Skip to main content

Full text of "Communist threat to the United States through the Caribbean. Hearings before the Subcommittee to Investigate the Administration of the Internal Security Act and Other Internal Security Laws of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Eighty-sixth Congress, first session .."

See other formats


^ 


c/V? 


0  *9335.4A334 


(±1 


I- 


iq 


^ 


3^ 


COMMUNIST  THREAT  TO  THE  UNITED  STATES 
THROUGH  THE  CARIBBEAN 


HEARINGS 

BEFORE}  THB 

SUBCOMMITTEE  TO  INVESTIGATE  THE 

ADMINISTRATION  OF  THE  INTERNAL  SECURITY 

ACT  AND  OTHER  INTERNAL  SECURITY  LAWS 

OF  THB 

COMMITTEE  ON  THE  JUDICIARY 
miTEI^  STATES  SENATE 

EIGHTY-SIXTH  CONGRESS 

FIRST  SESSION 


PART  2 

TESTIMONY  OF  JOSEPH  ZACK  KORNFEDEPw 

SUPPLEMENTED  BY  A  STAFF  STUDY 
COMMUNIST  ANTI-AMERICAN  RIOTS 


AUGUST  13,  1959 


Printed  for  the  use  of  the  Comiqittee  on  the  Judiciary 


6649E   O  -  61 


UNITED  STATES 

GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  OFFICE 

WASHINGTON  :   1959 


.  COMMITTEE  ON  THE  JUDICIARY 

JAMES  O.  EASTLAND,  Mississippi,  Chairman 

ESTES  KEFAUVER^ Tennessee  ALEXANDER  WILEY, 'Wisconsin"' 

OLIN  D.  JOHNSTON,  South  Carolina  WILLLAM  LANGER,  North  Dalcota 

THOMAS  C.  HENNWGS,  Jr.,  Missouri  EVERETT  McKINLEY  DIRKSEN.'lUinols 

JOHN  L.  McCLELLAN,  Arkansas  ROMAN  L.  HRUSKA,  Nebraska 

JOSEPH  C.  O'MAHONEY,  Wyoming  KENNETH  B.  KEATING,  New  York 
SAM  J.  ERVIN,  JR.,  North  Carolina 
JOHN  A.  CARROLL,  Colorado 
THOMAS  J.  DODD,  Connecticut 
PHILIP  A.  HART,  Michigan 


Subcommittee  To  Investigate  the  Administration  of  the  Internal  Security 
Act  and  Other  Internal  Security  Laws 

JAMES  O,  EASTLAND,  Mississippi,  Chairman 
THOMAS  J.  DODD,  Connecticut,  Vice  ChalTman 
OLIN  D.  JOHNSTON,  South  Carolina  ROMAN  L.  HRUSKA,  Nebraska 

JOHN  L.  McCLELLAN,  Arkansas  EVERETT  McKINLEY  DIRKSEN,  Illlnola 

SAM  J.  ERVIN,  Je.,  North  Carolina  KENNETH  B.  KEATING,  New  York 

J.  Q.  SouBwiNE,  Countel 
Bkmjahin  Mandel,  Director  of  BettarcS 
II 


CONTENTS 


Testimony  of —  ^a8« 

Joseph  Zack  Kornfeder,  former  Comintern  agent  in  Latin  America 33 

Appendix:   Communist  Anti-American  Riots 115 

xn 


COMMUNIST  THREAT  TO  THE  UNITED  STATES 
THROUGH  THE  CARIBBEAN 


AUGUST  13,  1950 

United  States  Senate, 
Subcommittee  To  Investigate  the 
Administration  of  the  Internal  Security  Act 

AND  Other  Internal  Security  Laws,  of  the 

Committee  on  the  Judiciary, 

Washington,  D.C. 

The  subcommittee  met,  pm-suant  to  call,  at  10 :35  a.m.,  in  room'^2228, 
New  Senate  OflBce  Building,  Senator  Kenneth  B.  Keating  presiding. 

Also  present:  J.  G.  Sourwine,  chief  counsel;  Benjamin  Mandel, 
director  of  research;  Frank  W.  Schroeder,  chief  investigator. 

Senator  Keating.  The  subcommittee  will  come  to  order. 

The  fu-st  witness  this  morning  is  Mr.  Joseph  Komfeder. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Will  you  come  forward,  Mr.  Komfeder,  and  be 
sworn. 

Senator  Keating.  Mr.  Kornfeder,  would  you  raise  your  right  hand. 

Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  evidence  you  give  in  this  proceeding 
will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help 
you  God? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  I  do. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Be  seated,  Mr.  Kornfeder. 

Senator  Keating.  Counsel,  would  you  proceed. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Thank  you,  Mr.  Chairman. 

TESTIMONY  OF  JOSEPH  ZACK  KORNFEDER 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Will  you  give  us  your  full  name,  sir. 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Aly  name  is  Joseph  Zack  Kornfeder, 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Of  what  country  are  you  a  citizen? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  United  States. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  You  live  in  the  United  States  at  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  I  do. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  What  is  your  national  origin,  Mr.  Komfeder? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  I  was  bom  in  what  was  formerly  Austria-Hungary. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Have  you  been  a  student  of  the  Communist  con- 
spiracy, Mr.  Komfeder? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  I  did  not  hear. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Have  you  been  a  student  of  the  world  Communist 
conspiracy? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Oh,  yes. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Have  you,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  been  at  one  time  a 
part  of  that  conspiracy? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  I  was. 

88 


34  COMMinsriST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Where  did  you  operate  as  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist conspiracy? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  I  was  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  i 
of  the  United  Slates  of  America,  and  for  a  period  of  about  3  years  I 
was  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  Soviet  Union ;  and  I 
was,  for  2  years,  in  South  America.  I  was  one  of  the  principal  foun- 
ders of  the  Communist  Party  of  Colombia  and  of  Venezuela.  In 
fact,  I  was  sent  down  there  for  the  purpose  of  organizing  these  two 
Communist  Parties. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Mr.  Chairman,  before  I  proceed  with  the  further 
questioning  of  this  witness,  I  would  like  to  offer  for  the  record  at  this 
time  an  excerpt  from  the  book  "Look  Southward,  Uncle,"  by  Edward 
Tomlinson.  This  excerpt  consists  of  a  statement  of  the  significance 
of  Latin  America  to  the  internal  security  of  the  United  States.  \ 

Senator  Keating.  That  may  be  made  a  part  of  the  record. 

(The  excerpt  referred  to  follows:) 

What  Latin  America  Means  to  Us 
our  last  line  op  defense 

Our  stake  in  these  countries  is  more  than  economic.     Xt  is  also  military  and 
political.     With  these  20  republics  solidly  on  our  side,  we  could  be  almost  in- 
vincible in  time  of  war,  even  if  they  did  not  supply  a  single  soldier  to  support  us 
in  battle.     Our  access  to  the  Panama  Canal  would  be  a  first  strategic  considera 
tion.     With  Cuba,  Haiti,  the  Dominican  Republic,  Puerto  Rico,  and  Venezuela  as  I 
bases  from  which  to  operate  planes  and  submarine  chasers,  we  could,  as  we  did  in 
the  last  war,  meet  an  undersea  offensive  from  the  Atlantic.     We  could  protect  the  ' 
bauxite  mines,  the  iron  mines,  and  the  oil  fields  of  eastern  Venezuela  and  the 
Guianas. 

When  you  study  the  geography  of  Central  America  and  western  South  America, 
you  find  that  Panama  and  the  canal  are  in  the  tip  of  a  triangle.  The  Central 
American  countries  stretch  northwestward  at  an  angle  of  40°,  while  the  coast  of 
Ecuador  and  Peru  bulge  out  westward.  Eight  hundred  miles  out  at  sea  in  this 
triangle  are  the  Gald,pagos  Islands,  flanking  the  Pacific  sea  lanes  to  the  Isthmian 
Waterway.  In  the  last  war  our  bombers  and  fighters  operated  from  bases  in  all 
Central  American  countries,  on  the  Galapagos,  and  on  the  bulge  of  Ecuador  and 
Peru.  We  shall  need  access  to  these  again,  for  guarding  the  waterway  itself  and 
forprotecting  ships  as  they  approach  or  leave  the  canal. 

The  great  nump  of  Brazil  that  juts  so  far  out  into  the  South  Atlantic  is  2,700 
miles  farther  eastward  than  New  York.  It  is  only  1,400  miles  from  the  western 
bulge  of  Africa  at  Dakar  and  is  nearer  to  the  Mediterranean  area  and  the  bases 
of  Russian  bombers  in  Rumania  than  is  the  mainland  of  the  United  States.  We 
would  need  the  cooperation  of  Brazil  in  manning  the  naval  and  air  bases  at  ' 
Fortaleza  and  Recite,  Brazil,  just  as  we  did  in  World  War  II,  to  protect  shipping 
lanes  in  the  South  Atlantic  and  to  prevent  the  bombing  and  destruction  of  the 
great  new  manganese  mines  in  the  Brazilian  northland. 

In  January  1957,  after  much  serious  negotiation,  we  effected  an  agreement  with  ' 
Brazil  by  which  we  erected  a  guided-missile  tracking  or  control  station  on  the 
bleak  isle  of  Fernando  de  Noronha,  125  miles  off  the  mainland.    This  installation   < 
also  would  be  effective  in  detecting  preparations  by  an  enemy  for  launching   ; 
missiles  from  across  the  Atlantic. 

Unfortunately,  pressure  on  the  Brazilian  Government  by  nationalistic  elements   ' 
in  that  county,  in  the  military  forces  and  in  Congress,  prevented  a  long-term  pact. 
Under  the  initial  agreement,  our  own  technicians  will  be  permitted  to  remain  on 
the  island  only  5  years,  unless  the  period  is  extended  later.    At  the  end  of  that  time 
all  the  installations  and  equipment  are  to  be  turned  over  to  the  Brazilians. 

There  is  a  strong  possibility  that  research  in  the  guided-missile  field  has  made 
the  present  equipment  and  techniques  completely  out  of  date.  New  discoveries 
might  have  made  it  possible  to  guide  long-range  missiles  from  airplanes  or  long- 
distance radar.    But  this  remains  to  be  seen. 

"In  the  next  war,"  a  top  military  authority  told  me  recently,  "we  may  expect 
our  enemies  to  attack  not  only  the  United  States,  but  the  great  mineral  and   j 
metallurgical  mining  centers  in  Canada  and  the  nations  to  the  south  of  us.    These    . 
will  be  among  their  chief  objectives.    The  enemy  knows  that,  without  immense   ' 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  35 

quantities  of  these  strategic  products  of  Latin  America  and  our  neighbor  to  the 
north,  we  would  have  the  greatest  difficulty  building  the  machines  and  gadgets 
with  which  to  defend  ourselves,  much  less  to  fight  a  great  oflfensive.  "Latin  Amer- 
ica," he  declared,  "is  our  last  line  of  defense." 

Recently  the  U.S.  Senate  Committee  on  Interior  and  Insular  Affairs,  after 
10  months  of  hearings  and  investigation,  reported  that  "the  Western  Hemisphere 
can  be  defended  and  will  be  the  only  dependable  source  to  the  United  States  of 
critical  materials  in  the  event  of  an  all-out  war."  The  report  went  on  to  say, 
"The  expanded  range  of  air  power  and  guided  missiles  makes  clear  the  danger 
of  chaining  our  war  machine  exclusively  to  sources  of  strategic  and  critical  ma- 
terials located  in  the  Eastern  Hemisphere,  in  Europe,  Africa,  or  Asia;  and  makes 
it  mandatory  that  'going-concern  production  sources'  be  developed  in  South 
America." 

Next  to  Canada,  these  countries  and  their  teeming  millions  will  be  for  all  time 
our  closest  neighbors.  Their  future  is  inextricably  tied  to  ours,  and  ours  to 
theirs.  It  is  impossible  for  what  takes  place  in  one  not  to  affect  the  other  directly 
or  indirectly.  We  might  and  probably  could  get  along  if  Europe — France,  Italy, 
even  Britain — should  be  overrun  by  the  Communists.  We  would  still  have  a 
broad  ocean  between  us.  But  Latin  America  joins  on  to  the  United  States. 
Any  attack  on  these  Republics  would  be  an  attack  on  us,  even  without  considering 
the  various  inter-American  treaties  that  obligate  us  to  make  common  cause 
with  them,  and  them  with  us. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Mr.  Kornfeder,  you  have  broken  with  the  Com- 
munist Party? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  I  have. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  When  was  that? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  I  broke  with  them  in  1934. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Since  that  time  you  have  been  anti-Communist? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  I  have. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Now,  were  you  prepared  especially  in  any  way  for 
your  job  of  going  to  South  America  to  help  organize  the  Communist 
rarties  in  the  countries  there? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Yes.  I,  for  3  years,  was  in  the  Lenin  College 
in  Moscow,  which  is  a  leadership  training  college. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  You  spent  3  years  at  the  Lenin  school? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  I  did. 

Mr.  Sour  WINE.  What  were  you  taught  there  about  the  necessity 
of  defeating  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  WeU,  the  United  States  was  considered  the 
principal  block  to  the  conquest  of  the  globe  by  the  Communists, 
and  we  were  taught  that  capitahsm  is  not  going  to  fall  until  the 
United  States  falls. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Until  the  United  States  falls? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  That's  right.  And,  therefore,  the  defeat  of  the 
United  States  was  the  principal  ultimate  objective  of  everything  that 
was  done. 

Mr.  Sour  WINE.  You  say  the  principal  ultimate  objective;  you  mean 
of  all  Soviet  strategy? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  That's  right. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Does  this  remain  so  today? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  It  certainly  does. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Has  there  been  any  change  of  emphasis  in  this 
regard  since  you  attended  the  Lenin  school? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Oh,  yes;  there  has  been  a  change. 

Mr.  Sour 'VINE.  Explain  that. 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  Moscow  has  a  system  of  what  one  may  call 
immediate  priorities  and  ultimate  objectives.  The  immediate  priority 
in  the  thirties  and  forties  was  China  and  Germany.  At  the  present 
time  the  priority  is  on  the  United  States;  they  are  concentrating  in 


36  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

every  respect  upon  the  United  States.     And,  South  America  is,  as  it 
were,  one  of  the  ways  of  concentrating  upon  the  United  States. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  When  you  went  to  the  Lenin  school  to  prepare  for 
your  job  of  going  to  South  America  to  organize  Communist  Parties 
there,  were  you  given  specific  training  for  your  duties  in  Latin  America, 
which  was  not  given  to  other  Communist  agents  who  were  to  be  sent 
elsewhere? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Yes.  There  was  one  part  of  the  training  that 
applied  only  to  South  America. 

Mr.  SoTTRwiNE.  What  was  that  part? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDBR.  That  was  a  3-week  intensive  briefing  b}'^  Red 
army  officers  who  specialized  in  guerrilla  warfare. 

Mr,  SouRWiNE.  Guenilla  warfare.  Was  this  given  to  others  who 
were  to  go  to  South  American  countries  too? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right.  South  America  was  considered  the 
proper  terrain  for  this  type  of  warfare,  both  topographically  and 
politically. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Mr.  Kornfodor,  what  is  the  organization  of  the 
Communist  Party  with  regard  to  South  America? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Woll,  the  Literratioual  Communist  Party,  which 
is  run  from  Moscow,  has  two  bureaus,  field  bureaus,  which  coordinate 
the  activities  of  tlic  Communist  Parties  on  the  Latin  American  Conti- 
nent. One  was  operating  out  of  Montevideo  and  the  other  originally 
was  operating  from  New  York. 

Tile  New  York  bureau  had  jurisdiction  over  all  Communist  Parties 
down  to  and  including  tlie  Panama  Canal,  and  the  other  bureau  bad 
jurisdiction  over  the  parties  of  the  continent  proper,  down  to  Aigen- 
tiua. 

These  two  bureaus  were  tlie  ones  that  were  in  immediate  ciiarge  of 
all  of  the  operations  of  the  various  Communist  Parties  within  their 
jurisdiction. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  What  were  those  two  biu'eaus  called? 

Mr.  KouNFEDER.  Tiie  bureau  in  Montevideo  was  the  Latin  Ameri- 
can Bureau,  and  the  bureau  in  the  Caribbean  was  called  the  Caribbean 
Bureau. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  That  was  the  one  in  New  York? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That  was  the  one  in  New  York. 

Senator  Keating.  May  I  interrupt  there. 

Ai'e  you  speaking  now  of  some  prior  time  or  as  of  todaj'^? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Oh,  I  am  certain  these  bureaus  are  still  there; 
they  couldn't  operate  without  tliem. 

Senator  Keating.  In  other  words,  it  is  your  opinion  that  there  is 
still  this  division,  and  the  two  bureaus  still  exist  at  the  present? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right,  Senator. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  To  summarize,  then,  up  to  the  present  time  you 
are  testifying  that  Moscow  iias  maintained  for  over  20  years,  and 
maintains  today,  an  organization  to  direct  and  supervise  Communist 
activities  in  Latin  America; 

That  the  long-range  ultimate  objective  of  this  always  has  been  the 
overthrow  or  collapse  of  the  United  States; 

And  that  in  recent  years,  I  think  you  said  since  World  War  II,  the 
priority  has  been  given  to  this  thrust  at  the  United  States? 


COMMUNIST   THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  37 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Now,  what  part  did  you  have  in  this  Communist 
organization,  with  respect  to  Latin  America? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  before  I  went  to  South  America  from 
Moscov/,  I  Avas  a  member  for  about  9  months,  ex  officio,  of  the  Latin 
American  Secretariat  in  Moscow.  This  is  a  secretariat  that  coordi- 
nates the  activities  of  the  two  field  bm*eaus  from  Moscow  down.  It 
is  the  one  that  discusses  strategy,  the  field  bm'eau  discusses  and 
decides  mostly  on  tactics,  the  major  strategy  being  decided  in  Moscow, 
and  the  instructions  are  channeled  through  the  Latin  American 
Secretariat. 

On  the  Moscow  level,  all  the  operations  in  Latin  America  are 
coordinated  through  the  Latin  American  Secretariat. 

Then,  later,  when  I  returned  from  South  America,  I  was  made  a 
member  of  the  Caribbean  Bureau,  due  to  my  experience  down  there. 
The  chairman  of  the  bureau  at  that  time  was  Alexander  Bittelman. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Bittelman? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

And,  the  chairman  of  the  bureau  down  in  Montevideo,  a  Kussian, 
a  very  able  individual  by  the  name  of  Guralski. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Guralski? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

Senator  Keating,  Was  Bittelman  an  American  citizen? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  I  thought  he  was,  but  later  on  it  was  shown 
he  wasn't. 

Senator  Keating.  He  was  in  charge  of  the  New  York  office,  you 
mean? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

Senator  Keating.  Do  you  know  of  his  present  whereabouts? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  He  is  still  in  the  United  States. 

Senator  Keating.  Is  he  in  New  York  now? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  To  the  best  of  m^y  belief,  he  is. 

Senator  Keating.  Is  he  still  engaged  in  the  same  activities? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That,  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Do  you  know  who  is  the  head  of  the  Caribbean 
Bureau  at  the  present  time? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  The  present  head,  no;  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Do  you  know  who  is  the  present  head  of  the  Latin 
American  Bureau? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  You  mean  the  one  in  Montevideo? 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Montevideo. 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  No. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Did  Palmiro  Togliatti  have  anything  to  do  with 
the  Communist  activities  in  the  Caribbean? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Togliatti  was  the  secretary  at  the  Latin  American 
Secretariat  in  Moscow. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  At  the  time  you  were  there? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  That's  right. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  We  have  a  situation  in  which  the  secretary  of 
the  Latin  American  Secretariat  is  not  a  Latin  American,  but  Italian; 
the  head  of  the  Caribbean  Bureau  is  not  Latin  American  but  a  North 
American;  and  the  head  of  the  bureau  for  the  continent  is  not  a 


38  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN     - 

Latin  American  but  a  Russian.  Is  this  typical  of  the  operation, 
that  people  foreign  to  the  country  where  the  operation  is  being 
concentrated  always  head  up  the  operation? 

Mr.  KouNFEDEU.  Oh,  yes;  dcfitiitoly.  Moscow  utilizes  its  trained 
personnel  wiierever  it  considers  it  necessary,  irrespective  of  any 
nationality. 

Air.  SouRWiNE.  Is  there  any  Communist  policy  to  avoid  having 
a  continental  movement  or  a  subcontinental  division  or  bureau 
headed  by  a  native  of  that  particular  area? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Yes.  That  is  one  of  the  rules;  the  Moscow 
representative  cannot  be  a  native  of  the  country  in  which  lie  is  sent 
to  operate. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Is  that  to  protect  him  against  the  dangers  of 
nationalism  and  chauvinism? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  He  may  be  infected  by  friendships — well,  by 
other  considerations,  if  he  was  a  native  of  the  same  country. 

Senator  Keating.  In  other  words,  Bittelman  was  actually  a  native 
of  what  country? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Bittelman  was  a  native  of  Russia,  but  he  had 
lived  in  the  United  States  for  a  long,  long  time. 

Senator  Keating.  But  you  now  know  that  he  had  never  become 
an  American  citizen? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  That's  right,  Senator. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  You  have  told  us  of  the  jurisdiction  of  these  two 
bureaus. 

Now,  what  can  you  tell  us  about  their  functions,  their  financing, 
their  personnel? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  the  financing,  of  course,  is  done  entirely 
from  Moscow,  and  they  have  an  operational  budget,  usually  decided 
1  year  ahead,  and  in  which  the  amount  is  figured  on  the  basis  of  the 
minimum  and  a  maximum. 

All  the  operations  of  these  bureaus  are  paid  by  Moscow,  including 
all  the  agents  they  utilize,  or  any  publications  that  they  may  sub- 
sidize— that  is,  everything  that  has  to  do  with  these  two  bureaus  is 
paid  from  Moscow,  not  from  the  local  organizations. 

Mr.  Souravine.  At  the  time  you  were  with  the  Caribbean  Bureau, 
what  was  the  size  of  the  personnel  there? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  there  were  only  seven  persons  on  it. 

Mr.  Souravine.  Do  you  have  any  reason  to  believe  it  is  larger  now, 
or  would  the  bureau  be  the  same  size  now? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  These  bureaus  are  always  small,  but  they  hold 
periodical  conferences  to  which  they  invite  the  principal  functionaries 
of  the  various  Communist  Parties  under  their  jurisdiction. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  And  the  control  goes  downward  that  way? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  That's  right. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Now,  at  the  time  that  you  were  familiar  with  a 
part  of  Communist  work  in  Latin  America,  what  persons  did  you 
know  who  were  then  active  in  that  work,  who  are  still  active  in  the 
Communist  conspiracy? 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  39 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  You  mean  in  South  America? 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Yes. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge,  those  still 
active  that  I  knew  personally,  is,  at  the  present  time,  the  secretary  of 
the  Communist  Party  of  Colombia,  whose  name  is  Gilberto  Viera. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Is  that  V-i-e-r-a? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

Then,  the  present  secretary  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Venezuela, 
Juan  Fuenmayor. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  F-u-e-n-m-a-y-o-r? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

These  individuals  became  radicals  while  they  were  students  at  the 
Universities  of  Bogota  or  Caracas,  and  very  able  individuals  and  very 
personable — I  mean,  educated  individuals.  They  came  from  some  of 
the  best  families  of  those  two  countries. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Do  you  know  another  student,  Delgado — Francisco 
Delgado? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Ycs,  Francisco  Delgado.  He  also  originated  at 
the  University  of  Caracas,  and  he  was  a  very  able  individual,  especially 
as  an  organizer. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Did  you  work  with  these  men  at  that  time? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  I  did. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Was  it  part  of  your  function  at  that  time  to  recruit 
students,  student  leaders,  into  the  parties,  that  is,  respectively  in 
Venezuela  and  Colombia? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  in  South  America  that  is  one  of  the  principal 
approaches  of  the  Communists,  to  get  at  the  students,  and  the  students 
down  there  are,  as  it  were,  ideologically  preoccupied  with  poHtics,  and 
that,  of  course,  conditions  them  for  the  type  of  propaganda  and  meth- 
ods that  the  Communists  have. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Did  Gilberto  Viera,  at  the  time  you  were  in  Co- 
lombia, have  a  particular  function  directly  under  you? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Ycs.     I  made  him  a  manager  of  the  paper. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  What  paper? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  The  party  published  a  weekly  paper  which  was, 
of  course,  paid  for  out  of  the  subsidy  that  1  had  for  the  operation, 
the  paper  at  that  time  we  called  Verdad  Obrera, 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  This  was  a  Communist  paper? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  This.was  a  Communist  paper,  although  it  didn't 
say  so  on  the  masthead. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Where  did  you  get  the  subsidy  that  you  spoke  of? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  I  had  an  authorization  for  the  first  year  for 
operations  in  Colombia,  the  minimum,  which  was  $15,000. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  You  got  that  money  from  Moscow? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Did  you  ever  get  any  money  from  the  United 
States  for  your  operations  in  Latin  America? 


40  COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  the  money  was  transferred  to  me  through 
the  United  States  by  an  arrangement  with  the  then  secretary  of  the 
party,  Earl  Browder,*  but  it  was  Moscow  money. 

Mr.  SouRwiN'E.  The  money  came  to  you  through  the  United  States, 
through  Earl  Browder,  but  from  Moscow? 

Mr.  KoRN'FEDER.  That's  right. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Now,  do  you  recall  any  other  persons  who  you 
know  worked  with  you  as  Communists,  when  you  were  in  Latin 
America,  and  who  are  still  active  in  the  Communist  conspiracy? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  You  mean  those  that  were  not  active  in  South 
America  itself? 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  I  am  asking  for  anyone  whom  you  at  that  time 
loicw  to  have  been  active  in  the  party,  in  South  America  or  Latin 
America,  who  is  presently  still  active  in  the  party. 

Mr.  KoRNFCDER.  I  have  no  doubt  that  Bittelman  is  still  active  in 
this  operation,  due  to  his  experience.  Most  of  the  others  that  I  knew 
at  the  time  are,  as  far  as  I  know,  out  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the 
United  States. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  When  you  were  on  the  Caribbean  Bureau,  were 
there  any  other  Americans  on  it  besides  Bittelman? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Ycs.     There  was — well,  I  remember  some. 

Senator  Keating.  Now,  what  year  was  this? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  This  was  1932,  and  1933. 

*  Robert  Alexander,  author  of  "  Communism  In  Latin  America"  has  acknowledged  In  his  foreword  that 
Earl  Browder  has  given  him  considerable  Information  which  he  has  used  In  his  book,  from  which  the 
following  references  are  given: 

(1)  Mr.  Alexander  states  that  the  Communist  Parties  of  the  Caribbean  were  directed  from  New  York  and 
that  leaders  of  the  Communist  Party,  U.S.A. ,  intervened  in  the  affairs  of  the  Mexican  Communist  Party  at 
least  twice  during  the  1920's.  In  1937  Earl  Browder  Intervened  to  prevent  the  Mexican  Communists  from 
engineering  a  split  in  the  Confederation  of  Workers  of  Mexico.  He  talked  at  considerable  length  with 
Vicente  Lombaido  Toledano.    (36) 

(2)  Leading  American  Communists  were  assigned  to  missions  in  Latin  America,  as  for  example,  Joseph 
Zack  Kornfeder.    (36) 

(3)  Financial  contributions  to  Latin  American  Communist  Parties  came  from  New  York.    (37) 

(4)  Leadinc;  Comintern  agents  who  were  known  in  American  Communist  circles  were  active  in  Latin 
America,  such  as  Arthur  Ewert  (111),  Carlos  Contreras  (37)  and  Oerhart  Eisler.  Leading  members  of  the 
Comintern  took  part  in  discussions  regarding  Latin  America.    (38) 

(5)  Earl  Browder  participated  in  a  meeting  with  the  Latin  American  Communist  Parties  while  he  was  In 
Moscow.  He  was  suggested  as  the  principal  adviser  and  consultant  of  the  Latin  American  Communist 
parties.  There  were  frequent  conferences  between  Browder  and  leaders  of  Latin  American  Communist 
parties  In  New  York.    (38) 

(6)  The  Conference  of  Latin  American  Communist  Parties  was  held  in  Moscow  In  1038  at  which  Browder 
and  Manuilsky,  Comintern  leader,  were  present.    (42) 

(7)  Dmitri  Manuilsky  addressed  a  meeting  of  delegates  of  various  Latin  American  Communist  Parties  In 
Moscow  in  1938  urging  that "  Above  all,  our  force  must  be  used  in  defense  of  the  Soviet  Union."  The  entire 
statement  Is  most  significant.    Browder  was  undoubtedly  present  at  this  meeting.    (43,  44) 

(8)  BrowHpr  Intervened  in  the  Mexican  Communist  Party  affairs  in  1937  and  on  other  occasions.  (79)  An 
account  of  this  appeared  In  the  New  York  Daily  Worker  of  July  3, 1937.     (333,  334) 

(9)  Earl  Browuer  intervened  with  President  Roosevelt  in  behalf  of  Victorio  Codovilla,  a  leading  Latin 
American  Communist.    (170) 

(10)  Statement  on  unity  of  Latin  American  Communist  Parties.  ("The  Second  Imperialist  War"  by 
Earl  Browder,  p.  45.) 

(11)  Statement  attacking  Leon  Trotsky  and  his  activities  in  Mexico.  ("The  People's  Front"  by  Earl 
Browder,  pp.  305,  306,  307.) 

(12)  Chapter  entitled  "Labor  Unity  In  Mexico."  (Ibid.,  pp.  321  to  326,  a  speech  delivered  In  Mexico 
City  on  June  29,  1937.) 

(13)  Statement  on  Latin  America  and  Mexico.    ("The  Way  Out"  by  Earl  Browder,  p.  40.) 

(14)  The  Pan-.\merican  conference  in  Havana.  (Ibid,  pp.  74-80  which  appeared  in  the  Daily  Worker  of 
July  19,  1940.) 

(15)  Chapter  entitled  "The  Situation  in  Mexico."  (Ibid,  pp.  94, 95,  which  appeared  in  the  Daily  Worker 
of  Sept. «,  1940.) 

(16)  Statement  on  mass  movements  in  Latin  American  countries.  (Ibid.,  pp.  174,  175,  from  a  report  to 
the  National  Committee  of  the  Communist  Party,  Nov.  16,  1940.) 

(17)  Statement  on  Latin  America  and  American  imperialism.  (Ibid.,  p.  201,  from  a  speech  delivered  at 
the  Lenin  memorial  meeting,  Madison  Square  Garden  on  Jan.  13, 1941.) 

(18)  Chapter  entitled  "Good  Neighbors  in  the  Americas."    ("Teheran"  by  Earl  Browder,  pp.  56  to  63.) 

(19)  ChaiJf er  entitled  "Latin  America's  Contribution  to  Victory."  ("Victory  and  After"  by  Earl  Browder 
pp.  213  to  224.) 

(20)  The  following  articles  by  Browder  are  taken  from  the  Communist,  also  known  as  Political  Affairs: 
"Browder  on  Latin  America,"  February  1939,  p.  132;  also,  September  1939,  p.  756. 

"Browder  on  Latin  .\merica,"  September  1940,  p.  819. 

"Browder  and  Mexico,"  May  1941,  p.  447. 

"Browder  and  Latin  America,"  June  1941,  pp.  496,  620  f.,  630. 

"Latin  America  Demands  Browder's  Freedom,"  August  1941,  p.  693. 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  41 

Senator  Keating.  Do  you  know  whether  the  ones  you  are  about  to 
name  are  still  active  in  the  Caribbean  Bureau? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  No,  I  dou't.  I  am  not  sure  whether  they  are 
or  not. 

Senator  Keating.  We  will  receive  such  evidence  as  that,  in  execu- 
tive session,  not  in  a  pubhc  hearing. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  The  onh^  reason  I  would  have  for  saying  it  is 
that  it  requires  a  great  deal  of  experience  to  be  on  these  bureaus,  and 
those  that  have  acquired  experience,  as  long  as  they  remain  in  the 
party,  are  usually  assigned  to  this  type  of  operation. 

Senator  Keating.  I  think  in  the  case  of  Bittelman,  you  believe  him 
to  be  still  connected  with  the  Caribbean  Bureau. 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  With  the  Latin  American  activities,  yes. 

Senator  Keating.  But  in  other  cases  you  are  not  informed  at  this 
time  whether  or  not  they  are? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  That's  right,  sir.    I  don't  know  it  for  positive. 

Senator  Keating.  I  think  we  had  better  receive  that  evidence  in 
executive  session,  as  far  as  the  naming  of  names  is  concerned. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  should  like  to  have  permission 
to  read  to  the  witness  one  brief  passage  from  the  book,  "Outline  of 
Political  History  of  the  Americas,"  by  William  Z.  Foster,  and  I  want 
to  ask  the  witness  for  the  significance  of  this  paragraph: 

The  writer  wishes  to  express  his  thanks  to  the  many  men  and  women  who 
either  read  and  criticized  the  manuscripts  of  the  books  or  cooperated  in  the 
extensive  research  and  technical  work  required  for  its  writings.  These  include 
James  S.  Allen,  Herbert  Aptheker,  Marion  Bachrach,  Theodore  Bassett,  Eric 
Bert,  Alexander  Bittelman,  Tim  Buck,  Vittorio  Codovilla,  J.  Colon,  '  arl  Dorf- 
man,  Robert  W.  Dunn,  Dionisio  Encina,  Philip  S.  Foner,  Gilbert  Green,  Grace 
Hutchins,  Cesar  Andreu  Iglesias,  Bias  Roca,  Carlos  Rafael  Rodriguez,  Stanley 
B.  Ryerson,  Joseph  Starobin,  Celeste  Strack,  and  Robert  Thompson. 

This  is  a  book  wTitten  by  William  Z.  Foster,  outlining  the  history, 
as  he  sees  it. 

What  is  the  significance  of  this  paragraph  of  credit? 

Senator  Keating.  What  is  the  date  of  that? 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  1951. 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Oh,  the  significance  is  that  all  these  individuals 
were  familiar  with  one  or  another  aspect  of  Communist  operations  in 
South  America,  that  is  why  Foster  consulted  them  in  writmg  the 
book.     1  know  quite  a  number  of  those  that  you  have  listed. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Well,  let's  see  which  ones  of  them  you  know. 

Do  you  know  James  Allen? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  I  know  Allen,  but  under  a  different  name.  I 
don't  recall  the  name  any  more. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Is  he  a  Communists 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Oh,  yes. 

Mr,  Sourwine.  Is  he  an  American  Communist? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  As  far  as  I  know. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  He  is? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Yes. 

Senator  Keating.  Now,  you  are  speaking  of  today,  when  you  say 
"Communist  today,"  you  Imow  him  to  be  a  Communist  today? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  he  is  still  active  in  the  Communist  organi- 
zation. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  What  was  his  name  you  knew  him  under? 

Mri  Kornfeder.  I  can't  recall  at  the  moment. 


42  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Auerbach? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Auerbach ;  that's  right. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Did  you  recognize  the  name  of  Herbert  Aptheker? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Yes;  I  recognized  the  name  but  I  can't  place  his 
image;  I  don't  know  whether  I'm  right. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Was  he  an  American? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  As  far  as  I  know. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Do  you  know  whether  he  is  a  Communist? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  He  is. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Do  you  recognize  the  name  of  Marion  Bachrach? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Ycs;  I  recognize  the  name. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Do  you  know  that  individual  as  a  Communist? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Ycs ;  I  know  her  as  a  Communist.  I  don't  know 
whether  she  is  still  in  the  party. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  You  say,  "her" — Marion?  Marion  Bachrach?  Is 
that  a  man  or  a  woman? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  I  was  under  the  impression  it  was  a  woman. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  All  right. 

Alexander  Bittelman  you  testified  about? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.    YcS. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Do  you  know  Victorio  Cordovilla? 
Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  I  know  him  by  reputation,  I  don't  know  him 
personally. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Is  he  an  Argentine? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Do  you  know  Dionisio  Encina? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Wlio  is  that? 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Dionisio  Encina — E-n-c-i-n-a. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  No,  I  don't  think  so. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  He  is  a  Mexican,  isn't  he? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Yes. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Do  you  know  Cesar  Iglesias? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.    No. 

Mr.  SoxjRwiNE.  A  Puerto  Rican,  isn't  he? 
Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Yes. 
Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Do  you  know  Bias  Roca? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Blas  Roca  I  remember;  I  remember  vaguely. 
He  is  from  Cuba. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Do  you  know  Carlos  Rafael  Rodriguez? 
Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  I  belicvc  he  is  also  from  Cuba. 
Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Do  you  know  Joseph  Starobin? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.   Yes. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Do  you  know  him  as  a  Communist? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  I  know  him  as  a  Communist,  but  I  know  him 
imder  a  different  name;  again  I  cannot  recall  the  name  at  the  moment. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  So,  here  you  have  people  from  a  half  a  dozen 
American  countries,  speaking  of  the  whole  hemisphere,  North  and 
South  America,  who  were  cooperating  with  William  Z.  Foster  in  thf 
preparation  of  this  book  on  history,  from  the  Communist  slant? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  I  may  say  also  at  this  point  that  the  Ameri- 
can Communist  Party  all  along,  from  the  early  twenties,  had,  as  it 
were,  an  authorization  from  Moscow,  of  political  patronage  over  the 
activities  in  South  America,  and  throughout  the  years  has  used  many 
of  its  members  as  organizers  in  South  America.  In  fact,  originally 
whatever  activity  was  in  South  America  was  directed  from  New  York. 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  43 

The  two  bureaus,  that  I  mentioned,  were  only  created,  one  in  the 
mid-twenties  and  the  other  was  created  in  1931.  Until  then  the 
American  party  was  the  one  that  was  directing  whatever  Communist 
activities  were  in  South  America,  and  ever  since  the  American  party 
is  consulted  on  anything  relating  to  Latin  America. 

Senator  Keating.  What  was  the  address  in  New  York  City  of  the 
Caribbean  Bureau? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  They  met — it  was  a  secret  bureau  which,  of 
course,  operated  like  all  of  their  bureaus,  through  secret  addresses, 
but  the  meetings  were  held  at  the  party  headquarters  at  that  time. 

Senator  Keating.  Have  you  had  any  contacts  since  you  broke  with 
the  party  in  1934;  have  you  had  any  contacts  with  any  of  these  indi- 
viduals since  that  time 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  No.  When  a  leader — I  was  one  of  the  leaders — 
quits,  well,  the  situation  that  develops  as  a  result  of  it  is  such  that 
none  of  the  other  leaders  would  dare  to  contact  him  except  by  special 
instructions.  I,  of  course,  knew  that,  and  I  did  not  contact  them, 
neither. 

Senator  Keating.  And  you  have  not  bumped  into  them  in  any 
way  since  then? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Oh,  I  have  bumped  into  them,  but  the  bumping 
didn't  lead  to  any  briefing. 

Senator  Keating.  I  am  curious  about  a  person  who  breaks  with  the 
Communist  Party  and  runs  into  his  former  friends  who  were  in  it. 
What  does  he  do?     Do  they  speak? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  He  just  stares  through  them  as  if  they  were  not 
there. 

Senator  Keating.  They  don't  have  any  communication,  then? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right.  They  build  a  system  of  hatred; 
if  you  quit  them  and  you  are  a  leader,  you  are  an  enemy.  In  fact, 
you  are  worse  than  the  usual  enemy.  They  consider  you,  let's  say,  all 
non-Communists,  in  the  category  of  enemies,  it  depends  how  much, 
how  active  they  happen  to  be,  but  a  leader  that  quits  them,  well,  he 
has  a  high  priority  as  an  enemy. 

Senator  Keating.  Proceed. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  When  you  left  Moscow  to  take  up  your  work  in 
Latin  America,  were  you  given  any  task  with  respect  to  Panama? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Yes.  I  was  supposed  to  stop  in  Panama  and 
settle  a  dispute  that  was  then  going  on  between  three  groups  of 
Communists. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Did  you  perform  that  task? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  No.  I  did  not  perform  the  task  because  the 
address  I  had  for  the  initial  contact  proved  to  be  a  false  one,  and  I 
could  not  stay  there  and  wait  for  some  new  addresses. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Was  that  dispute  among  the  Communist  factions 
in  Panama  subsequently  settled? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Ycs ;  it  was.  According  to  my  information,  it 
was  later  handled  by  Romulo  Betancourt  who  is  now  President  of 
Venezuela,  who  at  that  time  was  a  Communist. 

Senator  Keating.  Was  he  working  with  you  in  the  biu'eau  at  that 
time? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  No.  Well,  he  was  one  of  the  principal  operators 
in  South  America,  and  he,  I  am  sure,  worked  under  the  direction  of 
the  bureau,  but  I  never  actually  met  the  individual. 


44  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

Senator  Keating.  What  was  his — was  he  in  an  official  position  in 
his  country  at  that  time? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  No.  That  was  during  the  dictatorship  of  Juan 
Vincente  Gomez.  He  was  one  of  those  exiled,  so  he  worked  in  other 
South  American  countries,  but  not  in  Venezuela. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Where  did  you  go  first  when  you  went  there — 
Colombia  or  Venezuela? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  I  first  went  to  Colombia. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Outline  for  us  briefly  your  operations  in  Colombia. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Wcll,  in  Colombia  it  was  possible  to  operate 
more  or  less  openly,  although  there  was  a  special  law  against  com- 
munism on  the  statute  books.  But  in  the  Lenin  School  one  is  taught 
how  to  bypass  tiiat  type  of  legislation,  and  we  just  operated  formally 
as  being  not  Communist,  being  something  else. 

So,  one  could  organize  committees  and  fronts,  and  so  on,  rather 
openly,  and  so  I  proceeded  along  that  line. 

Senator  Keating.  You  were  taught  to  deny  you  were  a  Communist 
if  it  was  necessary,  to  serve  your  purposes? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

Senator  Keating.  And  3"ou  were  taught  that  an  oath  meant  noth- 
ing and  that  you  didn't  have  to  comply  with  any  oath  if  you  were 
asked  if  you  were  a  Communist? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Yes.  That  holds  true  for  all  Communists, 
because  an  oath  is  what  they  call — they  call  it  bourgeois  fiction, 
which,  of  course,  a  Communist  isn't  supposed  to  be  impressed  by  at  all. 

Well,  the  contact  in  Colombia  was  made.  I  had  a  number  of 
addresses  of  members  of  a  party  that  v/as  disintegrating,  that  was 
known  then  as  the  "Partido  Socialista  Revolucionario." 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  The  Socialist  Revolutionary  Party  of  Colombia? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right,  and  there  were  still  about  60  active 
individuals. 

]Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Sixteen  or  sixty? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Sixty  of  that  organization  who  could  be  con- 
sidered as  potentially  active  elements.  One  of  those  mentioned  is 
Gilbert©  Vicra  who  later  became  secretary  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Was  there  a  high  proportion  of  students  among 
this  60? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Oh,  yes.  There  was  a  group  of  students  at  the 
University  of  Bogota.  In  fact,  they  were  from  the  beginning  the 
principal  group. 

Then,  through  this  party  that  was  then  going  to  pieces,  we  obtained 
some  contacts  amongst  the  labor  unions  and  especially  a  group 
amongst  the  Colombian  peasants,  and  I  started  training  these  ele- 
ments by  bring  them  to  Bogota  and  giving  them  a  2  weeks'  training 
course  especially  in  organization  work.  Organization  is  the  thing 
that  they  know  the  least  about,  and  they  are  tremendously  impressed 
by  anyone  that  brings  with  them  organization  knowledge.  So,  I 
trained  those  groups  in  2-week  courses,  about  10  at  a  time,  and  that 
really  paid  off  as  far  as  organization  is  concerned.  They  were  the 
elements  out  of  which  vv'e  later  on  formed  a  committee  to  organize  a 
labor  federation  in  Colombia,  and  a  peasants'  league  amongst  the 
coffee  plantation  workers  and  other  peasants. 

Well,  also  out  of  that  group — we  liad  the  beginnings  of  an  intelli- 
gentsia for  the  party.  After  about  a  year  of  concentrated  activity,  we 
had  an  organization  of  about  1,200  members  in  the  Communist  Party, 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  45 

plus  groups  inside  labor  unions  and,  for  the  first  time  in  the  history  of 
Colombia,  f  n  organization  amongst  the  peasants. 

Mr.  Soui^wiNE.  You  went  there  with  60,  and  at  the  end  of  about 
a  year  you  had  1,200? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  You  had  infiltrated  the  labor  unions,  you  had 
created  a  front  operation  for  operations  among  the  peasants? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

Mr.  Sour  WINE.  Where  did  you  go  then — to  Venezuela? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Yes.     Then  I  went  to  Venezuela. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Tell  us  about  your  work  in  Venezuela. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  Venezuela  was  an  entirely  different  situa- 
tion. It  was  one  of  those  pretty  tight  dictatorships  under  a  man  who 
had  originally  been,  so  the  story  says,  a  bandit  in  the  Andes,  a  very 
able  one. 

Senator  Keating.  A  what? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  A  bandit  in  the  Andes. 

Mr.  Sour  WINE.  Are  you  talking  about  Juan  Vincente  Gomez? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That  is  one  of  the  big  mountain  ranges. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Who  is  the  man  you  are  speaking  of? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Gomez,  Juan  Vincente  Gomez.  He  established 
a  dictatorship,  taking  over  a  democratic  situation,  but  by  the  time  I 
got  down  there  it  was  a  dictatorship  which  did  not  allow  any  opposi- 
tion whatsoever,  whether  Commimist,  Sociahst,  Liberal,  Conserva- 
tive, or  whatnot.     He  just  didn't  allow  operations — period. 

And,  the  organization  had  to  be  underground  from  the  very  be- 
ginning. The  contacts  there  again  were  first  with  the  students  at  the 
University  of  Caracas,  and  basing  myself  on  the  experience  in  Colom- 
bia, I  begun  to  instruct  them  in  organization  techniques. 

Well,  it  didn't  take  long,  I  probably  had  trained  about  two  groups, 
each  of  them  of  10  individuals,  when  the  dictator's  political  police 
raided  the  place  where  we  were  meeting,  and  so,  together  with  about 
10  others,  I  was  taken  to  one  of  the  most  notorious  jails  in  South 
America. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  You  were  arrested  and  put  in  jail? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Yes. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  What  town,  what  city? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  In  Caracas. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  A  prison  in  Caracas? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  The  name  of  the  prison,  which  later  on  was  torn 
do%vn  after  Gomez  died,  was  La  Rotunda. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  La  Rotunda? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  An  ancient  fort  built  by  the  Spaniards,  and  later 
on  converted  into  a  prison. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  How  long  were  you  in  that  prison? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  I  was  there  about  5  months. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  What  efiect  did  this  arrest  and  imprisonment  have 
on  your  work  for  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Oh,  it  had  a  very  good  effect. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  A  good  effect? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  A  Very  good  effect. 

See,  the  grapevine  in  this  type  of  country  is  quite  an  institution,  and 
when  it  became  known  among  the  intellectuals,  who  were  all  opposed 
to  the  dictatorship,  that  the  Communists  had  at  last  come  to  help 

66492   O  -  61  -  2 


46  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

them,  the  effect  of  that  was  considerable,  and  also  I  found  out  that 
in  the  prison  they  had  established  a  method  of  contacting,  even  though      ' 
all  precautions  were  taken  against  contacts.  •; 

The  prison  was  divided  into  different  compartments  very  much 
separated,  so  it  seemed,  but  actually  the  word  went  around  that  at 
long  last  the  Communists,  who  knew  how  to  organize,  have  come  and 
after  Gomez  died  and  all  these  intellectuals  got  out  of  the  prison,  the  ' 
party  had  a  considerable  influence  among  them,  and  accounts  for  their 
very  fast  growth. 

Senator  Keating.  You  were  not  there  when  he  died? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  No ;  I  was  already  back  in  the  United  States. 

Senator  Keating.  Were  you  given  any  trial  of  any  kind  there? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  No.  They  don't  proceed  with  trials,  that  is  just 
something  like  in  Russia;  you  are  arrested,  thrown  in  jail,  and  then  if 
the  dictator  makes  up  his  mind  for  one  reason  or  another  to  let  you 
go,  you  are  just  let  go;  that's  all. 

Senator  Keating.  I  was  just  coming  to 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  How  did  you  get  out? 

Senator  Keating.  I  was  coming  to  that.     How  did  you  get  out? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  In  my  case,  of  course,  I  was  not  a  Venezuelan,,      i 
I  was  an  American.     So,  I  had  the  privilege  of  having  a  whole  cell  to 
myself,  instead  of  being  bimched  together  with  20  others.     I  was  in      ' 
solitary,  which  was — ^well,  no  one  else  had  that  privilege  in  that 
prison,  but  I  got  out  through  the  efforts  of  the  State  Department. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Of  the  United  States?  i 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  How  was  this  brought  about?  i 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  I  don't  know  the  details,  but  I  know  that      | 
the  party  used  its  contacts  in  the  United  States  to  push  the  case.  I 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  This  was  in  what  year? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  This  was  in  1932. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Now,  after  you  were  sprung  from  the  Venezuelan      i 
jail  by  the  State  Department  of  the  United  States,  did  you  go  forward 
with  your  work  as  a  Comintern  agent,  or  did  you  then  leave  Vene- 
zuela? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  I  was  deported  in  grand  style,  with  a  decree      ' 
signed  by  President  Gomez  appearing  on  the  front  pages  of  all  the 
papers  in  Venezuela. 

Mr.  SouRwixB.  You  then  left  Venezuela? 

Mr.  KoRXFEDER.  That's  right.  j 

Mr.  SouRWix'E.  That  is  when  you  returned  to  New  York  and  be-      ' 
came  a  member  of  the  Caribbean  bureau  of  the  Communists? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

Mr.  SouRwiXE.  While  you  were  in  Venezuela,  you  said  most  of 
your  work  had  to  be  done  underground.     Were  there  any  particular       \ 
classes  or  groups  of  people  or  workers  on  whom  you  were  instructed 
to  concentrate? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Oh,  yes.  For  Venezuela,  the  instruction  was  to 
concentrate  on  the  oil  workers  in  Maracaibo,  the  oil  area.  ' 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Did  you  do  that? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  I  did  not  have  the  time  to.     I  only,  as  it       j 
were,  set  up  a  committee  to  do  that,  and  trained  them  for  several 
weeks  in  organization  techniques.     But,  the  instructions  were  to  first       | 
create  a  political  organization.     It  would  not  do  to  come  into  a  coun-       ■ 
try  and  say,  "Well,  Moscow  wants  you  to  be  organized." 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  47 

You  do  that  in  the  name  of  a  native  movement,  so  since  there  was 
no  such  movement,  that  movement  had  to  be  first  created.  But,  the 
strategy  of  Moscow  in  this  respect  was,  however,  carried  out  because 
the  concentration  in  subsequent  years  was  on  the  oil  workers  and  the 
oil  workers  in  Venezuela  did  get  organized  by  the  Communists. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Why  the  oil  workers?  Why  did  they  want  to  con- 
centrate on  the  oil  workers? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That  has  to  do,  again,  with  the  overall  perspec- 
tive on  the  United  States.  They  figured  that— they  think  way  ahead 
when  it  comes  to  big  strategic  patterns.  They  figured  that  in  the 
final  clash  with  the  United  States,  the  oil  of  Venezuela,  which  is  high 
quality  oil,  would  play  a  big  role,  and  if  they  could  shut  it  off  during 
strategic  moments  and  sabotage  it,  and  so  on  and  so  forth,  it  would 
play  an  important  role  in  the  situation. 

So,  they  were  20  years  ahead.  But  the  United  States  was  even 
then  their  long-range  objective. 

Now,  they  are  concentrating  directly  on  it;  at  that  time  it  was  a 
long-range  objective,  and  they  thought  that  far  ahead,  and  the  in- 
struction was  to  concentrate  on  organizing  the  oil  workers  above  all, 
but  first  organize  the  party  through  which  to  do  it. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Has  the  Communist  international  conspiracy  con- 
tinued to  send  representatives  into  Latin  America  since  you  left  the 
party? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Oh,  I  am  sure  they  have.  They  couldn't  operate 
without  it. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  What  do  you  know  of  such  agents? 

Mr,  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  they  have  periodical  conferences  of  repre- 
sentatives of  Communist  Parties,  and  at  these  conferences  names  re- 
appeared that  I  happened  to  be  familiar  with.  They  carry  on  cam- 
paigns with  the  same  line  throughout  Latin  America,  irrespective  of 
parties— a  thing  like,  for  instance,  Nixon's  tour — there,  I  could  very 
well  understand,  knowing  their  organization  in  such  an  operation, 
because  I  had  participated  while  I  was  down  there  in  other  similar 
operations  that  were  organized  on  a  continental  basis. 

They  have  a  cohesive  machine  which  is  well  centralized  and  can 
carry  out  strategy  and  tactics,  and  do  it  at  a  great  speed. 

Senator  Keating.  Do  you  know  if  they  have,  now? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER,  They  have  now,  and  they  had  then. 

Senator  Keating.  Mr.  Khrushchev  says  that  they  don't  carry  on 
any  activities  outside  of  Russia,  but  they  are  only  interested  in  main- 
taining the  Communist  Party  and  the  movement  in  Russia.  You  find 
yourself  in  considerable  disagreement  with  that,  do  you? 

Mr.KoRNFEDER.  Well,  that  is  a  fiction,  probably  the  biggest  fiction 
of  all  fictions,  because,  they  always  maintain  that  they  are  not  re- 
sponsible for  activities  of  the  Communist  Parties;  thej^  are  responsible 
only  for  the  official  declarations  and  statements  of  the  Soviet  Govern- 
ment. 

But,  Senator,  I  can  assure  you  that  it  is  the  biggest  lie  that  was  ever 
presented  on  earth.  There  isn't  an  ounce  of  truth  in  it.  I  mean  the 
whole  thing  is  directed  from  Moscow,  always  was. 

Senator  Keating.  Tell  me,  Mr.  Kornfeder,  what  caused  you  to 
break  with  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  there  were  two  thingp  that  prompted  me, 
and  principal  among  them  was  what  I  saw  in  Russia ;  it  was  so  much 
contrary  to  what  I  thought  was  there.     I  mean  ideals,  my  ideals 


48  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

Senator  Keating.  Let  me  interrupt  you  a  minute.  You  went  back 
there  in  1934,  did  you? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  I  was  there  from  1927  to  1930. 

Senator  Keating.  Yes,  but  you  left  there  as  a  dedicated  Com- 
munist. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  AVcIl,  I  was  still  a  Communist  in  my  theoretical 
thinking  and,  in  fact,  I  was  still  a  Communist^ — -period. 

But,  I  had  some  thoughts 

Senator  Keating.  I  see. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Tliouglits  that  began  to  grow,  and  the  thoughts 
originated  from  my  stay  in  Russia,  and  the  reason  for  them  were  two- 
fold, in  brief: 

One  was  the  actual  situation,  which  was  very  different  from  what 
the  Daily  Worker  in  the  United  States  would  say.  I  mean,  the 
description  in  the  Communist  press  in  the  United  States  about  the 
idyllic  conditions  in  Russia  were  simply  completely  a  hoax. 

But,  the  other  thing  that  impressed  me  as  a  Communist  is  that  for 
the  first  time,  Communists  arrested  Communists,  that  was  the  purge 
of  the  Trotskyites. 

Now,  this  you  should  understand,  made  a  special  impact  on  Com- 
munists because  Lenin,  the  founder  of  this  thing,  had  warned  in  his 
last  will,  against  Communists  settling  disputes  among  themselves 
through  police  methods,  and  here  was  Stalin  arresting  thousands  of 
party  members  who  had  made  the  revolution,  because  there  was 
disagreement  on  some  phases  of  strategy. 

Well,  the  impact  of  that  kept  on,  as  it  were,  working  on  me,  and 
although  I  didn't  want  to  admit  that  I  had  been  a  fool  for  15  years 
and  a  very  active  fool,  by  the  way 

Senator  Keating.  You  say  an  active  fool? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Yes.  I  finally  had  to  come  to  the  conclusion 
that  I  was  entirely  wrong,  which  took  a  few  yeai-s  to  do  it.  As  a 
matter  of  fact,  every  leading  Communist  who  quits  the  party,  it 
takes  him  anywhere  from  2  to  5  years  to  get  the  ideas  out  of  his  head. 

Senator  Keating.  How  did  you  come  to  get  into  it  in  the  first  place? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Oil,  I  was  a  Socialist  before  I  became  a  Com- 
munist. I  was  a  member  of  the  Socialist  Party  of  the  United  States, 
and  in  the  split  inside  the  Socialist  Party  I  went  with  the  Communist 
wing  of  it. 

Senator  Keating.  Proceed. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Mr.  Kornfeder,  wasn't  Russia  deliberately  violat- 
ing the  Monroe  Doctrine  in  sending  you  and  other  agents  into  Latin 
America? 

^li".  KoRNFEDER.  Yes.  This  thing  came  up  at  the  Latin  American 
Secretariat  in  Moscow,  came  up  at  a  time  when  several  of  the  students 
who  were  members  of  the  Latin  American  Secretariat  were  about 
to  return. 

And  of  coiu-se  I  already  know  I  had  an  assignment,  so  Togliatti 
gave  us  some  briefing  on  that.  He  was  then  the  secretary,  and  his 
briefing  was  that  we  should  not  concern  om-selves  with  it. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  That  is,  Avith  the  Moiu-oe  Doctrine? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  The  Monroe  Doctrine.  We  should  not  concern 
ourselves  with  it  because  the  doctrine  was  designed  for  a  different 
typo  of  intrusion  than  the  one  contemplated  or  carried  out  by 
Communists.  That  is,  the  Moiu-oo  Doctrine  was  designed  for 
invasion  from  outside  by  foreign  powers.    That  was  his  contention. 


COMMUNIST   THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  49 

"Whereas,  the  Communists,  of  course,  organize  from  inside.  And 
furthermore,  he  said  Communists  cannot  be  guided  by  bourgeois  laws 
which  we,  at  any  rate,  must  violate  in  the  course  of  our  activities 
anywhere  on  the  globe,  so  we  can't  be  guided  by  it  in  this  case.  That 
was  his  attitude. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Mr.  Chairman,  without  laboring  the  point,  but  so 
that  the  record  may  be  clear  as  to  what  the  Monroe  Doctrine  compre- 
hends, I  offer  for  the  record  at  this  time  an  excerpt  from  the  Seventh 
Annual  Message  of  James  Mom'oe,  of  December  2,  1823. 

Senator  Keating.  It  may  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  follows:) 

The  Monroe  Doctrine 
Excerpt  from  Seventh  Annual  Message  of  James  Monroe,  December  2,  1823 

*  *  *  At  the  proposal  of  the  Russian  Imperial  Government,  made  through  the 
minister  uf  the  Emperor  residing  here,  a  full  power  and  instructions  have  been 
transmitted  to  the  minister  of  the  United  States  at  St.  Petersburg  to  arrange  by 
amicable  negotiation  the  respective  rights  and  interests  of  the  two  nations  on 
the  northwest  coast  of  this  continent.  A  similar  proposal  has  been  made  by  His 
Imperial  Majesty  to  the  Government  of  Great  Britian,  which  has  likewise  been 
acceded  to.  The  Government  of  the  United  States  has  been  desirous  by  this 
friendly  proceeding  of  manifesting  the  great  value  which  they  have  invariably 
attached  to  the  friendship  of  the  Emperor  and  their  solicitude  to  cultivate  the 
best  understanding  with  his  Government.  In  the  discussions  to  which  this 
interest  has  given  rise  and  in  the  arrangements  by  which  they  may  terminate  the 
occasion  has  been  judged  proper  for  asserting,  as  a  principle  in  which  the  rights 
and  interests  of  the  United  States  are  involved,  that  the  American  continents,  by 
the  free  and  independent  condition  which  they  have  assumed  and  maintain,  are 
henceforth  not  to  be  considered  as  subjects  for  future  colonization  by  any  European 
powers. 

*  *  *  The  political  system  of  the  allied  powers  is  essentially  different  in  this 
respect  from  that  of  America.  This  difference  proceeds  from  that  which  exists 
in  their  respective  Governments;  and  to  the  defense  of  our  own,  which  has  been 
achieved  by  the  loss  of  so  much  blood  and  treasure,  and  matured  by  the  wisdom 
of  their  most  enlightened  citizens,  and  under  which  we  have  enjoyed  unexampled 
felicity,  this  whole  nation  is  devoted.  We  owe  it,  therefore,  to  candor  and  to  the 
amicable  relations  existing  between  the  United  States  and  those  powers  to  declare 
that  we  should  consider  any  attempt  on  their  part  to  extend  their  system  to  any 
portion  of  this  hemisphere  as  dangerous  to  our  peace  and  safety.  With  the 
existing  colonies  or  dependencies  of  any  European  power  we  have  not  interfered 
and  shall  not  interfere.  But  with  the  Governments  who  have  declared  their 
independence  and  maintained  it,  and  whose  independence  we  have,  on  great  con- 
sideration and  on  just  principles,  acknowledged,  we  could  not  view  any  inter- 
position for  the  purpose  of  oppressing  them,  or  controlling  in  any  other  manner 
their  destiny,  by  any  European  power  in  any  other  light  than  as  the  manifestation 
of  an  unfriendly  disposition  toward  the  United  States.  In  the  war  between  those 
new  Governments  and  Spain  we  declared  our  neutrality  at  the  time  of  their  recog- 
nition, and  to  this  we  have  adhered,  and  shall  continue  to  adhere,  provided  no 
change  shall  occur  which,  in  the  judgment  of  the  competent  authorities  of  this 
Government,  shall  make  a  corresponding  change  on  the  part  of  the  United  States 
indispensable  to  their  security. 

