Skip to main content

Full text of "Collections"

See other formats


)m 


iXC'^ 


mmi 


1 

1 

1 

1 

«»ljj(? 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2007  with  funding  from 

IVIicrosoft  Corporation 


http://www.archive.org/details/collectionsspring02illiuoft 


COLLECTIONS 

OF  THE 

ILLINOIS  STATE  HISTORICAL 
LIBRARY 

VOLUME  II 


VIRGINIA  SERIES,  VOL.  I. 

CAHOKIA  RECORDS 
1778-1790 


EDITED   WITH   INTRODUCTION  AND  NOTES 
BY 

CLARENCE  WALWORTH  ALVORD 

UNIVERSITY  OF  ILLINOIS 


Published  by  the  Trustees  of  the 
ILLINOIS   STATE  HISTORICAL  LIBRARY 

SPRINGFIELD,  ILLINOIS 


a 


/ 


Copyright  1907 

BY 

The  Illinois  State  Historical  Library 


R.  R.  DONNELLEY  &  SONS  COMPANY 
CHICAGO 


ILLINOIS 
STATE  HISTORICAL  LIBRARY 


BOARD  OF  TRUSTEES 

Edmund  Janes  James,  President 

McKendree  Hypes  Chamberlain,  Vice-President 

George  Nelson  Black,  Secretary 


Mrs.  Jessie  Palmer  Weber,  Librarian 


ADVISORY  COMMISSION 

Evarts  Boutell  Greene,  Chairman 
James  Alton  James 
Henry  Johnson  * 
Edward  Carleton  Page 
Charles  Henry  Rammelkamp 
Edwin  Erle  Sparks 

*  RESIGNED  SEPTEMBER,   1906 


CONTENTS 


PAGE 

I.     Introduction xiii 

II.     Petition  to  Clark     .....  i 

III.  Stray    Leaves   from    the   Court    of   the 

Committee  of  Cahokia  ....  2 

IV.  Record  of  Court  Established  by  George 

Rogers  Clark          4 

V.     Act     of     Virginia     Assembly     Creating 

County  of  Illinois          ....  9 

VI.     Transcripts  from  the  Cahokia  Record   .  12 
VII.     Record  of  the  Court  of  the  District  of 

Cahokia  .......  22 

VIII      Extract    from    the    Registers    of    the 

Magistracy  of  Cahokia          .         .         .  448 

IX.     Cahokia  Documents,  French     .         .         .  526 

X.     Cahokia  Documents,  English    .         .         .  610 

XI.     Bibliography       ......  6^^ 

Index            . 639 


ILLUSTRATIONS 


PAGE 


Old  Documents  ......  Frontispiece 

Philippe  Francois  de  Rastel,  Chevalier  de  Roche- 

BLAVE .         .    xxvi 

Charles  Gratiot 4 

Facsimile  of  Record  by  Saucier,  Clerk   ...       26 

House  of  Francois  Saucier 284 

Facsimile  of  Record  by  Labuxiere,  Clerk       .         .     398 
Map  of  the  Country  of  the  Illinois   .       Inside  back  cover 


PREFACE. 

In  the  fall  of  1905,  the  trustees  of  the  Illinois  State  Historical 
Library  appointed  an  advisory  commission  to  formulate  a  plan  for 
the  future  publications  of  the  Library.  On  the  recommendation 
of  this  commission  it  was  determined  that  the  Illinois  Historical 
Collections  should  be  continued  and  the  volumes  numbered 
consecutively,  but  also  that  series  should  be  formed  of  the 
volumes  of  the  Collections  devoted  to  the  same  historical  period, 
such  as  the  French,  the  British,  the  Virginia,  etc.  The  present 
volume  is  the  first  which  has  been  published  under  this  new  plan 
and,  as  its  title  shows,  it  is  the  first  volume  of  the  Virginia  series. 
For  this  reason  an  introduction  has  been  prepared  containing 
the  history  of  those  years,  when  Illinois  formed  a  part  of  the 
commonweath  of  Virginia  and  the  government  established  by 
that  state  continued  to  exercise  authority  over  the  French  villages. 

Had  not  a  prior  discovery  of  the  manuscripts  imposed  this 
selection  upon  me,  I  should  not  have  chosen  to  edit  the  records  of 
Cahokia  first;  for,  interesting  as  is  the  picture  of  this  frontier 
community  which  they  present,  the  central  movement  withm  the 
county  of  Illinois  is  best  traced  at  Kaskaskia,  and  as  a  collection, 
the  records  of  that  village  would  offer  greater  variety  and  interest. 
How  rich  is  the  material,  which  still  remains  to  be  published,  may 
be  readily  seen  from  the  Introduction. 

There  will  be  found  in  this  volume  many  new  interpretations  of 
past  events  as  well  as  descriptions  of  those  which  have  been 
hitherto  unknown,  the  result  of  a  careful  comparison  of  sources, 
frequently  used  by  previous  writers,  and  a  study  of  much  new 
material  recently  discovered.  In  writing  the  history  of  these 
years  I  have  felt  very  like  a  pioneer  and  later  researches  may 
not  uphold  all  my  conclusions.  The  work  has  been  done  with  the 
sources  before  me,  however,  and  no  important  statement  has  been 
made  without  a  careful  sifting  of  the  evidence  as  offered  by  the  pri- 


X  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

mary  witnesses.  It  has  been  my  endeavor  to  tell  the  story  as  it 
is  narrated  by  those  who  took  part  in  these  events  and  to  remain 
uninfluenced  by  prejudice  for  or  against  either  parties  or  men. 
If,  on  the  whole,  the  picture  of  the  misery  of  the  French  people 
under  the  tyranny  of  the  Virginians  appears  to  occupy  too  promi- 
nent a  place,  it  is  because  the  testimony  of  both  themselves  and 
the  Americans  warrants  it.  Another  reason  may  be  found  in  the 
fact  that  the  Americans  were  the  aggressors,  and,  as  the  critic  of  a 
musical  performance  describes  the  action  of  the  performers  rather 
than  the  instruments,  so  the  deeds  of  the  frontiersmen  rather  than 
the  merely  passive  experience  of  the  French  people  must  form 
the  theme  of  this  narrative. 

In  the  preparation  of  this  volume  I  have  become  indebted  to 
many  persons,  who  have  given  freely  both  of  time  and  information. 
To  them  I  wish  to  make  my  acknowledgments  and  to  express 
my  thanks.  Several  have,  however,  given  me  such  assistance 
that  a  more  personal  expression  is  called  for.  My  colleague, 
Professor  Thomas  E.  Oliver  of  the  department  of  modem  lan- 
guages, has  devoted  time  and  thought  to  the  reading  of  the  text  and 
the  elucidaton  of  its  meaning.  It  has  been  of  the  greatest  value  to 
me  that  I  have  been  permitted  to  use  his  careful  scholarship  in 
all  difficult  cases.  Mr.  Benjamin  Suite  of  Ottawa,  Canada,  has 
read  all  the  proof  of  the  French  and  the  translation  and  his  many 
valuable  suggestions  have  been  incorporated  into  the  text  and  foot- 
notes. Hon.  Walter  B.  Douglas  of  St.  Louis  spent  several  days 
with  me  over  the  translation  of  the  legal  phrases  and  besides  has 
added  much  to  the  completeness  of  the  book  from  his  notes. 
For  their  unfailing  kindness  and  courtesy  in  superintending  the 
search  for  material  and  the  copying  of  manuscripts,  my  thanks 
are  due  to  Dr.  Reuben  G.  Thwaites  of  the  Wisconsin  Historical 
Society,  Dr.  Arthur  G.  Doughty  of  the  Canadian  Archives,  Dr. 
J.  Franklin  Jameson  of  the  Carnegie  Institution,  and  Dr.  H.  J. 
Eckenrode  of  the  Virginia  State  Library.  Institutions  such  as 
the  Missouri  Historical  Society  of  St.  Louis  and  the  Chicago 
Historical  Society  have  offered  the  freest  use  of  their  collections 
and  to  their  officers  I  desire  to  express  my  gratitude.     I  would 


PREFACE  xi 

also  acknowledge  my  indebtedness  for  the  help  they  have  given 
me  in  reading  parts  of  the  manuscript  or  proof  to  Dr.  Louise 
Phelps  Kellogg  of  Madison  and  my  colleagues,  Professor  Evarts 
B.  Greene,  Professor  Stephen  A.  Forbes  and  Mr.  Frank  W. 
Scott.  In  makmg  the  transcription,  in  preparing  the  manuscript, 
and  in  reading  the  proof  my  wife  has  been  my  constant  assistant 
and  to  her  sympathetic  judgments  and  criticisms  the  volume 
owes  many  improvements  in  arrangement,  interpretations,  and 
diction.  While  rendering  thanks  for  the  assistance  given  me  by 
these  many  friends,  it  must  be  understood  that  they  are  in  no  way , 
responsible  for  any  errors  which  may  be  found  in  the  volume ; 
for  these  I  hold  myself  alone  accountable. 

Urbana,  Illinois,  May,  1907.  CLARENCE  W.  Alvord. 


INTRODUCTION. 

On  the  banks  of  the  Mississippi  in  southwestern  Illinois,  lies 
the  American  Bottom,  the  land  most  hallowed  by  romance  and 
history  of  all  the  lands  of  the  old  Northwest.  Taking  no  account 
of  the  prehistoric  epoch  whose  monuments  survive  in  the  numerous 
Indian  mounds  of  the  region,  we  find  its  history  rilnning  back  over 
two  centuries  to  the  time  when  the  first  white  settlers  placed 
their  villages  by  the  side  of  the  great  river  of  the  West  in  an 
attempt  to  realize  the  idea  of  a  colonial  empire  as  conceived  by 
the  Grand  Monarch  in  his  palace  at  Versailles.  Here  for  almost 
a  hundred  years,  while  the  dominion  over  the  Northwest  was 
passing  from  France  to  England  and  from  England  to  the 
United  States,  these  villages  endured  unchanged  amidst  the  creeks 
and  ponds  of  the  bottom,  which  mirrored  in  their  quiet  waters  the 
old  world  civilization  transported  into  the  heart  of  the  wilderness 
from  feudalized  France. 

The  American  Bottom^  extended  southward  from  opposite  the 
mouth  of  the  Missouri  for  about  a  hundred  miles  to  the  point 
where  the  Kaskaskia  formerly  emptied  her  waters  into  the 
Mississippi;  but  within  recent  times  the  lower*  part  of  this 
tract  has  been  cut  away  by  the  greater  river's  breaking  through 
to  the  bed  of  the  smaller,  thus  conveying  to  the  Missouri  side  a 
piece  of  this  historic  ground.  Here  is  found  some  of  the  most 
fertile  land  in  the  United  States.  Like  historic  Egypt,  it  is  the 
gift  of  a  river  and,  like  it,  is  submerged  at  intervals,  although  not 
periodically,  by  the  fertilizing  waters  that  gave  it  birth.  In 
breadth  the  bottom  land  varies  from  three  to  seven  miles,  the 
average  being  about  five.    When  the  first  settlers  came,  it  pre- 

^  The  name  was  given  it  when  the  Mississippi  formed  the  western  boundary  of  the  United 
States.  It  was  probably  thus  named  by  the  Spaniards  across  the  river.  (Peck,  A  Gazetteer 
of  Illinois,  ad  ed.,  5.)  Another  explanation  of  the  name  has  been  derived  from  the  fact  that 
the  Americans  spread  their  settlements  over  the  bottom  land  more  than  the  French.  This 
latter  explanation  must  have  arisen  after  the  United  States  acquired  Louisiana  and  the  name 
had  lost  its  earlier  significance. 

xiii 


xiv  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

sen  ted  to  the  eye  a  yiew  of  almost  tropical  luxuriance,  inviting  the 
beholders  to  make  their  homes  in  a  spot  that  offered  more  than 
the  land  of  promise  flowing  with  milk  and  honey.  Along  the  bank 
of  the  Mississippi  was  a  forest  of  about  a  mile  in  width,  wherein 
grew  various  kinds  of  nut  trees,  hickory,  pecan,  black  walnut, 
and  here  and  there  were  scattered  groves  of  crabapple  and  single 
trees  of  the  persimmon  and  mulberry.  The  underbrush  was 
composed  of  numberless  thickets  of  wild  plums,  blackberry  and 
other  bushes;  and  all  were  matted  together  by  the  grapevines, 
which,  in  their  efforts  to  gain  the  sunlight,  twined  serpent-like 
about  the  tree  trunks,  encircled  the  branches,  and  almost  covered 
the  tops  with  their  broad  leaves.  On  the  east  side  of  the  bottom 
was  a  long  stretch  of  limestone  bluffs,  rising  perpendicularly  from 
the  plain  to  the  height  of  about  a  hundred  feet,  effectually  cutting 
off  the  low  land  from  the  prairies  beyond.  The  bluffs  presented 
their  rough-hewn  faces  to  the  view  like  the  bastions  of  some 
cyclopian  fortress,  but  in  places  they  were  screened  by  the  trees 
which  clung  to  their  sides  and  hung  from  their  crests.  Between 
the  forest  and  the  cliffs  lay  an  undulating  meadow,  the  surface 
of  which  was  varied  by  belts  of  trees  bordering  the  lakes  and 
ponds  or  fringing  the  streams  which  had  found  their  way 
through  the  bluffs  and  followed  their  quiet  courses  to  the 
great  river  beyond.  On  both  meadow  and  bluff  the  growth  of 
the  flora  was  luxuriant.  In  the  marshy  places  the  reeds  raised 
their  slender  tops  far  above  the  head  of  the  passer-by,  hiding 
from  view  the  snowy  lilies  serenely  floating  on  the  surface  of  the 
ponds;  while  in  forest,  field,  and  swamp  the  bluebells,  goldenrod, 
mallows,  and  cardinal  flowers  made  the  scene  on  every  side  gay 
with  their  brilliant  hues. 

Here  nature  offered  her  gifts  with  bounteous  hand ;  but  as  in 
all  such  lands  of  tropical  prodigality  the  climate  was  warm  and 
enervating,  inducing  in  man  a  love  of  indolence  and  repose  rather 
than  the  more  virile  emotions.  The  ponds  and  streams,  so  beauti- 
ful with  their  fringe  of  foliage  in  spring,  became  in  summer  stag- 
nant and  were  the  breeding  places  of  myriads  of  mosquitoes, 
which  scattered  the  germs  of  disease  among  the  hardy  invaders 


INTRODUCTION  xv 

of  the  wilderness.  In  the  springtime  the  waters  of  the  Missis- 
sippi submerged  the  land  and  occasionally  stretched  in  an 
unbroken  expanse  from  the  bluffs  of  Illinois  to  those  of  the 
opposite  shore.^ 

This  is  not  the  place  to  tell  the  earliest  history  of  this  region, 
of  the  exertions  of  the  French  to  settle  and  hold  the  Mississippi 
valley,  or  of  that  inevitable  struggle  with  England  which  ensued ; 
for  the  narrative  of  the  documents  printed  in  these  pages  be- 
longs to  a  later  period.  When  their  story  begins  the  American 
Revolution  was  at  its  height,  and  the  echoes  of  that  struggle,  heard 
on  the  banks  of  the  Mississippi,  had  awakened  in  the  hearts  of 
the  French  habitants  a  fond  hope  of  freedom;  when  their  story 
ends,  the  constitution  of  the  United  States  had  been  adopted  and 
the  new-bom  nation  was  prepared  to  attempt  the  solution  of  the 
difficult  problems  incident  to  her  heritage  in  the  West.  Between 
these  dates  the  American  frontiersmen  had  found  their  way  to 
the  Illinois  and  the  dramatic  struggle  of  Anglo-Saxon  energy 
with  Gallic  quietism  had  begun. 

In  the  year  1778  there  was  a  population  of  less  than  a  thou- 
sand white  settlers  and  of  about  the  same  number  of  negroes  and 
Indians  in  the  villages  of  the  bottom.  At  the  north  was  Cahokia 
with  its  three  hundred  whites  and  eighty  negroes;  forty-five 
miles  south  was  St.  Philippe,  formerly  inhabited  by  a  dozen  fami- 
lies, but  now,  because  of  the  exodus  of  the  French  at  the  time  of 
the  transference  of  the  territory  to  the  British,  with  only  two  or 
three  remaining ;  at  Fort  de  Chartres  village,  called  Nouvelle  Char- 
tres,  there  still  lingered  a  few  French  settlers;  three  miles  farther 
south  Prairie  du  Rocher  nestled  under  the  bluffs,  from  which 
it  took  its  name,  with  a  population  of  a  himdred  whites  and 
almost  as  many  slaves;    and   at   the   extreme  south  was  the 

1  Hutchins,  Topographical  Description,  ed.  Hicks,  io6  et  seq.',  for  a  good  description  of 
the  American  Bottom,  see  Flagg,  The  Far  West,  in  Thwaites,  Early  Western  Travels,  xxvii., 
io6  et  seq.  At  the  end  of  this  volume  will  be  found  a  map  of  the  American  Bottom  taken 
from  Collot,  Voyage  dans  L'Ameriqtie  Septentrionale.  This  map  was  originally  printed  wrong 
way  around,  for  the  river  flows  north  and  south  instead  of  east  and  west  as  indicated  by  the 
caption .  I  have  removed  the  compass  of  the  original  map,  but  ha  ve  not  made  the  other  necessary 
alterations,  preferring  to  print  it  as  in  the  original.  The  basis  of  this  map  was  undoubtedly 
Hutchins'  well-known  map  of  the  same  region.  My  additions  are  the  names  of  Prairie  du 
Pont,  Grand  Ruisseau  and  Prairie  du  Rocher.  I  have  also  changed  the  name  Fountain  to 
Belle  Fontaine. 


xvi  ILLINOIS  fflSTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

metropolis  of  the  bottom,  Kaskaskia,  which  boasted  eighty  houses, 
five  hundred  white  inhabitants,  and  almost  as  many  black. 

The  settlement  of  the  white  men  in  the  bottom  had  not  driven 
out  the  aborigines,  for  the  French  have  always  dwelt  in  peace 
with  the  American  Indians,  the  management  of  whom  they  imder- 
stood  far  better  than  did  the  Anglo-Saxons.  Near  the  French 
villages  were  the  homes  of  these  children  of  the  prairies,  who 
numbered  at  the  time  less  than  five  hundred  members  of  the 
four  remaining  tribes  of  the  Kaskaskias,  Peorias,  Mitchigamies, 
and  Cahokias.  The  French  and  British  travelers  are  unanimous 
in  describing  these  Illinois  Indians  as  degenerate  descendants 
of  a  once  warlike  people.  Their  association  with  the  French, 
instead  of  fitting  them  better  to  meet  the  trials  of  life  in  the  wilder- 
ness, had  corrupted  the  qualities  of  bravery  and  physical  courage 
and  made  them  the  debauched  parasites  of  their  white  neigh- 
bors.^ 

Besides  these  settlements  of  the  American  Bottom  on  the 
Mississippi  River,  there  were  in  the  valley  of  the  Wabash  the  two 
important  posts  of  Ouiatanon  and  Vincennes,  the  latter  of  which 
rivaled  the  Illinois  villages  in  population  and  importance ;  for  it 
was  by  the  Wabash  that  the  principal  trade  route  between  the 
more  western  posts  and  Canada  ran.^  Many  smaller  settlements 
were  scattered  throughout  the  region ;  at  Peoria  on  the  Illinois 
river,  where  lately  Jean  Bte.  Mailhet  had  revived  an  older  trad- 
ing post;  at  St.  Joseph  on  the  river  of  the  same  name,  and  at 
Miami;  and  here  and  there  smaller  groups  of  French  traders 
might  be  found  in  the  Indian  villages  and  elsewhere.  These 
smaller  posts  served  only  the  purposes  of  trade.  Their  white 
inhabitants,  being  migratory  in  their  habits,  either  followed  the 
Indians  on  their  periodic  hunts  or  went  from  one  post  to  another 
merely  to  buy  the  furs  when  the  Indians  returned. 

The  British  dominion  ended  with  the  Mississippi  River.  On 
the  western  bank  were  other  French  villages  such  as  St.  Louis  and 

1  Pittman,  European  Settlements  on  the  Mississippi,  ed.  Hodder,  84  et  seq.;  Hutchins, 
Topographical  Description,  ed.  Hicks,  107  et  seq. 

2  Benton,  The  Wabash  Trade  Route,  J.  H.  U.  Studies,  xxi.;  Dunn,  Indiana,  passim/ 
Craig,  Ouiatanon,  in  Ind.  Hist.  Soc.  Publications,  ii.;  Fraxiz,  Die  Kolonisation  des  Mississippi- 
tales,  199. 


INTRODUCTION  ivii 

Ste.  Genevieve,  belonging  to  the  government  of  Spain.  They 
did  not  differ  greatly  in  character  or  population  from  these  of 
the  British  shore ;  but  since  the  rule  of  the  Spaniard  was  on  the 
whole  more  congenial  to  the  Gallic  temperament,  many  of  the 
more  progressive  settlers  from  the  eastern  bank  had  made  their 
homes  there  during  the  last  decade,  and  the  Spanish  bank  enjoyed 
greater  prosperity  and  a  more  rapid  increase  of  population  than 
did  the  British,  advantages  which  the  events  of  the  succeeding 
years  tended  to  augment,  so  that  at  the  end  of  the  period  under 
review  the  Spanish  shore  had  profited  by  the  misfortunes  of  the 
neighboring  villages.^ 

Most  of  the  French  of  the  western  posts  came  from  Canada, 
with  which  country  they  retained  constant  communication  through 
trade  and  exchange  of  messages  on  family  affairs.  Very  few  had 
come  directly  from  France  and  the  number  from  southern  Loui- 
siana was  relatively  small.^  Here  in  Illinois  and  on  the  Wabash 
which  under  both  the  French  and  British  regime  were  subject  to 
the  same  jurisdiction,^  they  had  lived  for  one  or  two  generations, 
engaged  in  the  pursuits  of  trade  and  the  cultivation  of  their 
small  farms.  The  majority,  known  as  the  habitants,  coming 
as  they  did  from  the  lower  classes  of  France,  were  illiterate  and 
ignorant;  and  their  life  in  the  wilderness,  far  removed  from  the 
restraints  of  civilized  society,  had  not  improved  their  mental 
or  moral  qualities,  but  had  developed  those  best  fitted  to  their 
mode  of  living.  Like  the  Indians  with  whom  they  associated 
and  even  intermarried,'*  they  were  active,  adroit  and  hardy,  but 

^  See  post,  pp.  cxlii  et  seq. 

3  See  notes  to  census  on  pp.  624  et  seq.  Reynolds  (Afy  Own  Times,  ch.  xii.)  says  that  the 
population  of  Kaskaskia  and  Cahokia  showed  differences  due  to  their  origins,  the  former  being 
settled  from  Mobile  and  New  Orleans  and  the  latter  from  Canada.  Although  I  have  not 
traced  out  the  origin  of  all  the  families  of  Kaskaskia  as  I  have  of  those  of  Cahokia,  I  have 
noticed  no  indications  of  such  a  difference.  Certainly  all  the  prominent  families  of  Kaskaskia 
were  Canadian  and  the  names  of  the  other  families  are  easily  recognized  as  coming  from 
the  same  place.  Although  it  is  necessary  to  make  some  use  of  Reynolds'  books,  they  must 
be  recognized  as  the  most  unreliable  sources  for  the  early  period  that  we  have.  More  errors 
in  the  histories  of  the  state  may  be  traced  back  to  his  statements  than  to  any  other  one  source. 

3  This  is  true  only  of  the  more  important  village,  Vincennes;  for  Ouiatanon  was  under 
the  government  of  Canada,  and  Vincennes  with  the  Illinois  villages  in  the  province  of  Loui- 
siana during  the  French  period.     Dunn,  Indiana,  58. 

*  All  writers  testify  to  the  intermarrying  between  the  French  and  Indians,  but  I  have 
been  surprised  at  the  infrequency  of  the  occurrence  of  marriage  contracts  between  repre- 
sentatives of  the  two  races  among  their  records.  This  may  be  due  to  the  fact  that  contracts 
on  such  occasions  were  not  used.  I  am  inclined  to  believe,  however,  that  the  frequency 
of  such  marriages  has  been  somewhat  exaggerated  by  the  travelers. 


xviii  IIJJNOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

also  cunning  and  treacherous.  At  their  best  the  voyageurs  and 
coureurs  de  bois  could  be  seen  laboriously  pulling  their  flat  boats 
laden  with  produce  up  the  rivers  or  gliding  in  their  canoes  on  the 
wood-girt  streams  and  ponds  in  pursuit  of  game.  In  such  labors 
they  were  merry,  patient,  and  industrious;  as  a  rule  they  were 
faithful  in  the  performance  of  their  engagements  and  were  warm 
in  their  friendships,  but  to  their  enemies  revengeful  and  ready 
to  take  the  meanest  advantage.  Yet  their  life  amidst  the  dangers 
of  the  forest  did  not  develop  in  them  physical  courage,  for  in  the 
presence  of  an  unexpected  attack  from  Indians  or  others  they 
were  generally  timid  and  resourceless.^  Without  doubt  many 
individual  examples  of  pluck  and  bravery  might  be  enumerated ; 
but  in  comparison  with  the  American  frontiersmen  the  French 
voyageurs  and  coureurs  de  bois  exhibited  little  boldness  and  initia- 
tive in  action.  Returned  to  the  settlement  they  were  careless 
and  pleasure  loving,  dissipating  their  energies  in  drinking,  gam- 
bling, and  gossiping;  and,  as  irresponsible  as  children,  they 
were  easily  turned  aside  from  the  pursuit  of  their  real  interests. 
It  can  be  readily  understood  that  to  the  men  who  followed  the 
wilderness  trace  or  tracked  the  wild  beasts  in  the  dark  forest, 
agriculture  and  the  mechanic  arts  would  offer  little  or  no  attrac- 
tion ;  but  even  in  the  pursuit  of  their  calling  one  looks  in  vain  for 
a  sign  of  the  enterprising  spirit  of  the  Anglo-Saxon. 

Although  priests  and  governors  made  loud  complaint  of  the  dis- 
orderliness  of  these  habitants,  yet  their  pleasures  and  vices  were 
of  a  far  milder  type  than  those  of  their  counterparts,  the  Ameri- 
can backwoodsmen.  The  French  always  retained  a  respect 
for  law  and  constituted  authority  and  preferred  to  be  guided 
rather  than  to  lead.  The  expression  of  their  individualism  was 
checked  in  the  presence  of  officials,  for  government  meant  to  them 
authority  with  a  divine  right  to  rule.  In  all  their  dealings,  busi- 
ness and  social,  they  never  neglected  to  call  in  the  assistance  of 
notary  or  judge,  whose  legal  papers  they  preserved,  as  their 
records  show,  with  the  greatest  care  and  reverence.     In  their 

1  This  is  abundantly  proved  by  the  following  pages.  Such  is  also  the  testimony  of  the 
fur  traders  of  the  far  West,  who  employed  the  descendants  of  these  French  as  voyageurs  and 
hunters.     Chittenden,  American  Fur  Trade,  i.  57. 


INTRODUCTION  xix 

petty  quarrels  with  each  other  the  Frenchmen  saw  no  disgrace  in 
seeking  from  the  court  a  "reparation  of  honor"  instead  of  ending 
them  with  the  brutal  fights  common  among  the  Americans. 
Though  given  to  drinking  and  gambling,  the  dance  was  their 
favorite  amusement,  and  to  the  weekly  frolic  came  the  men  and 
matrons,  the  young  men  and  maidens ;  and  even  the  priest  graced 
these  festive  gatherings.  Here  all  danced  until  the  small  hours 
of  the  night  or  even  to  daybreak  with  no  appearance  of  rowdy- 
ism or  vulgarity  to  mar  their  simple  festivities.* 

It  is  due  to  the  remembrance  of  this  lower  class,  the  habitants, 
that  travelers,  both  French  and  English,  have  condemned  in 
such  unmeasured  terms  the  Illinois  French  settlers ;  but  the  pic- 
ture of  the  village  society  would  be  incomplete  if  limited  to  a 
description  of  the  coureurs  de  hois  and  voyageurs;  for  it  was 
never  wholly  vulgarized  and  depraved,  owing  to  the  presence 
here  of  many  persons  from  the  better  classes  of  France  and 
Canada  —  the  gentry,  Clark  called  them  —  who,  accustomed 
to  greater  refinements  of  life  than  those  of  the  log  cabin, 
endeavored  to  surround  themselves  with  such  little  elegancies 
as  might  be  brought  from  Canada  or  elsewhere.  Some  of  the 
residents  could  claim  nobility  of  birth.  The  acting  commandant 
in  1778  was  son  of  the  seigniorial  lord  of  Savoumon,  the  sieur  de 
Rocheblave.  Timothe  Boucher,  who  a  few  years  later  held  a 
similar  position,  was  the  sieur  de  Monbreun,^  a  grandson  of 
Pierre  Boucher  several  times  governor  of  Three  Rivers,  who  was 
ennobled  for  his  services  in  1660.  Among  the  gentry,  which  was 
a  rather  elastic  term,  were  also  many  well-to-do  men,  who  had 
risen  to  prominence  in  the  Illinois  or  else  possessed  some  patri- 
mony, before  migrating  to  the  West,  which  they  had  increased  by 
trade.  Such  was  Jean  Bte.  Barbau  of  Prairie  du  Rocher,  the 
members  of  the  Bauvais '  and  Charleville  families  of  Kaskaskia 

1  Reynolds,  My  Own  Times,  ch.  xii. 

2  For  an  account  of  his  place  in  Illinois  history,  see  post,  p.  cxxiv.  The  name  is  spelled  in 
Canada  Montbrun,  but  this  member  always  wrote  it  as  given  above,  except  in  one  place, 
which  I  have  noticed,  when  he  placed  after  it  a  superior  t. 

3  Reference  to  the  family  will  be  found  at  various  places  in  the  Introduction  see  pp.xx.. 
n.  5,  li.,  n.  3,  cvii.,  cxvi.,  cxxxv.  The  members  of  the  family  alwaj^  wrote  the  name  as  spelled 
above.    They  commonly  used  their  second  name  in  preference  to  their  surname  St.  Gemme. 


XX  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

and  their  neighbors  and  friends,  the  Viviats,  the  Lachances,  and 
the  Janis ;  and  at  Cahokia,  the  Sauciers,  Francois  Trottier,  Antoine 
Girardin,  and  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix.^  Next  to  the  acting  commandant 
the  most  important  individual  of  the  American  Bottom  was 
Gabriel  Cerre,  who  had  acquired  his  wealth  in  the  fur  trade. 
He  was  well  educated  and  had  correspondents  in  Canada  and 
elsewhere.^  Among  the  rising  young  men  must  be  reckoned 
Charles  Gratiot,  who  had  established  himself  at  Cahokia  in  1777 
and  was  associated  in  business  with  three  Canadian  merchants. 
He  had  had  an  excellent  education,  spoke  several  languages,  was 
something  of  a  dandy  in  dress,  and  had  by  his  address  won  for 
himself  a  place  of  influence  in  the  community.^  These  were  the 
men  and  others  like  them  to  whom  Sir  William  Johnson,  the 
British  Indian  commissioner  referred,  when  he  wrote  that  the 
French  traders  were  gentlemen  in  character,  manners,  and  dress, 
and  "men  of  abilities,  influence,  and  address."* 

These  members  of  the  gentry  lived  far  more  elegantly  than 
the  American  backwoodsmen  and  were  their  superiors  in  culture. 
Their  houses  were  commodious  and  their  life  was  made  easy  for 
themselves  and  families  by  a  large  retinue  of  slaves.  ^  They  were 
in  social  life  pleasant,  their  hospitality  was  proverbial,  and  their 
courtesy  to  strangers  constant.  They  evidently  maintained  the 
distinction  between  themselves  and  the  poorer  and  more  ignorant 
classes,  so  that  the  democracy  of  the  American  frontier  was  not 
established  among  them.  Thus  was  added  to  the  French  settle- 
ments an  element  of  refinement  and  elegance,  however  simple, 

1  For  these  Cahokians  see  the  foot-notes  on  pp.  624  et  seq. 

2  Gabriel  Cerre  was  born  at  Montreal,  August  12,  1734-  As  early  as  1755  he  was  estab- 
lished at  Kaskaskia,  where  he  married  in  1764  Catherine  Giard.  His  activities  at  the  time 
of  the  coming  of  Clark  are  told  in  the  succeeding  pages.  He  did  not  find  it  best  for  his  busi- 
ness interests  to  remain  among  the  Virginians  and  by  June  17,  1779,  had  made  his  preparations 
for  his  removal  to  St.  Louis  by  purchasing  a  lot  in  that  village.  The  date  he  left  Kaskaskia 
is  not  known,  but  was  probably  before  the  end  of  1779.  He  became  one  of  the  most  influen- 
tial citizens  of  St.  Louis  and  died  April  4,  1805.  Douglas,  "Jean  Gabriel  Cerre,  A  Sketch," 
in  Transactions  of  III.  Hist.  Soc,  1903. 

3  See  note  on  p.  4,  n.  2.  1  have  to  thank  Mr.  Pierre  Chouteau  of  St.  Louis  for  the  loan  of 
Journal  A  of  the  trading  company  of  David  McCrae,  John  Kay,  Pierre  Barthe,  and  Charles 
Gratiot.  The  first  entry  is  dated  at  Cahokia,  August  6,  1778.  The  journal  was  written  by 
Gratiot. 

*N.  y.  Col.  Doc,  vii.,  965. 

5  A  member  of  the  Bauvais  family  owned  eighty  .slaves.  Pittman,  Miss.  Settlements,  ed. 
Hodder,  85. 


INTRODUCTION  xxi 

which  was  always  lacking  in  the  more  virile,  if  less  romantic, 
commimities  of  the  American  pioneers.^ 

Except  for  the  wildness  of  the  surrounding  uncleared  land 
and  the  luxuriance  of  the  growth  of  vegetation,  these  villages  copied 
in  their  external  appearance  and  internal  life  the  similar  com- 
munities of  France  in  the  eighteenth  century.  Just  as  the  English 
settlers  on  the  seaboard  brought  with  them  their  English  house- 
hold goods  and  their  English  institutions,  and  planted  them  by 
the  streams  and  hills  of  New  England,  so  these  French  of  the 
Mississippi  valley  transplanted  from  the  heart  of  France  their 
homes  with  their  utensils  and  ornaments  and  the  village  com- 
munity in  which  they  and  their  ancestors  had  lived. 

All  the  houses  were  of  one  story  with  a  broad  veranda  on  one 
or  more  sides.  The  less  pretentious  ones  were  built  of  upright 
beams  set  in  horizontals  at  top  and  bottom  with  the  interstices 
between  the  beams  filled  with  what  was  called  "cat  and  clay", 
a  composition  of  clay  and  finely  cut  straw  or  moss.  At  one 
side,  and  sometimes  two,  there  was  a  large  chimney  for  the 
spacious  fireplace  of  the  living  room  and  kitchen.^  The  better 
houses  were  of  stone  and  with  their  sheds,  bams,  and  slave  quar- 
ters  gave   evidence   of   prosperity   and    wealth.     Around    each 

1  Very  severe  judgments  have  been  passed  upon  the  French  on  the  Mississippi  and  Wa- 
bash rivers  by  many  writers.  Among  these  the  most  important  have  been  the  British  officers 
and  the  later  French  travelers.  The  first  class  has  always  been  noted  for  its  incapacity  to 
appreciate  the  good  characteristics  of  a  civiUzation  different  from  its  own,  and  the  French 
travelers,  such  as  Michaud  and  CoUot,  visited  the  region  after  the  events  narrated  in  this 
Introduction  had  driven  the  more  progressive  men  from  the  eastern  bank  to  swell  the  Spanish 
villages.  Therefore  it  has  seemed  necessary  to  supplement  their  accounts  from  other  sources. 
In  writing  the  description  of  these  people  I  have  first  of  all  had  in  mind  the  record  of  their 
acts  contained  in  this  volume.  The  picture  formed  in  the  mind  after  reading  these  records 
is  not  that  of  the  most  "debased,  ignorant,  and  superstitious  of  humanity",  but  rather  the 
reverse.  These  facts  should  in  part  offset  the  strictures  of  Fraser  and  Croghan,  as  should 
also  the  letter  of  Sir  William  Johnson  quoted  above.  At  their  best  the  French  of  Illinois 
were  not  dissimilar  from  those  on  the  Spanish  bank,  so  that  the  description  of  Ste.  Gene- 
vieve by  Brackenridge  is  correct  enough  for  Illinois.  Any  knowledge  of  the  conditions  in 
Canada  may  be  used  cautiously  also.  We  have  two  attempts  to  form  judgments  of  these 
French,  coming  from  men  of  different  character.  The  first  is  by  C.  F.  Volney,  who  visited 
the  region  in  1796  and  the  other  by  Edmund  Flagg  whose  visit  was  made  in  1836.  The 
testimony  of  Governor  Reynolds  may  also  be  admitted,  since  he  lived  among  them  and  knew 
them  well.  Fraser,  Report,  from  a  copy  in  the  pubhc  library  of  Champaign,  111.;  Croghan, 
Journals,  in  Thwaites,  Early  Western  Travels,  i.,  152;  Letter  of  Sir  WiUiam  Johnson  inN .  Y . 
Col.  Doc,  vii.,  965;  Volney,  View  of  the  U.  S.,  370  et  seq.;  Michaud  Travels,  in  Early  West- 
ern Travels,  iii.,  70;  Brackenridge,  Recollections,  19  et  seq.;  Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii., 
137.  CoUot,  Voyage  da:is  U Amerique,  i.,  318;  Flagg,  Far  West,  in  Thwaites  Early  West- 
ern Travels,  xxvii.,  52  e<  seq.  An  excellent  description  of  the  French-Canadians  of  the  period 
may  be  found  in  Coffin,  The  Province  0}  Quebec  and  the  Early  American  Revolution,  282  et 
seq.;   see  also  Franz,  Die  Kolonisation  des  Mississippitales,  382. 

2  See  illustration  of  a  typical  house  of  this  character,  p.  284.  Descriptions  of  such  houses 
may  be  found  in  Monette,  Hist,  of  the  Valley  of  the  Miss.,  i.,  183  and  Volney,  View  of  the 

U.  S.,  368. 


k 


xxii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

dwelling  was  a  small  yard  enclosed  by  a  picket  fence,  within 
which  enclosure  were  the  orchard  and  the  kitchen  and  flower 
gardens.  The  whole  presented  an  attractive  picture  of  quiet 
and  peaceful  home  life.  Within  the  house  everything  was  gener- 
ally home  made,  although  some  of  the  more  wealthy  brought 
their  furniture  from  Canada.  The  poorer  houses  appeared 
shabby  and  badly  kept,  for  the  French  women  were  careless 
housekeepers,  and  rather  extravagant  and  wasteful.  At  least  such 
was  the  opinion  of  the  American  settlers  who  lived  among 
them.^  « 

On  account  of  the  social  character  of  the  people,  the  isolated 
farm  house  was  uncommon  in  the  bottom  and  the  village  com- 
munity was  the  rule.  The  streets  were  narrow  and  the  houses  were 
placed  close  to  the  edge  of  the  lots,  almost  on  the  street-line.  The 
farm  land  lay  outside  the  village  in  two  large  fields,  one  the  com- 
mon field  and  the  other  the  commons.  The  common  field  was 
divided  into  long  narrow  strips,  ten  to  forty  perches  in  width  and 
extending  from  the  river  to  the  bluffs ;  these  the  inhabitants  culti- 
vated. The  commons  was  the  wood  and  pasture  land  belonging 
to  the  community,^  and  was  separated  from  the  cultivated  fields 
by  a  fence,  which  was  erected  by  the  proprietors,  each  being 
responsible  for  that  part  crossing  his  land.  The  community  had 
the  right  to  make  concessions  from  the  commons  and  add  them 
to  the  common  field  for  new  arrivals  and  for  newly  formed  fami- 

1  Volney,  A  Vieio  of  the  U.  S.,  373  et  seq. 

2  The  statement  is  true  enough  for  the  period  under  consideration.  This  is  not  the 
place  for  a  discussion  of  the  history  of  French  land  tenure  in  America,  for  the  origin  of  the 
system  must  be  sought  in  the  period  of  the  French  regime  and  the  final  settlement  of  the 
questions  arising  out  of  it  in  the  years  after  the  United  States  took  control,  so  that  the  dis- 
cussion of  the  land  tenure  will  naturally  come  within  the  scope  of  some  future  volume.  How- 
ever, a  few  words  on  the  subject  may  be  of  value  in  explaining  the  situation.  The  land 
acquired  from  the  Indians  for  the  purpose  of  colonization  was  regarded  as  belonging  to  the 
king's  dornain,  after  the  company  of  the  Indies  resigned  the  government  of  it.  This  domain 
land  was  disposed  of  in  two  ways.  ist.  Large  tracts  might  be  granted  to  individuals  as  seignio- 
ries. The  character  of  the  title  given  was  that  of  the  franc  alien,  which  in  the  eighteenth  cen- 
tury did  not  differ  essentially  from  the  benefice.  These  large  seigniories  were  divided  by  the 
proprietors  into  smaller  tracts  and  granted  to  the  habitants  as  censive  holdings,  which  paid 
the  grantor  a  perpetual  rent  of  a  sou  an  acre,  were  subject  tq  the  banalities,  and  escheated  to 
the  seignior  in  case  no  heirs  were  found.  2nd.  The  king  might  retain  the  control  of  the  land 
himself  and  grant  it  out  himself  in  censive  holdings,  as  he  did  at  Kaskaskia  and  Nouvelle 
Chartres.  The  land  cultivated  by  the  people  of  Cahokia  belonged  to  the  seigniory  of  the 
Seminary  of  Foreign  Missions;  St.  Philippe  was  a  seigniory  belonging  to  the  Regnaults  and 
Prairie  du  Rocher  had  been  originally  conceded  to  Boisbriant,  but  had  been  passed  on  by 
him  to  Langlois.  In  the  bottom  there  were  also  many  smaller  concessions  in  franc  alleu  and 
under  the  British  many  more  were  made  by  one  of  the  commandants.  VioUet,  Histoire 
du  droit  fran^ais,  746  et  seq.;  Archives  Colotiiales  a  Paris,  Set.  B.,  \o\.  43,  p.  789;  Breese, 
Early  Htst.  of  Illinois,  Appendix  E.;   Franz,  Die  Kolonisg^iow,  des  Mississippitales,  201. 


INTRODUCTION  xxiii 

lies.^  This  method  of  laying  out  the  fields  and  this  kind  of  land 
tenure  were  transplanted  from  France,  where  they  had  been 
developed  through  centuries;  for  when  the  French  people  found 
themselves  in  places  where  land  was  plentiful,  the  power  of  tradi- 
tion prevented  a  readjustment  of  their  ideas  in  regard  to  landhold- 
ings'  and  agriculture.  Hence  they  brought  with  them  the  mark 
system  and  tenure,  with  the  whole  machinery  for  the  adminis- 
tration of  the  village  land  as  they  knew  it  in  France.  The  time 
for  plowing,  sowing,  and  harvesting  was  regulated  by  the  assembly 
of  the  inhabitants,  as  well  as  all  other  questions  affecting  their 
common  property  and  common  interests.  The  officer  elected 
to  supervise  the  execution  of  the  laws  of  the  commons  and  the 
decisions  of  the  assembly  was  the  syndic,  of  whose  presence  in  the 
villages  on  the  Mississippi  during  the  eighteenth  century  there 
still  exists  proof.  The  assemblies  of  the  villagers,  which  copied 
the  French  custom  in  this  particular  as  in  all  others,  were  held 
before  the  church  door  after  mass  and  were  attended  by  all 
males  of  military  age.  ^ 

The  Illinois  French  were  not  an  agricultural  people,  although 
they  did  send  down  some  grain  and  cattle  to  New  Orleans.^ 
For  this  reason  they  made  no  progress  in  the  art  of  agriculture 
and  continued  to  till  their  fields  in  the  same  way  and  with  the 
same  kind  of  implements  as  had  their  fathers  for  generations 
before  them.  The  profits  and  the  adventurous  life  of  the  fur- 
trader  exercised  for  them  such  a  fascination  as  to  prevent  their 
pursuit  of  a  calling  which  would  have  given  them  a  firmer 
hold  upon  the  soil  and  might  have  preserved  them  from  many  of 
the  misfortunes  which  finally  overcame  them.  For  the  same  reason 
they  never  speculated  in  land  or  attempted  to  gain  possession  of 
large  holdings.  In  later  years,  when  they  in  a  way  controlled 
their  own  destiny,   they  tried  to  protect  themselves  from   the 

1  Babeau,  Le  villege  sous  Vancien  regime,  passim;  Flagg,  Far  West,  in  Thwaites,  Early 
Western  Travels,  xxvii.,  45  et  seq. 

2  Babeau,  Les  assemblies  generales  des  communautes  d' habitants;  Babeau,  Le  milage 
sous  Vancien  regime,  passim. 

3  When  compared  with  the  Americans,  this  is  true;  but  the  Illinois  French  raised  grain 
and  vegetables  to  a  greater  extent  than  has  generally  been  admitted,  and  their  exportation  of 
grain  to  New  Orleans  was  an  important  item  in  the  Mississippi  trade.  Franz,  Du  Kolonisa- 
tion  des  MississippUales,  251. 


xxiv  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

American  land-traders;  but  the  contest  was  too  unequal  and, 
since  their  own  hold  on  the  land  was  so  weak,  they  were  forced  to 
bow  to  fate  and  to  see  themselves  supplanted  by  the  Americans, 
who  were  builders  of  more  permanent  homes. 

The  most  conspicuous  buildings  in  the  villages  were  the 
churches.  The  Cahokia  church,  however,  was  in  ruins  in  1778  and 
was  rebuilt  in  the  next  few  years;  but  at  Kaskaskia  there  was 
"si  huge  old  pile,  extremely  awkward  and  ungainly,  with  its 
projecting  eaves,  its  walls  of  hewn  timber  perpendicularly  planted, 
and  the  interstices  stuffed  with  mortar,  with  its  quaint  old-fash- 
ioned spire,  and  its  dark,  storm-beaten  casements."  Here  the 
Kaskaskians  had  worshipped  for  two  generations.^  The  people 
were  for  the  most  part  very  devoted  to  their  religion,  and  the 
priests  exercised  great  influence  over  them.  Their  attachment 
was  due  more  to  traditional  allegiance,  however,  than  to  per- 
sonal conviction.  The  wild  life  of  the  wilderness  had  not  been 
without  its  effect,  and  the  lack  of  proper  supervision  had  resulted 
in  religious  recklessness;  yet  however  debauched  and  irreligious 
their  lives,  the  coureurs  de  hois  and  voyageurs  were  easily  brought 
by  a  vigorous  priest  to  acknowledge  their  dependence  on  the 
church.  At  the  moment  of  death  they  always  sought  the  consola- 
tions of  religion  and  left  by  will  money  for  the  saying  of  masses 
for  the  dead.  There  appears,  therefore,  to  have  been  no  rebel- 
lion against  the  church.  In  one  individual  case  only  is  there 
any  evidence  that  the  radical  thought  of  France  had  penetrated  to 
Illinois.^ 

In  the  management  of  the  church  property  the  villagers  were 
associated  with  the  priest  through  the  vestrymen,  whom  they 
elected  for  this  purpose  from  the  most  prominent  men  of  the 
communities.  Social  life  centered  in  the  church,  as  it  did  in  the 
Puritan  New  England  village,  and  the  people  looked  forward  to 
the  church  processions  and  festivals  as  important  events  in  their 

1  Shea,  Archbishop  Carroll,  passim;  Flagg,  7'he  Far  West,  in  Thwaites,  Western  Tra- 
vels, xxvii.,  62. 

2  Louis  Viviat  requests  in  his  will  that  no  pomp  and  ceremony  mark  his  buriai  and 
that  no  payment  be  made  for  masses  for  the  dead,  since  the  deity  is  not  mercenary  nor  is 
heaven  to  be  bought.     Kas.  Rec,  Court  Record. 


INTRODUCTION  xxv 

monotonous  village  life.  It  was  also  at  the  church  door  that  the 
assemblies  of  the  people  met,  that  the  auction  of  property  was 
held ;  and  it  was  after  the  church  service  that  the  Sunday  dance 
took  place.^ 

In  1778  the  priest  in  charge  of  the  Illinois  parishes  was  Father 
Pierre  Gibault,  who  with  some  interruptions  had  been  serving 
the  parishes  on  the  Mississippi  and  Wabash  since  1768.  He  was 
cur^  of  the  parish  of  the  Immaculate  Conception  of  Kaskaskia  and 
vicar  general  of  the  bishop  of  Quebec.  Father  Gibault  came 
from  a  good  Canadian  family.  He  was  enthusiastic  in  his 
work,  and  appears  to  have  maintained  order  in  the  parishes, 
which  had  been  long  neglected  or  served  only  by  Father  Meurin 
who  had  found  himself  too  old  and  feeble  to  perform  his 
arduous  duties  successfully.  Father  Gibault  during  the  years  of 
his  residence  had  gained  a  great  influence  over  the  people  of 
the  region,  which  he  used  at  a  critical  moment  to  change 
their  destiny.^ 

The  territory  of  Illinois  had  been  ceded  by  France  to  England 
by  the  Treaty  of  Paris  in  1763  and  two  years  later  British  troops 
had  occupied  the  coimtry.  The  policy  of  the  British  government 
was  very  vacillating  in  regard  to  the  Northwest  Territory,  and 
particularly  as  to  the  French  villages.  It  is  quite  evident  that 
there  was  no  purpose  of  opening  the  region  up  for  settlement, 
and  there  was  serious  thought  of  removing  the  French  from 
their  villages  to  Canada.^  For  this  reason  the  government  of 
England  was  unwilling  to  establish  a  permanent  civil  organiza- 
tion in  spite  of  the  efforts  of  the  French  inhabitants  and  the 
American  traders  and  land  speculators,  so  that  the  government 
remained  to  the  end  military.  Until  1774  the  whole  Northwest 
was  subject  to  the  commander  of  the  British  forces  in  America 
with  headquarters  at  New  York,  and  the  relations  of  the  West 
were  closest  with  the  seaboard  colonies.  In  that  year,  however,  by 
the  passage  of  the  Quebec  Act  the  country  was  joined  to  Canada 

*  Babeau,  Le  village  sous  Vancien  regime,  passim. 

^  Shea,,  Archbishop  CarroW,  consult  Index;  Dunn,  Father  Gibault,  in  Transactions  of 
the  111.  State  Hist.  Soc,  for  1905. 

'  Gage  to  Hillsborough,  March  4,  1772,  Spark's  Collection,  Harvard  lib. 


xxvi  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

and  steps  were  taken  to  provide  a  civil  government  for  it;  but 
this  was  prevented  by  the  outbreak  of  the  Revolutionary 
War. 

In  the  spring  of  1776  the  military  force,  which  had  been 
maintained  in  the  Illinois  was  removed,  and  the  commandant  in 
charge  appointed  as  British  agent  Philippe  de  Rastel,  Chevalier 
de  Rocheblave.  The  choice  was  a  wise  one.  Rocheblave  had 
had  a  long  and  varied  experience  in  the  West,  had  served  as  an 
officer  in  the  French  army  during  the  French  and  Indian  War, 
and  at  the  conclusion  of  peace  had  taken  refuge,  as  did  many 
other  Frenchmen,  under  the  Spanish  flag.  He  was  entrusted 
with  the  government  of  Ste.  Genevieve,  but  having  become 
involved  in  legal  difficulties  with  the  Spanish  officials,  he 
returned  to  the  British  bank.  The  exact  date  of  his  return  is 
uncertain,  but  the  proceedings  against  him  in  the  Spanish  court 
occurred  in  October,  1773,  so  that  he  could  have  been  at  longest 
a  little  over  two  years  in  British  Illinois,  when  he  received  his 
appointment  to  look  after  the  British  interests  in  the  western 
country.  In  his  various  undertakings  he  had  proved  himself 
bold  and  resourceful,  avaricious  and  not  too  scrupulous  in  his 
methods,  and  by  nature  suspicious.  He  knew  well  the  nature  of 
the  French  inhabitants,  and  had  a  dislike  and  deep-seated  suspi- 
cion of  the  Spaniards.  His  ambition  was  such  as  to  lead  him  to 
give  his  best  service  to  his  employers,  and  they  in  turn  had  confi- 
dence in  his  abilities  and  willingness  to  serve  them.  On  August 
13,  1777,  Carleton  wrote  that  "his  abilities  and  knowledge  of  that 
part  of  the  country  recommended  him  to  me  as  a  fit  person."^ 
Hamilton  says  of  him,  "I  shall  in  my  correspondence  with  Mr. 
de  Rocheblave  keep  alive  the  hopes  of  his  being  Governor  of  New 
Orleans  —  a  more  active  and  intelligent  Person  is  not  to  be  found 
in  This  Country  of  ignorant  Bigots,  and  busy  rebels,  and  had 
he  the  means  I  doubt  not  of  his  curbing  their  insolence  and 
disaffection."-  The  intimation  in  Hamilton's  letter  was  cor- 
rect   enough;     for,    although    the    inhabitants    treated    Roche- 

1  Mason,  Rocheblave  Papers,  in  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  395. 
^  Can.  Archives,  Q.,  14,  p.  74. 


Z&'tS.^^*^^'^*'*'-^;^;— ^ 


Philippe  Fran9ois  de  Rastel,  Chevalier  de 

Rocheblave,  Acting  Commander  and 

Judge  in  the  Illinois,  1 776-1 778. 

From  a  photograph  of  a  miniature,  in  the  State 
Historical  Library  of  Wisconsin. 


INTRODUCTION  xxvii 

blave  as  commandant  and  judge,  his  powers  as  agent  were 
too  limited  and  the  money  allowed  him  insufficient  to  enable 
him  to  accomplish  what  he  saw  was  necessary  for  the  British 
cause.  Time  and  again  he  was  informed  that  he  could  only 
draw  for  his  salary  and  that  his  expenses  were  to  be  met 
by  the  sums  which  the  commandant  at  Vincennes  could  allow 
him.^ 

By  what  law  other  officials  were  exercising  civil  powers  in  the 
Illinois  does  not  appear  from  the  records,  but  the  existence  of 
such  is  proved  from  their  acts.  There  were  at  Cahokia,  St. 
Philippe,  Kaskaskia,  and  Prairie  du  Rocher  officers  styling  them- 
selves judges,  who  put  in  execution  the  decrees  of  the  comman- 
dant. Since  at  the  same  time  these  judges  were  captains  of  the 
militia,  it  is  probable  that  the  French  official  with  similar  duties 
was  retained  by  the  British  officers.  Besides  this  judge  or  captain 
there  were  a  sergeant  and  a  notary  in  each  of  the  districts  of  Caho- 
kia and  Kaskaskia.^ 

The  foregoing  description  of  conditions  in  British  Illinois  would 
be  far  from  complete  without  an  account  of  one  very  important 
element  of  the  society.  No  sooner  had  the  news  gone  forth  that  the 
land  to  the  north  of  the  Ohio  River  had  been  ceded  to  England  by 
the  French  than  the  merchants  of  the  seaboard  colonies  began  to 
compete  for  the  fur-trade  of  the  region  in  a  way  that  had  been 
impossible  hitherto.  Up  to  this  time  the  principal  trade  in  the 
Illinois  had  been  conducted  by  Canadian  and  Louisiana  mer- 
chants, the  English  colonists  having  found  their  way  north  of  the 
Ohio  only  just  previous  to  the  outbreak  of  the  last  war.  But  now 
the  opportunity  was  opened  to  the  eastern  merchants  and  they 
eagerly  seized  upon  it,  thus  bringing  on  a  commercial  war  for 
the  trade  of  the  Ohio  and  the  Mississippi.  In  this  the  mer- 
chants of  the  English  colonies  had  one  decided  advantage,  since, 
they  could  deliver  goods  at  the  villages  of  the  Illinois  cheaper  than 

1  The  most  important  documents  in  the  Haldimand  Collection  concerning  Rocheblave 
have  been  printed  by  Mason  in  Chi.  Hist.  Soc's  Col.  iv.  Others  have  been  published  in 
Mich.  Pioneer  and  Hist.  Col.  vols,  iii.,  v.,  vii.,  and  ix. 

2  The  subject  of  the  British  administration  is  now  under  investigation  and  in  the  course 
of  time  something  definite  will  be  said  about  it.  For  the  above  facts  I  have  drawn  on  the 
Kas.  Rec. 


xxviii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

the  same  could  be  purchased  and  brought  by  way  of  the  lakes 
and  the  Wabash  or  up  the  Mississippi.^ 

The  British  soldiers  were  hardly  established  in  Fort  de  Char- 
tres  before  the  merchants  who  made  their  starting  place  Fort 
Pitt  had  arrived.  Among  the  first  was  one  who  was  to  exercise 
great  influence  on  the  development  of  the  Illinois,  George  Mor- 
gan, who  like  the  majority  of  traders  from  the  East  came  from 
Philadelphia.  He  had  been  educated  at  Princeton  and  had  then 
entered  the  firm  of  the  Bayntons,  which  became  better  known 
in  the  West  under  its  later  name  of  Baynton,  Wharton  &  Morgan.^ 
Although  young,  by  his  enthusiasm  he  had  persuaded  his  part- 
ners to  embark  on  western  trade  and  land  speculation,  and  they 
established  branch  stores  at  Kaskaskia,  Cahokia,  and  Vincennes. 
Other  firms  also  entered  into  competition,  such  as  the  firm  of 
Franks  &  Company  of  London  and  Philadelphia,  whose  repre- 
sentative, William  Murray,  was  a  little  later  than  Morgan  in 
reaching  the  Illinois.  About  the  same  time  an  Englishman, 
who  claimed  Manchac  in  Mississippi  as  his  home,  established 
the  firm  of  Bentley  &  Company.  These  and  other  companies 
brought  with  them  many  agents,  clerks,  and  hunters,  so  that  the 
list  of  names  of  men  of  English  speech  in  the  region  became  a 
long  one.  In  1768  Morgan  writes  that  there  were  sixty  English- 
men in  a  militia  company  which  had  been  formed.  Among  them 
were  many  names  which  will  be  mentioned  in  the  following  pages. 
John  Henson  was  the  representative  of  Baynton,  Wharton  & 
Morgan  at  Cahokia,  Richard  Winston  set  up  in  business  for  him- 
self in  partnership  with  Patrick  Kennedy,  and  the  firm  became 
later  the  representative  of  Morgan's  interests  at  Kaskaskia; 
Richard  Bacon  served  Morgan  in  his  farming  enterprise;   others, 

1  Fraser's  Report,  MS.  copy  in  public  library  of  Champaign,  III.;  Smith,  St.  Clair 
Papers,  ii.,  175;  Letter-Book  of  George  Morgan,  1767-1768.  This  last  belongs  to  Mr.  A.  S. 
M.  Morgan  of  Pittsburgh,  Pa.,  who  kindly  loaned  it  to  me.  A  copy  may  be  found  in  the 
111.  State  Hist.  Library.  See  also  Franz,  Die  Kolonisation  des  Mississippitales,  268  et  scq. 
The  cost  of  transportation  up  the  Mississippi  was,  however,  cheaper.  CoUot,  Voyage  dans 
L'Amerique,  ii.,  263.  Lieutentant  Hutchins  in  an  enclosuse  in  a  letter  of  General  Gage's, 
October  it,  1771,  and  Captain  Forbes  in  an  undated  letter  affirm  the  contrary  to  the  state- 
ment in  the  text;  but  Colonel  Wilkins  disagrees  with  them  and  confirms  the  experience  of 
the  trader,  George  Morgan.  The  letters  are  found  in  the  Bancroft  Collection  of  MSS., 
Lennox  Library,  N.  Y. 

2.  Letter-Book  of  George  Morgan;  Julia  Morgan  Harding,  Colonel  George  Morgan,  a 
paper  read  before  the  Washington  (Pa.)  Co.  Hist.  Soc.  and  printed  in  the  Washington 
Observer,  May  21,  1904. 


INTRODUCTION  xxix 

either  men  attached  to  one  of  the  firms  or  independent  traders,  were 
Daniel  Murray,  brother  of  WiUiam,  James  Rumsey,  Thomas 
Collins,  Thomas  Brady,  and  Richard  McCarty.  In  the  first 
years  of  the  British  rule  it  looked  as  if  the  Ohio  River  would 
become  the  great  trade  route  of  the  region  and  supplant  the 
older  and,  with  the  French,  more  popular  waterways  to  New 
Orleans  and  Canada.^  Even  the  British  government  seems  to 
have  approved  at  first  this  attempt  to  turn  aside  the  trade 
from  its  older  channels,  for  in  1769  the  colonial  governments 
were  empowered  to  appoint  officers  to  superintend  the  Indian 
trade,  and  Fort  Pitt  and  the  Illinois  were  assigned  to  Pennsyl- 
vania.^ Thus  the  Indians  north  of  the  Ohio  became  accustomed 
to  Fort  Pitt  as  the  seat  of  authority  in  matters  in  which  they  were 
vitally  interested. 

The  fur- trade  was  not  the  only  inducement  to  draw  the  Ameri- 
can colonists  to  the  banks  of  the  Mississippi,  for  from  the  first  the 
opportunity  to  speculate  in  lands  was  a  rival  attraction.  Land 
traders  were  early  interested  in  the  territory  at  the  head-waters 
of  the  Ohio  and  soon  foimd  their  way  down  the  river.  In  this 
movement  some  of  the  most  prominent  men  in  America  were 
interested,  such  as  George  Washington,  Lord  Dunmore,  and  the 
Franklins,  father  and  son.  The  Illinois  lands  offered  equal 
attractions  and  early  became  an  object  of  speculation,  in  spite 
of  the  Edict  of  1763  prohibiting  settlements  in  the  region.  It 
is  impossible  to  enter  into  the  complicated  questions  connected 
with  the  attempt  to  open  up  Illinois  by  making  it  a  new  colony.^ 
It  is  sufficient  to  know  that  many  prominent  men  were  con- 
nected with  all  such  schemes,  and  that  while  William  Franklin, 
Sir  William  Johnson,  Samuel  Wharton,  and  others  were  seeking 
for  a  charter  for  the  Illinois  colony  and  Benjamin  Franklin  was 
employing  his  powers  to  persuade  the  British  government  to  grant 
the  same,  there  was  formed  in  March,  1766,  a  company  for  the 

1  The  evidence  for  this  is  found  in  the  Letter-Book  of  George  Morgan  and  the  Kas.  Rec; 
see  also  Moses,  Court  of  Inquiry,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc's  Col.,  iv. 

2  N.  Y.  State  Library  Bulletin  No.  58,  Cal.  of  Council  Minutes,  letter  of  General  Gage, 
March  29,  1769. 

3  See  Alden,  New  Governments  west  of  the  Alleghanies  before  1780. 


XXX  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

purchase  of  land  near  the  French  villages,  of  which  George 
Morgan  was  the  representative  in  the  Illinois.  Although  several 
strips  of  land  were  bought,  nothing  of  any  moment  was  accom- 
plished by  this  company.^  However,  another  known  as  the  Illi- 
nois Land  Company,  most  of  the  members  of  which  were  Phila- 
delphians,  acquired  in  1773  through  its  representative,  William 
Murray,  two  large  tracts,  one  situated  on  the  Illinois  River  and 
the  other  south  of  Kaskaskia  on  the  Ohio.  Two  years  later,  the 
Wabash  Land  Company,  the  members  of  which  lived  for  the 
most  part  in  Maryland,  purchased  through  its  representative, 
the  Kaskaskian  Louis  Viviat,  an  associate  of  Murray,  two 
tracts  on  the  Wabash,  one  above  and  the  other 'below  Vincennes. 
Since  both  purchases  were  made  from  the  Indians  and  contrary 
to  the  Edict  of  1763,  they  were  not  allowed  by  the  British  govern- 
ment and  were  annulled  by  General  Gage.^  When  the  American 
Revolution  broke  out,  most  of  the  purchasers  sided  with  the 
colonists  and  looked  to  the  success  of  their  cause  to  further  the 
enterprise  in  the  West. 

Although  there  was  at  times  considerable  complaint  against 
the  British  commandants  by  the  merchants  and  land-traders,  these 
were  generally  favored  more  than  the  French  inhabitants  or  the 
Canadians,  imtil  the  passage  of  the  Quebec  Act  in  1774,  which 
united  the  Illinois  territory  with  the  province  of  Quebec  and 
annulled  any  special  favors  and  privileges  which  the  merchants 
from  the  East  may  have  enjoyed.  This  act  and  the  canceling  of 
the  land  purchases,  which  proved  the  intention  of  the  British 
government  to  carry  out  the  principles  enunciated  in  the 
Edict  of  1763,  were  discouraging  to  the  enterprises  of  the  repre- 

1  The  purchases  of  several  pieces  of  land  and  the  grants  of  others  by  Colonel  Wilkins, 
commandant,  were  recorded  in  the  record-book  of  the  district.  (Kas.  Rec.)  The  agreement 
creating  the  land  company  is  in  the  library  of  the  Hist.  Soc.  of  Pennsylvania.  The  original 
members  were  William  Franklin,  Sir  William  Johnson,  George  Croghan,  John  Baynton, 
Samuel  Wharton,  George  Morgan,  Joseph  Wharton,  Joseph  Wharton,  Jr.,  John  Hughes,  and 
Joseph  Galloway.  The  firm  of  Baynton,  Wharton  &  Morgan  received  a  concession  of  a 
large  tract  of  land  in  the  American  Bottom  from  Colonel  Wilkins  in  1 769 .  This  claim  passed 
into  the  hands  of  John  Edgar,  was  confirmed  by  Governor  St.  Clair,  but  was  rejected  by  the 
land  commissioners  of  the  U.S.     Amer.  State  Pap.,  Pub.  Lands,  ii.,  206. 

2  The  best  account  of  the  Illinois  and  the  Wabash  Land  companies  is  contained  in  a 
pamphlet  published  in  Philadelphia  in  1796  with  the  title,  Account  of  the  Proceedings  of  the 
Illinois  and  Ouabache  Land  companies.  Other  memorials  were  printed  in  later  years,  some 
of  which  may  be  found  in  Amer.  State  Pap.,  Pub.  Lands,  vols,  i  and  ii,  the  longest  in  vol.  ii., 
108  et  seq.     For  the  later  history  of  the  two  companies  see  post  p.  Ixx. 


INTRODUCTION  xxxi 

sentatives  of  the  Eastern  colonies,  and  from  that  date  their  number 
in  the  Illinois  began  to  decline  and  trade  turned  back  to  the 
older  channels.  The  next  men  of  English  speech  to  compete 
with  the  Spanish  and  French  merchants  for  this  western  trade 
were  representatives  of  the  new  British  Canadian  houses  which 
sprang  up  after  Canada  was  ceded  to  Great  Britain.  When  it 
is  remembered  that  the  persons  back  of  this  attempt  to  capture 
for  the  East  the  trade  of  the  old  Northwest  and  to  exploit  that 
territory  through  their  colonizing  schemes  were  some  of  the  most 
important  merchants  and  professional  men  in  the  seaboard  colonies, 
one  cause  of  the  opposition  among  the  Easterners  to  the  Quebec 
Act  is  easily  understood.^ 

The  entrance  of  the  American  colonists  into  the  Illinois  had 
two  results,  one  immediate  and  the  other  more  remote.  The 
trade  had  brought  into  the  French  villages  several  men  of  English 
speech,  who  for  one  cause  or  another  determined  to  remain ;  and 
their  presence  made  possible  continual  correspondence  between 
the  West  and  the  colonial  revolutionists;  and  at  the  same  time 
they  prepared  the  minds  of  the  French  to  receive  any  company 
of  American  soldiers  who  might  undertake  the  conquest  of  the 
country.  The  second  result  was  apparent  only  later.  The  men 
who  had  been  foiled  in  their  attempt  to  secure  the  trade  of  the 
old  Northwest  and  to  acquire  its  land  for  colonization  were  not 
willing  to  accept  the  decision  of  the  Quebec  Act  as  final,  and 
were  prepared  to  renew  the  attempt  at  the  first  opportunity  with 
the  chance  of  greater  success. 

Rocheblave  had  been  appointed  agent  for  the  British  a  year 
after  the  outbreak  of  the  American  Revolution,  and  from  the  first 
he  had  trouble  with  the  Americans  who  remained  m  the  villages 
and  who  generally  sympathized  with  the  cause  of  independence. 

1  For  a  discussion  of  the  Quebec  Act  see  Coffin,  The  Province  of  Quebec  and  the  Early 
American  Revolution.  The  decreased  number  of  Americans  from  the  eastern  colonies  is 
proved  by  a  careful  study  of  the  names  appearing  in  the  records.  Some  of  the  more  impor- 
tant men  are  known  to  have  left.  Morgan  left  before  1774.  probably  in  1770,  but  his  firm 
still  continued  to  conduct  business  in  the  IlUnois  until  about  i774-  William  Murray  left 
the  country  in  1776;  James  Rumsey  must  have  left  shortly  before.  The  Canadian  mer- 
chants began  to  appear  in  1777,  at  least  that  is  the  date  of  the  first  appearance  of  a  repre- 
sentative of  any  of  the  new  Scotch  firms  of  Canada  which  in  time  controlled  the  western  fur- 
trade.  After  the  close  of  the  American  Revolution  they  came  in  great  numbers.  See  post 
p.  cjdvii.;  J.  Bte.  Perrault's  Narrative,  in  Schoolcraft,  Indian  Antiquities,  pt.  3. 


xxxu  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

It  is  difficult  to  decide  to-day  where  justice  lay  in  the  con- 
stant disputes  between  the  two  parties,  for  the  endless  recrimi- 
nations which  they  hurled  at  each  other  were  surcharged  with 
personal  hatred  and  irreconcilable  hostility. 

The  first  cause  of  dispute  grew  out  of  the  trade  with  the  Indians. 
Every  government  in  the  West  has  been  forced  sooner  or  later  to 
attempt  to  regulate  the  sale  of  liquor  to  the  natives,  since  one  of 
the  chief  dangers  to  the  small  frontier  community  comes  from  in- 
toxicated savages.  Since  Rocheblave  was  without  authority,  he 
was  obliged  to  use  other  means  than  prohibition  to  regulate  this 
dangerous  trade ;  and  no  better  method  could  have  been  devised 
than  that  he  used.  In  a  community  practically  without  govern- 
ment like  that  of  the  Illinois,  public  opinion  alone  could  be  called 
into  play  to  prevent  an  evil  which  endangered  the  lives  of  all  alike. 
One  of  the  first  acts  of  Rocheblave  was  to  call  an  assembly  of  the 
inhabitants  on  April  17,  1776,  to  discuss  among  other  matters, 
all  questions  concerning  their  relations  with  the  Indians.  It 
was  decided  that,  since  some  savages  made  war  on  the  English 
and  some  on  the  French  and  since  both  realized  that  they  were 
under  one  government  and  were  all  brothers  and  must  hold 
together,  the  assembly  of  the  inhabitants  should  regulate  the  trade 
with  the  savages  from  time  to  time.  The  people  also  agreed  on 
their  honor  not  to  give  to  the  Indians  any  intoxicating  liquor,  and 
to  assemble  under  arms  when  the  commandant  gave  the  signal. 
At  the  same  assembly  it  was  determined  that,  if  any  one 
refused  to  pay  just  debts,  the  inhabitants  would  give  their  assis- 
tance to  the  government  to  enforce  such  payment.  The  agree- 
ment was  signed  by  all  the  prominent  Frenchmen  of  the  villages, 
but  by  only  one  Englishman,  Daniel  Murray.^  Later  this  agree- 
ment was  made  the  subject  of  reproach  against  Rocheblave  by 
one  of  the  English  merchants,  Bentley,  who  was  most  bitterly 
opposed  to  the  acting  commandant.  If  Rocheblave's  charges 
are  to  be  believed,  Bentley  and  his  associates  were  the  chief  offen- 
ders in  the  sale  of  liquor  to  the  Indians.^ 

1  Kas.  Rec.  Court  Record,  p.  82. 

2  Bentley  made  similar  charges  against  Rocheblave  and  accused  him  of  injus- 
tice and  tyranny.     Rocheblave  presented  his  case  before  a  court,  composed  of  the  militia 


INTRODUCTION  xxxiii 

It  was  not  the  liquor  traffic,  however,  which  caused  the  greatest 
difficulties  between  the  British  agent,  and  the  English-speakmg 
inhabitants  of  the  Illinois.  On  account  of  the  war  for  indepen- 
dence carried  on  by  the  seaboard  colonies  against  the  mother 
country,  the  western  territory  became  the  center  of  many  activi- 
ties directed  against  England,  of  which  Rocheblave  kept  him- 
self well  informed,  but  against  which  he  was  able  to  do  little  on 
account  of  the  apathy  of  the  British  government.  Across  the 
river  lay  the  Spanish  posts,  which,  since  the  appointment  of 
Galvez  as  governor  of  Spanish  Louisiana,  had  become  the  seat 
of  intrigues  against  England ;  for  the  Spanish  officials  of  America 
were  rather  quicker  in  perceiving  the  advantages  which  might 
be  gained  by  Spain  from  the  rupture  between  England  and  her 
colonies  than  was  the  home  government,  and  they  committed 
many  overt  acts  against  England  before  actual  war  was  declared 
by  Spain.  From  St.  Louis  and  New  Orleans  the  Americans  re- 
ceived very  substantial  aid.  At  the 'latter  city  was  Oliver  Pol- 
lock, who  was  the  American  agent  and  was  on  the  best  of  terms 
with  the  governor.  From  Fort  Pitt  boats  were  sent  to  New 
Orleans  for  supplies  of  all  kinds  and  these  boats  were  even  har- 
bored in  St.  Louis,  opposite  the  British  Illinois.^ 

The  English-speaking  merchants  of  Kaskaskia  participated 
in  these  acts  against  England  and  maintained  their  intercourse 
with  the  eastern  leaders  in  spite  of  the  watchfulness  of  Rocheblave. 
Bentley  and  others  traded  almost  openly  with  the  rebels.  When 
William  Linn  went  to  New  Orleans  to  obtain  powder  and  other 
supplies  for  the  Americans,  Bentley  met  him  on  the  Ohio  River 
and  sold  him  powder.  It  was  also  known  that  he  sent  a  boat 
to  Kentucky  for  the  same  purpose.  ^     The  chief  representative 

captains  of  Kaskaskia,  Prairie  du  Rocher  and  St.  Philippe,  which  heard  evidence  on  all  the 
charges  brought  against  the  acting  commandant  by  Bentley  and  acquitted  him  on  every 
count.  The  known  duplicity  of  Bentley  at  a  later  period  makes  his  testimony  more  than 
doubtful.  Kas.  Rec.  Court  Record,  fol.  loo  et  seq.;  Mich.  Pio.  and  Hist.  Col.  xix.,  324;  III. 
Hist.  Col.,  {.,  295. 

1  Winsor,  The  Westward  Movement,  108;  Gayarr6,  Hist,  of  Louisiana,  iii.,  109;  Roche- 
blave to  Hamilton,  May  8,  1777,  enclosed  in  Can.  Archives,  Q.,  14,  p.  51;  Rocheblave  to 
Haldimand,  November  9,  1780,  Ibid,  B.,  122,  p.  545;  letter  of  Rocheblave,  February  28, 
1778,  Ibid,  Q.,  IS,  p.  196;  Mason,  Rocheblave  Papers,  in  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collection,  iv., 
389,  393,  402,  407;  Morgan  to  George  Clymer,  March  2,  1778,  Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xv.,  317. 

3  In  the  court  appointed  by  Rocheblave  to  investigate  charges  against  himself  made 
by  Bentley,  several  Americans  and  Frenchmen,  who  were  lukewarm  in  their  support  of   the 


xxxiv  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

of  the  American  cause  in  the  West  was  George  Morgan,  who  in 
1776  was  appointed  agent  under  the  commissioners  for  Indian 
affairs  in  the  middle  department  and  made  his  headquarters 
at  Fort  Pitt.^  His  intimate  knowledge  of  the  West  and  his  many 
friends  among  the  French  and  Indians  made  his  selection  a  wise 
one;  and  he  was  able  to  make  some  opposition  to  the  activities 
of  Hamilton,  the  lieutenant-governor  of  Detroit.  Morgan  main- 
tained his  relations  with  his  agents  in  Kaskaskia,  Winston  and 
Kennedy,  and  with  other  correspondents  at  Detroit  and  elsewhere.^ 
In  a  letter  written  in  July,  1776,  he  says:  "I  am  now  here  on 
Public  Business  for  the  United  Colonies.  I  want  to  know  the 
exact  situation  of  affairs  at  the  Illinois  &  what  Quantity  of  flour 
&  beef  you  could  furnish  a  company  or  two  of  men  with  at  Kas- 
kaskia the  25th  of  next  December.  This  I  will  depend  on  you 
for  by  the  return  of  Silver  Heels  who  ought  to  be  at  Pittsburg  as 
early  in  September  as  possible  as  there  is  a  great  treaty  to  be  held 
in  that  month  with  all  the  western  Nations.  If  one  of  you 
could  come  along  with  him  it  may  be  much  to  your  advantage,  but 
you  should  be  very  secret  with  respect  to  your  Business."  There 
follows  an  order  for  horses  and  the  letter  ends  with  a  repetition 
of  his  request  that  one  of  the  partners  meet  him  in  Pittsburg.^ 
It  is  difficult  to  determine  whether  the  letter  is  more  than  a  busi- 
ness letter  or  not.  The  company  of  men  may  refer  to  some 
commercial  enterprise  that  was  contemplated;  but  Congress 
had  determined  in  the  previous  April  to  send  an  expedition 
against  Detroit  and  there  may  have  been  in  the  writer's  plans  a 
similar  one  against  the  Illinois.'* 

commandant,  testified  concerning  the  intercourse  between  the  East  and  the  Illinois.  (Kas. 
Rec,  Court  Record)  Bentley's  defense  may  be  found  in  the  documents  from  the  Handimand 
Collections  printed  in  Mich.  Pio.  and  Hist.  Col.  xix.,  321  et  seq.  and  ///.  Hist.  Col.,  i.,  295  et 
seq.     For  Linn's  expedition  see  Hall,  Romance  of  the  West. 

^  Winsor,  Westward  Movement,  go. 

2  In  a  letter  from  Rocheblave  to  Hamilton,  May  8,  1777,  occurs  the  following:  "It  has 
occurred  to  me  to  tell  you  that  the  spy,  named  Elliot,  whom  you  have  had  arrested  at  De- 
troit, was  the  bearer  of  a  letter  from  George  Morgan,  commissioner  for  Congress  and  general 
director  of  the  undertakings  which  are  made  from  Fort  Pitt  against  here,  to  Richard  Winston, 
a  very  zealous  partisan  of  the  same  cause."  (Letter  enclosed  in  Can.  Archives,  Q.,  vol.  14,  p. 
74.  See  also  letter  quoted  below.)  There  are  scattered  references  to  Morgan  in  the  Kas. 
Rec.  Very  late  in  my  investigations  I  learned  that  there  were  three  letter-books  of  George 
Morgan  in  the  Carnegie  Ubrary  of  Pittsburg,  Pa.  I  made  every  eflFort  to  have  search  made 
in  them  for  material,  which  would  throw  light  on  Morgan's  activities  in  the  West.  Through 
the  fault  of  no  one,  but  rather  on  account  of  the  shortness  of  the  time,  I  was  unsuccessful. 

^  Can.  Archives,  B.,  185,  pt.  2,  p.  549. 

*  Journal  of  Cont.  Cong.,  Lib.  of  Cong,  ed.,  iv.,  318. 


INTRODUCTION  xxxv 

Whatever  Morgan's  plans  may  have  been,  there  can  be  no 
doubt  about  the  behef  of  the  English-speaking  traders  in  the 
Illinois ;  for  they  were  expecting  that  he  would  soon  bring  about 
such  an  expedition.  They  talked  of  this  openly  among  themselves 
and  spoke  of  the  power  of  the  colonies  to  the  French,  to  whom 
they  pointed  out  the  advantages  of  a  change  of  alliance.  When 
William  Murray  left  Kaskaskia  in  the  year  1776,  he  instructed 
his  brother  Daniel  to  furnish  any  American  troops,  who  might 
come,  with  the  supplies  they  should  need ;  and  later  he  sent  word 
from  New  Orleans  by  Colonel  George  Gibson,  to  the  same 
effect;  instructions  which  Daniel  carried  out,  when  George 
Rogers  Clark  arrived  in  1778.  On  June  7,  1778,  Richard  Mc- 
Carty  of  Cahokia  wrote  to  John  Askins  of  Michillimackinac : 
"  It  is  said  that  Morgan  was  to  be  here  with  600  men  last  winter, 
but  very  likely  he  has  something  else  to  do."^ 

In  the  midst  of  these  intrigues  Rocheblave  was  not  strong 
enough  to  do  more  than  to  memorialize  the  government  at  Quebec. 
Even  when  he  had  proved  against  Bentley  the  charge  of  selling 
goods  to  the  colonies,  he  did  not  dare  to  arrest  him  in  Kas- 
kaskia,^ for  although  at  the  beginning  of  his  administration  he 
had  been  able  to  unite  all  the  French  in  his  support,  there  had 
developed  two  parties,  one  of  which  showed  signs  of  opposing 
him.  The  American  merchants  had  not  lived  so  many  years  in 
the  villages  of  the  Illinois  without  making  friends  among  the 
French,  nor  were  the  latter  wholly  without  longings  for  liberty 
and  aspirations  for  greater  independence.  It  was  only  eight  years 
before  this  that  they  had  commissioned  their  friend  and  neighbor, 
Daniel  Bloiiin,  to  present  to  the  British  government  their  wishes 
for  a  civil  establishment  to  replace  the  military  tyranny  from  which 
they  suffered.^    That  movement  had  caused  excited  discussions 

1  Kas.  Rec,  Court  Record,  fol.  loo  et  seq;  Murray's  instructions  to  his  brother  may  be 
found  in  a  memorial  by  Daniel  Murray,  Va.  State  Papers,  ii.,  675;  McCarty's  letter  in  Can. 
Archives,  B.,  97,  vol.,  i.,  p.  6. 

2  Bentley  was  arrested  at  Michillimackinac  and  carried  to  Quebec,  where  he  was  kept  in 
confinement  until  his  escape  in  1780,  when  he  returned  to  Illinois  to  take  his  revenge,  as 
the  later  narrative  will  tell.  See  post,  p.  cxlv.  The  more  important  papers  in  regard  to  the  ar- 
rest of  Bentley  have  been  pubUshed  in  the  Mich.  Pioneer  and  Hist.  Col.,  xix.,  321  c/  seq.  His 
intercourse  with  the  Kentuckians  is  further  proved  by  the  fact  that  Clark  made  efforts  to  have 
Bentley  exchanged,     Clark  to  Lemoult,  March  16,  1779,  111.  Hist.  Col.,  i.,  415. 

'  Mason,  Chapters  from  Illinois  Hist.,  281.  Much  new  material  on  this  event  has  been 
discovered,  which  will  be  made  known  in  time. 


xxxvi  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

in  the  villages  at  the  time,  and  most  of  the  French  could  recall  the 
principles,  without  doubt  largely  inspired  by  the  Eastern  traders 
among  them,  for  which  they  had  then  struggled. 

It  is  true  that  these  same  villagers  later  told  Clark  that  they 
had  not  understood  the  cause  for  which  the  colonies  were  fighting. 
But  this  was  given  as  an  excuse  for  not  having  joined  the  American 
cause  earlier,  for  they  certainly  were  not  so  ignorant  nor  so  art- 
less as  they  chose  to  appear  to  the  leader  of  an  army  of  backwoods- 
men. Many  had  seen  the  broadsides  sent  by  the  Americans  to 
Canada.  Their  intercourse  through  trade  with  Kentucky  and 
Fort  Pitt  had  brought  the  knowledge  to  others,  and  such  men  as 
Winston,  Kennedy,  and  the  Murrays  had  been  preaching  the  joys 
of  independence  for  years.  Many  of  the  French  were  also  warm 
friends  and  admirers  of  that  enthusiast  for  the  American  cause, 
George  Morgan.  It  is,  therefore,  not  strange  that  many  gave 
Rocheblave  a  half-hearted  support,  although  they  were  not 
ready  to  come  out  openly  on  the  side  of  the  American  agents.^ 
Among  these  more  or  less  disaffected  Frenchmen  must  be  counted 
some  of  the  most  important  men  of  the  communities,  such  as 
Father  Gibault,  the  Charlevilles,  the  Bauvais,  Bienvenus,  Lafont, 
Duplasy  and  Janis  of  Kaskaskia,  and  J.  Bte.  Barbau,  who 
controlled  Prairie  du  Rocher.  How  Rocheblave  was  regarded 
at  Cahokia  is  not  known.  The  captains  of  militia,  Joseph 
Cesirre  and  Francois  Trottier,  had  not  chosen  to  participate  in 
the  court,  which  the  acting  commandant  called  to  clear  himself 
of  the  charges  made  by  Bentley ;  but  this  may  have  been  due  to 
hindrances  rather  than  choice.  The  men  composing  this  party 
were  among  the  most  intelligent  of  the  villagers;  they  had  all 
given  their  support  to  the  demand  for  the  civil  government  from 
the  British  in  1770,  and  among  them  were  the  officers  of  the 
militia,  as  Duplasy,  Janis,  and  Barbau. 

1  The  above  analysis  of  the  conditions  in  Illinois  in  the  year  1778  is  based  upon  hints 
from  many  sources  and  events  which  followed  the  arrival  of  George  Rogers  Clark,  so  that 
it  is  impossible  to  refer  to  any  one  document  or  group  of  documents  as  proof.  The  statement 
of  the  French  to  Clark  in  regard  to  their  ignorance  of  the  cause  of  the  struggle  is  in  Clark's 
letter  to  Mason  and  his  Memoir,  Enghsh,  Conquest  0}  the  Northwest,  i.,  417  and  480.  In  the 
Memoir,  (p.  475)  Clark  intimates  that  he  found  some  of  the  French  inclined  to  the  American 
cause.  Cerre,  of  whom  I  speak  below,  is  one  of  the  men  who  claims  not  to  have  had  the 
opportunity  to  understand  the  cause  for  which  the  Americans  struggled,  but  no  one  can 
read  the  letter  written  him  by  Monforton  on  Sept.  22,  1778,  without  believing  that  Cerr^'s 


INTRODUCTION  xxxvii 

The  mass  of  the  habitants  were  probably  on  the  side  of  the 
government.^  Illiterate  and  unintelligent,  they  were  willing  to 
accept  conditions  as  they  found  them  without  attempting  to  bring 
about  a  change;  and,  besides,  obedience  to  the  constituted 
authorities  was  part  of  their  nature.  There  were,  however,  sev- 
eral of  the  richest  and  most  prominent  Frenchmen  upon  whom 
the  acting  commandant  could  count,  whose  loyalty  to  the  British 
cause  and  Rocheblave  was  far  stronger  than  the  attachment  of 
their  opponents  to  the  opposition.  Among  these  were  Gabriel 
Cerre,  Louis  Viviat,  and  Nicolas  Lachance  of  Kaskaskia.  Viviat 
should,  perhaps,  not  be  comited  at  this  time,  for  he  died  in  the 
fall  of  1777 ;  but  up  to  the  time  of  his  death,  he  was  one  of  the 
most  important  traders  of  the  region  and  had  been  in  partnership 
with  William  Murray.  He  was  the  member  of  the  Wabash  Land 
Company  who  acted  as  the  agent  in  the  purchase  of  its  claim. 
He  had,  however,  severed  his  connection  with  Murray  just  pre- 
vious to  his  death,  because  of  the  acts  of  Daniel  Murray,  who  was 
particularly  lawless.  Throughout  the  prosecution  of  Bentley  by 
Rocheblave,  Viviat  had  given  the  latter  his  support.^  Of  La- 
chance  little  at  this  time  is  known  except  that  he  was  accounted 
a  friend  of  Rocheblave.^  Unquestionably  the  most  important 
member  of  the  government  party  was  Gabriel  Cerre.  He  was 
forty-four  years  old  and  had  been  in  Kaskaskia  since  1755. 
Through  his  personal  wealth  and  commercial  connections,  he 
exercised  an  influence  over  the  villagers  second  only  to  that  of 
the  commandant,  with  whom  he  was  on  terms  of  intimacy.  It 
is  quite  possible  that  his  trading  interests  brought  him  into  oppo- 

correspondent  gave  him  credit  for  an  intelligent  understanding  of  the  claims  of  the  two  parties. 
(Can.  Archives,  B.,  122,  p.  161.)  Daniel  Murray  in  writing  to  Bentley  on  May  25,  1777, 
gives  the  following  proof  of  the  existence  of  parties  among  the  French:  "As  to  your  being 
complained  of  already  to  General  Carleton  you  need  not  dread  that,  for  since  your  departure 
Rocheblave  drew  out  a  complaint  against  you  and  wanted  all  the  principal  Inhabitants  to 
sign  it  which  they  all  absolutely  refused  to  do,  particularly  the  Charlevilles,  Bienvenue, 
Lafont,  Plassey,  Janist,  etc.,  no  doubt  but  your  friends  Viviat  Cerr6  Lachance  might  have 
done  it  but  they  are  too  few  to  countenance  it  when  so  many  refused  to  do  it."  (Mich.  Pio.^ 
and  Hist.  Col.,  xix.,  417.)  Scattered  through  the  Court  Record,  Kas.  Rec.  are  other  indica- 
tions of  party  di\dsions. 

^  Clark  in  his  Memoir  says  that  the  majority  of  the  inhabitants  were  friendly  to  Cerr^, 
the  leader  of  the  British  party.    English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  i.,  485. 

2  Kas.  Rec,  Court  Record.    See  also  supra,  p.  xxx. 

3  See  supra,  p.  xxxvi.,  note  i. 


xxxviii         ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

sition  to  the  Americans  and  that  self  interest  bound  him  to  the 
British  side.^ 

Rocheblave  never  deceived  himself  in  regard  to  the  weakness 
of  his  position,  and  several  times  urged  upon  Governor  Carleton 
the  appointment  of  a  commandant  and  the  sending  to  the  Illinois 
of  British  troops,  a  recommendation  which  proves  his  interest 
in  the  cause  he  upheld  and  his  own  disinterestedness.  His 
letters  are  full  of  such  expressions  as  these :  "  I  await  with  the 
greatest  impatience  the  orders  of  your  excellency,  or  rather  I  beg 
of  you  to  give  them  to  some  other  person,  a  native  Englishman,  in 
order  to  escape  the  too  common  jealousies  of  some,  who  having 
merely  the  name,  and  whose  affections  are  all  for  the  Americans, 
are  seeking  to  thwart  all  my  efforts,  intriguing  with  our  neighbors 
and  poisoning  with  the  venom  of  their  hearts  the  purest  intentions. 

All  the  alarms  I  have  sought  to  give  will  be  only  too  well 

realized.  We  are  upon  the  eve  of  seeing  here  a  numerous  band 
of  brigands  who  will  establish  a  chain  of  communications  which 
will  not  be  easy  to  break,  once  formed.  If  by  the  schemes  of  the 
Spanish  the  Natchez  are  conquered,  there  will  be  established  an 
armed  force  in  this  country.  You  have  no  time  to  lose  to  prevent 
this  misfortune.  If  militia  can  be  counted  for  anything  at  present 
a  person  of  discretion  with  troops  would  attract  more  adherents 
than  would  be  believed.  Inclination  is  in  spite  of  abandonment 
and  distress,  still  for  the  government,  but  it  is  more  than  time  to 
revive  their  drooping  courage  or  all  will  be  lost  here."^  The 
British  government  planned  at  one  time  to  relieve  him  and 
appointed,  in  1777,  Matthew  Johnson  lieutenant-governor  of  the 
Illinois;  but  for  some  reason  he  never  went  to  his  post,^  and 
Rocheblave  was  compelled  to  face  the  event  concerning  which 
he  had  given  so  frequent  warnings,  and  to  learn  that  the  party 
of  his  opponents  was  stronger  in  a  crisis  than  his  own. 

*  For  an  account  of  Cerre,  see  p.  xx.,  note  2. 

2  Rocheblave  to  Carleton,  July  4,  1778,  translated  in  Mason,  Rocheblave  Papers,  Chi. 
Hist.  Soc.'s.  Collections,  iv.,  416. 

3  Can.  Archives,  B.,  vol.  46,  p.  95.  From  Murray's  letter  to  Bentley,  May  25,  i777i  it 
is  learne\l  that  the  new  governor  was  expected  at  Kaskaskia,  Mich.  Pio.  and  Htst.  Cal.,  xix., 
417. 


INTRODUCTION  xxxix 

The  American  attack  on  the  villages  of  the  Illinois  did  not 
come  about  in  the  way  that  the  inhabitants  and  Rocheblave  had 
anticipated.  They  had  been  led  to  look  for  an  expedition  sent 
by  the  united  colonies  and  directed  by  George  Morgan  against 
the  whole  line  of  posts  extending  from  Detroit  to  Kaskaskia ;  but 
what  actually  occurred  was  that  one  of  the  revolting  states,  Vir- 
ginia, sent  an  isolated  detachment  under  a  pioneer  of  Kentucky 
to  revenge  the  British  and  Indian  attacks  on  her  frontiers.^  The 
immediate  occasion  of  this  expedition  was  the  rapid  colonization 
of  Kentucky  during  the  last  four  years,  and  the  danger  to  the  new 
settlements  from  the  detachments  of  Indians  sent  by  Lieutenant 
Governor  Hamilton  of  Detroit.  To  the  Kentuckians  the  whole 
territory  north  of  the  Ohio  River  appeared  the  breeding  ground 
of  these  Indian  incursions  into  their  territory.  The  con- 
ception of  an  attack  upon  the  Illinois  was  due  to  the  genius  of 
one  man,  George  Rogers  Clark,  who  clearly  perceived  that  the 
holding  of  Kentucky  depended  on  checking  the  British  power 
to  the  north.  He  laid  his  plan  before  the  governor  and  council 
of  Virginia,  by  whom  it  was  approved.^  He  then  proceeded  to 
raise  his  troops,  keeping  the  destination  of  the  expedition  as 
secret  as  possible.  Had  he  taken  into  consultation  George 
Morgan  or  some  of  the  men  associated  with  him,  he  could  easily 
have  put  himself  into  communication  with  the  American  party  in 
the  Illinois.  On  account  of  this  silence  he  never  fully  imder- 
stood  the  conditions  existing  in  the  French  villages.  He  had  pre- 
ferred to  work  by  himself  and  had  collected  his  own  information. 
In  1777  he  had  sent  two  spies,  S.  More  and  B.  Linn,  to  Kaskaskia 
to  investigate  the  situation.  They  remained  in  the  villages  some 
time,  giving  themselves  out  as  hunters;  but  they  failed  to 
get  into  communication  with  the  leaders  of  the  opposition  to 
Rocheblave,  because  Clark  had  not  informed  even  his  spies  of  his 

*  See  the  statement  of  the  people  of  Cahokia  concerning  their  idea  of  Clark's  troops, 
this  volume,  p.  539.  I  have  found  no  evidence  that  George  Morgan  had  any  knowledge  of 
Clark's  undertaking. 

2  This  is  not  the  place  for  an  account  of  military  actions,  nor  have  I  considered  it  neces- 
sary to  repeat  what  is  contained  in  Clark's  own  narratives,  which  have  been  so.  frequently 
exploited  by  historians  and  novelists  that  they  are  very  familiar.  His  Letter  to  Mason  and 
his  Memoir  have  been  printed  in  English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  \.,  /^ii  et  seq. 


xl  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

purpose.  1  It  was  evidently  expected  by  the  American  traders  of 
Kaskaskia  that  they  would  learn  something  from  these  Kentucky 
hunters,  for  Bentley,  who  was  absent,  wrote  to  Murray  concern- 
ing them;  but  the  latter  answered:  "As  to  the  hunters  you 
write  of  there  is  three  of  them,  one  of  them  was  here  before,  his 
name  Benjm  Lynn,  but  they  bring  no  news  that  I  can  hear  of 
worth  reporting." 2  According  to  Clark's  account  of  their  in- 
vestigation given  to  Patrick  Henry,  the  governor  of  Virginia, 
they  reported  that:  "The  principal  inhabitants  are  entirely 
against  the  American  cause,  and  look  on  us  as  notorious  rebels 
that  ought  to  be  subdued  at  any  rate,  but  I  don't  doubt  but  after 
being  acquainted  with  the  cause  they  would  become  good  friends 
to  it."^  There  has  been  preserved,  however,  another  account 
according  to  which  they  reported  that  there  were :  "  Strong  traces 
of  affection  for  the  Americans,  among  some  of  the  inhabitants."* 
There  is  also  a  tradition  that  Linn  was  warned  by  a  trader  of  an 
attack  planned  by  some  Indians  against  himself  and  companion.^ 
The  history  of  Clark's  journey  down  the  Ohio,  of  his  landing 
near  Fort  Massac,  and  of  the  march  across  the  prairies  is  so  well 
known  that  it  need  not  be  retold ;  but  the  events  occurring  at 
Kaskaskia  which  made  his  success  possible  are  less  familiar. 
The  states  had  sent  down  the  Mississippi,  in  the  spring  of  the  year, 
an  expedition  under  Willing  to  make  attacks  on  the  British  posts 
in  the  south.  The  course  of  this  expedition,  Rocheblave  had 
followed  with  interest  and,  as  he  heard  of  the  depredations  Willing 
made  upon  property,  he  published  the  accounts  to  the  villagers  in 
order  to  cause  them  to  fear  for  their  own.^  When  he  learned  that 
another  expedition  was  on  the  Ohio  directed  against  the  Illinois, 
he  connected  it  with  the  Willing  raid  and  saw  in  it  an  attempt 
on  the  part  of  the  Americans  to  gain  control  of  the  whole  stretch 

1  Letter  by  Clark,  Amer.  Hist.  Rev.,  viii.,  492. 

2  Murray  to  Bentley,  May  25,  1777,  Mich.  Pio.  and  Hist.  Col.,  xix.,  417.    There  is  a  slight 
mistake  in  the  date  given  by  Clark  who  says  he  sent  them  in  June. 

3  Letter  by  Clo-xk," Amer.  Hist.  Rev.,  viii.,  492. 
*  Butler,  History  of  Kentucky,  46. 

5  Tradition  preserved  in  Linn's  family.  Dr.  MSS.,  18J51. 

•"'Mason,  Rocheblave  Papers,  in  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Co^/cciio«5,  iv.,  408,  410.  412  et  seq. 


INTRODUCTION  xli 

of  the  river.  This  news  of  the  approach  of  Clark  did  not  reach  him 
much  before  that  officer  was  at  the  falls  and  possibly  not  before 
he  had  landed  at  Massac  creek.  Rocheblave  immediately 
ordered  out  the  miHtia  to  make  preparations  for  resistance; 
but  he  soon  learned  the  strength  of  the  party  opposed  to  him, 
for  the  American  traders  in  Kaskaskia  either  persuaded  the  in- 
habitants not  to  attempt  repelling  the  invaders,  and  in  this  they 
were  aided  by  the  Spanish  emissaries,  or  else  they  quieted  the 
fears  of  an  attack.  Whatever  occurred,  Rocheblave  found  that 
he  could  accomplish  nothing,  for  his  government  was  by  per- 
suasion rather  than  by  command,  and  the  militia  officers  were 
members  of  the  party  that  gave  lukewarm  support  to  the  British 
and  was  half  incHned  to  the  American  cause.  Unfortunately  for 
Rocheblave,  his  chief  supporters  were  not  with  him  at  this  crisis ; 
Viviat  had  died  in  the  preceding  fall,  Lachance  had  recently  been 
taken  prisoner,^  and  Cerre  had  just  started  with  some  furs  for 
Michillimackinac.  Hoping  that  the  sight  of  a  reinforcement 
coming  to  their  assistance  might  arouse  the  inhabitants,  Roche- 
blave sent  a  messenger  to  summon  the  militia  from  Vincennes ; 
and  M.  Legras  actually  started  with  forty  men  from  that  village  to 
assist  Kaskaskia.  The  message  had  come  too  late,  however,  for 
Clark  landed  at  Massac  creek,  marched  across  country,  and  cut 
off  any  help  which  might  be  rendered  from  the  Wabash.  Thus 
the  crisis,  whicli  Rocheblave  had  been  prophesying,  arrived,  and 
he  found  himself  unable  to  make  any  resistance.^ 

1  Rocheblave  to  Bosseron,  April  25,  1778,  Mason,  Rocheblave  Papers,  in  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s 
Collections,  iv.,  408. 

2  The  above  account  is  an  attempt  to  explain  in  the  light  of  the  knowledge  of  conditions 
just  previous  to  the  attack  the  following  passage  in  a  letter  from  Rocheblave  to  Carleton, 
dated  April  3  [evidently  miscopied  for  August  3],  1778.  The  translation  is  from  Mason, 
Rocheblave  Papers,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  418.  "Sir:  I  steal  a  moment  from  my 
guards  in  order  to  have  the  honor  of  informing  your  excellency  that  the  night  of  the  fifth  or 
[and?]  sixth  of  July  last  three  hundred  rebels  under  the  orders  of  Mr.  Clerke[5tc],  the  self-styled 
Colonel,  arrived  here  where  they  have  made  me  prisoner. 

'^The  majority  of  the  inhabitants  knowing  the  manoeuvres  which  had  occurred  in  the 
lower  part  of  the  Mississippi  were  resolved  to  defend  themselves,  but  the  dealings  of  our 
neighbors,  the  Spaniards,  and  the  abuse  of  the  treacherous  English,  especially  those  named 
Daniel  Murray,  Richard  Winston,  and  John  Hanson,  prevented  them  from  doing  it.  There 
remained  to  me  for  a  resource  Mr.  Legras,  who  prepared  himself  with  forty  men  to  come  and 
join  me  from  Fort  Vincennes,  where  he  is  a  captain  of  militia,  but  the  rebels  having  landed 
on  the  beautiful  river  [Ohio],  sixty  leagues  from  here,  crossed  the  neck  of  land  which  separates 
that  river  from  this  place,  and  prevented  that.  I  regret  so  much  the  more  that  he  did  not 
arrive,  as  a  number  of  men  on  seeing  me  supported  would  have  joined  themselves  to  us,  £ind 
we  would  have  been  able  to  hold  the  balance  of  affairs  in  opposition  to  those  who  were  desti- 


xlii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Whether  Clark  and  the  American  traders  of  Kaskaskia  com- 
municated with  each  other  before  the  attack  in  the  night  of  July 
4th  and  5th,  is  very  doubtful.  We  have  seen  that,  before  setting 
out  from  Fort  Pitt,  Clark  knew  of  no  party  in  the  village  that  was 
ready  to  give  him  assistance;  but  he  may  have  heard  of  the 
American  partisans  from  that  party  of  hunters,  just  from  Kas- 
kaskia, who  met  him  at  the  Tennessee  River,  although  from  his 
own  account  their  information  was  anything  but  reassuring; 
or  Murray  and  his  associates  may  have  communicated  with  him 
as  soon  as  he  approached  the  village.  There  is  some  shght  evi- 
dence that  the  capture  of  the  village  was  made  less  difficult  by 
the  aid  of  some  of  the  inhabitants ;  for  Clark  seems  to  have  found 
no  trouble  in  procuring  boats  to  convey  his  troops  across  the  Kas- 
kaskia River  ;^  and,  if  the  tradition  is  trustworthy,  his  soldiers 
were  admitted  to  the  fort  and  guided  to  the  bedchamber 
of  Rocheblave  by  a  Pennsylvanian,  who  may  have  been 
Daniel    Murray.^      Clark   himself   says    that    provisions    were 

tute  and  in  extremities."  In  1780  Rocheblave  gave  a  similar  explanation  of  liis  failure  to 
defend  the  Illinois,  Can.  Archives,  B.,  122,  p.  545. 

Since  Clark  himself  says  "that  they  had  some  suspicion  of  being  attacked  and  had  made 
some  preparations  —  keeping  out  spies  —  but  they,  making  no  discoveries,  had  got  off  their 
guard"  (Letter  to  Mason,  EngHsh,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  i.,  416)  and,  "we  were  informed 
that  the  people,  a  few  days  before,  were  under  arms,  but  had  concluded  that  the  cause  of  the 
alarm  was  without  foundation,  and  that  at  that  time  there  was  a  great  number  of  men  in 
town,  but  that  the  Indians  had  generally  left  it,  and  at  present-  all  was  quiet"  (Ibid  p.  476), 
there  appears  to  be  no  good  reason  for  rejecting  the  testimony  of  Rocheblave.  It  is  to  be 
noticed  also  that  the  Cahokians  write  as  if  the  Kaskaskians  chose  not  to  defend  their  village. 
See/>05<,  p.  537.  The  chief  difficulty  in  reconciUng  Rocheblave's  account  with  other  known 
facts  lies  in  his  own  letter  of  July  4th,  which  gives  a  long  narrative  of  the  depredations  of 
the  WilUng  expedition  on  the  southern  Mississippi  and  only  makes  a  brief  mention  of  the 
expected  attack  on  Kaskaskia  i.  e.,  "We  are  upon  the  eve  of  having  here  a  numerous  band  of 
brigands." 

Historians  have  followed  too  exclusively  and  uncritically  the  narratives  of  Clark,  who 
was  fond  of  the  dramatic,  not  to  say  the  melodramatic,  and  who  never  hesitated  to  omit  de- 
tails which  would  affect  what  he  regarded  as  the  dramatic  denouement.  Like  other  frontiers- 
men he  never  underestimated  his  own  deeds,  and  after  a  careful  comparison  of  the  letter  to 
Mason  with  the  Memoir,  one  is  forced  to  believe  that  he  was  given  to  exaggeration.  There- 
fore it  is  not  surprising  that  he  did  not  make  more  of  the  persons  and  conditions  which 
made  the  occupation  of  Kaskaskia  easy  and  that  he  emphasized  the  surprise  of  the  place, 
since  that  appealed  to  his  dramatic  instincts.  Mason  in  his  paper  on  Philippe  Rocheblave 
(Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  373)  uses  the  letter  quoted  above,  but  does  not  attempt  to  give 
any  explanation  of  it.  I  have  not  noticed  an  attempt  to  explain  this  letter  by  any  other 
historian  of  this  event.  See  Winsor,  Nar.  and  Crit.  Hist.,  vi.,  719;  English,  Conquest  of 
the  Northwest,  i.,  168;   Roosevelt,  Winning  of  the  West,  Pt.  ii.,  ch.  iv. 

1  He  says,  ' '  We  marched  after  night  to  a  farm  that  was  on  the  same  side  of  the  river, 
about  a  mile  above  the  town,  took  the  family  prisoners,  and  found  plenty  of  boats  to  cross  in, 
and  in  two  hours  transported  ourselves  to  the  other  shore  with  the  greatest  silence."  (Let- 
ter to  Mauon,  English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  i.,  416.)  If  he  really  found  these  boats 
on  the  east  bank  of  the  Kaskaskia,  how  did  they  happen  to  be  there,  since  very  few  people 
were  living  on  that  bank  at  the  time? 

2 Reynolds,  Pioneer  History,  73.  The  passage  is:  "An  American,  a  native  of  Penn- 
sylvania, was  there  in  the  Fort  and  conducted  Kenton  and  his  small  party  into  the  Fort  by  a 


INTRODUCTION  xliii 

collected  for  his  troops  by  Murray  and  Winston  during  the 
night.* 

It  is  evident  from  the  narratives  of  Clark  and  Bowman  and  from 
the  letters  of  Rocheblave  that  the  inhabitants  and  the  comman- 
dant himself  had  not  expected  the  attack  so  soon.  On  the  day 
before  the  attack  Rocheblave  wrote  to  Carleton :  "  We  are  upon 
the  eve  of  seeing  here  a  numerous  band  of  brigands,"^  but  the 
whole  tone  of  the  letter  proves  that  by  the  "eve"  he  did  not  mean 
that  very  night.  In  the  letter  sent  after  the  capture  of  the  village, 
he  writes  as  if  he  had  expected  that  there  was  plenty  of  time  to 
send  to  Vincennes  for  aid,  after  he  had  learned  of  Clark's  move- 
ments; and  as  if  he  had  been  disappointed  in  his  hope  of  assis- 
tance, because  the  Virginians  had  made  a  forced  march  by  land. 
This  looks  as  if  he  had  expected  the  party  to  take  the  customary 
route  down  the  Ohio  and  up  the  Mississippi.  If  Clark  had  fol- 
lowed this  course,  the  time  would  have  been  ample  for  Rocheblave 
to  obtain  reinforcements  from  Vincennes.^ 

What  the  feelings  of  the  majority  of  the  French  people  were 
when  they  heard  the  warwhoop  of  the  frontiersmen  in  their 
village  streets,  can  be  easily  imagined.  Since  the  time  of  the 
attack  was  a  surprise  and  the  less  intelligent  French  had  been 
taught  to  beHeve  the  worst  of  the  "Big  Knives,"  the  first  fear 
of  the  majority  has  probably  been  correctly  depicted  by  Clark. 
Many  of  the  more  inteUigent,  who  had  supported  Rocheblave, 
must  have  felt  terror  at  hearing  the  noise  and  have  had  misgivings 
of  the  future,  which  would  place  in  power  Murray,  Winston,  and 
Kennedy,  whom  they  had  learned  to  regard  as  their  enemies. 
Others,  like  Father  Gibault,  who  were  acquainted  with  the  hos- 
tility of  the  Protestant  East  to  the  Roman  CathoHc  Church, 
feared  perhaps  that  the  freedom  of  worship  might  be  denied  them. 
After  all  allowance  has  been  made  for  such  causes  as  these  and 

small  back  gate The  Pennsylvanian  was  true  to  liberty  and  conducted  them  to  the  very 

bedchamber  of  the  sleeping  Governor,  Rocheblave." 

*  In  his  Memoir,  English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  i.,  478. 

2  Rocheblave  to  Carleton,  July  4,  1778,  Mason,  Rocheblave  Papers,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s 
Collections,  iv.,  416. 

'  See  letter  quoted  on  p.  xli.,  note  2. 


xliv  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

the  suddenness  of  the  attack,  Clark's  narrative  of  the  abject 
terror  of  the  French  people  still  appears  somewhat  exaggerated. 
They  were  without  doubt  timid,  but  they  were  not  poltroons. 
Besides,  they  saw  several  familiar  faces  among  the  Virginians, 
some  of  whom  had  been  in  Kaskaskia,  and  others  they  had  met  on 
trading  trips. 

The  party  strife  of  the  village  broke  out  in  Clark's  headquar- 
ters on  the  very  night  of  the  attack.  The  closest  adherent  of 
Rocheblave's  faction,  Gabriel  Cerre,  was  absent  from  the  village, 
and  his  enemies  tried  to  win  the  favor  of  Clark  by  making  accusa- 
tions against  him;  but  Clark  was  not  deceived.  He  recognized 
that  his  position  was  critical.  He  was  in  an  alien  community  and 
had  only  a  small  body  of  troops  with  which  to  hold  the  people  in 
check.  Under  such  circumstances  he  could  not  afford  to  drive 
the  leader  of  such  a  strong  party  from  him.  How  important  he 
regarded  the  winning  of  the  support  of  Cerre  and  his  party  is 
proved  by  the  space  he  devotes  in  his  Memoir  to  an  account  of 
his  relations  with  this  leader.  ^  He  finally  confronted  Cerre  with 
his  accusers,  and  the  latter  were  afraid  to  repeat  their  charges. 
By  this  diplomatic  conduct  he  won  over  the  man  who  could  bind 
the  discordant  elements  in  the  villages  to  his  side. 

The  chief  means  used  by  Clark  to  gain  the  good  will  of  the 
French  at  this  critical  time  were  the  French  treaty  and  the  cry  of 
liberty.  We  have  already  seen  that  the  words  liberty  and  inde- 
pendence were  not  wholly  unknown  in  these  regions.  To  assert 
that  the  movement  which  was  growing  in  France  and  which  was 
in  eleven  years  to  break  out  in  the  French  Revolution  was  without 
effect  on  the  banks  of  the  Mississippi  would  be  taking  too  much 
for  granted.  The  best  of  these  men  were  educated  and  traveled 
to  New  Orleans  and  Quebec,  and  what  was  talked  of  there  was 
repeated  by  the  firesides  of  the  Illinois.  Only  ten  years  before 
their  friends  of  New  Orleans  were  in  revolt  against  Spanish 
tyranny,^  when  the  word  liberty  became  a  household  term;  and 
two  years  later  the  French  of  the  Illinois  were  making  use  of  the 

^  English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  i.,  pp   477,  478,  481,  484-486. 
2  Phelps,  Louisiana,  113 


INTRODUCTION  xlv 

same  word  in  their  struggle  with  Colonel  Wilkins.^  The  traders 
from  the  East  had  been  full  of  similar  ideas  during  the  past 
few  years.  Liberty  and  independence  were  words  with  which 
to  fire  the  imaginations  of  the  French  and  to  make  them  dream 
of  things  to  come. 

The  French  treaty  was  Clark's  trump  card  in  the  game  he  was 
playing ;  for  the  word  France  awakened  in  the  minds  of  the  Kas- 
kaskians  memories  of  days  gone  by,  always  more  joyous  than  the 
days  of ,  present  hardship, —  those  days  when  the  lilies  of  France 
waved  over  the  forts  of  the  lUinois.  France  is  a  name  of  wonder- 
ful meaning  to  Frenchmen  of  all  times.  The  people  of  Illinois 
felt  its  charm  and,  at  a  later  day,  said  "when  these  men  once 
pronounced  the  name  of  France,  how  could  they  raise  their  hands 
against  them?"^  Just  previously  rumors  had  been  spread  up 
and  down  the  Mississippi  that  France  was  coming  into  her  own 
again,  ridiculous  reports  no  doubt  spread  by  those  discontented 
with  the  British  rule,  and  yet  they  aroused  in  the  hearts  of  the 
French  a  hope,  of  which  the  appearance  of  Clark  seemed  a  har- 
binger. 

It  was  not  with  rifles  and  swords  that  Clark  won  the  Illinois, 
but  with  the  promise  of  liberty  and  the  alliance  with  France. 
These  two  weapons  were  all  sufficient.  Immediately  after  the 
occupation  of  Kaskaskia  Clark  sent  Bowman  with  a  detachment 
of  thirty  men  to  occupy  Cahokia,  which  yielded  readily  to  the 
same  persuasions.^  Vincennes  joined  the  American  cause  with- 
out even  the  use  of  troops,  for  Father  Gibault  undertook  to  per- 
suade the  people  to  submit,  which  they  did  after  their  priest  had 
represented  the  case  to  them."*  In  their  first  enthusiasm  the  French 
furnished  the  Virginians  with  all  their  necessities  and  their  need 
was  great,  for  they  had  reached  Kaskaskia,  as  the  inhabitants  of 
Vincennes  said,  "half  naked  Hke  the  Arabs. "^     But   the   spirit 

1  Mason,  Chapters  from  Illinois  History,  281  et  seq. 

2  See  post,  p.  537. 

3  Bowman's  letters  in  English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  i.,  558  et  seq.\  the  Cahokian 
account  in  this  vol.,  p.  537. 

*  Clark's  Letter  to  Mason,  English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  i.,  419. 

8 Inhabitants  of  Vincennes  to  De  la  Balme,  Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers. 


xlvi  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

in  which  the  French  received  the  Americans  is  best  seen  in  the 
way  they  aided  in  defending  the  country  against  the  British.  In 
December  following  the  occupation  of  the  Illinois  by  Clark, 
Lieutenant  Governor  Hamilton  of  Detroit  retook  Vincennes  and 
threatened  the  other  villages.  At  no  time  had  Clark's  position 
been  so  dangerous,  for  he  had  neither  money  nor  sufficient  troops. 
With  him  were  only  two  companies  of  soldiers,  in  which  some  of 
the  French  had  already  enlisted.  Since  these  were  too  few  either 
to  hold  his  position  or  to  make  an  attack,  he  called  upon  the 
villages;  and  two  companies  of  Frenchmen  were  formed.  The 
merchants  of  the  region  raised  the  necessary  money.  Clark  then 
made  his  difficult  and  dangerous  march  across  the  submerged 
prairies,  a  march  which  tried  to  the  utmost  the  endurance  of  the 
men.  The  conquest  of  Vincennes  and  the  retention  of  the  whole 
Northwest  for  the  Americans  were  the  results.  More  than  half 
of  the  men  who  followed  him  so  bravely  were  inhabitants  of  the 
American  Bottom.^  To  the  French  soldiers  in  Clark's  little  army 
as  well  as  to  the  Virginians  belongs  the  honor  of  that  campaign 
and  its  consequences. 

After  the  submission  of  the  villages  to  him,  Clark  found  him- 
self in  command  of  a  large  country  inhabited  by  a  people  who  had 
joined  themselves  willingly  to  his  cause  and  to  whom  he  had 
promised  greater  liberty  than  they  had  hitherto  enjoyed.  From 
the  first  he  was  called  upon  to  exercise  the  power  of  commandant 
and  judge.  He  continued  for  a  time  the  custom,  followed  by  the 
last  two  British  representatives,  of  appointing  arbitrators  in  all 
cases  of  dispute  between  the  inhabitants.^  This,  however,  was 
not  in  accordance  with  his  own  ideas  of  self-government,  which 
were  those  of  the  West  generally,  nor  did  his  many  military  duties 
permit  him  to  give  that  attention  to  civil  affairs  that  was  required. 
He  therefore  made  other   arrangements.      He   writes   that   he 

1  Va.  Stale  Papers,  i.,  316;  Letter  to  Mason,  English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  i.,  437. 
The  expedition  against  Vincennes  was  evidently  financed  by  the  inhabitants  of  the  French 
villages,  from  v/hom  Clark  raised  $11,102  between  December  20th  and  February  sth.  Clark's 
account  against  Virginia,  in  EngUsh,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  ii.,  1054. 

2  Kas.  Rec.  Court  Record,  fol.  100.  Letter  by  Clark,  July  24,  1778,  in  Amer.  Hist.  Rev. 
viii.,  SOI. 


INTRODUCTION  xlvii 

caused :  "  a  court  of  civil  judicature  to  be  established  at  Cahokia, 
elected  by  the  people.  Major  Bowman,  to  the  surprise  of  the 
people,  held  a  poll  for  a  magistracy,  and  was  elected  and  acted  as 
judge  of  the  court.  [The  policy  of  Mr.  Bowman  holding  a  poll  is 
easily  perceived.]  After  this  similar  courts  were  established  in 
the  towns  of  Kaskaskia  and  Vincent."^  The  title  of  the  court 
thus  founded  at  Cahokia  was  the  "Court  of  the  Committee  of 
Cahokia,"  and  a  few  pages  of  the  records  of  its  sessions  have  been 
preserved  and  are  printed  in  this  volume.^  Clark  reserved  the 
right  of  appeal  to  himself  and  he  adds :  "  I  believe  that  no  people 
ever  had  their  business  done  more  to  their  satisfaction  than  they 
had  through  the  means  of  these  regulations  for  a  considerable 
time."^  By  an  examination  of  the  few  remaining  records  it  is 
possible  to  arrive  at  an  approximate  date  for  the  founding  of  these 
courts.  The  date  of  the  earliest  paper  which  has  been  preserved 
issuing  from  the  court  at  Cahokia  is  October  29,  1778.'*  Among 
the  Kaskaskia  Records  is  a  court  record,  the  last  pages  of  which 
were  used  by  the  clerk  of  the  British  government  and  later  by  the 
clerk  of  the  Virginia  government  for  recording  deeds  and  other 
instruments.  The  first  entry  in  it  after  the  date  of  the  occupa- 
tion of  Kaskaskia  by  Clark  was  made  on  October  20th.  The 
last  direct  petition  to  Clark  that  exists  is  dated  August  27. "*  There- 
fore it  must  be  concluded  that  the  courts  were  established  be- 
tween the  last  of  August  and  the  last  of  October.  But  it  is  pos- 
sible to  make  a  closer  calculation.  Since  it  is  probable  that  an 
entry  was  made  by  the  Kaskaskia  clerk  in  his  book  of  record 
shortly  after  the  machinery  of  civil  government  was  started, 
we  may  take  the  date  October  20th  as  approximately  the  date  of 
the  establishment  of  the  court  at  Kaskaskia;  and  since  that  at 
Cahokia  was  the  earlier,  the  court  of  that  village  must  have  begun 

1  Clark's  Memoir,  English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  i.,  484.    The  sentence  in  brackets 
is  added  from  Dr.  MSS.  47J3S. 

2Pp.  2«/«g. 

3  Clark's  Memoir,  in  English,  Conquest  0}  the  Northwest,  i.,  484. 

*  See  post,  p.  2 . 

6  See  post,  p.  I  .  ; 


xlviii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

to  hear  suits  about  the  middle  of  the  same  month  and  possibly  a 
little  earlier.^ 

These  courts  were  modeled  after  the  county  courts  of  Virginia, 
with  some  modifications.  The  number  of  justices  sitting  at  Caho- 
kia  was  seven,  four  of  whom  were  necessary  for  a  quorum;  the 
sessions  were  held  weekly ;  the  jurisdiction  included  both  criminal 
and  civil  cases;  the  records  of  the  sessions  were  kept  in  Enghsh.^ 
Since  the  members  of  this  committee  were  elected  by  popular  vote, 
the  first  election  of  chief  magistrates  ever  held  on  the  soil  of  lUinois 
or  of  the  old  Northwest  was  that  at  Cahokia  in  the  month  of 
October,  in  the  year  1778. 

During  the  last  few  years  disorder  and  crime  had  increased  in 
the  Illinois.  We  have  seen  how  Rocheblave  lacked  the  power  to 
enforce  good  order  and  had  appealed  to  public  opinion  without 
effect  to  put  an  end  to  the  trading  in  Hquor  with  the  Indians. 
But  it  was  not  from  the  depredations  of  the  Indians  only  that 
the  people  suffered.  Members  of  the  slave  class,  influenced  by 
the  disorders  of  the  times,  had  become  insolent  and  violent,  so 
that  the  fear  of  the  large  population  of  red  and  black  slaves  was 
widespread,  and  with  good  reason,  for  many  murders  had  recently 
been  committed,  for  which  the  slaves  were  suspected  of  being 
responsible.  Members  of  the  family  of  the  NicoUe  had  become 
sick  and  died  under  the  most  suspicious  circumstances,  and 
several  sudden  deaths  of  both  whites  and  blacks  had  occurred 
which  gave  every  evidence  of  being  caused  by  poison.  To  stop 
further  lawlessness  by  this  class,  Clark  published  a  very  stringent 
order  against  the  slaves  on  December  24, 1778,  in  which  he  forbade 
them  to  walk  the  streets  after  sundown  without  a  special  permis- 
sion from  their  masters,  or  to  assemble  for  dances  at  night,  under 

1  It  is  possible  that  Clark  was  mistalcen  about  the  establishment  of  a  court  at  Kaskas- 
kia,  for  among  all  the  records  that  have  been  preserved  there  is  not  one  issuing  from  such 
a  court,  or  one  that  gives  direct  evidence  of  the  existence  of  such  a  court.  Moreover  there 
has  been  preserved  a  petition,  dated  February  i8,  1779,  from  a  widow  in  regard  to  her  hus- 
band's estate,  in  which  she  gives  elaborate  reasons  for  not  having  troubled  Colonel  Clark 
during  his  presence  in  Kaskaskia,  and  states  that  conditions  are  now  such  that  she  must 
have  protection  to  save  her  property.  Since  Clark  was  away,  she  applied  to  the  officers  of 
militia  of  Kaskaskia.  These  heard  her  prayer  and  granted  the  protection.  The  act  was 
signed  by  the  officers,  but  not  as  members  of  a  court.  One  name  has  been  torn  off,  but  the 
others  are  Joseph  Charleville,  Richard  Winston,  Charles  Danis,  and  Charles  de  Lisle  acting  for 
Duplasy.     Kas.  Rec,  Petitions. 

2  See  record  of  the  court,  pp.  4  et  seq. 


INTRODUCTION  xlix 

penalty  of  punishment  by  flogging.^  All  persons  were  forbidden 
to  sell  liquor  to  slaves.  In  the  court  of  Cahokia  an  investigation 
of  the  death  of  the  NicoUes  was  begun.  This  was  not  ended  until 
the  following  June,  when  it  was  proved  that  some  slaves,  of 
whom  two  were  particularly  guilty,  had  poisoned  a  number  of 
whites  as  well  as  several  negroes.^ 

Of  this  first  experiment  in  popular  government  in  the  Illinois 
very  little  can  be  said,  for  almost  all  its  records  have  been  de- 
stroyed. The  character  of  Clark,  the  order  he  preserved  or 
tried  to  preserve,  and  the  expedition  with  which  justice  was 
administered,  no  doubt  made  the  government  generally  popu- 
lar; still  the  military  power  was  very  evident  and  at  times 
arbitrary,  and  the  soldiers  were,  becoming  unruly.  Therefore  the 
French  looked  forward  to  the  time  when  a  civil  government,  not 
so  dependent  on  the  military  force,  should  be  inaugurated.  The 
people  were  reasonable,  however,  and  recognized  the  necessity 
of  these  temporary  arrangements,  and  in  their  first  enthusiasm 
exhibited  a  tractable  and  united  spirit  to  their  commandant.  In 
justice  to  Clark  it  must  be  said  that  neither  at  this  time  nor  later, 
when  there  was  most  just  cause  to  criticise  the  miUtary  force, 
did  the  French  utter  a  word  of  complaint  against  him,  for  he  had 
won,  not  only  their  esteem,  but  their  affection,  so  that  they  never 
held  him  responsible  for  the  evils  that  crowded  upon  them. 

One  cause  for  uneasiness  developed  very  soon  among  the  peo- 
ple. In  the  first  excitement  over  their  change  of  allegiance  and 
under  the  influence  of  that  enthusiasm  which  was  aroused  by  the 
talk  of  liberty  and  independence  by  Clark  and  his  soldiers,  they 
had  been  ready  to  make  many  sacrifices  for  the  cause  they  had 
espoused.  At  first  they  gave  freely  of  their  goods,  and  later  sold 
them  to  the  patriots,  who  had  brought  them  this  "priceless 
gift",  and  received  in  return  continental  paper  money,  which  they 
were  assured  by  Clark  and  his  officers  was  equal  in  value  to  the 
Spanish  piastre,  or  else  drafts  on  the  treasury  of  Virginia  or  the 
Virginia  agent  at  New  Orleans,  Oliver  Pollock.^    At  the  time 

1  Kas.  Rec,  Court  Record,  fol.  132. 

2  The  papers  in  the  case  are  printed  in  this  volume,  pp.  13  «/  seq. 

3  Every  petition  of  the  French  people  mentions  the  fact  that  they  were  deceived  by  the 


1  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

the  paper  money  was  worth  about  twelve  cents  on  the  dollar, 
and  the  French  were  to  learn  that  many  of  the  drafts  were  worth- 
less. The  suspicions  of  the  inhabitants  were  not  aroused  until 
early  in  1779,  while  Clark  was  absent  on  the  Vincennes  expedi- 
tion. Speculation  in  continental  money  was  very  common 
throughout  the  East  and  every  advantage  of  variation  in  its  value 
was  used  by  the  traders.  It  is  not  surprising,  therefore,  that  the 
story  of  Clark's  dealings  in  the  Illinois  were  soon  known  by  these 
men,  who,  tempted  by  the  opportunity  of  purchasing  goods 
with  continentals  at  their  face  value,  rushed  into  the  region. 
They  reached  the  French  villages  in  the  early  spring  of  1779, 
and  in  their  eagerness  to  make  the  utmost  use  of  the  opportunity, 
they  bid  against  each  other  with  the  result  that  the  confidence  of 
the  French  was  lost  and  the  value  of  the  paper  tumbled.  ^  In 
speaking  of  this  event,  Clark  says:  ''There  is  one  circumstance 
very  distressing,  that  of  our  own  moneys  being  discredited,  to  all 
intents  and  purposes,  by  the  great  number  of  traders  who  come 
here  in  my  absence,  each  outbidding  the  other,  giving  prices 
unknown  in  this  country  by  five  hundred  per  cent,  by  which  the  peo- 
ple conceived  it  to  be  of  no  value,  and  both  French  and  Spaniards 
refused  to  take  a  farthing  of  it.  Provision  is  three  times  the 
price  it  was  two  months  past,  and  to  be  got  by  no  other  means 
than  my  own  bonds,  goods,  and  force. "^  There  was  another  reason 
for  the  appreciation  of  the  price  of  supplies.     By  the  arrival  of 

Virginians  in  regard  to  the  value  of  the  paper  money.  See  Cahokian  Memorial  to  De  la 
Balme,  printed  in  this  vol.,  p.  547,  also  page  6;  from  the  memorial  of  the  people  of  Kaskaskia 
to  the  Virginia  commissioners,  March  i,  1783,  is  taken  the  following  passage:  "But  on  ac- 
count of  the  honest  appearance  of  General  Clark  and  of  his  officers  and  because  they  assured 
us  that  they  had  orders  to  draw  on  M.  Oliver  Pollock,  agent  of  the  state  of  Virginia  at  New 
Orleans,  there  was  no  difficulty  in  obtaining  all  they  needed  for  a  specie  in  current  paper, 
which  was  scattered  in  quantities  both  on  this  bank  and  the  Spanish  at  the  value  of  metalic 
piastres  of  Spain  and  all  our  supplies  have  been  sold  at  the  same  rate  and  conditions  ....  and 
since  we  could  not  believe  that  an  officer  in  accordance  with  his  orders  would  leave  us  ignorant 
of  the  fact  that  this  money  was  depreciated,  we  have  received  it  at  its  intrinsic  value."  (Menard 
Col.,  Tardiveau  Papers.)  In  a  memorial  to  the  governor  of  Virginia  the  same  people  said: 
"The  supphants  have  furnished  all  the  necessary  provisions  to  the  troops  at  a  sufficiently 
moderate  price  and  have  been  paid  with  a  paper  money  and  letters  of  exchange  which  we 
were  assured  were  equal  in  value  to  the  Spanish  piastre."  (Ibid,  memorial  dated  May  4, 
1781.)  The  people  of  Vincennes  in  a  petition  to  the  governor  of  Virginia,  June  30,  1781, 
wrote:  "The  accredited  officers  of  finance  and  others  have  assured  us  that  continental 
money  was  of  equal  value  with  coin,  and  we  accepted  the  same  in  good  faith."  (Va.  State 
Papers,  ii.,   192 j 

1  See  post,  p.  6. 

2  Clark  to  the  Governor  of  Virginia,  April  29,  1779,  in  Enghsh,  Conquest  of  the  North- 
west, i.,  400. 


INTRODUCTION  li 

the  Virginians  all  open  trade  with  Canada  had  been  stopped 
and,  since  that  country  was  one  of  the  chief  sources  from 
which  the  inhabitants  drew  their  goods  and  to  which  they 
sold  their  furs,  commerce  became  stagnant  and  commodities 
scarce.* 

The  credit  of  Clark's  government  was  supported  at  this  time 
by  the  merchants  and  traders  of  Illinois.  He  says:  "Several 
merchants  are  now  advancing  considerable  sums  of  their  own 
property,  rather  than  the  service  should  sujffer,  by  which  I  am 
sensible  they  must  lose  greatly,  unless  some  method  is  taken  to 
raise  the  credit  of  our  coin."^  The  merchants  who  gave  this 
timely  aid  to  the  American  cause  were  Daniel  Murray,  Winston, 
Janis,  the  Charlevilles,  the  Bauvais,  Duplasy,  and  Bienvenu,  of 
Kaskaskia;  Barbau  of  Prairie  du  Rocher;  Godin,  Trottier,  Girault, 
LaCroix,  Gratiot,  and  McCarty  of  Cahokia ;  LeGras,  Huberdeau 
and  Bosseron  of  Vincennes,  and  Vigo  with  possibly  others  of  St. 
Louis. ^  The  state  of  Virginia  had  undertaken  more  than  she 
could  perform,  since  her  treasury  was  exhausted  and  her  credit 
gone,  so  that  Clark  never  received  the  financial  support  that  he 
needed;  and  he  and  his  officers  were  in  time  forced  to  use  that 
expediency  which  made  the  Thirty  Years  War  in  Germany  so 
frightful,  namely  that  of  compelling  the  people  to  support  them. 
This  last  resort  had  not  become  necessary  in  the  spring  of  1779, 
at  least  it  was  not  officially  recognized ;  for  the  French  were  still 
ready  to  make  herculean  sacrifices  for  the  cause  which  they  had 
accepted  and  to  furnish  supplies  on  the  doubtful  credit  of  the 
state;  but  the  time  was  fast  approaching  when  they  would  de- 
mand a  settlement. 

^  Va.  State  Papers,  iii.,  501. 

2  See  supra,  xlvi.,  note  i. 

3  Clark's  account  against  Virginia,  in  English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  ii.,  1040  et  seq. 
The  list  of  names  is  not  complete  since  I  have  been  unable  to  identify  several  as  spelled  by 
Clark  and  because  drafts  were  drawn  by  other  officers  besides  Clark  and  these  would  not 
appear  in  his  account.  In  fact,  the  list  of  those  who  at  this  time  or  later  furnished  supplies 
on  credit  is  a  very  long  one,  including  almost  every  man  of  property  in  the  Illinois.  Gratiot 
of  Cahokia,  Cerr6  ot  Kaskaskia,  and  Vigo  of  St.  Louis  have  always  received  due  credit  for  the 
assistance  they  furnished,  but  they  were  no  more  active  than  the  other  members  of  the  French 
villages.  In  the  end  these  three  never  suffered  from  their  efforts  at  this  period  as  severely 
as  did  many  others.  Richard  Winston,  who  at  the  time  of  the  coming  of  Clark  was  regarded 
as  wealthy,  died  in  poverty;  and  the  Bauvais  family  was  reduced  to  almost  the  same  extrem- 
ity.   These  are  only  two  instances  among  many. 


lii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

While  Clark  had  been  regulating  the  affairs  of  the  Illinois, 
the  news  of  his  great  success  had  been  received  with  rejoicing  at 
Williamsburg,  and  the  government  of  Virginia  began  preparing 
for  some  more  permanent  form  of  civil  establishment  for  her  new 
citizens.  The  territory  north  of  the  Ohio  River  Hes  within  the 
region  which  Virginia  claimed  as  hers  under  her  charter  granting 
the  land  from  sea  to  sea.  According  to  the  Virginia  interpreta- 
tion of  that  charter,  the  state  was  fully  within  her  rights  in  legis- 
lating for  that  territory,  to  which  her  troops  had  just  given  her 
another  title. 

On  the  19th  of  November,  1778,  a  committee  was  appointed  by 
the  legislature  to  draft  the  requisite  bill,  which  was  introduced 
on  the  30th  and  passed  both  houses  on  December  9th,  ^ 

The  civil  estabHshment  thus  created  for  the  region  was  the 
same  in  its  essential  character  as  that  which  Virginia  had  used 
in  her  expansion  westward,  the  county  government.  Kentucky 
had  but  a  few  years  before  received  a  similar  organization.  This 
new  territory,  which  included  all  that  Clark  actually  held,  stretched 
from  the  Ohio  to  the  IlHnois  River  and  up  the  Wabash  towards 
Detroit  to  an  indefinite  boundary.  Ouiatanon  was  certainly 
under  the  jurisdiction  of  Virginia,  but  beyond  that  post  and  the 
Illinois  River  there  is  no  proof  of  her  exercising  jurisdiction. 
The  land  lying  between  this  northern  boundary  and  the  lakes 
was  disputed  territory  and  was  traversed  by  Virginia  and  British 
troops  at  various  times. 

The  government  of  the  "county  of  Illinois",  as  it  was  called, 
was  temporary  in  character  and  was  given  force  at  the  time  of  its 
enactment  for  only  one  year  and  then  to  the  end  of  the  next  ses- 
sion of  the  legislature.  On  account  of  the  difference  in  the  popu- 
lation Virginia  law  was  not  fully  extended  to  the  new  county.^ 
"  On  account  of  the  remoteness  of  the  region,"  so  runs  the  pream- 
ble of  the  act,  "  it  may  be  difficult,  if  not  impracticable,  to  govern 
it  by  the  present  laws  of  the  commonwealth,  until  proper  infor- 

1  The  act  is  reprinted  in  this  volume,  p.  9.  The  history  of  the  act  is  given  in  note  i  of 
the  same  page. 

2  For  a  discussion  of  how  far  the  laws  of  Virginia  were  extended  to  the  Illinois,  see  post, 
p.  Ixii. 


INTRODUCTION  liii 

mation,  by  intercourse  with  their  fellow  citizens,  on  the  east 
side  of  the  Ohio,  shall  have  familiarized  them  to  the  same,  and 
it  is  therefore  expedient  that  some  form  of  government  adapted 
to  their  circumstances  should  in  the  meantime  be  established." 
The  chief  executive  officer  and  commander  of  the  militia  was 
the  county  lieutenant,  or  commandant.  He  was  empowered  to 
appoint  as  many  deputy  commandants,  militia  officers,  and  com- 
missaries as  he  found  necessar>\  The  civil  officers  were  to  be 
the  same  as  the  inhabitants  were  accustomed  to,  and  they  were 
to  administer  the  law  which  was  in  force  in  the  region  already, 
that  is,  the  coutume  de  Paris.  Officers,  created  by  the  lieutenant, 
to  which  the  inhabitants  were  unaccustomed  were  to  be  supported 
by  the  Virginia  treasury,  the  others  by  the  people.  Both  mili- 
tary and  civil  officers  were  required  to  take  the  oath  of  office 
according  to  the  rehgion  to  which  they  were  accustomed.  The 
people  were  given  assurance  of  the  free  exercise  of  their  religion. 
The  power  of  the  court  to  be  established  and  of  the  county  heu- 
tenant  was  limited  in  actions  for  treason  and  murder  to  the  same 
extent  as  it  was  in  all  counties  of  Virginia.^  In  such  cases  the 
lieutenant  was  permitted  to  stay  execution  until  the  opinion  of 
the  governor  or  the  assembly  had  been  obtained. 

On  December  12,  1778,  and  in  accordance  with  this  act,  Patrick 
Henry  commissioned  John  Todd  county  lieutenant.  For  such 
a  difficult  and  important  position  Todd  seemed  as  good  a  candi- 
date as  was  available.  His  ancestry  was  Scotch-Irish,  one  of 
his  ancestors  having  fled  from  Scotland  to  escape  the  persecutions 
of  Claverhouse.  His  grandfather  had  come  to  America  in  the 
year  1737,  when  Todd's  father  was  still  in  his  youth,  and  had 
settled  in  Montgomery  County,  Pennsylvania.  From  his  mother 
Todd  inherited  Welsh  blood.  His  education  had  been  exception- 
ally good.  His  uncle,  also  named  John  Todd,  was  a  well-educated 
man,  having  graduated  from  Princeton  in  1749,  and  was  a  minis- 
ter in  Louisa  County,  Virginia,  where  he  kept  a  classical  school. 
It  was  at  his  uncle's  school  that  the  future  county  lieutenant  was 
educated.     Afterwards  he  studied  law  and  practiced  a  short  time. 

^  Chitwood,  Justice  in  Colonial  Virginia,  82, 


liv  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

But  the  attraction  of  the  frontier  life  was  in  his  blood,  as  it  was  in 
that  of  so  many  other  young  men  of  his  time,  and  at  the  outbreak 
of  the  Dunmore's  War  he  became  aid  to  General  Lewis.  In 
the  following  year  he  made  his  way  among  the  first  settlers  to 
Kentucky  and  was  present  at  the  meeting  which  was  held  to 
establish  the  government  of  the  proprietary  colony  of  Transyl- 
vania. In  1777  he  was  elected  burgess  from  the  county  of  Ken- 
tucky to  the  general  assembly  of  Virginia.  The  duties  of  this 
office  prevented  him  from  taking  part  in  Clark's  expedition  to  the 
lUinois.^  In  appearance  Todd  was  far  from  imposing.  He 
was  only  five  feet  six  inches  in  height,  but  was  reputed  the  swiftest 
footman  of  his  day  and  excelled  in  all  forms  of  gymnastics.  Like 
Clark  and  most  of  the  leaders  of  the  western  movement  he  was 
still  a  young  man,  being  at  the  time  of  his  appointment  twenty- 
eight  years  old.  His  experience,  however,  had  been  on  the 
frontier;  he  was  accustomed  to  the  American  type  of  pioneer, 
and  was  personally  brave  and  a  good  Indian  fighter.  He  united 
with  these  qualities  a  knowledge  of  law  and  a  culture  superior 
to  that  of  any  other  man  in  the  West.  His  education  and  his 
character  seemed  to  fit  him  for  the  task  before  him.  But  the 
events  in  the  Illinois  were  already  approaching  a  crisis,  brought 
on  by  the  clash  of  Anglo-Saxon  and  Gallic  temperament;  the 
unity  of  feeling  and  the  glow  of  enthusiasm  aroused  by  the  shouts 
of  liberty  and  the  huzzas  for  the  French  alliance  were  already 
changing,  and  the  French  were  beginning  to  count  the  cost  of  the 
transference  of  their  allegiance ;  criticism,  denunciation,  and  open 
opposition  were  ready  to  break  forth.  Under  such  conditions 
was  the  experience  of  twenty-eight  years  sufficient  to  enable 
Todd  to  master  the  situation?^ 

The  instructions  given  him  by  Governor  Henry  were  wise  and 
suited  to  the  occasion :  "  Altho  Great  reliance  is  placed  on  your 
prudence  in  managing  the  people  you  are  to  reside  among,  yet 
consider'g  you  as  unacquainted  in  some  Degree  with  their  Genius, 

1  The  Todd  on  the  expedition  was  his  brother,  Levi.  English,  Conquest  of  the  North- 
west, ii.,  9SI. 

2  For  the  Ufe  of  Todd  see.  Green,  Historic  Families  of  Kentucky;  Morehead,  Settlement 
of  Kentucky,  174;    Mason,  Chapters  from  Illinois  History,  252. 


INTRODUCTION  Iv 

usage,  and  maners,  as  well  as  the  Geography  of  the  Cuntry  I 
recommend  it  to  you  to  consult  and  advise  with  the  most  intelligi- 
ble and  upright  persons  who  may  fall  in  your  way  ....  and  I  know 
of  no  better  Gen^  Direction  to  Give  than  this,  that  you  Consider 
yourself  at  the  head  of  the  Civill  department,  and  as  Such  having 
the  Comm^  of  the  militia,  who  are  not  to  be  under  the  comm^ 
of  the  militar}^  untill  ordered  out  by  the  civil  Authority,  and  to  act 
in  conjunction  with  them 

"You  are  on  all  Accatons  to  inculcate  on  the  people  the  value 
of  liberty  and  the  Difference  between  the  State  of  free  Citizens 
of  the  Commonwelth  and  that  Slavery  to  which  Ilinois  was  Des- 
tined. A  free  &  equal  representation  may  be  expected  by  them 
in  a  little  Time,  together  with  all  the  improvm*^  in  Jurisprudence 
and  police  which  the  other  parts  of  the  State  enjoy 

"The  Ditaile  of  your  Duty  in  the  civil  Department  I  need 
not  give  you,  its  best  Direction  will  be  found  in  y^  innate  love  of 
Justice  and  Zeal  to  be  intend vely  usefull  to  your  fellow-men. 
A  general  Direction  to  act  according  to  the  best  of  y^  Judgment 
in  cases  where  these  Instructions  are  Silent  and  the  laws  have 
not  Otherwise  Directed  is  given  to  you  from  the  necessity  of  the 
case,  for  y^  Great  Distance  from  Governm*  will  not  permit  you  to 
wait  for  Orders  in  many  Cases  of  Great  Importance."^ 

Clark  received  Todd  with  joy,  for  they  were  good  friends; 
but  a  greater  reason  was  that  he  found  the  task  of  superintending 
the  civil  department  and  at  the  same  time  of  making  the  needed 
preparations  for  the  contemplated  attack  on  Detroit  in  the  sum- 
mer too  difficult.^  The  fussy  details  of  the  former  were  annoying 
to  a  mind  like  Clark's  which  was  only  aroused  to  its  best  by  the 
excitement  of  some  bold  military  undertaking. 

Todd  reached  the  Illinois  in  May,  1779.  One  of  his  first  duties 
was  to  organize  the  mihtia.  There  was  Httle  to  be  done,  for 
Clark  had  maintained  the  military  organization  which  he  found 
in  existence  and  had  confirmed  the  appointments  of  the  officers 
already  in  command.     Todd  now  reconfirmed  them  under  the 

1  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  289  et  seq.;  Va. 
State  Papers,  i.,  312. 

2  Clark's  Memoir,  English,  Conquest  0}  the  Northwest,  i.,  449. 


Ivi  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

authority  conferred  on  him  by  the  act  of  the  Virginia  legislature. 
As  far  as  the  records  show  neither  Clark  nor  Todd  made  many 
changes  in  the  personnel  of  the  militia.  Under  the  British  rule 
the  officers  had  been  selected  from  the  most  prominent  men  of  the 
community,  and  the  new  government  could  not  afford  to  alienate 
them.  A  few  changes  were  made  by  one  of  the  Virginians  in 
Kaskaskia,  where  Richard  Winston,  an  American  trader,  was 
made  commandant,  Nicolas  Janis  and  Joseph  Duplasy  were 
retained,  and  Brazeau  was  not  given  a  commission.^  There 
could  be  no  thought  of  change  at  Prairie  du  Rocher,  where  J. 
Bte.  Barbau  had  been  chief  citizen  for  years. ^  At  St.  Philippe 
a  commandant  was  also  appointed,  probably  Pierre  the  Sieur 
de  Girardot,  who  held  somewhat  the  same  position  in  that  com- 
munity as  Barbau  at  Prairie  du  Rocher.^  At  Cahokia  Joseph 
Cesirre,  who  had  been  judge  and  captain  of  militia  for  several 
years,  was  not  commissioned,  but  this  was  probably  due  to  his 
death,  which  occurred  in  this  year,  possibly  before  Todd's  arrival. 
Francois  Trottier  was  made  commandant  of  the  village  and  Mi- 
chel Beaulieu  and  Pierre  Godin  called  Turanjeau,  were  com- 
missioned captains.*  The  latter  was  a  new  name  in  such  a  promi- 
nent position,  but  the  Godin  family  was  an  important  one  and 
without  doubt  the  appointment  was  approved  by  the  people. 
In  Peoria  J.  Bte.  Mailhet  was  appointed  commandant.^ 

Before  issuing  the  commissions  to  the  militia  ofi&cers,  Todd 
had  given  his  attention  to  the  establishment  of  the  civil  govern- 

^  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Colleclions,  iv.,  294;  Kas.  Rec, 
various  papers. 

2  Barbau  was  from  New  Orleans  and  was  about  fifty-seven  years  old  at  this  time.  He 
was  one  of  the  judges  of  the  court  of  judicature  established  by  Colonel  Wilkins  in  1768  and 
from  that  date  is  conspicuous  in  all  the  affairs  of  the  American  Bottom.  It  will  be  seen  that 
he  was  called  to  an  important  position  later  at  a  critical  time.  See  Post,  p.  .  After  the 
United  States  came  into  control  of  the  country,  he  still  continued  to  be  a  representative  citizen 
and_  was  appointed  to  many  public  positions.  He  died  in  1810.  Kas.  Rec;  Smith,  St. 
Clair  Papers,  ii.,  165.     His  will  is  recorded  in  the  probate  record  of  Randolph  Co. 

3  Girardot  was  a  former  French  infantry  ofi&cer,  who  for  some  reason  chose  to  remain  in 
the  Illinois.  He  was  appointed  one  of  the  justices  by  Colonel  Wilkins.  I  have  not  been  able 
to  find  the  rest  of  his  name,  for  he  was  always  called  by  his  title. 

*  For  these  Cahokians  see  the  notes  to  the  census  of  the  village  on  page  624  et  seq . 

5  The  appointment  of  a  commandant  at  Peoria  and  St.  Philippe  is  not  mentioned  by 
Todd  in  liis  Record-Book,  but  since  we  learn  that  such  officers  were  acting  later  at  these 
places,  they  must  have  been  appointed  about  this  time.  For  an  account  of  Mailhet  see  p.  231, 
note  2.  In  1790  it  was  believed  that  Mailhet  was  appointed  commandant  by  Clark.  Smith, 
St.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,  138. 


INTRODUCTION  Ivii 

ment.  He  had  received  very  definite  instructions  on  this  head 
in  the  act  creating  the  county,  according  to  which  the  magistrates 
were  to  be  such  as  the  people  were  accustomed  to  and  were  to  be 
elected  by  popular  vote.  The  problem,  however,  was  not  an 
easy  one.  Under  the  French  regime  the  civil  magistrate  was  a 
judge  with  sole  authority  in  all  judicial  and  executive  matters 
not  belonging  to  the  military  department.^  During  the  British 
period  there  had  been  a  feeble  attempt,  in  1768,  to  create  a  court 
of  judicature,  but  it  had  failed;^  and  since  that  time  the  military 
commandant  had  been  also  judge,  assisted  by  justices  in  each 
village,  whose  duties  seem  to  have  been  to  put  in  execution  the 
decrees  of  the  commandant.  Neither  of  these  arrangements 
was  in  accord  with  the  democratic  ideas  of  the  frontier.  There 
was,  however,  another  model.  Since  the  fall  of  the  previous 
year,  the  Illinois  villages  had  been  governed  by  the  courts  estab- 
lished by  Clark.  The  justices  were  elected  by  popular  vote  and 
had  given  general  satisfaction.  Todd  determined  to  continue 
these  as  fulfilling  the  requirements  of  the  law.  Since  Illinois  was 
so  large,  it  was  impossible  to  hold  a  court  at  any  one  of  the  villages 
for  the  whole  county.  Three  districts  were,  therefore,  created: 
the  Kaskaskia  district  included  Prairie  du  Rocher,  Chartres 
village,  and  St.  Philippe  besides  Kaskaskia  itself ;  the  Cahokia 
district  extended  from  the  village  of  Prairie  du  Pont  to  Peoria  on 
the  Illinois  River;  and  the  Vincennes  district  included  all  the 
region  of  the  Wabash.^  The  court  consisted  of  six  justices  from 
the  principal  village  and  representatives  from  the  other  com- 
munities of  the  district.  Thus  two  justices  were  elected  for 
Prairie  du  Rocher  and  one  for  St.  Philippe  in  the  Kaskaskia 
district ;  one  was  added  to  the  Cahokia  court  for  the  Httle  vil- 
lageof  Prairie  du  Pont;  and  three  were  elected  for  the  com- 
munities in  the  Wabash  region  outside  of  Vincennes.*      These 

1  Alvord,  Illinois  in  the  Eighteenth  Century,  i6. 

2  Ibid,  2 1 . 

3  Todd's  speech,  quoted  on  page  Ix.  gives  the  boundaries  of  the  Kaskaskia  district.  The 
boundaries  of  the  Cahokia  district  are  obtained  by  the  examination  of  the  extent  of  its  juris- 
diction. 

*  Todd  says  in  his  speech  that  six  justices  are  to  be  elected  at  Kaskaskia  and  two  others 
from    Prairie    du  Rocher    and    St.  Philippe.      As   a  matter    of    fact    two    were    elected 


Iviii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

justices  were  elected  for  a  year  and  might  become  candidates  for 
re-election.^ 

The  election  for  the  new  government  was  held  at  Kaskaskia, 
on  May  12th,  with  suitable  ceremonies.  The  people  were  sum- 
moned to  a  general  assembly  at  the  church  door,  where  they  had 
been  accustomed  to  meet  to  transact  their  business  for  years. 
They  came  in  their  picturesque  hohday  apparel,  for  to  them 
this  seemed  the  day  of  the  fulfilment  of  all  their  anticipations. 
Near  by  were  drawn  up  the  Virginia  soldiers  of  the  lUinois  bat- 
talion, and  possibly  groups  of  Kaskaskia  Indians  were  on  the 
outskirts  of  the  crowd.  The  central  group  was  composed  of 
Clark  with  his  officers  and  Todd  with  his  attendants,  and  with 
these  stood  without  doubt  Father  Gibault.^ 

The  presiding  officer^of  this  remarkable  assembly  was  George 
Rogers  Clark.  He  had  prepared  an  address  for  the  occasion,  but 
since  his  knowledge  of  French  was  limited,  it  was  written  and 
read  by  his  official  interpreter,  Jean  Girault.  His  address  was 
in  part  as  follows:  "From  your  first  declaration  of  attachment 
to  the  American  cause  up  to  the  time  of  the  glorious  capture  of 
post  St.  Vincent,  I  had  doubted  your  sincerity ;  but  in  that  critical 
moment  I  proved  your  fidelity.  I  was  so  touched  by  the  zeal 
which  you  have  shown  that  my  desire  is  at  present  to  render  you 
happy  and  to  prove  to  you  the  sincere  affection  that  I  have  for  the 
welfare  and  advancement  of  this  colony  in  general  and  of  each 
individual  in  particular.  The  young  men  of  this  colony  have 
returned  from  Post  St.  Vincent  covered  with  laurels  which  I  hope 

from  Prairie  du  Rocher,  as  the  election  certificate  shows.  {Kas.  Rec.)  The  ninth  member 
of  the  court  was  the  Sieur  de  Girandot,  wJio  was  a  resident  of  St.  Philippe.  {Amer.  State  Pap., 
Pub.  Lands,  ii.,  192.)  The  number  six  remains  throughout  the  period  as  the  number  of 
justices  to  be  elected  at  Kaskaskia.  See  pp.  cxvi.,  cxxxiv.  At  Cahokia  there  was  always  a 
member  of  the  court  who  was  a  resident  of  Prairie  du  Pont  and  the  court  of  Vincennes  must 
have  also  followed  the  Kaskaskia  model. 

1  In  Cahokia  the  election  was  annual  and  on  account  of  the  completeness  of  the  records 
it  is  best  to  base  conclusions  about  practice  on  that  of  the  court  of  that  village;  but  in  the 
certificate  of  the  second  election  of  the  two  justices  of  Prairie  du  Rocher  in  1782,  it  is  stated 
that  the  time  of  service  of  the  justices  as  estabUshed  by  law  had  passed  and  so  two  more 
justices  were  elected.  This  would  make  the  tenure  of  ofl&ce  three  years.  {Kas.  Rec,  Pol. 
Papers.)  No  conclusions  can  be  drawn  from  the  elections  at  Kaskaskia,  since  they  were  held 
so  irregularly  and  the  same  is  true  of  what  little  is  known  of  the  court  at  Vincennes.  (See 
post,  p.  Ixxxiv.;    Dunn,  Indiana,  passim.) 

2  In  all  French  villages  the  regular  place  for  holding  assemblies  was  in  front  of  the  church . 
Babeau,  Les  assetnblees  generates,  21  ei  seq.  It  is  possible  that  the  troops  and  the  Indians 
were  not  present,  but  it  seems  probable  that  they  were. 


INTRODUCTION  lix 

they  will  continue  to  wear."  He  then  praised  those  who  had 
remained  at  home  to  defend  their  village,  and  expressed  a  hope 
that  they  would  soon  have  an  opportunity  to  win  similar  glory. 
He  told  them  that  they  would  soon  possess  the  liberty  which  the 
Americans  enjoyed,  and  that  America  would  protect  them.  The 
governmen;,  "has  appointed  for  you  a  civil  lieutenant  governor 
to  regulate  and  settle  your  affairs.  In  a  short  time  you  will  know 
the  American  system,  which  you  will,  perhaps,  think  strange  in 
principle,  but  in  the  end  you  will  find  in  it  so  much  peace  and 
tranquillity  that  you  will  bless  the  day  that  you  embraced  the 
cause  of  the  Americans.  You  should  be  persuaded  that  we 
desire  to  render'  you  happy  and  to  procure  for  you  all  possible 
succor. 

"I  present  to  you  Colonel  Todd,  my  good  friend,  as  your 
governor.  He  is  the  only  person  in  the  state  whom  I  desired  to 
fill  this  post  in  this  colony.  I  am  fully  persuaded  from  my  knowl- 
edge of  his  capacity  and  diligence  that  he  will  succeed  in  render- 
ing to  you  justice  and  making  you  contented. 

"You  are  assembled  here,  gentlemen,  for  an  affair  of,  the 
greatest  importance,  namely,  to  elect  the  most  capable  and  illus- 
trious persons  to  sit  in  judgment  on  your  differences I 

pray  you  to  consider  the  importance  of  this  choice  and  to  make 
it  without  partiality  and  to  elect  the  persons  most  worthy  of  your 
trust ;  and  I  hope  that  in  a  short  time  that  you  will  be  convinced 
that  you  are  the  freest  people  in  the  universe."^ 

Clark  was  followed  by  the  county  lieutenant,  John  Todd. 
His  speech  was  also  read  by  some  one  familiar  with  the  language. 
He  said  in  part :  "  Gentlemen,  I  am  sent  by  the  government  of 
Virginia  to  exercise  the  duties  of  chief  magistrate  of  this  county. 
The  reception  which  I  have  received  from  you  deserves  my 
thanks.  I  am  flattered  and  shall  always  be  happy,  if  my  power 
can  serve  your  well-being.  I  am  sure  that  nothing  will  be  lacking 
on  my  part  to  secure  that  end. 

"The  Republic  of  Virginia  has  had  only  noble  motives  in 

1  Dr.  MSS.y  49j43-  This  is  an  original  manuscript  and  is  signed  by  Clark,  Fort  Glark, 
May  12,  ^^^<).    Translation  by  the  editor. 


Ix  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

coming  here.  It  was  not  moved  by  the  love  of  conquest  but  has 
come  to  invite  you  to  participate  with  her  citizens  in  the  blessing 
of  a  free  and  equal  independence  and  to  be  governed  and  judged 
by  officers  who  shall  be  placed  in  power  by  the  people. 

"Your  great  distance  from  the  capital,  gentlemen,  does  not 
permit  you  to  send  representatives  to  the  assembly ;  but  if  in  the 
future  it  happens  that  for  your  welfare  or  to  avoid  loss  you  prefer 
such  representation,  I  have  it  in  my  instructions  to  assure  you 
that  it  will  not  be  refused  you. 

"  The  purpose  for  which  we  have  assembled  you  to-day,  gentle- 
men, is  that  you  may  choose  among  you  six  of  the  most  notnbie  and 
most  judicious  to  be  judges  of  the  court  of  Kaskaskia,  conjointly 
with  two  others  from  Prairie  du  Rocher  and  St.  Philippe. 

"Each  one  with  the  right  of  voting  can  give  his  vote,  either 
viva  voce  or  by  writing,  to  elect  whomever  he  wishes  to  place  in 
office."! 

The  assembly  then  proceeded  to  tho  election.  A  large  ballot 
sheet  had  been  prepared  which  was  divided  into  squares.  At 
the  top  of  this  were  placed  the  names  of  the  candidates,  and  at  the 
side  the  names  of  the  voters  as  they  handed  in  their  votes  either 
by  word  of  mouth  or  by  writing,  and  their  choice  was  checked  off 
in  the  proper  squares.^  The  harmony  of  parties  is  evident  from 
the  list  of  men  chosen  as  justices.  The  old  factional  strife,  which 
had  marked  the  years  of  Rocheblave's  government,  was  hushed 
before  the  grand  ideals  which  had  been  invoked  by  the  men  who 
had  inaugurated  this  new  constitution.  All  men  united  in  choos- 
ing those  who  appeared  most  fitted  to  exercise  the  duties  of  the 
new  office.  At  the  head  of  the  court  was  placed  the  man  who 
had  been  the  chief  support  of  Rocheblave,  but  who  had  in  the 
past  few  months  won  the  confidence  of  Clark  and  his  officers  by 
the  liberal  assistance  he  had  given  their  tottering  finances,  Gabriel 
Cerre.  On  the  whole,  however,  the  names  of  the  judges  are 
those  of  men  who  had  been  lukewarm  to  the  British  cause  and 
had  won  favor  either  in  the  recent  campaign  against  Vincennes 

1  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Cah.  Rec.    This  is  an  original  manuscript.     Translation  by  the  editor. 

2  At  least  this  was  the7method  at  later  elections.  Kas.  Rec,  Pol.  Papers,  among  which 
are  two  such  ballot  sheets. 


INTRODUCTION  Ixi 

or  by  their  cordial  acceptance  of  the  American  allegiance.  There 
were  elected  from  Kaskaskia,  besides  Cerre,  Joseph  Duplasy, 
Jacques  Lasource,  Nicolas  Janis,  Nicolas  Lachance,  and  Charles 
Charleville.^ 

On  May  19th  the  people  of  Prairie  du  Rocher  assembled  and 
elected  J.  Bte.  Barbau  and  Antoine  Duchaufour  de  Louvieres  as 
their  representives  in  the  court.  At  St.  Philippe,  Pierre  Sieur 
de  Girardot  was  elected.^ 

The  court  now  being  complete,  Todd  issued  the  commission 
on  May  the  twenty-first:  "From  the  great  Confidence  reposed 
in  your  Judgment  &  Integrity  by  the  good  people  of  Kaskaskia 
and  its  dependencies  and  agreeably  to  an  act  of  the  general  assem- 
bly of  Virginia,  you  are  hereby  constituted  &  appointed  Justices 
of  the  peace  for  the  District  of  Kaskaskia  and  Judges  of  the 
Court  of  the  said  District  in  cases  both  civil  &  criminal,  any 
four  or  more  of  you  are  authorized  to  constitute  a  Court  before 
whom  shall  be  cognizable  all  actions  and  cases  of  which  the 
Courts  of  the  Counties  of  this  commonwealth  Respectively  have 
Cognizance,  your  judgment  must  have  the  Concurence  of  at 
least  a  majority  and  be  entered  with  the  proceedings  previous  and 
subsequent  and  fairly  recorded  in  Books  provided  for  that  pur- 
pose."^ 

Richard  Winston,  who  was  already  commandant  of  the  vil- 
lage, was  appointed  by  Todd  to  the  office  of  sheriff  and  Jean 
Girault,  state's  attorney.  Carbonneaux,  who  had  been  clerk 
during  the  British  period,  was  re-elected  by  the  court.'' 

The  date  of  the  inauguration  of  the  court  at  Cahokia  is  not 
known.  During  the  subsequent  years  the  elections  were  held 
generally  after  the  middle  of  June,  the  nineteenth  being  the 
favorite  date;  but  the  court  was  elected  before  that  date  in  1779, 
for  it  was  in  session  as  early  as  the  tenth  of  June.  *    The  election 

1  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  295. 

2  For  election  at  St.  Philippe  see  supra,  p.  Ivii.,  note  4. 

*  Kas.  Rec,  Court  Record,  fol.  169. 

*  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  295.  Winston's 
commission  is  among  the  Kas.  Rec. 

»  See  post,  p.  13. 


Ixii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

passed  off  without  making  many  changes  in  the  personnel  of  the 
court  which  had  been  established  in  1778  by  Major  Bowman. 
In  the  place  of  Langlois,  Bte.  Saucier  was  returned.  J.  Bte. 
LaCroix  was  appointed  sheriff  by  Todd  and  Frangois  Saucier 
was  elected  clerk  by  the  court.  ^  A  court  was  also  established  at 
Vincennes.  As  this  post  lay  outside  the  territory  which  in  time 
has  become  the  state  of  Illinois  and  since  the  records  from  which 
this  account  is  drawn  belong  to  the  villages  of  the  Mississippi 
bottom,  the  history  of  Vincennes  will  be  noticed  only  incidentally 
in  this  Introduction. 

The  history  of  these  courts  was  very  dissimilar,  as  will  be  shown 
in  the  following  pages;  but  there  are  certain  general  statements 
in  regard  to  them  which  can  be  made  that  are  true  of  all.  The 
courts  met  at  first  rather  irregularly,  for  the  justices  seem  to 
have  attempted  to  continue  the  weekly  sessions  to  which  they  had 
become  accustomed  in  Clark's  courts.  Later  they  gave  this  up 
and  settled  down  to  holding  monthly  sessions  with  some  regularity 
and  meeting  in  special  sessions  when  required.^  The  individual 
justices  had  jurisdiction  in  cases  involving  not  more  than  twenty- 
five  shilHngs,  as  was  the  law  in  the  other  counties  of  Virginia.' 
The  French  law  was  retained  as  the  law  of  the  county,  but  it  was 
modified  somewhat  by  the  law  of  Virginia.  In  a  letter  to  Clark 
on  December  12,  1778,  Governor  Henry  mentions  sending  him  the 
Bill  of  Rights  of  Virginia  to  guide  the  French  people,  and  appeal 
was  made  to  it  at  one  time  at  least  in  the  history  of  the  court 
of  Kaskaskia.^  But  this  was  not  the  only  Virginia  act  that  was 
used  in  these  courts,  for  we  find  mention  of  the  "  Code  of  Laws 
and  Bill  of  Rights"  as  a  guide  to  be  followed  in  questions  of 
difficulty.^  What  this  code  contained  I  have  been  unable  to 
discover,  but  it  was  probably  the  more  important  laws  respecting 

^  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  295. 

2  This  was  true  both  of  the  Kaskaskia  and  the  Cahokia  courts.  Mason,  John  Todd's 
Record-Book,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  309. 

3  Chitwood,  Justice  in  Colonial  Va.,  81;   see  post  p.  533. 
*  Dr.  MSS.,  60J1,  a  copy;   Kas.  Rec,  Letters. 

^Memorial  of  Timothe  de  Monbreun,  November  18,  1794,  Va.  State  Library. 


INTRODUCTION  Ixiii 

the  county  courts.  There  was  some  attempt  at  Kaskaskia  to 
regulate  the  procedure  in  accordance  with  English  law.  On 
one  of  the  stray  papers  of  the  records  from  Kaskaskia  there  is 
a  regular  docket  like  that  of  any  English  court.  At  the  end 
of  the  Cahokia  court  record,  pubHshed  in  this  volume,  there  is 
an  attempt  to  imitate  the  same  form.  Trial  by  jury  was  also 
permitted  and  probably  required  in  criminal  cases;  at  least  the 
record  of  the  first  jury  trial  at  Cahokia  was  criminal.  Another 
evidence  of  the  influence  of  the  English  law  is  the  practice  of 
arresting  men  for  debt,  which  makes  a  late  appearance  in  the  his- 
tory of  the  Cahokia  court.  On  the  whole  the  law  of  the  courts  is 
that  of  the  coutume  de  Paris,  as  it  had  been  used  in  the  Illinois 
throughout  the  eighteenth  centuiy.  The  litigants  do  not  as  a 
rule  favor  the  English  procedure  and  are  generally  satisfied  to 
have  a  majority  of  the  judges  decide  their  cases  in  accordance 
with  equity. 

There  were  very  serious  charges  made  against  the  Vincennes 
justices  on  account  of  the  large  costs  they  demanded.  A  similar 
charge  could  not  be  made  against  the  Cahokia  court,  for,  with  the 
exception  of  a  few  cases,  which  might  be  explained  if  we  knew 
all  the  circumstances,  the  costs  were  moderate  and  not  different 
from  those  that  had  been  fixed  by  the  ordinances  of  the  French 
kings.  Of  the  Kaskaskia  court  almost  nothing  is  known,  on 
account  of  the  disappearance  of  the  record.  That  the  justices  of 
Cahokia  were  careful  in  preserving  the  records  of  their  sessions 
is  evident  from  this  volume.  The  history  of  the  courts  at  Kaskas- 
kia and  Vincennes  was  far  more  stormy,  and  no  doubt  in  the  fac- 
tional fights  the  records  were  not  kept  as  well,  but  that  they  were 
made  is  evident  from  numerous  references  to  them  in  letters  and 
petitions.  Where  they  are  now  is  not  known,  but  in  both  places 
there  were  plenty  of  men  who  would  prefer  that  such  records 
should  not  remain  in  existence,  and  they  have  no  doubt  been 
destroyed. 

Although  unity  among  the  French  population  appears  to  have 
reigned    at    the    election    and     there    was     great     enthusiasm 


Ixiv  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

expressed  for  Clark  and  the  new  county  lieutenant,  there  was  no 
such  feeling  for  the  American  soldiers  or  for  the  numerous  traders 
and  land  speculators  who  had  already  found  their  way  into  the 
country.  The  backwoodsman  was  a  type  that  had  been  developed 
rather  slowly  in  the  Eastern  colonies ;  but  the  endless  Indian  war- 
fare, the  Hfe  of  the  woods,  the  separation  from  the  centers  of 
civiHzation,  the  need  of  reliance  on  self  had  produced  a  set  of 
men  well  fitted  for  the  task  of  winning  the  West.  Of  great  phy- 
sical strength,  brave  to  recklessness,  splendid  riflemen,  trained  in 
woodcraft  in  which  they  were  second  only  to  their  foes,  the 
Indians,  lovers  of  individual  freedom,  hostile  to  the  regulations 
of  society,  hard  drinkers,  suspicious,  quarrelsome,  intolerant,  un- 
cultured even  to  vulgarity,  they  had  all  the  virtues  as  well  as  the 
vices  of  the  Homeric  heroes. 

It  is  difficult  to  trace  the  origin  of  these  men  of  the  frontier, 
for  they  came  from  all  nations,  from  England,  Ireland,  Germany, 
and  Holland.  There  was  also  a  strong  strain  of  Scotch-Irish 
blood  from  western  Pennsylvania.  Som.e  came  from  respectable 
families  of  the  eastern  settlers;  many  had  fled  to  the  West  to 
escape  the  consequences  of  crime;  others  were  redemptioners. 
Men  of  noble  ideals  mingled  with  those  of  the  criminal  class, 
for  the  West  asked  no  questions  in  regard  to  the  origin  and 
past  life  of  men,  provided  they  were  courageous  and  could  wield 
an  axe  and  fire  a  gun.  W^hat  was  needed  were  men,  and  they  came 
from  ail  classes.  The  love  of  the  frontier  with  its  excitement  was 
in  their  blood  and  they  came  to  fight  the  Indians,  to  quarrel  among 
themselves,  take  up  the  land,  winning  it  from  the  Indians  and 
from  nature  in  a  way  that  no  other  men  could  have  done  so  well. 
The  well-controlled  colonies  of  the  French  with  their  many  pro- 
hibitions on  individual  initiative  had  failed  where  the  splendid 
self-reliance  and  personal  assertiveness  of  the  American  pioneers 
succeeded. 

The  men  trained  under  the  French  system  now  came  in  con- 
tact with  this  different  race  of  beings.  In  the  ensuing  struggle 
those  best  adapted  to  survive  in  the  life  of  the  backwoods  had  an 
advantage  which  they  used  without  restraint  and  without  com- 


INTRODUCTION  Ixv 

passion,  and  the  French  gave  way  before  the  egoism  of  the  Ameri- 
cans, for  whom  they  were  no  match.  There  was  little  to  unite 
these  discordant  elements.  The  French  were  Catholics;  the 
majority  of  Americans,  Protestant,  and  the  Calvinistic  blood  of 
the  Independents  and  Presbyterians  still  ran  warm  in  the  veins 
of  the  pioneers,  although  they  may  have  long  ceased  to  feel  the 
restraining  influence  of  religion.  For  them  the  Catholics  were 
enemies,  as  they  had  been  on  many  a  battle  field  of  the  Old  World. 
The  French  lived  on  good  terms  with  the  Indians,  the  pioneer 
knew  no  good  Indian  save  a  dead  one.  With  unremitting  and 
relentless  watchfulness  they  waged  that  war  of  extermination 
until  the  Indian  was  driven  from  the  coveted  prairies.  The 
friends  of  the  foe  who  had  murdered  with  such  cruel  barbarity 
father,  mother,  sister,  and  brother  of  these  stalwart  pioneers 
were  not  to  be  trusted,  and  at  every  Indian  uprising  the  French 
people  were  suspected.  The  French  had  been  educated  to 
respect  the  law  and  to  obey  the  magistrates.  With  their  little 
difficulties  they  were  accustomed  to  run  to  the  constituted  au- 
thority for  redress.  The  frontiersmen  preferred  to  execute  their 
own  law  and  in  any  dispute  were  themselves  judge,  jury  and 
executioner.  Let  a  disagreement  arise  and  there  followed  that 
terrific  fight  in  which  no  rule  was  known,  no  end  was  allowed, 
save  the  yielding  of  one  party  to  the  greater  physical  strength  of 
the  other.  Kicking,  throttling,  gouging  of  the  eyes,  biting  were 
all  permissible.  In  such  a  struggle  the  greater  strength  and 
weight  of  the  American  had  a  distinct  advantage  over  the  French- 
man. Hence  that  contempt  for  the  smaller  race  which  is  so 
marked  in  the  attitude  of  the  pioneer  for  his  French  neighbor. 
No  better  example  exists  of  their  differences  than  in  their  manner 
of  life.  The  frontiersmen  preferred  the  isolated  log  cabin,  built 
without  the  least  attempt  at  attractiveness;  bare  of  furniture, 
comfortless,  ill  kept,  life  here  was  unlovely,  individualistic,  and  un- 
social. Even  when  forced  for  safety  to  seek  the  shelter  of  the 
stockade,  they  brought  to  the  common  life  only  the  same  qualities. 
Amidst  the  stench  of  cattle  and  hogs  in  the  enclosure,  the  young 
were  brought  up  with  no  conception  of  a  quieter  and  more  lovely 


Ixvi  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

life.  The  hero  of  the  stockade  was  the  strongest  in  the  rough 
and  tumble  fight,  the  surest  shot,  the  killer  of  Indians.  The 
French  were  temperamentally  the  opposite;  their  mode  of  life 
had  more  refinement,  more  attempt  at  aesthetic  enjoyment,  was 
gentler  in  every  way.  Their  little  cottages  in  the  village  com- 
munity surrounded  by  the  picket  fence,  which  enclosed  a  garden 
with  vegetables  and  flowers,  set  them  apart  as  a  people  of  different 
ideas  and  civihzation. 

It  was  over  these  two  people  who  were  now  mingling  in  the  Illi- 
nois villages  that  Todd  was  called  to  rule.  The  soldiers  of  Clark 
had  answered  nobly  to  his  call  to  war  against  the  British  and 
Indians,  but  it  required  other  training  than  theirs  to  garrison 
a  village  of  peaceful  citizens.  When  the  spirit  of  self-abnegation, 
which  marked  the  army  of  backwoodsmen  on  the  campaign, 
had  disappeared,  the  equality  which  reigned  on  the  frontier  reas- 
serted itself  and  Clark's  influence  became  only  that  of  an  equal. 
The  obedience  yielded  to  him  in  an  emergency  and  in  the  face  of 
danger  was  past,  and  the  spirit  of  individual  assertiveness  was 
again  predominant. 

The  French  had  experienced  the  evils  of  this  rule  of  the  un- 
trained militia  from  Virginia  and  Kentucky,  and  were  glad  to 
be  finally  released  from  its  petty  tyranny.  They  saw  with  joy 
the  inauguration  of  the  civil  government,  for  the  court  would  be 
their  champion  against  the  soldiery ;  and  under  the  strong  hand  of 
the  lawcourt,  an  institution  which  the  French  were  accustomed 
to  respect,  order  would  again  be  restored  and  they  would  taste 
the  sweets  of  that  liberty  which  Clark  and  Todd  had  promised 
them.  The  court  was  French,  and  it  is  to  this  institution  that  the 
"villagers"  clung  throughout  the  following  years,  for  through  it 
alone  could  they  hope  to  bring  that  freedom  from  military  rule 
which  oppressed  them. 

The  reverse  of  the  picture  must  not  be  forgotten.  The  position 
of  the  Illinois  battalion  was  a  very  difficult  one.  The  men  were 
in  a  country  far  from  their  source  of  supplies,  surrounded  by 
hostile  tribes  of  Indians,  and  unable  to  confer  easily  with  the 
officials  in  Virginia.     They,  therefore,  were  frequently  forced  to 


INTRODUCTION  Ixvii 

act  independently  and  their  acts  were  not  always  confirmed  by 
the  Virginia  authorities.  Their  supply  of  money  from  the  state 
was  also  inadequate  for  the  work  they  had  to  perform.  This  was 
due  to  two  causes :  first  because  Virginia  did  not  fully  appreciate 
the  importance  of  holding  the  lUinois  —  that  was  a  need  better 
understood  by  the  Kentuckians ;  second,  the  finances  of  the  state 
were  such  that  there  was  no  supply  for  this  distant  country.  In 
1780,  Governor  Jefferson  wrote  to  Clark :  "  The  less  you  depend 
for  supplies  from  this  quarter  the  less  will  you  be  disappointed 
by  those  impediments  which  distances  and  a  precarious  foreign 
commerce  throws  in  the  way,  for  these  reasons  it  will  be  eligible 
to  withdraw  as  many  of  your  men  as  you  can  from  the  west  side  of 
the  Ohio  leaving  only  as  many  men  as  will  be  necessary  for  keep- 
ing the  Illinois  settlement  in  spirits,  but  we  must  accommodate 
our  measures  for  doing  this  to  our  means."^  In  the  previous 
year  the  situation  was  only  a  little  better.  It  was  the  necessity 
of  holding  the  country  at  any  cost  that  forced  upon  the  men  of  the 
West  the  use  of  measures  which  bore  with  harshness  on  the 
French,  measures  which  were  often  cruel  and  brutally  carried 
out.  That  they  held  the  territory  for  America  is  their  excuse. 
The  French  were  not  the  only  ones  to  suffer.  Clark  never  re- 
ceived just  recompense  for  his  labors,  and  many  personal  debts 
which  he  incurred  for  the  cause  were  never  paid.  Many  of  his 
officers  suffered  in  the  same  way  and  found  themselves  financially 
embarrassed  by  their  devotion  to  the  American  interests. 

No  sooner  was  the  court  of  Kaskaskia  established  than  it  took 
up  the  cause  of  the  French  and  attempted  to  put  an  end  to  the 
anarchy  which  threatened.  In  a  memorial  to  John  Todd  of  the 
twenty-fourth  of  May,  1779,^  the  justices  told  their  grievances  and 
demanded  reforms:  First,  ''The  soldiers  of  Fort  Clark  go  into 
the  commons  of  this  place  to  hunt  the  animals  of  the  undersigned 
petitioners  and  without  giving  heed  to  the  brandings  or  to  whom 
they  may  belong  they  have  enclosed  them  in  the  fort  and  killed 
them  without  giving  notice  to  anyone.     Such  acts  have  never  been 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  29J14. 

^Kas.  Rec,  Pol.  Papers.    Original  MS.    Translation  by  the  editor. 


Ixviii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

seen  in  this  country  before.  It  is  contrary  to  all  law  and  particu- 
larly contrary  to  the  usages  and  customs  of  an  independent  country 
like  this  one,  which  has  been  announced  to  be  free.  In  a  place 
where  each  should  be  able  to  do  with  his  property  what  pleases 
him  and  to  enjoy  it  as  seems  good  to  him,  the  soldiers  have  killed 
dray-oxen,  milch  cows,  and  other  animals  belonging  to  people 
who  can  not  subsist  without  them.  It  causes  for  some  a  lack 
of  means  for  the  cultivation  of  the  fields  and  for  others  a  lack  of 
nourishment  and  subsistence  for  the  family.  We  have  always 
been  ready  to  furnish  animals  for  the  garrison  in  so  far  as  it  was 
in  our  power  and  are  still  ready  as  far  as  we  have  resources.  If 
it  is  permitted  that  our  beasts  of  burden  be  killed,  how  can 
we  cultivate  our  fields  and  furnish  the  needs  of  the  garri- 
son and  those  of  our  families?  If  such  abuses  continue, 
which  tend  to  the  ruin  of  the  colony,  what  will  become  of  the 
colonists  ?" 

The  second  subject  of  the  m.emorial  was  against  the  sale  of 
intoxicating  liquors  to  the  Indians.  They  said  that  the  French  had 
made  an  agreement  not  to  sell  any  liquors  to  the  Indians,  as  it  had 
been  the  cause  of  disaster  to  the  colony  and  they  begged  Todd 
to  put  an  end  to  this  trade. ^  The  third  subject  was  in  regard  to 
trade  with  the  slaves  without  premission  of  the  masters.  The 
black  law  was  still  in  force  and  forbade  such  trade,  which  was 
nevertheless  practiced  and  caused  the  slaves  to  be  insolent  and 
disorderly. 

On  this  last  subject  Clark  had  already  issued  an  ordinance,  and 
at  this  very  time  there  was  in  process  the  trial,  which  had  begun 
in  the  courts  founded  by  Clark,  of  the  slaves  for  poisoning.^  The 
case  was  proved  against  two  and  a  sentence  of  execution  pro- 
nounced against  them,  so  that  this  kind  of  disorder  from  the  slaves 
received  a  check. 

The  subject  of  trade  in  Hquor  with  the  Indians  was  apparently 
regulated  by  the  issuance  of  trade  licenses;  at  least  there  are  in 
existence  two  such  Hcenses,  one  of  which  is  in  this  volume  and  the 

1  Refers  to  the  agreement  under  the  Rocheblave  administration.     See  supra,  p.  xxxii. 

2  See  post,  pp.  4,  13. 


INTRODUCTION  Ixix 

other  may  be  found  in  John  Todd's  Record-Book}  Since  these 
measures  did  not  prove  efifective,  the  court,  on  September  6th, 
issued  a  proclamation  prohibiting  the  sale  of  Hquors  to  the  savages 
and  the  buying  of  any  commodity  from  slaves  without  permission 
of  their  owners.^ 

The  first  subject  was  beyond  the  power  of  the  civil  government 
and  was  never  fully  righted,  for  this  grievance  concerning  the 
killing  of  cattle  belonging  to  the  French  appears  in  all  subsequent 
petitions  of  the  inhabitants  of  the  villages,  whether  they  addressed 
themselves  to  Virginia,  to  Congress,  or  elsewhere.  The  position 
was  a  difficult  one,  and  the  soldiers  left  to  shift  for  themselves 
recurred  again  and  again  to  this  method  of  foraging.  During 
the  summer  of  1779  some  steps  seem  to  have  been  taken  to  stop 
the  abuse,  for  the  officers  complained  several  time  of  the  lack  of 
supplies,  and  the  imminent  need  of  military  seizure,  which  they 
were  forbidden  to  make. 

There  was  another  vital  question  in  the  lUinois  which  demanded 
the  attention  of  the  county  lieutenant.  The  land  was  fertile,  and 
he  had  every  reason  to  fear  that  there  would  be  a  rush  of  settlers 
to  the  county,  which  would  now  fall  under  the  land  laws  of  Vir- 
ginia that  permitted  the  greatest  license  to  settlers  in  preempt- 
ing land.  The  result  in  Kentucky  had  been  land-speculation, 
law-suits,  and  general  anarchy.  This  Todd  hoped  to  prevent  in 
the  Illinois.  The  French  settlers  were  always  opposed  to  the 
indiscriminate  giving  away  of  unpatented  land  and,  in  the  peti- 
tion of  May  24th  already  mentioned,  they  called  Todd's  attention 
to  some  adventurers  who  were  taking  up  large  tracts  of  land  near 
their  village,  and  urged  him  to  save  at  least  the  rich  river  bottom. 
They  did  not  know  that  the  Virginia  assembly  in  May,  at  the 
time  this  question  was  under  discussion  in  Illinois,  had  passed  a 
law  forbidding  settlements  north  of  the  Ohio  river.^  Todd  was 
directly  interested  in  the  land  question,  as  he  had  been  appointed 
the  surveyor  of  the  county  by  the  corporation  of  William  and  Mary 

*  See  post,  p.  463;  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collection  iv.,  296. 

2  Kas.  Rec,  Court  Record,  p.  238. 

3  Hening,  Statutes,  x.,  32. 


Ixx  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

college.^  In  the  middle  of  June  he  "enjoined  all  persons  what- 
soever from  making  any  New  Settlements  upon  the  Flat  lands, 
unless  In  manor  and  form  of  Settlem*  as  heretofore  made  by  the 
French  Inhabitants  untill  further  Orders  given  hereon."^  That 
Todd  had  no  intention  of  forbidding  settlers  in  the  prairies  is 
evident  from  the  proclamation,  and  after  Todd's  departure  neither 
the  incoming  immigrants  nor  the  officers  of  the  troops  paid  any 
heed  to  the  Virginia  legislation.  In  fact  many  Americans  found 
their  way  to  the  region  and  were  welcomed  by  Clark,  who  believed 
that  the  settlement  of  families  was  the  best  way  to  hold  a  country. 
In  1779  Montgomery  mentions  the  departure  of  several  families 
from  Kaskaskia  to  form  a  settlement  up  a  creek  about  thirty 
miles.^ 

But  it  was  not  the  single  settler  only  who  had  to  be  watched. 
No  sooner  had  the  news  of  the  conquest  of  the  Illinois  reached 
the  East  than  the  Illinois  and  the  Wabash  Land  companies, 
which  had  been  formed  diuring  the  British  period,^  decided  to 
pool  their  interests  and  begin  immediately  to  make  settlements. 
Only  a  few  days  after  the  Virginia  assembly  passed  the  act 
creating  the  county  of  Illinois,  on  December  26th,  William  Mur- 
ray on  behalf  of  himself  and  the  other  proprietors  presented  a 
memorial  in  which  he  set  forth  the  fact  of  the  purchase  of 
lands  from  the  Indians  and  the  purpose  of  making  a  settle- 
ment as  soon  as  the  state  of  affairs  in  the  West  would  permit. ^ 
In  order  not  to  allow  the  claim  to  lapse  through  non-occupancy, 
the  companies  made,  the  next  spring,  preparations  to  form  a  settle- 
ment on  the  Wabash,  and  appointed  on  March  26th  John  Campbell 
as  their  western  agent.  ^  There  was  sent  him  a  proclamation  to 
be  published  in  which  the  most  liberal  terms  were  offered  to 
the  first  five  hundred  settlers  in  the  town  which  it  was  proposed 

^  Papers  oj  Old  Cong.,  Ind.  Papers,  lvi.,  97. 

2  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collection,  iv.,  301. 

»  Dr.  MSS.,  49J74- 

*  See  supra,  p.  xxx. 

5  Va.  State  Papers,  i.,  314. 

^  Can.  Archives,  B.,  184,  vol.  i.,  pp.  119  and  123.  Todd  found  difl&culty  in  deciding  what 
to  do  about  their  title.     Maaon,  John  Todd  Papers,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  318. 


INTRODUCTION  Ixxi 

to  establish.  The  enterprise  was  not  pushed  further  at  this 
time. 

The  next  subject  to  engage  Todd's  attention  was  the  paper 
money.  While  on  his  way  to  Illinois,  he  had  learned  that  the 
issues  of  continental  paper  money  of  the  dates  May  20,  1777, 
and  April  11,  1778,  were  ordered  to  be  paid  into  the  continental 
loan  offices  by  the  first  of  June,  1779,  or  they  would  become 
worthless;^  but  he  hoped  to  obtain  a  longer  time  for  the  money 
from  the  Illinois.  Todd  issued  a  proclamation  on  July  27th, 
which  he  repeated  on  August  2  2d,  setting  forth  the  necessity 
for  depositing  with  him,  the  called-in  emissions  for  which  he 
would  issue  certificates.  In  all  between  fifteen  and  twenty 
thousand  dollars  were  thus  collected  and  deposited  with  the  no- 
tary; but  nothing  further  was  done  with  it.^  It  was  estimated 
that  there  remained  in  the  hands  of  the  inhabitants  twenty  thou- 
sand more  notes  of  these  issues,  which  were,  of  course,  of  no 
value  whatsoever.  Another  loss  to  the  French  came  from  the 
large  amount  of  forged  money  that  was  put  in  circulation.  It 
was  a  common  practice,  and  an  easy  one,  to  counterfeit  the  con- 
tinental and  colonial  paper  and  large  amounts  were  carried  to 
the  Illinois.  This,  however,  was  refused  by  Todd  and  the  more 
intelligent  merchants.  The  result  of  all  these  operations  was 
that  confidence  in  the  paper  money  was  greatly  weakened  until 
the  French  refused  to  take  it  at  all. 

It  was  to  buoy  up  the  sinking  credit  of  this  paper  that  Todd 
devised  a  scheme  to  call  in  a  further  amount,  since  he  thought 
the  prime  cause  of  its  depreciation  was  the  quantity  in  circula- 
tion.^   On  June  nth  he  wrote  to  the  Court  of  Kaskaskia  the 

iTodd  to  Clark,  March  26,  1779,  Dr.  MSS.,  49J33. 

2  In  1790  Governor  St.  Clair  found  it  still  packed  away  in  the  notary's  office.  Amer. 
Slate  Papers,  Pub.  Lands,  i.,  20. 

'  The  rapid  depredation  of  the  continental  money  in  the  year  1779  may  be  seen  by  this 
schedule  drawn  up  by  Todd  and  Clark.  (Journal  of  Northwestern  Commissioner s,V2i.  State 
Library). 

From  the   ist  May  till  Col.  Montgomery's  Arrival  in  June      Kas.  St.  Vine.  Koho. 

at  Kaskaskia  One  Specied[?]  Dollar  was  equal  to  s  or  6  3^  4 
From  10  June  till  ye  10  July  during  the  time  ye  Reg.  was  at 

Kaskaskia  &  on  the  way  to  St.  Vin.                                  10  4?                5 

From  the  loth  July  till  the  Middle  Augs.                                  lo  4  to    8            6 

from  IS  Augs.  till  ist  Oct.                                                          15  8  to  12            8 

from  ist  Oct.  till  15  Nov.                                                       to  30  to  15  10 


Ixxii  ILIJNOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

following  letter:  "The  only  method  that  America  has  to  sup- 
port the  present  just  War  is  by  her  Credit.  That  Credit  at  pre- 
sent is  her  Bills  emitted  from  the  different  Treasuries  by  which 
she  engages  to  pay  the  Bearer  at  a  certain  time  Gold  &  Silver 
in  Exchange.  There  is  no  friend  to  American  Independence 
who  has  any  Judgment  but  soon  expects  to  see  it  equal  to  Gold 
&  Silver.  Some  disaffected  persons  &  designing  Speculators 
discredit  it  through  Enmity  or  Interest;  the  ignorant  multitude 
have  not  Sagacity  enough  to  examine  into  this  matter  &  merely 
from  its  uncommon  Quantity  &  in  proportion  to  it  arises  the 
Complaint  of  its  want  of  Credit. 

"This  has  for  some  years  been  the  Case  near  the  Seat  of  War; 
the  disorder  has  spread  at  last  as  far  as  the  Illinois  &  calls  loudly 
for  a  Remedy.  In  the  interior  Counties  this  Remedy  is  a  heavy 
Tax,  now  operating,  from  which  an  indulgent  government  has 
exempted  us.  one  only  remedy  remains  which  is  lodged  within 
my  power  that  is  by  receiving  on  behalf  of  Government  such 
sums  as  the  people  shall  be  induced  to  lend  upon  a  sure  fund  & 
thereby  decreasing  the  Quantity."^  The  plan  as  he  set  it  forth 
was  to  borrow  33,333^  dollars  of  Treasury  notes,  whether  of 
Virginia  or  the  United  Colonies,  on  certificates  for  21,000  acres 
of  land  near  Cahokia.  The  lender  was  obliged  to  make  a  loan  of 
at  least  $100,  for  which  he  or  his  heirs  should  be  entitled  to  demand 
within  two  years  a  title  to  his  allotment  of  land,  or  the  sum  origin- 
ally advanced  in  gold  or  silver  with  5  per  cent  interest  per  annum, 
at  the  option  of  the  state. 

This  project  met  the  approval  of  the  governor  and  council 
but  had  to  be  brought  before  the  assembly  for  confirmation.^ 
Todd  in  the  meanwhile  appointed  commissioners  to  receive  the 
money  and  large  sums  were  paid  in  and  sealed  up,  for  which 
certificates  were  issued.  The  matter  stopped  there,  for  nothing 
came  of  the  project  except  the  exchange  of  the  paper  for  the 
certificates.^ 

1  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  297. 

2  Va.  Stale  Papers,  i.,  326. 

'Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  298  et  seq.;  Dr.MSS., 
46Jso- 


INTRODUCTION  Ixxiii 

Although  Todd  had  been  compelled  by  law  to  take  up  the 
recalled  emissions  and  to  refuse  the  counterfeits  and  this  last 
scheme  for  bolstering  up  the  credit  of  the  paper  currency  was  a 
common  enough  one  in  his  time,  the  effect  of  all  these  transactions 
was  to  throw  further  discredit  on  the  currency  and  make  the 
purchase  of  provisions  for  the  army  almost  impossible.  For 
this  he  was  held  responsible  and  roundly  denounced  by  the  army 
officers,  who  had  themselves  been  the  most  at  fault  in  passing  a 
depreciated  currency  at  par  value,  a  deceit  which  caused  the 
French  to  lose  all  faith  in  their  money  and  their  word.  The  blame, 
however,  had  to  be  placed  on  some  one  and  the  head  of  the  civil 
government  was  the  victim.  The  animosity  thus  aroused  re- 
mained long  after  Todd  had  left  the  Illinois  and  had  met  his  death 
at  the  battle  of  Blue  Licks.  Sometime  after  1790,  William 
Shannon,  who  was  in  1779  commissary  in  the  Illinois,  wrote  of 
thefee  transactions:  "it  was  owing  to  the  false  suggestions  of  Col. 
Todd,  a  gentleman  who  came  to  the  Illinois  in  the  month  of  May, 
1779,  in  character  of  chief  magistrate,  who  I  believe  by  his  reports 
to  government  as  well  as  by  his  transactions  while  in  the  Illinois 
country  had  done  great  injury  to  the  inhabitants.  Immediately 
after  his  arrival  His  policy  was  to  put  a  total  stop  to  paper  credit 
which  he  did  by  putting  the  paper  money  he  found  in  the  hands 
of  the  different  Individuals  under  cover  and  sealing  it  up  (where 
a  great  part  of  it  still  remains)  and  giving  the  holders  thereof  a 
certificate  specifying  that  he  had  Inclosed  under  his  Private 
Seal  paper  bills  of  Credit  to  a  certain  amount  and  for  which  he 
promised  them  (as  he  said  they  had  been  imposed  on)  lands  in 
proportion  to  the  money  they  brought  to  him  to  secrete  for  them 
....  this  proceeding  put  a  total  stop  ever  after  to  paper  credit  in 
that  country."^ 

This  was  the  explanation  of  Todd's  actions  in  the  military 
circles.  Unjust  it  was  and  false;  but  Todd  found  himself,  as 
he  tried  to  protect  the  French,  more  and  more  in  opposition  to 
the  military  department.  And  yet  he  could  not  assume  the  leader- 
ship of  the  French  party,  because  of  his  duty  to  the  American 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  46JS0. 


Ixxiv  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

cause  and  of  the  necessity  of  maintaining  control  of  the  territory  at 
any  cost.  There  was  nothing  left  for  him  but  to  attempt  media- 
tion, which  was  foreordained  to  failure.  On  September  i8 
Richard  McCarty,  who  was  captain  of  the  company  stationed 
at  Cahokia,  wrote  Todd:  ^'I  dont  see  yet  through  the  designs 
of  a  few  dispicable  Inhabitants  who  say  they  are  authorized  by 
you,  to  parade  themselves  in  the  fields  Distroying  My  property 
when  there  are  Numbers  of  other  hogs  in  the  same  place  .... 
Indeed  unless  there  is  Soon  a  Change  for  the  Better  me  nor  my 
Soldiers  will  have  no  Business  hear.  Neither  can  we  stay  half 
Naked,  what  we  are  paid  with  Call'd  down  by  the  Civil  power. "^ 
The  same  writer  was  more  open  in  expressing  himself  to  Colo- 
nel Montgomery:  ''Colo.  Todd's  Residence  here  will  spoil 
the  people  intirely  for  the  inhabitants  no  more  Regard  us  than  a 
Parcel  of  Slaves."  He  also  says  it  would  be  a  good  thing  to  get 
Todd  out  of  the  country,  ''for  he  will  possitively  Sett  the  Inhabi- 
tants and  us  by  the  Ears  ....  In  some  complaints  by  the 
Inhabitants  the  other  day  he  wished  that  there  wasn't  a  soldier 

in  the  country I  have  never  Seen  the  people  of  this  place 

So  Mutinous  as  they  are  by  the  encouragement  of  Colo^  Todd, 
for  they  even  begin  to  threaten  to  turn  my  men  out  of  Doors 
and  god  knows  what  I  shall  do  If  they  do  for  we  are  not  Above 
20  Strong  and  them  Sick  that  I  could  depend  on  So  they  may 
Starve  us  if  they  like."^ 

This  outspoken  opposition  of  the  French  made  its  first  appear- 
ance at  Cahokia,  possibly  because  the  people  of  the  village  were 
more  independent  and  self-reliant,  but  probably  because  there 
never  was  a  large  garrison  in  the  village  and  it  was  far  from  the 
seat  of  government,  Kaskaskia.  Then  too  the  captain  in  com- 
mand was  well  known,  having  been  a  trader  in  Cahokia*  some 
years  before  the  coming  of  the  Virginians.  His  rapid  promotion 
in  the  army  had  somewhat  turned  the  head  of  this  Irishman  from 
Connecticut,  and  he  was  overbearing  and  arrogant  in  his 
relations  with  the  people.^     In  a  moment  of  anger  he  once  told 

*  See  post,  p.  615. 

2  See  post,  p.  616. 

3  For  biographical  note  on  McCarty  see  post,  p.  2,  n.  3 


INTRODUCTION  Ixxv 

them  that  he  wished  he  was  commander  in  chief  of  their  village 
and  he  would  send  some  of  the  inhabitants  in  chains  to  Virginia. ^ 
Todd  had  no  very  good  opinion  of  McCarty  and  later  told  the 
governor  that  he  had  "rendered  himself  disagreeable  by  endea- 
voring to  enforce  Military  law  upon  the  Civil  Department  at 
Kahos."2 

The  military  had  causes  for  complaint,  although  these  were 
not  due  to  Todd.  The  soldiers  were  ill  fed  and  badly  clothed 
as  the  means  of  supplying  their  needs  began  to  fail.  In  Septem- 
ber, Captain  John  Williams  wrote,  ''provisions  is  very  hard  to  be 
got  without  Peltry,"^  and  in  the  same  month  Colonel  Montgomery 
wrote  to  Clark :  "I  cant  not  tell  what  to  do  in  Regard  of  Clothing 
for  the  Soldiers  as  the  Goods  you  wrote  to  me  is  gon  ....  and 
I  would  Be  Glad  that  if  it  is  in  your  power  to  Send  a  Relefe  to 
me  for  the  Soldiers  if  it  is  onley  As  Much  as  will  Make  them  A 
little  Jump  Jacote  [Jacket?]  and  a  pear  of  overalls  I  think  they 
Mite  Scuffle  threw.  But  in  Regard  of  lining  there  are  Bad  of, 
But  if  I  had  Som  Strouding  I  Could  Exchang  it  for  lining  on  the 
other  Side  as  The  [sic]  have  all  Redy  offered  it  to  me."*  Mc- 
Carty's  tale  of  troubles  at  Cahokia  was  even  worse;  for  the  sol- 
diers were  deserting  daily  because  of  the  lack  of  clothing.* 

Thus  the  question  of  the  support  of  the  troops  had  become 
the  vital  issue  between  the  civil  government  and  the  army. 
The  French  were  unwilHng  to  part  with  their  goods  without 
some  assurance  of  payment,  for  they  had  learned  from  sad 
experience,  and  the  deception  in  regard  to  the  money  was  not 
the  only  one.  Many  of  the  bills  drawn  on  Oliver  Pollock  at  New 
Orleans  or  on  the  treasury  of  Virginia  by  the  officers  were  coming 
back  protested.  Even  when  merchandise  instead  of  money  or 
drafts  was  promised,  the  French  were  disappointed.  The 
experience  of  Gabriel  Cerre  is  one  that  occurred  not  once  but  many 

iSee  post,  p.  543. 

2  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  335. 

3  Dr.  MSS.,  49J73. 

*  Dr.  MSS.,  49J74-    The  punctuation  and  spelling  are  printed  as  they  are  in  the  original. 
6  See  post,  p.  6 IS 


Ixxvi  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

times.  In  a  letter  to  Clark  he  explained  that  he  had  used  his 
credit  to  purchase  supplies  for  the  troops  on  the  promise  of  the 
commissary  Shannon  to  repay  him  in  merchandise,  which  was  now 
refused  him.^  No  wonder  the  inhabitants  felt  they  could  do  no 
more.  They  had  furnished  their  goods  and  had  even  taken 
on  themselves  obligations  in  order  to  make  the  expedition  of 
Clark  a  success.  This  they  had  done  when  Clark  and  his  men 
first  surprised  lUinois  in  the  summer  of  1778.  They  had  also 
fitted  out  the  Vincennes  expedition  in  the  winter  with  supplies 
as  well  as  with  soldiers.  In  the  summer  of  1779,  Clark  had 
organized  a  campaign  against  Detroit  which  never  took  place, 
and  again  the  French  were  ready  with  supplies  and  volunteers. 
They  were  now  to  be  called  on  once  more  to  sell  their  goods 
without  hope  of  pay,  and  this  brought  on  the  crisis  that  proved 
to  Todd  the  illusiveness  of  his  mediation  and  the  impossibility  of 
the  maintenance  of  a  civil  government. 

After  the  failure  of  the  Detroit  expedition  the  troops  were 
assigned  for  the  winter  to  the  different  villages,  which  they  reached 
in  August.  Colonel  Montgomery  was  placed  in  command  of 
the  Illinois ;  Captain  John  Williams  was  stationed  at  Fort  Clark 
in  Kaskaskia,  Captain  Richard  McCarty,  at  Fort  Bowman  in 
Cahokia,  and  Captain  Shelby  at  Fort  Patrick  Henry  in  Vincennes.  ^ 

Preparations  were  immediately  made  to  collect  supplies  for 
the  winter  and  the  compaign  of  the  following  spring.  Hunters 
were  sent  out  to  obtain  meat,  and  the  ofi&cers  were  instructed  to 
purchase  provisions  from  the  inhabitants.  To  this  end,  Todd,  on 
August  II,  issued  a  proclamation  inviting  the  inhabitants  to  make 
contracts  with  the  commissaries  for  flour.  Knowing  the  attitude 
of  the  people  he  felt  the  necessity  of  adding:  'Tf  I  shall  be 
obliged  to  give  the  military  permission  to  press,  it  will  be  a  disad- 
vantage, and  what  ought  more  to  influence  Freemen  it  will  be 
a  dishonour  to  the  people."^  Nine  days  later  Colonel  Mont- 
gomery tried  the  effect  of  his  eloquence  and  proposed  that  one 
of  the  citizens  should  be  appointed  contractor  to  assess  the  inhabi- 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  49JS9- 

2  Clark's  general  orders,  Va.  State  Papers,  i.,  324;  Letter  of  Montgomery,  Ibid,  iii.,  441. 

3  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  305. 


INTRODUCTION  Ixxvii 

tants  for  the  benefit  of  the  service,  and  he  adds:  "The  com- 
plaint of  the  worthlessness  of  the  money  will  not  last  long,  I  hope, 
but  in  the  meantime  I  am  certain  that  all  good  compatriots  will 
set  about  assisting  the  garrison,  seeing  that  it  is  so  many  years 
that  their  fellow  patriots  have  carried  on  the  war  and  fought  and 
received  their  pay  in  this  same  money.  In  order  to  remedy  the 
difficulty  in  regard  to  the  counterfeit  money,  letters  of  exchange 
will  be  given  for  all  kinds  of  supplies."^  Two  days  later  Todd 
prohibited  the  exportation  of  any  provisions  from  the  Illinois 
for  sixty  days.  ''The  offender  herein  shall  be  subjected  to  im- 
prisonment for  one  month  and  more  over  forfeit  the  value  of 
such  exported  Provision.''  This  was  not  the  first  time  that  an 
embargo  had  been  laid  on  exportation,  for  two  months  before 
the  court  of  Kaskaskia  had  prohibited  exports  without  the  con- 
sent of  the  commandant.' 

The  result  of  these  measures  was  that  the  justices  of  the 
court  of  Kaskaskia  assessed  the  inhabitants  of  the  village  accord- 
ing to  their  wealth,  and  by  August  31  there  had  been  delivered 
into  the  storehouse  54,600  pounds  of  flour  and  a  promise  of 
1600  pounds  more  had  been  made.^  This  amount  was  consider- 
able, but  not  sufficient  to  support  the  large  army  that  Clark  ex- 
pected to  put  in  the  field  the  following  summer.  Other  efforts 
were  therefore  made  to  induce  the  people  to  part  with  further 
supplies,  and  Montgomery's  eloquence  was  again  called  into  use. 
The  effect  of  this  second  appeal  is  told  in  a  report  to  Clark  on 
October  2d.  "Since  I  receved  your  letters  I  have  Made  a  second 
Trial  in  Regard  of  laying  up  a  Sufficant  Quantity  of  provision 
But  it  seems  to  no  effect  as  the  [sic]  aGain  Repete  to  me  that 
themselves  and  Negroes  is  neaked  and  Without  I  can  suply  them 
with  Goods  or  peltry  it  will  be  out  of  their  poer  to  Supply  Me  in 
More  then  What  the  Already  have  promised  Me  which  will  not 
Be  over  half  enuf  to  Supply  An  aremey.  But  Sir  as  you  inform 
me  that  you  have  The  disposing  of  the  Goods  that  Colo  Rogers 

^  Kas.  Rec,  Letters.    Translation  by  the  editor. 

2  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  306;  Kas.  Rec 
Court  Record,  p.  232. 

3  Furnished  by  twenty-seven  inhabitants,  Dr.  MSS.,  46J17. 


Ixxviii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

tuck  up  to  the  Falls  if  you  thot  proper  to  Send  a  Quantity  of  them 
Back  to  Me  for  that  purpose  or  a  Quantity  of  dear  Skins  with 
what  peltrey  I  have  Got  from  Colo  Todd  I  think  it  then  Would 
Be  in  My  power  to  furnish  a  Quantity  Sufficant  for  the  Supply 
of  a  thousand  Men  Six  Months,  if  you  dont  think  proper  to 
send  them  Send  Me  perticuler  orders  in  Regard  of  teaking  it  by 
force  and  your  orders  shall  be  puntley  obed.  Sir  if  you  Sh  think 
of  Sending  them,  the  sooner  the  Better  as  I  have  Eshued  a  pro- 
clamation prohabiten  them  to  transport  aney  provision  of  aney 
Space  what  Ever  till  Such  times  I  have  answer  from  you  not 
letting  them  know  that  There  is  aney  Expectation  of  anything  of 
that  kind."i 

Todd  had  meanwhile  been  making  efforts  to  supply  the 
deficiency  with  some  success.  In  the  latter  part  of  September 
he  was  in  Cahokia  and  purchased  a  large  amount  of  peltry  from 
M.  Beauregard  of  St.  Louis,  for  which  he  paid  as  high  as  three 
livres  per  pound,  a  price  which  was  regarded  as  excessive.^  A 
draft  on  the  treasury  of  Virginia  was  given  for  this.  It  was 
this  peltry  that  Montgomery  had  been  counting  on  to  pay  some 
of  the  debts  to  the  French  at  the  Illinois.  Todd  preferred,  how- 
ever, to  reserve  it  for  future  emergencies  and  declared  that  the 
troops  must  be  maintained  by  the  credit  of  the  state.  Todd's 
persistence  in  this  policy  caused  his  administration  to  end  in 
failure,  since,  in  maintaining  it,  he  found  he  could  no  longer 
protect  the  people  from  military  levies.  Since  Montgomery 
had  failed  in  every  attempt  to  wrest  more  from  the  people,  he 
turned  the  business  over  to  Todd  who  said:  "that  he  Would 
Call  a  counsel  of  the  inhabitants  and  Compel  them  to  furnish. 
But  when  the  Met  the  punkley  denied  him,  he  then  told  Them 
if  the  did  not  Comply  he  would  Give  them  up  to  the  Militery  and 
Quit  Them,  the  answered  him  the  were  well  aGread  to  that 
&  So  parted."^ 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  49J76. 

"^  Jour,  of  Northwestern  Com.,  Va.  State  Lib.;  Mason,  John  Todd  Papers,  Chi.  Hist, 
Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  348,  358. 

3  Montgomery  to  Clark,  October  5,  1779,  Dr.  MSS.,  49J78. 


INTRODUCTION  Ixxix 

The  disappointment  of  Montgomery  at  this  outcome  appears 
very  genuine,  and  he  was  not  sure  what  to  do  next.  He  asks 
Clark:  "with  what  Face  Can  I  pretend  to  Seas  on  those  people 
provisio  When  the  know  that  we  have  Got  the  peltrey  and  will 
not  Give  it  to  Them  and  our  Money  is  of  no  acount  to  Them 
and  our  Bills  Comes  Back  protested.  The  have  Greate  Reason 
to  think  that  We  onley  intend  to  Baffle  them  but  Sir  you  May 
depend  that  I  will  do  Every  Thing  in  My  power  and  am  detrmed 
[sic]  to  have  the  provision  as  I  have  demanded  Every  Bushel  of 
Every  Space  the  have  to  Spare. "^ 

Todd  left  Illinois  in  November,^  shortly  after  his  failure,  and 
returned  to  Kentucky,  leaving  as  his  deputy,  Richard  Winston. 
He  had  become  discouraged  and  had  begged  to  be  permitted  to 
resign  as  early  as  August  13,  1779,  giving  as  his  reasons  the 
unwholesome  air,  the  distance  from  his  connections,  his  unfamii- 
iarity  with  the  language,  the  difficulty  of  procuring  many  of  the  con- 
veniences of  life,  and  the  impossibility  of  accompHshing  his  pur- 
poses with  the  means  at  hand.^  He  had  not  been  agreeably 
impressed  with  the  Illinois,  where  he  had  suffered  a  severe  sick- 
ness and  been  obliged  to  put  up  with  much  that  was  disagreeable. 
He  voiced  the  sentiments  of  many  Americans  of  his  time  when  he 
wrote,  "I  prefer  Kentucky  much  to  this  Country  either  for  the 
ambitious  man,  the  retired  farmer,  or  the  young  merchant."* 

In  leaving  he  did  not  resign  his  position  of  county  lieutenant,  but 
retained  it  at  least  through  the  next  year."*  It  has  been  an  open 
question  whether  Todd  ever  returned  to  Illinois  after  1779;  but 
a  letter  written  from  Vincennes  on  March  10,  1780,  in  which  he 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  4gj78. 

2  On  November  15,  Todd  was  in  Kaskaskia  evidently  expecting  to  start  for  the  Falls.  ' 
(Fa.  Slate  Papers,  i.,  358).     On  December  19,  he  wrote  from  the  Falls  to  Charles  Gratiot. 
(See  post,  p.  617). 

3  Mason,  John  Todd  Papers,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  319;  Dr.  MSS.,  23J103. 

*Todd  to  Fleming,  August  i8,  1779,  Dr.  MSS.,  23J103. 

5  This  is  an  unsettled  question.  His  successors  in  the  Illinois  continued  to  be  called 
deputy  county  lieutenants.  Wickliflfe  in  Morehead,  Settlement  of  Kentucky,  174,  implies  that 
he  did  not  resign  but  returned  to  the  county  several  times.  On  April  15,  1781,  Todd  wrote 
to  Jefferson  that  he  still  received  complaints  from  Illinois.  (Va.  State  Papers,  ii.,  44).  On  the 
other  hand  he  refused  to  give  orders  in  regard  to  a  consignment  of  goods  to  him  as  county 
lieutenant  on  Nov.  30,  1780.     {Ibid,  1.,  393). 


Ixxx  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

expressed  the  intention  of  going  to  Kaskaskia  the  next  day  leaves 
no  doubt  that  he  was  at  the  former  place  and  makes  it  probable 
that  he  was  in  the  latter. ^  Whether  he  went  or  not,  he  left  no 
evidences  of  his  stay,  for  affairs  by  that  time  had  passed  far  be- 
yond his  control.  Later  he  thought  of  returning,  for,  in  1781, 
learning  that  Virginia  was  planning  to  give  up  Illinois  to  the 
United  States,  he  offered  his  services  as  surveyor  in  that  country, 
a  position  he  had  previously  held.^  After  his  departure  the  civil 
officers  and  the  French  still  kept  up  a  correspondence  with  him, 
and  his  interest  in  the  affairs  of  the  distant  county  ceased  only 
with  his  death. 

As  we  have  seen,  one  of  the  last  acts  of  Todd  was  to  deliver 
the  inhabitants  into  the  hands  of  the  military,  since  the  civil  govern- 
ment had  failed  in  its  principal  mission,  the  maintenance  of  the 
troops.  Thereafter  the  army  was  to  collect  its  own  supplies. 
The  method  employed  by  Colonel  Montgomery  during  the  subse- 
quent weeks  is  clearly  shown  by  the  following  petition  which  was 
signed  by  a  large  number  of  the  inhabitants  of  Kaskaskia  on 
December  8,  1779:  "To  the  Magistrates  of  the  district  of  Kas- 
kaskia, Gentlemen:  We  ask  of  you  in  whom  we  put  our  confi- 
dence and  whom  we  have  elected  to  govern  this  country  according 
to  the  laws  which  you  have  caused  to  be  announced  to  us  in  your 
office,  is  it  not  full  time  that  you  put  an  end  to  the  brigandage 
and  tyranny  which  the  military  have  exercised  among  us  so 
long?  Should  not  the  military  be  content  to  see  that  we  are 
depriving  ourselves  of  every  necessity  in  order  to  furnish  their 
subsistence  and  have  not  left  ourselves  sufficient  for  the  sup- 
port of  our  families  and  of  our  slaves,  from  whom  we  can  not  ob- 
tain any  service  in  a  season  so  severe?  Can  we  with  tranquil 
eyes  see  the  animals,  most  necessary  for  agriculture  and  other 
work,  killed  every  day  ? 

"You  have  a  sure  means,  gentlemen,  of  putting  an  end  to 
such  disorders;  but  can  we  even  address  you  in  the  hope  of 
causing  you  to  see  some  glimmer  of  that  liberty  which  has  been 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  S0J80. 

2  Papers  of  Old  Cong.  Ind.  Papers,  Ivi.,  97. 


INTRODUCTION  Ixxxi 

so  often  announced,  when  you  are  acting  in  concert  with  those 
who  oppress  us  by  taking  from  us  the  means  of  living  and  from 
themselves  also  ?  We  do  not  believe  that  it  is  necessary  to  report 
to  you  in  this  petition  the  subject  of  our  complaints,  since  all  the 
grievances  have  taken  place  before  your  eyes. 

"  Furtiiermore  you  ought  to  perceive,  gentlemen,  that  the 
famine  has  begun  to  be  felt  in  this  country  and  that  we  can  with 
difficulty  supply  with  food  those  who  truly  merit  rations  on 
account  of  their  service  and  should  not  be  obliged  to  nourish 
and  warm  the  useless  members  of  the  state.  You  ought  to 
demand  an  exact  statement  of  the  number  to  receive  rations  in 
order  that,  when  the  troops  shall  have  need  of  asking  you  there- 
for, you  can  deliver  what  is  right. 

"  Furthermore,  notice,  gentlemen,  that  there  are  in  this  village 
only  about  ten  houses  which  can  make  remittances  and  that  they 
are  believed  to  be  richer  than  they  really  are.  We  are  born  free 
and  we  wish  to  enjoy  the  liberty  of  true  citizens. 

"You  ought  also  to  observe,  gentlemen,  that  this  village  has 
supported  all  the  burden  and  expense  since  the  arrival  of  the 
Americans  and  that  the  other  villages  have  felt  no  burden  or  a 
very  little.  We  hope  that  you  will  make  them  contribute  to  the 
maintenance  of  the  troops,  since  they  are  better  able  than  we  are 
according  to  their  number.  "^ 

The  magistrates  took  action  the  next  day  and  embodied  the 
substance  of  the  foregoing  complaint  to  them  in  a  demand  on 
Colonel  Montgomery  to  put  an  end  to  the  grievances.  They 
pointed  out  that  many  useless  slaves  were  being  supported  in 
the  fort,  and  that  there  was  a  great  waste  of  firewood.  Their 
authority  to  make  this  demand  was  set  forth  in  the  following 
words:  "Since  our  duty  exacts  that  we  watch  over  the  public 
safety  and  at  the  same  time  over  the  American  welfare,  we  demand, 
sir,  that  from  now  on  the  troops  shall  not  have  the  authority  to 
take  anything  at  the  houses  of  the  inhabitants  without  an  order 
from  us  according  to  article  13  of  the  declaration  of  rights  by  the 
assembly  of  Virginia ;  which  assembly  has  authorized  us  to  main- 

^  Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers,  a  copy  by  the  Kaskaskia  clerk.     Translation  by  the  editor 


Ixxxii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

tain  the  people  of  this  country  in  all  their  rights  and  liberties. 
It  is  there  set  forth  that  the  military  ought  to  be  under  the  most 
complete  subordination  to,  and  be  governed  by,  the  civil  power, 
to  which  declaration  up  till  to-day  the  military  has  given  no 
attention. 

"We  hope,  sir,  that  you  will  give  attention  to  our  just  repre- 
sentation without  forcing  us  to  the  disagreeable  duty  of  being 
obliged  to  appeal  to  his  Excellency,  the  Governor,  and  to  the 
Honorable  Assembly  of  Virginia."^ 

Montgomery  paid  no  heed  to  this  memorial  or  to  the  threat  of 
appeal  to  the  governor  of  Virginia.  He  regarded  their  demand 
for  a  statement  of  the  number  of  those  who  were  supported  in  the 
fort  as  an  insult  and  an  impertinence,  and  ordered  his  troops  to 
go  from  house  to  house  to  collect  whatever  they  required,  and  to 
shoot  the  animals  on  the  commons.  There  were  at  the  time 
only  thirty-eight  soldiers  in  the  fort,  but  with  these  there  were 
many  Americans  who  had  come  with  their  families  ^o  settle,  and 
also  slaves,  all  of  whom  the  inhabitants  were  compelled  to  sup- 
port.^ The  winter  was  a  very  hard  one,  the  most  severe  that 
had  been  known  for  years,  and  the  suffering  of  the  people  was 
very  great. ^  In  spite  of  this  Montgomery  proceeded  to  harsher 
methods.  There  is  in  existence  a  letter  written  by  him  to  Deputy 
County  Lieutenant  Winston,  on  March  5th,  which  shows  to  what 
lengths  he  was  ready  to  go  in  order  to  obtain  the  supplies  which 
he  needed.  After  making  the  usual  demands,  he  says:  "and 
before  that  I  suffer  as  much  more,  I  beg  you  would  inform  them 
to  put  their  Guns  in  good  order,  as  I  dont  want  to  take  them  at 
any  disadvantage.  As  if  they  dont  furnish  I  shall  look  on  them 
as  Traitors  to  the  cause  of  america,  and  Treat  them  Accord- 
ingly."" 

Montgomery  took  the  hint  in  regard  to  the  other  villages, 
however,  and  went  to  Cahokia  in  January,  1780,  where  he  de- 

1  Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers,  copy  by  Kaskaskia  clerk.     Translated  by  the  editor. 

2  Memorial  of  people  of  Kaskaskia,  to  governor  of  Virginia,  May  4,  1781,  Menard  Col., 
Tard.  Papers,  original  MS.  with  signatures. 

3  Can.  Archives,  B.,  100,  p.  370;   Va.  State  Papers,  i.,  338. 

*  Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers.  Copy,  evidently  in  Winston's  handwriting,  and  certified 
by  the  clerk  and  Winston. 


I 


INTRODUCTION  Ixxxiii 

manded  supplies  on  the  ground  that  the  other  villages  had  given 
in  proportion  to  their  wealth.  The  court  of  Cahokia  agreed  that 
a  census  of  the  population  should  be  taken  and  each  person  com- 
pelled to  furnish  supplies  according  to  his  means.  The  Caho- 
kians  did  not  have  so  much  cause  for  complaint  as  the  people 
of  Kaskaskia,  for  during  this  winter  there  were  no  troops  quar- 
tered in  their  village.  They  preferred  no  doubt  to  pay  the  tax 
rather  than  to  bring  upon  themselves  a  return  of  the  evils  they 
had  suffered  during  the  preceding  fall,  when  they  had  been  com- 
pelled to  receive  the  troops  into  their  homes,  to  furnish  all  supplies, 
and  finally  to  submit  to  the  seizure  of  the  flour  in  their  mills,  which 
were  then  sealed  with  the  seal  of  Virginia.  Such  acts  had  alienated 
the  Cahokians,  who  had  been  excited  to  deeds  of  heroism  and 
self  denial  under  the  leadership  of  Joseph  Bowman  in  the  winter 
of  1778-1779.* 

When  the  change  of  government  had  failed  to  satisfy  the  French 
and  the  presence  of  the  soldiers  had  led  to  disorder  and  tyranny, 
there  began  a  steady  stream  of  emigration  to  the  Spanish  bank, 
which  ended  in  almost  depopulating  some  of  the  villages  of  the 
American  Bottom.  Among  the  emigrants  were  the  most  impor- 
tant and  progressive  of  the  French  inhabitants.  One  of  the 
first  to  leave  was  the  richest  and  foremost  citizen  of  Kaskaskia, 
Gabriel  Cerr^,  who  emigrated  to  St.  Louis  either  in  the  fall  of 
1779  or  the  following  winter.  Charles  Gratiot  of  Cahokia  soon 
followed  his  example,  and  many  others  went  with  them  "to  seek 
an  asylum  where  they  find  the  protection  which  is  due  a  free 
people.  "2  Without  their  leaders  the  French  were  less  able  to 
hold  their  own  than  before.  They,  however,  made  their  appeal 
to  Virginia,  and  numerous  were  the  petitions  of  individuals  for 
the  payment  of  what  was  owing  them.  About  this  time  an  agent, 
one  Lajeunesse,  was  appointed  to  represent  the  French  interests 
at  the  capital;  but  nothing  was  accomplished,  for  Virginia  had 
no  money  to  use  for  investigation  or  to  pay  claims,  however  just, 

1  See  post,  pp.  35,  547,  610. 

2  Menard  Col.,  Tard  Papers,    Memorial  of  Kaskaskians,  to  Va.  Commissioners,  March 
1783.     Original  MS. 


Ixxxiv         ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

against  her.^  In  fact  it  was  at  this  time,  as  we  have  seen,  that 
Jefferson  wrote  to  Clark  that  it  would  be  necessary  to  with- 
draw as  many  of  the  troops  as  possible  from  the  territory  north  of 
the  Ohio,  for  he  need  expect  no  help  or  supplies  from  the  state.^ 

The  people  of  Illinois  did  not  receive,  at  this  gloomy  moment, 
that  assistance  from  their  own  ofl&cers  against  their  oppressors 
that  they  had  a  right  to  expect.  Instead  the  justices  of  Kaskaskia 
seem  to  have  tried  to  gain  what  personal  advantage  they  could 
from  the  situation.  In  the  midst  of  the  troubles  and  poverty  of 
the  winter,  when  the  people  were  attempting  to  withstand  the  exac- 
tions of  Montgomery,  the  justices  of  the  court  were  demanding 
pay  for  their  services.^  The  magistrates  found  their  office,  more- 
over, sufficiently  lucrative  to  wish  to  retain  it;  for,  when  the 
time  came  for  a  new  election,  none  was  held,  and,  with  a  few 
changes  to  fill  vacancies,  the  justices  remained  the  same  for  over 
two  years.  This  irregularity  is  striking  when  compared  with 
the  annual  elections  for  the  court  at  Cahokia.  But  Kaskaskia 
was  not  alone  in  troubles  of  this  character;  the  original  justices 
at  Vincennes  clung  to  office  until  1787.'* 

The  court  was  also  accused  by  Jean  Girault,  state's  attorney, 
with  being  lax  in  the  performance  of  its  duty.  Many  settlers 
were  straggling  into  the  colony  and  taking  up  land  both  within 
the  village  by  purchase  and  by  grants  from  the  court  of  unpatented 
lands,  a  custom  which  had  been  permitted  by  Todd  and  continued 
by  his  successors.  The  situation  was  such  that  the  government 
in  the  Illinois  could  not  give  heed  to  the  general  law  of  Virginia 
forbidding  this  practice;  for  the  immigrants  were  there,  fre- 
quently with  their  families,  and  had  come  without  making  pro- 
vision for  the  future,  should  they  fail  to  receive  land  to  cultivate.^ 
Clark  himself  had  frequently  approved  of  protecting  the  infant 
colonies  by  this  means,  and  the  officers  of  Virginia  were  among 
the  first  to  accept  grants  from  the  court.     One  of  the  earliest 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  50J54. 

^  Dr.  MSS.,  29J14;  see  also  supra  Ixvii. 

3  Dr.  MSS.,  S0J5.     Original  MS. 

*  Dunn,  Indiana,  passim. 

8  Dodge  to  governor  of  Va.,  August  i,  1780,  Va.  State  Papers,  i.,  368. 


INTRODUCTION  Ixxxv 

records  of  a  land  concession  of  this  character  is  that  of  one  made 
to  Colonel  Montgomery.  The  Indian  agent,  John  Dodge,  re- 
ceived in  the  year  1780  several  such  patents.  ^  Very  few  of  the 
French  seized  the  opportunity  to  obtain  such  concessions  at  Kas- 
kaskia  and  the  number  was  even  less  at  Cahokia,  provided  no 
account  is  taken  of  Prairie  du  Pont  to  which  Cahokia  had  another 
title.  It  was  not  against  this  practice  of  conceding  land  that 
Girault  inveighed;  but  he  critised  the  court's  laxity  in  not  invest- 
igating the  past  of  these  individuals,  who  were  making  their  homes 
in  the  community,  to  learn  if  they  were  British  agents,  and  its 
neglect  to  demand  of  them  the  oath  of  allegiance  to  the  United 
States  and  Virginia.  He  urged  the  justices  to  compel  all  strangers 
to  take  this  oath  immediately  or  he  would  be  obliged  to  report 
them  to  the  authorities.  He  advised  them  to  avoid  such  a  neces- 
sity, for  their  position  was  very  critical,  since  they  had  many 
enemies.^ 

Girault  gave  his  attention  to  the  execution  of  the  law  in  other 
particulars.  He  forbade  the  justices  to  arrest  parties  without 
proper  hearing,  and  tried  to  help  them  keep  the  peace  by  persuad- 
ing Montgomery  to  permit  the  civil  authorities  to  use  the  military 
prison  so  that  their  commands  would  be  obeyed,  a  privilege  which 
Montgomery  later  withdrew.^ 

That  protection  from  military  oppression,  which  might  have 
been  expected,  was  not  given  by  the  deputy  county  lieutenant 
appointed  by  Todd.  Perhaps  it  was  too  much  to  expect  that 
Winston  should  succeed  where  Todd  had  failed,  but  at  least 
some  opposition  to  the  military  exactions  should  have  been 
attempted.  The  character  of  Richard  Winston  is  a  difficult  one 
to  read,  for  our  knowledge  of  him  depends  on  the  pen  pictures 
drawn  by  his  enemies,  and  these  are  not  flattering.  He  came 
originally  from  Virginia  and  had  been  in  Illinois  since  early  in 
the  British  period."    With  other  traders  he  had  suffered  losses 

^  Kas.  Rec,  Land  Grants. 
2  Kas.  Rec,  Letters.     Original  MS. 

^Kas.  Rec,  Letters.  Original  MSS.;  Winston  to  Todd,  October  24,  1780,  Va.  State 
Papers,  i.,  381. 

*He  was  one  of  the  original  members  of  the  Indiana  Co.,  Va.  State  Papers,  vi.,  4.  See 
Jenning's  Journal,  March  10,  1766,  Pennsylvania  Hist.  Soc.'s  lib. 


Ixxxvi         ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

in  the  Pontiac  war.  With  Kennedy  he  was  an  agent  for  George 
Morgan,  and  had  won  the  favor  of  Clark  at  the  time  of  the  occu- 
pation of  Kaskaskia.  His  nature  seems  to  have  been  one  to 
inspire  distrust  rather  than  confidence,  for  he  was  suspected 
of  dishonesty  by  every  man  with  whom  he  had  business  or  politi- 
cal relations.  His  partner  Kennedy  suspected  him  of  having 
sold  the  cargo  of  a  hatteau  at  New  Orleans  and  pocketed  the 
proceeds.^  Murray  feared  that  he  was  going  to  play  the  rogue  at 
one  time.^  Todd  left  the  peltry  fund  which  he  had  obtained  in 
St.  Louis  in  charge  of  Winston  and  Montgomery,  and  both  these 
financial  geniuses  made  the  gravest  accusations  of  dishonesty 
against  each  other.^ 

From  the  fall  of  1779  till  January  1783,  Winston  was  on  ac- 
count of  his  position  one  of  the  chief  men  in  the  Illinois,  and  in 
many  ways  he  might  have  promoted  a  happier  feeling  between  the 
French  and  the  Americans.  Instead  he  seems  to  have  done  all 
in  his  power  to  intensify  the  mutual  distrust*  at  least  such  was 
the  opinion  of  the  best  citizens.''  He  had  managed  to  hold 
together  that  party  which  had  formerly  regarded  himself,  Murray, 
and  Bentley,  as  leaders  against  Rocheblave ;  and  under  him  this 
party  had  gained  some  accessions.^  Certainly  later  the  clerk  of 
the  court,  Carbonneaux,  became  one  of  his  adherents,  as  did  the 
important  Langlois  family  and  also  Winston's  successor  in  the 
county  lieutenancy,  Timothe  de  Monbreun.  But  the  real  leaders 
of  the  French  inhabitants  were  decidedly  hostile  to  him,  and  he 
counted  among  his  opponents  some  of  those  who  had  ardently 
desired  American  supremacy  and  had  joyfully  welcomed  Clark. 
From  the  sources  of  information  we  can  judge  that  Winston's 
affiliations  were  always  shifting,  and  it  is  difficult  to  find  just  where 
he  stood  at  any  one  time.  That  he  was  jealous  of  the  power 
wielded  by  the  military  is  unquestionable,  but  it  seems  to  have 

1  Kas.  Rec,  Court  Record. 

2  Murray  to  Bentley,  May  25,  1777,  Mich.  Pio.  and  Hist.  Col.,  xix.,  418.  The  date  is 
wrongly  given  as  1779. 

3  Mason  John  Todd  Papers,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  335,  339;  Dr.  MSS.,  50J9. 

*  Memorial  of  Principal  Inhabitants  to  Va.  Commissioners,  Menard  Col.,  Tard  Papers. 
Original  MS.;  Dodge  to  Clark,  March  3,  1783,  Dr.  MSS.,  52J78. 

6  See  supra,  p.  xxxvi. 


INTRODUCTION  Ixxxvii 

been  his  policy  never  to  take  a  decided  stand,  unless  he  was 
compelled  to  do  so  or  saw  that  some  personal  advantage  would 
accrue  thereby.  His  relation  to  Montgomery  was  hostile,  for  the 
two  men  distrusted  each  other;  but  outrageously  as  they  abused 
each  other,  the  French  were  always  firmly  persuaded  that  Winston 
was  betraying  them  to  the  military. 

The  military  situation  in  the  spring  of  the  year  was  a  gloomy 
one;  the  time  of  service  of  most  of  the  troops  had  expred,  and 
there  was  little  chance  of  recruiting  more;  there  was  no  hope  of 
financial  aid  from  Virginia,  and  the  supplies  in  the  villages  of  Illi- 
nois were  exhausted.  It  was  also  known  that  preparations  were 
being  made  by  the  British  for  a  concerted  attack  on  the  western 
posts.  Under  these  circumstances  there  seemed  nothing  for  Clark 
to  do  but  evacuate  the  country,  leaving  a  few  troops  to  keep  up 
the  courage  of  the  French.  He  consulted  with  Todd,  after  a  rapid 
survey  of  the  posts  had  been  made  by  the  latter,  ^  and  they  decided 
to  concentrate  the  few  troops  at  their  disposal  at  a  fort  to  be  built 
at  the  mouth  of  the  Ohio.  The  spot  that  was  finally  chosen,  and 
where  Fort  Jefferson  was  erected,  was  a  place  called  the  Iron 
Mines  south  of  the  river's  mouth.^  All  the  troops  at  Vincennes 
were  recalled  and  commissions  were  sent  to  the  French  to  raise 
a  company  and  take  possession  of  Fort  Patrick  Henry.'  Orders 
were  also  given  to  Montgomery  to  retire  most  of  his  troops  from 
the  villages.  But  before  the  preparations  for  the  evacuation  of 
the  country  could  be  carried  out,  news  came  that  the  British  were 
already  approaching.  This  expedition  was  part  of  a  general 
attack,  planned  by  the  British  on  all  the  Spanish  posts  of  the 
Mississippi  River  in  order  to  prevent  any  assistance's  being  given 
to  the  Americans  by  Spain,  which  had  declared  war  on  England 
the  previous  year.  The  British  troops  from  the  north  and  south 
were  to  move  simultaneously  in  the  spring  of  1780,  and  it  was 
hoped  that  all  the  villages  from  New  Orleans  to  St.  Louis  would 
be  captured.    The  energy  of  Governor  Galvez  of  New  Orleans 

1  Todd  to  Clark  from  Vincennes,  March  lo,  Dr.  MSS.,  60J80. 

2  The  letters  of  Clark  and  Todd  are  in  Va.  State  Papers  i.,  338  and  358. 

«  Va.  State  Papers,  i.,  358.  '■ 


Ixxxviii        ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

in  successfully  attacking  the  British  posts  on  the  Gulf  during  the 
fall  of  1779  and  the  spring  of  the  next  year  frustrated  the  southern 
plan;  but  the  expedition  of  the  north  against  St.  Louis  and 
the  villages  held  by  Clark  was  made  ready,  and  in  the  spring  of 
1780  was  under  way.^  The  British  had  hoped  that  their  move- 
ments were  unknown,  but  during  the  winter  the  Cahokians  had 
noticed  the  activity  of  the  British  agents  among  the  Indians,  and 
by  the  beginning  of  April  they  had  been  warned  of  the  approach- 
ing enemy.  On  the  eleventh  of  that  month  they  sent  Charles 
Gratiot  to  Clark,  who  was  at  the  time  building  Fort  Jefferson,  to 
ask  his  assistance.  At  the  same  time  the  Spanish  commandant 
and  Montgomery  wrote  him  news  of  the  approaching  danger. ^ 
Montgomery  hastened  to  Cahokia,  where  he  was  immediately 
joined  by  Clark  just  in  time  to  repel  the  attack.  The  Spaniards 
were  equally  successful  at  St.  Louis.  Clark  would  have  given 
them  assistance,  had  not  the  strong  winds  prevented  the  signals 
from  being  heard. ^ 

Throughout  the  summer  of  1780  the  people  were  continually 
alarmed  by  accounts  of  Indian  attacks  and  rumors  of  others. 
Fort  Jefferson  underwent  a  severe  siege  ;*  the  people  of  Kaskaskia 
repulsed  a  large  band  of  Indians  on  the  17th  of  July;^  and  the 
inhabitants  of  Cahokia  made  common  cause  with  the  Spaniards 
to  defend  themselves  against  an  expected  attack  the  following 
month.  ^  Thus  at  a  time  when  Clark's  position  was  desperate  the 
French  inhabitants  gave  him  signal  aid,  without  which  the 
Illinois  would  have  been  lost.  It  was  with  a  company  of  300 
French,  Spaniards,  and  Americans  that  Montgomery  marched 
northward  to  make  reprisals  against  the  Indians  around  Rock 
River,  and,  if  we  are  to  believe  the  Frenchmen,  the  failure  of  that 

1  Mich.  Pio.  and  Hist.  Col.,  ix.,  544;  Can.  Archives,  B.,  43,  p.  153;  this  vol.,  p.  531,  539; 
Gayarre  Hist,  of  Louisiana,  iii.,  126  et  seq,]  Hart.  Amer.  Nation,  ix.,  285. 

2  Mason,  John  Todd  Papers,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  354;    post,  p.  531. 

3  The  most  important  documents  of  the  Hald.  Col.  in  regard  to  this  attack  have  been 
printed  in  Mo.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  ii..  No.  6. 

<  Sec  post,  p.  619. 

fi  Va.  State  Papers,  i.,  368;   Can.  Archives,  B.,  10©,  p.  430. 

^  See  post,  p.  59,  61. 


INTRODUCTION  Ixxxix 

expedition  was  due  to  Montgomery's  incompetence.^  Meanwhile 
Clark  led  the  expedition  against  the  Shawnees,  an  expedition 
which  might  have  been  more  successful  had  not  a  series  of  events, 
beginning  at  Vincennes,  led  to  a  further  estrangement  between 
the  French  aild  Americans  and  induced  the  French  at  Vincennes 
to  give  the  Indians  information  of  the  movements  of  the  Ameri- 
cans.^ 

These  events  are  connected  wijth  the  western  career  of  a  French 
officer,  Augustin  Mottin  de  la  Balme.  His  presence  in  the  lUinois 
may,  probably,  be  attributed  to  a  project  conceived  by  Washing- 
ton and  approved  by  Lafayette  and  the  French  minister,  Luzerne, 
for  arousing  the  Canadians  to  unite  their  interests  with  those  of 
the  Americans  and  French  in  an  effort  to  win  independence.  In 
this  way  Washington  hoped  to  conceal  his  real  intentions  of  attack- 
ing New  York  as  soon  as  the  expected  French  fleet  and  soldiers 
arrived,  and  at  the  same  time  compel  the  withdrawal  of  part  of 
the  British  forces  to  Canada.^ 

^  See  post,  p.  541. 

2Bentley  to  Clark,  July  30,  1780,  Dr.  MSS.,  soJsi;  also  post,  617. 

3  This  hjT)othesis  is  based  on  the  identity  of  time  and  action  of  the  De  la  Balme  expedi- 
tion with  the  time  and  purpose  of  Washington's  plan.  There  is  no  other  indication  of  a 
connection  between  them.  Washington  wrote  to  Lafayette  on  May  19,  1780,  about  a  pro- 
clamation which  it  had  been  decided  some  time  before  that  Lafayette  should  write  to  incite 
the  Canadians  to  rise  against  the  British;  and  on  June  4th  he  wrote  to  Arnold  telling  him 
to  have  the  proclamation  printed,  which  was  done.     (Sparks,  Washington,  vii.,  44  and  72.) 

On  March  5th  of  the  same  year  De  la  Balme  wrote  to  Washington  for  a  general  letter  of 
introduction,  as  he  was  intending  to  travel  in  a  short  time  to  the  ' '  Southern  States  of  America" 
where  he  might  be  confounded  with  the  many  adventurers.  {Washington  Papers,  Lib.  of 
Cong.)  By  April  24th  he  had  changed  his  mind  and  it  was  known  that  he  was  thinking  of 
going  to  the  Illinois,  for  a  Mr.  Barriere  writes  him  on  that  date  a  letter  in  which  he  mentions 
that  purpose.  {Can.  Archives,  B .,  184,  vol.  2,  p.  417.)  On  June  27th  De  la  Balme  was  at  Fort 
Pitt  treating  with  the  Indians;  in  tliis  he  was  associated  with  Godfrey  Linctot,  a  Virginian 
Indian  agent.  His  success  was  reported  to  Luzerne,  French  minister  to  Congress.  {Can. 
Archives,  B.,  181,  p.  371.  There  is  a  good  calendar  of  this  report  in  Can.  Archives  for  1888 
p.  865.)  His  acts  at  Fort  Pitt  and  later  in  the  Illinois,  as  narrated  in  the  text,  show  that  he 
was  working  in  the  interests  of  the  alliance  between  the  United  States  and  France.  That  he 
was  not  sent  to  the  West  solely  in  the  interests  of  the  latter  country,  as  has  been  suspected, 
(Turner,  Amer.  Hist.  Rev.  vol.  x..  No.  2,  p.  255,  note  2.)  is  further  proved  by  the  fact  that 
the  French  despatches  of  the  time  show  that  the  French  government  expected  that  the  terri- 
tory north  of  the  Ohio  River  would  be  conceded  to  the  states  by  a  future  treaty.  (See  Views 
of  the  Government  of  the  King,  and  Vergennes  to  Luzerne  September  25, 1779.  Doniol, 
Histoire  de  la  Porticipation  de  la  France,  iv.,  224  and  360.)  The  opposition  which  De  la  Balme 
showed  to  the  Virginians  is  explained  by  the  conditions  he  found  in  Illinois  as  narrated  in 
the  text.  He  was  in  no  way  responsible  for  the  interpretation  of  his  actions  by  Bentley, 
Winston,  and  McCarty,  who  reported  that  he  was  hostile  to  the  Americans  (See  Dr.  MSS., 
5oJsi;  Va.. State  Papers,  i.,  381;  this  vol.,  p. 617);  nor  altogether  for  the  misconceptions  of  the 
French.  (This  vol.,  p.  551;  Can.  Archives,  B.,  184  vol.  2,  pp.  421,  442.)  The  only  fact  that  is  at 
all  suspicious  is  the  manifesto  to  the  Canadians,  found  among  De  la  Balme's  papers,  in  which 
there  is  no  mention  of  the  United  States.  {Can.  Archives,  B.,  184,  vol.  2,  p.  498.);  but  this 
may  have  been  due  to  the  feeling  of  antagonism  among  the  French  against  the  Virginians. 


xc  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

De  la  Balme  had  come  to  America,  highly  recommended  by 
Franklin  and  Silas  Deane,  to  offer  his  sword  to  the  cause  of  the 
colonies.^  He  was  commissioned  inspector  general  of  cavalry  by 
Congress  in  July,  1777,  but  feeling  himself  slighted  in  not  being 
appointed  to  the  command  of  that  division  of  the  army,  he  had 
resigned  on  October  3d  of  the  same  year.  He  remained  in  this 
country,  however,  and  established  himself  in  business  at  Philadel- 
phia.^ Late  in  the  spring  of  the  year  1780,  he  was  sent  West  to 
start  a  movement  among  the  French  of  Illinois  which  it  was 
hoped  would  spread  over  Canada. 

On  the  27th  of  June  he  was  at  Fort  Pitt,  where  he  joined  God- 
frey Linctot  in  his  efforts  to  win  the  Indians  to  the  cause  of  the 
allies,  France,  Spain,  and  the  United  States;  but  he  found  the 
conditions  there  less  favorable  for  his  mission  than  he  had  ex- 
pected, on  account  of  the  hostility  of  the  Indians  to  the  Ameri- 
cans.^ On  reaching  Vincennes  in  July  he  realized  that  the 
presence  of  the  Virginians,  who  had  made  themselves  so  obnoxious 
to  the  French,  was  a  hindrance  to  his  plan,  for  no  campaign  in 
which  the  Virginians  were  to  join  could  be  promoted. 

On  the  other  hand  the  part  of  De  la  Balme's  program  in  regard 
to  assistance  from  France  was  most  eagerly  received,  and  the 
emotional  French  were  soon  saying  that  their  beloved  father,  the 
king  of  France,  was  to  take  control  of  the  West  again.  It  was  this 
message  that  they  gave  to  the  Indians,  who  still  retained  their  old 
affection  for  their  allies.  In  Kaskaskia  the  message  was  received 
in  the  same  way.  De  la  Balme  came  with  a  letter  of  recommenda- 
tion from  Alexander  Fowler,  a  former  British  officer  of  the  village 

On  the  other  hand  there  was  in  the  manifesto  no  intimation  that  France  was  intending  to 
recover  her  dominion  over  Canada. 

On  account  of  the  betrayal  by  Arnold,  or  for  some  other  reason,  Washington  changed  his 
plans  and  gave  no  further  attention  to  arousing  the  Canadians.  (Sparks,  Washington,  vii., 
44,  note.) 

Previous  to  the  arrival  of  De  la  Balme,  on  May  lo,  1780,  another  French  agent,  Jean  de 
St.  Germain,  was  at  Kaskaskia.  He  claimed  to  have  come  directly  from  France  and  to  be 
acquainted  with  the  desires  of  the  king.  He  united  with  John  Montgomery  and  Richard 
Winston  in  a  proclamation  to  the  Indians,  in  which  they  were  assured  of  the  friendship 
existing  between  the  French,  Spanish,  and  Americans.  (Can.  Archives,  B.,  122,  p.  478). 
Rocheblave  writes  that  St.  Germain  landed  at  Charlestown  the  previous  winter  and  went  to  the 
West  (Ibid,  B.,  122,  p.  545.)     I  have  found  nothing  to  connect  him  with  De  la  Blame. 

1  Can.  Archives,  B.,  184,  vol.  2,  pp.  390  and  381. 

^  Ibid,  pp.  390,  391,  392,  394;   Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xl.,  pp.  144,  168. 

3  Can.  Archives,  B.,  181,  p.  271. 


INTRODUCTION  xci 

who  had  joined  the  American  cause. ^  The  best  citizens  of  French 
origin  in  this  village  and  in  Cahokia  welcomed  him  with  open 
arms,  or  as  Winston  said,  ''just  as  the  Hebrews  would  receive  the 
Masiah."2  He  had  very  little  to  say  to  Montgomery  and  his 
soldiers,  for  his  mission  was  not  to  them,  and  in  the  existing  cir- 
cumstances he  could  not  risk  alienating  the  French  by  assuming 
a  friendship  for  the  Virginians;  nor  did  Montgomery  take  any 
notice  of  his  presence.  The  Spanish  commandant  of  St.  Louis 
seemed  also  far  from  cordial.^  De  la  Balme's  proposed  plan  was 
the  raising  of  a  company  in  the  Illinois  to  occupy  Detroit,  which 
was  known  to  be  ready  to  yield,  and  then  to  proceed  to  Canada, 
where  he  expected  to  be  joined  by  thousands  of  the  inhabitants. 

Considering  the  object  of  his  mission  and  the  conditions 
existing  in  the  French  villages,  his  address  to  the  inhabitants 
proves  his  ability  for  extricating  himself  from  a  difficult  position. 
''It  is  well,"  said  he,  "that  you  know  that  the  troops  of  the  state 
of  Virginia  have  come  here  against  the  wish  of  the  other  states  of 
America,  as  I  learned  from  members  of  Congress  before  my 
departure  from  Philadelphia,  and  that  the  different  deputies  who 
compose  that  body  are  ignorant  of  the  revolting  proceedings  and 
acts  of  violence,  which  the  troops  are  practicing  towards  you  and 
which  are  not  only  blameable  but  condemnable  at  the  tribunal  of 
the  whole  world.  .  .  .  Therefore  it  is  very  important  for  you, 
gentlemen,  on  account  of  the  pressing  circumstances,  that  with- 
out loss  of  time  you  address  yourselves  to  the  minister  of  France 
in  order  to  force  the  state  of  Virginia  to  redeem  the  paper  money, 
the  letters  of  exchange,  and  other  claims,  which  you  have  in  your 
hands,  and  to  recall  from  among  you  the  troops  which  are  op- 
pressing you  contrary  to  all  right,  since  you  espouse  the  cause  of 
the  king  of  France  and  his  allies;  troops  which,  far  from  pre- 
serving you  from  the  fury  of  the  cruel  enemies,  render  you  victims 
of  a  war,  which  the  Indians,  who  have  been  constantly  friends  of 
the  French,  would  never  have  made  without  them."    He  then 

1  Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers.    Copy  by  the  clerk. 

3  Mason,  John  Todd  Papers,  340. 

'Bentley  to  Clark,  July  30,  1780,  Dr.  MSS.,  S0J51;  McCarty's  Journal,  post,  p.  620; 
Dr.  MSS.,  S0J66;   Can.  Archives,  B.,  184,  vol.  2,  p.  468. 


xcii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

urges  them  to  join-  the  expedition  against  Detroit,  "which  will 
win  the  confidence  of  the  honorable  Congress  and  convince  the 
king  of  France  of  the  real  interest  which  you  take  in  a  cause  for 
which  he  has  already  made  great  sacrifices  and  which  will  procure 
for  you  in  a  little  while  all  imaginable  assistance  from  him."^ 
That  De  la  Balme  deceived  the  French  by  promising  them  the 
assistance  and  co-operation  of  the  king  of  France,  and  that  his 
words  led  them  to  believe  that  the  royal  troops  would  soon  be  seen 
again  on  the  banks  of  the  Mississippi  cannot  be  denied ;  but  if  he 
came  in  accordance  with  the  plan  of  Washington  and  Lafayette, 
he  was  following  his  orders  as  far  as  it  was  possible  under  the  very 
perplexing  conditions  which  he  found  in  the  Illinois. 

Although  the  French  received  him  enthusiastically,  their 
power  of  aiding  the  expedition  was  not  great  and  it  was  only  with 
a  handful  of  men,  about  eighty  French  inhabitants  and  Indians,^ 
that  De  la  Balme  started  for  Detroit.  The  standard  which  waved 
over  this  little  company  was  that  of  France.^  He  successfully 
attacked  the  post  at  the  Miami,  but  was  in  turn  defeated  and  killed 
by  the  Indians.''  At  the  time  of  his  departure  for  Detroit  he  had 
sent  a  detachment  from  Cahokia  under  Hamelin  against  St.  Joseph, 
which  succeeded  in  sacking  that  place  but  was  overtaken  by  a 
body  of  merchants  and  Indians  and  defeated.^  Thus  ended  the 
attempt  at  arousing  the  Canadians.  Before  the  arrival  of  De 
la  Balme  in  the  West,  the  policy  of  Washington  and  Luzerne  had 
changed  and  they  left  their  agent  to  effect  what  he  could  alone. 

The  death  of  De  la  Balme  did  not  bring  this  interesting  episode 
in  the  history  of  the  Illinois  to  an  end.  The  villagers  of  Cahokia 
had  suffered  a  severe  loss  at  St.  Joseph,  for  all  the  members  of 
their  expedition  were  either  killed  or  captured  except  three.  The 
Cahokians,  wishing  for  revenge,  hurriedly  raised  a  troop  of  twenty 
men  and  asked  aid  of  the  Spanish  government,  which  throughout 

1  Can.  Archives,  B.,  184,  vol.  2,  p.  434.     Translation  by  the  editor. 

2LeGras  to  Clark,  December  i,  1780,  Dr.  MSS.,  50J75. 

3  Papers  0}  Old  Cong.,  xlviii.,  i;  Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers,  Memorial  of  Kaskaskians, 
to  Governor  of  Virginia. 

*  Can.  Archives,  B.,  100,  p.  486;    Va.  Stale  Papers,  i.,  465. 

5  Mick.  Pio.  and  Hist.  Col.,  xix.,  591;    Va.  State  Papers,  i.,  432. 


INTRODUCTION  xciii 

the  year  had  made  common  cause  with  them  in  repelUng  and  at- 
tacking the  enemy,  and  which  now  sent  thirty  men  to  their  assist- 
ance. With  the  addition  of  two  hundred  Indians^  they  marched 
in  midwinter,  within  a  month  of  their  previous  defeat,  across 
Illinois,  and  in  the  first  days  of  1781  took  and  sacked  St.  Joseph, 
returning  home  immediately.^ 

The  failure  of  De  la  Balme  is  not  of  much  importance  in  our 
narrative,  but  the  effect  of  his  presence  on  the  people  of  the 
Illinois  was  tremendous.  His  appeal  to  them  as  Frenchmen, 
their  awakened  pride  in  the  name,  the  expectation  of  French  inter- 
vention in  their  behalf,  were  all  factors  in  the  events  which  fol- 
lowed. From  this  time  there  is  no  mistaking  their  animosity 
towards  the  Virginians.  Their  eyes  had  been  opened  by  the  harsh 
treatment  of  the  frontiersmen,  but  they  had  submissively  accepted 
their  fate  without  daring  to  do  more  than  petition  their  oppressors. 
On  account  of  the  false  hope  aroused  by  De  la  Balme  they  now 
dared  to  adopt  open  measiures,  for  was  not  their  former  king 

1  McCarty  to  Slaughter,  January  17,  1781,  Va.  State  Papers,  i.,  465. 

2  Mich.  Pio.  and  Hist.  Col.,  xix.,  600.  When  the  expedition  returned  the  Spanish  com- 
mandant at  St.  Louis  sent  a  greatly  exaggerated  account  of  the  campaign  to  the  home  govern- 
ment. In  this  he  said  that  sixty-five  militia  men  from  St.  Louis  had  marched,  under  the 
greatest  difficulties,  across  the  country  and  taken  possession  of  an  important  British  post 
and  all  the  country  north  of  the  Illinois  River  in  the  name  of  the  king.  (The  account  was 
printed  in  the  Madrid  Gazette  of  March  12,  1782,  and  may  be  found  in  Sparks,  Diplomatic 
Correspondence,  iv.,  425.)  This  immediately  aroused  anxiety  in  the  minds  of  the  American 
ministers  in  Europe.  (5ee  ref.  to  Diplom.  Cor.  above  and  Works  of  Franklin,  Bigelow,  ed., 
vii.,  444.)  That  Spain  desired  to  win  the  east  bank  of  the  Mississippi  is  unquestioned  (See 
Doniol,  Hist,  de  la  Paticipation  de  la  France,  iii.,  393  et  seq.),  and  that  she  intended  to  make 
the  utmost  of  this  unimportant  success  at  a  minor  British  post  is  plain,  but  the  motive  for  the 
expedition  came  from  Cahokia  and  in  assisting  his  neighbors  in  expeditions  on  the  eastern 
bank,  as  in  this  case,  the  Spanish  commandant  was  doing  no  more  than  he  had  done  at  least 
twice  before  within  the  past  year.  In  taking  possession  of  the  territory  north  of  the  Illinois 
River,  he  was  not  encroaching  upon  the  region  occupied  by  the  Virginians  any  more  than  did 
Galvez  when  he  captured  Mobile  and  Pensacola,  for  the  Umits  of  the  county  of  Ilhnois 
extended  only  to  the  Illinois  River. 

The  best  account,  because  unbiased  and  given  in  an  incidental  way,  is  that  of  McCarty, 
who  in  writing  the  news  of  Cahokia,  where  he  was,  states  the  facts  as  I  have  given  them  above. 
Historians  have,  however,  followed  exclusively  the  Spanish  account  and  have  made  more 
of  the  episode  than  it  was  worth,  for  its  only  importance  was  the  use  Spain  may  have  made 
of  it  in  her  diplomacy,  provided  there  is  any  basis  for  that  suspicion.  The  rnost  extended 
account  based  on  the  Spanish  report  will  be  found  in  Mason,  Chapters  from  Illinois  History, 
vi.,  743;   see  also  Winsor,  Westward  Movement,  189;   Hart,  Amer.  Nation,  ix.,  286. 

It  is  worth  noticing  that  the  story  of  the  defeat  of  the  Cahokians  at  the  time  of  the  De  la 
Balme  expedition  and  the  subsequent  victory  with  the  assistance  of  the  Spaniards  was  heard 
by  John  Reynolds  from  the  village  people,  but  the  date  of  the  two  had  been  transferred  to 
an  earlier  time,  namely  1777  and  1778.  The  honor  of  the  victory  of  the  second  attack,  which, 
also,  according  to  tradition  was  for  revenge,  was  popularly  ascribed  to  J.  Bte.  Mailhet  of  Peo- 
ria (Reynolds  wrongly  says  Paulette)  who  must  have  been  at  Cahokia  at  the  time,  since  the 
Peorians  had  been  driven  out  of  their  \'illage  by  the  numerous  British  and  Indian  attacks 
in  the  previous  summer.  The  facts  of  this  tradition  support  McCarty's  testimony.  (Rey- 
nolds, Pioneer  History.)  Strangely  enough  Mason  {Chapters  from  Illinois  History,  275) 
accepted  the  date  given  by  Reynolds  and  wrote  an  account  of  French  attacks  on  British  posts 
before  the  arrival  of  Clark. 


xciv  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

interested  in  the  fate  of  his  distant  and  faithful  followers  ?  The 
citizens  of  all  the  villages  united  in  a  memorial  to  the  governor  of 
Virginia,  in  which  they  wrote  that  they  had  decided  not  to  re- 
ceive any  more  troops  in  their  villages,  except  those  which  should 
be  sent  by  the  king  of  France ;  the  presence  of  the  Virginians  had 
brought  them  into  war  with  the  Indians  who  before  had  been 
friendly  and  they  had  suffered  therefrom ;  they  promised,  however, 
to  guard  the  frontiers  of  Virginia  from  attacks  by  the  Indians.^ 
In  each  of  the  villages  memorials  were  also  drawn  up  to  be  sent  to 
the  French  minister,  Luzerne,  in  which  were  set  forth  with  great 
detail  the  grievances  which  the  inhabitants  had  suffered  at  the 
hands  of  the  Virginians.  These  petitions,  however,  never  reached 
their  destination,  since  they  fell  into  the  hands  of  the  British  with 
the  other  papers  of  De  la  Balme.^ 

The  best  account  of  the  changed  attitude  of  the  French  is  found 
in  McCarty's  journal.  In  the  summer  of  1780,  he  had  been 
summoned  with  his  troops  to  Fort  Jefferson  to  give  aid  against  a 
party  of  British  and  Indians  attacking  it.  On  his  return  to  Kas- 
kaskia  early  in  August  he  found  that  De  la  Balme  had  been  in 
the  village  and  that,  "the  people  in  General  seem  to  be  Changed 
towards  us  and  Many  things  Said  unfitting,"  and  again,  "as 
things  are  now  the  people  in  General  are  allienated  and  Changed 
from  us."^  The  short  lived  hope  of  the  French  did  them  little 
good.  For  a  moment  they  were  able  to  raise  their  heads  like 
men,  but  with  the  defeat  and  death  of  their  leader  their  hope 
was  dashed  to  the  ground  and  the  weary  wait  for  other  means  of 
relief  began  again;  for,  oppressed  by  the  military  and  hearing 
nothing  from  Todd,  they  could  only  conclude  that  Virginia  had 
withdrawn  her  support  and  that  they  were  left  to  do  for  them- 
selves until  some  other  power  should  take  them  under  its  pro- 
tection."* 

1  Can.  Archives,  B.,  184,  vol.  2,  p.  506. 

2  The  memorial  from  Cahokiais  printed  in  this  vol.,  p.  535;  for  that  from  Vincennes  see 
Can.  Archives,  B.,  184,  vol.  12,  p.  421.  The  petition  from  Kaskaskia,  which  would  have  been 
particularly  valuable  for  the  history  of  Clark's  occupation  of  the  village  is  not  calendared  in 
the  Hald.  Col.  and  has  probably  been  lost.  A  very  brief  memorial  to  Luzerne  was  sent  by 
the  Kaskaskians  after  the  death  of  De  la  Balme  and  a  copy  of  it  is  in  the  Menard  Col.,  Tard. 
Papers. 

3 See  post,  p.  620. 

*  Va.  State  Papers,  i.,  382. 


INTRODUCTION  xcv 

During  the  fall  the  Americans  carried  out  the  plan  which 
they  had  detertnined  upon  before  the  attack  of  the  British  and 
which  subsequent  events  had  postponed,  namely,  the  partial 
evacuation  of  Illinois.  At  the  time  of  the  attack  on  Fort  Jefferson 
the  troops  had  been  recalled  from  Vincennes.  Montgomery 
after  his  return  from  the  relief  of  the  fort  remained  some  time  in 
Kaskaskia  and  on  October  i8th^  went  down  the  river  to  New 
Orleans,  leaving  a  bad  name  behind  him,  even  among  the  Ameri- 
cans, on  account  of  his  extravagance  and  dishonesty.  He  did 
not  add  to  his  reputation  by  deserting  his  wife  for  "an  infamous 
girl"  whom  he  took  with  him.^ 

Captain  Rogers,  who  was  left  by  Montgomery  in  command  of 
the  few  remaining  troops  at  Kaskaskia,^  was  to  prove  himself 
a  worse  tyrant  to  the  French  than  his  predecessor  had  been.  Two 
other  men  had  appeared  in  the  Illinois  in  the  spring  or  summer 
of  this  year  whose  names  were  also  to  become  execrated,  John 
Dodge  and  Thomas  Bentley.  John  Dodge  was  born  in  Connec- 
ticut, had  become  a  trader  at  Sandusky  before  the  outbreak  of 
the  Revolution,  and,  since  he  showed  his  attachment  to  the 
cause  of  the  colonists,  was  arrested  by  the  British,  who  carried 
him  to  Detroit  and  later  to  Quebec,  whence  he  escaped  in  1779.* 
In  that  year  Washington  recommended  him  to  Congress  as  a  man 
who  would  be  useful  in  the  West.  He  went  to  Virginia,  won  the 
friendship  of  Jefferson,  and  was  appointed  Indian  agent.* 

^  General  Orders  of  Montgomery,  Dr.  MSS.,  50J70. 

2  Mason,  John  Todd  Papers,  335.  Montgomery's  defence  of  his  actions  may  be  found  in 
Mason,  John  Todd  Papers,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  351  et  seq.  On  April  23,  1782,  he 
wrote  a  letter  of  justification  to  George  Webb,  in  which  he  said:  "Had  I  made  a  fort  on  in  the 
time  people  mout  had  Reason  to  Suspected  me  But  to  the  Contreary  I  have  spent  one  or  at  least 
my  all  But  am  in  hopes  to  Be  Eable  to  Live  a  poor  and  privet  Life  after  wards  it  is  now  almost 
fore  years  That  I  have  not  Receive  a  shilling  from  Government  Not  Withstanding  I  advanced 
Every  Shilling  I  had  &  straned  my  Credit  till  it  Became  Shred  Bear  Rather  than  draw 
Bills  on  the  State."     Copy  from  Va.  State  Lib. 

Montgomery  was  born  in  Botetourt  county,  Va.,  about  1742.  His  use  of  English  shows 
that  his  education  was  hmited.  He  was  one  of  the  celebrated  party  of  "long  hunters"  in 
1771-  His  experience  in  Indian  warfare  had  fitted  him  for  such  an  undertaking  as  that  by 
Clark  against  the  Illinois.  He  was  killed  by  the  Indians  in  Kentucky  in  1794.  (English, 
Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  {.,  137.) 

3  Letter  of  Winston,  Dr.  MSS.,  50J71. 

*  Woodward,  Dodge  Genealogy;  Dr.  Notes,  Trip  i860,  11J1S3;  Dodge's  wcmwtc/ to 
Cong.,  January  25,  17791  Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xli.,  2,  441. 

6  Dr.  MSS.,  46JS2  and  29J36.  Dodge  was  one  of  the  refugees  from  Canada  and  Nova 
Scotia  who  received  compensation  in  land  for  their  losses  during  the  Revolutionary  War. 
He  must  have  died  before  1800,  since  his  heirs  were  granted  1280  acres  of  land  in  that  year. 


xcvi  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

The  second,  Thomas  Bentley,  had  been  well  known  in  the 
village  at  an  earlier  period.  On  an  accusation  made  by  Roche- 
blave  of  intriguing  with  the  Americans  he  had  been  arrested  and 
sent  to  Quebec,  where  he  remained  until  the  spring  of  1780, 
when  he  made  his  escape.^  He  had  asserted  his  innocence  in 
several  persuasive  memorials  and  had  convinced  even  Governor 
Haldimand  of  his  good  faith.  As  a  further  evidence  of  his 
allegiance  to  England  he  went  to  Virginia  and  by  his  intercession 
for  British  prisoners  with  the  government  gained  for  Governor 
Hamilton  some  mitigation  to  the  harshness  of  his  captivity  and 
for  Judge  Dejean  of  Detroit,  release  on  parole.^  Bentley's  double 
dealing  at  this  time  is  evident  from  his  letters  to  the  Americans  and 
to  the  British.  While  he  was  writing  to  Clark  concerning  the 
activities  of  De  la  Balme  and  wishing  the  Americans  success  in 
their  attack  on  the  Indians,  he  was  writing  to  the  British  officers 
that  Illinois  could  be  easily  captured  by  a  few  hundred  soldiers.^ 
In  his  deceit  he  was  eminently  successful,  for  Clark  later  wrote 
him  a  certificate  of  good  character,  in  which  he  asserted  that  the 
latter  had  given  great  assistance  to  the  cause ;"  and  the  Governor 
of  Canada  was  so  persuaded  of  his  honest  motives  that  he  thought 
it  would  be  wise  to  allow  Bentley  to  remain  quietly  in  the  IlHnois, 
as  he  would  be  of  great  use  there.  On  his  return  to  Illinois, 
Bentley  was  firmly  resolved  to  make  the  French  pay  for  his  cap- 
tivity, for  he  beheved  that  they  had  all  been  in  a  plot  with 
Rocheblave  against  him. 

The  operations  of  Bentley  and  Dodge,  who  formed  a  partner- 
ship for  making  the  most  out  of  the  situation,  began  while  Mont- 
gomery, who  gave  them  countenance,  commanded  in  the  Ilhnois. 
They  bought  up  the  claims  of  the  inhabitants  against  Virginia 
for  trifling  sums,  in  doing  which  it  was  suspected  that  they  made 

Amer.  Slate  Papers,  Pub.  Lands,  i.,  io6.  There  are  in  existence  two  memorials  to  Congress 
narrating  his  earlier  misfortunes.  Washington  Papers,  xciii.,  35;  Papers  of  Old  Congress, 
xli.,  2,  441. 

1  See  supra,  p.  xxxv.,  n.,  2. 

2  Bentley  to  De  Peyster  July  28,  1780,  Mich.  Pio.  and  Hist.  Col,  xix.,  598. 

3  His  most  important  letters  are  printed  in  Mich.  Pio.  and  Hist.  Col.,  xix.  548,  560.  For 
his  letter  to  Clark  see  Dr.  MSS.,  50J51;   Can.  Archives,  B.,  185,  vol.  i,  58,  62. 

*  Va.  State  Papers,  ii.,  153. 


INTRODUCTION  xcvii 

use  of  public  funds,  and  their  financial  operations  in  purchasing 
supplies  for  the  troops  also  aroused  suspicion.  Such  conduct 
called  forth  a  characteristic  letter  from  McCarty  to  Todd.  As 
McCarty  was  feeling  at  the  time  particularly  angry  with  the 
officers  of  the  Virginia  line,  because  he  had  been  arrested  by 
Montgomery  for  bringing  an  accusation  against  Dodge, ^  his 
testimony  cannot  be  taken  without  reserve;  but  that  there  was 
some  truth  in  what  he  wrote  is  abundantly  proved  by  letters  from 
Clark  and  others.  The  letter  shows  not  only  the  situation  brought 
about  by  the  dealings  of  the  two  financiers  but  also  the  continued 
exactions  of  the  troops  and  the  effects  of  the  visit  of  De  la  Balme. 
It  is  addressed  to  Todd.  "When  shall  I  begin  to  appolagize 
for  the  Different  light  and  Oppinion,  I  saw  and  had  of  You  when 
hear  last  Year,  and  now.  the  Spirit  of  a  free  subject  that  you 
inculcated  thro'  your  better  knowledge  of  things  was  hid  to  me. 
In  short,  Honour  requires  me  to  render  You  the  Justice  you  de- 
sarve,  and  at  the  same  time  to  inform  you  the  reason  of  my  altering 
my  notions  of  things.  I  then  thought  the  Troops  hear  would  be 
duly  supported  by  the  State,  and  the  legal  expense  for  them 
paid  to  the  people  Justly.  I  had  thought  the  Duty  of  an  Officer 
who  had  any  Command  was  to  see  Justice  done  his  Soldiers,  and 
that  they  had  their  Rights  without  wronging  his  Country.  I 
then  thought  that  it  was  also  his  Duty  to  fore  see  and  use  all 
manner  of  occonomie  in  Laying  up  provisions  for  these  Soldiers, 
to  carry  on  any  Opperation  that  his  supperiours  should  judge 
expedient  to  order  him  on,  without  any  regard  to  private  interests 
whatever,  but  for  the  Good  of  the  State  he  served.  I  then  never 
Imagined  that  an  Agent  would  be  sent  hear  to  Trade  in  connec- 
tion with  a  Private  Person  to  Purchase  the  Certificates  from  the 
people  at  such  a  rate  which  must  appear  scandalous  &  Dis- 
honorable to  the  State. 

"To  the  contrary  of  all  which  I  am  now  convinced  by  occular 

'  Demonstration:    in  short  we  are  become  the  Hated  Beasts  of  a 

whole  people  by  Pressing  horses.  Boats   &lc   &c,  KiUing  cattle, 

&c  &c,  for  which  no  valuable  consideration  is  given :  even  many 

1  See  post,  p.  621.     For  the  charge  that  public  funds  were  illegally  used,  see  Post,  p.  481. 


xcviii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

not  a  certificate  which  is  hear  looked  on  as  next  to  nothing."^ 
McCarty  by  this  letter  gave  warning  of  his  change  of  party  alle- 
giance. He  had  up  to  this  time  sided  with  the  military  against 
the  civil  authority  and  the  French.  From  now  on  he  attempted 
to  win  the  confidence  of  the  latter,  in  the  oppression  of  whom  he 
had  formerly  taken  active  part.  Both  he  and  Winston  advised 
the  people  to  refuse  all  supplies  to  the  troops  and  starve  them 
out  of  the  country.  For  this  reason  Winston  also  found  his 
relations  with  the  military  even  more  strained  than  under  the  rule 
of  Montgomery.  He  wrote  to  Todd  that:  "They  Stretch  greatly 
to  bring  the  Country  under  the  military  rod  and  throw  of  the  Civil 
Authority.  So  fond  they  are  to  be  medling  with  what  is  not 
within  their  Power.  .  .  .  Since  the  arrival  of  this  Captain  Bentley, 
there  has  been  nothing  Butt  discord  and  disunion  in  this  place.  .  . 
he  has  left  no  stone  unturned  to  Extinguish  the  laws  of  the  State, 
and  to  revive  the  Heathen  Law,  being  well  accustomed  to  Bribes 
and  Entertainments.  Government  ought  to  regulate  the  trade 
as  there  are  many  abuses  Committed  under  Military  sanction."^ 
It  is  unnecessary  to  give  the  details  of  the  trying  winter  of 
1780-1781,  for  it  was  but  a  repetition  of  the  previous  one.  The 
inhabitants  wrote  that  the  government  was  like  that  of  a  town 
taken  by  assault.  Captain  Rogers,  who  was  young  and  inex- 
perienced, was  bHnded  by  the  advice  of  the  crafty  Dodge  and 
Bentley.^  That  the  means  they  used  to  obtain  provisions  were 
cruel  is  proved  by  the  piteous  appeals  of  the  inhabitants  to  the 
governor.  That  their  methods  were  not  always  honest  was 
firmly  believed  by  many  officers  and  by  Clark  himself.  Captain 
Robert  George  in  writing  to  Clark  on  October  24th  after 
mentioning  the  almost  starving  condition  of  the  troops,  says 
that  Montgomery  told  him  that,  "  Capt.  Dodge  has  purchased  one 
Thousand  bushells  of  corn  and  Ten  Thousand  Ib^  of  Flour,  which 
is  all  that  is  to  show  from  a  cargoe  of  Eleven  Thousand  hard 
dollars  worth  of  Goods  sent  by  Mr  Pollock  to  You,  together  with 

1  Va.  State  Papers,  i.,  379. 

2  Winston  to  Todd,  October  24,  1780,  Va.  State  Papers,  i.,  380. 

3  The  court  showed  more  spirit  in  opposing  the  soldiers.    There  are  several  interesting 
letters  in  regard  to  their  exactions  in  the  Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers. 


INTRODUCTION  xcix 

about  five  or  six  thousand  Dollars  worth  from  this  place.  .  .  . 
I  have  sent  for  all  the  State  Horses  at  Kaskaskia,  but  it  appears 
there  is  but  few  —  what's  gone  with  them  God  knows,  but  I  be- 
lieve there  will  be  a  Very  disagreeable  accompt  rendered  to  you 
of  them  as  well  as  many  other  things  when  called  for."^  In 
March,  1781,  Clark  was  thoroughly  aroused  by  the  complaints  of 
the  administration  of  the  finances  in  his  department, and  in  writing 
to  Jefferson  says :  ''I  Received  your  dispatches  by  Capt.  Sullivan. 
That  part  concerning  the  Bills  count er^^  by  Maj.  Slaughter,  and 
letters  of  advice,  is  something  curious.  It's  surprising  to  me  that 
Maj.  Slaughter,  as  an  Officer  of  the  State,  would  suffer  these 
persons  to  persevear  in  their  villany,  was  he  as  he  hints  truly 
sensible  of  the  principal  that  actuated  them.  You  know  my 
Sentiments  Respecting  sev^^  persons  in  our  Imploy.  Those  he 
accuses,  are  gen^^  men  of  fair  Character.  I  have  long  since 
determined  to  conduct  myself  with  a  particular  Rigour  towards 
every  person  under  me.  They  shall  feel  the  stings  of  Remorse, 
if  capable,  or  the  sweets  of  public  applause,  either  as  they  demean 
themselves.  .  .  .  Those  gentlemen  Major  Slaughter  points  at, 
with  himself,  may  expect  to  undergo  the  strictest  scrutiny  in  a 
short  time,  as  Orders  are  prepared  for  that  Purpose.  Mr.  Jno. 
Dodge  &  others,  of  the  Illinois,  also.'" 

While  the  officers  were  using  their  positions  for  private  gain 
and  reducing  to  abject  poverty  the  French  by  their  levies,  the 
troops  of  Virginia  were  suffering  the  severest  hardships.  In 
August,  1781,  Colonel  Slaughter  wrote  from  the  Falls  of  the  Ohio: 
"The  situation  of  my  little  Corps  at  this  place  at  present  is  truly 
deplorable,  destitute  of  clothing,  vituals  &  money,  the  Com- 
missaries have  furnished  them  with  little  or  no  provisions  these 
three  months  past  nor  dont  give  themselves  the  least  concern 
about  it."  Montgomery  wrote  that  at  Fort  Jefferson  there  was 
not  a  mouthful  for  the  troops  to  eat,  nor  money  to  purchase  any, 
and  that  the  credit  of  the  government   was  threadbare.     On 

^  Va.  State  Papers,  i.,  382.  For  other  evidence  of  dishonesty  see  Slaughter's  letter,  January 
17,  1781,  Va.  State  Papers,  i.,  440.  Jefferson  was  convinced  of  Dodge's  dishonesty,  Dr.  MSS., 
S1J17.  In  the  petitions  of  the  Cahokians  to  Virginia  it  is  stated  that  public  supplies  were 
used  to  buy  in  the  drafts  and  other  forms  of  credit,  see  this  vol.,  p.  481. 

2  Va.  State  Papers,  i.,  597. 


c  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

August  6,  1 781,  Captain  Bailey  wrote  from  Vincennes:  "My 
men  have  been  15  days  upon  half  allowance;  there  is  plenty  of 
provisions  here  but  no  credit.  I  cannot  press,  being  the  weakest 
party.  "^ 

The  contest  of  Rogers,  Dodge,  and  Bentley  with  the  court  was 
brought  to  a  crisis  at  the  end  of  January  by  the  acts  of  the  last. 
Bentley  was  inspired  by  his  desire  for  revenge,  and  his  malice  is 
shown  by  a  long  letter  which  he  addressed  to,  "The  inhabitants 
particularly  those  who  are  not  my  friends,"  wherein  he  sets 
forth  his  grievances  at  length.  There  was  little  that  he  could 
say  by  way  of  accusation,  so  he  had  recourse  to  abusive  language. 
The  letter  is  too  long  to  quote,  but  a  few  extracts  will  give  an  idea 
of  its  character.  "I  know  that  most  of  you  are  mortified  at  see- 
ing me  succeed  in  surmounting  the  difficulties  with  which  you 
together  with  that  rascal  Rocheblave,  Cerre,  and  others  have 
burdened  me.  I  am  persuaded  that  there  is  not  one  among  you 
in  this  village  who  did  not  wish  to  crush  me  under  the  weight  of 
my  misfortunes.  I  know  that  it  is  a  crime  for  a  damned  English- 
man to  remain  among  you.  The  Irish  suit  you  better.  They 
are  your  equals  in  perfidy,  lying,  flattering,  and  drinking  tafia. 
....  Some  infamous  vagabonds  have  had  the  audacity  to 
demand  an  inspection  of  my  books.  Nothing  but  ignorance 
without  parallel,  joined  with  the  most  complete  Irish  imperti- 
nence could  have  thought  of  that.  A  man  of  the  least  honor 
would  not  have  conceived  such  an  idea. 

"I  am  informed  that  the  cause  for  which  you  came  was  con- 
cerning some  tafia  given  to  the  negroes.  On  this  subject  I  satisfy 
you  on  the  honor  of  a  man  of  integrity  that  it  was  not  from  me 
that  they  had  it 

"I  am  informed  that  Lachance  and  Brazeau  are  getting 
together  all  the  corn  for  M.  Cerre.  Why  should  not  I  have  the 
same  liberty;  since  perhaps  I  should  give  better  merchandize  and 
at  a  better  bargain.  The  reason  is  that  M.  Cerr^,  concerning 
whom  I  will  prove  some  day  that  he  is  a  man  without  moral 
feeling,  is  a  Frenchman  and  I  am  a  damned  Englishman." 

1  These  letters  are  printed  in  Va.  State  Papers,  ii.,  306,  313,  338. 


INTRODUCTION  ci 

A  suit  brought  by  Bentley  against  Richard  McCarty  and 
Michel  Perrault  was  begun  in  the  court  of  November,  1780;  but 
the  court  refused  Bentley  any  recognition  until  he  had  taken  the 
oath  of  fidelity  to  the  United  States  and  Virginia.  In  the  January 
court  Bentley  appeared  with  two  Americans  and  said  he  was 
ready  to  take  the  oath.  This  the  justices  tendered  him  in  the 
French  language,  which  both  he  and  his  companions  understood ; 
but  Bentley  refused  to  take  it,  claiming  that  it  was  the  oath  of 
office  that  they  were  offering  him.  He  immediately  left  the 
court  and  soon  after  returned  saying  that  he  had  made  oath 
before  Captain  Rogers,  The  court,  however,  stood  firm  in  re- 
gard to  its  rights. 

Rogers  took  up  the  matter  and  wrote  to  the  court  that  he  was 
surprised  at  their  audacity  in  not  recognizing  his  certificate  given 
to  Bentley.  "It  seems  to  me  that  Mr.  Bentley  has  the  same 
right  to  justice  as  you  yourselves  and  you  can  be  assured  that  I 
can  give  reasons  and  proofs  to  impartial  justices  of  his  conduct 
which  will  make  him  appear  perhaps  a  better  friend  of  the  state 
than  you,  since  your  court  appears  to  be  one  for  injustice  and 
not  for  justice.  And  should  you  dare  to  refuse  my  certificate 
in  the  case  of  the  oath  of  fidelity,  I  will  take  it  on  myself  to  set 
your  court  aside  and  become  responsible  for  the  consequences. 
You  have  only  to  consider  and  render  justice  or  I  will  do  what 
is  mentioned  above." 

The  court  was  not  frightened  into  submissiveness,  but  an- 
swered: *'We  have  received  your  letter  of  to-day  in  which  you 
give  us  over  your  signature  the  most  complete  mark  of  your 
capacity  in  the  trust  which  you  imagine  you  hold. 

"We  do  not  doubt  the  desire  on  your  part  to  make  yourself 
absolute  master;  but  we  have  acts  of  the  legislative  power  of  the 
state  of  Virginia  to  govern  us  and  to  which  we  believe  we  are 
bound  to  conform,  even  as  you  are  yourself,  when  we  require  your 
assistance. 

"As  to  the  injustice  with  which  you  charge  us,  there  will, 

I  perhaps,  come  a  more  happy  day  when  we  shall  prove  our  good 
faith,  which  is  always  the  only  motive  which  leads  honorable  men. ' 


cii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Possibly  Bentley  realized  the  weakness  of  Rogers  threat,  for 
he  now  drew  up  a  protest  against  the  action  of  the  court  in  which 
he  appealed  to  Virginia.  In  the  February  session  the  court  con- 
sidered the  protest,  after  previously  receiving  the  promise  of 
support  from  the  county  lieutenant,  Winston.  They  affirmed 
that  the  right  oath  had  been  tendered  to  Bentley,  and  offered 
again  to  permit  him  to  take  it  either  before  the  court,  one  of  the 
justices,  or  the  county  lieutenant ;  if  he  did  not  wish  to  do  this  he 
was  permitted  to  bring  in  and  show  the  oath  which  he  claimed 
to  have  taken. 

Bentley's  answer  was  a  public  announcement  that  he  was 
starting  for  Virginia  to  carry  his  case  before  the  governor  and 
council.^  Another  reason  for  his  going  was  his  desire  to  collect 
the  money  for  the  certificates  which  he  and  Dodge  had  bought  up, 
and  about  the  first  of  April  he  together  with  his  two  assistants. 
Dodge  and  Captain  Rogers,  departed. ^ 

This  proceeding  of  Bentley  called  for  immediate  action  on  the 
part  of  the  French  in  order  to  counteract  the  influence  which  would 
be  exerted  against  them,  and  it  was  decided  to  send  representa- 
tives to  Virginia.  But  there  were  preparations  to  make  before 
they  could  take  their  departure.  Besides  the  affair  w,th  Bentley 
the  inhabitants  wished  to  send  the  bills  and  accounts  of  the  people 
against  the  state,  and  asked  Cahokia  to  unite  in  this.  The  Kas- 
kaskians  chose  Richard  McCarty  and  Pierre  Prevost  to  represent 

^  All  the  papers  here  indicated  belong  to  the  Menard  Collection  and  are  therefore  copies 
from  the  Kaskaskia  Register,  except  the  letter  of  the  court  to  Rogers,  which  is  among  the 
Kaskaskia  records.  They  are  all  written  in  French.  Besides  those  mentioned  in  the  text 
are  two  certificates  that  the  oath  tendered  to  Bentley  was  the  oath  of  fidelity,  one  by  Winston 
and  the  other  by  Daniel  Murray.  The  latter  had  been  brought  into  court  by  Bentley  liim- 
self  to  witness  the  taking  of  the  oath.  The  only  explanation  of  Bentley 's  action  is  that  he 
feared  the  news  of  his  ha\'ing  taken  the  oath  would  reach  Canada. 

2  Va.  State  Papers,  ii.,  258  and  260;  Dr.  MSS.,  51JS2.  After  arriWng  at  the  Falls  of  the 
Ohio,  criticisms  of  his  conduct  came  to  the  ears  of  Captain  Rogers  and  he  wrote  a  letter  to 
Governor  Jefferson  defending  himself.  He  accused  Winston  and  McCarty  with  being  the 
authors  of  his  difficulties  by  persuading  the  inhabitants  not  to  furnish  provisions  for  his 
troops;  and  had  not  Bentley  offered  his  personal  credit  the  troops  would  have  starved,  al- 
though meat  was  o.bundant.  He  enclosed  the  affidavits  of  officers  and  citizens  to  prove  his 
statement.  He  ended  by  writing:  "I  cannot  conclude  without  informing  you  that  'tis  my 
positive  opinion  the  people  of  the  Illinois  &  Post  Vincennes  have  been  in  an  absolute  state 
of  RebeUion  for  these  several  months  past  &  ought  to  have  no  further  Indulgence  shewn 
them,  &  such  is  the  nature  of  these  people,  the  more  they  are  indulged,  the  more  turbulent 
they  grow  —  &  I  look  upon  it  that  Winston  &  McCarty  have  been  the  principle  instruments 
to  bring  them  to  the  pitch  they  are  now  at."     (Va.  State  Papers,  ii.,  76.) 

I  should  have  given  greater  weight  to  the  testimony  of  this  letter,  were  not  the  character 
and  actions  of  Bentley  and  Dodge  at  this  and  other  times  well  known  from  various  sources. 
See  this  vol.,  pp.  475,  621;  Kas.  Rec,  Petitions,  etc. 


INTRODUCTION  ciii 

them.  The  agreement  with  them  was  made  on  the  fifth  of  May 
and  signed  by  forty-one  inhabitants,  the  most  representative  of  the 
village.  *  The  people  of  Cahokia  had  not  learned  to  trust  McCarty, 
even  after  his  change  of  parties,  for  they  remembered  his  arrogance 
and  tyranny  while  he  commanded  the  troops  in  their  village. 
They  therefore  chose  only  Prevost.^  Meanwhile  the  clerk  of  the 
Kaskaskia  court  had  prepared  copies  of  all  the  papers  throwing 
light  on  the  hard  treatment  the  people  had  endured  and  all  other 
matters.  These  were  countersigned  by  Richard  Winston,  deputy 
county  lieutenant,  who  at  this  time  was  supporting  the  French 
party.  A  five  page  memorial  was  written  to  the  governor  setting 
forth  in  detail  the  grievances  of  the  people  and  was  signed  by 
sixty-two  Kaskaskians.3 

It  was  an  unpropitious  time  to  petition  Virginia,  since  the 
scene  of  war  in  the  East  had  been  shifted  to  her  territory  and  she 
could  give  little  heed  to  her  western  dependencies.  The  Kas- 
kaskia papers  did  not,  however,  reach  their  destination;  for 
one  of  the  bearers,  Richard  McCarty,  while  on  his  way  was  met 
and  killed  by  the  Indians  and  his  papers  carried  to  Detroit. 
What  became  of  Prevost  is  not  known.  This  event  was  to  bear 
immediate  results.  Learning  from  McCarty's  papers  that  the 
French  were  heartily  weary  of  the  Virginians,  the  British  officers 
determined  to  use  other  means  than  war  to  recover  their  dominion 
over  the  Illinois.* 

Since  Clark  with  his  half-naked  Virginians  had  surprised  them 

1  Kas.  Rec,  Pol.  Papers. 

*See  post,  p.  479. 

^Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers,  the  original  memorial  with  signatures.  A  copy  of  the 
memorial  is  in  Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xlviii.,  i.  A  similar  one  was  sent  from  Vincennes  on 
June  30.  Va.  Staie  Papers,  {{.,  192.  It  is  from  the  papers  prepared  at  this  time  that  the  fore- 
going narrative  is  largely  drawn.  They  never  reached  Virginia,  but  in  the  year  1787  these 
same  papers  were  given  to  another  agent,  named  Tardiveau,  who  had  them  in  his  possession 
when  he  died.  As  he  was  indebted  for  a  considerable  sum  to  Pierre  Menard,  the  later  lieutenant 
governor  of  Illinois,  the  judge  of  Cape  Girardeau,  where  Tardiveau  was  living  previous  to 
his  death,  turned  them  over  to  Menard.  These  I  found  in  a  warehouse  on  the  banks  of 
the  Mississippi  at  Fort  Gage,  Illinois;  and  they  have  been  presented  by  their  owner,  the 
grandson  of  Pierre  Menard,  to  the  Illinois  State  Historical  Library. 

*De  Peyster  to  Powell,  July  12,  1781,  Mich.  Pio.  and  Hist.  Col.,  xix.,  646.  See  also 
Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xlviii.,  19.  Since  the  papers,  which  should  have  been  in  the  possession 
of  McCarty  at  the  time  of  his  death,  were  in  Kaskaskia  in  1787  (see  previous  note),  it  is 
necessary  to  conclude  that  McCarty  did  not  carry  with  him  the  important  copies  from  the 
record-book  and  that  Prevost,  who  was  to  have  carried  them,  never  started  or  returned  with 
them,  or  else  that  duplicates  were  made  for  the  two  messengers.  The  last  alternative  is 
probably  the  correct  explanation. 


civ  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

on  that  July  night  in  1778,  the  people  of  Illinois  had  passed 
through  many  phases  of  feeling  towards  the  Americans.  They 
had  at  first  rejoiced  that  at  last  the  liberty  which  had  been  the 
subject  of  their  dreams  was  to  be  enjoyed.  There  followed  a  few 
months  of  peace  under  Clark's  mild  rule,  when  the  French 
actually  stripped  themselves  of  their  property  to  supply  the 
troops  with  necessities  and  to  further  the  cause  which  they 
had  adopted.  Then  the  anxious  days  came  when  the  vandalism 
of  the  troops  and  the  doubt  about  the  payment  for  their  goods 
made  them  less  jubilant.  They  received  Todd  with  his  civil 
government  as  a  prophet  of  a  new  era.  Todd  had  failed  and 
had  handed  them  over  to  the  military,  and  Montgomery  had  suc- 
ceeded in  so  thoroughly  cowing  them,  that  their  power  of  opposi- 
tion was  weak.  De  la  Balme  had  aroused  them  by  the  new  born 
hope  of  once  more  coming  under  the  dominion  of  France,  and  he 
too  had  failed;  but  their  pride  in  the  name  of  Frenchmen  had 
been  awakened  and  from  that  hour  their  opposition  to  the  Vir- 
ginians was  more  forceful.  The  number  of  troops  in  the  Illinois 
under  Rogers  was  not  large,  so  their  boldness  had  little  cause 
for  fear  from  that  source ;  but  the  long  struggle  against  poverty 
and  tyranny  was  telling  on  their  courage,  and  many  were  beginning 
to  look  to  England,  their  allegiance  to  which  they  had  so  lightly 
repudiated,  as  a  power  that  might  possibly  offer  them  protection. 
The  feeling  was  not  an  active  force,  but  simply  an  indifference  in 
regard  to  what  might  happen.  The  intercourse  with  Canada 
had  not  been  completely  broken  off  by  the  war,  for  the  French 
there  found  opportunity  now  and  then  to  send  their  goods  to 
their  brothers  in  the  Illinois. 

This  feeling  of  a  possible  renewal  of  relations  with  England  was 
not  confined  to  the  French  of  the  Northwest.  Among  the  western 
Americans  also  the  same  attitude  was  to  be  found.  George  Mor- 
gan, writing  at  this  time,  mentions  a  letter  he  had  received  in 
regard  to  Kentucky,  where  the  indifference  to  the  American  cause 
appears  to  have  been  widespread,  due  largely  to  events  somewhat 
similar  to  those  affecting  the  lUinois.^ 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  46J5Q. 


INTRODUCTION  cv 

It  was  this  feeling  that  gave  the  British  hope  that  they  might 
persuade  the  French  to  renew  their  allegiance  to  the  British  crown. 
In  June  the  lieutenant  governor  of  Michillimackinac  sent  six  men 
to  the  Illinois  to  see  what  could  be  accomplished.  In  the  three 
accounts,  printed  in  this  volume/  their  exact  mission  is  differently 
described;  in  one  it  was  to  excite  the  people  to  offensive  action 
against  the  Spaniards,  in  another  to  raise  militia  to  be  paid  by 
the  British,  and  in  the  third  to  make  a  commercial  treaty.  The 
agents  made  the  mistake  of  going  first  to  St.  Louis,  probably  to 
open  negotiations  with  the  French  of  that  city,  who  appear  to 
have  been  as  discontented  as  their  relatives  on  the  other  bank. 
They  were  arrested  by  the  Spanish  commandant,  Cruzat,  and 
a  letter  addressed  to  the  inhabitants  of  Kaskaskia  and  Cahokia  was 
found  in  their  possession.  A  copy  of  this  letter  was  sent  to  Major 
John  Williams,  who  had  replaced  Captain  Rogers  at  Kaskaskia. 

Cruzat  gave  every  appearance  of  acting  in  good  faith  towards 
the  Americans  in  this  matter,  and  evidently  did  arouse  the 
discontent  of  the  people  in  the  Illinois  who  felt  that  their  letter 
should  have  been  sent  to  them.  But  the  Spaniard  was  crafty 
and  no  doubt  would  have  been  willing  to  see  the  eastern  bank 
pass  again  into  the  hands  of  the  British  in  order  that  Spain  might 
reconquer  it.^  Cruzat  was  clever  enough  to  persuade  Linctot, 
a  Virginia  Indian  agent  at  the  time  in  St.  Louis,  and  possibly 
Gratiot,  of  his  loyalty  to  the  Americans.  This  may  be  seen  by  the 
letters  of  these  two  written  to  Clark,  July  31  and  August  i,  in 
praise  of  the  action  in  withholding  the  letter  and  messengers 
from  the  French  of  the  American  Bottom.  But  six  weeks  before 
those  letters  were  written  the  Spanish  governor  had  reached  an 
understanding  with  the  Illinois  people,  and  two  of  the  British 
agents  were  permitted  to  go  to  Cahokia,  provided  they  found 
bondsmen.  The  agents  accomplished  very  little,  however,  owing 
to  their  initial  mistake ;  but  that  the  undertaking  might  have  been 
successful  or  the  mistake  even  rectified  may  be  inferred  from  a 
letter  of  Antoine  Girardin  to  Governor  Sinclair.^    Girardin  was 

^  See  post,  p.  553,  555,  559. 

2  Doniol,  Hist,  de  la  Participation,  iv.,  ch.  6. 

3  See /><75<,2pp.  95,  559. 


cvi  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

one  of  the  most  important  citizens  of  Cahokia  at  this  time,  had 
been  elected  one  of  the  members  of  the  first  court,  and  was  the 
most  enterprising  man  in  the  village.  His  position  was  such 
that  he  understood  the  feeling  of  the  people,  and  his  letter  probably 
reflected  their  attitude  correctly.  He  wrote  that,  if  a  force  of 
British  soldiers  without  any  Indians  should  be  sent  to  the  Illinois, 
he  was  sure  the  people  would  receive  them;  and  at  the  same 
time  he  offered  his  assistance.  It  is  possible  that,  had  the  British 
acted  promptly,  they  might  have  succeeded.  Yet  possibly  not, 
for  shortly  after  this  letter  was  written,  the  news  of  the  surrender 
of  Cornwallis  reached  the  West  and  naturally  raised  the  hopes 
of  those  who  still  clung  to  the  American  cause. 

Diuring  the  summer  of  1781  the  court  at  Kaskaskia  had  tried 
to  assert  itself  in  the  interests  of  good  order.  Certain  American 
settlers  had  followed  the  example  of  the  troops  in  killing  the 
cattle  of  the  French.  As  long  as  the  soldiers  were  present,  they 
were  safe  from  prosecution,  but  now,  when  there  does  not  appear 
to  have  been  any  garrison  at  Fort  Clark,  indictments  were  brought 
against  six  Americans  by  eleven  Frenchmen  for  shooting  the 
cows  and  other  animals  in  the  commons.  The  Americans  were 
arrested  and  tried;  the  charge  was  proved  against -them  and  three 
were  banished  from  the  country  for  three  years  and  the  others 
fined.  ^ 

The  justices  also  dared  make  opposition  to  the  deputy  county 
lieutenant.  Without  consulting  the  court,  Winston  appointed, 
as  notary  public,  Antoine  Labuxiere,  son  of  Joseph  Labuxiere 
who  held  the  ofl&ce  of  state's  attorney  after  the  resignation  of 
Jean  Girault.^  The  first  opposition  to  this  appointment  came 
from  the  notary-clerk  of  the  court,  Carbonneaux,  who,  perhaps, 
was  not  anxious  to  have  a  rival.  The  court  supported  their 
clerk  and  Winston  was  obliged  to  yield.  The  principal  reasons 
alleged  by  the  court  for  their  objection  were  the  youth  of  Antoine 
Labuxiere  and  the  law  that  no  officer  could  be  appointed  except 

1  Kas.  Rec,  Court  Papers;  Transactions  of  the  111.  Hi^t.  Soc.  1906,  p.  258,  et  seq. 

2  See  post,  p.  487 . 


INTRODUCTION  cvii 

by  the  vote  of  the  people.  Winston  answered  that  he  was  in  no 
way  responsible  for  his  actions  to  the  court  but  only  to  the  state 
of  Virginia.^ 

The  unfriendly  relation  existing  between  the  county  lieutenant 
and  the  court  that  is  evident  from  the  foregoing  instance  had 
existed  ever  since  the  appointment  of  the  former,  and  from  now 
on  appears  to  have  increased,  until  Winston  had  few  adherents 
among  the  French  inhabitants,  a  circumstance  which  he  was  to 
regret  in  the  future.  Exactly  what  bearing  this  disagreement  had 
upon  a  new  election  of  justices  at  this  time  it  is  impossible  to 
say.  Four  justices  from  Kaskaskia,  Lasource,  Janis,  Lachance, 
and  Charles  Charleville,  had  held  ofl&ce  for  over  two  years,  in  fact 
ever  since  the  election  held  by  Todd.  The  other  two  members 
had  been  Duplasy  and  Cerrd.  The  former  had  been  killed  in 
the  De  la  Balme  expedition  and  the  latter  had  gone  to  St.  Louis. 
As  far  as  the  record  shows  only  one  of  these  places  had  been  filled, 
by  the  election  of  Michel  Godin.  The  two  justices  from  Prairie 
du  Rocher  were  to  remain  unchanged  for  another  year.  It  is 
not  known  what  became  of  the  Sieur  de  Girardot  who  represented 
St.  Philippe.  All  the  justices  desired  to  continue  in  office,  but 
since  the  list  of  magistrates  was  not  complete,  two  more,  J.  Bte. 
Charleville  and  Antoine  Bauvais,  had  been  elected  to  fill  the 
vacancies  on  July  19th.  The  prolongation  of  their  tenure  of 
office  by  the  justices  was  not  popular,  and  it  is  possible  that  Wins- 
ton utilized  the  opportunity  to  bring  such  pressure  to  bear  that 
the  coiut  was  obliged  to  submit ;  for  on  the  tenth  of  September  he 
was  requested  to  permit  the  summoning  of  an  assembly  of  the 
people  to  "elect  magistrates  to  fill  the  places  of  those  who  had 
held  their  position  for  two  years  or  more."  ^  The  assembly  was 
called  the  same  day  and  there  is  in  existence  the  polling  sheet 
that  was  used.  Perhaps  on  account  of  the  shortness  of  the  notice 
or  for  some  other  reason  only  twenty-seven  votes  were  cast,  not 
exceeding  by  many  the  number  of  candidates  which  was  sixteen. 
Antoine  Morin  was  the  most  popular  candidate  receiving  twenty 

^  Five  letters  in  Kas.  Rec,  written  in  August,  1781. 
.1     '  Kas.  Rec,  Petitions. 


cviii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  QOLLECTIONS 

votes.  The  next  one  on  the  list  was  Pierre  Langlois  with  eigh- 
teen votes;  the  third  was  Vitale  Bauvais,  whose  brother  had 
been  ejected  in  July,  and  whose  family  was  at  this  time  and 
later  one  of  the  most  influential  among  the  French  population; 
the  fourth  was  Pierre  Picard  with  eleven  votes.  The  other 
candidates  had  only  a  few  supporters.  The  analysis  of  the  vote 
would  indicate  that  Winston  had  not  been  supported  at  the  poll 
and  that  his  opponents  had  carried  their  candidates.  At  the 
bottom  of  the  polling  sheet  is  written  the  certificate  of  election. 
The  clerk  first  wrote  the  name  of  Pierre  Langlois,  who  was  more 
friendly  to  Winston  than  the  other  justices,  as  president  of  the 
new  court,  although  he  had  received  fewer  votes  than  Morin. 
He  then  crossed  this  name  off  and  substituted  that  of  J.  Bte. 
Charleville,  one  of  the  justices  chosen  in  the  July  election,  who  may 
have  had  a  prior  right  to  this  position.  His  vote  had  been  cast 
for  the  four  successful  candidates  and  he  was  and  remained  a  firm 
adherent  of  the  French  party.  Whatever  the  explanation 
of  the  erasure  is,  neither  of  the  two  men  became  president 
of  the  court,  for  the  position  was  held  during  the  following 
year  by  Antoine  Bauvais,  who  was  one  of  the  justices  elected 
in  July.^ 

Kaskaskia  was  not  to  have  the  burden  of  many  troops  during 
the  next  winter;  but  the  village  did  not  wholly  escape  persecution, 
for  two  of  the  men  formerly  most  troublesome  returned.  It  is 
true  that  the  one  who  had  made  himself  most  offensive,  Thomas 
Bentley,  never  again  visited  this  country.  He  failed  in  his  attempt 
to  realize  on  all  the  certificates  which  he  had  bought  from  the 
French  His  petition  to  the  Virginia  council  was  denied,  and 
that  body  intimated  that  the  gentleman  was  an  impostor.  Bent- 
ley  defended  himself  against  the  accusation  and  appealed  to  the 
letter  of  General  Clark  and  to  the  testimony  of  Colonel  Mont- 
gomery and  John  Dodge.^  Possibly  on  account  of  the  character 
of  his  attestors,  one  of  his  claims  was  afterward  allowed.  He 
was  still  in  Richmond  waiting  for  its  payment  in  July,  1783,  and 

1  Kas.  Rec,  Pol.  Papers  and  Petitions.  A  year  after  this  date  both  the  clerk,  Carbon- 
neaux,  and  Langlois  were  supporters  of  Winston. 

2  Va.  State  Papers,  ii.,  238. 


I 


INTRODUCTION  cix 

probably  died  during  the  year,  for  his  wife  began  the  process  for 
the  settlement  of  the  estate  shortly  afterwards.^ 

When  Rogers  and  Dodge  returned  to  Kaskaskia  I  do  not  know, 
but  there  is  a  characteristic  letter  from  Rogers  dated  November 
lo,  1781,  demanding  supplies.  His  threats  were  somewhat 
modified.  He  said  that  if  the  people  did  not  give  him  what  was 
needed  for  his  thirty  troops,  two  hundred  would  be  sent ;  but  there 
was  no  suggestion  of  setting  aside  the  court.  He  claims  to  have 
been  acting  under  orders^  and  was  probably  sent  to  Kaskaskia 
more  to  reconnoiter  than  to  act  as  a  guard,  for  Clark  expected  that 
the  British  would  make  one  more  attempt  to  win  the  West,  which 
had  become  more  important  to  them  now  that  the  southern 
campaign  had  ended  in  the  capture  of  Cornwallis.  Rogers 
evidently  did  not  remain  long  in  the  country,  for  before  the 
winter  ended  Clark  informed  the  governor  that  Vincennes  had  been 
completely  evacuated  and  that  only  a  few  spies  were  kept  at  any 
of  the  villages.^  Dodge  had  probably  returned  with  Rogers  and 
remained  in  the  village.  Before  twelve  months  had  passed  the 
records  were  to  give  no  uncertain  account  of  the  activities  of  the 
"illustrious  Dodge." 

There  is  among  the  Kaskaskia  Records  a  long  and  interesting 
letter  in  the  French  language  written  in  December  by  George 
Rogers  Clark  to  the  court  of  Kaskaskia,  in  which  he  states  that 
he  has  learned  that  there  are  in  the  village  numerous  refugees 
and  vagabonds  who  are  disturbing  the  peace  and  tranquility  of 
the  community  by  stealing  property  in  spite  of  the  authority  of 
the  court.  He  laments  this  fact  and  urges  the  court  to  use  its 
power  even  to  the  extent  of  inflicting  corporal  punishment  or  the 
death  penalty.  He  tells  the  justices  to  make  use  of  their  militia 
and  to  call  on  the  other  villages  for  aid.  Just  what  circum- 
stances drew  this  letter  from  Clark  will  probably  never  be 
known;  but  the  things  he  speaks  of  were  constantly  happening, 
so  that  he  might  have  written  such  a  letter  at  any  time  after  he 

^Kas.  Rec,  Petitions. 

2  Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers. 

'  Va.  State  Papers,  ii.,  68;  a  letter  from  Colonel  Davies  to  the  governor  implies  the  same  . 
Ibid,  iii.,  198. 


ex  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

entered  the  country.  The  interesting  point  is  that  he  desired  the 
court  to  uphold  its  authority,  and  there  is  nothing  to  indicate 
that  he  authorized  the  unnecessarily  harsh  and  arbitrary  mea- 
sures of  his  officers.  In  notifying  the  French  of  the  surrender 
of  Cornwallis  he  gave  them  the  hope  that  a  better  day  was  coming 
for  them.* 

Of  the  winter  of  1 781-1782  there  are  no  records  except  such  as 
show  that  the  court  was  regularly  sitting  and  performing  its 
duties.  A  single  document  should  be  mentioned.  On  February 
loth  another  election  was  held  to  appoint  a  single  magistrate. 
Fifteen  votes  were  cast  of  which  Stanicles  Levasseur  received 
five  and  was  elected.  Whose  place  he  filled  cannot  be  discovered, 
for  there  remain  no  lists  of  the  judges  like  those  of  the  court  of 
Cahokia. 

The  year  1782  was  to  be  the  last  one  of  the  war.  The  Vir- 
ginians had  managed  to  hold  the  country  northwest  of  the  Ohio 
for  almost  four  years  and  this  last  was  to  pass  without  real  danger. 
Rocheblave,  the  former  acting  commandant  of  the  IlHnois,  had 
returned  to  Canada  and  laid  before  the  government  a  plan  for 
the  reconquest  of  the  whole  territory,  but  his  suggestions  were 
without  influence.^  Several  parties  of  Indians  were  sent  into 
the  Northwest,  however,  and  one  of  these  defeated  the  frontiers- 
men at  Blue  Licks — it  was  in  this  engagement  that  John  Todd  was 
killed;  but  no  serious  attack  was  made  on  the  French  villages. 
Clark  retaliated  by  leading  a  large  party  against  the  Miami 
villages  and  inflicting  severe  punishment.  It  was  his  last  achieve- 
ment in  the  war.^  On  November  30th,  a  few  days  after  the  Miami 
campaign,  a  provisional  treaty  of  peace  was  signed  by  England 
and  the  United  States.  The  danger  to  the  Illinois  from  Canada 
was  for  a  time  at  an  end.  On  January  18,  1783,  the  Illinois  regi- 
ment was  disbanded  *  and  in  the  following  July  Clark  was 
relieved  of  his  command.^ 

^  Kas.  Rec,  Letter. 

2  Va.  State  Papers,  iii.,  150;   Hald.  Col.,  B.,  122,  p.  545;   and  123,  p.  141. 

3  Va.  Stale  Papers,  ii.,  280,  381;   Winsor,  Westward  Movement,  203  et  seq 
*  Memorial  of  Timothe  de  Monbreun,  Va.  State  Lib. 

5  English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  ii.,  783. 


INTRODUCTION  cxi 

In  the  villages  of  the  Illinois  during  these  years  of  neglect 
we  find  as  close  an  approximation  to  the  form  of  the  classic  city- 
state  as  has  ever  existed  in  the  western  hemisphere.  For  a 
short  time  they  were  practically  cut  off  from  the  rest  of  the  world 
and  from  the  only  power  which  might  legally  exercise  authority 
over  them,  so  that  each  village  was  a  self-governing  community. 
As  we  shall  see  later  the  period  was  for  Cahokia  one  of  moderate 
prosperity  and  peace;  but  the  more  important  village,  Kaskaskia, 
passed  through  all  the  sufferings  which  her  earlier  prototypes 
experienced  during  periods  of  social  anarchy.  The  Greeks  gave 
the  special  name  of  stasis  to  that  disease  which  was  so  common  to 
their  peculiar  form  of  civil  organization.  It  was  caused  by  one 
party  within  the  state  making  the  political  issue  the  subjugation 
of  all  others, 'an  issue  which  was  pursued  with  maliciousness 
and  violence.^  In  a  famous  passage  Thucydides  has  described 
the  results  of  this  disease:  ''The  cause  of  all  these  evils  was  the 
love  of  power,  originating  in  avarice  and  ambition,  and  the  party 
spirit    which    is    engendered    in   them    when     men   are   fairly 

embarked  in  a  contest Striving  in  every  way    to 

overcome  each  other,  they  committed  the  most  monstrous  crimes ; 
yet  even  these  were  surpassed  by  the  magnitude  of  their  revenges, 
which  they  pursued  to  the  very  uttermost,  neither  party  observing 
any  definite  limits  either  of  justice  or  public  expediency,  but  both 
alike  making  the  caprice  of  the  moment  their  law.  Either  by 
the  help  of  an  unrighteous  sentence,  or  grasping  power  with  the 
strong  hand,  they  were  eager  to  satiate  the  impatience  of  party 
spirit."^  The  description  is  as  applicable  to  the  conditions 
existing  in  Kaskaskia  during  the  years  following  the  withdrawal  of 
the  Illinois  regiment  as  to  the  cities  of  Greece,  which  Thucydides 
had  in  his  mind. 

The  factional  strife  and  the  personal  enmities,  which  had  been 
engendered  by  the  past  years  in  Kaskaskia,  but  had  been  some- 
what controlled  by  the  presence  of  the  military  force,  broke  out 
in  the  most  virulent  form  of  stasis,  during  the  course  of  which  the 

^  Fowler,  City-State  of  the  Greeks  and  Romans,  254. 

2  Thucydides,  Hist,  of  the  Peloponnesian  War,  Jowett's  translation,  i.,  24. 


cxii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

love  of  power,  avarice,  and  personal  animosities  seized  control  of 
the  government,  overthrew  it,  and  left  behind  only  anarchy. 
Three  parties  entered  into  this  struggle  for  power,  and  probably 
the  final  blame  for  the  result  must  be  ascribed  in  part  to  all. 
The  mass  of  the  French  inhabitants  made  up  what  may  be  called 
the  French  party,  the  leaders  of  which  were  the  justices  of  the 
district  court.  These  latter  considered  themselves  the  chief  repre- 
sentatives of  sovereignty  and  would  have  been  glad  to  compel 
submission  by  all  rivals.  The  strength  of  this  party  was  rather 
greater  in  the  district  than  in  the  village  proper,  where  the  people 
were  more  divided  in  their  allegiance  and  more  cowed  by  their 
opponents.^  Its  members  were  hostile  to  the  Americans  who 
had  settled  among  them  and  feared  that  they  would  be  finally 
overcome  in  numbers  and  lose  their  French  laws  and  officers. 
They  looked  upon  the  deputy  county  lieutenant  in  particular  as 
an  enemy,  who  would  take  the  first  opportunity  to  make  himself 
supreme  and  whose  action  in  trying  to  placate  the  Virginians  and 
at  the  same  time  to  incite  the  French  to  opposition  they  regarded 
as  treacherous.^  It  is  probably  true  that  the  leaders  of  the  party 
were  ignorant,  as  Winston  asserted,  and  incapable  under  the 
existing  conditions  of  fulfilling  the  duties  which  the  accidents  of 
war  and  geographical  position  had  thrust  upon  them.^ 

Winston  had  a  small  following  among  the  French,  led  by 
Pierre  Langlois,  one  of  the  justices,  and  Carbonneaux,  the  clerk 
of  the  court.  Some  of  the  Americans  had  also  attached  them- 
selves to  his  party.  His  contempt  for  the  French  was  only  less 
than  his  hatred  of  John  Dodge,  the  leader  of  the  third  party, 
whom  he  regarded  as  his  chief  rival.  The  hostility  of  the 
two  men  dated  back  to  the  time  when  Montgomery  was  still 
commanding  in  the  Illinois,  and,  since  Dodge  had  always 
been  associated  with  the  military  party,  the  personal  strife 
between  them  appears  to  be  a  continuation  of  the  struggle  be- 

1  The  strength  of  the  party  is  learned  from  the  various  petitions  and  memorials  sent  to 
Congress  and  elsewhere,  to  which  reference  is  made  in  the  text.  (See  p.  cxvii.,  n.  2.)  _  When 
the  party  gained  control  of  the  government  in  1786,  its  leaders  were  men  of  Prairie  du 
Rocher. 

2  Memorials  of  the  people,  to  Va.  Commissioners,  Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers. 

3  Deposition  of  Carbonneaux,  who  was  an  adherent  of  Winston,  Va.  State  Papers,  iii.,  430. 


INTRODUCTION  cxiii 

tween  the  army  and  the  civil  government,  which  had  broken  out 
when  John  Todd  was  still  in  the  county.^  That  Dodge  actually 
held  a  military  commission  at  this  time  is  extremely  doubtful.  He 
had  been  appointed  Indian  agent  for  Virginia  and  even  used  that 
title  occasionally  during  the  year  1782.  Since  Clark  had  never 
trusted  him  and  his  reputation  among  the  Virginia  officials  was 
none  too  good,  it  is  not  probable  that  he  had  been  promoted 
to  a  position  in  the  army.^  However,  after  the  departure  of 
Captain  Rogers,  Dodge  gave  himself  out  as  commandant  of 
troops  in  Kaskaskia  and  was  able  to  persuade  many  of  the  French 
people  to  acknowledge  his  authority.  With  him  were  associated 
Israel  Dodge,^  who  seemed  ready  enough  to  follow  his  energetic 
and  capable  brother,  and  the  more  turbulent  American  immi- 
grants. For  the  next  few  years  John  Dodge  is  the  power  in  the 
village  of  Kaskaskia.  Unfortunately  most  of  the  records  of  his 
interesting  career,  which  the  clerk  of  the  court  carefully  preserved, 
have  been  destroyed,  so  that  the  details  can  only  be  obtained 
from  the  rather  unsatisfactory  petitions  of  the  inhabitants  to 
Congress. 

Dodge's  first  attack  was  on  the  deputy  county  Heutenant,  in 
the  summer  of  1782.  The  fear  of  renewed  British  invasions  and 
possible  treachery  were  his  excuses.  Winston  had  become 
thoroughly  exasperated  with  the  actions  of  the  Virginia  troops, 
and  probably  desired  to  identify  himself  with  the  French  party. 
At  any  rate  he  went  about  among  the  people  telling  them  that 
Dodge  and  the  officers  who  had  been  in  the  Illinois  were  vaga- 
bonds and  robbers,  who  had  only  come  to  the  French  villages 
for  the  purpose  of  pillaging.  There  is  no  proof  that  he  enter- 
tained treasonable  designs,  and  his  remarks  give  evidence  of  be- 


1  Winston  to  Todd,  October  24,  1780,  Va.  Stale  Papers,  i.,  380;  Dodge  to  Clark,  March 
3,   1783,  Dr.  MSS.,  S2J78. 

2 1  have  failed  to  find  any  such  commission.  He  was  always  called  captain,  but  the  title 
was  not  received  for  ser\'ice  under  Clark,  as  his  name  does  not  appear  in  any  list  of  ofl&cers 
and  troops  serving  in  the  West.  (English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  ii.,  1060  et  seq.)  Colonel 
Davies  wrote  to  the  governor  of  Virginia  on  June  22,  1782,  that  he  did  not  think  there  were 
any  troops  in  the  Illinois  or  had  been  for  some  time.     Va.  Stale  Papers,  iii.,  198. 

3  Israel  Dodge  was  the  father  of  Hon.  Henry  Dodge,  whose  life  is  so  closely  connected 
with  the  history  of  the  West. 


cxiv  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

ing  inspired  solely  by  personal  dislike,  and  enmity  tojindividuals ; 
for  he  excepted  Clark  from  his  general  condemnation. 

On  April  29th  John  Dodge  issued  an  order,  which  he  signed  as 
captain  commandant,  to  his  brother  Israel  to  take  a  party  and 
bring  Richard  Winston  before  him  to  give  an  account  of  his  con- 
duct. Even  if  he  had  held  a  military  commission  such  an  order 
was  entirely  illegal;  and  his  next  act  was  still  more  so,  for  he 
ordered  that  Winston  should  be  imprisoned  because  he,  "has 
been  guilty  of  treasonable  expressions  Against  the  State  and  offi- 
cer who  have  the  hon^  of  wearing  Commission  in  the  Service  of 
their  Country;  damned  them  all  a  set  of  thieves  and  Robers  and 
only  come  to  the  Country  for  that  purpose.  The  above  Crime 
being  proved  before,  i  now  deliver  him  to  you  prisoner  and  re- 
quest of  you  to  Keep  him  in  surety  until  he  may  be  brought  to 
justice."  ^ 

The  day  of  the  arrest  Mrs.  Winston  appealed  to  Antoine  Bau- 
vais  to  assemble  the  court  and  summon  the  Dodges  to  appear 
and  justify  their  actions.  The  court  met  at  one  o'clock  the  same 
day  but  refused  to  take  cognizance  of  the  affair,  probably  being 
willing  that  their  two  enemies  should  fight  it  out.  On  the  next 
day  Dodge  wrote  to  Joseph  Labuxiere,  state's  attorney,  and  asked 
for  his  co-operation.  Labuxiere's  training  was  not  such  as  fitted 
him  to  oppose  the  military  power.  He  had  served  under  France 
and  Spain  where  orders  from  the  captain  in  command  were  obeyed, 
so  he  took  up  the  case;  but  he  protested  that  he  would  not  hold 
himself  responsible  to  the  state  or  to  Winston  for  the  events  and 
prejudice  which  might  result  therefrom.  He  said,  however,  that 
he  was  bound  to  give  information  to  the  council  of  Virginia  and 
to  General  Clark  and  that  he  had  been  unable  to  persuade  the 
court  to  draw  up  the  process  against  Winston  without  a  deposit  of 
money,  which  neither  he  nor  Dodge  possessed.  Labuxiere  sum- 
moned the  witnesses,  who  were  named  by  Dodge,  to  appear 
before  him.  The  first  was  Michel  Perrault,  captain  of  infantry, 
who  testified  that  he  wrote  to  Winston  for  some  supplies  belonging 

1  The  charge  against  Winston  was  true,  for  the  French  themselves  said  the  same  thing  in  a 
memorial  to  the  Virginia  Commissioners.     Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers. 


INTRODUCTION  cxv 

to  the  state  and  that  Winston  sent  part  of  them ;  that  later  the 
witness,  being  reduced  to  "indigence,"  had  sold  some  of  these, 
and  Winston  had  then  said  to  him  that  he  was  following  in  the 
footsteps  of  his  superiors  who  were  a  band  of  thieves.  The 
next  witness  was  Major  John  Williams,  former  captain  of  infantry. 
He  said  that  he  had  frequently  heard  Winston  swear  at  all  the 
officers  of  the  Illinois  troops  except  General  Clark  and  declare 
that  they  had  come  to  the  country  only  to  rob  and  steal.  The 
third  witness  was  Henry  Smith,  who  called  himself  improperly  a 
former  captain  in  the  Illinois  battalion. ^  He  repeated  the  testi- 
mony of  Williams.  Labuxiere  ended  his  account  of  the  testi- 
mony with  a  statement  that  he  was  aware  that  he  had  exceeded 
his  duties  in  thus  summoning  witnesses  before  him,  but  that  he 
thought  the  importance  of  the  case  demanded  his  action. 

While  Winston  remained  in  prison,  some  friend  or  his  wife 
obtained  possession  of  John  Todd's  record-book,  which  was  pro- 
bably in  Winston's  house  as  it  was  the  property  of  the  county 
lieutenant,  and  entered  therein  this  protest:  "Kaskaskia  in  the 
Illinois  29th  april  1782.  Eighty  and  touce.  This  day  10  oClock 
a:m  I  was  Taken  out  of  my  house  by  Isreal  Dodge  on  an  order 
Given  by  Jno.  Dodge  in  despite  of  the  Civil  authorotyDisregardled 
the  Laws  and  on  ther  Malitious  acusation  of  Jhn  Williams  and 
michel  perault  as  may  appear  by  their  deposition  I  was  Confined 
By  Tyranick  military  force  without  making  any  Legal  aplica- 
tion  to  the  Civil  Magistrates.  30th  the  attorney  for  the  State 
La  Buxiere  presented  a  petition  to  the  Court  against  Richard 
Winston  State  prisonner  in  their  Custody  the  Contents  of  which 
he  (the  attorney  for  the  State)  ought  to  heave  Communicated  to 
me  or  my  attorney  if  any  I  had."  ^ 

Winston  was  detained  in  prison  for  sixteen  days,  and  after 
his  release  persuaded  the  justices  to  hear  the  case  in  which  the 
civil  authority  had  been  so  defied.     On  June  the  30th  they  ordered 

\  In  1781,  when  he  was  among  those  prosecuted  by  the  court  for  killing  cattle  (see  supra, 
p.  cvi.)  he  testified  that  he  was  a  laborer.  His  name  does  not  appear  on  any  list  of  Clark's 
troops. 

2  John  Todd's  Record-Book  in  the  library  of  the  Chicago  Hist.  Soc.  This  protest  is  not 
in  Winstons'  handwriting.  I  have  quoted  it  in  full  in  order  to  correct  several  mistakes 
which  are  to  be  found  in  the  printed  version  in  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  CoUeciions,  iv.,  289. 


cxvi  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Labuxiere  to  inform  them  of  the  witnesses  whom  he  had  interro- 
gated and  to  send  them  a  hst  of  questions  which  he  desired 
to  have  asked,  for  they  wished  to  end  the  affair,  seeing  that 
Winston  intended  to  leave  the  country.  The  records  do  not 
contain  an  account  of  the  proceedings  before  the  court,  but 
Winston  was  acquitted.  After  this  interesting  episode  we  lose 
all  sight  of  Dodge  for  a  few  months,  and  when  he  reappears 
he  has  won  for  himself  the  mastery  of  the  village  of  Kaskaskia. 
The  steps  by  which  he  acquired  his  power  are  unknown;  but  the 
acts  of  Winston  during  the  last  months  of  1782  no  doubt  prepared 
the  way.^ 

Winston  had  good  reasons  for  feeling  that  the  court  had  not 
given  him  cordial  support  in  his  contest  for  the  rights  of  the  civil 
against  the  military  power,  and  it  was  probably  due  to  his  influence 
that  a  new  election  of  magistrates  for  Kaskaskia  was  held  shortly 
after  his  release.  On  the  sixteenth  of  June,  an  assembly  of  the 
people  of  Prairie  du  Rocher  was  held  in  the  house  of  J.  Bte. 
Barbau,  commandant  of  the  militia,  to  elect  magistrates  to  fill 
the  places  of  Barbau  and  Louvieres,  who  had  been  magistrates 
"during  the  time  fixed  by  the  code  of  government."  They  had 
held  their  positions  since  June,  1779.  The  two  newly  elected 
justices  were  Aime  Compte  and  J.  Bte.  Jacquemain.^  On  the 
fifteenth  of  September  Kaskaskia  held  a  new  election,  only  twenty- 
one  men  exercising  the  franchise,  and  six  new  magistrates  were 
chosen — J.  Bte.  Bauvais,  Louis  Brazeau,  Francois  Charleville, 
Francois  Corset,  Vitale  Bauvais,  and  Antoine  Morin ;  but  Winston 
issued  a  certificate  of  election  to  only  the  first  four,  to  whom  he 
also  wrote  a  letter  of  congratulation.^ 

It  is  to  be  noticed  that  Vitale  Bauvais  and  Morin  were  both 
members  of  the  former  court,  which  had  refused  to  support  Win- 
ston against  Dodge.     In  spite  of  the  act  of  the  county  lieutenant 

1  The  papers  in  the  foregoing  narrative  may  be  found  in  the  following  places.  In  the 
Papers  of  Old  Congress,  xlviii.,  4,  are  the  two  orders  for  arrest  and  imprisonment  of  Winston 
and  Mrs.  Winston's  appeal  with  the  call  for  the  court  on  April  29.  The  correspondence 
between  Dodge  and  Labuxiere  with  the  depositions  of  the  witnesses  and  the  court's  letter  to 
Labuxiere  belong  to  the  Cahokia  Records  in  Chicago  Hist.  Library. 

2  Kas.  Rec,  Pol.  Papers. 

3  Kas.  Rec,  Pol.  Papers  and  Letters. 


INTRODUCTION  cxvii 

the  other  justices  gave  their  support  to  their  rejected  associates 
and  Vitale  Bauvais  was  made  president,  a  position  he  held 
as  long  as  the  court  continued  to  sit. 

Beaten  once  again  at  the  election,  Winston  determined  to  use 
other  means  of  asserting  his  authority,  but  he  allowed  at  least 
two  months  to  pass  before  proceeding  to  the  final  act.  That 
act  was  decisive.  Towards  the  end  of  November,  he  posted  on 
the  church  door  a  notice  abolishing  the  court  of  the  district  of 
Kaskaskia.  Thus  by  act  of  the  civil  authority,  and  not  by  that 
of  the  military,  the  court  of  Kaskaskia  came  to  an  end.  From 
this  date  until  June,  1787,  no  bench  of  justices  held  sessions  in 
that  village.^ 

Winston  himself  had  decided  to  go  to  Virginia.  He  wished 
to  obtain  justice  against  John  Dodge,  to  petition  for  the  remodeling 
of  the  government,  and  to  recover  the  money  which  he  had  ad- 
vanced to  the  state.  His  loans  to  Virginia  had  been  considerable 
and  he  found  himself  reduced  from  affluence  to  extreme  poverty 
by  his  support  of  the  American  cause.  One  of  the  officials  of 
the  court,  the  clerk  Francois  Carbonneaux,  had  supported  Winston 
in  his  action  and  was  to  accompany  him  to  Virginia.  On  Decem- 
ber 3d,  they  persuaded  a  few  Kaskaskians  to  appoint  them 
their  agents  either  to  Virginia  or  to  Congress  for  the  above  pur- 
poses. The  signatures  to  this  document  reveal  the  strength  of 
the  party  of  the  county  lieutenant.  Of  the  signers  seven  were 
Americans  and  ten  were  Frenchmen,  of  the  latter  five  only  could 
write  and  but  one,  Pierre  Langlois,  had  held  the  position  of  justice 
of  the  peace. ^ 

1  The  existence  of  the  court  can  be  proved  up  to  November  15th.  (Kas.  Rec,  Petitions. 
That  it  was  set  aside  by  a  placard  on  the  church  door  is  proved  by  a  letter  of  the  two  Bau- 
vais and  Corset  in  1787.  (Kas.  Rec,  Letters.)  Winston  is  unquestionably  the  one  who  set 
the  court  aside,  for  in  a  memorial  to  the  Va.  commissioners,  the  French  party  wrote  that  he 
had  "annulled,  set  aside,  and  revoked  the  good  law  which  you  have  given  us  for  the  surety 
of  the  country."     Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers. 

2  From  now  on  the  petitions  to  Congress  are  numerous  and  it  is  necessary  to  depend 
upon  them  for  much  of  the  narrative,  since  the  local  material  has  been  lost  or  destroyed. 
These  petitions  must  be  used  with  caution,  for  they  emanate  from  different  parties  in  the 
Illinois  and  their  value  can  only  be  estimated  after  a  careful  analysis  of  their  contents  to 
determine  who  were  the  petitioners.  First  there  was  the  party  of  Winston.  The  first  petition 
was  carried  by  Winston  and  Carbonneaux,  but  since  Winston  died  in  Richmond  in  1784 
(Dr.  MSS.,  4J37),  Carbonneaux  was  the  representative  of  this  party  at  Congress.  They 
wanted  to  remodel  the  existing  government  and  to  make  Illinois  into  one  district  under  a 
county  Ueutenant  having  sufficient  power  to  maintain  order.  They  had  a  contempt  for  the 
French,  for  their  lack  of  intelligence,  and  for  their  failure  to  rule  themselves.  (Papers  of 
Old  Cong.,lxx.x.,  453.)    The  second  party  was  that  of  John  Dodge,  who  was  more  success- 


cxviii  ILLINOIS  •HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Before  leaving  the  country  Winston  made  provision  for  the 
maintenance  of  the  county  government  by  the  appointment,  on 
January  8th,  of  Jacques  Timothe  Boucher  Sieur  de  Monbreun, 
as  his  successor,  but  this  he  did  not  make  public  till  January 
2ist,  at  which  time  he  confirmed  the  sale  of  the  office  of  notary- 
clerk  by  Carbonneaux  to  Pierre  Langlois.^  Before  the  arrange- 
ments for  his  departure  were  completed,  the  announcement 
of  the  arrival  of  the  commissioners  for  western  affairs,  sent  by 
the  state  of  Virginia,  had  reached  Kaskaskia,  so  that  he  had  a 
further  incentive  for  haste. 

Although,  for  lack  of  other  name,  it  is  necessary  to  continue 
calling  the  government  in  the  Illinois,  the  county  of  Illinois,  legally 
the  county  had  ended  twelve  months  before  Winston  appointed 
his  successor.  It  had  been  established  by  the  act  of  the  Virginia 
assembly  in  December,  1778,  and  was  to  last  for  one  year  and 
thereafter  until  the  end  of  the  next  session  of  the  assembly.  -  It 
was  renewed  in  May,  1780,  and  continued  for  a  similar  period.^ 

ful  by  means  of  intimidation  in  winning  the  support  of  the  French  people,  including  the 
deputy  lieutenant  left  by  Winston,  and  to  whom  the  Americans  looked  for  leadership.  He 
was  not,  however,  able  to  win  over  the  prominent  members  of  the  French  party,  who  remained 
distinctly  hostile.  Dodge  and  his  followers  advocated  the  estabhshment  of  Illinois  as  a 
separate  state,  being  no  doubt  influenced  by  the  similar  demand  of  the  county  of  Ken- 
tucky. Their  petition  was  carried  by  Pentecoste  in  1784.  {Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xxx.,  435, 
463.)  The  third  party  was  that  of  the  French,  led  by  Barbau,  the  Bauvais,  Janis,  and 
others.  The  people  of  Cahokia  may  be  regarded  as  belonging  to  this  party.  The  mem- 
bers were  devoted  to  the  court  and  the  French  law  modified  by  the  Virginia  enactments, 
as  they  had  been  established  by  John  Todd;  but  the  party  had  no  objection  to  changes  in 
the  civil  organization  which  might  be  made  by  Congress;  in  fact  its  members  demanded 
a  government  from  Congress.  Their  petitions  were  carried  by  Major  Lebrun  and  Mr. 
Parker.  The  writers  of  their  communications  were  the  clerks  of  the  courts.  {Papers  oj  Old 
Cong.,  xh.,  113;  this  vol.,  p.  567,  581.)  The  fourth  set  of  petitions  were  written  by  a  faction 
of  the  French  party  which  remained  irreconcilable  after  the  attempted  settlement  by  Colonel 
Harmar  in  1787  and  continued  to  protest  against  Dodge.  (See  post  p.  xjLxvii.)  The  leaders 
were  a  priest.  Father  de  la  Valiniere,  and  the  clerk  of  the  court,  Pierre  Langlois,  both  of 
whom  wrote  the  petitions.  Their  papers  contain  information  of  value  as  they  conserve 
the  older  issues  of  the  French  party.  {Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xlviii.,  13,  19,  89.)  The  fifth 
set  of  petitions  were  of  a  very  different  character.  They  are  those  signed  by  Tardiveau, 
whose  purpose  was  to  gain  from  Congress  concessions  of  land  for  all  the  French  and  Ameri- 
cans in  the  Illinois.  He  had  persuaded  members  of  all  parties  to  sign  agreements  with  him 
to  pay  him  one  tenth  of  the  land  thus  obtained  for  his  trouble.  His  petitions  contain  few- 
details  and  statements  of  fact,  since  he  could  not  afford  to  prejudice  Congress  against  any 
of  his  clients.  They  are  very  wordy  and  full  of  flowery  phrases  and  in  proportion  to 
their  length  contain  little  of  value.  He  had  obtained  copies  of  all  the  important  memori- 
als and  papers  in  the  Kaskaskia  records  and  from  these  he  drew  his  information ;  but 
since  the  copies  he  used  are  still  in  existence,  they  furnish  better  evidence  than  his  interpre- 
tation of  them.  (See  post,  p.  ciii.  Tardiveau's  petitions  are  in  Papers  of  Old  Cong., 
xlviii.,  no  et  seq.) 

^  Memorial  of  Timothe  de  Monbreun,  Va.  State  Lib.;  Kas.  Rec,  Court  Record,  pt.ii.,  fols 
2,  5- 

2Hening,  Statutes  at  Large,  ix.,  555;    x.,  308;    this  vol.,  p.  9. 


INTRODUCTION  cxix 

At  the  next  session  there  was  an  attempt  to  have  the  act  continued, 
but  without  success.^  On  the  fifth  of  January,  1782,  the  general 
assembly  adjourned  and,  "the  statutory  organization  of  Illinois 
expired  "and  from  that  time  there  was  no  government  resting  on 
positive  provisions  of  law  in  the  Illinois  country,  until  Governor 
St.  Clair  inaugurated  the  county  of  St.  Clair  in  1790.^  . 

The  reason  for  this  action  of  the  legislature  of  Virginia  is  to 
be  found  in  the  negotiations  with  the  United  States  in  regard  to 
the  cession  of  this  territory.  A  bill  to  that  effect  was  passed  by 
the  assembly  as  early  as  January  2,  1781;  but  the  business 
dragged  through  several  sessions  of  the  United  States  Congress, 
and  the  cession  was  not  consummated  until  March  i,  1784.^ 
As  is  well  known,  it  was  not  until  1787  that  Congress  passed  an 
effective  law  regulating  the  government  in  the  Northwest  and  not 
until  the  spring  of  1790  that  the  governor  appointed  under  that 
act  reached  the  French  settlements,  so  that  during  the  period  of 
eight  years  the  people  of  the  American  Bottom  were  left  to  them- 
selves to  settle  the  problem  of  government  as  best  they  could. 

After  repeated  petitions  from  the  West  and  many  accusations 
against  officers,  Virginia  determined  in  the  year  1782  to  send  a 
board  of  commissioners  to  these  regions  to  investigate  the  claims 
against  her  and  the  whole  question  of  the  finances  of  the  Western 
army.  The  accounts  and  bills  as  they  had  come  to  Virginia  were 
greatly  confused;  for  Montgomery,  George,  and  other  officers 
had  made  drafts  without  authority,  and  the  amounts  appeared 
large  and  were  drawn  for  specie,  so  that  fraud  was  suspected.* 
The  commissioners  did  not  start  for  the  West  until  October. 
They  sent  from  Lincoln  county  on  December  4th  a  notice  of 
their  appointment  and  powers  to  Kaskaskia  and  Vincennes  and 


I  Jour.  House  of  Del.,  Va.,  Oct.  Sess.,  1781;  Boggess,  Immigration  into  Illinois  (thesis 
in  MS). 

2 See  Boyd,  "The  County  of  Illinois,"  in  Am^r.  Hist.  Rev.,  iv.,  No.  4,  P-  625. 

^Jour.  of  Cong.,  viii.,  199,  203,  253;  ix.,  47  et  seq.;  'Remng,Statutesat  Large,  id.,  571  et 
seq. 

*  Montgomery  was  authorized  by  Clark  to  draw  on  him  and  the  treasury  of  Virginia;  but 
the  people  preferred  drafts  on  Pollock  in  New  Orleans.  These  Montgomery  was  forced  to 
give  and  justified  his  action  before  a  court  of  inquiry  in  1781.  Va.  State  Papers,  iii.,  433. 
See  also  iii.,  56,  and  instructions  and  letter  of  Governor  Harrison,  Dr.  MSS.,  46J69,  72. 


cxx  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

requested  that  word  be  sent  to  Cahokia  and  St.  Louis.  A  meeting 
at  the  Falls  of  the  Ohio  was  set  for  January  isth.^ 

On  arriving  at  the  appointed  place  of  meeting,  the  commis- 
sioners found  no  one.  They  suspected  that  Clark  and  his  officers 
were  conspiring  to  keep  the  French  representatives  from  them, 
for  they  learned  that  the  clerk  of  Kaskaskia,  Carbonneaux,  and 
the  delegates  from  Vincennes  had  arrived  at  the  Falls  and  been 
sent  away.^  Whether  their  suspicions  were  correct  or  not  it  is 
impossible  to  say.  If  correct,  the  attempt  was  not  successful;  for 
the  commissioners  were  overtaken  at  Logan  in  the  spring  by 
Winston  and  Carbonneaux.  The  latter  made  an  accusation  of 
ignorance  and  neglect  of  duty  against  the  justices  of  Kaskaskia. 
He  also  recommended  a  stronger  government  for  the  country 
and  said  that  some  persons  were  setting  themselves  up  as  lords 
of  the  land.  The  commissioners  believed  that  he  represented 
the  better  elements  of  his  village,  instead  of  a  minority  as  was  the 
case.  Winston  did  not  make  any  deposition  at  this  time.  He 
accompanied  the  commissioners  to  Richmond,  where  he  died 
in  great  poverty  in  the  year  1784.^ 

Winston  and  Carbonneaux  were  not  the  only  ones  to  carry 
memorials  to  the  commissioners.  On  March  ist,  the  members 
of  the  French  party  sent  off  a  ten-page  petition  concerning  the 
affairs  in  the  Illinois,  in  which,  although  they  tried  to  confine 
themselves  to  claims  for  payments,  as  they  had  been  instructed 
to  do  by  the  commissioners,  they  recur  now  and  then  to  the  hard- 
ships which  they  had  endured.  At  about  the  same  time  another 
memorial,  signed  by  most  of  the  men  opposed  to  Winston,  was 
forwarded  and  in  this  was  given  in  detail  an  account  of  the  double 

1  Va.  Siate  Papers,  iii.,  327,  389;    Kas.  Rec,  Notice  and  Letter. 

2  In  his  journal  Colonel  Fleming,  one  of  the  commissioners,  is  very  outspoken  about  his 
suspicions.  {Dr.  MSS.,  2ZZ69).  From  the  same  journal  it  is  evident  that  Carbonneaux 
and  the  delegates  from  Vincennes  were  at  the  Falls  in  time  for  the  meeting  on  January  15. 
Winston  did  not  start  from  Kaskaskia  till  the  21st  of  the  month  and  the  delegate  from  Caho- 
kia, Fr.  Trottier,  left  sometime  in  March.  (See  post,  p.  145).  All  the  representatives  were 
at  Fort  Nelson  on  March  30th  and  wrote  a  letter  to  Clark  from  there.     {Dr.  MSS.,  50J80). 

3  The  deposition  of  Carbonneaux  is  obtained  from  an  extract  sent  by  Walker  Daniel  to  the 
commissioners  February  3d  in  Dr.  MSS.,  60 J3  and  Va.  State  Papers,  iii.,  430;  notice  of  Wins- 
ton's death  in  Dr.  MSS.,  4J37.  I  regret  that  I  have  been  unable  to  see  the  journal  of  this  board 
of  commissioners,  which  is  in  the  Va.  State  Lib.  Dr.  Eckenrode,  the  state  archivist,  has  fur- 
nished me  with  a  few  extracts  from  it,  but  there  was  no  way  of  finding  out  what  would  be 
of  use  to  me  except  by  having  the  three  hundred  odd  pages  copied  and  this  I  was  unable  to 
have  done. 


INTRODUCTION  cxxi 

dealing  of  the  county  lieutenant,  who  had  told  the  military  officers 
that  the  French  must  be  ruled  by  the  bayonet  while  he  was  urging 
the  French  to  oppose  further  levies ;  and  the  memorialists  further 
declared  that  Winston  was  responsible  for  the  lawless  condition 
which  prevailed  in  the  country.^ 

Those  who  had  given  freely  of  their  goods  for  the  support  of 
the  American  cause  were  never  to  receive  full  recompense  for  their 
services.  Most  of  the  bills  which  were  presented  were  finally 
paid  by  Virginia,  but  not  until  they  had  passed  into  the  hands  of 
speculators  such  as  Bentley  and  Dodge,  who  had  given  to  the 
original  holders  a  very  small  percentage  of  the  face  value  of  the 
claims.  Later  the  United  States  attempted  to  compensate  the 
French  people  for  the  losses  they  had  suffered  by  granting  them 
concessions  of  land;  but  the  delays  were  so  long,  their  needs 
so  pressing,  and  their  foresight  so  poor  that  the  men  to  whom 
the  grants  were  made  sold  them  for  a  song  to  land-jobbers  and 
speculators,  long  before  the  difficult  land  question  of  Illinois  was 
finally  settled  a  generation  after  the  occurrence  of  the  events  for 
which  the  French  and  others  had  ruined  themselves.^ 

Between  the  appearance  of  the  Virginia  commissioners  in 
January,  1783,  and  that  of  Colonel  Harmar  in  1787,  the  Illinois 
people  were  almost  completely  isolated.  On  account  of  the  de- 
struction of  the  documents  which  would  have  furnished  informa- 
tion on  the  events  of  the  period,  the  view  we  obtain  of  the  men 
and  affairs  is  a  very  hazy  one.  This,  however,  is  evident.  The 
experience  of  the  Kaskaskians  during  the  years  of  the  American 
occupation  had  uniStted  them  to  rise  to  the  dignity  of  self-govern- 
ment and  the  anarchy  only  grew  worse ;  whereas  in  Cahokia  the 
court  founded  by  Todd  remained  in  power  and  was  able  to  pre- 
serve order.  The  difference  in  the  destinies  of  the  two  villages 
can  only  be  ascribed  to  the  presence  of  the  turbulent  frontiersmen 

1  They  are  both  in  the  Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers,  the  first  an  original  MS.,  the  other  a 
copy  by  the  clerk. 

1  Atner.  State  Papers,  Pub.  Land,  passim;  Record- Books  at  Chester,  111.  When  the  United 
States  accepted  the  cession  of  the  Northwest  from  Virginia,  it  was  agreed  to  reimburse  the 
latter  for  all  claims  for  necessary  supplies  to  Clark,  provided  they  were  allowed  before  Sep- 
tember 24,  1788.  Many  bills  were  presented  and  allowed  before  that  time  (Winsor,  West- 
ward Movement,  247);  but  many  still  remained  in  the  hands  of  the  French  unpaid.  (Smith, 
St.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,  168.) 


cxxii  ILLINOIS  taSTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

in  the  southern  village;  for  the  inhabitants  of  the  villages  were 
of  the  same  origin,  and  their  experience  had  been  practically 
identical  except  for  the  few  years  of  the  Virginia  period. 

We  have  already  seen  that  many  traders  came  into  the  Illinois 
in  the  spring  of  1779  and  others  had  followed  them.  Besides 
these  several  soldiers  of  the  Virginia  line  made  permanent  settle- 
ments in  the  neighborhood.  In  the  summer  of  1779,  Montgomery 
permitted  a  number  of  families  to  settle,  "up  the  creek  about 
thirty  miles,"  and  this  probably  marks  the  date  of  the  beginning 
of  Bellefontaine,  the  first  village  of  Americans  north  of  the  Ohio 
River.^  In  1781,  after  the  abandonment  of  Fort  Jefferson,  several 
families  which  had  established  themselves  around  that  post 
came  to  Kaskaskia  and  some  two  years  later  made  a  stockade 
at  Grand  Ruisseau,  which  was  under  the  bluffs  at  the  point  where 
the  road  from  Cahokia  to  Kaskaskia  mounts  the  hills.^  The 
leading  men  in  these  settlements  were  James  Moore,  Henry 
and  Nicolas  Smith,  Shadrach  Bond,  and  Robert  Watts.  The 
number  of  Americans  scattered  on  the  bluffs,  in  the  villages,  and 
on  the  bottom  was  over  one  hundred,  most  of  whom  were  in  or 
around  Kaskaskia.^ 

If  order  was  to  be  maintained,  it  was  essential  that  these 
scattered  communities  should  be  brought  into  some  relations  with 
the  courts  of  the  French  villages.  On  July  9,  1782,  while  the 
the  justices  were  still  holding  sessions,  fourteen  of  the  Americans 
at  Bellefontaine  petitioned  the  court  at  Kaskaskia  that  they  be 
permitted  to  maintain  a  subordinate  court  in  their  village  and  that 
either  some  one  should  be  appointed  justice  of  the  peace  or  they 
should  be  allowed  to  elect  one  from  among  themselves  to  that 
office;  and  they  expressed  a  desire  to  live  under  the  laws  of  the 
county  and  to  be  united  with  the  other  villages.  This  petition  was 
granted  and  an  election  was  held,  in  which  Nicolas  Smith  received 
ten  votes  and  James  Garretson  five.     The  certificate  of  election 

1  Montgomery  to  Clark,  Dr.  MSS.,  49 J 74. 

2  Reynold,  My  Own  Times,  59. 

3  In  a  contract  with  Tardiveau  in  the  summer  of  that  year,  there  are  130  signatures  of 
Americans. 


INTRODUCTION  cxxiii 

was  written  by  James  Moore,  who  signed  himself  captain. ^  The 
organization  of  the  village  of  Grand  Ruisseau  did  not  take  place 
till  the  year  1786.  Since  it  was  in  the  district  of  Cahokia,  the 
petition  was  sent  to  the  court  sitting  in  the  village  of  that  name. 
On  January  2d  the  Americans  were  permitted  to  elect  a  comman- 
dant, subordinate  to  the  commandant  of  Cahokia,  and  to  name 
arbitrators  to  decide  disputes,  but  they  were  to  remain  subject 
to  the  jurisdiction  of  the  court.  Robert  Watts  was  appointed 
commandant.^  It  was  not  until  the  next  year  that  Grand  Ruisseau 
received  a  justice ;  but,  since  the  permission  to  elect  such  an  officer 
was  dependent  on  of  events  which  occurred  in  Kaskaskia,  the 
account  will  be  postponed  to  the  proper  place.^ 

The  submissiveness  of  the  Americans  to  the  Kaskaskia  court 
did  not  last  long  and  in  their  attempt  to  gain  the  control  of  the 
government,  after  the  abolition  of  that  body  by  Winston,  confusion 
and  disorder  reached  a  climax;  and  anarchy  was  made  more 
complete  by  the  drunkenness,  insubordination,  and  lawlessness 
of  the  French  coureur  de  hois  and  the  voyageurs. 

Affairs  were  further  complicated  by  the  presence  of  British 
merchants,  who  had  rushed  into  the  region  to  capture  the  Indian 
trade.  The  Michillimackinac  company,  which  had  a  store  at 
Cahokia,  was  particularly  conspicuous  in  this  competition.  The 
British  were  able  to  undersell  the  inhabitants  in  their  commerce 
with  the  Indians  and,  since  this  deprived  the  villagers  of  a  trade 
which  they  thought  rightfully  belonged  to  them,  it  was  the  cause 
of  several  complaints."  All  the  British  who  appeared  in  the  West 
were  not  simply  traders.  The  British  government,  which  looked 
with  covetous  eyes  on  these  rich  lands,  sent  ageilts  into  all  parts 
to  report  on  the  disposition  of  the  people.  Some  of  these,  al- 
though not  authorized  by  their  government,  openly  urged 
the  French  people  to  unite  with  England,  an  issue  out  of  their 

•  i. 

1  Kas.  Rec,  Pol.  Papers. 

2  See  post,  p.  217. 

2  See  post,  p.  cxlviii. 

^Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xxx.,  453,  xl.,  113;  Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,  174;  Edgar  to 
Clark,  Dr.  MSS.,  ssJsS- 


cxxiv  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

troubles  which  would  not  have  been  altogether  unacceptable  to 
the  lUinoisans.^ 

Over  this  turbulent  population  the  Canadian  nobleman,  Jac- 
ques Timothe  Boucher  Sieur  de  Monbreun,  had  been  appointed 
governor  by  Winston.  He  had  been  born  in  Boucherville  about 
thirty-six  years  before.  While  still  a  young  man,  he  had  sought 
his  fortune  in  the  West  and  established  himself  at  Vincennes. 
He  there  won  the  confidence  of  Lieutenant  Governor  Abbott 
during  the  latter's  short  stay  in  the  village  and  was  employed  by 
him  as  a  confidential  messenger. ^  He  had  readily  united  with 
the  people  of  Vincennes  in  acknowledging  the  sovereignty  of  Vir- 
ginia, influenced  by  the  persuasive  eloquence  of  Father  Gibault. 
He  was  appointed  lieutenant  in  the  militia  of  the  village,  and  was 
one  of  the  officers  captured  by  Hamilton,  when  the  British  retook 
the  place.^  De  Monbreun  later  enlisted  in  the  Illinois  battaHon 
and  received  the  commission  of  lieutenant,  a  position  he  held  with 
honor  until  the  fall  of  1782,  when  the  necessities  of  his  family 
compelled  him  to  ask  for  his  discharge  and  pay.  His  letters  to 
Clark  show  him  to  have  been  a  man  proud  of  his  lineage  and  with 
a  sensitiveness  in  matters  of  honor.* 

Exactly  what  his  party  affiliations  were,  previous  to  his  ap- 
pointment, it  is  impossible  to  say.  He  was  connected  by  marriage 
with  the  Bauvais  family.  He  ran  for  office  in  1782  and  received 
only  one  vote.  His  appointment  as  deputy  county  lieutenant 
would  indicate  a  close  relation  to  Winston,  particularly  as  the 
other  official  appointed  at  this  time,  the  clerk  Langlois,  is  known 
to  have  been  of  that  party;  yet  his  service  in  the  army  would 
show  some  association  with  the  military  party,  with  which 
Winston  does  not  appear  to  have  been  on  the  best  of  terms;  and 
his  later  actions  connect  him  closely  with  John  Dodge.     Every- 

1  Papers  oj  Old  Cong.,  xli.,  113;  Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,  loi;  this  vol.,  p.  571;  Mc- 
Laughlin, "The  Western  Posts  and  the  British  Debts,"  in  Annual  Report  of  Amer.  Hist. 
Assn.,  1894,  p.  413;  Winsor,  Westward  Movement,  373;  Green,  Spanish  Conspiracy,  ch. 
xviii. 

^Can.  Archives,  B.,  122,  p.  103;   Tanguay,  Diet.  Genealogiqtie,  i.,  71,  73,  ii.,  383,  388. 

3  Can.  Archives,  B  .,  122,  p.  234. 

4  Letters  and  certificates  of  De  Monbreun,  Dr.  MSS.,  51 J24-26;   50J70. 


INTRODUCTION  cxxv 

thing  considered,  it  is  probable  that  his  appointment  was  not 
favored  by  the  French  party. 

On  January  8,  1783,  Winston  issued  to  him  the  commission 
of  deputy  county  lieutenant  and  gave  him  the  following  instruc- 
tions for  his  guidance:  "On  every  occasion  that  shall  offer  to 
claim  your  protection  in  behalf  of  the  people  as  well  as  to  support 
the  cause  of  the  States,  you  will  act  in  concert  with  the  oldest 
inhabitants  in  order  to  consider  jointly  with  them  the  most  proper 
measures  to  take  concerning  the  affairs  which  may  arise. 

"  For  your  direction  I  cannot  direct  you  to  a  better  guide  than 
the  'Code  of  Laws  and  Articles  of  Right'  which  his  Excellency 
the  Governor  has  sent  and  which  ought  to  be  in  the  office  of  the 
court.  These  you  will  consult  from  time  to  time  and  mitigate 
as  much  as  possible  by  the  old  customs  and  usages  of  this  country. 
By  adding  to  this  your  knowledge  of  jurisprudence  you  cannot 
fall  into  error.  .  .  . 

"As  there  is  nothing  else  which  occurs  to  me  to  call  to  your 
attention,  I  rely  on  your  prudence  and  experience  as  to  unforeseen 
cases.  T  wish  for  you  a  better  success  in  preserving  peace  than 
I  have  had."^ 

The  wish  was  almost  ironical,  for  the  conditions  in  Kaskaskia 
were  growng  steadily  worse  rather  than  better,  and  for  this  Win- 
ston was  in  part  to  blame.  On  account  of  the  discontinuance 
of  the  sessions  of  the  court  through  Winston's  act,  the  deputy 
county  lieutenant  no  longer  had  the  moral  support  of  the  best 
citizens  for  the  preservation  of  order.  For  the  next  few  years 
De  Monbreun  was  generally  the  only  judge  and  at  times  he  is 
satisfied  to  sign  this  less  pretentious  title  to  his  name;  but  the 
petitions  were  addressed  to  him  as  county  lieutenant.  It  is  evident 
that  the  government  in  Kaskaskia  had  reverted  to  the  older 
French  type,  wherein  executive  and  judicial  functions  were 
exercised  by  one  man.  That  there  was  a  great  deal  of  judicial 
business  carried  on  is  proved  by  the  numerous  petitions  and  other 
legal  documents.  The  notary,  Langlois,  also  found  something 
to  do,  as  is  shown  by  the  inventory  of  instruments  drawn  up  by 

1  Enclosure  in  Memorial  of  Timothe  de  Monbreun,  Va.  State  Lib. 


cxxvi  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

him.  In  1783  there  were  indexed  eighty-five  titles  and  in  the 
next  year,  eighty-seven.^  In  the  year  1784,  for  a  short  time,  Aime 
Compte,  the  last  president  of  the  former  court,  reappeared  and 
styled  himself,  "judge  in  the  village  and  district  of  Kaskaskia". 
In  a  petition  of  June  16,  there  is  mention  of  "  De  Monbreun,  the 
late  commandant".  It  is  possible  that  this  marks  some  political 
upheaval  which  for  a  time  overthrew  the  deputy  heutenant. 
This  may  have  been  due  to  the  assertion  of  the  rights  of  the 
district  against  the  village,  for  Aime  Compte  was  from  Prairie  du 
Rocher;  but  if  that  is  the  explanation,  the  revolution  was  not 
successful,  for  De  Monbreun's  activities  as  governor  and  judge 
can  be  traced  up  to  the  latter  half  of  the  year  1786.^ 

Besides  attending  to  the  legal  affairs  of  the  district,  De  Mon- 
breun managed  to  maintain  peaceful  relations  with  the  Indians. 
Raids  were  becoming  more  frequent  and  dangerous  during  these 
years.  The  county  lieutenant  held  several  conferences  with  the 
savages  as  did  the  commandants  of  the  other  villages.  He  spent 
the  public  money  and  private  funds,  furnished  by  himself  and 
the  militia  officers,  to  satisfy  their  demands.  By  these  means  a 
partial  treaty  was  effected,  which  in  a  measure  protected  the 
Illinois  country.^ 

He  was  also  called  upon  to  maintain  the  honor  of  the  United 
States  against  the  infringement  of  her  rights  by  Spain.  In  1785 
two  deserters  from  St.  Louis  took  refuge  in  American  Illinois. 
Cruzat,  the  commandant  of  St.  Louis,  seized  these  upon  the  soil 
of  the  LTnited  States  and  carried  them  back  to  the  Spanish  village. 
The  action  of  De  Monbreun  in  the  case  shows  him  at  his  best. 
In  a  very  dignified  letter,  dated  October  12th,  he  pointed  out  to 
the  Spanish  governor  of  New  Orleans  the  illegality  of  the  act 
and  the  insult  which  had  been  offered  to  the  United  States.'* 
On  the  whole,  however,  the  relations  between  the  officials  of  the 
Spanish  possessions  and  those  of  the  Illinois  were  most  friendly. 

1  Kas.  Rec,  Inventory. 

^  Kas.  Rec,  Petitions;    Amer.  Stale  Papers,  Pub.  Lands,  ii.,  206. 

3  Memorial  of  De  Monbreun,  Va.  State  Lib.;  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  315.  In 
this  last  the  date  has  been  transcribed  incorrectly  or  some  other  error  has  been  made,  for  De 
Monbreun  had  no  civil  office  in  February,  1782. 

*  Memorial  of  De  Monbreun,  Va.  State  Lib. 


INTRODUCTION  cxxvii 

Many  letters  passed  between  them  on  a  variety  of  subjects, 
generally  of  a  legal  character.  In  fact,  it  was  the  policy  of  Spain 
at  this  time  to  propitiate  the  French  and  the  Americans  of  the 
West,  in  order  to  persuade  them  either  to  revolt  against  the 
United  States  and  unite  with  the  Spanish  colonies  or  to  emigrate 
to  the  western  bank.  There  has  been  preserved  an  interesting 
letter,  the  motive  of  which  must  be  found  in  this  policy.  Shortly 
before  the  episode  of  the  Spanish  deserters,  Cruzat  wrote  to  De 
Monbreun  that  the  merchants  of  American  Illinois  might  have 
the  protection  of  the  Spanish  convoy  in  sending  down  their  mer- 
chandise to  New  Orleans.^ 

Where  De  Monbreun  failed  in  his  government  was  where  Todd 
and  Winston  had  failed  before  him,  namely  in  preserving  peace 
between  the  factions.  In  his  memorial  to  Virginia  he  has  re- 
corded the  policy  which  he  adopted,  "  in  quieting  the  animosities 
between  the  French  Natives  and  American  Settlers."  He  writes : 
"Without  troops  to  oppose  the  hostile  designs  of  the  savages, 
without  any  coercive  means  to  keep  under  subjection  a  country 
where  a  number  of  restless  spirits  were  exciting  commotions  and 
troubles,  the  greater  circumspection  and  management  became 
necessary,  and  the  Commandant  was  induced  to  temporize  with 
all  parties  in  order  to  preserve  tranquillity,  peace,  and  harmony 
in  the  country."^ 

The  temporizing  of  De  Monbreun  meant  that  he  permitted 
the  American  settlers,  who  had  found  in  John  Dodge  a  leader  of 
force  and  ability,  to  control  the  village.  These  men  understood 
better  than  the  French  the  anomalous  position  of  Illinois — no  longer 
a  part  of  Virginia  and  not  yet  under  the  control  of  the  United  States 
—  and  took  advantage  of  it.  Many  of  them  had  obtained  con- 
cessions of  land  from  the  court  and  many  more  from  De  Mon- 
breun, who  was  particularly  free-handed  in  making  grants.^  It 
is  very  probable  that  the  Kaskaskia  government  was  not  strong 
enough  to  deny  or  limit  such  concessions.     A  good  example  of 

1  Memorial  of  De  Monbreun,  Va.  State  Lib . 

2  Ibid. 

3  Smith,  Si.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,  169. 


cxxviii        ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

the  illegal  occupation  of  land  is  ofifered  by  the  case  of  this  same 
John  Dodge.  He  seized  the  old  French  fort  on  the  bluffs,  and 
fortified  it  with  building  materials  and  two  cannon  from  the 
Jesuit  building,  known  as  Fort  Clark,  and  was  prepared  from 
this  vantage  ground  to  defy  what  was  left  of  the  civil  government 
in  the  village ;  for  the  site  commanded  the  defenseless  community 
below.^  For  this  seizure  of  public  property  there  was  not  the 
slightest  authority,  but  no  one  dared  to  oppose  the  act.  Dodge 
was  so  audacious  and  the  fort  so  favorably  situated  that  his 
influence  was  unquestioned  in  the  village,  and  both  the  deputy 
county  lieutenant  and  the  people  were  compelled  to  do  his  bidding.^ 
He  was  far  more  successful  than  Winston  in  building  up  a  party 
among  the  French  by  persuasion  and  intimidation.  One  of  the 
former  judges,  Nicolas  Lachance,  became  his  chief  supporter,  and 
several  of  the  others  appeared  ready  to  follow  his  lead.  From 
the  gHmpses  we  obtain  of  the  French  people,  they  appear  to  have 
acknowledged  the  supremacy  of  the  strongest  and  to  have  cringed 
in  a  most  unmanly  manner  before  the  energetic  American,  or  as 
a  writer  to  Congress  at  a  later  time  says:  "But  seeing  they 
could  not  give  any  information  of  their  unfortunate  condition 
and  consequently  obtain  any  redress,  they  began  the  most  shame- 
full  slavery,  by  flattering  their  Tyrant  and  serving  him  in  the 
most  humiliating  manner."^  Dodge,  in  turn,  bullied  the  people, 
struck  them  with  his  sword,  insulted  them,  and  fought  with  them.'' 

'  ,*  '^Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xlviii.,  19;  this  vol.,  p.  569.  The  occupation  of  the  fort  on  the 
bluffs  by  Dodge  caused  the  old  fort  in  the  Jesuit  building,  which  was  known  as  Fort  Gage 
under  the  British  and  Fort  Clark  under  the  Virginians,  to  be  forgotten,  and  the  villagers 
came  to  speak  of  the  former  as  the  fort,  so  that  men  like  Mann  Butler  and  John  Reynolds, 
coming  later  to  Kaskaskia,  supposed  that  it  was  the  Fort  Gage  captured  by  Clark  in  1778 
and  thus  caused  a  controversy,  curious  if  not  very  profitable,  over  the  site  of  the  fort  and 
Clark's  maneuvers.  (Butler,  Hist.  of.  Kentucky,  52;  Reynolds,  Pioneer  Hist.,  72;  for 
the  history  of  controversy,  see  Winsor,  Nar.  and  Crit.  Hist.,  vi.,  719,  note  i.) 

^Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xxx.,  463;   xlviii.,  19. 

3  Ibid,  xlviii.,  13. 

*  The  fullest  information  in  regard  to  Dodge  is  contained  in  the  petitions  to  Congress  of 
the  year  1787.  These  were  written  by  that  faction  of  the  French  party  which  remained  un- 
reconciled after  the  visit  to  Kaskaskia  of  Colonel  Harmar.  (See  Post,  p.  cxxxvii.)  The  writers 
were  Father  de  la  Vahniere  and  the  clerk,  Pierre  Langlois.  They  exhibit  such  hostility  and 
animosity  against  Dodge  that  their  testimony  should  be  suspected,  were  not  some  of  the 
facts  mentioned  by  them  supported  by  other  witnesses.  Governor  St.  Clair  wrote  in  1790 
that:  "The  Illinois  regiment  being  disbanded  a  set  of  men  pretending  the  authority  of 
Virginia,  embodied  themselves  and  a  scene  of  general  depdreation  and  plunder  ensued." 
{Amer.  Slate  Papers,  Pub.  Lands,  i.,  20.)  The  whole  French  party  united  on  June  2,  1786, 
in  a  petition  to  Congress  in  which  they  made  charges  against  Dodge  similar  to  those  of  De 


INTRODUCTION  cxxix 

The  people  found  difficulty  in  making  their  condition  known ; 
for  Dodge  was  powerful  and  had  many  friends,  so  that  his  story 
was  generally  believed.  He  himself  drew  up  a  petition  to  Congress 
in  June,  1784,  asking  that  Illinois  be  created  an  independent 
state,  and  found  seventeen  French  inhabitants  to  sign  it,  most 
of  whom  belonged  to  the  least  intelligent  of  the  community; 
eight  were  unable  to  sign  their  names,  one  was  a  woman,  and  of 
the  other  eight,  only  four  had  held  office.  They  were  not  even 
all  from  Kaskaskia;  one  was  an  inhabitant  of  Vincennes,  and 
the  names  of  several  of  the  others  do  not  appear  in  any  Hst  of 
French  inhabitants  of  the  Illinois.  The  other  signatures  were 
those  of  Americans.^  The  French  party,  a  few  months  later, 
appointed  Major  Lebrun  called  Belcour  to  present  their  griev- 
ances to  Congress.  Petitions  were  prepared  in  both  Cahokia 
and  Kaskaskia,  but  Dodge  "  prophetsyed,  concerning  him,  be 
certain  he  shall  never  bear  the  west  coat  that  he  asketh. "  This 
prophesy  was  fulfilled,  for  the  bearer  of  the  petitions  was  killed 
on  his  way  east  near  the  Falls  of  the  Ohio.^  A  copy  of  the  peti- 
tion from  Cahokia  finally  reached  Congress,  but  not  until  it  had 
been  somewhat  disguised  and  changed.^ 

Dodge  maintained  his  ascendency  in  the  village  until  1786, 
in  which  year  the  inhabitants  became  thoroughly  aroused  and 
finally  succeeded  in  overthrowing  this  representative  of  "Greek 
tyranny."  The  initial  impetus  to  this  action  probably  came 
from  George  Rogers  Clark,  who  had  always  entertained  a  poor 
opinion  of  Dodge.  In  a  letter  he  wrote  to  Congress  in  May, 
recommending    that   body   to   estabhsh   a   government   in   the 


la  Valiniere  but  without  so  many  details.  (Papers  of  Qld  Cong.,  xli.,  1 13 ;  see  post,  p.  cxxx)  In 
the  placard  of  Commissioner  Janis  (See  post,  p.  495)  there  is  an  unmistakable  reference  to  the 
seizure  of  building  material  from  Fort  Clark.  In  the  record  of  the  court  held  by  De  Mon- 
breun  the  influence  of  Dodge  is  very  evident  and  that  in  a  case  mentioned  by  De  la  Valiniere. 
(Kas.  Rec,  Court  Record).  Several  papers  in  a  suit  brought  by  Madame  Bentley  against  Dodge, 
give  witness  of  his  violence.  {Kas.  Rec.)  There  should  be  added  to  these  the  succession  of 
events  which  occurred  after  the  departure  of  Dodge  and  his  later  attack  on  John  Edgar.  (See 
post,  p.  cxlii.)  For  these  reasons  it  seems  proper  to  accept  the  testimony  of  the  leaders  of  the 
smaller  faction  as  that  which  would  have  been  given  by  the  prominent  Frenchmen  at  an 
earlier  date,  had  they  had  occasion  to  write  about  the  same  events. 

*  Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xxx.,  435. 

^  Ibid,  xlviii.,  19. 

3  See  post,  pp.  567  et  seq. 


cxxx  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Illinois,  he  says  that  he  had  advised  the  French  to  revive 
their  former  magistracy.^  There  is  nothing  to  show,  however,  that 
any  steps  were  taken  in  Kaskaskia  at  that  time ;  but  an  opportunity 
was  afforded  shortly  afterwards  by  the  presence  of  Joseph  Parker 
to  send  a  communication  to  Congress.^  On  the  2nd  of  June  a  very 
earnest  petition  was  drawn  up  asking  for  an  immediate  govern- 
ment, because  of  the  wrongs  the  inhabitants  were  suffering  from 
the  British  merchants,  who  threatened  to  take  the  country  under 
the  law  of  that  nation,  and  who  were  supported  by  John  Dodge 
and  Nicolas  Lachance.  These  last  had  made  themselves  com- 
mandants and  were  acting  most  tyrannically.^  With  this  petition 
they  sent  a  copy  of  the  one  which  had  been  written  by  the  Caho- 
kians  in  1784,  but  which  had  never  reached  its  destination.  This 
was  now  somewhat  altered  so  as  to  give  it  the  appearance  of 
being  also  directed  against  Dodge.^ 

The  petition  from  the  French  party  was  read  in  Congress  on  the 
23d  of  August  and  caused  that  body  to  change  its  action,  after 
it  had  supposed  that  two  petitions  from  the  French  had  already 
been  considered.  The  first  had  been  presented  by  Carbonneaux, 
former  clerk  and  follower  of  Richard  Winston,  and  had  asked  for 
some  one  with  powers  to  govern;^  the  second  was  the  petition 
prepared  by  Dodge  on  June  22,  1784,  which,  being  accompanied 
by  a  letter  from  the  county  lieutenant,  De  Monbreun,  had  an 
official  appearance.  Action  had  been  taken  on  these  two  in 
February  and  March,  1785,  and  it  had  been  decided  to  send  a 
commissioner  to  investigate  titles,  to  have  magistrates  elected,  and 
to  reform  the  militia;  but  for  some  reason  no  commissioner  was 
sent.®  On  December  28, 1 788,  three  years  later,  the  secretary  called 
the  attention  of  Congress  to  this  omission,  but  the  needs,  for 
which  the  commissioner  was  to  have  been  appointed,  had  already 

1  Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  Ivi.,  279. 

2  I  have  found  nothing  concerning  Parker. 

3  Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xli.,  113. 
*  See  post,  p.  569. 

5  Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xxx.,  453.  .  ^ 

*>  Ibid,  xxx,  431.,  483 


INTRODUCTION  cxxxi 

been  supplied  by  the  ordinance  of  1787  and  the  appointment  of 
Governor  St.   Clair.^ 

Upon  the  receipt  of  this  third  petition,  Congress  instructed 
its  secretary  to  inform  the  inhabitants  that  "  Congress  have  un- 
der their  consideration  the  plan  of  a  temporary  government  and 
that  its  adoption  would  not  be  longer  protracted  than  the  import- 
ance of  the  subject  and  a  due  regard  to  their  interest  may 
require."  ^  In  accordance  with  instructions  the  secretary  sent  the 
message,  employing  as  messenger  the  same  Parker  by  whom  the 
Kaskaskians  had  sent  their  petition. 

During  this  critical  period  the  French  party  received  an  impor- 
tant addition.  For  some  years  the  only  priest  in  the  region  had 
been  Father  Gibault,  whose  assistance  to  Clark  has  made  his  name 
so  well  known  in  the  West.  He  had  taken  up  his  permanent 
residence  in  Vincennes,  and  therefore  the  churches  in  the 
American  Bottom  were  neglected.^  Gibault  had  been  sent  by  the 
bishop  of  Quebec,  and  his  right  to  exercise  his  duties  still  rested 
on  that  earlier  appointment.  But  now  the  Catholic  Church  of 
the  United  States  had  received  a  head  in  the  person  of  the  Prefect- 
Apostolic  John  Carroll,  whose  jurisdiction  was  extended  to  the 
Mississippi  valley.  The  first  priest  sent  by  him  to  this  district 
was  the  wandering  Carmelite,  Father  St.  Pierre,  who  undertook 
the  charge  of  the  parish  in  Cahokia  in  1785  and  continued  there 
until  1789.*  Sometime  in  the  summer  of  1786  the  Rev.  Pierre 
Huet  de  la  Valiniere  arrived  at  Kaskaskia  with  an  appointment 
as  vicar  general  of  the  Illinois.^  He  was  the  kind  of  man  needed 
to  draw  the  French  out  of  the  stupid  timidity  into  which  they  had 

^  Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  clxxx.,  ii. 

^Journals  of  Congress,  iv.,  688. 

3  Shea,  Archbishop  Carroll,  469. 

*  Ibid,  272;  this  volume,  pp.  630,  n.  78,  259,  269,  393. 

6  Amer.  Cath.  Hist.  Researches,  New  Ser.,  ii.,  No.  3.  In  this  magazine  the  editor,  Mr. 
Griffin,  has  published  the  most  important  papers  on  the  life  of  De  la  Valiniere,  where  may 
be  found  the  various  disputes  between  him  and  the  other  priests.  It  is  impossible  to  dis- 
cuss them  here,  but  Gibault  claimed  to  be  vicar  general  under  his  appointment  by  the  bishop 
of  Quebec  and  was  unwilling  to  acknowledge  the  superiority  of  the  new  appointee.  The 
matter  was  peaceably  adjusted  by  the  Canadian  bishop  withdrawing  his  jurisdiction  from 
this  region.  (Shea,  Archbishop  Carroll,  466.)  De  la  Valiniere  entered  into  a  dispute  with 
Father  St.  Pierre  also,  but  the  latter  was  supported  by  the  Cahokians,  who  appealed  to  the 
bishop  of  Quebec. 


cxxxii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

fallen.  By  nature  he  was  impulsive  and  erratic,  but  full  of  en- 
thusiasm for  any  cause  to  which  he  had  given  himself.  In  the 
year  1779  he  had  been  expelled  from  Canada  for  his  open  espousal 
of  the  American  cause  ;^  later  he  came  to  the  United  States  and 
served  at  Philadelphia  and  at  New  York.  He  was  now  sent  to 
a  region  where  his  peculiar  talents  would  have  an  immediate 
effect,  and,  since  the  French  regarded  him  as  a  representative  of 
the  United  States,  to  which  the  Illinois  now  belonged,  his  advice 
carried  great  weight.^  It  was  undoubtedly  his  example  and 
inspiration  that  encouraged  the  French  to  continue  their  resis- 
tance to  the  tyranny  of  Dodge. 

Before  the  return  of  the  messenger  who  had  carried  their 
petition  to  Congress  the  French  people  had  themselves  taken  steps 
to  gain  control  of  their  civil  government.  They  first  brought 
about,  in  July,  the  appointment  of  Maturin  BoUvet  of  St.  Philippe 
as  civil  and  criminal  judge.  On  August  14th  Timothe  de  Mon- 
breun,  who  had  supported  Dodge,  resigned  his  office  of  deputy 
county  Heutenant  and  appointed  in  his  place  a  man  who  had 
consistently  supported  the  French  party,  Jean  Baptiste  Barbau 
of  Prairie  du  Rocher.^  It  is  noticeable  that  neither  of  the  two 
newly  appointed  officers  was  a  Kaskaskian. 

Barbau  was  a  man  well  advanced  in  years,  when  he  was  called 
upon  to  lead  the  French  in  their  struggle  for  political  liberty. 
In  1746,  when  he  married  his  first  wife,  he  was  over  twenty-five, 
so  that  in  the  year  1786  he  must  have  passed  his  sixty-fifth 
birthday.  His  parents  were  not  Canadians,  but  had  come  directly 
from  France  to  New  Orleans,  where  he  was  probably  born.^ 

The  long  expected  reply  from  Congress  was  brought  to  Kas- 
kaskia  by  Joseph  Parker  in  January,  1787.  The  people  were 
eager  to  learn  its  contents,  and  sent  in  haste  to  Barbau  at  Prairie 

1  Hald.  to  Bish.  of  Quebec,  Can.  Archives,  B.,  66,  i6i. 

2  Shea,  Archbishop  Carroll,  145;   Amer.  Cath.  Hist.  Researches,  New  Ser.,  ii..  No.  3. 

3  Kas.  Rec,  Petitions;  Memorial, of  De  Monbreun,  Va.  State  Lib.  De  Monbreun  remained 
only  a  short  time  in  Kaskaskia  after  laying  down  his  office.  The  records  show  him  still 
there  in  1787,  but  after  that  he  appears  no  more.  He  went  to  Tennessee  and  at  an  advanced 
age  died  in  Nashville  in  1826.  He  had  accumulated  considerable  property  which  he  left  to 
his  children.    (Chester  Probate  Records,  March  19,  1827,  Randolph  County.) 

*  Marriage  contract,  Cah.  Rec.  in,  Belleville,  111. 


INTRODUCTION  cxxxiii 

du  Rocher  that  he  might  come  and  open  it.  But  the  deputy 
county  lieutenant  being  ill  and  unable  to  come  gave  his  permis- 
sion to  the  clerk  to  read  the  communication  to  the  inhabitants.^ 
There  must  have  been  some  disappointment  felt  when  they  heard 
that  the  government  for  which  they  had  so  ardently  hoped  was 
not  yet  to  be  established,  but  was  still  to  be  determined  upon. 
However,  they  had  succeeded  in  communicating  with  Congress, 
which  was  some  consolation. 

At  almost  the  same  time  an  emissary  appeared  from  a  dififerent 
quarter.  George  Rogers  Clark  had,  during  the  fall  of  the  pre- 
vious year,  led  a  force  of  Kentucky  militiamen,  without  the  au- 
thority of  the  United  States,  against  the  Indians  in  the  Northwest 
territory.  He  then  decided  to  garrison  Vincennes,  and  now  sent 
John  Rice  Jones  to  buy  provisions  in  the  Illinois,  where  some  of 
the  merchants  had  promised  him  assistance.^  The  name  of 
Clark  had  always  been  honored  by  the  French,  for  they  still 
remembered  the  kind  but  firm  rule  they  had  enjoyed  during  that 
year  when  he  held  not  only  the  military  but  the  civil  authority. 
They  were  therefore  easily  persuaded  that  Clark  and  this  agent 
represented  the  United  States.  Jones  was  well  received  and  his 
purchases  were  guaranteed  by  a  prominent  American  merchant, 
John  Edgar,  whose  relations  with  the  French  were  far  more 
kindly  than  those  of  his  fellow  countrymen.^ 

Dodge,  who  had  never  forgiven  Clark  for  his  suspicions,  and 

iThe  letter  from  Barbau  is  torn  so  that  there  remains"  of  the  date  only  the  year  and 
"anvier."    Kas.  Rec,  Letters. 

2  For  the  expedition  of  Clark  see  Winsor,  Westward  Movement,  275  et.  seq.;  Secret  Jour- 
nals of  Cong.,  iv.,  313,  but  see  also  pp.  301  et  seq. 

3  Papers  of  Qld  Cong.,  xlviii.,  19.  John  Edgar  was  born  in  Belfast,  Ireland,  of  Scotch- 
Irish  parents.  During  the  years  1772-1775,  he  commanded  a  British  vessel  on  Lakes  Huron 
and  Erie.  Heathen  went  into  business  at  Detroit,  where  he  was  an-ested  on  August  24,  1778, 
for  corresponding  with  the  Americans,  and  remained  in  prison  until  1781,  when  he  escaped. 
He  had  learned  while  in  prison  of  the  treasonable  correspondence  of  the  Vermonters  with  the 
British  government  and  by  giving  information  concerning  it  won  the  confidence  of  Wash- 
ington, George  Clinton,  and  Congress.  In  1784  he  went  to  Kaskaskia  to  establish  himself 
in  trade.  The  trying  years  which  followed  almost  drove  him  to  cross  to  the  Spanish  bank; 
but  with  the  coming  of  Governor  St.  Clair  conditions  became  better  and  he  was  appointed 
to  important  positions  under  the  new  government.  For  twenty-five  years  he  held  the  office 
of  justice  of  the  Court  of  Common  Pleas.  During  this  time  he  purchased  many  of  the  land 
claims  of  the  French  for  a  few  dollars  and  in  the  course  of  years  became  the  richest  land 
owner  of  the  American  Bottom.  In  1798  Congress  voted  him  2240  acres  of  land  in  considera- 
tion of  his  losses  in  Canada  during  the  Revolutionary  War.  He  died  in  1830.  Roberts, 
Life  and  Times  of  General  John  Edgar,  Address  in  MS.  to  be  printed  in  Transactions  of  111. 
Hist.  Soc,  for  1907;  Amer.  State  Papers,  Pub.  Lands,  passim;  see  post,  p.  cxlii.  et  seq. 


cxxxiv         ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

who,  in  this  case,  had  right  on  his  side,  since  Clark  was  acting 
in  a  most  illegal  manner  in  invading  the  territory  of  the  United 
States,  opposed  the  collection  of  supplies  by  Jones  and  was 
powerful  enough  to  prevent  any  sales.  Jones  went  to  Vincennes, 
however,  and  returned  with  troops.  The  narrator's  account  of 
what  then  occurred  is  interesting.  "Mr  Jones  seemed  a  fine 
gentleman  who  caused  no  hurt  to  any  body,  but  entered  in  the 
above  said  fort  on  the  hill  occupied  by  John  Dodge,  he 
threatened  him  to  cast  him  out  from  it  if  he  continued  to  be  con- 
trary to  America,  as  he  was  before,  he  stood  there  some  days 
with  his  troops,  during  which  time  the  wheat  had  been  delivered 
peaceably  and  no  body  has  been  hurted."^ 

With  the  rising  anger  of  the  French  and  the  promised  assist- 
ance of  Clark,  Dodge  began  to  feel  that  his  position  was  becoming 
a  dangerous  one.  He  therefore  collected  his  property  and  some- 
time in  the  spring  crossed  to  the  Spanish  side,  leaving  a  farmer 
to  guard  the  fort  and  such  of  his  possessions  as  he  left  there. 

With  the  departure  of  Dodge  all  difficulties  were  by  no  means 
overcome.  Since  the  expected  authority  from  Congress  to  form  a 
government  did  not  arrive,  the  people  began  to  clamor  for  some 
immediate  form  of  judiciary,  and  they  naturally  turned  to  the 
government  which  had  been  established  by  John  Todd.  They 
knew  no  other  nor  was  there  any  semblance  of  legality  to  be  found 
except  in  the  revival  of  their  former  civil  organization.  The 
final  decision  to  revive  the  court  came  from  the  people  and  not 
from  the  county  lieutenant,  who,  however,  when  consulted  gave 
his  unqualified  approval.^ 

The  clamors  of  the  Americans,  who  numbered  over  one  hun- 
dred, were  heeded  in  this  new  establishment  and  they  were  given 
the  franchise.  Unfortunately  for  the  French  party  the  new- 
comers were  more  familiar  with  the  use  of  the  ballot,  and  by  con- 
centrating their  votes  were  able  to  elect  three  of  their  own  number 
to  office.  These  were  Henry  Smith,  John  McElduff ,  and  Thomas 
Hughes.     The    other    three    candidates    elected    were    Antoine 

1  De  la  Valiniere  in  Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xlviii.,  19. 

2  Barbau  to  Langlois,  May  2,  Kas.  Rec,  Letters. 


INTRODUCTION  cxxxv 

Bauvais,  Francois  Corset,  and  J.  Bte.  Bauvais.*  These  last  had 
all  held  office  before.  Henry  Smith  was  made  president  of  the 
court.  He  was  about  fifty  years  old,  and  had  come  from  Virginia 
to  Illinois  in  1780  and  settled  at  Bellefontaine. 

The  first  session  was  held  on  June  5,  1787,  probably  without 
the  presence  of  the  French  justices,  who  were  not  willing  to  admit 
Americans  to  the  bench.  At  this  session  no  business  was  trans- 
acted.^ On  the  7th  of  July  the  French  justices  posted  on  the 
door  of  the  church  a  memorial  addressed  to  the  people,  in  which 
they  set  forth  their  objections  to  serving  on  the  same  bench  with 
the  Americans.  The  chief  difficulties  they  raised  were  the  im- 
possibility of  the  American  and  French  judges  understanding 
each  other  and  the  hopelessness  of  finding  an  interpreter  capable 
of  successfully  performing  his  duties.  The  protest  contained 
their  definitive  decision,  and  the  two  parties  were  compelled  to 
separate.  The  result  was  that  the  Americans  outside  the  village 
were  turned  adrift,  and  Bellefontaine,  from  this  time,  ceased  to 
belong  to  the  Kaskaskia  district.^  An  agreement  was  drawn  up 
the  day  after  the  protest,  in  which  the  signers  promised  that  the 
court  should  remain  French  as  it  had  been  constituted  by  John 
Todd,  and  that  the  Frenchmen  receiving  the  next  largest  number 
of  votes  should  be  added  to  the  list  of  judges.  These  were  Vitale 
Bauvais,  Nicolas  Lachance,  and  Louis  Brazeau.  The  number 
of  signatures  was  not  large,  but  the  presence  of  John  Edgar's 
name  gave  some  promise  that  his  influence  would  be  thrown  on 
the  side  of  peace.*    The  presence  of  the  three  members  of  the 

1  Certificate  of  election  by  Barbau,  Kas.  Rec.  I  prefer  to  explain  the  composition  of 
the  court  as  above  rather  than  to  regard  it  as  the  result  of  agreement,  because  tne  protest, 
of  the  French  justices,  noted  below,  would  have  been  made  before  rather  than  after  the  elec- 
tion, if  there  had  been  any  agreement  to  divide  the  court  between  the  two  classes  of  inhabit- 
ants. 

2  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  308;  Kas.,  Rec,  Petitions.  The  government  thus 
revived  is  probably  the  one  to  which  Colonel  Harmar  refers,  when  he  writes:  "There  have 
been  some  imposters  before  Congress  particularly  one  Parker,  a  whining,  canting  Methodist, 
a  kind  of  would  be  governor."  (Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,  35.)  In  a  petition  to  Congress 
written  by  Tardiveau,  who  favored  the  American  party  in  the  Illinois,  it  is  said:  "That  a 
simple  report  of  a  committee  of  Congress  recommending  the  situation  of  the  Illinois  country 
has  been  by  some  designing  persons  palmed  upon  them  for  a  frame  of  government  actually 

~  Old  ~ 


established."     Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xlviii.,  209. 
^  See  post,  p.  cx\v\u.;  InMsiSon,  John  Todd'i 
attended  by  several  Americans  from  Bellefontaine.    They  were  probably  called  in  on  account 


See  post,  p.  cxl\'iii.;  In  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  312,  there  appears  a  jury  trial 
ded  by  several  Americans  from  Bellefontaine.    They  were  probably  called  ' 
of  an  insufficiency  of  Americans  in  the  village  to  form  a  jury. 


*  Both  papers  in  Kas.  Rec.    The  record  of  the  sessions  of  this  court  may  be  found  in  the 
back  of  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  308  et  seq. 


cxxxvi  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Bauvais  family  among  the  justices  may  be  explained  by  the  fact 
that  few  important  French  families  had  remained  in  Kaskaskia 
during  these  trying  years,  for  the  majority  had  preferred  to  seek 
refuge  under  the  Spanish  government. 

The  question  of  the  court  had  hardly  been  settled,  when  Col- 
onel Harmar,  who  commanded  in  the  Northwest,  appeared  in  the 
village  with  some  United  States  troops.  He  had  been  sent  to 
the  Illinois  to  make  a  general  inspection  of  conditions,  particu- 
larly to  put  an  end  to  the  anarchy  at  Vincennes  due  to  Clark's 
garrison,  and  arrived  at  Kaskaskia  on  the  17th  of  August.^  He 
was  accompanied  by  Barthdlemi  Tardiveau,  a  French  mercantile 
adventurer,  who  had  had  relations  with  the  Kentucky  separa- 
tists ^  and  was  a  personal  friend  of  John  Dodge,  with  whose  bro- 
ther he  had  lived  at  the  Falls  of  the  Ohio.^  Tardiveau  had  very 
little  knowledge  of  the  conditions  existing  in  the  Illinois  other 
than  what  he  had  learned  from  the  Dodges;  but  Harmar  was 
persuaded  that  he  was  the  best  informed  man  in  the  country  and 
made  him  his  interpreter  and  chief  adviser.^  Dodge  returned 
to  his  fort  above  Kaskaskia  where  he  entertained  the  colonel, 
whose  associates  from  this  time  were  almost  exclusively  members  of 
the  Dodge  party.  Even  after  Harmar  had  visited  the  orderly 
village  of  Cahokia,  his  opinion  of  the  French  still  remained  some- 
what affected  by  the  influence  of  these  men,  so  that  he  reported: 
"  I  have  to  remark  that  all  these  people  are  entirely  unacquainted 
with  what  the  Americans  call  liberty.  Trial  by  jury  etc.  they  are 
strangers  to.     A  commandant  with  a  few  troops  to  give  them 

1  Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,  22,  note,  30  et  seq. 

2  Roosevelt,  Winning  of  the  West,  pt.  v.,  ch.  i.  I  have  found  several  notices  of  Tardiveau 
to  prove  his  importance  in  the  development  of  the  West,  but  such  notices  are  so  disconnected 
that  almost  nothing  can  be  said  of  his  hfe.  He  lived  for  a  time  in  Holland  and  was  later  engaged 
in  the  fur  trade  at  Louisville,  before  1786.  His  influence  with  Governor  St.  Clair  was  as  great 
as  with  Harmar,  and  he  was  appointed  colonel  of  miUtia  and  judge  of  probate  of  St.  Clair 
County.  (Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii .,  165.)  He  evidently  did  not  remain  long  on  the  American 
side,  for  he  was  shortly  afterwards  at  New  Madrid  and  engaged  in  the  Mississippi  trade  with 
Pierre  Menard  and  others.  This  enterprise  failed.  (Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers.)  In  1703, 
he  was  associated  with  Genet's  scheme  and  was  appointed  chief  interpreter.  He  died  before 
1800. 

8  Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xlviii.,  13. 

*  Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,  31,  35. 


INTRODUCTION  cxxxvii 

orders  is  the  best  form  of  government  for  them ;  it  is  what  they 
have  been  accustomed  to."  * 

Although  the  majority  of  the  French  were  ready  to  accept 
without  question  any  disposition  that  might  be  made  of  them, 
some  members  of  their  party  were  by  no  means  satisfied  with  the 
course  of  events.  The  leader  of  this  faction  was  the  Vicar  General 
Huet  de  la  Valiniere.  His  most  important  follower  was  the 
clerk,  Pierre  Langlois,  who  had  been  an  adherent  of  Richard 
Winston  and  was  an  irreconcilable  enemy  of  John  Dodge.  The 
priest,  however,  had  lost  all  influence  over  the  French  by  his  own 
tyrannical  methods.  His  was  a  nature  to  make  enemies,  and 
during  the  past  year  by  his  close  adherence  to  the  canonical  law 
and  his  harsh  and  personal  attacks  in  his  sermons  against  individ- 
uals he  had  managed  to  stir  up  every  community  of  the  American 
Bottom  against  him.^  He  and  his  associates  were  not  willing  to 
give  up  the  old  issues  against  the  Americans,  and  were  particularly 
exasperated  that  Tardiveau,  a  friend  of  John  Dodge,  should  be 
the  spokesman  for  the  villagers ;  for  said  they,  "  that  frenchman 
who  speaketh  easily  the  English  language  is  come  lately  here  with 
Col.  Harmar  whom  he  inspired  with  sentiments  very  different  from 
those  which  we  could  expect  from  a  gentleman  in  his  place.  He 
deceived  him  in  their  way  as  he  was  himself  deceived.  He  made 
him  stay,  live  and  dwell  only  in  the  houses  of  friends  of  Dodge,  he 
accompanied  him  everywhere  like  his  interpreter,  but  he  could 
not  show  him  the  truth  being  himself  ignorant  of  it,  he  gave 
allways  an  evil  idea  to  every  word  proceeding  from  those  who 
Dodge  thought  to  be  his  enemies."  ^  Tardiveau  could  not  ignore 
this  attack  and  declared  that  Langlois  was  opposed  to  any  change 
in  the  regulations  made  by  Todd.  To  justify  himself  Langlois, 
accompanied  by  the  priest,  presented  himself  before  Colonel 
Harmar  and  said :  "  We  desire  and  expect  every  day  one  regula- 
tion from  the  honl  Congress,  but  now  till  it  may  come,  having  none, 

^  Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,  32.  A  further  proof  of  the  influence  of  Dodge  is  given  by 
Harmar's  unfavorable  opinion  of  Parker,  who  had  carried  the  message  of  the  French  party  to 
Congress.  Harmar  writes  that  he  was  very  "unpopular  and  despised  by  the  inhabitants." 
(Ibid,  ii.,  35.) 

2  See  papers  printed  in  Amer.  Cdth.  Hist.  Researches,  New  Ser.,  ii.,  No.  3. 

8  Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xlviii.,  19 


cxxxviii       ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

we  did  by  common  consent  aggree  to  keep  the  same  brought  by 
Mr  Todd,  till  the  other  may  come,  and  Mr  Tardiveau  would  do 
better  to  deceive  not  others  as  he  is  deceived  himself."  The  narra- 
tive continues :  "Afterward  the  same  Mr  Langlois  having  shown 
the  above  said  proofs  against  John  Dodge  who  was  present,  the 
said  Dodge  was  so  much  angry  that  in  the  presence  of  the  Lieu- 
tenant Makidoul  [Ensign  McDowell]  with  several  others  in  the 
yard  he  did  cast  himself  upon  the  said  Mr  Langlois  and  putting 
his  fingers  in  his  eyes  and  hair  he  would  have  made  him  blind, 
if  the  officer  had  not  cryed  against  him."^ 

Harmar  did  not  care  to  become  mixed  up  in  the  local  quarrel, 
which  he  probably  regarded  as  beneath  his  notice,  and  gave  his 
support  to  the  government  which  had  been  established,  so  far  as 
to  tell  the  inhabitants  to  obey  their  magistrates.^  Dodge,  how- 
ever, felt  that  the  victory  belonged  to  him,  and  after  the  departure 
of  the  troops  assembled  his  friends  in  his  fort  and  "fyred  four 
times  each  of  his  great  canons,  beating  the  drums  etc." 

Harmar  brought  discouraging  news  to  the  American  settlers, 
who  had  received  land  grants  from  the  deputy  county  lieu- 
tenants and  courts.  They  were  informed  that  such  titles  had 
no  legal  value,  since  Congress  had  forbidden  settlements  on 
the  north  side  of  the  Ohio.^  This  affected  the  villages  of 
Bellefontaine  and  Grand  Ruisseau.  In  this  condition  Tardi- 
veau saw  his  opportunity.  He  agreed  with  the  settlers  to  repre- 
sent their  case  before  Congress  and  obtain  for  each  of  them  a 
concession  of  land,  in  consideration  of  one  tenth  of  all  land  thus 
granted.  The  agreement  was  signed  by  one  hundred  and  thirty 
Americans.  He  also  represented  to  the  French  that  their  suffer- 
ings merited  payment  in  land  and  offered  to  obtain  for  each  of 
them  a  grant  of  five  hundred  acres  on  the  same  terms.  The 
French  had  begun  to  learn  the  American  habit  of  speculating  in 
land,  at  least  they  thought  they  saw  their  opportunity  to  imitate 
that  example,  and  most  of  them  took  advantage  of  the  offer.     In 

1  Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xlviii.,  19. 

2  Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,  32. 
^Ibid,  31. 


INTRODUCTION  cxxxix 

all  fifty-three  signed  the  contract  at  Kaskaskia,  as  did  also  the 
most  representative  citizens  of  Cahokia.  To  Pierre  Langlois 
this  act  seemed  to  be  a  surrender  to  the  enemy  and  he  realized 
that  the  French  would  never  reap  the  benefit,  as  in  fact  they  did 
not,  for  the  majority  were  too  indolent  to  cultivate  the  ground 
they  already  possessed.  He  therefore  wrote  a  letter  to  Con- 
gress saying  that  the  French  had  been  deceived  and  were  not  in 
need  of  that  form  of  relief.^ 

For  the  next  year  Tardiveau  deluged  Congress  with  petitions. 
They  were  long  wordy  affairs  full  of  glittering  generaHties  and 
flowery  phrases.  He  had  been  given  copies  of  all  the  previous 
petitions  and  other  important  papers,  and  out  of  these  he 
wove  a  story  to  soften  the  hearts  of  the  congressional  dele- 
gates; but  he  was  careful  not  to  mention  names  or  particular 
events  of  the  last  few  years,  for  his  constituents  were  of 
all  the  parties  which  had  divided  Illinois  politics,  and  he 
wished  to  obtain  lands  for  all.  He  painted  the  French  as  Hving 
in  Arcadian  simplicity,  guided  only  by  the  dictates  of  con- 
science and  innocently  bowing  to  the  hardships  thrust  upon  them, 
but  through  all  their  troubles  retaining  an  unbounded  faith  in  the 
goodness  of  Congress  and  a  faithfulness  to  the  American  cause. 
The  Americans  he  pictured  as  making  settlements  with  all  faith 
in  the  power  of  the  courts  to  grant  land,  and  as  being  greatly  sur- 
prised at  the  illegality  of  the  titles  thus  obtained.  He  allowed 
himself  to  speak  against  Clark  and  his  officers  who,  on  account  of 
the  recent  attack  on  the  Indians  and  the  garrisoning  of  Vincennes, 
were  in  little  favor.^  He  found  that  George  Morgan  and  his 
associates  were  attempting  to  obtain  a  grant  of  land  for  a  colony 
in  the  same  region  and  protected  the  interests  of  his  constituents 
from  them.^ 

Tardiveau  was  successful  in  arousing  an  interest  in  the  French 
and  gaining  for  them  grants  of  land.  Between  the  years  1788  and 
1 791  three  laws  were  passed,  either  by  the  Continental  Congress 

1  Papers  of  Old  Cong,  xlviii.,  89. 

2  See  his  petitions  in  Papers  of  Old  Cong,  xlvii.,  119,  123,  209;  xli.,  275. 
'  Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xlviii .,  89 


cxl  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

or  the  Congress  of  the  United  States,  by  which  four  hundred 
acres  were  given  to  every  head  of  a  family  living  in  the  villages 
in  the  year  1783,  and  a  hundred  acres  to  those  enlisted  in  the 
mihtia  in  1790;  to  satisfy  the  Americans  they  were  granted  titles 
to  lands  which  had  been  taken  up  under  concessions  of  a  sup- 
posed authority  and  which  had  been  improved.^  The  history 
of  these  land  grants  belongs  to  a  later  era ;  for  twenty  years  were 
to  pass  before  the  many  difficulties  arising  out  of  them  were 
settled.  Sufficient  for  our  purpose  is  the  fact  that  very  few  of 
the  petitioners  or  their  families  were  benefited  by  the  concessions, 
for,  long  before  the  claims  were  settled,  the  rights  of  the  original 
grantees  were  purchased  by  American  land  speculators.  That 
story  is  but  a  continuation  of  the  present  one,  the  supplanting 
of  the  French  by  the  more  virile  Anglo-Saxons.^ 

While  Tardiveau  was  thus  representing  the  misfortunes  of  the 
Illinois  to  Congress,  the  Court  which  had  been  founded  with 
such  hopes  had,  after  a  short  period  of  innocuous  existence,  passed 
away.^  The  French  of  Kaskaskia  were  not  experienced  enough 
to  inaugurate  a  new  movement  after  the  events  of  the  past  years. 
Had  they  been  left  to  themselves  they  might  have  succeeded  as 
well  as  the  Cahokians  with  self  government ;  but  their  spirit  had 
been  broken,  and  their  natural  leaders  had  taken  refuge  on  the 
Spanish  shore.  Influenced  by  the  example  of  the  Americans, 
the  French  themselves  gave  no  obedience  to  the  court  which  they 
had  established.  In  1789  John  Edgar  summed  up  the  character 
of  the  people  of  Kaskaskia  in  these  words :  "  It  is  in  vain  to  expect 
an  obedience  to  any  Regulations,  however  salutary  in  a  place 
where  every  one  thinks  himself  master,  &  where  there  is  not  the 
least  degree  of  subordination.  You  know  better  than  I,  the 
dispositions  of  a  people  who  have  ever  been  subject  to  a  military 
power,  &  are  unacquainted  with  the  blessings  of  a  free  govern- 
ment by  the  voice  of  their  equals.     To  the  commands  of  a  Superior 

^  A  good  account  of  these  laws  is  given  by  E.  G.  Mason  in  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.  Col.,  iv.,  192 
et  seq.;   see  also  Amer.  State  Papers  Pub.  Lands,  ii.,  124. 

2  In  Chester  111.  there  are  several  record  books  containing  the  record  of  these  sales  of 
claims.    The  prices  paid  for  each  four  hundred  acres  range  from  fifteen  dollars  upwards. 

3  Mason,  John  Todd's  Record-Book,  313. 


INTRODUCTION  cxli 

there  are  no  people  readier  to  obey ;  but  without  a  superior  there 
are  none  more  difl&cult  to  be  governed."* 

The  end  of  the  court  was  without  doubt  hastened  by  the 
charge  of  illegality  of  its  decisions  made  by  the  Kentuckians,  who 
refused  to  recognize  any  civil  organization  in  Illinois,  saying 
that  under  the  act  of  Congress,  neither  the  people  nor  the  com- 
manding officer  was  authorized  to  appoint  magistrates.^  This 
reference  is  to  the  "Ordinance  of  1787",  which  created  a  govern- 
ment for  the  Northwest  and  under  which  ordinance  Arthur  St. 
Clair  was  appointed  governor  in  1788;  but,  since  the  effects  of 
this  act  were  not  extended  to  the  Illinois  till  the  spring  of  1790, 
the  people  were  without  other  authority  than  that  which  resided 
in  themselves  and  were  for  the  moment  weakened  by  the  ordi- 
nance itself,  since  it  annulled  all  other  jurisdiction  than  that  which 
might  be  established  in  accordance  with  its  decrees. 

The  history  of  the  "  Ordinance  of  1787  "  does  not  fall,  however, 
within  the  Hmits  of  this  Introduction ;  but  in  one  point  it  was  to 
affect  the  Illinois  seriously  and  immediately.  It  prohibited 
slavery  in  the  Northwest.  As  soon  as  this  was  learned,  the  French 
supposed  that  the  slaves  which  they  had  always  owned  would  be 
set  at  liberty.  This  fear  was  used  by  the  Spaniards  to  draw  the 
inhabitants  of  American  lUinois  to  their  territory  as  settlers.  In 
1788  George  Morgan,  who  was,  as  we  have  seen,  well  known  in 
the  lands  on  the  Mississippi,  was  attempting  to  make  a  settlement 
at  New  Madrid.  He  had  been  disappointed  in  obtaining  a  grant 
of  land  for  a  settlement  on  the  American  side  and  so  accepted  the 
offer  of  the  Spanish  government  for  a  large  tract  on  the  western 
bank.^  He  advertised  extensively  the  advantages  of  the  colony, 
where  he  had  been  accorded  religious  toleration  and  the  free 
navigation  of  the  Mississippi.  One  of  the  arguments  he  used  was 
the  action  of  Congress  in  making  the  land  of  the  Northwest  free 
soil.  He  attracted  many  French  and  Americans  by  this  means 
in  spite  of  the  efforts  of  Tardiveau  and  Major  Hamtranck,  com- 

1  Edgar  to  Hamtranck  Dr.  MSS.,  2 wi 24-142. 

2  Hamtranck  to  Harmar  November  11,  1789,  Dr.  MSS.,  2Wia4-i42.  This  was  said 
of  the  court  of  Post  Vincennes,  but  was  equally  true  of  Kaskaskia. 

3  Winsor,  Westward  Movement,  366. 


cxlii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

manding  at  Post  Vincennes,  who  tried  to  stop  the  emigration  by 
assuring  the  French  that  Congress  had  no  intention  of  freeing  the 
slaves  already  owned  in  the  territory,  an  interpretation  of  the 
ordinance  which  St.  Clair  later  confirmed.* 

Another  cause  of  the  emigration  at  this  time  was  the  danger 
to  life  and  property  from  the  Indians.  Several  tribes  of  the  North- 
west were  on  the  warpath  and  had  ceased  to  spare  the  villages, 
as  they  had  previously  been  inclined  to  do,  when  the  attachment 
of  the  French  to  the  Americans  was  uncertain.  The  Miami,  the 
Wabash,  the  Kickapoos,  and  the  Pottawattamies  were  all  accounted 
enemies  and  had  made  attacks  on  the  unprotected  settlements.^ 
The  villages  in  the  Illinois  suffered  most,  however,  from  the  Pianke- 
shaws  of  the  Spanish  bank,  who  were  incited  by  the  Spaniards 
to  burn  and  murder  until  the  inhabitants  should  be  forced  to  take 
refuge  under  the  Spanish  government.  A  writer  from  Kaskaskia 
says:  "It  is  well  known  that  the  minds  of  the  Indians  are  con- 
tinually poisoned  by  the  traders  on  the  other  side,  who  set  off 
America  in  the  most  despicable  light  possible,  which  has  not  a 
small  influence  with  the  Indians.  Government  may  not  encourage 
it,  but  surely  if  friends  to  us  they  ought  to  put  a  stop  to  it."^  On 
October  8,  1789,  John  Dodge,  who  was  glad  enough  of  an  oppor- 
tunity to  revenge  himself,  led  a  band  of  these  Indians  and  Some 
whites  into  the  village  of  Kaskaskia  and  attempted  to  carry  off 
some  slaves  belonging  to  John  Edgar,  the  most  prominent  and 
one  of  the  last  Americans  to  cling  to  that  village.  Although  he 
failed,  the  Hves  of  Edgar,  his  wife,  and  John  Rice  Jones  were 
for  a  time  in  the  greatest  danger.^ 

It  is  possible  that  the  Spanish  government  did  not  send  out 
such  expeditions  as  that  led  by  Dodge,  yet  the  purpose  accom- 
plished by  such  a  policy  was  in  accordance  with  the  instructions 
from  the  government,  if  we  are  to  believe  the  report  of  Chouteau, 

^  Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,  103,  117,  122,  176;  Dawson  to  Governor  Randolph,  January 
29,  1789,  Va.  State  Papers,  iv.,  554;  Hamtranck  to  Harmar,  March  and  August,  1789, 
Dr.  MSS.,  2W17,  70. 

2  Hamtramck  to  Harmar,  Dr.  MSS.,  2W17,  39. 

3  Edgar  to  Hamtramck,  October  28,  1789,  Dr.  MSS.,  2W124-142. 
*  Ibid. 


INTRODUCTION  cxliii 

who  informed  Edgar  that  "orders  had  been  received  from  New 
Orleans  by  the  Lieut.  Gov''  of  St.  Louis,  for  him  to  make  every 
difficulty  possible  with  the  people  of  this  side,  so  that  they  might 
thereby  be  forced  to  go  to  live  on  the  other. "^  That  they  might 
be  induced  to  change  their  allegiance,  Governor  Miro  issued  a 
proclamation  offering  land  gratis  and  other  attractions  to  all  new 
comers.^ 

A  further  means  of  inducing  immigration  was  the  enticement 
of  the  French  priests  to  the  Spanish  side.  Father  Le  Dru,  who 
had  succeeded  De  la  Valiniere  at  Kaskaskia,  Father  St.  Pierre  at 
Cahokia,  and  later  Father  Gibault  were  persuaded  to  take  parishes 
in  the  Spanish  territory.  The  cause  mentioned  was  not  the  only 
one  which  affected  the  priests ;  for  they  found  the  French  of  the 
American  Bottom  very  indifferent  about  reHgion  and  both  unable 
and  unwilling  to  pay  tithes,  thus  making  it  impossible  for  the 
priests  to  live  among  them.^ 

The  result  of  the  hardships  which  the  French  had  endured 
during  these  years  and  the  long  deferred  fulfilment  of  their 
dreams  of  peace  and  independence  was  a  striking  decrease  in  the 
population  of  Kaskaskia.  We  have  seen  that  in  1778,  when 
George  Rogers  Clark  occupied  the  village,  there  were  about  five 
hundred  white  inhabitants.'*  In  1783  there  were  194  heads  of 
famiHes.  As  thirty-nine  of  these  were  newly  arrived  Americans, 
the  figures  apparently  prove  that  the  French  population  had  re- 
mained about  stationary.^  By  the  census  of  1787,  there  were 
191  male  inhabitants  in  the  village.*  Counting  150  women  and 
female  children,  which  is  probably  too  high  an  estimate  for  a 
frontier  community,  the  population  was  about  341,  which  would 
mean  a  decided  decrease.  The  period  of  the  greatest  emigra- 
tion occurred  between  the  years  1787  and  1790,  when  anarchy 
reached  its  climax  in  Kaskaskia,  and  the  Spaniards  were  holding 

1  Jones  to  Hamtramck,  October  29,  1789,  Dr.  MSS.,  2W124-142.  / 

2  Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,  122. 

3  Jones  to  Hamtramck,  October  29,  1789,  Dr.  MSS.,  2W124-142. 
*See  5«^ra  p.  xvi. 

5  Mason,  Early  Illinois  Citizens,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  198  et  seq. 
^Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xivui.,  181. 


cxHv  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

out  the  greatest  inducements  to  settlers  on  the  western  bank  of 
the  river.  There  has  been  preserved  a  Hst  of  the  male  inhabi- 
tants in  Kaskaskia  for  the  year  1790,  in  which  the  heads  of 
families  are  enumerated.  The  number  is  44.^  This  is  a  de- 
crease of  over  77  per  cent  in  the  French  population  of  the  village 
since  1783.  This  Hst  is  interesting  on  account  of  the  names  which 
are  missing.  Almost  all  the  men  who  had  been  leaders  of  the 
French  people  throughout  the  period  of  the  county  of  Illinois 
were  no  longer  residents  of  Kaskaskia.  We  look  in  vain  for  the 
names  of  Cerre,  Vitale,  J.  Bte.,  and  Antoine  Bauvais,  Corset, 
Lasource,  the  elder  Charlevilles,  Morin,  De  Monbreun,  Langlois, 
Levasseur,  Lafont,  Carbonneaux.  They  have  crossed  the  river 
to  seek  peace  and  safety  under  the  flag  of  Spain. 

The  picture  of  the  village  of  Kaskaskia  as  described  by  its 
people  in  these  last  days  in  a  petition  to  Major  Hamtramck  is  one 
of  utter  misery  and  despair.  They  wrote :  "  Our  horses,  horned 
cattle  &  corn  are  stolen  &  destroyed  without  the  power  of  making 
any  effective  resistance:  Our  houses  are  in  ruins  &  decay; 
our  lands  are  uncultivated;  debtors  absconded  and  absconding, 
our  little  commons,  destroyed.  We  are  aprehensive  of  a  dearth  of 
corn  and  our  best  prospects  are  misery  and  distress,  or  what  is 
more  pr'obable  an  untimey  death  by  the  hands  of  the  savages. 

"We  are  well  convinced  that  all  these  misfortunes  have  be- 
fallen us  for  want  of  some  Superior  or  Commanding  authority; 
for  ever  since  the  cession  of  this  territory  to  Congress  we  have 
been  neglected  as  an  abandoned  people,  to  encounter  all  the 
difficulties  that  are  always  attendant  upon  anarchy  and  confusion, 
neither  did  we  know  from  authority  until  latterly,  to  what  power 
we  were  subject.  The  greater  part  of  our  citizens  have  left  the 
country  on  this  account  to  reside  in  the  Spanish  dominions ;  others 
are  now  following,  and  we  are  fearful,  nay  certain,  that  without 
your  assistance,  the  small  remainder  will  be  obHged  to  follow 
their  example."  ^ 

In  the  foregoing  petition  the  people  begged  Major  Hamtramck 

^  Mason,  Early  Illinois  Citizens,  Chi.  Hist.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  209. 
1  Dr.  MSS.,  2W124-142. 


INTRODUCTION  cxlv 

to  send  twenty  soldiers  with  an  officer  to  maintain  order  and  to 
give  them  authority  to  establish  a  civil  government.  The  peti- 
tion was  accompanied  by  a  letter  from  John  Edgar,  who  promised 
to  furnish  barracks  and  supplies  for  the  soldiers  at  the  very  lowest 
price  until  the  governor  could  make  other  arrangements.^  This 
Hamtramck  had  no  authority  to  do,  nor  could  he  afford  to  send 
the  men;  but  he  forwarded  the  petition,  and  so  far  exceeded 
his  powers  as  to  authorize  the  formation  of  courts  of  justice. 
These  were  never  established,  since  justices  without  troops  would 
have  no  means  of  enforcing  the  law. 

The  trials  of  the  last  year  broke  the  courage  of  John  Edgar,  who 
had  realized  the  possible  greatness  of  the  territory,  and  had  used 
his  influence  to  promote  peace  and  to  bring  a  government  to  the 
disordered  and  disheartened  village.  In  November,  1789,  he 
wrote:  "The  Spring  it  is  possible  I  can  stand  my  ground,  sur- 
rounded as  we  are  by  Savage  enemies.  I  have  waited  five  years 
in  hopes  of  a  Government;  I  shall  wait  until  March,  as  I  may 
be  able  to  withstand  them  in  the  winter  season,  but  if  no  succour 
nor  government  should  then  arrive,  I  shall  be  compelled  to  aban- 
don the  country,  &  I  shall  go  to  live  at  St.  Louis.  Inclination, 
interest  &  love  for  the  country  prompt  me  to  reside  here,  but 
when  in  so  doing  it  is  ten  to  one  but  both  my  hfe  &  property  will 
fall  a  sacrifice,  you  nor  any  impartial  mind  can  blame  me  for  the 
part  I  shall  take."^  Edgar  was  not  compelled  to  abandon  the 
country  of  his  adoption,  for  in  the  month  designated  Governor 
St.  Clair  arrived  in  the  village  of  Kaskaskia. 

The  history  of  the  village  of  Kaskaskia  at  which  the  county 
government  had  been  estabHshed  is  the  story  of  the  prolonged 
suffering  of  the  French  population.  Tyranny  followed  upon 
tyranny.  After  the  Virginia  troops  had  stripped  the  people,  came 
John  Dodge  with  his  policy  of  terrorism,  and  when  he  had  been 
overthrown  and  the  French  people  had  seized  the  power,  their 
hands  were  too  feeble  to  maintain  order  at  home,  and  their  village 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  2wi24-i42. 

2  Ibid. 


cxlvi  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

became  the  prey  of  the  savages  and  Spaniards.  From  this  picture, 
it  is  a  pleasure  to  turn  to  the  village  of  Cahokia  at  the  extreme 
north  of  the  American  Bottom.  Here  the  troubles  were  somewhat 
similar  in  kind  as  those  at  Kaskaskia,  but  never  so  virulent  and 
the  court  of  the  district  of  Cahokia  was  able  to  estabHsh  itself  and 
its  authority  so  securely  that  even  the  abandonment  by  Virginia  and 
the  United  States  could  not  shake  it.  The  letter  from  the  state's 
attorney,  Joseph  Labuxiere,  printed  in  this  volume  draws  the 
contrast  between  the  conditions  existing  in  the  two  villages  in  the 
following  words:  "The  misunderstanding  of  the  magistrates  of 
Kaskaskia  and  the  extreme  disorder  of  the  business  of  the  individ- 
uals, occasioned  by  some  persons  greedy  for  money,  have  com- 
pelled me  to  withdraw  with  my  family  to  Cahokia,  where  I  have 
found  the  inhabitants  filled  with  the  unity  of  peace  and  fidelity 
to  the  states,  and  a  court  which  the  justices  are  careful  to  administer 
with  equity  to  those  who  ask  its  help."^ 

Another  fact  gives  striking  proof  of  the  condition  described  by 
Labuxiere.  At  the  beginning  of  the  period  the  population  of 
Cahokia  numbered  about  300  inhabitants.^  In  the  year  1787  a 
careful  census  was  made  and  there  were  240  male  inhabitants, 
which  would  make  the  total  population  over  400,  and  in  1790 
Cahokia  was  capable  of  supporting  three  companies  of  militia  while 
Kaskaskia  had  but  one.^  Thus  while  Kaskaskia  was  decreasing, 
Cahokia  was  growing  both  in  size  and  in  importance,  and  be- 
coming the  "metropolis"  of  the  American  Bottom. 

As  far  as  can  be  learned  Francois  Trottier  was  the  commandant 
of  the  mihtia  throughout  this  period  and  it  is  due  largely  to  his 
efficient  administration  of  the  police  that  the  village  prospered.* 
The  justices  were  elected  annually  by  the  assembly  of  the  people 
until  the  passage  of  the  Ordinance  of  1787,  when,  in  anticipation 
of  a  new  government,  regular  elections  ceased  and  the  same  jus- 

1  See  post,  p.  589. 

2  See  supra,  p.  xv. 

"    3  Mason,  Early  Illinois  Citizens,  Chi.  His.  Soc.'s  Collections,  iv.,  216  et  seq.;  see  post,  p. 
632. 

*  In  1785  Antoine  Girardin  held  this  oflBce  temporarily  as  did  J.  B.  Dubuque  at  a  later 
period. 


INTRODUCTION  cxlvii 

tices  continued  in  office.  In  August,  1788,  there  was  an  election 
of  three  magistrates  to  fill  vacancies  made  by  resignation.  It  was 
the  last  election  held  in  the  county  of  Illinois.  The  justices  held 
their  sessions  with  great  regularity  and  their  administration  was 
admirable. 

The  relation  of  Cahokia  to  the  county  government  was  never 
very  close.  In  fact  the  people  Of  that  village  did  not  appear  to 
have  any  very  great  respect  for  the  Kaskaskians;  for  in  their 
petition  to  Congress  in  1786  they  begged  that  body  not  to  submit 
them  to  the  jurisdiction  of  the  southern  village,  because  they  knew 
"  the  incapacity,  spite,  and  partiality  of  those  who  would  exercise 
it."^  The  high  sounding  title  of  deputy  county  lieutenant  meant 
little  more  than  head  of  Kaskaskia.  This  at  least  was  the  feel- 
ing of  the  Cahokians,  and  the  only  hint  that  such  was  not  the 
actual  condition  is  the  fact  that  Timothe  de  Monbreun  made 
several  journeys  to  Cahokia  in  order  to  negotiate  with  the  Span- 
iards and  Indans  in  the  interest  of  the  whole  territory.^  That  he 
or  any  of  the  other  deputies  of  John  Todd  really  had  the  power  to 
interfere  in  the  affairs  at  Cahokia  is  not  apparent  from  the  records, 
and,  in  the  absence  of  proof  and  in  view  of  the  actual  powers 
exercised  by  the  court  of  the  village,  it  seems  best  to  regard  the 
county  government  as  more  formal  than  actual. 

We  have  seen  that  the  Kaskaskians  complained  of  the  estab- 
lishment of  the  Michillimackinac  company  at  Cahokia.  From 
the  year  1783  many  British  merchants  found  their  way  to  the 
Illinois  and  established  stores  in  the  village.  Among  the  names 
which  occur  are  J.  B.  Perrault,  representing  Marchisseaux  of 
Montreal,  James  Grant,  Meyers,  Tabeau,  Guillon,  WiUiam 
Arundel,  John  Askins,  and  others.^  These  merchants  practically 
monopolized  the  fur  trade  of  Illinois;  but  the  Cahokians, 
finding  that  they  interfered  with  the  Indian  trade  as  well,  were 
strong  enough  to  make  regulations  to  protect  their  own  interests" 
and  gave  a  limited  monopoly  of  that  trade  to  one  of  the  citizens 

1  See  post,  p.  587 . 

2  Memorial  of  De  Monbreun,  Va.  State  Lib. 

3  Narrative  of  Perrault  in  Schoolcraft,  Indian  Antiquities,  iii.,  355;  this  volume,  passim; 
Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,  174. 


cxlviii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

of  the  village  and  prohibited  all  sale  of  liquor  to  the  savages 
by  others.^  When  the  Indian  outrages  reached  their  climax 
in  the  year  1789  and  Kaskaskians  were  begging  the  military  officer 
at  Vincennes  to  send  troops  for  their  defense,  the  court  of  Caho- 
kia  still  further  regulated  intercourse  with  the  Indians  and 
forbade  all  sale  of  liquor  by  any  one.^ 

Exactly  how  the  Cahokians  were  affected  by  the  intrigues  of 
the  Spaniards  in  the  later  years,  it  is  impossible  to  say.  At  the 
end  of  the  record  of  the  sessions  will  be  found  an  unexplained 
punishment  of  a  Frenchman  from  St.  Louis  who  was  evidently 
attempting  to  undermine  the  power  of  the  court ;  but  once  again 
that  body  was  equal  to  maintaining  its  authority  and,  from  the 
complaint  of  the  prisoner,  it  would  appear  that  the  support  of  the 
villagers  was  given  to  the  government.^ 

Cahokia  was  not  disturbed  by  the  Americans  in  the  same  way 
as  her  sister  village,  for  the  American  troops  did  not  remain  in 
the  village  after  1780  and  very  few  individuals  took  up  their 
residence  there.  Aside  from  the  British  merchants  only  four  non- 
French  names  appear  in  the  later  years  as  actual  citizens,  Thomas 
Brady,  PhiHppe  Engel,  Isaac  Levy,  and  William  Arundel,  and  of 
these  the  first  three  seem  to  have  become  completely  gallicized 
and  to  have  married  French  women.  The  American  settlers  who 
came  in  closest  contact  with  the  Cahokians  resided  at  Grand 
Ruisseau,  which  fell  within  the  district  of  the  village.  In  1786 
they  were  permitted  by  the  magistrates,  as  we  have  seen,  to  ap- 
point a  captain  of  militia,  but  they  remained  subject  to  the  im- 
mediate jurisdiction  of  the  court  except  in  such  cases  as  might 
be  decided  by  arbitrators.^ 

Cahokia,  however,  was  not  to  escape  wholly  without  trouble 
from  these  neighbors.  After  the  failure  of  the  Americans  in  the 
spring  of  1787  to  capture  control  of  the  court  of  Kaskaskia  the 
settlers  of  Bellefontaine  and  Grand  Ruisseau  determined  to 
establish    a    rival    and    independent    court,  for   which    purpose 

1  See  post,  p.  73,  1-5,  215,  259,  575 

2  See  post,  p.  607. 

3  See  post,  p.  437- 
*See  post,  p.  217. 


INTRODUCTION  cxlix 

they  held  an  election  and  chose  magistrates.  If  the  movement 
had  been  confined  to  the  first  named  village,  which  was  in  the 
district  of  Kaskaskia,  the  Cahokia  government  might  not  have 
made  any  opposition;  but  the  inclusion  of  the  village  of  Grand 
Ruisseau  was  an  affront  to  the  one  French  court  which  had 
proved  its  right  to  exist.  Fortunately  for  the  Cahokians,  the 
leaders  of  the  movement  wished  to  supplant  Robert  Watts,  their 
appointee,  in  his  office  of  commandant.  This  aroused  Watts  to 
immediate  action,  particularly  as  his  rival  was  James  Piggott, 
a  man  who  represented  the  more  restless  and  impatient  element 
among  the  Americans.* 

Watts  came  to  Cahokia  and  addressed  the  court  in  Ciceronian 
periods,  pointing  out  the  danger  which  threatened  the  law  and 
order  of  the  district  by  this  innovation  or  revolution.  The  danger 
was  not  exaggerated.  The  court  at  Cahokia  represented  the 
only  stable  power  in  the  Illinois  at  the  time,  and  with  a  rival 
cpurt  of  Americans  at  Grand  Ruisseau  and  Bellefontaine,  there 
would  inevitably  have  followed  disorders  which  might  have 
taken  on  the  character  of  a  civil  war  between  the  two  peoples. 
Certainly  the  two  courts  would  not  have  acted  together  for  the 
suppression  of  lawlessness.  The  action  of  the  court  of  Cahokia 
was  prompt  and  energetic.  It  prohibited  the  holding  of  any 
independent  assemblies  of  the  people  or  sessions  of  the  court, 
and  condemned  the  leaders  of  the  movement  to  be  put  in  irons 
for  twenty-four  hours  and,  in  case  they  disobeyed  the  order  of 
the  court,  they  were  to  be  driven  from  the  territory.  The  magis- 
trates of  Cahokia  were  not  weak.  Their  decrees  were  executed. 
In  striking  contrast  to  the  timidity  and  inefficiency  of  the  court 
of  Kaskaskia  is  the  action  recorded  by  the  hiissier  under  that 
decree  against  the  Americans:  "The  present  decree  has  been 
executed  the  same  day."^ 

This  revolution  occurred  in  August  or  early  in  September. 
The  Cahokia  justices  now  felt  the  need  of  taking  some  steps  to 

^  Piggott  was  later  appointed  by  St.  Clair  one  of  the  first  judges  in  the  district  of 
Cahokia.    Smith,  St.  Clair  papers,  ii.,  165;  for  some  account  of  him  see  post,  p.  190,  note  i. 

2  See  post,  p.  597  et  seq. 


cl  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

satisfy  the  demands  of  the  Americans.  Those  at  Bellefontaine 
belonged  by  right  to  the  Kaskaskia  jurisdiction,  but  to  expect 
from  the  Kaskaskia  French  the  maintenance  of  law  and  order 
was  hopeless.  Therefore,  when  all  the  Americans  of  the  region 
petitioned  for  admittance  to  the  district  of  Cahokia  and  the 
right  of  electing  a  justice  of  the  peace  at  each  of  the  two  chief 
settlements,  the  petition  was  granted  at  the  October  session  of 
the  court,  and  the  election  of  a  justice  and  a  militia  officer  at 
Bellefontaine  and  of  a  justice  at  Grand  Ruisseau  was  confirmed 
on  November  2d.*  Thus  around  Cahokia  there  centered  all 
the  forces  which  made  for  peace  and  order,  and  even  the  American 
settlers,  who  had  assisted  in  the  overthrow  of  the  court  of  Kaskas- 
kia, were  able  to  escape  the  anarchy  which  their  presence  had 
produced  only  by  submitting  to  the  Frenchmen  of  the  northern 
village. 

As  may  be  seen  in  the  following  pages,  the  court  at  Cahokia 
continued  to  maintain  order  in  its  district  until  other  and  more 
legal  regulations  were  made.  During  the  last  years  the  court  was 
constantly  expecting  the  arrival  of  the  governor,  who  had  been 
appointed  in  1788  under  the  law  creating  the  Territory  Northwest 
of  the  Ohio  River;  but  Governor  St.  Clair  was  unable  to  reach 
the  Illinois  until  two  years  after  his  appointment.  Finally  after 
long  delay,  on  March  5,  1790,  he  actually  arrived  in  Kaskaskia. 
This  was  the  limit  of  time  John  Edgar  had  fixed  to  which  he 
would  wait  for  the  inauguration  of  a  government  at  that  village. 
The  Cahokia  court  held  its  usual  meeting  in  the  same  month, 
and  again  on  the  first  of  April  the  court  heard  suits  brought 
before  it  and  adjourned  to  the  first  of  May.  Here  the  record  of 
the  sessions  of  the  Court  of  the  District  of  Cahokia  of  the  county 
of  Illinois  ends,  for  on  the  27th  of  April  the  county  of  St.  Clair 
was  instituted  and  two  days  later  the  appointment  of  the  judges 
of  the  new  courts  was  announced. 

The  history  of  these  new  courts  is  of  a  later  date  than  the 
limit  of  the  present  Introduction,  but  the  next  period  in  the 
history  of  Illinois  is  a  continuation  of  that  which  we  have  already 

1  See  Post,  p.  3oy 


INTRODUCTION  cli 

reviewed.  The  French  were  not  able  to  struggle  against  the 
Americans,  who  were  now  placed  in  the  ruling  positions,  and 
a  new  exodus  of  the  population  began.  To  follow  the  destinies 
of  the  more  energetic  families  named  in  these  pages,  it  is  neces- 
sary to  cross  the  river.  The  descendants  of  J.  Bte.  Barbau,  of 
the  Bauvais,  the  Sauciers  and  the  Trottiers  are  to  be  sought  not 
in  the  territory  or  state  of  Illinois,  but  in  that  territory  which  for 
a  few  years  remained  under  the  dominion  of  Spain,  where  the 
French  took  refuge.  The  census  of  several  old  French  towns  of 
the  western  banks  of  the  Mississippi  reveals  the  presence  of 
many  families  once  inhabiting  the  American  Bottom.  The 
French  have  not  figured  prominently  in  the  later  history  of  Illi- 
nois, but  the  continuation  of  their  civilization  is  found  in  the  sister 
state  of  Missouri,  where  they  still  form  an  important  element 
in  the  population;  or  else  in  the  far  West,  where  many  de- 
scendants of  the  sons  of  Kaskaskia  and  Cahokia  fled  before 
the  advance  of  the  American  settlers  and  followed  the  life 
for  which  they  had  been  trained,  that  of  trader,  pioneer,  and 
trapper. 

In  the  foregoing  history  of  the  "County  of  Illinois"  I  have 
based  the  narrative  upon  the  source  material  that  has  been  pre- 
served from  that  time,  some  account  of  which  should  be  given,  since 
several  of  the  collections  studied  have  been  unknown  to  previous 
historians  of  the  period  and  none  have  been  used  so  extensively 
before. 

I.  Kaskaskia  Records:^  These  were  found  by  myself  in  the 
office  of  the  circuit  clerk  of  Randolph  county  at  Chester,  Illinois,  in 
the  late  summer  of  1905.  They  consist  of  2804  eighteenth  century 
documents  of  all  sizes,  ranging  from  the  scrap  of  paper  to  a  volume 
of  444  pages,  and  of  all  kinds  of  legal  instruments,  ordinances,  and 
letters.  The  number  issuing  from  the  county  of  Illinois  is  506. 
I  have  classified  them  according  to  character,  i.  e.,  certificates, 
land  grants,  political  papers,  etc.     They  are  cited  as  follows: 

^  Alvord,  "Eighteenth^Century  French  Records  in  the  Archives  of  Illinois,"  Annual 
Report  of  Amer.  Hist.  Assn.  for  1905. 


clii  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Kas.  Rec,  Pol.  Papers,  etc.  This  collection  belongs  to  the 
county  of  St.  Clair  and  is  kept  in  the  fireproof  office  of  the 
circuit  clerk.  Temporarily  it  is  loaned  to  the  library  of  the 
University  of  Illinois  for  my  use.  One  document,  which  I  failed 
to  see  at  the  time  of  the  discovery,  is  still  in  Chester.  Since  it  is 
of  great  value  and  no  report  has  yet  been  made  upon  it,  I  give  a 
description  of  it  here.  It  is  a  court  record  of  256  pages.  Pages 
1-57  contain  the  records  of  the  sessions  of  the  court  of  judicature 
founded  by  Colonel  Wilkins  in  1768  and  of  the  judgments  of  the 
military  commandants,  acting  as  judges  after  the  aboHtion  of 
the  court,  up  to  January  30,  1773.  Pages  57-90  were  used  to 
record  deeds,  etc.,  from  May  9,  1776,  to  June  23,  1778.  The 
rest  of  the  book  contains  the  registrations  for  the  next  two  years, 
made  by  the  clerks  after  the  occupation  of  the  country  by  Clark. 
Several  of  the  pages  are  missing. 

2.  Cahokia  Records:^  These  belong  to  the  county  of  St. 
Clair,  Illinois,  and  are  kept  in  a  fireproof  museum  in  the  court- 
house at  Belleville.  The  most  important  of  these  documents  are 
printed  in  this  volume  and  need  no  further  description.  Besides 
those  printed,  there  are  a  number  of  marriage  contracts  and  other 
instruments  in  Belleville;  and  170  documents,  which  were  for- 
merly in  the  county  treasurer's  office,  are  now  in  the  library  of 
the  Chicago  Historical  Society.^  The  proper  citation  is  Cak.  Rec. 
in  Chicago  or  in  Belleville,  111. 

3.  Menard  Collection:  This  consists  of  the  correspondence 
and  letter-books  of  Pierre  Menard,  who  settled  in  Kaskaskia  in 
1790.  The  majority  of  the  letters  date  from  the  latter  part  of 
Menard's  life ;  but  in  the  collection  are  four  large  bundles  of  let- 
ters and  documents  which  belonged  to  Barthelemi  Tardiveau,  agent 
of  the  Illinois  people  in  1787  and  1788.  Two  of  these  bundles 
are  composed  of  copies  of  records  from  the  Kaskaskia  record-book 
and  some  original  manuscripts,  which  he  used  for  his  information 
in  drawing  up  his  petitions  to  Congress.  There  are  in  all  sixty- 
one  selected  documents  emanating  generally  from   the   French 

1  Ibid;  Bulletin  of  the  III.  State  Hist,  lib.,  vol.  i,  No.  i. 

'  I  have  learned  too  late  to  make  the  necessary  changes  in  the  foot-notes  that  the  Chi- 
cago Historical  Society  has  returned  these  documents  to  Belleville. 


INTRODUCTION  cliii 

inhabitants,  which  makes  this  collection  one  of  the  most  valuable 
for  the  history  of  the  county  of  Illinois.  The  majority  of  these 
document  were  copied  by  the  clerk  of  the  court  in  the  spring  of 
i78i,at  the  time  the  people  of  Kaskaskia  commissioned  Prevost 
and  McCarty  to  represent  them  at  the  capitol  of  Virginia.^  They 
are  all  properly  authenticated  by  Richard  Winston,  deputy 
county  heutenant. 

4.  Draper  Manuscripts:^  These  are  so  well  known  that  a 
description  of  them  is  unnecessary.  They  were  collected  by 
Lyman  C.  Draper  during  his  long  and  useful  life,  which  he  devoted 
to  the  collection  of  material  for  the  study  of  western  history,  and 
they  form  the  most  valuable  part  of  the  Wisconsin  Historical 
Society's  collection  of  manuscripts.  For  my  purposes  the  George 
Rogers  Clark  Manuscripts,  contained  in  sixty-five  volumes,  have 
been  of  the  most  use.  They  are  cited  as  Dr.  MSS.  52J50,  the 
first  number  being  the  volume,  the  second  the  page  and  the 
letter  (J)  the  library  symbol  for  the  Clark  MSS.  I  went  through 
these  volumes  and  had  copies  made  of  all  the  manuscripts  which 
would  be  of  value  to  me.  Most  of  the  copies  were  from  original 
documents,  but,  since  on  the  copies  it  was  not  indicated  whether 
they  were  from  original  manuscripts  or  copies,  I  have  not  dared 
trust  to  my  memory  to  indicate  this  distinction  in  the  footnotes. 
I  have  made  some  use  of  other  collections  in  the  Draper  Manu- 
scripts, particularly  the  Harmar  MSS.  These  are  copies  made  by 
Mr.  Draper. 

5.  Haldimand  Collection:  Frederick  Haldimand  was  ap- 
pointed governor  of  Canada  in  September,  1777,  and  held  this 
position  until  1784.  During  this  time  his  correspondence  was 
large  and  this  he  carefully  preserved.  It  is  now  in  the  British 
Museum  and  the  Public  Record  Office  in  London.  The  collec- 
tion contains  the  letters,  reports  made  to  him,  and  copies  of  im- 
portant papers  which  were  enclosed  in  these.  The  Canadian 
Archives  has  had  transcripts  of  this  collection  made  and  has 
calendared  it  in  its  Reports.     The  copies  I  have  used  were  made 

1  See  supra  pp.  ciii.,  n.  3,  cxxxviii. 

2  Thwaites,  Descriptive  List  of  MSS.  Collections. 


cUv  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

from  the  Canadian  transcripts.  These  are  cited  as  Can.  Archives ^ 
B.,  etc.  Many  of  these  have  been  printed  in  the  Michigan  Pio- 
neer and  Historical  Collections  and  the  Illinois  Historical  Collec- 
tions, Vol.  I. 

6.  Papers  of  Old  Congress:^  Many  petitions  with  enclosures 
were  sent  by  the  people  of  Illinois  to  Congress.  These  have 
recently  been  transferred  to  the  library  of  Congress. 

7.  Collection  of  Virginia  State  Library:  There  is  a  quantity 
of  unused  manuscripts  in  Richmond,  to  which  I  have  had  partial 
access ;  but,  since  they  have  not  been  catalogued,  there  are  many 
important  documents  which  I  have  not  seen. 

8.  Miscellanies:  I  have  used  letters  and  documents  in  the 
possession  of  other  institutions  and  several  private  individuals, 
to  which  references  are  made  in  the  proper  places. 

It  is  to  be  regretted  that  I  have  not  seen  several  important 
collections,  which  might  have  thrown  light  on  the  subject.  They 
are  the  following:  Private  library  of  C.  M.  Burton  of  Detroit, 
Michigan ;  collection  of  documents  from  Vincennes  in  Vincennes 
University  and  Indianapolis  Public  Library;  private  library  of 
Colonel  R.  T.  Durrett  of  Louisville,  Kentucky;  and  the  Bancroft 
Library  of  the  University  of  California. 

The  printed  sources  for  the  history  of  the  county  of  Illinois 
are  numerous,  and  an  effort  has  been  made  to  see  everything. 
Those  used  will  be  found  listed  in  the  bibliography  at  the  end  of 
this  volume. 

After  considerable  study  of  the  problems  of  transcription  and 
translation,  I  determined  to  make  the  former  as  similar  to  the 
manuscript  in  every  particular  as  the  printed  page  will  permit. 
For  this  reason  the  superior  letters  and  repetitions  have  been 
retained,  as  being  very  characteristic  of  the  methods  of  the  writers. 
All  erasures,  however,  have  been  omitted,  after  a  careful  con- 
sideration of  each  case  had  made  it  certain  that  no  information 
of  value  would  be  lost  thereby.  Insertions  made  by  the  clerk  in 
the  margin  have  been  included  in  their  proper  places  in  the  text. 

'  A  practically  complete  inventory  of  these  papers  is  printed  in  "Bulletin  of  the  Bureau 
of  Rolls  and  Library,"  No.  i. 


INTRODUCTION  civ 

The  punctuation  and  paragraphing  have  been  copied  as  in  the 
original,  with  the  exception  of  the  periods  placed  at  the  end  of 
each  paragraph.  These  are  not  always  found  in  the  text.  There 
were  numerous  cases  of  doubtful  paragraphing,  each  of  which 
has  been  decided  in  accordance  with  what  seemed  to  be  the  in- 
tention of  the  clerk.  In  order  to  save  space  the  list  of  judges  is 
printed  in  double  instead  of  single  columns,  as  is  the  rule  in  the 
record.  Occasionally  I  have  inserted  a  word  in  brackets  which 
had  been  omitted  by  accident  or  torn  out.  Brackets  throughout 
the  volume  indicate  insertions  by  the  editor,  the  word  or  words 
being  in  roman  letters,  where  an  evident  omission  or  mistake  by 
the  original  writer ;  in  italics,  when  merely  an  explanation.  Assur- 
ance of  the  correctness  of  the  transcription  in  cases  of  bizarre 
speUing,  etc.,  has  been  indicated  by  the  conventional  sic,  which 
has  been  used  only  when  the  mistake  appeared  very  extraordinary 
or  might  be  thought  an  oversight  in  the  proof-reading.  The  writers 
of  these  records,  like  many  of  their  contemporaries,  preferred  the 
phonetic  to  the  historic  spelling.  The  most  common  mistakes  are 
made  in  the  vowel  before  the  nasals  and  in  the  endings  6  and  er, 
these  latter  being  spelled  in  any  way  that  will  produce  the  sound. 
Frequently  the  pronunciation  of  an  unrecognized  word  will  lead 
to  its  identification.  To  the  duplication  and  transposing  of 
letters  are  due  such  forms  as  defjendeur,  effest,  defjucnt.  In  tran- 
scribing I  have  followed  this  principle,  that,  when  there  was  a 
legitimate  choice  between  an  apparent  bizarre  spelling  and  a 
possibly  correct  one,  preference  should  be  given  to  the  latter.  I 
feel  quite  confident  that  the  number  of  mistakes  in  the  transcrip- 
tion is  very  small,  for,  in  the  preparation  of  the  manuscript  and  in 
proof-reading,  Mrs.  Alvord  has  collated  it  twice  with  the  originals 
and  I  have  made  five  such  comparisons.  This  is  true  of  all  the 
transcriptions  except  those  of  the  Cahokia  records  in  Chicago, 
for  which  I  have  had  to  trust  to  my  original  copies. 

The  translation  of  the  records  has  offered  many  difficulties, 
due  largely  to  the  haste  with  which  the  clerk  was  obliged  to 
write  the  testimony  as  he  heard  it.  The  sentences  are  frequently 
involved,   abbreviated,   or  not  finished.     The  French  is  on  the 


civi  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

whole  good,  by  no  means  a  patois,^  and  the  legal  phraseology 
excellent,  particularly  that  of  Joseph  Labuxiere,  who  was  a  well- 
trained  notary.  In  making  the  translation  I  have  had  in  mind 
the  needs  of  the  many  readers  who  do  not  understand  the  original 
language.  The  first  requisite  in  such  a  work  has  seemed  to  be 
a  faithful  and  clear  interpretation,  which  should  follow  closely  the 
original  rather  than  the  production  of  a  piece  of  finished  English. 
Since  the  translation  may  be  used  by  the  reader  of  French  as  a 
running  commentary,  it  has  obviated  the  need  of  numerous 
footnotes  to  the  text.  All  proper  names  have  been  spelled  in  the 
translation  in  accordance  with  the  following  principle:  in  all 
cases  where  I  have  found  a  signature,  that  spelling  has  been 
adopted ;  in  all  other  cases,  the  modern  form  as  found  in  Canada 
has  been  used,  provided  identification  was  possible. 

1.  I  would  not  undertake  to  pronounce  upon  the  character  of  the  written  French 
without  the  support  of  other  authority.  A  French  traveler  to  the  village  of 
Vincennes  in  the  eighteenth  century  was  surprised  to  find  that  the  language  of  the  people 
was  not  a  patois  as  he  had  been  led  to  expect.  (Volney,  View  of  the  United  States,  373; 
see  also  Flagg,  Far  West,  in  Thwaites,  Western  Travels,  xxxvii.,  55.)  Mr.  Benjamin  Suite, 
who  has  read  the  proof  of  this  book ,  writes  that  the  French  is  next  to  the  best  and  the 
legal  phraseology  excellent.  My  colleague,  Professor  Thomas  E.  Oliver  of  the  depart- 
ment of  modern  languages,  who  has  given  me  great  assistance  in  the  translation,  laid 
down  the  principle  for  guidance  in  the  interpretation  of  difficult  passages  that  aside  from 
misspelling  and  abbreviated  sentences,  the  writers  follow  the  correct  usage.  By  the  appli- 
cation of  this  principle  many  difficult  problems  of  translation  have  been  solved. 


PETITION  TO   CLARK ' 

To  George  Rogers  Clark  Esq'r  CoUonel  and  Commandant 
of  the  Eastern  Illinois  &ca. 

The  Pettition  of  Jean  B*«  DeCoste. 
Humbly  Sheweth  — 
That  he  has  had  a  Considerable  demand  against  M^  Hanson 
of  this  Town  and  has  never  been  able  to  make  him  answer  thereto, 
and  the  Petitioner  having  heard  that  the  said  M^  Hanson  is  about 
leaving  this  Place  he  has  recours  to  you,  begging  you  will  be 
Pleased  to  order  the  said  Hanson  not  to  depart  without  giving 
suflacient  security  for  the  Settlement  of  the  affair  between  him 
and  the  Plaintif  and  will  ever  as  in  duty  bound  pray  &c. — 
Kah6s  the  27*^  Aug*  1778. 
his 
Jno.  Bte.  +  De  Coste. 
mark. 
Ce  que  J.  B.  De  Coste  a  payer  pour  la  Societte 

Ib^       S     D 

pay  sur  leur  Billet  de  son  propre 3327.     i4-     6 

paye  un  Billet  120  ^^  peletier 240. 

paye  un  autre  193  ^^     Di  386. 

L3953.     14.     6 
De  Coste  a  paye  Hanson     1976.     17.     3 

3347-     14-     3 
135- 


3482.     14.     3 

1  Original  manuscript;  Chicago  Hist.  Soc,  Cahokia  Records.  Transcription  by  the  editor. 
These  records  were  formerly  in  the  treasurer's  office  of  the  courthouse  in  Belleville,  111. 
Alvord,  Eighteenth  Century  French  Records,  in  Annual  Report  of  Amer.  Hist.  Assn.,  1905, 
»•,  365- 

2  Livre,  which  was  equivalent  to  the  modern  jranc. 


STRAY  LEAVES  FROM  THE  COURT  OF  THE  COM- 
MITTEE OF  CAHOKIA^ 

Islinois  ss 
By  ordre  of  the  Committe  of  Cahds 
II  est  ordonner  a  M^  Antoine  Harmand  d*^  Sanfafon  de  parroitre 
devant  la  Cour  de  Committee  des  Cahos  Vendredy  prochain 
trent  du  present  mois  pour  repondre  a  la  Demand  de  Dominique 
O'flanigan  a  cela  vous  manquera  point  et  de  celluy  faite  votre 
retour  Donne  au  Kahos  29™  d'Octo^  1778^ 

a  Mons  Gab^  Constante  Richard  M'  Carty  Clke' 

pour  Signifier  celluy 

Virginie  Illinois  ss 

By  Joseph  Bowman*  Esq.  Capt.  Commandant,  Presid*  of  the 
Court  of  Cah6s  &ca.  &ca. 

Whereas  Mr.  De  Breuil  of  St.  Louis  makes  complaint  to  me 
that  M^  Antoine  Lepage  of  St.  Josephs  is  indebted  unto  him  in 
the  Sum  of  eighty  eight  livres  five  Sols  Peletries  by  his  note  of 
hand  Dated  ii*^  January  1770.  and  tho'  several  times  Demanded 

1  Original  manuscripts;  Chi.  Hist.  Soc,  Cah.  Rec.  Transcription  by  the  editor.  The 
first  is  the  earliest  known  document  issuing  from  the  court  established  by  G.  R.  Clark  at 
Cahokia.    See  Introdiiclion,  p.  xlvi. 

2  Translation:  "M.  Antoine  Harmand  called  Sansfafon  is  summoned  to  appear  before 
the  Court  of  the  Committee  of  Cahokia  Friday  next,  the  thirtieth  of  the  present  month,  to 
answer  the  prayer  of  Dominique  O'Flanigan.  In  this  you  shall  not  fail  and  make  tliereof  your 
return.  Given  at  Cahokia,  October  29,  1778.  To  Gabriel  Constant,  to  make  service  there- 
of.    Richard  McCarty,  Clerk." 

3  Richard  McCarty  came  from  the  colony  of  Connecticut.  He  was  living  in  Cahokia  before 
1776,  and  built  a  mill  there  on  some  land  he  had  preempted.  See  pp.  465,  529.  At  the  coming 
of  Clark,  he  joined  the  Illinois  battalion  and  took  part  in  the  Vincennes  expedition.  In  the  fall 
of  1779  he  was  appointed  commandant  of  Fort  Bowman  at  Cahokia  and  made  himself  very 
unpopular  with  the  inhabitants  by  his  tyranny.  Later  he  joined  the  French  party  and  was 
killed  in  the  spring  of  1781  while  carrying  a  petition  from  the  inhabitants  to  the  governor  of 
Virginia.     See  Introduction,  pp.  Ixxiii.,  xcvii.,  ciii.;  also  post,  pp.  543,  549. 

*  Joseph  Bowman  was  one  of  the  captains  with  Clark  in  the  Illinois  expedition  and  was 
sent  by  the  latter  to  receive  the  submission  of  Cahokia.  He  remained  in  command  of  the 
village  till  the  Vincennes  expedition  and  seems  to  have  won  the  hearts  of  the  French.  After 
his  return  from  Vincennes  he  remained  in  Cahokia  for  a  short  time.  He  established  the  first 
popular  court  of  justice  in  the  Illinois  and  was  himself  elected  to  the  position  of  president  of 
the  same.  For  further  particulars  see  Introduction,  p.  xlvi.  He  died  at  Vincennes,  August 
14,  1779.— English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  i.,  108  et  seq. 


CAHOKIA  RECORDS,   1 778  3 

hath  not  been  paid  and  whereas  said  D  Breuil  is  afraid  If  said 
Ant'^®  Lapage  Leaves  this  Country  that  he  will  Loose  his  said 
Debt. 

These  are  therefore  in  vertue  of  the  Power  and  authority  to 
me  Given  to  Command  you  to  Seize  so  much  of  the  Effects  of  the 
Said  Antoine  Lapage  If  to  be  found  in  this  district  to  pay  & 
Satisfie  said  Debt  &  Costs  (or  that  Sd.  Lapage  pays  Sd.  sum  & 
Costs,)  and  them  safely  keep,  return  whereof  make  to  next  fryday 
the  27*^  Ins*  Court  of  Committee  hereof  fail  not  this  being  your 
Sufficient  Warrant. 

Given  under  my  hand  at  Fort  Bowman  24*^  of  Nov.  1778. 

Jos.  Bowman. 
To  Gab.  Constant  constable  this  to  execute 

En  vertue  de  cet  Warrant,  je  a  6te  a  la  requisition  de  M*^  De 
Breuil,  je  a  saisd  une  Barrique  de  taffea  dans  la  maison  de  M' 
Lapage,  de  laquelle  M^  Ant.  Girardin  sa  rendue  Caution  au 
Cahds  24  de  Nov^  1778.  , 

Gabriel  Constant. 

II  est  due  encore  64^^  15  Sols  en  peletries  et  les  frais.^ 

1  Translation:     "In   virtue  of  this  warrant  and  on  the  requisition  of  M.  Dubreuil,  I 
have  attached  a  barrel  of  tafia  in  the  house  of  M.  Lepage,  for  which  M.  Ant.  Girardin  has 

ijiven  bond.  At  Cahokia  November  24,  1778,  Gabriel  Constant.  There  is  still  due  64 
ivres  15  sols  and  the  costs."  ^ 

The  sol  is  the  modern  sou,  and  was  pronounced  like  it. 


COURT  OF  THE  COMMITTEE  AT  CAHOKIA^ 

[ist  sheet] 
Execu    .  .  [MS.  torn]  .  .  ecuring   any   slave   so  found  in  the 
.  .  [MS.  torn]  .  .  or  elsewhere,  Contrary  to  this  order,  and  to  in- 
form &  prosecute  in  behalf  of  the  Publick  any  other  person  that 
Should  act  Contrary  to  the  same 

Thursday  31'*  Dec^  1778. 
Joseph  Bowman  Esq^  Capt  Touranjeau 

M^.  Langlois  M'".  Gratiot 

Present^ 
Bap*  Bastien  Neagor  of  M^  Saucier  alias  of  Belcour  call'd  & 
Examined  touching  his  Poisoning  the  negor  of  Marie  Laurant  of 
St  Louis  as  s^  neagor  hath  Declared.^ 

^  Four  leaves  from  the  record  of  the  court  founded  by  George  Rogers  Clark  in  the  archives 
of  the  courthouse  at  Belleville,  111.  They  have  been  bound  by  mistake  with  the  Minutes 
of  General  Court  of  Illinois  Territory,  St.  Clair  Co.,  April  term,  1811.  Transcription  by  the 
editor.     Except  for  the  time  of  the  Vincennes  expedition,  McCarty  was  clerk. 

2  For  the  convenience  of  repeated  reference,  all  biographical  notes  on  those  who  were  living 
in  Cahokia  in  the  year  1787  will  be  found  with  the  census  of  that  year,  p.  624.  Notes  on  others 
will  appear  in  their  proper  place  and  may  be  found  by  consulting  the  index. 

The  full  name  of  Turanjeau  was  Pierre  Godin  called  Turanjeau.     He  died  in  1779. 

The  parents  of  Charles  Gratiot  were  French,  but  on  account  of  their  Huguenot  faith  were 
dwelling  in  Switzerland,  when  their  son  Charles  was  born  in  the  year  1753.  Charles  Gratiot 
received  a  mercantile  education^  and  before  he  reached  his  majority  went  to  Canada  to  engage 
in  the  fur  trade.  In  1777  he  was  in  Cahokia  and  in  August  of  the  next  year  opened  a  store  in 
partnership  with  some  British  merchants  from  Canada,  although  in  the  month  before  Illinois  had 
submitted  to  the  Virginians.  From  letters  of  his  it  appears  that  he  maintained  relations  with 
his  uncle  in  Canada  and  probably  with  his  partners  as  long  as  he  remained  in  Cahokia.  He 
gave  financial  assistance  to  Clark,  as  did  all  the  other  French  inhabitants.  Gratiot  was  elected  a 
justice  of  the  court  established  by  Clark  and  later  of  the  court  at  Cahokia  under  the  county  of 
Illinois.  Finding  the  conditions  on  the  American  bank  too  stormy  for  his  business  interests, 
he  moved  to  St.  Louis  in  1781,  where  he  became  wealthy  and  prominent.  His  sons  held  many 
important  positions  in  public  life.  Charles  Gratiot  was  a  cultivated  man,  traveled  extensively 
both  in  this  country  and  Europe  and  was  favorably  known  both  for  his  business  capacity  and 
social  qualities.  Wisconsiyt  Hist.  Col.,  x,  239  et  seq.;  Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers;  Dillon, 
Annals  of  St.  Louis,  I.,  214,  481  et  seq. 

3  See  Transcripts  from  the  Cahokia  Record,  p.  13.  The  following  is  the  translation  of  a 
document  of  the  Cah.  Rec.  in  the  Chicago  Hist.  Soc.  lib.:  "The  year  1778,  the  29th 
day  of  December  at  3  o'clock  in  the  afternoon,  in  virtue  of  the  order  of  Don  Fernando  de 
Leyba,  lieutenant  governor  of  the  Illinois,  which  was  given  me  this  day,  I,  Bernard  Gibkins, 
physician  at  this  post,  betook  myself  into  the  house  of  the  v/oman  Laurant,  inhabitant  of  this 
post,  in  order  to  examine  her  negro.  I  found  the  said  negro  in  bed,  and  after  a  careful  exam- 
ination, I  perceived  that  the  sickness,  by  which  he  was  attacked,  proceeded  frorn  a  violent 
poison.  His  body  was  in  convulsions  and  his  limbs  rigid  on  account  pf  the  corrosive  poison, 
which  had  insinuated  itself  into  all  parts  of  his  body.  The  negro  is  in  danger  of  death  and 
it  vrill  be  only  the  result  of  chance,  if  he  recovers;  in  which  case  the  use  of  his  limbs  may 
be  lost  for  the  rest  of  his  days.  In  faith  of  which  I  give  the  present  report,  which  I  affirm 
to  be  true,  to  you,  M.  Lieutenant-Governor.  At  St.  Louis  the  said  day,  the  29th  of  December, 
1778.     B.  Gibkins." 


From  a  photograph  of  a  crayon  portrait,  in  the  library  of  the  Missouri  Historical  Society. 


CLARK'S  COURT  AT  CAHOKIA  .  5 

Questioned  whither  he  gave  any  Cake  or  anything  Else  to  eat 
to  s^  Neagor. 

answers  that  s'^  neagor  met  him  and  after  salutations  s^  neagor 
says,  I  am  told  you  intend  fighting  with  me.  I  asked  for  what,  on 
acco*  of  Martin's  wench,  oh  Brother  says  I.  we  shall  never 
Quarelle  for  that  your  Country  people  besides  she  is  every  ones 
Whore,  therefore  shall  never  Quarelle  about  that,  after  which 
s^  neagor  s^  he  had  a  peine  in  his  Breast.  I  asked  him  if  he  had 
over  strained  himself,  he  s^  not  unless  it  was  by  Carrying  30 
Bush'  of  Corn  that  day  into  the  Garret,  and  that  he  Neither  Eat  or 
Drank  with  Him  nor  gave  him  Even  a  pipe  of  Tobacco. 

Bap*  Le  Neagor  d'M^  Robert.  Declare  n 'avoir  Veu  Donne 
p^  Bastienne  au'cune  Gallet  ni  autre  chose  a  man[ger]  ou  k  Boir 
a  la  d*^  Neagor  de  M^  Laurant. 

B*  neagor  of  M^  Robert  Declares  that  he  did  not  see  Bastienne 
give  Cake  or  any  other  thing  to  Eat  or  Drink  to  M^  Laurant's 
Neagor. 

the  other  neagor  .  .  [MS.  torn]  .  .  he  was  at  no  Place  with 
the  neagor  of  M*^  Laurant  except  at  his  masters  house  where  he 
gave  him  a  Glass  of  wine  as  he  was  going  off  that  he  did  not 
see  Bastienne  with  him. 

Thursday  7*^  January  1779. 
Michel  Beaulieu  vs  L^  LaCompte 

a  Summons  to  appear  fryday  8*^  to  answer  such  alligations 
which  shall  be  made  against  him  with  his  witness  if  he  has  any. 

a  summons  to  appear  fryday  8^^  to  give  Testemony  in  the 
above  Cause.     Jean  Racette  &  Haugon  La  Croix. 
Fryday  8*^  January  1779. 
Jos.  Bowman  Esq^  M^  Langlois 

Cap*  Trottier  M^  Graciot 

Present 
M^  Beaulieu  vs  L^  LaCompte 

Pit  Demands  that  proves  what  he  has  advanced  to  M*"  Lan- 
glois, that  he  M^.  Beaulieu  said  to  his  Neagor  take  care  dont 
Confess  anything  or  you  will  be  hanged. 

Defend*  say's  he  heard  it  from  Jean  Raccette,  who  say's  he 


6  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTION 

heard  it  said  at  the  Court  house  the  day  the  neagor's  were  punish- 
ed but  of  whom  or  from  whom  he  dont  kno'. 

Louis  Louisgaut  Sworn,  that  M'"  LaCroix  told  him  in  the  street, 
after  the  neagor  of  La  Croix  was  whiped  that  M^  Beaulieu 
staid  in  the  C*  house  with  him,  and  that  LaCroix  said  I  believe 
Beaulieu  tells  his  neagor  not  to  Confess  or  you  will  be  hanged. 

[2nd  sheet]^ 

sworn  into  office  as  President  of  the  Court  of  Committee  at 
Cahos. 

Lieu*  Perrault,  Presidant        M^  Girirdin 
M^  Graciot  M'^  Trouttier 

Present. 

[MS.  lorn]  . .  Complains  to  the  C*  that  whereas  he  has  .  . 
[MS.  torn]  .  .  several  artecals  to  M'"  Wills  &  has  Received  his 
money  in  Payment  thereof?  &  as  the  money  is  now  Cried  down 
in  the  Vilage  he  Demands  that  the  said  Wells  should  gave  [sic] 
further  security  for  the  goodness  of  the  money  before  he  shoud 
take  the  affects  out  of  the  vilage.^ 

M^  Wells  in  answer  says  that  he  Bought  the  artecals  of  the 
said  Marthan  &  as  he  is  a  man  fair  from  home  and  on  Business, 
therefore  he  Desires  that  the  C*  would  Either  Prove  it  and 
Condemn  his  money  to  be  bad,  or  if  not  to  Gave  [sic]  him  his 
Effects  that  he  Bought  of  said  Marthan  and  that  he  Does  not 
understand  that  the  Voice  of  any  Disaffected  Person  should 
without  any  Lawfull  grounds  be  hurtfull  to  his  trading  in  this 
Country  as  he  has  a  Proper  Passport  from  all  the  officers  of 
Post  on  the  Ohio  River  &  that  he  Could  Prove  that  M^ 
Marthan  Refused  to   Deliver  the  affects. 

Mr.  Bournes  sworn  says  that  this  morning  s^  Marthan  came 
to  M^  Wells  Lodging  and  said  that  s^  marthan  Refused  to  . .  [MS. 
torn]  . .  go  out  of  the  Village  without  .  .  [MS.  torn]  . .  Further 
security  for  the  goodness  of  the  Currency  that  wells  had  Payed  him. 

Mr.  Wells  further  says  that  if  any  Person  would  Come  before 

1  The  first  and  fourth  sheets  are  in  McCarty's  handwriting  and  the  other  two  were  written 
by  some  one  else. 

2  On  the  assurance  of  the  Virginians  the  French  accepted  in  payment  for  their  supplies  the 
continental  paper  at  face  value  in  gold.  It  was  not  until  the  winter  of  1779  that  they  began 
to  suspect  that  they  had  been  deceived.    The  above  is  the  earliest  reference  to  their  suspicions. 


CLARK'S  COURT  AT  CAHOKIA  7 

the  C*  and  Refuse  to  take  the  said  money  for  Payment  of  Debt  that 
upon  the  same  he  would  Gave  good  security  for  his  Remain- 
ing in  this  Place  till  Col  Clark  some  other  officer  should  Return 
to  this  Place  that  was  Proper  Judges  of  the  s^  money. 

Upon  which  Mr.  Marthan  sent  for  Jos  Beautheau  whome  he 
said  Refused  to  take  the  money  for  a  note  he  had  Given  him  s*^ 
Beautheau  said  that  he  did  not  Demand  his  Payment  as  not  Being 
Due  till  spring  Come  a  Year  so  he  had  not  Refused  any  sort  of 
Payment  that  was  LawfuU. 

[3d  sheet] 
Lieut  Perrault  President  M**.  Beaulieu 

Cap*  Trouttier  M^.  Girirdin 

M^  Graciot  Present 

Louis  Lasoudray  Pltf  M^"  Deneau  &  M^  LaPadge  Deft 
M^  Deneau  &  M^  LaPadge  appeared  the  third  time  to  satisfy 
themselves  of  the  Crime  laid  to  their  Charge  [and]  no  Person 
Came  to  Prosecute  them  &  They  Declared  themselves  Innocent 
of  The  Crime  laid  to  their  Charge.  The  Honorable  Court  There- 
fore thought  Proper  to  Dis[charge]  them  and  Clare  them  of  the 
said  Crime  laid  [to]  their  Charge  &c  ordering  that  the  said 
Lasoudray  [shou]ld  pay  all  Cost  and  Expence  whatsoever  the 
said  [De]neau  and  La  Padge  has  been  at  to  Justify  themselves  of 
this  Hanious  Crime  Laid  to  their  charge  also  Gaving  The  said 
Deneau  &  LaPadge  Privalage  to  Prosicute  the  said  Lasoudray  for 
the  same  on  the  other  side. 
Adjourned     M^  Perrault. 

Fryday  the  2°^  day  of  April  1779. 
C*  Oppened.     , 

Lieut  Perrault  Presidant  M^  Graciot 

Cap*  Trouttier  M^  Touranjeau 

Present. 

J.  B*  LaCrodc  P1£F.  vs  IMichel  Charle  Deft. 

J.  B*  LaCroix  Complains    to   the    Court   that  whereas  he 

Engaged  Micheal  Charle  in  his  service  for  the  space  of  one  y[ear] 

and  his  time  of  servace  not  yet  Being  accomplish[ed]  Refuses  to 

serve  him  any  longer  &  Therefore  . .  [MS.  torn] . .  to  kno.  some 


8  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTION 

lawful  Reason  for  his  so  doing,  s^  Charle  in  his  defence  says 
that  the  said  La[Croix]  imposed  upon  him  too  hard  by  ordering 
him  to  [work]  late  &  Early  &  in  the  night  which  he  Refused  [MS. 
torn]  upon  which  they  had  some  Despute  after  which  he  the  s^ 
Charle  Left  his  house  &  Refused  to  serve  him  any  longer. 
After  Desputing  some  time  between  the .  .  [MS.  torn] 

[4th  sheet] 
him  do  it  and  that  it  was  with  this  Depo*  Gun. 
C^  are  of  opinion  that  it  was  not  the  shot  Caused  the  Death  of 
the  .  .[MS.  torn]  ^ 

Pit.  to  pay  costs. 
Jacque  Method  Pit  vs  Renoch  Locat  Deft  for  his  sister  M*^ 
yve  Method 

Pit  Demands  the  rent-  of  3  years  for  a  piece  of  Land  Deft  has 
occupied  amount'g  to  99^^  in  Pelet[ries]. 

Def^  says  there  is  no  writing  to  produce  and  Desire's  to  kno 
in  whose  Name  s^  Lands  were  Cried  to  hire  and  B  Method  Pfts 
Brother  held  said  Land,  only  for  making  the  fence. 

C^  are  unanimous  of  oppinion  that  the  widow  has  no  Right  to 
pay  any  Part  of  rent,  &  Pit  to  pay  Costs. 
C^  adjourned  to  fryday  next  30th.  Ap^  Inst. 

Jos  Bowman 
Fryday  30th.  April  1779. 
Major  J^  Bowman  Presid^         L*  Beaulieu 
Madame  Capitaine,  by  authority  from  her  Husband  desires 
to  give  up  a  house  Bought  of  Deceased  M^  De  Lintot,  being  in- 
capable of   paying  the  same.  M^  McCarty  the  Executor  named 
by  this  Court,  in  consequence  of  her  giving  up  same  prays  that 
the  Court  will  order  that  said  house  be  sold  by  publick  outcry 
for   the   paying  a  Certain  Sum  due  on  said  house  by  said  M'^ 
Delintots  Estate,  p^  mortgage  to  Mad°^  Detolsey  and  the  over- 
plush  If  any  for  the  Good  of  his  s^  Lintots  Creditors. 

Members  not  being  present  Sufficent  to  form  a  majority 
ajourned  to  fryday  next  the  7th.  May. 

Fryday  7th.  May  1779. 
Jo"  Bowman  Presid<^  Cap*  Touranjeau 

Cap^  Trottier  L*  Beaulieu 

members  Present. 


ACT  CREATING  THE  COUNTY  OF  ILLINOIS^ 

AN  ACT  for  establishing  the  County  of  Ilinois,  and  for  the 
more  effectual  protection  and  defense  thereof. 

Whereas  by  a  successful  expedition  carried  on  by  the  Vir- 
ginia militia,  on  the  western  side  of  the  Ohio  river,  several  of  the 
British  posts  within  the  territory  of  this  commonwealth,  in  the 
country  adjacent  to  the  river  Mississippi,  have  been  reduced,  and 
the  inhabitants  have  acknowledged  themselves  citizens  thereof, 
and  taken  the  oath  of  fidelity  to  the  same,  and  the  good  faith  and 
safety  of  the  commonwealth  require  that  the  said  citizens  should 
be  supported  and  protected  by  speedy  and  effectual  reinforce- 
ments, which  will  be  the  best  means  of  preventing  the  inroads 
and  depredations  of  the  Indians  upon  the  inhabitants  to  the  west- 
ward of  the  Allegheny  mountains;  and  whereas,  from  their  remote 
situation,  it  may  at  this  time  be  difficult,  if  not  impracticable, 
to  govern  them  by  the  present  laws  of  this  commonwealth,  until 
proper  information,  by  intercourse  with  their  fellow  citizens,  on 
the  east  side  of  the  Ohio,  shall  have  familiarised  them  to  the  same, 
and  it  is  therefore  expedient  that  some  temporary  form  of  govern- 
ment, adapted  to  their  circumstances,  should  in  the  meantime  be 
established : 

Be  it  enacted  by  the  General  Assembly ^  That  all  the  citizens  of 
this  commonwealth  who  are  already  settled,  or  shall  hereafter 
settle,  on  the  western  side  of  the  Ohio  aforesaid,  shall  be  included 

1  Hening,  Statutes  at  Large  (Virginia),  ix.,  552.  A  committee  was  instructed  by  the  Vir- 
ginia assembly  on  November  19,  1778,  to  prepare  a  bill  for  the  formation  of  the  county. 
This  was  presented  to  the  assembly  November  30,  1778,  and  passed  in  its  final  amended  form 
on  December  9th.  It  was  signed  by  the  speaker  of  the  senate  on  the  17th  and  subsequently, 
if  at  all,  by  the  speaker  of  the  house  of  delegates.  On  the  12th  of  December  Governor  Patridc 
Henry  issued  the  instructions  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  the  act. — Jojir.  H.  of  Del. 
(Va.),  Oct.  Sess.,  1778,  p.  106;  Jour,  of  Senate  (Va.),  Oct.  Sess.,  1778,  p.  52;  Rowland,  George 
Mason,  i.,  307;  Boggess,  Immigration  into  Illinois,  1778-1830  (a  thesis  in  manuscript).  Dr. 
Boggess  was  the  first  to  work  out  the  history  of  the  act,  and  I  am  greatly  indebted  to  him  for 
the  loan  of  the  thesis,  from  which  this  note  is  taken.  No  writer  had  previously  determined  the 
exact  date  of  the  passage  of  the  act  and  all  but  one  (Rowland,  George  Mason)ha.vt  been  indefinite 
or  incorrect  in  giving  it. — Winsor,  Westward  Movement,  122;  Poole,  in  Winsor,  Nar.  and 
Grit.  Hist.,  vi.,  729;  Thwaites,  How  George  Rogers  Clark  Won  the  Northwest,  64;  Boyd,  in 
Amer.  Hist.  Rev.  iv.,  623;  Roosevelt,  Winning  of  the  West,  ii.,  168;  and  many  others. 


lo  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTION 

in  a  distinct  county,  which  shall  be  called  Illinois  county;  and 
that  the  governour  of  this  commonwealth,  with  the  advice  of  the 
council,  may  appoint  a  county  lieutenant  or  commandant  in  chief 
in  that  county,  during  pleasure,  who  shall  appoint  and  commission 
so  many  deputy  commandants,  militia  officers,  and  commissaries, 
as  he  shall  think  proper  in  the  different  districts,  during  pleasure, 
all  of  whom,  before  they  enter  into  office,  shall  take  the  oath  of 
fidelity  to  this  commonwealth  and  the  oath  of  office,  according 
to  their  own  religion,  which  the  inhabitants  shall  fully,  and  to 
all  intents  and  purposes  enjoy,  together  with  all  their  civil  rights 
and  property.  And  all  civil  officers  to  which  the  said  inhabitants 
have  been  accustomed,  necessary  for  the  preservation  of  peace  and 
the  administration  of  justice,  shall  be  chosen  by  a  majority  of  the 
citizens  in  their  respective  districts,  to  be  convened  for  that  pur- 
pose by  the  county  lieutenant  or  commandant,  or  his  deputy,  and 
shall  be  commissioned  by  the  said  county  lieutenant  or  command- 
ant in  chief,  and  be  paid  for  their  services  in  the  same  manner 
as  such  expenses  have  been  heretofore  borne,  levied,  and  paid  in 
that  county;  which  said  civil  officers,  after  taking  the  oaths  as 
before  prescribed,  shall  exercise  their  several  jurisdictions,  and 
conduct  themselves  agreeable  to  the  laws  which  the  present  set- 
tlers are  now  accustomed  to.  And  on  any  criminal  prosecution, 
where  the  offender  shall  be  adjudged  guilty,  it  shall  and  may  be 
lawful  for  the  county  lieutenant  or  commandant  in  chief  to  pardon 
his  or  her  offense,  except  in  cases  of  murder  and  treason ;  and  in 
such  cases,  he  may  respite  execution  from  time  to  time,  until  the 
sense  of  the  governour  in  the  first  instance,  and  of  the  general 
assembly  in  the  case  of  treason,  is  obtained.  But  where  any 
officers,  directed  to  be  appointed  by  this  act,  are  such  as  the  inhab- 
itants have  been  unused  to,  it  shall  and  may  be  lawful  for  the 
governour,  with  the  advice  of  the  council,  to  draw  a  warrant  or 
warrants  on  the  treasury  of  this  commonwealth  for  the  payment 
of  the  salaries  of  such  officers,  so  as  the  sum  or  sums  drawn  for 
do  not  exceed  the  sum  of  five  hundred  pounds,  anything  herein 
to  the  contrary  notwithstanding. 

And  for  the  protection  and  deffence  of  the  said  county  and  its 


COUNTY  OF  ILLINOIS  ACT  ii 

inhabitants,  Be  it  enacted.  That  it  shall  and  may  be  lawful  for  the 
govemour,  with  the  advice  of  the  council,  forthwith  to  order, 
raise,  and  levy,  either  by  voluntary  enlistments,  or  detachments 
from  the  militia,  five  hundred  men,  with  proper  ofiicers,  to  march 
immediately  into  the  said  county  of  Ilinois,  to  garrison  such  forts 
or  stations  already  taken,  or  which  it  may  be  proper  to  take  there 
or  elsewhere,  for  protecting  the  said  county,  and  for  keeping  up 
our  communication  with  them,  and  also  with  the  Spanish  settle- 
ments, as  he,  with  the  advice  aforesaid,  shall  direct.  And  the 
said  governour,  with  the  advice  of  the  council,  shall  from  time  to 
time,  until  further  provision  shall  be  made  for  the  same  by  the 
general  assembly,  continue  to  relieve  the  said  volunteers,  or  militia, 
by  other  enlistments  or  detachments,  as  herein  before  directed, 
and  to  issue  warrants  on  the  treasurer  of  this  commonwealth  for 
all  charges  and  expenses  accruing  thereon,  which  the  said  treas- 
urer is  hereby  required  to  pay  accordingly. 

And  he  it  jarther  enacted,  That  it  shall  and  may  be  lawful  for 
the  governour,  with  the  advice  of  the  council,  to  take  such  meas- 
ures as  they  shall  judge  most  expedient  or  the  necessity  of  the 
case  requires,  for  supplying  the  said  inhabitants  as  well  as  our 
friendly  Indians  in  those  parts,  with  goods  and  other  necessaries , 
either  by  opening  a  communication  and  trade  with  New  Orleans, 
or  otherwise,  and  to  appoint  proper  persons  for  managing  and 
conducting  the  same  on  behalf  of  this  commonwealth. 

Provided,  That  any  of  the  said  inhabitants  may  likewise  carry 
on  such  trade,  on  their  own  accounts,  notwithstanding. 

This  act  shall  continue  andjbe  in  force,  from  and  after  the  passing 
of  the  same,  for  and  during  the  term  of  twelve  months,  and  from 
thence  to  the  end  of  the  next  session  of  assembly,  and  no  longer. 


TRANSCRIPTS  FROM  THE  CAHOKIA  RECORD. 

Jeudy  lo*  Juin  1779. 

president  pierre  Godin  B*^  Saucier 

francois  trotier    *  antoine  Girardin 

Charle  Gratiaut.  michel  Beaulieu 

present. 

Catherine  negresse  a  B*®  Saucier,  appres  avoir  Ete  appel^  Et 
examine  a  dit  que  I'anne  Derniere  son  mari  ayant  demande  a  Son 
maitre,  pour  Sailer  promener  aux  Kas.  que  lorsque  manuel  et 
maurau  negre  appartenant  a  Messieurs  LeCompte  Et  baulieu  ont 
Sut  quils  y  alloit  il  luy  ont  apporte  une  Chopine  de  tafia,  disant  que 
Setoit  pour  Son  Voyage,  Et  quil  nut  pas  plutot  but  de  cette  Eau 
de  vie  quil  Se  Senti  malade  Et  quil  Est  encore  Jusqua  present  Et 
que  le  Jour  que  les  dits  negre  ont  Ete  pris  ayant  Ete  acquse 
D 'avoir  Empoisonner  plusieurs  personne  que  ses  meme  negres  luy 
ont  avoue  quils  ont  Empoisonner  Son  mary;  Elle  deClare  que  le 
nome  Morau  luy  a  dit  que  manuel  vouloit  Lorsqu'il  Luy  a  donne 
de  la  medecine  il  vouloit  le  faire  mourir  subitement,  mais  quil  luy 
avoit  repondu  quil  valoit  mieu  le  faire  mourir  En  lengoeur  Et  que 
depuis  ce  tembs  il  est  Languissant  La  d^^  negresse  Declare  Encore 
que  maurau  luy  avoit  dit  que  manuel  Voulait  apsolument  Em- 
poisonner M^  Martin  Et  Sa  femme  Et  que  La  negresse  dud'^  Sieur 
Etoit  de  ce  Complot  Et  qu'un  autre  negre  nome  Guanga  apparte- 
nant aud*  sieur  Martin  ayant  Eu  nouvelle  de  cela  Leur  avoit  dit 

1  These  transcripts  were  made  by  the  Cahokia  clerk  for  the  court  at  Kaskaskia,  which 
exercised  superior  jurisdiction  in  this  case.  They  are  from  the  Kaskaskia  Records.  Tran- 
scription by  the  editor. 

The  evidence  of  these  records  is  very  interesting,  for  they  explain  the  two  warrants  for 
execution  of  these  two  negroes  to  be  found  in  John  Todd's  Record-Book  in  Chicago  Hist.  Soc.'s 
Publications,  iv.,  302  and  303.  According  to  the  Record-Book,  Manuel  was  condemned  to  be 
burned  to  death,  a  punishment  against  negroes  which  was  permitted  the  county  courts  of  Vir- 
ginia.— Chitwood,  Justice  in  Colonial  Virginia,  in  /.  H.  U.  Studies,  Series  xxiii.,  No.  7,  p. 
loi.  Although  Todd  issued  the  warrant,  he  repented  the  next  day,  crossed  the  copy  of  the 
warrant  out  and  issued  a  new  one,  in  which  the  penalty  was  hanging. — Kas.  Rex.  Mason  in 
his  Chapters  from  Illinois  History,  264,  suggested  without  sufficient  authority  that  the  crime 
for  which  the  negroes  were  punished  was  voudouism,  and  he  is  followed  by  Roosevelt  in  his 
Winning  of  the  West,  ii.,  175,  where  he  compares  the  prosecution  of  the  negroes  in  Catholic 


TRANSCRIPTS  FROM  THE  CAHOKIA  RECORD.^ 

Thursday,  June  lo,  1779. 

President,  Pierre  Godin.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Francois  Trottier.  Antoine  Girardin. 

Charles  Gratiot.  ^  Michel  Beaulieu. 

Present. 

Catherine,  a  negress  belonging  to  Bte.  Saucier,  after  having 
been  summoned  and  examined,  said  that  last  year  her  husband 
had  asked  of  his  master  permission  to  walk  to  Kaskaskia  and  when 
Manuel  and  Moreau,  negroes  belonging  to  MM.  LeComte  and 
Beaulieu,  knew  that  he  was  going,  they  brought  him  a  pint  of 
tafia^  saying  that  it  was  for  his  journey;  and  that  he  had  no  sooner 
drunk  of  that  liquor  than  he  felt  sick  and  that  he  is  still  sick  up  to 
the  present;  and  that  the  day  on  which  the  said  negroes  were 
arrested  on  the  accusation  of  having  poisoned  several  persons, 
these  same  negroes  confessed  to  her  that  they  had  poisoned  her 
husband;  she  declares  that  the  named^  Moreau  told  her  that 
Manuel,  when  he  gave  him  the  medicine,  wished  to  make  her  hus- 
band die  suddenly,  but  that  he  had  answered  that  it  was  better  to 
make  him  die  slowly;  and  she  said  that  since  that  time  her  hus- 
band has  been  pining.  The  said  negress  declares  also  that  Moreau 
had  said  to  her  that  Manuel  positively  wished  to  poison  M. 
Martin  and  his  wife  and  that  the  negress  of  the  said  gentleman 
was  in  this  plot ;  and  that  another  negro  named  Guanga  belong- 
ing to  the  said  M.  Martin,  having  had  news  of  this,  had  said  to 
them  that  if  they  didn't  take  away  the  poison,  which  they  had 

Illinois  with  that  of  the  white  witches  of  Puritan  New  England.    The  denial  of  sufficient  proof 
for  this  explanation  of  the  warrants  was  made  in  Shea's  Life  of  Archbishop  Carroll,  190. 

'  Tafia  was  a  cheap  rum,  which  formed  the  staple  liquor  of  the  West.  The  word  eau-de-vie 
is  used  throughout  the  record  as  the  equivalent  of  liquor,  without  reference  to  any  particular 
kind. 

3  NommS  is  used  to  designate  some  person  named  in  the  proceedings,  but  not  previously 
mentioned  in  the  record. 

13 


14  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTION 

que  Si  il  ne  retirer  pas  le  poison  quil  avoit  Jett^  ch6  Son  maitre, 
quil  les  declareroit  Se  qui  fit  quil  detdrairent  un  poison  quils  avoit 
Enter^  sous  Le  Soeul  de  la  porte. 

paul  negre  appartenant  a  M*^®  Lapencee  ayant  Ete  appelld  Et 
examiner  a  dit  quil  avoit  Entendu  dire  par  tout  les  negres  qui  ont 
deja  donne  Leur  Deposition  que  les  nome  manuel  et  maurau 
avoit  Empoisonner  toute  Les  personne  mentione  Dans  La  Declara- 
tion qui  a  Deja  Ete  faite  par  Eux. 

Le  nom^  Sasa  negre  appartenant  a  mad^^®  Buet  ayant  Ete 
appele  Et  examiner  a  dit  que  ayant  Ete  dans  la  Cabane  du 
Sieur  Martin  demender  une  pipe  de  tabac  a  Sa  negresse  nome 
Janette  Et  quelle  luy  avoit  dit  daller  au  chevet  de  son  lit 
quil  En  trouveroit,  Et  qu'ayant  regarder,  il  auroit  trouver  une 
Corne  Dans  laquelle  il  y  avoit  du  Sang  qui  Bouillet,  Et 
qu'  ayant  Ete  Surpris  il  fut  demender  a  la  negresse  ce  que 
Setoit,  que  la  negresse  luy  dit  de  ne  point  toucher  a  cela,  et  que 
cetoit  manuel  qui  luy  avoit  Donne  pour  faire  moarir  Son  maitre 
Et  Sa  maitresse,  et  que  maurau  ayant  Sut  cela  lui  fut  dire; 
Comment  tu  garde  une  chose  comme  cela  che  toi  Est  ce  que  tu  ne 
Salt  pas  que  cette  avec  Cette  Corne  que  manuel  Sest  Servie  pour 
faire  Empoisonner  monsieur  et  madame  nicol.  il  declare  de  plus 
qu'un  negre  nome  Samba  appartenant  a  M^  quenel  prit  Cette 
Corne  Et  la  fut  montrer  a  maurau  que  MauRau  Luy  dit  que 
Cetoit  la  meme  Corne  que  manuel  luy  avoit  donne  pour  faire 
mourir  mons'"  Et  madame  Nicol. 

signe  pierre  Godin.  president. 

Pour  Copie  Conforme  a  Loriginal  reste  Sur  Le  Registre  de  la 
Court  aux  Kaos  le  lo^®  Juin  1779. 

fr  saucier  Greff®'^ 

Premiere  interogation  faite  au  negre  de  M^  Jaquet  nome 
francois,  apres  avoir  Ette  apele  Et  Examine  a  dit  que  Le  negre 
nome  maurau  luy  avoit  dit  a  luy  parlant  quil  avoit  fait  mal  au 
negre  de  M^  Laurant,  de  S*  Louis  par  raport  a  la  negrese  de 
mon^  martin  nome  Janette  Comme  ayant  quelque  Commerce 
tous  deux  avec  elle  que  cetoit  le  Sujet  pourquoy  il  luy  avoit 
donne  Du  poison ;  Declare  encore  ledit  negre  que  des  lorsque  le 


CAHOKIA  TRANSCRIPTS,  1779  15 

thrown  into  his  master 's  house,  he  would  denounce  them,  which 
caused  them  to  dig  up  a  poison  which  they  had  buried  under  the 
threshold  of  the  door. 

Paul,  a  negro  belonging  to  Madame  Lapance,  after  being  sum- 
moned and  examined,  said  that  he  had  heard  all  the  negroes, 
who  have  already  given  their  testimony,  say  that  the  named 
Manuel  and  Moreau  had  poisoned  all  the  persons  mentioned  in 
the  declaration  which  has  already  been  made  by  them. 

The  named  Sasa,  a  negro  belonging  to  Mademoiselle  Buyat, 
after  being  summoned  and  examined,  said  that  he  was  in  the 
cottage  of  M.  Martin  to  ask  for  a  pipefuU  of  tobacco  from  his 
negress,  named  Janette,  and  that  she  had  told  him  to  go  to  the 
head  of  her  bed  and  he  would  find  some,  and  that  when  he  looked 
he  had  found  a  horn  in  which  there  was  boiling  blood;  and  as  he 
was  surprised,  he  had  asked  the  negress  what  it  was;  that  the 
negress  told  him  not  to  touch  that,  and  that  it  was  Manuel 
who  had  given  it  to  her  to  put  her  master  and  mistress  to  death; 
and  that  Moreau,  when  he  knew  that,  had  said  to  her:  "What! 
Can  you  keep  a  thing  like  that  in  your  house  ?  Do  you  not  know 
that  it  was  this  horn  that  Manuel  used  to  poison  Monsieur  and 
Madame  NicoUe?"  He  declares  furthermore  that  a  negro, 
named  Samba  belonging  to  M.  Quenel,  took  this  horn  and  had 
shown  it  to  Moreau  and  that  he  said  that  it  was  the  same 
horn  that  Manuel  had  given  him  to  put  to  death  Monsieur  and 
Madame  NicoUe. 

Signed,  Pierre  Godin,  President. 

Copy  conforms  to  the  original  spread  on  the  record-book  of 
the  Court  at  Cahokia,  June  10,  1779. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk. 

First  cross-examination  of  the  negro  called  Francois  belong- 
ing to  M.  Jaquet.  After  having  been  summoned  and  examined, 
he  said  that  the  negro,  named  Moreau,  had  told  him  in  conver- 
sation that  he  had  made  the  negro  of  M.  Laurant  of  St.  Louis, 
sick  on  account  of  the  negress  of  M.  Martin,  named  Janette, 
since  both  had  some  intercourse  with  her,  and  that  this  was  the 
reason  he  had  given  him  poison.     The  said  negro  declares,  also, 


i6  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTION 

negre  de  M'^  Laurant  a  Santi  malade  Et  quil  sut  bien  Etre  Em- 
poissond,  il  vint  trouve  ledit  maurau  et  luy  dit,  mon  pays,  ote 
moi  done  le  mal  que  tu  ma  fait,  a  quoy  ledit  maurau  a  repondu 
quil  n'etoit  plus  terns,  Ce  nest  pas  a  mon  pouvoir  de  te  Poter, 
Celuy  de  Mon^  laurant  luy  repeta  encore  que  si  il  vouloit  le  guerir 
quil  le  payeroit  Bien  a  quoy  ledit  maurace  repondit  quil  ne  le 
pouvoit  pas.  et  que  neanmoins  celuy  de  m^  Laurent  en  partant 
luy  lessa  un  quatine  Et  un  mouchoire  et  luy  promettant  que  Si 
il  ne  mouroit  pas  quil  le  Satisferay  plus  Emplement. 

a  une  autre  interogation  Le  dit  negre  du  Sieur  Jaquet  declare 
quapres  que  le  negre  du  Sieur  Laurant  Eut  Ete  traverse  quil 
mourut  peu  de  tems  appres  Et  quil  fut  reprocher  au  deux  negre 
Soupsone  Empoisoner  En  leurs  disant;  Comment  Voila  Encore 
un  negre  mort  que  Ion  dit  que  vous  avies  Empoisonne  a  quoy 
ledit  maurau  luy  repondit  que  Si  il  lavoit  fait  il  netoit  pas  Seul 
que  Cetoit  manuel  qui  Etoit  le  chef  de  la  medecine  et  quil  luy 
en  fournissoit  Lorsqui'il  en  avoit  Besoin. 

Declare  encore  ledit  negre  que  maurau  ayant  demandd 
quelque  faveur  a  la  negresse  de  Mons^  Nicol  quil  luy  promit  que 
Si  elle  le  luy  accordoit  quil  luy  Donneroit  de  la  Medecine  pour 
adoucir  sa  maitraisse  Comme  Setant  plain  a  luy  quelle  Etoit  trop 
Mechante  Et  en  donnat  pareillement  au  mari  de  laditte  negresse 
pour  Son  maitre  Et  qu'  apres  la  mort  de  feu  m'^  nicol  et  sa  dame 
ledit  maurau  demanda  ce  qu'on  luy  avoit  promis,  La  negresse 
particulierrement  ne  voulut  point  luy  accorder  ce  quelle  avoit 
promis  ce  qui  fit  led*  maurau  L'empoisonna  et  quelle  en  mourut. 

A  dit  encore  led*  negre  que  lorsque  laditte  negresse  de  feu 
sieur  nicol  Est  tombe  malade  que  plusieurs  negres  du  pays  de 
laditte  negresse  furent  trouver  maurau  pour  le  Soliciter  a  guerir 
laditte  negresse  a  quoy  ledit  maurau  repondit  quil  n'etoit  plus 
a  Son  pouvoir  de  luy  oter  ce  quil  luy  avoit  donner. 

Cupidon  negre  a  B*^  Saucier  ayant  Ette  appelle  et  interroger, 
a  declarer  que  le  nome  maurau  Lorsque  M^  et  M*^^  Nicol  furent 
mort  quil  dit  a  leur  negresse;  tu  doit  etre  presentement  contante 
voila  ton  maitre  Et  la  maitraisse  morte  tu  peu  te  promene  et  aller 

1  A  basin  for  melting  metals. 


CAHOKIA  TRANSCRIPTS,  1779  17 

that  as  soon  as  the  negro  of  M.  Laurant  felt  sick  and  he  surely 
knew  that  he  was  poisoned,  he  came  to  find  the  said  Moreau 
and  said  to  him:  "My  countryman,  take  away  the  sickness 
which  you  have  given  me,"  to  which  the  said  Moreau  answered 
that,  it  was  too  late  "It  is  not  in  my  power  to  take  it  from 
you";  and  that  the  negro  of  M.  Laurant  said  again  that  if 
he  would  cure  him  he  would  pay  him  well,  to  which  the  said 
Moreau  answered  that  he  could  not  do  it;  but,  nevertheless, 
the  negro  of  M.  Laurant  in  going  away  left  him  a  basin^  and  a 
handkerchief  and  promised  him  that  if  he  did  not  die  he  would 
satisfy  him  more  fully. 

At  another  cross-examination,  the  said  negro  of  M.  Jaquet 
declares  that,  shortly  after  the  negro  of  M.  Laurant  had  been 
sent  across  the  river,  he  died;  and  that  he  had  reproached  the  two 
negroes  suspected  of  poisoning  and  said  to  them:  "What! 
There  is  another  negro  dead,  whom  they  say  you  have  poisoned" ; 
to  which  Moreau  replied  that  if  he  had  done  it,  he  was  not 
alone,  for  it  was  Manuel  who  was  the  medicine-chief  and 
had  furnished  him  poison  whenever  he  had  need  of  it. 

The  said  negro  declares  also,  that  Moreau  had  asked  some 
favor  of  M.  NicoUe's  negress  and  promised  her  that  if  she  granted 
it  to  him,  he  would  give  her  medicine  to  make  her  mistress  gentle, 
as  she  complained  to  him  that  the  latter  was  very  bad,  and  he  gave 
some  likewise  to  the  husband  of  the  said  negress  for  his  master; 
and  that  after  the  death  of  the  late  M.  NicoUe  and  his  wife,  Mor- 
eau demanded  what  had  been  promised  to  him,  and  the  negress 
did  not  particularly  wish  to  grant  him  what  she  had  promised;  and 
for  this  reason  the  said  Moreau  poisoned  her  and  she  died  there- 
from. 

The  said  negro  said  also  that  when  the  said  negress  of  the 
late  M.  NicoUe  fell  sick,  several  negroes  of  the  country  of  the 
said  negress  went  to  find  Moreau  to  beseech  him  to  cure  the 
said  negress;  to  which  the  said  Moreau  answered  that  it  was  no 
longer  in  his  power  to  take  from  her  that  which  he  had  given  her. 

Cupidon,  a  negro  belonging  to  Bte.  Saucier,  after  being  sum- 
moned and  cross-examined,  declared  that,  when  M.  and  Madame 


i8  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTION 

ou  tu  voudra,  a  quoy  le  man  de  lad*^  negresse  dud*  sieur  nicol 
luy  repondit  nous  ne  tavions  pas  Demander  de  Les  faire  mourir 
nous  ne  voulion  seulement  que  tu  Les  adoucissent  un  peu,  maurau 
Demanda  a  la  negresse  de  luy  accorder  ce  quelle  luy  avoit  promis, 
la  negresse  luy  repondit  quil  Etoit  trop  Vieux,  et  quelle  ne  Le 
Vouloit  pas.  ha  [sic]  dit  led*  maurau  tu  me  trouve  trop  vieux  et 
bien  tu  t'en  repentira  Et  que  peu  de  terns  apres  il  I'empoi- 
sonna  la  negresse  Suivant  la  declaration  dud*  negre. 

Cette  faitte  par  Les  Susdits  negres,  a  Ette  faitte  en  presence 
de  Messieurs  trotier,  tourangeau,  Beaulieu  martin  Et  B*®  saucier 
qui  on  dit  que  Les  Depositions  faitte  par  Les  dit  negre  ci  dessus 
nomes,  quils  Etoit  de  leur  opinion  quapres  avoir  Entendu  dire 
par  divers  negres  que  les  dits  manuel  et  maurau  avoit  fait  ce 
dont  its  Etoient  accuse:  quil  Doivent  Etre  vrayament  Coupable 
aux  Cahos  lo  Juin  1779,  a  huit  heure  du  Soir  En  la  Maison  de 
B*®  Saucier. 

fr.  saucier  Greff^^  Signe  pierre  Godin. 

Copie  Conforme  a  Porginal  rest^  Sur  Le  registre  de  la  Court. 

f.  Gref. 
The  Arraignment  by  the  States  Attorney. 

Je  Soussigne  Procureur  P^  L'Etat  de  la  Virginie  au  district 
des  Illinois  a  L'honneur  de  Representer  a  La  Cour  Respectable 
des  Kas  que  par  les  deposition  des  diferens  Negres  des  Kahos  il 
Parroit  que  Les  Negres  Moreau  &  Manuel  Sont  Effectivem* 
Coupable  du  Crime  Horrible  a  leurs  Charge,  et  que  par  toutes 
les  declarations  &  temoinages  il  Parroit  que  le  negre  Moreau  est 
plus  Coupable  que  L'autre  ayant  Administre  les  Poisons  que 
L'autre  luy  auroit  donne. 

Par  les  Quels  Poisons  plusieurs  des  bons  sujets  de  cette  Repub- 
lique  &  des  soldats  de  la  garnison  Sont  Mort. 

C'est  pourquoy  au  Nom  de  L'Etat  Je  pense  Messieurs 
que  sy  vous  Trouve  les  dits  Negres  Coupable  vos  prononceres 
leurs  Sentence  de  Mort  et  en  Nommeres  le  Jour  et  la  maniere 
d'Exetion  qui  ne  pent  etre  trop   Cruelle  pour  des  Criminels, 

^  This  document  does  not  belong  to  the  records  of  Cahokia,  but  since  it  is  one  of  the  acts 
in  the  prosecution  of  the  negroes,  it  seemed  best  to  include  it.     It  belongs  to  the  Kas.  Rec. 


CAHOKIA  TRANSCRIPTS,  1779  19 

Nicolle  were  dead,  the  named  Moreau  said  to  their  negress: 
"You  ought  to  be  content  now.  There  are  your  master  and 
mistress  dead  and  you  c3,n  take  a  walk  and  go  where  you  wish; " 
to  which  the  husband  of  the  said  negress  of  the  said  M.  Nicolle, 
answered:  "We  did  not  ask  you  to  make  them  die.  We  wished 
only  that  you  make  them  a  little  gentler;"  and  that  Moreau 
asked  the  negress  to  grant  him  what  she  had  promised  and  the 
negress  replied  to  him  that  he  was  too  old  and  that  she  did  not 
wish  to;  that  the  said  Moreau  said:  "You  find  me  too  old,  and 
well  shall  you  repent  of  it";  and  that  shortly  after  he  poisoned 
the  negress  according  to  the  declaration  of  the  said  negro. 

These  depositions  made  by  the  negroes  aforesaid  were  made 
in  the  presence  of  MM.  Trottier,  Touranjeau,  Beaulieu,  Martin, 
and  Bte.  Saucier,  who  have  said  that  the  depositions  were  made  by 
the  said  negroes  aforenamed,  and  that  it  was  their  opinion,  after 
having  heard  it  said  by  divers  negroes,  that  this  said  Manuel 
and  Moreau  had  done  that  of  which  they  were  accused,  and  that 
they  should  be  found  truly  guilty.  At  Cahokia  June  10,  1779, 
at  eight  p.  m.,  in  the  house  of  Bte.  Saucier. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  Signed,  Piere  Godin. 

Copy  conforms  to  the  original  spread  on  the  record-book  of 
the  Court. 

F.  Clk. 
The  Arraignment  by  the  States  Attorney.^ 

I,  State's  Attorney  of  Virginia,  for  the  District  of  Kaskaskia, 
hereunder  signed,  have  the  honor  to  set  forth  to  the  honorable 
Court  of  Kaskaskia  that  from  the  testimony  of  different  negroes 
of  Cahokia  it  appears  that  the  negroes,  Moreau  and  Manuel, 
are  really  guilty  of  the  horrible  crime  of  which  they  are  accused; 
and  that  from  all  the  declarations  and  testimonies  it  appears  that 
the  negro  Moreau  is  more  guilty  than  the  other,  since  he  has 
administered  the  poison  which  the  other  had  given  him. 

From  which  poisons  several  of  the  good  subjects  of  this  Republic 
and  soldiers  of  the  garrison  have  died. 

This  is  the  reason  why  in  the  name  of  the  State  I  think, 
gentlemen,  that  if  you  find  the  said  negoes  guilty,  you  should 


20 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


qui   ont   Comis   des   Choses   sy   Extraordinairem*   Horrible  & 
affreu. 

aux  Kaskaskia  a  12®  Juin  1779. 

J  Girault. 

'  For  a  discussion  of  the  sentence  which  was  found,  see  supra,  p.  12,  n.  i.  The  warrant 
substituted  by  Todd  for  the  one  copied  and  erased  in  his  record-book  reads  as  follows:  "Illi- 
nois to  wit.  To  Richard  Winston;  Sheriff  of  Kaskaskia:  You  are  hereby  authorized  & 
required  between  the  Hours  of  Nine  &  Eleven  in  the  morning  of  the  Sixteenth  of  this  Instant 
to  cause  to  be  executed  Manuel  a  Slave  in  your  Custody  by  being  hung  by  the  neck  until 
he  be  dead  &  this  shall  be  your  Warrant.  Given  under  my  hand  &  Seal  the  14th  day  of 
June  1779.     Jno  Todd  jr." — Kas.  Rec,  Warrants. 

2  Jean  Girault  was  born  on  February  24,  1755,  in  London,  of  Huguenot  parents.  With 
his  brother  he  sailed  from  Liverpool  for  America,  and  on  the  voyage  both  were  sick  from 
small-pox,  from  which  the  brother  died.  In  New  York  Jean  was  employed  as  clerk  and 
book-keeper  by  an  importing  house.  It  is  said  by  a  descendant  that  he  here  mastered  the 
Latin,  Greek,  Hebrew,  English,  Spanish  and  Choctaw  languages. — Dr.  MSS.,  27J6S.  The 
account  is  doubtless  exaggerated,  for  he  probably  learned  the  classical  languages  in  his  youth 
and  he  was  perfecting  himself  in  Spanish  in  1786.  The  descendant  is  also  responsible  for 
the  statement  that  Girault  went  to  Virginia  and  later  raised  a  company  to  join  Clark  in  his 
expedition  to  the  Illinois.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  he  was  in  that  country  the  year  before  Clark's 
expedition;    for  on  March  17,  1777,  he  purchased  a  piece  of  land  in  Cahokia  from  Father 


CAHOKIA  TRANSCRIPTS,  1779 


21 


pronounce  their  sentence  of  death,  and  name  the  day  thereof  and 
the  manner  of  execution  which  cannot  be  too  cruel  for  criminals 
who  have  committed  deeds  so  extraordinarily  horrible  and 
frightful.^ 

At  Kaskaskia,  June  12,  1779. 

T.  Girault.2 

Gibault  and  in  July  of  the  same  year  he  was  appointed  notary  by  Rocheblave. — Kas.  Rec, 
Court  Record,  fols.  107  and  120.  When  Clark  reached  Kaskaskia,  he  found  Girault  very 
useful.  On  July  6,  1778,  Girault  was  appointed  interpreter,  and  wrote  Clark's  communica- 
tions to  tke  French.  On  the  i6th  of  the  same  month  he  received  a  commission  as  lieutena,nt 
in  Worthington's  company  of  light  horse,  an  appointment  confirmed  by  the  governor  of  Vir- 
ginia on  December  12th.  Todd  appointed  him  state's  attorney  June  5,  i779-  He  was  com- 
missioned captain  by  Governor  Jefferson  June  3,  1781,  and  on  the  gth  of  the  same  month 
Girault  appointed  Labuxiere  state's  attorney  in  his  stead.  He  was  made  commissary  by 
Clark  in  1781.  He  remained  in  the  army  till  1783,  when  he  received  his  honorable  dis- 
charge.— Dr.  Mss.,  27  J30.  He  then  moved  from  Ilhnois  to  New  Orleans,  and  sometime  after 
1786  settled  at  Natchez. — Girault  to  Wm.  Clark,  May  8,  1786;  letter  in  possession  of  H.  Rob- 
erts, Chester,  111.  At  Natchez  he  held  many  important  oflSces,  both  under  the  Spanish  and  U.  S. 
governments.    He  died  in  1813. 


REGISTRE    DE    LA   COUR    DU    DISTRICT  DES 
CAHOKIAS.^ 

a  une  Court  . .  [MS.  torn]  . . 
President  f  . .  [MS.  torn]  . .         char,  Gr  . .  [MS.  torn]  . . 
Michel  .  .[MS.  torn]  . .  B^e  Sauci  .  .[MS.  torn]  . . 

ant.  Girardin. 
AUGUSTIN  RACET  Demendeur  Senfacon  Defendeur. 

une  requette  presente  par  augustin  racet  Demendeur  qui 
Demande  que  le  Sieur  Sanfajon  luy  prouve  quil  Est  un  Coquin 
Et  Sa  femme  une  Voleuse  Comme  il  a  Ete  tr^te  Et  accuse  par  Eux. 

antoine  armant  a  produit  Sa  Defence  Centre  augustin  racet 
racet  [sic]  par  laquel  il  accuse  Ledit  racet  Detre  venu  ches  Luy 
Lataquer. 

pierre  gatient  ayant  prete  Serment  De  repondre  a  toute  Les 
question  que  La  Court  Luy  feroit  Et  a  dit  quarivant  Du  champ, 
quil  a  entendu  dire  par  m^^  racet  a  M^^  Senfafon  quelle  Etoit 
une  Voleuse  a  quoy  m^^  Sanfafon  a  respondu  quelle  n'avoit 
jamais  Ete  vole  de  lar  Ches  Lacroix,  Et  Declare  D'avoir  Entendu 
Dire  par  Le  Sieur  Senfacon  quen  tout  cas  Si  Lad^^  Dame  racette 
Etoit  une  voleuse  quelle  ne  tiendray  que  de  famille. 

George  hait  ay  .  .[MS.  torn]  . .  a  toute  Les  qu  .  .[AIS. 
torn] . .  feroit  Et  a  prou  . .  [MS.  torn]  Ecrit  . .  [MS.  torn] . . 

Gabriel  Baron  .  .[MS.  torn]. .  De  repondre  a  toute  .  .[MS. 
torn] .  .  Luy  feroit  Et  a  dit  qu  .  .[MS.  torn] . .  D'augustin  racette 
et  ayant  eu  quelqu  .  .[MS.  torn]. .  avec  Le  dit  Sieur  quil  Lavoit 
trett^  de  Coquin  a  quoy  Ledit  Baron  Luy  a  repondu  quil  netoit 
pas    Comme  Sa   belle   Soeur   qui    avoit    Vole    le   lar   Ch   [sic] 

^  Cah.  Rec.  in  Belleville,  111.,  original  manuscript.  Transcription  by  the  editor.  When 
it  first  came  into  my  hands,  it  was  unbound.  It  is  made  up  of  six  record  books,  sewed  together 
originally.  These  had  been  torn  apart  and  some  of  the  leaves  separated.  I  rearranged  them, 
and  they  have  been  rebound  by  the  county  officials.  A  few  pages  only  have  been  lost.  The 
size  of  the  pages  differs,  but  the  average  is  12^  by  8  inches.  The  number  of  pages  is  348,  of 
which  48  are  blank,  43  of  which  are  at  the  beginning,  when  the  clerk  used  only  one  side  of 
the  sheet.  Beginning  with  page  145  the  pages  are  numbered,  but  these  numbers  are  not  given 
in  the  transcription.     The  water-marks  are  various. 


RECORD  OF  THE  COURT  OF  THE  DISTRICT  OF 
CAHOKIA/ 

At  a  Court   .  .  [MS.  torn]  . . 
President,  Fr.  [Trottier]  Ch.  Gr[atiot.] 

Michel  [Beaulieu.]  Bte.  Saucier. 

Ant.  Girardin.  [Present.] 

AuGUSTiN  Racette,  Plaintiff,  vs  Sansfajon,  Defendant. 

A  petition  presented  by  Augustin  Racette,  plaintiff,  who  de- 
mands that  M.  Sansfa^on  prove  to  him  that  he  is  a  rascal  and  his 
wife  a  thief,  as  he  has  been  accused  and  called  by  them  [the 
defendant  and  his  wife.^ 

Antoine  Harmand^  produced  his  defence  against  Augustin 
Racette  and  accused  the  said  Racette  of  coming  to  his  house  to 
assault  him. 

Pierre  Gatient,  having  made  oath  to  answer  all  questions 
which  the  court  should  ask  him,  said  that  on  coming  from  the 
field  he  heard  Madame  Racette  call  Madame  Sansfafon  a  thief; 
to  which  Madame  Sansfafon  replied  that  she  had  never  stolen 
lard  from  the  Lacroix '  house.  And  he  further  said  that  he  heard 
M.  Sansfa^on  say  that  in  any  case  if  the  said  Madame  Racette 
was  a  thief,  she  only  took  after  the  family. 

George  Hait,  having  [made  oath  to  answer]  all  [questions 
the  court]  should  ask  [proved]  . .  [MS.  torn]  . .  written. 

Gabriel  Baron  [made  oath]  to  answer  all  [questions  the  coiut] 
should  ask  him  and  said  that  . .  [MS.  torn]  . .  of  Augustin  Ra- 
cette, and  having  had  some  [words]  with  the  said  gentleman  that 
he  had  been  caUed  a  rogue,  to  which  the  said  Baron  answered 
that  he  was  not  like  Racette's  sister-in-law  who  had  stolen 
lard  from  the  Lacroix's  house  and   chickens  from  Sansfafon's; 

2  jjig  full  name  was  Antoine  Harmand  called  Sansfaf on,  and  he  is  called  in  the  record 
either  Harmand  or  Sansfafon.  This  additional  name  was  very  common  among  the  French  in 
America,  and  sometimes  the  surname  and  sometimes  the  second  name  has  prevailed  in  the 
family.    The  correct  spelling  of  his  surname,  Harmand,  is  obtained  from  his  signature. 

23 


24  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

Lacroix  et  Les  poule  a  Senfajon  Et  le  dit  racette  luy  ayant 
demande  quil  luy  avoit  cela  quil  a  repondu  aud*  racette  que 
Cetoit  Le  S^  Dau  et  Sa  femme  qui  luy  avoit  dit  a  quoy  le  dit 
racette  a  repondu  que  D'au  Etoit  un  j.  P.  Et  sa  femme  une 
putin  Et  qui  Le  prouveroit. 

Gabriel  Constant  ayant  prete  Serment  De  repondre  a  toute 
les  questions  qui  luy  seran  [sic]  faite  Et  a  dit.  que  Cetant  trouv^ 
ches  Butau  quil  auroit  Entendu  demande  a  Gabriel  Baron  par 
racette  ou  il  avoit  Entendu  dire  quils  Etoit  Des  voleur  de  lar  et  de 
poule  a  quoy  ledit  Baron  a  repondu  quil  avoit  Entendu  dire  ches 
Senfafon. 

Antoine  Lusser  ayant  prete  Serment  De  repondre  a  toute  Les 
question  quon  luy  feroit  Comme  temoin  pour  le  defendeur  Et 
a  dit.  que  madame  Senfajon  ayant  Ete  ches  mad^  racette  pour 
y  chercher  une  poulle  quelle  reclamet  a  Elle,  et  que  m^^  racette  la 
trete  de  voleuse  et  quelle  ne  vivoit  que  Des  volaye  d'autruy  a 
quoy  m^^  Senfaf  on  luy  a  repondu  quelle  ne  luy  resembloit  pas 
quelle  n'avoit  Jamais  vole  De  lar  ches  Lacroix  Et  ce  Son  dit  Mil 
invective. 

La  Court  Est  ajourne  apres  dine  a  une  heure. 
f  saucier  Greffier.  f  trottier 

La  Court  a  renvoye  Le  present  proems  hor  De  la  Court  Comme 
une  Chose  honteuse  Et  indigne.  Et  a  Condanne  Le  Demendeur  a 
payer  Les  fraix  du  dit  proces  Et  quant  aux  fraix  particuUier  Les 
Deux  partis  sont  Condanner  a  les  payer  chaqu'un  En  particulier. 

Sau 
Charle  Gratiot  Demendeur  contre  B*«  hautier 
Dit  Lacharette. 

Charle  Gratiot  ayant  presente  un  b[illet]  a  la  Court  Contre  le 
Defendeur,  ayant  apris  quil  Etoit  parti  pour  le  Detroit  avec  les 
royaliste  Demande  quil  luy  Soit  accorde  de  faire  vendre  des  effest 
quil  a  En  garde  ches  gabriel  Constant  jusqu'a  La  Conqurence  de 
Sa  Somme. 

La  Court  a  accorde  a  la  demende  Du  S^  charle  Gratiot. 

Jan  B*^.  Lacroix  ayant  produit  un  Conte  Du  par  ledit  hautier 
dit  Lacharette  de  vingt  Livre  Et  a  pret^  Serment  desus. 


COURT  RECORD,  1779  25 

and  the  said  Racette  having  asked  where  he  heard  that,  he 
answered  that  M.  Dau  ^  and  his  wife  had  told  him.  Where- 
upon the  said  Racette  said  that  Dau  was  a  D.  F.^  and  his  wife 
a  strumpet  and  he  would  prove  it. 

Gabriel  Constant,  having  made  oath  to  answer  all  questions 
which  should  be  put  to  him,  said,  that  being  at  the  house  of  Butau 
he  had  heard  Racette  ask  Gabriel  Baron,  where  he  had  heard 
that  they  were  stealers  of  lard  and  chickens,  to  which  the  said  Baron 
answered  that  he  had  heard  it  said  at  Sansfafon's. 

Antoine  Lussier,  having  made  oath  to  answer  all  questions 
which  should  be  asked  him  as  witness  for  the  defendant,  said 
that,  while  Madame  Sansfafon  was  at  the  house  of  Madame 
Racette  in  search  of  a  chicken,  which  she  claimed  belonged  to  her, 
Madame  Racette  called  her  a  thief  and  said  she  lived  on  other 
people's  poultry.  To  this  Madame  Sansfagon  replied  that  she 
was  not  like  her,  that  she  had  never  stolen  lard  from  the 
Lacroix's  house;  and  they  said  to  each  other  a  thousand  invectives. 

The  court  adjourned  till  one  o'clock  after  dinner. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  F.  Trottier. 

The  Court  dismissed  the  present  suit  from  court  as  a  disgraceful 
and  shameful  thing,  and  has  condemned  the  plaintiff  to  pay  the 
costs  of  the  suit  and  each  of  the  two  parties  to  pay  his  special  costs. 

Saucier. 
Charles  Gratiot,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Bte.  Hautier  called 
Lacharette,  Defendant. 

Charles  Gratiot  brought  into  Court  a  note  against  the  defend- 
ant, having  learned  that  he  had  left  for  Detroit  with  the  royalists, 
and  prays  that  it  be  permitted  him  to  have  the  goods,  which 
the  defendant  has  stored  at  the  house  of  Gabriel  Constant,  sold 
up  to  the  equivalent  of  the  amount  of  his  note. 

The  Court  granted  the  suit  of  M.  Charles  Gratiot. 

Jean  Bte.  Lacroix  produced,  and  made  oath  to,  an  ac- 
count for  twenty  livres  owed  by  the  said  Hautier  called  La- 
charette. 

1  Possibly  this  means  Harmand. 

2  The  French  j.  f„  or  jean-fesse,  is  untranslatable  except  by  some  such  equivalent  vulgarity. 


26  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

La  Court  Luy  a  accorde  quil  Seroit  payer  Lors  de  la  vente  de  Ses 
effest 

une  requette  prdsente  a  la  Court  par  marie  Louise  ulim  veuve 
de  feu  J"  B*^  Degagne  Et  par  pichet,  Demandant  de  nomer  un 
tuteur  pour  les  mineurs  De  feu  lapierre  pour  La  Conservation  de 
leur  peu  de  bien. 

La  Court  a  ordonnd  une  assemble  Damie  pour  pour    [sic] 
proceder  a  lelextion  D'un  tuteur  Suivant  Les  Demande 
Sanfa^on  Demandeur  augustin  racette  Defendeur. 
Un  Compte  presente  a  la  Court  par  Le  Demandeur  Contre 
le  Defendeur  De  la  Somme  de  vingt  Sept  livres.     La  Court  a 
ordonn^  audit  racette  de  payer  Ledit  Compte  sans  dellay. 
f  saucier  Grefl&er  f  trottier 

La  Court  Est  ajourne  a  vendre  29  [sic]  9^^^  i779- 
a  une  Court  Vendredy  269  ^^®  1779. 
President  M^  fr  trotier.  m^  ant  Girardin 

m^  Ch  Gratiot  m'"  B^^  Saucier 

Present. 
M^  RENAL  Demandeur.  M^  Gratiot  Defendeur 
m^  renal  Demande  a  la  Court  que  M^  Gratiot,  Soit  Condanne 
a  luy  payer  une  Somme  de  trois  Cent  Livres  pour  une  operation 
quil  a  fait,  au  nome  racette  ayant  Ete  Envoye  cherche  par  Ledit 
Sieur  gratiot. 

Charle  Gratiot  repond  quil  Exposera  ses  Defence  a  la  Cour 
prochaine,  vendredy  3^®  xbre. 

Le  nome  Charloc  a  produit  sa  Declaration  Contre  M^  Hen- 
son  sur  Sa  mauvaise  Conduitte  avec  Les  sauvages,  Dans  la 
traitte. 

Ayant  Examine  La  Declarition  du  dit  charloc  Contre  Sieur 
Henson,  La  Court  a  decide  quil  seroit  sinifie  au  Sieur  Henson 
de  repondre  aujourd'huy  a  deux  heure  apres  midy  a  La  Declara- 
tion faite  Contre  luy. 

1  In  that  part  of  France  where  the  customary  law  prevailed,  the  iulelle  dative  was  almost 
universal.  It  was  the  law  of  the  coutume  ie  Paris,  and  therefore  of  Illinois.  According  to 
this  law,  the  guardians  of  minors  were  appointed  by  a  magistrate,  but,  as  in  the  above  case, 
very  often  only  after  election  by  the  relatives.  Under  French  law,  great  care  was  taken  of  the 
property  of  minors,  and  the  office  of  guardian  was  regarded  as  a  duty,  which  should  not  be 
lighty  refused,  although  the  service  was  gratuitous.  Two  guardians  were  appointed,  the 
second  being  the  surrogate,  whose  duties  were  to  guard  against  fraud  by  the  first.     The  sur- 


^  /^.:/^ ,1^.^  >i^^  /^^^  '^/''^r "^ 

Facsimile  of  a  Page  from  the  Record  of  the  Cahokia  Court, 
Fran(;ois  Saucier,  Clerk. 


^^  ;  . 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  i779  27 

The  Court  granted  that  it  should  be  paid  at  the  time  of  the 
sale  of  his  goods. 

A  petition  presented  to  the  Court  by  Marie  Louise  Ulim, 
widow  of  the  late  Jn.  Bte.  Desgagnd,  and  Pichet,  praying  that 
a  guardian  for  the  preservation  of  the  small  property  of  the 
minor  heirs  of  the  late  Lapierre  be  appointed. 

The  Court  ordered  an  assembly  of  friends  to  proceed  to  the 
election  of  a  guardian  according  to  the  petition.^ 

Sansfa^on,  Plaintiff  vs.  Augustin  Racette,  Defendant. 

An  accoupt  presented  to  the  court   by  the  plaintiff  against 
the  defendant  for  the  sum  of  twenty-seven  livres.    The  Court 
ordered  the  said  Racette  to  pay  the  account  without  delay. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  F.  Trottier. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Friday,  November  26,  1779. 
At  a  Court,  Friday,  November  26,  1779. 
President,  Fr.  Trottier.  Ant  Oirardin. 

Ch.  Gratiot.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Present. 
M.  Reynal,  Plaintiff  'z;^.  M.  Gratiot,  Defendant. 

M.  Reynal  prays  the  Court  that  M.  Gratiot  be  condemned  to 
pay  him  the  sum  of  three  hundred  livres  for  an  operation  which 
he  performed  on  the  named  Racette,  for  which  he  was  summoned 
by  the  said  M.  Gratiot. 

Charles  Gratiot  answered  that  he  would  present  his  defense  at 
the  next  Court,  Friday,  December  3. 

The  named  Charloc  produced  his  declaration  against  M. 
Henson  concerning  his  bad  conduct  in  his  trading  with  the 
savages. 

Having  examined  the  declaration  of  the  said  Charloc  against 
M.  Henson,  the  Court  decided  that  notice  should  be  given  M. 
Henson  to  answer  to-  day  at  two  o'clock  in  the  afternoon  the 
declaration  made  against  him. 

rogate  must  be  present  when  the  inventory  of  property  was  made,  and  he  represented  the  ward 
in  any  suit  brought  against  the  guardian.  Occasionally  the  guardians  called  in  the  relatives 
for  consultation,  as  for  instance,  when  the  sale  of  real  property  was  contemplated.  Since  the 
families  in  Illinois  were  naturally  small,  friends  were  also  invited  to  attend  such  family  coun- 
cils.— Viollet,  Histoire  du  droit  civil  Frangais,  ed.  1905,  pp.  576  ei  seq.;  Glasson,  Histoire 
du  droit  et  des  instituiions  de  la  France,  viii.,  526  et  seq. 


28  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

La  Court  Est  ajournd  a  2®  heureapres  midy  26®  pbre,  1779. 
f  saucier  grefi&er.  f  trottier. 

a  une  Court  du  26  q^'"®  a  2  heure  apres  midy. 
President  Moris'"  Franfois  trottier         M*"  ant.  Girardin 
M^  Charle  Gratiot  M'".  B^^  Saucier 

present. 
La  Court  a  decide  que  M'"  Henson  Continura  son  Commerce 
toute  fois  quil  retirera  Sa  Dame  De  La  quantine  puisque  Cest 
EUe  qui  tien  De  mauvais  DisCourt  au  sauvages  suivant  Les 
Declaration  Du  nome  charloc  et  Celle  du  peoria,  que  Cependant 
Le  Dit  Charloc  Sera  appele  pour  Declare  En  presence  dud* 
sieur  Henson  Et  tant  qua  tout  Les  accidant  qui  pourront  arriver 
par  La  Suitte,  et  qui  soit  prouve  que  ce  Soit  par  sa  faute,  il  En 
Sera   toujour  responsable  En  tout  Chose. 

La  Court  Est  ajourne  a  vendredy  3  x^'"^  i779- 

f  saucier  greffier  f  trottier 

a  une  Court  Du  10  xbre  1779. 
President  M"  francois  trottier  pierre  martin 

Michel  Beaulieu  B*^  Saucier 

antoine  Girardin  charle  Gratiot 

Present. 
M^  REYNAL  Demendeur  Charle  Gratiot  Defendeur. 
Le  Demandeur  Expose  a  la  cour,  par  une  requette  que  Le 
Defendeur  soit  Condanne  a  luy  payer  une  Somme  de  trois  Cent 
livres  de  paux  de  Chevreuil  pour  L' imputation  quil  a  fait  a  la 
Jamble  \sic\  De  J""  Racet,  Comme  ayant  Ete  Envoye  chercher 
par  Led*  Sieur  Et  que  led*  Sieur  Gratiot  avoit  promis  de 
payer  le  chirugien  moyenant  que  le  nome  parisien  a  qui  Lac- 
cident  Etoit  arrive  de  rembourser  ce  qui  luy  En  Couteray  Et 
que  Cela  avoit  Ete  Dit  En  presence  de  B*®  allary. 

B*^  allary  ayant  paru  par  ordre  Et  apres  avoir  prete  Serment 
a  prouve  quil  n'etoit  pas  aux  Cahos  Lorsque  Laccident  Est  arriv^ 
a  J"  racette. 

Le  Defendeur  ayant  produit  Sa  Deffence  par  Laquelle  il  ne  De- 


COURT  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1779  29 

The  Court  adjourned  till  two  o'clock  in  the  afternoon,  Novem- 
ber 26,  1779. 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  F.  Trottier. 

At  a  Court,  November  26,  at  two  o'clock  in  the  afternoon. 
President,  Francois  Trottier  Ant.  Girardin 

Charles  Gratiot  Bte.  Saucier. 

Present. 
The  Court  decided  that  M.  Henson  may  continue  his  business, 
provided  his  wife  shall  be  withdrawn  from  the  Cantine,^  since  it 
is    she  who  has  been  guilty  of  evil  speech    with    the  savages 
according  to  the  declarations  of  Charloc  and  the  Peorian;   that, 
however,    the    said    Charloc    shall  be  summoned  to  make  his 
declaration    in    the    presence    of    the    said    M.    Henson.     The 
Court  further  decided  that  for  all  accidents,  which  may  occur 
as  a  consequence  of  this  continuance  and  are  proved  to  be  due  to 
the  fault  of  the  said  M.  Henson,  he  shall  be  held  responsible. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  Friday,  December  3,  1779 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  F.  Trottier. 

At  a  Court,  December  10,  1779. 
President,  Francois  Trottier.       Pierre  Martin. 
Michel  Beaulieu.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Antoine  Girardin.  Charles  Gratiot. 

Present. 
M.  Reynal,  Plaintifif,  vs.  Charles  Gratiot,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  shows  the  Court  by  a  petition  that  the  defend- 
ant should  be  condemned  to  pay  him  a  sum  of  three  hundred 
pounds  of  deer-skins  for  the  amputation  of  the  leg  of  Jean 
Racette  which  he  performed,  as  he  had  been  summoned  by  the 
said  gentleman ;  and  the  said  M.  Gratiot  had  promised  to  pay 
the  surgeon  on  condition  that  the  named  Parisien  to  whom  the 
accident  had  happened,  reimburse  him  what  it  cost  therefor. 
This  was  said  in  the  presence  of  Bte.  Alarie. 

Bte.  Alarie  appeared  on  summons  and,  after  having  made  oath, 
proved  that  he  was  not  in  Cahokia  when  the  accident  happened  to 
Jean  Racette. 

1  This  may  mean  the  Cantine,  a  stream  near  Cahokia. 


30  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

vroit  pas  Etre  Condann^  a  payer  Cette  Somme  de  trois  Cent 
Livres,  vue  que  led^*  Racette  quoi  que  Laccident  soit  arrivd  ches 
Luy  Est  tout  a  fait  Etranger  Et  que  Dans  pareille  Cas  il  Devoit 
Depecher  quelqu'un  pour  avoyer  chercher  un  chirugien  pour 
Soulage  un  pauva  malheureux,  Sans  etre  oblige  D'en  payer 
Les  fraix. 

La  Court  ne  pouvant  pas  absolument  Condanner  Le  Sieur 
Charle  Gratiot  a  payer  au  Sieur  reynal  La  Somme  de  trois  Cent 
Livres  pour  1' imputation  faitte  a  la  Jambe  de  racette,  a  decide 
quil  Etoit  necessaire  D'attendre  Larive  du  nome  parisien  a  qui 
L'accident  est  arrive. 

une  Requette  presente  En  Cour  par  pierre  Roy  Contre  m^® 
Courville,  pour  quil  luy  Soit  Defendu  vendre  auqu'un  biens  fonds, 
qu'apres  avoir  fait  faire  invantaire,  Et  reconoitre  La  part  De 
Son  fils. 

La  Court  othaurise  Led*  Sieur  pierre  roy  a  faire  un  assemble 
de  parens  et  damis  pour  faire  invantaire  Des  biens  Delesse  par 
feux  Courville  Et  quil  Sera  fait  un  partage  Egal  Des  biens,  Entre 
ma^®  veuve  Courville  Et  son  fils,  Et  quil  sera  Elu  un    tuteur. 

La  Court  Est  ajourne  a  vendredy  17^^  xbre. 

f  saucier  Greffier  f  trottier 

a  une  Court  Du  17  xbre. 

ou  Etoit  present  Messieurs  Charle  Gratiot  Michel  Beaulieu 
B*®  Saucier  pierre  martin  Et  ant  Girardin,  tons  Cinq  Majestrat 
de  Lad**^  Court  —  assemble  pour  interoger  Le  peoria  sur  des 
mauvais  Discourt  quil  dit  avoir  Entendu  dire  par  d' autre  nation. 

Ledit  peoria  a  dit  quil  avoit  Entendu  Le  Chef  du  loup  faire 
des  reproche  aux  autre  Sauvages  a  legar  d'une  medail  Et  un 
Collier  rouge  quils  avoient,  il  a  dit  depuis  quayant  Ete  a  une 

1  One  of  the  several  attempts  made  by  the  British  to  arouse  the  Indians  to  drive  the  Vir- 
ginians out  of  Illinois.  In  Dillon,  Annals  of  Si.  Louis,  192,  is  an  interesting  letter  from 
Gratrot  to  Montgomery  giving  further  details  about  these  events.  This  winter's  work  ended 
in  the  fruitless  attack  of  the  British  and  Indians  on  St.  Louis  and  Cahokia  in  May.  See 
pp.  58,  n.  I,  589,  and  Inlrodtiction,  p.  Ixxxvii. 

2  Medals  of  silver  or  bronze  were  frequently  given  to  Indian  chiefs  as  tokens  of  alliance. 

3  Term  used  by  the  Indians  to  designate  the  Virginians. 
*  The  French  is  ''qu'en  cas  que." 


COURT  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1779  31 

The  defendant  offered  as  his  defence,  wherefore  he  should  not 
be  condemned  to  pay  this  sum  of  three  hundred  pounds,  that  the 
said  Racette,  although  the  accident  happened  at  his  house,  was 
a  total  stranger  to  him,  and  that  in  such  circumstances  it  was  his 
duty  to  send  somebody  to  seek  a  surgeon  to  relieve  an  unfortunate 
man  without  being  obliged  to  pay  the  costs. 

Since  the  Court  cannot  unconditionally,  condemn  M.  Charles 
Gratiot  to  pay  M.  Reynal  the  sum  of  three  hundred  pounds  for  the 
amputation  of  the  leg  of  Racette,  it  decided  that  it  was  necessary 
to  await  the  arrival  of  the  named  Parisien,  to  whom  the  accident 
happened. 

A  petition  presented  to  the  Court  by  Pierre  Roy  against  Madame 
Courville,  praying  that  she  be  forbidden  to  sell  any  land,  until 
she  has  caused  an  inventory  to  be  made  and  has  recognized  her 
son's  share. 

The  Court  authorizes  the  said  M.  Pierre  Roy  to  hold  an  assem- 
bly of  relatives  and  friends  to  make  an  inventory  of  the  property 
left  by  the  late  Courville  and  decrees  that  an  equal  division  of  the 
property  between  the  widow,  Madame  Courville,  and  her  son  be 
made,  and  that  there  be  elected  a  guardian. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Friday,  December  17. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  F.  Trottier. 

At  a  Court,  December  17: 

Where  were  present  MM.  Charles  Gratiot,  Michel  Beaulieu, 
Bte.  Saucier,  Pierre  Martin  and  Ant.  Girardin,  all  five  magis- 
trates of  the  said  Court  —  assembled  to  interrogate  the  Peorian 
about  the  evil  speech,  Which  he  said  he  had  heard  used  by  an- 
other nation.^ 

The  said  Peorian  said  that  he  had  heard  the  Chief  Wolf 
reproach  the  other  savages  in  regard  to  a  medal  ^  and  a  red 
belt  which  they  had.  He  said  that  later  he  was  at  the 
lodge  of  his  savages  with  Charloc  and  that  a  woman  asked  him 
what  he  had  come  for,  since  the  French  Big  Knife  ^  was  charged 
with  having  killed  one  of  their  people.  Thereupon  the  said 
savage  told  Charloc  to  go  home.  This  latter  answered  that 
in  case  *  he  was  in  danger  the  Master  of  Life  would  save  him. 


32  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

Loge  de  Ses  Sauvages  avec  Charloc  q'line  femme  luy  dit  quesce- 
qu'il  venoit  Chercher  puisque  Les  francois  Grand  Coutau  Etoit 
taxe  D'avoir  tue  un  De  leur  Gens.  Ladessu  Ledit  sauvages  Dit 
a  Charloc  de  sen  retourner,  se  dernier  luy  fit  reponce  quen  qua 
quil  y  aye  du  denger  que  le  maitre  de  la  vie  Le  Sauveroit,  Ledit 
sauvage  pe  a  dit  que  le  chef  loup  avoit  pris  Charloc  Et  I'avoit  mis 
Dans  le  Camp  des  hommes  que  la  un  autre  Chef  nome  la  puce 
ayant  pris  le  fusil  D'entre  les  mains  dud*  charloc  Luy  dit  pleure 
pour  Jay  le  Coeur  rouge  Et  enseglante,  led*  peoria  a  dit  q'une 
femme  luy  avoit  dit  pourquoy  Escequ'il  venoit  a  Leur  loge  puisquil 
ne  Se  passoit  rein  de  Bon  parmi  Eux,  que  tous  les  jour  il  se  tenoit 
Des  Conseil  et  quil  ne  disoit  rien  de  bon,  il  dit  de  plus  que  quand 
la  femme  a  Eu  fini  de  luy  parler,  un  Jeune  homme  Sest  mis  a  la 
porte  et  que  voyant  Cela  il  s'est  Sauve  et  qu'a  linstant  tout  les  autre 
Sauvages  se  mirent  a  Crie  En  voila  un  qui  se  Sauve,  En  plusieurs 
fois  differentes,  led*  peoria  a  dit  encore  quand  se  Sauvant  quil 
n'a  eu  que  le  tems  de  prendre  Son  fusil  et  a  lesse  Sa  Couverte. 

Le  dit  Charloc  a  dit  quil  a  dit  au  dit  peoria  si  il  Vouloit  Venir 
avec  luy  Voir  les  sauvages  Et  que  le  pe  Luy  repondit  quil  le  vou- 
loit bien  il  dit  de  plus  quan  allant  voir  ses  dits  sauvages  quils  ont 
rencontre  un  homme  et  une  femme,  que  I'homme  et  pres  de  boisson 
quil  la  fait  monter  a  cheval  avec  luy  et  que  la  femme  a  Con- 
tinuer  la  route  avec  le  pe  ledit  Charloc  dit  qu'etant  arrive  il  dit 
audit  pdoria  de  desseler  son  Cheval  et  D'entrer  avec  luy  dans  la 
Loge  Sur  quoy  le  pe  luy  repondit  quil  ne  vouloit  pas  entr^,  Seci 
fut  dit  En  presence  du  pe  qui  a  dit  pourquoy  Veut  tu  que  Jentre 
mois  qui  Entans  mal  parle  Dans  cette  loge,  ledit  Charloc  dit 
qu' entrant  Dans  La  loge  il  avoit  une  bouteille  a  sa  main  Voulu- 
rent  luy  prendre,  et  quil  leur  dit  prene  La  je  ne  m'en  Souci  pas,  le 
peoria  dit  quil  luy  ont  arrach^  de  force. 

La  Court  Et  ajourne  a  2  heure  apres  midi  17  du  present, 
f  saucier.  Ch  Gratiot. 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1780        33 

The  said  Peorian  savage  said  that  the  Chief  Woif  had  taken 
Charloc  and  placed  him  in  the  men's  camp  and  that  there 
another  chief  named  The  Flee  seized  the  gun  from  the  hands 
of  the  said  Charloc  and  said  to  him,  "Weep,  for  my  heart  is 
red  and  bloody".  The  said  Peorian  said  that  a  woman  had  asked 
him  why  he  came  to  their  lodge,  since  there  was  nothing  good 
going  on  among  them  and  that  every  day  there  were  held  councils 
and  that  nothing  good  was  said.  He  said  further  that,  when  the 
woman  had  finished  speaking  to  him,  a  young  man  started  for 
the  door  and,  upon  seeing  that,  he  had  made  his  escape ;  and  that 
immediately  all  the  other  savages  began  crying,  "There  is  one 
who  is  escaping".  On  several  different  occasions,  the  Peorian 
said  that  in  escaping  he  has  had  only  time  to  take  his  gun  and 
had  left  his  blanket. 

The  said  Charloc  said  that  he  asked  the  said  Peorian  if  he 
wanted  to  come  with  him  to  see  the  savages,  and  that  the 
Peorian  answered  that  he  was  very  willing.  He  further  said  that 
in  going  to  see  the  said  savages  they  met  a  man  and  a  woman 
and  that  the  man  was  intoxicated,  and  that  he  made  him  mount 
on  the  horse  with  him  and  the  woman  continued  the  route  with 
the  Peorian.  The  said  Charloc  said  that  on  arriving  he  told  the 
Peorian  to  unsaddle  his  horse  and  to  enter  the  lodge  with  him, 
whereupon  the  Peorian  answered  that  he  did  not  wish  to  enter. 
This  was  said  in  the  presence  of  the  Peorian  who  said,  "Why 
do  you  want  me  to  enter  who  understand  the  evil  talk  in 
this  lodge".  The  said  Charloc  said  that  when  he  entered  the 
lodge,  he  had  in  his  hand  a  bottle  which  the  savages  wished  to 
take  from  him,  and  that  he  said  to  them,  "  Take  it.  I  do  not  care 
for  it".    The  Peorian  said  that  they  snatched  it  by  force. 

The  Court  adjourned  until  two  o'clock  in  the  afternoon  the 
17th  of  the  present  month. 

F.  Saucier.  Ch.  Gratiot. 


34  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Court  17  x^^«  i779- 
m'  Gratiot  m^  Martin  ' 

m^  Beaulieu  m^  B*®  Saucier 

President 
suivant  Les  raport,  Et  Discourt  qui  ont  Et^  tenu  En  Cour.  de 
la  part  Des  Sauvages  mal  intention^,  La  Court  a  ordonn^  que 
messieurs  Les  Commandant  de  millice  Donnerons  Des  ordres  pour 
quil  soit  fait  une  Visitte  generalle  Dans  toute  Les  maison  pour 
voir  Si  tout  Le  monde  ont  Des  armes  en  Etat  et  la  munition  neces- 
saire  pour  Se  Defendre  Si  Ion  Si  trouve  oblige,  Et  quil  Sera  ordon- 
n^  a  Ceux  qui  n'en  n'auront  point  De  Sen  pourvoir  Sans  auqu'un 
pretexe  Vue  que  Suivant  toute  apparance  il  y  a  aux  environ  Du 
Village  Des  nations  qui  tiennent  de  mauvais  propos  et  qui  sont 
suivant  le  raport  de  quel  que  autre  Sauvages  tr^s  mal  inten- 
tionnes. 

La  Court  Est  ajourne  a  vendredy  24  x^^® 
f  saucier  greffier  Ch  Gratiot 

a  une  Cour  du  19  Janvier.  1780. 
President  M'^  francois  trottier.  M^  B*^  saucier 

M^  antoine  Girardin  M'^  Charle  Gratiot 

M^  pierre  martin  Present. 

Le  Colonel  mongonori  ayant  fait  asemble  La  Court  pour  Savoir 
pour  quoy  M^  henson  navoit  pas  Ete  reprimande  pour  Le  tor  quil 
parroit  avoir  fait  suivant  le  raport  quil  luy  en  a  Ete  fait  par  mons^. 
cap*  McCarty. 

Le  Colonel  mongomori  repente  [sic]  a  la  Cour  que  Comme  Les 
autre  village  ont  fourni  beaucoup  de  provisions  pour  Les  troupe 
au  Credit  des  Etat  quil  Espere  que  Ce  village  cy  suivant  La  Capa- 
city Des  habitant  Voudront  bien  fournir  quelque  provision  tel  que 
L'on  fait  les  habitant  des  autre  villages. 

La  Court  a  represent^  au  Colonel  quelle  avoit  Deja  Ete  in- 
formd  des  plainte  porte  contre  Sieur  henson,  et  quil  ny  avoit  auq'- 
une  Chose  qui  le  regardoit  Dans  Les  plainte  porte  Contre  luy  et 
quil  sestoit  justifid  pour  le  Contraire.     La  Court  a  Consenty  quil 

1  Colonel  Montgomery  was  at  this  time  in  command  of  the  forces  in  Illinois  and  was  sta- 
tioned at  Kaskaskia.     See  Introduction,  pp.  Ixxvi.,  Ixxx.  et  seq. 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1780         35 

At  a  Court,  December  17, 1779. 
M.  Gratiot.  M.  Martin. 

M.  Beaulieu.  M.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Present. 
On  account  of  the  report  and  testimony  which  have  been  given 
in  Court  about  the  evil-intentioned  savages,  the  Court  decreed  that 
the  officers  of  the  militia  shall  give  orders  that  there  be  made  a 
general  inspection  of  all  houses  to  see  if  everybody  has  arms  in 
condition  and  the  necessary  ammunition  for  defence,  if  occasion 
arises,  and  that  orders  be  given  to  those,  who  have  neither,  to 
provide     themselves    therewith    without    any  excuse,  because, 
to  all  appearances,  there  are  in  the  neighborhood  of  the  village 
nations  who  are  holding  hostile  talks  and  are  very  evilly  disposed, 
according  to  the  report  of  some  other  savages. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  Friday,  December  24. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  F.  Trottier. 

At  a  Court,  January  19,  1780. 

President,  Francois  Trottier       Bte.  Saucier. 

Antoine  Girardin.  Charles  Gratiot. 

Pierre  Martin.  Present. 

''*  \  Colonel  Montgomery  ^  caused  the  Court  to  assemble  in  order  to 
learn  why  Mr.  Henson  had  not  been  reprimanded  for  the  wrong 
which  he  appears  to  have  done  according  to  the  report  made  to 
him  by  Captain  McCarty. 

Colonel  Montgomery  shows  [?]  the  Court  that,  as  the 
other  villages  have  furnished  supplies  of  provisions  for  the 
troops  on  the  credit  of  the  States,  he  hopes  that  this  village 
according  to  the  capacity  of  the  inhabitants  will  be  willing 
to  furnish  some  provisions,  as  the  inhabitants  of  the  other  villages 
have. 

The  Court  showed  the  Colonel  that  it  had  already  been 
informed  of  the  complaint  brought  against  M.  Henson,  and  that 
there  was  nothing  in  the  complaint  which  concerned  him  and 
that,  on  the  contrary,  he  had  justified  himself.  The  Court  agreed 
that  a  census  shall  be  made  and  that  those  who  can  furnish  some 


36  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

sera  fait  une  recaputulation  Et  que  Ceux  qui  pourront  fournir 
suivant  Leurs  Capacite  quelque  provisions  soit  farine  ou  mays 
seront  force  De  Le  faire. 

fr  saucier  Greffier. 
a  une  Court  vendredy  4^  fevrier  1780. 
President  M^  trotier.  M^  Martin 

M"^  Gratiot  M^  B*^  saucier. 

M^  Girardin  Present. 

p.  B^^  Lacroix  Demendeur  B^^  saucier  Defendeur 

Le  Demendeur  poursuit  Le  Defendeur  pour  un  billet  de  Cent 
quatrevingt  une  livres  Dix  sols  En  pelleterie  quil  Luy  Doit  payer 
En  pelleterie  ou  farine. 

Le  Defendeur  represente  quil  a  propose  En  Differante  occasion 
Le  payement  dud^  billet  En  pelleterie  Et  que  le  Demendeur  La 
refuse. 

Disant  que  le  Defendeur  Luy  avoit  promis  Du  ble,  Le  Defendeur 
Luy  en  avoit  Efifectivement  promis  toute  fois  quil  ne  puisse  pas 
avoir  de  pelleterie  a  lecheance  Dud*  Billet. 

La  Court  a  ordonne  que  le  Defendeur  payeray  Son  Billet  a  la 
Demende  Du  Demendeur  suivant  Sa  teneur. 

aplication  fait  a  la  Cour  par  La  Dame  Veuve  Jermain  De- 
mandant quil  luy  soit  permis  de  Se  Demettre  De  la  Charge  de 
Subroge  tuteur  du  mineurs  Langdoc  Dont  feu  Son  marie. 

autre  aplication  fait  a  la  Court  par  la  Dame  Veuve  pierre  Godin 
disant  que  feu  Son  mari  ay  ant  Ete  Charge  de  la  charge  de  Subroge 
tuteur  de  L'anfant  mineur  de  feu  Sieur  Labe  EUe  Demande  quil 
luy  Soit  permis  de  se  Demettre  de  lad*  Charge  de  Subroge  tu- 
teur que  tenoit  feu  Son  mari. 

La  Court  a  ordonne  qu'a  la  demende  Des  Dames  Veuve  jer- 
main et  pierre  Godin  qui  [sic]  Leur  Serra  permis  de  faire  faire 
une  assemble  de  parant  ou  damis  pour  proceder  a  lelection  De 
deux  subroger  tuteur  qui  prendra  parfaite  Connecence  Des  in- 
terest Des  mineurs. 

La  Court  Et  ajourne  a  vendre  11  De  fevrier. 

f  saucier  Greffier. 

1  No  troops  were  quartered  on  the  Cahokians  this  winter,  but  the  people  of  Kaskaskia 
complained  to  Montgomery  that  the  other  villages  were  not  doing  their  fair  share  for  the  sup- 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1780        37 

provisions,  either  flour  or  com,  shall  be  forced  to  do  so  according 
to  their  capacity.^ 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk. 

At  a  Court,  Friday,  February  4,  1780. 
President,  M.  Trottier  M.  Martin 

M.  Gratiot.  M.  Bte.  Saucier 

M.  Girardin.  Present. 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Bte  Saucier,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  on  a  note  of  one  hundred  and 
eighty-one  livres  ten  sols  in  peltries,  which  should  be  paid  him  in 
peltries  or  flour. 

The  defendant  shows  that  he  has  proposed  on  several  occasions 
the  payment  of  the  said  note  in  peltries  and  that  the  plaintiff 
refused  it,  saying  that  the  defendant  had  promised  him  wheat. 

The  defendant  had  in  fact  promised  him  wheat,  yet  only 
in  case  that  he  should  not  be  able  to  obtain  peltries  at  the 
maturity  of  the  said  note. 

The  Court  decreed  that  the  defendant  should  pay  the  note 
according  to  its  terms  on  the  demand  of  the  plaintiff. 

Application  made  to  the  Court  by  Madame  Germain,  widow, 
praying  that  she  be  permitted  to  withdraw  from  the  office  of  surro- 
gate guardian  of  the  minor  Langdoc,  which  ha:  late  husband  held. 

Another  application  made  to  the  Court  by  Madame  Pierre 
Godin,  widow,  saying  that  her  late  husband  had  been  intrusted 
with  the  office  of  surrogate  guardian  of  the  minor  child  of  the 
late  M.  Labbe  and  praying  that  she  be  permitted  to  withdraw  from 
the  said  office,  which  her  late  husband  held. 

The  Court  decreed  that  in  accordance  with  the  prayers  of 
Mesdames  Germain  and  Pierre  Godin,  widows,  it  shall  be  per- 
mitted them  to  summon  an  assembly  of  relatives  and  friends  to 
proceed  to  the  election  of  two  surrogate  guardians,  who  shall 
inform   themselves   perfectly   of   the   interests   of   the   minors. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Friday,  February,  11. 

F.  Saucier. 

port  of  the  troops.    For  that  reason  Montgomery  made  this  demand  upon  the  Cahokians. 
— Introduction   p.  Ixxxii.  and  post,  p.  545. 


38  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Court  du  i8,  fevrier  1780. 
President  M^  trotier  M^  martin 

M^  Gratiot  M^  B*^  saucier 

M''  Girardin  Present. 

J"  B*^  Lacroix,  Demendeur.    m^  Levy,  Defendeur.       ^ 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  Defendeur  pour  Deux  tombr^  de 
mays  quil  a  acheter  a  Fancan  de  feu  Lapierr,  pour  Le  Compte  de 
leur  Societe. 

Le  Defendeur  raporte  quayant  acheter  Ses  Deux  tombre  de 
mays,  En  Societe  avec  le  Demendeur  a  L'ancan  de  feu  S^  La- 
pierre.  ayant  Ete  fait  par  M^.  trotier. 

Le  Demendeur  Et  Le  Defendeur  poursuive  Mons^.  trotier  pour 
quil  Leur  Soit  fourni  une  Sertaine  quantity  de  mays  a  eux  adjug^ 
aud^  ancan,  que  leur  manque  Sur  Les  deux  ditte  tombre. 

IVP  trotier  raporte  que  Le  Demendeur  ou  Le  Defendeur  auroit 
du  faire  prendre  Le  mays  quil  Leur  a  Ete  adjuge  aud*  ancan,  et 
non  pas  L' avoir  Lesse  trois  ou  quatre  mois  Dans  un  Grenier  a 
La  discretion  des  rats  Et  que  Depuis  Ce  tems  il  pouroit  bien  En 
avoir  mange  Se  qui  s'en  manque. 

La  Court  ayant  trouve  que  messieurs  Lacroix  Et  Levy,  ayant 
manque  tres  Ecentiellemant  De  n'avoir  pas  fait  enlever  Le  mays 
quils  avoit  acheter  aud^  ancan,  quil  Est  probable  que  ne  Layant 
Lesser  Sous  Les  Soin  de  personne  Et  De  L'avoir  Lesser  un  Espace 
De  tems  aussi  Considerable  que  Les  rats  ne  leurs  ayent  Causd  tout 
le  Domage  Dont  il  se  plagent. 

Ch^"  Ducharme  Demendeur  pierre  Roy  Defendeur 

Le  Demendeur  poursuit  Le  Defendeur  pour  une  tombr^  De 
mays  quil  Luy  a  Ete  adjuge  a  L' ancan  de  feu  allexis  Courville  Et 
quil  ne  luy  a  point  Ete  Livre  ni  Si  Etant  point  trouve. 

Le  Defendeur  Raporte  quil  a  Et^  Dit  Lors  de  L'ancan  quen  ca 
que  La  quantite  de  mays  Crie  aud^*  ancan  ne  Se  trouva  point  que 
Celuy  a  qui  il  En  Seroit  adjuge  ne  Seroit  tenu  a  paye  qu'en  qua 
que  la  quantite  Estime  si  trouve. 

La  Court  ayant  trouve  que  Le  Demendeur  a  trop  tarde  a  faire 
Enlever  Le  mays  que  personne  n'est  Dans  Le  Cas  de  La  Luy 

1  The  tombre  was  a  two-wheeled  wooden  cart,  made  without  iron,  in  common  use  among 
the  French. 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1780        39 

At  a  Court,  February  18,  1780. 
President,  M.  Trottier.         M.  Martin. 
M.  Gratiot.  M.  Saucier. 

M.  Girardin.  Present. 

Jean  Bte.  Lacroix,  Plaintiff,  vs.  M.  Levy,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  two  cart-loads^  of  corn, 
which  he  bought  on  the  account  of  their  partnership  at  the  auction 
of  the  goods  of  the  late  Lapierre. 

The  defendant  states  that  he,  in  partnership  with  the  plaintiff, 
bought  the  two  loads  of  corn  at  the  auction  of  the  goods  of  the 
late  Lapierre,  which  was  held  by  M.  Trottier. 

The  plaintiff  and  defendant  sue  M.  Trottier  that  there  be  fur- 
nished them  a  certain  quantity  of  corn,  which  was  lacking  in  two 
cart-loads  knocked  down  to  them  at  the  said  auction. 

M.  Trottier  reports  that  the  plaintiff  or  the  defendant  should 
have  had  the  corn,  which  was  adjudged  them  at  the  said  auction, 
removed  and  should  not  have  left  it  three  or  four  months  in  the 
granery  to  the  discretion  of  the  rats,  and  that  during  that  time 
there  could  easily  have  been  eaten  what  is  lacking. 

The  Court  found  that  MM.  Lacroix  and  Levy  were  very 
negligent  in  not  having  the  corn,  which  they  bought  at  the  said 
auction,  carted  away;  and  that,  since  they  had  not  left  it  under 
the  care  of  anyone  and  had  left  it  for  so  considerable  a  length  of 
time,  the  rats  had  caused  all  the  damage  of  which  they  complain. 
Charles  DuCharme,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Roy,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  a  cart-load  of  corn  which 
had  been  knocked  down  to  him  at  the  auction  of  the  goods  of  the 
late  Alexis  Courville  and  which  was  not  delivered  to  him,  since  it 
could  not  be  found. 

The  defendant  reports  that,  at  the  time  of  the  auction,  it  was 
said  that  in  case  the  quantity  of  corn  cried  out  at  the  said  auction 
was  not  found,  he,  to  whom  it  should  be  adjudged,  would  be  held  to 
pay  only  in  case  that  the  estimated  quantity  should  be  found  there. 

The  Court  found  that  the  plaintiff  delayed  too  long  in  having 
the  corn  carted  away,  and  that  no  one  is  bound  to  furnish  it  to 
him,  since  he  left  it  in  the  care  of  nobody;  and  furthermore  that  it 


40  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

foumir  ne  Layant  Lessd  sous  La  Garde  de  personne  Et  qu'en  outre 
il  a  Ete  Dit  a  L'ancan  publiquement  que  Ceux  qui  acheteroit  du 
mays  il  ne  Luy  Seroit  livr^  que  D'autant  quil  Si  trouveroit  Vu  que 
les  Estimateur  auroit  pu  Se  tromper  Dans  Lestimation. 

aplication  faite  En  Court  par  J".  B*®  H^'"  Lacroix  qui  Demande 
La  vente  de  quelques  Effest  appartenant  au  S^  Sills  quil  a  Entre 
Ses  main  pour  une  Somme  De  quatrevingt  trois  livres  que  led* 
Sieur  Luy  Doit  suivant  L'etat  qu'il  En  a  produit  En  Court. 

La  Court  ayant  observe  que  le  S^  Sills  etant  parti  dici  pour  le 
Service  Des  Etat,  que  led*  Sieur  Lacroix  Est  Condann^  a  atendre 
Vue  que  ledit  Sieur  Sills  peut  revenir  au  premier  Jour. 

La  Court  a  Condann^  tout  Les  perdant  de  cette  Court  a  pay^ 
tous  Les  fraix  de  Justice. 

La  Court  Est  ajourn^  a  Vendredy  17^*  mars  1780. 
f  saucier,  Greffier.  f  trottier. 

a  une  Court  Vendredy  17  mars  1780. 
President  Monsieur  trotier  M'"  Beaulieu 

M^  Girardin  M^  B*®  saucier 

Present. 
M^  Decostle  Demendeur  ant  Lusser  Defendeur 

Le  Demendeur  poursuit  Le  Defendeur  pour  un  Compte  montant 
a  La  Somme  de  deux  Cent  Soixante  et  dixneuf  Livre  En  pelleted. 

Le  Defendeur  produit  un  billet  de  Vingt  six  Livres  En  pelle- 
terie  passe  a  Son  ordre  par  le  Demendeur  qui  Declare  quapres 
avoir  regl^  tout  Leur  Compte  il  Luy  auroit  Consenti  Se  billet  pour 
reglement  de  tout  Compte  Le  Defendeur  produit  Le  meme  Compte 
qui  Declare  avoir  Deja  regie  avec  le  Defendeur  montant  a  la 
Somme  de  Six  Cent  Cinquante  huit  Livres  quinze  Sols. 

Le  Demendeur  Est  Condann^  a  payer  au  Defendeur  Le  billet 

quil  Luy  a  Consenti  de  vingt  Six  Livres  En  pelleterie  et  que  tant 

qu'a  Leur  Compte  il  paroit  par  led*  billet  quils  ont  Et^  regl^  Et 

que  le  demendeur  Luy  redevoit  Sette  Somme  Et  a  paye  Les  fraix. 

ANTOINE  Lusser,  Demendeur.     Louigau,  Defendeur. 

Le  Demendeur  poursuit  Le  Defendeur  pour  Lavoir  tax^  Da- 
voir  pris  ches  luy  une  p'*.  Dattel. 

1  The  clerk  has  made  a  slip  here  and  so  mixed  his  plaintiffs  and  defendants  that  the  passage 
is  difficult  to  interpret. 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1780  41 

was  publicly  said  at  the  auction  that,  to  those,  who  bought 
corn,  there  would  be  delivered  only  as  much  as  there  was,  seeing 
that  the  appraiser  might  have  made  a  mistake  in  the  estimate. 

An  application  made  to  the  court  by  Jean  Bte.  Hubert  LaCroix 
who  requests  the  sale  of  some  effects  belonging  to  M.  Sills,  which 
he  has  in  his  possession,  to  pay  the  sum  of  eighty-three  livres, 
which  the  said  gentleman  owes  him  according  to  a  statement, 
which  he  has  produced  in  Court. 

The  Court,  having  considered  that  the  said  M.  Sills  has  gone  away 
on  the  service  of  the  State,  condemned  the  said  M.  LaCroix  to  wait, 
seeing  that  the  said  M.  Sills  will  return  on  the  first  possible  day. 

The  Court  condemned  all  those  losing  in  this  session  to  pay  all 
costs  of  justice. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Friday,  March  17,  1780. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk  F.  Trottier. 

At  a  Court,  Friday,  March  17,  1780. 
President,  M.  Trottier.         M.  Beaulieu. 
M.  Girardin.  M.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Present. 
M.  Decostle,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Ant.  Lussier,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  an  account  amounting  to 
the  sum  of  two  hundred  and  seventy-nine  livres  in  peltries. 

The  defendant  produces  a  note  of  twenty-six  livres  in  peltries, 
made  to  his  order  by  the  plaintiff,  which  declares  that,  after  having, 
squared  up  their  account,  he  had  given  this  note  in  final  settlement. 
The  defendant  produces  the  same  account,  which  declares  that  he 
had  already  settled  with  the  defendant  [plaintiff?]^  to  the  sum  of 
six  hundred  and  fifty-eight  livres  fifteen  sols. 

The  plaintiff  is  condemned  to  pay  the  defendant  the  note  for 
twenty-six  livres  in  peltries  which  he  has  given  him;  and  as  to 
their  account,  it  appears  from  the  said  note  to  have  been 
squared  up  and  that  the  plaintiff  still  owes  this  sum;  and  he  is 
condemned  to  pay  the  costs. 

Antoine  Lussier,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Louigaud,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  having  accused  him  of 
having  taken  a  pair  of  hames  from  his  house. 


42  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

Le  Defendeur  dit  navoir  Jamais  Dit  que  le  Demendeur  Luy 
avoit  vole  Cette  p  Dattelle  Et  qu'on  Luy  avoit  Dit  Seulement  quon 
avoit  Vue  une  p^  a  peu  pres  pareil  ches  le  Demendeur. 

La  Court  a  renvoye  Le  present  Comme  ne  pouvant  faire 
auqu'ne  Decision  Sur  Cette  affaire  Et  a  Condanne  Le  Demendeur 
a  payer  Les  fraix. 

La  Court  Est  ajourne  a  vendredy  7®  Davril. 
f  trottier.  f  saucier  greffier. 

a  une  Court  du  7^^  D'avril  1780. 
Pr^sidant  Capt.  trotier  antoine  Girardin 

Michel  Beaulieu  B*®  Saucier. 

Present, 
a  La  demende  Des  CReensie  de  feu  Milhomme  La  Court  a 
ddside  qu'une  Encans  Des  biens  Dellesse  par  Led*  feu  Mil- 
homme Sera  fait  Dimanche  prochain  9^^  Du  Present  mois  pour 
Satisfaire  a  Ses  Deptes  Et  Si  plus  il  y  a  il  Sera  partage  a  Ses 
Enfans. 

Par  ordre  f  trottier.  fr  saucier. 

A  une  Cour  du  21  D'avril.  1780. 
President  Capt.  trottier  pierre  Martin 

Michel  Beaulieu  Bap*^  Saucier 

antoine  Girardin  Present. 

Representation  fait  a  La  Cour  par  Joseph  lepage  a  Legar  du 
negre  du  Mon^  trotier  pour  une  insulte  faite  par  Luy  a  La  garde 
Demandant  que  Le  dit  negre  Soit  puni  Comme  il  Le  meritte  ayant 
tres  mal  parle  Et  ayant  menace  de  Ce  revenger  Contre  Ceux  qui 
entreprendroit  de  Sen  saisir. 

apres  avoir  Examine  Les  plaintes  porte  Contre  Ledit  negre  La 
Cour  a  Decide  que  M^  trotier  fera  Donner  a  Son  negre  vingt  Cinq 
Coupt  de  fouet,  pour  La  Premire  faute  quil  a  Comis  Et  plus  a 
lavenir  Si  il  retombe  Dans  le  meme  cas. 

La  Cour  est  ajourne  au Vendredy  5^^  may. 

f  trottier  f  saucier  Greffier. 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1780  43 

The  defendant  says  that  he  never  said  that  the  plaintiff  had 
stolen  this  pair  of  hames,  but  that  he  had  been  told  that  a  pair 
very  similar  to  his  had  been  seen  at  the  house  of  the  plaintiff. 

The  Court  dismissed  the  present  suit,  since  it  is  impossible  to 
reach  any  decision  in  this  case,  and  condemned  the  plaintiff  to 
pay  the  costs. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Friday,  April  7. 
F.  Trottier.  F.  Saucier,  Clerk. 

At  a  Court,  April  7,  1780. 
President,  Capt.  Trottier.       Antoine  Girardin. 
Michel  Beaulieu.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Present. 
On  the  demand  of  the  creditors  of  the  late  Milhomme  the 
Court  decided  that  an  auction  of  the  goods  left  by  the  said  late 
Milhomme  shall  be  held  next  Sunday,  the  9th  of  the  present 
month,  in  order  to  pay  his  debts;  and  if  there  is  a  surplus,  it  shall 
be  divided  among  his  children. 

By  order,  F.  Trottier.  F.  Saucier. 

At  a  Court,  April  21,  1780. 
President,  Capt.  Trottier.  Pierre  Martin. 
Michel  Beaulieu.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Antoine  Girardin.  Present. 

A  representation  made  to  the  Court  by  Joseph  Lepage  in  regard 
to  a  negro  belonging  to  M.  Trottier  on  account  of  an  insult  made 
by  him  to  the  guard,  and  he  demands  that  the  said  negro  be  pun- 
ished as  he  deserves,  since  he  used  very  bad  language  and  threat- 
ened to  revenge  hitaself  on  those  who  should  undertake  to  seize 
him. 

After  having  examined  the  complaints  brought  against  the  said 
negro,  the  Court  decided  that  M.  Trottier  shall  have  the  negro 
given  twenty-five  strokes  with  the  whip  for  the  first  offence  he  has 
committed,  and  more  in  the  future,  if  he  does  it  again. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  Friday,  May  5. 
F.  Trottier.  F.  Saucier,  Clerk. 


44  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

Vendredy  5^®  may  1780. 
Pr^sidant  Capt.  trotier  pierre  Martin 

ant.  Girardin  B*®  saucier. 

Present. 
Gabriel  Constant  Demendeur.    Janot  Lapance  Defendeur 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  Defendeur  pour  un  Soc  quil  Luy 
doit. 

Le  Defendeur  repond  quil  Devoit  Donner  un  Soc  ou  trente 
Livres  en  pelleterie  au  Demendeur.  Et  quen  outre  il  Devoit 
payer  a  M^  trotier  Les  trente  Livres  Layant  trensporte  [sic]  pour 
Ce  quil  devoit  a  L'ancan  de  feu  Lapierre  Ce  que  le  Defendeur 
a  fait  Sur  quoy  Mon'"  trotier  Luy  a  dit  que  cela  ne  pressoit  pas 
Et  quil  L'acceptoit  pour  Cette  Somme. 

Le  Deffendeur  a  pret^  Serment  quil  Etoit  Convenu  De  payer 
au  demendeur  Dix  Ecu  En  pelleterie  ou  un  Soc  ne  pouvant 
Donner  un  Soc  il  Est  Condanner  a  payer  Les  Dix  Ecu  Comptant. 
Et  Le  Demendeur  a  payer  Les  frais. 

application  fait  par  Sieur  ant  armant  Demandant  quil  Soit  fait 
un  [word  illegible]  ancan  Des  Biens  de  feu  Vadboncoeur  Et 
Elir  un  tuteur  au  mineurs  Et  Sexposant  a  ce  que  Le  Gendre 
dud*  Deffucnt  Le  Soyent  disant  que  Le  Deffucnt  Vadboncour 
La  prier  de  Sinteresser  a  Se  Sujet. 

La  Cour  a  Demander  aud*  S'"  armant  quelque  Ecrit,  ou  quelque 
autre  preuve  Comme  quoy  il  est  Charge  de  faire  Executer  Les 
Derniere  Volonte  de  feu  vadboncoeur. 

franjois  alexandre  ayant  paru  et  prete  Serment  Sur  Ce  quil 
a  Entendu  Dire  par  feu  Vadboncoeur  a  M^  Girardin  et  a  dit  que 
quelque  tems  avant  Le  dessay  de  Son  beau  pere  il  La  Envoye 
Cherch^  M^  Girardin  Et  quil  Luy  a  dit  a  luy  parlant  quil  Le 
prioit  de  vouloir  Bien  prendre  Les  interest  de  Ses  Enfans  Le 
Chargant  dagir  En  Consequence  pour  quil  ne  leur  Soit  fait  au 
qu'un  tort  Ce  que  M^  Girardin  a  dit  avoir  promis  de  faire. 

La  Cour  a  desside  quil  Seroit  nomd  un  tuteur  Et  Subroger 

1  The  small  piece  of  iron  attached  to  the  plow. 

2  The  meaning  is  not  clear. 

'  The  ecu  was  equal  to  three  livres,  or  sixty  cents. 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1780  45 

Friday,  May  5,  1780. 
President,  Capt.  Trottier.  Pierre  Martin. 

Ant.  Girardin.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Present. 
Gabriel  Constant,  Plaintiff  vs.  Janot  Lapance,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  a  plowshare  ^  which  he  owes 
him. 

The  defendant  answers  that  he  ought  to  give  a  plowshare  or 
thirty  Hvres  in  peltries  to  the  plaintiff;  and  besides  he  was  to  pay 
the  thirty  livres  to  M.  Trottier,  since  the  plaintiff  had  assigned  it 
for  what  he  owed  at  the  auction  of  the  goods  of  the  late  Lapierre. 
This  the  defendant  had  done,  but  M.  Trottier  had  said  to  him  that 
there  was  no  hurry  and  had  accepted  the  assignment  for  that  sum.^ 

The  defendant  made  oath  that  he  had  agreed  to  pay  the  plaintiff 
ten  ecus  ^  in  peltries  or  a  plowshare,  and  not  being  able  to  give  the 
plowshare  he  is  condemned  to  pay  the  ten  ecus  in  cash.  The 
plaintiff  is  condemned  to  pay  the  costs. 

An  application  made  by  M.  Ant.  Harmand,  asking  that  an 
.  .  [word  illegible]  .  .  auction  of  the  goods  of  the  late  Vadeboncoeur 
be  held  and  an  election  of  a  guardian  for  the  minors  be  made, 
recommending  that  the  son-in-law  of  the  deceased  be  guardian, 
and  saying  that  the  deceased  Vadeboncoeur  had  begged  him  to 
interest  himself  in  the  subject. 

The  Court  demanded  of  the  said  M.  Harmand  some  writing 
or  other  proof  that  he  was  intrusted  with  the  execution  of  the 
last  will  of  the  late  Vadeboncoeur. 

Francois  Alexandre  appeared  and  made  oath  in  regard  to  what 
he  heard  said  by  the  late  Vadeboncoeur  to  M.  Girardin.  He  said 
that  some  time  before  the  decease  of  his  father-in-law,  the  latter 
sent  him  to  bring  M.  Girardin,  and  that  in  the  course  of  their 
conversation  the  late  Vadeboncoeur  begged  M.  Girardin  to  consent 
to  look  after  the  interests  of  his  children,  charging  him  to  act  so 
that  no  wrong  should  be  done  them.  This  M.  Girardin  had 
promised  to  do. 

The  Court  decided  that  there  be  named  a  guardian  and  a  sur- 
rogate guardian  by  plurality  vote;  and  there  has  been  named 


46  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

tuteur  a  la  pluralite  Des  voix  Et  a  Ete  nom^  francois  alexandre 
tuteur  Et  antoine  Girardin  Subroger  tuteur.  et  quil  Sera  fait  un 
invantaire  De  tous  les  Biens  Et  un  ancan  appres  Si  il  est  a  prop6s 
de  le  faire. 

Demendeur  Louis  Pillet  Defendeur  B*^  saucier 
Le  Demendeur  poursuit  Le  defendeur  pour  quil  Luy  Soit 
rembourse  par  Le  deffendeur  six  minot  de  bl^  Suivant  Lesti- 
mation  qui  En  a  Et6  fait  Comme  ayant  Ete  mange  par  Les  pour- 
feau  qui  ont  Passe  par  Sa  Clauture.  Le  deffendeur  repond  que 
Lorsque  Les  pour^ueau  [sic]  ont  pass^  Dans  les  grins  quil  navoit 
pas  Encore  acheter  de  Mons^  S*.  Pierre  et  que  Le  tort  a  Et^ 
fait  avant  quil  Laye  acheter. 

La  Cour  a  renvoye  Le  present  procet  a  Vendredy  26®  Du  pre- 
sent mois  pour  que  Les  deux  partis  aye  a  produire  Leur  preuve 
La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  Vendredy  26®  may  1780. 
f  trottier  fr.  saucier  GreflSer. 

Vendredy.  9  Juin  1780. 
President  Capt.  trotier.  pierre  martin. 

M".  Cha.  Gratiot.  B^^  Saucier. 

Michel  Beaulieu  Present, 

jn  gte  Mercie  ayant  produit  en  Court  une  requette  Contre 
Le  nome  George  King,  pour  un  Capot  Et  une  paire  de  boucle 
dargent  que  ledit  King  Luy  a  vole,  et  demande  qu'ne  Carabine  a 
present  entre  Les  mains  de  Mons^  f.  trotier  Comm^^  au  d^  Lieu 
Soit  Vendu,  pour  Satisfaire  au  vole  qui  luy  a  ete  fait. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  que  la  ditte  Carabine  Soit  vendu  en  public 
pour  payer  a  M^  Mercie  Se  dont  il  luy  a  Ete  prie  par  led*  Geo. 
King  Et  Si  plus  il  y  a  il  Sera  Depose  Entre  les  mains  du  cherif 
Jusqu'a  Nouvelle  ordre. 

Louis  Pillet  Demendeur    B*®  Saucier  Defendeur 
Le  demendeur  et  Le  defendeur  ayant  produit  Leur  preuve 
r^ciproque. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  que  Le  defendeur  rendroit  au  demendeur 
La  quantite  de  Bl^,  Suivant  Lestimation  faite. 

^  The  minot  contained  three  bushels. 

2  Many  suits  were  caused  by  animals  breaking  through  the  fence  of  the  common  field. 
This  was  the  cultivated  land,  laid  out  in  narrow  strips  which  were  owned  by  individuals. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1780  47 

Francois  Alexandre  as  guardian  and  Antoine  Girardin  as 
surrogate  guardian.  It  has  been  ordered  that  an  inventory  of 
all  the  goods  be  made  and  an  auction  afterwards,  if  it  is  expe- 
dient to  hold  it. 

Louis  Pillet,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Bte.  Saucier,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  that  he  may  be  reimbursed  by 
the  defendant  six  minots^  of  wheat,  which,  according  to  estimate, 
is  the  amount  eaten  by  the  pigs,  which  passed  through  his  fence.' 
The  defendant  answers  that,  at  the  time  the  pigs  passed  into  the 
grain,  he  had  not  yet  bought  the  land  from  M.  St.  Pierre, 
and  that  the  wrong  was  done  before  he  bought  it. 

The  Court  continued  the  present  suit  till  Friday,  the  26th  of 
the  present  month,  in  order  that  the  two  parties  have  time  to 
produce  their  proofs. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Friday,  May  26,  1780 
F.  Trottier.  Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk. 

Friday,  June  9,  1780 
President,  Capt.  Trottier.  Pierre  Martin. 

Charles  Gratiot.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Michel  Beaulieu.  Present. 

Jean  Bte.  Mercier  brought  into  Court  a  petition  against  the 
named  George  King  for  a  coat  and  a  pair  of  silver  buckles,  which 
the  said  King  stole,  and  prays  that  a  rifle  at  present  in  the  hands  of 
M.  Trottier,  commandant  of  the  post,  be  sold  to  indemnify  him 
for  the  theft,  which  has  been  made  from  him. 

The  Court  decreed  that  the  rifle  be  sold  publicly  in  order  to  pay 
M.  Mercier  for  that  which  had  been  taken  from  him  by  the  said 
Geo.  King;  and  if  there  be  a  surplus,  it  shall  be  deposited  in  the 
hands  of  the  sheriff  until  further  orders. 

Louis  Pillet,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Bte  Saucier,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  and  defendant  produced  their  proofs  severally. 
The  Court  decreed  that  the  defendant  render  to  the  plaintiff 
the  quantity  of  wheat  according  to  the  estimate  made. 

The  whole  field  was  protected  by  a  fence  built  by  the  community,  each  proprietor  being 
responsible  for  that  part  of  the  fence  on  his  land.  A  gate  near  the  village  gave  access  to 
the  field.  Damages  for  the  injury  to  crops  could  be  collected  from  the  person  through 
whose  fence  stray  animals  passed. — Reynolds,  Pioneer  History,  31  and  48. 


48  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

La  Cour  Etant  assemble  pour  prendre  Les  arengement  Les 
plus  convenable  pour  Les  affaires  de  feu  Sieur  Bellau. 

EUe  a  decide  quil  Sera  fait  un  exament  Exacte  de  tout  Ses 
papier  afin  de  prendre  Le  plus  quil  Sera  possible  Connoissance 
de  Ses  affaires,  Et  ensuitte  nomera  un  Sindic  pour  Gerer  toute 
Ses  affaires  Suivant  Comme  il  Sera  ordonnd  par  la  Cour. 

La  Court  Et  ajourn^  a  2  heure  apr^s  midy  9.  Du  present. 

f  saucier  Greffier.  f  trottier. 

9.  juin  1780.     2  heure  apres  Midy. 
President  Capt.  trotier.  Pierre  Martin. 

M"  Ch.  Gratiot.  B^^  Saucier. 

Present. 
Louis  Louigau  Demandeur  James  finne  Defendeur 

Le  Demendeur  pour  Suit  Le  defendeur  pour  Le  payement 
d'un  Cheval  quil  Luy  a  tue  a  force  de  Courir  dans  La  prairie  du 
pon  Suivant  La  requette  quil  En  a  prdsent^  En  Cour. 

Le  defendeur  dit  que  C'est  par  L'ordre  du  Colonel  Mont- 
gomery quil  a  pris  le  cheval  pour  en  atrapper  d' autre,  pour  le 
besoin  de  I'etat. 

Thomas  Brady  ayant  pretd  Serment  Sur  Le  S*  Evangile  de 
Dieu,  tout  puissant  de  repondre  au  question  qu'on  Luy  feroit 
et  a  dit  quil  Etoit  temoin  Lorsque  Mons^  James  finnea  pris  le 
cheval  de  Louis  gau  et  quils  ont  Ete  Ensemble  Dans  La  prairie  du 
pon,  mais  que  James  finne  na  point  Couru  Le  dit  Cheval,  et 
quaprds  avoir  atrape  une  jumen  ^  eux  apartenant  quil  auroit 
Lachd  Le  cheval,  qui  Sest  Ensuitte  Battu  avec  un  autre  un  Ser- 
tain  terns  et  quapres  cela  Voyant  que  Le  cheval  avoit  beaucoup 
Sue  quelqu'n  Luy  dire  quil  falloit  Seigner  Led*  cheval  Se  qui 
fit  Sur  Le  Champ  et  que  neanmoins  il  mourut  peu  De  tems 
appres. 

La  Cour  d'une  voix  unanime  a  Condanner  m^  James  finne 
pour  S'etre  Saisi  dud*  cheval  Sans  auqu'ne  ordre  a  pay^  au  Sieur 
Louigau  Son  cheval  suivant  Sa  Valeur. 

pierre  Gagnon  a  et6  nome  par  la  Cour  Sindic  pour  prendre 
Connoissance  des   affaires  de  feu   Michel   Bellau,   et  Ensuitte 

1  Prairie  du  Pont  was  a  hamlet  with  commons  and  common  field,  about  a  mile  south 
of  Cahokia.    See  map  at  end  of  this  volume,  also  note  i,  p.  88. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1780  49 

The  Court  assembled  to  take  the  most  expedient  measures  for 
the  affairs  of  the  late  M.  Bellau. 

It  decided  that  there  shall  be  made  an  exact  examination  of  all 
his  papers  in  order  to  obtain  the  best  possible  information  of  his 
affairs,  and  that  afterwards  there  shall  be  named  a  syndic  to  con- 
duct all  his  affairs  as  he  shall  be  ordered  by  the  Court. 

The  Court  adjourned  till  2  o'clock  in  the  afternoon,  the  9th 
of  the  present  month. 

June  9,  1780,  at  2  o'clock  in  the  afternoon. 
President,  Capt.  Trottier.  Pierre  Martin. 

Ch.  Gratiot.  Bte  Saucier. 

Present. 
Louis  Louigaud,  Plaintiff,  vs.  James  Finney,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  the  payment  of  a  horse, 
which  he  killed  by  running  it  in  the  Prairie  du  Pont,^  according  to 
the  petition  which  he  has  presented  in  Court. 

The  defendent  says  that  he  took  the  horse  by  order  of 
Colonel  Montgomery  in  order  to  catch  another  for  the  need  of  the 
state. 

Thomas  Brady  having  made  oath  on  the  Holy  Gospels  of 
Almighty  God  to  answer  the  question  which  was  put  to  him, 
said  that  he  was  a  witness,  when  M.  James  Finney  took  Loui- 
gaud's  horse,  and  that  they  were  together  in  the  Prairie  du  Pont, 
but  that  James  Finney  did  not  run  the  said  horse;  and  that  after 
catching  a  mare  belonging  to  them,  he  let  the  horse  loose  and 
that  then  it  fought  with  another  horse  for  a  certain  time; 
and  that,  after  noticing  that  the  horse  was  very  sweaty,  some- 
body told  him  that  he  ought  to  bleed  the  said  horse, 
which  he  immediately  did;  that  nevertheless  it  died  shortly  after- 
wards. 

The  Court  unanimously  condemned  M.  James  Finney,  for 
having  taken  the  said  horse  without  any  order,  to  pay  M.  Loui- 
gaud the  value  of  his  horse. 

Pierre  Gagnon  has  been  named  by  the  Court  syndic  to  in- 
form himself  of  the  affairs  of  the  late  Michel  Bellau,  and  to 
administer  them  afterwards  in  a  manner,  which  he  shall  believe 


so  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Gerer  de  la  maniere  quil  Croira  Etre  Le  plus  Convenable  etant 
authorise  par  la  d**^  Cour  D'agir  a  ce  Sujet. 

saucier  Greffier. 
a  une  Court  19  Juin  1780. 
President.  Cap*,  trotier  ant.  Girardin 

Messieurs  Ch.  Gratiot  Pierre  Martin 

Michel  Beaulieu  B*^  Saucier. 

