The Connoisseur
An Illustrated Magazine
For Collectors
Edited by C. R. Grundy
Vol. XLIL
(MAY AUGUST, 1915)
LONDON
Published by OTTO LIMITED, ai the
Editorial and Advertisement Offices of I'm I woisseur,
at Hanover Buildings, 35-39, Maddox Street, W.
i9'S
N
1
PRINTED BY
BEMROSE AND SONS LTD.
DERBY AND LONDON
X
8 0 U 6 3 9
INDEX
ARTICLES AND NOTES
PAGE
American Art Sales ... ... ... ... ■•• 1 75
Answers to Correspondents 63, 127, 190, 255
(Genealogical & Heraldic 1
' ; 12s. 256
Authors.
Baird, Edwin R. Peasant Jewellery of Holland 91
Brinton, Selwvn. The Davenham Collection of
English Eighteenth Century- Caricaturists 131
Cecil, George. The History of the Glove ... 3
Clive. .Mrs. Kate Villiers. Collecting Antique
China and Pottery Dogs 214
Clowes, Ronald. Georgian Mansions in Ireland... 14?
Editor, The (C. R. Grundy).
A Suggestion for War Memorials ... ... 235
War and British Art 195
Evans, Joan. Old English Chatelaines ... ... 141
Falkner, Frank. A Loan Collection of Ralph
Wood Figures and Groups at the Whitworth
Institute Galleries, Manchester ... ... 76
Gray, W. E. On the Collecting of War Medals.
Part II 27
Holworthy, Richard, F.S.G. Wills and Testa-
ments ... ... ... ... ... ... I91
Jackson, Mrs. F. N'evill. Balloon Caricatures ... > ;
Macfall, Haldane.
Hi'- Years of Mahogany. Part XI. The
Director Chippendale Chair ... ... 15
The War and British Art. Part XII. ... 202
Mew, Egan. Object-, of Chinese Art .it the
Burlington Fine Arts Club...' ... ... 153
Murdoch, W. G. Blaikie. Early Stuart Portraits 67
Beckington Abbey ... ... ... ... ••• 126
Blakeslee Sale. The ... ... ... ... ... 1
Books Review id.
"American Fire-marks." I I5 Harold E. Gillii
ham. of Philadelphia ... ... ... 120
" Antique Furniture." By Fred W. Burgess ... 213
" Artist and the Public, and 1 >1 1" 1 I a) s on \i 1
jecf I >) Kenyon I ... ... | I
•• Cameo ( olle( ting." B3 I dv ard Good 1
Catalog ' Antique Furniture. By Messrs.
D,i\ is & Son . I td....
Catalogue oi Drawings .""l I ngravings, from
Mr. F. K. Meatyard 188
Books Rf vie wed — continued.
Catalogue of Messrs. E. Parsons <S Son-....
" Chats on Japanese Print:-." By Arthur David-
son Ficke
Chats on Old Silver." By Arthur Hayden ...
"Chemistry of Paints and Paintings, The." By
Sir A. H. Church
"Chinese Potterv and Porcelain" By K. L.
Hobson, B.A.
"Etching: A Practical Treatise." By Earl 11.
Reed
"Goldsmith and the Young Couple, The." By
H. Clifford Smith. F.S.A
"Guide to Furniture Values." By Mr. Herbert
Cescinsky
" How to Appreciate Prints." By Frank Weiten-
kampf
" Index to Periodicals "
" Juliette Iirouet's Love Letters to Victor Hugo."
By Louis Guimbard. Ti inslal I
Theodora Davidson
"King's Ships, The." Bv Commander II. S.
Lecky. Vol. Ill
"Lithography and Lithographei B5 foseph
Pennell and E. Robins Pennell ...
" Manor House of Lacolle, The." By
Lighthall, K.C
" Mediaeval Bedposts in Broughton
Chester, The." By the Rev.
John Timbrell, M.A.
" Memoirs ol the 1 >uke de Sainl -
translation by Ii.ni> is irkwright.
Monograph on Leonard" da \ mi i's
I 1 1 By John R I j re...
" Napoleon in Exileat St. Helena." Bj N01
" pia< e \.in" "i 1 : I and Wales." 1 1
Rev. James B. John on, MA, B.D.
" S> 1 1 "I Mediaeval I ngland, I he." B-\ \ 1
I ,ea< li ...
■■ rreasun Hunt: The Conspirators in Con
stantinople, 1 he." By Arthur I
Liberty
1 uni' 1 1 atal 1 ue, A
Yeai Bi » ■ :. - il Vmi 1 ii an Etchi 191
British Industries Fair at the Agricultural Hall ...
\V.
Church.
\\ I
Mo
PAGE
254
-41
[88
118
i7
5 1
244
2:4
242
242
119
[17
244
1 20
243
4"
188
120
; 1
1-2
111
Index
PAG]
< aricatun >, Balloo B Mrs. F. Nevill Jackson... 83
Caricaturists, English Eighteenth Century. By
Selwyn Brinton ... ... ... ... 131
i hinese Art, Objei 1 of, a1 the Burlington Fine Arts
Club 1 1 Egan Mew ... ... ... 153
Coins and Medals.
War Medals, On the Collecting of. Part II.
1:, W I Gray 27
I ECTIO
Davenham Collection of English Eighteenth
Century Caricatures. Y>\ Selwyn Brinton i;i
Sydnej Collection, The, Sale oi ... ... ... 182
Crane, Walter, The late ... ... ... ... 61
Currenl Art Notes ... ... ... ^2, 121, 176, 245
{Fo\ d( tails, see under Exhibitions and Galleries.)
Dunster Castle... ... ... ... ... ... [69
Etchings and Engravings.
Balloon Caricatures. By Mrs. F. Nevill Jackson S3
Exhibitions and Galleries.
Academy, Royal. Second Notice... ... ... 176
Agnew's, Messrs., Loan Collection of Pictures by
British and Dutch Masters, in aid of the
British Red Cross Society ... ... ... 252
Edinburgh Exhibitions ... ... ... ... 180
Glasgow Exhibitions ... ... ... ... 1S0
Goupil Gallery, The, Second Exhibition of the
London Group at ... ... ... ... ;r
Grosvenor Gallery, The, Exhibition of the National
Portrait Society at ... ... ... ... 54
Guildhall, Naval and Military Works at the ... 245
International Society of Sculptors, Painters, and
('.ravers. The ... ... ... ... 179
Loudon Group, The, Second Exhibition of ... 56
Miniature Painters, Royal Society of, Exhibition
at the Modern Gallery ... ... ... 251
National Portrait Society, The, Exhibition of ... 54
New English Art Club. Exhibition at the Suffolk
Stint 1 '.alleries of the Royal Society of
British Artists ... ... ... ... 253
Plate, British Regimental. Exhibition of, at the
Goldsmiths and Silversmiths Company's
Galleries, in aid of the British Red Cross
Society ... ... ... ... ••• 182
Plate, Old English, Exhibition of, at Messrs.
Garrard's, in aid of the British Red Cross
Society ... ... ... ... ... 181
Royal Academy, The, First Notice ... ... 121
Royal Institute of Painters in Water-Colours,
The, Exhibition of ... ... ... ... 59
Roval Society of British Artists, The, 143rd
Exhibition of ... ... ... ... 55
Royal Society of Painters in Water-Colours, The,
164th Exhibition of... ... ... ... 52
Royal Society of Portrait Painters, Twenty-fifth
Exhibition of, at the Grafton Galleries ... 2:2
Wbitworth Institute Galleries, Manchester. A
Loan Collection of Ralph Wood Figures
and Groups ... ... ... ... ... 76
Furniture.
( atalogue oi Messrs. Fraser cV Co. ... ... 62
Messrs. Williamson & Cole... ... 62
1 hippendale Chair, ["he Director. Bv Haldane
Macfall ' 15
French Furniture, The " Straight Line" in ... 42
Furniture — continued.
Mahogany, The Yeai o) PartXI. rheDirector
Chippendale Chair. By Haldam Macfall... 15
Mahogany. The Years of. Part XII, By Hal-
dane Macfall 202
Glass.
English Cut-Glass, Old 102
Glove, The, History of. By George Cecil ... ... 3
Ireland, Georgian Mansions in. By Ronald Clowes 145
Ives Sale, The ... ... ... ... ... •■■ 17?
Ivory.
Horn. Carved... ... ... ... ... ■•■ 42
Powder-Flask 104
Jewels, Antique.
Chatelaines, Old English. By Joan Evans ... 141
Holland, Peasant Jewellery of. By Edwin K.
Baird ~ 91
Mansions, Two Famous (Hardwick and Eridge) ... 10;
National Gallery, Report of the Committee of
Trustees of the ... ... ... ... 183
Needlework, Art. Royal School of ... ... ... 126
News-bill announcing the Defeat of Napoleon at
the Battle of Leipzig, October, 1813 ... 104
Notes and ( Hieries
5 I . I O I , I'll. 221
Pepys Family, Ancestral Home of, at Cottenham.
Carribs. 167
Pictures.
Stuart Portraits, Early. By W. G. Blaikie
Murdoch ..." 67
Turner. J. M. W., R.A., A newly-discovered
Portrait of ' 108
Plate Notes 45. Io6
Pottery and Porcelain.
Artistic Tableware ... ... ... ... ... 61
Chinese Pottery and Porcelain ... ... ... 37
Collecting Antique China and Pottery Dogs. By
Mrs Kate Villiers Clive ... ... ... 214
Etruscan Vase. A Fine ... ... ... ... 102
Lowestoft teapot ... ... ... ••• ••• 102
Ralph Wood Figures and Groups, Loan Collection
of, at the Whitworth Institute Galleries,
Manchester. By Frank Falkner ... ... 76
Wedgwood 126
Prints. See undei " Etchings and Engravings."
Provincial Art Notes.
Edinburgh. The Diploma Gallery ... ... 60
Walcot, Mr. William, Works of ... 60
Manchester. Whitworth Institute Galleries. A
Loan Collection of Ralph Wood Figures
and Groups ... ... ... ... ... 76
West Country, Antiques in... ... ... ... 126
Red Cross Sale at Christie's, The 11 1
(For details, set undei heading " In the Sale •
Room.")
Tudor House, Leigh, Surrey 61
War and British Art. By the Editor 195
War Memorials, A Suggestion for. By The Editor 235
Wills and Testaments. By Richard Hohvorthv,
F.S.G. 191
///(/c.y
ILLUSTRATIONS
Artists and Engravers. page
Apperley, O. Wynne, R.I. Playmates 52
Buck, Adam. Portrait of a Lady 47
Cooper, Samuel. Charles II 19"
Copley, John Singleton, R.A. George John, Earl
Spencer ... ... ■ ■ • • • • • • • 185
Cosway, Richard, R.A. Lady Jane Gore ... 196
Cruikshank, George. Balloon Caricatures by ... ":
Edwards, W. C. James I. of Scotland 68
Gabain, Ethel. Lithograph Portrait of Edward VI.
After Holbein 1,""
Green, Valentine. Jane Countess of Harrington.
Alter Sir J. Reynolds 1 97
Gros, An toine Jean Baron. Napoleon at Arcole... 24')
Grozer, J. Design. After Sir Joshua Reynolds 2
Guthrie, James. The Velvet Cloak 177
Hoppner, J., R.A. Portrait of Mrs. Robinson
(" Perdita ") 2.31
Hugo, Victor. The Bridge of Marne 117
Humphry, Ozias. The Maid of Bath 239
Janet. Mary Queen of Scots 77
Lely, Sir Peter.
Anne Hyde, Duchess of York 139
Countess of Grammont, The ... ... ... 35
Marin. Louis
Girl taking Coffee '"'
La Petite Fille an Chien 151
Morland, G.
St. James's Park. By F. de Soiron 173
Tea Garden, A. By F. de Soiron 130
Xorthcote, J., R.A. The Alpine Traveller. By
J. Ward 66
Pinturrichio. .Eneas Sylvius Piccolomini before
James I. of Scotland ... ... ... 69
Reynolds, Sir J.
David Garrick ... ... ... ••• ••• §9
Delaval, Sir Francis Blake 149
Design. By J. Grozer 2
Georgiana Duchess of Devonshire ... ii, 163
Jane Countess of Harrington. By Valentine
Green ... ... ... ■•• •■• ••• *97
Portrait of Lady Skipworth ... ... ... 57
.. Miss Theophila Palmer 231
Romney, George. Portrait of the Hon. Edward
Ward ' i'
Rowlandson, T.
Bear and thi Beai I ider, The 1 m
Chase I he ' '
Married ... ... ... ■•• ••• ••• < ?7
Return from Gretna Green, ["he 1
Unmarried... ... ... ... ••• ■■• ' 5°
Woolpack, I he 133
Woolpack at Hungerford, Berk . ["he 131
Russell, ]. Feeding 1 hii ki ns. B) P. \Y.
Tomkin
Smith. J. R.
Interior of Carlisle House, Soho Square, The... 201
Shepherdess, 1 he Wti c S Wood 1 1 -
" What you will ' -•;
Soiron, F. de.
St. James's Park. After G. Morland 173
Tea Garden. A. After G. Morland 130
Artists and Engravers ■- -continued, page
Steuben. The 1 tea poll on 46
Tollemache, The Hon. Duff. The Cha 1 thi
German Cruisers on January 24th, ni;... 245
Tomkins. P. W. Feeding Chickens Alter J.
Russell 99
Van der Goes (ascribed to).
James III. of Scotland ... ... ... ••• 7°
Margaret of Denmark. Queen ot Scotland ... 71
Van Dyck, Sir A
Earl of Bristol and the Earl of Bedford. The... 229
Lady Wharton ••• 2 19
Ward. J. The Alpine Traveller. Alter J.
Xorthcote, R.A
Wildman, Edmund, Junior. Portrait oi I M W.
Turner, R.A. ... •■• ••• •■• lj;
Woodford. S. The Shepherd.-, By J. R.
Smith 193
Bronze Lamp in Pisa Cathedral ... ... •■• 238
Broughton Church, Coat of Arms on Bedpost at... 119
Celtic Bronze Mirrors ... ... ... ••• ■■• j;;
Chandelier, French, Eighteenth Century 2\;
Gilded Wrought-iron
Engravings.
Balloon Caricatures ... ... ••• 83, N
Dress Caricatures, Paris ...
Edward VI. Lithograph Portrait alter Holbein...
Genius starving in an Attic
Harrington, Jane Countess of. Bj V. Green.
After Sir J. Reynolds
James I. of Scotland. By W. C. Edwards
Oxford Castle, View of. Engraving published
1809
Furniture.
( hippendale.
Armchair ...
rabl eted seat frame...
w ith slutted seat
Cli. hi 1
" Dolphin leg
'• rabbi ti 1 seat frame...
Chairs, Ribband-back ... ... ••• ' ■"
" Charterhouse " Chairs ...
Direi ti ir " Chair, Walnut
" Frem h 1 hail ■ "...
1 lothii < haii s, Mahi 1
Mai .m\ \nnchairs
Chairs...
(hair, with " angle brackel
" French Chair "
" Stuffed Armi hail
Walnut Chair
,, Chairs
(hair, « ith angle bra< kets
Directoire Se< re1 lire
I mpire I iresi ing 'I able
Louis \ \ I < al t . I arly...
Lacquer < abinet.'Blai k
21
21 2.
5-38
36
87
197
68
132
199
1
17
1 :
22
11.