*  *  *  Our  policy  in  regard  to  Europe,  which  was  adopted  at  an  early  stage 
of  the  wars  which  have  so  long  agitated  that  quarter  of  the  globe,  nevertheless 
remains  the  same,  which  is,  not  to  interfere  in  the  internal  concerns  of  any  of  its 
powers;  to  consider  the  government  de  facto  as  the  legitimate  government  for 
us;  to  cultivate  friendly  relations  with  it,  and  to  preserve  those  relations  by  a 
frank,  firm,  and  manly  policy,  meeting  in  all  instances  the  just  claims  of  every 
power,  submitting  to  injuries  from  none.  But  in  regard  to  those  continents 
circumstances  are  eminently  and  conspicuously  different.  It  is  impossible  that 
the  allied  powers  should  extend  their  political  system  to  any  portion  of  either 
continent  without  endangering  our  peace  and  happiness;  nor  can  anyone  believe 
that  our  southern  brethren,  if  left  to  themselves,  would  adopt  it  of  their  own 
accord.     It  is  equally  impossible,  therefore,  that  we  should  behold  such  inter- 


50  COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

position  in  any  form  with  indifference.  If  we  look  to  the  comparative  strength  and 
resources  of  Spain  and  those  new  Governments,  and  their  distance  from  each 
other,  it  must  be  obvious  that  she  can  never  subdue  them.  It  is  still  the  true 
policy  of  the  United  States  to  leave  the  parties  to  themselves  in  the  hope  that 
other  powers  will  pursue  the  same  course  ♦  ♦  *. 

(Source:  Richardson's  "A  Compilation  of  the  Messages  and  Papers  of  the 
Presidents,"  v.  II,  p.  778  and  787-8.) 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Mr.  Kornfeder,  you  said  that  the  Kj-emlin  con- 
sidered all  Latin  America  as  a  unit  for  operational  purposes.  Do  I 
understand  you  correctly? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  That's  right. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Does  that  mean  both  politically  and  organiza- 
tionally? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Both  politically  and  organizationally. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  There  are  20  dinerent  Communist  Parties  in  South 
America,  are  there  not? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Yes,  there  are. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  How  can  these  20  different  parties  be  considered 
as  a  unit,  politically  or  organizationally,  will  you  explain  that? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  the  entire  Communist  concept  is  that  the 
Communist  Party  is  one  party  internationally,  and  the  parties  in  the 
various  countries  are  only  sections  which  are  guided  ^^rom  one  center. 

Now,  if  the  center  decides  to  establish  subcenters  like,  for  instance, 
the  Caribbean  Bureau,  well,  that  is  ]ust  a  mechanism  through  which 
the  centralized  international  party  operates.  That  is  their  basic  con- 
cept. They  do  not  operate  on  the  basis  of  each  individual  party 
being  either  autonomous  or  semiautonomous  or  being  autonomous  in 
any  way.  They  are  just  one  cog  in  the  total  machinery  which  is 
directed  from  a  center. 

The  fact  that  thoy  establish  continental  or  semicontinental  bureaus 
that  is  only  for  the  purpose  of  carrying  out  the  major  concepts  of  this 
bemg  one  international  party. 

Of  com'se,  they  preach  nationalism,  but  anyone  that  becomes  a 
nationalist,  as  a  Communist,  is  expelled,  because  the}''  cannot  tolerate 
nationalism  inside  the  Communist  Party.  That  is  something  for  the 
other  fellow.  They  figure  they  can  use  the  nationalism  of  the  others 
for  their  purposes. 

For  instance,  in  this  particular  case  they  would  like  to  disintegrate 
the  inter- American  relations  that  exist  and  nothing  is  better  than  na- 
tionalism, extremist  nationalism,  with  which  to  make  the  approach. 
So,  they  preach  nationalism,  but  actually  their  ultimate  program,  if 
they  ever  would  succeed,  let's  say,  to  take  South  America,  would  be 
to  establish  one  Soviet  Federation  over  the  whole  area,  just  as  the 
Soviet  Union  is,  and  direct  it  from  one  place  and,  of  course,  affiliated 
with  Moscow. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Mr.  Kornfeder,  you  have  told  us  that  the  Com- 
munist Party's  long-range  strategic  objective  has  not  changed  since 
the  early  1930's.  Has  the  strategy  line  in  proceeding  toward  this 
objective  changed,  to  your  knowledge? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Yes,  it  has. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Will  you  tell  us  about  that? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  this  is  in  fact  the  most  important  develop- 
ment in  South  America  in  the  last  4  years  or  so. 

Originally  their  strategy  in  South  America  was  similar  to  the  one  in 
Europe;  namely,  to  work  for  a  Socialist  overturn.  They  then  con- 
sidered South  America  as  being  a  semideveloped  country,  I  mean, 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  51 

semi-industrialized.  There  were  some  disagreements  on  that,  even 
then,  but  in  the  last  4  years  they  reversed  their  strategy  in  South 
America  completely. 

Senator  Keating.  You  mean  in  the  last  4  years  dating  from  now,  in 
these  last  4  years? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right,  yes. 

They  now  operate  with  a  strategy  which  Lenin  called  the  bourgeois 
democratic  revolution,  carried  out  by  the  proletariat.  Now,  to  un- 
wind this  difficult  phraseology,  they  want  to  carry  out  a  type  of  revo- 
lution in  South  America  which  they  compare,  and  they  take  advantage 
of  the  late  President  Roosevelt,  they  call  it  a  new  deal  revolution,  as 
Castro  does  also,  in  which  they  aim  to  unite  all  the  elements  of  the 
population  against  Yankee  imperialism. 

We  are  the  exclusive  target.  They  aim  to  unite  against  us  even 
what  they  call  the  bourgeoisie,  except  those  that  happen  to  work 
with  Yankee  imperialism,  but  the  entire  attack,  sociologically  and 
strategically  is  concentrated  against  Yankee  imperialism. 

Now,  this  is  a  considerable  departure  from  the  technique  that  they 
had  been  using  years  before,  and  they  figure  that  they  can  effectuate 
that  much  more  successfully,  and  I  must  say,  from  what  I  know  of 
South  Ajnerica,  that  this  is  a  far  more  dangerous  approach  than  the 
one  they  were  trying  out  before.  They  figure  they  will  ride  into  power 
on  the  basis  of  such  a  movement  and  then,  after  they  entrench  them- 
selves, then  they  will  carry  out  the  other  thing  that  they  originally 
had  in  mind. 

In  other  words,  they  are  now  working  on  the  same  thing  in  two 
stages:  First,  the  so-called  new  deal  revolution  manipulated  for  their 
purposes  and  after  they  ride  into  power  and  succeed  to  entrench 
themselves,  then  the  Soviet  type  of  revolution. 

In  other  words,  you  are  likely  to  have  a  phenomenon  in  the  coming 
years  where  the  Communist-inspired  revolutions  wouldn't  look  like 
Communist  revolutions.  They  will  have  all  the  outside  trappings  of 
being  bona  fide  spontaneous  democratic  rebellions. 

In  fact,  that  was  the  main  reason  we  got  confused  about  the  Com- 
munist operations  in  China,  as  you  remember.  What  they  engineered 
there  was  called  an  agrarian  reform.     Of  course  it  was  no  such  thing. 

I  recognized  their  new  operation  because  in  the  Lenin  School,  the 
difference  between  these  two  types  of  revolution  are  very  thoroughly 
explained  and  taught  and  difference  in  techniques  pointed  out. 

For  instance,  Dimitri  Manuilsky  described  the  techniques  they  are 
now  using  as  follows:  "For  backward  countries,  backward  politics." 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  You  mean  that  Moscow  regards  the  countries  of 
Latin  America  as  backward  countries? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Industrially,  backward  countries. 

.  Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Politically  backward? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Politically  backward,  yes. 

So,  they  aim  to  take  those  countries,  not  at  one  stage,  as  their 
original  line,  which  is  very  difficult  and  which  very  often  fails,  but  do 
it  in  two  stages,  along  the  lines  I  just  indicated. 

Now,  there  is  a  great  deal  of  documentation  on  that.  This  new 
line  has  been  written  in  the  programs  of  the  Communist  Parties  in 
South  America  since  the  last — ^beginning  with  1954,  the  party,  the 
program,  the  most  elaborate  dissertation  along  this  line  was  in  the 
program  adopted  by  the  Communist  Party  of  Brazil,  and  the  others 
following  suit  throughout  the  years,  including  Cuba. 


52  COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

That  is  the  significance  of  the  change.  There  is  much  detail  in  it. 
but  I  think  when  we  come  to  Cuba,  it  can  be  explained  in  more  detail. 

Mr.  SouKwiNE.  Mr.  Chairman,  may  I  offer  for  the  record  the  draft 
program  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Brazil  of  1954? 

I  have  the  entire  text  here,  and  I  respectfully  siiggest  that  certain 
excerpts  bearing  upon  the  testimony  of  this  witness  might  be  printed, 
and  the  entire  program  might  be  put  in  the  files  as  part  of  the  report 
by  reference. 

Senator  Keating.  Is  that  a  published  program  of  the  Communist 
Party? 

Mr.  SouPWiNE.  Yes,  sir.  This  is  the  published  program  of  the 
Communist  Party  in  Brazil,  published  in  "For  A  Lasting  Peace  For 
A  People's  Democracy,"  which  is  the  paper  of  the  Information  Bureau 
of  Communist  and  Workers  Parties. 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  received. 

(Excerpts  from  the  document  referred  to  follow:) 

Excerpts  From  "Draft  Programme  op  Communist  Party  of  Brazil,"  Pub- 
lished IN  "For  a  Lasting  Peace  for  a  People's  Democracy,"  February 
26,  1954  (p.  3,  4) 

"The  poverty  of  the  people  in  a  country  so  rich  as  ours  is  tlie  result  of  the 
predatory  policy  of  the  American  monopolies,  the  result  of  the  rule  of  the  owners 
of  the  latifundia  and  big  Brazilian  capitalists." 

*  )|c  4e  *  *  *  iK 

"Thus,  the  entire  national  economy  of  Brazil  is  being  turned  into  a  mere 
appendai^e  to  the  U.S.  war  economy.  The  American  imperialists  directly  inter- 
fere in  the  entire  administrative  life  of  the  country;  they  have  taken  over  the 
state  apparatus  of  Brazil  in  order  ruthlessly  to  exploit  and  oppress  our  people, 
to  plunder  the  country's  natural  resources,  and  to  extract  maximum  profit." 

"Thus,  the  U.S.  imperialists  are  penetrating;  to  all  corners  of  economic,  political, 
social,  and  cultural  life  in  Brazil,  humiliating  our  people  and  destroying  the 
independence  and  sovereignty  of  our  nation  which  they  want  to  reduce  to  the 
status  of  a  U.S.  colony." 

******* 

"Industrialists  and  traders  are  unable  to  expand  their  business  because  of 
the  low  jjurchasing  power  of  the  working  masses  and  the  competition  from  Ameri- 
can goods.  American  monopolies  control  entire  branches  of  Brazilian  industry 
and  use  all  the  means  at  their  disposal  to  strangle  and  retard  development  of 
home  industry,  to  prevent  the  founding  of  the  basic  branches  of  industry  needed 
to  free  Brazil  from  the  economic  dependence  in  which  it  now  finds  itself.  The 
control  over  bank  credits,  transport,  the  distribution  of  raw  materials,  and  the 
granting  of  import  and  export  licences  are  utilised  by  the  American  imperialists 
against  Brazilian  industrialists  and  traders.  Imports  of  machinery  needed 
for  the  development  of  industry  become  more  and  more  difficult  while  imports 
of  the  raw  materials  necessary  for  our  honie  industry  are  more  and  more  re- 
stricted." 

******* 

"The   American    imperialists   do   not   confine   themselves    to   plundering   our 
national  wealth  and  unbridled  exploitation  of  our  people.     They  also  want  to 
involve  Brazil  in  the  aggressive  war  for  which  they  arc  getting  ready.     They  do 
not  conceal  their  intention  of  using  the  people  of  Brazil  as  cannon  fodder." 
******* 

"*  *  *  the  war  now  being  prepared  by  the  U.S.  imperialists  is  an  aggressive, 
predatory  war  aimed  at  establishing  world  domination  and  at  enslaving  other 
peoples  for  the  sake  of  maximum  profits." 

*  *  *  *  ♦  *  * 

"History  teaches  that  the  war  now  b('ing  prepared  by  the  U.S.  against  the 
Soviet  Union,  China,  and  the  countries  of  people's  democracy  is  a  gamble,  doomed 
beforehand  to  complete  fiasco." 

***«*«* 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  53 

"Should  the  American  imperialists  unleash  a  new  war  they  will  suffer  inevitable 
defeat." 

*  *  *  '  *  *  *    ,  * 

"The  supreme  interests  of  the  people  of  Brazil  call  for  a  complete  break  with  the 
aggressive  militarist  and  colonising  policy  of  the  U.S." 

******* 

"Brizil  must  put  an  end  to  the  hateful  American  domination  and  establish 
closer  economic  and  cultural  contact  with  all  countries  which  recognise  and  respect 
our  independence,  above  all  with  the  Soviet  Union  and  China." 

******* 

"The  Vargas  Government  is  implanting  in  the  state  apparatus  various  kinds 
of  U.S.  specialists,  assistants  and  advisers  who  directly  interfere  in  the  entire 
administrative  life  of  the  country.  By  means  of  its  agents,  placed  by  the  Vargas 
Ck)veniment  at  the  head  of  the  secret  service  of  the  armed  forces  and  all  police 
organs  in  the  country,  the  U.S.  intelligence  service  interferes  in  the  political  life 
of  the  nation,  persecuting  Brazilian  citizens  who  refuse  to  submit  to  American 
slavery  or  who  fight  for  the  freedom,  sovereignty,  and  independence  of  Brazil." 
******* 

"Brazil  needs  another,  a  genuine  people's  government  capable  of  safeguarding 
the  interests  of  the  overwhelming  majority  of  the  people.  Such  a  government, 
as  the  lawful  representative  of  the  broad  progressive  and  anti-imperifilist  sections 
of  the  population,  would  do  away  with  the  hated  domination  of  the  U.S.  imperial- 
ists, confiscate  the  capital  and  enterprises  belonging  to  the  U.S.  monopolies,  and 
carry  out  a  policy  of  peace  and  cooperation  with  all  other  nations  on  an  equal 
footiTig,  in  keeping  with  the  supreme  interests  of  the  nation.  *  *  *  This  people's 
government  would  be  in  a  position  to  abolish  the  feudal  survivals  and  the  owner- 
ship of  land  Vjy  big  landlords  and  would  ensure  free  distribution  of  the  land  among 
the  peasants  and  all  those  M^ho  want  to  live  by  agricultural  labour.  This  people's 
government  would  put  an  end  to  illiteracy  and  backwardness,  wipe  out  the  local 
diseases,  put  an  end  to  the  machinations  and  unnecessary  expenditure  v.hich  are 
of  benefit  only  to  the  privileged  minoritj^  to  the  expenditure  on  war  prepiirations 
and  would  use  all  this  money  for  immediate  and  effective  aid  to  the  poor  and  to 
those  who  have  suffered  from  the  natural  calamities.  This  people's  government 
would  establish  a  system  of  complete  freedom  and  democracy  for  the  people, 
would  guarantee  industrial  workers  and  other  working  people  their  gains,  their 
rights,  and  ensure  for  the  entire  population  of  Brazil  a  blossoming,  free,  and 
happy  life." 

*  *  *  *  *  *  .  * 

"*  *  *  we  must  put  an  end  to  the  domination  of  the  owners  of  the  latifundia 
and  the  big  capitalists  in  the  service  of  the  U.S.  imperialists  and  overthrow  the 
Vargas  Government. 

"The  Communist  Party  of  Brazil  is  convinced  that  the  democratic  transforma- 
tion.s  needed  by  our  people  can  be  achieved  only  by  a  democratic  government  of 
national  liberation,  by  a  government  in  which  along  with  the  working  class  there 
would  participate  the  peasantry  and  intelligentsia,  the  petty  bourgeoisie  and  the 
national  bourgeoisie." 


'o^ 


"The  Communist  Party  is  fighting  for  Socialism,  but  it  is  convinced  that  in 
the  present  economic,  social,  and  political  conditions  in  Brazil  socialist  trans- 
formations are  impossible.  But  it  is  quite  possible  to  fulfill  the  task  of  replacing 
the  present  antinational  and  antipeople's  government  by  a  people's  government 
which  would  free  Brazil  from  the  domination  of  the  U.S.  imperialists  and  their 
lackej's — the  owners  of  the  latifundia  and  the  big  capitalists." 

******* 

"Annulment  of  all  agreements  and  treaties  with  the  U.S.A.  that  encroach  on  the 
interests  of  the  nation. 

"Confiscation  of  all  capital  and  enterprises  belonging  to  the  American  monop- 
olies and  annulment  of  the  foreign  debt  owed  by  Brazil  to  the  U.S.  Government 
and  U.S.  banks. 

"Clearing  out  of  all  military,  cultural,  economic,  and  technical  U.S.  missions 
from  Brazil." 

******* 
"25.  Guaranteed  freedom  of  private  initiative  for  manufacturers  and  freedom 
of  internal  trade.     The  democratic  government  of  national  liberation  will  not 


54  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

confiscate  the  enterprises  and  capital  of  the  national  bourgeoisie.  It  will,  however, 
confiscate  and  nationalise  the  capital  and  enterprises  belonging  to  big  capitalists 
who  have  betrayed  the  interests  of  the  nation  an4  who  have  alined  themselves 
with  the  U.S.  imperialists." 

***■»**♦ 

"26.  Protection  of  the  national  industry.  To  ensure  that  import  of  foreign 
goods,  mainly  American  goods,  shall  not  injure  home  industry  or  hinder  the  found- 
ing of  new  industrial  branches  and  enterprises.  Free  development  of  industry 
producing  for  civilian  needs  shall  be  guaranteed. 

"27.  Independent  develbpment  of  the  national  economy  and  the  creation  of 
conditions  for  intensified  industrialisation  of  the  country  utilising  for  this  purpose 
the  confiscated  capital  and  enterprises  of  the  American  imperialists.  For  this  it 
will  be  necessary  to  invite  private  capital  which  must  be  guaranteed  profits  and 
protection  in  accordance  with  a  special  law." 

******* 

"34.  Guarantee  of  freedom  of  organisation  and  free  activity  for  the  trade 
unions.  The  trade  unions  shall  be  granted  the  right  freely  to  conclude  collective 
labour  agreements  wit^i  private  and  state  enterprises  and  control  over  their 
implementation. 

"35.  All  forms  of  social  insurance,  including  unemployment  benefit,  shall  be 
paid  at  state  expense  and  at  the  expense  of  the  capitalists.  Pensions  and  benefits 
for  victims  of  industrial  accidents  in  accordance  with  the  needs  of  the  working 
people  and  their  families.  Transfer  to  the  trade  unions  of  management  functions 
and  control  over  the  activity  of  the  social  security  bodies  and  pension  boards." 

"37.  Confiscation  of  all  land  belonging  to  big  landlords  and  its  transfer,  free 
of  charge,  to  landless  and  land-hungry  peasants,  and  to  all  who  care  to  till  it. 
Distribution  of  the  land  shall  be  recognised  by  law  and  each  peasant  given  title 
deeds.  The  possession  and  seizure  of  the  lands,  belonging  to  both  landlords  and 
the  state,  already  effected  by  the  peasants  shall  also  be  recognized  by  law  and 
the  peasants  will  receive  necessary  title  deeds." 

*  *  *  0  *  *  * 

"And  so  all  the  progressive  forces  in  Brazil  irrespective  of  social  status,  party 
aflRliatior  ,  religious  or  philosophical  convictions,  all  democrats  and  patriots  anxious 
to  see  their  homeland  free  and  powerful  will  rally  around  the  great  worker- 
peasant  alliance." 

*  m  *  *  *  *  * 

"The  Communist  Party  of  Brazil  holds  that  the  struggle  for  the  creation, 
extension,  and  reinforcing  of  the  democratic  front  of  national  liberation  is  an 
urgent  and  pressing  task,  a  matter  of  honour  for  all  Brazilian  patriots." 

******  )^ 

"The  Communist  Party  of  Brazil  deems  it  necessary  immediately  to  unite 
throughout  the  country  the  broad  popular  masses,  people  of  all  classes  and  social 
strata  ready  to  fight  for  democracy  and  peace,  against  the  policy  of  war,  hunger 
and  reaction  pursued  by  the  Vargas  Government,  to  fight  for  the  overthrow  of 
the  present  government  and  its  replacement  by  a  democratic  government  of 
national  liberation." 

******* 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Mr.  Komfeder,  you  speak  of  documentation 
respecting  the  Communist  program  for  Latin  America.  Let  me  ask 
you  about  several  items  here. 

Would  you  consider  this  Moscow  conference  in  November  1957,  of 
Latin  American  delegates,  as  a  documentation? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  You  mean,  a  description  of  what  took  place  there? 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Yes. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.    YcS. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  I  ask  that  there  may  be  inserted  in  the  record  at 
this  point,  Mr.  Chairman,  paragraph  24  on  page  34  of  this  subcom- 
mittee's publication  "The  Revival  of  the  Communist  International 
and  its  Significance  for  the  United  States." 

It  is  a  short  page. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  55 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  received. 
(The  paragraph  referred  to  follows :) 

24.  A  conference  of  all  Latin  American  delegates  was  held  under  the  chairman- 
ship of  the  CPSU  specialist  for  Latin  America.  It  was  attended  by  Chinese  Com- 
munist delegates.  Those  who  spoke  were  representatives  of  the  following  Com- 
munist parties:  Brazil,  Argentina,  Chile,  Uruguay,  Cuba,  and  Guatemala. 

The  CPSU  chairman  laid  before  the  meeting  a  program  for  the  Latin  American 
Communist  parties  which  was  accepted.  This  program  included  the  following 
points:  (a)  increased  effort  to  fan  and  exploit  anti-U.S.  sentiment;  (6)  revival  of 
the  Communist-controlled  peace  movement;  (c)  efforts  to  attack  the  Organization 
of  American  States  through  a  Communist-controlled  conference  in  defense  of 
culture;  (d)  support  for  the  Conamunist  movement  in  Cuba;  and  (e)  promotion 
of  the  Soviet  economic  offensive'  in  Latin  America. 

The  Communist  Party  of  China  serves  as  a  coordinating  center  for  Latin  Ameri- 
can activities.  It  is  known  to  maintain  courses  for  the  training  of  Communists 
from  that  area. 

Arrangements  were  made  for  a  number  of  secret  conferences  of  Communist 
parties  of  Latin  America. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  I  show  you  an  article,  a  photostat  of  an  article  from 
the  publication  Kommunist. 

I  wUl  ask  you  whether  this  article  is  part  of  the  documentation  to 
which  you  refer,  and  while  taking  that  down  to  the  witness,  may  I  ask 
Mr.  Mandel  to  state  for  the  record  what  the  publication  Kommunist  is. 

Mr.  Mandel.  The  Kommunist  is  published  in  Moscow  and  is  the 
official  theoretical  organ  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  Soviet  Union. 

There  is  a  translation  there. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Ycs.  I  kuow  the  magazine.  I  used  to  be  a 
contributor  to  it. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  May  I  offer  this  for  the  record,  Mr.  Chairman. 

(Excerpt  from  "Kommunist"  follows:) 

Summary  of  Co^fTE^fTS 

"Kommunist"  Article  by  Ponomarev  on  International  Communist  Movement 

This  publication  presents  the  full  text  of  an  article  by  B.  Ponomarev  titled 
"The  International  Communist  Movement  in  Its  New  Stage,"  which  appeared 
in  the  Moscow  monthly  periodical  Kommunist,  No.  15,  October  1958. 

"Kommunist"  Article  by  Ponomarev  on  International  Communist  Movement 

TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 

Introduction. 
I.  The  Socialist  Camp  Is  Powerful  and  Solid,  as  Never  Before. 
II.  New  Profound  Shocks  in  the  Capitalist  World. 
III.  Some  Problems  of  the  Communist  and  Workers'  Movement. 

introduction 

The  Communists  of  the  Soviet  Union,  the  Soviet  people,  and  the  entire  inter- 
national Communist  movement  are  observing  widely  the  first  anniversary  of  the 
Moscow  Conferences  of  the  Representatives  of  Communist  and  Workers'  Parties. 
These  conferences  were  a  significant  event  in  the  history  of  the  Communist  and 
workers'  movement  and  demonstrated  its  unity  and  loyalty  to  Marxism-Leninism. 
The  declaration  of  the  Conference  of  the  Representatives  of  Communist  and 
Workers'  Parties  of  the  Socialist  Countries  and  the  Peace  Manifesto,  signed  by 
representatives  of  64  Communist  and  workers'  parties  are  militant  programs  for 
the  Communist  and  workers'  movement,  which  throw  the  light  of  Marxism- 
Leninism  on  the  most  important  problems  of  modern  times  and  indicate  ways 
to  solve  these  problems  successfully. 

"The  work  of  the  Conferences  of  the  Representatives  of  the  Communist  and 
Workers'  Parties  in  Moscow  in  November  1957  and  their  decisions,"  noted  the 
Plenum  of  the  Central  Committee  CPSU,  meeting  in  December  1957,  "represents 
a  very  great  achievement  in  the  world  Communist  movement.    These  conferences 


56  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

demonstrated  convincingly  the  future  unity  of  the  socialist  camp  and  the  whole 
international  Communist  movement  on  the  ideological  principles  of  Marxism- 
Leninism.  The  working  out  and  the  declaration  of  the  very  important  tasks 
facing  Communists  in  the  struggle  for  peace,  democracy,  and  socialism  in  the 
present  stage  of  their  peaceful  history,  the  consolidation  of  the  whole  international 
Communist  movement,  and  the  subsequent  strengthening  of  the  ties  between 
the  Communist  parties  are  tlie  most  important  goals  of  the  conferences." 

The  decisions  of  the  conferences  were  approved  by  all  the  fraternal  parties. 
The  resolutions  of  the  congresses  of  the  Communist  parties  and  the  Central 
Committees  emphasize  that  the  Moscow  Conferences  laid  a  firm  foundation  for 
new  victories  in  the  Communist  movement.  The  resolutions  of  the  Second 
Session  of  the  Eighth  Congress  of  the  Communist  Party  of  China  state  the 
following:  "The  declaration  laid  the  ideological  basis  for  the  solidarity  of  the 
Comnmnist  parties  of  various  countries  and  strengthened  the  unity  of  the  socialist 
camp,  led  by  the  Soviet  Union.  This  is  a  program  that  has  ushered  in  a  new 
stage  in  the  international  Communist  movement."  This  is  a  stage  in  the  con- 
tinual strengthening  and  development  of  the  peaceful  socialist  system  and  the 
unprecedented  triumph  of  Marxist-Leninist  ideals. 

This  year  marked  the  further  rise  of  the  forces  of  ascending  socialism  and  the 
extended  fall  and  decay  of  capitalism. 

The  stepup  in  the  growth  of  social  processes  characterizes  the  present  stage. 
It  proceeds  along  two  opposite  lines.  The  countries  of  the  peaceful  socialist 
system  are  moving  more  swiftly  toward  the  creation  of  socialism  and  Communism. 
The  decay  and  fall  of  capitalism,  the  extension  of  capitalism's  general  crisis,  and 
the  intensification  of  all  the  differences  of  the  capitalist  regime  are  taking  place 
faster  than  previously.  This  is  reflected  in  the  great  class  conflicts  within  cap- 
italist systems  and  in  the  conflicts  betw-een  the  forces  of  peace  and  socialism  and 
the  forces  of  war  and  imperialist  reaction. 

The  theoretical  analysis  of  the  contemporary  international  development  and 
the  conclusions  drawn  from  this  analysis  given  in  the  decisions  of  the  20th  Congress 
of  the  CPSU  and  in  the  documents  of  the  Moscow  conferences  are  fully  confirmed 
by  facts. 

The  ideas  of  the  Moscow  conferences  assisted  in  further  rallying  the  interna- 
tional Communist  movement,  in  improving  the  level  of  the  ideological  and  organ- 
izational work  of  the  Communist  parties,  and  in  consolidating  Communist  parties' 
international  ties.  Guarding  the  purity  of  the  Marxist-Leninist  doctrine,  the 
Communist  and  workers'  parties  organized  an  active  large-scale  struggle  against 
revisionism  and  dealt  it  a  number  of  shattering  blows. 

The  international  Communist  movement,  inspired  by  the  Mar.xist-Leninist 
ideas  of  the  Moscow  conferences,  is  confidently  advancing  forward  while  preparing 
for  great  new  victories  of  the  working  class. 

******* 

Very  important  processes  are  taking  place  in  the  Latin  American  countries. 
For  a  long  time,  the  U.S.  imperialists  have  regarded  Latin  America  as  a  sphere  for 
supplementing  their  capital,  as  a  strategic  rear  area  in  the  preparation  for  a  new 
world  war.  "The  policj'  of  the  U.S.,"  testifies  a  deputy  of  the  Peruvian  Congress, 
"was  always  directed  in  such  a  manner  as  to  maintain  Ijatin  American  economy 
in  a  state  of  dependency  and  to  exploit  these  countries  as  its  own  backyard  so 
that  they  are  bound  to  serve  toward  the  fulfillment  of  U.S.  interests." 

The  U.S.  monopolies  seized  the  enterprises  which  are  extracting  the  basic 
natural  resources  of  Latin  America.  The  plundering  of  the  resources  of  Latin 
American  countries  and  the  exploitation  of  their  people  by  the  U.S.  monopolies 
have  attained  monstrous  proportions.  According  to  the  statistics  provided  by  the 
U.N.,  in  1946-1954,  the  U.S.  monopolies  realized  a  profit  of  3.17  dollars  for  every 
dollar  invested  in  Latin  America. 

Having  seized  the  wealth  of  the  nations  of  Latin  America,  the  monopolies  of  the 
U.S.  are  trying  with  all  their  strength  to  repress  the  movement  against  the  eco- 
nomic exploitation  and  political  oppression  of  the  people  of  these  countries  by 
North  American  imperialism. 

However,  now  the  people  of  Latin  America  are  all  the  more  decisively  increasing 
the  struggle  to  defend  their  national  wealth  and  democratic  freedoms.  Latin 
America  is  a  seething  volcano.  As  in  one  countrj',  so  in  another  country,  out- 
bursts are  taking  place  which  are  sweeping  away  reactionary  regimes  and 
are  loosening  the  nooses  which  the  monopolies  of  the  U.S.  had  thrown  on  their 
economy. 

In  May  1957,  as  a  result  of  the  rebellion  of  the  people  of  Colombia,  the  hench- 
men  of  the   U.S.    monopolies.    Dictator   Pinilla,   was   overthrown.     Extremely 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  57 

characteristic  events  occurred  in  Venezuela.  In  1957,  on  the  initiative  of  the 
progressive  patriotic  forces  in  Venezuela,  the  "Patriotic  Junta"  was  established 
to  fight  against  the  bloody  regime  of  Jimenez.  The  representatives  of  the  bour- 
geois parties,  Democratic  Action,  the  Social-Christian  Party,  and  the  Republican- 
Democratic  Union  participated  in  the  "Junta."  Having  rallied  the  masses,  it 
called  a  general  strike  for  21  January  1958,  which  later  turned  into  an  armed 
revolt.  As  a  result  of  the  participation  of  the  working  class  and  students,  several 
groups  of  the  national  bourgeoisie  and  a  part  of  the  army  of  the  government  of 
Jimenez  were  deposed. 

The  forces  which  are  working  to  strengthen  national  independencies  and  democ- 
racy a^d  to  liberate  the  economy  of  these  countries  from  the  domination  of  the 
monopolies  of  the  U.S.  are  growing  in  Argentina,  Brazil,  Chile,  Uruguay,  and  other 
countries.  The  strength  of  these  forces  was  shown  by  the  failure  of  reactionary 
plans  and  of  the  reactionary  candidates  in  the  general  elections  in  Argentina. 
There  was  established  the  Front  of  People's  Action,  which  merged  the  national 
and  anti-imperialistic  forces  of  Chile:  the  Communist,  socialist,  and  democratic 
parties  and  the  labor  party.     A  People's  Front  was  organized  in  Brazil. 

An  important  characteristic  of  the  current  stage  of  the  liberation  struggle  in 
Latin  American  is  the  continually  increasing  role  of  the  working  class.  That  is, 
the  parti cipjation  of  the  working  class  imparts  to  the  national  liberation  movement 
in  Latin  America  a  clearly  marked  tintiimperialistic  character.  Earlier,  when  the 
question  of  state  power  was  decided  on  the  bases  of  armies  and  by  feudal-compra- 
dor circles,  one  dictator  was  replaced  by  another  dictator.  Thanks  to  the  partici- 
pation of  the  m.asses,  and  mainly  the  working  class,  the  overthrown  military 
dictators  were  replaced  by  bourgeois-parliamentary  regimes  offering  the  p>eople 
the  well-known  democratic  freedoms. 

Under  the  pressure  of  the  masses,  many  Latin  American  countries  began  more 
sharply  than  ever  to  demand  that  the  U.S.  look  into  the  character  of  the  economic 
relations  and  establish  just  prices  on  goods  exported  from  Latin  America  so  as  to 
protect  national  resources  from  encroachment  by  U.S.  monopolies.  The  Brazilian 
Congress  passed  a  law  nationalizing  the  reserves  of  atomic  materials  and  pro- 
hibiting their  export  from  the  country  and  canceling  a  secret  agreement  with  the 
U.S.  regarding  this  matter. 

The  conflicts  between  the  U.S.  and  Latin  American  countries  were  increased  in 
connection  with  the  crisis  which  started  in  the  U.S.  Seeking  to  get  out  of  crises, 
the  U.S.  raised  the  tariff  on  products  exported  by  the  Latin  American  countries 
and  began  to  dump  its  own  surplus  products  on  the  market  at  such  low  prices 
that  a  great  deal  of  damage  was  done  to  the  economy  of  the  Latin  American 
countries.  To  repulse  North  American  imp>erialism,  the  Latin  American  countries 
are  taking  several  measures  to  strengthen  mutual  relations  and  unity.  The 
attempts  of  the  U.S.  to  involve  the  Latin  American  countries  in  a  military  bloc, 
to  create  the  so-called  South  Atlantic  Pact,  have  failed. 

The  U.S.  still  holds  strong  positions  in  the  Latin  American  nations.  But  its 
prestige  grows  weaker  every  day.  The  Latin  AmeHcan  people  want  to  handle 
their  natural  resources  themselves  and  regulate  their  lives  without  interference 
from  outsiders.  The  fight  for  these  ideals  is  spreading  everywhere  and  has  already 
borne  its  first  fruit. 

Another  important  process  is  taking  place  side  by  side  with  the  liberation  from 
colonial  and  semicolonial  dependence — the  liberation  of  the  people  from  the  old 
slavish  ideology  which  imperialism  cultivated.  The  growth  of  national  conscious- 
ness is  taking  place  both  in  the  nations  which  are  tnrowing  off  the  foreign  yoke 
and  in  the  countries  fighting  against  the  colonizers.  The  Conference  for  Solidarity 
of  Asian  and  African  Countries  m  Canada  and  the  Afro- Asian  Writers  Conference 
held  in  Tashkent  pointed  this  out  very  clearly. 

«  Id  *  *  *  *  * 

In  recent  years,  the  influence  of  the  Communist  parties  in  the  countries  of  Latin 
America,  especially  Argentina,  Brazil,  Chile,  Uruguay,  Cuba,  Venezuela,  and 
Colombia,  has  been  growing  rapidly.  This  is  the  result  of  selfless  struggle  of 
Communists  for  the  development  of  the  national  liberation  and  democratic  move- 
ment. Since  the  end  of  1957,  15,000  persons  have  joined  the  Communist  Party 
of  Argentina  and  about  1,500  persons  the  Communist  Party  of  Uruguay.  The 
Communist  Party  of  Venezuela  emerged  from  underground  and  became  an  im- 
portant political  force  in  the  country.  Its  numbers  have  risen  to  20,000.  The 
creation  of  a  limited  Trade-Union  Center  of  Chilean  Workers  and  a  Popular  Front 
of  Chile  which  includes  all  leftist  parties  is  a  great  achievement  for  the  Communist 
Party  of  Chile.  The  authority  of  the  Communist  parties  has  grown  so  much  and 
their  role  in  the  national  liberation  movement  is  so  great  that  governing  circles 


58  COMAfUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

in  Latin  America  have  been  compelled  by  popular  pressures  to  change  laws  ban- 
ning the  Communist  Party,  or  to  actually  permit  them  to  einerge  from  the  uqderr 

ground. 

The  Communist  parties  of  Latin  American  countries  ever  more  closely  coordi- 
nate their  activities  in  the  struggle  against  the  common  enemy  of  the  Latin 
American  peoples— U.S.  imperialism.  This  contributes  to  the  further  activation 
of.  the  activities  of  the  21  Latui  American  Communist  parties  counting  in  their 
rauk.s  over  360,000  Comjnunists.. 

In  the  light  of  these  facts,  it  is  quite  obvious  how  deceitful  and  awkward  is  th'e 
noisy  new  campaign  of  imperialist  propaganda  on  "the  crisis  of  Communism." 
The  enemy,  citing  the  situation  which  has  arisen  in  pertain  European  Communist 
parties  and  the. fact  that  several  of  them  have  received  fewer  votes  in  elections, 
attempts  ty  show  that  the  entire  Communistmovement  is  allegedly  in  the  process 
of  being. weakened.     But  the  enemies  are  passing.off  i^e  desired  for  the  real. 

The  revolution.ary  movement  is  of  a  universal  iiature.  Its  main  support  is  the 
socialist  camp.  The  great  successes  of  the  pocialist  camp  are  thesuccesseS  of 
international  Communism. 

Now  when  the  entire  world  capitalist  system  is  ripe  lor  socialist  transformation, 
the  question  arises  once  again  of  the  development  of  the  world  revolutiorijjwy 
workers'  movement.  Now  this  moveaient  is  developing  on  a  much  wider  .front 
than  previously,  and  new  centers  of  the  revolutionary  movement  are  Constantlcv 
being  created. 

It  is  also  characteristic  tuat.  if  the  revolutionary  workers'  movement  does  not 
for  the  time  being  meet  wjth  such  great  success  in  certain  regions  of  the  world  as 
it  has  had  recently,  then  this  movement  will  grow  up  quickly  in  other  regions  of 
the  world.  Whereas  in  certain  old  capitalistic  countries — rin  countries  of  so-called 
classical  capitalism — the  bourgeoisie  and  its  right-socialist  accomplices  succeed  for 
the  time  being  in  deceiving  part  of  the  toilers,  including  the  workers,  then  in 
other  countries,  particularly  in  countries  of  the  East  and  Latin  America,  and  a 
number  of  *  *   * 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  I  show  you,  Mr.  Kornfeder,  an  article  from  World 
Marxist  Review  written  by  Rodney  Arismendi.  Is  this  also  a  part  of 
the  docuro.entation  to  which  you  refer? 

And,  while  showing  that  to  the  witness,  I  will  ask  Mr.  Mandel  to 
explain  what  the  World  Marxist  Review  is. 

Mr.  Mandel.  World  Marxist  Review  is  a  current  magazine  pub- 
lished by  the  Communists  and  Workers  Parties  of  the  World. 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Yes.  This  is  an  article  which  contains  the  main 
pieces  for  this  so-called  New  Deal  revolution  technique. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Do  you  know  who  the  author  of  that  article  is? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  I  know  him  by  reputation.  I  don't  know 
hrm  personally 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  What  is  his  reputation? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  he  is  a  known  Communist  theoretician. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  May  I. ask  that  this  also  go  in  the  record*^ 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  excerpt  from  World  Marxist  Review  follows:) 

[World  Marxist  Review,  May  1959] 

On  the  Role  op  the  National  Bourgeoisie  in  the  Anti-Imperialist 

Struggle 

{A  Study  of  the  Liberation  Movement  in  Latin  America) 

Rodney  Arismendi 

******* 

Of  the  many  themes  confronting  the  researcher  and  the  political  leader,  none, 
perhaps,  is  more  urgent  or  topical  than  that  of  defining  the  relation  between  the 
strategy  and  the  tactics  of  the  proletariat  in  the  Latin  American  revolution.  *  *  * 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  59 

We  have  in  vieWof  the  role  of  the  bourgeoisie  in  Latjn  America,  the  possibilities 
of  the  national  bourgeoisie  participating  in  the  patriotic  struggle  and  the  peculiari- 
ties of  this  participation,  as  well  as  the  attitude  of  the  proletariat  and  the  masses 
towards  the  conciliatory  big  bourgeoisie.  By  the  latter  we  mean  those  economic- 
ally powerful  groups  of  the  bourgeoisie  who,  although  they  have  not  sold  them- 
selves to  imperialism,  nevertheless  maintain  connections  with  it  and,  despite 
frequent  clashes,  try  to  come  to  terms,  first  and  foremost,  with  the  U.S.  monop- 
olies and  diplomats  to  the  detriment  of  their  own  people  and  country. 

The  national  bourgeoisie  undoubtedly  vacillate,  that  is  to  say,  are  conciliatory; 
but  their  national  interests  are  more  clearly  defined,  while  their  antagoisms  with 
imperi^ism  go  deeper  and,  hence,  predominate.  In  the  main,  the  concept  of 
"natioiia!  bourgeoisie"  coincides  with  that  of  the  middle,  chiefly  industrial, 
bourgeoisie. 

******* 

Two  events  at  the  beginning  of  1959  were  New  Year's  gifts  for  Wall  Street — the 
launching  of  the  Soviet  space  rocket — irrefutable  proof  of  the  socialist  world's 
strategic,  scientific  and  technological  superiority  over  capitalism;  and  the  triumph 
of  the  Cuban  patriots  who,  in  Marti's*  words,  imder  the  very  nose  of  the  monster, 
announced  that  a  new  phase  had  begun  in  the  struggle  on  the  continent.  For  the 
first  time  in  many  years,  with  the  possible  exception  of  Guatemala  in  the  last 
act  of  her  tragedy,  the  anti-imperialist  flag  flies  over  a  government  palace  in 
Latin  America.  And  although  the  rising  tide  has  not  reached  the  same  level 
everywhere,  can  anyone  doubt  that  the  Cuban  events  will  have  a  torrential 
impact  on  Latin  American  countries? 

*  *  *  !|e  *  *  * 

The  foreign  policy  pursued  by  the  Soviet  Union  and  the  socialist  countries, 
being  more  dynamic  and  elastic,  made  headway,  especially  after  the  XXth  Con- 
gress of  the  CPSU,  in  the  sphere  of  easing  international  tension;  moreover,  gen- 
erous proposals  have  been  made  to  deliver  industrial  equipment  and  establish 
broad  trade  relations  on  the  principle  of  equality  with  Latin  America,  too.  *  *  * 
******* 

Consequently,  the  cry  for  trade  with  the  Soviet  Union  and  all  thi  socialist  states, 
a  cry  that  springs  from  the  general  interests  of  the  Latin  American  countries,  is 
becoming,  strange  though  this  may  appear  at  first  glance,  one  of  the  most  insistent 
demands  on  the  continent.  The  constantly  growing  trade  with  the  socialist  camp 
eloquently  attests  to  this.  Yet  the  results  of  this  trade  fall  far  short  of  what  they 
could  be,  if  we  bear  in  mind  the  benefits  our  countries  derive  from  it  and  the 
enormous  losses  they  suffer  from  the  unequal  trade  forced  upon  us  by  imperialism 


II.    SOME    PROBLEMS    OF    THEORY    AND    PRACTICE    UNDER    DISCUSSION    IN 

LATIN    AMERICA 

The  role  of  the  national  bourgeoisie  is  of  course  determined  by  the  character  of 
our  eountries.  Lenin's  point  about  the  differences  between  a  revolution  jn-an 
imperialist  country  and  one  in  a  country  dependent  upon  imperialism  fully  retains 
its  validity.  The  imperialist  yoke,  particularly  North  American,  and  the-need  for 
a  solution  of  the  democratic  tasks  of  the  revolution,  primarily  the  agrarian  prob- 
lem, turns  the  national  bourgeoisie  into  one  of  the  factors  of  the  revolution,  ena- 
bling it  to  participate  in  the  democratic  front  of  national  liberation.  One  would 
think  that  there  is  no  difference  of  opinion  on  this  point. 

The  Chinese  revolution  was  a  classical  example  of  this,  just  as  Lenin's  tactics 
before  1905  provide  the  basis  for  the  contemporary  Marxist  teaching  on  the 
participation  by  and  the  leading  role  of  the  proletariat  in  the  bourgeois-democratic 
revolution.     Here,  truly,  we  have  a  reliable  compass. 

******* 

*  *  *  -phe  epic  events  in  Cuba,  in  themselves,  and  inasmuch  as  they  reflect 
the  deep-going  processes  maturing  in  many  countries,  signified  a  swing  to  the  Left 
and  have  influenced  the  thinking  and  the  policy  of  the  democratic  movement 
throughout  Latin  America. 

This  circumstance  confronts  the  masses,  not  only  from  the  viewpoint  of  propa- 
ganda but  also  of  practice,  with  the  task  of  establishing  democratic,  anti-imperialist 
unity.    The  Popular  Action  Front  in  Chile,  the  unity  of  the  people  in  Caracas,  and 


•  Jose  Marti,  ootstanding  Cuban  revolutionary  democrat  of  the  last  century. 


60  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

Other  examples,  testify  to  the  possibilities  for  bringing  about  deeper  changes  and 
for  achieving  closer  concerted  action  throughout  Latin  America.  *  *  * 

4t  *****  * 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Mr.  Kornfeder,  do  you  know  in  person  or  by  repu- 
tation Alfonso  Sanchez  Madariaga? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  I  did  not  hear  what  you  said. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Do  you  know  in  person  or  by  reputation  Alfonso 
Sanchez  Madariaga? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  I  know  him  by  reputation.  I  don't  know  him 
personally. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  offer  for  the  record  a  statement  by 
Alfonso  Sanchez  Madariaga. 

I  will  ask  the  witness  of  his  reputation.  What  do  you  know  of 
Mr.  Madariaga's  reputation? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  he  is  one  of  the  principal  leaders  in  Latin 
American  activities,  as  far  as  I  know. 

Senator  Keating.  In  Conmiimist  activities? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Yes. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  He  is  an  anti-Communist,  isn't  he? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  He  may  have  become  one. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Madariaga  is  active  in  the  executive  committee 
of  the  World  Economic  Conference  of  Free  Trade  Unions,  isn't  he? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Let  me  see  that  name  again.     I  didn't  get  it. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Let  me  give  you  this  article  and  see  if  you  can 
identify  the  man  who  wrote  it. 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Oh,  yes.  You're  right.  You're  right.  How- 
ever, I  just  don't  know  the  individual. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  This  article,  Mr.  Chairman,  appeared  originally  in 
the  Inter-American  Labor  Bulletin,  a  Mexican  newspaper,  and  it 
amounts  to  an  accusation  of  substantially  what  the  witness  has  now 
testified  to. 

I  ask  that,  not  as  proof  of  what  it  says,  but  as  an  illustration  that 
similar  things  are  being  said  by  anti-Communists  publicly,  that  it  go 
in  the  record. 

Senator  Keating.  It  may  be  received. 

Mr.  Sourwine.  Let  the  chairman  see  it. 

Senator  Keating.  I'm  not  sure  that  what  it  says  has  very  much 
pertinence,  but  it  will  be  received. 

(The  article  referred  to  follows :) 

[Inter-American  Labor  Bulletin,  June  1950] 

"I  ACCUSE" 

Statement  by  Alfonso  Sanchez  Madariaga 

ORIT  General  Secretary  Denounces  the  Scope  of  Soviet  Agent's  Activi- 
ties IN  Latin  America 

The  following  article  on  the  ''Aspects  of  the  Cold  War"  appeared  in  the  well 
known  Mexico  City  daily,  Novedades,  in  its  edition  of  April  23,  1959: 

"Throughout  the  countries  of  Latin  America,  the  Soviet  plot  against  democratic 
institutions,  the  reorganization  and  expansion  of  our  economies  and  the  normal 
development  of  the  free  trade  union  organizations  is  well  underway  and,  according 
to  the  plans  of  its  instigators,  will  reacli  its  fullest  development  during  the  months 
of  May  and  June." 

^  With  these  words  the  ORIT  General  Secretary  began  his  exclusive  statement  for 
Novedades  on  Wednesday,  April  22.  Mr.  Alfonso  Sanchez  Madariaga  continued 
as  follows: 


COMMUNIST    THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  61 

"Both  the  International  Confederation  of  Free  Trade  Unions  (ICFTU)  and  its 
inter-American  branch,  the  ORIT,  have  for  some  time  past  been  denouncing  the 
plans  to  upset  economic  world  stabilization  in  governments  where  democracy  and 
freedom  are  fully  guaranteed  which  have  been  drawn  up  in  Moscow  by  the  despots 
of  the  Kremlin  as  a  fundamental  part  of  their  anti-Western  strategy.  The 
ICFTU  has  pointed  out,  in  statements  made  by  its  General  Secretary,  its  Execu- 
tive Committee  and  at  the  World  Economic  Conference  of  Free  Trade  Unions  at 
Geneva  in  March  how  the  agents  of  the  USSR,  attempting  to  infiltrate  in  demo- 
cratic institutions  and  in  labor  circles  in  the  Americas,  Asia,  Africa,  the  Middle 
East  and  certain  countries  of  Western  Europe,  try  to  prevent  the  peaceful  evolu- 
tion of  all  free  countries  and,  in  the  former  colonial  areas,  the  political,  social  and 
economic  development  of  natioi  s  which  have  only  recently  conquered  their  inde- 
pendence. We  are  dealing  with  an  offensive  of  universal  proportions  which  tends 
to  undermine  the. political  and  economic  bases  of  true  democracy  throughout  the 
entire  world.  Such  action  is  in  keeping  with  Russia's  attitude  on  Western  Berlin. 
We  are  witnessing  an  attack  similar  to  that  which  the  Kremlin  launched  against 
the  economic  and  political  reconstruction  of  Western  Europe  in  the  Marshall  Plan 
era.  The  tactics  are  always  the  same:  to  confuse  the  masses  and  incite  them  to 
subversion  and  disorder  in  order  to  hinder  governmental  action  and  dislocate  the 
process  of  economic  reorganization  and  expansion  in  the  West.  The  final  goal  is 
the  implantation  of  Communist  or  pro-Communist  regimes  under  Moscow  domi- 
nation in  as  many  countries  as  possible.' 

THE    CONSPIRACY    IN   LATIN    AMERICA 

"In  Latin  America,"  the  inter-American  trade  union  leader  added,  "the 
conspiracy  is  carried  out  in  a  methodical  fashion.  It  was  revealed  in  Mexico, 
thanks,  on  the  one  hand,  to  the  vigilant  action  of  the  free  trade  movement,  and, 
on  the  other,  to  the  determination  of  President  Lopez  Mateos'  regime  to  defend 
our  institutions  and  our  democratic  way  of  life.  The  Soviet  plot  against  inter- 
American  democracy,  against  the  peaceful  evolution  of  our  economic  systems  and 
against  the  power  and  unity  of  the  free  trade  unions  which  are  the  foundation  and 
bulwark  of  modern  democracy  is  gaining  momentum  just  at  the  time  when  pro- 
grams such  as  the  inter-American  Development  Bank,  the  Latin  American  Com- 
mon Market,  the  'Panamerican  Operation'  of  President  Kubitschek,  etc.,  are 
about  to  take  shape.  Antieconomic  strikes  are  organized  on  the  fringe  of  respon- 
sible trade  union  jurisdiction.  Attempts  are  made  at  preventing  the  solid  estab- 
lishment of  true  democracy  in  countries  such  as  Colombia,  Peru,  Chile  and 
Argentina.  Artifical  conflicts  are  created  in  Venezuela  in  order  to  harry  the 
activities  of  a  constitutional  government,  honestly  elected  by  the  people,  like  that 
headed  by  President  Romub  Betancourt.  An  offensive  is  launched  to  create  con- 
fusion among  Latin  American  workers,  turning  them  away  from  the  path  of  free 
trade  unionism  by  false  arguments.  Caracas  has  been  chosen  as  the  center  of 
these  maneuvers  against  the  ORIT  and  its  affiliated  organizations  in  our  21  re- 
pubhcs,  the  Caribbean  and  Canada,  covered  by  the  liberties  which  now  exist  in 
the  Venezuelan  nation,  which  is  a  model,  in  this  hemisphere,  of  civic  progress 
from  the  most  abject  dictatorship  to  the  finest  type  of  democracy. 

FOREIGN    COMMUNIST    LEADERS    SET   TARGETS 

"In  the  trade  union  field  the  conspiracy  began  in  February  in  Santiago  de 
Chile  at  a  certain  so-called  third  regular  national  conference  of  what  claims  to 
be  a  national  labor  center  but  which,  masked  by  a  false  neutralism,  has  lent  itself 
as  a  focus  of  the  Soviet  plot  against  our  liberties  and  against  inter-Latin  American 
economic  progress.  Those  who  participated  in  that  meeting  included  such  notori- 
ous international  agitators  as  the  Yugoslavians,  Stane  Kavic  and  Stane  Yuznic; 
well-known  agents  of  Russian  imperialism  in  our  countries  such  as  the  Uru- 
guayans Mario  Acosta  and  Rosario  Pietroroia;  the  Mexican,  Antonio  Garcia 
Morena  (one  of  Lombardo  Toledano's  lieutenants);  the  Chilean,  Clotario  Blest; 
and  other  professional  subversionists  in  Latin  America.  Later  the  Russian 
pseudo-trade  union  leaders,  Timofei  Eremev  and  Minev  Aleixev  arrived  at  the 
capital  of  Chile.  It  was  agreed  at  that  time  to. intensify  the  grand  offensive 
against  the  free  trade  unions  of  this  hemisphere,  against  the  development  of  our 
national  and  hemispheric  programs  for  economic  expansion  and,  especially,  against 
democracy  in  the  hemisphere.  Since  Mexico  is  at  the  present  time  one  of  the 
most  stable  nations  in  Latin  America  from  the  political  and  economic  standpoints, 
and  since  the  obvious  intention  was  to  counteract  the  effects  of  the  Eisenhower- 
Lopez   Mateos  interview  in  Acapulco,  this  country  was  chosen  as  one  of  the 

66492  O  -  61  -3 


62  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

targets  of  the  general  destructive  action.  Now  the  flames  are  spreading  through- 
out all  of  Latin  America.  The  CTAL  is  distributing  circulars  requesting  infor- 
mations of  an  economic,  political  and,  to  a  certain  degree,  military  nature  with 
the  evident  intention  of  transmitting  such  reports  to  the  Moscovite  chiefs  of 
Mr.  Lombardo  Toledano.  The  strikes  are  multiplying,  not  to  defend  the 
legitimate  interests  of  the  workers  but  to  weaken  the  democratic  systems  of 
government  and  the  prestige  of  the  free  trade  unionism  leaders  who,  by  their 
honest  and  efficient  actions  over  the  years,  have  shown  that  they  know  how  to 
serve  the  interests  of  those  whom  they  represent  and,  at  the  same  time,  cooperate 
with  the  other  social  forces  and  with  the  progressive  governments  to  achieve  a 
general  improvement  in  the  economic  and  social  standards  of  our  nations. 
Naturally,  this  destructive,  anti-patriotic  enterprise  frequently  obtains  coopera- 
tion from  the  most  reactionary  of  forces,  the  last  remnants  of  colonialism,  and  the 
partisans  of  classic  Creole  militarism."  ^ 

SOLEMN    APPEAL   FROM   THE    GRIT 

"The  ORIT,"  continued  Mr.  Sanchez  Madariaga,  "makes  a  solemn  appeal  to 
public  opinion  on  this  hemisphere,  to  the  workers  and  to  the  democratic  govern- 
ments of  the  Americas  on  the  eve  of  the  celebration  of  May  Day.  The  political, 
social,  and  economic  democracy  in  our  hemisphere  must  be  alert.  An  attempt 
to  take  advantage  of  this  Labor  Day  to  advance  the  Communist  conspiracy 
against  our  hemisphere  one  step  further  is  planned.  The  city  of  Caracas  has 
been  selected  as  the  site  of  this  attempt.  The  conspirators  who  plotted  in  Santi- 
ago de  Chile  in  February  propose  to  establish  in  the  capital  of  democratic  Vene- 
zuela in  May  the  bases  for  a  new  'independent'  Latin  American  labor  center. 
The  idea  was  born  in  Moscow.  The  plan  is  to  disassociate  the  workers  of  Latin 
America  from  their  brothers  in  the  United  States  and  Canada  in  order  to  employ 
them  better  in  the  service  of  the  foreign  policy  of  the  Soviet  empire.  Such  is,  in 
brief,  the  scope  of  the  operation.  We  know  for  a  fact  that  neither  the  democratic 
government  of  Dr.  Betancourt  nor  the  authentic  free  trade  union  movement  in 
Venezuela  wish  to  favor  this  extravagant  design.  The  hemispheric  forces  of  free 
trade  unionism,  more  united  than  ever  before,  are  preparing  to  resist  the  offensive. 
But  a  clear  and  forceful  statement  must  be  made.  My  obligation  as  leader  of 
the  democratic  trade  union  movement  in  this  hemisphere  is  to  make  a  public 
revelation  of  this  conspiracy.  No  individual,  no  organization  imbued  with  the 
ICFTU  and  the  ORIT  policy  of  a  determined  defense  of  the  rights  and  interests 
of  the  workers  and  of  public  freedoms — without  which  trade  union  action  is  im- 
possible— can  or  should  lend  any  assistance  to  the  Communist  game  which,  at 
this  moment  in  the  cold  war,  on  the  eve  of  the  summit  conference  on  Berlin  and 
Germany — constant  motives  for  uncertainty  in  the  post-war  world — ^pursues  the 
breakdown  of  Western  societies  in  favor  of  the  expansionist  and  imperialist  policy 
of  the  Soviet  Union." 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  There  is  one  more  item  to  show  this  witness,  and 
this  an  article  also  from  the  World  Marxist  Review  on  the  30th 
anniversary  of  the  first  conference  of  the  Communist  Parties  of  Latin 
America,  by  Paulino  Gonzales  Alberdi. 

Are  you  familiar  with  Mr.  Alberdi  personally  or  by  reputation? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Only  by  reputation, 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Can  you  say  whether  this  article  represents  the 
Communist  viewpouit? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Oh,  yes,  definitely.  I  read  it,  and  you  have  here 
on  page  54,  he  is  here  writing  about  a  conference  of  Communist 
Parties  in  Latin  America,  and  he  says  that  the  conference  is  "taking 
its  stand  on  the  Leninist  thesis  of  the  Bourgeois-Democratic  Revolu- 
tion," for  South  America. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  That  also  will  be  offered  for  the  record. 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  follows:) 


COMMXJNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  63 

[World  Marxist  Review,  July  1959] 

Thirtieth  Anniversary  of  the  First  Conference  of  the  Communist  Parties 

OF  Latin  America 

(Paulino  Gonzales  Alberdi) 

In  June  1929  representatives  of  the  Communist  parties  of  Latin  America 
assembled  in  Buenos  Aires  for  the  first  time  to  discuss  problems  of  the  liberation 
movement  in  their  countries.*  Contacts  between  the  parties  had  been  extended 
and  some  experiences  exchanged  before  this  meeting  took  place. 

Delegations  from  the  Communist  parties  or  groups  of  Argentina,  Brazil, 
Bolivia,  Venezuela,  Guatemala,  Colombia,  Cuba,  Mexico,  Panama,  Paraguay, 
Peru,  Salvador,  Uruguay  and  Ecuador,  and  representatives  of  the  Communist 
International,  Young  Communist  League  International  and  the  Communist 
parties  of  the  USA  and  France  attended. 