Present. 
La  Court  Etant  assemble  pour  prendre  Le  Serment  de  fidelity 
ainsi  que  Celuy  doffice,  Des  Sieur  Joseph  Lepage  J".  B*®  Lacroix 
Clement  Langlois  ch.  Ducharme  francois  Courie  philipe  Jervais 
antoine  armant,  Comme  ayant  Ete  nome  par  une  assemble  pub- 
lic Dimanche  Dernier  18  du  Courant,  dans  La  Maison  de  M^  fr. 
trotier  Cap^^  Commandant  La  Milice  Des  Cahokias,  pour  prendre 
Leurs  place  Comme  En  qualite  de  Juge  de  paix  &c. 

Les  Suivant  Juges  Mentione  en  L'autre  Part  par  La  Derniere 
Election  faite,  ont  prie  Le  Serment  de  fidelite  aux  Etats,  ainsi 
que  Celuy  de  Juge  de  paix  &c,  Selon  leurs  liste  a  lexeption  de 
Joseph  Lepage  absant. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  que  fr.  Saucier  Soit  appointe  dark  de  la 
Cour. 

Francois  Saucier  a  pris  Serment  de  fidelite  Et  doffice  Et  a  pris 
Sa  place  en  qualite  de  dark. 

Nicolas  Chabaut  a  pris  Serment  de  fidelite  ainsi  que  Celuy 
d'office  et  a  pris  Sa  place  En  qualite  de  Baillif  de  la  Cour. 

Jean  B^®  Hubert  Lacroix  a  remis  a  la  Cour  Sa  Comission  de 
Cherif. 

President  Ch.  Ducharme  francois  Courrie. 

ant.  armant.  J°  B*®  Lacroix. 

philipe  Gervais.  Clement  Langlois 

Present 
Ch  Gratiot  ayant  produit  En  Cour  un  Compte  due  par  La 
Succession  de  feu  ferant  Montant  a  la  Somme  de  Cinq  Soixante 
et  huit  Livres  Seize  Sols. 

Mon^  trotier  a  produit  un  Sertificat  de  B*^  Lamarche  par 
Lequel  il  prove  que  feu  ferrand  luy  Doit  quarante  Sept  Livres 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1780  51 

most  expedient,  being  authorized  by  the  said  Court  to  act  in  this 
matter. 

Saucier,  Clerk. 

At  a  Court  June  19,  1780. 
President,  Capt.  Trottier.  Ant.  Girardin. 
Ch.  Gratiot.  Pierre  Martin. 

Michel  Beaulieu.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Present. 
The  Court  assembled  to  receive  the  oath  of  fidelity  and  that  of 
office  from  MM.  Joseph  Lepage,  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  Clement 
Langlois,  Ch.  DuCharme,  Francois  Courier,  Philippe  Gervais, 
and  Antoine  Harmand,  who  have  been  elected  by  a  public  assem- 
bly, held  last  Sunday,  the  i8th  of  the  present  month,  in  the  house 
of  M.  Fr.  Trottier,  captain  commanding  the  militia  of  Cahokia, 
in  order  that  they  may  take  their  places  as  justices  of  the  peace  etc. 
The  following  justices,  mentioned  in  the  other  part  as  elected 
in  the  last  election,  have  taken  oath  of  fidelity  to  the  States  and 
that  of  justices  of  the  peace  etc.  according  to  the  list,  with  the 
exception  of  Joseph  Lepage  absent. 

The  Court  has  ordered  that  Fr.  Saucier  be  appointed  clerk  of 
the  Court. 

Francois  Saucier  took  the  oath  of  fidelity  and  that  of  office  and 
took  his  place  as  clerk. 

Nicolas  Chabot  took  the  oath  of  fidelity  and  that  of  office  and 
took  his  place  as  bailiff  of  the  Court. 

Jean  Bte.  Hubert  LaCroix  presented  to  the  Court  his  commis- 
sion as  sheriff. 

President,  Ch.  DuCharme.     Francois  Courier. 
Ant.  Harmand.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix. 

Philippe  Gervais.  Clement  Langlois. 

Present. 
Ch.  Gratiot  produced  in  Court  an  account  due  by  the  heirs  of 
the  late  Ferrant  amounting  to  the  sum  of  five  hundred  and  sixty- 
eight  livres  and  sixteen  sols. 

M.  Trottier  produced  a  certificate  of  Bte.  Lamarche  by  which 
he  proves  that  the  late  Ferrant  owed  him  forty-seven  livres  ten  solSj 


52  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

Dix  quil  Luy  a  prete  Ce  qui  fait  Ensemble  La  Somme  de 
Six  Cent  Seize  Livre  Dix  Sols  Le  montant  Des  efifest  de  feu 
ferand  Montant  a  la  Somme  de  Cinq  Cent  Vingt  neuf  Livre 
Cinq. 

La  Cour  a  ordonn^  que  Le  S'^  charle  Gratiot  payeroit  a  M^me 
Le  produit  de  La  vente  Des  Dits  Effest  La  Somme  de  deux  Cent 
quatrevingt  onze  Livres  Seize  Sols  pour  Depte  privil^gi^  Suivant 
Les  Compte  a  luy  present^  Et  Le  reste  Des  Deptes  Seront  tir^  au 
mar  La  Livre. 

Charle  Gratiot  a  produit  En  Cour  un  Compte  Courant  Entre 
luy  et  feu  Michel  Bellau  de  la  Somme  de  Six  Cent  huit  Livres  dix 
Sols  Sur  Lequel  il  Luy  est  due  deux  Cent  Cinquante  Six  Livres 
quatorze  Sols  par  La  Balance  et  Demende  a  La  Cour  que  Cette 
Somme  Luy  Soit  payd  par  Le  Sindic  qui  a  et6  nom6  par  La  Cour 
pour  regler  Les  affaires  du  Dit  feu  Bellau. 

Charles  Gratiot  produit  encore  un  Compte  En  Cour  Contre 
Le  Sieur  Durant  montant  a  la  Somme  de  cinquante  Livres  dix 
Sols  demandant  pareillement  quil  Luy  Soit  pay^  Egallement 
Comme  L' autre. 

approuv^  par  La  Cour  Les  Compte  pr^sent^  par  M^  Ch. 
Gratiot. 

La  Cour  Est  Convenu  que  Les  billet  Due  a  S^  Durant  Ser- 
viront  a  payer  Jusqu'a  La  Conqurance  Des  Deptes  faite  par 
Michel  Bellau  ayant  acheter  Divers  Effest  ici  Des  quels  il  Sest 
Servi  pour  payer  Les  Deptes  de  M^  Durant.  et  quaqu'un 
Compte  ne  Sera  payer  Sans  Etre  aprouve  De  la  Cour. 
La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  Jeudi  29  juin  1780. 
fr  saucier  Greffier  DuCharme  presidans 

a  un  Cour  29  juin  1780 
President  Charle  DuCharme  Joseph  Lepage 

antoine  armant  Clement  Langlois 

francois  Courrie  .  philipe  Jervais 

Present 

Joseph  Lepage  ayant  pris  Sa  place  du  Magistrat,  et  a  pret^ 
Serment  de  fidelite  ainsi  que  Celuy  d'ofice. 

^  A  general  expression  for  the  payment  of  a  proportional  part  of  one's  debts,  without  any 
indication  of  the  exact  percentage. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1780  53 

which  he  had  lent  him,  which  makes  altogether  the  sum  of  six 
hundred  and  sixteen  livres  ten  sols,  the  value  of  the  effects  of  the 
late  Ferrant  amounting  to  the  sum  of  five  hundred  and  twenty- 
nine  livres  and  five  sols. 

The  Court  decreed  that  M.  Charles  Gratiot  should  pay 
directly  from  the  proceeds  of  the  sale  of  the  said  effects  the  sum 
of  two  hundred  and  ninety-one  livres  sixteen  sols  for  the  debt 
entitled  to  preference  according  to  the  account  presented  to  him, 
and  the  remaining  debts  shall  be  drawn  at  the  rate  of  a  mark  in 
the  pound.  ^ 

Charles  Gratiot  produced  in  Court  a  current  account  between 
him  and  the  late  Michel  Bellau  amounting  to  the  sum  of  six  hun- 
dred and  eight  livres  and  ten  sols,  on  which  there  is  due  him  two 
hundred  and  fifty-six  livres  fourteen  sols  as  a  balance  and  prays 
the  Court  that  this  sum  be  paid  him  by  the  syndic,  who  has  been 
named  by  the  Court  to  settle  the  affairs  of  the  said  late  Bellau. 

Charles  Gratiot  produced  also  in  Court  an  account  against  M. 
Durand  amounting  to  the  sum  of  fifty  livres  ten  sols  and  prays  like- 
wise that  it  be  paid  as  well  as  the  other. 

The  accounts  presented  by  M.  Ch.  Gratiot  were  approved  by 
the  Court. 

The  Court  agreed  that  the  notes  due  to  M.  Durand  shall  serve 
for  payment  up  to  the  amount  of  the  debts  made  by  Michel 
Bellau,  since  the  latter  bought  various  goods  here,  which  he 
used  to  pay  the  debts  of  M.  Durand;  and  that  no  account  shall 
be  paid  without  being  approved  by  the  Court. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  June  29,  1780. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  DuCharme,  President. 

At  a  Court,  June  29,  1780. 
President,  Charles  Ducharme.     Joseph  Lepage. 
Antoine  Harmand.  Clement  Langlois. 

Francois  Courier.  Philippe  Gervais. 

Present. 

Joseph  Lepage  took  his  place  as  magistrate  and  took  the  oath 
of  fidelity  and  that  of  office. 

M.  Sanguinette,  merchant  of  St.  Louis,  produced  in  Court  a 


54  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

M^.  Sanguinette  Nego*  a  S*  Louis  a  produit  en  Cour  un  Etat 
de  pelleterie  prete  a  M'"  Durant  demant  [sic]  que  La  M^me  quantity 
des  d**^  pelleterie  Luy  Soit  rendu  Suivant  Leurs  Convention. 

Et  a  produit  Encore  une  reconnoissance  du  Sieur  Durant  pour 
Le  voyage  d'un  homme  a  Michelimaquina  quil  luy  a  fourni  et  un 
chodiere  quil  Luy  a  prete. 

M^.  Sanguinette  demande  a  la  Cour  de  condanner  M^  Durant, 
a  Luy  payer  interest  des  pelleterie  prete  Comme  Le  tens  de  la  luy 
rendre  etant  echti,  ainsi  que  pour  Thomme  quil  Luy  a  fourni  pour 
Le  Voyage  de  Michilimaquina. 

La  Cour  a  acorde  a  M^.  Sanguinette  que  M^  Durant  payera 
interest  Des  pelleterie  quil  luy  pr^te,  ainsi  que  pour  L'homme  quil 
Luy  a  fourni  Comme  ayant  Besoin  de  Ses  objest  presentement,  et 
que  F interest  Sera  payable  de  Ce  Jour. 

Le  Sieur  Isaac  Levy  a  presente  a  la  Cour  un  mandat,  tire  Sur 
M^  Cerre,  par  J'on  Conn  de  trente  piastre  gourde  que  M^  Cerr^ 
refuse  de  paye  Et  Ce  mem  manda  Luy  a  Ete  remis  par  Joseph 
Lapense  En  payment  D'un  Cheval  quil  Luy  a  Vendu. 

Joseph  Lapance  ayant  parru  a  dit  quil  avoit  vendu  un  Cheval  a 
Jonn  Conn  pour  La  Somme  de  trente  piastre  Gourde  par  un 
Mandat  tire  Sur  M^  Cerre. 

La  Cour  a  Condanne  Le  Sieur  Jonn  Conn  a  paye  le  billet  quil  a 

consent!  de  trente  piastre  Gourde  et  a  payer  Les  fraise  Et  a  pareil- 

lement  Condanne  Joseph  Lapance  a  payer  a  M^  Levy  pareille 

Smmoe  Sauve  a  prendre  tel  a  rangement  quil  voudront  Entre  Eux. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourn^  a  jeudi  6.  de  juillet. 

f  saucier  Clark  DuCharme  presidans 

a  une  Cour  jeudi  6.  de  juillet.  1780. 
Presidant.  Ch^^  Ducharme  Joseph  lepage 

ant.  arment  Clement  Langlois 

fran.  Courrie  philipe  jervais 

present 
FR.  MARTIN  Demeudeur  Jo^  alary  Defendeur 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  defendeur  Suivant  Sa  requette  pour 

1  For  notice  of  Cerr^,  see  Introduction,  p.  xx.,  note  2. 

2  The  piastre  was  a  Spanish  coin  equal  in  value  to  our  dollar.  The  word  gourde,  which 
appears  always  in  the  above  combination,  seems  to  add  nothing  to  the  idea,  for  piastre  and 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1780  55 

statement  of  peltries  loaned  M.  Durand  and  prays  that  the  same 
quantity  of  peltries  be  returned  to  him  according  to  their  agree- 
ment. 

And  he  also  produced  an  acknowledgement  by  M.  Durand  for 
the  journey  of  a  man,  whom  he  furnished,  to  Michillimackinac, 
and  for  a  copper  kettle,  which  he  lent  him. 

M.  Sanguinette  prays  the  Court  to  condemn  M.  Durand  to  pay 
him  interest  on  the  loan  of  the  peltries,  since  the  time  for  returning 
them  has  expired,  and  also  for  the  wages  of  the  man,  whom  he 
furnished  for  the  journey  to  Michillimackinac. 

The  Court  granted  M.  Sanguinette  that  M.  Durand  shall  pay 
interest  on  the  peltries,  which  he  loaned  him,  and  also  on  the  wages 
of  the  man  whom  he  furnished,  since  he  has  need  of  his  prop- 
erty now,  and  that  the  interest  shall  be  payable  from  this  day. 

M.  Isaac  Levy  presented  to  the  Court  a  draft  drawn  on  M. 
Cerr^^  by  John  Conn  for  thirty  piastres  gourdes,"^  which  M.  Cerr^ 
refuses  to  pay;  and  this  same  draft  was  given  him  by  Joseph 
Lapancd  in  payment  for  a  horse,  which  he  sold  him. 

Joseph  Lapance  having  appeared  said  that  he  had  sold  a  horse 
to  John  Conn  for  the  sum  of  thirty  piastres  gourdes  paid  by  a 
draft  drawn  on  M.  Cerre. 

The  Court  condemned  M.  John  Conn  to  pay  the  note  for  thirty 
piastres  gourdes,  which  he  drew,  and  to  pay  the  costs;  and  likewise 
condemned  Joseph  Lapance  to  pay  M.  Levy  the  same  sum,  subject 
to  making  such  arrangements  between  themselves  as  they  wished. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  July  6. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  DuCharme,  President. 

At  a  Court,  July  6,  1780. 
President,  Ch.  DuCharme.  Joseph  Lepage. 

Ant.  Harmand.  Clement  Langlois. 

Fran.  Courier  Philippe  Gervais. 

Present. 
Fr.  Martin,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jos.  Alarie,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  according  to  his  petition  for  a 
rifle,  which  he  left  at  the  house  of  the  widow  Germain  as  security 

piastre  gourde  are  used  synonymously.  It  is  possible,  however,  that  the  word  gourde  is  used 
to  disilnjjuish  between  the  metal  piastre  and  the  paper. 


56  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

une  Carabine  quil  avoit  Less^  Ches  Madame  Veuve  Germain  En 
depusit  [?]  pour  une  quantite  de  farine  quil  Luy  devoit  et  que 
Ledit  defendeur  a  fait  Saisir  En  Son  absence  Laditte  Carabine 
Et  Sen  est  Servie  Jusqua  Son  retour. 

Le  deffendeur  a  produit  des  Billet  pour  La  La  [sic]  Somme  de 
trois  Cent  quatrevingt  treize  Livres  En  pelleterie  qui  Luy  Sont 
due  par  Le  demendeur  Et  Echue. 

Le  demendeur  offre  a  payer  Ses  Billet  Et  que  Le  deffendeur 
Soit  Condanner  a  Luy  payer  sa  Caribine  Cent  piastre  Comme 
Elle  a  coute. 

La  Cour  a  decider  que  La  Caribine  du  demendeur  Sera  Estim^ 
par  trois  personne  Conoissante  Et  que  Le  deffendeur  Seroit  Con- 
danner a  prendre  Laditte  Carabine  au  prix  de  Lestimation  a  deduire 
Sur  Les  Billet  quil  Luy  Sont  due  par  Le  demendeur  Et  a  payer 
Les  fraix  de  Justice  pour  Setre  Servie  de  Laditte  Carabine.  Sauve 
au  demendeur  a  la  reprendre  Si  il  Le  Veut  et  a  payer  Ses  Billet. 
Michel  Dubois  Demendeur  fr.  martin  Defendeur 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  defendeur  suivant  Sa  requette  pour 
quil  Luy  Soit  fait  reparation  dhonneur  pour  Lavoir  trete  d'un 
Coquin  et  que  Setant  vue  trete  de  La  Sorte  il  a  pris  Le  parti  de  Le 
Lesser  quoique  Son  Engage.  Et  declare  que  le  Defendeur  Luy  a 
retenu  tout  Ce  quil  avoit  dans  Sans  [sic]  voiture  Et  a  deffendu  au 
personne  qui  Se  Sont  trouve  present  de  ne  point  Le  retirer  Suivant 
Le  Certificat  quil  a  produit  En  Cour. 

Le  deffendeur  declare  quil  est  vray  quil  a  trete  Le  demendeur 
de  Coquin  Mais  que  Ce  netoit  qu'an  Cas  que  Le  d^  Demendeur 
Venoit  a  le  quitter  Vue  quil  n'auroit  pas  pue  trouver  un  autre 
homme  a  Sa  place. 

Le  demendeur  declare  Encore  qu'apres  avoir  Et^  tretd  de 
coquin  et  de  sclave  quil  Se  trouvoit  indigne  de  rester  au  Service  du 
deffendeur  Et  demande  que  Les  effest  que  Led^  deffendeur  Luy  a 
retenu  Montant  Environ  a  la  Somme  de  Cent  Livres  en  pelleterie 
Luy  Soit  renbourse  par  Le  defendeur  ainsi  que  Ses  gages. 

prinouvaux  ayant  paru  a  pret^  Serment  de  dire  La  Verity  et  a 
dit  quil  avoit  Entendu  dire  au  S^  Cadien  G^nerallement  tout  Ce 
quil  declare  dans  Son  Certificat. 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1780  57 

for  a  quantity  of  flour,  which  he  owed  the  defendant ;  and  he  says 
that  the  defendant  had  caused  the  aforesaid  rifle  to  be  seized 
in  his  absence  and  used  it  until  his  return.* 

The  defendant  produced  notes  for  the  sum  of  three  hundred 
and  ninety-three  livres  in  peltries,  which  are  due  him  by  the 
plaintiff  and  have  matured. 

The  plaintiff  offers  to  pay  his  notes;  and  prays  that  the  defend- 
ant be  condemned  to  pay  him  for  the  rifle  the  one  hundred  piastres 
which  it  cost. 

The  Court  decided  that  the  value  of  the  plaintiff's  rifle  shall 
be  appraised  by  three  competent  persons  and  that  the  defendant 
be  condemned  to  accept  the  rifle  at  the  appraised  price  and  to  de- 
duct the  amount  from  the  notes,  which  are  due  him  from  the 
plaintiff;  and  to  pay  the  costs  of  justice  for  having  used  the  rifle, 
reserving  the  right  to  the  plaintiff  to  take  back  his  rifle  if  he  wishes 
and  to  pay  his  notes. 

Michel  Dubois,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Fr.  Martin,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant,  for  the  purpose,  according 
to  his  petition,  that  there  be  made  him  reparation  of  honor 
because  he  has  been  called  a  rascal  and  has  been  so  treated  by 
the  defendant  that  he  resolved  to  leave  him  although  in  his  employ. 
And  he  further  declares  that  the  defendant  has  retained  all  he 
had  in  his  boat  and  has  forbidden  the  people  who  are  present  to 
remove  it  according  to  a  certificate  which  he  brought  into  Court. 

The  defendant  declares  it  is  true  that  he  called  the  plaintiff  a 
rascal ;  but  it  was  only  when  the  plaintiff  was  on  the  point  of  leaving 
him  and  because  he  could  not  find  anyone  to  take  his  place. 

The  plaintiff  further  declares  that  after  being  called  a 
rascal  and  a  slave,  he  found  it  demeaning  to  remain  in  the  service 
of  the  defendant  and  demands  that  his  property  amounting  to 
about  the  sum  of  a  hundred  livres  in  peltries,  which  the  defendant 
has  retained,  be  given  back  to  him  and  his  wages  paid. 

Prenouvau  having  appeared  made  oath  to  tell  the  truth  and 
said  that  in  general  he  had  heard  M.  Cadien  say  all  that  he  de- 
clares in  his  certificate. 

^  For  further  particulars,  see  p.  533.  ~ 


58  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

alexis  Brisson  ayant  Paru  a  prete  Serment  de  dire  La  verity  et 
a  dit  quil  est  vray  quils  ont  trete  Le  dit  demendeur  de  Coquin  mais 
que  Ce  netoit  que  Sur  Le  menace  quil  Luy  fesoit  de  le  quitter  dans 
Le  terns  ou  il  avoit  plus  Besoin  de  luy. 

La  Cour  apres  avoir  Entendu  reciproquement  Les  deux  partie, 
a  Condanner  Le  deffendeur  a  rendre  Exactement  au  Demendeur 
Les  Effets  quil  luy  appartienent  Et  au  demendeur  a  payer  Les  fraix. 

Mons^  Gabriel  Cerre  residant  Sur  La  rive  Espagnol  a  fait  La 
demende  a  La  Cour  de  La  part  de  M^  Le  Commandant  de  partie 
Espagnol  de  fournir  vingt  Cinq  homme  pour  Se  Joindre  a  une 
meme  quantite  quil  fourni  pour  posser  une  Garde  a  Landroit  que 
I'on  trouvera  Le  plus  propre  pour  veiller  et  Evitter  toute  Surprise 
de  La  part  de  nos  Enemis,  Et  quel  Sera  releve  tous  Les  quinze 
Jour. 

La  Cour  a  decider  que  dici  a  Lundy  prochain  il  Sera  pris  Des 
arrangements  pour  Cette  Expedition  Vue  quil  est  tres  a  propos  de 
Le  faire. 

pierre  Gagnon  a  produit  En  Cour  Le  Compte  Des  payement 
quil  a  fait  au  Creancie  de  feu  Bellau  Suivant  Lancan  quil  a  fait 
faire  Et  a  Ete  approuve. 

une  requette  adresse  au  majistras  Contre  Ignace  Chatigni  pour 
Examinir  Si  il  est  Coupable  ou  non,  Des  accusation  faite  Contre 
Luy. 

La  Cour  a  renvoye  La  presente  Examination  a  Dimanche  neuf 
du  Cou^*  Comme  ayant  Deux  Magistrat  de  moin. 

augustin  ange  Sest  rendu  Cotion  de  La  personne  d'lgnace 
chatignie,  Jusqu'au  Jour  ou  il  Doit  Etre  interoger. 

La  Cour  Est  ajournd  au  9^  du  Cour^*. 
f  saucier  Clark  DuCharme  presdan 

a  une  Cour  du  25  Juillet. 
President  M^  Ch.  Ducharme  Clement  Langlois 

ant.  armant  philipe  Jervais 

francois  Courie 

La  Cour  Etant  assemble  pour  prendre  Des  arengement  pour 
regler  Les  affaires  de  feu  Jonn  Conn,  et  a  nom^  francois  Saucier 

1  During  the  summer  of  1780  there  were  many  rumors  of  expected  attacks  by  the  British, 
and  besides  the  one  in  May  another  attack  on  the  Illinois  villages  was  actually  made  on  July 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1780  59 

Alexis  Brisson  appeared  and  made  oath  to  tell  the  truth  and 
said  that  it  is  true  that  they  called  the  said  plaintifif  a  rascal; 
but  it  was  only  after  the  threat,  which  he  made,  of  quitting  at  a 
time  when  there  was  great  need  of  him. 

The  Court,  after  having  heard  severally  the  two  parties, 
condemned  the  defendant  to  restore  accurately  to  the  plaintifiF  all 
the  property  belonging  to  him,  and  condemned  the  plaintiff  to 
pay  the  costs. 

M.  Gabriel  Cerre,  a  resident  of  the  Spanish  bank  of  the  river, 
requests  the  Court  on  behalf  of  the  commandant  of  the  Spanish  ter- 
ritory to  furnish  twenty-five  men  to  join  with  a  like  number,  which 
he  will  furnish,  for  the  purpose  of  placing  a  guard  at  a  place,  which 
will  be  found  most  convenient,  to  watch  and  so  avoid  any  surprise 
by  the  enemy;  and  which  guard  will  be  relieved  every  fortnight.^ 

The  Court  decided  that  between  now  and  Monday  next  it 
will  make  arrangements  for  this  expedition,  since  it  is  very  expe- 
dient to  undertake  it. 

Pierre  Gagnon  produced  in  Court  the  account  of  the  pay- 
ments, which  he  had  made  to  the  creditors  of  the  late  Bellau  after 
the  auction,  which  he  caused  to  be  held;  and  it  was  approved. 

A  petition  addressed  to  the  magistrates  against  Ignace  Chati- 
gny  that  an  examination  be  made  to  see  if  he  is  guilty  or  not  of 
that  of  which  he  has  been  accused. 

The  Court  postponed  the  present  examination  till  Sunday,  the 
ninth  of  the  current  month,  since  there  are  two  magistrates  lacking. 

Augustin  Angers  became  bondsman  for  the  person  of  Ignace 
Chatigny  until  the  day  he  was  to  be  interrogated. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  9th  of  the  current  month. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  DuCharme,  President. 

At  a  Court,  July  25. 
President,  M.  Charles  DuCharme. 
Ant.  Harmand.  Clement  Langlois. 

Francois  Courier.  Philippe  Gervais. 

The  Court  assembled  to  make  arrangements  to  settle  the 
affairs  of  the  late  John  Conn;   and  named  Francois  Saucier  to 

17th,  and  was  repelled  by  the  French  themselves. — Dodge  to  Jefferson,  August  i,  Va.  State 
Papers,  i.,  368. 


6o  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

pour  payer  Les  Comptes  Et  Billet  quil  [sic]  Luy  Seront  prdsente 
Et  prendra  Le  Serment  de  chaque  personne  Sur  Leur  Compte 
et  aprds  rendera  Compte  Exacte  du  tous  Les  payement  quil  aura 
fait  Sur  Le  produit  de  Lancan   Montant  a  la  Somme  de  1013^^ 

15- 

f  saucier  Gref^  DuCharme  presd 

a  une  Cour  du  14  aous*  1780. 
President,  Ch^  Ducharme         philipe  Jervais 
ant.  armant  J""  B*®  Lacroix 

fr.  Courri^  Joseph  Lepage 

Clement  Langlois  Pres* 

fr.  Saucier  a  produit  un  billet  de  M^  Charle  Gratiot  de  La 
Somme  de  Cinq  Mil  neuf  Cent  Soixante  Et  onze  Livres  En  pel- 
leterie  passe  a  L'ordre  de  M^  Ch^^  Sanguinette,  et  a  demende  que 
Le  dit  Sieur  Gratiot  soit  Condanne  a  paye  Son  Billet. 

L'a  [sic]  Cour  a  Condanne  M^  Gratiot  a  payer  Son  d*  Billet 
Sans  delay  Sauf  a  prendre  des  arengement  Ensemble  Si  M^ 
Sanguinette  Le  juge  a  propos. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  Jeudy  17  aoust  1780. 
fr  saucier.  DuCharme  presd 

a  une  Cour  du  16  aoust  1780. 
President  Ch^^  ducharme  philipe  Jervais 

ant.  armant  J"   B*®   Lacroix 

Clement  Lenglois 

Presen 
L'a  [sic]  Cour  ayant  fait  assemble  tous  Les  Cap*  de  milice  Et 
autres  principaux  habitant  de  Ce  Village  pour  Decider  Ensemble 
et  prendre  Les  moyens  Les  plus  Sur  pour  Eviter  toutes  Surprises 
de  la  par  de  Leurs  Ennemis  ont  Decide  qu'il  Seroit  absolument 
necessaire  de  faire  partir  Dici  Dix  homme  choisi  pour  aller  faire 
une  Decouverte  Dans  La  rivierre  Des  Illinois  pour  tacher  de  re- 
connoitre Si  positivement  L'arme  angloise  Dont  nous  Somme 
menace  Est  en  marche  pour  venir  Et  quetant  arive  aux  pe  il 
Detacheront  quelques  pour  venir  nous  informe  de  Ce  qui  Si  passe 
Et  poursuivront  Leur  route  plus  loin  Jusqu'a  Ce  quils  ayn  [sic] 
Des  nouvelles  Sartains  de  L'arme. 


COURT  RECORD,  AUGUST,  1780  '   61 

pay  the  accounts  and  notes,  which  will  be  presented  to  him,  and 
he  shall  receive  the  oath  of  each  person  in  regard  to  his  account ; 
and  afterwards  he  shall  render  exact  account  of  all  payments 
which  he  shall  have  made  from  the  proceeds  of  the  auction,  which 
amount  to  the  sum  of  1013  livres  15  sols. 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  DuCharme,  President. 

At  a  Court,  August  14,  1780. 

President  Ch.  DuCharme.         Philippe  Gervais. 

Ant.  Harmand.  Jean  Bte  LaCroix. 

Fr.  Courier.  Joseph  Lepage. 

Clement  Langlois.  Present. 

Fr.  Saucier  produced  a  note  of  M.  Charles  Gratiot  for  the  sum 
of  five  thousand  nine  hundred  and  seventy-one  livres  in  peltries 
drawn  to  the  order  of  M.  Ch.  Sanguinette,  and  prayed  that  the 
said  M.  Gratiot  be  condemned  to  pay  his  note. 

The  Court  condemned  M.  Gratiot  to  pay  the  said  note  with- 
out delay,  reserving  the  right  to  the  two  to  make  arrangements, 
if  M.  Sanguinette  judges  it  expedient. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  August  17,  1780. 

F.  Saucier.  DuCharme,  President. 

At  a  Court,  August  16,  1780. 

President  Ch.  DuCharme.         Philippe  Gervais. 

Ant.  Harmand.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix. 

Clement  Langlois.  Present. 

The  Court  caused  all  the  captains  of  the  militia  and  other 
principal  inhabitants  of  the  village  to  assemble  in  order  to  decide 
upon  and  take  the  surest  means  to  avoid  any  surprise  by  their 
enemies ;  ^  and  they  decided  that  it  would  be  absolutely  necessary 
to  send  from  here  ten  chosen  men  for  the  purpose  of  reconnoitering 
on  the  Illinois  River  in  order  to  endeavor  to  find  out  positively 
if  the  English  army,  by  which  we  are  menaced,  is  on  the  march; 
and  that,  when  they  have  arrived  at  Peoria,  they  shall  detach 
some  men  to  come  and  inform  us  what  is  taking  place;  and 
that  the  rest  shall  pursue  their  route  farther,  until  they  have 
certain  news  of  the  army. 

1  See  p.  58,  n.  i.,  539  note. 


62  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Et  pour  Cette  Effest  il  a  Etdt  [sic]  Decide  D'un  plain  accord 
que  Chaques  habitant  tiendra  ches  Luy  Les  vivres  necessaire  pour 
Luy  et  Les  Soldat  quil  aura  ches  Luy  pour  quinze  jour  affin  d'etre 
en  Etat  de  partir  au  meme  moment  que  Les  d^couvreur  nous 
auront  Donne  Des  nouvelle  de  nos  Ennemis,  Desirant  tous  En- 
semble aller  au  devant  plutot  que  de  Se  Lesser  attaquer  Et  Meme 
Les  Lesser  trop  aprocher  Les  village  prevoyant  La  perte  Du  pays . 
Si  il  Les  y  Lesse  arrive  En  Consequence  toute  Lassemble  Espere 
que  par  Le  Secour  unanime  Des  Deux  rive  il  Seront  a  meme 
daretter  par  Ce  moyens  tous  Les  projest  De  Leurs  Ennemis, 

Et  pour  n'etre  pas  Embarasse  pour  Les  Voiture  il  a  Ete  decide 
et  accorde  que  toute  Les  voiture  qui  Sont  Dans  Ce  village  Seront 
toutes  arrette  et  mis  en  garde,  Jusqua  ce  que  L'on  Soit  Sur  de  n'en 
avoir  point  de  Besoin. 

La  Cour  et  toute  Lassemble  ont  Ete  Daccord  quil  Seroit  a 
propos  de  prier  Le  Major  William  de  Sinteresser  pour  pouvoir 
avoir  autant  de  monde  quil  Seroit  possible  d'avoir  Des  Cas.  moy- 
enant  quil  Se  fournisse  Les  vivres  et  Les  voiture  necessaire  pour 
Se  Joindre  au  Jens  de  ce  village  pour  Lexpedicion  vue  que  Cest 
Le  bien  de  tout  Le  pays  et  qua  Cette  Effest  il  Leur  Sera  Danne  de 
pareils  ordres  pour  Etre  pret  a  partir  Sitot  Les  nouvelle  de  nos 
Decouvreur  recue. 

Et  pour  Cette  Effest  il  Sera  donn^  Des  ordres  pour  que  toute 
Les  chauses  necessaire  pour  Lexpedition  Seront  pret  Dici  a  huit 
Jour  Sous  peine  De  punition. —  aux  Cahos  Le  i6  aoust  1780. 
f  trotier.  DuCharme  presd 

fr  saucier  Grefl&er 
a  une  Cour  du  25  aoust  1780. 
President  Ch.  Ducharme  ph.  Jervais 

J"  Bte  LaCroix  Jp^  Lapage 

fr.  Courrier  Prdsen 

Demendeur  Louis  trotier  Defendeur  ant  armant 

Le  Demendeur  poursuit  Le  defendeur  pour  trois  Cent  Livres 
de  farine  pour  une  paire  de  roux  quil  Luy  a  fait. 

Le  defendeur  Dit  quil  Etoit  Convenu  de  Luy  donner  ou 

1  Very  little  is  known  of  John  Williams,  except  the  very  active  part  be  took  in  the  cam- 
paigns in  Illinois. —  English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  Index.    He  was  in  command  at 


COURT  RECORD,  AUGUST,  1780  63 

And  for  this  purpose  it  was  decided  unanimously  that  each 
inhabitant  shall  keep  at  his  house  provisions  necessary  for  himself 
and  the  soldiers,  whom  he  shall  have  with  him,  for  a  fortnight, 
so  as  to  be  ready  to  start  at  a  minute's  notice,  when  the  reconnoitr- 
ing party  gives  news  of  our  enemies,  since  all  desire  to  go  to  meet 
the  enemy  rather  than  allow  them  to  make  the  attack  or  even  to 
approach  too  near  the  village,  in  view  of  the  loss  to  the  country, 
if  they  are  allowed  to  reach  it.  Accordingly  the  whole  assembly 
hopes  that  by  the  unanimous  succour  of  both  bank  they  will  be 
be  able  by  this  means  to  thwart  the  plans  of  their  enemies. 

And  in  order  not  to  be  embarrassed  by  want  of  boats,  it  was 
decided  that  all  the  boats  in  this  village  shall  be  secured  and 
guarded  until  it  is  certain  that  there  is  no  need  of  them. 

The  Court  and  the  whole  assembly  have  agreed  that  it  would  be 
expedient  to  ask  Major  Williams  ^  to  interest  himself  in  obtaining 
as  large  a  force  as  possible  from  Kaskaskia,  on  condition  that 
they  furnish  themselves  with  the  provisions  and  boats  necessary 
to  join  the  people  of  the  village  on  the  expedition,  since  it  is  for 
the  good  of  the  whole  coilntry;  and  that  for  this  purpose  he 
shall  give  them  similar  orders  to  be  ready  to  set  out  as  soon  as 
news  from  the  reconnoitring  party  is  received. 

And  for  this  purpose  there  shall  be  given  orders  so  that  every- 
thing shall  be  ready  within  a  week,  underjpenalty  of  punishment . 
At  Cahokia,  August  16,  1780. 

F.  Trottier.  DuCharme,  President. 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk. 

At  a  Court,  August  25,  1780. 
President,  Ch.  DuCharme.  Phil.  Gervais. 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.  Jos.  Lepage. 

Fr.  Courier.  Present.  ' 

Louis  Trottier,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Ant.  Harmand,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  three  hundred  pounds  of 
flour  due  for  a  pair  of  wheels,  which  he  had  made  for  him. 

Cahokia  at  this  time,  having  superseded  McCarty,  after  Colonel  Montgomery  returned  from 
the  Rock  river  expedition. — McCarty's  letter  to  Clark  in  this  volume,  p.  620  and  also  p.  543f 
note  7, 


64  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

pelleterie  ou  farine  mais  que  Ce  trouvant  Cour  de  farine  il  offre 
Soixante  Livres  En  pelleterie  au  demendeur  pour  Ses  roux. 

Le  demendeur  dit  que  Le  defendeur  Luy  a  offert  de  La  pel- 
leterie mais  quil  Luy  avoit  dit  que  Ce  n'etoit  point  de  La  pel- 
leterie quil  Luy  devoit  que  Cetoit  de  La  farine. 

M'"  an*  armant  a  produit  La  personne  de  George  hait  pour 
temoins  qui  apr^s  avoir  prete  Serment  a  dit  quil  Etoit  present 
Lorsque  M^^  armant  Et  trottier  ont  fait  marchd  pour  une  p^  de 
roux  Et  que  M^  armant  Luy  a  dit  quil  n'avoit  point  de  farine 
a  Luy  donner  avant  Les  recolte  mais  quapres  Les  recolte  il  Luy 
En  donneroit  ou  Soixante  Livres  en  pelleterie. 

La  Cour  a  decide  que  Les  deux  partie  Setant  offert  a  donner 
Chaq'un  Leur  Serment,  que  le  defendeur  payeroit  au  demendeur 
La  moitie  En  farine  Et  Lautre  moitie  en  pelleterie.  Et  payeroit 
Chaq'un  Leur  part  des  fraix. 

francois  saucier  a  portd  plainte  Centre  Ignace  Chatignie  pour 
une  insulte  quil  a  fait  a  La  Cour.  ayant  dit  que  tout  Les  majistrat 
Etoit  tous  Des  Bette. 

Ignac  chatignie  ayant  Paru  a  dit  quil  Etoit  vray  quil  Lavoit 
dit  mais  quil  ne  Croyoit  pas  que  cela  Seroit  repetd. 

La  Cour  a  decider  que  pour  Linsulte  qui  a  Ete  fait  par  led* 
Ignace  Chatignie  a  la  Cour  quelle  Saddressera  a  M^  trotier 
Command*  au  dit  Lieu  de  Le  faire  mettre  En  prison  huit  Jour 
et  payera  Cinquante  Livres  D'amende  pour  Leglise  Et  Les  fraix. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourn^  a  Jeudi  7  de  Septembre. 

f  saucier  Greffier  DuCharme  presd 

a  une  Cour  du  14^  Septembre  1780. 
President  Ch^®  Ducharme  clem*   Langlois 

jn  gte  Lacroix  ph^^  Jervais 

J^  Lepage  ant.  armant 

fr.  Courier  present 

ALEXIS  Brison  Demendeur    AUG*,  ange  Defendeur 

Le  Demendeur  poursuit  Le  Defendeur  pour  Luy  avoir  fait 
reproche  d'avoir  Ete  La  Cause  de  La  mort  du  nome  Dubois, 

1  Proof  by  oath  was  a  survival  from  the  primitive  German  law,  and  was  modified  by  the 
influence  of  the  canon  law  during  the  Middle  Ages.  This  method  of  reaching  a  decision  was 
resorted  to  only  in  case  of  lack  of  sufi&cient  proof  by  witnesses.  The  procedure  was  not  wath- 
out  formalities.     It  was  decided  by  agreement  between  the  parties  which  of  the  two  should 


COURT  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1780  65 

The  defendant  says  that  he  had  agreed  to  pay  him  either  peltries 
or  flour,  but  finding  himself  short  of  flour  offers  sixty  livres  in 
peltries  to  the  plaintiff  for  his  wheels. 

The  plaintiff  says  that  the  defendant  offered  peltries,  but  he 
had  said  that  it  was  not  peltries  that  the  latter  owed,  but  flour. 

M.  Ant.  Harmand  produced  the  person  of  George  Hait  as 
witness,  who,  after  making  oath,  said  that  he  was  present  when 
MM.  Harmand  and  Trottier  made  a  bargain  for  a  pair  of  wheels 
and  that  M.  Harmand  told  the  plaintiff  that  he  had  no  flour  to 
give  before  the  harvest,  but  that  after  the  harvest  he  would  give 
him  flour  or  sixty  livres  in  peltries. 

The  Court  decided  that,  since  each  party  offered  to  give  the  other 
his  oath,^  the  defendant  should  pay  the  plaintiff  half  in  flour  and 
half  in  peltries,  and  that  each  should  pay  his  part  of  the  costs. 

Frangois  Saucier  brought  complaint  against  Ignace  Chatigny 
for  an  insult  which  he  had  offered  to  the  Court,  having  said  that 
all  the  magistrates  were  fools. 

Ignace  Chatigny  appeared  and  said  that  it  was  true  that  he 
had  said  it,  but  he  had  not  thought  it  would  be  repeated. 

The  Court  decided  that  on  account  of  the  insult,  which  had 
been  offered  it  by  the  said  Ignace  Chatigny,  it  will  make  appli- 
cation to  M.  Trottier,  commandant  in  said  place,  to  have  him 
put  in  prison  for  a  week;  and  that  he  shall  pay  fifty  livres  fine 
to  the  church  and  the  costs. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  September    7. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  DuCharme,  President. 

At  a  Court,  September  14,  1780. 
President,  Ch.  DuCharme.  Clem.  Langlois. 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.  Phil.  Gervais. 

Jos.  Lepage.  Ant.  Harmand. 

Fr.  Courier.  Present. 

Alexis  Brisson,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Aug.  Angers,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  having  reproached  him  with 
being  the  cause  of  the  death  of  the  named   Dubois    and  prays 

confirm  his  statement  by  oath.  In  the  above  case  both  parties  appeared  equally  ready  to  make 
oath,  and  so  the  judges  made  a  compromise.  The  procedure  is  illustrated  by  other  examples 
in  this  volume. — Glasson,  Hist,  du  droit  et  des  institttiions  de  la  Franct,  vi.,  563. 


66  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Et  demande  a  La  Cour  que  Le  Defendeur  Luy  prouve  Se  Dont 
il  Lacuse  avoir  fait. 

Le  defendeur  Declare  quil  est  Vray  quil  a  dit  au  Demendeur 
ayant  Eu  dificultd  avec  Luy  Jusqua  moment  de  ce  fraper,  quil 
en  avoit  fait  perir  un  Et  quil  ne  Le  feray  pas  perir  Luy,  et  quil 
est  bien  Vray  quavant  La  dificulte  que  Le  d*  Dubois  a  Eu  avec 
Le  Demendeur  quil  Se  portoit  Bien  et  que  Depuis  Ce  tems  il 
Sest  mis  au  Lit  Et  n'en  est  point  releve  et  cela  a  la  Connoissance 
de  tout  Le  monde. 

pierre  Gatient  ayant  paru  a  prete  Sermant  Sur  Le  S*.  Evan- 
gille  de  dieu  tout  puissant  de  dire  La  Veritte  Et  a  dit  que  il  vray 
que  Dubois  Luy  a  dit  que  Brisson  Luy  avoit  Donne  une  tape  et 
quil  ne  Lavoit  Jamais  frape  avec  Son  fusil,  et  qu'en  outre  il  n' 
avoit  jamais  Envoyer  chercher  fr  saucier  pour  Luy  Dire  tout  ce 
quil  a  depos^  a  la  Cour  de  Sa  part. 

fr.  saucier  a  prete  Serment  Sur  Le  Saint  Evangile  de  dieu  tout 
puissant  Et  a  dit  quil  a  Ete  Envoye  Cherche  par  m'"  Lionay  et 
m'"  Longval  Et  quayant  ete  ches  Led*  Dubois  quil  Luy  auroit 
Dit  que  M^  Brisson  ayant  Ete  ches  Luy  et  quil  L'avoit  frap^ 
Luy  avoit  Casse  Son  fusil  et  Luy  a  donne  un  Coup  de  pied  dans 
Le  Cote  et  quil  avoit  crache  Le  Sang  du  Coup. 

M^  Lionay  ayant  paru  a  prete  Serment  Sur  Le  S*  Evangille 
de  dieu  tout  puissant  et  a  dit  quil  a  Ete  envoye  de  La  part  de  feu 
dubois  chercher  m^  Saucier  pour  Luy  Conter  La  dificultd  quil 
avoit  Eu  avec  Brisson  Et  quil  Luy  a  Dit  que  Brisson  Lavoit 
Battu  et  quil  Croyoit  quil  n'en  reviendray  pas. 

La  Cour  a  decider  que  Suivant  Les  Deposition  qui  ont 
Ete  fait  Contre  Le  Dit  Demendeur  quil  Sera  pris  et  arrete 
et  Mis  En  prison  pour  que  Sous  huit  Jour  il  aye  a  donner 
Des  preuve  plus  grande  du  Contraire  de  ce  dont  il  Est  taxd. 
faute  de  quoy  il  Sera  fait  une  Semble  de  Jure  pour  Decider  Son 
affaire. 

une  Lettre  adresse  en  Cour  par  M^  Ducharme  Signe  ch 
Gratiot  qui  demende  que  La  Cour  ne  termine  aucune  affaire 
Contre  Luy  avant  Son  retour. 

fr  Saucier  porteur  D'un  de  Ses  Billet  a  demender  a  la  Cour 


COURT  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1780  67 

the  Court  that  the  defendant  prove  that  which  he  accuses  him  of 
having  done. 

The  defendant  declares  that  it  is  true  that  he  said  to  the 
plaintiff,  at  a  time  when  he  had  a  quarrel  with  him  up  to  the  point 
of  coming  to  blows,  that  he  had  made  one  die  and  that  he  wasn't 
going  to  make  him.  He  further  said  that  it  is  true  that  before 
the  quarrel,  which  the  said  Dubois  had  had  with  the  plaintiff, 
the  former  was  in  good  health  and  that  after  that  time  he  went 
to  bed  and  never  got  up  again  and  every  one  knew  that. 

Pierre  Gatient  having  appeared  made  oath  on  the  Holy- 
Gospels  of  Almighty  God  to  tell  the  truth  and  said  that  it  is  true 
that  Dubois  told  him  that  Brisson  had  given  him  a  rap  and  that 
he  had  not  struck  him  with  his  gun;  and  furthermore  he  had 
never  summoned  Fr.  Saucier  to  tell  him  what  the  latter  had 
deposed  in  the  Court  on  his  account. 

Fr.  Saucier  made  oath  on  the  Holy  Gospels  of  Almighty  God 
and  said  that  he  had  been  summoned  by  M.  Lionet  and  M. 
Lonval  and  that,  when  he  was  at  the  house  of  the  said  Dubois, 
the  latter  told  him  that  M.  Brisson  had  been  at  his  house  and  had 
struck  him,  had  broken  his  gun  on  him  and  given  him  a  kick  in 
the  side  and  that  he  had  spit  blood  on  account  of  the  blow. 

M.  Lionet  having  appeared  made  oath  on  the  Holy  Gospels 
of  Almighty  God  and  said  that  he  was  sent  by  the  late  Dubois 
to  summon  M.  Saucier  so  that  he  might  tell  him  about  the  quarrel, 
which  he  had  had  with  Brisson ;  and  that  he  told  M.  Saucier  that 
Brisson  had  beaten  him  and  he  feared  that  he  would  not  recover. 

The  Court  decided  that,  on  account  of  the  depositions  which 
have  been  made  against  the  said  plantiff,  he  shall  be  appre- 
hended, arrested  and  put  in  prison  in  order  that  within  a  week 
he  should  give  greater  proofs  to  the  contrary  of  that  with  which 
he  has  been  accused,  in  default  of  which  there  shall  be  held  a 
meeting  of  jurors  to  decide  his  case. 

A  letter  presented  to  the  Court  by  M.  DuCharme  and  signed 
by  Ch.  Qratiot  who  requests  the  Court  not  to  terminate  any  cause 
against  him  before  his  return. 

Fr.  Saucier  bearer  of  one  of  his  notes  prayed  the  Court  for  a 


68  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

une  Saisi  provisionaire  Sur  tous  Les  Bien  dud*  Sieur    Gratiot. 
Si  il  nest  pas  de  retour  dans  Dix  Jour  de  Cette  datte. 

La  Cour  a  accorde  a  fr.  Saucier  appres  Les  dix  Jour  Expire 
La  saisie  provisionaire  Suivant  sa  Demande. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  Jeudi  21  du  cou^*. 
fr  saucier  Greffie.  DuCharme  presd. 

a  une  Cour  tenue  Le  21  Septembre  1780. 
president.  Ch^^  Ducharme  fr.  Courier 

J^  B*^  Lacroix  Clet  Langlois 

ant.  armant  present 

Demendeur  S^  ortis  Defendeur  S^  Henson 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  Des  avances 
quil  Luy  a  fait  Suivant  Ses  obligation  et  Billet. 

Le  Deffendre  repond  par  une  Lettre  adresse  a  la  Cour  que 
vue  La  Situation  du  terns  il  Demande  pour  dellay  de  Suspendre 
L'execution  Jusqua  Noel  prochain  au  defaut  de  quoy  il  Sofre  a 
Sexe cuter  Luy  meme  a  Ce  tems  pour  tout  Dellay. 

II  a  Ete  Decide  et  accorde  par  La  Cour  que  M''  Henson 
Donnera  un  bon  et  Suiissant  Cotion  a  M^  ortis  pour  Ce  quil 
Luy  doit  et  aura  un  terme  dici  a  Noel  prochain  pour  tous  Dellay 
a  payer  ce  quil  Luy  doit  Et  a  payer  Les  fraix  Montant  a  douze 
Livres  Dix  Sols. 

Demendeur  ant  armant  Deffendeur  Joseph  relle 

Le  Demendeur  pousuit  Le  Deffendeur  pour  un  Billet  Con- 
senti  par  Luy,  a  L'ordre  de  Baptiste  Bellan  et  Dont  il  Est  Charge 
etant  passe  a  Son  ordre. 

Le  deffendeur  produit  un  Billet  par  Lequelle  Led*  bellan  prie 
M^  Sanfafon  de  remettre  a  Joseph  relle  Le  Billet  Dont  il  etoit 
Chargd. 

La  Cour  ne  pouvant  pas  Condanner  Led*  Joseph  relle  a 
payer  Led*  Billet  a  Condanner  Le  demendeur  a  rendre  au  De- 
fendeur Son  Billet  montant  a  la  Somme  de  Soixante  Livres  en 
pelleterie,  et  a  garder  Le  billet  que  bellant  Luy  ecrit  pour  avoir 
Son  recours  Sur  Luy  Comme  Le  dit  billet  Etoit  passe  a  Son 
ordre  et  Le  Demandeur  a  payer  Douze  Livres  Dix  Sols  pour 
fraix. 


COURT  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1780  69 

provisional  attachment  on  all  the  goods  of  the  said  M.  Gratiot, 
if  he  has  not  returned  within  ten  days  from  this  date. 

The  Court  granted  Fr.  Saucier  the  provisional  attachment 
after  the  expiration  of  ten  days,  in  accordance  with  his  prayer. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  the  2  ist  of  the  current  month. 
Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  DuCharme,  President. 

At  a  Court  held  September  21,  1780. 
President,  Ch.  DuCharme.      Fr.  Courier. 
Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.  Clem.  Langlois. 

Ant.  Harmand.  Present. 

M.  Ortis,  Plaintiff,  vs.  M.  Henson,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  advances,  which  he 
made  him,  according  to  his  obligation  and  note. 

The  defendant  answers  by  a  letter  addressed  to  the  Court  that 
in  view  of  the  conditions  of  the  times  he  prays  for  a  stay  of  execu- 
tion till  next  Christmas  and  in  default  of  payment  at  that  time 
he  offers  to  sell  his  property  himself  without  further  delay. 

It  was  decided  and  granted  by  the  Court  that  M.  Henson  shall 
give  good  and  sufficient  surety  to  M.  Ortis  for  what  he  owes  him 
and  he  shall  have  the  term  till  Christmas  and  no  longer  in  which 
to  pay  what  he  owes;  and  he  is  to  pay  the  costs  amounting  to 
twelve  livres  ten  sols. 

Ant.  Harmand,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Joseph  Relle,  Defendant. 

The  Plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  on  a  note  made  by  him  to  the 
order  of  Baptiste  Bellan  and  with  which  the  plaintiff  is  charged, 
as  it  has  been  assigned  to  his  order. 

The  defendant  produces  a  letter  in  which  the  said  Bellan 
begs  M.  Sansfajon  to  return  to  Joseph  Relle  the  note  with  which 
he  was  charged. 

The  Court,  not  being  able  to  condemn  the  said  Joseph  Relle 
to  pay  the  said  note,  condemned  the  plaintiff  to  return  to  the 
defendant  his  note,  which  amounts  to  the  sum  of  sixty  livres  in 
peltries,  and  to  keep  the  letter  which  Bellan  wrote  him  in  order 
to  have  recourse  against  the  same,  since  the  said  note  was  assigned 
to  his  order.  The  Court  condemned  the  plaintiff  to  pay  twelve 
livres  ten  sols  for  costs. 


70  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

Demendeur  M'^  levasseur  Deffendeur  prenouvaux 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  un  Difficulte 
Entre  Eux  a  Legar  d'un  Echange  D'un  Canon  de  fusil  quil 
Changoit  avec  Le  deffendeur  moyenant  Cinq  Livres  En  pelleterie 
de  retour  pour  Le  Canon  et  quinze  Livres  pour  Le  remonter, 
mais  Comme  Le  deffendeur  Se  refuse  a  Luy  remettre  Les  Cinq 
Livres  quil  Etoit  Convenu  pour  L' echange  il  Luy  a  rendu  Son 
canon  de  fusil  et  demende  que  Le  deffendeur  Luy  paye  La 
monture  quil  avoit  fait  a  Son  fusil  ne  pouvant  pas  Servire  a 
I'autre. 

Le  deffendeur  dit  quil  Etoit  Convenu  de  donner  au,  demendeur 
une  Ecus  de  retour  Seulement. 

Les  deux  partie  Setant  offert  Lun  et  Lautre  de  preter  Serment, 
et  nayant  aucun  temoin  La  Cour  Les  a  renvoye  a  payer  La 
moitie  chac'un  Des  fraix.  et  Le  Demendeur  a  perdre  La  moitie 
de  Ce  quil  demande  pour  La  monture  du  fusil. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  Jeudy  5  8^^^. 

DuCharme  presd* 

La  Cour  Etant  Encore  assemble,  et  a  pris  Le  Serment  des 
Douze  Jurd  qui  ont  Ete  nome  Comme  il  a  Ete  accorde  a  une 
Cour^  du  14^  du  present  pour  Juger  Laffaire  Entre  Brison  et 
ange  et  ont  a  Linstant  demende  que  Les  declaration  fait  a  ce 
Sujet  Leur  Soit  Lue  Ce  quau  meme  moment  a  Ete  fait  et  ont 
appres  Le  tout  Bien  Examiner;  que  par  La  Declaration  faitte 
Sous  Serment  par  pierre  Gatien  qui  prouve  Le  Contraire  de  La 
Denonciation  de  dubois  Luy  meme  Et  faitte  a  D'autre  pareille- 
ment^  et  nayant  aucune  preuve  du  Contraire  nous  Soussigne 
Jure  En  vertu  de  Lordre  qui  nous  a  Ete  Donne  par  La  Cour  de 
Decider  Laffaire  de  Brisson  et  D'enge  nous  n'avons  trouve  auqu'ne 
preuve  Suffisante  pour  Condanner  Led^  Brisson  a  auqu'ne 
Chose  que  se  Soit  Et  que  La  Cour  Condannera  qui  elle  Jugera 
a  propos  aux  frais  Depends  &c.  aux  Cahos  Le  21^®  7  bre 
1780. 

1  The  clause  "£<  faitte  a  D' attire  pareillement"  was  not  originally  written  by  the  clerk 
that  way.  The  "S"  is  an  insertion  and  a.iter  ''  pareillement"  a  contraire  was  inserted  and  then 
crossed  out. 

2  As  far  as  is  known,  this  was  the  first  jury  trial  in  lUinois  or  the  Northwest,  certainly  the 
first  recorded  one.   The  system  of  trial  by  jury  was  not  introduced  by  the  British  government, 


COURT  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1780  71 

M.  Levasseur,  plaintiff,  vs.  Prenouvaux,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  on  account  of  a  difficulty 
between  them  in  regard  to  an  exchange  of  a  gun  barrel,  which  he 
changed  with  the  defendant  in  consideration  of  five  livres  in 
peltries  to  boot  for  the  barrel  and  fifteen  livres  for  making  a  stock 
for  it;  but  since  the  defendant  refused  to  pay  him  the  .five  livres 
to  which  he  agreed  for  the  exchange,  he  had  returned  his  gun 
barrel  and  demands  that  the  defendant  pay  him  for  the  stock, 
which  he  had  made  for  the  barrel,  because  he  is  not  able  to  use  it 
on  another. 

The  defendant  says  that  he  agreed  to  give  the  plaintiff  only  one 
ecu  to  boot. 

Since  both  parties  offered  to  take  oath  and  they  had  no  wit- 
nesses, the  Court  dismissed  themj  ordering  each  to  pay  half  the 
costs  and  the  plaintiff  to  lose  half  of  what  he  demands  for  the  gun 
stock. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  October  5. 

DuCharme,  Pres. 

The  Court  being  still  assembled  received  the  oath  of  the  twelve 
jurors,  who  were  named  in  accordance  with  the  order  of  the 
Court  of  the  14th  of  the  present  month,  to  judge  the  case  between 
Brisson  and  Angers.  And  they  now  demanded  that  the  declara- 
tions, which  were  made,  be  read  to  them,  and  this  was  immediately 
done.  After  a  careful  examination  they  decided  that  the  affi- 
davit of  Pierre  Gatient  made  under  oath  proves  the  contrary  of 
the  accusation  of  Dubois  himself  which  was  made  to  others  also ;  ^ 
and  since  there  is  no  other  proof  to  the  contrary,  they  return  this 
verdict:  "We  the  undersigned  jurors,  in  virtue  of  the  order 
given  us  by  the  Court  to  decide  the  cause  of  Brisson  and  Angers, 
have  not  found  any  proof  sufficient  to  condemn  the  said  Brisson 
on  any  count  whatsoever;  and  recommend  that  the  Court  con- 
demn whomever  it  judges  proper  to  pay  the  costs  etc."  ^ 
At  Cahokia,  September  21,  1780. 

as  has  been  frequently  said. — Kas  Rec,  Edict  of  Colonel  Wilkins.  In  this  edict  Wilkins  gave 
the  court  of  judicature,  established  by  him  in  1768,  jurisdiction  in  criminal  matters,  but  he 
said  that  the  people  were  not  sufficiently  familiar  with  English  law  to  permit  trials  by  jury.  The 
use  of  trial  by  jury  in  the  courts  of  the  county  of  Illinois  was  due  to  the  influence  of  the  Vir- 
ginians.— Introducticm,  p.  Ixiii. 


72 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 


[Signed.] 
Sa 
Chie  +  Butau 
marque 
sa 
B*^  +  Lussier 
marque 
sa 
fr  +  prenouvaux. 
marque 

sa 
B*«  +  Baron 
marque 
2i^e_  ybre  jy3o. 


Sa 
Ch  Pierre  +  Gramon 

marque 
sa 
G.  Blin  rapi  +  Gagn^ 

marque 
sa 
B.  Saucier      f.  +  cretien 
marque 
sa 
Louis  +  chatel 
marque 
La  Cour  Setant  rassembld  pour  Examiner 


L'opinion  Des  Jur^  Si  Dessu  nom^  president  Ch^®  Ducharme, 
J°  B*^  Lacroix  Clement  Lenglois,  ant.  armant,  tous  quatre 
present  Et  ont  Condann^  et  Condanne  Le  S''  augustin  angd  aux 
fraix  qui  auront  Ete  fait,  &c  nayant  pas  produit  Sufisante  preuve 
Contre  L'ataque  quil  a  fait  a  alexis  Brisson. 

f  saucier  Greffier. 
a  une  Cour  du  15  8bre  1780. 
president  Ch^®  Ducharme  clement  Lenglois 

B*®  Lacroix  philipe  Jervais 

pres* 
a  La  demende  de  plusieurs  personne  de  ce  Village  pour  avoir 
Des  permis  pour  aller  ou  Leurs  petite  affaires  Les  appellent,  La 
Cour  Sest  assemble  pour  Ce  Sujete  et  a  decidd  quil  Sera  donn^ 
Des  permis  a  quelque  personne  d'une  reputation  et  Caractere 
reconnu  et  quil  Sera  Defendu  tres  Expressement  a  qui  que  Se  Soit 
D'importer  avec  eux  aucune  Boison  anivrente  Et  Donneront 
Cotion  qui  repondera  de  toute  malversation  de  Leur  par. 

pierre  Gatien  ayant  prete  Serment  Sur  LeS  Evangille  de  rien 
faire  ni  faire  auqu'ne  Chose  Contraire  aux  Etat  Et  a  Donn^  La 
personne  de  m^  fr  trotier  pour  Cotion  il  Luy  a  Et^  accord^ 
un  permis  pour  aller  Dans  Le  mississipy  ou  Ses  affaires  La- 
pellent. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourn^  Jeudy  19,  8^^^. 

fr  saucier  Gref  DuCharme  prd. 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1780 


73 


[Signed.] 

his 

Charles  +  Buteau. 

mark 

CH. 

his 
Pierre  +  Grandmont. 
mark 

his 
Bte.  +  Lussier. 
mark 

G.  Blin. 

his 

Raph.  +  Gagn^. 

mark 

his 
Fr.  +  Prenouvau. 
mark 

B.  Saucier. 

his 
F.  +  Chretien, 
mark 

his 
Bte.  +  Baron, 
mark 

his 

Louis  +  Chatel. 

mark 

September  21,  1780,  The  Court  reassembled  to  examine  the 
opinion  of  the  jurors  above  named,  President  Charles  DuCharme, 
Jean  Bte.  Lacroix,  Clement  Langlois,  Ant.  Harmand  all  four 
being  present;  and  has  condemned  and  does  condemn  M.  Augustin 
Angers  to  pay  the  costs  of  the  trial,  since  he  has  not  proved  his 
accusation  against  Alexis  Brisson. 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk. 

At  a  Court,  October  15,  1780. 
President,  Ch.  DuCharme.       Clement  Langlois. 
Bte  LaCroix  Philip  Gervais. 

Present. 
On  the  petition  of  several  persons  of  this  village  for  permission 
to  go  where  their  private  business  calls  them,  the  Court  assembled 
to  consider  this  subject,  and  decided  that  permission  shall  be  given 
to  some  persons  of  recognized  reputation  and  character,  and  that 
it  shall  be  very  expressly  forbidden  everybody  to  import  with  them 
any  intoxicating  liquor,  and  that  those  to  whom  permission  to  go 
is  given  shall  present  bondsmen  who  will  be  responsible  for  all 
misdemeanors  on  their  part. 

Pierre  Gatient  made  oath  on  the  Holy  Gospel  to  do  nothing  and 
to  cause  nothing  contrary  to  the  interests  of  the  State  and  presented 
the  person  of  M.  Fr.  Trottier  for  bondsman.     He  was  granted 
permission  to  go  on  the  Mississippi,  where  his  business  calls  him. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  October  19. 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  DuCharme,  Pres. 


74  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

26  S^'"^ 
President  J^  Lepage  ant.  armant 

J°  B*^  Lacroix  ph^^  Jervais 

clem*  Langlois  Present 

Pierre  Dorion  Demendeur  Ch^^  Ducharme  Deffendeur 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  defendeur  pour  avoir  Cotion^ 
pour  Le  nome  Joseph  Deloge  a  qui  il  a  Gagne  quartre  Cent 
Livre  au  Jeu  de  Carte  et  dit  navoir  Joue  avec  Luy  que  Sur  Les 
assurance  de  Son  argent  que  que  [sic]  Le  deffendeur  Luy  donnoit 
par  Son  Cotionnement. 

Le  deffendeur  declare  avoir  Servie  de  Cotion  a  Joseph  Deloge 
pour  Jusqu'a  La  Somme  de  quatre  Cent  Livres,  Mais  que  Le 
d*  Deloge  Luy  a  dit  quil  ne  Les  avoit  point  perdu. 

La  Cour  a  renvoye  Le  present  proves  pour  Etre  Decide  a  La 
Cour  prochaine  Et  Estre  Led*  Deloge  pourcuit  par  Le  Demen- 
deur avant  que  d'attaque  Le  Cotion  Deffendeur. 

B*®  Saucier  Demendeur  Jo^  Asselin  Deffendeur 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur,  pour  nayant  pas  pu  un 
Jour  aller  Livrer  de  la  chau  d'un  fournau  quils  avoient  fait  En 
Commun  Sans  auqu'un  marche  ni  Convention  que  Sur  Leur 
parole,  que  Le  Deffendeur  Luy  fait  paye  un  Compte  de  travau 
quil  a  fait  faire  au  fournau  apres  Etre  Cui  Sans  Le  prevenir  de 
Louvrage  quil  alloit  y  faire  faire. 

Le  Deffendeur  declare  avoir  Ete  une  fois  dire  au  demendeur 
d' aller  Livrer  de  La  chau  ne  pouvant  pas  cy  aller  Luy  meme. 

Le  Demendeur  repette  quil  a  dit  au  deffendeur  Cette  Journe 
La  que  Le  fournau  periray  plutant  que  de  quitter  Louvrage  quil 
avoit,  Et  quil  pouvoit  prendre  un  homme  Et  L'envoyer  a  Sa 
place  Et  Lui  Le  payeroit. 

La  Cour  a  Condanner  Le  deffendeur  a  Livrer  au  Demendeur 
La  moitie  du  fournau  Et  a  payer  tous  Deux  Les  fraix  qui  ont 
Ete  fait  pour  La  Conservation  de  Leur  fournau  Et  payeront 
Egalement  La  fraix  De  Justice. 

La  Cour  Est  adjourne  Jeudy  2^^  de  Qbre. 
fr  saucier  Grefffer  Jh  lepage  presidan 

1  The  popular  gambling  game  among  the  French  at  this  time  was  Vingt-et-un. 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1780  75 

October  26. 
President  J.  Lepage.  Ant.  Harmand. 

Jean  Bte  LaCroix.  Phil.  Gervais 

Clement  Langlois.  Present- 

Pierre  Dorion,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Ch.  DuCharme,  Defendant-. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  having  given  bond  for  the 
named  Joseph  Desloges,  from  whom  the  plaintiff  won  four  hundred 
livres  at  cards^  He  says  that  he  played  with  Desloges  only  because 
of  the  assurance  of  his  money  which  the  defendant  gave  by  his 
surety. 

The  defendant  declares  that  he  acted  as  bondsman  to  Joseph 
Desloges  up  to  the  sum  of  four  hundred  livres,  but  says  that  the 
said  Desloges  told  him  that  he  had  not  lost  that  amount. 

The  Court  continued  the  present  suit  to  be  decided  at  the  next 
Court  and  ordered  that  the  said  Desloges  be  sued  by  the  plaintiff 
before  suit  is  brought  on  the  surety  of  the  defendant. 

Bte.  Saucier  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jos,   Asselin,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  because  he  was  not  able  to 
go  one  day  and  draw  off  the  lime  from  a  kiln  which  they  had  made 
together  without  any  contract  or  agreement  except  their  word; 
and  he  says  that  the  defendant  made  him  pay  a  bill  for  work, 
which  he  had  ordered  done  on  the  kiln  after  it  was  fired,  without 
informing  the  plaintiff  of  the  work  he  intended  to  have  done  on  it. 

The  defendant  declares  that  he  went  one  time  to  tell  the 
plaintiff  to  go  and  draw  off  the  lime,  since  he  was  not  able  to  go 
himself. 

The  plaintiff  repeats  that  he  told  the  defendant  that  day  that 
the  kiln  might  go  to  ruin  before  he  would  leave  the  work  he  was 
doing;  and  that  he  could  get  a  man  to  send  in  his  place  and 
that  he  would  pay  him. 

The  Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  give  the  plaintiff  half 
the  kiln,  and  both  to  pay  the  expenses  which  had  been  made  for 
the  preservation  of  the  kiln,  and  to  pay  equally  the  costs  of  justice. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  November  2. 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  Jos.  Lepage,  President. 


76  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

a  une  Cour  du  i6  pbre 
President  Jos^  Lepage  ant.  armant 

Ch^®  Ducharme  fr.  Courrid 

p  B*®  Lacroix  Present 

Demendeur  Pierre  martin  Defendeur  Ch'"®  Lacroix 

Le  Demendeur  poursuit  Le  Deffendeur  pour  un  pour^eau  quil 
a  pris  Dans  La  prarie  Du  pon  Et  quil  a  renferme  Ches  Luy,  Et 
Demande  quil  Luy  Soit  rendu.    . 

Le  demendeur  dit  Encore  que  M'^  pierre  roy  a  dit  au  deffend- 
eur Lorsquil  a  pris  et  amener  Led*  pourjeau  Ches  Luy  quil  ne 
Luy  appartenoit  pas  quil  Etoit  au  demendeur  a  quoy  Led*  def- 
fendeur a  repondu  que  Celuy  quil  Le  reclameroit  Le  Viendroit 
Cherche. 

Le  Deffendeur  Dit  quil  Croyoit  Bien  Le  d*  pj^urpeau  a  Luy 
Lorsquil  a  pris  Et  que  Si  Le  Demendeur  Donne  Des  preuve  quil 
Soit  a  Luy  quil  Consent  a  Luy  rendre. 

Le  Demendeur  a  produit  Deux  temoins  qui  ont  fait  La  Visite 
au  dit  pour^eau  pierre  roy  et  Louis  Chatelle  ont  prete  Serment 
Sur  Le  Saint  Evangile  de  dieu  tout  puissant  de  repondre  au  ques- 
tion qu  on  Leur  feroit,  et  ont  Dit  qu'apres  avoir  Visite  Le  pour- 
feau  quils  ont  reconue  que  La  marque  Etoit  Celle  du  demendeur 
quoiquil  paroit  quil  aye  Ete  un  peu  Deguis^  Soit  par  la  gele  ou 
par  quelque  Branche  mais  que  malgre  cela  que  Leurs  opinion 
Est  quil  Croye  que  cest  La  marque  du  demendeur. 

La  Cour  a  D'un  plain  accorde  Condanne  Le  deffendeur  a 
rendre  au  demendeur  un  pareille  Cochon  Comme  Etoit  Celuy 
quil  Lui  a  pris  Sujet  a  Etre  visite  par  Celuy  quil  L'a  vue  Lors- 
quil a  Ete  prie  Et  a  payer  Les  fraix. 

Jean  B*^  Lacroix  Demande  a  la  Cour  quil  Luy  Soit  permis 
de  faire  vendre  quelques  Effest  appartenant  au  Sieur  Sills,  pour 
une  Somme  de  quatrevingt  et  quelque  Livres  quil  Luy  doit. 

La  Cour  a  permis  a  Mons^  Lacroix  La  vente  Des  dits  Effest 
dud*  Sills  dimanche  prochain. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourn^  Jeudy  7  x^^® 
f  saucier  Greffier  Jh  lepage  pre 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1780  77 

At  a  Court,  November  16. 
President,  Jos.  Lepage.  Ant.  Harmand. 

Ch.  DuCharme.  Fr.  Courier. 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.  Present. 

Pierre  Martin,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Ch.  LaCroix,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  a  pig,  which  he  had  taken 
in  the  Prairie  du  Pont  and  shut  up  at  his  house  and  demands  that 
it  be  returned  to  him. 

The  plaintiff  further  says  that  M.  Pierre  Roy  told  the  defend- 
ant at  the  time  he  captured  and  carried  the  pig  away  to  his 
house  that  it  didn't  belong  to  him  but  to  the  plaintiff,  to 
which  the  defendant  answered  that  he  who  claimed  it  might 
come  to  fetch  it. 

The  defendant  says  that  he  really  believed  the  said  pig  his, 
when  he  took  it;  but  if  the  plaintiff  gives  proof  that  it  belongs 
to  him,  he  would  consent  to  return  it. 

The  plaintiff  produced  two  witnesses,  who  have  inspected  the 
said  pig.  Pierre  Roy  and  Louis  Chatel  made  oath  on  the  Holy 
Gospels  of  Almighty  God  to  answer  the  question  which  was  put 
to  them;  and  said  that,  after  examining  the  pig,  they  recognized 
that  the  brand  was  that  of  the  plaintiff,  although  it  appeared  to 
have  been  somewhat  disguised  either  by  frost  or  some  branch, 
but  that  in  spite  of  that  their  opinion  is  that  it  is  the  brand  of  the 
plaintiff. 

The  Court  unanimously  condemned  the  defendant  to  return 
to  the  plaintiff  a  pig  similar  to  the  one  he  had  taken,  subject  to 
inspection  by  him,  who  saw  the  pig  when  it  was  taken,  and  to 
pay  the  costs. 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix  prays  the  Court  to  be  permitted  to  have 
sold  some  goods  belonging  to  M.  Sills  for  a  sum  of  eighty  odd 
livres  which  the  latter  owes  him. 

The  Court  permitted  M.  LaCroix  to  hold  the  sale  of  the  said 
goods  of  the  said  Sills  Sunday  next. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  December  7. 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  Jos.  Lepage,  Pres. 


78  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

a  une  Cour  du  23  9^^®  1780 
President  Jo  Lepage  Clem  Langlois 

Ch.  Ducharme  philipe  Jervais 

ant  armant  J"  B*^  Lacroix 

pres'^ 
un  Compte  presente  En  Cour  par  J^  B*^  Lacroix  de  Joseph 
matelot  Due  a  B*^  Lamarche  Et  Demande  que  Le  cheval  dud* 
matelot  Soit  vendu  pour  payer  une  Somme  de  Cent  Vingt  Deux 
Livre  que  Led*  Lamarche  Luy  doit  Et  a  renbourser  Le  Surplus 
Si  il  Est  Vendu  plus. 

La  Cour  a  accorde  a  J"  B*®  Lacroix  La  vente  du  Cheval  pour 
payer  Le  Compte  de  J^  B*^  Lamarche  et  autre  Si  il  Sen  trouve 
apres  toute  fois  que  J^  B*^  Lacroix  aura  tire  Soixante  Et  dix 
Livres  En  pelleterie  quil  a  paye  a  Pierre  S*  martin  pour  avoir 
amene  Led*  cheval  et  quarante  Livres  au  meme  pour  Led* 
Lamarche. 

un  autre  Compte  presente  par  J"  B*®  Lacroix  de  Samuel 
Silles  Montant  a  la  Somme  de  soixante  Et  dix  huit  Livres. 

Et  a  produit  aussi  La  vente  de  Ses  Effest  montant  a  la  Somme 
de  Cent  dix  livres  dix  sols.  La  Cour  a  acorde  a  J"  B*®  Lacroix 
soixante  Et  dix  huit  Livres  En  pelleterie,  Et  Le  [sic]  que  Le  reste 
Sera  Depose  Entre  Les  main  du  Cherif  pour  payer  Les  fraix  et 
autre  Creancier  Si  il  Sen  trouve. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  Jeudy  7  X^^^ 

a  une  Cour  19  X^^^  1780. 
President  Joseph  Lapage  ant  armant 

J^  B*®  Lacroix  philipe  Jervais 

pres* 
Demendeur  fr.  trotier        Defendeur  pierre  martin 
Le  Demendeur  poursuit  Le  Deffendeur  pour  un  Cheval  quil 
Luy  a  Change  pour  un  Boeuf  Et  que  Le  Deffendeur  refuse  de 
Luy  donner. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  Le  demendeur  Luy  avoit  promis 
de  Luy  donner  un  bon  Boeuf  tel  quil  Luy  avoit  demender  pour 
apareillie  un  Des  Sien. 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1780  79 

At  a  Court  November  23,  1780. 
President  Jos.  Lepage.  Clem.  Langlois. 

Ch.  DuCharme.  Philippe  Gervais. 

Ant.  Harmand.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix. 

Present. 
Jean  Bte.  Lacroix  presents  in  Court  an  account  of  Joseph 
Matelot  due  to  Bte.  Lamarche  and  demands  that  Matelot's  horse 
be  sold  to  pay  a  sum  of  one  hundred  and  twenty-two  livres,  which 
the  said  Lamarche  owes  him  and  that  the  surplus,  if  it  sells  for 
more,  be  returned. 

The  Court  granted  to  Jean  Bte.  Lacroix  the  sale  of  the  horse 
to  pay  the  account  of  Jean  Bte.  Lamarche  and  another  if  there 
is  any,  but  only  after  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix  shall  have  deducted 
seventy  livres  in  peltries,  which  he  paid  to  Pierre  St.  Martin  for 
having  brought  the  said  horse,  and  forty  livres  to  the  same  for  the 
said  Lamarche.^ 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix  presented  another  account  of  Samuel  Sills 
amounting  to  the  sum  of  seventy-eight  livres  and  presented  also 
the  statement  of  the  sale  of  his  goods  amounting  to  the  sum  of 
one  hundred  and  ten  livres  ten  sols. 

The  Court  granted  to  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix  seventy-eight  livres  in 
peltries,  and  ordered  that  the  balance  be  deposited  in  the  hands 
of  the  sheriff  for  the  payment  of  expenses  and  other  creditors,  if 
there  are  any. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  December  7. 
At  a  Court  December  19,  1780. 
Presidents  Joseph  Lepage.        Ant.  Harmand. 
Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.  Philippe  Gervais. 

Present. . 
Fr.  Trottier,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Martin  Defendant 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  a  horse,  which  he  ex- 
changed with  him  for  an  ox  and  which  the  defendant  refuses  to 
give  him. 

The  defendant  answers  that  the  plaintiff  promised  to  give  him 
a  good  ox,  such  as  he  had  demanded,  to  match  one  of  his  own. 

*  Thus  sparing  Matelot  these  expenses. 


8o  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Vue  Les  Difficult^  des  partis  La  Cour  a  demend^  Des  preuve 
par  temoin  de  Leur  Echang^. 

pierre  roy  ayant  pretd  Serment  a  dit  que  martin  a  dit  a  M'^ 
trotier  que  Son  Boeuf  navoit  jamais  tire  Et  que  M^  trotier  Luy  a 
dit  quil  gageroit  Le  Boeuf  quil  av[oit]  tirrd. 

appres  avoir  Entendu  Les  parties  reciproquement  La  Cour, 
a  Condannd  Le  deffendeur  a  tenir  Lechange  avec  Le  demendeur. 
Et  quand  a  Leur  gajur  EUe  a  Et^  renvoy^  Sans  auq'une  Condan- 
nation,  Et  quand  au  fraix  de  Justice  il  Sont  Condann^  a  En 
payer  Chaqu'n  La  moitie. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourn^  Jeudy  21  xbre. 

fr  saucier  Greffier  Jh  lepage  presidan. 

a  une  Cour  du  18^®  Jenvier  1781. 
president  J^  Lepage  J"  B*®  Lacroix 

ant  armant  Ch^®  Ducharme 

present 
Demendeur  B*®  Bargeon         Deffendeur  alexis  tabaut 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  Deffendeur  au  Sujet  d'une  acte 
de  Donnation  de  toutes  Ses  biens  moyenant  que  Le  Deffendeur 
ne  manque  pas  a  aucune  chause  Dont  il  Etoit  oblige  par  Lad**® 
Donnation  Et  quau  Contraire  quil  est  Sorti  de  Ches  Luy  Sans 
Seulement  L'en  avertir  ni  San  Savoir  pourquoy  Et  demande  que 
Le  Deffendeur  Luy  paye  un  Dedomagement,  ou  que  La  Dona- 
tion aye  tourjour  Lieu. 

Le  Deffendeur  repond  par  requette  quil  Est  Sorti  de  La 
maison  du  Demendeur  pour  Eviter  a  lavenir  accident  facheux 
Vue  que  Led*  Demendeur  a  fait  Son  possible  pour  pousser  Son 
Exes  de  Libertinage  et  de  subornation  envers  La  femme  Du 
deffendeur  et  demende  La  Cassation  de  La  ditte  Donation  Et  quil 
Luy  Soit  Livre  de  Sortir  de  la  maison  dud*  Demendeur  avec  Ses 
effest  Et  Le  Condanner  a  payer  Sa  pention  et  Blanchichage 
depuis  quil  Est  a  Ses  sarge 

La  Cour  a  accorde  au  Sieur  tabau  suivant  sa  demande  La 
Cassation  de  Lad**®  Donnation  Et  a  ordonne  au  S'"  Bergeron  de 

1  This  Icind  of  donation  was  very  common.  The  donor  conveyed  by  deed  of  gift  all  his 
property  to  the  donee  in  return  for  board,  lodging,  etc.,  for  life.    Ferriere,  CoiUume  de  Paris, 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1781  81 

In  view  of  the  difficulty  between  the  parties  the  Court  demanded 
proofs  by  witnesses  of  their  exchange. 

Pierre  Roy  took  oath  and  said  that  Martin  told  M.  Trottier 
that  his  ox  had  never  drawn  and  that  M.  Trottier  answered  that 
he  would  warrant  the  ox  that  it  had  drawn. 

After  having  heard  both  parties,  the  Court  condemned  the 
defendant  to  hold  to  the  exchange  with  the  plaintiff  and  as  to 
their  pledge  [?]  it  has  been  dismissed  without  any  condemna- 
tion, and  as  to  the  costs  of  justice  they  are  each  condemned  to 
pay  half. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  December  21. 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  Jos.  Lepage,  President. 

At  a  Court,  January  18,  1781. 
President,  Jos.  Lepage.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix. 

Ant.  Harmand.  Ch.  DuCharme. 

Bte.  Bergeron,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Alexis  Tabeau,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  in  regard  to  an  act  of  donation 
of  all  his  goods  made  on  condition  that  the  defendant  should  fail  in 
nothing,  to  which  he  was  bound  by  the  said  donation.^  Con- 
trary to  the  agreement  the  defendant  has  left  the  plaintiff's  house 
without  giving  notice  and  without  the  plaintiff's  knowledge  of 
the  cause.  He  now  demands  that  the  defendant  pay  him  a  com- 
pensation or  that  the  donation  continue  in  force. 

The  defendant  answers  by  petition  alleging  that  he  left  the 
plaintiff's  house  to  avoid  any  future  disagreeable  accidents,  because 
the  plaintiff  tried  his  hardest  to  extend  his  excessive  licentiousness 
and  subornation  to  the  defendant's  wife;  and  he  demands 
the  annulment  of  the  said  donation  and  that  he  be  free  to  go  forth 
from  the  plaintiff's  house  with  his  property  and  that  the  plaintiff 
be  condemned  to  pay  his  board,  lodging  and  washing,  since  he  is 
bound  to  support  him. 

The  Court  granted  M.  Tabeau,  in  accordance  with  his  prayer, 
the  annulment  of  the  said  donation  and  ordered  M.  Bergeron  to 
return  to  the  said  Tabeau  whatever  he  might  have  belonging  to 

iii.,  1017  et  seq.;  Alvord,  Illinois  in  the  Eighteenth  Century,  Bulletin  of  111.  State  Hist.  Lib. 
vol.  i.,  No  I 


82  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

remettre  aud^  tabau  ce  qui  peut  avoir  a  luy  appartenant  Ches 
Luy  et  a  payer  trois  mois  de  pention  aud*  tabau  et  Blanchissage 
a  raison  de  trente  Cinq  Livres  par  mois  et  a  payer  Les  fraix  de 
Justice  Le  tout  Contant. 

B*^  Bargeon  Demendeur    Michel  Chartier  Deffendeur 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  Le  Loyer  d'un 
terrin  quil  a  occupe  pour  faire  du  tabac  moyenant  quinze  Livres 
de  tabac  que  Le  deffendeur  devoit  remettre  au  Demendeur:  et 
quil  refuse  de  faire  aujourdhuy. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  quayant  Louer  Le  terrin  Du  Demend- 
eur et  y  ayant  mis  du  tabac,  que  quel  que  tems  apres  Le  demend- 
eur a  pris  un  homme  ches  Luy  et  que  Son  Cheval  Luy  a  fait  un 
tor  Considerable  Et  que  L'ayand  [sic]  d*  au  demendeur  il  Luy 
auroit  repondu  qu'un  cheval  ne  mange  pas  de  tabac  Le  deffend- 
eur dit  que  le  demandeur  ne  devoit  pas  permettre  a  qui  que  se 
soit  De  mettre  aucun  animal  dans  un  terrin  des  quil  Le  Loue. 

Le  demendeur  repond  qu'il  a  permis  de  mettre  Le  cheval  de 
I'homme  quil  avoit  ches  Luy  dans  Le  terrin  Mais  quil  Luy  avoit 
Deffendu  de  Le  Lesser  Livre. 

La  Cour  a  Condanner  Le  demendeur  a  payer  Les  fraix  de 
Justice  et  a  perdre  Les  quinze  livres  de  tabac  que  le  deffendeur 
Devoit  Lui  Livrer. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  Jeudy  i^^  fevrier 

Jh  lepage  presidan 
a  une  Cour  du  i  fevrier  1781 
President  Joseph  Lapage  ant.  armant 

Ch  Ducharme  philipe  Jervais 

jn  gte  Lacroix  fr.  Courrie 

present 

J"  B*^  Lacroix  Demendeur    Lefevre  Deffendeur 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  Deffendeur  pour  une  somme  de 
trente  trois  Livres  En  pelleterie  que  le  nome  Jan  marie  trotie  Luy 
devoit  Luy  ayant  repondu  de  Luy  payer  Comme  ayant  Ches 
Luy  un  peu  de  mays  a  luy  appartenant. 

Joseph  Bissonette  ayant  parru  a  prete  serment  et  a  dit  quil  Etoit 
temoins  Lorsque  m^  Lefevre  a  promis  de  payer  a  m^  Lacroix 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1781        83 

the  latter  at  his  house  and  to  pay  three  months'  board,  lodging  and 
washing  for  the  said  Tabeau  at  the  rate  of  thirty-five  livres  a  month, 
and  to  pay  the  costs  of  justice,  all  in  money. 

Bte.  Bergeron,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Michel  Chartier,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  the  rent  for  land,  which 
he  occupied  for  the  cultivation  of  tobacco.  The  rent,  which  the 
defendant  was  to  pay  the  plaintiff,  was  fifteen  pounds  of  tobacco, 
which  he  refuses  to  pay  to-day. 

The  defendant  answers  that  some  time  after  he  had  rented 
the  land  of  the  plaintiff  and  had  set  out  his  tobacco,  the  plaintiff 
brought  into  his  own  house  a  man,  whose  horse  had  done  the  plants 
considerable  damage;  and  when  he  told  the  plaintiff  about  it,  the 
latter  had  answered  that  a  horse  did  not  eat  tobacco.  The  defend- 
ant says  that  the  plaintiff  ought  not  to  permit  any  one  to  put  an 
animal  in  a  field  after  he  rents  it. 

The  plaintiff  answers  that  he  permitted  the  man,  who  was  at 
his  house,  to  put  his  horse  in  the  field;  but  that  he  had  forbidden 
him  to  let  it  loose. 

The  Court  condemned  the  plaintiff  to  pay  the  costs  of  justice 
and  to  lose  the  fifteen  pounds  of  tobacco,  which  the  defendant 
was  to  pay. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  February  i. 

Jos.  Lepage,  President. 

At  a  Court,  February  i,  1781. 
President,  Joseph  Lepage.        Ant.  Harmand. 
Ch.  DuCharme.  Philippe  Gervais.  . 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.  Fr.  Courier 

Present. 
Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Lefevre,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  a  sum  of  thirty-three  livres 
in  peltries,  which  the  named  Jean  Marie  Trottier  owed  him,  and 
for  the  payment  of  which  the  defendant  was  responsible,  since 
he  had  at  his  house  some  corn  belonging  to  the  said  Trottier. 

Joseph  Bissonette  appeared  and  made  oath.  He  said  that  he 
was  a  witness,  when  M.  Lefevre  promised  to  pay  M.  LaCroix 


84  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

trente  trois  Livres  en  pelleterie  que  J"  marie  trotier  Luy  devoit  Ce 
a  quoi  M'"  Lefevre  a  consenti,  moyenant  que  Le  mays  quil  avoit 
ches  Luy  aud^  trotier  Luy  resteroit. 

La  Cour  a  Condann^  Le  Sieur  Lefevre  a  payer  au  Sieur 
Lacroix  trente  trois  Livres  en  pelleterie  Comme  il  paroit  quil  a 
repondu  de  Le  faire  par  Le  t^monis  qui  a  pret^  Serment  et  a  gar- 
der  Le  mays  qui  pent  Luy  rester  apartenant  aud*  feu  trotier  et  a 
payer  Les  fraix. 

La  Cour  Est  ajoumd  au  8  du  Cour* 

f.  saucier  gr  Jh  Lepage  P 

A  une  Cour  du  8  mars  1781. 
President.  Ch.  Ducharme  Clement  Langlois 

J^  Lepage  Present 

Demendeur  J°  B*^  Lacroix 
Le  Demendeur  prdsente  En  cour  un  Billet  de  feu  Jean  B*^ 
amellin  de  La  somme  de  Cinq  Cent  une  Livre  qui  Lui  est  Due,  Et 
Demende  quil  Soit  fait  une  vante  Des  Effest  Dud*  feu  amellin 
pour  Satisfaire  a  Se  quil  Luy  Est  Du. 

La  Cour  a  accord^  quil  Soit  fait  une  vente  par  Encan  public 
des  Effest  dud*  feu  amellin  pour  Satisfaire  a  Ses  D^ptes,  aux 
illinois  Et  par  privilege  a  Ce  qui  pent  Etre  Due  au  Demandeur 
pour  pension  et  fourniture  quil  Luy  a  fait  Et  que  Lad**^  Vente 
Soit  faitte  Dimanche  11  Du  present,  Et  ont  a  Cette  Effest  Ellu 
La  personne  de  M^  J^  B*^  Lacroix  pour  Gerer  et  regler  Les 
Compte  Dud*  feu  amelin,  Et  Lobligeon  de  De  [sic]  rendre  Compte 
de  Lad*®  Succesion  Lorsquil  En  Sera  requis. 

fr.  saucier  DuCharme  pr^sd. 

a  une  Cour  du  29  mars  1781. 
President,  Jos^  Lepage  ant  Armant 

Charle  Ducharme  J°  B*®  Lacroix 

Pres 
M  Laurant  Duroch^  presente  a  la  Cour  un  Billet  de  huit 
Cent  Soixante  Et  Douze  Livres  en  pellterie  a  L'ordre  de  M^ 

1  Hamelin  was  undoubtedly  the  J.  Bte.  Hamelin  who  led  the  expedition  against  St.  Joseph 
in  the  fall  of  1780. — Introduction,  p.  xcii. 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1781  85 

thirty-three  livres  in  peltries  which  Jean  Marie  Trottier  owed  the 
latter,  provided  the  corn  at  his  house,  belonging  to  the  said 
Trottier,  remained  his. 

The  Court  condemned  M.  Lefevre  to  pay  M.  LaCroix  thirty- 
three  livres  in  peltries,  which  he  had  become  responsible  for  doing, 
as  appears  from  the  testimony  of  the  witness,  who  has  made 
oath;  and  to  keep  the  corn,  belonging  to  the  late  Trottier,  which 
might  be  left  and  to  pay  the  costs. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  8th  of  the  present  month. 
F.  Saucier,  Jos.  Lepage,  President. 

At  a  Court,  March  8,  1781. 
President.  Ch.  DuCharme.        Clement  Langlois. 
Jos.  Lepage.  Present. 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  PlamtifiF. 
The  plain tifif  presents  in  Court  a  note  of  the  late  Jean  Bte, 
Hamelin  for  the  sum  of  five  hundred  and  one  livres,  which  is 
due  him;  and  prays  that  there  be  made  a  sale  of  the  goods  of 
the  said  late  Hamelin  to  satisfy  what  is  due  him.^ 

The  Court  granted  that  there  be  held  a  sale  by  public  auction 
of  the  goods  of  the  late  Hamelin  to  satisfy  his  debts  in  Illinois, 
and  by  preference  what  may  be  due  the  plaintiff  for  board  and 
lodging,  and  supplies  which  he  has  furnished  him,  and  decreed 
that  the  said  sale  be  made  Sunday,  the  nth  of  the  present  month. 
For  this  purpose  they  have  elected  M.  Jean  Bte.  Lacroix  to 
carry  out  the  sale  and  to  settle  the  accounts  of  the  said  late 
Hamelin;  and  we  bind  him  to  render  account  of  the  said 
estate,  when  it  shall  be  required. 

Fr.  Saucier.  Ducharme,  President. 

At  a  Court,  March  29,  1781. 
President,  Jos.  Lepage.  Ant.  Harmand. 

Charles  Ducharme  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix. 

Present. 
M.  Laurent  Durocher^  presents  in  Court  a  note  for  eight 
hundred  and  seventy-two  livres  in  peltries  drawn  to  the  order 
of  M.   Cerr^  and  owed  by  the  late  Jean  Bte.  Hamelin,  and 

2  Laurent  du  Rocher  was  a  merchant  in  St.  Louis. 


86  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

Cerr^  Due  Par  feu  Jean  B^®  amellin  Et  demande  que  Led*  Billet 
Luy  Soit  Payd  par  La  Succession  dud*  feu  amellin. 

La  Cour  a  accorde  au  Demendeur  quil  Luy  soit  remis  par 
J^  B*^  Lacroix  Le  reste  de  ce  que  pouroit  se  trouver  Due  a  feu 
jn  gte  amellin  apres  lavoir^  et  paye  que  cera  Endoce  Sur  Son  billet 
comme  il  a  Et^  accorde  par  La  Cour. 

ant.  armant  presente  a  la  Cour  un  Billet  de  Cent  Cinquante 
Livres  en  pelleterie  qui  Luy  son  due  par  Jaques  Vasseur,  et 
Demande  quil  Luy  Soit.permis  de  faire  Vendre  Ses  Effest  pour 
Satisfaire  a  Son  d*  Billet. 

La  Cour  accorde  quil  Soit  fait  une  vente  par  Encan  Public  pour 
Satisfaire  a  Ses  Deptes  au  Illinois.  Et  que  Le  reste  Si  il  y  a  Soit 
remis  Entre  Les  mains  du  Cherif ,  pour  Etre  remis  a  qui  il  appar- 
tiendra. 

fr  saucier  Greffier  Jh  lepage  pr^sidan 

a  une  Cour  du  19  avril  1781. 
President  Ch  Ducharme  Clem*  Langlois 

ant  armant  phi  Gervais 

Jos^  Lepage  fr  Courier 

Present 
Nicolas  boimenu  Demendeur  contre  La  Succession  de  J'^ 

B*®  AMELLIN 

La  Demendeur  demande  a  la  Cour  que  m^  B*^  Lacroix  charge 
des  affaires  de  B*^  amellin  quil  Luy  soit  paye  douze  pot  de  tafia 
que  led*  feu  amellin  Luy  doit  En  Echange  d'un  Cheval  quil  a  fait 
avec  Le  demendeur  en  allant  a  S*  Joseph. 

Les  nomme  ignace  et  Saint  michel  ont  parru  Et  ont  pretty 
Serment  quils  Etoient  t^moins  Lgrsqu' amellin  a  fait  Le  d* 
Echange  En  alant  a  S*  Joseph  Et  quil  devoit  donner  icy  Les  dits 
Douze  pot  de  tafia  a  boimenu. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  a  M^  Lacroix  Chargd  Des  affaires  de  B*® 
amellin  de  remettre  a  nicolas  Boimenu  onze  pot  de  tafia  quil 
a  reconnu  devoir  aud*  feu  amellin  et  aux  Cas  quil  Survienne 

1  The  ''apres  lavoir"  was  inserted  by  the  clerk,  who  made  the  mistake  of  placing  the  sign 
of  insertion  before  instead  of  after  the  ''et." 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1781  87 

prays  that  the  note  be  paid  by  the  estate  of  the  late  Hamelin 
aforesaid. 

The  Court  granted  to  the  plaintiff  that  there  be  given 
him  by  Jean  Bte.  Lacroix  the  balance  that  is  due  the  late 
Jean  Bte.  Hamelin  and  ordered  that  after  having  paid^  it 
there  shall  be  endorsed  on  his  note  that  it  was  granted  by  the 
Court. 

Ant.  Harmand  presents  in  Court  a  note  for  one  hundred  and 
fifty  livres  in  peltries,  which  are  due  him  by  Jacques  Vasseur, 
and  prays  that  he  be  permitted  to  have  the  latter' s  effects  sold 
to  satisfy  his  note. 

The  Court  granted  that  there  be  made  a  sale  of  his  effects 
by  public  auction  to  satisfy  his  debts  in  the  Illinois;  and  that 
the  balance,  if  any,  be  deposited  in  the  hands  of  the  sheriff  to 
be  delivered  to  whomever  it  belongs. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  Jos.  Lepage,  President. 

At  a  Court,  April  19,  178 1. 
President,  Ch.  Ducharme.         Clem.  Langlois. 
Ant.  Harmand.  Ph.  Gervais. 

Jos.  Lepage.  Fr.  Courier. 

Present. 
Nicolas  Boismenu,  Plaintiff, 

vs.  THE  Estate  of  Jean  Bte.  Hamelin. 
The  plaintiff  prays  the  Court  that  M.  Bte.  Lacroix,  in 
charge  of  the  estate  of  Bte.  Hamelin,  pay  to  him  a  dozen  jugs  of 
tafia,  which  the  said  late  Hamelin  owed  him  in  exchange  for  a 
horse,  which  exchange  was  made  with  the  plaintiff  while  they 
were  going  to  St.  Joseph. 

The  named  Ignace  and  Saint  Michel  appeared  and  made 
oath  that  they  were  witnesses  when  Hamelin  made  the  said  ex- 
change on  the  way  to  St.  Joseph,  and  they  said  that  he  was  to 
give  the  said  dozen  jugs  of  tafia  to  Boismenu  here. 

The  Court  ordered  M.  Lacroix,  trustee  of  the  estate  of  Bte. 
Hamelin,  to  deliver  to  Nicolas  Boismenu  eleven  jugs  of  tafia,  which 
have  been  acknowledged  to  be  due  from  the  said  late  Hamelin, 
and   in  case  there  remains  anything  of  the  estate  of  the  late 


88  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

quelque  Chause  a  la  Succession  de  feu  amellin  Led*  S'*  Lacroix 
Sera  oblige  de  tenir  Compte  aud*  boimenue  de  Lautre  pot  de  tafia 
qui  Luy  reste  etre  du. 

Ducharme  presd 
a  une  Cour  du  23  avril  1780  [sic]. 
President  Ch.  Ducharme  Clement  Langlois 

Jos^  Lepage  fr.  Courrier 

B^e  Lacroix  philipe  Jervais 

ant.  armant  Present 

La  Cour  Etant  assemble  pour  Examiner  une  requette  pr^- 
sente  par  Les  habitant  Des  Cahos  Contre  mons^  Girrandin  pour 
Les  terre  quil  consede  Et  Le  tor  que  cela  fait  au  village  Et 
demande  quil  Soit  Deffendu  aud*  Sieur  Girardin  de  passer  outre 
n'ayant  aucun  Droit  de  former  un  village  et  de  Conseder  Des 
terres  qui  ont  Ete  reserve  pour  Ce  village  ou  de  produire  Les 
droits  quil  a  de  faire  Le  tor  quil  Causera  par  La  Suitte  a  ce 
village  En  agissant  comme  il  fait. 

La  Court  appres  avoir  Examine  Les  plaintes  porte  En  La 
requette  Contre  m^  Girardin  De  la  part  Des  habitant  il  a  Et6 
accorde  que  La  ditte  requette  Et  Santance  Si  dessus  Sera  Sinifi^ 
a  M^  Girardin,  quil  aye  a  produire  Le  droit  quil  a  de  Conseder 
et  former  un  village  par  La  Suitte  a  la  prairie  du  pon  Et  a  deffaut 
de  preuve  Sufhsante  il  Luy  est  Deffendu  de  Conseder  auq'une 
terre  ni  de  former  auqu'n  Etablissement  que  pour  Son  utillit^ 
a  Luy  propre  Comme  Grange  Engar  ou  maison. 

Du  Charme  presd 
a  une  meme  Court  du  23  D'avril  il  a  Ete  presente  un  Compte 
par  Louis  Gauts  il  a  Et  [sic]  ordonne  au  Sieur  B*^  LaCroix  de 
Luy  payer  soixante  neuf  Livres  dix  Sols  quil  Luy  Est  du  par 
B*^  amelin  Et  qui  a  Ete  Deja  presente  Si  devant. 

DuCharme  presd 

1  Antoine  Girardin  bought  in  1764  the  plantation,  a  seigniory  it  was  called,  from  the  mission 
of  St.  Sulpice.  This  was  situated  at  Prairie  du  Pont,  where  the  missionaries  had  built  a  mill. 
Reynolds,  in  his  Pioneer  History,  48  and  54,  says  that  the  village  of  Prairie  du  Pont  was  estab- 
lished in  1760.     There  could  have  been  at  that  time  little  more  than  a  settlement  of  the  work- 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1780  89 

Hamelin,  the  said  M.  Lacroix  shall  be  obliged  to  render  account 
to  the  said  Boismenu  for  the  other  jug  of  tafia,  which  remains 
due  to  him. 

DuCharme,  President. 
At  a  Court,  April  23,  1780. 
President,  Ch.  DuCharme.      Clement  Langlois 
Jos.  Lepage.  Fr.  Courier. 

Bte.  LaCroix.  Philippe  Gervais. 

Ant.  Harmand.  Present. 

The  Court  assembled  to  examine  a  petition  presented  by  the 
inhabitants  of  Cahokia  against  M.  Girardin  on  account  of  the 
land,  which  he  is  conceding,  and  the  injury,  which  that  does 
the  village ;  and  they  demand  that  M.  Girardin  be  forbidden  to 
continue,  since  he  has  no  right  to  form  a  village  and  to  concede 
lands,  which  have  been  reserved  for  this  village,  or  that  he 
show  what  right  he  has  to  do  the  village  this  injury  which  he 
will  cause  as  a  consequence  of  his  present  actions. 

The  Court,  after  examining  the  complaints  made,  in  the  peti- 
tion against  M.  Girardin  on  the  part  of  the  inhabitants,  granted 
that  the  said  petition  and  above  decree  shall  be  served  on  M. 
Girardin,  that  he  show  what  right  he  has  to  concede  land 
and  form  a  village  subsequently  at  the  Prairie  du  Pont ;  and  in 
default  of  sufficient  proof  it  is  forbidden  him  to  concede  any  land 
or  form  any  establishment  other  than  is  for  his  own  use  as  barn, 
shed  or  house. ^ 

DuCharme,  President. 
At  the  same  Court  April  23,  there  has  been  presented  an  ac- 
count by  Louis  Gaud;  and  M.  Bte.  LaCroix  was  ordered  to  pay 
him  sixty-nine  livres  ten  sols,  which  are  due  him  by  Bte.  Hamelin, 
and  which  account  has  been  presented  before. 

DuCharme,  President. 

ingmen  on  the  plantation  of  the  mission.  The  above  record  and  others  in  this  volume  show 
that  during  this  period  the  land  of  the  village  was  taken  up  by  the  inhabitants  of  Cahokia. 
Pp-  153.  159.  565.  591- 


90  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  17  May.  1781. 
President  Ch.  Ducharme  ant.  armant 

B*^  Lacroix  Clem*  Langlois 

ph^®  Gervais  Jos^  Lepage 

present 
Jean  Lapence  Demendeur  Jos^  pelletie  Deffendeui' 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  Deffendeur  pour  Six  Jeux.  de 
ray  qui  Luy  a  pris  Dans  Le  bois  de  la  grand  cheniere  Et  Comme 
Les  ditte  ray  ont  ete  trouve  ches  Le  deffendeur,  Le  demendeur  de- 
mande  quelle  Luy  Soit  rendu  ou  paye  Suivant  Lestimation  qui 
en  Sera  faitte  par  Des  ouvrie. 

Le  deffendeur  declare  quil  est  vray  quil  a  pris  de  quoy  Si 
faire  une  paire  de  roux  Et  que  Le  nom6  Leme  En  a  pris  aussi  Sans 
Savoir  La  quantite. 

Le  nome  Leme  ayant  paru  a  deClare  En  avoir  pris  une  vin- 
tenne. 

La  Cour  a  Condanne  Les  nom^  Leme  Et  pelletie  a  rendre  ou  a 
payer  La  quantite  de  ray  que  Le  Demendeur  Declare  Luy  avoir 
Et^pris  par  part  Egalle  ainsi  que  Les  fraix. 

m^  Billele  Demendeur  neveux  Defendeur 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  une  Somme  de 
Cent  Soixante  neuf  Livres  en  pelleterie  que  Le  defendeur  reste 
Luy  Devoir  par  Son  Billet  que  Le  demendeur  a  produit  a  La 
Cour. 

a  une  meme  Cour  Le  Sieur  Clement  Langlois  a  presenter 
un  autre  Billet  de  Cent  Livre  de  Castor  due  par  Le  meme. 

La  Cour  ayant  Su  que  le  Deffendeur  a  En  sa  possession  un 
Cheval  et  quelque  pourceau  il  a  Ete  Condanne  a  paye  Les  deux 
billet  que  vienne  D'Etre  presente  Et  a  Ete  accorde  aud*  Demend- 
eur une  Saisi  Sur  tout  se  que  pent  appartenir  aud*  neveux,  pour 
Etre  vendu,  au  deffaut  de  payement. 
La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  Jeudy  7  Juin. 

DuCharme  presd. 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1781  91 

At  a  Court,  May  17,  1781. 
President,  Ch.  DuCharme.         Ant.  Harmand. 
Bte.  LaCroix.  Clement  Langlois. 

Phil.  Gervais.  Jos.  Lepage. 

Present. 
Jean  Lapance,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jos.  Pelletier,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  six  sets  [?]  of  spokes, 
which  he  had  taken  in  the  woods  of  the  Big  Mushrooms;  and, 
since  the  said  spokes  have  been  found  at  the  defendant's  house, 
the  plaintiff  demands  that  they  be  returned  to  him,  or  paid  for, 
according  to  an  appraisement,  which  shall  be  made  by  workmen. 
The  defendant  declares  that  it  is  true  that  he  took  some  to 
make  a  pair  of  wheels  and  that  the  named  Lemay  took  some  also 
without  knowing  the  quantity.^ 

The  named  Lemay  appeared  and  declared  that  he  took  a  score. 

The  Court  condemned  the  named  Lemay  and  Pelletier    to 

return  the  spokes  or  to  pay   in   equal  parts  for  the  quantity, 

which  the  plaintiff  declares  to  have  been  taken,  and  to  share  the 

costs. 

M.  BiLLELE,  Plaintiff  vs.  Neveux,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  a  sum  or  one  hundred 
and  sixty-nine  livres  in  peltries,  which  the  defendant  still  owes 
on  his  note,  which  the  plaintiff  produced  in  Court. 

At  the  same  Court  M.  Clement  Langlois  presented  another 
note  for  one  hundred  pounds  of  beaver  skins  due  by  the  same. 

Since  the  Court  knows  that  the  defendant  has  in  his  posses- 
sion a  horse  and  some  pigs,  he  has  been  condemned  to  pay  the 
two  notes,  which  have  just  been  presented ;  and  there  has  been 
granted  the  plaintiff  a  seizure  on  all  the  possessions  of  the  said 
Neveux,  which  are  to  be  sold  in  default  of  payment. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  June  7. 

DuCharme,  President 

1  To  make  wheels  for  a  tombre. 


92  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  31  May  1781. 
President  Ch.  Ducharme  fr.  Courier 

J^  Lepage  ant.  amant 

B*®  Lacroix  phile  Jervais 

cle"*  Langlois  present 

La  Cour  Etant  assemble  pour  Demender  a  M'"  Girardin 
[Page  or  pages  missing.] 

19  Juin  1781. 

F.  Saucier  Clark 
Lepage  iii  Maud 

Jervais  iiii  Jan 

Lamarch  i 
Granmon  i 
Dubuque  i  Lan 

19  Juine  1781. 
President  Che  Ducharme  ant.  armant 

B*®  Lacroix  phil.  Gervais 

Clem*  Langlois  fr.  Courie 

Pres 
La  Cour  Etant  assemble  pour  Prendre  Les  Serments  de 
fidelity  ainsi  que  d'ofice  des  Sieurs  George  Blin,  raphael  Gagne, 
Pierre  Granmon  Joseph  Cecire  Baptiste  Saucier,  Jean  B*® 
Hubert  Lacroix  et  Jean  B*^  Dubuc  Comme  ayant  Ete  nome  par 
une  assemble  publique  faitte  Le  dix  de  Ce  mois  en  La  maison  de 
m^  fr.  trottier  Comd*  de  ce  village  pour  remplace  Les  magistrat. 
ci  devant  nome. 

Les  Suivant  Juges  mentione  ci  desus  par  La  derniere  Elextion 
faits  ont  pris  Le  Serment  de  fidelite  aux  Etats  ainsi  que  Celuy 
d'office  de  Juge  de  paix  &c.  Selon  leurs  liste. 

a  une  Cour  tenue  pour  Le  district  des  Cahokia  du  village  des 
Cahokia  Le  19  Juin  mil  Sept  Cent  quatrevingt  un. 

a  ordonne  que  fr.  Saucier  Soit  apoint^  dark  de  cette  Cour. 
Francois  Saucier  a  pris  le  Serment  de  fidelite  Et  doffice  et  a 
pris  Sa  place  en  qualite  de  Clark. 

1  When  first  seen,  the  Record  had  fallen  to  pieces  and  some  of  the  pages  werelost.  With 
the  exception  of  the  few  pages  at  the  beginning  and  these  few  pages  here,  the  record  is  complete . 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1781  93 

At  a  Court,  May  31,  1781. 
President,  Ch.  DuCharme.        Fr.  Courier. 
Jos.  Lepage.  Ant.  Harmand. 

Bte.  LaCroix.  ^  Phil.  Gervais. 

Clem.  Langlois.  Present. 

The  Court  assembled  to  demand  from  M.  Girardin^ 
[Page  or  pages  missing.] 

June  19,  1781^ 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk. 
Lepage  in  Maud 

Gervais  11 11  Jan 

Lamarche  i 
Grandmont  i 
Dubuque  i  The  year. 

June  19,  1781. 
President,  Ch.  Ducharme.  Ant.  Harmand. 

Bte.  LaCroix.  Phil.  Jervais. 

Clem.  Langlois.  Fr.  Courier. 

Present. 
The  Court  assembled  to  receive  the  oaths  of  fidelity  as  well  as 
those  of  ofl&ce  from  MM.  George  Blin,  Raphael  Gagn^,  Pierre 
Grandmont,  Joseph  Cesirre,  Baptiste  Saucier,  Jean  Bte.  Hubert 
LaCroix  and  Jean  Bte.  Dubuque,  who  have  been  elected  by  public 
assembly  held  the  tenth  of  this  month  in  the  house  of  M.  Fr. 
Trottier,  commandant  of  this  village,  to  replace  the  magistrates 
named  above. 

The  following  judges,  mentioned  above  and  made  by  the 
last  election,  have  taken  the  oath  of  fidelity  to  the  States  as 
well  as  that  of  office  of  justices  of  the  peace  etc.  according  to 
their  list. 

At  a  Court  held  for  the  district  of  Cahokia  in  the  village  of  Ca- 
hokia,  June  19,  1781. 

It  was  ordered  that  Fr.  Saucier  be  appointed  clerk  of  this  Court. 

2  This  entry  is  given  a  whole  page.  Is  it  a  ballot  sheet?  Ballot  sheets  at  Kaskaskia  were 
more  elaborate  than  this,  but  even  there  the  number  of  voters  was  very  small,  in  1781  only 
twenty-seven  and  in  the  next  year  only  twenty-one. 


94  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

nicolas  Chabot  a  pris  le  Serment  de  fidelite  Et  doffice  et  a  pris 
Sa  place  en  qualite  de  Cherif  pour  Le  distric  de  Ce  village. 

Jean  B*^  Bargeon  ayant  dit  a  S*  Louis,  quil  devoit  partir  dicy 
pour  aller  a  michilimakin[a]  avec  quelquantre  Suivant  Comme 
il  a  Ete  rap[orte]  icy.  B^®  Bargeon  ayant  paru  a  dit  quil  pouvoit 
avoir  Dit  quelque  chose  a  Ce  Sujet  mais  que  Ce  netoit  quen 
Badinan  avec  quelqu'n  de  Ses  amis. 

vue  Le  tems  et  La  Sirconstance  present  La  cour  a  ordonne 
que  B*^  Bargeon  Seroit  mis  En  prison  Vingt  quatre  heure  pour 
Cette  fois  Et  a  Lavenir  Si  il  tenoit  quelque  disCour  pareille  il 
Sera  puni  Sevdrement  Et  a  Ete  aussi  Condanne  a  tous  fraix  Et 
Depanc. 

a  La  Demande  de  m^  fr.  trottier  au  nom  du  public  Les  Sieurs 
Langlois  et  mechante  ont  ete  Condanne  a  produire  Chaq'un  un 
Cotion,  qui  repondron  Deux  Corps  pour  Corps  Le  tens  qui 
Seront  icy. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  que  Led*  Langlois  Et  mechante  oront  Le 
fort  pour  prison  Et  a  Eux  deffendu  de  Sabsenter  Sans  permission 
du  Comd*  de  ce  village,  Led*  mechante  a  produit  pour  Son  Cotion 
La  personne  de  m^  Louis  Lecomte,  et  Led*  Langlois  La  personne 
de  m^  ant.  armant  qui  durera  Jusqua  nouvelle  ordre. 
La  Cour  est  adjourne  Jeudy  Le  5  Juillet. 
fr.  Saucier  dark  G.  Blin  Presidant. 


a  une  Cour  du  21  Juin  1781. 
Pres^  Geo.  Blin  B*®  Saucier 

raph^  Gagne  B*®  Lacroix 

Pierre  Granmon  B*®  Dubuque 

Jos^  Cecire  Present 

M^  fr.  trottier  ayant  fait  assemble  La  Cour  Et  a  port^  Des 
plainte  Contre  Le  nome  B*^  Bargeon  ayant  Ete  Condanne  par 
Lad*^  Cour  a  vingt  quatre  heure  de  prison  pour  des  propos  tenu 

1  Since  Micliillimackinac  was  in  British  territoryj  such  talk  was  treasonable,  particularly 
s  British  agents  were  at  the  time  in  St.  Louis  attempting  to  raise  troops  in  the  French  villages. 

See  next  note. 

2  These  men  were  agents  of  the  British  government  sent  here  to  raise  troops  and  to  detach 
the  French  from  their  allegiance.    They  had  gone  first  to  St.  Louis,  where  they  were  arrested 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1781  95 

Frangois  Saucier  took  the  oath  of  fidelity  and  of  office  and 
took  his  place  as  clerk. 

Nicolas  Chabot  took  the  oath  of  fidelity  and  of  office  and  took 
his  place  as  sheriff  for  the  district  of  this  village. 

Jean  Bte.  Bergeron  is  reported  to  have  said  at  St.  Louis  that  he 
ought  to  set  out  from  here  to  go  to  Michillimackinac  with  some  one. 
Bte.  Bergeron  appeared  and  said  that  he  might  have  said  some- 
thing on  that  subject;  but  that  it  was  only  in  joke  with  some  one 
of  his  friends.^ 

In  view  of  the  times  and  the  present  circumstances,  the  Court 
decreed  that  Bte.  Bergeron  should  be  imprisoned  twenty-four 
hours  for  this  time,  and  in  the  future,  if  he  makes  similar  speeches, 
he  will  be  severely  punished;  and  he  was  also  condemned  to 
pay  all  costs  and  expenses. 

On  the  demand  of  M.  Fr.  Trottier  in  the  name  of  the  public  MM. 
Langlois  and  Mechante  were  condemned  to  find  bondsmen,  who  will 
be  personally  answerable  for  them  during  the  time  they  shall  be  here.^ 

The  Court  ordered  that  the  said  Langlois  and  Mechante  shall 
have  the  fort  for  a  prison  and  forbade  them  to  absent  themselves 
without  the  permission  of  the  commandant  of  this  village.  The 
said  Mechante  offered  for  his  bondsman  the  person  of  M.  Louis 
Lecompte  and  the  said  Langlois  the  person  of  M.  Ant.  Har- 
mand,  who  shall  continue  to  act  until  new  orders. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  July  5. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin,  President. 

At  a  Court,  June  21,  1781. 
President,  Geo.  Blin.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Raph.  Gagnd.  Bte.  LaCroix. 

Pierre  Grandmont.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Jos.  Cesirre.  Present. 

M.  Fr.  Trottier  assembled  the  Court  and  brought  complaint 
against  the  named  Bte.  Bergeron,  who  was  condemned  by  the  said 
Court  to  twenty-four  hours'  imprisonment  for  his  idle  talk,  be- 
by  the  Spanish  commandant  and  a  letter  addressed  to  the  Illinois  French  was  found  on  them. 
The  Spanish  commandant  made  a  report  of  the  event  to  the  American  commandant,  but 
permitted  two  of  the  agents  under  the  indicated  conditions  to  go  to  Cahokia.  A  short  time 
after  this  Harmand  asked  the  court  to' be  released  from  his  bond,  and  Antoine  Girardin  took  his 
place.    For  particulars,  see  pp.  553,  557,  559,  and  Introduction,  p.  cv. 


96  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

par  Led*  Bargeon,  et  que  L'ayant  volu  faire  Conduire  dans  Lad*® 
prison  Led*  Bargeon  auroit  Desobei  au  ordre  qui  ont  Ete  Donn^ 
a  ce  Sujet,  Et  Luy  auroit  manqud  particule'""*  Et  en  Conse- 
quence a  demande  a  La  Cour  que  Led*  Bargeon  Son  [sic]  puni 
plus  severement  quil  n'avoit  Ete  Condanne. 

La  Cour  a  Condann^  Led*  Bargeon  a  quinze  Jour  de  prison, 
A  La  Consideration  de  m^  trotier.  qui  Le  trouve  assd  puni  aprds 
Ce  terns  Et  a  payer  Les  fraix  tant  de  justice  que  Denprisonne- 
ment.  Et  Ce  avant  de  Sortir  de  prison  Sous  peine  dy  rester  plus 
longtems. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  au  5  de  Juillet. 
fr  saucier  Grf.  G  Blin 

a  une  Cour  du  24  Juin  1781. 
George  Blin  Bap*®  Saucier 

Raphael  Gagnier  Bap*®  LaCroix 

Pierre  Granmon  Bap*®  Dubuque 

Joseph  Cessire  President,    [sic] 

une  requette  presentee  a  la  Cour  par  francois  xavier  lapensee 
datt^e  de  ce  Jour  aux  fins  de  luy  permettre  une  assemblee  de 
Parens  et  d'amis  pour  luy  nommer  un  Curateur  pour  prendre 
Ses  Interets  Causes  et  actions  &c. 

k  Ete  apointe  Lad*®  requete  quil  Soit  fait  suivant  sa  Demande 
Les  Jour  et  an  que  de  1'  autre  part. 

Pierre  Prevost  ayant  paru  a  prete  serment  sur  Le  Saint  Evan- 
gille  tout  puissant  de  se  Comporter  vrayement  et  fidelement  dans 
tous  ces  Ecrits  tant  en  Cour  qu'ailleurs  Concernant  La  Succes- 
sion de  feu  mad®  LaPensee  en  Sa  qualite  de  greffier  Commis. 
La  Cour  Est  ajournee  a  Jeudy  prochain  Cinq  Juillet. 

G.  Blin. 

1  After  reaching  his  majority  a  young  man  might  receive  a  curator,  who  did  not  manage 
the  estate  for  him,  but  did  give  him  assistance  in  law-suits,  in  the  settlement  of  his  account 
with  the  guardian  and  in  other  matters. — Viollet,  Hist,  du  droit  civil  Fran(^ais,  591. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1781  97 

cause,  when  he  wished  to  have  him  conducted  to  the  said  prison, 
the  said  Bergeron  disobeyed  the  orders,  which  were  given  on  this 
subject,  and  had  insulted  him  in  particular;  and  in  consequence 
he  prayed  the  Court  that  the  said  Bergeron  be  punished  more  sev- 
erely than  he  had  been  condemned. 

The  Court  condemned  the  said  Bergeron  to  two  weeks'  im- 
prisonment, out  of  consideration  for  M.  Trottier,  who  thinks  he 
will  be  sufficiently  punished  after  this  time,  and  to  pay  the  cost 
both  of  justice  and  imprisonment  before  leaving  prison,  under 
penalty  of  remaining  there  a  longer  time. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  July  5. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 

At  a  Court,  June  24,  1781. 
President,  George  Blin.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Raphael  Gagne.  Bte.  LaCroix. 

Pierre  Grandmont.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Joseph  Cesirre  Present. 

A  petition  presented  to  the  Court  by  Francois  Xavier  Lapanc^, 
dated  this  day,  praying  that  it  be  permitted  him  to  hold  an  assembly 
of  relatives  and  friends  to  name  a  curator  to  take  care  of  his  inter- 
ests, causes  and  actions  etc.^ 

The  said  petition  was  referred  that  it  may  be  done  according 
to  his  prayer,  this  day  and  year  as  on  the  other  part.^ 

Pierre  Prevost  appeared  and  made  oath  on  the  Almighty  Holy 
Gospels  to  conduct  himself  truly  and  faithfully  in  all  these  writ- 
ings, as  well  in  court  as  elsewhere,  concerning  the  estate  of  the 
late  Madam  Lapancd  in  his  character  of  deputy  clerk. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday  following,  July  5. 

G.  Blin. 

^his  expression,  "I' autre  part"  refers  to  the  side  of  the  sheet  of  paper  on  which  the 
petition  to  the  court  was  written,  the  decision  of  the  court  being  written  either  below  or  on  the 
reverse  of  the  sheet. 


98  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

a  une  C*  du  5  Juillet. 
President.  G  Blin  B*®  Saucier 

raphael  Gagne  B*®  Dubuc 

pierre  Granmon  B*®  Lacroix 

Jos^  Cecire  Present 

Demendeur  AUGUST  racette  Deffendeur  Joseph  vaudry 
La  Cour  Etant  assemble  Et  ayant  Siege  Jusqu'a  neuf  heure 
passe,  Et  apres  avoir  fait  apeller  Le  demendeur  par  Le  Cherif 
par  trois  fois  Different  Et  nayant  point  paru  a  renvoy^  Le  d* 
proces  a  La  Cour  prochaine  et  Le  demendeur  a  payer  tous  Les 
frais  de  Celle  cy.  La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  Jeudy  2.  aout. 

fr  saucier  Clark.  G.  Blin 

une  Cour  du  2  aout  1781. 
Pres*  Geo.  Blin.  B*®  saucier 

rap.  Gagne  B*^  Lacroix 

p^®  Granmon  B*®  Dubuc 

Jos.  Cecire  Present 

Demendeur  J^  B*®  Lacroix  Deffendeur  Isaac  Levy  . 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  Le  rembourse- 
ment  d'une  Somme  de  cen  quarante  neuf  livres  cinq  sols  en 
pelleterie  par  un  Billet  quil  a  Consenti  a  fr.  Ivont  pour  reste  de 
Ses  gages  et  que  Son  Commis.  m^  Lerou  a  acquitte  a  Michelima- 
quina  et  Dont  Le  demendeur  produit  Des  preuves. 

Joseph  Clermont  ayant  paru  et  apres  avoir  prete  Serment 
Sur  Le  S*  Evangille  de  Dieu  tout  puissant  a  dit  quil  a  et^  Jusqua 
michelimaquina  avec  Le  canot  du  demendeur  Et  quen  arivant 
il  a  Et6  temoin  que  Led*  Billet  Si  mentione  a  Ete  paye  par  Le 
Commis  du  demendeur  et  que  cest  une  negligence  de  Son  Commis 
de  ne  I'avoir  pas  retirer. 

Sur  Le  temoignage  que  Joseph  Clermont  Donne  que  Led* 
Billet  a  Ete  paye  par  Le  Commis  dud*  Demendeur,  que  Le 
defendeur  soit  Condanne  a  renbourser  au  demendeur  Le  montant 
du  Susd*  Billet. 

m^  fr.  trottier  demande  a  la  Cour  que  tous  Les  Effest  que  Sont 
ches  ch^®  Lefevre  apparten*  a  Jean  marie  trottier  soit  vendu 
pour  Luy  payer  une  Somme  que  led*  trottier  Luy  Doit,  La  Cour 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1781  99 

At  a  Court,  July  5. 
President,  G.  Blin.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Raphael  Gagn^.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Pierre  Grandmont.  Bte.  LaCroix. 

Jos.  Cesirre.  Present. 

August  Racette,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Joseph  Vaudry,  Defendant. 
The  Court  assembled  and  sat  till  past  nine  o'clock,  and  after 
summoning  the  plaintiff  by  the  sheriff  three  different  times  and 
when  he  did  not  appear,  postponed  the  hearing  of  the  said  suit  till 
next  Court,  and  condemned  the  plaintiff  to  pay  all  the  costs  of  this 
session.      The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  August  2. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 

At  a  Court,  August  2,  1781. 
President,  Geo.  Blin.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Raph.  Gagn^.  Bte.  LaCroix. 

Pierre  Grandmont.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Jos.  Cesirre.  Present. 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Isaac  Levy,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  the  repayment  of  a  sum  of 
one  hundred  and  forty-nine  livres  and  five  sols  in  peltries  for  a  note 
which  he  drew  to  the  order  of  Fr.  Ivont  for  the  balance  of 
his  wages  and  which  the  plaintiff's  clerk,  M.  Lerou,  paid  at  Mich- 
illimackinac,  of  which  the  plaintiff  produces  proof. 

Joseph  Clermont  appeared  and,  after  having  made  oath  on  the 
Holy  Gospels  of  Almighty  God,  said  that  he  went  up  to  Michilli- 
mackinac  with  the  plaintiff's  canoe  and  that  on  arriving  he  was 
witness  that  the  said  note  was  paid  by  the  plaintiff's  clerk  and  that 
it  is  negligence  on  the  part^of  his  clerk  not  to  have  withdrawn  it. 

On  the  testimony  which  Joseph  Clermont  gives  that  the  said 
note  was  paid  by  the  said  plaintiff's  clerk,  the  defendant  is  con- 
demned to  repay  to  the  plaintiff  the  amount  of  the  note  afore- 
said. 

M.  Fr.  Trottier  prays  that  all  the  goods  belonging  to  Jean 
Marie  Trottier,  which  are  at  the  house  of  M.  Lefevre,  be  sold  to 
pay  him  a  sum,  which  the  said  Trottier  owes  him.  The  Court 
decreed  that  Charles  Lefevre  shall  deliver  under  oath  all  the 


loo  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

a  ordonn^  que  Charle  Lefevre  remettra  Sous  Serment  tous  Les 
Effest  que  Sont  Ches  Luy  apartenant  aud*  J°  M®  trottier  pour 
Etre  vendu  pour  Satisfaire  a  Ses  debtes. 

Demendeur  at  armant  defendeur  Jos^  Cecire 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  un  payement 
quil  Luy  a  fait  en  pelleterie,  disant  quayant  ete  ches  Luy  cherchd 
Lad*®  pelleterie  quil  Luy  auroit  Demend^  Si  La  pelleterie  etoit 
Bonne  que  Le  deffendeur  Luy  avoit  dit  quil  L'avoit  recue  pour 
Bonne. 

Le  deffendeur  dit  quil  est  vray  quil  a  dit  au  demendeur  quil 
avoit  re^ue  La  ditte  pelleterie  pour  Bonne,  et  quil  en  pouvoit  faire 
faire  La  recette  et  que  Si  elle  ne  valoit  rien  de  Luy  renvoyer  mais 
que  Le  demendeur  L'ayant  garde  six  Jour;  et  quil  ne  vouloit 
plus  La  reprendre. 

La  Cour  a  Condanne  Le  demendeur  a  garder  Le  payement 
que  Le  deffendeur  Luy  a  fait  pour  ne  Lavoir  pas  renvoye  sur  Le 
Champ  puis  quil  nen  netoit  pas  Contant  et  a  payer  Les  fraix. 
La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  6^®  7^^*®. 
f  saucier  Gf  G  Blin 

une  Cour  du  21  aoust  1781. 
President  G.  Blin  Jo^  Cecire 

raphael.  Gagne  B*®  Dubuc 

p.  Granmon  B*®  Saucier 

present 
une  requette  presente  en  Cour  par  Louis  Clermont  demendant 
quil  Luy  Soit  permis  un  assemble  de  parens  et  d'amis  pour  La 
nomination  d'un  Curateur. 

La  Cour  a  accords  a  Louis  Clermont  ses  demendes.  La 
Cour  Est  ajournd  a  Jeudy  6^®  de  Septembre. 

G  Blin 


COURT  RECORD,  AUGUST,  1781  loi 

effects  belonging  to  the  said  Jean  Marie  Trottier,  which  are  at 
his  house,  in  order  that  they  be  sold  to  satisfy  his  debts. 

Ant.  Harmand  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jos.  Cesirre,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  a  payment,  which  the  latter 
made  him  in  peltries.  The  plaintiff  says  that  when  he  was  at  the 
defendant's  house  to  get  the  said  peltries,  he  asked  the  defendant, 
if  the  peltries  were  of  good  quality,  and  that  he  answered  that  he 
had  received  them  for  good  ones. 

The  defendant  says  that  it  is  true  that  he  said  to  the  plaintiff 
that  he  had  received  them  for  peltries  of  good  quality  and  that  he 
might  have  the  receipt  made  for  them,  and  if  they  were  not  worth 
anything,  to  send  them  back  to  him;  but  the  plaintiff  kept  them 
six  days  and  he  no  longer  wished  to  take  them  back. 

The  Court  condemned  the  plaintiff  to  keep  the  payment  which 
the  defendant  made  him,  because  he  did  not  send  the  peltries 
back  immediately,  since  he  was  not  content  with  them,  and 
to  pay  the  costs. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  September  6. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 

At  a  Court,  August  21,  1781. 
President,  G.  Blin.  Jos.  Cesirre. 

Raphaiel  Gagne  Bte.  .Dubuque. 

Pierre  Grandmont.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Present. 
A  petition  presented  in   Court  by  Louis  Clermont  praying 
that  he  be  permitted  to  hold  an  assembly  of  relatives  and  friends 
for  the  nomination  of  a  curator. 

The  Court  granted  Louis  Clermont  his  request.  The  Court 
adjourned  to  Thursday,  September  6. 

G.  Blin. 


I02  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  20  7^^^  1781. 
Presidant  G.  Blin  pierre  Granmon 

B*®  Lacroix  B*®  Saucier 

Pres. 
Demendeur  M.  Delinctot  Defendeur  Joseph  maisonville 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  une  Jument  quil 
dit  avoir  achete  au  pe  point  Etenpe,  Et  que  le  deffendeur  reclame  a 
Luy  Layant  pris  ches  m^  Janis  a  qui  Le  Demendeur  L'avoit 
change. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  La  Jument  que  Le  demendeur 
reclame  Luy  appartien  Comme  Layant  amen^  Du  poste  Et  que 
Laditte  Jument  Luy  a  Ete  vole  au  petit  village  par  Les  Sauvage 
Et  a  produit  plusieurs  Sertificat  comme  Lad**®  Jument  Luy 
appartient,  Et  offre  Encore  de  produire  D'autre  preuve  tant  Des 
Jens  du  poste  que  Ceux  des  Gas. 

La  Cour  a  renvoye  Les  dittes  partis  a  faire  Dessider  Leur 
Causes  au  Gas  vue  que  Laditte  Jument  y  est  Et  quil  peuvent 
produire  de  plus  grande  pour  terminer  Leur  differens. 
La  Cour  Est  ajourne  au  4^®  8^^®  1781. 
f  saucier  Greff.  G.  Blin. 

a  une  Cour  du  18.  8bre  1781. 
President.  Jn  B*®  Lacroix        raphele  Gagne 
jn  gte  Dubuque  pierre  Granmon 

Pres* 
Demendeur  Joseph  asselin  Deffendeur  pierre  Durbois 
Le  Demendeur  poursuit  Le  defandeur  pour  une  Jumint  quil  luy 
avoit  remis  En  avance  Sur  Les  Gages  quil  Etoit  Convenu  de  Luy 
Donner  pour  decendre  a  la  N^^®  Orleans,  Et  Comme  Led*  demen- 
deur Se  trouve  dans  le  Cas  de  ne  point  tenir  Son  Engagement  il 
reclame  La  ditte  Jument  que  led*  Deffendeur  pretens  Garder 
pour  Dedomagement  Sauf  a  Etre  Condanne  par  La  Cour  a  Luy 
en  payer  un. 

^  Godefroy  Linctot  was,  I  think,  a  Cahokian  Frenchman.  He  raised  the  first  company 
for  Clark  among  the  inhabitants  of  that  village.  When  Clark  was  expecting  to  attack  Detroit 
Major  Linctot  was  sent  by  way  of  the  lUinois  River.  He  was  at  the  time  Indian  commissioner 
for  the  region  of  that  river.  He  was  later  regularly  employed  as  commissioner  by  the  state  of 
Virginia  and  his  knowledge  of  the  Indian  languages  made  him  a  very  useful  officer.  There 
is  a  letter  from  him  to  Clark  printed  on  page  553.  Before  the  end  of  the  war  he  was  killed. 
—  Va.  State  Pap.  ii.,  325,  405,  428;   English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  i.,  370. 


COURT  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1781  103 

At  a  Court,  September  20,  1781. 
President,  G.  Blin.  Pierre  Grandmont. 

Bte.  LaCroix  Bte.  Saucier. 

Present. 
M.  DE  LiNCTOT,^  Plaintiff,  vs.  Joseph  Maisonville,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  a  mare,  which  he  says 
he  bought  unbranded  at  Peoria,  and  which  the  defendant 
claims  and  has  taken  at  the  house  of  M.  Janis  with  whom  the 
plaintiff  had  exchanged  her. 

The  defendant  answers  that  the  mare,  which  the  plaintiff 
claims,  belongs  to  him,  as  he  brought  it  from  the  Post;^  and 
that  the  said  mare  was  stolen  from  him  at  the  Little  Village^ 
by  the  savages;  and  he  produced  several  certificates- that  the 
said  mare  belongs  to  him,  and  offers  to  produce  other  proof 
both  from  people  of  the  Post  and  of  Kaskaskia. 

The  Court  dismissed  the  said  parties  to  have  their  cause 
decided  at  Kaskaskia  seeing  that  the  mare  is  there  and  they  can 
produce  greater  [proof]  to  terminate  their  differences. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  October  4,  1781. 
F.  Saucier,  clerk.  G.  Blin. 

At  a  Court,  October  8,  1781. 
.'     President,  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.  Raphael  Gagne. 
Jean  Bte.  Dubuque.  Pierre  Grandmont. 

Present. 
Joseph  Asselin,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Dubois,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  a  mare,  which  he  had 
advanced  on  the  wages,  which  he  agreed  to  give  the  defen- 
dant for  going  down  to  New  Orleans;  and  since  the  said  plain- 
tiff finds  it  impossible  to  keep  his  engagement,  he  reclaims  the 
said  mare,  which  the  said  defendant  pretends  to  keep  for  damages ; 
unless  he  is  condemned  by  the  Court  to  pay  the  defendant  one 
for  damages. 

The  defendant  answers  by  a  petition  that  the  plaintiff  did  a 
considerable  injury  to  him  in  failing  to  keep  his  engagement, 

2  Vincennes. 

3  St.  Philippe. 


I04  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Le  deffendeur  repond  par  une  requette  que  Ledit  Demendeur 
Luy  fait  un  tor  considerable  de  manquer  a  Ses  Engagement  vue 
quil  auroit  pu  Sengager  a  d'autre,  et  que  Laditte  Jument  quil  La 
recue  En  avance  Luy  reste  pour  Dedomagement. 

Le  Sieur  ant.  Girardin  Demendeur  pour  Jos^asselin,  demende 
a  la  Cour  de  renvoyer  Le  dit  proces  a  La  Cour  prochaine,  pour 
que  Le  dit  asselin  paroisse  Luy  m^me. 

La  Cour  a  ordonn^  que  Le  Susdit  proems  Soit  renvoy^  a  la  Cour 
prochaine. 

Le  Sieur  ant.  armant  Demende  a  La  Cour  de  ce  decharg^  du 
Cotionnement  quil  a  Donn^  pour  Le  nom6  Langlois,  nayant  point 
Eu  un  terme  fixe. 

La  Cour  a  Decharg^  Led*  Sieur  armant  Dud*  Cotionnement 
Et  a  remis  a  M^  trotier  Led*  Langlois  pour  En  faire  ce  que  Bon 
Luy  Semblera. 

fr.  saucier  Clark  J  B  H  LaCroix 

a  une  Cour  25.  octobre  1781. 
President  J^  B*^  Lacroix  raphele  Gagn6 

pierre  Granmon  Jos^  Cecire 

Present 

Demendeur  Jos^  asselin  Deffendeur  pierre  durbois 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  qui  Luy  donne 
des  preuve  du  tor  quil  Luy  a  fait  En  ne  tenant  point  Le 
marche  quils  avoit  fait  Ensemble  de  decendre  a  la  n^^® 
Orleans. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  quil  a  reffuse  quarante  piastre  de  M^. 
Motart  pour  decendre  a  la  N^^^  Orleans  pour  ne  pas  manquer  a 
langement  [sic]  quil  avoit  fait  avec  Led*  demendeur. 

La  Court  a  Condanne  Le  deffendeur  a  rendre  au  demendeur 
La  Jument  quil  Luy  avoit  Donne  En  avance.  Et  que  Le  Service 
quil  a  Eu  de  Laditte  Jument  passe  pour  Son  dedomagement  Et 
quil  Sera  Libre  de  Sangager  a  d'autre  Si  Bon  Luy  Senble  Et  au 
demendeur  a  payer  tous  Les  fraix. 

Demendeur  J^  B*^    Laurins  Deffendeur  Jos^  Dube 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  une  quantity  de 
Six  Cent  Livres  de  farine  quil  Luy  doit  pour  un  cheval  quil  Luy 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1781  105 

seeing  that  he  would  have  been  able  to  engage  himself  to  another, 
and  that  the  said  mare,  which  he  received  in  advance,  should 
remain  his  as  damages. 

M.  Ant.  Girardin,  plaintiff  for  Jos.  Asselin,  prays  the  Court 
to  continue  the  said  cause  to  the  next  Court  in  order  that  the  said 
Asselin  may  appear  himself. 

The  Court  decreed  that  the  above  suit  be  continued  to  the 
next  court. 

M.  Ant.  Harmand  pi  ays  the  Court  to  release  him  from  the 
bail-bond,  which  he  gave  for  the  named  Langlois  and  which  did 
not  have  a  fixed  term. 

The  Court  released  M.  Harmand  from  the  bail-bond  and 
delivered  the  said  Langlois  to  M.  Trottier  to  do  with  him  what 
shall  seem  to  him  best. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  Jean  Bte.  Lacroix. 

At  a  Court,  October  25,  1781. 
President,  Jean  Bte.  Lacroix.  Raphael  Gagne 
Pierre  Grandmont.  Jos.  Cesirre. 

Present. 
Jos.  Asselin,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Dubois,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant,  demanding  that  he  give  him 
proof  of  the  injury  that  the  plaintiff  did  him  in  not  keeping  the 
agreement,  which  they  had  made,  to  go  down  to  New  Orleans. 

The  defendant  answers  that  he  refused  forty  piastres  to  go  to 
New  Orleans,  offered  by  M.  Motard,  in  order  to  keep  the  engage- 
ment which  he  had  made  with'  the  plaintiff. 

The  Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  restore  to  the  plaintiff 
the  mare,  which  the  latter  had  given  him  in  advance,  deciding 
that  the  service,  which  he  had  had  from  the  said  mare,  would 
do  for  damages.  The  Court  decreed  that  the  plaintiff  shall 
be  free  to  engage  himself  to  another,  if  he  so  desires,  and  con- 
demned him  to  pay  all  the  costs. 

Jean  Bte.  Laurins  Plaintiff  Jos.  Dube  Defendant 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  six  hundred  pounds  of 
flour,  which  the  defendant  owes  the  plaintiff  for  a  horse  the 


io6  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

a  vendu  Sur  Laquelle  ditte  quantite  Le  demendeur  En  a  recue 
cinquante  Livres. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  quils  Etoient  Convenu  avec  Le  demen- 
deur de  Six  Cent  Livres  de  farine  ou  Cent  vingt  Livres  de  paux  de 
chevreuil  au  deffaut  de  farine. 

Le  demendeur  produit  trois  temoins  qui  disent  avoir  Entendu 
dire  au  deffendeur  quil  devoit  six  cent  Livres  de  farine  pour  un 
Cheval  quil  avoit  achet^  du  demendeur. 

nayant  point  de  preuve  ny  Pun  ni  Lautre  a  produire  La  Cour 

Les  a  prete  a  Serment  Et  Setant  refuse  I'un  a  Leur  Serment  La 

Cour  a  renvoye  Le  present  proses  ne  pouvant  Les  Condanner,  Et 

ont  Ete  condanne  Seulement  Lun  et  L'autre  a  payer  Les  fraix. 

Demendeur  Jos^  plante  Deffendeur  Jos^  vaudry 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  disant  que  L'ayant 
Engage  pour  chasser  En  decendant  a  la  N^^^  Orleans,  Et  quand 
concequence  il  auroit  vendu  bien  des  chose  quil  Luy  etoit  tres 
utile  maime  Jusqua  Son  mays,  Se  qui  Etoit  dune  grande  recourse 
pour  Luy,  Et  que  presentement  Le  deffendeur  Se  dedit  de  Ses 
Conventions  Se  qui  Luy  fait  un  tor  considerable  Et  demende  que 
led*  deffendeur  Soit  Condanne  a  Luy  payer  un  dedomagement. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  quil  a  averty  Le  demendeur  La  veille  du 
Jour  quil  devoit  partir  quil  ne  Luy  etoit  pas  possible  de  Continuer 
son  voyage. 

Le  demendeur  dit  quil  auroit  demende  au  Deffendeur  Cinq  Jour 
pour  finir  quelque  petit  ouvrage  quil  avoit  a  differante  personne  Et 
que  dans  Cette  intervale  il  auroit  demende  au  deffendeur  Si  il  Etoit 
bien  Sur  de  faire  Le  voyage  quils  etoit  Convenu  de  faire  a  quoy  il 
luy  a  tour  jour  repondu  quil  devoit  ce  croire  Engage  et  quil  parteroit 
En  Consequence  il  L'auroit  renvoye  plusieurs  ouvrage  quil  na  pa 
pu  finir,  et  a  vendu  ce  quil  avoit  icy  tant  qu'en  un  Canot  mays  Sel 
et  autre  chose  quil  Luy  Seroit  aujourdhuy  D'un  grand  Secour. 

La  Court  a  Condanner  Le  deffendeur  a  rembourser  au  de- 
'  mendeur  Soixante  Livres  En  Daree,  pour  dedomagement  Et  a 
payer  Les  fraix. 

La  Cour  est  ajourne  a  Jeudy  8.  gbre 

f.  saucier.  Clark  J  B  H  LaCroix 


CAHOKIA  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1781  107 

latter  sold  him,  of  which  said  quantity  the  plaintiff  has  received 
fifty  pounds. 

The  defendant  answers  that  he  had  agreed  with  the  plaintiff 
for  six  hundred  pounds  of  flour  or  one  hundred  and  twenty  pounds 
of  deer-skins,  in  default  of  flour. 

The  plaintiff  produces  three  witnesses,  who  say  that  they 
heard  the  defendant  say  that  he  owed  six  hundred  pounds  of 
flour  for  a  horse,  which  he  had  bought  of  the  plaintiff. 

Since  neither  has  proof  to  offer,  the  Court  put  them  to  oath ; 
and  since  each  refused  to  take  the  other's  oath,  the  Court  dis- 
missed the  present  cause,  not  being  able  to  pass  judgment, 
and  both  have  been  condemned  only  to  pay  the  costs. 

Jos.  Plante,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jos.  Vaudry,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  saying  that  the  latter  engaged 
him  to  hunt  while  going  down  to  New  Orleans,  and  that  in 
consequence  he  had  sold  many  of  his  goods,  which  were  very  useful 
to  him,  and  even  his  com,  which  was  a  great  resource  to  him, 
and  that  now  the  defendant  has  backed  out  of  his  agreement, 
which  does  the  plaintiff  a  considerable  injury  and  he  prays  that 
the  said  defendant  be  condemned  to  pay  him  damages. 

The  defendant  answers  that  he  informed  the  plaintiff  the 
evening  before  he  was  going  to  start  that  it  was  not  possible  for 
him  to  continue  his  journey. 

The  plaintiff  says  that  he  had  asked  the  defendant  for  five 
days  to  finish  some  little  jobs,  which  he  had  for  different  persons, 
and  that  during  this  interval  he  had  asked  the  defendant,  if  he 
was  very  sure  of  making  the  journey  which  they  had  agreed  to 
make,  to  which  the  latter  always  replied  that  he  should  consider 
himself  engaged  and  that  he  would  start.  In  consequence  he  had 
given  up  several  jobs,  which  he  could  not  finish,  and  sold 
what  he  had  here  as  well  as  in  a  canoe,  corn,  salt  and  other  things, 
which  would  be  of  great  assistance  to  him  to-day. 

The  Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  reimburse  the  plaintiff 
sixty  livres  in  kind  for  damages  and  to  pay  the  costs. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  November  8. 
F.^Saucier,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  Lacroix. 


io8  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

a  une  Cour  du  5  pbre  1781. 
President  G.  Blin  B*^  Dubuc 

B*^  Lacroix  pierre  Granmon 

B*®  saucier  Present 

Demendeur  AUG*    ange  Deffendeur  ch'^  Gratiot 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  Luy  rendre  Compte 
de  ce  que  feu  Dubois  Luy  doit  Comme  ayant  Eu  Ce  qui  a  restd 
aprds  La  mort  dud*  dubois. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  Lorque  L'on  a  Et^  pour  faire 
L^ancan  de  feu  dubois  qu'avec  L'aprobatioh  de  M^  Joseph 
Lepage  Juge  de  la  Cour  a  retirer  tous  Les  articles  qui  restoit  de 
ce  quil  avoit  vendu  a  feu  dubois,  et  que  le  reste  a  Et^  vendu  Et 
dont  La  vente  Doit  Etre  Entre  les  mains  de  M''  Ducharme  Comme 
ayant  Luy  meme  faire  faire  La  vente,  Et  demande  a  la  Cour  de 
Luy  nomer  un  Jour,  D'un  autre  Cour  afin  quil  produise  Les 
Compte  quil  a  Contre  Led*  Dubois,  nayant  point  Ete  prevenu 
de  Cette  affaire. 

La  Cour  a  accord^  au  S^  Charle  Gratiot,  de  paroitre,  a  La  Cour 
prochaine  Jeudy  8^^  du  cour*  aflSn  quil  produisse  Ses  Compte 
Suivant  sa  demande. 

a  une  meme  Court  il  a  Etd  Deffendu  a  Louis  Lem^  de  Se 
retablir  a  La  prairie  du  pont  Luy  ayant  Deja  Ete  deffendu. 
La  Cour  Est  ajourn^  a  Jeudy  8.  Qbre 
f.  saucier.  Clark  G.  Blin 

a  une  Cour*  du  8.  gbre. 
Pr^sd*  G.  Blin  J.  B*«  Dubuc 

J.  B*^  Lacroix  raph®^  Gagne 

p.  Granmon  Jos^  Cecire 

Present 
Demendeur  J.  B*®  Lacroix    Charle  Lefevre  Deffendeur 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  trois  haChe  quil 
Luy  a  donne  a  racomode.  Et  que  le  deffendeur  Luy  a  cassd  en 
racomodant,  disant  quil  ne  Doit  pas  payer  Le  racomodage. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  Si  Les  hache  ont  manqu^  par 
L'ouvrage  quil  a  fait  quil  ne  demende  rien,  mais  quelle  Sont  Cassd 
aillieur. 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1781  109 

At  a  Court,  November  5,  1781. 
President,  G.  Blin.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Bte.  LaCroix.  Pierre  Grandmont. 

Bte.  Saucier.  Present. 

Aug.  Angers,  Plaintiff, ""w.Ch.  Gratiot,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  in  order  that  he  render  him  an 
account  of  what  the  late  Dubois  owed  him,  since  he  had  had  the 
property,  which  remained  after  the  death  of  the  said  Dubois. 

The  defendant  answers  that  when  they  were  on  the  point  of 
holding  the  auction  of  the  goods  of  the  late  Dubois,  he  withdrew, 
with  the  approval  of  M.  Joseph  Lepage,  judge  of  the  Court,  all 
the  articles  remaining  of  those  which  he  had  sold  to  the  late 
Dubois,  and  that  the  rest  had  been  sold  and  that  the  proceeds 
of  the  sale  must  be  in  the  hands  of  M.  DuCharme,  since  he  had 
caused  the  sale  to  be  made.  He  prays  the  Court  to  name  a  day 
at  another  Court  that  he  may  produce  his  account  against  the 
said  Dubois,  since  he  was  not  forewarned  of  this  suit. 

The  Court  in  accordance  with  his  prayer  granted  Charles 
Gratiot  till  the  next  Court,  Thursday,  the  8th  of  the  present 
month,  to  appear  and  produce  his  account. 

At  the  same  Court  Louis  Lemay  was  for  bidden  to  settle  at 
Prairie  du  Pont,  as  it  had  been  already  forbidden  him  to  do. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  November  8. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 

At  a  Court,  November  8. 
President  G.  Blin.  J.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

J.  Bte.  LaCroix.  Raphael  Gagnd. 

P.  Grandmont.  Jos.  Cesirre. 

Present. 
J.  Bte.  Lacroix,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Charles  Lefevre,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  three  axes,  which  he  had 
given  him  to  mend,  and  which  the  defendant  broke  in  mending 
and  says  that  he  ought  not  to  pay  for  the  repairing. 

The  [defendant  answers  that  if  the  axes  were  spoiled  by 
the  work,  which  he  did,  he  would  not  demand  anything; 
but  that  they  broke  elsewhere. 


no  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

La  Cour  a  renvoyer  Le  present  proems  a  etre  decide  par  Des 
ouvrier  Et  ont  Condamn^  Les  dittes  partie  a  sen  raporter  a  leur 
decision,  Louvrier  ayant  visiter  louvrage  a  Dit  quelle  ne  valloit 
rien  et  quelle  ne  Devoit  pas  Etre  paye,  La  Cour  a  Condann^  Le 
deffendeur  a  payer  Les  fraix. 

AUG.  ANGE    Demendeur      ch.  Gratiot  Deffendeur 

Le  deffendeur  ayant  Ete  renvoy^  a  La  presente  Cour  pour 
produire  Ses  Compte  Contre  feu  dubois  Et  Les  ayant  produit  La 
Court  a  ordonne  au  demendeur  de  produire  Les  Siens  Et  a  prover 
Comme  La  farine  quil  a  retirer  Luy  appartient  et  a  Cette  Effest  a 
nomee  francois  saucier  pour  faire  Le  recouvrement  de  la  vente  de 
Ses  Effest  ainsi  que  la  farine  qui  reste  Etre  due  pour  ensuitte 
payer  a  qui  il  appartiendrie. 

B^^.  Lacroix  Demendeur    P.  Martin  Deffendeur 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  La  somme  de 
vingt  neuf  Livres  quil  Luy  doit  pour  L'ancan  de  L'acharette. 

Le  deffendeur  dit  avoir  paye  Les  vingt  neuf  Livres  a  M'". 
Gratiot  En  reglant  de  Compte  avec  luy. 

m^  Gratiot  ayant  produit  Ses  Compte  quil  avoit  regie  avec  le 
deffendeur  ou  il  n'est  point  Mention  dud^  payement. 

La  Cour  a  Condanne  Le  deffendeur  a  produire  un  recuet 
Comme  il  a  paye  Les  dit  vingt  neuf  Livres,  au  deffaut 
de  quoy  il  est  condanne  a  payer  au  demendeur  La  Ditte 
Somme. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  Jeudy  8  x^^^. 

f  saucier  Clar  G.  Blin 

a  une  Cour  du  15  gbre. 
Presd  G.  Blin  B*«  Saucier 

p.  Granmon  B*^  Dubuque 

Pres. 

une  requette  presente  par  m^  fr.  trottier,  disant  quayant  Et^ 
nome  tuteur  des  Enfans  de  feu  Lapierre,  quil  a  Exercer  Jusqu'a 
present  Cette  Charge,  Et  demende  a  en  Etre  decharge,  Et  que  la 
Cour  nome  un  autre  tuteur. 

La    Cour  a  acorde  a  M^  Fr  Trottier  de  Se  decharge  de  Sa 

1  See  previous  session. 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1781  iii 

The  Court  dismissed  the  present  suit  to  be  decided  by  work- 
men and  condemned  the  said  parties  to  refer  the  cause  to  their 
decision.  The  workmen  having  inspected  the  work  said  that 
the  axes  were  worth  nothing  and  that  they  ought  not  to  be 
paid  for.  The  Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay  the 
costs. 

Aug.  Angers,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Ch.  Gratiot,  Defendant. 

The  defendant,  having  been  dismissed  to  the  present  Court  to 
produce  his  accounts  against  the  late  Dubois,  has  brought  them. 
The  Court  ordered  the  plaintiff  to  produce  his  accounts  and  to 
prove  how  the  flour,  which  he  withdrew,  belonged  to  him, 
and  to  this  end  named  Francois  Saucier  to  make  the  recovery 
from  the  sale  of  his  goods  and  also  of  the  flour,  which  remains 
due,  in  order  afterwards  to^pay  it  to  whom  it  may  belong.^ 

B.  LaCroix,  Plaintiff,  'z;^.  P.  Martest,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  the  sum  of  twenty-nine 
livres,  which  he  owes  him  for  the  auction  of  the  cart. 

The  defendant  says  that  he  paid  the  twenty-nine  livres  to  M. 
Gratiot  in  settlement  of  accounts  with  him. 

M,  Gratiot  produced  the  accounts,  which  he  had  settled  with 
the  defendant,  and  there  is  no  mention  of  the  said  payment. 

The  Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  produce  a  receipt 
showing  that  he  had  paid  the  said  twenty-nine  livres^  in  default  of 
which  he  is  condemned  to  pay  the  plaintiff  the  said  sum. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  December  8. 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 

At  a  Court,  November  15. 
President,  G.  Blin.  Bte.  Saucier. 

P.  Grandmont.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Present. 

A  petition  presented  by  M.  Fr.  Trottier,  in  which  he  says  that 
he  was  named  guardian  of  the  children  of  the  late  Lapierre  and 
has  exercised  this  charge  up  to  the  present;  and  now  he  re- 
quests that  he  be  relieved  and  that  the  Court  name  another 
guardian. 

The  Court  granted  that  M.  Fr.  Trottier  be  relieved  of  his 


112  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

tutelle  En  Consequence  EUe  a  ordonn^  quil  Soit  fait  un  assemble 
de  parens  Et  damis  pour  Le  reglement  des  Compte,  ainsi  que 
pour  La  nomination  dun  nouvaux  tuteur. 

f  saucier  dark,  G.  Blin 

a  une  Cour  du  6  X^^^  1781. 
presidant  G  Blin  raphle  Gagn^ 

J.  B*^  Lacroix  B*^  Dubuc 

pierre  Gramon  Jos^  Cecire 

pres*. 
Les  Compte  due  par  feu  Jos^  metote  ont  Ete  prdsent^  a  la 
Cour.  il  a  Et^  ordonne  que  fr.  Saucier  face  Le  recouvrement  de 
Son  ancan  ancan  [sic]   Et  payer  Les   dits  Compte,  qui  Seront 
raport^  En  Cour  pour  Etre  aprouv^. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  jeudy  3.  de  Janvier. 
F.  saucier  dark  G.  Blin 

a  une  Cour  du  10^®  Janvier  1782. 
president  george  blin  raphael  gagn^ 

J.  B*®  Lacroix  pierre  grandmont 

B*®  Saucier  Joseph  Cecirre 

B*^  Dubuc  present 

demendeur  Isaac  levy  defendeur  michel  butau 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  le  defFendeur  disant  que  layant  traite 
pour  une  maladie  moyennant  la  Somme  de  quatre  cent  livres  et 
quappres  un  certain  temp  le  deffendeur  luy  at  assure  quil  ne 
Sentoit  plus  aucuns  Simptomes  de  Sa  maladie  il  a  cesse  de  le 
Soigner  et  luy  demandant  Son  payement  par  la  Suitte  le  deffend- 
eur  luy  a  refuse  disant  quil  ne  lavoit  pas  gueris  entierement. 

B*®  dumais  appres  avoir  fait  Serment  de  dire  la  verite  Sur  les 
Conv^tion  entre  le  demandeur  et  le  ddfifendeur  at  assurre  que  le 
demendeur  devoit  parfaitement  guerir  le  deffendeur  et  quil  at 
entendu  dire  au  Deffendeur  quil  netoit  pas  guerit  quil  netoit  que 
Seulement  Soulage. 

Le  deffendeur  dit  que  le  demandeur  etoit  oblige  de  le  guerir 
parfaitement  et  quil  ne  Sest  point  trouve  et  ne  Se  trouve  point 
gudrit  quil  a  Semplement  Senti  quelques  Soulagements  par  les 
premier  traitement  Du  demendeur. 


COURT  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1781  113 

guardianship;  and  in  consequence  ordered  that  there  be  held  an 
assembly  of  relatives  and  friends  for  the  settlement  of  accounts 
and  the  nomination  of  a  new  guardian. 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 

At  a  Court,  December  6,  1781. 
President  G.  Blin.  Raphael  Gagnd. 

Jean  Bte.  Lacroix.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Pierre  Grandmont.  Joseph  Cesirre. 

Present. 
The  accounts  due  by  the  late  Jos.  Methot  have  been  presented 
to  the  Court.     It  was  decreed  that  Fr.  Saucier  make  the  recovery 
by  auction  and  pay  the  said  accounts,  which  shall  be  reported  in 
Court  to  be  approved. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  January  3. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk,  G.  Blin. 

At  a  Court,  January  10,  1782. 
President,  George  Blin.  Raphael  Gagn^. 

J.  Bte.  LaCroix.       "  Pierre  Grandmont. 

Bte.  Saucier.  Joseph  Cesirre. 

Bte.  Dubuque.  Present. 

Isaac  Levy,  Plaintifif,  vs.  Michel  Buteau,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  saying  that  he  treated  the 
defendant  for  a  sickness  for  the  sum  of  four  hundred  livres  and 
after  some  time  the  defendant  assured  him  that  he  no  longer  felt 
any  symptoms  of  his  sickness.  He  ceased  caring  for  him  and 
afterwards,  when  he  asked  for  his  pay,  the  defendant  refused, 
saying  that  he  had  not  cured  him  entirely. 

Bte.  Dumay,  after  having  made  oath  to  tell  the  truth  concern- 
ing the  agreement  between  the  plaintiff  and  the  defendant,  affirmed 
that  the  plaintiff  was  bound  to  cure  perfectly  the  defendant  and 
that  he  heard  the  defendant  say  that  he  was  not  cured,  but  only 
relieved. 

The  defendant  says  that  the  plaintiff  was  obliged  to  cure  him 
perfectly  and  that  he  was  not  and  is  not  cured;  that  he  only 
felt  some  relief  from  the  first  treatment  of  the  plaintiff. 

Augustin  Angers,  after  having  made  oath  to  tell  the  truth 


114  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

augustin  angers  appres  avoir  fait  Serment  de  dire  la  verite  Selon 
Ses  Connoissances  dit  que  le  deffendeur  etoit  dans  les  desseins 
daller  aux  Kas  Se  faire  Soigner  et  quil  auroit  dit  que  le  demandeur 
lavoit  arrete  disant  quil  etoit  capable  de  le  guerir  et  quil  luy  auroit 
conseille  de  Se  mettre  entre  les  mains  du  demendeur.  et  que  quelque 
temps  appres.  ay  ant  demande  au  deffendeur  letat  de  Sa  maladie  il 
auroit  repondu  quil  alloit  tres  bien.  et  quen  suitte  de  le  temps,  le 
deffendeur  luy  auroit  dit  quil  etoit  malade.  et  que  le  demandeur 
lessoit  de  le  Soigner. 

le  deffendeur  at  declare  par  Serment  n'avoir  jamais  Connti 
aucunes  femmes  depuis  le  premier  temps  que  le  demandeur  lat 
Soigne  jusqua  ce  que  jour. 

la  Cour  at  Condamne  le  demendeur  de  Continuer  de  Soigner 
le  deffendeur  jusqu'a  ce  quil  soit  guerit  Sous  Condition  que  le 
deffendeur  Se  Comporterat  Conformement  a  Ses  ordonnances  et 
ne  feras  rien  qui  puisse  estre  nisible  au  medicaments  du  demand- 
eur, Sous  peine  de  payer  la  Somme  demande  par  le  demandeur  et 
destre  abandonne  de  luy. 

la  Cour  a  Condanne  le  deffendeur  de  payer  la  Somme  de  Cent 
Seize  livre  quinze  Sols  que  le  demandeur  a  produit  Selon  Son 
Compte  Courrant. 

la  Cour  a  Condanne  le  demandeur  a  payer  touts  les  fraix  de 
justice. 

la  Cour  est  ajourne  au  7"'^  febrier 
f.  saucier  dark  G.  Blin 

a  une  Cour  du  28  Janvier  1782. 
president  G  Blin  Jn  B*^  Saucier 

Jn  B*^  Lacroix  Jn  B*^  Dubuc 

Demendeur  Joseph  Motar  Defendeur  augu*.  ange 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  Savoir  Le  Sujet 

pour  Lequel  il  a  defendu  au  Sieur  ducharme  de  Le  payer  Et  de 

regler  Ses  Compte  avec  Luy. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  Si  il  La  fait  Ce  na  Ete  que  parceque 

Le  demendeur  Luy  a  Saisi  un  Canot  dans  Lequelle  il  devoit 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1782        115 

according  to  his  knowledge,  says  that  the  defendant  was  intending 
to  go  to  Kaskaskia  to  be  attended,  and  that  he  had  said  that  the 
plaintiff  had  stopped  him,  saying  that  he  was  capable  of  curing 
him;  and  that  he  [Angers]  had  advised  him  to  put  himself 
under  the  care  of  the  plaintiff;  that  some  time  afterwards,  when 
he  asked  the  defendant  about  the  sickness,  he  answered  that  he 
was  getting  along  very  well ;  but  later  the  defendant  had  told 
him  that  he  was  sick  and  that  the  plaintiff  had  ceased  attending 
him. 

The  defendant  declared  on  oath  that  he  had  not  known  any 
women  from  the  time  the  plaintiff  began  taking  care  of  him  up 
to  the  present  time. 

The  Court  condemned  the  plaintiff  to  continue  attending 
the  defendant  until  he  should  be  cured,  on  condition  that 
the  defendant  acts  according  to  orders  and  does  nothing  that 
can  counteract  the  medicines  of  the  plaintiff,  under  penalty 
of  paying  the  sum  demanded  and  of  being  abandoned  by 
him. 

The  Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay  the  sum 
of  one  hundred  and  sixteen  livres  fifteen  sols,  a  bill  for  which 
in  accordance  with  his  current  account  the  plaintiff  has  pro- 
duced. 

The  Court  condemned  the  plaintiff  to  pay  all  the  costs  of 
justice. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  February  7. 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 

At  a  Court,  January  28,  1782. 
President,  G.  Blin.  Jn.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Jn.  Bte.  LaCroix.  Jn.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Present. 

Joseph  Motard,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Aug.  Angers,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  that  he  may  know  the  reason 
why  the  latter  has  forbidden  M.  DuCharme  to  pay  him  and  to 
settle  his  accounts  with  him. 

The  defendant  answers  that  if  he  did  it,  it  was  only  because 
the  plaintiff  seized  a  canoe  in  which  he  was  going  away,  saying 


ii6  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

partir  disant  quil  Luy  devoit  Se  que  Le  Deffendeur  ny  et  offre  de 
Le  prouver. 

Le  demendeur  repond  quayant  vendu  Soixante  pot  de  tafia  a 
raison  de  deux  piastres  Le  pot  Sur  Laquelle  ditte  quantite  Le 
Sieur  Ducharme  Luy  En  a  pay^  Cinquant,e  pot  Comme  ayant  re- 
pondu  de  Le  faire,  Et  que  Comme  Le  deffendeur  Se  trouvoit 
redevoir  au  demendeur  vingt  piastre  pour  Les  dix  pot  restant,  et 
quapres  Luy  avoir  demend^  plusieurs  fois  il  auroit  refuse  de  le 
Satisfaire  il  auroit  par  ordre  de  m^  Le  Commandant  de  st  Louis 
de  faire  aretter  Le  Canot  du  deffendeur  Seulement  pour  Jusqua  ce 
quelque  Juge  En  decide  Et  a  produit  Son  Compte  par  Lequel  Le 
d*  deffendeur  Luy  est  redevable  de  la  Somme  de  Cent  Livres. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  dans  Laffaire  presente  avec  Le  de- 
mendeur il  netoit  point  Convenu  d'aucume  quantite  de  tafia  que 
Leur  Convention  Etoit  d'une  Demy  Barique  pour  Le  prix  de  Cinq 
Cent  Livres  Et  quil  n'etoit  Convenu  aucunement  d'aucun  prix 
pour  Le  pot. 

Le  demendeur  repond  que  Si  Lusse  promit  soixante  pot  de 
tafia  au  deffendeur  pour  une  Demi  Barique  il  n'auroit  pas  pre- 
sence du  deffendeur  valter  Led*  tierson  qui  Contenoit  Soixante 
pot  Et  que  Le  deffendeur  Si  Seroit  oposer  Si  lusse  entendu  avoir 
Soixante  pot  de  tafia  pour  Cinquante. 

Le  deffendeur  offre  antoine  Lamarche  pour  t^moin  de  Leur 
Convention. 

antoine  Lamarche  ayant  paru  a  pT6t6  Serment  Sur  Le  S* 
Evangille  De  repondre  au  question  qu'on  Luy  feroit,  et  a  dit  quil 
n'a  d'autre  Connoissance  que  d'avoir  Entendu  dire  par  m^  mo- 
tar  quil  Donneroit  au  S'^  angd  une  Demy  Barique  de  tafia  pour  La 
quantity  de  Cent  piastre. 

Le  demendeur  a  pret6  Serment  Sur  Son  Compte. 

apres  avoir  murement  Examind  Les  demendes  Et  deffences 
vue  Le  t^moins  Et  Sa  Declaration  La  Cour  a  Condann^  Le  deffen- 
deur a  payer  au  demendeur  Le  Surplus  des  Cinquante  pot  de 
tafia  a  raison  de  deux  piastre  Le  pot  qui  Ce  Sont  trouvd  dans  Le  feu 
quil  a  regue  du  demendeur,  Comme  L'ayant  valte  En  La  presence 
du  Deffendeur  et  Le  Deffendeur  a  payer  Les  fraix  de  Justice. 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1782        117 

that  the  defendant  was  in  debt  to  him,  which  the  defendant  denies 
and  offers  to  prove. 

The  plaintiff  answers  that  he  sold  sixty  jugs  of  tafia  at  two 
piastres  the  jug  and  that  M.  DuCharme  paid  him  for  fifty  jugs  of 
this,  for  which  he  had  held  himself  responsible;  and  since  the 
defendant  was  indebted  to  the  plaintiff  twenty  piastres  for  the  ten 
remaining  jugs  and  had  refused  to  pay  after  many  demands,  he 
had,  by  order  of  the  'commandant  of  St.  Louis,  caused  the 
seizure  of  the  defendant's  canoe  only  until  some  judge  should 
decide,  and  he  produced  his  account  according  to  which  the 
defendant  is  indebted  to  him  for  the  sum  of  one  hundred  livres. 

The  defendant  answers  that  in  the  present  affair  with  the 
plaintiff  there  was  no  agreement  on  any  quantity  of  tafia,  that 
their  agreement  was  for  a  half-cask  at  five  hundred  livres,  and 
that  there  was  no  agreement  on  any  price  per  jug. 

The  plaintiff  answers  that  if  he  had  promised  the  defendant 
sixty  jugs  of  tafia  for  a  half-cask  he  would  not  in  the  presence 
of  the  defendant  have  measured  [?]  the  said  barrel,  which  con- 
tained sixty  jugs ;  and  that  the  defendant  should  have  objected 
thereto,  if  he  had  understood  that  he  was  receiving  sixty  jugs 
instead  of  fifty. 

The  defendant  presents  Antoine  Lamarche  as  a  witness  of 
their  agreement. 

Antoine  Lamarche  appeared  and  made  oath  on  the  Holy 
Gospels  to  answer  the  question,  which  is  put  to  him,  and  said  that 
he  had  no  other  knowledge  than  that  he  had  heard  M.  Motard 
say  that  he  was  giving  M.  Angers  a  half-cask  of  tafia  for  a  him- 
dred  piastres. 

The  plaintiff  made  oath  to  his  account. 

After  having  carefully  examined  the  prayers  and  the  defences 
and  considering  the  witness  and  his  testimony,  the  Court  con- 
demned the  defendant  to  pay  the  plaintiff  for  the  surplus  above 
the  fifty  jugs  of  tafia,  which  were  in  the  consignment  of  firewater 
which  he  received  from  the  plaintiff,  at  the  rate  of  two  dollars  a 
jug,  since  it  was  measured  [  ?]  in  the  presence  of  the  defendant, 
and  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay  the  costs  of  justice. 


ii8  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

Demendeur  Isaac  Levy  Deffendeur  michel  butau 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  disant  que  La  Cour 
Derniere  il  auroit  Ete  Condann^  de  Continuer  a  medicamenter  Le 
deffendeur  Jusqu'a  Sa  parfaite  guerison  pour  parvenir  au  paye- 
ment  que  Le  deffendeur  Est  oblige  a  Luy  donner,  mais  il  prouve 
que  Le  deffendeur  na  pas  Suivie  Ses  ordonnance  ni  meme  prise 
Les  remedes  quil  Luy  a  donne  puisq'un  Jour  il  dit  Luy  avoir  don- 
n^  Soixante  pilule  pour  En  prendre  Sept  Le  premier  Jour  Et  a  au- 
guemender  d'une  tout  Les  Jour,  Jusque  La  fin  mais  Le  Demen- 
deur Dit  que  Le  Lendemain  ayant  Et^  Le  voir,  il  Luy  a  demend^ 
Si  il  En  avoit  prix  Se  Jour  La,  Le  deffendeur  Luy  a  repondu  que 
non  et  quil  ne  Savoit  pas  de  quoy  Etoit  devenu  Les  ditte  pilule  quil 
Croyoit  que  Les  Enfans  de  la  maison  Les  avoit  perdu.  Et  que 
Le  Sur  Lendemain  il  y  auroit  Encore  retourne,  Luy  en  report^ 
quinze  autre  Des  meme  pilule  Et  a  recommander  au  S^  B*®  alary 
de  faire  attention  Si  Le  dit  deffendeur  ne  Le  trompoit  point  Dans 
Les  remedes  quil  Luy  donnoit  Et  L'apres  midy  Le  deffendeur  a 
dit  au  demendeur,  apres  Luy  avoir  dit  que  Les  Enfans  avoit  gas- 
piller  Les  ditte  Soixante  Et  Sept  pillule  quil  Les  avoit  toute  prise 
chose  inposible  que  Le  demendeur  represente,  parceque  Cetoit 
asse  pour  Le  faire  mourir,  Et  m'^^  B*^  alary  ayant  paru  a  dit  que 
Led*  deffendeur  na  pas  voulu  prendre  aucune  des  ditte  pilule  que 
Le  demendeur  avoit  recommende  De  Luy  faire  prendre. 

Le  deffendeur  ayant  paru  a  dit  quil  avoit  prix  toute  Les  pilule 
que  Le  demendeur  Luy  a  a  [sic]  donn^  que  voyant  que  Les  remede 
ne  Le  guerissoit  pas  aussi  vite  quil  L'auroit  voulu  quil  Les  a  toute 
prise  dans  Deux  Jour. 

La  Cour  a  Condann^  Le  deffendeur  a  payer  au  demendeur 
Le  prix  quil  etoit  Convenu  de  luy  donner  Comme  n'ayant  pas 
Suivie  Ses  ordonnances,  anisi  que  tous  Les  fraix. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  Jeudy  7.  fevrier. 
fr.  saucier,  dark.  G.  Blin. 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1782        119 

Isaac  Levy,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Michel  Buteau,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant,  saying  that  at  the  last  Court 
he  had  been  condemned  to  continue  to  treat  the  defendant  until 
his  perfect  cure  in  order  to  obtain  the  payment,  which  the 
defendant  was  obliged  to  give  him;  but  he  proves  that  the 
defendant  has  not  followed  his  prescriptions  nor  even  taken  the 
remedies,  which  he  gave  him;  for,  he  says,  he  gave  him  one  day 
sixty  pills,  seven  of  which  he  was  to  take  the  first  day  and  to 
increase  the  number  by  one  each  succeeding  day  until  all  were 
taken;  but  the  plaintiff  says  that  on  the  next  day  he  went  to 
see  the  defendant  and  asked  if  he  had  taken  the  pills  that  day, 
and  the  defendant  answered,  ''No",  and  said  that  he  did  not 
know  what  had  become  of  the  said  pills;  but  that  he  believed 
that  the  children  of  the  house  had  lost  them.  The  plaintiff 
further  says  that  on  the  following  day  he  returned  and  brought 
fifteen  more  of  the  same  pills;  and  he  requested  M.  Bte.  Alarie  to 
watch  and  see  if  the  said  defendant  did  not  deceive  him  about 
the  medicine  he  had  given  him;  and  in  the  afternoon  the 
defendant  said  to  the  plaintiff,  after  having  told  him  that  the  chil- 
dren had  thrown  away  the  said  sixty-seven  pills,  that  he  had 
taken  them  all,  which  is  impossible,  the  plaintiff  maintains, 
because  that  was  enough  to  kill  him.  Madame  Bte.  Alary 
appeared  and  said  that  the  defendant  aforesaid  did  not  wish  to 
take  any  of  the  said  pills,  which  the  plaintiff  charged  him  to 
take. 

The  defendant  appeared  and  said  that  he  had  taken  all  the 
pills  that  the  plaintiff  gave  him;  but  since  the  remedies  did  not 
cure  him  as  quickly  as  he  had  wished,  he  took  them  all  in  two 
days. 

The  Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay  to  the  plaintiff 
the  price  which  he  had  agreed  to  give  him,  since  he  has  not  fol- 
lowed the  prescriptions,  and  also  to  pay  the  costs. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  February  7. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 


I20  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  7  fevrier  1782. 
President  G.  Blin  raph.  Gagne 

B*e  Saucier  J°  B^^  dubuc 

Pres^ 
G.  Blin  repr^sente  a  la  Cour  que  Le  nom6  pierre  Lafleur  ayant 
fait  Chanter  une  Grande  messe  par  M^  Gibeaute,  il  Luy  auroit 
demende  plusieurs  fois  de  Satisfaire  a  La  fabrique  Se  quil  a  refus^ 
de  faire.  En  Consequence  il  demende  de  faire  Saisir  quelq'un  de 
Ses  meubles  pour  Jusqu'a  La  Conqurence  de  ce  quil  doit. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  que  Le  nomd  pierre  Lafleur  Soit  assin^  a 
La  Cour  prochaine  pour  repondre  a  la  plainte  porte  Contre  Luy. 
La  Cour  Est  ajourn^  au  7  mars. 

f.  Saucier.  Clark 

a  une  Cour  du  21  fevrier  1782. 
President  G.  Blin  Jos^  Cecire. 

p.  Granmon  B*^  Saucier. 

J.  B*^  Lacroix  B*®  Dubuque. 

Present 
Jean  B*®  Lacroix  a  produit  a  la  Cour  Le  reglement  du 
Compte  de  la  Succession  de  feu  Jean  B*^  amelin  qui  a  et^  aprouv^ 
ainsi  que  Les  autre  papier  Dont  il  Etoit  Chargd  Comme  ayant 
Ete  nom^  par  Laditte  Cour  de  regler  Laditte  Succession.  Et  Les 
dit  papier  ont  Et^  remis  au  Gref. 

Le  Sieur  ant  Girardin  de  La  part  de  madame  veuve  merci^.  a 
fait  demende  En  Cour  de  faire  faire  invantaire  de  tous  Ses  Biens 
pour  regler  avec  Ses  mineurs. 

La  Cour  a  accorde  a  M*^®  mercid  Suivant  sa  demende. 
a  une  meme  Cour  pierre  roy  a  prdsente  une  requette  a  la  Cour 
pour  quil  Soit  nome  un  tuteur  au  mineurs  mitote 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  quil  Soit  fait  une  Assemble  de  parens  Et 
damis  pour  L'elextion  d'un  tuteur  au  Susdit  mineurs,  ainsi  que 
pour  le  reglement  de  Leur  Succession. 

a  une  meme  Cour  philipe  Gervais  ayant  obtenu  une  saisi  Sur 
Soixante    Gerbe   de  ble  appartinant  a  Glaude  Gagne  pour  une 

1  The  vestry-board  was  composed  of  church  wardens  elected  by  the  parish  to  take  charge 
of  the  temporal  affairs  of  the  church. 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1782       121 

At  a  Court,  February  7,  1782. 
President,  G.  Blin.  Raphael  Gagne. 

Bte.  Saucier.  Jean  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Present. 
G.  Blin  shows  the  Court  that  the  named  Pierre  Lafleur 
had  had  a  high  mass  sung  by  M.  Gibault,  and  that  he  had  asked 
the  latter  several  times  to  pay  the  vestry-board,^  which  the  latter 
refused  to  do.  Therefore  he  prays  that  some  of  his  movables, 
up  to  the  equivalent  of  what  he  owes,  be  attached. 

The  Court  ordered  that  the  named  Pierre  Lafleur  be  sum- 
moned to  the  next  Court  to  answer  the  complaint  brought  against 
him. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  March  7. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk. 

At  a  Court,  February  21,  1782. 
President,  G.  Blin.  Jos.  Cesirre. 

P.  Grandmont.  Bte.  Saucier. 

J.  Bte.  Lacroix.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Present. 
Jean  Bte.  Lacroix  brought  into  Court  the  settlement  of  the 
account  of  the  estate  of  the  late  Jean  Bte.  Hamelin,  which  was 
approved,  and  also  the  other  papers  with  which  he  was  intrusted, 
as  he  was  named  by  the  said  Court  to  settle  the  said  estate.  And 
the  said  papers  were  filed  in  the  clerk's  office. 

M.  Ant.  Girardin  on  behalf  of  Madame  Mercier,  widow,  made 
prayer  in  Court  to  have  an  inventory  made  of  all  her  goods  in 
order  to  settle  with  her  minor  heirs. 

The  Court  granted  the  request  of  Madame  Mercier. 
At  the  same  Court  Pierre  Roy  presented  a  petition  to  the 
Court  in  order  that  there  be  named  a  guardian  for  the  minors 
Methot. 

The  Court  decreed  that  there  be  held  an  assembly  of  relatives 
and  friends  for  the  election  of  a  guardian  for  the  above  mentioned 
minors,  and  also  for  the  settlement  of  their  estate. 

At  the  same  Court  Philippe  Gervais,  who  has  obtained  a  writ 
of  seizure  on  sixty  sheaves  of  wheat  belonging  to  Claude  Gagnd 


122  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Somme  de  Soixante  Et  quinze  Livres  quil  Luy.     Et  demendd 
a  La  Cour  d'ans  faire  faire  La  vente. 

La  Cour  a  accord^  au  S^  Gervais  La  vente  du  Ble  suivant  sa 
demende. 

fr.  Saucier  a  demende  a  la  Cour  quil  Luy  Soit  permis  de  faire 
vendre  Environ  deux  tombre  de  mays  appartenant  a  Glaude 
Gagn^  pour  Satisfaire  a  une  Somme  de  cent  soixante  et  trois  Livres 
quil  est  due  par  son  Billet. 

La  Cour  a  accorde  a  fr.  Saucier  quil  soit  fait  Suivant  sa  de- 
mende. 

fr.  Saucier  a  produit  En  cour  Le  reglement  des  Compte  de  la 
Succession  de  feu  Joseph  Metote,  qui  ont  Etd  aprouve. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  7  de  mars, 
fr  saucier  Clark  G  Blin 

a  une  Cour  du  7^^  mars  1782. 
President  G.  Blin.  Jos^  Cecire 

p.  Granmon  B*^  Saucier 

raphael  Gagne  B*^  Dubuc 

Present 

Demendeur  Louis  trottier     Deffendeur  J"  B*^  Lacroix 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  le  deffendeur  pour  un  Cochon  quil  Luy 
a  Ete  tu^  Dans  Les  Champs  Et  demende  quil  luy  Soit  paye  ayant 
passe  par  Sa  Cloture,  Suivant  La  declaration  de  M^  BauUieu  qui 
En  a  fait  La  visite.  Et  qui  declare  que  Les  d*  pourceau  ont  passe 
Sa  cloture. 

[Certificate  attached]  Je  Soussigne  Sertifie  a  tons  quil  appar- 
tiendra  qu'ayant  Et^  Envoye  par  le  Sindic  faire  La  visite  des  Clo- 
ture, que  J'auray  trouvd  un  pieux  de  Casse  dans  La  Cloture  de 
Monsieur  Lepage  Et  qu'en  presense  de  deux  temoins  Je  ne  me 
Suis  point  aper^u  quil  y  aye  passe  auq'un  animaux  Et  quensuite 
nous  aurions  trouve  une  Breche  a  Celle  de  m^  Lacroix  nous  nous 
Sommes  aper^u  quil  y  avoit  passe  Des  pour^eu,  Et  avons  aussi  vue 

1  The  certificate  is  stitched  to  the  page  of  the  Record. 

2  From  the  earhest  times  of  the  French  regime  the  inhabitants  elected  a  syndic  to  look 
after  the  commons  and  common  field.  This  officer  was  also  the  legal  representative  of  the 
community  on  all  occasions.  The  villages  of  France  had  a  similar  officer. — Babeau,  H., 
Les  assemblees  generales  des  communautes  d'habilants  en  France,  146  et  seq.  Babeau,  A., 
Le  village  sous  I'ancien  rlgimc,  ch.  iii. 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1782  123 

for  a  sum  of  seventy-five  livres^  which  the  latter  owes  him,  prays 
the  Court  to  have  the  sale  made  thereof. 

The  Court  granted  to  M.  Gervais  the  sale  of  the  wheat  accord- 
ing to  his  prayer. 

Fr.  Saucier  prayed  the  Court  to  permit  him  to  have  sold  about 
two  wagon  loads  of  corn  belonging  to  Claude  Gagne  to  satisfy 
the  sum  of  one  hundred  and  sixty-three  livres  which  is  due  on  his 
note. 

The  Court  granted  to  Fr.  Saucier  that  it  be  done  according 
to  his  prayer. 

Fr.  Saucier  produced  in  Court  the  settlement  of  the  accounts 
of  the  estate  of  the  late  Joseph  Methot,  and  it  was  approved. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  March  7. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 

At  a  Court,  March  7,  1782. 
President,  G.  Blin.  Jos.  Cesirre. 

P.  Grandmont.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Raphael  Gagn^  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Present. 
Louis  Trottier,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  his  pig,  which  was  killed 
in  the  fields,  and  demands  that  he  be  paid  for  it,  since  it  passed 
through  the  defendant's  fence  according  to  the  affidavit  of  M. 
Beaulieu,  who  made  the  inspection  and  declares  that  the  said 
pigs  passed  through  the  defendant's  fence. 

[Certificate  attached^]  I,  the  undersigned,  certify  to  all  whom 
it  may  concern  that  when  I  was  sent  by  the  syndic^  to  inspect 
the  fences,  I  found  a  stake  broken  in  the  fence  of  M.  Lepage  and, 
in  the  presence  of  two  witnesses,  I  have  not  seen  any  animals 
pass  through  there;  and  afterwards  we  found  a  break  in  M.  La- 
Croix's  fence  and  saw  that  some  pigs  had  passed  through  it;  and 
we  also  saw  a  broken  stake  in  Louis  Trottier's  fence,  but  up 
to  that  time  nothing  had  passed  through  there.  This  I  declare 
to  be  the  truth  and  have  signed  the  present  certificate  to  serve 
in  case  of  need.    At  Cahokia,  March  7,  1782. 

Beaulieu. 


124         ILLINOIS  Historical  collections 

un  pieux  Casse  a  la  Cloture  de  louis  trottier  ou  Jusqua  Lors  il  ny 
avoit  Encore  rein  passe  Ce  que  Je  declare  veritable  Et  a  Sign^ 
Le  present  pour  Servir  au  Besoin  Sera  aux  Cah6s  le  7  mars  1782. 

beaulieu 

Le  deffendeur  repont  que  Les  temoins  qui  Sertifie  que  le  Cochon 
a  pass^  par  Sa  cloture  q'un  en  fasse  Serment,  quil  ^e  Condanne  a 
Le  payer  puisquil  y  avoit  ce  jour  La  plusieur  Breche  aux  cloture. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  q'un  Des  temoins  qui  declare  que  Les  pour- 
ceaux  ont  passe  par  La  Cloture  de  d*  Lacroix  En  fasse  Serment 
Et  Le  deffendeur  alors  Sera  Condanne  a  payer  Le  d*  Cochon  au 
demendeur  Et  Les  fraix. 

a  une  meme  Cour  m^  motar  Expose  a  la  Cour  que  Dans  une 
affaire  quil  a  eu  avec  Le  Sieur  ange  Et  qui  auroit  Ete  Condanne 
par  laditte  De  luy  payer  une  Somme  Suivant  Son  Compte  il 
auroit  Jusqu'a  present  attendu  led*  payement  led*  Sieur  motar 
represente  aussi  que  la  Cour  Luy  ayant  ordonne  de  ramener  un 
Canot  quil  avoit  fait  Saisir  appartinan  audit  ange  a  S*  Louis,  il 
auroit  obei  aux  ordres  qui  Luy  ont  Et^  present  a  ce  Sujet. 

Mais  Comme  Led*  ange  Se  trouve  apsent  il  Demende  a  la 
Cour  de  faire  vendre  son  d*  Canot  pour  Satisfaire  a  ce  que  led* 
ange  Luy  doit. 

La  Cour  a  accorde  a  m^  motar  La  vente  du  d*  Canot,  moy- 
enant  que  Se  Sera  a  La  veille  de  Son  depart,  Esperant  que  led* 
ang6  pouroit  venir  avant  ce  tems. 

La  Cour  Et  [sic]  ajourne  Jeudy  4  avril. 

f  saucier  Clark  G  Blin 

a  une  Cour  du  8  de  mars  1782. 
President  Geo.  Blin  Jn  B*®  dubuque 

p.  Granmon  Jn  B*^  Saucier 

raph.  Gagne  Josh^  Cecire 

Present 

Le  Sieur  Jean  B*®  Lacroix  presente  une  requette  a  la  Cour  par 
Laquelle  il  demende  une  permission  pour  faire  La  traitte  avec 
Les  Sauvages  qui  viendront  ches  Luy.  au  Condition  que  toutte 
Les  viandes,  Suif  huile  dours  et  paux  de  Chevruil  quil  traittera 
apres  Sa  provision  faitte  dans  cedder  aux  Citoyens  de  ce  Village 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1782  125 

The  defendant  answers  by  requesting  that,  since  there  were 
several  breaks  in  the  fence  on  that  day,  one  of  the  witnesses,  who 
certify  that  the  pig  passed  through  his  fence,  should  make  oath, 
and  he  will  accept  judgment  to  pay  for  the  pig. 

The  Court  decreed  that  one  of  the  witnesses,  who  declare  that 
the  pigs  passed  through  the  fence  of  the  said  LaCroix,  should 
make  oath  thereto,  and  the  defendant  will  then  be  condemned 
to  pay  the  plaintiff  for  the  said  pig  and  the  costs. 

At  the  same  Court  M.  Motard  shows  the  Court  that  in  the 
cause,  which  he  had  with  M.  Angers  and  in  which  the  latter  had 
been  condemned  by  the  said  Court  to  pay  him  the  sum 
according  to  his  account,  he  had  up  to  the  present  waited  for  the 
said  payment.  M.  Motard  also  shows  that  the  Court  decreed 
that  he  should  bring  back  a  canoe  belonging  to  the  said  Angers  of 
which  he  had  made  seizure  at  St.  Louis,  and  that  he  had  obeyed 
the  orders  which  were  given  him  on  this  subject. 

But  since  the  said  Angers  is  absent,  he  prays  the  Court  to 
have  his  canoe  sold  to  satisfy  the  debt,  which  the  said  Angers 
owes  him. 

The  Court  granted  to  M.  Motard  the  sale  of  the  said  canoe 
on  condition  that  the  sale  shall  be  made  on  the  evening  of  his 
departure,  as  they  hope  that  the  said  Angers  may  return  before 
that  time. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  April  4. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 

At  a  Court,  March  8,  1782. 
President,  Geo.  Blin.  Jean  Bte.  Dubuque. 

P.  Grandmont.  Jean  Bte.  Saucier. 

Raph.  Gagnd.  Jos.  Cesirre 

Present. 
M.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix  presents  a  petition  to  the  Court  in  which 
he  requests  a  permit  to  trade  with  the  savages,  who  shall  come 
to  his  house,  on'  condition  that  all  meats,  tallow,  bears'  oil 
and  deer-skins,  which  he  shall  receive  in  trade,  after  making  pro- 
vision for  himself,  he  will  sell  to  the  citizens  of  this  village  at  a 


126  ILLINOIS'HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  un  prix  qui  Sera  fixe  par  La  Cour  Et  qu'en  outre  il  Sera  Loisible 
aux  habitans  de  Ce  village  de  venir  ches  Luy  quand  il  y  aura 
Des  Sauvages,  faire  La  traitte  pour  des  denres  Et  quil  ne  Leurs 
Soit  point  permis  dy  traitter  de  L'eau  de  vie,  il  Represente  en 
outre  quil  ne  versera  point  d'eau  de  vie  dans  ce  village  a  aucun 
sauvages. 

a  La  demende  du  Sieur  Jn  B*®  Lacroix  La  Cour  Luy  a  accord^ 
La  permission  de  La  traitte  avec  Les  Sauvages  moyenant  quil 
ne  donnera  point  a  Boire  au  Sauvages  dans  le  village  Et  quil 
vendra  aux  habitans  de  ce  village  par  privillege  apres  Sa  pro- 
vision faitte,  Savoir. 

Lhuille  a  trois  Livres  dix  Sols. 

Le  Suif  a  une  livre  dix  Sols. 

Les  plats  Cotes  a  Sept  Livres  dix  Sols.  \    ] 

Le  chevreuil  En  viandes  Dix  livres. 

Les  paux  Boucannee  Cinq  Livres. 

Et  Les  habitants  auront  vingt  quatre  heure  apres  Le  depart 
des  Sauvages  pour  venir  acheter  Leurs  Besoin  ches  Mond*  Sieur 
Lacroix,  Et  quapres  Ce  terns  il  Sera  maitre  de  le  vendre  a  tout 
autre  Ce  a  quoy  il  Est  convenu. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  4  D'avril. 

fr  saucier.  G  Blin 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  au  11  avril.  Extraordinaire. 
President  Jen.  B^^  Lacroix        B*^  Saucier 
raph^^  Gagne  B*^  Dubuque 

Present 
ANT.  ARMANT  Demeudcur  Josp^  Butau  Defendeur 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  defendeur  Disant  quil  Luy  auroit 
Donne  une  paire  de  Jeune  Boeuf  a  dompter  moyenant  quil  feroit 
Ses  Semences  avec.  mais  Le  Demendeur  dit  ne  sen  Etre  servis 
que  quatre  Jour  Et  a  nouri  Les  Dits  Boeuf  trois  semaine  au  foin 
Et  maiy  [sic]  Et  que  Comme  Le  defendeur  aujourdhuy  Luy 
reprend  Ses  Boeuf  avant  Ses  Semences  faitte  il  demende  que  led* 
Deffendeur  soit  Condanner  a  luy  payer  Le  tems  quil  a  noury  Ses 
Boeuf  Et  La  peine  de  les  avoir  fait  Dompter. 

For  further  particulars  about  this  license  to  trade  see  pp.  575,  213,  215,  607. 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1782  127 

price  which  shall  be  fixed  by  the  Court;  and  furthermore  that 
it  shall  be  lawful  for  the  inhabitants  of  this  village  to  come  to 
his  house,  when  savages  are  there,  to  trade  for  provisions;  and 
that  it  shall  not  be  permitted  them  to  trade  there  for  liquor. 
He  shows,  furthermore,  that  he  will  not  serve  liquor  in  this 
village  to  savages. 

At  the  prayer  of  M.  Jean  Bte.  Lacroix,  the  Court  granted 
him  the  permit  to  trade  with  the  savages,  on  condition  that 
he  will  not  give  them  drink  in  this  village,  and  that  he  will  give 
the  preference  to  the  inhabitants  of  this  village  in  selling,  after 
provision  is  made  for  himself,  at  the  following  prices,  to  wit: 

Oil  at  three  livres  ten  sols. 

Tallow  at  one  livre  ten  sols. 

Spare  ribs  at  seven  livres  ten  sols. 

The  meat  of  deer  at  ten  livres. 

Smoked  hides  at  five  livres. 

And  the  inhabitant  shall  have  twenty-four  hours  after  the 
departure  of  the  savages  in  which  to  buy  what  they  need  at  M. 
Lacroix' s;  and  after  that  time  he  shall  be  permitted  to  sell  to 
all  others.     To  this  he  has  agreed.^ 

The  Court  adjourned  to  April  4. 
Fr.  Saucier.  G.  Blin. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  April  11,  for  special  session. 
President,  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.     Bte.  Saucier. 
Raph.  Gagn^.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Present. 
Ant.  Harmand,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jos.  Buteau,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant,  saying  that  the  latter  had 
lent  him  a  pair  of  young  oxen  to  break  in  return  for  the  use  of 
them  during  his  sowing;  but  the  plaintff  says  that  he  had  used 
them  only  four  days,  after  he  had  fed  the  said  oxen  three  weeks 
on  hay  and  corn,  and  that,  since  the  defendant  took  his  oxen 
back  to-day  before  he  had  finished  his  sowing,  he  therefore  prays 
that  the  said  defendant  be  condemned  to  pay  him  for  the  time 
that  he  fed  his  oxen  and  for  the  trouble  he  had  in  breaking 
them. 


128  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Le  deffendeur  repond  quil  a  pris  Ses  Boeuf  parceque  il  Setoit 
aperfu  que  L'on  menoit  mal  Ses  Boeuf. 

Le  demendeur  produit  un  tdmoin  qui  dit  que  le  deffendeur  avoit 
Donn^  Ses  Boeuf  au  demendeur  pour  tous  le  terns  de  Ses  semences. 
LaCouraCondanner  Le  deffendeur  a  payer  au  demendeur  Vingt 
franc  pour  Le  tems  quil  a  nouri  Ses  Boeuf  Et  a  payer  Les  fraix. 

a  une  meme  Cour  Clement  alary  demende  quil  soit  hautorize 
de  faire  rendre  Compte  a  piere  Chauvin  du  Bien  que  pent  revenir 
au  mineurs  Buat  Labecace  du  Cotte  de  leur  mere. 

La  Cour  a  accorde  a  La  demende  de  Clement  alary  pourvu 
que  Les  tuteur  des  dits  mineurs  y  Soyent  present. 
La  Court  Est  ajournd  au  2^«  may. 
fr  saucier,  dark.  J  B  H  LaCroix 

a  une  Court  du  i8  avril  1782  par  extraordinaire. 
President  George  Blin  B*^  Saucier 

raphael  Gagne  Piere  Granmon 

J"  B*^  Lacroix  B*«  Dubuque 

Jos^  Cecire  Present 

La  Court  Etant  assemble  au  nom  des  habitants  pour  repondre 
a  la  requette  a  Eux  presente  par  antoine  Girardin  Sur  La  pro- 
position quil  Leur  fait  pour  L'abandon  de  Son  moulin  Et  aussi 
pour  donner  toutte  Les  Connoissances  a  M^  Richard  Winston 
Lieutenant  Gouverneur  Civile  pour  la  Contd  Des  Illinois,  de 
toutte  Les  affaires  qui  Ce  Sont  passe  avec  led*  Girardin  Et  Les 
habitants  afl&n  den  venir  a  une  Conclusion. 

Veu  que  La  requette  prdsente  aud*  habitant  En  General  La 
Cour  a  renvoye  aux  habitant  a  En  faire  reponse. 

fr  saucier.  G  Blin 

a  une  Cour  du  9  may  1782  Extraordinaire. 
President  G  Blin  Jos^  Cecire 

pierre  Granmon  B*®  Saucier 

raphael  Gagn^  J"  B*^  Dubuque 

jn  ;gte  Lacroix  present 

monsieur  fr  trottier  ayant  fait  assemble  La  Cour,  au  nom  du 
public  pour  Demender  a  m^  T  Brady  Les  pouvoir  quil  a  de  faire 
Des  Deffences  au  public. 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1782  129 

The  defendant  answers  that  he  took  the  oxen  away  because 
he  noticed  that  they  were  treated  badly. 

The  plaintiff  produces  a  witness,  who  says  that  the  plaintiff 
had  given  the  oxen  to  the  defendant  for  all  the  time  of  sowing. 

The  Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay  the  plaintiff 
twenty  francs  for  the  time  he  fed  his  oxen  and  to  pay  the  cost. 

At  the  same  Court  Clement  Alarie  prays  that  he  be  author- 
ized to  make  Pierre  Chauvin  render  account  of  the  goods,  which 
may  accrue  to  the  minors  Buyat  Labecasse  from  their  mother. 

The  Court  granted  the  prayer  of  Clement  Alarie,  provided 
the  guardians  of  the  said  minors  are  there  present. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  May  2. 
Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  Lacroix. 

At  a  special  session  of  the  Court,  April  18,  1782. 
President,  George  Blin.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Raphael  Gagn^  Pierre  Grandmont. 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Jos.  Cesirre.  Present. 

The  Court  assembled  in  the  name  of  the  inhabitants  to  make 
response  to  the  petition  presented  to  them  by  Antoine  Girardin, 
in  which  he  proposes  to  them  to  abandon  his  mill  and  to  give  full 
cognizance  of  all  the  causes  between  himself  and  the  inhabitants 
to  Mr.  Richard  Winston,  lieutenant  civil  governor  of  the  county 
of  Illinois,  that  a  conclusion  may  be  reached  concerning  them. 

Considering  that  the  petition  is  presented  to  the  inhabitants 
in  general,  the  Court  referred  it  to  the  inhabitants  to  make 
response  thereto. 

Fr.  Saucier.  G.  Blin. 

At  a  special  session  of  the  Court,  May  9,  1782. 
President  G.  Blin.  Jos.  Cesirre. 

Pierre  Grandmont.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Raphael  Gagne.         •  Jean  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.  Present. 

M.  Fr.  Trottier  assembled  the  Court  in  the  name  of  the  public 
to  demand  of  M.  Brady  what  power  he  had  to  publish  prohibi- 
tions to  the  public. 


I30  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Thomas  Brady  ayant  paru  a  dit  qu'en  Sa  quality  de  depute 
pour  les  Sauvages  quil  fesoit  Deffence  de  la  trette  de  taffia  avec 
Eux. 

La  Cour  Luy  a  represente  quelle  fesoit  Elle  meme  Ses  deffences, 
Et  que  Si  il  a  quelque  plainte  a  faire  Contre  quelqu'un  de  Ce 
village  au  Sujet  des  Sauvages  de  le  faire  Et  non  pas  de  faire 
aucune  deffence  a  Ce  Sujet  sans  que  la  Cour  en  Soit  instruit. 
f  saucier  Clark.  G.  Blin 

a  une  Cour  20  Juin  1782. 
President  Geo.  Blin  Jos^   Cecire 

piere  Granmon  B*®  Saucier 

raph^®  Gagne  B*^  Dubuque 

jn  gte  Lacroix  Present 

La  Cour  Etant  assemble  pour  prendre  Le  Serment  des  Juges 
nome  par  La  novelle  Ellection  faitte  Le  16  du  Court  par  une  assem- 
ble En  la  maison  de  m^  trottier  Savoir  Les  Sieurs  Geo.  Blin  pierre 
Granmon  B*®  Dubuque,  B^®  alary,  B*^  Baron,  Gabriel  Baron  Et 
Louis  Lebrun. 

Les  Suivant  Juges  Savoir  George  Blin  &c,  Les  dits  Juges  cy 
dessus  mentionn^  ont  pris  Le  Serment  de  fidelity  aux  Etats  ainsi 
que  celuy  de  Juge  de  Paix  &c  selon  Leurs  List. 

a  une  Cour  tenue  pour  le  district  des  [sic]  du  village  des 
Cahokia  Le  20  Juin  1782. 

a  ordonne  que  fr  Saucier  soit  apointe  dark  de  Cette  Cour. 

fr  Saucier  a  pris  le  Serment  de  fidelity  Et  d'office  Et  a  pris 
Sa  place  En  qualite  de  Clark. 

a  une  meme  Cour  a  Ete  ordonne  que  niColas  Chabot  Continu- 
roit  Sa  charge  de  Cherif  de  la  Cour. 

nicolas  Chabot  a  pris  le  Serment  de  fidelite  Et  doffice. 
Louis  pillet  Demendeur  Jos.  asselin  Deffendeur 

Louis  pillet  presente  un  marche  passe  Entre  Luy  Et  Le  def- 
fendeur pour  ouvrage  que  le  deffendeur  devoit  faire  a  Sa  maison 
parceque  le  deffendeur  refuse  [?]  de  le  Suivre. 

Le  deffendeur  Expose  que  nayant  pas  fait  L'ouvrage  autant  dit 
non  pas  par  sa  fautte  puisquil  na  Jamais  ete  force  par  le  demend- 

1  Brady  was  Indian  commissioner  for  the  state  of  Virginia. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1782  131 

Thomas  Brady  appeared  and  said  that  in  his  office  of  deputy 
for  the  savages  he  prohibited  trade  in  tafia  with  them.^ 

The  Court  shows  that  it  published  itself  such  a  prohibi- 
tion; and  demands  that,  if  there  is  any  complaint  to  make  against 
any  one  of  this  village  on  the  subject  of  the  savages,  he  is  to  make 
it,  and  not  to  publish  prohibitions  on  the  subject  without  inform- 
ing the  Court. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 

At  a  Court,  June  20,  1782. 
President,  Geo.  Blin.  Jos.  Cesirre. 

Pierre  Grandmont.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Raph.  Gagne.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.  Present. 

The  Court  assembled  to  receive  the  oath  of  the  judges  elected 
by  the  new  election,  which  was  held  the  i6th  of  the  present 
month  in  the  house  of  M.  Trottier,  namely  MM.  Geo.  Blin, 
Pierre  Grandmont,  Bte.  Dubuque,  Bte.  Alarie,  Bte.  Baron, 
Gabriel  Baron,  and  Louis  Lebrun. 

The  following  judges,  namely  George  Blin,  etc.,  mentioned 
above,  took  the  oath  of  fidelity  to  the  States  and  also  that  of 
justices  of  the  peace,  etc.,  according  to  the  list. 

At  a  Court  held  for  the  district  of  the  village  of  Cahokia,  June 
20,  1782. 

The  Court  ordered  that  Fr.  Saucier  be  appointed  clerk  of  this 
Court. 

Fr.  Saucier  took  the  oath  of  fidelity  and  also  that  of  office, 
and  took  his  place  as  clerk. 

At  the  same  Court  it  was  ordered  that  Nicolas  Chabot  should 
continue  his  commision  of  sheriff  of  the  Court. 

Nicolas  Chabot  took  oath  of  fidelity  and  of  office. 
Louis  Pillet,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jos.  Asselin,  Defendant, 

Louis  Pillet  presents  an  agreement  entered  into  by  himself 
and  the  defendant  for  work,  which  the  latter  was  to  do  on  his 
house,  because  the  defendant  refuses  to  keep  it. 

The  defendant  explains  that  he  has  not  done  the  work  as  said, 
but  not  through  his  fault,  but  because  he  has  never  been  com- 


132  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

eur  de  Le  faire,  Et  que  Comme  il  y  a  Cinq  ans  que  Led*  march^ 
Est  passe  il  trouve  que  le  prix  Est  trop  mediocre  il  demende  aug- 
mentation. 

La  Cour  a  Condanne  Le  demendeur  a  rembours^  a  deffendeurj 
La  Somme  de  Soixante  Et  dix  Livres  pour  n'avoir  pas  oblige  Le 
deffendeur  a  faire  Son  ouvrage  au  terns  Echus  Et  a  payer  Les 
fraix  EntreEux. 

Demendeur  G.  Constant    Deffendeur   at   arment 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  L  deffendeur  disant  que  Sous  Le 
prete::: :  dit  il  que  Son  Enffant  Luy  auroit  manqu^  quil  L'auroit  at- 
taque  En  Luy  disant,  va  mon  fils  dire  a  ton  p^re  quil  a  mang^  Le 
cochon  de  Granmon,  Ce  que  Le  demendeur  demende  quil  Luy 
prouve  par  Sa  partie  adverse  quil  L'en  acquse. 

Le  deffendeur  dit  quil  a  Entendu  dire  a  m^  Granmon  quil 
pensoit  que  le  demendeur  auroit  pu  Le  faire. 

m^.  Granmon  dit  queffectivement  quil  la  pens^  mais  quil  ne 
L'en  accusoit  pas  positivement  n'en  Etant  point  Sure. 

La  Cour  a  renvoye  Le  Demendeur  Et  le  deffendeur  Sans  aucune 
Dessision  puisque  le  demendeur  nest  pas  Juste  dans  ces  demendes 
Et  pour  Les  Sotises  quils  ce  Sont  Dit  Sont  Condann^  a  payer 
tous  Les  deux  Les  fraix. 

Lemc  Demendeur  Jo  Cecire  Deffendeur 

a  une  meme  Cour  une  requette  prdsente  par  Louis  Leme 
habitant  de  S*  philipe  pour  un  soque  quil  luy  a  Et6  ote  de  Sa 
charu  par  m^  Cecire  Sous  le  pretex  dit  il  que  ledit  leme  Luy  devoit 
quinze  franc.  Ce  qui  La  mis  hor  detat  de  faire  Ses  Semence  Et 
de  les  faire  faire  Dont  il  Luy  En  a  Coute  Suivant  Le  Sertificat 
de  m^  Ch.  Cadron  Cent  franc  pour  faire  Sa  Semence. 

Joseph  Cecire  dit  quil  Est  vray  quil  a  pris  Le  Soque  mais  que 
ce  n'est  que  par  ce  que  led^  Lemd  Luy  devoit  quinze  franc  pour 
avoir  Ete  Emprisonnd  ches  Luy  Et  que  Si  il  Lut  paye  il  ne  L'au- 
roit pas  fait. 

La  Cour  a  Condanner  Le  Sieur  Secire  a  rembourser  au  de- 
mendeur Ce  qui  Luy  en  a  Cout^  pour  faire  faire  Ses  Semences  Et  a 

1  There  was  no  prison  in  Cahokia,  and  the  fort  was  sometimes  used  for  that  purpose, 
but  not  always.  A  prisoner  was  more  often  placed  in  the  custody  of  an  officer.  Since  no 
case  in  which  Lemay  was  sentenced  to  imprisonment  occurs  in  the  Record,  the  imprisonment 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1782  133 

pelled  to  do  it  by  the  plaintiff;  and^that,  as  it  was  five  years 
ago  that  the  bargain  was  made,  he  finds  that  the  price  is  too 
low  and  demands  an  increase. 

The  Court  condemned  the  plaintiff  to  reimburse  the  defend- 
ant the  sum  of  seventy  livres  for  not  having  compelled  the  defend- 
ant to  do  his  work  in  the  expired  time  and  both  to  pay  the  costs. 
G.  Constant,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Ant.  Harmand,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant,  saying  that  under  the  alleged 
pretext  that  his  child  had  put  a  slight  upon  the  defendant,  the 
latter  had  assaulted  him  and  said:  "Go,  my  son,  and  tell  your 
father  that  he  ate  Grandmont's  pig";  and  the  plaintiff  prays 
that  this,  of  which  he  is  accused,  be  proved  by  the  opposing 
party. 

The  defendant  says  that  he  heard  M.  Grandmont  say  that 
he  thought  that  the  plaintiff  might  have  done  it. 

M.  Grandmont  says  that  in  fact  he  thought  it;  but  that  he 
did  not  positively  accuse  him  thereof,  because  he  was  not  sure. 

The  Court  dismissed  the  plaintiff  and  the  defendant  without 
passing  judgment,  since  the  plaintiff  is  not  just  in  his  demands; 
and  for  the  abusive  language  they  have  used,  they  are  both  con- 
demned to  pay  the  costs 

Lemay,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jos.  Cesirre,  defendant. 

At  the  same  Court  a  petition  was  presented  by  Louis  Lemay, 
inhabitant  of  St.  Phillippe,  for  a  plowshare,  which  had  been 
taken  from  his  plough  by  M.  Cesirre  under  the  alleged  pretext 
that  the  said  Lemay  owed  him  fifteen  francs.  This  put  him  out 
of  condition  to  do  his  sowing,  and  the  cost  of  having  it  done,  ac- 
cording to  the  certificate  of  M.  Ch.  Cadron,  was  one  hundred 
francs. 

Joseph  Cesirre  says  that  it  is  true  that  he  took  the  plowshare, 
but  only  because  the  said  Lemay  owed  him  fifteen  francs  for 
his  imprisonment  at  his  house  and  that,  if  he  had  paid  him,  he 
would  not  have  done  it.^ 

The  Court  condemned  M.  Cesirre  to  repay  to  the  plaintiff  what 
it  had  cost  him  to  have  his  sowing  done,  after  retaining  the  fifteen 

may  date  back  to  the  British  period,  when  Cesirre's  father  was  judge  and  commandant  at 
Cahokia. 


134  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

rendre  au  demendeur  Sa  charue  garni  tel  quel  Etoit  Lorsquil  y  a 
touche.  Et  ce  ches  Luy  a  S*  philipe.  Et  Le  deffendeur  a  payer 
Les  fraix.  apres  avoir  retenu  quinze  Livre  que  le  Demendeur 
Luy  Doit  pour  L'emprissonnement  ches  luy. 

f.  saucier   Clark  G.    Blin 

a  une  Cour  tenu  Le  8  aoust  1782. 
president  G.  Blin  Louis  Lebrun 

piere  Granmon  Gabriel  Baron 

B^«  Baron  B^^  Dubuque 

B*^   Alary  Present 

Demendeur  Gabriel  Cerre  Deffendeur  ant  armant 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  le  deffendeur  pour  une  Somme  de 
mil  Six  Cent  quarante  Six  livres  tant  pour  un  negre  que  pour  une 
terre  quil  Luy  a  ete  adjuge  a  L'ancan  de  feu  Sieur  nicol  Suivant 
Son  obligation,  Et  Expose  en  outre  Led*  sieur  demendeur  quil 
auroit  deja  fait  Sinifie  audit  Deffendeur  de  payer  Son  obligation 
Et  L'ayant  refuse  de  faire,  il  demende  L' interest  depuis  deux 
ans  que  La  Demende  En  a  Ete  faitte. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  par  Sa  requette  que  Ladite  [sic]  Negre 
ayant  Ete  apres  trois  mois  dachap  attin  [sic]  Et  Convincu  d'avoir 
Empoisonne  son  maitre  Et  Sa  maitresse  quil  a  Ete  Contrain 
par  ordre  de  Livrer  Led*  negre  a  la  Justice  Et  quil  ne  Devoit 
pas  Le  payer. 

Le  demendeur  repond  Encore  que  Lorsque  Le  negre  a  Ete 
vendu  quil  avoit  ete  Jusquil  a  Connu  pour  un  Bon  Sujet,  et  que 
Si  le  Deffendeur  ne  lut  point  achete  un  autre  L'auroit  fait. 

La  Cour  ayant  examine  Les  demendes  Et  Deffence  L'obli- 
gation  du  Sieur  ant  armant  EUe  L'a  Condanner  a  payer  au  de- 
mendeur Son  obligation  ainsi  que  L'interest  dud*  obligation 
depuis  Son  Echeance  et  les  fraix. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  au  Jeudy  5  ybre. 
fr  saucier  Clark  G  Blin 

1  The  name  of  the  negro  was  Pompee,  and  he  was  under  arrest  at  the  time  Manuel 
and  Moreau  were  convicted  for  poisoning  the  Nicolles.  See  supra,  p.  13  et  seq.  This  case 
occupies  the  attention  of  several  sessions.     See  pp.  137,  1Q3,  196,  n.  i. 


COURT  RECORD,  AUGUST,  1782        135 

livres  which  was  owed  him  for  imprisonment  at  his  house,  and 
to  return  to  the  plaintiff  the  plow  in  the  same  condition  it  was 
in  when  he  meddled  with  it,  and  this  at  his  house  in  St.  Philippe; 
and  the  defendant  is  to  pay  the  costs. 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 

At  a  Court  held  August  8,  1782. 
President,  G.  Blin.  Louis  Lebrun. 

Pierre  Grandmont.  Gabriel  Baron. 

Bte.  Baron.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Bte.  Alarie.  Present. 

Gabriel  Cerre,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Ant.  Harmand,  Defendant 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  a  sum  of  one  thousand 
and  forty-six  livres,  according  to  his  obligation  given  for  a  negro 
and  a  plantation  which  were  adjudged  him  at  the  auction  of  the 
late  M.  NicoUe's  property;  and  the  plaintiff  further  shows  that 
he  has  already  notified  the  defendant  to  pay  his  obligation  and, 
since  he  has  refused  to  pay,  he  demands  interest  for  the  two  years 
since  the  demand  was  made. 

The  defendant  answers  by  a  petition  in  which  he  affirms  that 
the  said  negro,  three  months  after  purchase,  was  arrested  and 
convicted  of  having  poisoned  his  master  and  mistress ;  and  that 
he  had  been  compelled  by  order  to  deliver  the  said  negro  to 
justice,  and  therefore  he  ought  not  to  pay  for  him.^ 

The  plaintiff  answers  that  when  the  negro  was  sold,  he  had  been 
known  for  a  person  of  good  character;  and  that,  if  the  defendant 
had  not  bought  him,  some  one  else  would  have  done  so. 

The  Court,  after  examining  the  prayers,  the  defence  and  the 
obligation  of  M.  Ant.  Harmand,  condemned  him  to  pay  to  the 
plaintiff  his  obligation  and  the  interest,  since  its  maturity,  and 
the  costs. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  September  5. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 


136  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  9  7bre  1782. 
President  Geo.  Blin  Louis  Lebrun 

Pierre  Granmon  Gabriel  Baron 

B^®  Baron  Jean  B*^  Dubuque 

B*®  alary  Present 

Demendeur  Gabriel  Cerre  Deffendeur  ant  armant 
Le  demendeur  represente  a  la  Cour  qu'en  vertu  de  La  San- 
tance  qui  a  Ete  rendu  Contre  Le  Deffendeur  La  Cour  derniere, 
il  auroit  fait  Sinifier  La  ditte  Sentance  aud*  Deffendeur  mais 
quayant  reffuse  de  payer  Son  obligation,  il  demende  une 
Saisi  Sur  tout  Les  biens  du  deffendeur  Et  une  Execution  pour 
parvenir  au  parfait  payement. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  tant  qu'a  L'article  dune  terre  qui 
Luy  a  Et^  adjug^  quil  Est  prest  a  La  payer,  mais  que  pour  le 
negre  il  en  veut  rapeller  a  La  virginie  et  demende  quil  Luy  Soit 
permis  de  la  faire. 

Le  deffendeur  ayant  Ete  Condann^  a  la  cour  derniere  de  payer 
Son  obligation  ainsi  quil  Est  Explique  dans  La  Santance.  Et 
ne  L'ayant  pas  fait  La  Cour  a  accorde  au  demendeur  une  Exe- 
cution Sur  Les  Biens  du  deffendeur  pour  Etre  vendu  Jusqu'a 
La  Somme  de  son  obligation  ainsi  que  Linterest  Et  Les  fraix. 
Sauf  au  deffendeur  apres  a  en  rapeller  ou  Bon  Luy  Semblera. 
La  Cour  Est  ajourn^  a  Jeudy  3^.  8bre. 
f.  saucier  Clark  G  Blin 

President  G.  Blin  Louis  lebrun 

pierre  Granmon  Gabriel  Baron 

B*«  Baron  B^^  Dubuque 

B*®  alary  Present 

Joseph  travercy  ayant  paru  a  pris  Le  Serment  de  fidelity 
ainsi  que  celuy  de  cherif  de  la  cour. 

Joseph  Lepage  prdsente  une  requette  par  laquelle  il  demende 
une  assemble  de  parens  et  damy  pour  La  nomination  d'un  tu- 
teur  a  Leon  Lepage. 

La  Cour  a  accord^  au  Sieur  Lepage  Suivant  Sa  demende. 
fr.  saucier  G.  Blin 

^  No  date  given. 


COURT  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1782  137 

'• 
At  a  Court,  September  9,  1782. 

President  Geo.  Blin.  Louis  Lebrun. 

Pierre  Grandmont.  Gabriel  Baron. 

Bte.  Baron.  Jean  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Bte.  Alarie.  Present. 

Gabriel  Cerre,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Ant.  Harmand,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  shows  the  Court  that  in  virtue    of   the    decree 

which  was  rendered  against  the  defendant  at  the  last  Court,  he 

had  served  notice  of  the  said  decree  on  the  said  defendant;  but 

since  he  refused  to  pay  his  obligation,  he  prays  for  a  writ  of 

seizure  on   all   the  goods  of  the  defendant  and  an  execution  in 

order  to  obtain  full  payment. 

The  defendant  answers  that  as  to  the  item  of  a  plantation 

which  was  adjudged  him,  he  was  ready  to  pay  for  that;  but  that  he 

wishes  to  appeal  to  Virginia  in  regard  to  the  negro,  and  prays 

that' he  be  permitted  to  do  so. 

Since  the  defendant  was  condemned  at  the  last  Court  to  pay  his 

obligation,  as  was  explained  in  the  decree;  and  since  he  has  not 

done  so,  the  Court  granted  the  plaintiff  a  writ  of  execution  on  the 

goods  of  the  defendant  in  order  that  they  be  sold  up  to  the  sum 

of  the  obligation,  interest  and  costs,  saving  to  the  defendant  the 

right  to  appeal  wherever  it  shall  seem  best  to  him. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  October  8. 

F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 

President  G.  Blin.  Louis  Lebrun. 

Pierre  Grandmont.  Gabriel  Baron. 

Bte.  Baron.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Bte.  Alarie.  Present.^ 

Joseph  Travercy  appeared  and  took  oath  of  fidelity  and  also 

that  of  sheriff  of  the  Court. 

Joseph  Lepage  presents  a  petition,  in  which  he  prays  for  an 

assembly  of  relatives  and  friends  to  name  a  guardian  for  Leon 

Lepage. 

The   Court  granted   this   to   M.   Lepage    according   to  his 

prayer. 

Fr.  Saucier.  G.  Blin. 


138  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  7^^  gbre  1782. 
President  G.  Blin  B*^  Dubuque 

P.  Granmon  Gabriel  baron 

L  lebrun  Present 

une  requette  presente  par  M^  fr.  trottier  qui  demende  La  vente  de 
la  maison  de  veuve  lapierre,  Suivant  L'opignon  des  parrens  et  amy. 

La  Cour  a  accord^  aud*  Sieur  trottier  Suivant  Sa  demende. 

a  une  meme  Cour  une  Comission  de  procureur  des  Etat  presente 
par  M^  Labuxierre  demendant  Lenregistrement  de  la  ditte  Comis- 
sion dans  Les  registre  de  ce  Siege,  Et  a  prete  Serment  de  Son  office. 

La  Cour  a  accorde  aud*  Sieur  Labuxiere  Suivant  Sa  demende. 

a  une  meme  Cour  Joseph  Belcour  Demende  par  une  requette 
Son  Ementipation  dage  pour  Jouir  de  Ses  Biens  Et  Se  faire  rendre 
Compte. 

La  Cour  a  accorde  aud*  Belcour  suivant  Sa  demende. 
Demendeur  Louis  trottier         Deffendeur  J.  B*®  Lacroix 

le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  un  Cochon  quil 
Luy  a  Ete  tue  dans  Prairie  comme  ayant  Passe  par  sa  Cloture. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  le  meme  Jour  que  les  Cochon  ont 
passe  par  les  Cloture  quil  y  avoir  deux  autre  Breche  aux  autre 
autre  [sic]  cloture  une  a  celle  de  L.  trottier  Et  a  celle  de 
cadien  une  autre  Et  quil  pouroit  Ce  faire  que  Les  Cochons 
auroit  par  d'autre  Breche  que  par  celle  de  sa  Cloture,  Le 
demendeur  fait  Serment  quil  na  rien  passe  par  La  Breche  de 
Sa  Cloture  m^  Gagne  fesant  La  visite  Ce  Jour  La  ayant  paru 
a  fait  Serment  quil  ne  Se  point  apergu  quil  auroit  passe  de 
Cochon  par  dautre  Cloture  que  Celle  de  J"  B*^  Lacroix. 

Vue  Des  demendes  et  deffance  le  Sertificat  de  louis  trottier  La 
declaration  de  raphael  Gage  Son  Serment  La  Cour  a  Condanne  Le 
deffendeur  a  rendre  un  Cochon  pareil  au  deffendeur  ou  a  luy  payer, 
demendeur   l.  trottier        Deffendeur  B*^  Saucier 

a  une  meme  Cour  le  demendeur  poursuit  le  deffendeur  pour 
un  Cochon  qui  a  passe  par  la  Bariere  Comme  Son  negre  en  est 
le  gardien. 

1  The  commission  is  printed  on  p.  487. 

2  The  gate  was  situated  near  the  village  close  to  the  Jarrot  house,  which  at  the  present 
time  is  used  as  a  convent  school,  and  gave  entrance  to  the  common  field . 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1782  139 

At  a  Court,  November  7,  1782. 
President  G.  Blin.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

P.  Grandmont.  Gabriel  Baron. 

L.  Lebrun.  Present. 

A  petition  presented  by  M.  Fr.  Trottier,  in  which  he  prays  for 
the  sale  of  the  house  of  Madame  Lapierre,  widow,  in  accordance 
with  the  vote  of  relatives  and  friends. 

The  Court  granted  this  to  M.  Trottier  according  to  his  prayer. 

At  the  same  Court  a  commission  of  state's  attorney  was  pre- 
sented by  M.  Labuxiere,  who  prays  for  the  registry  of  the  said  com- 
mission in  the  records  of  this  Court;  and  he  took  oath  of  office.^ 

The  Court  granted  this  to  M.  Labuxiere  according  to  his  prayer. 

At  the  same  Court  Joseph  Belcour  prays  by  petition  for  his 
writ  of  livery  to  enjoy  his  property  and  to  have  account  rendered. 

The  Court  granted  this  to  the  said  Belcour  according  to  his 
prayer. 
Louis  Trottier,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  a  pig  of  his,  which  was 
killed  in  the  prairie,  and  declares  that  it  passed  through  the  de- 
fendant's fence. 

The  defendant  answers  that  on  the  same  day  that  the  pigs 
passed  through  the  fence  there  were  two  other  breaks  in  other 
fences,  one  in  L.  Trottier's  and  another  in  Cadien's  and  points 
out  that  it  might  have  happened  that  the  pigs  passed  through 
another  gap  than  through  that  in  his  fence.  The  plaintiff  made 
oath  that  nothing  passed  through  the  gap  in  his  fence.  M. 
Gagne,  who  made  the  inspection  that  day,  appeared  and  made 
oath  that  he  had  not  seen  the  pigs  pass  through  other  fences  than 
that  of  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix. 

In  view  of  the  prayers,  the  defence,  the  certificate  of  Louis 
Trottier  and  the  declaration  under  oath  of  Raphael  Gagne,  the 
Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  deliver  a  similar  pig  to  the 
plaintiff  or  to  pay  him 

L.  Trottier,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Bte.  Saucier,  Defendant. 

At  the  same  Court  the  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  a  pig,  which 
passed  the  gate,^  of  which  the  defendant's  negro  is  the  guardian. 


I40  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  led*  Cochon  a  profits  du  moment 
que  legre  [sic]  ouvroit  la  Bariere  au  charette  qui  vont  Et  viene 
Et  neanmoins  il  auroit  fait  Son  possible  ainsi  que  le  fis  de  Jo^ 
mesohville  a  empecher  de  passer  led*  Cochon  a  quoy  il  n'ont 
pas  reussir. 

Le  deffendeur  produit  un  Sertificat  de  m^^  laflame  qui  declare 
que  le  negre  a  fait  tout  Son  possible  pour  ramener  Led*  Cochon 
ainsi  que  les  Enfans  dud*  demendeur  Et  quelle  auroit  entendu 
dire  par  M<^®  trottier  revene  La  truye  reviendra  Sessoir. 

Veu  Les  demendes  Et  deffence  Le  Sertificat  La  Cour  a  Con- 
dann^  le  demendeur  a  perdre  Son  Cochon  vue  que  Cest  une 
chose  que  I'on  a  pas  pu  prevoir  Et  en  outre  que  Sa  femme  ne 
devoit  pas  les  rapeller,  Et  faire  que  peut  Etre  il  auroit  ramener 
Led*  Cochon. 

La  Cour  Est  ajournd  a  jeudy  7,  Dexenber  1782. 

fr.  saucier  dark.  G  Blin 

a  une  Cour  du  27  Qbre  Extraordinaire. 
President  Geo.  Blin  Louis  lebrun 

pierre  Granmon  Gabriel  Baron 

B*e  Baron  B*«  Dubuque 

Present 
Demendeur  M^®  Beaullieu      Deffendeur  ant  armant 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  le  deffendeur  pour  une  somme  de 
quartorze  cent  livres  En  pelleterie  qui  luy  Sont  due,  Et  Echu  de- 
puis  quelque  tems. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  qui  ne  luy  Est  pas  possible  de  faire  cette 
Somme  vue  L' impossibility  de  trouver  de  la  pelleterie  Et  que 
qu'une  meme  Sil  venderais  tous  Ses  Biens  il  ne  Suffiroit  pas  pour 
faire  Laditte  Somme. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  au  Deffendeur  de  prendre  des  arenge- 
ment  avec  le  demendeur. 

Le  deffendeur  a  prix  des  arrengement  avec  m^  trottier  a  qui 
qui  Le  demendeur  Doit  pour  La  ditte  Somme  et  est  par  ce  moyen 
liquider  avec  le  demendeur. 

f.>  saucier,  dark  Gi,Blin 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1782  141 

The  defendant  answers  that  the  said  pig  profited  by  the  mo- 
ment that  the  negro  opened  the  gate  for  a  cart  which  goes  and 
comes,  and  yet  the  negro  had  done  his  best,  as  had  also  the  son  of 
Jos.  Maisonville,  to  hinder  the  said  pig  from  passing,  in  which 
they  had  not  succeeded. 

The  defendant  produces  a  certificate  by  Madame  Laflamme,  in 
which  she  declares  that  the  negro  and  also  the  children  of  the  said 
plaintiff  did  their  very  best  to  drive  the  pig  back;  and  that  she  had 
heard  Madame  Trottier  say:  "Come  back,  the  sow  will  return 
this  evening". 

Considering  the  demands,  the  defence  and  the  certificate,  the 
Court  condemned  the  plaintiff  to  lose  his  pig,  seeing  that  what  had 
happened  could  not  be  foreseen,  and  furthermore  that  his  wife 
ought  not  to  have  recalled  the  children,  and  ought  to  have  acted 
so  that  they  might,  perhaps,  have  brought  the  said  pig  back. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  December  7,  1782. 
Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 

At  a  special  session  of  the  Court,  November  27. 
President  Geo.  Blin.  Louis  Lebrun. 

Pierre  Grandmont.  Gabriel  Baron. 

Bte.  Baron.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Present. 
Madame  Beaulieu,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Ant.  Harmand,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  the  sum  of  fourteen  hun- 
dred livres  in  peltries,  which  are  due  her  and  since  some  time  fallen 
due. 

The  defendant  answers  that  it  is  impossible  to  make  up  this 
sum  because  of  the  impossibility  of  finding  peltries  and  that  even 
if  he  sold  all  his  property,  it  would  not  be  sufficient  to  make  up  the 
said  sum. 

The  Court  ordered  the  defendant  to  make  some  arrangement 
with  the  plaintiff. 

The  defendant  made  arrangements  with  M.  Trottier,  to 
whom  the  plaintiff  is  indebted  for  this  sum,  and  who  will  settle 
with  the  plaintiff  by  this  means. 

F.^  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 


142  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

a  une  Cour  14  xbre  par  extraordinaire. 
President  George  Blin  Louis  Lebrun 

pierre  Granmon  J"  B*^  Dubuque 

Present 
Demendeur    ren6  Bouvet    DefTendeur  Louigau 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  avoir  Sans  Luy 
avoir  porte  aucune  plainte  contre  Son  negre  Et  Luy  avoir  donne 
un  Si  mauvais  Coup  a  la  tete  D'un  Coup  de  Baton  qui  le 
m'est  or  detat  de  travaille,  Et  demende  quil  soit  trete  au  depend 
du  deffendeur,  Et  le  tor  que  sela  luy  fait  etant  dans  Des 
travaux. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  quil  auroit  frape  le  negre  apres  luy  avoir 
dit  par  differentes  fois  de  sortir  de  ches  Luy  Comme  il  alloit  de- 
mende a  Son  frere  ce  quil  luy  devoit  Et  que  n  'ayant  pas  voulu  Le 
faire  il  L  'auroit  frape. 

Le  demendeur  represente  que  le  Deffendeur  n  'auroit  pas 
due  frape  Son  negre  d  'un  Coup  Si  dangereux,  Et  que  Si  il 
luy  etoit  venue  porte  Ses  plainte  quil  luy  auroit  donne  toutte 
satisfaction. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  Si  le  negre  nut  pas  En  Son  absance 
pri  deux  rat  de  Bois  malgre  sa  femme  Sous  Le  pretexte  que 
Cetoit  son  frere  qui  les  avoit  atrape  Et  qui  devoit  au  negre  du 
demendeur. 

Le  negre  ayant  paru  a  dit  que  M^^  Louigau  Luy  avoit  dit  de 
Les  prendre  et  quil  ne  les  auroit  pas  pris  Sans  Cela. 

Madame  Louigau  ayant  paru  a  prete  Serment  de  dire  La  Verite, 
Et  a  dit  que  le  negre  est  venu  ches  elle  luy  demende  ou  etoit  Son 
Beau  frere,  a  qui  il  avoit  Loue  Son  cheval  pour  de  La  viande  Et 
que  n  'ayant  trouve  que  deux  rat  de  Bois  Sur  Sa  table  que  Son 
Beau  frere  Luy  avoit  donne  quil  Les  auroit  pris  malgre  Elle,  et 
Etant  retourne  une  Seconde  fois,  ches  elle  Et  apres  avoir  repete 
a  Son  mari  La  fayon  d  'agir  du  negre  En  Son  absence,  Et  qu'apres 
avoir  dit  au  negre  de  Sortir  de  ches  Luy  plusieur  fois  Et  que 
n  'ayant  pas  voulu  Le  faire  il  L  'auroit  frape  led*  negre. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  que  le  deffendeur  payeroit  au  demendeur 
Cinquante  franc,  pour  avoir  maltrette  Son  negre  de  la  fajon  quil 


COURT  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1782  143 

At  a  special  session  of  the  Court,  December  14. 
President,  George  Blin.  Louis  Lebrun. 

Pierre  Grandmont.  Jean  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Present. 
Rene  Bouvet,  Plaintiff,  i;5.Louis  Gaud,  Defendant. 

The  Plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  having  struck  his  negro, 
without  having  made  any  complaint  against  him,  so  seVere  a  stroke 
on  his  head  with  a  club  that  he  could  not  work;  and  he  prays 
that  the  negro  be  cured  at  the  defendant's  expense  and  that  the 
latter  pay  him  for  the  injury  to  his  work,  which  that  loss  of  time 
did  him. 

The  defendant  answers  that  he  had  struck  the  negro  after  having 
told  him  several  times  to  leave  his  house,  when  he  demanded  of 
his  brother  what  the  latter  was  owing  him;  and  that,  when  the 
negro  was  unwilling  to  obey,  he  struck  him. 

The  plaintiff  shows  that  the  defendant  ought  not  to  have 
struck  his  negro  so  dangerous  a  blow,  and  that,  if  he  had  come 
to  make  complaint  to  him,  he  would  have  given  entire  satisfaction. 

The  defendant  answers  that  the  negro  should  not  have  taken 
in  his  absence  two  raccoons  in  spite  of  his  wife,  under  pretext 
that  the  defendant's  brother,  who  was  in  debt  to  the  plaintiff's 
negro,  had  trapped  them. 

The  negro  appeared  and  said  that  Madame  Louis  Gaud  had 
told  him  to  take  them,  and  that  he  would  not  have  taken  them 
otherwise. 

Madame  Louis  Gaud  appeared  and  made  oath  to  tell  the 
truth,  and  said  that  the  negro  came  to  her  house  and  asked 
where  her  brother-in-law  was,  to  whom  he  had  let  his  horse  in 
exchange  for  meat;  and  that  having  found  on  her  table  only 
two  raccoons,  which  her  brother-in-law  had  given  to  her,  he  took 
them  in  spite  of  her;  and  when  he  returned  a  second  time, 
after  she  had  told  her  husband  of  the  action  of  the  negro  in  his 
absence,  her  husband  told  the  negro  several  times  to  leave;  and, 
when  he  wouldn't  do  it,  he  struck  the  said  negro. 

The  Court  decreed  that  the  defendant  should  pay  the  plaintiff 
fifty  francs  for  having  maltreated  his  negro  in  the  way  he  did ; 


144  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

La  fait  Et  Le  demendeur  fera  Donn^  a  Son  negre  vingt  cinq  Coup 
de  f ouet  pour  punir  insolance,  et  payeront  Les  fraix  de  Lextraor- 
dinaire  Entre  eux  deux. 

La  Cour  Est  ajournd  a  Jeudy  2  Janvier. 

GBlin 
a  une  Cour  du  3^®  avril  1783. 
President  G.  Blin  Louis  lebrun 

B*®  Baron  Gabriel  Baron 

B*e  alary  B*®  Dubuque 

Present 

une  requette  pr^sente  par  le  Sieur  fr.  trottier  demendant  a  la 
Cour  quayant  Et6  nome  avec  Les  Sieurs  Cecire  Beaullieu  et  nicol 
pour  lexecution  du  testament  de  feu  portemay,  et  que  par  le  dec^s 
de  Ses  trois  derniere  il  nauroit  pu  rien  faire  a  Ce  Sujet  et  que  Com- 
me  le  feu  Sieur  Beaulieu  En  Etoit  Lexecuteur  testamenter  il  Suplie 
Laditte  Cour  de  vouloir  Bien  En  nomer  d  'autre  affin  de  visiter 
Les  Comptes  dud*  sieur  Beaullieu  a  Ce  Sujet  Et  luy  faire  rendre 
Compte  Suivant  Comme  Le  Cas  L  'exige;  demende  En  outre  led* 
Sieur  trottier  par  Sa  ditte  requette  que  Se  trouvant  oblige  par  Ses 
affaires  de  quitter  Le  village  pour  quelque  terns  il  il  [sic]  prie  tres 
humblement  Laditte  Cour  de  vouloir  Bien  luy  tenir  de  lieu  et  place 
En  Sa  quality  de  Comd*  aud*  lieu,  pour  mintenir  La  Bonne 
intelligence  Et  Lunion  telle  quelle  a  toujour  r^gne. 

La  Cour  a  nome  a  Leffet  de  L  'execution  du  testament  de  feu 
portemay  Les  Sieur  B*®  LaCroix  G.  Blin  Et  B*®  Saucier  Suivant 
La  Demende  du  Sieur  trottier  accorde  ainsi  que  Ses  autres  de- 
mendes. 

a  une  meme  Cour  le  Sieur  pierre  roy,  porte  plainte,  que  plusieurs 
habitant  refuse  de  faire  Cloture  Commune,  Ettant  oblig^  d'en 
faire  Comme  d  'autre,  au  non  et  Comme  Sindic. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  au  Sindic  de  faire  faire  Les  dittes  Clotures  au 
depans  de  ceux  qui  le  refuse,  Lotorizant  par  notre  ordre  de  le  faire. 

La  Cour  Est  ajournd  au  i^®  de  may  Jeudy. 

fr.  saucier  Clark.  G.  Blin 

1  Nicolle  was  poisoned  in  1778.  Michel  Palmier  called  Beaulieu  died  in  1780  and 
Joseph  Cesirre  about  1779- 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1783  145 

and  that  the  plaintiff  have  his  negro  given  twenty-five  strokes 
with  the  whip  to  punish  his  insolence;  and  that  both  shall 
pay  the  costs  of  the  special  session. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  January  2. 

G.  Blin. 

At  a  Court,  April  3,  1783. 
President,  G.  Blin.  Louis  Lebrun. 

Bte.  Baron.  Gabriel  Baron. 

Bte.  Alarie.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Present. 
A  petition  presented  by  M.  Fr.  Trottier,  in  which  he  prays  the 
Court,  since  he  had  been  named  with  MM.  Cesirre,^  Beaulieu 
and  NicoUe  to  execute  the  last  will  and  testament  of  the  late 
Portemay,  and  by  the  decease  of  these  last  three  he  had  been  able 
to  do  nothing  in  the  matter,  and  since  M.  Beaulieu  was  the  testa- 
mentary executor,  that  the  said  Court  be  willing  to  name  another 
to  examine  the  accounts  of  the  said  M.  Beaulieu  in  the  case 
and  to  have  account  rendered  to  him,  as  the  case  requires. 
Furthermore  the  said  M.  Trottier  prays  the  Court  very  humbly 
that,  since  he  is  obliged  by  his  private  affairs  to  leave  the 
village  for  some  time,  the  said  Court  will  take  his  place  as 
commandant  of  the  said  village  in  order  to  maintain  good  har- 
mony and  union,  such  as  has  always  reigned. ^ 

The  Court  named  with  a  view  to  the  execution  of  the  last 
will  and  testament  of  the  late  Portemay  MM.  Bte.  Lacroix,  G. 
Blin,  and  Bte.  Saucier,  in  accordance  with  the  prayer  of  M. 
Trottier,  and  granted  him  also  his  other  prayers. 

At  the  same  Court  Pierre  Roy,  personally  and  in  his  office  as  syn- 
dic, makes  complaint  that  several  inhaitants  refuse  to  build  the  com- 
mon fence,  although  obliged  to  make  part  of  it  as  are  the  others. 

The  Court  ordered  the  syndic  to  have  the  said  fences  made  at  the 
expense  of  those  who  refuse,  authorizing  him  by  our  order  to  do  so. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  May  i. 
Fr,  Saucier,  Clerk.  G.  Blin. 

2  Trottier  was  preparing  to  go  to  Kentucky  to  appear  before  the  Virginia  commissioners 
to  prove  his  and  his  neighbors'  claims  to  payment  for  supplies  furnished  the  Virginia  troops. 
See  Introduction,  pp.  arix.  et  seq. 


146  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  8  may. 
President  B*^  dubuc  B*^  alary 

B^e  Baron  Ga^  Baron 

Present 
un  [sic]  requette  presente  a  la  Cour  par  philipe  Laflame  repr^sen- 
tant  que  Comme  il  ny  a  point  Eu  D'invantaire  de  faitte  des  Biens 
delesse  par  feu  Charle  Laflame  Son  pere  Lorsque  marie  Joseph 
Larche  Ses  [sic]  remarie  En  Seconde  noce  Son  age  ne  luy  per- 
mettent  point  de  prendre  Ses  propre  interest,  il  demante  quil  soit 
Elu  un  Curateur,  Et  que  led*  invantaire  Soit  fait.  Pour  parvenir  a 
partage. 

La  Cour  accorde  a  la  demende  de  philipe  Laflame. 
La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  Jeudy  22  du   Cour*. 
fr.  saucier  Clark  B    Dubuque 

a  une  Cour  du  26  may  1 783 . 
B*^  Dubuque  B*^  alary 

Pierre  Granmon  Louis  lebrun 

B*®  Baron  Gabriel  Baron 

Present 
La  Cour  Etant  assemble  pour  prendre  les  Serment  des  Sieurs 
Jos^  Bellefeuil  Louis  lebrun  fr  Courie  Jen.  B*®  dehay,  ant  La- 
marche,  pierre  Quenel,  et  Jo^  Lapence,  pour  prendre  leur  place  En 
qualite  de  majistrat  ayant  Ete  nome  par  le  Sufrage  des  voix  pour 
remplacer  les  Encien  majistrat.  Les  Susdit  S^  Bellefeuil  lebrun 
Courie  dehay  Lamarche  quenel  Et  Lapance  ayant  paru  ont  pris  le 
Serment  de  fidelite  ainsi  que  Celuy  d  'office  Et  ont  pris  leurs  Place 
En   qualite   de  majistrat. 

a  une  meme  Court  Joseph  traversy  a  prix  le  Serment  de  fidelite 
Et  dofice  de  Bailif  de  la  ditte  Cour. 

fr.  saucier  a  prix  le  Serment  de  fidelite  ainsi  que  celuy  d  'office 
En  qualite  de  Greffier  de  la  ditte  Cour. 

a  une  meme  Cour  une  requette  presente  par  Gabriel  Baron 
tant  en  Son  nom  que  Comme  ayant  Epouse  Marie  Louise  Butau 
demendant  que  le  retrait  liage  Soit  accorde  a  Sa  femme  en  faveur 
dune  maison  que  M^  Butau  Son  pere  a  vendu  au  S^  Lacroix 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1783  147 

At  a  Court,  May  8. 
President,  Bte.  Dubuque.         Bte.  Alarie. 
Bte.  Baron.  Gabriel  Baron. 

Present. 
A  petition  presented  in  Court  by  Philippe  Laflamme  showing 
that  there  never  was  made  in  fact  an  inventory  of  the  property 
left  by  his  father,  the  late  Charles  Laflamme,  when  Marie 
Joseph  Larche  entered  into  second  marriage,  since  his  age  did  not 
permit  him  to  look  after  his  own  interests;  and  he  prays  that  a 
curator  be  elected  and  the  said  inventory  be  made  in  order  to 
arrive  at  a  partition. 

The  Court  granted  the  prayer  of  Philippe  Laflamme. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  the  22nd  of  the  present 
month. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  B.  Dubuque. 

At  a  Court,  May  26,  1783. 
Bte.  Dubuque.  Bte.  Alarie. 

Pierre  Grandmont.  Louis  Lebrun. 

Bte.  Baron.  Gabriel  Baron. 

Present. 
The  Court  assembled  to  receive  the  oaths  of  MM.  Jos. 
Bellefeuil,  Louis  Lebrun,  Fr.  Courier,  Jean  Bte.  Deshayes, 
Ant.  Lamarche,  Pierre  Quenel  and  Jos.  Lapanc^  that  they 
may  take  their  places  as  magistrates,  having  been  elected  by 
the  votes  to  replace  the  former  magistrates.  The  above  men- 
tioned MM.  Bellefeuil,  Lebrun,  Courier,  Deshayes,  Lamar- 
che, Quenel  and  Lapance  appeared  and  took  the  oath  of 
fidelity  and  also  that  of  office  and  took  their  places  as  magis- 
trates. 

At  the  same  Court  Joseph  Traversey  took  the  oath  of  fidelity 
and  of  office  as  bailiff  of  this  Court. 

Fr.  Saucier  took  the  oath  of  fidelity  and  also  that  of  office 
as  clerk  of  the  said  Court. 

At  the  same  Court  a  petition  presented  by  Gabriel  Baron 
both  in  his  name  and  as  having  married  Marie  Louise  Buteau,  in 
which  he  prays  that  the  right  of  lineage  repurchase  of  a  house  be 


148  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Comme  Etant  le  propre  heritage  de  Sa  mere  qui  ne  doit  point 
sortir  de  la  famille  en  remboursant  le  prix  dachat,  aux  meme 
terme  Et  Condition  quil  La  achetd. 

La  Cour  a  ordonnd  que  Gabriel  Baron  aura  La  possession  de 
laditte  maison  Et  remboursera  au  S'^  Lacroix  le  prix  dachat  au 
meme  terme  et  Condition  quil  L  'a  acquis. 

Le  Sieur  Butau  ayant  paru  a  demend^  a  la  Cour  Si  il  Luy 
auroit  Ete  permis  de  ventre  Sa  maison  a  un  de  Ses  Enfans  que  Son 
intention  Etoit  de  le  faire,  mais  ayant  Ecrit  a  M^  Labuxiere  (aufifet 
des  Loix)  a  ce  Sujet  et  quil  luy  auroit  dit  quil  ne  pouvoit  pas  le 
faire. 

La  Cour  a  renvoyd  la  pr^sente  affaire  a  Jeudy  prochain  netant 
point  de  Sa  Competance  ou  L  'on  y  fera  paroitre  Monsieur  Labux- 
iere. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourn^  a  Jeudy  5  Juin. 
fr.  saucier  Greffier  pierre  quenel 

a  une  Cour  du  5  Juin  1783. 
president  pierre  Quenel  Louis  lebrun 

fr.  Courrie  Joseph  lapance 

ant  Lamarche  Joseph  Belief euil 

Jn  B^^  Dehay  Present 

Joseph  Belfeuil  ayant  paru  a  pr^te  le  Serment  de  fidelity,  aux 
Etats,  ainsi  que  Celuy  de  majistrat  Et  a  pris  Sa  place  En  sa  dite 
quality  de  majistrat. 

TRAVERSY  Demendeur  pour  m^  reynal  deffendeur  m^ 

Granmon. 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  le  deffendeur  pour  un  Compte  de  medi- 
cament montant  a  27^^  Le  deffendeur  repond  quil  na  point  de 
Connoissance   du  d^    Compte  qu  'en  partie,  offrant  dans  faire 
Serment. 

La  Cour  a  renvoye  Le  present  procds  a  la  cour  prochaine  ou 
M'^.  reynald  paroirtra  pour  prouver  son  Compte. 

1  The  ''reirait  lignager"  (incorrectly  spelled  in  the  Record)  was  a  survival  in  French  law 
from  more  primitive  times,  when  property  belonged  to  the  family.  After  the  individual's  land 
was  separated  from  that  of  the  family,  it  might  be  alienated  by  sale,  but  according  to  the 
right  of  retraii  lignager  the  nearest  of  kin  might  repurchase  the  land  by  repaying  the  purchase 
money.     Other  methods  of  alienation  of  land  were  not  subject  to  this  right.     The  retrait 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1783  149 

granted  to  his  wife.^  The  petitioners  explain  that  their  father 
sold  the  house  to  M.  LaCroix,  although  it  was  the  heritage  of 
their  mother  and  should  not  have  gone  out  of  the  family;  and 
that  they  are  ready  to  pay  back  to  M.  LaCroix  the  purchase 
money  on  the  same  terms  and  conditions  that  he  bought  it. 

The  Court  ordered  that  Gabriel  Baron  shall  have  the  possession 
of  the  said  house  and  shall  repay  to  M.  LaCroix  the  purchase 
price  on  the  same  terms  and  conditions,  that  he  bought  it. 

M.  Buteau  appeared  and  asked  the  Court  if  he  would  be  per- 
mitted to  sell  his  house  to  one  of  his  children.  He  says  that  he 
intended  to  do  so,  but  wrote  on  the  subject  to  M.  Labuxiere,  who 
is  acquainted  with  the  law,  and  who  said  that  he  could  not  do  so.^ 
The  Court,  not  being  competent  to  answer,  postponed  the 
present  affair  to  next  Thursday,  at  which  time  they  will  have  M. 
Labuxiere  appear. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  June  5. 
Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  Pierre  Quenel. 

At  a  Court,  June  5,  1783. 
President  Pierre  Quenel.  Louis  Lebrun. 

Fr.  Courier.  Joseph  Lapancd. 

Ant.  Lamarche.  Joseph  Belief euil. 

Jn.  Bte.  Deshayes.  Present. 

Joseph  Bellefeuil  appeared  and  took  the  oath  of  fidelity  to  the 
States  and  also  that  of  magistrate  and  took  his  place  as  magistrate. 
Traversy,  Plaintiff  for  M.  Reynal, 

vs.  M.  Grandmont,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  an  account  for  medicine 
amounting  to  27  livres.    The  defendant  answers  that  he  has  no 
knowledge  of  the  said  accoimt  except  in  part,  and  offers  to  take 
his  oath  thereto. 

The  Court  continued  the  present  suit  to  the  next  Court,  when 
M.  Reynal  will  appear  to  prove  his  bill. 

lignager  was  abolished  in  July,  1790. — De  Farriere,  Coutume  de  Paris,  ii.,  587  et  seq.; 
Viollet,  Hist,  du  droit  civil  Frangais,  609;  Glasson,  Hist,  du  droit  et  des  institutions  de  la 
France,  vii.,  561  et  seq. 

2  Probably  because  of  the  complexity  of  legal  rights  growing  out  of  the  union  of  two  or 
more  commimities  of  goods. 


I50  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Demendeur  traversy  pour  M.  reynal  deffendeur,  M^*. 
Henson 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  le  deffendeur  pour  une  Somme  de 
Cent  huit  livres  suivant  un  Compte  de  medicament  pour  la  maladie 
de  feu  Son  marie  Et  pour  Eux. 

le  deffendeur  a  Ette  assigne  de  paroitre  pour  deffendre  Sa 
Cause  Et  nayant  point  paru  La  Cour  a  ordonne  que  led^^  [sic] 
deffendeur  pay  era  Le  demendeur  Suivant  son  Compte. 

Demendeur  B*^  dumay     Deffendeur  pierre  malet 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  le  deffendeur  disant  quil  auroit  at- 
trapd  un  poullin  au  bout  de  la  prairie  de  legle  Sous  le  pretex  dit 
il  quil  le  Croyoit  maron  Et  Comme  Se  poulin  n  'a  Ete  reclame 
de  personne  Et  que  le  demendeur  a  En  perdu  un  de  meme  age 
Et  Couleur  en  Consequence  il  p'roduit  a  la  Cour  deux  Sertificat 
qui  disent  avoir  vue  a  la  Suitte  de  la  Jument  du  demendeur  un 
pareil  poulin  de  meme  age  Et  Couleur  que  celuy  que  le  deffendeur 
a  attrap^. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  au  deffendeur  a  livrer  au  demendeur  Led* 
poulin,  Comme  paroissant  luy  appartenir  Et  a  deffendu  aud* 
deffendeur  de  ne  prendre  aucun  animal  Dans  la  Comune  point 
marque  qui  ne  Soit  Bien  Sur  quil  luy  appartienne  nayant  Eu 
aucun  droit  de  prendre  celuy  cy,  Et  au  deffendeur  a  payer 
Les  fraix. 

a  une  meme  Cour  une  requette  presente  par  Gabriel  Baron 
Et  sa  femme  qui  demende  Lexecution  de  la  Sentance  rendu  par 
laditte  Cour  au  Bas  dune  requette  qui  demende  le  retrait  Lignager 
des  Biens  fonds  vendu  par  le  S^  Butau  Leur  pere  au  S^  Lacroix. 

En  Consequence  la  Cour  a  ordonne  quil  Sera  Sinifie  au  Sieur 
turgeon  de  Deguerpir  de  laditte  maison  Sans  delay  moyenant  que 
les  retreyanc  luy  fourniront  un  Logement  pour  trois  mois  telle  que 
led*  Baron  loffre  dans  Sa  ditte  requette  En  datte  de  Ce  Jour,  notre 
oppignon  Etant  qui  ne  Soit  pas  necessaire  quil  Soit  nomes  arbi- 
trages, La  Loix  Decidant  Clerment  de  Ce  Cas. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourn^  a  Jeudy  2^^  de  Juillet. 

fr.  saucier  Clark  pierre  quenel  president 

1  See  supra,  p.  149. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1783  151 

Traversy,  Plaintiff  for  M.  Reynal, 

vs.  Madame  Henson,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  the  sum  of  one  hundred 
and  eight  livres  according  to  an  account  for  medicine  for  the 
sickness  of  her  late  husband  and  for  herself. 

The  defendant  was  summoned  to  appear  and  defend  her  cause ; 
and  not  appearing,  the  Court  ordered  that  the  said  defendant 
shall  pay  the  plaintiff  according  to  his  account. 

Bte.  Dumay,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Mallet,  Defendant, 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant,  saying  that  the  latter  had 
caught  a  colt  at  the  end  of  the  Eagle  Prairie  pretending  that  he 
believed  it  wild;  and  since  this  colt  had  been  reclaimed  by  no 
one  and  the  plaintiff  had  lost  one  of  the  same  age  and  color,  he 
produced  in  Court  two  certificates  from  persons,  who  said  that 
they  had  seen  following  the  plaintiff's  mare  a  similar  colt  of  the 
same  age  and  color  as  that  which  the  defendant  caught. 

The  Court  ordered  the  defendant  to  deliver  to  the  plaintiff 
the  said  colt,  since  it  appeared  to  belong  to  him,  and  forbade 
the  defendant  to  take  in  the  commons  any  immarked  animal  which 
he  was  not  sure  belonged  to  him,  as  he  had  no  right  to  take 
this  one ;  and  ordered  the  defendant  to  pay  the  costs. 

At  the  same  Court  a  petition  presented  by  Gabriel  Baron  and 
his  wife,  in  which  they  pray  for  the  execution  of  the  judgment 
rendered  by  the  said  Court  at  the  bottom  of  a  petition  demanding 
the  right  of  lineage  repurchase  of  the  landed  property,  which  was 
sold  by  M.  Buteau,  their  father,  to  M.  Lacroix.^ 

Accordingly  the  Court  decreed  that  notice  shall  be  given  M. 
Turgeon  to  give  up  the  possession  of  the  said  house  without  de- 
lay, in  return  for  which  the  repurchasers  shall  furnish  him  lodgings 
for  three  months,  such  as  the  said  Baron  offers  in  the  said 
petition  dated  this  day.  It  is  our  opinion  it  is  not  necassary  to 
name  arbitrators,  since  the  law  decides  clearly  in  this  case.^ 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  July  2. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  Pierre  Quenel,  President. 

2  One  of  the  few  cases  where  a  body  of  law  is  mentioned.  In  this  case  the  law  referred 
to  is  the  Couiume  de  Paris. 


152  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

a  une  Cour  du  ii  Juin  par  Extraordinaire. 
La  Cour  a  Ete  assemble  au  nom  du  public  pour  chaq  'un  faire 
Borner  une  quantity  de  terre  dans  la  prairie  du  pont,  Chaq  'un 
Suivant  leur  Besoin  pour  la  culture,  ainsi  que  pour  La  Comune. 
La  Cour  a  desside,  unanimement,  quil  Sera  Dressd  une  acte  Das- 
semble  Signe  des  habitant  ou  les  Limites  des  terres,  Et  autre  Con- 
ventions Seront  prescritte. 

a  une  Cour  du  3*®  Juillet  1783. 
president  pierre  quenel  J.  B*®  dehay 

fr.  Courie  Louis  lebrun 

ant.  Lamarche  Pres* 

Demendeur  Clatjde  Gagn^  Deffendeur  J  B*®  Gaff^ 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  le  deffendeur  pour  une  Somme  de^ 
Cent  Cinquante  livres  En  pelleterie  pour  avoir  Et^  Engag^  par 
M.  Brisbois  son  Comis  pour  aler  Jusq'ua  chicagou  Suivant  le 
mandat  tirr^  Sur  luy  par  son  dit  Comis. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  quil  n'avoit  point  autoris^  Son  Comis 
a  Engag^  personne  luy  ayant  donn^  le  monde  necessaire  pour 
le  voyage  Et  que  led*  Demendeur  auroit  Son  recour  sur  son  Com- 
mis  pour  laditte  Somme  de  Cinquante  Ecus,  Exept^  trente  livres 
En  argent  que  le  demendeur  a  Etd  Convenu  D'avoir  pour  aller 
Jusq'ua  payssa. 

La  Cour  a  Condann^  le  deffendeur  a  payer  au  demendeur  La 
Somme  de  Cinquante  Ecus  Suivant  L'engagement  du  demendeur 
par  M.  BrisBois  Son  Commis  pour  avoir  Ete  Jusqua  chicagou  y 
mener  Ses  voiture,  Sauf  au  Deffendeur  a  avoir  recour  Sur  son 
Commis  si  il  y  a  Eu  tor  de  le  faire,  Et  a  payer  les  Fraix. 
La  Cour  Est  ajourne  aux  7^^  aoust. 
fr.  saucier  Greffier,  pierre  quenel 

1  There  are  printed  in  this  volume  several  documents  in  regard  to  the  settlement  of  Prairie 
du  Pont.  The  right  of  the  villagers  to  the  land  rested  on  a  concession  made  to  the  Seminary 
of  Foreign  Missions  on  June  22,  1722.  The  villagers  were  obliged  to  defend  their  rights 
against  several  other  claimants,  but  finally  the  land  was  confirmed  to  them  by  the  United  States. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1783  153 

At  a  special  session  of  the  Court,  June  11. 

The  Court  was  assembled  in  the  name  of  the  public  in  order 
to  have  each  establish  the  boundaries  of  a  quantity  of  land  in  the 
Prairie  du  Pont  according  to  his  needs  for  cultivation,  and  also 
to  lay  out  the  commons.  The  Court  decided  unanimously  that 
there  shall  be  drawn  up  an  act  of  assembly  signed  by  the  inhabi- 
tants, in  which  the  limits  of  the  lands  and  other  agreements 
shall  be  written.^ 

At  a  Court,  July  3,  1783. 
President,  Pierre  Quenel.  J.  Bte.  Deshayes. 

Fr.  Courier.  Louis  Lebrun. 

Ant.  Lamarche.  Present. 

Claude  Gagne,  Plaintiff,  vs.  J.  Bte.  Gaffe,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  a  sum  of  one  hundred  and 
fifty  livres  in  peltries  for  a  trip  to  Chicago,  for  which  he  was  hired 
by  M.  Brisbois,  the  defendant's  clerk,  according  to  a  draft 
drawn  on  the  defendant  by  the  said  clerk. 

The  defendant  answers  that  he  did  not  authorize  his  clerk  to 
engage  any  one,  since  he  had  furnished  him  the  men  necessary  for 
the  journey;  and  that  the  said  plaintiff  should  have  recourse  against 
his  clerk  for  the  said  sum  of  fifty  ecus^  except  thirty  livres  in  cash, 
which  the  plaintiff  has  agreed  to  pay  him  for  going  to  Payssa.^ 

The  Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay  the  plaintiff  fifty 
ecusj  in  accordance  with  the  agreement  with  the  plaintiff  made 
by  M.  Brisbois,  the  defendant's  clerk,  for  conducting  his  boats 
to  Chicago,  reserving  to  the  plaintiff  the  right  of  recourse  against 
his  clerk,  if  there  was  wrong  in  making  the  agreement,  and  to 
pay  the  costs. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  August  7. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  Pierre  Quenel. 

Amer.  Stale  Papers,  Public  Lands,  ii.,  194;  this  vol.,  pp.  88,  581.     The  court  parceled  the 
land  among  those  who  wished  to  settle  there.      See  below,  pp.  159,  565,  591. 

2  Situated^about  opposite  the  mouth  of  the  Missouri  River. 


154  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

a  une  Cour  du  4  gbre  1783. 
President  pierre  Quenel  Louis  lebrun 

fr.  Courier  Jos^  Lapance 

ant.  Lamarche  Pres. 

Demendeur  Clement  alary  Deffendeur  Joseph  Cecire 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  le  deffendeur  Disant  quayant  Eu  Son 
Enfant  ches  luy  auquel  Sa  femme  auroit  porte  tons  ses  soin 
pendant  lespace  de  Six  mois  Et  au  bout  duquel  tems  il  auroit 
retirer  son  d^  Enfant.  Sans  vouloir  payer  aud*  demendeur  Se 
qui  convient  pour  Ses  peines. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  Si  il  a  Donne  son  Enfans  a  la  femme 
du  Demendeur  que  Ce  na  Ete  que  par  les  Solisitation  de  la  femme 
du  demendeur  de  prendre  Son  Enfans.  disant  que  Cetoit  le 
dernier  Service  quelle  pouvoit  rendre  a  Sa  mere  delver  Son  Enfans. 
Et  quil  ne  luy  en  Couteroit  rien.  Et  que  neanmoins  Son  inten- 
tion netoit  pas  de  lesser  Son  Enfans  Sans  Satisfaire  les  personnes 
qui  En  prenoit  Soin. 

La  Cour  a  Condanner  le  Deffendeur  a  payer  Six  cent  Livres 
de  farine  pour  Les  Six  mois  que  Son  Enfans  a  Ete  ches  le  demen- 
deur. Et  a  payer  Les  fraix. 

Demendeur  m^^^  durand    deffendeur  fr  arnous 

le  demendeur  poursuit  le  deffendeur  disant  quayant  Engage 
le  deffendeur  pour  aller  dans  riviere  des  Illinois  moyenant  un 
Cheval  quil  luy  donnoit  a  Son  retour.  mais  qu'en  ayant  ref ue  un 
dans  la  riviere  des  Illinois  duquel  il  etoit  Contant,  Et  qu'apres 
il  auroit  dit  au  nome  Laforce  charge  de  faire  La  traitte  pour  le 
demendeur  que  Si  il  vouloit  traitter  un  Cheval  que  les  Sauvages 
avoit  amene  a  eux  [  ?],  quil  le  changeroit  avec  durant,  moyenent  du 
retour,  En  consequence  led*  cheval  auroit  Etoit  achete  par  led* 
Laforce  Et  qu'apres  il  auroit  Commender  aud*  francois  de  L' aller 
En  ferger  a  luar  Et  de  revenir  Ensuitte  au  Canot  Et  a  la 
traitte,  Et  que  pandant  Ce  tems  led*  Cheval  auroit  Ete  voler  par 
les  Sauvages.  Et  demende  Que  le  cheval  luy  Soit  paye  par  led* 
francois  ou  laforce. 

Le  Deffendeur  repond  qu'en  Effet  il  auroit  dit  au  nome  Laf- 
force  quil  Changeroit  Led*  Cheval  avec  durant,  Si  il  le  vouloit 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMER,  1783  155 

At  a  Court,  November  4,  1783. 
President,  Pierre  Quenel.  Louis  Lebrun. 

Fr.  Courier.  Jos.  Lapance. 

Ant.  Lamarche.  Present. 

Clement  Alarie,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Joseph  Cesirre,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  saying  that  he  has  had  the 
latter's  child  at  his  house,  and  that  his  wife  gave  it  all  her  care 
for  the  space  of  six  months  and  at  the  end  of  that  time  the  de- 
fendant had  taken  his  child  away  without  being  willing  to  pay 
what  is  right  for  their  trouble. 

The  defendant  answers  that  if  he  gave  his  child  to  the  defend- 
ant's wife,  it  was  only  because  of  her  earnest  request  to  take  the 
child,  saying  that  the  last  service  she  could  render  its  mother 
was  to  bring  up  her  child;  and  she  said  that  it  would  cost  him 
nothing;  and  yet  he  said  that  it  was  not  his  intention  to  leave  his 
child  at  the  plaintiff's  without  satisfying  those  who  took  care  of  it. 

The  Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay  six  hundred 
pounds  of  flour  for  the  six  months  that  his  child  was  at  the 
plaintiff's  and  to  pay  the  costs, 

Marie  Durand,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Fr.  Arnoux,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant,  saying  that  he  had  engaged 
the  defendant  to  go  to  the  Illinois  river  in  return  for  a  horse, 
which  he  gave  him  upon  his  return;  but  that  he  had  received 
one,  with  which  he  was  content,  at  the  Illinois  River;  and  that 
after  he  had  said  to  the  named  Laforce,  who  was  commissioned 
to  conduct  the  trade  for  the  plaintiff,  that  if  he  wished  to  trade 
for  a  horse,  which  the  savages  had  brought  them,  that  he 
would  trade  it  with  Durand  and  get  something  to  boot,  the 
said  horse  had  been  bought  by  the  said  Laforce  in  conse- 
quence; and  afterwards  the  latter  had  ordered  the  said  Francois 
to  go  and  tie  it  with  withes  and  return  immediately  to  the  canoe 
and  to  his  business;  and  that  during  this  time  the  said  horse  had 
been  stolen  by  the  savages;  and  he  demands  that  he  be  paid  for 
the  horse  either  by  the  said  Francois  or  Laforce. 

The  defendant  answers  that  as  a  matter  of  fact  he  had  said  to 
the  named  Laforce  that  he  would  exchange  the  said  horse  with 


iS6  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

mais  que  Comme  durant  ny  Etoit  point  il  nont  fait  auq'un 
Echange  Sertin  Et  quil  avoit  a  Get  Effets  Executer  Les  ordre 
dud*  Laforce,  quil  avoit  misle  d*  cheval  ou  il  luy  avoit  Ete  ordonn^ 
Et  quapres  Etre  revenu  au  Canot  led*  Cheval  auroit  ete  repris  par 
les  Sauvages  Suivant  Comme  il  paroit  puisquil  na  pas  pu  le 
retrouver  Et  dit  quil  ne  pouvoit  pas  En  repondre  ayant  fait  Ce 
qu'on  luy  avoit  ordonn^. 

La  Cour  a  Condanne  led*  demendeur  a  payer  au  deffendeur 
un  Cheval  tel  quil  Est  Convenu  Sauf  avoir  Son  recour  sur  led* 
Laforce  Si  il  a  manqu^  a  ce  quil  Etoit  oblig^  de  faire  En  Sa -place 
Et  a  payer  Les  fraix. 

fr.  saucier,  Grefl&er  pierre  quenel 

a  une  Cour  du  4  septbre  1783. 
President  pierre  Quenel  Louis  lebrun 

francois  Couri^  Jos^  Lapanc^ 

ant.  Lamarche  Pres* 

une  representation  fait  a  la  cour  par  Mons.  trottier  disans  que 
Sur  les  defifences  qui  ont  Ete  faitte  par  la  ditte  Cour  de  traitter  de 
leau  de  vie  au  Sauvages  dans  le  village  sous  peines  de  Confisca- 
tion, Et  quayant  Su  par  des  plainte  qu'on  luy  a  porte  que  M^ 
Isaac  Levy  a  fait  fait  [sic]  traitter  dans  le  village  Et  enivre  tons 
Les  Sauvages  il  auroit  fait  Saisir  un  tierson  de  tafia  ches  m'"  Levy, 
Et  Comme  il  n'en  a  fait  auq'un  usage,  il  demande  a  laditte  Cour 
ce  quelle  ordonnera  a  ce  Sujet  La  Cour  a  authorize  M^  trottier  a 
faire  Ce  quil  jugera  a  propos  a  Ce  Sujet  vue  quil  n'a  fait  quex- 
ecuter  Les  deffence  qui  ont  Ete  fait  pour  Ce  Sujet. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  Jeudy  2®  8^^^. 

f.  saucier  Greffier  pierre  quenel 

a  une  Cour  du  29  Janvier  1784. 
Presid*  J.  B*^  Lacroix  J^  Lapancd 

Jo^i  Belfeuil  J  B*^  Dehay 

Louis  lebrun  Present, 

une  requette  presente  par  m^  ant  Girardin  demandant  que 
Chaque  habitant  fasse  chaq'un  Leur  cloture  Des  terre  quils  ont 

1  I  have  found  no  explanation  for  the  cessation  of  the  meetings  of  the  court  between 
September  and  January.     President  Quenel  died  during  this  period. 


COURT  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1783  157 

Durand,  if  he  wished  it,  but  as  Durand  was  not  there,  they  have 
not  made  any  certain  trade;  and  that  he  had  in  these  matters 
executed  the  orders  of  the  said  Laforce,  and  had  put  the  said  horse, 
where  he  was  ordered;  and  after  he  returned  to  the  canoe, 
the  said  horse  had  been  retaken  by  the  savages,  as  it  appeared, 
since  he  could  not  find  it;  and  he  said  that  he  could  not  be  held 
responsible,  since  he  had  done  what  they  ordered. 

The  Court  condemned  the  said  plaintiff  to  pay  the  defendant 
a  horse,  such  as  he  had  agreed  to  give,  reserving  to  him  recourse 
against  the  said  Laforce,  if  he  has  failed  in  what  he  was  bound 
to  do  in  his  place;  and  to  pay  the  costs. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  Pierre  Quenel. 

At  a  Court,  September  4,  1783. 
President,  Pierre  Quenel.  Louis  Lebrun. 
Francois  Courier.  Jos.  Lapance. 

Ant.  Lamarche.  Present. 

A  report  made  to  the  Court  by  M.  Trottier,  in  which  he  says 
that  on  account  of  the  prohibitions  which  were  made  by  the  said 
Coiurt  in  regard  to  trading  in  liquors  with  the  savages  in  the  vil- 
lage under  pain  of  confiscation,  and  because  he  had  learned  from 
complaints  made  to  him  that  M.  Isaac  Levy  was  carrying  on 
trade  in  the  village  and  intoxicating  all  the  savages,  he  had  caused 
the  seizure  of  a  cask  of  tafia  at  the  house  of  M.  Levy;  and  as  he 
has  made  no  other  use  of  it,  he  asked  the  said  Court  what  it  will 
decree  on  this  subject.  The  Court  authorized  M.  Trottier  to  do 
what  he  shall  judge  best  in  this  matter  seeing  that  he  had  only 
put  into  execution  the  prohibition  which  had  been  made. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  October  2. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk.  Pierre  Quenel. 

At  a  Court,  January  29,  1784.^ 
President,  J.  Bte  LaCroix.       J.  Lapancd. 
Jos.  Bellefeuil.  Jean  Bte.  Deshayes. 

Louis  Lebrun.  Present. 

A  petition  presented  by  M.  Ant.  Girardin,  in  which  he  prays 
that  each  inhabitant  should  make  his  own  fence  along  the  front 
of  the  land  which  he  has  taken  up  in  Prairie  du  Pont,  and  that  the 


158  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

pris  dans  la  prairie  du  ponds  Et  chaq'un  Sur  La  deventure  a 
leur  terre  Et  que  la  Cour  aye  a  ordonne  auxd**  habitant  un  terns 
fixe  pour  lad**^  cloture  Et  que  les  vielle  Cloture  du  cul  de  Sac  Se 
releve  pour  Etre  transports  au  bout  des  autres. 

La  Cour  a  ordonnd  que  chaque  habitant  qui  ont  pris  des  terres 
dans  La  prairie  du  pond  y  fasse  Leur  Cloture  dicy  a  la  fin  d'avril, 
Et  Quetant  qu'au  trensport  des  vielle  Cloture  il  En  cera  decide 
par  la  pluralite  des  voix  des  habitant  qui  ont  des  terres  dans  le  cul 
de  Sac  pour  Eviter  toutte  dificulte. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  Jeudy  5  de  fevrier  1784. 
a  une  Cour  du  i  avril,  1784. 
Pres^*  J.  B^^  Lacroix  Louis  lebrun 

fr.  Courrie  J^  Lapance 

ant  Lamarche  J^  Belfeuil 

J.  B*^  Dehay  Present 

La  Etant  assemble  pour  prendre  le  Serment  de  fidelite  ainsi 
que  celuy  d'huissier  de  la  Cour.  de  Gaspar  Marchand. 

Gaspar  Marchand  ayant  paru  a  prete  Serment  de  fidelte  ainsi 
que  Celuy  Dhuissie  de  la  Cour. 

Demendeur  B^^  dumay  Deffendeur  pierre  malet 

Le  demendeur  fait  Sa  representation  a  la  cour  Contre  Le 
Deffendeur  disant  qu'en  vertu  d'une  santance  rendu  le  5  de 
Juin  Dernier  Contre  led^  Deffendeur  au  Sujet  d'un  Cheval  quil 
a  Ete  ConDanne  par  Laditte  Sentance  a  Luy  rendre  Et  quapres 
il  auroit  Change  pour  une  vache,  mais  quil  y  a  quelque  Jour  que 
led^  Deffendeur  Est  venu  ches  Luy  prendre  Laditte  vache  malgrS 
Luy  Et  la  mene  ches  Thomas  Brady. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  que  la  vache  du  demendeur  Soyt  par  Le 
demendeur  remene  a  I'endroit  ou  Elle  a  Ete  prise,  Sous  vingt 
quatre  heurs  Et  Condanne  a  paye  tout  fray  Depend  domage  Et 
interet,  Et  En  outre  Laditte  vache  Sur  Ses  risques  Jusqua  ce  quelle 
Soit  remiser. 

Demandeur  J.  B^^  Gaffe'  Deffendeur  Th.  Brady 

a  une  meme  Cour  Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur 
disant,  quil  auroit  a  la  demende  dud*  deffendeur  Lessd  son  cheval 

1  See  supra  p.  152,  note  i. 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1784  159 

Court  should  fix  for  the  said  inhabitants  a  limit  of  time  to  make 
the  said  fence;  and  that  the  old  fence  of  the  ctd  de  sac  be  taken 
up  and  moved  to  the  end  of  the  others. 

The  Court  decreed  that  each  inhabitant,  who  has  taken  up 
land  in  the  Prairie  du  Pont,  should  build  his  fence  there  between 
now  and  the  end  of  April;  and,  in  order  to  avoid  all  difficulties, 
that  it  shall  be  decided  by  the  plurality  of  the  votes  of  the  inhabi- 
tants, who  have  land  in  the  cul  de  sac,  in  regard  to  removing 
the  old  fence.  ^ 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  February  5,  1784. 
At  a  Court,  April  i,  1784. 
President,  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.  Louis  Lebrun. 
Fr.  Courier.  Jos.  Lapance.  . 

Ant.  Lamarche.  J.  Bellefeuil. 

Jean  Bte.  Deshayes.  Present. 

The  Court  assembled  to  receive  the  oath  of  fidelity  and  also 
that  of  huissier  of  the  Court  from  Gaspard  Marchand. 

Gaspard  Marchand  appeared  and  took  the  oath  of  fidelity 
and  also  that  of  huissier  of  the  Court. 

Bte.  Dumay,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Mallet,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  makes  his  representation  to  the  Court  against 
the  defendant,  in  which  he  says  that,  by  virtue  of  a  decree 
rendered  the  5th  of  June  last  against  the  said  defendant,  he  had 
been  condemned  to  deliver  to  the  plaintiff  a  horse,  which  after- 
wards the  latter  had  exchanged  for  a  cow;  but  that  a  few  days 
ago  the  said  defendant  came  to  his  house  and  took  the  said 
cow  in  spite  of  him  and  had  led  it  to  Thomas  Brady's. 

The  Court  decreed  that  the  plaintiff's  cow  be  brought  back 
within  twenty-four  hours  by  the  defendant  to  the  place  from  which 
he  had  taken  it;  and  condemned  him  to  pay  all  costs,  expenses, 
damages  and  interest;  and  furthermore  that  he  should  be  respon- 
sible for  the  cow  until  it  was  returned. 

J.  Bte.  Gaffe,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Thomas  Brady,  Defendant. 

At  the  same  Court  the  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant,  saying  that 
he  had,  at  the  request  of  the  said  defendant,  left  his  horse  in 
the  latter 's  care  at  his  house,  on  condition  that  he  would  take 


i6o  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

pour  en  prendre  soin  ches  Luy  Sous  Les  Condition  quil  prendroit 
trois  voyage  de  foin  dans  La  Grange  de  B*^  Saucier.  Et  quapres 
40  ou  45  Jour  il  Luy  auroit  rendu  son  d*  Cheval  disant  quil 
n'avoit  plus  de  foin.  En  Consequence  Le  demendeur  represente 
quil  nest  pas  possible  quen  ci  peu  de  terns  Son  cheval  aye  pue 
menger  tout  Ce  foin  Et  quen  outre,  il  auroit  Ete  deja  arbitrer  pour 
Cette  affaire  par  les  Sieurs  J.  B*®  Lacroix  pascal  Pillet  Henry 
Biron  Et  Joseph  Bissonette  ou  led*  deffendeur  naurait  pas  voulu 
paroitre  que  Dans  les  deux  voyage  de  foin  que  led*  deffendeur 
avoit  Enleve  il  En  pouvoit  avoir  le  moin  trois  Edemy  [sic]  par  le 
terns  quil  a  Etd  Dans  La  grande  Et  vue  La  differance  quil  y  a 
venant  des  champs. 

Le  deffendeur  ne  repond  autre  Chose  Sinon  quil  Luy  Soit  per- 
mis  de  nomer  Des  arbitres  ainsi  que  sa  partie  adverse  pour  decider 
Leur  Differanc.  La  Cour  a  accordd  a  sa  demende  Et  ardonn^ 
[sic]  que  Celuy  qui  perderoit  par  Larbitrage  payeroit  Les  fraix 
de  Justice. 

La  Cour  Est  ajournd  au  6  de  may  prochain. 
fr  saucier  Greffier  J  B  H  LaCroix 

a  une  Cour  du  13^®  avril  1784  Par  Extraordinaire. 
President  J  B*^  Lacroix  Louis  lebrun 

ant  Lamarche  Jo^  Lapance 

J  B*^  Dehay  J^  Belfeuil 

Presente 

une  requette  repr^sentd  par  philipe  Gervais  disant  qu'au  nom 
Et  Comme  Subroge  tuteur  de  leon  lepage  il  demende  quil  soit 
nome  une  personne  pour  faire  Le  recouvrement  de  L'encan 
presentement  Echu. 

La  Cour  a  ordonn^  quil  soit  fait  une  assemble  de  parans  Et 
damis  pour  le  Contenue  En  La  ditte  requette. 

^  The  method  of  arbitration  for  ending  htigation  was  very  comrnon  under  French  law, 
and  frequent  examples  of  the  procedure  occur  in  the  Record.  The  great  majority  of  civil 
suits  might  be  arbitrated,  exceptions  being  such  as  the  spiritual  rights  of  benefices,  the 
status  of  persons,  validity  of  marriages,  etc.  It  was  required  that  both  parties  agree  to 
submit^  their  dispute  to  arbitrators,  who  were  obliged  to  render  their  decision  within  a 
determined  time.  One  or  more  persons  were  chosen  by  the  parties  to  act  in  this  capacity. 
These  were  empowered,  if  the  number  of  arbitrators  was  even,  to  choose  another  All  free 
males  of  sound  mind  and  of  age  might  act,  but  judges  in  whose  court  the  suit  was  pending 
were  debarred.  As  far  as  the  persons  of  the  litigants  and  the  question  in  dispute  were  con- 
cerned the  arbitrators  had  the  same  powers  as  judges;  but  they  could  not  constrain  witnesses 
to  appear  before  them.     They  might  base  their  decision  on  other  considerations  than  exact 


GOURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1784  161 

three  loads  of  hay  in  Bte.  Saucier's  barn;  and  that  after  40  or 
45  days  he  had  brought  the  horse  back  to  him,  saying  that  he 
had  no  more  hay.  Accordingly  the  plaintiff  shows  that  it  is 
impossible  that  his  horse  could  have  eaten  in  so  short  a  time 
all  that  hay;  and  furthermore  that  this  cause  would  have  been 
already  arbitrated  by  MM.  J.  Bte.  LaCroix,  Pascal  Pillet,  Henry 
Biron  and  Joseph  Bissonette,  if  the  defendant  had  not  been 
unwilling  to  appear.  Furthermore  he  says  that  the  defendant 
could  have  taken  three  and  a  half  loads  of  hay  in  the  two  load- 
ings, judging  by  the  time  it  had  been  in  the  barn  and  considering 
the  difference  there  is  between  such  and  that  coming  from  the 
fields. 

The  defendant  makes  no  other  answer  than  to  request  that 
he  be  permitted  to  name  arbitrators,  as  well  as  his  opponent,  to 
decide  their  difference.  The  Court  granted  his  request  and 
ordered  that  the  one  losing  by  arbitration  should  pay  the  costs  of 
justice.^ 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  6th  of  May  next. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

At  a  special  session  of  the  Court,  AprD  13,  1784. 

President,  J.  Bte.  LaCroix.       Louis  Lebrun. 

Ant.  Lamarche.  Jos.  Lapancd. 

J.  Bte.  Deshayes.  Jos.  Bellefeuil. 

Present. 
A  petition  presented  by  Philippe  Gervais,  in  which  he  says  that 
in  the  name  and  as  surrogate  guardian  of  Leon  Lepage  he  prays 
that  there  be  named  some  one  to  make  recovery  of  the  notes  given 
at  the  auction,  now  due.^ 

The  Court  ordered  that  there  be  held  an  assembly  of  relatives 
and  friends  to  decide  on  what  is  contained  in  this  petition. 

justice.  They  might,  also,  make  either  of  the  litigants  take  oath  and  permit  their  decision  to 
turn  thereon,  as  did  the  judges.  They  had  no  power  to  put  their  verdict  into  execution.  This 
was  done  by  the  judge  who  confirmed  it.  Appeal  was  permitted  to  either  party,  provided  he 
had  not  signed  the  verdict.  Jousse,  Traitte  de  I'admtnistration  de  la  justice,  II.,  683  et  seq. 
This  method  of  deciding  suits,  to  which  the  French  were  accustomed,  was  adopted  by 
the  British  commandants  in  the  Northwest,who  were  empowered  by  their  government  to  take 
charge  of  both  the  military  and  civil  matters  in  their  localities. — Howard,  Local  Constitutional 
History  of  the  United  Slates,  i.,  430. 

2  It  appears  to  have  been  the  common  custom  to  give  credit  to  the  purchasers  of  goods  at 
auctions. 


i62  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

a  une  meme  Cour  une  requette  presente  par  mad^  veuve  Le- 
page demendant  de  ce  decharge  de  la  tutelle  des  mineurs  Barsa- 
lous  dont  Son  deffunt  marie  Etoit  Charge. 

La  Cour  ayant  Examine  que  les  dit  mineurs  Barsalou  nont 
point  de  parans  plus  pres  que  le  S'^  ant  Boyd  Elle  Conclu  quil 
Soit  Charge  de  la  ditte  tutelle  Et  que  m^^  V®  Lepage  En  Soit 
Decharge. 

a  une  meme  Cour  une  requette  presente  par  mad®  G  Blin 
demendant  quil  soit  nome  une  personne  pour  Lexecution  testa- 
mentaire  de  Michel  Gaudimcire  Dont  son  deffunt  marie  Etoit 
Charge. 

La  Cour  ayant  Examine  quil  ny  avoit  personne  plus  Cap- 
able que  M^  J  B^®  Lacroix  pour  substitue  au  Lieu  et  place  du  def . 
Sieur  Blin,  En  Consequence  Elle  la  nome  pour  laditte  Execution. 
Derriendeur  pierre  roy  Deffendeur  Jo^  Lember 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  le  deffendeur  pour  un  Billet  quil  luy 
a  Consenty,  Sous  sa  marque  fait  En  pelleterie,  mais  Comme  Led* 
deffendeur  croyoit  Le  devoir  en  argent,  il  demende  au  deffendeur 
de  faire  Serment  que  les  Effest  quil  luy  a  Vendu  que  Se  soye 
En  pelleterie  quil  Le  Luy  a  vendu  Le  deffendeur  ne  voulant 
pas  faire  serment  a  Diminuer  moitie  Sur  led*  Billet.  Et  Le 
deffendeur  a  payer  Les  fraix. 

a  une  meme  Cour  fr.  Saucier  porte  plainte  que  Bien  Des  per- 
sonne Se  refuse  a  payer  Les  fraix  de  Justice,  En  Consequence  il 
demende  a  la  Cour  quil  Soit  maitre  de  Ce  faire  payer  par  Celuy 
qui  ataquera  quelque  proces  Si  il  Est  plus  En  Etat  de  payer 
ou  maitre  Dexiger  un  Cotion  Des  parties  pour  repoiidre  Des 
fraix  Et  tous  Les  fraix  payer  En  pelleterie  suivant  L'encien 
tarif. 

fr.  saucier  J  B  H  LaCroix. 

1  A  note  for  peltries  was  worth  half  as  much  as  one  for  a  similar  amount  of  money. 
The  connection  of  the  oath  with  the  case  is  not  clear,  but  no  proof  was  needed,  since  the  note 
was  made  out  for  peltriCiS. 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1784  163 

At  the  same  Court  a  petition  presented  by  Madame  Lepage, 
widow,  praying  for  her  discharge  from  the  guardianship  of  the 
minors  Barsalous,  with  which  her  deceased  husband  had  been 
intrusted. 

The  Court  having  inquired  and  learned  that  the  said  minors 
Barsalous  have  no  relative  closer  than  M.  Ant.  Boyer,  decided 
that  he  be  charged  with  the  said  guardianship,  and  that  Madame 
Lepage  be  discharged. 

At  the  same  Court  a  petition  presented  by  Madame  G.  Blin 
praying  that  there  be  named  some  one  to  put  into  execution  the 
will  of  Michel  Guadimcire,  with  which  her  deceased  husband  was 
intrusted. 