!, [9
zio
213
21 I
'7
-;
IN
23
4s
I \
43
Index
Furniture — continued. page
Mantelpiece of Carved Pine, Early and Middle
Eighteenth Century... ... ... ... 2><?
Sea Chest, Old 162
Gauntlets, Steel. Sixteenth Century, Italian ... 3
,, ,, .. ,, Spanish ... 4
Glass.
Cut-glass Candelabra ... ... ... ... 104
Carved Jars of Classical Outline ... 103
Glove, Kmhroidered, late Sixteenth Century ... 8
Leather, Embroidered, Mid-Seventeenth
Century ... ... ... ... ... 13
Linen ... ... ... ... ... ... 5
Gloves, Embroidered, Elizabethan ... ... ... 7
,, James I. ... ... ... 10
,, Leather, Early Seventeenth Century, Eng-
lish ... ' 9
,, {see also under headings " Gauntlets " and
" Mittens.")
Horn, Carved Ivors' ... ... ... ... ... 42
Ireland, Georgian Mansions in.
Curraghmore : The Dining Room... ... ... 147
,, Seat of the Marquess of Waterford,
Fountain at ... ... ... no
Ivory.
Horn, Carved ... ... ... ... ... 42
Powder-flask 105
Jewellery.
Peasant Jewellery of Holland.
Buckles for Trousers ... ... ... ... 97
Buttons, Various ... ... ... ... ... 98
Cigar-case, Coral Purse, and Man's Purse ... 97
Coral Chain with Lock and Centre-piece of Gold 9?
Diamond Bonnet Pins ... ... ... ... 94
Ear-rings ... ... ... ... ... ...95,98
Flat Golden Plate attached to Head-bow or
Hood 92
Golden Lock of Plate and Threadwork ... 95
Gold or Silver-plate Hood for Women ... 91
Head-bows or Ear-irons ... ... ... ... 91
Head-wear of Plain Golden Plates ... ... 92
Hood and Bonnet Pins ... ... ... ... 94
How Ornaments are worn ... ... 93, 94
Locks for Coral Neck-chains ... ... ... 96
Metal Buckle 98
Pending Parts of the Spirals ... ... ... 92
Silver Case for Knitting-needles ... ... 98
Watch-chain with Keys and Penders ... 96
Jewels, Antique.
Chatelaines by Perigal 142. M-3
Old English 142, 143
Fob-ring with Bezel in form of a Key ... ... 144
Watch-case of Gilt Metal, Filigree 144
Shagreen studded with Marcasites 144
Watch Pendant, from " Fraser-Tytler " Portrait
of Mary Queen of Scots ... ... ... 142
Mansions, Old English.
Dunster Castle 168
Eridge, Seat of the Most Hon. the Marquess of
Abergavenny ... ... ... ... 107
Hardwick Hall, a Seat of the Duke of Devonshire 109
Staircase in Cottenham "Lordship House" ... 167
Mi dals. pagi
Crimean, Indian, African, and Canadian... ... 24
Medals and Decorations, Regimental and Other... 29
Miniatures.
Charles II. By Samuel Cooper ... ... ... 196
Gore, Lady Jane. By Richard Cosway, R.A. ... 196
Mittens, Embroidered, Elizabethan ... ... ... 6
News-bill announcing the Defeat of Bonaparte at
the Battle of Leipzig; ... ... ... 106
Objets d'Art.
Chalcedony Bottles, Translucent ... ... ... 247
Chinese.
Black and Dark Grey Jade Recumbent Horse 159
Bronze Ewer, with inlay of Gold and Silver,
Sung Dynasty ... ... ... ... 157
Carved and Lacquered Wood Figures... ... 153
Ivory Figures, Ming Dynasty and later 155
Figure of an Emperor, enthroned 133
Mottled Green Jade Recumbent Buffalo, Sixth
Century a.d. ... ... ... ... ■■• 154
Panels of Dark Brown Lacquer, early part of
the Reign of K'ang-hsi ... ... ... 156
Pewter Bowls, covered with Gold Lacquer and
Shell Inlay, probably Ming Dynasty ... 158
Tapestry Pictures, Ch'ien Lung Period ... 160
Ts'ung, of Grey-green and Yellow Jade, Chou
Dynasty ' 159
White Jade Dragon-Horse (Lung-Ma)... ... 154
Yellow Bronze Box, lined with Black Lacquer,
Ming Dynasty ... ... ... ... 158
Lacquer, Inlaid Black, Panels ... ... ... 251
Table Screen ... ... 231
Screen in Dining Room at Florence Court ... 150
Pictures and Drawings.
Bear and the Bear Leader, The. Drawing by
T. Rowlandson 134
Bridge of Marne. Drawing by Victor Hugo ... 117
Chase, The. Drawing by T. Rowlandson ... 135
Chase of the German Cruisers on January 24th,
i9i5,The. By the Hon. Duff Tollemache 243
Death-bed of Napoleon, The. By Steuben ... 46
Delavel, Sir Francis Blake. By Sir J. Reynolds,
P.R.A. 149
Interior of Carlisle House, Soho Square. Drawing
by J. R. Smith 201
James L, King ... ... ... ... ... 67
James II., King ... ... ... ... ... 68
James III. of Scotland. Ascribed to Van der
Goes ... ... ... ... ... ••• 7°
James IV. of Scotland, Drawing of ... ... 73
Portrait of ... ... 74
James V. and Mary of Guise ... ... •■■ 75
Margaret of Denmark, Queen of Scotland.
Ascribed to Van der Goes... ... ... 71
Margaret Tudor, Queen of James IV., Drawing of 73
Married. Drawing by T. Rowlandson ... ... 137
Mary of Guise, Queen of James V. (Drawing) ... 72
Napoleon at Arcole. Bv Antoine Jean Baron
Gros 246
Palmer. Miss Theophila, Portrait of. By Sir J.
Reynolds, P.R.A 231
Piccolomini, .-Eneas Sylvius, before James I. of
Scotland. By Pmturicchio ... ... 69
Index
, Portrait of. By
101, 161, 165, i66, 21 1
Rowlandson
Pictures and Drawings — continued.
Playmates. By O. Wynne Apperley, H.I.
Return from Gretna Green. The. Drawing bj
T. Rowlandson
Robinson, Mrs. (" Perdita '
J. Hoppner. R.A. ...
Unidentified Pictures ... 51-34
Unmarried. Drawing by T
Velvet Cloak, The. By James Guthrie
Ward, The Hon. Edward, Portrait of. P.\ < I
Romney
Woolpack, The. Drawing by T. Rowlandson ...
YVoolpack at Hungerford, Berks. , The. Drawing
by T. Rowlandson ...
Plates.
Alpine Traveller, The. By J. Ward, after J.
Northcote, R.A
Altar-piece, Italian, Seventeenth Century
Anne Hyde, Duchess of York. By Sir Peter
Lely
Bristol, The Earl of, and the Earl of Bedford.
By Sir A. Van Dyck
Design. By J. Grozer, after Sir Joshua Rey-
nolds ...
Feeding Chickens. By P. W. Tomkins, after
J. Russell
Garrick, David. By Sir J. Reynolds, P. R.A. ...
George John, Earl Spencer. By John Singleton
Copley, R.A.
Georgiana, Countess Spencer, and her daughter,
Lady Georgiana, afterwards Duchess of
Devonshire
Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire. By Sir
Joshua Reynolds ... ... ... 11
Girl taking Coffee. By Louis Marin
Grammont, The Countess of. By Sir Peter Lely
Lady, Portrait of. By Adam Buck
La Petite Fille an Chien. By L. Marin
Maid of Bath, The. By Ozias Humphry
Mary Queen of Scots. By Janet ...
St. James's Park. By F. de Soiron, after G.
138
231
-224
1 56
177
14"
133
131
66
115
139
229
2
99
89
l8q
163
219
3 5
47
1 5 1
239
77
Morland
173
Shepherdess, The.
Woodford
By J. R. Smith, after S.
[93
Skipworth, Lady,
Portrait ol B3 Sir Joshua
Hevnolds
57
1 ea ' larden, A.
By !■'. de Soiron, after G.
Morland
130
Turner, J. M. W
. R \ Pi iitr.nl of B) I
Plates — continued.
Wharton, Lady. By Sir A. Van Dyck
•What you will!" nd after J. R. Smith
Pottery and Porcelain.
Chelsea Groups, Rare
Chiix 1
Han Potterv Model of a " Fowling Tower" ...
Pilgrim Bottle. T'ang Pottery ...
Porcelain Figure of Slum Lao, " Famille Verte,"
K'ang-hsi Period
Stoneware Vase, Sung Dynasty...
Tang Pottery Dish
Vases, Various
Derby Group : Pointer and Setter
Etruscan Vase, A Fine
Lowestoft Teapot ...
Milton, Bust of
Pottery Dogs, Mid-Victorian
Ralph Wood.
Bust of Milton
Figure of Pointer Dog ...
Figure : The Bull-bait ...
Figure of Toby Jug
Groups : St. George and the Dragon, and The
Widow nl Saivtta ...
Model of the Neapolitan Lion ...
White Statuettes : Neptune and Venus
Rockingham.
Pointer
Poodle
Soho Pottery...
Staffordshire.
Begging Poodles, Pair of...
Figures
Poodle with Cat ...
Poodles, Pair of ...
Wedgwood Plate
Wood and Caldwell.
Worcester Poodle
Pair of Sporting 1 logs
Silver.
Seventeenth-century Posset-pot and Cover
Sheffield Candlestick, Eighteenth Century
249
40
38
37
}8
41
39
215
102
C03
218
79
82
80
82
81
76
80
217
216
54
218
214
217
216
56
ji ;
216
187
is;
Wildman, jun.
Tnblc-i loth. Design lor a
Wrought-iron Lamp at Chelsea Hospital 237
IN THE SALE ROOM
Arms and Armi n r.
1st an ellr, Mul Sixteenth Century...
Helmet, < lose, l, third quarter o\ the Sixteenth
1 entury
Pi tol, Flint-lock, Highland
Pistols, Duelling, Antique Engraved Steel and
Brass, Pair of
i;i
1,-1
J jo
Arms \nii Armour — continued.
Si iinit.ir, w 11I1 Jade ( trip, found in the Palao
1 ipj Sultan a1 Seringa] ia tam ...
Sword, Twelfth Century
Wheel loi k Spoi ting i run l ioul le-barrel.
Rifle, dated 1:646
171
1 1
171
1
Index
\i rOGRAPH !.
American War of Independence, Docunn m
relating to
Austen, Jane. Original -MS. of "The Watsons,"
Unfinished Novel
British Colonies, Documents relating to...
Bronte, Charlotte. First French Exercise Book of
Chatham, Lord. Holograph Letter of ...
Dickens, Charles. Five Pages of the Original
Autograph MS. of Chapter 19 of " Pickwick
Papers "
" Henry VIII.'s Moste Honourable Councell,"
MS. Account of the Dinners provided for,
from nth Dec, 1514, to 5th April, 1515...
Ireland, Documents relating to, 17S2-9 ...
Kello, Mrs. Argumenta in Librorum Psalmorum,
Estherae Inglis manu exarata
Kipling, Rudyard. One-page Autograph Draft
of " For all we have and are "...
Meredith, George, and Sutro, Alfred. Un-
published Play, " The Egoist," with Auto-
graph Pages and Corrections by Meredith
Nelson, Admiral Lord.
Letter addressed to Sir Hercules Ross
Original Autograph Log-book of
Shirley, Governor, Letters of
Stevenson, R. L.
Letter, dated from Vailima, to Mrs. Billson...
Proof-sheets of " Underwoods." inscribed in
Stevenson's Autograph
Sullivan, Sir Arthur. Original MS. Score of
" Utopia "
Sydney (N.S.W.), Documents relating to
Taunton, T. H. Portraits of Celebrated Race-
horses, Original MS. of
Wolfe, Lt.-Col. James, Four-page Letter of ...
Books and Manuscripts.
Ackermann. Microcosm of London, t, Vols ,
1808-9
Aiken.
Collection of Works of ...
Sporting Satirist, 1834 ...
Aiken, Cruikshank, etc. Annals of Sporting and
Fancy Gazette, 1822-8
Aiken, Henry. National Sports of Great Britain.
1825
Aiken, Samuel. Delineations of British Field
Sports, 1823 ...
Annual Register, The, 175S-1907...
Apperley, C. J. (" Nimrod "). Life of a Sports-
man, 1st Edition, 1842
Barlow, F. Seuerall Wayes of Hunting, Hawking,
and Fishing, 1671
Beaumont & Fletcher. Comedies and Tragedies,
1st Collected Edition. 1647...
Berners, Juliana. The Gentleman's Academic,
1595
Bowles. Life of Jack Sheppard, 1724 ; and The
Prison Breaker, 1725
Browning. Pauline, 1st Edition, Original Boards
Campbell. James. Treatise of Modern Faulconrv,
1st Edition, E773
Careless, John. The Old English Squire, 1st
Edition, 1821...
Chippendale. The Gentleman and Cabinet-
maker's Director, 3rd Edition, uncut. 1762
226
17-
226
172
226
226
226
172
172
172
226
172
226
22S
226
227
228
227
227
227
227
j j'
228
F. W. Atlantic Neptune, The,
227
17-
226
175
226
175
227
227
172
11 s
0-5
^7
227
228
Books and Manuscripts — continued.
Clovis Eve. I.e Psautier de David, with Binding
Cox. X. Gentleman's Recreation, is1 Edition,
1674
Currer, Ellis, and Acton Bell. P. .ems by
Curtis's Botanical Magazine, 94 NCI - . 17*7-1X8*.
etc.
Defoe, Daniel. Robinson Crusoe, 3 Vols., 1st
Edition
Des Barres, J
1 770-80
I ir kens. Charles. American Notes, with Presenta-
tion Inscription from the Author...
Egan, Pierce.
Boxiana, 5 Vols., 1818-29
Life in London, and Finish to Life in London,
Large Paper, 2 Vols., 1823-30
Elwes, H. J. and Henry- A. The Trees of Great
Britain and Ireland, 1905-13
Fitzherbert, Sir A. The Boke of Husbandrye,
now lately corrected and amended, 1568...
Gagliardelli, S. Preces Latini, Illuminated MS.,
with Miniatures and Initials by
Galle. A'enationis, Piscationis et Aucupii Typi,
1582 ' ...
Gosden, Thomas.
Essays on Hunting, by a Country Squire, 1st
Edition. 1733
Impressions of a Series of Animals. Birds, etc.,
1821
Volume containing Engraved Portrait of, and
Autograph Letters addressed to ...
Graves, Algernon, and W. V. Cronin. History of
the Works of Sir Joshua Reynolds, 13 Vols.,
1899
Gray's " Elegy," Large Paper Copy of Van Voorst's
Edition, containing 19 of the Original
Drawings by Constable, 1836
Great Nuremberg Chronicle, 1st Edition, 1493...
Hora. Fifteenth-century English MS. ...
Hours, Book of. Fifteenth-century French MS. 17;
Fourteenth-centurv MS. on
Vellum ... ... ... 226
Kipling, Rudyard. Echoes, by Two Writers, with
an Original Autograph Unpublished Poem,
"To the Ladies of Warwick Gardens" ... 172
Lilford. Lord. Coloured Figures of the Birds of
the British Islands, - Vols., uncut, 1891-7 228
Linschoten. Discours of Vovages into ye Easte
and West Indies, 159S ... ... ... 226
Lords, House of, Journal of the. Vols, I. (1507)
to CXIX, (1885), etc. (140 Vols) ... 226
Markham, Gervase. The Young Sportsman's
Delight and Instructor ... ... ... 228
McLean.