Police  action  stopped  the  Chilean  delegation  headed  by  Elias  LaflFerte,  the 
present  Chairman  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Chile,  from  crossing  the  border, 
while  a  serious  illness,  which  a  few  months  later  ended  in  his  death,  prevented 
Jos6  Carlos  Mariategui,  notable  Communist  intellectual  in  Peru,  from  being 
present.  However,  he  sent  his  theses  which  were  read  at  one  of  the  meetings. 
Ill  health  also  prevented  Rodolfo  Ghioldi,  a  leading  member  of  the  Communist 
Party  of  Argentina,  from  attending.  The  conference  rendered  homage  to  the 
victims  of  reaction,  among  whom  were  Julio  Antonio  Mella,  leader  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  of  Cuba,  and  Guadalupe  Rodriguez,  leader  of  the  Mexican  Com- 
munist Party. 

The  following  were  the  main  questions  discussed: 

The  international  situation  of  Latin  America  and  the  threat  of  war;  anti- 
imperialist  struggle  and  the  tactics  of  the  Communist  parties  of  Latin  America; 
activities  of  the  Anti-Imperialist  Leagues;  trade  unions;  the  peasant  question; 
the  race  problem  in  Latin  America;  the  Young  Communist  League  movement; 
work  among  women;  problems  of  Party  building. 

The  coiifen-iice  made  a  valuable  contribution  to  the  building  and  development 
of  the  Latin  American  Communist  parties.  It  represented  a  considerable  step 
forward  in  coordinating  their  efforts  and  clarifying  their  points  of  view  on  problems 
which  called  for  the  application  of  the  general  principles  of  Marxism-Leninism 
with  due  regard  to  the  national  peculiarities  of  each  country.  No  class  or  social 
section  had  hitherto  succeeded  in  rallying  the  spokesmen  of  the  majority  of  the 
exploited  and  oppressed  peoples  of  Latin  America  with  a  view  to  coordinating 
their  struggle  against  the  oppressors,  and  against  the  foreign  imperialists.  This 
historical  mission  fell  to  the  lot  of  the  working  class  and  its  Communist  vanguard. 

The  conference  was  called  upon  to  give  ideological  and  organizational  help  in 
building  the  Communist  parties  so  that  they  could  lead  the  developing  anti- 
imperialist  struggle  to  victory. 

The  workers  and  people  could  not  achieve  victory  under  the  leadership  of  the 
reformist  trade  unions  associated  with  imperialism  through  the  U.S.  Right-wing 
trade  union  bosses  and  the  Amsterdam  Trade  Union  International.  The  people 
could  not  do  so  under  the  leadership  of  the  corrupt  anarchist  organizations,  nor 
under  the  leadership  of  bourgeois  or  petty-bourgeois  parties,  such  as  the  Liberals 
in  Colombia  or  the  Aprists  in  Peru,  who  sought  to  come  to  terms  with  imperialism 
or  else  placed  their  hopes  not  in  the  people,  but  in  the  victory  of  one  imperialist 
power  over  another.  Nor  could'  the  Right-wing  Socialist  leaders,  who  denied 
that  imperialist  rule  in  our  countries  was  of  a  colonial  character  and  advocated  a 
pro-imperialist  policy,  lead  the  people  to  victory.  Only  the  Communist  parties 
could  do  this  successfully.  Only  they,  guided  by  scientific  Marxist-Leninist 
theory,  could  carry  on  the  best  traditions  of  their  people,  and  solve  the  tasks 
confronting  them. 

The  Great  October  Socialist  Revolution  and  the  international  Communist 
movement  had  a  great  ideological  and  political  impact  on  the  working  people  of 
Latin  America  and  this  was  a  decisive  factor  in  the  founding  of  the  Communist 
parties.  In  some  countries,  Argentina  for  example,  Marxist-Leninist  literature 
such  as  V.  I.  Lenin's  "The  State  and  Revolution  and  Imperialism,  the  Highest 
Stage  of  Capitalism,"  was  popularized. 

'As  a  member  of  the  Argentine  delegation  the  author  reported  at  this  meeting  on  the  work  of  the  Antl* 

Imperialist  Leagues. 


64  COMMUNIST   THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

At  the  end  of  the  192()'s  the  Communists  in  Latin  America  were  not  yet  suffi- 
ciently experienced.  It  is  true  that  the  Communist  parties  of  Argentina,  Uruguay 
and  Brazil  had  several  years  of  struggle  behind  them  and  had  accumulated  a 
certain  amount  of  organizational  and  ideological  experience,  but  their  links  with 
the  workers  in  big  factories  were  still  very  weak.  Reaction  was  delivering  hard 
blows  at  the  Communist  parties  of  Chile,  Cuba  and  Mexico.  At  the  same  time, 
in  view  of  their  ideology  and  organizational  structure  some  of  the  parties  could 
not,  strictly  speaking,  be  termed  Communist  parties.  A  number  were  only 
groups  whose  activities  were  confined  to  communist  propaganda  in  trade  union 
organizations. 

STRATEGIC  TASKS 

At  the  conference  the  Latin  American  Communists  began  an  exhaustive  study 
of  the  vital  problems  affecting  their  countries.  The  socioeconomic  structure  of 
the  Latin  American  countries  was  analyzed,  and  the  effects  ot  imperialist  rule 
and  of  the  latifundist  character  of  agriculture  exposed.  In  the  light  of  the 
decisions  adopted  at  the  Vlth  Congress  of  the  Comintern,  the  conference  noted 
the  typical  features  of  the  relative  stabilization  of  capitalism  and  its  repercussions 
in  the  Latin  American  countries.  Capitalist  "rationalization"  signified  greater 
exploitation  of  the  working  people  (for  instance,  the  saltpeter  mines  in  Chile,  the 
meatpacking  plants  in  Argentina  and  Uruguay).  Unemployment  grew.  The 
United  States  introduced  import  duties  which  meant  that  fewer  raw  materials 
were  purchased  from  Latin  America  and  export  prices  fell.  The  workers  and 
peasants  retaliated  by  strikes  and  other  protest  actions  which  at  times  took  on  an 
insurrectional  character.     These  actions  were  brutally  suppressed. 

The  Communists  discussed  the  lessons  drawn  from  the  strike  at  the  United 
Fruit  Company's  banana  plantations  in  Colombia,  where  hundreds  of  strikers 
were  killed  ancl  the  United  States  threatened  armed  intervention. 

In  its  analysis  of  Latin  American  conditions  the  conference  stressed  the  fact 
that  during  the  First  World  War  ligh't  industry  had  developed  in  most  of  our 
countries.  This  had  led  to  the  growth  of  the  working  class  and  increased  the  role 
played  by  the  national  bourgeoisie.  The  national  and  petty  bourgeoisie  sought  to 
win  the  leadership  of  the  masses.  They  pursued  a  twofold  aim:  to  gain  conces- 
sions for  themselves  from  the  imperialists  and  landowners  and  to  prevent  the  rise 
of  Communist  parties,  to  prevent  the  proletariat  from  leading  the  struggle  waged 
by  the  masses.  With  a  view  to  achieving  their  aims  certain  petty-bourgeois 
parties  declared  themselves  adherents  of  Marxism  and  friends  of  the  Soviet  Union, 
while  at  the  same  time  they  fought  against  the  Latin  American  Communists. 

Having  won  a  majority  vote,  the  industrial  and  petty  bourgeoisie  came  to  power 
in  a  number  of  countries.  But  they  immediately  capitulated  to  imperialism  or 
else  were  overthrown  by  reactionary  military  coups.  Reaction  at  first  applied 
the  methods  used  by  the  Italian  fascists.  In  Chile,  for  example,  the  dictator 
Ibanez,  by  combining  repression  with  demagogy  and  insignificant  concessions, 
gained  influence  in  the  trade  union  movement. 

Yankee  imperialism's  offensive  against  the  Latin  American  economy  and  the 
efforts  of  the  British  imperialists  to  maintain  their  positions  found  expression  in 
coups  d'6tat,  in  artificially  provoked  conflicts  and  wars  between  the  countries  of 
Latin  America.  Yankee  imperialism  used  the  liberal  parties  to  bring  pressure  to 
bear  upon  conservative  governments  associated  with  British  imperialism  and,  by 
resorting  to  blackmail,  obtained  the  concessions  and  government  changes  it 
wanted. 

The  conference  demonstrated  the  worthlessness  of  the  assertions  that  imperial- 
ism in  general,  and  U.S.  imperialism  in  particular,  was  progressive,  and  that  it 
developed  the  economy  of  backward  countries.  It  called  for  action  against  im- 
perialism and  pointed  out  that  the  revolution  in  the  Latin  American  countries  at 
that  stage  would  not  be  a  socialist  revolution,  but  an  agrarian  and  anti-imperialist 
revolution.  For  the  revolution  to  triumph,  the  decision  stated,  a  broad  national- 
liberation  front  under  the  leadership  of  the  working  class  and  its  Communist 
parties  was  needed. 

Taking  its  stand  on  the  Leninist  thesis  of  the  bourgeois-democratic  revolution, 
the  conference  opened  up  broad  vistas  before  the  Communist  movement  in  Latin 
America;  in  this  respect  the  documents  of  the  Communist  International  played  an 
important  part.  It  rejected  the  stand  adopted  by  some  of  the  delegates  who 
•opposed  the  formation  of  Communist  parties — the  political  parties  of  the  prole- 
tariat. These  delegates  alleged  that  a  party  built  on  a  broader  socio-political 
base  would  be  able  to  parry  the  blows  of  reaction.  The  subsequent  experience 
of  such  so-called  "broad"  parties  in  a  number  of  countries  demonstrated  that  they 
only  isolated  the  class-conscious  section  of  the  workers,  and  assisted  the  seizure  of 
the  leadership  of  the  working-class  movement  by  the  reformists. 


COMMUNIST   THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  65 

ACTION    FOR   PEACE 

The  conference  drew  attention  to  the  need  for  action  against  the  imperialist 
war  danger.  In  his  report  on  this  question  Victorio  Codovilla  spoke  of  the  tasks 
that,  in  the  light  of  the  international  situation,  would  confront  the  Marxist- 
Leninist  parties  should  their  countries  be  drawn  into  a  war  against  the  Soviet 
Union,  or  into  a  war  between  the  imperialist  states. 

If  the  imperialists  provoked  a  war  between  the  Latin  American  countries,  the 
report  stated,  the  Communist  parties  should  rouse  the  masses  against  the  govern- 
ments responsible  for  the  conflict,  organize  fraternization,  linking  it  up  with  the 
tasks  of  national  hberation  and  the  movement  for  radical  social  and  democratic 
transformations.  It  was  at  this  time  that  the  long-drawn-out  war  between 
Bolivia  and  Paraguay  broke  out :  its  underlying  cause  was  the  struggle  between  the 
North  American  and  British  oil  trusts  for  the  oil  deposits  in  the  Chaco  region. 
The  capitalist  and  landlord  groups  in  Brazil  and  Argentina,  with  imperialist 
contacts,  played  a  part  in  this  conflict. 

The  young  Communist  groups  of  Bolivia  and  Paraguay  were  severely  criticized 
for  having  taken  an  opportunist  line  on  this  war.  It  shorJd  be  said  that  these 
groups  later  took  steps  to  rectify  their  mistakes;  for  instance,  the  Paraguayan 
comrades  expelled  Ibarrola,  one  of  their  leaders,  for  his  pro-imperiftlL«;t  policy. 

The  antiwar  activities  of  the  Communist  parties  mobilized  the  people  and 
helped  to  force  the  imperialists  and  their  satellite  governments  to  end  the  Chaco 
war  which  for  them  had  been  highly  profitable.  Influenced  by  these  activities, 
well-known  workers  leaders  from  anarchist  organizations  in  Paraguay,  Bolivia, 
Argentina,  and  other  countries  and  some  of  the  leaders  of  the  petty  bourgeois  anti- 
imperialist  movement  joined  the  Communist  parties. 

The  conference  noted  that  the  Communists  acted  correctly  in  supporting  the 
armed  uprising  of  the  Nicaraguan  patriots  under  the  leadership  of  Sandino  against 
the  North  American  interventionists. 

QUESTIONS    OF   TACTICS   AND    PARTY   BUILDING 

Working-class  unity  and  the  question  of  drawing  into  the  anti-imperialist  move- 
ment the  many  allies  of  the  proletariat  were  discussed  in  detail. 

The  conference  was  in  favor  of  forming  a  national-liberation  front  uniting  the 
different  classes  under  working-class  and  Communist  Party  leadership.  This 
would  guarantee  success.  The  speeches  of  some  comrades  showed  that  they  did 
not  fully  appreciate  the  need  for  allies,  but  many  others  criticized  the  under- 
estimation of  the  petty  and  national  bourgeois  as  possible  allies  of  the  proletariat. 
Eventually  this  question  was  clarified  and  it  was  decided  to  encourage  and  extend 
the  anti-imperialist  leagues  to  form  a  united  anti-imperialist  front. 

On  the  trade  union  question  the  conference  proclaimed  enthusiastic  support  for 
the  Congress  which  had  taken  place  not  long  before  in  Montevideo  and  founded 
the  Confederation  of  the  Working  People  of  Latin  America.  It  summarized  the 
experience  of  the  struggle  and  stressed  the  need  to  organize  the  working  class 
into  trade  unions,  particularly  those  workers  employed  in  the  big  factories  and  in 
the  basic  industries.  The  conference  exposed  the  disruptive  role  of  the  Right- 
wing  leaders  of  the  American  Federation  of  Labor  and  the  Amsterdam  Trade 
Union  International  in  the  Latin  American  working-class  movement.  The  Com- 
munists in  our  countries  supported  militant  working-class  unity. 

Erroneous  views  held  by  some  comrades  were  not  sufRciently  criticized.  They 
agreed  that  the  attention  of  the  Party  should  be  centered  on  the  big  factories, 
where  the  proletariat  was  most  exploited,  but  affirmed  at  the  same  time  that  the 
"really  revolutionary  classes  were  the  agricultural  laborers  and  the  exploited 
landless  peasants."  "The  workers  in  the  cities,"  they  declared,  "by  virtue  of 
their  more  privileged  position  and  their  European  orientation,  are  an  easier  prey 
to  the  influence  of  petty-bourgeois  reformist  and  progovernment  ideology  or  the 
pseudo-revolutionary  demagogy  of  anarchism  and  anarcho-syndicalism."  These 
assertions  ignored  the  truism  that  the  industrial  proletariat  is,  by  its  very  nature, 
the  most  revolutionary  class  in  modern  society.  True,  there  were  sections  of 
artisans  in  the  towns  with  a  tendency  towards  anarchism,  and  privileged  cate- 
gories of  workers  with  reformist  sentiments.  But  the  growth  of  the  big  factories 
and  the  shift  of  the  masses  to  the  Left  reduced  the  strength  of  these  sections. 
Furthermore,  certain  delegates  wrongly  characterized  our  large  cities  as  "parasitic 
cities,"  forgetting  that  not  only  the  parasitic  landlords  and  big  capitalists,  mer- 
chant-middlemen, big  officials,  high-ranking  officers  and  clericals  lived  there,  but 
also  the  industrial  proletariat,  which  was  not  an  artificial  product  but  the  result 
of  economic  evolution. 


66  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

An  analysis  was  made,  during  the  discussion  on  the  agrarian  question,  of  the 
various  forms  of  exploitation  of  the  peasants  in  Latin  American  countries  with 
their  remnants  of  feudalism  (which  to  a  large  extent  still  obtain).  The  different 
conditions  of  the  peasants  in  the  various  Latin  American  countries  and  of  the 
sections  of  the  peasantry  in  one  and  the  same  country  were  brought  out.  The 
conference  advanced  demands  which  reflected  the  aspirations  of  Vjroad  sections 
of  the  peasantry.  It  was  proposed  to  organize  joint  action  by  the  peasants  and 
agricultural  laborers.  The  experience  of  the  peasant  leagues  in  Mexico  and  the 
worker-peasant  blocs  which  functioned  in  several  countries  was  summarized. 

During  the  discussion  on  racial  discriminaton,  the  conference  dealt  with  the 
socio-economic  content  of  the  Indian  and  Negro  problems  and  criticized  the  theory 
of  the  racial  inferiority  of  the  Indians  and  Negroes.  Those  who,  in  their  defense 
of  the  Indians  and  Negroes,  reduced  the  problem  to  one  of  education,  were  also 
criticized. 

The  conference  called  upon  the  Communist  parties  to  pay  more  attention  to  the 
wom.en's  movement  and  that  of  the  youth,  to  their  demands,  and  to  help  in 
organizing  Communist  youth. 

Some  delegations,  who  leaned  toward  spontaneity  in  the  communist  movement, 
asserted  that  the  lack  of  a  traditional  background  in  Latin  America  ruled  out  the 
possibility  of  organizing  the  masses,  of  their  being  willing  to  pay  regular  dues,  and 
so^forth.  The  conference  rejected  this  view  and  pointed  out  that  it  was  precisely 
reliance  on  spontaneity  and  disregard  of  organizational  questions  which  made  for 
defeat.  The  discussion  on  Party  building  noted  that  democratic  centralism  and 
the*'system  of  factory  branches  and  branches  in  residential  areas  were  the  main 
factors  in  the  organizational  work  of  the  parties.  Most  of  the  Communist  parties 
represented  at  the  conference  had  not  yet  formed  such  branches. 

The  conference  resolutions  pointed  out  the  inevitable  deterioration  in  the  eco- 
nomic situation  in  Latin  America,  a  growth  of  social  struggles  and  of  conflicts 
between  the  imperialists,  of  political  instability,  repression  and  the  threat  of  war. 
In  this  the  conference  proceeded  from  the  decisions  of  the  Vlth  Congress  of  the 
Communist  International.  Some  comrades  drew  the  wrong  conclusions  from 
this  and  advocated  as  the  "task  of  the  day"  the  seizure  of  power  by  the  working 
class  in  alliance  with  the  peasants.  These  comrades  saw  no  difference  between  a 
big  strike  and  the  seizure  of  power.  Worship  of  spontaneity  resulted  in  neglecting 
the  work  of  organizing  and  politically  educating  the  masses,  in  underrating  the 
importance  of  building  strong  Communist  parties. 

Shortly  afterward,  the  most  acute  economic  crisis  known  to  capitalism  set  in. 
Carrying  out  its  first  five-year  plan,  the  Soviet  Union  was  in  the  meantime 
successfully  building  socialism.  During  the  years  of  crisis  and  new  revolutionary 
upsurge,  the  Communists  of  Latin  America  were  subjected  to  persecution  and 
terror.  Sectarian  and  dogmatic  tendencies  grew  under  these  difficult  conditions, 
particularly  with  regard  to  the  question  of  forming  political  alliances.  In  over- 
coming these  shortcomings  the  Latin  American  Communists  were  greatly  helped 
by  the  .speeches  of  G.  Dimitrov  to  the  Nazi  tribunal,  the  decisions  of  the  Vllth 
Congress  of  the  Communist  International  and  the  experience  of  the  Popular 
Front  in  France  and  Spain.  The  experiences  of  the  Chinese  liberation  movement, 
although  it  had  many  specific  features  arismg  out  of  the  national  peculiarities  of 
the  country,  were  also  helpful  to  the  Latin  American  Communists.  Summarizing 
the  experience  of  the  struggles  waged  by  the  masses  under  working-class  leadership 
for  peace,  democracy,  national  independence  and  higher  living  standards,  the 
Communist  International  played  a  big  part  in  awakening  and  uniting  the  Latin 
American  peoples.  The  Communist  parties,  heading  the  struggle  of  the  people, 
resisted  the  offensive  of  reaction. 

Today,  30  years  after  the  First  Conference  of  the  Communist  parties  of  Latin 
America,  we  see  clearly  what  a  glorious  path  our  movement  has  traversed.  Social 
development  has  given  birth  to  Communist  parties  in  countries  where,  in  the 
thirties,  only  small  groups  of  Communists  functioned.  Courageously  and  de- 
votedly defending  the  interests  of  the  masses,  upholding  independence  and  peace, 
and  championing  the  great  cause  of  socialism,  these  parties  are  winning  the  con- 
fidence of  the  workers,  peasants  and  other  sections  of  the  people.  And  they  are 
succeeding  because  they  are  guided  by  Marxist- Leninist  principles. 

The  working  class  in  the  Latin  American  countries  is  firmly  stepping  out  onto 
the  path  charted  by  the  Communist  parties.  In  Argentina,  for  example,  tens  of 
thousands  of  workers  formerly  under  Peronist  influence,  have  joined  the  Com- 
munist Party.  The  policy  of  trade  union  and  working-class  unity  guarantees 
the  Party  the  support  of  the  masses.  The  Chilean  working  people  highly  appre- 
ciate the  efforts  of  the  Communists  who  have  done  so  much  to  build  a  single 
trade  union  center. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  67 

Through  their  consistent  anti-imperialist  struggle  and  selfless  defense  of  the 
nations'  interests,  the  Communists  have  attracted  to  their  parties  the  most  sincere 

Eatriots,  people  from  among  the  nationalist  and  democratic  sections.  When 
uiz  Carlos  Prestes  and  his  fellow-fighters  from  the  legendary  column  joined  the 
party  this  was  an  event  of  great  importance.  Outstanding  intellectuals  have 
also  joined  our  ranks. 

Political  and  organizational  levels  differ  among  the  Communist  parties  of  Latin 
America.  Nevertheless,  as  they  point  out  in  their  documents,  their  influence  on 
the  masses  is  not  yet  to  be  measured  by  their  numerical  strength.  They  all  note 
the  backwardness  of  the  work  in  the  countryside  and  are  taking  steps  to  over- 
come this  shortcoming.  Our  task  is  clear:  we  must  speed  up  the  growth  of  the 
Communist  Party. 

Latin  America  is  today  an  arena  of  struggle  against  imperialism  and  the  dic- 
tators who  serve  it;  the  Cuban  victory  is  a  graphic  expression  of  this  struggle. 

The  working  class  and  peoples  of  Latin  America  have  been  ruled  by  many 
governments  in  these  past  few  years,  yet  the  exploitation  and  poverty  of  the 
masses  is  on  the  increase,  inasmuch  as  the  imperialists,  particularly  those  of  North 
America,  are  making  our  peoples  shoulder  the  burden  of  their  economic  difficulties. 
It  is  noteworthy  that,  whereas  at  the  First  Conference  of  Latin  American  Com- 
munist Parties  the  delegates  spoke  of  the  demonstrations  of  protest  against  the 
visit  to  Latin  America  of  Hoover,  at  that  time  President  of  the  United  States,  the 
■whole  world  today  knows  of  the  mass  protest  aroused  by  the  visit  of  Nixon,  Vice 
President  of  the  United  States.  The  strike  movement  has  grown,  particularly  in 
Argentina,  Mexico,  Uruguay,  Brazil,  and  Chile.  In  this  way  the  working  class  is 
repulsing  the  imperialist  monopolies  (mainly  North  American)  which,  acting 
through  various  channels,  particularly  through  the  International  Monetary  Fund, 
are  endeavoring  to  lower  still  further  the  working  people's  standard  of  living. 
Workers,  peasants,  students,  and  other  sections  of  the  population  are  advancing 
economic  and  political  demands  and  fighting  for  independence  against  their  chief 
enemy — U.S.  imperialism. 

The  workers  and  other  sections  are  beginning  to  understand  that  there  is  no 
other  way  to  solve  their  pressing  problems  and  to  safeguard  peace  and  independ- 
ence than  through  the  broad  unity  proposed  bj^  the  Communists;  they  are  be- 
ginning to  realize  that  pressing  problems  can  orily  be  solved  by  way  of  struggle, 
and  that  the  guarantee  of  success  lies  in  strengthening  the  Communist  parties. 
But  the  imperialists,  the  landlords  and  big  national  capitalists  understand  this 
too,  and  resort  to  all  kinds  of  provocations  and  anti-communist  campaigns. 

Neither  slander  nor  provocation  nor  even  the  most  savage  terror  were  able  to 
stop  the  growth  of  the  nascent  Communist  parties  of  Latin  America.  And  there 
is  still  less  reason  to  belieeve  that  reaction  will  accomplish  its  objects  now,  when 
the  Communists  have  matured,  and  more  and  more  people  are  coming  under  their 
influence. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Mr.  Komfeder,  you  mentioned  Yankee  imperialism, 
or  as  the  Spanish  say,  "Imperialisimo  Yanqui." 

Is  this  a  Commmiist  invention? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  No,  no.  This  Yankee  imperialism  has  been  an 
ideological  punching  bag  in  South  America  long  before  the  Com- 
munists came.  The  Communists  just  picked  it  up  as  a  handy  item 
for  their  purposes. 

Mr,  SouRwiNE.  I  think  you  mentioned  earlier  that  there  were  some 
students  from  Latin  American  countries  at  the  Lenin  School  when 
you  were  there.  Do  you  know  what  happened  to  any  of  them?  Can 
you  name  any  of  those  students  and  tell  us  where  they  went  and  what 
became  of  them? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  I  knew  all  of  them,  but  by  their  party 
names,  but  those  that  I  worked  with,  I  learned  their  real  names. 

Senator  Keating.  Did  you  have  a  party  name? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Yes, 

Senator  Keating.  What  was  your  party  name? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  in  the  Lenin  School,  my  party  name  was 
John  Kass. 

Senator  Kttating.  K-a-s-s? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 


68  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

Senator  Keating.  And  then  you  took  a  different  party  name  when 
you  came  to  this  country? 

Mr.  KoRXFEDER.  That's  right,  and  another  one  when  T  went  to 
South  America. 

Senator  Keating.  How  did  you  keep  track  of  yourself? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That  was  a  problem  over  the  years,  or  it  became 
a  problem.  However,  anybody  that  comes  for  training  at  the  Lenin 
School  is  ordered  to  take  a  party  name  while  he  resides  in  Russia. 

The  idea  is  that  one  should  not  associate  the  name  used  in  the 
United  States  with  the  name  you  have  over  there,  because  that  is  a 
secret  school.  The  Soviet  Government  repudiates  its  existence.  I 
mean,  denies  the  existence  of  the  school,  although  they  pay  for  every- 
thing in  it,  and  it  exists  right  in  the  middle  of  Moscow,  and  they  never 
admitted  yet  the  existence  of  any  of  these  schools,  and  this  is  just  one. 
There  are  several. 

Senator  Keating.  Have  you  been  back  there  since? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  No. 

Senator  Keating.  Do  they  always  have  the  same  fu-st  names? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  No. 

Senator  Keating.  That  is,  when  they  take  these  different  names? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  No.  In  South  America  I  was  Antonio  Mendez. 
In  Moscow,  I  was  John  Kass. 

Senator  Keating.  Proceed. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  You  were  going  to  tell  us,  at  least  I  had  asked  you 
to  tell  us  if  there  were  any  of  the  Latin  American  students  whom  you 
knew  at  the  Lenin  School,  and  you  can  tell  us  about  what  happened 
to  them  afterward. 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  two  of  them  went  with  me  for  Operation 
Colombia.  Both  of  them  had  quit  the  party  in  the  late  thirties. 
There  was  one  from  Mexico  whose  name  I  don't  recall. 

There  were  two  from  Argentine.  There  were  two  from  Bolivia. 
And,  there  were  two  just  coming  in  as  I  was  leaving  from  Peru  and 
one  from  ChUe,  but  I  don't  recall  their  names. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Mr.  Kornfeder,  what  relations  do  the  Communist 
Parties  of  Latin  American  countries  have  with  Red  China? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  according  to  the  conference  held  in  Peiping 
between  Mao  and  Khrushchev,  it  was  agreed  that  the  Chinese  Com- 
munists act  as  instructors  for  these  new  operational  techniques  in 
South  America  because  they  had  the  most  experience  in  it  and  also 
for  the  reason  that  they  are  the  most  experienced  in  guerrilla  warfare., 
both  of  which  fit  into  the  South  American  picture. 

Mao's  main  contribution  was  really  in  developing  the  techniques 
of  these  so-called  democratic  revolutions  and  in  developing  guerrilla 
techniques,  so  they  agreed  that  the  Chinese  have  the  necessary 
practical  experience  to  operate  the  new  strategy. 

Senator  Keating.  Wo  will  take  a  5-minute  recess. 

(A  brief  recess  was  taken  at  this  point.) 

Senator  Keating.  The  subcommittee  will  come  to  order. 

Mr.  Kornfeder,  would  you  give  us  your  present  address,  please? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  3210  Brook  Tower,  Detroit,  Mich. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Mr.  Chairman,  on  the  point  of  relations  between 
Latin  American  countries  and  Red  China,  I  have  three  exhibits  to 
offer  for  the  record.  The  first  is  an  intercept  of  a  broadcast  in  English 
Morse  to  Pyongyang  concerning  a  meeting  between  Mao  Tse-tung  and 
Latin  American  party  leaders. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  69 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  received. 
(The  document  referred  to  follows :) 

Mao  Meets  Latin  American  Party  Leaders 
(Peking,  NONA,  in  English  Morse  to  Pyongyang,  Mar.  4,  1959,  1130  GMT— W) 

(Text) :  Chengchow,  Mar.  4. — Mao  Tse-tung,  Chairman  of  the  Central  Com- 
mittee of  the  Chinese  Communist  Party,  met  leaders  of  fraternal  parties  of  12 
Latin  American  countries  on  visiting  China  and  held  cordial  conversations  with 
them  yesterday. 

The  leaders  of  the  fraternal  parties  were  Luis  Corvalan,  secretary  general  of 
the  Communist  Party  of  Chile;  Pompeyo  Marquez,  member  of  the  secretariat, 
Pedro  Ortega,  and  Alonso  Ojeda,  members  of  the  political  bureau,  and  Guillermo 
Guardin,  member,  of  the  Central  Committee  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Vene- 
zuela; Gilberto  Vieira,  secretary  general,  and  Joaquin  Moreno,  member  of  the 
political  bureau,  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Colombia;  Raou  Acosta,  secretary 
general,  and  Jorge  Del  Prado,  member  of  the  Central  Committee  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  of  Peru;  Elias  Munoz,  member  of  the  executive  commission  of  the 
Central  Committee  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Ecuador;  Humberto  Ramirez 
Cardenas,  member  of  the  political  commission  of  the  Central  Committee  of  the 
Communist  Party  of  Bolivia;  Felipe  Bezrodnik,  secretary  of  the  commission  of 
the  treasury  of  the  Central  Committee  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Argentina; 
Wilfredo  Velazquez,  party  organizer  of  the  provincial  committee  of  Las  Villas 
of  the  Cuban  People's  Socialist  Party;  and  delegates  of  the  Communist  Party 
of  Brazil,  the  Communist  Party  of  Paraguay,  the  Popular  Vanguard  Party  of 
Costa  Rica,  and  the  Popular  Union — Communist  Party — of  Panama. 

Teng  Hsiao-ping,  secretary  general  of  the  Central  Committee,  and  Wang 
Chia-hsiang,  member  of  the  secretariat  of  the  Central  Committee,  of  the  Chinese 
Communist  Party  attended  the  reception  and  took  part  in  the  conversations. 

Chairman  Mao  Tse-tung  and  the  leaders  of  the  fraternal  parties  exchanged 
views  on  the  current  international  situation.  They  expressed  the  common  view 
that  the  current  international  situation  is  extremely  favorable  to  the  struggle 
for  peace,  independence,  democracy,  and  social  progress  by  the  peoples  of  all 
countries.  The  reactionary  forces  headed  by  U.S.  imperialism  are  disintegrating. 
The  revolutionary  forces  and  the  forces  of  peace  and  democracy  of  the  socialist 
camp  headed  by  the  Soviet  Union  and  the  people  all  over  the  world  are  con- 
tinuously surging  forward.  They  also  agreed  that,  provided  the  people  of  all 
countries  maintained  and  continued  their  unity,  their  vigilance  and  their  struggles, 
the  imperialists  will  certainly  meet  with  ignominious  defeat  if  they  launch  an 
aggressive  world  war.  The  just  cause  of  the  people  all  over  the  world  will  cer- 
tainly triumph  in  the  end. 

On  the  situation  in  Latin  America,  they  unanimously  pointed  out  with  satis- 
faction that  there  has  been  an  unprecedented  growth  in  the  patriotic  sentiments 
of  the  people  in  various  countries  in  Latin  America  recently  and  that  it  is  an 
irresistible  certainty  of  historical  development  that  the  people  of  all  countries 
in  Latin  America  will  rid  themselves  of  the  control  of  American  imperialism  to 
achieve  complete  independence. 

Chairman  Mao  Tse-tung  expressed  enthusiastic  sympathy  and  support  for  the 
peoples  of  the  countries  in  Latin  America  who  have  been  resolutely  opposing 
American  imperialism,  defending  national  independence,  and  striving  for  democ- 
racy and  freedom.  He  extended  heartfelt  congratulations  to  the  Cuban  people 
on  their  recent  victory  in  overthrowing  the  pro-U.S.  despotic  government. 

The  leaders  of  fraternal  parties  of  the  Latin  American  countries  talked  of  the 
great  achievements  in  building  socialism  that  they  have  seen  in  China  and  viewed 
these  achievements  as  contributing  greatly  to  the  Latin  American  people's 
struggle  for  independence,  democracy,  social  progress,  and  peace.  They  ex- 
pressed the  sympathy  and  support  of  the  peoples  of  Latin  America  for  the  Chinese 
people  and  thanked  the  Chinese  Communist  Party  for  inviting  them  to  visit 
China  and  for  their  warm  reception  during  the  visit.  Chairman  Mao  Tse-tung 
expressed  his  gratitude  to  the  leaders  of  the  fraternal  parties  of  Latin  America 
for  their  ardent  concern  over  the  Chinese  revolution  and  construction. 

In  the  talks,  they  unanimously  considered  it  necessary  to  continue  to  develop 
the  contacts  between  the  communist  parties  of  the  countries  in  Latin  America 
and  the  Chinese  Communist  Party  for  the  sake  of  world  peace,  national  inde- 
pendence, for  democracy  and  social  progress,  thus  contributing  to  developing  the 
friendship  and  cooperation  between  the  peoples  of  the  Latin  American  countries 
and  the  people  of  China. 


70  COMMUNIST    THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

VISITS  TO    PEKING,    SHANGHAI     - 

Peking,  NCNA,  in  English  Morse  to  Pyongyang,  Mar.  4,  1959,  1206  GMT— W) 

(Text) :  Chengchow,  Mar.  4. — Delegates  of  fraternal  parties  of  12  Latin 
American  countries  left  here  in  two  groups  for  Peking  and  Shanghai  by  plane 
this  morning.     They  arrived  here  from  Wuhan  for  a  visit  on  Mar.  2. 

They  were  seen  off  at  the  airport  by  Wu  Chih-pu,  first  secretary  of  the  Honan 
provincial  committee  of  the  Chinese  Communist  Party;  Chiao  Wen-fu  and  Li  Li, 
members  of  the  secretariat,  and  Wang  Li-chih,  first  secretary  of  the  Chengchow 
city  committee  of  the  Chinese  Communist  Party,  and  other  local  leaders  of  the 
Communist  Party. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  The  second  is  an  excerpt  from  Pravda,  February 
1,  1959,  pages  5  and  6,  and  a  translation  prepared  b,y  the  Library  of 
Congress  Legislative  Reference  Section,  being  the  text  of  a  speech  by 
Comrade  Severo  Aguirre,  People's  Socialist  Party  of  Cuba. 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  follows:) 

[Translation— Pravda,  Feb.  1, 1959,  pp.  5-6] 

Speech  of  Comrade  Severo  Aguirre,  People's  Socialist  Party  of  Cuba 

Dear  Comrades.  Permit  me,  in  the  name  of  the  National  Committee  of  the 
People's  Socialist  Party  of  Cuba  and  its  General  Secretary,  Comrade  Bias  Roca^ 
and  likewise  in  the  name  of  the  fighting  Cuban  people,  which  has  overthrown  the 
bloody  dictatorship  of  Batista  and  which  has  struck  a  great  blow  against  imperial- 
ism, to  transmit  to  the  Central  Committee  and  the  21st  Congress  of  the  Commu- 
nist Party  of  the  Soviet  Union  warm  brotherly  greetings.     [Loud  applause.] 

Cuba  is  located  far  from  the  borders 'of  the  Soviet  Union,  but  the  Cuban  people 
with  deep  interest  and  true  admiration  are  observing  the  wonderful  successes  of 
constructive  and  creative  work  of  the  great  Soviet  people.  During  the  gloomy 
days  which  Cuba  has  lived  through,  the  three  Soviet  Sputniks  brought  happiness 
and  hope  to  our  people.  Now  with  still  more  joy  we  are  greeting  the  launching 
of  the  cosmic  rocket — this  symbol  of  the  final  superiority  of  Soviet  science — 
because  this  new  great  victory  over  the  forces  of  imperialist  obscurantism  has 
coincided  with  the  great  victory  of  the  Cuban  people  over  the  imperialist  oppressors. 

The  great  victories  of  the  Soviet  people  which  have  been  carried  out  under  the 
leadership  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  Soviet  Union  and  its  Leninist  Central 
Committee  are  not  only  an  inspiration  but  are  a  real  aid  to  peoples,  such  as  that 
of  Cuba,  which  are  fighting  against  imperialist  aggression  and  represent  a  great 
contribution  to  the  cause  of  peace  and  socialism. 

Comrades.  The  Cuban  people  after  seven  years  of  hard  struggle  has  over- 
thrown the  contemptible  and  bloody  clique  of  Batista,  this  gang  of  criminals  and 
robbers,  which  seized  power  on  March  10,  1952,  was  a  result  of  a  military  revolu- 
tion prepared  in  the  State  Department  of  the  United  States. 

The  American  imperialists  placed  the  bloody  dictator  Batista  in  power  in  order 
to  deprive  the  workers  of  their  economic  and  social  gains  and  to  convert  our 
country  into  an  American  colony  and  to  tie  it  to  the  military  chariot  of  imperialism. 
Carrying  out  the  orders  of  his  imperialist  bosses,  Batista  established  a  bloody 
dictatorship.  Raising  the  tattered  Fascist  banner  of  anti-Communism,  he 
suppressed  and  persecuted  with  brutal  fury  the  People's  Socialist  Party  and  broke 
up  democratic  and  popular  organizations.  He  converted  the  army,  operating 
under  the  observation  of  American  "missions",  into  units  designed  to  inflict 
violence  upon  the  population. 

It  is  difficult  to  describe  everything  which  our  people  endured  during  the  years 
of  tyranny.  It  is  impossible  to  count  all  the  men  who  were  arrested,  tortured, 
or  killed,  the  women  who  were  beaten  and  violated,  or  the  children  who  were 
taken  as  hostages  and  killed  because  their  parents  were  revolutionaries  or  simply 
oppositionists.  It  is  also  impossible  to  tell  here  about  the  beatings  and  tortures 
which  the  political  prisoners  underv/ent  in  the  torture  chambers  and  prisons, 
the  atrocities  carried  out  by  the  aircraft  delivered  to  Batista  by  the  American 
monopolies  in  order  to  bomb  and  shoot  from  the  air  the  peaceful  population  of  the 
countryside,  towns,  and  cities  which  were  in  the  hands  of  the  rebellious  patriots. 
After  having  sold  the  national  sovereignty  of  Cuba,  Batista,  the  sadist  and  crim- 
inal, killed  and  tortured  over  20,000  persons. 

One  can  imagine  how  difficult  was  the  battle  of  our  party  and  of  all  Cuban 
patriots.     But,   inspired  by  the   victorious  theory   of   Marxism-Leninism,   the 


COMMUNIST   THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  71 

Cuban  Communists  never  lost  faith  in  the  people,  and  despite  tremendous 
obstacles,  always  found  suitable  and  real  forms  of  action  for  uniting  the  revolu- 
tionary forces  of  the  Cuban  people  from  below  in  the  battle  against  tyranny  and 
imperialism.     [Applause,] 

The  People's  Socialist  Party,  together  with  the  Organization  of  Socialist  Youth, 
operating  in  the  deepest  underground  and  subjected  to  constant  persecution,  at 
the  cost  of  the  Uves  of  many  of  its  leaders  and  members,  estabUshed  close  ties 
with  the  masses  of  workers,  peasants,  and  student  masses  and  with  the  revolu- 
tionary petty  burgeoisie.  It  fought  for  the  unity  of  all  the  opposition  forces  and 
supported  any  form  of  action  of  the  masses  against  the  dictatorship.  Even  while 
underground,  it  was  preparing  for  battle. 

The  experience  of  our  party  shows  that  even  in  the  underground  in  the  most 
diflBcult  conditions  of  illegal  existence,  the  party  must  and  can  carry  out  a  success- 
ful preparation  for  the  battle  against  tyranny.    [Applause.] 

When,  25  months  ago,  the  rebel  units  under  the  command  of  Fidel  Castro  and 
other  patriots  and  fighters  against  imperialism  began  their  armed  battle,  our  party 
considered  it  its  first  duty  to  aid  the  rebels,  giving  them  the  correct  orientation 
and  giving  them  the  support  of  the  popular  masses.  The  party  headed  the  battle 
of  the  peasants  for  land  and  thereby  increased  its  authority  among  the  peasantry. 

Our  party  took  an  active  part  in  the  rebel  movement  as  long  as  it  maintained 
the  character  of  a  partisan  struggle  and  did  not  have  anything  in  common  with 
putschism  and  individual  terrorism.  It  appealed  to  the  popular  masses  to  support 
Fidel  Castro  in  every  way,  and  with  the  means  of  its  disposal,  it  unmasked  the 
brutal  repressions  of  the  government  against  the  partisans  and  the  peasant 
population  of  the  partisan  areas.  Participating  in  the  armed  battle,  the  Com- 
munists conducted  themselves  nobly,  they  were  in  the  first  ranks  and  were  able  to 
win  the  love  and  respect  of  their  comrades  in  battle. 

As  a  result  of  the  armed  struggle,  Batista  dictatorship  was  overthrown  and 
then  the  military  junta  was  liquidated — with  the  aid  of  which  the  ruling  circles 
of  the  United  States  were  attempting  to  save  the  old  reactionary  regime  from 
complete  defeat. 

In  theses  just  published  by  the  National  Committee  of  our  party  it  is  said: 
"The  tyranny  was  overthrown  because  the  entire  people  turned  against  it  and 
took  active  participation  in  the  struggle  in  all  fields  making  use  of  every  possible 
method:  armed  struggle,  strikes,  general  strikes,  the  patriotic  movement,  the 
action  of  the  workers  and  peasant  masses,  propaganda  and  agitation,  boycotts  of 
the  fake  elections,  and  struggle  against  the  agents  of  tyranny  in  various  organiza- 
tions." 

At  the  present  time  power  has  passed  into  the  hands  of  the  rebel  forces,  headed 
by  Fidel  Castro  and  his  organization  "the  twenty-sixth  of  July,"  of  which  about 
90  percent  consists  of  peasants,  agricultural  and  city  workers,  and  students  repre- 
senting various  revolutionary  trends.  This  is  a  new  power.  The  entire  old 
government  and  military  system  has  been  smashed.  There  do  not  remain  either 
authorities  nor  organized  forces  which  would  represent  the  old  regime.  The 
newly  created  armed  forces  are  completely  under  the  control  of  the  rebels.  The 
leading  military  and  government  positions  are  occupied  by  persons  who  have 
been  nominated  by  the  partisans  or  approved  by  them.  The  old  army  no  longer 
exists. 

Upon  the  proposal  of  the  leader  of  the  movement,  Fidel  Castro,  there  was 
established  a  provisional  government.  This  government  enjoys  such  strong 
support  both  within  the  country  and  abroad  that  the  government  of  Washington 
has  been  forced  to  reckon  with  its  existence.  The. country  is  being  liberated  from 
oppression,  it  is  winning  freedom,  and  is  becoming  independent. 

Comrades.  It  is  difficult  to  describe  to  you  what  a  revolutionary  upsurge  has 
now  taken  the  masses  of  the  Cuban  people  who  have  risen  in  defense  of  their 
country  and  which  has  smashed  the  political  rale  of  foreign  imperialism. 

What  have  the  events  in  Cuba  shown?  The  events  in  Cuba,  like  in  Venezuela, 
have  refuted  the  claims  of  those  who  try  to  prove  that,  because  of  the  closeness 
to  the  United  States,  a  successful  battle  is  impossible  in  the  Latin  American 
countries.  When  the  entire  people  rises  in  an  armed  struggle  and  takes  the  fate 
of  the  country  into  its  hands,  victory  is  assured.     [Applause.] 

Small  Cuba  has  defeated  the  forces  of  reaction  and  imperialism.  This  victory 
was  possible  because  of  the  new  distribution  of  forces  on  the  international  scene, 
to  the  growth  of  the  camp  of  socialism  and  the  successful  struggle  of  the  oppressed 
peoples  of  Asia  and  Africa.     [Applause.] 

Latin  America,  whose  peoples  are  successfully  carrying  out  their  struggle  for 
political  and  economic  independence,  have  ceased  to  be  a  reserve  of  United  States 
imperialism. 


72  COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

However,  the  imperialists,  who  are  still  maintaining  their  domination  over  the 
economy  of  Cuba,  do  not  wish  to  reconcile  themselves  with  reality  and  are  con- 
tinuing to  attack  the  Cuban  revolution.  In  the  first  place,  they  have  unleashed 
a  furious  press  campaign  against  Fidel  Castro  in  connection  with  his  just  con- 
demnation of  a  group  of  the  chief  criminals  of  the  Batista  regime.  American 
propaganda  is  trying  to  deceive  public  opinion  with  the  aim  of  weakening  the 
wide  support  given  to  our  revolution  by  the  public  and  to  conceal  the  aggressive 
intentions  of  the  imperialists  in  regard  to  Cuba. 

In  the  second  place  the  imperialists  are  threatening  Cuba  with  an  economic 
boycott  and  even  military  intervention.  With  these  threats  thej'  are  putting 
pressure  on  the  less  reliable  groups  in  the  new  government,  attempting  to  force 
them  to  retreat  and  surrender.  At  the  same  time  they  are  carrying  out  an  anti- 
Communist  campaign  with  the  aim  of  dividing  the  people,  isolating  the  left 
parties,  of  regaining  political  domination  and  preserving  their  economic  privileges. 
Consequently,  the  main  task  of  the  People's  Socialist  Party  is  the  defense  of  the 
achievements  of  the  revolution  and  its  further  development. 

Comrades — Permit  me,  from  this  historic  platform,  to  express  my  gratitude  to 
all  the  communist  and  workers'  parties  of  the  world  for  their  solidarity  in  the 
cause  of  the  Cuban  people.  [Loud  applause.]  However,  all  of  you,  who  are 
people  with  great  experience,  can  understand  that  the  battle  of  the  Cuban  people 
has  not  been  finished  and  after  this  first  stage  of  battle  it  has  entered  a  new  phase 
which  is  f'ven  more  difficult  and  dangerous.  And  we  must  say  to  you  all  with 
great  clarity  that  we  need  even  more  assistance  from  the  public  of  the  world. 

Permit  me  to  wish  you,  comrades,  success  in  j'our  work  at  this  Congress  and  to 
express  confidence  in  the  victorious  completion  of  the  gigantic  seven-year  plan. 
[Loud  applause.     All  rise.] 

(Translated  by:   Boris  I.  Gorokhoff,  Library  of  Congress,  July  29,  1959.) 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Tlie  third  is  anotlier  intercept  from  the  Peiping 
broadcast  in  English  Morse  to  Pyong3'^ang  on  August  4,  1959,  with 
regard  to  a  message  from  the  all-China  Federation  of  Trade  Unions, 
supporting  a  land  reform  program . 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  follows:) 

ACFTU  Messagk  Backs  Cuban  Land  Refoem 
CPeiping,  NCNA,  In  English  Morse  to  Pyongyang,  Aug.  4,  1959,  1324  GMT— W) 

(Text:)  Peiping,  August  4. — Chairman  of  the  All-China  Federation  of  Trade 
Unions  Liu  Ning-i  today  cabled  the  Confederacion  de  Trabajadores  de  Cuba, 
in  support  of  the  Cuban  agrarian  reform. 

"The  Chinese  workers  from  their  own  experiences  realize  the  necessity  and 
justification  of  the  present  Cuban  agrarian  reform.  We  therefore  give  hearty 
support  to  the  struggles  for  the  realization  of  the  agrarian  reform  by  the  Cuban 
workers,  peasants,  and  the  entire  Cuban  poeple,"  the  cable  stated.  "Irresistible 
is  the  will  of  the  Cuban  people  to  eliminate  feudalism,  raise  the  living  standards 
of  the  urban  and  rural  laboring  jjeople,  bring  about  national  industrialization, 
and  safeguard  national  independence,"  the  cable  said. 

"We  are  deeply  convinced  that  the  Cuban  people,  who  are  rallying  closely 
around  the  revolutionary  government,  are  bound  to  achieve  final  victory.  The 
obstructions  and  sabotage  of  the  U.S.  im])erialists  and  reactionaries  are  bound 
to  meet  with  ignominious  failure,"  the  cable  continued. 

"The  Chinese  working  class  will  continue  to  give  resolute  support  to  each  and 
every  struggle  of  the  Cuban  people  for  social  progress,  safeguarding  national 
independence  and  world  peace,"  the  cable  concluded. 

Cuban  PSP  Leader  Hails  CPR's  Progress 

(Peking,  NCNA,  radioteletype   in  Englisli  to  West  and  North  Euroj^e,  Aug.  4, 

1959,  1331  GMT— W) 

(Text:)  Havana,  Aug.  2. — Cuba  has  aroused  great  attention  among  progressive 
peoples  throughout  the  world,  said  Juan  Marinello,  chairman  of  the  Cuban  People's 
Socialist  Party,  yesterday  in  giving  his  impressions  of  his  visit  to  socialist  countries. 

He  returned  to  Cuba  on  July  28  after  visiting  the  Soviet  Union,  Poland,  China, 
and  Czechoslovakia.  He  said  that  the  warm  reception  accorded  him  in  hia 
lengthy  journey  to  the  socialist  countries  showed  the  confidence  those  peoples 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  73 

had  in  the  Cuban  people  and  his  party.  Peoples  in  the  countries  he  visited 
understood  very  v>ell  that  a  victory  over  U.S.  imperialism,  the  major  enemy  of  all 
peoples,  was  a  triumph  of  all  and  a  guarantee  of  a  just  and  happy  life  in  the  future, 
he  added. 

Referring  to  his  impressions  of  China,  Marinello  said  that  the  changes  that  had 
taken  place  in  this  vast  Asian  country  could  not  be  described  in  even  100  talks. 
He  said  that  the  advance  of  China's  revolution  was  a  great  spectacle  in  the  current 
world.  In  comparison  to  the  past  situation  of  misery  and  oppression  caused  by 
the  imperialists  in  the  great  nation,  he  said,  China  had  within  a  short  time  gained 
incomparable  progress. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Now,  I  want  to  ask  you,  Mr.  Kornfeder,  is  the 
People's  Socialist  Party  of  Cuba  the  Communist  Party  of  Cuba? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Yes,  that  is  the  Communist  Party  of  Guba. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Mr.  Kornfeder,  during  the  testimony  that  he  gave 
before  the  Senate  Foreign  Relations  Committee  considering  his  nomi- 
nation as  Secretary  of  State  in  January  of  1953,  noting  the  striking 
similarity  between  Latin  American  and  pre-Communist  China  to 
which  you  refer,  Mr.  John  Foster  Dulles  said: 

I  have  the  feeling  that  conditions  in  Latin  America  are  somewhat  comparable 
to  conditions  as  they  were  in  China  in  the  mid-1930's,  when  the  Communist  move- 
ment was  getting  started.  They,  the  Reds,  were  beginning  to  develop  a  hatred 
of  the  Americans  and  British,  but  we  didn't  do  anything  adequate  about  it.  It 
went  on  and  on  and  then  finally  it  came  to  a  climax  in  1949.  WeU,  if  we  don't 
look  out,  we'll  wake  up  some  morning  and  read  in  the  newspapers  that  there 
happened  in  South  America  the  same  kind  of  thing  that  happened  in  China  in 
1949. 

Now,  I  would  like  to  ask  your  interpretation  of  this:  How  could 
what  Mr.  Dulles  predicted  come  about?  Could  it  be  done  on  a  conti- 
nentwide  basis  in  Latin  America,  or  would  it  have  to  be  a  country-by- 
country  proposition  in  Latin  America? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  as  far  as  tactical  operation,  it  would  have 
to  be  country  by  countrj^  but  as  to  general  strategic  pattern,  the 
same  pattern  would  hold  good  for  the  whole  continent — that  is,  the 
same  strategy  would  be  applied  throughout,  but  each  country — well, 
circumstances,  and  so  on,  being  slightly  different,  the  tactics  would 
have,  of  com*se,  to  fit  the  local  situation,  correspond  to  the  local 
situation. 

Senator  Keating.  What  should  we  do  to  counter  this  movement  in 
Latin  America? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  Senator,  that  is  a  subject  that  I  have  been 
doing  some  thinking  about. 

To  start  with,  you  have  to  have  people  that  understand  it,  and  that 
requires  a  concentration  on  the  problem.  It  cannot  be  handled  piece- 
meal. Let's  say  the  Communists  are  throwing  something  at  us  and  we 
resist  what  they  throw  at  us.  This  is  a  type  of  enemy  that  doesn't 
operate  that  way,  and  the  counter  tactic  would  have  to  take  into 
consideration  the  operational  techniques  of  the  enemy.  You  have  to 
train  people  for  this  type  of  combat.  This  is  a  new  type  of  warfare, 
of  conquering  countries  from  within. 

It  must  be  recognized  by  those  that  become  the  victims  of  it  that 
it  is  a  new  method,  and  you  have  to  appraise  it  with  sufficient  serious- 
ness to  make  an  effort  against  it,  and  that  effort  would  have  to  be  on 
a  large,  as  large  a  scale  as  the  enemy's  effort.  You  cannot  do  it 
without — no  war  can  be  conducted  without  trained  officer  personnel, 
and  this  is  a  war.  You  have  to  train  people  for  it,  and  you  can't  do 
without  it. 


74  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

Well,  this,  of  course,  is  one  angle,  and  if  you  get  that  far  and  begin 
to  wrestle  with  the  problem  of  a  continent,  you  probably  will  have  to 
modify  your  policy  in  various  respects  as  compared  to  the  present 
one,  but  that  day  will  come  when  you  will  handle  the  thing  as  a  major 
operation. 

The  Communists  have  things  pretty  much  their  own  way  at  the 
present  time.  There  is  just  no  organized,  systematic  counterforce 
against  it,  and  if  that  continues  they  will  eventually  take  over  South 
America  and,  of  course,  the  impact  of  that  on  the  other  continents  is 
going  to  be  terrific  because  in  other  continents,  to  them  America  is 
America,  and  if  the  Cormnunists  begin  to  take  pieces  out  of  it,  well, 
the  impact  is  that  the  big  giant  which  is  holding  on  to  a  free  society 
is  going  to  pieces  itself,  and  it  is  a  very  serious  situation. 

They,  of  course,  are  concentrating  on  South  America,  both  for 
their  ulterior  objective  as  well  as  for  their  present  strategy.  If  they 
could  create  a  situation  in  South  America  serious  enough,  and  compel 
the  United  States  to  orientate  on  its  own  backyard  and  withdraw  its 
concentration  on  Europe  or  Asia,  if  that  ever  happens,  that  is  exactly 
what  they  need  to  complete  their  conquest  of  those  two  continents. 

They  are  working  with  tremendous  concentration  on  Latin  America 
now  from  every  facet,  whether  commercial,  diplomatic  or  political, 
psychological,  and  every  way  they  think  of,  and  their  main  strategy 
of  approach  is  also  motivated  by  the  fact  that  they  are  now  concen- 
trating with  priority  on  Latin  America,  not  so  much  for  Latin 
America's  sake,  but  to  hit  the  United  States  with  it. 

It  is  a  tremendous  thing  which,  well,  I  hope  sooner  or  later  will  bo 
appraised  in  the  light  of  its  importance.  I  am  trying  to  help  along 
in  that  proposition. 
^Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Mr.  Kornfeder,  can  you  relate  the  overall  Com- 
munist operational  pattern  in  South  America  as  you  know  it,  with 
current  events  in  Cuba? 

Tell  us,  for  instance,  what  differences  there  are  between  the  Castro 
regime  and  a  typically  Communist  regime. 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  in  my  opinion,  Castro  is  carrying  out  fairly 
closely,  let  us  say,  anywhere  from  80  to  90  percent  of  the  Communist — 
present  Communist  pattern  in  America,  which  calls  for  a  so-called 
New  Deal  revolution,  a  revolution  which,  in  many  of  its  essentials, 
is  a  pro-Communist  pattern;  but,  it  is  not  exactly  like — does  not 
exactly  look  like  a  Communist  revolution,  and  the  Communist  machine 
throughout  Latin  America  is  in  full  support  of  him. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  But  Mr.  Castro's  method  of  control  of  his  party, 
his  organization,  is  not  the  same  as  the  Communist  method,  is  it? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  That's  right. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Wliat  is  the  difference?    Explain  it  for  us. 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  Castro,  in  my  opinion,  is  one  of  those 
fellow  travelers  who  is  not  easily  harnessed  to  their  customary  pat- 
terns of  operations.  For  example,  his  entire  July  26  movement  does 
not  operate  organizationally  the  same  way  as  the  Communists. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  How  do  you  mean,  it  does  not  operate  organiza- 
tionally the  same  as  the  Communists? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Well,  the  Communist  pattern  of  operations  is 
through  committees.  They  create  committees,  they  exert  their  con- 
trols through  committees.  Castro  thus  far  has  been  ignoring  entirely 
the  established  Communist  Party  pattern  of  operating  through  the 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  75 

committee  system  and  appointing  his  officials  purely  as  individuals 
appointed  by  him. 

The  only  place  where  there  is  a  committee  system  thus  far  in  Cuba 
is  in  the  trade  unions,  and  in  the  trade  unions  the  committee  system 
had  been  there  before  he  came. 

Well,  he  may  have  assigned  the  trade  unions  to  the  Communlbts, 
but  thus  far  they  have  not  succeeded  to  establish  control  over  them, 
but  this  is  the  only  place  where  there  is  a  committee  systen — in  his 
July  26  movement,  in  the  agricultural  regions  or  everywhere  else; 
Fidel  Castro  operates  without  the  conmiittee  system,  just  by  ap- 
pointing individuals. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  So,  this  is  a  difference  between  the  situation  in 
Cuba  and  the  typical  Communist  situation? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Now,  are  there  any  patterns  of  activity  ir-  Cuba 
which  are  typical  of  Communist  operations  on  a  worldwide  basis? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Oh,  yes. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  How  many  such  patterns  are  there? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  I  would  cite  at  least  three. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Tell  us  about  the  three. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  The  guerrilla  warfare.  Now,  the  difference  be- 
tween Communist  guerrilla  warfare  and  other  guerrilla  warfare  is  that 
the  Communists  combine  guerrilla  warfare  with  political  warfare. 
Their  guerrilla  warfare  is  just,  as  it  were,  a  feature  of  the  political 
warfare. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  You  say  this  situation  exists  in  Cuba? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  The  same;  that  technique  was  operated  in  Cuba 
while  Castro  was  in  the  mountains. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  What's  the  second  point? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  It  was  due  in  coUusion  with  the  Communist 
Party  machine,  although  not  controlled  in  the  usual  way  by  the  Com- 
munist Party  machine. 

The  second,  after  they  came  to  power,  is  the  liquidation  of  the 
opposition.  That  is  a  standard  Communist  pattern.  The  first  thing 
you  must  do  after  you  come  to  power  is  to  liquidate  systematically  the 
opposition,  by  arresting  the  individuals  that  you  have  reason  to  fear, 
by  taking  over  organizations  that  the  opposition  may  control,  or  dis- 
solving such  organizations. 

Well,  that  pattern  has  been  evident  also  in  Cuba. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  The  Communists  don't  have  any  monopoly  on  this 
particular  kind  of  an  operation,  do  they? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Beg  your  pardon? 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  They  are  not  the  only  ones  who,  on  coming  into 
power,  liquidate  the  opposition? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  No.  The  other  totalitarians  do  the  same  thing, 
the  Fascists,  the  Nazis. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  What  is  your  third  pattern? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  The  third  pattern,  where  there  is  a  very  close 
similarity,  is  the  peasant  question. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  You  mean  the  land  distribution? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  The  land  distribution. 

Land  distribution — of  course,  originally  land  distribution  was  a 
democratic  measure,  it  has  been  done  in  many  countries  long  before 
communism  was  heard  from,  but  when  the  Communists  use  it,  it  is 


76  COMMUNIST   THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

not  an  honest  reform;  that  is,  thoy  simply  use  it  to  ride  into  power, 
and  once  they  are  entrenched  they  take  the  land  away.  They  sort 
of  play  the  game  of  Indian-givers,  giving  something  and  then  taking 
it  away. 