The  Court,  after  inquiry,  decided  that  there  was  no  person 
more  fitted  to  be  substituted  for  M.  Blin  than  M.  J.  Bte.  Lacroix, 
and  therefore  appointed  him  to  put  into  execution  the  said  will. 
Pierre  Roy,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jos.  Lember,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  a  note  to  which  he  has 
consented  over  his  mark,  and  which  is  made  out  for  peltries;  but 
as  the  defendant  [plaintiff?]  believes  that  the  debt  is  in  money, 
he  demands  that  the  defendant  make  oath  that  the  goods  which 
the  plaintiff  sold  him  were  sold  for  peltries.  The  defendant 
not  wishing  to  make  oath  has  diminished  his  note  by  half.^ 
The  defendant  was  condemned  to  pay  the  costs. 

At  the  same  Court  Fr.  Saucier  brings  complaint  that  many 
persons  refuse  to  pay  the  costs  of  justice,  and  he  therefore  prays 
the  Court  that  he  be  empowered  to  make  the  party  bringing  any 
suit  pay,  if  he  is  better  able  to  pay,  or  be  empowered  to  exact 
surety  from  the  parties  to  answer  for  the  costs  and  that  all  costs 
be  paid  in  peltries  according  to  the  former  rate.^ 

Fr.  Saucier.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

*  The  practice  of  making  the  most  responsible  party  pay  the  cost  of  the  suit  caused  great 
criticism  at  Vincennes,  but  in  Cahokia  the  rule,  which  commonly  prevailed  from  now  on,  that 
the  successful  litigant  pay  the  costs  and  be  reimbursed  by  the  loser  seems  to  have  worked  with- 
out friction,  or,  at  least,  did  not  hinder  Utigation. 


i64  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Court  du  6^®  may  1784. 
President,  J.  B^®  Lacroix  Louis  lebrun 

fr.  Courri^  Jos^  Lapance 

J  B*®  Dehay  ant.  Lamarche 

Pres* 
Demendeur  J  B*^  Lacroix  Deffendeur  fr.  Gerome 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  pour  une  somme  de 
douze  Livres  quinze  Sols  pour  sa  part  d'un  tier^on  de  vin  Dont 
plusieurs  autres  En  ont  paye  Leur  part  Et  Comme  led^  deffend- 
eur si  Est  trouvd  Le  demendeur  Demende  Egalement  sa  Code 
par. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  Si  paul  poupar  ne  Lut  inviter  de 
Si  trouver  sans  luy  dire  ce  quil  luy  En  couteroit  ni  meme  qui  devoit 
Luy  En  Couter  aucune  chose.  Cest  La  raison  qui  Luy  fait  dire 
qui  ne  veut  rien  payer. 

La  Court  a  ordonne  que  puisque  paul  poupar  Lavoit  invito  a 
venir  Souper  ches  m^  Lacroix  quil  tiendray  Compte  Luy  meme 
de  la  Somme  reclame  par  Le  demendeur,  Et  le  deffendeur  a 
pay^  Les  fraix. 

a  une  meme  Cour  Joseph  Billet  d*  Grolet  Demendeur  poursuit 
charle  Lefevre  deffendeur  pour  La  Somme  de  Cinquante  livres 
pour  saler  d'un  fournau  quil  luy  a  fait. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  le  demendur  na  pas  remplis  Les 
Engagement  quils  avoit  Ensemble  Et  Comme  les  preuve  ne  Sont 
pas  presentes,  ils  demande  que  leur  differends  Soit  decide  par 
Des  arbitres.  La  Cour  a  accordd  a  leur  Demende,  Et  au  perdant  a 
payer  tous  fraix. 

a  une  meme  Cour  Joseph  Cecire  poursuit  pierre  Granmon  au 
Sujet  dune  petite  fille  orpheline  que  prenouvau  Luy  a  Lesser  ches 
luy,  sous  les  Convention  verbal  de  La  Garder  Jusqu'a  ce  quelle 
se  produisse,  Et  que  led*  Granmon  a  retirer  de  ches  Luy. 

pierre  Granmond  ayant  Paru  a  dit  que  led*  prenouvau  luy  a 
lesser  un  pouvoir  de  retirer  Laditte  pettitte  fille  Si  elle  netoit  pas 
Bien  ches  led*  Cecire,  Et  Soffre  a  produire  Led*  pouvoir  Et  Les 
preuve  du  manuvais  traittement  quil  fesoit  a  Laditte  pettitte 
fille. 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1784  165 

At  a  Court,  May  6,  1784. 
President,  J.  Bte.  LaCroix.       Louis  Lebrun. 
Ant.  Lamarche.  Jos.  Lapanc^. 

J.  Bte.  Deshayes.  Fr.  Courier. 

Present. 
J.  Bte.  LaCroix,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Fr.  Gersome,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  the  sum  of  twelve  livres 
fifteen  sols  for  his  share  of  a  cask  of  wine,  for  which  several  others 
have  paid  their  shares;  and,  as  the  said  defendant  was  present, 
the  plaintiff  demands  an  equal  share  from  him. 

The  defendant  answers  that  if  Paul  Poupar  had  not  invited 
him  to  be  present  without  telling  him  what  it  would  cost  him  or 
even  saying  that  it  was  going  to  cost  him  anything;  and  that  is 
the  reason  that  he  said  he  would  pay  nothing. 

The  Court  decreed  that,  since  Paul  Poupar  had  invited  the 
defendant  to  supper  at  M.  LaCroix's,  he  shall  be  held  accountable 
for  the  sum  claimed  by  the  plaintiff.  The  defendant  was  con- 
demned to  pay  the  costs. 

At  the  same  Court  Joseph  Billet  called  Grolet,  plaintiff,  sues 
Charles  Lefevre,  defendant,  for  the  sum  of  fifty  livres  for  wages 
for  work  on  a  kiln,  which  the  defendant  made  for  him. 

The  defendant  answers  that  the  plaintiff  did  not  fulfill  the 
agreement,  which  they  had  made;  and  since  there  are  no  proofs 
to  present,  they  pray  that  their  difference  be  decided  by  arbitra- 
tors. The  Court  granted  their  prayer  and  ordered  the  loser  to 
pay  all  costs. 

At  the  same  Court  Joseph  Cesirre  sues  Pierre  Grandmont  in 
regard  to  a  little  orphan  girl  whom  Prenouvau  left  at  his  house, 
with  the  verbal  agreement  that  he  was  to  keep  her  until  she  could 
support  herself,  and  whom  the  said  Grandmont  has  withdrawn 
from  his  house. 

Pierre  Grandmont  appeared  and  said  that  the  said  Prenouvau 
left  him  the  authority  to  withdraw  the  said  little  girl,  if  she  was  not 
well  treated  at  the  said  Cesirre's,  and  offers  to  produce  the  said 
authority  and  the  proofs  of  bad  treatment,  which  the  plaintiff  gave 
the  little  girl. 


i66  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  qu'a  La  Cour  prochaine  Led*  Granmon 
produissent  ses  preuvent  [sic]  Et  aux  perdans  a  paye  Les  fraix.    ^ 
La  Cour  Et  ajourn^  a  Jeudy  13^^  du  Cour*. 
f.  saucier  Greffier  J  B  H  LaCroix 

a  une  Cour  du  20^®  may  1784. 
President  J.  B*®  Lacroix.  Louis  lebrun. 

fr.  Courie.  Jos^  Lapance 

J.  B*®  Dehay.  ant  Lamarche. 

Pres* 
par  une  Nouvelle  Ellection  pour  remplacer  Les  majistrat  cy 
dessus  Nomme  a  Ette,  nominee  LesSieurs  J.  B*^  Lacroix  J  B*®. 
Saucier,  J  B*^  Dumay,  Joseph  Bissonnette  Louis  Chatel  pierre 
roy,  Et  Louis  pillet. 

J  B*^  Lacroix  B*^  Saucier  B*^  Dumay  Jos^  Bissonnette  Louis 
Chatel  pierre  roy  Et  Louis  pillet  ayant  parus  ont  prete  Serment 
de  fidelite  ainsi  que  celuy  d' office,  Et  ont  pris  Leurs  place  En 
leurs  Qualite  de  majistrats. 

fr.  Saucier  demende  Qu'en  vertu  de  la  Saisie  quil  a  optenu  Sur 
Cent  vingt  Et  une  livres  De  Suif  Et  neuf  pot  Et  painte  d'huille, 
appartenant  a  B*®  Lamarche  D'Etre  hotorize  a  faire  vendre  lesd*' 
articles  pour  Etre  La  Somme  Endoce  sur  son  Billet. 
La  Cour  a  acorde  aud*  fr.  Saucier  sa  Demande. 
La  Cour  Est  ajourne  a  Jeudy  3^^  Juin. 

J  B  H  LaCroix. 

a  une  Cour  du  3^^  Juin  1784. 
President  J  B^^  Lacroix  Jos^  Bissonette 

Pierre  Roy  B*^  Saucier 

J  B*^  Dumay  Louis  chatel 

Present. 
Le    S^  John   Reeve    produit   une    Sentance   arbitrale   Entre 
Luy  Et  Le  S^  pierre  Lagauterie  demandant  Quelle  Soit  approuv^ 
par  La  Cour  Et  mis  en  Execution. 

a  une  meme  Court  Pierre  Prevost  au  nom  Et  Comme  fesant 
pour  Gabriel  Cerre  poursuit  pierre  Lafleur  dans  Sa  requette 
disant  Quetant  Condanne  par  M^  Le  comd*  de  St  Louis  de  faire 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1784  167 

The  Court  decreed  that  at  the  next  Court  the  said  Grandmont 
should  produce  his  proofs,  and  the  loser  was  to  pay  the  costs. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  the  13d  of  the  current  month. 
F.  Saucier.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

At  a  Court,  May  20,  1784. 
President,  J.  Bte.  LaCroix.       Louis  Lebrun. 
Fr.  Courier.  Jos.  Lapanc^. 

J.  Bte.  Deshayes.  Ant.  Lamarche. 

Present. 
To  replace  the  magistrates  above  named  there  have  been 
elected  by  a  new  election  MM.  J.  Bte.  LaCroix,  J.  Bte.  Saucier, 
J.  Bte.  Dumay,  Joseph  Bissonnette,  Louis  Chatel,  Pierre  Roy  and 
Louis  Pillet. 

J.  B.  LaCroix,  Bte.  Saucier,  Bte.  Dumay,  Jos.  Bissonnette,  Louis 
Chatel,  Pierre  Roy  and  Louis  Pillet  appeared  and  took  oath 
of  fidelity  and  also  that  of  office  and  have  taken  their  place  as 
magistrates. 

Fr.  Saucier  prays  that,  in  virtue  of  the  seizure,  which  he  has 
obtained,  of  one  hundred  and  twenty-one  pounds  of  tallow  and 
nine  pots  and  a  pint  of  oil,  belonging  to  Bte.  Lamarche,  he  be 
authorized  to  have  the  said  articles  sold  to  obtain  the  sum 
endorsed  on  his  bill. 

The  Court  granted  Fr.  Saucier  his  prayer. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  June  3. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 
At  a  Coiu-t,  June  3,  1784. 
President  J.  Bte.  LaCroix.        Jos.  Bissonnette. 
Pierre  Roy.  Bte.  Saucier. 

J.  Bte.   Dumay.  Louis  Chatel. 

Present. 
M.  John  Reeve  produces  a  decree  by  arbitration  between  him- 
self and  M.  Pierre  Lagauterie  and  prays  that  it  be  approved  by 
the  Court  and  put  into  execution. 

At  the  same  Court  Pierre  Prevost,  in  the  name  of  and  as  acting 
for  Gabriel  Cerre,  sues  Pierre  Lafleur  in  his  petition,  in  which  he 
says  that  he  [the  plaintifif]  had  been  condemned  bv  the  comman- 


i68  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

racomoder  une  voiture  appartenant  au  S^  Ducharme  Quil  avoit 
pris  dans  La  rivierre  des  Illinois  Et  Sans  ordre,  ou  La  paye,  Si 
elle  Etoit  or  d  Etat  de  PEtre  mais  Quetant  venu  pour  le  faire  Et 
nayant  pas  trouve  Laditte  voiture,  et  ayant  Sur  que  Cetoit  led* 
Lafleur  qui  Lavoit  prise  pour  charoyd  de  la  pierre  pareillement  Sans 
ordre  de  personne  demande  led*  Prevost  que  led*  Lafleur  soit 
Condanner  a  racommoder  lad*®  voiture  ou  La  paye  Si  elle  Est 
or  d  Etat  de  I'etre,  Et  a  tous  depens. 

pierre  Lafleur  repond  quil  Est  vray  quil  a  pris  la  voiture,  mais 
que  Setoit  par  La  permission  de  B*®  Baron  Comme  Croyant 
Lad*'=^  voiture  au  S^  L.  DuCharme. 

B*®  Baron  ayant  paru  a  dit  quil  n' avoit  point  permis  aud* 
Lafleur  de  la  prendre  Quil  Luy  avoit  Seulement  dit  aud*  Lafleur 
de  la  demender  a  Charle  Lefevre  Comme  Luy  ayant  Et6  adress^ 
icy,  mais  disant  toujour  que  led*  Baron  luy  En  avoit  donnd 
La  permission  Et  led*  Baron  disant  toujour  que  non,  led*  Lafleur 
demande  aud*  Baron  son  Serment  Et  qualors  il  Si  Conformera. 

B*®  Baron  ayant  paru  a  fait  Serment  quil  n'avoit  Pas  d*  aud* 
Lafleur  de  prendre  Laditte  voiture  Comme  appartenant  a  M*" 
Ducharme  mais  Quil  luy  Seulement  dit  de  la  demender  a  Ch^® 
Lefevre  Comme  L'ayant  Sous  Sa  garde. 

La  Cour  a  Condanne  led*  Lafleur  a  mettre  La  Ditte  voiture 
En  Etat  de  faire  routte  ou  a  La  payer,  Conformenent  a  la  requette 
dud*  Prevost.  Et  led*  prevost  payera  les  fraix  de  Justice  pour 
Sen  Etre  Servis  Sen  ordre. 

a  une  Cour  du  6^®  de  may  dernier  il  a  Et6  ordonne  que  pierre 
Granmon  produiroit  ses  preuve  pour  avoir  retirer  La  petitte  fille 
de  prenouvau  de  ches  Jos^  Cecire. 

Pierre  Granmon  ayant  paru  a  produit  un  pouvoir  dud*  pre- 
nouvau de  retirer  sa  fille  de  ches  Jos^  Cecire  Si  elle  Etoit  maltret^ 
male  a  propos.  Et  a  produit  pierre  Charpantier  pour  temoigner 
Les  mauvais  traitement  faitte  a  la  d*®  petitte  fille  par  Jos^  Cecire 
et  Sa  femme. 

Pierre  Charpantier  ayant  paru  a  pT6t6  Serment  de  dire  La 

1  Voiture  had  generally  in  the  Mississippi  valley  the  meaning  of  a  large  flatboat;  but, 
since  it  is  also  the  common  word  for  boat,  I  have  not  translated  it  as  a  particular  kind.  On 
page  182  it  is  used  as  synonymous  with  pirogue,  which  is  a  large  dugout. 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1784  169 

dant  of  St.  Louis  to  have  repaired  a  boat  ^  belonging  to  M.  Du- 
Charme,  which  he  had  taken  without  permission  into  the 
Illinois  River,  or  to  pay  for  it,  if  it  was  beyond  repair;  but  that 
when  he  came  to  do  it,  he  had  not  found  the  said  boat;  and, 
since  he  has  learned  that  the  said  Lafleur  had  taken  it  to  carry 
stone,  likewise  without  permission  of  anyone,  the  said  Prevost 
prays  that  the  said  Lafleur  be  condemned  to  repair  the  said  boat 
or  pay  for  it,  if  it  is  beyond  repair,  and  to  pay  all  expenses. 

Pierre  Lafleur  answers  that  it  is  true  that  he  took  the  boat; 
but  that  it  was  with  the  permission  of  Bte.  Baron  and  because  he 
believed  that  the  boat  was  M.  L.  DuCharme's. 

Bte.  Baron  appeared  and  said  that  he  had  not  permitted  the 
said  Lafleur  to  take  it;  that  he  had  only  told  the  said  Lafleur  to 
ask  permission  from  Charles  Lefevre,  who  had  been  sent  to  him 
here.  But  since  Lafleur  persisted  in  saying  that  the  said  Baron 
had  given  him  permission,  and  the  said  Baron  persisted  in  saying, 
"No",  the  said  Lafleur  demands  of  the  said  Baron  his  oath,  and 
says  that  then  he  will  agree.' 

Bte.  Baron  appeared  and  made  oath  that  he  had  not  told  the 
said  Lafleur  to  take  the  said  boat,  since  it  belonged  to  M.  Du- 
Charme;  but  that  he  had  only  told  him  to  ask  permission  of 
Charles  Lefevre,  who  had  charge  of  it. 

The  Court  condemned  the  said  Lafleur  to  put  the  said  boat 
in  condition  for  use,  or  to  pay  for  it,  according  to  the  petition  of 
the  said  Prevost.  And  the  said  Prevost  shall  pay  the  costs  of 
justice  for  having  made  use  of  the  boat  without  permission. 

At  a  Court  of  the  6th  of  May  last,  it  was  decreed  that  Pierre 
Grandmont  should  produce  his  proofs  to  justify  his  withdrawal 
of  Prenouvau's  little  daughter  from  the  house  of  Jos.  Cesirre. 

Pierre  Grandmont  appeared  and  produced  an  authority  from 
the  said  Prenouvau  to  withdraw  his  daughter  from  Jos.  Cecirre's, 
if  she  was  undeservedly  badly  treated,  and  brought  forward 
Pierre  Charpentier  as  witness  of  the  bad  treatment  given  the  said 
little  girl  by  Jos.  Cesirre  and  his  wife. 

Pierre  Charpentier  appeared  and  made  oath  to  tell  the  truth 
in  answer  to  the  questions  put  to  him,  and  said  that  he  was  present 


I70  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

verity  Sur  Les  question  qu'on  luy  feroit,  Et  a  dit,  quil  s'est  trouv^ 
present  plusieurs  fois  aux  movais  traitement  que  recevoit  la  ditte 
petitte  fille  ches  Cecire,  meme  Dans  La  rigeur  du  frois  mal  vetu 
Et  Etre  oblige  de  Soufrir  des  cruautd  Et  sans  humanite  de  la  part 
de  Cecire  Et  Sa  femme.  Suivant  le  pouvoir  donn6  aud*  Granmon 
par  prenouvau  La  declaration  de  pierre  charpantier  La  Cour  Est 
Dopignon  que  led^  Granmon  gardera  La  petitte  fille  Et  condane 
led*  Cecire  a  payer  tous  fraix  de  Justice.  Le  deboutant  de  touttes 
ses  demandes  a  ce  sujet. 

Joseph  L' ember  poursuit  Joseph  Pelleti^  pour  une  terre  Dans 
La  prairie  du  pond  Suivant  Laccord  Entre  Les  habitant,  mais 
Comme  il  S'est  trouve  une  Grande  difficulte  pour  la  Clauture  de 
cett  ditte  terre  meme  dans  le  tems  le  plus  priere,  il  a  Ete  Convenu 
par  une  assemble  pour  la  Surete  des  dittes  Clauture  que 
Celuy  qui  n'assureroit  pas  de  faire  Sa  Clauture  Seroit  donne 
a  une  autre,  En  Consequence  m^  Girardin  accompagne  d'un 
tdmoin  demande  a  tous  Ceux  qui  avoit  des  terres  Si  il  vouloit 
Claure  ou  abandonner  leur  terre.  led*  Lember  ne  luy  ayant 
Donne  aucune  reponce  assure,  Suivant  sa  declaration  la  fait  faire 
par  un  autre  Et  qui  Jouit  de  la  terre. 

La  Cour  Est  Dopignon  que  Les  parties  prendrons  des  arbitres 
pour  terminer  Leurs  differants  Et  aux  perdant  a  payer  Les  fraix 
de  Justice. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourn^  a  Jeudy  i^^  Juillet. 

J  B  H  LaCroix 
a  une  Cour  Extraordinaire  du  9^®  Juin 

Pres^*  J.  B*^  Lacroix.  Jos^  Bissonnette 

Louis  Chatel.  B*^  Saucier 

pierre  roy  Louis  Pillet 

B*®  Dumay  Pres* 

Demendeur  M^^  Beausolieil  Deffendeur  ant  armant 
une  requette  pr^sente  par  M^  Labuxiere  au  nom  Et  Comme 
Chargd  du  pouvoir  de  M^^  pourre  Beausoleil  de  poursuivre  le 
S^  ant  armant  pour  Somme  de  deux  Mil  Cinq  Cent  quarante 
livres  tant  En  argent  q'en  Pelleterie  Et  Neuf  Cent  quatre  Livres 
de  farine  le  tout  par  Ses  Billet. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1784  171 

several  times,  when  the  little  girl  was  badly  treated  at  Cesirre's, 
that  he  had  seen  her  in  the  rigour  of  cold  badly  clothed,  and  that 
she  was  obliged  to  suffer  cruelties  and  without  pity  from  Cesirre 
and  his  wife.  In  consideration  of  the  authority  given  the  said 
Grandmont  by  Prenouvau  and  of  the  declaration  of  Pierre 
Charpantier,  the  Court  is  of  the  opinion  that  the  said  Grandmont 
shall  keep  the  little  girl,  and  condemns  the  said  Cesirre  to  pay 
all  the  costs  of  justice  and  denies  all  his  prayers  on  the  subject. 

Joseph  Lember  sues  Joseph  Pelletier  for  a  piece  of  land  in  the 
Prairie  du  Pont,  which  was  taken  up  in  accordance  with  the 
agreement  among  the  inhabitants;  but  as  there  was  found  to  be 
great  difficulty  about  the  fence  of  this  said  land  even  in  the 
longest  time  requested,  it  was  decided  by  an  assembly  that  for 
the  surety  of  the  said  fences,  if  anyone  should  not  secure  his 
land  by  building  his  fence,  it  would  be  given  to  another.  Conse- 
quently M.  Girardin,  accompanied  by  a  witness,  demanded  of 
all  those,  who  had  lands,  if  they  wished  to  build  the  fences  or 
abandon  their  land.  Since  the  said  Lember  gave  no  definite 
answer,  according  to  M.  Girardin's  affidavit  he  had  had  it  built 
by  another,  who  is  enjoying  the  land. 

The  Court  is  of  the  opinion  that  the  parties  should  take  arbitra- 
tors to  settle  their  difference,  and  condemns  the  loser  to  pay  the 
costs  of  justice. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  July  i. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

At  special  session  of  the  Court,  June  9. 

President,  J.  Bte.  LaCroix.       Jos.  Bissonnette. 

Louis  Chatel.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Pierre  Roy.  Louis  Pillet. 

Bte.  Dumay.  Present. 

Madame  Beausoleil,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Ant.  Harmand,  Defendant. 
A  petition  presented  by  M.  Labuxiere  in  the  name  of,  and 
as  commissioned  with  power  from,  Madame  Pourre  Beausoleil  to 
sue  M.  Ant.  Harmond  for  the  sum  of  two  thousand  five  hundred 
and  forty  livres  both  in  money  and  peltries  and  nine  hundred  and 
four  pounds  of  flour,  the  whole  amount  as  shown  by  his  notes. 


172  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Led*  ant.  armant  ayant  paru  a  produit  un  Compte  Centre 
La  ditte  dame  Bausoleil  de  la  somme  de  six  Cent  Soixante  Et 
neuf  livres  douze  sols  En  arg*  Et  quatre  vingt  huit  livres  En 
pelleterie,  Lesquels  Comptes  ont  Et^  affirm^  sous  serment  par 
led*  ant  armant. 

^  La  Cour  Est  Dopignon  que  led*  antoine  armant  soit  Condanner 
a  payer  ses  Billet  tant  en  arg*  qu'en  pelleterie  tel  quil  Sont  Explique 
dans  le  Cour  du  present  moy  pour  tous  Delay  ainsi  que  La  farine 
moyenant  quil  luy  Soit  deduit  six  Cent  Soixante  Et  neuf  livres 
douze  sols  En  arg*  Et  quatrevingt  huit  Livre  en  Pelleterie 
Suivant  Ses  Comptes,  ordonnons  quil  luy  Soit  Sinifie  de  prendre 
Des  arangement  avec  Lad**^  Dame  Beaussoleil  ou  Son  fonde  de 
pouvoir,  Soit  par  un  Bon  Cotion  ou  autres  assurances  quil  demen- 
derons,  Et  Condannons  Led*  armant  a  tous  fraix  Et  interest 
Et  faute  par  luy  de  Se  faire  Sous  vingt  quatre  heure  nous 
accordons  a  laditte  Dame  Beausoleil  une  Execution  Contre  Led* 
ant  armant. 
La  Cour  est  ajournd  a  Jeudy  1*®  Juillet. 

fr  saucier  Greffier  J  B  H  LaCroix. 

a  une  Cour  du  i6^®  Juin  1784  Extraordinaire. 
Prdsid*  J  B*^  Lacroix  B*®  Dumay 

B*^  Saucier  pierre  roy 

Pres* 

Demendeur  ant.  armant  Deffendeur   Joseph  Billet 

Le  Demendeur  poursuit  Le  Deffendeur  pour  une  somme  de 
Cent  Cinquante  Six  livre  En  argt  quil  Luy  doit. 

Le  deffendeur  ayant  Paru  a  declare  devoir  La  ditte  somme  aud* 
Demendeur,  mais  quil  se  voit  haur  d'Etat  de  le  Satisfaire  attendu 
quil  Luy  Est  du  auSsi  Et  dont  il  ne  pent  rein  retirer,  Et  demande 
pareillement  a  la  Cour  que  les  Personne  quil  luy  Doivent  soient 
Pareillement  Condanne  a  Le  payer. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  au  deffendeur  a  payer  Les  Cent  Cinquante 
six  livres  quil  Doit  and*  demendeur  sauf  a  luy  a  poursuivre  Les 
personne  quil  Luy  Doivent. 

a  une  meme  Cour  ant.  armant  poursuit  Les  Nomme  Bequet 
Et  Durant,  pour  un  marche  passd  Entre  Eux  le  30^®  aoust  dernier, 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1784  173 

The  said  Ant.  Harmand  appeared  and  produced  an  account 
against  the  said  Madame  Beausoleil  for  the  sum  of  six  hundred  and 
sixty-nine  livres  twelve  sols  in  money  and  eighty-eight  livres  in 
peltries,  which  accounts  were  affirmed  under  oath  by  the  said 
Ant.  Harmand. 

The  Court  is  of  the  opinion  that  the  said  Antoine  Harmand 
should  be  condemned  to  pay  his  bills  in  money  and  peltries,  as 
they  are  shown,  in  the  course  of  the  present  month  at  the  longest 
and  also  the  one  for  flour,  on  condition  that  there  be  deducted  six 
hundred  and  sixty-nine  livres  and  twelve  sols  in  money  and 
eighty-eight  livres  in  peltries  according  to  his  accounts.  We 
order  that  he  be  notified  to  make  arrangements  with  the  said 
Madame  Beausoleil  or  her  representative  either  by  giving  surety 
or  other  assurances,  which  they  shall  demand ;  and  we  condemn 
the  said  Harmand  to  pay  all  costs  and  interests ;  and  in  case  he  does 
not  do  this  within  twenty-four  hours,  we  grant  to  the  said  Madame 
Beausoleil  a  writ  of  execution  against  the  said  Ant.Harmand. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  July  i. 
Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

At  a  Court,  June  16,  1784,  special  session. 
President,  J.  Bte.  LaCroix.       Bte.  Dumay. 
Bte.  Saucier.  Pierre  Roy. 

Present. 

Ant.  Harmand,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Joseph  Billet,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  the  sum  of  one  hundred 
and  fifty-six  livres  in  money,  which  he  owes  him. 

The  defendant  appeared  and  declared  that  he  owed  the  said 
sum  to  the  said  plaintiff;  but  that  he  was  not  in  a  position  to 
satisfy  it,  because  there  is  due  to  him  money  also,  which  he  cannot 
collect;  and  he  prays  likewise  of  the  Court  that  the  persons 
owing  him  be  likewise  condemned  to  pay. 

The  Court  ordered  the  defendant  to  pay  these  one  hundred  and 
fifty-six  livres,  which  he  owes  the  said  plaintiff,  reserving  to  him 
the  right  to  sue  the  persons,  who  owe  him. 

At  the  same  Court  Aht.  Harmand  sues  the  named  Becquet  and 
Durand  on  account  of  an  agreement  passed  between  them  the 


174  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

Et  Comme  il  paroit  quil  y  a  autant  de  tor  de  part  Et  D'autre 
apr^s  avoir  murement  Examine  Leurs  dire  La  Cour  Est  Dopignon 
que  led*  armant  prendra  tout  le  Bois  quil  y  a  d'Ecaris  Suivant 
Lestimation  qui  En  Sera  fait  par  Des  ouvrie  qui  Seulement 
observeront  qu  led*  armant  a  Nouri  Les  d*  Bequet  Et  Durant 
Le  terns  quils  ont  mis  a  faire  Le  Bois,  Et  a  payer  entre  Eux  les 
fraix. 

La  Cour  Est  ajournd  au  i  Juillet  1784. 

fr  saucier.  J  B  H  LaCroix. 

a  une  Cour  du  24  aoust  1784. 
President  J  B*®  Lacroix  Louis  Chatel 

pierre  roy  Louis  Fillet 

J  B*^  Dumay  Joseph  Bissonette 

Pres* 

Demendeur  ant.  Lamarche  Deffendeur  Joseph  Cecire 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  Le  deffendeur  Disant  quayant  Cotione 
pour  ant.  armant  de  la  Somme  de  deux  mil  Et  quelque  Cent  Livres 
quil  redevoit  a  M^^  Beausoleille.  Mais  quil  ne  Lavoit  fait  que  Sur 
La  promesse  que  Joseph  Cecire  avoit  fait  de  luy  payer  une  Somme 
de  Sept  Cent  Et  quelque  Livres  quil  Doit  aud*  ant  armant 
En  Consequence  il  prie  La  Cour  dobliger  led*  Cecire  a  payer 
Laditte  Somme  afin  de  pouvoir  Satisfaire  a  Celle  dud*  ant 
armant. 

Le  demendeur  [sic]  repond  quil  Est  vray  quil  doit  cette  Somme 
a  ant.  armant  Mais  quil  Etoit  Convenue  avec  luy  de  le  payer  En 
ouvrage,  Et  que  Si  y  nut  Consenti  a  cela  quil  ne  Ce  Seroit  pas 
is  fort  En  Dette. 

vue  Les  deffence  du  deffendeur  Envers  le  dit  ant  armant, 
absens,  La  Cour  a  ordonne  aud*  Jos^  Cecire  de  payer  au  de- 
mendeur trois  Cent  Livres  En  argent,  pour  Le  present  En  attand- 
ant  le  retour  dant.  armant  pour  terminer  Les  Convention  quils 
ont  fait  Ensemble. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  au  2^®  de  7^'"®. 

fr.  saucier  Grefi&er  J  B  H  LaCroix. 

Ecarir,  French-Canadian  word,  meaning  to  cut  posts  square. 


COURT  RECORD,  AUGUST,  1784  175 

30th  of  August  last;  and  since,  after  carefully  examining  their 
testimony,  it  appears  that  there  was  as  much  wrong  on  one  side 
as  the  other,  the  Court  is  of  the  opinion  that  the  said  Harmand 
shall  take  all  the  wood  which  has  been  cut  square  ^  at  the  price 
of  the  appraisment,  which  shall  be  made  by  workmen,  who  are  to 
notice  only  that  the  said  Harmand  boarded  the  said  Becquet  and 
Durand  during  the  time  they  have  taken  in  cutting  the  wood, 
and  that  the  parties  shall  pay  the  costs  between  them. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  July  i,  1784. 
Fr.  Saucier.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

At  a  Court,  August  24,  1784. 
President,  J.  Bte.  LaCroix.       Louis  Chatel. 
Pierre  Roy.  Louis  Pillet. 

J.  Bte.  Dumay.  Joseph  Bissonnette. 

Present. 

Ant.  Lamarche,  Plaintiff,  vs  Joseph  Cesirre,  Defendant. 

The  plaiijtiff  sues  the  defendant  saying  that  the  former  acted 
as  bondsman  for  Ant.  Harmand  for  the  sum  of  two  thousand 
and  some  hundred  livres,  which  he  owed  Madame  Beausoleil; 
but  that  he  had  done  it  only  on  the  promise,  which  Joseph 
Cesirre  had  made  to  pay  him  a  sum  of  seven  hundred  and 
some  livres,  which  Cesirre  owes  to  the  said  Ant.  Harmand. 
Therefore  he  begs  the  Court  to  compel  the  said  Cesirre  to  pay 
the  said  sum,  so  that  he  can  satisfy  the  debt  of  the  said  Ant. 
Harmond 

The  plaintiff  [defendant  ?]  answers  that  it  is  true  that  he  owes 
that  sum  to  Ant.  Harmand;  but  that  he  had  agreed  with  the 
latter  to  pay  him  in  work,  and  that  if  he  had  not  agreed  to  that, 
the  defendant  would  not  be  so  greatly  in  his  debt. 

Considering  the  defence  of  the  defendant  against  the  said 
Ant.  Harmand,  who  is  absent,  the  Court  ordered  Jos.  Cesirre  to 
pay  the  plaintiff  three  hundred  livres  in  money  for  the  present, 
while  waiting  for  the  return  of  Ant.  Harmand  to  terminate  the 
agreement,  which  they  have  made  together. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  September  2. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 


176  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  2^®  7^^®  1784. 
Pr^sid*  J  B*®  Lacroix  Louis  Pillet 

J  B*®  Dumay  Pierre  roy 

Present 
Demendeur  M^  Motard  Defifendeur  Jos^  vaudry 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  le  deffendeur  pour  une  Somme  de 
Cent  quatrevingt  huit  Piastre  Gourdes  Et  quatre  Escalin  suivant 
Son  Billet  Echu  du  mois  de  x^^^  passe,  Et  demende  un  hypoteque 
sur  ses  Biens  En  donnant  deux  mois  pour  Le  payment,  au  deffaut 
de  quoy  quil  luy  Soit  accorde  de  faire  vendre  Lesd^  Biens  113^30- 
teque. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  nayant  pas  pu  decendre  En  ville  il 
na  pas  pu  payer  Son  Billet,  Mais  quil  offre  a  M^  motar  I'hypoteque 
sur  sa  maison  deux  arpent  de  terre  a  la  prairie  du  pond  Et  une 
Grange  avec  Son  terrin  sur  le  Cotau  des  renards,  Et  que  m'"  motar 
pour  faire  vendre  si  il  ne  le  paye  pas  dicy  au  terme  quil  luy 
Donne. 

La  Cour  Est  Dopignon  que  M^  motar  accepte  L'offre  que  luy 
fait  vaudry  Et  quil  Luy  fasse  vendre  les  d*   Effest  quil  offre  Luy 
meme  En  hypoteque  faute  de  payement. 
La  Cour  Est  ajourn^  au  7^^  8^^^. 
fr.  saucier  G  J  B  H  LaCroix. 

a  une  Cour  du  25  S^^^ 
President,  J  B*®  Lacroix  Louis  pillet 

Pierre  roy  Jos^  Bissonette 

Louis  chatel  J.  B*^  Saucier 

prt 

a  une  meme  Cour  Pierre  troge  a  prete  le  Serment  de  fidelity 
ainsi  de  Celuy  doffice  dhuissie  de  La  Cour. 

MoNS^  Levy  Demendeur  Joseph  Belcour  Deffendeur 

Le  demendeur  Poursuit  le  deffendeur  pour  une  Somme  de  deux 
Mille  deux  Cent  livres  En  argent  quil  Luy  doit  par  son  Billet. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  depuis  quelque  Jour  il  avoit  tue 

1  Escalin,  Netherland  coin,  equivalent  to  the  English  shilling. 
^Arpent.  about  equal  to  an  acre. 


COURT  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1784  177 

At  a  Court,  September  2,  1784. 
President,  J.  Bte.  LaCroix.      Louis  Pillet. 
J.  Bte.  Dumay.  Pierre  Roy. 

Present. 
M.  MoTARD,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jos.  Vaudry,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  the  sum  one  hundred  and 
eighty-eight  piastres  gourdes  and  four  escalin^  according  to  his  note 
of  the  month  of  December  last,  which  has  fallen  due,  and  demands 
a  mortgage  on  the  defendant's  goods,  if  he  gives  him  two  months 
for  the  payment ;  in  default  of  which  payment  he  prays  that  there  be 
granted  him  permission  to  have  the  said  mortgaged  goods  sold. 

The  defendant  answers  that  because  he  could  not  come  down 
into  the  village,  he  has  been  unable  to  pay  his  bill;  but  he  offers 
M.  Motard  the  mortgage  on  his  house,  two  arpents^  of  land  in  the 
Prairie  du  Pont  and  a  bam  with  its  yard  on  Fox  Hill ;  and  that  M. 
Motard  may  have  them  sold,  if  he  does  not  pay  within  the  time 
he  gives  him. 

The  Court  is  of  the  opinion  that  M.  Motard  should  accept 
the  offer  which  Vaudry  makes  him  and  that  he  may  make  the 
latter  sell  the  said  property,  which  he  offers  him  in  mortgage, 
in  default  of  payment. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  October  7. 
Fr.  Saucier,  C.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

At  a  Court,  October  25. 
President  J.  Bte.  LaCroix.       Louis  Pillet. 
Pierre  Roy.  Jos.  Bissonnette. 

Louis  Chatel.  J.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Present. 
M.  Levy,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Joseph  Belcour,  Defendant. 
At  the  same  Court  Pierre  Troge  took  the  oath  of  fidelity  and 
also  that  of  office  of  huissier^  of  the  Court. 

The  Plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  for  the  sum  of  two  thousand 
two  hundred  livres  in  money  which  he  owes  him  on  his  note. 

3  Since  the  Record  uses  different  words  for  the  name  of  the  officer  who  executes  the 
decrees  and  serves  the  writs  of  the  court,  etc.,  it  has  seemed  best  to  retain  the  French  name, 
huissier,  when  it  occurs.  There  are  times  in  the  history  of  Illinois  when  the  opposition  to  the 
Americans  expresses  itself  in  an  emphasis  on  French  law  and  institutions.  Kas.  Rec,  Letters. 
The  duties  of  the  huissier  were  not  different  from  those  of  the  sheriff. 


178  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

quelque  animaux  desquel  il  na  Encore  pas  Et^  pay^  Se  qui 
La  mis  Jusqua  present  or  d'etat  de  satisfaire  a  Son  Billet.  Et 
demande  un  delay  de  quinze  Jour  pour  donner  un  accompte  de 
Mil  Livres. 

La  Cour  a  acorde  au  deffendeur  quinze  Jour  pour  remettre  au 
demendeur  Mil  Livres  En  argent,  tel  quil  le  demende  se  qui  a  Etd 
accepte  par  led^  demendeur,  promettant  donner  Credit  pour  le 
reste,  Mais  au  deffaut  de  payement.  Sous  Ls  dits  quinze  Jours, 
le  Demendeur  Est  autoriz€  a  faire  vendre  des  Biens  dud*  deffen- 
deur Jusqua  Sa  Somme. 

M^  Sarpy  Contre  Ch^^  Lacroix 

a  une  meme  Cour  Monsieur  Sarpy  produit  un  Compte  a  Luy 
transporte  par  M^^  veuve  Lepage  Contre  Charle  Lacroix  de 
la  Somme  de  dix  neuf  Cent  quartoze  livre  Sept  Sols,  Sauf 
a  deduire  Les  accompte  quil  pouroit  avoir  Donn^  depuis  le 
22  de  Ce  mois  datte  dud*  Compte  Et  demande  que  Led*  Lacroix 
Soit  Condanne  Sans  delay  a  Luy  remettre  La  Ballance  dud* 
Compte. 

Led*  Lacroix  ayant  Ete  assigne  de  paroitre  Cejourd'huy  Ce  a 
quoy  il  a  manque.  Et  apres  trois  apel  par  Lussier.  Ne  Setant 
trouve  ny  Sa  Personne  ny  auqu'un  represantant  pour  Luy  La 
Cour  La  Condanner  a  payer  son  Compte  sans  delay  Et  a  Paye 
tous  fraix  de  Justice. 

a  une  meme  Cour  Mons'"  Charle  Sanguinette  presente  deux 
Billet  fesant  La  Somme  de  quatre  Cent  quarante  Sept  Livne 
et  demy  de  Paux  de  Chevreuil  que  le  nome  Joseph  langlois 
Luy  doit  En  Consequence  il  Demende  a  la  Cour  de  Luy  ac- 
corder  une  Saisy  Sur  Les  Biens  dud*  Langlois,  Jusqua  Ce  quil 
aye  Prix  des  arangem*  avec  luy  pour  Lassurance  de  Ce  quil  luy 
doit. 

La  Cour  a  accorde  a  M^  Ch^^  Sanguinette  La  Saisy  quil  de- 
mende Contre  led*  Langlois  Et  ordonne  aud*  Langlois  de  prendre 
tel  arrangement  que  led*  Sieur  Sanguinette  Luy  demandera  pour 
assurer  se  quil  Luy  doit  Et  par  fautte  de  ce  faire  quil  soit  Con- 
danner a  payer  sans  delay. 

a  une  meme  Cour  m^  fr  trottier  a  produit  les  Compte  de  Balance 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1784  179 

The  defendant  answers  that  a  few  days  ago  he  had  killed 
some  animals  for  which  he  had  not  yet  been  paid,  which  put  him 
till  now  out  of  position  to  satisfy  his  note;  and  he  prays  for  a 
delay  of  of  fortnight  to  make  an  instalment  of  a  thousand  livres. 

The  Court  granted  the  defendant  a  fortnight  to  pay  the  plaint- 
iff one  thousand  livres  in  money,  as  he  prays,  and  these  terms  were 
accepted  by  the  plaintiff,  who  promises  to  give  credit  for  the  bal- 
ance. But  in  default  of  payment  within  the  said  fortnight,  the 
plaintiff  is  authorized  to  have  goods  of  the  defendant's  sold  up 
to  that  sum. 

M.  Sarpy  vs.  Charles  LaCrodc. 

At  the  same  Court  M.  Sarpy  produces  an  account  assigned  to 
him  by  Madame  Lepage,  widow,  against  Charles  LaCroix  for  the 
sum  of  nineteen  hundred  and  forty  livres  seven  sols,  saving  the 
deduction  of  the  instalments,  which  he  may  have  paid  since  the 
22nd  of  this  month,  the  date  of  this  account;  and  prays  that 
the  said  LaCroix  be  condemned  to  pay  him  the  balance  of  the  said 
account  without  delay. 

The  said  LaCroix  was  summoned  to  appear  to-day,  which  he 
failed  to  do.  And  after  three  summonses  by  the  huissier  and 
when  neither  his  person  nor  anyone  representing  him  was  found, 
the  Court  condemned  him  to  pay  his  account  without  delay  and 
to  pay  all  the  costs  oi  justice. 

At  the  same  Court  M.  Charles  Sanguinette  presents  two  notes 
amounting  to  the  sum  of  four  hundred  and  forty-seven  and  a  half 
pounds  of  deer-skins,  which  the  named  Joseph  Langlois  owes 
him;  and  consequently  he  prays  that  the  Court  grant  him  a  writ 
of  seizure  on  the  goods  of  the  said  Langlois  until  he  should 
have  made  arrangements  with  him  for  the  security  of  what  he 
owes  him. 

The  Court  granted  to  M.  Ch.  Sanguinette  the  writ  of  seizure 
which  he  prays  for  against  the  said  Langlois  and  orders  the  said 
Langlois  to  make  such  arrangements  as  the  said  M.  Sanguinette 
shall  demand  to  secure  what  he  owes  him;  and  in  default  of  doing 
so  condemns  him  to  pay  without  delay. 

At  the  same  Court  M.  Fr.  Trottier  produced  the  accounts  of 


i8o  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

de  la  tutelle  des  mineurs  Lapierre,  Suivant  La  premiere  vente  Et 
qui  a  Et^  approuve. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourn^  au  4^®  de  9^^®  Jeudy. 

fr.  saucier  J  B  H  LaCroix. 

a  une  Cour  du  4^^  9^^^  1784. 
President  J  B*®  Lacroix  Louis  pillet 

Pierre  roy  Joseph  Bissonette 

J  B^®  Dumay  Pres^ 

Demendeur  J  B*^.  Gaffe  Deffendeur  ant  armant 

Le  demendeur  poursuit  le  deffendeur  pour  une  voiture  quil  Luy 
avoit  pret^  pour  pour  [sic]  aller  dans  La  Belle  riviere,  Et  quil  soit 
oblig^  de  la  luy  remettre  En  Letat  quelle  Etoit  avec  Les  agres 
Et  Sujet  a  visite  pour  constater  Les  reparation  de  laditte  voiture 
pour  mettre  En  m^me  Etat  ou  Elle  Etoit  Lorsquil  La  Luy  a 
pret^. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  le  demendeur  Etoit  Convenu 
avec  la  luy  de  prendre  un  Canot  d'ecorce  pour  La  ditte 
voiture. 

Le  demendeur  repond  quil  Est  vray  quil  a  Dit  a  deffendeur 
quil  prendroit  un  Canot  si  il  Se  trouvoit  En  avoir  Besoin  avant 
le  retour  de  Sa  ditte  voiture  Et  a  produit  M^  Girardin  pour 
tdmoins. 

M^  Girardin  ayant  Paru  a  prete  Serment  de  dire  La  verite  Et  a 
dit  quil  Etoit  temoins  Lors  de  Larengement  de  M^*  Gaffe  Et  ant 
armant,  Et  quil  a  Entue  [sic]  que  m^  Gaffe  pretd  Sa  voiture 
aud*  armant,  sous  Les  Conditions  quil  Prendere  un  Canot 
Si  il  se  trouvoit  En  avoir  Besoin  avant  son  arrive  pour  aller  a 
Michilimaquina  Et  quensuitte  si  Le  Canot  Luy  Convenoit  il  le 
Garderoit. 

fr  Saucier  ayant  fait  Serment  de  dire  la  verity  au  quesiton  quon 
luy  feray  a  fait  Exactement  La  meme  Declaration  que  M^  ant 
Girardin. 

J  B*^  Bequet  ayant  aussi  Paru  a  pret^  Serment  de  dire  La 
verite  a  dit  quayant  Ete  un  Jour  ches  Le  S^  ant  armant  Et  quayant 
vu  Les  Canot  dud*  armant  En  Perditions  quil  demenda  au 
Nome  Gassien  pourquoy  il  ne  Les  metoit  pas  En  Lieu  de  Surety, 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1784  181 

the  balance  of  the  guardianship  of  the  minors  Lapierre  after  the 
first  sale,  and  they  were  approved. 

The  Court  adjourned  to,  Thursday,  November  4. 

Fr.  Saucier.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

At  a  Court,  November  4,  1784. 
President  J.  Bte.  LaCroix.       Louis  Pillet. 
Pierre  Roy.  Joseph  Bissonnette. 

J.  Bte.  Dumay.  Present. 

J.  Bte.  Gaffe,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Ant.  Harmand,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant ,  for  a  boat,  which  the  former 
had  loaned  him  to  go  to  the  Ohio  and  which  he  was  bound  to 
return  to  the  plaintiff  with  its  equipments  in  the  condition  that 
it  was,  and  subject  to  inspection  to  determine  the  repairs  neces- 
sary to  put  the  said  boat  in  the  same  condition  that  it  was,  when 
the  plaintiff  loaned  it  to  him. 

The  defendant  answers  that  the  plaintiff  had  agreed  with 
him  to  take  a  bark  canoe  for  the  said  boat. 

The  plaintiff  answers  that  it  is  true  that  he  said  to  the  defendant 
that  he  would  take  a  canoe,  if  he  was  in  need  of  it  before  the  return 
of  the  said  boat,  and  brought  forward  M.  Girardin  as  witness. 

M.  Girardin  appeared  and  made  oath  to  tell  the  truth  and  said 
that  he  was  a  witness  at  the  time  of  the  arrangement  between 
MM.  Gaffd  and  Harmand,  and  that  he  understood  that  M.  Gaff^ 
loaned  his  boat  to  the  said  Harmand  on  the  condition  that  he 
would  take  a  canoe,  if  he  found  himself  in  need  of  going  to 
Michillimackinac,  before  the  latter's  return,  and  that  afterwards, 
if  the  canoe  suited  him,  he  would  keep  it. 

Fr.  Saucier  made  oath  to  tell  the  truth  in  answer  to  the  question 
put  to  him,  and  made  exactly  the  same  declaration  as  M.  Ant. 
Girardin. 

J.  Bte.  Becquet  also  appeared  and  made  oath  to  tell  the  truth 
and  said  that  he  was  one  day  at  the  house  of  M.  Ant.  Harmand, 
and,  having  noticed  that  the  canoes  were  in  ruins,  asked  the 
named  Gassien  why  he  did  not  put  them  in  a  place  of  safety,  to 
which  the  latter  replied  that  he  was  expecting  M.  Gaff^  to  choose 
one  in  order  to  safe-guard  the  other. 


i82  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  quoy  se  dernier  luy  repondit  quil  attandoit  que  led*  Sieur  Gaffd 
En  aye  Choisi  un  pour  Garantir  Lautre. 

Led*  armant  produit  Pierre  Gassien  Et  apres  avoir  pretd  Ser- 
ment  de  dire  La  verite  a  dit  qayant  Envoye  Cherche  M^  Gaffe, 
quil  luy  auroit  dit  de  Choissir  un  canot  sur  Les  deux  appartenant 
a  M^  ant.  armant  sur  quoy  Led*  Sieur  Gaff^  Luy  ayant  dit  Et 
fait  voir  Celuy  quil  prenderoit,  quil  Luy  auroit  Dit  quil  Etoit  Sur 
Ces  risque  a  quoy  Led*  Sieur  Gaffe  na  rien  repondu. 

M^  ant  armant  produit  un  Sertificat  de  fr.  duchenau  qui  declare 
quil  a  Connoissance  que  M^  Gaff^  a  Et6  ches  led*  armant  avec 
Dubois  un  de  Ses  homme  Et  quils  avoit  Choisi  un  Canot  pour  la 
pirogue  sans  neanmoins  L'avoir  Deplace. 

Led*  armant  Produit  Le  Nom6  Dubois  pour  temoins  Et  apres 
avoir  pret^  Serment  de  dire  La  verity  a  dit.  quil  Est  vray  que  mon- 
sieur Gaffe  La  mene  Ches  M^  Sanfa^on  pour  choisir  un  Canot 
Et  quil  Etoit  quil  avoit  choisi  celuy  qui  Croyoit  le  meilleur  Mais 
que  m^  Gaffe  avoit  dit  quil  le  prendroit  si  il  En  avoit  Besoin,  mais 
quil  ne  sen  Est  Point  Servi. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  que  Suivant  les  accorde  de  m^^  Gaff^  Et 
armant  Et  que  led*  S^  Gaff^  ne  Setant  point  Servy  du  Canot,  tel 
quil  Ce  paroit  que  sa  voiture  luy  Soit  rendu,  En  meme  nature,  et 
led*  harmant  a  payer  Les  fraix. 

m^  Levy  Et  chartie 

a  une  meme  Cour  M^  Levy  poursuit  Michel  Chartie,  pour 
avoir  dix  Sept  planche  que  Le  nome  Charpantier  avoit  vendu  a 
M'^  Marchessaux,  Et  que  Ce  dernier  avoit  transporter  aud*  Levy, 
Led*  Chartie  ayant  revandu  ces  meme  planche,  sous  le  pretexe 
que  led*  Charpantier  Etoit  de  Societe  Et  quil  luy  devoit.  La 
Cour  a  ordonne  que  led*  Chartie  soit  condanne,  Comme  EUe  le 
condanne  a  rendre  Les  Susditte  Planche  aud*  sieur  Levy  Et  a 
payer  tons  Les  fraix  de  Justice. 

BiSSONETTE   Et   QUENEL 

a  une  meme  Cour  Jos^  Bissonette  poursuit  Pierre  quenel  pour 
un  Cochon  quil  luy  a  Et6  tu6  dans  Les  Grains  Et  qui  avoit  pass^ 
par  La  Cloture  dud*  quenel.  Led*  Cochon  ayant  Ete  Estim^  par 
Pierre  roy  Et  fr  Courri^  a  la  Somme  de  Cent  Livres,  Et  led*  Bis- 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1784  183 

The  said  Harmand  brings  forward  Pierre  Gassien,  who,  after 
having  made  oath  to  tell  the  truth,  said  that  he  had  summoned  M. 
Gaffe  and  told  him  to  choose  one  of  the  two  canoes  belonging  to 
M.  Ant.  Harmand,  upon  which  M.  Gaff^  had  pointed  out  the 
one,  which  he  would  take;  and  that  he,  the  witness,  had  said 
to  M.  Gaff^  that  it  was  at  his  risk,  to  which  M.  Gaffd  made  no 
answer. 

M.  Ant.  Harmand  brings  forward  a  certificate  of  Fr.  Duchenau, 
in  which  he  declares  that  he  knew  that  M.  Gaffd  was  at  the  said 
Harmand' s  with  Dubois,  one  of  his  men,  and  that  they  had  chosen 
a  canoe  for  the  pirogue  without,  however,  taking  it  away. 

The  said  Harmand  brings  forward  the  named  Dubois  as  a  wit- 
ness; and  after  having  made  oath  to  tell  the  truth,  the  latter  said 
that  it  is  true  that  M.  Gaffe  took  him  to  M.  Sansfajon's  to  choose 
a  canoe  and  that  he  had  chosen  the  one  which  he  believed  the 
better;  but  that  M.  Gaffe  had  said  that  he  would  take  it,  if  he  had 
need  of  it;  but  that  he  had  made  no  use  of  it. 

The  Court  decreed  that,  in  accordance  with  the  agreement 
between  MM.  Gaffe  and  Harmand  and  since  it  is  apparent  that 
M.  Gaff^  did  not  use  the  canoe,  his  boat  should  be  returned  to 
him  in  the  same  condition,  and  condemned  the  said  Harmand  to 
pay  the  costs. 

M.  Levy  and  Chartier 

At  the  same  Court  M.  Levy  sues  Michel  Chartier  for  having 
seventeen  planks  which  the  named  Charpentier  had  sold  to  M. 
Marchessaux  and  which  the  latter  had  transferred  to  the  said  Levy; 
but  the  said  Chartier  had  resold  these  same  planks  on  pretext  that 
the  said  Charpentier  was  in  partnership  with  him  and  owed  him 
money.  The  Court  decreed  that  the  said  Chartier  be  condemned, 
as  it  does  condemn  him,  to  return  the  planks  aforesaid  to  the 
said  M.  Levy,  and- to  pay  all  the  costs  of  justice. 

BiSSONNETTE  and  QUENEL 

At  the  same  Court  Jos.  Bissonnette  sues  Pierre  Quenel  for  a  pig 
which  was  killed  in  the  grain  and  which  had  passed  through  the 
said  Quenel' s  fence;  and  he  says  that  the  said  pig  was  appraised  by 
Pierre  Roy  and  Fr.  Courier  at  the  sum  of  one  hundred  livres;  and 


i84  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

sonette  demandant  quil  Luy  Soit  rendu   un  pareil  Cochon  que 
Celuy  qui  Luy  a  Ete  tu^. 

La  Cour  a  condannd  led*^  quenel  a  rendre  un  Cochon  tel  que 
Celuy  de  Bissonette  qui  sera  Estim6  siuvant  La  grosseur  de  I'autre 
par  Les  meme  Estimateur,  sauf  aud*  Bissonette  avoir  le  Choix  ou 
Des  Cent  livres  Destimation  ou  le  Cochon  Estime,  Et  Led*  quenel 
Condannd  a  Payer  Les  fraix. 

Louis  Gaut  Et  Louis  Lecomte 

a  une  meme  Cour  Louis  lecomte  poursuit  Louis  Gaut  pour 
Cinquante  Livres  En  argent  payable  En  Dare  [sic]  pour  une 
Charette  quil  Luy  a  vendu  Et  que  luy  ayant  demend^  plusieur 
fois.  Led*  Louis  Gaut  repond  quil  auroit  ofifert  une  tombere  de 
mays  moyenant  quil  la  luy  Paye  Cinquante  Livres  Comme 
EUe  vaut,  mais  que  led*  Lecompte  ne  voulant  Pas  La  pay^  plus 
de  quarante  livres  led*  Louis  Gaut  luy  a  offert  de  Largent,  Et  off  re 
de  luy  En  donner. 

La  Cour  a  condanner  Led*  Lecomte  a  prendre  son  payement 
En  argent  puis  quil  a  refuse  de  payer  La  tombere  de  mays  Ce  prix 
quelle  vaut  Et  a  payer  Les  fraix. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  au  deux  du  mois  X^^^. 

fr.  saucier  Greffier  J  B  H  LaCroix  Pres* 

a  une  Cour  du  22.  9^^^  1784.     Par  Extraordinaire 
Presidant  M^  B*^  Dumay 

Jean  B*^  LaCroix  Joseph  Bissonette  Pres* 

Pierre  Ro}^ 

Demendeur  p^^  prevost        deffandeur  antoine  armand 
deffendeur  [sic] 

Le  demandeur  poursuivant  Le  deffendeur  Conclud  par  Sa 
requete  de  ce  jour  a  ce  que  led*  s^  armand  Soit  condannd  a  payer 
Sans  delay  ou  a  luy  livrer  mille  quatrevingt  quinze  livres  de  farine 
pour  restant  de  ses  Billets  Echus  Et  Seize  cent  quarante  six  livres 
en  argent  par  son  obligation  hypotequaire  Echue  et  dont  Sentence 
de  condamnation  a  Ete  cy  devant  Rendue  contre  led*  s'*  armand. 

ouy  aussi  le  deffendeur  en  Ses  deffences  qui  a  observd  a  la 

1  The  petition  was  always  drawn  up  in  formal  language,  the  last  paragraph  of  which  was 
the  conclusion,  in  which  the  formal  demand  for  justice  was  made.  The  conclusion,  therefore, 
contained  the  exact  statement  of  the  demand  made  in  the  petition. 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1784  185 

the  said  Bissonnette  demands  that  there  be  returned  to  him  a 
similar  pig  to  the  one  that  was  killed. 

The  Court  condemned  the  said  Quenel  to  return  a  pig  like 
Bissonnette' s  and  that  it  shall  be  appraised  according  to  the 
weight  of  the  other  by  the  same  appraisers,  reserving  to  the  said 
Bissonnette  the  right  to  chose  either  the  hundred  livres  appraised 
or  the  pig;  and  the  said  Quenel  is  condemned  to  pay  the  costs. 
Louis  Gaud   and   Louis  Lecomte. 

At  the  same  Court  Louis  Lecomte  sues  Louis  Gaud  for  fifty 
livres  in  money  payable  in  commodities  for  a  cart,  which  he  sold 
the  latter,  and  which  he  had  demanded  several  times.  The  said 
Louis  Gaud  answers  that  he  had  offered  a  load  of  corn  on  condition 
that  Lecompte  should  pay  him  for  it  fifty  livres^  as  it  was  worth;  but 
that,  since  the  said  Lecomte  was  unwilling  to  pay  for  it  more 
than  forty  livres^  the  said  Louis  Gaud  offered  him  money  and 
offers  to  give  it  to  him. 

The  Court  condemned  the  said  Lecomte  to  take  his  payment 
in  money,  since  he  refused  to  pay  for  the  load  of  corn  the  price 
that  it  was  worth  and  to  pay  the  costs. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  December  2. 
Fr  Saucier,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  President. 

At  a  Court,  November  22,  1784,  special  session 
President,  Bte.  Dumay. 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.  Joseph   Bissonnette. 

Pierre  Roy.  Present. 

Pierre  Prevost,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Antoine  Harmand,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  and  concludes^by  his  petition 
of  this  day  that  the  said  M.  Harmand  should  be  condemned  to  pay 
without  delay  or  to  deliver  to  him  one  thousand  and  ninety-five 
potinds  of  flour  for  the  balance  of  his  matured  notes,  and  sixteen 
hundred  and  forty-six  livres  in  money  on  his  matured  mortgage 
obligation,  and  for  which  judgment  has  been  already  rendered 
against  the  said  Harmand. 

The  defendant  was  also  heard  in  his  defence  and  brought  to 
the  notice  of  the  Court  that  in  so  evil  times  as  the  present,  when 
the  crop  has  totally  failed,  he  was  not  in  a  position  to  pay  without 


i86  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Cour  que  dans  un  terns  si  malheureuse  comme  il  se  trouve  presen- 
tement  la  recolte  ayant  manqu^  totalement  il  Etoit  hors  detat 
de  pouvoir  payer  sans  exposer  sa  famille  dans  la  derniere  neces- 
sity, que  ses  Biens  Etoient  tous  existants  tels  quil  les  avoit  hypo- 
tequ^s  aud*  S^  Cer^  quil  suplioit  la  Cour  de  luy  accorder  un  de- 
lais  jusques  au  mois  davril,  offrant  aud*  terns  de  payer  ladite 
somme  port^e  en  son  obligation  ainsi  que  la  farine  avec  les  inter- 
est suivant  lusage. 

Le  tout  vti  et  consider^  avec  les  pieces  a  Nous  produites  par 
les  parties  Et  apres  muremcnt  examine  la  Circonstances  du 
terns.  La  Cour  a  accorde  aud^  S^  armand  deffendeur  le  delais 
jusques  dans  le  Cour  davril  de  lannee  prochaine  pour  payer  la 
somme  portee  En  Son  obligation  hypotequaire  ainsy  que  les  dix 
sept  cent  livres  de  farine  quil  livrera  aud*  tems  faute  de  quoy  la 
payera  a  raison  de  Soixante  dix  livres  le  Cent  En  argent  Et  en 
outre  les  interest  depuis  Lecheance  de  Ses  Billets,  Le  tout  Sans  dcs- 
roger  a  Ihypoteque  que  led*  S^  Cere  a  Sur  les  Biens  dud*  S^  ar- 
mand  laquelle  Nous  hotorizons  dabondant  par  ces  presentes,  Et 
En  cas  que  led*  s^  prevost  faisant  pour  led*  s^  Cere  ne  trouve  pas 
les  Biens  dud*  S^  harmand  suffisant  pour  repondre  desdites  som- 
mes  Et  farines  permis  a  luy  de  demander  Caution  aud*  S^  harmand 
p'"  sa  plus  grande  surete,  a  quoy  nous  condamnons  led*  s^  harmand. 
Et  en  outre  en  tous  les  fraix  et  depens  de  Lextraordinaire  qui 
seront  avances  sans  delais  par  led*  S^  prevost  suivant  le  Me- 
moire  qui  luy  En  sera  fourni  par  le  greffier  sauf  son  recour  pour 
son  remboursement  Contre  led*  S^  armand. 

La  Cour  est  ajourne  au  2  du  mois  de  decembre  prochain. 

J  B  H  LaCroix. 
a  une  Cour  du  8^®  Jenvier  1785. 
President  B*^  Saucier  Joseph  Bissonette 

Louis  Chatel  Pierre  roy 

Louis  Pillet  Present 

Demendeur  Nicolas  turgeon  Deffendeur  Philips  Gervais 
Le  demendeur  poursuit  le  deffendeur  Disant  quayant  Donne 
un  Capot  de  Couverte  a  Son  negre  que  Celuy  du  defifendeur 

1  The  handwriting,  language  and  orthography  of  the  record  appear  to  be  those  of  Joseph 
Labuxiere,  who  was  appointed  clerk  the  next  year,  June  20,  1785.     Probably  Saucier  was 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1785        187 

exposing  his  family  to  dire  need,  and  that  all  his  present  property 
was  already  mortgaged  to  the  said  M.  Cerr^;  and  he  begs  the 
Court  to  grant  him  a  delay  till  the  month  of  April,  at  which  time 
he  offers  to  pay  the  said  sum  carried  in  his  note  and  also  the  flour 
with  interest  according  to  usage. 

After  considering  everything  and  viewing  the  documents  pro- 
duced before  us  by  the  parties  and  after  carefully  examining  the 
circumstances  of  the  time,  the  Court  granted  M.  Harmand,  the 
defendant,  the  delay  until  during  the  course  of  April  of  next  year 
to  pay  the  sum  entered  in  his  mortgage  obligation  and  also  the 
seventeen  hundred  pounds  of  flour,  which  he  shall  deliver  at  the 
said  time,  in  default  of  which  he  shall  pay  for  it  at  the  rate  of 
seventy  livres  the  hundred  in  money  and  besides  the  interest  since 
the  maturity  of  the  notes,  the  whole  without  vitiating  the  mort- 
gage which  the  said  M.  Cerre  has  on  the  property  of  the  said  M. 
Harmand,  which  we  sufficiently  authorize  by  these  presents;  and 
in  case  that  the  said  M.  Prevost,  who  is  acting  for  the  said  M. 
Cerr^,  does  not  find  the  property  of  the  said  M.  Harmand  suffi- 
cient to  be  answerable  for  the  said  sums  and  flour,  he  is  per- 
mitted to  demand  surety  from  the  said  M.  Harmand  for  his 
greater  security,  and  we  condemn  the  said  M.  Harmand  to  this, 
and  furthermore  to  pay  all  costs  and  expenses  of  the  special 
session,  which  shall  be  advanced  without  delay  by  the  said  M. 
Prevost  according  to  the  memorandum  which  will  be  furnished 
him  by  the  clerk,  reserving  to  him  recourse  for  his  reimbursement 
against  the  said  M.  Harmand. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  2nd  of  the  month  of  December 
next.^  .  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

At  a  Court,  January  8,  1785. 

President,  Bte.  Saucier.  Joseph  Bissonnette. 

Louis  Chatel.  Pierre  Roy. 

Louis  Pillet.  Present. 

Nicolas  Turgeon,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Philippe  Gervais,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sues  the  defendant  saying  that  he  gave  his  negro 
a  blanket  coat  and  that  the  defendant's  negro  had  come  to  his 

absent  and  his  place  was  supplied  by  this  trained  notary-clerk.    For  an  account  of  him,  see 
p.  625,  note  16. 


i88  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

auroit  ete  Ches  Luy  le  Prendre  Sous  le  pretex  dit  il  que  le  negre 
dit  demendeur  luy  devoit,  Et  quayant  Etd  ches  led*  deffendeur 
pour  ravoir  led*  Capot  quil  auroit  d*  au  d*  Demendeur  quil  ne  Ce 
meloit  point  de  Ces  affaires  La. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  Son  negre  auroit  vendu  de  La  toil 
au  negre  du  demendeur  pour  du  coton  En  Echange  Et  que  ne 
L'ayant  pas  fait  Cest  qui  a  fait  que  Son  negre  ale  [sic]  prendre 
Le  Capot  pour  Jusqua  ce  quil  Soit  Paye. 

La  Cour  a  ordonn^  que  le  Capot  du  negre  dud*  Demendeur 
Soit  rendu  par  le  negre  du  deffendeur  Et  que  tant  aux  march^ 
que  les  deux  negre  ont  fait  Ensemble  que  Les  maitre  pretd  La 
main  a  ce  quil  Soit  pay^.     Et  aux  Deffendeur  a  paye  Les  fraix. 

a  une  meme  Cour  M^  ant.  Girardin  represnte  a  la  Cour  quay- 
ant deja  mesure  une  Sertaine  quantite  de  terre  a  la  fontaine  du 
pain  de  Sucre  pour  y  faire  une  habitation,  suivant  sa  requette, 
qui  ate  [sic]  appoint^. 

La  cour  Est  ajourne  a  Jeudy  3^^  fevrier. 
f.  saucier  Grefffer  B  Saucier 

a  une  Cour  du  3^^  fevrier  1785. 
President  B*®  Saucier  Pierre  roy 

B*^  Dumay  Jos^  Bissonette 

Louis  Pillet  Present 

Robert  Watts  Demendeur 
une  requette  Presente  par  m'"  Robert  Watts  Demandant  une 
Demy  lieu  de  terre  En  quare  quil  Bornera  Luy  meme  au  Premier 
ruissau  qui  Passe  Plus  Loin  que  le  Chemin  qui  monte  Les  cottes 
au  marais  Des  Bute,  Et  qui  a  Ete  appointe  suivant  sa  demande. 
La  Cour  Est  ajourne  3^^  mars. 

B  Saucier 
Bequet  et  Granmon. 
a  une  meme  Cour  B*^  Bequet  porte  plainte  Contre  Pierre 
Granmon  pour  une  Somme  de  Cent  vingt  cinq  Livres  pour  Lavoir 
traitte  Dans  sa  maladie,  Granmon  ayant  Ete  assine  a  refuse  de 

^  I  have  found  very  little  about  Robert  Watts  outside  of  what  is  contained  in  this  volume, 
for  which  see  Index.  He  came  to  Illinois  in  tlie  year  1782,  and  was  the  principal  settler  at 
Grand  Ruisseau.  He  was  appointed  commandant  of  that  post  by  the  magistrates  of  Cahokia. 
See  pp.  295,  597;  Papers  of  Old  Cong.,  xlviii.,  177. 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1785       189 

house  and  taken  it,  under  pretext,  he  said,  that  the  negro  [of  the] 
said  plaintiff  owed  it  to  him,  and  that  when  he  went  to  the  defend- 
ant's house  to  get  the  said  coat  that  the  defendant  had  told  the 
said  plaintiff  that  he  never  mixed  himself  up  in  these  affaires. 

The  defendant  answers  that  his  negro  had  sold  some  cloth 
to  the  plaintiff's  negro  in  exchange  for  some  cotton;  and  that  since 
the  latter  did  not  keep  his  agreement,  his  negro  went  and  took  the 
coat  to  hold  until  he  should  be  paid. 

The  Court  decreed  that  the  coat  of  the  plaintiff's  negro  be  re- 
turned by  the  defendant's  negro,  and  that  the  masters  take  a  hand 
and  see  that  the  bargain,  which  the  two  negros  have  made,  is 
carried  out;  and  the  Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay  the 
costs. 

At  the  same  Court  M.  Ant.  Girardin  shows  the  Court  that  he 
has  already  measured  a  certain  piece  of  land  at  the  Sugar  Loaf 
Spring  for  the  purpose  of  making  a  dwelling  there  according  to  his 
petition,  which  was  granted. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  Thursday,  February  3. 
At  a  Coiu-t,  February  3,  1785. 
President,  Bte.  Saucier.  Pierre  Roy. 

Bte.  Dumay.  Jos.  Bissonnette. 

Louis  Pillet.  Present. 

Robert  Watts,'  Applicant. 
A  petition  presented  by  M.  Robert  Watts,  in  which  he  asks  for 
a  half  league  square  of  land,  of  which  he  will  lay  out  the  limits 
himself  at  the  first  creek  crossing  the  road  which  goes  up  the  hill 
to  the  swamp  of  the  bluffs;  [?]  and  it  was  granted  according  to 
his  petition.^ 

The  Court  adjourned  to  March  3. 

B.  Saucier. 
Becquet  and  Grandmont. 
At  the  same  Court  Bte.  Becquet  brought  complaint  against 
Pierre  Grandmont  for  a  sum  of  one  hundred  and  twenty-five  livres 
for  having  treated  him  during  his  sickness.     Grandmont  was  sum- 

2  The  grant  was  at  Grand  Ruisseau.  It  was  recommended  for  confirmation  by  the  U.  S  . 
land  commissioners. — Amer.  Stale  Pap.,  Public  Lands,  ii.,  219.  For  Grand  Ruisseau,  see 
map;  Introduction,  pp.  cxxii.,  cxlviii.,  and  post  pp.  217,  219,  307. 


I90  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

paroitre,  led*  Bequet  ayant  Declare  quil  Etoit  Due  aud*  Gran- 
mon  par  M^  Labbadie,  La  Cour  Est  Dopignon  quil  sera  saisy 
Entre  Les  main  dud*  S'*  Labaddie  La  Somme  de  Cent  Cinquante 
livres  tant  Pour  La  Somme  reclame  par  B*^  Bequet  que  Pour  les 
fraix. 

fr.  saucier  Greff  B  Saucier, 

a  une  Cour  du  24  Mars  1785. 

Presidant  B*®  Saucier  Pierre  Roy 

B*e  Du  May  Louis  Pillet 

Louis  Chatel  Prese 

une  requette  present^  par  Jacob  groot  demandant  que  pour 
lever  les  contestations  qui  sont  Entre  luy  et  gemes  pigoust  pour 
les  terres  quils  ont  prises  au  grand  Ruisseau  La  Cour  leur  permete 
de  Nommer  des  arbitres  pour  tirer  la  ligne  Entreux. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  que  les  parties  Nommeront  des  arbitres 
quils  Choisiront  eux  memes  pour  tirer  la  ligne  Entre  leur  terre  qui 
font  leur  Contestation  ce  qui  sera  Execute. 

Labuxiere  gref.  B  Saucier. 

a  la  meme  cour  une  requete  En  reparation  dhoneur  pre- 
sentee par  francois  Camus  Contre  le  Nomm^  hardouin  apres  que 
les  deux  parties  ont  produit  de  part  Et  dautres  Les  Certifficats 
des  temoins  qui  se  sont  trouvez  contradictoire.  ouy  les  deux  parties 
En  leur  demandes  Et  deffences  le  tout  murement  considere  Et 
Examind  Et  apres  que  led*  hardouin  a  declare  En  presence  de 
la  Cour  quil  reconnoissoit  led*  francois  Camus  pour  honneste 
homme  que  dans  les  propos  quil  avoit  tenia  il  Navoit  pas  Entendu 
dire  que  le  S^  camus  luy  avoit  vole  une  taure  mais  quil  Croyoit 
que  cele  quil  avoit  vu  dans  sa  Cour  Etoit  la  sienne.  Nous  avons 
deboute  Le  s^  Camus  de  toute  Ses  demandes  Envers  led*  har- 

1  It  is  said  that  James  Piggott  was  bom  in  Connecticut  and  was  engaged  in  the  privateer- 
ing service  during  the  American  Revolution. — Reynolds,  My  Own  Times,  64.  He  was  commis- 
sioned captain  of  the  miHtary  associates  of  Westmoreland  Co.,  Pa.  on  April  6,  1776,  and  in 
October  of  the  same  year,  captain  of  the  8th  Pennsylvania  regiment,  and  served  under  General 
Arthur  St.  Clair  until  October  22,  1777.  His  commissions  are  in  Dr.  MSS.,  1Z36-72.  Why, 
and  when  he  came  to  Illinois  rests  on  traditions  handed  down  in  his  family,  and  may  be  found 
both  in  Reynolds  and  the  Dr.  MSS.  According  to  these  sources,  he  joined  Clark's  expedition 
to  Illinois  as  an  independent  volunteer  and  served  through  the  Kaskaskia  campaign.  He 
then  became  a  colonist  at  Fort  Jefferson,  where  he  was  in  command  during  the  siege  by  the 
Chickasaws  in  1781  (sic).  He  then  moved  to  Kaskaskia  and  in  1783  built  Piggott's  fort  at 
Grand  Ruisseau.  Unfortunately  for  this  story  of  his  prowess,  his  name  does  not  appear  in 
any  list  of  Clark's  soldiers.  —  English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  ii.,  1067.  His  command  at 
Fort  Jefferson  is  not  mentioned  in  any  of  the  letters  of  his  contemporaries,  nor  is  he  mentioned 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1785  191 

moned  and  refused  to  appear.  The  said  Becquet  declared  that 
money  was  owing  the  said  Grandmont  by  M.  Labadie.  The 
Court  is  of  the  opinion  that  seizure  shall  be  made  of  the  sum  of 
one  hundred  and  fifty  livres  in  the  hands  of  M.  Labadie  for  the 
sum  claimed  by  Bte.  Becquet  and  for  the  costs. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  B.  Saucier. 

At  a  Court,  March  24,  1785. 
President,  Bte.  Saucier.  Pierre  Roy. 

Bte.  Dumay,  Louis  Pillet. 

Louis  Chatel.  Present. 

A  petition  presented  by  Jacob  Groot,  in  which  he  prays  that, 
in  order  to  end  the  disputes  between  himself  and  James  Piggott^ 
over  the  land  they  have  takfen  up  at  Grand  Ruisseau  the  Court 
permit  them  to  name  arbitrators  to  draw  the  line  between  them. 

The  Court  decreed  that  the  parties  shall  name  arbitrators, 
whom  they  shall  choose  themselves,  to  draw  between  their  lands 
the  line  which  is  in  dispute,  for  which  there  will  be  execution. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk.  B.  Saucier. 

At  the  same  Court  a  petition  in  satisfaction  of  honour  was  pre- 
sented by  Francois  Camus  against  the  named  Hardouin.  After 
the  parties  on  both  sides  produced  the  certificates  of  witnesses, 
which  are  found  to  be  contradictory,  the  two  parties  were  heard 
in  their  prayers  and  defences  and  all  were  carefully  considered 
and  examined;  and  after  the  said  Hardouin  declared  in  the 
presence  of  the  Court  that  he  regarded  the  said  Franjois  Camus 
as  an  honest  man  and  that  in  the  conversation  he  had  held,  he 
had  not  intended  to  say  that  Fr.  Camus  had  stolen  a  heifer, 
but  that  he  believed  that  the  one  he  had  seen  in  the  yard  was 
his,  we  have  denied  all  the  demands   of  M.  Camus  against  the 

as  officer  or  soldier  by  any  one.  This  is  not  absolute  proof,  for  the  name  of  the  commanding 
officer  of  Fort  Jefferson  during  the  siege  is  not  given  anywhere,  as  far  as  I  can  find.  Captain 
George  was  in  command  in  October,  1780. — Va.State  Pap.'i.,  382.  It  is  to  be  noticed  that 
both  the  quoted  authorities  in  favor  of  Piggott  name  1781  instead  of  the  correct  year,  1780, 
as  the  date  of  the  siege.  This  is  interesting,  since  in  1787  Piggott  declared  that  he  took  up 
his  residence  in  Illinois  in  the  year  1780.  Pap.  of  Old  Cong,  xlvii .,  177.  As  later  pages  of  this 
volume  v/ill  show,  he  was  not  the  principal  resident  at  Grand  Ruisseau,  See  post  pp.  289,  599, 
605.  When  Piggott's  old  commander  came  to  Illinois  as  Governor  St.  Clair,  Piggott  became 
the  prominent  man,  he  had  longed  to  be  during  the  rule  of  the  French  court,  and  was  appointed 
to  the  position  of  justice  of  the  court  of  St.  Clair  County.  —  Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,  165. 
In  1797  he  established  a  ferry  from  Cahokia  to  St.  Louis.  His  daughter  described  him  as  a 
little  short  of  six  feet  with  black  hair,  blue  eyes  and  fair  complexion. 


192  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

douin  a  deffaud  par  luy  de  Setre  mis  En  regie  dans  les  formes 
pour  Ses  certifficats  de  temoin  Et  condamnons  Le  Nomme  har- 
douin  En  Cent  Cinq  livres  du  frais  occasionne  par  led^  hardouin 
p^  les  requetes  ordres  Et  autres  frais  de  justice  Raport  a  quelques 
propos  inconsideres  Et  sans  malice  quil  peut  avoir  tenu;  La  dit 
jour  vingt  quatre  mars  1785. 

La  Cour  ajournee  au  Sept  davril  prochain  davril  [sic]. 

Labuxiere  greffier  B.  Saucier, 

a  une  Cour  du  Six  juin  1785. 
President  B*^  Saucier  Louis  Fillet 

Louis  Chatel  Joseph  Bissonet 

Pierre  Roy 

une  requette  presentee  par  le  S^  gabriel  Cere  En  datte  du  4. 
de  ce  mois  demandant  Et  expositive  quil  a  fait  saisir  Les  Biens 
du  S'"  antoine  harmand  Armand  [sic]  Sans  facon  En  yertu  dune  sen- 
tence de  la  Cour  du  22  9^^^  dernier  Rendue  contre  led*  S^  har- 
mand Et  Encore  En  vertu  de  Son  obligation  cautionee  par  Jean 
B*^  duMay  passe  a  la  Suite  de  la  dite  sentence  pour  le  payement 
de  deux  mil  six  cent  vingt  Six  livres  six  sols  huit  deniers  En  argent 
que  led*  sans  facon  ou  led*  dumay  devoit  payer  au  terme  du  mois 
davril  dernier  que  faute  de  payement  led*  s^  Cerre  a  fait  Saisir 
les  Biens  dud*  sans  facon  pour  etre  vendus  judiciairement  au  plus 
ofrant  Et  dernier  Encherisseur  sous  la  huitaine  quil  suplioit  la 
Cour  daccorder  ladite  vente.  vu  aussi  la  Saisie  faite  des  Biens 
dud*  sans  facon  par  Ihuissier  de  cette  justice  le  31.  may  dernier. 
Ensemble  la  requete  presentee  ce  dit  jour  par  le  s^  antoine  har- 
mand Expositive  quil  reclame  lautorite  de  la  Cour  contre  lin- 
justice  qui  luy  a  Ete  faite  pour  un  negre  quil  a  acquis  de  Lencan 
des  mineurs  nicole  que  led*  negre  Etoit  Empoisoneur  avant  quil 
En  acquis  de  cette  sucession  ayant  Ete  convaincu  davoir  Em- 
poisonne  son  maitre  Et  sa  maitresse  Et  quil  sest  Evade  des  mains 
de  la  justice,  que  led*  harmand  a  Ete  condamne  injustement  a 
^.e  payer  et  que  cest  pour  cette  somme  quil  se  trouve  aujourdhuy 

1  Expositive,  not  a  term  of  French  law,  but  it  is  used  in  both  English  and  Spanish  law. 
Its  use  in  the  record  from  now  on  is  probably  due  to  the  presence  in  Cahokia  of  Joseph  La- 
buxiere, v/ho  had  served  as  notary  under  the  Spanish  in  St.  Louis  for  several  years. 

2  Denier,  the  twelth  part  of  the  sol. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1785  193 

said  Hardouin  because  of  his  failure  to  conform  strictly  to  the  legal 
forms  for  his  certificates  of  testimony;  and  we  condemn  the  named 
Hardouin  to  pay  one  hundred  and  five  livres  expense  occasioned 
by  the  said  Hardouin  for  petitions,  orders  and  other  expenses  of 
justice  connected  with  some  words,  ill-considered  and  without 
malice,  which  he  may  have  said.  The  said  day,  March  24,  1785. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  the  7th  of  April  next. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk.  B.  Saucier. 

At  a  Court,  June  6,  1785. 

President  Bte.  Saucier.  Louis  Pillet. 

Louis  Chatel.  Joseph  Bissonnette. 

Pierre  Roy.  Present. 

A  petition  presented  by  M.  Gabriel  Cerr^,  dated  the  4th  of 
this  month,  petitionary  and  explanatory  \  in  which  he  says  that 
he  has  made  seizure  of  the  goods  of  the  said  Antoine  Harmand 
called  Sansfagon  by  virtue  of  a  decree  of  the  Court  rendered 
the  22nd  of  November  last  against  the  said  M.  Harmand, 
and  also  by  virtue  of  his  note,  indorsed  by  Jean  Bte.  Dumay,  and 
made  after  the  said  decree,  for  the  payment  of  two  thousand 
six  hundred  and  twenty-six  livres  six  sols  eight  deniers  ^  in  money, 
which  the  said  Sansfa^on  or  the  said  Dumay  ought  to  have  paid  in 
the  month  of  April  last;  and  that  in  default  of  payment  the  said 
M.  Cerre  has  made  seizure  of  the  goods  of  the  said  Sansfayon 
that  they  may  be  sold  by  the  authority  of  justice  to  the  highest 
bidder  within  the  week;  and  he  begs  the  Court  to  grant  the 
said  sale.  In  view  of  the  seizure  of  the  goods  of  the  said 
Sansfagon  made  by  the  huissier  of  this  Court,  the  31st  of  May 
last,  and  also  in  view  of  the  explanatory  petition  presented  this 
said  day  by  M.  Antoine  Harmand,  in  which  he  claims  the 
authority  of  the  Court  against  the  injustice  which  has  been  done 
him  in  regard  to  a  negro,  whom  he  bought  at  the  auction  of  the 
minors  NicoUe,  and  who  was  a  poisoner  before  he  acquired 
him  from  that  estate,  for  the  said  negro  had  been  convicted  of 
having  poisoned  his  master  and  mistress  and  escaped  from 
the  hands  of  justice;  and  in  which  the  said  Harmand  affirms  that 
he  was  condemned  unjustly  to  pay  for  him,  and   that  it  is  for 


194  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

poursuivy  par  le  S'*  Cer^  comme  tuteur  des  mineurs  nicole 
demandant  une  revision  de  douze  jurds  pris  sur  cette  Rive  pour 
Reviser  lafaire  selon  les  loix  Et  la  justice.  Le  tout  vti  Et 
Consider^  Nous  avons  accorde  au  S^  harmand  Sans  facon 
une  revision  de  douze  jures  pris  sur  cette  Rive  Et  non  ailleurs 
pour  deliberer  Et  reviser  ladite  affaire  lesquels  sassembleront 
jeudy  prochain  suivant  la  Nomination  qui  En  sera  faite  par  la 
Cour  Et  cependant  le  s^  du  May  Restera  Caution  jusqua  la  par- 
faite  deffinition  des  jures  Et  la  Saisie  subsistera  jusqua  leur  sen- 
tence definitive  Le  tout  a  la  Conservation  des  droits  de  qui  il 
apartiendra  Si  mandons   &c.  cesd*  jour  Et  an. 

La  Cour  est  aujournee  pour  le  sept  de  juillet  prochain. 

B  Saucier 

Note  Des  Jurds  que  La  Cour  a  Nom^  led^  Jour  pour  La 
definition  de  la  Santance  cy  dessus,  qui  Sassanbleront  Jeudy 
Prochain  9  Du  Aoust  En  La  Chambre  Daudience  pour  rendre 
Santance  definitif  sans  Pourvoir  quitter  leur  Stance  Savoir,  M^^ 
ant.  Girardin,  Philip  Angel,  Paul  Hubert  Lacroix,  J  B*^  Bergeron, 
henry  Biron,  J.  B^^  Gaffe,  B^^  Morel,  Ch^^  Ducharme,  Fr  Couri^, 
Js^  Labuxiere  Pere,  ant  Boye,  J.  B^^  Dubuque,  arrettd  ced*  Jour 
a  la  Suitte  de  la  Cour. 

fr.  saucier  Greff  B  Saucier. 

a  une  Cour  Extraordinaire  du  9^^  Juin  1785. 
President  B^^  Saucier  Louis  Pillet 

Pierre  roy  Jos^  Bissonet 

Louis  chatel  B*«  Dumay 

Demendeur  Gabriel  Cerre  Deffendeur  ant.  harmant 
La  Cour  Etant  assamble  Pour  Prendre  Le  Serment  des  Douze 
Jures  cy  devant  Denome  Et  sont  a  Linstant  Comparu  Les  Sieurs 
ant.  Girardin  Philipe  Engel  Paul  Hubert  lacroix  J  B*^  Bergeron 
henry  Biron  J  B*^  Gaffe  J  B*^  morel  ch^^  Ducharme,  fr  Courrie 
Jos^  Labuxiere  ant  Boye  Et  J  B^^  Dubuque,  Lesquels  ont  Prete 
Serment  sur  les  S^  Evangille,  de  Bien  sacquitter  En  leur  charge  de 
Jure  suivant  les  Pieces  qui  leurs  Seront  Present^,  Dans  Laffaire 
Entre   M^^  Cerr^  Et  Sanfafon  Jusqua  leurs  Santance  difinitif. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1785  195 

this  sum  that  he  is  to-day  sued  by  the  said  M.  Cerr?,  acting 
as  guardian  of  the  minors  NicoUe;  and  in  which  he  prays 
for  a  revision  of  the  case  according  to  law  and  justice  by  twelve 
jurors  drawn  from  this  bank:  in  view  and  in  consideration  of  all 
this  we  granted  to  M.  Harmand  called  Sansfafon,  a  revision 
of  the  said  case  by  a  twelve  jurors  drawn  from  this  bank  and  not 
elsewhere,  and  they  shall  assemble  Thursday  next  according  to 
their  appointment  by  the  Court;  and  moreover  M.  Dumay  shall 
remain  bondsman  until  the  final  decision  of  the  jurors  and  the 
seizure  shall  continue  until  their  definitive  verdict,  all  for  the 
preservation  of  rights  of  whomsoever  it  shall  concern;  so  we 
command,  etc.  this  said  day  and  year. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  7th  of  July  next. 

B.  Saucier. 
Panel  of  jurors  whom  the  Court  named  this  said  day  for  their 
decision  on  the  above  judgment  and  who  shall  assemble  Thurs- 
day next,  the  9th  of  August,  in  the  audience  chamber  to  render 
definitive  verdict  before  adjourning  to  wit:  MM.  Ant.  Girardin, 
Philippe  Engel,  Paul  Hubert  Lacroix,  J.  Bte.  Bergeron,  Henry 
Biron,  J.  Bte.  Gaffe,  Bte.  Morel,  Charles  DuCharme,  Fr.  Courier, 
Joseph  Labuxiere,  Sr.,  Ant.  Boyer,  J.  Bte.  Dubuque;  resolved 
this  said  day  at  the  close  of  Court. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  B.  Saucier. 

At  a  special  session  of  the  Court,  June  9,  1785. 

President,  Bte.  Saucier.  Louis  Pillet. 

Pierre  Roy.  Joseph  Bissonnette. 

Louis  Chatel.  Bte.  Dumay. 

Present. 
Gabriel  Cerre,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Ant.  Harmand,  Defendant. 
The  Court  assembled  to  receive  the  oath  from  the  twelve 
jurors  here  above  named  and  there  immediately  appeared  MM. 
Ant.  Girardin,  Philippe  Engel,  Paul  Hubert  LaCroix,  J.  Bte.  Ber- 
geron, Henry  Biron,  J.  Bte.  Gaff^,  J.  Bte.  Morel,  Charles  Du- 
Charme, Fr.  Courier,  Jos.  Labuxiere,  Ant.  Boyer  and  J.  Bte. 
Dubuque,  who  made  oath  on  the  Holy  Gospels  to  acquit  them- 
selves well  of  their  duty  of  jury  in  accordance  with  the  documents, 


196  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

La  Santance  difinitif  ayant  Et^  Present^  a  la  Cour  a  Et^  omo- 
loque  Et  approuv^  par  la  ditte  Cour  Ced*  Jour  Et  an. 

B  Saucier 


a  une  Cour  du  20  de  Juin  1785. 
Les  Sieurs  antoine  Girardin  J  B*^  Lacroix  Ch^®  duCharme 
Philipe  Engel  Jean  B*^  Dubuque  Francois  Courier  et  Thomas 
Brady,  ayant  Et^  nome  par  la  nouvelle  Ellection,  sont  Comparu, 
Et  apres  avoir  Prete  Serment  de  fidelite  ainsi  que  Celuy  doffice 
Et  ont  Pris  Leurs  Place  En  leurs  qualite  de  Magistra. 

a  une  meme  Cour  Joseph  Labuxiere  a  prete  Serment  de  Fide- 
lite  ainsi  que  celui  doffice  En  Sa  quality  de  greffier  de  la  Cour  de  ce 
district. 

a  une  meme  Cour  pierre  troge  a  prete  Serment  doffice  Et  de 
fidelite  dans  sa  Charge  dhuissier  de  cette  dite  Cour. 

N°  1^' 
a  la  meme  cour  accorde  a  pierre  martin  quartre  cent  quarante 
arpens  de  terre  a  lendroit  apelle  la  petite  prairie  a  titre  de  Con- 
cession. 

N-^  2 
a    la    meme    cour    accord^    a    thomas    Bredy    quatre    cent 
quarante  arpens  de  terre  a  lendroit  apelld  la  petite  prairie  sur 
les  Cotes  a  titre  de  Concession  suivant  sa  requete  de  ce  jour  a 
luy  remise. 

a  une  meme  Cour. 
President  Jean  B^^  LaCroix      Philipe  Engle 
ant  Girardin  thom.  Bredy 

Charl.  ducharme  francois  Courier 

demandeur  Jean  B*^  Morel  deffendeur  Jean  B*^  Gaffe 
Le  demandeur  repete  par  son  compte  courant  contre  le  deffend- 
eur la  Somme   des  quatre  vingt  dix  neuf  livres  huit   sols   En 
argent,     le  deffendeur  aleguant  que  dans  ce  voyage  led^  morel 
Etoit  oblige  de  parole  verbales  a  luy  fournir  la  voiture  Et  les 

1  Among  the  Cahokia  records  in  the  library  of  the  Chicago  Historical  Society  are  the 
following  documents  belonging  to  this  case: — The  petition  of  Cerr^  of  November  22,  1784, 
the  petition  by  the  same  of  June  i,  1785,  of  which  the  record  of  the  session  of  June  6,  1785, 
contains  the  substance,  and  the  verdict  of  the  jury.    The  jury,  which  was  composed  of  the 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1785  197 

which  shall  be  presented  them  in  the  case  between  MM.  Cerr^ 
and  Sansfafon,  until  they  shall  have  reached  a  definitive  verdict. 
The  definitive  verdict  was  returned  to  the  Court  and  con- 
firmed and  approved  by  the  said  Court  this  said  day  and  year.^ 

B.  Saucier. 
At  a  Court,  June  20,  1785. 
MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  J.  Bte.  Lacroix,  Ch.  DuCharme,  Phi- 
lippe Engel,  Jean  Bte.  Dubuque,  Francois  Courier  and  Thomas 
Brady,  having  been  elected  at  the  new  election,  appeared  and, 
after  havirfg  taken  oath  of  fidelity  and  also  that  of  office,  took  their 
place  as  magistrates. 

At  the  same  Court  Joseph  Labuxiere  took  oath  of  fidelity  and 
also  that  of  office  as  clerk  of  the  Court  of  this  district. 

At  the  same  Court  Pierre  Troge  took  oath  of  office  and  of 
fidelity  for  his  commission  of  huissier  of  this  Court. 

No.  I. 
At  the  same  Court  there  was  granted  Pierre  Martin  four  hun- 
dred arpents  of  land  in  the  place   called  the  Little  Prairie  by 
right  of  concession. 

No.  2. 
At  the  same  Court  there  was   granted   Thomas  Brady   four 
hundred  arpents  of  land  in  the  place  called  the  Little  Prairie 
on  the  bluffs  by  right  of  concession  in  accordance  with  his  peti- 
tion returned  this  day  to  him. 

At  the  same  Court. 
President,  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.     Philippe  Engel. 
Ant.  Girardin.  Thom.  Brady. 

Charles  DuCharme.  Francois  Courier. 

Jean.  Bte.  Morel,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jean  Bte.  Gaffe,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  brings  a  claim  against  the  defendant  for  the  sum 
of  ninety-nine  livres  eight  sols  in  cash  according  to  his  current 
account.  The  defendant  pleads  that  the  said  Morel  was 
bound  by  verbal  agreement  to  furnish  him  the  boat,  the 
necessary  men  and  supplies  for  the  said  journey  and  that  he 

most  influential  men  of  the  village,  decided  that,  since  Pomp^,  the  negro,  was  purchased  by 
Harmand  after  the  charge  of  poisoning  the  Nicolles  was  made  against  him,  the  purchase  should 
be  annulled  and  Harmand  released  from  his  note  as  well  as  from  interest  and  costs. 


198  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

hommes  necessaires  Et  vivres  pour  le  susdit  voyage  quil  na  pas 
Effectud  Sa  promesse  ouy  les  repliques,  demandes  Et  deffences 
le  tout  Examine  nous  avons  Renvoye  les  parties  hor  de  Cour  et  de 
procds  a  ce  sujet  Sans  pouvoir  Rien  se  repeter  lun  Enver  lautre 
depens  compensez  Entreux. 

a  la  meme  cour 

demandeur  Francois  Coyolle  deffendeur  Pierre  troge 

Le  demandeur  concluant  a  ce  que  le  defendeur  soit  condamnd 
a  luy  payer  un  billet  de  Neuf  cent  vingt  Sept  livres  quinze  sols 
quil  a  produit. 

Le  defendeur  a  repondii  quil  avoit  fait  des  ouvrages  a  deman- 
deur a  compte  dud^  Billet  et  quil  ofroit  de  finir  led^  ouvrage  que 
cependant  il  Convenoit  apres  louvrage  fait  detre  Encore  redeva- 
ble  aud^  demandeur.  le  tout  examine  nous  avons  condamnd 
le  d^  troge  a  payer  presentement  la  somme  de  Cent  livres  aud^ 
sr.  Coyole  la  somme  de  Cent  livres  [sic],  En  outre  quils  Regleront 
leurs  comptes  sous  huit  jours  Et  led*  troge  a  faire  louvrage 
quil  est  Convenu,  Sous  trois  mois  de  ce  jour  Et  apres  led* 
ouvrage  fini  Et  leur  compte  arrete  le  Condamnons  a  payer  la 
solde  de  son  compte  aud*  s^  Coyole  sans  aucuns  delais  Et  aux 
depens. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 

Clement  alary  demandeur  Etienne  ardouin  defendeur 

Le  demandeur  exposant  que  led*  ardouin  a  abandonne  une 
pouliche  au  petit  Laramee  quil  Croyoit  morte  Et  sur  les  risques 
dud*  laramee  pour  une  petite  truye.  le  deffendeur  aleguant  quil 
Croyoit  avoir  fait  un  badinage  vu  le  Certificat  de  michel  girar- 
din  qui  declare  que  le  change  a  Ete  fait  de  Bonne  foy  Et 
sans  Badinage  Nous  adjugeons  la  pouliche  aud*  Clement 
alary  ou  laramee.  lequel  livrera  la  petite  truye  aud*  ardouin 
Et  par  des  domagement  Condamnons  led*  Clement  alary  aux 
depens. 

a  la  meme  cour  le  S^  francois  saucier  a  Rendil  compte  a 
leon  Lepage  de  la  sucession  de  Ses  pere  Et  mere  comme 
Charge  du  recouvrement  dont  le  dit  Leon  lepage  luy  a  donn6 
quitance. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1785  199 

has  not  kept  his  promise.  When  these  replies,  prayers  and 
defences  were  heard  and  all  examined,  we  dismissed  the  parties 
and  the  suit  on  the  subject  without  allowing  either  party  to 
bring  suit  against  the  other;  the  costs  are  to  be  shared  between 
them. 

At  the  same  Court. 
Francois  Caillot,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Troge,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  concludes  that  the  defendant  should  be  con- 
demned to  pay  him  a  note,  which  he  produced,  for  nine  hundred 
and  twenty-seven  livres  fifteen  sols. 

The  defendant  answered  that  he  had  done  some  work  for  the 
plaintiff  on  account  of  the  said  note  and  offered  to  finish  the 
said  work,  and  moreover  agreed  that  after  the  work  was  finished 
that  he  would  be  still  in  debt  to  the  plaintiff.  After  all  was 
examined,  we  condemned  the  said  Troge  to  pay  now  the  sum  of 
one  hundred  livres  to  the  said  M.  Caillot;  and  furthermore 
decided  that  they  shall  settle  their  accounts  within  eight  days, 
and  the  said  Troge  is  to  finish  the  work  for  which  he  has  con- 
tracted within  three  months  from  this  day, 'and  after  the  said 
work  is  finished  and  their  account  closed,  we  condemn  him  to 
pay  the  balance  of  his  account  to  the  said  Caillot  without  delay, 
and  to  pay  the  costs. 

At  the  same  Court. 
Clement  Alarie,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Etienne  Hardouin,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  shows  that  the  said  Hardouin  abandoned  a  filly 
which  he  believed  dead  to  the  little  Laramie  and  at  the  risk  of 
the  little  Laramde  in  exchange  for  a  little  sow.  The  defendant 
pleads  that  he  believed  that  it  was  a  joke.  Considernig  the  cer- 
tificate of  Michel  Girardin  who  declares  that  the  exchange  was 
made  in  good  faith  and  not  as  a  joke,  we  adjudge  the  filly  to  the  said 
Clement  iVlarie  or  Laramde,  who  shall  deliver  the  little  sow  to 
the  said  Hardouin;  and  for  damages  we  condemn  the  said 
Clement  Alarie  to  pay  the  costs. 

At  the  same  Court  M.  Francois  Saucier  rendered  account  to 
Leon  Lepage  of  the  estate  of  his  father  and  mother,  as  entrusted 
to  make  recovery,  for  which  Leon  Lepage  gave  him  receipt. 


200  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  la  meme  cour  les  magistrats  voulant  Etablir  une  taxe  fixe  pour 
les  frais  de  justice  En  Egard  au  temp  present  avons  fix^  et  taxd 
les  frais  de  justice  ainsy  quil  suit 

Premierement  En  argent 

au  juge  de  Semaine 

par  chaque  sentence 5*^ 

par  chaque  vacation 10 

par  chaque  ordre 2.10 

au  greffier 

par  chaque  ordre 5 

par  chaque  sentence 5 

a  Ihuissier 

par  chaque  ordre 5 

par  chaques  ordres  de  Criee 3 

p^  afiche  Et  publication 2 

par  chaque  vacation  aux  Encan  de  2  heures  J 3 

pour  une  saisie  provisoire 5 

p^  une  jdg  executoire 10 

Et  pour  tous  autres  frais  ils  subsisteront  Comme  sur  Lancien 
pieds 

arreste  lesd*  jour  Et  an. 

Labuxiere  gfer  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr.  Sidant 

a  la  meme  Cour  a  Et^  decide  Entre  les  sept  magistrat  que 
le  s^  LaCroix  Restera  juge  de  Semaine. 

La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  i^'"  8^^"^  1785. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr.  Sidan 

a  la  meme  Cour  Entre  le  s'"  jean  B^®  Gaffe  demandeur  Contre 
antoine  harmand  dit  Sans  facon  deffendeur  En  Confirmant  la 
sentance  de  la  Cour  En  datte  du  4.  9^^®  dernier  Nous  condamnons 
le  s^  harmand  a  rembourser  au  s^  Gaff^  les  frais  quil  a  fait  p^ 
Racommoder  la  voiture  quil  a  preste  aud*  s^  harmand  Et  ce  Sans 
delais  Et  aux  depens. 

La  Cour  ajournde  au  i^""  8^^^  1785. 

Labuxiere  gfier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr.  Sidan 

1  The  justice  of  the  week  was  chosen  by  the  court  to  hold  weekly  sessions  between  the 
sessions  of  the  court.  There  is  in  Belleville,  111.,  a  record  of  this  court  from  July  9,  1785,  to 
February  14,  1786.  It  contains  only  sixteen  pages,  and  there  is  little  of  interest  in  it.  The 
ourt  is  called  "reformed  " 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1785  201 

At  the  same  Court  the  magistrates  wishing  to  establish  a  list 
of  fixed  prices  for  the  costs  of  justice  with  reference  to  the  present 
time,  have  established  and  do  establish  the  costs  of  justice  as 
follows: 
First  in  cash. 

To  the  justice  of  the  week '  livres. 

For  each  judgment      5 

For  each  vacation  ^ 10 

For  each  writ       2.  10 

To  the  clerk 

For  each  writ 5 

For  each  judgment       5 

To  the  huissier. 

For  each  writ 5 

For  each  order  to  be  proclaimed      3 

For  placard  and  publication         2 

For  each  sitting  at  an  auction  of  2  J  hours    3 

For  a  provisional  seizure         5 

For  an  execution  10 

And  all  other  cost  shall  continue  on  the  former  scale. 

Ordered  this  said  day  and  year. 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  President. 

At  the  same  Court  it  was  decided  by  the  seven  magistrates  that 
M.  LaCroix  shall  remain  justice  of  the  week. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  November  i,  1785. 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  President. 

At  the  same  Court  in  the  suit  between  M.  Jean  Bte.  Gaffe, 
plaintiff  and  Antoine  Harmand  called  Sansfajon,  defendant, 
we  confirm  the  decree  of  the  Court  of  the  4th  of  November 
last  and  condemn  M.  Harmand  to  reimburse  M.  Gaffe  for  the 
costs  he  has  incurred  in  repairing  his  pirogue,  which  he  lent  M. 
Harmand,  and  that  without  delay,  and  to  pay  the  costs. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  October  i,  1785. 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  President. 

^  Vacation,  time  spent  in  performing  some  official  act;  in  this  case  some  act  not  ending 
in  a  judgment,  hence  belonging  to  non-litigious  judicial  acts,  such  as  appointing  a  guardian, 
settling  an  estate,  etc. 


202  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  i«^  8^^^  1785. 
President  M'"  LaCroix  Philip  Engel 

ant  girardin  charles  Ducharme 

Tho.  Brady  '  f^  Courier 

B*e  dubuc  ^ 

Les  Magistrats  Etants  assembles  la  Cour  seante  apr^s  avoir 
murement  delibere  Entreux  Sur  les  Circonstances  malheureuses 
du  tems  ou  il  y  a  ny  recoltes,  ny  argent,  de  plus  la  perte  des  Bes- 
itaux  occasionnee  par  linondation  Et  maladie  Contagieuse.  la  Cour 
considerant  que  les  habitants  de  ce.  district  par  tous  les  fleaux 
qui  leufs  Sont  arrivez  Sont  En  Retard  de  payer  leurs  debtes  Et 
que  leurs  Creanciers  Sans  avoir  Egard  a  leurs  miseres  leurs  font 
vendre  leurs  effets  Et  Bestiaux  p^  un  vil  prix  aux  trois  quarts  de 
leurs  valeur,  ce  qui  Ruine  totalement  Lesdits  habitans  Et  voulant 
Remedier  a  un  mal  aussi  dangereux  Et  Si  Ruineux  au  public,  la 
Cour  a  decide  Et  decide  que  tout  Creanciers  ne  poura  faire  vendre 
Les  Biens  de  Son  debiteur  quant  a  present  vu  le  manque  despece  Et 
de  pelterie  qui  metent  Les  debiteurs  hors  detat  de  payer,  mais 
que  les  Effets  qui  seront  Saisis  aux  dits  debiteurs  Seront  Estimez 
par  arbitres  Et  gens  Connoisseurs  Et  que  Le  Creancier  Sera 
obligd  de  les  prendre  au  prix  de  Lestimation  Si  mieux  il  naime 
accorder  du  tems  aud*  debiteur  En  payant  Linterest. 
[Signed] 

T  Brady  a*  Girardin 

B  Dubuq  Ch  DuCharme 

Phillipe  Engel  J  B  H  LaCroix  p.  sd 

Labuxiere  grefier 
a  la  meme  Cour 
Le  S^  motard  demandeur  Contre   Le  S^  Bouvet  Lamarche 

deffendeur 
vu  la  requet  du  S^  motard  expositive  que  le  deffendeur  luy  doit 
une  somme  de  Cinq  cent  quarante  six  livres  Cinq  sols  pour  mar- 
chandises  par  Son  compte,  quil  luy  a  vendu  du  mahis  p^  partie  de 

'  The  flood  of  1785  was  one  of  the  severest  in  the  history  of  the  Mississippi.  The  water 
extended  to  the  bluffs  on  both  sides  The  people  of  Cahokia  and  Kaskaskia  were  obhged 
to  seek  shelter  on  the  higher  ground.  At  Kaskaskia  many  houses  were  swept  away.  The 
western  bank  suffered  no  less  severely,  and  the  old  village  of  Ste.  Genevieve  was  deserted  for  a 
site  more  protected  from  the  river. — Dodge  to  Wm.  Clark,  Oct,  18,  1785,  Dr.  MSS.  1M126. 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1785  203 

At  a  Court,  October  i ,  1785. 

President,  M.  LaCroix.  Philippe  Engel. 

Ant.  Girardin.  Charles  DuCharme. 

Tho.  Brady.  Fr.  Courier. 

Bte.  Dubuque. 
The  magistrates  being  assembled  and  the  Court  in  session, 
after  carefully  deliberating  on  the  unhappy  conditions  of  the  time, 
when  there  are  neither  crops  nor  money;  and  considering  further- 
more the  loss  of  the  cattle  occasioned  by  the  inundations  and  con- 
tagious disease ;  ^  and  considering  that  the  inhabitants  of  this  dis- 
trict on  account  of  all  the  troubles,  which  have  occurred,  are  back- 
ward in  paying  their  debts  and  that  their  creditors  without  heed  to 
their  miseries  are  having  their  goods  and  cattle  sold  for  a  low  price 
at  three  fourths  of  their  value,  which  is  ruining  the  said  inhabitants 
totally;  and  wishing  to  remedy  an  evil  so  dangerous  and  so  ruinous 
to  the  public,  the  Court  has  decided  and  decides  that  no  creditor 
can  have  the  property  of  his  debtor  sold,  as  at  present,  because  of 
the  lack  of  money  and  peltries,  which  puts  the  debtors  out  of  position 
to  pay;  but  that  the  goods  of  the  said  debtors,  which  shall  be  seized, 
shall  be  appraised  by  arbitrators  and  appraisers  and  the  creditor 
shall  be  obliged  to  take  them  at  the  appraised  price,  if  he  does  not 
prefer  to  allow  the  debtor  time  on  condition  of  paying  interest. 
[Signed.] 

T.  Brady.  Ant.  Girardin. 

B.  Dubuque.  Ch.  DuCharme. 

Philippe  Engel.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  President. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk. 

At  the  same  Court. 
M.  MoTARD,  Plaintiff  vs.  M.  Bouvet  Lamarche  Defendant. 
The  explanatory  petition  of  M.  Motard  was  examined,  in 
which  he  says  that  the  defendant  owes  him  the  sum  of  five  hun- 
dred and  forty-six  livres  five  sols  for  merchandise  according  to 
his  account  and  that  the  latter  sold  him  corn  for  part  of  the 
said  sum  without  knowing  the  quantity  that  he  had  in  his  barn, 
which  did  not  amount  to  eighty  sacks,  and  that  the  plaintiff  had 
bought  it  at  the  rate  of  fifty  jrancs  the  load  of  eighteen  sacks 


204  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

ladite  somme  sans  savoir  la  quantite  quil  y  avoit  dans  son  grenier 
qui  naloit  pas  a  quatre  vingt  sacs,  quil  lavoit  achete  sur  le  pieds 
de  Cinquante  franc  la  tomber^e  de  dixhuit  sacs  de  deux  minots. 
mais  que  par  une  autre  Convention  led*  Bouvet  devoit  mener  Le 
mahis  a  S*  Louis  ou  il  devoit  Etre  mesurd  Et  le  Demandeur  de- 
voit le  payer  60^^  la  tomberde  Et  devoit  luy  fournir  une  voiture 
p^  le  Charoyer  seulement  que  quelque  jour  apres  led*  Bouvet  a 
vendu  le  mahis  Et  que  le  S'"  Bouvet  luy  a  fait  manquer  a  Ses  En- 
gagement par  ledeffaudde  luylivrerle  mahis  oy  [sic]  le  d*  Bouvet 
En  Ses  deffences  qui  a  dit  que  le  s^  motard  luy  avoit  livrd  une 
voiture  Sans  tolet  ny  Rames  Et  quil  navoit  pas  sans  servir  Et 
que  par  ce  retard  Et  diminution  quil  y  avoit  Eu  sur  le  mahis  il 
lavoit  vendii  Et  quil  ne  desavouoit  pas  devoir  ladite  somme  le 
tout  Considere  La  Cour  a  decide  que  led*  Bouvet  payera  la  som- 
me de  Cinq  cent  quarante  six  livres  Cinq  sols  quil  doit  aud*  s'" 
motard  Et  ce  Sous  un  mois  de  ce  jour  Et  au  deffaud  quil  Sera 
saisy  de  Ses  Effets  pour  ladite  somme  Et  Estimez  par  arbitres 
Lesquels  Effets  led*  s''  motard  sera  tenu  de  prendre  au  prix  de 
lestimation  si  mieux  il  naime  donner  plus  long  terme  aud*  Bouvet 
En  payant  linterest  a  raison  de  Cinq  pour  Cent  Et  Condamnons 
led*  Bouvet  aux  jfrais  que  nous  avons  liquidez  a  la  Somme 
de  quinze  livres  ce  qui  sera  execute  la  Cour  seante  tenue  par 
M^  LaCroix  presidant  M^  antoine  girardin  Thom  Bredy  B*« 
Dubuc,  philipe  Engel,  Charle  duCharme  Et  fr  Courier  lesd* 
jour  Et  an. 

J  B  H  LaCroix 

a  la  meme  Cour 

M^  Antoine  girardin  apelant  de  la  Sentence  arbitrale  Rendu 
Contre  le  7  7^^^  dernier  Contre  le  S^  Izaac  Levy  Deffendeur 
Et  demandeur. 

Les  parties  ayant  parii  a  ladite  Cour  seante  ced*  jour  Sont  Con- 
venu  de  Sen  Raporter  a  la  decizion  sans  apel  de  M^^  Thom  Bredy, 
philipe  Engel  francois  Courier  Et  charles  ducharme  magistrats 
Lesquels  aprds  etre  Bien  Et  murement  instruit  des  Raisons  qui 
font  la  Contestation  du  Boeufs  en  difficulte  Entre  le  demandeur 
et  le  deffendeur  Et  se  trouvant  les  dits  S'^^  quatre  magistra  de  deux 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1785  205 

of  two  minots  each;  but  that  by  another  agreement  the  said 
Bouvet  was  to  deliver  the  com  at  St.  Louis,  where  it  was  to  be 
measured  and  the  plaintiff  was  to  pay  him  60  livres  the  load 
and  to  furnish  him  a  boat  merely  for  transporting  it;  and  that 
some  days  later  the  said  Bouvet  sold  the  corn  and  caused  the 
plaintiff  to  fail  in  his  engagements, because  the  said  Bouvet  did 
not  deliver  him  the  com.  Heard  the  said  Bouvet  in  his  defence, 
who  said  that  M.  Motard  had  delivered  him  a  boat  without 
tholes  and  oars  and  that  he  had  not  been  able  to  use  it,  and 
that  on  account  of  the  delay  aivi  the  decrease  there  was  in  the 
com  he  had  sold  it,  and  that  he  did  not  deny  that  he  owed  the  said 
sum.  After  aU  was  considered,  the  Court  decided  that  the  said 
M.  Bouvet  shall  pay  the  sum  of  five  hundred  and  forty-six  livres 
five  sols  which  he  owes  M.  Motard  and  this  within  a  month 
from  this  day,  and  in  default  of  payment  that  there  shall  be  a 
seizure  of  his  goods  for  the  said  sum  and  they  shall  be  appraised  by 
arbitrators;  which  goods  the  said  M.  Motard  shall  be  bound  to  take 
at  the  price  of  the  appraisement,  unless  he  prefers  to  give  the  said 
Bouvet  a  longer  term  and  receive  interest  at  the  rate  of  five  per  cent. 
And  we  condemn  the  said  Bouvet  to  pay  the  costs,  which  we  have 
set  at  fifteen  livres,  for  which  there  will  be  execution.  At  the 
session  of  the  Court  held  by  M.  LaCroix,  President,  MM.  Ant. 
Girardin,  Tom.  Brady,  Bte.  Dubuque,  Philippe  Engel,  Charles 
DuCharme,  and  Fr.  Courier,  this  said  day  and  year. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 
At  the  same  Court. 

M.  Antoine  Girardin,  appealing  from  the  sentence  by  arbi- 
tration rendered  against  him  the  7th  of  September  last,  vs.  M. 
Isaac  Levy,  plaintiff  and  defendant. 

The  parties  appeared  at  the  said  session  of  the  Court  this  day 
and  agreed  to  refer  their  cause  without  right  of  appeal  to  the  de- 
cision of  MM.  Tom.  Brady,  Philippe  Engel,  Francois  Courier 
and  Charles  DuCharme,  magistrates.  After  being  well  and  care- 
fully instructed  in  the  grounds  of  the  contest  about  the  ox  in  dis- 
pute between  the  plaintiff  and  the  defendant,  the  four  magis- 
trates finding  themselves  divided  in  opinion  called  in  M.  Francois 


2o6  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

avis  dififerents  ont  apell^  M'^  francois  trotier  pour  Cinquiesme 
juge.  les  autres  magistrals  nayant  pu  donner  leur  voix  p^  etre 
temoins  ou  ayant  Servy  dans  la  p^®  Cause,  cest  pour  quoy  nous 
magistrals  Cy  devant  Nommes  Sommes  davis  Et  notre  decizion 
est  que  M^  girardin  remetra  un  Boeuf  au  S'"  Levy  du  meme  age  de 
celuy  qui  fait  actuellement  la  matiere  de  la  Contestation.  Lequel 
Boeuf  Led*  s^  Levy  sera  Contraiht  de  recevoir  en  place  de  celuy 
vendu  de  bonne  foy  par  le  s'"  girardin  au  s^  forget  Et  les  condam- 
nons  a  payer  Chacun  La  moitie  des  frais  qui  ont  Ete  fait  Et  ceux 
fait  p^  la  presente  sentence  ce  qui  sera  execute  sans  aucun  apel  ny 
Renvoy  a  autre  seance  tel  est  notre  opinion  Et  notre  decizion. 

[Signed] 

DuCharme  fr  trottier 

Phillipe  Engel  T  Bredy 

Labuxiere  grefier 

La  Cour  est  ajourne  au  deux  de  Janvier  et  a  Nomme  M^ 
Charle  ducharme  pour  juge  de  Semaine  Lequel  a  accepte  ladite 
Charge.  Ch  DuCharme. 

aujourdhuy  Septieme  jour  doctobre  mil  Sept  Cent  quatre  vingt 
Cinq  a  la  requisition  du  s'"  Izaac  Levy  la  Cour  Setant  assembl^e 
pour  recevoir  le  Serment  dofhce  de  douze  jures  pour  decider  Et 
reviser  laffaire  dEntre  Led*  S'^  Levy  Et  le  S^  antoine  Girardin. 

Lesdits  S^^  jures  Etants  Comparus  cejourdhuy  Pardevant  ladite 
Cour  savoir  les  S'^^  bergeron  Louis  gau,  Paul  poupart  Louis  Pillet, 
antoine  Boyer,  Charles  Lefevre  mathieu  Saucier,  philipe  Gervais 
pierre  martin,  B*^  Dumay,  Raphael  Gagnez,  pierre  Laperche  dit  S* 
jean,  Les  quels  apres  avoir  fait  aparoir  de  Lassignation  qui  leur 
a  Ete  donnee  Le  jour  de  hier  la  Cour  leur  a  fait  faire  sermant  dof- 
fice  Sur  les  Saints  Evangile  de  decider  En  leur  ame  Et  Conscience 
ladite  contestation  au  Sujet  du  Boeuf  qui  fait  la  matiere  du  proces 
Entre  les  parties  Et  ont  promis  Et  jure  dy  proceder  suivant  Leurs 
Sermant  Les  pieces  Et  Sentence  cy  devant  Rendues  leurs  ayant 

1  This  is  in  accordance  with  the  law  governing  arbitration.     See  supra,  p.  i6o,  note  i. 

2  This  case  was  begun  by  Levy  bringing  suit  against  Lapance  for  the  ox  in  the  court  of 
the  justice  of  the  week,  September  7,  1785.  Girardin  declared  that  the  ox  was  his,  when  he 
sold  it  to  Lapance,  and  offered  as  proof  that  his  brand  as  well  as  Levy's  was  on  the  animal. 
Arbitrators  were  appointed,  who  decided  in  favor  of  Levy.  Two  days  later  Girardin  appealed 
from  the  decision. — Record  of  the  justice  of  the  week  in  Belleville,  111. 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1785  207 

Trottier  as  a  fifth  judge.  The  other  magistrates  were  not  able 
to  give  their  opinion,  since  they  were  either  witnesses  or  had 
served  in  the  first  suit^  For  this  reason  we,  the  magistrates 
herebefore  named,  are  of  the  opinion,  and  our  decision  is,  that  M. 
Girardin  shall  return  to  M.  Levy  an  ox  of  the  same  age  as  that 
which  is  at  present  the  subject  of  the  contestation;  which  ox  the  said 
M.  Levy  shall  be  compelled  to  accept  in  place  of  the  one  sold  in  good 
faith  by  M.  Girardin  to  M.  Forget;  and  we  condemn  each  to  pay  half 
of  the  costs,  which  have  been  made,  and  those  made  for  the  present 
judgment,  for  which  there  will  be  execution  without  any  appeal  or 
reference  to  another  session;  such  is  our  opinion  and  our  decision.^ 

[Signed] 

Fr.  Trottier  DuCharme. 

T.  Brady.  Philip  Engel. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  Second  of  January  and  named 
M.  Charles  DuCharme  as  judge  of  the  week  and  he  accepted  the 
said  ofiice. 

To-day  the  seventh  day  of  October,  1785,  on  the  application 
of  M.  Isaac  Levy  the  Court  was  assembled  to  receive  the  oath  of 
office  of  a  dozen  jurors  to  decide  and  revise  the  case  between  M. 
Levy  and  M.  Antoine  Girardin. 

The  said  MM.  jurors  appeared  to-day  before  the  said  Court, 
to  wit:  MM.  Bergeron,  Louis  Gaud,  Paul  Poupar,  Louis  Pillet, 
Antoine  Boyer,  Charles  Lefevre,  Matthieu  Saucier,  Philippe  Ger- 
vais,  Pierre  Martin,  Bte.  Dumay,  Raphael  Gagn^,  Pierre  La- 
perche  called  St.  Jean,  and,  after  having  shown  their  summonses 
given  them  yesterday,  the  Court  made  them  take  the  oath  of  office 
on  the  Holy  Gospels  to  decide  on  their  conscience  the  said  litigation 
in  regard  to  the  ox  which  makes  the  matter  of  the  suit  between  the 
parties,  and  they  have  promised  and  sworn  to  act  according  to  their 
oaths.  The  documents  and  judgment  heretofore  rendered  were 
placed  in  their  hands  this  day  by  us,  Charles  DuCharme,  Bte.  La- 
croix.  President,  B.  Dubuque,  Tom.  Brady  and  Francois  Courier. 

At  the  session  of  the  Court  the  said  day  and  year. 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  President. 


2o8  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Et^  remise  En  main  cejourdhuy.  par  nous  Charles  DuCharme 
B*e  LaCroix  presidant,  B*«  Dubuc,  Thorn  Bredy,  Et  francois 
Courier. 

La  Cour  seante  lesd*^  jour  Et  an. 

Labuxiere  greffier  J  B  H  LaCroix  p  sd 

Et  a  linstant  led*  S'^  Levy  a  fait  paroitre  armant  teller  pour  ren- 
dre  temoinage  Sur  ce  quil  Salt  a  loccasion  du  Boeuf  Et  a  linstant 
led*  amant  teller  Etant  Comparii  luy  avons  fait  faire  Sermant  de 
dire  la  verite  Sur  ce  qui  est  a  Sa  Connoissance  a  ce  sujet  devan 
Lesd*  s^  jures  Et  a  dit  ne  savoir  signer  Lesd*  jour  Et  an. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr.  sd 

Led*  S^  Levy  a  fait  comparoitre  aussi  le*  S^  philipe  Engel  pour 
rendre  temoinage  Sur  ce  qui  est  a  Sa  Connoissance  a  loccasion  du 
Boeuf  en  Contestation  lequel  a  linstant  Etant  Comparti  luy  avons 
fait  faire  Sermant  de  dire  la  verite  a  M^^  Les  jurez  Sur  ce  qui  est 
a  sa  Connoissance  et  a  Signd  lesd*  jour  Et  an. 

Philipe  Engel 
Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr  sd 

Le  S^  Girardin  a  fait  comparoitre  francois  alexandre  habitant 
de  la  pr^®  du  pont  pour  rendre  temoinage  devant  M^^  Les  jures  de 
ce  qui  est  a  Sa  Connoissance  sur  le  Boeuf  En  Contestation,  lequel 
aprds  sermant  fait  devant  M^^  les  magistrats  Sur  les  Saints  Evan- 
giles  a  promis  Et  jur^  de  repondre  Et  declarer  selon  la  verite  Sur 
tout  ce  quil  sait  concernant  led*  Boeuf  Et  ditne  savoir  signer  lesd*. 
jour  Et  an. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr  sd 

Et  led*  jour  Sept  octobre  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  Cinq.  Nous 
Jean  B*^  Bergeron,  Louis  Gau,  Paul  poupart,  Louis  Pilet,  antoine 
Boyer,  Charle  Lefevre,  Mathieu  Saucier,  Philipe  Gervais,  p^® 
martin,  B*®  DuMay,  Raphael  Gagnez  Et  pierre  Laperche  tous 
jures  Nommes  par  M^^  Les  magistrats  pour  decider  Le  proces  en 
Contestations  dEntre  le  S^  Izaac  Levy  et  le  S^  antoine  Girardin  ouy 
Les  Deux  parties  En  leurs  demandes  repliques,  reponses  Et  Con- 
testations remontrances,  dires  Et  requisitions  quils  nous  ont  fait 
verbalement  par  leur  Bouche  avantnotre  decizipn,  Ensemble  La 
deposition  de  amant  teller,  de  francois  alexandre  du  S'^  philipe 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1785  209 

And  now  the  said  M.  Levy  summoned  Armant  Tellier  to  give 
testimony  of  what  he  knew  about  the  ox.  The  said  Armant 
Tellier  now  appeared  and  we  caused  him  to  make  oath  to  tell 
the  truth  about  what  was  within  his  knowledge  on  this  subject 
before  the  said  MM.  jurors ;  and  he  said  that  he  did  not  know  how 
to  sign  his  name  the  said  day  and  year. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  President. 

The  said  M.  Levy  summoned  also  M.  Philippe  Engel  to  give 
testimony  of  what  was  within  his  knowledge  about  the  ox  in 
dispute.  He  now  appeared  and  we  caused  him  to  make  oath  to  tell 
the  truth  to  MM.  the  jurors  about  what  is  within  his  knowledge; 
and  he  has  signed  the  said  day  and  year. 

Philippe  Engel. 

Labuxiere.  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

The  said  M.  Girardin  summoned  Francois  Alexandre, 
inhabitant  of  Prairie  du  Pont,  to  give  testimony  before  MM.  the 
jurors  of  what  was  within  his  knowledge  about  the  ox  in  dispute ; 
and  he,  after  oath  was  made  on  the  Holy  Gospels  before  MM. 
the  magistrates,  has  promised  and  sworn  to  answer  and  declare 
according  to  the  truth  in  regard  to  all  that  he  knows  concerning  the 
said  ox;  and  he  said  that  he  did  not  know  how  to  sign  the  said 
day  and  year. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

The  said  day  the  seventh  of  October,  1785,  we  Jean  Bte.  Ber- 
geron, Louis  Gaud,  Paul  Poupar,  Louis  Pillet,  Antoine  Boyer, 
Charles  Lefevre,  Matthieu  Saucier,  Philippe  Gervais,  Pierre  Mar- 
tin, Bte.  Dumay,  Raphael  Gagnd  and  Pierre  Laperche,  all  jurors 
appointed  by  MM.  the  magistrates  to  decide  the  case  in  dispute 
between  M.  Isaac  Levy  and  M.  Antoine  Girardin,  after  hearing 
the  two  parties  in  their  prayers,  replies,  responses,  contestations, 
remonstrances,  pleadings  and  applications,  which  they  have  made 
to  us  verbally  by  word  of  mouth  before  our  decision,  together 
with  the  depositions  of  Armant  Tellier,  Franfois  Alexandre  and 
Philippe  Engel,  which  they  have  made  on  oath  before  us,  and  after 
examining  the  petitions  and  the  documents  produced  by  M. 
Girardin  as  well  as  the  certificate,  act  of  appeal  and  judgment 


2IO 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


angel  quils  ont  fait  devant  Nous  par  Sermant,  Les  requetes  Et 
pieces  a  Nous  produites  par  le  S^  girardin  tant  certificat  acte  dapel 
que  sentences  Rendues  sur  les  registres  daudience  Le  tout  dont 
nous  avons  pris  une  parfaite  connoissance  et  nous  etre  instruit  de 
1  affaire  concernant  le  Boeuf  en  Contestation  depuis  le  Commence- 
ment de  la  p^®  visite  jusqua  ce  jour,  Et  avoir  fait  ce  dit  jour  visite 
dud^  Boeuf  Et  des  Etampes  Sur  la  fesse  apres  la  voir  fait  razer  pour 
plus  grande  surete  Et  Eclaircissement,  Et  apres  Etre  plainement 
instruit  de  toute  Ladite  Contestations  et  avoir  donn^  notre  opinion, 
Selon  Nos  ames  Et  conscience  En  consequance  du  sermant  que 
nous  avons  fait  Nous  sommes  tous  davis  Et  condamnons  M^ 
antoine  Girardin  a  rendre  Le  meme  Boeuf  quil  a  vendu  au  s'' 
Joseph  Lapensee,  au  S^  Levy  Comme  Etant  Son  propre  Boeuf  a 
quoyfairele  S^  Joseph  Lapensee  Contraint.  Solidairement  avec 
led^  s^  Girardin  comme  led^  Boeuf  se  trouvant  actuellement  En  la 
pocession  dud^  Joseph  Lapensee,  Sauf  aud^  S^  Girardin  et  La- 
pensee de  Saranger  Ensemble  pour  se  faire  Raison  dud^  Boeuf 
En  en  [sic]  remetant  un  autre  aud^  Lapensee  ou  Saranger 
Comme  Bon  luy  semblera.  Sans  pouvoir  par  led^  s^  Girardin  ny 
lapensee  retenir  plus  longtems  led*  Boeuf  En  Contestation  qui 
sera  Remis  aud*  S'^  Levy  sous  vingt  quatre  heures  Et  en  outre 
Condamnons  M^  antoine  girardin  En  tous  les  frais  Et  depens 
depuis  le  Commencement  du  proces  jusqua  ce  jour  Lesquels  frais 
Seront  liquidez  par  la  Cour,  telle  est  notre  opinion  et  notre 
decizion  Et  avons  signe  Et  fait  nos  marques  ord^^^  lesd*  jour  et  an. 
[Signed] 

Louis  gaud 

marque  de 
+ 

pierre  martin 
marque 


Mth.  Saucier 
marque  de 

+ 
Charles  Lefevre 
marque  de 

+ 
B*^  Dumay 
marque 

+ 
dantoine  Boyer 


Bergeron 
marque  de 

+ 
raphael  Gagnez 


pierre  Laperche 
marque  de 

+ 
Louis  pilet 
marque  de 

+ 
Philipe  Gervais 
marque  de 

+ 
paul  poupart 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1785 


211 


rendered  on  the  registers  of  the  Court,  of  all  which  we  have 
received  a  perfect  knowledge,  and  after  we  have  instructed 
ourselves  of  the  cause  concerning  the  ox  in  dispute,  since  the 
first  inspection  up  to  this  day;  and  after  we  have  made  this  said 
day  an  inspection  of  the  said  ox  and  of  the  mark  on  the  buttock, 
after  having  it  shaved  for  greater  sureness  and  clearness;  and 
after  being  fully  instructed  of  all  the  said  litigation  and  having 
given  our  votes  according  to  our  conscience  in  consequence  of 
the  oath  which  we  have  taken;  we  are  all  agreed  and  condemn 
Antoine  Girardin  to  return  to  M.  Levy,  as  it  is  his  own, 
the  same  ox  which  the  former  sold  to  M.  Joseph  Lapanc^,  to 
which  M.  Joseph  Lapanc^  is  constrained  conjointly  and  severally 
with  the  said  M.  Girardin,  since  the  ox  is  at  present  in 
the  possession  of  the  said  Joseph  Lapanc^,  reserving  to  the 
said  MM.  Girardin  and  Lapance  to  make  arrangements  together 
to  do  each  other  justice  for  the  said  ox  either  by  gift  of  another 
to  the  said  Lapance  from  M.  Girardin  or  by  making  arrangements 
as  seem  good  to  them;  without  power  by  the  said  M.  Girardin  or 
Lapance  to  retain  the  ox  in  litigation  a  longer  time,  but  it  shall 
be  returned  to  the  said  M.  Levy  within  twenty-four  hours:  and 
furthermore  we  condemn  M.  Antoine  Girardin  to  pay  all  costs  and 
charges  from  the  commencement  of  the  suit  up  to  this  day,  which 
costs  shall  be  determined  by  the  Court.  Such  is  our  opinion  and 
our  decision,  and  we  have  signed  and  made  our  marks  this  said 
day  and  year. 


Mth.  Saucier. 
Mark  of 

Louis  Gaud. 
Mark  of 

Pierre  Laperche 
Mark  of 

+ 
Charles  Lefevre 
Mark  of 

+ 
Pierre  Martin 
Mark  of 

+ 
Louis  Pillet 
Mark  of 

+ 
Bte.  Dumay 
Mark  of 

+ 
Bergeron 
Mark  of 

+ 
Philippe  Gervais 
Mark  of 

+ 
Antoine  Boyer 

+ 
Raphael  Gagn 

+ 
i6        Paul  Poupart 

212  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Veu  par  la  Cour  la  Sentence  de  lautre  part  laquelle  nous  con- 
firmons  Et  homologuons  par  ces  presentes  et  ordonons  quelle  Sor- 
tira  son  plain  et  Entier  Effets  Et  avons  sign^  lesd*  jour  Et  an. 
[Signed] 
marque  de  DuCharme 

+  Brady 

fr.  Courier  J  B  H  LaCroix. 

B  Dubuque 
Labuxiere  grefier 
aujourdhuy  huitiesme  jour  doctobre  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt 
Cinq  Est  Comparu  au  grefife  de  ce  siege  le  S^  jean  B*^  LaCroix 
porteur  du  billet  cy  aprds  lequel  men  a  requis  moy  grefier  Sousign^ 
Lenregistrement  portant  ce  qui  Suit. 

En  presence  des  temoins  Sousign^  moi  jean  marie  durant  Sous 
ma  marque  je  promet  et  moblige  payer  a  la  N^^^  Orleans  a  lordre 
du  S^  jean  B*^  laCroix  la  Somme  de  Cent  quatre  vingt  dix  neuf 
livres  En  argent  pour  pareille  Somme  que  led*  S^  ma  prete  aux 
Cahos  le  20.  aoust  1784.  Signe  dun  +  p^  marque  de  J.  M.  durant, 
fr  saucier  temoin.  Et  apres  led*  Enregistrement  fait  led*  original 
a  Ete  remis  par  moy  greffier  Sousigne  aud*  S^  jean  B*^  LaCroix 
qui  a  Signe  avec  moi  lesd*  jour  Et  an. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix. 

du    12.    9^^e    jyg^^ 

a  une  Cour  tenue  Extraordinairement  par  Les  magistrats  cy 
apres  Nommes. 

M^""  Charles  ducharme  Thom  Bredy 

.      J  B*e  Dubuque  Philipe  Engel 

Le  S^  Jean  B*«  LaCroix  demandeur 

Le  demandeur  Suplie  la  Cour  de  luy  accorder  Sa  demission 

pour  la  traite  des  Sauvages  En  ce  village  ainsi  quelle  luy  avoit  Ete 

accordee  par  une  Sentence  de  ladite  Cour  du  8  mars   1782.  Et 

confirmee  par  une  autre  Sentence  de  la  meme  Cour  du  29  8^^^ 

1  This  should  have  been  entered  in  the  book  of  record,  which  is  printed  hereafter,  pp.  449 
et  seq.  Its  registration  here  may  be  due  to  an  error  of  the  clerk,  but  from  now  on  this  book  is 
occasionally  used  in  this  way. 

2  See  also  pp.  125,  575. 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1785  213 

The  judgment  of  the  other  part  being  duly  considered  by  the 
Court,  we  confirm  and  sustain  it  by  these  presents  and  order  that 
it  shall  have  its  full  and  entire  efifect;  and  we  have  signed  this  said 
day  and  year. 
[Signed] 

Mark  of  Ducharme 

+  Brady 

Fr. Courier  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix 

B.  Dubuque  Labuxiere,  Clerk. 

To-day,  the  eighth  day  of  October,  1785,  there  has  appeared  a 
the  record-office  of  this  jurisdiction  M.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix  bearing 
the  following  note,  and  he  required  of  me,  the  undersigned  clerk, 
the  registration  thereof,  and  it  contains  what  follows: 

In  the  presence  of  the  undersigned  witnesses,  I,  John  Marie 
Durand,  under  my  mark,  promise  and  bind  myself  to  pay  at  New 
Orleans  to  the  order  of  M.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix  the  sum  of  one 
hundred  and  ninety-nine  livres  in  money  in  return  for  a  like  sum 
which  the  said  gentleman  has  loaned  me  at  Cahokia,  the  20th  of 
August,  1784.  Signed  with  +  for  the  mark  of  J.  M.  Durand;  Fr. 
Saucier,  witness;  and  after  the  said  registration  was  made,  the 
said  original  was  returned  by  me,  the  undersigned  clerk,  to  M. 
Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  who  has  signed  with  me  the  said  day  and  year.^ 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

November  12,  1785. 
At  a  special  session  of  the  Court  held  by  the  magistrates  here- 
after named: 

MM.  Charles  DuCharme.  Thom.  Brady. 

J.  Bte.  Dubuque.  Philippe  Engel. 

M.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix  Petitioner 
The  petitioner  prays  the  Court  to  accept  his  resignation  of 
the  privilege  to  trade  with  the  savages  in  this  village  in  the  form  it 
was  granted  him  by  a  decree  of  the  said  Court,  March  8,  1782,^ 
and  confirmed  by  another  decree  of  the  said  Court  the  29th 
of  October  last,  for  reason  known  to  himself;  and  he  declares 
that  he  abandons  and  leaves  it  to  the  Court  to  make  orders  in 
regard  thereto. 


214  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

dernier  pour  raison  a  luy  Connue  declarant  quil  labandonne  Et 
laisse  a  la  disposition  de  la  Cour  den  ordonner. 

Veu  la  demande  du  S^  LaCroix  Nous  avons  Ennule  Sa  demis- 
sion Et  Le  dechargeons  de  la  traite  des  sauvages  En  ce  poste  Et 
de  toutes  les  conditions  aux  quelles  il  setoit  oblige  par  la  Sentence 
du  8  mars  1782. 

DuCharme  P.  sd. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix. 

Et  a  linstant  Sont  comparus  les  S^^  Izaac  Levy  Et  Thom  Bredy 
citoyen  de  ce  village  Les  quels  ont  suplie  La  Cour  de  leur  accorder 
la  meme  traite  Et  privilege  dont  le  S^  LaCroix  a  donne  Sa  demis- 
sion, o£frant  de  se  Conformer  a  la  sentence  du  8  mars  1782. 
surquoy  La  Cour  a  accorde  Et  accorde  aux  exposant  le  meme 
privilege  qui  avoit  Ete  cy  devant  donne  aud*  s^  LaCroix  Et  ont 
fait  Sermant  de  sy  Conformer  lesd^  jour  Et  an. 

Brady.  J  B  H  LaCroix  psd 

Labuxiere  grefier 

La  Cour  assembl^e  voulant  remedier  aux  abus  continuels  qui 
se  Commetent  journellement  dans  ce  village  par  lau  de  vie  qui  se 
versse  aux  sauvages  dont  il  En  resulte  des  Effets  tres  dangereux 
Et  pernissieux  au  bien  Et  a  la  tranquilite  publique. 

La  Cour  a  deffendu  Et  deffent  tres  empressement  a  toutes 
personnes  de  telle  qualite  Et  conditions  quelles  puissent  etre  de 
donner  aucunne  Boisson  Enyvrante  aux  Sauvages,  Sous  pretexte  de 
visite  de  Camarade,  de  Connoissance,  traite  ou  autrement,  pas 
meme  Seulement  un  Coup  Soit  a  leur  arrivee  ou  a  leur  depart  a 
peine  de  trois  cent  livres  damande,  de  Confiscation  de  la  traite, 
quils  auront  fait  Et  de  plus  grande  peine  En  Cas  de  residive.  dont 
les  Sauvages  Seront  Cru  Sur  leur  declaration  Sans  quil  Soit  Besoin 
de  plus  grande  preuve.  Et  les  Sauvages  Seront  arretes  jusqua 
ce  quils  ayent  fait  leur  declaration  Reservons  neantmoins  la 
liberte  a  M^  trotier  commandant  de  ce  village  den  donner  avec 
prudence  Et  moderation  lors  que  les  sauvages  viendront  Le  voir 
tant  pour  les  Conseil  que  pour  les  autres  occasions  ou  un  Com- 
mandant ne  pent  Sen  dispanser  ainsy  quil  est  dusage  donne  la 
Cour  Seante  lesd^  jour  Et  an.     Et  la  presente  Sera  lue  publide  Et 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1785  215 

In  view  of  the  prayer  of  M.  LaCroix  we  have  accepted  his  resig- 
nation and  relieved  him  of  the  trade  with  the  savages  in  this  post 
and  of  all  the  conditions  by  which  he  was  bound  by  the  decree  of 
March  8,  1782. 

DuCharme,  Pres. 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

And  now  appeared  MM.  Isaac  Levy  and  Tom.  Brady,  citizens 
of  this  village,  who  petitioned  the  Court  to  grant  them  the  same 
commerce  and  privileges,  of  which  M.  LaCroix  gave  his  resigna- 
tion, and  they  offer  to  conform  to  the  decree  of  March  8,  1782. 
Whereupon  the  Court  has  granted  and  does  grant  to  the  petitioners 
the  same  privilege,  which  had  been  herebefore  given  to  the  said  M. 
LaCroix;  and  they  have  made  oath  to  conform  thereto  the  said 
day  and  year. 

Brady.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk. 

The  Court  assembled  to  remedy  the  continual  abuses,  which 
are  daily  committed  in  this  village  through  the  liquor  which  is 
served  to  the  savages,  from  which  there  results  effects  very  danger- 
ous and  penicious  to  the  welfare  and  the  tranquillity  of  the  public. 

The  Court  has  forbidden  and  does  forbid  very  expressly  all 
persons,  of  whatever  quality  and  condition  they  may  be,  to  give 
any  intoxicating  drink,  even  a  draught,  to  the  savages  under 
pretext  of  social  visit,  of  acquaintance,  by  way  of  trade  or  other- 
wise, either  on  th6ir  arrival  or  their  departure,  on  pain  of  three 
hundred  livres  fine  and  confiscation  of  the  business  they  have 
made,  and  of  greater  punishment  in  case  of  second  offense;  in 
regard  to  which  the  savages  shall  be  believed  on  their  ajB&davit 
without  need  of  greater  proof,  and  the  savages  shall  be  held  until 
they  have  made  their  affidavit.  We  reserve,  however,  to  M. 
Trottier,  commandant  of  this  village,  the  liberty  to  give  some 
with  prudence  and  moderation,  when  the  savages  shall  come  to 
see  him  either  for  holding  councils  or  on  other  occasions  when  a 
commandant  cannot  dispense  therewith,  as  it  is  customary. 
Given  at  the  session  of  the  Court  the  said  day  and  year.  And  the 
present  decree  shall  be  read,  published  and  placarded  on  the  door 


2i6  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

afichde  a  la  porte  de  cette  Eglise  Et  signiffiee  au  marchand  Etran- 
ger  residant  En  ce  poste  a  ce  quils  nen  pretendent  Cause  dignor- 
ence. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  p  Si 

Public^  et  afich^e  p'  la  2^  fois  le  3  x^'*®  1786.  Labuxiere 

a  une  Cour  du  dix  neuf  Novembre  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt 
Cinq.  Le  S^  pierre  antoine  Thabault  a  fait  Serment  de  fidelity  aux 
Etats  unis  de  Lamerique  Et  promis  de  se  Conformer  aux  Edits  et 
reglements  du  Gouvernement  de  virginie  et  a  Signd  lesd*  jour  Et 
an.  P  A  Tabeau 

J  B  H  LaCroix  pr.sed.  Labuxiere 

a  la  meme  Cour 

M'*  Jean  Dumoulin  demandeur  contre  Pierre  Troge  deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  a  produit  un  billet  contre  le  deffendeur  de  la 
Somme  de  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  une  livres  quinze  sols  En  argent 
Echus  En  demandant  le  payement. 

Le  deffendeur  a  reconnu  le  Billet  Et  a  dit  Navoir  point  de  quoy 
le  payer  actuellement  quil  demdoit  \sic\  huit  jour  de  delais.  Pour 
saranger  avec  le  S^  Caillole  avec  qui  il  avoit  des  comptes.  le  de- 
mandeur a  replique  que  jusqua  ce  tems  M^LaCroix  ne  se  denantisse 
pas  de  quarante  Cinq  Sacs  de  mahis  quil  avoit  apartenants  aud* 
troge. 

La  Cour  faisant  droit  a  accorde  Le  delais  de  huit  jour  aud<^ 
troge  Et  jusqua  ce  tems  a  Saisy  conservatoire*  entre  les  mains  de 
M'"  LaCroix  les  quarante  Cinq  Sacs  de  mahis  p^  led*  tems  passd 
etre  ordonnd  ce  quil  apartiendra. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr.sd 

a  une  Cour  du  deux  Janvier  mil  sept  Cent  quatre  vingt  Six 
tenue  par 

Messieurs  jean  B*^  LaCroix,  presid*. 

Thom  Bredy  Philipe  angel 

j.  B*^  Dubuque  Charle  duCharme 

Les  habitans  du  grand  Ruisseau  ont  presente  une  Requete.  que 
la  dite  a  repondu  et  ordonne  que  les  representant  Seront  sommis 
a  cette  jurisdiction  comme  Etant  de  cette  dependance  sauf  a  eux 

1  Note  in  the  margin  by  the  clerk. 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1786  217 

of  this  church  and  announced  to  the  alien  merchants  residing  in 
this  post,  so  that  they  may  not  plead  the  cause  of  ignorance. 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

Published  and  placarded  for  the  second  time  December  3, 1786.^ 

Labuxiere. 
At  a  Court  the  19th  of  November,  1785,  M.  Pierre  Antoine 
Tabeau  made  oath  of  fidelity  to  the  United  States  of  America  and 
promised  to  conform  to  the  edicts  and  regulations  of  the  govern- 
ment of  Virginia,  and  has  signed  the  said  day  and  year. 

P.  A.  Tabeau. 
Labuxiere.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Jean  Dumoulin,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Troge,  Defendant. 
The  Plaintifif  produced  a  note  against  the  defendant  for  the 
sum   of   seven   hundred   and   eighty-one   livres   fifteen  sols  in 
money,  which  is  matured,  and  demands  payment. 

The  defendant  acknowledged  the  note  and  said  that  he  did  not 
have  wherewith  to  pay  at  present  and  demands  delay  for  a  week  to 
make  arrangements  with  M.  Caillot  with  whom  he  had  some 
accounts.  The  plaintiff  replied  that  until  that  time  M.  LaCroix 
ought  not  to  dispose  of  forty-five  sacks  of  corn,  which  he  had, 
belonging  to  the  said  Troge. 

The  Court  justly  granted  the  delay  of  a  week  to  the  said 
Troge  and  until  that  time  attached  for  security  the  forty-five  sacks 
of  corn  in  the  hands  of  M.  LaCroix,  that  orders  may  be  given  as 
may  be  fitting,  when  that  time  is  passed. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

At  a  Court  the  2nd  of  January,  1786,  held  by 
MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President.     Philippe  Engel. 
Tom  Brady.  Charles  DuCharme. 

J.  Bte.  Dubuque. 
The  inhabitants  of  the  Grand  Ruisseau  presented  a  petition, 
which  the  said  [Court]  answered  and  it  decrees  that  the  petitioners 
shall  be  submitted  to  this  jurisdiction  as  belonging  to  this  depend- 
ency, reserving  to  them  the  right  to  name  arbitrators  in  case  of  dis- 
putes in  their  affairs  occurring  among  them,  without  detracting  from 


2i8  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

de  nommer  des  arbitres  En  Gas  de  Contestation  dans  les  affaires 
qui  surviendront  Entreux  Sans  desroger  a  Ihotorit^  de  cette  dite 
Cour.  Et  leur  accorde  En  outre  de  Nommer  Entreux  un  Com- 
mandant pour  y  maintenir  le  Bon  ordre  Et  la  police  qui  sera  subor- 
donnd  au  Commandant  des  Cahos  Et  Sujet  a  luy  obeir  et  a  rece- 
voir  Ses  ordres  Et  qui  se  presentera  devant  cette  dite  Cour  pour 
preter  Sermant  dofice  Et  de  fidelite  avant  dexercer  aucun  pouvoir 
donnd  aux  Cahos  le  deux  Janvier  mil  sept  Cent  quatre  vingt  Six. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  prdt 

a  la  meme  Cour 
Le  S'"  Izaac  Levy  demandeur  Contre  Charles  LaCroix  for- 
GERON  deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  produit  un  Billet  de  la  Somme  de  huit  Cent 
livres  En  argent  dub  par  le  deffendeur  Et  Echu  demandant  que 
led*  deffendeur  Soit  Condamne  a  luy  En  payer  Sans  delais  le 
montant. 

ouy  aussi  le  deffendeur  qui  a  reconnu  Son  dit  Billet,  mais  quil 
est  convenu  verbalement  avec  le  s^  Levy  dans  le  tems  quil  luy  a 
fait  Ses  avances  de  prendre  des  Billets  dhabitants  En  payements. 
Et  que  cest  sa  Convention  sans  laquelle  il  Nauroit  Rien  pris  ches 
Le  S'"  Levy. 

Le  S^  Levy  a  replique  le  Contraire  Et  a  dit  quil  netoit  point 
Convent!  de  ce  fait  persistant  a  ce  que  le  deffendeur  Soit  Condamne 
a  luy  payer  ladite  somme  Sans  delais  N'Entendant  aucunnement 
prendre  des  Bons  dhabitant  En  payement. 

Led*  Charles  laCroix  a  soutenu  que  Led*  s'^  Levy  Etoit  Convent! 
verballement  de  prendre  lesd*  Bons  dhabitants  Et  que  Setoit  Sa 
Convention. 

Les  quelles  parties  N'ont  pu  donner  aucunnes  preuves  de  part 
ny  dautre  Et  le  billet  ne  faisant  aucunne  mention  de  ce  fait  parties 
ouyes  et  le  tout  Considere  Et  Examine  La  Cour  a  ordonne  Et 
ordonne  quil  sera  donne  aud*  Charles  laCroix  un  mois  de  Credy 
pour  retirer  ce  qui  luy  Est  dub  des  habitants  Soit  En  argent  ou 
danrees  au  prix  du  Cour.     les  quelles  payement  Seront  Remis 

1  The  currency  of  the  period  consisted  principally  of  what  were  called  "  peltry  bons ." 
They  were  notes,  issued  generally  by  the  merchants,  bearing  on  their  face  the  inscription  that 
they  were  good  (bon)  for  so  many  pounds  of  shaved  deer-skins.    These  were  used  in  all  the 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1786  219 

the  authority  of  this  said  Court;  and  it  grants  them  furthermore 
the  right  to  name  among  them  a  commandant  to  maintain  there 
good  order  and  police,  who  shall  be  subordinated  to  the  comman- 
dant of  Cahokia  and  obey  him  and  receive  his  orders,  and  who  shall 
present  himself  before  this  said  Court  to  take  the  oath  of  office  and 
of  fidelity  before  exercising  any  authority.  Given  at  Cahokia  the 
2nd  of  January,  1786. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

At  the  same  Court. 

M.  Isaac  Levy,  Plaintiff  vs.  Charles  LaCroix,  blacksmith, 

defendant. 

The  plaintiff  produces  a  note  for  the  sum  of  eight  hundred 
livres  in  money  due  by  the  defendant  and  which  has  matured,  and 
prays  that  the  said  defendant  be  condemned  to  pay  to  him  the 
amount  thereof. 

Heard  also  the  defendant,  who  acknowledged  his  said  note, 
but  says  that  it  was  agreed  verbally  with  M.  Levy,  at  the  time  that 
the  latter  made  him  these  advances,  to  take  some  notes  of  the 
inhabitants  in  payment;  and  that  this  is  his  agreement,  without 
which  he  would  have  taken  nothing  at  M.  Levy's. 

M.  Levy  made  rejoinder  and  said  that  there  was  no  agreement 
of  that  kind  and  persisted  that  the  defendant  should  be  con- 
demned to  pay  him  the  said  sum  without  delay,  since  he  did  not 
intend  to  take  bons  ^  of  the  inhabitants  in  payment. 

The  said  Charles  LaCroix  maintained  that  the  said  M.  Levy 
made  a  verbal  agreement  to  take  the  said  bons  of  the  inhabitants 
and  it  was  his  convention. 

Neither  party  has  been  able  to  give  any  proof  and  since  the  note 
makes  no  mention  of  this  agreement,  after  the  parties  were  heard 
and  all  considered  and  examined,  the  Court  decreed  and  does 
decree  that  there  shall  be  given  Charles  LaCroix  a  month's  credit 
to  procure  from  the  inhabitants  what  is  due  him  either  in  cash  or 
commodities  at  the  price  current,  which  payments  in  the  same 
kind  shall  be  delivered  to  the  said  M.  Levy,  who  shall  not  be 

transactions  of  the  inhabitants.  The  form  of  a  bon  was  as  follows:  "Bon  pour  six  livre  de 
Barbue  a  St.  Louis  ce  25  ybre,  1799.  Antoine  Roy." — Address  by  Judge  W.  C.Carr  at  St. 
Louis,  February  15,  1747  • 


220  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

aud*  S^  Levy  par  led*  LaCroix  En  meme  nature  qui  ne  poura  les 
refuser  jusqua  la  Concurance  de  Son  dub.  si  mieux  naime  led* 
S'"  Levy  de  sacommoder  des  Billets  quil  jugera  a  propos,  ou  avec 
les  personnes  qui  les  doivent  Et  condamnons  le  deffendeur  aux 
frais  que  nous  avons  liquidez  a  quinze  livres  lesd*  jour  Et  an. 
p^  Le  grefe  lo  J  B  H  LaCroix  prsdt 

p'"  Ihuissier  5  Labuxiere  grefier 

La  Cour  est  ajournde  au  i^'"  de  fevrier  mil  sept  cent  quatre 
vingt  six  Et  les  Extraordinaire  auront  lieux. 

a  une  Cour  du  quatorze  fevrier  mil  Sept  Cent  quatre  vingt  Six. 
M^^  Jean  B*^  LaCroix    Presidant 
fr.  courier  Charles  ducharme 

antoine  girardin  Philipe  angel 

B*«  Dubuque 
Jean  B*«  Baron  demandeur  contre  Louis  Lambert  deffendeur 
et  Joseph  vaudry  aussi  defendeur 
Le  demandeur  demande  a  la  Cour  quil  luy  soit  paye  la  Somme 
de  Soixante  livres  pour  deux  Communs  quil  a  fait  le  printems 
dernier  pour  les  dits  deux  deffendeurs  par  ordre  de  M''^  girar- 
din Et  Dubuque  magistrats  aux  Communs  De  la  prairie  de  ce 
village  les  dits  deffendeurs  ayant  refusd  de  la  faire  dans  le 
tems  fixe. 

ouy  les  deffendeurs  qui  ont  dit  quils  navoient  point  de  terre  a  la 
prairie  de  ce  village  Et  quils  avoient  fait  leur  commun  a  la  prairie 
du  pont  que  ces  Communs  apartenoient  a  des  personnes  du  village 
qui  nen  avoient  point  fait. 

Le  demandeur  a  replique  quil  les  avoit  faites  pour  les  defend- 
eurs  par  ordre  de  M""^  Dubuque  Et  girardin  Et  quil  luy  avoit 
promis  de  le  faire  payer,  ouy  M''^  Dubuque  magistrats  qui  est 
Convenu  du  fait.  Le  tout  considere  tout  considere  Nous  con- 
damnons les  dits  Lambert  et  vaudry  a  payer  Chacun  la  s^^  de  trente 
livres  aud*  jean  B*^  Baron  Et  ce  sans  delais  Et  aux  frais  Et  depens 
que  nous  avons  liquidez  a  la  Somme  de  vingt  Cinq  livres,  dont  dix 
livres  p^  Ihuissier  et  quinze  livres  pour  le  grefier  tant  p^  deux  ordres 
que  pour  la  presente  sentence  ce  qui  sera  Execute  lesd*  jour  Et  an 

^  Clerk's  note  in  the  margin. 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1786       221 

allowed  to  refuse  them  up  to  the  equivalent  of  his  due,  unless  the 
said  M.  Levy  prefers  to  accept  notes  which  he  shall  judge  good  or 
to  make  arrangements  with  the  persons  who  owe  them;  and 
we  condemn  the  defendant  to  the  costs  which  we  have  fixed 
at  fifteen  livres  the  said  day  and  year. 

For  the  record  office  10.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

For  the  huissier  5.^  Labuxiere,  Clerk. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  ist  of  February,  1786,  and  special 
sessions  shall  have  place. 

At  a  Court,  February  14,  1786. 

MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President.     Charles  DuCharme. 

Fr.  Courier.  Phillippe  Engel. 

Antoine  Girardin.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Jean  Bte.  Baron,  Plaintiff  vs.  Louis  Lambert,  Defendant,  and 
Joseph  Vaudry,  also  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  prays  the  Court  that  there  be  paid  him  the  sum  of 
sixty  livres  for  two  fences  on  the  common  field  ^  which  he  made 
last  spring  for  the  said  two  defendants  by  order  of  MM.  Girardin 
and  Dubuque,  magistrates  for  the  fences  of  the  meadows  of  this 
village,  since  the  said  defendants  had  refused  to  make  it  in  the 
fixed  time. 

Heard  the  defendants  who  said  that  they  had  no  land  in  the 
meadow  of  this  village  and  that  they  had  made  their  fence  in  the 
Prairie  du  Pont  and  that  these  fences  in  the  common  field  belonged 
to  some  persons  of  the  village  who  had  not  made  them. 

The  plaintiff  replied  that  he  had  made  them  for  the  defendants 
by  order  of  MM.  Dubuque  and  Girardin  and  that  the  former 
had  promised  him  to  make  them  pay.  Heard  M.  Dubuque,  mag- 
istrate, who  has  admitted  the  fact.  All  considered  we  condemn 
the  said  Lambert  and  Vaudry  to  pay  each  the  sum^  of  thirty  livres 
to  the  said  Jean  Bte.  Baron  and  that  without  delay  and  to  pay  the 
costs  and  charges,  which  we  fix  at  the  sum  of  twenty-five  livres,  of 
which  ten  livres  are  for  the  huissier  and  fifteen  livres  for  the  clerk, 

2  This  probably  means  the  fence,  but  it  might  mean  any  other  structure  built  by  the 
community.  The  use  of  the  feminine  pronoun,  however,  would  point  to  the  idea  of  la 
cloture  being  in  the  clerk's  mind. 

3  A  common  abbreviation  for  somme. 


222  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

Sauf  leur  reur  [sic]  sur  ceux  quils  disent  navoir  point  fait  de 
Commun  tant  p'"  les  soixante  livres  que  p^  Les  frais. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pdt 

La  Cour  est  ajournee  le  deux  de  Mars  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt 
Six. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr  sd 

a  la  meme  Cour  du  14  fevrier  1786. 
La  veuve  Beaulieu  demanderesse  contre  antoine  Girardin 

deffendeur 

La  demanderesse  a  produit  une  requete  Portant  ce  qui  Suit. 

a  Messieurs  les  magistrats  et  president  tenant  la  Cour  du  dis- 
trict des  Cahos. 

Messieurs 

Madame  veuve  Beaulieu  a  I'honneur  de  vous  exposer  que 
depuis  lespace  de  vingt  trois  ans  ou  plus  elle  est  proprietaire  d'une 
Sucrerie  a  elle  conceddee  par  Messieurs  Les  missionnaires  dont 
elle  En  a  tous  les  titres  Et  depuis  quelques  mois,  Monsieur  Girar- 
din Setant  presente  a  votre  cour  pour  vous  la  demander  de  rechef 
vous  luy  avez  accorde  Sur  la  mauvaise  information  quil  vous  a 
faite.  Et  En  ayant  eu  connoissance  ainsy  que  plusieurs  Citoyens 
de  ce  village  En  jugeant  que  Ceci  ne  pouvoit  etre  que  prejudiciable, 
nous  avons  represents  au  Sieur  girardin  qu'il  ne  pouvoit  nous  oter, 
un  bien  qui  nous  apartenoit  si  legitimement  et  qu'il  auroit  grand 
tor  dy  faire  travailler  vu  que  cela  ne  pouvoit  luy  occasionner  que 
de  la  perte,  il  nous  a  resiste  En  nous  disant  que  nous  etions 
trop  ignorant  pour  juger  de  Ceci  Et  quil  connoissoit  mieux 
Lentendue  de  la  Seigneurie  qu'aucun  habitant  domicilie  de  ce 
village. 

Le  temps  Etant  venu  pour  travailler  a  nos  sucrerie  Nous  nous 
y  Sommes  transportes  Et  avons  trouve  le  Sieur  girardin,  qui  nous 
a  fait  deffences  dy  travailler  Et  meme  de  nous  y  presenter  Et 
sil  faloit  En  venir  aux  extremitez  quil  se  Battroit  Et  resteroit 
plustost  Sur  la  place  et  quil  N'avoit  aucune  reserve  a  faire  contre 
des  coquins. 

1  The  seigniory  of  the  mission 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1786       223 

both  for  the  two  orders  and  for  the  present  judgment,  for  which 
there  will  be  execution  the  said  day  and  year,  reserving  to  them 
recourse  against  those  who,  they  say,  have  not  made  the  fences, 
both  for  the  sixty  livres  and  for  the  costs. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

The  Court  adjourned  [to]  the  second  of  March,  1786. 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

At  the  same  Court,  February  14,  1786. 
The  Widow  Beaulieu,  Plaintiff  vs.  Antoine  Girardin, 
Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  produced  a  petition  containing  what  follows: 

To  MM.  the  Magistrates  and  President  holding  the  Court  of 
the  District  of  Cahokia. 
Gentlemen : 

Madame  Beaulieu,  widow,  has  the  honour  to  show  you 
that  for  the  space  of  twenty-three  years  or  more  she  has  been  pro- 
prietor of  a  sugar-farm  conceded  to  her  by  MM.  the  Missionaries 
from  whom  she  has  all  the  title  deeds  therefor;  and  that  some 
months  ago  when  M.  Girardin  presented  himself  at  your  Court 
to  demand  it  from  you  anew,  you  granted  it  to  him  upon  the 
misinformation  which  he  made  to  you;  and  that  I  and  also  several 
citizens  of  this  village,  having  had  knowledge  of  this  and  judging 
that  this  could  be  only  prejudicial,  we  have  shown  M.  Girar- 
din that  he  could  not  take  away  a  property  which  belonged  to  us 
so  legitimately  and  that  it  would  be  a  great  wrong  to  have  work 
done  upon  it,  seeing  that  it  eould  only  occasion  him  loss.  He 
resisted  us  saying  that  we  were  too  ignorant  to  judge  of  that  and 
that  he  knew  the  extent  of  the  seigniory  ^  better  than  any 
inhabitant  living  in  this  village. 

When  the  time  to  work  on  our  sugar-farm  came,  we  went 
thither  and  found  M.  Girardin,  who  forbade  us  to  work  or  even  to 
go  there,  and  said  that  if  it  was  necessary  to  come  to  extremities 
he  would  fight  and  would  prefer  to  be  killed  on  the  spot,  and  that 
he  had  no  reserve  to  make  in  dealing  with  rascals. 

This  report  having  been  made  to  us  we  concluded  to  make  our 
report  to  you;  but  M.  Girardin,  having  recognized  his  fault  as 


224  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

ce  raport  Nous  ayant  Et^  fait  Nous  avons  Conclud  de  vous 
en  faire  notre  Rapport,  mais  M^  girardin  ayant  connu  Sa  Faute 
plus  grande  que  de  Contume  est  venu  des  le  lendamain  trouver 
M^  trotier  pour  Se  Blanchir  Et  y  ayant  trouve  madame  Baulieu 
ainsy  que  plusieurs  Cy  toy  ens  qui  luy  exposerent  leurs  raisons, 
disant  que  Ion  N'etoit  pas  pour  se  detruire,  que  nous  En  passerions 
par  la  justice,  a  quoy  il  nous  a  dit  quil  ne  vouloit  pas  etre  juge 
par  aucuns  Citoyens  de  L'Endroit,  vu  quil  vous  manquoit 
deux  Choses  la  Siance  et  la  probite.  Et  nous  ne  pretendons  pas 
avoir  Etably  une  Cour  pour  la  detruire  et  pour  nous  faire  juger 
par  aucun  Etranger.  Tons  les  habitans  demanden  qu'il  Soit 
denanty  de  tout  ce  qui  luy  a  Ete  accorde  a  la  prairie  du  pain  de 
Sucre  parce  quil  est  dans  le  Gas  de  Nuire  a  tous  les  habitans, 
Nous  esperons  que  vous  nous  rendres  la  justice  que  nous  atendons 
de  vos  Bontez  aux  Kaos  le  7  fevrier  1786. 

signe= veuve  Baulieu  =  pierre  martin  une+  =  chatel  une+  = 
p^®.  cabassier  une+=ch  Lefevre= +Lafleur=L  trotier=J  B*® 
millot=  +  B*^  Baron  =  +lebrun=  +jean  marie  dorion=  +  Berge- 
ron = +lagrave=desayes=h.  B.  i.  biron=  +  gabriel  Baron  =  B*^ 
Saucier  =fr.  Lonval  =  p^^  Lafleur=Lonval  p'"  Louis  gau=francois 
Lapens^= +antoine  Boyer= +grosle=  +  marque  du  compte= 
+j  Lapensee=  +  clement  alary =fr.  granmont=M.  Saucier  = + 
gervais=  -1-Butaud=  +  Louis  pilet=  -fraphael  gagnez=  +gabriel 
teller  =  +vaudry=  +peltier=  +Bouvet=  +  Joseph  cecire=  +B*® 
Dumay=fr.  trotier  =  -|-charlelaCroix=alexis-|-tabault+  =  chatel. 

ouy  le  S^  girardin  en  Ses  deffences  qui  a  dit  que  la  cour  luy 
avoit  accorde  sa  Concession  sur  le  refus  quavoit  fait  madame 
baulieu  de  representer  Son  titre  a  la  Cour.  quil  avoit  Exploite 
La  terre  dont  est  question  pendant  trois  ans  sans  interuption  de 
qui  que  ce  soit  Et  y  avoit  fait  des  frais  et  depenses  quil  Croyoit 
que  sa  Concession  devoit  etre  valable,  Et  a  offert  de  remetre  la- 
dite  terre  a  la  dame  baulieu  Et  aux  habitans  en  luy  Remboursant 
les  frais  que  Ion  luy  a  laisse  faire  suivant  un  memoire  quil  a  pro- 
duit  montant  a  792^^  En  argent  faute  de  quoy  quil  demandoit 
a  Etre  maintenu  dans  Sa  concession. 

^A  reference  to  the  United  States'  court,  for  which  the  French  were  to  wait  until  17QO. 
The  Court  makes  a  similar  reference  to  the  expected  court  below. 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1786       225 

greater  than  usual,  came  the  next  day  to  find  M.  Trottier  to  clear 
himself,  and  having  found  there  Madame  Beaulieu  as  well  as  sev- 
eral other  citizens  who  set  forth  to  him  their  reasons  saying  that 
it  was  not  a  question  of  destroying  oneself,  that  we  would  submit 
to  justice;  upon  which  he  said  to  us  that  he  was  not  willing  to  be 
judged  by  any  of  the  citizen  of  this  place,  since  you  were  lacking 
in  two  things,  knowledge  and  probity.  And  we  do  not  pretend 
to  have  established  a  Court  to  overthrow  it  and  to  have  ourselves 
judged  by  any  outsider.^  All  the  citizens  pray  that  he  may  be 
deprived  of  all  that  which  has  been  granted  him  in  Sugar-Loaf 
Meadow,  because  he  is  in  position  to  injure  all  the  inhabitants. 
We  hope  you  will  render  to  us  the  justice  which  we  expect  from 
your  benevolence.     At  Cahokia,  February  7,  1786. 

Signed  Widow  Beaulieu;  Pierre  Martin  a  -f;  Chatel  a  4-; 
Pierre  Cabassier  a  +;  Ch  Lefevre;  +  Lafleur;  Louis  Trottier; 
J.  Bte.  Milot;  +  Bte.  Baron;  -h  Lebrun;  +  Jean  Marie  Dorion; 
-f-  Bergeron;  -f-  Lagrave;  Deshayes;  h.  B.  i.  Biron;  +  Gabriel 
Baron;  Bte.  Saucier;  Fr.  Lonval;  Pierre  Lafleur;  Lonval  for 
Louis  Gaud;  Frangois  Lapanc^;  +  Antoine  Boyer;  +  Grosl^; 
-f-  mark  of  Lecomte;  -f-  J.  Lapanc^;  +  Clement  Alarie;  Fr. 
Grandmont;  M.  Saucier;  -f  Gervais;  -f-  Buteau;  -|-  Louis  Pillet; 
-f  Raphael  Gagne;  +  Gabriel  Tellier;  +  Vaudry;  -f  Pelletier; 
-I-  Bouvet;  -f-  Joseph  Cesirre;  +  Bte.  Diunay;  Fr.  Trottier; 
4-  Charles  LaCroix;  Alexis  +  Tabeau;  -|-  Chatel. 

Heard  M.  Girardin  in  his  defense  and  he  said  that  the  Court 
had  granted  him  his  concession  on  the  refusal  of  Madame  Beaulieu 
to  exhibit  her  title-deed  to  the  Court;  that  he  had  farmed  the  land 
in  dispute  during  three  years  without  interruption  from  anyone 
and  had  incurred  costs  and  expenses  thereon;  and  that  he  be- 
lieved that  his  concession  should  he  held  valid;  and  he  offered 
to  deliver  the  said  land  to  Madame  Beaulieu  and  to  the  inhabi- 
tants, if  they  reimbursed  him  for  the  expenses,  which  they 
permitted  him  to  make,  and  which  amounted  to  792  livres  in 
money  according  to  a  memorandum  which  he  produced;  in 
default  of  which  he  demanded  that  he  be  maintained  in  his 
concession. 


226  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Le  tout  considere  la  Cour  a  apoint^  ladite  Requete  de  la  dame 
Beaulieu  ainsy  quil  suit. 

Veu  la  requete  presentee  a  la  Cour  et  les  raisons  alegu^es 
par  toutes  les  parties  Ensemble  un  titre  du  vicaire  ou  Cure  des 
Cahos,  par  lequel  il  donne  au  S^  Beaulieu  le  Canton  de  Bois  que 
ces  predecesseurs  Setoient  reservez  pour  faire  du  Sucre  date  du 
19.9^^^  1763.  produit  ce  jourdhuy  par  la  veuve  Baulieu,  Ensem- 
ble notre  concession  accordee  au  S^  girardin  En  datte  du  premier 
octobre  1783.  La  Cour  ne  pouvant  decider  Sur  la  validite  de 
Pun  ou  de  Lautre  titre  atendu  que  lorsque  nous  avons  donne  la- 
dite concession  au  S^  girardin,  il  a  lui  meme  le  jour  precedant 
averty  madame  Baulieu  de  Nous  representer  Ses  titres  Si  Elle 
En  avoit,  faute  de  quoy  quil  aloit  demander  Sa  concession  ce 
quelle  a  refuse  coustament  Et  na  voulu  les  produire  a  la  Cour: 
vu  led^  refus  Nous  avons  Cru,  devoir  accorder  ladite  Concession 
aud^  S^  girardin  dautant  quil  a  Exploite  ladite  terre  et  fait  des 
travaux  pendant  trois  ans  a  la  Connoissance  de  tous  Les  habitans 
des  Cahos  et  de  la  dame  beaulieu  Sans  opposition  ny  deffences 
des  personnes  cest  en  consequance  que  notre  opinion  netant  pas 
de  Casser  aucunne  des  dites  Concessions  Nous  renvoyons  cette 
decizion  au  gouvernement  que  nous  atendons  qui  Fera  droit  a 
qui  il  apartiendra  donne  aux  Cahos  la  Cour  Seante  le  quatorze 
fevrier  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt  Six  Signe  Sur  la  copie  de  la 
presente  sentence  Ecrite  au  bas  de  La  requete  Remise  a  la  dame 
Beaulieu. 

Dubuque  =  Philipe  Engel  =  duCharme=une+pour  marque  de 
Courier  tous  quatres  conseillers  magistrats  Et  j  B*^  LaCroix 
presidant  et  moy  grefier  sousign^. 

Labuxiere  grefier.  J.  B  H  LaCroix  pr.  Sidant 

delivre  i  copie  de  la  Sentence  a  la  veuve  Baulieu  delivre  i 
copie  de  la  requete  et  Sentence  au  s^  girardin. 

^  Note  in  the  margin  by  the  clerk. 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1786       227 

All  considered  the  Court  referred  the  said  petition  of  Madame 
Baulieu  as  follows: 

In  view  of  the  petition  presented  to  the  Court  and  the  pleadings 
by  all  parties,  and  also  of  a  deed  dated  November  19,  1763,  from 
the  vicar  or  cure  of  Cahokia,  by  the  terms  of  which  he  gave  to 
M.  Beaulieu  the  section  of  woods  which  his  predecessors  had 
reserved  for  making  sugar,  and  which  was  exhibited  this  day  by 
the  widow  Beaulieu;  and  also  of  our  concession  made  to  M.  Girar- 
din,  dated  October  i,  1783:  the  Court  not  being  able  to  decide  on 
the  validity  of  either  deed,  because,  when  we  gave  the  said  conces- 
sion to  M.  Girardin,  he  himself  notified  Madame  Beaulieu  on  the 
preceding  day  to  exhibit  to  us  her  deeds,  if  she  had  any,  in  default 
of  which  he  said  that  he  was  going  to  ask  for  his  concession,  and 
she  constantly  refused  and  did  not  wish  to  produce  the  deeds  in 
Court;  considering  the  said  refusal  we  believed  that  we  ought  to 
grant  the  said  concession  to  the  said  M.  Girardin,  inasmuch  as  he 
had  farmed  the  said  land  and  had  had  work  done  on  it  for  three 
years  with  the  knowledge  of  all  the  inhabitants  of  Cahokia  and  of 
Madame  Beaulieu  without  opposition  or  prohibition  by  anyone: 
therefore  it  is  our  opinion  that,  since  we  do  not  wish  to  annul 
either  of  the  said  concessions,  we  remit  this  decision  to  the  gov- 
ernment which  we  are  expecting,  and  which  will  render  justice  to 
whomsoever  it  belongs.  Given  at  Cahokia  at  the  session  of  the 
Court,  the  14th  of  February,  1786;  and  signed  on  the  copy  of  the 
present  judgment  which  is  written  beneath  the  petition  returned 
to  Madame  Beaulieu. 

Dubuque;  Philippe  Engel;  DuCharme;  a  -f  for  the  mark  of 
Courier,  all  four  councilors  and  magistrates  and  J.  Bte.  Lacroix. 
President,  and  I,  Clerk  signed  below. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  President. 

Delivered  one  copy  of  the  judgment  to  the  widow  Beaulieu. 
Delivered  one  copy  of  the  petition  and  judgment  to  M.  Girardin.^ 


228  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  2  Mars  1786. 
M"  jean  B*®  LaCroix,  presidant.        Charles  ducharme 
Philipe  Engel  Thorn  Bredy 

fr  Courier  j  B^®  Dubuque 

antoine  girardin 
accord^  quatre  concession  aux  cy  apr^s  Nommds  Savoir. 
a  jean  B*®  alary 
a  Charles  Wood 
a  Joseph  Lambert 
a  Joseph  LaCouture 
dont  les  originaux  sont  deposes  au  Rang  des  minutes  du  No- 
taria. 

a  la  meme  Cour  delivr^  un  ordre  a  Jacob  groot  ameriquain 
pour  se  faire  payer  des  habitans  du  grand  Ruisseau. 
La  Cour  est  ajourn^e  au  p^  davril  prochain. 
a  la  dite  Cour  Le  S^  Girardin  a  presente  une  requete  contre 
la  dame  baulieu  En  datte  du  28  f^^  dernier  tendant  a  la  decizion 
de  leur  contestation  p'"  la  terre  du  pain  de  sucre.     la  Cour  assem- 
bl^e  a  Confirme  Sa  sentence  du  14  f^^  dernier  Et  Renvoy  lexposan 
a  se  pourvoir  devant  le  gouvernement  que  nous  atendons  ainsy 
quil  a  Ete  Cy  devant  decide  par  notre  dite  Sentence  du  quatorze 
fevrier  dernier  La  Cour  tenante  led*  jour  deux  mars  1786. 
[Signed]         B  Dubq.  Brady 

Phillipe  Engel         DuCharme 
de 


marque +  f^ 
Courier 


J  B  H  LaCroix  presdt 


a  une  Cour  du  trois  avril  mil  sept  Cent  quatre  vingt  Six  tenue  par 
M^^  jean  B*^  LaCroix  presd*      Charles  ducharme 
antoine  girardin  Philipe  Engel 

jean  B*^  dubuque 
Le  S^  jean  B*^  LaCroix  a  rendu  compte  ce  dit  jour  devant  la 
Cour  de  la  sucession  de  Michel  Godiniere  En  presence  de  Louis 

1  The  decision  was  not  final.     On  March  31,  Girardin  petitioned  the  Court  again,  and 
his  concession  was  sustained. — Chi.  Hist.  Soc,  Cah.  Rec. 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1786  229 

At  a  Court,  March  2,  1786. 
MM.  Jean  Bte  LaCroix,  President.       Charles  DuCharme. 
Antoine  Girardin.  Thorn.  Brady, 

Fr.  Courier.  J.  Bte  Dubuque, 

Philippe  Engel. 
Granted  four  concessions  to  the  hereinafter  named,  to  wit: 
to  Jean  Bte.  Alarie. 
to  Charles  Wood 
to  Joseph  Lambert, 
to  Joseph  Lacouture. 

The  originals  of  these  are  deposited  in  the  files  of  the  minutes 
of  the  notary's  office. 

At  the  same  Court:  delivered  an  order  to  Jacob  Groot,  Ameri- 
can, to  compell  payment  by  some  inhabitants  of  Grand  Ruisseau. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  the  first  of  April  next. 
At  the  said  Court  M.  Girardin  presented  a  petition  against 
Madame  Beaulieu,  dated  the  28th  of  February  last,  pleading  for 
the  decision  of  their  litigation  over  the  land  of  the  Sugar-Loaf. 
The  Court  in  assembly  confirmed  its  judgment  of  the  14th  of 
February  last  and  dismissed  the  petitioner  to  sue  before  the 
government  which  we  are  expecting,  as  has   been  herebefore 
decided  by  our  said  judgment  of  the  14th  of   February  last.^ 
In  the  session  of  the  Court  the  said  second  of  March,  1786. 
[Signed] 

B.  Dubuque  Philippe  Engel 

Brady  DuCharme 

Mark  of 

+ 
Fr.  Courier  J.  B.  H.  Lacroix,  Pres. 

At  a  Court,  April  3,  1786,  held  by 
MM.  Jean  Bte.  Lacroix,  President.     Charles  Ducharme. 
Antoine  Girardin.         •  Philippe  Engel. 

Jean  Bte.  Dubuque. 
M.    Jean    Bte.    Lacroix,    this    said    day,    rendered    before 
the   Court  account  of  the  estate  of  Michel   Godiniere  in  the 
presence  of  Louis  Chatel  according  to  the  receipt  which  the 


230  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Chatel  suivant  la  quittance  que  led*  Chatel  en  a  donnd  ce  susdit 
jour  aud*  s^  LaCroix. 

a  La  meme  jour  a  Ete  accord^  au  s^  jean  dumoulin  une  saisie 
privilegiere  sur  toutes  les  pelterie  et  autres  Efifets  Et  maison 
provenants  du  produit  des  marchandises  quil  a  avance  a  deffunt 
B*^  Leduc.  ladite  saisie  adressee  au  S'^  Mailhet  command* 
dans  la  riviere  des  ilinois. 

a  La  meme  cour  Jacob  groot  habitant  ameriquain  a  presents 
un  billet  contre  jean  solivan  par  lequel  il  reclame  trente  minot  de 
mahis  ou  quil  ait  a  luy  payer  le  prix  quil  vaut  aujourdhuy. 

oui  led*  solivan  qui  a  reconnu  devoir  les  trente  minot  de  mahis 
mais  quil  etoit  hor  detat  de  pouvoir  les  livrer  quant  a  present. 

Le  tout  considere  a  decide  que  Ledit  solivant  payera  aud* 
groot  dans  le  Cour  doctobre  prochain  Le  mahis  a  raison  de  Sept 
livres  dix  sols  les  minot  En  Egard  au  temps  present  de  sa  valeur 
actuelle  montant  a  la  somme  de  deux  cent  vingt  Cinq  livres  Et 
que  le  payement  sera  fait  soit  En  argent,  Lard,  farine  ou  mahis 
ou  bled  froment  au  Cour  du  prix  du  mois  doctobre  Et  non  En 
dautre  danrees  de  laquelle  somme  a  faute  de  payement  dan^ 
led*  temps  les  effets  dud*  solivant  seront  vendus  Et  condamnons 
led*  debiteur  aux  depens. 

J  B  H  LaCroix  pr.  Sdt 

La  Cour  est  ajourne  au  premier  de  May  1786. 

J  B  H  LaCroix  p.  S. 

1  Jean  Dumoulin  was  a  native  of  Switzerland.  According  to  Reynolds  (Pioneer  History, 
173),  he  was  a  man  of  good  education  and  gentlemanly  bearing.  He  must  have  settled  at 
Cahokia  about  this  time,  although  his  name  does  not  appear  as  a  resident  in  the  census  of  1787. 
See  post  p.  624.  In  1790  he  was  appointed  a  justice  of  the  Court  of  Common  Pleas,  and  from 
that  time  on  he  held  many  important  posidons.  Like  many  others,  he  became  wealthy  by  pur- 
chasing from  the  French  their  claims  to  land  granted  by  Congress  in  various  acts  to  the  inhabi- 
tants of  Illinois.  Since  the  United  States  was  dilatory  in  settling  these  claims,  the  poorer 
Frenchmen  were  compelled  to  part  with  their  rights  for  a  song.  Dumoulin  died  in  1808. 
— Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii.,   165. 

2  It  is  difficult  to  say  anything  about  this  man,  since  so  much  that  is  inconsistent  and  false 
has  been  written.  In  the  Record,  his  name  is  written  Mailhet;  Reynolds  calls  him  Paulette 
Alaillet;  in  Anier.  State  Papers,  Public  Lands,  his  name  is  given  as  Jean  Bte.  Maillet;  and 
Tasse  is  sure  that  his  name  was  Jean  Bte.  Mallet.  This  last  must  be  wrong,  since  Colonel 
Sargent,  secretary  of  Governor  St.  Clair,  writes  it  J.  Bte.  Mayet,  evidently  a  phonetic  spelling. 
— Smith  St.  Clair  Papers,  167.  The  following  is  possibly  true.  About  1778  he  settled 
without  authorization  on  the  site  of  the  present  city  of  Peoria  and  soon  became  the  prominent 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1786  231 

said  Chatel  gave  therefor  to  the  said  M.  LaCroix  this  day 
aforesaid. 

On  the  same  day  was  granted  to  M.  Jean  Dumoulin^  a  writ 
of  privileged  seizure  of  all  the  peltries,  other  effects  and  house, 
accruing  from  the  proceeds  of  the  merchandise,  which  he  ad- 
vanced to  the  deceased  Bte.  Leduc.  The  said  writ  of  seizure 
was  addressed  to  M.  Mailhet,  commandant  on  the  Illinois  river.^ 

At  the  same  Court  Jacob  Groot,  American  inhabitant,  pre- 
sented a  note  against  John  Sullivan  by  which  he  claims  either 
thirty  minots  of  corn  or  that  he  be  paid  the  price  that  it  is  worth 
to-day. 

Heard  the  said  Sullivan,  who  acknowledged  that  he  owed  the 
thirty  minots  of  corn;  but  said  that  he  could  not  deliver  it  at 
present. 

All  considered  the  Court  decided  that  the  said  Sullivan  shall 
pay  the  said  Groot,  in  the  course  of  October  next,  the  corn  at  the 
rate  of  seven  livres  ten  sols  the  minot,  which  is  at  the  present  time 
its  value  and  which  amounts  to  the  sum  of  two  hundred  and 
twenty-five  livres,  and  that  the  payment  shall  be  made  either  in 
money,  lard,  ^  flour,  corn  or  wheat  at  the  current  price  of  the 
month  of  October,  and  not  in  other  commodities.  In  default 
of  payment  of  this  sum  at  the  said  time  the  effects  of  the  said 
Sullivan  shall  be  sold;  and  we  condemn  the  said  debtor  to  pay 
the  costs. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  first  of  May,  1786. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

trader  there.  From  him  the  village  was  called  the  Ville  de  Maillet.  He  had  relations  with 
the  Cahokia  traders  and  the  magistrates  of  that  village  regarded  Peoria  as  being  a  dependency 
of  their  district  and  Mailhet  as  the  commandant  of  the  post.  See  pp.  389,  417.  In  Reynolds' 
time  the  tradition  was  preserved  that  he  led  a  successful  expedition  against  St.  Joseph  in  1778 
as  a  retaliation  on  the  British  for  their  defeat  of  the  Cahokia  expedition  of  the  previous  year. 
This  attack  by  the  Cahokians  occurred  in  1780  and  was  inspired  by  Colonel  de  la  Balme. 
If  the  tradition  in  regard  to  Mailhet  is  correct,  he  must  have  accompanied  the  Spanish  and 
Cahokia  expedition  against  the  British  post  at  the  beginning  of  the  next  year.  See  Introduc- 
tion, p.  xcii.  Mailhet  appears  to  have  extended  his  trading  ventures  as  far  as  the  Rocky 
Mountains.  He  was  killed  in  1801. — Reynolds,  Pioneer  History,  97;  Tass6,  Les  Canadiens 
de  I'ouest,  i,  241  et  seq.;  Amer.  State  Papers,  Public  Lands,  iii.,  478. 


232  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  tenue  extraordinairement  Le   15   avril   1786. 
M^^  jean  B*®  LaCroix,  Presidant     francois  Courier 
jean  B^^  Dubuque  Charles  ducharme 

Entre  Francois  Cailhole   commerceant  de  la  rive  espagnole 
demandeur  Centre  M""  Jean  Dumoulin  Negte  aux  Cahos 

deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  requiere  que  le  s^  dumoulin  soit  condamn^ 
a  luy  livrer  vingt  cinq  sacs  de  Mahis. 

Led^  dumoulin  dit  pour  defifence  quil  lui  a  par  compte  et 
Convention  promis  une  genisse  quil  offroit  de  luy  donner  Son 
mahis  En  luy  Remetant  ladite  genisse  Et  quil  luy  en  a  deja  remis 
deux  minots. 

parties  ouies  en  leur  demandes  reponses,  repliques  Et  Con- 
tredits  La  Cour  ordonne  que  M^  demoulin  Remetra  au  s^  Cailhole 
treize  minots  de  Mahis  a  quoy  faire  il  sera  Contraint  Sans  delais 
Et  condamnons  Led^  S^  dumoulin  aux  depens  Et  frais. 

a  la  meme  cour  le  S^  dumoulin  a  produit  un  compte  de  la  s® 
de  Cent  livres  p'"  le  salaire  dun  de  Ses  hommes  que  le  s^  Cailhole 
a  Engage. 

ouy  le  S^  Cailhole  qui  a  repondu  que  led^  Engage  Navoit  tra- 
vaille  que  huit  jours  quaubout  desquels  il  lavoit  quitte  a  raison  de 
quarante  livres  par  mois  quil  offroit  de  luy  payer  les  dits  huit  jours 
Sur  le  pieds  des  quarante  livres  sur  quoy  parties  ouyes  Condam- 
nons le  s^  Cailhole  a  payer  les  huit  journees  sur  le  pieds  Convenu 
Entreux  de  quarante  livres  par  mois  Et  aux  frais  Et  depens. 
La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  p'"^  de  may  1786. 

J  B  H  LaCroix  prs.dt 
a  une  Cour  du  premier  May  1786. 
M'"^  jean  B^^  LaCroix  presidant       Philipe  angel 

antoine  girardin  .  jean  B*^  dubuque 

Charles  ducharme  francois  Courier 

entre  la  veuve  george  Blain  demanderesse  contre  Louis  Le- 
COMPTE  defendeur. 
La  demanderesse  dit  que  le  deffendeur  luy  a  Brule  un  arpent 

1  The  reason  for  the  amount  is  not  clear.  Was  the  price  of  the  heifer  deducted?  Or 
were  twenty-five  sacks  equal  to  thirteen  minots?  The  only  reference  to  the  capacity  of  a  sack 
makes  it  contain  two  minots.     See  p.  205. 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1786  233 

At  a  Court  in  special  session,  held  April  15,  1786. 
MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President.      Francois  Courier. 
Jean  Bte.  Dubuque.  Charles  DuCharme. 

Francois  Caillot,  trader  of  the  Spanish  bank,  Defendant, 
vs.M.  Jean  Dumoulin  merchant  at  Cahokia,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  asks  that  M.  Dumoulin  be  condemned  to  deliver 
to  him  twenty-five  sacks  of  corn. 

The  said  Dumoulin  says  in  defence  that  the  plaintiff  by  account 
and  ^reement  promised  him  a  heifer,  and  that  he  offered  to  give 
him  his  corn,  if  he  delivered  the  said  heifer,  and  that  he  (the 
defendant)  has  already  delivered  two  minots  of  it. 

After  the  parties  were  heard  in  their  prayers,  answers,  replies, 
and  rejoinders,  the  Court  decrees  that  M.  Dumoulin  shall  deliver 
to  M.  Caillot  thirteen  minots  of  corn  and  he  shall  be  constrained 
to  do  this  without  delay;  and.  we  condemn  the  said  Dumoulin  to 
pay  the  charges  and  costs. ^ 

At  the  same  Court  M.  Dumoulin  produced  an  account  for  the 
sum  of  one  hundred  livres  for  the  wages  of  one  of  his  men  whom 
M.  Caillot  engaged. 

Heard  M.  Caillot,  who  answered  that  the  said  employe  had 
worked  only  eight  days  at  the  rate  of  forty  livres  a  month  and  that 
at  the  end  of  that  time  he  had  left  him;  that  he  offered  to  pay 
him  on  the  scale  of  forty  livres.  The  parties  heard,  we  condemn  M. 
Caillot  to  pay  for  the  eight  days'  work  at  the  scale  of  forty  livres 
a  month  agreed  between  them,  and  to  pay  the  costs  and  expense. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  the  first  of  May,  1786. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

At  a  Court,  May  i,  1786. 
MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President.      Philippe  Engel. 
Antoine  Girardin.  Jean  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Charles  DuCharme.  Francois  Courier. 

The  widow  George  Blin,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Louis  Lecomte, 
Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  says  that  the  defendant  burnt  an  arpenP  of 

"^  Arpent,  as  a  French- Canadian  linear  measure,  is  equivalent  to  i8o  feet. — Clapin,  Did. 
C  anadien-Fran  gais . 


334  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

de  Closture  En  perches,   quelle  requiere  quil  ait  a  luy  remetre  la 
meme  quantite  de  perche. 

Le  deffendeur  dit  quil  a  voulii  entrer  En  arrangement  avec 
la  demanderesse  et  quelle  na  voulu  entendre  a  aucun  accommode- 
ment.  Nous  avons  condamn^  Le  S^  Le  comte  a  livrer  la  meme 
quantite  de  perche  quil  a  brule  Recevable  Et  la  demanderesse 
fera  faire  sa  Closture  a  Ses  frais  et  condamnons  les  parties  a  payer 
chacun  la  moitie  des  frais. 

Entre  Henry  Biron  demandeur  contre  Michel  Charter 
deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  reclame  une  sie  de  long  quil  dit  avoir  prete  au 
Nomme  Charpentier  Et  que  ce  dernier  partant  pour  la  Nouvelle 
Orleans  luy  dit  quil  avoit  laisse  la  sie  au  S^  Chartier  quil  navoit 
qu'a  la  luy  demander  quil  la  luy  remetroit  ou  quil  la  luy  payeroit 
que  luy  demandeur  la  demandee  aud*  Chartier  dans  le  tems 
et  quil  luy  dit  quil  ne  la  perdroit  pas  et  quil  lavoit  que  ces  jours 
passe  il  a  demande  de  Nouvau  la  sie  aud*  Chartier  quil  luy  a 
repondu  quil  setoit  mal  arang^. 

ouy  led^  Chartier  qui  a  dit  quil  navoit  aucune  connoissance 
que  le  s^  Biron  luy  En  ait  parl6  quil  ne  sen  souvient  pas  Et  quil 
a  paye  la  sie  aud*  Charpentier  Et  quil  ne  pouvoit  pas  la  payer 
deux  fois. 

La  Cour  leur  ayant  propose  sil  acceptoit  le  sermant  lun  de 
lautre  led*  chartier  a  deffere  le  Sermant  au  s^  Biron.  sur  quoy 
luy  ayant  fait  faire  serment  sur  les  Saints  Evangiles  a  dit  et 
declare  quil  a  averty  led*  Chartier  au  depart  dud*  Charpentier 
Et  quil  a  promis  de  luy  payer  la  sie.  sur  quoy  Condamnons 
led*  Chartier  a  la  payer  a  demandeur  la  somme  de  quatre  vingt 
livres  En  argent  et  aux  frais  qui  seront  avances  par  le  s'"  Biron 
Et  a  luy  rembourcds  par  led*  Chartier.  Et  a  led*  Biron  donn^  un 
mois  de  Credy  au  deffendeur. 

J  B  H  LaCroix  prstd 

La  Cour  est  ajourn^e  au  premier  juin  1786. 
Labuxiere  grefir. 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1786  235 

rail  fence  and  prays  that  he  be  compelled  to  deliver  the  same 
quantity  of  rails  to  her. 

The  defendant  says  that  he  wished  to  make  an  arrangement 
with  the  plaintiff  and  that  she  was  unwilling  to  listen  to  any 
settlement.  We  condemned  M.  Lecomte  to  deliver  the  same 
quantity  of  acceptable  rails  that  he  burnt,  and  the  plaintiff  shall 
have  her  fence  made  at  her  own  expense;  and  we  condemn  the 
parties  each  to  pay  half  of  the  costs. 

Henry  Biron,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Michel  Chartier,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  claims  a  whip-saw  which  he  says  he  lent  the 
named  Charpentier,  and  that  the  latter,  when  he  set  out  for  New 
Orleans,  said  to  him  that  he  had  left  the  saw  at  M.  Chartier's 
and  that  the  plaintiff  had  only  to  ask  the  latter  for  it  and  he 
would  return  it  or  that  he  would  pay  him  for  it.  The  plaintiff 
says  that  he  demanded  it  of  the  said  Chartier  at  the  time,  and 
that  the  latter  said  to  him  that  he  would  not  lose  it,  that  he  had 
it;  that  a  few  days  ago  he  asked  for  the  saw  again  from  the 
said  Chartier  and  that  the  latter  answered  that  he  had  made  no 
clear  bargain. 

Heard  the  said  Chartier,  who  said  that  he  had  no  other  knowl- 
edge than  that  M.  Biron  had  spoken  to  him  about  it  and  that  he 
did  not  remember  about  it;  and  that  he  paid  the  said  Charpen- 
tier for  the  saw,  and  that  he  could  not  pay  for  it  a  second  time. 

The  Court  having  asked  them  if  one  would  accept  the  other's 
oath,  the  said  Chartier  tendered  the  oath  to  M.  Biron.  There- 
upon having  caused  the  latter  to  make  oath  on  the  Holy  Gospels,  he 
,  said  and  declared  that  he  notified  the  said  Chartier  on  the  depart- 
ure of  the  said  Charpentier  and  that  the  latter  promised  to  pay  him 
for  the  saw.  Whereupon  we  condemn  the  said  Chartier  to  pay  to 
the  plaintiff  the  sum  of  eighty  livres  in  money,  and  to  pay  the 
costs,  which  shall  be  advanced  by  M.  Biron  and  reimbursed  to 
him  by  the  said  Chartier;  and  we  order  the  said  Biron  to  give  a 
month's  credit  to  the  defendant. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  first  of  June,  1786. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk. 


236  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  premier  juin  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  Six. 
M"  Jean  B^«  LaCroix  presidant.       Charles  ducharme 
ant''  Girardin.  f  Courier 

Magistrats 
Le  S^  IzAAC  Levy  demandeur  centre  antoine   harmand    dit 

SANS  EACON  absent  defaillant  faute  de  procureur  pour  luy. 

Le  dit  S^  Levy  presente  une  requete  par  laquelle  il  reclame 
la  Somme  de  quatorize  Cent  livres  suivant  lobligation  hypotequaire 
dud*  sans  facon  Echu  depuis  le  mois  de  Novembre  de  Lannde 
derniere  demandant  que  les  Choses  hypotequ^s  soient  vendues 
jusqua  parfaite  liquidation  ou  quil  soit  fait  une  Estimation  des 
biens  hypoteques  p'"  luy  etre  remis  En  payement.  consistant  En 
Sa  maison,  trois  vaches  dont  deux  avec  leur  vaux  Et  deux  chevaux. 
surquoy  vu  la  Creance  Legitimes  du  S^  Levy  Et  le  retard  du  s^ 
sans  facon  la  cour  a  ordonne  que  les  Choses  hypoteques  seront 
Estimes  par  arbitres  et  que  le  S^  Levy  les  prendra  En  payement 
au  prix  de  Lestimation  jusqua  parfaite  liquidation  interest  frais 
Et  depens  a  cet  Effet  avons  nomm^  henry  Biron,  B*^  Dumay 
Et  philipe  Gervais  arbitres  pour  estimer  Les  effets  hypotequez, 
lesquels  feront  leur  Estimation  ce  lundy  Cinq  de  ce  mois  p^  etre 
Executee.  Et  condamnons  led*  harmand  aux  depens  qui  seront 
avancez  par  led*  s'"  Levy  lesd*  jour  Et  an. 

J  B  H  LaCroix 
a  la  meme  Cour 
Le  S'"  IzAAC  Levy  demandeur  contre  alexis    thabault  def- 

fandeur. 

Le  demandeur  requiere  que  le  deffendeur  soit  Condamnd  a 
luy  payer  la  Somme  de  quatre  Cent  vingt  une  livres  En  argent 
par  Son  Compte  Courant  Et  aux  depens  Et  frais. 

ouy  le  deffendeur  qui  a  dit  quil  y  avoit  baucoup  darticle  quil 
ignoroit  sur  quoy  La  Cour  a  requis  que  le  S^  Levy  feroit  sermant 
Et  affirmeroit  son  compte  veritable  a  Linstant  ayant  leve  la 
main  droite  sur  les  Saints  Evangiles  a  jure  et  afirmd  que 
son  Compte  Etoit  sincere  Et  veritable,  le  tout  considere  la 
Cour  a  condamne  et  condamn^  led*  deffendeur  a  payer  Sans 
delais  a  demandeur  la  Somme  de  quatre  Cent  vingt  une  livres 


J 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1786  237 

At  a  Court  of  the  first  of  June,  1786. 
MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President       Charles  DuCharme. 
Ant.  Girardin  Fr.  Courier. 

Magistrates. 
M.  Isaac  Levy,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Antoine  Harmand  called  San- 

FAgON,  absent  and  without  an  attorney  to  represent  him. 
The  said  M.  Levy  presents  a  petition  by  which  he  claims  the 
sum  of  fourteen  hundred  livres  according  to  the  obligation  assured 
by  mortgage  of  the  said  Sansfafon,  due  since  the  month  of  Novem- 
ber of  last  year;  and  demands  that  the  things  mortgaged  be  sold 
up  to  the  perfect  liquidation,  or  that  there  be  made  an  appraise- 
ment of  the  mortgaged  property  to  be  delivered  to  him  in  pay- 
ment. These  consist  of  his  house,  three  cows,  two  of  which  have 
calves,  and  two  horses.  Whereupon  in  view  of  the  legitimate 
claim  of  M.  Levy  and  the  delay  of  M.  Sansfagon,  the  Court 
decreed  that  the  mortgaged  property  be  appraised  by  arbitrators, 
and  that  M.  Levy  shall  take  them  in  payment  at  the  price  of  the 
appraisement  up  to  full  liquidation  of  the  debt,  interest,  costs  and 
charges.  For  the  purpose  we  have  named  Henry  Biron,  Bte. 
Dumay  and  Philippe  Gervais  as  arbitrators  to  appraise  the  mort- 
gaged effects,  and  these  shall  make  their  appraisement  this 
Monday,  the  fifth  of  this  month,  in  order  that  there  may  be 
execution;  and  we  condemn  the  said  Harmand  to  pay  the 
costs,  which  shall  be  advanced  by  the  said  M.  Levy  this  said  day 
and  year. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 
At  the  same  Court.  • 
M.  Isaac  Levy,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Alexis  Tabeau,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  begs  that  the  defendant  be  condemned  to  pay 
him  the  sum  of  fom:  hundred  and  twenty-one  livres  in  money 
according  to  his  current   account,  and   to  pay  the   costs  and 
charges. 

Heard  the  defendant,  who  said  that  there  were  many  items 
which  he  didn't  know  about.  Whereupon  the  Court  required 
that  M.  Levy  should  make  oath  and  affirm  his  account  as  tnie. 
Now  having  raised  his  right  hand  he  swore  on  the  Holy  Gospels 


238  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS. 

En  argent  p'^  le  montant  dud*  Compte  Courant  et  aux  frais  et 
depens  qui  seront  avancds  par  le  s''  levy  Et  a  luy  Rembourcez 
par  le  defendeur. 

s'"  al  tabault  a  fait  son  billet  ce  dit  jour  accepts  p^  le  s^  Levy 
payable  En  Novembre  prochain. 

J  B  H  LaCroix 
a  la  meme  Cour. 
Michel  Charley  demandeur  contre  Etienne  ardouin 

deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  reclame  contre  le  deffendeur  la  S®  de  vingt 
livres  ou  un  minot  de  Bled  froment  prix  du  Cour  pour  la  be- 
dauderie. 

ouy  le  deffendeur  qui  a  alegue  quil  ne  payeroit  pas  par  ce 
quil  ny  avoit  pas  un  an  Et  un  jour  quil  avoit  une  maison  sur  quoy 
la  Cour  a  condamn^  led*  ardouin  a  payer  Sans  delais  aud*  Charly 
la  somme  de  vingt  livres  Et  aux  frais  Et  depens  qui  seront  avances 
par  led*  Charly,  les  vingts  livres  seront  payez  Sous  trois  mois  De 
ce  jour. 

J  B  H  LaCroix 
a  la  meme  Cour. 
le  S^  jean  B*«  Tusson  demandeur  contre  Le  S'"  Andre  Belle 
deffendeur  et  defaillant  apr^s  avoir  Ete  assigne. 

Le  demandeur  a  produit  un  Billet  a  ordre  Echu  a  luy  dub 
Et  pass^  a  Son  ordre  par  m'*  Clamorgan,  de  la  Somme  de  onze 
cent  livres  En  argent  payable  En  pelterie  sur  lequel  il  y  a  deux 
recO  montant  Ensemble  a  la  somme  de  Cent  soixante  huit  livres 
En  argent  partant  reste  sur  led*  billet  neuf  cent  trente  deux  livres, 
dub  par  led*  s^  Bayles.  concluant  le  demandeur  a  ce  que  ledit 

1  Note  in  margin  by  the  clerk. 

2  The  beadle  was  a  subordinate  church  official  and  was  paid,  judging  from  this  case  and 
a  similar  one  on  page  279,  by  fees  levied  on  each  inhabited  house. 

3  Jacques  Clamorgan  was  a  resident  of  St.  Louis  and  was,  as  long  as  he  lived,  conspic- 
uous for  his  enterprise,  if  not  always  praised  for  his  methods.  In  1788  he  appears  to  have 
fallen  into  financial  difficulties,  at  least,  his  creditors  claimed  that  he  left  the  country  for 
Louisville  without  paying  his  debts; — Dr.  Col.,  2M43  and  1N68.  According  to  the  same 
witnesses,  he  showed  a  dislike  to  the  Americans.  His  name  is  particularly  connected  vriih 
the  fur  trade,  in  which  his  boldness  and  enterprise  made  him  the  leader  of  his  time.  His 
was  the  leading  spuit  in  the  first  Missouri  Fur  Company,  which  was  organized  May  12, 
1794.  One  of  the  objects  of  this  company  was  to  explore  the  upper  Missouri.  To  assist 
in  carrying  out  this  purpose  the  king  promised  a  subsidy  of  $10,000  and  a  reward  of 
$3,000  to  the  first  person  to  reach  the  Pacific  Ocean.     Although  the  royal  promise   was   not 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1786  239 

and  affirmed  that  his  account  was  true  and  genuine.  All  con- 
sidered the  Court  has  condemned  and  does  condemn  the  said 
defendant  to  pay  without  delay  to  the  plaintiff  the  sum  of  four 
hundred  and  twenty-one  livres  in  money  according  to  the  amount 
of  the  said  current  account;  and  to  pay  the  costs  and  expenses 
which  shall  be  advanced  by  M.  Levy  and  reimbursed  to  him  by 
the  defendant. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

M.  Al.  Tabeau  made  his  note  this  said  day  which  was  ac- 
cepted by  M.  Levy  and  is  payable  November  next,^ 
At  the  same  Court. 

Michel  Charly,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Etienne  Hardouin,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  claims  from  the  defendant  the  sum  of  twenty 
livres  or  a  minot  of  wheat  at  the  current  price  for  the  beadlery.^ 

Heard  the  defendant,  who  pleaded  that  he  should  not  pay, 
because  he  had  not  had  his  house  a  year  and  a  day.  Whereupon 
the  Court  condemned  the  said  Hardouin  to  pay  without  delay 
to  the  said  Charly  the  sum  of  twenty  livres  and  to  pay 
the  costs  and  charges,  which  shall  be  advanced  by  the  said 
Charly.  The  twenty  livres  shall  be  paid  within  three  months 
from  this  day. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 
At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Jean  Bte.  Tusson,  Plaintiff,  vs.  M.  Andre  Bayles,  Defend- 
ant, and  not  appearing  after  being  summoned. 

The  plaintiff  produced  a  note  to  order,  due  him  and  matured, 
and  assigned  to  his  order  by  M.  Clamorgan,^  for  the  sum  of  eleven 
hundred  livres  in  money  payable  in  peltries,  on  which  there  are 
two  receipts  amounting  to  the  sum  of  one  hundred  and  sixty-eight 
livres  in  cash  and  leaving  a  balance  on  the  said  note  of  nine  hun- 
dred and  thirty- two  livres  due  by  the  said  M.  Bayles;  and  the 
plaintiff  concludes  that  the  said  M.  Bayles  should  be  condemned 
to  pay  him  without  delay  the  said  sum  of  nine  hundred  and  thirty- 
performed,  Glamorgan,  with  his  associates,  entered  upon  the  enterprise.  Later  Glamorgan 
petitioned  for  and  obtained  a  large  grant  of  land  £ls  a  compensation  for  his  losses. — Amer. 
State  Papers,  Pub.  Lands,  iii.,  303  et  seq.\  Houck,  Boundaries  of  the  Louisiana  Purchase,  59  et 
seq.  He  was  living  when  Louisiana  was  transferred  to  the  United  States  and  was  one  of 
the  first  judges  of  the  new  Gourt  of  Quarter  Sessions,  Dillon,  Annals  of  St.  Louis,  ii.,  9. 


240  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

s^  Bayle  soit  condamne  a  luy  payer  sans  delais  ladite  somme  de 
Neuf  cent  trente  deux  livres  avec  Les  interest  frais  et  depens. 
sur  quoy  le  deffendeur  nayant  point  parti  ny  procureur  pour  luy 
Et  apres  que  ladite  Cour  a  fait  apeler  par  Ihuissier  led*  S'"  Belle 
par  trois  Cris  differants  a  la  porte  de  Laudience  et  quil  na  point 
paru  ny  personne  pour  luy.  la  Cour  a  Condamne  Et  condamne  led* 
s^  Belle  a  payer  aud*  S^  tusson  ou  au  porteur  du  billet  la  somme 
de  Neuf  cent  trente  deux  livres  pour  restant  diceluy  suivant  les 
conditions  du  susdit  billet  avec  les  interest  frais  et  depens.  lesquels 
frais  seront  avances  par  le  s^  tusson  Et  a  luy  remboursez  par  le 
deffendeur  ce  qui  sera  execute  lesd*  jour  Et  an. 

J  B  H  LaCroix. 

La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  Six  de  ce  mois  p'"  proceder  a  une 
Nouvelle  Election  de  magistrats. 

Labuxiere  greff  J  B  H  LaCroix 

a  une  Cour  du  Six  juin  1786. 

Le  S''  jean  B*^  LaCroix  antoine  girardin  Louis  Chatel,  Louis 
trotier,  mathieu  saucier  Joseph  Lapensee,  Et  Clement  alary 
ayant  Ete  Nomme  par  la  Nouvelle  Election  sont  Comparus  Et 
apres  avoir  prete  sermant  de  fidelite  ainsy  que  celui  doffice  ont 
pris  leurs  place  En  leurs  qualit^z  du  Magistrats. 
a  la  meme  Cour 

F^  Courier  demandeur  contre  Le  S^  Billet  dit  Bausoleil 
deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  reclame  trois  cent  Cinquante  Cinq  livres 
contre  le  deffendeur  quil  luy  doit  p^  restant  du  payement  dune 
paire  de  Boeuf  quil  luy  a  vendu  Et  quil  devoit  luy  payer  comptant 
ce  quil  na  fait  jusqua  ce  jour  concluant  a  ce  quil  ait  a  le  payer 
sans  delais  et  aux  frais  Et  depens. 

le  deffendeur  a  reconnti  ladite  debte  Et  offre  de  payer. 

La  Cour  a  Condanne  le  deffendeur  a  payer  sous  huit  jours 
Et  aux  frais  qui  seront  avances  par  le  S^  Courier  Et  a  luy  rem- 
bourcer  par  le  deffendeur. 

a  la  meme  jour  B*®  durbois  a  presente  une  requete  expositive 
que  le  s''  harmand  luy  doit  neuf  minots  de  Bled  froment  p^  sa 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1786  241 

two  livres  with  interest,  costs  and  charges.  Whereupon,  since 
neither  the  defendant  nor  an  attorney  for  him  appeared  and  after 
the  said  Court  caused  the  said  M.  Bayles  to  be  called  by  the  huis- 
sier  by  three  different  shouts  at  the  door  of  the  audience  cham- 
ber and  he  did  not  appear  or  anyone  for  him,  the  Court  has 
condemned  and  does  condemn  the  said  M.  Bayles  to  pay  the 
said  M.  Tusson,  or  bearer  of  the  note,  the  sum  of  nine  hundred 
and  thirty-two  livres  for  the  balance  of  it  according  to  the  con- 
ditions of  the  note  aforesaid  with  the  interest,  costs  and  expenses; 
which  costs  shall  be  advanced  by  M.  Tusson  and  reimbursed  to 
him  by  the  defendant,  for  which  there  will  be  execution  this  said 
day  and  year. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  sixth  of  this  month  to  proceed 
to  a  new  election  of  magistrates. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

At  a  Court,  June  6,  1786. 

The  MM.  Jean  Bte.  Lacroix,  Antoine  Girardin,  Louis  Chatel, 
Louis  Trottier,  Matthieu  Saucier,  Joseph  Lapanc^  and  Clement 
Alarie,  having  been  named  by  the  new  election,  appeared,  and 
after  taking  oath  of  fidelity  and  also  that  of  office,  took  their 
places  as  magistrates. 

At  the  same  Court. 
Fr.  Courier,  Plaintiff,  vs.  M.  Billet  called  Beausoleil,  De- 
fendant. 

The  plaintiff  claims  three  hundred  and  fifty-five  livres  from 
the  defendant,  which  he  owes  him  for  the  balance  of  the  payment 
for  a  yoke  of  oxen  which  the  plaintiff  sold  him,  and  for  which 
the  latter  ought  to  pay  cash,  which  he  has  not  done  up  to  the 
present  day;  and  concludes  that  the  defendant  should  pay  him 
without  delay  and  also  the  costs  and  expenses. 

The  defendant  acknowledged  the  said  debt  and  offers  to  pay. 

The  Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay  within  a  week 
and  also  the  costs  which  shall  be  advanced  by  M.  Courier  and 
reimbursed  to  him  by  the  defendant. 

On  the  same  day.  Bte.  Dubois  presented  an  explanatory  peti- 


242  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

recolte  de  1784.  ce  qui  a  Et^  prouv^  par  la  declaration  du  S' 
Courier,  la  Cour  a  recti  led*  durbois  intervenant  dans  les  ventes 
des  Biens  dud*  harmand  p^  le  payement  des  Neuf  minots  de 
bled  Evaluez  a  20  lb  le  minot  la  s®  de  180^^  Et  condamnons  sans 
facon  aux  frais. 

La  Cour  est  ajournde  au  p^  juillet  1786. 
Labuxiere  grefier.  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr.  s.  d. 

a  la  meme  Cour  il  a  Ete  decide  que  v<i  la  demande  des 
Creanciers  du  s^  antoine  harmand  absent  pour  le  payement 
de  ce  quil  leur  doit  quinvantoire  Sera  fait  devant  un  magis- 
trats  de  tous  Les  Biens  meubles  Et  immeubles  dud*  harmand 
et  questimation  En  sera  faite  par  jean  B*^  dubuc,  charle  du- 
charme  ?Et  francois  Courier  p^  le  huit  de  ce  mois  a  huit  heures 
du  matin. 

J  B  H  LaCroix 

a  une  Cour  assemblee  le  12  juin  1786. 
M'"^  LaCroix  presidant  Clement  alary 

Mathieu  saucier  Joseph  Lapensee 

Louis  trotier 
Les  creanciers  dantoine  harmand  dit  Sans  facon  presentent 
une  requete  demandant  quen  vertu  de  linvantoire  quils  ont  fait 
faire  des  Biens  dud*  harmant  que  la  vente  des  dits  Biens  En  soit 
faite  le  plus  promptement  que  faire  se  poura  p^  en  Empecher  le 
deperissement  Et  quil  soit  donne  terme  sufisant  p^  que  lesd* 
effets  puissent  se  vendre  avantageusement  tant  p'"  Leurs  interest 
que  celuy  dud*  harmand. 

La  Cour  ordonne  que  la  vente  des  biens  dud*  harmand  quant 
aux  meubles  Se  Fera  le  lundy  dixneuf  du  Courant  et  quil  Sera 
donn^  Credy  jusques  et  compris  le  mois  doctobre  prochain  sous 
bonne  Et  Sure  caution  qui  Seront  recue  par  les  Creanciers  Et 
quand  au  regard  de  la  maison  et  ses  dependances  elle  Sera  Criee 
de  mois  en  mois  pendant  trois  mois  Consecutif  a  la  porte  de 
lEglise  jour  de  dimanche  Et  adjugee  a  la  troisieme  Cn6e  avec  le 
Credy  jusques  au  mois  davril  de  Lannee  prochaine  1787  Sous 

1  The  huissier  held  the  auction  each  Sunday  to  receive  bids,  but  only  on  the  last  Sunday 
was  the  property  sold. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1786  243 

tion,  in  which  he  says  that  M.  Harmand  owes  him  nine  minots  of 
wheat  from  his  harvest  of  1784,  which  was  proved  by  the  affidavit 
of  M.  Courier.  The  Court  admitted  the  said  Dubois  as  a  party  to 
the  sale  of  the  goods  of  the  said  Harmand  for  the  payment  of  nine 
minots  of  wheat,  valued  at  20  livres  the  minot,  amounting  to  the 
sum  of  180  livres  \  and  we  condemn  Sansfa^on  to  pay  the  costs. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  first  of  July,  1786. 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

At  the  same  Court  it  was  decided  that,  in  view  of  the  demand 
of  the  creditors  of  M.  Antoine  Harmand,  who  is  absent,  for  the 
payment  of  what  he  owes  them,  an  inventory  of  all  the  property, 
real  and  personal,  of  M.  Harmand  shall  be  made  before  a  magis- 
trate, and  the  appraisal  thereof  shall  be  made  by  Jean  Bte.  Du- 
buque, Charles  DuCharme  and  Francois  Courier  on  the  eighth 
of  this  month  at  eight  o'clock  in  the  morning. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 
At  a  Court  assembled  June  12,  1786. 
MM.  LaCroix,  President.  Clement  Alarie. 

Matthieu  Saucier.  Joseph  Lapanc^. 

Louis  Trottier. 

The  creditors  of  Antoine  Harmand  called  Sansfa^on  present 
a  petition  praying  that,  in  virtue  of  the  inventory  of  the  goods  of 
the  said  Harmand  which  they  have  had  made,  the  sale  of  the 
said  goods  be  held  as  promptly  as  possible  in  order  to  prevent 
them  perishing;  and  that  there  be  given  a  sufficient  time  in  order 
that  the  said  efifects  may  be  sold  to  the  advantage  as  well  of 
their  interests  as  of  those  of  the  said  Harmand. 

The  Court  decreed  that  the  sale  of  the  personal  property 
shall  take  place  Monday,  the  nineteenth  of  the  present  month; 
and  that  there  shall  be  given  credit  with  good  and  safe  surety, 
which  will  be  accepted  by  the  creditors,  up  to  and  including  the 
month  of  next  October;  and  that  the  sale  of  the  house  and  its 
appurtenances  shall  be  cried  month  by  month  during  three  consec- 
utive months  on  Sundays  at  the  door  of  the  church,  and  adjudged 
at  the  third  proclamation,^  and  credit  with  good  and  sufficient 
surety  will  be  given  till  the  month  of  April  of  the  next  year,  1787. 


244  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

bonne  Et  suffisante  Caution,  laquelle  maison  ne  Sera  vendue 
toutes  fois  que  au  Cas  que  les  meubles  ne  suffisent  pas  pour  payer 
Lesdits  Creanciers  et  les  affiches  posees  prealablement  afin  que 
personne  ne  lignore  donn^  par  la  Cour  lesd*  jour  et  an. 

Labuxiere  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

a  une  Cour  du  i*^^  juillet  1786 
M^  LaCroix  presidant  Joseph  Lapens^e 

girardin  Chatel 

conseiller  magistrats 
Michel  antaya  a  fait  sermant  de  fidelity  Et  En  meme  temp 
sermant  dofice  En  quality  de  Bailly. 

a  La  meme  Cour 
Jacques  Lardoise  demandeur  contre  Gabriel  Baron 
defifendeur 
Le  demandeur  Reclame  deux  cent  Cinquante  livres  en  argent 
pour  le  payement  dun  Cheval  quil  a  vendu  au  deffendeur  depuis 
Lauthomne  derniere  laquelle  somme  il  devoit  payer  au  s^  Cadien 
Et  quil  na  point  paye  Et  quil  a  paye  luy  meme  a  mad^  Cadien 
Et  aux  depens. 

ouy  le  deffendeur  qui  a  alegue  quil  offroit  de  luy  remetre  un 
Cheval  et  quil  n'avoit  pas  dautre  argent  pour  le  present  Et  quil 
Navoit  achete  le  Cheval  que  quarante  piastre  ce  qui  a  Et^  re- 
connu  par  le  demandeur. 

sur  quoy  la  Cour  ayant  murement  delibere  ordonne  que  le 
deffendeur  Rendra  au  demandeur  le  meme  Cheval  aux  condi- 
tions quil  ne  sera  point  extropid  Et  quil  naura  aucun  mal,  ou  quil 
le  payera  Les  quarante  piastres  prix  de  La  vente  Convenues  En- 
treux  condamnons  le  deffendeur  aux  frais  que  nous  avons  liquide 
a  quinze  livres.  ce  qui  sera  execute. 

La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  1^^  juillet  1786. 
Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr  S. 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1786  245 

But  the  house  shall  be  sold  only  in  case  the  personal  property  is 
not  sufficient  to  pay  the  said  creditors  and  placards  have  been 
posted  previously  so  that  no  one  is  ignorant  thereof.  Given  by 
the  Court  this  said  day  and  year.  • 

Labuxiere.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

At  a  Court,  July  i,  1786. 
MM.  LaCroix,  President.         Chatel. 
Girardin.  Joseph  Lapancd. 

Councilors  and  magistrates. 
Michel  Antaya  made  oath  of  fidelity  and  at  the  same  time 
that  of  office  as  bailiff. 

At  the  same  Court. 
Jacques  Lardoise,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Gabriel  Baron,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  claims  two  hundred  and  fifty  livres  in  money  for 
the  payment  of  a  horse  which  he  sold  the  defendant  last  autumn, 
which  sum  he  was  to  pay  M.  Cadien  and  has  not  paid;  the 
plaintiff  says  that  he  himself  paid  Madame  Cadien,  and  he  de- 
mands costs. 

Heard  the  defendant,  who  pleaded  that  he  offered  to  deliver 
a  horse  to  the  plaintiff  and  that  he  had  no  money  at  present; 
that  he  had  bought  the  horse  for  only  forty  piastres^  which  was 
acknowledged  by  the  plaintiff. 

Whereupon  the  Court  after  careful  deliberation  decrees  that 
the  defendant  shall  render  to  the  plaintiff  the  same  horse,  on 
condition  that  it  shall  not  be  maimed  or  sick  or  that  he  shall 
pay  for  it  the  forty  piastres,  the  price  of  the  sale  agreed  upon  be- 
tween them.  We  condemn  the  defendant  to  pay  the  costs,  which 
we  have  set  at  fifteen  livres,  for  which  there  will  be  execution. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  July  i,  1786. 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 


246  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  tenue  Extraordinairement  le  13  juillet  1786. 
M™  jean  B*^  LaCroix  presidant       Louis  Chatel 
ant^  girardin  Joseph  Lapensde 

magistrates 
Entre  Louis  marchand  demandeur  contre  Laurant  hame- 

LiN  defifendeur 
Le  demandeur  demande  au  deiOfendeur  Cinq  Chevaux  quil 
luy  retient  Et  deux  cent  trente  deux  livres  En  pelterie  par  son 
compte  quil  a  afirme  devant  La  Cour. 

Le  deffendeur  dit  quil  est  convenu  au  pe  de  luy  donner  quar- 
ante  pot  de  taffia  pour  un  Cheval.  mais  que  led*  marchand  na 
pas  voulu  les  prendre  Et  quil  luy  a  offert  un  Cheval. 

le  demandeur  replique  au  Contraire  que  le  deffendeur  luy  a 
refuse  les  quarante  pots  de  taffia  Et  quil  a  traite  des  Chevaux 
avec  Et  quant  au  compte  produit  par  le  demandeur  Le  deffend- 
eur dit  quil  n'en  a  point  de  Connoissance  sur  les  contestations 
cy  dessus  le  demandeur  a  produit  le  Nomme  laCouture  p^  temoins 
lequel  apres  sermant  par  luy  fait  devant  la  Cour  a  dit  quil  avoit 
connoissance  que  les  quarante  pots  de  tafia  navoit  pas  Ete  \ivt6 
par  led*  hamelin  aud*  marchand,  Et  quil  avoit  connoissance  qu'ne 
partie  du  memoire  produit  avoir  Ete  fourni  par  led*  marchand 
aud*  amelin  Et  quil  avoit  Connoissance  quil  avoit  recta  un  Cheval 
dont  il  S'Etoit  Servy  Ihiver  dernier. 

Le  demandeur  a  produit  Claude  paneton  segond  temoin 
lequel  apres  sermant  par  luy  fait  a  dit  quil  avoit  connoissance 
que  led*  marchand  Etoit  Engage  au  s^  duchenaud  p^  aler  de  la 
mauvaise  terre  aux  pe  p^  60^^  Et  que  led*  hamelin  la  Envoy 6 
Chercher  p^  aler  p^  luy  et  quil  a  fait  deux  voyage  p^  led*  hamelin. 
sur  quoy  la  Cour  ayant  murement  reflechi  a  renvoye  les 
parties  hors  de  Cour  Et  de  proces,  depens  compenses  cest  a  dire 
chacun  par  moitie  ce  qui  sera  execute  la  dite  Sentence  Rendue 
par  accord  Entre  les  parties. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr  Sd. 

^  Mauvaise  Terre  is  the  name  of  a  stream  in  Scott  and  Morgan  counties,  Illinois 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1786  247 

At  a  Court  sitting  in  special  session,  July  13,  1786. 
MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President.  Louis  Chatel. 
Ant.  Girardin.  Joseph  Lapance. 

Magistrates. 
Louis  Marchand,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Laurent  Hamelin,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  demands  of  the  defendant  five  horses  which  the 
latter  is  retaining  and  two  hundred  and  thirty-two  livres  in  pel- 
tries, according  to  his  account,  which  he  affirmed  before  the  Court. 

The  defendant  says  that  he  agreed  at  Peoria  to  give  him 
forty  jugs  of  tafia  for  a  horse;  but  that  the  said  Marchand  was 
unwilling  to  take  them  and  that  he  offered  him  a  horse. 

The  plaintiff  rejoins  that  the  defendant  refused  him  the  forty 
jugs  of  tafia  and  that  he  traded  horses  with  [him].  As  to  the 
account  produced  by  the  plaintiff,  the  defendant  says  that  he  had 
no  knowledge  about  the  contestations.  Hereupon  the  plaintiff 
brought  forward  the  named  Lacouture  for  a  witness,  who,  after 
he  had  taken  the  oath  before  the  Court,  said  that  he  knew  that 
the  forty  jugs  of  tafia  had  not  been  delivered  by  the  said  Hame- 
lin to  the  said  Marchand ;  and  that  he  knew  that  one  part  of  the 
bill  produced  had  been  furnished  by  the  said  Marchand  to  the 
said  Hamelin ;  and  that  he  knew  that  the  latter  had  received  a 
horse  which  he  had  used  last  winter. 

The  plaintiff  produced  Clau4e  Paneton  as  second  witness, 
who,  after  he  had  made  oath,  said  that  he  knew  that  the  said  Mar- 
chand was  pledged  to  M.  Duch'enaud  to  go  from  the  Mauvaise 
Terre^  to  Peoria  for  60  livres,  and  that  the  said  Hamelin  sum- 
moned Marchand  to  go  for  him,  and  that  the  former  made  two 
journeys  for  the  said  Hamelin. 

Whereupon  the  Court,  having  carefully  reflected,  non-suited 
the   parties,  and   the  costs  are   to   be  divided,  that  is  to  say, 
each   one   half,   for  which   there  will    be  execution.     The  said 
judgment  was  rendered  by  agreement  between  the  parties. 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 


248  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  premier  aoust  1786.     Siegeant 
M"  jean  B*®  LaCroix  Presidant        Louis  trotier 
antoine  Girardin  Mathieu  Saucier 

Louis  Chatel  Con^^  magistrats 

Entre  Louis  pillet  demandeur  contre  Clement  alary 
deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  reclame  un  Boeuf  a  luy  apartenant  qui  a  pass^ 
par  la  Closture  du  deffendeur  Et  a  Ete  Sempaler  Sur  les  pieux 
de  la  Closture  du  s'^  LaCroix  requerant  quil  luy  soit  rend(i 
un  Boeuf  de  la  meme  valeur  Et  condamner  le  deffendeur  aux 
depens. 

ouy  le  deffendeur  qui  a  dit  pour  deffences  que  Lon  ne  devoit 
pas  tuer  le  Boeuf  que  lon  devoit  atendre  son  retour  de  Chasse 
quil  Lauroit  Guery,  que  puisqu'on  lavoit  tu^  Et  vend^  la  viande 
il  demandoit  a  Etre  decharge  du  Boeuf  Et  condamner  sa  partie 
aux  frais. 

Vu  le  marche  consenty  par  led*  Clement  alary  avec  les  mar- 
guiliers  de  la  fabrique  de  cette  paroisse  par  lequel  led*  Clement 
alary  nest  oblige  qu'aux  reparations  du  dedans  de  la  maison  qui 
a  Ete  louee  pour  servir  de  presbitaire  Et  a  deffaud  par  les  mar- 
guiliers  de  Navoir  point  fait  reparer  les  Clostures  Nous  avons 
decide  que  la  fabrique  rendra  un  pareil  Boeuf  au  demandeur  ou 
En  payera  la  valeur  au  prix  destimation  et  les  marguiliers  se 
feront  rendre  compte  de  la  viande  ou  produit  dicelle  pour  En 
Compter  au  profit  de  L  Eglise  ce  qui  sera  execute  condamnons  la 
fabrique  aux  frais. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
JOSEPH  VAUDRY  demandeur  contre  Gabriel  Baron  deffendeur 
Le  Demandeur  a  presente  une  requete  par  laquelle  il  reclame 
sa  petite  fiUe  quil  a  mis  Entre  les  mains  du  deffendeur  disant 
quelle  netoit  pas  traitee  Selon  les  Convention  de  leur  marche  au 
Contraire  quelle  etoit  traitee  pis  quune  esclave  requerant  que 
led*  Baron  soit  Condamne  a  la  luy  remetre. 

ouy  le  deffendeur  qui  a  deni^  tout  ce  qui  est  porte  En  ladite 
requete  demandant  que  le  demandeur  soit  tenu  a  luy  foumir  des 
preuves.     sur  quoy  la  Cour  a  ordonne  que  led*  vaudry  founira 


COURT  RECORD,  AUGUST,  1786  249 

« 

At  a  session  of  Court,  August  i,  1786. 
MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President.      Louis  Trottier. 
Antoine  Girardin.  Matthieu  Saucier. 

Louis  Chatel.  Councilors  and  Magistrates. 

Louis  Pillet,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Clement  Alarie,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  claims  an  ox  belonging  to  him,  which  passed 
through  the  defendant's  fence  and  was  impaled  on  the  pickets  of 
M.  LaCroix's  fence,  and  prays  that  there  be  rendered  an  ox  of  the 
same  value  and  that  the  defendant  be  condemned  to  pay  the  costs. 

Heard  the  defendant,  who  said  in  defence  that  they  should 
not  have  killed  the  ox;  that  they  should  have  waited  his  return 
from  the  hunt  and  that  he  would  have  cured  it;  that,  since  they 
had  killed  it  and  sold  the  meat,  he  prayed  that  he  be  discharged 
from  payment  for  the  ox  and  that  his  opponent  be  condemned  to 
pay  the  costs. 

In  view  of  the  bargain  made  by  the  said  Clement  Alarie  with 
the  church- wardens  of  the  vestry-board  of  this  parish,  according 
to  the  terms  of  which  the  said  Clement  Alarie  was  only  bound  to 
repair  the  interior  of  the  house,  which  was  rented  to  serve  for  a 
parsonage,  and  of  the  fault  of  the  church-wardens  in  not  having 
had  the  fence  repaired,  we  have  decided  that  the  vestry-board  shall 
render  a  similar  ox  to  the  plaintiff,  or  shall  pay  the  value  thereof 
at  an  appraised  price;  and  that. the  church- wardens  shall  have  ren- 
dered to  them  an  account  of  the  meat  or  proceeds  therefrom,  in 
order  to  account  for  it  in  the  profits  of  the  church,  for  which  there 
will  be  execution.  We  condemn  the  vestry-board  to  pay  the  costs. 
At  the  same  Court. 
Joseph  Vaudry,  Plaintiff,  vs  Gabriel  Baron,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  presented  a  petition  by  which  he  reclaims  his  little 
daughter,  whom  he  placed  in  the  hands  of  the  defendant,  saying 
that  she  was  not  treated  according  to  the  terms  of  their  agreement; 
but  on  the  contrary  she  was  treated  worse  than  a  slave;  and  he 
prays  that  jthe  said  Baron  be  condemned  to  render  her  to  him. 

Heard  the  defendant,  who  denied  all  that  is  contained  in  the 
said  petition,  and  demands  that  the  plaintiff  be  held  to  furnish  him 
proofs.  .  Whereupon  the  Court  ordered  that  the  said  Vaudry  shall 


250  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

preuves  suffisantes.  et  a  linstant  led*^  vaudry  a  fait  assigner  par 
ordre  de  cette  Cour,  mathieu  saucier,  Et  antoine  Lamarche  pour 
temoins,  Et  a  linstant  le  S^  B*®  saucier  est  comparu  lequel  apres 
sermant  par  luy  fait  a  dit  seulement  quil  avoit  Entendu  jurer  apres 
lenfant  Et  la  gronder,  mais  quil  ne  lavoit  pas  vue  batre  qui 
est  tout  ce  quil  a  dit  savoir.  led^  lamarche  Nayant  point  parti 
par  absence  avons  renvoye  lafaire  a  plus  Emple  informa- 
tion devant  un  magistra  de  la  Cour  qui  fera  droit  a  qui  il 
apartiendra. 

La  Cour  est  adjourn^e  au  i^^  7^^®  1786. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr  Sd. 

a  la  Cour  de  ce  dit  jour  i^^  aoust  1786. 

En  continuant  la  Cause  ci  dessus  est  comparu  antoine  La- 
marche lequel  apres  sermant  par  luy  fait  sur  les  Saints  Evangilles 
a  dit  sur  les  demandes  a  luy  faites  par  la  Cour  quil  navoit  autre 
connoissance  si  non  quil  avoit  vu  foueter  la  petite  fille  mais  quil 
Croyoit  quelle  I'avoit  merite  et  tant  qu'aux  autres  motif  de  mauv- 
ais  traitements  defaud  dhabillements  ou  de  Nouriture  quil  nen 
avoit  pas  de  Connoissance.  sur  quoy  parties  ouyes  Le  tout  ex- 
amine la  Cour  a  ordonn^  Et  decide  que  le  s^  gabriel  Baron  Ren- 
dra  la  petite  fille  au  s^  vaudry  son  pere  avec  ses  petites  hardes  a 
son  usage.  Sans  aucune  repetition  de  la  part  dud*  s^  Baron 
Enver  led*  s^  vaudry  de  penssion  ny  Entretien  Condamnons  le 
s'"  vaudry  aux  frais  par  form.e  de  des  domagement  Enver  le  s'" 
macarty  ce  qui  sera  execute  lesd*  jour  Et  an. 

J   B   H   LaCroix  pr  Sidant. 

a  une  Cour  du  premier  Septembre  1786. 
M*"^  jean  B*^  LaCroix  presidant        Mathieu  Saucier 
antoine  Girardin  Joseph  Lapensee 

Entre  Louis  Laperche  demandeur  contre  Le  S^  Motard  def- 

fendeur 
Le  deffendeur  [sic]  expose  quil  luy  est  dub  par  le  s^  motar  la 
Somme  de  trois  cent  Cinquante  livres  En  pelterie  pour  ses  gages 

1  The  only  explanation  possible  for  this  decision  is  that  Gabriel  Baron  was  named  Gabriel 
McCarty  called  Baron  or  vice  versa,  unless  we  assume  that  the  clerk  made  a  slip.  I  know  no 
other  authority  for  the  coupling  of  the  two  names. 


COURT  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1786  251 

furnish  sufficient  proofs.  And  now  the  said  Vaudry  caused  to  be 
summoned  by  order  of  this  Court  Matthieu  Saucier  and  Antoine 
Lamarche  as  witnesses.  Now  appeared  M.  Bte.  Saucier,  who, 
after  making  oath,  only  said  that  he  had  heard  them  swear  at  the 
child  and  scold  her, 'but  that  he  had  not  seen  her  beaten;  and 
this  is  all  that  he  said  he  knew.  The  said  Lamarche  not  having 
appeared  on  account  of  absence,  we  continued  the  cause  for  fuller 
information  before  a  magistrate  of  the  Court,  who  will  render 
justice  to  whom  it  shall  belong. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  September  i,  1786. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

At  the  Court  of  this  said  day,  August  i,  1786. 

At  the  continuance  of  the  above  cause  there  appeared  Antoine 
Lamarche,  who,  after  making  oath  on  the  Holy  Gospels,  answered 
to  the  questions  made  him  by  the  Court  that  he  had  no  other 
knowledge  except  that  he  had  seen  the  little  girl  whipped,  but  said 
he  believed  that  she  deserved  it;  and  as  to  the  other  counts  of  bad 
treatment,  lack  of  clothing  and  nourishment,  he  said  that  he  had 
no  knowledge  thereof.  Whereupon,  after  the  parties  were  heard 
and  all  examined,  the  Court  decreed  and  decided  that  M.  Gabriel 
Baron  shall  render  the  little  girl  to  M.  Vaudry,  her  father,  with 
her  little  clothing  for  her  use,  without  the  right  of  any  action 
for  recovery  on  the  part  of  the  said  M.  Baron  against  the  said 
M.  Vaudry  for  board  and  maintenance.  We  condemn  M.  Vau- 
dry to  pay  the  costs  by  way  of  damages  to  M.  Macarty,^  for 
which  there  will  be  execution  this  said  day  and  year. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 
At  a  Court,  September  i,  1786. 
MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President.      Matthieu  Saucier. 
Antoine  Girardin.  Joseph  Lapancd. 

Louis  Laperche,  Plaintiff,  vs.  M.  Motard,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sets  forth  that  there  is  due  him  by  M.  Motard  the 
sum  of  three  hundred  and  fifty  livres  in  peltries  for  wages  for 
going  to  the  Republic  on  the  service  of  M.  Trudeau  according 
to  his  pledge  made  to  M.  Motard,  dated  August  3, 1785;  and  that 
he  had  not  been  able  to  go  thither  on  account  of  the  war  of  the 


252  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

daler  a  la  republique  p'"  le  service  du  s^  trudeaux  suivant  son 
Engagement  fait  au  s^  motar  En  datte  du  3.  aout  1785.  Et 
que  comme  nayant  pas  pu  fi  [sic]  Rendre  par  la  guerre  de  la  re- 
publique avec  les  Shaus  ce  qui  les  avoit  oblige  de  relacher  nayant 
point  de  vivre  p''  subsister  pendant  Ihiver  suivant  deux  CertiflS- 
cat  quil  a  produit. 

ouy  le  s^  motar  En  Ses  deffences  qui  a  dit  que  le  s'"  s*  jean 
devoit  hyverner  p^  atendre  le  S^  trudeaux  ou  aler  le  rejoindre  de 
Bonprintems  quil  lavoit  Engage  a  Ses  Conditions  mais  quil  na- 
voit  pas  voulu  atendre  quoy  quil  eu  des  marchandises  p''  vivres 
sujB&sament  Mais  que  de  Son  Chif  il  avoit  redescendu  Et  aban- 
donne  les  interest  du  S^  trudeau  ayant  produit  un  Certifficat  a  ce 
sujet  du  S''  Rivet. 

Veu  lengagement  dud*  S*  jean  les  deux  Certifficats  des  Nommes 
Rivet  Et  deschamp  le  tout  produit  par  le  demandeur.  Et  autre 
Certifficats  donne  par  led*  Rivet  aud*  deffendeur,  le  tout  examine ; 
la  Cour  a  Condamne  Et  condamne  le  s^  motard  a  payer  aud*  S* 
jean  la  moitie  de  Ses  gages  montant  a  cent  soixante  quinze  livres 
en  pelterie  Et  aux  depens  ce  qui  sera  execute  lesd*  jour  Et  an. 

La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  i^^  S^^^  1786. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr  Sdt. 

a  une  Cour  tenue  Extraordinairement  le  douze  Septembre  mil 
sept  cent  quatre  vingt  Six. 
M^^  jean  B*^  LaCroix  presidant  Clement  alary 

antoine  girardin  Joseph  Lapensee 

Louis  chatel  Louis  trotier 

Mathieu  saucier  magistrats 

Entre  M^  antoine  Reilhe   demandeur   contre  Le  S^  Samuel 
Todd   deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  a  presente  une  requete  expositive  que  le  S^ 
tood  la  fait  venir  icy  aux  cahos  pour  terminer  une  affaire  quil 
avoit  avec  M*^^  veuve  Caimps  par  arbitres  quen  Concequance  il 
a  Emmene  Ses  arbitres  comme  procureur  de  ladite  dame  veuve 
Camps,  que  led*  S'^  tood  Etant  aussi  arrive  avec  Ses  arbitres  lors 

1  The  name  looks  like  Kans,  but  it  may  be,  as  given,  Shaws.  The  Shawnees  were  on 
the  warpath  during  the  winter  1785- 1786. 

2  The  full  name  of  the  plaintiff  was  Louis  Laperche  called  St.  Jean. 


COURT  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1786  253 

Republic  with  the  Shawnees,^  which  obliged  them  to  give  up,  since 
they  did  not  have  provisions  for  subsistance  through  the  winter, 
according  to  two  certificates  which  he  produced. 

Heard  M.  Motard  in  his  defence,  who  said  that  M.  St.  Jean^ 
should  have  wintered  in  order  to  await  M.  Trudeau  or  to  go  and 
join  him  in  the  spring,  and  that  he  had  engaged  him  on  these 
conditions;  but  that  he  had  not  been  willing  to  wait,  although  he 
had  merchandise  for  sufficient  provisions;  but  that  of  his  own 
accord  he  had  redescended  and  abandoned  the  interests  of  M. 
Trudeau;  and  the  defendant  produced  two  certificates  of  M. 
Rivet  on  the  subject. 

Considering  the  agreement  of  the  said  St.  Jean,  the  two  certifi- 
cates of  the  named  Rivet  and  Deschamp,  all  produced  by  the 
plaintiff,  and  other  certificates  given  by  the  said  Rivet  to  the  said 
defendant,  after  all  were  examined,  the  Court  has  condemend 
and  does  condemn  M.  Motard  to  pay  to  the  said  St.  Jean  half  of 
his  wages,  amounting  to  one  hundred  and  seventy-five  livres  in 
peltries  and  to  pay  the  costs  for  which  there  will  be  execution  the 
said  day  and  year. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  October  i,  1786. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

At  a  Court  sitting  in  special  session,  September  12,  1786. 

MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President.       Clement  Alarie. 

Antoine  Girardin.  Joseph  Lapance 

Louis  Chatel.  Louis  Trottier. 

Matthieu  Saucier.  Magistrates. 

M.  Antoine  Reilhe,'  Plaintiff,  vs.  M.  Samuel  Todd,* 
Defendant. 
Plaintiff  presented  an  explanatory  petition,  in  which  he  says 
that  M.  Todd  made  him  come  here  to  Cahokia  to  terminate  by 
arbitrators  a  cause  which  M.  Todd  had  with  Madame  Camp, 
widow,  and  that  consequently  he  brought  his  arbitrators  as 
attorney  for  the  said  Madame  Camp,  widow;  and  that  the  said 
M.  Todd,  when  he    arrived  also  with  his  arbitrators  and  it  was 

3  Reihle  was  from  St.  Louis. 

*  Samuel  Todd  was  a  Canadian  merchant. 


254  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

quil  a  Et6  question  de  produire  ces  pieces  led*  S^  tood  a  refuse 
quil  demandoit  que  led*  tood  ait  a  les  produire  ou  quil  soit  deboute 
de  toutes  demandes  Enver  ledite  dame  Camps  Et  Condamnd 
aux  frais  Et  depens. 

ouy  le  S^  tood  qui  a  dit  quil  ataquoit  personnelement  led* 
S^  Reyn  Et  a  produit  a  la  Cour  un  billet  dub  par  le  S^  guillon  fils 
de  douze  Cent  Cinq  livres  de  Castor  pezant  Cautionne  par  deffunt 
Le  s^  Camp  En  datte  du  23  7^^^  1785  Sans  En  demander  le  paye- 
ment. 

Sur  quoy  la  Cour  luy  ayant  demande  Sil  vouloit  faire  decider 
lafaire  presentement  Sur  cette  Rive  ou  ailleur,  quil  Etoit  libre 
de  la  faire  decider  par  les  quatre  arbitres  quil  Etoit  convenu  avec 
M^  Reilh,  ou  des  jures. 

a  quoy  led*  S^  tood  a  repondu  quil  laissoit  laffaire  la,  quant  a 
present  Et  quil  la  fairoit  decider  dans  un  autre  temp  quil  Na- 
voit  affaire  qua  M^  Reilhe. 

Sur  quoy  le  S^  tood  Setant  conforme  a  lordre  de  La  Cour 
au  bas  de  la  requete  du  s^  Reilhe  En  datte  de  ce  jour  Et  a  la 
demande  du  s''  Reilhe,  la  Cour  Condamne  le  s^  Reilhe  En 
tous  les  frais  Et  depens  de  lextraordinaire  donne  aux  Cahos  la 
Cour  sente  [sic]  led*  jour  douze  Septembre  mil  Sept  cent  quatre 
vingt  six. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  prSdt. 

a  une  Cour  du  2  8^^^  1786. 
M""^  jean  B*^  LaCroix  presidant       Louis  Chatel 
antoine  girardin  Mathieu  saucier 

Louis  trotier  Clement  alary 

Conseillers 
Philips  Engel  demandeur  contre  M^  dorsey  Pentecoste 
represente  par  M^  jean  B*^  LaCroix  deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  demande  au  deffendeur  quil  soit  tenu  a  faire 
la  mitoyenne  En  pieux  de  Bout  des  terrains  Entre  led*  S^  Pente- 
coste Et  led*  S'^  angel  Le  S^  LaCroix  a  repondu  quil  offroit  de  faire 
ladite  mitoyenne  pour  vu  toutes  fois  que  la  Cour  lordonne  afin 
quil  luy  en  soit  tenu  Compte  par  led*  S^  Pentecoste.     sur  quoy 

2  For  Dorsey  Pentecoste,  see  p.  581. 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1786  255 

a  question  of  producing  these  documents,  refused;  and  he  prayed 
that  the  said  Todd  be  compelled  to  produce  them  or  that  he 
be  denied  all  his  prayers  against  the  said  Madame  Camps  and  be 
condemned  to  pay  the  costs  and  expenses. 

Heard  M.  Todd  who  said  that  he  brought  action  personally 
against  the  said  M.  Reilhe  and  produced  in  Court  a  note  due 
by  M.  Guillon  jr.  for  twelve  hundred  and  five  pounds  weight  of 
beaver  guaranteed  by  the  deceased  M.  Camp  under  date  of  Sept- 
ember 23,  1785,  without  demanding  the  payment  therefor. 

Whereupon  the  Court  asked  him  if  he  wished  to  have  the 
cause  decided  now  on  this  bank  or  elsewhere,  saying  that  he  was 
free  to  have  it  decided  by  the  four  arbitrators,  as  was  agreed  with 
M.  Reilhe,  or  by  jurors. 

To  which  the  said  M.  Todd  answered  that  he  would  abandon 
it  for  the  present  and  have  it  decided  at  another  time,  that  he  had 
only  an  affair  with  M.  Reilhe. 

Whereupon  M.  Todd  having  conformed  to  the  order  of  the 
Court  written  below  the  petition  of  M.  Reilhe,  under  date  of  this 
day  and  to  the  prayer  of  M.  Reilhe,  the  Court  condemned  M. 
Reilhe  to  pay  all  the  costs  and  charges  of  the  special  session. 
Given  at  Cahokia  at  the  session  of  the  Court  the  said  day,  the 
the  twelfth  day  of  September,  1786. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

At  a  Court,  October  2,  1786. 
MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President.        Louis  Chatel. 
Antoine  Girardin.  Matthieu  Saucier. 

Louis  Trottier.  Clement  Alarie. 

Councilors. 
Philippe  Engel,  Plaintiff,  vs  M.  Dorsey  Pentecoste,^  repre- 
sented by  M.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  demands  of  the  defendant  that  he  be  held  to  build 
the  party  fence  of  pointed  stakes  between  the  lands  of  the  said 
M.  Pentecoste  and  the  said  M.  Engel.  M.  LaCroix  answered 
that  he  offered  to  build  the  party  fence,  provided,  however,  that 
the  Court  command  it,  in  order  that  there  may  be  rendered  to 
him  account  thereof  by  the  said  M.  Pentecoste.    Whereupon  the 


256  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

la  Cour  ordonne  au  S^  LaCroix  de  faire  ladite  moyenne  En  pieux 
de  bout  bonne  Et  recevable  dont  il  se  fera  Rembourcer  par  led* 
S'"  pentecoste  condamnons  le  S^  LaCroix  aux  frais. 

at  Girardin 
La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  deux  de  Novembre  prochain. 
Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr  sdt. 

[A  blank  page  across  which  is  written] 
pass^  par  Erreur  et  par  inadertance  [sic]. 
a  une  cour  du  2.  9^^^  1786. 
IVF®  jean  B*«  LaCroix  presidant       Louis  trotier 
antoine  girardin  Louis  chatel 

Mat.  saucier  Clement  alary 

Joseph  Lapensee 
Le  Sr  izaac  Levy  demandeur  contre  jean  B*^  Baron 

deffendeur 
Le  S^  Levy  a  produit  un  compte  a  la  Charge  du  deffendeur 
de  la  Somme  de  trois  cent  soixante  livres  en  argent  p""  fourni- 
tures  faites  aud^  baron  Lequel  compte  le  deffendeur  na  pas  voulu 
aprouver  En  plusieurs  articles  et  demande  quil  soit  detaille 
depuis  le  commencement  jusqua  la  fin.  Sur  quoy  la  Cour  a 
ordonne  que  le  s^  Levy  fournira  au  deffendeur  son  compte  de- 
taille art.  par  art.  avec  les  dattes  Et  avoir  quil  aura  Recti  p'" 
etre  disente  ou  aprouve  par  le  deffendeur  Et  En  Etre  ordone 
devant  un  magistrat  de  la  Cour  a  quil  apartiendra  depens  reserve 
jusqua  la  deffinition  de  leurs  comptes. 

La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  i^^  decembre  1786. 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr  Sdt. 

a  une  Cour  tenue  du  i^^  decembre  1786. 
M"  jean  B*^  LaCroix  presidant       Louis  Chatel 
antoine  girardin  Joseph  Lapensee 

Mathieu  saucier 
Mr  JOSEPH  Labuxiere  demandeur  contre  jean  B*«  dumay 

deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  a  presente  un  billet  contre  led*  dumay  par 
lequel  il  demande  p^  restant  quarante  Cinq  livres  en  argent  ou 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1786  257 

Court  ordered  M.  LaCroix  to  build  the  said  party  fence  of 
pointed   stakes,  good  and  acceptable,  for  which  he  shall  cause 
himself  to  be  reimbursed  by  the  said  M.  Pentecoste.      We  con- 
demn M.  LaCroix  to  the  costs.  At.  Girardin. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  the  second  of  November  next. 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.                         J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 
[A  blank  page  across  which  is  written] 
Passed  by  error  and  inadvertence. 
At  a  Court,  November,  2,  1786. 
MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President.        Louis  Trottier. 
Antoine  Girardin.                           '            Louis  Chatel. 
Mat.  Saucier.                                              Clement  Alarie. 
Joseph  Lapanc^. 
M.  Isaac  Levy,  Plaintiff,  vs  Jean  Bte.  Baron,  Defendant. 
M.  Levy  produced  an  account  due  from  the  defendant  for  the 
sum  of  three  hundred  and  sixty  livres  in  money  for  supplies  made 
to  the  said  Baron.     Several  articles  of  this  account  the  defendant 
has  been  unwilling  to  approve  and  demands  that  it  be  itemized 
from  beginning  to  end. 

Whereupon  the  Court  decreed  that  M.  Levy  shall  furnish  the 
defendant  his  account  itemized  article  by  article  with  the  dates  and 
credit  which  he  shall  have  received,  to  be  disapproved  or  approved 
by  the  defendant,  and  a  decree  for  the  payment  thereof  to  whom- 
soever it  belongs  will  be  made  before  a  magistrate  of  the  Court; 
the  expense  being  reserved  until  the  final  decision  in  regard  to  their 
accounts. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  December  i,  1786. 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

At  a  Court  held  December  i,  1786. 
MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President.        Louis  Chatel. 
Antoine  Girardin.  Joseph  Lapanc^. 

Matthieu  Saucier 

M.  Joseph  La  Curie,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jean  Bte.  Dumay, 
Defendant 
The  plaintiff  presented  a  note  against  the  said  Dumay  on  which 
he  demands  as  balance  forty-five  livres  in  money  or  flour,  and 


2s8  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

farine  Echti.    le  deffendeur  a  dit  navoir  point  dargent  p^  payer 
qui  est  tout  ce  que  les  parties  ont  dit. 

La  Cour  a  condanne  le  deffendeur  a  payer  sans  delais  Et  aux 
frais.  J  B  H  LaCroix 

M^  de  S*  pierre  cur^  de  cette  paroisse  a  presente  Sa  requete 
pour  demander  linterdiction  de  la  boisson  aux  sauvages.  La 
Cour  a  ordonne  que  les  ordonnances  rendues  a  ce  sujet  cy  devant 
seront  publiees  dimanche  prochain  afin  que  personne  ne  lignore 
Et  Les  contrevenant  punis  selon  lesd^  ordonnances. 
a  la  meme  Cour. 

M^  DUBREUIL  marchand  de  la  rive  espagnole  Contre  fr 
TROTiER  comparant  par  Charles  duCharme  son  fonde  de  pouvoir 
Et  charge  de  Ses  affaires. 

Le  S^  dubreuil  demande  le  payement  dune  somme  de  deux 
cent  Cinq  piastres  quatre  Escalins  suivant  le  Billet  dud^  s^  trotier 
Echus  depuis  le  mois  doctobre  led^  Billet  a  ordre  En  datte  du  13 
fevrier  de  cette  presente  annee. 

Le  deffendeur  a  dit  navoir  point  de  fond  quant  a  present  a- 
partenant  au  s^  trotier  p^  payer  mais  quil  avoit  En  main  des 
obligations  a  luy  dues,  quil  aloit  forcer  les  payments  pour  Satis- 
faire  aud*  Billet. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  que  vu  le  manque  de  fond  Entre  Les 
mains  du  s^  ducharme  Et  labsence  du  M^  trotier  que  M^  dubreuil 
Suspendre  les  payement  jusques  au  mois  doctobre  de  Lannde 
prochaine  Et  luy  sera  pay^  par  m^  trotier  Linterest  suivant  le 
taux  du  Commerce  condamnons  le  s^  trotier  aux  frais. 

a  La  meme  Cour. 
Le  S^  Billet  demandeur  contre  Louis  Lecompte  defendeur 

Le  demandeur  a  produit  un  Billet  contre  Le  deffendeur  de  la 
somme  de  deux  centlivres  En  argent  Echus  depuis  le  mois  doc- 
tobre dernier  de  la  somme  de  deux  cent  livres  requerant  que  le 
deffendeur  le  paye  sans  delais  et  aux  frais  et  depens. 

Le  deffendeur  a  replique  que  SEtoit  pour  un  Boeuf  Et  quil 
N'avoit  pas  pu  se  Servir  du  Boeuf  quil  Ne  pouvoit  pas  le  payer 
Et  que  le  S^  Blay  actuellement  icy  Etoit  present  quil  sait  ce  que 

1  See  p.  215. 


COURT  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1786  259 

which  has  matured.     The  defendant  said  that  he  had  no  money  to 
pay,  which  is  all  the  parties  have  said. 

The  Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay  the  note  without 
delay  and  the  costs.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

M.  de  St.  Pierre,  Curi  of  this  parish,  presented  his  petition 
in  order  to  request  the  prohibition  from  giving  drink  to  the 
savages.  The  Court  decreed  that  the  ordinances  rendered  here- 
before  on  this  subject  shall  be  published  next  Sunday  in  order 
that  no  person  be  ignorant  and  that  offenders  shall  be  punished 
according  to  the  said  ordinances.^ 

At  the  same  Court. 

M.  DuBREUiL,  trader  from  the  Spanish  bank,  vs.  Fr.  Trottier, 
represented  by  Charles  DuCharme,  his  private  attorney  and 
commissioned  with  his  affairs. 

M.  Dubreuil  demands  the  payment  of  a  sum  of  two  hundred 
and  five  piastres  four  escalins  according  to  the  note  to  order  under 
date  of  February  13  of  this  present  year,  given  by  the  said  M. 
Trottier  and  matured  since  the  month  of  October. 

The  defendant  said  that  he  did  not  have  any  funds  at  present 
belonging  to  M.  Trottier  with  which  to  pay;  but  that  he  had  in 
his  hands  obligations  due  him,  of  which  he  was  going  to  force 
payments  to  satisfy  the  said  note. 

The  Court  decreed  that,  in  view  of  the  lack  of  funds  in  the 
hands  of  M.  DuCharme  and  of  the  absence  of  M.  Trottier,  M. 
Dubreuil  shall  suspend  payment  until  the  month  of  October  of  next 
year  and  there  shall  be  paid  him  by  M.  Trottier  the  interest  accord- 
ing to  the  commercial  rate.  We  condemn  M.  Trottier  pay  the  costs. 
At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Billet,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Louis  Lecomte  Defendant 

The  plaintiff  produced  a  note  against  the  defendant  for  the 
sum  of  two  hundred  livres  in  money,  matured  since  the  month 
of  October  last,  and  requires  that  the  defendant  pay  him  without 
delay  with  the  costs  and  charges. 

The  defendant  answered  that  it  was  for  an  ox  and  that  he  had 
not  been  able  to  make  use  of  the  ox;  that  he  could  not  pay  for 
it;   and  that  M.  Blay,  now  here,  was  present  and  that  he  knew 


26o  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

le  deffendeur  a  dit  au  s^  Beausoleil  et  leur  Conventions,  sur 
quoy  avons  fait  paroitre,  \e  S'"  Blay  lequil  apres  sermant  par  luy 
fait  sur  les  S*  Evangiles  Et  interoge  sil  sait  les  conventions  des 
parties  a  dit  quil  ne  savoit  point  leurs  conditions  si  non  quil  avoit 
Entendu  que  Le  s^  LeCompte  avoit  achete  du  s^  Beausoleil, 
le  boeuf  p^  deux  cent  livres  qui  est  tout  ce  quil  a  dit  savoir.  le 
tout  examine  la  Cour  Condamne  led*  Louis  Lecomte  a  payer  au 
s^  Beausoleil  la  Somme  de  deux  cent  livres  p'"  le  montant  du 
boeuf  Et  ce  sans  delais,  si  mieux  naime  led*  s^  Beausoleil  repren- 
dre  le  boeuf  au  Cas  quil  se  retrouve  a  son  Choix  condamnons 
led*  Lecompte  aux  frais  qui  seront  avanc^s  par  le  s^  Beausoleil 
Et  rembources  par  led*  Lecompte. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
Le  S^  MOTARD  demandeur    contre  Laurant  hamelin  deffendeur 

Le  S^  motard  demande  au  deffendeur  le  payement  de  Son 
Billet  de  la  Somme  de  Cent  quatre  livres  Seize  sols  En  p*^*® 
Echus.  le  deffendeur  a  dit  que  la  pelterie  ne  valoit  dans  ce 
temps  que  vingt  sols  En  argent  Et  quil  na  jamais  Entednti  faire 
un  billet  que  de  Cent  quatre  livres  Seize  sols  En  argent  quil  offroit 
de  payer  ladite  somme  de  Cent  quatre  livres  seize  sols  En  argent 
et  non  en  pelterie. 

Led*  s^  Motard  a  replique  quil  Etoit  vray  que  la  pelterie  ne 
valoit  pas  plus  que  largent  dans  le  temps  que  le  billet  a  Ete 
Consenty  mais  que  par  le  retard  du  payement  il  demandoit  que 
son  payement  fut  fait  suivant  le  Billet  que  dailleur  SEtoit  pour 
Equipement  Et  quil  avoit  Vendu  aud*  hamelin  ce  quil  avoit 
pris  En  pelterie  Et  non  En  argent,  le  tout  considere  La  Cour  a 
Condamne  led*  hamelin  a  payer  son  Billet  en  Entier  de  la  Somme 
de  Cent  quatre  livres  Seize  sols  en  pelterie  Et  ce  sans  delais  Et 
aux  frais  qui  seront  avances  par  le  s^  motard  et  a  luy  Rembourcez 
par  led*  hamelin. 

a  la  meme  cour. 

Le  S^  Motard  demandeur  Contre  Francois  turgeon  def- 
fendeur 

Le  demandeur  requiere  le  payement  de  plusieurs  articles  de 
travail  quil  devoit  luy  faire  Et  quil  na  point  fait  le  tout  verbalement. 


COURT  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1786  261 

what  the  defendant  said  to  M.  Beausoleil  and  their  agreement. 
Whereupon  we  summoned  M.  Blay,  who,  after  taking  oath  on 
the  Holy  Gospels  and  being  asked  if  he  knew  about  the  agreement 
of  the  parties,  said  that  he  did  not  know  the  conditions,  except  that 
he  had  understood  that  M.  Lecomte  had  bought  from  M.  Beau- 
soleil the  ox  for  two  hundred  livres,  which  is  all  he  said  he  knew. 
After  examining  all,  the  Court  condemns  the  said  Louis  Lecomte 
to  pay  to  M.  Beausoleil  the  sum  of  two  hundred  livres  for  the 
price  of  the  ox  and  this  without  delay,  unless  the  said  Beausoleil 
prefers  to  take  back  the  ox  in  case  it  be  found  to  his  liking.  We  con- 
demn the  said  Lecomte  to  pay  the  costs,  which  shall  be  advanced 
by  M.  Beausoleil  and  reimbursed  to  him  by  the  said  Lecomte. 
At  the  same  Court. 

M.  MoTARD,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Laurent  Hamelin,  Defendant. 

M.  Motard  demands  of  the  defendant  the  payment  of  his 
note  for  the  sum  of  one  hundred  and  four  livres  sixteen  sols  in 
peltries,  which  is  matured.  The  defendant  said  that  peltries 
were  worth  at  the  time  only  twenty  sols  in  money  and  that  he  never 
meant  to  make  a  note  except  for  one  hundred  and  four  livres 
sixteen  sols  in  money,  that  he  offered  to  pay  the  said  sum  of  one 
hundred  and  four  livres  sixteen  sols  in  money  and  not  in  peltries. 

The  said  M.  Motard  answered  that  it  was  true  that  peltries 
were  not  worth  more  than  money  at  the  time  that  the  note  was  ac- 
cepted; but  that,  on  account  of  the  delay  in  payment,  he  demanded 
that  the  payment  should  be  made  according  to  the  note,  and  that  be- 
sides it  was  for  equipment;  and  that  he  had  sold  to  the  said  Hamelin, 
what  he  had  taken,  for  peltries  and  not  for  money.  After  consid- 
ering all,  the  Court  condemned  the  said  Hamelin  to  pay  his  entire 
note  for  the  sum  of  one  hundred  and  four  livres  sixteen  sols  in  pel- 
tries and  this  without  delay,  and  to  pay  the  costs,  which  shall  be  ad- 
vanced by  M.  Motard  and  reimbursed  to  him  by  the  said  Hamelin. 
At  the  same  Court. 

M.  Motard,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Francois  Turgeon,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  demands  the  payment  of  several  items  of  work, 
which  the  defendant  ought  to  do  for  him,  and  which  he  has  not 
done,  all  on  a  verbal  agreement. 


262  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Le  deffendeur  a  produit  un  Compte  douvrage  Et  de  joum^e  a 
la  charge  du  s^  motard. 

Les  quels  comptes  non  p{i  intruire  suffisament  La  Cour  p^ 
donner  un  jugement  juste,  le  tout  Examine  elle  renvoy  les  par- 
ties a  Se  pourvoir  devant  des  arbitres  devant  qui  ils  produiront 
leurs  comptes  depart  Et  dautres. 

Et  al  Egard  du  bled  Et  recolte  quils  ont  En  societe  la  cour  a 
decide  que  tout  sera  Raportd  a  la  masse  Et  que  led*  Bled  sera 
Batu  a  frais  Commun  Cest  a  dire  que  le  s^  motard  fournira  un 
homme  et  le  Nourira  Et  payera;  led*  turgeon  Se  fournira  et  se 
Nourira  pour  le  tout  Batu  sans  que  qui  que  ce  soit  y  puisse  toucher, 
led*  bled  sera  partag^  savoir  un  tier  p^  turgeon  Et  les  deux  tier 
p'"  s^  motard.  toutes  fois  la  semances  de  dix  neuf  minots  pre- 
levee  par  le  s'"  motard  Et  tous  les  frais  de  ladite  recolte,  tant  des 
trois  minots  que  le  s^  motard  a  fait  semer  que  les  quatre  minots 
que  turgeon  a  Seme  seront  payez  le  tout  sur  la  masse  du  bled  La 
baterie  de  la  grange  Sera  racommodee  par  led*  turgeon  et  le  S^ 
motard  a  frais  Commun  et  par  moitie. 

Et  pour  les  reparations  de  la  maison  que  le  S^  motard  demande 
aud*  turgeon  Et  que  led*  turgeon  na  point  fait,  condamnons  led* 
turgeon  a  payer  Cinquante  livres  au  s^  motard  p^  lesd*  repara- 
tions. Et  les  frais  du  proces  compensez  chacun  par  moitie  qui 
seront  avances  par  le  S^  motard  et  lautre  moitie  luy  Sera  Rem- 
bourcee  par  led*  turgeon. 

La  Cour  est  ajournee  a  i^^  Janvier  1787. 

Labuxiere  gfier  J  B  H  LaCroix  pr  sdt. 


a  une  cour  du  deux  Janvier  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt  sept 
tenue  par. 

M""^  jean  B*^  LaCroix  clement  alary 

ant  girardin  Louis  Chatel 

Joseph  Lapensee 
Le  S^  Dumoulin  demandeur  contre  Pierre  troge  deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  requiere  que  le  deffendeur  luy  paye  le  restant 
de  Son  Billet  Echu  duquel  il  y  a  Eu  ci  devant  condamnation. 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1787        263 

The  defendant  produced  an  account  of  work  and  of  day's 
labor  done  at  the  charge  of  M.  Motard. 

Since  these  accounts  could  not  instruct  the  Court  sufficiently 
to  make  it  possible  to  render  a  just  judgment  and  after  examining 
all,  the  Court  dismissed  the  parties  to  plead  before  arbitrators, 
before  whom  they  shall  produce  their  accounts. 

And  in  regard  to  the  wheat  and  crops  which  they  have  in  part- 
nership, the  Court  decided  that  all  shall  be  accounted  for  in  the 
mass  and  that  the  said  wheat  shall  be  thrashed  at  the  common 
expense,  that  is  to  say,  M.  Motard  shall  furnish  a  man  with  his 
keep  and  wages  and  the  said  Turgeon  shall  furnish  himself  with 
his  keep,  for  the  time  of  the  whole  thrashing.  Without  anyone 
whomsoever  meddling  with  it,  the  grain  shall  be  divided  as 
follows,  one  third  to  Turgeon  and  two  thirds  to  M.  Motard. 
Yet  the  seed  of  the  nineteen  minots  deducted  previously  by  M. 
Motard,  and  all  the  expense  of  the  said  crop,  as  well  as  some  three 
minots  which  M.  Motard  has  had  sown,  and  the  four  minots 
which  Turgeon  sowed,  shall  all  be  paid  from  the  whole  quantity  of 
grain.  The  threshing-floor  of  the  barn  shall  be  repaired  by  the  said 
Turgeon  and  M.  Motard  at  common  expense,  equally  divided. 

And  for  the  repairs  of  the  house,  which  M.  Motard  demands 
of  the  said  Turgeon  and  which  the  said  Turgeon  has  not  made, 
we  condemn  the  said  Turgeon  to  pay  fifty  livres  to  M.  Motard 
for  the  said  repairs.  And  each  shall  pay  half  of  the  costs  of  the 
suit,  which  shall  be  advanced  by  M.  Motard,  and  one  half  shall 
be  reimbursed  to  him  by  the  said  Tiurgeon. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  January  i,  1787. 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres, 

At  a  Court  of  the  second  of  January,  1787,  held  by 
MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.  Clement  Alarie. 

Antoine  Girardin.  Louis  Chatel. 

Joseph  Lapance. 
M.  DuMOULDsr,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Troge,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  demands  that  the  defendant  pay  him  the  balance 
of  his  matured  note  for  which  judgment  has  been  given  here- 
before. 


264  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Le  deffendeur  a  repondii  quil  le  payeroit  a  present  sil  avoit  de 
quoy,  mais  quil  le  payeroit  le  plustost  quil  pouroit. 

Sur  quoy  la  Cour  a  ordonn^  au  defendeur  de  payer  Ce  quil 
Redoit  aud^  s^  dumoulin  dans  le  Cour  de  ce  mois,  lequel  terns 
passe  la  presente  Sentence  Sera  mise  a  Execution  condamne  le 
deffendeur  aux  depens. 

a  la  requisition  de  Thorn  Bredy  la  Cour  a  Saisy  entre  les  mains 
du  S^  jean  B*®  LaCroix  la  valeur  dun  Cost^  de  Cuir  et  dun  Eperon 
qui  lui  sont  dub  par  le  S^  Lorens  taneur  de  la  partie  espagnole  a 
qui  le  S^  Lacroix  a  des  fonds  Entre  les  mains,  la  Cour  luy  deffend 
de  sen  dessaisir  que  led*  lorams  n'ait  satisfait  led*  Thom  Brady 
ou  quil  nen  soit  ordonne  et  Sera  signiffi^  aud*  S^  LaCroix. 

Sur  la  demande  du  S^  Beausoleil 

Le  S^  Louis  Lecomte  ayant  refuse  sur  notre  Sentence  rendue 
contre  luy  de  payer  aud*  s^  Beausoleil  apres  que  commandemant 
et  signiff"^  de  ladite  sentence  luy  a  Ete  faite  par  notre  huissier  la 
Cour  ordonne  que  la  terre  dud*  LeCompte  dun  arpent  de  large 
situee  a  la  prairie  du  pont  tenant  a  Sans  facon  et  a  Courville  sera 
saisie  Et  vendue  judicierement  a  la  porte  de  lEglise  par  trois  Crimes 
au  plus  offrant  Et  dernier  Encherisseur  au  contant  Et  jusqua  la 
Concurrance  de  ce  quil  doit  aud*  Beausoleil  frais  et  depens. 

La  Cour  est  ajourne  au  i^^  fevrier  prochain. 


aujourdhuy  quartorze  Janvier  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  sept 
est  comparti  au  greffe  de  la  Cour  en  presence  de  M^  Jean  B*®  Du- 
buque commandant  de  ce  vilage 

Le  S^  augustin  dubuque  marchand  voyageur  demeurant  pre- 
sentement  en  ce  susd*  village  des  Cahos.  lequel  a  declare  quil 
desiroit  de  devenir  un  des  sujets  des  Etats  unis  de  Lamerique  et 
a  fait  le  Sermant  de  fidelite  aux  dits  Etats  ainsy  quil  suit.  Je  fait 
Sermant  de  renoncer  et  refuser  toute  fidelity  a  george  trois  Roi  de 
la  grande  Bretagne  Ses  hoirs  Et  Sucesseurs,  que  je  seray  fidel  Et 
porteray  vray  fidelity  a  la  republique  de  la  verginie  comme  un  Etat 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1787  265 

The  defendant  answered  that  he  would  pay  it  now,  if  he  had 
means;  but  that  he  would  pay  it  as  soon  as  he  could. 

Whereupon  the  Court  commanded  the  defendant  to  pay  what 
he  still  owed  to  the  said  M.  Dumoulin  in  the  course  of  this  month; 
and  when  that  time  was  past,  the  present  judgment  shall  be  put 
in  execution.     Condemned  the  defendant  to  pay  the  expenses. 

On  the  requsition  of  Tom  Brady  the  Court  has  seized  from 
the  funds  belonging  to  M.  Lorens,  tanner  on  the  Spanish  side, 
now  in  the  possession  of  M.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  the  value  of  a 
side  of  leather  and  a  spur,  which  is  due  him  from  the  said  M. 
Lorens.  The  Court  forbids  M.  LaCroix  to  dispossess  himself 
thereof  until  the  said  Lorens  has  satisfied  the  said  Tom  Brady 
or  an  order  thereto  has  been  made;  and  notice  shaU  be  served  on 
the  said  LaCroix. 

On  the  prayer  of  M.  Beausoleil. 

M.  Louis  Lecomte  having  refused,  upon  our  judgment  ren- 
dered against  him,  to  pay  the  said  M.  Beausoleil,  after  formal 
demand  and  notification  of  the  said  judgment  was  made  to  him 
by  our  huissier,  the  Court  decrees  that  the  land  of  the  said  Le- 
comte, of  an  arpent  in  width,  situated  in  the  Prairie  du  Pont 
adjacent  to  the  lands  of  Sansfa^on  and  Courville,  shall  be  seized 
and  sold  by  judicial  sale  at  the  door  of  the  church,  after  three 
publications,  to  the  highest  bidder  for  cash  and  up  to  the  equiva- 
lent of  what  he  owes  to  the  said  Beausoleil  with  costs  and  ex- 
penses. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  next  February  i. 

To-day  the  fourteenth  of  January,  1787,  there  appeared  at 
the  record-office  of  the  Court  in  the  presence  of  M.  Jean  Bte. 
Dubuque,  Commandant  of  this  village, 

M.  Augustin  Dubuque,  traveling  trader,  dwelling  at  present 
in  this  village  aforesaid  of  Cahokia,  who  declared  that  he  desired 
to  become  one  of  the  subjects  of  the  United  States  of  America 
and  made  oath  of  fidelity  to  the  said  States  as  follows:  I  make 
oath  to  renounce  and  refuse  all  fidelity  to  George  III.,  King  of 
Great  Britain,  his  heirs  and  successors;  and  that  I  will  be  faith- 
ful and  bear  fidelity  to  the  Republic  of  Virginia  as  a  free  and  in- 


266  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

libre  et  independant  Et  jamais  je  ne  feray  ni  ne  feray  faire  aucune 
Chose  qui  puisse  etre  prejudiciable  ni  injurieuse  a  la  liberty  Et 
independance  dud*  Etat  comme  est  declard  par  le  congre.  Et 
aussi  que  je  discouvriray  et  feray  savoir  a  quelque  juge  de  paix 
dud*  Etat  toutes  trahisons  ou  Conspirations  qui  Seront  venues  ou 
pourront  venir  a  ma  connoissance  formee  contre  led*  Etat  ou  quel- 
quautres  des  Etats  unis  de  Lamerique.  duquel  Sermant  led* 
augustin  dubuque  a  requis  acte  En  presence  de  Lassemblee  tenue 
cejourdhuy  En  la  maison  du  M^  fr.  Saucier,  Et  Encore  dud*  S^ 
jean  B*^  dubuque  Commandant  de  M^  jean  B*^  LaCroix  presidant 
magistrat  et  dud*  S^  francois  Saucier  temoins  qui  ont  avec  led*  S'' 
augustin  debuque  signe  le  present  lesd*  jour  et  an. 
[Signed]      Aug.  Dubuque  B  Dubuque 

marque  de  DuCharme 

+ 

F.  Courier 

Labuxiere  gfier         J.  B.  H.  LaCroix  pr  sdt. 


a  une  Cour  du  19  fevrier  1787. 
M'*  saucier  presidant  a  1' absence  du  M^  LaCroix 
ant  girardin  Joseph  Lapens^e 

Louis  Chatel  M*  saucier 

clement  alary 
demandeur  M^  i\  Saucier  contre  Joseph  Baribaud 
Le  demandeur  a  dit  que  le  deffendeur  luy  devoit  un  milier  de 
Bardaux  Et  quil  le  luy  avoit  paye.  le  deffendeur  a  denie  par  des 
raisons  repliques  et  autres  propos  que  la  Cour  a  bien  entendu  Et 
le  tout  murement  Examine,  le  serment  prete  par  p^^  leperche  Com- 
me temoins.  Ladite  cour  condamne  Ledit  Baribaud  a  rendre 
dans  la  Cour  du  S^  saucier  un  millier  de  Bardaux  bon  et  recevable 
sujet  a  visite  le  tout  aux  frais  dud*  Baribaud  et  payera  au  s'" 
saucier  Les  frais  du  proems  liguidez  [sic]  a  quinze  livres  dont 
le  s^  saucier  fera  compte  a  la  justice  ce  qui  sera  execute  le  tout 
sans  delais. 

A*  G]>ardin 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1787       267 

dependent  state;  and  I  will  do  nothing  nor  will  I  cause  anything 
to  be  done,  which  can  be  prejudicial  or  injurious  to  the  liberty 
and  independence  of  the  said  State,  as  is  declared  by  Congress. 
And  also  I  swear  that  I  will  disclose  and  make  known  to  some 
justice  of  the  peace  of  the  said  State  all  treasons  or  conspiracies, 
which  shall  have  come  or  may  come  to  my  knowledge,  formed 
against  the  said  State  or  others  of  the  United  States  of  America. 
Of  which  oath  the  said  Augustin  Dubuque  demanded  certificate. 
Given  in  the  presence  of  the  assembly,  held  to-day  in  the  house  of 
M.  Fr.  Saucier,  and  also  in  the  presence  of  M.  Jean  Bte.  Dubuque, 
Commandant  of  [this  village]  and  of  M.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  Pres- 
ident and  Magistrate,  and  of  the  said  M.  Francois  Saucier, 
witness,  who  have  with  the  said  M.  Augustin  Dubuque  signed 
the  present  the  said  day  and  year. 

[Signed]  Aug.  Dubuque.  Aug.  Dubuque. 

Mark  of  DuCharme. 

+ 
Fr.  Courier. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

At  a  Court,  February  19,  1787. 

M.  Saucier,  President  in  the  absence  of  M.  LaCroix. 

Ant.  Girardin.  Joseph  Lapanc^. 

Louis  Chatel.  Matt.  Saucier. 

Clement  Alarie. 

M.  Fr.  Saucier,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Joseph  Baribaud. 
The  plaintiff  said  that  the  defendant  owed  him  a  thousand 
shingles  and  he  had  paid  him  for  them.  The  defendant  denied 
by  arguments,  rejoinders  and  other  talk,  which  the  Court  has 
attentively  heard;  and  having  carefully  examined  all  and  the  oath 
taken  by  Pierre  Laperche  as  witness,  the  said  Court  condemns 
the  said  Baribaud  to  deliver  in  the  yard  of  M.  Saucier  a  thousand 
shingles,  good  and  acceptable,  and  subject  to  inspection,  the 
whole  at  the  expense  of  the  said  Baribaud;  and  he  shall  pay  to 
M.  Saucier  the  costs  of  the  suit  which  are  fixed  at  fifteen  livres, 
for  which  M.  Saucier  shall  make  account  to  justice,  for  all  of  which 
there  will  be  execution  without  delay.  At.  Girardin. 


268  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  la  meme  cour. 
Louis  VADEBONCOEUR  demandeur  centre  Gabriel  Baron  qui 
na  voulu  paroitre  aprds  lordre  recu 
Le  demandeur  a  produit  un  compte  de  fourniture  montant  a 
vingt  cinq  livres  quil  a  sermante  devant  la  Cour. 

vti  le  refus  du  deffendeur  de  ne  vouloir  paroitre  la  dite  cour  la 
condamne  a  payer  sans  delais  aud*  demandeur  la  somme  de  vingt 
Cinq  livres  Et  En  quinze  livres  de  frais.  qui  seront  avances  par 
le  demandeur  et  a  luy  rembourcds  par  led*  gabriel  Baron  ce  qui 
sera  Execute. 

La  Cour  est  ajournde  au  i^^  mars  1787. 

f.  saucier, 
a  une  Cour  du  premier  mars  1787. 
M'*'  LaCroix  presidant  Joseph  Lapensde 

A*  girardin  Clement  alary 

Les  deputez  de  la  fabrique  des  Cahos  Etant  assemblez  devant 
la  Cour  pour  Se  laver  de  Limputation  qui  leur  a  Ete  faite  davoir 
recele  des  papiers  que  M^  augustin  dubuque  leur  avoit  confie, 
leqeul  dit  s"^  dubuque  apres  un  Certain  tems  et  plusieurs  Recher- 
che a  dit  Les  avoir  trouve  Entre  deux  pieux  de  son  terrain  M^  de 
S*  pierre  cure  de  cette  paroisse  present  a  requis  le  sermant  dun 
chacun  des  dits  deputez  comme  il  Navoit  aucune  part  a  lEgare- 
ment  des  papiers.  Lesquels  devant  La  Cour  Savoir  le  s^  francois 
saucier,  s^  jean  B^  LaCroix,  s^  antoine  Girardin,  Charle  du- 
Charme,  francois  Courier  Joseph  Labuxiere,  grefier,  Et  Mond* 
S^  de  S*  pierre  cure  ont  fait  led*  sermant. 

sur  quoy  la  Cour  les  a  declare  absout  de  tout  soupcon  a  cet 
Egard.  sur  la  declaration  que  le  s^  dubuque  fait.  Et  de  son  ser- 
mant quil  a  fait  quil  ignoroit  qui  les  avoit  mis  a  cet  Endroit  dont  il 
decharge  les  dits  deputez  Et  tous  autres. 

marque  de  marque  de 

+  + 

Joseph  Lapensee  Clement  alary 

Les  S'"^  Lonval,  deslonchamps  Et  Joseph  Lapensee  on  de- 
mandd  le  des  domagement  des  Clotures  des  terres  de  lEglise 
vendue  a  rente  le  dimanche  25  de  ce  mois.     la   Cour  a  ren- 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1787  269 

At  the  same  Court. 
Louis  Vadeboncoeur,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Gabriel  Baron,  who  was 
unwilling  to  appear  after  receiving  summons. 
The  plaintiff  produced  an  account  for  supplies  amounting  to 
twenty-five  livres  to  which  he  made  oath  before  the  Court. 

In  view  of  the  refusal  of  the  defendant  to  appear,  the  said 
Court  condemned  him  to  pay  without  delay  to  the  said  plaintiff 
the  sum  of  twenty-five  livres,  and  fifteen  livres  for  costs,  which 
shall  be  advanced  by  the  plaintiff  and  reimbursed  to  him  by  the 
said  Gabriel  Baron,  for  which  there  will  be  execution. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  March  i,  1787. 

F.  Saucier. 

At  a  Court  March,  i,  1787. 
MM.  LaCroix,  President.         Joseph  Lapanc6. 
Ant.  Girardin.  Clement  Alarie. 

The  deputies  of  the  vestry-board  of  Cahokia  having  assembled 
before  the  court  to  clear  themselves  of  the  charge,  which  has 
been  made  against  them,  of  having  concealed  some  papers  which 
M.  Augustin  Dubuque  had  confided  to  their  care,  and  which 
the  said  M.  Dubuque  said  he  had  found,  after  a  certain  time  and 
several  searches,  between  two  stakes  of  his  land,  M.  de  St. 
Pierre,  curS  of  this  parish  who  was  present,  demanded  the  oath 
from  each  of  the  said  deputies  that  he  had  no  share  in  the  loss  of 
the  papers.  The  following  have  taken  the  said  oath  before  the 
Court,  to  wit:  M.  Franfois  Saucier,  M.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  M. 
Antoine  Girardin,  Charles  DuCharme,  Francois  Courier,  Joseph 
Labuxiere,  Clerk,  and  the  said  Sieur  de  St.  Pierre. 

Whereupon  the  Court  declared  them  absolved  from  all  suspi- 
cion in  this  respect  on  the  affidavit  which  M.  Dubuque  made 
and  his  oath  which  he  made  that  he  did  not  know  who  put  them 
in  that  place,  with  which  he  discharges  the  said  deputies  and  all 
others. 

Mark  +  of 
Joseph  Lapanc6 

Mark  +  of 
Clement  Alarie 


270  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

voyer   la    prochaine    Cour   pour    En    decider    ne    se    trouvant 
complette. 

La  Cour  est  ajourn^e  au  i®^  avril  1787. 