Sporting Repository-. The. 1822 ... ... ... 227
Sporting Scrap Books, fifty Coloured Plates... 227
Meyer, L. British Birds, 4 Vols , 1835-4] ■•- 228
National Biography, Dictionary- of, 70 Vols., [885-
1912 ... ... ... ... ... ... 227
Piranesi's " Opere varie de Architettura, " 1750... 226
Scott and Bewick. Sportsman's Cabinet, 1803-4 22&
Sheraton, T. The Cabinet-Maker and Uphol-
sterer's Drawing Book, 1802 ... ... 228
Smith, J. C. British Mezzotint Portraits. 4 Vols.,
1884 228
228
22*
175
226
226
vm
Index
PAGE
Books and Manuscripts — continued.
Sporting Magazine, 1793-1S70 ... ... ... 228
Stevenson, R. L.
A Child's Garden of Verses, 1st Edition, nncnt,
1885 172
Father Damien, original issue, 1890 ... ... 172
Underwoods, Proof-sheets of, inscribed in
Stevenson's Autograph ... ... ... 172
Surtee, R. S.
Analysis of the Hunting Field. 1st Edition, 1846 228
Handler Cross, 1st Edition, 1854 228
Vern'et and Lanin. Collection des Uniformes des
Armees Franchises, 1791-1S14. 100 Coloured
Plates 227
Walton and Cotton. Complete Angler, 1808 ... jj.s
Westmacott, C. M. I he English Spy, 1st Edition,
1825-6 .' 228
Williamson, Capt. T. Oriental Field Sports, 1 807 228
Bronzes. [See undei Sculpture.)
Coins and Medals.
Bank of England " Bank Post Bill " for ;m,
endorsed by the Duke of Wellington ... 171
Barossa, Battle of, Gold " Eagle " Badge of ... 171
Carthage Silver Tetradrachm of Siculo-Punic
Fabric, circa 410-310 b.c ... ... ... 171
" India. Army of," Silver War Medal, with ( lasps
of " Ava " and " Maheidpoor " ... ... 171
James I. Thirty-shilling Gold Piece ... ... 171
Queen Anne Five-guinea Gold Piece ... ... 171
Embroideries.
Turkish Prayer Rug
Engravings and Etchings.
Abbott, L. F. The Rt. Hon. Lord Hood. Admiral
of the Blue. After V. Green
\ gar, J. Mr-;. Duff. After R. Cosway...
Brompton, Richard. William, Earl of Chatham.
By Edward Fisher ...
Cosway, Maria Mrs. Cosway. By V. Green ...
Cosway, R. Mrs. Duff. By J. Agar
Cousins, S.
La Surprise. After C. M. Dubuffe
Mi^s Macdonald. After Sir T. Lawrence
Dubuffe, C. M. La Surprise. By S. Cousins ...
Fisher, Edward. William, Earl of Chatham.
After Richard Brompton ...
Green, V.
Mrs. Cosway. Alter Maria Cosway
Right Hon. Lord Hood, The. Admiral of the
Blue. After I I Abbott...
11,'iig, Axel. The Portals of Rheims Cathedral...
Lawrence, Sir T. Miss Macdonald. By S. Cousins
Reynolds, Sir J. Mrs. Carnac B3 J. R Smith
Smith, J. R, Mrs. Carnac. After Sir J. Reynolds
Furniture.
Vdam.
1 arved and Gilt Oval Frame Wall Mirror ...
Mahogany Sideboard
Anne, Queen. Walnut Chairs
Boulli Bracket Clock, by Cohendoz, Paris
( Ihippendale
< arved and (lilt Wall Mirror
Inlaid Carved Mahoganj Cabinet
11 j
22 5
11 j
11 j
1 1 2
lr3
112
112
1 13
■ 1 i
1 1 3
Furniture — continual.
Chippendale — mii//ji ueil.
Mahogany Chairs. Set of 12
Table
Dutch Marquetcrie Table ...
Flemish Walnut-wood Press, Seventeenth ( entury
French Parqueterie Commode
Georgian.
Inlaid Mahogany Dining Table...
Mahogany Bookcase
Wall Mirror, Early
Hepplewhite Inlaid Mahogany Bookcase...
Lacquered Cabinet, Black and Gold, Antique ...
Lacquer Screen, Chinese, Kang-he
Louis XV.
King-wood Bureau
,, Commodes
Marqueterie Tulip-wood and King-wood Com-
mode
King-wood Writing-table...
Louis XVI.
( arved Gilt Settee, with Seat and Mack in
Needlework ...
Marqueterie Writing-table
Parqueterie Cabinet
,, Commode
Writing-table, with Chased Ormolu Mounts ...
Nonsuch Chest. Inlaid. English, late Sixteenth
Century
Parqueterie Commode, with Ormolu Mounts
Regence Commode ...
Screen, Six-leaf, decorated in Chinese taste
Spanish Ten-leaf Leather Screen, second quarter
of Eighteenth Century
Walnut and Ebonised Cabinet, with Venetian
( rlass Panels ...
William and Mary.
Marqueterie Walnut Table
Walnut Arm-chair
High-back Chairs
Jewellery.
Amethyst Bead Necklace ...
Brilliant Brooch
Earrings, Pair of ...
blown Brooch and Pendant
Maltese Cross I 'endant ...
Rosetti 1 ;i h ...
1 iiam< "id I i\ 1 leal Flow ei Brooch
Scroll leaf and Spraj N« klai
Gold Enamel Necklace
Seal, sel with Emerald, engraved with the
Arms and ( \ phi I of Marj 1 hi
Snake Necklai e
Pearl Necklai e
Sapphire and Brilliant I li a< elet ...
114
114
171
171
114
114
1 1 I
227
"4
22<<
2 2'
227
227
227
22<>
114
227
2 2~
171
114
i;-
114
171
114
172
"4
J jo
"4
J JO
113
227
114
Laci
1 1 1
1 lomton 1
171
I. inn ricl Dn
"4
Mini \ 1 1 ri
114
Small, John.
j
II j
113
I I I
11 1
114
1 1 1
I I j
I I I
1 1 1
1
II I
17"
I he 1 Ion. Mrs. I lervej
Index
Musical Instruments.
Stradivarius, Antonius. Violin, bearing label
inscribed
Objets d'Ari
Boulle Bracket (lock, by ( ohendoz, Paris
Bracket Clock, Chiming, English, by James New-
ton, London ...
Bronzes {see under Sculpture).
Fan, Queen Mary's ...
Ivory Statuettes of the Virgin, Portuguese
Tusks, Japanese, Pair of ...
Vase, Flemish
Jade Bowl, Russian ...
with Silver Mounts, set with Diamonds
Lacquer.
Gold Lacquer Box
Japanese Gold Lacquer Writing-box ...
Louis XV. Tortoiseshell Inkstand...
Louis XVI. Gold Snuff-box
Russian Jade Bowl ...
Snuff-box, Gold, Louis XVI.
,, Silver
Pictures and Drawings.
Abbey. E. A., R.A. Portrait Head of H.R.H.
the Prince of Wales...
Allori. Portrait of a Lady
Backer, De. Portrait of a Man ...
Beattie-Brown. W.. R.S.A. The Pass of Shieldaig,
Ross-shire
Bierstadt. Sunset in the Mountains
Bogert, G. H. A Glorious Sunset...
Bone, Muirhead. Pencil Drawing of London
Architectural Subject
Boucher, Francois. Amorini
Burne- Jones, Sir E.
Female Head (red chalk)
Wedding of Psyche, The...
Cameron. Glencoe ...
Chase, W. M. A Wheatfield
Coates, George J. A Spanish Dancer ...
Collier, The Hon. John, Blank Canvas of
Connard, Philip, Portrait by
Constable. Hampstead Heath
Cope, A. S. Miranda
Corot. Hay Cart ...
Cranach, Lucas. The Jeweller's Daughter
Crane, B. Edge of the Woods
Crome, J. Old Bathing House, Norwich
J. B. Ostend Canal, Bruges
Diaz, N. V. Landscape ...
Dobson. Portrait of the Earl of Portland
Earl, Miss Maud. Poissons d'Avril
Farquharson, Joseph, R.A. The Crofter's Team
Fildes, Sir Luke. Marietta
Foster, Birket. View in Rouen ...
< ..imsborough, T.
Miss Marsham
(half-length portrait)
Gordon. Sir John Watson. The Mackenzie
Children
(.uerin, F. Eillette jouant avec un garcon
endormi
172
170
170
170
170
170
170
170
170
170
170
170
170
227
17^
1 1 1
175
112
i/5
1 1 2
175
112
112
1 12
175
1 12
G"5
175
175
175
112
175
112
1 1 1
182
Pictures ami Drawings — continued.
Harlow, William, landscape, with a View of
Eton College ...
II. lit, W. Cows Drinking...
Harvey, Sir George, P. R.S.A. Past and Present
Heffner, Prof. Karl. The Upper Reaches. Norfolk
Broads ... ... ... ...
1 loppner.
Portrait of Lady Campbell
,, the Countess of Guildford...
Hornel, E. A. In the Orchard
John, A. E. Portrait of the Chancellor oi the
Exchequer
Kessel, John Van. Landscape
Largilliere, X. de.
Portrait of a Lady of the Court of Louis XIV.
,, the Due de Penthievre
Laszlo. P. A. de. Portrait of Madame Marthe
Lettelier
La Thangue, H. H. In a Cottage Garden
Laverv, John, Blank Canvas of ...
Lawrence, Sir T.
Portrait of the Marquess of Hertford...
„ Lady Melville
Lely, Sir Peter. A Youth of the Bettmsun Family
Le Sidanier, H. La Boucherie ...
Lorenzetto, Mdlle. Jeunesse (Pastel)
Mcissonier. Cavalier of the Time of Louis XIII.
Mierevelt, Van. Portrait of Marguerite van Brom-
kart
Millais, Sir John. Attack on Kenilworth Castle...
Millet. The Granddaughter
Moran, T. The Feudal Tower ...
Mostyn, Tom. The Invaders
Muriilo. The Little Shepherd
Nattier. Portrait of Marie Anne Darras
Xormann. A. The Sognefjord. Norway...
Orchardson. Young Duke...
Orrock, James. On the Nith
Partridge, Bernard. The Excursionist ...
Perigal, Arthur, F.S.A.
Arran from the Cam braes
Fall on the Lednock, Perthshire
Pettie, J. The Ransom ...
Phillip, John, R.A. Pascuccia
Puligo, Domenico. Madonna and Child, with
St. John
Raeburn, Sir H.
Portrait of Lord Craig ...
,, ,, Mrs. Stuart Richardson
Rehn. "Where Waves and Moonlight Meet"...
Reynolds, Sir J.
Annabella, Lady Blake, in the Character of
" Juno "
Portrait of Miss Kitty Fisher
,, Mrs. Musters as " Hebe "...
,, Miss Theophilus Palmer ...
George Selwyn
(half-length portrait) ...
Reynolds (School of). Portrait of a Ladj
Richmond, Sir W. B. The Monastery from St.
Bernardino's Cell, Assisi
Riviere, H. G., Portrait by
22 K
175
zz7
227
175
175
112
112
'75
175
175
112
112
112
175
175
225
1 12
112
1 12
175
1 12
i/~5
175
1 12
175
175
227
175
1 11
112
227
22/
112
22/
175
175
17;
175
175
/-I
2 2^
IS2
114
I 1 2
I 12
Index
Pictures and Drawings — continued.
Romney, G.
John Thomas, 2nd Viscount Sydney
(half-length
portrait)
Portrait of Mrs. Appleby
,, Mrs. Drake ...
Rousseau, T. Landscape
Rubens. The Adoration of the Magi
Sargent, J. S. Charcoal Portraits by
Spagna. St. Mary Magdalene
Steer, P. Wilson. A Forest Glade
Steuben, R. La Mort de Napoleon
Storey, G. A. Coming Events
Stuart. Gilbert.
Thomas, 1st Viscount Sydney (half length) ...
„ ,, (three-quarter
length)
Tadema. Sir Alma-. Sculpture Gallery
Tholen, W. B. Nandschap, Holland
Titian.
Holy Family, with St. John, in a Landscape...
Susannah and the Elders
Tocque, Jean Louis. Portrait of Madame de la
Marteliere
Townsend, F. H. For the Wounded
Troy, De. Portrait of a Man
Truesdall, G. S. The Shepherd's Lunch
Turner, J. M. W.
Hilly Landscape ...
Sunset on the Sea...
Van Dvck (attributed to). A Lady of the
Coningsby Family
Van Orley. Virgin and Child
Velasquez. Mariana, Queen of Spain
Vely, Anatole. Love's First Steps
Verestchagin. Russian Blacksmith
\ Lgi e Le Brun, Madame.
Portrait of, by Herself
„ the Artist
,, Madame Vestris
Wootton, John.
Landscape Portrait Group of Sir Robert
Walpole, in Green Hunting Costume,
with Groom. Hunter, and Hounds
Landscape Portrait Croup of Sir Robert
Walpole, with Groom, Hunter, and
Hounds
Wyck, J. The Hon. Mrs. Townshend, nee
Selwyn
Wyllie, W. L. Destroyer versus Submarine
Ziem, F. Grand Canal, Venice
Zoffany. Portrait Group, in a Landscape
Pottery and Porcelain.
Berlin Tea and Coil" Service
Chelsea
Figure oi " I u >1 ii e
Scent-bottle
Chinese.
Amphora-shaped Famille-noire Vase
FamiUe-rose Figures of Deities, Kien-Lung
Period
Famille-verte Khang hsi Vase ...
225
182
175
175
1 12
175
1 12
112
112
17?
227
112
175
175
1 12
175
175
in
in
175
175
175
227
175
182
IS:
22;
112
175
225
175
1 1 1
175
Pottery and Porcelain — continued.
Chinese — continue,!.
Green Oviform Ming Jar...
Khang-hsi Vases, various
Stoneware Fish-bowl
Derby-Chelsea Figures: The Sailor and Hi- Las-
Leeds Tea and Coffee Set ...
Nankin Oviform Jars and Covers...
Sevres.
Ecuelle, with Cover and Stand...
Hard-paste Vases
Spode.
Tea Service
Writing Set
Worcester.
Cream-jug and Cover
Dessert Service
Sugar-basin and Cover
Relh s
Buonaparte. Joseph, King of Spain. ( Mass Beaker
taken from the Carriage of, after the Battle
of Vittoria, 1S13
Havward, Tom. Cricket Bat select. M U bearing
the Autographs of 66 famous Cricketers...
Man- Queen of Scots, Crystal Decanter of
Lock of Hair of ...
Stradivarius Violin ...
Sculpture.
Boehm, Sir J. Edgar. Terra-cotta Bust of I
McNeill Whistler
Bronze. Truth Killing Falsehood
Bronze Bust of a Faun. Louis X1Y
Figure. A Piping Faun. By Onslow
Whiting ...
Group. Two Bears Struggling. By J. M.