Now,  the  pattern  that  Castro  has  been  playing  is  similar  to  those 
of  the  Communists,  because  his  land  reform.,  which  I  studied  quite 
thoroughly,  does,  and  proposes  to  do,  a  tremendous  job  in  expropriat- 
ing, but  the  land  distribution  that  he  prescribes  is  very  similar  to  that 
of  the  Communists  because  he  does  not  give  the  land,  does  not  dis- 
tribute the  land  to  be  ow^ned  fully  by  the  peasants.  He  gives  it  to 
them,  and  at  the  same  time  tells  them  that  they  cannot  sell  it,  they 
cannot  buy  land,  they  cannot  mortgage  it. 

Well,  that  is  very  similar  to  the  Communist  method  except  that  the 
Communist  method  right  at  the  beginning  declares  the  land  national- 
ized and  they  hand  it  out  to  the  peasants  just  for  working,  but  they 
don't  truly  own  it;  the  state  owns  it. 

Senator  Keating.  Can  they  under  the  Cuban  land  reform  transfer 
the  land  at  will  or  dispose  of  it? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  The  state  is  the  only  one  that  can  acquire  addi- 
tional land.  The  peasants  cannot  sell  it,  and  they  cannot  buy  it, 
only  the  state,  and  what  they  call  the  cooperative  system  or  collectives 
can  do  such  things  by  permission  of  the  authority  created  under  this 
law,  which  is  an  authority  entirely  under  the  control  of  Castro  who, 
on  the  basis  of  this  law,  is  the  absolute  boss  of  it. 

So,  you  have  a  situation  wheVe  the  land  is  not  distributed  fully, 
it  is  only  distributed  partl3^ 

Senator  Keating.  In  other  words,  the  peasants  are  given  the  use 
of  a  parcel  of  land,  you  might  say. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That's  right. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  And  virtually  required  to  work  it,  are  they  not? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Beg  your  pardon? 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  They  are  virtually  required  to  work  that  land? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Yes.  The  state  may  take  it  from  them  if  they 
they  don't  work  it. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  You  can't  give  it  out  to  a  tenant  to  farm,  j^ou  can't 
sell  it,  can't  borrow  on  it;  you  can  only  work  it? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That  is  why  the  Communist  pattern  of  land  dis- 
tribution is  there  in  principle. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  There  is  one  difference.  In  Russia,  the  piece  of 
land  where  a  man  is  working,  he  is  not  able  to  convey  that  to  his 
children,  is  he? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Well,  they  work  the  same  land. 

Mr.  SouRAViNTQ.  They  can,  but  it  depends  entirely  on  the  state 
as  to  whether  they  can  tell  them  to  do  it  or  not. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  It  depends  on  the  state,  but  the  state  doesn't 
bother  them. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  In  Cuba,  the  right  to  work  the  land  descends  to 
the  eldest  son,  under  the  agrarian  reform. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Under  Castro  not  everybody  can  inherit,  only 
one  person  can  inherit  out  of  the  family,  and  it  may  not  be  the  eldest 
son,  it  may  be  anyone  to  whom  the  one  that  now  has  the  title  desig- 
nates it. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Sort  of  serfdom  by  primogeniture 

Senator  Keating.     Not  necessarily  that. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Not  necessarily  the  eldest  child,  but  a  child. 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  77 

Senator  Keating.  That  is  my  understanding  from  the  witness. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  The  state  becomes  the  latifundios. 

Now,  the  Communists  have  been  carrying  on  tremendous  propa- 
ganda against  latifundios,  that  is  the  plantation  system.  The  State 
takes  over  that  function  now  and  calls  it  by  a  new  name,  cooperatives, 
and  well,  social  benefit  measures  or  whatever  good  names  they  find  to 
baptize  an  old  institution  with  new  names. 

And,  the  new  boss,  of  course,  is  a  worse  boss  because,  as  John  L. 
Lewis  at  one  time  said,  "I  prefer  a  boss  who  is  not  a  jail  warden  at  the 
same  time." 

Now,  in  this  case  the  State,  which  has  political  and  police  power, 
and  so  on  and  so  forth,  becomes  the  boss.  Under  this  system,  the 
private  sector,  that  is,  the  land  distributed  to  the  peasants,  can 
shrink  continually,  whereas  the  State  sector — that  is  the  way  the  law 
is  set  up — can  grow  continuously  so  that  eventually  it  will  be  a  state- 
owned  agriculture,  if  they  want  to  make  it  so,  under  this  law. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Mr.  Chairman,  perhaps  you  would  wish  inserted 
in  the  record  at  this  time  the  text  of  the  agrarian  reform  law  of 
Cuba,  from  the  Official  Gazette  of  Havana,  with  a  Library  of  Congress 
translation. 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  received. 

(Copy  of  "Agrarian  Reform  Law  of  Cuba,"  dated  June  3,  1959, 
follows:) 

Agrarian  Reform  Law  of  Cuba 

(Gaceta  Oficial,  Habana,  Extr.  issue  No.  7,  June  3,    1959) 

CHAPTER  I OF  LANDS  IN  GENERAL 

Article  1.  Large  landed  estates  (latifundios)  are  herewith  proscribed.  The 
maximum  extension  of  land  which  may  be  owned  by  a  natural  or  a  juridical 
person  shall  be  thirty  caballerlas  [one  caballeria  equal  to  33?4  acres].  Lands 
owned  by  a  natural  or  juridical  person  exceeding  this  limitation  shall  be  expropri- 
ated for  distribution  among  the  landless  peasants  and  agricultural  workers. 

Article  2.  Exceptions  from  the  provisions  of  the  preceding  article  shall  be  made 
with  respect  to  the  following  lands: 

(a)  Areas  sown  to  sugar  cane,  the  production  of  which  is  not  less  than  the 
national  average,  plus  50  percent. 

(b)  Cattle  raising  tracts  which  are  adequate  for  the  minimum  feeding  ot  cattle 
per  caballeria  as  determined  by  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform,  taking 
into  consideration  the  racial  category,  time  of  development,  percentage  of  births, 
regulations  of  feeding,  percentage  of  production  of  beef  in  the  case  of  beef  cattle, 
or  of  milk,  in  the  case  of  cattle  of  that  category.  The  possibilities  of  the  producing 
area  will  be  computed  by  means  of  physical  analysis,  chemical  analysis  of  the  soil, 
the  moisture  present  therein  and  the  rain  charts. 

(c)  Areas  sown  to  rice  which  normally  average  not  less  than  50  percent  of  the 
national  average  production  of  the  variety  in  question,  in  the  opinion  of  the 
National  Instittite  of  Agrarian  Reform. 

(d)  Areas  dedicated  to  one  or  more  crops  or  to  cattle  raising,  with  or  without  in- 
dustrial activity,  for  the  effective  exploitation  and  reasonable  economic  production 
of  which  it  is  necessary  to  maintain  an  area  of  land  greater  than  that  established 
as  the  maximum  limit  in  Article  1  of  this  Law. 

Notwithstanding  the  provisions  above,  in  no  case  may  a  natural  or  juridical 
person  possess  lands  of  an  extension  greater  than  one  hundred  caballerias.  In 
the  cases  in  which  a  natural  or  juridical  person  possesses  lands  of  an  extension 
greater  than  one  hundred  caballerias,  and  it  happens  that  on  these  areas  two  or 
more  types  of  production  concur  as  are  described  in  sections  (a),  (b),  and  (c)  of 
this  article,  the  benefit  of  exemption  which  is  established  up  to  one  hundred 
caballerias  shall  be  decided  in  the  manner  determined  by  the  National  Institute 
of  Agrarian  Reform,  the  remaining  tracts  becoming  subject  to  the  objectives  of 
this  Law. 

48354—59 — pt.  2 4 


78  COMMUNIST    THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

In  the  cases  of  the  crops  mentioned  in  sections  (a)  and  (c),  the  production 
mentioned  shall  be  computed  by  taking  into  account  the  last  gathered  crop. 
The  benefits  of  exemption  shall  be  continued  only  as  long  as  those  levels  of  produc- 
tion are  maintained. 

In  the  case  of  the  exception  mentioned  in  section  (d),  the  National  Institute 
of  Agrarian  Reform  shallldetermine  which  shall  be  the  areas  over  the  maximum 
limit  of  100  caballerias  to  be  subjected  to  the  objectives  of  this  Law,  taking  care 
that  the  economic  unity  of  production  is  maintained  and,  in  the  case  of  several 
crops,  considering  the  correlation  among  these,  and  between  the  crops  and  the 
cattle  raising,  as  the  case  may  be. 

Article  3.  Lands  belonging  to  the  Nation,  the  Provinces,  and  the  Municipalities 
will  also  be  subject  to  distribution. 

Article  4.  Exception  with  respect  to  provisions  of  Articles  1  and  3  of  this  Law 
shall  be  made  of  the  following  lands: 

(a)  Undivided  areas  granted  in  ownership  to  agricultural  production  coopera- 
tives organized  by  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  for  the  exploitation 
of  [public]  lands  of  the  Nation  or  expropriated  for  the  purposes  of  this  Law. 

(b)  Lands  belonging  to  the  Nation,  the  Provinces  and  Municipalities  which 
have  been  dedicated  or  may  be  dedicated  to  public  organizations  or  of  general 
service  to  the  community. 

(c)  Forest  lands  when  these  have  been  declared  to  be  incorporated  in  the  forest 
reserves  of  the  Nation,  subject  to  the  profits,  public  use  or  exploitation  as  deter- 
mined by  Law. 

(d)  Lands  of  rural  communities  destined  to  satisfy  the  purposes  of  social 
welfai'o,  education,  health  and  others  of  this  nature,  following  a  decree  establishing 
nature  by  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform,  and  then  only  in  the  extent 
required  for  these  objectives. 

For  purposes  of  the  determination  of  the  maximum  limit  of  thirty  caballerias 
mentioned  in  Article  1,  there  shall  not  be  taken  into  consideration  the  tracts 
necessary  for  industrial  establishments  affixed  to  rural  estates,  as  well  as  for  sugar 
machinery,  offices  and  buildings;  neither  will  urbanized  zones  in  the  interior  of 
rural  estates  and  those  which,  by  resolution  of  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian 
Reform,  are  intended  for  creation  of  the  villages  or  a  nucleus  of  rural  population 
in  each  Agrarian  Development  Zone;  nor  where  other  natural  resources  exist 
which  are  capable  of  exploitation  in  anticipation  of  the  future  development  of 
the  country,  within  the  discretion  of  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform. 

Article  5.  The  order  of  procedure  for  expropriation  in  each  Agrarian  Develop- 
ment Zone,  as  the  case  may  be,  and  for  redistribution  of  land  shall  be  as  follows: 

First:  Public  (National)  lands  and  those  of  private  ownership  on  which  there 
are  cultivators  in  the  category  of  tenants,  subtenants,  sugar  planters,  share- 
croppers or  homesteaders  (tenants  at  will) . 

Second:  Areas  exceeding  the  extent  of  land  not  protected  by  the  exceptions 
provided  in  Article  2  of  this  Law. 

Third:  Other  expropriable  areas. 

Unless  there  is  a  resolution  to  the  contrary  by  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian 
Reform,  expropriation  and  distribution  of  lands'  comprised  in  the  "Second" 
paragraph  shall  take  place  only  when  the  project  of  land  distribution  contemplated 
in  the  "First"  case  has  been  completed,  and  the  payments  based  on  extrajudicial 
assessments  have  been  made,  as  referred  to  in  this  Law. 

Article  G.  Lands  of  private  ownership,  up  to  the  limit  of  thirty  caballerias  per 
person  or  corporation,  shall  not  be  object  of  expropriation,  unless  these  are  subject 
to  contracts  with  tenants,  subtenants,  sugar  planters,  sharecroppers  or  occupied 
by  homesteaders  (tenants  at  will)  who  possess  parcels  not  larger  than  five 
caballerias,  in  which  cases  their  land  shall  also  be  subject  to  expropriation  in 
accordance  with  the  provisions  of  this  present  Law. 

Article  7.  The  owners  of  lands  affected,  once  the  expropriation,  adjustments 
and  sales  to  tenants,  subtenants,  sugar  planters,  sublessees  and  homesteaders  who 
have  established  themselves  on  the  farms  have  been  completed,  may  retain  the 
remainder  of  the  property  insofar  as  it  does  not  exceed  the  maximum  extent 
authorized  by  Law. 

Article  8.  Lands  which  are  not  registered  in  the  Property  Registers  up  to 
October  10,  1958,  shall  be  presumed  to  be  lands  of  the  State. 

Article  9.  State  (public)  lands  are  all  those  registered  in  its  name,  or  recorded 
in  the  inventory  of  National  Patrimony,  or  acquired  under  bids  or  under  any  other 
title,  even  though  the  titles  may  not  have  been  registered  in  the  Property  Registers. 

The  Ministry  of  the  Treasury  shall  proceed  to  annotate  and  register  all  the 
lands  which,  in  accordance  with  the  preceding  articles,  belong  to  the  State. 


COMMUNIST   THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  79 

Article  10.  There  is  no  limitation  of  action  with  respect  to  the  State  to  recover 
its  lands,  including  wastelands  and  those  which,  at  the  time  of  establishing  the 
Republic,  were  transferred  to  it  as  integral  property  within  its  patrimony. 

Article  11.  From  the  date  of  promulgation  of  this  Law,  the  making  of  contracts 
for  sharecropping  and  any  others  in  which  payment  of  rent  for  rural  estates  is 
stipulated  in  the  form  of  proportional  participation  in  production  is  prohibited. 
This  concept  will  not  apply  to  contracts  for  exploitation  of  the  grinding  of  sugar- 
cane. 

Article  12.  Commencing  a  year  after  the  promulgation  of  the  present  Law, 
corporations  which  do  not  fulfill  the  following  requirements  may  not  exploit  sugar 
plantations : 

(a)  That  all  shares  of  stock  shall  be  nominative. 

(b)  That  the  shareholders  be  Cuban  citizens. 

(c)  That  owners  of  said  shares  shall  not  be  persons  who  are  owners,  shareholders 
of  officers  of  companies  dedicated  to  manufacture  of  sugar. 

This  period  of  time  having  elapsed,  the  lands  owned  by  Corporntions  which 
do  not  possess  the  above  requirements  shall  be  expropriated  for  the  purposes  of 
the  Law.  Likewise,  said  Corporations  shall  lose  their  right  to  their  grinding 
quotas  which  they  had  at  the  time  of  the  enactment  of  this  Law. 

Article  13.  Neither  may  natural  persons  exploit  sugar  plantations  if  they  are 
owners,  shareholders,  or  officials  of  enterprises  dedicated  to  the  manufacture  of 
sugar.  Lands  owned  by  said  persons  on  which  sugar  plantations  are  located  shall 
be  expropriated  for  the  purposes  established  in  the  present  law. 

Persons  who  previous  to  their  present  position  as  owners,  shareholders  of  officials 
of  enterprises  dedicated  to  sugar  manufacture  had  been  cultivators  of  cane  for  a 
period  of  less  than  five  years,  provided  that  they  prove  this  fact  unequivocally, 
and  that  they  do  not  possess  estates  larger  than  thirty  caballcrias,  will  have  a 
period  of  ore  year  in  which  to  liquidate  their  incompatibilities. 

Sales  of  sugar  plantations  comprised  in  these  cases  will  take  place  with  the 
advance  approval  of  the  National  Institute  of  Agricultural  Reform,  which  will 
authorize  them  only  when,  in  the  opinion  of  this  agency,  the  objectives  of  the  Law 
are  not  being  evaded. 

The  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall  proceed  to  the  enforcement  of 
this  Article  in  the  necessary  time  and  manner  to  guarantee  the  normal  continuity 
of  production. 

Article  14.  Likewise,  the  holding  and  ownership  is  prohibited  of  rural  lands 
destined  for  other  categories  of  farming-hvestock  activities  by  Corporations 
whose  shares  are  not  nominative. 

Nevertheless,  Corporations  constituted  at  the  time  of  the  promulgation  of 
this  Law,  possessing  lands  not  destined  to  cultivation  of  sugar  cane  may  continue 
to  exploit  them,  until  the  excess  lands  which  they  may  possess  have  been  expro- 
priated and  distributed  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  this  Law,  without 
being  able  during  this  time  to  cede  or  transfer  the  said  lands  under  any  title  to 
any  other  Corporation. 

Once  said  excess  tracts  have  been  expropriated  and  distributed  in  accordance 
with  the  provisions  of  this  Law,  said  Corporations  may  not  continue  to  exploit 
the  lands  they  possess  unless  they  transform  themselves  into  Corporations  with 
nominative  or  registered  stock,  and  their  shareholders  fulfill  the  conditions  estab- 
lished in  Article  13.  If  said  Corporations  do  not  make  the  change  in  the  manner 
above  mentioned,  the  estates  owned  by  said  Corporations  shall  be  liable  to 
expropriation  for  the  purposes  of  this  Law. 

Article  15.  Rural  property  in  the  future  may  be  acquired  only  by  Cuban 
citizens  or  corporations  constituted  by  Cuban  citizens. 

Farms  not  larger  than  thirty  caballerias  are  exempted  from  the  above  provisions, 
when,  in  the  judgment  of  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform,  it  is  proper 
to  transfer  them  to  foreign  enterprises  or  companies  for  industrial  or  agricultural 
development,  which  are  believed  to  be  of  benefit  to  the  development  of  the 
national  economy. 

In  cases  of  transfers  by  inheritance  of  rural  estates  in  favor  of  heirs  who  are  not 
Cuban  citizens,  these  shall  be  considered  suitable  for  expropriation  for  the  objec- 
tives of  this  Agrarian  Reform,  whatever  may  be  their  extent. 

CHAPTER   II ON    REDISTRIBUTION    OF    LANDS    AND    COMPENSATION    TO    OWNERS 

Article  16.  There  is  hereby  established  as  a  "living  minimum"  for  a  farm  family 
of  five  persons  a  tract  of  two  caballerias  (66^^  acres)  of  fertile  soil  without  irrigation, 
far  from  urban  centers  and  devoted  to  crops  of  average  financial  production. 


80  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

The  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall  be  in  charge  of  regulating  and 
issuing  decrees  in  each  case,  as  to  what  is  the  "living  minimum"  necessary, 
differing  from  the  above  mentioned  basis,  and  taking  into  consideration  the 
average  level  of  annual  income  which  is  desirable  for  each  family. 

Lands  comprising  the  "living  minimum"  shall  enjoy  the  benefits  of  freedom 
from  attachment  or  alienation  referred  to  in  Article  91  of  the  Fundamental  Law  of 
the  Republic. 

Article  17.  Private  lands  subject  to  expropriation  by  virtue  of  the  provisions 
of  this  Law,  and  national  (public)  lands  shall  be  granted  in  areas  of  undivided 
ownership  to  coopen.iives  recognized  by  this  Law,  or  they  shall  be  distributed 
among  the  beneficiaries  in  parcels  not  larger  than  two  caballerias,  which  property 
shall  be  received  without  prejudice  to  any  adjustments  which  the  National 
Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  may  make  in  order  to  determine  the  "living  mini- 
mum" in  each  case. 

All  lands,  whoever  may  be  beneficiaries,  shall  pay  the  taxes  imposed  by  law  as 
their  contribution  to  public  expenses  of  the  Nation  and  the  Municipalities. 

Article  18.  Lands  of  private  ownership  cultivated  by  su»^ar  planters,  tenants, 
subtenants,  sharecroppers  or  homesteaders,  shall  be  granted  gratuitously  to  their 
cultivators  when  the  tract  does  not  exceed  the  "living  minimum."  When  these 
farmers  cultivate  lands  of  an  area  less  than  the  "living  minimum,"  then  the  lands 
necessary  to  complete  this  shall  be  gratuitously  granted  provided  they  are  avail- 
able, and  provided  the  economic  and  social  conditions  of  the  region  permit  it. 

If  the  lands  cultivated  in  the  cases  mentioned  in  the  preceding  paragraph  should 
exceed  the  "living  minimum,"  but  provided  they  are  not  more  than  five,  the 
tenant,  subtenant,  sugar  planter,  sharecropper  or  homesteader  shall  receive  two 
caballerias  gratuitously  after  the  expropriation  is  made  by  the  National  Institute 
of  Agrarian  Reform,  the  owner  being  able  to  acquire,  through  forced  sale,  that 
portion  of  his  possessions  exceeding  the  area  adjudicated  gratuitously  up  to  the 
limit  of  five  caballerias. 

Article  19.  To  owners  of  land  whose  area  is  less  than  the  "living  minimum" 
and  who  personally  cultivate  the  soil,  there  shall  be  adjudicated  also  gratuitously 
the  lands  necessary  to  complete  it,  provided  these  are  available  and  the  economic 
and  social  conditions  of  the  region  permit  it. 

Article  20.  Regulations  to  this  Law  shall  determine  the  form  of  procedure  to 
be  followed  in  cases  in  which  some  lien  exists  on  the  affected  lands. 

Article  21.  Lands  of  the  State,  cultivated  by  tenants,  subtenants,  sugar 
planters,  sharecroppers,  or  homesteaders,  shall  be  adjudicated  gratuitously  to 
these  possessors  when  the  extent  does  not  exceed  the  "living  minimum." 

If  the  cultivated  lands  in  the  cases  mentioned  in  the  preceding  paragraph  exceed 
two  caballerias,  provided  they  are  not  more  than  five,  the  tenants,  subtenants, 
sugar  planters,  sharecroppers  or  homesteaders  shall  receive  the  lands  gratuitously 
in  an  area  equivalent  to  the  "living  minimum,"  being  able  to  acquire  from  the 
State  that  portion  of  their  possessions  which  exceed  the  "living  minimum"  already 
adjudicated  to  them  gratuitously. 

Article  22,  Lands  which  are  available  for  distribution,  in  accordance  with  this 
Law,  shall  be  distributed  in  the  following  order  of  preference: 

(a)  Farmers  who  have  been  dispossessed  from  lands  which  they  cultivated; 

(b)  Farmers  living  in  the  region  in  which  the  lands  are  located  which  are  subject 
to  distribution,  and  who  lack  land  or  who  only  cultivate  an  area  inferior  to  the 
"living  minimum." 

(c)  Agricultural  workers  who  labor  and  customarily  live  on  the  lands  subject  to 
distribution. 

(d)  Farmers  of  other  regions,  preference  to  be  given  to  those  of  neighboring  areas 
who  lack  land  or  who  have  tracts  of  less  than  the  "living  minimum." 

(e)  Agricultural  workers  of  other  regions,  preference  to  be  given  to  those  of 
neighboring  areas. 

(f)  Any  other  person  who  presents  the  corresponding  application,  preference  to 
be  given  to  those  who  demonstrate  experience  or  knowledge  of  agricultural  matters. 

Article  23.  Within  the  mentioned  groups  in  the  preceding  articles,  these  shall  be 
preferred : 

(a)  Combatants  of  the  Rebel  Army,  or  their  dependent  relatives. 

(b)  Members  of  the  auxiliary  bodies  of  the  Rebel  Army. 

(c)  Victims  of  war  or  of  repression  by  the  Tyranny. 

(d)  Dependent  relatives  of  persons  dead  as  a  consequence  of  their  participation 
in  the  revolutionary  struggle  against  the  Tyranny. 

In  each  case  the  heads  of  families  shall  have  priority. 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  81 

Article  24.  Applications  for  endowment  of  lands  should  be  made  on  official  forms 
on  which  are  stated  the  information  or  circumstances  required  by  the  Regulations 
or  Instructions  adopted  by  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform. 

Article  25.  The  owners,  or  possessors  in  concept  of  owners,  of  rural  estates  whose 
areas,  either  singly  or  combined,  exceed  the  maximum  of  thirty  caballerlas  fixed 
by  Article  1  of  this  Law,  and  likewise  those  of  farms  of  less  area  which  are  totally 
or  partially  used  by  renters,  tenants,  sharecroppers,  or  partnerships,  or  occupied 
by  homesteaders  (tenants  at  will),  are  obliged  to  present  to  the  National  Institute 
of  Agrarian  Reform,  either  directly  or  through  agencies  authorized  for  the  pur- 
pose, and  within  a  term  not  longer  than  three  months  computed  from  the  date  of 
the  promulgation  of  this  law,  the  following  docimients: 

(a)  An  uncertified  transcript  of  property  deeds  with  a  note  as  to  registration  in 
the  Property  Register  and  payment  of  taxes  on  Real  Property  or  Transfer  of 
Property. 

(b)  An  uncertified  copy  of  the  Instrument  constituting  a  charge  or  lien,  if  any, 

(c)  Plans  of  the  farm  or  farms,  or  a  statement  as  to  lack  of  land. 

(d)  Detailed  statement  as  to  buildings,  constructions,  installations,  corrals, 
machinery,  farm  equipment  and  fences,  witti  description  of  their  types. 

(e)  Sworn  declaration  before  a  Notary  Public  or  Municipal  Judge  of  the  domi- 
cile of  the  deponent,  as  to  contracts  of  lease,  tenancy,  sharecropping,  sugar  plant- 
ing tenancy,  as  well  as  of  the  occupation  of  land  by  homesteaders  (tenants  at  will) 
with  respect  to  the  farm  or  farms  in  question,  with  data  as  to  terms,  conditions, 
rentals,  as  well  as,  provided  this  is  possible,  of  the  crops  or  sowings,  heads  of  cattle, 
types  of  pasture  and  approximate  production  figures  for  all  aspects  for  the  pre- 
ceding five  years  for  the  corresponding  farm  or  farms,  and  the  income  derived 
from  the  sale  of  products  during  the  preceding  year. 

(f)  Data  as  to  what,  in  their  judgment,  are  idle  or  semi-idle  lands  on  the  farm 
or  farms,  in  question,  the  area  of  excess  land  in  proportion  to  the  description  of 
the  boundaries,  and  an  estimate  of  the  value  attributed  to  them  indicating  these, 
as  the  case  may  be,  on  an  accompanying  plan  or  plans. 

(g)  In  the  case  of  farms  with  areas  under  intensive  cultivation,  which  are 
considered  of  benefit  under  the  provisions  of  Article  2  of  this  Law,  there  shall  be 
described  by  the  deponent,  also  the  areas  estimated  to  be  exempted  and  the 
remaining  area  affected  by  the  Agrarian  Reform,  indicating  this  on  the  accom- 
panying plan,  as  the  case  may  be. 

Notwithstanding  the  provisions  of  this  Article,  from  the  time  of  the  promul- 
gation of  this  Law,  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall  provide  for 
enforcement  of  precepts  insofar  as  concerns  expropriation  and  distribution  of 
lands,  based,  for  this  purpose,  on  information  in  their  power  as  to  lands  of  private 
ownership  which  exceed  the  estabUshed  limits. 

Article  26.  The  ovraer  who  does  not  present  the  documents  referred  to  in  the 
preceding  article  and/or  fails  to  tell  the  truth  in  the  sworn  declaration,  or  alters 
said  documents  in  any  way,  shall  lose  the  right  to  compensation  provided  for  in 
this  Law,  without  prejudice  to  the  criminal  liability  which  he  may  incur. 

Article  27.  The  authorities  entrusted  with  the  rpplication  of  this  Law,  after 
consideration  of  the  documents  referred  to  in  Article  26,  shall  immediately  make 
the  pertinent  investigations  to  ascertain  the  truth  of  the  depositions  within  a 
period  of  ninety  days  computed  from  the  initiation  of  the  application,  and  shall 
enact  the  resolutions  which  may  be  necessary  in  order  to  proceed  with  the  distri- 
bution of  the  lands  and  the  delivery  of  the  corresponding  ownership  deeds  to  the 
farmer    beneficiaries. 

Article  28.  Once  the  resolutions  which  provide  adjudications  of  parcels  dis- 
tributed to  the  beneficiaries  are  final,  they  shall  be  registered  in  the  Section  on 
Rural  Property  of  the  Property  Registry,  to  be  created  by  this  Law.  To  each 
beneficiarj'  shall  be  granted  the  corresponding  deed  of  ownership  with  the  formali- 
ties established  in  the  Regulation  to  this  Law.  For  the  purposes  of  Article  3  of 
the  Mortgage  Law,  the  resolutions  of  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform 
issued  in  accordance  with  the  above  paragraph  shall  be  considered  as  registrable 
deeds. 

Article  29.  The  constitutional  right  of  the  owners  affected  by  this  Law  to 
receive  compensation  for  expropriated  property  is  recognized.  This  compensation 
shall  be  determined  by  taking  into  consideration  the  sales  value  of  the  farms  as 
this  appears  in  the  municipal  tax  assessment  declarations  on  a  date  previous  to 
October  10,  1958.  Installations  and  buildings  affected  which  are  located  on  the 
farms  shall  be  the  subject  to  independent  assessment  on  the  part  of  the  authorities 
charged  with  the  enforcement  of  this  Law.  The  stumps  or  stocks  of  crops  shall 
likewise  be  assessed  independently  for  purposes  of  compensating  the  legal  owners. 


82  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

Article  30.  In  those  cases  in  which  it  is  not  possible  to  determine  the  value  in 
accordance  with  the  provisions  of  the  preceding  article,  the  assessment  of  the 
affected  property  shall  be  made  by  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform 
in  the  manner  and  using  the  procedures  established  by  the  Regulation  to  the  Law. 

Upon  making  the  assessments  and  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Aj-ticle 
224  of  the  Fundamental  Law,  the  value  for  improvements  which  have  been  pro- 
duced without  the  aid  of  labor  or  private  capital  but  only  by  virtue  of  the  action 
of  the  State,  Province,  Municipality  or  Autonomous  Agencies  between  the  date 
of  the  last  transfer  of  the  property  and  before  the  enforcement  date  of  this  Law 
shall  be  fixed  and  deducted.  Forty-five  percent  of  the  unearned  increment 
which,  according  to  said  constitutional  precept,  corresponds  to  the  State,  shall 
be  ceded  to  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform,  delivering  to  the  Province, 
Municipality  or  Autonomous  Agency  in  question  the  proportional  share  which 
corresponds  to  it. 

The  deductions  collected  in  favor  of  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform 
shall  remain  available  for  benefit  of  the  farmers  who  receive  free  lands  in  the 
corresponding  proportion,  and  the  remainder,  if  any,  shall  be  put  into  the  fund 
of  Agrarian  Reform  for  use  as  provided  by  Law. 

These  provisions  shall  be  applicable  also  to  all  auctions  or  forced  sales  of  rural 
estates  capable  of  registration,  in  the  manner  to  be  determined  by  the  Regulation 
of  this  Law. 

Article  31.  Compensation  shall  be  paid  in  redeemable  bonds.  For  such  pur- 
pose, an  issue  of  bonds  of  the  RepubUc  of  Cuba  shall  be  made,  in  the  amount, 
terms  and  conditions  which  shall  be  determined  in  due  time.  The  bonds  shall 
be  known  as  "Agrarian  Reform  Bonds,"  and  shall  be  considered  as  public  se- 
curities. The  issue  or  issues  shall  be  for  a  term  of  twenty  years,  with  annual 
interest  no  higher  than  four  and  one-half  percent  (4%  percent).  For  payment  of 
interests,  amortization  and  expenses  of  the  issue,  the  corresponding  amount  shall 
be  incorporated  each  year  in  the  Budget  of  the  Republic. 

Article  32.  The  holders  of  Agrarian -Reform  Bonds,  or  their  amounts  shall  be 
granted  an  exemption  for  a  period  of  10  years  from  payment  of  Tax  on  Personal 
Income  in  the  proportion  derived  from  the  investment  which  they  may  make  in 
t»ew  industries  with  tne  sums  received  for  compensation.  The  Minister  of  the 
Treasury  shall  be  entrusted  with  drafting  a  Law  for  the  Council  of  Ministers 
to  regulate  this  exemption. 

Equal  rights  shall  be  conceded  to  heirs  of  a  person  compensated  in  case  they 
should  be  the  ones  to  make  the  investment. 

CHAPTER  III — ON  EEDISTRIBUTKD  AGRICULTURAL  PROPERTY 

Article  33.  The  properties  received  gratuitously  by  virtue  of  the  provisions  of 
this  Law  may  not  again  be  incorporated  in  the  patrimony  of  civil  or  commercial 
companies,  except  for  conjugal  partnerships  and  agricultural  cooperatives  men- 
tioned in  Chapter  V  of  this  Law. 

Article  34.  The  properties  referred  to  in  the  preceding  article  by  virtue  of  the 
precepts  of  this  Law  may  not  be  transmitted  by  any  title,  except  by  inheritance, 
sale  to  the  State  or  exchange  authorized  by  the  authorities  entrusted  with  the 
application  of  the  same;  nor  may  they  be  the  object  of  contracts  of  lease,  share- 
cropping,  usufruct  or  mortgage. 

Notwithstanding  this,  the  State  or  the  proper  semistate  organs  may  grant  to 
such  owners  Loans  with  Mortgage  Securities  as  repair  or  pledge  loans. 

Article  35.  The  new  properties  shall  be  maintained  as  individual  real  property 
units,  and  in  the  case  of  hereditary  transfer  must  be  adjudicated  to  a  single  heir 
in  the  partition  of  estates.  In  case  such  adjudication  cannot  be  made  without 
violating  the  rules  on  partition  of  estates  established  by  the  Civil  Code,  they 
shall  be  sold  at  public  auction  among  bidders  who  are  farmers  or  agricultural 
workers  reserving  to  the  forced  heirs  if  any  in  such  casesj  who  are  farmers  or 
agricultural  workers,  the  right  of  redemption  in  the  manner  established  in  Article 
1067  of  the  Civil  Code. 

Article  36.  The  ownership  and  possession  of  lands  adjudicated  by  virtue  of  the 
provisions  of  this  Law  shall  be  regulated  by  the  provisions  on  legal  joint  ownership 
of  property  in  those  cases  of  extra  matrimonial  unions  of  stable  character  legally 
capacitated  to  contract  marriage  provided  they  have  lived  together  on  the  land 
during  a  period  of  not  less  than  one  year. 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  83 

CHAPTEB  IV ZONES  OF  AGRARIAN  DEVELOPMENT 

Article  37.  The  Zones  of  Agrarian  Development  shall  be  constituted  by 
continuous  and  definite  portions  of  the  National  Territory  which,  according  to 
resolution  by  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform,  may  be  divided  for  the 
purpose  of  facilitating  the  enforcement  of  the  Reform. 

Article  38.  Each  Zone  of  Agrarian  Development,  by  resolution  of  this  same 
Organ,  shaU  be  subdivided  into  sections,  in  order  to  facilitage  the  operations  of 
boundary  marking  and  the  administration  of  endowments  and  distribution  as  the 
work  of  carrying  out  the  reform  progresses. 

Article  39.'  The  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall  identify  each  Zone 
of  Agrarian  Development  by  an  orderly  numerical  series  with  an  initial  referring 
to  the  province  in  which  it  may  be  located. 

Article  40.  In  setting  up  a  Zone  of  Agrarian  Development  and  carrying  out  the 
redistribution  or  adjudication  of  lands,  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform 
shall  consider  the  following: 

1.  The  most  adequate  area  to  facilitate  the  work  of  officially  recording  the 
real  property,  taking  the  census  of  the  population,  agrological  investigations  and 
boundary  marking. 

2.  The  agrological  characteristics,  the  advisable  amount  of  production  and  the 
facilities  for  improvement  in  the  exploitation,  warehousing,  preservation  and  sale. 

3.  The  nuclei  of  population  or  small  towns  located  in  each  Zone  for  facilities 
of  local  supply  and  communication  with  the  centers  of  State  aid,  and  the  estab- 
lishment and  functioning  of  farm  associations,  cooperatives  and  service  stations 
for  the  Rural  Police. 

4.  Hydrological  resources  for  supply  of  water  and  installations  of  communal 
irrigation  under  a  rule  of  easement  or  of  cooperation. 

5.  The  facilities  for  economic  development  and  technological  application 
through  the  development  of  small  complementary  rural  industries,  or  the  promo- 
tion of  industrial  centers  near  the  sources  of  essential  raw  products  and  centers 
of  distribution  of  products, 

6.  Existing  facilities  of  communication  and  means  of  diffusion  of  news,  infor- 
mation and  ideas  in  general,  as  well  as  the  possibility  of  creating  these,  as  the 
case  may  be. 

Article  41.  In  each  Zone  of  Agrarian  Development  the  National  Institute  of 
Agrarian  Reform  shall  create,  with  cooperation  of  heads  of  family  or  agrarian 
cooperatives  located  there,  centers  of  State  aid,  supplied  with  agricultural  ma- 
chinery, farm  implements,  grain  storage,  warehouses,  deposits,  means  of  trans- 
portation, experimental  and  breeding  camps,  acqueducts,  generating  powerplants, 
and  other  aids  required  by  the  agrarian  and  industrial  development  plans;  and 
likewise  for  the  estabUshment  of  schools  with  internees  for  general  and  agricultural 
teaching,  maternity  houses  for  farm  women,  first  aid  stations,  medical  and  dental 
dispensaries,  recreation  halls,  libraries,  sports  fields,  and  all  means  of  aid  to  cultural 
production  and  diffusion. 

Article  42.  Each  Zone  of  Agrarian  Development  shall  be  considered  as  an  ad- 
ministrative unit  of  the  Agrarian  Reform,  being  registered  in  the  corresponding 
record  book  with  the  collection  of  all  pertinent  background  information  to  be 
taken  into  consideration  for  the  purposes  of  endowment  of  lands  and  determina- 
tion of  those  to  be  affected  by  the  Agrarian  Reform  or  excluded  therefrom. 

Likewise,  the  organization  of  statistical  services  and  the  taking  of  an  Agri- 
cultural Census  every  five  years  shall  be  taken  into  account  for  analysis  of  the 
units  of  production  and  administration  represented  by  the  Zone  of  Agrarian 
Development,  in  order  to  check  and  compare  periodically  the  results  of  the 
Agrarian  Reform  and  adopt  the  proper  measures  to  eliminate  obstacles  and  to 
facilitate  general  progress. 

CHAPTER  V ON  AGRARIAN  COOPERATION 

Article  43.  Wherever  it  is  possible,  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform 
shall  encourage  agrarian  cooperatives.  The  agrarian  cooperatives  organized  by 
the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  on  the  lands  which  it  has  to  dispose 
of  by  virtue  of  the  above  precepts  of  this  Law,  shall  be  under  its  management 
which  shall  reserve  to  itself  the  right  to  appoint  the  administrators  of  same  for 
the  purpose  of  insuring  the  best  development  in  the  initial  stages  of  this  category 
of  economic  and  social  organization,  and  until  such  time  as  greater  autonomy  is 
granted  it  bj'  Law. 


84  COMMUNIST   THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

Article  44.  The  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall  give  its  support 
only  to  agrarian  cooperatives  formed  by  farmers  or  agricultural  laborers  for  the 
purpose  of  exploiting  the  soil  and  gathering  of  fruits,  through  personal  counsel  of 
its  members,  according  to  its  internal  organization  and  rules  of  the  Institute  proper. 
In  the  cases  of  these  cooperatives,  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall 
see  that  these  are  located  on  lands  adequate  for  the  purposes  pursued,  and  capable 
of  accepting  and  using  the  technical  aid  and  orientation  of  the  said  Institute. 

Article  45.  Other  forms  of  cooperation  may  comprise  one  or  more  of  the  objec- 
tives tending  to  provide  material  resources,  implements  of  labor,  credit,  sale,  pre- 
servation, or  conservation  of  products,  constructions  for  common  use,  installa- 
tions, baling,  irrigation,  industrialization  of  subproducts  and  residues,  and  as 
many  facilities  and  useful  means  as  can  be  of  aid  to  the  improvem.ent  of  coopera- 
tives according  to  the  regulations,  resolutions,  and  instructions  issued  by  the 
National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform. 

Article  46.  The  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall  mobilize  all  neces- 
sary funds  for  the  development  of  the  cooperatives,  facilitating  for  such  purposes 
long-term  credits  which  may  be  amortized  at  a  minimum  interest.  The  Institute 
shall  likewise  give  short-term  credit  for  the  operation  of  such  cooperatives,  adopt- 
ing systems  of  financing  according  to  the  financial  means  of  the  enterprises,  and 
always  being  careful  to  guarantee  from  the  beginning  a  decent  family  income. 

Article  47.  The  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall  determine  annually 
the  quota  of  funds  to  correspond  to  each  Zone  of  Agrarian  Development, 

CHAPTER    VI. ON    THE    NATIONAL    INSTITUTE    OF    AGRARIAN    REFORM 

Article  48.  There  is  hereby  created  the  "National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Re- 
form" (INRA)  as  an  autonomous  entity,  with  its  own  legal  personality,  to  apply 
and  enforce  this  Law. 

The  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall  be  governed  by  a  President 
and  an  Executive  Director,  who  shall  be  appointed  by  the  Council  of  Ministers. 

The  following  shall  be  the  powers  and  duties  of  the  National  Institute  of 
Agrarian  Reform: 

1.  To  undertake  studies,  provide  for  investigations,  order  and  put  into  execu- 
tion as  many  measures  as  may  be  necessary  to  attain  the  objectives  of  this  Law, 
for  this  purpose  adopting  pertinent  general  and  special  regulations  and  instruc- 
tions. 

2.  Propose  to  the  Minister  of  the  Treasury  the  tax  measures  for  encouragement 
of  savings  and  consumption  believed  adequate  to  promote  the  development  of 
production  of  articles  of  farming-livestock  origin. 

3.  To  propose  the  margin  of  customs  protection  necessary  in  each  case  for  the 
better  development  of  agricultural-livestock  production. 

4.  To  coordinate  the  campaigns  for  improvement  of  living,  health  and  educa- 
tion conditions  of  the  rural  population. 

5.  To  determine  the  areas  and  limitations  of  the  Zone  of  Agrarian  Development 
which  it  has  been  decided  to  establish  and  organize. 

6.  Direct  preliminary  studies  for  the  distribution  and  endowment  of  lands 
affected,  installations  of  State  aid,  the  administrative  regulation  of  each  Zone 
and  delivery  of  the  lands  and  their  deeds  to  the  beneficiaries. 

7.  Supervise  the  enforcement  of  the  plans  for  agrarian  development,  endow- 
ment or  distribution  of  lands,  with  respect  to  the  internal  government  of  each 
Zone  as  well  as  with  respect  to  the  objectives  of  the  Law  by  issuing  instructions 
and  adopting  resolutions  and  measures  which  it  considers  necessary. 

8.  Draft  the  Regulations  for  the  agricultural  cooperative  associations  which 
it  organizes,  and  appoint  the  administrators  of  the  same,  in  accordance  with  the 
provisions  of  Article  43;  keep  records  and  decide  problems  which  may  arise  among 
its  members;  and  hear  and  resolve  any  appeals  which,  according  to  the  regula- 
tions,  may  be  made  on  basis  of  dissent  as  to  resolutions  or  measures  adopted. 

9.  Organize  and  administer  the  School  for  Cooperative  Training. 

10.  Process  and  decide,  in  accordance  with  this  Law,  all  petitions  or  proposals 
directed  to  it  with  respect  to  colonization,  endowment,  distribution,  administra- 
tion and  other  aspects  of  the  Reform,  determining  those  presented  in  order  to 
obtain  their  benefits. 

11.  Draw  up  its  budgets  and  administer  its  funds,  as  well  as  those  intended  for 
'  the  realization  of  the  Agrarian  Reform. 

12.  Organize  its  own  statistical  services  and  five  year  agricultural  censuses, 
compiling  and  publishing  their  results  for  general  information. 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  85 

13.  Organize  its  own  offices  and  enact  necessary  internal  regulations,  as  well 
as  to  establish  its  relations  with  the  Departments  of  the  Nation,  the  Provinces, 
Municipalities,  Autonomous  and  Semi-Governmental  Organs,  agrarian  commis- 
sions, and  with  agrarian  and  industrial  delegations  and  associations  in  general. 

14.  Establish  and  direct  its  permanent  relations  with  international  Associations 
as  may  be  proper. 

Article  49.  The  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  will  create  a  credit 
Department  for  agricultural  production.  In  turn,  the  Agricultural  Division 
of  BANFAIC  shall  adapt  its  credit  policies  to  the  rulings  of  the  National  Institute 
of  Agrarian  Reform. 

Article  50.  The  State  shall  provide  the  funds  to  the  National  Institute  of 
Agrarian  Reform  for  tjie  establishment  of  development  units  of  agricultural- 
livestock  production  in  all  regions  of  the  Nation.     These  units  shall  consist  of: 

(a)  A  center  of  equipment  and  machinerj'.  Said  center  shall  hire  out  services 
for  use  of  said  equipment  and  machinery  at  a  moderate  cost,  shall  lease  them  also 
at  a  reasonable  cost,  to  the  farmers,  or  facilitate  their  acquisition  of  the  same. 

(b)  A  center  of  research  for  experiments  of  agricultural  or  zootechnical  nature. 

(c)  A  center  of  technical  counsel,  for  advice  to  the  farmers. 

Article  51.  All  the  autonomous  organs  existing  at  the  date  of  the  promulgation 
of  this  Law,  destined  toward  the  establishment,  regulation,  propaganda  and 
defense  of  agricultural  production,  shall  be  incorporated  into  the  National  Insti- 
tute of  Agrarian  Reform  as  sections  of  its  Department  of  Production  and  Foreign 
Commerce. 

Article  52.  The  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall  have  local  dele- 
gations charged  with  the  execution  of  this  Law  in  areas  assigned  thereto. 

The  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall  regulate  the  functions  of  these 
Local  Committees. 

Article  53.  The  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall  present  the  draft 
Regulations  to  this  Law  to  the  Council  of  Ministers  within  a  period  no  greater 
than  sixty  days  from  the  date  of  its  establishment. 

CHAPTER    VII ON    LAND    TRIBUNALS 

Article  54.  Land  Tribunals  shall  be  created  to  hear  and  resolve  judicial  cases 
arising  from  the  application  of  this  Law,  and  any  others  related  to  agricultural 
contracting  and  rural  property  in  general. 

The  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall  formulate  within  the  period 
of  three  months  from  the  date  of  promulgation  of  this  law,  the  draft  Organic  Law 
for  said  Courts. 

CHAPTER    VIII ON    THE    CONSERVATION    OF    FORESTS    AND    SOIL 

Article  55.  The  State  shall  reserve  from  the  lands  which  it  owns  some  areas  of 
forests  and  woods  necessary  for  national  parks  for  the  purpose  of  maintaining  and 
developing  its  forest  resources.  Those  persons  who  have  received  any  lands  as 
owners,  pursuant  to  the  application  of  this  Law,  must  obey  strictly  the  forest 
legislation  and  take  care,  while  cultivating,  to  conserve  the  soil.  Violation  of 
these  provisions  shall  result  in  the  loss  of  the  right  to  the  property  acquired  gra- 
tuitously from  the  State,  without  prejudice  to  the  compensation  to  which  he  has 
a  right  on  the  basis  of  improvements  and  benefits  made  by  him,  from  which  sum 
shall  be  deducted  the  amount  corresponding  to  the  damage  caused. 

CHAPTER   IX GENERAL    PROVISIONS 

Article  56.  State  lands  possessed  by  tenants,  subtenants,  sugar  planters,  share- 
croppers or  tenants  at  will,  insofar  as  these  exceed  five  caballerias  shall  be  the 
object  of  distribution  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  this  Law,  following 
compensation  to  the  possessors  or  tenants  of  the  same  for  improvements  and 
benefits  introduced  by  them  on  the  said  excess  lands. 

Article  57.  The  right  of  preemption  granted  to  tlie  State  by  Article  89  of  the 
Fundamental  Law  of  the  Republic  to  acquire  with  preference  any  real  property 
or  securities  representing  such  property,  shall  be  exercised,  by  the  National  Insti- 
tute of  Agrarian  Reform,  insofar  as  concerns  rural  property. 

The  Institute  shall  exercise  this  right  within  the  period  of  sixty  days  computed 
from  the  date  on  which  it  is  notified  of  the  corresponding  ruling  of  the  Court, 
official,  or  authority  before  whom  the  forced  sale  or  auction  of  rural  property  is 
to  be  made. 


86  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

For  this  purpose,  the  judges,  courts  and  other  officials  intervening  in  auctions 
and  forced  transfers  of  rural  property,  or  of  securities  representing  these,  at  the 
time  of  adjudication  to  a  bidder,  shall  suspend  the  proceedings  and  give  notice 
through  official  memorandum  to  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform,  with 
a  description  of  the  property  affected  and  the  procedure  followed,  in  order  that 
within  the  designated  time  the  right  of  preemption  may  be  exercised  in  the  name 
of  the  State.    ■ 

The  period  having  lapsed  without  action  by  the  Institute  to  exercise  its  right 
or  with  no  communication  to  the  official  that  the  Institute  would  not  exercise  it, 
the  procedure  will  then  take  its  corresponding  legal  course. 

If  the  auction  or  forced  sale  is  of  rural  farms  subject  to  this  Law,  the  National 
Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  may  make  payment  in  public  debt  bonds  according 
to  Article  31. 

Article  58.  Excluded  from  the  benefits  of  this  Law  are  tenants,  subtenants  or 
homesteaders  (tenants  at  will)  of  rural  farms  dedicated  exclusively  to  residence 
or  recreation. 

Article  59.  Whatever  may  be  the  fate  of  the  property  affected  by  this  Law,  all 
grinding  contracts  for  sugar  cane  shall  be  maintained  in  force,  as  well  as  the 
rights  of  plantations  to  grinding  quotas,  distributing  these  among  the  new  owners 
according  to  the  proportion  of  the  quota  which  corresponds  to  the  lot  assigned  to 
them  in  the  distribution. 

The  distribution  of  grinding  quotas  referred  to  in  the  preceding  paragraph  shall 
be  made  with  the  necessary  adjustments  to  guarantee,  in  each  case,  the  protection 
granted  to  the  small  planter  by  the  laws  in  force.  The  National  Institute  of 
Agrarian  Reform  shall  take  any  necessary  steps  to  guarantee  to  the  sugar  mills 
the  supply  of  cane  required  for  the  grinding. 

Article  60.  In  all  cases  of  auctions  of  rural  farms  as  a  consequence  of  violation 
of  loan  or  mortgage  contracts,  the  children  of  the  debtor  who  have  been  working 
on  the  auctioned  farm  shall  have  the  right  of  redemption  which  may  be  exercised 
within  the  period  of  one  month  computed  from  the  date  of  the  corresponding 
registration  record. 

Article  61.  In  case  of  death  of  a  presumed  beneficiary,  which  occurs  before  or 
during  the  exercise  of  the  rights  recognized  by  this  Law,  these  shall  be  considered 
as  transmitted  to  the  heirs,  without  interruption  of  possession  in  question,  in 
accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Article  440  of  the  Civil  Code,  and  they  may 
be  protected  as  to  said  possession  by  the  procedures  of  the  Amparo  Appeal  which 
is  governed  by  Order  362  of  1900,  even  when  the  eviction  or  ouster  was  the  result 
of  a  resolution  of  the  administrative  authority. 

Article  62.  Eviction  is  prohibited  from  lands  possessed  by  the  presumed  bene- 
ficiaries designated  in  the  present  Law,  while  the  distribution  of  lands  affected  by 
the  Agrarian  Reform  is  still  in  progress. 

Article  63.  In  case  of  testate  and  intestate  succession,  in  which  the  hereditary 
estate  includes  a  rural  farm  or  farms  which,  as  of  January  1,  1959,  was  still  in  an 
undivided  state,  this  shall  be  considered  as  subject  to  the  purposes  of  this  Law  as 
if  it  were  the  patrimony  of  a  single  corporate  person. 

Article  64.  It  shall  be  a  rule  of  interpretation  of  this  Law  that  in  case  of  doubt 
the  decision  .shall  be  the  one  most  favorable  to  the  cultivator  of  the  land,  a  rule 
which  shall  be  extended  to  cases  in  which  a  cultivator  sues  for  ovsmership  or  pos- 
session of  the  land  or  for  his  inherent  rights  as  a  farmer. 

Article  65.  Any  act  or  contract  shall  be  considered  null,  void  and  ineffective 
which  attempts  to  evade  the  provisions  of  this  Law,  frustrating  its  purposes, 
through  transfers,  cessions,  separations  or  combinations,  which  are  fraudulent 
or  lack  true  basis. 

For  the  effects  of  the  application  of  the  present  law,  any  sales,  separations,  or 
alienation  of  any  nature  shall  lack  legal  value  and  effect  if  carried  out  since  the 
first  of  January  of  1959  in  favor  of  relatives  within  the  fourth  degree  of  consan- 
guinity and  the  second  of  affinity,  as  shall  also  any  partitions  of  land  jointly  owned 
by  said  relatives. 

Likewise  for  the  effects  of  the  application  of  the  present  Law,  any  adjudications 
exercised  smce  the  above  mentioned  date  shall  lack  legal  effect  and  value  if  made 
in  favor  of  shareholders  or  partners  in  Companies  of  any  category,  if  th^y  are 
related  to  each  other  within  the  fourth  degree  of  consanguinity  and  the  second 
of  affinity. 

From  the  date  of  promulgation  of  the  present  Law,  the  transfers,  separations  or 
partitions  listed  in  the  preceding  paragraphs,  even  those  not  between  the  relatives 
mentioned,  shall  be  considered  to  have  no  legal  value  or  effect  for  the  purposes  of 
the  application  of  this  Law. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  87 

Article  66.  Any  practice  contrary  to  the  objectives  of  this  Law,  or  the  abandon- 
ment or  negligent  use  of  the  lands  which  are  granted  under  its  protection  may  be 
punished  by  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  rescinding  the  transfers 
by  gratuitous  deed,  and  declaring  their  reincorporation  into  the  reserved  lands. 
The  Regulation  to  this  Law  shall  govern  the  application  of  this  Article. 

Article  67.  The  tenants,  subtenants,  sugar  planters,  sharecroppers  and  home- 
steaders who  cultivate  lands  of  an  area  greater  than  five  caballerias  whether  or  not 
these  are  located  in  expropriable  areas,  may  acquire  up  to  a  limit  of  thirty  (30) 
caballerias,  following  assessment  by  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform, 
through  forced  sale  in  a  procedure  which  the  Regulation  to  this  Law  shall  estab- 
lish, and  provided  they  can  prove  beyond  a  doubt  that  they  were  in  possession  and 
exploiting  the  mentioned  lands  before  the  first  of  January  of  1959. 

In  the  case  of  tenant,  subtenants,  sugar  planters,  and  homesteaders  who  possess 
and  cultivate  areas  greater  than  30  caballerias,  this  Law  shall  be  applied  as  pro- 
vided in  Articles  1  and  2. 

TRANSITIONAL  PROVISIONS 

First:  The  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  and  the  Department  in 
charge  of  Proposals  and  Studies  of  Revolutionary  Laws  shall  present  to  the 
Council  of  Ministers,  within  a  period  of  six  months  following  the  date  of  the  pro- 
mulgation of  this  Law,  a  draft  Law  regulating  the  Section  on  Rural  Property  in 
the  Property  Registers.  Until  such  time  as  this  Section  is  organized,  the  records 
concerning  rural  farms  shall  be  made  in  the  form  and  in  the  books  provided  by 
the  law  in  force.  The  registered  records  made  in  favor  of  the  beneficiaries  of  the 
Agrarian  Reform  shall  be  free. 

Second:  The  eviction  suits  or  other  procedures  which  concern  eviction  from 
rural  farms,  shall  be  suspended  at  the  point  at  which  they  are  now,  even  if  judg- 
ment has  been  already  rendered  until  a  decision  is  made  as  to  the  rights  which  this 
Law  recognizes  in  favor  of  the  occupants,  and  the  judicial  authorities  who  hear 
these  procedures  must  communicate  same  to  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian 
Reform. 

Once  the  rights  recognized  in  favor  of  the  defendants  or  occupants  have  been 
justified  in  the  procedures,  the  authority  who  hears  the  case  shall  order  the  filing 
of  the  proceedings  without  further  steps.  In  the  event  that  communication  is 
made  through  the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  that  the  defendants  or 
occupants  are  not  protected  by  the  benefits  of  this  Law,  the  suspended  procedures 
will  continue  according  to  Law. 

Third:  Appointments  are  null  and  without  value  or  effect  which  have  been  made 
of  officials  entrusted  with  services  related  to  the  Agrarian  Reform. 

Fourth:  Until  such  time  as  the  Land  Tribunals  referred  to  in  Article  54  of  this 
Law  are  organized,  the  ordinary  courts  shall  continue  to  hear  the  cases  assigned  to 
them. 

Fifth:  Until  such  time  as  the  Regulation  to  this  Law  is  promulgated,  the  same 
shall  be  applied  through  means  of  Resolutions  issued  by  the  National  Institute 
of  Agrarian  Reform. 

Sixth:  Within  the  period  of  six  months  following  the  promulgation  of  this  Law, 
the  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall  present  to  the  Council  of  Ministers 
a  draft  Law  regulating  its  incorporation  among  the  Autonomous  Organs  referred 
to  in  Article  51  of  this  Law. 

Seventh:  Within  two  years  following  the  enforcement  of  this  Law,  the  operation 
of  all  lands  of  private  ownership  must  be  encouraged,  whatever  may  be  their 
extent.  After  the  lapse  of  this  period,  those  lands  of  private  ownership  which  are 
not  in  production  shall  be  subject  to  the  objectives  of  the  Agrarian  Reform  in 
accordance  with  the  provisions  of  this  Law. 

FINAL   PROVISIONS 

Fu-st:  There  shall  be  reserved  in  favor  of  the  State  and  at  the  disposal  of  the 
Rebel  Army  the  title  to  the  peak  of  Pico  Turquino  and  a  belt  of  land  toward  the 
West  of  this  point,  with  a  longitude  of  fifteen  hundred  meters,  on  which  shall  be 
constructed  the  Rebel  House  (Casa  de  los  Rebeldes),  a  Botanical  Garden  and  a 
small  Museum  which  shall  serve  to  recall  the  struggle  against  the  Tyranny,  and 
help  to  maintain  alive  the  loyalty  to  the  principles  and  the  union  of  the  combatants 
of  the  Rebel  Army. 

Second:  The  provisions  of  the  present  Law  are  declared  to  be  of  social  interest 
and  public  and  national  utility,  because  it  insures  the  development  of  great 
extensions  of  rural  properties,  the  economic  development  of  the  Nation,  the 
intensive  agricultural  and  industrial  operation,  and  adequate  redistribution  of 
lands  among  a  great  number  of  small  property  owners  and  farmers. 


88  COMMUNIST   THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

Third:  The  section  on  Rural  Property  is  hereby  created  in  the  Property 
Registers  in  existence.  All  registration  operations  concerning  rural  property  shall 
be  entered  in  the  books  of  this  Section  commencing  with  the  date  designated  by 
the  Law  regulating  the  operation  of  the  same. 

Fourth:  The  National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform  shall  exercise  its  functions 
coordinating  them  with  the  Rebel  Army. 

FINAL   ADDITIONAL   PROVISION 

By  virtue  of  the  Constituent  Power  vested  in  the  Council  of  Ministers,  the 
present  Law  is  declared  to  be  an  integral  part  of  the  Fundamental  Law  of  the 
Republic  to  which  it  shall  be  added. 

Consequently,  this  Law  is  granted  constitutional  force  and  hierarchy. 

Therefore:  I  order  that  the  present  Law  be  observed  and  executed  in  all  of  its 
parts. 

(Translated  by  Mrs.  Helen  L.  Clagett,  Chief,  Hispanic  Law  Division,  Law 
Library,  Library  of  Congress.) 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  I  may  say  in  reference  to  this  law,  there  is  another 
point  in  there,  that  the  land  that  is  taken  away  is  on  the  basis  of  this 
law  to  be  distributed  with  preference  to  the  supporters  of  the  July  26 
movement.  That  is,  the  land  isn't  just  distributed  on  the  basis  of 
needy  peasants,  it  is  to  be  distributed  with  preference  to  the  members 
of  the  rebel  army,  to  their  sympathizers,  supporters,  and  their 
relatives. 

In  fact,  the  categories  that  he  lists  there  of  who  is  to  receive  the 
land  with  the  preference  is  so  large,  that  one  is  justified  to  suspect 
that  after  he  distributes  the  land  to  all  those  that  are  listed  as  pref- 
erences, there  would  not  be  any  other  land  left.  He  has  about  five 
categories  listed  along  those  lines;  he  can  use  this  law  to  eliminate 
the  opposition  and  to  entrench  his  poUtical  following  in  possession  of 
the  land. 

Senator  Keating.  That  might  be  said  to  have  an  element  of  appeal 
to  so  many  different  groups. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  This  law  is  really — it  should  be  studied  in  detail 
because  it  is  a  new  method  of  building  a  political  machine  without 
the  Communist  Party.  This  is  one  of  the  features  where  he  tries  to 
establish  an  organization  for  himself  that  he  controls  personally,  and 
it  may  be  used  to  keep  the  Communists  on  the  sidelines. 