J  B  H  LaCroix. 


aujourdhuy  premier  mars  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt  sept  Est 
Comparue  au  greffe  de  la  Cour  En  presence  de  M^^  Les  magis- 
trats,  Marie  Louise  Lemire  veuve  de  deffunt  francois  Grosle  tue 
par  les  Sauvages  Environ  huit  jours  apres  leur  mariage  Et  comme 
led*  grosle  avant  detre  marie  avant  [sic]  lexposante  avoit  Contracte 
differentes  debtes  avant  dEntrer  En  Communaute  avec  elle  Et  quil 
ne  se  trouve  ancunne  Chose  pour  remplir  son  douaire  porte  par  son 
Contract  de  mariage  que  la  somme  de  deux  cent  livres  qui  sont 
Entre  les  mains  de  francois  Biguier  dit  grosle  pere  dud*  deffunt 
quelle  reclame  p^  ses  droits  qui  sont  a  plus  forte  somme  cest  pour- 
quoy  ayant  Examind  les  affaires  dud*  deffunt  Et  les  debtes  quil 
a  Contracte  tant  avant  son  mariage  que  frais  de  nocces  et  apr^s  le 
susdit  mariage  Et  voyant  par  le  deces  dud*  deffunt  grosle  Biguier 
son  mary  que  la  Communautd  quil  y  avoit  luy  est  plus  honnereuse 
que  profitable  Elle  a  declare  devant  ladite  Cour  et  declare  quelle 
renoncd  comme  de  fait  Elle  a  renonce  a  la  Communaute  quil  y 
avoit  Entre  led*  deffunt  francois  Biguier  dit  Grosle  Et  Elle  pour 
les  tor  quelle  En  souffriroit  Et  quelle  En  soufre,  actuellement 
declarant  quelle  se  desiste  de  ladite  Communaute  et  que  ledit  def- 
funt ny  a  Rien  aporte  ny  guains  ny  travaux  declare  En  outre  ladite 
veuve  quelle  ne  sest  immissde  En  aucunne  facon  de  payer  ni  re- 
cevoir  aucunne  Chose  qui  ay  pu  apartenir  aud*  deffunt,  Et  que  led* 
francois  Grosle  pere  dud*  deffunt  a  pris  Et  retire  tout  ce  qui  pou- 
voit  apartenir  a  Son  dit  fils,  quelle  Reclame  seulement  la  somme 
de  deux  cent  livres  que  led*  francois  grosle  a  Entre  ses  mains  apar- 
tenante  aud*  deffunt  son  mary  provenante  de  la  succession  de 
Sa  mere  pour  luy  tenir  lieu  de  douaire  Et  preciput  a  Elle  accorde 
par  son  Contract  de  mariage  avec  led*  francois  Biguier  dit  grosle  de 
laquelle  declaration  Et  renonciation  elle  a  requis  acte  que  la  Cour 

1  For  lack  of  a  quorum. 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1787  271 

MM.  Lonval,  Deslonchamps  and  Joseph  Lapancd  demanded 
damages  for  the  fences  of  the  church  lands,  the  leases  of  which 
were  sold  Sunday,  the  25th  of  this  month.  The  Court  dismissed 
the  case  to  the  next  Court  for  decision,  not  finding  itself  complete.^ 

The  Court  adjourned  to  April  i,  1787. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

To-day,  the  first  of  March,  1787,  there  appeared  at  the  ofl&ce 
of  the  Court  in  the  presence  of  the  magistrates,  Marie  Louise 
Lemire,  widow  of  the  deceased  Grosld,  who  was  killed  by  the 
savages  about  a  week  after  their  marriage;  and  since  the  said 
Grosl^,  before  being  married  to  the  petitioner  and  entering  into 
a  community  of  goods  with  her,  had  contracted  divers  debts,  and 
there  is  found  nothing  from  which  to  refund  her  dower,  declared 
by  her  contract  of  marriage,  except  the  sum  of  two  hundred 
livres,  which  are  in  the  hands  of  Francois  Biguier  called  Grosle, 
father  of  the  said  deceased,  and  which  she  claims  for  her  dues, 
which  are  for  a  greater  sum;  this  is  the  reason  why,  after  examin- 
ing the  affairs  of  the  said  deceased  and  the  obligations  which  he 
contracted  as  well  before  his  marriage  as  for  the  expenses  of  the 
marriage  and  after  the  marriage  aforesaid,  and  seeing  from  the 
death  of  the  said  deceased  Grosld  Biguier,  her  husband,  that  the 
community  of  goods  which  exists  is  more  burdensome  than  profit- 
able for  her,  she  declared  before  the  said  Court  and  declares 
that  she  renounces,  as  in  fact  she  has  renounced,  the  community 
of  goods,  which  existed  between  the  said  deceased  Frangois  Biguier 
called  Grosle  and  herself,  on  account  of  the  wrong  which  she 
would  suffer  and  is  suffering  from  it;  and  now  she  declares  that 
she  abandons  the  said  community  of  goods;  and  that  the  said 
deceased  contributed  nothing,  neither  gains  nor  work,  thereto; 
the  said  widow  declares  furthermore  that  she  has  not  entered  upon 
possession  in  any  way  either  by  paying  or  receiving  any  thing 
which  may  have  belonged  to  the  deceased;  and  that  the  said 
Francois  Grosld,  father  of  the  deceased,  has  taken  and  withdrawn 
all  that  which  could  belong  to  his  said  son,  and  that  she  claims 
only  the  sum  of  two  hundred  livres,  which  the  said  Francois  Grosle 
has  in  his  possession,  belonging  to  the  deceased,  her  husband,  and 


272  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

luy  a  octroy^  sous  le  sermant  quelle  a  fait  de  n'avoir  Rien  detourne 
des  effets  appartenants  aud*  deffunt  son  mary  et  quelle  accuse  la 
verite  de  tout  ce  quelle  a  declare  cy  dessus.  sur  quoy  ladite  Cour 
aprouve  ladite  renonciation  et  ordonne  quelle  sortira  son  plain  Et 
Entier  Effet  Et  ladite  Lemire  sera  Bien  et  valablement  decharge 
de  toutes  debtes  de  ladite  Communaute  Et  autres  quil  peut  avoir 
Contracte  tant  avant  quapres  led*  mariage.  la  Cour  alouant  a 
ladite  veuve  les  deux  cent  livres  qui  se  trouvent  Entre  les  mains 
dud*  francois  Biguier  pere  dud*  deffunt  p'^  luy  tenir  lieu  de  douaire 
Et  de  preciput  au  payement  de  laqeulle  somme  led*  francois  Big- 
uier sera  Contraint  Et  avons  sign^  les  d*  jour  et  an  et  ladite  veuve 
fait  sa  marque  ord'*®  ne  sachant  signer  lesd*  jour  et  an. 

marque  de        + 

marie  Joseph  Lemire  J  B  H  LaCroix. 


a  une  Cour  du  deux  avril  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  sept. 
Jean  B*®  LaCroix  Presidant        Joseph  Lapensee 
antoine  girardin  Mathieu  Saucier 

Louis  chatel  Magistrats 

Le  S'"  JOSEPH  Labuxiere  procureur  aux  biens  vacants  Chargd 

de  la  Sucession  de  raphael  gagne  demandeur  Contre  Joseph 

PouPART  habitant  deffendeur 

1  Where  the  coutume  ruled  in  France,  the  community  of  goods  between  husband  and 
wife  was  created  by  marriage.  There  were  several  forms  of  this  marital  association  under 
French  law,  but  the  simpler  form  of  the  commtinautS  universellc  prevailed  among  the  French 
settlers  in  America.  The  properties  of  the  husband  and  wife  were  united  in  a  common  fund, 
which  was  responsible  for  all  debts  contracted  by  either  party  before  or  after  marriage.  There 
was  thus  created  by  maniage  a  tenancy  in  common.  Although  the  husband  was  the  head  of 
the  community,  the  sale  or  purchase  of  property  was  made  in  the  name  of  both  parties  custom- 
arily, and  this  is  the  usual  form  found  in  the  private  instruments  among  the  Illinois  records. 
By  the  contract  of  marriage  all  property  possessed  or  to  be  acquired  in  the  future  was  mutually 
given  to  each  other  by  the  contracting  parties,  so  that  in  case  no  child  was  bom  —  a  condi- 
tion always  mentioned  —  the  survivor  would  have  all  the  property  of  the  community.  This 
act  made  the  community  of  goods  into  a  conditional  joint  tenancy.  In  case  of  the  birth  of  a  child, 
the  widow  possessed  as  her  right  in  the  community  a  life  interest  in  half  the  common  property. 
The  community  of  goods  was  frequently  continued  after  the  death  of  one  of  the  parties  during  the 
minority  of  the  children.    On  account  of  the  early  marriages  of  the  widows  in  the  frontier  com- 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1787  273 

which  descended  from  the  estate  of  his  mother,  to  replace  the  dower 
and  jointure,  accorded  her  by  her  contract  of  marriage  with  the  said 
Francois  Biguier  called  Grosl^.  And  she  has  asked  for  a  certifi- 
cate of  this  declaration  and  renunciation,  which  the  Court  has 
granted  to  her  upon  her  making  oath  that  she  had  nothing,  drawn 
from  the  effects  belonging  to  the  said  deceased,  her  husband, 
and  by  which  she  acknowledges  the  truth  of  all  she  has  declared 
above.  Whereupon  the  said  Court  approves  the  said  renuncia- 
tion and  decrees  that  it  shall  have  its  complete  and  full  effect  and 
the  said  Lemire  shall  be  truly  and  validly  discharged  from  all 
d^bts  of  the  said  community  and  others  which  may  have  been 
contracted  as  well  before  as  after  the  said  marriage.  And  the 
Court  allows  the  said  widow  the  two  hundred  livres^  which  are  in 
the  hands  of  the  said  Francois  Biguier,  father  of  the  said  deceased, 
to  replace  the  dower  and  jointure,  to  the  payment  of  which  the 
said  Francois  Biguier  shall  be  constrained.^  And  we  have  signed 
the  said  day  and  year,  and  the  said  widow  made  her  mark,  not 
knowing  how  to  sign,  the  said  day  and  year. 

Mark  of  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

+ 
Marie  Joseph  Lemire. 

At  a  Court,  April  2,  1787. 
Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President       Joseph  Lapanc^ 
Antoine  Girardin  Matthieu  Saucier. 

Louis  Chatel. 
M.  Joseph  Labuxiere,  attorney  for  the  property  in  abeyance 
of  the  estate  of  Raphael  Gagne,  plaintiff,  vs.  Joseph  Poupar, 
citizen,  defendant. 

Heard  the  plaintiff  in  his  explanatory  petition  which  shows  that 
the  said  Poupar  owes  the  said  estate  a  sum  of  fourteen  hundred 
and  nineteen  livres  in  money  or  peltries  according  to  his  note  which 

munity,  this  caused  complexity  in  the  property  rights  of  the  families.  In  the  above  case  the 
widow  found  that  the  succession  to  the  community  of  goods  would  be  more  burdensome  than 
profitable,  and  therefore  she  appeared  before  the  Court  and  made  formal  renunciation  thereof. 
She  thus  escaped  from  all  responsibility  for  the  debts  of  the  community.  This,  however,  did  not 
annulher  rights  in  her  husband's  property,  for  by  the  renunciation  of  her  rights  to  the  community, 
she  had  revived  her  dower  rights,  amounting  to  a  half  or  a  third  of  her  husband's  property.  Since 
the  parents  of  her  husband  participated  in  making  the  contract  of  marriage  by  giving  their 
consent  thereto,  the  widow  acquired  a  life  interest  in  their  property  to  the  amount  of  her  dower. 
De  Ferriere,  Coutume  de  Paris,  iii.,  2  et  seq.;  Viollet,  Hist,  du  droit  civil  Franfais,  771  et  seq. 


274  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

ouy  le  demandeur  en  sa  requete  expositive  que  led*  poupart  doit 
a  ladite  Sucession  une  somme  de  quatorze  cent  dix  neuf  livres  en 
argent  ou  pelterie  suivant  son  Billet  Echii  depuis  plus  de  dix  huit 
mois.  que  la  Sucession  doit  a  plusieurs  particuliers  qui  reclament 
leurs  Creances  que  lancan  ayant  Et6  fait  a  deux  ans  de  Credy  le 
demandeur  n'a  aucun  fond  pour  payer,  quil  a  fait  plusieurs 
requisition  au  deffendeur  de  payer  Sans  avoir  p^  obtenir  de  luy  le 
payement  a  cette  fin  Coucluant  a  ce  quil  soit  condamn^  a  payer  le 
restant  de  son  Billet  montant  a  ladite  somme  de  quatorze  Cent 
dixneuf  livres,  Et  aux  frais  Et  depens  et  interest. 

ouy  le  deffendeur  qui  a  dit  quil  reconnoit  devoir  la  Somme  de 
quatorze  cent  vingt  neuf  livres  mais  quil  na  aucun  moyen  de  payer 
actuellement  ne  se  voyant  pas  En  sutsiation  [sic].  Sur  quoy  la  Cour 
a  surcit  le  payement  jusques  au  mois  doctobre  prochain  en  payant 
Linterest  a  Cinq  p^  Cent  sur  laquelle  somme  le  deffendeur  a  pay^ 
Compte  celle  detroiscent  soixante  dix  neuf  livres  Cinq  sols  En- 
doss^  sur  son  obligation  ce  dit  jour  donne  aux  Cahos  lesd*  jour 
Et  an  +  En  un  memoire  quil  a  produit. 
a  la  meme  Cour. 
Mathieu  saucier  demandeur  contre  B^^  La  Becasse  deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  a  produit  un  Billet  contre  le  deffendeur  de  la 
somme  de  Cinq  Cent  livres  Echus  depuis  un  an  En  demandant  le 
payement  Sans  delais.  le  deffendeur  a  reconnu  le  billet  Et  a  dit 
navoir  aucun  moyen  de  payer  a  present  quil  le  payeroit  quand  il 
auroit  de  quoy. 

Sur  quoy  la  Cour  a  ordonn^  Et  a  condamne  le  deffendeur  a 
payer  au  demandeur  le  montant  de  Son  obligation  dans  le  cour 
doctobre  prochain  a  quoy  faire  il  sera  contraint  par  saisie  Et 
vente  de  Ses  Biens  privilegierement.  donn^  En  Cour  lesd* 
jour  Et  an. 

a  la  meme  cour. 

M^  AUGUSTiN  DUBUQUE  demandeur  contre  Thom  Bredy 
deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  reclame  la  Somme  de  douze  Cent  trois  livres 
onze  sols  quatre  deniers  pour  marchandises  quil  luy  a  fourni  p*" 
son  Commerce  avec  linterest  frais  et  depens. 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1787  275 

matured  more  than  eighteen  months  ago;  and  that  the  estate 
owes  several  persons  who  are  claiming  their  dues;  and  that,  since 
the  auction  of  the  property  had  given  two  years  credit,  the  plaintiff 
has  no  other  fund  from  which  to  pay;  that  he  has  made  several 
demands  upon  the  defendant  to  pay  without  being  able  to  obtain 
the  payment  from  him;  therefore  he  concludes  that  the  defendant 
should  be  condemned  to  pay  the  balance  of  his  note  amounting 
to  the  said  sum  of  fourteen  hundred  and  nineteen  livres  and  the 
costs,  charges  and  interest. 

Heard  the  defendant,  who  said  that  he  acknowledged  that  he 
owed  the  simi  of  fourteen  hundred  and  twenty-nine  [nineteen?] 
livres,  but  that  he  had  no  means  to  pay  at  present,  not  finding  him- 
self in  position  to  pay.  Whereupon  the  Court  suspended  the  pay- 
ment until  the  month  of  October  next,  and  decreed  that  interest 
at  five  per  cent  be  paid.  On  this  sum  the  defendant  paid  this  day 
an  installment  of  three  hundred  and  seventy-nine  livres  five  sols, 
endorsed  on  his  obligation.  Given  at  Cahokia  the  said  day  and 
year  on  a  memorandum  which  he  produced. 

At  the  same  Court. 
Matthieu  Saucier,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Bte.  Labecasse,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  produced  a  note  against  the  defendant  for  the  sum 
of  five  hundred  livres,  matured  a  year  ago,  and  demands  the 
payment  of  it  without  delay.  The  defendant  acknowledged  the 
note  and  said  that  he  had  no  means  at  present,  and  that  he  would 
pay  when  he  had  means. 

Whereupon  the  Court  decreed  and  condemned  the  defendant 
to  pay  to  the  plaintiff  the  amount  of  his  obligation  in  the  course 
of  October  next;  to  do  which  he  shall  be  constrained  by  seizure 
and  sale  of  his  property  with  preference.  Given  in  Court  the 
said  day  and  year. 

At  the  same  Court. 
M.  AuGUSTiN  Dubuque,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Tom  Brady,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  claims  the  sum  of  twelve  hundred  and  three 
livres  eleven  sols  four  deniers  with  interest,  costs  and  charges  for 
merchandise,  which  he  furnished  him  for  his  trade. 

Heard  the  defendant,  who  said  that  he  did  not  owe  this  entire 


276  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

ouy  le  deffendeur  qui  a  dit  quil  ne  devoit  pas  cette  somme  en 
Entier  et  quil  navoit  pas  de  quoy  la  payer  actuellement,  qua  la 
permiere  demande  de  M^  dubuque  il  avoit  voulu  luy  hypotequer 
des  effets  p''  surete  de  ce  quil  pouvoit  luy  devoir  mais  que  led^  s^ 
dubuque  Navoit  pas  voulu  les  accepter  dans  le  temps,  que  pour  le 
present  son  epouse  ne  le  vouloit  plus,  quelle  vouloit  Rendre 
compte  a  Ses  Enfans  auparavant,  quil  ne  desavouet  pas  de  devoir 
au  s^  dubuc  Mais  quil  demandoit  un  delais  en  faisant  son  obliga- 
tion. 

Sur  quoy  la  Cour  a  condamn^  le  defifendeur  a  payer  au  demand- 
eur  le  montant  de  ce  quil  doit  aud*  s^  dubuc  Et  ce  sans  delais  a 
quoy  faire  quil  soit  contraint  par  saisie  Et  vente  des  meubles  et 
effets  qui  apartiennent  directement  aud^  Thorn  Bredy  sur  lesquels 
led*  S^  dubuc  aura  privilege.  Sans  derroger  au  privilege  et  pre- 
ferance  que  les  Enfans  de  laflame  on  sur  ceux  dud*  deffendeur 
Lesquels  Biens  du  deffendeur.  En  cas  que  preferance  Nait  lieu 
p^  les  mineurs  laflame  Seront  estimez  et  aura  le  Choix  led*  s^  dubuc 
de  les  prendre  au  prix  de  lestimation  ou  de  accorder  un  delais. 
condamnons  led*  Thom  Bredy  aux  frais  Et  depens  qui  seront 
avances  par  le  s^  dubuq. 

delivre  copie  p""  signifier  a  thom  Bredy. 
a  la  meme  cour. 
p^^  MARTIN  demandeur  contre  le  S'"  augustin  dubuc  deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  reclame  contre  le  deffendeur  un  memoire  de 
fournitures  p^  Loyer  de  Cloison  fournitures  de  Madriers  planches 
et  Cloux  rnontant  a  deux  cent  vingt  Cinq  livres  dix  sols  En  argent 
Lesquels  fournitures  il  luy  a  fait  a  Sa  demande. 

ouy  le  deffendeur  qui  declare  avoir  Emprunte  la  Cloison  Sans 
luire  [sic]  ni  meme  sans  parler  de  loyer,  Et  que  les  Conventions 
Etoient  de  luy  remetre  la  Cloison  En  meme  Etat  quelle  Etoit  lors 
quil  la  pretee  lauthomne.  Et  comme  il  avoit  recommande  a  M^ 
tabault  de  faire  remetre  la  Cloison  il  a  dit  au  deffendeur  quil  avoit 

1  The  wife  of  Thomas  Brady  was  a  Madame  Laflamme,  whose  children  by  her  first  hus- 
band had  rights  in  the  community  of  goods  estabhshed  by  her  marriage  with  their  father  and 
which  had  not  been  ended  by  a  division  of  the  property,  when  she  formed  the  second  com- 
munity of  goods  with  Brady.  Madame  Brady  now  desired  to  settle  with  her  children  before 
the  community  of  goods  with  Brady  became  responsible  for  the  debts  owing  Dubuque;  but  the 
Court  gave  judgment  against  that  property  which  had  been  brought  to  the  community  by  Brady. 

2  Note  in  margin  by  the  clerk. 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1787  277 

sum,  and  that  he  did  not  have  means  to  pay  at  present;  that 
at  the  tune  of  the  first  demand  of  M.  Dubuque,  he  had  wished 
to  give  him  a  mortgage  on  his  effects  for  surety  for  that  which 
he  might  owe  him;  but  that  the  said  M.  Dubuque  had  not  been 
willing  to  accept  them  at  the  time,  and  that  now  his  (the  defend-^ 
ant's)  wife  was  no  longer  willing,  and  that  she  wished  to  render 
account  to  her  children  first;  that  he  did  not  disavow  his  debt  to 
M.  Dubuque,  but  that  he  asked  for  a  delay  in  fulfilling  his  obli- 
gation. 

Whereupon  the  Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay  to  the 
plaintiff  the  amount  of  what  he  owed  the  said  M.  Dubuque  and 
that  without  delay;  and  the  Court  decreed  that  he  should  be  con- 
strained to  do  this  by  seizure  and  sale  of  the  personal  property 
belonging  directly  to  the  said  Tom  Brady,  on  which  the  said 
M.  Dubuque  shall  have  preference,  without  derogating  from  the 
privilege  and  preference,  which  the  children  of  Laflamme  have  on 
the  property  of  the  said  defendant.^  In  case  the  minor  heirs  of 
Laflamme  have  no  right  of  preference,  this  property  of  the  defend- 
ant shall  be  appraised  and  the  said  M.  Dubuque  shall  have  the 
choice  of  taking  it  at  the  appraised  value  or  of  granting  a  delay. 
We  condemn  the  said  Tom  Brady  to  pay  the  costs  and  charges, 
which  shall  be  advanced  by  M.  Dubuque. 

Delivered  a  copy  for  notification  to  Tom  Brady. ^ 
Pierre  Martin,  Plaintiff,  vs.  M.  Augustin  Dubuque, 
Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  claims  payment  from  the  defendant  of  a  bill  for 
supplies,  namely  for  rent  of  partition,  supplies  of  joists,  planks 
and  nails  amounting  to  two  hundred  and  twenty-five  livres  ten 
sols  in  money,  which  supplies  he  furnished  the  defendant  at  his 
request. 

Heard  the  defendant,  who  declares  that  he  had  borrowed  the 
partition  without  renting  or  even  speaking  of  rent;  and  that  the 
agreement  was  that  he  return  the  partition  to  the  plaintiff  in  the 
same  condition  it  was  when  the  latter  lent  it  in  the  autumn ;  and 
as  he  had  ordered  M.  Tabeau  to  have  the  partition  returned, 
he  told  the  plaintiff  that  he  had  made  arrangements  with  Troge 


278  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

pris  des  arrangement  avec  troge  p'"  la  remetre  telle  quelle  Etoit  Et 
comme  il  y  avoit  quelques  planches  qui  avoient  Et^  rogn^s  il  devoit 
luy  En  remetre  dautres  ou  saranger  avec  martin  quil  Etoit  juste 
que  si  la  Cloison  navoit  pas  Et^  Remise  comme  m'"  martin  sen 
plain  il  faut  quelle  soit  remise  En  sa  Nature  par  troge  ou  par  ceux 
qui  ont  les  fonds  de  la  society. 

Le  tout  examine  par  la  Cour  Elle  a  Condamn^  Et  condamne 
le  s^  dubuque  a  payer  Sans  delais  aud^  pierre  martin  la  Somme  de 
Cent  trente  Cinq  Hvres  dix  sols  pour  le  montant  de  son  memoire 
a  laquelle  nous  lavons  reduit  sauf  le  recour  dud*  s^  dubuque  sur 
la  societe  condamne  le  s^  dubuque  aux  fi-ais  Et  depens. 
Michel  Charly  demandeur  contre  Francois  gramont  deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  Reclame  contre  le  deffendeur  dix  livres  pour  la 
bedauderie  qui  luy  sont  dus  p^  lannde  derniere  1786  p^  la  maison 
du  deffendeur. 

Le  deffendeur  a  dit  quil  avoit  vendu  sa  maison  des  le  24  7^^® 
dernier  que  dailleur  il  ny  demeuroit  pas  quil  demeuroit  ch^s  M^ 
LaCroix. 

La  Cour  a  condamne  le  S^  gramont  a  payer  au  demandeur  Sept 
livres  dix  sols  p^  sa  part  de  la  bedauderie  jusqua  la  fin  de  Septem- 
bre  dernier  Et  condamne  M^  charles  cadron  a  luy  payer  Cin- 
quante  sols  p^  les  trois  derniers  mois  de  1786.  condamne  la  Suces- 
sion  de  deffunt  gramont  aux  depens  liquidez  a  quinze  livres  donne 
En  Cour  lesd*  jour  Et  an. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
JOSEPH  AMELIN  demandant  contre  henry  Kertis  dit  Bienvenu 

Le  demandeur  a  produit  un  Certifficat  du  Nomm^  Maillet,  Et 
Chevalier,  vize  par  m^  Cruzat  commandant  a  S*  Louis  par  lequel 
il  apert  que  led*  maillet  Etoit  Charge  dune  obligation  de  Neuf  cent 
Soixante  neuf  livres  En  pelterie  Et  quil  a  perdti  ladite  obligation 
suivant  led*  Certifficat  quil  donne  p^  tenir  lieu  dobligation  declar- 
ant quil  na  Rien  recu  dessus.  ladite  obligation  due  par  led* 
Joseph  Kertis  dit  Bienventi  icy  present  a  la  Cour  Requerant  que 
led*  Kertis  dit  Bienventi  ait  a  luy  En  payer  le  montant  Et  aux 
frais  Et  depens. 

1  See  case  somewhat  similar  on  p.  239. 


i 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1787  279 

to  return  it  in  the  same  condition  it  was;  and  since  there  were 
some  planks  which  had  been  cut  off,  he  ought  to  return  others  for 
them  or  make  arrangements  with  Martin.  He  said  that  it  was 
just,  if  the  partition  had  not  been  returned,  as  M.  Martin  makes 
complaint,  that  it  should  be  returned  in  good  condition  by  Troge 
or  by  those  who  have  the  funds  of  the  partnership. 

All  having  been  examined  by  the  Court  it  condemns  and  does 
condemn  M.  Dubuque  to  pay  without  delay  to  the  said  Pierre 
Martin  the  sum  of  one  hundred  and  thirty-five  livres  ten  sols  the 
amount  of  his  bill,  to  which  sum  we  have  reduced  it,  reserving  to 
the  said  M,  Dubuque  recourse  against  the  partnership.  Con- 
demned M.  Dubuque  to  pay  the  costs  and  charges. 
Michel  Charly,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Francois  Grandmont,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  claims  from  the  defendant  ten  livres  for  the  bead- 
lery,  which  are  due  on  the  house  of  the  defendant  for  last  year,  1786. 

The  defendant  said  that  he  had  sold  his  house  the  24th  of  last 
September,  and  that  besides  he  did  not  live  there,  but  at  M.  La- 
Croix.^ 

The  Court  condemned  M.  Grandmont  to  pay  to  the  plaintiff 
seven  livres  ten  sols  for  his  share  of  the  beadlery  up  to  the  end  of 
September  last;  and  condemns  M.  Charles  Cadron  to  pay  him 
fifty  sols  for  the  three  last  months  of  1786;  and  condemns  the 
estate  of  the  deceased  Grandmont  to  pay  the  costs  which  are  set 
at  fifteen  livres.     Given  in  Court  the  said  day  and  year. 

At  the  same  Court. 
Joseph  Hamelin,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Henry  Kertis  called  Bienvenu. 

The  plaintiff  produced  a  certificate  of  the  named  Mailhet  and 
Chevalier,  signed  by  M.  Cruzat,  commandant  at  St.  Louis,  accord- 
ing to  which  it  appears  that  the  said  Mailhet  was  intrusted  with 
a  note  for  nine  hundred  and  sixty-nine  livres  in  peltries  and  that 
he  lost  the  said  note,  according  to  the  said  certificate,  which  he 
gives  to  take  the  place  of  the  note;  and  he  declares  that  he  has  re- 
ceived nothing  upon  the  said  obligation  owed  by  the  said  Joseph 
Kertis  called  Bienvenu,  here  present  in  Court;  and  he  prays  that 
the  said  Kertis  called  Bienvenu  be  held  to  pay  him  the  amount 
with  costs  and  charges. 


28o  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

ouy  le  deSendeur  qui  a  recuse  le  Certifficat  et  qui  a  dit  quil  ne 
devoit  qua  son  Billet  que  Ion  N'avoit  qua  le  luy  presenter  quil 
offroit  de  le  payer  quil  declaroit  ne  pouvoit  le  payer  autrement 
quil  pouvoit  luy  etre  presente  a  missilimakinac  ou  ailleiurs  Et  quil 
seroit  oblige  de  le  payer,  quil  avoit  donn^  ordre  au  s'"  Louis  gaud 
de  retirer  de  largent  ou  pelterie  du  s^  maillet  mais  que  maillet 
avoit  repondu  quil  avoit  a  produire  des  debtes  aud*  Bienvenii  que 
cest  peut  Etre  led*  Billet  dont  est  question,  quil  ne  devoit  Rien 
aud*  maillet  dailleurs. 

La  Cour  a  daboutee  le  demandeur  de  Ses  demandes  jusques  a  ce 
quil  ait  produit  Le  Billet  en  question  la  Condamne  aux  frais  Et 
depens  liquidez  a  quinze  livres  donne  en  Cour  lesd*  jour  Et  an. 

delivre  i  copie  a  hamelin  5^^ 
M^  Myer  Michael  demandeur  contre  Pierre  troge  deffendeur 
nayant  voulu  paroitre  apres  avoir  Ete  assigne. 

Le  demandeur  a  presente  deux  billets  a  luy  dus  par  le  deffen- 
deur lun  de  la  somme  de  deux  Cent  Cinquante  deux  livres  dix  sols 
En  argent  Et  lautre  de  Cent  Cinquante  formant  les  deux  sommes 
celle  de  quatre  Cent  deux  livres  deduction  faite  des  acompte  Reste 
trois  cent  Cinquante  six  livres  Sept  sols  qui  le  demandeur  requiere 
que  led*  troge  luy  paye  sans  delais  avec  les  frais  et  depens. 

La  Cour  atendu  que  led*  troge  na  voulu  paroitre  apr&  avoir 
Ete  apelle  trois  fois  a  la  porte  de  lalidience  la  Condamne  a  payer 
au  demandeur  la  dite  somme  de  trois  cent  Cinquante  six  livres 
Sept  sols.  Et  ce  sans  delais  sauf  aud*  troge  de  donner  des 
surete  au  demandeur  sil  veut  obtenir  du  terme  Et  la  Condamne 
aux  frais  liquidez  a  quinze  livres  qui  seront  avancez  par  le  de- 
mandeur Et  a  luy  rembourcez  par  le  deffendeur  donnd  En  Cour. 

La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  premier  May  prochain  ce  2  avril  1787. 

J  B  H  LaCroix  Pr  Sdt. 

1  Note  in  margin  by  the  clerk. 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1787  281 

Heard  the  defendant,  who  took  exception  to  the  certificate  and 
who  said  that  he  owed  only  for  his  note ;  that  one  had  only  to  pre- 
sent it  to  him;  that  he  offered  to  pay  it;  that  he  declared  he  could 
not  pay  it  otherwise ;  that  it  might  be  presented  to  him  at  Michil- 
limackinac  or  elsewhere  and  that  he  would  be  bound  to  pay  it; 
that  he  had  given  orders  to  M.  Louis  Gaud  to  withdraw  money 
or  peltries  from  M.  Mailhet;  but  that  Mailhethad  answered  that 
he  had  to  give  particulars  of  the  debts  to  the  said  Bienvenu,  and 
that  perhaps  that  is  the  said  note  in  question ;  that  he  owed  noth- 
ing to  the  said  Mailhet  otherwise. 

The  Court  denied  the  prayers  of  the  plaintiff  until  he  should 
have  exhibited  the  note  in  question;  and  condemned  him  to  pay 
the  costs  and  charges,  which  were  set  at  fifteen  livres.  Given  in 
Court  the  said  day  and  year. 

Delivered  a  copy  to  Amelin,  5  livres} 
M.  Myer  Michaels,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Troge,  Defendant, 

who  was  unwilling  to  appear  after  having  been  summoned. 

The  plaintiff  presented  two  notes  due  him  by  the  defendant, 
one  for  the  sum  of  two  hundred  and  fifty-two  livres  ten  sols  in 
money  and  the  other  for  one  hundred  and  fifty,  the  two  amounting 
to  four  hundred  and  two  livres.  After  deduction  for  the  install- 
ments made,  there  remain  three  hundred  and  fifty-six  livres  seven 
sols,  which  the  plaintiff  demands  that  the  said  Troge  pay  him 
without  delay,  with  costs  and  charges. 

The  Court,  considering  that  the  said  Troge  did  not  wish  to 
appear  after  having  been  summoned  three  times  at  the  door  of  the 
audience  chamber,  condemned  him  to  pay  to  the  plaintiff  the  said 
sum  of  three  hundred  and  fifty-six  livres  seven  sols^  and  that  with- 
out delay,  reserving  to  the  said  Troge  the  right  to  give  surety  to 
the  plaintiff,  if  he  wishes  to  obtain  terms;  and  condemned  him  to 
pay  costs,  which  were  set  at  fifteen  livres^  which  shall  be  advanced 
by  the  plaintiff  and  reimbursed  to  him  by  the  defendant.  Given 
in  Court. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  first  of  May  next,  this  second  day 
of  April,  1787. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 


282  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  premier  May  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt  Sept. 
]VF^  jean  B*^  LaCroix  Presidant      Mathieu  Saucier 
Louis  Chalet  Joseph  Lapensee 

magistrats 
le  S'"  JEAN  DUMOULIN  demaudeur  contre  augustin  dubuq  def- 

fendeur 
Le  demandeur  reclame  une  Somme  de  deux  Cent  dix  neuf 
livres  dix  sols  En  argent  p^  plusieurs  articles  port^s  au  compte  quil 
a  Produit  devant  la  Cour  concluant  a  ce  que  le  defifendeur  luy 
paye  ladite  Somme  Et  aux  frais  Et  depens,  demandant  a  Etre 
dechargd  du  payement  des  Clostures  que  les  adjudicataires  avoient 
fait  Sur  les  terres  de  la  mission,  dautant  que  les  dites  terres  ont 
Et^  reprises  par  la  fabrique. 

Le  deffendeur  repond  que  les  Conventions  faites  avec  M*" 
Dumoulin  Etoit  de  luy  donner  le  dix  p^  cent  sur  toutes  les  sommes 
quil  recevoit  de  la  vente  des  Biens  a  la  charge  de  payer  les  frais  de 
Criees  Et  que  ce  dix  p'"  cent  devoit  etre  partage  Entre  led*  S^ 
dumoulin  Et  le  s^  Labuxiere  p""  les  Ecritures  quil  feroit  mais  que 
nen  ayant  point  fait  le  S^  Labuxiere  ne  demandoit  Rien,  Et  que 
Comme  la  fabrique  a  repris  les  Biens  de  ladite  mission  le  deffend- 
eur demandoit  a  Etre  decharge  du  payement  quexige  M^  du 
Moulin  p^  son  recononcment  [sic]. 

Sur  quoy  vti  les  contestations  des  parties  Et  Nay  ant  voulu 
Sen  raporter  a  un  arbitrage  La  Cour  a  Nomme  les  jures  cy  apres 
pour  decider  de  leur  affaires,  savoir 

M'^  Myer  Michaels  Morel 

helene  hugues  huvard 

Largeau  Jacq  LaCroix 

Laurant  ducharme  Belle     , 

Courtois  Kaorn 

Wouel  p^e  Billet 

donne  en  Cour  le  i^^  may  1787. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
Le   S^  AUGUSTIN  DUBUQUE  demaudeuT  contre   pierre  martin 

deffendeur 
Sur  le  proces  entreux  devant  la  cour  du  deux  davril  dernier  le 
s'"  dubuq  a  dit  navoir  Rien  promis  a  martin  p^  loyer  de  sa  Cloison 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1787  283 

At  a  Court,  May  i,  1787. 
MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President.      Matthieu  Saucier. 
Louis  Chatel.  Joseph  Lapance. 

Magistrates . 
M.  Jean  Dumoulin,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Augustin  Dubuque,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  claims  a  sum  of  two  hundred  and  nineteen  livres 
ten  sols  in  money  for  several  items  carried  on  the  account  which 
he  exhibited  to  the  Court  and  he  concludes  that  the  defendant 
should  pay  him  the  said  sum  with  costs  and  charges;  and  he  prays 
that  he  be  released  from  the  payment  for  closing  up  the  accounts, 
which  the  purchasers  made  on  the  lands  of  the  mission,  inasmuch 
as  the  said  lands  have  been  taken  back  by  the  vestry-board. 

The  defendant  answers  that  the  agreement  with  M.  Dumoulin 
was  to  give  him  ten  per  cent  on  all  the  sums  which  he  received  from 
the  sale  of  the  property,  on  condition  that  he  pay  the  costs  of  the 
auction ;  and  that  this  ten  per  cent  was  to  be  divided  between  the 
said  M.  Dumoulin  and  M.  Labuxiere  for  the  deeds  which  the 
latter  should  make,  but  since  he  had  made  none,  M.  Labuxiere 
demanded  nothing;  and  that  since  the  vestry-board  had  taken 
the  property  of  the  said  mission,  the  defendant  demanded  that 
he  be  released  from  the  payment  which  M.  Dumoulin  exacts  for 
his  renunciation. 

Whereupon,  because  of  the  contests  of  the  parties  and  since 
they  are  unwilling  to  submit  to  an  arbitration,  the  Court  named 
the  following  jurors  to  decide  their  cause,  to  wit: 
MM.  Myer  Michaels.  Morel. 

Helene.  Jacques  LaCroix. 

Largeau.  Bell. 

Laurent  DuCharme.  Cahom. 

Hugues  He  ward.  Courtois. 

Wouel.  Pierre  Billet. 

Given  in  Court  May  ist,  1787. 

At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Augustin  Dubuque,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Martin, 
Defendant. 
In  the  suit  between  them  before  the  Court  the  second  of  last 
April,  M.  Dubuque  said  that  he  had  promised   Martin  nothing 


284  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

et  quil  luy  a  seulement  dit  quil  la  luy  feroit  Remetre  au  meme  Etat. 
Martin  a  dit  quil  luy  avoit  promis  un  loyer  Et  quil  seroit  Contant 
mais  que  au  lieu  de  suivre  ces  conventions  il  a  gaste  Ses  planches 
et  sa  Cloison  ainsi  que  plusieurs  Madriers  au  [  ?]  plancher  den  has 
qui  manquent  demandant  que  le  tout  luy  soit  paye  par  led*  S^ 
dubuq  suivant  le  memoire  quil  produit  Et  quil  ofre  de  produire  p^ 
temoin  le  S^  paul  poupart  a  linstant  le  S^  paul  poupart  est 
comparu  auquel  nous  avons  fait  faire  sermant  de  dire  la  verite 
Et  a  dit  quil  Navoit  aucunne  connoissance  que  le  s^  du- 
buque  luy  avoit  promis  du  loyer  quil  ne  lavoit  pas  Entendu. 
Le  S^  dubuque  a  produit  le  S^  troge  qui  apres  avoir  fait  sermant 
a  declare  quil  avoit  pose  par  ordre  de  M''  tabaud  la  Cloison 
de  martin  mais  que  en  ayant  fait  une  partie  il  luy  a  demand^  de 
luy  faire  une  Equiere,  quil  la  aussi  faite  par  ordre  du  M^  tabault  et 
que  led*^  martin  la  Cloison  faite  navoit  Rien  dit  apres  la  cloison 
faite. 

Sur  quoy  la  Cour  ne  pouvant  decider  a  renvoye  les  parties  a  Se 
pourvoir  pardevant  des  arbitres. 

B*^   DUMAY  demandeur  contre  jean  B*^  Baron  deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  conclud  a  ce  que  le  deffendeur  luy  paye  la  somme 
de  Cent  quatre  vingt  dix  sept  livres  dix  sols  Sur  quoy  il  a  recu  la 
s^  de  Cent  livres  reste  quatre  vingt  dix  sept  livres  dix  sols  quil 
demande  que  led*  baron  luy  paye  Sans  delais. 

Sur  quoy  les  parties  Se  Sont  arrangees. 
FRANCOIS  GEROSME  demaudeur  contre  Joseph  Biguier  dit  grosle 

deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  demande  au  deffendeur  Soixante  trois  Boulins 
dune  Cabanne  que  led*  deft'endeur  a  Emprunte  de  la  femme  dud* 
gerosme  quil  ait  a  les  luy  remetre  de  la  meme  grandeur  et  grosseur 
Et  aux  frais  Et  depens. 

Led*  grosle  a  repondu  quil  ne  devoit  point  de  bois  aud*  gerosme 
Et  quil  navoit  aucun  afaire  avec  luy  que  Setoit  son  fils  qui  avoit 
emprunte  du  bois  quil  pouvoit  saranger  avec  luy  a  linstant  est 

1  Boulins.  This  probably  means  the  upright  posts,  grooved  on  two  sides,  which  the 
French  used  in  building  their  houses.  These  posts  were  set  in  the  ground  a  few  inches  apart 
with  the  grooved  sides  together.  The  space  thus  left  v>'as  filled  with  "cat  and  clay''  —  the 
rat  being  finely  cut  straw  or  moss  —  and  the  grooves  prevented  the  filling  from  falling  out. 
See  illustration  of  a  typical  house  of  this  description  on  opposite  page. 


r' 


»? 


f*,:' 
•'■I 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1787  285 

for  rent  of  his  partition;  that  he  only  said  that  he  would  have  it 
returned  to  him  in  the  same  condition.  Martin  said  that  Du- 
buque had  promised  him  a  rent  and  that  he  would  be  contented; 
but  instead  of  keeping  these  agreements  he  had  spoiled  his  boards 
and  his  partition  as  well  as  several  joists  in  the  lower  floor  [?] 
which  are  missing;  and  he  prays  that  all  be  paid  to  him  by  M.  Du- 
buque according  to  the  account  which  he  produces;  and  he  offers 
to  produce  Paul  Poupar  as  witness.  And  now  appeared  M. 
Paul  Poupar,  whom  we  have  made  take  oath  to  tell  the  truth,  and 
who  said  that  he  never  had  any  knowledge  that  M.  Dubuque 
had  promised  rent,  that  he  had  never  heard  of  it.  M.  Dubuque 
produced  Mr.  Troge  who,  after  having  taken  oath,  declared 
that  he  had  by  order  of  M.  Tabeau  put  Martin's  partition  in 
place;  but  that,  having  made  a  part  of  it,  the  latter  had  asked 
him  to  make  a  balustrade  for  him;  that  he  had  also  made  it  by 
order  of  Mr.  Tabeau;  and  that  the  said  Martin  had  said  nothing 
after  the  partition  was  made. 

Whereupon,  the  Court  not  being  able  to  decide  dismissed  the 
parties  to  sue  before  arbitrators. 

Bte.  Dumay  Plaintiff  vs.  Jean  Bte.  Baron  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  concludes  that  the  defendant  should  pay  him 
the  sum  of  one  hundred  and  ninety-seven  livres  ten  sols  upon 
which  he  has  received  the  sum  of  one  hundred  livres;  and  there 
remains  ninety-seven  livres  ten  sols  which  he  asks  that  the  said 
Baron  pay  him  without  delay. 

Whereupon  the  parties  came  to  an  agreement. 
Francois  Gerosme,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Joseph  Biguier  called  Grosle 

Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  demands  of  the  defendant  sixty-three  grooved 
posts*  for  a  cabin  which  the  said  defendant  borrowed  from  the 
wife  of  the  said  Gerosme;  and  he  says  that  he  ought  to  return  to 
him  some^  of  the  same  length  and  thickness,  and  pay  costs  and 
charges. 

The  said  Grosle  answered  that  he  owed  no  wood  to  the  said 
Gerosme  and  that  he  had  no  business  with  him;  that  it  was  his 
son  who  had  borrowed  the  wood  and  he  could  settle  with  him. 


286  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

intervenil  michel  peltier  lequel  apres  sermant  par  luy  fait  a  dit  que 
le  fils  de  grosle  luy  avoit  dit  quil  avoit  Eu  de  la  veuve  giroux  du 

J  B  H  LaCroix  pr  std. 
bois  p''  finir  Sa  maison  Et  quil  devoit  En  rendre  p^  finir  la  maison 
de  ladite  veuve  jusques  a  son  quarre  sur  quoy  a  deffaud  de  preuves 
sufisantes  la  Cour  a  renvoye  les  parties  a  Se  pourvoir  pardevant 
m^  girardin  command^  a  la  prairie  du  pont  Et  magistra  pour 
aranger  Les  parties. 

B^^  CHARTRAN  demandeur  contre  pierre  troge 

le  demandeur  reclame  la  somme  de  deux  cent  Cinquante  livres 
a  luy  duee  par  pierre  troge  s*  son  Billet  Echu  et  aux  frais  Et  depens. 
le  defPendeur  a  dit  navoir  point  de  quoy  payer  quil  ofroit  de  payer 
et  demdoit  [sic]  Credy  jusquapres  la  recolte  Et  donneroit  Cotion. 

Sur  quoy  la  Cour  a  accorde  aud*  troge  delais  jusqua  lundy 
prochain  pour  avoir  le  temps  de  vendre  sa  jument  p'"  payer  faute 
de  quoy  ladite  jument  sera  saisie  et  vendue  pour  payer  le  demand- 
eur et  au  Cas  quelle  ne  suffise  pas  Sera  Saisy  de  Ses  autres  meubles 
p^  finir  de  payer  condamnons  troge  aux  frais  qui  seront  avances  et 
payez  par  led*  Chartran. 
Le  S^  courtois  demandeur  contre  francois  Renousse  deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  reclame  la  somme  de  Cent  vingt  livres  Suivant 
Son  Billet  Echus.  a  lui  due  par  francois  Renousse  Et  aux  frais  Et 
depens. 

Led*  francois  Renousse  a  dit  navoir  point  de  quoy  payer 
actuellement.  la  Cour  a  Condamnd  Le  deffendeur  a  payer  si  mieux 
il  naime  sengager  pour  payer  au  prix  du  Cour  des  autres  condam- 
nons led*  Courtois  aux  frais. 

La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  premier  juin  1787. 

J  B  H  LaCroix  prsdt. 

^  At  the  bottom  of  the  page  and  evidently  signed  by  accident. 

2  Quarr6  or  carre  means  all  that  square  part  of  the  house  below  the  roof. 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1787  287 

Now  intervened  Michel  Pellctier  who,  after  taking  oath,  said  that 
the  spn  of  Grosld  had  said  to  him  that  he  had  obtained  from  the 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres.^ 
widow  Giroux  some  wood  to  finish  his  house;  and  that  he  was  to 
return  some  to  finish  the  house  of  the  said  widow  up  to  the  roof  .^ 
Whereupon  the  Court  in  default  of  sufficient  proofs  dismissed  the 
parties  to  sue  before  M.  Girardin,  commandant  and  magistrate  at 
Prairie  du  Pont,  who  will  adjust  the  difficulty  between  them. 
Bte.  Chartran,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Troge 

The  plaintiff  lays  claim  to  the  sum  of  two  hundred  and  fifty 
livres  due  him  by  Pierre  Troge  according  to  his  note,  which  is 
due,  with  costs  and  charges.  The  defendant  said  that  he  did  not 
have  the  means  to  pay,  that  he  offered  to  pay  and  demanded 
credit  until  after  harvest  and  would  give  surety. 

Whereupon  the  Court  granted  the  said  Troge  delay  until 
Monday  next  to  have  time  to  sell  his  mare  in  order  to  pay;  in 
default  of  which  the  said  mare  shall  be  seized  and  sold  to  pay 
the  plaintiff,  and  in  case  that  is  not  sufficient  there  shall  be  seized 
other  goods  to  complete  the  payment.  We  condemn  Troge  to 
pay  the  costs,  which  shall  be  advanced  and  paid  by  the  said 
Chartran. 

M.  CouRTOis,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Francois  Renoux,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  lays  claim  to  the  sum  of  one  hundred  and  twenty 
livres  according  to  the  note,  fallen  due,  which  is  owed  him  by 
Francois  Renoux,  with  costs  and  charges. 

The  said  Francois  Renoux  said  that  he  did  not  have  means  to 
pay  at  present.  The  Cofirt  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay,  un- 
less he  prefers  to  bind  himself  out  for  the  payment  at  the  current 
wage.    We  condemn  the  said  Courtois  to  pay  the  costs. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  first  of  June,  1787. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 


288  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  tenue  Extraordinairement  le  Sept  de  May  mil  sept 
cent  quatre  vingt  sept. 

M""^  Jean  B*^  LaCroix  presidant    Louis  Chatel 
ant.  girardin  Math.  Saucier 

Joseph  Lapens^e  magistra 

Entre  Jacob  groot  demandeur  contre  Jaques  Piquet  habitant 
du  grand  Ruisseau  deffendeur 
Declaration  dud*  Jacob  groot 
a  dit  que  lundy  dernier  trente  davril  il  Etoit  dans  Son  champ 
avec  Sa  femme  a  travailler.  que  Son  fils  aine  Etoit  venu  a  luy  pour 
luy  dire  que  Lenfant  de  M^  piquet  avoit  Ete  mordu  par  un  Chien 
au  visage  que  un  instant  apres  il  est  venu  a  leur  fort  avec  Sa  femme 
p^  voir  lenfant  que  sa  femme  luy  avoit  dit  quil  feroit  Bien  de  man- 
ger un  morceau  Et  quapres  il  iroit  voir  lenfant.  que  En  entrant 
dans  le  fort  il  a  entendu  dire  par  des  femmes  ou.  denfans  dont  il 
nest  pas  certain  que  Setoit  Son  Chien  qui  avoit  mordu  lenfant,  que 
apres  avoir  mange  luy  et  sa  feme  ont  voulu  sortir  pour  aler  voir 
lenfant  que  sortant  de  Sa  porte  il  a  vu  le  S'*  piquet  avec  Sa  Carabine 
a  la  main,  que  le  S^  piquet  les  voyant  sest  arrete  tout  cour  avec  le 
feu  dans  le  Visage  et  Changeant  de  Couleur  deux  ou  trois  fois, 
Enfin  tramblant  de  Colere  il  a  prononce  que  Croyez  vous  faire 
avec  votre  Chien,  le  S^  groot  a  repondu  quil  ne  savoit  point  mais 
que  si  Setoit  juste  que  Son  Chien  Eu  merite  la  morte  quil  le  feroit 
tuer,  led*  piquet  luy  a  repondu  si  vous  le  tuez  cela  mevitera  la 
peine  de  le  tuer  Et  dans  1  instant  Setant  retourne  il  a  apercu  le  Chien 
Et  la  Blesse  avec  Sa  Carabine  dont  il  est  mort  quelques  jour  apres, 
le  S^  piquet  a  reste  ou  il  a  tire  le  Chien  Et  a  recharge  Sa  Carabine, 
la  Femme  du  Deposant  voyant  cela  a  Sorti  a  la  porte  pour  faire 
Entrer  Ses  enfans  dans  Sa  maison.  Et  a  dit  que  le  —  vous  con- 
fonde  pour  quoy  navez  vous  pas  tues  le  Chien  Roide  Et  pourquoy 
cette  Garce  de  femme  qui  demeure  ches  vous  n'a  telle  pas  fait 
rester  Ses  Batard  a  la  maison  Et  que  si  Ses  Enfans  avoient  Etez 

1  In  the  session  of  March  7,  1789,  p.  362  the  names  Piquet  and  Piggott  are  used  to  desig- 
nate the  same  man. 

2  Several  American  families  lived  in  a  common  block-house  at  Grand  Ruisseau.  The 
houses  of  the  several  families  were  situated  within  the  stockade,  and  the  scenes  here  described 
by  the  different  Avitnesses  shift  from  one  of  the  private  houses  to  the  open  court.  For  an 
account  of  Grand  Ruisseau,  see  Introduction,  pp.  cxxii.,  cxlviii. 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1787  289 

At  a  Court  meeting  in  special  session,  May  7,  1787. 

MM.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President.     Louis  Chatel. 

Ant.  Girardin.  Matthieu  Saucier. 

Jos.  Lapanc^.  Magistrates. 

Jacob  Groot,  Plaintiff,  vs.  James  Piggott,  inhabitant  of  Grand 
Ruisseau,  Defendant.^ 
Declaration  of  the  said  Jacob  Groot. 

Said  that  on  Monday  last,  the  thirteenth  of  April,  while  he 
was  in  the  field  with  his  wife  working,  his  oldest  son  came  to 
him  and  said  that  the  child  of  M.  Piggott  had  been  bitten  in  the 
face  by  a  dog;  that  a  moment  after  he  went  to  the  blockhouse^ 
with  his  wife  to  see  the  child;  that  his  wife  had  said  to  him  that 
it  would  be  better  to  have  something  to  eat;  and  after  that  he 
might  go  to  see  the  child.  On  entering  into  the  blockhouse  he  had 
heard  some  women  or  children,  he  is  not  certain  which,  say  that 
it  was  his  dog  which  had  bitten  the  child;  that  after  having  eaten, 
he  and  his  wife  wished  to  go  out  and  see  the  child;  that  after  he 
went  out  of  his  door  he  saw  M.  Piggott  with  his  rifle  in  his  hand; 
that  M.  Piggott  upon  seeing  them  stopped  short  with  fire  in  his 
eyes  and  changed  color  two  or  three  times,  and  finally  trembling 
with  anger  uttered:  ''What  do  you  intend  to  do  with  your  dog  ?  " 
M.  Groot  answered  that  he  did  not  know;  but  that  if  it  was  true 
that  his  dog  had  merited  death,  he  would  have  him  killed.  The 
said  Piggott  answered:  "If  you  kill  him  that  will  spare  me  the 
trouble  of  killing  him",  and  at  the  same  moment  turning  around 
he  saw  the  dog  and  wounded  it  with  his  rifle  so  that  it  died  a  few 
days  after.  M.  Piggott  stopped  where  he  shot  the  dog  and  re- 
loaded his  rifle.  The  wife  of  the  deponent,  upon  seeing  that, 
went  out  of  the  door  to  make  her  children  enter  the  house,  and 

she  said,  "May  the confound  you!    Why  didn't  you  kill 

the  dog  stone  dead,  and  why  didn't  that  hussy  of  a  woman  who 
lives  at  your  house  make  her  bastards  remain  in  the  house?  If 
her  children  had  been  legitimate,  God  would  not  have  punished 
her  in  this  fashion,"  Groot  upon  seeing  that  took  his  wife  by 
the  hand  and  made  her  sit  on  a  chair.  He  deposes  that  Piggott 
answered:     "God  damn  you!    You  call  my  children  bastards, 


290  ILLINOIS' HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

legitimes  que  dieu  ne  Lauroit  pas  punie  de  cette  faf on,  que  groot 
voyant  cela  a  pris  Sa  femme  par  la  main  et  la  faite  assoir  Sur  une 
Chaise,  que  piquet  avoit  repondu  que  dieu  vous  damne,  vous 
apelez  mes  enfants  Batard  jenveroy  votre  ame  En  Enfer,  il  a 
Entr^  dans  la  maison  avec  Sa  Carabine  a  la  main  En  tramblant 
m^  groot  luy  a  dit  de  ne  pas  Entrer  avec  Sa  Carabine  dans  la 
maison  et  de  penser  a  ce  quil  vouloit  faire  Et  de  metre  Sa  Carabine 
En  dehor  de  la  porte  le  priant  pour  lamour  de  dieu  de  ne  pas  les 
tuer  dans  Sa  maison,  piquet  a  repondit  adressant  la  parole  a  la 
fe[mm]e  du  deposant  dieu  vous  damne  jenveroy  votre  ame  a 
leternit^.  En  disant  ces  propos  Piquet  avoit  Sa  Carabine  la 
Crosse  apuyee  sur  le  coste  droit  avec  une  main  sur  la  platine  Et 
lautre  sur  le  Canon,  le  Bout  tourn^  Sur  le  Sain  de  M^^  Groot,  que 
luy  deposant  a  Entendu  les  ressort  de  la  Carabine  faire  du  bruit 
mais  quil  nest  pas  sur  sil  a  rat^  Et  dans  linstant  quil  a  entendii 
Craquer  les  ressorts  de  la  Carabine  piquet  Setoit  retourn^  Et  a 
pris  Sa  Corne  et  a  Ramorc^  de  frais  Sa  Carabine,  luy  deposant 
luy  a  dit  p^  lamour  de  dieu  de  ne  pas  tuer  Sa  femme  et  de  prendre 
garde  a  ce  quil  aloit  faire  Et  de  Sortir,  dieu  vous  damne  Sacr^ 
Coquin  Bien  Souvant  vous  mavez  afrontd  je  vous  serviray  de 
meme.  En  disant  cela  piquet  a  tourne  la  teste  du  cost6  de  la  porte 
et  a  apercu  un  homme  qui  est  le  S^  Izaac  West  assis  dans  Sa  porte 
qui  Etoit  vis  a  vis  la  porte  de  luy  deposant.  Et  que  avant  de 
tourner  la  teste  il  avoit  leve  sa  Carabine  et  avoit  present^  le  Bout  a 
luy  deposant  quaussitot  quil  a  apercu  West  il  abaisse  sa  Carabine 
Et  a  sorty  de  la  maison  Et  a  pris  le  Chemin  de  Sa  maison.  Et  luy 
deposant  layant  suivy.  et  luy  a  dit  Croyez  vous  que  cela  merite 
Satisfaction,  si  vous  le  croyez  metez  votre  carabine  a  part, 
mais  que  piquet  navoit  pas  voulu.  quil  luy  avoit  repondu  que  de  ce 
moment  jusques  au  soir  je  penseray  a  ce  que  je  feray.  que  voyant 
quil  Etoit  En  danger  de  Sa  vie  luy  et  sa  femme  ne  pouvant  pas 
sortir  de  Sa  maison  Sans  En  craindre  les  suites  il  etoit  venti  pour 
en  demander  justice  a  la  Cour.  qui  est  tout  ce  quil  a  a  dire  que 
cest  la  pure  verite.     Jacob  groot. 

avons  fait  paroitre  led*  jaques  piquet  lequel  a  dit  que  Son 
intention  Etoit  de  tuer  le  Chien  Si  m^  groot  ne  prenoit  pas  sur  luy 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1787  291 

I  will  send  your  soul  to  Hell."  He  entered  the  house  with  his 
rifle  in  his  hand,  all  in  a  tremble.  M.  Groot  told  him  not  to  enter 
the  house  with  his  rifle  and  to  think  what  he  was  going  to  do  and 
to  put  his  rifle  outside  the  door;  and  he  prayed  him  for  the  love 
of  God  not  to  kill  them  in  his  house.  Piggott  responded  in  ans- 
wering the  words  of  the  deponent's  wife:  "God  damn  you! 
I'll  send  your  soul  to  eternity."  While  saying  these  words  Pig- 
gott had  his  rifle  with  the  butt  supported  on  his  right  side  with 
one  hand  on  the  screw-plate  and  the  other  on  the  barrel,  and  the 
end  pointed  toward  the  breast  of  Madame  Groot;  and  he, 
the  deponent,  heard  the  spring  of  the  rifle  make  a  noise,  but  he 
is  not  sure  that  there  was  a  flash  in  the  pan,  and  at  the  moment  he 
heard  the  spring  of  the  rifle  crack,  Piggott  had  turned  and  taken 
his  horn  and  primed  his  rifle  anew.  He,  the  deponent,  told  him 
for  the  love  of  God  not  to  kill  his  wife  and  to  take  care  what 
he  was  going  to  do  and  to  go  out.  "  God  damn  you,  you  damned 
rascal,  you  have  attacked  me  often  enough,  I  wiU  serve  you 
the  same  way."  In  saying  that  Piggott  turned  his  head  toward 
the  door  and  saw  a  man,  M.  Isaac  West,  seated  in  his  doorway 
which  was  opposite  the  deponent's  door ;  and  that  before  turning 
his  head  he  had  raised  his  rifle  and  aimed  at  the  deponent;  that 
as  soon  as  he  perceived  West,  he  lowered  his  rifle  and  went  out 
of  the  house  and  started  for  his  house;  and  that  he,  the  deponent, 
followed  him  and  said  to  him :  ''Do  you  believe  that  this  deserves 
satisfaction?  If  you  believe  it,  put  your  rifle  down."  But  Pig- 
gott was  not  willing.  That  he  had  answered  him:  ''From  now 
till  evening  I  will  think  of  what  I  shall  do. "  That  he,  the  depon- 
ent, seeing  that  he  and  his  wife  were  in  danger  of  their  lives  and 
that  they  could  not  go  out  of  their  house  without  fear  of  the  con- 
sequences, he  had  come  to  demand  justice  of  the  Court.  This 
is  all  that  he  has  to  say  and  it  is  the  simple  truth. 

Jacob  Groot. 
We  summoned  the  said  James  Piggott,  who  said  that  his  in- 
tention was  to  kill  the  dog,  if  M.  Groot  didn't  take  it  upon  him- 
self to  kill  it;  that  there  came  a  woman  of  the  neighborhood  who 
told  him  that  Groot  was  not  two  hundred  paces  from  his  house, 


292  ILLINOIS  SISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

de  le  tuer.  quil  est  venu  une  de  ses  voisines  qui  luy  a  dit  que  groot 
netoit  pas  a  deux  cent  pas  de  Chez  luy  lorsque  le  Chien  a  mordti 
son  Enfans  quil  a  Ete  Environ  deux  heures  a  venir  que  le  Chien  a 
meme  emport^  un  morceau  du  nez  de  lenfant.  que  groot  Etant 
arrive  ches  luy  il  y  a  Ete  pour  voir  ce  quil  vouloit  faire  de  Son 
Chien  que  groot  luy  avoit  repondii  quil  etoit  juste  que  Son  Chien 
meure  puisquil  avoit  mordu  Son  Enfan  quil  avoit  deja  averty  groot 
que  Son  Chien  avoit  mordu  deux  ou  trois  personnes  avant  celui 
ci  que  cette  fois  netoit  pas  a  disputer.  que  lors  quil  a  tire  le  Chien 
il  la  apelle  En  dehor  du  fort  et  quil  la  Blesse.  que  y  ayant  quelques 
enfans  dehors  ils  ont  ouvert  la  porte  du  fort  le  Chien  ayant  Rentrd 
il  a  Charge  Sa  Carabine  pour  la  chercer  de  tuer.  que  Etant  a  la 
porte  du  fort  il  a  rencontre  madame  groot  qui  lui  a  fait  Beaucoup 
de  reproches  davoir  blesse  le  Chien.  que  dans  le  tems  il  netoit 
pas  Beaucoup  en  situation  de  donner  Satisfaction  a  madame  groot 
quil  luy  a  dit  achevez  le  Detuer  vous  meme,  que  Son  intention 
Etoit  toujours  de  le  tuer,  quil  Croyoit  que  le  Chien  etoit  entre  ches 
son  maitre,  quil  y  Etoit  Entre  pour  le  faire  sortir  et  p^  iinir  de  le 
tuer.  que  si  groot  navoit  chasse  le  Chien  que  son  intention  Etoit 
de  le  tuer  luy  meme  dans  la  maison,  sans  faire  tor  a  personne.  que 
madame  groot  luy  ayant  dit  de  mauvais  paroles  En  parlant  et  luy 
reprochant  Ses  Batard,  il  luy  avoit  dit  que  Son  caractere  Etoit 
meilleur  que  le  Sien  quil  avoit  dit  a  madame  groot  quelle 
Etoit  une  Sacree  Salope  et  quil  enveroit  Son  Caractere  En 
Enfer,  que  lors  quil  avoit  dit  cela  M^  groot  et  sa  femme 
avoit  compris  la  Chose  tout  autrement  Et  quil  setoient  imaginez 
voyant  Sa  carabine  quil  avoit  Envie  de  les  tuer  quil  avoit  mal 
Compris  la  Chose,  quil  Croit  Sans  en  Etre  Bien  sur  que  jean 
solivant  Etoit  la  plus  grande  partie  du  tems  a  la  porte.  quil  na 
jamais  manace  m^  groot  ni  personne  de  sa  famille  de  leur  faire 
aucun  tor  que  ce  na  jamais  Et6  Son  intention,  qui  est  tout  ce 
quil  a  a  dire. 

avons  fait  venir  Izaac  West  temoins  produit  par  le  s^  groot 
lequel  apres  sermant  par  luy  fait  de  direlaverite  a  dit  que  lors  que 
le  Chien  a  mordu  lenfant  quil  Etoit  dans  Son  champ  et  quil  a  arriv^ 
comme  piquet  sortoit  de  La  maison  de  groot  p^  tirer  le  Chien  quil 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1787  293 

when  the  dog  bit  the  child;  that  he  had  been  about  two  hours  in 
coming;  that  the  dog  had  bitten  off  a  piece  of  the  child's  nose; 
that  when  Groot  arrived  at  his  house,  he  went  there  to  see  what 
Groot  was  willing  to  do  with  his  dog,  and  that  Groot  had  answered 
that  it  was  just  that  his  dog  should  die,  since  it  had  bitten  his 
child;  that  he  had  already  notified  Groot  that  his  dog  had  bitten 
two  or  three  persons  before  this  one;  that  this  time  was  not  to  be 
disputed;  that  when  he  shot  the  dog,  he  called  it  outside  the 
blockhouse,  and  that  he  wounded  it;  that  there  were  some  chil- 
dren outside  and  they  had  opened  the  door  of  the  blockhouse, 
and  that  when  the  dog  entered,  he  loaded  his  rifle  to  try  to  kill 
it;  that  when  he  was  at  the  door  of  the  blockhouse,  he  met  Madame 
Groot  who  reproached  him  severely  for  having  wounded  the  dog; 
that  at  the  time  he  was  not  able  to  give  satisfaction  to  Madame 
Groot;  that  he  had  said  to  her,  "Finish  killing  it  yourself;"  that 
his  intention  was  to  kill  it  and  that  he  believed  that  the  dog  had 
entered  into  its  master's  house;  that  he  had  entered  there  to  drive 
it  out  and  finish  killing  it;  that  if  Groot  had  not  chased  the 
dog  out,  that  it  was  his  intention  to  kill  it  himself  in  the  house 
without  harming  anybody;  that  Madame  Groot  had  used  bad 
words  in  speaking  to  him  of  it  and  in  throwing  his  bastards  in 
his  teeth.  He  had  said  that  his  character  was  better  than  hers; 
and  he  had  said  to  Madame  Groot  that  she  was  a  damned  slut 
and  he  would  send  her  character  to  Hell.  He  says  that  when 
he  had  said  that,  M.  Groot  and  his  wife  had  understood  the  thing 
quite  differently,  and  that  the  former  had  imagined,  because  he  had 
his  rifle,  that  he  wanted  to  kill  them;  that  Groot  had  badly  under- 
stood the  thing;  that  he  believed,  without  being  very  sure  of  it,  that 
John  Sullivan  was  most  of  the  time  at  the  door;  that  he  never 
threatened  to  do  any  harm  to  M.  Groot  or  any  one  of  the  family; 
that  it  was  never  his  intention;  which  is  all  he  has  to  say. 
We  summoned  Isaac  West  as  witness  produced  by  M.  Groot, 
who  after  taking  the  oath  to  tell  the  truth,  said  that  when  the  dog 
bit  the  child,  he  was  in  his  field,  and  that  he  arrived  as  Piggott 
was  going  out  of  Groot's  house  to  shoot  the  dog;  that  Piggott  called 
the  dog  out  of  the  door  of  the  blockhouse,  where  he  shot  it;  that 


294  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  apell6  le  Chien  hor  de  la  porte  du  fort,  ou  il  la  tird.  que  luy  de- 
posant  a  dit  a  piquet  pourquoy  il  navoit  pas  tir^  le  Chien,  que  pi- 
quet lui  a  repondti  j'ay  assez  de  satisfaction  a  present  Et  je  n'ay 
pas  voulu  le  tuer.  que  piquet  ayant  recharg^  sa  Carabine  a  Et^ 
dans  la  maison  de  groot.  que  luy  deposant  Etoit  assis  a  Sa  porte 
vis  a  vis  celle  de  groot  quil  a  vH  Seulement  que  piquet  avoit  sa 
Carabine  dans  Ses  mains  Elev^e  Et  En  faisoit  plusieurs  mouve- 
ment  Et  entendoit  parler  avec  force,  mais  quil  na  p<i  distinguer 
ce  qui  se  disoit,  Et  quil  Croyoit  a  tout  moment  Entendre  tirer  la 
Carabine  que  luy  meme  En  Etoit  hors  de  luy  meme  par  la  fureur 
dud^  piquet  quil  croyoit  reelement  que  piquet  aloit  tuer  quelq'un 
que  apr^s  tous  Ses  mouvement  il  a  vu  piquet  Se  retourner  Et 
ouvrir  la  baterie  de  Sa  Carabine  Et  verser  la  poudre  dans  le  Bas- 
sinet Et  la  morcer  tout  de  frais.  Et  quapres  quil  a  Eu  amorc^  la 
carabine  il  a  Entendu  quelque  parole  quil  na  pti  comprendre  et 
que  piquet  a  sorty  tout  de  suite,  ajoute  En  outre  que  lors  que 
piquet  a  Ete  sorty  que  groot  la  suivy  et  quil  luy  a  dit  par  lafront 
que  vous  mavez  fait  detre  venu  ches  moy  avec  votre  carabine  metez 
la  par  terre  et  nous  alons  nous  donner  satisfaction,  mais  que 
piquet  avoit  refusd,  que  groot  avoit  dit  puisque  vous  ne  voulez  pas 
je  vais  voir  ce  que  je  feray  dicy  a  ce  soir.  qui  est  tout  ce  quil 
a  dit  savoir.  lecture  a  luy  faite  de  Sa  declaration  a  dit  Contenir 
verity  y  a  persiste  et  a  Sign^. 

Isaac  West. 
Veu  par  la  Cour  assembl^e  les  declarations  cy  dessus  Ensemble 
la  deposition  du  temoin  Izaac  verst  ladite  cour  a  ordonne  et  or- 
donne  que  led*  jaques  piquet  donnera  Bonne  et  suffisante  caution 
a  la  satisfaction  et  demande  dud*  Jacob  groot  qui  repondra  par  Sa 
personne  et  Ses  Biens  de  tous  les  tor  mal  fait  cele  prejudice  Et 
atantats  que  led*  jaques  piquet  pouroit  Exercer  tramer  ou  induire 
sur  la  vie  dud*  groot  de  celle  de  Sa  femme  Et  de  Sa  famille  ainsy 
que  de  tous  Ses  autres  Biens  dont  ladite  Caution  Solvable  Sera 
Recue  pardevant  M'"  Robert  Wach  commandant  dud*  lieu  du 
grand  Ruisseau  a  la  satisfaction  dud*  groot  auquel  dit  M^  Wach 
nous  enjoignons  de  donner  la  main  a  lexecution  de  notre  presente 
sentence  Et  de   nous   en   informer   condamnons  les  parties  a 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1787  295 

he,  the  deponent,  asked  Piggott  why  he  had  not  killed  the  dog 
and  that  Piggott  answered:  "I  have  sufficient  satisfaction  now 
and  I  did  not  wish  to  kill  it;"  that  Piggott  had  reloaded  his 
rifle  and  was  in  Groot's  house  and  that  he,  the  deponent,  was 
seated  at  his  door  opposite  Groot's;  and  that  he  only  saw 
that  Piggott  had  his  gun  raised  in  his  hands  and  was  making 
several  movements  with  it  and  he  heard  words  of  violence,  but 
he  could  not  distinguish  what  was  said;  and  that  he  expected 
to  hear  the  gun  fired  at  any  moment;  that  he  was  beside  himself 
on  account  of  the  fury  of  the  said  Piggott;  that  he  really  believed 
that  Piggott  was  going  to  kill  some  one;  that  after  all  these  move- 
ments he  saw  Piggott  turn,  cock  the  hammer  of  his  rifle  and  pour 
powder  into  the  pan  and  he  reprimed  it;  and  after  he  had  re- 
primed  it,  he  heard  some  words  which  he  could  not  understand, 
and  that  Piggott  went  out  immediately.  He  adds,  furthermore, 
that  when  Piggott  went  out,  Groot  followed  him  and  said  to 
him:  "Because  of  the  insult  you  have  done  me  in  coming  to  my 
house  with  your  rifle,  put  it  on  the  ground  and  we  are  going  to 
have  satisfaction;"  but  Piggott  had  refused;  that  Groot  had 
said:  "Since  you  are  unwilling,  I  am  going  to  see  what  I  shall  do 
between  now  and  evening,"  which  is  all  that  he  said  he  knew. 
Reading  of  his  deposition  was  made  to  him  and  he  said  that  it 
contained  the  truth  and  persisted  in  it,  and  he  has  signed. 

Isaac  West.  ' 
After  consideration  of  the  above  affidavits,  together  with  the 
deposition  of  the  witness,  Isaac  West,  by  the  assembled  Court, 
the  said  Court  decreed  and  does  decree  that  the  said  James 
Piggott  shall  find  good  and  sufficient  surety  to  the  satisfaction 
and  demand  of  the  said  Jacob  Groot,  and  that  the  bondsman 
shall  be  answerable  in  his  person  and  his  property  for  all  wrongs, 
malefaction,  concealed  tort,  and  criminal  attempts,  which  the 
said  James  Piggott  may  practise,  plot  or  incite  against  the  life 
of  the  said  Groot,  of  that  of  his  wife  and  of  his  family,  or 
against  his  property,  and  for  this  the  said  solvent  bondsman 
shall  be  received  before  M.  Robert  Watts,  commandant  of  the 
said  place  of  the  Grand  Ruisseau,  to  the  satisfaction  of  the  said 


296  ILLINOIS  taSTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

payer  Chacun  la  moiti^  des  frais  Suivant  le  memoire  qui  sera 
produit  par  le  grefier  donn^  en  Cour  le  huit  may  mil  sept  Cent 
quatre  vingt  sept. 
[Signed] 
a*  Girardin  mth  Saucier 

marque  de  marque  de 

+  + 

Louis  Ghatel  Joseph  lapens^e 

Labuxiere  grefier  J  B  H  LaCroix  prsdt. 


a  une  Cour  du  premier  juin  mil  sept  Cent  quatre  vingt  Sept. 

M^^  francois  Saucier,  antoine  girardin,  philipe  angel,  B*®  Sau- 
cier, Charles  ducharme,  Mathieu  saucier  Et  pierre  Laperche  ont 
fait  le  Sermant  doffice  En  qualite  de  magistrat  p'"  la  Nouvelle 
Nomination. 

a  la  meme  Cour 

Thorn  Bredy  a  fait  pareillement  sermant  doffice  pour  la  Charge 
dhuissier  de  la  Cour. 

a  la  meme  Cour 
JEAN  B^^  DUMAY  dcmandeur  contre  Le  S^  myer  Michaels  def- 

fendeur 

Le  demandeur  reclame  vingt  pots  dhuille  quil  a  ches  le  s^  myer 
michaels. 

Le  deffendeur  replique  que  led^  dumay  luy  doit  une  somme  dar- 
gent  quil  offre  de  luy  remetre  son  huile  En  payant  ce  quil  luy  doit 
par  son  Billet  En  argent. 

La  Cour  a  ordonne  que  le  s^  maher  gardera  Ihuille  en  deduc- 
tion de  ce  quil  luy  est  dub  par  le  demandeur  a  raison  de  Cinq 
livres  le  pot  prix  du  Cour,  sauf  aud^  dumay  den  remetre  le  mon- 
tant  en  argent  au  deffendeur  condamne  dumay  aux  frais. 
a  la  meme  Cour. 

Sur  une  demande  formee  par  le  S^  pierre  Laperche  p^  obtenir 
une  saisie  sur  deux  Chevaux  quil  a  dit  apartenir  au  Nomme  Chate- 

1  Piggott  offered  on  May  i8th  the  persons  of  Thomas  Wine  and  Benjamin  Rogers  as 
bondsmen. ^Chi.  Hist.  Soc,    Cah.  Rec. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1787  297 

Groot  and  we  enjoin  the  said  M.  Watts  to  see  to  the  execution  of 
our  present  sentence  and  to  inform  us  thereof.  We  condemn  the 
parties  to  pay  each  the  half  of  the  costs  according  to  the  memoran- 
dum which  will  be  furnished  by  the  clerk.  Given  in  Court  the 
eight  of  May,  seventeen  hundred  and  eighty  seven. ^ 
[Signed] 
Ant.  Girardin.  Mt.  Saucier. 

Mark  of  Mark  of 

+  + 

Louis  Chatel.  Joseph  Lapanc6. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  Pres. 

At  a  Court,  June  ist,  1787. 
MM.   Francois  Saucier,  Antoine  Girardin,  Philippe   Engel, 
Bte.  Saucier,  Charles  DuCharme,  Matthieu  Saucier  and  Pierre 
Laperche  have  taken  the  oath  of  office  as  magistrates  by  the  new 
election. 

At  the  same  Court. 
Thomas  Brady  has  taken  a  like  oath  of  office  as  huissier  of 
the  Court. 

At  the  same  Court. 
Jean  Bte.  Dumay,  Plaintiff,  vs.  M.  Myer  Michaels,  De- 
fendant. 
The  plaintiff  claims  twenty  jugs  of  oil  which  he  has  at  the  house 
of  M.  Michaels. 

The  defendant  answers  that  the  said  Dumay  owes  him  a 
sum  of  money,  and  that  he  offers  to  return  his  oil  if  he  pays  that 
which  is  owing  to  him  on  his  note  in  money. 

The  Court  decreed  that  M.  Michaels  shall  keep  the  oil  which 
shall  be  deducted  from  that  which  is  due  him  by  the  plaintiff 
at  the  rate  of  five  livres  the  jug,  which  is  the  current  price,  re- 
serving the  right  to  the  said  Dumay  to  return  the  amount  in  money 
to  the  defendant,  and  condemned  Dumay  to  pay  the  costs. 
At  the  same  Court. 
On  a  petition  drawn  up  by  M.  Pierre  Laperche  to  obtain  an 
attachment  on  two  horses,  which  he  said  belong  to  the  named 
Chatelrau,  at  present  in  possession  of  M.  Mailhet  at  Cahokia, 


298  ILLINOIS*  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

lerau  Entre  les  mains  du  s^  mailhet  aux  Cahos.     Et  sur  le  sermant 
dud*  mailhet  Et  du  S'^  Champlin  que  les  chevaux  n'apartenoit  pas 
aud*  chatelerau  Nous  avons  \ev6  la  saisie  sauf  aud*  s^  p'"^  laperche 
a  Se  pourvoir  sur  les  autres  Biens  dud*  Chatelerau. 
La  Cour  est  ajourn^e  au  i®^  juillet  prochain. 

f  saucier, 
a  une  Cour  tenue  Extraordinairement  le  treize  juillet  mil  Sept 
Cent  quatre  vingt  Sept. 

M'"^  francois  Saucier  Presidant         Charles  ducharme 
Atoine  [sic]  Girardin  Mathieu  Saucier 

B*®  Saucier  pierre  Laperche 

Philipe  angel 
Entre  Le  S^  Louis  Lorimier  demandeur  contre  Le  S^  jean 

DUMOULiN  deffendeur 
Veu  la  requete  presentee  a  la  Cour  par  le  s^  Louis  Lorimier  ten- 
dante  a  vu  des  domagement  pour  les  saisies  qui  ont  Ete  faites  a 
S*^  genevieve  et  aux  Cahos  par  m''  hugues  yourd  et  celle  faite  aux 
Cahos  par  m^  dumoulin  charge  de  la  procuration  dud*  S^*  hyourd. 
ouy  le  le  S^  dumoulin  qui  a  dit  que  le  s""  Lorimier  Etoit  Encore 
Redevable  a  la  societe  Et  quil  Seroit  a  meme  de  se  faire  alouer  les 
des  domagement,  quil  conviendroit  que  pour  luy  il  netoit  point 
charge  des  affaires  ny  de  la  saisie  qui  avoit  Et6  faite  a  S*®  gene- 
vieve avant  sa  procuration. 

Sur  quoy  la  Cour  a  renvoyd  les  parties  a  Se  pourvoir  devant  des 
arbitres  quil  voudront  Choisir  soit  Sur  lun  ou  lautre  Rive  pour 
raison  des  demandes  contenues  En  ladite  Requete  p^  le  tout  etre  Ex- 
amine par  les  arbitres  decider  ce  quil  avisseront  Bon  Etre  ainsy  que 
p^  les  frais  et  depens  de  justice  delibere  aux  Cahos  led*  jour  Et  an. 
[Signed] 

B  Saucier  a*  Girardin 

DuCharme  pierre  Lapeche 

Mt.  Saucier  f.  saucier. 

Phillipe  Engel 
Labuxiere  grefier. 

■1  Louis  Lorimier  was  born  in  Canada  in  1749,  lived  sometime  on  the  Miami,  Ohio,  and 
founded  the  post  at  Cape  Girardeau,  Missouri,  in  1794.     He  was  appointed  commandant  of 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1787  299 

and  on  the  oath  of  the  said  Mailhet  and  M.  Champlin  that  the 
horses  do  not  belong  to  the  said  Chatelrau,  we  have  raised  the 
attachment,  reserving  the  right  to  the  said  M.  Pierre  Laperche 
to  sue  on  the  other  goods  of  the  said  Chatelrau. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  the  first  of  July  next. 

At  a  Court  meeting  in  special  session,  July  13,  1787. 
MM.  President  Francois  Saucier      Charles  DuCharme 
Antoine  Girardin  Matthieu  Saucier 

Bte.  Saucier  Pierre  Laperche 

Philippe  Engel 
M.  Louis  LorimierS  Plaintiff,  vs,  M.  Jean  Dumoulin,  De- 
fendant. 
In  view  of  the  petition  presented  to  the  Court  by  M.  Louis 
Lorimier,  demanding  damages  for  the  seizures  which  have  been 
made  at  Ste.  Genevieve  and  at  Cahokia  by  M.  Hugh  Heward 
and  for  that  made  at  Cahokia  by  M.  Dumoulin  intrusted  with  the 
power  of  attorney  from  the  said  M.  Heward. 

Heard  M.  Dumoulin  who  said  that  M.  Lorimier  was  still  in 
debt  to  the  partnership  and  that  the  latter  should  be  able  to  have 
the  damages  allowed,  which  he  would  agree  to.     As  for  himself 
he  was  not  intrusted  with  the  business  nor  with  the  attachment, 
which  had  been  made  at  Ste.  Genevieve  before  his  attorneyship. 
Whereupon  the  Court  dismissed  the  parties  to  sue  before 
arbitrators,  whom  they  shall  choose  from  either  side  of  the  river, 
in  regard  to  the  prayers  contained  in  the  said  petition  so  that  all 
be  examined  by  the  arbitrators  that  they  may  decide  what  they 
consider  just  as  well   as  the  costs  and  charges.     Decreed   at 
Cahokia  the  said  day  and  year. 
[Signed] 
B.  Saucier.  Philippe  Engel. 

DuCharme.  At.  Girardin. 

Mt.  Saucier.  *  Pierre  Laperche. 

F.  Saucier.  Labuxiere,  Clerk. 

the  post  by  the  Spanish  government.  He  was  a  fur-trader,  and  gained  great  influence  over 
the  Indians.  He  died  June  26,  1812. — Rozier,  Early  SetUement  of  the  Mississippi  Valley, 
170  et  seq. 


300  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  deux  juillet  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt  sept. 
M^®  fr  saucier  presidant  philipe  angel 

ant  girardin  p'"®  Laperche 

charles  ducharme 

Robert  Cahorn  demandeur  centre  fr  Gramont  deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  demande  centre  le  deffendeur  le  pavement  de 
son  billet  Echus  montant  a  la  somme  de  trois  cent  huit  livres  en 
argent  payable  En  pelterie  synifiee  sur  led*  billet  suivant  les  prix 
y  port^. 

Le  deffendeur  a  dit  quil  luy  devoit  quelque  Chose  Et  quil 
avoit  un  compte  a  produire  quil  navoit  pas  de  quoy  payer 
actuellement  quil  offroit  son  Cheval.  Et  quil  repetoit  contre  le 
S'"  cahorn  neuf  piastres  pour  le  loyer  dun  Cheval  et  une  piastre 
p^  le  loyer  dune  journee  de  son  sauvage  le  tout  formant  Cin- 
quante  livres. 

sur  quoy  la  Cour  a  condamne  led*  gramont  a  payer  son 
Billet  suivant  son  contenu  Et  ce  sans  delais  a  la  deduction 
des  Cinquante  livres  quil  repete  a  quoy  led*  Gramont  sera  Con- 
traint  Et  condamne  aux  frais  Et  depens  donne  En  Cour  lesd* 
jour  Et  an. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 

Le  S^  Wale  demandeur  contre  Philipe  gervais  deffendeur 

le  demandeur  demande  contre  le  deffendeur  le  payment  de  Son 
billet  Echu  montant  a  la  somme  de  Cent  quinze  livres  en  argent 
ou  pelterie. 

Le  deffendeur  a  dit  quil  reconnoit  led*  billet  mais  quil 
ne  pouvoit  le  payer  actuellement  Et  quil  navoit  pas  de 
quoy. 

La  Cour  a  condamne  led*  philipe  gervais  a  payer  le  montant  de 
Son  Billet  Et  aux  frais  et  depens.  donnd  En  Cour  lesd*  jour 
Et  an. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 

Le  S^  Wale  demandeur  contre  antoine  lamarche 

defendeur 

Le  demandeur  demande  le  payement  de  Son  Billet  de  Soixante 
quatre  livres  le  deffendeur  a  offert  de  le  payer  sous  ce  mois  icy 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1787  301 

At  a  Court,  July  2.  1787. 
MM.  Fr.  Saucier,  President.  Philippe  Engel. 

Ant.  Girardin.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Charles  DuCharme. 
Robert  Cahorn,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Fr.  Grandmont,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  brings  suit  against  the  defendant  for  the  pay- 
ment of  his  note,  which  has  fallen  due,  amounting  to  the  sum  of 
three  hundred  and  eight  livres  in  money  payable  in  peltries 
as  declared  on  the  said  note,  according  to  the  prices  stated 
thereon. 

The  defendant  said  that  he  owed  the  plaintiff  something  and 
that  he  had  an  account  to  produce;  that  he  didn't  have  the 
means  to  pay  at  present;  that  he  offered  his  horse;  and  that  he 
claims  from  M.  Cahorn  nine  piastres  for  the  hire  of  a  horse  and  a 
piastre  for  a  day's  wage  of  his  savage,  the  whole  amounting  to 
fifty  livres. 

Whereupon  the  Court  condemned  the  said  Grandmont  to  pay 
his  note  according  to  its  content,  after  deducting  the  fifty  livres 
which  he  claims,  and  this  without  delay,  to  which  the  said  Grand- 
mont shall  be  constrained  and  condemned  to  pay  cost  and  charges. 
Given  in  Court  the  said  day  and  year. 

At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Wale,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Philippe  Gervais,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  brings  suit  against  the  defendant  for  the  payment 
of  his  note,  already  matured,  amounting  to  the  sum  of  one  hun- 
dred and  fifteen  livres  in  money  or  peltries. 

The  defendant  said  that  he  acknowledged  the  said  note, 
but  that  he  could  not  pay  it  now,  and  that  he  didn't  have  the 
means. 

The  Court  condemned  the  said  Philippe  Gervais  to  pay  the 
amount  of  his  note  with  costs  and  charges.  Given  in  Court 
the  said  day  and  year. 

At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Wale,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Antoine  Lamarche,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  deniands  the  payment  of  his  note  for  sixty-four 
livres.     The  defendant  offered  to  pay  it  during  this  month  be- 


302  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

dicy  a  la  Cour  prochaine,  la  Cour  a  acordd  ce  delais  du  Con- 
sentement  des  parties  donnd  lesd*  jour  et  an. 
La  Cour  est  adjournee  au  i^^  aoust  1787. 

fr.  saucier,  pres*^. 
a  une  Cour  du  i®^  aoust  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt  Sept. 
M'^^  fr.  Saucier  presidant  p'"®  Laperche 

antoine  girardin  Philipe  angel 

Charle  ducharme  Mathieu  Saucier 

Entre  lafemme  Roch  demanderesse  contre  Louis  Lambert 

deffendeur 
La  demanderesse  reclame  Son  fils  quelle  a  mis  Ches  le  def- 
fendeur jusqua  lage  de  18  ans  aleguand  que  son  fils  Est  Extropi^ 
dun  Coup  de  hache  c[uil  est  mal  pensse  Et  negligd  Et  que  les  poux 
et  vermine  le  mange  demandant  que  le  deffendeur  luy  remette  son 
fils. 

Le  deffendeur  a  desnie  le  tout  et  a  dit  que  led*  Enfant  Etoit 
Bien  signe  Et  quil  En  avoit  tous  les  Soins  possible. 

La  Cour  renvoy  laffaire  devant  M^  girardin  p^  ex- 
aminer sur  les  lieux  la  Verity  des  faits  Et  decider  ce  que  de 
Raison. 

La  Cour  est  ajournde  au  i*^  7^^®  1787. 

fr.  saucier. 

a  une  Cour  du  i®^  Septembre  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt 
Sept. 

M™  fr  saucier  B*«  Saucier 

ant®  girardin  Math,  saucier 

philipe  angel  p^®  Laperche 

FRANCOIS  gerosme  dcmandcur  Contre  Joseph  Biguier  dit 

GROSLE  deffendeur. 
Le  demandeur  repete  la  Somme  de  Cent  livres  quil  dit  etre 
dub  a  sa  femme  restant  de  celle  de  deux  Cent  livres  quil  luy 
devoit.  Le  deffendeur  a  repondu  quil  avoit  pave  par  un  compte 
quil  a  produit  Excedant  ladite  somme  de  Cent  livres.  dont 
ledit  Compte  examine  de  la  veu  du  demandeur  il  revien  Cinq 
livres  au  deffendeur  p^  sa  femme  tous  comptes  deduit.  la 
Cour  a  condamn^  le  demandeur  a  payer  au  deffendeur  Cinq 


COURT  RECORD,  AUGUST,  1787  303 

tween  now  and  the  next  Court.     The  Court  granted  this  delay 
with  the  consent  of  the  parties.     Given  the  said  day. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  August  i,  1787. 

At  a  Court,  August  i,  1787. 
MM.  Fr.  Saucier,  President.         Pierre  Laperche. 
Antoine  Girardin.  Philippe  Engel. 

Charles  DuCharme.  Matthieu  Saucier. 

The  woman  Roch,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Louis  Lambert,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  claims  her  son,  whom  she  placed  in  the  house  of 
the  defendant  until  he  should  be  18  years  old,  pleading  that  her 
son  is  mained  by  a  stroke  of  an  axe,  that  he  is  badly  fed  and  is 
neglected,  and  that  lice  and  vermin  are  eating  him;  and  she 
demands  that  the  defendant  should  restore  her  son  to  her. 

The  plaintiff  denied  all  and  said  the  said  child  was  well  fed 
and  that  he  had  all  possible  care. 

The  Court  referred  the  cause  to  M.  Girardin  to  examine  on 
the  spot  the  truth  of  the  facts  and  to  decide  what  is  just. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  Sept.  i,  1787. 

Fr.  Saucier. 


At  a  Court,  September  i,  1787. 
MM.  Fr  Saucier.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Ant.  Girardin.  Math.  Saucier. 

Philippe  Engel.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Francois  Gerosme,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Joseph  Biguier,  called 

Grosle,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  demands  the  sum  of  one  hundred  Uvres  which  he 
says  is  due  his  wife  being  the  balance  of  two  hundred  Uvres  which 
the  defendant  owed  her.  The  defendant  answered  that  he  had  paid, 
according  to  an  account  which  he  exhibited,  more  than  the  said 
sum  of  a  hundred  Uvres,  by  which  said  account,  examined  with  the 
acknowledgement  of  the  plaintiff,  there  should  be  five  Uvres 
returned  to  him  by  the  wife  of  the  plaintiff,  after  all  accounts  are 
deducted. 


304  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

livres.     Et  aux  frais  Et  depens  liquidez  a  vingt  livres  se  qui 
sera  execute. 

frais 
p^  I  ordre  a  Biguier 5  lb 

I  ordre  a  antaya 5 

p^  Ihuissier  qui  a  porte  les  2  ordres. . .  10 

p^  la  sentence 5 


251b 
a  la  meme  cour. 
Le  S'"  Glamorgan  demandeur  Centre  Le  Nomme   duchesnau 

deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  demande  au  deffendeur  le  payement  dun 
Billet  de  la  Somme  de  Cent  Soixante  Cinq  livres  en  pelterie  a 
luy  transporte  par  louis  Chateleraud.  ledit  billet  Exibe  a  la 
cour  Echus.  ouy  le  deffendeur  qui  a  dit  quil  avoit  deja  offert 
de  payer  mais  que  Ion  navoit  pas  pu  luy  produire  son  billet  ale- 
quant  quil  Etoit  perdu  Et  quil  avoit  deja  donne  un  acompte  au 
S^  Labadie  sur  une  Copie  dud*  billet  par  ordre  de  M^  Crouzat 
Commandant  de  S*  Louis,  sur  quoy  la  cour  a  Condamne  le 
deffendeur  a  payer  au  demandeur  le  montant  de  Son  Billet  sauf 
Son  rembourcement  Sur  le  s'"  Labadie  qui  Sera  fait  au  S*"  Gla- 
morgan En  acompte  sur  led*  Billet,     donne  aux  Cahos  led*  jour 

jer  ybre  jygy. 

La  Cour  est  adjournee  au  i^^  8^^^  1787. 

fr.  saucier  Presd*. 

a  une  Cour  du  premier  octobre  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  Sept. 
M*"^  francois  Saucier  presidant.         Philipe  angel 
ant^  girardin  Charles  Ducharme 

B*e  Saucier  p^^  Laperche 

Math.  Saucier  magistrats 

Jean  Bte  Morel  demandeur  contre  Ignace  Chatigny  deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  a  produit  un  compte  a  la  charge  du  deffendeur 
montant  a  la  somme  de  dixhuit  Cent  Cinquante  huit  livres  dix 
sols  En  argent. 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1787  305 

The  Court  condemned  the  plaintiff  to  pay  five  livres  to  the 
defendant  and  costs  and  charges  which  are  set  at  twenty  [twenty- 
five  ?]  livres,  for  which  there  will  be  execution. 

Costs. 

To  I  order  to  Biguier 5  lb 

I  order  to  Antaya 5 

To  huissier  who  carried  the  orders  ....  10 
To  the  judgment 5 


25  lb 
At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Clamorgan,  Plaintiff,  vs.  the  named  Duchesnau,  De- 
fendant. 
The  plaintiff  demands  of  the  defendant  payment  of  a  note  for 
the  sum  of  one  hundred  and  sixty-five  livres  in  peltries  assigned 
to  him  by  Louis  Chatelrau.,     The  said  note,  already  due,  was 
exhibited  to  the  Court.     Heard  the  defendant  who  said  that  he 
had  already  offered  to  pay;   but  that  they  had  not  been  able  to 
produce  his  note,  alleging  that  it  was  lost;  and  that  he  had  already 
paid  an  installment  to  M.  Labadie  on  a  copy  of  the  said  note  by 
order  of  M.  Cruzat,  commandant  at  St.  Louis.     Whereupon  the 
Court  condemned    the  defendant  to   pay  to  the  plaintiff    the 
amount  of  his  note,  saving  his  reimbursement  by  M.  Labadie, 
which  shall  be  paid  to  M.  Clamorgan  as  an  installment  on  the 
said  note.     Given  at  Cahokia  the  said  day,  September  i,  1787. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  October  i,  1787. 

Fr.  Saucier.  Pres. 

At  a  Court,  October  i,  1787. 
MM.  Francois  Saucier,  President.       Philippe  Engel 
Ant.  Girardin  Charles  DuCharme 

Bte.  Saucier  Pierre  Laperche 

Matt.  Saucier  Magistrates 

Jean  Bte.  Morel,  Plaintiff',  vs.  Ignace  Chatigny,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  exhibited  an  account  charged  to  the  defendant 
amounting  to  the  sum  of  eighteen  hundred  and  fifty-eight  livres 
ten  sols  in  money. 


3o6  ILLINOIS  filSTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Le  deffendeur  ayant  contests  plusieurs  articles  relatif  au 
commerce  quils  ont  fait  a  Kumberla  Et  dans  leur  voyage  que  la 
Cour  na  pas  Eclairier  et  quelle  ne  Croit  pas  pouvoir  decider  plaine- 
ment.  EUe  Renvoy  les  deux  parties  a  Se  Nommer  chacun  un 
arbitres  pour  decider  de  leur  contestations  depens  reservez 
jusques  a  la  sentence  arbitrale  qui  sera  homologud  par  la 
Cour. 

La  Cour  est  ajoum^e  au  2.  9^^^  1787. 

fr.  saucier  Presid*. 

a  une  Cour  du  2.  9^^"^  1787. 
M"  frs  Saucier  presidant  philipe  angel 

antoine  girardin  mathieu  Saucier 

a  la  dite  cour  a  Et6  homologud  Et  Ratifier  la  Nomination  Et 
Election  dune  Cour  a  la  belle  fontaine  Et  officier  de  milice  com- 
prenant  les  habitants  recident  [?]  De  la  Riviere  de  Laigle. 
En  se  Conformant  a  la  decizion  de  la  Cour.  du  i^^  octobre 
dernier. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
Nicolas  Schemitz  a  fait  Sermant  dofice  de  juge  a  paix  p^  le 
grand  Ruisseau. 

a  la  meme  Cour  William  Biggs  a  fait  Sermant  doffice  p^  juge 
a  paix  a  la  Belle  fontaine. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
Le  S^  arondel  demandeur  Contre  Joseph  Vaudry  son  Engage 
Le  demandeur  a  presente  une  requete  portant  que  le  deffendeur 
son  Engage  cherche  a  le  quiter  quil  requiere  que  led*  vaudry 
luy  payd  quatre  cent  quarante  quatre  livres  quil  luy  doit  Et  de 
luy  fournir  un  homme  capable  de  le  remplacer.  ou  quil  Continue 
son  voyage  Sous  une  Caution  suffisante  Sur  quoy  led*  vaudry 
a  repondu  quil  Etoit  trop  mecontent  de  la  societe  mais  quil  ne  se 
plaignoit  pas  du  s^  arondel  Et  quil  ne  vouloit  plus  rester  sur  quoy 
la  cour  a  Condamne  led*  vaudry  a  payer  la  somme  ici  dessus  p^ 

1  See  Introduction,  p.  cxlix. 

2  William  Arundel  was  an  Irish  merchant  from  Canada.  He  resided  at  Peoria  for  a  time, 
then  moved  to  Cahokia  and  later  to  Kaskaskia,  where  he  died  in  1816. —  Rejmolds,  Pioneer 
History,  102. 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1787  307 

The  defendant  having  disputed  several  articles  relative 
to  the  business  which  they  had  made  in  Cumberland  and 
on  their  journey,  which  the  Court  was  not  able  to  clear  up 
and  which  it  believes  itself  unable  to  decide  completely,  the 
Court  dismissed  the  two  parties  to  name  each  an  arbitrator 
in  order  to  decide  their  disputes,  costs  being  reserved  until 
the  verdict  of  the  arbitrators,  which  will  be  confirmed  by  the 
Court. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  November  2,  1787. 

Fr.  Saucier  Pres. 
At  a  Court,  November  2,  1787. 
MM.  Fr.  Saucier,  President      Philippe  Engel. 
Antoine  Girardin.  Matthieu  Saucier. 

At  the  said  Court  was  confirmed  and  ratified  the  nomination 
and  election  of  a  court  at  Bellefontaine  and  an  officer  of  militia 
which  includes  the  inhabitants  residing  on  the  Eagle  River,  in 
conformity  with  the  decision  of  the  Court  of  the  ist  of  October 
last. 

At  the  same  court. 

Nicolas  Smith  made  oath  of  office  as  justice  of  peace  for  the 
Grand  Ruisseau. 

At  the  same  Court  William  Biggs  took  the  oath  of  office  as 
justice  of  the  peace  at  Bellefontaine.^ 

At  the  same  Court. 

M.  Arundel,^  Plaintiff,  vs,  Joseph  Vaudry,  his  employ^. 

The  plaintiff  presented  a  petition,  which  declares  that  the  de- 
fendant, his  engag^,  is  seeking  to  leave  him  and  he  prays  that  the 
said  Vaudry  pay  him  four  hundred  and  forty-four  livres  which 
he  owes  and  furnish  the  plaintiff  a  man  capable  of  replacing 
him,  or  that  he  continue  his  journey  under  sufficient  bond. 
Whereupon  the  said  Vaudry  answered  that  he  was  too  discon- 
tented with  the  company;  but  that  he  did  not  complain  of  M. 
Arundel;  and  that  he  did  not  wish  to  remain  longer.  Where- 
upon the  Court  condemned  the  said  Vaudry  to  pay  the  above 
sum  for  his  account  and  to  furnish  a  man  in  his  place  to  the 
said  M,  Arundel,  and  ordered  that  he  be  held  in  prison  until  he 


3o8  ILLINOIS  ^HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

son  compte  Et  a  fournir  un  homme  En  sa  place  aud*  S'"  arondel 
et  tiendra  prison  jusqua  ce  quil  a  y  trouve  caution  suffisante  Et 
le  condamnons  aux  frais  Et  depens. 

La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  i^^  decembre  prochain. 

fr.  saucier 
Du  12.  9^^^  iy87_ 
a  une  Cour  tenue  Extraordinairement. 
M™  fr  Saucier  presidant  B*^  Saucier 

ant,  girardin  Math,  saucier 

Philipe  angel  Et  p^^  Laperche 

Le  S^  JEAN  B*^  LaCroix  au  Nome  Et  Comme  fond^  de  la 
procuration  de  P^®  Lafleur  Et  de  celle  de  Thom  Brady  huissier 
demandeur  Contre 

La  Succession  de  deffunt  augustin  dubuq. 

ouy  led*  S^  jean  B*^  LaCroix  p^  led*  pierre  Lafleur  concluand 
a  ce  que  la  Sucession  de  deffunt  augustin  dubuque  luy  paye  les 
domage  quil  luy  a  Cause  par  un  baril  de  poudre  qui  a  fait  sauter 
Sa  maison  la  perte  de  Ses  meubles  les  pensements  du  Chirugien 
tant  p^  luy  que  pour  sa  femme  Blesse  dangerusem*  loger  de  sa 
maison  et  autres  domages  quil  soufre  Le  tout  examine  et  la  Cour 
ayant  plaines  Connoissance  de  la  maison  qui  a  Saute  par  les  de- 
positions des  temoins.  La  Cour  a  ordonne  et  ordonne  que  la 
Sucession  dud*  s^  dubuque  payera  priviligierement  la  maison  le 
prix  quelle  a  Coute.  qui  est  de  Seize  Cent  livres  En  argent  quil 
sera  fait  un  Etat  sermante  par  led*  lafleur  des  Effets  Et  meubles 
quil  a  perdu  et  qui  se  sont  trouvez  Casses  dans  sa  maison 
qui  a  Saute,  par  deux  arbitres  Nommez  par  la  Cour  qui  presteront 
sermant  p^  leur  estimation  etre  pay6  par  ladite  Sucession,  quil 
luy  sera  paye  le  memoire  du  Chirugien  tant  pour  luy  que  p^  sa 
femme  jusqua  parfaite  guerison,  quil  luy  sera  aloue  p^  ses  journees 
depuis  que  sa  maison  a  Saute  Et  p^  pertes  du  son  tems  la  somme 
de  trois  Cent  livres.  Et  p^  tout  loyers  de  maisons.  Et  autres 
repetitions  la  somme  de  Cent  Cinquante  livres  une  fois  paye  au 

1  If  the  arrest  was  for  debt  instead  of  for  the  desertion,  this  is  the  first  case  of  _  such 
imprisonment  in  the  Record.  It  was  due  to  the  increasing  influence  of  the  Americans. 
French  law  did  not  permit  imprisonment  for  debt  to  a  private  person  except  for  special 
causes,  and  then  only  after  a  lapse  of  forty  days  after  the  rendering  of  judgment. —  Ordi- 
nance of  Louis  XIV.,  April,  1667,  in  Isambert,  Anciennes  lois  franfaises,  xviii.,  172. 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1787  309 

has  found  sufficient  surety  therefor^;  and  we  condemn  him  to 
pay  the  costs  and  charges. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  the  ist  of  December  next. 

Fr.  Saucier 


'  November  12,  1787. 

At  a  special  session  of  the  Court. 
MM.  Fr.  Saucier,  President.     Bte.  Saucier. 
Ant.  Girardin.  Matt.  Saucier. 

Philippe  Engel.  and  Pierre  Laperche. 

M.  Jean  Bte.  Lacroix,  attorney  of  Pierre  Lafleur  and  of 
Thomas  Brady,  Huissier,  plaintiff, 

vs. 

the  Estate  of  the  deceased  Augustin  Dubuque. 

Heard  the  said  M.  Jean  Bte.  Lacroix,  for  the  said  Lafleur,  who 
concludes  that  the  estate  of  the  deceased  Augustin  Dubuque 
should  pay  him  for  the  damages  which  Dubuque  caused  by  a  barrel 
of  powder  which  blew  up  his  house,  for  the  loss  of  his  personal 
property,  and  for  the  dressing  of  the  wounds  by  the  surgeon 
not  only  his  own  but  those  of  his  wife  who  was  dangerously 
injured,  and  for  the  rent  of  his  house  and  for  other  damages, 
from  which  he  suffers.  After  all  was  examined  and  the  Court  had 
complete  knowledge  of  the  house,  which  was  blown  up,  from 
the  testimony  of  witnesses,  the  Court  decreed  and  does  decree 
that  the  estate  of  the  said  M.  Dubuque  shall  pay  by  preference 
its  cost  price,  sixteen  hundred  livres  in  money;  that  there  shall 
be  made  a  sworn  statement  by  the  said  Lafleur  of  the  goods  and 
chattels,  which  he  lost,  and  an  appraisal  of  those  which  are  bro- 
ken in  his  house,  which  was  blown  up,  by  two  arbitrators  named 
by  the  Court,  all  of  which  is  to  be  paid  by  the  said  estate;  that 
there  shall  be  paid  the  bill  of  the  surgeon  as  well  for  his  as  for  his 
wife's  care  until  their  perfect  cure;  that  there  shall  be  allowed  him 
for  his  day's  wages,  for  the  loss  of  his  time  since  his  house  was  blown 
up,  the  sum  of  three  hundred  livres,  and  for  all  rent  of  houses  and 
other  claims  the  sum  of  one  hundred  and  fifty  livres,  in  full  satis- 
faction for  all  damages  up  to  the  present  time.     The  said  house 


3IO  ILLINOIS  •HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

moyen  du  present  des  domagement  la  dite  maison  sautee  avec 
tous  Ses  materaux  Et  terain  Et  tout  ce  qui  y  est  atache  a  la  reserve 
des  Clostures  que  lafleur  En  levera,  Resteront  p^  le  compte  de  la 
sucession  dud*  s^  dubuque  Et  quand  au  Regard  de  thorn  Bredy 
la  Cour  luy  aloue  sur  la  dite  sucession  dix  livres  par  jour  pendant 
deux  mois  a  compter  du  jour  que  la  maison  a  Saute  Et  le  paye- 
ment  des  hardes  quil  avoit  sur  le  Corp  lors  quil  a  saut^  au  dire 
dexpert  Et  En  outre  les  frais  du  chirugien  pensement  traite- 
ment  Et  medicament  p^  tous  des  domagements  Condamne  la  Suces- 
sion En  tous  les  frais  de  present  extraordinaire  ce  qui  sera  Exe- 
cute Et  permis  aux  dits  demandeurs  de  prendre  En  acompte  ou 
p^  tout  sil  le  jugent  a  propos  des  effets  a  lencan  de  la  suc- 
cession lors  que  la  vente  sen  sera  au  plus  offrant  et  dernier 
Encherisseur  donne  En  Cour  led*  jour  12.9^'"^  1787. 

[Signed]     a*  Girardin  pierre  Laperche 

Phillipe  Engel  mth  Saucier 

B  Saucier  f.  saucier 

Labuxiere  grefier 

a  une  Cour  du  i^^  decembre  1787. 
M""^  fs.  Saucier  presidant 
ant  girardin  Math.  Saucier 

Philipe  angel  p'"^  Laperche 

B*^  saucier 
M^  ant^  Reilhe  sest  presente  a  la  Cour  comme  fonde  de  pro- 
curation du  s^  pierre  Gamelin  Creancier  de  defifunt  augustin 
dubuque  Comme  dernier  Equipeur  Suivant  les  pieces  quil  a 
produit  a  la  dite  Cour.  Et  Sa  requete  du  9.9^^^  dernier  apointee 
par  M^  saucier  presidant. 

La  Cour  ayant  murement  Examine  EUe  a  rectie  le  s^  Reilhe  en 
sa  dite  qualite  au  Nombre  des  Creanciers  de  Canada.  Et  a  decide 
Et  decide  que  toutes  les  debtes  cr6es  aux  cahos  Et  sur  cette  partie. 

1  The  settlement  of  the  estate  of  Augtrstin  Dubuque  occupies  the  attention  of  the  Court 
for  many  sessions.  See  pp.  313,  323,  37i,  375,  378,  393,429.  5i3-  Dubuque  was  a  trader  from 
Canada  and  was  probably  from  the  same  family  as  Julien  Dubuque,  the  first  settler  in  what 
is  now  Dubuque,  Iowa. — Tass^,  Les  Canadiens  de  I'ouest,  i,  239.  From  the  records  of  the 
various  cases  against  his  estate,  it  appears  that  Augustin  Dubuque  died  on  November  8,  1787, 
from  the  effects  of  an  explosion  of  a  keg  of  gunpowder.  His  wife,  Archange  Pratte,  was  living 
in  Canada  at  the  time  of  the  accident,  and  in  later  cases  her  rights  in  the  estate  were  carefully 
safeguarded  by  the  Court. 


COURT  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1787  311 

which  was  blown  up  with  all  its  materials  and  land  and  all  that 
which  is  attached  to  it,  with  the  exception  of  the  fences  which 
Lafleur  shall  clear  away,  shall  stand  to  the  account  of  the  estate 
of  the  said  M.  Dubuque.  And  as  regards  Tom  Brady  the 
Court  allows  him  from  the  said  estate  ten  livres  a  day  for  two 
months  counting  from  the  day  that  the  house  was  blown  up  and  the 
payment  of  the  clothing  which  he  had  on  his  body,  when  he 
was  blown  up,  on  an  appraisal  by  experts  and  furthermore  the 
cost  of  the  surgeon  for  bandages,  treatment  and  medicine,  in  full 
satisfaction.  The  Court  condemned  the  estate  to  pay  all  the 
costs  of  the  present  special  session,  for  which  there  will  be  execu- 
tion. And  permission  is  given  to  the  said  plaintiffs  to  take  as  in- 
stallments or  for  the  whole  amount,  if  they  judge  it  expedient,  goods 
at  the  auction  of  the  estate,  when  sale  shall  be  made  thereof  to  the 
highest  bidder.  Given  in  Coiurt  the  said  day,  November  12, 1787.^ 
[Signed]    Ant.  Girardin.    .  Pierre  Laperche. 

Philippe  Engel.  Matt.  Saucier. 

B.  Saucier.  F.  Saucier. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk, 
At  a  Court,  December  i,  1787. 
MM.  Fr.  Saucier,  President. 
Ant.  Girardin.  Matt.  Saucier. 

Philippe  Engel.  Pierre  Leperche. 

Bte.  Saucier. 
M.  Ant.  Reilhe  presented  himself  in  Court  as  attorney  of  M. 
Pierre  Gamelin,  creditor  of  the  deceased  Augustin  Dubuque  and 
last  furnisher  of  supplies,  according  to  documents  which  he 
exhibited  to  the  said  Court  and  his  petition  of  the  9th  of  November 
last,  referred  by  M.  Saucier,  President.^ 

The  Court,  after  careful  examination,  received  M.  Reilhe  in  his 
said  title  among  the  number  of  creditors  from  Canada.  And  it 
decided  and  does  decide  that  all  debts  made  at  Cahokia  and  on 
this  side,  which  the  Court  has  ordered  to  be  paid  and  those  which 
it  may  order  paid  in  the  future,  which  shall  appear  legitimate, 

2  Among  western  traders  the  last  furnisher  of  supplies  was  a  preferred  creditor.  Pierre 
Gamelin  was  a  prominent  citizen  of  Vincennes  and  played  a  very  important  part  in  the  his- 
tory of  that  village  during  this  period. — Dunn,  Indiana,  passim. 


312  ILLINOIS  Historical  collections 

que  la  Cour  a  ordonn^  Etre  payees  et  celle  quelle  ordonne  par  la 
suite  qui  luy  paroitront  legitimes  seront  payees  provisoirement, 
privilegierement  Et  specialement.  tant  frais  fait  que  autres  de 
recouvrement  du  charge  de  ladite  succession.  Et  que  comme 
lencan  des  meubles  Et  Effets  de  ladite  sucession  a  Ete  fait  au 
terme  du  mois  davril  1789.  lors  que  led*  recouvrement  sera  fait 
les  Creanciers  de  Canada  misilimakinac  Et  autres  hor  de  notre 
district  Nommeront  Entreux  un  sindic  a  qui  il  Sera  Remis  le 
Relequat  restant  de  ladite  sucession.  toutes  fois  les  debtes 
contractus  En  notre  district  liquidees  lesquels  Sarrangeront 
Entreux  pour  leurs  affaires  concernant  le  Reliqua  de  ladite  suces- 
sion. Et  quil  sera  donne  avis  a  la  dame  veuve  dubuque  par  le  s^ 
Labuxiere  charge  de  ladite  sucession  a  la  dame  veuve  dubuque 
dEnvoyerses  droits  quelle  a  a  pretendre  si  toute  fois  EUe  en  a 
pour  etre  privilegierement  a  Elle  delivre  sur  le  restant  de  ladite 
sucession  si  toutes  fois  Elle  ne  les  a  pas  Recti  En  Canada.  Et 
jusques  aud*  terns  toute  la  Sucession  restera  En  lEtat  quelle  est 
a  la  gestion  du  S^  Labuxiere  Et  qui  agira  selon  quil  luy  sera 
ordonne  par  la  Cour.  Et  que  comme  il  se  presente  plusieurs 
Creanciers  qui  pretendent  avoir  tous  droits  de  privilege,  la  Cour 
na  pas  juge  a  propos  den  prendre  Connoissance  Et  Sarangeront 
Entreux  apres  quelle  aura  Recu  des  nouvelles  de  madame  dubuque 
p^  tous  recour  Enver  Elle  ou  la  Sucession  dud*  deffunt  ainsy  quil 
avizeront.  Et  ne  sera  tenu  led*  S'"  Labuxiere  de  Linsolvabilit^ 
des  debiteurs  ny  de  leur  depart  Furtiv  En  faisant  par  luy  ce  quil 
poura  p^  linterest  de  ladite  sucession  Et  quant  aux  Billets  invan- 
toriez  il  tachera  den  assurer  le  payement  par  ceux  qui  les  doivent 
p^  etre  payez  au  terme  de  Lencan  atendu  quil  ny  a  pas  dargent 
sur  la  place  Et  que  Lon  ne  peu  recevoir  de  danrees. 

fait  et  donne  En  cour  led*  jour  i^^  decembre  mil  sept  cent 
quatre  vingt  sept. 
[Signed] 

a*  girardin  mh  Saucier 

B  Saucier  pierre  Lapeche 

Phillipe  Engel  fr  saucier 

La  Cour  est  adjournee  a  i^^  Janvier  1787  [sic] 

fr.  saucier. 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1788  313 

shall  be  paid  provisionally,  by  preference  and  specially,  as  well  as 
the  costs  incurred  and  the  other  costs  of  recovery,  by  the  trustee  of 
the  said  estate:  and  that,  since  the  auction  of  goods  and  chattels  of 
the  said  estate  has  been  set  for  the  term  of  the  month  of  April, 
1789,  at  which  the  recovery  shall  be  made,  the  creditors  from 
Canada  and  Michillimackinac  and  others  outside  of  our  district 
shall  name  among  them  a  syndic,  to  whom  there  shall  be  remitted 
the  balance  which  remains  from  the  said  estate  —  however  after 
the  debts  contracted  in  our  district  have  been  paid  —  which 
creditors  shall  make  arrangements  among  themselves  for  their 
business  concerning  the  balance  of  the  said  estate;  and  that  notice 
shall  be  given  Madame  Dubuque,  widow,  by  M.  Labuxiere, 
trustee  of  the  said  estate,  to  send  whatever  just  claims  she  has  to 
make,  provided  she  has  any  to  be  paid  to  her  by  preference  from 
the  balance  of  the  said  estate,  and  provided  she  did  not  receive 
payment  in  Canada.  And  up  to  the  said  time  all  the  estate  shall 
remain  in  the  state  it  is  under  the  administration  of  M.  Labuxiere 
and  he  shall  act  according  as  he  shall  be  ordered  by  the  Court. 
And  as  there  have  presented  themselves  several  creditors,  all  of 
whom  pretend  to  have  privileged  rights,  the  Court  has  not  judged 
it  expedient  to  take  notice  of  them  and  they  shall  make  arrange- 
ments among  themselves,  after  the  Court  shall  have  received 
news  from  Madame  Dubuque,  for  all  recourse  against  her  or  the 
estate  of  the  deceased  even  as  they  shall  determine.  Nor  shall 
the  said  M.  Labuxiere  be  held  for  the  insolvency  of  the  debtors 
nor  for  their  secret  departure,  while  doing  what  he  can  for  the 
interest  of  the  said  estate;  and  as  to  the  inventoried  notes  he  shall 
endeavor  to  assure  the  payment  thereof  by  those  who  owe  them  and 
they  are  to  be  paid  at  the  time  of  the  auction,  seeing  that  there  is 
no  money  in  the  market  and  one  cannot  receive  payment  in  kind. 

Made  and  given  in  Court  the  said  day,  December  i,  1787. 

[Signed] 
Ant.  Girardin.  Matt.  Saucier. 

B.  Saucier.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Philippe  Engel.  Fr.  Saucier. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  January  i,  1788. 

Fr.  Saucier. 


314  ILLINOIS  Historical  collections 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
donne  un  ordre  a  la  demande  de  la  dame  janot  lapens^e  qui 
ordonne  a  Joseph  Lapensde  de  veiller  a  la  conservation  des  Biens 
de  Ses  Enfans  En  quality  de  Subrog^  tuteur  Et  ce  quil  ne  soit  Rien 
dissipee  a  peine  dEn  repondre  En  son  Nom  led*  ordre  a  luy 
signifiie  par  ladite  dame  janot  la  pens^e  ce  dit  jour. 

a*  Girardin. 

a  une  Cour  du  deux  Janvier  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt  huit. 
Les  S"  antoine  girardin  presidant  Charles  ducharme 
Philipe  angel  pierre  Laperche 

a  ladite  cour  assemblee  le  S'"  francois  Lapensee  a  Ete  recti 
magistra  au  lieu  et  place  du  S''  francois  Saucier  absent  et  prete  le 
Sermant  doffice  En  consequence. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
francois  Lonval  fils  a  presente  une  requete  pour  de  demander 
des  domagements   contre  la  Sucession  de  deffunt  augustin  du- 
buque  disant  avoir  ete  Blesse  lorsque  la  maison  de  lafleur  a  Saute 
par  les  poudre  dud*  dubuque. 

La  cour  la  deboutd  de  sa  demande  comme  accident  imprevu. 
La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  1^^  fevrier. 

a*  girardin  pres. 
a  une  Cour  du  premier  fevrier  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt  huit. 
M'"''  antoine  girardin  presidant  Math.  Saucier 

B*e  Saucier  P^^  LaPerche 

Philipe  angel  fr.  Lapensee 

Charle  ducharme 
Entre  le  S^  William  arondel  marchand  voyageur  demandeur 
Contre  Leon  Lepage  defifendeur. 
Le  demandeur  requierre  que  le  deffendeur  lui  paye  Son  billet 
Echu  de  la  somme  de  deux  cent  vingt  une  livres  dix  huit  sols  avec 
Linterest  et  frais. 

Le  deffendeur  a  repondli  N'avoir  de  quoy  payer  pour  le 
present. 

Sur  qouy  la  Cour  a  condamnd  led*  Leon  Lepage  a  payer  le 
demandeur  dicy  a  Son  depart  ou  de  luy  donner  des  assurances 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1788  315 

At  the  same  Court. 
Issued  on  the  prayer  of  Madame  Janot  Lapanc^  a  mandate 
which  orders  Joseph  Lapanc^,  in  his  oflSce  of  surrogate  guardian, 
to  look  to  the  preservation  of  the  property  of  her  children,  and 
to  see  to  it  that  there  be  nothing  wasted  on  pain  of  answering 
for  it  in  his  own  name.  The  said  mandate  was  served  on  him 
by  the  said  Madame  Janot  Lapanc^  this  day. 

Ant.  Girardin. 
At  a  Court,  January  2,  1788. 
MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President.      Charles  DuCharme 
Philippe  Engel  Pierre  Laperche 

At  the  said  Court  M.  Francois  Lapancd  has  been  received  as 
magistrate  in  place  of  M.  Francois  Saucier  absent,  and  has  taken 
oath  of  oflice  in  consequence. 

At  the  same  Court. 
Francois  Lonval  jr.  presented  a  petition,  demanding  damages 
from  the  estate  of  the  late  Augustin  Dubuque,  claiming  to  have 
been  wounded  when  the  house  of  Lafleur  was  blown  up  by  M. 
Dubuque's  powder. 

The  Court  denied  his  prayer  since  the  accident  was  unforeseen. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  February  i, 

Ant.  Girardin  Pres. 
At  a  Court,  February  i,  1788. 
MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President.      Matt.  Saucier. 
Bte.  Saucier.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Philippe  Engel.  Fr.  Lapancd. 

Charles  DuCharme. 
Mr.  William  Arundel,  traveling  trader.  Plaintiff,  vs.  Leon  Le- 
page, Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  demands  that  the  defendant  pay  him  his  note, 
which  is  due,  for  the  sum  of  two  hundred  and  twenty-one  livres 
eighteen  sols  with  interest  and  costs. 

The  defendant  answered  that  he  had  not  the  means  of  paying 
at  present. 

Whereupon  the  Court  condemned  the  said  Lepage  to  pay 
the  plaintiff  between  now  and  the  time  of  his  departure  or  to 


316  ILLINOIS  •HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

pour  recevoir  son  payement  aud*  terns  faute  de  quoy  la  presente 
sentence  sera  mise  a  execution  contre  le  deffendeur. 

la  Cour  la  condamne  aux  depens. 

La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  i®^  mars  1788. 

a*  Girardin. 

a  une  Cour  tenue  extraordinairement  le  21  fevrier  1788. 
M'*^  antoine  girardin  Presidant.        B*®  Saucier. 
Philipe  angel.  p'"^  Laperche. 

Mathieu  Saucier.  charle  ducharme. 

Entre  jean  Bte  Felix  demandeur  Contre  Francois  lapensee 

deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  presente  une  requete  contre  Le  Nomme  Ren^ 
Bouvet  exposant  quil  a  fait  Echange  de  Bien  avec  le  Nomme 
Rene  Bouvet  party  pour  le  Canada  pour  recevoir  Et  se  metre  en 
posession  du  bien  que  led*  philix  luy  a  echange  le  quel  Bien  led* 
philix  a  a  eux  des  nouvelles  Certaines  quil  avoit  Ete  remis  aud* 
Rene  Bouvet  par  une  lettre  quil  a  rec^i  de  son  tuteur  qui  luy  marque 
daler  recevoir  son  Bien  ladite  requete  jointe  cy  contre.  demandant 
que  francois  lapensee  ay  a  vuider  ses  mains  entre  les  siennes  des 
Billets  obligations  et  autres  Creances  que  led*  bouvet  luy  a  laisse 
en  depot  p^  luy  etre  delivre  En  Echange  du  bien  que  led*  felix 
luy  acedde  a  sorel  en  Canada  puisquil  est  certain  que  led*  Bouvet 
a  recu  le  Bien  Echange. 

Vu  la  Convention  faite  entre  led*  Bouvet  Et  led*  felix  au  bas 
de  leur  contract  dechange  par  lequel  led*  Bouvet  soblige  decrire 
lauthomne  de  1787  de  missilimakinac  a  francois  lapensee  sil  a 
recu  le  Bien  ou  sil  ne  la  pas  recu  ou  sil  y  a  aparance  de  Le  rece- 
voir ce  que  led*  Bouvet  a  manque  de  faire  jusqua  present  Et  a 
seulement  Ecrit  une  lettre  a  fr.  lapensee  de  luy  livrer  quelque 
Billets  Echus  a  Noel  dernier,  la  Cour  Etant  dans  lopinion  que 
led*  bouvet  a  pris  posession  du  Bien  Echange  par  son  silence  de 
donner  avis  aud*  La  pensee  ce  qui  fait  souffrir  un  retard  et  un  tor 
Considerable  aud*  felix.  le  tout  considere  Ladite  cour  a  con- 
damne led*  francois  Lapensee  de  vuider  Les  mains  de  toutes  les 
Creances  deposees  entre  ses  mains  par  led*  Bouvet  entre  celles 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1788       317 

give  him  assurances  of  receiving  his  payment  at  the  said  time; 
in  default  of  which  the  present  judgment  shall  be  put  in  execu- 
tion against  the  defendant. 

The  Court  condemned  him  to  pay  the  charges. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  March  i,  1788. 

Ant.  Girardin. 

At  a  Court  meeting  in  special  session,  February  21,  1788. 

MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President.      Bte.  Saucier. 

Philippe  Engel.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Matthieu  Saucier.  Charles  DuCharme. 

Jean  Bte  Felix,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Francois  Lapance,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  presents  a  petition  against  the  named  Ren^ 
Bouvet,  in  which  he  shows  that  he  made  an  exchange  of  prop- 
erty with  the  named  Rend  Bouvet,  who  has  gone  to  Canada  in 
order  to  receive  and  put  himself  into  possession  of  the  property 
which  the  said  Felix  exchanged  with  him;  and  the  said  Felix 
has  had  certain  news  that  it  had  been  delivered  to  the  said  Rene 
Bouvet  from  a  letter  which  he  has  received  from  his  guardian, 
who  informs  him  that  he  is  to  go  and  receive  his  property; 
and  he  presents  the  said  petition  joined  here  opposite,  in  which 
he  demands  that  Francois  Lapance  should  be  obliged  to  deliver  into 
his  hands  the  notes,  obligations  and  other  claims,  which  the  said 
Bouvet  left  with  him  on  deposit  to  be  delivered  to  the  plaintiff 
in  exchange  for  the  property  which  the  said  Felix  transferred  to 
him  at  Sorel  in  Canada,  since  it  is  certain  that  the  said  Bouvet 
has  received  the  property  exchanged. 

In  view  of  the  agreement  made  between  the  said  Bouvet  and 
the  said  Felix  at  the  bottom  of  their  contract  of  exchange  according 
to  which  the  said  Bouvet  pledged  himself  to  write  in  the  autumn 
of  1787  from  Michillimackinac  to  Francois  Lapancd,  if  he  re- 
ceived the  property  or  if  he  did  not  receive  it  or  if  there  was  likeli- 
hood of  receiving  it,  a  thing  which  the  said  Bouvet  has  failed  to 
do  up  to  the  present — he  has  only  written  a  letter  to  Fr.  Lapancd 
asking  the  latter  to  deliver  him  some  notes  due  last  Christmas — 
the  Court  is  of  the  opinion  that  the  said  Bouvet  has  taken  posses- 
sion of  the  property  exchanged,  judging  from  his  neglect  to  give 


3i8  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

dud*  philix  dont  il  sera  Bien  et  valablement  decharge  Enver  led* 
Bouvet  et  tous  autres  Et  retiendra  seulement  par  Ses  mains  le 
montant  des  sommes  qui  lui  ont  Etd  saisies  par  ordre  de  cette  Cour 
dues  par  led*  felix  pour  en  Compter  aux  saisissant  Retiendra 
pareillement  les  frais  de  saisies  qui  ont  Et^  fait  Et  de  Requetes  a 
payer  avec  la  presente  sentence  suivant  le  compte  qui  luy  sera 
fourni  par  le  grefier  dont  il  comptera.  En  diminution  sur  ce  quil 
aura  a  remetre  aud*  felix  ce  qui  sera  Execute  donn^  en  Cour  le 
dit  jour  21  fevrier  1788. 
[Signed] 
Ch.  duCharme  P  Laperche 

Phillipe  Engel  mth.  Saucier 

B  Saucier  a*  Girardin  P.sd. 


a  une  Cour  du  premier  mars  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt  huit. 
M^^  ant^  girardin  presidant  p^^  Laperche 

Philipe  angel  fr.  Lapensee 

Mathieu  Saucier  magistrats 

M^  TOURNIER  marchand  de  S*  Louis  demandeur  Contre 
FRANCOIS  Lapensee  deffendeur. 

Le  demandeur  demande  le  payement  dune  somme  de  deux 
mille  trois  cent  douze  livres  seize  sols  six  deniers  pour  restant  des 
marchandises  quil  luy  a  fourni  montant  En  total  a  onze  Cent 
quatre  vingt  trois  piastres  quatre  Escalins  Concluant  a  ce  que 
led*  francois  lapensee  Soit  condamne  a  le  payer  sous  quatre  jours 
avec  les  frais  Et  depens  dautant  quil  devoit  le  payer  au  mois  de 
Septembre  dernier  quil  a  atendu  jusqua  ce  jour  et  quil  est  actuelle- 
ment  sur  Son  depart  ne  pouvant  atendre  plus  longtems. 

Le  deffendeur  a  repondu  quil  ne  pouvoit  Contraindre  les 
meunier  a  moudre  son  bled  p'*  satisfaire  quil  avoit  asses  de  blee 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1788  319 

notice  to  the  said  Lapanc^,  and  that  this  causes  the  said  Felix 
to  suffer  a  delay  and  a  considerable  wrong;  and  after  considering 
the  whole  case,  the  said  Court  condemned  the  said  Francois 
Lapanc^  to  deliver  all  assets  deposited  in  his  hands  by  the  said 
Bouvet  into  the  hands  of  the  said  Felix,  of  which  he  shall  be  well 
and  lawfully  discharged  toward  the  said  Bouvet  and  all  others; 
and  he  shall  retain  in  his  hands  only  the  amount  of  the  sums 
which  have  been  attached  by  order  of  this  Court,  due  by  the  said 
Felix  in  order  to  account  therefor  to  the  judgment  creditor;  and 
he  shall  retain  likewise  the  costs  of  seizures,  which  have  been 
made,  and  of  the  petitions,  which  are  to  be  paid  with  the  present 
decree  according  to  the  account,  which  will  be  furnished  him 
by  the  clerk,  of  which  he  shall  render  an  account  by  subtracting 
from  that  which  he  ought  to  remit  to  the  said  Felix,  for  which 
there  will  be  execution. 

Given  in  Court  the  said  day  and  year,  February  21,  1788. 
[Signed] 

Ch.  DuCharme.  P.  Laperche. 

Philippe  Engel.  Matt.  Saucier. 

B.  Saucier.  Ant.  Girardin.  Pres. 

At  a  Court,  March  i,  1788. 

MM.  Ant.  Girardin.  President.        Pierre  Laperche. 

Philippe  Engel.  Fr.  Lapancd. 

Matthieu  Saucier.  Magistrates. 

M.  TouRNiER,  trader  from  St.  Louis,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Francois 
Lapance,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  demands  the  payment  of  a  sum  of  two  thousand 
three  hundred  and  twelve  livres  sixteen  sols  six  deniers  for  the 
residue  of  the  merchandise  which  he  furnished  the  defendant,  the 
total  amounting  to  eleven  hundred  and  eighty-three  piastres  four 
escalins  and  he  concludes  that  the  said  Francois  Lapance  should 
be  condemned  to  pay  it  within  four  days  together  with  the  costs 
and  charges,  inasmuch  as  he  should  have  paid  it  in  the  month  of 
September  last,  and  for  which  the  plaintiff  has  waited  until  today; 
and  he  says  that  he  is  now  about  to  take  his  departure  and  is 
unable  to  wait  longer. 


320  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

p^  Satisfaire  En  farine  comme  il  sy  Etoit  oblige  requerant  quil 
luy  soit  accorde  un  plus  long  delais  afin  que  les  meuniers  puissent 
luy  faire  sa  farine,  que  la  Surcharge  de  bled  du  public  dans  lesd* 
moulins  est  Cause  quil  na  pu  faire  son  payement  jusqua  ce  jour. 

La  Cour  ayant  Examine  les  circonstances  ou  les  moulins  ne 
peuvent  pas  fournir  au  besoin  du  public  elle  accorde  quinze  jours 
de  delais  au  deffendeur  p^  faire  son  parfait  payement.  passe 
Lequel  tems  la  condamne  a  payer  Sans  autres  delais  la  condamne 
aux  depens  Et  la  presente  sera  Exceute. 

La  Cour  est  adjournee  au  i^^  avril  1788. 

A*  Girardin  Psd 


a  une  Cour  du  Cinq  avril  mil  sept  Cent  quatre  vingt  huit. 
M'"''  antoine  girardin  Presd^      Math,  saucier 
Philipe  angel  fr.  Lapensee 

Charles  ducharme 

Le  S^  Jean  B*^  LaCroix  sest  presente  p^  faire  Rendre  compte 
au  s''  aime  comte  du  bien  de  Joseph  Comte  dont  il  est  Curateur 
suivant  la  sentence  Rendue  par  la  deniere  Cour.  led^  aime  comte 
ne  paroissant  pas  ainsi  quil  luy  a  Ete  Enjoint. 

Elle  requiere  M^  Barbeau  lieutenant  de  comte  demeurant  a  la 
p'"*^  du  Rocher  dordonner  et  faire  partir  led^  aime  Compte  d'icy 
au  vingt  du  mois  p^  se  rendre  a  cette  Cour  Et  rendre  comte  des 
Biens  dud*  mineur  donne  par  la  Cour  led*  jour  Et  an. 
a  la  meme  Cour. 

Joseph  Worley  Et  james  Piggot  ont  represente  quils  Etoient 
Caution  pour  james  moore  de  la  belle  fontaine  p^  une  somme  de 
Cinq  cent  piastres  p^  deux  Esclaves  noir  que  led*  more  a  achete 
des  mineurs  de  deffunt  jhon  Ellison  Et  quils  craignent  par  le 
derrangement  des  affaires  dud*  more  quil  ne  devienne  insolvable 
requerant  p^  leur  surete  a  Etre  decharge  du  Cautionment  dautant 
quil  y  a  un  des  negres  de  mort  Entre  les  mains  dud*  more  sur 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1788  321 

The  defendant  answered  that  he  had  been  unable  to  compel 
the  millers  to  grind  his  wheat  so  as  to  satisfy  this  claim  and 
that  he  had  enough  wheat  to  satisfy  it  in  flour  as  he  had 
pledged  himself  to  do.  He  prays  that  there  be  accorded  him 
a  longer  delay  until  the  millers  can  make  his  flour  and  says 
that  the  extra  amount  of  wheat  belonging  to  the  public  in  the 
said  mills  is  the  cause  of  his  being  unable  to  make  his  payment 
up  to  this  day. 

The  Court,  having  examined  the  conditions  and  learning  that 
the  mills  were  not  able  to  supply  the  need  of  the  public,  granted 
fifteen  days  delay  to  the  defendant  to  make  complete  payment, 
after  which  time  he  is  condemned  to  pay  without  other  delay. 
Condemned  him  to  pay  costs.  For  this  present  there  will  be  exe- 
cution. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  April  i,  1788. 

Ant.  Girardin,  Pres. 
At  a  Court,  April  5,  1788. 
MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President.  Matt.  Saucier. 

Philippe  Engel.  Fr.  Lapancd. 

Charles  DuCharme. 

M.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix  presented  himself  to  compel  M.  Aim^ 
Comte  to  render  account  of  the  property  of  Joseph  Comte,  of 
which  he  is  guardian,  according  to  the  sentence  passed  by  the 
last  Court.  The  said  Aim^  Comte  did  not  appear  although  he 
had  been  cited. 

The  Court  requires  M.  Barbau,  county  lieutenant,  dwelling 
at  Prairie  du  Rocher,  to  order  and  compel  the  said  Aime  Comte 
to  leave  and  come  here  on  the  twentieth  of  the  month  to  submit 
himself  to  this  Court  and  render  account  of  the  property  of  the 
said  minor. 

Given  by  the  Court  the  said  day  and  year. 
At  the  same  Court. 

Joseph  Worley  and  James  Piggott  set  forth  that  they  were 
bondsmen  for  James  Moore  of  Bellefontaine  for  the  sum  of  five 
hundred  piastres  for  two  black  slaves  which  the  said  Moore 
bought  of  the  minors  of  the  late  John  Allison,  and  that  they 


322  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

quoy  la  Cour  ayant  deliberd  ordonne  quil  sera  Saisy  provisoire- 
ment  un  des  negres  restant  Et  suffisament  des  autres  Biens  dud* 
more  p^  Remplacer  celui  qui  manque  le  tout  provisoirement  Et 
paroitra  led*  more  devant  la  Cour  le  i^^  may  prochain  pour  de- 
duire  Ses  raisons  sil  en  a  aleguer  pour  En  Etre  ordonne  par  notre 
dite  Cour  ce  quil  apartiendra. 

La  Cour  est  ajourn^e  au  i^^  may  1788. 

A*  Girardin  psd. 


a  une  Cour  du  Sept  may  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  huit. 
M^^  antoine  girardin  Presidant         B*^  Saucier 
Math.  Saucier  francois  Lapens^e 

Philipe  angel  cons^""^  Magistrats. 

Le  S^  Izidore  laCroix  marchand  de  Canada  Sest  presente  par 
sa  requete  de  cejourdhuy  a  luy  remise  demandant  qu'en  vcrtu  de 
la  saisie  quil  a  fait  faire  des  Biens  de  monsieur  dubuque  En  datte 
du  huit  Novembre  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  sept  Et  la  sentence 
de  la  Cour  du  douze  Novembre  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  Sept 
Rendue  En  consequence  qui  luy  aloue  Son  compte  et  obligation 
comme  premier  saisissant  montant  a  la  somme  de  Cinq  mille 
trente  neuf  livres  six  sols  six  deniers,  la  Cour  a  ordonne 
Et  ordonne  que  led*  demandeur  sera  recu  Creanciers  privilegie 
apres  les  debtes  payees  contracte  aux  ilinois  dedomagements 
frais  de  justice  et  Droits  de  madame  dubuq  prelevez.  Et  la 
renvoye  jusques  apres  le  recouvrement  donnd  par  la  Cour  lesd* 
jour  Et  an. 

Ensuit  la  Note  des  Billet  et  obligation  que  led*  s^  La- 
Croix a  present^  avec  notre  sentence  au  bas  en  original  qui  luy 
a  Ete  remise  a  la  Cour  du  douze  9^^®  mil  sept  cent  quatre 
vingt  sept. 

1  There  is  no  record  of  such  a  decree  except  in  this  place. 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1788  323 

feared  on  account  of  the  disorder  of  the  affairs  of  the  said 
Moore  less  he  should  become  insolvent;  and  they  pray  for 
their  safety  to  be  discharged  from  their  surety  inasmuch  as 
one  of  the  negroes  has  died  on  the  hands  of  the  said  Moore. 
Whereupon  the  Court,  after  having  deliberated,  decrees  that 
there  shall  be  seized  provisionally  the  remaining  negro  and 
a  sufficient  amount  of  the  other  property  of  the  said  Moore 
to  replace  the  one  who  is  dead,  all  provisionally;  and  that 
the  said  Moore  shall  appear  before  the  Court  on  the  first 
of  May  next  to  state  his  claims  if  he  has  any  to  plead  in  order 
that  this  affair  may  be  settled  by  our  said  Court  as  may  be 
fitting. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  May  i,  1788. 

Ant.  Girardin,  Pres. 
At  a  Court,  May  7,  1788. 
MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President.      Bte.  Saucier. 
Matth.  Sauicer.  Francois  Lapancd. 

Philippe  Engel.  Councilors  and  Magistrates. 

M.  Isidore  LaCroix,  trader  from  Canada,  presented  himself 
by  his  petition  of  this  day,  which  has  been  returned  to  him,  in 
which  he  prays  that,  in  virtue  of  the  seizure,  which  he  has  made 
of  the  goods  of  M.  Dubuque  under  date  of  November  8,  1787,  and 
of  the  decree  of  the  Court  of  November  12,  seventeen  hundred 
and  eighty-seven^  rendered  in  consequence,  which  allows  him  the 
account  and  note  due  him  as  first  execution  creditor  and  which 
amounts  to  the  sum  of  five  thousand  and  thirty-nine  livres  six 
sols  and  six  denier s,  [execution  be  made].  The  Court  decreed  and 
does  decree  that  the  said  plaintiff  shall  be  received  as  preferred 
creditor,  after  the  payment  of  the  debts  contracted  in  the  Illinois, 
the  damages,  costs  of  justice,  and  just  claims  of  Madame  Dubuque 
have  been  deducted;  and  dismissed  him  until  after  the  collection. 
Given  by  the  Court  the  said  day  and  year. 

There  follows  the  memorandum  of  notes  and  obligations  which 
the  said  M.  Lacroix  presented,  with  our  decree  written  at  the 
bottom  of  the  original,  which  was  returned  to  him  at  the  Court 
of  November  12,  1787. 


324  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

La  Cour  aloue. 

Doit  m^  augustin  dubuque  a  Joseph  LaCroix  et  gigon. 

par  un  billet      4046  .7  •( 

par  un  bon    29  . 

par  un  billet  par  un  bon 156  . 

ma  Commission  des  affaires  que  jay  gere  p^  lui  En 

Canada i75  -3 

9  [letters  illegible],  f  gros  tour  fleury 280  .16 

paye  au  sergent  m^  Conet 12  . 


4699  6  .6 

Sauf  Erreur  et  obmission  le  14  aoust  1787  signd  Joseph  La- 
Croix p^  gigon. 

La  Cour  aloue  le  present  compte  Comme  premier  saisissant  Et 
apres  les  Creances  de  des  domagement  payees  Et  accordees 
cejourdhuy  autant  quil  y  aura  des  fonds  aux  Cahos  de  plus  trois 
Cent  quarante  livres  p'"  un  Compte  de  fourniture  accepte  par 
deffunt  dubuque  donne  aux  Cahos  le  douze  Novembre  mil  sept 
cent  quatre  vingt  Sept.  signe  Math.  Saucier,  pierre  Laperche, 
B*^  Saucier,  Philipe  Engel,  antoine  girardin,  fr  Saucier  presi- 
dant  a  luy  remis  ladite  Sentence  signee  des  dits  magistrats  cy 
dessus. 

a  la  meme  Cour  le  S^  Reilhe  Sest  presente  avec  Lecrit  dont 
copie  suit  et  a  luy  remis  loriginal. 

Je  prie  M^  Labuxiere  de  mexpedier  la  Sentence  de  la  Cour 
qui  accorde  le  des  domagement  aux  incendies. 

Secondement  la  Sentence  qui  renvoy  les  Creanciers  de  mon- 
treal  p^  discuter  leurs  privileges,  troisiemement  le  montant  de  la 
vente.  4^  le  montant  du  bled,  farine,  mahis  et  lard.  5^  le  mon- 
tant des  billets  obligation  et  comptes  a  S^  Louis  le  i^^  [?]  avril  1788. 
VEU  par  la  Cour  assemblee  ce  jourdhuy  elle  deffend  au  s^  Labux- 
iere De  rendre  aucun  Compte  de  ladite  succession  ny  de  delivrer 
aucunnes  pieces  qua  celuy  qui  sera  Nomme  sindic  de  ladite  suces- 
sion  lors  que  les  recouvrement  seront  fait  Et  que  Ion  aura  recu  des 
Nouvelles  de  madame  dubuque.  Excepte  la  copie  de  la  sentence 
qui  renvoy  les  Creanciers  de  Canada  Envers  le  sindic  pour  sar- 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1788  325 

The  Court  allows: 
M.  Augustin  Dubuque  owes  Joseph  LaCroix  and  Gigon, 

by  a  note 4046 .7.6. 

by  a  bon 29. 

by  a  note  and  bon    156 . 

my  commission  for  business  which  I  managed 

for  him  in  Canada 175 .   3 

9  [letters  illegible]^  }  gros  tour  fleury 280.    16. 

paid  to  M.  Conet  sergeant    12 . 


4699.  6.  6. 

Saving  error  and  omission,  August  14,  1787.  Signed  Joseph 
LaCroix  for  Gigon. 

The  Court  allows  the  present  account  as  of  the  first  execution 
creditor  and  after  the  claims  allowed  to-day  for  damages  are  paid 
and  in  so  far  as  there  shall  be  funds  at  Cahokia  above  three 
hundred  and  forty  livres  for  an  account  of  supplies  accepted  by 
the  deceased  Dubuque.  Given  at  Cahokia  the  12th  of  November, 
1787.  Signed:  Matt.  Saucier,  Pierre  Laperche,  Bte.  Saucier, 
Philippe  Engel,  Antoine  Girardin,  Fr.  Saucier,  President.  Re- 
turned to  him  the  said  decree  signed  by  the  magistrates  afore- 
said. 

At  the  same  Court  M.  Reiehe  presented  himself  with  the 
writing,  a  copy  of  which  follows,  and  the  original  was  returned 
to  him. 

I  pray  M.  Labuxiere  to  draw  up  for  me  the  decree  of  the  Court 
which  allows  damages  to  the  sufferers  from  the  fire. 

Secondly  the  decree  which  dismisses  the  creditors  from  Mon- 
treal to  determine  their  privileges.  Thirdly  the  amount  of  the 
sale.  4th.  The  amount  of  wheat,  flour,  corn,  and  lard.  5th.  The 
amount  of  the  notes,  obligations,  and  accounts  at  St.  Louis,  the 
first  of  April,  1788.  This  having  been  examined  this  day  by  the 
assembled  Court,  it  forbids  M.  Labuxiere  to  render  any  account 
of  the  said  estate  or  to  deliver  any  documents  except  to  the  one 
who  shall  be  named  syndic  of  the  said  estate  at  the  time  the  col- 
lections shall  be  made  and  after  there  has  been  received  news 


326  ILLINOIS'HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

anger  Entreux  Et  jusqua  ce  que  la  dame  dubuque  ait  Envoy^ 
icy  sa  procuration  fait  Et  delivre  En  Cour  le  7.  may  1788. 
La  Cour  est  adjournee  au  i®^  juin  1788. 

A*  Girardin 


a  une  Cour  de  deux  juin  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  huit. 

M"  antoine  girardin  Presidant     Math.  Saucier 

Philipe  angel  p^®  Laperche 

Charle  ducharme  fr.  Lapens^e 

B^^  Saucier 
Le  S^  Worlay  habitant  de  la  belle  fontaine  Sest  presente 
declarant  que  contre  les  ordres  de  cette  cour  le  S^  more  de  la  belle 
fontaine  Sest  refuse  de  luy  donner  caution  a  Satisfaction  p^  surete 
des  sommes  quil  doit  aux  mineurs  Ellezon  dont  il  est  caution, 
la  Cour  ordonne  que  le  S^  more  donnera  Bonne  Et  solvable 
caution  aud*  Worlay  qui  assurera  Solidement  les  sommes  quil 
doit  aux  dits  mineurs  Et  ce  dans  tout  le  Courant  de  ce  present 
mois.  Et  a  faute  dy  saitsfaire  Nous  Enjoignons  a  notre  huissier 
tom  bredy  de  se  transporter  le  deux  ou  trois  de  juillet  prochain 
pour  proceder  par  voy  de  Saisies  et  execution  sur  les  Biens  dud^  s^ 
more  et  effets  a  luy  apartenants  lesquels  Effets,  negres,  Bestiaux 
il  transferera  aux  Cahos  p''  etre  vendus  judicierement  a  la  porte  de 
PEglise  au  plus  offrant  Et  dernier  Encherisseur  p'"  largent  En 
provenant  Etre  pris  Et  preleve  la  somme  que  led^  more  doit  aux 
dits  mineurs  interest  frais  de  justice  Conts  [sic]  Et  mise  dexecution 
ce  qui  sera  Execute  donne  En  Cour  lesd^  jour  Et  an.  Et  En  Cas  de 
resistance  la  Cour  donnera  tout  main  forte  p'^  lexecution  de  ses 
ordres. 
[Signed] 

pierre  Laperche  francois  Lapance 

B  Saucier  Mth  Saucier 

Phillipe  Engel  DuCharme 

A*  Girardin  psd. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1788  327 

from  Madame  Dubuque,  except  the  copy  of  the  decree  which  dis- 
missed the  Canadian  creditors  to  a  syndic  to  make  arrangements 
among  themselves,  and  until  Madame  Dubuque  has  sent  here 
her  power  of  attorney.  Made  and  delivered  in  Court,  May  7, 
1788. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  June  i,  1788. 

Ant.  Girardin. 
At  a  Court,  June  2,  1788. 

MM.  Antoine  Girardin.  President.  Matt.  Saucier. 

Philippe  Engel.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Charles  DuCharme.  Fr.  Lapanc^. 

Bte.  Saucier. 
M.  Worley,  inhabitant  of  Bellefontaine,  presented  himself  and 
declares  that,  contrary  to  the  orders  of  this  Court,  M.  Moore  of 
Bellefontaine  has  refused  to  give  him  satisfactory  bond  for  surety 
for  the  sums  which  he  owes  the  minors  Allison,  for  which  he  is 
bondsman.  The  Court  decrees  that  M,  Moore  shall  find  for  the 
said  Worley  good  and  solvent  bondsman,  who  shall  substantially 
assure  the  sums,  which  he  owes  the  said  minors,  and  this  within 
the  course  of  this  present  month.  And  in  default  of  giving  satis- 
faction, we  command  our  huissier,  Tom  Brady,  to  go  thither  on 
the  second  or  third  of  next  July  and  proceed  to  attach  and  place 
under  execution  the  goods  of  the  said  M.  Moore  and  the  effects 
belonging  to  him;  which  effects,  negroes  and  cattle  he  shall  trans- 
port to  Cahokia  to  be  sold  by  judicial  sale  at  the  door  of  the  church 
to  the  highest  bidder;  and  from  the  money  obtained  there  shall 
be  taken  and  deducted  the  sum  which  the  said  Moore  owes  the 
said  minors  with  the  interest,  the  costs  of  justice  and  expenses  of 
the  execution,  for  which  there  will  be  execution.  Given  in  Court 
the  said  day  and  year.  And  in  case  of  resistance  the  Court  will 
give  all  assistance  to  the  execution  of  its  orders. 
[Signed'] 

Pierre  Laperche.  Matt.  Saucier. 

B.  Saucier.  DuCharme. 

Philippe  Engel.  Ant.  Girardin,  Pres. 

Francois  Lapancd. 


328  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
Hugh  Mc  D°  Chisholm  demandeur  Centre  Francois  Clark 

absent  ne  voulant  paroitre 
Le  demandeur  nous  a  represente  lordre  de  Saisie  Et  vente  des 
biens  par  la  Cour  ordonne  sur  Les  Biens  dud*  Clark,  lequel  se 
trouve  En  deffaud  dacomplir  le  parfait  payement  En  Consequance 
La  Cour  ordonne  au  S^  Schemitz  juge  a  paix  au  grand  Ruisseau  de 
donner  Ses  ordres  pour  faire  payer  sans  aucuns  delais  led*  Clark 
avec  tons  les  frais  Et  journ^^s  pas  Et  demarches  dud*  Hugh  Mc 
D°  Chisholm  Et  ly  [sic]  Contraindre  par  toute  Rigeur  de  justice 
donn^  En  Cour  lesd*  jour  Et  an. 

La  Cour  est  adjourn^e  au  i®^  juillet  1788. 

A*  Girardin. 
a  une  Cour  du  premier  juUiet  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  huit. 
M"  antoine  garardin  Presidant        p''®  Laperche 
Mathieu  Saucier  Charle  ducharme 

B*^  Saucier  francois  lapensee 

Magistrats 
PIERRE  Brisson  demandeur  Contre  Charles  Germain 
deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  demande  au    deffendeur  la  Somme  de  Soix- 
ante  dix  livres  pour  des  madriers  quil  lui  a  fait  et  quil  refuse  de 
recevoir. 

Le  deffendeur  a  repondii  quil  ne  les  luy  a  pas  fait  dans  le  tems 
quil  les  luy  avoit  demand^  Et  quil  ne  pouvoit  plus  les  prendre  vt 
les  grandes  Eaux  qui  lempechoit  de  les  Charoyer  quil  nen  avoit  plus 
Besoin.  Le  demandeur  a  replique  quil  luy  avoit  dit  de  venir  les 
recevoir  avant  les  grandes  Eaux.  ce  que  le  deffendeur  a  desnie 
Le  demandeur  a  offert  preuve  a  linstant  a  fait  paroitre  michel 
peltier  dit  antaya  lequel  a  pris  sermant  sur  les  S*^  Evangiles  de 
dire  la  verite  Sur  laffaire  dont  est  question  a  dit  quil  a  connois- 
sance  quil  avoit  fait  marche  Ensemble  pour  Soixante  livres  et 
que  Brisson  luy  devoit  faire  des  madriers  p^  cette  somme  p^  sa 
Batterie  qui  est  tout  ce  quil  a  dit  savoir  sur  cette  declaration 
Sur  cette  declaration  Brisson  a  dit  quil  a  avoit  [sic]  offert  a  germain 
de  luy  livrer  Ces  madriers  led*  germain  a  dit  de  faire  sermant  de 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1788  329 

At  the  same  Court. 
Hugh  McD.  Chisholm,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Francis  Clark,  absent, 
refusing  to  appear. 
The  plaintiff  sets  forth  to  us  that  the  goods  of  the  said  Clark, 
against  which  the  writ  for  the  seizure  and  sale  of  goods  was  decreed 
by  the  Court,  are  found  to  be  insufficient  to  make  complete  pay- 
ment.    Consequently  the  Court  orders  M.  Smith,  justice  of  the 
peace  at  Grand  Ruisseau,  to  make  the  said  Clark  pay  without 
any  delay,  together  with  all  the  cost  and  wages  for  going  and  com- 
ing of  the  said  Hugh  McD.  Chisholm,  and  to  constrain  him  by 
all  rigor  of  the  law.     Given  in  Court  the  said  day  and  year. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  July  i,  1788. 

Ant.  Girardin. 
At  a  Court,  July  i,  1788. 
MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President.    Pierre  Laperche. 
Matthieu  Saucier.  Charles  DuCharme. 

Bte.  Saucier.  Francois  LaPance. 

Magistrats 
Pierre  Brisson,  Plaintiff,  vs,  Charles  Germain,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  demands  of  the  defendant  the  sum  of  seventy 
livres  for  joists,  which  he  made  for  him,  and  which  the  defendant 
refuses  to  accept. 

The  defendant  replied  that  the  plaintiff  had  not  made  them  in 
the  time  that  he  had  demanded  them  of  him,  and  that  he  could  no 
longer  get  them  seeing  that  the  high  water  prevented  him  carting 
them,  and  that  he  no  longer  had  need  of  them.  The  plaintiff  re- 
plied that  he  had  told  him  to  come  and  get  them  before  the  flood, 
a  thing  which  the  defendant  denied.  The  plaintiff  offered  proof. 
He  now  summoned  Michel  Pelletier  called  Antaya,  who  took  oath 
on  the  Holy  Gospels  to  tell  the  truth  in  regard  to  the  business  in 
question,  and  he  said  he  knew  that  they  had  made  agreement 
together  for  sixty  livres  and  that  Brisson  was  to  make  joists  for 
the  plaintiff's  thrashing-floor  for  that  sum,  which  is  all  that  he 
said  he  knew.  To  this  declaration  Brisson  said  that  he  had 
offered  Germain  to  deliver  to  him  these  joists.  The  said  Ger- 
main told  him  to  make  oath  on  what  he  put  forward,  which  the 


330  ILLINOIS' HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

ce  quil  avancoit,  ce  que  led*  Brisson  a  ofiFert  Et  a  fait  a  linstant 
son  sermant  sur  les  s*^  Evangiles, 

sur  quoy  la  Cour  condamn^  le  s'*  germain  a  recevoir  Et  pren- 
dre les  madriers  qui  seront  recus  par  arbitres  pour  etre  Bons  et 
recevables  de  trois  pouces  dEpaisseur  de  neuf  pied  de  long  Bois 
de  Hards  lesquels  seront  recus  demain  deux  de  ce  mois  Condam- 
nons  germain  aux  frais  et  depens. 

a  la  meme  cour. 
Le    Sr  Glamorgan  demandeur  Centre  Charles  Wood  amer- 
iquain  hab*  du  grand  Ruisseau  deffendant 

Le  demandeur  demande  que  la  maison  et  bled  froment  En 
semencez  sur  la  terre  de  Jacob  groot  app*  aud*  Wood  et  Saisis  a 
la  demande  dud*  s'"  de  Glamorgan  par  ordre  de  la  Cour  soient 
vendus  jusques  a  la  Concurance  de  ce  qui  luy  est  dub  interest  et 
frais  Et  nommement  de  la  somme  de  quartre  cent  soixante  dix 
livres  dix  sols  suivant  le  billet  dud*  Wood  que  le  demandeur  a 
Exhibe  a  la  Cour. 

Le  defifendeur  a  repondu  quil  ne  soposoit  pas  a  la  dite  vente 
et  quil  y  Consentoit  quil  navoit  pas  dautre  moyen  pour  payer. 
Sur  quoy  la  Cour  ordonne  que  les  Choses  saisies  seront  vendues 
Sans  delais  a  la  demande   du    Saisissant   par  Ihuissier    credit 
pour  le  produit  En  provenant  Etre  delivre  aud*  s^  Glamorgan 
jusqua    la    Concurance    de    tout    ce    qui    pent    luy    etre    dub 
soit  par  billets  ou  obligations  interest  Et  frais  condamne  led* 
Wood  aux  frais  Et  depens  tant  de  Saisie  instence  que  autres  a 
intervenir  [  ?]  qui  seront  avances  par  M^  Glamorgan  Et  a  luy  Rem- 
bourcez  sur  les  Biens  dud*  Wood  ce  qui  sera  execute, 
a  la  meme  cour. 
MARC  SCHISOLM  demandeur  Contre  Francois  Clark 
deffendeur 

Led*  Clark  et  led*  schisolom  on  presente  une  sentence  Rendue 
par  le  s'"  Schemitz  juge  a  paix  au  grand  Ruisseau  tendante  au 
payement  dun  alanbic.  La  Cour  assemble  elle  a  homalogue  Et 
homalogue  la  dite  sentence  Rendue  par  led*  s^  Schemitz  le  i8  dav- 
ril  dernier,  ordonne  ladite  Cour  que  ladite  sentence  sortira  son 
plain  Et  Entier  effet  seulement  p^  la  somme  principale  et  pour 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1788  331 

said  Brisson  offered  to  do.     And  now  he  made  his  oath  on  the 
Holy  Gospels. 

Whereupon  the  Court  condemned  M.  Germain  to  receive  and 
take  the  joists,  which  shall  be  accepted  by  arbitrators  as  good  and 
acceptable,  as  of  three  inches  in  thickness  and  nine  feet  in  length, 
and  of  poplar;  and  that  they  shall  be  received  to-morrow  the  2nd 
of  this  month.    We  condemn  Germain  to  pay  the  costs  and  charges. 

At  the  same  Court 
M.  Glamorgan,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Charles  Wood,  American  inhabi- 
tant of  Grand  Ruisseau,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  demands  that  the  house  and  the  wheat  sowed  on 
the  land  of  Jacob  Groot,  belonging  to  the  said  Wood,  and  which 
has  been  attached  on  the  demand  of  the  said  M.  Glamorgan  by 
order  of  the  Court,  be  sold  up  to  the  equivalent  of  what  the  de- 
fendant owes  him  with  interest  and  costs,  that  is  the  sum  of  four 
hundred  and  seventy  livres  ten  sols  according  to  the  note  of  the 
said  Wood  which  the  plaintiff  exhibited  to  the  Court. 

The  plaintiff  replied  that  he  was  not  opposing  the  said  sale  and 
that  he  consented  thereto  and  that  he  did  not  have  other  means 
of  paying.  Whereupon  the  Court  decrees  that  the  goods,  which 
have  been  attached,  shall  be  sold  without  delay  by  the  huissier 
on  the  demand  of  the  execution  creditor;  and  that  credit  from  the 
proceeds  thereof  shall  be  delivered  to  the  said  M.  Glamorgan  up 
to  a  sum  equal  to  that  which  may  be  owing  him  either  by  notes 
or  obligations  with  interest  and  costs.  Condemned  the  said  Wood 
to  pay  the  costs  and  charges  as  well  for  the  writ  of  execution  as  for 
the  other  intervening  writs,  and  the  costs  shall  be  advanced  by  M. 
Clamorgan  and  reimbursed  to  him  from  the  goods  of  the  said 
Wood;  for  which  there  will  be  execution. 
At  the  same  Coiu"t. 

Mark  Chisholm,  Plaintiff,  vs  Francis  Clark,  Defendant. 

The  said  Clark  and  the  said  Chisholm  presented  a  decree 
rendered  by  M.  Smith,  justice  of  the  peace  at  Grand  Ruisseau 
in  regard  to  the  payment  for  a  still.  The  Court,  having  assembled, 
affirmed  and  does  affirm  the  said  decree  rendered  by  the  said 
M.  Smith  the  i8th  of  April  last.     The  said  Court  decrees  that  the 


332  ILLINOIS  •HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

les  frais  fait  pardevant  led*  s^  schemitz  pour  ladite  sentence,  a 
deboutd  Et  deboute  led*  chisholm  du  Compte  de  frais  quil  fait 
monter  a  Soixante  piastres  luy  enjoint  de  recevoir  son  payement 
des  mains  dud*  Clark  ou  des  depositaires  diceluy  Condamnons 
led*  Clark  a  payer  dix  livres  pour  les  frais  de  la  presente  homo- 
logation donn^  en  Cour  lesd*  jour  Et  an.  Et  a  deboute  led* 
Chisholm  de  Son  compte  de  frais  pOur  Etre  Exhorbitant  Et  sans 
setre  mis  en  regie  pour  justifl&er  des  dits  frais  Et  payera  led* 
Clark  les  frais  de  saisie  ce  qui  sera  execute. 
La  Cour  est  ajourn^e  au  i^^  aoust  prochain. 

mth  Saucier  psd. 


a  une  Cour  du  i®^  aoust  1788. 
Mathieu  Saucier  presidant        Charle  ducharme 
B*®  Saucier  fr.  Lapensee 

P^^  Laperche  henry  Biron 

Magistrats 
Entre  Robert  jons  demandeur  Contre  Samuel  Morice 

deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  a  dit  que  avant  hier  il  a  rencontre  ches  le 
Nomme  Thom  Bredy  le  Nomme  samuel  Morice  qui  luy  devoit, 
auquel  il  a  demande  son  payement.  que  ledit  morice  Et  led* 
Jones  Se  Sont  disputez  Ensemble  et  dit  plusieurs  injures  et 
fait  des  menaces  que  led*  morice  avoit  un  Baton  avec  lequel  il 
la  frape  Et  quil  Sest  reveng^  ayant  pris  led*  morice  par  les  che- 
veux,  que  ledit  morice  luy  a  pris  le  pouce  avec  les  dants  dont  il 
se  trouve  extropi^  quil  demande  contre  ledit  morice  le  des  dom- 
agement  de  la  perte  de  Son  temp  ne  pouvant  travailler  de  Son 
metier  de  Chapellier. 

Ledit  morice  a  replique  que  setoit  jones  qui  avoit  commence  la 
dispute  Et  quil  lui  avoit  jete  une  Roche  de  la  grosseur  de  quatre 
a  Cinq  livres,  que  sil  En  avoit  Ete  frap^  il  En  auroit  Etdtue.  la 
dite  roche  ayant  frapd  dans  la  porte  ou  potau  de  la  maison  ou 
Elle  a  Encave  led*  poteau  led*  morice  Se  Sauvant  dans  ladite  mai- 
son que  sest  En  sortant  de  la  maison  quil  se  sont  pris  et  que  led* 


COURT  RECORD,  AUGUST,  1788  333 

said  decree  shall  have  its  full  and  entire  effect  only  for  the  prin- 
cipal sum  and  for  the  costs  made  before  the  said  M.  Smith  for  the 
said  decree.  The  Court  denied  and  does  deny  the  account  of  the 
said  Chisholm's  expenses,  which  he  has  made  run  up  to  sixty  pias- 
tres, and  enjoins  him  from  receiving  his  pay  from  the  hands  of  the 
said  Clark  or  from  his  depositaries.  We  condemn  the  said  Clark 
to  pay  ten  livres  for  the  costs  of  the  present  afhrmance.  Given  in 
Court  the  said  day  and  year.  And  the  Coiurt  denied  the  account 
of  costs  of  the  said  Chisholm  as  being  exorbitant  and  as  not  being 
put  in  due  form  to  justify  said  expenses;  and  the  said  Clark  shall 
pay  the  costs  of  the  seizure,  for  which  there  will  be  execution. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  the  ist  of  August  next. 

Matt.  Saucier,  Pres. 
At  a  Court  August  i,  1788. 

Matthieu  Saucier,  President. 

Bte.  Saucier.  Fr.  Lapanc^. 

Pierre  Laperche.  Henry  Biron. 

Charles  DuCharme.  Magistrates. 

Robert  Jones,  Plaintiff,  vs  Samuel  Morris,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  said  that  day  before  yesterday  he  met  at  the 
house  of  the  named  Thomas  Brady  the  named  Samuel  Morris, 
who  was  owing  him  and  from  whom  he  demanded  his  payment; 
that  the  said  Morris  and  the  said  Jones  quarreled,  used  abusive 
language  and  made  threats;  that  the  said  Morris  had  a  stick  with 
which  he  struck  the  plaintiff  and  that  he  revenged  himself  by 
seizing  the  said  Morris  by  the  hair;  that  the  said  Morris  bit  his 
thumb  with  his  teeth,  from  which  he  was  maimed;  that  he  demands 
from  the  said  Morris  damages  for  the  loss  of  his  time,  since  he 
could  not  work  at  his  trade  of  hatter. 

The  said  Morris  replied  that  it  was  Jones  who  began  the 
quarrel  and  that  he  had  thrown  at  him  a  rock  weighing  four  or 
five  pounds;  that  if  he  had  been  struck  with  it,  he  would  have 
been  killed;  that  the  said  rock  struck  the  door  or  the  post  of 
the  house  and  made  a  deep  dent  in  it  and  that  the  said  Morris 
saved  himself  by  going  into  the  said  house;  that  it  was  when  he 
came  out  of  the  house  that  they  caught  hold  of  each  other  and 


334  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Jones  le  tenant  par  les  Cheveux  et  ne  Voulant  le  lacher  luy  En 
fonceant  Son  pouce  dans  la  Bouche  la  douleur  Lavoit  force  a  le 
mordre  requerant  frais  et  depens  contre  led*  jones. 

parties  ouies  le  tout  examine  la  Cour  a  renvoy^  Les  dites  par- 
ties hor  de  cour  et  de  proces  p^  ladite  afifaire  les  condamne  chacun 
aux  frais  Et  depens. 

La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  i^^  7^^®  1788. 

Mth.  Saucier 

a  une  Cour  tenue  Extraordinairement  le  8  aoust  1788. 
M^^  Matieu  Saucier  presidant  fr.  Lapensee 

B*^  Saucier  henry  Biron 

Ladite  cour  a  fait  paroitre  devant  Elle  Le  Nomme  jean  B*^ 
Colin  demeurant  Ches  la  dame  Brisson  soupconne  davoir  parti- 
sipe  a  lEnlevement  des  effets  du  Nomme  Brisson  Et  sa  femme, 
led*  Colin  detenu  aux  fer.  lequel  Etant  En  la  presence  de  la 
Cour  Et  apres  sermant  par  luy  fait  Sur  les  Saints  Evangiles  luy 
avons  demande  sil  a  Connoissance  de  Lenlevement  ou  recele- 
ment  des  Effets  dud*  brisson  et  sa  femme  et  sil  ny  a  pas  parti- 
cipe  a  repondu  quil  N'en  a  aucunne  Connoissance  Et  quil  na 
Enleve  ny  aide  a  Enlever  aucuns  Bestiaux  ny  effets,  quil  ignore 
ceux  qui  En  ont  detourne  quil  declare  Seulement  que  madame 
Brisson  luy  a  fait  porter  une  scie  de  Long  dans  le  jardin,  laquelle 
scie  nous  avons  demande  ou  Elle  Etoit  le  jour  de  hier  a  linvan- 
taire  personne  ne  la  representant  Nous  lavons  Envoyee  Cher- 
cher  dans  le  jardin  nous  Etant  apercii  quelle  y  Etoit  Cachee  liee 
avec  une  pelle  a  four  pour  etre  Emport^e;  lequel  nous  declare 
presentement  que  cest  madame  Brison  qui  luy  a  fait  porter  dans 
le  jardin;  Et  na  voulu  avouer  aucunne  autre  Chose  sur  toutes 
les  demandes  que  nous  luy  avons  faites. 

lui  avons  demande  quelle  jour  ou  luy  a  dit  de  porter  la  sie 
dans  le  jardin. 

a  dit  que  cest  avant  hier 

luy  avons  demande  sil  sait  autres  Chose. 

a  dit  que  Non. 

^  In  the  morning  of  July  lo,  1788,  Alexis  Brisson  made  a  brutal  attack  on  Thereze,  the 
widow  of  John  Henson,  former  trader  of  Cahokia.  The  immediate  occasion  of  it  was  her 
gossip  about  Brisson's  wife.  Brisson  kicked  the  woman,  hit  her  with  a  chair  and  then  dragged 
her  to  the  wood-pile,  where  he  was  preparing  to  kill  her,  when  he  was  prevented  by  J.  Bte. 


COURT  RECORD,  AUGUST,  1788  335 

that  Jones  held  him  by  the  hair  and  would  not  release  him  and 
sunk  his  thumb  in  his  mouth  and  the  pain  forced  him  to  bite  it; 
and  he  demands  costs  and  charges  from  the  said  Jones. 

Having  heard  the  parties  and  examined  all,  the  Court  dismissed 
the  said  parties  from  court  and  suit  in  regard  to  the  said  affair; 
and  condemned  each  to  pay  the  costs  and  charges. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  September  i,  1788. 

Matt.  Saucier. 

At  a  Court  meeting  in  special  session,  August  8,  1788. 
MM.  Matthieu  Saucier,  President.     Fr.  Lapanc^. 
Bte.  Saucier.  Henry  Biron. 

The  said  Court  summoned  before  it  the  named  Jean  Bte.  Colin, 
who  dwells  at  the  house  of  Madame  Brisson,  and  who  is  suspected 
of  having  participated  in  the  removal  of  the  effects  of  the  named 
Brisson  and  his  wife.^  The  said  Colin  was  held  in  irons.  When 
he  was  in  the  presence  of  the  Court  and  had  made  oath  on  the  Holy 
Gospels,  we  asked  him  if  he  had  knowledge  of  the  removal  or  con- 
cealment of  the  effects  of  the  said  Brisson  and  his  wife,  and  if  he 
had  not  participated  therein.  He  answered  that  he  had  no  knowl- 
edge thereof  and  that  he  had  not  removed  nor  aided  in  the  removal 
of  any  animals  or  effects;  that  he  did  not  know  who  had  taken 
them  away;  he  declared  only  that  Madame  Brisson  made  him 
carry  a  whip-saw  into  the  garden.  Yesterday  at  the  inventory  we 
asked  where  this  saw  was  and  when  nobody  showed  it  to  us,  we 
sent  to  seek  it  in  the  garden,  having  noticed  that  it  was  hidden 
there  bound  up  with  a  baker's  shovel  ready  to  be  carried  away. 
The  witness  now  declared  to  us  that  it  was  Madame  Brisson  who 
made  him  carry  it  into  the  garden;  and  he  did  not  wish  to  confess 
anything  else  to  all  the  questions  which  we  put  to  him. 

We  asked  him  what  day  they  had  told  him  to  carry  the  saw 
into  the  garden. 

He  said  it  was  day  before  yesterday. 

We  asked  if  he  knew  anything  else. 

He  said, ''No." 

LaCroix.  Madame  Brisson  was  present  during  the  assault  and  urged  her  husband  on.  On 
July  31,  the  state's  attorney,  Labuxiere,  charged  Brisson  with  assassination,  and  the  Court 
ordered  Commandant  Trottier  to  arrest  Brisson,  and  in  case  of  resistance  toslioothim. — Chi. 
Hist.  Soc.  Cah.,  Rec. 


336  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

lecture  a  luy  faite  de  Sa  deposition  a  dit  Contenir  verite  y  per- 
siste  et  a  signd  avec  nous.  Et  avant  de  Signer  a  declare  Et  af- 
firm^ que  francois  Canadien  avoit  Emmene  les  Chevaux  de  Bris- 
son  et  sa  femme  depuis  la  prairie  du  pont  jusques  au  mississipy 
Les  quels  Chevaux  avoit  Et^  conduit  de  la  maison  de  la  dame 
Brisson  par  ses  Enfans  jusqua  la  p^^®  du  pont  et  remis  aud^  fr. 
canadien  qui  les  men^  au  mississipy  p^  traverser  mardy  dernier 
declare  de  plus  quil  a  fait  une  Cache  par  ordre  de  la  dame  Bris- 
son dans  la  grange  La  quelle  il  offre  de  montrer  dans  la  terre  qui 
est  tout  ce  quil  a  dit  savoir  sous  Son  Sermant  et  a  Signd  Et  promis 
que  sil  survient  quelque  Chose  a  sa  Connoissance  de  la  declarer. 
[Signed] 

Jan  baptis  colin  marque 

francois  Lapance  hBi 

B  Saucier  d  henry  Biron 

Labuxiere  grefier  Mth.  Saucier 


a  une  cour  du  9  aoust  1788. 
tenue  par  les  memes  magistrats. 

avons  fait  paroitre  francois  Renoux  accuse  davoir  aid6  a 
Enlever  les  Chevaux  de  Brisson  Et  sa  femme  lequel  aprds 
sermant  par  luy  fait  de  dire  verity  luy  avons  demand^  Sil  a 
aidd  ou  participe  a  LEnlevement  des  Chevaux  de  Brisson  Et  sa 
femme. 

a  dit  avoir  atrap^  deux  juments  Et  trois  poulins  par  ordre  de 
la  femme  de  Brisson  et  quil  les  a  conduits  au  mississipy  ou  la 
dame  Brisson  luy  avoit  dit  de  les  mener  et  de  les  atacher  avec 
deiix  autres  chevaux  que  les  Enfans  de  ladite  femme  ont  mend 
avec  luy. 

interoge  sil  ne  savoit  pas  que  ces  chevaux  Etoient  Sai- 
sis  et  la  publication  faite  a  la  porte  de  lEglise  dimanche 
dernier. 

a  repondii  quil  ne  I'avoit  pas  sue. 

interoge  sil  ne  savoit  pas  que  le  Nommd  Brisson  Etoit  fugitif 
et  poursuivis. 


COURT  RECORD,  AUGUST,  1788  337 

The  reading  of  his  deposition  was  made  to  him  and  he  said  that 
it  contained  the  truth  and  persisted  therein  and  signed  with  us. 
And  before  signing  he  declared  and  affirmed  that  Francois  Cana- 
dien  had  driven  the  horses  belonging  to  Brisson  and  his  wife  from 
Prairie  du  Pont  to  the  Mississippi,  and  that  these  horses  were  led 
from  the  house  of  Madame  Brisson  as  far  as  Prairie  du  Pont 
by  her  children  and  delivered  to  the  said  Fr.  Canadien,  who 
led  them  to  the  Mississippi  in  order  to  cross  last  Wednesday. 
He  declared  further  that  he  made  by  order  of  Madame  Brisson 
a  cache  in  the  barn,  which  he  offered  to  show.  This  is  all 
which  he  said  under  oath  that  he  knew  and  he  has  signed;  and 
he  promised,  if  anything  came  to  his  knowledge,  to  make  it 
known. 
.  [Signed] 

Jean  Baptiste  Colin.  Mark  of 

Francois  Lapancd.  h  B  i 

.    B.  Saucier.  Henry  Biron 

Labuxiere,  Clerk. 

At  a  Court,  August  9,  1788,  held  by  the  same  magistrates. 

We  have  summoned  Francois  Renoux  accused  of  having  aided 
in  the  removal  of  the  horses  belonging  to  Brisson  and  his  wife;  and 
after  he  had  taken  oath  to  tell  the  truth,  we  asked  him  if  he  aided, 
or  participated  in,  the  removal  of  the  horses  belonging  to  Brisson 
and  his  wife. 

He  said  that  he  caught  two  mares  and  three  colts  by  order  of 
Brisson' s  wife,  and  that  he  took  them  to  the  Mississippi,  where 
Madame  Brisson  had  told  him  to  lead  them  and  to  tie  them  with 
two  other  horses,  which  the  children  of  the  said  woman  had  lead 
with  him. 

Asked  if  he  did  not  know  that  these  horses  were  attached  and 
that  publication  had  been  made  at  the  door  of  the  church  last 
Sunday. 

Answered  that  he  did  not  know  it. 

Asked  if  he  did  not  know  that  the  named  Brisson  was  a  fugitive 
and  was  pursued. 

Answered  that  he  knew  that  they  were  pursuing  him;  but  that 


338  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  repondti  quil  savoit  que  Ion  le  poursuivoit  mais  quil 
lavoit  vlj  paroitre  Et  disparoitre  plusieurs  fois  et  quil  Croyoit 
que  Ion  ne  Le  recherchoit  plus,  quil  ne  Croyoit  pas  faire  mal 
en  menant  les  Chevaux  quil  Lavoit  fait  sans  reflection.  Et 
quil  sest  mefie  au  mississipy  que  setoit  p^  les  traverser  sur  lautre 
Rive. 

interoge  sil  a  quelque  Chose  a  declarer  de  plus.  Et  sil  na 
pas  Connoissance  de  quelques  Enlevement  fait  par  quelqu'un  des 
Effets  ou  bestiaux  de  Brisson  Et  sa  femme. 

a  repondu  quil  n'en  a  aucunne  Connoissance. 

Lecture  a  luy  faite  de  Sa  declaration  a  dit  quelle  contient 
verite  quil  y  persiste  sous  le  Sermant  quil  a  fait  Et  a  dit  ne  savoir 
signer  Et  a  fait  Sa  marque  ord^®  Et  avons  Signe  les  dits  jours 
Et  an. 
[Signed] 

francois  Lapance  marque  de 

B  Saucier  -|- 

B  Dubuque  fr.  Renoux 

deposant 

Labuxiere  Mth.  Saucier  psd. 

Du  dix  huit  aout  mil  Sept  Cent  quatre  vingt  huit. 

Messieurs  Jean  B^^  Dubuque  Philipe  Engel  et  Louis  Chatel 
ont  fait'le  serment  d'office  En  qualite  de  Magistrats  pour  la 
nouvelle  Nomination  En  la  Place  des  sieurs  Mathieu  Saucier  B*^ 
saucier  et  fr.  la  pensee  qui  se  sont  demis  de  leur  Charge  les 
dits  Magistrats  ayant  Ete  nommes  par  la  n^^^®  Election.  Sont 
Comparus  et  apres  avoir  prete  serment  de  fidelite,  ainsi 
que  celui  d'ofiice  ont  pris  leur  Place  et  leurs  qualites  de  Magis- 
trats. 

Je  sousigne  Pierre  Billet  avoit  fait  serment  que  Je  me  Com- 
porterai  Bien  Et  vraiment  dans  la  Charge  de  Greffier  qui  m'a 
Ete  admise  Ce  Jour,  selon  ma  Connoiss^  et  Jugement.  aux  Cahos 
le  17  aout  1788. 

P  Billet  Greffier 


COURT  RECORD,  AUGUST,  1788  339 

he  had  seen  him  appear  and  disappear  several  times  and  that  he 
believed  that  they  were  no  longer  searching  for  him;  that  he  did 
not  believe  that  he  was  doing  wrong  in  leading  the  horses;  that  he 
had  done  it  without  reflection;  that  he  suspected  at  the  Mississippi 
that  the  purpose  was  to  send  them  across  to  the  other  bank. 

Asked  if  he  had  anything  else  to  declare,  and  if  he  did  not  have 
knowledge  of  the  removal  of  the  effects  or  cattle  belonging  to  Bris- 
son  and  his  wife  by  some  one. 

Answered  that  he  had  no  knowledge  thereof. 
Reading  was  made  of  his  deposition  and  he  said  that  it  can- 
tained  the  truth  and  he  persisted  therein  under  the  oath  which  he 
made;  and  he  said  that  he  did  not  know  how  to  sign  and  made  his 
mark,  and  we  have  signed  the  said  day  and  year. 
[Signed] 

Francois  Lapanc^.  mark  of 

B  Saucier.  + 

B.  Dubuque.  Fr.  Renoux,  deponent. 

Labuxiere.  Mth.  Saucier,  Pres. 


August  18,  1788. 

MM.  Jean  Bte.  Dubuque,  Philippe  Engel  and  Louis  Chatel  have 
taken  the  oath  of  office  as  magistrates  by  the  new  election  in 
place  of  MM.  Matthieu  Saucier,  Bte.  Saucier  and  Fr.  Lapanc^  who 
have  resigned  from  their  office.  The  said  magistrates,  having 
been  named  by  the  new  election,  appeared  and,  after  having  taken 
oath  of  fidelity  as  well  as  that  of  office,  have  taken  their  place  as 
magistrates. 

I  the  undersigned  Pierre  Billet  have  taken  oath  that  I  will  con- 
duct myself  well  and  faithfully  in  the  office  of  clerk,  to  which  I 
have  been  appointed  this  day,  according  to  my  knowledge  and 
judgment.     At  Cahokia  August  17,  1788. 

*  P.  Billet.  Clerk.^ 

^  Why  Billet  was  appointed  clerk  in  place  of  Labuxiere  is  not  known,  but  he  did  not 
serve  long.  On  December  i,  Labuxiere  signed  as  deputy  clerk  and  on  Febniary  2,  1789,  as 
clerk,  and  from  that  date  the  handwriting  proves  that  he  served  regularly. 


340  ILLINOIS  fflSTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  line  meme  Cour. 
Presidant  ant  girardin 

Louis  Chatel  Ch.  Ducharme 

Philipe  Engel  Henri  Beron 

P.  la  Perche  B*^  Dubuque 

Magistrals 
a  la  meme  Cour  avons  appointe  une  Requete  En  faveur  de 
M^  Cerre  et  lui  avons  permis  la  saisie  des  Biens  du  Sr.  James 
Moor  Jusqua  que  la  Cour  En  ordonnera. 
La  Cour  Est  adjourn^  au  i^'^  Septembre. 

A*  Girardin  psd. 

a  une  Cour  tenue  le  i^^  7^^^  1788. 
Messieurs  Ch  ducharme  President       henri  Biron 
B^^  dubuque  Pierre  La  Perche 

Philipe  Engel  Louis  Chatel 

Magistrats 
P  Billet  demandeur  Contre  le  Sieur  Smith  deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  a  declare  que  le  Sieur  Smith  Lui  devoit  un 
cochon.  d'Environ  Cents  livres  et  que  le  terns  etant  passe  pour 
le  Payement  et  lui  en  aiant  Plusieurs  demandes  il  lui  avoit 
toujours  refuse  Sous  mauvais  pretexte  le  deffendeur  dit  quil  lui 
avoit  offert  plusieurs  fois  mais  quil  I'avoit  refuse  disant  quil 
n'etoit  pas  gros  et  quil  avoit  un  temoin  du  march^  Entre  Eux 
que  nous  avons  fait  Paroitre  et  a  dit  quil  lui  devoit  le  Cochon  et 
devoit  lui  Enmener  tel  quil  Etoit  La  Cour  a  ordonne  aud^ 
Smith  de  Livrer  le  Cochon  aud^  P  Billet  sous  quinze  Jours, 
et  Condamnons  le  dit  Smith  aux  frais. 

DuCharme  prsd. 
a  une  meme  Cour. 
Les  SiEURS  Morel  et   Sans  Facon  demandeur  Contre   Sieur 
Mathieu  Saucier  deffendeur 
Les  demendeurs  nous  aiant  Expos^  leurs  plaintes  par  une 
requete  du  dix  Sept  aout  dernier  par  Lequel  ils  avoient  Et6 
recuses  par  le  S^  Mathieu  saucier  pour  servir  de  Jures  nous  avons 
ordonn^  au  S^  Mathieu  Saucier  de  Paroitre  aujourdhui  devant 
nous  et  y  Exposer  Ses  raisons  des  Insultes  par  lui  fait  aux  dits 


COURT  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1788  341 

At  the  same  Court. 
President  Ant.  Girardin  Ch.  DuCharme. 

Louis  Chatel.  Henri  Biron. 

Philippe  Engel.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

P.  Laperche.  Magistrates 

At  the  same  court  we  referred  a  petition  in  favour  of  M.  Cerr^ 
and  allowed  him  the  seizure  of  the  goods  of  M.  James  Moore, 
until  the  Court  shall  give  orders  concerning  it. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  September  i. 

Ant.  Girardin,  Pres. 

At  a  Covirt,  September  i,  1788. 
MM.  Ch.  DuCharme,  President.    Henry  Biron. 
Bte.  Dubuque.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Philippe  Engel.  Louis  Chatel. 

Magistrates. 
P.  Billet,  Plaintiff,  vs.  M.  Smith,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  declared  that  M.  Smith  owed  him  a  pig  of  about 
one  hundred  pound  weight  and  that  when  the  time  was  passed  for 
the  payment  and  he  had  made  several  demands  for  it,  the  defendant 
had  always  refused  with  poor  excuses.  The  defendant  says  that 
he  had  offered  it  several  times  to  the  plaintiff,  but  that  he  had  re- 
fused it  saying  that  it  was  not  fat;  and  he  says  that  he  had  a  wit- 
ness of  the  agreement  between  them,  whom  we  have  summoned,  and 
who  said  that  he  owed  the  pig  and  ought  to  return  one  like  it.  The 
Court  ordered  the  said  Smith  to  deliver  the  pig  to  the  said  P.  Billet 
within  a  fortnight.  And  we  condemn  the  said  Smith  to  pay  the  costs. 

DuCharme,  Pres. 
At  the  same  Court. 
MM.  Morel  and  SANSFA90N,  Plaintiffs  vs.  M.  Matthieu, 

Saucier  Defendant. 
The  plaintiffs  set  forth  their  complaints  by  a  petition  of  the  1 7th 
of  August  last  according  to  which  they  had  been  challenged  by  M. 
Matthieu  Saucier  for  jury  services  and  we  ordered  M.  Matthieu 
Saucier  to  appear  to-day  before  us  to  show  his  reasons  for  the  insults 
made  by  him  to  the  said  MM.  Morel  and  Sansfajon.    Whereat 


342  ILLINOfS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Sieurs  morel  et  Sans  fa^on  a  quoi  il  a  reconnu  ses  torts,  et  a  dit 
quil  ne  I'avoit  fait  que  par  megard.  et  leur  en  a  fait  Ses  Excuses 
en  presence  de  nous  aux  Cahos  le  i^^  7^^^  1788. 

P  Billet  Greffier  DuCharme  pr 

a  une  meme  Cour. 
Le  SiEUR  William  Biggs  demandeur  contre  Samuel  Morries 
deffendeur 
le  demandeur  a  dit  que  le  Sieur  Samuel  Morries  ayant  demand^ 
une  Cour  de  Jures  pour  la  deffence  de  laccusation  faite  Contre 
lui  des  Insultes  faite  sur  la  Cour  des  Jures  et  que  n'ayant  point 
paru.  Sur  quoi  le  demandeur  s'est  presente  a  nous  a  quoi  nous 
avons  renvoye  les  Parties,  et  quils  se  choiseront  deux  hommes 
Chacun  a  leur  Choix  pour  Juger  de  Leur  affaire  devant  Mr 
Smith  Juge  a  paix  et  Magistrat  du  Grand  ruisseau  et  Sen  tenu 
a  Ce  que  les  dits  Jures  en  Jugeront  Sans  aucun  rappel  donne 
aux  Cahos  la  Cour  Presente  le  i^^  Sept.  1788. 

DuCharme  psd. 
a  une  meme  Cour. 
S'est  Present^    Le  Sieur  James  Watt  demandeur  Contre  Le 
Sieur  Jacob  Groots  deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  nous  a  presente  deux  Billets  Consenti  a  sa 
faveur  par  ledit  groots  montant  a  La  somme  de  trois  Cents  quatre 
vingt  quatre  livres  payable  en  Lard  et  farine  au  prix  Courant. 
et  nous  a  dit  En  avoir  fait  La  demande  dont  il  Ete  presse  vu  son 
depart,     a  quoi  nous  avons  Condamne  ledit  groots  a  paier  sous 
trois  Semaines  et  les  frais  Ci  Joint  au  Cahos  le  i^^  7^^^  1788. 
P  Billet  greffier  DuCharme  presd. 

La  Cour  Est  ajourne  au  i^^  8^^®  1788. 

DuCharme  psd. 
a  une  Cour  du  premier  octobre  1788. 
Messieurs  Ch.  Ducharme  President     Philipe  Engel. 
B*^  Dubuque  Henri  Biron 

P.  La  Perche  Magistrats 

M.  FR.  Saucier  demandeur  contre  Michel  Chartier  Deffendeur 
Le  Sieur  saucier  presente  un  compte  a  lui  remis  par  M^  Levi 
et  approuve  par  devenant  devant  [sic]  M  La  Croix  dont  il  lui 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1788  343 

he  acknowledged  his  wrong  and  said  that  he  did  it  only  through 

mistake  and  he  made  his  apologies  therefor  to  them  in  our  presence. 

At  Cahokia,  September  i,  1788. 

P.  Billet,  Clerk.  DuCharme,  Pres. 

At  the  same  Court. 

M.  William  Biggs,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Samuel  Morris,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  said  that  M.  Samuel  Morris  had  demanded  a  jury 
trial  to  hear  his  defence  to  the  accusation  against  him  of  having 
insulted  the  jury  court  and  had  not  appeared;  whereupon  the 
plaintiff  presented  himself  to  us.  Whereat  we  dismissed  the  par- 
ties and  ordered  them  each  to  choose  a  man,  to  judge  their  affair 
before  Mr.  Smith,  justice  of  the  peace  and  magistrate  of  Grand 
Ruisseau,  and  they  shall  be  bound  to  this  that  the  said  jurors  shall 
judge  the  cause  without  any  appeal.  Given  at  Cahokia  in  the 
present  Court,  September  i,  1788. 

DuCharme,  Pres. 
At  the  same  Court. 
There  presented  himself  M.  James  Watts,  Plaintiff,  vs.  M.  Jacob 
Groot,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  presented  to  us  two  notes  drawn  in  his  favour  by 
the  said  Groots,  amounting  to  the  sum   of  three  hundred  and 
eighty-four /iz;/'^^  payable  in  lard  and  flour  at  the  current  price; 
and  he  told  us  that  he  had  made  demand  therefor  and  that  he  was 
in  need  of  it  on  account  of  his  departure.     Whereat  we  condemn 
the  said  Groot  to  pay  within  three  weeks  with  the  costs  here 
joined.     At  Cahokia,  September  i,  1788. 

P.  Billet,  Clerk.  DuCharme,  Pres. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  October  i,  1788. 

DuCharme,  Pres. 
At  a  Court,  October  i,  1788. 
MM.  Ch.  DuCharme,  President.     Philippe  Engel 
Bte.  Dubuque.  Henry  Biron. 

P.  Laperche.  Magistrates. 

M.  Fr.  Saucier,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Michel  Chartier,  Defendant. 
M.  Saucier  presents  an  account,  which  had  been  given  to  him 
by  M.  Levy  and  approved  before  M.  LaCroix,  on  which  there  is 


344  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Est  du  par  la  Balance  deux  Cents  Soixante  douze  livres  et  apres 
lui  En  avoir  fait  la  demande  il  lui  a  refusd  disant  que  Son  Compte 
nest  pas  Juste  et  quil  lui  doit  que  Soixante  douze  livres  et  apres 
avoir  verifie  le  Compte  que  nous  Croions  Etre  Juste  et  voyant 
les  Mauvaises  raisons  que  le  S^  Saucier  nous  a  dit  quil  lui  avoit 
alleguds  Nous  ordonnons  au  sieur  Chartier  a  payer  le  Demandeur 
ou  a  lui  trouver  un  Caution  qui  Se  rendra  responsable  de  lad*® 
somme  et  Condamnons  le  sieur  saucier  a  paier  les  frais  et  se 
faire  rembourser  par  le  dit  Chartier. 

DuCharme  psd. 
a  une  mene  Cour. 
Michel  Picket  demandeur  Contre  Louis  Gaud  deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  a  dit  que  le  Nomm^  Louis  gaud  avoit  pris  et 
Engag^  le  petit  la  pierre  et  lui  avoit  promis  une  Pouliche  ou  une 
taure  pour  ses  salaires  et  quil  refusoit  de  lui  donner  le  deffendeur 
a  dit  quil  Pavoit  gard^  Malade  et  que  ses  salaires  netoient  pas 
Capable  de  Paier  sa  Maladie  et  les  soins  quils  avoient  Eu  pour 
lui  Nous  avons  renvoyer  les  parties  par  arbitres. 

DuCharme  psd. 
a  une  Meme  Cour. 
HuGUES  ScHiSHOLM  demandeur  Benjamin  Bayronn  deffendeur 
le  demandeur  nous  a  dit  quil  lui  Ete  diie  Cent  minots  de  Bled 
par  le  dit  Bayronn  pour  deux  vaches  a  Lait  quil  lui  avoit  vendue 
le  deffendeur  a  dit  quil  lui  en  avoit  livre  vingt  Minots  Chez 
thibaud  a  la  Prairie  du  Rocher.  le  demandeur  lui  a  dit  quil 
etoit  gat^  et  quil  netoit  pas  Marchand.  Nous  avons  renvoy^es 
les  Parties  a  faire  visiter  le  Bled,  et  nous  fiant  Sur  le  rapport  quil 
nous  en  sera  fait  Signe  par  M.  Barbeau  et  Condamnons  le  dit 
Bayronn  a  Paier  lexcedent  qui  Est  de  quatre  Vingt  minots  Sous 
huit  Jours,  et  Condamnons  led*  Bayronn  aux  fraix. 

DuCharme  psd. 
adjourn^  La  Cour  au  i^^  Novembre  1788. 
P  Billet  Greffier  DuCharme  prsd. 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1788  345 

due  him  a  balance  of  two  hundred  and  seventy-two  livres;  and 
after  having  made  demand  therefor,  the  defendant  refused  him 
saying  that  his  account  is  not  just  and  that  he  owes  only 
seventy-two  livres;  and  after  verifying  the  account,  which  we  be- 
lieve to  be  just  and  hearing  the  poor  arguments  which  M.  Saucier 
told  us  that  the  defendant  had  pleaded  to  him,  we  order  M. 
Chartier  to  pay  the  plaintiff  or  to  find  a  bondsman  who  will 
render  himself  responsible  for  the  said  sum;  and  we  condemn 
M.  Saucier  to  pay  the  costs  and  to  have  himself  reimbursed  by  the 
said  Chartier.  DuCharme,  Pres. 

At  the  same  Court. 

Michel  Picket,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Louis  Gaud,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  said  that  the  named  Louis  Gaud  had  taken  and 
engaged  the  little  Lapierre  and  had  promised  him  a  filly  or  a 
heifer  for  wages  and  that  he  refused  to  give  it  to  him.  The  de- 
fendant said  that  he  had  tended  him  when  sick  and  that  his 
wages  were  not  sufficient  to  pay  for  his  sickness  and  the  attend- 
ance which  they  had  had  for  him.  We  have  dismissed  the  parties 
to  have  the  case  decided  by  arbitrators. 

DuCharme,  Pres. 
At  the  same  Court.  • 
Hugh  Chisholm,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Benjamin  Byram, 
Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  told  us  that  there  was  due  him  one  hundred  minots 
of  wheat  for  two  milch  cows,  which  he  had  sold  the  defendant. 
The  defendant  said  that  he  had  delivered  twenty  minots  of  it  to 
him  at  the  house  of  Thibault  at  Prairie  du  Rocher.  The  plaint- 
iff said  to  him  that  it  was  spoiled  and  it  was  not  salable. 

We  dismissed  the  parties  to  have  the  wheat  inspected;  and 
having  confidence  in  the  report,  which  will  be  made  us,  signed 
by  M.  Barbau,  we  condemn  the  said  Byram  to  pay  the  excess 
there  is  above  eighty  minots  within  a  week;  and  we  condemn  the 
said  Byram  to  pay  the  costs. 

DuCharme,  Pres. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  November  i,  1788. 

P.  Billet,  Clerk.  DuCharme,  Pres. 


346  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  trois  novembre  1788. 
Messieurs 

Antoine  girardin  President        B*^  Dubuque 
Ch  Ducharme  henri  Biron 

Philipe  Engel  Pierre  La  Perche 

Louis  Chatel  Magistrals 

a  une  meme  Cour. 
Ant  armand  demandeur  Pierre  Richard  deffendeur 
le    demandeur   nous   represente    un    Compte    Contre   le    dit 
Richard  de  la  somme  de  quatre  vingt  dix  neuf  livres  En  argent 
quil  dit  lui  Etre  due  depuis  Cinq  ans.    le  dit  Pierre  Richard  lui 
a  dit  quil  Croioit  I'avoir  Paie  par  Ses  travaux  a  quoi  le  demandeur 
na  voulu  acquiesser  disant  quil  n'avoit  Eu  que  Soixante  sept 
livres  et  quil  lui  avoit  porte  En  Compte  et  apres  avoir  fait  faire 
serment  sur  les  sts  Evangiles  de  la  verite  de  son  Compte  nous 
avons  Condamne  le  dit  deffendeur  aux  frais. 
a  une  meme  Cour. 
le  Sieur  W"'  arrundel  Demand  [sic]  le  S""  J"  B^^  Morel 

Deffendeur 
le  Demandeur  nous  a  expose  par  une  requete  que  le  sieur  Morel 
avoit  pris  a  son  inseu  une  Voiture  quil  avoit  a  la  Prairie  du  Chien 
et  quil  I'avoit  pris  Sans  la  Connoissance  de  Celui  qui  en  Ete  le 
depositaire  en  nous  en  aiant  produit  des  Certificats  et  demander  des 
dedomagemonts  par  sa  Requete  et  ceci  etant  or  de  notre  Connais- 
sance  nous  avons  renvoies  les  Parties  par  arbitres. 

a^  girardin 
ajourne  la  Cour  au  premier  decembre  1788. 

a^  Girardin  p.  s.  d. 
A  une  Cour  du  i^'^  Decembre  1788. 
Messieurs 

Girardin  President  P.  La  Perche 

Ch  Ducharme  B*^  Dubuque 

Philipe  Engel  Louis  Chatel 

Henri  Biron  Magistrats 

a  une  meme  Cour  le  Sieur  Gabriel  Cerre  nous  presente  une 
requete  que  nous  avons  appointe  a  sa  demande. 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1788  347 

At  a  Court,  November  3,  1788. 
MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President.      Bte.  Dubuque. 
Ch.  DuCharme.  Henry  Biron. 

Philippe  Engel.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Louis  Chatel.  Magistrates. 

At  the  same  Court. 
Ant.  Harmand,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Richard,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  brings  to  us  an  account  against  the  said  Richard 
for  the  sum  of  ninety-nine  livres  in  money,  which  he  says  was 
due  five  years  ago.     The  said  Pierre  Richard  told  him  that  he 
believed  that  he  had  paid  it  by  his  labor;  to  which  the  plaintiff 
was  not  willing  to  agree,  saying  that  he  had  had  only  sixty-seven 
livres  and  that  he  had  credited  it  to  his  account;  and  after  having 
made  him  take  oath  on  the  Holy  Gospels  of  the  truth  of  his  ac- 
count, we  condemned  the  said  defendant  to  pay  the  costs. 
At  the  same  Court. 
M.  William  Arundel,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jean  Bte.  Morel, 

Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  sets  forth  to  us  by  a  petition  that  M.  Morel  had 
taken  without  his  knowledge  a  boat,  which  the  plaintiff  had  at 
Prairie  du  Chien,^  and  that  he  had  taken  it  without  the  knowledge 
of  the  one  who  was  custodian  of  it;  and  the  plaintiff  brought  to 
us  certificates  thereof  and  demanded  damages  by  his  petition; 
and  since  this  is  out  of  our  jurisdiction,  we  dismissed  the  parties 
to  plead  before  arbitrators.  Ant.  Girardin. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  December  i,  1788. 

Ant.  Girardin,  Pres. 

At  a  Court,  December  i,  1788. 
MM.  Girardin,  President.         P.  Laperche. 
Ch.  DuCharme.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Philippe  Engel.  Louis  Chatel. 

Henry  Biron.  Magistrates. 

At  the  same  Court  M.  Gabriel  Cerre  presented  to  us  a  petition , 
which  we  have  referred  at  his  request. 

^  Prairie  du  Chien,  in  the  present  state  of  Wisconsin,  was  not  included  in  the  district 
of  Cabokia  or  in  the  county  of  Illinois. 


348  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Vu  par  la  Cour  assemble  Ce  Jour  la  Requete  ci  dessus  Emsem- 
ble  le  testament  olographe  de  feii  Gemes  Moor,  laditte  Cour 
ordonne  quil  sera  fait  Bon  et  fidel  Inyentaire  de  tous  les  Biens 
Generalement  quils  quonques  delaisser  par  ledit  deffunt  James 
Moor  Juridiquement  et  avec  les  formalites  requises  a  la  deligence 
des  sieurs  Cerr^  Bond  et  thomas  Biggs.  Executeurs  testamentaire 
p^  Ce  fait  etre  les  dits  trois  executeurs  testamentaires  mis  en  Bonne 
posession  des  dits  Biens  de  lad^^^  sucession  suivant  laditte  Inven- 
taire  faire  les  recherches  des  dits  Biens  tant  meubles  qu'immeubles 
en  faire  rendre  Compte  a  laditte  Veuve  et  par  tous  autres  qui 
pouroient  les  avoir  en  leur  Possession  et  generalement  faire  tout  ce 
qui  Est  du  devoir  de  leurs  Charges  pour  la  Conservations  des 
droits  et  Interets  des  personnes  interessees  en  la  suditte  sucession 
et  autres  quil  appartiendra  afin  que  la  suditte  sucession  ^oient 
mise  et  regie  par  le  terns  present  par  les  Loix  donne  En  Cour  le 
trois  novembre  Mil  Sept  Cent  quatre  vingt  huit  et  Signe  a  la  Copie 
delivre  Ce  Jour,  antoine  Girardin  B^^  dubuque  Ch  Ducharme 
Philipe  Engel.  Pierre  La  Perche  H.  B.  i.  henri  Biron  une  +  pour 
Louis  Chatel  et  Signe. 

LaBuxiere     Comis  Grefier. 

A  une  Cour  du  i^  Decembre  1788. 

A  Girardin  President  P.  La  Perche 

Ch.  Ducharme  Henri  Biron 

Philipe  Engel  Louis  Chatel 

aug*^  Dubuque  Magistrats 

Par  une  Requete  a  nous  presente  ledit  Jour  Par  hiacinthe  Cecire 
et  aiant  Vu  Son  Expose  nous  avons  Permis  et  Permettons  audit 
hiacinthe  Cecire  de  faire  une  assemble  de  ses  Parents  et  amis  pour 
deliberer  sur  son  Emancipation  le  dit  Jour  et  an  que  dessus. 

P  Billet  Grefier. 

a  une  meme  Cour. 

M.  Jean  Dumoulin  demandeur  Philips  Gervais  Deffendeur 

le  Demandeur  nous  a  Produit  une  Compte  dont  la  Balance  est 

de  Soixante  douze  livres  En  argent,  interet  Compris  Jusqu'a 

ce  jour,     le  deffend^  nous  a  dit  que  led^  Dumoulin  avoit  oii  un 

^  A  copy  of  this  will  is  printed  on  page  515  of  this  volume. 


COURT  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1788  349 

Seen  by  the  assembled  Court  this  day  the  above  petition  to- 
gether with  the  holographic  will  of  the  late  James  Moore.  The  said 
Court  decrees  that  there  shall  be  made  good  and  faithful  inven- 
tory of  the  property,  all  and  singular,  left  by  the  said  deceased 
James  Moore  with  legal  and  requisite  formalities,  at  the  suit  of 
MM.  Cerre,  Bond  and  Thomas  Biggs,  testamentary  executors 
of  the  will.  For  this  purpose  the  three  said  executors  are  to  be  put 
in  full  possession  of  the  said  property  of  the  said  estate;  and 
according  to  the  said  inventory  they  are  to  search  out  the  said 
property,  both  personal  and  real;  and  to  cause  the  said  widow 
and  all  others  who  may  have  it  in  their  possession  to  render  ac- 
count; and  generally  to  do  that  which  is  within  the  duties  of  their 
office  for  the  preservation  of  the  rights  and  interests  of  the  per- 
sons interested  in  the  estate  aforesaid  and  of  others  whom  it  will 
concern;  in  order  that  the  estate  aforesaid  may  be  settled  by  the 
time  prescribed  by  law.  Given  in  Court  the  third  of  November 
1788,  and  signed  on  the  copy  delivered  this  day.^  Antoine 
Girardin,  Bte.  Dubuque,  Ch.  DuCharme,  Philippe  Engel,  Pierre 
Laperche,  H.  B.  I.  Henri  Biron,  a+for  Louis  Chatel,  and 
signed  Labuxiere,  Deputy  Clerk. 

At  a  Court,  December  i,  1788. 
A.  Girardin,  President.  P.  Laperche. 

Ch.  DuCharme.  Henry  Biron. 

Philippe  Engel.  Louis  Chatel. 

Auguste  Dubuque.  Magistrates. 

By  a  petition  presented  to  us  this  said  day  by  Hyacinthe  Ce- 
sirre;  and  after  seeing  his  explanation  we  permitted  and  do  permit 
the  said  Hyacinthe  Cesirre  to  hold  an  assembly  of  his  relatives 
and  friends  to  deliberate  on  his  livery.  The  said  day  and  year 
as  above. 

P.  Billet,  Clerk. 

At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Jean  Dumoulin,  Plaintiff,  -z^j.  Philip  Gervais,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  brought  to  us  an  account,  the  balance  of  which 
is  for  seventy-two  livres  in  money  including  interest  up  to  this 
day.    The  defendant  told  us  that  the  said  Dumoulin  had  had 


350  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Cochon  de  lait  de  lui  a  quoi  il  nous  a  dit  qu'il  Pavoit  paie  Comp- 
tant.  Ce  que  le  deffendeur  a  recuse  et  apres  avoir  fait  faire  ser- 
ment  aud*  S^  Dumoulin  et  avons  Condamne  led*  Gervais  a  Paier 
le  demandeur  et  les  frais  du  Present. 
P.  Billet  Greffier 

a  une  meme  Cour. 
une  Requete  a  nous  presente  par  M''  Dumoulin  par  lequel 
il  nous  represente  que  le  s^  Isadore  LaCroix  aie  a  lui  remettre 
lexcedent  quil  doit  doit  [sic]  payer  pour  un  sauvage  app*  a  Mailher 
quil  lui  a  Ete  adjuge  a  quoi  nous  avons  Conclud  led*  Jour  et  an 
que  dessus. 

P  Billet  Greffier. 

A  une  Meme  Cour. 
Pierre  Billet  demandeur  Clark  deffendeur 
le  demandeur  nous  a  produit  un  Billet  par  lequel  il  nous  repre- 
sente quil  lui  est  du  deux  Cents  douze  livres  de  Lard  depuis  le 
mois  de  Juillet  Passe  et  Vu  ses  mauvaises  Raisons  nous  P avons 
Condamne  a  Paier  sous  huit  Jours  sans  autre  delais. 
Ajourne  La  Cour  au  2.  Janvier  1789. 

A*  Girardin  P.  s.  d. 

A  une  Cour  du  2  Janv^  1789. 

Messieurs 

Ant  Girardin  President  Pierre  LaPerche 

Ch  Ducharme  Henri  Biron 

B*^  Dubuque  Philipe  Engel 

Louis  Chatel  Magistrats 

a  une  Cour  du  2  Janvier  1788  [sic]. 
sur  la  representation  de  M^  de  S*  Pierre  Cure  de  cette  Paroisse 
Sur  ce  que  quelques  habitants  domicilies  de  ce  Village  avoient 
refuses  a  donner  le  Pain  Beni  Croiant  que  Ce  n'etoit  pas  une  obli- 
gation et  nous  en  aiant  fait  voir  les  preuves  nous  Enjoignons  audits 
habitants  a  donner  le  Pain  beni  Chacun  leur  tour,  et  aux  Jours 
d'obligation  fautes  de  quoi  il  seront  Condamne  a  paier  dix  livres  a 
lEglise  tel  quil  est  present  par  les  loix  et  Enjoignons  aux  Marguil- 
liers  de  les  Emploier  a  En  faire  faire  un  a  leur  deffaut  telle  est  notre 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1789  351 

a  suckling  pig  from  him,  for  which  the  plaintiff  told  us  that  he 
had  paid  cash,  which  the  defendant  challenged.  And  after  causing 
the  said  Dumoulin  to  take  oath,  we  condemned  the  said  Gervais 
to  pay  the  plaintiff  and  the  costs  of  the  present  suit. 

P.  Billet,  Clerk. 
At  the  same  Court. 
A  pe  ition  presented  to  us  by  M.  Dumoulin  by  which  he  shows 
us  that  M.  Isidore  LaCroix  should  be  held  to  remit  to  him  the 
balance  which  he  ought  to  pay  for  a  savage  belonging  to  Mailher, 
which  had  been  adjudged  to  him,  to  which  we  agree  the  said  day 
and  year  as  above. 

P.  Billet,  Clerk. 
At  the  same  Court. 
Pierre  Billet,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Clark,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  brought  to  us  a  note,  by  which  he  shows  that 
there  is  owing  to  him  two  hundred  and  twelve  pounds  of  lard 
since   the   month  of  last  July.     And  considering  his  poor  pleas 
we  condemned  the  defendant   to   pay  within   a   week   without 
other  delay. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  January  2,  1789. 

Ant.  Girardin,  Pres. 
At  a  Court,  January  2,  1789. 
MM.  Ant.  Girardin,  President.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Ch.  DuCharme.  Henry  Biron. 

Bte.  Dubuque.  Philippe  Engel. 

Louis  Chatel.  Magistrates. 

At  a  Court,  January  2, 1789. 
On  the  representation  of  M.  de  St.  Pierre,  cure  of  this  parish, 
that  several  inhabitants  domiciled  in  this  village  have  refused  to 
give  the  blessed  bread,  believing  that  it  was  not  an  obliga- 
tion; and  after  he  had  shown  us  the  evidence  thereof,  we  com- 
manded the  said  inhabitants  to  give  the  blessed  bread,  each 
in  his  turn  and  on  the  days  of  obligations ;  in  default  of  which  they 
shall  be  condemned  to  pay  ten  livres  to  the  church,  as  is  at  present 
the  law;  and  we  command  the  wardens  to  use  the  money  to  have 
some  bread  made  to  make  up  the  deficiency.     Such  is  our  opinion. 


352  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

oppinion  donn^  aux  Caho  la  Cour  seante  le  dit  Jour  et  an  que 
dessus. 

ajourn^  la  Cour  au  premier  fevrier  1788  [sic] 
P.  Billet  Greffier  A*  Girardin  p.  s.  d 

A  une  Cour  du  8  fevrier  1789. 
Messieurs 

^tne  Girardin  President  Pierre  LaPerche 

Ch  Ducharme  Philipe  Engel 

Henri  Biron  B*®  Dubuque 

Louis  Chatel  Magistrats 

Le  S*"  Labuxiere  charge  de  la  sucession  de  Raphael  gagnez 
le  demandeur  Contre  Joseph  poupart  deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  demande  au  deffendeur  une  somme  de  six  cent 
soi  Xante  dix  duit  livres  dix  huit  sols  Cinq  deniers  tant  en  principal 
quinterest  dont  il  y  a  deja  Eu  sentence  de  Condamnation  par  cette 
Cour. 

Le  deffendeur  a  demand^  delais  p^  payer  dans  le  Courant  de  ce 
mois. 

La  Cour  accord^  aud*  demandeur  [sic]  le  Courant  de  ce  mois 
Et  la  condamnd  a  payer  sans  plus  long  terme  son  billet  et  interest 
montant  a  lad*  somme  cy  dessus  et  aux  frais  Et  depens  montant 
a  huit  piastres  ce  qui  sera  execute,  ordonnons  au  s^  Lachansse 
heritier  dud*  gagnez  de  prendre  des  mains  du  s^  Labuxiere  Le 
billet  dud*  poupart  dont  le  s^  Labuxiere  sera  Bien  decharge.  ce  qui 
sera  execute. 

Labuxiere  A*  Girardin  psd. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
Louis  Bergeron  demandeur  Contre  jean  B*®  durbois  deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  demande  au  deffendeur  trois  cent  livres  de 
farine  p^  avoir  pense  Et  guery  la  fille  du  Nomme  vaudry 

Le  deffendeur  a  repondti  quil  navoit  point  guery  la  petite  fille 
et  quil  avoit  Etd  oblige  de  la  metre  Entre  les  mains  de  la  dame 

1  Madame  Tom  Brady  was  born  in  St.  Joseph  in  1734  and  lived  successively  in  MichilU* 
mackinac,  Chicago,  and  Cahokia.  Before  marrying  Brady  she  had  had  three  husbands,  La- 
flamme,  Sainte  Ange,  and  Lecompte.  She  exercised  great  power  over  the  Indians,^nd  through 
her  personal  influence  at  times  saved  Cahokia  from  attack.  She  was  universally  respected 
at  Cahokia,  where  she  died  at  an  advanced  age. — Reynolds,  Pioneer  History,  136.  Reynolds 
says  that  she  was  a  daughter  of  Laflamme,  but  the  case  on  p.  277  shows  that  she  was  his 
widow. 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1789       353 

Given  at  Cahokia  at  the  session  of  the  Court  the  said  day  and 
year  as  above. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  February  i,  1789. 
P.  Billet,  Clerk.  Ant.  Girardin,  Pres. 

At  a  Court,  February  8,  1789. 
MM.  Ant.  Girardin,  President.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Ch.  DuCharme.  Philippe  Engel. 

Henry  Biron.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Louis  Chatel.  Magistrates. 

M.  Labuxiere  intrusted  with  the  estate  of  Raphael  Gagne, 
Plaintiff,  vs.  Joseph  Poupar,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  demands  of  the  defendant  a  sum  of  six  hundred 
and  seventy-eight  livres  eighteen  sols  five  derniers  as  well  for  the 
principal  as  interest,  for  which  there  has  been  given  judgment 
by  this  Court. 

The  defendant  asked  for  delay  to  pay  during  the  course  of 
this  month. 

The  Court  granted  to  the  plaintiff  [defendant?]  the  course  of 
this  month  and  condemned  him  to  pay  without  a  longer  delay 
his  note  and  interest,  amounting  to  the  sum  aforesaid  with  costs 
and  charges  which  amount  to  eight  piastres,  for  which  there  will 
be  execution.  We  direct  M.  Lachanse,  heir  of  the  said  Gagnd, 
to  take  from  M.  Labuxiere  the  note  of  the  said  Poupar,  of  which 
M.  Labuxiere  shall  be  fully  discharged,  for  which  there  will  be 
execution. 

Labuxiere.  Ant.  Girardin,  Pres. 

At  the  same  Court. 
Louis  Bergeron,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Jean  Bte.  Dubois,  De- 
fendant. 
The  plaintiff  demands  of  the  defendant  three  hundred  pounds 
of  flour  for  having  attended  and  cured  the  daughter  of  the  named 
Vaudry. 

The  defendant  replied  that  the  plaintiff  had  not  cured  the 
little  girl  and  that  he  had  been  obliged  to  put  her  in  the  hands 
of  Madame  Tom,^  who  had  cured  her;  and  that  it  was  not  the 
said  Bergeron,  that  on  the  contrary  he  had  neglected  her. 


354  ILLINOIS.HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

thome  qui  lavoit  guerie  Et  que  ce  netoit  point  led^  Bergeron  quau 
contraire  il  lavoit  negligee. 

Le  tout  considere  la  Cour  a  deboute  ledit  Bergeron  de  Sa 
demande  la  Condamne  aux  frais  et  depens  Et  a  adjuge  les  trois 
Cent  livres  de  farine  a  la  dame  thorn  qui  a  guery  la  petite  fiUe  ce 
qui  sera  execute.  A*  Girardin  p.  s,  d 

a  la  meme  cour. 
donne  une  Saisie  au  s^  Sans  facon  contre  Wiliam  houre  p^  le 
payement  de  vingt  huit  piastres,  la  saisie  adresser  au  s^  Chemitz 
juge  du  grand  Ruisseau. 

A*  Girardin  psd. 
La  Cour  est  ajourne  au  premier  de  mars  prochain  ce  2  fev  1789. 

A^  Girardin  psd. 
du  [blank]  fevrier  delivre  un  ordre  a  la  requisition  de  Joseph 
La  Chanse   contre  le  Nomme  gasien  p^  paroitre  a  la  Cour  du  2 
mars. 

du  27.  fev  un  ordre  dassignation  a  M^  Wiliam  aRundel  contre 
francois  Clark  de  la  belle  fontaine. 

27.  fevrier  —  un  ordre  dassignation  p^  Le  S^  aRundel  Contre 
James  henderson  du  grand  Ruisseau. 

=un  ordre  p^  Joseph  Lachansse  Contre  pierre  martin. 
=un  ordre  pour  Joseph  Lachansse  Contre  Grosle  pere  et  fils. 
=:un  ordre  p^  Lachansse  Contre  janot  Lapensee. 
=  un  ordre  p^  samuel  Morice  Contre  Joseph  Worley. 
=:un  ordre  p^  M^  Dumoulin  Contre  la  femme  Brisson. 
=  un  ordre  p^  M^  De  Clamorgan  Contre  Lefevre  forgeron. 
=  un  ordre  p^  M^  De  Clamorgan  Contre  Paul  Poupart. 
=:un  ordre  p^  M^  De  Clamorgan  Contre  Izaac  Chalfont. 
=un  ordre  p^  M^  De  Clamorgan  Contre  James  piquet  du 
grand  Ruisseau. 

=un  ordre  p^  M^  de  Clamorgan  Contre  David  Waddel. 
=:un  ordre  p^  M^  de  Clamorgan  Contre  francois  Clark. 
=un  ordre  Contre  Bond  et  Biggs  comme  Executeur  testamen- 
taire  de  moore  delivre  a  M'^  Morgan. 

^  From  now  on  the  clerk  used  the  book  to  keep  a  record  of  the  writs  issued.  These  were 
probably  issued  by  the  justice  of  the  week. 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1789       355 

All  considered  the  Court  denied  the  demands  of  the  said 
Bergeron,  condemned  him  to  pay  the  costs  and  charges  and 
adjudged  the  three  hundred  pounds  of  flour  to  Madame  Tom 
who  cured  the  little  girl,  for  which  there  will  be  execution. 

Ant.  Girardin,  Pres. 
At  the  same  Court. 
Granted  a  writ  of  seizure  to  M.  Sansfa^on  against  William 
Houre  for  the  payment  of  twenty-eight  piastres,  the  writ  being 
addressed  to  M.  Smith,  justice  of  Grand  Ruisseau. 

Ant.  Girardin,  Pres. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  the  ist  of  next  March,  this  2nd  of 
February,  1789. 

Ant.  Girardin,  Pres. 
On  the  —  of  February  a  summons  delivered  on  the  requisition 
of  Joseph  Lachanse  against  the  named  Gassien  that  he  appear 
at  the  Court,  March  2.^ 

On  the  27th  of  February,  a  summons  on  complaint  of  M. 
William  Arundel  against  Francis  Clark  of  Bellefontaine. 

27th  of  February,  a  summons  on  complaint  of  M.  Arundel 
against  James  Henderson  of  Grand  Ruisseau. 

a   summons   on   complaint   of   Joseph   Lachanse   against 
Pierre  Martin. 

a   summons   on   complaint   of   Joseph   Lachanse   against 
Grosl^  father  and  son. 

a  summons  on  complaint  of  Lachanse  against  Janot  La- 
panc^. 

a  summons  on  complaint  of  Samuel  Morris  against  Joseph 
Worley. 

a  summons  on  complaint  of  M.   Dumoulin  against  the 
woman  Brisson. 

a  summons    on    complaint    of    M.     Glamorgan    against 
Lefevre,  blacksmith. 

a  summons  on  complaint  of  M.  Glamorgan  against  Paul 
Poupar. 

a  summons  on  complaint  of  M.  Glamorgan  against  Isaac 
Chalfont. 


356  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

+  =:un  ordre  p'*  denis  verneau  Centre  la  femme  Brisson  le 
s'*  biron  a  repondu  de  lo^^  a  Compte  sur  les  frais. 

4-  =un  ordre  p^  mad®  LaCroix  centre  Louis  Grosl^. 
du  2.  mars  delivr^  une  Saisie  a  matieu  saucier  contre  Joseph 
Cecire  p^  saisir  le  bled  Et  farine  quil  a  au  moulin  du  S^  LeBrun 
p^  surety  de  8oo^  de  farine. 


a  une  Cour  du  deux  Mars  mil  Sept  Cent  quatre  vingt  neuf . 
M^^  ant®  girardin  Presidant       Henry  Biron 
Philipe  angel  B^®  Dubuque 

Charles  ducharme  Pierre  Laperche 

Cons®^^  magistrats. 
Denis  veronneaux  demandeur  Contre  La  femme  Brisson 

deffenderesse 
Le  demandeur  demande  le  payement  de  ses  gages  pendant  une 
annee  tant  pour  faire  marcher  le  moulin  que  ce  qui  en  depend 
Echue  au  p^®^  de  juillet  1788.  Et  en  outre  Le  Batage  de  grange 
montant  p^  lannee  a  Six  Cent  Cinquante  livres  Et  que  pour  Le 
Batage  de  Bled  M^  Cere  doit  luy  entenir  compte. 

La  dame  Brisson  convient  des  six  cent  livres  p''  lannee  elle  a 
produit  un  compte  a  la  Charge  dud*  denis  veronneau  mon*  a  la 
somme  du  Cinq  Cent  dix  neul  livres  Cinq  sols,  aprouve  par  led* 
demandeur.  reste  la  s®  de  Cent  trente  livres  Cinq  sols  sur  laquelle 
somme  est  deduit  vingt  sept  livres  p^  perte  de  bled  par  la  faute  dud* 
verronneau  Et  Cinquante  livres  p^  un  vand  a  vaner  quil  a  laisse 
perir  Reste  du  par  la  dame  Brisson  aud*  demandeur  Cinquante 
trois  livres  cinq  sols  que  la  cour  condamne  la  dame  Brisson  a 


t 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1789  357 

a  summons  on  complaint  of  M.  Glamorgan  against 
James  Piggott  of  Grand  Ruisseau. 

a  summons  on  complaint  of  M.  Glamorgan  against 
David  Waddel. 

a  summons  on  complaint  of  M.  Glamorgan  against 
Francis  Clark. 

a  summons  against  Bond  and  Biggs  as  testamentary  ex- 
ecutors of  the  will  of  Moore  delivered  to  M.  Morgan. 

a  summons  on  complaint  of  Denis  Veronneau  against  the 
woman  Brisson.  M.  Biron  has  made  himself  responsible  for 
ten  livres  on  account  for  the  costs. 

a  simimons  on  complaint  of  Madame  LaCroix  against 
Louis  Grosl^ 

On  the  2d  of  March,  a  writ  of  seizure  delivered  to  Matthieu 
Saucier  against  Joseph  Gesirre,  to  attach  the  wheat  and  flour  which 
he  has  at  M.  Lebrun's  mill  for  surety  for  800  lbs.  of  flour. 
At  a  Goifrt,  March  2,  1789. 
MM.  Ant.  Girardin,  President.        Henry  Biron. 
Philippe  Engel.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Charles  DuCharme.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Councilors  and  Magistrates. 
Denis  Veronneau,  Plaintiff,  vs.  the  woman  Brisson, 
Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  demands  the  payment  of  his  wages  for  a  year 
due  the  first  of  July,  1788,  for  running  the  mill  and  doing  what 
is  connected  therewith;   and  furthermore  for  the  barn-thrashing 
amounting  for  the  year  to  six  hundred  and  fifty  livres  and  also 
for  the  wheat  thrashing  for  which  M.  Gerr^  should  be  account- 
able to  him. 

The  woman  Brisson  acknowledged  the  six  hundred  livres  a 
year.  She  exhibited  an  account  against  the  said  Denis  Veron- 
neau amounting  to  the  sum  of  five  hundred  and  nineteen  livres 
five  sols,  which  was  approved  by  the  said  plaintiff.  This  leaves 
the  sum  of  one  hundred  and  thirty  livres  five  sols,  from  which 
sum  is  deducted  twenty-seven  livres  for  the  loss  of  wheat  through 
the  fault  of  the  said  Veronneau  and  fifty  livres  for  a  winnowing 


358  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

• 

payer  au  demandeur  sous  huit  jours  Condamne  denis  aux  frais. 
ce  qui  sera  Execute. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
Mad®  Lacroix  demanderesse  Contre  Louis  Grosle  deffend- 

eur 

La  demanderesse  a  produit  un  billet  Contre  led*  Grosl^  de  la 
somme  de  Cent  Cinquante  trois  livres  douze  sols  que  le  deffend- 
eur  a  Reconnu  et  a  dit  navoir  de  quoy  payer  actuellement  Et 
quil  avoit  donne  un  acompte  de  six  minot  et  deny  de  bled  Et  deux 
poules  montant  a  quarante  neuf  livres  que  ladite  dame  a  aussi 
Reconnu  partant  reste  a  payer  Cent  quatre  livres  douze  sols  que 
la  Cour  condamne  led*  grosle  a  payer  sous  huit  jour  a  peine  de 
Saisie  ce  qui  Sera  execute  Condamne  led*  grosle  a  payer  quinze 
livres  du  frais. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 

M^  DuMOULiN  demandeur  Contre  La  dame  Brisson  deffen- 
deresse. 

Le  demandeur  repette  par  le  Billet  du  s^  Brisson  Et  desjardins 
solidaires  la  somme  de  trois  Cent  quarante  quatre  livres  Et  vingt 
livres  douze  sols  dinterest  En  argent  payable  En  danr^es.  et  un 
Compte  de  Cinquante  huit  livres  dix  neuf  sols  p^  marchandise 
toutes  diminution  faites  sur  led*  compte. 

la  deffenderesse  a  repondu  quelle  navoit  pas  connoissance  de 
Lachat  du  Cheval  mentionne  aud*  billet  Et  quelle  aprouve  led* 
compte  seulement.  sur  quoy  la  Cour  a  decide  que  M^  Dumoulin 
atendra  un  mois  p^  le  retour  dud*  Brisson  lequel  mois  passd  sera 
libre  de  se  pourvoir  Sur  les  Biens  les  plus  aparants  dud*  brisson 
quil  poura  decouvrir  ou  sur  ceux  dud*  desjardins  comme  solidaire. 
Et  quant  au  Compte  la  Cour  condamne  la  dame  brisson  a  le 
payer  au  s'"  dumoulin  sans  delais  condamne  M^  dumoulins  a 
payer  les  frais.  qui  luy  seront  Rembource  a  la  decizion  du 
billet  ce  qui  sera  Execute 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
Charles  Germain  demandeur  Contre  M^  Dumoulin 

Le  demandeur  demande  la  somme  de  Cent  livres  pour  le 
payement  de  la  prise  et  nouriture  des  Chevaux  saisis  Et  vendus  a 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1789  359 

fan,  which  he  allowed  to  be  ruined.  There  remains  due  by  the 
woman  Brisson  to  the  said  plaintiff  fifty-three  livres  five  sols^ 
which  the  Court  condemns  the  woman  Brisson  to  pay  to  the 
plaintiff  within  a  week.  Condemned  Denis  to  pay  the  costs, 
for  which  there  will  be  execution. 

At  the  same  Court. 

Madame  LaCroix,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Louis  Grosle,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  produced  a  note  against  the  said  Grosl6  for  the 
sum  of  one  hundred  and  fifty-three  livres  twelve  sols,  which  the 
defendant  acknowledged;  and  he  said  that  he  did  not  have  means 
to  pay  at  present,  and  that  he  had  paid  an  instalment  of  six 
minots  and  a  half  of  wheat  and  two  fowls  amounting  to  forty- 
nine  livres  J  which  the  said  lady  also  acknowledged;  there- 
fore there  remains  a  balance  to  be  paid  of  one  himdred  and 
four  livres  twelve  sols,  which  the  Court  condemns  the  said 
Grosle  to  pay  within  a  week  on  pain  of  seizure;  for  which 
there  will  be  execution.  The  said  Grosle  is  to  pay  fifteen  livres 
for  costs. 

At  the  same  Court. 
M.  DuMOULiN,  Plaintiff,  vs.  the  woman  Brisson,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  claims  on  the  note  of  MM.  Brisson  and  Desjardins, 
jointly  and  severally  liable,  the  sum  of  three  hundred  and  forty- 
four  livres  and  twenty  livres  twelve  sols  for  interest  in  money, 
payable  in  kind,  and  an  account  for  fifty-eight  livres  nineteen 
sols  for  merchandise,  all  rebates  being  made  on  the  said  ac- 
count. 

The  defendant  answered  that  she  had  no  knowledge  of  the 
purchase  of  the  horse  mentioned  in  the  said  note,  and  that  she 
approved  the  said  account  only.  Whereupon  the  Court  decided 
that  M.  Dumoulin  shall  wait  a  month  for  the  return  of  the  said 
Brisson,  and  when  the  month  is  passed,  he  shall  be  free  to  sue 
on  the  most  tangible  goods  of  the  said  Brisson,  which  he  can  find, 
or  on  those  of  the  said  Desjardins,  who  is  equally  liable.  And 
as  to  the  account  the  Court  condemns  the  woman  Brisson  to 
pay  it  to  M.  Dumoulin  without  delay.  Condemned  M.  Dumoulin 
to  pay  the  costs,  which  shall  be  reimbursed  to  him  at  the  tune  of 


36o  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

la  requisition  de  M*"  dumoulin  p^  Creances  a  luy  dues  par  le 
Nommd  alary  ameriquain.  Le  S^  dumoulin  a  dit  quil  consentoit 
a  payer  suivant  quil  En  sera  ordonnd  par  la  Cour  p'"  son  rembource- 
ment  Enver  led*  alary. 

sur  quoy  la  Cour  condamne  led*  s^  dumoulin  a  payer  les 
Cent  livres  aud*  Germain  dont  il  luy  sera  tenti  Compte  par  led* 
alary  avecs  les  autres  frais  de  vente  et  de  la  presente  sentence  ce 
qui  sera  Execute. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
Le  S^  Chansse  demandeur  Contre  Janot  la  pensee 

Le  demandeur  demande  que  le  deffendeur  luy  paye  la  somme 
de  Cent  dix  huit  livres  En  danr^es  quil  doit  a  lEncan  de  deffunt 
gagnez  Echus  depuis  noel  ou  a  Son  deffau  que  francois  lapens^e  sa 
caution  soit  condamn^  de  payer  led*  janot  lapensee  ayant  dit  quil 
ne  pouvoit  payer  et  nayant  pas  de  quoy  satisfaire  la  Cour  con- 
damne francois  Lapensee  a  payer  sans  delais  la  dite  somme  Entre 
les  mains  dud*  laChansse  sauf  son  recour  sur  son  frere  Et  aux 
frais  et  depens. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
Le  S'"  La  Chansse  demandeur  Contre  pierre  martin  deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  demande  au  deffendeur  somme  de  cent  Cin- 
quante  huit  livres  En  danrees  quil  luy  doit  p^  lEncan  de  deffunt 
Raphael  Gagnez. 

Le  deffendeur  a  dit  N'avoir  Rien  p^  payer  presentement.  et 
quil  demandoit  jusques  a  la  fin  de  ce  mois  p^  payer  ladite  somme 
Etant  sur  le  point  de  vendre  sa  maison  pour  payer. 

sur  quoy  voyant  L'impossibilite  ou  le  deffendeur  se  trouve 
de  payer  actuellement  la  cour  luy  accorde  le  Credy  du  cour  de  ce 
mois  sans  plus  delais  faute  de  quoy  permis  la  vente  de  ces  Biens. 
deffend  la  cour  au  s^  LaChausse  aucunne  poursuite  jusques  aud* 
tems  Et  cependant  condamne  led*  martin  aux  [frais]  de  Lordre 
et  assignation  de  Ihuissier. 

a  la  meme  cour, 

Samuel  Morice  demandeur  Contre  Joseph  Worley  ameri- 
quain nayant  vouhi  paroitre  apres  assignation  a  luy  donne 
p'"  paroitre  a  cette  Cour. 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1789  361 

the  decision  in  regard  to  the  note,  for  which  there  will  be  execu- 
tion. 

At  the  same  Court. 

Charles  Germain,  Plaintiff,  vs.  M.  Dumoulin,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  demands  the  sum  of  one  hundred  livres  as  pay- 
ment for  the  capture  and  keep  of  the  horses  seized  and  sold  at 
the  requisition  of  M.  Dumoulin  for  debts  due  him  by  the  named 
Alary,  an  American.  M.  Dumoulin  said  that  he  agreed  to  pay 
according  as  the  Court  decreed  for  his  reimbursement  by  the  said 
Alary. 

Whereupon  the  Court  condemned  the  said  Dumoulin  to  pay 
the  hundred  livres  to  the  said  Germain,  for  which,  with  the  costs 
of  the  sale  and  of  the  present  judgment,  the  said  Alary  shall  be 
accountable  to  him. 

At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Lachanse,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Janot  Lapanc6,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  demands  that  the  defendant  pay  him  the  sum 
of  one  hundred  and  eighteen  livres  in  kind,  which  he  owes  for 
what  he  bought  at  the  auction  of  the  goods  of  the  deceased 
Gagn^  and  which  has  been  due  since  Christmas;  or  in  case  of 
his  failure  to  pay  that  Francois  Lapance,  his  bondsman,  be  con- 
demned to  pay.  The  said  Janot  Lapance  having  said  that  he 
could  not  pay,  and  since  he  does  not  have  the  means  to  satisfy 
the  claim,  the  Court  condemns  Francois  Lapanc^,  reserving  to 
him  recourse  against  his  brother,  to  pay  without  delay  the  said 
sum  into  the  hands  of  the  said  Lachanse,  and  to  pay  the  costs 
and  charges. 

At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Lachanse,  Plaintiff,  t^^.  Pierre  Martin,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  demands  of  the  defendant  the  sum  of  one  hun- 
dred and  fifty-eight  livres  in  kind,  which  he  owes  him  for  the 
auction  of  the  goods  of  the  deceased  Raphael  Gagn^. 

The  defendant  said  that  he  had  nothing  with  which  to  pay 
at  present;  and  that  he  asked  for  delay  till  the  end  of  this  month 
in  order  to  pay  the  said  sum,  as  he  was  on  the  point  of  selling 
his  house  in  order  to  pay. 


362  ILLINOIS^  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Le  deffendeur  Se  trouvant  redevoir  aud*  samuel  Morice  vingt 
sept  piastres  En  danrdes  suivant  ses  Billets  tant  pour  argent  recA 
p''  led*  Morice  quil  sest  oblige  de  remetre  aud*  demandeur. 

La  cour  condamne  led*  Worley  a  payer  Sans  aucuns  delais 
les  vingt  sept  piastres  En  danrdes  faute  de  quoy  sera  donnd  main 
forte  p^  saisir  Et  vendre  ses  Effets  jusques  a  la  Concurance  de  ce 
quil  doit  Et  Condamne  led*  Worley  En  tous  les  frais  Et  depens 
ce  qui  sera  execute  adresse  la  presente  sentence  au  S^  schemitz 
p'"  la  faire  executer  sans  Retard. 

frais  15^^  delivre  la  copie. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 

M'"  de  Clarmorgan  demandeur  Contre  jimes  Piggot  ameri- 
quain  absent  Nayant  voulu  paroitre  apres  avoir  Et^  assigne 
Et  apell^  a  haute  voix. 

Le  demande  [sic]  a  produit  le  Billet  du  deffendeur  par 
lequel  led*  piquet  se  trouve  a  devoir  Cinquante  un  minot  de 
Mahis  Egrenne  ainsy  que  Cent  piastres  portee  En  sa  dite 
obligation  faute  davoir  aComply  Ses  conventions  Enver  led* 
Clamorgan. 

Led*  s^  demandeur  requiere  que  led*  piquet  soit  condamne  a 
luy  payer  ladite  quantite  de  Mahis  avec  les  Cent  piastres  vti  le 
refus  dud*  piquet  de  paroitre. 

La  Cour  la  Condamne  et  condamne  a  payer  sans  delais  au 
d*  s''  de  Clamorgan  ladite  quantite  de  Cinquante  un  minot  de 
Mahis  ainsy  que  les  Cent  piastres  de  des  domagement  porte  En 
son  obligation  a  deffaud  par  luy  davoir  acomply  Sa  condition, 
et  le  Condamne  En  outre  a  livrer  le  tout  a  S*  Louis  Residance  de 
M^  Morgan  pour  Navoir  pas  fait  sa  livraison  dans  le  tems  quil 
sy  est  obligd  ou  led*  s^  demandeur  pouvoit  la  faire  transporter 
Sans  frais  Et  le  Condamne  En  outre  En  tous  les  frais  Et  depens  ce 
qui  sera  Execute. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
A  M^  nicolas  Smith  Juge  de  paix  du  G^  ruisseau. 

II  vous  est  ordone  De  prendre  les  Depositions  De  toutes  les 
habitants  de  Votre  district  qui  ont  seme  &  recolte  bles  &  mahis, 
De  Doner  Sur  Sermant,  aussi  Juste  quil  est  possible  p^  la  quantite 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1789  363 

Whereupon  the  Court,  seeing  that  the  defendant  finds  it  im- 
possible to  pay  at  present,  granted  him  credit  during  this  month 
without  longer  delay;  in  default  of  which  the  sale  of  his  property 
is  permitted.  The  Court  forbids  M.  Lachanse  to  bring  any 
suit  until  that  time;  and  moreover  condemns  the  said  Martin 
to  pay  the  costs  of  the  hussier^s  order  and  summons. 

At  the  same  Court. 
Samuel   Morris,   Plaintiff,   vs.    Joseph   Worley,   American, 

refusing  to  appear  after  being  summoned  to  appear  at  this 

Court. 

Since  the  defendant  is  found  to  owe  to  the  said  Samuel  Morris 
twenty-seven  piastres  in  kind  according  to  his  note  as  well  as 
for  money  received  for  the  said  Morris,  which  he  pledged  himself 
to  remit  to  the  said  plaintiff,  the  Court  condemns  the  said  Worley 
to  pay  without  any  delay  the  twenty-seven  piastres,  in  default 
of  which  there  shall  be  given  power  to  seize  and  sell  his  effects 
up  to  the  equivalent  of  what  he  owes;  and  the  Court  condemns 
the  said  Worley  in  all  the  costs  and  charges,  for  which  there 
will  be  execution.  The  present  judgment  is  addressed  to  M. 
Smith  in  order  to  have  it  executed  without  delay. 

At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Clamorgan,  Plaintiff,  vs.  James  Piggott,  American,  absent 

having  refused  to  appear  after  having  been  summoned  and 

called  with  a  loud  voice. 

The  plaintiff  produced  the  note  of  the  defendant  according  to 
which  the  said  Piggott  is  found  to  owe  fifty-one  minots  of  shelled 
corn  as  well  as  one  hundred  piastres  entered  in  his  said  obliga- 
tion as  penalty  for  not  having  fulfilled  his  agreements  with  the 
said  Clamorgan. 

The  said  plaintiff  prays  that  the  said  Piggott  be  con- 
demned to  pay  him  the  said  quantity  of  corn  with  the  hundred 
piastres  in  consideration  of  the  refusal  of  the  said  Piggott  to 
appear. 

The  Court  condemned  and  does  condemn  him  to  pay  without 
delay  to  the  said  M.  Clamorgan  the  said  quantity  of  fifty-one 
minots  of  corn  as  well  as  the  hundred  piastres  damages  entered  in 


364  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

quils  auront  ceuilly  pour  payer  la  Vingt  sixieme  partie  a  quiconque 
Sera  authorise  par  notre  Cour  Pour  Recevoir  Laditte  dixme. 

II  sera  accord^  Jusqu'apres  La  recolte  a  Ceux  qui  ne  pouront 
absolument  pas  payer  actuellement,  Bien  entendu  que  cecy  n'est 
que  pour  ceux  qui  restent  en  Dedan  De  la  ligne  tiree  par  M*" 
Girardin  notre  arpenteur. 

Delivrd  un  ordre  a  michel  olf  Et  a  george  Biggs  adress^  au  S^ 
Schemitz  p^  faire  paroitre  Joseph  Worley  p^  repondre  a  leurs  de- 
mandes  Et  obtenir  le  payement  de  ce  quil  leur  doit  Et  faire  droit 
a  qui  il  appartiendra  led*  jour  Et  an. 

Delivrd  un  ordre  au  S'"  Chemitz  p'"  faire  payer  Joseph  Worley 
vingt  livres  quil  doit  au  S^  Labuxiere. 

Delivr^  un  ordre  verbal  par  la  cour  pour  obliger  le  s^  Chemitz 
sur  sa  parole  a  livrer  au  s'"  Labuxiere  p^  le  s'"  dubuq  trois  Cent 
livres  de  farine  quil  est  Convenu  devant  la  Cour  redevoir  p^  tous 
Compte. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
M^  aRondel  representant  Le  S^  Laforme  demandeur  Contre 
FRANCOIS   Clark  absent  apres  assignation  recue 
a  Comparoir  ce  jourdhuy. 

Le  demandeur  reclame  un  compte  de  des  domagement  a 
faute  par  led*  Clark  de  luy  avoir  paye  suivant  son  billet  quarante 
deux  minots  ^  de  bled,  Echus  depuis  decembre  dernier,  la  Cour 
Enule  le  Compte  en  des  domagement  Et  condamne  led*  Clark  a 
payer  sans  delais  les  quarante  deux  minots  Et  demy  de  Bled 
faute  de  quoy  permis  de  Saisir  et  vendre  jusqua  parfa'it  payement 
interest  et  frais  ce  qui  sera  Execute. 

a  la  meme  Cour. 

M^  Clamorgan  est  intervenu  sur  la  sentence  cy  dessus  lequel 
a  Exibe  deux  billets  dus  par  le  Nomme  francois  Clark  Echus 
dequis  lannde  derniere  montant  a  la  quantite  de  onze  Cent 
quarante  livres  de  tabac  lequel  nous  a  requis  Comme  plus  ancien 
Creanciers  dEtre  privilegie  sur  les  Biens  dud*  Clark  p^  son  paye- 

1  Evidently  an  attempt  to  make  the  Americans  pay  church  tithes.  From  Colonel  Har- 
mer's  statement,  it  is  evident  that  the  Americans  were  paying  nothing  for  the  support  of  the 
government  or  chuich  in  the  year,  1787. —  Smi.h,  St.  Claire  Papers,  II.,  31. 

2  To  what  line  this  refers  is  not  known. 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1789  365 

his  obligation  as  penalty  for  not  having  fulfilled  its  condition.  And 
it  condemns  him  furthermore  to  deliver  all  at  the  St.  Louis*  resi- 
dence of  M.  Morgan  for  not  having  made  delivery  thereof  at  the 
time  to  which  he  pledged  himself  and  where  the  said  plaintifif 
could  have  had  it  transported  without  expense;  and  condemns 
him  furthermore  in  all  the  costs  and  charges,  for  which  there  will 
be  execution. 

At  the  same  Court. 

To  M.  Nicolas  Smith,  Justice  of  the  Peace  of  Grand  Ruisseau. 

You  are  ordered  to  take  the  deposition  of  all  the  inhabitants 
of  your  district  who  have  sown  and  harvested  wheat  and  corn, 
and  they  are  to  make  a  statement  on  oath  as  justly  as  it  is  possible 
in  regard  to  the  quantity  that  they  have  gathered,  in  order  to  pay 
the  twenty-sixth  part  to  whomever  authority  shall  be  given  by 
our  Court  to  receive  the  said  tithe.  ^ 

There  shall  be  granted  a  delay  until  after  harvest  to  those  who 
absolutely  cannot  pay  at  present,  it  being  well  understood  that 
this  applies  only  to  those  who  are  within  the  line  drawn  by  M. 
Girardin,  our  surveyor.^ 

An  order  delivered  to  Michel  Olf  and  Geot-ge  Biggs,  addressed 
to  M.  Smith,  to  cause  Joseph  Worley  to  appear  to  answer  their 
prayers  and  to  obtain  the  payment  of  that  which  he  owes  them 
and  to  render  justice  to  whom  it  shall  belong,  the  said  day  and 
year. 

An  order  delivered  to  M.  5mith  to  compel  Joseph  Worley  to 
pay  twenty  livres  which  he  owes  to  M.  Labuxiere. 

A  verbal  order  delivered  by  the  Court  to  compel  M.  Smith  on 
his  word  to  deliver  to  M.  Labuxiere  for  M.  Dubuque  three  hun- 
dred pounds  of  flour,  which  it  is  agreed  before  the  Court  he  owes 
for  his  account  in  full. 

At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Arundel  representing  M.  Laforme,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Francis 

Clark,  absent  after  summons  received  to  appear  to-day. 

The  plaintiff  claims  an  account,  with  damages  as  penalty, 
from  the  said  Clark  for  not  having  paid  according  to  his  note 
for  forty-two  and  a  half  minots  of  wheat,  due  since  last  December. 


366  ILLINOIS.  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

ment.  si  mieux  la  Cour  Nadjuge  Le  marc  La  livre  Entre  led* 
laforme  Et  led*  s^  demandeur.  sur  quoy  la  Cour  a  suspendii 
toute  saisie  accordee  aud*  s'^  Laforme  ordonne  que  led*  laforme 
ne  sera  paye  qua  marc  La  livre  avec  M'^  Glamorgan  comme 
premier  Creancier  auquel  marc  la  Lx  il  se  Restraint  condamne 
Clark  aux  frais  et  depens. 

La  Cour  est  adjourn^  au  premier  avril  1789. 

A*  Girardin  psd. 

a  la  requisition  du  S^  Wiliam  aRundel  commerceant  de 
Canada  a  Ete  Enregistre  la  Sentence  arbitrale  qui  suit. 

Nous  Soussign^s  arbitres  Nommds  par  ordre  de  la  cour  du 
district  des  cahos  du  premier  de  ce  mois  pour  decider  laffaire 
Entre  les  S^^  William  aRundel  demandeur  Contre  jean  B*®  Morel 
deffendeur  Concernant  une  pirogue  que  le  S^  arundel  dit  que  le 
S^  morel  luy  a  Enmene  de  La  prairie  du  chien  Sans  y  etre  autorise 
Et  quil  a  Ete  oblige  de  faire  Son  voyage  icy  avec  Beaucoup  de 
frais  ne  trouvan  pas  Sa  voiture  a  la  prairie  du  chien  vu  toutes  les 
pieces  produites  a  la  cour  par  les  deux  parties  Ensembles  les 
Certifficats  des  S"  hamelin  et  Blondeau  Non  Sermentes  qui 
declarent  que  le  S^  morel  a  pris  la  voiture  Sans  leurs  ordres  ni 
permission. 

Vu  aussi  les  deux  certifficats  Sermentds  devant  le  S^  Ducharme 
un  des  juges  de  la  cour  donnez  par  pierre  antaya  Et  Joseph  Leger 
dit  parisien  qui  detruisent  par  leur  Serment  les  deux  precedants 
certifl&cats.  Nous  sommes  dopinion  que  le  S^  Wiliam  aRundel 
Soit  deboute  de  sa  demande  Enver  led*  morel  tant  du  payement 
de  la  dite  pirogue  que  de  tons  des  domagements  Et  quelle  restera 
pour  son  compte  Et  risques  Et  cependant  pour  le  tems  et  ser- 
vice que  led*  morel  a  Et  de  la  pirogue  nous  estimons  quil  doit 
payer  la  moitie  des  frais  du  proces  Et  lautre  moitid  par  le  s^  a 
Rundel  Sauf  aud*  S^  a  Rundel  son  recour  contre  le  S^  amelin  pour 
le  payement  de  la  pirogue,  frais  Et  tons  Et  tous  [sic]  des  domage- 
ments sil  la  pretee  au  s'"  morel  de  son  Chef  Sans  lordre  dud* 
S^  a  Rundel  aux  Cahos  le  six  decembre  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt 
huit.     Signe  Saucier,  Dumoulin  Et  Labuxiere  arbitres  Nommds. 

^  See  note,   p,  52. 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1789  367 

The  Court  set  aside  the  account  for  damages  and  condemns  the 
said  Clark  to  pay  without  delay  the  forty-two  and  a  half  minots  of 
wheat;  in  default  of  which  it  is  permitted  to  seiz^  and  sell  suffi- 
cient for  perfect  payment  with  interest  and  costs,  for  which  there 
will  be  execution. 

At  the  same  Court. 

M.  Clamorgan  became  a  party  to  the  above  judgment,  and 
he  exhibited  two  notes  due  by  the  named  Francis  Clark,  matured 
since  last  year,  and  which  amount  to  the  quantity  of  eleven  hundred 
and  forty  pounds  of  tobacco;  and  he  prayed  us,  as  older  creditor, 
to  be  given  preference  on  the  property  of  the  said  Clark  for  his 
payment;  if  the  Court  does  not  prefer  to  adjudge  the  mark  in 
the  pound  ^  between  the  said  Laforme  and  the  said  plaintiff. 
Whereupon  the  Court  stayed  all  seizure  granted  to  the  said  M. 
Laforme  and  decrees  that  the  said  Laforme  shall  be  paid  only 
his  percentage  of  the  assets  with  M.  Clamorgan  as  first  creditor, 
to  which  percentage  he  is  restricted.  Condemned  Clark  to  pay  the 
costs  and  charges. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  ist  of  April,  1789. 

Ant.  Girardin,  Pres. 

At  the  request  of  M.  William  Arundel,  trader  from  Canada, 
there  has  been  registered  the  verdict  by  arbitration  which 
follows: 

We,  the  undersigned  arbitrators,  named  by  order  of  the  Coiu^t 
of  the  district  of  Cahokia  on  the  first  of  this  month  to  decide  the 
cause  between  MM.  William  Arundel,  plaintiff,  vs.  Jean  Bte. 
Morel,  defendant,  concerning  a  pirogue,  which  M.  Arundel  said 
M.  Morel  had  taken  from  him  at  Prairie  du  Chien  without  author- 
ity so  that  he  had  been  obliged  to  make  his  journey  here  at  great 
expense,  because  he  did  not  find  his  boat  at  Prairie  du  Chien : 
considering  all  the  documents  exhibited  to  the  Court  by  the  two 
parties,  together  with  the  certificates  of  MM.  Hamelin  and  Blon- 
deau,  not  made  under  oath,  and  which  afl&rm  that  M.  Morel 
took  the  boat  without  their  order  or  permission;  considering 
also  the  two  certificates,  sworn  to  before  M.  DuCharme,  one  of 
the  justices   of   the  Court,  given  by  Pierre  Antaya  and  Joseph 


368  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

V<i  la  Sentence  arbitrale  de  lautre  part  produite  a  la  cour  de  ce 
jour,  laquelle  Sentence  la  cour  a  homologue  et  homologue  par  ces 
presentes  Et  ordonne  quelle  Sortira  Son  plain  Et  Entier  Effet  tant 
contre  le  s'"  a  Rondel  que  contre  le  S^  hamelin  Sur  Lequel  le  S*" 
arondel  aura  Son  recour  pour  le  payement  de  sa  pirogue  Et  frais 
ainsi  qui!  est  explique  En  ladite  Sentence  donne  En  Cour  le  deux 
mars  mil  sept  Cent  quatre  vingt  neuf.  sign^  J.  B.  Dubuq.  henry 
Biron.  ducharme.  p^^  Laperche.  Philipe  Engel.  ant.  Girardin. 

A*  Girardin 


a  une  Cour  du  Six  avril  1789. 

Le  S^  jean  B*^  LaCroix  Sest  present^  pour  faire  deliberer  sur 
le  prix  des  danrees  p^  le  payement  de  ceux  qui  doivent  a  I'Eglise 
a  Et^  delibere  par  la  cour  que  la  farine  sera  prise  a  vingt  livres 
le  Cent,  Le  bled  froment  Bien  net  et  Bien  Epurd  a  Six  livres  le 
minot. 

Le  mahis  vane  Et  recevable  Examt  de  moisisure  et  pouriture  a 
quatre  livres  le  minot. 

Et  le  lard  sal^  des  hosse  [sic]  Bien  conditione  a  vingt  sols  le  tout 
sur  le  pied  de  largent  Et  la  cour  condamne  Les  debiteurs  a  payer 
sans  delais  le  montant  de  leurs  dits  Billets  a  quoy  faire  ils  Seront 
contraint  par  Saisie  Et  vente  de  leurs  Biens  mandons  a  Ihuissier 
de  cette  cour  de  metre  la  presente  sentence  a  execution  nonobstant 
toute  oposition.  arrete  lesd  jour  Et  an. 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1789  369 

Leger  called  Parisien,  which  certificates  destroy  by  their  oath  the 
two  preceding  certificates;  we  are  of  the  opinion  that  the  demands 
of  M.  William  Arundel  against  the  said  Morel  as  well  for  payment 
for  the  said  pirogue  as  for  damages  be  denied  and  that  the  pirogue 
remain  at  his  risk  and  loss;  and  yet  for  the  time  and  service  which 
the  said  Morel  has  had  of  the  said  pirogue,  we  estimate  that  he 
ought  to  pay  half  of  the  costs  of  the  suit  and  that  the  other 
half  be  paid  by  M.  Arundel;  reserving  to  the  said  M.  Arundel 
his  recourse  against  M.  Hamelin  for  the  payment  of  the  pirogue 
with  costs  and  all  damages,  if  he  lent  it  of  his  own  accord 
without  the  order  of  the  said  M.  Arundel.  At  Cahokia  December 
6,  1789.  Signed,  Saucier,  Dumoulin  and  Labuxiere,  arbitrators 
named. 

Having  seen  the  verdict  by  arbitration  on  the  other  side  brought 
into  Court  this  day,  the  Court  affirmed  and  does  afl&rm  this 
verdict  by  these  presents,  and  decrees  that  it  shall  have  its  full  and 
entire  effect  as  well  against  M.  Arundel  as  against  M.  Hamelin 
against  whom  M.  Arundel  shall  have  his  recourse  for  the  payment 
of  his  pirogue  and  costs,  as  is  set  forth  in  the  said  verdict.  Given 
in  Court  March  2,  1789.  Signed,  J.  B.  Dubuque,  Henry  Biron 
DuCharme,  Pierre  Laperche,  Philippe  Engel,  Ant.  Girardin. 

Ant.  Girardin. 

At  a  Court  April  6,  1789. 

M.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix  presented  himself  in  order  to  have  a 
decision  given  on  the  price  of  commodities  paid  by  those  who 
owe  the  church.  The  Court  determined  that  flour  shall  be  taken 
at  twenty  livres  the  hundred;  wheat  clean  and  well  winnowed  at 
six  livres  the  minot. 

Corn  winnowed  and  acceptable,  free  from  mold  and  brown 
rust,  at  four  livres  the  minot. 

And  bacon  cured  des  hosse  [?]  in  good  condition  at  twenty  sols, 
all  on  the  basis  of  money.  And  the  Court  condemned  the  debtors 
to  pay  without  delay  the  amount  of  their  said  notes,  to  do  which  they 
shall  be  constrained  by  seizure  and  sale  of  their  property.  We  con- 
demn the  huissier  of  this  Court  to  put  the  present  decree  in  execu- 
tion, notwithstanding  all  opposition.  Decreed  the  said  day  and  year. 


370  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  une  Cour  du  Six  avril  1789. 
M'"  Jacques  De  Glamorgan  Sest  presente  p^  Et  au  Nom  du 
s^  jean  B^^  Pratte  charg^  de  la  procuration  de  dame  archange 
Prate  veuve  de  deffunt  le  s'"  augustin  Dubuque  decedde  aux  Cahos 
aux  Ilinois  le  8  9^^^  1787.  led*  S^  de  Glamorgan  demandeur  En 
reclamation  des  douaires  Et  preciput  accorde  a  ladite  dame  veuve 
par  son  contrat  de  mariage  pass^  En  Entr'Ele  [sic]  Et  led*  deffunt 
au  moyen  de  la  renonciation  quelle  a  faite  a  la  Gommunaute  dentr- 
elle  Et  led*  deffunt.  Vu  par  la  cour  le  Susdit  contract  de  mariage 
En  datte  du  dix  sept  octobre  mil  sept  cent  soixante  dix  huit  passe 
devant  M^  fauher  N^^  de  La  province  de  quebec  par  lequel  il 
est  Constitu^  p'"  douaire  a  ladite  dame  veuve  La  Somme  de  Ginq 
mille  livres  de  douaire  prefix  et  3  ans  retour  et  p^  preciput  la 
somme  de  quinze  cent  livres  formant  En  total  la  somme  de  six 
mille  Ginq  cent  livres,  yH  aussi  une  declaration  En  forme  dinvan- 
taire  Estimatif  des  meubles  Et  effets  qui  se  sont  trouvez  ches  la 
dame  dubuque  En  Canada  fait  par  M'"  le  Quay  Et  papineau 
jqres  lEgalise  par  M^  de  Ronville  juge  a  montreal,  montant  a  la 
somme  de  douze  Gent  quatre  vingt  deux  livres  un  sol  qui  sont  a 
deduire  sur  ladite  somme  de  six  mille  Ginq  cent  livres  partant 
Reste  p^  les  reprises  de  ladite  dame  veuve  la  somme  de  Ginq  mille 
deux  Gent  dix  sept  livres  dix  neuf  sols.  Vu  aussi  la  procuration 
de  ladite  dame  adressee  aud*  s^  jean  B*^  Pratte  pour  recevoir  Ses 
droits  aux  ilinois  En  datte  du  Sept  juin  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt 
huit  duement  Legalizee  En  bonne  form  le  tout  Gonsidere  et 
murement  Examine  La  Gour  a  aloue  et  aloue  a  ladite  dame  veuve 
dubuque  ladite  somme  de  six  mille  Ginq  cent  livres  p^  son  douaire 
Et  preciput  sur  laquelle  somme  il  sera  deduit  celle  de  douze  cent 
quatre  vingt  deux  livres  un  sols  quelle  a  retenu  par  ses  mains 
Suivant  letat  Estimatif  cy  dessus  mentionne  Et  En  concequance 
luy  sera  paye  la  s^  de  Ginq  mille  deux  cent  dix  sept  livres  dix 
neuf  sols  p^  tous  droits  quelle  a  a  Esperer  sur  ladite  sucession 
dud*  deffunt  son  mary  aux  ilinois  que  le  s^  Labuxiere  Charge  du 
recouvrement  luy  comptera  aussitost  quil  aura  recouvre  des  fonds 
suffisament  p^  Remplir  ladite  ladite  [sic]  somme  Et  dont  il  luy  sera 

^  For  other  references  to  this  same  case  see  pp.  309-313,315,  323-327,  385-381,  393, 
429.  513- 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1789  371 

At  a  Court  April  6,  1789. 

M.  Jacques  Clamorgan  presented  himself  for  and  in  the  name 
of  M.  Jean  Bte.  Pratte  intrusted  with  the  power  of  attorney  of 
Madame  Archange  Pratte,  widow  of  the  deceased  M.  Augustin 
Dubuque,  who  died  at  Cahokia  in  the  Illinois  November  8,  1787, 
and  brought  suit  for  dower  rights  and  jointure,  which  were 
accorded  to  the  said  widow  by  her  contract  of  marriage,  passed 
between  her  and  the  said  deceased,  on  the  plea  of  the  renunciation 
which  she  has  made  of  the  community  of  goods  between  her  and 
the  said  deceased.^ 

The  Court  having  seen  the  contract  of  marriage  aforesaid 
under  date  of  October  17, 1778,  passed  before  M.  Faucher,  notary  of 
the  province  of  Quebec,  by  which  there  is  settled  on  the  said 
widow  for  dower  the  sum  of  five  thousand  livres  of  fixed  dower 
and  three  years  reversion  and  for  jointure  the  sum  of  fifteen 
hundred  livres;  and  having  seen  also  an  affidavit  in  the  form  of 
an  appraised  inventory  of  furniture  and  effects,  which  are  at  the 
house  of  Madame  Dubuque  in  Canada,  made  by  M,  Le  Guay 
and  Papineau,  notaries,  and  legalized  by  M.  de  Rouville,  justice 
at  Montreal,  and  amounting  to  the  sum  of  twelve  hundred  and 
eighty-two  livres  one  sol,  which  are  to  be  deducted  from  the  said 
sum  of  six  thousand  five  hundred  livres;  therefore  there  remains 
for  the  recovery  by  the  said  widow  the  sum  of  five  thousand  two 
hundred  and  seventeen  livres  nineteen  sols;  having  seen  also  the 
power  of  attorney  of  the  said  lady,  sent  to  the  said  M.  Jean  Bte. 
Pratte  empowering  him  to  receive  her  just  dues  in  the  Illinois, 
dated  June  7,  1788,  duly  legalized  in  good  form:  all  having  been 
considered  and  carefully  examined,  the  Court  allowed  and  does 
allow  the  said  Madame  Dubuque,  widow,  the  said  sum  of  six  thou- 
sand five  hundred  livres  for  her  dower  and  jointure,  from  which 
sum  there  shall  be  deducted  the  sum  of  twelve  hundred  and 
eighty-two  livres  one  sol,  which  she  has  retained  in  her  hands 
according  to  the  statement  of  the  appraisement  mentioned  above; 
and  consequently  there  shall  be  paid  to  her  the  sum  of  five  thou- 
sand two  hundred  and  seventeen  livres  nineteen  sols  to  satisfy 
all  her  just  claims  which  she  has  a  right  to  expect  from  the  said 


372  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

ten<i  compte  sur  laqutaitnce  quil  En  raportera  dud*  s'"  jean  B*« 
pratte  a  bas  de  la  susdite  procuration  ce  qui  sera  Execute  non- 
obstant  toute  oposition  et  par  privilege  a  tous  autres  Creancier 
fait  et  donn^  par  la  Cour  lesd*  jour  Et  an 
[Signed] 
hBI  pierre  la  perche 

DuCharme  B*®  Dubuque 

Phillipe  Engel  Sa 

Louis  +  chatel. 
marque 
Labuxiere  Grefier  A*  Girardin. 

a  la  meme  cour. 
M'"  Reilhe  a  presente  une  requete  contre  Izidore  la  Croix  Charge 
des  affaires  de  gigon  p^  la  sucession  de  dubuque  par  lapoint^ 
de  la  Cour  ordonn^  quil  sera  surcit  jusqua  lariv^  dud*  s^  LaCroix. 
La  Cour  est  ajourn^  au  i^^  May  prochain. 

A*  Girardin. 


a  une  Cour  du  i^^  May  1789. 
Francois  Chevalier  demandeur  Contre  Louis  Ciquar  deffen- 
deur  et  denis  lavertu 

Le  demandeur  Reclame  quinze  livres  p^  lexcedant  du  loyer 
d'un  Canot  quil  a  loue  au  deffendeur  pour  mois  qui  luy  a  Et^ 
paye  mais  Comme  Le  deffendeur  a  gard^  le  canot  plus  longtems 
le  demandeur  Reclame  ladite  somme  de  quinze  livres  p^  une 
partie  de  Ihiver. 

Le  deffendeur  a  replique  quil  croyoit  Lavoir  Bien  pay^  et 
quil  ne  croyoit  pas  luy  devoir. 

Le  demandeur  offre  Son  Sermant  que  les  quinze  livres  luy 
sont  dus  ce  qui  a  Et6  accept^  par  le  deffendeur. 

Sur  quoy  la  Cour  a  fait  faire  Sermant  aud*  francois  Chevalier 
Et  Condamn^  le  deffendeur  a  luy  payer  ladite  somme  de  quinze 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1789  373 

estate  of  the  said  deceased,  her  husband,  at  the  Illinois,  which  sum 
M.  Labuxiere,  intrusted  with  the  recovery,  will  pay  to  her  as  soon 
as  he  shall  have  collected  funds  sufficient  to  make  up  the  said 
sum,  and  there  shall  be  rendered  an  accounting  thereof  to  him 
on  the  receipt,  written  on  the  bottom  of  the  power  of  attorney 
aforesaid,  which  he  will  obtain  from  the  said  M.  Jean  Bte.  Pratte, 
for  which  there  will  be  execution  notwithstanding  all  opposition 
and  by  preference  to  all  other  creditors.  Made  and  given  by  the 
Court  the  said  day  and  year. 
[Signed]  Pierre  Laperche. 

hBi  Bte.  Dubuque. 

DuCharme.  His 

Philippe  Engel.  Louis  +  Chatel 

mark 
Labuxiere,  Clerk.  Ant.  Girardin. 

At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Reilhe  presented  a  petition  against  Isidore  LaCroix  in- 
trusted with  the  cause  of  Gigon  against  the  estate  of  Dubuque. 
By  the  reference  of  the  Court  it  was  decreed  that  it  shall  be 
stayed  till  the  arrival  of  the  said  M.  LaCroix. 
The  Court  adjourned  to  the  first  of  May  next. 

Ant.  Girardin. 
At  a  Court,  May  i,  1789. 
Francois  Chevalier,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Louis  Ciquar  and  Denis 
Lavertu,  Defendants. 
The  plaintiff  claims  fifteen  livres  for  the  additional  rent  of  a 
canoe,  which  he  rented  the  defendant  for  a  month,  which  rent 
has  been  paid;   but  since  the  defendant  kept  the  canoe  a  longer 
time,  the  plaintiff  claims  the  said  sum  of  fifteen  livres  for  the  rent 
during  a  part  of  the  winter. 

The  defendant  replied  that  he  believed  that  he  had  paid  him 
enough  and  that  he  did  not  think  he  was  in  debt  to  him. 

The  plaintiff  offers  his  oath  that  the  fifteen  livres  are  due  him 
and  this  was  accepted  by  the  defendant. 

Whereupon  the  Court  caused  Francois  Chevalier  to  take  oath 
and  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay  him  the  said  sum  of  fifteen 


374  ILLINOIS.HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

livres  Et  condamne  les  defendeur  Sivtx  frais  que  nous  avons  liquidez 
a  dix  livres  qui  sont  dus  au  grefier  a  deffaud  par  Ihuissier  davoir 
delivrd  Lordre  lesquels  frais  seront  avancds  par  le  s^  Chevalier 
sauf  son  Rembourcement  Enver  le  deffendeur  ce  qui  sera  Execute. 

B*e  Dubuque 

du  Six  May  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  neuf  a  une  Cour  Ex- 
traordinaire tenue  a  la  demande  de  francois  huberdeau. 

Led*  S^  HUBERDEAU  demandeuT  Contre  la  sucession  de  deffunt 
AUGUSTiN  Dubuque  En  privilege  de  Sa  Creance  sur  laquelle  Est 
intervene  M''^  Reilhe  charge  de  la  procuration  de  M^  Gamelin 
Et  M^  Izadore  LaCroix  oposant  aud*  privilege  dautre  part,  def- 
fendeur M^  De  Rocheblave  aussi  oposant  aud*  privilege. 

Sur  les  representation  que  francois  huberdeau  a  fait  a  la  Cour 
quil  est  party  de  Canada  pour  venir  recevoir  Les  droits  qui  luy 
Revenoit  dans  la  sucession  de  feu  jean  B*^  huberdeau  Son  frere 
decede  aux  ilinois,  Sur  lesquels  droits  deffunt  le  S^  augustin  du- 
buque  a  recu  de  Simon  huberdeau  Son  frere  la  quantity  de  deux 
cent  piastres  gourdes  pour  luy  faire  toucher  En  Canada  suivant 
lobligation  dud*  deffunt  dubuque  cautionnee  par  le  s^  Joseph 
Marie  Papin  passee  devant  M^  Cruzat  commandant  de  la  partie 
espagnole  a  S*  Louis,  sur  laquelle  somme  luy  a  Et6  offerte  par 
madame  dubuque  En  Canada  huit  cent  cinquant  deux  livres  aux 
Conditions  quil  donneroit  une  quittance  generale  pour  tous  Ses 
droits  dans  la  Sucession  dud*  deffunt  jean  B*^  huberdeau  son  frere 
ce  quil  a  refuse  Et  a  En  concequance  pris  le  party  de  venir  luy 
meme  a  la  poursuite  de  Ses  droits  contre  son  frere  simon  huberdeau, 
Et  En  meme  tems  reclamer  sur  la  sucession  de  deffunt  dubuque  les 
deux  cent  piastres  gourdes  quil  devoit  luy  faire  toucher  En 
Canada  En  vertu  de  Sa  Susdite  obligation  En  datte  du  23  may 
1786  avec  les  frais  et  depens  quil  est  oblig^  de  faire  conclud  a  ce 
que  ladite  somme  de  deux  cent  piastres  luy  soit  payee  par  ladite 
Sucession  Et  tous  Ses  frais  et  depens. 

oui  M''^  Reilhe,  Izadore  laCroix  Representant  M*"^  P^^  Gamelin 

1  This  is  the  son  of  Philippe  de  Rocheblave,  the  former  acting  governor  of  Illinois,  not  the 
governor  himself,  as  is  proved  by  his  signature,  which  is  totally  diifferent  from  that  of  the  elder 
Rocheblave. 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1789  375 

livres  and  condemns  the  defendant  to  pay  the  costs,  which  we 
have  set  at  ten  livres^  which  are  due  to  the  clerk  because  of  the 
failure  of  the  huissier  to  deliver  the  summons,  which  costs  shall 
be  advanced  by  M.  Chevalier,  reserving  his  reimbursement  from 
the  defendant,  for  which  there  will  be  execution. 

Bte.  Dubuque. 

The  6th  of  May,  1789,  at  a  special  session  of  the  Court  held 
on  the  petition  of  Francois  Huberdeau. 

The  said  M,  Huberdeau,  Plaintiff,  claiming  as  preferred 
creditor,  vs.  the  estate  of  the  deceased  Augustin  Dubuque 
in  which  suit  there  intervened  M.  Reilhe,  intrusted  with 
the  power  of  attorney  by  M.  Gamelin,  and  M.  Isidore 
LaCroix,  both  opposing  the  said  privilege,  and  of  the  other  part 
M.  de  Rocheblave,^  defendent,  also  opposing  the  said  privilege. 

Francois  Huberdeau  sets  forth  to  the  Court  that  he  left  Canada 
to  come  to  receive  the  just  dues,  which  accrued  to  him  from 
the  estate  of  the  late  Jean  Bte.  Huberdeau,  his  brother,  deceased 
in  the  Illinois;  of  which  dues  the  deceased  M.  Augustin  Dubuque 
received  from  Simon  Huberdeau,  his  brother,  the  sum  of  two  hun- 
dred piastres  gourdes,  in  order  that  he  might  remit  them  to  him  in 
Canada,  according  to  the  obligation  of  the  said  deceased  Dubuque 
which  was  guaranteed  by  Joseph  Marie  Pepin  and  drawn  before 
M.  Cruzat,  commandant  of  the  Spanish  side  at  St.  Louis ;  of  which 
sum  there  had  been  offered  him  in  payment  by  Madame  Dubuque  in 
Canada  eight  hundred  and  fifty- two  livres  on  condition  that  he  should 
give  a  receipt  in  full  for  all  his  just  dues  in  the  estate  of  the  said 
Jean  Bte.  Huberdeau,  his  brother,  which  he  refused;  and  conse- 
quently he  resolved  to  come  himself  to  sue  for  his  rights  against 
his  brother,  Simon  Huberdeau,  and  at  the  same  time  to  claim  from 
the  estate  of  the  deceased  Dubuque  the  two  hundred  piastres 
Gourdes  which  he  [Dubuque]  ought  to  have  remitted  to  him  in 
Canada  in  virtue  of  the  obligation  aforesaid  under  date  of  May  23, 
1786,  together  with  the  costs  and  charges,  which  he  has  been 
obliged  to  make;  and  he  concludes  that  the  same  sum  of  three 
hundred  piastres  should  be  paid  him  by  the  said  estate  with  all 
costs  and  charges. 


376  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

et  Gigon  Et  M^  de  Rocheblave  agissant  En  Son  Nom  Lesquels 
ont  demand^  Et  represente  que  led*  francois  huberdeau  ne 
pouvoit  Etre  recu  Creancier  privilegie  aux  ilinois  p^  y  recevoir  les 
deux  cent  piastres  par  luy  demand^  i"  parcequil  Les  avoit 
ref usees  en  Canada  2°  En  ce  que  le  S^  Dubuque  avoit  fait  una 
faillite  Et  que  En  concequance  sa  Creance  ne  devoit  pas  Etre 
regardee  Comme  priviligie  Et  quil  devoit  etre  Renvoyd  au  Sindic 
qui  sera  nomme  par  les  Creanciers  En  vertu  de  la  sentence  de 
la  Cour  dui^^  decembre  1788.  Requerant  a  ce  Effet  le  Renvoy 
dud*  huberdeau  Et  quil  soit  deboute  de  Son  pretendii  privilege 
par  luy  demands. 

Parties  ouies  En  leurs  demandes  Repliques,  responses  Requi- 
sitions Et  Conclusions,  la  Cour  apres  avoir  murement  examine 
Et  delibere  Sur  ladite  affaire,  Elle  a  re^ii  Et  refoit  led*  francois 
huberdeau  au  nombres  des  Creanciers  privilegie  sur  la  Sucession 
de  deffunt  augustin  dubuque  pour  les  deux  cent  piastres  gourdes 
que  led*  deffunt  lui  devoit  faire  toucher  En  Canada  Sans  aucunne 
Condition  ny  renonciation  a  Ses  autres  droits  ce  qui  la  Empeche 
de  recevoir  la  dite  somme  En  Canada  des  mains  de  madame 
dubuque.  ordonne  ladite  Cour  quil  Sera  Nomme  trois  Negociants 
pour  faire  le  valuation  des  piastres  En  Canada  Et  de  la  dif- 
ferance  des  ilinois  pour  le  Surplus  luy  etre  paye  avec  le  Capital 
des  deux  cent  paistres  En  Bon  de  la  Caisse  espagnole  Et  pelterie 
tel  que  le  Charge  de  la  sucession  poura  les  recevoir  Et  quand 
au  compte  du  frais  et  depens  que  led*  francois  huberdeau  a  pro- 
duit  a  la  Cour  ce  jour,  ordonne  pareillem*  ladite  Cour  quil  sera 
tax6  par  les  meme  arbitres.  condamme  la  sucession  dubuque 
aux  frais  de  lextraord^^  de  la  presente  Cour  suivant  le  Compte 
qui  en  sera  produit  Et  varete  par  un  des  magistra  de  cette  dite 
Cour  pour  les  dites  sommes  jointes  Et  evaluees  Etre  payee  pri- 
vilegierement  par  le  s'*  Labuxiere  charge  de  ladite  sucession  avant 
toute  delivraison  de  deniers  aux  autres  Creanciers. 

Laquelle  Creance  nous  accordons  privilegierement  comme 
ayant  Ete  form^e  aux  ilinois  Et  En  concequance  y  Etre  liquid^es. 
dont  led*  s^  Labuxiere    Sera  Bien  et  valablement  decharg^  En 

,  1  The  correct  date  is  December  i,  1787.     See  supra,  p.  311. 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1789  377 

Heard  MM.  Reilhe,  Isidore  LaCroix,  representing  MM.  Pierre 
Gamelin  and  Gigon,  and  M.  de  Rocheblave  acting  in  his  own 
name,  who  prayed  and  set  forth  that  the  said  Francois  Huberdeau 
could  not  be  received  as  preferred  creditor  in  the  lUinois  to  receive 
there  the  two  hundred  piastres  demanded  by  him :  firstly,  because 
he  had  refused  them  in  Canada;  secondly,  because  M.  Dubuque 
had  become  bankrupt  and  that  consequently  his  claim  ought  not 
to  be  regarded  as  preferred  and  that  he  ought  to  be  referred  to  the 
syndic  who  shall  be  named  by  the  creditors  in  virtue  of  the  decree 
of  the  Court  of  December  i,  1788^;  and  they  therefore  pray  for 
the  dismissal  of  the  said  Huberdeau,  and  that  the  pretended 
privilege  demanded  by  him  be  denied. 

After  the  parties  were  heard  in  their  prayers,  replications, 
answers,  requisitions  and  conclusions,  the  Court,  after  having 
maturely  examined  and  deliberated  on  the  said  cause,  received 
and  does  receive  the  said  Francois  Huberdeau  in  the  number 
of  preferred  creditors  of  the  estate  of  the  deceased  Augustin 
Dubuque  for  the  two  hundred  piastres  gourdes,  which  the  said 
deceased  should  have  sent  him  in  Canada,  without  any  condition 
or  renunciation  of  his  other  rights  which  hindered  him  from 
receiving  the  said  sum  in  Canada  from  the  hands  of  Madame 
Dubuque;  and  the  Court  decrees  that  there  shall  be  named  three 
merchants  to  make  the  evaluation  of  the  piastres  in  Canada  and 
of  the  difference  in  Illinois  in  order  that  the  excess  be  paid  to 
him  with  the  capital  of  two  hundred  piastres  in  Spanish  treasury- 
notes  and  peltries,  as  the  trustee  of  the  estate  may  receive  them; 
and  as  to  the  account  of  costs  and  charges  which  the  said  Francois 
Huberdeau  brought  into  Court  this  day,  the  said  Court  decrees 
likewise  that  it  shall  be  determined  by  the  same  arbitrators;  it 
condemns  the  estate  of  Dubuque  to  pay  the  costs  of  the  present 
special  session  according  to  the  account  which  shall  be  produced 
and  verified  by  one  of  the  magistrates  of  this  Court,  in  order  that 
the  said  sums  joined  and  evaluated  be  paid  by  preference  by  M. 
Labuxiere,  trustee  of  the  said  estate,  before  any  payment  of 
money  to  other  creditors. 

This  debt  we  accord  the  right  of  preference,  since  it  was 


378  ILLINOIS^HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Raportant  lobligation  dud^  s'"  dubuque  quittance  par  led*  francois 
huberdeau  avec  le  Compte  produit  dud*  huberdeau  et  frais  de 
justice  fait  et  delibere  En  Cour  par  M""^  antoine  Girardin  Presidant, 
Charles  duCharme,  Philipe  Engel,  henry  Biron,  pierre  Laperche, 
jean  B*^  Dubuque,  Et  Louis  Chatel  Magistrats  pour  Etre  Execute 
Nonobstant  toute  oposition  lesd*  jour  et  an. 
[Signed] 

B  Dubuque  Philipe  Engel 

henry  hBI  Biron  Pierre  Laperche 

Louis  +  Chatel  Ch  DuCharme 

A*  Girardin. 
a  la  meme  Cour. 
M'^  Reilhe  representant  M^  Gamelin  Contre  M^  Izadore 
LaCroix  representant  M^  Gigon. 
M^  Reilhe  en  sa  dite  qualite  a  prouve  que  led*  s^  Izadore 
laCroix  ne  pouvoit  Etre  recu  Creanciers  privilegie  sur  les  Biens 
de  deffunt  augustin  dubuque  i''  En  ce  que  la  Saisie  provisoire 
quil  a  obtenu  du  vivant  du  s^  dubuque  Est  ilegale  et  que  led* 
deffunt  dubuque  Est  mort  dans  linstant  de  la  saisie  Netant  dail- 
leur  que  provisoire  Et  que  la  Cour  na  point  fait  droit  sous  la 
huitaine  porte  par  les  ord^^^  de  La  validite  de  ladite  Saisie  2° 
que  la  sentence  que  led*  S^  Izidore  LaCroix  a  obtenu  de  la  Cour 
le  7  may  1788  Est  obreptive  Et  subrebtive  La  Cour  Nayant  pas 
sufl&sament  Ete  informee  de  la  legimite  des  Creances  du  s^  gigon 
represente  par  le  s^  Isidore  LaCroix.  Concluant  a  ce  que  led* 
s'"  LaCroix  soit  Renvoye  p'"  sa  pretendue  Creance  au  sindic  des 
autres  Creanciers  apres  quil  aura  Recu  le  reliquat  de  ladite  suces- 
sion  le  s^  Gigon  netant  que  commis  du  s^  Gamelin  Et  non  Equi- 
peur  dud*  deffunt  dubuque  comme  lavance  le  s^  LaCroix. 

^  The  explanation  of  this  declaration  seems  to  be  the  following:  Isidore  La  Croix  obtained 
on  November  8,  1787,  from  the  justice  of  the  week  a  writ  of  seizure  against  Augustin  Dubuque; 
but  the  latter  died  on  the  day  the  writ  was  served.  This  writ  should  have  been  confirmed  by 
the  full  Court  within  the  week,  but  this  was  not  done,  although  some  kind  of  a  decree  was 
rendered  November  12,  1787,  and  recorded  later.  On  account  of  the  death  of  Dubuque,  it 
vi-as  disclosed  that  he  was  a  bankrupt,  and  his  creditors  attempted  to  obtain  the  rights  of  pre- 
ferred creditors;  but  the  Court  protected  first  the  rights  of  those  who  had  been  wounded  and 
whose  property  had  been  damaged  by  the  explosion  of  gunpowder,  for  which  Dubuque  was 
responsible,  and  also  the  rights  of  the  widov/  and  the  creditors  living  in  Illinois.  After  all 
tliese  had  been  paid  the  creditors  from  Canada  and  elsewhere  were  to  divide  proportionally 
the  balance  of  the  estate.  Isidore  LaCroix,  however,  expected  that  he  would  be  numbered 
among  the  preferred  creditors  because  of  his  eariier  attachment,  and  on  May  7,  1788,  he  did 
obtain  a  confirmation  of  his  claim,  which  POW  tUe  Court  after  further  investigation  disallowed. 
See  pp.  323-327- 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1789  379 

incurred  in  the  Illinois  and  consequently  should  be  liquidated 
there;  and  the  said  M.  Labuxiere  shall  be  well  and  legally  dis- 
charged thereof  when  he  shows  the  obligation  of  the  said  M.  Du- 
buque receipted  by  the  said  Franfois  Huberdeau  with  the  account 
produced  by  the  said  Huberdeau  and  the  costs  of  justice. 
Made  and  decreed  in  Court  by  MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President, 
Charles  DuCharme,  Philippe  Engel,  Henry  Biron,  Pierre  Laperche, 
Jean  Bte.  Dubuque  and  Louis  Chatel,  magistrates,  to  be  put 
in  execution  notwithstanding  all  opposition,  the  said  day  and 
year. 
[Signed] 

B.  Dubuque.  Philippe  Engel. 

Pierre  Laperche. 

Henry  hBi  Biron  Ch.  DuCharme. 

Louis  +  Chatel.  Ant.  Girardin. 

At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Reilhe  representing  M.  Gamelin,  vs.  M.  Isidore  LaCroix 
representing  M.  Gigon 
M.  Reilhe  in  his  said  capacity  proved  that  the  said  M.  Isidore 
LaCroix  could  not  be  received  as  preferred  creditor  of  the  prop- 
erty of  the  deceased  Augustin  Dubuque:  ist,  because  the  pro- 
visional seizure,  which  he  obtained  during  the  life  of  M.  Dubuque 
is  illegal  and  because  the  said  deceased  Dubuque  died  at  the 
moment  of  the  seizure,  which  was  moreover  only  provisional, 
and  because  the  Court  did  not  decree  within  the  week,  fixed  by 
its  orders,  concerning  the  validity  of  the  said  seizure;  2nd, 
because  the  decree  which  the  said  M.  Isidore  LaCroix  obtained 
from  the  Court,  May  7,  1788,  is  obreptitious  and  surreptitious, 
since  the  Court  was  not  sufficiently  informed  of  the  legitimacy 
of  the  claims  of  M.  Gigon,  represented  by  M.  Isidore  LaCroix; 
and  he  concludes  that  the  said  M.  LaCroix  should  be  referred 
for  his  pretended  claims  to  the  syndic  of  the  other  creditors  after 
the  latter  shall  have  received  the  balance  of  the  said  estate,  the 
said  Gigon  being  only  the  deputy  of  M.  Gamelin  and  not  the 
furnisher  of  the  said  deceased  Dubuque  as  M.  LaCroix  ad- 
vances.^ 


38o  ILLINOIS^  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

ouy  led*  s^  LaCroix  qui  a  persiste  dans  son  privilege  a  luy 
accorde  par  ladite  sentence  du  7  may  1788  p''  toute  deffences. 

La  Cour  apres  avoir  murement  delibere  a  mis  Et  met  ladite 
sentence  du  7  may  1788  au  Neant  comme  ayant  Ete  irendue  en 
labsence  dud*  s'^  Reilhe  obreptivement  et  subrebtivement  nayant 
pas  Ete  suffisament  informde  Et  Renvoy  led*  s^  izidore  LaCroix 
p^  toute  sa  Creances  avec  les  autres  Creanciers  a  Se  pourvoir 
ver  le  sindic  qui  sera  nomme  p^  En  Etre  delibere  ainsy  quil 
aviseron  ce  qui  sera  execute  lesd*  jour  et  an. 
[Signed] 
DuCharme  Phillipe  Engel 

B*e  Dubuque  hBi 

Pierre  Laperche  Louis  +  Chatel 

Labuxiere  A*  Girardin. 


Du  18  may  1789  a  Sept  heures  du  matin. 

delivr^  une  Saisie  a  Louis  Coste  pour  saisir  Et  arreter  une 
paire  de  Boeuf  que  pierre  Billet  a  remis  Entre  les  Mains  du  Nomme 
gassien  p^  etre  vendus  dimanche  prochain  a  deffaud  de  payement 
ladite  saisie  signe  dubuque  magistra. 

Le  meme  jour  a  Neuf  heures  du  matin. 

delivre  une  saisie  a  francois  lapensee  pour  saisir  les  memes 
Boeuf  avec  deffences  aud*  gassien  de  Sen  Dessaisir  a  peine  dEn 
repondre  que  la  Cour  Nen  ay  ordonnd. 

du  19  may  delivre  une  Saisie  provisoire  a  francois  saucier  pour 
saisir  entre  les  mains  de  pierre  durbois  deux  Bariques  de  tafia 
apartenant  a  michel  peltier  dit  antaya. 

du  20  may  1789  delivrd  un  ordre  dassignation  a  jean  farelle 
p^  faire  paroitre  paul  poupart  a  la  Cour  du  i^^  juin. 

du  2  juin  delivre  un  ordre  a  p^^  martin  Contre  p''^  Billet  p'" 
paroitre  a  la  cour  de  cejourdhuy. 


COURT  RECORD,  MAY,  1789  381 

Heard  the  said  M.  LaCroix  who  persisted  in  his  privilege 
accorded  him  by  the  said  decree  of  May  7,  1788,  in  spite  of  all 
arguments. 