Swan
Knocker, Italian, Sixteenth Century
Marble Vase, French, Eighteenth Century-
Swan, J. M. Bronze Group of Two Beai
Struggling
Whistler, J. McNeill. Terra-cotta Bust of. By
Sir J. Edgar Boehm...
Whiting, Onslow. Bronze Figure of a Piping
Faun ...
Ml VI R.
Anne. Queen. Tankards ...
( harles 11. Porringer
Continental W ager Cup
|. U/.ili, than I igei ware Jug, with Silv<
Mounts
George I .
(aster.
Sha\ ing dish
Soap-box ...
, addy ...
t rei irge III.
Fluted Candlesticks, set oi lour...
Oval I 'i lies. 1782...
Plain rea-kettle ...
Sail . .ll.ii i, 1 '.111 "I
I ea ( addies
Two handled Cup and ( o\ er ...
'. -
1 75
11 1
1 11
"4
1 1 1
in
1 1 1
11 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
114
171
114
"4
£71
1-1
171
171
17 >
171
171
iH
171
11;
1 1 ;
1 1 ;
11 ;
11 ;
11 )
11 j
22;
113
n 1
Index
Silver — continued.
.hi
Muffineers, set oi three 1732
iii ci llai 1 29 ...
Xeapi 'i 1 1 - .Hid 1716
Georgian and William IV. Meat and Soup Plates
Set of ...
nan.
Silver-gilt Standing Cup and Cover, Sixteenth
Century
Tazza, Seventeenth Century
11--,
11--,
Silver — continued.
Irish.
Potato Rings, Eighteenth Century, Pair of ...
Silver-gilt Dishes [circa 1750), Pair of...
Italian Silver gill Dish, Seventeenth Century ...
Jacobean (lolilct
Perceval, Spencer, Silver Soup Tureen of, 1807...
Turner-ware Mug, Mounted with Silver Lip and
1 ' l\ IT ...
Tapestry.
Flemish Panel. Seventeenth Century
Spanish Panels, Two
"3
113
"3
113
113
I/O
I/O
DESIGN
BY J. OROZER, AFTER SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS
May, 1915.
Miscellaneous
w^
The History of the Glove
The earliest mention of the glove is in the
Old Testament, a Chaldean translation of the Book
of Ruth fin which the word "shoe'' is rendered
"glove") furnishing a reference to the prophet who
declared that he would "cast his shoe o'er Edom."
Accredited prophets, however, were not the only
I ( rsons to wear these ancient articles (if apparel, for,
according to the Jewish Talmud, the ordinary Chal-
deans first sported " the clothing of the hand " at
least a thousand years before the commencement of
the Christian era. This, at all events, is the opinion
ol the learned Casaubon, whose searching enquiries
have been conducted with a thoroughness which is
almost without a parallel. Nearly a century after
the Book of Ruth was written. Homer tells how he
By George Cecil
tound Laertes, the agriculturist, wearing gloves
working in the garden in order that the thorns might
not pierce his tender skin, while those used b)
wi re composed of seven folds of the thickest bull's
hide, sewn and stiffened with knots of lead .mil iron.
Virgil describing them as follows: —
" Obstupuere animi : tanlorumingeiilia seplem,
a bourn phtmbo inserto, /,■;. ,/«/."
Zenophon (who had the courage ol his dislikes)
declared that "the ancient Persian.-, were effemina
because they gloried in their gloves. \.<rro. a 1 on-
temporary of Cicero, also has a word to say on the
subject, having placed it on record that the lingers
which pluck the olive should not be gloved, and
\T0, [.— PA] B in
V01 . M.ll. No. 165. \
. 1 1 \ I II-' I.N 1 1 I 1 1 1 . ■ . II . 11 I I , 1. • • 1 ED
1 in PROPERTY ''I MR. DAVID M. CI Rl I
The Connoisseur
NO. II. — PAIR OF SIXTEENTH-CENTURY STEEL GAUNTLETS, DAMASCENED WITH COLD AND SILVER
Pliny the younger narrates that his father's secretary
wore gloves for the pre-eminently commendable
purpose of keeping his fingers warm. The philoso-
pher Musonious, going to extremes, regarded them
as having a most corrupting influence, for in the early
days of Christianity he wrote : " It is shameful that
persons in perfect health should clothe their hands
with soft and hairy coverings." Nor must
mention of Athenasus's contribution to ancient fiction
be omitted. The accomplished raconteur speaks of
a certain horrid glutton who " always came to table
with gloves on his hands, that he might be able to
handle and eat the meat while hot. and devour more
than the rest of the company." Athenseus does not
inform posterity with what substance his friend's
throat was lined, or if the greedy person was merely
a human salamander.
Although in England gloves practically "came over
with the Conqueror," it was not until the Middle Ages
that they were in general use — when, in addition to
serving their purpose, they also figured as symbols.
The affronted knight's gauntlet, for instance, was
synonymous with his unstained honour, the " mailed
fist" consisting of a gauntlet which was adroitly
fashioned so that each finger had almost as much
freedom as if the hand was bare. Later, when ladies
took to wearing gloves, " squires of dames " and other
armoured gallants displayed the embroidered fal-lals
in their helmets. And woe betide the knight who
had the misfortune to be beaten in the conflict, or,
still greater calamity, to lose the gage d 'amour, for,
in addition to forfeiting his lady's favour, he in-
variably incurred the odium of the other knights,
who, looking upon defeat as tantamount to disgrace,
presumably expected both sides to win. There were,
however, worse things than losing the treasured keep-
sake. Highly placed misdemeanants, for example,
were divested of their gloves when deprived of their
office, the former being roughly removed by the
rude hands of a jeering varlet specially retained for
the purpose. An instance is furnished by the Earl
of Carlisle, a catif who, in the reign of Edward II..
held a traitorous correspondence with the marauding;
Scots, and was (very properly) sentenced to have
his weazand slit. Before mounting the straw-strewn
scaffold the disloyal scribe had a fine pair of glo\es
dragged off and trampled in the dust. Sometimes
the person about to be ungloved, instead of bowing
meekly to the frightful indignity, removing his glovi -.
cast them into the crowd with the loudly expressi d
wish that whoever caught them would avenge the
deed of dishonour. As a rule, however, the dis-
graced evil-doer submitted his hands to the unsym-
pathetic valet, or his neck to the executioner, without
a murmur. It may be noted that the ceremonv of
degradation did not always include the trampling in
The History of the Glove
\
the mud process, the gloves often
being transferred direct from the
wearer's white hands to the de-
spoiler's breeches-pocket.
Amongst others the murdered
Charles I. was allowed the privi-
lege of presenting his execution
gloves to a weeping gentleman
who attended him.
A typical pair of sixteenth-
century steel gauntlets is repro-
duced in No. i., and another in
No. ii., the former, which are the
property of Mr. David M. Currie,
being of Italian workmanship,
damascened with gold, while the
cuff of each is embossed with
the figure of a warrior, long
sword and shield in hand, stand-
ing between two bound captives
and trophies of arms. The other
pair, which are damascened with
military trophies, wreaths in
gold, palm branches, foliage,
and knots in gold and silver,
and lined with crimson silk em-
broidered with gold and silver
thread, are Spanish.
Gloves have also played their
part at the coronations of our
kings and queens, while up till
i.Sji, when George IV. was
crowned, it was customary for
the sovereign's champion to ap-
pear upon the scene, mounted
and fully armed, and to throw
down his glove, thus challenging
any bold person who chose to dispute the accession.
At the coronation of George II. the ceremony
was marked by an unusual incident, for a dark
stranger took up the challenge, and, announcing
himseif as the champion of the loose-living Pre-
tender, questioned the right of the House of I lain .\ i i
to the throne. The result of the rash intruder's inter-
ference is not mentioned in history. Judges, too,
gave an impetus to the glove trade ol former days,
for though their use was not permitted in court,
should the assize conclude without the death penalty
being ordered, the sheriffs were expected to pre-
sent the humane cadi with a pan ol gloves. When
Jeffreys— most brutal of all brutes, .mil, according to
< 'harles [I., having " more impudenci than ten carted
street-walkers" — dispensed injustice, gifts of this de-
scription were scarce ; hut in the reign of Henrj VIII.
) \
NO. III. — LINEN GLOVJ
they changed hands frequently.
Sir Thomas M ore. it is -aid-
reci ived a pair I rom .1 M rs.
Croaker, in token of her grati-
tude at winning a case which
learned Lord Chancellor
decided in the lady's favour.
" It would lie .1- 1:11-! j
ners,'' quoth the legal luminary,
"to forsake a gentlewoman's
gift, and I accept the gloves;
their lining you will be pleased
otherwise to bestow.'' The
" lining" consisted of forty angels
— a substantial sum in those
days. Gloves also played their
part at royal funerals, a writer ol
the twelfth century chroni>
the fact that Henry II. was bin ied
in a pair ; and upon the tombs
of King John and Edward I.
being opened, gloves were found
upon the hands.
Formerly, when the ministra
tions of the Church were 1 ai
out with great pomp and 1 1 1
mony, the pontifical glove was
included in the episcopal in-
signia. Indeed, the abbots who
flourished at the time of the
[ Council of Poitiers took then
\ dignity so seriously that tiny
\ commandeered the gloves to
which only highly placed clerics
were entitled — a breach ol de-
corum w hich wa s \ isitcd with
dire chastening. It maybenoted
that the regulations laid down by the Coum il oi .\i\.
a body of ecclesiastics holding sway in the ninth
century, were exceedingly strict: the august
ordained that the gloves worn by monks should
ol sheep-skin, and quite plain, while those intended
for the use of the higher grades mighl bi decorated
11, accordance with the rank of the pious wea
Apropos, the clerical glove, it is state. I by Surius that
when St. Gudula, the patroness of Brusseli
101 thinking to pray with rvour, the
priest who conducted thi service, hem!; moved
compassion, placed his gloves ol Office between tin
sainted woman's leet and the Cold, haul Stone Hour.
i ,11 atly affronted al the delicate attention, the
nant devol ptuouslyi mo iling high,
upon which they miraculously remained suspei
in the- air lor one hour.
The Connoisseur
No. IV. — EMBROIDERED MITTENS
It was not until the thirteenth century that ladies
took kindly to wearing gloves as part and parcel of
their scheme of adornment, though for some four
hundred years previous to this period the fingerless
variety had a certain vogue. Upon the introduc-
tion of the fingered kind, linen — oddly enough —
was the chosen material, the gloves reaching to the
elbow, thus foreshadowing the present fashion. Not
till Queen Elizabeth's time, however, did the ex-
jantly embroidered and richly gemmed variety-
capture woman's fleeting fancy. Perfumed gloves
also were then in great demand, history having it that
when the dressy sovereign visited Cambridge a local
ELIZABETHAN PERIOD
dignitary offered her "a paire of gloves, perfumed
and garnished with embroiderie and goldsmithe's
wourke. price 6os.v Not to be outdone by a mere
Cambridge citizen, Edward de Vere, seventeenth Earl
of Oxford, also rose gallantly to the occasion, for upon
the Royal lover of finery making it known that em-
broidered gloves found favour in her august -
the tactful peer presented the vain queen with so
beautiful a pair that she caused herself to be painted
in them. Indeed, Elizabeth's infatuation for gloves
almost amounted to a passion. Mercenary in other
respects, she would expend vast sums in gratifying
her fastidious taste, frequently wearing them when
T/ic History of the Glove
W
NO. V. - EMBRI UDERED GLOV]
performing upon the virginelle, or virginal, as thi
quaint musical instrument is better known. "Sin.
however, put them off," we are told by a humorous
contributor to the Court Journal ol 1830, "when she
wished to display her ait to excess, as was the ease
when she took care- that the Scotch Ambassador
should overhear her, ami whom she afterwards asked
if his mistress, Mary Stuart, could play or sing as
well." These sci nted gew-gaws, by tin- way. were
kept m special boxes; and a female official, subordi-
nate i" the mistress of the robes, and known as "the
mistress of the sweet coffers," had charge of the
odoriferous fal-lals. An example of the linen i;lo\c
to which reference has bee n made is shown in No. iii.,
those illustrated in Nos. iv. and v. being of the Eliza-
bethan period, fudging from the size of the linen
ELI7.ABE I II w PERIl • ]!
specimen, it must have been worn bv a woman with
abnormally large fingers. The linen is hand -n
and is cm on the cross, while the Stitching 1- verj
iin- and somewhat curious. Xo. iv. represents one
of a pair of mittens, the material being crimson velvet,
embroidered with gold and silver thread and --ilk.
while the cuff — of white satin is equally di 1 01 uivi
I h :e mittens were given by Queen Elizabeth t" hei
maid of honour, Margaret Edgcumb, wit. ol Sii
Edward Denny, Knight Banneret. The
duced in X". \. aic et light bri pv n leathi 1 with
gauntlets of white silk embroidered with
silks, silver-gilt, silver thread, strips and spangles, and
dged with silver-gill lai e. [ntei is the
la;, sixteenth -century embroid red ;love (tin
pert) ol Hen Spit; 1 1 to he seen in No. vi., while
No. VI.— LATE SIXTEENTH-CENTURY EMBROIDERED GLOVE
SPITZER COLLECTION
is
V
p
Q
D
-
0
—
2
O
D
H
2
f-
z
w
Ex]
H
2 X
W -/■.
J> ■-;
a -
j-. -
2
> w
<
U
s -
: 5
_ _•
_
. —
: c-
2 O
The Connoisseur
those illustrated in Nos. vii. and viii. are early seven-
teenth-century examples, one being of buff and the
other of white leather. The buff pair has the cuff
added, are the property of — or have been lent to—
the South Kensington Museum.
It should be noted that at this time perfumed
rX. — EMBROIDERED GLOVES GIVEN BY IAMES I.
TO SIR EDWARD IiKNNV
embroidered with silver - gilt and silver thread on
crimson silk, and in the white leather pair the simple
and effective pattern is worked in silver-gilt and silver
thread, red and blue silks, and spangles. All of the
above are English, a distinction which may also be
claimed for those reproduced in Nos. ix. and x., the
former being one of a pair given by James I. to Sir
Edward Denny, a descendant of the before-mentioned
knight. It is of leather embroidered with gold and
silver thread, having a cuff decorated with gold and
silver lace on a crimson silk ground and fringed in
the customary manner. The gift was made when Sir
Edward (who afterwards became Earl of Norwich)
acted as sheriff of Hertfordshire and received the
king on his arrival from Scotland. The leather glove
shown m Xo. \. is mid-seventeenth century, and is
embroidered with silver-gilt and silver thread and
coloured silks. Several of these specimens, it may be
gloves were frequently presented by the various bur-
sars of Oxford University to distinguished visitors.
In the bursar's book of 1556, for instance, may be
seen the entry, "Pro fumigatis chirothecics."
A number of historic gloves are — happily — pre-
served, amongst them being a fairly short-wristed
example worn by Mary, Queen of Scots, and now
reposing under a glass case at the Ashmoleai
Museum. A white leather one, which belonged to
Queen Elizabeth, is to be seen in the Bodleian
Library ; it has an elaborate design in gold thread,
an edging of yellow fringe, and a lining of drab silk.
while the dimensions are so generous that they posi-
tively put to shame the servile flattery of time-serving
courtiers — who never lost an opportunity of praising
the alleged lilliputian proportions of the Royal hands.