Senator  Keating.  Do  you  think  it  is  safe  to  put  this  plan  in  the 
record  of  these  hearings,  and  make  it  pubhc  in  this  country — this 
pohtical  plan? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Oh.  If  there  were  a  plan  to  be  put  in  operation 
in  the  United  States,  you  mean — well,  that  would  be  quite  something. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Mr.  Chairman,  on  the  question  of  the  Communist 
line  with  respect  to  what  happened  in  Cuba,  I  have  an  article  from 
the  Worker  of  Sunday,  May  31,  by  Bias  Roca,  general  secretary  of 
the  Popular  Socialist  Party  of  Cuba,  under  the  title  "What  is  the 
Nature  of  Cuba's  Revolution?" 

I  offer  it  for  the  record  at  this  point. 

Senator  Keating.  It  may  be  received. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  89 

(The  newspaper  article  referred  to  follows :) 

[The  Worker,  Sunday,  May  31, 1959,  p.  7] 

Cuban  Communist  Leader  Answers  the  Question:  What  Is  the  Nature  of 

Cuba's  Revolution? 

(By  Bias  Roca,  General  Secretary  of  the  Popular  Socialist  Party  of  Cuba) 

A  short  time  ago,  in  an  assembly  of  the  Socialist  Youth,  a  discussion  developed 
about  the  character  of  the  Cuban  revolution. 

It  has  been  interesting  how  different  sectors  have  viewed  it. 

Some  placed  things  in  such  a  manner  as  to  come  close  to  saying  that  this  is  a 
Catholic  revolution,  that  it  follows  the  lines  of  Rerum  Novarum  of  the  Catholic 
social  doctrine. 

This,  naturally,  is  false.  The  Cuban  revolution  is  not  a  Catholic  revolution,  as 
it  could  not  have  been  either  Protestant  or  Buddhist  or  Spiritist  or  Masonic,  be- 
cause the  basic  problems  it  has  to  solve  are  neither  of  a  confessional  nor  of  a  reli- 
gious nature.  The  epoch  of  the  religious  wars — that  is  to  say,  the  wars  and  revolu- 
tions in  which  the  social,  economic  and  political  problems  were  presented  and 
debated  under  the  cloak  of  religion — is  past. 

Those  that  want  to  have  this  revolution  viewed  as  Catholic,  or  almost  Catholic, 
put  even  greater  effort  in  demonstrating  that  this  is  not  a  Communist  revolution. 

All  this  effort  is  unnecessary.  We,  the  Communists,  are  the  first  to  agree  that 
the  Cuban  Revolution,  in  its  present  stage,  is  not  Communist;  it  is  not  a  proletarian 
revolution  which  would  establish  Socialism  tomorrow.  Those  who  scare  easy, 
and  those  who  want  to  scare  everybody  else  with  the  ghost  of  Communism  can 
rest  assured  and  reassure  their  excited  friends.  Nobody  in  Cuba — not  even  the 
Communists — pretend  to  establish  any  kind  of  Communism  of  Socialism  at  this 
time. 

In  relation  with  this  a  phenomenon  characteristic  of  the  action  of  the  enemies 
of  the  revolution  is  taking  place. 

During  almost  three  months,  the  imperialists,  the  reactionaries  and  their  friends 
have  been  making  efforts  to  demonstrate  that  the  Cuban  Communists  had  done 
nothing  for  the  Cuban  revolution  and  that  we  had  nothing  to  with  it. 

They  pretended,  even  to  tura  the  Revolution  against  the  Communists  and  to 
raise  the  infamous  banner  of  anti-Communism  of  the  Yankee  imperialists,  of  the 
defeated  tyranny,  of  the  Trujillos  and  Somozas,  of  Franco  and  his  late  sponsors, 
Hitler  and  Mussolini. 

Now,  all  of  a  sudden,  they  turn  about,  and  without  abandoning  that  campaign, 
they  bring  to  the  fore  of  their  news  cables  the  aim  to  demonstrate  that  the  Com- 
munists determined  everything;  that  the  government,  the  journalists,  the  func- 
tionaries, etc.,  are  Communists.  If  we  were  to  add  up  all  those  that  the  propa- 
gandists of  imperialism  and  counter-revolution  claim  to  be  Communists,  we 
would  have  the  largest  and  most  powerful  party  of  Cuba.  This,  unfortunately, 
is  not  true  now.  It  will  be,  in  time,  because  history  marches  relentlessly  towards 
Communism,  towards  the  elimination  of  all  forms  of  exploitation  of  man  by  man. 

Let's  return  to  the  main  subject. 

The  character  of  a  revolution  is  not  determined  by  the  political  (or  religious  or 
philosophic)  affiliation  of  some  of  its  protagonists,  no  matter  how  many  or  out- 
standing they  may  be,  in  the  same  way  that  the  character  of  a  party  is  not  defined 
by  the  name  it  assumes  or  the  pretensions  it  proclaims. 

Let  us  remember,  in  this  respect  that  the  "Liberals"  of  Cuba  were  not  only 
conservative  but  also  reactionary  and  subservient  to  the  tyranny  and  that  the 
"Authentic  Revolutionaries"  were  not,  as  life  has  demonstrated,  authentic 
revolutionaries:  they  were  falsified  revolutionaries. 

To  define  the  character  of  a  revolution,  what  must  be  studied  firstly  and 
fundamentally,  is  the  economic,  political,  and  social  content  of  its  basic  tasks, 
of  the  historic  tas''s  it  resolves  or  intends  to  resolve. 

What  are  the  historic  tasks  the  Cuban  revolution  in  its  present  stage  of  develop- 
ment must  resolve,  is  resolving,  or  is  trying  to  resolve? 

Our  revolution,  in  its  present  stage,  has,  according  to  the  objective  realities,  and 
the  needs  for  the  development  of  our  country,  four  basic  historic  tasks;  they  are: 

1.  The  full  independence  and  the  sovereignty  of  our  nation. 

2.  The  Agrarian  Reform  to  end  the  latifundia  and  other  feudal  remnants  and 
to  give  land  to  the  peasants. 

3.  The  economic  development  on  an  independent  basis,  which  is  the  support 
and  guarantee  of  political  independence  (recovery  of  national  wealth,  national  con- 


90  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

trol  of  the  economy,  new  relations  with  external  markets,  elimination  of  mono- 
culture, diversification  of  production,  etc.). 

4.  Broadening  and  deepening  of  democracy,  giving  it  a  truer  content  (demo- 
cratic rights  for  the  people  and  the  workers,  eliminating  racial  discrimination, 
cultural  revolution,  elimination  of  corruption  and  fraud  in  elections,  etc.). 

The  basic  tasks,  imposed  by  the  historic  needs  of  the  development  of  our  coun- 
try and  not  by  the  opinions  of  any  philosophers  nor  by  the  whims  of  any  party, 
movement,  or  social  group,  are  the  ones  that  determine  by  force  the  character  of 
the  Cuban  Revolution  in  the  present  stage. 

The  revolution  is  currently  resolving  anc  trying  to  resolve  these  tasks. 

That  is  why,  to  the  question  of  what  kind  of  revolution  is  this  one,  we  can  answer 
that  it  is  a  patriotic  and  democratic,  national-liberating  and  agrarian  revolution. 

It  is  not,  in  its  present  stage,  a  socialist  revolution.  Its  tasks  remain  within  the 
bourgeois  frame  of  society.  It  does  not  intend  nor  pretend  to  destroy  the  capital- 
ist regime  as  such,  but  to  eliminate  the  domination  and  exploitation  of  foreign 
imperialism  and  to  destroy  the  semifeudal  latifundia,  to  promote  and  accelerate 
its  own  economic  development,  and  radically  better  the  living  and  working  condi- 
tions of  the  exploited  masses. 

If  we  take  into  account  not  only  the  economic-political-social  content  of  its 
basic  tasks,  but  also  the  forces  that  move  this  revolution,  the  classes  and  social 
forces  that  determine,  realize,  and  impel  it,  and  the  rhythm  and  depth  of  its 
development,  I  would  say  that  it  is  an  advanced  popular  revolution. 

I  say  "popular,"  because  this  is  a  revolution  of  the  popular  classes,  of  the 
peasant,  of  the  workers,  of  the  middle  layers  of  the  petty  bourgeoisie  and  of  the 
bourgeoisie.  The  masses  of  the  Rebel  Army  are  composed  mainly  of  peasants 
and  agrarian  workers.  Its  officers  are  also  from  these  sectors,  from  the  petty 
bourgeoisie  and  from  the  workers. 

The  workers  from  the  cities,  in  spite  of  the  official  Batista  trade  union  machine 
were  the  driving  force  and  the  mass  of  the  resistance,  of  the  agitation,  of  the 
mobilization  against  the  tyranny  in  the  plains,  and  acted  with  decisiveness  and 
unanimity  to  frustrate  the  maneuvers*  of  Cantillo  and  others  who  tried  to  blunt 
the  revolution. 

I  say  "advanced"  because,  even  though  the  national  bourgeoisie  is  a  force  in 
the  revolution,  it  has  not  been  able  to  capitalize  on  the  popular  sacrifice  to  take 
the  leadership;  because  from  the  moment  in  which  Fidel  Castro  assumed  the  post, 
of  Premier  and  fused  the  revolutionary  power  with  the  provisional  government, 
the  leadership  moved  to  the  radical  petty  bourgeoisie;  because  the  political 
changes  and  the  destruction  of  the  power  apparatus  of  the  tyrannic-pro-imperialist 
regime,  have  been  profound  and  radical;  because  the  measures  against  the  bureau- 
cratic bourgeoisie  and  those  who  misappropriate  public  funds  are  speedy  and 
direct;  of  simple  confiscation  of  estates  without  further  process;  because  the 
recovery  of  the  full  national  independence  and  national  sovereignty  has  been  done 
sharply,  resolutely,  and  radically,  as  demonstrated  by  the  expulsion  of  the  U.S. 
military  mission  and  the  basic  stands  on  foreign  policy  proclaimed  by  Fidel  Castro. 

Because  of  all  this  we  can  conclude  that  the  Cuban  revolution  is  an  advanced 
popular  revolution,  a  patriotic  and  democratic,  national-liberating,  and  agrarian 
revolution. 

1.  This  is  the  revolution  of  the  full  independence  and  sovereignty. 

2.  This  is  the  revolution  against  the  latifundia  and  for  the  distribution  of  land 
to  the  peasants. 

3.  This  is  the  revolution  of  the  economic  independence  and  industrialization 
which  guarantee  and  consolidate  the  political  independence  and  sovereignty, 
already  recovered  and  established. 

4.  This  is  the  revolution  of  democracy  with  a  new  meaning,  with  the  meaning  of 
revolutionary  and  progressive  democracy. 

5.  This  is  the  revolution  of  the  Cuban  people,  the  old  revolution  started  in 
1868,  restarted  in  1895,  frustrated  in  1933,  which  in  every  date  poses  the  same  old 
demands  on  a  higher  level,  which  now  develops  victoriously  under  the  conditions 
of  a  new  epoch  which  impresses  on  it  its  stamp;  of  the  epoch  of  the  advance  of 
socialism  and  of  the  decline  of  imperialism,  of  the  epoch  of  the  end  of  colonialism, 
of  the  epoch  in  which  the  proletariat  has  substituted  the  bourgeoisie  as  the  embodi- 
ment of  progress,  of  the  epoch  in  which  the  world  marches  speedily  to  the  new  and 
higher  freedom  of  Communism. 

It  is,  as  Fidel  Castro  said,  a  revolution  as  Cuban  as  the  palm  trees,  but  that,  as 
these,  makes  its  mark  in  the  world  picture,  it  influences  it  and  receives  from  it  its 
inevitable  influence. 

Yes,  we  can  simply  say,  this  is  the  Cuban  revolution,  the  revolution  that  will 
not  halt,  that  must  not  halt,  that  must  maintain  its  rhythm  and,  at  the  right 
time  must  pass  to  its  next  stage,  in  search  of  greater  social  and  national  progress. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  91 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Following  what  you  just  said  about  Castro  building 
a  personal  machine,  do  you  foresee  cooperation  or  friction  between 
Castro  and  the  Communist  Party  in  Cuba? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER,  Oh,  I  foresee  friction  because  the  Communist 
Party  is  a  political  animal,  which,  as  it  were,  has  its  automatic  laws 
of  growth  and  development.  They  cannot  tolerate  a  situation  where 
they  do  not  grow,  are  not  permitted  to  wedge  in.  They  must  be  in 
opposition  if  they  are  obstructed,  and  the  type  of  machine  that  Castro 
is  setting  up  there  is  a  machine  that  could  obstruct  them,  they  will 
seek  to  break  through  and  force  Castro  to  establish  the  committee 
system  instead  of  personal  appointees,  then  that  will  give  them  an 
opening  to  move  in. 

So,  friction,  in  my  opinion,  is  inevitable  between  Castro  and  the 
Communists. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  You  mean,  the  Communist  Party  of  Cuba  or 
Moscow  Communists,  or  is  it  the  same  thing? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  No.  I  mean  the  Commi'.nist  Party  of  Cuba. 
Moscow,  in  my  opinion,  will  play  along  with  Castro  for  major  strategic 
reasons,  even  if  they  have  to  overrule  the  local  Communists.  Moscow 
has  sacrificed  its  hard  core  many  times  before  to  serve  its  gods  of 
strategy,  and  it  is  possible  that  they  will  do  it  here.  Certainly,  they 
will  restrain  the  local  Communists  from  developing  a  conflict. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Mr.  Chairman,  further  on  the  point  of  Communist 
views  in  regard  to  what  is  happening  in  Cuba,  I  offer  certain  excerpts 
from  a  two-page  article  from  the  World  Marxist  Review  of  April  1959, 
headed  "Cuba  Today." 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  received. 

(Excerpt  of  article  from  World  Marxist  Review  of  April  1959 
follows:) 

Excerpts  Fkom  World  Marxist  Review  for  April  1959,  Article  Entitled 

"Cuba  Today,"  Pages  69  and  70 

"The  new  regime,  as  we  see,  has  mass  support  (workers,  peasants  and  national 
bourgeoisie),  with  the  national  and  petty  bourgeoisie  playing  the  leading  role. 
The  provisional  government  is  not  representative  of  all  the  political  forces  which 
brought  it  to  power  and  which  support  it  and  for  this  reason  cannot  be  regarded 
as  the  government  of  a  revolutionary  and  popular  coalition." 

******* 

"The  fight  for  unity  does  not  preclude  the  possibility  of  differences  arising  among 
these  forces. 

"These  diflferences  should  not  be  hushed  up  or  evaded.  On  the  contrary,  in 
view  of  the  tasks  facing  all  classes,  they  should  be  overcome  in  unison,  in  a  demo- 
cratic way,  but  utilizing  the  freedom  which  has  been  won.  Furthermore,  it  is 
necessary  to  preserve  the  solidarity  of  the  revolutionary  camp,  the  identity  of 
viewpoints  and  co-ordination  for  the  purpose  of  achieving  the  common  aim  and 
plans." 

******* 

"All  agents  and  associates  of  the  tyranny  guilty  of  crimes,  torture,  etc.,  must 
be  severely  punished  and  the  reactionary  deputies,  elected  during  the  last,  rigged 
elections  and  during  the  equally  shameful  elections  in  1954,  deprived  of  the  right 
to  engage  in  politics." 

******* 

"The  Popular  Socialist  Party,  the  theses  say,  aims  at  achieving  its  lofty  libera- 
tion goals  and  a  socialist  future  without  another  civil  war. 

"Although  during  the  years  of  the  tyranny  the  Party  tried  to  avoid  violence, 
the  imperialists  and  reactionaries  made  civil  war  inevitable.  Consequently  the 
Party  supported  the  revolutionary  war.     Many  of  the  members  and  sympathizers 


92  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

fought  with  the  insurgent  army  in  which  they  distinguished  themselves,  winning 
general  recognition  for  their  courage.  In  some  places  the  armed  units  formed  on 
the  Party's  initiative  joined  forces  with  Fidel  Castro." 

******* 

"While  not  satisfied  with  the  present  composition  of  the  provisional  government 
the  Party  nevertheless  supports  the  new  regime  and  defends  it  against  the  attacks, 
conspiracies  and  pressure  of  the  home  reactionaries  and  foreign  imperialists.  It 
stands  for  a  government  based  on  a  broad  popular  coalition,  including  repres6nta- 
tives  not  only  of  the  bourgeoisie  and  petty  bourgeoisie  but  also  of  the  peasantry 
and  the  proletariat." 

******* 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  I  also  offer  an  article  by  R.  Hart  Phillips,  special 
to  the  New  York  Times,  from  the  New  York  Times  of  Sunday,  May 
31,  1959. 

Senator  Keating.  That  will  be  received. 

(The  newspaper  article  referred  to  follows:) 

[The  New  York  Times,  Sunday,  May  31, 1959] 

Communists  in  Cuba  Pose  a  Big  Problem 

castbo  has  tet  to  take  firm  stand  on  their  role  in  politics 

(By  R.  Hart  Phillips,  special  to  the  New  York  Times) 

Havana,  May  30. — Cubans  and  the  outside  world  are  today  attempting  to 
measure  the  degree  of  influence  the  Communists  have  in  the  revolutionary  gov- 
ernment of.  Premier  Fidel  Castro. 

Many  Cubans  feel  that  Dr.  Castro's  reforms  follow  the  Communist  pattern. 
They  note  his  steps  toward  expropriation  of  the  lands  of  the  big  sugar  companies, 
both  American  and  Cuban,  and  other  big  tracts  under  the  new  agrarian  law,  his 
drastic  lowering  of  land  values  through  mandatory  rent  reduction,  and  other  re- 
forms, which  they  say  indicate  that  the  Government  is  being  led  down  the  path 
to  communism.  They  point  to  many  key  figures  in  the  Government  who  are 
known  to  be  sympathizers  and  close  collaborators  with  the  Communists. 

"The  Communists  are  a  part  of  Castro's  26th  of  July  revolution,"  Dr.  Carlos 
Rafael  Rodriguez,  editor  of  the  Communist  newspaper  Hoy,  told  this  correspond- 
ent. "We  are  not  participating  in  the  actual  government  but  we  are  participat- 
ing in  the  revolution  because  this  is  a  revolution  of  the  people. 

"If  you  will  read  our  program  written  in  January  1956,  and  published  in  Decem- 
ber 1957,  you  will  see  the  coincidence  between  the  program  of  the  Castro  revolu- 
tion and  the  Communist  program  for  this  historic  moment." 

DECLARED    PROGRAM 

Dr.  Rodriguez  went  on  to  say  that  the  Communists  believe  Cuba  must  have 
"economic  and  political  independence,  industrial  development,  agrarian  reform, 
a  change  in  fiscal  and  tariff  policies  and  other  reforms  before  going  into  socialism." 

Conrado  Beauer,  recently  elected  secretary  general  of  the  Federation  of  Sugar 
Workers  of  Cuba,  said  yesterday  that  "the  Communists  never  helped  the  2fith 
of  July  labor  movement  until  the  26th  of  December — 5  days  before  the  fall  of 
the  Batista  regime." 

According  to  Senor  Beouer,  the  Communists  have  lost  force  in  Cuban  labor 
unions  since  the  26th  of  July  movement  won  the  elections  in  all  unions  this  year. 

"The  Communists  never  helped  or  cooperated  with  the  26th  of  July  revolution 
durinoc  its  2  years'  fight  against  Batista,"  he  asserted. 

Sefior  Bequer  went  on  to  say  that  the  Communists  had  been  unable  to  elect 
more  than  13  delegates  to  the  recent  congress  of  the  Sugar  Workers  Federation 
which  elected  him  secretary  general. 

The  Communist  newspaper  Hoy  and  the  official  organ  of  the  Castro  Govern- 
ment, Revolucion,  have  been  engaged  in  a  public  argument  for  the  last  3  weeks. 
Revolucion  charges  that  the  Communists  are  trying  to  divide  the  Cuban  revolu- 
tion by  maintaining  their  identity  instead  of  working  for  the  revolution. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  93 

COOPERATE   CLOSELY 

Since  the  victory  of  the  Castro  revolution  last  January  1,  the  Communists 
and  the  26th  of  July  movement  have  been  in  close  cooperation.  Premier  Castro 
has  repeatedly  said,  "We  will  never  combat  communism." 

So  far,  there  has  been  no  statement  by  Premier  Castro  directly  criticizing  or 
expressing  his  opposition  to  the  Communists.  One  man  high  in  the  26th  of 
July  circles  said  this  week  that  the  revolutionary  Government  has  "no  intention 
of  taking  any  action  against  the  Communists,  who  have  the  same  liberty  in  Cuba 
as  anyone  else." 

The  numerical  strength  of  the  Communists  in  Cuba  at  present  is  difficult  to 
estimate.  However,  their  organizing  ability  and  the  dedication  of  their  leaders 
and  members  make  them  a  formidable  force  against  even  the  overwhelming 
majority  of  the  26th  of  July  movement,  according  to  the  opinion  of  many. 

At  one  time  during  the  forties  the  Communists  had  150,000  registered  mem- 
bers. They  began  to  achieve  strength  during  the  first  administration  of  former 
President  Fulgencio  Batista  (1940-44),  when  they  were  given  every  support, 
controlled  island  labor,  elected  senators  and  members  of  the  house  of  representa- 
tives and  were  given  cabinet  posts.  Later,  after  the  party  was  outlawed  bj'  the 
Prio  government  and  again  by  General  Batista  after  he  seized  power  in  1952,  the 
Communists  broke  down  the  party  to  a  hard  core  of  faithful. 

David  Salvador,  present  Secretary  of  the  Confederation  of  Cuban  Workers, 
which  controls  labor  of  the  island,  seemed  to  be  in  accord  with  the  Communists 
several  weeks  ago  when  he  declared,  "Cuba  can  never  be  with  the  United  States, 
which  oppresses  us." 

Castro  Support 

Premier  Castro  supported  Senor  Salvador  at  that  time  against  the  former 
President  of  Costa  Rica.  Col.  Jos6  Figueres,  who  was  here  as  a  guest  of  the  Gov- 
ernment. Speaking  to  a  huge  crowd  of  workers,  Colonel  Figueres  said  that  the 
Latin-American  countries  should  be  on  the  side  of  the  United  States  in  case  of 
war  between  that  country  and  the  Soviet  Union.  Dr.  Castro  replied  that  Cuba 
would  be  neutral. 

While  Dr.  Castro  said  in  the  United  States  during  his  visit  in  April  that  Cuba 
would  adhere  to  her  treaties  on  hemispheric  defense,  he  has  never  made  that 
statement  in  a  speech  to  the  Cuban  people. 

At  present  the  Communists  are  trying  to  build  up  their  power  in  the  island. 
There  are  no  poUtical  parties  urder  the  revolutionary  law,  but  the  Popular 
Socialist  Party,  the  name  by  which  the  Communists  have  been  known  since  the 
thirties,  works  to  organize  its  followers  for  any  coming  elections. 

The  old  leaders  of  the  Communist  Party  are  back  again.  Among  them  are 
Lazaro  Pena,  former  czar  of  labor  under  the  first  Batista  regime  and  the  Grau 
Administration  Bias  Roca,  regarded  as  the  top  Communist  leader,  and  Carlo 
Rafael  Rodriguez.  All  are  spea'-ing  over  the  radio  and  appearing  on  television, 
supporting  the  revolutionary  Government  and  attacking  the  United  States 
almost  daily. 

RADIO    STATION 

They  are  attempting  to  net  back  their  former  radio  station.  Mil  Diez,  which 
was  the  only  free  channel  station  in  Cuba,  This  station  was  taken  from  them  by 
tlie  Prio  administration. 

Since  last  January  1,  the  Communists  have  acquired  sufficient  funds  to  install 
a  modern  printing  plant  for  the  newspaper  Hoy,  the  former  plant  of  which  was 
destroyed  by  the  Prio  and  Batista  administrations.  There  seems  no  doubt  from 
reading  Hoy  that  the  Communists  are  highly  pleased  with  their  progress  under 
the  Castro  regime. 

The  policy  of  the  revolutionary  government  is  the  policy  of  Premier  Castro. 
So,  until  he  openly  opposes  the  Communists,  who  are  today  active  in  the  revolu- 
tion, few  people  here  v/ill  believe  there  has  been  any  serious  break  between  him 
and  them. 

It  is  pointed  out  in  some  quarters  here  that  it  would  not  be  an  act  of  political 
wisdom  at  present  for  Premier  Castro  to  make  an  open  break  with  the  Communists. 
While  they  are  still  in  the  minority,  they  are  powerful  as  a  highly  organized  and 
disciplined  group. 


66492   O  -  61  -5 


94  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

Mr.  Sour  WINE.  I  next  offer  an  article  from  the  Worker,  headed 
"CPUSA  Urges  Defense  of  Free  Cuba",  from  the  Worker  of  February 
8,  1959. 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  received. 

(Newspaper  article  referred  to  follows:) 

[The  Worker,  Feb.  8, 1959,  p.  3] 

CPUSA  Urges  Dilfense  of  Free  Cuba 

The  National  executive  committee  of  the  Communist  Party  last  week  called 
on  the  American  people  to  declare  their  support  of  a  "good  neighbor  policy  of 
friendship  to  the  Cuban  poeple  and  their  government  of  national  liberation  and 
demorcratic  reform."  The  statement,  signed  by  Eugene  Dennis,  national  secre- 
tary, and  Robert  Thompson,  executive  secretary,  pledged  the  support  of  the 
Communists  in  the  U.S.  to  do  their  utmost  to  "defend  Cuba's  rights  to  full  and 
untrammelled  sovereignty,  its  independence,  its  social  and  economic  welfare." 

The  statement  was  entitled  "Hands  oflf  Cuba  I  Solidarity  with  Free  Cuba!" 

The  text  follows: 

"The  Cuban  Revolution  has  had  a  most  profound  effect  upon  vast  sections  of 
the  North  American  poeple,  who  enthusisatically  hail  the  new  people's  power  as 
an  historic  rebuff  to  imperialism  and  native  tyranny  in  this  hemisphere. 

"  'Cuba  Libre'  is  a  cry  of  emanicipation  that  finds  great  support  among  Ameri- 
ca's working  people.  In  growing  numbers  they  welcome  the  democratic  aims 
of  Cuba's  new  government  and  its  revolutionary  justice  against  the  sadists,  the 
murderers,  the  arsonists  who  tortured  and  killed  untold  numbers  of  Cuban  patriots. 

"The  cables  today  that  tell  of  concealed  Batista  supporters  who  hurled  hand 
grenades  into  a  procession  in  Oriente  arouse  great  indignation  among  Americans. 
The  tragedy  in  Oriente  further  underscores  the  imperative  need  to  rid  Cuba  of 
Batista's  butchers  — to  bring  to  the  ber  of  the  people's  justice  those  who  are 
known,  as  well  as  to  ferret  out  all  hidden  supporters  of  the  Batista  dictatorship. 

"It  is  no  secret  that  Batista  and  his  followers  looted  the  national  wealth  of 
Cuba — looted  it  as  did  the  big  monopolies  of  Wall  Street,  which  have  been  robbing 
the  Cuban  people  for  generations.  Hence  the  urgency  of  firm  revolutionary 
justice  so  that  Batista  and  his  backers,  with  the  incalculable  millions  they  stole^ 
will  not  succeed  in  carrying  out  their  evil,  subversive  designs  in  Free  Cuba. 

"The  American  public  is  well  aware  of  the  Galindez  tragedy,  of  his  disap- 
pearance and  undoubted  death  at  the  hands  of  the  tyrant  Trujillo — that  same 
tyrant  who  is  today  the  host  of  Batista  and  other  deposed  blood-stained  dictators. 
And  it  should  be  clear  to  the  American  people  that  Batista,  like  Trujillo,  will  stop 
at  no  atrocity,  no  horror,  no  open  or  concealed  trickery,  to  sabotage  and  subvert 
the  people's  will.  "Increasingly,  it  is  recognized  by  Americans  that  the  horrors 
of  the  Batista  regime  could  not  have  been  possible  without  the  machinations, 
guidance  and  support  of  American  imperialism,  and  its  political  representatives. 
By  the  same  token,  it  should  be  evident  that  the  fresh  horrors  which  Batista, 
plots  in  his  efforts  to  overturn  the  revolution  could  only  be  effectively  perpetrated 
with  the  open  or  hidden  support  of  the  State  Department  and  the  FBI. 

"To  make  this  crystal  clear  is  the  sacred  responsibility  of  all  who  cherish 
freedom,  of  all  who  realize  the  glorious  advance,  made  by  the  Cuban  people — 
an  advance  which  is  part  of  the  great  national  liberation  movement  unfolding 
in  all  Latin  America  as  well  as  elsewhere  in  the  world. 

"The  mask  of  U.S.  imperiahsm  must  be  stripped  from  its  face  so  that  all  carv 
recognize  it  plainly  and  act  accordingly  to  prevent  its  open  or  concealed  inter- 
vention, which  remains  the  primary  danger  to  the  Cuban  Revolution. 

"We  American  Communists  hail  the  great  achievement  of  the  Cuban  people, 
and  the  new  power  that  was  led  to  victory  by  the  noble  forces  of  Fidel  Castro  and 
his  associates.  We  hail  the  Cuban  working  class  and  peasantry  whose  struggles, 
and  especially  the  general  strike  of  January  1,  played  so  important  a  role  in 
overthrowing  the  Batista  power.  We  hail  the  Cuban  women  who  fought  so 
valiantly  for  the  lives  of  their  sons  and  for  a  free  Cuba,  and  the  youth — workers, 
peasants,  students,  Negro  and  white — who  labored  so  bravely  to  write  thi& 
magnificant  chapter  in  the  history  of  the  Americas. 

"We  hail  the  glorious  Popular  Socialist  Party  of  Cuba — valiant,  selfless,, 
indestructible,  with  its  exemplary  record  as  patriots  and  fighters  for  national 
liberation  and  social  progress.  And  we  hail  its  slogan:  'Defend  the  Revolutioa 
and  Make  it  Advance.' 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  95 

"The  Communists  of  the  United  States  know  well  that  the  monopolies  of  Wall 
Street,  in  their  striving  to  wring  limitless  profits  from  the  sweat  and  blood  of  the 
Cuban  people,  constitute  the  greatest  peril  to  Cuba's  freedom  and  social  progress. 
These  monopolies  are  the  enemies  of  the  people  of  the  United  States,  as  well  as 
of  those  of  the  colonial  and  semicolonial  countries.  And  their  oppressive  role, 
their  intrigues  and  interference  in  the  internal  affairs  of  Cuba  and  the  other 
Latin  American  countries  has  intensified  the  exploitation  and  tax  burdens  of  the 
American  people  and  retarded  democratic  advance  in  the  United  States  no  less 
than  elsewhere  in  the  Western  Hemisphere. 

"We  American  Communists  pledge  our  utmost  to  defend  Cuba's  right  to  full 
and  untrammeled  sovereignty,  its  independence,  its  social  and  economic  velfare. 
"Hands  off  Cuba"  must  be  the  reply  of  America's  workers  and  farmers,  of  the 
Negro  people,  the  students  and  intellectuals,  to  all  open  or  covert  conspiracies  of 
the  big  trusts  and  their  agents  in  the  Government  to  interfere  in  any  way  with 
the  unfolding  of  Cuba's  sacred  aspirations  for  freedom,  social  advance  and  world 
peace. 

"We  call  upon  the  American  people  to  express  their  solidarity  with  these 
aspirations,  and  to  declare  their  support  of  a  good-neighbor  policy  of  friendship 
to  the  Cuban  people  and  their  government  of  national  liberation  and  democratic 
reform." 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Finally,  to  show  the  other  side  of  the  newspaper 
reports,  an  article  is  offered  from  the  New  York  Times  of  Thursday, 
July  16,  1959,  by  Herbert  L.  Matthews. 

(The  newspaper  article  referred  to  follows:) 

(The  New  York  Times,  Thursday,  July  16, 1959,  p.  1] 

Cuba  Has  a  One-Man  Rule  and  Is  Held  To  Be  Non-Red 
toothful  castro  regime,  beset  by  problems,  is  learning  by  doing 

(By  Herbert  L.  Matthews) 

Havana,  July  15. — Half  a  year  after  the  revolt  against  the  Batista  regime,  Cuba 
is  in  the  midst  of  the  first  great  social  revolution  in  Latin  America  since  the  Mexi- 
can Revolution  of  1910. 

The  overthrow  of  the  dictatorship  of  Gen.  Fulgencio  Batista  January  1,  1959, 
merely  ended  the  poHtical  phase  of  the  struggle  for  power.  In  the  process,  the 
entire  structure  of  government  as  it  then  existed  was  destroyed  and  a  revolution 
to  establish  a  different  social,  economic,  and  pohtical  status  was  begun. 

For  one  who  has  followed  the  struggle  closely  from  its  beginnings  2^  years  ago 
and  has  just  spent  nearly  2  weeks  in  Cuba,  it  is  possible  to  draw  an  outline  of  the 
situation  as  it  really  is.  This  being  a  pdriod  of  creation,  gestation,  and  transfor- 
mation, such  an  outline  cannot  be  simple  or  complete,  but  the  main  features  are 
clear  enough. 

Premier  Fidel  Castro,  the  young  man  who  headed  the  forces  that  fought  and 
wen  the  military  phase  of  the  struggle,  is  now  so  powerful  personally  that  for  all 
practical  purposes  he  is  the  Provisional  Government  of  Cuba. 

CASTRO    STILL    POPULAR 

His  popularity  has  not  dimirished  appreciably.  No  one  in  Cuba  has  any 
doubts  that  in  a  fair  election  he  would  win  at  lease  80  percent  of  the  votes,  atd 
more  likely  90  percent. 

The  powerful  enemies  Dr.  Castro  has  made  because  of  his  agrarian  reform  and 
economic  measures  are  few,  have  no  mass  backing  and  are  unarmed. 

This  is  not  a  Communist  revolution  in  any  sense  of  the  word  and  there  are  no 
Communists  in  positions  of  control.  This  is  the  overwhelming  consensus  among 
Cubans  in  the  best  position  to  know  and  this  writer  subscribes  to  that  opinion 
after  searching  inquiries  and  talks  with  Cubans  in  all  walks  of  life  and  with  many 
Americans. 

The  accusations  of  the  former  head  of  the  Cuban  Air  Force,  Maj.  Pedro  Luis 
Diaz  Lanz,  before  the  Senate  Internal  Security  Subcommittee  yesterday  are  re- 
jected by  virtually  all  Cubans.  It  is  stated  here  that  before  his  resignation 
Major  Diaz  was  removed  from  his  high  post  for  ir competence,  extravagance  and 
nepotism. 


96  COMMUNIST   THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

U.S.    ACTIONS   RESENTED 

The  use  to  which  his  defection  was  put  in  Washington  has  aroused  more  bitter- 
ness and  resentment  against  the  United  States  than  any  event  in  the  history  of 
Cuban-American  relations,  according  to  the  reactions  in  Havana  today. 

[President  Eisenhower  said  Wednesday  that  charges  of  communism  against 
Premier  Castro  were  not  easy  to  prove.  "The  United  States  has  made  no  such 
charges,"  the  President  noted.] 

There  seem  to  be  very  few  in  Cuba— and  one  need  have  no  hesitation  in  saying 
this — who  beheve  Fidel  Castro  is  a  Communist,  is  under  Communist  influence 
or  is  a  dupe  of  communism.  The  problem  of  communism,  which  aroused  little 
interest  in  Cuba  until  Americans  picked  it  up,  can  be  easily  summarized.  The 
point  of  view  among  the  most  experienced  and  knowledgeable  Cubans  is  as 
follows : 

There  are  no  Reds  in  the  Cabinet  and  none  in  high  positions  in  the  Govern- 
hient  or  army  in  the  sense  of  being  able  to  control  either  governmental  or  defense 
policies.  The  only  power  -worth  considering  in  Cuba  is  in  the  hands  of  Premier 
Castro,  who  is  not  only  not  Commui'ist  but  decidedly  anti-Communist  even 
though  he  does  not  consider  it  desirable  in  the  present  circumstances  to  attack 
or  destroy  the  Reds — as  he  is  in  a  position  to  do  any  time  he  wants. 

There  are  some  Communists  in  secondary  positions  in  such  fields  as  motion 
pictures  and  culture  and  a  few  in  the  army,  although  not  in  key  positions.  In 
addition,  there  is  the  much  less  clearly  defined  zone  of  fellow-travelers.  Communist 
sympathizers  and  those  who  are  tolerant  of  known  Communists  and  of  comniunism. 

Lists  of  supposed  Reds  and  sympathizers  circulate  in  the  various  embassies, 
newspaper  offices  and  undoubtedly  in  the  chancelleries  and  secret  services  of  all 
countries.  The  names  that  appear  on  all  lists  are  those  of  former  Communists, 
but  there  is  no  way  of  proving  that  any  but  card-bearing  party  members  are 
Communists  today.     Consequently,  there  is  a  great  field  for  controversy. 

Premier  Castro  and  his  followers  have  made  it  clear  that,  as  Cuban  patriots 
working  for  Cuba  and  the  Cuban  people,  they  are  against  communism  since  the 
Reds  have  entirely  different  aims  and  loyalties.  Moreover,  Cubans  agree  that  in 
present  circumstances  Dr.  Castro  is  not  going  to  share  his  power  with  anyone  or 
any  other  movement. 

The  main  point  that  Cubans  make  is  that  such  lists  do  not  give  anything  but  a 
small  part  of  the  Cuban  picture,  whatever  element  of  truth  they  may  contain. 

One  feature  of  Premier  Castro's  attitude  is  typical  of  the  Cuban  leaders.  This 
is  that  however  anti-Communist  they  feel,  they  will  not,  as  they  see  it,  humiliate 
themseh'es  by  acting  as  if  they  were  under  American  orders,  pressures  or  threats. 
The  attacks  and  suspicions  in  the  United  States  are  considered  here  to  be  strength- 
ening the  Communists  by  making  them  far  more  important  than  they  really  are. 

Even  the  agrarian  reform,  Cubans  point  out  with  irony,  is  not  at  all  what  the 
Communists  were  suggesting,  for  it  is  far  more  radical  and  drastic  than  the  Reds 
consider  wise  as  a  first  step  to  the  collectivization  they,  but  not  the  Cuban  leaders, 
want. 

The  fears  about  the  land  reform  are  economic  and  social.  It  is  so  drastic  and 
radical  that  experts  say  it  will  be  extremely  difficult  to  put  into  effect.  There 
are  not  enough  trained  men  and  not  enough  capital,  it  is  said,  and  the  reform 
requires  an  understanding  and  cooperation  from  the  peasants  and  workers  that 
cannot  be  counted  upon. 

It  is,  in  theory,  possible  that  the  reform  will  succeed;  it  is  more  probable  that 
it  will  fail  or  oniy  partly  succeed. 

To  students  of  the  Cuban  scene,  the  bad  or  weak  features  of  the  situation  today 
lie  in  other  fields  than  communism.  The  complete  upheaval  of  Cuban  life  would 
in  any  event  have  brought  enormous  and  multiple  problems. 

The  Cubans  say  that  to  have  maintained  law  and  order,  to  have  established 
the  first  completely  honest  regime  in  Cuban  history  and  to  get  a  vast  majority 
of  the  people  moving  behind  a  drastic  revolution  in  their  country  and  their  lives 
is  as  much  as  should  be  expected  in  6  months. 

ECONOMY    IN    DIFFICULTY 

Nevertheless,  there  is  a  great  deal  of  disorganization;  the  economy  has  con- 
tracted seriously  and  is  expected  to  get  worse;  the  radical  agrarian  reform  is 
an  enormous  gamble  that  has  done  injustice  to  many  large  and  medium  pro- 
prietors; the  budget  is  in  deficit;  investment  has  dwindled  to  a  trickle;  more 
inflation  threatens.  While  there  are  many  expert,  inteUigent  and  devoted 
ministers  and  public  servants,  there  is  also  much  inexperience,  amateurishness 
and  inconipetence. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  97 

This  a  revolt  of  youth,  and  youth  proverbially  has  its  fling,  and  learns  only 
by  trial  and  error.  Young  men  who  should  be  spending  years  learning  by  guid- 
ance and  experience  how  to  run  a  department  have  been  forced  suddenly  to  take 
control  of  ministries,  to  wield  great  authority  and  to  handle  many  millions  in 
pubUc  funds. 

The  "old"  men  in  the  Cabinet  and  in  the  top  banking  positions  are  about  45 
years  of  age,  and  while  they  are  authorities  in  their  field,  few  have  had  any  ex- 
perience in  government.  With  few  exceptions  the  old  politicians  and  public 
servants  were  so  discredited  that  no  one  wants  them  back. 

]\Ioreover,  the  young  man  who  single-handed  has  made  the  history  of  Cuba 
today,  Fidel  Castro,  towers  over  all  his  associates  in  power  and  popularity  to  such 
a  degree  that  one  can  understand  why  Cubans  sav:  "Fidel  is  No.  1;  there  is  no 
No.  2." 

Thus,  one  sees  in  Cuba  the  paradox  of  a  great  centralization  of  power  with  an 
equally  great  dispersion  of  authority,  because  no  one  man  can  deal  with  every 
problem  that  arises. 

It  is  because  everyone  tries  to  see  Dr.  Castro  and  because  he  tries  to  do  every- 
thing and  usually  is  the  only  one  who  can  get  something  done  that  there  is  such 
disorga'iization  in  Cuban  affairs.  Ministers  and  heads  of  departments  soniotim.es 
wait  weeks  before  they  can  see  him  on  urgent  problems.  Decrees  pile  up  un- 
signed. 

CASTRO    IS    IMPATIENT 

Dr.  Castro  is  so  sure  of  himself,  so  full  of  ideas,  so  fabulously  energetic  and  so 
popular  that  to  get  in  his  way  is  like  bucking  a  steamroller. 

But  he  is  not  yet  33;  his  experience  in  economics,  politics  and  administration 
began  January  1.  He  knows  what  he  wants;  he  is  impatient  of  many  rules  of 
orthodox  politics  and  economy  (although  he  has  a  healthj^  fear  of  inflation)  and 
he  is  a  young  man  in  a  hurry. 

His  method  of  putting  over  his  ideas,  molding  public  opinion  and  even,  up  to 
a  point,  conducting  government,  is  unique.  This,  in  a  manner  of  speaking,  is 
government  by  television. 

Premier  Castro  spends  incredible  hours  every  week  before  the  television,  ex- 
plaining, cajoling,  threatening,  promising,  announcing — at  times  it  would  seem 
on  the  spur  of  the  moment — new  policies. 

Three  hours  is  a  short  speech  for  him;  four  to  six  a  normal  one.  He  shows  up 
from.  1  to  2  hours  late  and  thinks  nothing  of  talking  until  3  in  the  morning  or 
later. 

Premier  Castro  is  avoiding  elections  in  Cuba  for  two  reasons.  He  feels  that  his 
social  revolution  now  has  dynamism  and  vast  popular  consent,  and  he  does  not 
want  to  interrupt  the  process.  Moreover,  most  observers  would  agree  that  Cubans 
today  do  not  want  elections.  The  reason  is  that  elections  in  the  past  have  merely 
merely  meant  to  them  the  coming  of  corrupt  politicians  seeking  the  spoils  of 
power. 

Those  who  argue  in  favor  of  elections  say  it  is  the  duty  of  the  leaders  of  a  country 
to  teach  the  values  of  fair  elections,  that  a  popular  mandate  and  a  legislature 
are  necessary  if  Cuba  is  to  establish  democracy.  Those  urging  elections  add  that 
balloting  would  show  the  weakness  of  the  Communists  and  make  a  good  impression 
abroad. 

The  best  guess  is  that  Cuban  elections  still  are  2  to  3  years  off. 

As  far  as  the  economy  in  general  is  concerned,  authorities  point  out  that  there 
are  three  possibilities.  Either  there  is  private  investment  or  public  investment  or 
great  unemployment.  Since  the  last  is  ruled  out,  and  since  private  investors 
are  frightened  or  antagonistic  or  waiting  to  see  what  happens,  nothing  remains 
but  public  investment.     This  means  inflation  and  deficit  financing. 

BUSINESS    STAGNATING 

It  is  hoped  that  the  stimulus  to  business  and  a  belief  that  Dr.  Castro  and  his 
26th  of  July  Movement  are  here  to  stay  a  long  time  and  will  bring  about  a  normal 
adjustment  in  the  course  of  time.  At  present,  business  is  flourishing  in  some  con- 
sumer goods  but  on  the  whole  it  is  stagnant  and  there  is  very  little  foreign 
investment. 

The  question  of  how  to  make  the  best  of  the  situation  is  basic  to  all  calculations, 
internal  and  external.  Premier  Castro's  power  and  popularity  are  such  that 
realism  demands  taking  a  long  view.  This  affects  all  business  and  diplomatic 
considerations,  and  since  Cuba  is  so  close  to  the  United  States  in  every  sense, 
Americans  are  more  affected  than  anyone. 


98  COMMUNIST   THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

For  this  reason  the  grave  disagreements  that  have  arisen  between  Americans 
and  Cubans,  the  antagonism  against  Cuba  in  the  United  States  and  against  the 
United  States  in  Cuba  are  considered  here  to  be  exceptionally  disturbing. 

Another  foreign  issue  with  which  Cuba  is  deeply  concerned  is  the  Dominican 
Republic.  The  young  Cuban  revolutionaries  consider  themselves  as  paladins  of 
freedom  and  social  justice  in  all  of  Latin  America.  Their  chief  target  is  General- 
issimo Rafael  Leonidas  Trujillo   Molina,  dictator  of  the  Dominican  Republic. 

For  the  time  being,  at  least,  encouragement  of  invasion  of  other  countries  like 
the  Dominican  Republic  and  Nicaragua  seems  to  have  ended.  The  emphasis 
from  now  on  is  expected  to  come  in  the  diplomatic  field  and  especially  in  the 
Organization  of  American  States. 

At  the  same  time,  Premier  Castro  does  believe  that  he  and  his  26th  of  July 
Movement  represent  the  wave  of  the  future  in  Latin  America,  not  just  in  Cuba. 
Cubans  are  convinced  that  his  voice  will  be  heard  all  over  the  Western  Hemi- 
sphere, and  it  is  the  voice  of  the  angry  young  man  of  our  times. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  I  would  like  to  show  this  next  item  to  the  witness 
and  ask  him  if  he  knows  that  to  be  a  Communist  indoctrination  paper. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Yes;  I  do. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Utilized  for  party  instruction? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  That  is  the  directive  that  the  Communist  Party 
of  the  United  States  sends  out  to  orientate  its  members  in  favor  of 
the  Cuban  revolution,  and  Castro,  and  is  very,  very  vitriolic. 

Senator  Keating.  What  was  your  last  comment? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Very,  very  vitriolic;  made  my  blood  boil  when  I 
read  it. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  May  that  be  received? 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  peceived. 

(Document  entitled  "The  Cuban  Revolution  and  the  Tasks  of  the 
Communist  Party,  U.S.A.,"  follows:) 

The  Cuban  Revolution  and  the  Tasks  of  the  Communist  Party,  U.S.A. 

I.    THE  significance  OF  THE  CUBAN  REVOLUTION 

Castro's  prolonged  resistance  against  the  Batista  tyranny  "has  inflamed  the 
hearts  not  only  of  his  own  people,  but  of  people  all  around  the  globe.  Not 
since  Sandino  resisted  the  American  Marines  for  six  years  in  the  Nicaraguan 
Mountains,  has  any  Latin  American  figure  so  caught  the  imagination  of  the 
world  as  Fidel  CastTO,"  writes  Carleton  Beals  in  The  Nation  (Jan.  17,  1959). 

The  overthrow  of  the  Batista  dictatorship  in  January  1959  by  Castro  and  the 
Cuban  people's  liberation  forces  is  a  tremendous  victory  for  democracy,  peace, 
and  social  progress  for  the  peoples  of  the  world.  It  was  an  uncompromising  vic- 
tory without  the  mediation  or  last-minute  move  by  U.S.  imperialism. 

Occurring  only  ninety  miles  from  Florida,  on  the  very  doorstep  of  the  United 
States,  this  historic  event  represents  a  profound  defeat  for  American  imperialism, 
which  armed  and  supported  the  Batista  dictatorship.  On  the  other  hand,  it 
has  aroused  the  admiration  of  the  American  people.  The  victory  aids  the  struggle 
of  the  American  people  against  the  U.S.  trusts,  and  will  give  a  fresh  impulse  to 
the  freedom  struggles  of  the  Negro  people. 

It  is  highly  significant  that  U.S.  imperialism  was  not  able  to  intervene  to  pre- 
vent the  people's  victory.  It  sent  in  marines  at  one  stage  of  the  struggle  but  it 
was  forced  by  world  public  opinion  to  withdraw  them.  Little  Cuba  delivered  a 
staggering  defeat  to  the  imperialist  Colossus.  This  indicates  the  power  of  the 
socialist,  anti-imperialist  and  democratic  forces  on  a  world  scale. 

The  events  in  Cuba  and  Venezuela  show  that  under  the  new  world  conditions 
it  is  possible  for  the  oppressed  people  of  Latin  America,  when  it  is  united  and 
fights  mUitantly,  to  win  national  liberation  despite  the  power  and  nearness  of 
U.S.  imperialism. 

The  anticolonial,  national  Hberation  struggle,  which  embraces  Asia  and  Africa, 
is  also  in  full  swing  in  Latin  America.  The  Cuban  struggle  stirred  the  Latin 
American  peoples  everywhere  and  the  victory  will  heighten  and  broaden  it  still 
further. 

National  reaction  and  American  imperialism  may  save  a  little  longer  the  re- 
maining dictatorships  in  Latin  America.  They  may  even  save  themselves  for  a 
while   by   demagogically   making  some   concessions   to  their  oppressed  people, 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  99 

like  the  present  Trujillo  efforts  to  raise  the  very  low  basic  wage  of  the  Dominican 
worker  with  the  blessing  of  the  International  Labor  Office.  But  the  strength  of 
the  liberation  movement  is  shown  by  the  destruction  in  Latin  America  of  half  a 
dozen  dictators  during  the  last  four  years. 

On  September  19,  1955,  General  Juan  Domingo  Peron  had  to  abandon  the 
presidency  (read  dictatorship)  of  Argentina. 

On  December  13,  1956,  Paul  G.  Magliore,  dictator  of  Haiti,  was  forced  into 
€xile. 

On  May  10,  1957,  dictator  Gustavo  Rojas  Pinilla  of  Colombia  was  thrown 
out  of  office. 

On  January  23,  1958,  dictator  Marcos  Perez  Jiminez  of  Venezuela  was  ousted 
and  fled  to  Trujillo's  Dominican  Republic. 

Four  dictators  still  remain:  Alfredo  Stroessner  who  became  dictator  of  Paraguay 
after  forcing  the  duly  elected  president  Frederico  Chaves  to  resign  in  1954. 
General  Rafael  Leonidas  Trujillo  y  Medina  has  been  dictator  of  the  Dominican 
Republic  for  the  last  twenty-eight  years.  Francois  Duvalier,  who  became  presi- 
dent at  a  national  election  in  1957,  has  become  for  all  intents  and  purposes  Haiti's 
dictator,  after  the  powers  granted  to  him  following  the  crushing  of  the  last  July 
rebellion.  Then  there  is  Luis  Somoza  who  inherited  the  presidency  of  Nicaragua 
after  his  father  Anastasio  was  assassinated  in  September  1956. 

There  is  no  doubt  that  as  the  Cubans  continue  their  revolution  and  make 
efforts  to  take  away  the  usurped  rights  and  privileges  of  U.S.  imperialism  in  Cuba, 
the  danger  of  intervention  will  grow.  It  is  essential  that  the  democratic  freedom- 
loving  forces  in  this  country  realize  the  danger  and  act  to  arouse  public  opinion 
in  the  United  States. 

II.    THE   BATISTA    DICTATORSHIP   AND    U.S.    IMPERIALISM 

BatLsta  established  his  dictatorship  by  a  coup  on  March  10,  1952.  He  ruled 
by  bloody  terror,  by  torture,  airplane  bombings  of  peoples  (with  Napalm  bombs) , 
executions  of  workers'  leaders,  wholesale  imprisonment  and  shootings  of  rebels. 
Twenty  thousand  patriots — men,  women,  and  children — were  killed.  "I  have 
seen  reports  of  human  fingernails  and  toenails  yanked  out  of  live  victims  and 
human  eyes  that  were  gouged  out.  It  is  almost  a  Buchenwald  story,  the  crimes 
committed  by  this  clever  little  dictator  so  pampered  by  our  State  Department  in 
both  Democratic  and  Republican  days."  Carleton  Beals,  in  The  Nation,  Janu- 
ary 24,  1959. 

Refugees  from  Batista's  tyranny,  of  which  there  were  many  thousands,  were 
harassed  in  the  U.S.  by  immigration  authorities.  The  Batista  clique  enriched 
itself  by  outright  corruption,  sale  of  concessions  and  in  countless  other  ways. 
The  thefts  ran  into  billions. 

The  Batista  tyranny,  as  the  Popular  Socialist  Party  (the  Cuban  Communist 
Party)  points  out,  represented  a  government  of  unconditional  submission  to 
imperialism,  to  the  foreign  banks  and  corporations,  to  the  big  landowners,  to  the 
big  import  merchants  and  sugar  magnates  and  other  producers.  That  is  why  the 
Batista  government  was  an  antinational,  anti-working-class  and  antipeople's 
regime. 

These  forces  feared  the  growing  movement  of  the  workers,  peasants,  intellectuals, 
and  the  national  bourgeoisie  for  greater  democratic  freedom  and  for  freeing  them- 
selves from  the  domination  of  U.S.  imperialism  which  has  ruled  the  country  for 
the  past  sixty  years  and  which  today  owns  70  percent  of  the  wealth  of  the  country. 

The  trade  union  center,  the  Confederation  of  Cuban  Workers,  was  transformed 
into  a  government  agency.  The  trade  union  leaders  selected  by  the  workers  were 
removed  from  office  by  the  government  and  corrupt  and  subservient  men  were 
designated  in  their  places.  The  dictatorship  ruthlessly  intervened  in  union 
matters  on  all  levels,  dismissed,  murdered,  and  imprisoned  those  loyal  to  the 
workers'  cause. 

Batista  would  not  have  been  able  to  remain  in  power  without  the  direct  military 
aid  of  the  U.S.  State  Department  which  supplied  the  guns,  planes,  and  ammuni- 
tion from  the  U.S.  Naval  base  at  Guatanamo  and  through  the  Dominican 
government. 

"Our  military  men  were  advisers  and  trainers  of  the  Cuban  army  .  .  .  Our 
commanders  in  the  area  decorated  the  worst  killers  of  the  Cuban  Army.  Diplo- 
matic and  army  banquets  with  the  dictator  were  frequent  and  lavish."  (Beals, 
The  Nation,  January  17,  1959.) 

Moreover,  the  State  Department  and  Ambassador  E.  T.  Smith  intervened 
directly  in  the  affairs  of  the  government  and  virtually  dictated  Batista's  actions  to 
the  very  end. 


100  COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH    THE    CARIBBEAN 

As  Herbert  Matthews  writes  in  the  New  York  Times,  January  4,  1959: 
"History  will  prove  that  the  dictator  did  have  U.S.  support  for  much  of  the 
greater  part  of  his  second  seven  years  as  the  sole  ruler.  The  U.S.  ambassadors 
either  by  inclination  or  under  orders  from  the  State  Department  were  friendly  to 
Batista  and  openly  so.  Ambassador  E.  T.  Smith,  now  in  Havana,  also  openly 
showed  his  hostility  towards  Fidel  Castro  and  this  is  something  every  well-in- 
formed Cuban  knows." 

III.    BRIEF  ECONOMIC  AND  SOCIAL  FACTS 

U.S.  imperialism  has  dominated  the  country  economically  and  politically  for 
more  than  half  a  century.  Cuba,  with  a  population  of  about  six  and  one-half 
billions,  is  one  of  the  largest  of  the  Caribbean  Islands  and  one  of  the  wealthiest. 
But  its  wealth  is  largely  in  the  hands  of  American  banks  and  industrialists. 
"Economically  Cuba  is  as  much  a  part  of  the  U.S.  as  if  the  90-mile  stretch  of  water 
between  it  and  Key  West  never  existed,"  wrote  Robert  M.  Hallet,  Latin  American 
expert  for  the  Christian  Science  Monitor  in  1956. 

U.S.  monopolies'  sales  amounted  to  $1,425  millions  in  1953. 

All  raw  materials  and  all  public  utilities  are  owned  by  U.S.  monopolies.  Three- 
fourths  of  the  tillable  land  is  in  the  hands  of  foreigners. 

The  sugar  industry  accounts  for  75  percent  of  the  income.  This  is  controlled 
by  161  sugar  "centrals"  most  of  which  are  controlled  by  U.S.  interests  that  has 
75  million  dollars  invested  in  the  industry.  In  1952  the  Cuban  Atlantic  Sugar 
Company  grabbed  profits  equal  to  forty  percent  of  its  capital  in  1952.  Other 
American  corporations  received  like  sums.  The  lack  of  a  real  estate  tax  increases 
their  profits. 

The  United  States  sets  annual  quotas  on  sugar  imports  from  Cuba  and  other 
countries.  In  this  way  the  Big  Business  interests  exercise  a  stranglehold  on  the 
country  since  the  U.S.  is  by  far  the  largest  buyer. 

The  U.S.  government  built  and  owns  a  one  hundred  million  dollar  nickel  re- 
finery which  is  exploited  by  the  National  Lead  Company. 

International  Telephone  and  Telegraph  Company  has  twenty  million  dollars 
invested  and  operates  through  its  subsidiary,  the  Cuban  Telephone  Company. 

Standard  Oil  of  New  Jersey  has  a  refinery  at  Belot  with  a  capacity  of  35,000 
barrels  a  day. 

Wages  of  the  Cuban  workers  are  one-fourth  of  those  paid  in  the  U.S.,  while 
prices  are  about  the  same  as  in  our  country.  About  500,000  Cuban  workers  are 
dependent  on  seasonal  employment  in  the  sugar  industry. 

A  substantial  part  of  the  population  of  Cuba  are  Negroes. 

The  overwhelming  majority  of  the  people  of  Latin  America,  and  this  applies 
to  Cuba,  live  in  miserable  conditions.  "They  are  subject  to  a  high  incidence  of 
disease,  malnutrition,  and  illiteracy.  *  *  *  Two  thirds  of  the  people  are  physically 
undernourished."      (U.S.  over  Latin  America,  International  Publishers,  1955.) 

The  tuberculosis  mortalitv  rate  in  Cuba  is  169.4  per  100,000.  (In  the  U.S. 
in  1953  it  was  12.3  per  100,000.)  Based  on  1954  census  figures,  infant  mortality 
was  99  per  1,000  live  births.     (In  the  U.S.  it  was  29.) 

IV.    THE    people's    LIBERATION    MOVEMENT ITS    CL.\SS    COMPOSITION 

The  opposition  to  Batista  began  soon  after  his  coup  of  March  1952.  It  grew 
in  strength  and  embraced  the  vast  majority  of  people.  It  was  given  great  force 
by  Castro  who  on  July  26,  1953,  led  an  attack  on  the  Moncada  army  barracks  in 
Santiago  de  Cuba.  This  was  the  origin  of  the  July  26  movement  by  which  name 
the  Castro  followers  are  known.  This  failed.  Castro  was  captured  and  im- 
prisoned but  released  in  a  general  amnesty  in  1954.  From  his  exile  in  Mexico  he 
organized  an  expedition  and  in  1956  landed  with  90  men  on  the  Southern  coast 
of  Oriente  Province.  All  but  a  dozen  were  killed  or  captured.  Castro  and  the 
few  rebels  went  into  the  Sierra  Maestro  mountains  and  organized  the  struggle. 

At  first  his  numbers  were  a  mere  handful  of  3'outh  but  this  gradually  grew  with 
the  enrollment  of  workers,  peasants,  intellectuals,  small  and  medium  bourgeoisie. 
The  whole  youth  were  behind  Castro  and  the  liberation  forces. 

"The  tyranny  was  overthrown  because  the  entire  people  opposed  Batista  and 
his  regime  and  fought  actively  for  its  overthrow  in  every  possible  way  and  on  all 
fronts:  in  the  armed  struggles,  in  strikes  and  in  the  final  general  strike,  in  nu- 
merous civilian  struggles,  in  mass  struggles  of  the  workers  and  farmers,  by  means 
of  propaganda,  by  boycotting  the  fake  elections  and  fighting  against  the  entire 
Batista  agents  in  the  various  organizations  (such  as  the  treacherous  and  corrupt 
gang  of  Eusibio  Mujal  in  the  trade  unions).     Ninety  percent  of  the  rebel  forces 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  101 

are  composed  of  farmers,  agricultural  workers,  city  workers,  and  students  of  every 
revolutionary  trend."  (From  the  thesis  of  the  Popular  Socialist  Party  on  the 
Present  Situation.) 