The  Court,  after  having  maturely  deliberated,  annulled  and 
and  does  annul  the  said  decree  of  May  7,  1788,  as  having  been 
rendered  in  the  absence  of  the  said  M.  Reilhe  obreptitiously  and 
surreptitiously  and  since  the  Court  was  not  sufficiently  informed, 
and  it  dismisses  the  said  Isidore  LaCroix  to  plead  with  the  other 
creditors  for  all  his  claims  before  the  syndic  who  shall  be  named 
that  there  may  be  decision  thereon  as  they  shall  advise;  and  there 
will  be  execution  the  said  day  and  year. 

[Signed]  Philippe  Engel. 

DuCharme.  hBi 

Bte.  Dubuque. 

Pierre  Laperche.  Louis  +  Chatel. 

Labuxiere.  Ant.  girardin. 

May  18,  1789,  at  7  A.  M. 

Issued  a  writ  of  seizure  to  Louis  Coste  to  seize  and  secure  a 
pair  of  oxen,  which  Pierre  Billet  delivered  into  the  hands  of  the 
named  Gassien,  to  be  sold  Sunday  next  in  default  of  payment. 

The  said  seizure  signed  Dubuque,  Magistrate. 
The  same  day  at  9  A.  M. 

Issued  a  writ  of  seizure  to  Francois  Lapanc^  to  seize  the  same 
oxen  with  warning  to  the  said  Gassien  not  to  give  them  up  until 
the  Court  has  decreed  concerning  them,  on  pain  of  being  held 
responsible  therefor. 

May,  19,  issued  a  writ  of  provisional  seizure  to  Francois  Saucier 
to  seize  two  casks  of  tafia  belonging  to  Michel  PeUetier  called 
Antaya,  now  in  the  possession  of  Pierre  Dubois. 

May  20,  1789,  issued  a  summons  on  complaint  of  Jean  Farelle 
to  cause  Paul  Poupar  to  appear  at  the  Court  of  June  i. 

June  2,  issued  a  summons  on  complaint  of  Pierre  Martin 
against  Pierre  Billet  that  he  appear  at  the  Court  of  to-day. 


382  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

A  un   Cour  du  2  juin  1789. 
M'*^  Antoine  girardin  Presidant        henry  Biron 
Charle  ducharme  P^®  Laperche 

Philipe  angel  J.  B*^  Dubuque 

Pierre  martin  demandeur  Contre  pierre  Billet  deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  demande  que  led*  pierre  Billet  ay  a  luy  remetre 
une  vache  avec  son  veau  quil  luy  doit  depuis  longtems  a  quoy  led<^ 
Billet  a  repondu  que  le  s^  martin  luy  avoit  fait  saisir  un  Cheval 
qui  se  trouve  perdu. 

a  quoy  led*  martin  a  replique  que  le  Cheval  navoit  jamais  parii  et 
que  le  Cheval  netoit  pas  Existant  que  Ihuissier  lavoit  saisy  sans  le 
voir  ni  Sans  savoir  sil  Existoit  Etant  Courant  dans  les  Bois  que 
led*  Cheval  n'a  point  paru  depuis  ce  tems  quil  ne  pent  pas  re- 
pondre  du  Cheval  dautant  que  le  s'"  Thom  huissier  ne  la  point 
sequestre. 

Le  tout  considere  parties  ouies.  la  Cour  a  decide  que  si  le 
Cheval  se  retrouve  par  les  recherches  quen  fera  pierre  martin  il 
sera  Remis  par  luy  a  pierre  Billet,  Et  que  cependant  il  demeurera 
sur  les  risques  dud*  Billet,  laquelle  Recherche  sera  faite  a  la  dili- 
gences dud*  pierre  martin,  Et  condamne  led*  pierre  Billet  apres  la 
remise  dud*  Cheval.  de  livrer  sans  delais  la  vache  et  le  vau  aud  * 
martin  depens  compensez  Entreux  qui  seront  paye  st  le  compte 
que  produira  le  grefifer  ce  qui  sera  execute  Et  condamne  le  s^  Bil- 
let a  payer  la  prise  du  Cheval. 

a  la  meme  cour. 
Le  s^  jean  dumoulin  Contre  thom  Bredy 
Thom  Bredy  a  produit  un  compte  a  la  Charge  du  s^  dumoulin 
montant  a  quatre  vingt  dix  sept  livres. 

Le  S^  dumoulin  a  dit  navoir  point  Ete  assign^  quil  avoit  un 
compte  a  produire  aud*  thom  Bredy  quil  demandoit  a  Etre  ren- 
voye  a  la  cour  prochaine.  le  tout  Examine  la  Cour  a  Renvoye  les 
deux  parties  a  Se  pourvoir  pardevant  trois  arbitres  quil  nommeront 
faute  de  quoy  En  sera  Nomme  par  la  Cour  p'"  leur  raport  etre  ra- 
port^  a  ladite  cour  y  Etre  homologue  depens  reservez  jusques  aud* 
tems. 

a  la  meme  Cour  Est  comparu  Pardevant  nous  Magistra  Sou- 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1789  383 

At  a  Court,  June  2,  1789. 
MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President.       Henry  Biron. 
Charles  DuCharme.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Philippe  Engel.  J.  Bte.  Duiuque. 

Pierre  Martin,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Billet,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  prays  that  the  said  Pierre  Billet  be  held  to  deliver 
to  him  a  cow  with  her  calf,  which  he  has  owed  him  for  a  long 
time;  to  which  the  said  Billet  answered  that  M.  Martin  had 
obtained  a  seizure  on  a  horse,  which  was  lost. 

To  which  the  said  Martin  replied  that  the  horse  had  never 
appeared  and  that  the  horse  was  not  alive;  that  the  huissier  had 
put  it  under  seizure  without  seeing  it  or  knowing  if  it  was  alive, 
since  it  was  running  in  the  woods;  that  the  said  horse  has  not 
appeared  since  then;  that  he  could  not  be  responsible  for  the 
horse  in  as  much  as  M.  Tom,  huissier,  did  not  sequester  it. 

All  considered  and  after  the  parties  were  heard,  the  Court 
decided  that,  if  the  horse  is  found  through  the  searches,  which 
Pierre  Martin  shall  make  for  it,  it  shall  be  restored  by  him  to 
Pierre  Billet;  that,  however,  it  shall  be  at  the  risk  of  the  said 
Billet;  that  the  search  shall  be  made  at  the  suit  of  the  said  Pierre 
Martin;  and  the  Court  condemns  the  said  Pierre  Billet,  after 
the  delivery  of  the  said  horse,  to  deliver  without  delay  the  cow 
and  the  calf  to  the  said  Martin;  and  condemns  both  to  pay  the 
costs,  which  shall  be  paid  according  to  the  account,  which  the 
clerk  will  produce,  for  which  there  will  be  execution;  and  con- 
demns M.  Billet  to  pay  for  the  capture  of  the  horse. 
At  the  same  Court. 
M.  Jean  Dumoulin  vs.  Tom  Brady 

Tom  Brady  brought  in  an  account  charged  to  M.  Dumoulin, 
amounting  to  ninety-seven  livres. 

M.  Dumoulin  said  that  he  had  not  been  notified  and  that  he  had 
an  account  against  the  said  Tom  Brady  to  produce;  and  he  de- 
manded that  the  case  be  dismissed  to  the  next  Court.  All 
examined,  the  Court  dismissed  the  two  parties  to  plead  before  three 
arbitrators,  whom  they  shall  name,  in  default  of  which  some  shall 
be  named  by  the  Court,  and  that  their  report  be  returned  to  the 


384  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

sign^  M^  Daniel  Mel.  Doff  habitant  demeurant  aux  Caskakias 
Lequel  nous  a  requis  de  recevoir  Sa  declaration  sur  un  vol  avec 
fracture  quil  luy  a  Ete  fait  En  Sa  maison  aud*  village  de  kaskakias. 

Et  apr^s  que  led^  Daniel  michel  Doff  a  En  fait  sermant  devant 
nous  Sur  les  Saints  Evangilles  de  faire  Sa  declaration  sincere  Et 
veritable. 

a  declare  que  le  douze  du  mois  de  May  dernier  dans  la  nuit  ne 
pouvant  dire  au  juste  Iheure  que  a  la  pointe  du  jour  il  Sest  apercti 
que  le  Contreven  dune  fenetre  de  Sa  maison  avoit  Ete  force  Et  que 
Ion  avoit  arrache  Le  gond  dEn  bas  ce  qui  avoit  Ete  fait  avec  force 
dans  la  nuit  precedente,  Et  que  dans  lintsant  il  Sest  apercu  que  Sa 
negresse  Et  Son  Enfant  manquoit  avec  plusieurs  Effets  Et  meubles 
de  Sa  maison.  que  le  lendemain  il  a  Etd  informe  par  des  person- 
nes  que  la  negresse  et  Son  enfant  etoit  En  la  posession  de  M^  de 
Glamorgan  Negociant  de  S^  Louis  Et  que  Ion  lavoit  vu  Sur  le 
fleuve  avec  ladite  negresse  lenfant  Et  deux  negres  quil  avoit  fait 
saisir  a  S^^  genevieve  quil  remontoit  p'"  Revenir  a  S^  Louis  quil  y 
a  aparance  que  le  s'"  Glamorgan  a  fait  de  nuit  ches  luy  lenlevement 
de  ladite  negresse  que  quelques  jours  auparavant  le  declarant 
SEtant  trouve  a  S*  Louis  fut  voir  M^  Glamorgan  p''  le  payer  ou 
prendre  des  arangement  quil  luy  avoit  offert  des  esclaves  p^  luy 
en  procurer[?]  la  vente.  que  M^  Glamorgan  Les  avoit  propose  a 
M'"  dubreuil  et  quapres  Setre  parle  luy  declarant  est  Gonventi  avec 
M^  dobreuil  du  prix  de  dix  huit  Gent  piastres  p^  deux  negres,  deux 
negresse,  Et  deux  Enfans.  dont  M^  dubreuil  devoit  remetre  neuf 
cent  piastre  a  M^  Glamorgan  En  bon  de  la  Gaisse  ou  pelterie  En 
acompte  de  ce  quil  luy  devoit  et  quil  toucheroit  lui  declarant  les 
autres  neuf  Gent  piastres  En  especes  sonnantes  des  mains  de  M^ 
dubreuil  ce  qui  fut  signe  par  un  accord  Entre  M^  dubreuil,  M^ 
Glamorgan,  M^  george  morgan  Et  le  declarant,  qui  sobligeoit  de 
livrer  les  dits  Esclaves  a  S*^  genevieve  ches  M^  valee  ce  quil  a 
Effectue  a  la  reserve  dune  negresse  qui  etoit  acoucher  Et  quil  Etoit 
convenu  denvoyer  apres  son  retablissement  apres  que  lesd*® 
negres  ont  Ete  traverses  a  S^^  genevieve,led*  s^  Glamorgan  au  lieu  de 

1  This  declaration  was  made  by  a  Kaskaskian  in  the  court  of  Cahokia,  because  there  was 
no  court  in  his  own  village.     See  Introduciion,  p,  cxl. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1789  385 

said  Court  to  be  there  aflarmed,  costs  being  reserved  until  the  said 
time. 

At  the  same  Court  there  appeared  before  us,  the  undersigned 
magistrates,  M.  Daniel  McElduff,  inhabitant  of  Kaskaskia,  who 
has  requested  us  to  receive  his  declaration  in  regard  to  a  theft 
and  house-breaking,  which  was  made  at  his  house  in  the  said 
village  of  Kaskaskia^ 

And  after  the  said  Daniel  McElduff  made  oath  before  us  on  the 
Holy  Gospels  to  make  his  declaration  sincere  and  truthful,  he 
declared  that  on  the  twelth  of  the  month  of  May  last  —  he  is  not 
able  to  tell  the  exact  hour  but  it  was  at  the  break  of  day  —  he 
perceived  that  the  shutter  of  a  window  of  his  house  had  been 
forced  and  that  some  one  had  torn  away  the  hinge  from  the  bottom 
of  it,  and  that  it  had  been  done  with  force  in  the  preceding  night, 
and  in  a  moment  he  noticed  that  his  negress  and  her  child  were 
missing  with  several  effects  and  pieces  of  furniture;  that  the  next 
day  he  was  informed  by  some  persons  that  the  negress  and  her 
child  were  in  the  possession  of  M.  Glamorgan,  merchant  of  St. 
Louis,  and  that  he  had  been  seen  on  the  river  with  the  said 
negress  and  child  and  two  negroes  whom  he  had  had  seized  at 
Ste.  Genevieve,  and  that  he  was  ascending  the  river  to  return  to 
St.  Louis;  and  that  it  would  appear  that  M.  Glamorgan  made 
the  abduction  of  the  said  negress  at  night  from  his  house;  that 
some  days  before,  the  deponent,  being  at  St.  Louis,  went  to  see 
M.  Glamorgan  in  order  to  pay  him  or  to  make  arrangements;  that 
he  had  offered  him  slaves  to  make  a  sale  thereof  for  him;  and 
that  M.  Glamorgan  had  offered  them  to  M.  Dubreuil  and  that 
after  having  spoken  to  him  himself,  the  deponent  agreed  with  M. 
Dubreuil,  for  the  price  of  eighteen  hundred  piastres,  to  sell  him  two 
negroes,  two  negresses  and  two  children;  of  this  sum  M.  Dubreuil 
was  to  remit  nine  hundred  piastres  to  M.  Glamorgan  in  treasury 
notes  or  peltries  as  instalment  on  that  which  he,  the  deponent, 
owed,  and  that  he  would  receive  the  other  nine  hundred  piastres  in 
hard  cash  from  the  hands  of  M.  Dubreuil.  This  was  signed  by 
agreement  between  M.  Dubreuil,  M.  Glamorgan,  M.  George 
Morgan,  and  the  deponent  who  pledged  himself  to  deliver  the 


386  ILLINOIS.  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

tenir  sa  Convention  a  Surpris  une  saisie  de  M^  Peyrdt  Commandant 
a  S*  Louis  p^  semparer  des  dits  Esclaves.  a  qui  le  S^  francois  valde 
a  Eu  ordre  de  M^  peyroux  de  les  remetre  et  les  a  traduit  a  S*  Louis 
ou  ils  sont  En  sa  posession  Et  a  remis  a  M^  dubreuil  la  Convention 
quils  avoient  signd  Entreux.  et  que  quelque  jours  aprds  il  est 
descendti  avec  deux  negres  p^  faire  la  fraction  Et  lenlevement  de 
la  negresse  qui  avoit  reste.  ainsy  quil  le  depose  En  tete  de  la 
presente  declaration. 

que  comme  une  pareille  tromperie  ne  peut  etre  regardde  que 
Comme  un  vol  manifeste  Et  Enlevement  nocturne  fait  avec  frac- 
tion, et  une  supercherie  manifeste  le  declarant  a  requis  acte  contre 
led^  s^  Glamorgan  p^  Le  poursuivre  Criminellement  ou  il  pouroit 
etre  trouve  requerant  a  cette  fin  quil  luy  soit  delivre  contre  led^  de 
Glamorgan  une  prise  de  Corps  pour  etre  pris  et  arrete  sur  cette 
Rive  sil  peut  y  Etre  decouvert  declarant  que  sa  presente  deposition 
Est  sincere  Et  Veritable  sous  le  sermant  quil  a  fait. 
[Signed] 

Ducharme  Daniel  McElduff 

pierre  laperche  B*^  Dubuque 

Phillipe  Engel  A^  Girardin. 

Et  Ledit  jour  En  vertu  de  la  declaration  ci  dessus  faite  par  le 
S^  daniel  mich^  Doff  Et  de  Sa  requisition  au  bas  dicelle.  il  es  enjoint 
et  ordonne  aux  bailly.  ou  huissier  de  cette  dependances  ou  autres 
quil  apartiendra  sur  cette  Rive  ameriquaine  de  Saisir  Et  arreter  Le 
Corp  et  personne  du  S^  de  Glamorgan  par  tout  ou  il  poura  etre 
trouve  sur  cette  terre  et  dependance  ameriquaine  pour  etre  detenti 
prisonnier  dans  les  prison  de  cette  cour  ou  autres  ou  il  poura  etre 
pris  jusques  a  son  Entiere  justification  et  quil  en  soit  par  justice 
ordonne  donne  par  la  Cour  lesd^  jour  Et  an. 

A^  Girardin. 

1  At  the  end  of  the  volume  containing  thesettlement  of  the  Charleville  estate, — Cah.Rec, 
in  Belleville,  III.,  there  has  been  bound  the  follov/ing  letter  addressed  to  Antoine  Girardin: 
"Sir:  When  I  was  last  at  St.  Louis,  I  settled  all  matters  in  Difference  between  me  and  Mr. 
James  Glamorgan,  for  which  reason  and  in  pursuance  of  our  Settlement  I  beg  that  the  process 
issued  out  of  your  Court  at  my  Instance,  may.  (if  you  &  the  Court  should  think  proper)  be 
stopped  &  that  no  further  Proceedings  may  be  made  therein. 

On  my  Return  from  St.  Louis  to  this  Place  I  called  at  your  House  with  the  Intention  of 
giving  you  the  same  advice  but  as  I  was  not  fortunate  enough  to  find  you  at  Home  I  take  this 
opportunity  to  inform  you  of  it.  I  am  Sir  your  most  obedient  &  very  obliged  humble  servant, 
Danl  McElduff.     Kaskaskia  gth  July  1789  " 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1789  387 

said  slaves  at  Ste.  Genevieve  at  the  house  of  M.  Vall^ ;  and  this 
he  had  done,  with  the  exception  of  a  negress  who  was  in  child 
bed  and  whom  he  had  agreed  to  send  after  her  recovery.  After 
the  said  negroes  were  sent  across  to  Ste.  Genevieve,  the  said  M. 
Glamorgan,  instead  of  keeping  his  agreement,  obtained  by  deceit  a 
writ  of  seizure  from  M.  Peyrez,  commandant  at  St.  Louis,  to  obtain 
possession  of  the  said  slaves  and  M.  Fr.  Vall^  received  an  order 
from  M.  Peyrez  to  deliver  them  to  him;  and  he  took  them  to  St. 
Louis  where  they  are  in  his  possession;  and  he  delivered  to  M. 
Dubreuil  the  covenant  which  they  had  signed  together;  and  that 
some  days  after,  he  came  down  with  two  negroes  to  make  the 
house-breaking  and  abduction  of  the  negress  who  remained  be- 
hind, even  as  the  deponent  has  deposed  in  the  beginning  of  the 
present  declaration. 

That,  since  such  a  deception  could  only  be  regarded  as  a 
manifest  theft  and  nocturnal  abduction  with  house-breaking 
and  manifest  fraud,  the  deponent  prayed  for  a  writ  against  the 
said  M.  Glamorgan  to  prosecute  him  by  criminal  action,  where 
he  may  be  found;  praying  to  this  end  that  there  be  delivered  to 
him  a  capias  for  his  apprehension  and  arrest  on  this  bank,  if  he 
can  be  discovered  here;  and  he  declares  under  the  oath  which  he 
has  made  that  his  present  deposition  is  sincere  and  true. 

[Signed]  • 

DuGharme.  Daniel  McEldufif. 

Pierre  Laperche.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Philippe  Engel.  Ant.  Girardin. 

And  the  same  day  in  virtue  of  the  declaration  hereabove  made 
by  M.  Daniel  McElduff  and  of  his  requisition  there  below,  com- 
mands and  orders  are  given  the  bailiff  or  huissier  of  this  depend- 
ency, or  others  whom  it  shall  concern  on  this  American  bank,  to 
apprehend  and  arrest  the  body  and  person  of  M.  Glamorgan  where- 
ever  he  can  be  found  in  this  land  and  American  dependency  that  he 
may  be  detained  a  prisoner  in  the  prison  of  this  Court,  or  of  others 
where  he  may  be  apprehended,  until  his  entire  vindication  and  a 
decree  thereof  by  justice  has  been  made.  Given  by  the  Court  the 
said  day  and  year.'  Ant.  Girardin. 


388  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  la  meme  cour. 

delivr^  une  Saisie  au  s^  pierre  laCoste  Centre  Chatelereau  pro- 
visoire  et  privilegie  avec  injonction  au  S"^  mailler  de  la  faire  Ekccu- 
ter  p^  la  s^  de  de  [sic]  douze  Cent  quatre  dix  livres  quatre  sols  en 
pelterie. 

La  Cour  est  ajourride  au  i^'"  juillet  prochain. 

A*  Girardin. 

du  lo  [?]  juin  delivrd  une  saisie  contre  pierre  Billet  a  la  requisi- 
tion de  piere  La  fleur  pour  saisir  un  Boeuf  ou  une  jeune  paire  de 
boeuf  quil  a  Echange  a  piere  martin. 

du  i8  juin  delivre  un  ordre  a  francois  harnoux  p^  faire  payer 
13  minots  de  bled  a  la  sucession  de  moore  p^  Les  frais  de  recolte 
adresse  a  M^  Biggs  Et  Bond  Executeurs  testamentaire. 

du  30  [sic]  juin  delivre  une  saisie  a  B^^  mercier  Entre  les  mains 
de  B*^  alary  sur  Charles  Bequet  p^  saisir  neuf  piastres  que  led^ 
alary  doit  a  bequet. 

du  23  juin  1789.  Delivre  une  Saisie  a  David  Waddel  pour 
saisir  conservatoirement  Et  privilegier™*  Les  Biens  mobiliairs  Et 
Effets  app^^  a  francois  Clark  tant  a  la  belle  fontaine  grand  Ruis- 
seau  que  autres  Endroits  de  ce  district,  ladite  saisie  portant  prise 
de  Corp  contre  led^  francois  Clark  pour  la  somme  de  six  Cent  vingt 
huit  livres  en  piastres  Echus  depuis  le  1®^  8^^^  1788  a  deffaud  par 
luy  de  payer  signee  led*  ordre  dantoine  girardin  Presidant. 

du  30  juin.  Delivre  une  ordre  dassignation  a  Isidore  savoy 
dit  Cadien  contre  m^  de  S*  pierre  curd  p^  paroitre  a  la  courdu  i^^ 
juillet. 

du  meme.  jour,  delivrd  un  ordre  dassignation  a  Gabriel  Baron 
Contre  pierre  martin  p^  paroitre  a  la  meme  cour. 

Evidently  a  later  insertion  after  the  follo^ving  entries  were  made. 


COURT  RECORD,  JUNE,  1789  389 

At  the  same  Court. 

Issued  a  writ  of  seizure  to  M.  Pierre  LaCoste  against  Chatele- 
reau,  provisional  and  privileged,  with  injunction  to  M.  Mailhet  to 
have  it  executed  for  the  sum  of  twelve  hundred  and  forty  livres  four 
sols  in  peltries. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  first  of  next  July. 

Ant.  Girardin. 

June  io[?],  issued  a  writ  of  seizure  against  Pierre  Billet  at 
the  requisition  of  Pierre  Lafleur  to  attach  an  ox  or  a  yoke  of 
young  oxen  which  he  exchanged  with  Pierre  Martin. 

June  18,  issued  a  summons  to  Frangois  Harnoux  to  compel 
the  estate  of  Moore  to  pay  13  minots  of  wheat  for  the  costs  of  the 
harvest,  addressed  to  MM.  Biggs  and  Bond,  testamentary 
executors. 

June  30  ^  issued  a  writ  of  seizure  to  Bte.  Mercier  into  the 
hands  of  Bte.  Alarie  on  Charles  Becquet  to  seize  nine  piastres 
which  the  said  Alarie  owes  Becquet. 

June  23,  1789,  issued  a  writ  of  seizure  to  David  Waddel  to 
seize  by  way  of  preservation  and  privilege  the  personal  goods 
and  effects  belonging  to  Francis  Clark  in  Bellefontaine, 
Grand  Ruisseau  and  other  places  of  this  district.  The  said  writ 
of  seizure  contains  a  capias  against  the  said  Francis  Clark  for 
the  sum  of  six  hundred  and  twenty-eight  livres  in  piastres^  due 
since  October  i,  1788;  given  for  default  of  payment  by  him  and 
the  said  writ  is  signed  by  Antoine  Girardin,  President. 

June  30,  issued  a  summons  on  complaint  of  Isidore  Savoy 
called  Cadien  against  M.  de  St.  Pierre  cure  that  he  appear  at 
the  Court  July  i. 

Same  day,  issued  a  summons  to  Gabriel  Baron  against  Pierre 
Martin  that  he  appear  at  the  same  Court. 


390  ILLINOIS.  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  line  Cour  du  l^^  juillet  1789. 
M'^  ant®  girardin  Presidant  B*®  Dubuque 

Philipe  angel  Louis  Chatel 

Charle  Ducharme  henry  Biron 

p'"®  Laperche 

M"^  Charles  cadron  demandeur  Centre  Maturin  Bouvet 
deffendeur 

Le  S""  Charles  cadron  Reclame  une  Cloche  Centre  le  S^  Bou- 
vet quil  dit  SEtre  Reserve  de  paroUe  verballe.  Et  comprise  dans 
ses  autres  meubles  quil  Sest  reserve  par  son  contrat  de  vente  con- 
senty  aud*  s^  Bouvet  Et  a  declare  quil  Setoit  reserve  Expresse- 
ment  la  Cloche  de  parole  verbale  avec  led*  s^  Bouvet. 

oui  led*  S^  Bouvet  quil  a  dit  que  le  s^  Cadron  lui  avoit  vendli 
la  Cloche  Et  quelle  faisoit  partie  du  fond  Etant  Clou^  Et  atach^e 
sur  deux  poteaux  En  terre  avec  des  planches  Clou^e  dessus 
les  poteaux  Et  quil  dit  faire  partie  du  terrain  comme  y  Etant 
atach^e  et  plante. 

Led*  S^  S*  pierre  [sic]  a  replique  que  quoy  que  la  Cloche  ne 
soit  pas  expressement  reserve  Sur  le  contract,  quil  Se  lest  reserve 
par  trois  fois  de  parole  verbale  avec  led*  s^  Bouvet. 

ce  que  led*  S^  Bouvet  a  desnie  et  a  soutenu  que  led*  s^  Cadron 
la  luy  avoit  vendue  ce  qui  a  Ete  Egalement  deni^  par  led*  s^ 
Cadron  qui  a  Soutenii  que  la  Cloche  lui  apartenoient. 

Vu  les  demandes  repliques  et  reponses  des  parties  la  Cour 
aprds  avoir  murement  delibere  que  la  Cloche  Etant  atachee  sur 
des  Poteau  plante  en  terre  Et  couverte  avec  des  planches,  fait 
partie  du  fond  Et  y  est  accessoire  Et  en  concequance  ne  pou- 
vant  S'oter  Sans  fracture  ny  ayant  dailleurs  aucune  Conven- 
tion particuliere  par  Ecrit  qui  prouve  que  led*  s'"  cadron  se  Lest 
reserve  particuHerement.  ladite  Cour  adjuge  la  Cloche  au 
fond  Comme  En  faisant  partie,  condamne  le  s^  Cadron  aux  frais 
de  la  sentence. 

M^  de  S*  pierre  cur6  de  cette  paroisse  a  present^  une  requete 
en  datte  de  cejourdhuy  Reclamant  des  madriers  apartenant  a 

^  A  large  bell  used  to  call  the  farm-hands  to  meals. 

'^  A  clerical  error      M  de  St.  Pierre  was  in  the  room  waiting  for  his  suit  to  be  called. 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1789  391 

At  a  Court,  July  i,  1789. 
MM.  Ant.  Girardin,  President.  Bte.  Dubuque 
PhDippe  Engel.  Louis  ChateL 

Charles  DuCharme.  Henry  Biron. 

Pierre  Laperche. 
M.  Charles  Cadron,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Maturin  Bouvet,  Defendant. 

M.  Charles  Cadron  claims  a  bell  from  M.  Bouvet  which  he  said 
he  had  reserved  by  verbal  agreement  and  included  with  the  other 
pieces  of  furniture  which  he  had  reserved  by  his  contract  of  sale 
entered  into  with  the  said  M.  Bouvet,  and  he  declared  that  he 
had  reserved  the  bell  expressly  by  verbal  agreement  with  the 
said  M.  Bouvet. 

Heard  the  said  M.  Bouvet  who  said  that  M.  Cadron  had  sold 
him  the  bell  and  that  it  was  part  of  the  grounds,  as  it  was  nailed 
and  attached  to  two  posts  set  in  the  earth  and  planks  were 
nailed  above  the  posts,  and  that  it  made  part  of  the  land  as  being 
attached  to  and  planted  therein  K 

The  said  M.  St.  Pierre  [M.  Cadron  ?]  ^  replied  that  although  the 
bell  was  not  expressly  reserved  in  the  contract,  that  he  reserved 
it  three  times  by  verbal  agreement  with  the  said  M.  Bouvet. 

This  the  said  M.  Bouvet  denied  and  maintained  that  the  said 
M.  Cadron  had  sold  it  to  him,  which  has  been  equally  denied  by 
the  said  M.  Cadron,  who  maintained  that  the  bell  belonged  to 
him. 

In  consideration  of  the  prayers,  replies  and  answers  of  the 
parties  and  after  having  maturely  considered  that  the  bell,  since  it 
was  attached  to  posts  set  in  the  ground  and  covered  with  planks, 
made  part  of  the  grounds  and  is  appurtenant  to  it  and  consequently 
could  not  be  taken  away  without  breaking,  and  that  besides  there 
was  no  specific  agreement  in  writing  which  proves  that  the 
said  M.  Cadron  reserved  it  particularly,  the  said  Court  adjudges 
the  bell  to  the  grounds  as  making  part  thereof  and  condemns 
M.  Cadron  to  pay  the  costs  of  the  judgment. 

M.  St.  Pierre,  cure  of  this  parish,  presented  a  petition  under 
date  of  to-day,  in  which  he  claims  some  joists  belonging  to  the 
church  of  Cahokia,  which  are  in  the  house  belonging  to  Pierre 


k 


392  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

L  Eglise  des  cahos  qui  sont  dans  la  maison  vendue  par  decret 
a  la  porte  de  leglise  saisie  en  vertu  de  Ihypoteque  que  deffunt  du- 
buque  avoit  sur  ladite  maison  app*®  a  pierre  martin,  dont  les  mar- 
guilier  ont  fait  leur  declaration  a  la  deux^  Cri^e  ladite  maison 
adjuge  a  M^  dumoulin  a  la  troisieme  Cn6e  pour  deux  cent  Cinq 
livres.  ladite  Cour  assemblee  ordonne  sur  ladite  requete  que 
les  madriers  Seront  payez  a  raison  de  trois  livres  la  piece  par  qui 
il  apartiendra  suivant  lestimation  qui  En  a  Ete  cy  devant  faite 
et  que  sil  ne  se  trouvoit  pas  la  quantity  que  martin  a  Emprunt^ 
dans  sa  maison  que  ce  qui  sen  manquera  sera  pay^  sur  le  prix 
de  Adjudication  de  la  maison. 

Isidore  savoye  dit  cadien  Contre  M^  S*  pierre  Curd 

Le  demandeur  Reclame  quatre  minots  de  pois  que  M'"  S^ 
pierre  lui  a  saisy  et  quil  a  laisse  aprds  la  saisie  laissd  pourir  dans 
lendroit  saisy,  lesdits  pois  a  raison  de  lo^^  le  minot  font  40^^  ladite 
Saisie  ayant  ete  faite  p^  14^^  que  led^  savoye  off  re  de  diminuer 
sur  les  40^^.  oui  M^  S^  pierre  par  M^  philipe  angel  qui  a  dit  que 
led*  demandeur  ne  sEtoit  pas  arange  avant  son  depart  p^  Les 
petites  cotes,  parties  ouis  la  Cour  a  condamne  M^  S*  pierre  a 
payer  aud*  saye  [sic]  demandeur  la  somme  de  vingt  six  livres  p^ 
lexedant  de  la  perte  des  pois  Et  aux  frais  liquidez  a  15^^. 

A*  Girardin 

Le  S^  Labuxiere  a  represent^  quil  avoit  fait  toutes  Ses  dili- 
gences p^  le  recouvrement  de  la  sucession  de  deffunt  dubuque 
Et  meme  fait  son  protest  a  la  porte  de  lEglise  dont  la  Cour  a  Con- 
noissance.  En  concequance  il  luy  sera  tenu  compte  de  Son 
recouvrence  et  tant  des  Billets  quil  naura  pu  recouvrer  que  de 
ceux  quil  a  recouvre  a  dix  p^  Cent  En  fais[an]t  par  luy  aux 
debiteurs  une  simple  sommation  de  payer  par  Ihuissiei*. 

du  5  juillet.  delivre  une  saisie  et  arret  a  francois  Chevalier 
Contre  antoine  lamarche  jusqua  ce  quil  se  soit  arange  Entreux. 

^  St.  Charles,  in  Missouri. 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1789  393 

Martin,  that  was  sold  by  decree  at  the  door  of  the  church,  after 
being  seized  by  virtue  of  the  mortgage  which  the  deceased  Du- 
buque had  on  the  said  house;  concerning  which  joists  the  church 
wardens  made  their  affidavit  at  the  second  crying  of  the  auction, 
and  the  said  house  was  adjudged  at  the  third  crying  to  M.  Du- 
moulin  for  two  hundred  and  five  livres.  The  said  Court  assem- 
bled decrees  concerning  the  said  petition  that  the  joists  shall  be 
paid  for  at  the  rate  of  three  livres  the  piece  by  whomsoever  it 
shall  concern  in  accordance  with  the  appraisement  which  has 
herebefore  been  made  of  them;  and  that,  if  there  should  not  be 
found  in  the  house  the  quantity  that  Martin  borrowed,  what 
is  lacking  shall  be  paid  for  out  of  the  price  of  the  auction  sale  of 
the  house. 

Isidore  Savoy  called  Cadien  vs.  M.  St.  Pierre,  cur^. 

The  plaintiff  claims  four  minots  of  peas  which  M.  St.  Pierre 
seized  and  which  he  allowed  to  rot  in  the  place  where  they  were 
seized.  The  said  peas  at  the  rate  of  10  livres  the  minot  amount  to 
40  livres  and  the  said  seizure  was  made  for  14  livres,  which  the 
said  Savoy  offers  to  deduct  from  the  40  livres.  .  Heard  M.  St. 
Pierre,  represented  by  Philippe  Engel,  who  said  that  the  said 
plaintiff  had  not  made  arrangements  before  his  departure  for  the 
Little  Bluffs.^  Parties  heard,  the  Court  condemned  M.  St. 
Pierre  to  pay  to  the  said  Savoy,  the  plaintiff,  the  sum  of  twenty- 
six  livres  for  the  excess  of  the  loss  of  the  peas  and  to  pay  the 
costs,  set  at  15  livres.  Ant.  Girardin. 

M.  Labuxiere  set  forth  that  he  had  made  all  diligence  possible 
in  the  collection  of  the  debts  due  the  estate  of  the  deceased  Du- 
buque and  had  even  made  his  protest  at  the  door  of  the  church,  of 
which  the  Court  has  knowledge.  Consequently  there  shall  be 
allowed  him  for  all  his  labor  of  collecting  the  notes,  both  for 
those  on  which  nothing  has  been  paid  and  for  those  which  he  has 
collected,  ten  percent,  after  he  has  made  a  simple  summons  to 
pay  through  the  huissier. 

July  5,  issued  a  writ  of  seizure  and  arrest  to  Francois  Chevalier 
against  Antoine  Lamarche  to  be  in  force  until  arrangements  are 
made  between  them. 


394  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

A  une  Cour  tenue  Extraordinairement  le  14  juillet  1789 
'   tenue  par 

M^^  ant®  girardin  presidant       Louis  chatel 

jean  B*®  dubuque  henry  Biron 

Charle  ducharme  pierre  Laperche 

Philipe  angel 
Entre   IzrooRE   savoye   et  Catherine  Pencrasse  sa  femme 

plignant  demandeurs  Contre  jean  B*®  LaBecasse  acus^ 
detenu  aux  fers  au  deffau  de  prison  deffendeur 
Ladite  Catherine  pencrasse  accuse  ledit  jean  B*"^  LaBecasse 
davoir  et^  ches  Elle  luy  demander  si  elle  vouloit  venir  avec  Sa 
femme  p^  Ramasser  des  mures  Et  quelle  luyavoit  Repondti  que 
ouy,  quil  lavoit  prise  En  croup  deriere  luy  et  quil  avoit  passe  le 
pont  de  la  prairie  du  pont  et  avoit  suiyy  le  vieux  Chemain  des 
clostures  et  quetant  dans  le  Chemain  ledit  la  Becasse  avoit  fourche 
un  petit  sautier  dans  le  Bois,  quelle  luy  avoit  dit  ou  me  mene  tu 
ce  nest  pas  la  le  Chemain  quil  luy  avoit  dit  alors  Etant  avance 
dans  le  Bois  descend,  il  faut  que  je  jouisse  de  toy.  qualors  Elle 
avoit  dit  que  cela  ne  seroit  pas  Et  quelle  ny  Consenteroit  pas. 
quetant  descendue  de  Cheval  led^  La  Bacasse  lavoit  prise  et  la- 
voit jetee  par  terre  malgre  les  Cris  quelle  jetoit  Et  malgre  toute  sa 
resistance  et  quil  en  avoit  joui  Et  lavoit  violee  nayant  pas  asez 
de  force  p'*  soposer  a  son  Entreprise  Et  quil  luy  avoit  meme  meur- 
tri  un  Sain  ou  elle  avoit  deja  mal  quil  lui  avoit  Ensuite  demande 
si  elle  vouloit  quil  la  ramene  au  village,  quelle  ne  sy  etoit  pas 
oposde  parce  quelle  se  trouvoit  dans  le  bois  et  quil  lavoit  Ramenee 
jusques  au  pont  ou  elle  avoit  descendu  de  deriere  luy  et  quil  la- 
voit quittee  a  cet  Endroit  dans  un  Etat  de  la  plus  grande  afflic- 
tion. 

(Oui  aussi  led*  Labecasse  qui  est  conventi  avoir  Ete  Chercher 
ladite  Catherine  pencrosse  ch^selle  p^  aler  aux  mures  et  quil  convient 
luy  avoir  fait  la  proposition  En  Chemain  mais  quil  ne  lavoir  point 
touchee  ni  forcee  Et  quil  convient  avoit  tor  de  luy  avoir  fait  cette 
proposition  quil  etoit  pris  de  Boisson  Et  que  ladite  pencrasse 
nacuse  pas  la  verity  lors  quelle  dit  quil  la  forcee,  que  voyant 
quelle  ne  vouloit  pas  consentir  il  lavoit  Ramen^  au  pont  ou  il 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1789  395 

At  a  Court  meeting  in  special  session,  July  14,  1789,  held  by 

MM.  Ant.  Girardin,  President.    Louis  Chatel. 

Jean  Bte.  Dubuque.  Henry  Biron. 

Charles  DuCharme.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Philippe  Engel. 
Isidore  Savoy  and  Catherine  Pencrasse,  on  complaint  of 
his  wife,  Plaintiffs,  vs.  Jean  Bte.  Labecasse  accused 

and  held  in  irons  for  lack  of  prison,  defendant. 
The  said  Catherine  Pencrasse  accuses  the  said  Jean  Bte. 
Labecasse  of  coming  to  her  house  to  ask  her  if  she  wished  to 
come  with  his  wife  to  gather  mulberries  and  that  she  had  answered, 
"yes;"  and  that  he  had  taken  her  behind  him  on  the  croup  and 
that  he  had  passed  the  bridge  of  the  Prairie  du  Pont  and  had 
followed  the  old  road  of  the  enclosures,  and  that  being  in  the 
road  the  said  Labecasse  had  turned  ofif  on  a  little  path  in  the 
woods;  and  that  she  had  said  to  him:  ''Where  are  you  taking 
me?  This  is  not  the  road;"  that  he  had  said,  after  having  ad- 
vanced into  the  woods:  "Get  down!  I  must  enjoy  you;"  that, 
when  she  had  said  that  this  should  not  be  and  that  she  would 
not  consent  thereto,  he,  having  dismounted,  had  taken  her  and 
thrown  her  on  the  ground  in  spite  of  the  cries  which  she  uttered 
and  in  spite  of  all  her  resistance,  and  that  he  had  enjoyed  her  and 
had  violated  her,  since  she  did  not  have  enough  strength  to  oppose 
his  undertaking;  and  that  he  had  even  bruised  one  of  her  breasts 
which  was  already  sore;  that  he  had  afterwards  asked  if  she 
wished  him  to  ^take  her  to  the  village  and  that  she  had  made  no 
opposition  because  she  was  in  the  woods;  and  that  he  had  brought 
her  back  to  the  bridge,  where  she  had  dismounted  from  behind 
him;  and  that  he  had  left  her  in  that  place  in  a  condition  of 
greatest  affliction. 

Heard  also  the  said  Labecasse  who  acknowledges  that  he  had 
sought  out  the  said  Catherine  Pencrasse  at  her  house  to  go  for 
mulberries;  and  he  acknowledges  that  he  had  made  the  proposal 
to  her  on  the  road,  but  he  says  he  did  not  lay  his  hands  on  her 
or  force  her;  and  he  acknowledges  that  he  was  in  the  wrong  in 
having  made  the  proposal  to  her  and  that  he  had  been  drinking; 


396  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

lavoit  quitt^e.     qui  est  tout  ce  quils  ont  dit  pour  leurs  demandes 
et  deffences. 

Le  tout  examine  Et  consider^  la  Cour  ayant  En  connoissance 
que  ladite  Catherine  pencrasse  setoit  deja  exposee  il  y  a  deux  ans 
a  Etre  forcde  par  ledit  Labecasse  par  le  recit  qui  en  a  Ete  fait  au 
presidant  de  la  cour  Et  Setant  de  Nouveau  exposee  volontaire- 
ment  aux  Entreprises  dud*  Labecasse  p^  avoir  accepte  la  partie 
de  mures  quil  luy  a  propose  Et  ayant  dans  le  Bois  remont^  deriere 
led*  labecasse  p^  sen  revenir  au  village  apres  le  pretend\i  viol 
quelle  dit  avoir  Etd  commis  En  sa  personne.  ce  qui  paroit  a  la 
Cour  quelle  na  pas  Evit^  ny  Eloigne  le  danger  dont  EUe  se  plaint 
au  Contraire  quelle  y  a  donn^  occasion.  La  Cour  par  Delibera- 
tion a  mis  les  parties  hor  de  Cour  Et  de  proces  a  ce  sujet  Et  leur 
impose  silance  pour  le  pretendu  viol,  deffend  aud*  Labecasse 
d'atenter  a  lavenir  sur  la  Chastete  de  ladite  pencrasse  et  le  Con- 
damne  a  rester  deux  fois  vingt  quatre  heures  au  fers  a  la  garde 
du  bailly  de  La  Cour  ou  il  Sera  noury  au  pain  et  a  leau  a 
commencer  de  ce  jour  heure  presente  En  joint  au  bailly  dy 
tenir  la  main  Et  que  la  presente  punition  soit  observe  Et  ce 
a  cause  de  latentat  que  led*  Labecasse  a  forme  contre  la  vertu 
de  ladite  pencrasse.  Condamme  ladite  Cour  les  parties  En 
Chacun  la  moiti^  des  frais  de  Lextraordinaire  ce  qui  sera 
Execute. 
[Signed] 

DuCharme  Philipe  Engel 

sa  B*^  Dubuque 

Louis  +  Chatel  hBi 

marque  pierre  Laperche 

Labuxiere  grefier  A*  Girardin. 

Sur  les  representations  faite  a  la  Cour  par  M^  francois  trotier 
commandant  de  ce  poste  des  propos  inconcidere  tenus  publique- 
ment  par  M^  francois  saucier  dans  la  Boisson,  ou  il  a  manque  a 
plusieurs  personnes  En  leur  offrant  les  armes  avec  des  termes 
impropres  et  refusant  dobejir  a  la  garde  qui  avoit  ordre  de  Lar- 
reter  et  avoir  Cause  du  scandale  la  Cour  ordonne  que  led*  s^ 
saucier  tiendra  prison  vingt  quatre  heures  Et  le  Condamme  en 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1789  397 

and  he  says  that  the  said  Pencrasse  does  not  speak  the  truth, 
when  she  says  that  he  forced  her;  that  when  he  saw  that  she  was 
unwilling  to  consent,  he  had  brought  her  back  to  the  bridge  where 
he  had  left  her.  This  is  all  that  they  have  said  in  regard  to  their 
prayers  and  defences. 

All  examined  and  considered  the  Court  knowing,  from  a  recital 
which  has  been  made  to  the  president  of  the  Court  that  the  said 
Catherine  Pencrasse  has  once  before,  two  years  ago,  exposed  herself 
to  being  forced  by  the  said  Labecasse  and  that  she  again  vol- 
untarily exposed  herself  to  the  undertaking  of  the  said  Labecasse 
by  having  accepted  the  invitation  to  go  berrying,  which  he  proposed 
to  her,  and  that  in  the  woods  she  remounted  behind  the  said 
Labecasse  to  return  to  the  village  after  the  pretended  violation, 
which  she  says  had  been  committed  on  her  person,  is  of  the  opin- 
ion that  she  has  not  avoided  nor  kept  out  of  the  way  of  the 
danger  of  which  she  complains,  but  that  on  the  contrary  she  gave 
occasion  to  it.  The  Court  by  decree  non-suits  the  parties  and 
imposes  silence  in  regard  to  the  pretended  violation,  and  forbids 
the  said  Labecasse  to  make  an  attempt  on  the  chastity  of  the 
said  Pencrasse  in  the  future  and  sentences  him  to  remain  two 
times  twenty-four  hours  in  irons  in  the  custody  of  the  bailiff  of  the 
Court,  where  he  shall  be  fed  on  bread  and  water  commencing  from 
this  day,  the  present  hour,  and  commands  the  bailiff  to  see  to  it  that 
the  present  punishment  be  observed  and  this  because  of  the  attempt 
which  the  said  Labecasse  made  on  the  virtue  of  the  said  Pencrasse. 
The  said  Court  condemns  each  of  the  parties  to  pay  half  of  the 
costs  of  the  special  session  for  which  there  will  be  execution. 

[Signed] 
DuCharme.  Bte.  Dubuque 

Philippe  Engel.  hBi 

His  Pierre  Laperche. 

Louis  4-  Chatel  Ant.  Girardin. 

mark 

Labuxiere,  Clerk. 

On  the  representation  made  to  the  Court  by  M.  Francois 
Trottier,  commandant  of  this  post,  of  the  thoughtless  talk  made 


398  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

• 

six  piastres  damande  p^  Leglise  ce  qui  sera  execute,     le  con- 
damne  aux  frais 
[Signed] 

DuCharme  Pierre  Laperche 

Philipe  Engel  B^^^  Dubuque 

sa  hBi 

Louis  +  Chatel  A*  Girardin. 

marque 
Labuxiere  N^® 

a  une  autre  cour  extraordinaire  du  meme  jour. 
Entre    Louis    Coste     demandeur  Contre    Ignace    Chatigny 

deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  se  plain  contre  led*  ignace  Chatigny  de  ce  quil 
luy  a  pris  un  Boeuf  dans  la  Commune  et  quil  la  donne  au  s^ 
bausoleil  p^  le  tuer  au  moyen  dun  quartier  quil  sest  reserve  luy 
disant  quil  le  lui  abandonne  comme  layant  gagne  au  jeu.  que 
luy  Coste  a  dit  a  Chatigny  quil  ne  luy  donneroit  pas  de  Boeuf 
mais  quil  aloit  le  payer  ce  que  led*  Chatigny  avoit  accepte,  que 
malgre  leur  Convention  led*  s'"  Chatigny  lavoit  fait  prendre  et 
lavoit  fait  tuer  aujourdhuy  Sans  ordre  ny  Consentement  dud* 
demandeur  au  prejudice  de  leur  Conventions. 

oui  led*  Chatigny  qui  reconnu  quil  Etoit  Convenu  avec  led* 
Coste  de  recevoir  le  billet  dud*  Coste  En  payement,  mais  quay- 
ant  tarde  a  luy  remetre  le  Billet  Et  ayant  refuse  a  francois  lapen- 
see  de  livrer  le  billet  il  avoit  dit  a  Beausoleil  de  Sen  aranger  pourvii 
quil  luy  en  donne  un  quartier. 

Le  demandeur  a  replique  quil  avoit  gagne  ce  Boeuf  aud* 
Beausoleil,  que  led*  Beausoleil  le  luy  avoit  livre.  Et  que  le  s^ 
Chatigny  ne  devoit  pas  en  disposer  ny  Se  payer  par  Ses  mains, 
apr^s  Etre  Convent  de  Saranger  Entreux  Et  de  Recevoir  le  Bil- 
let du  demandeur. 

led*  Chatigny  a  demande  la  deposition  de  francois  lapens^e 
qui  a  linstant  est  Conparii  apres  sermant  par  luy  fait  de  dire  la 
verite  a  dit  qutant  [sic]  present  au  jeu  des  parties.  Et  quapres  que 
led*  Coste  a  En  perdu  le  Boeuf  quil  a  dit  a  Chatigny  le  Boeuf  est  a 
vous  il  vous  apartient  Et  que  le  s^  alary  sy  Etant  trouve  luy  dit 


/*;r<-  • 


(f/?.  t ^.7^  ^^«^  ccJ^utfC.  ^  ct/l^i/  4'/^t,< ,y^fr. 
L 


^v--* 


/         /  /^ 


Facsimile  of  a  Page  from  the  Record  of  the  Cahokia  Court, 
Joseph  Labuxiere,  Clerk. 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1789  399 

publicly  by  M.  Francois  Saucier  while  under  the  influence  of 
drink,  wherein  he  insulted  several  persons  by  challenging  them 
and  using  improper  expressions,  and  of  his  refusal  to  obey  the 
guard  who  had  an  order  to  arrest  him  and  of  having  been  the 
occasion  of  scandal;  the  Court  decrees  that  the  said  M.  Saucier 
shall  be  confined  in  prison  for  twenty-four  hours  and  condemns 
him  in  six  piastres  fine  to  the  church  for  which  there  will  be 
execution.  Condemned  him  to  pay  the  costs. 
[Signed] 
DuCharme.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Philippe  Engel.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

His  H  B  i 

Louis  +  Chatel.  Ant.  Girardin. 

mark  Labuxiere,  Notary. 

At  another  Court  in  special  session  of  the  same  day. 
Louis  Coste,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Ignance  Chatigny,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  brings  complaint  against  the  said  Ignance  Chati- 
gny that  he  took  an  ox  of  his  in  the  commons  and  gave  it  to  M, 
Beausoleil  to  slaughter  on  condition  of  a  quarter  being  reserved 
for  himself,  and  he  said  to  the  plaintiff  that  he  had  lost  it  to  him, 
since  he  (Chatigny)  won  it  at  play;  that  he,  Coste,  said  to 
Chatigny  that  he  would  not  give  him  any  ox,  but  that  he  was 
going  to  pay  him  and  this  the  said  Chatigny  had  accepted;  that 
in  spite  of  their  agreement  the  said  M.  Chatigny  had  had  it 
taken  and  slaughtered  to-day  without  order  or  consent  of  the 
said  plaintiff  and  contrary  to  their  agreement. 

Heard  the  said  Chatigny  who  acknowledged  that  he  had  agreed 
with  the  said  Coste  to  receive  the  note  of  the  said  Coste  in  pay- 
ment; but,  since  he  had  delayed  remitting  the  note  and  had 
refused  to  deliver  the  note  to  Franfois  Lapance,  he  had  said  to 
Beausoleil  to  make  his  arrangements  about  it,  on  condition  that 
he  gave  him  a  quarter  thereof. 

The  plaintiff  replied  that  he  had  won  this  ox  from  the  said 
Beausoleil  and  that  the  said  Beausoleil  had  delivered  it  to  him; 
and  that  M.  Chatigny  ought  not  to  have  disposed  of  it  nor  have 
paid  himself  by  his  own  hands,  after  having  agreed  to  make 


400  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  coste  si  vous  ne  jugez  pas  propos  de  venir  le  livrer  je  le  Connois 
je  vous  le  montreray. 

Le  S'"  B*^  alary  est  comparii  apres  sermant  par  luy  fait  de  dire 
la  verite.  a  dit  quil  avoit  offert  de  montrer  le  Boeuf  a  Chatigny  par- 
ce  quil  le  Connoissoit,  Mais  que  Coste  Navoit  Rien  repondu, 
quil  avoit  Seulement  dit  Nous  verrons, 

parties  ouis  avec  les  temoins  la  Cour  Condamne  le  s'^  Chatigny 
a  rendre  ou  payer  un  pareil  Boeuf  aud*  Louis  Coste  sans  delais  Et 
Ennule  le  jeu  Entreux  condamnons  En  outre  led*  Chatigny  aux 
frais  de  Lextraord^^  ce  qui  sera  execute,  les  quels  frais  montant 
a  deux  cent  trente  Cinq  livres  seront  payez  aud*  Coste  par  led* 
Chatigny  Sans  delais. 
[Signed] 
Philipe  Engel  DuCharme 

Pierre  Laperche  hBi 

sa  B*^  Dubuque 

Louis  +  Chatel  A*  Girardin. 

marque 

29  juillet  La  Cour  est  ajourn^e  au  i®^  aoust  1789. 
Delivre   un   ordre   d'assignation   a   francois   harnoux   contre 

michel  peltier  dit  antaya  p^  paroitre  a  la  Cour  du  i^^  aoust  pro- 
chain. 

30  juillet  delivre  a  M^  jean  dumoulin  une  saisie  provisoire  et 
Conservatoire  des  sucres  Effets  pelterie,  Creances  et  debtes  que 
le  s^  Jean  B*®  dubuque  a  Entre  Ses  mains  appartenants  au  S^ 
LaCoste  actuellement  a  la  riviere  des  ilinois  avec  deffences  de 
Sen  dessaisir  quil  nen  soit  par  la  Cour  ordonn^. 

J"^  Dumoulin. 
7  aout  delivrd  un  ordre  a  M^  aRondel  Contre  Louis  Coste. 

1  No  reason  known  for  the  heavy  costs. 


COURT  RECORD,  JULY,  1789        ,  401 

arrangements  with  him  and  to  receive  the  note  from  the  plaintiff. 

The  said  Chatigny  demanded  the  deposition  of  Francois  La- 
panc^,  who  now  appeared  and  after  oath  had  been  made  by  him 
to  tell  the  truth,  said  that  he  was  present  at  the  game  between 
the  parties,  and  that,  after  the  said  Coste  lost  the  ox,  he  said 
to  Chatigny,  "The  ox  is  yours,  it  belongs  to  you,"  and  that  M. 
Alarie  who  was  present  said  to  Coste:  "If  you  do  not  judge  it 
fitting  to  come  to  deliver  it,  I  know  it  and  will  show  it  to  you." 

M.  Bte.  Alarie  appeared  and  after  oath  was  made  by  him  to 
tell  the  truth,  said  that  he  had  offered  to  show  the  ox  to  Chatigny, 
because  he  knew  it;  but  that  Coste  had  answered  nothing,  that 
he  had  only  said,  "We  will  see." 

After  the  parties  and  the  witnesses  were  heard,  the  Court  con- 
demns M.  Chatigny  to  render,  or  pay  for,  a  similar  ox  to  the  said 
Louis  Coste  without  delay  and  annuls  the  play  between  them. 
We  condemn  furthermore  the  said  Chatigny  to  pay  the  costs  of 
the  special  session,  for  which  there  will  be  execution.  These 
costs  amount  to  two  hundred  and  thirty  five  livres  and  shall  be 
paid  to  the  said  Coste  by  the  said  Chatigny  without  delay.  ^ 

[Signed] 
Philippe  Engel.  DuCharme. 

Pierre  Laperche.  hBi 

His  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Louis  +  Chatel  Ant.  Girardin. 

mark 

July  29,  the  Court  adjourned  to  August  i,  1789. 

Issued  a  summons  to  Francois  Harnoux  against  Michel  Pelle- 
tier  called  Antaya  that  he  appear  at  the  Court  of  the  first  of  next 
August. 

July  30,  issued  to  M.  Jean  Dumoulin  a  provisional  and  con- 
servative seizure  of  the  sugar,  effects,  peltries,  claims  and  debts, 
which  M.  Jean  Bte.  Dubuque  has  in  his  possession,  belonging  to 
M.  LaCoste  at  present  at  the  Illinois  river,  with  prohibition  to 
divest  himself  thereof  except  he  be  ordered  thereto  by  the  Court. 

Jn.  Dumoulin. 
August  7.    Issued  a  summons  to  M.  Arundel  for  Louis  Coste. 


402  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  line  Cour  du  8  aoust  1789. 
M?"^  antoine  girardin  Philipe  angel 

B*^  dubuque  Louis  chatel 

Charles  ducharme  henry  Biron 

Le  S'  William  aRundel  demandeur  Contre  Louis  Coste 
deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  demande  au  defifendeur  la  livraison  de  Six 
milliers  de  farine  quil  luy  doit  par  Ses  Billets  Echus  ne  pouvant 
atendre  plus  long  terme  a  cause  de  Son  Voyage  de  misilimakinac 
Et  quil  soit  Condamn^  aux  frais. 

Qui  le  deffendeur  quil  a  reconnti  Ses  Billets  Et  devoir  ladite 
quantite  de  farine  et  a  dit  p^  deffences  quil  offroit  de  payer  mais 
quil  avoit  Besoin  de  quelques  jours  de  delais  pour  pouvoir  faire 
batre  son  Bled,  le  faire  moudre  et  faire  payer  ceux  qui  lui  doivent, 
quil  requeroit  un  delais  sufl&sant.  qua  bout  du  terme  que  le  s'" 
arondel  pouroit  luy  accorder  ainsy  que  la  Cour  il  prometoit  de 
payer  En  Entier. 

Vu  par  la  Cour  les  Billets  dud*  Coste  Echus.  Et  les  recoltes 
que  Ion  vient  de  finir. 

La  Cour  du  confeentement  dud*  s'^  arondel  a  accord^  aud* 
Coste  le  reste  de  ce  present  mois  daoust  pour  payer  les  six 
milliers  de  farine  aud*  s^  aRundel  p^  tous  delais,  faute  de  quoy 
Et  led*  tems  passe  le  condamnons  a  payer  Sans  delais  a  quoy 
faire  il  sera  Contraint  par  saisie  Et  vente  de  Ses  Biens  le  Con- 
damnons aux  frais  et  depens. 

Le  S^  Grassiot  Negociant  de  la  Rive  espagnole  Est  intervenii 
pour  la  dame  veuve  Groot  lequel  a  demande  quil  soit  surcit 
toutes  poursuittes  ny  quil  soit  donne  aucunnes  Saisies  Et  Rendii 
aucunnes  sentences  Contre  la  Succession  dud*  deffunt  groot  son 
Mary  quelle  n'ait  pris  Connoissances  des  Creances  de  ladite  suc- 
esion  Et  des  Biens  dicelle  afin  de  pouvoir  Se  metre  En  Etat  de 
payer  un  Chacun  Si  la  Sucession  Suffit. 

Sur  quoy  la  Cour  a  accorde  au  s'"  grassiot  p^  ladite  veuve  dicy 
au  mois  de  Novembre  prochain  p^  tout  delais  pour  prendre  les 
Connoissances  Requises.  Se  reservant  ladite  Cour  le  droit  et 
privilege  darreter  et  Saisir  Lesdits  Biens  qui  sont  sur  Son  district 


COURT  RECORD,  AUGUST,  1789  403 

At  a  Court,  August  8,  1789. 
MM.  Antine  Girardin.  Philippe  Engel. 

Bte.  Dubuque.  Louis  Chatel. 

Charles  Ducharme  Henry  Biron. 

M.  William  Arundel,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Louis  Coste,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  demands  of  the  defendant  the  delivery  of  six 
thousand  pounds  of  flour,  which  he  owes  him  according  to  his 
matured  notes,  and  for  which  the  plaintiff  cannot  wait  longer 
because  of  his  journey  to  Michillimakinac;  and  prays  that  the 
defendant  be  condemned  to  the  costs. 

Heard  the  defendant  who  said  that  he  acknowledged  his 
notes  and  that  he  owed  the  said  quantity  of  flour,  and  said  for 
defence  that  he  offered  to  pay,  but  that  he  needed  some  days 
delay  in  order  to  have  his  wheat  thrashed  and  ground,  and  to 
make  those  pay  who  owed  him,  and  that  he  prayed  for  a  sufficient 
delay;  that,  at  the  end  of  the  time  which  M.  Arundel  and  the  Court 
could  grant  him,  he  promised  to  pay  in  full. 

The  Court  having  seen  the  matured  notes  of  the  said  Coste 
and  the  crops,  the  harvesting  of  which  has  just  been  finished,  with 
the  consent  of  the  said  M.  Arundel,  granted  the  said  Coste  the 
balance  of  this  present  month  of  August  to  pay  the  six  thousand 
pounds  of  flour  to  the  said  M.  Arundel  and  no  longer;  in  default 
of  which  after  the  said  time  is  passed,  we  condemn  him  to  pay 
without  delay,  to  do  which  he  shall  be  constrained  by  seizure  and 
sale  of  goods.    We  condemn  him  to  pay  the  costs  and  charges. 

M.  Gratiot,  merchant  from  the  Spanish  bank,  intervened  for 
Madame  Groot,  widow,  and  prayed  that  there  be  stayed  all  suits 
and  that  there  should  not  be  given  any  seizures  nor  rendered  any 
judgments  against  the  estate  of  the  said  deceased  Groot,  her 
husband,  until  she  has  informed  herself  of  the  assets  of  the  said 
estate  and  of  the  goods  thereof  in  order  to  be  in  a  position  to  pay 
each  creditor,  if  the  estate  sufficed. 

Whereupon  the  Court  granted  M.  Gratiot  for  the  said  widow 
from  now  to  the  month  of  November  next  and  no  longer  in  order 
to  obtain  the  requisite  knowledge;  and  the  said  Court  reserves 
to  itself  the  right  and  privilege  to  attach  and  seize  the  said  goods 


404  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS      . 

qui  ne  pouront  ^tre  transferez  Sur  lautre  Rive  sans  quau  prealable 
Et  avant  toute  Choses  les  Creanciers  de  ce  District  ne  soient 
Entierm*  payez  et  Satisfait  de  ce  qui  poura  leur  Etre  dub.  Et 
En  Cas  de  refus  de  payement  lesd*  Biens  etre  vendus  jusques  a 
parfaite  liquidation  Par  deliberation. 

A*  Girardin. 

Sur  les  contestations  Entre  Pierre  troge  Et  Jacques  Piquet 
pour  une  petite  fiUe  remise  par  la  dame  piquet  a  la  dame  troge. 
Et  que  ladite  femme  piquet  Reclame  La  Cour  a  decidd  que  la 
dame  troge  Rendra  lenfant  a  la  femme  piquet  Sa  mere,  Sous  les 
conditions  que  piquet  ou  sa  femme  payeront  a  la  dame  troge  sa 
penssions  Entretiens  Soins  et  peines  quelle  a  pris  depuis  quelle 
la  et  du  jour  que  ladite  piquet  la  luy  a  remise  sur  le  compte  que 
produira  le  s^  troge  ou  sa  femme  qui  sera  taxe  par  deux  arbitres 
qui  nommeront  un  troisieme  En  Cas  de  Contestations  Entreux, 
Et  le  reliquat  de  compte  paye  comptant  aud^  troge  par  led*  piquet 
et  sa  femme  avant  d'Enlever  L'enfant  ordonnons  aud*  piquet  dy 
satisfaire  sans  delais. 

La  Cour  est  adjourn^e  au  i^^  de  7^^^  prochain. 

A*  Girardin. 

7  Aout  delivre  un  ordre  a  francois  Clark  contre  david  Wad  dell 
p^  paroitre  a  la  cour  du  i^^  7^^^  avec  deffences  de  metre  la  saisie 
quil  a  obtenu  contre  led*  Clark  a  execution,  non  plus  que  de  trans- 
porter les  Billets  dud*  Clark  a  peine  de  nulite  des  transports. 

10  aoust  delivre  un  ordre  a  Benjamain  B'ayram  Contre  david 
Waddel  p^  paroitre  a  la  Cour  prochain  du  i^^  7^^^. 

15  aoust  Delivre  un  ordre  de  Saisie  au  S^  Bouvet  Contre  le 
Nomme  Buyat  p^  saisir  Entre  Les  mains  de  piere  troge  le  bled  ou 
autre  Effets  quil  peut  avoir  Entre  ses  mains  app*  aud*  Buyat  p^ 
surete  de  la  somme  de  Cinquante  sept  livres  quil  doit  aud*  S^  Bou- 
vet. avec  deffences  de  Sen  dessaisir  a  peine  dEn  repondre  la  dite 
saisie  donne  par  jean  B*^  dubuque  magistra  a  bas  du  compte  dud* 
S^  Bouvet. 

N  Bouvet. 

du  5  7^^"^  delivr^  un  ordre  a  Charles  quil  [sic]  habitant  de  la 
prairie  du  pont  Contre  Nicolas  schemitz  du  grand  Ruisseau  p^ 
paroitre  a  la  Cour  de  mardy  prochain  8  de  ce  mois. 


COURT  RECORD,  AUGUST,  1789        405 

which  are  in  this  district,  which  goods  may  not  be  transferred  to 
the  other  bank  until  first  of  all  the  creditors  of  this  district  be 
paid  in  full,  and  satisfaction  made  for  that  which  may  be  due 
them;  and  in  case  of  refusal  of  payment  the  said  goods  are  to  be 
sold  up  to  perfect  liquidation.     By  resolution. 

Ant.  Girardin. 

In  regard  to  the  dispute  between  Pierre  Troge  and  James 
Piggott  over  a  little  girl  confided  by  Madame  Piggott  to  Madame 
Troge  and  whom  the  said  woman  Piggott  reclaims,  the  Court 
decided  that  Madame  Troge  shall  return  the  child  to  the  woman 
Piggott,  her  mother,  under  the  condition  that  Piggott  or  his  wife 
shall  pay  Madame  Troge  for  the  board,  maintenance,  care  and 
trouble,  which  she  has  given,  since  she  has  had  her  and  from  the 
day  that  the  said  Piggott  confided  her  to  her  care,  according  to 
the  account,  which  the  said  Troge  or  his  wife  shall  bring  and 
which  shall  be  estimated  by  two  arbitrators  who  shall  name  a  third 
in  case  of  disagreement  between  them;  and  the  balance  of  the 
account  shall  be  paid  in  cash  to  the  said  Troge  by  the  said  Pig- 
gott and  his  wife  before  taking  the  child  away.  We  command 
the  said  Piggott  to  satisfy  it  without  delay. 

The  Coiurt  adjourned  to  the  first  of  September  next. 

Ant.  Girardin. 

August  7.  Issued  a  summons  to  Francis  Clark  against  David 
Waddell  that  he  appear  at  the  Court  of  September  ist,  with 
prohibition  to  put  into  execution  the  seizure,  which  he  obtained 
against  Clark,  or  to  assign  the  notes  of  the  said  Clark  on  penalty 
of  nullity  of  the  assignments. 

August  10.  Issued  a  summons  to  Benjamin  Byram  against 
David  Waddell  that  he  appear  at  the  next  Court  of  September  i. 

August  25.  Issued  a  writ  of  seiziure  to  M.  Bouvet  against 
the  named  Buyat,  to  attach  the  wheat  or  other  effects,  which 
Pierre  Troge  may  have  in  his  possession  belonging  to  the  said 
Buyat,  for  surety  of  the  sum  of  fifty-seven  livres,  which  he  owes 
the  said  M.  Bouvet,  with  prohibition  to  Troge  to  divest  himself 
thereof  on  penalty  of  being  held  responsible  for  the  said  seizure 
of  them.  Given  by  Jean  Bte.  Dubuque,  magistrate,  below  the 
account  of  the  said  M.  Bouvet.  N.  Bouvet. 


4o6  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

du  7  7^^^  I  ordre  a  M'*  aRondel  contre  ant.  harmand  dit  sans 
facon. 

dud^  jour  un  ordre  a  M^  aRundel  Contre  j  B*«  Labecasse. 

8  7^^®  un  ordre  a  frs  monplesir  Engag^  disidore  LaCroix 
contre  Joseph  marie. 


a  une  Cour  du  8.  7^^^  1789. 
M^^  ant®  Girardin  Presidant  henry  Biron 
B*®  DuBuque  Philipe  angel 

p^®  Laperche  Charle  ducharme 

8  7^^®  deHvre  un  ordre  a  Wiliam  aRundel  contre  Louis  Coste. 
dud*  jour  a  la  meme  Cour. 
M^  William  aRundel  demandeur  Contre  Louis  Coste  defendeur 
Sur  la  requete  du  s^  aRundel  demandant  aud*  Coste  la  somme 
de  onze  Cent  soixante  dixhuit  livres  Six  sols,  vu  les  reponse 
dud*  coste  la  Cour  a  ordonne  que  la  saisie  faite  par  le  s^  aRundel 
sur  Louis  Gaud  de  Cent  piastres  Sera  Bonne  et  valable  a  ordonnd 
aud*  Louis  gaud  de  vuider  ses  mains  En  celle  du  s^  aRundel,  et 
ordonne  p^  les  six  cent  soixante  dixhuit  livres  restant  quil  payera 
contant  ou  tiendra  prison  jusqua  ce  quil  ait  donne  Caution  solva- 
ble,    condamne  led*  Coste  aux  Depens  Et  frais. 

dud*  jour:  delivre  un  decret  a  thom  Bredy  Bailly  p^  areter 
Louis  Coste  et  le  tient  a  sa  garde  jusqua  ce  quil  ait  donnd  caution 
au  s^  aRundel. 

Solivan :  Sur  Lexpose  de  jean  Solivan  quil  a  prete  Sa  jument  a 
jean  dempsey  qui  a  Ete  tue  par  les  sauvages.  la  Cour  ordonne  que 

^  I  find  the  name  Charles  Gill  among  the  names  of  Americans  in  Illinois,  and  suggest  it 
as  the  name  intended  here. 

2  The  following  costs  of  this  case  were  recorded  on  a  scrap  of  paper  which  has  been  bound 
into  the  book  near  the  end: 

jrais  contre  coste  a  la  demande  de  Mr  aRundel. 

pr  le  pre  ordre  Et  sentence  Et  copie  1 5 

pr  I  requette  du  7  7  bre  10 

pr  Saisie  et  serment  sur  louis  gaud  10 

pr  I  ordre  de  ce  jour  pr  faire  venir  Coste  % 

pr  la  sentence  stir  la  registre  5 

pr  le  decret  et  enregistrement  5 

pr  le  billet  S 


COURT  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1789  407 

September  5.  Issued  a  summons  to  Charles  Gill  [?]^  in- 
habitant of  Prairie  du  Pont  against  Nicolas  Smith  of  Grand 
Ruisseau  that  he  appear  at  the  Court  of  Tuesday  next,  the  8th  of 
this  month. 

September  7.  One  summons  to  M.  Arundel  against  Ant. 
Harmand  called  Sansfacon.  Same  day.  A  summons  to  M. 
Arundel  against  J.  Bte  Labecasse. 

September  8.  -A  summons  to  Fr.  Monplesir,  engagi  of 
Isidore  LaCroix,  against  Joseph  Marie. 

At  a  Court,  September  8,  1789. 
MM.  Ant.  Girardin,  President.        Henry  Biron. 
Bte.  Dubuque.  Philippe  Engel. 

Pierre  Laperche.  Charles  DuCharme. 

September  8.  Issued  a  summons  to  William  Arundel  against 
Louis  Coste. 

Same  day  at  the  same  Court. 
M.  William  Arundel,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Louis  Coste,  Defendant. 

At  the  request  of  M.  Arundel,  who  demands  of  the  said  Coste 
the  sum  of  eleven  hundred  and  seventy-eight  livres  six  sols,  and 
in  view  of  the  replies  of  the  said  Coste,  the  Court  decreed  that 
the  seizure  made  by  M.  Arundel  on  Louis  Gaud  of  one  hundred 
piastres  shall  be  good  and  valid;  and  it  commanded  Louis  Gaud 
to  deliver  them  into  the  hands  of  M.  Arundel.  And  in  regard 
to  the  six  hundred  and  seventy-eight  livres  remaining  the  Court 
decreed  that  he  (Coste)  shall  pay  cash  or  be  confined  in  prison 
until  he  has  found  solvent  bondsman  therefor.  Condemned  the 
said  Coste  to  pay  the  costs  and  charges. ^ 

Same  day.  Issued  a  decree  to  Tom  Brady  to  arrest  Louis  Coste 
and  hold  him  in  custody  until  he  has  given  surety  to  M.  Arundel. 

Sullivan.  On  the  declaration  of  John  Sullivan  that  he  loaned 
to  John  Dempsey  his  mare,  which  had  been  killed  by  the  savages,' 
the  Court  decrees  that  the  said  Sullivan  shall  take  Dempsey's  and 
that  an  appraisement  shall  be  made  to  decide  their  relative  values, 
and  the  difference  is  to  be  paid. 

3  Dempsey  was  supposed  to  have  been  killed  by  the  Indians,  and  he  was  actually  scalpedi 
but  recovered  from  his  wound. — Reynolds,  Pioneer  History,  143. 


4o8  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

led*  solivan  prendra  celui  de  dempsey  Jit  sera  Estimd  p^  savoir  si  la 
valeur  vaut  celle  de  dimpsey  et  la  plus  ou  moins  valoir  etre  payde. 
a  la  meme  Cour. 

M^  DUMOULIN  demandeur  Contre  Pierre  Lacoste  deffendeur 
Le  s^  dumoulin  a  produit  un  Compte  a  luy  dub  par  pierre 
Coste  de  la  somme  de  deux  mille  onze  livres  douze  sols  six  deniers 
par  ses  Billets  et  comptes.  lesquels  Billets  led*  LaCoste  a  reconnii 
Veritable  Et  a  produit  un  compte  quil  repete  contre  le  s''  dumoulin. 
La  Cour  ordonne  que  les  Billets  et  Comptes  produit  par  le  s^ 
dumoulin  dans  lequel  est  compris  les  frais  des  Effets  quil  a  Envoy^ 
Chercher  dans  la  riviere  des  ilinois  seront  payez  privilegierement 
led*  S^  dumoulin  Etant  p'^  saisissant^  sur  la  pelterie  sucre  Et 
autres  Effets  descendus  avec  les  frais  de  la  presente  instance  et 
autres  qui  seront  fait  a  ce  sujet  Et  quant  au  compte  produit  par 
le  s^  LaCoste  ordonne  que  le  Canot  y  mentionn^  sera  pay^  par 
le  s'"  dumoulin  avec  les  autres  articles  le  tout  a  raport  darbitres 
Et  Gens  Connoissant.  ordonne  en  outre  que  la  pelterie  de- 
scendue  sera  delivree  a  M^  dumoulin  Sur  ce  qui  luy  est  dub  et 
si  elle  ne  suffit  les  sucres  seront  vendus  demain  au  Contant  au 
plus  offrant  et  dernier  Encherisseur  jusques  a  la  Concurance  de 
ladite  somme  Et  frais  Et  si  surplus  y  a  depose  au  greffe  p^  etre 
remis  a  Ses  autres  Creanciers  Et  a  Ete  deduit  par  ces  presentes 
apres  examen  fait  du  Compte  produit  par  led*  LaCoste  la  somme  de 
quatre  vingt  Cinq  livres  p^  le  montant  dud*  compte,  Evaluation  du 
Canot  Et  medecine  partant  revient  aud*  s^  dumoulin  dix  neuf  cent 
vingt  six  livres  douze  sols  six  deniers  non  compris  les  frais  de  justice, 
a  la  meme  Cour. 

Le  S^  DeClamorgan  demandeur  Contre  Pierre  LaCoste 

deffendeur 

Le  demandeur  demande  au  deffendeur  le  payement  de  deux 

Billets  lun  de  la  somme  de  quinze  mille  neuf  cent  quarante  Sept 

livres  quatorze  sols  En  argent  s*  son  obligation  En  datte  du  30 

9^^^  1787.  pass^  au  greffe  de  S*  Louis  par  laquelle  il  apert  que  led* 

1  The  words  "Ledl  Sr  dumoulin  Etant  pr  saisissant"  were  inserted  in  the  margin.  The 
asterisk,  which  marks  the  place  for  insertion,  was  placed  after  "  Sr  "  and  before  "La  Coste," 
below.  Since  the  expression  is  without  meaning  in  that  place,  I  have  inserted  it  here.  In 
both  cases  the  place  of  insertion  falls  at  the  beginning  of  the  line  in  the  manuscript,  so  that 
this  mistake  could  easily  have  been  made. 


COURT  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1789  409 

At  the  same  Court. 

M.  DuMOULEST,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Lacoste,  Defendant. 

M.  Dumoulin  brought  an  account  due  him  by  Pierre  LaCoste 
for  the  sum  of  two  thousand  and  eleven  livres  twelve  sols  six 
denier s  according  to  his  notes  and  accounts;  which  notes  the  said 
LaCoste  recognized  as  true,  and  he  brought  an  account,  which 
he  claims  from  M.  Dumoulin.  The  Court  decrees  that  the  notes 
and  accounts  exhibited  by  M.  Dumoulin,  in  which  is  included  the 
costs  of  the  effects  which  he  sent  to  seek  at  the  Illinois  River,  shall 
be  paid  by  preference,  since  the  said  M.  Dumoulin  is  first  judg- 
ment creditor,^  out  of  the  peltries,  sugar  and  other  effects  brought 
down,  with  the  costs  of  the  present  suit  and  of  others  which  shall 
be  made  in  the  matter;  and  as  to  the  account  exhibited  by  M.  La- 
Coste the  Court  decrees  that  the  canoe  mentioned  therein  shall 
be  paid  for  by  M.  Dumoulin  with  the  other  articles,  all  on  the  report 
of  arbitrators  and  appraisers.  The  Court  decrees,  furthermore, 
that  the  peltries  brought  down  shall  be  delivered  to  M.  Dumoulin 
on  that  which  is  due  him;  and  if  it  is  not  sufficient,  the  sugar 
shall  be  sold  to-morrow  for  cash  to  the  highest  bidder  up  to  the 
equivalent  of  the  said  sum  and  costs;  and  if  there  is  a  siurplus,  it 
shall  be  deposited  at  this  office  to  be  remitted  to  his  other  creditors. 
And  there  has  been  deducted  by  these  presents,  after  examination 
was  made  of  the  account  exhibited  by  the  said  LaCoste,  the  sum 
of  eighty-five  livres,  as  the  amount  of  the  said  account  and  the 
value  of  the  canoe  and  medicine;  therefore  there  is  due  to  the 
said  M.  Dumoulin  nineteen  hundred  and  twenty-six  livres  twelve 
sols  six  denier s,  which  does  not  include  the  costs  of  justice. 
At  the  same  Court. 

M.  Clamorgan,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  LaCoste,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  demands  of  the  defendant  the  payment  of  two 
notes,  one  for  the  sum  of  fifteen  thousand  nine  hundred  and  forty- 
seven  livres  fourteen  sols  in  money  according  to  his  obligation 
under  date  of  November  30,  1787,  drawn  up  at  the  record-office 
of  St.  Louis,  from  which  it  appears  that  the  said  LaCoste  should 
pay  at  Michillimakinac  for  the  release  from  M.  Clarmorgan  a 
sum  of  nine  thousand  livres  in  money;  and  since  he  has  not  satis- 


4IO  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

LaCoste  devoit  payer  a  missilimakina  a  la  decharge  du  s^  Gla- 
morgan une  somme  de  neuf  mille  livres  En  argent  a  quoy  Nayant 
point  satisfait  la  Cour  Condamne  led*  LaCoste  a  payer  son  obli- 
gation en  Entier  avec  les  interest  et  frais.  Condamne  pareille- 
ment  led*  LaCoste  a  payer  son  autre  Billet  montant  a  la  somme 
de  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  trois  livres  dix  huit  sols  ainsy  quil  est 
porte  au  pied  dun  Compte  avec  interest  et  frais.  Le  tout  aprds 
que  led*  LaCoste  a  Reconnti  Ses  dits  Billets  et  Comptes.  En 
concequance  permet  au  s^  Glamorgan  de  faire  saisir  par  la  suite 
les  effets  quil  poura  trouver  apartenir  aud*  Coste  a  la  reserve 
de  ceux  deja  saisy  Et  Sequestres  ce  qui  sera  execute. 
La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  i^^  8^^^  1789. 

A*  Girardin. 
du  30  "j^^^     delivre  un  ordre  p^  fr  trotier  contre  p^^  lafleur 
un  ordre  p^  fr  Saucier  contre  M^  dumoulin 
un  ordre  p^  Coste  contre  sansfacon 
un  ordre  p^  idem  contre  Louval 
un  ordre  p'^  id  contre  macarty 
un  ordre  p^  id  contre  martin 
un  ordre  p'"  id  contre  janot  lapensee 
un  ordre  p^  id  contre  Gecire 
un  ordre  p^  id  contre  antaya 
a  une  Cour  du  i^^  8^^"^  1789. 
M*"^  Girardin  Presidant  p^®  Laperche 

charles  ducharme  henry  Biron 

jean  B*^  dubuque  Magistra 

Entre  le  s^  Francois  trotier  demandeur  Contre  pierre  La- 
fleur deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  reclame  contre  le  deffendeur  la  somme  de 
quarante  sept  livres  quinze  sols  par  son  compte  p^  fournitures 
a  luy  faite  le  deffendeur  a  reconnu  son  compte  et  a  dit  quil  luy 
etoit  dub  sept  gardes  quil  avoit  Ete  Employe  par  ordre  de  M^ 
trotier  p^  laffaire  de  brisson  demande  que  cette  somme  montante 
a  35^^  luy  soit  deduite  sur  son  compte. 

sur  quoy  la  Cour  condamne  le  deffendeur  a  payer  son  compte 
a  M^  trotier  sauf  son  recour  p^"  ses  gardes  ainsi  quil  est  decide  par 
la  sentence  des  jures  concernant  laffaire  de  Brisson  condamne 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1789  411 

fied  this,  the  Court  condemns  the  said  LaCoste  to  pay  his  obli- 
gation in  full  with  interest  and  costs.  The  Court  condemns  the 
said  LaCoste  likewise  to  pay  his  other  note  amounting  to  the 
sum  of  seven  hundred  and  eighty-three  livres  eighteen  sols^  as 
is  entered  at  the  foot  of  an  account,  with  interest  and  costs;  all 
decreed  after  the  said  LaCoste  recognized  his  said  notes  and 
accounts.  Consequently  the  Coiurt  permits  M.  Clamorgan  to 
have  seized  the  effects,  which  he  can  find,  belonging  to  the  said 
Coste  with  the  reservation  of  those  already  seized  and  sequestered, 
for  which  there  will  be  execution. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  October  i,  1789. 

Ant.  Girardin. 
September  30. 
Issued  a  summons  to  Fr.  Trottier  against  Pierre  Lafleur. 
A  summons  to  Fr.  Saucier  against  M.  Dumoulin. 
A  summons  to  Coste  against  Sansfagon. 
A  summons  to  the  same  against  Lonval. 
A  summons  to  the  same  against  Macarty. 
A  summons  to  the  same  against  Martin. 
A  summons  to  the  same  against  Janot  Lapancd. 
A  summons  to  the  same  against  Cesirre. 
A  summons  to  the  same  against  Antaya. 
At  a  Court,  October  i,  1789. 
MM.  Girardin,  President.         Pierre  Laperche. 
Charles  DuCharme.  Henry  Biron. 

Jean  Bte.  Dubuque.  Magistrates 

M.  Francois  Trottier,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Lafleur,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  brings  a  claim  against  the  defendant  for  the  sum 
of  forty-seven  livres  fifteen  sols  by  his  account  for  supplies  sold 
to  him.  The  defendant  recognized  his  account  and  said  that  there 
was  due  him  pay  for  seven  guards  and  that  he  had  been  employed 
by  order  of  M.  Trottier  for  the  affair  of  Brisson  and  he  demands 
that  this  sum  amounting  to  35  livres  be  deducted  from  his  account. 
Whereupon  the  Court  condemns  the  defendant  to  pay  his 
account  to  M.  Trottier  saving  his  recourse  for  his  guards  as  it 
is  decided  by  the  verdict  of  the  jurors  concerning  the  affair  of 
Brisson.     Condemned  Pierre  Lafleur  to  pay  the  costs  which  are 


412  ILLINOIS.HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

pierre  lafleur  aux  frais  liquidez  a  trois  piastres  qui  seront  avancds 
par  M^  trotier  et  a  luy  rembources  par  la  fleur. 
La  Cour  est  ajoume  au  i^^  9^^^  1789. 

A*  Girardin. 
LaChanse:  du  6  8^^®  1789,  delivr^  au  s'"  LaChansse  une  saisie 
p''  une  Vache  Et  Son  vau  sur  pierre  martin. 

antaya:  dud*  jour  delivr^  une  saisie  a  antoine  peltier  dit  antaya 
contre  le  nommd  Wilson  Entre  les  mains  de  Louis  Coste  p^  20 
minots  de  mahis  que  led*  Wilson  doit. 

du  8  8^^^  delivre  une  Saisie  avec  ordre  de  vendre  a  deffaud  par 
pierre  troge  de  vuider  ses  mains  Entre  celles  du  s^  Bouvet  de  la 
farine  ou  bled  quil  a  apartenant  a  antoine  Buy  at  le  i®^  ordre  de 
Saisie  ayant  Ete  signiffie  par  thorn  Bredy  le  15  aoust  p'"  la  s^  de  57. 
ajouter  les  frais  de  ladite  saisie  Et  de  present  executoire  fait  97^^ 
laquelle  Executoire  a  Ete  delivree  audit  S^  Bouvet. 

N  Bouvet. 
Par  Extraordinaire  a  la  demande  de  Charle  Germain, 
aux  temoins 
f  I  ordre  a  M^  trotier 
I    I  ordre  a  ignace  Grondine 
temoins  ^    i  ordre  a  francois  Grondine 
I  ordre  a  duchenau 
I  ordre  a  louis  gaud 
aux  magistrats 
I  ordre  a  M^^  girardin 
I  idem  a  Mr  Philipe  angel 
I  id.  a  Mr  dubuque 
I  id.  a  Mr  ducharme 
I  a  Laperche 
I  a  Biron 
I  a  Chatel 
Les  ordres  ci  dessus  nous  ont  Ete  delivr^s  marq  de 

Brady  + 

Charles  Germain 
I  ordre  a  Louis  p^  sequestre  le  Chelval  in  [sic] 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1789  413 

set  at  three  piastres^  which  shall  be  advanced  by  M.  Trottier  and 
reimbursed  to  him  by  Lafleur. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  November  i,  1789. 

A.  Girardin. 
Lachanse,  Antaya 
October  6,  1789.     Issued  to  M.  Lachanse  a  writ  of  seizure 
for  a  cow  and  its  calf  on  Pierre  Martin. 

Same  day.  Issued  a  writ  of  seizure,  to  Antoine  Pelletier  called 
Antaya  against  the  named  Wilson,  of  20  minots  of  corn  in  the 
hands  of  Louis  Coste  and  which  the  said  Wilson  owes. 

October  8.  Issued  a  writ  of  seizure  with  order  of  sale  because 
of  the  failure  by  Pierre  Troge  to  deliver  into  the  hands  of  M.  Bouvet 
the  flour  or  wheat,  which  he  has,  belonging  to  Antoine  Buyat. 
The  first  writ  of  seizure  was  served  by  Tom  Brady  on  August  15  for 
the  sum  of  57  livres;  adding  the  costs  of  the  present  seizure  and  of 
the  present  execution  it  makes  97  livres,  which  execution  was 
delivered  to  the  said  M.  Bouvet.  N.  Bouvet. 

Specially  at  the  prayer  of  Charles  Germain. 
To  the  witnesses. 

I  summons  to  M.  Trottier. 
I  summons  to  Ignace  Grondine.  1 

I  summons  to  Francois  Grondine. 

I  summons  to  Duchenau.  ^  ^,;; 

I  summons  to  Louis  Gaud. 
To  the  magistrates. 

I  summons  to  M.  Girardin. 
I  ditto  to  M.  Philippe  Engel. 
I  ditto  to  M.  Dubuque. 
I  ditto  to  M.  DuCharme. 
I  to  Laperche. 
I  to  Biron. 
I  to  Chatel. 
The  summons  above  named  have  been  delivered  to  us. 
Brady.  Mark  of  J 

+ 
Charles  Germain.  ^ 
I  order  to  Louis  to  sequester  the  horse.  j 


414  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

A  une  cour  tenue  Extraordinairement 
a    la  demande  Et  requisition  de  Charles  Germain   Centre 
Louis  Gaud. 

13  8^^^^  1789. 
M^^  antoine  girardin  Presidant         Pierre  Laperche 
Charles  ducharme  henri  Biron 

Philipe  Engel  Louis  Chatel 

B^e  Dubuque  magistra 

Le  S^  germain  a  dit  quil  reclamoit  contre  Louis  gaud  Son 
cheval  que  les  sauvages  lui  avoient  vole.  Et  quil  avoit  fait  marche 
avec  led*  Louis  gaud  que  sil  luy  ramenoit  son  Cheval  quil  lui 
donneroit  une  vache  Et  son  veau  a  Choisir  sur  les  siennes,  que 
led*  Louis  gaud  avoit  Emmene  le  Cheval  mais  quil  ne  vouloit  pas 
luy  rendre  a  moins  dune  vache  Et  son  veau  Et  de  plus  un  taureau 
de  dix  huit  mois,  quil  offroit  de  remetre  ladite  vache  Et  le  vau. 
mais  quil  netoit  pas  oblige  suivant  Ses  conventions  de  donner  le 
tauraux  de  plus,  que  led*  Louis  gau  Etoit  libre  de  lammener  pour 
le  prix  convenu  ou  de  le  laisser.  Et  conclu[d]  aux  frais  de  Lex- 
traord^^  contre  led*  Louis  gaud. 

Led*  Louis  gaud  a  repondu  quil  netoit  point  convenu  des 
faits  que  led*  germain  avance  quil  est  vray  quil  est  convenu  avec 
led*  germain  quil  feroit  son  possible  p^  Emmener  son  Cheval 
mais  que  sil  luy  Coutoit  plus  que  la  valeur  de  la  vache  Et  le  vau 
quil  luy  payeroit  les  Surplus  ce  quil  a  Ete  desavoue  par  led* 
Germain  q\ii  a  soutenu  quil  netoit  Convenu  que  de  la  vache  et 
le  vau  offrant  de  fournir  Ses  preuves  a  la  Cour  par  temoins. 
sur  quoy  led*  Germain  a  fait  Comparoitre  m^  francois  trotier 
commandant  Lequel  apres  que  la  cour  la  En  somme  de  dire 
verite  a  dit  que  sEtant  trouve  ches  le  s^  Louis  gaud  lors  que  ger- 
main y  Est  Entre  p^  reclamer  son  Cheval.  quil  a  dit  a  Louis 
gaud  mon  oncle  comme  voules  vous  vous  aranger  je  viens  Chercher 
mon  Cheval.  votre  vache  Et  le  vau  son  dans  ma  Cour  venez 
les  Choisir.  que  Louis  gaud  avoit  repondii  votre  Cheval  ma 
Coute  plus  que  cela  je  ne  pent  pas  vous  le  donner  p'"  le  vache 
Et  le  vau  si  vous  voulez  me  donner  un  taurau  de  dix  huit  mois  de 
surplus  vous  laures.     ou  jen  ay  un  de  pareil  age  si  vous  le  voulez 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1789  415 

At    a   Court   meeting   in   special   session   at   the   prayer   of 
Charles  Germain,  vs.  Louis  Gaud. 
October  13,  1789. 

MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President.      Pierre  Laperche. 

Charles  DuCharme.  Henry  Biron. 

Philippe  Engel.  Louis  Chatel. 

Bte.  Dubuque.  Magistrates. 

M.  Germain  said  that  he  claimed  from  Louis  Gaud  his  horse 
which  the  savages  had  stolen  from  him;  and  that  he  had  made 
a  bargain  with  the  said  Louis  Gaud  that  if  he  brought  his  horse 
back  to  him  that  he  would  give  a  cow  and  her  calf  to  be  chosen 
among  his  stock;  that  the  said  Louis  Gaud  had  brought  away 
the  horse,  but  that  he  refused  to  deliver  it  to  him  except  for  a 
cow  and  her  calf  and  a  bull  of  eighteen  months  to  boot;  that  he 
offered  to  give  the  said  cow  and  her  calf;  but  that  he  was  not 
obliged  according  to  his  agreement  to  give  the  bull  to  boot;  that 
the  said  Louis  Gaud  was  free  to  bring  it  back  for  the  price  agreed 
upon  or  to  leave  it;  and  he  concludes  that  the  costs  of  the 
special  session  should  be  found  against  the  said  Louis  Gaud. 

The  said  Louis  Gaud  replied  that  there  was  no  agreement  in 
regard  to  the  facts  which  the  said  Germain  advances;  that  it  is 
true  that  he  agreed  with  the  said  Germain  to  do  his  best  to  bring 
his  horse  away;  but  that  if  it  cost  him  more  than  the  value  of  the 
cow  and  calf  that  he  should  pay  him  the  extra  cost,  which  has  been 
denied  by  the  said  Germain,  who  maintained  that  the  agreement 
was  only  for  the  cow  and  calf  and  he  offers  to  furnish  proofs 
to  the  Court  by  witnesses.  Whereupon  the  said  Germain  sum- 
moned M.  Francois  Trottier,  commandant,  who,  after  the  Court 
summoned  him  to  tell  the  truth  thereof,  said  that  he  was  present 
at  Louis  Gaud's  when  Germain  entered  there  to  reclaim  his 
horse;  that  he  said  to  Louis  Gaud:  "Uncle!  What  are  you 
going  to  do  about  it  ?  I  have  come  to  get  my  horse.  Your  cow 
and  calf  are  in  my  yard.  Come  and  choose  them;"  that  Louis 
Gaud  replied:  "Your  horse  cost  me  more  than  that.  I  can't 
give  it  to  you  for  the  cow  and  calf.  If  you  wish  to  give  me  a  bull 
of  eighteen  months  to  boot,  you  shall  have  it.     Or  I  have  one 


4i6      •        ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

je  vous  le  donnerez  Et  je  garderay  le  Cheval  a  quoy  Germain 

Navoit  pas  voulti   Consentir.     quil  luy  avoit  repliqu^  je  suis 

convenu  avec  vous  de  vous  donner  une  vache  Et  son  vau  je  vous 

loffre  je  ne  suis  pas  convenu  de  vous  donner  de  surplus  ou  il 

faloit  laisser  mon  Cheval. 

r 
a  fait  venir  ignace  Grondine  lequel  aprds  sermant  par  luy 

fait  de  dire  la  verite  luy  avons  demand^  sil  a  Connoissance  du 
marchd  de  Charles  germain  et  Louis  gaud  a  dit  quil  avoit  con- 
noissance Etant  au  pe  avec  led*  Louis  gaud  comme  son  Engage 
led*  Louis  gaud  lavoit  Envoyd  avec  maillet  pour  aCheter  le  Cheval 
quil  Etoit  party  avec  mailhet  mais  quEtant  aux  qu'etant  [sic] 
arrive  aux  Cotes,  il  Sen  Etoit  Revenu  que  a  son  retour  louis  gaud  luy 
avoit  dit.  pourquoy  Est  tu  reventi  tu  auroit  du  y  aler  tu  sera  Cause 
que  Si  je  nay  pas  le  Cheval.  je  nauray  pas  une  vache  et  son  veau 
qui  ma  Ete  promise  p^  le  Cheval  qui  est  tout  ce  quil  a  dit  savoir. 

avons  fait  venir  francois  Grondine  Lequel  apres  sermant  par 
luy  fait  de  dire  la  verite  luy  avons  demand^  sil  a  Connoissance  du 
marche  fait  Entre  Charles  Germain  Et  louis  gaud,  a  dit  que  quel- 
ques  jours  apres  que  louis  Gaud  Et  germain  Se  Sont  En  arange 
luy  deposans  a  Et^  trouver  louis  gaud  et  luy  a  demande  sil  vouloit 
luy  Emmener  sa  jument  que  les  sauvages  avoient  vole  que  louis 
gaud  luy  avoit  dit  que  sil  vouloit  luy  donner  une  vache  Et  son  veau 
comme  faisoit  germain  quil  la  luy  Emmeneroit  sil  la  trouvoit  que 
luy  deposant  avoit  Consenty  de  luy  donner  une  vache  Et  son  veau 
ou  quarante  piastre  sil  Emmenoit  sa  jument.  mais  quil  ne  lavoit 
pas  Emmende.  qui  est  tout  ce  quil  a  dit  savoir. 

avons  fait  venir  francois  ducheneau  lequel  apres  sermant  par 
luy  fait  de  dire  la  verite  luy  avons  demande  sil  a  Connoissance  du 
marche  fait  Entre  Louis  gaud  Et  Charles  germain  a  dit  que  Etant 
au  pe  Et  alant  avec  maillet  qui  avoit  deja  achete  le  Cheval  dont 
est  question  p^  Louis  gaud  il  avoit  demand^  a  maillet  ce  quil  avoit 
Coute  quil  luy  avoit  repondti  jay  donne  deux  baril  dau  de  vie  a 
choisir  sur  huit  Et  deux  fiUes  [filet  ?]  que  luy  deposans  luy  avoit 
repondu  cest  Bien  Cher,  que  maillet  avec  [sic]  replique.  ce  nest 
pas  trop  Cher  puisque  Louis  gaud  a  une  vache  et  son  vau  p'"  avoir 
le  Cheval  des  sauvages  qui  est  tout  ce  quil  a  dit  savoir. 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1789  417 

of  like  age;  if  you  wish  it,  I  will  give  it  to  you  and  I  will  keep 
the  horse;  "  that  Germain  had  not  wished  to  agree  to  this,  and 
that  he  had  answered:  "I  agreed  with  you  to  give  you  a  cow  and 
her  calf.  I  offer  it  to  you.  I  have  not  agreed  to  give  you  more 
and  [if  it  cost  more]  you  should  have  left  my  horse." 

Have  summoned  Ignace  Grondine  whom,  after  taking  oath  to 
tell  the  truth,  we  asked  if  he  had  knowledge  of  the  bargain  of 
Charles  Germain  and  Louis  Gaud;  and  he  said  that  he  had 
knowledge,  since  he  was  in  Peoria  with  the  said  Louis  Gaud  as 
his  engage;  and  that  the  said  Louis  Gaud  had  sent  him  with 
Mailhet  to  buy  the  horse  and  that  he  had  set  out  with  Mailhet; 
but  that  having  arrived  at  the  Bluffs,  he  had  returned;  that  on 
his  return  Louis  Gaud  had  said  to  him:  "Why  have  you  come 
back?  You  should  have  gone  there.  You  will  be  the  cause 
that  I  do  not  have  the  horse  and  I  shall  not  have  the  cow  and 
her  calf,  which  have  been  promised  me  for  the  horse.  "  This 
is  all  that  he  said  he  knew. 

We  have  summoned  Francois  Grondine,  whom,  after  oath 
was  made  by  him  to  tell  the  truth,  we  have  asked  if  he  had  knowl- 
edge of  the  bargain  made  between  Charles  Germain  and  Louis 
Gaud  and  he  said  that  some  days  after  Louis  Gaud  and  Germain 
had  made  their  bargain,  he,  the  deponent,  was  at  Louis  Gaud's 
and  asked  him,  if  he  wished  to  bring  back  for  him  his  mare  which 
the  savages  had  stolen,  and  that  Louis  Gaud  had  said  to  him 
that  if  he  was  willing  to  give  him  a  cow  and  her  calf  as  Germain 
was  doing,  that  he  would  bring  it  back  to  him,  if  he  found  it; 
and  that  he,  the  deponent,  had  agreed  to  give  him  a  cow  and  her 
calf  or  forty  piastres,  if  he  brought  back  his  mare;  but  that  he 
had  not  brought  it  back;  which  is  all  that  he  said  he  knew. 

We  summoned  Francois  Duchenau,  whom,  after  he  had  made 
oath  to  tell  the  truth,  we  asked  if  he  had  knowledge  of  the  bargain 
made  between  Louis  Gaud  and  Charles  Germain,  and  he  said 
that  he  was  at  Peoria  and  was  walking  with  Mailhet  who  had 
already  bought  the  horse  in  question  for  Louis  Gaud,  and  he 
asked  Mailhet  what  it  had  cost  and  that  he  had  answered  him: 
''I  have  given  two  barrels  of  brandy  to  be  chosen  among  eight  and 


4i8  ILLINOIS  ♦TISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

avons  fait  venir  antoine  girardin  garcon  habitant  lequel  apr^s 
sermant  par  luy  fait  de  dire  la  verite  luy  avons  demande  sil  a 
Connoissance  du  marche  Entre  louis  gaud  Et  Charles  Germain 
a  dit.  quEtant  present  Ches  Louis  gaud  le  jour  que  Germain  y 
est  venu.  led^  germain  luy  a  dit  mon  oncle  Emmenez  moy  mon 
Cheval  je  vous  donnerez  une  vache  Et  son  veau.  que  luy  deposant 
Etant  a  boire  le  filet  na  pas  fait  atention  a  ce  quil  peuvent  setre  dit 
de  plus  lecture  a, luy  faite  de  sa  declaration  a  dit  contenir  verite  Et 
que  cest  tout  ce  quil  sait. 

parties  ouies  et  vu  les  depositions  des  temoins,  la  Cour  assem- 
blee  ay  ant  murement  examine.  EUe  a  Condamne  Et  condamne 
Louis  gaud  a  rendre  le  Cheval  a  Charles  germain.  Et  a  recevoir 
La  vache  et  le  vau  quil  est  conventi  de  luy  donner.  suivant  la 
deposition  des  temoins  condamnons  En  outre  led*  Louis  gaud 
En  tons  les  frais  Et  depens  de  Lextraordinaire  qui  seront  avancez 
par  led*  germain  Et  a  luy  rembourcez  par  led*  Louis  Gaud  suivant 
le  Compte  arrete  par  la  Cour  montant  a  la  somme  de  quatre  Cent 
quatre  vingt  dix  sept  livres  dix  sols  ce  qui  sera  execute  nonobstant 
toute  oposition  ou  apelation.  aux  Cahos  led*  jour  13  8^^^  1789 
Extraordinairemen  t . 
[Signed] 

B*^  Dubuque  Pierre  Laperche 

h  B  i  sa 

Philipe  Engel  Louis  +  Chatel 

DuCharme  marque 

Labuxiere  grefier  A*  Girardin. 

du  26  [?]  8^^^  delivre  une  saisie  a  Charle  germain  Contre  charly 

cadien  sur  un  Cheval  Entre  les  mains  du  s^  Bergeron, 
dud*  jour  delivre  au  meme  une  saisie  contre  le  meme  p^  le  Bled 
quil  a  ches  la  dame  alary. 

^ Filet  is  an  expression  still  used  among  the  French  of  Canada  and  the  Mississippi  valley. 
As  used  below  by  the  next  witness  it  means  a  drink  from  a  faucet  or  bunghole.  In  this  place 
both  the  reading  of  the  word  and  the  interpretation  are  doubtful. 

2  Another  case  of  an  excessive  charge  for  justice,  but  the  session  was  special  and  the  wit- 
nesses numerous. 


COURT  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1789  419 

two  swigs ;^  that  the  deponent  had  answered,  "It  is  very  dear;  " 
that  Mailhet  had  answered:  "It  is  not  too  dear,  since  Louis 
Gaud  has  a  cow  and  her  calf  for  getting  the  horse  from  the  sav- 
ages"; which  is  all  that  he  said  he  knew. 

We  summoned  Antoine  Girardin,  a  boy  and  resident,  whom, 
after  he  had  made  oath  to  tell  the  truth,  we  asked  if  he  had  knowl- 
edge of  the  bargain  between  Louis  Gaud  and  Charles  Germain 
and  he  said  that  he  was  present  at  Louis  Gaud's  the  day  that 
Germain  came  there;  that  the  said  Germain  said  to  Gaud:  "Uncle, 
bring  my  horse  back  to  me  and  I  will  give  you  a  cow  and  her  calf; 
that  he,  the  deponent,  was  taking  a  swig  and  did  not  give  attention 
to  what  they  may  have  said  further.  Reading  made  to  him  of 
his  afl&davit  and  he  has  said  that  it  contained  the  truth  and 
that  it  is  all  that  he  knows. 

After  the  parties  were  heard  and  in  view  of  the  depositions  of 
the  witnesses,  the  Court  in  assembly  after  mature  examination, 
condemned  Louis  Gaud  to  deliver  the  horse  to  Charles  Germain, 
and  to  receive  the  cow  and  the  calf  which  the  latter  agreed  to  give 
him, according  to  the  depositions  of  witnesses;  We  condemn  further- 
more the  said  Louis  Gaud  in  all  costs  and  charges  of  the  special 
session,  which  shall  be  advanced  by  the  said  Germain  and  reim- 
bursed to  him  by  the  said  Louis  Gaud,  according  to  the  account 
determined  by  the  Court  and  which  amount  to  the  sum  of  four 
hundred  and  eighty-seven  livres  ten  sols,^  for  which  there  will  be 
execution  notwithstanding  all  opposition  or  appeal.  At  Cahokia 
the  said  day,  October  13,  1789.  Held  specially. 
[Signed] 

Bte.  Dubuque.  Pierre  Laperche. 

hBi  His 

Philippe  Engel.  Louis  +  Chatel. 

DuCharme.  mark. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk.  A.  Girardin. 

October  26  [?].     Issued  to  Charles  Germain  against  Charly 
Cadien  a  writ  of  seizure  of  a  horse  in  the  possession  of  M.  Bergeron. 
Same  day.     Issued  to  the  same  a  writ  of  seizure,  against  the 
same,  of  the  wheat  which  he  has  at  Madame  Alarie's. 


420  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

A  une  Cour  du  deux  Novembre  1789. 
M^^  antoine  girardin  Presidant  Pierre  Laperche 
jean  B^^  dubuque  Louis  Chatel 

Charles  ducharme  henry  Biron 

Philipe  angel  Magistrats 

a  ladite  Cour. 
M^  Laille  demandeur  Contre  Louis  Coste  deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  repete  contre  le  deffendeur  116^^  17^  En  argent 
Et  23^^  17^  En  farine  que  le  deffendeur  Convient  devoir  sur  quoy 
\e[sic]  Cour  le  Condamne  a  payer  sans  delais  Condamnons  le  s^  laille 
aux  frais  p^  Navoir  pas  demande  son  payement  laquelle  sentence 
sera  executee  sous  vingt  quatre  heures. 
a  la  meme  cour. 
FRANCOIS    HUBERDEAU    demandeur    Contre    pierre    durbois 

deffendeur 
Le  demandeur  repete  contre  le  deffendeur  un  billet  de  Cent 
Cinquante  livres  Echus. 

le  deffendeur  la  reconnu  veritable. 

sur  quoy  la  Cour  condamne  le  deffendeur  a  payer  son  Billet 
savoir  la  farine  a  30^^  le  Cent  Et  le  mahis  a  5^^  le  sac  marchand. 
le  tout  sans  delais  condamne  dubardeau  [sic]  aux  frais  liquidez  a 
15^^  tant  p^  Huissier  lordre  au  greffier  que  la  presente  sentence, 
delivre  un  decret  du  prise  de  Corps  a  ladite  Cour  a  demande 
de  M^  de  Clamorgan  Contre  francois  Clark  ameriquain. 
a  la  meme  Cour. 
La  Cour  est  ajourn^e  au  i^^  x^^^  1789. 

A*  Girardin. 
du  10  9^^^  jy3p^ 
delivr6  une  saisie  a  M^  Dumoulin  charge  p'"  m^  Labadie,  une 
Saisie  conservatoire  contre  jean  B^^  Lapierre  forgeron  et  sa 
femme  sur  la  somme  de  1166^^  que  luy  doit  Philipe  gervais  con- 
jointement  avec  sa  femme  sous  Ihypoteque  de  leurs  Biens  en 
datte  du  jour  de  hier  par  leur  obligation  deposee  au  Notaria  de 
cette  justice  payable  a  la  toussaint  1790  ladite  saisie  faite  p^  la 
somme  de  280^^  en  paux  de  Chevreuil  Razde  payable  En  may 
1790  p  Dumoulin 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1789  421 

At  a  Court,  November  2,  1789. 
MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President. 
Jean  Bte.  Dubuque.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Charles  DuCharme.  Louis  Chatel. 

Philippe  Engel.  Henry  Biron. 

Magistrates. 
At  the  said  Court. 
M.  Laille,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Louis  Coste,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  brings  claim  against  the  defendant  for  116  livres 
17  sols  in  money  and  23  livres  17  sols  in  flour,  which  the  defendant 
acknowledges  that  he  owes.    Whereupon  the  Court  condemned 
him  to  pay  without  delay.    We  condemn  M.  Laille  to  pay  the 
costs  for  not  having  demanded  his  payment,  which  judgment 
shall  be  put  in  execution  within  twenty-four  hours. 
At  the  same  Court. 
Francois  Huberdeau,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Dubois, 
Defendant 
The  plaintiff  brings  claim  against  the  defendant  for  a  note  of 
one  hundred  and  fifty  livres,  which  has  fallen  due. 
The  defendant  acknowledges  it  as  genuine. 
Whereupon  the  Court  condemns  the  defendant  to  pay  his 
note,  to  wit:   the  flour  at  30  livres  the  hundred  and  the  corn  at 
5  livres  the  trading  sack,  and  all  without  delay;   and  condemns 
Huberdeau  to,  pay  the  costs,  fixed  at  15  livres  as  well  for  the 
huissier  and  the  order  to  the  clerk  as  for  the  present  judgment. 
Issued  a  writ  of  capias  at  the  said  Court  on  prayer  of  M. 
Clamorgan  against  Francis  Clark,  American. 
At  the  same  Court. 
The  Coiurt  adjourned  to  December  i,  1789. 

Ant.  Girardin. 
November  10,  1789. 
Issued  to  M.  Dumoulin,  trustee  for  M.  Labadie,  a  writ  of  conser- 
vative seizure  against  Jean  Bte.  Lapierre,  blacksmith,  and  his  wife 
on  the  sum  of  11 66  livres ,  which  Philip  Gervais,  jointly  with  his  wife, 
owes  Lapierre  under  mortgage  of  their  goods  according  to  their  obli- 
gation, dated  yesterday,  deposited  in  the  office  of  the  notary  of  the 


422  ILLINOIS  .HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

du  26  9  ^^«  1789 

delivre  une  saisie  a  M^  antoine  thibault  Centre  jean  B*®  Lapierre 
pour  saisir  Conservatoirement  Entre  les  mains  de  philipe  gervais 
la  somme  de  deux  Cent  onze  livres  et  20^^  p^  la  saisie  sur  la 
somme  de  Neuf  cent  soixante  Et  quelque  livres  que  led*  gervais 
doit  aud*  Lapierre  par  son  obligation  au  Notaria  de  ce  poste 
payable  lauthomne  1790  avec  deffences  de  sen  dessaisir  quil 
nen  soit  par  la  Cour  ordon^  ladite  saisie  delivre  a  thorn  Bredy 
huissier  sign^e  ducharme  magistra 

P.  Tabeau 
du  28.  9^""^  delivre  une  Saisie  privilegiee  Et  provisoire  au  s'^ 
Robidoub.  sur  les  Biens  meubles,  une  maison  Et  quatre  Che- 
vaux  apartenant  a  Louis  gaud  jusqua  ce  que  la  Cour  En  ay  or- 
donn^  p^  surety  de  la  s^  de  1464^^  en  pelterie  que  led*  Louis 
gaud  doit  aud*  Robidoub  p^  marchandises  de  traite. 

Jh  Robidou 
30.  9^^^    delivre  un   ordre  a  pierre  Gassien  p^  faire  comproitre 

devant  la  Cour  au  i^^  x^^^  antoine  la  Cource. 
30.  9^^^    delivre  un  ordre  a  M^  dumoulin  contre  marin  pencrasse. 
30.  9^^^    delivr^  un  ordre  au  s^  harmand  contre  Gabriel  Baron, 
du.  30.  9^^^     delivre  un  ordre  a  motard  contre  fs.  Lapens^e. 


a  une  Cour  du  i®^  decembre  1789. 
M'"^  antoine  girardin  Presidant        p'^^  LaPerche 
Philipe  angel  Louis  Chatel 

B*e  Dubuque  Magistrats 

M^  Dumoulin  Contre  marin  Pencrasse 
Le  demandeur  repete  Contre  le  deffendeur  la  somme  de  quatre 
vingt  dix  sept  livres  douze  sols  six  deniers  p'"  55^  de  sucre  net 


COURT  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1789  423 

jurisdiction  and  payable  on  All  Saints  day,  1790;  the  said  seizure  was 
made  for  the  sum  of  280  livres  in  buckskin,  payable  in  May,  1790. 

Jn.  Dumotdin. 
November  26,  1789. 
Issued  a  writ  of  seizure  to  Antoine  Thibault  against  Jean  Bte. 
Lapierre  to  seize  conservatively  from  the  hands  of  Philippe  Gervais 
the  sum  of  two  hundred  and  eleven  livres,  and  20  livres,  for  the 
writ  of  seizure,  from  the  sum  of  nine  hundred  and  sixty  and  some 
livres,  which  the  said  Gervais  owes  the  said  Lapierre  by  his 
obligation  at  the  office  of  the  notary  of  this  post  payable  in  the 
autumn  of  1790,  with  prohibition  to  divest  himself  of  whatever 
there  is  thereof.  Decreed  by  the  Court,  the  said  writ  of  seizure 
was  delivered  to  Tom  Brady,  huissier,  and  was  signed  by  Du- 
Charme,  magistrate.  P.  Tabeau. 

November  28. 
Issued  a  writ  of  privileged  and  provisional  seizure  to  M. 
Robidou  on  the  personal  property,  a  house  and  four  horses  be- 
longing to  Louis  Gaud,  until  the  Court  has  decreed  thereon,  to 
be  held  for  surety  of  the  sum  of  1464  livres  in  peltries,  which  the 
said  Louis  Gaud  owes  the  said  Robidou  for  merchandise  of  trade.. 

Jh.  Robidou. 
November  30.     Issued  a  summons  to  Pierre  Gassien  to  cause 
to  appear  before  the  Court  of  December  ist  Antoine  LaCource. 
November  30.     Issued  a  summons  to  M.  Dumoulin  against 
Marin  Pencrasse. 

November  30.     Issued  a  summons  to  M.  Harmand  against 
Gabriel  Baron. 

November  30.     Issued  a  summons  to  Motard  against  Fr. 
Lapancd. 

At  a  Court,  December  i,  1789. 
MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President.         Pierre  Laperche. 
Philippe  Engel.  Louis  Chatel. 

Bte.  Dubuque.  Magistrates. 

M.  Dumoulin,  Plaintiff  vs.  Marin  Pencrasse. 
The  plaintiff  brings  claim  against  the  defendant  for  the  sum 
of  ninety-seven  livres  twelve  sols  six  denier s  for  55  lbs.  of  sugar  net 


424  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  35"  6*^  la  Lx  avec  les  frais.  le  defifendeur  a  reconnu  devoir 
la  dite  somme  mais  quil  navoit  pas  de  quoy  payer  pour  le 
present. 

Vu  la  reconnoissance  dud*  marin  Pencrasse  qui  a  reconnti 
devoir  ladite  somme  la  Cour  la  Condamn^  a  payer  Sous  quinze 
jours  aux  memes  conditions  de  L'Encan  Bled  ou  farin  Et  aux 
frais. 

a  la  meme  cour 

Sur  la  requete  expositive  des  S'*^  Laille  Et  arundel  marchand 
de  ce  poste  que  quelques  marchands  de  St  Louis  faisoient  des 
avances  au  s^  Louis  gaud,  qui  se  trouve  Extremement  En  debte, 
les  quels  Enlevent  le  produit  des  avances  qui  a  Et^  faites  aud* 
Louis  gaud  par  les  marchands  et  autres  particuliers  de  ce  poste  ce 
qui  fait  un  tor  Et  une  fraude  notable  a  ceux  qui  avance  aud*  Louis 
gaud  sur  cette  partie  tant  aux  marchands  qua  dautres  particuliers 
de  ce  dit  poste,  La  Cour  En  vertu  de  la  requete  du  s^  Laille  Et  du 
s^  arundel  Et  autres  representant  deffend  aud*  Louis  gaud  de 
faire  aucun  payement  sur  lautre  Rive  ny  dy  faire  traverser 
aucunnes  pelteries  ou  payement  ny  meme  aucunes  marchan- 
dises  Effets  de  quelque  nature  quils  soient  declare  En  outre  la 
saisie  faite  par  le  s'"  Robidoub  de  nule  valeur  Et  comme  non 
faite  quil  nait  auparavant  Entierement  satisfait  toutes  les 
Creances  Et  debtes  quil  doit  sur  cette  Rive  a  peine  de  Confisca- 
tion des  dites  pelteries  ou  payement  quil  pouroit  Envoyer  qui 
seront  saisie  p^  satisfaire  aux  Creances  dicy  ce  qui  sera  Execute 
lesd*  jourEt  an. 

A^  Girardin. 
a  la  meme  Cour. 

Pierre  Gassien  demandeur  Contre  Antoine  LaCource 
defaillant  Nayant  voulu  comparoir  apres  Assignation  a  luy 
donn^e  le  jour  de  hier. 

Vu  la  demande  dud*  Gassien  contre  Led*  LaCource  mon- 
tant  a  la  somme  de  trois  cent  dix  livres.  savoir  250^^  p^  une 
terre  Et  60^^  p'*  salaire  douvrage.  condanmons  led*  antoine 
LaCource  a  payer  led*  Gassien  sans  delais  et  aux  frais  et 
depens. 


COURT  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1789  425 

at  35  sols  6  deniers  the  pound  with  costs.  The  defendant  ac- 
knowledged that  he  owes  the  said  sum,  but  says  that  he  has  no 
means  to  pay  at  present. 

In  view  of  the  acknowledgment  of  the  said  Marin  Pencrass, 
who  has  acknowledged  that  he  owes  the  said  sum,  the  Court  con- 
demned him  to  pay  within  the  fortnight  wheat  or  flour  on  the  same 
conditions  as  given  at  the  auction.  Condemned  him  to  pay  the 
costs. 

At  the  same  Court. 
On  the  explanatory  petition  of  MM.  Laille  and  Arundel, 
tradesmen  of  this  post,  that  some  tradesmen  of  St.  Louis  were 
making  to  M.  Louis  Gaud,  who  is  greatly  in  debt,  advances  which 
are  absorbing  the  proceeds  of  the  advances  which  were  made  to 
the  said  Louis  Gaud  by  traders  and  others  individuals  of  this  post, 
an  act  which  is  effecting  a  wrong  and  considerable  fraud  to  those 
on  this  side,  both  tradesmen  and  other  individuals  of  this  post,  who 
have  made  advances  to  the  said  Louis  Gaud  ;  the  Court  in  virtue 
of  the  petition  of  M.  Laille  and  M.  Arundel  and  other  representa- 
tives forbids  the  said  Louis  Gaud  to  make  any  payment  on  the 
other  bank,  to  send  across  any  peltries  or  payment  or  likewise 
any  merchandise,  effects  of  whatsoever  nature;  and  it  declares, 
furthermore,  the  seizure  made  by  M.  Roubidou  of  no  value  and 
as  not  made,  until  the  said  Gaud  has  first  entirely  satisfied  all  the 
claims  and  debts  which  he  owes  on  this  bank,  on  penalty  of  con- 
fiscation of  the  said  peltries  or  payment  that  he  may  send  and  these 
shall  be  seized  to  satisfy  the  claims  of  this  place,  for  which  there 
will  be  execution  the  said  day  and  year. 

Ant.  Girardin. 
At  the  same  Court. 
Pierre  Gassipn  plaintiff,  vs.  Antoine  LaCource  absent,  having 
refused  to  appear  after  summons  was  served  on  him  yesterday. 
In  view  of  the  claim  of  the  said  Gassien  against  LaCource 
amounting  to  the  sum  of  three  hundred  and  ten  livres,  to  wit  250 
livres  for  a  plantation  and  60  livres  for  wages,  we  condemn  the 
said  LaCource  to  pay  the  said  Gassien  without  delay  with  costs 
and  charges. 


426  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

a  la  meme  Cour. 
Le  s'*  MoTARD  demandeur  Centre  Francois   Lapens^e  def- 

f  endeur 

sur  les  contestations  des  comptes  reciproques  que  les  deux 
parties  ont  produit  lun  contre  lautre.  La  Cour  a  renvoye  les  deux 
partis  pardevant  M^  William  aRundel  Et  M^  jean  dumoulin  Et 
M^  Laille  p'"  arbitrer  led*  compte  Et  Larreter  auquel  arrete  de 
Compte  les  parties  se  soumetront  ce  qui  sera  execute. 

La  Cour  est  ajourn^e  au  i®^  Janvier  1789. 

A*  Girardin. 
du  3  X^^e  1789. 

Est  comparu  au  greffe  de  cette  justice  Le  S^  antoine  Thabault 
Negociant  de  Cahos  lequel  a  requis  lenregistrement  de  Lordon- 
nance  cy  apr^s. 

Nous  antoine  girardin  Presidant  Et  magistra  de  la  Cour  du 
district  des  Cahos.  Sur  les  representations  a  nous  faites  par  le 
s^  antoine  tabault  Negociant  de  cette  Rive  et  y  ayant  sermant  de 
fidelity  Etablissant  Son  domicile  En  la  maison  de  Charles  Lefevre 
habitant  de  ce  poste,  lequel  En  Sa  dite  quality  de  Citoyen  de  cette 
dite  Rive  auroit  apris  que  les  Biens  de  Louis  gaud  traiteur  de  ce 
poste  avoient  Ete  Saisis  par  le  S^  Robidoub  marchand  de  la  Rive 
espagnole  Sous  pretexte  davances  faites  aud*  Louis  gaud  laquelle 
saisie  a  Ete  par  cette  Cour  Ennulee  le  premier  de  ce  mois.  afin 
que  les  vray  Citoyen  de  cette  Rive,  reconnus  pour  tel  ayent  le 
privilege  dEtre  payez  Sur  les  Biens  dud*  Louis  gault  preferable- 
ment  a  tous  les  autres  Commerceants  Etrangers  qui  nont 
aucun  sermant  de  fidelite  Sur  cette  Rive  Et  gouvernment  ameri- 
quain. 

EN  CONSEQUANCE  nous  avons  Permis  Et  Permetons  aud* 
S''  antoine  thabault  Negociant  de  cette  Rive  y  ayant  Sermant  de 
fidelity  Et  y  ayant  Etably  son  domicile  de  Saisir,  arreter  Et  metre 
Sous  la  main  de  la  justice  tous  les  Biens  meubles  Et  immeubles 
dud*  Louis  gault  comme  Son  dernier  Equipeur.  Saisir,  arreter 
Sequestrer  Et  y  Etablir  gardien  et  depositaire  a  toutes  les  pelteries 
graisses  huiles  et  autres  effets  que  led*  Louis  gault  poura  faire  Et 
En  mener  icy  de  ces  traites  meme  ceux  quil  Se  trouvera  avoir  En 


COURT  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1789  427 

At  the  same  Court. 

M.  MoTARD,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Francois  Lapance,  Defendant. 

On  account  of  the  disagreement  of  the  reciprocal  accounts 
which  the  two  parties  have  brought  against  each  other,  the  Court 
dismissed  the  two  parties  to  arbitrate  and  settle  the  said  account 
before  M.  William  Arundel,  M.  Jean  Dumoulin  and  M.  Laille 
to  which  settlement  the  parties  shall  submit;  for  which  there  will 
be  execution. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  January  i,  1789. 

Ant.  Girardin. 
December  3,  1789. 

There  appeared  at  the  record  office  of  this  Court  M.  Ant. 
Tabeau,  merchant  of  Cahokia,  who  required  the  registration  of 
the  following  decree. 

We  Antoine  Girardin,  president  and  magistrate  of  the  Court 
of  Cahokia,  on  the  representation  made  to  us  by  M.  Antoine 
Tabeau,  merchant  of  this  bank,  who  has  made  oath  of  fidelity  there- 
to and  established  his  domicile  in  the  house  of  Charles  Lefevre, 
resident  of  this  post,  and  who,  in  his  quality  of  citizen  of  this  bank, 
has  learned  that  the  goods  of  Louis  Gaud,  trader  of  this  post, 
had  been  seized  by  M.  Robidou,  merchant  of  the  Spanish  bank, 
under  pretext  of  advances  made  to  the  said  Louis  Gaud,  which 
seizure  was  annulled  by  this  Court  the  first  of  this  month,  in  order 
that  the  true  citizens  of  this  bank,  and  known  as  such,  should 
have  the  privilege  of  being  paid  from  the  goods  of  the  said  Louis 
Gaud  in  preference  of  all  other  alien  merchants  who  have  taken 
no  oath  of  fidelity  on  this  bank  and  to  the  American  government. 

IN  CONSEQUENCE  we  have  permitted  and  do  permit  the 
said  Antoine  Tabeau,  merchant  of  this  bank  who  has  taken  oath 
of  fidelity  thereto  and  established  his  domicile  thereon,  to  seize, 
distrain  and  place  under  the  hand  of  justice  all  the  goods,  personal 
and  real,  of  the  said  Louis  Gaud,  as  last  furnisher;  to  seize,  dis- 
train, sequester  and  establish  a  guardian  therefor  and  a  depositary 
•for  all  peltries,  tallow,  oil  and  other  effects  which  the  said  Louis 
Gaud  may  make  and  bring  thereof  to  this  place  by  his  trades,  and 
also  those  which  he  shall  be  found  to  have  in  his  possession  in  his 


428  ILLINOIS  piSTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

sa  pocession  dans  Sa  maison,  Lesquelles  pelteries  Seront  mises 
En  depot  a  la  Garde  Et  ches  le  S^  Isidore  laCroix  qui  sen  Chargera 
jusqua  la  Cour  prochaine  pour  En  Etre  ordonne  ce  que  de  raison. 
le  tout  pour  Surete  des  Sommes  dEquipement  que  led^  S'*  Tha- 
bault  a  fait  aud<^  Louis  gault  En  qualite  de  marchand  citoyen  de 
cette  Rive  Et  comme  dernier  Equipeur  Et  encore  pour  surete  de 
Cent  Soixante  treize  livres  En  argent  ou  pelterie  que  led*  Louis 
gaud  reste  devoir  Sur  Son  obligation  de  LEncan  de  deffunt  augus- 
tin  dubuque  Echus  depuis  le  quinze  davril  dernier  suivant  Linter- 
vention  du  S^  Labuxiere  Charge  de  ladite  sucession  En  joint  au 
bailly  de  cette  Cour  de  proceder  a  ladite  saisie  aussitost  la  requisi- 
tion dud*  S^  thabault  avec  les  formalite  requises  donnons  la  pre- 
sente  Saisie  Non  sur  les  Chevaux  qui  serviront  aud*  Louis  gault 
pour  plus  grande  facilite  dans  Son  Commerce,  mais  sur  tous  autres 
articles  Et  effets  cy  devant  detailles  conditionelement  que  le  s^ 
a  Rundel  et  laille  seront  present  lors  de  la  livraison  des  pelteries 
Et  effets  du  s^  Louis  gault  au  depositaire  le  s^  LaCroix  Et 
en  feront  eux  meme  linvantaire  Et  la  presente  sera  Enregistree 
au  greffe  de  ce  poste  pour  y  avoir  Recour  quand  Besoin  sera 
donne  aux  Cahos  le  3  X^^^  1789.  signe  Thabault  Saisissant  Et 
ant^  Girardin  Presidant.  Et  a  linstant  Loriginal  du  present 
Enregistrement  remis  ez  [sic]  mains  dud*  s^  Thabault  lesd*  jour 
Et  an. 

Labuxiere  grefier. 

Je  Soussigne  a  deffaud  huissier  comme  ayant  ete  Requis  par 
luy  en  presence  des  temoins  Soussignes  signiffie  la  presente  sen- 
tence Et  Saisie  a  la  dame  Louis  gault  En  labsence  de  son  mary  En 
parlant  a  Sa  person  En  son  domicile  led*  jour  Et  an  que  dessus 
signe  Billet  p^  thom  Brady  huissier. 

En  concequance  avons  saisis  et  Saisisons  une  maison  a  vide 
maintenant  ladite  dame  Et  sa  famille,  une  armoire  a  deux  Battans, 
un  miroir  a  cadre  dor  une  paire  de  Boeuf  une  vache  avec  son 
veau,  deux  genisses  de  trois  ans  Cinq  pourceaux,  plusieurs  meubles 
de  menages  aux  Cahos  le  3.  X^^^  1789  signe  Billet  p^  thom  Bredy. 
En  outre  plusieurs  marchandises  drats  couvertes  &c.  que  ladite 
dame  a  declare  avoir  Recu  de  M^  thabault  lors  que  son  Epoux  a 


COURT  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1789  429 

house;  which  peltries  shall  be  deposited  in  the  custody  and  at  the 
house  of  M.  Isidore  LaCroix,  who  shall  be  intrusted  therewith 
until  the  next  Court,  that  there  may  be  decreed  concerning  them, 
for  which  this  act  is  sufficient.  This  is  done  to  assure  the  sums 
for  equipment  which  the  said  M.  Tabeau  has  made  to  the  said 
Louis  Gaud,  in  his  title  of  citizen  trader  of  this  bank  and  last 
furnisher,  and  also  for  surety  for  one  hundred  and  seventy-three 
livres  in  money  or  peltries  which  the  said  Louis  Gaud  still  owes  on 
his  note  given  for  the  goods  bought  at  the  auction  of  the  deceased 
Augustin  Dubuque,  matured  since  the  fifteenth  of  April  last, 
according  to  the  intervention  of  M.  Labuxiere  who  is  intrusted 
with  the  said  estate.  And  we  have  enjoined  on  the  bailiff  of  this 
Court  to  proceed  to  the  said  seizure  as  soon  as  he  receives  the 
requisition  with  the  necessary  formalities  from  the  said  M.  Ta- 
beau. We  do  not  give  the  present  writ  of  seizure  on  the  horses, 
which  will  serve  the  said  Louis  Gaud  to  conduct  his  commerce 
with  greater  facility,  but  on  all  other  articles  and  effects  here- 
before  mentioned  in  detail,  under  the  condition  that  MM. 
Arundel  and  Laille  shall  be  present  at  the  time  of  the  delivery  of 
the  peltries  and  effects  of  M.  Louis  Gaud  to  the  guardian,  M. 
LaCroix,  and  they  shall  themselves  make  an  inventory  thereof; 
and  the  present  shall  be  registered  at  the  office  of  this  post  in 
order  to  have  recourse  thereto,  when  there  shall  be  need. 
Given  at  Cahokia  December  3,  1787.  Signed  Tabeau,  execution 
creditor,  and  Ant.  Girardin,  president.  And  now  the  original 
of  the  present  registry  was  delivered  into  the  hands  of  the  said  M. 
Tabeau  the  said  day  and  year. 

Labuxiere,  Clerk. 

I,  the  undersigned,  in  default  of  the  huissier  and  as  requested 
by  him,  in  the  presence  of  the  undersigned  witnesses,  have  served 
the  present  decree  and  writ  of  seizure  on  Madame  Louis  Gaud  in 
the  absence  of  her  husband  and  I  have  spoken  to  her  in  person 
at  her  place  of  residence,  the  said  day  and  year  as  above.  Signed 
Billet  for  Tom  Brady,  huissier. 

In  consequence  we  have  seized  and  do  seize  a  house  vacated 
now  by  the  said  lady  and  her  family,  a  closet  with  two  folding 


430  ILLINOIS,  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

pris  son  Equipement.     cahos  le  3.  X^^^  jygp  Billet  p'^  thorn  Bredy 
F.  Saucier  Et  isadore  lacroix  temoins 

Nous  Soussignes  avons  receptez  la  quantite  de  Cinq  cent  quar- 
ante  trois  livres  Et  demi  des  paux  de  Chevreuil  livres  par  m^  Louis 
gault  a  M^  isadore  lacroix,  sur  les  quelles  il  se  trouve  Cinquante 
deux  livres  visiees  Et  une  grande  parties  parmi  les  Bonnes  trop 
mouill^s  pour  ne  pas  souffrier  une  grande  diminution,  de  plus  nous 
avons  compte  Sept  paux  dours,  quatre  mauvaises  paux  doussons 
signe  izadore  LaCroix,  arundel,  saucier. 

Sur  les  quatre  heures  apres  midy  je  me  suis  transports  En  la 
maison  ou  reside  le  s'^  LaCroix  et  ay  Saisy  au  Nom  de  thom  Bredy 
huissier  de  ce  district  les  pelteries  mentionnees  cy  dessus  Et  ay 
Saisy  le  tout  dans  la  susdite  maison  sous  les  garanties  du  S^  an- 
toine  thabault  led^  jour  Et  an  que  dessus  En  presence  du  s^  Isi- 
dore la  Croix  qui  a  signe  la  present,  signe  izidore  laCroix.  P'^® 
Billet  p^  thom  Brady. 

Et  a  linstant  moy  grefier  soussignS  ay  Remis  loriginal  du 
present  Enregistrement  aud*  s^  antoine  Thabault  lesd*  jour 
Et  an. 

P  Tabeau  Labuxiere  grefier 

Du  7X^^^1789 
une  saisie  p^  Le  S^  Labuxiere  contre  motard 

Nous  antoine  girardin  Presidant  magistra  &c.  Nous  saisis- 
sons  Et  arretons  Entre  les  mains  de  francois  Lapensee  la  somme 
de  85^^  que  led*  motard  doit  au  s'^  Labuxiere  st  le  Comte  de  frais 
a  luy  dub  par  led*^  motard  Et  par  nous  arrete  luy  faison  deffences 
de  sen  dessaisir  enver  qui  que  ce  soit  que  le  compte  ne  soit  Entiere- 
ment  paye  par  led*  motard  aud*  s^  Labuxiere  a  peine  d  En  repond 
En  Son  nom  Et  jusqua  Ce  que  la  Cour  En  ay  ordonnS  aux  Cahos 
le  7  X^^^  1789.     SignS  ant^  girardin  Presidant. 

Recti  la  presente  saisie  francois  LapancS 
Du  28.  X^'"^    delivre  un  ordre  a  la  veuve  henry  Golding  ameri- 

quaine  contre  josiah  Ryan  habitant  ameriquain  demeurant  a 

la  Rivierre  de  laigle  pour  comparoitre  a  la  cour  du  2.  Janvier 

1790.    pour  repondre  a  la  demande  de  la  dite  veuve  pour 

lenlevement  que  led*  Golding  a  fait  de  Ses  effets  Et  Biens. 


COURT  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1789  431 

doors,  a  mirror  with  gilt  frame,  a  yoke  of  oxen,  a  cow  with  her 
calf,  two  three  year  old  heifers,  five  pigs,  several  pieces  of  furniture. 
At  Cahokia  December  3,  1789.  Signed,  Billet  for  Tom  Brady. 
Furthermore  some  merchandise,  cloth,  coverings,  etc,  which 
the  said  lady  declared  she  had  received  from  M.  Tabeau  at  the 
time  that  her  husband  took  his  equipment.  Cahokia,  December 
3,  1789.  Billet  for  Tom  Brady,  F.  Saucier,  and  Isidore  LaCroix, 
witnesses. 

We,  the  undersigned,  have  received  the  quantity  of  five  hun- 
dred and  forty-three  and  a  half  pounds  of  deer-skins,  delivered  by 
M.  Louis  Gaud  to  M.  Isidore  LaCroix,  among  which  there  are 
found  fifty-two  pounds  spoiled  and  a  large  part  of  the  good, 
too  moulded  not  to  suffer  a  great  decrease  in  value.  Furthermore, 
we  have  account  of  seven  bear-skins,  four  bad 'skins  of  bear's  cubs. 
Signed,  Isidore  LaCroix,  Arundel,  Saucier. 

At  four  hours  after  noon  I  have  gone  to  the  house  where  M. 
LaCroix  resides  and  seized  in  the  name  of  Tom  Brady,  huissier  of 
this  district,  the  peltries  mentioned  above  and  have  seized  all  in 
the  house  aforesaid  under  the  guaranty  of  M.  Antoine  Tabeau, 
the  said  day  and  year  as  above,  in  the  presence  of  M.  Isidore 
LaCroix  who  has  signed  the  present.  Signed,  Isidore  LaCroix, 
Pierre  Billet  for  Tom  Brady. 

And  now  I,  the  undersigned  clerk,  have  returned  the  original 
of  the  present  registry  to  the  said  M.  Antoine  Tabeau  the  said 
day  and  year. 

P.  Tabeau.  .  Labuxiere,  Clerk. 

December  7,  1789. 

A  writ  of  seizure  for  M.  Labuxiere  against  Motard. 

We,  Antoine  Girardin,  president,  magistrate  etc.  We  seize 
and  attach  the  sum  of  85  livres,  in  the  possession  of  Francois 
Lapancd,  which  the  said  Motard  owes  M.  Labuxiere  according  to 
the  account  of  costs  due  to  him  by  the  said  Motard  and  by  us 
closed;  and  we  forbid  him  to  part  therewith  to  any  one  whom- 
soever until  the  account  be  paid  entirely  by  the  said  Motard 
to  the  said  M.  Labuxiere,  on  pain  of  being  responsible  therefor 
in    his  name,    and  until  the  Court  has   issued  decree  thereon. 


432 


ILLINOtS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


du  30  X^^"®  delivre  un  ordre  a  antoine  harmand  dit  Sans  facon 
Contre  William  Biggs  ameriquain  pour  paroitre  a  la  Cour  du  2 
Janvier  1790. 


Du  2.  Janvier  1790.     a  une  Cour  tenue  par 
M  ""^  antoine  girardin  Philipe  angel 

Charles  ducharme  Bte  Dubuque 

Pierre  Laperche 
Entre  la  veuve  henry  golding  demanderesse  Contre 

josiAH  RYAN  deffendeur 
apr^s  avoir  oui  les  parties  En  leur  demande  Et  Reponse  Ja  Cour 
les  a  renvoye  pardevant  le  juge  de  leur  district  p^  En  prendre  con- 
noissance. 

a  la  meme  Cour 
Entre  Louis  Gaud  demandeur  Contre  le  S^  thabault  reprsente 
par  Le  S^  Papin  deffendeur 
le  demandeur  requiere  par  sa  requete  presentee  cejourdhuy  a 
la  Cour  que  la  saisie  faite  de  Ses  Biens  meubles  pelterie  Effets  et 
immeubles  Soit  levees  par  le  tor  quelle  luy  Cause  dans  son  com- 
merce Et  lempeche  de  satisfaire  Ses  creanciers  de  meme  que  par 
le  manque  de  marchandises  que  le  S^  thabault  est  En  deffaud  de 
luy  fournir  suivant  sa  Convention.  Et  requiere  En  outre  que  le 
s^  thabault  soit  condamne  a  luy  payer  tous  des  domagement  de 
ladite  saisie  tor  retard  frais  Et  depens. 

oui  le  S''  papin  procureur  dud*  s^  thabault  qui  a  requis  a  la 
decizion  de  laffaire  soit  Renvoyee  pardevant  des  jures.  a  quoy 
est  intervenu  le  S^  laille  qui  Sest  opose  comme  interesse  a  ce 
que  ladite  affaire  soit  decide  par  jures  conjointement  avec  led* 


COURT  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1790        433 

At  Cahokia  December  7,  1789.     Signed,  Ant.  Girardin,  President. 

Received  the  present  writ  of  seizure,  Francois  Lapanc^. 

December  28.  Issued  a  summons  on  demand  of  the  widow 
Henry  Golding,  American,  against  Josiah  Ryan,  American  in- 
habitant, dwelling  at  the  Eagle  River,  to  appear  at  the  Court  of 
January  2,  1790,  to  answer  to  the  prayer  of  the  said  widow  for  the 
removal  of  her  goods  and  chattels,  which  the  said  Golding  has 
made. 

December  30.  Issued  a  summons  on  demand  of  Antoine 
Harmand  called  Sansfafon  against  William  Biggs,  American,  to 
appear  at  the  Court  of  January  2,  1790. 

January  2,  1790,  at  a  Court  held  by 
MM.  Antoine  Girardin.  Philippe  Engel. 

Charles  DuCharme.  Bte.  Dubuque. 

'  Pierre  Laperche. 
The  widow  Henry  Golding,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Josiah  Ryan,  Defen- 
dant. 
After  having  heard  the  parties  in  their  prayers  and  answers 
the  Court  dismissed  them  to  the  judge  of  their  district  who  will 
take  cognizance  thereof. 

At  the  same  Court. 
Louis  Gaud,  Plaintiff,  vs.  M.  Tabeau,  represented  by  M.  Pepin, 

Defendant. 

The  plaintifif  prays  in  his  petition,  presented  this  day  to  the 
Court,  that  the  seizure,  made  of  his  personal  property,  peltries, 
effects  and  real  estate,  be  raised  on  account  of  the  wrong,  which  it 
does  him  in  his  business  and  which  hinders  him  from  satisfying 
his  creditors,  and  also  on  account  of  the  failure  of  M.  Tabeau  to 
furnish  him  merchandise  in  accordance  with  his  agreement;  and 
he  prays,  fiurthermore,  that  M.  Tabeau  be  condemned  to  pay 
him  all  damages  from  tlie  said  seizure,  namely  for  wrong,  delay, 
costs  and  charges. 

Heard  M.  Pepin,  attorney  of  the  said  M.  Tabeau,  who  has 
required  that  the  decision  of  the  case  be  left  to  jurors;  in  which 
M.  Laille  has  intervened,  who  was  opposed,  as  interested  party, 


434  ILLINOJS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Louis  gault  qui  ont  requis  la  decizion  de  ladite  affaire  par  la  Cour 
Et  que  la  dite  saisie  Soit  levde.     Parties  ouyes. 

La  Cour  a  leve  Et  leve  toutes  saisies  faites  et  obtenues  par  le 
s^  thabault  sur  les  biens  meubles  Et  immeubles  pelteries  Et  autres 
Effets  dud*  Louis  Gault,  la  met  au  Neant  Et  Remet  led*  Louis 
Gault  pocession  de  tous  Ses  Biens  pelteries  marchandises  Et 
effets.  a  luy  En  joint  de  payer  primitivement  privilegierement  Et 
par  prefferance  a  ceux  de  la  Rive  espagnole  tous  les  Creanciers  de 
cette  Rive  qui  seront  privilegiez  aud*  S^  thabault  Et  Roubidoub  qui 
nauront  leur  privilege  quapres  les  dits  Creanciers  dicy  payez,  con- 
damne  la  dite  Cour  le  le  s^  thabault  a  Suporter  toutes  pertes  depens 
domages  qui  pouroit  etre  survenus  aux  pelteries  saisies  mise  En 
depot  ches  le  s^  izidore  laCroix,  le  condamne  pareillement  En 
tous  les  frais  depens  de  ladite  saisie  et  du  proces.  Et  le  S'"  Robi- 
doub  aux  frais  de  la  Saisie  par  luy  obtenue,  la  Cour  ayant  Et^ 
informee  que  le  s^  thabault  par  la  voye  du  S^  papin  avoit  Enlev^ 
des  huilles  Et  Graisses  saisies  malgre  la  deffances  a  luy  faites 
dans  les  saisies  pre[ce]dantes  Et  au  mepris  de  lautorite  de  la  Cour 
Les  avoir  transport^e  sur  la  Rive  Espagnole  ce  qui  sera  execute 

a*  Girardin 

Entre  M^  DeClamorgan  demandeur  Contre  Louis  Coste 
et  sa  femme  deffendeur  non  comparant  apres  assignation  a  eux 
donnee 

Vu  le  Billet  dud*  Coste  et  sa  femme  de  815  L  de  farine  Echus 
la  Cour  Les  condanne  a  payer  Et  aux  frais  Et  aux  frais  [sic] 
a*  girardin 

La  cour  est  ajournee  au  p^^  fevrier  1790 

a*  Girardin 


A  une  Cour  du  i^^  Fevrier  1790. 
M^*'  Antoine  girardin  Presidant        Philipe  angel 
B*^  dubuque  Charle  ducharme 

Ne  setant  presents  aucunne  cause  nous  avons  adjourn^  la 
cour  au  i^^  de  mars  prochain 

a*  Girardin 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1790  435 

to  having  the  case  decided  by  jurors,  as  was  also  the  said  Louis 
Gaud,  and  they  have  required  the  decision  of  the  said  case  by  the 
Court  and  prayed  that  the  said  seizure  be  raised.     Parties  heard. 

The  Court  has  raised  and  does  raise  all  seizures  made  and 
obtained  by  M.  Tabeau  on  the  personal  and  real  property,  pel- 
tries and  other  effects  of  the  said  Louis  Gaud  and  annuls  them; 
and  returns  to  the  said  Louis  Gaud  the  possession  of  all  his 
property,  peltries,  merchandise  and  effects;  and  has  commanded 
him  to  pay  first,  and  by  privilege  and  preference  to  those  of  the 
Spanish  bank,  all  the  creditors  of  this  bank  who  shall  be  privileged 
before  the  said  MM.  Tabeau  and  Robidou,  who  shall  have  their 
privileges  only  after  the  said  creditors  of  this  place  are  paid;  and 
the  said  Court  condemns  M.  Tabeau  to  bear  all  losses,  expenses 
and  damages  which  may  have  occurred  to  the  peltries  seized  and 
deposited  at  the  house  of  M.  Isidore  LaCroix ;  and  condemns  him 
likewise  in  all  costs  and  charges  of  the  said  seizure  and  suit,  and 
M.  Robidou  in  the  cost  of  the  seizure  obtained  by  him,  the  Court 
having  been  informed  that  M.  Tabeau  with  the  assistance  of  M. 
Pepin  had  carried  off  and  transported  to  the  Spanish  bank  some  oil 
and  grease,  which  was  seized,  in  spite  of  the  prohibition  made  to 
him  in  the  preceding  writ  of  seizure  and  in  defiance  of  the  authority 
of  the  Court;  for  which  there  will  be  execution. 

Ant.  Girardin. 
M.  Glamorgan,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Louis  Coste  and  his  wife,  defen- 
dant, not  appearing  after  summons  was  served  on  them. 

In  view  of  the  note  of  the  said  Coste  and  his  wife  for  815 
pounds  of  flour,  which  has  matured,  the  Court  condemns  them 
to  pay  it  with  the  costs  and  charges. 

Ant.  Girardin. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  February  i,  1790. 
At  a  Court  February  i,  1790. 
MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President.      Philippe  Engel. 
Bte.  Dubuque.  Charles  DuCharme. 

No  cause  having  been  presented,  we  adjourned  the  Court  to 
the  first  of  March  next. 

Ant.  Girardin. 


436  ILLINOIS^  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

A  une  Cour  Extraordinaire  Du  deux  fevrier  1790 
M'^  antoine  girardin  Presidant        B*^  dubuque 
Philipe  angel  Charle  ducharme 

Louis  Chatel 
La  cour  siegeante  Contre  le  S^  Jean  marie  Papin  citoyen 
de  la  Rive  espagnole  detenu  aux  fers  prisonnier  a  lagarde  de  thom 
bredy  Bailly  de  la  cour. 

Avons  fait  comparoitre  le  S'"  Louis  Lebrun  habitant  de  ce 
poste  lequel  apres  sermant  par  luy  fait  de  dire  la  verity  Sur  les 
Saints  Evangiles  luy  avons  demande  a  quel  dessein  le  s^  Papin 
avoit  Ete  ches  luy  le  dimanche  trois  de  Janvier  dernier. 

a  repondu  que  le  s^  Papin  avoit  Ete  ches  luy  ledit  jour  vant 
la  messe  luy  demander  sil  vouloit  luy  preter  sa  maison  pour 
faire  une  assemblee.  quil  avoit  une  requete  a  presenter  aux  habi- 
tans,  quil  vouloit  faire  cette  assemblee  pour  avoir  une  Cour  de 
jur^  pour  apeller  de  la  sentence  de  la  cour  Et  voir  Sil  pouvoit  se 
relever  de  son  affaire  qui  est  tout  ce  quil  a  dit  savoir  lecture  a  luy 
faite  de  Sa  deposition  a  dit  contenir  verity  y  a  persiste  a  dit  ne 
savoir  signer  Et  fait  sa  marque  ord^^. 

marque  +  de  sl^  Girardin 

Louis  Le  Brun 
Avons  fait  paroit^^  le  s^  Joseph  Lapensee  habitant  de  ce  village 
lequel  apres  sermant  par  luy  fait  sur  les  Saints  Evangiles  de  dire 
verite  luy  avons  demande  ce  que  le  s^"  Papin  luy  a  dit  lors  quil  a 
Ete  aujourdhuy  p'^  Larreter 

a  dit  quen  le  conduisant  en  prison  le  s^  Papin  luy  avoit  dit 
pourquoy  ont  ils  Employe  le  peuple  p^  mareter.  ils  ont  raison 
par  ce  que  si  setoit  des  magistra  je  ne  sait  pas  ce  quil  en  nauroit 
Ete  qui  est  tout  ce  quil  a  dit  savoir  lecture  a  luy  faite  de  sa  declar- 
ation a  dit  contenir  verite  y  a  persiste  Et  a  declare  ne  savoir  signer 
a  fait  sa  marque  ord^^ 

marque  a*  Girardin 

+ 
de  Joseph  Lapensde 

1  The  case  is  interesting,  when  it  is  remembered  that  the  Spanish  subjects  were  doing 
their  utmost  to  drive  the  French  from  the  American  Bottom.  Although  the  case  was  appar- 
ently based  on  a  commercial  transaction,  this  attempt  to  undermine  the  power  of  the  Court 
may  be  due  to  the  same  policy  pursued  by  the  Spanish  at  Kaskaskia.    See  Introdtiction,  p.  cxlii. 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1790       437 

At  a  special  session  of  the  Court,  February  2,  1790. 
MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President.      Charles  DuCharme. 
Philippe  Engel.  Louis  Chatel. 

Bte.  Dubuque. 
The  Court  in  session  vs.  M.  Jean  Marie  Pepin,  citizen  of  the 

Spanish  bank,  detained  in  irons  as  a  prisoner  in  the  custody 

of  Tom  Brady,  baihff  of  the  Court.  ^ 

We  have  summoned  M.  Louis  Lebrun,  inhabitant  of  this  post, 
of  whom,  after  oath  was  made  by  him  on  the  Holy  Gospels  to  tell 
the  truth,  we  demanded  for  what  purpose  M.  Pepin  had  been 
at  his  house  Sunday  the  third  of  January  last. 

He  answered  that  M.  Pepin  had  been  at  his  house  the  said 
day  before  mass  to  ask  him  if  he  would  lend  him  his  house  for 
the  purpose  of  holding  an  assembly;  that  he  had  a  petition  to 
present  to  the  inhabitants  and  that  he  wished  to  have  this  assem- 
bly in  order  to  have  a  court  of  jurors  so  that  he  could  appeal  from 
the  sentence  of  the  Court  and  see  if  he  could  not  obtain  relief  in 
his  affair;  which  is  all  that  he  said  he  knew.  Reading  was  made 
to  him  of  his  deposition  and  he  said  that  it  contained  the  truth 
and  persisted  therein;  and  he  said  that  he  did  not  know  how  to 
sign  and  has  made  his  mark. 
Mark  -j-  of 

Louis  Lebrun  Ant.  Girardin. 

We  have  summoned  M.  Joseph  Lapance,  inhabitant  of  this 
village,  of  whom,  after  oath  was  made  by  him  on  the  Holy  Gos- 
pels to  tell  the  truth,  we  demanded  what  M.  Pepin  said  to  him 
at  the  time  he  went  to-day  to  arrest  him. 

He  said  that  while  conducting  him  to  prison  M.  Pepin  had 
said  to  him:  "Why  have  they  employed  the  people  to  arrest 
me?  They  are  right,  because  if  it  had  been  magistrates,  I  do  not 
know  what  would  have  happened;"  which  is  all  that  he  said  that 
he  knew.  Reading  was  made  to  him  of  his  deposition  and  he  said 
that  it  contained  the  truth  and  persisted  therein;  and  he  said 
that  he  did  not  know  how  to  sign  and  has  made  his  mark. 
Ant.  Girardin  Mark  -|-  of 

of  Joseph  Lapanc^. 


438  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Ladite  cour  a  fait  comparoitre  En  la  Chambre  du  greffe  led*  S^ 
Papin,  lui  a  Et6  demande  par  M'"  Le  presidant  girardin  pour  quoy 
il  avoit  reparii  sur  cette  Rive  Et  En  ce  village  le  jour  de  hier  au 
mepris  des  deffences  au  mepris  des  deffences  [sic]  qui  luy  ont  Et6 
cy  devant  faites  sans  en  demander  une  permission  au  commandant 
de  ce  poste  ou  a  un  magistra  de  la  cour  tel  quil  luy  Et^  Enjoint 
par  notre  decret  du  quatre  Janvier  dernier  Et  pourquoy  il  avoit 
encore  paru  et  reste  deux  jours  la  semaine  pass^e  dans  ce  village 
centre  led*  decret. 

a  Et^  Longtems  Sans  repondre  Et  apr^s  Lavoir  somm^  de 
repondre  a  dit  quil  navoit  Rien  a  dire  que  ce  netoit  pas  icy  ou  il 
repondroit. 

Luy  a  Et^  demand^  pourquoy  il  a  dit  aujourdhuy  a  ceux 
qui  ont  Ete  pour  Larreter  quon  se  servoit  du  peuple  p'^  Larreter 
que  si  savoit  Ete  des  magistra  il  ne  se  seroit  pas  laisse  prendre  si 
facilement. 

a  dit  quil  navoit  Rien  de  repondre. 

La  Cour  ayant  murement  deliber^  Entrelle  a  declare  led*  s' 
Papin  Perturbateur  du  repos  public  En  ce  vilage  ateint  et  convaincu 
davoir  voulu  Exiter  une  sedition  contre  la  cour  Et  tenu  dans  ce  dit 
vilage  des  discours  Contrelle  tendant  a  menaces,  mepris  et  aten- 
tatoire  a  son  authorite  et  autres  propos  injurieux  pour  reparation 
de  quoy  ladite  Cour  le  Condamne  a  tenir  prison  aux  fers  a  la 
garde  du  Bailly  de  deux  miliciens  Et  dun  officier  de  milice  pen- 
dant cinq  jours  au  bout  du  quel  tems  sera  mis  dehor  de  la 
prison  et  conduit  par  la  garde  au  missisipy  Enjoint  a  luy  de 
traverser  sur  la  partie  Espagnole  et  de  ne  jamais  reparoitre 
En  ce  village  Et  dependances  de  ce  district  sans  une  permis- 
sion du  Commandant  de  ce  poste  ou  dun  magistra  a  peine  de 
punition  Corporelle  le  condamnons  En  outre  En  tous  les  frais 
de  lextraord^^  que  la  cour  a  liquidez  a  la  somme  de  quatre 
cent  quarante  livres  En  argt  suivant  le  compte  arrets  quil  payera 
Comptant  avant  de  sortir  de  prison  ce  qui  sera  execute  par 
privilege  Et  nonobstant  toute  representations,     donn^  Et  deli- 

1  The  decree  is  not  in  the  Record. 


COURT  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1790       439 

The  said  Court  summoned  to  the  chamber  of  the  clerk  the 
said  M.  Pepin  and  asked  him  through  M.  the  President  Girardin, 
why  he  had  reappeared  on  this  bank  and  in  this  village  yesterday 
in  defiance  of  the  prohibition  which  had  been  herebefore  made 
him,  without  asking  permission  therefor  from  the  commandant 
of  this  post  or  one  of  the  magistrates  of  the  Court,  as  he  was 
commanded  by  our  decree  of  the  fourth  of  January  last;  and 
why  he  had  again  appeared  and  remained  the  past  week  in  this 
village  contrary  to  this  decree.^ 

He  has  been  a  long  time  without  answering  and,  after 
having  summoned  him  to  answer,  he  has  said  that  he 
had  nothing  to  say,  that  it  was  not  here  where  he  would 
answer. 

It  was  asked  him  why  he  said  to-day  to  those  who  have  been 
to  arrest  him  that  they  made  use  of  the  people  to  arrest  him, 
that,  if  it  had  been  magistrates,  he  would  not  have  permitted  him- 
self to  be  taken  so  easily. 

He  said  that  he  had  nothing  to  answer. 

The  Court  having  carefully  deliberated  declared  the  said  M. 
Pepin  a  disturber  of  the  public  peace  in  this  village,  caught  and 
convicted  of  having  wished  to  excite  a  sedition  against  the  Court ; 
and  he  has  held  in  this  said  village  discourses  against  it,  leading 
to  menaces,  defiance  and  outrage  on  its  authority,  and  other 
injurious  talk;  for  reparation  of  which  the  said  Court  condemns 
him  to  be  held  in  prison  in  irons  under  the  custody  of  the  bailiff, 
two  militia-men  and  an  officer  of  the  militia  for  five  days;  at  the 
end  of  which  time  he  shall  be  placed  outside  of  the  prison  and 
conducted  by  the  guard  to  the  Mississippi,  and  commanded  to 
cross  to  the  Spanish  part  and  never  to  reappear  in  this  village  and 
the  dependencies  of  this  district,  without  a  permission  of  the  com- 
mandant of  this  post  or  of  a  magistrate,  on  pain  of  corporal  punish- 
ment. We  condemn  him  furthermore  in  all  the  costs  of  the  special 
session,  which  the  Court  fixes  at  the  sum  of  four  hundred  and 
forty  livres  in  money  according  to  the  account  drawn  up,  which  he 
shall  pay  before  leaving  prison,  for  which  there  will  be  execu- 
tion   by    privilege    and    notwithstanding    all     representations. 


440  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

here  par   la   dite   Cour  led*  jour  deux  fevrier  mil   sept   Cent 
quatre  vingt  dix, 
[Signed] 

DuCharme  Philipe  Engel 

Sa  Bte  Dubuque 

Louis  +  Chatel  a*  Girardin 

marque 

a  une  Cour  du  3.  mars  1790. 
M'^"  antoine  girardin  Presidant  B*®  dubuque 
Philipe  angel  P^^  Laperche 

Charles  ducharme  Louis  Chatel 

Mr  aRundel  Negociant  a  fait  comparoitre  michel  peltier  pour 
luy  payer  la  somme  de  quarante  quatre  livres  En  argent  par 
son  compte  apres  luy  avoir  demande. 

Led*  michel  Peltier  a  repliqu^  que  M'"  Rondel  luy  avoit  dit 
quil  ne  le  presseroit  pas  Et  quil  ne  Croyoit  pas  quil  le  forceroit  a 
le  payer  presentement  quil  Etoit  surpris  quil  luy  envoyoit  une 
assignation  quil  sen  Etoit  Raporte  a  sa  parole. 

a  quoy  le  s^  Rondel  a  repondu  quil  avoit  Ete  ches  luy  demander 
son  payement  Et  quil  Etoit  sur  son  depart  quil  avoit  Besoin  de 
son  argent  quil  ne  se  souvenoit  aucunement  de  luy  avoir  dit  quil 
luy  donneroit  du  terns. 

La  Cour  condamne  led*  michel  Peltier  antaya  a  payer  comp- 
tant  et  sans  delais  son  Compte  de  quarante  quatre  livres.  Et 
condamne  le  S'"  arundel  aux  frais  sur  ce  quil  est  Convenu  de  ne 
pas  presser  led*  antaya  Et  quil  a  declare  ne  pas  sen  souvenir  led* 
antaya  ofrant  des  preuves,  a  quoy  le  S^  Rondel  sest  soumis  p^ 
lesd*  frais  ce  qui  sera  execute. 

a  le  Meme  Cour 
M^  Rondel  Contre  Joseph  Cecire. 
M^  Rondel  demande  aud*  Cecire  un  Compte  de  la  somme  de 
trente  livres  par  son  Compte  ce  que  led*  Cecire  Est  Convent 
mais  quil  ne  pouvoit  payer  par  ce  que  Ion  ne  le  payoit  pas  surquoy 
la  Cour  Condamne  led*  Cecire  a  payer  au  s^  aRundel  sans  delais 
Et  aux  frais  Et  depens. 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1790  441 

Given  and  determined  by  the  said  Court  the  said  day,  Feb- 
ruary 2,  1790. 

[Signed]      DuCharme.  Philippe  Engel. 

His  Bte.  Dubuque. 

Louis  +  Chatel  Ant  Girardin. 
mark 

At  a  Court,  March  3,  1790. 
MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President.      Bte.  Dubuque. 
Philippe  Engel.  Pierre  Laperche. 

Charles  DuCharme.  Louis  Chatel. 

M.  Arundel,  merchant,  summoned  Michel  Pelletier  to  pay  him 
the  sum  of  forty-four  livres  in  money  according  to  his  account, 
after  having  demanded  it  of  him. 

The  said  Michel  Pelletier  replied  that  M.  Arundel  had  told  him 
that  he  would  not  press  him  and  that  he  did  not  believe  that  he 
would  compel  him  to  pay  now ;  that  he  was  surprised  that  he  sent 
him  a  summons,  that  he  had  relied  on  his  word. 

To  which  M.  Arundel  answered  that  he  had  been  to  his  house 
to  demand  of  him  his  payment;  and  that  he  was  about  to  leave; 
that  he  had  need  of  his  money;  that  he  did  not  remember  at  all 
having  said  to  him  that  he  would  give  him  time. 

The  Court  condemned  the  said  Michel  Pelletier  Antaya  to  pay 
in  cash  and  without  delay  his  account  of  forty-four  livres;  and  con- 
demns M.  Arundel  to  pay  the  costs,  because  he  agreed  not  to 
press  the  said  Antaya  and  has  declared  that  he  did  not  recollect 
it,  when  the  said  Antaya  offered  proofs,  whereon  M.  Arundel 
has  submitted  for  the  payment  of  the  said  costs,  for  which  there 
will  be  execution.  I 

At  the  Same  Court. 
M.  Arundel  vs.  Joseph  Cesirre. 
M.  Arundel  sues  the  said  Cesirre  for  an  account  of  the  sum  of 
thirty  livres  according  to  his  account  to  which  the  said  Cesirre 
agreed;  but  which  he  does  not  pay,  because  some  one  does  not 
pay  him.  Whereupon  the  Court  condemns  the  said  Cesirre  to  pay 
to  M.  Arundel  without  delay  and  to  pay  the  costs  and  charges. 


442  ILLINOIS  giSTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Mr  Rundel  demandeur  Centre  janot  lapensee  defandeur  nay- 
ant  voulu  paroitre  et  apr^s  avoir  Ete  apelld  par  trois  fois  a  la 
porte  de  Laudience  assignation  luy  a3^ant  Ete  donn^e  par 
Ihuissier  de  la  Cour  le  Jour  de  hier. 

Le  demandeur  demande  aud^  lapensee  le  payement  de  son 
compte  p'"  fourniture  de  marchandises  montant  a  la  somme  de 
Cent  soixante  onze  livres  atendti  son  depart  p^  la  prairie  du  Chien 
ne  pouvant  atendre  plus  longtems. 

La  Cour  vu  le  refus  dud*  deffendeur  de  paroitre  apres  assigna- 
tion a  luy  donn^e.  la  dite  Cour  le  Condamne  a  payer  sans  delais  son 
dit  Compte  montant  a  Cent  soixante  onze  livres  et  aux  frais  et 
depens. 

FRANCOIS  TURGEON  demandeur  Contre  le  fevre  forgeron  nayant 
voulu  paroitre  apres  assignation  a  luy  donnee  Et  apelle  par 
trois  Cris  a  la  porte  de  laudience  le  s^  Chatel  comparant  p^ 
luy. 

Le  demandeur  demande  au  deffendeur  le  payement  de  son 
salaire  p^  fauchage  de  foin  montant  a  la  s®  de  soixante  une  livres 
sur  quoy  le  s^  Chatel  a  dit  que  le  s^  Lefevre  luy  avoit  dit  quil  ne 
luy  devoit  que  quarante  neuf  livres  sur  quoy  la  Cour  a  condamne 
le  deffendeur  a  payer  sans  delais  ce  quil  doit  aud*  turgeon  mon- 
tant a  soixante  une  livres  et  aux  frais  Et  depens  ce  qui  sera 
Execute. 

ANTOINE  HARMAND  dit  SANS  FACON  demandeur  Contre  M^  jean 
DUMOULIN  deffendeur 
Le  demendeur  demande  au  deffendeur  une  paire  de  Boeuf  quil 
luy  a  vendu  p^  la  somme  de  550^^  Et  une  paire  de  Soulier  luy  ayant 
Consenty  son  billet  de  pareille  somme  pour  payer  dans  le  mois  de 
ybre  prochain  En  farine  au  prix  du  Cour  les  quels  Boeuf  led*  s^ 
dumoulin  sest  oblige  verbalement  de  luy  livrer  a  sa  demande  quil 
requeroit  sur  le  refus  de  M'^  dumoulin  que  la  Cour  loblige  a  luy 
livrer  lesd*  Boeuf  M^  dumoulin  a  repondu  quil  offroit  de  livrer 
lesd*  Boeuf  quil  reconnissoit  les  avoit  vendu  mais  que  par  megarde 
le  billet  du  s^  sans  facon  Etoit  dechir6  quil  luy  en  avoit  represent^ 
les  morceau  quil  avoit  Reconnu  quil  demandoit  avant  de  luy 
livrer  les  Boeuf  quil  luy  donna  un  Caution  p^  payer  aud*  tems  et 


COURT  RECORD,  MARCH,  1790  443 

M.  Arundel,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Janot  Lapance,  Defendant,  who  has 

been  unwilling  to  appear,  after  having  been  called  three  times 

at  the  door  of  the  audience  chamber,  the  summons  having 

been  served  on  him  yesterday  by  the  huissier  of  the  Court. 

The  plaintiff  demands  of  the  said  Lapance  the  payment  of 

his  account  for  supplies  of  merchandise  amounting  to  the  sum 

of  one  hundred  and  seventy-one  livres,  because  of  his  departure  for 

Prairie  du  Chien,  and  since  he  cannot  wait  longer. 

In  view  of  the  refusal  of  the  said  defendant  to  appear  after 

summons  was  given  to  him,  the  said  Court  condemns  him  to  pay 

without  delay  his  said  account,  amounting  to  the  sum  of  one 

hundred  and  seventy-one  livres  and  to  pay  the  costs  and  charges. 

Francois  Turgeon,   Plaintiff,  vs.  Lefevre,  smith,  who  has 

not  wished  to  appear  after  summons  was  given  him,  and  he 

was  called  three  times  at  the  door  of  the  audience  chamber  and 

M.  Chatel  appeared  for  him. 

The  plaintiff  demands  of  the  defendant  the  payment  of  his 
wages  for  mowing  grass,  which  amount  to  the  sum  of  sixty-one 
livres.  Whereupon  M.  Chatel  said  that  M.  Lefevre  had  told  him 
that  he  owed  the  plaintiff  only  forty-nine  livres.  Whereupon  the 
Court  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay  without  delay  what  he 
owed  the  said  Turgeon,  amounting  to  sixty-one  livres  and  to  pay 
the  costs  and  charges,  for  which  there  will  be  execution. 
Antoine  Harmand  called  Sansfajon,  Plaintiff,  vs.  M.  Jean 
DuMOULiN,  Defendant. 
The  plaintiff  demands  of  the  defendant  a  pair  of  oxen  which  he 
sold  to  him  for  the  sum  of  550  livres  and  a  pair  of  shoes,  having 
accepted  from  him  his  note  of  like  sum  payable  in  the  month  of 
September  next  in  flour  at  the  price  current ;  which  oxen  the  said 
M.  Dumoulin  bound  himself  verbally  to  deliver  to  him  on  demand. 
He  prayed,  on  the  refusal  of  M.  Dumoulin,  that  the  Court  compel 
the  latter  to  deliver  to  him  the  said  oxen.  M.  Dumoulin  an- 
swered that  he  offered  to  deliver  the  said  oxen  and  that  he  ac- 
knowledged that  he  had  sold  them,  but  that  by  inadvertance  the 
note  of  M.  Sansfajon  was  torn ;  that  he  had  shown  the  pieces  of  it  to 
him;  that  Harmand  acknowledged  that  he,  Dumoulin,  demanded, 


444  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

quil  luy  Consenty  un  autre  billet  a  la  place  de  celuy  qui  Etoit  de- 
chire  par  inadvertance.  vu  aussi  la  declaration  de  M'^  aRundel 
Et  izidore  laCroix  temoins  aux  conventions  des  parties.  La  Cour 
ordonne  aud*  antoine  harmand  de  fournir  un  Caution  au  s^ 
dumoulin  avant  de  luy  livrer  lesd*  Boeuf  Et  de  luy  refaire  un 
autre  Billet  En  place  de  celuy  dechire  Et  a  defaud  par  led*  s'" 
harmand  de  ce  faire  sous  huit  jours  le  marche  sera  de  nule  valeur 
Et  En  satisfaisant  a  la  presente  sentence  ordonne  au  s^  dumoulin 
de  livrer  lesd*  Boeuf  condamne  led*  harmand  aux  frais. 
La  cour  est  ajournee  au  1^^  avril  prochain. 

a*  girardin. 


A  une  Cour  du  premier  avril  mil  sept  Cent  quatre  vingt  dix. 

M''''  antoine  Girardin  Presidant  Charle  ducharme 
Philipe  angel  Louis  Chatel 

Le  S'"  Layle  marchand  de  Canada  demandeur  Contre  Francois 
LAPENSEE  deffendeur. 

Le  demandeur  demande  au  deflfendeur  la  quantite  de  298^} 
de  farine  ou  en  argent  119^^  10*  quil  lui  doit  par  son  Billet  Echu 
Et  aux  frais  et  depens  oui  le  S^  Lapensee  qui  a  reconnu  devoir 
ladite  Somme  et  quil  na  pas  refuse  le  payment  au  demandeur. 
Et  quil  offroit  Encore  de  payer,  oui  aussi  led*  demandeur  qui 
a  dit  quil  avoit  demande  nombre  de  fois  Son  payement  aud* 
deffendeur  Et  quil  lavoit  toujour  remis  de  jour  En  jour  jusqua 
aujourdhuy. 

La  cour  par  deliberation  a  Condamne  le  deffendeur  a  payer 
sans  delais  son  Billet  En  farine  ou  argent  Contant  Et  sans  delais 
montant  a  298^}  de  farine  ou  119^^.  10^  En  argent  et  aux  frais 
et  depens.  ce  qui  sera  execute 

a  la  meme  cour 
le  Nomme  Wadel  demandeur  Contre  pierre  Lafleur  deffen- 
deur. 

Le  demandeur  a  expose  a  la  Cour  quil  avoit  achete  une  vache 
pleine  du  S^  Lafleur  p^  quinze  minots  de  mahis  Et  Cent  livres 
de  Lard  moyennant  qui  ce  seroit  une  Bonne  vache  laitiere   Et 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1790  445 

before  delivering  the  oxen  to  him,  that  he  give  surety  that  he 
would  pay  at  the  said  time  and  that  he  make  another  note  in 
place  of  that  which  was  torn  by  inadvertence.  In  view  also  of  the 
affidavits  of  MM.  Arundel  and  Isidore  LaCroix,  witnesses  of  the 
conventions  of  the  parties,  the  Court  decrees  that  the  said  Antoine 
Harmand  furnish  surety  to  M.  Dumoulin,  before  the  latter  delivers 
to  him  the  said  oxen,  and  make  another  note  in  place  of  the  torn 
one;  and  in  default  by  the  said  M.  Antoine  Harmand  to  do  this 
within  a  week,  the  bargain  shall  be  null;  and  if  he  satisfies  the 
present  decree,  the  Court  orders  M.  Dumoulin  to  deliver  the  said 
oxen ;  and  condemns  the  said  Harmand  to  pay  the  costs. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  first  of  April  next. 

Ant.  Girardin. 
At  a  Court,  April  i,  1790. 

MM.  Antoine  Girardin,  President.     Charles  DuCharme. 
Philippe  Engel.  Louis  Chatel. 

M.    Layle,    trader  from  Canada,   Plaintiff,  vs.  Francois   La- 
PANCE,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  demands  of  the  defendant  the  quantity  of  298! 
lbs.  of  flour  or  119  livres  10  sols  in  money,  which  he  owes  him  on 
his  note,  and  costs  and  charges.  Heard  M.  Lapance  who  acknowl- 
edged that  he  owed  the  said  sum  and  said  that  he  did  not  refuse 
the  payment  to  the  plaintiff  and  offered  still  to  pay  it.  Heard  also 
the  said  plaintiff,  who  said  that  he  had  demanded  a  number  of 
times  his  payment  of  the  said  defendant  and  that  he  had  always 
put  him  off  from  day  to  day  until  to-day. 

The  Court,  on  deliberation,  condemned  the  defendant  to  pay 
without  delay  his  money  in  flour  or  money,  amounting  to  298  jibs, 
of  flour  or  119  livres  10  sols  in  money,  and  to  pay  the  costs  and 
charges  for  which  there  will  be  execution. 

At  the  same  Court. 
The  named  Waddell,  Plaintiff,  vs.  Pierre  Lafleur,  Defendant. 

The  plaintiff  sets  forth  to  the  Court  that  he  had  bought  a  cow 
with  calf  for  fifteen  minots  of  corn  and  a  hundred  pounds  of  bacon 
with  the  understanding  that  it  was  a  good  milk  cow  and  without 
fault;  and  that  he  had  taken  the  cow  to  Grand  Ruisseau;  but  that, 


446  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

• 

sans  deffaud  Et  quil  avoit  Emmene  la  vache  au  grand  Ruisseau 
mais  quetant  velee  Elle  navoit  pii  nourir  son  veau  Et  quil  Etoit 
mort  la  mere  n'ayant  pii  nourir  que  de  plus  il  setoit  apercu  que 
ladite  vache  navoit  que  deux  trions  que  les  deux  autres  Etoient 
Sees,  quil  avoit  fait  son  payement  aud^  s^  Lafleur.  quil  Reque- 
roit  que  le  S^  Lafleur  luy  remete  une  autre  vache  prete  a  veler 
Bonne  Et  sans  deffaut.  ou  luy  remetre  son  payement  et  aux  frais 
et  depens  que  dailleur  il  ne  Croyoit  pas  que  ce  fut  la  meme  vache 
que  le  deffendeur  luy  avoit  propose. 

oui  led*  S^  Lafleur  deffendeur  qui  a  dit  quil  avoit  vendti 
ladite  vache  aud*  Wadel  En  presence  de  M^  schemitz  Et  de  meu- 
nier  qui  a  Servy  dinterprete,  quil  la  averti  de  la  visiter  et  que  si 
elle  ne  luy  Convenoit  pas  de  la  Laisser  Et  de  ne  pas  lammener 
quil  ne  vouloit  point  de  reproches.  que  le  S^  schemitz  lavoit 
visitee  que  vadel  Lavoit  visitee  Et  quil  sen  Etoit  trouv^  Con- 
tant  Et  luy  avoit  mis  une  Corde  dans  les  cornes  et  Lavoit  Em- 
men^e. 

En  concequance  avons  fait  faire  sermant  sur  les  Saints  Evan- 
giles  au  S^  schemitz  achison  qui  ont  dit  etre  present  Et  qui 
ont  Explique  a  la  Cour  Les  memes  dires  du  demandeur.  Vti 
aussi  le  Certifficat  du  Nomme  meunier  qui  a  Servy  dinterprete 
aud*  marche  et  visite  de  ladite  vache  cy  joint  et  sermante  devant 
deux  magistrats  de  la  Cour,  donne  a  cause  de  son  depart  led^ 
certiflicat  En  faveur  de  s^  Lafleur.  Le  tout  examine  la  Cour  a 
renvoye  les  parties  a  la  prochaine  Cour  jusques  a  larivde  du 
Nommd  meunier  qui  a  servi  dinterprete  Et  de  temoins.  y  ayant 
contrariete  de  deposition  Entre  les  deux  temoins  de  Wadel  et  de 
lafleur. 

La  Cour  est  ajournee  au  i^^  may  prochain. 

A*  Girardin 

1  The  Court  never  met  again,  for  on  the  27th  of  the  month  Governor  St.  Clair  established 
the  county  of  St.  Clair.  Thus  after  eleven  years  of  existence  the  Court  founded  by  Jo^jCi 
Todd  came  to^an  end.  —  Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii,  165. 


COURT  RECORD,  APRIL,  1790  447 

after  calving,  she  could  not  nourish  her  calf  not  being  able  to 
suckle  it,  and  it  was  dead;  that,  moreover,  he  noticed  that  the 
said  cow  had  only  two  teats,  the  other  two  being  dry ;  that  he 
had  made  his  payment  to  the  said  Lafleur  and  that  he  prayed 
that  M.  Lafleur  give  him  another  cow  ready  to  calve,  good  and 
without  fault,  or  return  to  him  his  payment,  and  pay  the  costs 
and  charges;  that  besides  he  did  not  believe  that  it  was  the  same 
cow  which  the  defendant  had  offered. 

Heard  the  said  M.  Lafleur,  defendant,  who  said  that  he  had 
sold  the  said  cow  to  the  said  Waddell  in  the  presence  of  M.  Smith 
and  of  Meunier  who  acted  as  interpreter;  that  he  warned  him  to 
examine  her  and  if  she  did  not  suit  to  leave  her  and  not  to  take 
her  away,  that  he  did  not  wish  reproaches;  that  M.  Smith  had 
examined  her,  that  Waddell  had  examined  her  and  that  he  was 
satisfied  with  her,  had  put  a  rope  on  her  horns  and  led  her  away. 

In  consequence  we  have  caused  MM.  Smith  and  Atchison,  to 
make  oath  on  the  Holy  Gospels  and  they  have  said  that  they  were 
present  and  declared  to  the  Court  the  same  as  the  plaintiff.  In 
view  also  of  the  certificate  of  the  named  Meunier,  who  acted  as 
interpreter  for  the  said  bargain  and  examination  of  the  said  cow, 
herewith  joined  and  sworn  to  before  two  magistrates  of  the  Court 
and  given  because  of  his  departure,  the  said  certificate  being  in 
favour  of  M.  Lafleur,  and  after  all  was  examined,  the  Court  dis- 
missed the  parties  to  the  next  Court  until  the  arrival  of  the  named 
Meunier  who  acted  as  interpreter  and  witness,  since  there  is  a  con- 
tradiction between  the  testimony  of  the  two  witnesses  of  Waddell 
and  that  of  Lafleur. 

The  Court  adjourned  to  the  first  of  May  next.^ 

Ant.  Girardin. 


EXTRAITS    DES   REGISTRES   DE  LA   JURISDICTION 
DES   CAHOKIAS. 

Enprese [Over  a  third  oj  the  leaf  torn  off.] 

Etleque  aux  Sieur 

Livre  de  compte  obligation 

les  Ilinois  et  ce  an  Consideration 

me  faira  le  plaisire  de  donne  soixa ...'...  .a  leglise 

dire  Cent  une  messe  et  deux  Service  a de  mor  en  foy 

je  luy  donne  le  present  pour  luy  Servire  aux  Besoin  sans  que  ne 
puis  linquitter  ne  Sachan  Signe  apres  lecture  faite  je  ay  fait  ma 
marque  a  St  Louis  le  28  may  1773. 

P  Chanarde  (signe)  marque  +  de  maroy 

temoin  Blondeau  tem 

L'an  Mil  Sept  Cent  Soixant  quatorze  le  vingt  deux  de  No- 
vember, fut  Present  le  Sieur  Charle  Marois  pardevant  nous  dit 
notaire  que  la  Presente  donnation  qu'il  a  faite  en  faveur  de  Clem- 
[ent]  L'anglois  est  Sa  mesme  tenneur  en  cas  de  mort,  et  faire  dire; 
de  plus  Cinquant  maisse  Basse  pour  le  Repost  des  ames  du  pere 
et  de  la  mere  du  dit  Marois  aux  Caokias  Les  jour  et  an  susdit. 
pd  signe  +  Marque  de  Charles  Marois 

Senet   No^^ 

Vu  et  approuve  le  testament  en  L 'autre  Part  donnons  pou- 
voir  au  Sieur  L'anglois  de  le  mettre  en  Execution  pourvu  qu'il 
acquite  toutes  les  dettes  du  Dejede  Donne  au  Kahos  a  8*^  Sep^® 
1778.  Signe         G.  R    Clark 

Kahos  this  i2*^Dec^  1778 

True  Copy  of  the  orginal 

Richard  McCarty  P  N 

1  Cahokia  record  in  the  courthouse  of  St.  Clair  County,  111.  It  was  originally  bound  in  a 
flexible  paper  cover,  but  is  now  bound  in  old  parchment  covers  and  the  whole  bound  again 
in  stiff  covers.  The  size  of  the  paper  is  15  by  gi  inches.  There  are  58  pages,  four  of  which 
are  blank.  They  are  numbered  Folio  5,  etc.  Evidently  one  page  is  missing  at  the  beginning. 
The  writers  are  the  successive  notary-clerks  of  the  Court,  who  generally  signed  themselves  as 
notaries,  although  most  of  the  entries  are  such  as  French  law  required  to  be  registered  by  the 

448 


EXTRACT   OF   THE   REGISTERS   OF   THE   MAGIS- 
TRACY  OF   CAHOKIA.i 

In  presence [Over  a  third  of  the  leaf  torn  off.] 

and  bequeath  to  M 

account  book,  note     . . . : 

the  lUinois  and  this  in  consideration     

will  give  me  pleasure  to  give  sixty     to  the  church .... 

to  say  one  hundred  and  one  masses  and  two  services  to ....  of  dead. 
In  faith  [of  which]  I  give  him  the  present  to  serve  him  in  case  of 

need  without  that cannot  disturb  him.     Not  knowing  how 

to  sign,  after  reading  made,  I  have  made  my  mark  at  St.  Louis, 
May  28,  1773.  signed,     Mark  -(-  of  Marois. 

P.  Chanarde,  Witness.  Blondeau,  Witness. 

The  twenty  second  day  of  November  of  the  year  one  thousand 
seven  hundred  and  seventy-four  was  present  before  us,  said  notary, 
M.  Charles  Marois,  who  declared  that  the  present  donation,  which 
he  has  made  in  favor  of  Clement  Langlois  is  his  last  wish  in  case  of 
death ;  and  that  he  wished  to  have  said  furthermore  fifty  low  masses 
for  the  repose  of  the  souls  of  the  father  and  mother  of  the  said 
Marois.     At  Cahokia  the  day  and  year  aforesaid.      signed 

+   Mark  of  Charles  Marois. 

Senet,  Notary. 

Seen  and  approved  the  testament  on  the  other  part  and  we 
give  power  to  M.  Langlois  to  put  it  in  execution,  provided  he  pays 
all  the  debts  of  the  deceased.  Given  at  Cahokia,  September  8, 
1778.  Signed,  G.  R.  Clark. 

Cahokia  this  12th  of  December,  1778. 
True  copy  of  the  original, 
Richard  McCarty,  P.  N. 

clerk,  which  title  should  have  been  used  in  the  majority  of  cases.  The  book  corresponds  to 
the  record  of  the  modern  recorder,  but  since  there  are  entries  of  acts  which  are  not  purely 
legal  instruments,  the  word  jurisdiction  has  been  translated  by  magistracy.  The  transcrip- 
tion is  by  the  editor. 

449 


450 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


[Reverse  of  torn  leaf] able 

on  bien  da. . . . 

en  Date  28^^  d. . 

le  22"^  de  Novembre .... 

par  le  Commandant  de . . . . 

jour  de  September  1778. 

Peletries 

nque  Barricque  de  Taffia  a  la 

....  Douze  Cent  Cinquant  Livre  en  Peletries 

. .  nviroin  quarant  Livre  de  mauvais  poudua 

feu  a  Quarant  Livres  en  Peletries 

Item  trois  case  de  Savon  de  f ranee  a  quatrvingt  dix 

Livres  en  Peletries 
Item  Deux  Cent  quatrevingt  Livre  de  peau  de  chev- 

reuil 
Estemer  une  Grand  et  une  petit  marmitte  a  vingt  Six 

Livres  en  Peletries 
Item  un  Cruche  et  un  mechant  prelat  a  quinze 

Livre 
Item  deux  fuzil  fin  a  Soixant  quinze  Livre 
Item  trent  neuf  aun  Gros  Brin  a  trent  sols  L'aune 
Item  deux  mals  une  neuf  et  I'autre  vieux  a  vingt 

trois  livre 
Item  treze  mouchoir  rouge  mais  petit  a  Cinquant 

sols  p^  mouchoir 
Item  une  Chapeau  avec  une  Loupe  et  Button  dore 

a  quinze  livres 
Item  une  CuUotte  et  une  veste  de  Drouguette  de 

soye  a  Trent  Livres 
Item  une  Vielle  vest  d'lndienne  et  une  jillet  de  taf- 

ata  a  trois  Livre 
Item  une  vest  et  un  CuUot  de  rats  de  Castore  a 

quinze  Livres 
Item  une  Veste  de  drap  Brun  a  Beuillain  de  velour 
noir  a  Douze  Livres 


[  1250^^ " 

(( 

t    40 

(( 

(( 

1    90 

<( 

u 

I  280 

<( 

(( 

I     26 

u 

<( 

•     15 

u 

u 

75 

n 

(( 

58.. 

10 

u 

( •' 

i( 

n 

\  " 

10 

11 

\  - 

(( 

ii 

■      30 

u 

ii 

[  ' 

u 

u 

I  ■= 

11 

li 

[  [1=] 

11 

a 

CLERK'S  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1778  451 

[Reverse  oj  torn  leaf]   able 

well 

under  date  of  28, . . 

the  22nd  of  November .... 

by  the  commandant  of 

day  of  September,  1778. 

Peltries 

casks  of  tafia  at  the  )  livres  sols  de 

twelve  hundred  and  fifty  livres  in  peltries. 


)  livres 
(1250 


((     (I 


,  about  forty  pounds  of  poor  gun  powder  at  forty  I 
livres  in  peltries. 


y     40 


H  It 


<<      (( 


ii         u 


li      (( 


il         (C 


Item,  three  cases  of  French  soap  at  nine  livres  in  ) 

peltries.  ) 

Item,  two  hundred  and  eighty  pounds  of  deer-skin.       280 
Appraised  a  large  and  a  small  saucepan  at  twenty-  j        . 

six  livres  in  peltries.  i 

Item,  one   pitcher  and   one  tarpaulin  at  fifteen  ) 

livres.  ) 

Item,  two  good  guns  at  seventy-five  livres.  75 

Item,  thirty-nine  ells  of  coarse  hemp  [rope?]   at)      rc  tq     " 

thirty  sols  the  ell.  ) 

Item,  two  trunks,  one  new  and  the  other  (»ld,  at  |  «'    u 

twenty- three  livres.  ) 

Item,  thirteen  handkerchiefs,  red  but  small,  at  fifty  |  « 

f     32    10 

sols  per  handkerchief.  v 

Item,  one  hat  with  ornament  and  gold  button  at  fif-  )  «    u 

teen  livres.  ) 

Item,  one  pair  of  breeches  and  one  vest  with  silk  ) 


il     (( 


drugget  at  thirty  livres. 
Item,  one  old  vest  of  printed  calico  and  one  tafeta  ) 

waistcoat  at  three  livres.  ) 

Item,  one  vest  and  one  pair  of  breeches  of  beaver  ) 


it    (( 
at  fifteen  livres. 
Item,   one   vest  of  brown  cloth  a  Beuillain[?]  of 
black  velvet  at  twelve  livres. 


12     "    " 


452 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


Item  un  Capeaut  de  Cade  Brun  et  un  Jillet  noir 
tous  les  deux  Vieu  a  Sept  Livre 

Transporte  a  1 'autre  pa[rt] 


[L1972] 


(Folio  3  Kahds  1778-) 


Peletries 
L  1972   "  " 
12     "  '' 


12 


12 


Suitte  de  Lautre  part 
Un  Vest  de  Taffita  Vert  a  douze  livre      cy 
Item  un  Capot  de  Cade  avec  de  parament  de  Ve-      ) 

lour  de  Cramoiser  a  douze  Livres  ) 

Item  une  Habit  &  une  Culot  de  Taffata  de  Coleur  | 

du  Cendre  tous  les  deux  vieux  f 

Item  deux  Coupon  d'une  p^  de  p*"  du  Rubon  et  deux  ^ 

Livre  de  files  de  Eppinette  a  douze  Livres  f 

Item  deux  p^  de  Bas  de  Soyes  a  demie  use  a  la  ) 

some  de  Douze  Livre  ) 

Item  deux  mouchoir  demie  user  avec  deux  drap  de  | 

Beaufort  de  quatre  aun  vieu  a  dix  huit  Livre        f 
Item  une  petit  miroire  une  Boucle  ou  Savonette  une 

petit  pot  avec  d'pomade  deux   douzaine  petit 

Boutton  a  diamond  et  un  p^  de  Boucle  de  jarri- 

tiere  d'argent  a  six  Livres  J 

Item  six  aun  de  polonaise  rouge  a  Six  Livre  p^  aun 
Item  Quatre  Sac  de  grose  toil  a  Six  Livre 
Item  une  Faulx  une  Pistolet  un  sortin  une  Goblet 

de  Cristal  et  enviroin  huit  Livre  de  Savon  tous 

a  vingt  Livres 
Item  deux  Terreine  &  un  Serotte  a  Trois  Livre 
Item  une  Bodette  une  mattalass  une  Petit  lit  de 

plume  une  vielle  Casette  une  vielle  Castete  et 

une  Gratte  a  Trente  trois  Livres 

Montant  en  Peletries  L  2147 


36 


20 


33 


1  At  first  the  pages  are  numbered  folio,  and  later  alternately  folio  and  reverso,  which  is  the 
correct  form. 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1778 


453 


Item,  one  cloak  of  brown  cade[?]  and  one  black 
waistcoat,  both  old,  at  seven  livres. 

Carried  forward.  L  1972 


(Folio  3.  Cahokia  1778)1 


Brought  forward 
One  vest  of.  green  tafeta  at  twelve  livres 
Item,  one  cloak  of  cade  [  ?]  with  trimmings  of  crim-  j 

son  velvet  at  twelve  livres.  ) 

Item,  one  coat  and  one  pair  of  breeches  of  ash  color,  ) 

both  old.  1 

Item,  two  remnants  of  [ ?]  ribbon   and  two    j 

pounds  of  spinet  strings  at  twelve  livres.  ) 

Item,  two  pair  of  silk  stockings,  partly  worn,  at  the  [ 

sum  of  twelve  livres.  \ 

Item,  two  handkerchiefs,  half  used,  with  two  Beau-  ) 

fort  sheets  of  four  ells,  old,  at  eighteen  livres.    \ 
Item,  one  little  mirror,  a  buckle,  a  soap  ball,  a  lit-  ^ 

tie  jar  with  pomade,  two  dozen  little  diamond  ! 

buttons  and  one  pair  of  silver  garter  buckles,  at  | 

six  livres.  ^ 

Item,  six  ells  of  red  polonaise  at  six  livres  an  ell 
Item,  four  coarse  cloth  sacks  at  six  livres. 
Item,  a  scythe,  a  pistol,  a  sortin,  [  ?]  a  glass  goblet  \ 

and  about  eight  pounds  of  soap,  all  at  twenty  V 

livres.  ) 

Item,   two  earthen  jugs^  and  a  serotte  [  ?]  at  three  ) 

livres.  ) 

Item,  one  strap  bed,  one  mattress,  a  little  feather  ) 

bed,  one  old  casket,  one  old  tomahawk  and  a  > 

scraper  at  thirty-three  livres.  ) 


Peltries 
L  1972     * 
12     ' 


12 


12 


18 


36 
6 

20 


2,Z 


Amounting  in  peltries  L  2147     '*     " 

^  Terreine  is  the  name  given  earthen  jugs  used  for  clarifying  the  river  water. 


454  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Etats  de  Billiets  due  et  par  que  Due 

Item  par  la  [sic]  Sieur  Honore 60    "  '' 

p^  le  S^  Durand  Neg* 27.10    " 

p  une  mandat  de  S^  Jo''  allarie    15     "  " 

p^  Jo^  Lambert 150.10    " 

p^  LeBeau  DeChene    82.10    " 

p^  L  S'*  Valle  Chasseur   103     "  " 

p^  Le  Petit  Baribeau   310    "  " 

p^  2  Billet  de  S^  michot  Placette      239.17.6 

p^  L  S'"  Lepierre 304     "  " 

p'-  P  S^  Bapt  allary 48.5      " 

p^  Aimable  Lapage    150    "   " 

p^  Sanfacon  Lai^ 242     "  " 

p'"  maillie 197     "  '' 

p^  argent  de  Colonie    55     "  " 

Porte  autre  part  L  41 31. 12  [6] 

(Folio  4  Kahos  1778.)  Peletries 
Porte  d'autre  Part                         L4131.  12.6 

Etats  des  Dettes  par  Livres  de  comptes 
&ca  &ca  &ca 

Items  Mons^  Pichette 2.10    " 

M.  Jervais  [torn] 

M.  Glaude  Gagnier [torn] 

M.  Chas  DuCharme    8  [torn] 

M  Mercier  fils -. .  . .  5     ''  " 

M.  Fagot  fils  32.10    " 

M.  Pierre  Chuavin  150  lb  farine  &c i.io    " 

M.  Louis  La  mars  d^  mechant 19. 10  " 

M.  Milhomes  forgeron  85. 16  " 

M  Theophile  Lemai 25. 12   '* 

M  Mylotte  le  jeune    3. 15   '' 

M  Mylotte  I'aine 18. 15   " 

M^  Pierre  martin  Ensigne 21.15" 

M.  Bap^  Saucier 24     "  *' 

M.  Joseph  allarie  &  Compagnie 15     ''  " 

M.  George 2. 10  " 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1778  455 

Statement  of  notes  dup  and  by  whom  due. 

Item,  by  M.  Honors   60  "  " 

by  M.  Durand,  merchant   27  10  " 

by  an  order  of  M.  Jos.  Alarie 15  "  " 

by  Jos.  Lambert 150  10  " 

by  Le  Beau  Dechene 82  10  " 

by  M.  Valle,  hunter 103  ''  " 

by  Le  Petit  Baribeau 310  "  " 

by  two  notes  of  M.  Michot  Placette 239  17  6 

by  M.  Lapierre 304  "  " 

by  M.  Bte.  Alarie 48  "  5 

by  Aimable  Lepage 150  "  " 

by  Sansfafon  Sr 242  "  " 

by  Mailhet 197  "  " 

by  Colonial  money       55  "  " 


Carried  forward  L4131  12 

(Folio  4  Cahokia,  1778.)  PcltrieS 

Brought  forward  L'4131  12     6 

Statement  of  debts  in  livres  of  account, 
etc.  etc.  etc. 

Item,  M.  Pichet 2  10    " 

M.  Gervais ' torn 

M.  Claude  Gagnier torn 

M.  Chas.  DuCharme 8  torn 

M.  Mercier,  Jr 5     "    " 

M.  Fagot  Jr 32  10     " 

M.  Pierre  Chauvin,  150  lbs.  of  flour,  etc i  10     " 

M.  Louis  La  Mars  called  Mechant 19  10     " 

M.  Milhomme,  blacksmith 85  16     " 

M.  Theophile  Lemay 25  12     " 

M.  Milot  Jr 315     " 

M.  MilotSr 18  15     " 

M.  Pierre  Martin,  ensign    12  15     " 

M.  Bte.  Saucier 24     "    " 

M.  Joseph  Alarie  &  Company 15     "    " 


k 


(<   il 


H      it 


456  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

M.  Drouart 26. 18  " 

M.  D'etre 2. 10  '* 

M'"  Thomas  Brady 33- 15  " 

M.  Germain  Voyageur    65 

M.  Joseph  Giroux   47- 10 

M.  Francois  Trottier  Ecuyer   14    " 

M.  Dornon  Soldat   4. 10 

M.  Gagnon  La  Mason    20 

M.  Jimme  frinos 12.  25  " 

M.  Etienne  Et^ i-   5  " 

M™®  Laflanme  le  jeunne 6.   5  " 

M™  Denau  &  Hanson 7. 10  " 

M.  Renard  Deloge 6.   5  " 

M.  Touranjeau  Lieu^ 9. 15  '' 

M.  Monette 4. 10  *' 

M.  B^e  Metot   2. 10  '* 

M.  Dormeur  Lafleur   i.   5  " 

M.  Beaulieu    5     *'  " 

M.  Charles  Valle  Chasseur 2. 10  '* 

M.  Mercier  pere i.    5  " 

M.  Chabot 21     "  " 

porte  autre  part  [L  4731  12     "  ] 

(Folio  5  Kah6s  1778.)  Peletrics 
Suitte  de  1 'autre  Part             L  4731. 12  " 

M^  Govard  d^  Barron  p^  compte 13. 10  '' 

M.  Louis  Pillet     4.    5  " 

M  Joseph  LaPan^a   2. 15  " 

M.  Demoulin 7. 10  '' 

M.  Prennovaux 18     "  " 

M.  LaGrave    5     *'  " 

M.  Rassette 6     "  '' 

M.  Antoine  Boyer 2. 10  '^ 

M.  Reille 1. 17.6 

M.  Louis  Trottier 2. 10  " 

M.  Cocue  Coorville , 3.15  " 


i 


Carried  forward  L4731  12 
(Folio  5  Cahokia,  1778.)                                                          Peltries 

Brought  forward                                             L4731  12 

M.  Govard  called  Baron  for  account 13  10 

M.  Louis  Pillet 4  5 

M.  Joseph  Lapance 2  15 

M.  Dumoulin 7  10 

M.  Prenouvau 18  " 

M.  Lagrave 5  " 

M.  Racette 6  " 

M.  Antoine  Boyer 2  10 

M.  Reilhe i  17 

M.  Louis  Trottier 2  10 

M.  Cocue  Courville 3  15 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1778  457 

M.  George 2  10  " 

M.  Drouart 26  18  " 

M.  Dare 2  10  " 

M.  Thomas  Brady 3315  " 

M.  Germain,  traveler 65     "  ** 

M.  Joseph  Giroux 47  10  " 

M.  Francois  Trottier,  Esquire 14    "  " 

M.  Domon,  soldier 4  10  " 

M.  Jimmie  Frincs 12     5  " 

M.  Etienne  Et^ i     5  " 

Madame  Laflamme  Jr 6     5  " 

MM.  Denau  &  Hensra 7  10  " 

M.  Renard  Desloges 6    5  " 

M.  Touranjeau,  Lieut 915  " 

M.  Monette 4  10  " 

M.  Bte.  Methot    2  10  " 

M.  Dormeur  Lafleur i     5  " 

M.  Beaulieu 5     "  " 

M.  Charles  Vall^,  hunter 2  10  " 

M.  Mercier,  Sr i     5  " 

M.  Chabot 21     "  " 


((    (< 


U      il 


458  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Comptes  des  negress 

La  negresse  a  Govard   81     "  " 

Le  negre  a  Mon^  Trottier  Joseph 35. 10  " 

La  mullatresse  a  M^  Saucier    80     "  " 

Francois  negre  a  LeCompte 41     "  " 

Rose  negresse  a  M  Buteau 8     "  " 

Sasa  negre  a  Jacquett    16    "  " 

Rose  la  negress  a  M^  Saucier  21 

Moreaux  le  negre  au  Compte 16.    5 

Cabrie  Negre  a  M^  Touranjeau 11     " 

Negress  a  Robert   6    '' 

manuel  a  Beaulieu 7     " 

Therese  negress  a  Beaulieu 21     " 

Etienne  La  sauvage  a  Taillion 4 

Cotton  de  maillier  a  Touranjeau  10 

,   Alexis  Sauvage  a  Cadien 26. 10  " 

Jean  Bap^  Negre  a  Beaulieu 35. 10  '' 

Pompee  negre  a  Sanfajon 7     "  " 

montant  en  Peleteries  L  5,224. 19.  6 

Erreur  dans  I'original  de  30. 18.  6 

montant  de  I'original  L  5,255. 18  " 
Apres  avoir  tous  Estemer  et  Examinier  n'ayant  plus  rien 
Trouver  des  Biens  du  Defunt  Charls  Marois  nous  avons  Clos 
ledit  Inventaire  en  Presence  des  Messieurs  Francois  Trottier 
Capitaine  de  Milice  et  pierre  Martin  Ensigne  de  milice  tous  les 
deux  Resident  du  Village  de  Cahokias  arrette  a  la  somme  de  Cinq 
Mille  Deux  Cent  Cinquante  Cinq  Livre  dixhuit  sols  six  deniers  en 
Peletries  le  jour  et  L'an  cidevant  Stipules  &ca. 

Signe  fr^.  Trottier 
marque  de  Pierre  Martin  un  Croix 
Jn°  B,  Mansen  Scripsit 

Enregistree  a  la  requisition  de  Mons^  Clement  L'anglois  14  de 
Dec^  1778 

pd  4oib  in       Richard  McCarty  C.  &  N.  P. 

»  Moreau,  sold  to  Lecompte,  and  Manuel,  sold  to  Beaulieu,  were  the  negroes  executed 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  DECEMBER,  1778  459 

Account  of  negresses. 

The  negress  to  Govard '. 81     "  " 

The  negro  to  M.  Trottier,  Joseph 35  10  " 

The  mulatto  girl  to  M.  Saucier 80     "  " 

Francois,  negro,  to  Lecomte *.  .  41     "  " 

Rose, -negress,  to  M.  Buteau 8     "  " 

Sasa,  negro,  to  Jacquet 16     "  " 

Rose,  negress,  to  M.  Saucier 21     "  " 

Moreau,  negro,  to  Lecomte  ^   16     5  " 

Cabrie,  negro,  to  M.  Turanjeau. 11    '"  " 

Negress  to  Robert 6     ''  " 

Manuel  to  Beaulieu 7     "  '* 

Therese,  a  negress,  to  Beaulieu 21     "  " 

Etienne,  the  savage,  to  Taillon 4     "  " 

Cotton  de  Maillier  to  Touranjeau 10     "  " 

Alexis,  savage,  to  Cadien 26  10  " 

Jean  Baptiste,  negro,  to  Beaulieu 35  10  '' 

Pompee,  negro,  to  Sansfajon    7   ''  " 

Amounting  in  peltries  L  5,224.  19.  6 

Error  in  the  original  of  30.  18.  6 

Amount  of  the  original  5j255.  18.  " 

After  having  appraised  and  examined  everything  and  having 
found  no  other  goods  of  the  deceased  Charles  Marois  we  have 
closed  the  said  inventory  in  the  presence  of  MM.  Francois  Trottier, 
captain  of  the  militia,  and  Pierre  Martin,  ensign  of  the  militia, 
both  residents  of  the  village  of  Cahokia  and  agreed  on  the  sum  of 
five  thousand  two  hundred  and  fifty-five  livres  eighteen  sols  six 
deniers  in  peltries  the  day  and  year  here  before  stated  etc. 

Signed  Fr.  Trottier. 
Mark  of  Pierre  Martin,  a  cross. 
John  B.  Mansen  scripsit. 

Registered  at  the  requisition  of  M.  Clement  Langlois,  the  14th 
of  December  1778. 

Pd.  40  livres  in  money  [?]  Richard  McCarty,  N.  P. 

for  poisoning  M.  and  Madame  Nicolle.  Pompee,  sold  to  Harraand  called  Sansfafon,  is  the 
negro  over  whom  the  latter  had  so  much  trouble  in  regard  to  the  payment.  See  pp.  135,  137, 
196,  n.  i.  , 


46o  ILLINOIS  EtCSTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Le  soussigne  resident  Des  Kahos  Compte  Des  Illinois  ayant 
et^  appelle  au  Service  de  sa  patrice  Et  etant  a  present  audit  Ser- 
vice qui  pent  lappeller  hor  de  cette  Conte  Et  Province  et  pour  faire 
son  devoir  audit  service  est  oblige  d'abandonnd  toute  Commerce 
Et  nayant  D 'autre  Moyen  pour  paye  ses  debts  quavec  L 'argent 
Courant  de  ce  pays.  Cest  pourquoy  tous  Ceux  qui  ont  quelque 
Demande  Contre  luy  sont  requis  de  ce  presenter  pour  en  recevoir 
Le  payement  due  au  dix  de  juin  au  quel  temp  le  service  de  son 
patrie  Loblige  de  donner  toute  son  attention,  pourquoy  il  ne  pour- 
oit  repondre  a  aucune  action  intente  Contre  luy.  quau  retour  Du 
dit  Service,  ainsi  Ceux  qui  doivent  audit  Suppliant  Sont  requis  de 
faire  payement  Sans  plus  de  delay  toutes  personnes  qui  ont  de  Ses 
Bons  ou  Billet  de  Subsistance  pour  la  Compagnie  Sont  requis  in- 
cessament  de  les  presenter  pour  En  Etre  paye. 

Donne  au  Fort  Bowmante  4  juin  1779,  Signe  Richard  McCarty 
Capitaine  du  batailon  Illinois. 

Enregistre  a  la  Requisition  du  Mons^  richard  McCarty,  Le 
4  juin  1779     fr.  saucier  N.  P. 


(Folio  7,  KahAs  1779-) 

Dans  Le  Cour  de  Septembre  prochain  Je  payeray  a  lordre  de 
Mons^  Dav^®  MCrai  et  Comp^^  La  Somme  de  deux  Milles  quatre- 
vingt  treize  Livres  Cinq  Sols  en  Castor  et  Pelleteries  Savoir  le  Cas- 
tor a  cinquante  Sols,  Les  Loutres  a  Six  franc,  Et  Les  autres  pelle- 
teries au  prix  Courant  du  poste  pour  Valeur  recue  dudit  Sieur  Et 
ne  Sachant  signe  a  fait  sa  marque  ordinaire  en  presence  de  te- 

moins  cy  apris.  au  Grand  MaKokite  Le  29  Juillet  1779 -une 

croix  pour  Joseph  Roy  +  Lafantaisi  temoins. 

Dans  Le  Court  de  Septembre  prochain  Je  payeray  a  L'orde 
de  Mons  Dav'^®  MCrai  et  Compa^"^  La  Somme  de  deux  Cent 
quarente  huit  Livres  dix  Sols  payable  en  Castor  Et  pelleteries 
Savoir  Le  Castor  a  Cinquante  sols  La  livres  Les  Loutres  a  Six 
frans  pour  Valeur  recue  p^  Son  Compte  en  Marchandises  a  Defaut 

^  This  announcement  was  made  in  anticipation  of  the  contemplated  expedition  against 
Detroit  in  June,  1779. — English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  i,  369. 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  JUNE,  1779  461 

The  undersigned,  a  resident  of  Cahokia  in  the  county  of  the 
Illinois,  having  been  called  to  the  service  of  his  country  and  being 
at  present  on  the  said  service,  which  may  call  him  out  of  this 
country  and  province,  and  in  order  to  perform  his  duty  in  the  said 
service,  is  obliged  to  abandon  all  commerce;  and  not  having 
other  means  to  pay  his  debts  except  with  the  current  money  of 
this  country,  he  requires  for  this  reason  that  all  those  who  have 
any  claim  against  him  present  themselves  to  receive  the  payment 
due  therefor  on  the  tenth  of  June,  at  which  time  the  service  of  his 
country  obliges  him  to  give  all  his  attention;^  and  also  this  is  the 
reason  why  he  cannot  answer  action  brought  against  him  until 
his  return  from  the  said  service;  and  also  those  who  owe  the  said 
petitioner  are  required  to  make  payment  without  longer  delay; 
and  all  persons  who  have  his  hons  or  notes  of  support  for  the 
company  are  required  immediately  to  present  them  to  be  paid 
therefor.^ 

Given  at  Fort  Bowman,  June  4,  1779.  Signed  Richard  Mc- 
Carty,  Captain  of  the  Illinois  Battalion. 

Registered  at  the  requisition  of  M.  Richard  McCarty  June  4, 
1779.     Fr.  Saucier,  N.  P. 

(Folio  7,  Cahokia,  1779.) 

In  the  Court  of  September  next  I  will  pay  to  the  order  of  M. 
David  McCrae  and  Company  the  sum  of  two  thousand  and  ninety- 
three  livres  five  sols  in  beavers  and  peltries,  to  wit:  the  beaver 
at  fifty  sols,  the  otters  at  six  jrancs  and  the  other  peltries  at  the  cur- 
rent price  of  the  post,  for  value  received  from  the  said  gentleman; 
and  not  knowing  how  to  sign,  he  has  made  his  mark  in  the  presence 
of  witnesses  hereafter  named.  At  Grand  Makokite,^  the  29th  of 
July,  1779  —  a  cross  for  Joseph  Roy.  -f-  Lafantaisie,  witness. 

In  the  Court  of  September  next  I  will  pay  to  the  order  of  M. 
David  McCrae  and  Company  the  sum  of  two  hundred  and 
forty-eight  livres  ten  sols  payable  in  beaver  and  peltries,  to  wit: 
the  beaver  at  fifty  sols  the  pound,  the  otters  at  six  jrancs,  for  value 
received  according  to  his  account  in  merchandise;  in  default  of 
which,  if  I  cannot  sell  the  said  merchandise,  I  promise  to  return 

2  Grand  Makokite  is  in  the  present  state  of  Iowa. 


462  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

de  quoy  si  je  ne  puis  vendre  Les  dites  Marchandises  de  Les  re- 
mettre  en  meme  nature  Comme  EUe  Sont  porte  sur  ma  facture 
Et  ne  Sachant  signd  jay  fait  ma  marque  ordinaire  en  presence 
de  temoins  ci  apres.  au  Grand  makokite  Le  29  Juillet  1779.— 
marque  de  Joseph  Roy  +  . 
La  fantaisie  Temoins 

Enregistre  a  La  requisition  du  Sieur  Charle  Gratiot  Le   17 
D'aoust  1779.  F.  Saucier  N'"®  P 

A  qui  Conque  il  appartiendra  dautant  que  Charle  Gratiot 
Isaac  Levy,  et  Jean  Baptiste  Hubert  Lacroix  sujet  de  la  Republic 
de  la  Virginie  et  habitant  de  la  Ville  des  Cahoskias,  ayant  repre- 
sents quayant  fait  des  depenses  considerables  en  cherchant  a  pro- 
curer et  ramasser  un  Capitale  ou  une  Masse  Convenable  pour  le 
Commerce  Sauvage,  Et  quil  Sera  dans  leurs  pourvoir  de  fournir 
Les  Etats  en  provisions  ou  autre  Chause  necessaire,  Lesquelles 
sont  a  present  difl&cultueuse  a  avoir  En  Consequence  Nous  trou- 
vo[ns]  necessaire  de  les  autoriser  a  accomplir  leurs  desirs  ayant  de- 
mande  une  traitte  Exclusive  pour  un  Certain  tems  selon  les  limites 
prescrites. 

(Folio  8,  Kahos  1779.) 

a  present  il  faut  savoir  que  pour  mieux  les  autoriser  a  Execu- 
ter  Leur  Dessin  patriotique  Jay  accorde  Et  accorde  par  ses  pre- 
sente  aux  dits  Charle  Gratiot  Isaac  Levy  Et  Jean  Baptiste  Hubert 
Lacroix  de  ce  Jour  Jusqu'au  premier  D'avril  prochain  Le  seul 
Et  Exclusif  pouvoir  de  commerce  et  Libre  trafic  selon  Les  Limites 
prescrites  cy  bas;  Cest  a  dire,  Commencent  a  la  Ville  des  Cahos- 
kias de  la  montant  Le  Mississipi  Jusqu  'a  lentre  de  la  rivierre  des 
Illinois,  et  de  Chaqu'unes  des  pointes  ou  places  des  dittes  bornes, 
leurs  limites  Setendeons  sur  le  Cote  de  1 'Quest  Vingt  Lieu  Dans 
les  profondeurs. 

Toutes  fois  que  ceux  qui  ont  Ete  revetu  des  permis  pour  Les 
dittes  traittes,  Et  qui  ont  des  Marchandize  destine  pour  Le  meme 
Commerce,  il  Leur  Sera  permis  d'en  disposer  Selon  Les  bornes 
prescrittes,  Jusquau  premier  d'octobre  prochain. 

Pourvue  que  Laditte  Societte  Sera  en  tout  tems  responsable 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  AUGUST,  1779  463 

them  in  the  same  kind  as  they  are  entered  in  my  invoice;  and 
not  knowing  how  to  sign,  I  have  made  my  mark  in  the  presence 
of  witnesses  hereafter  named.  At  Grand  Makokite  the  29th  of 
July.     Mark  of  Joseph  Roy  +. 

La  Fantaisie,  witness.  F.  Saucier,  N.  P. 

Registered  at  the  requisition  of  M.  Charles  Gratiot,  August 
17,  1779- 

To  whomsoever  it  may  concern :  Inasmuch  as  Charles  Gratiot, 
Isaac  Levy  and  Jean  Baptiste  Hubert  LaCroix,  subjects  of  the 
Republic  of  Virginia  and  inhabitants  of  the  village  of  Cahokia, 
have  shown  that  they  have  made  considerable  expense  in  seeking 
to  procure  and  collect  a  capital  and  a  suitable  fund  for  trade  with 
the  savages ;  and  inasmuch  as  it  will  be  in  their  power  to  furnish 
the  States  with  provisions  and  other  necessary  things  which  are 
at  present  difficult  to  obtain:  consequently  we  find  it  necessary 
to  authorize  them  to  accomplish  their  desires,  as  set  forth  in  their 
prayer  for  an  exclusive  trade  for  a  certain  time  within  prescribed 
limits. 

(Folio  8,  Cahokia,  i779-) 

Now  it  must  be  known  that  in  order  to  empower  them  better 
to  carry  out  their  patriotic  design,  I  have  granted  and  do  grant 
by  these  presents  to  the  said  Charles  Gratiot,  Isaac  Levy  and  Jean 
Baptiste  Hubert  LaCroix  from  this  day  until  the  first  of  April 
next  the  sole  and  exclusive  power  of  trade  and  free  traffic  within 
the  limits  prescribed  herebelow:  that  is  to  say,  commencing  at 
the  village  of  Cahokia,  from  there  ascending  the  Mississippi  up 
to  the  mouth  of  the  Illinois  river;  and  from  each  point  and 
place  of  the  said  boundaries  we  extend  their  limits  on  the  side  of 
the  west  [east  ?]  twenty  leagues  in  depth. 

Nevertheless  it  should  be  known  that  it  is  permitted  those  who 
have  been  given  permission  for  the  same  trade  and  who  have 
merchandise  destined  for  the  same  commerce,  to  dispose  thereof 
within  the  prescribed  limits  until  the  first  of  October  next. 

Provided  that  the  said  society  shall  be  at  all  times  responsible 


464  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

pour  Leur  bonne  Et  Juste  Conduitte  au  pouvoir  Civile  Comme  si 
devant  Et  se  soumetteront  aux  Loix  Requise. 

Donn^  sous  ma  main  Et  Seaux  aux  Cahoskias  le  premiers  Jour 
*■  de  Septembre  Et  la  quatrieme  Annde  de  notre  Republic  anno 
Domini,  1779.  sign^     John  Todd. 

Je  Sertifie  La  presente  pour  veritable  Copie  tires  de  I'anglois 
aux  Cahoskias  2^^  Septembre  1779.     Sign^  W  [  ?]  Gooding,  secy. 

Enregistre  a  la  requisition  du  Sieur  Charle  Gratiot  aux  Cahos 
Les  10°^^  7bre  1779. 

fr.  Saucier  N^«.  P 

Moy  Le  Soussign^  natif  de  Connatucit  dans  la  nouvelle  Engle- 
terre  Comte  de  Hartford  ayant  son  nom  Et  autre  pour  Lequel  Je 
suis  Commencer  et  aist  Etabli  (dans  L'annee  de  notre  seigneur  mil 
Sept  Cent  soixante  et  quinze)  une  Certaine  quantite  de  terrin  sur 
le  Bord  du  Mississipy  a  L'este  vis  a  vis  le  Village  de  St  Louis  du 
Cote  Des  Espagnol  sur  L'oust  de  la  dit  rivierre  quantite  point 
Connu  tennant  du  Cote  du  Sud  le  long  La  rivierre  de  M^  Labb6 
Commenceant  a  une  branche  entre  dans  le  Mississipi  du  bord  du 
quel  en  allant  ouest  Jusqu'a  lac  manissioui  Entre  Dans  Laditte 

(Folio  9,  Ka6s  1779) 

rivierre  de  mr  Lable,  Et  du  Cote  du  nord  Commenant  a  un  Cer- 
tain Cautonier  vis  a  vis  une  Certaine  Cote  de  rocher  sur  le  Bord 
despagne  du  mississipy  en  allant  ouest  Jusqu  'au  Lac  dudit  Manis- 
siolii,  Etant  et  Joignant  du  Cote  D  'ouest  pardevant  par  le  missis- 
sipy par  le  Sud  par  la  rivierre  de  m^  Lable  par  L  'est  par  le  lac 
manissioui  et  au  nord  par  de  terre  non  concede  Et  Come  Le  Sous- 
signe  ait  fait  de  Grand  depence  pour  Etablir  des  Moulin  Sur  La 
dite  rivierre  de  m^  Labbe  ou  ils  sont  actuellement  il  a  Fait  suivant 
La  Coutume  Du  pays  prendre  Et  en  a  fait  Clau  et  Labourer  une 
partis  D  'un  Certain  Terrain  de  La  Largeur  de  dix  arpant  sur  le 
Cote  du  Sud  dudit  Rivierre  allant  de  ladite  rivierre  sud  au  nord  du 
Grand  marrais  Joignant  du  Cote  de  ouest  au  terre  prise  par  Les 
habitants  des  Cahos  et  a  1  'est  au  terrin  non  Consede  Et  Comme 

1  The  French  of  this  document  is  impossible,  and  several  passages,  of  which  the  opening 
one  is  the  worst,  are  untranslatable.  McCarty's  French  is  at  best  remarkable,  but  this  docu- 
ment excels  the  others  in  peculiarities.  It  has  seemed  impossible  to  certify  the  correctness 
of  each  error,  so  I  will  give  a  blanket  certificate  that  the  above  is  a  correct  transcription.     The 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1779  465 

for  their  good  and  just  conduct  to  the  civil  power  as  herebefore 
and  submit  themselves  to  the  required  law. 

Given  under  my  hand  and  seal  at  Cahokia,  the  first  day  of 
September  and  the  fourth  year  of  our  Republic  Anno  Domini 
1779.     Signed  John  Todd. 

1  certify  that  the  present  is  a  true  copy  translated  from  the 
English.     At  Cahokia,  September  2,  1779.     Signed 

W.  [?]  Goodin,  Sec'y 
Registered  at  the  requisition  of  M.  Charles  Gratiot  at  Cahokia, 
the  loth  of  September,  1779.     Fr.  Saucier,  N.  P. 

I,  the  undersigned,  native  of  Connecticut  in  New  England, 
county  of  Hartford,  in  his  name  and  another's,  have  begun  to 
and  have  laid  off  (in  the  year  of  our  Lord,  1775)  a  certain 
strip  of  land  on  the  east  bank  of  the  Mississippi  and  opposite 
the  village  of  St.  Louis  of  the  Spanish  side  on  the  "west,  area 
not  known. ^  It  extends  on  the  southern  side  along  the  river  of 
M.  Labbe,  commencing  at  a  branch  which  enters  the  Mississippi, 
from  the  banks  of  which  it  extends  west  as  far  as  where  lake 
Manissiouri  enters  the  said  river  of  M.  Labbe;  and  on  the  north 

(Folio  9,  Caholsia  1779.) 

commencing  at  a  certain  roadway  [?]  opposite  a  certain  rocky 
bluff  on  the  Spanish  bank  of  the  Mississippi,  it  extends  west  to 
the  said  lake  Manissiouri,  being  bordered  on  the  west  by  the 
Mississippi,  on  the  south  by  the  river  of  M.  Labbe,  on  the  east 
by  the  lake  Manissiouri  and  on  the  north  by  non-ceded  land. 
And  since  the  undersigned  has  been  at  great  expense  to  establish 
mills  on  the  said  river  of  M.  Labbe,  where  they  are  at  present,  he 
has  caused  it  to  be  taken  up  in  accordance  with  the  custom  of  the 
country  and  has  made  enclosure  thereon  and  put  in  cultivation 
a  part  of  a  certain  field  of  ten  arpents  in  extent  on  the  southern 
side  of  the  said  river,  extending  from  the  said  river  south  to  the 
north  of  the  Grand  Marais  ^  and  adjoining  on  the  western  side  the 
land  occupied  by  the  inhabitants  of  Cahokia  and  on  the  east  the  land 

handwriting  of  the  original  is  very  clear,  so  that  the  only  chance  of  error  is  through  oversight; 
but  since  every  line  offered  its  own  peculiarities  in  grammar  and  spelling,  the  document  has 
been  studied  more  carefully  than  others. 

2  A  river  in  Cahokia  district. 


466  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

quand  Le  Soussignd  a  pris  Ces  dit  terrins  il  n'etoit  point  deter- 
miner dans  quel  province  EUe  Sera  Le  Soussigne  n'avoit  point 
fait  application  a  aucune  pour  des  titres,  Le  Commandant  pour 
Lors  Etant  dans  ce  pays  (Cap^  Lord)  me  disoit  que  mes  Etab- 
lissement  Etoit  suffisant  pour  me  procurer  icelle  quand  cella  seroit 
decidoist  a  present  par  La  faveur  de  DIEU  nous  vivant  sur  et  dans 
un  etat  Libre  et  independant  et  nous  Jouissons  de  tous  nos  Droit 
comme  peuple  Libre  Je  madresse  au  Majistrat  dud^  District 
quil  fasse  Enregistrer  dans  leur  Gref  ce  placar  que  par  la  Suitte 
pfersonne  ignore  mes  pretention  en  foy  de  quoy  Jay  Signe  la  pre- 
sente  au  Cahos  le  lo  jour  de  Juin  1779. 

(Signe)  Richard  M.  Carty 
Enregistre  a  la  requisition  de  Sieur  richard  M  Carty  aux  le  11 
octobre  1779 

fr  saucier  Nr  P. 

Extrait  Des  registres  de  la  Juridiction  Des  Cahos. 

aujourdhuy  dixieme  Jour  du  mois  de  Septembre  mil  Sept  Cent 
Soixante  Et  Dix  neuf,  Est  Comparu  au  Greffe  de  Se  Siege  marie 
aubuchon  porteuse  du  testament  de  deffeunt  rene  Locat  passe 
pardevan  Le  notaire  Soussigne  Le  vingt  quatre  Juin  contenant 
Ce  qui  Suit. 

(Folio  10,  Kaos  1779.) 

Lan  mil  Sept  Cent  Soixante  Et  dix  neuf  le  Vingt  quatrieme 
Jour  du  mois  de  Juin  fut  present  Sieur  Rene  Locat  habitant  de- 
meurant  au  Village  des  Cahos  Lequel  Etant  malade  depuis  Long- 
tems  sans  neanmoin  desprit  memoires  Et  entandement  ainsi  quil 
a  paru  au  notaire  soussigne,  et  des  temoins  Enfins  nomes  Conside- 
rant  quil  n  'en  rien  de  plus  Certins  que  La  Mort  ni  de  plus  incer- 
tains  que  Son  heure  Crayant  D'en  Etre  prevenu  sans  avoir  dis- 
poser du  peu  de  Bien  quil  a  plut  a  dieu  Luy  donner  a  fait  dieter 
et  nome  audit  Notaire  et  temoins  soussigne  Son  present  testament 
et  ordonnance  de  derniere  Volonte  En  La  maniere  qui  Suit  PRE- 
MIEREMENT  Comme  Chretien  Et  Chatholique  a  reCommande 

1  This  claim  was  allowed  to  McCarty's  heirs  by  the  U.S.  land  commissioners. — Amer. 
Stale  Pap.,  Pub.  Lands,  ii.,  160. 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1779  467 

not  conceded.  And  since  at  the  time  when  the  undersigned  took  up 
these  said  lands  it  was  not  decided  in  what  province  this  country 
was  to  be,  the  undersigned  did  not  make  application  to  any  one 
for  title-deeds,  and  the  commandant  at  that  time  in  the  country, 
Captain  Lord,  told  me  that  my  buildings  were  sufficient  to  pro- 
cure for  me  the  same  when  it  should  be  decided.  Since  now  by 
the  favor  of  God  we  are  living  safe  and  in  a  free  and  independent 
state  and  are  enjoying  all  our  rights  as  a  free  people,  I  address 
myself  to  the  magistrates  of  the  said  district  that  they  may  cause 
to  be  registered  in  their  office  this  announcement  that  in  the  future 
no  person  be  ignorant  of  my  pretentions.  In  faith  of  which  I 
have  signed  the  present  at  Cahokia  the  loth  day  of  June,  1779.* 

(Signed)  Richard  McCarty. 

Registered  at  the  request  of  M.  Richard  McCarty  on  the  nth 
of  October,  1779. 

F.  Saucier,  N.  P. 

Extract  of  the  Registers  of  the  Magistracy  of  Cahokia. 

To-day  the  tenth  day  of  the  month  of  September,  1779,  there 
appeared  at  the  office  of  this  Court  Marie  Aubuchon,  bearer  of 
the  last  will  and  testament  of  the  deceased  Rene  Locat,  made 
before  the  undersigned  notary  the  24th  of  June,  which  contains 
what  follows: 

(Folio  9  Cahokia  1779.) 

The  year,  1779,  the  24th  day  of  the  month  of  June,  there  was 
present  M.  Rene  Locat,  inhabitant  domiciled  in  the  village  of 
Cahokia,  who,  having  been  sick  for  a  long  time  without  loss,  how- 
ever, of  intelligence,  memory  and  understanding,  as  appeared  to  the 
undersigned  notary  and  witnesses  named  below,  and  considering 
that  there  is  nothing  more  certain  than  death  and  more  uncertain 
than  its  hour,  and  fearing  to  be  overtaken  thereby  without  having 
disposed  of  the  little  property  which  it  has  pleased  God  to  give 
him,  has  dictated  to  the  said  notary  and  undersigned  witnesses 
his  present  last  will  and  testament  in  the  manner  which  follows: 
In  the  first  place  as  Christian  and  catholic  he  recommends  his 
soul  to  God  the  Creator,  Father,  Son  and  Holy  Ghost,  supplicat- 
ing His  divine  goodness,  by  the  infinite  mercy  of  our  Lord  Jesus 


468  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Son  ame  a  dieu  Le  Createur  pere  fils  Et  S*  Esprit  Supliant  Sa  di- 
vine Bont6  par  les  merite  infinie  de  notre  Seigneur  JESUS 
CHRIST  et  par  L 'intercession  de  la  Cour  Celeste  Le  placer  au 
royaume  des  Cieux  au  nombre  des  bienheureux  VEUT  et  entand 
Ledit  testateur  que  Ses  deptes  Soyent  paye  et  tor  par  Luy  fait  si 
auqu'un  Se  trouve  repards  par  son  heritier  Cy  apres  nommes,  il 
desire  premierement  que  Son  Coprs  [sic]  soit  Ent^r^  dans  Le  Simitier 
de  cette  paroisse  au  nombre  des  fidelle  trepass^  Et  quil  Luy  Soit 
Cinquante  Messe  ou  Services  pour  le  repos  de  Son  ame  pendant  le 
Cour  de  I'annee  Etquand  aux  regards  de  tous  Les  Biens  meubles 
immeubles  propres  acquits  et  Conquest  a  Luy  appartenant  de  telle 
nature  quils  puissent  Etre  Et  en  quelle  Endroits  quils  Soyent  Situ6 
Sans  auqu'un  riserve,  il  les  donne  Et  abandonne  a  dame  Marie 
aubuchon  Son  epouse  pandant  Sa  vie  durante  pour  en  Jouir  Sen 
Servire  et  en  recevoir  Lusufruct  et  meme  Les  Vendre  ou  aliener  si 
elle  Se  trouve  dans  le  cas  d'en  avoir  besoin,  et  en  disposer  Comme  de 
Chose  a  Elle  appartenant  de  plain  droits  en  Cas  de  necessite  pan- 
dant son  veuvage,  Et  se  pour  reConnoitre  Les  bons  services  peines 
soins  et  ontentions  que  lad**^  dame  Marie  Aubuchon  sa  femme  a 
eu  pour  luy  et  quil  espere  quelle  aura  tant  quil  plaira  a  dieu  de 
Les  Lesser  ensemble;  Et  apres  La  mort  de  Lad^*^  dame  Marie 
aubuchon  Led^  Testateur  Substitue  pour  Son  Heritier  univer- 
selle  Et  Legitime  La  personne  de  Gabriel  Marlot  son  Beau  fils  a 
qui  il  donne  Et  abandonne  de  tout  Et  a  toujour  En  plaines  pro- 
priete  tous  les  biens  Meubles  Et  immeubles  propres  acquets  Et 
Conquets  qui  resteront  de  lad^^^  succession  apres  La  mort  de 
ditte  dame  Marie  aubuchons  sa  mere  Et  Epouse  dud^  testateur, 
ce  que  led^  Gabriel  Marlot  prendra  La  ditte  Succession  En  1  'etat 
quelle  Se  trouvera,  apres  La  mort  de  Sa  ditte  Mere,  Si  mieux  toute 
fois  il  n'aime  y  renoncer. 

(Folio  II,  Ka6s  1779.) 

Et  pour  tous  Les  autres  pretendants  a  laditte  Succession  il 
leur  Donne  Et  Legue  a  chaqu  'un  La  Somme  de  Sinq  Sols  une  fois 

1  The  regular  words  used  to  describe  the  manner  in  which  property  has  been  acquired. 
The  propres  are  property  obtained  by  direct  inheritance  or  gift  from  ascendants;  the  acquets, 
that  acquired  in  other  ways  before  marriage;  the  conquets  are  same,  only  acquired  after  mar- 
riage.— VioUet,  Hist,  du  droit  civil  Fran^ais,  824. 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1779  469 

Christ  and  by  the  intercession  of  the  Celestial  Court  to  receive 
him  in  the  Kingdom  of  Heaven  among  the  number  of  the  blessed. 
The  said  testator  wishes  and  requires  that  his  debts  be  paid  and 
that  if  any  wrong  is  found  to  have  been  committed  by  him  that 
reparation  be  made  by  his  heir  hereafter  named.  He  desires 
first  that  his  body  be  interred  in  the  cemetery  of  this  parish  among 
the  number  of  the  faithful  who  have  departed  this  life  and  that 
there  be  held  fifty  masses  or  services  for  the  repose  of  his  soul  during 
the  course  of  the  year.  As  regards  all  his  real  and  personal  prop- 
erty, inherited  or  acquired  before  or  after  marriage,*  belonging  to 
him  of  whatever  nature  and  in  whatever  place  it  may  be  situated? 
without  any  reserve  he  gives  and  devises  it  to  Marie  Aubuchon, 
his  wife,  to  possess  and  make  use  thereof  during  her  natural 
life  and  to  receive  therefrom  the  usufruct  and  even  to  sell  and 
alienate  it,  if  she  finds  there  is  need  thereof,  and  to  dispose 
thereof  as  a  thing  belonging  to  her  in  full  right,  in  case  of  necessity, 
during  her  widowhood;  and  this  is  done  to  give  recognition  to 
the  good  services,  labor  and  care  which  the  said  Madame  Marie 
Aubuchon,  his  wife,  has  had  for  him  and  which  he  hopes  she 
will  have  so  long  as  it  shall  please  God  to  leave  them  together;  and 
after  the  death  of  the  said  Madame  Marie  Aubuchon,  the  said 
testator  substitutes  for  his  sole  and  legitimate  heir  the  person  of 
Gabriel  Marlot,  his  stepson,  to  whom  he  gives  and  devises  entirely 
and  forever  in  full  proprietorship  all  the  real  and  personal  property, 
inherited  or  acquired  before  or  after  marriage,  which  shall  re- 
main of  the  said  estate  after  the  death  of  the  said  Madame  Marie 
Aubuchon,  his  mother  and  wife  of  the  testator;  that  is  to  say  that 
the  said  Gabriel  Marlot  shall  take  the  said  estate  in  the  state  that 
he  shall  find  it  after  the  death  of  his  said  mother,  if  he  does  not 
prefer  to  renounce  it. 

(Folio  II,  Cahokia,  1779.) 

And  to  each  of  the  other  pretendants  to  the  said  estate  he 
gives  and  bequeaths  the  sum  of  five  sols  in  full  satisfaction  of  all 
claims;  and  he  revokes  and  annuls  all  other  testaments  which  he 
may  have  made  herebefore  to  the  prejudice  of  the  present  one, 
which  alone  he  determines  to  be  his  last  will  and  testament  and 


470  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

pay^  revoquant  Et  annuUant  tous  autres  testaments  quil  pourroit 
avoir  fait  ci  devant  aux  prejudice  des  presentes  au'quelles  Seul  il 
Sarette  Comme  Etant  Sa  derniere  Volonte  quil  Entant  toujour 
Etre  valable  nonobstant  Surrannation  ou  1  'absence  du  tems  atendu 
que  Sa  Maladie  le  pouroit  encore  prolonger  Longtems  ci  dont  il 
ne  peut  prevenir  La  finie.  Et  pour  I'execution  des  presentes  a 
nomme  pour  Son  procureur  Testamentaire  La  personne  de  Mon- 
sieur Cerre.  Marchand  residant  aux  KasKasKias,  pour  agir  et 
faire  valoir  apres  Son  decest  le  present  Testament  qui  nous  a  et^ 
ainsi  dicte  et  nomme  par  led*  Sieur  Testateur  en  presence  des  te- 
moins  et  nous  notaire  Soussigne  et  a  luy  Lue  et  relu  quil  a  dit  En- 
tendre et  veut  quil  Soit  ainsi  Execute  selon  Sa  teneur. 

Fait  en  La  Maison  dudit  rene  Locat  En  presences  des  Sieurs  fran- 
cois  trotier  Equier,  p^^  Godin  Cap*^  de  Milice  Michel  Beaulieu  J" 
B*^  Saucier  Et  Amable  Lepage  Tous  Cinq  habitant  residens  aux 
Cahos  a  ce  requis  et  appelles  pour  temoins  qui  ont  avec  nous 
Notaire  Signe  Le  present  Testament  et  led*  rene  Locat  a  dit  ne  le 
Savoir  de  ce  interpelle  a  fait  une  Croix  pour  marque  apres  Lecture 
faite  aux  Cahos  Le  Vingt  quatrieme  Jour  du  mois  de  Juina  sixheure 
de  releve  Mil  Sept  Cent  Soixante  Et  dix  neuf  signe  a  I'original 
une  -|-  pour  marque  de  rene  Locat  francois  trottier  p.  Godin 
B*^  saucier  Et  amable  lepage  Et  nous  notaire  soussigne.  se  reque- 
rant  Ladt**^  dame  marie  aubuchon  insinuation  dud*  testament 
Lecture  faite  di  celuy  En  notre  greffe  nous  Lavons  insinue  Et 
enregistre  sur  les  registres  des  insinuation  de  ce  Siege  suivant  L'or- 
donnance  pour  servir  et  valoir  Ce  que  de  raison  dont  acte  Le  dit 
Jour  Et  an.  fr  saucier  N^^  P. 

Extrait  des  registre  de  La  Juridiction  Des  CaHos. 

aujourdhuy  Cinquieme  Jour  du  mois  de  Juin  Mil  sept  Cent 
quatrevint  Est  Comparu  au  Greffe  de  ce  Siege  Monsieur  Richard 
McCarty  Capitaine  au  Bataillion  des  illinois  porteur  d 'une  Com- 
mission de  Capitaine  au  Contenant  ce  qui  Suit,  the  COMMON- 
WEALTH of  Virginia  to  Richard  McCarthy  Esquire.  Know 
you  that  from  the  Special  trust  and  Confidence  vi^hich  is  reposed 
in  your  patriotism,  Fidelity,  Courage,  and  Good  Conduct,  you  are, 
by   these  presents,    Constituted    and   appointed   Captain  of   a 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  JUNE,  1780  471 

which  he  requires  to  be  held  valid  notwithstanding  the  expiration 
or  absence  of  time,  because  his  sickness  may  still  prolong  his 
stay  here,  the  end  of  which  he  can  not  foresee.  And  for  the  exe- 
cution of  these  presents  he  has  named  for  his  testamentary 
attorney  the  person  of  M.  Cerre,  trader  residing  at  Kaskaskia, 
to  act  and  cause  to  be  maintained  after  his  decease  the  present 
testament,  which  has  been  signed  in  the  presence  of  witnesses 
and  of  us,  the  undersigned  notary,  and  read  and  reread  to  him ; 
and  he  has  said  he  required  and  wished  that  it  be  so  put  in 
execution  in  accordance  to  its  tenor. 

Made  in  the  house  of  the  said  Rene  Locat  in  the  presence  of 
MM.  Francois  Trottier  Esquire,  Pierre  Godin,  captain  of  the  mili- 
tia, Michel  Beaulieu,  Jean  Bte.  Saucier  and  Amable  Lepage,  all 
five  inhabitants  domiciled  at  Cahokia  summoned  and  called  as 
witnesses,  who  have  with  us,  the  notary,  signed  the  present  testa- 
ment, and  the  said  Rene  Locat  has  said  that  he  did  not  know  how 
to  sign  and  has  made  a  cross  for  his  mark  after  reading  was  made. 
At  Cahokia  the  24th  day  of  month  of  June  at  six  o'clock  in  the 
afternoon,  1779.  Signed  in  the  original  a  -1-  for  the  mark  of  Ren^ 
Locat,  Francois  Trottier,  P.  Godin,  Bte.  Saucier  and  Amable 
Lepage  and  we  the  undersigned  notary.  The  said  Madame  Marie 
Aubuchon  requiring  registration  of  the  said  will  and  testament, 
after  reading  was  made  of  it  in  our  office,  we  have  inscribed  and 
registered  it  in  the  record  of  registrations  of  this  Court  in  com- 
pliance with  the  ordinance,  that  it  may  be  used  and  have  its  effect, 
of  which  this  act  will  certify,  the  said  day  and  year. 

Fr.  Saucier,  N.  P. 

Extracts  of  the  Registers  of  the  Magistracy  of  Cahokia. 

To-day  the  fifth  day  of  the  month  of  June,  1780,  there  appeared 
at  the  office  of  this  Court  M.  Richard  McCarty,  captain  in  the 
Illinois  battallion,  bearer  of  a  commission  of  captain,  containing 
what  follows:  The  Commonwealth  of  Virginia  to  Richard  Mc- 
Carty, Esquire.  Know  you  that  from  the  special  trust  and  con- 
fidence which  is  reposed  in  your  patriotism,  fidelity,  courage  and 
good  conduct,  you  are  by  these  presents  constituted  and  appointed 
captain  of  a  company  in  the  battallion  of  regular  forces  raised  for 


472  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Compagnie  in  the  Battalion  of  regular  forces  raised  for  the  defence 
and  protection  of  this  State  Illinois  County  and  for  repelling 
every  hostile  invation  thereof.  You  are  therefore  Carefully  and 
diligently  to  discharge  the  duty  of  Captain  by  doing  and  perform- 
ing all  Manner  of  things  thereunto  belonging;  and  all  ofl&cers 
and  Soldiers  under  your  Command  are  hereby  Strictly  charged 
and  required  to  be  obedient  to  your  orders  as  Captain  and  you 
are  to  observe  and  follow  Such  orders  and  directions,  from  time 
to  time,  as  you  shall  receive  from  the   executive  power  of  this 

(Folio  12,  Cahos  1780.) 

State,  or  any  your  Superior  officers,  according  to  the  rules  and 
dicipline  of  War,  in  purSuance  of  the  trust  reposed  in  you. 
Witnes  patrick  Henry  Esquire  Gouvernour  or  chief  Magistrate 
of  the  Commonwealth  aforesaid,  this  first  day  of  March  in  the 
third  year  of  the  Commonwealth,  annoq  dom.  1779. 

fr.  saucier  Gref  Sign^)  P  Henry 

Et  au  dos  Est  Ecrit 
Illinois  County    wit 

Richard  McCarty  esq.  was  duly  qualified  before  me  to  the 
within  Commission  the  13*^  June  1779. 

(Signed)  Jn  Todd  J^ 
Extrait  Des  registre  de  la  Juridiction  Des  Cahokias. 
aujourdhuy  Cinquieme  Jour  du  mois  d'octobre  Mil  Sept  Cent 
quatrevingt  Est  Comparu  au  Greffe  de  Se  Siege  Est  Comparu 
[sic]  Le  Sieur  Yacinte  S*  Cirre  porteur  de  Son  testament  de  der- 
niere  Volonte  passe  pardevant  Le  notaire  soussigne  Contenant  ce 
qui  Suit. 

Par  devant  Le  notaire  publique  aux  village  des  Cahokia  et  des 
temoins  Soussigne  fut  present  Sieur  Yacinte  Saint  Sire  demeurant 
a  S*  Louis,  Desirant  Sabsenter  pour  quelque  tems  de  ce  pays,  Et 
Considerant  quil  ny  a  rien  de  plus  Certain  que  La  mort  ni  de  plus 
incertain  que  Son  heure  Crayant  d*en  etre  prevenu  Sans  avoir  dis- 
poser du  peu  de  bien  quil  a  plut  a  dieu  Luy  donner  a  fait  dieter 
aud*  notaire  Et  temoin  Soussign^  Son  present  testament,  et  ordon- 
nance  de  derniere  volonte  de  La  maniere  qui  Suit  Si  il  plait  a  dieu 
de  disposer  de  Luy.  premierement  veut  et  Entand  Le  dit  testateur 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1780  473 

the  defence  and  protection  of  this  state,  Illinois  county,  and  for 
repelling  every  hostile  invasion  thereof.  You  are  therefore  carefully 
and  diligently  to  discharge  the  duty  of  captain  by  doing  and  per- 
forming all  manner  of  things  thereunto  belonging;  and  all  officers 
and  soldiers  under  your  command  are  hereby  strictly  charged 
and  required  to  be  obedient  to  your  orders  as  captain,  and  you  are 
to  observe  and  follow  such  orders  and  directions,  from  time  to 
time,  as  you  shall  receive  from  the  executive  power  of  this  state  or 

(Folio  12,  Cahokia  1780.) 

any  of  your  superior  officers,  according  to  the  rules  and  discipline 
of  war,  in  pursuance  of  the  trust  reposed  in  you. 

Witness,  Patrick  Henry  Esquire,  Governor  or  Chief  Magistrate 
of  the  Commonwealth  aforesaid,  this  first  day  of  March  in  the 
third  year  of  the  Commonwealth,  in  the  year  of  the  Lord,  1779. 
Fr.  Saucier,  Clerk.  (Signed)  P.  Henry. 

And  on  the  back  is  written  Illinois  County  to  wit : 
Richard  McCarty  Esq.  was  duly  qualified  before  me  to  the 
within  commission  the  13th  of  June,  1779. 

(Signed)  John  Todd  Jr. 


Extract  .of  the  Registers  of  the  Magistracy  of  Cahokia. 

To-day  the  fifth  day  of  the  month  of  October  1780,  there 
appeared  at  the  office  of  this  Court  M.  Yacinte  St.  Cyr,  bearer 
of  his  last  will  and  testament  passed  before  the  undersigned 
notary,  containing  what  follows: 

Before  the  notary  public  in  the  village  of  Cahokia  and  under- 
signed witnesses,  there  was  present  M.  Yacinte  Sainte  Cyr, 
dwelling  in  St.  Louis,  who  desires  to  absent  himself  some  time 
from  this  country,  and  considering  that  there  is  nothing  more 
certain  than  death  nor  more  uncertain  than  its  hour  and  fearing 
to  be  overtaken  without  having  disposed  of  the  little  property 
that  it  has  pleased  God  to  give  him,  he  has  had  dictated  to  the 
said  notary  and  undersigned  witnesses  his  present  last  will  and 
testament  in  the  manner  which  follows,  should  it  please  God  to 
take  him  away.    In  the  first  place  the  said  testator  wishes  and 


474  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

que  Ses  Deptes  Soyent  paye  et  tor  par  Luy  fait  Si  aucun  ce 
trouve  Et  quand  au  regard  de  tous  Ses  biens  il  donne  Et  Legue 
deux  mil  Livres  en  argent  a  Yacinte  S*  Cirre  fils  de  pierre  S* 
Cirre  son  fiUau.  et  quand  au  reste  de  tout  ce  qui  peut  Luy 
appartenir  dans  Le  pays  des  Illinois,  Veut  et  Entand  Led*  testateur 
que  La  moiti^  Sera  delivr^  au  pauvre  et  L  'autre  moitie  pour  f aire 
prie  Dieu  pour  Le  repos  de  Son  ame  Et  pour  tout  autre  qui  pouroit 
pretendre  a  laditte  Sucession  Sil  Sen  trouvoit  Led*  testateur 
Leurs  Legue  et  donne  a  Chaqu'un  Cinq  Sols  une  fois  paye,  revo- 
quant  et  annuUant  par  Ces  presentes  tout  autre  testament  quil 
pourroit  avoir  fait  cy  devant  au  prejudice  du  present  auquel  Seul 
il  Sarette  Comme  Etant  sa  derniere  Volonte  quil  entend  toujour 
Etre  valable  Et  Pour  Lexecution  des  presentes  Led*  testateur  a 
Choisi  Et  nomme  Pour  Son  Executeur  testamentaire  La  per- 
sonne  de  Monsieur  Gabriel  Cerre  negociant  residant  a  Saint  Louis 
d'agir  en  Consequence  du  present  testament  sur  tous  Les  Biens 

(Folio  13,  Cah6s  1780.) 

quil  a  et  peut  avoir  dans  Le  pays  des  Illinois  Et  veut  quil  Soit 
Executer  Selon  Sa  teneur  Fait  et  passe  En  Letude  Lan  Mil  Sept 
Cent  quatrevingt  Et  Le  Cinquieme  Jour  du  mois  d'octobre  apres 
midy  En  presence  des  Sieurs  francois  trotier  B*®  Dubuc  Jn  B*^ 
Lacroix  Et  charle  Lefevre  temoins  a  ce  requis  qui  ont  Signe  a 
Lexception  dud*  Sieur  Yacinte  S*  Cirre  qui  a  declare  ne  Le  Savoir 
Et  a  fait  Sa  marque  dune  Croix  apres  Lecture  faite  Suivant  L'or- 
donnance  ainsi  Signe  a  Loriginal  une  +  pour  marque  de  Yacinte 
S*  Cirre  fr  trotier  Ch^^  Lefevre  J.  B*«  Lacroix  et  B*^  Dubuc  Et 
nous  notaire  soussigne.  fr  saucier 


1 78 1  Extrait  des  registre  de  La  Juridiction  Des  Cahos. 

aujourd'huy  troisieme  Jour  du  mois  d'vril  [sic]  Mil  Sept  Cent 
quatrevingt  un  Est  Comparu  au  Gref  de  ce  Siege  Le  Sieur  pierre 
prevost  porteur  d'une  Lettre  a  Luy  adressd  Signe  Thomas  Bentley 
datt^  du  quatorze  decembre  Mil  Sept  Cent  quatrevint  Contenant 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  APRIL,  1781  475 

requires  that  his  debts  be  paid  and  any  wrong  committed  by  him, 
if  any  is  found,  righted,  and  as  regards  all  his  property,  he  gives 
and  bequeaths  two  thousand  livres  in  money  to  Yacinte  St.  Cyr, 
son  of  Pierre  St.  Cyr,  his  god-son;  and  as  to  the  balance  of  all 
that  which  may  belong  to  him  in  the  country  of  the  Illinois,  the 
said  testator  wishes  and  requires  that  half  shall  be  given  to  the 
poor  and  the  other  half  to  cause  prayer  to  be  made  to  God  for  the 
repose  of  his  soul.  And  to  each  of  the  other  pretendants  to  the 
said  estate,  if  any  be  found,  the  said  testator  bequeaths  and  gives 
five  sols  in  full  satisfaction  of  *  all  claims ;  and  he  revokes  and 
annuls  by  these  presents  all  other  testaments  which  he  may  have 
made  to  the  prejudice  of  the  present  one,  which  alone  he  deter- 
mines to  be  his  last  wish  and  which  he  requires  always  to  be  valid ; 
and  for  the  execution  of  the  presents  the  said  testator  has  chosen  and 
named  for  his  testamentary  executor  the  person  of  M.  Gabriel 
Cerr^,  merchant  residing  in  St.  Louis,  who  is  to  take  action  in 

(Folio  13,  Cahokia,  1780.) 

consequence  of  the  present  testament  in  regard  to  all  the  property 
which  he  has  and  may  have  in  the  country  of  the  Illinois  and  he 
wishes  that  it  be  put  in  execution  according  to  its  tenor.  Made 
and  passed  in  the  office  in  the  year,  1780,  and  the  fifth  day  of  the 
month  of  October  in  the  afternoon,  in  the  presence  of  MM. 
Francois  Trottier,  Bte.  Dubuque,  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix  and  Charles 
Lefevre,  witnesses  summoned  for  this  purpose,  who  have 
signed  with  the  exception  of  the  said  M.  Yacinte  St.  Cyr  who  has 
declared  that  he  did  not  know  how  and  has  made  his  mark  with  a 
cross,  after  the  reading  was  made,  in  compliance  with  the  ordi- 
nance. Thus  signed  in  the  original  a  +  for  the  mark  of  Yacinte 
St.  Cyr,  Fr.  Trottier,  Charles  Lefevre,  J.  Bte.  LaCroix  and  Bte. 
Dubuque  and  we  the  undersigned  notary. 

Fr.  Saucier. 

Extract  of  the  Registers  of  the  Magistracy  of  Cahokia. 

To-day  the  third  day  of  the  month  of  April,  1781,  there  ap- 
peared at  the  office  of  this  Court  M.  Pierre  Prevost,  bearer  of  a 
letter  addressed  to  him  and  signed  Thomas  Bentley,  dated  the 
14th   of  December,    1780,   containing  what  follows:    Sir:     M. 


476  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Ce  Quil  Suit.  Monsieur-Le  Sieur  Dejean  propose  de  vous  envoyer 
au  detroit  porter  des  Lettres,  Comme  il  vous  Connoit  et  que  Je  Lui 
ait  dit  que  vous  Eti^  for  [sic]  Capable  de  faire  ce  voyage,  il  vous 
donnera  douze  cent  frans,  cest  un  Bon  prix  je  vous  Conseille  de  Le 
faire.  vous  me  rendre  Service  aussi,  attendu  que  Je  veux  Ecrire 
pour  des  marchandises;  vous  ne  risque  rien,  nous  vous  conceillerons 
de  fafon  quil  ne  vous  arivera  rien;  Si  vous  vous  Decide  a  y  aller 
venes  ici  tout  de  Suitte;  vous  pourres  engager  un  Sauvage  aux 
Cahos  pour  vour  guider  attendu  quil  faut  que  vous  passie  par  Le 
meme  Chemin  que  vous  ave  pris  avec  Le  Colonel  Labalme;  M^ 
Dejean  ne  veut  pas  que  vous  passid  par  Le  poste,  attendu  que  Ce 
Chemin  n  'est  pas  pratiquable  a  causes  des  Eaux,  D  'ailleur  il  est 
trop  Long:  Si  vous  Croye  ne  pas  pouvoir  avoir  un  Sauvage,  tache 
d'avoir  un  Blanc  pour  vous  guider.  Si  vous  ne  voules  pas  y  aller 
faitte  nous  reponce  tous  de  Suitte  Je  Suis  votre  Serviteur. 

Signe)  T  Bentley. 
Ce  requerant  Led*  Sieur  pierre  prevost  insinuation  de  Laditte 
Lettre  Lecture  faitte  D'icelle  en  notre  Greffe  nous  L'avons  insinue 
Sur  Les  registre  des  insinuations  de  Se  siege  Suivant  L'ordon- 
nance  pour  Servir  et  valoir  ce  que  de  raison  dont  acte  Le  dit 
Jour  et  an.  fr  saucier  N  P. 

Folio  14,  Cahos  1781. 

Extrait  des  registre  de  La  Juridiction  Des  Cahos. 

aujourd  'huy  troisieme  Jour  du  moi  d  'avril  Mil  sept  Cent  qua- 
trevingt  un  est  Comparu  au  Greffe  de  se  Siege  Le  Sieur  pierre 
Prevost  porteur  D'une  Lettre  adresse  a  M""^  Les  habitant  Des 
Illinois  En  General  et  particulierement  a  Ceux  Des  Caskaskia 
Contenant  Se  qui  Suite. 

du  fort  Jefferson  le  ii  Jan  1781 

Mes  chers  amis  et  Compatriotes. 

Cest  avec  Le  plus  profond  regret  que  Jay  appris  que  vous 
Estes  vole  et  pillie,  par  ceux  que  vous  appelles  nos  Gens,  soyes ' 
bien   assures  que  Jen  ressens  Beaucoup  de  peine,  et  que  Jem- 

1  The  letter  is  another  proof  that  Bentley  maintained  his  connections  with  Canada  while 
asserting  his  fidelity  to  the  States.     See  Introduction,  p.  xcvi. 

2  This  is  a  reference  to  the  exactions  of  Bentley,  Dodge,  and  Rogers.  See  Introduction^ 
p.  xcv. 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  APRIL,  1781  477 

Dejean  proposes  to  send  you  to  Detroit  to  carry  some  letters, 
since  he  knows  you  and  I  have  said  to  him  that  you  are  com- 
petent to  make  this  journey.  He  will  give  you  twelve  hundred 
francs;  it  is  a  good  price  and  I  advise  you  to  do  it.  You  will 
render  me  a  service  also  seeing  that  I  wish  to  write  for  some 
merchandise.  You  risk  nothing.  We.  will  advise  you  so  that 
nothing  will  happen  to  you.  If  you  decide  to  go  there,  come  here 
at  once.  You  can  engage  a  savage  at  Cahokia  to  guide  you  seeing 
that  it  is  necessary  for  you  to  travel  by  the  same  road  which  you 
took  with  Colonel  Labalme.  M.  Dejean  does  not  wish  you  to 
pass  by  the  Post,  since  that  road  is  not  practicable  on  account  of 
water;  besides  it  is  too  long.  If  you  think  you  cannot  get  a 
savage,  try  to  get  a  white  man  to  guide  you.  If  you  do  not  wish 
to  go  there,  send  us  an  answer  at  once.     I  am  your  servant. 

(Signed)  T.  Bentley^ 
The  said  M.  Pierre  Prevost  requiring  the  registration  of  the  said 
letter,  after  reading  was  made  thereof  in  our  office,  we  have  in- 
scribed it  in  the  record  of  registrations  of  this  Court  in  compliance 
with  the  ordinance,  that  it  may  be  used  and  have  its  effect  of 
which  this  act  will  testify,  the  said  day  and  year. 

Fr.  Saucier,  N.  P. 

(Folio  14,  Cahokia  178 1.) 

Extract  of  the  Registers  of  the  Magistracy  of  Cahokia. 

To-day  the  third  day  of  the  month  of  April,  1781,  there  ap- 
peared at  the  office  of  this  Court  M.  Pierre  Prevost,  bearer  of  a 
letter  addressed  to  MM.  the  inhabitants  of  the  Illinois  in  general 
and  particularly  to  those  of  Kaskaskia,  containing  what  follows : 

Fort  Jefferson,  Jan.  11,  1781. 

My  dear  friends  and  compatriots: 

It  is  with  the  most  profound  regret  that  I  have  learned  that  you 
are  robbed  and  pillaged  by  those  whom  you  call  our  people.^  Be 
well  assured  that  I  feel  great  grief  about  it  and  that  I  shall  employ 
my  efforts  to  remedy  the  causes  of  all  your  complaints  and  grie- 
vances. M.  Kennedy  has  always  been  duly  authorized  to  conduct 
all  our  public  business  in  your  country.  He  has  at  present  my 
instructions  to  make  the  purchase  of  supplies  for  our  garrison. 


478  ILLINOIS  HiSTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

ploiray  tous  mes  Efforts  pour  remedier  a  touttes  Vos  plaintes  et 
tous  vos  Griefs;  Monsieur  Kenedy  a  tourjour  6te  duement  autorise 
pour  gerer  touttes  nos  affaires  publique  dans  votre  pays,  il  a  actuel- 
lement  mes  instruction  pour  faire  L'achapt  des  vivres  pour  notre 
Garnison,  Je  vous  prie  de  le  Crediter,  Car  Jay  toutte  ma  Con- 
fiance  en  Sa  Bonne  Conduitte,  et  Ses  abilites,  particulierement 
parcequ'il  a  ete  Longtems  un  de  vos  Concitoyens;  J'auray  tou- 
jours  Egard  a  vos  plaintes,  et  tant  quil  Sera  a  mon  pouvoir  Jy  met- 
teray  ordre,  mais  Comme  Le  Colonel  dark  Sera  avec  nous  de  bon 
printems,  Je  Suis  persuade  quil  vous  donnera  une  ample  Satisfac- 
tion de  touttes  Les  injures  que  vous  a  reellement  faites.  fies  vous 
d  'un  antiers  et  generaux  payement  pour  toutes  Les  provisions  que 
M^  Kenedy  aura  achettes  ches  vous  et  Soyes  assures  de  La  bien- 
viellance  du  Gouvernment  Envers  vous.  Permette  moy  L'hon- 
neur  de  me  souscrire  mes  Chers  amis  et  Compatriotes  Votre  tres 
humble  et  tres  obeissant  Serviteur  Et  Sincere  amy. 

Signe  Robert  George     Cap"^  Commandant 

Vray  Copie  traduitte  de  Langlais  par,  signe  J  Gerault. 

aux  Kas  Le  24  Janvier  1781 

Ce  requerant  Led*  Sieur  pierre  Prevost  insinuation  de  la  Ditte 
Lettre,  Lecture  faitte  d'icelle  En  notre  Greffe  nous  L'avons  in- 
sinue  et  enregistre  sur  Les  registre,  des  insinuation  de  Se  Siege  Sui- 
vant  L'ordonnance  pour  Servir  et  valoir  ce  que  de  raison  Dont 
acte,  Ledit  Jour  et  an.  fr.  saucier  N  P. 

Extrait  des  registre  de  La  Juridiction  des  Cahos. 

aujourd  'buy  quatrieme  Jour  du  mois  d  'avril  est  Comparu  au 
Greffe  de  Se  Siege  Le  Sieur  pierre  prevost  porteur  D  'un  pouvoir 
a  Luy  Donne  par  Les  habitant  des  Cahos  pour  representer  Leurs 

(Folio  15,  Cahos  1781.) 

Griefs  au  Gouvernement  de  Virginie  Contenant  Se  qui  Suit.  Je 
moy  francois  trottier  Commandant  du  district  des  Cahos  a  la 
requisition  du  public,  ayant  assemble  Les  Citoyens  dud*  district 
pour  nomer  une  personne  pour  representer  nos  Griefs  au  Gouverne- 
ment de  Virginie   Et   Congres  des  Etats  unis  de  L'amerique  si 

1  Robert  George  was  a  native  of  Virginia  and  a  kinsman  of  George  Rogers  Clark.  He 
was  a  skilled  gunner  and  enlisted  in  the  regular  army.     He  was  sent  with  James  Willing  to 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  APRIL,  1781  479 

I  pray  you  to  trust  him,  for  I  have  all  confidence  in  his  good  con- 
duct and  his  ability,  particularly  because  he  has  been  for  a  long 
time  one  of  your  fellow  citizens.  I  shall  always  give  attention  to 
your  complaints  and  so  far  as  it  will  be  in  my  power  I  will  see 
thereto;  but  since  Colonel  Clark  will  be  with  you  in  the  spring, 
I  am  persuaded  that  he  will  give  you  full  satisfaction  for  all  in- 
juries which  have  been  really  made  you.  Count  on  entire  and 
generous  payment  for  all  the  provisions  which  M.  Kennedy  shall 
have  bought  from  you  and  be  assured  of  the  good-will  of  the 
government  toward  you.  Allow  me  the  honor,  my  dear  friends 
and  compatriots,  of  signing  myself  your  very  humble  and  very 
obedient  servant  and  sincere  friend.     Signed  Robert  George.^ 

Captain  Commandant. 

True  copy  translated  from  the  English  by  (Signed)  J.  Gerault. 
At  Kaskaskia  January  24,  1781. 

The  said  M.  Pierre  Prevost  requiring  the  registration  of  the  said 
letter,  after  reading  was  made  of  it  in  our  office,  we  have  inscribed 
and  registered  it  in  the  record  of  registrations  of  this  Court  in 
compliance  with  the  ordinance,  that  it  may  be  used  and  have  its 
effect,  of  which  this  act  will  testify,  the  said  day  and  year. 

Fr.  Saucier,  N.  P. 

Extract  of  the  Register  of  the  Magistracy  of  Cahokia. 

To-day  the  fourth  day  of  the  month  of  April  there  appeared 
at  the  office  of  this  Court  M.  Pierre  Prevost,  bearer  of  a  warrant 
given  to  him  by  the  inhabitants  of  Cahokia  to  represent  their 

(Folio  15  Cahokia,  1781.) 

grievances  to  the  government  of  Virginia  containing  what  follows : 
I,  Francois  Trottier,  Commandant  of  the  district  of  Cahokia,  at 
the  requistition  of  the  public,  have  assembled  the  citizens  of  the 
said  district  in  order  to  name  a  person  to  represent  our  grievances 
to  the  government  of  Virginia,  and  to  the  Congress  of  the  United 
States  of  America  if  need  be.  Consequently  we  have  named  and 
do  name  M.  Pierre  Prevost  to  whom  we  give  power  to  make  for 

attack  the  British  posts  on  the  Mississippi  in  1778.  On  his  return  he  joined  Clark  in  Illinois 
and  served  through  the  war.  This  letter  won  him  the  good  will  of  the  French,  and  it  is  men- 
tioned particularly  in  the  memorial  sent  by  the  people  of  Kaskaskia  to  the  governor  of  Vir- 
ginia.— Menard  Col.  Tard.  Papers.  George  died  in  Utica,  Ind. — English,  Conquest  of  the 
Northwest,  i,  366. 


48o  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Besoin  Est;  En  Consequence  nous  avons  unanimement  nommdes 
et  nommons  Le  Sieur  pierre  prevost  auquel  nous  donnons  pouvoir 
de  pour  nous  Et  en  notre  nom,  Lieu  et  place,  faire  nos  representa- 
tion audit  Gouvernement  de  Virginie  ou  autres  endroits  quil  Sera 
necessaire  Suivant  nos  Droits  Conformement  au  Loix  naturel  et 
Coutumes  de  ce  pays;  nous  Luy  recommendon  Exprecement  de 
Sinterresser  pour  nous,  pour  tout  Ce  qui  regarde  nos  interest 
premierement,  de  La  fa^on  que  nous  avons  ref ue,  noury,  et  Log^ 
Les  troupes  de  L'etat  de  Virginie  Et  Comme  nous  avons  Et6 
paye  avec  de  Largent  qui  ne  nous  a  ete  d'aucune  Valeur,  Ce  qui 
nous  a  ruine  Totallement  et  nous  mis  presentement  hors  d'Etat 
de  faire  Subsister  nos  femmes  et  nos  families,  nous  ayant  ete  promis 
par  Les  personnes  en  place  que  Ses  fournitures  nous  Seroient  paye 
En  marchandise  a  Bonne  Composition,  au  Contraire  Ces  memes 
Marchandises,  disoit  on  destine  pour  nous  nont  Servie  qu'a  re- 
tirer  La  plus  grande  partie  a  Ces  papiers  a  vil  prix  ce  qui  ne  Sera 
pas  difl&cile  a  Luy  de  prouver;  Ce  que  nous  Consentons  quil  face 
avec  toute  verite  et  equitte  possible,  Luy  Donnant  tout  pouvoir  a 
cette  Effest,  promettant  avoir  tout  ce  qui  Sira  fait  par  Ledit  Sieur 
prevost  pour  agreable  EtLe  ratifier  Si  Besoin  Est;  Et  pourLe  recon- 
noitre des  Service  quil  Veut  Bien  nous  rendre,  nous  Luy  allouons 
une  piastre   Gourde  pour  Chaqu'ne  de  Ses  journees  a  Compter 

(Folio  i6,  Cahos  1781.) 

du  Jour  de  Son  depart  de  ce  poste,  Jusqu  'a  son  arrive,  Et  Ce  pay- 
able a  Son  retour  Ce  dont  nous  Sommes  Convenue,  et  avons  Signe 
aux  Cahos  Le  3.  D'avril  1781.  signe  fr  trottier,  p  B^^  Lacroix, 
armant,  beaulieu,  j  b  mercie,  Langlois,  Jervais,  dubuc,  Jn.  Lepage 
L.  trogue,  B  Saucier,  Isaac  Levy,  P.  martin,  George  Blin,  une  + 
pour  Marque  de  francois  Courie  une  idem  pour  S^  Lapence,  une 
idem  pour  ant  Boyee  une  autre  idem  pour  J^  poirie,  une  idem 
pour  Loui  gau,  une  autre  idem  pour  Clem*  Alary,  une  idem  pour 
Louis  pillet,  une  autre  idem  pour  piere  Dorion,  une  idem  pour 
pierre  roy,  une  idem  pour  jean  Dehay,  une  idem  pour  S^  Cecire, 
une  idem  pour  Ch^^  Butau  une  autre  idem  pour  Louis  Lebrun. 

1  This  petition  was  carried  by  Pierre  Prevost  and  Richard  McCarty.  McCarty  was 
attacked  by  the  Indians  and  killed,  and  his  papers  were  captured.  I  do  not  know  whether 
the  petition  was   sent  later  to  the  governor  or  not.     See  Introduction,  p.  ciii. 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  APRIL,  1781  481 

us  and  in  our  name  and  stead  our  representation  to  the  said 
government  of  Virginia  or  other  places  that  it  shall  be  necessary 
according  to  our  rights  conformably  to  the  natural  law  and  cus- 
toms of  this  country.  We  recommend  him  expressly  to  interest 
himself  for  us  and  for  all  that  which  concerns  our  interests:  firstly 
by  telling  how  we  have  received,  nourished  and  lodged  the 
troops  of  the  State  of  Virginia  and  how  we  have  been  paid  with 
money  which  has  been  of  no  value  to  us,  which  has  ruined  us 
totally  and  put  us  out  of  condition  now  to  support  our  wives  and 
families;  and  that  we  were  promised  by  persons  in  position  that 
these  supplies  would  be  paid  for  in  merchandise  at  a  fair  settle- 
ment, but  that  this  same  merchandise,  which  they  said  was  destin- 
ed for  us,  was  used  only  for  retiring  the  greatest  part  of  this  paper 
at  a  low  price,  a  proceeding  which  it  will  not  be  difficult  for  him  to 
prove  and  which  we  consent  that  he  do  with  all  truth  and  equity 
possible,  giving  him  all  power  to  this  effect.  And  we  promise  to 
sanction  all  that  shall  be  done  by  the  said  M.  Prevost  and  to  ratify 
it,  if  need  be.  And  to  recompense  him  for  the  services  which  he 
agrees  to  render  us,  we  allow  him  a  piastre  gourde   for  each 

(Folio  16,  Cahokia,  1781.) 

day  counting  from  the  day  of  his  departure  from  this  post 
until  his  arrival,  and  this  payable  on  his  return.  This  we  have 
agreed  and  have  signed  at  Cahokia  the  3d  of  April,  1781.  Signed, 
Fr.  Trottier,  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  Harmand,  Beaulieu,  J.  B.  Mercier, 
Langlois,  Gervais,  Dubuque,  Jean  Lepage,  L.  Troge,  B.  Saucier, 
Isaac  Levy,  P.  Martin,  George  Blin,  a  4-  for  mark  of  Francois 
Courier,  the  same  for  M.  Lapance,  the  same  for  Ant.  Boyer, 
another  for  Jean  Poirier,  the  same  for  Louis  Gaud,  another  for 
Clem.  Alarie,  the  same  for  Louis  Pillet,  another  for  Pierre  Dorion, 
the  same  for  Pierre  Roy,  the  same  for  Jean  Deshayes,  the  same 
for  M,  Cesirre,  the  same  for  Ch.  Buteau,  another  for  Louis 
Lebrun.^ 

The  said  M.  Pierre  Prevost  requiring  the  registration  of  the 
said  commission,  after  reading  was  made  of  it  in  our  office  we 
have  inscribed  and  registered  it  in  the  record  of  registrations  of 
this  Court  in  compliance  with  the  ordinance,  that  it  may  be  used 


482  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Ce  requerant  Led*  Sieur  pierre  Prevost  insinuation  du  dit  pou- 
voir,  Lecture  faitte  de  celuy  en  notre  Greffe  nous  L'avons 
insinue  et  enregistr^  Sur  Les  registre  des  insinuations  de  Se  Siege 
Suivant  L  'ordonnance  pour  servir  et  valoir  ce  que  de  raison-  dont 
acte,  Le  dit  Jour  Et  ans.  fr.  saucier 

Extrait  des  registres  de  la  Juridiction  des  Cahos. 

aujourd'huy  vingt  Cinq  du  mois  de  mars  mil  Sept  Cent  quatre- 
vingt  deux  Est  Comparu  au  Gref  de  ce  Siege  Sieur  Joseph  motard 
porteur  dune  procuration  passe  par  devant  le  notaire  Soussign^ 
Le  vingt  trois  du  present  Contenant  Ce  qui  Suit,  pardevant  Le 
notaire  Soussigne  aux  village  des  Cahokia  et  En  presence  des 
temoins  soussigne  nome,  fut  present  en  Sa  personne  Sieur  Joseph 
motard  negocient  cy  devant  resident  a  S*  Louis,  Lequel  a  par  ces 
presentes  fait  et  Constituer  son  procureur  General  Et  Spatial  La 
personne  de  Mons^  michel  Beaullieu  habitant  Demeurant  au 
Susdit  Lieu  des  Cahokia,  auquel  il  donne  pouvoir  de  pour  Luy 
et  En  son  nom  demender  Et  recevoir,  et  Se  faire  rendre  Compte 
par  Monsieur  DuBreiiil  S*  Cyr  des  Sommes  dont  il  aura  Ete  paye 

(Folio  17,  Cah63  1782.) 

suivant  Letat  qui  Luy  a  Ete  remis  par  mondit  Sieur  motard  Et 
Son  refeu  au  Bas  toutte  fois  que  ce  ne  Sera  que  Lorsque  Mondit 
Sieur  DuBreiiil  S*  Cyr  partira  du  pays  a  moin  que  La 
paix  ne  Ce  fasse  avant  Et  que  Ledit  Sieur  procureur  Constituer 
trouve  occasion  de  faire  parvenir  a  mondit  Sieur  motard  en  europe 
Les  Sommes  que  mondit  Sieur  DuBreiiil  S*  Cyr  aura  Entre  Les 
main  suivant  Led*  Etat  quil  En  a  regeu,  Et  au  Cas  de  depart  dudit 
Sieur  avant  La  paix,  sera  Loisible  aud*  procureur  Constituer  de 
remetre  a  tel  personne  quil  Jugera  a  propos  La  ditte  Somme  moye- 
nant  assurance  ou  de  la  Garder  Luy  meme  Jusqu'a  ce  quil  a 
puisse  faire  tenir  aud*  Sieur  motard  promettant  aprouver  et  rati- 
fier  Comme  il  aprouve  Et  ratifie  tout  Ce  qui  Sera  fait  au  moyens 
Des  presentes  Sans  quil  Soit  Besoin  d'un  pouvoir  plus  Special  fait 
et  passe  En  etude  aux  Cahos  L  'an  mil  Sept  Cent  quatrevingt  deux 
Le  vingt  trois  du  mois  de  mars  apres  midy  en  presence  de  M""^ 

^  The  passage  is  very  obscure  and  the  translation  has  therefore  been  made  as  literal  as 
possible. 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  MARCH,  1782  483 

and  have  its  effect,  of  which  this  act  will  testify,  the  said  day 
and  year. 

Fr.  Saucier. 

Extract  of  the  Registers  of  the  Magistracy  of  Cahokia. 

To-day  the  twenty-fifth  of  the  month  of  March,  1782,  there 
appeared  at  the  office  of  this  Court  M.  Joseph  Motard,  bearer 
of  a  power  of  attorney  passed  before  the  undersigned  notary,  the 
twenty-third  of  the  present  month,  containing  what  follows: 
Before  the  undersigned  notary  at  the  village  of  Cahokia  and 
in  the  presence  of  the  undersigned  and  named  witnesses,  there 
was  present  in  his  person  M.  Joseph  Motard,  merchant  hitherto 
residing  in  St.  Louis,  who  has  by  these  presents  made  and  consti- 
tuted his  attorney,  general  and  special,  the  person  of  M.  Michel 
Beaulieu,  inhabitant  domiciled  in  the  aforesaid  place  of  Cahokia, 
to  whom  he  gives  power  for  him  and  in  his  name  to  demand  and 
receive  and   to  cause  to  be  rendered   to  him  an  account  by  M. 

(Folio  17,  Cahokia,  1782.) 

Dubreuil  St.  Cyr  of  the  sums  which  he  shall  have  been  paid  accor- 
ding to  the  statement,  which  has  been  delivered  to  him  (Beaulieu) 
by  the  said  M.  Motard,  with  his  receipt  below ;  provided  this  shall 
only  be  valid  when  the  said  M.  Dubreuil  St.  Cyr  shall  set  out  from 
the  country,  unless  the  peace  is  made  before,  and  provided  the 
said  constituted  attorney  find  occasion  to  send  to  the  saidM.  Motard 
in  Europe  the  sums  which  M.  Dubreuil  St.  Cyr  shall  have  in  his 
hands  according  to  the  said  statement  which  he  has  received ;  ^ 
and  in  case  of  the  departure  of  the  said  gentlemen  before 
the  peace,  it  will  be  permissible  to  the  said  constituted  attorney  to 
confide  to  such  person  whom  he  judges  fitting  the  said  sum,  pro- 
vided he  receives  security,  or  to  keep  it  himself  until  he  can  put 
it  in  the  possession  of  M.  Motard,  who  promises  to  approve  and 
ratify,  as  he  approves  and  ratifies,  that  which  shall  be  done 
by  means  of  this  present  without  there  being  need  of  a  more  spe- 
cial power.  Made  and  passed  in  the  ofl&ce  at  Cahokia  in  the  year, 
1782,  on  the  twenty-third  of  the  month  of  March  in  the  afternoon, 
in  the  presence  of  MM.  Matthieu  Saucier  and  Francois  Lapance, 
witnesses  summoned  for  this,  who  have  signed  with  us,  notary,  after 


484  ILLINOIS  lilSTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

math.  Saucier  et  francois  Lapanc^  temoins  a  Ce  requis  qui  ont  Sign^ 
Et  nous  notaire  Lecture  faitte  Sign^  a  Loriginal  J  motard  mth. 
Saucier  francois  Lapanc^  Et  fr  saucier  notaire.  Et  plus  Bas  Est 
ecrit  en  outre  led*  Sieur  motard  a  declare  devoir  audit  Sieur  Beaul- 
lieu  La  Somme  de  Cinq  Cent  Livres  par  Son  Billet  Laquelle  ditte 
Somme  il  prendra  Sur  celle  quil  recevra  de  m^  DuBreuil  S*  Cyr 
Et  a  signe  Le  Jour  et  an  Et  Laditte  Somme  de  Cinq  Cent  Livres 
demender  quand  il  Le  voudra  Ce  requerant  Ledit  Sieur  J.  motard 
insinuation  de  laditte  procuration  Lecture  faitte  di  celuy  en  notre 
Gref  nous  I'avons  insinue  Et  enregistre  Sur  Les  registres  Des 
insinuation  de  Ce  Siege  Suivant  L'ordonnance  pour  Servir  Et 
valoir  ce  que  de  raison  dont  acte  ledit  Jour  et  ans. 

fr  saucier 


Extrait  des  registre  de  la  Juridiction  des  Cahos. 

au  Jourd'huy  Cinq  du  mois  de  Septembre  mil  Sept  Cent  quartre 
vingt  deux  Est  Comparu  au  Gref  de  ce  Siege  sieur  Gabriel  Cerre 
porteur  d'une  obligation  de  Sieur  ant.  armant,  a  la  Suitte  de 
laquelle  il  Contient  Ce  qui  suit,  ayant  Ete  Condanne  par  la 
Cour  de  payer  la  ditte  obligation,  Je  moblige  Sous  I'hipoteque 
de  tous  mes  Biens  Generallement  payer  au  Sieur  Gabriel  Cerre 
La    Somme  de  mil   Six  Cent  quarente  Six  livres  En  argent  Et 

(Folio  18,  Cahos  1782.) 

I'interest  de  laditte  Somme  dans  un  an  de  Cette  datte  Sans  que 
Tune  obligation  Deroge  a  I'autre  Et  pour  plus  Grande  Surete, 
Jay  par  ces  presentes  hypoteque  plus  Spetialement  ma  maison 
Sise  et  Situe  au  village  de  Caho  tenant  d  'un  cotte  a  Jean  Lapence 
Et  de  L'autre  Separe  par  une  rue  aux  Caho  le  5  7^^^  1782  Ahar- 
mand.  Et  plus  Bas  Est  ecrit,  Je  Soussigne  que  la  rente  de  la 
Somme  Si  dessu  ma  ete  paye  Jusqua  ce  Jour  au  Caho  le  5  7^^^ 
1782.  Cerre.  ce  requerant  Led*  Sieur  Cerre  insinuation  dud* 
obligation.  Lecture  faite  diceluy  En  notre  Gref,  nous  L'avons 
insinue,  et  enregistre  Sur  Les  registres  des  insinuations  de  ce 
Siege  Suivant  l'ordonnance  pour  Servir  et  valoir  ce  que  de  raison 
dont  acte  Le  dit  Jour  Et  ans.  fr  saucier  N  P 

1  See  pp.  13s,  137. 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1782  485 

reading  was  made.  Signed  on  the  original,  J.  Motard,  Mth.  Sau- 
cier, Francois  Lapanc^  and  Fr.  Saucier,  notary.  And  below  is 
written:  Furthermore  the  said  M.  Motard  declared  that  he  owed 
the  said  M.  Beaulieu  the  sum  of  five  hundred  livres  by  his  note, 
which  said  sum  he  shall  take  from  that  which  he  shall  receive 
from  M.  Dubreuil  St.  Cyr,  and  he  has  signed  the  day  and  year, 
and  the  said  sum  of  five  hundred  livres  he  may  demand,  when  he 
shall  wish.  The  said  M.  J.  Motard  requiring  the  registration  of 
the  said  power  of  attorney,  after  reading  thereof  was  made  in  our 
office,  we  have  inscribed  and  registered  it  in  the  record  of  regis- 
trations of  this  Court  in  compliance  with  the  ordinance,  that  it 
may  be  used  and  have  its  effect ,  of  which  this  act  will  testify, 
the  said  day  and  year.  Fr.  Saucier. 

Extract  of  the  Registers  of  the  Magistracy  of  Cahokia. 

To-day  the  fifth  of  the  month  of  September,  1782,  there 
appeared  at  the  office  of  this  Court  M.  Gabriel  Cerre,  bearer  of 
an  obligation  of  M.  Ant.  Harmand,  at  the  end  of  which  is  contained 
what  follows:  Having  been  condemned  by  the  Court  to  pay  the 
said  obligation,^  I  bind  myself  by  the  mortgage  of  all  my  goods 
generally  to  pay  to  M.  Gabriel  Cerrd  the  sum  of  one  thousand 

(Folio  18,  Cahokia,  1782.) 

six  hundred  and  forty-six  livres  in  money  and  the  inter  tst  of  the  said 
sum  in  a  year  from  this  date,  without  one  obligation  being  deroga- 
tory to  the  other;  and  for  greater  surety  I  have,  by  these  presents, 
mortgaged  more  specially  my  house  situated  in  the  village  of 
Cahokia,  on  the  one  side  adjoining  Jean  Lapance's  and  on  the  other 
separated  by  a  street.  At  Cahokia,  the  5th  of  September,  1782. 
A.  Harmand.  And  below  is  written:  I,  the  undersigned, 
[acknowledge]  that  the  interest  of  the  above  sum  has  been  paid 
me  up  to  this  day.  At  Cahokia,  September  5,  1782.  Cerre. 
The  said  M.  Cerre  requiring  the  registration  of  this  obligation, 
after  reading  was  made  thereof  in  our  office,  we  have  inscribed  and 
registered  it  in  the  record  of  registrations  of  this  Court  in  com- 
pliance with  the  ordinance,  that  it  may  be  used  and  have  its 
effect,  of  which  this  act  will  testify,  the  said  day  and  year. 

Fr.  Saucier,  N.  P. 


486  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Extrait  des  Registres  de  la  Juridiction  des  cahos. 

Aujourd'huy  huitiesme  jour  de  Novembre  mil  sept  cent  quatre 
vingt  deux  est  comparu  au  greffe  de  ce  siege  le  Sr  Joseph  Labuxiere 
procureur  des  Etats  des  virginie  porteur  de  Sa  commission  Lequel 
En  vertu  de  la  Sentence  de  Messieurs  les  Magistrats  de  cette 
Cour  En  datte  du  jour  de  hier  Nous  a  requis  Lenregistrement  de 
Sa  dite  Commission  portant  ce  qui  suit. 

Je  Soussign^  jean  Girault  procureur  pour  LEtat  de  virginie 
En  la  comtd  des  ilinois. 

Lemploy  dofficier  militaire  auquel  il  a  pl^  a  LEtat  de  me 
Nommer  ne  me  permetant  pas  de  pouvoir  plus  longtems  Remplir 
la  place  de  procureur  pour  ledit  Etat  En  la  Comt^  des  ilinois  a 
laquelle  charge  jay  Ete  Nomme  par  commission  en  datte  du 
Cinq  juin  1779.  Etant  d'une  necessity  indispensable  de  Nom- 
mer une  personne  capable  de  me  remplacer  dans  ladite  charge 
Connoisant  la  sage  conduite  Capacite  et  experiance  du  Sr  Joseph 
Labuxiere  Son  Zele  Et  affection  pour  le  service  delEtat  etle  Bien 

(Folio  19,  Cah6s  1782.) 

du  public,  je  luy  Nomme  Et  Nomme  par  ces  presentes  procureur 
dud^  Etat  de  la  virginie  pour  me  remplacer  En  ladite  charge  dans 
tout  letandue  de  la  comte  des  ilinois  En  consequance  requerir 
pour  led*  Etat  de  virginie  tout  ce  qui  est  de  la  competance  de  cette 
charge  tant  en  matieres  Civiles  que  Crimineles  Et  a  cet  Effet 
jouir  de  tons  les  honneurs,  droits,  privileges,  Emolumens  et  prd- 
eminances  y  ataches,  prendre  connoissance  de  toutes  succesions 
vacante,  ou  autres  qui  tomberon  a  lintestat,  En  faire  les  recherches, 
poursuites  et  diligences  et  recouvrement  pour  En  rendre  compte 
a  qui  de  droit  il  apartiendra  Et  pour  le  tout  Se  Conformer  aux 
loix  Et  Statuts  Etablis  par  letat  de  virginie  En  la  susdite  comt^ 
des  ilinois,  prions  M^  Richart  Winston  gouverneur  Civil  En  la 
dite  Comte  de  prouver  notre  Nomination  En  la  personne  dud* 
S^  Joseph  Labuxiere  et  de  le  faire  reconoitore  En  ladite  qualite 
de  procureur  par  tous  les  colons  Et  Sujets  de  ladite  comte  des 
ilinois  Et  tous  autres  quil  apartiendra  En  foy  de  quoy  avons  signe 
la  presente  Commission  et  a  icelle  apose  notre  Cachet  ord^® 
donn^  En  la  ville  des  Caskakias  aux  ilinois  le  vingt  neuf  juin  mil 
sept  cent  quatre  vingt  un.    sign6  Girault. 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1782  487 

Extract  of  the  Registers  of  the  Magistracy  of  Cahokia. 

To-day  the  8th  day  of  November,  1782,  there  appeared  at 
the  office  of  this  Court  M.  Joseph  Labuxiere,-  state's  attorney  of 
Virginia,  bearer  of  his  commission,  and  in  virtue  of  the  decree  of 
the  magistrates  of  this  Court,  yesterday,  he  has  required  of  us  the 
registration  of  his  said  commission,  which  contains  what  follows: 

I,  the  undersigned  Jean  Girault,  attorney  for  the  State  of 
Virginia  in  the  county  of  the  Illinois. 

Since  the  employment  of  military  officer,  to  which  it  has  pleased 
the  State  to  appoint  me,  makes  it  impossible  for  me  to  fill  any 
longer  the  place  of  attorney  for  the  said  State  in  the  county  of 
the  Illinois,  to  which  office  I  was  appointed  by  a  commission 
dated  the  fifth  of  June,  1779;  and  since  it  is  indispensably  neces- 
sary to  appoint  a  person  capable  of  replacing  me  in  the  said 
office  and  I  know  the  wise  conduct,  capacity  and  experience  of  M. 
Joseph  Labuxiere  and  his  zele  and  affection  for  the  service  of 
the  State  and  the  public  welfare,  I  have  appointed  and  do  appoint 
him  by  these  presents  state's  attorney  of  Virginia  to  replace  me 
in  the  said  office  throughout  the  whole  extent  of  the  county  of  Illi- 
nois; and  consequently  to  demand  for  the  said  State  of  Virginia  all 
that  which  belongs  to  the  competence  of  this  office  both  in  matters 
civil  and  criminal;  and  for  this  purpose  to  enjoy  all  the  honors 
rights,  privileges,  emoluments  and  dignities  attached  thereto; 
to  take  cognizance  of  all  estates  in  abeyance  or  others  which 
shall  be  intestate,  to  make  inquiries,  suits,  proceedings  and  recov- 
eries therefor,  in  order  to  render  account  thereof  to  whom  by  right 
it  shall  belong;  and  in  all  things  to  conform  himself  to  the  laws 
and  statutes  established  by  the  State  of  Virginia  in  the  county  of 
Illinois  aforesaid.  We  pray  M.  Richard  Winston,  civil  gover- 
nor in  the  said  county,  to  approve  our  appointment  in  the  person 
of  the  said  M.  Joseph  Labuxiere  and  to  cause  him  to  be  recog- 
nized in  the  said  capacity  of  attorney  by  all  the  colonists  and 
subjects  of  the  said  county  of  Illinois  and  by  all  others  whom 
it  shall  concern.  In  faith  of  which  we  have  signed  the  present 
commission  and  placed  our  seal  thereon.  Given  in  the  village 
of  Kaskaskia  in  the  Illinois,  the  twenty-ninth  of  June  1781, 
Signed  Girault. 