Amongst the Ashmolean Museum treasures mention
may also be made of the Henrj VIII. hawking glove,
GEORGIAXA DUCHESS OF DEVONSHIRE
BY SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS
In the collection of Etirl Spencer, K.G., at Althorfi
CccwcMisi
The History of the {'-love
from the shape of which it is evident that the sports-
man-monarch possessed short and dumpty digits, and
of the pair worn by Shakespeare and presented to
Garrick by the Mayor and Corporation of Stratford-
on-Avon. Thesi glovi are in the possession of Miss
Frances B( nson. It should be pointed out that with
thi advi in of the Georges the decorative glow- with
the long wrist, beloved by Queen Anne and her court.
began to lose favour; and when the Prince Regent
spent sleepless nights and long days in a fruitless en-
deavour to cut out poor Beau Brummel as an arbiter
itiarum, the evolution had reached a point which
differs little from the present fashion. Indeed, the
gloves used by George IV. and " Perdita " bore a close
resemblance to the variety which is in vogue to-day.
There are many ancient customs connected with
the history of the glove. Hoydenish damsels who
sat on the table might be kissed, or pay forfeit with
a pair of gloves; and a commoner who dared enter
tiie st a I iles of a German or French nobleman without
removing his gloves either handed the offending
articles of attire to the grinning groom or subn
to a tine. In different parts ol El -<'pe the transfer
of land was accompanied by baring the hands, while
in several English country towns the authorities
announced the fair by hoisting on a tall, decorated
pole an immense glove, carrying it through
thoroughfare. It also was customary for km
send a glove as a sign-manual when assenting to a
request.
» 1
1
NO. X. MID-SI [-CENTURY LKATI
WITH SILVER rilREAI) VND COI.Ol REIl SII.KS
1 i
4
i
>j^WKW.5'
4^
. i
V
iL
No. I.— MANTELPIECE IN "CHIPPENDALE ROCOCO," IN CARVED PINE
FROM WINCHESTER HOUSE,' PUTNEY, 1750-60
14
The Years of Mahogany Part XI. The Director
Chippendale Chair By Haldane Macfall
Let us glance over the Director, first noticing
the general differences of the three editions.
The first edition, published on the 23rd of March,
1 754, with a list of 312 subscribers, contains nominally
160 plates: but as plate xxv. is twice employed, it
contains really 161 plates. It cost £2 8s.
The second edition, published in 1759. was exactly
like the first, except for
unimportant details on
title-page and the like.
It cost ^3, or 3 guineas.
The third edition,
published in 1702. was
much altered in its pre-
face ; several plates
disappear: and it is
illustrated now with a
reputed 200 plates ; but
as plates 25, 36, 45- 4').
6/, 6§, 153. 159- l67,
171, 179, and 187 are re-
peated numbers, it really
contained 212 plates.
It cost ,£3 13s. 6d., or
\\ guineas.
NOW to get tO what
the first edition of the
/>.■,, tor has to tell us
of Chippendale's design.
First of all. sitting aside
the "live orders of an hi-
tecture " — his Tuscan,
1 )oric,Ionic, Corinthian,
and ( Composite — which
arc: the clap-trap of
tin- time, except lor the
fact that it points to the
1 rafl smen 1 onsi dering ■ irdin \ry u
architecture as the background of their intention, we
come to a sort of basic design of a chair with much
talk of perspective — a plate that has never received
the attention it deserves. This shows in a perspective
kev that Chippendale looks at the foundation of a
chair as rectangular in the back-rest, that the splat 111
the back is founded upon a flat-vase shape, that the
legs as seen from the
front are straight ami
rectangular : whilst we
see also, sideways, how
the back of the seal
rakes up and away from
the perpendicular, like-
wise that the ball legs
rake down and away
from the perpendicular,
but that the front legs
stand 111 tin- perpendicu-
lar. Then to this basic
i dea of the cha i r he
brings t he elegam < ol
his design, and he shows
his mind worki ng 1 iUt
an elaborate pattern
within the basic outlines
of his foundations— the
I,.]. iail of tin' bai k takes
on tin cupid's bow ; the
splat i s pi erced and
1 arved a Is.,, that is to
say, the design of the
splat is contained within
lb, OUtlin e ot a vase.
pierced 01 carvi
plain "a< cording to
tasti at d the straight
PENDALE CHAIR FOI , . ,
be, 175 leSs have stretchers '"'
The Connoisseur
No. III. — CHIPPENDALE CHAIR OF I75O-60,
WITH "RABBETED" SEAT FRAME
strength. The seat drops into the seat frame. All this
is particularly instructive, since we are to see the cabriole
Ax give way largely during this decade of /~jo 60 to
the straight square leg, and with this Ax the banished
stretcher is to return and take possession of the chair.
Then in this first edition, which gives us Chippen-
dale's ideas in 1754, we find the designs of chairs
on fourteen plates: and it is worth noting (1) that
plates xii. to xv. show three chairs to the plate, in
all twelve of what he simply calls "chairs" : (2) the
next plate, xvi., shows three " ribband-back chairs " ;
(3) the next four plates, xvii. to xx., show his so-
called "French chairs," but in these, as we shall see,
are three very distinct and different types: (4) the
next two plates, xxi. and xxii., show "Gothic/; chairs" ;
and (5) the remaining three, plates xxiii. to xxv..
show " Chinese chairs."
So that we have seven very marked styles of chairs:
if we add the "ladderbacks," which he made but did
not illustrate, we have eight types in this decade. We
can do worse than take these chairs in Chippendale's
order.
But let us note as we go that Chippendale con-
stantly reminds his patron that his design need not
be carved so elaborately as the pattern, as the plain
NO. IV. -CHIPPENDALE ARMCHAIR OF 1750-60,
WITH " R W.VV. I ED " SEAT I- K Wll.
design will hold the innate grace of the pattern — in
other words, he is all the while making the more
elaborate chairs for the nobility and gentry, and
the plainer chairs for the solid, well-to-do middle
class. Not only so, not only does he cater for all
classes, but he designs with eye to the sort of use
to which the chair is to be put. The dining-room
1 hairs, — or, as he puts it, "fit for Eating- Parlours "-
were evidently leather-seated by preference ; whilst
of his "Chinese'' chairs he tells us that they had
" commonly cane bottoms with loose cushions,'' but
could have " Stuffed Seats and Brass Nails," and he
considers them " very proper for a Lady's dressing
room" (which, be it remembered, was in the seven-
teen-hundreds largely her drawing-room) — "especially
if hung with India paper." And it should also be
noted that he definitely lays down the rule of the
brass-nailed seats (that is to say. upholstered seats
that are nailed to the woodwork) being of the same
material and colour as the curtains. Whilst in his
"French" chairs, as we shall presently see. whereby
he evidently meant the upholstered back and seat
with carved framing woodwork, the fabric should be
tapestry "or other needlework." He also gives in
the third edition designs of chairs with wooden seats
in
The Years of Mahogany
No. V. MAHOGANY CHIPPENDALE CHAIR 01 L750-60,
\VI I !I "SI I'll ED SEAT" \M> " A.NGL] BRACKETS" I"
LEGS FROM nil: COLLECTION "1- 5IR EDMUND
HI IPE VERNEY, I. Ml.
for •"halls, passages, ami summer-houses,' but this in
another story. And another fact which emerges and
is repeatedly insisted upon by Chippendale is his lure
to his patron that he is great on "variety" — which
is to say that he is no purist, but will give you a
French leg to a Chinese body that is not innocent ol
" ( lothick " intention !
So far, in Chippendale's own hand, he wrote down
lor us his intention and his " taste. ' Let us see, in the
designs he approved, what new lorms he gave to the
chairs of 1750 60. We must not be confused, however,
by the fact that Chippendale show on each drawing
of a chair different legs and differ nl 1 arvings, not as a
part of his infinite "variety,'' but to give a 1 I to
his patrons. The same caution holds as n gards the
variants in the carving and dei oration, even sometimes
of the actual form, of the two sides ol the (hair.
Let us then to the Chippendale Director chairs,
disregarding all othei furniture.
NO. V] 1 llll'llMi \I I VRM CHAIR Ol I75O-60, WITH
'• I I 1 I I I II
FROM I UK COLLECTION ' 'I SIR SPENCER PONSONBY-
FANE, K.C.B.
First, the Chippendale "chairs" of the type from
thedecadeih.il goes before show more slenderness,
Imi continue the elaborately carved < lipid's -bow top-
rail and splat: whilst the upholstered seat is n
with brass nails in one or two r.m . -1 in a pattern to
mutate the design oi .1 fret, as Chippendali lays down,
liut it is necessary to note that whilst Chippendale
still largely employed the claw-and-ball foot to the
carved cabriole legs of his nice 1 laborat 1 hail
Director does not give one instance of it, but tends
towards the cabriole h 2 1 nding in the French scroll !
Evidently the claw-and ball was nol the latest tl
In fact, it does not appeal cither in Chippendale's
noi in any other maker's books of published designs
ol this age ; yet we find that in prai nee it was widely
Hen in th e chairs 1" poinl - out that, without
1 an ing, a g 1 workman can still 1
his design. And it is ol these chairs that he speaks
The Connoisseur
NO. VII. — CHIPPENDALE CHAIR OF 1750-60,
SHOWING THE COMING OF THE RIBBAND-BACK
as being "stuffed," with covering of the same colour
and material as the curtains. It is noteworthy that
Chippendale does not call these chairs "French
chairs," though the French influence of Louis XV. is
quite pronounced in the legs ! By "French chairs,"
as we shall see, he meant a very markedly different
thing.
As regards actual development — true evolution —
we ought to consider the famous " ribband-back "
Chippendale chair, which is but the perfecting and
climax of the cupid's-bow Chippendale of this decade,
made for his more illustrious and wealthier patrons ;
indeed, it comes next in order in the Director. But
before doing so we must look at his work as a whole.
There is one development in all types of Chippen-
dale chairs of this Director decade which is very
remarkable — we find everyone of the types which we
are about to consider being made with the straight leg.
And it should be particularly noted, to save confusion,
that all the several styles were much mingled ; yet this,
once grasped, nevertheless helps us to place the date
No. VIII. — WALNUl CHIPPENDALE CHAIR OF 1750-60,
SHOWING FURTHER DEVELOPMENT TOWARDS THE RIBBAND-
BACK IN THE POSSESSION OF THE DRAPERS' COMPANY
of the chair in its decade. The cabriole leg continues
in the more expensive and very elaborately carved
forms all the time, 'tis true ; but the straight leg came
so much into the vogue that it dominates the type of
the decade — and even the most elaborate " ribband-
backs " were often set on the plain, straight square
leg. To understand precisely what led to this sudden
vogue we must just for a moment drag the two crazes
for the "Gothick"and the "Chinese" out of their
order. The "Gothick" and "Chinese" had come
upon the town, and in examining both crazes in their
order, we shall be struck by the fact that the "Chinese
taste " undoubtedly had much to do with the creation
of the French "rococo" under Meissonier — a rococo
that bears no relation to the rococo of the Italian
after-Renaissance, but which invaded London about
the mid-century, and upon the graceful curves and
fantasies of which we shall see Chippendale fastening
with eagerness, and out of it creating the style which
above all others is associated with his name — chiefly
probably on account of his famous mirrors.
18
The ) 'cars of Mahogany
NO. IX. — CHIPPENDALE RIBBAND-BACK CHAIR
OF 1750-60
The "Gothick" and "Chinese'' with the French
"rococo" being the basic cause of the wide changes
wrought in Chippendale's design at the mid-century,
it is necessary here to notice that the essential cupid's-
bow Chippendale chair took on, instead of the
cabriole leg with its claw-and-ball foot or club foot,
a straight square leg, mostly quite plain. That this
straight square leg came in two or three years before
the publication of the Director is certain — we have the
same bark designs bearing both the 1 abi iole and tin-
straight leg. Indeed, except when we get the straight
leg, the types of the chair-backs of the ordinary
( 'hippendale chair are so close to those oi the decadi
that went before (1740-50) that it must ever remain
largely but guesswork a^ to which of these ordinary
chairs belong to the Director decade of [750-60, and
which to the decade before, except thai slenderm
increases and the carving is more graceful and
delicate, whilst a certain sign of the Director decadi
is the beautiful "applied fret" carving to the fronl
Nn. X. -CHIPPENDALE RIBBAND-BACK CHAIR OF 1750-60
IN THE POSSESSION OF IIIF. EAR] . IN IKY
of the seat-rail or to the uprights of the back ; also
any suggestion in the tracery of the stonework of a
Gothic window in the pierced ami carved splat makes
it .1 certain product of the Directordeca.de, for n
that we will presently see. The dolphin foot is also
of the Director decade, coming in, it is said, about
1755 (the latter half of it l, though I have ne\ i
hail any proof of this, and see no reason for il
being done from i 750.
The second i) pe of Chippendale chair of the Director
decade i^ the "ribband-back" chair, in which we
arrive at the achievement ol Chippendale's supreme
intention ol grace and variety ' ful pattern and
exquisite carving, for the --eat of the ribband-back
he decides the best to be red moi Now the
ribband-back developed perfectly naturally out of
ypical Chippendale cupid's-bow chair of the
preceding de< ade, ami thi iccenl ol ', :n Ann,
is still over it. This chair, the supreme effort ol
Chippendale's genius, is naturally the rarest. It-
to
The Connoisseur
cost must have been very great. A fine ribband-
back, with its exquisitely carved seat-rail at the edge
ol the rebate where the seat drops in, and its finely
marked than in tile fact that, whilst lie made his best
pieces with the claw-and-ball, he drew them without ;
but it is also significant in that he decided that his
NO. XI.— THE MAHOGANY CHIPPENDALE "1-1;
AN INN OF CHANCERY, NEWCAST1
i arved gadroon edge beneath, with its richly wrought
cabriole leg and claw-and-ball foot, with the delicate
tracery and carving of the back, is a triumph of
strength united with beauty of design such as worthily
crowned the achievement of a man who was soon to
be elected to the Society of Arts. Now the difference
between the Thomas Chippendale of the Director and
the Thomas Chippendale of practice is nowhere more
l.N. ll . HAIR OF THE PRESIDES! OF LYONS INN.
E STREET, STRAND, LONDON, 1750-60
ribband-backs should be seated with red morocco,
for Cescinsky tells how, after careful examination, he-
has never vet found such a chair seated with red
morocco, nor with any sign of the close-nailing that
was an essential at this time for holding down red
morocco. And I can remember a great house in the
North where I spent more than one happy day in my
youth, where there were not only the original accounts
The Years of Mahogany
from Chippendale still to be seen in their faded
slender scrawl, but when- there must have been at
leasl three or four dozen of these superb ribband-
in order in Chippendale- book makes it certain
that they were being made from about 1750. It is
worth noting that in the first edition ol the Director
No. XII. CHIPPENDAI.1 "FRENCH CHAIR" OF 17SO-60 IN MIE POSSESSION Ol ITIONI
back chairs put away in the upper rooms because
of a loose Or broken leg, or some such defect. But
1 have no recollection of any single one ol them
having had a red morocco :eat; indeed, most ol
them had rich silken seats of a deep crimson clour.
However, the facl remains that the creator of them
considered that red morocco was theil ideal seating.
It may lie taken as certain thai most ribband-backs
belong to the latter half of the Director decad
(1755 60), and would perhaps be better dated al
1755 r,5 • but the mere fact thai the] '-'11 in
of 1754. one plate, numbered x\i.. is given to the
ribband-back, showing three chairs, all ol which an
cabriole-legged in the " French 1
The third type "i Chippendale's chairs he calls
■■ French chairs."