While  the  national  bourgeoisie  and  petty  bourgeoisie  had  hegemony  in  the 
movement,  a  decisive  part  was  played  by  the  working  class,  as  the  nationwide 
general  strike  indicated,  and  by  the  Communists  (the  Popular  Socialist  Party). 
Leadmg  Communist  trade  unionists  were  murdered  by  the  Batista  forces. 

The  Popular  Socialist  Party  was  an  active  force  in  establishing  a  loose  coalition 
of  all  liberation  forces.  This  party  has  a  long  history  of  struggle  against  reaction 
and  imperialism.  It  arose  in  1925  and  was  in  the  front  ranks  of  struggle  in  over- 
throwing the  Machado  dictatorship  through  the  general  strike  in  August  1933. 
Among  the  organizers  and  leaders  of  the  party  from  its  inception  were  people  who 
embody  the  best  traditions  of  struggle  of  the  working  class  of  Cuba,  such  as  the 
organizers  of  the  Party,  Carlo  Balino,  friend  of  Jose  Marti,  the  great  Cuban 
liberator,  and  Julio  Antonio  Mella,  Cuban  youth  leader  and  fighter  against  im- 
perialism. Mella  was  assassinated  by  orders  of  Machado  in  Mexico  City  on 
January  10,  1929.  Other  well  known  leaders  include  lazar  Pena,  tobacco  workers' 
leaders  and  later  general  secretary  of  the  Confederation  of  Labor;  Bias  Roca, 
shoe  worker  and  Secretary  of  the  Socialist  Party;  and  Juan  Marinello,  its  presi- 
dent, university  professor  and  one  of  the  great  writers  in  the  Spanish  language. 

The  Popular  Socialist  Party  took  an  active  part  in  the  struggle  against  the 
tyranny,  aiding  it  in  every  way,  and  worked  for  a  popular  coalition  government, 
for  national  independence,  for  democracy,  economic  development,  social  progress, 
and  peace. 

A  strong  contingent  of  party  members  and  sympathizers  belonged  to  the  rebel 
forces  and  many  of  them  distinguished  themselves  for  their  bravery  and  conduct. 
The  party  stimulated  a  great  number  of  mass  actions  by  workers  and  peasants 
which  served  to  undermine  the  dictatorship  (protest  movements  against  bombings, 
boycott  actions  in  the  elections,  strikes,  etc.).  It  popularized  the  program  of 
essential  reforms,  and  made  important  contributions  in  spurring  on  the  national 
mobilization  against  the  Batista  tyranny. 

V.    THE    PRESENT    SITUATION    AND    THE    OUTLOOK    FOR    THE    REVOLUTION 

The  military  victory  of  the  Cuban  revolution  was  complete  and  total.  The 
liberation  forces  did  not  compromise  with  reaction  but  swept  it  out  of  power. 
They  destroyed  the  military  and  police  power  of  the  old  regime  and  power  passe'd 
into  the  hands  of  the  rebel  forces. 

The  rebel  government  is  completely  democratic  and  is  subject  to  no  force  other 
than  the  rebel  army  and  the  revolutionary  and  social  organizations  which  backed 
the  liberation  movement. 

The  new  government  is  free  of  any  submission  to  American  imperialism.  The 
social  composition  of  those  who  compose  the  new  government  is  primarily  petty 
bourgeoisie,  representatives  of  the  small  and  middle  bourgeoisie,  professionals, 
rich  farmers,  and  small  landowners. 

The  thesis  of  the  Communists  states  that: 

"Such  social  forces,  as  is  well  known,  although  they  do  not  bow  to  imperialism 
and  resist  it,  do  not  work  in  consistent  struggle  but  waver  in  the  face  of  economic 
and  social  measures  that  have  to  be  adopted  to  carry  forward  the  national  libera- 
tion struggle,  economic  development  and  social  progress. 

"These  forces  limit  the  anti-imperialist  and  revolutionary  orientation  by  their 
desire  to  maintain  the  capitalist  system  at  all  costs.  At  the  same  time  the  social 
support  of  the  new  government  rests  not  only  on  the  classes  and  strata  which 
compose  it  but  also  on  the  farmers  and  workers  who  have  given  their  full  support 
to  the  revolution  and  who  have  their  own  concrete  demands  for  fulfilling  the  revo- 
lution." 

All  this  means  that  from  the  social  viewpoint  the  new  power  rests  on  the  popular 
forces  (workers,  farmers,  petty  bourgeoisie  and  the  national  industrial  bourgeoisie.) 
"It  cannot  be  termed  a  government  of  revolutionary  and  popular  coalition." 
(From  thesis  of  Popular  Socialist  Party) 

Main  Communist  proposals  for  advancement  of  the  revolution 

The  Popular  Socialist  Party  supports  the  new  government  and  seeks  to  maintain 
the  utmost  unity  against  native  reaction  and  U.S.  imperialism.  At  the  same  time 
it  strives  to  have  the  government  represent  more  fully  the  coalition  of  forces  which 
achieved  the  victory,  particularly  the  farmers  and  proletariat. 

In  its  thesis  issued  on  January  6  the  Party  is  pressing  to  "defend  the  revolution 
and  to  enable  it  to  advance." 


102  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

As  Joseph  North  writes  in  The  Worker  (February  15,  -1959),  the  thesis  "calls 
for  strengthening  a  People's  Army,  built  around  those  who  took  arms  against 
Batista."  It  urges  a  formal  legislative  confirmation  of  the  new  rights  won  by  the 
people  and  guaranteeing  those  rights.  It  makes  concrete  proposals  for  a  demo- 
cratic constitution. 

It  proposes  the  immediate  enactment  of  the  agrarian  law  written  during  the 
revolutionary  struggle  and  further  steps  to  "complete  agrarian  reform  until  we 
end  latifundism — the  ownership  of  the  vast  plantations."  Toward  that  end  and 
to  improve  the  conditions  of  the  farmers  the  thesis  emphasizes  the  importance  of 
the  organization  of  a  farmers  movement. 

It  calls  for  a  genuinely  effective  policy  to  end  race  discrimination,  for  the 
restoration  of  education,  to  guarantee  trade  union  rights  and  to  reorganize  the 
trade  union  movement  on  democratic  lines. 

It  proposes  measures  to  achieve  the  full  sovereignty  of  the  nation,  eliminating 
all  foreign  interventionist  agencies — and  to  end  the  U.S.  Naval  base  at  Guanta- 
namo.  Also  to  make  progress  toward  nationalizing  public  services  that  are  owned 
by  foreign  interests  and  to  annul  colonial  concessions  which  Batista  gave  the 
imperialist  monopolies  "and  undertake  the  exploitation  of  oil  to  improve  the 
development  of  a  national  industry." 

Further  it  calls  for  measures  for  the  reconstruction  of  destroyed  areas  and  for 
achieving  a  maximum  sugar  crop.  It  also  proposes  the  strengthening  of  relations 
with  the  peoples  of  Latin  America  to  defend  their  common  interests  and  to  main- 
tain peace.  Towards  the  same  end  to  establish  diplomatic,  cultural,  scientific 
and  economic  relations  with  Asian  and  African  countries  recently  freed  from 
colonialism  and  to  develop  trade  w-h  the  socialist  countries. 

To  achieve  this  program,  the  thesis  urges  the  upbuilding  of  the  Popular  Socialist 
Party  and  its  press  and  the  Young  Socialist  organization. 

<■  VI.    THE    POLICY    OF    U.S.    IMPERIALISM   AFTER   THE    REVOLUTION 

After  the  victory  of  the  Castro  forces,  U.S.  imperialism  through  its  press  began 
a  campaign  to  discredit  the  revolutionary  forces  by  charging  the  government  with 
callous  murder  in  its  treatment  of  the  Batista  agents.  By  its  campaign  it  sought 
to  retain  intact  the  reactionary  forces  in  the  government  and  also  to  lay  the 
ground  for  possible  armed  intervention.  At  the  same  time  it  exercised  pressure  on 
rightward-leaning  elements  in  the  government,  seeking  to  divide  the  ranks  of  the 
government  and  revolutionary  forces.  • 

This  failed.  The  government  continued  to  mete  out  revolutionary  justice  to 
the  assassins  of  the  people.  It  would  be  a  mistake,  however,  to  underestimate 
the  power  of  reaction  and  of  U.S.  imperialism  which  still  dominates  the  country 
economically.  U.S.  imperialism  by  economic,  political,  and  possibly  military 
pressure  will  seek  to  retain  its  special  privileges  and  control  of  the  country.  It 
seeks  to  boycott  Cuban  industry  and  bring  the  revolutionary  forces  to  capitulate 
or  disastrously  compromise  themselves.  It  is  also  carrying  on  an  anti-Communist 
campaign. 

The  struggle  of  the  Cuban  people  to  consolidate  and  advance  the  revolution  will 
go  on  for  some  period  of  time,  at  all  stages  of  which  it  will  encounter  the  resistance 
of  U.S.  imperialism. 

VII.  THE  TASKS  OF  THE  CP  AND  THE  DEMOCRATIC  FORCES  IN  THE  U.S. 

Under  these  conditions  great  responsibility  falls  on  the  Communist  Party,  and 
all  democratic  forces  of  the  U.S.,  in  the  first  place  labor,  to  aid  the  Cuban  people 
and  to  block  and  nullify  the  efforts  of  U.S.  imperialism  to  reestablish  its  domina- 
tion of  the  country. 

In  the  past  our  party  gave  substantial  aid  to  the  struggles  of  the  Latin-American 
people.  As  William  Z.  Foster  wrote  in  History  of  the  CPUSA,  our  party  was 
active  in  "organizing  the  All- American  Anti-imperialist  League  in  1924  *  *  * 
gave  vigorous  support  to  August  Cesar  Sandino  *  *  *  and  constantly  kept  the 
Latin  American  question  before  the  American  working  class." 

In  recent  years,  however,  there  has  been  a  severe  decline  in  attention  and  aid 
to  the  struggles  of  the  Latin  American  people.  This  is  a  great  weakness  in  inter- 
nationalism which  harms  the  struggle  of  the  American  people. 

The  American  labor  movement  and  the  people  cannot  make  continuing  advance 
if  they  do  not  fight  against  the  oppression  of  the  Latin  American  people  by  U.S. 
imperialism.  On  the  contrary,  failure  to  take  up  this  struggle  can  only  result  in 
setbacks  and  defeat  for  labor  and  democracy. 


COMMUNIST   THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  103 

The  victory  of  the  Cuban  revolution,  which  follows  on  the  heels  of  the  series  of 
revolutions  in  other  Latin  American  countries,  emphasizes  the  extreme  import- 
ance of  these  great  events  for  our  country  and  for  our  party.  Major  attention 
must  be  given  to  rally  the  support  of  the  American  people  behind  the  Cuban  people. 

(1)  It  is  essential  to  call  for  resolutions,  letters,  and  other  expressions  of  solid- 
arit}^  and  support  to  the  Cuban  revolution.  Delegations  from  trade  unions  and 
people's  organizations  to  Cuba  should  be  encouraged. 

(2)  Also  letters  and  resolutions  should  be  addressed  to  President  Eisenhower, 
to  the  State  Department,  to  Congressmen  and  Senators  protesting  the  support 
given  to  the  Batista  regime  in  the  past  and  to  demand  no  intervention  in  the 
internal  affairs  of  Cuba. 

(3)  In  Latin  American  and  in  Negro  and  white  communities,  efforts  should  be 
made  to  establish  committees  to  aid  the  Cuban  revolution.  Such  committees  can 
push  solidarity  actions  of  various  types,  such  as  meetings,  delegations,  etc. 

(4)  It  is  necessary  to  bring  the  truth  and  meaning  of  the  events  in  Cuba  to  the 
trade  unions  and  people's  organizations  and  to  the  people  of  the  communities  by 
means  of  leaflets,  forums,  pamphlets  and  by  lectures  and  discussions  in  organiza- 
tions. 

(5)  A  leaflet  has  been  issued  by  the  State  Committee.  A  popular  pamphlet 
(10  cents)  by  Joseph  North  in  English  and  one  in  Spanish  is  ready.  All  clubs 
should  order  and  distribute  this  pamphlet. 

Finally  we  urge  all  community  and  industrial  clubs,  sections,  and  counties  to 
review  work  in  relation  to  Puerto  Rican  workers  and  communities  and  to  take 
practical  measures  to  ensure  a  series  of  steps  which  will  improve  contacts,  organ- 
ization, and  aid  to  the  Puerto  Rican  people. 

Reading: 

(1)  Joseph  North,  Cuba's  Revolution:  I  Saw  the  People's  Victory,  New  Century 

Publishers. 

(2)  Lazaro  Pena,  "The  Cuban  People  and  the  Batista  Tyranny,"  Political  Affairs, 

February  1959. 

(3)  P.  Reyes,  "Liberation  Movement  in  Latin  America,"  World  Marxist  Review, 

January  1959. 

(4)  U.S.  over  Latin  America.     International  Publishers. 

(5)  William  Z.  Foster,  History  of  the  CPUS  A,  pages  365-367. 

(6)  William  Z.  Foster,  Outline  History  of  the  Americas, 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  I  offer,  Mr.  Chairman,  on  the  question  of  relations 
between  the  Communist  Party  in  Chile  and  the  Castro  regime,  first 
an  article  from  the  New  York  Times  of  May  11,  1959,  written  by 
Tad  Szulc.  ^ 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  article  referred  to  follows:) 

[The  Xew  York  Times,  May  11,  1959,  p.  1] 

Chilean  Red  Asks  Ties  With  Castro 

hails  cuban'  movement  as  worthy  of  collaboration  efforts  by  the  party 

(By  Tad  Szulc) 

Santiago,  Chile,  May  10. — Fidel  Castro,  Cuba's  Premier,  and  his  move- 
ment were  described  today  as  the  best  example  of  the  "progressive  burgeoisie" 
with  which  Latin-American  Communists  should  collaborate. 

This  policy  line  for  hemsiphere  Communists  was  enunciated  by  Luis  Corvalan, 
secretary  general  of  the  Chilean  Communist  Party,  in  a  speech  before  its  central 
committee. 

"We  must  march  with  the  burgeoisie,  and  Cuba  is  the  example,"  he  declared. 

His  statements  seeking  to  identify  the  Communists  with  Dr.  Castro's  regime 
came  a  day  after  10  United  States  Ambassadors  in  South  America  had  ended 
consultations  here  and  issued  a  warning  of  an  "intensified  effort  by  international 
communism  to  undermine  the  unity  of  the  hemisphere." 

Cuba  was  not  mentioned  in  the  communique,  but  the  degree  of  Communist 
infiltration  in  Cuba  public  life  was  discussed  by  the  ambassadors  with  concern. 
Rey  exchanged  views  on  how  best  to  deal  with  the  problem. 

This  point  was  discussed  even  in  greater  detail  when  United  States  Ambassadors 
in  Central  America  and  the  Caribbean  held  a  similar  conference  in  El  Salvador 
last  month. 


104  COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH    THE    CARIBBEAN 

Offering  his  views  and  those  of  Mao  Tse-tung,  Chinese  Communist  leader, 
whom  he  visited  in  Peiping  in  February,  Senor  Corvalan  went  far  to  confirm 
United  States  suspicions  that  the  Communists  were  undertaking  to  turn  the 
Cuban  revolution  to  their  advantage. 

Five  thousand  party  members  applauded  when  Glen  Corvalan  cited  the  growth 
of  Communist  Parties  in  Colombia  and  Venezuela,  "and  especially  the  Cuban 
revolution,"  as  important  steps  toward  "the  inevitable  liberation  of  our  countries 
from  the  Yankee  yoke." 

In  his  2-hour  report,  he  charged  that  the  United  States  had  begun  an  attack 
on  democracy  in  Latin  America,  with  the  "Cuban  revolution  as  the  first  target" 
of  an  anti-Communist  campaign. 

He  said  the  meetings  of  U.S.  Ambassadors  in  El  Salvador  and  Santiago  were  part 
of  this  campaign.  He  held  that  the  campaign  would  continue  "with  the  same 
objectives"  when  the  Foreign  Ministers  of  the  American  Republics  convened  in 
Quito,  Ecuador,  next  February. 

The  last  reference  interested  diplomats  here  in  the  light  of  U.S.  intelligence 
reports  that  the  Communists  were  planning  major  disturbances  during  the  Quito 
Conference. 

Senor  Corvalan  said  Mr.  Mao  had  told  him  the  Cuban  revolution  had  dis- 
sipated the  myth  that  "the  Yankees  are  invincible." 

According  to  him,  Mr.  Mao  also  said: 

"Many  people  say  the  Yankees  are  powerful  because  they  have  the  atomic 
bomb.  But  the  people  of  Cuba  did  not  need  the  bomb  to  overthrow  their  yoke. 
There  cannot  be  a  triumph  of  revolution  when  there  is  an  idea  of  fear." 

Senor  Corvalan  is  a  short  man  with  the  air  of  a  provincial  teacher.  He  de- 
veloped another  theme  for  Latin  Communists,  and  again  Dr.  Castro  was  invoked. 

He  charged  that  cooperative  inter-American  programs  for  economic  advance- 
ment were  a  plot  to  strengthen  the  U.S.  domination  of  the  hemisphere. 

Last  week's  conference  of  the  Committee  of  Twenty-one  in  Buenos  Aires  failed 
to  produce  results,  he  said. 

Plans  for  a  Latin  common  market,  to  be  discussed  this  week  in  Panama  by  the 
United  Nations  Economic  Commission  for  Ijatin  America,  "will  only  lead  to 
strengthening  U.S.  monopolies,"  he  declared. 

"As  Fidel  Castro  said,"  he  went  on,  "these  meetings  do  not  interest  the  people. 

Sefior  Corvalan  charged  that  the  Inter-American  Bank  created  last  month,  as 
the  result  of  a  year's  insistence  by  Latins,  would  "open  new  fields  to  L^.S. 
capitalists." 

Referring  to  the  Buenos  Aires  Conference,  which  marked  a  year  of  discussions 
with  the  United  States  on  economic  cooperation,  he  commented: 

"In  the  end,  the  Latin-American  delegates  went  home  with  empty  pockets. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  Second,  is  an  article  from  Political  Affairs  of 
March  1956,  by  Galo  Gonzales  Diaz,  General  Secretary  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  of  Chile. 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  article  referred  to  follows:) 

[Political  Affairs,  March  195S] 

Foster  and  Latin  America 

(By  Galo  Gonzales  Diaz,  General  Secretary,  C.P.  of  Chile) 

The  75th  anniversary  of  Comrade  William  Z.  Foster  fills  the  workers  of  Xorth 
America  and  of  the  entire  world  with  joy.  This  anniversary  is  especially  cele- 
brated by  the  Latin- American  peoples.  The  long  career  of  the  Chairman  of  the 
Communist  Party  of  the  United  States — the  fact  that  he  is  a  great  leader  of  the 
working  class  and  a  profound  Marxist  theoretician — make  of  him  an  example  for 
those  who  have  placed  their  lives  at  the  service  of  the  most  noble  and  urgent  task 
of(Jour  epoch:  to  win  the  battle  between  the  forces  of  war  and  those  of  peace.  In 
these  years  when  the  peoples  confront  imperialism  and  open  the  road  to  Socialism, 
Comrade  Foster  has  distinguished  himself  as  an  anti-imperialist  fighter. 
The  Draft  Program  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Chile  states: 
"The  North  American  monopolies  have  taken  possession  of  almost  all  our 
copper,  nitrate,  and  iron;  they  run  our  foreign  trade;  they  hold  in  their  hands  a 
part  of  our  water  power  and  of  the  distribution  of  electrical  energy ;  they  own  the 
telephone  service;  they  control  the  important  steel  industry  of  Huachipato,  and 
control  part  of  the  internal  trade  through  large  distributing  firms. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  105 

"The  Yankee  monopolies  are  plundering  Chile;  they  carry  off  our  raw  materia^ 
they  prevent  its  processing  in  our  country,  and  they  make  fabulous  profits  from 

*^''This  plunder  is  increased  tremendously  through  Yankee  monopoly  of  our 
foreign  trade.  *  *  *  An  idea  of  the  great  losses  jpAicted  on  Chile  by  this 
monopoly  can  be  had  from  the  fact  that  during  the  Second  World  War  we  lost 
five  hundred  million  dollars  because  the  North  American  government  quoted 

""ThS^^picture'^of'ihe^etpToitati^     suffered  by  Chile  at  the  hands  of  the  North 
\merican  monopolies  is  generally  the  same  throughout  Latin  America. 

4s  if  this  were  not  enough,  in  addition  to  economic  control  and  parallel  with  it, 
the  North  \merican  government  makes  us  the  object  of  pitiless  political  doniina- 
tion  With  the  backing  of  despicable  traitors  whom  they  always  find  at  a  cheap 
price  and  in  alliance  with  landholding  and  banking  ohgarchies,  the  imperialists 
impo'se  upon  us  military  pacts,  international  "agreements  undercutting  the 
sovereignty  of  our  countries,  and  repressive  laws  of  every  kind.  Furthermore 
with  a  systematic  plan  of  ideological  penetration,  they  smother  our  press  and 
radio  and  even  the  universities  with  their  reactionary  propaganda;  at  the  same 
time,  they  trample  upon  our  culture,  our  republican  traditio.s,  and  our  national 

sentiments.  ,        ,         ,.  j     r      i 

The  contemporary  history  of  our  continent  is,  therefore,  the  record  ot  a  long 
chain  of  aggressions" and  acts  of  robbery  by  North  American  imperialism;  but  it 
is  also  the  record  of  a  rich,  glorious  and  heroic  struggle  by  our  peoples  to  defend 
and  extend  our  sovereignty,  to  maintain  or  regain  our  democratic  forms  and  to 
rescue  our  resources  from' the  hands  of  the  hated  Wall  Street  monopolies  In 
this  long  struggle,  our  peoples  have  found  an  ally  in  the  working  class  and  the 
democratic  masses  of  the  United  States;  and  the  Communist  Party  of  the  Ijmted 
States  has  ably  pointed  out  that  we  have  one  common,  basic  opponent  and  that 
we  must  act  together  in  order  to  defeat  him  and  get  rid  of  his  exploitation. 

On  the  occcasion  of  Comrade  Foster's  75th  birthday,  we  can  confirm  that  these 
75  years  saw  a  persistent  attempt  by  the  Wall  Street  bosses  to  reduce  our  countries 
to  the  status  of  semicolon ies,  and  even  of  outright  colonies.  But  they  are  also 
75  years  of  struggle  bv  the  Latin  American  peoples  for  their  independence  and 
simultaneously— even  jointly,  at  times— struggles  by  the  North  American  peoples 
to  open  up  a  democratic  path.  During  these  75  years  we  have  seen  glorious 
figures  arise  in  the  struggles  for  emancipation  and  against  fascism  who  today 
are  the  heroes  of  the  common  people,  among  them  thousands  of  the  unsung 
and  unknown  who  have  fallen  in  the  streets,  factories,  and  jails  of  Santiago  or 
New  York,  of  Mexico  or  Chicago,  welding  forever  with  their  blood  the  brother- 
hood of  Latin  American  and  United  States  workers. 

In  accordance  with  the  fundamental  law  of  imperialist  economy  to  e.xploit  us 
to  the  maximum— and  as  the  wave  of  liberation  sweeping  through  Asia  and  Africa 
tears  from  imperialism  tens  and  hundreds  of  millions  of  people— the  monopolists 
trv  to  compensate  themselves  by  redoubling  their  economic  and  political  pene- 
tr'ation  in  Latin  America.  In  Chile,  we  are  being  subjected  to  a  new  offensive  of 
the  exploiters,  who  wish  to  unload  upon  our  people  the  full  weight  of  the  crisis. 
They  have  tried  to  silence  popular  protest  with  new  repressive  measures— many 
leaders  of  the  United  Workers  Federation  have  been  arrested  and  concentration 
camps  have  been  reopened  in  various  parts  of  the  country. 

These  events  highlight  the  exceptional  significance  of  the  judgment  ma,de  Dy 
Comrade  Foster  in  1951  in  his  Outline  Political  History  of  the  Americas,  and  since 

further  confirmed:  ,    ,    ^         i    •     *k    ?„«», 

"The  trade  unions  of  Latin  America  have  a  heroic  record  of  struggle  in  the  tace 
of  the  most  violent  opposition  from  the  state,  the  employers,  and  the  landowners. 
Their  honor  roll  is  replete  with  the  names  of  innumerable  workers  shot  down  and 
jailed  in  their  dauntless  fight  to  secure  the  necessities  of  life  for  themselves  and 
their  families  from  the  parasitic  elements  who  are  exploiting  them. 

At  the  same  time  that  imperialism  is  being  fought  in  Latin  America,  no  less 
intense  nor  less  sustained  is  the  struggle  which  the  comrades  of  the  Communist 
Party  of  the  United  States,  with  William  Z.  Foster  at  the  head,  are  waging  against 
the  common  antagonist— an  antagonist  which  is  directing  its  repressive  blows 
against  the  North  American  working  class  with  as  great  or  greater  force  than  upon 
our  peoples.  During  the  last  decade,  the  North  American  monopolies  have  tried 
frantically  to  annihilate  all  democratic  forms  in  that  country;  they  have  passed 
repressive  laws  of  all  kinds,  have  jailed  or  deported  the  most  loyal  sons  and  daugn- 
ters  of  the  working  class,  have  persecuted  all  progressive  groups,  have  persisted  m 
a  shameless  policy  of  race  discrimination,  have  let  loose  anti-Commumst  hysteria, 


106  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

have  filled  tons  of  paper  with  war  propaganda,  have  converted  an  important 
sector  of  industry  into  factories  of  armament  and  death.  -  They  have  not  stopped 
even  at  execution,  as  in  the  case  of  the  immortal  Ethel  and  Julius  Rosenberg. 
To  sum  up,  in  seeking  domination,  they  have  overlooked  nothing  in  their  war 
upon  democratic  forms  of  life  so  beloved  by  the  North  American  masses,  in  order 
to  exploit  them  and  to  use  them  more  easily  for  cannonfodder. 
And,  during  some  years,  they  achieved  successes  along  these  lines. 
Nevertheless,  facts  prove  the  precarious  nature  of  all  this  repressive  apparatus. 
The  struggles  for  peace  of  all  the  peoples  of  the  world — headed  by  the  U.S.S.R., 
the  Chinese  People's  Republic  and  the  People's  Democracies — began  to  inflict 
most  important  setbacks  upon  imperialism's  plans  for  war  and  fascism.  The 
North  American  people  themselves,  joining  the  fight,  have  contributed  in  good 
part  to  the  successes  obtained.  According  to  a  statement  made  recently  in 
Carnegie  Hall  in  New  York  City  of  Comrade  Eugene  Dennis,  that  which  five 
years  ago  was  proclaimed  by  Communists  alone,  is  now  the  belief  of  millions  of 
U.S.  citizens,  who  advocate  peaceful  coexistence  among  all  peoples,  an  end  to 
poverty  and  discrimination,  and  the  restoration  of  all  democratic  rights  guaranteed 
in  their  Constitution. 

McCarthyism,  already  isolated  within  the  United  States  and  repudiated 
throughout  the  world,  has  begun  to  rot. 

The  working  class  has  strengthened  itself  by  the  merger  of  the  AFL  and  CIO. 
Several  of  the  most  reactionary  candidates  were  defeated  in  the  last  elections. 
Internal  pressure  has  become  a  powerful  factor,  which  together  with  international 
factors,  compelled  the  holding  of  the  Geneva  Conference,  eased  international 
tension  and  lessened  the  intensity  of  repression. 

Comrade  Foster,  unflinching  at  his  fighting  post  at  the  head  of  his  Party,  with 
the  firmness  characteristic  of  the  working  class,  has  proved  during  these  years 
that  a  good  Communist  grows  in  moments  of  difficulty.  Moulded  in  the  most 
severe  struggle,  as  have  been  all  great  popular  leaders.  Comrade  Foster  already 
at  an  early  age  knew  what  exploitation  was,  having  to  leave  school  when  13 
years  old  and  go  to  work.  A  striker  at  14,  socialist  at  19,  union  organizer  at  20, 
he  proved  staunch  in  service  to  his  class.  The  Negroes,  the  unemployed,  organ- 
ized workers,  women  workers — all  who  fight  for  their  rights  have  always  found 
him  at  their  side. 

His  ideological  firmness  led  him  to  watch  over  the  Marxist-Leninist  line, 
combatting  the  Browder  deviation  which  threatened  the  very  life  of  his  Party. 
After  a  sharp  inner  fight,  Foster  in  1945  returned  to  the  leadership  of  his  Party, 
maintaining  a  consistent  proletarian  line. 

Comrade  Foster's  contribution  to  Marxist  theory  is  as  valuable  as  his  practical 
Communist  activity.  His  basic  work.  Outline  Political  History  of  the  Americas, 
is  a  monumental  contribution  to  the  study  of  the  history  of  our  continent. 

In  its  struggle,  the  Communist  Party  of  Chile  is  inspired  by  the  traditions  and 
experiences  of  the  working-class  movement  of  our  country  and  by  the  enlightening 
examples  of  the  glorious  and  invincible  Communist  Party  of  the  Soviet  Union,  of 
the  Chinese  Communist  Party,  and  of  the  others  which  have  succeeded  in  ridding 
themselves  of  imperialism.  Since  we  are  interested  in  assimilating  everything 
positive  in  the  history  of  all  peoples,  we  consider  the  Outline  Political  History  of 
the  Americas  important  not  only  for  its  correct  proletarian  internationalism,  but 
also  for  the  great  wealth  of  experiences  it  offers  from  the  North  American 
workers'  movement. 

Wisely  does  Comrade  Foster  observe  in  this  book: 

"The  Communist  Parties  of  the  Americas  live  and  function  in  a  capitalist 
environment;  they  are  therefore  subjected  to  powerful  ideological  as  well  as  politi- 
cal pressures  from  the  huge  capitalist  propaganda  apparatus  of  the  governments, 
schools,  church,  press,  and  controlled  labor  leaders.  It  follows  that  they  must 
wage  a  constant  struggle  against  these  foreign  influences  and  educate  their  mem- 
bers in  the  principles  of  Marxism-Leninism.  This  struggle  for  ideological  develop- 
ment has  been  continuous  since  the  organization  of  the  Communist  movement." 
The  Communists  of  Latin  America  confirm  the  wise  words  of  Comrade  Foster 
concerning  the  future  of  our  national  liberation  movement: 

"The  march  toward  Socialism  is  a  revolutionary  march  and,  because  of  the 
different  stages  of  industrial  development  and  political  history  in  Latin  America 
and  of  the  United  States,  the  road  will  not  be  precisely  the  same  in  these  two 
areas.  *  *  * 

"A  favorable  situation  for  a  real  advance  toward  Socialism  by  the  workers  and 
their  allies  could  develop  swiftly  in  the  Americas.  Latin  America  is  in  an  explosive 
state,  and  profound  revolutionary  mass  movements  may  be  expected  there  before 
long.  As  for  the  United  States,  the  last  great  stronghold  of  world  capitalism,  it, 
too,  is  by  no  means  invulnerable  to  mass  advances  toward  Socialism. 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  107 

"Fifty  years  ago  capitalism  was  triumphant  throughout  the  world  and  the 
Communists  were  but  a  small  minority  among  the  huge  ranks  of  the  masses; 
but  today  capitalism  is  visibly  rotting,  and  the  Communists  are  leading  800 
million  people  into  Socialism.  This  is  the  way  the  world  in  general  is  going, 
and  this  is  the  route,  too,  of  the  peoples  of  the  Western  Hemisphere.  The  great 
historical  process  that  has  gone  on  in  the  Americas  for  more  than  four  and  a 
half  centuries  since  Columbus  landed  in  the  West  Indies,  does  not  lead  to  the 
fascist  Yankee-dominated  world  of  Wall  Street,  but  to  the  new  free  world  of 
Socialism." 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  I  should  like  to  ask  the  witness,  from  your  knowl- 
edge of  Communist  affairs  and  operations,  can  you  state  whether  a 
piece  in  Political  Affairs  by  the  Secretary  of  the  Communist  Party  of 
Chile  would  necessarily  represent  the  current  Communist  line? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Oh,  yes;  that  is  a  directive. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  have  one  other  article  by  Tad 
Szulc.  This  appeared  in  the  New  York  Times  of  May  15,  1959,  and 
refers  to  an  alleged  Communist  plot  in  Ecuador. 

May  that  also  be  offered  for  the  record? 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  newspaper  article  referred  to  follows :) 

INew  York  Times,  Friday,  May  15, 1959,  p.  4] 
Reds  in  Ecuador  Accused  op  Plot 

PARTY  IS  reported   PLANNING  TO   SABOTAGE   HEMISPHERE   PARLEYS  IN  FEBRUARY 

(By  Tad  Szulc) 
(Special  to  the  New  York  Times) 

Quito,  Ecuador,  May  14. — The  Ecuadorian  Communist  Party  is  preparing 
a  campaign  to  discredit  and  if  possible  disrupt  the  conference  of  American  foreign 
ministers  to  be  held  here  next  February. 

It  is  part  of  Communis^,  strategy  aimed  at  isolating  the  United  States  from 
Latin  America. 

The  Communist  plans  which  were  first  drawn  up  in  outline  in  a  secret  resolution 
of  the  party's  central  committee  last  December,  are  now  developed  in  detail  and 
are  expected  to  include  acts  against  a  meeting  of  the  presidents  of  the  hemisphere 
nations  near  Guayaquil,  Ecuador,  immediately  after  the  foreign  ministers'  parley. 

PROPOSAL   GAINS  APPROVAL 

Ecuador  proposed  a  Western  Hemisphere  summit  conference  last  week  and  the 
idea  appears  as  to  have  gained  acceptance  among  the  governments. 

The  preparation  of  the  Communist  campaign  against  the  inter- American  con- 
ference in  Quito — evidently  one  of  the  top  current  Communist  objectives  in  the 
hemisphere — has  been  accompanied  by  increased  Communist  activities  in  Ecuador 
in  recent  months. 

Ecuadorian  authorities  report  a  clandestine  but  substantial  flow  of  Communist 
propaganda  into  the  country.  Only  this  week  a  shipment  of  8,500  Communist 
propaganda  books  for  the  indoctrination  of  children  arrived  here  from  Mexico, 
which  is  one  of  the  main  hemisphere  centers  for  distribution  of  this  type  of 
material. 

ARMS  CARGOES  ARRIVE 

According  to  a  Government  source,  several  shipments  of  arms  believed  to  be 
destined  for  Communist  groups  or  groups  with  Communist  connections  arrived 
in  Ecuador  in  February. 

Ecuadorian  intelligence  reports  also  indicated  four  Cuban  Communist  leaders 
either  arrived  or  were  about  to  arrive  in  Ecuador  to  assist  the  small  Ecuadorian 
Communist  party  in  coordinating  its  new  activities,  presumably  including  plans 
against  the  foreign  ministers'  conference. 

In  the  view  of  the  President  Camilo  Ponce  Enriquez,  all  these  activities  suggest 
that  Ecuador  has  become  "one  of  communism's  prime  targets  in  South  America." 

In  an  interview  yesterday,  President  Ponce  said  that  the  Government  was  on 
the  alert  and  that  he  believed  it  could  handle  any  situation,  including  whatever 
difficulties  the  Communists  might  cause  on  the  occasion  of  the  conference. 


108  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

Dr.  Ponce  said  one  of  the  reasons  for  Communist  interest  in  Ecuador  was  that 
the  nation  of  4  million  inhabitants  was  an  island  of  stability  in  a  restless  South 
American  Continent.  Indeed,  in  3  years  of  democratic  administration  by  Dr. 
Ponce,  a  moderate  Conservative,  Ecuador  has  enjoyed  remarkable  political 
stability,  made  some  economic  gains  and  became  virtually  the  only  South  American 
republic  to  have  escaped  inflation  and  currency  depreciation. 

ELECTIONS    SLATED    IN    JUNE 

With  presidential  elections  scheduled  for  June  1960,  the  political  atmosphere  is 
certain  to  become  more  turbulent. 

As  the  foreign  ministers'  conference  will  be  held  only  a  few  months  before  the 
elections,  the  Communists  may  seek  to  capitalize  on  political  tension  to  sabotage 
the  parley. 

The  party's  secret  directive,  prepared  at  the  central  committee's  meeting  in 
Guayaquil  December  6  through  8,  was  intercepted  by  the  Ecuadorian  Govern- 
ment but  not  made  public  thus  far.  It  ordered  the  executive  committee  of  the 
party's  central  committee  to  "prepare  a  detailed  work  plan  for  amplification  of 
this  resolution." 

The  directive  orders  that  there  be  "coordination  of  action  of  the  Communist 
Parties  of  Latin  American  countries  and  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  United 
States  for  the  campaign  against  the  conference. 

The  ground  work  for  this  coordination  was  done  in  February  in  Moscow, 
when  Latin  American  Communist  leaders  met  there  for  the  21st  congress  of  the 
Soviet  party.  There  has  been  subsequent  consultation  through  frequent  but 
brief  visits  here  by  Latin  American  and  European  Communist  agents,  who, 
according  to  President  Ponce,  have  been  coming  to  Ecuador  in  increasing  numbers. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  I  should  like  to  show  this  to  the  witness. 

I  believe  you  have  read  it.  Have  you  read  that  article  by  Mr.  Tad 
Szulc? 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Yes;  I  am  generally  familiar  with  it. 

Mr.  SoURWiNE.  Is  that  evidence,  Mr.  Kornfeder,  of  the  integration 
of  units  of  the  Communist  Party  operations  in  Latin  America? 

Mr,  Kornfeder.  Yes.  This  is  the  result  of  a  conference  held  by 
Communist  leaders  in  South  America,  and  it  contains  some  of  their 
decisions. 

As  I  said  before,  they  hold  these  conferences  periodically  for  a 
tactical  checkup  of  their  operations.    This  was  one  of  them. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  hold  here  an  article,  a  photostat 
of  an  article,  from  Political  .Affairs  of  June  1959,  and  the  title  of  the 
article  is  ".A  Program  for  Cuba."  The  writer  of  the  article  is  not 
identified  except  by  the  initials  "N.C.,  Popular  Socialist  Party." 

Does  what  you  said  earlier  with  regard  to  an  article  in  Political 
Affairs  apply  also  with  regard  to  this  article,  Mr.  Kornfeder;  by  reason 
of  its  publication  in  Political  Affairs  it  would  necessarily  represent  a 
Communist  du'ective  of  the  current  Communist  line? 

Mr.  Kornfeder.  Yes. 

Mr.  SouRWiNE.  On  that  basis,  Mr.  Chairman,  it  may  be  offered 
for  the  record. 

Senator  Keating.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  article  referred  to  foUows:) 

[Political  Affairs,  June  1959] 

A  Program  for  Cuba 

(By  N.  C,  Popular  Socialist  |Party) 

Monopoly  capitalism  in  the  United  States,  having  enchained  the 
Cuban  people  for  sixty  years,  and  having  maintained  in  power  there 
puppet  dictators  like  Machado  and  Batista  of  unspeakable  brutality 
and  colossal  corruption,  fears  that  the  success  of  the  recent  revolution 
will  really  free  Cuba.    As  part  of  the  monopolists'  campaign  to  con- 


COMMUlSriST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  109 

tinue  Cuba's  enslavement,  there  has  developed  in  all  the  propaganda 
media  in  the  United  States  horror  stories  about  the  alleged  "infiltra- 
tion" of  Communists  into  Cuban  life  and  the  terrible  plans  of  these 
awful  Communists.  In  the  pages  that  follow,  readers  will  find — 
for  the  first  time  in  English — -the  full  suggested  program  for  Cuba 
recently  put  forth  by  tlie  valiant  Marxists- Leninists  of  that  Re- 
public; they  will  see  from  this  why  the  Popular  Socialist  Party  of 
Cuba  is  honored  with  the  special  hatred  of  Wall  Street. — The  Editor. 

NATIONAL    IXDEPENDENCE    AND    FOREIGN    POLICY 

1.  Absolute  recovery  of  the  national  sovereignty  and  inviolable  defense  of  the 
independence,  integrity,  and  honor  of  our  country.  Eliminations  of  all  inten- 
tions to  submit  to  orders,  pressure,  and  influence  of  foreign  imperialists.  To 
confirm  the  aspirations  and  determination  of  Cuba  to  attain  its  economic  inde- 
pendence by  virtue  of  the  administration  of  its  own  resources  and  the  promotion 
of  its  own  economy  on  a  developed  and  progressive  level.  Liquidation  of  the 
control,  intervention  and  interference  in  our  internal  affairs  by  the  embassy, 
consulates,  and  other  missions  that  the  U.S.  keeps  in  Cuba. 

2.  Reintegration  to  Cuban  sovereignty  of  the  territory  occupied  by  the  U.S. 
Naval  Base  in  Guantanamo,  as  well  as  cancelling  the  leasing  or  concession  to 
any  outside  power  of  national  territory  for  the  construction  of  land,  sea,  or  air 
bases. 

3.  Denunciation  and  cancellation  of  all  treaties,  agreements,  and  accords  in 
as  much  as  they  deny,  undermine,  or  restrict  the  independence  and  sovereignty 
of  the  nation  or  are  contrary  to  its  best  interests. 

4.  Annulment  of  the  colonialist  concessions  (Canal  Via-Cuba,  King  Ranch, 
Boa  Bay  Company,  oil  concerns,  etc.)  which  undermine  the  national  sovereignty 
and  are  counter  to  the  free  economic  development  of  Cuba. 

5.  Immediate  nationalization  of  Public  Service  enterprises  (Compania  Cubana 
de  Electricidad,  Cuban  Telephone  Company,  railways,  aviation,  port  facilities, 
etc.)  and  of  foreign  banks  with  the  aims,  among  others,  of  cutting  their  exploitation 
through  shares  and  also  in  order  to  reduce  their  service  charges  for  the  sake  of 
the  national  economic  development. 

Recovery,  for  the  national  patrimony,  of  all  lands,  reservations  and  mine 
projects  owned  by  foreign  businesses  or  individuals. 

6.  Protection  of  enterprises  not  nationalized,  and  even  though  not  Cuban 
owned,  which  respect  the  sovereignty  and  the  interests  of  our  nation,  obey  the 
laws  and  cooperate  with  the  national  democratic  power  in  promotion  of  the  na- 
tional economy.  On  the  contrary,  foreign  businesses  'and  enterprises,  even 
though  not  of  a  public  service  character,  that  attack  or  conspire  against  our 
sovereignty,  protect  or  finance  counter-revolutionaries,  violate  our  social 
rules  and  .sabotage  the  national  economy,  shall  be  interfered  with  or  nationalized. 

7.  A  foreign  policy  based  on  the  faithful  observance  of  the  following  principles: 
defense  of  our  national  independence;  defense  of  world  peace  and  cooperating 
towards  this  fulfillment  bv  means  of  solving  international  conflicts  through  nego- 
tiations, the  prohibition  of  nuclear  weapons,  halting  of  the  armaments  race  and 
gradual  disarmament;  peaceful  coexistence;  nonaggression  and  respect  for  the 
territorial  integrity  and  sovereignty  of  all  nations;  noninterference  in  the  affairs 
of  other  states;  support  of  all  peoples  struggling  for  national  liberation  and  for 
the  rights  of  every  nation  to  build  freely  its  self-determination;  and  to  establish 
trade  and  friendly  relations  with  all  nations  on  the  basis  of  mutual  benefit  and 
equality.  With  these  principles  and  considerations  as  a  starting  point,  Cuba 
must  develop  a  double  course  of  action: 

A.  Renegotiating  its  diplomatic  and  trade  relations  with  the  U.S.A.  so  as  to 
alter  the  status  quo  not  favorable  to  the  national  interest;  and  B,  Maintaining  or 
establishing  diplomatic  and  commercial  and  cultural  relations  with  all  countries 
capable  of  treating  Cuba  as  equal  lo  equal,  including  the  countries  of  the  Socialist 
camp,  such  as  the  U.S.S.R.,  the  People's  Republic  of  China,  and  all  popular  democ- 
racies in  general.  With  particular  interest  Cuba  should  carry  out  a  policy  of 
solidarity,  friendship  and  cooperation  with  the  sister  republics  of  Latin  America. 

8.  Adoption  of  all  means  to  prescribe  and  to  punish  war  propaganda. 

AGRARIAN    REFORM 

9.  Solution  of  the  agrarian  reform  problem,  based  on  the  expropriation  of  all 
lands  belonging  to  big  landowners;  elimination  of  "Latifundism"  and  farm  rentals 
and  other  remnants  of  Feudalism;  also,  the  partition  and  delivery  of  expropriated 

6649Z   O  -  61   -  6 


110  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

and  government  lands  free  of  charge  to  the  peasants  and  farm  workers  who  own 
little  or  no  land  and  who  desire  to  cultivate  the  same.  -  Each  peasant  or  farm 
worker  benefiting  from  the  partition  of  land  shall  receive  a  property  deed  covering 
the  piece  of  land  received.  On  the  same  basis,  all  lands  heretofore  occupied  by 
other  impoverished  peasants  shall  receive  the  corresponding  legal  title.  In  like 
fashion,  all  members,  temporarily  in  the  armed  forces  and  who  are  of  peasant 
stock,  shall  have  the  right  to  participate  in  the  land  partition.  As  a  transitory 
measure  and  as  lon;^  as  present  sugar  producing  conditions  prevail,  those  lands 
belonging  to  latifundists  and  other  sugar  companies  actually  planted  with  sugar- 
cane so  indispensable  for  milling,  such  lands  shall  not  be  expropriated  or  shared 
out,  except  those  lands  which  had  been  handed,  rented  or  given  to  peasants  or 
sharecroppers — in  which  case  they  will  come  under  the  conditions  of  landsharing. 
All  persons  of  foreign  extraction  who  have  resided  and  raised  families  within  our 
national  territory,  will  have  the  right  to  possession  of  land  under  the  same  condi- 
tions covering  Cuban  citizens. 

10.  The  maximum  amount  of  land  possessed  by  a  peasant  will  be  fixed  by  law 
considering  the  location  and  quality  of  such  land,  but  in  no  case  will  it  be  more 
than  "thirty"  (30)  caballerias  (33^  acres).  On  this  basis  middle  income  and  rich 
owners  will  have  a  legal  guarantee — as  will  the  poor  landowners — of  the  property 
they  shall  possess. 

1 1 .  Abolition  of  sharecropping  (aparceria)  and  of  all  forms  of  semifeudal  explora- 
tion of  the  peasantry. 

12.  Revision  of  all  debts,  particularly  the  onerous  and  unjust  debts  the  peas- 
antry have  contracted  with  the  latifundists,  sugar  mills,  speculators,  stock 
merchants,  and  other  imperialist  enterprises.  Cancellation  of  the  debts  the 
peasants  owe  the  state  because  of  taxation. 

13.  Rights  to  permanency  as  well  as  reduction  of  rentals  to  peasants  who  lease 
land  while  the  renting  system  is  in  effect. 

14.  To  afford  all  peasants,  farm  workers  and  all  other  peasants  that  may  need 
them,  with  such  facilities  as  farm  animals,  equipment  for  such  animals,  etc.,  as 
well  as  low-paying,  long-term  loans  towards  the  purchase  of  machinery,  seed, 
fertilizer,  insecticides,  dwelling  construction,  wells,  etc.  To  make  sure  that  cheap 
transportation  is  provided  for  these  farm  products.  The  National  Government 
will  organize  ample  technical  help  to  the  peasants,  and  will  promote  among 
them  the  necessary  spirit  to  collectively  exploit  the  land  through  the  organization 
of  voluntary  cooperatives. 

15.  Construction  of  irrigation  systems,  country  lanes,  warehouses,  cold  storage 
stations,  driers,  coffee  and  rice  peelers,  etc.,  with  the  purpose  of  satisfying  the  needs 
of  the  peasants  and  to  develop  Cuban  agriculture.  Protection  of  forests  plus 
ample  reforestation.  Steps  against  erosion  and  in  favor  of  soil  conservation,  as 
well  as  filling  of  swampy  regions.  The  creation  of  experimental  stations  so  as  to 
help  the  peasants  to  improve  the  quality  of  their  seeds,  their  methods  of  cultiva- 
tion, their  assorted  livestock,  etc. 

16.  Organization  of  an  official  corporation  whose  aim  shall  be  to  receive  and 
store  the  peasants'  products  and  to  assure  them  stable  and  remunerative  prices 
so  as  to  eliminate  speculative  warehouse  grabbers  and  all  sorts  of  exploiting  middle- 
men and  thus  facilitating  and  assuring  the  peasants  of  prompt  and  satisfactory 
sale  of  their  crops.  This  will,  in  the  meantime,  prevent  middlemen  from  specu- 
lating so  as  to  protect  the  large  consuming  masses. 

INDEPENDENT  PROTECTION  AND  DEVELOPMENT  OF  THE  NATIONAL  ECONOMY 

17.  Liberty  of  initiative  for  industry,  agriculture  and  domestic  trade  based  on 
the  defense  of  the  national  economy  and  the  sound  interests  of  the  people. 

18.  Control  of  banking  credits  to  mobilize  inactive  capital  and  to  concentrate 
all  national  resources  so  as  to  change  the  semicolonial  and  semifeudal  structure  of 
the  Cuban  economy  thus  protecting,  developing  and  diversifying  the  industry 
and  agriculture  of  the  nation.  Benefits  and  protection  shall  be  guaranteed  to 
private  capital  investments  within  the  law. 

19.  Defense  and  promotion  of  industry  and  agriculture  with  a  view  towards 
the  needs  of  the  country  and  its  complete  independence,  and  towards  the  elimina- 
tion of  the  single  crop  and  of  economic  backwardness.  Development  of  heavy 
industry  in  conformity  with  the  possibilities  and  resources  of  the  naticn. 

All  categories  of  tariff  protection  (import  quotas,  reduction  or  extension  of  im- 
posts, subsidies,  etc.)  as  regards  the  national  production  in  the  face  of  outside 
competition.  Prohibition  or  restriction  on  the  importation  of  such  goods  and 
products  which  mean  an  unnecessary  drainage  on  the  shares  of  our  economy, 
which  obstruct  the  development  of  our  industry  or  agriculture  or  may  jeopardize 
the  creation  of  new  national  sources  of  production  and  employment. 


COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  IH 

20.  Development,  under  the  direction  of  the  government,  of  sugar  by-products 
such  as  alcohol,  cattle  feed,  several  chemical  products,  paper  matter,  etc.  In 
general,  to  get  the  most  out  of  the  sugar  industry  so  as  to  extend  to  as  large  a 
degree  as  possible  the  work  in  the  mills  and  farms  and  to  reduce  to  the  minimum 
any  waste  of  time. 

21.  National  development  of  oil  wells,  without  intervention  of  imperialist 
monopolies,  with  the  aim  of  guaranteeing  to  the  nation,  under  safe  conditions  and 
low  prices,  the  necessary  fuel  for  its  industrial  and  agricultural  growth. 

22.  Revision  and  ruling  of  commercial  relations  with  all  countries  on  the  basis 
of  selling  what  we  produce  and  purchasing  what  we  need  for  our  development  and 
our  consumption,  from  any  part  of  the  globe  without  undermining  the  economy 
and  independence  of  our  country.  Annulment  of  sugar  policies  inspired  by  the 
onerous  Chadbourne  Plan  of  the  past  and  by  the  London  accord  of  the  present, 
which  forces  unilateral  restriction  of  the  Cuban  production,  adopting  instead  a 
new  line  of  action  to  disavow  the  said  unilateral  restriction,  a  line  that  is  based 
primarily  on  the  national  interest  and  not  on  that  of  the  large  North  American 
sugar  monopolies. 

23.  Measures  with  the  aim  to  protect  small-time  industrialists  vis-a-vis  the 
monopolists  and  grab-bags  as  well  as  the  promotion  of  cooperatives  of  artisans 
and  shopkeepers.  Among  these  measures  we  point  out  the  following:  Govern- 
ment aid,  credit  concessions,  facilities  towards  the  acquisition  of  machinery,  tools, 
raw  materials,  plus  organizing  a  corporation  with  the  purpose  of  storage,  distri- 
bution and  sales  of  the  products. 

24.  Protection  and  development  of  the  fishing  industry  with  particular  aid  to 
small  and  petit-bourgeois  fishermen  by  means  of  credits,  delivery  of  equipment 
and  boating,  establishment  of  cold  storage,  fish-drying  places,  fisherman  coop- 
eratives, etc. 

25.  Promotion  of  the  merchant  marine,  both  coastal  and  overseas,  employing 
for  this  purpose  whatever  resources  might  be  necessary. 

26.  A  tax  reform  to  eliminate  indirect  imposts  which  burden  our  people,  and 
to  rely  on  progressive  and  direct  taxing  on  revenue  to  facilitate  and  propel  the 
national  economy  forward.  Price  control  and  measures  to  be  taken  against 
inflation  and  in  favor  of  the  national  currency. 

27.  A  planned  national  economy,  which,  with  this  program  as  a  basis  and 
without  losing  sight  of  the  limitations  within  the  existing  economic  system,  will 
fix  the  general  steps  to  be  followed  in  the  maximum  development  of  industry  and 
agriculture  and  the  full  economy  of  the  nation. 

28.  The  country,  based  upon  the  inescapable  letter  of  the  law  and  respect  for 
our  national  interests,  will  be  permitted  to  utilize  the  help  of  foreign  capital  assets 
or  offers  in  good  faith  without  strings  attached  made  by  countries  and  other  inter- 
national organizations  in  order  to  develop  industrialization  and  the  independent 
growth  of  tlae  national  economy. 

ON    IMPROVEMENT    OF    THE    WORKING-CLASS    CONDITIONS    AND    OF    THE    PEOPLE    IN 

GENERAL 

29.  Fulfillment  of  the  social  benefits  earned  by  the  workers  and  crystallized  in 
the  1940  Constitution.  Development  and  extension  of  social  security  legislation 
favorable  to  the  working  class  and  to  include  farmers  and  civil  employees  within 
its  benefits. 

30.  Fixing  a  livable  minimum  salary,  that  is,  increasing  the  wages  to  a  level 
that  will  guarantee  minimum  living  conditions  to  all  workers  within  the  national 
territory.  Increase  of  salaries  and  pensions.  To  effectively  apply  the  principle  of 
"equal  wages  for  equal  labor"  regardless  of  sex,  age,  race,  or  nationality. 

31.  Effective  application  of  the  eight-hour  day  as  concerns  all  workers  and  of 
the  44-hour  week  with  48-hour  payments,  plus  the  progressive  establishment  of 
the  40-hour  week.  A  six-hour  day  for  those  who  work  in  mines,  places  or  trades 
that  are  unhealthy  as  well  as  for  those  who  are  under  18  years  of  age. 

32.  To  forbid  outright  the  discharge  of  workers  or  employees  because  of  social 
or  political  reasons  or  because  of  unilateral  decisions  of  management. 

33.  Effective  guarantees  of  the  right  of  workers  to  collective  bargaining  with 
management,  and  obligation  of  the  state  to  acknowledge  and  to  supervise  the 
punctilious  fulfillment  of  same. 

34.  Protection  of  all  workers  against  rushing  tactics  employed  by  the  exploiters 
within  the  productive  process. 

35.  Enforcement  and  extension  of  assistance  and  social  security  benefits  for 
which  management  and  state  are  responsible,  so  that  pensions  and  other  benefits 
concerning  sickness,  old  age,  accident,  disability,  or  death  be  improved  sub- 
stantially and  may  cover  all  workers  and  employees,  both  public  and  private 


112  COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH    THE    CARIBBEAN 

as  well  as  their  relatives,  without  exception.    Extension  of  maternity  benefits  i  o  all 
workers,  both  industrial  and  farming  and  to  all  public  and  private  employees. 

36.  Monthly  subsidies  to  the  luiemployed  in  sufficient  amounts  to  take  care  of 
their  urgent  needs  of  shelter,  food  and  clothing. 

37.  Full  recognition  of  syndical  democracy  plus  guarantees  to  the  right  of  the 
workers  to  organize  and  to  elect  freely  their  officers  without  any  interfcjrence  on 
the  part  of  the  government  or  any  other  public  or  private  organization,  the  right 
to  hold  meetings,  organize  the  May  First  parade  and  to  strike  as  many  timt's  as  is 
deemed  necessary,  because  of  demands,  solidarity  matters  and  boycotts. 

3  8.  Participati"  I  of  democratically  elected  labor  leaders  in  the  regulating  or- 
gan! sms  of  the  sugar,  tobacco,  coffee,  livestock  and  other  branches  of  industry. 
These  representatives  would  be  under  obligation  of  regularly  giving  an  account  of 
their  functions  to  their  rank  and  file. 

39.  A  law  to  organize  and  guarantee  on-the-job  training  within  the  various 
branches  of  production  and  to  assure  jobs  to  our  working  youth. 

40.  Free  medical  assistance  to  all  workers  and  employees  in  factories,  shops, 
mills,  plantations,  offices  and  other  working  places,  at  the  expense  of  management 
and  the  state  (Government). 

41.  Reduction  in  prices  of  popular  items  and  services  such  as  food,  clothing, 
things  for  hire,  medicinal  goods,  transportation,  etc.,  in  order  to  improve  the 
standard  of  living  of  the  working  cla.ss  and  the  general  public. 

42.  Construction  of  healthy,  low-income  housing  for  workers,  employees  and 
for  the  people  in  general. 

43.  Creation  of  a  bank  for  loans  in  order  to  facilitate  low  interest  loans  to 
workers,  employees,  etc.,  who  may  need  them,  with  the  aim  of  eliminating  the 
limitless  exploitation  and  outrages  exercised  by  "speculators"  and  money  leaders. 

ON    THE    RIGHTS    OF    OUR    CITIZENS    AND    OF    THE    POLITICAL    SYSTEM 

44.  Complete  resurrection,  effective  enforcement  and  consistent  application  of 
the  1940  Constitution,  which  resulted  ftom  the  agreement  among  all  the  social 
forces  and  trends  of  the  country.  Only  the  peoples  and  their  legitimate  repre- 
sentatives have  the  right  to  amend  it — within  the  norms  established  by  its  own 
text — when  the  popular  and  national  interests  dictate  it,  so  as  to  improv»'  same 
and  to  make  it  more  efficient  as  an  instrument  of  the  national  sovereignty,  of  the 
economic  development  and  of  the  fullest  guarantee  of  the  rights  of  the  people  and 
of  the  working  class. 

45.  Abolition  of  all  laws,  decrees,  dispositions  and  measures  that  deny,  adul- 
terate or  restrict  the  democratic  rights  and  liberties  stated  within  the  C-onsti- 
tution,  among  which  stand  out  the  confiscations  and  raids  of  democratic  and 
workers  printing  shops,  the  so-called  dispositions  against  Communism,  the 
outlawing  of  the  P.S.P.  and  other  political  movements,  brutal  police  persecutions 
and  tortures,  the  existence  of  emergency  tribunals,  the  so-called  Certificate  of 
Passport  enforcement,  the  concentration  of  power  in  the  hands  of  the  Govern- 
ment Ministry  to  deny  and  grant  permits  for  meetings,  public  activities,  etc. 

As  a  result,  full  enforcement  of  the  democratic  rights  and  public  liberties, 
will  he  established  for  everyone.  There  will  be  special  guarantees  to  provide 
the  workers  and  the  general  public  with  material  means  to  exercise  freedom  of 
speech,  press,  radio  broadcasting,  assembly,  association,  striking,  public  meetings, 
etc.  Binding  respect  for  freedom  of  education,  for  choosing  a  profession,  for 
the  inviolability  of  the  home  and  the  right  to  correspond  through  the  mail.  Guar- 
antees for  the  free  political  organization  of  all  citizens. 

46.  AboHtiqn  of  SIM,  BRAC,  BIP,  SIN,  the  SIR  and  other  undemocratic 
organs  of  torture  and  repression.  Cleaning  out  of  all  armed  elements  who  heat, 
torture,  kill,  and  agents  of  imperialism  and  enemies  of  the  workers,  peasants 
and  of  the  general  pubfic.     Abolition  of  the  Military  Act. 

47.  The  armed  forces  shall  be  an  exclusibe  instrument  for  the  defen.-^e  of  the 
country,  the  liberty  and  integrity  of  the  motherland,  a  citizens'  guarantee,  of 
the  public  will  and  of  the  observance  of  the  Constitution  and  the  Dem'jcratic 
Laws. 

48.  Effective  establishment  of  the  semparliamentary  system  as  stated  in 
the  Constitution,  with  a  President  who  fully  represents  the  national  solidarity, 
a  Prime  Minister  who  will  direct  political  affairs  and  a  Council  of  Mimsters 
approved  by  Congress  and  fully  responsible  to  this  body. 