488  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Nous  Richart  Winston  Gouverneur  Civil  En  la  Comt^  des 
ilinois. 

Veu  la  presente  commission  que  nous  avons  homologu^  Et 
homologuons.  En  consequance  avons  receti  Et  recevons  led*  S'^ 
Joseph  Labuxiere  procureur  pour  lEtat  de  virginie  En  la  comt^ 
des  ilinois  Et  Ses  dependances  Sous  le  Sermant  quil  a  presente- 
ment  prete  de  Se  conformer  aux  statuts  Et  reglements  dud*  Etat 
pour  ladite  comte  des  ilinois,  laquelle  reception  nous  avons 
faite  du  Consentement  unanime  des  magistracts  Soussign^z  tenant 
la  cour  de  justice  En  cette  ville  des  caskakias  En  foy  de  quoy 
avons  signe  la  presente  que  nous  avons  scelle  de  Notre  Cachet 
ord^^  Et  delivre  au  s^  Labuxiere  pour  lui  servir  ce  que  de  raison, 
En  la  ville  des  caskakias  aux  ilinois  le  29  juin  1781.  Signe  Richard 
Winston,  Jacques  lasource  magistrat  presid*,  Godin,  janis,  Barbeau, 
Louviere  tous  magistrat  Et  loriginal  de  present  Enregistrement 
delivre  aud*  S''  Laubuxiere  Et  avons  sign6  led*  jour  et  an. 

Labuxiere  fr.  saucier  N.  P. 

(Folio  20,  Cahos  1783.) 

Extrait  des  registres  de  Lajuridiction  des  Caho. 

Aujourd'huy  huitieme  jour  de  novembre  mil  sept  Cent  quatre 
vingt  trois,  Est  Comparu  aux  Greffe  de  Siege  le  Sieur  Charle  Charle- 
ville  demeurant  aux  caskaskia  porteur  d'une  reconnoissance  du 
Sieur  [blank]  pouree,  nous  a  requis  Lenregistrement  de  laditte 
Reconnoissance  portant  Ce  qui  suit. 

Jay  re^eu  de  Monsieur  Charle  Chauvin  Charleville  un  refeu 
de  Monsieur  fagot  de  lagarsseniere,  Consenti  a  mondit  Sieur 
Charle  Chauvin  Charleville  de  la  Somme  de  Vingt  Et  un  Mille 
neuf  Cent  Soixante  Et  dix  Livres  Et  aux  Environs  de  quatre  Cent 
Livres  de  paux  de  chevreuil  Et  un  petit  paquet  de  Castor,  La 
reconnoissance  de  Monsieur  fagot  Lagarceniere  En  datte  du 
huit  aoust  mil  Sept  Cent  soixante  Et  dix  huit.  En  outre  une  pro- 
curation que  ledit  Charleville  ma  donne  pour  pouvoir  poursuivre 
Le  Sieur  fagot  En  Son  nom,  Et  faire  mon  possible  pour  retirer 
La  ditte  somme  suivant  le  receu  de  monsieur  fagot  La  Guarsinaire, 
Si  Je  ne  puis  rien  retirer  de  M^  fagot  Je  remettre  Les  pieces  refeu 
de  mons^  Charleville  a  luy  meme  Et  il  me  remettra  le  present 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1783  489 

We  Richard  Winston,  Civil  Governor  in  the  County  of  Illinois. 

Having  seen  the  present  cbmmission,  we  have  confirmed  and 
do  confirm  it  and  in  consequence  we  have  received  and 
do  receive  the  said  M.  Joseph  Labuxiere  as  attorney  for  the 
State  of  Virginia  in  the  county  of  the  Illinois  and  its  dependencies 
under  the  oath  which  he  has  now  made  to  conform  to  the  statutes 
and  regulations  of  the  said  State  for  the  county  of  Illinois, 
which  reception  we  have  made  with  the  unanimous  consent  of 
the  undersigned  magistrates  holding  the  Court  of  justice  in  this 
village  of  Kaskaskia.  In  faith  of  which  we  have  signed  the 
present  which  we  have  sealed  with  our  seal  and  delivered  to  M. 
Labuxiere  for  his  use,  of  which  this  act  will  testify.  In  the  village 
of  Kaskaskia  in  the  Illinois,  June  29, 1781.  Signed,  Richard  Wins- 
ton, Jacques  Lasource,  presiding  magistrate,  Godin,  Janis,  Barbau, 
Louviere,  all  magistrates,  and  the  original  of  the  present  registry 
was  delivered  to  the  said  M.  Labuxiere;  and  we  have  signed  the 
said  day  and  year. 

Labuxiere  Fr.  Saucier,  N.  P. 

(FoUo  20,  Cahokia,  1783.) 

Extract  of  the  Registers  of  the  Magistracy  of  Cahokia. 

To-day,  the  eighth  of  November,  1783,  there  appeared  at  the 
office  pf  [this]  Court  M.  Charles  Charleville,  residing  in  Kaskaskia, 
bearer  of  a  receipt  from  M.  [blank]  Pouree,  and  he  has  required  of 
us  the  registration  of  the  said,  receipt  which  contains  what  follows : 

I  have  received  from  M.  Charles  Chauvin  Charleville  a  receipt 
of  M.  Fagot  de  Lagarceniere  given  to  the  said  M.  Charles  Chauvin 
Charleville  for  the  sum  of  twenty-one  thousand  nine  hundred  and 
seventy  livres  and  about  four  hundred  pounds  of  deer-skins  and  a 
small  package  of  beaver.  The  receipt  of  M.  Fagot  de  Lagarcen- 
iere bears  date  of  the  eighth  of  August,  1778;  furthermore  a  power 
of  attorney  which  the  said  Charleville  gave  me  to  empower  me  to 
sue  M.  Fagot  in  his  name  and  to  do  my  best  to  obtain  the  said 
sum  according  to  the  receipt  of  M.  Fagot  de  Lagarceniere.  If  I 
can  do  nothing  about  obtaining  the  sum  from  M.  Fagot,  I  shall 
return  the  papers  received  from  M.  Charleville  to  him  and  he  will 
return  the  present.     Made  at  St.  Genevieve  January  i,  1782. 


490  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

fait  a  S**^  Genevieve  le  i  Janvier  1782.  sign^  lugirre  pouree,  Ce 
requerant  Ledit  Sieur  Charleville  insinuation  de  Laditte  recon- 
noissance  Lecture  faitte  diceluy  En  notre  Greffe  nous  Lavons 
insinue  Et  Enregistrd  sur  les  registre  des  insinuation,  De  ce  Siege 
suivant  L'ordonnance  pour  servir  Et  valoir  ce  que  de  raison  dont 
acte  Led*  jour  Et  ans. 

fr.  saucier  N.  p. 
Extrait  des  registres  de  la  jurisdiction  des  Cahos. 

aujourdhuy  dixieme  jour  de  Novembre  mil  sept  cent  quartre 
vingt  trois  est  comparu  le  s^  Joseph  Labuxiere  N^^  Lequel  Nous 
a  Requis  lenregistrement  de  la  commission  qui  suit. 

Veu  la  requete  a  nous  presentee  par  le  s^  Joseph  Labuxiere 
en  datte  du  10  x^^^  1782.  sachant  que  le  gouvernement  n'a  Rien 
de  plus  a  coeur  que  de  donner  aisance  a  tous  Ses  Sujets  de  gag- 
ner  leur  vie  honestement,  de  chercher,  obtenir  et  posseder.  le 
Bonheur  partout  ou  ils  pouront  L'avoir,  et  les  assister  de  Son 
authorite  et  puissance  pour  que  chacun  puisse  exercer  Ses  talans 
et  etre  util  a  la  societe. 

En  vertu  du  pouvoir  a  Nous  donne  par  M^  jean  Tood  Ecuyer 

(Folio  21,  Cah6s  1784.) 

gouverneur  Civil  En  la  comte  des  ilinois  et  Ses  dependances 
Nous  avons  permis  et  permetons  a  M^  Joseph  Labuxiere  pere 
dEtablir  un  Notaria  en  cette  dite  comte  a  lendroit  ou  il  fera  Sa 
residance  et  a  cette  fin  de  passer  et  recevoir  en  qualite  de  Notaire 
public  dans  toute  Lentendue  de  ladite  comte  et  district  tous  actes 
contracts  Et  invantaires  partages,  Encan,  Et  generalement  tout 
ce  qui  est  de  la  competance  dun  Notaire  sans  que  personne  puisse 
sy  oposer,  Letat  voulant  que  chaque  individu  jouisse  dune  plaine 
liberty  de  metre  Sa  confience  en  tel  Notaire  quil  jugera  a  propos 
en  concequance  avons  ce  jourdhuy  recu  le  sermant  d'office  dud* 
S'^  Labuxiere  qui  a  promis  et  jure  de  Se  conformer  aux  Statuts  du 
gouvernement  Et  usages  acoutumes,  et  Sera  libre  en  Cas  din- 
compatibilite  de  Substituer  une  personne  pour  faire  les  fonctions 
de  procureur'de  I'Etat  dans  les  affaires  qui  le  requereront  et  ou  il 
ne  pouroit  exercer  les  deux  charges  dans  une  meme  affaire  en  foy 
de  quoy  Nous  luy  avons  delivre  la  presente  Commission  ainsy  que 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  NOVEMBER,  1783  491 

Signed  Leger  [?  ]  Pour^e.  The  said  M.  Charleville  requiring  the 
registration  of  the  said  receipt,  after  reading  was  made  thereof  in 
our  office,  we  have  inscribed  and  registered  it  in  the  record  of  regis- 
trations of  this  Court  in  compUance  with  the  ordinance,  that  it 
may  be  used  and  have  its  effect,  of  which  this  act  will  testify,  the 
said  day  and  year. 

Fr.  Saucier,  N.  P. 

Extract  of  the  Registers  of  the  Magistracy  of  Cahokia. 

To-day,  the  tenth  of  November,  1783,  there  appeared  M. 
Joseph  Labuxiere,  who  has  required  of  us  the  registration  of  the 
commission  which  follows : 

Having  seen  the  petition  presented  to  us  by  M.  Joseph  Labux- 
iere under  date  of  December  10,  1782,  and  knowing  that  the 
government  has  desired  nothing  more  than  to  give  facility  to  all 
its  subjects  to  gain  their  livelihood  honestly  and  to  seek,  obtain 
and  possess  happiness  wherever  they  can  obtain  it,  and  to  assist 
them  with  its  authority  and  power  in  order  that  each  may  exercise 
his  talents  and  be  useful  to  society : 

In  virtue  of  the  power  given  to  us  by  M.  John  To^d  Esquire, 

(Folio  21,  Cahokia,  1784.) 

civil  governor  in  the  county  of  Illinois  and  its  dependencies, 
we  have  permitted  and  do  permit  M.  Joseph  Labuxiere  Senior, 
to  establish  a  notariat  in  this  said  county  at  the  place  where  he 
shall  have  his  residence  and  to  this  end  to  draw  up  and  receive  in 
his  capacity  of  notary  public,  throughout  the  extent  of  the  said 
county  and  district,  all  instruments,  contracts  and  inventories, 
settlements,  auctions  and  in  general  to  do  all  that  which  belongs 
to  the  competence  of  a  notary,  without  any  person  being  per- 
mitted to  make  opposition  thereto;  for  the  State  wishes  that  each 
person  enjoy  full  liberty  to  place  his  confidence  in  such  notary  as 
he  shall  judge  fitting.  In  consequence  we  have  this  day  received 
the  oath  of  office  from  the  said  M.  Labuxiere,  who  has  promised 
and  sworn  to  conform  himself  to  the  statutes  of  government  and 
customary  usages ;  and  he  shall  be  free,  in  case  of  incompatibility, 
to  substitute  some  one  to  perform  the  functions  of  state's  attorney 
in  the  affairs  which  require  one,  and  where  he  cannot  exercise 


492  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

de  Raison  que  nous  avons  sign^  et  Scelld  de  Notre  Cachet  ordinaire 
aux  Caskakia  le  douze  decembre  mil  sept  cent  Cent  [sic]  quatre 
vingt  deux,  signe  sur  la  commission  Richard  Winston  Lieutenant 
de  Compte.  Laquelle  Commission  nous  avons  Enregistree  Et  remis 
loriginal  aud*  s^  Labuxiere  pour  luy  servir  ce  que  de  raison  Et 
avoir  recour  a  lenregistrement  cy  dessus  En  cas  de  Besoin  dont 
acte  lesd*  jour  et  an. 

fr.  saucier  N'"^. 

Extrait  des  Registres  de  la  jurisdiction  des  Cahos. 

Du  dix  avril  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  Cinq,  aujourdhuy  est 
comparu  le  S^  Joseph  Labuxiere  tuteur  des  Enfans  mineurs  de 
deffunt  jean  B*^  jacquemain  dit  lajoye  de  la  prairie  du  Rocher 
Lequel  nous  Requis  lenregistrement  cy  apres. 

Je  soussigne  tuteur  des  Enfans  mineurs  de  deffunt  jean  B^® 
jacquemain  dit  lajoye  de  laprairie  du  Rocher  averty  tous  ceux 
qui  ont  pris  des  effets  a  lencan  dud*  deffunt  jacquemain  que  led* 
Encan  dans  le  present  mois  davril  et  que  les  adjudicataires  ayent 
a  payer  eux  ou  leurs  cautions  leurs  adjudications  Entre  les  mains 
de  M^  Barbeau  capitaine  commandant  a  la  prairie  du  Rocher  qui 
leur  donnera  quittance  En  mon  absence  Faute  de  quoy  il  leur  est 
declare  quil  payeront  les  frais  et  depens  que  Ion  fera  pour  aler  ches 
eux  leur  demander  le  recouvrement  Et  en  outre  Linterest  Suivant 
la  Loix  Et  coutume  Etablie  pour  les  mineurs  fait  En  mon  domicile 
des  Cahos  le  9  avril  1785.  signe  Labuxiere  Et  plus  Bas  Est  Ecrit 
Envoye  une  copie  aux  Kas  a  M^  de  Montbrun  et  a  M^  Barbeau 
pour  afficher  chacun  dans  les  Lieux  de  leurs  dependances  le  10 
avril  1785. 

sign^  Labuxiere  tuteur 
fr.  saucier  N.  P. 


(Folio  36.     1786.) 

aujourdhuy  vingt  huit  decembre  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt 
Six  est  comparu  au  greffe  de  ce  siege  le  S'"  gabriel  Baron  habitant 

1  All  pages  between  the  reverse  of  folio  21  and  folio  36  are  omitted.  These  pages  con- 
tain the  copies  of  documents  in  a  suit  between  Laurent  Durocher  of  St.  Louis  and  Pollard  & 
Masson  of  Detroit  in  regard  to  a  consignment  of  goods.     The  men  interested  are  all  from 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  APRIL,  1785  493 

the  two  duties  in  the  same  afifair.  In  faith  of  which  we  have  deliv- 
ered the  present  commission  and  have  signed  and  sealed  it  with 
our  seal  at  Kaskaskia,  the  twelfth  of  December,  1782.  Signed 
on  the  commission,  Richard  Winston,  County  Lieutenant;  which 
commission  we  have  registered  and  returned  the  original  to  the 
said  M.  Labuxiere  that  he  make  use  thereof  and  have  recourse  to 
the  above  registry  in  case  of  need ;  of  which  this  act  will  testify, 
the  said  day  and  year. 

Fr.  Saucier,  Notary. 

Extract  of  the  Registers  of  the  Magistracy  of  Cahokia. 

On  the  tenth  of  April,  1785,  to-day,  there  appeared  M.  Joseph 
Labuxiere,  guardian  of  the  minor  children  of  the  deceased  Jean 
Bte.  Jacquemain  called  Lajoye  of  Prairie  du  Rocher,  who  has 
required  of  us  the  registration  of  what  follows: 

I,  the  undersigned  guardian  of  the  minor  children  of  the  de- 
ceased Jean  Bte.  Jacquemain  called  Lajoye  of  Prairie  du  Rocher, 
notify  all  those  who  have  taken  goods  at  the  auction  of  the  de- 
ceased Jacquemain,  the  said  auction  [having  been  held]  in  the 
present  month  of  April,  that  the  purchasers  have  to  pay  for  them  or 
[give]  their  surety  for  their  purchases  into  the  hands  of  M.  Barbau, 
captain  commandant  at  Prairie  du  Rocher,  who  will  give  them 
receipts  in  my  absence ;  in  default  of  which,  notice  is  given  to  them 
that  they  shall  pay  the  costs  and  charges,  which  are  made  in  going 
to  them  to  demand  the  recovery,  and  also  the  interest  according  to 
the  law  and  established  custom  for  minors.  Made  in  my  domicile 
at  Cahokia  April  9,  1785.  Signed,  Labuxiere.  And  below  is 
written :  Sent  a  copy  to  Kaskaskia  to  M.  de  Monbreun  and  M. 
Barbau  for  each  to  post  in  the  places  of  their  dependencies,  April 
10,  1785. 

Signed  Labuxiere,  guardian. 
Fr.  Saucier,  N.  P. 

(Folio  36,  1786.) 

To-day  the  twenty-eighth  of  December,  1786,  there  appeared 
at  the  office  of  this  Court  M.  Gabriel  Baron  and  Marie  Louise 

St.  Louis  or  Detroit,  and  the  documents  do  not  form  an  integral  part  of  the  Cahokia  records 
The  entries  are  made  by  Joseph  Labuxiere  in  the  years  1786  and  1787. 


494  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

du  poste  des  cahos  et  marie  Louise  Buteau  son  Epouse  porteur 
de  leur  contract  de  mariage  passd  devant  Senet  Notaire  aux 
Cahos  le  vingt  huit  septembre  mil  Sept  cent  Soixante  Seize  Portant 
la  donnation  qui  suit.  Et  pour  se  donner  des  preuves  de  Laffection 
reciproque  quils  Se  portent  Lun  et  lautre  ils  Se  Sont  fait  et  ce  font 
par  ces  presentes  donnation  mutuelle  reciproque  et  a  jamais  irre- 
vocable autant  que  donnation  puisse  valoir  au  dernier  vivant  d'eux 
de  tous  et  uns  Chacuns  les  Biens  meubles  et  immeubles  propres 
acquets  et  conquets  que  le  premier  mourant  aura  et  laissera  au 
jour  et  heure  de  Son  deces  pour  enjouir  par  le  dernier  vivant  En 
plaine  propriete  et  comme  de  chose  luy  apartenante  de  plain  droit, 
cette  presente  donnation  mutuelle  Et  reciproque  ainsy  faite  pourvti 
toutes  fois  quil  ny  ait  point  denfant  nez  ni  a  naitre  dud*  mariage 
car  en  Cas  denfant  ladite  donnation  Sera  nule  de  plain  droit  ainsy 
convenu  Et  accorde.  ce  requerant  les  dits  S^  et  dame  Baron  in- 
sinuation de  la  presente  donnation  nous  lavons  insinuee  et  en- 
registree  sur  le  present  registre  dinsinuation  et  denregistrement 
du  greffe  de  ce  Siege  pour  servir  aud*  s^  dame  Baron  ce  que  de 
raison  dont  acte  lesd*  jour  et  an, 

Labuxiere  N*^^  gfir 

(Page  40,  1787.) 

requisition  de  M^  Joseph  Janez  It  Commi^^  Du  18  Janvier 
1787. 

avis  au  Public 

Le  Soussigne  Etant  charge  de  Prendre  connoissance  des  abus 
de  Nature  publique  qui  ont  ete  commis  ici  a  L'entour  il  est  Bien 
mortiffie  de  voir  que  ces  abus  Sont  Enormes  et  frequants  mais 
comme  la  Nature  de  Sa  Commission  est  telle  qu'il  ne  pent  pas 
pour  le  present  les  Examiner  comme  il  le  voudroit  Et  que  dailleurs 
il  est  plus  glorieux  de  prevenir  les  Crimes  de  peur  qu'on  ne  les 
commete  que  de  les  punir  apres  quils  Sont  commis,  il  avertit  done 
le  public  par  ces  presentes  que  toutes  personnes  ou  personnes 
qui  apres  cette  date  Commetra  ou  occasionnera  quel  que  Ravage, 
ou  pillage  ou  destruction  Soit  au  fort  de  Chartre  ou  a  lEncien 

^  Continuation  of  the  Laurent  Durocher  documents  to  the  reverse  of  folio  39- 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  JANUARY,  1787  495 

Buteau,  his  wife,  bearers  of  their  contract  of  marriage  passed 
before  Senet,  notary  at  Cahokia,  the  twenty-eighth  of  September, 
1773,  containing  the  donation  which  follows:  And  in  order  to  give 
proofs  of  the  reciprocal  affection  which  they  have  one  for  another, 
they  have  made  and  make  by  these  presents  mutual,  reciprocal 
and  irrevocable  donation,  in  so  far  as  a  donation  can  be  valid,  to 
the  survivor  of  them  of  all  and  each  of  the  goods,  personal  and 
real,  inherited  or  acquired  before  or  after  marriage,  which  the 
first  one  dying  shall  have  and  leave  on  the  day  and  hour  of  his  or 
her  decease,  to  be  enjoyed  by  the  survivor  in  full  proprietorship 
and  as  a  thing  belonging  to  him  or  her  in  full  right.  This  present 
mutual  and  reciprocal  donation  is  so  made,  provided,  however, 
that  there  should  be  no  child  born  nor  to  be  born  of  the  said  mar- 
riage; for  in  case  of  a  child  the  said  donation  shall  be  null  in  full 
right  as  agreed  and  granted.  The  said  M.  and  Madame  ^Paron 
requiring  the  registration  of  the  present  donation,  we  have  in- 
scribed and  registered  it  in  the  present  record  of  registrations  of 
the  office  of  this  Court  that  the  said  M.  and  Madame  Baron  may 
make  use  thereof,  of  which  this  act  will  testify,  the  said  day  and 
year.  Labuxiere,  Notary  Clerk. 

(Page  40,  1787-) 

Requisition  of  M.  Joseph  Janez,  Lieut.  Commissary,  January 
i8,  1787. 

Notice  to  the  Public. 

The  undersigned  being  appointed  to  take  cognizance  of  the 
abuses  of  a  public  nature,  which  have  been  committed  here  in  the 
surrounding  places,  he  is  very  mortified  to  see  that  such  abuses 
are  great  and  frequent;  but  as  the  nature  of  his  commission  is 
such  that  he  cannot  examine  them  as  he  would  wish  to,  and  since, 
besides,  it  is  more  glorious  to  prevent  crimes  which  one  fears  will 
be  committed  than  to  punish  them  after  they  are  committed,  he 
warns  the  public,  therefore,  by  these  presents  that  all  persons  or 
person,  who  after  this  date  shall  commit  or  cause  any  depredation, 
robbery  or  destruction  either  at  Fort  de  Chartres  or  at  the  former 
college  of  the  Jesuits  at  Kaskaskia  or  at  the  old  fort  on  the  moun- 


496  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

College  des  jesuites  aux  Caskaskias  ou  a  lEncien  fort  Sur  la  mon- 
tagne  qui  commande  la  ville  ou  a  quelque  magasin  ou  batiment 
publique  ils  peuvent  Satendre  qu'ils  Seront  punis  tres  severement 
puisque  de  la  depend  le  Bonheur  dun  gouvernement  qui  veut  etre 
juste  et  Equitable. 

toutes  personnes  qui  a  en  main  quelque  chose  appar'tenante 
au  public  est  averty  de  le  rendre  au  plustost. 

Le  Soussigne  Sestimeroit  heureux  Si  les  personnes  qu'on  Scait 
avoir  demoli  le  vieux  College  des  jesuites  vouloient  profiter  de 
cet  avis  pour  y  remetre  les  materiaux  quils  en  ont  Emporte  Et 
pour  retablir  les  Batiments  dans  lEtat  ou  ils  Etoient  auparavant, 
dautant  plus  que  dans  peu  il  espere  qu  'on  y  mettra  un  Corp  de 
troupes  En  garnison  lequel  aura  Besoin  de  ces  Batiments  Et  fera 
les  Enquetes  necessaires  concernants  les  dites  personnes  Si  elles 
negligent  cette  precaution,  signe  Joseph  janes  Lt.  com^^  aux 
Kaskakakias  [sic]  le  ii  Janvier  1787. 

Lu  public  et  affiche  a  la  porte  de  L  Eglise  des  cahos  par  moy 
Joseph  Labuxiere  N^®  et  greffier  aud*  lieu  le  18  Janvier  1787. 

Labuxiere  grefier. 

Du  19  fevrier  1787 
Est  comparu  le  S^  augustin  dubuc  marchand  voyageur  Etant 
de  present  aux  Cahos  a  Lissue  de  la  Cour  de  justice  Seante  En 

(41,  1787.) 
la  Chambre  du  greffe  Lequel  apres  avoir  presente  a  la  dite  cour 
la  requete  cy  apres  en  a  requis  lenregistrement  En  ce  dit  greffe 
que  jay  transcrit  Sur  le  registre  des  Enregistrement  mot  a  mot 
suivant  loriginal  ainsy  quil  Suit. 

a  Monsieur  jean  B*^  LaCroix  presidant  Et  Messieurs  Les 
juges  de  la  cour  du  district  des  cahos 
Messieurs 

augustin  dubuque  marchand  voyageur  de  montreal  residant 
a  present  en  ce  poste  faisant  par  procuration  du  S^  valentine 
jautard  avocat  En  la  dite  ville  a  Ihonneur  de  vous  representer 

1  Janis  was  appointed  commissioner  either  by  the  government  of  the  revived  French  party 
after  the  receipt  of  a  letter  from  Congress  or  else  by  George  Rogers  Clark,  who  was  at  this 
time  in  Vincennes.  The  notice  is  evidently  directed  against  John  Dodge,  who  had  possession 
of  the  old  fort  on  the  bluffs  and  who  had  taken  cannon  and  other  material  ifor  fortification  from 
the  Jesuit  building  in  the  village,  known  as  Fort  Clark.     See  Introdtiction,  p.  cxxviii. 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1787  497 

tain  which  commands  the  village  or  at  any  storehouse  or  public 
building,  they  may  expect  that  they  will  be  punished  very  severely, 
since  therefrom  depends  tbe  welfare  of  a  government  which  de- 
sires to  be  just  and  equitable. 

Every  person  who  has  in  his  possession  anything  belonging  to 
the  public  is  notified  to  return  it  as  soon  as  possible. 

The  undersigned  would  think  himself  fortunate,  if  the  persons 
who  are  known  to  have  demolished  the  old  college  of  the  Jesuits 
would  profit  by  this  notice  to  bring  to  it  the  materials  which  they 
have  taken  therefrom  and  to  rebuild  the  structures  in  the  condition 
in  which  they  were  hitherto,  since  it  is  hoped  that  in  a  short  time 
there  will  be  stationed  there  in  garrison  a  corps  of  troops,  who  will 
have  need  of  these  buildings;  and  the  necessary  enquiries  con- 
cerning these  persons  will  be  made,  if  they  neglect  this  warning. 
Signed  at  Kaskaskia,  January  11,  1787,  Joseph  Janez,  Lieut  Com. 

Read,  published  and  posted  on  the  door  of  the  church  of 
Cahokia  by  me,  Joseph  Labuxiere,  notary  and  clerk  of  the  said 
place  January  18,  1787.^ 

Labuxiere,  Clerk. 

February  19,  1787. 

There  appeared  M.  Augustin  Dubuque,  traveling  trader,  at 
present  in  Cahokia,  at  the  door  of  the  court  of  justice  sitting  in 
the  office  of  the  clerk;  and  after  having  presented  to  the  said 
Court  the  following  petition,  he  has  required  the  registration  there- 
of in  this  said  office ;  and  I  have  transcribed  it  on  the  record  of  the 
registrations  word  for  word  according  to  the  original  as  follows : 

To  M.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix  and  MM.  the  Judges  of  the  Court  of 
the  District  of  Cahokia. 

Sirs: 

Augustin  Dubuque,  traveling  trader  of  Montreal,  resident  at 
present  in  this  post,  and  acting  by  powef  of  attorney  of  M.  Valen- 
tine Jautard,  lawyer  in  the  said  city,  has  the  honor  to  show  you 
that,  in  virtue  of  the  decree  under  date  of  the  sixth  of  the  month 
of  November  last,  of  which  it  has  pleased  you  to  cause  him  to  be 
informed,  he  had  believed  that  [he  would  have  received  justice] 
in  accordance  with  the  legality  of  the  claims  which  the  said  M. 


498  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

quen  vertu  de  la  Sentence  quil  vous  a  pl<i  luy  faire  Signiffier  en 
date  du  Sixieme  du  mois  de  Novembre  dernier  il  auroit  Crii  qua- 
pr^s  la  validite  des  droits  que  a  requis  led*  s^  jautard  Sur  les  Biens 
Cy  devant  appartenants  aux  missions  Etrangeres  Situes  En  ce 
village  paroisse  de  la  S*®  famille  consistant  En  une  maison  de 
pierre  et  Son  terrain  ainsy  quune  terre  Et  autres  effets  tel  quil 
est  Ennonce  par  le  contract  de  vente  quen  a  fait  en  Son  vivant 
le  S^  jean  Lagrange  au  S^  jautard  par  acte  passe  pardevant  m^ 
Labuxiere  Notaire  Royal  en  datte  du  quatriesme  juin  de  Lannee 
mil  Sept  cent  Soixante  Cinq  dont  led*  S'"  Lagrange  avoit  acquis 
le  tout  de  M^  francois  forget  duverger  pretre  et  missionnaire  des 
missions  Etrangeres  grand  vicaire  de  M^  Leveque  de  quebec 
faisant  et  agissant  alors  au  Nom  de  M^  Le  Superieur  des  missions 
Etrangere  de  paris,  par  acte  passe  devant  led*  M^  Labuxiere  notaire 
Royal  des  [lUinoisJle  Cinquiesme  de  Novembre  mil  sept  cent  Soixante 
trois  Sous  le  gouvernement  de  M^  de  Neyon  alors  gouverneur  de 
ce  pays  au  Service  de  Sa  majeste  le  Roy  de  france.  Le  supliant 
ne  pent  cacher  Sa  Surprise  connoissant  la  probity  des  arbitres 
Nommes  par  la  communaute  des  habitans  de  ce  village  pour 
donner  leurs  opinions  Sur  la  validite  ou  linvalidite  des  titres  cy 
dessus  mentionn^s,  de  voir  avec  quelle  authority  (et  Sil  m'est 
permis  Sans  blesser  la  modestie  des  dits  arbitres)  avec  quelle 
legerite  ils  ont  Casse  Ennuis  et  mis  au  Neant  les  actes  passes  il 
y  a  vingt  Cinq  a  vingt  six  ans  par  main  de  Notaire  Royal,  tems 
ou  le  pays  Etoit  sous  la  domination  francaise  et  jouissoit  dune 
justice  Etablie  Et  reglee  Et  ou  toutes  personnes  en  place  N  'auroit 
Eu  la  temerite  de  passer  ou  recevoir  aucun  acte  qui  ne  fut  con- 
forme  aux  loix  Sans  Encourir  les  risques  de  punition. 

quil  me  soit  permis  Messieurs  de  vous  observer  quel  seroit  Ce 
droit  des  gens  Si  la  Cour  daujourdhuy  toute  respectable  quelle 
est,  Et  quel  pouvoir  qui  luy  soit  Confie,  avoit  le  droit  de  Casser 

(42,  1787.) 
les  actes  passez  sous  les  gouvernements  francais  et  anglais  Sous 
lesquels  nous  avons  Successivement  passez  dans  lespace  dEnviron 
quatorze  a  quinze  ans,  quelle  seroit  la  Surete  publique,  y  auroit-il 

1  For  an  account  of  the  purchase  by  Jautard,  see  Thwaites,  Jesuit  Relations,  had.,  37. 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1787  499 

Jautard  has  made  to  the  property  heretofore  belonging  to  the 
foreign  missions  situated  in  this  village,  parish  of  the  Holy  Family, 
and  consisting  of  a  stone  house  with  its  lot  as  well  as  a  plantation 
and  other  effects,  such  as  is  described  by  the  contract  of  sale, 
which  M.  Jean  Lagrange  during  his  life  made  thereof  to  M. 
Jautard  by  instrument  passed  before  M.  Labuxiere,  royal  notary, 
dated  June  4,  1765,  all  of  which  the  said  M.  Lagrange  had  ac- 
quired from  M.  Francois  Forget  Duverger,  priest  and  mission- 
ary of  the  foreign  missions  and  grand  vicar  of  the  bishop  of 
Quebec,  acting  at  that  time  in  the  name  of  M.  the  Superior  of 
the  foreign  missions  of  Paris,  by  instrument  passed  before  the 
said  M.  Labuxiere,  royal  notary  of  the  [Illinois],  on  the  5th 
of  November,  1763,  under  the  government  of  M.  de  Neyon,  at  the 
time  governor  of  this  country  in  the  service  of  His  Majesty  the 
King  of  France.^  The  petitioner  cannot  conceal  his  surprise,  since 
he  knows  the  probity  of  the  arbitrators  appointed  by  the  community 
of  the  inhabitants  of  this  village  to  give  their  votes  on  the  validity  or 
invalidity  of  the  titles  hereinabove  mentioned,  at  seeing  with  what 
authority  (and  if  it  is  permitted  without  wounding  the  modesty 
of  the  said  arbitrators)  with  what  levity  they  have  put  aside,  an- 
nulled and  set  at  naught  the  instruments  passed  twenty-five  to 
twenty-six  years  ago  by  the  hand  of  a  royal  notary,  at  which  time 
the  country  was  under  the  French  dominion  and  enjoyed  an  estab- 
lished and  regulated  justice  and  when  no  person  in  office  would 
have  had  the  temerity  to  pass  or  receive  any  instrument,  which  did 
not  conform  to  the  laws,  without  incurring  the  risks  of  punishment. 
Permit  me,  gentlemen,  to  inform  you  what  this  right  of  the 
people  would  be,  if  the  Court  of  to-day,  wholly  honorable  as  it  is, 
and  what  the  power  which  is  confided  to  you  would  be,  did  the 
right  exist  of  setting  aside  the  instruments  passed  under  the  French 
and  English  governments,  under  which  we  have  successively 
passed  in  the  space  of  about  fourteen  to  fifteen  years.  What  would 
be  the  public  surety  ?  Would  there  be  any  individual  who  could 
flatter  himself  with  enjoying  acquisitions  which  he  has  made  or  will 
leave  to  his  descendants,  without  running  the  risk  of  seeing  them 
forfeited  ?    Would  not  such  a  power  become  absurd  which  instead 


500  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

aucun  particulier  qui  pti  se  flater  de  jouir  des  acquisitions  quil  a 
faites  ou  laissdes  a  leurs  descendans  Sans  courir  les  risques  de 
S'En  voir  dechu,  un  tel  pouvoir  ne  deviendroit-il  pas  absurde  qui 
au  lieu  de  veiller  a  la  Surete  publique  par  le  maintien  des  loix 
donneroit  atteinte  a  les  Enffeindre,  le  droit  des  gens  Est  un  droit 
que  toutes  nations  Civilizees  respectent  Et  Se  rendent  reciproque- 
ment  les  uns  aux  autres,  lorsque  le  pays  fut  rendu  par  le  traits 
de  paix  aux  Englais  Ion  a  vu  cette  nation  respecter  Et  metre  En 
force  tout  acte  de  justice  passez  Sous  le  gouvernement  francais, 
comme  maintenant  que  nous  Sommes  au  pouvoir  des  Etats  unis 
de  Lamerique  Ion  verra  cette  puissance  maintenir  dans  toute 
Sa  force  toutes  loix  et  usages  existants  Sous  les  deux  gouverne- 
ments  anterieurs  les  puissances  Conquerantes  ont  le  droit  dajouter 
au  pays  qu'ils  ont  conquis  les  loix  qui  leurs  Sont  propres  mais^ 
non  pas  de  Casser  celles  qui  regnoient  precedament 

Le  Supliant  vous  represente  tres  respectueusement  quen  vertu 
de  la  procuration  a  lui  livree  par  le  S^  valentin  jautrad  avocat 
resident  a  montreal  pour  Se  nantir  des  Biens  cy  devant  mentionnez 
quil  avoit  legitimement  acquis  de  deffunt  S^  jean  Lagrange  Et 
dont  il  a  joui  paisiblement  pendant  lespace  denviron  vingt  un  an 
Sans  interuptions  ni  apellation  de  qui  que  ce  soit  il  a  En  conce- 
quance  Lannee  derniere  fait  DeCretter  La  dite  Mission  avec 
les  Dits  Biens  En  presence  de  temoin,  pendant  trois  Mois  de 
Suitte  a  la  porte  de  L'eglise  au  nom  du  dit  Sieur  Valentine  Jau- 
tard  Comme  a  lui  appartenant  Sans  que  qui  que  Ce  Soit  Se  pr^- 
sentat  pour  ym'ettre  Empechment,  et  ont  ete  vandu  Juridicque- 
ment  Selon  les  Loix  et  Coutumes  du  pais  a  la  porte  de  L  'eglise, 
La  quel  vente  Le  Suppliant  Entend  quil  est  Lieu  Sauf  au  Colege 
des  Mission  Etrangeres  d 'avoir  Leurs  recours  Contre  Leurs  agent; 
Le  Suppliant  a  L'honneur  de  vous  observer  Messieurs  que  Lorsque 
il  a  donne  Sa  Signature  pour  Se  Soumettre  a  la  Desition  des  Arbi- 
tres  il  ne  Croyoit  pas  avoir  affaire  a  ses  propres  parties  puisse  qu'il 
ce  Disent  ou  ils  sont  Connu  Etre  de  la  Communaute  des  habitans 
II  ne  veut  pas  dire  par  la  qu'il  est  Cru  m'al  Decider  mais  il  san- 
tient  deCement  que  faisant  corps  Dans  le  nombre  des  paroissiens 
ils  aurait  Du  Ce  Recuser  au  lieu  de  prendre  Le  ton  dautorit^  de 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1787       501 

of  watching  over  the  public  surety  through  the  maintenance  of  the 
laws  should  give  a  blow  to  break  them.  The  right  of  the  people 
is  a  right  which  all  civilized  nations  respect  and  submit  to  recip- 
rocally. When  the  country  was  surrendered  to  the  English  by  the 
treaty  of  peace,  that  nation  was  seen  to  respect  and  put  in  force  all 
acts  of  justice  passed  under  the  French  government.  Since  now 
we  are  in  the  power  of  the  United  States,  it  will  be  seen  that  this 
power  maintains  in  all  their  force  the  laws  and  usages  which  have 
existed  under  the  two  preceding  governments.  The  conquering 
powers  have  the  right  to  add  to  the  country,  which  they  have  con- 
quered, the  laws  which  are  their  own ;  but  not  to  annul  those  which 
were  in  force  before. 

The  petitioner  sets  forth  to  you  very  respectfully  that,  in  virtue 
of  the  power  of  attorney  given  him  by  M.  Valentine  Jautard, 
lawyer  residing  in  Montreal,  to  take  possession  of  the  property 
hereinbefore  mentioned,  which  he  had  legitimately  acquired  from 
the  deceased  M.  Jean  Lagrange  and  which  he  has  enjoyed  peace- 
fully during  the  space  of  about  twenty- one  years  without  interrup- 
tion or  action  from  any  one,  and  in  consequence  thereof,  he  last  year 
caused  to  be  issued  in  the  presence  of  witnesses  and  posted,  for 
three  months  together  at  the  door  of  the  church,  a  writ  against  the 
said  mission  and  its  property  in  the  name  of  the  said  M.  Valentine 
Jautard  as  belonging  to  him,  without  any  one  presenting  himself 
to  make  objection  thereto ;  and  judicial  sale  was  made  according 
to  the  laws  and  customs  of  the  country  at  the  door  of  the  church 
which  sale,  the  petitioner  understands,  is  allowed,  reserving  to  the 
college  of  the  foreign  missions  the  right  to  have  recourse  against 
their  agent.  The  petitioner  has  the  honor  to  remark  to  you,  gen- 
tlemen, that  when  he  gave  his  signature  to  submit  himself  to  the 
decision  of  the  arbitrators,  he  did  not  believe  that  he  had  an  affair 
with  the  interested  parties.  Since  they  say  it  or  are  known  to  be 
of  the  community  of  the  inhabitants,  and  he  does  not  wish  to  say  by 
that  it  is  believed  the  decision  was  unjust,  but  he  feels  that,  since 
they  were  of  the  number  of  the  parishioners,  they  ought  properly 
to  have  challenged  them  instead  of  taking  the  tone  of  authority  to 
annul  and  set  aside  authentic  instruments  legally  passed  under  a 


502  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

(43,  1787.) 

Casser  et  d'an^anter  des  actes  authentiques  passer  L'egalement 
Sous  un  Governement  sage;  Le  Suppliant  ne  peut  voir  quavec Peine 
que  Les  susdits  arbitres  annonCent  dans  un  passage  de  Leurs  Sen- 
tance  que  Le  dit  Suppliant  est  Nantie  De  titres  authentiques  de  la 
part  du  S'"  Jautard  et  dans  un  autre  ils  disent  quils  N'en  a  pas 
sufEisamant  puisquil  En  demande  d'autres  ils  osent  Encore  avan- 
cer  que  Le  S'"  abbe  forget  s  'est  Evade  furtivement  de  pais  dans  le 
tems  quils  scavent  Le  Contraire,  Leurs  sentence  prouve  que 
L  'abbe  forget  a  Emport^r  Les  fonds  de  la  Mission  En  f ranee,  C  'est 
done  La  Mission  meme  qui  a  operer  dans  Ce  fait,  puis  qu'ils  avoit 
Mis  La  Gestion  et  La  Conduite  Entre  les  mains  du  dit  forget  et  que 
personne  ne  Ce  soit  opposer  a  la  sortie  des  fonds  L'orsqu'il  partie 
du  pais;  dans  Le  Convoy  de  Monsieur  de  Neyon  alors  Gouverneur 
du  pais;  Le  Suppliant  Doit  done  Etre  Certain  que  Le  dit  forget 
avoit  tous  pouvoir  dans  Ladministration  de  cette  Mission  et  Les 
habitans  n'en  ont  point  Douter  puisquils  ont  acquis  de  Lui,  et 
quand  meme  il  N'auroit  pas  Ete  muny  d'un  pouvoir  particulier, 
il  a  Ete  Connu  membre  de  La  Mission  et  Vicaire  general  et  par 
consequant  toutes  Les  ventes  ou  transsactions  faites  par  lui  sont 
pour  le  Compte  de  la  dite  mission,  il  est  done  plus  que  Ridicule 
aux  arbitres  de  prendre  Le  haut  ton  d  'autorite  de  Casser  et  annul- 
ler  des  actes  Sacres,  un  tribunal  de  Justice  Legale  Les  respecte 
partous,  il  ny  a  que  Le  deffaut  de  forme  qui  puisse  Les  anneantir, 
mais  il  est  defliendu  a  des  arbitres  Den  Connoitre.  Ce  Consider^ 
il  vous  Plaise,  Messieurs  Declarer  La  dite  sentence  null  et  Randu 
par  des  Personnes  inCompetentes,  dire  que  Leur  pouvoir  ne 
s'etand  pas  Jusqu'a  decider  une  affaire  de  Droits  qui  n'appar- 
tient  qu'au  tribunal  Competent,  de  plus  le  suppliant  vous  prie. 
Messieurs,  de  le  recevoir  appelant  de  La  susdite  sentence  et  de  Lui 
En  Expedier  acte  afin  qu'il  puisse  se  pourvoir  partout  ou  a  qui 
le  droits  appartiendra,  et  ferez  droit.  Presente  par  moi  soussign^ 
a  la  cour  respective  des  Cahokias  le  15  ®°'''  fevrier  1787  au  Kaho- 
kias.  sign^  dubuc  Et  a  linstant  ladite  requete  a  Et^  Remise  aud* 
s'"  dubuque  par  moy  greffier  Soussigne  apres  la  seance  de  la  Cour 
tenue  par  M""^  fr.  Saucier  presidant  au  lieu  et  place  de  s^  jean  B*« 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  FEBRUARY,  1787  503 

well-conducted  government.  The  petitioner  can  see  only  with 
puin  that  the  arbitrators  aforesaid  announce  in  a  passage  of  their 
verdict  that  the  said  petitioner  is  provided  with  authentic  titles 
from  M.  Jautard  and  in  another  they  say  that  he  has  not  sufficient 
of  them,  since  they  demand  others.  They  also  dare  to  advance 
that  M.  Abbe  Forget  left  the  country  at  the  time  secretly,  when 
they  know  the  contrary.  Their  verdict  proves  that  the  Abb^ 
Forget  has  carried  the  funds  of  the  mission  to  France.  It  is  then 
the  mission  itself  which  has  acted  in  this  deed,  since  they  have 
placed  the  action  and  conduct  in  the  hands  of  the  said  Forget  and 
since  no  one  has  made  opposition  to  the  departure  of  the  funds, 
when  he  set  out  from  the  country  in  the  convoy  of  M.  de  Neyon, 
at  that  time  governor  of  the  country.  The  petitioner  ought  then 
to  be  certain  that  the  said  Forget  had  all  power  in  the  administra- 
tion of  this  mission ;  and  the  inhabitants  have  had  no  doubt  there- 
of, since  they  have  acquired  property  of  him ;  and  if  even  he  should 
not  have  been  armed  with  a  particular  power,  he  has  been  known 
as  a  member  of  the  mission  and  vicar- general  and  consequently 
all  the  sales  or  transactions  made  by  him  are  for  the  account  of  the 
said  mission;  and  it  is  therefore  more  than  ridiculous  for  arbitra- 
tors to  take  the  high  tone  of  authority  of  annulling  and  setting  aside 
sacred  acts  —  a  tribunal  of  civil  justice  would  respect  them  every- 
where. There  is  only  the  defect  of  form  which  could  annul  them, 
but  it  is  forbidden  arbitrators  to  take  cognizance  thereof.  In  con- 
sideration of  this,  gentlemen,  you  should  decide  to  declare  the  said 
verdict  null  and  rendered  by  persons  incompetent,  and  to  say  that 
their  power  does  not  extend  to  deciding  a  question  of  law,  which 
belongs  only  to  a  competent  tribunal. 

Furthermore  the  petitioner  prays  you,  gentlemen,  to  receive 
his  appeal  from  the  verdict  aforesaid  and  to  expedite  an  act  thereof 
in  order  that  he  can  plead  everywhere  in  regard  to  whom  the 
rights  belong  and  obtain  justice.  Presented  by  me,  the  under- 
signed, to  the  honorable  Court  of  Cahokia,  the  15th  of  February, 
1787,  at  Cahokia.  Signed,  Dubuque.  And  now  the  said  petition 
has  been  returned  to  the  said  M.  Dubuque  by  me  the  undersigned 
clerk,  after  the  sitting  of  the  Court,  held  by  MM.  Fr.  Saucier,  presi- 


504  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

(44,  1787.) 
LaCroix — At.  girardin  —  Louis  Chatel  —  M  saucier  —  Clement  • 
alary — et  Joseph  Lapens^e  a  qui  ladite  Requete  a  Et^  presentee  Et 
par  eux  apointee  au  bas  dicelle  ainsy  quil  suit  yH  par  la  Cour 
assemblee  la  requete  cy  dessus  du  s^  dubuque  Ensemble  la  sentence 
rendue  par  les  deputez  arbitres  Nommez^par  la  Communaute  des 
habitans  des  cahos  auxquels  led*  s''  dubuq  a  promis  de  sen 
raporter  par  son  Ecrit  En  datte  du  sept  Novembre  1786.  la  Cour 
a  deboute  le  s^  dubuque  de  toutes  ses  demandes  et  chef  dobserva- 
tions  mentionnes  En  sa  requete  Et  a  Confirme  et  Confirme  la 
sentence  desdits  deputez  et  ordonne  quelle  sortira  son  plain  Et 
EntierEffet  nonobstant  tout  apel.  donne  aux  Cahos  le  19  fevrier 
mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt  sept,  signe  au  bas  de  Lapointe  de 
ladite  requete  remise  au  s^  dubuque  At  girardin — M*  saucier — une 
+pour  marque  de  Joseph  Lapens^e — une + pour  marque  de  Cle- 
ment alary,  une + pour  marque  de  Louis  Chatel — F.  Saucier 
presidant  et  le  grefier  soussigne 

Aug.  Dubuq  Labuxiere 

aujourdhuy  premier  Mars  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  Sept  est 
comparti  au  greffe  de  ce  siege  le  s^  augustin  dubuque  marchand 
voyageur  lequel  a  requis  Lenregistrement  de  la  procuration  cy 
apres 

Pardevant  les  notaires  de  la  province  de  quebec  residants  a 
montreal  Soussignez  M^  valentin  jautard  avocat  demeurant  fau- 
bourg S*  Joseph  pres  cette  ville  de  montreal  lequel  a  par  ces  pre- 
sentes  fait  et  constitue  Son  procureur  general  et  special  la  pesonne 
de  M^  augustin  Dubuc  Negociant  voyageur  actuellement  En  cette 
ville  auquel  il  donne  pouvoir  de  pour  luy  et  En  Son  Nom  aliener 
vendre,  cedder,  et  transporter  a  qui  Bon  luy  Semblera  Et  pour 
tel  prix  et  Sommes  que  led*  S^  Contsitue  jugera  les  terrains  cy 
apres  dessignez  Savoir,  un  lopin  de  terre  Situe  au  village  des 
cahokias  paroisse  de  la  S*^  famille  contenant  Environ  trois  cent 
pieds  de  terre  de  front,  Sur  neuf  cent  pieds  de  profundeur  Sur 
lequel  Est  construite  une  maison  de  pierre  ainsy  et  dans  lEtat  ou 
elle  Se  trouve  actuellement,  plus  une  terre  de  quatre  arpents  de 
front  situe  anteritoire  des  cahos  a  prendre  du  Rigolet  en  pro- 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  MARCH,  1787  505 

dent  in  the  place  and  stead  of  M.  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  Ant.  Girardin, 
Louis  Chatel,  M.  Saucier,  Clement  Alarie,  and  Joseph  Lapance, 
to  whom  the  said  petition  was  presented  and  by  them  referred. 
Below  is  also  what  follows:  Seen  by  the  assembled  Court  the 
above  petition  of  M.  Dubuque,  together  with  the  verdict  of  the 
deputed  arbitrators  appointed  by  the  community  of  the  inhabitants 
of  Cahokia,  to  whom  the  said  M.  Dubuque  has  promised  to  leave 
the  decision  by  his  writing  dated  November  7,  1786.  The  Court 
has  overruled  all  the  prayers  and  principal  observations  mentioned 
in  the  petition  of  M.  Dubuque,  and  has  confirmed  and  does  con- 
firm the  verdict  of  the  said  deputies,  and  decrees  that  it  shall  have 
its  full  and  entire  effect  notwithstanding  all  appeal.  Given  at 
Cahokia  February  19,  1787.  Signed  below  the  reference  of  the 
said  petition  returned  to  M.  Dubuque,  Ant.  Girardin,  Mt.  Saucier, 
a  +  for  the  mark  of  Joseph  Lapance,  a+  for  the  mark  of  Clement 
Alary,  a  +  for  the  mark  of  Louis  Chatel,  Fr.  Saucier,  president, 
and  the  undersigned  clerk. 

Aug.  Dubuque.  Labuxiere. 

To-day,  the  first  of  March,  1787,  there  appeared  at  the  office 
of  this  Court  M.  Augustin  Dubuque,  traveling  trader,  who  has 
required  the  registration  of  the  power  of  attorney  here  following : 

"Before  the  undersigned  notaries  of  the  province  of  Quebec, 
residing  at  Montreal,  M.  Valentine  Jautard,  lawyer  living  in  the 
faubourg  St.  Joseph  near  this  city  of  Montreal,  has  by  these 
presents  made  and  constituted  his  attorney,  general  and  special, 
the  person  of  M.  Augustin  Dubuque,  traveling  merchant,  at  pres- 
ent in  this  city,  to  whom  he  has  given  power  to  sell,  alienate,  cede 
and  transfer  for  him  and  in  his  name,  to  whom  it  shall  seem  good 
to  him  and  for  what  price  and  sum  which  the  said  constituted 
attorney  shall  determine,  the  lands  hereafter  designated:  to  wit, 
a  piece  of  land  situated  in  the  village  of  Cahokia,  parish  of  the 
Holy  Family,  containing  about  three  hundred  feet  frontage  and 
about  nine  hundred  feet  in  depth,  upon  which  is  constructed  a 
stone  house,  in  whatever  condition  it  is  found  at  present;  also  a 
plantation  of  four  arpents  frontage  situated  in  front  of  Cahokia 
extending  in  depth  from  the  trench  to  the  bluffs,  adjoining  on 


5o6  ILLINOIS  mSTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

(45.  1787.) 

fondeur  jusques  aux  cotes,  joignant  dun  cost6  au  S^  Clermont  Et 
de  lautre  cost^  au  Nomme  dorion  Suivant  les  designations 
Portees  aux  contracts  dacquisitions  que  led*  S^  Constituant  en  a 
faite  de  feu  S''  jean  lagrange  vivant  Negociant  aux  caskakias  par 
contract  passe  devant  M^  Labuxiere  Notaire  en  datte  du  quatre 
juin  mil  Sept  cent  Soixante  Cinq  dont  led*  S^  lagrange  avoit  acquis 
le  tout  de  M'"^  francois  forget  duverger  pretre  et  missionaire  des 
missions  Etrangeres  grand  vicaire  de  M^  Leveque  de  quebec  faisant 
et  agissant  alors  au  Nom  de  M^  le  Superieur  des  missions  Etrangeres 
de  paris  par  acte  passe  devant  led*  M^  Labuxiere  des  [Illinois] 
le  Cinq  Novembre  mil  Sept  cent  Soixante  trois,  dont  tous  les  dits 
titres  y  Enonces  ont  et6  remis  aud*  S^  Constitue  pour  et  en  vertu 
diceux  en  prendre  pocession  au  Nom  dud*  S^constituant,  les  vendre 
comme  dit  est  au  meilleur  avantage  que  led*  constitue  trouvera 
Enfin  plaider  apeller,  obtenir  jugements  aux  fins  de  deguerpisse- 
ments  Si  personne  ou  personnes  quelconques  Setoient  a  propria 
les  dits  Biens,  En  un  mot  passer  tous  toutres  [sic]  de  vente  revetir 
lacquereur  ou  les  acquereurs  de  toute  propriete  au  Nom  dud* 
Constituant  Et  du  produit  des  ventes  En  recevoir  iceux  deniers 
et  den  donner  quittances  ou  en  passer  tous  actes  au  profit  des 
acquereurs,  prometant  led*  S^  constituant  avoir  tout  pour  agre- 
able  ce  que  led*  S^  Constitud  fera,  donnant  pouvoir  de  constituer 
un  ou  plusieurs  procureurs  Sans  Besoin  de  ratification  de  la  part 
dud*  S^  constituant  voulant  que  la  presente  vaille  jusqua  revoca- 
tion expresse  tel  laps  de  tems  qui  puisse  Se  couler,  car  ainsi  prome- 
tant &c.  obligeant  &c  voulant  &c  nonobstant  &c.  fait  et  passe 
a  montreal  Etude  des  Soussignez  Ian  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt 
Cinq  le  dix  neuf  May  avant  midy,  ces  presentes  delivrees  En  Bre- 
vet, et  a  mond*  S^  constituant  Signe  ces  presentes  avec  les  Notaires 
Lecture  faite  Suivant  Lordonnance — signe  v  jautard — Foucher — fr. 
LeGuay  Notaires.  et  plus  basest  Escrit  Nous  Rene  ovide  hertel 
Ecuyer  Seigneur  de  Rouville  L'un  des  juges  de  Sa  Majeste  En 
Sa  Cour  des  playdoyers  Communs,  district  de  Montreal  province 
de  quebec  &c.  &c.  Certiffions  a  tous  quil  appartiendra  que  M^^ 
fr.  LeGuay  et  antoine  foucher  qui  ont  Signe  et  delivre  ces  presentes 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  MARCH,  1787  507 

one  side  M.  Clermont's  and  on  the  other  the  land  of  the  named 
Dorion  according  to  the  description  contained  in  the  contracts 
of  acquisition,  which  the  said  constituter  made  therefor  with  the 
late  M.  Jean  Lagrange,  during  his  life  merchant  at  Kaskaskia, 
by  contract  passed  before  M.  Labuxiere,  notary,  under  date  of 
June  4, 1765,  all  of  which  the  said  M.  Lagrange  had  acquired  from 
M.  Francois  Forget  Duverger,  priest  and  missionary  of  the 
foreign  missions  and  grand  vicar  of  the  Bishop  of  Quebec,  acting 
at  that  time  in  the  name  of  M.  the  Superior  of  the  foreign  missions 
of  Paris,  by  act  passed  before  the  said  M.  Labuxiere,  royal  notary 
of  the  [Illinois]  on  November  5,  1763.  All  the  said  title  deeds  here 
mentioned  have  been  delivered  to  the  constituted  attorney  that  he 
may  by  virtue  thereof  take  possession  in  the  name  of  the  said  con 
stituter,  and  sell  them,  as  said,  to  the  best  advantage,  that  the  said 
constituted  attorney  shall  find ;  finally  that  he  may  plead,  appeal  and 
obtain  judgments  for  the  purpose  of  ejectments,  if  any  person  or 
persons,  whatever,  has  appropriated  the  said  property,  in  a  word  to 
make  all  contracts  of  sale  and  to  invest  the  purchaser  or  purchasers 
with  full  property  rights  in  the  name  of  the  said  constituter  and  to 
receive  the  money  from  the  product  of  the  sales  and  to  give  receipts 
therefor  or  to  pass  all  acts  to  the  profit  of  the  purchasers ;  the  said 
constituter  promises  to  sanction  all  which  the  said  constituted  attor- 
ney shall  do ;  and  gives  him  power  to  constitute  one  or  more  attorneys 
without  the  need  of  ratification  on  the  part  of  the  said  constituter; 
and  he  wishes  that  the  present  be  valid  until  express  revocation 
without  regard  to  the  time  which  may  elapse ;  for  thus  promising 
etc.  binding,  etc.  willing,  etc.  notwithstanding  etc.  Made  and 
passed  at  Montreal  in  the  office  of  the  undersigned,  the  year  1785, 
{he  nineteenth  of  May  before  noon.  These  presents  were  delivered 
in  brevet  and  the  said  M.  constituter  signed  these  presents  with 
the  notaries,  after  reading  was  made  according  to  the  ordinance. 
Signed,  V.  Jautard,  Foucher,  Fr.  Le  Guay,  notaries.  And 
below  is  written  —  We,  Rene  Ovide  Hertel  Esquire,  Seigneur  de 
Rouville,  one  of  judges  of  His  Majesty  in  his  Court  of  Common 
Pleas,  district  of  Montreal,  province  of  Quebec  etc.  etc.  certify  to 
all  whom  it  may  concern  that  MM.  Le  Guay  and  Antoine  Foucher, 


So8  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

(46,  1787.) 
Sont  notaires  En  cette  province  que  foy  doit  etre  ajout^e  aux 
actes  quils  passent  tant  en  jugements  que  hors  Certifions  En  outre 
que  le  papier  timbre  nest  point  En  usage  dans  cette  dite  province 
En  foy  de  quoy  nous  avons  signe  ces  presentes  et  a  icelles  apose 
le  seau  de  nos  armes  ordinaires  donne  a  Montreal  En  notre  hotel 
le  19  May  1785  signe  hertel  de  Rouville 

Et  plus  Bas  est  Ecrit.  je  Soussigne  augustin  dubuque  je  trans- 
porte  la  presente  procuration  a  M^  jean  dumoulin  Negociant 
pour  lexercer  Et  la  faire  valoir  En  tons  son  contenu,  de  meme  et 
ainsy  que  jaurois  pla  faire  le  metant  et  transmetant  En  mon  lieu 
Et  place  aux  Cahos  le  dix  sept  Novembre  mil  sept  cent  quatre 
vingt  Cinq,  signe  A.  Dubuc. 

Et  a  linstant  ladite  procuration  a  Ete  delivree  par  moy  gref- 
fier  soussigne  aud*  s^  augustin  Dubuc  lesd*  jour  Et  an. 

Aug,  Dubuque  Labuxiere 

aujourdhuy  vingt  quatre  avril  mil  sept  Cent  quatre  vingt  Sept 
est  comparu  au  greffe  de  la  jurisdiction  des  Cahos  aux  ilinois  M'" 
huges  huvard  porteur  des  pieces  Suivantes  lequel  En  a  requis 
Lenregistrement  Suivant  Et  transcrit  sur  le  present  registres  lui 
meme  atendu  que  le  grefi&er  nentend  pas  la  langue  anglaise  ainsy 
quil  Suit 

Know  all  men  by  these  presents  that  I  John  Askin  of  Detroit 
Merchant  have  made  ordain'd  Constituted  &  appointed  &  by  these 
presents  do  make  ordain  constitute  &  appoint  in  my  place  & 
stead  put  &  depute  M'"  Hugh  Heward  of  Detroit  aforesaid  my 
true  &  lawful  attorney  for  me  &  in  my  Name  &  for  my  Use  to 
ask  Demand  recover  &  receive  of  &  from  any  person  or  persons 
indebted  to  me  or  any  of  my  former  Copartnerships. —  giving  & 
granting  to  my  said  attorney  my  sole  &  full  power  &  authority  to 
take  pursue  &  follow  such  legal  Courses  for  the  Recovery  receiv- 
ing &  obtaining  of  the  same  as  I  myself  might  or  could  do  were 
I  personally  present  &  upon  receipt  of  the  same  Acquittances  & 

(47,  1787) 
other  sufficient  Discharges  for  me  &  in  my  Name  to  sign  Seal  & 
deliver  as  also  one  or  more  Attorney  or  Attomies  under  him  to 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  APRIL,  1787  509 

who  have  signed  and  delivered  these  presents,  are  notaries  in  this 
province  and  that  faith  should  be  given  to  instruments  which 
they  draw  up  as  well  in  judgments  as  elsewhere.  We  certify, 
furthermore,  that  the  stamped  paper  is  not  in  use  in  this  province. 
In  faith  of  which  we  have  signed  these  presents  and  have  thereon 
placed  the  seal  of  our  customary  coat  of  arms.  Given  at  Montreal 
in  our  mansion.  May  19,  1785.     Signed,  Hertel  de  Rouville. 

And  below  is  written :  I,  the  undersigned  Augustin  Dubuque, 
transfer  the  present  power  of  attorney  to  M.  Jean  Dumoulin, 
merchant,  to  carry  out  and  put  into  effect  in  all  its  contents  even 
as  I  could  have  done,  using  and  transmitting  it  in  my  place.  At 
Cahokia  November  17,  1785.  Signed  A.  Dubuque. 

And  now  the  said  power  of  attorney  has  been  delivered  by  me, 
the  undersigned  notary,  to  the  said  M.  Dubuque  the  said  day 
and  year. 

Aug.  Dubuque  Labuxiere. 

To-day,  the  twenty-fourth  of  April,  1787,  there  appeared  at 
the  office  of  the  jurisdiction  of  Cahokia  in  the  Illinois  M.  Hugh 
Heward,  bearer  of  the  following  documents  and  he  has  required 
the  registry  thereof  and  has  transcribed  them  in  the  present 
register  himself,  since  the  clerk  does  not  understand  the  English 
language,  as  follows: 

ist  piece. 

Know  all  men  by  these  presents  that  I,  John  Askins  of  Detroit, 
merchant,  have  made,  ordained,  constituted  and  appointed  and 
by  these  presents  do  make,  ordain,  constitute  and  appoint  and  in 
my  place  and  stead  put  and  depute  Mr.  Hugh  Heward  of  Detroit 
aforesaid  my  true  and  lawful  attorney  for  me  and  in  my  name  and 
for  my  use  to  ask,  demand,  recover  and  receive  of  and  from  any 
person  or  persons  indebted  to  me  or  any  of  my  former  co-partners; 
giving  and  granting  to  my  said  attorney  my  sole  and  full  power 
and  authority  to  take,  pursue  and  follow  such  legal  courses  for 
the  recovery,  receiving  and  obtaining  of  the  same  as  I  myself 
might  or  could  do,  were  I  personally  present;  and  upon  receipt 
of  the  same,  acquittances  and  other  sufficient  discharges  for  me 
and  in  my  name  to  sign,  seal  and  deliver;   as  also  one  or  more 


5IO  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

substitute  or  appoint  &  again  at  his  pleasure  to  revoke  &  further 
to  do  &  perform  &  execute  for  me  &  in  my  Name  all  singular 
Thing  or  Things  which  shall  or  may  be  necessary  touching  & 
concerning  the  premises  as  fully  &  entirely  as  I  the  said  John 
Askin  ought  or  could  do  in  &  about  the  same  or  as  if  more  especial 
authority  was  required  than  is  herein  given  —  ratifying  allowing 
&  confirming  whatever  my  said  Attorney  shall  lawfully  do  or 
cause  to  be  done  in  &  about  the  Premises  by  virtue  of  these 
presents. 

In  witness  whereof  I  have  hereunto  set  my  Hand  &  Seal  the 
fifteenth  Day  of  November  in  the  year  One  Thousand  Seven 
Hundred  &  Eighty  Six. 

(signed)  John  Askin 
Signed  Sealed  &  delivered  in  presence  of 

John  McCaslan  Witness  Et  a  linstant  Loriginal 

William  Park  Remis  a  M''  hugues  huvard 

Hugh  Heward  Labuxiere 

2nd. 
Know  all  men  by  these  presents  that  we  John  Askin  George 
Leith  &  Angus  Mackintosh  of  Detroit  &  Directors  of  the 
Miamis  Company  for  ourselves  &  in  behalf  of  the  said  Company 
have  made  ordain'd  Constituted  &  appointed  &  by  these  Pres- 
ents do  make  ordain  constitute  &  appoint  &  in  our  place  & 
Stead  put  &  depute  M^  Hugh  Heward  of  Detroit  aforesaid  our 
true  &  lawful  Attorney  for  us  &  in  behalf  of  the  said  Company 
in  our  names  &  for  our  use  to  Demand  recover  or  receive  of 
&  from  any  person  or  persons  indebted  to  the  said  Company 

(48, 1787) 
Giving  &  granting  to  our  said  Attorney  our  sole  &  full  power  & 
authority  to  take  pursue  &  follow  such  legal  Courses  for  the 
Recovery  receiving  &  obtaining  of  the  same  as  we  ourselves  might 
or  could  do  were  we  personally  present.  And  upon  the  Receipt 
of  the  same  Acquittances  &  other  sufficient  Discharges  for  us  &  in 
our  Names  to  sign  Seal  &  deliver  as  also  one  or  more  Attorney  or 
Attomies  under  him  to  substitute  or  appoint  &  again  at  his 
pleasure  to  revoke ;    &  further  to  do  &  perform  &  execute  for  us 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  APRIL,  1787  511 

attorney  or  attorneys  under  him  to  substitute  or  appoint  and  again 
at  his  pleasure  to  revoke;  and  further  to  do  and  perform  and  exe- 
cute for  me  and  in  my  name  all  singular  thing  or  things  which 
shall  or  may  be  necessary  touching  and  concerning  the  premises 
as  fully  and  entirely  as  I,  the  said  John  Askin,  ought  or  could 
do  in  and  about  the  same  or  as  if  more  special  authority  was 
required  than  is  herein  given ;  ratifying,  allowing  and  confirming 
whatever  my  said  attorney  shall  lawfully  do  or  cause  to  be  done 
in  and  about  the  premises  by  virtue  of  these  presents. 

In  witness  whereof  I  have  hereunto  set  my  hand  and  seal,  this 
fifteenth  day  of  November,  in  the  year  one  thousand  seven  hundred 
and  eighty-six.  Signed  John  Askin. 

Signed,  sealed  and  delivered  in  the  presence  of  John  McCaslan, 
witness  William  Park. 

And  now  the  original  was  returned  to  M.  Hugh  Heward. 
Hugh  Heward.  Labuxiere. 

2nd. 

Know  all  men  by  these  presents  that  we,  John  Askin,  George 
Leith  and  Angus  Mackintosh  of  Detroit  and  directors  of  the 
Miamis  Company,  for  ourselves  and  in  behalf  of  the  said  company 
have  made,  ordained,  constituted  and  appointed  and  by  these 
presents  do  make,  ordain,  constitute  and  appoint,  and  in  our 
place  and  stead  put  and  depute  Mr.  Hugh  Heward  of  Detroit, 
aforesaid,  our  true  and  lawful  attorney  for  us  and  in  behalf  of 
the  said  company,  in  our  names  and  for  our  use,  to  ask,  demand, 
recover  or  receive  of  and  from  any  person  or  persons  indebted 
to  the  said  company;  giving  and  granting  to  our  said  attorney 
our  sole  and  full  power  and  authority  to  take,  pursue  and  follow 
such  legal  courses  for  the  recovery,  receiving  and  obtaining  of 
the  same  as  we  ourselves  might  or  could  do,  were  we  personally 
present;  and  upon  receipt  of  the  same,  acquittances  and  other 
sufficient  discharges  for  us  and  in  our  names  to  sign,  seal  and 
deliver;  as  also  one  or  more  attorneys  under  him  to  substitute 
or  appoint  and  again  at  his  pleasure  to  revoke ;  and  further  to  do 
and  perform  and  execute  for  us  and  in  our  names  all  singular 
thing  or  things  which  shall  or  may  be  necessary,  touching  or 


512  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

&  in  our  Natfies  all  singular  Thing  or  Things  which  shall  or  may 
be  necessary  touching  or  concerning  the  premises  as  fully  & 
entirely  as  we  the  said  Directors  ought  or  could  do  in  &  about 
the  same  or  as  if  more  especial  Authority  was  required  than  is 
herein  given.  Ratifying  allowing  &  confirming  whatever  our 
said  Attorney  shall  lawfully  do  or  cause  to  be  done  in  &  about  the 
premises  by  Virtue  of  these  Presents. 

In  Witness  whereof  we  the  said  Directors  in  behalf  of  the  said 
Company  have  hereunto  set  Hands  &  Seals  the  Twentieth  Day 
of  November  in  the  Year  One  Thousand  Seven  Hundred  & 
Eighty  Six. 

(signed)  John  Askin 
Signed  Sealed  &  delivered  In  presence         Angus  Mackintosh 

of  John  McCaslan  Witness  George  Leith 

Mont  [illegible]  Trimble  a  Linstant  remis  a  M^  hugues 

huvard 
Hugh  Heward.  Labuxiere. 

Monsieur 

comme  vous  Nignores  pas  que  je  suis  Charge  par  ordre  de 
notre  Cour  de  la  succession  de  deffunt  M^  augustin  dubuque, 

(49,  1788) 

vous  avez  En  main  une  negresse  Et  Son  Enfant  a  luy  app*^  je 
vous  suplie  de  la  remetre  avec  son  Enfant  a  M^  aRondel  avec  qui 
je  me  suis  arrange  pour  la  Conduire  aux  Cahos  lieu  auquel 
Elle  doit  Etre  vendue  pour  le  compte  de  la  Sucession  ce  faisant  la 
presente  Lettre  que  je  vous  Envoy  par  M^  aRundel  vous  servira 
dample  decharge  par  son  recu  de  ladite  negrese  Et  son  Enfant 
que  vous  feres  metre  au  bas  de  la  presente  Crainte  de  tous  perils 
Et  Evenements  a  votre  decharge 

jay  Ecrit  au  mois  Novembre  dernier  par  le  detroit  Et  Rivierre 
des  ilinois  a  mad^  votre  soeur  Et  luy  marque  de  vous  Envoyer 
Sa  procuration,  ou  a  tout  autre  quelle  voudra  Choisir.  si  contre 
mon  atente  on  me  refusoit  la  Negresse  Et  son  Enfant  je  vous 
previens  que  je  la  laisse  sur  les  Risques  perils  Et  fortunes  de  qui 

1  John  Askins  was  a  merchant  and  fur-trader  of  Sandwich  township,  Ontario.  He  was 
serving  as  commissary  at  MichiUimackinac  in  1774.  Later  he  served  in  the  British  army  and 
was  retired  in  1812.     He  married  into  one  of  the  old  French  families  of  Detroit. — Mich. 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  APRIL,  1787  513 

concerning  the  premises  as  fully  and  entirely  as  we,  the  said 
directors,  ought  or  could  do  in  or  about  the  same  or  as  if  more 
special  authority  was  required  than  is  herein  given;  ratifying, 
allowing  and  confirming  whatever  our  said  attorney  shall  lawfully 
do  or  cause  to  be  done  in  and  about  the  premises  by  virtue  of  these 
presents. 

In  witness  whereof  we,  the  said  directors,  in  behalf  of  the  said 
company  have  hereunto  set  our  hands  and  seals,  the  twentieth 
day  of  November,  in  the  year  one  thousand  seven  hundred  and 
eighty  six. 

Signed,  sealed  and  delivered  in  the  presence  of  John  Mc- 
Caslan,  witness.  (Signed)  John  Askin.^ 

Mont[leUers  illegible]  Trimble.  Angus  Mackintosh. 

George  Leith. 
Now  it  was  returned  to  M. 
Hugh  Reward.  Hugh  Heward. 

Labuxiere. 

Sir:— 

As  you  are  not  ignorant  that  I  am  intrusted  by  order  of 
the  Court  with  the  estate  of  the  deceased  M.  Augustin  Dubuque 
and  you  have  in  your  possession  a  negress  and  her  child  belonging 
to  him,  I  pray  you  to  deliver  her  with  her  child  to  M.  Arundel, 
with  whom  I  have  made  arrangements  to  conduct  her  to  Cahokia, 
where  she  is  to  be  sold  for  the  account  of  the  estate.  By  doing 
this  the  present  letter,  which  I  am  sending  you,  will  serve  you  for 
a  full  discharge,  through  the  receipt  for  the  said  negress  and  her 
child  which  you  will  cause  to  be  written  at  the  bottom  of  the  pres- 
ent for  fear  of  all  perils  and  emergencies  in  regard  to  your  dis- 
charge. 

I  have  written  in  the  month  of  November  last  via  Detroit  and 
the  Illinois  river  to  Madame  your  sister  and  instructed  her  to 
send  to  you  her  power  of  attorney  or  to  any  other  whom  she 
wishes  to  choose.  If,  contrary  to  my  expectations,  the  negress 
and  her  child  are  refused  me,  I  warn  you  that  I  leave  her  at 

Pioneer  and  Hist.  Col.,  xxv.,  696.     The  Burton  library  of  Detroit,  Mich.,  contains  many  of 
his  papers. — Thwaites,  DescrijHive  List  of  MSS.  Collections,  124. 


514  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

il  apartiendra  me  reservant  En  ce  Gas  de  faire  mes  poursuites 
pour  et  au  profit  de  la  Sucession  contre  qui  javiseroy  Bon 
Etre.  cy  joint  la  lettre  original  a  nous  Ecritte  au  sujet  par  M^ 
Cruzat. 

Si  jay  differe  a  la  faire  transferer  icy  Le  mauvais  terns  et  les 
glaces  En  son  Causes  Et  Sur  ce  que  vous  maviez  dit  que  vous 
Lenveriez  par  une  ocasion  sure. 

jay  Ihonneur  detre  M^  Votre  serviteur  sign^  Labuxiere  le  lo 
mars  1788  a  M'^  Pratte  Neg*  a  S*^  genevieve. 

Lettre  de  M^  Cruzat  Ecritte  a  M^  saucier  presidant  de  La  Cour. 

Monsieur 

En  concequance  de  la  lettre  que  vous  mavez  Ecritte  hier  jay 
pass^  a  M'^  Prate  a  S*^  genevieve  lordre  de  tenir  a  la  disposition 
de  votre  Cour  Et  de  livrer  a  Sa  demande  la  negresse  qui  est  Ches 
luy  app*^  a  la  sucession  du  feu  aug*^"  dubuque  persuade  que  je 
suis  que  les  Creanciers  de  cette  Rive  suivront  dans  cette  Succession 
les  meme  droits  que  les  Creanciers  qui  sont  sur  la  votre.  jay 
Ihonneur  dEtre  tres  parfaitment  M^  votre  &c.  &c.  signe  francois 
Cruzat  S*  Louis  le  14  9^^^  1787  a  M^  f^  saucier  Magistrat  aux 
Cahos. 

(so,  1788.) 

Testament  de  james  moore 

aujourdhuy  premier  Septembre  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  huit 
est  comparu  le  S^  dorciere  faisant  pour  et  au  Nom  du  S^  Gabriel 
Cer^  absent  porteur  du  testament  de  james  moore  Lequel  nous 
en  a  pour  et  au  nom  dud*  S^  Cere  Requis  Lenregistrement  ainsi 
quil  Suit. 

AU  NOM  DE  DIEU  AMEN  moi  James  Moore  de  la  Belle- 
fontaine  du  pays  des  ilinois  Etant  en  parfaite  Sante  de  Corp 
desprit  et  de  memoire  je  rend  grace  a  dieu  de  rapeller  a  la  memoire 
la  mortalite  de  mon  corp  Et  Sachant  que  le  Sort  de  tout  homme 
est  de  mourir  une  fois  je  fais  ordonne  et  constitue  ce  present  mon 
testament  et  derniere  intention  cest  a  dire  principalement  et  la  pre- 
miere chose  de  toute  je  donne  et  recommande  mon  ame  entre  les 

^  See  decree  of  Court  in  this  case,  where  the  Spanish  creditors  were  not  given  the  same 
rights.     Supra,  p.  313. 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  MARCH,  1788  515 

the  risk,  peril  and  fortune  of  him  whom  it  shall  concern,  reserv- 
ing to  myself,  in  that  case,  to  make  my  suit  for  and  to  the 
profit  of  the  estate  against  whom  I  shall  think  it  to  be  right. 
Joined  herewith  is  the  original  letter  written  us  on  the  subject 
by  M.  Cruzat. 

If  I  have  deferred  having  her  transferred,  the  bad  weather 
and  the  ice  are  the  causes  thereof  and  also  because  you  said  that 
you  would  send  her  at  the  first  safe  opportunity. 

I  have  the  honor,  sir,  of  being  your  servant.  Signed  La- 
buxiere,  March  10,  1788.  To  M.  Pratte,  Merchant  at  Ste. 
Genevieve. 

Letter  of  M.  Cruzat  written  to  M.  Saucier,  President  of  the 
Court. 

In  consequence  of  the  letter  that  you  have  written  me  yester- 
day, I  have  given  to  M.  Pratte  at  Ste.  Genevieve  order  to  hold 
at  the  disposition  of  your  Court  and  to  deliver  on  its  demand  the 
negress  which  is  at  his  house  belonging  to  the  estate  of  the  late 
Augustin  Dubuque,  since  I  am  persuaded  that  the  creditors  of 
this  bank  will  enjoy  the  same  rights  in  this  estate  as  the  creditors 
who  are  on  your  bank  etc.^  Signed  Francois  Cruzat,  St.  Louis, 
November  14,  1787.  To  Francois  Saucier,  Magistrate  at  Cahokia. 
Testament  of  James  Moore. 

To-day  the  first  of  September,  1788,  there  appeared  M.  Dor- 
siere,  acting  for  and  in  the  name  of  M.  Gabriel  Cerr^,  absent, 
bearer  of  the  testament  of  James  Moore,  and  he  has,  for  and  in  the 
name  of  the  said  M.  Cerre,  required  the  registry  thereof,  as  follows: 

In  the  name  of  God,  amen,  I,  James  Moore  of  Bellefontaine 
of  the  country  of  the  Illinois,  being  in  perfect  health  of  body,  soul 
and  memory,  render  thanks  to  God  for  recalling  to  memory  the 
mortality  of  my  body;  and  knowing  that  the  lot  of  every  man  is 
to  die  once,  I  make,  ordain  and  constitute  this  present  my  last 
will  and  testament:  that  is  to  say,  firstly  and  the  first  of  all  I 
give  and  recommend  my  soul  into  the  hands  of  Almighty  God 
who  gave  it  and  I  recommend  my  body  to  the  earth  to  be  interred 
in  Christian  burial  and  the  funeral  to  the  direction  of  my  testa- 
mentary executors,  that  at  the  general  resurrection  I  may  receive  it 


5i6  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

mains  de  dieu  tout  puissant  qiii  la  donna  Et  je  recommande  mon 
corp  a  la  terre  pour  etre  Enterrd  dans  la  descence  Chretienne  les 
funerailles  a  la  direction  de  mes  executeurs  testamentaires  qu'a 
la  resurrection  .generale  je  ne  le  recoive  Encore  par  le  pouvoir 
Supreme  de  dieu  Et  quand  aux  biens  terestres  quil  a  plu  a  dieu 
de  me  donner  dans  cette  vie  je  donne  me  demet  et  dispose  desdits 
Biens  de  la  maniere  et  forme  Suivante. 

Premierement  je  donne  et  legue  a  Catherine  Moore  ma  femme 
Bien  aime  le  tier  de  tous  mes  Biens  tant  meubles  qu'immeubles 
apres  que  mes  debtes  Seront  tous  legitement  payees  cest  mon  in- 
tention que  je  veux  qu'on  execute  pendant  Son  veuvage  quant 
aux  Negres  Bingo  et  judik  cest  mon  intention  quils  retournent 
a  M^  Tobias  Barshares  Si  il  veut  les  reprendre  Et  Sen  rendre 
responsable  a  la  Sucession  de  jean  allison  Si  non  les  dits  negres 
Seront  vendus  a  lEncan  ou  vendus  particulierement  Si  les  Exe- 
cuteurs testamentaires  le  jugent  plus  Convenables  et  leur  pris 
assure  a  lusage  de  la  Sucession  de  feu  jean  allison:  tant  qua  toutes 
les  terres  que  je  possede  actuelement  cest  mon  intention  quelles 
Soient  Egalement  devisee  Entre  mes  Cinq  fils,  Excepte  que  mon 
fils  William  aura  deux  parts,  les  terres  defrichees  Seront  partag^es 
aussi  Bien  que  les  terres  En  Bois  Et  En  pagees  a  la  discretion 
des  executeurs  Si  apres  mentionnes.  je  donne  Egalement  a  Mon 
fils  William  le  Cheval  apelle  Pasbai,  Et  un  livre  apelle  ou  inti- 

(51,  1788.) 
tute  trajedies  de  tivay  Et  le  premier  volume  du  Spectateur,  Et 
a  mon  fils  jean  le  compagnon  du  jeune  homme.  et  pour  mon  fils 
James  les  oeuvres  dabraham  courley  Et  a  Henoch  le  Septieme 
volume  du  Spectateur  Et  a  Milton  le  paradis  perdu  de  milton 
Et  les  oeuvres  de  M^  Sauvage  intitule  le  vagabond;  Et  a  ma  fille 
marie  le  premier  volume  des  oeuvres  de  Shakespear,  avec  une 
partie  Egale  de  tous  mes  Biens  meubles.  et  tous  le  restant  de  livres 
Sera  Egalement  partage  Entre  tous,  Et  mon  fils  Wiliam  aura  mon 
violon.  jordonne  Et  constitue  pareillement  Gabriel  Cerre  Shad- 
rick  Bonde  Et  Thomas  Biggs  d'Etre  mes  Executeurs  de  ce  pres- 
ent testament  Et  mes  dernieres  volontes.  a  qui  je  recommande  de 

1  It  would  have  been  a  simple  matter  for  the  French  clerk  to  have  read  for  d'olway  the 
de  tivay  of  the  text.     Courley  is  certainly  Cowley. 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1788  517 

again  by  the  supreme  power  of  God;  and  as  to  the  temporal 
goods,  which  it  has  pleased  God  to  give  me  in  this  life,  I  give, 
devise  and  dispose  of  the  said  goods  in  the  manner  and  form 
following : 

Firstly,  I  give  and  bequeath  to  Catherine  Moore,  my  well 
beloved  wife,  the  third  of  all  my  property  both  personal  and  real, 
after  my  debts  shall  be  all  legitimately  paid;  it  is  my  intent  which 
I  wish  to  be  executed  during  her  widowhood.  As  to  the  negroes 
Bingo  and  Judik,  it  is  my  intent  that  they  return  to  M.  Tobias 
Barshares,  if  he  is  willing  to  take  them  back  and  to  hold  himself 
responsible  therefor  to  the  estate  of  John  Allison;  if  not,  the  said 
negroes  shall  be  sold  at  auction  or  sold  at  private  sale,  if  the  testa- 
mentary executors  judge  it  best,  and  their  price  assured  to  the 
use  of  the  estate  of  the  late  John  Allison ;  as  to  all  the  lands,  which 
I  possess  at  the  present  time,  it  is  my  intent  that  they  be  equally 
divided  between  my  sons  except  that  my  son,  William,  shall  have 
two  parts.  The  cleared  lands  shall  be  divided  as  well  as  those  in 
woods  and  in  farm-yard  at  the  discretion  of  the  executors  here- 
after mentioned.  I  give  equally  to  my  son,  William,  the  horse 
called  Pasbai  and  a  book  called  or  entitled  "  Tragedies  of  Otway  "^ 
and  the  first  volume  of  the  "Spectator";  and  to  my  son,  John, 
"  The  Companion  of  the  Young  Man" ;  and  to  my  son,  James,  the 
works  of  Abraham  Cowley;  and  to  Henoch,  the  seventh  volume 
of  the  "Spectator" ;  and  to  Milton,  "  The  Paradise  Lost"  of  Milton 
and  the  works  of  M.  Savage  entitled  "The  Vagabond";  and  to 
my  daughter  Mary,  the  first  volume  of  the  works  of  Shakespeare 
with  an  equal  part  of  all  my  personal  goods;  and  all  the  remaining 
books  shall  be  equally  divided  among  all;  my  son,  William,  shall 
have  my  violin.  I  ordain  and  constitute  likewise  Gabriel 
Cerre,  Shadrach  Bond  and  Thomas  Biggs  to  be  my  executors 
of  this  present  last  will  and  testament,  to  whom  I  recommend 
that  they  leave  all  my  property  in  the  hands  of  my  wife  during 
her  widowhood  until  the  boys  are  of  age;  and  that  at  that  time 
each  of  them,  as  they  Come  of  age,  withdraw  his  share;  but  if 
there  appears  to  the  testamentary  executors  that  there  is  the 
least  appearance  of  waste  in  the  property,  it  is  my  intent  that 


5i8  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

laisser  tous  les  Biens  entre  les  mains  de  ma  femme  pendant  Son 
veuvage  jusqua  ce  que  les  garjons  Soient  en  age  et  pour  lors 
chacun  d'eux  a  mesure  quils  viendront  En  age  tireront  leur  part 
mais  S'il  paroit  aux  Executeurs  testementaires  qu'il  y  ait  la  moin- 
dre  aparance  de  degat  dans  les  Biens.  cest  mon  intention  quil  le 
prenne  entre  leurs  mains  et  le  place  au  plus  avantageux  pour  le 
Benefice  des  Enfans  Et  par  le  present  je  desaprouve,  revoque 
et  Ennule  tous  les  autres  testaments  anterieurs  a  celui  ci  ainsi 
que  les  Executeurs  par  moi  nommes  ci  devant  dans  mes  pre- 
cedants  legs  et  intentions,  je  rattifie  Et  confirme  ce  present,  et 
aucun  autre  pour  etre  mon  testament  et  mes  dernieres  intentions. 
En  concequance  de  quoy  jy  ay  pose  ma  Signature  Et  mon  cachet 
ce  trente  unieme  jour  de  May,  Lan  de  notre  Seigneur  mil  Sept 
cent  quatre  vingt  sept  signe  James  Moore  j cachet}  signe  Cachet^ 
L(i  prononce  et  declare  par  led^  James  moore  comme  Son  testament 
Et  Ses  dernieres  intentions  en  presence  de  nous  qui  en  sa  presence 
Et  en  presence  de  chacun  de  Nous  avons  Signe  nos  Noms  ci  des- 
sous  Signe  Michel  Huff — John  Slaughter  +  Sa  marque  —  frs. 
Clark — et  plus  Bas  est  Ecrit  je  certiffie  la  presente  traduction 
Conforme  a  la  original  Signe  L  Dorsiere 

Enregistre  conforme .  a  la  traduction   par   moy  N^^   Publique 
Soussigue. 

Labuxiere  N^^  P. 
aujourdhuy  troisieme  jour  de  Septembre  mil  Sept  cent  quatre 
vingt  huit  est  comparu  au  greffe  et  Notaria  du  poste  des  cahos 
aux  ilinois  le  S^  jean  B^^  Dumay  habitant  dud*  lieu  porteur  de 
Son  contract  de  mariage  avec  felicite  Peltier  Son  Epouze  passe 
devant  M^  Labuxiere  N^^  aud*  lieu  des  cahos  En  datte  du  dix^ 
jour  de  juin  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  Six  par  lequel  il  apert  la 
donnation  que  led*  Comparant  a  fait  de  tous  Ses  Biens  meubles 
Et  immeubles  quil  laissera  au  jour  Et  heure  de  Son  trepas  a  ladite 
felicite  Peltier,  la  dite  donnation  portee  Sur  Son  Contract  de 
mariage  contenant  ce  qui  Suit.  Et  ledit  futur  Epoux  pour  donner 
des  preuves  dune  veritable  affection  a  ladite  future  Epouse  et  luy 
marquer  qu'il  veut  Bien  Servir  d'un  veritable  pere  a  Ses  Enfans 
ayant  accept^  leur  tutelle  p^  veiller  a  leurs  interest  et  les  aider  de 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  SEPTEMBER,  1788  519 

they  take  it  in  their  hands  and  place  it  to  the  best  advantage 
for  the  interest  of  the  children.  And  by  the  present  I  disapprove, 
revoke  and  annul  all  other  testaments  previous  to  this  as  well  as 
the  executors  named  by  me  herebefore  in  my  previous  wills  and 
testaments.  I  ratify  and  confirm  this  present  and  no  other  to 
be  my  last  will  and  testament;  in  consequence  of  which  I  have  set 
thereon  my  signature  and  my  seal,  this  thirty-first  day  of  May  in 
the  year  of  our  Lord  1787.  Signed  James  Moore  jggaif  Signed, 
sealed,  read,  pronoimced  and  declared  by  the  said  James  Moore  to 
be  his  last  will  and  testament  in  his  presence  and  in  the  presence 
of  us,  who,  in  his  presence  and  in  the  presence  of  each  of  us,  have 
signed  our  names  hereunder.  Signed  Michel  Huff,  John  Slaugh- 
ter +  his  mark,  Francis  Clark.  And  below  is  written,  I  certify 
that  the  present  translation  conforms  to  the  original.  Signed,  L. 
Dorsiere. 

Registered,  according  to  the  translation,  by  me,  the  undersigned 
notary  pubhc. 

Labuxiere,  N.  P. 


To-day,  the  third  day  of  September,  1788,  there  appeared 
at  the  office  and  notariat  of  the  post  of  Cahokia  in  the  Illinois, 
M.  Jean  Bte.  Dumay,  inhabitant  of  the  said  place,  bearer  of  his 
contract  of  marriage  with  Felicite  Pelletier,  his  wife,  passed  before 
M.  Labuxiere,  notary,  in  the  said  place  of  Cahokia  under  date 
of  the  tenth  day  of  June,  1786,  in  which  there  appears  the  donation 
which  the  said  appearer  has  made  of  all  his  property,  personal  and 
real,  which  he  shall  leave  on  the  day  and  hour  of  his  death,  to  the 
said  Felicity  Pelletier.  The  said  donation  is  contained  in  his  con- 
tract of  marriage  and  is  as  follows:  And  the  said  future  husband, 
in  order  to  give  proofs  of  a  veritable  affection  to  the  said  future 
wife  and  to  show  her  that  he  wishes  to  serve  as  a  true  father  to  her 
children,  the  guardianship  of  whom  he  has  accepted,  to  watch  over 


520  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Ses  avis  Et  conseil  Et  marquer  a  la  future  Epouse  une  veritable 
amiti^,  il  luy  a  fait  a  EUe  Seule  donnation  pure  Simple  Entre  vif 
Et  a  jamais  irrevocable  En  la  meilleure  forme  que  donnation 
puisse  valoir  de  tous  les  Biens  meubles  et  immeubles  quil  lais- 
sera  au  jour  et  heure  de  Son  trepas  En  cas  quil  decedde  Sans  En- 
fans  avant  la  dite  future  epouse  Et  meme  de  ladite  somme  de  dix 
mille  Sept  cent  quatre  livres  port^e  En  Linvantaire  dud*  dumay 
pour  en  jouir  disposer  et  apartenir  a  ladite  future  Epouse  Sans 
retour  comme  de  Chose  a  Elle  apartenante  de  plain  luy  en  don- 
nant  toute  propriete  Sans  que  personne  y  puisse  pretendre  au- 
cunne  Chose,  comme  un  bien  quil  a  acquis  et  gagn^  par  ces  pen- 
ibles  travaux  dont  ladite  future  Epouse  Sera  libre  de  disposer  a 
sa  mort  En  faveur  de  qui  Bon  lui  semblera  Sans  que  les  Enfans 
dud*  picart  Son  premier  mary  Et  dEUe  puisse  pretendre  aucunne 
chose  que  ce  quelle  voudra  Bien  leur  donner  cette  presente  don- 
nation ainsi  faite  toutes  fois  au  Cas  quil  ny  ait  aucunes  enfans 
vivants  nfez  ni  a  naitre  dud*  futur  mariage  dud*  dumay  et  de  la- 
dite future  Epouse  car  au  cas  dEnfant  ladite  donnation  Sera  nule 
de  plain  droit  et  Sans  difficulte  &c.  Ce  requerant  led*  jean  B*^ 
dumay  insinuation  de  la  dite  donnation,  Nous  lavons  insinu^ 
et  enregistre  Sur  les  registres  de  cette  jurisdiction  apres  en  avoir 
fait  lecture,  pour  servir  Et  valoir  ce  que  de  raison  a  la  dite  felictie 
peltier.  et  a  ledit  dumay  fait  sa  marque  ot6F^  ne  sachant  signer 
lesd*  jour  et  an 

marque  +  de  Labuxiere 

jean  B*^  dumay 


aujourdhuy  vingt  quatre  mars  mil  sept  Cent  quatre  vingt  neuf 
est  comparu  jean  marie  dorion  tuteur  de  la  mineure  lamarche 
demeurant  aux  Cahos  lequel  nous  a  requis  lenregistrement  du 
billet  cy  apres. 

Je  Joseph  Robidoub  Soussign^  declare  devoir  Et  promet  payer 
dans  le  courant  du  mois  doctobre  de  lannee  mil  sept  cent  quatre 
vingt  dix  a  lordre  de  M^  jean  marie  dorion  la  Somme  de 
sept   Cent  piastres  En  Bon  courant  ou  la  valeur  en  pelterie  de 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  MARCH,  1789  521 

their  interests  and  to  aid  them  with  his  counsel,  and  to  show  the 
future  wife  a  true  affection,  has  made  to  her  alone  a  true  and 
simple  donation  inter  vivos  and  irrevocable,  in  the  best  form  that 
donation  can  be  made  valid,  of  all  the  personal  and  real  property 
which  he  shall  leave  on  the  day  and  hour  of  his  death,  in  case  that 
he  dies  without  children  before  the  said  future  wife,  and  also  of 
the  said  sum  of  ten  thousand  seven  hundred  livres  contained  in 
the  inventory  of  the  said  Dumay,  to  enjoy,  dispose  of  and  to 
belong  to  the  said  future  wife  without  requital  as  a  thing  belong- 
ing to  her,  and  he  gives  it  to  her  in  full  proprietorship  so  that  no 
person  can  make  any  pretense  thereto,  as  it  is  property  which  he 
has  acquired  by  his  labor,  of  which  the  said  future  wife  shall  be 
free  to  dispose  at  her  death  in  favour  of  whom  it  seems  best  to 
her,  and  so  that  the  children  of  the  said  Picart,  her  first  husband, 
and  of  herself  can  make  claim  to  nothing  except  what  she  shall 
be  willing  to  give  them.  This  present  donation  is  so  made, 
however,  in  case  only  that  there  are  no  living  children  born  or  to  be 
bom  of  the  said  future  marriage  of  the  said  Dumay  and  the  said 
future  wife.  In  case  of  a  child  the  said  donation  shall  be  null  in 
full  right  and  without  difficulty  etc.  The  said  Jean  Bte.  Dumay 
requiring  the  registration  of  the  said  donation,  we  have  inscribed 
and  registered  it  on  the  records  of  this  magistracy,  after  having 
made  a  reading  thereof,  that  it  may  be  of  use  and  validity  to  the 
said  Felicity  Pelletier,  of  which  this  act  will  testify.  And  the  said 
Dumay  has  made  his  mark,  not  knowing  how  to  sign,  the  said  day 
and  year. 

Mark  +  of  Labuxiere. 

Jean  Bte.  Dumay. 

To-day,  the  twenty-fourth  of  March,  1789,  there  appeared 
Jean  Marie  Dorion,  guardian  of  the  minors  Lamarche,  dwelling 
at  Cahokia,  who  has  required  of  us  the  registration  of  the  follow- 
ing note: 

I,  the  undersigned  Joseph  Robidou,  declare  that  I  owe  and 
promise  to  pay  in  the  course  of  the  month  of  October  of  the  year, 
1790,  to  the  order  of  M.  Jean  Marie  Dorion  the  sum  of  seven  hun- 
dred piastres  in  current  bons,  or  the  value  in  peltries  of  receipt  at 


522  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

(S2,    1789.) 

Recette  au  prix  Courant  de  Lecheance  pour  un  Negre  quil  ma 
vendue  Nomm^  Minan  ag^  dEnviron  trente  Cinq  ans  provenant 
de  la  Sucession  de  feu  Buet  Et  pour  plus  grande  Surete  du  S^ 
dorion.  je  Soussign^  auguste  Chouteaud  me  rend  garant  Et  caution 
de  la  Susdite  Somme  de  Sept  cent  piastres  Et  m'oblige  la  payer 
comme  En  faisant  ma  propre  affaire  Et  debte  comme  principal 
debiteur  a  S*  Louis  le  vingt  Mars  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  neuf. 
signd  J  H  Roubidoub.  p'".  caution  aug*®  Chouteau.  700  Piastres. 

Et  a  linstant  remis  led*  Billet  En  original  aud*  S^  jean  marie 
dorion  qui  a  declard  ne  savoir  signer  et  a  fait  sa  marque  ord^®. 

marque  de  +  Jean  Marie  dorion  Labuxiere  greffier 

W  Arundel  temoin 

Know  All  Men  by  these  presents  that  we  Edward  William  Gray 
Esquire  William  Goodall,  John  Lilly,  Peter  Bouthiellier,  and 
Robert  Cruickshanks  merchants  executers  of  the  last  will  and 
Testiment  of  William  Kay  late  of  Montreal  in  the  district  of 
Montreal,  in  the  Province  of  Quebec  merchant  deceas'd  Have 
made  Ordained,  authorized,  constituted  and  appointed  and  by 
these  presents  DO  make  Ordain,  authorize,  constitute  and  appoint 
Josiah  Bleakley  late  of  michelimakinac,  but  now  of  Montreal 
aforesaid  merchant.  Our  true  and  Lawful  attorney,  for  us,  and  in 
our  name  or  (otherwise)  and  to  and  for  our  use  as  Executors  as 
aforesaid,  to  ask  demand  sue  for  recover  and  receive  of  and  from 
all  and  every  person  or  persons  whatsoever  whom  it  doth,  shall 
or  may  concern,  and  particularly  of  and  from  David  McCrai, 
David  McCrai  and  Co,  Pierre  antoine  Tabeau,  Jean  Baptiste 
morelle,  James  Aaron  Holt,  and  Charles  Gratiot  at  michel- 
makinac  or  elsewhere  in  the  upper  Country,  all  such  sum  and 
Sums  of  money  Debts  Dues  and  Demands  whatsoever,  as  are  due, 
owing  payable  or  belonging  to  the  said  William  Kay  at  the  time  of 
his  Decease,  and  now  are  or  hereafter  may  become  due,  owing, 
payable  or  belonging  to  as  the  Executors  of  his  said  last  Will  and 
Testament,  for  or  by  reason  of  any  cause,  matter  or  thing  what- 
soever and  to  compound  and  agree  to  take  less  than  the  whole  for 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1789  523 

the  current  price  at  maturity,  for  a  negro,  which  he  has  sold 
me,  named  Minan,  aged  about  thirty-five  years,  coming  from 
the  estate  of  the  late  Buyat;  and  for  greater  security  of  M.  Dorion, 
I,  the  undersigned  Auguste  Chouteau,  hold  myself  as  guarantor 
and  surety  of  the  aforesaid  sum  of  seven  hundred  piastres  and 
pledge  myself  to  pay  it  as  if  it  was  my  own  business  and  debt  as 
principal  debtor.  At  St.  Louis,  the  twentieth  of  March,  1789. 
Signed,  J.  H.  Robidou.  For  surety,  Auguste  Chouteau,  700 
piastres. 

And  now  the  said  note  in  original  was  returned  to  the  said 
M.  Jean  Marie  Dorion,  who  has  declared  that  he  did  not  know 
how  to  sign  and  has  made  his  mark. 

Mark  of  +  Jean  Marie  Dorion.  Labuxiere,  Clerk. 

W.  Arundel,  witness. 

Know  all  men  by  these  presents  that  we,  Edward  William  Gray 
Esquire,  William  Goodall,  John  Lilly,  Peter  Bouthiellier  and 
Robert  Cruickshanks,  merchants,  executors  of  the  last  will  and 
testament  of  William  Kay,  late  of  Montreal  in  the  district  of 
Montreal  in  the  province  of  Quebec,  merchant  deceased,  have 
made,  ordained,  authorized,  constituted  and  appointed  and  by 
these  presents  do  make,  ordain,  authorize,  constitute  and  appoint 
Josiah  Bleakley,  late  of  Michillimakinac  but  now  of  Montreal 
aforesaid,  merchant,  our  true  and  lawful  attorney,  for  us  and  in 
our  name  or  (otherwise)  and  to  and  for  our  use,  as  executors  as 
aforesaid,  to  ask,  demand,  sue  for,  recover  and  receive  of  and  from 
all  and  every  person  of  persons  whatsoever  whom  it  doth,  shall  or 
may  concern,  and  particularly  of  and  from  David  McCrae,  David 
McCrae  and  Co,  Pierre  Antoine  Tabeau,  Jean  Baptiste  Morelle; 
James  Aaron  Holt  and  Charles  Gratiot  at  Michillimakinac  or 
elsewhere  in  the  upper  country,  all  such  sum  and  sums  of  money, 
debts,  dues  and  demands  whatsoever,  as  are  due,  owing,  payable 
or  belonging  to  the  said  William  Kay  at  the  time  of  his  decease, 
and  now  are  or  herafter  may  become  due,  owing,  payable  or 
belonging  to  as  the  executors  of  his  said  last  will  and  testament, 
for  or  by  reason  of  any  cause,  matter  or  thing  whatsoever  and  to 
compound  and  agree  to  take  less  than  the  whole  for  all  or  any  of 


524  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

all  or  any  of  the  debts  or  Demands  aforesaid,  where  the  whole  in 
all  appearance  cannot  be  got,  And  upon  payment,  recovery  or 
receipt  thereof  or  of  any  part  or  parts  thereof.  Acquittances,  or 
other  Good  and  sufficient  discharges  in  the  Law  for  the  same,  for 
us  and  in  our  names  as  Executors  as  aforesaid  accordingly  to  make. 
Seal  and  deliver,  and  Generally  to  do,  transact,  manage  and 
perform  all  other  matters  and  things  any  wise  relating  to  the 
premises  in  such  manner  as  to  our  said  attorney  shall  appear  most 
advisable  and  Expedient  as  fully  amply  and  effectually  in  all 
respects  as  if  the  most  special  powers  were  to  our  Said  Attorney 
for  the  purposes  aforesaid  by  us  given,  or  as  we  ourselves  might 
or  could  do  personally,  AND  an  Attorney  or  Attomies  under  him 
for  the  purposes  aforesaid,  with  the  like  or  more  limited  powers, 
to  make  and  at  his  pleasure  to  revoke. 

HEREBY  allowing  ratifying  and  confirming  all  and  what- 
soever our  said  Attorney  or  his  Substitute  or  Substitutes  shall 
Lawfully  do  or  cause  to  be  done  in  or  about  the  Premises  by  Virtue 
of  these  Presents  IN  WITNESS  whereof  we  have  hereunto  sett 
our  hands  &  Seals  the  twenty  fifth  day  of  April  in  the  Year  of  Our 
Lord  One  thousand  Seven  Hundred  &  Eighty  Eight. 
Signed  SeaPd  and  Edw^  Wm  Gray  [ls] 

deliver'd  in  the  presence  of  W  Goodall  [ls] 

J^  Bouthillier  John  Lilly  [ls] 

Sami  Genard  P  Bouthillier        [ls] 

R  Cruickshank     [ls] 

Lequel  Enregistrement  a  Et6  fait  a  la  requisition  du  M^  Charles 
Grassiot  conforme  a  loriginal  Et  transcrit  par  me  jean  dumoulin 
Neg*  au  deffaud  par  moy  N^«  d'Entendre  la  langue  Englaise 
aux  Cahos  le  28  8^^^  1788 

Ch  Gratiot 
J"  Dumoulin 
Josiah  Bleakley 


CLERK'S  RECORD,  OCTOBER,  1788  525 

the  debts  or  demands  aforesaid,  where  the  whole  in  all  appearance 
cannot  be  got;  and  upon  payment,  recovery  or  receipt  thereof 
or  of  any  part  or  parts  thereof,  acquittances  or  other  good  and  suf- 
ficient discharges  in  the  law  for  the  same,  for  us  and  in  our  names 
as  executors  as  aforesaid,  accordingly  to  make,  seal  and  deliver 
and  generally  to  do,  transact,  manage  and  perform  all  other  matters 
and  things  anywise  relating  to  the  premises  in  such  manner  as 
to  our  said  attorney  shall  appear  most  advisable  and  expedient 
as  fully,  amply  and  effectually  in  all  respects  as  if  the  most  special 
powers  were  to  our  said  attorney  for  the  purposes  aforesaid  by  us 
given,  or  as  we  ourselves  might  or  could  do  personally;  and  an 
attorney  or  attorneys  under  him  for  the  purposes  aforesaid,  with  the 
like  or  more  limited  powers,  to  make  and  at  his  pleasure  to  re- 
voke. 

Hereby  allowing,  ratifying  and  confirming  all  and  whatsoever 
our  said  attorney,  or  his  substitute  or  substitutes  shall  lawfully 
do  or  cause  to  be  done  in  or  about  the  premises  by  virtue  of  these 
presents.  In  witness  whereof  we  have  hereunto  set  our  hands  and 
seals  the  twenty-fifth  day  of  April  in  the  year  of  the  Lord,  one 
thousand  seven  hundred  and  eighty-eight. 

Signed,  sealed  and  Edw.  Wm.  Gray  [LS] 

delivered  in  the  presence  of  Wm.  Goodell  [LS] 

Jn.  Bouthiellier  Jonne  Lilly  [LS] 

Samuel  Genard.  P.  Bouthiellier  [LS] 

R.  Cruickshank  [LS] 

This  registry  was  made  on  the  requisition  of  M.  Charles  Gra- 
tiot and  conforms  to  the  original  and  was  transcribed  by  me, 
Jean  Dumoulin,  merchant,  in  default  of  a  knowledge  of  the 
English  language  by  me,  notary,  at  Cahokia,  October  28,  1788. 

Ch.  Gratiot. 

Jean  Dumoulin. 

JosiahvBleakley. 


CAHOKIA  DOCUMENTS. 

French 
Gratiot  to  G.  R.  Clark,  February  3,  1779. 
Monsieur 

Je  suis  au  desespoir  que  mes  affaires  icy  soyent  dans  le  cas  de 
me  priver  de  me  joindre  avec  nos  jeunes  gens,  pour  vous  prouver 
le  desir  que  j'aurois  en  toute  occasion  de  vous  temoigner  mon 
attachem^  et  mon  Zele  en  tout  ce  qui  vous  regarde,  et  vous  as- 
surer en  meme  terns  de  1 'affection  que  vous  vous  ete  sy  dignement 
acquise  de  tous  les  citoyens  de  ce  Village,  dont  je  me  flatte  que 
dans  toute  les  occasions  vous  les  verres  Zele  et  devoue  entiere- 
ment  a  tout  ce  qui  conserne  les  Interest  de  la  Cause  dont  vous 
etes  le  deffenseur  dans  ce  pays.  Pour  ce  qui  me  regarde,  comme 
je  suis  dans  la  triste  Necessite  de  rester,  cy  je  puis  vous  etre  icy 
de  quelques  utilite,  j'espere  que  vous  n'epargneres  pas  dans 
auqu'une  occasion  celui  qui  est  pour  la  vie 

Votre  tres  humble  &  Devoue 

Serviteur  Ch  Gratiot 

NB:    Mes  respect  s'il  vous   plait  le   Cap"  Bowman 

et  tous  vos  officers  vous  obligere  infiniment  C  G^. 

Aux  Cahos  le  3^  Fevrier  1779 

[On  the  reverse]  Jespere  qu'au  Retour  de  votre  Campagne 
nous  aurons  le  plaisir  de  vous  voir  en  notre  Village,  et  que  vous 
viendres  avec  vos  Messieurs  nous  aider  a  boire  Notre  Vin,  dont 
je  crains  bien  que  cy  vous  tardis  longtems  il  ne  Surisse  de  telle 
maniere  quil  n'y  ast  plus  moyen  den  boire. 

1  The  following  documents  come  from  several  archives.  This  collection  does  not  con- 
tain all  the  stray  papers  from  Cahokia  of  the  period,  but  it  does  contain  all  the  important 
known  documents,  hitherto  unprinted.  Several  documents  from  the  Z>r.  MSS.  were  published 
by  F.J.  Turner  in  Anier.  Hist.  Rev.,  viii.,  491  et  seq.  Other  papers  have  been  printed  by 
M.  I.  J.  Griffin  in  Amer.  Calh.  Hist.  Researches,  New  Series,  ii.,  3.  The  classification  into 
French  and  English  documents  was  necessitated  by  the  composition  of  the  book. 


526 


CAHOKIA  DOCUMENTS.^ 

FRENCH. 

Gratiot  to  G.  R.  Clark,  February  3,  1779.^ 
Sir: 

1  am  in  despair  because  my  affairs  here  are  in  such  condition 
that  they  prevent  me  from  joining  with  our  young  men,  in  order  to 
prove  to  you  the  desire  which  I  have  of  testifying  to  you  on  every 
occasion  my  attachment  and  zeal  in  all  that  concerns  you,  and  to 
assure  you  at  the  same  time  of  the  affection,  which  you  have  so 
worthily  earned  from  all  the  citizens  of  this  village,  whom,  I  flat- 
ter myself,  you  will  see  on  all  occasions  zealous  for  and  entirely 
devoted  to  everything  which  concerns  the  interest  of  the  cause,  of 
which  you  are  the  defender  in  this  country.  As  far  as  I  am  con- 
cerned, since  I  am  under  the  sad  necessity  of  remaining  behind, 
if  I  can  be  of  any  use  here,  I  hope  that  you  will  not  spare,  on  any 
occasion,  him  who  is  for  life 

your  very  humble  and  devoted  servant, 

Charles  Gratiot. 
N.  B.     My  respects,  please,  to  Captain  Bowman  and  all  your 
ofl&cers  and  you  will  oblige  infinitely 

C.  Gratiot. 
At  Cahokia,  February  3,  1779. 
[On  the  reverse]  I  hope  that  on  the  return  from  your  campaign 
we  shall  have  the  pleasure  of  seeing  you  in  our  village  and  that  you 
will  come  with  your  gentlemen  to  aid  us  in  drinking  our  wine,  but 
I  fear  that  if  you  delay  a  long  time,  it  will  come  about  that  there 
will  be  no  longer  means  of  drinking  any. 

2  Dr.  MSS.,  49J3,  original  manuscript.  The  letter  was  written  to  Clark  at  the  time  he 
was  preparing  to  set  out  for  Vincennes.  Dr.  Louise  Phelps  Kellogg  kindly  collated  the  proof 
of  all  the  documents  from  the  Draper  MSS.,  printed  in  this  volume,  with  the  originals. 


527 


528  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

McCarty  to  his  Wefe,  April  28,  1779. 
Ma  chere  femme  Voila  la  derniere  foy  que  je  vous  ecrit  cet 
anne  un  des  postes  de  St.  Martin  et  celuy  par  votre  frere  laid  &c. 
depuis  quelque  terns  je  necesse  de  rever  de  vous  et  ma  chere  fiUe 
je  vouderette  a  dieu  que  vous  pouvroient  etre  ici,  je  craigne  fort 
pour  eux  et  vous  tacher  ma  chere  femme  de  venir  avec  quelqu'un 
me  rejoindre  ici  avec  eux  est  il  possible  ma  chere  que  vous  ne 
pouvroit  point  trouver  quelqu'un  Voila  Mad.  la  Captitaine  Mc- 
Durald  souhait  que  vous  estoit  ici  pour  me  voire  en  ma  habit 
d'ordonnance  Je  suis  Capitaine  dans  la  Bataillon  des  Islnois  et 
aide  de  Camp  du  Commandant  en  chef  du  department  ouest. 
Voila  vous  me  dira  bien  de  avancement  subite  mais  il  est  vray; 
je  cherche  dans  cet  temps  de  trouble  de  affixer  un  Bien  etre  pour 
nos  Enfants  et  je  ne  pent  le  faire  pour  nous,  mais  cy  vous  estoit 
rie  vous  seray  bien  en  cas  de  ma  mort,  Votre  pention  est  assure 
en  s'adressant  a  I'Etat  ou  Republique  de  Virginie.  Mon  Moulin 
en  mon  absence  par  la  grand  Abbat  de  pluie  est  encore  partes 
mais  mon  General  m'ait  promis  de  faire  camper  un  Regement 
dans  le  beau  temps  au  moulin  pour  la  remettre  tacher  done  ma 
chere  femme  de  venir  me  joindre  je  ne  doute  point  que  vous  en- 
tenderoient  parler  de  moy  car  j'ai  eu  Bon  part  dans  la  prise  de 
Gouverneur  Hamilton  et  je  me  flatte  que  je  lui  ait  rendii  service 
dont  il  a  eu  besoin  par  sa  meurteure  qu'il  faisoit  commettre 
journalm^  sur  les  femmes  et  les  Enfants  de  mes  Compatriotes  et 
je  croy  que  cy  le  Traitteur  de  Mississippi  me  rend  justice  je  suis 
chere  a  eux  par  le  soin  que  je  en  ai  prise  vis  a  vis  les  sauvages  &c. 
et  que  je  prend  constammnet.  Chere  femme  tacher  de  me  rejoin- 
dre et  votre  famille,  vous  cousine  espere  cela  au  moins  cy  vous 
me  haissoit  point  je  suis  en  esperant  de  vous  y  voire  avec  estime 
et  respect  a  grand  mere,  mama  oncle  Baby  &  Tant  &  les  francais 
sont  nos  allies. 

Votre  affection^  marie 
Richard  M.  Carty  Capne 

Islinois  Batallion 

1  Can.  Archives,  B.,  182,  p.  71,  from  a  copy.    All  the  copies  from  the  Haldimand  Collec- 
tion printed  in  this  volume  were  furnished  by  the  Canadian  Archives . 


LETTER  FROM  McCARTY,  APRIL,  1779  529 

McCarty  to  His  Wife,  April  28,  1779.* 
My  dear  wife: — This  is  the  last  time  that  I  shall  write  you  this 
year,  one  by  the  posts  of  St.  Martin  and  that  by  your  brother  etc.* 
For  some  time  past  I  have  had  to  dream  of  you  and  my  dear 
daughter.  I  wish  to  God  that  you  might  be  here,  since  I  have  great 
fear  for  them  and  you.  Try,  my  dear  wife,  to  come  with  some 
one  to  join  me  here  with  them.  Is  it  possible,  my  dear,  that  you 
cannot  find  any  one  ?  There  is  Madame  Captain  McDurald  who 
wishes  that  you  were  here  to  see  me  in  my  uniform  of  orderly.  I 
am  captain  in  the  Illinois  battalion  and  aid-de-camp  of  the  com- 
mander in  chief  of  the  western  department.  There  you  are,  you 
will  tell  me,  very  suddenly  advanced ;  but  it  is  true  I  am  seeking  in 
this  time  of  trouble  to  establish  a  fortune  for  our  children  and  I 
cannot  do  it  for  ourselves;  but  if  that  be  nothing  to  you[?],  you 
will  be  well  fixed  in  case  of  my  death.  Your  pension  is  assured 
by  sending  to  the  State  or  Republic  of  Virginia.  My  mill  in  my 
absence  has  been  carried  away  by  the  great  downpour  of  rain; 
but  my  general  has  promised  me  that  he  will  have  a  regiment  en- 
camp in  the  spring  at  the  mill  in  order  to  set  it  up  again.  Try 
then,  my  dear  wife,  to  come  and  join  me.  No  doubt  you  have 
heard  people  speak  of  me,  for  I  was  prominent  in  the  capture  of 
Governor  Hamilton,  and  I  flatter  myself  that  I  rendered  him 
service,  of  which  he  has  had  need  on  account  of  the  murders, 
which  he  has  caused  to  be  committed  daily  on  the  wives  and 
children  of  my  compatriots;  and  I  believe  that,  if  the  traders 
of  the  Mississippi  render  me  justice,  I  am  dear  to  them  on 
account  of  the  care  which  I  have  taken  against  the  savages  etc 
and  which  I  am  taking  constantly.  Dear  wife,  try  to  join  me  and 
your  family;  your  cousin  hopes  it,  if  you  do  not  hate  me.  I  am 
living  in  hope  of  seeing  you  here.  With  esteem  and  respect  to 
grandmother,  mamma,  uncle,  baby  and  aunt;  and  the  French  are 
our  allies. 

Your  affectionate  husband 

Richard  McCarty, 
Captain  Illinois  Battalion. 

2  The  first  sentence,  like  others  in  the  letter,  is  difficult  to  interpret. 


530  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Cahos  28  avril  1779 

Addressed  a  Madame  MacCarty  Chez  sa  mere  a  MontreaL 

Endorsed:    Letter  from  one  Richard  MacCarty  at  Cahos  to 
his  wife  at  Montreal,  dated  the  28th  April  1779.     Rec*^  the  24th 
of  July. 
Inhabitants  of   Cahokia  to  G.  R.  Clark,  April  ii,  1780. 

A  L'Honorable  George  Rogers  Clark  Equier 

Colonel  et  Commandant  en  Chef  des  troupes  de  I'Etat  de  Vir- 
ginie  dans  le  Comt^  des  Illinois  et  ses  dependances  &c:  &c:  &c: 
Monsieur 

Dans  la  situation  deplorable  ou  nous  nous  trouvons  d  present, 
nous  vous  deputons  la  personne  de  Monsieur  Charles  Gratiot  I'un 
de  nos  citoyens,  pour  vous  representer  notre  detresse,  et  la  Calamity 
ou  les  Nations  Sauvage  de  tous  cotds  nous  Reduisent;  Nous  Sommes 
a  la  Veille  d'etre  attaqu^  dans  notre  Village  par  des  Partis  consid- 
erable de  Sauvages,  et  de  ne  pouvoir  travailler  a  la  Culture  de 
nos  terres  cy  nous  N'avons  de  prompt  Secours;  C'est  pourquoi  nous 
prenons  la  liberty  de  nous  adresser  a  vous,  par  la  confiance  et 
I'esperance  que  nous  avons  de  votre  bont6  et  de  I'affection  que 
vous  nous  aves  toujours  temoignee,  Mais  ce  qui  nous  afflige  le 
plus  en  cas  que  vous  envoya  tant  icy  du  Monde,  que  nous  n'eus- 
sions  pas  les  provisions  qui  leur  Seraint  necessaire;  Monsieur 
Gratiot  pouve  facilement  vous  instruire  des  facult^s  de  notre 
village  et  1 'avons  charge  de  conferer  avec  vous  a  cet  effet,  y  ayant 
mis  toute  notre  confiance  et  que  vous  ne  travaillera  de  Concert 
que  pour  nous  procurer  la  paix  et  la  tranquility  et  ne  cesserons 
de  faire  des  Voeux  au  Ciel  pour  votre  Conservation  et  prosperity. 

Nous  avons  I'honneur  detre 

Monsieur  Vos  tres  humbles  et  devours 
Serviteurs 
Aux  noms  des  Citoyens  du  village  des  Cahoskias  le  onzieme  d' 
Avril  1780 

Antoine  Girardin  F.  trottier 

que  beaulieu. 

mar  +  de  J.  B.  Saucier 

pierre  martain  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix 

Dr.  MSS.,  50J27,  original  manuscript. 


CAHOKIANS  TO  CLARK,  APRIL,  1780  531 

Cahokia  April  28,  1779. 
Addressed,  To  Madame  McCarty,  at  her  mother's,  Montreal. 

Endorsed :  Letter  from  one  Richard  McCarty  at  Cahokia  to 
his  wife  at  Montreal,  dated  the  28th  of  April,  1779.  Received  the 
24th  of  July. 

Inhabitants  of   Cahokia  to  G.  R.  Clark,  April  ii,  1780.^ 
To  the  Honorable  George  Rogers  Clark,  Esquire,  Colonel  and 

Commander  in  Chief  of  the  troops  of  the  State  of  Virginia  in 

the  County  of  the  Illinois  and  its  Dependencies  etc. 
Sir: 

In  the  deplorable  situation  in  which  we  find  ourselves  at  present 
we  are  deputing  to  you  the  person  of  M.  Charles  Gratiot,  one  of 
our  citizens,  to  set  before  you  our  distress  and  the  misery  to 
which  the  savage  nations  from  all  sides  are  reducing  us.  We  are 
on  the  eve  of  being  attacked  in  our  village  by  considerable  parties 
of  savages  and  will  not  be  able  to  work  at  the  cultivation  of  our 
fields,  if  we  do  not  have  prompt  succor.^  That  is  why  we  take 
the  liberty  of  addressing  ourselves  to  you  on  account  of  the  confi- 
dence and  hope  which  we  have  in  your  benevolence  and  affection, 
which  you  have  always  shown  us;  but  what  afflicts  us  the  most 
is  this,  that  in  case  you  send  us  many  men,  we  should  not  have 
the  provisions  which  would  be  necessary  for  them.  M.  Gartiot 
can  easily  inform  you  of  the  capacity  of  our  village  and  we  have 
charged  him  to  confer  with  you  for  this  purpose;  for  we  have  placed 
all  our  confidence  therein  and  that  you  will  only  work  hand  and 
hand  with  us  to  procure  us  peace  and  repose  and  we  will  not  cease 
making  prayers  to  Heaven  for  your  preservation  and  prosperity. 

We  have  the  honor  of  being,  sir,  your  very  humble  and  devoted 
servants.     In  the  name  of  the  citizens  of  Cahokia,  the  eleventh  of 
April,  1780. 
[Signed]  Antoine  Girardin.  F.  Trottier. 

Mark  +  of  Beaulieu. 

Pierre  Martin  J.  B.  Saucier. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

2  The  attack  was  made  on  Cahokia  and  St.  Louis  on  May  26th.  The  British  had  expected 
to  surprise  the  inhabitants  of  the  two  villages.  This  shows  that  they  were  warned  over  a 
month  before  the  attack.  The  most  important  documents  giving  the  history  of  the  attack 
have  been  pubhshed  in  the  Missouri  Hist.  Soc.  Collections,  ii.,  No.  6,  pp.  41  et  seq.  See  also 
this  volume,  p.  539. 


532  ILLINOIS  •HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Petition  of  Cadien  Lausage,  July  6,  1780. 
A  L'Honorable  Cour  du  District  des  Cahoskias 
Messieurs : 

Cadien  Lausage  a  I'honneur  de  vous  representer  tr^s  respec- 
tueusement  qu'ayant  laisse  en  depot  I'autonne  dern^'^  une  Cara- 
bine chez  Veuve  Germain  Jaquet  pour  trois  Cent  livres  de  farrine 
que  le  Suppliant  devoit  a  la  ditte  Dame  etant  sur  son  depart 
pour  les  Pays  d'enhaut  ou  ses  affaires  I'appeloit,  qu'en  outres 
qu'il  avoit  laisse  la  ditte  Carabine  sur  les  pretentions  qu'en  avoit 
forme  le  S^  Ch^  Gratiot  disant  quelle  avoit  ete  prise  a  un  sauvage 
I'autonne  dern^^  et  quil  avoit  ordre  de  la  retirer. 

Mais  quelle  a  ete  sa  surprise  lorsqu'a  son  retour  en  se  village 
il  a  voulu  aller  payer  la  ditte  Dame  Jaquet  et  restirer  la  ditte 
Carabine;  elle  lui  a  dil  quelle  avoit  ete  saisie  par  1' ordre  privee 
de  Mons^  Franc^  Trotie  alors  Juge  de  Police  en  faveur  de  Jos^ 
Alary  pour  une  somme  quil  lui  devoit  le  Suppliant  payable  a 
printems,  et  que  les  dits  Sieurs  Trotie  et  Jos^  Alarry  I'avoit  forcee 
a  livrer  la  ditte  Carabine;  comme  le  Sertificat  de  la  ditte  Dame 
ainsi  que  celui  de  son  frere  le  Prouve. 

Le  Suppliant  a  I'honneur  de  vous  representer  a  cela,  dexsa- 
miner  attentivement  cy  le  Sr.  Fr.  Trotie  etait  en  droit  en  sa  qual- 
ite  de  Juge  de  Police  de  delivrer  une  saisie  de  son  autorit^  privee 
et  sans  celle  de  la  cour,  pour  une  somme  pareille  a  celle  la,  puis- 
que  un  Juge  de  Paix  ne  pent  Juger  au  qu'une  affaire  en  son  par- 
ticulier  passe  la  somme  de  vingt  cinq  sheling  de  la  Province  de  la 
Virginie,  qu'en  outre  la  Suppliant  s'ettant  arrenge  avec  le  Def- 
fendeur  pour  payer  sur  le  Mississipy  la  somme  quil  lui  devoit, 
que  le  deffendeur  devoit  charge  deffun  Pajet  de  ses  Billets  qui 
devoit  en  recevoir  le  payement  lequel  etoit  tout  fort  a  lui  livrer, 
mais  que  le  deffun  Pajet  n'ayant  pas  ete  jus  qu'a  lui  le  Suppliant 
c'est  vu  dans  la  necessity  de  garder  le  dit  payement  et  de  I'apporter 
avec  lui  lequel  il  est  pret  a  faire  au  Deffendeur. 

■  '  Chi.  Hist.  Soc,  Cah.  Rec,  original  manuscript.     Transcription  by  the  editor. 

2Trottier  was  a  member  of  the  Court  at  the  time.  I  do  not  know  whether  the  title  of 
justice  of  the  police  was  given  to  the  justice  holding  the  Court  during  the  week  or  to  each  justice 
of  the  peace.  Later,  one  member  of  the  Court  was  delegated  to  hear  causes  between  the 
sessions  and  was  called  president  of  the  Court  and  justice  of  the  week.     See  supra,  p.  55. 


PETITION  TO  COURT,  JULY,  1780  533 

Petition  of  Cadien  Lausage,  July  6,  1780.^ 
To  the  Honorable  Court  of  the  District  of  Cahokia. 
Sirs : 

Cadien  Lausage  has  the  honor  of  showing  you  very  repect- 
fully  that  he  left  on  deposit  last  autumn  a  rifle  at  the  house  of 
Madame  Germain  Jaquet,  widow,  as  pledge  for  three  hundred 
pounds  of  flour,  which  the  petitioner  owed  the  said  lady,  since  he 
was  about  to  depart  for  the  upper  country,  where  his  business 
called  him;  that,  furthermore,  he  had  left  the  said  rifle  because 
of  the  claims  which  M.  Charles  Gratiot  had  made  to  it,  affirming 
that  it  had  been  taken  from  a  savage  last  autumn  and  that  he  had 
an  order  to  take  possession  of  it. 

But  what  was  his  surprise,  when,  on  his  return  to  this  village, 
he  wished  to  go  and  pay  the  said  Madame  Jaquet  and  repossess 
himself  of  the  said  rifle,  she  told  him  that  it  had  been  seized  on  the 
private  order  of  M.  Francois  Trottier,  at  that  time  judge  of  police,^ 
in  favor  of  Joseph  Alarie  for  a  sum  which  he,  the  petitioner,  owed 
him,  payable  in  the  spring;  and  that  the  said  MM.  Trottier  and 
Joseph  Alarie  had  compelled  her  to  deliver  up  the  said  rifle,  as  the 
certificate  of  the  said  lady  and  that  of  her  brother  prove. 

The  petitioner  has  the  honor  to  request  this  of  you,  to  examine 
carefully,  if  M.  Fr.  Trottier  was  within  his  rights  in  issuing,  in  his 
capacity  as  judge  of  the  police,  on  his  private  authority  and  with- 
out that  of  the  Court,  a  writ  of  seizure  for  a  sum  like  that,  since  a 
justice  of  the  peace  of  the  province  of  Virginia  by  himself  cannot 
pass  judgment  in  a  suit  for  more  than  twenty-five  shillings;  and 
to  notice,  also,  that  the  petitioner  had  arranged  with  the  defend- 
ant to  pay  the  sum,  which  he  owes  him,  on  the  Mississippi ;  that 
the  defendant  was  to  have  intrusted  the  deceased  Pajet  with  his 
notes,  who  was  to  receive  the  payment  for  them  and  which  was 
all  ready  for  delivery  to  him;  but  that,  the  deceased  Pajet  not 
having  come,  the  petitioner  saw  himself  under  the  necessity  of 
keeping  the  said  payment  and  of  carrying  it  with  him,  and  this 
he  is  ready  to  make  to  the  defendant. 

In  consideration  of  this,  sirs,  that,  since  MM.  Joseph  Alarie  and 
Fr.  Trottier  have  by  their  private  authority,  and  not  by  that  of 


534  ILLINOIS  toSTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Ce  Considere  Messieurs  quil  vous  plaise  ordonner  que  puisque 
les  S"  Jos^  Alary  et  F"  Troti^  se  sont  cy  injustement  saisie  de 
leurs  autorite  privee  et  sans  celle  de  la  Justice  et  que  le  S^  Jos^ 
Alary  s'en  soit  servy  comme  il  a  fait,  de  vouloir  les  condamner 
a  payer  la  ditte  Carabine  Cent  Piastres  gourdes  qui  est  le  prix 
quelle  a  coute  et  les  condamner  a  tous  fraix  depend,  Dommages 
&c:  tant  de  la  procedure  que  dailleur  et  feres  Droit. 

aux  Cahos  le  6  Juillet  1780  Pr.  Cadien  Lausage    Ch  Gratiot 
Inhabitants  of  Cahokia  to  De  La  Balme,  Sept.  21,  1780. 

Declaration  au  nom  des  Habitants  du  Village  de  Cahokias 
aux  Islinois  addressee  au  Mons.  Motin  de  la  Balme  pensionnaire 
du  Roi  de  france  et  Colonel  fran^ois  &ca  &c  &ce 
Monsieur 

Nous  soussignes  Habitants  des  Cahokias  tres  persuadd  de 
1 'elevation  de  vos  sentiments  pour  nous  joint  a  cela  le  Haut  rang 
que  vous  tenez  dans  le  monde  dont  nous  ne  pouvons  plus  douter, 
et  plus  encor  les  lustre  nom  de  frangois  que  vous  porte  et  dont 
vous  vous  faites  honneur  seul  nom  pour  lequel  nous  ne  cessons 
de  soupirer  de  peur  qu'il  ne  s'etaigne  chez  nous  et  pour  lequel 
meme  nous  avons  toujours  et^  et  sommes  encore  prets  a  sacrifier 
non  pas  nos  biens  seuls  qui  ne  sont  que  par  trop  mediocres,  mais 
nos  propres  viese 

Ces  motiffes  de  Consolation  et  d'autres  non  moins  legitimes 
nous  commande  imperieusement  d'avoire  en  votre  personne  une 
si  grande  Confiance  que  nous  vous  prions  unanimement  de  vou- 
loir bien  Ecouter  d'une  oreille  favorable  la  declaraton  que  nous 
osons  vous  presenter  touchant  tous  les  mauvais  traitements  que 
nous  avons  souffert  patiemmement  depuis  que  les  troupes  de 
Virginie  sont  malheureusement  arrive  chez  nous  jusqu'a  present. 

Non  que  nous  veuillons  entreprendre  de  vous  ennuyer  de  pla- 
intes  innutiles  qui  ne  serviroient  a  rien  pour  nous  delivrer  d'une 
insuportable  tirannie,  n'y  meme  a  nous  avancer  un  bonheur 
plus  durable  a  la  Venire,  et  que  nous  esperons  bientot.  C'est 
pourquoy  nous  ne  voulons  que  rapporter  de  la  maniere  la  plus 

^  Can.  Archives,  B.,  184  vol.  2,  p.  447,  from  copy. 

^  For  an  account  of  the  expedition  of  De  la  Balme,  see  Introduction,  pp.  Ixxxix.  et  seq. 


MEMORIAL,  SEPTEMBER,  1780  535 

justice,  seized  the  rifle  so  unjustly  and  since  M.  Joseph  Alarie  has 
made  the  use  thereof  that  he  has,  it  please  you  to  condemn  them 
to  pay  for  the  said  rifle  one  hundred  piastres  gourdes,  which  is  the 
price  that  it  has  cost,  and  to  condemn  them  to  pay  all  costs, 
charges,  damages  etc  as  well  for  the  procedure  as  otherwise  and 
you  will  render  justice. 

At  Cahokia  July  6,  1780.     For  Cadien  Lausage 

Charles  Gratiot. 
Inhabitants  of  Cahokia  to  De  la  Balme,  September  21, 

1780.1 

Declaration  in  the  name  of  the  inhabitants  of  the  village  of 
Cahokia  in  the  Illinois,  sent  to  M.  Mottin  de  la  Balme,  pensioner 
of  the  King  of  France  and  French  Colonel  etc. 
Sir:— 

We,  the  undersigned  inhabitants  of  Cahokia,  are  well  per- 
suaded of  the  loftiness  of  your  sentiments  for  us  and  of  the  high 
rank  which  you  hold  in  the  world,  concerning  which  we  can  no 
longer  doubt,  and  still  more  of  the  illustrious  name  of  Frenchman 
which  you  bear  and  honor,  the  only  name  for  which  we  do  not 
cease  to  sigh  for  fear  that  it  be  extinguished  among  us  and  for 
which  we  have  always  been  and  are  still  ready  to  sacrifice  not  only 
our  property,  which  is  only  too  small,  but  our  own  lives. ^ 

These  causes  for  consolation  and  for  others  not  less  legiti- 
mate command  us  imperiously  to  have  so  great  confidence  in  your 
person  that  we  unanimously  pray  you  to  consent  to  listen  with 
favorable  ear  to  the  declaration,  which  we  dare  to  present  to  you, 
concerning  all  the  bad  treatment  which  we  have  patiently  suffered, 
since  the  troops  of  Virginia  unfortunately  arrived  in  our  midst 
until  the  present  moment. 

We  do  not  desire  to  attempt  wearying  you  with  useless  com- 
plaints, which  would  serve  in  no  way  to  free  us  from  an  insupport- 
able tyranny  nor  further  for  us  a  happiness  more  durable  in  the 
future  and  which  we  hope  for  soon.  That  is  why  we  wish  only  to 
relate  in  the  most  simple  and  faithful  manner  the  most  true  things, 
which  they  (the  Virginians)  themselves  are  incapable  of  calling  in 
question. 


536  ILLINOIS  ^HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

simple  et  la  plus  fidelle  les  choses  les  plus  veritable  sur  les  quelles 
ils  sont  eux  memes  incapable  de  contester. 

Ou  les  troupes  Virginiennes  etant  arrives  au  Kaskaskias  il 
y  a  deux  ans  passes  commandes  par  le  Colonel  S^  George  Rogers 
Klark,  ils  se  sont  saisi  de  la  personne  de  Monsieur  de  Rocheblave 
sans  que  les  habitants  du  dit  village  se  soient  mis  en  devoire 
de  leur  faire  aucunes  resistance,  vu  qu'ils  se  declarerent  for- 
mellement  amateurs  de  la  liberty  pour  laquelle  ils  ne  cessoient 
de  se  battre  et  encore  plus  constemment  fidelles  allies  de  la  France 
leur  plus  grande  protectrice.  II  ne  leurs  fut  done  pas  possible 
de  faire  le  moindre  signe  de  vioUence  au  seul  nom  des  francois 
un  fois  prononce  devant  eux. 

Ces  Habitans  enfin  peu  attentifs  a  leur  propre  bonheur  et 
n'ayant  point  eux  memes  assez  d'esperience  pour  decouvrir  leur 
fourberie  cachee,  Sous  de  fausse  apparence  d'honetes  gens  n'y 
point  prevenir  les  facheuses  suittes  qui  les  menacoient  ainsy  que 
nous  et  qui  nont  pas  manquer  de  s'effectuer  en  effet  se  sont 
rendues  avec  la  plus  grande  credulite  sans  meme  exiger  de  voire 
aucuns  Titres  qui  puissent  nullement  les  eclaircire  ny  leur  prouver 
par  quelle  autorite  le  Col.  Clark  s'emparoit  de  leur  village; 
s'aveuglant  eux  memes  du  doux  espoir  de  se  revoir  en  bien  peu 
de  temps  les  tres  humble  et  fideles  sujets  de  leur  ancien  et  tres 
puissant  monarque  le  roix  de  France. 

Nous  avons  lieu  da  croire  que  les  Virginiens  voyant  la  trop 
grande  Credulite  des  Habitants  des  Kaskaskias  et  trouvant  en  un 
mot  combien  il  leur  etoit  facille  de  faire  le  conquete  d'un  pays 
habite  par  des  gens  si  creduUe  et  si  aise  a  gouverner  ont  sans 
doutte  crus  a  propos  de  depecher  promptement  le  Capitaine 
Jos^  Bowman  pour  venir  s'emparer  de  notre  Village,  n'ayant 
uniquement  que  trente  hommes  avec  eux  et  sans  estre  soutenu 
d'aucuns  titres  reconnus  ny  des  Etats  unis  ny  meme  de  I'Etat  de 
Virginie,  ou  s'il  en  avoit  s'est  epargne  la  pene  de  nous  les  faire 
voir,  ou  craignant  quelques  facheuses  suittes  les  voyant  nos 
voisins  et  meme  maitres  des  Kaskaskias  avons  proferer  de  nous 
rendre  plutot  que  des  nous  exposer  a  de  plus  grandes  risques  joint 
a  cela  les  promesses  rdcidiv^es  qu'ils  nous  faisoient  incessamment 


MEMORIAL,  SEPTEMBER,  1780  537 

When  the  Virginia  troops  arrived  in  Kaskaskia  two  years  ago, 
commanded  by  Colonel  George  Rogers  Clark,  they  captured  the 
person  of  M.  de  Rocheblave  without  the  inhabitants  of  said 
village  attempting  the  duty  of  making  any  resistance  to  them; 
because  they  explicitly  declared  themselves  lovers  of  liberty  for 
which  they  fought  incessantly,  and  still  more  constantly  as  faithful 
allies  of  the  French,  their  greatest  protector.  It  was  not,  then, 
possible  for  the  Kaskaskians  to  make  the  least  sign  of  violence 
to  the  name  of  Frenchmen  once  pronounced  before  them. 

These  inhabitants,  finally,  little  attentive  to  their  own  hap- 
piness and  not  sufficiently  experienced  to  discover  the  con- 
cealed knavery  of  the  Virginians  under  the  false  appearance  of 
honest  people  or  to  anticipate  the  grievous  consequences  which 
menaced  them  as  well  as  us,  and  which  have  not  failed  to  take 
effect,  have  surrendered  themselves  with  the  greatest  credulity, 
without  even  exacting  a  sight  of  any  credentials  which  might 
enlighten  them  in  any  way  or  prove  to  them  by  what  authority 
Colonel  Clark  took  possession  of  their  village,  for  they  blinded 
themselves  with  the  sweet  hope  of  seeing  themselves  again  in  a 
short  time  the  very  humble  and  faithful  subjects  of  their  former 
and  very  powerful  monarch,  the  king  of  France. 

We  have  reason  to  believe  that  the  Virginians,  after  seeing  the 
very  great  credulity  of  the  inhabitants  of  Kaskaskia  and  finding, 
in  short,  how  easily  it  was  for  them  to  ijaake  the  conquest  of  a 
country  inhabited  by  people  so  credulous  and  so  easy  to  govern, 
have  undoubtedly  believed  it  expedient  to  despatch  immediately 
Captain  Joseph  Bowman  to  come  and  take  possession  of  our  vil- 
lage. He  had  only  thirty  men  with  him  and  was  unsupported  by 
any  recognized  credentials  either  from  the  United  States  or  even 
from  the  State  of  Virginia  or,  if  he  had  them,  he  saved  himself  the 
trouble  of  showing  them  to  us.  And  we,  fearing  some  grievous 
consequences  in  seeing  them  our  neighbors  and  even  masters  of 
Kaskaskia,  have  preferred  to  surrender  rather  than  expose  our- 
selves to  greater  risks.  There  should  be  added  to  this  the  repeated 
promises,  which  they  continually  made  us,  of  enjoying  the  sweets 
of  liberty  and  its  advantages  and  the  declaration  to  us,  under  oath 


538  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

de  jouire  de  douceurs  de  la  liberty  et  de  ses  avantages,  et  nous 
affirment  par  serment  meme  que  la  guerre  entre  rammerique  et 
la  grande  Bretagne  ne  pouvoit  pas  durer  plus  qu'une  ann^e  vue 
que  la  voix  seppuisoient  to  us  les  jours  et  ne  tiroit  aucune  force 
generallement  que  ce  peut  etre  d'ailleurs,  enfin  les  protestations 
reiteres  detre  toujours  sincere  et  allies  fidelles  et  plus  encore 
I'esperance  de  nous  voire  un  pour  assujetie  au  joug  leger  de  la 
France.  Nous  ont  contraint  a  les  recevoir  chez  nous  comme  amis 
croyant  bien  qu'ils  etoient  authorise  du  Congie  Meme  et  non  pas 
qu'ils  formoient  un  Etat  particulier  entre  eux. 

Nous  voyant  alors  epuises  et  reduits  a  souffrir  les  fleaux  d'une 
guere  contre  les  sujets  de  la  grande  Bretagne  dont  la  cause  et 
principal  point  ne  nous  venoit  que  par  apart  aux  Virginiens  qui 
nous  avoit  conquis.  Nous  avons  crus  necessaire  d'en  prevenir  le 
Colonel  Clark  qui  etablissoit  pour  lors  la  minne  de  faire  ou  il  avoit 
ammene  quantite  de  famille  et  Beaucoup  de  Trouppes. 

Mais  ce  dernier  il  faut  croire  se  voyant  a  charge  tant  de  monde 
sans  vivres,  nat  point  beaucoup  hesite  de  nous  envoyer  pres  de  deux 
cent  hommes,  aux  quels  il  s'est  joint  affectant  sous  les  apparences 
d'un  feau  zele  le  plaisir  qu'il  avoit  de  nous  estre  de  quelqu'utilit^. 
Quelques  jours  apres  son  arrivee  icy  I'armee  de  nos  ennemis 
compose  d'un  assez  nombreuse  quantite  de  Sauvages  cy  devant 
nos  fidelles  amis,  et  fort  peu  d'englois  etant  debarque  partie  sur 
notre  rive  et  le  reste  sur  les  terre  espagnoUes  s'est  retires  s'etant 
borne  a  quelques  tis-tis  a  leur  lache  maniere  de  faire  la  guere  sans 
faire  un  grand  Carnage  dans  notre  partie. 

1  This  may  be  the  meaning,  but  the  passage  is  very  obscure. 

2  This  statement  is  probably  true,  for  an  attack  on  lUinois  by  the  states  had  been 
expected  before  the  appearance  of  Clark.     See  Introduction,  p.  xxxv. 

3  The  chronology  from  this  point  on  is  difl&cult  to  understand.  If  it  is  assumed  that  the 
narrative  follows  the  chronological  order,  as  from  the  connectives  it  appears  to  do,  this  attack 
on  St.  Louis  and  Cahokia  occurred  in  the  fall  of  1778,  the  retaliation  on  the  Indians  imme- 
diately afterwards,  and  after  that  the  troops  were  left  in  Cahokia,  where  they  still  were  in  1780. 
All  this  is  impossible,  for  Great  Britain  was  not  at  war  with  Spain,  Montgomery  had  returned 
to  Virginia,  and  the  troops  were  not  in  Cahokia  all  the  time  from  1778  to  1780,  as  the  docu- 
ment itself  later  shows.     Therefore,  the  narrative  as  it  stands  is  not  chronological. 

If  we  suppose  that  the  writers  set  down  each  grievance  as  it  came  to  their  minds,  new 
difficulties  arise.  The  transition  to  this  passage  is  too  abrupt.  On  page  543  the  writers  men- 
tion Captain  McCarty  and  add,  "of  whom  we  have  spoken  before,"  although  it  is  the  first 
time  his  name  appears.  On  page  549,  near  the  end  of  the  memorial,  the  writers  declare  that 
they  will  now  narrate  a  detailed  account  of  the  treatment  they  have  received  from  the 
Virginians,  and  begin  with  number  i;   but  that  detailed  account  had  already  been  given. 

From  these  chronological  and  other  inconsistencies,  it  is  evident  that  the  pages  of  the 
original  memorial  had  become  misplaced  before  any  copy  of  them  was  made,  and  subsequent 


MEMORIAL,  SEPTEMBER,  1780  539 

even,  that  the  war  between  America  and  Great  Britain  could 
not  last  longer  than  a  year,  seeing  that  public  opinion  was  being 
wearied  every  day  and  that  no  conclusion  was  generally  drawn 
that  it  would  be  otherwise;^  and  finally  the  reiterated  protesta- 
tions that  they  were  always  sincere  and  allied  friends ;  and  further- 
more the  hope  of  seeing  ourselves  again  subjected  to  the  light 
yoke  of  France.  Therefore  we  were  constrained  to  receive  them 
among  us  as  friends,  believing  indeed  that  they  were  authorized 
by  Congress  itself  and  not  that  they  represented  a  particular 
state. 2 

Seeing  ourselves  exhausted  and  reduced  to  sufifer  the  scourge 
of  a  war  against  the  subjects  of  Great  Britain,  the  cause  and  prin- 
cipal point  of  which  reached  us  only  from  the  side  of  the' Virgin- 
ians who  had  conquered  us,  we  have  believed  it  necessary  to  in- 
form Colonel  Clark  thereof,  who  was  establishing  at  that  time 
the  Iron  Banks  where  he  had  brought  numerous  families  and 
many  troops.^ 

But  this  latter,  it  must  be  believed,  seeing  himself  in  charge 
of  so  great  a  number  without  supplies,  has  not  hesitated  long 
to  send  us  almost  two  hundred  men,  to  whom  he  joined  himself, 
affecting  under  the  appearance  of  a  false  zeal,  the  pleasure  which 
he  had  in  being  of  some  utility  to  us. 

Some  days  after  his  arrival  here,  the  army  of  our  enemy,  com- 
posed of  a  sufficiently  large  number  of  savages,  herebefore  our 
faithful  friends,  and  of  very  few  English,  having  disembarked, 

copies  have  perpetuated  the  eiTor.  That  this  is  true  may  be  easily  proved  by  transposing  this 
passage,  including  the  paragraphs  through  the  one  beginning  with  "On  the  return  from  this 
last  ill  success",  with  the  passage  on  page  547  beginning  with  "We  believed  also  that  there", 
and  including  the  paragraphs  through  the  one  wliich  begins  with  "A  heifer,  about  two  years 
old",  when  all  difficulties  of  chronology  and  interpretation  disappear. 

Such  memorials  as  these,  of  which  I  have  seen  several,  were  v/ritten  on  folios  placed 
together,  but  unsewed,  and  folded  once.  In  this  case  there  must  have  been  four  folios,  making, 
when  folded,  sixteen  pages.  The  first  four  pages  were  in  correct  order  when  copied,  but  with 
the  paragraphs  which  would  fall  on  the  pages  5  and  6  the  difficulties  begin;  then  there  fol- 
low four  pages  of  narrative  without  inconsistencies,  and  on  what  would  be  pages  11  and  12 
further  difficulties  occur.  These  pages  of  the  memorial,  i.  e.,  5,  6,  11,  and  12,  were  written  on 
the  same  folio.  V/hat  has  happened  is  this:  one  of  the  first  readers  of  the  memorial  has 
folded  the  folio  backwards,  so  that  pages  11  and  12  replaced  pages  5  and  6.  This  was  not 
noticed  by  the  copyist,  because  the  pages  of  the  memorial  were  not  numbered  and  because 
each  sheet  began  and  ended  with  a  paragraph. 

With  this  change,  the  paragraph  under  consideration  is  easily  explained.  The  "en" 
refers  to  the  expected  attack  by  the  British  and  Indians  in  1780;  the  ''mine  de  faire"  should 
read  mine  de  fer,  which  means  the  Iron  Banks  south  of  the  mouth  of  the  Ohio,  where  Clark 
was  building  Fort  Jefferson.  See  letter  from  the  Cahokians  to  Clark,  asking  for  his 
assistance,  p.  531. 


540  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Oh!  le  CoL  Clark  affectant  toujours  de  vouloir  notre  bien  pub- 
lique  sous  pret  ex  de  nous  Vanger  forma  aussitot  avec  nous  et 
conjointement  aux  Espagnoles  un  partis  de  plus  trois  cents 
hommes  pour  aller  ravager  dans  leur  propre  village  les  Sauvages 
qui  etoient  venus  nous  harceller  chez  nous  ayant  substitue  en  Sa 
place  Col.  Montgommery  pour  nous  commander  et  aussitost  il 
nous  a  laiss^. 

II  est  done  bon  Monsieur  de  vous  exposer  que  les  Virginiens 
n'ayant  jamais  eu  aucunne  principe  d'economie  ont  ^te  cause  par 
leur  peu  d'arrangement  et  mauvaise  conduitte  na  point  reussi  et 
que  notre  glorieux  pro  jets  se  sons  trouves  par  leur  faute  evannoui^, 
les  Sauvages  ayant  abandonn^  leurs  Villages  les  plus  proches  ou 
nous  avons  ete  nous  nous  sommes  vus  force  a  relacher  et  ne  pas 
pousser  routte  plus  loin  n'ayant  plus  presque  de  vivres  ny  de  poudre 
ny  balle  ce  qu'ils  s'etoient  charge  de  nous  fournir  eux  memes. 
I'un  des  plus  grand  sujet  pour  lequel  se  plaignent  tous  les  jeunes 
gens  qui  ne  veulent  plus  entendre  parler  de  les  suivres  en  quelques 
lieux  que  se  puisse  etre. 

,  Au  retour  de  cette  derniere  Cacade  le  Colonel  Montgommery 
nous  a  propose  de  garder  les  troupes  que  nous  souhaitterons  pour 
la  surete  de  notre  Village,  deignez  aussi  rappeller  que  nous  ne 
croyons  point  qu'il  nous  faisoit  cette  offre  par  un  Veritable  effet 
de  son  zele  qu'il  nous  vouloit  montrer  mais  parcequ'il  s'en  voyoit  luy 
meme  embarasse.  nous  avons  cru  necessaire  de  garder  avec  nous 
cent  hommes  que  nous  nous  sommes  oblige  de  nourir  chez  nous 
et  comme  nous  meme  lesquels  sont  encore  chez  nous  les  uns 
malades  et  les  autres  en  santees  qui  ne  nous  sont  qu'a  charge  et 
qui  dans  un  tems  aussi  critique  que  celuy  ou  nous  sommes  a  present 
ne  daigne  point  seulement  faire  la  moindre  guarde  puisqu'ils  man- 
quent  done  totallement  leurs  engagements  nous  ne  nous  croyons 
plus  oblige  au  soutiens  d'un  Trouppe  qui  nous  infecte  et  nous 
ruine  en  ne  nous  payant  point  ce  que  nous  leurs  avons  jusqu'a  ce 
jour  avance  qu'avec  un  monnoye  dont  nous  ne  pouvons  rien 

*  Expedition  to  the  Rock  River  vinder  the  command  of  Montgomery,  while  Clark  hurried 
south  to  intercept  another  army  of  the  enemy  on  its  way  to  Kentucky. — Va.  State  Papers,  iii, 
441.  Captain  Rogers  also  says  that  the  Spaniards  joined  Montgomery  for  the  expedition  to 
the  Rock  liver.— Dr.  MSS.,  28 J3. 


MEMORIAL,  SEPTEMBER,  1780  541 

part  on  our  bank  and  the  remainder  on  Spanish  land,  withdrew, 
having  limited  themselves  to  some  "  tis-tis'^  in  their  slack  man- 
ner of  making  war  without  causing  a  great  carnage  in  our 
country. 

Oh!  Colonel  Clark,  affecting  always  to  desire  our  public  wel- 
fare and  under  pretext  of  avenging  us,  soon  formed  with  us  and 
conjointly  with  the  Spaniards  a  party  of  more  than  three  hundred 
men  to  go  and  attack  in  their  own  village  the  savages  who  had 
come  to  our  homes  to  harass  us,  and  after  substituting  Colonel 
Montgomery  to  command  us  in  his  place,  he  soon  left  us. 

It  is,  then,  well  to  explain  to  you,  sir,  that  the  Virginians,  who 
never  employed  any  principle  of  economy,  have  been  the  cause, 
by  their  lack  of  management  and  bad  conduct,  of  the  non-success 
of  the  expedition  and  that  our  glorious  projects  have  failed 
through  their  fault;  for  the  savages  abandoned  their  nearest  vil- 
lages, where  we  have  been,  and  we  were  forced  to  stop  and  not 
push  on  further,  since  we  had  almost  no  more  provisions,  powder 
and  balls,  which  the  Virginians  had  undertaken  to  furnish  us.^ 
This  is  one  of  the  greatest  subjects  about  which  all  the  young 
men  complain  and  they  no  longer  wish  to  hear  talk  of  following 
the  Virginians  to  any  place  whatsoever. 

On  the  return  from  this  last  ill  success,  Colonel  Montgomery 
proposed  that  we  keep  the  troops  which  we  wished  for  the  safety 
of  our  village.  Deign  also  to  recall  that  we  do  not  believe  that  he 
made  this  offer  from  a  true  effect  of  his  zeal,  which  he  wished 
to  show  us;  but  because  he  saw  himself  embarassed.  We  be- 
lieved it  necessary  to  keep  with  us  a  hundred  men,  whom  we  are 
obliged  to  support  at  our  homes,  and  like  ourselves  they  are  still 
with  us,  some  sick  and  others  v/ell;  and  they  are  only  a  charge  to 
us  and  at  a  time  so  critical  as  this  present,  they  do  not  deign  to 
do  the  least  guard  duty.  Since,  therefore,  they  fail  totally  in 
their  engagements,  we  do  not  believe  ourselves  bound  to  the  sup- 
port of  a  body  of  troops,  that  infect  and  ruin  us  by  not  paying 
for  what  we  have  up  to  this  day  advanced  to  them  except  with 
a  money  with  which  we  can  buy  nothing;  for  property  infinitely 
more  considerable  than  ours  would  be  weakened  very  quickly  and 


542  ILLINOIS  •HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

avoire  des  biens  infiniement  plus  considerable  que  les  notre, 
s'alterroient  bien  vitre  et  s'eppuiseroient  enfin  si  comme  nous  ils 
s'avanceroient  toujours  et  ne  recevoient  rien. 

Joint  a  cela  encor  nous  avons  I'honneur  de  vous  observer  qu'il 
est  arrive  ici  dernierement  que  le  Capitaine  Hallars  logant  dans  ce 
village,  s'est  adonner  a  entrer  dans  la  maison  d'un  Habitant  de  ce 
Village,  ou  etoit  loge  un  Soldat  de  sa  compagnie  lequel  s'est  plaint 
dela  mauvaise  nourriture  bien  qu'il  fut  a  la  table  de  son  haute 
homme  charge  d'une  nombreuse  famille,  et  qui  n'a  qu'un 
bien  tres  mediocre  enfin  le  Capitaine  prenant  un  ton  imperieux 
dit  qu'il  pretendoit  que  les  soldats  fussent  bien  traitte  et  qu'il 
lui  ordonnoit  de  tuer  ses  poulles  jusqu'a  la  derniere,  et  qu'apres 
il  le  forcheroient  d'acheter  ailleurs  a  prix  d'argent  n'ayant  pas 
lui  meme  assez  de  raison  ou  n'en  vouloit  point  avoire  ny  croire 
qu'il  ne  tendoient  tous  qu'a  la  ruine  et  insuportable  captivite  de 
tons  les  Habitants. 

En  outre  le  major  Rich*^  Mc  Carty  dont  nous  avons  deja  parle 
mecontent  disoit  il  du  mauvais  procede  des  Habitants  a  leurs 
egards;  auroit  souhaitter  Commander  en  chef  ce  village  afin  de 
faire  prendre  une  partie  des  principaux  Habitants  dicy  pour  les 
mettre  au  fers  et  les  envoyer  ainsy  gainer  dans  la  Virginie  n'etant 
pas  encor  rapase  de  la  vaine  et  trop  grande  credulite  avec  laquelle 
il  nous  ont  jusqu'icy  abus^. 

II  nous  plaira  aussy  croire  que  dernierement  Major  William 
ayant  envoye  chez  Monsieur  gagne  habitant  de  ce  lieux  un  soldat 
avec  un  ordre  pour  y  loger.  Cet  homme  qui  depuis  un  assez  long 
espace  de  temps  avoit  eu  I'importunite  jusqu'au  nombre  de  quatre 
a  la  fois  et  qui  en  avoit  encor  un  dans  le-meme  moment  ne  se  croy- 
ant  point  oblige  de  prendre  ce  dernier  par  plusieurs  fois  re- 
cidivez  le  renvoye  parrer  son  ordre  refusant  constemment  de  le 
recevoire  Le  Major  William  meme  s'emportant  en  une  furieuse 
CoUer  s'est  munis  de  deux  bon  pistolets  avec  resolution  de  le  luy 
faire  revoire  son  soldat  par  la  force,  en  ayant  rencontre  en  chemin 
ledit  gagne  il  luy  a  applique  un  de  ses  pistolets  sous  la  gorge  le 
menafant  bien  fort  de  luy  flamber  le  tette  s'il  ne  vouloit  incon- 
tinent obeir  a  son  ordre  et  loger  son  soldat. 


MEMORIAL,  SEPTEMBER,  1780  543 

finally  exhausted,  if  like  us,  the  owners  were  always  making  ad- 
vances and  receiving  nothing  in  return. 

Joined  to  this  also,  we  have  the  honor  to  inform  you  of  ".-hat 
happened  here  recently.  Captain  Hallars  [Kellar?]  happened 
to  enter  into  the  house  of  an  inhabitant  of  this  village  where  was 
lodged  a  soldier  of  his  company,  who  complained  of  the  bad  food, 
although  he  was  at  the  table  of  a  host  intrusted  with  a  numerous 
family  who  has  only  a  very  small  property.  Finally  the  captain, 
assuming  an  imperious  tone,  said  that  he  meant  that  the  soldiers 
should  be  well  treated  and  he  ordered  the  man  to  kill  his 
fowls  up  to  the  last  one,  and  afterwards  compelled  him  to  buy 
elsewhere  at  the  money  price,  because  he  did  not  have  or  did 
not  wish  to  have  sufficient  reason  for  believing  that  they 
were  reducing  to  ruin  and  insupportable  captivity  all  the  inhabi- 
tants. 

Furthermore,  Major  Richard  McCarty,  of  whom  we  have 
already  spoken,  discontented,  he  said,  with  the  bad  behavior 
of  the  inhabitants  towards  them,  had  wished  to  be  chief  com- 
mander of  this  village  in  order  to  have  arrested  a  part  of  the 
principal  inhabitants  thereof  so  that  he  might  put  them  in  irons 
and  send  them,  thus  caught,  to  Virginia,  since  he  is  not  satiated 
with  the  vain  and  too  great  credulity  by  means  of  which  they 
have  until  now  deceived  us. 

It  will  please  you  also  to  consider  that  lately  Major  William 
sent  to  the  house  of  M.  Gagne,  an  inhabitant  of  this  place,  a 
soldier  with  an  order  to  lodge  there.  This  man,  who  for  a  suffi- 
ciently long  time  had  had  the  vexation  of  as  many  as  four  at  a  time 
and  who  had  one  of  them  still  at  the  very  time,  did  not  believe 
himself  obliged  to  take  this  last,  and  several  times  sent  him  back 
to  get  rid  of  his  order,  and  refused  constantly  to  receive  him. 
Major  William  himself,  flying  into  a  furious  passion,  armed 
himself  with  two  good  pistols  in  the  determination  to  force  him 
to  receive  his  soldier;  and  having  met  on  the  way  the  said  Gagn^, 
he  placed  one  of  his  pistols  at  his  neck  and  threatened  fiercely 
to  blow  off  his  head,  if  he  did  not  agree  immediately  to  obey  his 
order  and  lodge  his  soldier. 


544  ILLINOIS  mSTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Dernierement  aussi  le  meme  Major  William  ayant  envoyd 
chez  un  nomm^  lefebre  forgeron  pour  emprunter  quelques  Bouteil- 
les  de  taffia  Ce  dernier  luy  a  fait  repondre  que  n'etant  point  maitre 
puisqu'il  le  debitoit  pour  un  autre  qui  le  payoit  poiu:  ses  peinnes 
il  ne  luy  etoit  point  possible  de  prendre  sur  luy  et  qu'il  dtoit  pret 
a  luy  en  ceder  cent  pots  s'il  le  souhaittoit  moyennant  qu'il  donne- 
roit  de  1 'argent  comptant  aussitot  et  sans  attendre  d'avantage  le 
Major  envoya  un  officier  ou  sergent  accompagne  par  six  soldats 
avec  ordre  de  saisir  tous  les  taffias  que  le  dit  lefevre  pouvoit  avoire 
et  ce  sans  doutte  au  profit  des  Etats  de  Virginie,  mais  ce  dernier 
leur  ayant  montre  le  lieux  ou  ses  Brissons  etoient  referme  ils 
n'ont  point  os^  faire  fraction  et  en  a  et^  aquitte  au  moyen  d'un 
cruche  qu'il  a  ete  oblige  de  leurs  donner. 

Pour  mieux  vous  faire  Connoitre  le  peu  d'indulgence  qu'ils 
avoient  pour  nous  le  peu  de  soins  qu'ils  prennoient  de  s'attirer  nos 
coeurs  et  meme  davantage  leur  impitoyable  genre  de  gouverner 
un  peuple  sur  lequel  ils  voyoient  avoire  pris  trop  d'avantage,  ils 
sont  exige  de  expressement  et  nous  ont  force  de  leur  fournir  une 
quantite  considerable  de  farinne  pour  mettre  en  Magazin  et  pour 
les  Besoins  de  I'Etat,  Voulant  disoient  ils  faire  une  expedition  pour 
notre  salut  generalle  sans  nous  dire  formellement  ny  ou  ils  vouloient 
aller  ny  ce  qu'ils  vouloient  faire. 

oh!  comme  nous  n'avons  pas  tout  a  fait  paru  dispose  a  consentir 
trop  aveuglement  a  leur  requisition  ils  ont  des  ce  moment  voulu 
opprimer  la  force  par  la  force,  et  Sans  plus  tarder  au  envoya  un  de 
leurs  officiers  un  sergent  suivie  de  quelques  soldats  pour  faire  la 
visite  dans  tous  les  moulins  de  ce  village  afin  de  combiner  par  eux 
memes  selon  les  farennes  qu'ils  y  trouveroient  Et  qu'ils  en  pour- 
roient  prendre  pour  eux  cette  guarde  conduitte  par  leurs  mauvais 
princippes  ont  ose  forcer  les  portes  qui  se  sont  trouve  ferme 
menacent  meme  de  donner  de  leurs  Carabines  ceux  qui  seroient 
assez  hardis  de  s'opposer  a  leur  infame  violence  osait  de  plus 
imprimer  Sur  les  portes  de  chaque  moulin  I'etampe  de  I'Etat  de 
Virginie  comme  luy  appartenant.    Entre  ceux  qui  ont  des  moulins 

1  After  the  return  from  the  Rock  River  expedition  Major  Williams  was  left  in  command 
of  the  troops  at  Cahokia,  superseding  McCarty. — English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  ii.,  790. 


MEMORIAL,  SEPTEMBER,  1780  545 

Lately  also,  the  same  Major  William,^  having  sent  to  the  house 
of  a  man  named  Lefevre,  blacksmith,  to  borrow  some  bottles  of 
tafia,  this  latter  answered  that  he  was  not  the  owner,  since  he 
sold  them  at  retail  for  another  who  paid  him  for  his  trouble,  and 
that  it  was  not  possible  to  assume  the  responsibility  and  that  he 
was  ready  to  give  him  a  hundred  jugs  thereof,  if  he  wished  to  pay 
cash.  Immediately  and  without  waiting  longer,  the  major  sent  an 
officer  or  sergent  accompanied  by  six  soldiers  with  an  order  to 
seize  all  the  tafia  which  the  said  Lefevre  might  have;  and  this 
without  doubt  to  the  profit  of  the  estates  of  Virginia;  but  after 
this  last  had  shown  the  place  where  his  liquor  was  locked  up, 
they  did  not  dare  to  break  in  and  he  has  been  freed  from  them 
by  paying  a  jugfull  which  he  was  obliged  to  give  them. 

In  order  that  you  may  better  understand  the  little  indulgence 
which  they  have  for  us  and  the  little  care  they  take  to  win  our 
affections  and  even  more  their  pitiless  manner  of  governing  a 
people,  over  whom  they  see  they  have  taken  such  an  advantage, 
we  tell  you  that  they  exacted  expressly,  and  have  compelled  us 
to  furnish,  a  considerable  quantity  of  flour  to  put  in  their  store- 
house for  the  needs  of  the  state,  since  they  wished,  they 
said,  to  make  an  expedition  for  our  general  welfare,  without 
telling  us  explicitly  where  they  intended  to  go  or  what  they  wished 
to  do. 

Oh!  As  we  have  not  appeared  wholly  disposed  to  consent  too 
blindly  to  their  requisition,  they  have  from  that  moment  deter- 
mined to  put  down  force  by  force ;  and  without  further  delay  they 
sent  one  of  their  officers,  a  sergent  followed  by  some  soldiers,  to 
search  all  the  mills  of  this  village  in  order  to  make  collections  on 
their  own  account,  according  to  the  amount  of  the  flour  which 
they  found  there  and  which  they  could  take  for  themselves.  This 
guard,  governed  by  their  evil  principles,  dared  to  break  the  doors, 
which  were  locked,  and  they  threatened  with  their  rifles  those  who 
were  bold  enough  to  make  opposition  to  their  infamous  violence; 
and  they  dared  further  to  mark  on  the  doors  of  each  mill  the  stamp 
of  the  State  of  Virginia,  as  a  sign  that  it  belonged  thereto.  Among 
those  who  had  mills,  there  was  only  M.  Beaulieu,  one  of  the  cap- 


546  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

il  ne  s'est  trouvd  que  M.  Beaulieu  I'un  des  Capitaines  de  milice 
d'icy  qui  s'y  est  expose  furieusement  et  contre  lequel  ils  n'ont  point 
ose  exercer  leur  cruelle  tiranie.  II  nous  reste  encore  a  savoir  si  la 
crainte  ou  la  honte  les  a  Retenus. 

Nous  voyant  done  ainsy  Molest^  par  nos  fidelles  allies  au  moins 
qui  osoient  se  servir  de  ce  titre  pretendu  nous  avons  soUicitd  afin 
que  les  soldats  fussent  dispense  dans  chaqu'une  de  nos  maisons 
esperant  par  la  estre  moins  Captive  et  pouvoir  mieux  conserver 
nos  Bestiaux  preferant  a  notre  malheureux  sort,  la  jaine  d'avoire 
chez  soye  une  troupe  de  Brigans  qui  loin  de  nous  estre  de  quelqu' 
utilitd  nous  sont  insuportables  et  pour  les  pensions  desquels  nous 
sommes  forces  a  tenir  des  billets  de  logement  en  payement  sans 
nul  espoir  d'en  estre  jamais  pay^. 

Nous  ne  vous  dirons  point  par  quel  heureux  destin  nous  nous  en 
ommes  trouves  debarasse.  Nous  scavons  seulement  que  par  un 
bonheur  imprevu  ils  ont  ^te  rapell^  aux  Kaskaskias  pour  passer 
leur  quartier  d'Hyver.  Ce  qui  nous  a  procure  une  grande  tran- 
uilitte  jusqu'a  ce  printems  dernier  ou  ayant  ete  menace  d'une  arm^e 
considerable  qui  se  formoit  de  la  part  des  royalistes  pour  venir 
nous  combattre  et  tacher  moyen  d'achever  notre  ruinne  tres  per- 
suade qu'elle  etoit  avancee  a  un  grand  point. 

Nous  crumes  done  apres  n'avoire  rien  a  craindre  en  commercant 
avec  eux  nos  Marchandises  denrees  meme  nos  animaux  de  toute 
espece  pour  leur  argent  qu'ils  nous  en  asseure  bonnes  et  qui  n'at 
aucuns  cours  en  ce  pays  pas  meme  entre  eux  ils  nous  ont  aussy 
charge  d'un  nombre  immense  de  lettres  de  change  sur  le  tresorie 
de  Virginie  dont  nous  ne  pouvons  rien  faire  et  dont  nous  sommes 
infectes  jusqu'a  present  et  ce  apres  nous  avoir  fidellement  promis 
que  ces  papiers  nous  seroient  paye  en  or  ou  bonnes  marchandises 
a  grand  prix  que  nous  pouvons  commercer  et  gagner  considera- 
blement. 

Non  contents  encor  de  nous  avoire  epuisd  et  ruin^  en  nous 
prenant  generallement  tout  nos  denrees  et  animaux  sans  nous  les 
payer  ne  voulant  pas  meme  nous  permettre  d'en  transporter 
sur  une  autre  rive  pour  en  tirer  de  quoy  nous  retire  ils  menacent 

1  Winter  of  17 79- 1780. 


MEMORIAL,  SEPTEMBER,  1780  547 

tains  of  militia  of  this  place,  who  exposed  himself  to  their  violence 
with  fury  and  against  whom  they  have  not  dared  to  exercise  their 
cruel  tyranny.  We  are  still  doubtful  whether  fear  or  shame 
restrained  them. 

Seeing  ourselves  thus  troubled  by  our  faithful  allies,  at  least 
by  those  who  dared  to  make  use  of  this  pretended  title,  we  have 
petitioned  that  the  soldiers  should  be  billeted  in  each  of  our 
houses,  since  we  hoped  thereby  to  be  less  held  captive  and  to  be 
better  able  to  preserve  our  animals,  preferring  in  our  unhappy 
lot  the  inconvenience  of  having  at  our  houses  a  troop  of  brig- 
ands, who,  far  from  being  of  any  use  to  us,  are  insupportable 
and  for  whose  board  we  are  obliged  to  take  in  payment  notes 
for  lodgment  without  any  hope  of  being  ever  paid. 

We  shall  not  tell  you  by  what  lucky  fate  we  were  freed  from 
them.  We  know  only  that  by  an  unforeseen  good  fortune  they 
were  recalled  to  Kaskaskia  to  pass  their  winter  quarters,^  which 
procured  for  us  a  great  peace  until  last  spring,  when  we  were 
menaced  by  a  considerable  army  which  was  formed  by  the  roy- 
alists to  come  to  attack  us  and  attempt  means  of  achieving  our 
ruin,  being  persuaded  that  it  had  reached  its  height. 

We  believed,  also,  that  there  was  nothing  to  fear  in  trading 
our  merchandise,  commodities  and  even  our  animals  of  all  kinds 
with  the  Virginians  for  their  money,  which  they  assured  us  was 
good,  and  which  had  no  currency  in  this  country  even  among 
themselves.  They  have  also  loaded  us  with  an  immense  number 
of  letters  of  exchange  on  the  treasury  of  Virginia,  with  which 
we  could  do  nothing  and  with  which  we  are  infected  up  to  the 
present ;  and  this  after  having  faithfully  promised  us  that  these 
would  be  paid  in  gold  or  good  merchandise  at  a  good  price,  with 
which  we  could  trade  and  make  a  considerable  gain. 

Not  content,  however,  with  having  exhausted  and  ruined  us 
by  taking  from  us  generally  all  our  commodities  and  animals 
without  paying  for  them  and  not  wishing  to  permit  us  to  export 
any  to  the  other  bank,  that  we  might  obtain  therefrom  wherewith 
to  recover  from  our  difficulties  [?],  they  threatened  with  cruel 
punishments  those  who  should  do  so  without  their  consent,  if 


548  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

de  cruelles  punitions  ceux  qui  le  pouvoient  faire  sans  leur  delibera- 
tion, s'il  y  etoit  surpris  et  souvant  se  sentant  fort,  par  la  facillitd 
avec  laquelle  ils  nous  ont  toujours  gouverne  jusqu'a  present  qu'ils 
font  plus  qu'a  menacer  parcequ'ils  en  viennent  a  des  faits. 

C'est  a  ce  moment  Mons:  que  nous  entreprenons  de  vous 
faire  le  plus  brievement  que  nous  pouvons  le  detaille  des  insup- 
ortables  manieres  d'agire  des  Trouppes  de  Virginie  a  notre  Egard, 
nous  qu'ils  ne  la  soit  de  traiter  d'amis  et  allies  fidelles,  ils  ont  droit 
en  quelque  sorte  parcequ'ils  ne  trouveroient  point  ailleur  d'amis 
si  bons  ny  si  doux  pour  eux. 

I.  Nous  commenfons  done  par  vous  rapporter  icy  que  le  Capi- 
taine  Rich^  McCarty  ayant  ete  renvoye  icy  I'annee  derniere  (apres 
I'expedition  marquee  du  Detroit)  pour  y  resider  en  qualite  de 
Commandant  est  arrive  avec  une  petite  garnison  dp  quarante 
Hommes  au  plus  qui  se  sont  loge  dans  une  maison  cise  en  ce 
Village  assez  propre  et  spacieuse  pour  y  loger  commodement  un 
certain  nombre  de  soldats  (nous  voyant  dans  I'impossibilit^  de 
faire  autrement)nous  nous  sommes  memes  oblige  tous  unanimement 
de  leur  procurer  une  quantite  suffisante  de  farinne  Mays  et  Viandes 
pour  leurs  substance  qu'ils  n'ont  pas  sans  doutte  trouve  suffisante 
puisque  les  soldats  ne  se  gennoient  point  pour  tuer  (meme  devant 
nous)  nos  pourceaux  et  autres  animaux  sans  que  leurs  Capi- 
taines  ou  officiers  s'empresassent  a'  y  mettre  ordre  quelques 
representations  qu'on  leurs  fisse. 

Probablement  un  Boeuf  de  Charue  qu'ils  ont  tue  sur  la  place 
devant  le  fort  appartenant  a  un  homme  pierre  Roux  que  le  Cappi- 
taine  du  detachement  a  paye  mais  le  tort  n'a  pas  ete  moins  grand 
pour  un  pauvre  Homme  a  qu'il  n'etoit  pas  possible  d'en  ra voire 
un  autre  pareille. 

Une  tor  d'environ  deux  ans  qu'ils  ont  tue  a  Monsieur  Trotier 
qu'il  luy  ont  paye  avec  un  bon  encore  a  estre  paye. 

Enfin  plusieurs  motiffs  aussy  sencible  qu'ils  seroit  innutile  de 
decrire  dans  cette  narration  croyant  ce  que  nous  avons  rapportes 
suffisant  pour  faire  voire  la  justice  de  ce  que  nous  avons  I'honneur 
de  vous  observer  Monsieur  et  qui  vous  font  assi  voire  que  les  Vir- 
ginniens  n'ont  jamais  eu  d'autre  butte  que  celuy  de  nous  opprimer 


MEMORIAL,  SEPTEMBER,  1780  549 

they  should  be  caught;  and  often  feehng  themselves  strong  on 
account  of  the  ease  with  which  they  have  always  governed  us 
up  to  the  present,  they  are  doing  more  than  threatening,  because 
they  come  to  deeds. 

It  is  now,  sir,  that  we  undertake  to  make  for  you  as  briefly 
as  possible  the  detailed  account  of  the  insupportable  manner  the 
troops  of  Virginia  have  acted  towards  us,  us  whom  they  were  to 
treat  as  friends  and  faithful  allies;  and  they  are  right  in  a  way 
because  they  would  not  find  elsewhere  friends  so  good  and  so 
gentle  to  them. 

I.  We  begin  then  by  reporting  to  you  here  that  Captain 
Richard  McCarty,  having  been  sent  here  last  year  (after  the 
failure  of  the  Detroit  expedition)  to  take  up  his  residence  as 
commandant,  arrived  with  a  little  garrison  of  forty  men  or 
more,  who  have  been  lodged  in  a  house  situated  in  this  village 
sufficiently  proper  and  spacious  to  lodge  there  easily  a  certain 
number  of  soldiers.  Since  we  saw  the  impossibility  of  doing 
otherwise,  we  unanimously  bound  ourselves  to  procure  for  them 
a  sufficient  quantity  of  flour,  corn  and  meat  for  their  subsist- 
ence, which  they  have  not  found  suflScient  undoubtedly,  since 
the  soldiers  made  no .  ceremonies  about  killing,  before  our  eyes 
even,  our  pigs  and  other  animals,  without  their  captains  and 
officers  bestirring  themselves  to  provide  therefor,  when  repre- 
sentations were  made  to  them. 

There  was  a  plough-ox  belonging  to  a  man  named  Pierre 
Roux,-  which  they  killed  on  the  square  before  the  fort  for  which 
the  captain  of  the  detachment  paid;  but  the  wrong  was  not  less 
great  to  a  poor  man  since  it  was  impossible  to  get  another 
like  it. 

A  heifer,  about  two  years  old,  belonging  to  M.  Trottier,  which 
they  killed,  and  for  which  they  settled  with  a  bon  still  to  be  paid. 

Finally  several  counts  as  obvious  as  they  would  be  useless 
to  describe  in  this  narrative,  for  we  believe  that  what  we  have 
reported  sufficient  to  make  you  see  the  justice  of  what  we  have 
the  honor  to  call  to  your  attention,  sir,  and  which  cause  us,  also, 
to  see  that  the  Virginians  have  never  had  other  end  than  that  of 


S50  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Changeant  eux  memes  en  la  plus  insuportable  Captivity  Pespoir 
dont  il  nous  avoit  flatt^  en  entrans  sur  nos  terres  de  jouir  comme 
eux  memes  des  douceurs  de  la  plus  paisible  possession  de  nos 
bien  et  d'une  entiere  liberty  et  qu'ils  veulent  a  present  nous  ravir. 

C'est  ce  que  nous  sommes  tons  Capable  de  soutenir  par  les 
serments  les  plus  inviolable  et  pourquoy  nous  avons  en  faire 
signe  pour  donner  force  aux  presentes. 

Mais  nous  ne  devons  nullement  doutter  que  le  voix  de  france 
le  plus  grand  de  tous  les  potentas  S'ignore  tr^s  certainement  la 
triste  et  deplorable  cituation  ou  sont  a  present  reduits  ses  tres 
fideles  et  bien  aim^s  sujets  Canadiens  et  Creole,  par  la  trop 
grande  Credulite  que  nous  avons  eu  en  la  fourberie  des  Trouppes 
Virginiennes  et  que  nous  avons  crus  ses  fidelles  allies  credulity 
si  funeste  pour  nous  et  dont  nous  ne  sommes  des  abuse  que  depuis 
que  vous  nous  avez  fait  I'honneur  de  nous  aider  de  vos  sages  et 
tres  puissant  Conseils. 

Pouvons  nous  croire  que  notre  genereux  et  tres  bon  pere  le 
roix  de  france  nous  abandonnoit  aussy  a  notre  malheureux  Sort 
s'il  pouvoit  une  fois  connoitre  les  fonds  de  nos  coeurs,  que  nous 
sommes  prets  a  luy  sacrifier  nous  nous  devons  croire  qu'il  penseroit 
plus  avantageusement  de  nous  et  ne  trouveroit  de  vray  bonheur 
pour  luy  qu'en  nous  procurant  a  I'avenir  un  bonheur  infinie  en 
nous  reprenant  sous  sa  protection  et  nous  declarant  ses  bien  aimds 
sujets  Esperons  cheres  compatriottes  qu'une  fois  persuade  et 
certain  de  notre  fidellites  de  coeur  que  non  seulement  il  nous 
reconnoitra  pour  ses  fidelles  enfants  et  nous  fournira  tous  les 
moyens  et  secour  necessaires  avec  lesquels  nous  pouvons  secouer 
le  fardeau  pesant  qui  nous  ^crassent  et  soutenu  par  un  tel  mon- 
arque  quelle  puissance  a  I'avenir  osera  entreprendre  de  nous 
subjuguer. 

C'est  done  Monsieur  avec  toutte  I'affection  et  zele  que  nous 
vous  promettons  que  vous  voudrez  bien  vous  interesser  a  nos 
maleurs  et  parler  en  notre  faveur  fasse  le  ciel  que  par  votre  inter- 
ception nous  puisions  parvenir  un  jour  a  ce  que  nous  aspirons  qui 
n'est  autre  chose  que  le  bonheur  et  nous  revoir  tous  francois. 
Nous  n'avons  autre  chose  a  vous  offrir  en  otage  que  la  plus  grande 


MEMORIAL,  SEPTEMBER,  1780  551 

oppressing  us  by  changing  into  the  most  insupportable  cap- 
tivity the  hope,  with  which  they  had  flattered  us  on  entering 
on  our  lands,  of  enjoying,  like  themselves,  the  sweetness  of  the 
most  peaceable  possession  of  our  goods  and  of  a  complete  liberty, 
of  which  they  wish  now  to  rob  us. 

This  is  what  we  are  all  capable  of  afiirming  by  the  most 
inviolable  oaths  and  why  we  have  caused  this  to  be  signed  in 
order  to  give  strength  to  these  presents. 

But  we  ought  in  no  way  to  doubt  that  the  public  opinion  of 
France,  the  grandest  of  all  povv-ers,  is  very  certainly  unacquainted 
with  the  sad  and  deplorable  situation  to  which  her  most  faithful 
and  well-loved  subjects,  Canadians  and  Creoles,  are  at  present 
reduced  by  the  too  great  credulity,  which  we  have  had,  in  the 
knavery  of  the  Virginian  troops  and  whom  we  have  believed  her 
faithful  allies;  a  credulity  so  fatal  for  us  and  of  which  we  have 
been  disabused  since  you  haye  made  us  the  honor  of  aiding  us 
with  your  wise  and  very  powerful  counsels. 

Can  we  believe  that  our  generous  and  very  good  father,  the 
King  of  France,  would  abandon  us  so  to  our  unhappy  lot,  if  he 
could  once  know  that  in  the  depths  of  our  hearts  we  are  ready  to 
sacrifice  ourselves;  we  must  believe  that  he  would  think  more 
highly  of  us  and  would  find  true  happiness  for  himself  only  in 
procuring  for  us  in  the  future  an  infinite  happiness  by  retaking  us 
under  his  protection  and  declaring  us  his  well-loved  subjects.  We 
hope,  dear  compatriots,  that  once  persuaded  and  certain  of  our 
fidelity  of  heart,  that  not  only  he  will  recognize  us  as  his  faithful 
children  and  will  furnish  us  all  the  necessary  means  and  succor 
with  which  we  can  shake  off  the  heavy  burden,  which  is  crushing 
us.  And  supported  by  such  a  monarch,  what  power  in  the  future 
will  dare  to  undertake  to  subjugate  us! 

It  is  then,  sir,  with  all  the  affection  and  zeal,  which  we  prom- 
ise you,  that  we  ask  you  to  be  willing  to  interest  yourself  in  our 
grievances  and  speak  in  our  favour.  May  the  Heavens  bring  it 
about  that  by  your  intervention  we  may  be  able  to  attain  that  to 
which  we  aspire,  which  is  nothing  else  than  the  happiness  of 
seeing  ourselves  again  all  French.    We  have  nothing  to  offer  you 


552  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

fidellit6  de  coeur  avec  laquelle  nous  ne  cesserons  d'estre  eter- 
nellement  avec  un  tr^s  profond  perspect. 

Monsieur 
Votre  Humbles  et  obiessants  serv'' 
Aux  Cahos  21  Sept.  1780 

Sign^  F.  Trottier  —  Philipe  Gervay  —  A.  Harmand  —  Le- 
page —  B.  Saucier  —  F.  Saucier  —  Langlois  —  Chabot  —  J 
B  Dube  —  DuCharme  —  Gabriel  Constant  —  Fr.  Courier  —  J 
G  Mercier  les  Personnes  qui  ont  signe  cy  dessus  I'ont  fait  au 
nom  de  tous  les  Habitants. 

Endorsed:  Declaration  des  Habitants  du  Cahokias  a  Mons: 
le  Colonel  Balme  du  Cahos  21  Sept.  1780. 

recu  le  4°^^  Dec^  1780. 
LiNCTOT  TO  G.  R.  Clark,  July  31,  1781. 
Monsieur 

Toujours  retenu  aux  Illinois  par  Maladie,  J'attend  avec  im- 
patience le  moment  ou  ma  Sante  pourra  me  permettre  d'aller 
vous  rejoindre  et  rendre  un  Compte  exacte  de  ma  mission  et 
de  mon  Sejour  en  ces  endroits. 

Un  nomme  Clairmon  depute  avec  Six  autres  particuliers  par  le 
Commandant  de  Michilimakinac  est  arrive  a  S*.  Louis  charge 
d'une  Lettre  adressee  au  habitans  des  Cahos  pour  les  exciter  a 
les  recevoir  et  a  se  tenir  sur  la  deffencive  contre  les  Espagnols; 
Monsieur  Don  Francois  Cruzat  Lieutenant  Colonel  et  Leiutenant 
Gouverneur  a  S*  Louis,  apres  des  recherches  exactes  au  Sujet  de 
Ces  envoyes  quil  a  fait  arreter  en  arrivant  et  S'etant  informe  de 
la  Lettre  mentionne  cy  dessus  S'en  est  empare,  et  s'est  ensuitte 
comporte  dans  cette  affaire  comme  un  homme  entierement  voue  au 
Service  des  Puissances  Unies :  Ne  reconnoissant  point  de  Maitres 
absolus  aux  Cahos  que  les  Ameriquains  Vainqueurs  de  cette 
partie,  il  n'apas  cru  devoir  rendre  compte  a  d'autres  qu'au  Major 
Williams  Ameriquain  et  employe  pour  les  Etats  dautant  que  cette 
affaire  lui  a  paru  purement  Militaire,  en  consequence  apres  lui 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  51J75,  original  manuscript. 

2  See  pp.  95,  555,  559.  As  is  pointed  out  in  the  Introduction,  p.  cv.,  there  is  reason  to 
believe  that  the  Spanish  commandant  did  not  act  in  as  good  faith  as  tins  letter  and  the  following 


LINCTOT  TO  CLARK,  JULY,  1781  553 

in  hostage  except  the  greatest  fidelity  of  heart  which  we  shall  never 
cease  having.     With  a  very  profound  respect 

Sir 
your  humble  and  obedient  servants 
At  Cahokia  September  21,  1780. 
Signed: 

F.  Trottier,  Philippe  Gervais,  A.  Harmand,  Lepage,  B.  Saucier, 
F.  Saucier,  Langlois,  Chabot,  J.  B.  Diibe,  DuCharme,  Gabriel 
Constant,  Fr.  Courier,  J.  G.  Mercier.  The  persons  who  have 
signed  hereabove  have  done  so  in  the  name  of  all  the  inhabitants. 

Endorsed:  Declaration  of  the  Inhabitants  of  Cahokia  to  M. 
Colonel  Balme.     Cahokia  September  21,  1780. 

Received  December  4,  1780. 

LmcTOT  TO  G.  R.  Clark,  July  31,  1781.^ 
Sir: 

Still  detained  in  the  Illinois  by  sickness,  I  am  waiting  with 
impatience  the  moment  when  my  health  will  permit  me  to  rejoin 
you  and  render  a  detailed  account  of  my  mission  and  of  my  so- 
journ in  these  parts. 

A  man  named  Clairmont,  deputed  with  six  other  individuals  by 
the  commandant  of  Michillimackinac,  has  arrived  at  St.  Louis, 
intrusted  with  a  letter  addressed  to  the  inhabitants  of  Cahokia  in 
order  to  move  them  to  receive  the  messengers  and  to  hold  them- 
selves on  the  defensive  against  the  Spaniards.^  Don  Francois 
Cruzat,  lieutenant  colonel  and  lieutenant  governor  at  St.  Louis, 
after  a  minute  examination  in  regard  to  these  envoys,  whom  he 
caused  to  be  arrested  upon  their  arrival,  and  after  being  informed 
of  the  letter  mentioned  above,  has  taken  possession  thereof,  and 
has,  thereafter,  acted  in  this  affair  as  a  man  entirely  devoted  to  the 
service  of  the  united  powers.  Since  he  recognized  as  absolute 
masters  at  Cahokia  only  the  Americans,  conquerors  of  this  region, 
he  did  not  believe  that  it  was  his  duty  to  render  account  to  any 
one  except  Major  Williams,  an  American  and  in  the  employ  of  the 
states,  in  as  much  as  this  affair  appeared  to  him  purely  military. 

one  would  make  it  appear.  It  seems  almost  incredible  that  both  Linctot  and  Gratiot  should 
be  ignorant  that,  at  the  time  they  were  writing,  two  of  the  British  agents  were  in  Cahokia  by 
permission  of  the  Spanish  commandant. 


554  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

avoir  fait  part  de  toutes  Ses  decouvertes  il  lui  a  envoy^  copie 
exacte  de  la  Susditte  Lettre:  cette  conduitte  pnidente  de  la  part 
de  Monsieur  De  Cruzat  na  pas  laiss6  d'occasionner  des  rumeurs, 
des  propos  indiscrets  et  dexciter  une  jalousie  outr^e  dans  plusieurs 
particuliers  tant  aux  Cahos  qu'au  Kaskaskias  qui  tous  en  parti- 
culier  pretendent  etre  absolus  et  les  Seuls  a  qui  Ion  doive  rendre 
compte.  Comme  ceci  pourroit  occasionner  de  la  mesintelligence 
et  querelle  entre  les  deux  parties,  il  seroit  bon  d'etablir  en  Ces 
endroits  un  Maitre  et  Savoir  a  qui  se  communiquer  en  affair  d' 
Importance  Sans  etre  oblig^  de  Se  commuiquer  a  une  populace 
ignorante,  emportee,  indiscrette,  et  Souvent  partagee  dans  ses 
opignons. 

Par  un  expr^s  nous  venons  d'apprendre  que  le  Florida  a  ete 
prise  par  les  Espanols.  Monsieur  De  Galves,  Gouverneur  de 
la  Nouvelle  Orlean  et  qui  Merite  tous  les  dloges  possibles  par 
I'activite,  intelligence  et  intrepidite  quil  a  fait  paroitre,  S'est 
empard  de  Pinsacola  apres  lo  jours  de  tranchee  ouverte,  Je  vous 
envoye  le  detail  de  cette  prise  tel  qu'on  la  envoye  a  M^  De  Cruzat 
Commandant  en  ce  Poste  Les  Natchez  apres  avoir  ete  pris  par 
le  Meme  Monsieur  De  Galvez  en  Son  absence  Se  Sont  revolt^  et 
pris  les  Armes  contre  les  Espagnols  quils  en  ont  chasse  ou  fait 
prisonnier.  Monsieur  De  Miro  occupant  la  second  rang  a  la 
Nouvelle  Orlean  les  a  reconquis  de  nouveaux.  On  ne  Sait  ce 
qui  arrivera  a  M^  Bleomar  auteur  de  cette  Revoke  et  D'autres. 

En  attendant  le  plaisir  de  vous  voir  permett^s  moi  de  souhait 
a  vos  Armes  tout  le  Succes  possible  et  de  me  dire  avec  Respect 
Monsieur         Votre  tr^s  humble  &  tres 

Obeissant  Serviteur, 
S*  Louis  31  Juillet  1781  Godefroy  Linctot 

Pour  Le  Service  Public 

Gratiot  to  G.  R.  Clark,  August  i,  1781. 
Monsieur 

Je  profite  de  I'occasion  que  me  procure  M''.  Linctot  qui  est 
icy  malade,  pour  vous  faire  part  des  bonnes  nouvelles  que  nous 
avons  avons  [sic]  refue  par  la  prise  de  Panjacole  que  Monsieur  De 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  51J77,  original  manuscript. 


GRATIOT  TO  CLARK,  AUGUST,  1781  555 

Consequently,  after  having  informed  him  of  all  his  discoveries,  he 
sent  an  exact  copy  of  the  aforesaid  letter.  This  prudent  conduct 
on  the  part  of  M.  Cruzat  has  not  failed  to  occasion  murmurs  and 
indiscreet  talk  and  to  excite  unreasonable  jealousy  in  several 
individuals  both  at  Cahokia  and  Kaskaskia,  all  of  whom  privately 
claim  to  be  absolute  and  the  only  ones  to  whom  account  should 
be  rendered.  Since  this  can  cause  misunderstanding  and  strife 
between  the  two  parties,  it  would  be  well  to  appoint  in  these  parts 
some  one  with  power  and  knowledge  to  whom  communications 
could  be  made  in  affairs  of  importance,  so  that  it  would  not  be 
necessary  to  make  communications  to  a  populace,  ignorant,  hot- 
headed, indiscreet,  and  often  divided  in  its  opinion. 

By  an  express  we  have  just  learned  that  Florida  has  been 
captured  by  the  Spaniards.  M.  de  Galvez,  governor  of  New 
Orleans,  who  deserves  all  possible  praise  on  account  of  the  activity 
intelligence  and  intrepidity,  which  he  has  shown,  has  posse^^sed 
himself  of  Pensacola  after  ten  days  of  open  trenching.  I  am  send- 
ing you  the  detail  of  this  capture  as  it  is  reported  to  M.  Cruzat, 
commandant  of  this  post.  The  people  of  Natchez,  after  having 
been  taken  by  the  same  M.  de  Galvez,  have  revolted  in  his  absence 
and  taken  arms  against  the  Spaniards,  whom  they  have  driven 
out  or  made  prisoners.  M.  Miro,  who  has  the  second  rank  at 
New  Orleans,  has  reconquered  them.  It  is  not  known  what  will 
be  done  to  M.  Bleomar,  author  of  this  revolt  and  of  others. 

While  awaiting  the  pleasure  of  seeing  you,  permit  me  to  wish 
your  arms  all  possible  success  and  to  call  myself  with  respect, 
Sir,  your  very  humble  and  very  obedient  servant, 

Godcfroy  Linctot. 
St.  Louis,  July  31,  1 781. 
for  the  public  service. 

Gratiot  to  Clark,  August  i,  1781.^ 
Sir: 

I  profit  by  the  opportunity  which  M.  Linctot,  who  is  sick,  pro- 
cures me  to  inform  you  of  the  good  news,  which  we  have  received, 
of  the  capture  of  Pensacola,  which  M.  de  Galvez  has  subjected  to 
the  dominion  of  His  Catholic  Majesty.     From  the  account  which 


5S6  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Galvez  Gouverneur  de  la  Nouvelle  Orlean  a  Soumise  a  I'obeissance 
de  Sa  Majeste  Catholique,  I'on  peut  dire  par  la  Relation  que  nous 
avons  Refue  icy  que  ce  n'est  qu'avec  bien  des  difficultes  et  par  une 
grande  intrepidite  de  la  part  de  ce  General,  S'il  a  conquis  cette 
Ville  et  cette  Province,  ou  il  a  eu  le  Malheur  d'etre  blessd  en 
enfaisant  le  Siege  mais  par  bonheur  fort  legerement;  nous  navons 
eu  dans  Tarmee  de  M^.  De  Galvez  que  trois  cent  hommes  tue  et 
blesse,  mais  dans  celle  des  Anglois  cinq  cent  ont  reste  mort  sur 
le  Champt  de  Bataille  et  treize  cent  fait  prisonniers  tons  de  troupes 
reglee;  Jespere  qu'apres  une  prise  aussi  glorieuse  pour  les 
armes  d'Espagne,  et  le  desaventage  des  Anglois  dans  toute  leurs 
expeditions,  que  bientot  nous  aurons  une  paix  heureuse  qui  nous 
prociurera  I'abondance  dont  depuis  longtems  nous  sommes  prives. 

Je  ne  sais  cy  vous  aures  ete  informe  quil  y  a  quelques  terns, 
un  Nomme  Clairmon  envoye  avec  Six  hommes  par  le  Command- 
ant de  Michilimakinac  avec  une  Lettre  adressee  aux  habitans 
des  Cahos  et  des  Kaskaskias,  par  laquelle  il  les  engagoient  de 
lever  des  Compagnies  de  Milice  qui  Seroient  payee  par  le  Roy 
D'Angleterre  afin  de  Sopposer  a  leurs  Ennemis,  Ses  hommes  etant 
heureusement  arrete  a  S*  Louis  Monsieur  Don  Francois  Cruzat 
Lieutenant  Colonel  et  Lieutenant  Gouverneur  en  ce  Village  les 
a  arrete,  et  a  envoye  copie  de  la  ditte  Lettre  au  Major  Williams; 
Sans  cette  prudence  de  la  part  de  notre  Commandant  je  ne  Sais 
Comment  les  Habitans  de  votre  rive  en  auroient  agi,  vous  Saves 
ce  qu'est  un  peuple  sans  chef  et  ou  tout  particuliers  ce  croit  en 
droit  d'agir  en  toute  liberte  et  Selon  Sa  volonte,  Je  Sais  Seulement 
qu'il  y  en  a  plusieurs  qui  ont  temoigne  du  mecontentement  de  ce 
que  M^  Cruzat  ne  leur  remettoit  pas  une  Lettre  qui  leurs  avoient 
ete  adressee,  mais  toute  personnes  qui  pencerons  un  peu  juste  ne 
pourrons  que  Ten  louer  d'en  avoir  agi  de  la  Sorte. 

Depuis  votre  depart  des  Cahos  I'annee  derniere  il  m'est  arrive 
bien  des  evenemens,  vous  saures  qu'a  present  ja  Suis  resident  a 
S*.  Louis  n'ayant  pu  reste  plus  longtems  dans  un  village  ou  il  reg- 
noit  cy  peu  d'union  par  la  liberte  efrenee  qui  y  regnoit  alors,  je  me 
reserve  a  la  premiere  entrevue  a  vous  conter  tous  les  desagremens 
que  jy  ai  essuie,  de  plus  depuis  quelques  tems  jai  ete  taxce  par  trois 


GRATIOT  TO  CLARK,  AUGUST,  1781  557 

we  have  received  here,  it  can  be  said  it  is  only  with  much  difficulty 
and  by  great  bravery  on  the  part  of  this  general  that  he  has  con- 
quered this  town  and  this  province,  where  he  has  had  the  rpis- 
fortune  to  be  wounded,  while  conducting  the  seige,  but  fortunately 
very  lightly.  We  had  in  the  army  of  M.  de  Galvez  only  three 
hundred  men  wounded,  but  in  that  of  the  English  five  hundred 
remained  dead  on  the  battle  field  and  thirteen  hundred  were  made 
prisoners,  all  regular  troops.  I  hope  that  after  a  capture  so  glori- 
ous for  the  arms  of  Spain  and  the  disadvantage  of  the  English  in 
all  their  expeditions,  that  soon  we  shall  have  a  favorable  peace, 
which  will  procure  for  us  the  abundance  of  which  we  have  need 
for  so  long. 

I  do  not  know  if  you  have  been  informed  that,  some  time  ago,  a 
man,  named  Clairmont  was  sent  with  six  men  by  the  commandant 
of  Michillimackinac  with  a  letter  addressed  to  the  inhabitants  of 
Cahokia  and  Kaskaskia,  by  which  he  invited  them  to  raise  com- 
panies of  militia,  to  be  paid  by  the  king  of  England,  in  order  to 
make  opposition  to  their  enemies.  Fortunately  these  men  stopped 
at  St.  Louis  and  Don  Francois  Cruzat,  lieutenant  colonel  and 
lieutenant  governor  in  this  village,  arrested  them  and  sent  copies 
of  the  said  letter  to  Major  Williams.  Without  this  prudence  on 
the  part  of  our  commandant,  I  do  not  know  how  the  inhabitants 
of  your  bank  would  have  acted.  You  know  what  people  are 
without  a  head  and  where  every  individual  believes  himself  within 
his  rights  in  acting  with  full  liberty  and  according  to  his  caprice. 
I  know  only  that  there  are  several  who  have  shown  discontent, 
because  M.  Cruzat  did  not  send  to  them  a  letter  which  was  ad- 
dressed to  them ;  but  all  persons  who  think  a  little  justly  can  only 
praise  him  for  having  acted  in  such  a  manner. 

Since  your  departure  from  Cahokia  last  year,  many  events  have 
occurred.  You  know  that  at  present  I  am  residing  at  St.  Louis, 
since  I  could  not  remain  a  longer  time  in  a  village  where  so  little 
unity  ruled  on  account  of  the  unbridled  liberty  which  reigned 
there.  I  am  waiting  for  the  opportunity  of  the  first  interview  to 
recount  to  you  all  the  annoyances  which  I  have  experienced;  the 
more  so  because,  some  time  ago,  I  was  accused  by  three  men  of 


558  ILLINOIS' HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

hommes  de  traison,  d'avoir  envoyd  Ma  Berge  au  Secour  de  Nos 
ennemis,  je  vous  prie  Mons'^.  de  vouloir  bien  dcrire  at  rendre 
temoignage  de  ma  conduitte  a  cette  Occasion,  jespere  que  Votre 
certificat  pourra  retablir  mon  honneur  attaqued  et  donner  du  pois 
a  ma  justification.  [Ms.  illegible.]  le  retablissement  de  M^Linc- 
tot  pour  avoir  le  plaisir  de  vous  voir  et  aller  faire  un  tour  du 
Cote  de  la  Virginie. 

Permettes  moi  de  vous  feliciter  Sur  votre  avencement  au 
Service  des  Etats  Unis,  j'espere  que  I'occasion  de  vous  Signaler 
ne  vous  Manquerons  pas,  je  Souhaitte  que  vos  armes  soyent  vic- 
torieuse  contre  tous  vos  ennemis,  et  que  Ion  vous  voye  par  tout 
avec  ce  courage,  cette  prudence  et  Sagesse  qui  ne  vous  a  jamais 
abandonee  ce  Sont  les  desirs  de  celui  qui  est  avec  respect  Votre 
tres  humble  Serviteur  Ch  Gratiot 

S*  Louis  le  I®  Aoust  1781 
[Addressed]  A  Monsieur 

Monsieur  George  Rogers  Clark  Ecuer  Brigadie  General  des 
Armee  des  Etats  Unis  et  Commandant  en  Chef  du  Departement 
de  West  A  la  Chute 

GiRARDiN  TO  Sinclair,  November  3,  1781. 
Monsieur, 

Vous  serez  puttetre  surpris  du  motiffe  qui  me  fait  prendre  la 
liberty  de  vous  ecrire  cette  present  Lettre  puisque  Je  n'ai  dautre 
vue  que  de  vous  prevenir  de  ce  qui  se  passe  icy  et  des  intentions 
de  la  plus  grande  partie  des  Habitans  de  cette  Rives  que  vous 
pense  veritablement  ou  bons  ameriquains  ou  bons  EspagnoUes 
bien  qu'enterieurement  ils  ne  soient,  suivant  ce  que  je  puis  voir 
ni  lun  ni  lautre. 

Vous  en  auriez  et6  d6ja  persuade  il  i  a  meme  longtemps  si  les 
personnes  que  vous  aviez  depute  pour  negocier  avec  vous  un 
Traitte  de  Commerce  dans  le  Mississipy   ou   dependences   des 

1  In  March,  1780,  Gratiot  and  Pepin,  protected  by  trading  permits  from  the  Spanish 
commandant  and  Colonel  Montgomery,  started  with  a  boatload  of  goods  for  Prairie  du 
Chien,  at  that  time  in  possession  of  the  British.  They  were  associated  in  the  enterprise 
with  Mr.  Kay,  of  Michillimackinac.  A  few  leagues  above  Cahokia  they  handed  the  boat 
over  to  a  man  named  Cardinal,  who  conducted  it  to  its  destination,  where  he  and  the  crew 
were  put  in  prison  and  the  boat  confiscated.  On  escaping,  three  of  the  crew  sued  Gratiot 
for  wages,  and  made  the  above  accusation  against  him.  This  v/as  later  withdrawn.  The 
statement  by  Cardinal  is  in  Can.  Archives,  B.,  97,  vol.  ii.,  p.  536.  See  also  Dillon,  Annals  of 
St.  Louis,  I.,  209. 


GIRARDIN  TO  SINCLAIR,  NOVEMBER,  1781         559 

treason  and  of  having  sent  my  barge  to  the  succor  of  our  enemies. 
I  pray  you,  sir,  to  consent  to  write  and  bear  witness  of  my  conduct 
on  that  occasion.  I  hope  that  your  certificate  will  be  able  to 
re-establish  my  honor,  which  has  been  attacked  and  give  weight  to 
my  justification.'  [MS.  illegible]  the  recovery  of  M.  Linctot  to 
have  the  pleasure  of  seeing  you  and  going  to  make  a  tour  of  the 
Virginia  coast. 

Permit  me  to  congratulate  you  on  your  promotion  to  the  service 
of  the  United  States.  I  hope  that  the  opportunity  to  signalize 
yourself  will  not  fail  you;  I  hope  that  your  arms  will  be  victorious 
against  all  your  enemies  and  that  you  may  be  seen  everywhere 
with  that  courage,  that  prudence  and  wisdom,  which  has  never 
failed  you.  These  are  the  desires  of  one  who  is  with  respect 
your  very  humble  servant,  Charles  Gratiot. 

St.  Louis,  August  I,  1 78 1. 

Addressed  To  M.  George  Rogers  Clark,  Esquire 

Brigadier  General  of  the  army  of  the  United 
States^  and  Commander  in  Chief  of  the  Depart- 
ment of  the  West.     At  the  Falls. 

GiRARDiN  TO  Sinclair,  November  3,  1781.^ 
Sir: 

You  will  be  perhaps  surprised  at  the  motive  which  makes  me 
take  the  liberty  of  writing  to  you  this  present  letter,  since  I  have 
no  other  than  to  inform  you  of  what  is  taking  place  here  and  of  the 
sentiments  of  the  majority  of  the  inhabitants  of  this  bank,  whom 
you  think  indeed  are  either  good  Americans  or  good  Spaniards, 
although  they  are  not  all  either  one  or  the  other,  as  I  can  see. 
You  would  have  been  long  ago  persuaded  thereof,  if  the  persons 
whom  you  sent  to  negotiate  with  us  a  treaty  concerning  trade  on 
the  Mississippi  or  in  the  dependencies  of  the  Illinois  [had  exercised 
judgment].*  The  treaty  would  certainly  have  been  accepted, 
seeing  that  it  would  procure  for  us  the  advantage  of  obtaining  our 
necessities  in  merchandise  all  and  singular,  for  which  we  would 
have  given  in  payment  either  our  peltries  or  commodities.     But 

2  A  mistake.     Clark  held  this  rank  in  the  army  of  Virginia. 

3  Can.  Archives,  B.,  98,  p.  87,  from  a  copy. 
*  See  supra  pp.  553  el  seq. 


56o  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

islenois  qui  certainement  auroit  ^t^  accept^  vue  qu'il  nous  procur- 
oit  I'avantage  de  tirer  nos  besoms  en  Marchandise  generallement 
quelconque  pour  laquelle  nous  avions  donne  en  payement  soit 
nos  Pelleries  ou  Denrees.  Mais  souffrez  que  je  vous  dise  que  vos 
deputes  si  sont  trop  malprise  pour  esper  la  reussite  de  leurs  voya- 
ges. Vue  qu'ils  ont  arrete  a  St.  Louis  ou  ils  ne  devoient  pas,  par 
les  EspagnoUes  qui  n'ont  que  de  I'avarice  mais  tres  peu  de  con- 
noissance  et  naturellement  ambitieux  jaloux  et  mefiant  quand  il 
ne  le  faut  pas,  les  ont  arrete  sans  raisons,  et  nous  n'avons  pu 
les  Ravoir  qu'au  Moyenne  de  bon  Caution  Domicilies  de  ce  lieu 
qui  ont  engage  la  meilleure  partie  de  leur  bien  leurs  Corps  meme 
pour  les  retirer,  bien  entendus  qu'ils  seroient  garder  a  vue  chez 
nous  sans  en  pouvoir  sortir  sous  quelque  pretexte  qui  se  peutetre 
sans  le  plein  consentement  des  Commandants  de  Tune  et  I'autre 
partie.  lis  auroient  bien  pu  s'epagner  cette  Epocque  qui  nous 
fait  un  tort  considerable  a  tous  sils  si  etoient  pris  comme  ils  1'- 
auroient  pus  faire,  mais  ayant  vue  moi  meme  que  c'a  n'etoit  qu'un 
etouderie  que  cette  faut  ne  dependoit  que  du  peut  de  Connoissance 
qu'ils  ont  pour  des  affaires  d'un  telle  consequence,  Je  me  suis 
charg^  du  soin  de  Monsieur  Langlois  qui  s'est  trouve  icy  sans 
nule  resource  auquel  j'ai  Procure  au  temps  [autant?]  qu'il  a  ete 
en  mon  pouvoir  le  moyen  de  se  retirer  d'icy  et  c'est  par  lui- 
meme  que  j'ai  I'honeur  de  vous  adresser  cette  Lettre,  qui  vous 
informe  de  la  bonne  intentions  des  Habitans  de  ces  Lieux.  Je 
les  crois  disposes  pour  [?]  mes  persuader  qu'ils  ne  seroient  pas 
fache  de  se  revoir  dependant  et  sujet  a  la  Domination  Angloise. 
Les  Besoins  les  y  force  absolument,  ils  ne  peuvent  plus  tenir  i  s 
ont  tous  un  Besoin  urgent  des  marchandises  et  je  pense  qu'un 
pavilion  angloise  seroit  bien  recue  chez  nous  si  le  parti  n'etoit 
compris  que  de  Blancs,  sans  qu'il  y  eut  un  seul  sauvage  avec 
eux,  mais  s'il  y  en  avoit  je  douterois  fort  de  I'enterpirse  car  tout 
le  monde  de  tous  les  villages  de  ce  continent  sont  determine 
suivant  les  apparences  a  bien  rendre  leur  vie  plutot  que  de  ce 
rendre  a  des  barbares. 

Les  Commercants  meme  ne  demanderont  peut  etre  pas  mieut 
qu'a  tenter  I'entreprise,  le  grand  Profit  qu'il  pouroit  faire  dans  la 


GIRARDIN  TO  SINCLAIR,  NOVEMBER,  1781         561 

suffer  me  to  tell  you  that  your  deputies  have  made  too  many  mis- 
takes to  expect  success  from  their  journey ;  for  they  stopped  at  St. 
Louis,  which  they  should  not  have  done,  and  the  Spaniards,  who 
have  only  avarice  but  very  little  knowledge  and  are  naturally' 
ambitious,  jealous  and  defiant,  when  there  is  no  need,  have  arrest- 
ed them  without  cause ;  and  we  have  been  able  to  get  them  back 
only  by  means  of  offering  bondsmen  domiciled  in  this  place,  who 
have  engaged  the  better  part  of  their  property  and  even  their  bodies 
to  release  them;  and  it  was  indeed  agreed  that  they  should  be 
kept  in  sight  among  us  and  that  they  could  not  leave  here  under 
any  pretext  whatsoever  without  the  full  consent  of  the  command- 
ants of  both  places.  They  might  have  been  able  to  be  spared 
this  period  which  caused  a  considerable  wrong  to  us  all,  if  they 
had  gone  at  it  in  the  way  they  might  have  done;  but  since  I  myself 
saw  that  it  was  only  a  heedless  action  and  that  this  fault  was 
the  result  of  the  little  knowledge  which  they  have  for  affairs  of 
such  consequence,  I  have  taken  on  myself  the  care  of  M.  Langlois 
who  is  here  without  any  resources.  I  have  procured  for  him, 
inasmuch  as  he  has  been  in  my  care,  the  means  of  withdrawing 
from  here;  and  it  is  by  him  that  I  have  the  honor  of  sending  you 
this  letter,  which  will  inform  you  of  the  good  sentiments  of  the 
inhabitants  of  these  regions.  I  believe  them  so  disposed  that  I 
am  persuaded  that  they  would  not  be  offended  at  seeing  them- 
selves again  dependent  and  subject  to  the  English  Government. 
Necessities  have  absolutely  forced  them  to  it ;  they  can  no  longer 
hold  out;  they  all  have  an  urgent  need  of  merchandise  and  I 
think  that  an  English  flag  would  be  well  received  among  us,  if 
the  party  was  composed  only  of  whites  without  a  single  savage 
being  with  it;  but  if  there  was,  I  would  be  very  doubtful  of 
the  success  of  the  enterprise ;  for  everybody  in  all  the  villages 
of  this  continent  is  determined,  according  to  appearances,  to 
give  up  his  life  rather  than  to  surrender  to  the  barbarians. 

The  merchants  indeed  will  demand,  perhaps,  nothing  better 
than  to  attempt  the  enterprise.  The  great  profit  which  can  be 
made  in  trade  could  compensate  them  doubly  for  the  expense. 
As  for  myself,  if  you  decide  to  make  the  expedition,  I  offer  my 


562  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

commerce  les  pouvoit  de  dommager  doublement  de  leurs  fraits 
pour  moi  si  vous  trouvez  juste  d'en  faire  I'expedition  Je  m'offre 
en  tout  ce  que  je  pourrais  faire  pour  vue  que  je  sois  avertis  par 
quelques  personnes  eclaire,  quel  que  jour  avant  I'arrivee  des 
parties  ici,  et  j'ose  me  tenir  fort  de  disposer  tous  les  habitans  a 
vous  recevoir  librement  pour  vue  toutte  fois  qu'il  n'y  aye  point 
de  Sauvages  mele  dans  votre  Detachement,  Je  ne  doutte  pas 
qu'on  ne  nous  accuse  de  Rebelles  pour  avoir  sans  resistance  souf- 
fert  I'entre  des  Ameriquains  etre  nous  mais  que  pent  faire  un 
peuple  abandonne  que  Ton  aveugle  par  mille  beaux  discours  dont 
nous  sommes  encore  a  voir  les  effets  joignant  a  cela  crainte  de  ne 
pouvoir  trop  vitte  abuser  de  notre  Credulity  les  menaces  de  nous 
nuire,  si  de  bon  Coeur  nous  ne  consentions  a  leur  faire  un  serment 
inviolable  il  nous  a  don  fallut  pour  nous  menager  la  propriety 
de  nos  biens  consentir  a  tout  ce  qu'ils  ont  voulus.  Nous  ne  nous 
croirions  de  ne  pas  engager  a  rien,  si  nous  nous  relevions  nous 
memes  d'un  serment  que  nous  avons  ete  oblig^  de  faire. 

II  est  bon  de  vous  observer  Monsieur  qu'il  i  aura  quelques  ob- 
stacles pour  passer  aux  portes  que  les  EspagnoUes  occupe  mais  j'ai 
lieu  de  croire  qu'une  fois  entre  che  vous  vous  i  trouverez  tous  les 
besoins  de  bouches  qui  vous  seront  necessaire  pour  en  faire  I'- 
expedition. Je  ne  doute  pas  non  plus  qu'il  ni  en  aye  beaucoup 
de  nous  qui  ne  se  joignant  a  vous  meme  de  ceux  qui  dependent 
des  EspagnoUes  qui  comme  nous  reduit  au  plus  pressant  besoins 
de  tous  voudront  rester  neutre  ou  peutetre  se  mettre  avant. 

J'espere  monsieur  qu'en  cas  que  mes  speculations  n'ayent 
aucuns  Lieux  et  que  vous  ne  veuillez  tenter  1 'enterprise  que  ma 
Lettre  ne  sera  point  communique  a  personne  afin  de  m'epargner 
ainsi  qua  celui  qui  ecrit  cette  Lettre  les  poursuittes  que  pour- 
roit  faire  les  ammeriquains  et  les  EspagnoUes  aux  quelles  pour- 
suittes il  ne  vous  serait  pas  peutetre  aise  'de  nous  sous  traire. 

Je  suis  Monsieur 
en  esperant  votre  protection 
Votre  tres  humble  et  obeissant  Serviteur 
aux  Chakokias     3  9^^^  1781  (signe)  Antoine  Girardin 

Monsieur  Sinclair,  Gouverneur. 


GIRARDIN  TO  SINCLAIR,  NOVEMBER,  1781         563 

services  in  everything  that  I  can  do,  provided  that  I  am  informed 
by  some  instructed  persons  a  few  days  before  the  arrival  of  the 
parties  here;  and  I  dare  to  hold  myself  ready  to  prepare  all  the 
inhabitants  to  receive  you  freely,  provided  there  should  be  no 
savages  mingled  in  your  detachment.  I  do  not  doubt  that  we  are 
accused  with  being  rebels  for  having  suffered  without  resistance 
the  entrance  of  the  Americans  among  us;  but  what  could  a 
deserted  people  do,  who  were  blinded  by  a  thousand  beautiful 
speeches,  of  which  we  are  still  to  see  the  results,  and  there  was 
joined  therewith,  for  fear  of  the  impossibility  of  so  quickly  delud- 
ing our  credulity,  threats  of  destruction,  if  we  should  not  consent 
cheerfully  to  make  to  them  an  inviolable  oath.  It  was  for  us  a 
necessary  gift,  to  consent  to  all  they  have  desired,  in  order  to  pro- 
cure for  ourselves  the  security  of  our  property.  We  would  not 
believe  ourselves  in  any  way  bound,  if  we  should  free  ourselves  of 
an  oath  which  we  have  been  forced  to  make. 

It  is  well  to  call  your  attention,  sir,  that  there  will  be  some 
obstacles  to  pass  at  the  posts  which  the  Spaniards  occupy,  but  I 
am  right  in  believing  that  once  entered  into  our  villages,  you  will 
find  there  all  the  necessary  provisions  which  you  will  need  in 
order  to  make  the  expedition.  I  no  longer  doubt  but  that  there 
would  be  many  of  us  who  would  join  themselves  to  you,  even  of 
those  who  are  subject  to  the  Spaniards,  who,  like  ourselves,  are 
reduced  to  the  most  pressing  needs  and  will  wish  to  remain  neutral 
or  perhaps  to  take  an  active  part. 

I  hope,  sir,  that,  in  case  my  speculations  should  have  no  results 
and  you  should  be  unwilling  to  attempt  the  enterprise,  my 
letter  will  not  be  communicated  to  any  one,  in  order  to  spare  me  as 
well  as  him  who  writes  this  letter  the  prosecutions  which  the 
Americans  and  the  Spaniards  might  make,  from  which  prosecu- 
tions it  would  not  be  easy  for  you  to  screen  us. 

I  am,  sir,  in  the  hope  of  your  protection  your  very  humble  and 
obedient  servant 

At  Cahokia  November  3,  1781.        (Signed)  Antoine  Girardin. 
[Addressed]        M.  Sinclair, 

Governor. 


564  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Ordinance  of  the  Court  of  Cahokia,  June  ii,  1783. 

Lan  Mil  Sept  Cent  quatre  vingt  trois  le  onzieme  jour  du  mois 
de  juin  En  vertu  de  la  Cour  tenue  cejourd'huy  an  nom  du  public, 
pour  Deliberer  Sur  la  quantite  de  terre  qui  reste  a  prendre  Dans 
La  Prairie  du  pond,  propre  pour  le  Culture,  a  Et^  decide  par 
ladite  Cour  quil  Soit  fait  une  recapitulation  de  la  quantite  de 
sitoyen  Leurs  donnant  la  preference  a  tous  autres,  Et  quansuitte 
il  soit  mentione  de  la  quantity  de  terre  quil  pent  y  avoir  a  prendre 
Sans  faire  tor  au  terrin  quil  convient  de  reserver  pour  la  Commune 
Et  En  Suitte  que  Ion  fera  passer  laditte  cloture  Commune  par 
derriere  le  terrin  qui  appartient  a  Joseph  Mesonville,  Et  de  la 
Joindre  la  Coule  des  liar  le  long  de  laquelle  passera  Laditte 
Cloture,  Jusqua  la  pointe  a  butau  Et  de  la  En  gagnant  La 
pointe  de  bois  du  Grand  Cotau  en  Cas  quil  se  trouve  asse  Dabi- 
tant  pour  prendre  des  terre  jusque  la,  Et  a  Ce  deffaut  La  Cloture 
arrettera  a  la  fin  des  derniere  terre  Borne  Et  prise  par  les  dits 
habitant,  Et  Sont  Convenu  En  outre  que  Comme  Lesdittes  terres 
dans  letendu  quelles  ont  ne  Sont  pas  aussi  avantageuse  Les  une 
Comme  Les  autres,  quil  faut  Des  Billet  qui  Seront  tire  au  Sort, 
Et  que  chaq'un  qui  tirrera  Son  Billet,  Sera  force  de  faire  Sa 
Cloture  Suivant  Son  numero  Cest  a  dire  prendront  lesdittes 
Clotures  au  bout  de  Celle  des  habitants  qui  ont  deja  [?]  labourre 
Dans  le  Cul  de  Sac  de  la  ditte  prairie  du  pond.  Conformement  a 
leur  quantite  de  terre,  Et  que  toutes  les  autres  qui  reste  Seront 
tire  au  sort  telle  quil  a  Ete  cy  devant  Expliquee  Et  que  tant  qu'au 
reste  de  la  prairie  Sur  la  Droitte  de  la  ditte  Coule  des  liar  La 
ditte  Cour  au  nom  des  habitant,  cela  Sont  reserve  pour  le  pai- 
age  de  Leurs  Animaux  La  Borne  de  chaque  terres  Courant  Du 
mississipy  au  Cotte,  et  que  Si  par  la  Suitte  il  Se  presentoit  quel 
qu'autre  habitant  qui  voulussent  avoir  des  terres  Et  poursuivres 
plus  loins,  il  Seront  oblige  de  Suivre  La  Ligne  Directe  de  la 
Cloture  moyenant  que  le  Cotte  de  la  ditte  CouUe  des  liar  demeu- 
ra  toujour  pour  Comune  aux  animaux  Et  quapres  touttes  Cloture 
de  terre  Faites  Celle  qui  resteront  Sera  partage  En  Comun  a 
chaque  habitant  qui  auront  prix  des  terre  dans  laditte  prairie 

1  Chi.  Hist.  Soc,  Cah.  Rec,  original  manuscript.     Transcription  by  the  editor. 


ORDINANCE,  JUNE,  1783  565 

Ordinance  of  the  Court  of  Cahokia,  June  ii,  1783.^ 
The  year,  1783,  the  eleventh  day  of  the  month  of  June,  in  virtue 
of  the  Court,  held  this  day  in  the  name  of  the  public  to  determine 
the  amount  of  land  which  remains  to  be  taken  up  in  the  Prairie 
du  Pont,  appropriate  for  cultivation, ^  it  has  been  decided  by  the 
said  Court  that  there  be  made  a  census  of  the  citizens,  giving 
them  the  preference  over  all  others,  and  that,  thereafter,  there 
be  set  aside  the  amount  of  land,  which  can  be  taken  up  without 
encroaching  on  the  ground  which  it  has  been  agreed  to  reserve  for 
the  commons;  and  thereafter  that  the  said  common  fence  shall  be 
made  to  pass  behind  the  ground  belonging  to  Joseph  Maisonville 
and  to  join  there  the  gully  of  limestone  along  which  the  said  fence 
shall  run  up  to  Butau's  point  and  from  there  running  to  the  point 
of  woods  of  the  Big  Hill,  in  case  there  are  found  sufficient  inhabi- 
tants to  take  up  the  land  as  far  as  that;  and  if  not,  the  fence  shall 
stop  at  the  end  of  the  last  land  surveyed  and  taken  up  by  the  said 
inhabitants.  And  it  has  been  furthermore  agreed  that,  since  some 
of  the  said  lands  are  not  as  desirable  in  respect  to  area  as  others, 
there  should  be  tickets  which  shall  be  drawn  by  lot,  and  that 
each  who  shall  draw  his  ticket  shall  be  compelled  to  make  his 
fence  in  the  order  of  his  number;  that  is  to  say  they  shall  begin  the 
said  fences  at  the  end  of  that  belonging  to  the  inhabitants  who  have 
already  cultivated  land  in  the  cul  de  sac  of  the  said  Prairie  du  Pont 
and  build  them  according  to  the  amount  of  their  land;  and  that 
the  other  tickets  which  remain  shall  be  drawn  by  lot  in  the  manner 
it  has  been  herebefore  explained.  And  in  regard  to  the  rest  of  the 
prairie  on  the  right  of  the  said  limestone  gully,  the  said  Court  in  the 
name  of  the  inhabitants  has  reserved  that  for  the  pasturage  of  their 
animals,  the  limit  of  each  land  extending  from  the  Mississippi  to 
the  bluffs,  and,  if  hereafter  there  should  present  themselves  other 
inhabitants  who  wish  to  have  lands  and  to  go  on  farther,  they  shall 
be  obliged  to  follow  the  direct  line  of  the  fence,  on  condition  that 
the  side  of  the  said  limestone  gully  shall  remain  always  a  commons 
for  the  animals;  and  it  has  been  decided  that  after  all  enclosures 
of  land  have  been  made,  that  which  remains  shall  be  divided 

2  See  supra  pp.  153,  isq. 


566  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

du  pond  Car  ainsi  a  Et^  Convenu  Et  accord^  fait  Et  pass^  aux 
Cahos  Ian  Et  Jour  que  dessu  Etant  Signd 
sa  sa 

Antoine  +  Lamarche  L  +  Lebrun 

marque  marque 

sa  sa 

Jos^  +  Bellefeuil  fr  +  Couri^ 

marque  marque 

pierre  quenel 

F  Saucier  Greffier 

Inhabitants  of  Cahokia  to  Congress,  November  io,  1784. 
Etrait  du  Regis  du  Greffe  des  Illinois  En  la  Ville  des  Kaskaskias 
A  L'honorable  Congres. 
Messieurs — 
Cest  avec  un  Vray  plaisir  que  nous  habitant  des  Cahokias  et 
des  Villages  d'alentoure,  nous  avons  apris  que  par  un  acte  de 
L'assemblee  de  la  Virginie  du  20  Janvier  1781.  nous  somes 
tombe  Entierrement  sous  la  Juridictions  de  Votre  honorable 
Corps,  dans  L'esperance  que  nous  somes  que  vous  nous  donner^ 
les  secours  dont  nous  avons  Besoin,  et  accorderez  la  Joliissance 
de  nos  Enciennes  Loix,  privilege  et  Coutume,  et  que  comme  sujet 
ameriquain  nous  jouirons  des  memes  avantage  que  tous  les  autres 
habitant  Jouissent;  nous  Etant  la  moyenne  partie  de  nous  autres 
porte  Volontairement  dans  toutes  les  Entreprise  qui  se  sont  forme 
contre  Lennemis  Comuns;  et  meme  fort  souvent  Expose  nos 
families  a  la  brutalitee  des  Sauvages  En  nous  Eloignant  delle 
et  nous  Etant  aussy  privee  du  necessaire  pour  Contribuer  a 
lEntretien  des  troupes  qui  on  et^  Envoye  parmis  nous,  et  ces  dans 
des  tems  que  nos  recolte  ont  tout  a  fait  manque,  tant  par  les  de- 
bordement  du  Mississipi  que  par  les  incurtion  que  faisoient  les 
Sauvages  sur  nos  terres,  nous  avons  Enfin  dans  toutes  les  occas- 
sions  montree  un  vray  Zelle  pour  la  deffence  de  la  libert^e;  cest 
pour  quoi  nous  Esperons,  Recevior  Les  Benefices  de  nos  peine s 
et  que  Vous  aurez  Egards  aux  demandes  que  nous  faisont,  et 
qui  ne  sont  que  trop  Justes  pour  nous  En  faire  douter  la  reussites. 


MEMORIAL,  NOVEMBER,  1784  567 

among  all  the  inhabitants  who  shall  have  taken  up  land  in  the  said 
Prairie  du  Pont;  for  so  it  has  been  agreed  and  granted.  Made 
and  passed  at  Cahokia  the  year  and  day  as  above,  there  having 
signed, 

his  his  his 

Antoine  +  Lamarche        L.  +  Lebrun  Joseph  +  Bellefeuil 

mark  mark  mark 

Pierre  Quenel. 
F.  Saucier,  Clerk. 

Inhabitants  of  Cahokia  to  Congress,  November  10,  1784.^ 
Extract  of  the  Registers  of  the  Record-Office  of  the  Illinois  in 
the  Town  of  Kaskaskia.^ 
To  the  Honorable  Congress. 
Sirs : — 

It  is  with  a  true  pleasure  that  we,  the  inhabitants  of  Cahokia 
and  of  the  surrounding  villages,  have  learned  that  by  an  act  of  the 
assembly  of  Virginia  of  the  20th  of  January,  1 781,  we  have  fallen 
entirely  under  the  jurisdiction  of  your  honorable  body;  for  we 
hope  that  you  will  give  us  the  assistance  which  we  need,  and  grant 
us  the  enjoyment  of  our  former  laws,  privileges  and  customs,  and 
that  as  American  subjects  we  shall  enjoy  the  same  advantages  as 
the  other  inhabitants  enjoy;  for  we  have  borne  voluntarily  our 
proportional  share  in  all  the  enterprises,  which  have  been  formed 
against  the  common  enemy,  and  even  very  often  exposed  our  fami- 
lies to  the  brutality  of  savages  by  going  far  from  them,  and  we  have 
often  been  deprived  of  the  necessities  in  order  to  contribute  to  the 
support  of  the  troops  who  have  been  sent  among  us ;  and  this  at  a 

1  Papers  of  the  Old  Congress,  XLI.,  V.,  115,  a  copy  by  the  clerk  of  the  Kaskaskia  court. 
The  transcripts  from  the  Papers  0}  the  Old  Cotigress,  printed  in  this  voUime,  were  made  under 
the  direction  of  the  staff  of  the  Bureau  of  Hist.  Research  of  Carnegie  Institution,  and  were 
collated  a  second  time  by  Dr.  J.  Franklin  Jameson. 

2  The  petition  was  drawn  up  by  the  inhabitants  of  Cahokia  in  1784,  but  the  copy  which 
reached  Congress  was  made  by  the  Kaskaskia  clerk,  which  accounts  for  certain  peculiarities 
of  spelling.  Labuxiere,  the  clerk  at  Cahokia,  who  wrote  the  original  petition,  makes  a  final 
s  which  looks  like  a  straight  line,  and  this  has  been  read  by  the  clerk  of  Kaskaskia  as  the  letter 
t.  There  are  other  errors  which  can  be  accounted  for  in  a  similar  way,  as,  for  instance,  the 
spelling  of  the  signatures.  Also,  the  clerk  of  Kaskaskia  has  added  a  paragraph  to  make  it 
appear  that  the  Cahokians  united  with  the  Kaskaskians  in  denouncing  John  Dodge.  The 
Caliokians  intrusted  the  original  petition  to  Major  Lebrun,  but  he  was  killed  before  he  reached 
the  Ohio  river.  In  1786  the  people  of  Kaskaskia  sent  a  copy  of  it  with  a  petition  of  their 
own  to  Congress.     See  Introduction,  pp.  cxxix.,  cxxx. 


568  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS    • 

Premierement  que  Vous  nous  accordie  le  droit  de  Choisir 
parmie  nous  les  personnes  les  plus  Eclaires  pour  Magistrat  qui 
jouront  de  leurs  places  quautant  quil  metriteront  la  Confiance  du 
peuple,  et  que  En  Gas  de  mal  Versation  nous  ayont  aussy  le  meme 
droit  de  les  deplacer  pour  En  nomer  dautres,  et  que  tous  les  habi- 
tants qui  Viendront  setablire  parmis  nous  soient  obliger  de  ce 
Conforme  aux  Loix  qui  sont  deja  Etablie  et  sous  les  quelles  nous 
avons  et  Esperons  Vivre  En  Paix. 

^eme — £^  ^^^  dsiiis  toutes  les  causses  de  consequence  ou  le  bien 
etre  de  quelque  particulier  se  trouveray  tout  a  fait  Engage,  nous 
ayons  outre  notre  Judicature  un  Endroit  ou  nous  puissions  faire 
appelle  des  Sentence  que  un  de  ces  particulier  ne  Croiroit  pas 
avoir  ete  Entendue  suivant  toute  la  Justice  quil  avoit  lieu  dattendre, 
mais  que  le  nombre  de  ces  Causses  soient  reduite  a  celle  que  vous 
croire  absolument  liecessaire  pour  le  bien  aitre  de  Lendroit  et 
que  les  places  des  forts  ne  soient  aliener  a  aucun  particulier,  com- 
me  actuellement  Ledit  sieur  John  Dodge  posede  une  place  dun 
fort  et  que  les  terraces  sont  toutes  faites  depuis  le  terns  que  le 
Roy  de  france  posedoit  la  CoUonie  des  Illinois  qui  est  la  deffence  du 
Vilage  de  la  Ville  des  Kaskaskias. 

^eme — j)ans  lEsperence  que  nous  sommes  quune  fois  le  Bon 
ordre  Etablie  parmis  nous,  devoir  Venir  tous  les  habitant  qui 
Ennuyer  de  ce  Voir  Expose  a  toute  Sortes  de  danger  se  sont 
Retire  sur  la  partie  Espagnolle  outre  cela  les  avantage  qu'offre 
la  fertilite  de  nos  terres  a  ceux  qui  y  Viendront  cy  Etablir  nous 
Soiteriont  que  vous  Voulusies  bien  Enpecher  Labus  qui  ce  fait 
generalement  dans  tous  les  nouveaux  pays  ou  il  se  trouve  toujour 
quelque  particulier  qui  font  des  achats  de  quantite  de  terrin  sur 
les  quelles  ils  nont  aucun  intantion  de  setablir  que  celle  de  les 
Garder  quelque  annee  pour  Ensuite  les  revendre  a  des  prix 
Exhorbitant. 

^eme — Ayant  lieu  dattendre  que  Vous  nous  Enverrez  des  troupes 
dont  nous  avons  besoins  pour  la  surt^  et  la  police  de  lendroit  nous 
Esperont  que  Vous  Voudre  bien  pourvoire  a  ce  que  nous  ne  soiont 
plus  Expos6  au  meme  desordre  et  irregularity  que  nous  avons 

1  An  addition  to  the  original  petition  made  by  the  Kaskaskians. 


MEMORIAL,  NOVEMBER,  1784  569 

time  that  our  crops  have  completely  failed  both  on  account  of  the 
overflow  of  the  Mississippi  and  the  incursions  which  the  savages 
made  on  our  lands.  Finally  we  have  shown  on  all  occasions  a 
true  zeal  in  the  defence  of  liberty.  This  is  why  we  hope  to  re- 
ceive the  advantages  of  our  labors  and  that  you  will  give  heed  to 
the  petitions  which  we  make  and  which  are  only  too  just  to  cause 
us  doubt  of  their  success. 

Firstly,  we  pray  that  you  grant  us  the  right  of  choosing  from 
among  ourselves  the  most  enlightened  persons  for  magistrates,  who 
shall  hold  their  places  as  long  as  they  merit  the  confidence  of  the 
people,  and  that  in  case  of  malversation  we  have  also  the  same 
right  of  displacing  them  in  order  to  name  others;  and  that  all  the 
persons  who  shall  come  to  settle  among  us  be  obliged  to  conform 
themselves  to  the  laws  which  are  already  established  and  under 
which  we  have  and  hope  to  live  in  peace. 

Secondly,  we  pray  that,  for  all  the  important  suits  in  which  the 
well-being  of  some  individual  shall  be  entirely  at  stake,  we  have, 
besides  our  judicature,  a  place  to  which  we  can  make  appeal  from 
the  judgments  when  one  of  these  individuals  believes  that  he  has 
not  been  heard  according  to  the  full  justice,  which  he  had  the  right 
to  expect;  that  the  number  of  these  suits  be  reduced  to  that  which 
you  shall  believe  absolutely  necessary  for  the  well-being  of  the 
place;  and  that  the  sites  of  the  forts  be  not  alienated  to  any  indi- 
vidual, as  now  the  said  M.  John  Dodge  possesses  a  site  of  a  fort, 
the  earth-works  of  which  have  been  all  built  since  the  time  when 
the  king  of  France  possessed  the  colony  of  the  Illinois  and  which 
are  the  defence  of  the  village  of  the  town  of  Kaskaskia.^ 

Thirdly,  on  account  of  the  hope,  which  we  have,  that  once  good 
order  is  established  among  us,  there  are  bound  to  come  back  all 
the  inhabitants  who,  wearied  with  seeing  themselves  exposed  to 
all  kinds  of  danger,  have  withdrawn  to  the  Spanish  parts,  and 
furthermore  on  account  of  the  advantages  which  the  fertility  of  our 
lands  offers  to  those  who  shall  come  here  to  settle,  we  desire  that 
you  will  hinder  the  abuse  which  generally  occurs  in  all  new  coun- 
tries, where  there  are  always  some  individuals  who  make  purchases 
of  large  tracts  of  land  on  which  they  have  no  intention  of  settling, 


570  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

deja  Essuiez  d'elle,  quil  ne  soiet  plus  aux  pouvoir  du  Comandant 
de  cette  troupe  de  prendre  par  force  chez  labitant  ce  quil  croira 
avoir  besoin  que  cette  effet  vous  Voulissiez  bien  autorise  un 
quelquun  pour  regler  les  Enciens  Compte  de  ce  que  les  habitant 
ont  deja  fournie,  et  que  cette  meme  personne  ou  un  autre  soient 
aussy  a  meme  de  satisfaire  soit  En  argent  ou  billet  de  Credit  les 
habitant  quil  lui  fourniront  des  provisionts  pour  la  troupe  et  quen 
cas  quil  Vienent  a  manquer  de  quel  que  necessaire  que  Lofhcier 
comandant  soient  obliger  davoir  recour  aux  Magistrat  de  L'en- 
droit  qui  se  serviront  des  moyens  les  plus  prond  et  les  plus  satis- 
fesant  aux  particuliers  pour  leurs  [procurer]  ce  quils  auroient 
besoint. 

^eme — Qommc  ayant  parmis  nous  differentes  personnes  qui  par 
les  Correspondances  qu'il  Entretiennes  avec  les  sujets  du  Roy 
d'anglettere  dans  [tint?]  du  Cotte  de  Michilimakina  et  du  detroit 
et  autre  places  aux  prejudice  de  notre  comerce  ainsy  qu'une  Bende 
de  mauvais  sujet  qui  sasemble  et  tienne  des  discours  avec  les  sujet 
du  Roy  d'anglettere  contre  les  Etats  unies  et  qui  insinue  dans  les 
Esprits  foible  que  le  Roy  d'anglettere  prendra  possetion  de  cette 
Colonie  c'est  ce  qui  met  le  trouble  parmie  les  nations  Sauvages  et 
nous  Expose  Journellement  dans  le  perille  et  Lorsque  Voyant  une 
Justice  Etablie  Enpecheroit  tous  les  cabales  de  sa  troupie  nous 
Eviteroit  tous  dangers. 

^eme — Pg^r  dcmicr  demande  que  nous  regardont  comme  Grace 
special,  nous  Esperont  que  le  Congre  aura  Egards  que  depuis 
plusieurs  ann^es  consequitive  nous  avons  Etee  Expose  a  manquer 
de  tous  necessaire  tant  par  le  debordement  que  le  Misissipy  a  fait 
sur  les  terres  que  nous  avions  conjointement  choisy  et  que  par 
I'inquietude  que  nous  a  toujours  causse  les  nations  Sauvages  qui 
nous  ont  obliger  a  abandoner  les  Etablissement  que  nous  avions 
deja  faite  ce  que  nous  oblige  de  vivre  tres  retirees  nous  Esperont 
que  vous  voudre  Bien  nous  accorder  quel  qu'annee  frenche  de 
taxe  pour  nous  remettre  dans  un  Etat  a  pouvoir  vivre  et  soutenir 
notre  famelle,  et  que  lors  que  nous  seront  obliger  dans  payer  Vous 
nous  accordier  le  droit  Entre  nous  des  personnes  qui  prennent 

^  The  meaning  is  not  clear,  since  the  paragraph  was  not  finished . 


MEMORIAL,  NOVEMBER,  1784  571 

but  that  of  holding,  them  some  years  in  order  to  sell  them  after- 
wards at  an  exorbitant  price. 

Fourthly,  since  we  have  reason  to  expect  that  you  will  send 
troops,  of  whom  we  have  need  for  the  safety  and  the  police  of  the 
place,  we  hope  that  you  will  provide  for  this,  that  we  are  no  longer 
exposed  to  the  same  disorder  and  irregularity  that  we  have  already 
suffered  from  them;  that  it  be  no  longer  in  the  power  of  the  com- 
mander of  these  troops  to  take  by  force  from  the  houses  of  the  in- 
habitants what  he  shall  believe  he  has  need  of;  that  for  this  pur- 
pose you  will  authorize  some  one  to  settle  the  old  accounts  for  the 
supplies  which  the  inhabitants  have  already  furnished,  and  that 
this  same  person  or  another  be  also  authorized  to  satisfy  either 
in  gold  or  credit-notes  the  inhabitants  who  shall  furnish  him 
provisions  for  the  troops;  and  that  in  case  he  happens  to  lack 
any  necessity,  the  officer  in  command  be  obliged  to  have  recourse 
to  the  magistrates  of  the  place,  who  shall  use  the  most  prompt 
means  and  the  most  satisfactory  to  the  individuals  to  obtain  for 
him  what  he  needs. 

Fifthly,  since  we  have  among  us  several  persons  who  through 
the  correspondence  which  they  keep  up  with  the  subjects  of  the 
king  of  England  both  from  Michillimackinac  and  Detroit  and 
other  places  to  the  prejudice  of  our  commerce;  and  also  a  band 
of  worthless  fellows  who  assemble  with  the  subjects  of  the  king  of 
England  and  make  speeches  against  the  United  States  and  who 
are  instilling  into  the  minds  of  the  feeble  spirits  the  belief  that  the 
king  of  England  will  take  possession  of  this  colony,  that  is  what 
makes  the  trouble  among  the  savage  tribes  and  exposes  us  daily 
to  peril ;  and  when  a  justice  is  seen  to  be  established,  it  would  pre- 
vent all  the  intrigues  and  by  its  troops  spare  us  all  danger.^ 

Sixthly,  for  a  last  petition,  which  we  regard  as  a  special  grace, 
we  hope  that  Congress  will  consider  that  for  several  consecutive 
years  we  have  suffered  from  a  lack  of  all  necessities  both  on  ac- 
count of  the  inundation  of  the  Mississippi  on  the  lands  which  we 
have  conjointly  chosen  and  because  of  the  disturbance  which  has 
been  caused  by  the  savage  tribes,  who  have  obliged  us  to  abandon 
the  settlements  which  we  have  already  made,a  fact  which  compels 


572 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


connoissance  de  ce  qu'un  chaqu'un  possede  pouront  avec  plus 
dequitter  juger  de  ce  que  chaque  particulier  Doit  payer  nous  avont 
esperer  que  nos  demande  Vous  pareteront  Juste  pour  doutter 
d'un  seule  moment  que  Vous  ne  nous  les  acordier  pas. 

M^  Le  Major  Le  Brun  de  Belle  Court,  porteure  de  la  presente 
cera  a  meme  de  vous  donner  un  Etat  sirconstencier  de  notre  Situa- 
tion actuelle  et  nous  nous  reposont  Entierrement  que  Vous  Voudre 
bien  Ecouter  nos  demandes  et  nous  somes  tres  Respectueusements 

MESSIEURS 

Vos  tres  humbles  et 
aux  Cakokias  aux  Illinois  tres  obeissants  les 


ce  lo  9 


bre 


1784  Supliants  soussign^s 

Sign^  sur  la  minutte 
Jean  B^^.  LaCroix:     Dubuque 


Calarie  A:Pelletier 

f^  Courrier: 

S.  LeCompte: 

Bray 

A:  armant     dupuis 

P.  Martin: 

J.  Jervais: 

P.  roy 

J.  Cecire      chenier 

C.  Lefevre: 

S.  Pillet:        S. 

lebrun 

J  B^^  Dumay 

J  Bissonette 

Pi :  Poupart 

Charle  Cadron 

f.  Gramont: 

B^e  Baron 

P:  Chevallier 

P:  Daurion: 

B*«  alarie.     A: 

:  Beron 

A.  Jerardin 

R.WsiUs  [Watts?] 

E.  Bouvet: 

A.  Lamarche. 

aim^  Compte 

J.  Roussard 

B^e  Saussier 

La  Bruyer 

M:  Saussier: 

f:  Saussier 

J.  Marois 

S:  ChateUe. 

B^e   Merier 

Germain 

A.  Boyer. 

J.  BelleCourt 

gagner 

N.  Canada     thimotd  de  Montbrun 

Comandant 

Ordinance  of  the  Magistrates  of  Cahokia,  August  28, 1785. 
Nous  Antoine  Girardin  Commandant  au  poste  des  Cahos  Et 
Jean  Bte  LaCroix  president  et  magistrat  au  district  dud*  poste. 
Etant  necessaire  de  remedier  au  Brigendage  Et  vol  qui  se  Com- 

1  Chi,  Hist.  Soc,  Cah.  Rec,  original  manuscript.    Transcription  by  the^editor, 


ORDINANCE,  AUGUST,  1785  573 

us  to  live  very  secludedly ;  and  therefore  we  hope  that  you  will 
grant  us  freedom  from  taxation  for  some  years  so  that  we  may  put 
ourselves  in  a  condition  to  be  able  to  live  and  support  our  families ; 
and  that  when  we  are  obliged  to  pay  taxes,  you  will  grant  us 
the  right  [of  choosing]  from  among  ourselves  persons  who  know 
what  each  possesses  and  can  with  more  equity  judge  what  each 
individual  ought  to  pay.  We  hope  that  our  petitions  will  appear 
to  you  so  just  that  there  will  be  no  doubt  for  a  single  moment  of 
your  granting  them  to  us. 

Major  Lebrun  de  Belcour,  bearer  of  the  present,  will  be  able 
to  give  you  a  circumstantial  statement  of  our  present  condition ; 
and  we  fully  trust  that  you  will  listen  to  our  petitions  and  we  are 
very  respectfully, 

Sirs, 
Your  very  humble  and  obedient  petitioners,  undersigned. 

At  Cahokia  in  the  Illinois,  this  loth  of  November,  1784. 

Signed  on  the  record 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix.  Dubuque. 
C.  Alarie.     A.  Pelletier.     Fr.  Courier.     L.  Lecomte.     Brady.  [?] 
A.  Harmand.       Dupuis.       P.  Martin.       J.  Gervais.       P.  Roy. 
J.  Cesirre.       Chenier.       C.  Lefevre.  L.  Pillet.      L.  Lebrun. 

J.  Bte.  Dumay.  J.  Bissonette.  P.  Poupar. 

Charles  Cadron.  F.  Grandmont.  Bte.  Baron. 

P.  Chevalier.  P.  Dorion.  Bte.  Alarie.  A.  Baron. 

A.  Girardin.  E.  Bouvet.  A.  Lamarche. 

R.  Watts  [?]  J.  Roussard.  Bte.  Saucier. 

Aim^  Compte.  M.  Saucier.  F.  Saucier. 

Labruyer.  L.  Chatel.  Bte.  Mercier. 

J.  Marois.  A.  Boyer.  J.  Belcour. 

Germain.  N.  Canada. 

Gagne.  Thimothe  de  Monbreun,  Commandant. 

Ordinance  of  the  Magistrates  or  Cahokia,  August  28, 1785.^ 

We,  Antoine  Girardin,  Commandant  at  the  post  of  Cahokia, 
and  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  President  and  Magistrate  in  the  district 
of  the  said  post: 

Since  it  is  necessary  to  remedy  the  brigandage  and  theft,  which 


574  ILLINOIS  fflSTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

metent  tant  de  Nuit  que  de  jour  dans  les  champs  Ensemancds  et 
ciiltives  en  Bled  froment,  Mahis,  Poids,  feves,  citrouilles  melons  et 
autres  legumes,  ainsi  que  dans  les  verger  ou  jardins,  ou  ces  memes 
voleurs  desolent  et  Ruinent  entierement  le  travail  et  Labeurs  des 
Bons  Cito3'ens  qui  Se  donnent  toutes  les  peines  pour  avoir  leurs 
subsistances  et  jouir  du  fruit  de  leurs  travaux,  Etant  indispensable 
d'arreter  le  cour  dun  desordre  aussi  pernicieux  au  bien  public  il  est 
tres  expressement  deffendu  a  toutes  personnes  de  telle  qualite  que 
ce  puisse  etre  Soit  habitant  leurs  femmes  ou  enfant  et  esclaves  Aux 
voluntaires,  gabans,  gens  sans  aveu  ou  autres,  dentrer  dans  Les 
champs  Ensemances  de  grains  ou  legumes,  qui  ne  leur  apartien- 
dron  pas  ainsi  que  dans  les  vergers  ou  jardins  et  dy  voler  ny  prendre 
aucune  chose  que  ce  puisse  etre  a  peine  de  Cent  livres  demande 
aplicable  moitie  au  bien  public  de  lautre  moitie  au  denonciateur; 
d'etre  mis  huit  jours  aux  fers  et  promene  dans  le  village  des  Cahos 
avec  Les  marques  de  leur  vol  pendu  au  Col  pour  la  premiere  fois; 
Et  de  plus  grands  Chatiments  En  cas  de  residive.  il  est  aussi  tres 
expressement  deffendu  de  passer  a  traver  les  terres  Ensemancees 
Siot  a  chaval  ou  en  charete,  ordonnons  de  suivre  les  chemins  de 
ligne  a  peine  de  cinquante  livres  damande  contre  ceux  qui  con- 
treviendront  a  la  presente  ordonnance  Et  de  payer  le  domage,  Ce 
qui  Sera  Execute  Sans  moderation  Et  la  presente  sera  lue  et 
affichee  a  la  porte  de  cette  Eglise  Et  Enregistre  au  greffe  pour  y 
avoir  recour,  aux  cahos  le  28  aoust  1785. 

J.  B  H  LaCroix  presidant 

At  Girardin  Labuxiere  grefier 

Petition  of  La  Croix  in  regard  to  Trade,  October  29, 1785. 
A  Messieurs  Les  Magistrats  Et  respectable  Cour  du  district  des 

Cahos 
Messieurs 

Jean  B^^  LaCroix  a  Ihonneur  de  vous  exposer  que  pour  le 
Bien  public  la  Cour  luy  a  accorde  le  8.  de  Mars  1782  la  permission 
de  la  traite  avec  les  sauvages  dans  ce  village  aux  conditions  Ex- 
pliquees  dans  la  Sentence  de  ladite  Cour  rendue  cedit  jour  8.  mars 

1  Possibly  '^gabans"  is  a  corruption  of  vagabonds. 


CONCERNING  TRADE,  OCTOBER,  1785  575 

are  committed  as  well  by  night  as  by  day  in  the  fields,  sown  and  cul- 
tivated in  wheat,  corn,  peas,  beans,  pumpkins,  melons  and  other 
vegetables  and  also  in  the  orchards  or  gardens,  where  these  same 
thieves  spoil  and  ruin  utterly  the  work  and  labor  of  the  good  citi- 
zens who  give  all  their  toil  to  have  their  subsistence  and  to  enjoy 
the  fruit  of  their  labor;  since  it  is  indispensable  to  stay  the  course 
of  a  disorder  so  pernicious  to  the  public  welfare,  it  is  very  expressly 
forbidden  all  persons  of  what  quality  soever  whether  inhabitants, 
their  wives  or  wayward  children  and  slaves,  vagabonds,*  vagrants 
or  others,  to  enter  the  fields,  sown  with  grains  or  vegetables,  which 
do  not  belong  to  them,  and  also  the  orchards  and  gardens  and  to 
steal  or  take  anything  whatsoever  there,  on  pain  of  one  hundred 
livres  fine,  payable  half  to  the  public  treasury  and  the  other  half 
to  the  informer,  and  of  being  put  in  irons  for  eight  days  and  led 
about  in  the  village  of  Cahokia  with  the  marks  of  their  theft  hung 
around  their  neck,  for  the  first  offence,  and  of  greater  punishment 
in  case  of  repetition.  It  is  also  very  expressly  forbidden  to  pass 
across  the  sown  fields  either  on  horseback  or  in  a  wagon.  We 
command  that  the  line  of  the  roads  be  followed  on  pain  of  fifty 
livres  fine  against  those  who  shall  violate  the  present  ordinance 
and  of  paying  for  the  damage,  for  which  there  will  be  execution 
without  mitigation.  And  the  present  shall  be  read  and  posted  on 
the  door  of  this  church  and  registered  in  the  record-office  in  order 
that  there  may  be  recourse  thereto.     At  Cahokia,  August  28,  1785. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix,  President. 
Ant.  Girardin.  Labuxiere,  Clerk. 

Petition  or  La  Croix  in  Regard  to  Trade,  October  29, 1785.^ 

To  MM.  the  Magistrates  and  the  honorable  Court  of  the 
District  of  Cahokia. 
Sirs : — 

Jean  Bte.  LaCroix  has  the  honor  to  set  forth  to  you  that,  for 
the  public  good,  the  Court  granted  him  on  the  8th  of  March,  1782, 
permission  to  trade  with  the  savages  in  this  village  under  the  condi- 
tions declared  in  the  decree  of  the  said  Court,  rendered  the  said 

2  Chi.  Hist.  Soc,  Cah.  Rec.,  original  manuscript,  somewhat  damaged  by  folding.  Tran- 
scription by  the  editor. 


576  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

1782.  ledt  S^  LaCroix  na  point  Ete  trouble  jusqua  present  dans  Sa 
traite  mais  presentement  il  se  trouve  [en]  Cas  au  prejudice  Notable 
du  public  Et  de  Lexposant  qui  tend  a  faire  perir  Les  Citoyens  de 
faim  sur  tout  dans  d'aussi  grandes  Calamity  comme  nous  nous 
trouvous  presentement. 

Les  commerceans  Etranger  de  missilimakina  Sont  icy  Messieurs 
qui  Bien  loin  de  Se  Contanter  de  Lazile  que  nous  leur  donnons 
pour  vendre  leurs  marchandises  aux  francais  traitent  des  Sauvages 
qui  viennent  a  ce  vilage  toutes  les  douceurs  que  lesd^  sauvages 
aportent  Et  nous  otent  par  ce  moyens  les  faculte  de  pouvoir  vivre 
En  nous  survandant  ces  memes  danrees  de  traite  a  des  prix 
Exhorbitant  Et  En  En  faisant  des  amas  au  detriment  du  peuple  p^ 
le  transporter  hor  de  Lendroit  ou  Le  vendre  a  des  prix  plus 
honereux  au  public  comme  ces  commerceants  nont  aucun  droit  de 
traite  dans  ce  village  Et  que  si  nous  avons  quelque  douceur  a 
traiter  des  sauvages  .  .[MS.  torn].  .  Benefice  Nous  apartient  de 
droit  Et  non  a  des  Etranger  que  nous  soufr  [ons]  icy  par  Bienseance 
ayant  Ete  renvoyez  de  la  rive  Espagnole  il  nest  pas  juste  de  Nous 
laisser  Enlever  par  ces  memes  marchand  a  nos  yeux  ce  que  la 
providence  nous  offre  par  les  sauvages;  ce  qui  ces  marchands 
traitent  non  Seulement  des  marchandises  a  Nos  yeux  jusques  sur 
nos  foyer  mais  Encore  ce  qui  est  plus  pernici[eux]  de  la  boisson 
Et  soutent  les  sauvages  dans  un  temp  ou  on  ne  sauroit  Etre  trop 
Circonspect;  pour  Eviter  [les]  malheurs  qui  En  peuvent  resulter  je 
requiere  Messieurs  que  vous  ayez  la  bonte  de  me  Continuer  dans 
ma  traite  Et  quil  soit  fait  deffance  a  tous  Commerceants  Etranger 
de  Sy  immisser  a  lavenir  dans  ce  village  ni  dy  traiter  aucunne 
Chose  avec  les  sauvages  qui  y  viennent  a  peine  dune  amende 
telle  quil  vous  plaira  fixer  Et  de  Confiscation  de  ce  quils  auront 
traiter  sous  loffre  que  fait  lexposant  de  Se  Conformer  aux  Con- 
ditions de  la  Sentence  de  la  Cour  dud*  jour  8.  mars  1782.  Et  que 
cette  Branche  de  Commerce  nous  Soit  Conservee  dans  notre 
village  .  .  [MS  torn] .  .  aux  Etrangers  cest  a  quoy  je  Conclud  aux 
Cahosle  29,  8^^^  1785. 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

1  See  supra  pp.  125,  213. 

2  The  great  flood  of  1785. 


CONCERNING  TRADE,  OCTOBER,  1785  577 

day,  March  8,  1782.^  The  said  M.  LaCroix  has  not  been  troubled 
up  to  the  present  in  his  trading;  but  now  he  is  in  a  position  very 
prejudicial  to  the  public  and  to  the  petitioner  and  which  tends 
to  cause  the  citizens  to  perish  from  hunger,  especially  at  a  time 
of  such  great  calamity  as  we  find  ourselves  in  at  present.^ 

The  alien  merchants  of  Michillimackinac,  gentlemen,  are 
here  and,  far  from  contenting  themselves  with  the  asylum  which 
we  give  them  to  sell  their  merchandise  to  the  French,  they  are 
trading  with  the  savages,  who  come  to  this  village,  for  all  the 
goods  which  the  said  savages  bring  and  are  taking  from  us  in  this 
way  the  means  of  making  a  living,  since  they  overcharge  us  for 
these  same  commodities  of  trade  at  exorbitant  prices ;  and  to  the 
detriment  of  the  people  they  are  making  hords  of  the  goods  in 
order  to  transport  them  out  of  the  place  or  to  sell  them  at  prices 
most  burdensome  to  the  public.  Since  these  merchants  have  no 
right  of  trade  in  this  village  and  since,  if  we  have  some  goods  to 
trade  with  the  Indians,  [this]  advantage  should  belong  to  us  and 
not  to  strangers;  and  since  we  suffer  them  here  for  convenience, 
after  having  been  sent  away  from  the  Spanish  bank,  it  is  not  just 
in  us  to  permit  these  traders  to  carry  off  before  our  eyes  what 
Providence  offers  us  through  the  savages.  But  these  traders 
are  trading  before  our  eyes  and  up  to  our  very  doors  not  only  in 
merchandise  but  also  in  what  is  more  pernicious,  drink,  and  are 
favoring  the  savages  at  a  time  when  one  cannot  be  too  careful.  In 
order  to  avoid  the  evils  which  may  result  therefrom,  I  pray, 
gentlemen,  that  you  have  the  goodness  to  continue  me  in  my 
trading  right  and  that  all  alien  merchants  for  the  future  be  for- 
bidden to  participate  therein  in  this  village  or  to  trade  in  anything 
with  the  savages  who  come  here,  on  pain  of  a  fine,  such  as  it  shall 
please  you  to  fix,  and  of  confiscation  of  that  for  which  they  shall 
have  traded;  and  in  return  the  petitioner  oft'ers  to  conform  to 
the  conditions  of  the  decree  of  the  Court  of  the  said  8th  of  March, 
1782,  so  that  this  branch  of  commerce  be  preserved  for  us  in  our 
village  [and  not  pass]  to  aliens;  and  this  is  my  conclusion.  At 
Cahokia  October  29,  1785.  J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 

In  view  of  the  decree  rendered  by  the  Court  of  the  district 
March  8,  1782,  by  which  the  said  Court  granted  the  right  of  trade 


578  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Veu  la  Sentence  Rendue  par  la  Cour  du  district  le  8.  mars  1782 
par  laquelle  ladite  Cour  a  accorde  la  traite  des  sauvages  aud*  S^ 
jean  B^^  LaCroix  lequel  a  toujours  Exerce  ladite  traite  Sans'aucun 
Reproche  ni  plainte  de  personne  cest  pourquoy  la  Cour  assembl^e 
a  decide  Et  decide  par  la  presente  sentence  que  led*  S^  LaCroix 
Sera  continue  dans  ladite  traite  Exclusivement  a  tous  autres  pour 
le  Bien  public  de  ce  poste  Et  Sera  libre  de  traiter  Laudevie  aux 
sauvages  a  la  reserve  neantmoins  Et  Cas  tr^s  expressement  reserve 
quil  ne  poura  delivrer  laudevie  aux  sauvages  que  lors  quil  partiront 
de  ce  de  ce  [sic]  village  de  facon  quil  ne  Boivent  point  aud*  village 
Et  quil  nen  resulte  aucun  domage  Et  Sera  donne  une  personne  de 
Confiance  par  la  Cour  pour  veiller  a  ce  que  led*  S^  LaCroix  ne 
leur  donne  point  a  boire  Et  jusques  a  ce  que  les  sauvages  soit 
Conduit  avec  leurs  Boisson  a  une  lieues  hors  de  ce  village.  Et  led* 
S^  LaCroix  se  Conformera  a  toutes  les  Conditions  expliquees  En  la 
Sentence  de  permission  du  8.  mars  1782  Envers  le  public  def- 
fandons  tres  expressement  a  tous  commerceants  anglais  Etrangers 
Residants  depuis  peu  En  ce  poste  qui  nont  point  de  Sermant  de 
fidelite  aux  Etats  la  traite  de  Lau  devie  sous  tel  pretexte  que  ce  soit 
a  peine  de  Cent  livres  demande  Et  de  plus  grande  peine  En  Cas 
de  residive  nenten  .  .[-1/5.  torn].  .  Neantmoins  desroger  au  Com- 
merce libre  des  marchands  Etranger  pour  la  traite  Et  de 
.  .  [MS.  torn] .  .  des  marchandises  .  .  [MS.  torn] .  .  et  la  Cour  se 
reserve  En  cas  de  prejudice  au  public  de  reformer  la  presente 
permission  accordee  aud*  S^  LaCroix  dont  elle  prendra  Con- 
noissance  En  tems  et  lieux  si  les  Cas  La  requiere  Et  le  Con- 
tinuous dans  son  privilege  jusqua  Revocation  expresse  de 
Notre  part  deffendons  a  qui  que  ce  soit  de  Le  troubler,  ni 
inquieter  Et  la  Presente  Sera  lu  publice  et  affiche  demain 
dimanche  a  la  porte  de  cette  Eglise  a  lissue  de  la  messe 
dimanche  donne  par  nous  La  Cour  scant  par  M""^  j  B*^  du  Buque 
Charle  ducharme  fr.  Courier.  Et  thom  Bredy  ce  dernier  na  voulu 
signer  Et  les  autres  ont  signe  Et  aprouve  par  m^  trotier  com- 
mandant Le  29  8^^^  1785. 
[Signed] 

Ch  DuCharme  B  Dubuque        '  marque  de  fr  courie 

J  B  H  LaCroix  magistrat  + 


CONCERNING  TRADE,  OCTOBER,  1785  579 

with  the  savages  to  the  said  Jean  Bte.  LaCroix,  who  has  always 
exercised  the  said  right  of  trade  without  any  reproach  or  complaint 
from  any  one,  for  which  reason  the  Court  in  assembly  has  decided 
and  does  decide  by  the  present  decree  that  the  said  M.  LaCroix 
shall  be  continued  in  the  said  trading  privilege,  exclusive  of  all 
others,  for  the  public  good  of  this  post;  and  he  shall  be  free  to 
trade  in  liquor  with  the  savages  with  this  reservation  and  condi- 
tion, nevertheless,  expressly  reserved,  namely  that  he  can  only 
deliver  liquor  to  the  savages  when  they  shall  set  out  from  this 
village  and  so  that  they  do  not  drink  in  the  said  village  and  there 
results  no  damage  therefrom;  and  there  shall  be  appointed  by 
the  Court  a  trustworthy  person  to  see  to  it  that  the  said  M.  LaCroix 
does  not  give  them  anything  to  drink  and  that  the  savages  with 
their  drink  are  conducted  to  the  limits  outside  of  the  village.  And 
the  said  LaCroix  shall  conform  to  all  the  conditions  declared  in 
the  decree  of  permission  March  8,  1782.  In  regard  to  the  pubhc, 
we  forbid  very  expressly  all  English  merchants,  who  are  alien 
residents  for  a  short  time  in  this  post  and  have  not  taken  the  oath 
of  fidelity  to  the  states,  the  trade  in  liquor  under  any  pretext 
whatsoever  on  pain  of  one  hundred  livres  fine  and  of  greater 
punishment  in  case  of  repetition,  not  [intending],  however,  to 
detract  from  the  free  commerce  of  the  alien  traders  for  the  trade 
and  [Mss.  torn]  of  merchandise  [Mss.  torn].  And  the  Court 
reserves  to  itself,  in  case  of  prejudice  to  the  public,  to  change  the 
present  permission  granted  to  the  said  M.  LaCroix,  of  which 
it  will  take  cognizance  in  time  and  place,  if  the  case  requires  it; 
and  we  continue  him  in  his  privilege  until  express  revocation  on 
our  part.  We  forbid  any  one  whomsoever  to  trouble  or  disturb 
him.  And  the  present  shall  be  read,  published  and  posted  to- 
morrow, Sunday,  on  the  door  of  this  church  at  the  close  of  mass. 
Given  by  us,  the  court  in  session,  J.  Bte.  Dubuque,  Charles 
DuCharme,  Fr.  Courier  and  Tom  Brady;  the  last  has  not  wished 
to  sign  and  the  others  have  signed;  and  it  was  approved  by  M. 
Trottier  October  29,  1785. 

[Signed]      Ch.  DuCharme.  B.  Dubuque 

J.  B.  H.  LaCroix.  Mark  of  Fr.  Courier 

Magistrate. 


58o  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Veu  et  aprouv^e  par  moi  major  commandant 

fr.  trottier 
a  que  Cette  Condissionte  Labuxiere  greffier 

Le  present  Privilege  EnnuU^  par  la  Sentence  de  ce  jour  sur  les 
registres  des  audiences  aux  cahos  le  12  9^^®  1788 

Labuxiere  grefier 

Inhabitants  of  Cahokia  to  Congress,  July  15,  1786. 

Messieurs  des  Etats  unis  de  L'amerique  tenant  Le  Congre. 
Messieurs: 

C'est  avec  la  plus  sensible  peine  que  les  habitants  des  cahos 
aux  Ilinois  se  trouvent  reduit  a  vous  porter  les  justes  plaintes 
et  vous  demander  votre  protection  contre  entreprises  que  M^.  Dor- 
sey  pentacoste  veut  former  sur  terres  aux  cahos  et  les  desposseder 
d'un  Bien  qui  leu[r]  apartient  legitimement  et  dont  ils  sont  en 
pocession  eu[x]  et  leurs  peres  depuis  pres  dun  Ciecle. 

La  prairie  du  pont  a  apartenu  de  tous  tems  aux  habitants, 
tant  pour  la  cultiver  sil  en  avoit  Besoin  q[ue]  pour  servir  de  Com- 
muns  a  leurs  Bestiaux  sans  laquelle  il  leur  seroit  impossible 
d'En  Elever  d'aucune  espece. 

Le  S^.  Gibault  cure  desservant  la  cure  des  Caskakias  a  20 
lieues  de  notre  village  s'est  arroge  le  pouvoir  secret  d'ozer 
disposer  de  cette  prairie  En  la  Concedant  a  M^  Le  Colonel 
Clark  qui  a  revendu  cette  meme  concession  a  M^  Pentecoste 
qui  aujourdhuy  veut  s'en  emparer  et  en  deposseder  les  habi- 
tants 

il  n'a  jamais  ete  au  pouvoir  d'aucun  Eclesistique  des  ilinois 
de  disposer  du  Bien  des  Sujets.  les  loix  ni  leur  Etat  ne  leur  ont 
jamais  donne  un  pouvoir  si  arbitraire,  Bien  loin  d'y  avoir  e<i 
aucunme  authorite  ni  droit,  leur  devoir  a  Ete  restraint  a  dire  la 
messe  et  a  recevoir  la  retribution  qui  leur  revenoit  pour  y  cele- 
brer  le  service  divin  Et  jamais  les  pretres  de  ces  Endroits  N'ont 
eu  la  permission  ni  le  privilege  de  donner  des  concessions,  ce 
privilege  n'a  anciennement  apartenu  qu'aux  Commandants  Et 

^  Papers  oj  the  Old  Congress,  Ixviii.,  ST.     Original  manuscript. 

2  The  concession  was  made  by  Father  Gibault  to  Stephen  Trigg,  one  of  Clark's  officers, 
on  April  21,  1779,  and  transferred  by  the  latter  to  Clark  on  May  6  of  the  same  year.  Both 
deeds  were  registered  at  Kaskaskia  instead  of  at  Cahokia. — Kas.  Rec,  Court  Record.     The 


MEMORIAL,  JULY,  1786  581 

Seen  and  approved  by  me,  Major  Commandant, 

Fr.  Trottier 
a  que  cette  Condissionte  [  ?]  Labuxiere,  Clerk. 

The  present  privilege  annulled  by  the  decree  of  this  day 
entered  on  the  registers  of  the  audiences  at  Cahokia,  November 
12,  1788.  Labuxiere,  Clerk. 

Inhabitants  of  Cahokia  to  Congress,  July  15,  1786.^ 

Gentlemen  of  the  United  States  of  America  holding  Congress. 
Sirs:— 

It  is  with  the  deepest  pain  that  the  inhabitants  of  Cahokia 
find  themselves  compelled  to  bring  their  just  complaints  to  you 
and  to  demand  your  protection  against  projects  which  M. 
Dorsey  Pentecoste  is  devising  with  respect  to  lands  at  Cahokia  and 
by  which  he  would  dispossess  them  of  property  which  belongs  to 
them  legally  and  of  which  they  have  been  in  possession,  them- 
selves and  their  fathers,  since  almost  a  century. 

The  Prairie  du  Pont  has  belonged  from  all  time  to  the  inhabi- 
tants, both  for  the  purpose  of  cultivating  it,  if  there  was  need 
thereof,  or  to  serve  for  commons  for  their  animals,  without  which 
commons  it  would  have  been  impossible  to  raise  any  kind  of 
animals. 

M.  Gibault,  curey  serving  the  parish  of  Kaskaskia  20  leagues 
from  our  village,  has  dared  to  arrogate  secretly  the  power  of 
disposing  of  this  prairie  by  conceding  it  to  Colonel  Clark,  who  has 
resold  this  same  concession  to  M.  Pentecoste,  who  to-day  wishes 
to  take  possession  and  dispossess  the  inhabitants  thereof. ^ 

It  has  never  been  in  the  power  of  any  ecclesiastic  of  the  Illinois 
to  dispose  of  the  property  of  the  subjects.  Neither  the  laws  nor 
their  state  have  ever  given  them  a  power  so  arbitrary.  So  far 
from  having  had  therein  any  authority  or  right,  their  duty  has 
been  limited  to  saying  the  mass  and  to  receiving  the  remuner- 
ation which  accrues  to  them  for  celebrating  divine  service;  and 
never  have  the  priests  had  the  permission  or  the  privilege  of  giving 
concessions.     This  privilege  has  formerly  belonged  to  the  com- 

land  commissioners  of  the  U.  S.  disallowed  Pentecoste's  claim,  because  Father  Gibault  had 
no  authority  to  alienate  the  lands  of  the  church,  and  was  expressly  prohibited  from  doing  so. 
— Amer.  State  Pap.,  Pub.  Lands,  ii.,  139. 


582  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

commissaire  des  lieux  lors  qu'ils  y  etoient  authorizes  par  le  Souv- 
erain  Et  jamais  aucun  pretre  ne  s  est  immisce  ni  n'a  oz^  prendre 
une  pareille  authorite. 

Le  S^  Gibault  sachant  quil  navoit  aucun  droit  ni  pouvoir  de 
concedder,  mais  pour  se  faire  un  merite  Et  tromper  la  bonne  foy 
de  M^  Clark  luy  a  fait  cette  consession  frauduleuse  Et  conti"e  la 
bonne  foy  publique.  aussi  en  a-t-il  garde  le  silence  Et  bien  [nen  ?] 
n'est  venu  a  la  Connoissance  des  habitans  jusqua  ce  jour,  dans 
la  Crainte  quil  avoit  sans  doute  quils  ne  luy  fassent  la  honte  Et 
la  confusion  d'avoir  trompe  Mr.  Clark  Et  En  meme  temps  voultj 
s'il  avoit  ete  En  son  pouvoir  deposseder  les  dits  habitants  de  leurs 
Biens  par  une  concession  aussi  vaine  que  tenebreuse  qu'il  a  donne 
secretement  au  Mr.  Clark  En  voulant  le  persuader  de  son  faux 
pouvoir. 

que  deviendroient  les  citoyens  de  cette  partie  si  des  trompe- 
ries  aussi  manifestes  et  aussi  scandaleuses  avoient  lieu  ou  seroit 
la  surete  publique  des  Biens  de  chaque  famille.  il  ny  en  auroit 
plus  aucunne  et  le  proprietaire  ne  pouroit  pas  sassurer  d'etre 
tranquille  sur  son  propre  foyer,  cette  Liberte  si  chere  N'en  seroit 
que  lombre. 

c'est  pour  prevenir  de  si  mauvais  dessein  Et  arreter  le  Cour 
des  Entreprises  que  le  S^  pentecoste  veut  former  sur  nos  Biens 
fonde  sur  ce  vain  titre  ou  dautres  quil  auroit  pu  surprendre  et 
obtenir  de  Nos  Siegneurs  du  Congre  a  nous  honereuses  et  pre- 
judiciables  que  nous  prenons  la  Liberte  de  Nous  adresser  Nos 
seigneurs  Et  Souverains  a  votre  tribunal,  pour  vous  suplier  de 
regarder  la  Concession  donnee  par  led*  S^  gibault  comme  une 
tromperie  manifeste  donnee  par  un  homme  non  titre  a  ce  sujet  Et 
qui  na  jamais  eu  aucun  pouvoir  sur  nos  Biens  la  declarer  nule 
Et  abuzive,  Renvoyer  M^  pentecoste  a  se  pourvoir  contre  M^  Le 
Colonel  Clark  Et  ce  dernier  contre  Gibault  qui  sera  tenu  de  nous 
Exiber  ses  pouvoirs  En  vertu  des  quels  il  veut  nous  despoceder  de 
nos  Biens  Et  terres  Et  des  quels  nous  sommes  En  pocession  depuis 
letablissement  des  cahos  qui  passe  plus  de  80,  ans:  pocessions  que 
ces  predecesseurs  et  meme  les  anciens  commandants  ont  toujours 
respectees. 


MEMORIAL,  JULY,  1786  583 

mandants  and  the  commissaries  of  the  places,  when  they  were 
authorized  thereto  by  the  sovereign;  and  never  has  any  priest 
interfered  or  dared  to  assume  such  an  authority. 

M.  Gibault,  knowing  that  he  had  no  right  nor  authority  to 
make  the  concession,  but  in  order  to  make  a  merit  and  to  deceive 
the  good  faith  of  M.  Clark,  has  made  this  concession  fraudulently 
and  against  the  public  good  faith.  Also  he  has  kept  silent  about 
it  (and  it  didn't  come  to  the  knowledge  of  the  inhabitants  until 
this  day)  on  account  of  the  fear,  which  he  undoubtedly  had,  that 
they  would  disgrace  and  confuse  him  with  having  deceived  M. 
Clark;  and,  at  the  same  time,  he  wished,  if  it  had  been  in  his 
power,  to  dispossess  the  said  inhabitants  of  their  property  by  a 
concession  as  vain  as  underhanded,  which  he  had  given  secretly  to 
M.  Clark,  because  he  wished  to  pursuade  him  of  his  false  power. 

What  would  become  of  the  citizens  of  this  part,  if  trickeries, 
so  manifest  and  so  scandalous,  were  allowed;  and  where  would 
be  the  public  surety  of  property?  There  would  no  longer  be 
any;  and  no  proprietor  could  be  assured  of  being  undisturbed 
in  his  own  home.     This  liberty,  so  dear,  would  be  only  its  shadow. 

It  is  to  anticipate  so  evil  a  purpose  and  to  stop  the  course  of 
the  attempts  which  M,  Pentecoste  wishes  to  make  on  our  property, 
which  attempts  rest  on  such  a  vain  title,  or  to  stop  other  conces- 
sions, burdensome  and  prejudicial  to  us,  which  he  may  undertake 
to  obtain  from  our  lords  of  Congress,  that  we  take  the  liberty,  our 
Lords  and  Sovereigns,  of  addressing  your  tribunal,  in  order  to 
pray  you  to  regard  the  concession,  made  by  the  said  M.  Gibault, 
as  a  manifest  fraud  and  as  given  by  a  man  not  empowered  in  this 
matter  and  who  has  never  had  power  over  our  property;  and  to 
declare  it  null  and  improper  and  to  dismiss  M.  Pentecoste  tQ» 
plead  against  Colonel  Clark  and  this  latter  against  Gibault, 
who  shall  be  held  to  show  us  his  powers,  by  virtue  of  which  he 
wishes  to  dispossess  us  of  our  property  and  lands,  which  we  have 
possessed  since  the  establishment  of  Cahokia,  which  is  more  than 
eighty  years;  possessions  which  his  predecessors  and  even  the 
former  commandants  have  always  respected. 

We  dare  to  hope,  sirs,  that  you  will  set  aside  and   annul  all 


584  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Nous  ozons  esperer  Messieurs  que  vous  voudrds  Bien  casser 
et  Ennuler  toutes  autres  concessions  au  permissions  que  le  S^ 
pentecoste  auroit  pii  obtenir  de  vous  tendentes  anous  desposseder  de 
nos  pocessions  et  quil  ne  pouroit  obtenir  plus  grande  quantity  de 
terres  que  celles  que  la  Cour  de  ce  district  luy  accordera  aux 
Endroit  qui  ne  seront  pas  Etablis  Et  qui  jusqua  present  nont  pas 
Ete  pris  par  personne,  cette  quantite  ne  pouvant  excedder 
dix  arpents  de  large  sur  la  Superficie  de  quatre  Cent  quarante 
arpents,  laquelle  quantite  de  terre  lui  sera  donn^e  aux  Endroits 
qui  ne  seront  prejudicia[ble]  a  personne. 

ci  inclus  Nos  Seigneurs  vous  trouveres  la  Copie  de  la  procura- 
tion que  le  chapitre  de  Canada  a  Envoy^  au  S^  gibault  dont 
1 'original  est  depose  au  greffe  du  district  des  cahos,  par  laquelle 
procuration  vous  veres  que  le  S''  Gibault  n'a  pu  ny  du  le  demem- 
brer  ny  Conceder  aucunne  partie  ni  portion  des  terres  et  Bien 
de  la  mission  des  Cahos  sans  lexpres  consentement  des  habitants 
dud^  lieu  a  qui  tons  ces  Biens  sont  transmis  pour  lEntretien  de 
Ladite  mission  ou  prestre  que  lesdits  habitants  voudront  y  Etab- 
lir.  Et  que  par  concequant  le  S^  gibault  n'ayant  jamais  des- 
servy  cette  cure  ny  a  Eu  aucun  droit  ny  pouvoir.  dailleur  on  ne 
Crain  pas  de  L'avancer  dans  le  temps  quil  a  donnee  cette  pre- 
tendue  Concession  secrette  et  hor  de  la  Connoissance  des  habi- 
tants il  etoit  interdit  par  ordre  de  Leveque  de  Canada  de  la 
quelle  interdiction  on  ignore  s'il  est  Encore  releve,  or  toute  inter- 
diction Ennule  tous  actes  Et  contracts  qu'il  auroit  pu  faire  pen- 
dant quelle  a  dure  et  par  concequant  tous  ses  pouvoirs  se  trou- 
voient  aneanty. 

Nous  vous  reiterons  Nos  Siegneurs  avec  tout  le  respect  et  la 
soumission  que  nous  devons  a  nos  Souverains  Et  avec  toute  la 
fidelite  que  nous  vous  avons  juree,  de  nous  accorder  la  justice 
que  nous  vous  demandons,  contre  toutes  les  Entreprises  du  S^ 
pentecoste  sur  nos  biens  terres  et  communes,  que  vous  ne  pouvez 
connoitre  par  vous  meme  a  moins  qu'une  personne  Eclairde  Et 
sans  partialite  ne  vous  en  face  un  fidel  raport.  c'est  En  conce- 
quance  que  nous  avons  charge  M^.  Gabriel  Cere  Negociant  des 
ilinois  porteur  de  ces  presentes  de  vous  donner  tous  les  Eclair- 


MEMORIAL,  JULY,  1786  585 

other  concessions  or  permissions,  which  M.  Pentecoste  may 
obtain  from  you,  which  tend  to  dispossess  us  of  our  possessions, 
and  consent  that  he  cannot  obtain  a  larger  amount  of  land  than 
that  which  the  Court  of  this  district  will  grant  him  in  places 
which  shall  not  be  settled  and  up  to  the  present  have  not  been 
taken  up  by  anyone,  such  concession  not  to  exceed  ten  arpents 
in  width  and  four  hundred  and  forty  arpents  in  area;  which 
amount  of  land  shall  be  given  to  him,  where  it  will  not  be  pre- 
judicial to  anyone. 

Enclosed  herewith,  our  Lords,  you  will  find  the  copy  of  the 
power  of  attorney  which  the  chapter  of  Canada  sent  to  M. 
Gibault,  the  original  of  which  is  deposited  at  the  office  of  the 
district  of  Cahokia,  from  which  power  of  attorney  you  will  see 
that  M.  Gibault  neither  could  nor  should  dismember  or  concede 
any  part  or  portion  of  the  lands  and  property  of  the  mission  of 
Cahokia  without  the  express  consent  of  the  inhabitants  of  the 
said  place,  to  whom  all  this  property  is  conveyed  for  the  main- 
tenance of  the  said  mission  or  priest,  that  the  said  inhabitants 
shall  wish  to  establish  here;  and  that  consequently  M.  Gibault, 
since  he  has  never  administered  this  cure,  has  had  no  right  nor 
power.  Besides  we  do  not  fear  to  advance  that,  at  the  time  when 
he  gave  this  pretended  concession  secretly  and  without  the  knowl- 
edge of  the  inhabitants,  he  was  interdicted  by  order  of  the  bishop 
of  Canada,  and  we  do  not  know  if  that  interdiction  is  yet  removed ; 
but  all  interdictions  annul  all  acts  and  contracts,  which  the  one, 
so  interdicted,  may  have  made  while  it  lasted;  and  consequently 
all  his  powers  are  annulled. 

We  ask  again  of  you,  our  Lords,  with  all  the  respect  and  sub- 
mission that  we  owe  to  our  sovereigns  and  with  all  the  fidelity 
which  we  have  sworn  to  you,  that  you  grant  us  the  justice,  for 
which  we  pray,  against  all  the  attacks  of  M.  Pentecoste  upon 
our  property,  lands  and  commons,  about  which  you  cannot  your- 
selves know,  unless  a  person,  informed  and  without  partiality, 
makes  to  you  a  faithful  report  thereof.  Therefore  we  have 
intrusted  M.  Gabriel  Cerr^,  merchant  of  the  lUinois,  and  bearer 
of  these  presents,  to  give  you  all  the  necessary  information  so 


586  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

cissements  necessaires  afin  de  nous  rendre  la  justice  que  de  Bons 
Et  fidels  sujets  doivent  atendre  de  leurs  souverains  pour  la  Con- 
servation de  nos  Biens  qui  sont  a  la  veille  d'Etre  en  proye  a  la 
voracite  du  S^  pentecoste,  avide  de  nous  depouiller  de  notre 
patrimoine  Et  nous  obliger  nous  et  nos  families  a  faire  un  deguer- 
pissement  de  tiranie  pour  nous  obliger  a  Chercher  un  azile  chez 
letranger  apres  avoir  Epuise  notre  sang  a  metre  nos  terres  En  valeur 
pour  sa  rapacite.  Nous  vous  suplions  de  nous  pardonner  si  nous 
nous  servons  de  ces  Expressions  La  lettre  quil  Ecrit  icy  nous  prouve 
assez  ses  intentions  de  la  quelle  nous  envoyons  copie  cy  jointe. 