We have seen the square, pomp
Louis XIV. driven oul ol fiance bj the "elegance
..I the Regent, whose ht in the
slender gn I the taste ol Louis XV.'s long
reign.
By •■ I n in I' 1 hail I hippend lie clearl; did not
The Connoisseur
NO. XIII.— CHIPPENDALE "FRENCH CHAIR" OF 1750-60
IN HIE POSSESSION OF THE IRONMONGERS' COMPANY
mean the graceful cabriole leg of the Louis XV.
"taste," which had already long influenced his de-
sign, but seems to have applied the term to such
chairs as had the typical French form of the up-
holsterer's oval or rounded back contained within a
carved framework, with an upholstered seat also
carved as to its framework. This chair he clearly
especiallv designed for drawing-rooms or reception-
rooms : and he definitely says that the coverings
should be damask, leather, "tapestry, or other
needlework." In fact, the Director would seem to
make it evident that all upholstered chairs with
framings of carved woodwork were the "French
taste" in Chippendale's eyes. For, if we glance at
the plates in the first edition which he labels as
"French chairs" (the four plates xvii., xviii., xix.,
and xx.), we find that there are three types.
(1) There is the typical "Louis XV." chair, as
we now call it, in which the back is an upholstered
(or "stuffed") oval or round or square with rounded
No. XIV. — CHIPPENDALE "STUFFED CHAIR" OF 1750-60,
SHOWING THE "DOLPHIN LEGS"
corners. These "stuffed" backs are framed in carved
woodwork, which joins them to the seating part of
the chair with carved "uprights," leaving an open
space between the back and the seat ; whilst the
"stuffed" seat has its carved framework, which is
legged with carved cabriole legs ending in carved
scroll French feet. This "French" Louis XV. chair
remained the "drawing-room chair" into our own day.
(2) There is the halfway upholstered chair from our
old English "grandfather" to this French "Louis XV.."
in which the "stuffed" back and seat meet without
open space between ; but the upholstered back is
framed with carved woodwork like the seat, the legs
being carved cabrioles with French scroll feet. This
chair is simply a development of the stuffed "grand-
father" that we have had from Queen Anne's days,
through the "lion mahogany" onwards, of which the
Percival Griffiths collection shows such fine examples,
which will be familiar to my readers.
(3) Then we have what is usually looked upon as
The Years of Mahogany
NO. XV. — WALNUT CHIPPENDALE "STUFFED CHAIR" OF
1750 60. SHOWING ANGLE BRACKETS TO LEGS
IN THE POSSESSION OF MK EDMUND HOPE VERNEY, BART.
the Chippendale " stuffed " chair, in which the stuffed
back and seat meet without open space between, the
top of the back usually " shaped" in the cupid's-bow
wave, the carved arms stuffed. The legs, when straight
legs, are stretchered. Usually the more important
pieces have carved cabriole legs.
But — and note this well — in all these "stuffed"
chairs the carving of the woodwork, wheresoever there
is carved woodwork, is always either markedly "rococo"
or the beautiful low-reliefed "applied lattice-fret," or.
as it is technically called, " card-cut," which we are
about to see as coming from the "Chinese taste."
Before leaving the three types of " stuffed " chairs
which Chippendale clearly considered the essential
" French chair," it is well here to touch upon the
development of the English "Queen Anne grand
lather" or " cosv " chair of this decade. Chippendal
reduces its size considerably during the decade, and
makes its carved legs more slender; whilst we find
the straight leg being freely used. But the "square
back" must not be taken to mean a straight line to
the top of the chair, which, as a matter of fact, usually
follows the curves of the Chippendale " cupid's-bow "
line.
The upholstered (or "stuffed") stoolsalsotookon the
straight leg. Indeed, the straight-legged Chippendale
No. XVI.— CHIPPENDALE " STI Ml!' ARMCHAIR
of 1750-60
I- Ri im I III-. LONG GAL] ERY M HAM II' 'I SE
•'square-back" stuffed (hair remained the ordinary
easy-chair of 1750 to 1760.
When you get the Chippendale " stuffed " chairs
(or " French chairs") in "a set of three ''—armchair,
armless chair, and stool — you have probably got .1
Chippendale "day-bed'' or "chaire long," for they
were made to put together as such, a very favourite
use in France even down to our own day, and a most
useful arrangement.
Needlework was now rarel) used, these "stuffed
chairs being almost invariabu 1 overed with damask.
I give as illustrations to help the student, tn
frontispiei e, .1 superb example of typical Chippendali
"1 co curving in a mantelpiece of superb di ligfl
from VVinchestei House, Putney, made of carved pine.
This is a magnificent example of what is meant by
"Chippendale rococo," and gives the typed design
which to the ordinary man used to mean "Chi]
dale." As to the origin of " Chippendale 1 o,' I
shall have more to say in the next article. I would
only point out that it hears no relation to the " ro<
ol tli-' Italian design alter the Renaissance. The
chairs show the ordinary Chippendale, the "ribband-
hack," four so-called "state chairs," giving typi
thi more elaborate " French chairs," and two ordinary
" stuffed " or upholstered chairs
z
<
z
<
z
z
^ .
WHAT YOU WILL
BY AM) UTKR .1. R. SMITH
On the Collecting of War Medals
Part II.
By W. E. Gray
The Punjab campaign in 18411 was rewarded
by a handsome medal of the usual size — obverse, head
of the Queen; reverse, a fine representation of the
Sikhs laving down their arms to the victorious general,
the British army being drawn up in the background.
The ribbon is dark blue, with yellow edges. There
are three clasps, two being the most to one medal,
ombinations issued being six.
The medal for the New Zealand war 1 1845 47 ) diffei -
from others by having the year of the campaign on
the reverse, within a wreath : and on the obverse is
the head of the Queen, with crown and veil. The
same medal was used for the New Zealand war ol
1860-66. Ribbon dark blue, with broad crimson
down centre.
In 184- Her Majesty commanded that the services
of those veterans who had fought in the great wars of
1804-14 and in Egypt (1801) should be recognised
by the bestowal of a medal for their services rendered
to Her Majesty's predecessors. The medal, which
was designed by Mr. Wyon, was struck at the Mint,
and is known as the Military General Service Medal.
On the obverse is the head of the Queen crowned,
and date 1S4S: on the reverse, the Queen in tin ai 1
df crowning with laurel the Duke of Wellington as
representing the Army ; the great warrior, in full uni-
form and wearing his decorations, is kneeling to receive
the reward. The medal is tile usual [f-inch si/,', the
ribbon crimson, with blue edges, 1] in. wide. The
numbi r of clasps issued was twenty-nine, and the com
binations are practically endless, as although nearly
fifty years had elapsed since some ol tin ei ag< ments,
ii< arly twenty thousand claimants proved their claim to
rea ive it. The greatest number of clasps given with
any one medal was fifteen ; tor this number there were
six applicants, but only two established thi ii 1 laim.
The great services of the Navy were a! nised,
the survivors of that great period in the history of the
Kriusli Navy, 1795 181(1. receiving the handsome
Naval General Service Medal. The medal has the
same obverse as the one issued to the Army : on the
nwerse is Britannia seated on a sea-horse, in her
right hand a trident, in her left an olive branch.
The ribbon is white, with blue borders. The clasps
are similar in size to those of the Military General
Service Medal, and are over 230 in number. They
represent general engagements, engagements between
single ships, and a very interesting series for boat
actions, these latter being awarded only to those
actually engaged with the boats. More than twenty
thousand old sailors established their claim to the
medal, five clasps being the greatest number given
with any one medal. I have an interesting case in
my collection of one man receiving two medals of this
series, one with three clasps and another with one.
The stirring events in India (171)9 1826)
followed also bya late distribution of medals in 1851.
on similar lines to those of the Army and Navy in
1848. The medal was worn from a pale blue ribbon,
and has the same head of Her Majesty on tin 1 ib\
un the reverse is a figure ofVii 'em' seated, in her left
hand a wreath, in her right an olive branch, Oriental
ery being in thi and. Twenty-one clasps
were issued to this medal, live being tin gn
number to one medal.
These three retrospective medals an t the
most beautiful of the many tine spei tmens of the
die-sinker's art issued during thi il her late
Majesty. The numbers issued are so large, the
vai iet) of clasps and combinai 1 0 reat, thai
three series alone offei the collectoi a practically in
exhaustible field in win- h to rcise his talent ' >
I the naval clasps only two were issu, ,
others only three, lour, and s,, on : SO thai a collector
must often wait vears b ong-desired clasp is
obtainable, and even then the competition to obtain
it is great, and the prices run high.
These medals a,,- 1 agi rlydi ired ■■ ■< 0 I ■ ■ ei
and usually form thi backbone of the collection.
Many havi been absorbed in well known 1
27
The Connoisseur
others are highly prized by the families of the re-
cipients, and, no doubt, many have been lost or
melted for the value of the silver in the early days
before collecting them was begun.
The medals for the Crimea and the Indian Mutiny
are more familiar, from the fact that we have a great
number of the brave men who earned them still
amongst us. The clasp of the Crimean medal is very
striking, being in the form of oak leaves and acorns.
The clasps are five in number, and the combinations
are twenty-two. The ribbon is light blue, with yellow
edges. A special medal was issued to the Navy for
services in the Baltic. Medals were also bestowed
by the Emperor of the French, the King of Sardinia,
and the Sultan of Turkey.
The Indian Mutiny medal is one highly prized by
the collector, and is one of the most striking in design.
The ribbon is white, with red edges and stripes. The
number of clasps issued was five. Four is the greatest
number to one medal. Only a few men in the Bengal
Artillery are entitled to this number. The total com-
bination of the clasps of this medal is sixteen. This
medal to the Naval Brigade is most rare. The war
in China (1857-60) was marked by the renewal of
the medal of 1S42 without the date, but with clasps.
These are six in number, and the combinations are
very great. Medals with five clasps are occasionally
met with.
The medal for the South African wars (1877-80)
is the same as that issued in 1853, without the date
in the exergue. There is only one clasp to this medal,
which bears the years of the campaign in which the
recipient was engaged.
The Indian General Service Medal was in use from
1S52 to 1895. The first clasp is Pegu, the last Jl'azi-
ristan, 1894-95. The clasps issued number twenty-
one, and the combinations are endless. Seven clasps
to one medal is the greatest number, General Sir
William Lockhart having this number.
The design of the medal for Ashantee (1873-74) is
a most striking one, being by Sir Joseph Poynter, P.R.A.
Obverse, head of the queen, with diadem and veil ;
the reverse, a fine representation of a fight with
natives in the bush. The ribbon is yellow, with black
stripes. One clasp only — Cooinassie — was issued to
this medal. It has since been adopted as the African
General Service Medal, and has had twenty-one clasps
issued to it. Medals with four clasps are occasionally
met with. The medal for the war in Afghanistan
(1S77-80) is still often seen, as is also the bronze
■•tar for the celebrated march of Lord Roberts from
Kabul to Kandahar, which is worn from the brilliant
rainbow - pattern ribbon, as in the early Afghan
1 ampaigns. The clasps are six in number, and the
combinations are twenty-four. The blue and white
striped ribbon of the Egyptian wars (1882-89) >s s"
familiar that little description of it is needed. The
clasps issued are ten in number, and the combinations
seem without end. I know of eighty-six, and one
often comes across fresh ones. One medal was issued
with seven clasps ; four with six. With these excep-
tions, five clasps is the greatest number to this medal.
The Khedive of Egypt also gave a bronze star to each
recipient of the Egyptian war medal. The number
of medals issued for these campaigns was very great,
being only exceeded by those of the Boer war.
In 1885 a medal with and without clasps was issued
for the rebellion in North-West Canada. In 1900 a
retrospective medal was granted for the Fenian raids
of 1S66 and 1870, and the Red River expedition
(1870). A change from the usual circular silver medal
was made by the issue for the Ashanti expedition of
1895-96 of a four-pointed bronze star with the St.
Andrew's cross between the arms. In the centre is
a crown, with Ashanti above and date 1896 below:
on the reverse is From the Queen. They were issued
without name, and as they can be bought from the
makers for a few shillings, they are of little value to
the collector.
The New Indian General Service Medal was first
issued for the Chitral campaign, and was also made
use of for the subsequent North-West Frontier wars :
the total number of clasps issued was six. The Indian
General Service medals are also issued in bronze, and
with clasps, to the camp followers.
The Chartered Company of South Africa was per-
mitted to issue in 1896 a handsome silver medal for
the fighting in Matabeleland, i8q6 : Rhodesia, 1896 ;
Mashonaland, 189J.
The British troops engaged in the Soudan in 1896
also received an English medal as well as that ot the
Khedive.
The medal for the last war in South Africa was of
the usual size, the clasps being neat and well made,
like those of the Military General Service Medal of
1849. The number of clasps officially sanctioned is
twenty-six, nine being the greatest number granted
to any one medal ; and as the number ot soldiers
in this war was greater than in any previous war in
which England had been engaged, this medal offers
a great opportunity to the collector of war medals —
it is said that about 180,000 of them were struck at
the Mint.
The last war medal to bear the image of Her Most
(Iracious Majesty Queen Victoria is that issued after
her death for the China Expedition, 1900: it is
similar to the one for the China Wars. 1S42 and
i860, except that the obverse bears the head of Her
2S
s.
Y.
O
<
(A
O
U
w
a
Y.
<
1/3
.J
<
Q
_
I
H
O
<
H
Y.
—
3
w
29
The Connoisseur
Majesty as on the South African medal. 1900 — three
clasps of neat design were issued to it.
The war medals issued during the reign of his late
\] sty King Edward VII. were not numerous, the
first being for the war in South Africa, 1901-2 ; two
clasps were issued, the ribbon being the same as the
:n's medal, 1900.
The medal for the expedition to Ashanti has only
one clasp, the ribbon being green, with black stripes.
The only other special war medal was that for Tibet :
' lasp was given, the ribbon being red with green
border, with two white stripes. The other medals and
clasps given during this reign were extensions of the
various colonial and Indian General Service Medals.
The most valued reward for bravery, both by the
soldiers and sailors themselves, and by the public.
is undoubtedly the Victoria Cross. It is of simple
bronze, in the form of a Maltese cross. On the
obverse is the British lion and crown, and on a scroll
underneath the words, "For Valour." A laureated
clasp, \\ inches wide, acts as suspender, and a " V "
ci nmects it with the cross. The reverse is plain. The
name and regiment of the recipient are engraved on
the lock of the clasp, and the date of the act of
bravery for which it was awarded is engraved in the
circle. The ribbon is red for the Army, blue for
the Navy. It carries an annuity of ^?io, and at the
discretion of the Secretary of State for War this may
be increased to ,£50 a year. Up to date about 500
of the Victoria Crosses have been awarded, 50 only
being to the Navy. This decoration is very highly
prized by the collector, and it is only on the death
of the recipient that they are to be obtained, and
even then with difficulty, as they are much valued by
the families of the brave men who earned them. It
was first instituted in 1856.
The medal for distinguished conduct in the field
was instituted in 1854. At first a gratuity was given
with the medal, but was withdrawn in 1862. The
ribbon is blue, with a crimson stripe down the centre.
The name, rank, and regiment are round the edge :
and since 1882 the date of action for which it was
awarded has been added.