49.  Constituting  a  National  Liberation  Democratic  Government,  integrated 
by  the  working  class,  the  peasants,  the  petty-bourgeoisie,  and  the  national 
bourgeoisie,  the  one  and  only  government  that  would  be  capable  to  apply  con- 
sistently and  to  the  very  end  the  program  of  the  Salvation,  the  Progress  and 
the  Liberty  of  Cuba,  and  of  the  Public  Welfare. 


CO]VIMUNIST    THREAT   THROUGH    THE    CARIBBEAN  113 

The  close-knit  alliance  of  the  workers  and  the  peasants  shall  be  the  founda- 
tion of  such  a  government. 

The  leadership  of  the  working  class  is  essential  for  its  success. 

50.  Election  of  Senators  through  proportional  representation  or  election  by- 
virtue  of  receiving  the  largest  number  of  direct  votes  among  all  the  candidates  of 
the  different  parties. 

Democratization  and  perfecting  of  the  election  system  so  that  we  can  eflfectively 
bring  about  the  cooperation  of  the  parties  in  the  fulfillment  of  the  common  program 
promised  or  agreed  to. 

Extension  of  the  voting  right  to  young  peoples  from  the  age  of  18  (eighteen) 
and  to  members  of  the  armed  forces. 

51.  Rigidly  observed  administrative  morality  maintained  from  top  to  bottom, 
from  ihe  President  of  the  Republic  to  the  most  modest  employee  and  functionary. 

Reduction  in  the  cost  of  the  maintenance  of  the  nation  by  virtue  of  the  sensible 
lowering  of  the  incomes  of  the  high  functionaries  and  Congressmen. 

Elimination  of  imposts  (exactions)  which  victimize  small  merchants,  traders, 
shopkeepers,  milkmen,  small-time  peasant  producers,  etc.,  the  culprits  being 
inspectors,  officers,  police  agents,  functionaries  and  other  agents  of  the  public 
service. 

52.  Assurance  of  the  lay  Cuban  tradition,  which  established  separation  of 
Clergy  and  State  since  the  inception  of  the  Republic.  The  fullest  religious  freedom 
shall  be  guaranteed,  and  the  government  shall  defend  the  citizens'  right  to  embrace 
the  religion  of  his  or  her  preference  or  the  right  not  to  follow  any  religion. 

MEASURES    TO    INSURE    RACIAL    EQUALITY 

53.  An  Educational  and  Sanctions  Law  against  racial  discrimination  and  prac- 
tical application  to  eradicate  this  evil,  both  within  the  economic  and  social  (em- 
ployment, standard  of  living,  wages,  housing,  culture  and  developing  areas),  as 
well  as  in  the  political:  (the  right  to  employment  within  the  public  service  ad- 
ministration, within  the  armed  forces,  within  the  diplomatic  corps,  etc.). 

54.  Guarantee  of  full  equality  to  women  and  of  their  participation  among  all 
political,  social  and  economic  fields  on  the  same  level  as  men.  Protection  of  the 
home,,  of  motherhood  and  of  infants.  Development  of  a  system  of  child  care 
and  nurseries  so  as  to  insure  attention  for  children  whose  mothers  may  .work  in 
factories,  offices,  etc. 

NATIONAL    AND    POPULAR    EDUCATION 

55.  A  General  Reform  Law  for  learning  ba.sed  on  the  tradition  of  liberty, 
democracy,  civics  and  progressiveness  of  our  people.  Assurance  of  freee,  com- 
pulsory primary  education  with  the  necessar\-  increase  of  teachers  and  school 
buildings  throughout  the  country-.  Development  of  technological  and  special- 
ized learning  with  a  popular  character  and  aimed  at  meeting  the  needs  of  the 
industrial  and  agricultural  progress  of  the  country.  The  state  shall  assure  school 
supplies  in  abundance  to  primary  schools  as  well  as  books  and  tools  for  study  work 
at  reduced  prices  to  students  of  secondary,  technical,  and  university  levels.  En- 
rollment costs  shall  be  substantialh-  reduced,  an  ample  fund  for  free  enrollments 
shall  be  organized  and  housing  and  dining  facilities  shall  also  be  created  for  needy 
student.^  or  those  of  modest  resources.  The  state  shall  provide  employment  to 
those  young  graduates  from  secondary,  technical  and  higher  educational  institu- 
tions. Protection  and  promotion  of  the  national  culture,  defense  and  extension 
of  its  patriotic  and  progressive  traditions  while  struggling  against  imperialist 
influence  and  penetration.  Encouragement  to  the  development  of  Arts  and 
Sciences,  by  virtue  of  protecting  scientists,  intellectuals,  artists;  also  aid  to  scien- 
tific research,  libraries,  the  theater,  music,  plastics,  the  cinema,  television,  radio 
and  other  media  of  scientific  and  artistic  expression  with  the  purpose  of  elevating 
their  quality,  to  invigorate  their  national  outlook,  and  in  addition,  to  place  them 
at  the  service  of  the  people  and  on  behalf  of  the  advancement  of  the  motherland. 

OTHER    MEASURES    TO    BENEFIT    THE    POPULATION 

56.  Protection  and  encouragement  of  sports  and  the  physical  development  of 
the  people.  Construction  of  stadiums,  sports  centers,  gymnasia,  etc.,  at  the  serv- 
ice of  our  yjung  folks  with  the  aim  of  providing  sound  sports  rid  of  commercialism 
and  discrimmation,  so  as  to  contribute  to  their  physical  growth  and  to  keep  them 
away  from  vice  and  corruption. 

57.  To  carry  out  the  necessary  services  towards  the  construction  of  sewerage, 
aqueducts,  etc.,  for  the  many  towns  that  are  in  need  of  them.  Development  of  an 
ample  network  of  hospitals,  health  resorts,  dispensaries  and  shelter  homes,  with 


114  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

adequate  medical  supplies,  in  order  to  serve  the  whole  population  of  the  country. 
Creation  of  mobile  sanitary  units  for  fight  against  parasitic  and  other  diseases  in 
the  rural  zones.  The  extension  of  state  maternity  benefits  to  assist  and  aid  all 
women  who  are  not  covered  by  the  labor  maternity  social  security,  and  toward 
this  objective  the  number  of  existing  maternal  hospitals  shall  be  increased. 

Mr.  SouRwiNE.  I  have  no  further  questions  to  ask  this  witness. 

Senator  Keating.  Thank  you  very  much,  Mr.  Kornfeder,  and 
allow  me  to  express  the  gratitude  of  the  committee  to  you,  and  other 
former  Communists,  who  are  prepared  to  admit  that  they  were  fooled, 
so  candidly.  You  have  been  very  helpful  to  us  in  our  work  here  on  the 
subcommittee,  and  we  are  very  appreciative  and  only  wish  that  there 
were  more  who  were  prepared  to  do  the  same  thing  and  be  cooperative 
with  us  in  the  work  that  we  are  trying  to  do. 

Mr.  KoRNFEDER.  Thank  you,  Senator. 

(Whereupon,  at  12:40  p.m.,  the  subcommittee  adjourned.) 


APPENDIX 


COMMUNIST   ANTI-AMERICAN   RIOTS— MOB   VIOLENCE 
AS  AN  INSTRUMENT  OF  RED  DIPLOMACY  ^ 

Introduction 

Within  the  last  15  years,  Communists  have  staged  a  series  of  anti-American 
riots  in  Latin  America.  Since  these  actions  have  done  serious  injury  to  the 
United  States  and  to  its  relations  with  Latin  American  nations,  and  oince  there 
is  every  likelihood  of  the  recurrence  of  these  riots,  the  Senate  Interiial  Security 
Subcommittee  has  deemed  it  advisable  to  direct  a  staff  study  of  these  demonstra- 
tions with  a  view  to  determining  the  techniques  employed  and  the  purposes 
sought.  For  the  most  part,  reliance  has  been  placed  upon  the  press  reports  of 
events  as  they  occurred,  analyzed  and  interpreted  in  the  light  of  known  Commu- 
nist techniques  and  theory.  The  analysis  deals  with  the  following  anti-Ameri- 
can riots:  April  10,  1948,  in  Bogotd,  Colombia:  March  13,  1958,  in  Caracas, 
Venezuela  ;  and  March  3, 1959,  at  La  Paz,  Bolivia. 

The  traditions  of  American  diplomacy  are  predicated  upon  ijeaceful  negotia- 
tion with  duly  authorized  representatives  of  other  nations  on  the  basis  of  solemn 
agreements  and  treaties,  in  accord  with  international  law  and  usage.  Our  inter- 
national relations  do  not  contemplate  and  seldom  anticipate  efforts  to  force  the 
hand  of  governments  through  mob  action  manipulated  by  trained  Soviet  agents. 
It  is  with  this  new  and  serious  feature  of  the  present  cold  war,  which  must  be 
faced  by  the  United  States,  that  this  study  deals. 

The  first  operation  we  propose  to  examine  is  the  rioting  which  occurred  on 
April  9  and  10,  1948,  in  Bogota,  Colombia. 

The  Plot  To  Torpedo  the  Inter-American  Conference 

PREPARING  THE  GROUND 

The  Ninth  Inter-American  Conference,  including  21  American  Republics,  was 
called  for  March  30,  1948,  for  the  purpose  of  adopting  a  charter  reaffirming  the 
solidarity  of  the  American  states,  pledging  the  member  nations  to  mutual  defense 
and  resistance  to  the  threat  of  international  communism.  The  New  York  Times, 
of  January  10,  1948,  first  announced  that  Gen.  George  C.  Marshall,  then  Secretary 
of  State,  would  attend  this  meeting.  A  draft  of  a  basic  agreement  on  inter- 
American  cooperation  prepared  by  the  Economic  and  Social  Council  of  the  Pan 
American  Union  was  released  by  the  Department  of  State  on  February  25,  1948. 
Almost  immediately  the  combined  forces  of  the  Latin  American  Communist 
apparatus  went  into  high  gear  in  opposition  to  the  Conference.  This  was  dis- 
closed by  testimony  given  by  Adm.  R.  H.  Hillenkoetter,  then  Chief  of  the  Central 
Intelligence  Agency,  before  a  House  Subcommittee  on  Executive  Expenditures, 
to  which  he  presented  intercepts  from  Communist  sources  which  he  had  included 
in  admonitoiT  dispatches  sent  by  him  to  the  State  Department  well  in  advance 
of  the  Conference. 

"January  2,  IMS. — At  present  there  is  no  real  opportunity  for  the  Communist 
Party  to  demonstrate  against  the  imperialist  program  of  the  United  States,  but 
a  vigorous  anti-imperialist  campaign  has  been  prepared  for  the  Pan-American 
Conference  and  will  be  launched  shortly  before  the  Conference  convenes  in 
March." ' 

"January  23. — Mr.  X,  in  charge  of  drafting  the  policy  of  the  Communist  Party 
in  Colombia,  made  the  following  comment :  'The  Pan-American  Conference  will 
be  a  capitalistic,  imperialistic  conference.     Attempts  should  be  made  to  block 


1  This  document,  a  staff  study  by  the  Senate  Internal  Security  Subcommittee,  was  ordered 
Into  the  record  at  a  subsequent  subcommittee  meeting. 
»  New  York  Times,  Apr.  16,  1948,  p.  6. 

115 


116  COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH    THE    CARIBBEAN 

the  progress  of  the  Conference,  but  this  should  not  be  known  as  a  Communist 
activity.  The  party  should  refrain  from  open  activity  and  avoid  a  situation 
which  would  result  in  curtailment  of  the  party's  functions.'  "  ^ 

Admiral  Hillenkoetter  disclosed  also  the  backing  given  by  the  Soviet  Legation 
to  Dr.  Jorge  Eliecer  Gaitan,  popular  Liberal  Party  leader  of  Colombia,  whose 
assassination  set  off  the  April  9-10  rioting.     The  dispatch  declared : 

"January  29. — Mr.  G.,  the  leading  Colombian  Communist,  who  has  been  given 
the  task  of  overthrowing  the  Perez  (Conservative)  government,  boasts  that  he 
can  coimt  on  planes  and  artillery  when  necessary.  In  Bogota  this  group  had 
allegedly  stored  arms  and  explosives  in  17  houses.  Mr.  G.  is  also  reported  the 
Intermediary  between  the  Soviet  Legation  personnel  and  Gaitan,  to  whom  he 
furnished  money,  supposedly  for  his  Liberal  movement."  ' 

It  is  the  practice  of  Communist  organizations  to  .'jpend  considerable  effort  in 
preliminary  organized  preparations  for  proposed  riots.  Reliance  is- not  placed 
upon  spontaneity  or  accidental  circumstances.  Mass  sentiment  is  whipped  up. 
Organizations  and  party  members  are  carefully  mobilized.  Here  is  Admiral 
Hillenkoetter's  dispatch  of  February  2  by  way  of  illustration : 

"B^BEUARY  2. — The  working  plan  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Colombia  for  the 
period  February  15  to  July  29  outlines  the  following  tasks:  Organization  of 
public  mass  meetings ;  organization  of  60  meetings  of  cells  in  outlying  districts ; 
recruiting  new  members  for  the  party ;  the  organization  of  15  syndicates  in 
unions;  the  organization  of  party  cells  in  all  syndicates  (unions)  not  already 
organized ;  the  distribution  of  50,000  handbills ;  the  putting  up  of  3,000  posters 
during  the  Pan-American  Conference."  ^ 

The  above-described  preparations  necessitated  the  most  careful  supervision 
by  a  duly  appointed  committee  of  the  Colombian  Communist  Party,  as  described 
in  another  dispatch : 

"March  18. — :A  Communist  committee  has  been  appointed  to  watch  prepara- 
tions for  the  Pan-American  Conference."  ^ 

According  to  preliminary  reports  received  by  the  State  Department  prior  to 
the  Inter-American  Conference,  there  were  indications  of  molestations  against 
Conference  delegates,  sabotage  and  efforts  to  destroy  the  prestige  of  the  gathering 
and  its  participants.     A  March  30  dispatch  declared : 

"The  Colombian  Communist  Party  has  agreed  upoi.  a  program  of  agitation 
and  molestation  against  the  United  States,  Chilean,  Brazilian,  and  Argentine  dele- 
gations to  the  Pan-American  Conference  *  *  *  imperialist  delegations  must 
carry  away  with  them  an  impression  of  failure  and  loss  of  prestige."  ^ 

A  few  days  prior  to  the  April  9-10  riot,  the  Communist-controlled  Latin  Ameri- 
can Confederation  of  Labor  (CTAL),  headed  by  "Vicente  Lombard©  Toledano, 
adopted  resolutions  in  Mexico  City,  roundly  condemning  the  Inter-American 
Conference.* 

It  was  also  disclosed  that  as  early  as  March  24,  1948,  Dr.  Gaitan  had  been 
publicly  warned  by  U.S.  Ambassador  to  Bogotd,  Willard  L.  Beaulac,  that  the 
Communists  would  seek  to  break  up  the  Conference  and  try  to  place  the  blame  on 
the  Liberals." 

Incidentally  it  should  be  noted  that  the  Colombian  Communist  Party  claimed 
a  strength  of  10,000  out  of  a  population  of  about  11  million.  They  control  the 
Colombian  Federation  of  Labor,  which  is  the  dominant  labor  federation  of  the 
country.* 

WARNINGS   UNHEEDED 

The  reaction  of  the  representatives  of  the  United  States  to  these  timely  warn- 
ings was  typical  of  our  oflScial  disregard  and  contempt  for  the  power  of  Com- 
munist mass  agitation.  O.  J.  Libert,  State  Department  aid  in  BogotA,  and  Am- 
bassador Willard  L.  Beaulac  were  charged  by  Admiral  Hillenkoetter  with  failure 
to  forward  these  messages  to  the  State  Department  in  Washington.  Mr.  Libert 
vetoed  sending  the  warning  to  Secretary  Marshall's  security  oflBcers  because 
he  thought  Bogota  police  protection  "adequate,"  and  he  did  not  wish  to  "alarm 
the  delegates  unduly."  °  Former  Secretary  of  State  George  C.  Marshall  was 
quoted  by  the  State  Department  press  officer,  Lincoln  White,  as  saying  in  the 
course  of  some  "salty  remarks"  that  it  was  "quite  ridiculous  to  suppose  that  the 
21  American  Republics  should  even  consider  being  intimidated  by  the  protesta- 
tions of  one  kind  or  another  from  Communists,  or  anyone  else." 

Meanwhile  the  Communists  simply  waited  for  the  most  propitious  moment 
to  strike. 


2  New  York  Times,  Apr.  16,  1948,  p.  6. 

s Ibid. 

*  U.S.  News  &  World  Report,  Apr.  23,  1948,  pp.  13,  14% 

»  New  York  Times,  Apr.  16,  1948,  p.  6. 


COIVIMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH    THE    CARIBBEAN  117 

THE  ASSASSINATION  OF  JORGE  E.  GAITAN 

The  subcommittee  is  in  possession  of  a  copy  of  a  letter  from  Bernardo  Ibanez, 
Chilean  president  of  the  Inter-American  Confederation  of  Workers,  to  Serafino 
Romualdi,  secretary  of  international  relations  of  the  same  organization  and 
inter-American  representative  of  the  AFL-CIO.  This  letter  describes  in  detail 
the  events  of  the  fatal  April  9.  We  quote  from  excerpts  published  in  the  Inter- 
American  Labor  Nevps  for  May  1948.  Mr.  Ibanez  had  an  appointment  with 
Jorge  E.  Gaitan,  whom  he  pictured  as  "a  young  lawyer,  only  47  years  old,  he 
had  been  one  of  the  candidates  in  the  past  presidential  elections  and  was  at 
the  time  the  first  choice  to  succeed  the  Chief  Executive"  of  Colombia. 

Mr.  Ibanez  relates  Gaitan's  dealings  with  the  Communists  as  follows : 

"Notwithstanding  the  fact  that  the  Communists  surrounded  him  with  friendli- 
ness and  flattery,  Gaitan  maintained  an  independent  and  firm  r.ttitude  with 
them,  as  he  stated  publicly  on  the  eve  of  the  inauguration  of  the  IX  Pan- 
American  Conference.  In  those  days  there  was  talk  in  Bogota  that  disturbances 
would  occur  and  that  the  stage  was  being  set  to  sabotage  the  Conference. 
Gaitan  hastened  to  determine  who  was  responsible  and  denounced  the  planned 
provocations  as  acts  against  democracy  and  the  unity  of  the  Americas.  He  stated 
his  repudiation  of  such  acts." 

Mr.  Ibanez  arranged  an  interview  with  Mr.  Gaitan  for  Friday,  April  9  at  5  p.m. 
However,  as  Gaitan  was  leaving  his  office  in  the  Nieto  Building  at  1 :05  p.m.  of 
the  same  day,  he  was  hit  by  four  bullets  from  a  revolver  fired  by  an  unidentified 
person  who  was  immediately  torn  to  pieces  by  an  infuriatetl  crowd,  making 
identification  impossible.  That  was  the  spark  which  set  off  the  ensuing  confla- 
gration.    It  was  the  moment  for  which  the  Communists  had  been  waiting. 

In  commenting  upon  the  assassination,  Mr.  Ibanez  declared  significantly : 

"Both  the  personality  of  Dr.  Gaitan  and  the  circumstances  surrounding  his  as- 
sassination force  me  to  think  that  the  events  that  took  place  correspond  pre- 
cisely to  the  method  of  crime  and  provocation  peculiar  to  the  Russians.  They 
needed  an  appropriate  victim  who  could  prevent  the  holding  of  the  Confer- 
ence, and  they  selected  the  most  prominent  person.  Dr.  Gaitan." 

Colombian  President  Ospina  Perez  in  a  communique  declared  that  Dr.  'iaitan 
had  been  "killed  by  a  person  apparently  of  Communist  aflBliation."  " 

Congressman  Donald  J.  Jackson  of  California  was  in  Bogota  at  the  time  as  an 
observer  for  the  American  Government  at  the  Ninth  Conference  of  American 
States.    Here  is  his  comment  on  the  assassination  : 

"Whether  or  not  the  assassination  of  the  liberal  leader  and  idol,  Jorge  Gaitan, 
was  an  act  of  the  Communists,  a  disgruntled  Liberal,  or  the  Conservative  ad- 
ministration itself  will  probably  never  be  known,  so  rapid  was  the  action  by 
which  the  assassin  was  hauled  through  milling  mobs  and  lynched  within  sight 
of  thousands  *  *  *  It  is  enough  to  know  that  the  shots  fired  by  his  hand  not 
only  gave  the  signal  for  one  of  the  most  violent  uprisings  in  the  history  of  the 
Western  Hemisphere,  but,  what  is  more  important,  gave  the  United  States  and 
the  other  Republics  of  the  continent  a  closeup  view  of  what  any  country  can 
expect  in  the  face  of  organized  mob  violence."  ^ 

THE  CONFLAGBATION  BURSTS  FORTH 

We  present  the  views  of  various  trained  observers  on  the  scene  regarding  the 
methods  by  which  the  Communists  exploited  the  indignation  of  the  people  of 
Bogota  over  the  assassination  of  Gaitan,  how  they  utilized  the  occasion  to  dis- 
rupt the  Inter-American  Conference  and  whip  up  anti-American  hysteria  and 
acts  of  violence  against  American  property  and  individuals.  This  will  give  a  broad 
composite  picture. 

First  we  present  Mr.  Ibanez'  story  of  how  the  Communists  carried  out  their 
well-laid  plans : 

"Fifteen  minutes  after  the  attack  on  Gaitan,  all  the  radio  broadcasting  stations 
in  Bogota  were  taken  over  by  the  Communists  through  workers  and  students. 
The  radio  stations  were  inciting  the  people  to  revolt  against  the  Government, 
against  the  Conference,  against  Yankee  imperialism,  etc.  Precise  instructions 
were  being  issued  to  plunder  arms  deposits,  hardware  stoi-es  and  gunsmiths' 
shops,  the  department  stores,  the  Government  buildings  ;  the  police  precincts,  and 
the  army  barracks.  An  hour  later  the  crowd,  instigated  by  the  Communists,  in- 
vaded the  capitol  or  Parliament  Building,  where  the  Pan-American  Conference 
was  being  held,  destroying  the  luxurious  equipment  with  which  it  had  been 

8  New  York  Times,  Apr.  10,  1948.  p.  1. 

'  Congressional  Record,  Apr.  15,  1948,  p.  4559. 


118 


COMMUNIST    THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 


furnished.  But  the  incident  that  attracted  my  attention  most  was  the  fact  that 
the  rioters  concentrated  on  the  destruction  of  the  offices  of  the  Chilean  and  U.S. 
delegations.  In  my  opinion  this  was  due  to  the  firm  anticommunistic  attitude 
of  these  two  delegations.  The  Chilean  and  U.S.  flags  were  trampled  upon  by  the 
crowd,  while  the  documents,  typewriters,  file  cabinets,  etc.,  were  being  destroyed 
or  plundered." 

Mr.  Ibanez  concludes  with  this  estimate  of  the  events  which  took  place  : 
"The  orders  that  were  given  to  the  people,  the  propaganda  carried  over 
the  radio  broadcasts,  the  method  of  plundering  to  be  put  into  practice,  the 
unusual  activity  shown  by  the  Soviet  Embassy  during  the  first  moments  of  the 
events,  etc.,  all  prove  that  this  assassination  was  a  coldblooded  and  ferocious 
international  act  of  incitement  conducted  by  the  Russians  on  the  weak  democ- 
racy of  Colombia,  against  the  interests  of  the  people  of  the  Americas.  Some- 
thing I  was  able  to  witness  personally  was  the  well-planned  organized  yell- 
ing of  the  crowds  against  President  Gonzalez  Videla  of  my  country.  I  heard 
it  from  different  groups  of  paraders  led  by  Communists."  * 


Jimenez  de  Quesada,  in  the  center  of  the  city,  where  some  of  the  worst  fighting 
of  the  revolt  took  place.  Electric  trolley  wires  were  ripped  down  and  private 
passenger  cars — including  several  vehicles  owned  by  the  American  Embassy — 
destroyed  or  stolen.  At  extreme  left  above  is  the  Government  Palace,  which 
mobs  looted  and  set  ablaze. 

Life  magazine,  April  26,  1948,  page  27. 


Juan  C.  Lara,  vice  president  of  the  Confederation  of  Workers,  who  resides  in 
Bogota,  described  the  events  following  the  assassination  of  Dr.  Gaitan  as  follows : 

"Then  began  the  radio's  imprecations  against  the  Government.  They  cried 
in  the  streets.  Transportation  was  suspended.  Since  it  was  luncheon  hour  all 
commercial  establishments  were  closed,  and  normal  activities  suspended.     No 

*  Inter-Am«rican  Labor  News,  May  1948,  p.  2, 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  119 

one  took  care  of  order  or  requests.    There  were  ears  only  for  the  calls  for  dis- 
order and  the  fall  of  the  Government,  public  disorder  and  civil  war. 

"In  such  a  combustible  general  state,  the  Communists  obtained  charge  of  some 
broadcasting  stations  giving  orders  to  assault  the  hardware  stores,  places  of 
sale  of  armed  ammunition,  and  all  places  where  there  were  possibilities  of 
obtaining  destructive  weapons  in  order  to  organize  the  'popular  militia.'  First 
the  Lit)eral  students  and  with  them  some  Communists  took  the  National  Radio 
of  Colombia  and  used  it  as  the  center  of  agitation  against  the  National  Govern- 
ment, and  then  as  a  station  for  transmitting  plainly  Communist  information. 
It  was  possible  to  hear  over  the  air  the  fight  between  the  Communists  and  the 
students  for  control  of  the  station,  but  the  armed  Communists  forced  the  students 
to  retire.  Then  the  National  Radio  transmitted  orders  with  names  to  persons 
and  places  in  the  country.  Among  other  orders  there  were  those  to  assault, 
in  additions  to  weapons,  living  persons.  Thus  commenced  the  sacking  of  all 
business  places  at  about  4  in  the  afternoon. 

"The  burnings  commenced  during  the  first  hours,  more  as  a  gesture  of  protest 
than  as  an  end  in  themselves.  Nevertheless,  there  are  grave  indications,  if  one 
studies  which  were  the  buildings  burned.  These  were,  in  the  afternoon  of 
Friday  the  9th:  The  Ministry  of  National  Education  (in  which  I  work),  the 
Ministry  of  Justice,  the  Ministry  of  Foreign  Affairs,  the  Palace  of  the  Government 
of  Cundinamarca,  the  Palace  of  Justice,  the  apostolic  headquarters,  the  Ministry 
of  the  Government,  the  Episcopal  Palace,  the  building  of  the  newspaper  El  Siglo, 
the  detective  headquarters,  and  the  identification  section  for  natives  and 
foreigners."  * 

Let  us  call  as  the  next  witness  Congressman  Donald  J.  Jackson  as  he  relates 
how  the  "organized  Red  leadership  has  bared  its  teeth  in  an  expression  of  riot, 
pillage,  and  slaughter" ; 

"The  proportion  of  Communists  and  Communist  sympathizers  in  the  maddened 
throngs,  which  for  3  days  looted  and  burned  their  own  national  institutions  and 
facilities  in  Colombia,  probably  did  not  exceed  5  percent  of  the  population,  but 
under  the  prodding  and  harangues  of  the  Red  leaders  they  lost  their  sense  of 
direction  and  purpose,  and  turned  from  a  possibly  legitimate  expression  of 
national  dissatisfaction  with  the  Conservative  government  to  violence,  bloodshed, 
arson,  and  looting.  Grief  for  the  untimely  death  of  Gaitan  turned  in  a  single 
hour  to  unrestricted  mob  violence,  which  spared  neither  shop,  church,  public 
utility,  or  institution  of  public  service.  Inflamed  by  initial  success  the  mobs 
milled  in  the  streets,  armed  with  whatever  weapons  they  could  obtain,  smashing 
windows  and  doors,  overturning  streetcars  and  buses,  looting  shops,  markets, 
and  stores,  and  then  setting  the  torch  to  the  shambles  remaining.  What  could 
be  carried  was  taken,  what  could  not  be  lifted  was  smashed.  Bolts  of  textiles 
were  carried  into  the  streets  to  be  hauled  their  entire  lengths  through  the 
gutters.    Wanton  and  useless  destruction  was  the  order  of  the  day. 

******* 

"On  Friday  last  your  observer,  together  with  three  other  members  of  the  U.S. 
delegation,  was  having  lunch  in  the  fine  restaurant  located  in  the  capitol  base- 
ment. Gaitan  was  murdered  shortly  after  1  p.m.  on  Friday  and  within  minutes 
the  mobs  were  surging  through  the  plaza.  The  unarmed  police  were  powerless 
to  cope  with  the  situation  and  were  brushed  aside  by  the  rioters  as  they  streamed 
into  the  building.  Red  flags  were  In  profusion  and  I  personally  saw  hammer-and- 
sickle  flags.  Using  stones,  bricks,  machetes,  and  boards,  the  mob  commenced 
a  methodical  tour  of  destruction  which  was  to  render  the  first  floor  of  the 
capitol  building  a  shambles  within  a  matter  of  minutes.  The  police  reorganized 
and  in  a  short  while  managed  to  eject  the  rioters  from  the  building.  ♦  *  * 


•  Inter-American  Labor  News,  May  1948,  p.  3. 


120 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 


Storming  capitol,  mob  surges  inside  Inter-American  Conference  rooms.     Records 

were  tossed  out  windows. 

Life  magazine,  April  26,  1948.  pns:t>  26. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH    THE    CARIBBEAN  121 

"In  the  meanwhile,  the  surging  mobs  turned  their  attention  to  automobiles, 
streetcars,  and  buses  in  the  plaza  square,  and  within  2  hours  after  the  initial 
outbreak  much  of  Bogota's  transportation  was  in  flames  and  the  columns  of 
black  smoke  which  were  to  characterize  this  city  for  the  next  3  days  were  rolling 
skyward.  In  every  group  there  appeared  to  be  a  leader  with  a  plan.  Orators 
harangued  the  mobs  and  the  most  frequently  heard  phrase  was  'Abajo,'  which 
means  'down  with.'  After  the  first  few  senseless  minutes  of  apparent  confusion, 
the  movement  gained  added  impetus  and  a  new  sense  of  organization.  Looting 
broke  out  and  the  first  fires  in  the  business  district  were  started.  Firing,  which 
was  rare  in  the  first  several  hours,  became  more  general  as  night  approached."  " 

The  New  York  Times  published  a  few  dispatches  from  correspondents  which 
gave  additional  sidelights  on  what  occurred  : 

"A  revolution  touched  off  by  the  assassination  of  a  leftist  liberal  leader  broke 
up  the  Inter-American  Conference  today.  Savage  mobs,  armed  with  guns  and 
machetes,  wrecked  the  capitol,  communications,  and  other  buildings,  after  the 
lynched  body  of  the  alleged  assassin  was  dragged  before  the  Presidential 
Palace.  *  *  *  The  rioting  was  furthered  by  broadcasts  over  a  captured  Govern- 
ment radio  station,  with  speakers  urging  widespread  revolution. 

"A  small  bomb  exploded  outside  the  U.S.  Embassy  and  delegation  buildings. 
Only  windows  were  broken. 

"Looting  of  liquor  and  hardware  stores  was  widespread.  Trolley  cars  were 
turned  over  and  fires  were  raging." 

Another  dispatch  described  the  wounding  of  John  Powell,  of  Nashville,  Tenn., 
a  diplomatic  courier  of  the  State  Department.  He  had  been  attacked  outside 
the  American  Embassy  by  rioters  with  machetes.     His  dispatch  bag  was  cut. 

Another  dispatch  disclosed  the  coordination  of  the  Communist-controlled  Con- 
federation of  Workers  of  Colombia  with  the  efforts  of  those  in  charge  of  the 
uprising.  This  organization,  through  its  legal  adviser,  Carlos  Henry  Pareja, 
called  for  a  general  strike  and  instructed  its  members  to  arm  themselves  in  the 
streets  or  in  hardware  stores.  Diego  Montana  Cueller,  Communist  legal  adviser 
of  the  Federation  of  Petro  Workers  (CTC),  announced  that  the  people's  revolu- 
tion was  triumphant,  aided  by  elements  of  the  police  and  the  Army." 

THE  BED  HAND  OF  THE  COMMUNISTS 

The  fact  that  the  Communists  played  a  decisive  part  in  the  events  of  April 
9  and  10  is  corroborated  by  a  number  of  authoritative  sources.  Rafael  Azula 
Barera,  secretary  general  of  the  Colombian  presidency,  formally  blamed  the 
Communists  for  sabotaging  the  Inter-American  Conference.  He  charged  that 
Cuban,  Costa  Rican,  and  Honduran  Communists  had  participated  in  the  April  9 
attacks  on  the  Government  radio  stations.*^ 

Colombia's  President,  Ospina  Perez,  declared  that  Jorge  Eliecer  Gaitan  had 
been  "killed  by  a  person  apparently  of  Communist  affiliation."  He  further 
alleged  that  the  "trouble  was  a  Communist  maneuver."  " 

Then  Secretary  of  State,  George  C.  Marshall,  was  most  outspoken  in  placing 
the  blame  for  the  outbreak  on  the  Communist  Party  of  Colombia  and  the  Soviet 
Union.  Before  the  Inter -American  Conference  he  declared  emphatically  that 
the  revolt  had  been  Communist-inspired  and  added  : 

"This  situation  must  not  be  judged  on  a  local  basis,  however  tragic  the  im- 
mediate results  may  be  to  the  Colombian  Government  and  the  people.  The 
occurrence  goes  far  beyond  Colombia. 

"It  is  of  the  same  definite  pattern  as  the  occurrences  which  provoked  the 
strikes  in  France  and  Italy,  and  that  are  endeavoring  to  prejudice  the  situation 
in  Italy  for  the  elections  on  April  18." 

In  this  connection,  it  is  interesting  to  note  that  the  Colombian  Government 
announc-ed  that  2  Russians  and  13  other  foreign  agents  who  had  been  fighting 
with  the  rebels  had  been  captured.  Secretary  Marshall  revealed  that  other 
conference  delegates  held  the  Communists  responsible  for  the  Colombian  revolt." 

'0  Congressional  Record,  Apr.  15,  1948,  pp.  4559,  4560. 

"  New  York  Times,  Apr.  10,  1948,  p.  3. 

^  New  York  Times,  Apr.  11,  1959,  p.  3. 

"  New  York  Times,  Apr.  10,  1959,  pp.  1  and  3. 

*«  New  York  Timea,  Apr.  13,  194.8,  p.  1- 


122  COMMUNIST   THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

DAMAGE  DONE   BY  THE   REVOLT 

In  the  absence  of  an  overall  and  comprehensive  estimate  of  the  damage  done 
to  the  United  States  and  the  Inter-American  Conference  by  the  Communist  use 
of  mob  violence  as  a  means  of  diplomatic  pressure,  we  can  only  cite  the  following 
specific  facts. 

Congressman  Donald  J.  Jackson  has  given  an  illuminating  picture  of  the 
hazards  encountered  by  American  personnel : 

"Friday  night  found  the  U.S.  group  isolated  in  three  principal  locations,  al- 
though some  few  others  were  elsewhere  in  the  city.  At  the  U.S.  Embassy 
approximately  65  persons  under  the  d'  ection  of  Assistant  Secretary  of  State 
Norman  Armour,  were  completely  isolated  from  the  Ajnerican  delegation  head- 
quarters group  directly  across  the  street  in  the  Edificio  Americano  *  *  * 
Secretary  Marshall  and  others  of  the  U.S.  group  were  isolated  in  their  residences 
elsewhere  in  the  city. 

"Communications  on  Friday  night,  save  for  the  radio  in  the  Embassy  building, 
w^ere  nonexistent.  Fires  almost  completely  circled  the  two  buildings  and  a  small 
blaze  in  the  basement  of  the  Embassy  building  was  taken  under  control  before 
it  could  seriously  damage  the  structure.  There  was  no  food  available  for  the 
Americans  in  either  building,  although  others  of  us  at  the  delegation  hotel  were 
more  fortunate  in  this  respect.  During  Friday  night  a  crude  bomb  was  thrown 
Into  the  U.S.  delegation  headquarters,  but  no  casualties  resulted  *  *  * 

"Upon  orders  of  Secretary  of  State  Marshall,  evacuations  of  all  but  vitally 
needed  personnel  commenced  on  Saturday.  Communications  were  still  out 
of  order,  but  armed  convoys  were  able  to  move  from  place  to  place  under  heavy 
sniper  fire.  A  high  priority  for  evacuations  was  assigned  to  delegates  from 
all  republics  and  many  other  men,  women,  and  children  of  the  Latin-American 
coimtries  were  flown  out  of  Bogotd  by  the  20th  Troop  Transport  Command, 
based  in  Panama.  Incoming  planes  carried  rations  in  case  of  food  shortages,  and 
assurances  were  given  all  delegations  that  such  rations  would  be  made  available 
to  them  as  needed."  " 

Bertram  H.  Hulen,  reporting  for  the  New  York  Times,  stated  on  April  12 
that  "eight  Argentines  departed  last  night,  including  a  major  economic  oflBcial. 
In  his  absence  it  is  difficult  to  see  how  detailed  economic  arrangements  can  be 
concluded.  Notwithstanding  assurances  on  safety,  many  members  of  the  United 
States  delegation  were  evacuated  by  planes  today."  " 

Five  days  after  the  outbreak,  after  a  temporary  suspension,  the  Inter- American 
Conference  was  reconvened  in  a  school  building  in  suburban  Bogota." 

The  Communist  estimate  of  what  they  had  achieved  by  the  Bogota  riots  is 
summarized  by  Joseph  Starobin,  the  Daily  Worker's  star  reporter  on  foreign 
affairs,  in  an  article  entitled  "What  Bogota  Blow-Up  ReveaLs."  He  stated  that 
"Interruption  of  the  Foreign  Ministers  parley  is  a  sock  in  the  jaw  to  the  big 
business  men  of  the  State  Department  *  *  •  the  world  has  suddenly  seen 
America's  feet  of  clay."  " 

"  Conjrre.'^.sional  Record,  Apr.  15,  1948,  p.  4560 
^New  York  Times,  Apr.  13,  1948,  p.  1. 
"  Life  magazine,  Apr.  26,  1948,  p.  2a. 
M  Daily  Worker,  Apr.  12,  1948,  p.  3. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH    THE    CARIBBEAN 


123 


Conference  reconvenes  on  April  14  in  a  school  3  miles  from  Bogotd.  Here  the 
steering  committee  (Secretary'  Marshall  sits  at  left  center)  discusses  agenda  for 
remainder  of  conference. 

Life  magazine,  April  26,  1948,  page  28. 

Starobin  continued  his  estimate  a  few  days  later,  admitting  the  role  of  the 
Colombian  Communists,  as  follows  : 

"The  Conference  of  Foreign  Ministers,  where  Secretary  of  State  George  C. 
Marshall  was  trying  to  dovetail  Latin  America  into  the  Marshall  plan,  was 
rudely  interrupted. 

"All  that  Marshall  could  say  to  explain  this  sudden  disclosure  of  the  real  con- 
ditions in  Latin  America  was  to  blame  it  on  'international  communism'.  *  *  * 

"I  don't  mean  to  say  that  Colombia's  Communists  stood  aside  from  the  revolu- 
tionary movement.  That  would  do  an  injustice  to  the  Communist  Party,  which 
*  *  *  polled  7,000  votes  in  the  municipal  elections  last  fall,  played  an  important 
part  in  the  Colombian  Confederation  of  Labor  and  sought  to  cooperate  with  the 
leftwing  Liberals. 

"Communist  leaders,  like  36-year-old  Gilberto  Vieria,  or  former  Senator 
Jorge  Regueros  Peralta,  or  the  CTC  secretary,  Pedro  Abella,  certainly  sided  with 
the  people  in  their  anger  over  Gaitan's  murder."  ^* 

It  should  be  noted  that  the  Communist  Party  of  Colombia  was  oflScially  repre- 
sented at  the  21st  Congress  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  Soviet  Union  held  in 
Moscow  in  January  1959  by  its  secretary-general,  Gilberto  Viera  White,  and 

"  Dally  Worker,  Apr.  18,  1948,  p.  12. 


124  COMMUNIST    THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

Joaquin  Moreno  and  that  the  party  was  also  represented  at  the  meeting  of  the 
Communist  and  Workers  Parties  held  in  Moscow,  November  14  to  16,  1957,  at 
which  a  sj)ecial  commission  was  appointed  to  deal  with  Latin  American  questions. 

Demonstration  Against  Vice  President  Nixon 

preparing  the  ground 

Vice  President  Richard  M.  Nixon  was  expected  to  arrive  at  Caracas,  Venezuela, 
on  May  13,  1958.  Well  before  that  time  Radio  Moscow  broadcast  its  incendiary 
propaganda  to  South  America  in  Spanish.  On  April  27,  commentator  Serveyev 
remarked : 

"U.S.  Vice  President  Nixon  is  once  again  getting  ready  to  tour  Latin  Ameri- 
ica  *  *  *  Bolivia,  Venezuela,  Brazil,  and  Mexico  are  not  hiding  their  discontent 
over  the  harm  done  to  them  by  the  recession  in  the  United  States  *  *  *.  As  is 
clear  from  the  U.S.  press,  recent  events  in  Latin  America  have  shown  how  un- 
popular and  odious  U.S.  policy  is.  That  is  why,  as  the  New  York  papers  point 
out,  Nixon  will  hear  grave  complaints  *  *  ♦". 

The  Moscow  radio  beamed  to  Brazil  in  Portuguese,  continued  to  whip  up  Latin 
American  sentiment  against  Mr.  Nixon  in  a  broadcast  by  Borisev  on  April  30, 
1958: 

"U.S.  Vice  President  Nixon  arrived  in  Montevideo  on  April  29  to  pay  an  official 
visit  *  *  *.  Some  startling  events  took  place  in  Latin  America  on  the  eve 
of  Nixon's  tour.  An  anti-American  mass  demonstration  took  place  in  Bolivia. 
President  Ibanez  of  Chile  refused  to  carry  out  an  official  visit  to  the  United 
States  in  protest  against  U.S.  tariff  jwlicy.  In  Peru,  Chile,  Colombia,  Venezuela, 
and  several  other  countries  there  is  a  powerful  upsurge  of  the  strike  movement 
and  this  has  an  open  anti-imperialist  character  *  *  *.  He  [Nixon]  was  forced 
to  cancel  a  meeting  with  the  Montevideo  students  federation  *  *  *.  His  meet- 
ing with  trade  union  leaders  was  put  off.  Some  groups  of  Paraguayan  emigres 
sent  him  a  telegram  protesting  agaiivst  his  intended  visit  to  Paraguay." 

It  is  significant  to  note  with  what  attention  Moscow  through  its  Latin  Ameri- 
can agents,  apparently  followed  the  course  of  the  Nixon  tour. 

Regarding  Nixon's  reception  at  San  Marcos  University  in  Peru,  Radio  Moscow 
broadcast  on  May  10  in  Spanish  to  Latin  America  by  Andrianov  declared  that 
Nixon  received  a  hostile  reception  and  that  "a  similar  reception  was  accorded 
to  him  by  Peruvians  in  other  parts  of  the  country,  to  the  point  where  the  visit 
became  a  veritable  scandal."  Moscow  broadcasts  as  early  as  April  26  ridiculed 
Pan  American  Week  and  declared  that  Nixon  was  assigned  the  almost  impossible 
mission  of  trying  to  assuage  mounting  Latin  American  discontent.  Sixteen  anti- 
American  commentaries  were  broadcast  to  Latin  America  from  April  26  through 
May  13.  Thus  tlie  Moscow  radio  did  its  share  to  fan  the  flames  of  anti- Ameri- 
can hysteria  preliminary  to  Caracas. 

SAN  MARCOS  UNIVERSITY  OUTBREAK 

In  a  sense,  events  at  San  Marcos  University  in  Peru  constituted  a  dress  re- 
hearsal and  springboard  for  the  subsequent  rioting  at  Caracas.  Vice  President 
Nixon  was  scheduled  to  appear  at  the  university  on  May  8.  Before  that  day  Mr. 
Nixon  had  received  a  number  of  warnings  of  a  Communist-directed  demonstra- 
tion against  him,  including  one  from  Theodore  C.  Achilles,  American  Ambassador 
at  Lima,  Peru.^ 

The  New  York  Times  of  May  11,  1958,  announced  that  "Rumors  had  cir- 
culated that  Peru's  small  but  vocal  Communist  Party  planned  a  violent  demon- 
stration if  Mr.  Nixon  made  a  scheduled  visit  to  San  Marcos  University." 

Lee  de  Vore,  a  Montana  journalism  student  at  San  Marcos,  described  the 
background  at  the  university  as  follows  in  the  Montana  Kaimin,  newspaper  of 
the  University  of  Montana  : 

"It  is  common  knowledge  that  several  of  the  professors  are  top  men  in  various 
leftwing  parties."  ^ 

She  also  describes  the  elaborate  preparations  made  by  the  Communist-led 
students  federation  : 

"For  several  days  before  Nixon's  proposed  visit  and  informal  talk  at  San 
Marcos,  handbills  and  pamphlets  had  been  passed  among  the  students — in  effect, 
'Go  home,  Nixon — we  don't  want  the  monopolistic  imperialists — what  about  the 
proposed  mineral   tariffs — what  about  the  tightened  import  quotas — go  away 

»  Congressional  Record,  May  26,  1958,  p.  9429. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH    THE    CARIBBEAN  125 

Gringos — all  imperialists,  etc'  These  warnings  began  to  appear  in  red  on  the 
walls  inside  the  university  as  well."  '°- 

Thus  the  Communists  did  not  hesitate  to  employ  in  their  agitation  both  eco- 
nomic and  racial  appeals  based  upon  their  Marxist-Leninist  philosophy. 

Miss  de  Vore  was  an  eyewitness  of  the  ensuing  turmoil  provoked  by  the  Com- 
munists, which  she  described : 

"Politics  waxed  hot  on  all  sides,  and  at  10  a  Communist-inspired  demonstra- 
tion began  outside.  This  ignited  a  counterdemonstration  inside — inspired  by 
several  rabble-rousing  leaders  of  the  strongest  party  in  the  country,  the  Apristas. 

"During  the  commotion  Nixon  arrived,  had  been  insulted  and  repulsed  by  the 
Communists  and  sympathizers  outside.  *  *  *  Blood-red  signs  of  'Go  Home, 
Nixon,'  'Shark,'  and  'Get  Out'  began  to  appear  below  me  and  the  atmosphere 
changed.  *  ♦  * 

"Then  the  call  was  'to  the  streets,'  and  'to  the  Plaza  of  San  Martin.'  The 
plaza,  modem  center  of  Lima,  is  faced  by  the  Hotel  Bolivar  where  Nixon  stayed, 
the  American  Embassy,  and  other  important  Government  buildings.  So  like 
a  stream  of  ants,  the  2,000-odd  students  and  spectators  vacated  the  university 
and  ran  down  the  center  of  the  busy  streets  to  the  plaza.  *  *  * 

"The  mob's  tirst  act  was  to  tear  the  American  flag  from  the  center  of  a  floral 
wreath  placed  earlier  by  Nixon  at  the  foot  of  the  statue  of  San  Martin.  The 
demonstration  continued  at  the  frantic  gestures  of  the  party  leaders.  *  *  * 

"I  gained  a  sixth-story  window  at  the  Hotel  Bolivar  *  *  *  in  time  to  see 
Nixon's  car  coming  up  the  street.  The  crowd  saw  him,  too,  and  converged  upon 
him,  barring  the  car's  path  and  forcing  him  and  his  party  to  walk  the  last 
block  to  the  hotel.  *  *  *  Nixon,  walking  as  rapidly  as  he  dared,  approached  the 
hotel  with  a  wave  and  smile  in  the  face  of  insults  and  missiles." 

On-the-scene  observer  Tad  Szulc,  New  York  Times  correspondent,  summarized 
the  events  as  follows : 

"Vice  President  Richard  M.  Nixon  was  spat  upon,  grazed  on  the  neck  by  a 
stone,  shoved  and  booed  as  he  marched  twice  today  into  mobs  of  Oommunist-led 
demonstrators  demanding  his  ouster  from  the  country. 

"In  the  course  of  anti-U.S.  riots  set  off  by  Mr.  Nixon's  presence,  the  Com- 
munists also  desecrated  the  U.S.  flag.  They  ripped  out  flowers  that  formed  it 
in  a  wreath  laid  by  Mr.  Nixon  at  the  foot  of  the  statue  of  Jose  de  San  Martin, 
a  leader  of  South  America's  fight  for  independence  from  Spain. 

"The  Vice  President  became  the  target  of  a  Communist  barrage  of  invective 
and  stones,  bottles,  eggs,  and  oranges  when,  in  a  dramatic  last-minute  gesture, 
he  decided  to  defy  the  demonstrators  who  had  massed  in  front  of  Lima's  Unl- 
varsity  of  San  Marcos,"  ** 

"  Ibid. 

«  New  York  Times,  May  9,  1958,  p.  1. 


66492   O  -61 


126 


COMMUNIST    THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 


Screaming  at  Nixon,  rioters  wave  signs  telling  Nixon  to  get  out,  asking  fi-eedom 
for  Puerto  Riean  who  inspired  1950  Truman  assassination  try. 

Life  magazine,  May  19, 195S,  p.  22. 


VENEZUELAN    COMMUNIST   PAKTY    PREPARES 

The  Venezuelan  Communist  newspaper,  Tribuna  Popular,  on  May  3  sounded  the 
incendiary  keynote.  "Nixon  No"  the  publication  screamed  in  inch-high  red  type. 
May  1  demonstrations  backed  by  the  Communist  Party  and  its  controlled  labor 
unions  and  front  organizations  called  for  proletarian  unity  against  American 
imperialism.  Much  was  made  of  the  fact  tliat  Mr.  Nixon  was  scheduled  to  arrive 
in  Caracas  on  May  13,  the  traditional  Latin  American  bad-luck  day. 

The  Communist  weekly  devoted  almost  all  of  its  24  pages  to  a  denunciation 
of  Mr.  Nixon,  the  United  States  and  pro-American  individuals  in  Venezuela.  On 
the  front  page  of  the  May  10  issue  appeared  a  hate-inspiring  cartoon  of  Vice 
President  Nixon  with  fanglike  teeth  giving  him  the  appearance  of  a  wild  beast. 

Page  1  of  the  May  10  issue  was  devoted  to  eight  questions  around  which  the 
Communists  were  concentrating  their  agitation  including :  alleged  U.S.  relations 
with  dictators  ;  petroleum  restrictions ;  Yankee  imperialism  ;  Little  Rock ;  denials 
of  visas  to  intellectuals ;  atomic  testing ;  intervention  of  American  business ; 
equal  pay  for  equal  work  in  United  States  and  Venezuelan  oilfields. 

The  caption  "Tricky  Dick,"  which  appeared  in  connection  with  pictures  of 
Mr.  Nixon  in  Tribuna  Popular,  turned  up  later  on  signs  with  which  the  crowd 
greeted  him  on  his  arrival.  This  appellation  appeared  originally  in  the  Com- 
munist Daily  Worker  in  the  United  States.  There  were  also  pointed  references 
to  "piedras" — rocks.  It  was  not  uncommon  to  find  the  name  of  a  leading  Com- 
munist signed  to  an  important  editorial  in  a  non-Communist  paper.  No  channel 
for  Communist  agitation  was  overlooked.  The  Communist  press  set  the  pace 
for  the  entire  leftwing  press. 

The  spearhead  of  the  agitation  was  the  excitable,  Communist-controlled  and 
penetrated  student  organizations  including  Accion  Democratica  and  the  Union 
Republicana  Democratica,  which  held  many  preliminary  meetings  prior  to  the 
fateful  May  13.  Scripps-Howard  staff  writer,  Charles  Lucey,  who  addressed  a 
seminar  at  the  Central  University  of  Caracas  on  May  21,  declared  that  "effective 
spreading  of  the  Communist  line  and  doctrine  was  widely  apparent"  among  the 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH    THE    CARIBBEAN 


127 


128  COMMUNIST   THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

students.^  They  set  the  pace  for  other  non-Communist  but  leftist  student 
organlajatlons. 

SeraHno  Romualdi,  inter-American  representative  of  the  AFL-CIO,  has  called 
attention  to  active  Communist  penetration  of  Intellectual  and  student  circles  in 
Latin  America :  He  declared  : 

"There  is  reason  for  real  concern  over  the  penetration  that  Communists 
have  made  in  certain  Latin  American  intellectual  circles  and,  particularly,  in 
student  bodies  ♦  ♦  *.  The  intellectual  field,  in  all  its  many  ramifications,  still 
represents,  in  my  opinion,  the  main  immediate  goal  of  the  Communists  south 
of  the  Rio  Grande  *  ♦  *.  The  Communists  (in  Venezuela)  were  able  to  build 
upon  the  students'  strong  resentment  over  the  fact  that  Perez  Jimenez  and  Chief 
of  Police  Pedro  Estrada  were  granted  visas  to  enter  the  United  States. 

"Under  their  reign,  the  University  of  Caracas  had  been  closed  for  many 
months,  while  hundreds  of  students  were  arrested  and  tortured  by  the  secret 
police." 

Mr.  Romualdi  called  atteutiou  to  another  incident  which  was  highly  capitalized 
by  the  Communists,  through  their  publication  : 

"Additional  fuel  was  added  to  the  smoldering  resentment  with  the  publica- 
tion in  the  Communist  daily  newspaper  of  Caracas  of  a  photostatic  copy  of  a 
congratulatory  letter  which  Fletcher  Warren,  former  U.S.  Ambassador  to  Vene- 
zuela *  *  *  wrote  to  Estrade,  after  he  had  suppressed  the  first  large-scale  re- 
volt against  the  Perez  Jimenez  dictatorship  on  last  New  Year's  Day.  This  ♦  *  * 
was  fully  exploited  by  the  Communists  to  whip  up  an  anti-American  emotional 
climate."  '* 

Communists  are  prominent  in  the  field  of  journalism  and  a  Communist  is  a 
vice  president  of  the  Caracas  University  student  federation.  They  are  also 
prominent  in  the  school's  journalism  school  and  in  the  science  faculty.'' 

The  agility  of  the  student  youth  was  pat  to  active  use.  Red  letters  2  feet 
high  appeared  on  walls,  parapets,  and  underpasses,  calling  upon  Mr.  Nixon  to 
go  home,  drop  dead,  ttike  his  "imperialist  Yankee  thieves  and  murderers"  home 
with  him  and  asking  questions  about  Little  Rock.  During  the  weekend  preceding 
Mr.  Nixon's  visit  signs  reading  "Fuera  Nixon" — "Nixon  Go  Home" — ^were 
transformed  to  read  "Muera  Nixon" — "Nixon  Drop  Dead."  In  the  vilest  and 
most  xintranslatable  terms,  Nixon's  name  was  used  to  carry  the  message  that 
"Good  neighbors  are  neither  good  nor  neighbors."  '' 

In  order  to  further  aggravate  American-Venezuelan  relations,  the  Communist 
Tribuna  Popular  of  May  10  published  the  following  statement  ascribed  to 
Simon  Bolivar,  Venezuelan  Liberator  : 

"The  Uniteti  States  seems  destined  by  Providence  to  bring  misery  to  the 
Americans  in  the  name  of  liberty." 

This  quotation  was  auspiciously  requoted  by  Serbando  Garcia  Ponce,  a  Com- 
Jiiuuist  editorial  writer,  prior  to  the  events  of  May  13." 

William  Key,  administrative  assistant  to  Vice  President  Nixon,  confirmed  a 
report  from  E.E,  Baughmau,  Chief  of  the  U.S.  Secret  Service,  that  the  Commu- 
nist had  hired  a  Venezuelan  student  as  a  triggerman  in  an  attempt  on  Nixon's 
life.^ 

The  U.S.  Informatitm  Agency  has  reviewed  the  issues  of  the  weekly  Commu- 
nist paper,  Tribuna  Popular,  prior  to  the  May  13  demonstration.  On  May 
?>.  for  example,  the  issue  predicted  that  anti-Nixon  demonstrations  would  occur 
ill  other  parts  of  Latin  America.  The  issue  of  May  10  carried  inch-high  black 
lioadlines  reading  "Fuera  Nixon."  An  exact  translation  of  some  of  the  provoca- 
tive features  follows : 

"Caption  beneath  picture : 

"  'Tricky  Dick'  on  Leaving  Lima. 

"Mr.  Richard  Nixon,  Vice  President  of  the  United  States,  will  arrive  next 
Tuesday  the  13th  at  Maiquetia  (Airport),  coming  from  Ecuador  to  wind  up  in 
Caracas  his  turbulent  journey  to  the  peoples  of  the  south.  No  other  tourist  has 
aroused  such  strong  feelings :  boos  in  Montevideo,  hisses  in  La  Paz,  rocks  in 
Lima.  Throughout  America  ( i.e..  South  America )  the  citizens  have  said :  "Go 
home,  Mr.  Nixon.' " 


«»  Washington  Daily  News,  May  21,  1958,  p.  2. 

«  AFL-CIO  News,  May  24,  1958. 

»  Washington  Dally  News,  May  21,  1957,  p.  7. 

«•  William  Hlne6,  Washington  Evening  Star,  May  26,  1958,  pp.  Al  and  A4. 

^  William  Hines,  Washington  Evening  Star.  May  27.  1968.  p.  A13. 

^  Robert  T.  Hartmann,  Los  Angeles  Times,  May  13,  1958,  pp.  1,  4. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 


129 


130  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

'On  iMige  6  of  the  same  issue  appeared  a  woodblock"  cartoon  'Nixon's  Itin- 
erary' api^ears  tlie  following  list  of  incidents  alleged  to  have  occurred  during 
Mr.  Nixon's  trip : 

"In  Uruguay  he  was  booed  by  the  students, 

"The  Argentine  Congress  greets  him  with  whistling. 

"The  Paraguayans,   in  spite  of  Stroessner,  hiss  him  in  the  street. 

"  'Go  back  to  Miami,'  the  placards  of  the  Bolivians  say. 

"They  receive  him  in  Lima  with  the  utmost  coldness. 

"And  nothing  better  remains  for  him  to  say  but  'I  have  met  a  regrettable 
lack  of  understanding  in  Latin  America.' 

"And  he  has  not  yet  got  to  Caracas."  " 

UIOT    AT   THE   MAIQUETIA   AIKPOKT 

Mr.  Nixon's  plane  from  Bogota  arrived  at  10  :58  a.m.  at  the  Maiquetia  Air- 
port. Waiting  to  receive  him  was  a  group  of  high  school  students  carrying 
banners  with  the  identical  slogans  previously  blazoned  by  the  Communist 
weekly,  Tribuna  Popular,  such  as:  "Fuera  Nixon" — "Nixon  Go  Home" — 
"Yanqui  Imperialismo  No" ;  "Tricky  Dick,  go  home."  The  group  seemed  to  be 
under  the  control  of  an  adult. 

Writing  in  the  Washington  Evening  Star  of  May  25,  1958,  William  Hines, 
who  conducted  an  intensive  investigation  in  Caracas,  described  what  occurred 
at  the  airport : 

"A  stairway  was  pushed  to  the  plane's  side,  the  door  opened,  and  Mr.  and 
Mrs.  Nixon  emerged. 

"The  crowd  began  to  whistle — a  noise  of  derision  in  Venezuela.  Some  of  the 
demonstrators  blew  on  wood-and-rubber  razzberries  *  *  * 

"The  roar  of  the  crowd,  the  whistling,  the  hooting,  and  the  razzberries  con- 
tinued through  both  the  Star  Spangle^  Banner  and  the  Venezuelan  hymn  *  *  * 

"The  howls  of  the  crowd  became  deafening.  Someone  threw  his  razzberry  at 
the  Vice  President.     Others  did  the  same.     Then  the  spitting  began. 

"  'It  was  the  damnedest  thing  I  ever  saw  in  my  life,'  one  witness  recalled. 
'There  was  a  regular  rain  of  spit  coming  down  on  us.'  " 

BED    STORM    OVER    CARACAS 

The  Nixon  motorcade  proceeded  to  the  outskirts  of  the  Caracas  working- 
class  district  to  the  Avenida  Sucre.  There  it  was,  for  some  unexplained  rea- 
son, stalled  in  a  noon-hour  traffic  Jam  composed  of  buses  whose  drivers  are 
affiliated  to  a  Communist-dominated  union.  Riding  a  stake  truck  ahead  of  the 
motorcade,  Robert  T.  Hartmann,  Washington  bureau  chief  of  the  Los  Angeles 
Times,  observed  the  following : 

"Wild  with  anti-American  fury  a  mob  of  several  hundred  youths  led  by  older 
men  charged  the  closed  Cadillac  limousine  and  shattered  all  but  two  windows, 
dented  the  body,  and  tried  to  open  the  door  and  pull  Nixon  out  *  *  *. 