Nous  vous  demandons  Nos  seigneurs  d'Etre  maintenus  dans 
toutes  nos  pocessions,  usages,  coutumes  Et  loix  anciennes  sans 
quaucunne  authorite  y  puisse  donner  ateinte  Et  que  nous  nayant 
pas  le  desplaisir  d'Etre  soumis  a  aucunne  autre  justice  des  ilinois 
connoissant  L'incapacite,  haine,  Et  partialite  des  sujets  qui 
pouroient  lexercer,  mais  de  Nous  donner  la  permission  de  nous 
gouverner  nous  memes  comme  nous  avons  toujours  fait. 

La  cour  de  ce  district  des  cahos  a  pris  sur  EUe  de  Conceder  a 
chaque  particulier  ameriquain  ou  autres  Nouvellement  arrivez 
En  ce  pays  Et  qui  veulent  sy  Etablir  dix  arpents  de  terre  de 
large,  sur  la  superficie  de  quatre  cent  quarante  arpents,  dans  notre 
district.  Nous  Nexedons  pas  cette  quantite  afin  de  menager  le  ter- 
rain pour  que  Chacun  puisse  En  avoir  et  nous  fortifier  par  le 
Nombre  d'habitans  Et  nous  metre  a  labry  des  incurssions  des  sau- 
vages  Nous  esperons  que  vous  nous  otorizerez  a  Continuer  dans 
notre  district 

Le  S^  pentecoste  a  Envoye  icy  un  procureur  arpenteur  avec 
d'Emple  pouvoir  pour  mesurer  Et  Borner  sa  concession  qui  con- 
siste  a  douze  mille  arpents  de  terre  ou  sont  comprises  toutes  les 
notre  il  doit  se  metre  En  devoir  de  le  faire  sous  peu  de  jour,  cest 
a  quoy  nous  formerons  notre  opositions  jusqua  ce  que  nous  avons 
recu  vos  ordres  que  nous  esperons  authoriser  nos  opositions  Et 
nous  Confirme  dans  nos  pocessions. 

Nous  vous  suplions  Nos  Seigneurs  de  nous  Envoyer  vos  de- 

1  Printed  in  this  volume,  p.  621. 

2  Probably  a  reference  to  the  Kaskaskians. 


MEMORIAL,  JULY,  1786  587 

that  you  may  render  us  the  justice,  which  good  and  faithful  sub- 
jects should  expect  from  their  sovereigns,  for  the  preservation  of 
our  property  which  is  on  the  verge  of  being  a  prey  to  the  voracity 
of  M.  Pentecoste,  who  is  eager  to  dispoil  us  of  our  patrimony  and 
to  compel  us  to  make  of  ourselves  and  our  families  a  sacrifice  to 
tyranny  by  obliging  us  to  seek  an  asylum  among  strangers  after 
having  spent  our  life-blood  in  making  our  lands  valuable  for  his 
rapacity.  We  beseech  you  to  pardon  us  if  we  make  use  of  these 
expressions ;  but  the  letter  which  he  has  written  here  proves  suffi- 
ciently his  intentions,  a  copy  of  which  we  send  joined  herewith.^ 

We  pray  you,  our  Lords,  that  we  be  maintained  in  all  our 
possessions,  usages,  former  customs  and  laws  so  that  no  authority 
can  do  violence  thereto  and  that  we  may  not  have  the  distress  of 
being  submitted  to  any  other  court  of ^ the  Illinois,  since  we  know 
the  incapacity,  spite  and  partiality  of  the  subjects  who  might 
exercise  it;^  but  we  pray  you  to  grant  us  the  permission  to  govern 
ourselves  as  we  have  always  done. 

The  court  of  this  district  of  Cahokia  has  taken  on  itself  to 
concede  to  each  single  American  or  other,  who  has  newly  arrived 
in  this  country  and  wished  to  settle  here,  land  in  our  district  of 
the  width  of  ten  arpents  and  with  an  area  of  four  hundred  and 
forty  arpents.  We  do  not  exceed  this  quantity  in  order  to  man- 
age the  land  so  that  each  can  have  some  and  we  may  be  strength- 
ened by  the  number  of  inhabitants  and  so  sheltered  from  the 
attacks  of  the  savages.  We  hope  that  you  will  authorize  us  to 
continue  to  do  so  in  our  district. 

M.  Pentecose  has  sent  here  a  surveyor  as  representative  with 
full  power  to  measure  and  lay  out  the  boundaries  of  his  con- 
cession which  consists  of  twelve  thousand  arpents  of  land  in 
which  are  included  all  ours.  He  is  bound  to  begin  to  do  it  within 
a  few  days.  That  is  why  we  shall  issue  our  injunction  until  we 
have  received  your  commands,  which  we  hope  will  authorize  our 
injunction  and  confirm  us  in  our  possessions. 

We  beseech  you,  our  Lords,  to  send  us  your  decision  on  all 
the  articles  of  these  representations  by  M.  Cerr^,  our  attorney, 
so  that  we  may  know  to  what  we  are  bound. 


588  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

cisions  sur  tous  les  articles  de  ces  representations  par  m'"  Cerd 
notre  fonde  de  pouvoir  afin  de  savoir  a  quoy  nous  sommes  tenus. 

voicy  la  quatriesme  representations  que  nous  avons  Eu  Ihon- 
neur  de  vous  adresser  sans  avoir  jamais  recu  aucunne  reponse 
Nous  penssons  que  si  vous  avez  Eu  la  bontd  de  nous  repondre 
tout  a  Et^  intercept^  au  village  des  Kakakias 

Nous  atendons  tout  de  votre  Bonte,  Equite  Et  integrite. 

Permetez  Nous  Nos  Seigneurs  de  nous  dire  toujour  Vostres 
humbles  tres  obeissants  tres  soumis  Et  Fidels  Sujets  Les  mag- 
istrats  du  district  des  Cahos  aux  ilinois  faisant  pour  toute  la 
Communautd  des  habitants  du  d*  lieu. 

aux  cahos  des  ilinois  Le  15.  juillet  1786. 

Trottier  J  B  H  La  Croix 

Mth  Saucier  A.  Girardin 

de  B  Dubuque  Commandant 

marque  +  Jh  de 

La  pense  Marque  +  Louis 

de  Chattelle 

Marque  +  C  Alary 

Labuxiere  to  Congress,  July  17,  1786. 

aux  Messieurs  du  Congres 
Messieurs 

ayant  eu  Ihonneur  d'avoir  Et^  Nomme  procureur  des  Etat 
aux  ilinois  il  y  a  cinq  ans  au  lieu  et  place  du  s^  Girault  qui  occu- 
poit  cet  Employ,  depuis  ce  tems  jay  pris  la  liberte  de  vous 
Ecrire  quatre  fois  et  de  vous  rendre  compte  de  ce  quil  y  avoit  de 
plus  interessant  aux  ilinois  soit  que  mes  Lettres  ne  vous  soient 
pas  parvenues  ou  que  vos  Reponses  ne  m'ayent  pas  Ete  remises, 
je  n'ay  pu  savoir  si  je  devoit  continuer  mes  fonctions  dans  cette 
charge,  la  mesinteligences  des  magistrats  des  Caskakias  et  le 
Boulversement  des  affaires  des  particuliers  occasionnez  par  quel- 
que  personnes  avide  dargent,  ma  oblige  de  me  retirer  avec  ma 
famille  aux  cahos  ou  jay  trouve  des  habitans  remplis  d'union  de 
Concorde  Et  de  fidelite  aux  Etats  Et  une  cour  de  justice  quils 
ont    soin    dadministrer    avec   Equite    a    ceux    qui   la    reclame. 

1  Papers  oj  the  Old  Congress,  Ixviii.,  25,  original  manuscript. 


LABUXIERE  TO  CONGRESS,  JULY,  1786  589 

This  is  the  fourth  representation  which  we  have  had  the  honor 
of  sending  you  without  having  received  any  answer.  We  think 
that  if  you  have  had  the  goodness  to  answer  us,  all  letters  have 
been  intercepted  at  the  village  of  Kaskaskia. 

We  expect  everything  from  your  goodness,  equity  and  integrity. 
Permit  us,  our  Lords,  to  call  ourselves  always  your  humble, 
very  obedient,  very  submissive  and  faithful  subjects,  the  Mag- 
istrates of  the  District  of  Cahokia  in  the  Illinois,  acting  for  all 
the  community  of  the  inhabitants  of  the  said  place. 
At  Cahokia  the  15th  of  July,  1786. 
[Signed] 

Trottier.  J.  B.  H.  Lacroix. 

Mth.  Saucier.  A.  Girardin. 

of 
Mark  +  Joseph  B.  Dubuque,  Commandant. 

Lapance.  of 

of  Mark  +  Louis 

Mark  +  C.  Alarie.  Chatel. 

Labuxierre  to  Congress,  july  17,  1786.* 
To  the  Gentlemen  of  Congress, 
Sirs: — 
Since  I  had  the  honor  of  being  named  state's  attorney  at 
the  Illinois  five  years  ago  in  the  place  and  stead  of  M.  Girault 
who  held  this  office,^  I  have  taken  the  liberty  of  writing  to  you 
four  times  and  of  rendering  account  to  you  of  what  there  was  of 
most  interest  in  the  Illinois.  Either  my  letters  have  not  reached 
you  or  your  answers  have  not  been  delivered  to  me,  and  I  have 
not  been  able  to  know  whether  I  ought  to  continue  to  perform 
my  functions  in  this  office.  The  misunderstanding  of  the  mag- 
istrates of  Kaskaskia  and  the  extreme  disorder  of  the  business 
of  the  individuals,  occasioned  by  some  persons  greedy  for  money, 
have  compelled  me  to  withdraw  with  my  family  to  Cahokia, 
where  I  have  found  inhabitants  filled  with  unity  of  peace  and 
fidelity  to  the  states,  and  a  court  of  justice  which  they  are  careful 

See  his  appointment,  supra  p.  487;   also  Post  p.  625,  note  i6. 


590  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

si  vous  jugez  Convenable  Messieurs  que  je  continue  a  exercer 
cette  charge  je  vous  suplie  de  menvoyer  votre  commission  avec 
les  instruction  que  je  doit  suivre  afin  de  m'y  Conformer  Et  de 
meriter  laplaudissement  Et  protection  de  mes  souverain,  pour 
lesquels  je  mouray  avec  fidelite  jay  Ihonneur  detre  avec  profond 
respect  Messieurs 

Votre  tres  humble  tres  obeissant  Et  fidel  sujet 

Labuxiere 
aux  cahos  des  ilinois  le  17.  juillet  1786 
Public  Notice,  February  26,  1786. 
Le  Public  est  averty  que  ceux  qui  voudront  prendre  des  terres 
audela  de  Lequiere  des  terres  de  la  prairie  du  pont  ait  a  Se  pre- 
senter dicy  a  jeudy  prochain  deux  de  Mars,  et  Se  presenteron 
a  M^  Girardin  pour  les  metre  En  liste  Et  Borner  les  dites  terres 
pour  en  faire  les  Clostures,  passe  Le  tems  de  jeudy,  elles  seront 
Conceddees  a  des  personnes  qui  Se  Sont  deja  presentee  donne 
aux  Cahos  le  26.  fevrier  1786  J  B  H  LaCroix 

preside 
Lu  public  et  affiche  a  la  porte  de  I'eglise  des  Cahos  le  dimanche 
26  fer.  et  lundy  27  fer  par  moy  huissier  soussigne 

Pier  troge 
Agreement  between  Inhabitants  of  Cahokia  and  Tardi- 
VEAu,  August  27,  1787. 

Cotte  L  Inven'"®  soixante  Neuvieme. 
Sachent  tous  par  ces  presentes  que  les  habitants  franjais  du 
village  des  Cahokias  et  Ses  dependances  ayant  apointe  Barthelemy 
Tardiveau  ecuyer  leur  agent  aupres  du  Congres  a  I'effet  de  de- 
mander  et  obtenir  pour  eux  la  confirmation  de  leurs  anciens  droits, 
et  en  outre  d'autres  concessions  de  terres  dans  ce  pays  des  caho- 
kias et  Ses  dependances  prometons  et  nous  obligeons,  jointement 
et  Separement,  tant  pour  nous  que  pour  nos  enfans  males,  ou 
autres  personnes  que  nous  representons,  de  ceder,  quitter,  et 
abandonner  en  toute  propriete  aud^  S^  Barthelemy  Tardiveau,  ses 

1  Chi.  Hist.  Soc,  Cah.  Rcc,  original  manuscript.     Transcription  by  the  eJitor. 

2  For  other  references  to  Prairie  du  Pont,  see  pp.  153,  159,  565. 

3  Menard  Col.,  Tardiveau  Papers,  original  manuscript.     Transcription  by  the  editor. 
*  Notary's  index  number. 


PUBLIC  NOTICE,  FEBRUARY,  1786  591 

to  administer  with  equity  to  those  who  ask  its  help.  If  you 
judge  it  fitting,  sirs,  that  I  continue  to  exercise  this  duty,  I  beg 
you  to  send  me  your  commission  with  the  instructions  which  I 
should  follow,  so  that  I  may  conform  thereto  and  merit  the 
applause  and  protection  of  my  sovereigns,  for  whom  I  will  die 
with  fidelity.     I  have  the  honor  of  being  with  profound  respect. 

Sirs     Your  very  humble  and 
At  Cahokia  of  the  Illinois  faithful  subject 

the  17th  of  July,  1786  ,  Labuxiere. 

PUBLIC  NOTICE,  FEBRUARY   26,   1786.^ 

The  public  is  notified  that  those  who  wish  to  take  up  land 
beyond  the  section  of  the  lands  of  the  Prairie  du  Pont  must 
present  themselves  between  now  and  Thursday,  the  second  of 
March,  and  they  shall  present  themselves  to  M.  Girardin  to  be 
put  on  the  list  and  to  have  the  said  lands  surveyed  for  making 
the  fences  thereof.  After  Thursday,  the  lands  will  be  conceded 
to  the  persons  who  have  already  presented  themselves.  Given 
at  Cahokia  February  26,  1786.^       J.  B.  H.  Lacroix,  President. 

Read,  published  and  posted  on  the  door  of  the  church  of 
Cahokia,  Sunday,  February  26,  and  Monday,  February  27,  by 
me,  the  undersigned  huissier.  Pierre  Troge. 

Agreement    between   the    Inhabitants    of    Cahokia    and 
Tardiveau,  August  27,  1787.^ 

Page  L.  inventory  sixty-nine.* 

Know  all  men  by  these  presents  that  [we],  the  French  in- 
habitants of  the  village  of  Cahokia  and  its  dependencies,  having 
appointed  Barthelemi  Tardiveau  Esquire,  our  agent  at  Congress 
for  the  purpose  of  petitioning  and  obtaining  for  us  the  confirma- 
tion of  our  ancient  rights  and  furthermore  of  other  concessions 
of  lands  in  the  country  of  Cahokia  and  its  dependencies,  promise 
and  bind  ourselves  jointly  and  severally  as  well  in  our  own 
names  as  in  behalf  of  our  male  children  or  of  other  persons 
whom  we  represent,  to  cede,  quit  and  abandon  in  full  owner- 
ship to  the  said  M.  Barthelemi  Tardiveau,  his  heirs  or  assigns 
the  tenth  part  of  all  the  grounds  and  lands,  which  he  shall  cause 
to  be  conceded  in  our  favor,  other  than  those  which  are  ours 


592 


ILLINOfS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


heritiers  ou  ayans  causes,  la  dixieme  partie  de  tous  les  terreins  et 
terres  quil  fera  conceder  en  notre  faveur,  autre  que  ceux  qui  nous 
Sont  acquise  et  dont  nous  Sommes  En  pocession  par  les  quatre 
lieues  en  quarr^  et  sur  chaque  face  qui  ont  et^  anciennement  con- 
cedde  a  la  mission  et  paroisse  des  Cahokia  par  M""^  de  Boisbriant 
et  des  hursins  gouverneur  et  Commissaire  deputez  par  le  Roy  de 
france  En  ce  pays  Suivant  la  concession  que  nous  en  avons  en 
datte  du  vingt  deux  juin  mil  sept  cent  vingt  deux  Lequel  dixieme 
Sera  pour  lui  tenir  lieu  de  payment  de  ses  peines  et  Soins,  frais 
de  voyage  ou  autres;  quil  fera  pour  obtenir  les  dites  nouvelles 
Concessions;  a  la  condition  que,  S'il  n'obtient  Rien,  il  N'aura 
Rien  a  repeter  enver  nous  pour  Ses  dites  peines,  frais,  et  Soins.  il 
est  Entendu  que  led*  s^  Barthelemy  Tardiveau  ne  poura  pas 
prendre  le  dixieme  des  terres  qui  lui  est  accorde  pour  son  paye- 
ment  dans  I'Etendue  des  quatre  lieues  en  quarre  ci  dessus  men- 
tionnes  Et  qui  apartiennent  de  plain  droit  a  la  mission  des  cahos 
et  aux  particliers.  ce  qui  est  Stipule  par  clause  express  mais  que 
le  dit  dixieme  lui  Sera  donne  pour  les  nouvelles  concessions  quil 
obtiendra  pour  Les  habitants,  dans  un  ou  deux  emplacements 
faisant  partie  de  la  concession  generale  quil  pourra  obtenir; 
pourvu  neantmoins  que  ledit  ou  les  dits  emplacements  Soient  a 
peu  pres  egaux  en  qualite  de  terroir  et  Situation  au  reste  des  terres 
ainsi  obtenues.  En  foi  de  quoi  Nous  les  magistrats  Et  principaux 
habitants  du  village  des  Cahokias  et  Ses  dependances  avons  Signe 
le  present  concorda  Et  a  icelui  appos^  le  Scau  de  Notre  Cour. 
fait  unanimement  aux  Cahokias  le  vingt  septiesme  jour  d'Aoust 
L'an  mil  Sept  cent  quatre  vingt  Sept. 
[Signed] 

f.  saucier. 

Mth  Saucier. 

DuCharme. 

P.  Poupar. 

B.  Saucier. 


At.  Girardin. 
Louis  Gaud. 
C  Lefevre. 
B.  Dubuque. 
T  Brady. 
Phillipe  Engel. 
Pierre  Billet. 
Pierre  La  fleure. 
Pierre  Laperche. 


J  B  H  LaCroix. 
Bap*  Baron, 
fr  trottier. 
J  B*  aLarie. 
Joseph  Lambert. 
Aug  Dubuque. 
Henry  Byron, 
jh  BelCour. 


CONTRACT  WITH  TARDIVEAU,  AUGUST,  1787      593 


and  of  which  we  are  in  possession,  in  extent  four  l^eagues  square, 
which  were  formerly  granted  to  the  mission  and  parish  of  Caho- 
kia  by  MM.  de  Boisbriant  and  des  Ursins,  governor  and  com- 
missary appointed  by  the  king  of  France  in  this  country,  according 
to  the  land-grant,  which  we  have,  dated  June  22,  1722.  This 
tenth  part  shall  be  understood  to  take  the  place  of  payment  to 
him  for  his  labor  and  pains,  costs  of  travel  and  other  expenses, 
which  he  shall  incur  in  order  to  obtain  the  said  new  concessions ; 
on  condition  that,  if  he  obtains  nothing,  there  shall  be  no  cause 
for  action  against  us  for  his  said  labors,  costs  and  pains.  It 
is  understood  that  the  said  M.  Barth^lemi  Tardiveau  cannot 
take  the  tenth  of  the  lands,  which  is  accorded  him  for  his  pay- 
ment, in  the  extent  of  the  four  leagues  square  mentioned  above 
which  belongs  in  full  right  to  the  mission  of  Cahokia  and  to 
individuals,  and  this  is  stipulated  by  express  clause;  but  that 
the  said  tenth  shall  be  given  as  payment  for  the  new  concessions 
which  he  shall  obtain  for  the  inhabitants,  in  one  or  two  pieces 
of  ground  making  part  of  the  general  concession  which  he 
shall  obtain;  provided,  nevertheless,  that  the  said  piece  or  pieces 
be  nearly  equal  in  quality  of  soil  and  situation  to  the  rest  of  the 
lands  thus  obtained.  In  faith  of  which  we,  the  magistrates  and 
principal  inhabitants  of  the  village  of  Cahokia  and  its  depend- 
encies have  signed  and  thereto  set  the  seal  of  our  Court.  Done 
by  unanimous  consent  at  Cahokia  the  twenty-seventh  day  of 
August,  1787.^ 
[Signed.] 

Ant.  Girardin. 

Louis  Gaud. 

C.  Lefevre. 

B.  Dubuque. 
.  T.  Brady. 

Philippe  Engel. 

Pierre  Billet. 

Pierre  Lafleur. 

Pierre  Laperche. 


F.  Saucier. 
Mth.  Saucier. 
DuCharme. 
P.  Poupar. 
B.  Saucier. 

[Seal,  three  -fleur- 
de-lis  with  crown 
above] 


J.  B.  H.  LaCroix. 
Bte.  Baron. 
Fr.  Trottier. 
J.  Bte.  Alarie. 
Joseph  Lambert. 
Aug.  Dubuque. 
Henry  Biron. 
Joseph  BelCour. 


'  In  this  same  collection,  the  Tardiveau  Papers,  there  are  similar  agreements  made  with 
the  inhabitants  of  Vincennes  and  Kaskaskia  and  with  the  American  settlers. 


594  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Inhabitants  of  Cahokia  to  Tardiveau,  September  i,  1787. 

Cotte  L.  Inv^e.  soixante  quatorzieme. 
Monsieur 

Nous  avons  recu  les  pieces  que  vous  nous  avez  adress^es. 
Nous  Nentendons  Et  ne  sommes  Convenus  avec  vous  que  de 
vous  donner  le  dixieme  sur  les  terres  qui  nous  seront  nouvellem^ 
Conceddees  par  le  congre  pour  nous  et  nos  Enfans  males,  mais 
non  pas  dans  les  terres  dont  nous  sommes  deja  En  pocession  qui 
Sont  Enclaves  dans  notre  Seigneurie  des  Cahos,  dont  nous  avons 
un  titre  Suffisant  de  la  dite  Seigneurie  de  quatre  lieues  en  quarre 
Et  de  laquelle  nous  ne  Croyons  pas  avoir  Besoin  dautre  Confir- 
mation, cest  pourquoy  nous  Exceptons  ce  dixieme  sur  les  quatre 
lieues  de  ladite  Seigneurie  qui  nous  apartien  par  le  titre  que  nous 
En  avons  et  que  nous  croyons  navoir  pas  Besoin  detre  confirme, 
tant  qu'aux  nouvelles  concessions  hor  de  notre  Seigneurie  que 
vous  voudrez  Bien  nous  obtenir  nous  sommes  toujour  d'accord 
Et  Convenons  de  vous  en  donner  le  dixieme  dans  un  Endroit  ou 
deux  pour  vu  toutes  fois  que  cela  Soit  hors  de  notre  Seigneurie 
par  conventions  expresse  nous  nentendons  pas  payer  aucunes  droits 
rentes  redevances  ni  impots  p^  les  terres  que  vous  nous  obtiendres 
du  Congre  cela  nous  deviendroit  trop  onereux  par  la  suite. 

Nous  vous  prions  dexcepter  dans  la  procuration  les  pouvoir 
que  nous  avons  donne  a  M^  Cerre  que  nous  nentendons  point 
Ennuler  et  qui  ne  concernent  que  la  propriete  de  notre  Seigneurie 
et  commune  p^  tous  autres  pretendus  pouvoir  donnez  par  nous, 
nous  les  desavouons  comme  faux  Et  ayant  Ete  fabriques  hor  de 
notre  connoissance.  Nous  ne  trouvons  que  ce  Changement  a 
faire  dans  le  concorda  Et  dans  la  procuration  p.  larl.  qui  concerne 
les  pouvoir  donnez  a  M'"  Cerre. 

Nous  avons  Ihoneur  d'Etre  respectueusement  et  avec  atache- 
ment. 

Monsieur 

Votre  tres  humble  et  tres 
obeissant  serviteurs 

1  Menard  Col.,  Tardiveau  Papers,  original  manuscript.     Transcription  by  the  editor. 

2  Notary's  index  number. 

3  See  supra,  p.  585. 


LETTER  TO  TARDIVEAU,  SEPTEMBER,  1787         595 

Inhabitants  of  Cahokia  to  Tardiveau,  September  i,  1787.^ 
Sir: 

Page  L.  inventory  seventy-four.^ 

We  have  received  the  documents  which  you  have  sent  us.  We 
intend  and  have  agreed  with  you  to  give  you  only  the  tenth  of 
the  lands  which  shall  be  newly  conceded  by  Congress  to  us  and 
our  male  children,  but  not  of  the  lands,  of  which  we  are  in  pos- 
session already  and  which  are  included  in  our  seigniory  of  Caho- 
kia, for  which  we  have  the  sufficient  title  of  the  said  seigniory  for 
four  leagues  square  and  for  which  we  do  not  believe  that  we  have 
need  of  other  confirmation.  This  is  the  reason  that  we  except 
this  tenth  from  the  four  leagues  square  of  the  said  seigniory, 
which  belongs  to  us  by  title-deeds  which  we  have  and  which  we 
believe  have  no  need  of  being  confirmed.  In  regard  to  the  new 
concessions  outside  of  our  seigniory,  which  you  wish  to  obtain 
for  us,  we  are  always  in  agreement  and  do  agree  to  give  you 
the  tenth  in  one  or  two  pieces,  provided,  nevertheless,  that  it  is 
outside  of  our  seigniory.  By  express  convention  we  do  not  un- 
dertake to  pay  any  duties,  rents,  dues  or  imposts  for  the  lands 
which  you  obtain  for  us  from  Congress.  That  would  become 
too  onerous  in  the  end. 

We  beg  you  to  except  in  the  power  of  attorney  the  powers 
which  we  have  given  to  M.  Cerre,  which  we  do  not  intend  to 
annul  and  which  concerns  only  the  ownership  of  our  seigniory 
and  commons.^  As  for  all  other  powers,  claimed  to  be  given  by 
us,  we  disavow  them  as  false  and  as  having  been  fabricated 
without  our  knowledge."*  We  find  only  this  change  to  make 
in  the  agreement  and  in  the  particular  power  given  to  M. 
Cerre. 

We  have  the  honor  of  being  respectfully  and  with  attach- 
ment, 

Sir 

your  very  humble  and  very 

obedient  servants. 

*  A  reference  to  the  agent  of  the  French  party  of  Kaskaskia,  Parker,  who  had  been  given  a 
copy  of  a  former  petition  of  the  people  of  Cahokia  without  consulting  them.  See  Introduction, 
p.  cxxx.  and  also  p.  567,  n.  2. 


596  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

[Signed].  aux  cahos  le  7  7^^®  1787. 

f .  saucier.  DuChai^ne. 

A*  Girardin.  Phillipe  Engel. 

Mth  Saucier.  B  Saucier, 

fr  trottier. 
Nous  ne  vous  prions  de  faire  En  sorte  dobtenir  les  terres, 
prenant  depuis  la  rivierre  de  Laigle  En  remontant  le  mississippy 
du  Coste  du  Nord-Est. 

nous  avons  refait  la  procuration  ainsi  que  le  concorda  que 
nous  esperons  que  vous  agreerez. 

Nous  vous  prions  de  nous  Envoyer  au  recu  de  la  procuration 
et  du  concorda,  a  moins  que  vos  occupations  ne  vous  permetent 
de  nous  En  Envoyer  un  double. 
[Addressed]  A  Monsieur 

Monsieur  Tardiveau 

Commissaire  pour  le  Congre  du  present 
aux  Caskaskia. 
Address  by  Robert  Watts,  September  14,  1787. 
Adresse  Faite  a  la  Cour  des  Cahos,  Seance  tenant  par  Robert 
Watt  Commandant  nome  par  icelle  au  Lieu  apele  le  Grand  ruis- 
seau  dans  Sa  dependance  &  District. 
Messieurs: 

Ce  n'est  Point  ma  propre  Cause  qui  me  traduit  aux  pieds  de 

votre  auguste  assemblee^ C'estCelledevotresurete 

votre  repos,  votre  justice  &  bien  mieux  Encore  Celle  de  votre 
Supreme  autorite  que  rien  ne  devroit  alterer  ny  ebranler;  & 
c'est  Cependant  Messieurs  Ceque  le  desordre  vient  d'enfanter 
anjourdhuy. 

Si  vous  m'aves  comissioner  pour  soutenir  votre  Justice  en 
veillan  pour  vous  Sur  la  Surete  publique  &  Sur  le  repos  et  les 
demarches  de  Cette  poignee  d'habitans  qui  Compose  &  forme 
le  petit  vilage  du  Grand    ruisseau,  Je  ne  dois  pas  vous  laisser 

1  The  postscript  appears  to  be  written  in  a  different  handwriting  from  the  body  of  the  letter, 
but  this  ditference  may  be  due  to  a  change  of  pen.  The  "ne"  of  the  first  paragraph  is  an 
insertion,  and  may  be  a  mistake  or  a  forgery.  If  so,  the  clause  would  be  positive  instead  of 
negative,  as  given  in  the  translation. 

2  Chi.  Hist.  Soc,  Cah.  Rec,  original  manuscript.  Transcription  by  the  editor.  There  is 
a  copy  of  the  same  by  the  clerk  in  the  Menard  Col.,  Tard.  Papers. 

3  The  dots  are  in  the  original. 


WATT'S  ADDRESS,  SEPTEMBER,  1787  597 

At  Cahokia,  September  7,  1787. 
[Signed] 

F.  Saucier.  DuCharme. 

Ant.  Girardin.  Philippe  Engel. 

Matt.  Saucier.  B.  Saucier. 

Fr.  Trottier. 
We  do  not  pray  you  to  act  so  as  to  obtain  the  lands  which 
extend  from  the  Eagel  River  up  the  Mississippi  on  the  north-east 
side. 

We  have  remade  the  power  of  attorney  and  also  the  agreement, 
which  we  hope  that  you  will  accept. 

We  pray  you  to  send  us  notice  on  receipt  of  the  power  of  attor- 
ney and  agreement,  provided  your  work  does  not  permit  you  to 
send  a  duplicate  thereof.^ 
[Addressed]     To  Monsieur  Tardiveau 
Commissioner  to  Congress 

at  present  at  Kaskaskia. 
Address  by  Robert  Watts,  September  14,  1787.'^ 
Address  made  to  the  Court  of  Cahokia  in  session  by  Robert 
Watts,  Commandant,  named  by  the  Court,  at  the  place  called 
Grand  Ruisseau,  in  its  dependency  and  district. 
Sirs : — 

It  is  not  my  cause  which  calls  me  into  the  presence  of  your 

august  assembly ^     It  is  that  of  your  security,  your 

peace,  your  justice  and  far  better  still  that  of  your  supreme 
authority,  which  nothing  should  alter  or  disturb;  and  yet,  gentle- 
men, it  is  that  which  disorder  is  about  to  bring  forth  to-day. 

If  you  have  commissioned  me  to  sustain  your  justice  in  watch- 
ing for  you  over  the  public  security  and  over  the  tranquility  and 
activities  of  this  handful  of  inhabitants  who  compose  and  form 
the  little  village  of  Grand  Ruisseau,  I  ought  not  to  allow  you  to 
remain  ignorant  a  longer  time,  gentlemen,  that  there  is  among 
us  one  whose  would-be  pretentions  are  directed  towards  weaken- 
ing and  diminishing  your  authority, that  authority    which 

has  always  maintained  peace  and  harmony,  that  which  the 
estates  of  Virginia  even  have  deigned  to  respect  in  giving  it  their 


598  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

ignorer  plus  longtems  Messieurs  qu'il  en  est  parmi  nous  dont  les 
pretentions  Soit  disant,  se  portent  a  affoiblir  et  dininuer  votre 

autorite, elle  qui  a  tour  jour  Maintenue  la  paix  et 

L'harmonie,  elle  que  les  etats  de  Virginie  meme  ont  daigner 
respecter  en  I'aprouvan  deslors,  elle  que  ces  memes  etats  reconoi- 
tront  toujour  Pour  Cooperer  a  la  gloire  des  etats  unis. 

De  quel  oeil  apres  des  droits  aussi  bien  Ciment^r  et  emandr 
Poures  vous  voir  Messieurs  I'atentat  et  I'infraction  que  L'on  Comet 
aujourdhuy  sur  vos  pouvoirs. 

un  Sieur  piquet,  Come  chef  de  parti  dans  la  Cabale  du  Grand 
ruisseau,  vient  de  me  d^vestir  des  titres  &  qualit^s  Dont  J'etois 
honor6  par  votre  respectable  Cour,  &  sur  I'enquette  que  je  me  suis 
hate  de  faire  des  Causes  d'un  procede  Pareil,  un  Certain  roger 
home  sans  nom  &  sans  honeur  auroit  vilainement  abus^  tout  Ce 
qui  emane  de  votre  autoritd  au  moment  ou  mon  devoir  m'oblig- 
eoit  de  prendre  la  deffence  de  votre  auguste  Cour  dans  la  Con- 
servation de  ses  droits  &  de  ses  privileges. 

Passeries  vous  sous  silence  Messieurs,  des  Iniquitds  qui  vont 

jusqu'a  blesser  L'autorite  la  plus  respectable; Ce  n'est 

plus  la  votre  dont  II  est  question  en  ce  moment,  c'est  Celle  Mes- 
sieurs des  etats  de  Virginie  que  vous  deves  deffendre,  C'est  elle 
qui  est  offence  dans  le  Corp  respectable  qui  vous  assemble  ici, 
Car  vous  n'etes  a  Cet  dgard  que  L'image  de  Leur  Justice  Come 
Je  ne  suis  au  votre  que  I'electricit^  de  vos  Volontes. 

Si  tant  dTnsubordination  devenoit  Inpunissable  que  Devien- 
droit  par  la  suitte  votre  Surete,  vos  droits  inalterables  vos  Families 
&  vos  biens;  ne  vous  rendries  vous  Comptable  Envers  dieu  en  vers 
les  homes,  vous  en  qui  chaque  Cytoyen  doit  placer  sa  Confiance 
par  la  surete  quils  ^tablissent  dans  les  droits  qui  vous  apartienent 
&  que  loin  de  laisser  oisifs,  deves  au  Contraire  dans  des  besoins 
aussi  pressants  faire  eclater  d'une  Maniere  propre  a  dtouffer 
dans  sa  naissance  le  danger  evident  de  voir  chaque  Cytoyen  et 
vous  meme  Messieurs,  devenir  le  jouet  d'une  Soit  disante  Cour 
Cr^e  &  Innove  sans  autorite  &  sans  pouvoir  dans  le  lieu  de  la  belle 

1  For  the  history  of  Grand  Ruisseau  and  Bellefontaine,  see  Introduction,  p.  cxlix.,  and 
also  pp.  i8q,  n.  2,  219,  307. 


WATT'S  ADDRESS,  SEPTEMBER,  1787  599 

approval  thenceforth,  that  which  these  same  estates  recognize 
always  as  co-operating  to  the  glory  of  the  United  States. 

With  what  eye,  after  rights  so  well  strengthened  and  emanated, 
can  you  see,  gentlemen,  the  outrage  and  infraction,  which  is 
being  committed  to-day  on  your  powers? 

A  certain  M.  Piggott,  as  party  chief  in  the  cabal  of  Grand 
Ruisseau,  has  just  divested  me  of  the  titles  and  qualities  with  which 
I  was  honored  by  your  honorable  Court;  and  at  the  enquiry, 
which  I  hastened  to  make  in  regard  to  the  causes  of  such  a  pro- 
ceeding, a  certain  Rogers,  a  man  without  name  and  without  honor, 
has  villainously  abused  all  that  proceeds  from  your  authority  at  the 
moment  when  my  duty  obliged  me  to  take  up  the  defence  of  your 
august  Court  in  the  preservation  of  its  rights  and  its  privileges.^ 

Would  you  pass  in  silence,  gentlemen,  iniquities  which  go  as 

far  as  to  wound  the  most  honorable  authority  ? It  is  no  longer 

yours  which  is  in  question  at  this  moment;  it  is,  gentlemen, 
that  of  the  estates  of  Virginia  which  you  ought  to  defend.  It  is 
that  which  is  offended  in  the  honorable  body  which  assembles 
you  here;  for  in  this  respect  you  are  only  the  image  of  their  jus- 
tice, just  as  I  am  for  yours  the  electricity  of  your  wills. 

If  such  insubordination  were  to  be  unpunishable,  what  would 
in  consequence  become  of  your  security,  your  unalterable  rights, 
your  families  and  your  property?  Would  you  not  render  your- 
selves accountable  to  God  and  to  men,  you  in  whom  each  citizen 
should  place  his  confidence  through  the  security,  which  they 
establish,  in  the  rights  which  belong  to  you,  and  which  far  from 
permitting  ease,  you  ought  on  the  contrary  in  needs  so  pressing 
to  make  blaze  out  in  a  manner  calculated  to  destroy  in  its  birth 
the  danger,  obvious  to  every  citizen  and  to  you  also,  gentlemen,  of 
becoming  the  sport  of  a  would-be  court,  created  and  innovated  with- 
out authority  and  without  power  in  the  locality  of  Bellefontaine, 
where  the  assemblies  must  be  convoked  in  order  to  judge  definitely 
on  all  that  shall  be  carried  before  their  would-be  tribunal.^ 

Is  there  not  therein  a  formal  defiance  made  to  the  most  sacred 
authority  ?   Is  that  not  a  violation  of  the  submission  which  is  due  to 

2  Commandant  Watts'  knowledge  of  French  is  not  always  equal  to  his  Ciceronian  oratory, 
and  the  result  is  at  times  obscurity  of  meaning. 


6oo  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

fontaine  &  ou  les  assembles  Poivent  Se  Convoquer  pour  juger 
definitivement  sur  tout  Ce  qui  Sera  port^  a  leur  Soidisan  tribunaL 

N'est  ce  pas  la  un  mepris  Formel  fait  a  I'autoritd  la  plus  sacr^, 
n'est  ce  pas  enfreindre  la  soumission  que  I'on  doit  au  Sanctuaire 
le  plus  Saint,  n'est  ce  pas  abuser  ouvertement  de  la  Constitution 
Fondamentale  des  etats  unis;  ou  est  le  droit  des  Gens  ou  est  La 
Surete  publique,  ou  est  I'amour  de  la  patrie  &  ou  est  Enfin  cette 
autorite   absolue  qui  apartieri  a  notre  metropole;    deves  vous 

Messieurs  En  areter  Le  Cours Je  vous  le  demande! 

Craignes  Cet  orage  qui  grpnde  deja  sur  vos  tetes,  Craign^s  le  feu 
dangereux  dont  vous  deves  redouter  les  dtincelles,  Craignes  vous 
dis  Je  Messieurs,  Cet  attentat  aux  loix  &  a  L'etats,  &l  Nous  vous 
verons  bientot  repondre  sur  chaque  individu  la  Justice  que  vous 
leur  deves,  au  moment  surtout  ou  chaque  Fidel  Cytoyen  eleve  sa 
voix  &  qu'il  s'adresse  a  vous  pour  atirer  vos  bontes  sur  les  mal- 
heurs  que  Fomentent  toujours  le  Desordre  &  L'insubordination. 

Qui  Messieurs  J'entrevois  vos  regards  Favorables  sur  des 
Evenements  qui  nous  touchent  toute  en  particulier,  &  dont  les 
suittes  ne  scauroient  etre  que  luneste,  Je  vous  vois  areter  Le  danger 
d'une  Conduite  aussi  ireguliere  dans  une  poignee  d'etres  erans, 
qui  n'ont  pas  dedaigne  de  vous  demander  un  asile  &  une  retraite 
lorsque  leur  propre  partrie  etoit  sourde  a  leurs  besoin,  Je  vous 
vois  dis  Je  rompre  le  silence  &  reprimer  le  Coupable  audace 
Empreinte  du  Crime  de  leze  etat;  que  votre  Justice  Se  mani- 
feste  &  qu'elle  eclate  &  Ce  Sera  pour  vous  une  augmentation 
a  la  gloire  que  vous  deves  aux  etats  &  un  monument  a  vos  bontes; 
mais sices  m ernes  bontes  Passoient  Sous  Silence depareils  attentats, 
vous  veries  bientot  Fouler  aux  pieds  vos  droits  &  votre  equite. 

C'est  pourquoi  Messieurs  qu'apres  avoir  mis  Sous  vos  yeux 
La  position  Fatale  d'une  circonstance  dangereuse,  J'ai  tout  lieu 
d'esperer,  Non  Come  membre  particulier  des  representation  que 
J'expose  a  votre  Cour,  mais  Comme  Charge  de  la  part  De  toute 
Ceux  qui  respectent  vos  droits  &  vos  Immunites,  davoir  pour 
agreable  de  Faire  transporter  Le  S^  Piquet  habitant  dans  votre 
district  du  grand  ruisseau,  pour  le  reprimer  Dans  Ses  d-marches, 
lui  defendre  d'exercer   &  De  S'eriger  en  Soidisan  Magistrat  et 


WATT'S  ADDRESS,  SEPTEMBER,  1787  601 

the  most  sacred  sanctuary  ?  Is  that  not  an  open  abuse  of  the  funda- 
mental constitution  of  the  United  States?  Where  is  the  right 
of  the  people  ?  Where  is  the  public  surety  ?  Where  is  the  love  of 
country  and  where  finally  is  that  absolute  authority  which 
belongs  to  our  metropolis?  Ought  you  not  to  stay  its  course?. . 
I  demand  it  of  you !  Do  you  fear  this  tempest  which  rum- 
bles already  over  our  heads;  do  you  fear  the  dangerous  fire,  the 
sparks  from  which  you  ought  to  dread;  do  you  fear  I  say,  gen- 
lemen,  this  outrage  on  the  laws  and  the  estates.;  and  we  shall  see 
you  soon  answering  to  each  individual  for  the  justice  which  you 
owe  him,  at  a  moment  especially  when  each  faithful  citizen  is 
raising  his  voice  in  appeal  to  you  to  attract  your  benevolence  to 
the  evils  which  are  always  fomenting  disorder  and  insubordination ! 

Yes,  Gentlemen,  I  catch  a  glimpse  of  your  looks  favorable  to 
the  events  which  affect  us  all  and  severally,  and  the  results  of 
which  could  be  only  fatal ;  I  see  you  stay  the  danger  of  a  conduct 
so  irregular  in  a  handful  of  erring  beings,  who  have  not  disdeigned 
to  ask  of  you  an  asylum  and  retreat,  when  their  own  country  was 
deaf  to  their  needs;  I  see  you,  say  I,  break  the  silence  and  repress 
the  sinful,  bold  crime  of  high  treason.  Let  your  justice  be  made 
manifest  and  let  it  blaze  forth  and  there  will  be  for  you  an  increase 
in  the  glory  which  you  owe  the  states  and  a  monument  to  your 
benevolence;  but  if  this  same  benevolence  should  pass  in  silence 
such  outrages,  you  would  soon  see  your  rights  and  your  justice 
trampled  under  foot. 

That  is  the  reason,  gentlemen,  why,  after  having  placed  before 
your  eyes  the  fatal  position  of  a  dangerous  event,  I  have 
every  reason  to  hope,  not  as  a  particular  member  of  the  representa- 
tion which  I  am  setting  forth  to  your  Court,  but  as  intrusted  by 
all  those  who  respect  your  rights  and  immunities,  that  you  will 
determine  to  cause  M.  Piggott,  inhabitant  in  your  district  of  Grand 
Ruisseau,  to  be  transported  in  order  to  restrain  his  activities,  and 
to  forbid  him  to  exercise  the  duties  of  and  set  himself  up  as  a 
would-be  magistrate  and  justice  of  the  peace  in  the  w^ole  depart- 
ment and  dependency  of  your  Court,  on  pain  of  being  treated  as 
an  insurgent  and  rebel  to  the  United  States  and  of  being  from  now 


6o2  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Juge  de  paix  Dans  tout  le  ressort  &  dependance  de  votre  Cour  a 
peine  d'etre  traite  comme  Infractaire  &  rebel  aux  ^tats  unis, 
D'etre  meme  d^s  a  present  regarde  comme  traitre  a  vos  volontdes 
&  Constitutions,  moriginer  &  molester  en  tant  que  de  besoin  Le 
Nom^  benjamin  roger  habitant  au  meme  lieu  du  grand  ruisseau, 
pour  avoir  m^pris^  &  mal  parl6  de  la  Cour  ici  presente  En  Con- 
sequence Le  faire  transporter  par  devan  votre  ditte  Cour  Pour 
L'en  faire  retracter  &  lui  en  faire  Demander  &  prononcer  les 
Excuses  Suivant  L'dxigence  du  Cas  ou  telles  autres  Soumissions 
que  Jugeres  convenables  pour  la  Satisfaction  au  respect  qui 
apartien  a  votre  Cour,  apres  quoi  Messieurs  qu'il  vous  plaise  lui 
ordoner  reparation  Envers  Moi  de  la  Grievet^  de  Ses  Insultes 
dans  les  moments  Surtout  ou  Mon  devoir  m'obligeoit  de  Soutenir 
le  droit  I'honeur  &  I'interest  de  votre  auguste  Cour. 

et  pour  qui  les  choses  ayent  tout  L'effet  que  la  Surete  publique 
a  lieu  d'atendre  de  vos  bontes,  prendre  Conoissance  Messieurs  des 
motifs  qui  ont  done  lieu  aux  habitants  de  la  belle  fontaine  D'in- 
nover  une  Cour  independante  de  la  votre,  sans  autorite  a  cet 
effet,  sans  droits  sans  soumission  sans  reserve  &  sans  exception; 
(triste  presage  Messieurs  lorsque  le  Germe  de  I'honeur  a  besoin 
d'une  loy  plus  pressante  &  plus  proche  que  la  votre  pour  le  faire 

eclore), ou  bien  Messieurs  est  ce  pour 

prendre  chacun  Son  essort  ou  bien  encore  est  Ce  pour  enfreindre 
votre  Justice  &  vos  droits,  ou  plustot  Messieurs  en  S'eloignant  du 
Centre  de  votre  autorite  gravitante,  est  ce  pour  Secouer  le  joug 
&  mepriser  les  bontes  que  vous  aves  en  tout  tems  repandu  sur 
chaque  Individu;  voila  les  effets  de  la  reconoissance  que  vous 
offrent  ceux  que  la  nature  avare  a  transplants  dans  vos  climats 

puissiSs  vous  Messieurs  en  developan  vos  droits  &  votre  au- 
torite, faire  Germer,  dans  touts  les  Coeurs,  les  Sentiments  inal- 
terables  qu'inspirent  le  respect  &  I'attachemant  qui  est  du  a 
votre  auguste  Cour;  C'est  bein  Celui  Messieurs  qui  m 'oblige 
De  vous  dire  Combien  Je  ne  Cesserai  Jamais  d'etre  avec  tout 
Celui  qui  vous  apartien 

Messieurs  Le  plus  humble  et  le  plus  affectione  de  vos  cytoyens 

Aux  Cahokia  le  14  de  7^^"^  1787.  Robt.  Watts 


WATT'S  ADDRESS,  SEPTEMBER,  1787  603 

on  regarded  as  a  traitor  to  your  will  and  constitution ;  and  to  repri- 
mand and  punish,  in  so  far  as  there  is  need,  the  named  Benjamin 
Rogers,  inhabitant  of  the  same  place  of  Grand  Ruisseau,  for 
having  defied  and  badly  spoken  of  the  Court  here  present,  and 
consequently  to  have  him  brought  before  your  said  Court  in  order 
to  make  him  retract  and  to  make  demand  of  him  therefor  and 
to  cause  him  to  make  his  apology  according  to  the  exigences  of 
the  case,  or  to  do  such  other  acts  of  sumbission  as  you  shall  judge 
suitable  to  satisfy  the  respect  which  belongs  to  your  Court;  after 
which,  gentlemen,  that  it  please  you  to  order  him  to  make  repara- 
tion to  me  for  the  heinousness  of  his  insults  made  at  the  moment 
specially  when  my  duty  obliged  me  to  sustain  the  right,  honor 
and  interest  of  your  august  Court. 

And  in  order  that  the  affair  may  have  all  the  effect  which  the 
public  has  the  right  to  expect  from  your  benevolence,  I  hope  that 
you  will  take  cognizance,  gentlemen,  of  the  motives  which  have 
caused  the  inhabitants  of  Bellefontaine  to  inaugurate  a  court 
independent  of  your  own,  without  authority  to  do  so,  without 
rights,  without  reserve  and  without  pleas,  (sad  omen,  gentlemen, 
when  the  germ  of  honor  has  need  of  a  law  more  urgent  and  nearer 
than  yours  to  make  it  develop) ...  or  indeed,  gentlemen,  it  remains 
for  each  to  make  his  own  flight,  or  indeed,  again,  to  violate  your 
justice  and  your  rights,  or  rather,  gentlemen,  drawing  away  from 
the  center  of  your  weighty  authority,  to  shake  off  the  yoke  and  defy 
the  benevolence  which  you  have  at  all  times  diffused  for  all  pers- 
ons ;  such  are  the  consequences  of  the  gratitude,  which  those  whom 
miserly  nature  has  transplanted  into  your  climate,  are  offering  you. 

May  you  be  able.  Gentlemen,  by  developing  your  rights  and 
your  authority,  make  germinate  in  all  hearts  the  unalterable  senti- 
ments, which  inspire  the  respect  and  attachment  which  are  due 
your  august  Court!  It  is  indeed  that,  gentlemen,  which  obliges 
me  to  tell  to  you  how  I  shall  never  cease  to  be  in  all  that  which 
appertains  to  you, 

Gentlemen,  the  most  humble  and  affectionate  of 
your  citizens, 

At  Cahokia  September  14,  1787.  Robt.  Watts. 


6o4  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Sentence  against  Piggott  and  Rogers,  September  17,  1787. 
La  cour  du  district  des  Cohos  assemblee  Sur  Les  representa- 
tions a  elle  faites  par  le  S'"  Robert  Wath  commandant  Etably  par 
ladite  Cour,  au  grand  Ruisseau  en  datte  du  quatorze  de  ce  mois 
par  laquelle  il  nous  declare  et  nous  previent  de  L 'attentat  et 
insubordination  qui  tend  a  une  Conjuration  populaire  de  la  part 
des  habitants  americains  du  grand  Ruisseau  et  de  la  ballefontaine 
tendante  a  Se  Soustraire  a  la  justice  de  cette  Cour  et  L'aneantir 
par  la  suite,  En  Sarogeant  Sur  nos  terres  un  droit  d'independ- 
ance  Et  Envahir  notre  authorite  et  privileges  Et  Nomement  le 
nommee  Jacques  piquet  habitant  du  grand  Ruisseau  En  la  de- 
pendance  de  ce  district  acuse  de  S  'etre  immisse  En  magistra  et 
juge  de  paix  en  celle  pretendue  Soit  disante  jurisdiction  au  mepris 
de  notre  cour,  Et  le  nomme  Benjamain  Roger  aussi  habitant 
dud*  lieu  du  grand  Ruisseau  pour  avoir  meprise  par  termes  des- 
places  la  personne  du  S^  Wath  que  son  devoir  obligeoit  de  Soute- 
nir  nos  interest  et  les  droits  de  notre  Cour,  et  avoir  voulii  avillir 
nos  ordres.  Le  tout  examine  Et  considere  la  Cour  deffend  tres 
expressement  aud*  piquet  de  Sassembler  doresnavant  a  la  belle- 
fontaine  pour  y  tenir  aucunne  Seance  ny  former  aucunne  justice 
ny  mil  ice  independante  de  la  Cour  des  Cahos  a  peine  d'Etre 
Chasse  de  ce  district  et  Ses  Biens  Confisques  a  qui  il  apartiendra. 
Et  pour  avoir  accepte  dans  ladite  assemblee  tenue  entreux  Sans 
permission  ny  authorite  la  place  de  magistra  Et  juge  de  paix.  la 
cour  la  condamne  a  Etre  mis  aux  fers  En  ce  village  pendant 
lespace  de  vingt  quatre  heures  Et  condamne  a  pareille  peine  led* 
Benjamain  Roger  pour  son  manque  de  respect  tant  Enver  notre 
Cour.  que  enver  led*  S^  Wath  Lesquels  Seront  a  la  garde  de 
notre  huissier  a  leurs  frais  Et  fera  led*  Benjamain  Roger  excuses 
Convenables  la  Cour  presente  aud*  S^  Wath  ce  qui  sera  execute 
donne  En  Cour  le  dix  sept  Septembre  mil  sept  Cent  quatre  vingt 
Sept.  Signe  -  pierre  Laperche  -  B*^  Saucier  -  Philipe  Engel  - 
ducharme  -  fs  Saucier  presidant. 

Labuxiere  grefier. 

La  presente  Sentence  a  Ete  Execute  le  meme  jour 
Cotte  L  Invre  soixante  quinzieme 

1  Menard  Col.,  Tardiveau  Papers,  original  manuscript.    Transcription  by  the  editor. 


THE  COURT'S  JUDGMENT,  SEPTEMBER,  1787       605 

The  Sentence  against  Piggott  and  Rogers,  Sept.  17, 1787.^ 
The  Court  of  the  District  of  Cahokia  assembled,  on  the 
fourteenth  of  this  month,  to  hear  the  representations  made  to  it  by 
M.  Robert  Watts,  commandant  estabUshed  by  the  said  Court  at 
Grand  Ruisseau,  in  which  he  makes  accusation  in  informing  us 
of  the  outrage  and  insubordination,  which  tend  to  a  popular  con- 
spiracy on  the  part  of  the  inhabitants  of  Grand  Ruisseau  and 
Bellefontaine,  in  order  to  escape  from  the  jurisdiction  of  this 
Court  and  to  annihilate  it  finally,  by  arrogating  to  themselves  a 
right  of  independence  on  our  lands  and  by  encroaching  on  our 
authority  and  privileges ;  and  he  has  accused  especially  the  named 
James  Piggott  inhabitant  of  Grand  Ruisseau,  in  the  dependency 
of  this  district,  of  having  thrust  himself  into  the  ofl&ce  of  magis- 
trate and  justice  of  the  peace  in  this  pretended  and  would-be 
jurisdiction  to  the  defiance  of  our  Court;  and  the  named  Benjamin 
Rogers,  also  inhabitant  of  Grand  Ruisseau,  of  having  scorned  by 
offensive  terms  the  person  of  M.  Watts,  whom  his  duty  compelled 
to  support  our  interests  and  the  rights  of  our  Court,  and  of  having 
wished  to  dishonor  our  orders :  after  all  was  examined  and  con- 
sidered, the  Court  forbids  very  expressively  the  said  Piggott  to 
call  assemblies  henceforth  at  Bellefontaine  for  the  purpose  of 
holding  any  session  there  or  of  devising  any  justice  or  militia 
independent  of  the  Court  of  Cahokia,  on  pain  of  being  driven  from 
this  district  and  of  the  confiscation  of  his  property,  for  whom  it 
shall  concern ;  and  for  having  accepted  the  position  of  magistrate 
and  justice  of  the  peace  in  the  said  assembly,  held  by  the  people 
without  permission  or  authority,  the  Court  has  condemned  him 
to  be  placed  in  irons  in  this  village  for  the  space  of  twenty-four 
hours;  and  it  condemns  to  a  like  punishment  the  said  Benjamin 
Rogers  for  his  lack  of  respect  both  towards  our  Court  and  tow^ards 
the  said  M.  Watts ;  and  they  shall  be  in  the  custody  of  our  huissier 
at  their  own  expense;  and  the  said  Benjamin  Rogers  shall  make 
in  the  presence  of  the  Court  suitable  apologies  to  the  said  M. 
Watts;  for  which  there  will  be  execution.  Given  in  Court  the 
seventeenth  of  September,  1787.  Signed,  Pierre  Laperche,  Bte. 
Saucier,  Philippe  Engel,  DuCharme,  Fr.  Saucier,  president. 
Labuxiere,  Clerk. 
The  present  sentence  has  been  executed  the  same  day. 
Page  L,  inventory  seventy-five. 


6o6  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Ordinance  of  the  Court  of  Cahokia,  July  5,  1789. 
De  la  part  de  la  Cour  du  district  des  Cahos. 

La  Cour  ayant  examine  que  les  circonstances  ou  se  trouve  ce 
village  par  les  mauvaises  intentions  ou  Sont  les  Sauvages  contre 
nous  qui  Se  manifestent  depuis  longtems,  tant  par  1  'assassin  de 
plusieurs  personnes  aux  Environs  de  ce  village  que  par  1  'Enleve- 
ment continuel  de  nos  chevaux  et  autres  insultes  commises  par 
ces  Barbares  aux  quelles  il  nous  est  presque  impossible  de  nous 
oposer  par  le  manque  de  force;  nous  trouvant  continuement  ex- 
poses a  la  fureur  des  partis  qui  viennent  journellement  Sur  nos 
terres  et  Sur  les  chemains,  pour  y  tuer  et  enlever  les  chevaux 
ce  qui  expose  les  habitans  a  etre  massacrez  en  faisant  leurs 
travaux  Et  nous  met  hors  d  'etat  de  pouvoir  Sortir  Sans  courir  les 
Risques  de  la  vie. 

Cest  pour  prfevenir  les  dangers  ou  nous  sommes  exposez  par 
les  sauvages  qui  viennent  en  ce  village  Sous  le  voile  de  L 'union 
et  de  L'amitie  et  qui  en  S'en  retournant,  tuent,  pillent,  et  En- 
levent  les  chevaux  que  la  cour  cherche  les  moyens  de  Remedier 
aux  malheurs  qui  nous  Environnent. 

a  cette  fin  par  deliberation  de  laditte  cour  elle  fait  expresse- 
ment  deffences  a  toutes  personnes  de  telles  qualite  et  condi- 
tions et  profession  quelles  soient  et  Sous  tel  pretexte  que  ce 
puisse  etre  Sans  pouvoir  aleguer  aucunes  raisons;  de  vendre 
traiter  ni  debiter  aucunes  Boissons  Enivrantes  aux  Sauvages  qui 
viendront  au  poste  des  Cahos  Soit  tafia  ou  autres  liqueurs  que  ce 
puisse  etre,  faisons  aussi  deffences  de  leur  traitter  de  la  poudre, 
Balles,  munitions  et  armes  non  pas  meme  en  present  a  peine 
de  cent  piastres  demande  payable  contant  Sans  moderation,  de 
confiscation  des  Boissons,  poudre,  munitions  et  armes  qui  Se 
trouveront  ches  eux  pour  vendre  Et  d  'etre  chassez  de  ce  district 
a  perpetuite  Sans  esperance  de  pouvoir  y  revenir  Enjoint  ladite 
Cour  a  tous  ceux  qui  auront  connoissance  des  contrevenants  de 
nous  en  avertir  ou  de  les  declarer  au  greffe  a  peine  de  se  rendre 
complice  Et  ceux  qui  reserveront  des  Sauvages  ches  eux  seront 
tenus  den  avertir  le  commandant  a  peine  de  prison  aussi  tost  leur 
arrivee  ce  qui  sera  execute  et  la  presente   sera  lue  publi^e  Et 


ORDINANCE,  JULY,  1789  607 

Ordinance  of  the  Court  of  Cahokia,  July  5,  1789.^ 
On  the  part  of  the  Court  of  the  District  of  Cahokia. 

The  Court  having  considered  that  the  circumstances  in  which 
this  village  finds  itself  on  account  of  the  evil  purposes  which  the 
savages  have  against  us,''  which  are  shown,  since  a  long  time,  both 
by  the  assassination  of  several  persons  in  the  neighborhood  of 
this  village  and  by  the  continual  stealing  of  our  horses  and  by 
other  insults  committed  by  these  barbarians,  to  whom  it  is  almost 
impossible  to  make  opposition  on  account  of  the  lack  of  military 
force;  and  finding  ourselves  continually  exposed  to  the  fury  of 
the  parties,  which  come  daily  on  our  lands  and  roads  for  the 
purpose  of  killing  persons  there  and  of  stealing  the  horses,  which 
exposes  the  inhabitants  to  being  massacred  while  at  work  and 
makes  it  impossible  for  us  to  go  out  without  risking  our  lives: 

It  is  to  prevent  the  dangers  to  which  we  are  exposed  from  the 
savages  who  come  to  this  village  under  the  veil  of  union  and 
friendship  and  who,  on  returning,  kill,  pillage  and  steal  the  horses, 
that  the  Court  seeks  means  to  remedy  the  evils  which  surround  us. 

To  this  end,  by  resolution  of  the  said  Court,  it  is  expressly 
forbidden  all  persons  of  what  quality,  condition  and  profession 
soever  and  under  any  pretext  whatsoever,  without  the  possibility 
of  excuse,  to  sell,  trade  or  sell  at  retail  to  the  savages  any  intoxicat- 
ing liquors  of  any  sort ;  we  forbid  also  trading  with  them  in  pow- 
der, bullets,  ammunition  and  arms  or  giving  them  even  as  pres- 
ents, on  pain  of  one  hundred  piastres  fine  payable  in  cash  with 
out  mitigation  and  of  confiscation  of  the  liquors,  powder,  ammuni- 
tion and  arms,  which  shall  be  found  at  their  houses  for  sale,  and 
of  being  driven  from  this  district  forever  without  hope  of  being 
able  to  return.  The  said  Court  enjoins  all  those  who  shall  have 
knowledge  of  offenders  to  inform  us  thereof  or  to  denounce  them 
at  the  office,  on  pain  of  rendering  themselves  accomplices;  and 
those  who  receive  savages  at  their  house  shall  be  held  to  notify 
the  commandant  thereof  as  soon  as  they  arrive,  on  pain  of 
prison,  for  which  there  will  be  execution;  and  the  present  shall 

1  Chi.  Hist.  Soc,  Cah.  Rec,  original  manuscript.    Transcription  by  the  editor. 

2  At  the  close  of  this  period  there  was  ahuost  continuous  Indian  war. 


6o8  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

affichee  demain  dimanche  a  la  porte  de  leglise  aux  Cahos  le  5 
juillet,  1789. 

Sa  hBi  fr  Trottier 

Louis  +  Chatel  Philipe  Engel  At  Girardin. 

marque  Pierre  Laperche 

DuCharme 


ORDINANCE,  JULY,  1789  609 

be  read,  published  and  posted  to-morrow,  Sunday,  on  the  door 
of  the  church  of  Cahokia,  July  5,  1789. 
[Signed] 
his 
Louis  +  Chatel  hBi  F.Trottier. 

mark  Philippe  Engel.  Ant.  Girardin. 

DuCharme.  Pierre  Laperche. 


CAHOKIA  DOCUMENTS. 

ENGLISH 

Joseph  Bowman  to  G.  R.  Clark  ^ 

Kahous  May  28*^  1779 
Dear  Sir 

I  Received  you  letter  by  M^  Charleville  Which  affords  me 
the  Greatest  satisfaction  to  hear  of  The  Arivel  of  Coll°  Mon- 
gomery  &  his  success  that  I  now  can  Rest  Contentedly  with 
Reguard  to  haveing  success  on  our  Intended  Expedition.  Our 
old  saying  was  Everything  Happens  for  the  best,  had  CoP  Mon- 
gomery  arived  soon^  perhaps  he  wood  have  been  Expencive 
with  Reguar  to  provisons  I  Expect  we  shall  be  furnish^  with 
Every  Necessary  Requir^  from  this  Post  without  makeing  use  of 
the  Last  Argument  which  affords  me  the  greatist  Pleasure  to  find 
that  the  Inhabitans  seame  desireous  of  furnishing  what  Lies  in 
their  Power,  which  I  hope  will  Recommend  them  much  to  your 
Honour,  M^  Shannon  will  Write  to  you  more  fulley  upon  that 
Head. 

M^  Langtoe^  is  Just  Arived  with  all  the  good  news  We  could 
Expect  from  above  and  will  be  with  you  in  A  few  days.  Peace 
&  Quietness  seams  to  be  Establish^  Amongst  the  Indians  in 
General,  I  have  Just  now  Dismist  a  party  of  the  Pottewottemies 
with  Content  &c.  be  Assure'^  of  a  Company  of  Vollenteers  from 
here  &  Expect  the  Same  with  you :  I  am  D^  S^  with  Respect  your 
&c. 

Jo^  Bowman 

[Addressed] 
ColP  Go.  R  Clark  Esq'"  Commander 

in  Cheif  of  the  western  Department 
Pr  M^  Pappae        Kaskaskia 

^Dr.  MSS.,  49J45,  original  manuscript. 
2Linctot. 

r.io 


BOWMAN'S  LETTERS  ^  6ii 

Bowman  to  G.  R.  Clark* 

Kahous  May  28*^  1779 
Dr  Sir, 

It  gives  me  Pleasure  to  Inform  you  of  the  bravery  of  the  Volen- 
teers  at  this  Place  that  after  aplication  was  made  to  them  for  their 
Assistance,  in  less  than  twenty  four  Hours  turnd  out  A  Company 
larger  than  the  other  who  hath  Chosen  M^  Langto  for  their  Capt" 
they  with  a  few  others  that  are  Ingag^  for  Bullock  Driveing  &c 
amounts  to  forty  odd  men  notwithstanding  twenty  odd  of  the  Last 
Companey  of  Volenteers  are  Away,  that  had  not  that  been  the  case 
I  wood  have  asure^  You  60  men  at  Least.  It  was  with  great 
dificulty  I  Could  Restrain  maney  of  the  old  Married  people  from 
turning  out  With  us  as  I  New  the  Circumstance  of  their  families 
would  Not  Permitt  them  to  be  absent.  I  think  you  may  depend  on 
fifty  at  aney  Rate;  At  first  I  was  afraid  Cap*^  Langtoes  Appoint- 
ment would  Interfair  with  his  other  buisness.  but  —  As  he  seams 
desireous  to  take  his  Rout  by  way  of  the  Islinois  River  and  to  meet 
us  at  Ouiaws  on  the  wabash  in  order  to  Recruit  more  m^h  I  think 
it  wood  answr  Every  purpose  we  could  Requir,  which  Rout  I  hope 
youl  grant  him  unless  you  should  think  it  Quite  Inconsistant. 
He  farder  purposes  to  purchace  about  forty  Horses  on  his  way  for 
the  state  which  will  be  wanting  in  case  the  waters  Should  be  low, 
the  Horses  mought  be  purchased  to  a  —  Considerable  Advantage, 
if  so  he  will  Require  some  goods  And  Taffee  for  his  Voyage;  he  has 
furnish'i  us  with  some  pelteries  which  is  Apply^  for  the  use  of  pur- 
chaceing  provisions  &c.  he  will  wait  upon  you  to  Receive  Your 
Orders.  In  order  to  Direct  himself  Accordingly  he  brought  down 
five  or  Six  Horses  wich  he  has  Delivered  to  Cap*^  Shannon  but 
None  that  would  answer  you  so  well  as  your  Own,  As  to  a  state  of 
Provisions  &c;  you^  be  inform^  by  Cap*'^  Shannon;  If  nothing 
Particular  should  Call  for  me  I  shall  wait  your  farder  orders,  as 
my  Presence  here  will  be  much  require^  with  Regaurd  to  forward- 
ing Every  thing  from  this  Place  —  If  aney  thing  Else  should  be 
Requir^  you^  be  Please*^  to  Acquaint  me,  the  measure  I  am 
Oblig^  to,  At  Present  does  not  altogether  agree  with  my  Constitu- 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  49J46,  original  manuscript.  Preparations  we.-e  beia;?  made  for  the  proposed 
expedition  against  Detroit. 


6i2  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

tion  for  you  may  depend  upon  it  that  I  have  Not  been  Idle,  I  have 
Inclos^  you  a  Coppy  of  the  Inventory  of  Every  article  that  I  have 
taken  out  of  the  Contine  tie  [MS.  imperjed]  Store  at  S*  Louis 
which  I  drew  from  my  Rec  ts  [MS.  imperfect]  &  afterwards 

Presenting  of  it  to  M^  Bosalee  he  Refused  to  take  it,  for  what 
Reason  I  know  not. 

My  Compliments  to  Col°  Mongomery  and  the  Gentlemen 
Officers  Likewise  to  the  Volenteers  and  am  In  hopes  to  find  them 
air  in  Readiness  for  a  march. 

I  am  D^  S^  your  most  Obd^  friend  &  Humb^  Se^ 

Jo^  Bowman 
[Addressed] 
ColP  G.  R.  Clark  Esqr. 

Commander  in  Cheif  of  the  western  Department 

Kaskaskias 
Received  31st  of  May  1779 
Bowman  to  G.  R.  Clark  ^ 

Kahous  June  3^.  1779 
Dear  Sir 

By  the  bearer  M^ I  have  Just  received  the  follow- 
ing Inteligence  from  Micha^  M^anoy^  who  Informs  me  that  he 
left  that  the  8^  of  April  Last  with  permition  to  go  as  far  as  Labai 
with  orders  to  Longloid  &  Gouchey  from  Maj^  Depoister  forbiding 
them  from  Raising  aney  more  Indians  against  the  americans  that 
Maj^  Depoister  has  but  forty  men  and  100  at  Detroit  by  Report, 
the  Indians  Informes  them  of  our  armey  beeing  near  Detroit  that 
in  two  days  they  Can  fetch  in  a  scalp  from  our  People,  he  on  his 
way  here  Receiv'^  the  kindest  treatment  from  the  Indians  who  seam 
Intirely  dispos*^  in  our  favor  he  has  brought  with  him  a  large 
Quantity  of  goods  that  was  Conceald  to  him  by  M^  Bentley  who 
was  to  start  in  ten  days  after  him  in  case  he  could  obtain  A  permitt 
otherways  he  wood  make  his  Escape  the  best  way  he  could 

I  begin  to  be  Impatiant  to  start  and  am  In  hopes  by  Next  mon- 
day  to  make  a  move  with  Everything  from  here  with  hoops  of 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  49J49,  original  manuscript. 
^  Michillimackinac. 


BOWMAN'S  LETTERS  613 

finding  you  all  in  Readiness  for  a  start  which  I  make  not  the  least 
doubt  of;  if  in  case  your  purchacers  has  been  as  buis  [MS.  torn] 
Imploy^  as  we  where.  I  expect  Mr  Shannon  back  Every  hour. 
The  weather  begins  to  grow  warm  &  the  waters  Low  so  that  no 
time  Ought  to  be  lost  with  regaurd  to  preparing  Every  Necessary 
required  for  oiu:  Expedition,  pray  make  Every  officer  Exert  himself 
as  I  have  been  obliged  to  do,  as  much  depends  on  Industry,  their 
is  maney  Thanks  to  be  paid  to  the  Inhabitants  here,  as  they  have 
Spaird  their  Cattle  &  Horses  past  Expectation  they  have  furnish^ 
Every  fifth  head  of  Cattle  instead  of  the  tenth,  which  amounts  to 
80  odd  40  odd  Horses  &  150000  ^^  of  Flower  with  [MS.  torn]  ing 
to  press  one  thing. 

The  reason  of  not  getting  more  Flower  from  this  Place  is  owing 
to  the  scarceity,  as  their  has  been  sold  out  of  this  town  since  your 
Departure  from  here  between  twenty  and  thirty  Thousand  weight 
I  am  afraid  that  Unless  you  send  up  a  boat  for  the  flower  I  shall 
be  disappointed  I  have  had  the  offer  of  severl  Bark  boats  but  none 
of  them  in  order,  or  strong  Enough  to  trust  A  Load  in, 

My  respects  to  the  Gentlemen  officers  whilst  I  remain  D^  S^ 
your  most  Obd*  friend  &  Hum^®  Se^ 

Jo^  Bowman 

N  B  in  my  letter  instead  of  orders  forbiding  the  Indians  to  be 
rais^  against  the  Americans  they  are  cauld  for  to  Micha^  M^'anoy 
to  a  counsel. 

[Addressed]     CoP  George  Rogers  Clark 

Command^  in  cheif  of  wes^™  Depr* 
pr  M^  pravoe  Kaskasias 

Received  5*^  June  79 

Bowman  to  G.  R.  Clark.  ^ 

Kahous  June  6*^  1779 
Dear  Sir 

I  Expected  to  start  from  here  tomorrow  but  finding  that  the 
man  who  was  appointed  by  Mr.  Lacroix  to  Brand  all  the  Cattle 
as  they  were  Purchased  had  done  it  in  such  a  manner  that  out  of 
Eighty  head  their  does  not  appear  the  Brands  of  above  twenty  so 

; ;.     1  Dr.  MSS.,  49J51.  original  manuscript. 


6i4  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

that  we  shall  now  have  near  as  much  trouble  Collecting  of  them 
from  the  (liferent  Inhabitants  as  in  Purchasing  of  them  at  first; 
Also  M^  Shannons  not  Returning  according  to  Promise,  as  well  as 
the  want  of  a  boat  or  Boats  to  transport  the  flower  from  here,  has 
disappointed  me  Intireley ;  I  should  be  glad  you  would  let  me  know 
what  day  you  Intend  to  start  so  that  I  may  be  able  to  direct  Every 
thing  Accordingly;  I  should  at  Least  want  to  be  at  Kaskaskias 
three  Days  before  hand  in  order  to  settle  my  accounts  &  Con- 
searns  of  my  Companey. 

M^  Parault  addresses  himself  to  me  to  go  with  us  on  the  Ex- 
pedition Observing  that  he  beeing  A  Cripple  &  the  Imployment 
he  is  now  in  does  not  Afford  him  sufl&cient  Livelyhood,  on  account 
of  his  Imployer  not  haveing  Merchendise  Sufficient  for  traid  as  to 
afford  him  better  wages. 

But  at  the  same  time  his  Imployer  beeing  Willing  to  advance  to 
the  said  Perault  a  Quantity  of  Liquors  &c  provided  You  would 
grant  him  permition  to  act  as  a  setler  to  the  Ridgements  as  well  as 
your  pertection  otherways.  I  have  therefore  Recommended  him 
to  you  to  know  whether  you  will  Grant  him  that  Permition  or  not. 

I  have  furnish^  him  with  one  of  the  state  Horses  which  you  will 
be  Pleas^  to  keep  and  let  him  have  another  to  Return  with  if  you 
should  think  proper,  I  have  also  sent  annother  state  Horse  by 
Battist  Allerey  which  is  to  be  Delivered  to  the  Packhorsmaster, 
if  aney. 

I  am  D^  S^  your  most  Obd^  friend  &  Humb^  Se^. 

Jo^  Bowman 
McCarty  to  Todd,  September  i8,  1779.^ 
Sir 

I  am  under  the  Necessity  of  informing  you  of  what  Party  of 
the  Inhabitants  of  this  Village  hath  been  Guilty  of  in  Destroying 
a  Part  of  my  Stock  the  Quantity  I  cannot  Ascertain;  having  been 
called  out  on  the  Service  of  my  Country  in  January  last  and  always 
Since  been  Obliged  to  attend  the  Service,  to  the  prejudice  of  my 
own;  I  could  not  lay  in  a  Sufficiency  of  Provisions  &c.  for  the 
Subsistence  thereof  unless  let  run  in  the  woods  about  my  Settle- 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  49J72,  origiaal  manuscript. 


MCCARTY'S  LETTERS  615 

ment  Six  Milles  Distant  from  this  town,  the  People  of  this  Village 
have  Sowen  Grain  out  in  the  open  fields  &  meadows  without  Any 
fence  or  inclosure  to  preserve  it  as  I  am  at  Such  a  Distance  from 
this  Village  it  cannot  be  Supposed  that  I  have  any  Connections 
with  them  in  the  Town  Laws  Concerning  their  Commons,  as  I  am 
Quite  on  the  other  Side  of  them  It  would  be  very  Rediculous  to 
Suppose  that  If  any  Person  Should  take  it  in  their  heads  to  Sow 
Grain  in  any  Part  of  the  Lands  between  this  and  Post  Vincent 
without  any  inclosure  and  have  a  Right  to  Shoot  any  mans  Cattle 
hogs  &c.  should  they  find  out  such  a  field  and  Enter  it. 

I  dont  see  yet  through  the  Designe  of  a  few  Dispicable  Inhabit- 
ants who  say  they  are  authorized  by  you,  to  parade  themselves 
in  the  fields  Destroying  My  property  when  there  is  Numbers  of 
other  hogs  in  the  Same  place  that  are  as  fauctious  as  Mine 
Whither  it  is  because  I  command  a  party  of  of  the  State  Troops 
hear  or  not,  perhaps  they  want  us  away.  Indeed  unless  there  is 
Soon  a  Change  made  for  the  Better  me  nor  my  Soldiers  will  have 
no  Buissiness  hear,  Neither  can  we  Stay  half  Naked,  what  we  are 
paid  with  Call'd  down  by  the  Civil  power;  with  what  can  we  get 
our  Neccessaries  of  Life;  as  long  as  I  had  any  thing  in  my  hands 
I  furnished  it  for  the  Service,  but  at  this  rate  it  will  not  be  long  in 
my  power  to  Subsist,  when  my  Stock  is  Shot  down  in  the  Open 
fields  and  no  redress  to  be  had  in  this  Country;  Neither  do  I  kno' 
the  Laws  you  have  Established.  I  am  Sir  with  Respect  Your 
most  obed*  &  very  Hum^  Serv* 

Cahos  18  7^^  1779  Richard  M'^Carty 

To 

Col°.  Todd 

McCarty  to  Montgomery,  Sept.  19,  1779.^ 
Sir 

Since  you  left  us  my  men  Desert  dayly.  they  are  Continually 
with  me  to  Cloath  them  or  give  them  there  Discharge,  that  they 
may  Cloath  themselves  I  have  trouble  enough  with  them  and 
have  thought  could  we  Contrive  a  Method  by  the  intermission 
of  M^  Bourgard  to  Satisfie  them  for  the  present  for  If  Something 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  49J7 1,  original  manuscript. 


6i6  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

is  not  done,  they  will  all  leave  me  Except  my  English  who  are 
the  least  Clamourous,  yet  they  Complaine,  and  Colo.  Todds 
Residence  here  will  Spoil  the  people  intirely  for  the  Inhabi- 
tants no  more  Regard  us  then  a  Parcel  of  Slaves.  Neither 
do  I  chuse  to  do  any  thing  yet  Soldiers  &  people  Disatisfied, 
you  may  think  what  a  poor  life  your  humble  Serv*  hath.  My 
Schem  is  to  purchase  as  much  Strouds  as  will  make  a  short  jacket, 
and  a  pair  of  long  Trowsers  to  each  man,  the  jacket  to  have  a 
red  Cuff  turned  up  by  which  they  will  be  uniform  it  will  take  2J 
Ells  to  each  man  and  there  is  no  Hats  we  can  make  them  caps, 
for  Shoes  we  must  Shift  with  Mogasins.  M^  Ceres  has  linnen 
two  Suppos  we  furnish  each  man  with  one  Shirt  untill  Better 
turns  out  — M^  Ceres  asks  15^^  in  Peletries  p^^  Ells,  15!^  d°  P^ 
Shirt  &c.  It  will  be  A  Terrible  Price  to  the  State  but  yet  it  will 
be  perhaps  better  to  pay  that  then  have  in  a  few  days  no  Soldiers 
which  I  think  will  Shortly  be  the  Case  If  Some  Such  Method  is 
not  taken. 

M*  Perault  will  tell  you  our  Situation  and  what  the  Result 
would  be  in  case  of  an  attack. 

I  think  it  would  be  a  happy  thing  could  we  get  Colo^  Todd 
out  of  the  Country  for  he  will  possitively  Sett  the  Inhabitants 
and  us  by  the  Ears.  I  have  wrote  him  a  pretty  Sharp  Letter  on 
his  Signing  a  Death  Warrant  against  My  poor  hogs  for  Runing 
in  the  Oppen  fields.  I  hear  inclose  a  Copy  of  it — on  Some  Com- 
plaints by  the  Inhabitants  the  other  day  he  wished  that  there 
was  not  a  Soldier  in  the  Country  I  wish  so  two  provided  we  were 
any  where  else  to  do  Something  for  we  are  but  poor  fellow's  now. 
If  you  approve  of  this  I  beg  you  will  give  me  an  Answer  as  Soon 
possible  for  perhaps  If  two  days  Retarding  may  even  put  it  out 
of  our  power  to  even  procure  this  I  have  never  Seen  the  people 
of  this  place  So  Mutinous  as  they  are  by  the  Encouragement  of 
Colo^.  Todd,  for  they  even  begin  to  threaten  to  turn  my  men  out 
of  Doors  and  god  knows  what  I  shall  do  If  they  do  for  we  are  not 
Above  20  Strong  and  them  Sick  that  I  could  depend  on  So  they 
may  Starve  us  if  they  like  I  am  Sir  with  Compliments  to  the 
Gent^  Your  Most  Obed^  and  very  Hum  Serv* 

Richard  Mc.  Ca  [MS.  torn] 


TODD  TO  GRATIOT,  DECEMBER,  1779  617 

Ca  19*^  Sep^.  1779 

[MS.  torn.] 
My  People  just  are  come  in  and  give  me  an  acco*  of  fourteen 
Hogs  killed  &  wounded,    four  of  which  they  have  brought  to 
town  and  Sold  amongst  them  there  are  Several  Sowes  Just  ready 
to  Pig.    at  least  my  loss  is  Estimated  at  1400^^  in  Peletries. 
[Addressed]         ^  on  the  Service 

To 

Colo^  Jn°.  Montgomery  Command.g 
the  Illinois    &c    &c    Sic  at 
By  favour  of  Fort  Clark 

Lt  Perault 

Todd  to  Gratiot.^ 

Falls  of  Ohio,  Deer  19th,  1779. 
Sir: 

I  am  safely  arrived  here  without  Occurrence  of  moment. 
Wishing  you  Health  &  Appetite  for  your  Girl  &  Glass  I  pro- 
ceed to  explain  the  Business  of  this  Letter. 

I  expect  to  return  again  to  the  post  in  Feb.  or  March  &  perhaps 
to  Cohos  &  request  you  to  purchase  upon  the  best  terms  you  can 
any  Quantity  of  Lead  not  exceeding  5000  lb  &  send  it  to  Capt. 
Winston  to  be  lodged  with  him  one  half)  &  the  other  sent  to  me  at 
the  commanding  officer  at  the  Falls  by  the  first  Oppy.  I  will 
satisfy  you  for  your  Trouble  &  repay  you  —  pray  do  not  be  scru- 
pulous concerning  the  payment  of  debts  contracted  in  behalf  of  the 
State.  Rest  assured  that  rewards  are  in  store  for  the  spirited  pa- 
triot who  will  act  nobly  in  her  cause  —  I  hope  your  future  conduct 
will  tally  with  your  past  &  you  need  not  the  Favor  of  Government. 
I  sincerely  wish  you  Happiness  &  am  your  Mo.  Obedt  Servt 
Compliments  to  the  officers,  Jno.  Todd  Jr. 

military  &  Civil,  &  all  friends, 

J.  T.  • 

[Addressed]  Charles  Gratiot,  Esq.,  of  Kohokia. 


1  In  possession  of  Mrs.  Armand  Peugnet  of  St.  Louis,  Mo.,  a  descendant  of  Charles 
Gratiot.  Original  manuscript.  Transcription  by  Miss  Mary  Louise  Dalton  of  Mo.  Hist. 
Soc.,  St.  Louis. 


6i8  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

McCarty  to  Clark.  ^ 

Cascakia  14*^  Octo^  1780 
Sir 

I  have  so  many  things  to  Inform  you  of  I  dont  kno'  Rightly 
where  to  begin;  being  an  Intire  Stranger  to  the  Intentions  and 
designes  of  Government,  for  this  Country;  however  as  I  imagine, 
what  has  and  is  goeing  on  hear  Regards  you  in  Part  I  think  it 
my  Duty  to  Inform  you  thereof  as  far  as  comes  to  my  knowledge; 
and  this  by  way  of  Journal — 

Extract  from  M^Carty's  Journal.     Cascakia. 

"The  27^^  July  M^.  Bentley  arrived  from  Au  Post,^  and  Say's 
there  is  a  french  Officer  arrived  there  call'd  Colo^  Dela  Balme ' 
and  that  he  Said  the  french  intends  fighting  Both  the  English 
&  Big  knife,  he  Said  to  the  Inhabitants  why  dont  you  drive 
these  Vagabonds  away.  Speaking  of  our  Troops;  that  the  Best 
way  to  get  Quit  of  'em  was  not  to  furnish  them  any  Provisions 
&c.  in  a  a  Council  with  the  Indians  had  told  them  he  Re- 
commended there  Sending  immedeat  advice  to  the  Shawnese 
that  Colo^  Clark  was  going  against  them,  and  that  If  he  was  a 
Little  Bird,  we  would  flye  and  tell  them;  Colo^  Montgomery  being 
at  Cahos  and  only  Capt.  Rogers  and  myself  hear,  we  waited  on 
Mr.  Bentley  and  beged  of  him  a  Circumstantial  acco^  of  this  man 
in  writing  that  Colo^  Montgomery  might  be  assured  of  what  was 
goeing  on,  which  M^  Bentley  said  he  could  not  give  having  it 
only  from  hearseay  But  that  Mr  Dalton  had  wrote  to  Colo^  Mont- 
gomery an  acco*  thereof. 

Cap^  Roger's  &  Self  went  up  to  Caho's  arrived  the  29*^  and 
Informed  Colo^  of  it  &  Delivered  Dal  tons  Letter;  The  Inhabi- 
tants presented  a  petition  to  Colo.  Montgomery  to  be  eased  of 
a  part  of  the  Troops,  and  to  have  them  equally  devided  in  the 
Other  Village,  Colo^  M.  Refused  to  devide  the  Troops  and  will 
Evacuate  the  Country  intirely  I  with  Several  Other  Officers  de- 
sire a  Council  thereon  before  done  but  were  Not  barkened  to. 

1  Dr.  MSS.,  50J66,  original  manuscript. 

2  Vincennes. 

3  For  an  account  of  De  la  Balme,  see  Introduction,  pp.  Ixxxix.  et  seq. 


MCCARTY'S  JOURNAL  619 

Colo^  went  off  to  Cascakia  30*^  Gave  orders  to  march  in  8  day's 
Our  men  are  very  near  all  Sick,  Some  dies  &c. 

Sunday  3*^  Lt.  Girault  arrived  from  Cascakia  with  News  that 
Camp  Jefferson  was  besiged  and  with  Orders  for  All  the  Troops 
to  March  for  to  give  it  Succour,  we  have  only  one  Boat  of  the  State 
hear  and  that  impossible,  for  it  to  Swim  up  Unless  Mended,  no  Pitch 
nor  Oak'um,  Major  Williams  gave  orders  Munday  the  4*^  for 
me  to  go  with  all  the  Men  able,  to  its  Succour.  I  got  Boat  mended 
with  old  rags  as  well  as  could  be,  but  was  obliged  to  have  it  Sunk 
to  try  to  make  it  tight,  the  5th  had  the  Boat  loaded  but  was  obliged 
to  unload  her,  it  Sinking  and  was  obliged  to  Press  all  the  Little 
Boats  to  the  N°  of  five  to  Carry  Men  &  Provisions  and  Sett  of 
about  2  O'clock  camped  at  Marramack  to  wait  for  the  rear; 
all  came  up  at  Sundown  No  Ma  [MS.  torn.]  Night  boats  Small 
&  Mississippi  low.  the  6*^  passed  Missere^  M'"  Valley  gave 
my  people  22  loaves  of  Bread,  obliged  to  Leave  Seven  Sick  Men 
not  being  able  to  help  themselves,  and  Sent  word  to  Kennedy  at 
Cascakia  to  have  them  taken  care  of,  the  State  having  a  Store 
there;  23  Indians  from  Missere  followed  me  without  being  asked, 
&  we  were  33  men  &  officers  Cap"  Keller  very  Sick  the  8*^  met 
M^  Sarpys  Boat  at  the  Ohio,  all  well-Indians  Gone  &°.  Got 
into  the  Mouth  of  Chanel  of  fort  Jefferson  at  3  O' Clock  afternoon 
M^  Dalton  arrived  about  2  hours  after  me  from  auposte  having 
Evacuated  it.  The  whole  people  here  are  Sick  a  General  Mur- 
mur Children  Dicing  fast.  Numbers  of  the  Inhabitants  goeing 
off,  the  Enemy  having  Distroyed  their  Corn  pumkins.  Cattle 
horses  &c.  Colo^  Montgomery  and  Sundry  of  the  Officers  de- 
sired me  to  draw  up  a  writing  Setting  forth  the  Situation  of  the 
place  &c. 

the  11^^  held  a  Council  where  it  was  Generally  desided  to 
Change  the  Situation  of  the  place  or  to  export  all  State  Stores  &c. 
up  to  the  Illenois  Untill  things  Should  be  Better  prepared  for  the 
Establishing  Said  Place 

The  13*^;  Sett  of  to  Return  to  Islenois,  and  I  endeavoured  to 
Bring  up  What  Boats  I  could  of  those  pressed  at  Cahos  but  was 

1  Ste.  Genevieve. 


620  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

hinderd,  we  have  nothing  to  eat  but  Corn  without  Grece  or  Salt 
Much  Murmuring  Amongst  the  Troops,  arrived  at  Cascakia  the 
20*^  Myself  very  Sick,  Colo^  Mont^  &  Dodge  &c  arrived  a  day 
before  by  Land  Colo^  Dela  Balme  is  Arrived  hear  from  auposte 
with  an  Escorte  of  30  men  french  and  Indians  and  is  now  at 
Cahos  &  S*  Louis  he  arrived  from  Cahos  did  not  wait  on  Colo^ 
Montgomery  nor  Colo^  Montgomery  on  him  the  People  in  Gen- 
eral Seem  to  be  Changed  towards  us  and  Many  things  Said  Un- 
fitting. M^  Dodge  hath  discoverd  that  he  has  dined  (he  says) 
with  this  Colo^  at  Philadelphia  at  the  french  Ambassadors  and 
in  Consequence  from  having  him  put  in  Irons,  pay's  Great  Court 
to  him,  the  two  Colo^^  has  not  at  Yet  Met.  My  Men  have  been 
three  days  without  Provisions,  and  can  not  procure  Any  for 
them  they  have  killed  hogs  in  the  Commons  this  Greats  Bad 
Blood  &c.  and  Some  of  My  Men  as  well  as  Cap^  Kellars 
have  deserted  I  am  informed,  the  27^^  in  the  Evening  had 
a  dispute  with  G^  Dodge  on  acco*  of  his  not  getting  Provi- 
sions &c.  tho'  he  has  orders  therefor  from  Colo^  Montgomery  to 
purchase;  and  that  Some  of  our  poor  Soldiers  Died  purely  for 
want  of  Subsistance.  Next  day  he  complained  to  Colo^  Mont- 
gomery who  arrested  me,  thos  jarret  Williams  whorswhiped 
Dodge  &  Complained  yet  Colo^  Montgomery  Never  arrested 
Williams. 

got  a  Permision  in  writing  from  Col°  Montgomery  to  go  to 
Cahos  &  St  Louis  on  my  Private  Buissiness  the  30*^  Sett  off  for 
Cahos  arrived  Sunday  i^*  Octo^  2^  went  to  St  Louis  to  See  My 
Uncle  came  back  the  4^^;  when  I  found  Colo^  dela  Balme  Raising 
a  Party  for  Detroit  of  Voluntiers  with  those  from  Cascakia  Captn. 
Plassy  at  their  Head,  Our  Little  Doctor  Ray  with  them  the  5*^ 
Sett  of.  My  Serj^  Villiers  is  goeing  with  them  &  Many  Others 
of  my  Men  but  I  only  Saw  him,  I  informed  Serj*  Meryweathers 
of  the  Light  horse  that  he  was  a  Soldier  of  My  G^  and  had  State 
arms  and  that  he  was  a  Deserter,  myself  being  under  an  Arrest 
had  no  orders  to  give,  Serj*  merwether  took  Said  Villiers  &  Con- 
fined him,  Capt  Plassy  Gave  orders  and  the  Little  Doctor  at  the 
Head  of  a  Rabble  went  and  Rescued  him  from  the  Guard  and 


PENTECOSTE'S  CLAIM  621 

have  taken  him  along  with  them,  they  Amount  to  About  40  men, 
with  their  arms  &c.  each  man  fournishes  every  Necessary — 40 
days  Provisions  two  pounds  powder  &  Led.  I  Suppose  they 
have  30  horses  or  near  that  n°  with  them  they  are  to  be  joined  at 
Ouias  by  the  poste  People,  I  am  also  informed  by  one  of  the  In- 
habitants of  Cahos  that  the  people,  (that  is  a  Sett  of  them)  of 
Auposte,  Cascakia  &  Cahos  have  Sent  by  this  Colo^  dela  Balme 
to  Congress  or  the  french  Envoy,  a  Circumstantial  ace*  of  all 
their  Supposed  Grievances  and  Enormitties  Committed  in  this 
Country  by  our  Troops  much  Exagirated;  but  I  must  Confess 
Many  things  has  been  done  which  Should  not;  a  Sort  of  Com- 
bined Trade  Between  Dodge  Sz:  Bentley  for  the  purchasing  the 
Certificates  from  the  people  have  raised  their  hatred  of  us  to 
Such  a  Pitch  that  they  will  not  suffer  no  Troops  hear,  and  Desire 
we  all  March  of  Either  by  fair  means  or  otherwise  &c  this  Colo^ 
dela  Balme  the  Morning  he  left  Cahos  told  the  Indians  by  Tom 
Brady  wife  Interpreter  that  they  should  be  &  Remain  Quiet 
for  in  the  Spring  they  would  See  french  Troops  hear. — the  Span- 
ish Commander  hath  given  him  no  Countenance  whatever  and  h 
Surprised  he  is  Suffered  on  our  Side  he  being  Authorized  by  no 
State  or  Power  in  America  to  do  what  he  does  in  Short  as  things 
are  now  the  people  in  General  are  allinated  and  Changed  from 
us  there  must  be  a  Reason  for  it,  had  Colo^  Clark  been  hear  or 
an  officer  to  Second  him  this  would  not  have  been.      M^Carty 

Copy  of  Colo^  Montgomerys  Answer  to  My  Letter  viz 
Sir 

you  are  Permitted  to  Go  and  do  Your  Bisniss  &  be  a  Shured 
I  was  Much  a  Ganst  the  Arest  But  his  Complaint  Compeled  me 
to  it  and  I  am  Sir  as  Before  your  Humble  Serv* 

(Signed)  Jn°  Montgomery 

To  Magor  W  Cartey  (Draper  MSS.  50  J  68.) 

Pentecoste  to  Lacroix,  November  16,  1785.^ 

On  my  return  Home  from  your  part  of  the  Country  I  Pur- 
chased from  Generall  Clark  the  Grant  made  to  sir  Stephen  Trigg 
adjoining  the  lands  I  bought  of  Mr  Gerardine,  and  by  Sir  Stephen 

1  Papers  of  Old  Congress,  xlviii.,  55,  from  copy.  This  copy  was  enclosed  in  the  memorial 
printed  on  p,  581. 


622  ILLINOIS  Historical  collections 

Conveyed  to  the  Said  Genl.  Clark  Including  the  Caskaid  and  the 
feilds  [sic]  Adjoining  between  the  Abbee  Springs  and  Caskaid  and 
the  Mills,  this  grant  is  ten  Arpents  extending  out  from  the  line  of 
Common.  Easterly  one  half  Arpent  North  of  the  Caskaid  and 
thence  down  the  Missisipi  with  the  said  Line  of  Common  21 
arpents  in  Depth  and  as  those  Expressions  in  the  Original  Lan- 
guage means  Different  from  yours  of  the  Kanadian  Customs  I  am 
appprehensive  some  of  the  people  will  be  dissatisfied,  but  it  cannot 
be  helped,  for  for  [sic]  it  includes  upwards  of  Twelve  Thousand 
Acres  our  measure,  which  will  Extend  down  the  River  Near  Four 
Miles,  therefore  it  is  not  my  Intent  to  disturb  any  person  either 
setled  within  the  bounds  or  that  tend  feilds  [sic],  Captn,  Peterson 
will  give  them  Leases  for  ten  years  without  rent  subject  to  the  tak- 
ing Care  not  to  make  waste  and  to  keep  up  the  fences,  and  any 
person  that  may  have  built  in  the  bounds  shall  have  their  buildings 
and  a  Suitable  piece  of  Land  adjoining  thereto  without  paying  me 
any  thing  for  which  this  shall  Serve  as  an  Obligation,  and  I  Expect 
you  will  Assist  Captn  Peterson  in  Negociateing  this  business.  I 
enquired  at  Congress  Relating  to  grants  of  your  Country  made  by 
your  Preists  [sic]  or  Vicar  Generals  under  his  Lordship  the  Bishop 
of  Quebeck,  and  the  United  States  Agree  they  are  Valid  and  Can- 
not be  Controverted,  which  is  one  of  the  Titles  I  hold  by,  and  it 
may  be  pleaseing  to  your  Setlers  to  know  their  property  is  secure  to 
them  —  the  Post  Vintsent  People  seems  to  be  on  a  Diferent  footing, 
but  it  seems  the  Kaskaskias  and  your  people  have  a  Quite  different 
authority  to  grant  Lands. ^  I  saw  the  Generall  Clark  in  Philla- 
delphia  Last  sumer  who  told  me  as  soon  as  the  Late  Indian  Treaty 
was  Completed  that  he  would  Come  down  to  your  town  and  Lay 
out  my  lands  agreeable  to  Pattent  but  if  he  should  not  be  down 
this  summer  please  to  assist  Captn  Peterson  in  doing  it  as  he  has  a 
Coppy  of  the  deed  with  him  with  the  Engles  and  Calculations 
agreeable  to  which  it  must  be  done,  the  Original  deed  is  recorded 
in  the  Office  for  Recording  Deeds  in  the  Village  of  Kaskaskias  in 
book  or  Folio  No  172  Pages  122:  123  and  124  to  which  refference 
may  be  had.^ 

1  With  few  exceptions,  the  courts  of  Kaskaskia  and  Cahokia  confined  their  grants  of  land 
within  what  they  claimed  was  their  commons. 
This  volume  is  in  Chester,  111. 


PENTECOSTE'S  CLAIM  623 

Coppy  of  Part  of  A  Leter  Wrote  by  Collonell  Penticost  to  John 
Baetiest  [sic]  Lacroix  Dated  Washington  County  November  i6th 
1785  No.  I. 

July  i8th.  1786  Done  by  me  Nathl  Wells 

je  Souissigne  procureur  des  Etats  unis  de  lamerique  aux 
ilinois  residant  aux  Cahos  Certiffie  a  tous  quil  apartiendra  que 
lextrait  cy  dessus  a  Ete^  tir^  de  la  veritable  lettre  du  S^  pentecoste 
que  foy  doit  y  etre  ajoutee  comme  a  loriginal  qui  a  reste  en  mains 
du  S^  La  Croix  Magistra  du  d*  district  en  foy  de  quoy  j'ay  s\gn6 
le  present  et  a  iceluy  apose  mon  Cachet  ord^^  aux  Cahos  le  dix 
huit  juillet  mil  sept  cent  quatre  vingt  six. 

Labuxiere  pt  des  Etat 

[Translation  of  the  certificate].  I,  the  undersigned  state's 
attorney  at  Cahokia  of  the  Illinois  of  the  United  States  of  America, 
certify  to  all  whom  it  may  concern  that  the  above  extract  has  been 
copied  from  the  very  letter  of  M.  Pentecoste  and  that  faith  should 
be  given  thereto  as  to  the  original  which  remains  in  the  hands  of 
M.  LaCroix,  magistrate  of  the  said  district.  In  faith  of  which  I 
have  signed  the  present  and  set  thereon  my  seal,  at  Cahokia  the 
eighteenth  of  July,  1786. 

Labuxiere,  State  Attorney. 


624  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Census  of  Cahokia,  August  27,  1787.^ 
1787,  aoust  27.     Recensement  des  habitants  et  de  leiirs  enfans 
males  de  la  paroisse  des  Cahokias  aux  Ilinois.     Savoir 

[Translation:    1787,  August  27,  census  of  the  inhabitants  and 


their  male  children  of  the  parish  of  Cahokia  in  the  Illinois,  To  wit 


Mr.  franfois  Trottier  pere  ^  "^ 
ses  enfans 

francois  Trottier 

Clement 

Joseph 


Etienne  nicole  *  . . 

Deshaye^ 

Lagrave 

PhUipe  Le  Boeuf « 
Joseph  Lachanse  ^ 


auguste J  Gabriel  Langlois  ^ 

Raphael  Langlois 


Charle  Lefevre  pere  ^  ....  1  Alexis  Brisson»  ) 

Charle  Lefevre |  Alexis  son  fils    p 

auguste !- 5      Charles  Cadron  pere ^°    ...) 

'i:xt.v.::::::::::::::;J    iSe.v.vf-'^^ V 

1  Papers  of  the  Old  Congress,  Ixviii.,  189,  original  manuscript.  This  census  was  made  after 
Harmar's  visit  to  Illinois,  and  was  used  by  Barthelemi  Tardiveau  in  his  petitions  to  Congress 
for  grants  of  land.  There  are  similar  lists  of  the  inhabitants  of  Vincennes,  of  Kaskaskia,  and 
of  the  American  settlers.    The  last  gives  the  date  of  the  arrival  of  each  in  Illinois. 

For  the  following  notes  I  am  greatly  indebted  to  Mr.  Benjamin  Suite  of  Ottawa,  Canada, 
who  has  traced  for  me  the  famiHes  from  France  to  Canada,  and,  when  possible,  from  Canada 
to  Illinois.  The  cliief  sources  of  information  have  been  Tanguay,  Dictionnaire  Genealogique, 
7  vols.,  Mr.  Suite's  own  notes,  notes  of  Hon.  Walter  B.  Douglas  of  St.  Louis,  Mo.,  the  docu- 
ments printed  in  this  volume  and  a  collection  of  marriage  contracts  belonging  to  the  Cah. 
Rec.  in  Belleville,  III.  Identification  is  made  very  difficult  by  the  common  usage  among  the 
French  of  two  names,  the  regular  surname  and  a  second  name  given  for  some  peculiarity  of 
character  in  an  ancestor  or  taken  from  place  of  origin  or  habitation.  In  the  documents  of  the 
time  either,  or  both,  of  the  names  is  used. 

2  The  family  was  in  Canada  as  early  as  1647,  some  members  of  which  moved  to  Detroit  at 
an  early  date.  In  1758  Francois  Trottier  married  at  Cahokia  Louise  Laroche.  Reynolds 
{Pioneer  History,  35)  says  that  there  was  a  Joseph  Trottier  in  Cahokia  in  1775,  who  carried 
on  an  extensive  commerce  with  New  Orleans.  I  have  found  only  one  reference  to  him.—  Supra 
p  .459 .  Franf ois  was  very  prominent  after  the  coming  of  Clark,  was  made  the  commandant  of 
the  village  and  was  elected  ius^^ire  both 'of  Clark's  court  and  in  1779  of  that  of  the  district  of 
Cahokia.  » -  _  _ 

3  Lefebvre  or  Lefevre  called  Courier.  The  family  is  a  large  one  in  Canada,  but  I  have 
not  been  able  to  follow  this  particular  branch  to  Illinois.  There  was  a  Lefebrve  acting  as  judge 
in  the  Illinois  under  the  French  in  1765.  It  is  possible  that  Charles  is  descended  from  him. 
Charles  married  Franfoise  Nicolle  September  19,  1761.  It  is  probable  that  the  other  Couriers 
of  the  records  were  also  Lefevres. 

*  Correct  spelling  Nicolle.  Probably  a  son  of  the  Etienne  Nicolle  who  was  poisoned  by  the 
negroes.    See  supra,  p.  13  et  seq . 

6  Deshayes  called  St.  Cyr.    The  family  settled  near  Three  Rivers,  Canada,  in  1672. 

6  Three  families  of  this  name  settled  early  in  Lower  Canada. 

7  Caillot  called  Lachanse.  Probably  the  son  of  Nicolas  Lachanse  of  Kaskaskia,  who  had 
a  son  of  this  name. 

J  Langlois  is  a  common  second  name  in  Canada,  and  is  found  both  in  Cahokia  and  Kas- 
kaskia used  as  a  surname.  A  Clement  Langlois  was  a  justice  in  1780,  but  what  his  relation  to 
these  two  was  I  do  not  know. 

8  Born  at  St.  Pierre-les-Becquets  near  Three  Rivers,  Canada,  March  6,  1746,  he  married 
at  Cahokia  Julienne  Locat,  widow  of  Pierre  Roy,  on  September  25,  1787.  As  the  preceding 
pages  show,  he  was  of  a  lawless  character  and  gave  the  authorities  much  trouble. 

10  From  Lower  Canada. 


CENSUS,  AUGUST,  1787  625 

Joseph  Bellecour  "    i      Joseph  Labuxiere  pere  ^^  . .  ^ 


Joseph  Cecire  pere^^ 
Joseph  son  fils 


Louis 

Antoine J-  ses  fils 


2      francois )  J 


jean  Lapensde  ^'    i 

Joseph  Lapensde "    i  jean  Bte.  Lalande i 

francois  Lapens^e  ^^ i 

antoine  Lepage ^  

Joseph  Lepage  '*   !  andre  Becquet ) 

Simon  Lepage f  ^  Charle  Becquet f 

Louis  Lepage J  PhUipe  Gervais  "    "1 

Louis  "1  i 

,  .      ^  Philipe  >  ses  fils  {  ^ 

antoine  Boyer i  j^^J^  [  J 


Tgnace 


augustin  dubuque  ^^  i      Pierre  Lajeunesse  ^^   i 

1^  His  signature  reads  Belcour.  This  was  a  very  conunon  second  name  among  the 
French.    I  have  noted  it  as  given  among  the  Cahokians  to  a  Saucier  and  a  Lebrun. 

12  Cesire  in  Canada  and  Casirre  according  to  the  signature  of  his  father.  The  family  was 
at  Lachine,  Canada,  in  1670.  Antoine,  the  father  of  this  Joseph,  was  in  Cahokia  as  early  as 
September,  1753.  at  which  time  he  married.  He  was  the  most  important  citizen  of  Cahokia 
in  1778.  He  died  in  1779.  His  son,  Joseph,  married  on  February  9,  1777,  Marie  Alarie.  He 
was  one  of  the  justices  in  1781.  On  August  6,  1783,  he  married  Marie  Louise  Levy,  widow  of 
Michel  Monet. 

13  The  name  as  given  here  was  probably  the  correct  spelling,  but  since  this  member  of  the 
family  was  the  only  one  who  could  write  and  he  preferred  to  spell  the  name  Lapanc^,  I  have 
followed  that  spelling  throughout  the  volume.  The  name  was  the  second  name  of  the  Roy 
family.  Jean  Roy,  his  father,  emigrated  from  Lachine,  Canada,  to  Cahokia  before  1752,  for 
he  was  married  there  in  that  year  to  Marie  Pancrasse.  Joseph  Roy  called  Lapanc6  was  evi- 
dently an  important  citizen,  since  he  was  twice  elected  to  the  ofl&ce  of  justice,  in  1783  and  1786. 
He  married  on  February  8,  1781,  Catherine  Cesirre,  daughter  of  Antoine  Casirre. 

"  The  Lepages  of  Cahokia  probably  came  from  Canada,  where  several  families  of  that 
name  settled  between  1665  and  1750.  A  Joseph  Lepage  was  elected  justice  in  1780,  but 
whether  he  was  this  one  or  the  father  of  these  four  I  do  not  know. 

15  The  Dubuques  came  from  St.  Pierre-les-Becquets  in  the  district  of  Three  Rivers,  Cana- 
da. The  most  important  of  the  family  was  Julien  Dubuque,  after  whom  Dubuque,  Iowa,  was 
named.  It  has  been  said  that  he  was  at  Cahokia  for  a  time,  but  I  have  found  no  evidence  of  his 
presence  there. — Tass6,  Les  Canadiens  de  I'ouest,  239  et  seq.  What  is  known  about  Augustin 
Dubuque  will  be  found  in  this  volume.    See  Index. 

1^  Not  Labussiere  or  Labusciere,  as  it  is  sometimes  written.  Billon,  Annals  of  St.  Lottis, 
27,  says  he  came  from  Canada,  but  no  trace  of  him  has  been  found  there.  He  became  notary- 
clerk  in  the  Illinois  in  1757  and  served  the  French  government  till  1765,  when  he  went  to  St. 
Louis,  where  he  received  the  first  grant  of  land  in  the  new  settlement.  Here  he  continued  to 
exercise  his  functions  under  the  government  of  the  interregnum.  After  the  Spaniards  took 
possession  he  served  as  notary  till  about  the  year  1781,  when  he  went  to  Kaskaskia  and  was 
appointed  state's  attorney  and  notary.  See  supra  p.  487.  On  account  of  the  disorders  of  the 
village,  he  moved  to  Cahokia,  and,  as  the  preceding  pages  show,  gave  the  community  able  ser- 
vice.    He  died  April  29,  1791- — Missouri  Reports,  iv,  343. 

17  See  supra,  note  13.  This  is  probably  J.  Pierre  Roy  called  Lapanc^.  He  was  elected  a 
justice  in  1784.  In  1785  he  married  Marguerite  Lefebvre,  daughter  of  J.  Marie  Lefebvre  and 
widow  of  J.  B.  Lalande. 

18  Francois  Xavier  Roy  called  Lapanc^  married  Theresa,  daughter  of  Pierre  Godin, 
January  28,  1786. 

1*  The  family  was  from  Canada. 

20  This  second  name  belongs  to  36  different  families  in  Canada. 


626  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


jean  Bte.  Cadien  " i 

Joseph  Buteau  ^^    i 

antoine  Lamarche  ^'  

antoine  son  fils 

pierre  courville  ^°    i 

jean  dorion "    i 

jean  Bte  dumay  ^^    i 

Michel  Charly  ^^    \  ^      pierre  sicart  ^^    i 

Michel  son  fils f         charle  Butard i 

jean  Bte.  charlev  aussi  son  Pierre  Lecompte  ^*    i 

fils  ^  I  


nicolas  turgeon" 
Bte.  Mercier22  . 
julien  Mercier . . . 
hubert  Mercier. . 
pierre  troge  "  . . . 
Louis  pilet  ^^    — 

Charle  pilet 

michel  pilet 


Bte.  Saucier  pere 


36 


francois  Dion  ^^   i      jean  Bte  son  fils >  3 

martel i      mathieu  son  fils ) 

'^  The  family  emigrated  to  Canada  in  1645  and  has  spread  to  all  regions. 

22  The  family  came  to  Montreal  in  1658. 

23  This  as  it  is  written  is  not  a  Canadian  name,  but  it  may  be  Troche  called  Lafleur,  a 
name  found  in  Montreal  in  1 748.  The  name  of  Lafleur  was  common  in  Cahokia,  as  in  Canada. 
Pierre  had  moved  across  th'>  river  to  St.  Charles  by  1791- — Census  of  St.  Louis  in  Mo.  His.  Soc. 
library  of  St.  Louis. 

24  Family  at  Boucherville,  Canada,  in  1680.  Some  of  the  family  were  early  settlers  in 
Detroit,  and  it  is  probable  that  these  Fillets  came  from  there.  Louis  Fillet  was  a  justice  in 
1784. 

26  Charly  called  St.  Ange.  Family  from  Montreal,  where  the  first  Charly  in  this  country 
settled  in  1653. 

26  Transformed  from  Guyon.     From  Canada. 

27  Ferhaps  Cadieu,  as  it  is  written  in  Canada,  but  the  Cahokia  clerk  spells  it  very  carefully 
Cadien.  In  Amer.  State  Papers,  Public  Lands,  ii.,  164,  Cadien  is  given  as  a  second  name  to 
Pierre  Roy.  It  is  possible  that  one  branch  of  the  Roy  family  was  called  Lapancd  and  another 
Cadien.    See  supra,  note  13. 

28  From  Canada. 

20  Second  name  of  nineteen  families  in  Canada.  He  was  the  son  of  Antoine  Lamarche 
of  the  Montreal  district,  and  married  April  17,  1781,  Magdeleine  Buyat.  He  was  a  justice  in 
1783.     On  October  19,  1785,  he  married  Marie,  daughter  of  J.  B.  Becquet. 

30 1  find  this  as  a  second  name  of  the  Cadien  family,  but  see  supra  note  27.  He  was  born 
about  1762. 

31  Family  in  Lower  Canada  since  1684.  J.  Marie  Dorion  was  son  of  J.  Marie  Dorion  of 
Quebec,  and  married  Marie  Magdeleine  Buteau,  widow  of  Alexis  Bissiette  of  Cahokia,  Novem- 
ber 19,  1773. 

32  Also  Dumest,  Dumets,  Dumais,  Dumers.  Family  in  Canada  as  early  as  1640,  J . 
Bte.  Dumay's  father,  Jacques  Dumay,  was  killed  by  an  Indian  at  Detroit  in  1760,  the  year  the 
son  was  born. 

33  Better  Sicard.     Family  from  Canada. 

3*  Second  name  belonging  to  many  families. 

36  Saussier  in  France.  The  family  is  descended  from  a  line  of  merchants  who  lived  in 
Orleans,  France.  J.  Bte.  Saucier,  the  founder  of  the  Illinois  branch,  became  amilitary  engineer 
and  was  sent  to  the  Illinois.  Here  he  planned  Fort  de  Chartres  in  1752.  When  the  country 
was  surrendered  to  the  British  he  retired  to  Cahokia.  Snyder,  Captain  Jean  Baptiste 
Saucier  The  story  of  the  lives  of  his  sons,  J.  Bte.,  Franfois,  and  Matthieu,  is  foundin 
these  records.  They  were  important  men  in  the  community  and  were  frequently  elected  to 
office.  Franfois  was  the  first  clerk  of  the  Court  of  the  District  of  Cahokia  and  Baptiste  was 
one  of  the  first  judges.  Like  many  other  Frenchmen,  Frangois  and  Matthieu  withdrew  to  the 
Spanish  banks  on  account  of  the  immigration  of  the  Americans.    The  former  was  appointed 


CENSUS,  AUGUST,  1787  627 

pierre  martin  ^'    j         Paul  Poupar ) 

pierre  martin >■  3      Paul  son  fils f 

hyacinthe ) 


Joseph  Bissonet  *^    i 

francois  Noize ''    i      Joseph  Giroux  '^    i 


Louis  Roy 


Mathieu  Saucier  ^^    )         francois  Roy. 

mathieu  son  fils \  


I 


1 


jean  Bte.  melot^^ 


Louis  Lebrun  ^*   

Louis    /  .  1 3      francois  saucier  pere "    ) 

Batiste  f^^^^^^ J         charlesonfils.    [ 

Thomas  Bredy  *<>  \  •   g^^   QonneviUe  ^^    i 

Baptiste  son  fils f  jean  chauvin  ^«    i 

jean  Beaulieu  "^    i 

Louis  Lamarche i  Michel  Beaulieu i 

commandant  at  Portage  des  Sieux  and  was  given  a  large  tract  of  land  by  the  Spanish  govern- 
ment in  1799.  His  brother,  Matthieu,  received  a  grant  the  next  year. — 24  Cong.,  isi  Sess.,  H 
of  Rep.,  Doc.  59,  pp.  75  and  181.     Francois  vras  living  in  1817  and  was  about  eighty  years  old. 

36  Old  and  large  Canadian  family.    Pierre  was  a  justice  in  1779. 

^  Noiset  called  Labb6.  His  father  was  Nicolas,  who  married  at  Cahokia  January  16, 
1758,  Marie  St.  Yves.  The  river  Labb^,  in  Cahokia,  was  evidently  named  after  the  family, 
which  had  a  mill  on  the  stream. 

^  See  supra,  note  35. 

38  Fifteen  families  of  this  name  in  Canada.  His  father's  name  was  Joseph  Lebrun.  He 
himself  married  Marie  Louise,  daughter  of  Francois  Trottier,  February  13,  1776.  He  was  a 
justice  in  1782-1784. 

*o  From  his  marriage  contract  with  Marie  LachevSque,  widow  of  Charles  Le  Boeuf  called 
Lafiamme,  of  June  8,  1779,  it  is  learned  he  was  a  "native  of  New  England  of  the  ville  of  Mary- 
land," which  doesn't  agree  with  Reynolds'  statement  {Pioneer  History,  68)  that  he  was  a  native 
of  Pennsylvania.  He  was  a  member  of  the  De  la  Balme  expedition  against  St.  Joseph,  and  was 
captured.  He  afterwards  escaped  and  returned  to  the  IlUnois.  See  Introduction,  p.  xcii.  and 
Mason,  Chapters  from  Illinois  History,  285.  His  connection  with  this  expedition  proves  that 
his  interests  were  with  the  French  party  in  the  Illinois  rather  than  with  the  American.  He 
was  for  a  time  Indian  agent  at  Cahokia.— Cfl/t.  Rec.  In  1785  he  was  one  of  the  justices  and 
for  several  years  acted  as  huissier. 

*^  He  was  the  son  of  Jean  Bissonnette,  a  native  of  Canada,  and  married  the  widow  of 
Michel  Girardin,  June  12,  1776.    In  1784  he  was  one  of  the  justices. 

*2  From  a  large  and  old  Canadian  family. 

*3  Probably  Milot.    A  family  from  Montreal. 

**  See  supra,  note  35. 

*5  Second  name  of  the  Desjardins.    There  was  a  Charles  Desjardins  at  Detroit  in  176 1. 

**  The  Illinois  Chauvins  were  probably  members  of  a  Detroit  family  of  that  name.  There 
was  an  important  branch  of  the  family  at  Kaskaskia.  I  have  found  nothing  of  this  Jean 
Chauvin. 

*7  The  full  name  is  Palmier  called  Beaulieu.  The  father  of  these,  Michel  Beaulieu,  was 
one  of  the  justices  of  Clark's  court  and  was  elected  justice  of  the  Court  of  the  District  in  17791 


628  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Bazile  Beaiilieu i      Claude  Chesnier  pere  ^*         \ 

Louis  Beaulieu i      Joseph  (.  ses  fils 

jean  Batiste  j 

Nicolas  Boismenu*^    i  


r3 


Louis  deslonchamp 


henry  Biron^^    J         Louis  son  fils ....  T [  ^ 

Charle  son  fils .  j  


^.         ^,        .  Charle  ducharme  ^^    i 

Pierre  Chrestien  ^° i  

Pierre  Laperche "   i  r      •  j  ^i 

.    ^  ,  Louis  gaud  " 

Louis  Rele"    )  L^^is  1 

Clement  Rele \  Joseph  ^  ses  fils 

jean  Bte       J 

auguste  lecompte i  

francois  theophile i  francois  gramont ''    

Joseph  Poupar  pere  ^^    . . . .  ^  

r'f----'  ses  fils  [3  Pierre  Lafleur  pere"    .... 

Paul )  ;  pierre  son  fils 


but  he  died  shortly  afterwards.  His  wife,  and  the  mother  of  these  Beaulieu,  was  a  member 
of  the  Chauvin  family,  her  father  being  a  subaltern  officer  at  St.  Philippe.  She  was  educated  at 
Quebec  and  was  "Director  General  in  moral  and  medical  matters"  of  Cahokia. — Reynolds' 
Pioneer  History,  295.     She  lived  to  an  advanced  age  and  died  in  1826. 

*8  This  is  the  second  name  of  many  families  in  Canada.  Nicolas  was  the  son  of  Andre 
Boismenu  of  Montreal.  He  married  Margaret  Palmier  called  Beaulieu,  daughter  of  Michel 
Beaulieu,  on  January  28,  1786.  He  was  a  member  of  the  De  la  Balme  expedition  against  St. 
Joseph. 

49  The  family  was  from  Canada.  Henry  Biron  was  one  of  the  justices  in  1788  and  served 
till  1790. 

50  Two  families  in  Lower  Canada  of  this  name. 

61  Laperche  called  St.  Jean.  The  family  was  in  Boucherville,  Canada,  as  early  as  1694. 
He  was  the  son  of  Pierre  Laperche,  and  married  Therese  Chretien,  February  25,  1786.  He 
was  one  of  the  justices  in  1787,  and  served  till  1790. 

62  Also  Relle,  Real,  and  Riel.    The  name  is  still  found  in  the  province  of  Quebec. 

63  The  family  was  in  Boucherville,  Canada,  in  1680. 
6*  Also  Chenier.     The  family  was  in  Quebec  in  1649. 

65  Deslongchamps,  the  second  name  of  the  Hubout  family,  which  settled  in  Lower  Canada 
as  early  as  1645. 

66  The  name  is  found  in  Montreal  at  an  early  date .  The  family  has  been  famous  in  western 
annals  through  the  deeds  of  Dominique,  Joseph,  Laurent,  and  Paul.  Charles  Du  Charme  is 
a  hitherto  unknown  member  of  the  family.  He  was  one  of  the  most  prominent  inhabitants  of 
the  village,  and  served  twice  as  justice. 

67  This  name  is  probably  not  Canadian.  He  married  Charlotte  Lonval  September  6, 
1775- 

68  Grandmont  is  the  proper  spelling.  Second  name  of  the  Hour6s,  who  lived  near  Three 
Rivers,  Canada,  as  early  as  1670.  He  was  the  son  of  Pierre  Grandmont,  and  married  Catherine, 
daughter  of  Joseph  Clermont,  February  16,  1784. 

68  If  the  identification  in  note  23  above  is  correct,  the  name  is  Troche  called  Lafleur.  The 
name  Lafleur,  however,  was  and  is  as  common  in  Canada  as  Smith  with  us.  Pierre  was  son 
of  Paul  Lafleur,  and  married  Marie  Amable,  daughter  of  Fr.  Lonval,  February  8,  1784. 


CENSUS,  AUGUST,  1787 


629 


Bte.  Baron «« i 

Louis  Clemont "   i 

pierre  Clemont i 


jean  Bte  dubuque  " 
hyacinthe  Cecire 


pierre  Butau i 

alexis  tabeau  "^    i 

jean  Bte  Kaire i 


Louis  compte  '*  i 

Louis  . .  ) 

jean  Bte  >  ses  "fils 3 

Bazile..  \ 


Louis  harmand  '^  .. 
francois  harmand. . . 
jean  Bte.  harmand. . 


freres 


Louis  Leboeuf "" 
Bazile  Leboeuf. . 


freres  2 


antoine  Lacource  "* 
antoine  son  fils 


Louis  trotier  pere '° 

^■^^"^'^        i  ses  fils 
Joseph  j 


Pierre  durbois  "    i 


andre  merleau  " 
francois  merleau 


francois  courier ««    . .  )  ^^^^^^  ^ 
pacsal  courier  f 


jean  Bte  merleau 
fraucois  merleau . 


francois  Lonval 

francois  )         ^, 

paul  [  ses  fil'^ 


2  [3] 


george  Blain  "  i 

Gabriel  merleau i 


60  Uncertain  whether  from  Canada  or  not.  His  wife  was  Domitilde  Rolet.  He  was  one 
of  the  justices  in  1782.    He  died  some  time  before  lySg, 

81  Correct  spelling,  Clermont.  The  name  is  common  both  as  surname  and  second 
name  in  Canada.    Louis  was  killed  on  the  Cumberland  River  in  1793. 

62  Family  from  Lachine,  Canada.    Alexis  died  before  1789. 

63  Full  name  Harmand  called  Sansfapon.  The  family  is  from  Canada.  These  are 
probably  the  sons  of  Antoine,  who  plays  such  an  important  part  in  the  court  record. 

64  Second  name  of  three  Canadian  families. 

66  Durbois,  or  Dubois.  The  family  is  from  Canada.  He  was  the  son  of  J.  Bte.  Dur- 
bois, and  married  Catherine,  daughter  of  Fr.  Lefebvre  called  Coiurier. 

66  Probably  Lefebvre  called  Courier.  See  supra,  note  3,  but  there  were  two  families 
of  Couriers  in  Canada  from  the  end  of  the  17th  century.  Franfois  was  twice  elected  justice, 
in  1780  and  1783.  ,  .,    ,  ;,    ,    ,  ,, 

67  See  supra,  note  15.  Jean  Bte.  was  the  son  of  Andre  pubuque,_  a  native  of  Montreal, 
and  married  Suzanne,  daughter  of  Antoine  Cesirre.  His  influence  in  Cahokia  was  equal 
to  that  of  Francois  Trottier  or  of  Antoine  Girardin.  He  was  a  justice  in  178 1,  again  in  1785 
and  in  1788,  when  he  served  till  1790.    He  was  acting  as  commandant  in  1787. 

68  See  supra,  note  34.  Native  of  Terre  Bonne  of  the  province  of  Montreal.  He  married 
Marie  Lamarche,  widow  of  Joseph  Langdoc,  January  27,  1775. 

68  There  were  three  families  of  this  name  settled  in  Lower  Canada  between  1 66  s  and  1 7  59 . 

™  See  supra,  note  2.    Probably  a  nephew  or  cousin  of  Francois  Trottier. 

71  Called  both  Petit  and  Laramie.  The  family  came  from  Lachine,  and  was  in  Cahokia 
as  early  as  1761. 

72AlsoBlin.  From  parish  of  St.  Pierre-du-Mont-de-St.  Michel,  Normandy.  He  married 
Suzanne  Alarie,  widow  of  Louis  Bissonnette,  October  25,  1775.  His  father  was  a  justice  in 
1 781  and  died  about  1784. 


630  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

francois  oubreman i  ignace  grondine  ''^    .  ) 

francois  grondine . . .  V  freres   3 

jean  Bte  milot "    )  Joseph  grondine —  ) 

Jacques  son  fils j 


Charles  la  Croix i 


Joseph  Poirier  ^*    i 


Joseph  Laplante  ^^    i 

Louis  chatel  pere  ^^    j  

Louis  son  fils f        Paul  de  St.  pierre  ^^    i 

hameau  de  la  prairie  du  pont  paroisse  des  cahos. 

[Translation:  Hamlet  of  Prairie  du  Pont,  Parish  of  Cahokia. 

Laurant  amelin  pere  ^^ j         gabriel  telier  ^^   ) 

Louis  )  y  3      amant  telier i 

•u           >•  ses  nls              \ 
Joseph  j  ;         Joseph  Lambert ''    i 

francois  hamelin i      Charles  germain ''    ) 

Etienne  ardouin  ^^  i      Charles  son  fils ) 


73  He  was  bom  at  Pointe  Claire,  near  Montreal,  and  married  Franfoise  Pillet  at  St.  Louis, 
January  15,  1781. 

7*  Poirier  called  Desloges.    The  family  settled  at  Lachine,  Canada,  in  1705- 

75  The  family  settled  near  Quebec  in  1680,  and  has  spread  in  all  directions.  Although 
illiterate,  Louis  Chatel  was  an  influential  man  in  the  community,  and  was  a  justice  in  1784, 
1786,  and  in  1788,  serving  the  last  time  till  1790. 

76  The  name  of  a  fief  forty  miles  below  Three  Rivers,  Canada.  The  Hamelins  were 
seigniors  of  it,  and  since  Hamelins  dwelt  in  Cahokia  these  men  probably  were  of  the  same  stock . 
There  were  Hamelins  at  Michillimackinac  as  early  as  1738.  It  was  a  J.  Bte.  Hamelin  who 
led  the  detachment  of  the  De  la  Balme  force  against  St.  Joseph  in  1780,  where  he  was  killed. 
He  was  probably  the  father  of  these  brothers. 

77  Second  name  of  fourteen  different  families  in  Canada. 

78  Father  Paul  de  St.  Pierre  was  a  native  of  Germany  or  Holland.  He  became  a  Car- 
melite, served  as  priest  in  France,  and  came  to  America  as  chaplain  in  Rochambeau's  army. 
He  was  sent  by  Prefect- Apostolic  Carroll  as  missionary  to  the  West.  In  February,  1785, 
he  was  in  Louisville,  Kentucky,  and  then  went  to  Cahokia,  where  he  resided  as  parish  priest 
till  1789.  He  was  very  popular  with  the  people,  and  they  built  for  him  a  new  parochial  resi- 
dence and  a  new  church.  The  latter  is  still  standing.  His  relations  with  Father  Gibault, 
who  was  priest  at  Vincennes  till  1789,  were  very  pleasant;  but  the  ecclesiastical  peace  of  the 
Illinois  was  disturbed  by  the  appearance  of  Father  de  la  Valiniere  as  vicar  general  of  the 
prefect-apostolic.  The  latter  made  many  complaints  against  Father  de  St.  Pierre,  but  the 
people  of  Cahokia  upheld  their  priest.  Like  the  other  priests  of  the  Illinois,  Father  de  St. 
Pierre  was  persuaded  by  the  Spaniards  to  cross  the  river,  and  he  was  put  in  charge  of  the  parish 
of  Ste.  Genevieve,  where  he  officiated  till  1797.  Where  he  went  then  I  do  not  know,  but  from 
1804  till  his  death  on  October  15,  1826,  he  was  parish  priest  at  Pointe  Coup6e,  where  he  was 
regarded  as  "one  of  the  most  remarkable  priests  that  ever  administered  St.  G-abriel's  church." 
—  Shay,  Life  and  Times  of  Archbishop  Carroll,  Index  (add  reference,  p.  474);  Amer.  Calh. 
Hist.  Researches,  New  Ser.,  ii..  No.  3;  Rozier,  Early  Settlement  of  the  Miss.  Valley,  117; 
Introduction,  p.  cxxxi. 

79  See  siipra  note  76. 

^  Probably  he  came  from  France  to  Detroit,  where  he  married  Marie  Josephte  Lapointe, 
January  6,  1771.    He  may,  however,  be  descended  from  the  Hardouin  family  of  Canada. 

81  Also  Letellier.  The  family  settled  in  Canada  about  1655.  There  were  members  of 
the  family  in  Michillimackinac  in  1747. 

82  Three  different  families  in  Canada  of  this  name. 

83  Six  families  of  this  name  in  Canada  in  the  17th  century.  He  was  son  of  Charles  Ger- 
main, and  married  Catherine,  daughter  of  Ignace  Grondine,  October  12,  1783. 


CENSUS,  AUGUST,  1787 


631 


pierre  cabassier" 
Joseph  cabassier 
Baptiste  cabassier 
Xavier  cabassier 
Charles  cabassier 
antoine  cabassier 


j-  freres  6 


jeanGodin»»    

francois  Godin }  f rare  3 

pierre  Godin 


Joseph  Lacouture  " 


francois  Bracanda  ^^ 

andre  Bracanda 

Joseph  vaudry  ^^    . . . 
Bte  vaudry 


amable  Chartran  "   i 


Baptiste  chartren 
Toussaint  chartren 
Thomas  chartran 
Michel  chartran 


Baptiste  la  Becasse  »^   ") 

Baptiste  son  fils >•  3 

alexis  labecasse ) 


Joseph  desloges"* 
Joseph  son  fils . . . 


Joseph  Biguier®^ 
Louis  son  fils 


Izidore  Savoy  "^   i 


Michel  Rocq 
Michel  gau. 


I 

I 

Louis  gau  *^   I 


Philipe  Engel »«     

antoine  angel [-3 

michel  angel 


francois  alexandre.  ^^ 


Baptiste  alary  pere  ^* 

?^P".^t«       isesfils 
Joseph  j 


Louis  perian. . . 
Baptiste  perian 


8*  The  family  was  in  Lachine,  Canada,  about  1668.  There  was  a  family  of  this  name 
in  Detroit  in  1752. 

86  Joseph  Chatigny  called  Lacouture.    The  family  is  from  Canada. 
^  Family  in  Montreal  before  1668. 

87  Siguier  called  Grosl6.  He  came  to  Cahokia  from  Prairie  du  Rocher.  The  family 
came  to  Canada  in  1755. 

8*  Gaud.    See  supra,  note  57. 

89  Also  Alarie,  which  is  the  way  the  members  of  the  Illinois  family  wrote  it.  The  family 
was  in  Canada  in  1678.  He  was  the  son  of  Bte.  Alarie,  and  married  Catherine  Laviolette, 
widow  of  Pierre  Godin,  April  16,  1781.    He  was  a  judge  in  1782. 

90  Godin  called  Turanjeau;  also  spelled  Gaudin.  The  family  was  in  Canada  in  165 1. 
The  father  of  these  three,  Pierre  Godin,  was  one  of  the  prominent  inhabitants  of  Cahokia  in 
1778.  He  served  as  justice  in  Clark's  court,  but  he  died  shortly  after  being  elected  as  one  of 
the  justices  of  the  Court  of  the  District  of  Cahokia  in  1779. 

91  Possibly  Spanish  settlers. 

92  The  family  was  at  Three  Rivers,  Canada,  in  1658. 

93  Labecasse.    Possibly  not  from  Canada.  , 
9*  See  supra,  note  74. 

95  Also  Savoy  and  Savoie.  Many  families  of  this  name  settled  in  Canada  between  1747 
and  1779-  In  1791  Isidore  Savoy  was  in  Spanish  St.  Charles. —  Census  0}  lypi,  in  Missouri 
Hist.  Soc.  Library  of  St.  Louis. 

96  Native  of  the  Duchy  of  Darmstadt,  Germany.  He  married  Marie  Josephte  Rochelot 
on  August  13,  1783.  He  was  elected  a  justice  in  1785,  17871  and  1788,  when  he  served  till, 
1790. 

97  This  may  be  either  a  surname  or  a  second  name,  both  of  which  are  found  in  Canada 


632  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

francois  gerome*^   i      jean  Bte.  La  Croix  pere  ^^^ 

Louis  giroux i      Baptiste  la  Croix      ) 

pierre  Gassien i      francois  la  Croix      >-  ses  fils 


Louis  La  Croix 


r4 


Michel  Peltier »» 


antoine  girardin""     )  Gabriel  Baron  ^^^ 

Louis  girardin f  Michel  Clermont. , 

Michel  girardin j  pierre  Clermont. . . 

antoine  girardin  fils f  auguste  Clermont , 


auguste  girardin i      Francois  Renoux 

je  soussigne  commandant  aux  cahokias  aux  Ilinois  Certiffie  le 
present  rescensement  viritable  montans  a  deux  trente  neuf  per- 
sonnes  males  residant  Et  habitants  dans  les  deux  villages  tous 
franjais  tant  hommes  que  enfant  males  aux  Cahos  le  neuf  sep- 
tempre  1787. 

[Translation:  1,  the  undersigned  Commandant  at  Cahokia  in 
the  Illinois,  certify  the  present  census  to  be  correct,  amounting 
to  two  hundred  and  thirty-nine  [40  ?]  male  persons  residents  and 
inhabitants  in  the  two  villages,  all  French,  both  men  and  male 
children.     At  Cahokia  the  ninth  of  September,  1787.] 

^  Also  Gerosme.  Probably  a  second  name.  He  was  the  son  of  Jean  Gerosme,  and 
married  Marie  Louise  Lemire,  widow  of  Louis  Giroux  and  also  of  Frangois  Biguier  called 
Grosl6. 

^  Pelletier  called  Antaya.  The  family  was  among  the  early  arrivals  in  Canada.  About 
1665  one  of  the  family  married  an  Indian  woman,  from  whom  came  the  name  Antaya.  The 
family  was  in  Cahokia  as  early  as  1751. 

100  A  family  of  this  name  settled  near  Quebec  as  early  as  1664,  but  this  Cahokia  family 
may  have  come  directly  from  France.  Antoine  was  one  of  the  most  prominent  citizens  of  the 
community.  He  bought  in  1764  the  plantation  and  mill  belonging  to  the  mission  of  St. 
Sulpice  at  Prairie  du  Pont. — Reynolds,  Pioneer  History,  54.  He  was  justice  in  Clark's 
court,  and  was  elected  a  justice  of  the  Court  of  the  District  of  Cahokia  in  1779,  1785,  and  1787, 
serving  till  1790.  During  the  last  years  he  was  president  of  the  Court.  He  was  commandant 
of  the  village  of  Prairie  du  Pont.  After  the  estabhshment  of  the  county  of  St.  Clair  he  was 
appointed  judge  of  the  Court  of  Common  Pleas  as  well  as  of  Quarter  Sessions,  and  he  held 
other  important  positions.    He  died  about  1802. — Smith,  St.  Clair  Papers,  ii,  165. 

^^^  The  name  is  a  most  common  one  in  Canada.  His  full  name  was  J.  Bte.  Hubert 
LaCroix.  He  was  son  of  Pierre  Hubert  LaCroix  of  Quebec,  and  married  Catherine  Au- 
buchon,  widow  of  Joseph  Clermont.  He  is  probably  the  LaCroix  referred  to  in  Clark's  letter  to 
Mason. —  English,  Conquest  of  the  Northwest,  i,  443.  He  was  one  of  the  justices  in  1780, 
1784,  1785,  and  1786. 

102  See  supra,  note  60.  He  was  a  son  of  J.  Bte.  Baron,  and  was  bom  at  Cahokia  December 
17,  1752.  He  married,  first,  Marie  Louise  Buteau,  and,  on  June  15,  1789  Marie  Harmand, 
widow  of  Alexis  Tabeau.     He  was  a  justice  in  1772. 

103  From  an  old  Canadian  family. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Account  of  the  Proceedings  of  the  Illinois  and  Ouahache  Land  Companies. 
Philadelphia,  1796. 

Alden,  G.  H.,  New  Governments  West  0}  the  Alleghanies  before  1780.     Bulle- 
tin of  the  University  of  Wisconsin.     Madison,  1897. 

Alerding,  H.,  A  History  o]  the  Catholic  Church  in  the  Diocese  oj  Vincennes. 
Indianapolis,  1883. 

Alvord,  C,  W.,  "Eighteenth  Century  French  Records  in  the  Archives  of 
Illinois",  in  Annual  Report  of  the  American  Historical  Association 
for  1905.  Washington,  1906. 
Kaskaskia  Records:  An  Address  before  the  Chicago  Historical  So- 
ciety. Chicago,  1906. 
Illinois  in  the  Eighteenth  Century.  Bulletin  of  the  Illinois  State  His- 
torical Library.     Vol.  i.,  No.  i.     Springfield,  1905. 

American  Catholic  Historical  Researches,  New  Series,  ii..  No.  3.     Phila. 

American  State  Papers,  Public  Lands.     Vols,  i.-iii.,  Washington,  1832. 

Archives  Coloniales  k  Paris,  Series  B. 

Babeau,  A.,  La  Vie  Rurale  dans  L'Ancienne  France.     Paris,  1885. 
Le  Village  sous  UAncien  Regime.     2d  ed.,  Paris,  1879. 

Babeau,  H.,  Les  Assemblies  Generales  des  Communautes  d' Habitants  en 
France.     Paris,  1893. 

Bancroft  Collection  of  MSS.,  Lenox  Library,  New  York. 

Bancroft,  George,  History  of  the  United  States.    10  vols.    Boston,  1834-1874. 

Beck,  L.  C,  A  Gazetteer  of  the  States  of  Illinois  and  Missouri.     Albany, 
1823. 

Benton,  E.  J.,  The  Wabash  Trade.     J.  H.  U.  Studies,  xxi.     Baltimore,  1903. 

Billon,  F.  L.,  Annals  of  St.  Louis.     2  vols.     St.  Louis,  1886,  1888. 

Blanchard,  Rufus,  Discovery  and  Conquest  of  the  Northwest.     Wheaton  1879. 

Boggess,  A.  C,  American  Immigration  into  Illinois,   iyy8-i8jo.     Thesis 
in  manuscript. 

Boyd,  C.  E.,  "The  County  of  Illinois,"  in  the  American  Historical  Review, 
iv..  No.  4.     New  York. 

Breese,  Sidney,  The  Early  History  of  Illinois.     Chicago,  1884. 

Brown,  H.,  History  of  Illinois.     New  York,  1844. 

Bulletin  of  the  Bureau  of  Rolls  and  Library,  No.  i.     Washington. 

Butler,  Mann,  History  of  the  Commonwealth  of  Kentucky.     Louisville,  1834. 

Cahokia  Records,  MSS.  in  the  Archives  of  St.  Clair  County,  Belleville,  111. 

Calendar  of  Virginia  State  Papers.     Vols,  i.-v.     Richmond,  1875  S. 

633 


634  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Canadian  Archives  Reports.     Ottawa,  1882  ff. 

Channing,  E.,  Town  and  County  Government  in  the  English  Colonies  oj 

North  America.     J.  H.  U.  Studies,  ii.,  No.  10.     Baltimore,  1884. 
Chicago  Historical  Society's  Collections,  iv.     Chicago,  1890. 
Chittenden,  H.  M.,  American  Fur  Trade  oj  the  Far  West.    3  vols.    New  York, 

1902. 
Chitwood,  O.  P.,  Justice  in  Colonial  Virginia.     J.  H.  U.  Studies,  Series 
xxiii.,  No.  7.     Baltimore,  1905. 

Clapin,  Sylva,  Dictionnaire  Canadien-Francais.    Montreal  and  Boston,  1894. 
Clark's  Sketch  o]  his  Campaign  in  the  Illinois.     Ohio   Valley  Historical 

Series,  No.  3.     Cincinnati,   1869. 
Coffin,  Victor,  The  Province  0}  Quebec  and  the  Early  American  Revolution. 

University  of  Wisconsin  Bulletin,  i.     Madison,  1896. 
Collot,  Victor,  Voyage  dans  L'Amerique  Septentrionale.    2  vols.    Paris,  1826. 
Craig,  O.  J.,  ''Ouiatanon",  in  Indiana  Historical  Society's  Publications, 

ii.     Indianapolis,  1895. 
Davidson,  A.,  and  Stuve,  B.,  A  Complete  History  oj  Illinois.     Springfield, 

1874. 
Dillon,  J.,  History  oj  Indiana.     Indianapolis,  1859. 
Documents  relating  to  the  Colonial  History  oj  New  York.    Vol.  vii.    Albany, 

1856. 
Doniol,  Henri,  Histoire  de  la  Participation  de  la  France  a  L' Etablissement 

des  Etats-Unis  d'Amerique.     5  vols.     Paris,  1890. 
Douglas,  W.  B.,  ''Jean  Gabriel  Cerre,  a  Sketch,"  in  Transactions  of  the 

Illinois  State  Historical  Society  for  1903.     Springfield,  1904. 
Draper  MSS.,  in  the  Library  of  the  Wisconsin  Historical  Society.     Madison. 
Dunn,  J.  P.,  "Father  Gibault",  in  Transactions  of  the  Illinois  Historical 

Society    for    1905.     Springfield,    1906. 
Indiana.     Boston,  1905. 
English,  W.  H.,  Conquest  oj  the  Country  Northwest  oj  the  River  Ohio  and 

Lije  oj  George  Rogers  Clark.     2  vols.     Indianapolis,  1896. 
Ferriere,  Claude  de.  Corps  et  Compilation  de  Tous  les  Commentateurs  An- 

ciens  et  Moderns  sur  la  Coutume  de  Paris.    4  vols.     2d   ed.,    Paris 

1714. 
Franklin,  Benjamin,  Works  oj.  ed.  by  J.  Bigelov/.    10  vols.    NewYork,  1887- 

1889. 
Franz,  Alexander,  Die  Kolonisation  des  Mississipitales  bis  zum  Ausgange 

der  Franzosischen  Heershajt.     Leipzig,  1906. 
Fowler,  W.  W.,  City-State  oj  the  Greeks  and  Romans.     London,  1902. 
Eraser's  Report.     MS.  copy  in  Champaign  Public  Library. 
Gayarre,  C.  E.  A.,  History  oj  Louisiana.     4th  ed.     New  Orleans,  1906. 
Glasson,  E.,  Histoire  du  Droit  et  des  Institutions  de  la  France.      8  vols. 

Paris,  1887-1903. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  635 

Greene,  E.  B.,  The  Government  of  Illinois.     New  York,  1904. 

Green,  T.  M.,  Historic  Families  oj  Kentucky.     Cincinnati,  1889. 
Spanish  Conspiracy.     Cincinnati,  1891. 

Hall,  James,  Romance  of  Western  History.     Cincinnati,  1857. 

Hall,  Judge,  Letters  from  the  West.     London,  1828. 

Harding,  Julia  M.,  "  Colonel  George  Morgan  ",  in  Washington  (Pa.)  Obser- 
ver, May  21,  1904. 

Hening,  W.  W.,  Statutes  at  Large  (of  Virginia).  Vols,  i.-v.,  ix.,  x.  Rich- 
mond, 182 1. 

Hinsdale,  B.  A.,  The  Old  Northwest.     Rev.  ed..  New  York,  1899. 

History  0]  Monroe,  Randolph  and  Perry  Counties,  Illinois.  Philadelphia, 
1883. 

History  of  St.  Clair  County,  Illinois.     Philadelphia,  1881. 

Houck,  Louis,  The  Boundaries  oj  the  Louisiana  Purchase.     St.  Louis,  1901. 

Houston,  W.,  Documents  Illustrative  oj  the  Canadian  Constitution.  Toronto, 
1891. 

Howard,  E.  E.,  An  Introduction  to  the  Local  Constitutional  History  of  the 
United  States.     2  vols.     Baltimore,  1889. 

Hutchins,  Thomas,  A  Topographical  Description  of  Virginia,  Pennsyl- 
vania, Maryland  and  North  Carolina,  ed.  by  F.  C.  Hicks.  Cleve- 
land, 1904. 

Illinois  Historical  Collections.     Vol.  i.     Springfield,  1903. 

Imlay,  Gilbert,  Topographical  Description  of  the  Western  Territory.  3d  ed., 
London,  1797. 

Ingle,  E.,  Local  Institutions  of  Virginia.  J.  H.  U.  Studies,  iii.,  nos.  2,  3. 
Baltimore,  1885. 

"Intercepted  Letters  and  Journal  of  George  Rogers  Clark,  1778,  1779," 
in  American  Historical  Review,  i.,  90. 

Isambert,  Decrusy,  Taillandier.  Recueil  General  des  Anciennes  Lois  Fran- 
daises.     28  vols.     Paris,  1829. 

Jenning^s  Journal,  MS.  in  Pennsylvania  Historical  Society's  library. 

Journal  A .  oj  the  Company  oj  David  McCrae,  John  Kay,  Pierre  Barthe,  and 
Charles  Gratiot.  MS.  volume  in  the  possession  of  Pierre  Chouteau 
of  St.  Louis. 

Journal  oj  the  Continental  Congress.  Library  of  Congress  edition.  Wash- 
ington, 1905  ff. 

Journal  oj  the  House  oj  Delegates  {Virginia),  October  Session,  1778  and  178 1. 

Journal  oj  the  Northwestern  Commissioners.     MS.  in  Virginia  State  Library. 

Journal  oj  the  Senate  {Virginia),  October  Session,  1778. 

Journal  oj  Congress.     Vols,  iv.-xi.     Philadelphia,  1800  ff. 

Jousse,  Traiti  de  U Administration  de  la  Justice.     2  vols.     Paris,  1771. 

Kaskaskia  Records.  MSS.  in  the  Archives  of  Randolph  County,  Chester, 
Illinois. 


636  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Kingsford,  Wm.,  History  oj  Canada.     10  vols.     Toronto,  1887-1898. 
Latrobe,  C.  J.,  The  Rambler  in  North  America.     2  vols.     London,  1835. 
Martin,  H.  T.,  Castorologia  or  the  History  and  Traditions  0}  the  Canadian 

Beaver.     Montreal  and  London,   1892. 
Mason,  E.  G.,  Chapters  from  Illinois  History.     Chicago,  1901. 

Early  Illinois  Citizens.     Chicago  Historical  Society's  Collections,  iv. 

Chicago,  1890. 
John  Todd's  Papers.     Ibid. 
John  Todd's  Record-Book.     Ibid. 
Rocheblave  Papers.     Ibid. 
McLaughlin,  A.  C,  "The  Western  Posts  and  the  British  Debts",  in  the 

Annual  Report  of  the  American  Historical  Association,  1894. 
Memorial  of  Timothe  de  Monbreun.  MS.  in  Virginia  State  Library. 
Menard  Collection,   Tardiveau  Papers.     MSS.  in  IlHnois  State  Historical 

Library. 
Michigan  Pioneer  and  Historical  Collections.     36  vols.     Lansing,  1877  ff. 
Military  Journal  o]  Major  Ebenezer  Denny.     Publications  of  the  Historical 

Society  of  Pennsylvania.     Philadelphia,  i860. 
Missouri  Historical  Society's  Collections,  ii.,  No.  6.     St.  Louis,  1906. 
Missouri  Reports.     Vol.  iv.     St.  Louis,  1870. 
Monette,  J.  W.,  History  of  the  Valley  o]  the  Mississippi.     2  vols.     New 

York,  1846. 
Morehead,  Settlement  oj  Kentucky.     Frankfort,  1840. 
Morgan,  George,  Letter-Book,  lydy-iydS.     MS.  volume  in  the  possession 

of  A.  S.  M.  Morgan  of  Pittsburg. 
Moses,  John,  Court  oj  Inquiry.     Chicago  Historical  Society's  Collections, 
iv.     Chicago,  1890. 
Illinois,  Historical  and  Statistical.     2  vols.     Chicago,   1890. 
MSS.  in  Virginia  State  Library. 

New  York  State  Library  Bulletin,  No.  58.,  History  6.     Albany,  1902. 
Ogg,  F.  A.,  The  Opening  oj  the  Mississippi.     New  York,  1904. 
Papers  oj  the  Old  Congress.     MSS.  in  the  Library  of  Congress. 
Parkman,  Francis,  The  Old  Regime  in  Canada.     2  vols.     Boston,  1905. 
Peck,  J.  M.,  A  Gazetteer  oj  Illinois.     Philadelphia,  ist  ed.,  183 1  2d  ed.,  1837. 

Annals  oj  the  West.     St.  Louis,  1850. 
Perrault,  J.  B.,  "Narrative",  in  Schoolcraft,  Indian  Antiquities.      Pt.  iii. 

Philadelphia,  1853. 
Phelps,  Albert,  Louisiana.     Boston  and  New  York,  1905. 
Pittman,  P.,  The  Present  State  oj  the  European  Settlements  on  the  Mississippi. 
London,  1770. 
Ibid,  ed.  by  F.  H.  Hodder.     Cleveland,  1906. 
Reynolds,  John,  My  Own  Times.     Belleville,  1855. 
The  Pioneer  History  oj  Illinois.     Belleville,  1852. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  637 

Roberts,  J.  H.,  Lije  and  Times  oj  General  John  Edgar.     MS.  to  be  printed 

in  the  Transactions  of  the  Illinois  Historical  Society  for  1907. 
Roosevelt,  T.,  The  Winning  0}  the  West.     4  vols.     New  York,  1896. 
Rowland,  Kate  M.,  George  Mason.     2  vols.     New  York,  1892. 
Roy,  J.  E.,  Histoire  du  Notariat  au  Canada.     4  vols.     Levis,  1899. 
,Rozier,  F.  A.,  History  oj  the  Early  Settlement  0}  the  Mississippi  Valley.     St. 

Louis,  1890. 
Secret  Journal  0}  the  Acts  and  Proceedings  oj  Congress.  Vols,  i.-iv.   Boston, 

1821. 
Shea,  J.  G.,  Lije  and  Times  oj  the  Most  Rev.  John  Carroll.     New  York, 

1888. 
Smith,  W.  H.,  St.  Clair  Papers.     2  vols.     Cincinnati,  1882. 
Snyder,  J.  F.,  Captain  Jean  Baptiste  Saucier.     Peoria,  1901. 
Spark's  Collection  oj  Manuscripts,  Harvard  Library.     Cambridge. 
Sparks,  Jared,  The  Diplomatic  Correspondence  oj  the  American  Revolution. 

Vol.  IV.     Washington,  1857. 
The  Writings  oj  Washington.     Vol.  vii.     New  York,  1847. 
Stoddard,  Amos,  Sketches,  Historical  and  Descriptive  oj  Louisiana.     Phila- 
delphia, 181 2. 
Tanguay,  L'Abbe  Cyprien,  Dictionnaire  Genealogique  des  Families  Cana- 

diennes.     7  vols.     Quebec,  1871-1890. 
Tasse,  Joseph,  Les  Canadiens  de  DOuest.    3  vols.    4th  ed.,  Montreal,  1882. 
Thucydides,   History   oj  the   Peloponnesian   War.     Jowett's   Translation. 

Oxford,  1 88 1. 
Thwaites,  R.  G.,  Descriptive  List  oj  Manuscript  Collections  oj  the  State 

Historical  Society  oj  Wisconsin.     Madison,  1906. 
Early  Western  Travels.     Cleveland,   1903  flf. 

i.,  Croghan,  Journals. 

iii.,  Michaud,  Travels. 

xxvii.,  xxviii.,  Flagg,  The  Far  West. 
How  George  Rogers  Clark  won  the  Northwest.     Chicago,  1903. 
The  Jesuit  Relations.     Vol.  Ixxi.     Cleveland,  1901. 
Transactions  of  the  Illinois  State  Historical  Society  for  1903,  1905,  and 

1906.     Springfield,  1 904-1 906. 
Turner,  F.  J.,  "George  Rogers  Clark  and  the  Kaskaskia  Campaign,  1777- 

1778",  in  American  Historical  Review,  viii.     New  York. 
The  Character  and  Influence  oj  the  Indian  Trade  in  Wisconsin.     J.  H.  U. 

Studies,  ix.,  Nos.   11 -12.     Baltimore,   1891. 
"The  Policy  of  France  toward  the  Mississippi  Valley  in  the  Period  of 

Washington  and  Jefferson",  in  American  Historical  Review,  x..  No.  2. 

New  York. 
Van  Tyne,  C.  H.,  The  American  Revolution.     Vol.  ix.  of  Hart's  The  Ameri- 
can Nation.     New  York,  1905. 


638  ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 

Viollet,  P.,  Histoire  du  Droit  Civil  Frangais.     3d  ed.,  Paris,  1905. 
Volney,  C.  F.,  View  oj  the  Climate  and  Soil  oj  the  United  States  of  America. 

A  Translation.     London,  1814. 
Washington  Papers,  MSS.  in  the  Library  of  Congress. 
Winsor,  Justin,  Narrative  and  Critical  History  oj  America.      Vols,  iv.-vi. 

Boston,  1886. 
The  Mississippi  Basin,  1697-1763.     Boston,  1895. 
Westward  Movement.     Boston  and  New  York,   1897. 
Wisconsin  Historical  Collections.     16  vols.     Madison,  1885  ff. 
Withers,  A.  S.,  Chronicles  oj  Border  Warjare.     Ed.  by  R.  G.  Thwaites. 

Cincinnati,  1895. 
Woodward,  Dodge  Genealogy. 


INDEX 


Abbott,  Gov,,  mentioned,  cxxiv. 

Act  creating  County  of  Illinois,  9; 
see  also  ibid,  n.  i. 

Administration  of  justice  by  Court  of 
Cahokia,  Ixiii. 

Agents  to  Congress,  denial  of,  595 ; 
Prevost,  479,  Lebrun,  573,  Cerr6, 
587,  595,  Tardiveau,  591. 

Agreement,  between  Cahokians  and 
Tardiveau,  591 ;  that  court  remain 
French,  cxxxv. 

Alary,  an  American,  361, 

Alarie  (AUary,  allarey,  Alary),  Cle- 
ment, justice,  241-269,  505 ;  plf. 
in  behalf  of  minors,  129,  vs.  Cesirre, 
155,  vs.  Hardouin,  199;  def.  in 
Pillet   vs.,    249;     mentioned,    225, 

573- 
Alarie,  J.  Bte.,  biog.  notice,  631,  n. 
89;    justice,  131-147;    witness,  29, 
401;  land  to,  229;  mentioned,  389, 

573>  593.  614. 

Alarie,  Jos.,  def.  in  Martin  vs.,  55; 
mentioned,  455,  533. 

Alarie,  Mde.,  419. 

Alexandre,  Fr.,  biog.  notice,  631,  n. 
97;  guardian,  47;  witness,  45,,  209. 

Alexis,  savage,  sold,  459. 

Allison  (Ellison),  John,  heirs  of,  321, 
327.  512. 

Amellin,  see  Hamelin. 

Americans,  as  traders  and  settlers  in 
Illinois,  xxvii.,  xxx.,  cxxii.;  assist 
eastern  revolutionists,  xxxii.;  re- 
sponsible for  anarchy,  cxxi. ;  given 
franchise,  cxxxiv.;  contract  with 
Tardiveau,  cxxxviii.;  in  Cahokia, 
cxlviii. ;  attempt  to  set  up  indepen- 
dent court,  cxlviii.;  mentioned,  553. 

American  Bottom,  description  of, 
xiii.,  origin  of  name,  xiii.,  n.  i ;  un- 
healthiness  of,  xiv.;  population  of, 
XV. ;  map  of,  (see  end  of  vol.),  xv., 
n.  I. 

Angers  (Ange),  Aug.,  bondsman,  59; 
plf.  vs.  Gratiot,  109,  in;  def.  in 
Brisson  vs.,  65,  71,  73,  in  Motard 


vs.,  115;  witness,  113;  mentioned, 
125. 

Antaya,  see  Pelletier. 

Appeal  to  Virginia  by  French,  Ixxxiii. ; 
by  Bentley,  cii. 

Arbitration,  trial  by,  160,  n.  i ;  suit 
referred  to,  161,  253,  299,  307,  347, 
387;  verdict  by,  167,  367,  427. 

Ardouin,  see  Hardouin. 

Armant,  see  Harmand. 

Arnoux,  Fr.,  def.  in  Durand  vs.,  155. 

Arpent,  definition  of,  176,  n.  2,  233,  n. 
2. 

Arraignment  of  negro  poisoners  by 
state's  attorney,  19. 

Arundel,  Wm.,  biog.  notice,  306,  n.  2 ; 
affidavit  by,  445;  petitions,  425; 
obtains  summons,  401,  407;  plf. 
vs.  Vaudry,  307,  vs.  Lepage,  315, 
vs.  Morel,  347,  vs.  Coste,  403,  407, 
vs.  Pelletier,  441,  vs.  Cesirre,  441, 
vs.  Lapanc6,  443;  represents  La- 
forme  vs.  Clark,  365;  witness,  523; 
arbitrator,  427;  registers  verdict, 
367,  mentioned,  355,  429,  cxlvii, 
cxlviii. 

Askins,  John,  biog.  notice,  512,  n.  i; 
member  of  Miami  Co.,  511;  gives 
power  of  attorney,  509,  511;  letter 
to,  from  McCarty,  xxxv.;  men- 
tioned, cxlvii. 

Asselin,  Jos.,  plf.  vs.  Dubois,  103, 
105;  def.  in  Saucier  vs.,  75,  in 
Pillet  vs.,  131. 

Assembly  of  inhabitants,  functions  of, 
xxiii. ;  where  held,  xxiii. ;  regulates 
trade,  xxxii.;    mentioned,  61,   129, 

479- 

Assessment  of,  Kaskaskia  for  sup- 
plies, Ixxvii.;    of  Cahokia,  Ixxxiii. 

Aubuchon,  Marie,  widow  of  Locat, 
registers  will  of  husband,  467. 

Backwoodsmen,  description  of,  Ixiv. 

Bacon,   Richard,  mentioned,  xxviii. 

Bailey,  Capt.,  writes  concerning  lack 
of  supplies,  c. 

Balloting,  Ix.,  93,  n.  i 


639 


640 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


Barbau,  J.  B.,  biog.  notice,  Ivi.,  n.  2, 
cxxxii.;  one  of  the  gentry,  xix.; 
favorable  to  colonists,  xxxvi. ;  gives 
financial  aid,  li.;  commandant  of 
Prairie  du  Rocher,  Ivi.,  493 ;  justice, 
Ixi.,  489;  appointed  deputy  county 
lieutenant,  cxxxii. ;  mentioned,  345. 

Baribaud,  Jos.,  def.  in  Saucier  vs., 
267. 

Baribeau,  Le  Petit,  455. 

Baron,  A.,  573. 

Baron,  Bte.,  biog.  notice,  628,  n.  60; 
justice,  131-147;  plf.  vs.  Lambert, 
221;  def.  in  Levy  vs.,  257,  Dumay 
vs.,  285;  juror,  73;  witness,  169; 
mentioned,  225,  573,  593. 

Baron,  Gabriel,  biog.  notice,  632,  n. 
102;  justice,  131-147;  obtains 
summons,  389,  def.  in  Lardoise 
vs.,  245,  Vaudry  vs.,  249,  Vade- 
boncoeur  vs.,  269;  witness,  23; 
contract  of  marriage,  519;  men- 
tioned, 147,  151,  225,  423,  493. 

Barsalous,  minors,  163. 

Barshares,  Tobias,  517. 

Bastien,  Bte.,  negro,  4. 

Bauvais  family,  members  of  the  gen- 
try, xix.;  favorable  to  American 
revolutionists,  xxxvi.;  gives  finan- 
cial aid,  li. 

Bauvais,  Ant.,  elected  justice,  cvii. ; 
cxxxv. ;  president  of  court,  cviii.; 
emigrated,  cxliv. 

Bauvais,  J.  B.,  elected  justice,  cxvi., 
cxxxv.;  emigrated,  cxliv. 

Bauvais,  Vitale,  elected  justice,  cviii., 
cxvi.,  cxxxv.;  pres.  of  court,  cxvii.; 
emigrated,  cxliv. 

Bayles,    Andre,    def.    in   Tusson   vs., 

239- 
Baynton,  Wharton,  and  Morgan,  firm 

trading  in  111.,  xxviii. 
Beadlery,  tax  for,  239,  279. 
Beaulieu,   Michel,   biog.   notice,    627, 

n.    47;     justice,    7-51;     appointed 

captain,    Ivi.;     summoned,    5;    plf. 

vs.     Lecomte,     5;      witness,     471; 

death,  145,  n.  i;  mentioned,  6.  457, 

53I:  545- 
Beaulieu,    Michel,  jr.,    witness,    123; 

mentioned,  481,  483,  627. 
Beaulieu,  Mde.,  biog.  notice,  627,  n. 

43;  plf.  vs.  Harmand,  141,  vs.  Gir- 

ard;  n.223;  def.inGirardinz'^.,  229. 


Beauregard,  (Bourgard),  615;  sells 
peltry  to  Todd,  Ixxxviii. 

Beausoleil,  see  Billet. 

Beausoleil,  Mde.  Pourre,  plf.  vs. 
Harmand,  171;   mentioned,  175. 

Beautheau,  witness,  7. 

Becquet,  (Bequet),  J.  Bte.,  plf.  vs. 
Grandmont,  189;  def.  in  Harmand 
vs.,  173;  witness,  181. 

Becquet,  Ch.,  writ  against,  389. 

Belcour,  (BelCour,  Bellecour),  Jos., 
biog.  notice,  625,  n.  1 1 ;  def.  in  Levy 
vs.,  x'j'j;   mentioned,  139,  573,  593. 

Bell,  juror,  283. 

Bellan,  Michel,  estate  of,  49,  men- 
tioned, 53,  69. 

Bellefeuil,  Jos.,  justice,  147-167; 
signs  ordinance,  567. 

Belief ontaine,  settlement  of,  cxxii. ; 
justice  appointed  at,  cxxii.;  ceases 
to  belong  to  Kaskaskia  district, 
cxxxv.;  joins  Cahokia  district,  cl.; 
court  and  militia  captain  of,  307; 
sets  up  independent  court,  519, 
cxlviii. ;  rights  to  land  in,  cxxxviii. ; 
mentioned,  327,  389,  515. 

Bentley,  Th.,  character  of,  xcvi.; 
trading  company  of,  xxviii.;  ac- 
cused by  Rocheblave,  xxxii. ;  makes 
counter  charges,  ibid,  n.  2;  arrest 
of,  XXXV.,  see  also  ibid,  n.  2 ;  sends 
supplies,  612;  letter  of,  475; 
arrived  in  Kaskaskia,  618;  partner- 
ship with  Dodge,  621,  xcvi.;  report 
on  De  la  Balme,  618;  brings  suit 
against  McCarty  and  Perrault,  ci.; 
refuses  to  take  oath  of  allegiance, 
ibid;  appeals  to  Virginia,  cii.; 
failure  of,  to  realize  on  drafts, 
cviii.;    death  of,  cviii. 

Bergeron,  (Bargeon),  J.  Bte.,  im- 
prisoned, 95;  plf.  vs.  Tabeau,  81, 
vs.  Chartier,  83;  juror,  195,  207; 
mentioned,  225,  419 

Bergeron,  Louis,  plf.  vs.  Dubois,  353. 
Bienvenus,  favorable  to  Amer.  revo- 
lutionists, xxxvi. 
Biggs,  George,  365. 
Biggs,  Th.,  executor  of  Moore's  will 

349,  357>  389,  517-  . 

Biggs,  William,  justice  at  Belief  on- 
taine, 307 ;  plf.  vs.  Morris,  343 ; 
mentioned,  43. 

Big  Hill,  565. 


INDEX 


641 


Biguier  called  Grosl^,  Fr.,  sr.,  271, 355. 

Biguier  called  Grosl6,  Fr.,  jr.,  de- 
ceased, 271,  355. 

Biguier  called  GroslC;  Jos.,  biog. 
notice,  631,  n.  87;  def.  in  Gerosme 
vs.   285,  303. 

Bilelle,  plf.  vs.  Neveux,  91. 

Billet  called  Beausoleil,  Pierre,  oath 
as  clerk,  339;  writ  against,  389; 
plf.  vs.  Lecomte,  259,  vs.  Smith, 
341,  vs.  Clark,  351;  def.  in  Courier 
vs.,  241,  Martin,  vs.,  383;  juror, 
283;  deputy  huissier,  429;  men- 
tioned, 265,  381,  399,  593. 

Billet  called  Grolet,  Jos.,  plf.  vs. 
Lefevre,  165;  def.  in  Harmand  vs., 

.173- 

Bingo,  Moore's  negro,  517. 

Biron,  Henry,  biog.  notice,  628,  n. 
49;  justice,  333-447;  plf-  ^^• 
Chartier,  235;  juror,  195;  men- 
tioned, 151,  225,  237,  357,  593. 

Bishop  of  Quebec,  622;  appoints 
Father  Gibault,  xxv.,  cxxxi. ;  with- 
draws jurisdiction  from  Illinois, 
cxxxv.,  n.  5. 

Bissonette  (Bissonet),  Jos.,  biog. 
notice,  627,  n.  41;  justice,  167-195; 
plf.  vs  Quenel,  183;  witness,  83; 
mentioned,   161,   573. 

Blay,  259. 

Bleakley,  Josiah,  appointed  attorney, 

523- 

Bleomar,  555. 

Blin  (Blain),  George;  biog.  notice, 
629,  n.  72;  pres.  of  court,  93-129, 
131-145;  juror,  73;  executor,  145; 
mentioned,  121,  481;  deceased,  163. 

Blin,  widow  George,  plf.  vs.  Lecomte, 
233;  mentioned,  163. 

Blockhouse  at  Grand  Ruisseau,  289. 

Blondeau,  367,  449. 

Bloiiin,  Daniel,  agent  for  Illinois,  xxxv. 

Blue  Licks,  battle  of,  ex. 

Boisbriant,  593. 

Boismenu,  Nicolas,  biog.  notice, 
628,  n.  48;  plf.  vs.  Hamelin's 
estate,  87. 

Bond,  Shadrach,  executor  of  Moore's 
will,  349.  357'  389*  517;  men- 
tioned, cxxii. 

Bons,  note  on,  218,  n.  i. 

Bosseron,  gives  financial  support,  li. 

Boulin,  definition  of,  284,  n.  i. 


Bournes,  witness,  6. 
Bouthiellier,  Jn.,  witness,  524. 
Bouthiellier,  Peter,  executor  of  Kay's 

will,  523. 
Bouvet,    obtained    writ,    405,    413; 

mentioned,  225. 
Bouvet,  E.,  573. 
Bouvet,  Maturin,  def  in  Cadron  vs., 

391 ;  appointed  judge  at  Kaskaskia, 

cxxxii. 
Bouvet,    Rene,    plf.   vs.    Gaud,    143; 

exchange  of  property  with   Felix , 

3^7- 

Bowman,  Jos.,  biog.  notice,  2,  n.  4; 
occupies  Cahokia,  xlv. ;  arouses 
the  French  to  enthusiasm,  Ixxxiii. ; 
letters  from,  610-613;  justice,  2-8; 
mentioned,  527. 

Boyer,  Ant.,  juror,  195,  207;  men- 
tioned, 163,  225,  457,  481,  573. 

Bracanda,  Fr.,  631. 

Brady  (Bredy),  Th.,  biog.  notice,  627, 
n.  40;  trader,  xxix. ;  justice,  197- 
233;  huissier,  297,  327,  383,  407, 
423;  Indian  commissioner,  130,  n.  i; 
plf.  vs.  Lorens,  265,  vs.  estate  of 
Dubuque,  309;  def.  in  Gaffe  vs., 
159,  Dubuque  vs.,  275,  Dumoulin 
vs.,  383;  witness,  49;  with  Levy 
obtains  trading  privilege,  215; 
land  grant  to,  197;  mentioned, 
129,  159,  413,  457,  573,  579,  593, 
cxlviii. 

Brady,  Mde.,  biog.  notice,  276,  n.  i, 
352,  n.  i;    mentioned,  620. 

Brazeau,  not  reappointed  captain,  Ivi. ; 
elected  justice,  cxvi. ;  cxxxv. ;  men- 
tioned, c. 

Brisbois,  153. 

Brisson,  Alexis,  biog.  notice,  624,  n. 
9;  plf.  vs.  Angers,  65  ;  trial  of,  71; 
assault  by,  334,  n.  i ;  depositions 
in  prosecution  of,  335-339 ;  witness, 
59;    mentioned,  411,  737. 

Brisson,  Woman,  def.  in  Veroneau 
"^^•y  357'  in  Dumoulin  vs.,  359; 
mentioned,  335,  355. 

Brisson,  Pierre,  plf.  vs.  Germain,  329. 

British,  the,  attack  of,  on  Illinois,  531, 
n.  I,  Ixxxvii. ;  expected  attack  from, 
58,  n.  I,  61 ;  agents  of,  in  Illinois, 
92,  n.  2,  553,  555,  559,  cv.;  spies  of, 
cxxiii.;  intrigues  of,  with  Dodge, 
cxxx. 


642 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


British  government  of  the  Illinois, 
XXV. ;  minor  officials,  xxvii. 

.British  merchants  at  Cahokia,  cxlvii. 

British  occupation  of  the  Illinois,  xxv. 

Butard,  Ch.,  626. 

Buteau,  (Butau),  151,  225. 

Buteau,  Ch.,  juror,  73;  mentioned, 
481. 

Buteau,  Jos.,  biog.  notice,  626,  n. 
28;   def.  in  Harmand  'z;^.,  127. 

Buteau,  Marie  Louise,  registers  con- 
tract of  marriage,  493;  mentioned, 
147. 

Buteau,  Michel,  def.  in  Levy  vs.,  113, 
119. 

Buteau's  Point,  565. 

Buyat,  Ant.,  writ  served  on,  405; 
mentioned,  ibid. 

Buyat  Labecasse,  129. 

Buyat,  Mile.,  13. 

Byram,  Benjamin,  summons  to,  405; 
def.  in  Chisholm  vs.,  405. 

Cabassier,  Pierre,  biog.  notice,  631,  n. 
84;    mentioned,    225. 

Cabrie,  negro  sold  to  Turanjeau,  459. 

Cadien,  57,  139,  245;   see  Savoy. 

Cadien,  Charly,  419. 

Cadien,  J.  Bte.,  biog.  notice,  626,  n. 
27. 

Cadron,  Ch.,  biog.  notice,  624,  n. 
10;  plf.  vs.  Bouvet,  391;  men- 
tioned, 133,  279,  573. 

Cahokia  (Cahos,  Cahous,  Cahokias, 
Kahos,  Kahokia),  population,  of 
XV.,  cxlvi.,  624;  description  of 
land  at,  505,  taken  by  Bowman, 
xlv.;  enthusiasm  of  people  of, 
610-613;  levies  in,  Ixxxiii.;  Court 
of  Committee  of,  xlvii.,  2-8; 
inauguration  of  court  of,  Ixi. ;  charter 
of  court  of,  Ixiii.,  Ixxxiv. ;  good 
order  at,  589,  cxlvi.;  people  of, 
send  to  Clark,  Ixxxviii.,  531 ;  hos- 
tility of  people  of,  Ixxiv. ;  De  la 
Balme  in,  620 ;  inhabitants  of,  to  De 
la  Balme,  535;  people  of,  send 
representative  to  Virginia,  ciii., 
479;  British  agents  at,  cv.,  92,  n. 
2,553»555»  559;  petition  of  people 
of,  to  Congress,  567,  581;  men- 
tioned, 123,  253,  299,  555,  557. 

Cahokians,  readiness  in  raising  sup- 
plies, 613;  eagerness  to  volunteer, 
611;  opposition  to  the  mihtary,  614, 


616;  protest  against  claims  of  Pen- 
tecoste,  581;  agreement  of,  with 
Tardiveau,  591;  letter  of,  to  Tar- 
diveau,  595. 

Cahokia  Documents,  English,  610; 
French,  526. 

Cahokia  Records,  account  of,  clii. 

Cahorn  (Kaorn),  plf.  vs.  Grandmont, 
301 ;  juror,  283. 

Caillot  called  Lachance,  Jos.,  biog. 
notice,  624,  n.  7;  vs.  Troge,  199, 
vs.  Dumoulin,  233,  vs.  Lapanc^, 
361,  vs.   Martin,  361;    mentioned, 

217.  353»  355»  413- 

Camp,  deceased,  255. 

Camp  (Caimps),  widow,  253. 

Campbell,  John,  appointed  land 
agent,  Ixx. 

Camus,  Fr.,  plf.  vs.  Hardouin,  191. 

Canada,  Illinois  settlers  from,  xvii. ; 
trade  intercourse  with,  xvii.,  xxvii., 
xxxi.,  civ.,  cxlvii.;  families  from, 
624  et  seq.;    mentioned,  313,  371, 

375- 

Canadien,  Francois,  337. 

Cantine,  a  creek  near  Cahokia,  29. 

Carbonneaux,  Fr.,  elected  clerk  of 
court  of  Kaskaskia,  Ixi.;  opposes 
appointment  of  another  notary, 
cvi.;  member  of  Winston's  party, 
Ixxxvi.,  cxii. ;  representative  to 
Virginia,  cxviii. ;  makes  deposition 
concerning  conditions,  cxx.;  emi- 
gration of,  cxliv. 

Carroll,  John,  Prefect  Apostolic,  cxxxi. 

Cascakia  see  Kaskaskia. 

Cattle  of  French,  shot  by  Virginians, 
Ixvii.,  cvi. 

Census  of  Cahokia,  624. 

Cerre  (Ceres),  Gabriel,  biog.  notice, 
XX.,  n.  2;  leader  of  British  party, 
xxxvii.;  absent  at  occupation  of 
Kaskaskia,  xli. ;  won  over  by  Clark, 
xliv. ;  gives  financial  aid,  li.,  n. 
3 ;  elected  justice,  Ix. :  settles  in 
St.  Louis,  Ixxxiii.;  accused  by 
Bentley,  c;  plf.  vs.  Harmand,  135, 
i37»  195;  attaches  Harmand's 
property,  193 ;  charges  for  supplies, 
616;  executor  of  Locat's  will,  471, 
of  Jas.  Moore's  will,  347,  517; 
agent  to  Congress,  585,  595 ;  men- 
tioned, Ixxv.,  cvii.,  55,  59,  85,  167, 
187,  341,  357,  485- 


INDEX 


643 


Cesirre,  Hyacinthe,  349. 

Cesirre  (Cecire,  Cecirre),  Jos.,  225; 
biog.  notice,  625,  n.  12;  justice, 
93-129;  summons  served  on,  411; 
plf.  vs.  Grandmont,  165;  def.  in 
Alarie  vs.,  155,  Arundel  vs.,  441, 
Harmand  vs.,  loi,  Lamarche  vs., 
175,  Lemay  vs.,  133;  death  of, 
Ivi.;  mentioned,  xxxvi.,  145,  169, 
357,481,573. 

Chabot,  Nicolas,  oath  as  bailiff,  5 1 ; 
oath  as  sheriff,  95,  131 ;  mentioned, 

4S7>  553- 

Chalfont,  355. 

Champlin,  229. 

Chanarde,  P.,  449. 

Charieville,  Charles,  elected  justice, 
Ixi. ;  mentioned,  489,  610. 

Charieville  family,  members  of  the 
gentry,  xix. ;  favorable  to  the  Amer. 
revolutionists,  xxxvi.;  give  finan- 
cial aid,  li. ;   emigrated,  cxliv. 

Charieville,  Fr.,  elected  justice,  cxvi. 

Charieville,  J.  B.,  elected  justice, 
cvii. 

Charly  (Charle)  called  St.  Ange 
Michel,  biog.  notice,  626,  n.  25; 
plf.  vs.  Grandmont,  279,  vs.  Har- 
douin,  239:  def.  in  Labuxiere  vs., 
7,  Lacroix  vs.,  8. 

Charpentier  (Charpantier),  Pierre, 
witness,  169;   mentioned,  183,  235. 

Chartier,  Michel,  def.  in  Bergeron  vs., 
83,  Biron  vs.,  235,  Levy  vs.,  183, 
Saucier  vs.,  343. 

Chartran,  Amable,  biog.  notice,  631, 
n.  86. 

Chartran,  Bte.,  plf.  vs.  Troge,  287. 

Chatel,  Louis,  biog.  notice,  630,  n. 
75;  justice,  167-195,  241-289, 
339-505;  witness,  77;  as  attorney, 
73;    mentioned,  225,  229,  573 

Chatelereau,  writ  against,  389;  men- 
tioned, 297. 

Chatigny,  Ignace,  accused  and  placed 
under  bond,  59;  imprisoned,  65; 
def.  in  Morel  vs.,  305,  Coste  vs., 

399- 
Chatigny     called     Lacouture,     Jos., 

biog.  notice,  631,  n.  85;  land  grant 

to,  229;  see  Lacouture. 
Chauvin,  Jean,  biog.  notice,  627,  n. 

46. 
Chauvin,  Pierre,  129,  455. 


Chenier  (Chesnier),  573. 

Chenier,  Claude,  biog.  notice,  628,  n. 

54- 
Chevalier,  279. 
Chevalier,    Fr.,    obtained   writ,    393; 

plf.  vs.  Ciquar  and  Lavertu,  373. 
Chevalier,  Pierre,  573. 
Chief  Flee,  31. 
Chief  Wolf,  31. 
Chisholm,     Hugh     McD.,     plf.     vs. 

Clark,  329,  331,  vs.  Byram,  345. 
Chouteau,   Auguste,   surety  for  note 

of  Robidou,  523;   mentioned,  cxlii. 
Chretien,  Fr.,  juror,  73. 
Chretien  (Chrestien,  Cretien),  Pierre, 

biog.  notice,  628,  n.  50. 
Church,  Catholic,  of  U.  S.,  extended 

to  Illinois,  cxxxi. 
Churches,  description  of  the,  xxiv. 
Church  wardens,  249,  269,  xxiv. 
Ciquar,  Louis,  def.  in  Chevalier  vs., 

373- 

Clairmont,  see  Clermont. 

Glamorgan,  Jacques,  biog.  notice, 
238,  n.  3;  accused  of  robbery,  385 ; 
plf.  vs.  Duchesnau,  305,  vs.  Wood, 
331,  vs.  Piggot,  363,  vs.  LaCoste, 
409,  vs.  Coste,  435,  intervening  in 
Laforme  vs.  Clark,  367 ;  mentioned, 
239>  355.  421. 

Clark,  Francis,  writ  against  and  arrest 
of,  389;  obtains  summons,  405; 
def.  in  Chisholm  vs.,  329,  331, 
Billet  vs.,  351,  Laforme  vs.,  365; 
witness,  519;  mentioned,  355,  357, 
421,  541. 

Clark,  Geoige  Rogers,  sends  spies  to 
Kaskaskia,  xxxix. ;  ignorant  of 
Amer.  party  in  Illinois,  xxxix.,  xlii. ; 
his  plan  to  make  attack,  xxxix.; 
the  occupation  of  Illinois,  xlii. ;  wins 
support  of  Cerre,  xliv. ;  critical 
situation  of,  xlvi. ;  acts  as  judge, 
xlvi. ;  establishes  courts,  xlvii. ; 
speech  by,  at  inauguration  of  court, 
Iviii.;  letters  to,  from  Gratiot,  527, 
555,  from  Cahokians,  531,  from 
Linctot,  553,  from  Bowman,  610, 
611,  612,  613,  from  McCarty,  617; 
repels  attack  on  Cahokia,  Ixxxviii. ; 
makes  expedition  against  Shawnees, 
Ixxxix. ;  approves  of  immigration, 
Ixx. ;  land  granted  to,  581,  621; 
letter   from,    concerning   dishonest 


644 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


practices  of  officers,  xcix. ;  letter 
from,  to  court  of  Kaskaskia,  cix. ; 
attacks  Miamis,  ex.;  approves  of 
Bentley,  cviii.;  advises  French  to 
revive  former  magistracy,  cxxix. ; 
unauthorized  attack  on  Indians, 
cxxxiii. ;  never  received  recompense, 
Ixvii. ;  mentioned,  civ  ,  i,  449,  479, 

537.  539- 
Clark  MSB.,  account  of,  cliii. 
Clermont  (Clairmont,  Clemont),  507, 

553- 
Clermont,  Louis,  biog.  notice,  628,  n. 

61;  petitions,  loi. 
Clermont,  Joseph,  93. 
Code   of   Laws   and   Bill  of  Rights, 

Ixii.,  cxxv. 
Colin,  Jean  Bte.,  335. 
Collins,  Thomas,  trader,  xxix. 
Commissioners  from  Virginia,   cxix., 

cxx. 
Commons,  description  of,  xxii.;    law 

of,  89,  n.  I,  615. 
Common  field,  description  of,  xxii.,  see 

also,  46,  n.  2;    gate  of,  138,  n.  2. 
Commodities  paid  for  tithes,  price  of, 

369- 
Community  of  goods,  note  on,  272,  n. 
I,  276,  n.  i;    renunciation  of,  271, 

371- 

"Companion  of  Young  Men,"  men- 
tioned in  will  of  Moore,  517. 

Compte,  Aime,  elected  justice,  cxvi.; 
reappearance  of,  as  judge,  cxxvi. ; 
def .  in  LaCroix  vs.,  32 1 ;  mentioned, 

573- 

Compte,  Louis,  biog.  notice,  629,  n.  68. 

Comte,  Jos.,  321. 

Concessions  of  land,  Ixxxv. ;  to  French 
by  U.  S.,  cxxi. 

Conclusion  of  petition,  184,  n.  i. 

Conet,  M.,  sergeant,  325. 

Congress,  memorial  to,  567,  581 ; 
letter  to,  589;  agent  to,  479,  573, 
5^7'  595 ;  action  of,  on  petitions, 
cxxx. ;  reply  of,  reaches  Kaskaskia, 
cxxxiii. ;  memorials  of  Tardiveau 
to,  cxxxix. 

Conn,  John,  estate  of,  59 ;  mentioned, 

55- 
•  Connecticut,  465. 

Constant,  Gabriel,  plf.  vs.  Lapance 
45,  vs.  Harmand,  133;  witness,  25; 
mentioned,  3,  553. 


Continentals,  passed  at  par,  xlix  ; 
called  in,  Ixxi. 

Contracts  of  marriage,  493,  519. 

Cornwallis,  surrender  of,  ex. 

Correspondence  with  Congress,  diffi- 
culties of,  589,  cxxix. 

Corset,  Fr.,  elected  justice,  cxvi., 
cxxxv. ;    emigrated,   cxliv. 

Coste,  Louis,  order  to  arrest,  407; 
obtains  writ,  381,  411;  writ  served 
on,  401,  407;  plf.  vs.  Chatigny, 
399;  def.  in  Arundel  vs.,  403,  407, 
Laille  vs.,  421,  Glamorgan  vs., 
435;  mentioned,  413. 

Cotton  de  Maillier,  negro  sold  to 
Turanjeau,  459. 

County  of  Illinois,  history  of  Act 
creating,  cxviii.,  see  also,  9,  n.  i ; 
limits  of,  lii.;  establishment  of, 
ibid. 

County  courts  of  Virginia,  the  model 
for  those  of  Illinois,  xlviii. 

County  government,  relation  of  Ca- 
hokia  to,  cxlvii. 

Coureurs  de  hois,  description  of,  xviii. 

Courier  (Courie,  Courrier),  Fr.,  biog. 
notice,  629,  n.  66;  justice,  51-93, 
147-167,  197-233;  churchwarden, 
269;  plf.  vs.  Billet,  241;  juror, 
195;     mentioned,    183,    243,    481, 

553>  573>  579- 

Court  vs.  Pepin,  437. 

Court  of  Com.  of  Cahokia,  2-8;  date 
of  establishment  of,  xlvii. 

Court  of  Cahokia,  good  administra- 
tion of,  cxlvi. ;  prevents  estab- 
lishment of  independent  American 
court,  cxlix. ;   end  of,  cl. 

Court  of  inquiry  concerning  charges 
against  Rocheblave,  xxxii.,  n.  2. 

Court  of  judicature  under  British 
period,  Ivii. 

Court  of  Kaskaskia,  Clark  possibly 
mistaken  about  establishment  of, 
xlviii.,  n.  I ;  memorial  of,  to  Todd, 
Ixvii.;  prohibits  exports,  Ixxvii.; 
people  protest  to,  Ixxx. ;  letter  of,  to 
Montgomery,  Ixxxi. ;  opposes  Bent- 
ley,  ci.;  lettei  of,  to  Rogers,  ihid; 
refuses  to  support  Winston,  cxiv. ; 
abolished,  cxvii. ;  revival  of,  cxxxiv. ; 
end  of  revived,  cxl. 

Courts,  estabHshed  by  Todd,  Ivii.; 
discussion  of,  Ixii.;    champions  of 


INDEX 


645 


French,  Ixvi. ;   established  at  Belle- 

fontaine  and  Grand  Ruisseau,  307, 

cxxii.,  cl. 
Courtois,  plf .  vs.  Renoux,  287 ;  juror, 

283. 
Courville,  265. 
Courville,  Cocue,  457. 
Courville,  Mde.,  31. 
Courville,   Pierre,   biog.  notice,   622, 

n.  30. 
Coidume  de  Paris,  Ixiii. 
Cowley  (Courley),   Abraham,   works 

of,  517- 
Creoles,  557. 
Cruickshanks,    Robert,    executor    of 

Kay's  will,  523. 
Cruzat,     Fr.,     commandant    at    St. 

Louis,  letter  of,  to  court  at  Cahokia, 

515;    arrests   British   agents,    553, 

55S»   559.   cv.;    duplicity  of,   cv.; 

seizes  deserters  on  U.  S.  soil,  cxxvi. ; 

mentioned,  279,  305,  375. 
Cul  de  sac,  fences  of,  159. 
Cumberland,  307. 
Curator,  law  of,  96,  n.  i. 
Dalton,     writes    concerning    De    la 

Balme,  618. 
Dau,  (D'au),  25. 
Deane,    Silas,    recommends    De    la 

Balme,  xc. 
Dechene,  Le  Beau,  445. 
Decoste,  J.  Bte.,  plf.  vs.  Lussier,  41 ; 

mentioned,  i;    see  also  Coste. 
Defence,  order  for,  33;    preparations 

for,  61 ;    co-operation  with  Spanish 

for,  59. 
Dehay,  see  Deshayes. 
Dejean,    Judge,   released   on  parole, 

xcvi.;    desires  to  send  to  Detroit, 

477- 

Dempsey,  John,  biog.  notice,  407,  n. 
3;  mentioned,  407. 

Denau,  def.  with  Lepage  in  Lasou- 
dxay  vs.,  7;  mentioned,  457. 

Denier,  definition  of,  192,  n.  2. 

De  Peyster  (Depoister),  Major,  612. 

Deshayes  called  St.  Cyr  (Dehay, 
Desayes),  J.  Bte.,  biog.  notice,  624, 
n.  5;  justice,  147-167;  mentioned, 
225,  481. 

Deslongchamps  see  Hubout. 

Desjardins  called  Gonneville,  J. 
Bte.,  biog.  notice,  627,  n.  45;  men- 
tioned, 359. 


Desjardins,  359. 

Desloges  (Deloge),  Jos.,  75;  see 
Poirier. 

Desloges,  Renard,  457. 

Des  Ursins,  593. 

Detolsey,  Mde.,  8. 

D'etre,  457. 

Detroit,  expedition  planned  against, 
xxxiv.;  Clark  plans  to  attack, 
Ixxvi. ;  De  la  Balme  plans  to  attack, 
xci.,  xcii. ;  intercourse  with,  569; 
mentioned,  509,  612. 

Dion,  Fr.,  biog.  notice,  626,  n.  26. 

Disease  of  cattle,  203. 

Dishonesty,  accusations  of,  xcvii., 
xcviii. 

Districts,  judicial,  in  Illinois,  Ivii. 

Dodge,  John,  biog.  notice  of,  xcv.; 
historical  sources  for  acts  of,  cxxviii., 
n.  4;  Indian  agent,  xcv.;  partner- 
ship with  Bentley,  xcv.,  xcvi.,  621; 
land  grant  to,  Ixxxv. ;  actions  to  be 
investigated,  xcix.;  friendly  to  De 
la  Balme,  620;  testifies  concerning 
Bentley,  cviii. ;  leaves  Kaskaskia, 
cii. ;  returns,  cix. ;  arrests  Winston, 
cxiv. ;  position  of,  at  Kaskaskia, 
cxiii.,  cxxvii. ;  party  of,  cxii. ;  con- 
nection with  De  Monbreun,  cxxiv. ; 
seizes  old  fort,  cxxviii.,  see  also, 
ibid,  n.  i,  569;  petitions  Congress, 
cxxix. ;  opposes  Clark,  cxxxiii.; 
leaves  Kaskaskia,  cxxxiv.;  relation 
of,  to  Tardiveau,  cxxxvi. ;  attack 
of,  on  Langlois,  cxxxviii. ;  leads 
Indians  into  Kaskaskia,  cxlii.; 
mentioned,  c,  569. 

Dodge,  Israel,  mentioned,  cxiii. 

Donation  of  goods,  80,  n.  i,  81,  469, 

519- 
Dorciere,  attorney  for  Cerre,  515. 
Dorion,  507. 
Dorion,  Jean  Marie,  biog.  notice,  626, 

n.  31;    note  of  Robidou  to,   521; 

mentioned,  225. 
Dorion,    Pierre,    plf.   vs.   Ducharme, 

75;    mentioned,  481,  573. 
Dornon,  457. 

Drafts,  difficulty  concerning,  cxix. 
Draper     Manuscripts,     account     of, 

cliii. 
Drouart,  457. 
Dube,  Jos.,  def.  in  Laurins  vs.,  105; 

mentioned,  553. 


646 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


Dubois  (Durbois),  65  et  seq.,  109. 

Dubois  (Durbois),  J.  Bte.,  plf.  vs. 
Harmand;  def.  in  Bergeron,  vs., 
353. 

Dubois,  Mich.,  plf.  vs.  Martin,  57. 

Dubois,  Pierre,  biog.  notice,  629,  n. 
65 ;  def.  in  Asselin  vs.,  103,  105 ; 
Huberdeau  vs.,  431;  mentioned, 
381. 

Dubreuil  (De  Breuil),  plf.  vs.  Trottier, 
259;    mentioned,  2,  259,  385. 

Dubreuil  St.  Cyr,  483. 

Dubuque,  365,  481,  573. 

Dubuque,  Augustin,  biog.  notice,  310, 
n.  i;  oath  of  allegiance,  265;  plf. 
vs.  JBrady,  275,  vs.  Martin,  283; 
def.  in  Martin  vs.,  277,  Dumoulin 
vs.,  283;  appointed  attorney,  505; 
transfers  same,  509;  petitions  for 
Jautard's  claim,  497;  mentioned, 
379»  505?  625;  estate  of,  note  on, 
310,  n.  I,  378.  n.  I ;  property  of, 
429>  513;  trustee  of,  313,  393; 
rights  of  preferred  creditors  of,  311; 
of  alien  creditors,  313;  def.  in 
Lafleur  and  Brady  vs.,  309,  Lonval 
vs.,  315,  Lacroix  vs.,  323,  widow 
vs.,  371,  Huberdeau  vs.,  375;  in 
Gamelin  vs.  Gigon,  378. 

Dubuque,  J.  Bte.,  biog.  notice,  629, 
n.  67;  commandant,  265,  267; 
justice,  93-i29,_  133-147,  197-233, 
339-441 ;  magistrate  for  fences, 
221;  juror,  195;  witness,  475; 
mentioned,  243   339,  401,  405,  579, 

593- 
Dubuque,  Julien,  625,  n.  15. 
Dubuque,     Mde.     Archange    Pratte, 

widow  of  Augustin,  rights  of,  313; 

sues   for   dower,    371;    mentioned, 

325,  377- 

Deschamp,  253. 

DuCharme,  109,  115,  327,  367,  593. 

DuCharme,  Charles,  biog.  notice, 
628,  n.  56;  justice,  5i-93>  197-233. 
297-447;  church  warden,  269;  plf. 
vs.  Roy;  def.  in  Dolion  vs.,  75; 
juror,  195;  attorney  for  Trottier, 
259;    mentioned,  67,  243,  455,  579. 

DuCharme,  Laurent,  169,  283. 

Duchenau,  summons  served  on,  413; 
def.  in  Clamorgan  vs.,  305. 

Duchenau,  Fr.,  witness,  417;  men- 
tioned, 183. 


Dumay  (Dumai),  J.  Bte.,  biog.  notice, 
626,  n.  32;  justice,  167-195;  plf, 
vs.  Mallet,  151,  vs.  Baron,  285,  vs. 
Michaels,  297;  def.  in  LaCurie 
vs.,  257;  witness,  113;  juror,  207; 
contract  of  marriage,  519;  men- 
tioned, 193,  225,  237,  519,  573. 

Dumoulin,  Jean,  biog.  notice,  230,  n. 
i;  obtains  writ,  401;  summons 
served  on,  411;  plf.  vs.  Troge,  217, 
vs.  Dubuque,  283,  vs.  Gervais,  349, 
vs.  Woman  Brisson,  359,  vs.  Brady, 
383,  vs.  LaCoste,  409,  vs.  Pencrasse, 
423;  def.  in  Caillot  vs.,  233,  Lori- 
mier  vs.,  299,  Germain  vs.,  361, 
Harmand  vs.,  443 ;  arbitrator,  369, 
427 ;  receives  power  of  attorney,  509 ; 
mentioned,  231,  351,  355,  421,  423, 

457.  524- 
Dunmore,  Lord,  interested  in  western 

lands,  xxix. 
Duplasy,    Jos.,    favorable    to    Amer. 

revolutionists,     xxxvi. ;      appointed 

captain,   Ivi. ;    elected  justice,   Ixi. ; 

leads   De   la   Balme's   party,    620 ; 

death  of,   cvii. 
Dupuis,  573. 
Durand  (Durant),   def.   in  Harmand 

vs.,  173;   mentioned,  53,  55,  455. 
Durand,  Marie,  plf.  vs.  Arnoux,  155; 

note  of,    213;    mentioned,   53,   55, 

455- 
Durocher,  Laurent,  85,  492,  n.  i. 
Duverger,     Fr.,    Forget,    priest    and 

'grand  vicar,  sale  of  land  by,  499, 

507- 

Eagle  River,  settlement  at,  307; 
mentioned,  433,  597. 

Ecu,  definition  of,  44,  n   3. 

Edgar,  John,  biog.  notice  of,  cxxxiii., 
n.  3;  pledges  support  to  French 
court,  cxxxv. ;  estimate  to  Kaskas- 
kians,  cxl.;  attacked  by  Dodge, 
cxlii. ;  threatens  to  leave  Kaskaskia, 
cxlv. 

Edict  of  1763,  prohibits  settlements 
in  Northwest,  xxix. 

Elections,  regularity  and  irregularity 
of,  Ixxxiv. ;  of  justices  of  Cahokia, 
Ixi.,  51,  93,  131,  147.  167,  197,  241, 
297,  339,  cxlvi.;  of  justices  of  Kas- 
kaskia, Ix.,  cvii.,  ex.,  cL,  cxxxiv. ; 
of  justices  at  Prairie  du  Rocher, 
Ixi.,  cxvi. ;    at  St.  Philippe,  Ixi. 


INDEX 


647 


Elliot,  American  spy  in  west  and  cor- 
respondent of  Morgan,  xxxiv.,  n.  2. 

Ellison,  see  Allison. 

Emigration  to  Spanish  settlements, 
Ixxxiii.,  cxli.,  cxlii. 

Engel  (Angel),  Ph.,  biog.  notice,  631, 
n.  96;  justice,  197-233,  297-327, 
339-447;  plf-  '^s-  Pentecoste,  255; 
attorney  for  St.  Pierre,  393;  wit- 
ness, 209;  juror,  195;  mentioned, 
325;  32 7»  593>  cxlviii. 

Escalin,  definition  of,  176,  n.  i. 

Estates  of  Virginia,  597. 

Et^,  Etienne,  457. 

Etienne,  savage  sold  to  Cadien,  459. 

Evacuation  of  Illinois  planned,  Ixxx- 
vii.,  619;  partially  carried  out, 
xcv. ;  final,  cix. 

Exportations  prohibited,  Ixxvii. 

Expositive,  definition  of,  192,  n.  i. 

Extract  from  the  Registers  of  the 
Magistracy  of   Cahokia,    449-525. 

Fagot,  Jr.,  455. 

Falls,  G.  R.  Clark  at,  559. 

Farelle,  J.,  381. 

Faucher,  notary  of  Quebec,  371. 

Felix,  J.  Bte.,  plf.  vs.  Lapanc6,  317. 

Fence,  Common,  221;   party,  255. 

Ferrant,  late,  51,  53. 

Filet,  definition  of,  418,  n.  i. 

Financial  aid,  from  Virginia,  Ixvii., 
li.;   from  French,  xlvi.,  li.,  Ixxvi. 

Finney,  James,  def.  in  Louigaud  vs., 
49. 

Florida,  555. 

Foreign  Missions,  Seminary  of,   223, 

499»  507- 

Forgery  of  paper  money,  Ixxi. 

Forget,  207. 

Ft.  Bowman  at  Cahokia,  Ixxvi.,  3. 

Ft.  Clark  at  Kaskaskia,  Ixxvi. 

Ft.  de  Chartres,  495. 

Fort  de  Chartres  village,  see  Nouvelle 
Chartres. 

Ft.  Jefferson  built,  Ixxxvi.;  condi- 
tions at,  619 ;  attacked  by  Indians, 
xciv.;  Piggott  at,  190,  n.  i. 

Ft.  Patrick  Henry  at  Vincennes, 
Ixxvi. 

Foucher,   Ant.,   notary  at  Montreal, 

507- 
Fowler,  Alex.,  gives  De  la  Babne  letter 

of  recommendation,  xc. 
Fox  Hill,  177. 


France,  attachment  to,  539,  551,  xiv. 
Franfois,    negro   sold   to   Lecompte, 

459- 

Franklin,  Benj.,  interested  in  western 
lands,  xxix.;  recommends  De  la 
Balme,  xc. 

Franklin,  Wm.,  interested  in  western 
lands,  xxix. 

Franks  &  Co.,  trading  firm,  xxviii. 

French  settlers,  origin  of,  xvii. ;  those 
of  Kaskaskia  and  Cahokia  have 
same  origin,  xvii.,  n.  2;  the  voya- 
geurs  and  coureurs  de  hois,  xviii.; 
the  gentry,  xix. ;  discussion  of 
source  material  for  description  of, 
xxi.,  n.  I ;  not  farmers,  xxiii. ;  de- 
sire for  independence,  xxxv.,  xliv.; 
love  of,  for  France,  xlv.,  537; 
military  aid  of,  to  Clark,  xlvi., 
Ixxxviii.;  furnish  supplies,  xiv., 
Ixxv.,  Ixxvi.,  Ixxviii.,  Ixxx. ;  de- 
ceived concerning  value  of  paper 
money,  xlix.,  see  also  ibid,  n.  3; 
fail  to  receive  compensation,  cxxi., 
cxl. ;  desire  civil  government,  xlix. ; 
delivered  by  Todd  to  military, 
Ixxviii. ;  hardships  of,  Ixxxi.,  hostility 
of,  to  Virginians,  xc,  614;  threaten 
to  appeal  to  Governor,  Ixxxii. ;  emi- 
gration of,  Ixxxiii.,  cxxxi.,  et  seq., 
cli. ;  aroused  by  De  la  Balme,  xciii. ; 
expect  assistance  from  France, 
xcii. ;  hostility  of,  to  Winston, 
Ixxxvi.;  protest  against  American 
justices,  cxxxv. ;  contract  with 
Tardiveau,  cxxxviii. 

French  treaty  of  alliance,  importance 
of,  in  Illinois,  xliv. 

French  women,  poor  housekeepers, 
xxii. 

Frincs,  Jimmie,  457. 

Gaffe,  J.  Bte.,  plf.  vs.  Brady,  159, 
vs.  Harmand,  181,  201;  def.  in 
Gagne  vs.,  153,  Morel  vs.,  197; 
juror,  195. 

Gage,  Gen.,  annuls  purchases  of  land 
from  Indians,  xxx. 

Gagn6,  543,  573- 

Gagne,  Claude,  plf.  vs.  Gaffd,  153; 
mentioned,   121,  455. 

Gagne,  Ralph,  justice,  93-129;  juror, 
73,  207;  mentioned,  139;  deceased, 
273;  estate  of,  vs.  Poupar,  253; 
property  of,  361;    mentioned,  225. 


648 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


Gagnon,  Pierre,  syndic  for  affairs  of 
Michd  Bellan,  49,  54. 

Galvez,  Governor,  assists  American 
Revolutionists,  xxxiii,  ;  attacks 
southern     British    posts,    Ixxxvii. ; 

555>  557- 

GambHng,  the  popular  game,  vingt- 
et-un,  74,  n.  I. 

Gamelin,  Pierre,  intervenes  in  suit  vs. 
estate  of  Dubuque,  375 ;  plf.  vs. 
Gigon,  378. 

Garretson,  Jos.;    mentioned,  cxxii. 

Gassien,  355,  381. 

Gassien,  Pierre,  plf.  vs.  Lacource, 
425;    mentioned,   183,  423,   632. 

Gatient  (Gatien),  Pierre,  witness,  23, 
67;    mentioned,  73. 

Gaud,  Louis,  biog.  notice,  628,  n.  57; 
summons  served  on,  415;  plf.  vs. 
185,  Tabeau,  433;  def.  in  Bouvet 
vs.,  143,  Germain  vs.,  415,  Pichet 
"vs-y  345;  juror,  207;  mentioned, 
89,  225,  407,  423,  425,  593. 

Gaud,  Mde.  Louis,  143,  429. 

Genard,  Samuel,  524. 

Gentry,  description  of  the,  xix. 

George,  Robert,  biog.  notice,  478,  n. 
I ;  letter  of,  concerning  •  dishonest 
practices,  xcviii. ;  letter  of,  to  Kas- 
kaskians,  477;  makes  drafts,  cxix. ; 
mentioned,  457. 

George  III.,  265. 

Germain,  Ch.,  biog.  notice,  630,  n.  83 ; 
plf.  vs.  Dumoulin,  vs.  Gaud,  415 ; 
def.  in  Brisson  vs.,  329;  mentioned, 

419,  457>  573- 

Germain,  widow,  37,  55. 

Gerome  (Gerosme),  Fr.,  biog.  notice, 
632,  n.  98;    plf.  vs.  Biguier,   285, 

■  '  301;   def.  in  LaCroix  vs.,  165. 

Gervais  (Jervais),  Ph.,  biog.  notice, 
625,  n.  19;  justice,  51-93;  def. 
in  Turgeon  vs.,  187,  Dumoulin  vs., 
349;  juror  207;  mentioned,  121, 
161,  225,  237,  421,  423,  455,  481, 

553»  573- 
Gibault,  Father  Pierre,  priest  and 
vicar  general,  xxv. ;  character  of, 
ibid;  favorable  to  American  revo- 
lutionists, xxxvi. ;  feeling  at  time  of 
occupation  of  Kaskaskia,  xliii. 
persuades  people  of  Vincennes,  xlv. ; 
priest  at  Vincennes,  cxxxi. ;  relation 
to  other  priests,  630,  n.  78;  cession 


of  land  by,  581;  under  interdict, 
585;  goes  to  Spanish  side,  cxliii.; 
mentioned,  cxxiv.,  121. 

Gibkins,  B.  Dr.,  gives  certificate  in 
case  of  poisoning,  4,  n,  3. 

Gibson,  George,  mentioned,  xxxv. 

Gigon,  def.  in  Gamelin  vs.,  378;  men- 
tioned, 325,  373. 

Gill,  Charles,  obtained  summons,  407, 

Girardin,  Ant.,  biog.  notice,  632,  n. 
100;  one  of  the  gentry,  xx. ;  com- 
mandant at  Cahokia,  573,  at  Prairie 
du  Pont,  287;  justice  in  Clark's 
court,  6,  7;  justice,  13-51,  i97-237» 
241-289,  297-447;  church  warden, 
269;  magistrate  for  fences,  221; 
surveyor,  365 ;  suit  referred  to,  303 ; 
letter  of,  to  Sinclair,  559,  cv. ;  peti- 
tion of,  to  inhabitants,  129;  plf.  for 
AsseUn,  105,  for  Mde.  Mercier, 
121;  plf.  vs.  Asselin,  105,  vs.  Levy, 
205,  vs.  Beaulieu,  229;  def.  in 
Beaulieu  vs.,  223;  protest  against 
concessions  of  land  by,  89 ;  juror,  195, 
witness,  419 ;  takes  up  land  at  Sugar 
Loaf,  189;  surrogate  guardian, 
45;  petitions  in  regard  to  fence,  157; 
mentioned,  45,  171,  181,  325,  327, 
389,  425,  505,  531,  573,  593,  621. 

Girardin,  Auguste,  632. 

Girardin,  Michel,   199,  632. 

Girardot,  Pierre,  Sieur  de,  biog. 
notice  of,  Ivi. ;  appointed  com- 
mandant at  St.  Philippe,  Ivi.; 
elected  justice,  Ixi. ;  fate  unknown, 
cvii. 

Girault,  Jean,  biog.  notice,  20,  n.  2; 
official  interpreter,  Iviii. ;  state's 
attorney,  Ixi.;  accuses  justices  of 
neglect  of  duty,  Ixxxiv. ;  gives 
financial  aid,  li.;  appoints  Labux- 
iere  state's  attorney,  487;  men- 
tioned, 618. 

Giroux,  Jos.,  biog.  notice,  627,  n.  42; 
mentioned,  457. 

Giroux,  widow,  287. 

Godin  called  Turanjeau,  Jean,  biog. 
notice,  631,  n.  90. 

Godin,  Michel,  elected  justice  at  Kas- 
kaskia, cvii. 

Godin  called  Turanjeau,  Pierre,  biog. 
notice,  631,  n.  90;  gives  financial 
aid,  li. ;  justice  in  Clark's  court, 
4-8;      justice,     13-19;      appointed 


INDEX 


649 


captain  at  Cahokia,  Ivi. ;  mentioned, 

489. 
Godin,  widow  Pierre,  37. 
Godiniere,  Michel,  estate  of,  229. 
Golding,  widow  Henry,  plf .  vs.  Ryan, 

433-   . 
Gonneville,  see  Desjardins. 
Goodall,  Wm.,  executor  of  Kay's  will, 

523- 

Goodin,  W.,  Secretary  of  Todd,  465. 

Gouchey,  612. 

Govard  called  Baron,  457. 

Government  from  U.  S.,  expected, 
cxlvi.,  225. 

Grand  Makokite,  461. 

Grand  Marais,  465. 

Grandmont  (Granmon),  surname 
Houre,  def.  in  Reynal  vs.,  149,  Bec- 
quet  vs.,  189;   estate  of,  279. 

Grandmont,  Fr.,  biog.  notice,  628,  n. 
58 ;  def.  in  Charly  vs.,  279,  Cahorn. 
vs.,  301;    mentioned,  301,  573. 

Grandmont,  Pierre,  justice,  93-123, 
131-147;  def.  in  Cesirre  vs.,  165; 
juror,  73;  witness,  133;  men- 
tioned, 167,  169. 

Grand  Ruisseau,  settlement  of,  cxxii., 
189,  n.  2;  petition  of,  to  name 
arbitrators,  217;  commandant  of, 
appointed,  219,  cxxiii.,  cxlviii.; 
attempts  to  gain  independence,  599, 
cxlviii.;  attempt  of,  prevented, 
605;  granted  right  of  electing  jus- 
tice, 317,  cl. ;  right  to  land  at,  cxxxv- 
iii. ;    mentioned,  229,  389. 

Grant,  Jos.,  at  Cahokia,  cxlvii. 

Gratiot  (Graciot),  Ch.,  biog.  notice, 
4,  n.  2 ;  one  of  the  gentry,  xx. ; 
gives  financial  aid,  li.;  justice  in 
Clark's  court,  4-7;  justice,  13-51; 
settles  in  St.  Louis,  Ixxiii. ;  accused 
of  treachery,  559,  see  also  ibid.,  n. 
I ;  plf.  vs.  Hautier,  25 ;  def.  in 
Reynal  vs.,  27,  29,  Saucier  vs.,  61, 
Angers  vs.,  109,  in;  attorney  for 
Mde.  Groot,  403;  trading  permit 
to,  465 ;  letter  of,  to  Clark,  527,  555, 
cv. ;  letter  to,  from  Todd,  621; 
indebted  to  Kay's  estate,  523; 
mentioned,    31,    51,    53,    67,    463, 

524,  53i»  533- 
Gray,  Edward,  executor  of  Kay's  will, 

523- 
Grondine,  see  Hamelin. 


Groot,  Jacob,  plf.  vs.  Piggot,  289; 
deposition  of,  289;  def.  in  Watts 
vs.,  343;    mentioned,  191,  229. 

Groot,  Mde.,  asks  time  for  settlement 
of  husband's  estate,  403 ;  mentioned, 
289. 

Grosle,  225 ;  see  Biguier. 

Grosle,  Louis,  def.  in  LaCroix  vs., 
359;    summons  served  on,  357. 

Guards,  411. 

Guillon,  cxlvii.,  255. 

Habitants,  description  of,  xvii. 

Hait,  George,  witness,  23,  65. 

Haldimand  Collection,  account  of, 
cliii. 

Hallars,  see  Kellar. 

Hamelin  called  Grondine  (Amelin, 
Amellin),  367. 

Hamelin  called  Grondine,  Fr.,  sum- 
mons served  on,  413;   witness,  417. 

Hamelin  called  Grondine,  Ignace, 
biog.  notice,  630,  n.  76;  summons 
served  on,  413;   witness,  417. 

Hamelin  called  Grondine,  J.  Bte., 
biog.  notice,  630,  n.  76;  leader  of 
expedition  against  St.  Joseph, 
xcii. ;  estate  of,  def.  in  Boismenu 
vs.,  87,  in  LaCroix  vs.,  85,  in  Du- 
rocher  vs.,  85;   mentioned  89,  121. 

Hamelin  called  Grondine,  Jos.,  plf. 
vs.  Kertis,  279. 

Hamelin  called  Grondine,  Laurent, 
def.  in  Marchand  vs.,  247,  Motard 
vs.,  261. 

Hamilton,  Gov.,  captures  Vincennes, 
xlvi. ;  mitigation  of  imprisonment 
of,  xcvi. ;    mentioned,  529. 

Hamtramck,  Major,  commanding  at 
Vincennes,  cxli. ;   petition  to,  cxliv. 

Hanson,  see  Henson. 

Hardouin  (Ardouin),   in  Camus  vs., 

Hardouin,  Etienne,  biog.  notice,  630, 
n.  80;  def.  in  Alarie  vs.,  199,  Charly 
vs.,  239. 

Hardships  of  soldiers,  Ixxv. 

Harmand  called  Sansfagon  (Armant, 
Sanfafon),  Ant.,  biog.  notice,  269, 
n.  63;  justice,  51-93;  obtains 
summons,  389,  401 ;  summons 
served  on,  407,  411 ;  application  by, 
45 ;  plf.  vs.  Racette,  27,  vs.  Relle, 
69,  vs.  Cesirre,  loi,  vs.  Buteau, 
127,   vs.   Billet,    173,   vs.   Becquet, 


650 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


173,  vs.  Richard,  347,  vs.  Saucier, 
341,  vs.  Dumoulin,  443;  def.  in 
Racette  vs.,  23,  Trottier  vs.  63, 
Constant  vs.,  133,  Cerr6  vs.,  135, 
137,  195,  Beaulieu  vs.,  141,  Beau- 
soleil  vs.,  171,  Gaffe  vs.,  181,  201, 
Prevost  vs.,  185,  Levy  vs.,  237, 
Dubois  vs.,  241;  mortgages  pro- 
perty, 85;  property  attached,  193; 
inventory  of  property,  243;  order 
for  sale  of  property,  243;  bonds- 
man, 95 ;  released  from  bond,  105 ; 
mentioned,  87,  265,  355,  423,  432, 

481,  555>  573- 

Harmand,  Fr.  629. 

Harmand,  J.  Bte.  629. 

Harmand,  Louis,  629. 

Harmand  called  Sansfafon,  Mde.,  25. 

Harmar,  Col.,  visit  of,  to  Illinois, 
cxxxvi.;  opinion  of,  concerning 
court,  cxxxv.,  n.  2 ;  mentioned, 
cxxi. 

Hautier  called  Lacharette,  Bte.,  def. 
in  Gratiot  ■z;^., 25,  La  Croix  vs.,  ibid. 

Helene,  juror,  283. 

Henry,  Patrick,  instructions  of,  to 
Todd,  liv. ;    mentioned,  473. 

Henson,  John,  trader  in  Illinois,  xviii. ; 
def.  in  Ortis  vs.,  69,  accused  of  bad 
conduct  with  Indians,  27;  per- 
mitted to  continue  business,  29; 
mentioned,  35,  457. 

Henson,  Mde.,  def.  in  Traversy  for 
Reynal  vs.,  151;    mentioned,  29. 

Henderson,  James,  355. 

Hertel,  Rene  C,  Seigneur  de  Rou- 
ville,  507. 

Heward,  Hugh,  appointed  attorney 
for  Miami  Co.,  511;  registers 
power  of  attorney,  509;  juror,  283; 
mentioned,  283. 

Holt,  James  A.,  523. 

Honore,  455. 

Houre,  William,  335 ;  see  Grandmont. 

House-breaking  and  robbery,  385. 

Houses,  French,  description  of,  xxi., 
illustration  of,  284;  of  Amer. 
pioneers,  Ixv.,  389,  n.  i. 

Huberdeau,  gives  financial  support, 
li. 

Huberdeau,  Fr.  plf.  vs.  estate  of  Du- 
buque, 375,  vs.  Dubois,  421. 

Huberdeau,  J.  Bte.,  estate  of,  375. 

Huberdeau,  Simon,  375. 


Hubout  caUed  Deslongchamps,  Louis 
biog.  notice,  628,  n.  55. 

Huff,  Michel,  witness  to  will,  519. 

Hughes,  Th.,  elected  justice,  cxxxiv 

Huissier,  definition  of,  177,  n.  3; 
method  of  holding  auctions  by,  242, 
n.  I. 

Illinois,  relation  of,  with  East,  xxv.; 
application  for  charter  for  colony  in, 
xxix. ;  speculation  in  land  in, 
xxix. ;  attack  on,  expected,  xxxv. ; 
cession  of,  by  Virginia,  cxix. 

Illinois  County,  act  creating,  9,  lii.; 
mentioned,  473. 

Illinois  Land  Company,  established 
and  buys  land,  xxx. 

Illinois  and  Wabash  Land  companies 
plan  to  make  settlement,  Ixx. 

Illinois  River,  61,   169,  409. 

Illinois  regiment,  disbanded,  ex.; 
mentioned,  471,  529. 

Inauguration  of  courts,  Iviii. 

Indian  commissioner,  Thomas  Brady, 
130,  n.  i;  Linctot,  Ixxxix.,  n.  3; 
Dodge,  xlv.,  cxiii. 

Indians,  villages  of,  xvi. ;  relations  of, 
with  French,  ibid.,  xvii.,  n.  4; 
treaty  with,  planned  by  Morgan, 
xxxiv. ;  hostility  of,  to  Americans, 
XV. ;  trade  in  liquor  with,  regulated, 
xxxii.,  Ixviii.,  Ixix.,  cxlvii.,  73,  125, 
215,  259,  575,  607;  peace  among, 
610;  attacks  by,  Ixxxviii.,  cxlii., 
607, 

Instructions  of  Gov.  Henry  to  Todd, 
liv. 

Inundation,  203,  n.  i,  xv. 

Inventory  of  goods  of  estate  of  Chas. 
Marois,  451. 

Imprisonment  for  debt,  308,  n.  i. 

Iron  Mines,  Ft.  Jefferson  built  at, 
Ixxxvii.,  539, 

Ivont,  Fr.,  99. 

Jacquemain  called  Lajoye,  J.  Bte., 
elected  justice  of  Prairie  du  Rocher, 
cxvi. ;  mentioned,  493. 

Jacquet,  15. 

Jacquet,  Mde.  Germain,  533. 

Janette,  negress  of  Martin,  15. 

Janis,  Jos.,  lieut.  commissary,  495 ; 
public  notice  by,  ibid. 

Janis,  Nicolas,  member  of  the  gentry, 
XX.;  favorable  to  Amer.  revolu- 
tionists, xxxvi. ;   gives  financial  aid, 


INDEX 


6SI 


li. ;  appointed  captain  at  Kaskas- 
kia,  Ivi.;  justice,  Ixi.,  489;  men- 
tioned, cvii.,   103. 

Jautard,  Valentine,  land  claimed  by, 
497;   gives  power  of  attorney,  505. 

Jean  Baptiste,  negro  sold  to  Beaulieu, 

459- 

Jefferson,  Gov.,  letter  of,  advising 
cutting  down  expenses,  Ixvii. 

Jervais,  see  Gervais. 

Jesuits,  College  of,  at  Kaskaskia,  495. 

Johnson,  Matt.,  appointed  lieut.  gov. 
of  the  Illinois,  xxviii. 

Johnson,  Sir  Wm.,  interested  in  wes- 
tern lands,  xxix. ;  description  of 
French  traders  by,  xx. 

Jones,  John  Rice,  Clark's  representa- 
tive at  Kaskaskia,  cxxxiii.;  men- 
tioned, cxlii. 

Jones,  Robert,  plf.  vs.  Morris,  133. 

Joseph  Marie,  summons  served  on, 
407. 

Journal  of  McCarty,  617. 

Judik,  negress  of  James  Moore,  517. 

Jury,  trial  by,  Ixiii.,  70,  n.  2,  195, 
207;  panel  of,  71,  195,  207,  283; 
verdict  by,  196,  n.  i,  209. 

Justice,  costs  of,  Ixiii.,  163,  201,  305, 
406,  n.  2,  418. 

Justices,  at  Kaskaskia,  selfishness  of, 
Ixxxiv. ;  excellent  administration  of, 
at  Cahokia,  cxlvi. 

Justice  of  the  week,  appointment  of, 
201 ;    defined,  200.  n.  i. 

Kaire,  J.  Bte.,  629. 

Kaorn,  see  Cahorn. 

Kaskaskia  (Cascakia,  Kas),  popula- 
tion of,  xvi.,  cxliii.,  occupation  of, 
xliii.,  477;  court  at,  established  by 
Clark,  xlvii. ;  inauguration  of  court 
at,  Ivii . ;  irregularity  of  elections 
at,  Ixxxiv.;  records  of  court  of, 
Ixiii.;  troops  recalled  to,  547;  De 
la  Balme  at,  xc;  inhabitants  of, 
send  agent  to  Virginia,  cii. ;  incapac- 
ity of  inhabitants  of,  587;  old 
fort  at,  seized  by  Dodge,  cxxviii., 
ibid.,  n.  I,  569;  revival  of  court  at, 
cxxxiv. ;  conditions  at,  589,  cxlv. ; 
petition  of  people  of,  to  De  la 
Balme,  xciv.,  n.  2,  to  governor, 
civ.,  to  Congress,  cxxix.,  cxxx.,  to 
Hamtramck,  cxliv. ;  mentioned,  63, 
471,  4S7,  493.  537»  555- 


Kaskaskia  Records,   account  of,   cli. 

Kellar  (Hallars),  sickness  of,  men- 
tioned, 619;   tyranny  of,  542. 

Kennedy,  Patrick,  forms  partnership 
with  Winston,  xxviii.,  Ixxxvi.; 
talks  independence,  xxxvi.;  em- 
powered to  purchase  supplies,  477; 
placed  in  charge  of  sick,  619, 

Kentuckians  refuse  to  recognize  Illi- 
nois courts,  cxli. 

Kertis  called  Bienvenu,  Henry,  def. 
in  Hamelin  vs.,  279. 

Kertis   called  Bienvenu,  Joseph,  279. 

Kickapoos,  on  warpath,  cxlii. 

King,  George,  def.  in  Mercier  vs.,  47. 

Labadie  (Labbadie,  Labaddie)  191, 
305»  421. 

Labai,  612. 

La  Balme,  Augustin  Mottin  de,  ex- 
pedition of,  Ixxxix.,  see  also  ibid.,  n. 
3,  616,  620,  627,  n.  40;  address  of, 
to  French  xci.;  petition  to,  535; 
account  of,  by  McCarty,  618,  620; 
death   of,    xcii.;     mentioned,    civ., 

477- 

Labbe,  Late,  37.     See  Noiset. 

Labecasse,  J.  Bte.,  biog.  notice,  631, 
n.  93 ;  summons  served  on,  407 ;  def. 
in  Saucier  vs.,  275,  Savoy -y^.,  395. 

Labuxiere,  Ant.,  appointment  as 
notary,  cvi. 

Labuxiere,  Jos.,  biog.  notice,  625,  n. 
16;  state's  attorney,  cvi.,  139,  589, 
623;  commission  as  notary,  491; 
examines  witnesses  of  Winston's 
acts,  cxiv.;  deputy  clerk,  186,  n. 
i;  oath  as  clerk,  197;  clerk  of 
vestry-board,  269;  obtains  writ, 
431;  plf.  vs.  Poupar,  273;  arbitra- 
tor, 369;  juror,  195;  trustee  of 
estate  of  Dubuque,  313,  373,  377, 
429;  report  as  trustee,  393;  letter 
to  Pratte,  513,  to  Congress,  cxlvi., 
589;  mentioned,  149,  171,  283,  325, 
365,  487,  499. 

Lachance,  see  Caillot. 

Lachance,  Nicolas,  member  of  Brit- 
ish party,  xxxvi.;  absent  at  time 
of  occupation  of  Kaskaskia,  xli.; 
elected  justice,  Ixi.,  cxxxv.;  ad- 
herent of  Dodge,  cxxviii.,  cxxx.; 
mentioned,  c,  cvii. 

Lachances,  members  of  the   gentry. 


652 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


Lacoste,  Pierre,  writ  served  on,  401; 
obtains  writ,  389;  def.  in  Glamor- 
gan vs.,  409;   Dumoulin  vs.,  409. 

Lacouture,  see  Chatigny. 

Lacouture,  witness,  247;    mentioned, 

423- 

Lacource,  Ant.,  biog.  notice,  629,  n. 
64;  def.  in  Gassien  vs.,  425;  see 
Ghatigny. 

LaGroix,  plf.  vs.  Gomte,  321;  men- 
tioned, 6,  151,  217,  249,  343,  613. 

LaGroix,  Gh.,  def.  in  Martin  vs.,  77; 
mentioned,  225.    . 

LaGroix,  Haugon,  5. 

LaGroix,  Isidore,  petitions,  323;  inter- 
venes in  suit  vs.  estate  of  Dubuque, 
375 ;  attorney  for  Gamelin  vs. 
Gigon,  379;  affidavit  by,  445; 
witness,  431 ;  property  deposited 
with,  429,  435 ;  mentioned,  351,  407. 

LaGroix,  Jacques,  juror,  283;  men- 
tioned, 325. 

LaGroix,  J.  Bte.  Hubert,  biog.  notice, 
632,  n.  loi ;  one  of  the  gentry,  xx.; 
gives  financial  aid,  li.;  commis- 
sioned sheriff,  Ixii.,  51;  justice, 
51-93,  93-129,  156-167,  167-195, 
197-239,  241-296;  justice  of  the 
week,  201;  church  warden,  269; 
acts  for  church,  369;  petitions 
court,  77,  85;  plf.  vs.  Gharly,  7, 
vs.  Hautier,  25,  vs.  Saucier,  37,  vs. 
Levy,  39,  vs.  Lefevre,  83,  109,  vs. 
Levy,  99,  vs.  Martin,  iii,  vs.,  165; 
vs.  Gerosme,S.,  165 ;  def.  in  Trottier, 
vs.,  123,  139,  Sarpy  vs.,  179,  Levy 
vs.,  219;  attorney  for  Lafleur  and 
Brady  vs.  estate  of  Dubuque,  309; 
witness,  475;  executor,  121,  145, 
representing  Pentecoste,  255  ;  peti- 
tion for  trading  license,  125;  for 
protection  against  British  mer- 
chants, 575 ;  resigns  trading  license, 
213;  letter  to,  from  Pentecoste, 
621;  mentioned,  41,  79,  87,  161, 
163, 213, 229, 265, 267, 463,  481,  497, 

531.  573.  579.  593- 
LaGroix,  Mde.,  plf.  vs.  Grosli,  359; 

mentioned,  357. 
LaGroix,  Paul  H.,  195. 
LaGurie,  Jos.,  plf.  vs.  Dumay,  257. 
Lafantasie,  461. 
Lafayette,  Marquis  de,  plans  to  arouse 

the  Canadians,  Ixxxix. 


Laflamme,  heirs  of,  277. 

Laflamme,   Gh.,   147. 

Laflamme,  Mde.,  627,  n.  40;  men- 
tioned, 141,  457;   see  Mde.  Brady. 

Laflamme,  Phil.,  petitions  court,  147. 

Lafleur,  225.     See  Troge. 

Lafleur,  Dormeur,  457. 

Lafleur,  Pierre,  biog.  notice.  628,  n. 
59 ;  obtained  writ,  389 ;  v^rit  served 
on,  411 ;  plf.  vs.  estate  of  Dubuque, 
309;  def.  in  Prevost  vs.,  167,  Trot- 
tier vs.,  411,  Waddell  vs.,  445; 
house  of,  blown  up,  309;  men- 
tioned, 121,  225,  593. 

Lafont,  favorable  to  Amer.  revolu- 
tionists,  xxxvi. ;     emigrated,    cxliv. 

Laforce,  155,  157. 

Laforme,  represented  by  Arundel, 
plf.,  vs.  Clark,  365. 

Lagarceniere,  Fagot,  489. 

Lagauterie,  Pierre,  167. 

Lagrange,  Jean,  purchase  of  land  by, 
507;  sale  of  land  by,  499. 

Lagrave,  225,  457. 

Laille,  petitions,  425;  plf.  vs.  Goste, 
421;    arbitrator,   427;    mentioned, 

429,  433- 

Lajeuness,  Pierre,  biog.  notice,  625,  n. 
20. 

Lake  Manissiouri,  465. 

Lamarche,  93. 

Lamarche,  Ant.,  biog.  notice,  626,  n. 
25;  justice,  147-167;  writ  of 
seizure  and  capias  against,  393; 
plf.  vs.  Cesirre,  175;  def.  in  Wale 
vs.,  301;  witness,  117,  251;  men- 
tioned, 567,  573. 

Lamarche,  Bouvet,  def.  in  Motard, 
vs.,  203;    mentioned,  79,  167. 

Lamarche,  Louis,  627. 

La  Mars  called  Mediant,  Louis,  455. 

Lambert,  Jos.,  biog.  notice,  630,  n. 
82;  land  grant  to,  229;  mentioned, 

593.  455- 

Lambert,  Louis,  def.  in  Baron  vs., 
221,  Roch  vs.,  303. 

Land  tenure  among  French,  xxii.,  n. 
2;    ancient  rights  of,  593,  595. 

Land,  speculation  in,  xix. ;  purchases 
of,  by  land  companies,  xxx. ; 
claimed  by  Jautard,  497,  499,  by 
Pentecoste,  581 ;  right  of  priests  to 
concede,  denied,  581;  right  of 
Cahokians  to  concede,   622;    con- 


INDEX 


653 


cessions  made  by  court,  Ixxxv., 
cxxvii.,  587,  591,  in  Prairie  du 
Pont,  48,  n.  I,  153,  159,  565,  591; 
Todd's  prohibition  of  taking  up 
land,  Ixix. ;  preemption  of,  465; 
concession  of,  to  Clark,  581,  621; 
illegality  of  concessions  of,  xix., 
cxxxviii. ;  concessions  of,  by  U.  S., 
cxxxix. 

Land  company  formed,  xxx.,  also 
ibid.,  n.  i. 

Landor,  minor,  37. 

Langlois,  British  agent,  95;  justice 
in  Clark's  court,  4,  5;  mentioned, 
105,  481,  553,  612. 

Langlois,  Clem.,  51-93;    mentioned, 

9.  449'  459- 

Langlois,  Gabriel,  biog.  notice,  624,  n. 
8. 

Langlois,  Jos.,  179. 

Langlois  family,  members  of  Win- 
ston's party,  Ixxxvi. 

Langlois,  Pierre,  elected  justice,  cviii. ; 
adherent  of  Winston,  cxii.;  ap- 
pointed notary-clerk,  cxviii.;  op- 
position to  Tardiveau,  cxxxvii. ; 
emigrated,  cxliv. ;    mentioned,  Ixii. 

Langlois,  Raphael,  624. 

Language  of  French  inhabitants,  civ. 

Lapance,  625,  n.  15;  summons 
served  on,  411 ;  see  also  Roy. 

Lapance  (Lapensee),  Fr.,  justice, 
315-339;  obtains  writ,  381;  def. 
in  Fehx  vs.,  317,  Motard  vs.,  427; 
Layle  vs.,  445;  witness,  401; 
mentioned,  225,  337,  339,  361, 
399,  423,  431,  481,  483. 

Lapance,  Fr.  Xavier,  97. 

Lapance,  Janot,  def.  in  Constant  vs., 
45,  Lachance  vs.,  361,  Arundel  vs., 
443;  mentioned,  355. 

Lapance,  Mde.  Janot,  mandate  given 
to,  315;  mentioned,  15. 

Lapance,  Jean,  biog.  notice,  625,  n. 
17;    plf.  vs.  Pelletier,  91. 

Lapance,  Jos.,  biog  notice,  625,  n. 
13;  justice,  147-167,  241-289; 
surrogate  guardian,  315;  men- 
tioned, 55,  211,  225,  457,  505. 

Lapage.     See  Lepage. 

Laperche  called  St.  Jean,  Louis,  plf. 
vs.  Motard,  250. 

Laperche  called  St.  Jean,  Pierre,  biog. 
notice,  628,  n.  51;  justice,  297-447; 


juror,    207;     witness,    267;     men- 
tioned, 325,  327,  345,  455.  593- 

Lapierre,  Late,  27,  iii. 

Lapierre,  Jean  Bte.,  421,  423. 

Lapierre,  Madame,  139. 

Laplante,  Jos.,  biog.  notice,  630,  n. 

77- 
Laramee,  199. 
Larch^,    Marie    Joseph,    widow    of 

Laflamme,  147. 
Lardoise,    Jacques,    plf.    vs.    Baron, 

245. 
Largeau,  juror,  283. 
Lasoudray,    L.    pU.   vs.    Deneau    & 

Lepage,  7. 
Lasource,    Jacques,    elected    justice, 

Ixi.;   emigrated,  cxliv.;   mentioned, 

cvii.,  489. 
Last  furnisher  of  supplies,  rights  of, 

311,  n.  2. 
Laurant,  Marie,  5,  17. 
Laurins,    Jean   Bte.,  plf.  vs.  Dub^, 

Lausage,  Cadien,  petition  of,  533, 
plf.  vs.  Alarie,  55 ;  see  Fr.,  Martin. 

La  Valiniere,  Pierre  Huet  de,  vicar 
general  of  Illinois,  cxxxi. ;  his 
character,  cxxxii. ;  opposition  to 
Dodge,  ibid,  see  also  cxvii.,  n.  2; 
opposition  to  Tardiveau,  cxxxvii.; 
see  also  630,  n.  78. 

Lavertu,  Denis,  def.  in  Chevalier  vs., 

373- 
Law,    established    in    Illinois,    Ixii.; 

mentioned,  151. 
Layle,  from  Canada,  plf.  vs.  Lapanc6, 

445- 
Lead,  purchase  of,  ordered,  617. 
Leboeuf,  Louis,  biog.  notice,  629,  n. 

69. 
Leboeuf,  Ph.,  biog.  notice,  624,  n.  6. 
Lebrun,  225,  357;   see  Belcour. 
Lebrun    called  Belcour,    starts    East 

with    petition,    cxxix. ;     is    killed, 

ibid. 
Lebrun,  Louis,  biog.  notice,  627,  n. 

39;      justice,     131-147.     147-167; 

mentioned,  437,  481,  567,  573. 
Lecomte,  13,  225. 
Lecomte,  Louis,  def.  in  Beaulieu  vs., 

5,  Gaud  vs.,  185,  Billet  vs.,  259; 

bondsman,  95 ;  mentioned,  265,  573. 
Lacomte    (Lecompte)    Pierre,    biog. 

notice,  626,  n.  34. 


6S4 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


Le  Dru,  Father,  goes  to  Spanish 
settlements,  cxliii. 

Lefevre  (Lefebvre),  def.  in  LaCroix 
'vs.,  83,  Turgeon,  vs,  443;  men- 
tioned, 355,  545- 

Lefevre,  Charles,  biog.  notice,  624,  n. 
3;  def.  in  LaCroix  2/5.,  109,  Billet 
vs.,  165;  juror,  207;  witness,  475; 
mentioned,  99,  169,  225,  427,  593. 

Leger  called  Parisien,  Jos.,  369. 

Legras,  leads  reinforcements  from 
Vincennes,  xli. ;  gives  financial  aid, 
H. 

LeGuay,    notary     in    Canada,    371, 

507- 
Leith,  George,  director  of  Miami  Co., 

511- 

Lemay,  plf .  w.  Cesirre,  133;  witness, 
91. 

Lemay,  Loms,  109. 

Lemay,  Theophile,  455. 

Lember,  Jos.,  plf.  vs.  Pelletier,  171; 
def.  in  Roy  vs.,  163. 

Lemire,  Marie  Louise,  renounces 
community  of  goods,  271. 

Lepage  (Lapage,  Lepadge),  553. 

Lepage,  Amable,  witness,  471;  men- 
tioned, 455- 

Lepage,  Ant.,  def.  with  Deneau  in 
Lasondray  vs.,  7;    mentioned,  2. 

Lepage,  Jean,  481. 

Lepage,  Jos.,  biog.  notice,  625,  n. 
14;  justice,  51-93;  mentioned,  43, 
109,  137. 

Lepage,  Leon,  def.  in  Arundel  vs., 
315;  mentioned,  161,  199. 

Lepage,  Mde.,  163,  179. 

Levou,  99. 

Levasseur,  plf.  vs.  Prenouvaux,  71. 

Levasseur,  Stanicles,  elected  justice, 
ex. ;    emigrated,   cxliv. 

Levy,  Isaac,  plf.  vs.  Buteau,  113,  119, 
vs.  Belcour,  177,  vs.  Chartier,  183, 
vs.  LaCroix,  219,  vs.  Harmand, 
237,  vs.  Tabeau,  237,  vs.  Baron, 
257;  def.  in  LaCroix  vs.,  99, 
Girardin  vs.,  205 ;  trades  in  Hquor 
illegally,  157;  receives  trading 
privilege,  215;  mentioned,  cxlviii,, 
55.  343.  463,  485. 

Levy,  Pierre,  def.  in  LaCroix  vs.,  39. 

Leyba,  Fernando  de,  lieut.  gov.  at 
St.  Louis,  4,  n.  3. 

Lieutenancy,  county,  commission  of. 


to  Todd,   lii.,   to  Winston,   Ixxix,, 
to  De  Monbreun,  cxxv.,  to  Barbau, 
cxxxii. 
Lilly,   John,  executor  of  Kay's  will, 

523- 
Lintcot,  de,  deceased,  8. 
Lintcot  (de  Linctot,  Langto),  Gode- 

froy,  biog.  notice,  102,  n.  i ;   chosen 

captain,   611;    joins  De  la  Balme, 

xc. ;    plf.  vs.  Maisonville,  103;    to 

take  route  by  Illinois  River,  611; 

letter  to   G.    R.    Clark,    cv.,    553; 

mentioned,  610. 
Linn,  B.,  sent  as  spy  to  Kaskaskia, 

xxxix. 
Linn,    Wm.,    purchases    supplies    in 

New  Orleans,  xxxiii.;    assisted  by 

Bentley,  ibid. 
Lionet,  witness,  67. 
Little  Prairie,  197. 

Little  Village  (Saint  Philippe),    103. 
Livre,  definition  of,  i.,  n.  2. 
Locat,  Rene,  will  of,  467. 
Locat,    Renoch,    def.    for    sister    in 

Method  vs.,  8. 
Lonval,    summons    served    on,    411; 

petitions,  315;   mentioned,  67,  225, 

629. 
Lord,  Capt.,  British  commandant  of 

Illinois,  467. 
Lorens,  def.  in  Brady  vs.  265. 
Lorimier,  Louis,  biog.  notice,  298,  n. 

i;    plf.  vs.  Dumoulin,  299. 
Louigaud  (Louigaut),  Louis,  plf.  vs. 

Finney,  49;    def.  in  Luissier,  vs., 

41 ;  witness,  6. 
Louvieres,     Ant.,     Duchaufour     de, 

justice  at  Prairie  du  Rocher,  Ixi., 

289. 
Lussier,  Ant.,  plf.  vs.  Louigaud,  41 ; 

def.  in  Decostle  vs.,  41 ;  witness,  25. 
Lussier,  Bte.,  juror,  73. 
Luzerne,    French   minister,    plans   to 

arouse  the  Canadians,  Ixxxix. 
Mackintosh,  Angus,  director  of  Miami 

Co.,  511. 
Madame  Capitaine,  8. 
Magistrates    during    French    regime, 

Ivii. 
Mailhet,  J.  B.,  biog.  notice  of,  n.  2; 

establishes    post    at    Peoria,    xvi.; 

appointed   commandant,  Ivi.,  231; 

ordered   to    execute    a   writ,    389; 

member  of  expedition  against  St. 


INDEX 


6SS 


Joseph,  xciii.,  n.  2 ;  mentioned,  141, 
279>  297,  351,  4i7>  455- 

Maisonville,  Jos.,  def.  in  de  Linctot 
vs.,  103,  Dumay  vs.,  151;  men- 
tioned, 141,  565. 

Mallet  (Malet),  Pierre,  def.  in  Dumay 
vs.,  159. 

Manuel,  negro  sold  to  Beaulieu,  451; 
prosecuted  for  poisoning,  13;  war- 
rant for  execution,  12,  n.  i,  20,  n.  i. 

Mansen,  John  B,,  459. 

Map  of  Country  of  Illinois,  end 
vol.,  see  also  xv,  n.  i. 

Marc  la  livre,  definition  of,  52,  n.  1. 

Marchand,  Gaspard,  takes  oath  as 
huissier,  159. 

Marchand,  Louis,  plf.  vs.  Hamelin, 
247. 

Marchessaux,   183,  cxlvii. 

Marlot,  Gabriel,  substitute  heir  of 
Locat,  469. 

Marois,  Chas.,  will  of,  449 ;  inventory 
of  goods  of,  451. 

Marois,  J.,  573. 

Marramack,  619. 

Marthan,  plf.  vs.  Wills,  6. 

Martin,  summons  served  on,  411; 
mentioned,  13. 

Martin,  Fr.,  plf.  vs.  Alarie,  55;  def. 
in  Dubois  vs.,  57. 

Martin,  Pierre,  biog.  notice,  627,  n. 
36;  justice,  19-51;  writ  served  on, 
389,  413;  plf.  vs.  LaCroix,  77,  vs. 
Dubuque,  277,  vs.  Billet,  383;  def. 
in  Trottier  vs.,  79,  LaCroix  vs.,  1 1 1, 
Dubuque  vs.,  383,  Lachance  vs., 
361;  juror,  207;  land  grant  to, 
197;  mentioned,  225,  355,  381,  389, 

455'  459.  481,  53I'  573- 

Matelot,  Joseph,  79. 

Mauvaise  Terre,  247. 

McCarty,  summons  served  on,  411; 
mentioned,  251. 

McCarty,  Richard,  biog.  notice,  2, 
n.  3;  trader  in  Illinois,  xxix.; 
expects  an  attack  on  Illinois,  xxxv. ; 
gives  financial  aid,  li. ;  in  command 
at  Cahokia,  Ixxvi.;  is  tyrannical, 
Ixxxiv. ;  543,  549;  complains  of 
Todd,  Ixxiv.;  Todd's  opinion  of, 
Ixxv.;  registers  a  notice,  467; 
letter  to  his  wife,  529;  to  Todd, 
614,  xcvii.,  to  Montgomery,  615, 
to  Clark  (Journal),   618;    changes 


parties,   xcviii.;    sued  by  Bentley, 

ci.;     appointed    representative    to 

Virginia,  cii. ;  mentioned,  2,  8,  461 ; 

death  of,  ciii. 
McCaslan,  John,  511. 
McCrae,  David,  461,  523. 
McDurald,  Madame,  529. 
McElduff,     Daniel,     declaration    of, 

against  Glamorgan,  385;    letter  to 

Girardin,  386,  n.  i. 
McElduff,     John,     elected     justice, 

cxxxiv. 
Mechante,  British  Agent,  95. 
Melot,  J.  Bte.,  biog.   notice,    627,  n. 

43- 

Memorials,  of  court  to  Todd,  Ixvii.; 
of  people  concerning  military  ty- 
ranny, Ixxx. ;  to  governor,  civ.;  of 
Cahokians  to  De  la  Balme,  535 ;  of 
Kaskaskians  to  De  la  Balme,  xciv., 
n.  2;  of  Kaskaskians  to  com- 
missioners, cxx. ;  note  on,  to  Con- 
gress, cxvii.  n.  2 ;  of  Dodge  to  Cong., 
cxxix. ;  of  Kaskaskians  to  Cong., 
cxxix.,  cxxx.;  of  Cahokians  to 
Cong.,  567,  581;  of  Tardiveau  to 
Cong.,  cxxxix.;  of  Langlois,  ihid.; 
of  Kaskaskians  to  Hamtramck, 
cxliv. 

Menard  Collection,  Tardiveau  Pa- 
pers, ciii.,  n.  3,  4;   clii. 

Mercier,  455,  457. 

Mercier,  J.  Bte.,  biog.  notice,  626,  n. 
22;  obtains  writ,  389;  plf.  vs. 
King,    47;     mentioned,    481,    553, 

573- 
Mercier,  Madame,  121. 
Merleau,  Andre,  biog.  notice,  629,  n.  71 
Meryweathers,  Sergeant,  620. 
Mesere,  see  Ste.  Genevieve. 
Methot  (Method),  Bte.,  8,  457. 
Methot,  Jacques,  plf.  vs.  Locat,  8. 
Methot,  Jos.,  estate  of,  113,  121,  123. 
Methot,  Mde.,  def.  in  Methot  vs.,  8. 
Meunier,  447. 
Meyers,  at  Cahokia,  cxlvii. 
Miami,  settlement  at,  xvi. 
Miami   Indians,   on    warpath,   cxlii; 

attack  on,  by  Clark,  ex. 
Michaels,  Myer,  plf.  vs.  Troge,  281 ; 

def.  in  Dumay  vs.,  287 ;  juror,  283. 
Michillimackinac    (Michilimaquina 

Michal  Mcanoy),  intercourse  with, 

569;    merchants  from,  577;    men- 


656 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


tioned,  55,  95,  n.  i.,  181,  313,  317, 
403,  409,  523,  553. 

Michillimackinac  Co.,  at  Cohokia, 
cxxvii. ;  cxlvii. 

Milhommes,  blacksmith,  455;  auc- 
tion of  goods  of,  43. 

Military  power,  prominent  under 
Clark,  xlix. 

Milot,  455. 

Milot,  J.  B.,  biog.  notice,  630,  n.  73; 
mentioned,  225. 

Mills,  overcrowded,  321. 

Minan,  negro,  523. 

Minots,  definition  of,  46,  n.  i. 

Miro,  Gov.  de,  successful  at  Natchez, 
555;  offers  inducements  to  settlers, 
cxlii. 

Mississippi,  overflow  of,  202,  n.  i, 
569;  traders  of,  529;  mentioned; 
465,  533>  616. 

Monbreun,  Jacques  Timothe  Boucher 
Sieur  de,  biog.  notice,  xix.,  ibid,  n. 
2,  cxxiv. ;  member  of  Winston's 
party,  Ixxxvi.;  appointed  county 
lieut.,  cxviii. ;  power  and  policy  of, 
cxxv. ;  visits  Cahokia,  cxlvii. ;  failure 
of  government  of,  cxxvii.;  resigns 
and  appoints  Barbau,  cxxxii.; 
emigrated,  cxliv. ;    mentioned,  493, 

573- 

Monette,  457. 

Money,  paper,  deception  concerning, 
xlix,  n.  3;  suspected  by  French,  6; 
forgery  of,  Ixxi.;  Todd's  policy 
concerning,  Ixxi. ;  depreciation  of, 
1.,  615;  table  of  depreciation  of, 
Ixxi.,  n.  3. 

Monplesir,  Fr.,  obtained  summons, 
407. 

Montgomery,  Col.  John,  in  command 
of  Illinois,  Ixxvi. ;  writes  concerning 
lack  of  supplies,  Ixxvii.,  xcix. ; 
suggests  plan  of  assessment,  Ixxvi.; 
letter  to,  from  McCarty  615; 
tyranny  of,  Ixxx.,  Ixxxii.;  demands 
supplies  from  Cahokia,  Ixxxii., 
35  ;  land  grant  to,  Ixxxv. ;  ordered 
to  evacuate  Illinois,  Ixxxvii.;  as- 
sists in  repelling  British  at  Cahokia, 
Ixxxviii. ;  accused  of  incompetence, 
Ixxxix. ;  attitude  of^  to  De  la  Balme, 
xci.;  departs  from  Illinois,  xcv.; 
defends  his  acts,  xcv.;  right  of,  to 
make    his    drafts,    cxix.,    see    also 


ibid.,    n.    4;     testifies   concerning, 

Dodge  cviii.;  mentioned,  cxxii.,  49, 

541,  610,  612,  618. 
Montreal,  325,  501,  505,  523,  531. 
Moore,  Catherine,  wife  of  James,  517. 
Moore,  Jas.,  captain  at  Belief ontaine, 

cxxiii. ;    insolvency  of,  feared,  323; 

summoned,  323,  will  of,  349,  515; 

estate  of,   389;    mentioned,  cxxii., 

327>  341. 

Moore,  James,  son  of  James,  517. 

Moore,  John,  son  of  James,  517. 

Moore,  Henock,  son  of  James,  517. 

Moore,  Mary,  daughter  of  James,  517. 

Moore,  Milton,  son  of  James,  517. 

Moore,  William,  son  of  James,    517. 

More,  S.,  sent  as  spy  to  Kaskaskia, 
xxxix. 

Moreau,  negro  sold  to  Lecompte,  459; 
prosecuted  for  poisoning,  13. 

Morel  (Morelle),  J.  Bte.,  plf.  vs.  Gaffe, 
197,  vs.  Chatigny,  305,  with  Har- 
mand  vs.  Saucier,  341;  def.  in 
Arundel  vs.,  347,  367;  juror,  195, 
283;    mentioned,    523. 

Morgan,  George,  biog.  notice,  xxviii. ; 
member  of  firm  Baynton,  Whar- 
ton &  Morgan,  ibid.;  represents 
land  company,  xxx. ;  farming 
interests  of,  xviii.;  leaves  Illinois, 
xxxi.,  n.  I ;  Indian  commissioner  at 
Ft.  Pitt,  xxxiv.;  maintains  rela- 
tions with  Illinois,  xxxiv. ;  ignorant 
of  dark's  plans,  xxxix. ;  writes  of 
unfriendly  attitude  of  Kentuckians, 
civ. ;  seeks  land  concessions  in  Illi- 
nois, cxxxix. ;  at  New  Madrid, 
cxli.;   mentioned,  357,  385. 

Morin,  Ant.,  elected  justice,  cvii., 
cxvi.,  emigrated,  cxliv. 

Morris,  Samuel,  plf.  vs.  Worley,  363; 
def.  in  Jones  vs.,  133,  Biggs  vs., 
343;    mentioned,   355. 

Motard,  plf.  vs.  Vaudry,  177,  vs. 
Hamelin,  261,  vs.  Turgeon,  26i,vs. 
Lapance,  427;  def.  in  Laperche, 
vs.,  251;  mentioned,  125,  203,  423, 

431- 
Motard,  Jos.,    plf.   vs.   Angers,    115; 

mentioned,  483. 
Murray,  Daniel,  trader,  xxix.;    signs 

agreement  respecting  trade,  xxxii. ; 

talks   independence,    xxxvi.;     par 

ticularly  lawless,  xxxvii. ;  may  havg 


INDEX 


657 


assisted  Clark  to  take  Kaskaskia, 
xlii.;  gives  financial  aid,  xxxi.,  li. ; 
suspects  Winston,  Ixxxvi. 

Murray,  Wm.,  representative  of  Franks 
&  Co.,  xxviii.;  leaves  Illinois,  xxxi., 
n.  i;  instructs  his  brother  to  aid 
Amer.  troops,  xxxv;  presents 
memorial  to  Virginia  Assembly  for 
Illinois  and  Wabash  Land  Co.,  Ixx. 

Natchez,  555. 

Negro,  ordered  whipped,  43. 

Negroes,  trial  of,  for  poisoning,  4, 
13-21;  sale  of,  459. 

New  Madrid,  Morgan's  settlement  at, 
cxli. 

NicoUe,  19,  135,  145. 

Nicolle  (Nicol,  Nicole),  Etienne,  biog. 
notice,  624. 

Nicolles,  poisoning  of,  xlviii.,  15. 

Noizet  called  Labb^,  Frangois,  biog. 
notice,  627,  n.  37. 

Notice  to  public,  in  regard  to  destruc- 
tion of  public  property,  495;  by 
McCarty,  461;  by  court,  565,  591, 
607. 

Nouvelle  Chartres,  population  of,  xv. 

Neveux,  def.  in  Billele  vs.,  9. 

New  England,  465. 

New  Orleans,  assistance  from,  to 
Americans,  xxxiii. ;  Montgomery 
goes  to,  xcv. ;  letter  of  Monbreun  to 
governor  of,  cxxvi. ;  mentioned, 
XXXV.,  xliv.,  103,  105,  107,  235,  555. 

Neyon,  M.  de,  499. 

Officers  of  county  of  Illinois,  lii. 

OFlanigan,  Dominique,  2. 

Olf,  Michel,  365. 

Ordinance  of  Magistrates,  concerning 
property  of  debtors,  203;  con- 
cerning taking  up  land  at  Prairie  du 
Pont,  565 ;  concerning  liquor  trade, 
2i5>  577  j  concerning  brigandage, 
573;    concerning  Indians,  607. 

Ordinance  of  1787,  effect  of,  cxli. 

Ortis,  plf.  vs.  Henson,  69. 

Otway,  Tragedies  of,  512. 

Oureman,  Fr.,  630. 

Ouiatanon,  mentioned,  xvi.      * 

Pajet,  533. 

Palmier,  see  Beaulieu. 

Paneton,  Claude,  witness,  247. 

Papers  of  Old  Congress,  account  of, 
cliv. 

Papineau,  notary  in  Canada,  371. 


Pappae,  610. 

"Paradise  Lost,"  book  belonging  to 
James  Moore,  517. 

Park  William,  witness,  511. 

Parker,  Jos.,  carries  petition  to  Con- 
gress, cxxx.,  see  also  595,  n.  4; 
brings  reply  from  Congress,  cxxxii. 

Party,  in  Illinois  favorable  to  Amer. 
Revolutionists,  xxxv.,  proof  of,  ihid.y 
n.  i;  strength  of  British,  xxxvii. ; 
Amer.  party  not  in  communication 
with  Clark,  xl. ;  party  strife  at  time 
of  occupation  of  Kaskaskia,  xliv.; 
harmony  of,  at  first  election,  Ix.; 
military,  attitude  of,  toward  Todd, 
Ixxiii. ;  parties  in  Kaskaskia,  cxii.; 
French,  hostility  of,  to  Winston, 
cvii.;  Winston's,  strength  of,  cxvii; 
Dodge's,  strength  of,  cxxix. ;  French, 
seizes  power,  cxxxii.;  French,  re- 
vives court,  cxxxiv.;  French,  pro- 
tests against  Amer.  justices,  cxxxv. ; 
French,  faction  of,  cxxxvii. 

Payssa,  153,  see  also  ihid.y  n.  i. 

Pelletier  called  Antaga  (Peltier),  sum 
mons  served  on,  411;  mentioned, 
225. 

Pelletier,  Ant.,  obtains  writ,  413; 
mentioned,  573. 

Pelletier,  Felicity,  519. 

Pelletier  called  Antaga  (Peltier), 
Michel,  biog.  notice,  632,  n.  99; 
takes  oath  as  bailiff,  245;  sum- 
mons served  on,  401 ;  def.  in  Arun- 
del vs.,  441;  witness,  329;  men- 
tioned, 287,  381,  441. 

Pelletier  called  Antaga,  Pierre,  def.  in 
Lapance  vs.,  91,  Lember  vs.,  171; 
mentioned,  367. 

Peltries,  worth  of,  162,  n.  i;    261. 

Pencrasse,  Catherine,  wife  of  Isidore 
Savoy,  vs.  Labecasse,  395. 

Pencrasse,  Marin,  def.  in  Dumoulin 
vs.,  423. 

Pensacola,  capture  of,  555,  557. 

Pentecoste,  Dorsey,  def.  in  Engel  vs., 
255;  land  claimed  by,  581;  letter 
to  LaCroix,  621. 

Peoria  (Pe),  settlement  at,  xvi.;  men- 
tioned, 61,  247,  417. 

Peorian  Indian  (Pe),  deposition  of,  31 ; 
mentioned,  29. 

Pepin,  Jos.  Marie,  representing  Ta- 
beau   in   Gaud  vs.   Tabeau,   433; 


658 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


arrested  and  tried  for  conspiracy, 
437;    mentioned,   375. 

Perian,  Louis,  631. 

Perrault  (Parault,  Perault),  justice 
in  Clark's  court,  6-7;  is  a  cripple 
and  wishes  to  be  sutler,  614;  men- 
tioned, 616. 

Perrault,  J.  B.,  trader,  at  Cahokia, 
cxlvii. 

Perrault,  Michel,  sent  by  Bentley, 
ci. ;  testifies  concerning  Winston, 
cxiv. 

Petersen,  Capt.,  sent  by  Pentecoste  to 
survey  land,  622. 

Petition,  to  Clark,  i ;  of  LaCroix  for 
trading  license,  575;  of  Cadien 
Lausage,  533;  see  also  memorials. 

Petition  to  court,  form  of,  184,  n.  i. 

Peyrez,    commandant    at    St.    Louis, 

387- 

Piankeshaws  attack  villages,  cxlii. 

Piastre,  definition  of,  54,  n.  2, 

Picard,  Pierre,  elected  justice,  cviii. 

Pichet  (Pichette),  27,  455. 

Pichet,  Michel,  plf.  vs.  Gaud,  345. 

Piggott  (Pichet),  Jas.,  biog.  notice, 
190,  n.  I ;  identity  of  names 
Pichet  and  Piggott,  262;  def.  in 
Groot  vs.,  289,  Glamorgan  vs.,  363; 
dispute  with  Troge,  405;  deposi- 
tion of,  291 ;  leader  of  movement 
for  independent  court  at  Grand 
Ruisseau,  cxlix.,  599;  sentence 
against,  605;  bondsman,  321; 
mentioned,   191,  357. 

Piggott,  woman,  405. 

Pillet,  (Pilet)  Louis,  biog.  notice,  626, 
n.  24;  justice,  167-195;  plf.  vs. 
Saucier,  47,  vs.  Asselin,  131,  vs. 
Alarie,  249;  juror,  207;  men- 
tioned, 225,  457,  573. 

Pillet,  Paschal,  161. 

Placette,  Michel,  455. 

Plante,  Jos.,  plf.  vs.  Vaudr}'-,  107. 

Plasy,  see  Duplasy. 

Poirier,  Jean,  481. 

Poirier  called  Desloges,  Jos.,  biog. 
notice,  630,  n.  74;   see  Desloges. 

Pollock,  Oliver,  American  agent  at 
New  Orleans,  xxxiii.;  drafts  on, 
xlix.,  Ixxv. 

Pompee,  negro  sold  to  Sansfagon,  459 ; 
verdict  of  jury  concerning  sale  of, 
196,  n.  I. 


Population,  of  Kaskaskia,  xvi.,  cxlii. ; 
of  Cahokia,  xv.,  cxlvi.;  of  Prairie 
du  Rocher,  xv. 

Pottawattomies,  on  warpath,  cxlii. 

Pouree,  Leger  (?),  489. 

Poupar,  355. 

Poupar,  Jos.,  biog.  notice,  628,  n. 
53;  def.  in  Labuxiere  vs.,  273, 
estate  of  Gagn6  vs.,  353. 

Poupar,  Paul,  juror,  207;  mentioned, 
165,  285,  381,  573,  593,  627.^ 

Power  of  attorney,  by  Cahokians  to 
Prevost,  479;  by  Motard  to  Beau- 
lieu,  483 ;  by  Charleville  to  Pouree, 
489 ;  by  Jautard  to  Dubuque,  505 ; 
by  Askins  to  He  ward,  509;  by 
Miami  Co.  to  Heward,  511;  by 
executors  of  Kay's  will  to  Bleaksly, 

Prairie  du  Chien,  347,  367,  443. 

Prairie  du  Pont,  note  on,  48,  n.  i,  88, 
n.  I ;  taking  up  land  in,  Ixxxv.,  153, 
159,  565,  591;  rights  of  inhabitants 
in,  581;  fences  in,  157;  mentioned, 
49,  77,  171,  177,  265,  377,  395,  407. 

Prairie  du  Rocher,  population  of,  xv., 
election  of  judges  at,  Ixi.,  cxvi.; 
mentioned,  xix.,  cxxxii.,  493. 

Pratte,  merchant  at  Ste.  Genevieve, 
515;  attorney  for  Mde.  Dubuque, 
plf.  vs.  estate  of  Dubuque,  371. 

Prenouvau,  witness,  57;  mentioned, 
165,  169,  457. 

Prenouvau,  Fr.,  juror,  73. 

President  of  court  of  Kaskaskia,  ques- 
tion of,  cviii. 

Prevost,  Pierre,  plf.  vs.  Lafleur,  167, 
vs.  Harmand,  185;  registers  letter 
from  Bentley,  475,  from  George, 
477,  his  appointment  as  agent  to 
Virginia,  cii.,  479;    mentioned,  97. 

Price  of  commodities,  increase  in,  1. 

Priests,  see  Gibault,  La  Valiniere, 
Le  Dru,  St.  Pierre;  rights  of,  to 
make  land  grants,  622. 

Prison,  military,  use  of,  granted  to 
court,  Ixxxv.;  at  Cahokia,  132,  n.  i. 

Prohibition  of  exportation,  Ixxvii. 

Promissory  note,  given  by  Durand  to 
LaCroix,  213;  by  Roy  to  McCrae 
and  Co.,  461 ;  by  Robidou  to  Dor- 
ion. 

Proof  by  oath,  64,  n.  i,  161,  235,  269, 
373- 


INDEX 


659 


Property,  propres,  acquets,  conquets, 
note  on,  468,  n.  i. 

Protest  of  magistrates  to  Montgom- 
ery,  Ixxxi. 

Quebec,  Province  of,  505,  523;  men- 
tioned, 371. 

Quebec  Act,  efiFect  of,  xxv. ;  unites 
Illinois  with  Canada,  xxx. 

Quenel,  def.  in  Bissonnette  vs.,  183; 
mentioned,  15. 

Quenel,  Pierre,  justice,  147-157. 

Quorum,  8,  271. 

Racette,  457. 

Racette  (Racet),  Aug.,  plf.  vs.  Har- 
mand,  23,  vs.,  Vaudry,  99;  def.  in 
Harmand  vs.,  27. 

Racette  called  Parisien,  J.,  5,  29. 

Racette,  Mde.,  23. 

Ray,  Doctor,  joins  De  la  Balme,  620. 

Record-book  of  Kaskaskia,  622. 

Record  of  the  Court  of  the  Committee 
of  Cahokia,  2-8. 

Record  of  the  Court  of  the  District  of 
Cahokia,  23-447. 

Reeve,  John,  167. 

Reilhe,  Ant.,  plf.  vs.  Todd,  253; 
petition  of,  against  estate  of  Du- 
buque, 311;  against  LaCroix  in  case 
of  estate  of  Dubuque,  373;  attor- 
ney for  Gamelin  and  LaCroix,  plfs. 
vs.  estate  of  Dubuque,  375 ;  attor- 
ney for  Gamelin,  plf.  vs.  LaCroix, 
attorney  for  Gigon,  378;  mentioned, 

3?5.  457- 
Religion,  free  exercise  of,  accorded, 

lii. 
Religious  life  of  the  French,  xxiv. 
Relle,  Jos.,  def.  in  Harmand  vs.,  69. 
Relle,  (Real,  Riel)  Louis,  biog.  notice, 

628,  n.  52. 
Renoux,    Fr.,    def.  in    Courtois    vs.; 

mentioned,  632. 
Retrait  Lignager,  148,  n.  i,  151. 
Reynal,  plf.  vs.  Gratiot,  27,  29;    vs. 

Grandmont,  149;  vs.  Henson,  151. 
Richard,  Pierre,  def.  in  Harmand  vs., 

347-  , 

River  of  M.  Labbd,  465. 
Rivet,  253. 
Robert,  5. 
Robidou,  John,  obtains  writ  of  seizure, 

521;  same  declared  void,  425,  427; 

mentioned,  435. 
Roch,  Mde.,  plf.  vs.  Lambert,  303. 


Rocq,  Michel,  63. 

Rocheblave,  Chevalier  de,  (Philippe 
de  Rastel)  appointed  British  agent, 
xxvi. ;  life  and  character  of,  tbid. ; 
his  limited  authority,  xxvii.,  xxxv. ; 
takes  measures  to  regulate  Indian 
trade,  xxxii  ;  accusations  against, 
xxii.,  n.  2;  expects  attack  by 
Americans,  xxxviii. ;  learns  of 
Clark's  expedition,  xl.;  proof  of 
knowledge  of,  xli.,  n.  2;  plans 
resistance,  xli.;  surprised  at  time 
of  attack,  xliii.,  537;  plan  of,  to 
retake  Illinois,  ex.;  accused  by 
Bentley,  c;   mentioned,  xix. 

Rocheblave,  Jr.,  Ph.  de,  intervenes  in 
suit  vs.  estate  of  Dubuque,  375. 

Rock  River,  expedition  to,  Ixxxviii., 
540,  see  also  ibid.,  n.  i. 

Rogers,  Benjamin,  member  of  party 
seeking  independence  for  Grand 
Ruisseau,  599;  sentence  against, 
605 ;  bondsman  for  Piggott,  296,  n. 
I. 

Rogers,  Capt.,  in  command  at  Kas- 
kaskia, xcv. ;  t)rranny  of,  xcviii. ; 
threatens  to  aboHsh  court,  ci.; 
leaves  Kaskaskia,  cii. ;  letter  of, 
justifying  himself,  ibid.,  n.  2; 
second  visit  to  Kaskaskia,  cix. ; 
mentioned,  c,  617. 

Rose,  negress,  sold  to  Buteau,  459. 

Roussard,  J.,  573. 

Rouville,  Seigneur  de,  see  Hertel. 

Roux,  Pierre,  ox  of,  killed  by  sol- 
diers, 549. 

Roy,  Joseph,  461. 

Roy  called  Lapance,  Fr.  Xavier,  biog. 
notice,  625,  n.  18. 

Roy,  J.  Pierre,  biog.  notice,  625,  n. 
17;  justice,  167-195;  syndic,  145; 
in  behalf  of  minors  Methot,  121; 
plf.  vs.  Lember,  163;  def.  in  Du- 
Charme  vs.,  39;  witness,  77,  81; 
mentioned,  31,  183,  481,  573;  see 
also  Lapance. 

Ryan,   Josiah,   def.  in  Golding,  vs., 

433- 
Rumsey,   Jas.    trader,   xxix.;    leaves 

Illinois,  xxxi.,  n.  i. 
St.    Clair,    Gov.,    arrival  in   Illinois, 

cl. ;    mentioned,  cxxxi. 
St.  Cyr,  see  Deshayes  and  Dubreuil. 
St.  Cyr,  Yacinte,  registers  his  will,  473. 


66o 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


St.  Cyr,  Yacinte,  named  heir  of  Ya- 
cinte  St.  Cyr,  475. 

St.  Cyr,  Pierre,  475. 

Ste.  Genevieve,  xvii.,  299,  489,  515, 
619. 

St.  Jean,  see  Laperche. 

St.  Joseph,  post  at,  xvi. ;  attacked  by 
De  la  Bahne,  xcii. ;  attacked  by 
Cahokians  and  Spaniards,  xciii., 
see  also  ibid.,  n.  2;  mentioned,  2, 
87. 

St.  Joseph,  faubourg  of,  505. 

St.  Louis,  description  of,  xvi.;  assis- 
tance from,  to  Americans,  xxxiii. ; 
emigration  to,  Ixxxiii.,  cxxxiii., 
cxxxv. ;  De  la  Balme  in,  619;  Bri- 
tish agents  in,  cv.,  92,  n.  2,  553,  555, 
559;  mentioned,  cxxvi.,  319,  325, 
385,  409,  465,  523,  553,  561,  612. 

St.  Martin,  Pierre,  79. 

St.  Michel,  87. 

St.  Philippe,  population  of,  xv. ; 
election  of  justice  at,  Ivii.,  Ixi.,  see 
alsolvii.,  n.  4;  mentioned,  103,  133; 
see  also  Little  Village. 

St.  Pierre,  Father  Paul  de,  biog. 
notice,  630,  n.  78.  cxxxi.;  sum- 
mons served  on,  389 ;  def .  in  Savoy 
vs.,  393;  goes  to  Spanish  bank, 
cxliii.;    mentioned,   259,   269,   351, 

391- 

Sanguinette,  Ch.,  merchant  of  St. 
Louis,  53,  55,  61,  179. 

Sarpy,  plf.  vs.  LaCroix,  179;  men- 
tioned, 619. 

Saucier,  alias  of  Belcour,  4. 

Saucier,  arbitrator,  369. 

Saucier,  Fr.,  biog.  notice,  627,  n.  44; 
justice,  297-315;  president  in 
place  of  LaCroix,  505 ;  clerk, 
Ixii.,  15-197;  takes  oath  as,  51, 
95,  131,  147;  notary,  461-493; 
obtains  writ,  381,  411;  accuses 
Chatigny,  65;  petitions  court,  123; 
complaint  against,  for  disorderly 
conduct,  397;  plf.  vs.  Gratiot,  61, 
vs.  Baribaud,  267,  vs.  Chartier,  343; 
witness,  67,  iii,  181,  431;  ap- 
pointed administrator,  59;  men- 
tioned, 69,  113,  163,  167,  199, 
267,  532,  553>  593- 

Saucier,  J.  Bte.,  biog.  notice,  626,  n. 
35;  justice,  Ixii.,  19-51,  93-129, 
167-195,  297-335;    plf-  "^s-  Asselin, 


75;  def.  in  LaCroix  vs.,  37,  Pillet 
vs.,  47,  Trottier  vs.,  139;  witness, 
251,  471;  executor,  145;  men- 
tioned, 17,  73,  225,  325,  327,  337, 
339,  455,  481,  531,  553,  593. 
Saucier,  Matt.,  biog.,  notice,  627,  n. 
38;  justice,  241-289,  297-335;  plf- 
vs.  Labecasse,  275;  def.  in  Morel 
and  Sansfafon-y^.,  341 ;  witness,  483 ; 
juror,    207;    mentioned,  225,    251, 

325.  327>  339.  357>  505,  573.  593- 

Sauciers,  members  of  the  gentry,  xx. 

Savoy  called  Cadien,  Isidore,  biog. 
notice,  631,  n.  95;  obtains  sum- 
mons, 389;  plf.  vs.  St.  Pierre,  393, 
plf.  with  his  wife  vs.  Labecasse, 
395;    see  Cadien. 

Schemitz,  see  Smith. 

Seigniory  of  the  Foreign  Missions,  223. 

Senet,  notary  at  Cahokia,  449,  495. 

Sentence  against  Piggot  and  Rogers, 
605. 

Settlements,  north  of  Ohio  River, 
prohibited,  Ixix. ;  of  Americans, 
Ixxii.,  Ixxxiv. 

Shakespeare,  ist.  vol.,  book  belonging 
to  James  Moore,  517. 

Shannon,  Capt.  Wm.,  denunciation 
of  Todd  by,  Ixxii. ;  Bowman  wait- 
ing for,  614;  mentioned,  610,  611, 
613. 

Shawnees,  Clark  attacks,  Ixxxix. ; 
mentioned,  253. 

Shelby,  Capt.,  in  command  at  Vin- 
cennes,  Ixxvi. 

Sicard  (Sicart),  Pierre,  biog.  notice, 
626,  n.  33. 

Signatures,  of  justices,  212,  229,  267, 
297,  299,  313,  319,  373,  378,  381, 
387.  397'  399.  401,  419.  441,  608; 
of  petitioners,  573,  593;  of  jury,  72. 

Sills,  Samuel,  41,   77,   79. 

Sinclair,  Patrick,  letter  from  Girardin 
concerning  conditions  at  Illinois, 
559.  cv. 

Slaughter,  Major  (Colonel)  John, 
letter,  concerning  lack  of  supplies, 
xix. ;  concerning  dishonest  prac- 
tices, ibid.;    witness,  519. 

Slavery,  affected  by  ordinance  of 
1787,  cxli. 

Slaves,  Clark's  order  concerning, 
xlviii. ;  memorial  concerning  trade 
with,  Ixviii.;    sale  of.  459. 


INDEX 


66i 


Smith,  Henry,  elected  justice,  cxxxiv. ; 
testifies  concerning  Winston's  acts, 
cxv. ;  mentioned,  cxxii. 

Smith  (Schemitz),  Nicolas,  elected 
justice  at  Bellefontaine,  cxxii.; 
takes  oath  as  justice  of  Grand 
Ruisseau,  307;  justice,  329,  331, 
343>  355 ;  order  to,  365 ;  summons 
served  on,  407;  def.  in  Billet  vs., 
341 ;  mentioned,  363,  447. 

Sol,  definition  of,  3,  n.  i. 

Soldiers,  suffering  of,  xcix.,  620; 
number  of,  at  Kaskaskia,  Ixxxii., 
civ.;  withdrawn  from  Cahokia, 
Ixxxiii.,  547;  shoot  cattle  in  com- 
mons, Ixvii. ;  deserting,  615,  620; 
uniforms  for,  616;  violence  of,  537- 

551- 

Sorel,  Canada,  317. 

Spaniards,  settlements  of,  xvi.;  rule 
of,  congenial  to  French,  xvii. ; 
assistance  of,  to  Americans,  xxxiii. ; 
repel  British  from  St.  Louis,  Ixxx- 
viii.;  assist  Virginians  on  Rock 
River  expedition,  Ixxxviii. ;  attack 
of,  on  St.  Joseph,  xcii.,  xciii.,  n. 
2;  relations  to  Amer.  Illinois, 
cxxvi. ;  policy  of,  in  the  West,  cxlii. ; 
intrigues  of,  in  Cahokia,  cxlviii.; 
in  Kaskaskia,  cxli. 

Spanish  creditors,  protection  against, 
403- 

Speculators  rush  to  Illinois  to  take 
advantage  of  money  values,  1. 

Spectator,  7th  vol.,  book  belonging 
to  James  Moore,  517. 

Stamped  paper,  mentioned,  509. 

Stasis,  disease  of  city-state,  cxi. 

Stray  leaves  of  court  at  Cahokia,  2. 

Sullivan,  Capt.  John,  xcix.,  231, 
293,  407. 

Summons  to  magistrates,  413. 

Superintendents  of  Indian  affairs 
appointed  by  colonies,  xix. 

Supplies,  amount  of,  raised  by  Kas- 
kaskians,  Ixxvii. ;  fiurnished  by 
Cahokians,  610,  613;   lack  of,  xcix. 

Surgeon,  31,  309. 

Syndic,  duties  of,  xxiii. ;  of  com- 
munity, 122,  n.  2,  145;  for  alien 
creditors    of    estate    of    Dubuque, 

313- 

Tabeau,  def.  in  Gaud  vs.,  433;  men- 
tioned, 277,  285,  cxlvii. 


Tabeau,  Alexis,  biog.  notice,  629,  n. 
62;  def.  in  Bergeron  vs.,  81,  Levy 
vs.,  237;    mentioned,  225. 

Tabeau,  Pierre  Ant.,  takes  oath  of 
allegiance,  217;  debtor  to  Kay, 
523;  mentioned,  423,  427. 

Tafia,  definition  of,  13,  n.  2. 

Tardiveau,  Barth^lemi,  biog.  notice, 
cxxxvi.,  n.  2;  interpreter  for  Col- 
onel ttarmar,  cxxxvi.;  appointed 
agent  of  Americans  and  French, 
cxxxviii. ;  contract  of  Cahokians 
with,  591;  letter  from  Cahokians 
to,  595;  petitions  to  Congress, 
cxxxix;  interprets  slavery  clause, 
cxli. 

Tellier,  Armant,  sworn  as  witness,  209. 

Tellier,  Gabriel,  biog.  notice,  630,  n. 
81;    mentioned,   225. 

Tenure  of  office,  period  of,  Iviii. 

Terreine,  definition  of,  453,  n.  i. 

Thibault,  Antoine,  house  of,  at 
Prairie  du  Rocher,  345 ;  mentioned, 
423- 

Thucydides,  account  of  disease  of 
city-states,  cxi. 

Tithes,  collected  from  the  Americans, 
265,  269. 

Todd,  John,  biog.  notice  of,  liii. ; 
in  Dunmore's  war,  liv. ;  appointed 
county  lieutenant,  liii. ;  surveyor, 
Ixix. ;  organizes  militia,  Iv. ;  speech 
by,  at  inauguration  of  court, 
lix. ;  financial  policy,  Ixxi. ;  diffi- 
culties of  his  position,  Ixxiii. ;  atti- 
tude of  military  party  towards, 
Ixxiii.,  615;  buys  peltries,  Ixxviii. ; 
issues  trading  permits,  Ixviii.,  463, 
473,  491 ;  failure  of  policy  of, 
Ixxviii. ;  leaves  Illinois,  Ixxix. ; 
letter  of,  to  Gratiot,  617;  impres- 
sions of,  of  Illinois,  Ixxix.;  return 
of,  Ixxix.;  nientioned,  civ.,  cxxxiv., 
cxxxvii. ;    death  of,  ex. 

Todd,  Samuel,  def.  in  Reilhe  vs.,  253. 

Tournier,  plf.  vs.  Lapance,  319. 

Trade,  principal  routes  of,  xxvii ;  the 
Ohio  route,  ibid. ;  competition  for, 
ibid. ;  comparison  of  trade  routes, 
xxviii.,  n.  i ;  Ohio  route  of,  favored 
by  government,  xxix. ;  permits  for, 
Ixviii.,  125,  213,  215,  463,  575; 
trade  in  liquor  with  Indians,  Ixviii., 
Ixix.,  cxlvii.,  73,  157,  215,  259,  607. 


662 


ILLINOIS  HISTORICAL  COLLECTIONS 


Traders,  American,  arrive  in  the 
Illinois,  xxviii. ;  depart  from,  xxxi. ; 
prevent  resistance  to  Clark,  xli. ; 
Canadian,  compete,  xxxi.,  cxxiii., 
cxlvii. 

Transcripts  from  Cahokia  Record,  13. 

Transcripts  of  Kaskaskia  Records  pre- 
pared for  sending  to  Virginia,  ciii., 
see  also  ibid,  n.  3. 

Travercy,  takes  oath,  as  sheriff,  137, 
as  baiHff,  147;  plf.  for  Reynal  vs. 
Grandmont,  149,  vs.  Henson,  151. 

Treasury-notes,  Spanish,  377. 

Treaty  of  Paris,  xxv. 

Treaty  of  peace,  provisional,  between 
England  and  U.  S.,  ex. 

Trial  of  Americans  for  shooting  cattle, 
cvi. 

Trial  of  negroes  for  poisoning,  4,  13. 

Trigg,  Stephen,  land  grant  made  to, 
580,  n.  2.,  621. 

Trimble,  signs  as  witness,  513. 

Troge,  277,  285. 

Troge,  L.,  481. 

Troge,  Mde.,  405. 

Troge,  Pierre,  biog.  notice,  626,  n. 
23;  huissier,  197,  591;  def.  in 
Caillot  vs.,  199,  Dumoulin  vs.,  217, 
263,  Michaels  vs.,  281,  Chartran 
vs.,  287;  dispute  with  Piggot,  405; 
mentioned,  413;    see  Lafleur. 

Trottier,  Fr.,  biog.  notice,  624,  n.  2; 
one  of  the  gentry,  xx. ;  gives  finan- 
cial aid,  li.;  commandant  of  dis- 
trict of  Cahokia,  Ivi.,  cxlvi.,  47,  51, 
93,  215,  479;  resigns  office  tem- 
porarily, 145;  enforces  prohibition 
of  liquor  trade,  157;  in  charge  of 
jail,  95,  105;  takes  measures 
against  British  agents,  95;  com- 
plaint, against  Bergeron,  95,  against 
Saucier,  397;  assembles  court  to 
protect  its  privileges,  129;  justice 
in  Clark's  court,  5-8;  justice 
13-51;  judge  of  police,  533;  ob- 
tains summons,  411;  summons 
served  on,  413;  petitions,  in,  139, 
145 ;  plf.  vs.  Martin,  79,  vs.  Lafleur, 
411;  def.  in  LaCroix  and  Levy 
vs.,  39,  Dubreuil  z*^.,  259;  witness, 
415,  471,  475;  bondsman,  73; 
ox  of,  killed  by  soldiers,  549 ;  men- 
tioned, xxxvi.,  63,  99,  179,  207,  225, 
379,  457>  459.  481,  531,  553.  593- 


Trottier,  Jean  Marie,  85,  99. 

Trottier,  Joseph,  459. 

Trottier,  Louis,  biog.  notice,  629,  n. 
70;  justice,  241-256;  plf.  vs. 
Harmand,  63,  vs.  LaCroix,  123, 
139,  vs.  Saucier,  139;  mentioned, 
225,  457- 

Trudeau,  251. 

Turanjeau,  Lieut,  457. 

Turanjeau.     See  Godin. 

Turgeon,  151. 

Turgeon,  Francois,  plf.  vs.  Lefevre, 
443;   def.  in  Motard  vs.,  261. 

Turgeon,  Nicolas,  biog.  notice,  626, 
n.  21;   plf.  vs.  Gervais,  187. 

Tusson,  J.  Bte.,  plf.  vs.  Bayles,  239. 

Tutelle  dative,  note  on,  26,  n.  i. 

Ulim,  Marie  Louise,  widow  of  J.  Bte. 
Desgagne,  petitions,  27. 

United  States,  government  from,  ex- 
pected, 224,  n.  I.,  227,  229;  men- 
tioned, 537. 

Vacation,  definition  of,  201. 

Vadeboncoeur,  settlement  of  estate  of 
late,  45. 

Vadeboncoeur,  Louis,  plf.  vs.  Baron, 
269. 

Vagabonds,  The,  by  Savage,  book 
belonging  to  James  Moore,  517. 

Valle,  hunter,  455. 

Valle,  Chas.,  457. 

Valle,  Fr.,  387. 

Vasseur,  Jacques,  87. 

Vaudry,  225,  353. 

Vaudry,  Jos.,  biog.  notice,  631,  n. 
92 ;  def.  in  Racette  vs.,  99,  Plante 
vs.,  107,  Motard  ■y^.,  177,  Baron  i;5., 
221,  249,  Arundel  vs.,  307. 

Verronneau,  Denis,  plf.  vs.  Brisson, 

357- 

Vestry-board,  oath  by  members  of, 
269;    mentioned,  xxiv.,  249. 

Vigo,  gives  financial  support,  li. 

Villages,  French,  description  of,  xxi. 

Villiers,  Sargent,  620. 

Vincennes,  description  of,  xvi.;  mili- 
tia from,  sent  to  assist  Rocheblave, 
xli.;  people  of,  persuaded  to  join 
Amer.  cause,  xlv. ;  court  estab- 
lished by  Clark  at,  xlvii. ;  court 
established  by  Todd  at,  Ixii. ;  irreg- 
ularities of  court  of,  Ixiii.,  Ixxxiv. ; 
court  record  of,  destroyed,  Ixiii.; 
evacuated,  Ixxxvii. ;    De  la  Balme 


INDEX 


663 


at,  xc. ;  occupied  by  Clark  ,  cxxxiii. ; 
mentioned,  xvi.,  103,  477,  622. 
Virginia,  right  of,  to  Northwest,  lii.; 
treasury  of,  xlix.,  Ixxv.,  Ixxviii., 
547;  appeals  to,  Ixxxiii.  cii.,  ciii. 
cxvii.,  cxix.;  messenger  to,  251, 
479;  mentioned,  265,  471,  481,  487, 

533- 
Virgi  lia  State  Library,  Collection  of, 

account  of,  cliv. 
Viviat  family,  members  of  the  gentry, 

XX. 

Viviat,  Louis,  independent  religious 
opinion  of,  xxiv. ;  represents  Wa- 
bash Land  Co.,  xxx.;  member  of 
British  party,  xxxvii.;  death  of, 
xli. 

Voyageurs,  description  of,  xviii. 

Voiture,  definition  of,  168,  n.  i. 

Wabash  Indians,  on  warpath,  cxlii. 

Wabash  Land  Co.,  established  and 
buys  land,  xxx. 

Wabash  River,  villages  on,  xvi.; 
trade  route  by  the,  ibid. 

Waddell,  David,  summons  served 
on,  405 ;  obtains  writ,  389 ;  plf .  vs. 
Lafleur,  445;   mentioned,  357. 

Wale,  plf.  vs.  Gervais,  301,  vs.  La- 
marche,  301. 

Warrant  for  hanging  of  Manuel,  20, 
n.  I. 

Washington,  George,  interested  in 
western  lands,  xxix. ;  plans  to 
arouse  the  Canadians,  Ixxxix. 

Watts,  James,  plf.  vs.  Groot,  343. 

Watts,  Rob.,  biog.  notice  of,  188,  n. 
i;  commandant  at  Grand  Ruis- 
seau,  cxxiii.,  295,  597;  opposes 
effort  for  independence,  cxlix. ; 
address  by,  597;  receives  land 
grant,  189;   mentioned,  cxxii.,  573. 

Wells  (Wills),  def.  in  Marthan  vs.,  6. 

West,  Isaac,  deposition  of,  293; 
mentioned,  281. 

Wharton,  Samuel,  interested  in  wes- 


tern lands,  xxix.;  member  of  trad- 
ing firm,  xxviii. 

Williams,  Col.,  mentioned,  cliii. 

Williams,  Major  John,  biog.  notice, 
62,  n.  I ;  in  command  at  Kaskaskia, 
Ixxvi. ;  to  give  military  assistance, 
63;  testifies  concerning  Winston, 
cxv.;  mentioned,  cv.,  543,  553, 
557,  618. 

Williams,  Thomas  Jarret,  horse- 
whipped Dodge,  619. 

Willing,  expedition  of,  xl. 

Wills,  registry  of,  Locat's,  467;  St. 
Cyr's,  473;  Moore's,  515. 

Wilson,  writ  against,  413. 

Wine,  Thomas,  bondsman  for  Piggot, 
296,  n.  I. 

Winston,  Mrs.,  appeals  to  court,  cxiv. 

Winston,  Richard,  sketch  of,  Ixxxv.; 
in  partnership  with  Kennedy,  xviii. ; 
talks  independence,  xxxvi.;  col- 
lects supplies  for  Clark,  xliii. ; 
gives  financial  aid,  li. ;  appointed 
commandant  at  Kaskaskia,  Ivi.; 
appointed  sheriff,  Ixi.,  20,  n.  i ; 
appointed  deputy  county  lieutenant, 
Ixxix. ;  hostility  of  French  to, 
Ixxxvi.,  cvii. ;  relation  to  the  mili- 
tary, Ixxxvii. ;  party  of,  cxii.,  cxvii. ; 
supports  French,  ciii.;  accuses 
Virginia  officers,  xcviii.,  cxii.;  ar- 
rested by  Dodge,  cxiv.;  protest 
of,  cxv.;  dispute  referred  to,  129; 
authorizes  commissions,  489,  491 ; 
policy  of,  defeated  at  election,  cviii., 
cxvi. ;  abolishes  court  of  Kaskas- 
kia, cxvii.;  appointed  representa- 
tive to  Virginia,  cxvii.;  death  of, 
cxx. 

Wood,  Ch.,  def.  in  Glamorgan  vs., 
331 ;  land  grant  to,  229. 

Worley,  Joseph,  def.  in  Morris  vs., 
363;    bondsman,  321;    mentioned 

327,  365- 
Wouel,  juror,  283. 


#•> 


P  Illinois.     State  Historical 

536  Library,  Springfield 
125  Collections 

V.  2 


PLEASE  DO  NOT  REMOVE 
CARDS  OR  SLIPS  FROM  THIS  POCKET 

UNIVERSITY  OF  TORONTO  LIBRARY