A medal to the Navy for conspicuous gallantry
was issued in 1855. However, eight only were then
issued. It also carried a gratuity. The ribbon is
blue, with a white stripe down the centre. It was
revivi d in 1074, and is now granted for any war in
which the Navy is engaged. This medal may be
worn with the Victoria Cross. I have a group in
my collection consisting of the Victoria Cross, Con-
spicuous Gallantry (1st issue), Crimean Medal with
one clasp, Sebastopol, China Medal (1842), Legion
of Honour, and the Turkish Medal for the Crimea.
The collecting of regimental medals is a very inter-
esting branch. As these medals were discontinued
after the issue of the long service and good conduct
medal in 1830, they have now become rare and
difficult to obtain. Another very interesting branch
is that of early volunteer medal- given to the
numerous volunteer corps raised from 1794 to 1804.
They vary in shape and size. Some are .struck, many
engraved and bearing the hall-mark of the period.
Mr. R. Day, of Cork, who is an authority on the
subject, has made a special study of these medals,
and had a fine collection of them.
The very fine series of medals in gold and silver
granted by the H.E.I.C. also claims the attention of
the medal collector, as does that of the handsome
medals presented to Indian chiefs from the time of
George II. to Queen Victoria.
Occasionally collections are disposed of, and oppor-
tunities occur of completing a series, or of obtaining
a rare example : but in spite of sales being held
monthly by Glendining's and Debenham's, and occa-
sionally during the season by Sotheby's or Christie'-,
the older medals are becoming more difficult to obtain.
For rare ones and fine groups very high prices have
to be paid.
The great advantage that war-medal collecting has
over any other pursuit is that, however great the issue
of a medal may be, it is strictly limited, and is never
repeated. Each medal bears the name, rank, and
regiment of the soldier or sailor who earned it, and
a record is kept at the War Office and Admiralty
of every medal and clasp issued.
This hobby is also free from fraud, as the only way
in which a collector can be deceived is by the taking
from or adding to the clasps of a medal. In the case
of rare or valuable medals enquiries can be made,
and the medal and clasps can be verified and found
if correct or not. The medal itself cannot be imitated,
and bogus clasps are easily detected. Some tim<
the Indian Mint issued, on application, re-strikes of
some of the early H.E.I.C.'s medals, but that has
now been stopped.
The collection of General Eaton is considered the
most complete, and contains a great number of naval
and military General Service medals. Colonel Mur-
ray's fine collection contains many obtained with rare-
judgment bv Captain Tancred, who is the author of
the standard work on war medals and decorations.
Captain Whittaker's collection is strong in gold medals
and crosses, that of Dr. Payne in officers' medals and
groups ; my own in Victoria Crosses, rare groups,
and H.E.I.C.'s medals. Major Tombs, Mr. Gaskell,
and others have also representative collections, and
the number of collections is constantly on the inci easi
[The Editor invites the assistance of readers of THE CONNOISSEUR who may be able to impart the information required by Correspondents.
Last month's instalment of "Notes and Queries" introduced a remarkable case of identification to our readers.
The two paintings reproduced side by sale on page 211, the original portrait of Jules II. Forget, 1779, and the copy made
for another branch of the family, must havt attracted no little attention from art-lovers. Apart from the general
interest, moreover, it tonus an excellent proof of the value of " Notes and Queries " as a medium of identification.
for The Connoisseur reaches collectors all over the world, who are thus put into communication with each other,
often with astonishing effect. Owners of doubtful pictures have resorted to " Notes and Querit s " as a last r, source of
identification, and if the painting has any appreciable interest attaching to it. the desired information is almost
bound to be elicited sooner or later. Many connoisseurs of high rani;, and in the possession of the finest collections,
write to us giving their assistance, which, of course, can hardly be overestimated. Readers will recoil, i t. foi ins,
the case of a miniature in our August issue for 1914, winch II, r Majesty the Illicit identified as being a pert rait of the
Old Chevalier. We are glad to say, moreover, that those who have exhibited their pictures in thesi columns express
their satisfaction at the method of reproduction. A recent letter from a client in America says, " / wish to tell you
how much I liked the way you handle,/ my portrait : the cut was splendid. I thank you."
There is one point, perhaps, -which ice should like to draw attention to. " Notes and Queries " is not necessarily
restricted to the reproduction of unidentified paintings or engravings. We are prepared to include specimens of rare
or unique china, etc.. etc.. at the usual rate of 10s. 6d. per photograph, provided, of course, that the objects have m, I
than /list the ordinary interest connected with them. The decision on this point rests, of course, with THE CoKKOlSSEI R
I' MM N I II II I i
Portrait
(No. 174)-
I Iear Sir, —
I am a regular
subscriber to
your magazine,
and want to
ask a favour of
y o u . la m
encl o s i ng a
photograph I
have had taken
of an oil-paint-
i n g i n m v
possession,
and am very
anxious to
know whether
it is authenl ii .
and, if possible,
theartist. The
canvas is
approximat ely
58 in. by .(2
in. The 1 olour-
ings are very
rich and mel-
lowed : canvas
and si 1 etchei
are undoubted-
ly old. I shall
be exi remely
(■74)
1 \IHKN 1 IFIED PORTRA1 I
indebted to you
for any enlight-
enment. As
suring you of
my sincere ap-
preciation,
I am,
Very truly
yours,
I'. HOPKINSON-
K\ ANS
( Philadelphia,
U.S. A.).
L'mI'KN 1 ii Hi'
P MINTING
(NO. ion 1.
April, mi \.
1 >EAR Sir.
I 1 a k e this
5t oppor-
tunity "I sub-
mitting partic-
ulars which
may he of in-
to your
corn
upon painting
No. 10(1
Tribute 1
— illustrated
in N o
VND Ql 11:11-
The Connoisseur
of April. 11)14. I
have in my posses-
sion an oil-painting
on panel, 13A in. by
io{ in., the compo-
sition of which is
almost identical with
the illustration re-
ferred to, except that
the arrangement is
reverse -handed ; the
figure of Christ is in
a different aspect :
the expressions and
costumes vary slight-
ly. The portraiture,
however, appears to
correspond through-
out. My picture is
perfectly finished and
of rich, dark tone.
It is attributed to
jordaens.
I am,
Yours faithfully,
J. H. Denty.
Unidentified
Painting
(No. 175).
Dear Sir, — I have
sent you a photo of
a most interesting
old oil-painting in
my possession, in
the hope that you
will be able to repro-
duce it under your
Notes and Queries
section. I should be
extremely obliged if
vou or one of your
numerous readers
eould inform me who
the artist is and the
name of the lady who
forms the subject of
the painting. It
measures 1 6 i n. by
ni in., and is on
panel. I am inclined
to think it is by Hol-
bein, or possibly pre-
Holbein,as the period
(175) unidentified painting
(176) unidentified portrait
32
is not later than early
sixteenth century. I
have the original
carved and gilt frame,
which is not shown.
Trusting that you will
be able to assist me
in this matter,
Believe me,
Yours faithfully,
Cecil B. Morgan.
Unidentified
Portrait
(No. 176).
Dear Sir, — I
should be pleased
to hear from any of
vour readers as to
the identity and
authorship of the
portrait, a photograph
of which I send here-
with. It has been
suggested that the
sitter was the cele-
brated Flora Mai -
donald.
Yours faithfully,
J. A. MacPhkrson.
Unidentified
Portrait
(No. 170),
March, 1915.
Dear Sir, — As to
unidentified portrait
No. 170, I think the
engraving by J.
Simon, after Kneller,
shows that it cannot
be Bishop Atterbury.
The faces are wholly
unlike. The bands
are those of a French
ecclesiastic ; as to the
wig, I am not com-
petent to give an
opinion.
Yours faithfully,
(Rev.) 1.. J. T.
1 (arwall.
Notes and On cries
Cleaning Plaster Casts.
Dear Sir, — I have three trays of plaster casts, re-
productions of the designs of statuary by Thorwaldsen
find that soft portions of the plaster become detached
after a prolonged working on any one part. The
casts in question are for the most part round or oval
i77)
UNIDEN III IED PAINTING
and Canova, which, through age and inattention, are
now covered with a thick coating of dirt, evidently
dust that has become embedded in the surface plaster,
and settled down into the crevices of the designs.
Could any of your readers provide me with a remedy
for removing the dirt without materially damaging the
casts? I have tried a small camel's-hair brush, but
in shape, their diameters ranging from half an ini h to
three inches. I should be most grateful of anj help
or advice in the above matter.
Yours faithfully, B. Ledbrooki
Unidentified Painting (No. 177).
Dear Sirs, — I am enclosing you a photograpl
(178) unidentified painting
33
T/ic C 'onuoisseur
ol a large painting I
have in my posses-
sion, which I believe
to be by Jean Honore
Fragonard. I should
be glad i I you would
insert this in your
next edition o f T u i
Connoissei R, to see
if any of your readers
can authenticate the
picture.
Yours faithfully
(for A. G. Hariiy
Jones), E. J.
Unidentified
Paintings (Nos. 178,
I 79 AND 180).
I >ear Sir, — I en-
close herewith three
photographs of paint-
ings, whi ch are the
property of relatives
of mine, i n the hope
that some of your readers may be able to identify
their authorship. With referaice to the church
C79)
UNIDENTIFIED TAIN flNG
much obliged if you would
this matter to your readers. -
interior, this picture
has been attributed to
E. de VVitte, although
others claim that it is
by de Blieck. The
painting is on three
wood panels, and
measures 42 in. by
28 in., while the sub-
ject bears a strong re-
semblance to a much
smaller painting by
de Blieck, at present
on view at the Glas-
gow Corporation Art
Galleries at Kelvin-
grove, the title of
w h i c h is Chu rch
Interior (Haarlem?).
The two portraits are
French paintings of
e i g h t e e n t h-c entu ry
period (ovals), and
each measures 23 in.
by 19 in. I should be
be so good as to submit
-Yours sincerely, R. S. S.
(i So)
UNIDENTIFIED PAINTING
34
V
r^
"*■**,
| gpp>
THE COl NTESS OF GRAMMONT
BY SIR PETER I.KLY
/h //it- collection of Karl Spencer, K.G., at A!t;^"j
. V^SWK
IPotteryand
Poirelai
Chinese Pottery and Porcelain
The issue of works on
ceramic art has been so volu-
minous in recent years that
the collector, both in the in-
terests of his pocket and his
overcrowded book >
has been compelled to closely
scrutinize the pretensions of
each new-comer before ad-
mitting it to his reference
library. In the case of a work
by Mr. R. L. Hobson, this
scrutiny is likely to be dis-
pensed with. Mr. Hobson's
knowledge of ceramic wares
is so exhaustive that no vol-
ume on the subject by him
can fail to possess a permanent
value. As regards English
wares, there are several writers
w h o rank with him in au-
thority, but in the domain of
Chinese ceramics he and Dr.
S. W. Bushell share an un-
questioned supremacy among
English writer-. M r.
Hobson's latest work — Chinese
Pottery and Porcelain : an
account of the potto's art in
( Vtina from primitive linns to
the present day—\% perhaps his
most valuable contribution 01
the subject. He has brought
wi thin i he co m pas> of two
1 1 \ olumes ad'
lory of over twenty centui i ol
Chinese ceramic pi i idu tion. It
is not pri ti iled that i
form of pottery and porcelain
is exhaustively ed -the
maginati on, indeed. >vo
i i at the i onti mp lai ii in
of such a gigantic task
i all) every type that has
appeared in the European
markel n treated upon.
I [I ,i 1:1 I IF - II' It) U
ONGEVITV MAIN HI
Willi " I- \\1 II II \ I I; I I " E.N V.I I
k'ang MM PERU iD (l
: I . \~,\ IN. SALT]
(VICTORI \ \ND U BER I MUSEUM)
37
as well as many types which arc
known to Europeans only by
repute. Mr. Hobson may well
be congratulated on the pro-
duction of such an exhaustive
work, every page of which bears
evidence of original resi
and investigation.
The history of earl\ Cli
ceramic art is derived from two
sources — the ancient Chinese
literature on the subject, much
of which has been placed at the
disposal of English re tdi
through the translat >
Bushell: and the evidence
afforded by various pieces of
ancient ware which are still in
eno Mr. II obson has
freely availed himself of Dr.
Bushel l's translations, but,
while substantially
them, he has amended them in
ii ii ius iiei.nl>. In general he
is di sincl i iied to acce pt the
statements oi these Ch
authorities, unless they are
' 01 roborated by independent
evidence, and in this way he
omewhat modified the
generally accepted idea of the
extreme antiquity of the po
craft in China. Ai i Ording to
■ authorities, thi
of potl ci to the
mythical Sh£n-nung, whom
rerrien di
1 might be identified with
Sargon, the ruler of Chaldea,
about 3800 B.< . The semi-
legendary eini an Ti
* Chim st Potti
by R. L. Ho B.A issell &
iny, Ltd. 2 vols. . ,
The Connoisseur
97B.1
to have appointed a su-
perintendent of pottery,"
and it is a common-
place in the old Chinese
literature that the em-
peror Vii Ti Shun 2317 -
220S B.C. highly es
teemed pottery.
All these statement-
lead to the inference that
the potters art was flour-
ishing and had reached
a substantial degree ot
ancement anterior
to the period of the
Chou dynasty 1 [69-256
B.( . . Mr. Hobson re-
gards this as unproven.
and points out that
even the surviving wares
belonging to the last
part of the Chou period
possess only an anti-
quarian interest, and
evidences of anything
bevond primitive art and
craftsmanship have so far not been found earlier than in
the Han period 206 B.C. to 220 A.D. .
The Han dynasty united the states of China into a
great and prosperous empire, having commercial relations
\\ i t h adjoining
states, through
which a consider-
able trade was car-
ried on with the
outlying provinces
of Rome. This
foreign intercourse
appears to have
given the Chinese
potter much of the
knowledge which
was to be turned
to such good ac-
count during later
generations. One
thing that may have
been derived from
it was an acquaint-
ance with the art
of glazing, at that
time practised
throughout West-
ern Asia. None of
the work that can
be positively identi-
fied as belonging
to the Chou period
i s glazed, though
I AM. POTTERY PILGRIM BOTTLE HEIGHT, 7A IN.
(KOECHLIN COLLECTION)
SUNG DYNASTY VASE IN THE FORM OF A LOTUS FLOWER HARK
GREY STONEWARE, BURNT REDDISH BROWN, MILKY t
CLOSELY CRACKLED HEIGHT, 7 IN.
some of it appears to
have been coloured with
unfiled pigments. The
majority of the Han
pieces, on the contrary,
are glazed, "the typi-
cal Han glaze being a
translucent greenish
yellow, which, over a
red body, produces a
colour varying from leaf
green to olive brown.'
Though hardly a p -
proaching the refine-
ment attained in later
ceramic work, or even
that of contemporary
craftsmen in jade and
metal, the productions
of the Han potter are
marked by high artistic
interest. They included
reproductions of com-
mon objects of life, as
well as forms and orna-
mentation derived from
metal-work.
Owing to the large number of Han tombs containing
pottery which have come to light through the excava-
tions for railways and other causes, we are far better
informed about Han wares than of those of many of the
later periods. With
the end of the dy-
nasty China again
became split up
into warring states.