"The  rioters  bombarded  the  Nixon  car  with  heavy  rocks,  jagged  cans,  eggs 
and  tomatoes,  and  beat  the  windows  to  smithereens  with  clubs."  ^° 

It  was  clearly  evident  that  the  traffic  jam  was  not  accidental  but  premedi- 
tated. "It  was  no  accident,"  later  declared  the  Vice  President.  "There  were 
two  trucks.  They  collided  and  the  drivers  just  walked  away."  The  mob  had 
been  organized  well  in  advance. 

According  to  the  findings  of  William  Hines  : 

"This  time  the  mob  went  wild.  Screaming,  beating  on  the  halted  lead  car 
with  sticks,  pieces  of  scrap  iron,  and  brickbats,  howling  *  *  *  foul  imprecations, 
spittjng,  throwing  rocks,  the  bravos  tried  to  get  into  the  Nixon  car."  ^ 

Tte  next  scheduled  stop  was  the  Panteon,  the  resting  place  of  the  Venezuelan 
liberator  Simon  Bolivar.  Again  the  organized  crowd  of  demonstrators  was  pre- 
pared. The  street  was  packed  with  banner-carrying  youngsters  of  from  13  to  23 
years  of  age,  looking  for  trouble.  The  Vice  President  decided  to  abandon  the 
Panteon  appearance.  When  his  military  aids  arrived  there,  however,  not  know- 
ing of  the  change  of  plans,  this  is  what  they  found  according  to  Mr,  Hines : 

"The  place  was  a  shambles.  The  supposed  patriots — guarding  the  sacred 
tomb  from  the  "yanqui"  enemy — had  run  wild.    They  had  hoisted  a  black  flag  of 

^  "A   Review  of  tbe  Relations  of  the  United  States  and  Other  American  Republics," 
hearings  before  the  House  Subcommittee  on  Inter-American  Affairs.  June-Julv  1958.  D.  132. 
2»  I.os  Angeles  Times,  May  14,  1958,  p.  1. 
«>  Washington  Star,  May  25,  1958. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH    THE    CARIBBEAN 


131 


132  COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

mourning.    They  had  draped  anti-American  slogans  across  its  frout    They  had 
befouled  its  steps  with  garbage."" 

The  picture  is  amplified  by  Robert  T.  Hartmann,  of  the  Los  Angeles  Times : 
"Meanwhile,  at  the  Panteon,  agitators  had  worked  the  crowd  to  fever  pitch. 
Waiting  Nixon,  they  began  abusing  the  soldiers  stationed  there,  peppering  them 
with  stones  and  sticks.  Assistant  U.S.  Naval  Attach^  Louis  Scleris  was  pum- 
meled  and  kicked  when  he  brought  the  wreath  Nixon  was  to  lay,  and  had  to  be 
escorted  from  the  square  between  bayoneted  ranks  of  soldiers.  The  mob  tore 
the  wreath  to  shreds. 

"  'If  he  [Nixon]  had  gone  in  there,  he'd  never  have  come  out  alive,'  an  Ameri- 
can eyewitness  asserted."  ^ 

THE   COMMUNIST   PARTY   OF   VENEZUELA 

The  basic  policy  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Venezuela  is  primarily  that  of 
latching  itself  on  to  nationalist  movements,  penetrating  and  manipulating  them 
to  its  own  advantage,  in  line  with  the  current  international  policy  of  Moscow. 
Tribuna  Popular  has  declared  that  "without  the  Communist  Party  there  can  be 
no  united  front."  The  party  claims  12,000  members  and  14,000  student 
auxiliaries.  Through  a  powerful  underground  organization,  through  its  inner 
discipline  and  cunning,  this  tiny  minority  operating  in  a  highly  explosive 
atmoisphere  is  in  a  position  to  mobilize  forces  far  beyond  its  numerical  strength. 

The  Communist  Party,  U.S.A.,  is  the  senior  party  in  the  Western  Hemisphere, 
maintaining  supervisory  authority  over  other  Communist  Parties  of  the  area.  It 
is  significant  that  the  Worker  of  February  24,  1952,  official  organ  of  the  CPUSA, 
has  devoted  considerable  attention  to  the  Communist  Party  of  Venezuela.  Re- 
garding its   united   front   with   other  groups,   the  Worker   declared : 

"In  the  political  field  the  trend  toward  unity  between  the  Communist  Party 
and  the  country's  largest  political  party,  Democratic  Action  *  *  *  has  been 
greatly  accelerated.  *  *  *  The  influence  of  the  wing  that  favors  a  united  front 
with  the  Communists  is  growing.  *  *  *  This  wing  includes  Andres  Eloy  Blanco, 
former  Foreign  Minister  and  Venezuela's  leading  poet." 

The  Worker  described  the  strength  of  the  Communist  press  in  Venezuela : 

"When  the  party  was  legal  it  had  one  daily  paper,  Tribuna  Popular,  with  a 
circulation  of  about  12,000.  Today  the  party  publishes  illegally  4  printed 
weeklies  and  about  25  mimeographed  papers  in  various  parts  of  the  country. 
Tribuna  Popular  has  a  circulation  of  12,000-15,000  copies.  Since  each  copy  is 
passed  around,  the  actual  number  of  readers  is  much  larger." 

The  Worker  paints  a  glowing  eulogy  of  Eduardo  and  Gustavo  Machado,  the 
two  outstanding  leaders  of  the  CPV,  from  the  time  they  were  students : 

After  a  visit  to  the  Soviet  Union,  Gustavo  went  to  live  in  Mexico  ♦  ♦  *. 
Meanwhile,  Eduardo  had  gone  to  the  United  States  to  work  with  the  Anti- 
Imperialist  League."  He  was  twice  deported,  but  managed  to  spend  several 
years  in  the  United  States.  There  he  married  Gertrude  Allison,  daughter  of 
Alfred  Wagenknecht,  one  of  the  founders  of  the  U.S.  Communist  Party. 

"After  being  deported  for  the  second  time,  Eduardo  and  his  wife  went  to  the 
Soviet  Union,  where  he  worked  and  studied  for  several  years,  specializing  in 
political  economy." 

It  would  seem  from  the  Worker  account  that  Gustavo  Machado  had  consider- 
able military  experience,  after  his  return  from  the  Soviet  Union : 

"♦  *  *  the  elder  [Gustavo]  joined  the  Sandino  forces  in  the  jungles  of  Nica- 
ragua *  *  *.  In  1929  he  became  a  member  of  a  group  of  250  men  off  the 
northern  coast  of  Venezuela,  invaded  Venezuela  in  an  effort  to  overthrow  the 
Gomez  dictatorship. 

"For  4  months  they  waged  guerrilla  warfare  against  superior  forces.  After 
their  defeat  Gustavo  went  to  Colombia,  from  where  he  helped  organize  the  Com- 
munist Party  of  Venezuela  ♦  *  *.  In  1937  he  was  expelled  [from  Venezuela] 
for  activity  in  connection  with  the  oil  strike.  He  returned  to  Colombia,  where 
Eduardo  also  had  gone." 

Washington  Star  reporter,  William  Hines,  interviewed  Gustavo  Machado  on 
May  19,  1958,  with  reference  to  proposed  changes  in  the  Venezuelan  Cabinet 
subsequent  to  the  resignation  of  two  juntists  who  withdrew  in  protest  against 
the  Government  inefficiency  displayed  in  the  Nixon  affair.     Mr.  Machado  demon- 

»Ibld. 

«*Lo9  Angeles  Times,  May  26,  1958. 

•»  Cited  as  subversive  by  Attorney  General  Francis  Blddle  In  "R«  Harry  Bridges,"  May  28, 
1042,  p.  10. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 


133 


66492   O  -61  -  8 


134  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH    THE    CARIBBEAN 

strated  tlie  degree  to  which  his  party  had  penetrated  and  intervened  in  the 
affairs  of  the  ruling  junta.  He  told  Mr.  Hines  that  his  personal  choices  for 
the  junta  were  Rene  de  Sola,  Minister  of  Justice ;  Julio  de  Armas,  Minister  of 
Education ;  and  Numa  Quevedo,  Minister  of  the  Interior  and  head  of  the  Vene- 
zuela police  organization.  Mr.  Hines  added  the  following  comment :  "The  left- 
wing  nature  of  these  men's  views  and  the  jobs  they  held  made  them  fit  nicely 
with  Communist  plans  for  further  confusion."  ^' 

Despite  the  fact  that  the  Communists  publicly  and  consistently  disclaimed 
responsibility  for  the  violent  outrages  which  occurred,  the  Tribuna  Popular 
declared :  "At  12 :30  it  was  announced  that  the  demonstrators  had  won  a  victory : 
the  footsteps  of  Nixon  would  not  defile  the  sacred  precincts  where  repose  the 
ashes  of  the  liberator." 

COMMUNISTS    CAPITAXIZE    ON    BIOTS 

In  its  manipulation  and  exploitation  of  mobs,  the  Communist  Party  of 
Venezuela  kept  keenly  in  mind  certain  central  aims  which  it  sought  to  realize. 
On  May  17,  Tribuna  Popular  published  a  chronological  list  of  152  years  of  al- 
leged crimes  of  American  imperialism. 

The  political  bureau  of  the  Central  Committee  of  the  Communist  Party  of 
Venezuela,  with  customary  guile  and  in  the  face  of  the  facts,  categorically  con- 
demned "the  fib  sent  from  Washington  both  with  regard  to  a  possible  attempt 
against  the  life  of  Mr.  Nixon,  as  well  as  the  use  of  violence  against  him  per- 
sonally and  his  party."  It  considered  the  statements  made  by  Mr.  Nixon  to  the 
press  "accusing  the  Venezuelan  Communist  Party,  as  an  open  interference  in 
our  internal  affairs." 

Although  disclaiming  responsibility  for  the  Caracas  outrage,  the  Politbureau 
hailed  the  spectacle  at  Maiquetia  Airport  and  in  Caracas  proper,  claiming  that 
"the  student  masses  and  the  people  in  general  were  expressing  their  just  objec- 
tion." 

The  Politbureau  further  branded  Mr.  Nixon's  trip  to  Venezuela  as  "a  decided 
provocation  against  the  patriotic  sentiment  of  the  Venezuelan  people."  The  paper 
held  the  demonstration  to  have  been  "a  legitimate  expression  of  the  national 
feeling  of  repudiation  of  the  voracious  North  American  foreign  policy." 

The  paper  further  condoned  the  rioting  by  declaring: 

"By  means  of  the  press  and  radio  and  through  the  intellectuals,  political  par- 
ties, student  organizations,  etc.,  all  Venezuela  made  obvious  for  several  consecu- 
tive days  her  displeasure  at  Mr.  Nixon's  visit  *  *  *  We  do  not  hesitate  in  af- 
filiating ourselves  with  that  great  march  of  the  students  and  people  *  *  *." 

The  Communists  employed  the  timeworn  device  of  blaming  the  other  fellow 
when  the  Tribuna  Popular  ascribed  responsibility  to  the  reactionaries  "so  that 
they  can  later  blame  the  Communists  and  adherents  of  other  ideologies."  ^ 

After  the  Caracas  riots,  there  were  12  broadcasts  from  Peking  in  Communist 
China.  Five  commentaries  in  Spanish  were  beamed  to  South  America.  There 
were  three  in  the  Chinese  home  service,  four  to  southeast  Asia,  three  to  North 
Ajnerica,  and  one  to  the  Middle  East. 

It  should  be  noted  that  the  Communist  Party  of  Venezuela  was  officially  rep- 
resented at  the  21st  Congress  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  Soviet  Union  held 
in  Moscow  in  January  1959  by  the  following  leading  members :  Jesus  Faria, 
Pompeyo  Marquez,  Pedro  Ortega  Diaz,  Alonso  Ojeda  Oleachea,  and  Guillermo 
Guardin  and  was  also  represented  by  Alvaro  Vasquez  del  Real  at  the  meeting  of 
the  Communist  and  Workers  Parties  held  in  Moscow,  November  14  to  16,  1957, 
at  which  a  special  commission  was  appointed  to  deal  with  Latin  American  ques- 
tions. It  was  also  represented  at  the  Sixth  Congress  of  the  Communist  Interna- 
tional held  in  Moscow  in  the  summer  of  1928.  The  Communist  Party  of  Vene- 
zuela polled  160,719  votes,  or  6.2  percent  of  the  total  in  December  1958. 

TURMOIL  IN  BOLIVIA 

On  December  27,  1952,  the  secretariat  of  the  Central  Committee  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  of  Bolivia  made  known  its  objectives  and  plans,  which  were  pub- 
lished in  LaN&cion,  organ  of  the  Bolivian  Government.  It  hailed  the  military 
coup  of  April  9,  1953,  as  "a  genuine  people's  uprising"  aimed  "to  stop  Bolivia 
from  being  a  tool  of  the  Yankee  warmongers."  "The  taking  up  of  arms  by  the 
people  and  their  victory  over  the  armed  forces  of  the  proimperialist  Rosea  (group 
dominating  the  tin  industry)"  the  party  declared,  "are  of  undeniable  historic  sig- 

»  Washington  Star,  May  29,  1&58. 
«  Tribuna  Popular,  May  17,  lSi58. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  135 

nificance."  It  demanded  recognition  of  "the  urgent  need  of  giving  more  arms 
to  the  workers  and  peasants."  The  document  recommended  the  "organization 
of  a  people's  militia  controlled  and  led  by  the  workers'  and  peasants'  trade 
unions."  The  Bolivian  Federation  of  Labor  is  an  affiliate  of  the  Communist- 
controlletl  World  Federation  of  Trade  Unions.  Significantly,  the  secretariat  de- 
clared that  the  Communist  Party  "took  an  active  and  outstanding  part"  in  "the 
victorious  uprising  of  April  9"  together  with  the  active  members  of  the  National 
Revolutionary  Movement.  It  held  out  the  hope  that  "if  the  Bolivian  Revolu- 
tion fulfills  the  people's  aspirations  for  peace,  liberty,  and  well-being,  it  will  oc- 
cupy an  honorable  place  alongside  the  Chinese  Revolution,  and  the  revolutions 
in  the  People's  Democracies."  It  called  for  the  "denunciation  and  abrogation 
of  *  *  *  the  war  treaties  imposed  by  North  American  imperialism  at  the  Con- 
ferences of  Bogota,  Rio  de  Janeiro,  and  Washington;  expulsion  of  the  U.S. 
military  mission."  In  addition  to  demanding  the  "establishment  of  diplomatic 
and  trade  relations  with  the  Soviet  Union,  the  People's  Republic  of  China,  and 
the  People's  Democracies,"  the  document  called  for  "taking  Bolivia  out  of  the 
war  camp  and  into  the  camp  of  peace,"  which  is  the  Communist  way  of  advocat- 
ing the  severance  of  any  alliance  with  the  United  States  and  the  establishment 
of  a  military  rapprochement  with  the  Soviet  Union.** 

In  its  March  2,  1959,  Latin  American  issue  of  Time  magazine,  an  unidenti- 
fied member  of  the  American  Embassy  at  La  Paz  was  quoted  as  saying  that  "The 
only  solution  to  the  Bolivian  problem  is  to  abolish  Bolivia  and  let  the  neighbors 
divide  the  country  and  solve  the  problem."  Although  this  stupid  and  tactless 
remark  was  immediately  repudiated  by  the  U.S.  State  Department,  it  was  eagerly 
seized  upon  to  light  the  spark  for  3  days  of  anti-American  violence. 

The  day  after  the  670  copies  of  Time  arrived  in  La  Paz  and  were  placed  in  the 
hands  of  its  local  agent,  he  was  waylaid  by  members  of  the  Communist-supported. 
National  Revolutionary  Movement  Youth,  and  all  copies  were  stolen.  Two  days 
later  all  La  Paz  papers  featured  the  story  including  La  Nacion,  oflScial  Govern- 
ment newspaper,  with  the  headline  "Time,  the  Fingernail  of  Imperialism's  Vile 
Claw,  Offends  Bolivia."    The  incendiary  note  was  unmistakable. 


La  Paz  teenagers  and  "May  the  Yankees  Die"  sign.      When  the  President  called, 

they  answered. 

Time  magazine,  March  16,  1959. 

On  the  morning  of  March  2,  2,000  high-school  students  appeared  out  of  no- 
where, fully  organized  and  equipped  with  banners  such  as:  "May  the  Yankees 
Die."  Identified  among  them  were  Trotskyites  and  Communists.  They  shouted, 
"Down  with  American  imperialism"  and  "We  don't  want  to  be  colonized  by  the 
Yankees."    A  large  banner  demanded  the  establishment  of  diplomatic  relations 

»  "What  Must  Be  Done  in  Bolivia,"  by  the  secretariat,  Central  Committee,  Communist 
Party  of  Bolivia,  in  Political  Affairs,  August  1953,  pp.  29-36. 


136  COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

with   the    U.S.S.R.     Another  poster   legended   "Bolivians,   Careful !,"  depicted 
Uncle  Sam  about  to  carve  up  the  country. 

Some  of  the  young  men  belonging  to  the  youth  section  of  the  National  Revolu- 
tionary Movement  were  armed  with  rifles,  and  shots  were  fired  into  the  air.  They 
broke  through  police  lines  guarding  the  American  Embassy.  A  15-year-old  stu- 
dent, Julio  Mendoza,  was  shot  to  death.    This  added  fuel  to  the  raging  flames. 

The  crowd  burned  the  American  flag  and  stoned  the  U.S.  Embassy  and  the 
U.S.  Information  OflSce.  They  tore  the  U.S.  coat  of  arms  from  the  building, 
spat  upon  it,  and  kicked  it  along  the  street.  They  broke  large  windows  and  forced 
their  way  into  the  library,  destroying  books  and  magazines.  A  jeep  parked  in 
front  was  overturned  and  the  mob  tried  to  burn  it. 

After  the  shooting  of  Student  Julio  Mendoza,  Bolivian  President  Hernan  Siles 
Zuazo  crossed  police  lines  to  the  headquarters  of  the  National  Revolutionary 
Movemient,  accompanied  by  Vice  President  Federico  Alvarez  and  other  oflScials. 
He  addressed  the  throng  from  a  balcony,  urging:  "Don't  make  the  situation 
more  acute  with  acts  of  violence.  Shouts  do  not  solve  anything."  But  rioters 
ignored  his  words  and  followed  their  leaders  to  stone  the  point  4  office  and  smash 
25  heavy  trucks  and  pickups  of  the  United  States-Bolivian  Roads  Service. 

On  March  3,  the  staff  of  the  U.S.  Embassy  was  moved  to  the  outskirts  of  La 
Paz  for  better  protection  from  Bolivian  military  and  police  forces  and  for  evacu- 
ation by  plane.  Again  President  Siles  addressed  the  crowd  of  25,000  from  his 
palace  balcony.  Again  his  plea  for  calm  was  disobeyed.  Led  by  Trotskyite 
Leader  Victor  Villegas,  200  demonstrators  stormed  police  guarding  the  American 
Embassy.     At  Cochabamba,  the  USIS  Library  was  gutted. 

The  incitement  of  mob  violence  against  the  United  States  is  all  the  more 
inexcusable  in  the  light  of  the  $129  million  in  U.S.  grants  in  the  past  6  years, 
the  U.S.  food  shipments  which  prevented  grave  distress,  and  the  stabilization 
program  which  strengthened  Bolivian  currency  and  economy.  On  the  other 
hand,  the  Bolivian  Government  protested  in  October  1958  against  Soviet  dumping 
of  huge  tin  reserves  on  the  world  market,  thus  depressing  prices  and  deepening 
Bolivia's  economic  problems." 

In  a  note  addres.sed  thereafter  to  U.S.  Charge  d'Affaires  at  La  Paz,  Mr. 
Wymbeiiey  DeR.  Coerr,  Foreign  Minister  of  Bolivia,  by  Victor  Andrade,  the 
latter  stated  that  the  acts  of  violence  which  followed  the  publication  of  the  Time 
article  were  the  result  of  agitation  by  a  small  minority  of  extremists  influenced 
by  international  communism  carried  out  with  the  intent  of  damaging  the  tradi- 
tional friendship  between  the  peoples  and  Governments  of  Bolivia  and  the 
United  States.^' 

The  international  Communist  apparatus  was  quick  to  capitalize  upon  the  La 
Paz  events.  Typical  was  the  broadcast  of  March  5  from  Communist  China, 
which  hailed  "The  big  anti-U.S.  demonstration  in  the  Bolivian  capital  of  La 
Paz"  as  showing  that  "the  Latin  American  people  are  not  to  be  insulted." 

Commenting  upon  the  "mass  anti-American  demonstration  in  La  Paz,"  the 
Moscow  Pravda  of  March  6,  1959,  page  6,  described  "the  true  meaning  of  the 
American  colonial  policy  toward  Bolivia"  as  "a  policy  for  the  further  enslave- 
ment of  the  Bolivian  people  and  the  destruction  of  the  freedoms  that  they  have 
won." 

It  should  be  noted  that  the  Communist  Party  of  Bolivia  was  oflBcially  repre- 
sented at  the  21st  Congress  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  Soviet  Union  held 
in  Moscow  in  January  1959  by  its  secretary-general,  Luis  Angel  Telleria  and 
Humberto  Ramirez  Cardenas,  and  was  also  represented  at  the  meeting  of  the 
Communist  and  Workers  Parties  held  in  Moscow,  November  14  to  16,  1957,  at 
which  a  special  commission  was  appointed  to  deal  with  Latin  American  questions. 
The  Communist  Party  of  Bolivia  polled  6,913  votes  or  1.4  percent  of  the  total  in 
July  1958. 

Riot  Instbuctions 

We  have  shown  above  that  the  Communist  Parties  of  Colombia,  Venezuela,  and 
Bolivia  have  been  in  intimate  contact  with  their  mentors  in  Moscow.  Former 
Communist  leaders  of  various  countries  have  testified  regarding  Soviet  instruc- 
tion to  representatives  of  international  Communist  Parties,  notably  Eudocio 
Ravines  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Chile  in  his  book  "The  Yenan  Way" 
(Scribners),  Valentin  Gonzales  (El  Campesino)  together  with  Julian  Gorkin  of 
the  Communist  Party  of  Spain,  in  "Life  and  Death  in  Soviet  Russia"  (Putnam), 
and  Wolfgang  Leonhard  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Germany  in  his  "Child  of 

"  Time,  Mar.  16,  1959,  pp.  40,  42 ;  Newsweek,  Mar.  16,  1959,  pp.  48,  53^ ;  New  York  Times, 
Mar.  3,  lft59,  p.  8.     Also.  Christian  Science  Monitor,  Mar.  3.  1959,  p.  5. 
as  U.S.  Department  of  State  Bulletin,  Mar.  30,  1959i,  p.  4^6. 


COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  137 

the  Revolution"  (Regnery)  and  Benjamin  Gitlow,  former  member  of  the  political 
committee  of  the  Communist  Party,  USA,  and  its  candidate  for  Vice  President, 
who  testified  before  the  Special  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  on 
September  8, 1939,  as  follows  : 

"In  addition  to  that,  the  Communist  International  has  established  a  number 
of  colleges  for  the  purpose  of  training  professional  revolutionists.  In  other 
words,  the  Communist  International  is  very  much  interested  in  developing 
professional  revolutionists,  people  who  would  devote  all  their  time  to  the  Com- 
munist cause  and  to  the  Communist  organization,  and  for  that  purpose  they 
created  in  Moscow  a  number  of  schools  and  universities  and  to  these  schools 
and  universities  we  sent  students.  The  American  party  sends  these  students 
over  to  Moscow,  to  the  highest  schools,  and  the  schools  to  which  only  the  most 
promising  members  of  the  party  were  sent,  and  the  school  to  which  even 
leaders  of  the  party  were  sent  is  known  as  the  Lenin  Institute,  and  the  allot- 
ment to  the  Lenin  Institute  in  recent  years,  when  I  was  the  top  leader  of  the 
party  we  sent  around  20  students  to  the  Lenin  Institute,  and  they  took  up  a 
3-year  course  in  the  Lenin  Institute  on  all  matters  of  Communist  strategy  and 
policy  and  everything  required  of  a  Communist  leader. 

•  •****• 
"Then  they  had  a  Far  Eastern  University.     The  Far  Eastern  University  was 

the  university  of  which  Joseph  Stalin  was  particularly  proud,  and  to  that  uni- 
versity the  Communist  Parties  were  supposed  to  send  those  members  who  were 
interested  in  becoming  active  in  the  Far  East  and  among  the  colonial  people 
of  the  world,  and  we  sent  about  30  to  the  Far  Eastern  University,  and  among 
them  was  a  large  percentage,  I  would  say  more  than  half,  Negroes,  members  of 
the  party.  So  we  could  train  them  or  they  could  be  trained  to  be  active  in  the 
colonial  uprisings  if  they  would  take  place  in  Africa  and  in  other  places. 

•  *••**• 
"Mr.  Whitlet.  I  believe  that  in  the  past  the  statement  or  the  allegation  has 

been  made  that  they  taught  such  courses  as  street  fighting,  and  how  to  stir  up 
political  strife  and  disorders,  and  also  gave  the  students  at  the  institute  mili- 
tary training  under  the  oflBcial  trainers  of  the  Red  army.  Do  you  know  whether 
that  is  correct  or  not? 

"Mr.  GiTLOW.  They  got  a  course  in  military  training.  They  formed  a  special 
section  of  the  military  in  Moscow.  They  paraded  during  May  Day,  carrying  the 
rifles  that  they  practiced  with ;  that  is  true."  ** 

From  within  the  Communist  Party,  U.S.A.,  various  former  graduates  of  the 
Lenin  School  have  testified  as  to  its  curriculum,  notably  Joseph  Kornfeder, 
Charles  White,  Leonard  Patterson,  supporting  and  corroborating  the  testimony 
of  William  Odell  Nowell,  a  former  member  of  the  Detroit  district  committee 
of  the  CPUSA,  and  a  delegate  to  its  seventh  national  convention.  He  testi- 
fied to  the  Special  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  on  November  30,  1939 
with  regard  to  instructions  he  had  received  at  the  Lenin  School  in  1931  with 
special  reference  to  the  manipulation  of  mobs  and  riot  techniques : 

"Mr.  Whitlet.  Were  you  sent  to  Russia  during  1931,  Mr.  Nowell? 

"Mr.  Nowell.  I  was. 

"Mr.  Whitley.  For  what  purpose? 

"Mr.  Nowell.  I  was  sent  as  a  student  to  the  International  Lenin  Uni- 
versity. 

"Mr.  Whitley.  Where  is  that  located? 

"Mr.  Nowell.  It  is  located  in  Moscow. 

"Mr.  Whitley.  Who  sent  you  there? 

"Mr.  Nowell.  The  Central  Committee  of  the  Communist  Party. 

"Mr.  Whitley,  Of  the  United  States? 

"Mr.  Nowell.  Of  the  United  States. 

"Mr.  Whitley.  For  how  long  did  you  remain  there? 

"Mr.  Nowell.  I  remained  there  from  September  1931  up  to  December  1932. 

"Mr.  W^hitley.  Approximately  2  years? 

"Mr.  Nowell.  Approximately  2  years ;  at  least  18  months. 

"Mr.  Whitley.  And  who  paid  your  expenses,  both  your  traveling  expenses 
and  your  living  expenses,  while  you  were  in  Moscow  ? 

"Mr.  Nowell.  My  traveling  expenses  were  paid  by  the  Central  Committee 
of  the  Communist  Party ;  my  living  expenses  were  paid  by  the  Communist 
International  and  the  Russian  Government,  while  there  in  school. 


»»  Hearings,  Special  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  vol.  7,  September  1830,  pp. 
4593,  4594. 


138  COMMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

"Mr.  Whitley.  Were  there  other  American  students  in  the  Lenin  School  or 
University  in  Moscow  with  youV 

"Mr.  NowELL.  There  were ;  approximately  30. 

"Mr.  Whitley.  What  was  the  nature  of  the  studies  or  instruction  that  you 
received  in  the  Lenin  University? 

"Mr.  NowELL.  Our  theoretical  studies  consisted  of  Marxian  economics ;  Len- 
inism, which  is  called  philosophy  there ;  trade  unionism,  that  is,  trade-union 
strike  strategy ;  labor  history ;  the  history  of  tlie  two  internationals ;  the  history 
of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  So\iet  Union.  Our  other  studies  were  military 
science.  We  studied  how  to  dismantle  the  weapons  of  the  leading  countries, 
that  is,  their  main  weapons,  such  as  rifles  or  machinegtms  and  so  on.  I  also 
studied  secret  service,  codes.  We  studied  strategy,  beginning  with  the  organiza- 
tion of  a  fraction — a  shop  fraction — clear  up  to  the  control  of  a  trade  union,  or 
mass  organization,  and  developed  the  political  parallel  along  with  it.  That  is, 
the  ideological  development  of  the  people  under  the  influence  of  these  fractions, 
and  when  a  certain  strategy  applies  at  a  certain  time,  and  how  to  change  that 
consequent  upon  the  development  of  the  political  understanding  of  a  person  and 
lead  him  up  to  the  higher  stage,  and  eventually  using  all  of  these  developments 
that  we  were  going  to  consciously  carry  out,  to  make  a  revolution.  So  hence  we 
studied  the  details  of  how  to  develop  street  fights.  I  mean,  how  to  do  barricade 
fighting,  how  to  seize  control  of  a  city,  the  most  strategic,  economically,  and 
technically  strategic  points,  and  so  on. 

******  ^ 

"Mr.  NowELL  *  *  *  We  studied  the  strategy  of  what  we  called  the  proletarian 
uprising.  In  other  words,  the  science  of  civil  warfare  was  developed  down  to 
its  fine  points.  And  a  number  of  people  were  sent  to  the  Red  army  to  secure 
further  training  in  this  respect. 

"Mr.  Whitley.  A  number  of  American  students? 

"Mr.  No  WELL.  Yes.  In  fact,  I  spent  some  time  in  the  Red  army  myself,  but 
I  was  just  making  a  practical  study  of  the  army,  and  doing  international  propa- 
ganda work ;  that  is,  lecturing  and  so  on. 

"I  was  sent  there  for  a  while  to  make  a  practical  study  of  the  organization 
of  the  army,  the  tactics,  the  methods,  and  so  on,  corresponding  to  the  instruc- 
tions we  had  been  given.     These  studies  we  had  been  given  by  a  Red  army 
commander  who  was  an  attach^  from  the  Red  army  of  the  Lenin  University. 
******* 

"Mr.  VooRHis.  Do  you  know  what  happened  to  any  of  the  other  people  that 
were  there  when  you  were  there?  Do  you  know  where  any  of  them  went,  what 
they  have  done? 

"Mr.  NowELL.  Morris  Childs,""  who  went  under  the  alias  of  Summers  there, 
I  last  heard  of  him,  and  according  to  newspaper  reports,  he  is  the  district  sec- 
retary of  the  Communist  Party  of  Chicago;  *  *  * 

******* 

"Mr.  Starnes.  In  the  school  you  attended,  you  stated,  they  taught  you  revo- 
lutionary methods,  and  that  some  of  you  were  trained  in  the  Russian  Army. 
Will  you  get  down  to  detail  as  to  what  type  of  training  was  given  you?  Was  it 
strictly  military  training  or  specialized  training  of  some  sort  in  the  use  of 
certain  weapons  and  certain  tactics? 

"Mr.  NowELL.  We  were  given  regular  military  training.  That  is,  we  studied 
military  science,  strategy,  such  as  is  general  in  almost  all  countries.  The 
strategy  is  pretty  much  the  same,  except  in  countries  of  difl'erent  geographical 
situations,  and  so  on.  We  had  target  practice  and  all  that.  Then  we  were 
taught  what  is  called  partisan  warfare,  the  science  of  civil  warfare,  revolu- 
tionary uprising.  It  is  not  done  legitimately  and  openly.  You  don't  march  in 
brigades  and  fight  like  armies  that  are  meeting  each  other 

"Mr.  Starnes.  I  want  you  to  bring  out  that  factor. 

"Mr.  NowEiX.  The  conspiratory  type  of  warfare.  It  is  related  to  the  boring- 
in  process,  street  fighting,  and  how  to  mobile  in  blocks,  in  a  city,  the  workers  in 
a  plant:  how  to  develop  a  general  strike  out  of  a  local  strike;  how  to  develop 
a  general  strike  into  a  city  uprising,  a  dty  uprising  into  a  national  uprising, 
coordinating  all  these  different  uprisings.  Then  how  to  lead  this  thing,  once  it 
is  raised,  once  these  men  are  on  the  warpath,  how  to  direct  them.  Then  we 
come  to  something  like  open  warfare.    We  break  these  people  down  into  groups  ; 

*>  Miorris  Childs  attended  the  21st  Congress  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  Soviet  Unioa 
In  January  1959.     In  recent  years  he  has  been  active  in  Latin  America. 


COJVIMUNIST    THREAT    THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN  139 

we  make  armies  on  the  basis  of  the  immediate  emergency  of  the  moment,  or 
whatever  the  situation  may  be.  We  were  given  to  know  that  in  a  revolutionary 
situation  you  cannot  follow  out  mechanically  any  particular  plan,  only  your 
objective.  It  is  a  tense  situation.  Therefore  a  party  having  an  organization, 
with  its  fingers  on  everything — e\'ery  portion  of  the  city  and  its  population,  that 
it  can  depend  on — is  prepared  to  direct  all  its  forces  in  the  way  they  should  be. 

"Mr.  Starnes.  Were  you  taught  to  concentrate  particularly  on  utilities,  and 
munitions  plants,  or  anything  to  that  effect? 

"Mr.  NowELL.  The  food  supply,  the  warehouses,  the  utilities,  that  is  water 
and  lights,  gas,  and  all  those  things ;  the  communications,  that  is  the  railways 
entering  the  city,  the  streetcar  service,  telephone  service,  and  telegraph ;  and  all 
those  things. 

"Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words,  that  is  communications.  You  were  talking 
figuratively  a  few  moments  ago  when  you  mentioned  'utilities.' 

"Mr.  NowELL.  Yes. 

"Mr.  Starnes.  Were  you  given  any  instructions  in  sabotage? 

"Mr.  Nowell.  Sabotage;  how  to  wreck  trains,  at  this  point  closing  down 
factories,  facilitating  discontent  to  raise  the  mob  spirit  in  order  to  get  the 
men  on  the  go,  and  various  other  acts  of  sabotage,  which,  of  course,  could  be 
attempted  on  a  moment's  notice.  Also,  the  general  method  of  derailing  a  train 
and  destroying  its  cargo.  I  mean,  if  it  is  going  to  be  available  for  the  enemy, 
just  put  it  full  speed  ahead  when  you  know  there  is  another  train  coming  head-on, 
and  just  step  aside."  " 

Conclusions 

1.  In  some  Latin  American  countries.  Communist  Parties  controlling  an  insig- 
nificant minority  of  the  total  votes  cast,  have  resorted  to  the  policy  of  manipu- 
lating and  inciting  mobs  to  accomplish  political  and  diplomatic  objectives  in  the 
interest  of  Soviet  foreign  policy. 

2.  These  operations  are  directed  primarily  against  the  American  Government, 
to  defeat  its  objectives  and  humiliate  its  spokesmen  and  representatives. 

3.  Latin  American  Communists  succeeded  in  seriously  interfering  with  the 
BogotJi  Inter-Amercian  Conference.  They  subjected  Vice  President  Richard  M. 
Nixon  and  his  wife  to  a  most  humiliating  experience. 

4.  Attacks  are  concentrated  upon  American  property  and  personnel. 

5.  The  American  Government  has  not  in  the  past  successfully  been  properly 
prepared  for  and  prevented  such  occurrences. 

6.  The  resort  to  international  financial  aid,  no  matter  how  generous,  has  not 
of  itself  furnished  an  adequate  preventive  against  anti-American,  Communist- 
inspired  mob  violence. 

7.  Despite  the  numerous  examples  of  worldwide  Communist  imperialism 
and  brutality,  there  have  been  few  cases  of  mob  violence  against  Communist 
embassies  or  agencies. 

8.  For  the  most  part  the  Communists  operate  behind  the  scenes  making  use  of 
uninformed  and  excitable  teenagers,  students,  and  illiterates. 

9.  As  a  rule  the  Communists  wait  for  a  suitable  issue  to  arise  on  the  basis 
of  which  they  can  successfully  provoke  mob  excitement  and  violence.  If  the  issue 
does  not  exist,  they  create  one. 

10.  In  large  measure  the  Communists  exploit  economic  difficulties  and  national- 
ist emotions. 

11.  The  Communists'  standard  practice  is  to  employ  nonmilitary  weapons, 
easily  accessible  to  the  mob,  such  as  stones,  i>oster  sticks,  clubs,  gasoline,  kero- 
sene, homemade  bombs,  etc.  These  have  been  supplemented  by  the  looting  of 
guns  and  ammunition  from  hardware  stores. 

12.  The  techniques  followed  by  the  Communists  parallel  those  taught  in  special 
schools  for  international  Communist  agents  in  the  Soviet  Union. 

13.  By  allying  themselves  with  political  groups  in  power,  the  Communists  have 
succeeded  in  minimizing  police  action  and  interference  against  the  mobs  they 
have  incited. 

14.  Communists  make  adequate  preparations  far  in  advance  for  their  inspired 
riots,  through  provocative  mass  meetings,  leaflets,  broadcasts,  cartoons,  news- 
paper articles,  and  even  assassinations. 

15.  The  Communist  Party  does  not  deplore  bloodshed  in  connection  with  anti- 
American  riots  in  the  belief  that  such  occurrences  tend  to  excite  the  mob  to 
greater  violence. 

"Hearings,  Special  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  vol.  11,  October,  November, 
December,  1939,  pp.  7020,  7021,  7022,  7023,  7025. 


140  COMMUNIST   THREAT   THROUGH   THE    CARIBBEAN 

16.  The  Communists  have  utilized  their  control  of  labor  unions,  to  augment 
the  mobs  operating  under  their  direction. 

17.  Communist-controlled  mobs  have  concentrated  upon  strategic  targets  such 
as  police  stations,  radio  stations,  the  American  Embassy  and  other  American 
agencies,  in  accordance  with  Soviet-inspired  strategy. 

18.  As  a  rule  the  Communists  and  their  Moscow  mentors  have  disclaimed  all 
responsibility  for  mob  violence  in  the  face  of  clear  evidence  to  the  contrary. 

19.  Leaders  of  the  Communist  Parties  of  Colombia,  Venezuela,  and  Bolivia 
have  been  in  Moscow  where  they  have  received  instruction  and  directives,  in- 
cluding the  handling  of  mobs  and  military  techniques. 

20.  The  success  achieved  by  the  Communists  in  manipulating  mobs  for  anti- 
American  incitement  will  encourage  them  to  further  efforts  of  this  kind  on  a 
larger  scale. 


INDEX 


Note. — The  Senate  Internal  Security  Subcommittee  attaches  no  significance 
to  the  mere  fact  of  the  appearance  of  the  name  of  an  individual  or  an  organization 
in  this  index. 

A 

Page 

Abella,  Pedro 123 

Accion  Democratica  (student  organization) 126 

ACFTU    Message    Backs    Cuban    Land    Reform     (English    Morse    to 

Pyongyang,  August  4,  1959) 72 

Achilles,  Theodore  C._ 124 

Acosta,  Maria 61 

Acosta,  Raou 69 

AFI^CIO 117,  128 

Agrarian  reform 51 

Agrarian  Reform  Law  of  Cuba 77-88 

Aguirre,  Comrade  Severa  (People's  Socialist  Party  of  Cuba) 70 

Alberdi,  Paulino  Gonzales 62,  63 

Aleixe V,  Minev 61 

Alexander,  Robert  (author) 40 

Allen,  James  S 41 

Allison,  Gertrude  (Mrs.  Gustavo  Machado) 132 

Alvarez,  Federico  (Bolivian  Vice  President) 136 

Andes 45 

Andrade,  Victor 136 

Andriano  V 124 

Anti-Imperialist  League 132 

Apristas  Party 125 

Aptheker,  Herbert 41,  42 

Argentine/a 36,  68 

Arismendi,  Rodney 58 

Armour,  Norman 122 

Asia 74 

Auerbach 42 

B 

Bachrach,  Marion 41,  42 

Balino,  Carlo 101 

Barera,  Rafael  Azula 121 

Bassett,  Theodore 41 

Batista,  Gen.  Fulgencio,  (ex-President,  Cuba) 90,  93,  95,  99,  108 

Baughman,  E.  E 128 

Beals,  Carleton 98,  99 

Beaulac,  Ambassador  Willard  L 116 

Bequer,  Conrado  (secretary  general,  Federation  of  Sugar  Workers,  Cuba)  _  _         92 

Bert,  Eric 41 

Betancourt,  President  Romulo 43,  61,  62 

Bezrodnik,  Felipe  (Communist  Party,  Argentina) 69 

Bittelman,  Alexander 37,  38,  40-42 

Blanco,  Andres  Elloy 132 

Blest,  Clotanio 61 

Bogota,  Colombia 115-118,  122 

Bolivar,  Simon 128 

Bolivia 68,  124,  134-136,  140 

Bolivian  Federation  of  Labor 135 

BoHvian  Revolution 135 

Borisev___ 124 

I 


n  INDEX 

Page 

Browder,  Earl 40,  106- 

"Browder  and  Latin  America" . 40' 

"Browder  on  Latin  America" 40 

"Browder  and  Mexico" 40 

Buck,  Tim 41 

C 

Caracas.  Venezuela 115,  124,  126,  130,  134 

Cardenas,  Humberto  Ramirez 136 

Caribbean  Bureau 36,  37,  40,  41,  46,  50 

Castro,  Dr.  Fidel  (Cuba's  Premier)  __  61,  71,  75,  76,  90-93,  95-98,  100,  103,  104 

Castro  regime 74 

Central  Intelligence  Agency 115 

Central  University  of  Caracas 126 

Chaves,  Frederico  (President,  Paraguay) 99 

Chiao  Wen-fu___- 70 

"Child  of  the  Revolution"  (by  Wolfgang  Leonhard) 130,  137 

Childs,  Morris 138 

Chile 68,  104,  124 

Chilean  Red  Asks  Ties  With  Castro  (article.  New  York  Times,  May  11, 

1959) 103 

China 35,51 

China  (Communist) 136 

Clagett,  Mrs.  Helen  L.  (Library  of  Congress) 88 

Codovilla,  Victorio 40-42,  65 

Coerr,  Wymberley  DeR 136 

Colombia 44,  45,  116,  118,  119,  121,  123,  132,  136,  140 

Colombian  Federation  of  Labor 116 

(Confederation) 1 123 

Colon,  J 41 

Comintern 40 

"Communism  in  Latin  America" 40 

Communist,  the  (a.k.a.  Political  Affairs) 40 

Communist  international 36,  137 

(Sixth  congress  of  the) 134 

Communist  Party 88 

Of  Bolivia 136 

Of  Brazil 51,  52 

Of  Chile 103,  107,  136 

Of  Colombia 34,  39,  116,  121,  123,  136 

Of  Cuba 73 

Of  Ecuador 107 

Of  Germanv 130 

Of  Soviet  Union 34 

Of  Spain 136 

Of  United  States 34,  40,  42,  98,  132,  136 

Of  Venezuela 34,39,  132,  136 

Central  committee  of  the,  of  Venezuela 134 

Central  committee  of  the,  of  Bolivia 134 

In  South  America  (20  parties) 50,  51 

Mexican 40 

21st  congress  of  the,  of  the  Soviet  Union 123,  134 

Communist  press 48 

Communists  in  Cuba  Pose  a  Big  Problem  (article) 92 

Communists  and  workers  parties  of  the  world 58 

"A  Compilation  of  the  Messages  and  Papers  of  the  Presidents"  (Richard- 
son's)           50 

Confederation  of  Workers  of  Colombia , 121 

Contreras,  Carlos 40 

Corvalan,  Glen 104 

Corvalan,  Luis  (secretary-general,  Communist  Party,  Chile) 69,  103 

CPUSA  Urges  Defense  of  Free  Cuba  (article) 94 

Cuba 51,  52,  74-77,  89-114 

Cuba  Has  a  One-Man  Rule  and  Is  Held  To  Be  Non-Red  (article) 95 

Cuban  Communist  Leader  Answers  the  Question:  What  Is  the  Nature  of 

Cuba's  Revolution?  (article) 89 

Cuban  land  reform 76 


INDEX  m 

Pag© 

Cuban  People  and  the  Batista  Tyranny,  the  (article) 103 

Cuban  PSP  Leader  Hails  CPR's 'Progress  (Peking  radioteletype) 72 

"Cuban  Revolution  and  the  Tasks  of  the  Communist  Party,  U.S.A.,  The" 

(document) 98-103 

"Cuba's  Revolution:  I  Saw  the  People's  Victory" 103 

Cuba  Today  (article) 91 

Cueller,  Diego  Montana 121 

D 

Daily  Worker  (see  also  Worker) 48,  122,  126,  132 

De  Armas,  Julio 134 

Delgado,  Francisco 39 

DelFrado,  Jorge  (CP,  Peru) 69 

Del  Real,  Alvaro  Vasquez 134 

Dennis,  Eugene  (national  secretary,  CPUSA) 94,  106 

De  Sola,  Rene 134 

De  Vore,  Lee - 124,  125 

Diaz,  Galo  Gonzales  (general  secretary.  Communist  Party,  Chile) 104 

Diaz,  Pedro  Ortega 134 

Diaz  Lanz,  Maj.  Pedro  Luis  (former  head,  Cuban  Air  Force) 95 

Dimitrov,  G 66 

Directive  of  CPUSA  re  Cuba 98 

Dorf man,  Carl 41 

Draft  program 52 

"Draft  Program  of  Communist  Party  of  Brazil" 52-54 

Dulles,  John  Foster 73 

Dunn,  Robert  W 41 

Duvaller,  Francois  (President,  Haiti) 99 

E 

Ecuadoran  Communist  Party 107 

Eduardo 132 

Eisenhower- Lopez  Mateos  interview  in  Acapulco 61 

Eisler,  Gerhart 40 

Encina,  Dionisio 41,  42 

Enriquez,  President  Camilo  Ponce  (Ecuador) 107,  108 

Eremev,  Timofei 61 

Estrada,  Pedro  (chief  of  police,  Caracas) 128 

Estrade 128 

Europe 50,  74 

Ewert,  Arthur 40 

F 

Far  Eastern  University 137 

Faria,  Jesus 134 

Federation  of  Petro  Workers  (CTC) 121 

Figueres,  Col.  Jose 93 

Foner,  Philip  S 41 

"For  a  Lasting  Peace  for  a  People's  Democracy"  (Communist  periodical)  _  .  52 

Foster,  William  Z 41,  102-106 

Foster  and  Latin  America  (article) 104 

Front  of  People's  Action  (of  Chile) 57 

Fuenmayor,  Juan  (secretary,  Communist  Party  of  Venezuela) 39 

G 

Gaitan,  Dr.  Jorge  Eliecer 116,  118,  119,  121,  123 

Assassination  of 117 

Germany 35 

Ghioldi,  Rodolfo  (Communist  Party,  Argentina) 63 

Gitlow,  Benj amin 137 

Gomez  dictatorship 132 

Gomez,  Juan  Vincente 44-46 

Gonzales,  Valentin  (El  Campesino) 136 

Gorkin,  Julian 136 

Gorokhoff,  Boris  I.  (Library  of  Congress) 72 

Green,  Gilbert 41 

Guralski 37 


IV  INDEX 

Page 

Guardin,  Guillermo  (Communist  Party,  Venezuela) 69,  134 

G  uerrilla  warfare 75 

H 

Hallet,  Robt.  M 100 

"Hands  off  Cuba!     Solidarity  With  Free  Cuba!"  (statement) 94 

Hartmann,  Robt.  T 130,  132 

Hillenkoetter,  Adm.  R.  H 115,  116 

Hines,  Wm 130,  132,  134 

History  of  the  CPUSA 102,  103 

"Hov"  (Cuban  newspaper) 92,  93 

Hulen,  Bertram  H 122 

Hutchins,  Grace 41 

I 

"I  Accuse"  (statement  by  Alfonso  Sanzhez  Madariaga) 60 

Ibanez,  Bernardo  (President  of  Chile) 117,  118,  124 

Ibarrola  (expelled  Paraguayan  Communist  Party  leader) 65 

Iglesias,  Cesar  Andreu 41,  42 

' ' Imperialisimo  Yanqui" 67 

Information  Bureau  of  Communist  and  Workers  Parties 52 

Inter- American  Confederation  of  Workers 117,  118 

Inter-American  Conference 116,  121,  122 

Ninth 115 

Inter- American  Labor  Bulletin 60 

Inter-American  Labor  News 117 

"International  Communist  Movement  in  Its  New  State"  (article,  October 

1958) _• 55-58 

International  Monetary  Fund 67 

J 

Jackson,  Congressman  Donald  J 117,  121,  122 

Jimenez 57 

Jiminez,  Marcos  Perez  (Venezuela) 99,  128 

K 

Kass,  John  (a.k.a.  Antonio  Mendez,  Joseph  Kornfeder) 67,  68 

Keating,  Senator  Kenneth  B 33 

Key,  Wm..._ 128 

Khrushchev 48,  68 

Komraunist  (periodical) 55 

Kornfeder,  Joseph  Zack 137 

Testimony  of 33-1 1 4 

3210  Book  Tower,  Detroit,  Mich 68 

Born :   Austria-Hungary 33 

Member,   CPUSA;  member  Communist  Party  of  Soviet  Union  for 

3  years 34 

One  of   principal  founders  of  Communist  Parties  of  Colombia  and 

Venezuela 34 

Broke  with  Communist  Party  in  1934 35 

Spent  3  years  in  Lenin  College  in  Moscow 35 

Kremlin 50 

Kubitschek,  President 61 

L 

Laflferte,  Elias  (chairman,  Communist  Party,  Chile) 63 

La  Nacion  (organ  of  the  Bolivian  Government) 134,  135 

Land  distribution 75 

La  Paz,  BoHvia 115,  135,  136 

Lara,  Juan  C 118 

La  Rotunda 45 

Latin  America 34 

Latin  American  Confederation  of  Labor  (CTAL) 116 

"Latin  America  Demands  Browder's  Freedom" 40 

Latin  American  Bureau 36 


INDEX  V 

Page 

Latin  American  Secretariat  in  Moscow 37,  48 

Lenin 48,  51,  63 

Lenin  College 35 

Institute 137,  138 

School 36,  44,  51,  67,  68 

Leonhard,  Wolfgang 136 

Lewis,  John  L 77 

Liberation  Movement  in  Latin  America  (article) 103 

Libert,  O.  J 116 

Library  of  Congress 72,  77,  88 

Li  Li 70 

"Life  and  Death  in  Soviet  Russia" 136 

Little  Rock,  Ark 128 

Liu  Ning-i 72 

"Look  Southward,  Uncle" 34 

Los  Angeles  Times 132 

Lucey,  Charles 126 

M 

Machado 101,  108 

Machado,  Gustavo 132 

Madariaga,  Alfonso  Sanchez 60,  62 

Magliore,  Paul  G.  (Haiti) 99 

Maiquetta  Airport 130 

Mandel,  Benjamin 33 

Manuilsky,  Dmitri 40,  51 

Mao  Tse-tung  (Chinese  Communist  leader) 68,  69,  104 

Mao  Meets  Latin  American  Party  Leaders  (telecast) 69 

Maracaibo 46 

Mariatequi,  Jose  Carlos 63 

Marinello,  Juan  (Cuban  People's  Socialist  Party) 71,  73,  101 

Marquez,  Pompeyo 69,  134 

Marshall,  Gen.  George  C 115,  116,  121-123 

Marti,  Jose  (Cuban  liberator) 101 

Mateos,  President  Lopez 61 

Matthews,  Herbert  L 95,  100 

May  Day 137 

Mella,  Julio  Antonio  (Communist  Party,  Cuba) 63,  101 

Mendez,  Antonio  (a.k.a.  John  Kass) 68 

Mexico 68 

Mil  Diez  (radio  station,  Cuba) 93 

Monroe  Doctrine 48,  49 

Monroe,  James 49 

Montana  Kaimin  (newspaper) 124 

Montevideo 36,  37 

Morena,  Antonio  Garcia 61 

Moreno,  Joaquin  (Communist  Party,  Colombia) 69,  124 

Moscow 35-38,  40,  43,  47,  51,  54,  55,  68,  123,  124,  132,  134,  136-138,  140 

Moscow  Communists 91 

Munoz,  Elias  (Communist  Party,  Ecuador) 69 

N 

National  Institute  of  Agrarian  Reform 77 

National  Radio  of  Colombia 120 

National  Revolutionary  Movement  Youth 135,  136 

N.C.,  Popular  Socialist  Party 108 

New  York 36,  42,  43,  46 

New  York  Times 115,  121,  122,  124,  125 

New  York  Times: 

May  11,  1959 103 

Mav  15,  1959 107 

May  31,  1959 92 

July  16,  1959 95 

Nixon,  Vice  President 67,  124-132,  134 

Nixon's  tour 47 

North,  Joseph 102,  103 

Nowell,  William  Odell 137 


VI  INDEX 

O  ■  Page 

Obrera,  Verdad __  39 

Official  Gazette  of  Havana 77 

Ojeda,  Alonso 69 

Oleachea,  Alonso  Ojeda 134 

On  the  Role  of  the  National  Bourgeoisie  in  the  Anti-Imperialist  Struggle 

(article) 58-60 

Operation  Colombia 68 

Ortega,  Pedro 69 

Outline  History  of  the  Americas 103,  105,  106 

"Outline  of  Political  History  of  the  Americas" 41 

P 

Panama 43 

Panama  Canal 36 

Pan-America,n  Conference  (in  Havana) 40 

Pan  American  Conference.     {See  Inter-American  Conference.) 

Pan  American  Union,  Economic  and  Social  Council  of  the 115 

Pan  American  Week 124 

Panteon,  The 130,  132 

Pareja,  Carlos  Henry 121 

"Partido  Socialista  Revolucionario" 44 

"Patriotic  Junta" 57 

Patterson,  Leonard 137 

Peace  Manifesto 55 

Peiping 68 

Peking 134 

Pena,  lazar 101 

Pena,  Lazaro , 93,  103 

People's  Front  (Brazil) 57 

"The  People's  Front"  (by  Earl  Browder) 40 

People's  Socialist  Party  of  Cuba 73 

Peralta,  Jorge  Regueros 123 

Perez  (Conservative)  government 116 

Perez,  Ospina  (Colombian  President) 117 

Peron,  Gen.  Juan  Domingo  (Argentina  President) 99 

Peru 68,  124 

Phillips,  R.  Hart 92 

Pietroria,  Rosario 61 

Pinilla,  Gustavo  Rojas  (Colombia) 55,  99 

Plantation  system 77 

Politbureau 134 

Political  Affairs  (periodical) 103,  104,  108 

March  1956 104 

June  1959 108 

Ponce,  Serbando  Garcia ■ 128 

Ponomarev,  B 55 

Popular  Socialist  Party 108,  109 

Popular  Socialist  Party,  Cuba 89 

Pravda 70,  136 

Pre-Communist  China 73 

Prostes,  Luiz  Carlos 67 

Program  for  Cuba,  A  (article) 108 

Purge 48 

Pyongyang 68 

Q 

Quevado,  Numa 134 

R 

Radio  Moscow 124 

Ravines,  Eudocio 136 

Red  China 68 

Reds  in  Ecuador  Accused  of  Plot  (article) 107 

Revival  of  the   Communist   International   and   Its  Significance  for  the 

United  States  (article) 54 

Reyes,  P 103 


INDEX  vn 

Eiots:  Page 

In  Bogota,  Colombia 115 

In  Caracas,  Venezuela 115,  124 

In  La  Paz,  Bolivia 115,  134 

At  Maiquetta  Airport 130 

At  San  Marcos  University 124 

Roca,  Bias  (general  secretary,  Popular  Socialist  Party  of  Cuba) 41, 

42,  70,  88,  89,  93,  101 

Article  by 88 

Rodriguez,  Dr.  Carlos  Rafael  (editor,  "Hoy") 41,  42,  92,  93 

Rodriguez,  Guadalupe  (Mexican  Communist  Party) 63 

Roniualdi,  Serafino 117,  128 

Roosevelt,  President 40,  51 

Rosenberg,  Ethel  and  Julius 106 

Russia 47 

Ryerson,  Stanley  B 41 


Salvador,  David  (secretary,  Confederation  of  Cuban  Workers) 93 

Sandino,  August  Cesar 102 

San  Marcos  University  in  Peru 124 

Schroeder,  Frank  W 33 

Solaris,  Louis 132 

■"The  Second  Imperialist  War"  (by  Earl  Browder) 40 

.Senate  Foreign  Relations  Committee 73 

Serve  vev 124 

Smith,  Ambassador  E.  T 99,  100 

Socialist 50 

Socialist  Party  of  the  United  States 48 

Socialist  Revolutionary  Party 44 

Somoza,  Luis  (President,  Nicaragua) 99 

Sour  wine,  J.  G 33 

Soviet  Embassy 118 

Soyiet  Federation 50 

Soviet  Legation 116 

Stalin,  Joseph 48,  137 

Starnes,  Mr 138 

Starobin,  Joseph 41,  42,  122,  123 

State  Department 46,  115,  116,  121,  122,  135 

Strack,  Celeste _- 41 

Stroessner,  Alfredo  (dictator,  Paraguay) 99 

Szulc,  Tad :. 103,  107,  108,  125 

T 

"Teheran"  (by  Earl  Browder) 40 

Telleria,  Luis  Angel : -     136 

Teng,  Hsiao-ping,  Chinese  Communist  Party _' 69 

Thirtieth  Anniversary  of  the  First  Conference  of  the  Communist  Parties 

of  Latin  America  (art  icle) 63 

Thompson,  Robert  (executive  secretary,  CPUSA) 41,  94 

Time  Magazine 135 

Togliatti,  Palmiro  (secretary,  Latin  American  Secretariat  in  Moscow) 37,  48 

Toledano,  Mr.  Lombardo 62 

Toledano,  Vicente  Lombardo 40,  116 

Tomlinson,  Edward 34 

Tribuna  Popular  (Venezuelan  newspaper) 126,  128,  130,  132,  134 

Trot  sky ,  Leon - 40 

Trotsky  ites - 48 

Trujillo    Molina,    Trujillo    y    Medina,    Generalissimo     Rafael     Leonidas 

(Dominican  Republic) 98,  99 

U 

Union  Republic  na  Democratica  (student  organization) 126 

University  of  Bogota 39,  44 

University  of  Caracas 39,  45,  1 28 

University  of  Montana 124 


Vm  INDEX 

Page 

University  of  San  Marcos  in  Lima 125 

U.S.  Embassy 121,  122,  125,  136 

U.S.  Information  Agency 128,  136 

U.S.  Secret  Service " 12& 

"U.S.  over  Latin  America" 103 

V 

Vargas  government 5$ 

Velazquez,  Wilfredo  (Communist  Party,  Cuba) 69 

Venezuela 44-46,  132,  134,  136,  140 

"Victory  and  After"  (by  Earl  Browder) 40 

Videla,  President  Gonzalez 118 

Viera,  Gilberto  (secretary,  Communist  Party  of  Colombia) 39,  44,  69,  123 

Villegas,  Victor  (Trotskyite  leader) 136 

Visits  to  Peking,  Shanghai  (radiocast) 70 

Voorhis,  Mr 138 

W 

Wagenknecht,  Alfred 132 

Wang  Chia-hsiang  (Central  Committee,  Chinese  Communist  Party) 69 

Wang  Li-chih 70 

Warren,  Fletcher 128 

Washington  Evening  Star 130 

The  Way  Out  (statement  by  Earl  Browder) 40 

What  Bogota  Blowup  Reveals  (article) 122 

What  Latin  America  Means  to  Us  (excerpt  from  book,  "Look  Southward, 

Uncle") 34,  35 

"What  Is  the  Nature  of  Cuba's  Revolution?"  (article) 88 

White,  Charles - 137 

White,  Gilberto  Viera 123 

White,  Lincoln 116 

Whitney,  Mr 137 

Worker  {see  also  Daily  Worker) 88 

February  8,  1959 94 

May  31,  1959 89 

World  Economic  Conference  of  Free  Trade  Unions 60 

World  Federation  of  Trade  Unions 135 

World  Marxist  Review 58,  62,  103 

April  1959 91 

July  1959 63 

World  War  II 36 

Wu  Chih-pu,  Chinese  Communist  Party,  Honan 70 

Y 

Yankee  Imperialism 51,  67 

"Yenan  Way,  The" 136 

Z 

Zuazo,  Hernan  Siles  (Bolivian  President) 136 

o 


BOSTON  PUBLIC  LIBRARY 


3  9999  05445  3350 


^    V