It was not until the
advent of the T'ang
dynasty 'nS-906
\. D. that the em-
pire again became
united. The art-
suffered during the
period of confusion :
nevertheless, from
the references in
Chinese literature
it may be inferred
"that new kinds
of pottery ap-
peared from time
to time, and it is
certain that the
evolution which
culminated in por-
celain made sen-
sible advances."
1'nder the T'ang
dynasty the em-
pire reached the
(FREER COLLECTION)
38
-tri —
• - /
• - :
< < >
... 3 <
z
■' : . -
,. - ' "
39
The ( onnoisseur
zenith of its power,
C hinese .1 r m 1
penetrating into
Central India, Chi-
nese i unks into the
Persian Gulf, and
the northern bound-
aries of t lie empire
extended into Turki-
stan. As during the
Han dynasty, inter-
course with foreign
states was renewed,
and "a host of for-
eign influences must
have penetrated into
the middle kingdom,
including those of
the Indian, Persian,
and Byzantine arts."
T 'a n g pieces a re
only beginning to
find their way to
Europe, and afford
surprising evidences
of the maturity which
ceramic art attained
during the period of
the dynasty. The
majority of the speci-
mens which have
come to light are
mortuary pieces, and
until more tombs are
exhumed and further
pieces surrendered
by Chinese c 0 1 -
lectors, it will be
impossible to form
a final e stimate
of T'ang pottery.
Among its especial
characteristics are
the large proportion
of figure pieces it
includes. Some of
these are clearly
inspired by Graeco-
Roman influence, and rival their exemplars in force and
spirit. Horses are taken for subjects with great fre-
quency, and are modelled with great boldness and
character. Perhaps the sculpturesque power of the
T'ang craftsmen is best shown, however, in the large
Buddhist figures, of which a few rare examples have
been brought to Europe. These, while embodying
the Buddhist idea of abstraction and aloofness, are
realised with wonderful literalness, and offer a com-
bination of monumental repose with the expression of
mental energy that is in its way quite unrivalled. These
figures are even more remarkable as pottery than as
MODBI OF A " FOWLING I ow KK
GREEN GLAZE HEIGHT,
sculpture. Speaking
of a splendid ex-
ample in the British
Museum, 50 inches
high, Mr. H o b s o n
states that "to lire-
such a mass of ma-
terial without subsi-
dence or cracking
would tax the capa-
bilities of the best
modern pottery,
while the skill dis
played in the model-
ling is probably
unequalled in any
known example of
ceramic sculpture."
The glazes used by
the T'ang potters
were numerous, and
t he shapes of their
pieces and the styles
of ornamentation
used remarkable for
their variety. Some
recently discovered
pieces would even
seem to prove that
painting with a brush
was practised 1 > y
them.
The five brief dy-
nasties which fill the
sixty -four years' in-
terval between the
T'ang period and
the Sung period
1960-1279 A. n. are
known by few dis-
tinctive wares of im-
portance. The last-
named period was
the golden age of
Chinese arts, and
the Sung wares ha\ e
always been re-
garded by Chinese
connoisseurs as reaching the high-water-mark of ceramic
excellence. So highly are they prized that comparatively
few specimens of them are permitted to leave the
country, and Europeans, for the present, have largely
to be content with a second-hand knowledge of them.
"The Sung wares are true children of the potter's craft,
made as they are by the simplest processes, and in the
main decorated only by genuine potter methods." Then-
most important feature "lies in their glaze, which holds
la quti/ite maitresse de la ceramique," as an enthusiastic
French writer has expressed it. Its richness, thickness,
lustre, translucency, and its colour and crackle are the
HAN POTTERY, Willi 1 KI I il.se F.N I
|0 IN. (FREER COLLECTION)
40
Chinese Pottery and Porcelain
main criteria
of the wares
in the eyes of
Chinese con-
noisseurs.
Space will not
permit one to
follow Mr.
Hobson in his
interesting ac-
count of the
different varie-
t i e s of the
wares, some of
the most es-
teemed of
which are still
unrepresented
in European
collect ions.
The pieces of
this period
formed a great
source of in-
spirat ion to
later Chinese
makers, and
were frequent-
ly imitated.
Ontheques-
tion o f t h e
exact period in
which Chinese porcelain originated, Mr. Hobson is in
direct conflict with Dr. Bushell's latest pronouncements,
which apparently lean to the theory that porcelain was
first made so far back as the Han dynasty. Mr. Hob-
son complains that Dr. Bushell bases his idea on the
mistranslation of a Chinese word, which he renders as
"porcelain" instead of "pottery." A knowledge of
Chinese would be essential to do justice to the merits
of the controversy. Mr. Hobson, however, makes out
a strong case for his contention, and such extraneous
evidence as exists, chiefly of a negative character, leans
decidedly on his side. No specimens of porcelain be-
longing to the Han or even the T'ang period have yet
been discovered, and the inference appears to be that
its manufacture was not accomplished until the T'ang
period. Mr. William Burton, in the last edition of the
Encyclopedia Britannica, coincides with this view, whii h,
one would imagine, must be generally accepted until
direct evidence is produced to the contrary, in the form
of pieces belonging to the earlier dynastie
The Yuan dynasty ( 1 280- 1 367 V.D.), founded by the
Tartars under Kublai Khan, gave little encourag ll
to ceramic art, and it was not until the time of the Ming
dynasty 1 368 [64 1 1 that it made any substantial ad\ am e.
The works of this period, ami even 1 those of the
1 li in- dynasty 1044-1910), are naturally the best known
to Europeans, and arc besl repre ented in publii and
T'ANG POTTERY DIsII Willi MIRROR pattern incised ami coloured blue,
GREEN, ETC.; INNER BORDER OF " JU-I " CLOUD SCROLLS "N \ MOTTLED
YELLOW GROUND, OUTER I'.ORDER OF MOTTLED GREEN: PALE GREEN GI VZE
UNDERNEATH AND IIIRF.H TUSK-SHAPED FEET DIAMETER, I_S IN.
(EUMORFOPOULOS COI I I S)
private collec-
tions. To these
periods prac-
tically belong
all the finer
kinds of Chi-
nese porcelain,
the earlier
pieces which
come within
that category
showing little
differentiation
from stone-
ware. The
wares belong-
ing to these
periods are so
varied and nu-
merous that it
is i 111 possible
to attempt to
fo 1 1 ow M r.
Hobson in his
elaborate d e -
scription and
classification
of them. His
book i s deci-
dedly the best
and most ex-
haustive epi-
tome of Chinese ceramic art that has been placed before
the English reader. Perhaps "epitome" is the wrong word
to use in this conjunction ; for though the work cannot con-
tain such minute particulars as is given in books dealing
only with individual phases of the subject, the information
given regarding the different kinds of potter) and 1 e
lain, the factories at which they were produced, and the
characteristics and marks by which they are to be dis-
tinguished, is at once so full and so concisely put that
even the highly specialised collector will find 11 of great
value in studying the particular period Or style which he
affects. To the general student no book can be n ■
mended more highly. It is written with a clearness and
precision that leaves little scope for misunderstanding.
The plates arc numerous, and have been can ful
to give the best idea of the different types of pottery and
pon elain. A highly valuable featui iieo
illustrated is elaborately described and its salient cha-
racteristics pointed out. In this way the plates will be
.ii great assist; : to the tyro in identifying the style and
period of any piece which may be offered to him. I
plate ; 11 mi « I an gem rail) ol exi elleni qua
and those in colour, if not always reprodui ing the exai 1
tints oi the pieci ; from which they arc taken an almost
mpo ble perl 1 ilour proo
always sufficiently explicit as not to allow an) dou
in the identity oi the oi iginals.
4i
shm*7t»o
A Carved
Ivory Horn
The carved horn illustrated, made from an
elephant's tusk in my collection, is a fine pie< :e ol
sixteenth-century work, and portrays
an interesting story. The legend runs
somewhat as follows : " St. Hubert, a
worldly man, was out hunting, and spied a white stag,
which baffled all pursuit
for many days. He pursued
and became separated
from his fellow-huntsmen.
-•
/.
M
CARVKfl IVORY HORN
Towards evening he came
up with the stag, and was
about to strike when he per-
ceived a crucifix suspended
between the antlers: at the
same time a mysterious
voice addressed him.
Hubert fell on his knees,
became a convert to the
faith, and vowed to erect a
monastery on the spot."
( )n the upper part of the
horn may be seen the
monastery, on a pine-clad
hill. Below is the stag with
the crucifix, and, lower still,
Hubert, his horse, and
hounds. Near the dog's-
head mouth-piece is an
elaborate monogram, on a
shield, which displays the
letters T.L.C. intertwined,
and at the lower end of
the horn the monogram
A.E. D. The carving is
so beautiful, and the story
illustrates so closely the
well-known engraving by
Albert Diirer, that, were
not the letter E included
in the monogram, the work might well be supposed
to be that of the artist himself, who at times turned
his attention to carving. The horn is very heavy,
and measures 26 inches from end to end. — W. B.
Redfern.
There are many people who have an idea that
French furniture is
The " Straight
Line " in French
Furniture
all curves and orna-
ment or fragile
and uncomfortable.
Comfort, it must be
admitted, was not a
sinequanoti with the
lurniture-makers of
old times in France,
but curves were
characteristic of one
period of French art
only — the Rocoi ".
The misleading
habit of applying a
sovereign's name to
certain marked ten-
dencies that show
the departure from
old canons of design
is purely one of
convenience. Louis
Seize had no more
to do with the es-
tablishment of a
new vogue of deco-
ration than did his
beautiful queen ;
both accepted the
< AKVED IVORY MORN
42
Xofi-s
ideas of the
ni uvenient
that had been
ring for
years, and
simplycrystal-
lised during
their reign. So
it has ever
. and not
in France
alone. To
work out the
chain of evi-
dence back-
wards, com-
mencing with
: hat period
w h i c h w a s
falsely a s-
sumed to
have taken a
deli berate
plunge from
all the rules
that governed
furniture de-
sign in pre-
vious gene-
rations — the
Empire and the Directoire — we find that in the latter
of LouisXVI.'s reign there were cabinet-makers
EARLY LOUIS XVI. CABINET, WITH PAINTED PANELS
who designed
furniture hav-
ing a v e r y
pronounced
feeling for
that formality
which is
of the cha-
racteristii -
classic art.
Lavas s cur.
who assisted
Moligny so
much in the
copying of
Buhl designs
in the 1 a t e
e i g h t ee n t h
century, was
an ibeniste
strongly d i s
p o s e d to
severity o l
forms. Even
Carlin. the re-
nowned em-
ployer of lac
panels in his
cabinets, was
an advocate
straight line," which one prejudiced writer refers
to scathingly, in summing up the taste of the moment :
BLACK I AC CA1
\K1.IN
43
Rion
The Connoisseur
" Choice finish
a n d 1 a v i s li
expenditure
strove i n vain
to confer
wealth of as-
pect on pover-
ty-stricken
invention, and
thus began the
triumph of the
straight line."
The said tri-
umph h a d a
long record of
appreciat i on
behind it be-
fore i t arrived
at t h e pre-
e m inence it
enjoyed in fur-
niture o f the
Directoire
and E m p i r e
periods. The
perfect sim-
plicity and bal-
ance of parts
in the secre-
taire belonging
toSirJohnMur-
ray Scott, and
illustratedhere-
with, would
not nowadays
strike one as
displaying pov-
erty-stricken
invention ; but one ran easily understand the dissatis-
faction anyone would feel who was brought up on
Rococo traditions. It was the reaction from the
excess in this form of decoration that started the
desire for simplicity, and out of the labyrinth of orna-
ment, in which designs of the Regency were lost, the
path on to perfect simplicity was a long one; but it
was followed steadily. Look at the illustration of the
Carlin lac cabinet on previous page. The forms are
as rigid as in the Directoire secretaire; the frieze is
elaborated Creek ornament. The connecting links
between the new feeling and the old are the bronze
mounts at the top of each of the columns ; these have
an affinity with the realistic masques of the Rococo
time, yet Carlin was essentially a Louis XVI. man.
The " straight line " is responsible for the charm in the
EMPIRE DRESSING-TABLE, slloulM
other cab inet
i 1 1 u strated,
which also
finds a home
in that wonder-
ful collection in
theRueLafitte.
The frieze of
the centre
panel is similar
to that on the
lac cabinet. But
certain details
are significant
of the earlier
date of the de-
sign, notably
the piers that
form the angles
to the cabinet ;
these have the
same bold
scrolls as Buhl
was so addicted
to in his large
artnoires. Fur-
ther, the whole
feeling of th e
b r o n z e s o n
these piers is
reminiscent o t
much ol the
ornament ol
that period
k n o w n a s
LouisXV. The
gar 1 ands of
flowers and
their sustaining ribbons show a subtle difference to
the same type of ornament executed in the latter years
of Louis XVI.'s reign. We see also in the rounded
medallions, painted in rich tones, the influence of the
curved line still holding a place in the designer's mind.
It is, of course, the change from curves to straight lines
that differentiates most markedly the styles known by
the names of the last two kings of France ; yet this,
after all, was but a return to the satisfying severity i il
form in the massive pieces of the Louis XIV. epoch.
In those days classic details were quite as much ap-
preciated as in the Napoleonic era. The rams' head-,
the masks and grotesques, the free use of arabesques,
what are they but a continuation of the Fompeian
idea? Practically only the Rococo has departed from
the classic rules: all other periods of cultivated arts
EGYPTIAN FEELING IN I 1 1 !•: MOUNTS
44
Notes
Our Plates
show the basis of the
ideas of the designers of
different centuries to be
purely classic, and this
most perfect of all deco-
rative schools regarded
the "straight line "as the
fundamental principle
for all design.
Sir Joshua Reynolds
has seldom, if ever, borne
the inter-
pretation
of hisworkinbetter style
than in the rendering of
his emblematical figure
ol Design, by Joseph
( Irozer. The mezzotint
was published in 1794
by John Jeffryes, and is
a portrait of Elizabeth
Johnson, afterwards
Mrs. 1 ) cane, the third
daughter of Elizabeth,
the younger of Rev-
nolds's two married
sisters. The artist
painted her more than
once ; she posed for,
among other subjects, the figure of Fortitude in the
Oxford window. Another splendid example of the
mezzotinter's art is figured in the plate, by and after
1. R. Smith, entitled What you Will, which is one from
a valuable set of four engravings. The dainty figure
of the girl seated in a park-like landscape presents a
particularly charming subject, apart from the beauty oi
its rendering. We reproduce in this number also the
companion to the Portrait of a Lady, by Adam Buck,
which appeared in our last issue, where we treated ol
the matter more fully. It will suffice to add, however,
that the one with which we are now dealing is also an
original drawing signed by the artist, and dated 1.S04.
DIRECTOIRE SE< i I
The remainder of our
plates deal with some
of the most celebrated
women in English his-
tory. Georgiana, eldest
daughter of the first Earl
Spencer, was born in
1 757. and died in 1806,
having married the fifth
1 >uke of Devonshire in
1774. Her must notable
exploit probably con-
sisted in the winning
manner i n wh ich she
canvassed for Fox dur-
ing the W est minster
election of 1 784. The
characteristic portrait of
this lady by Sir Joshua
Reynolds, which we re-
produce, is in the col-
lection of Earl Spencer.
K.C.. at Althorp, as i^
also the line portrait
by I.ely of the Countess
oj Grammont, who, as
Elizabeth Hamilton,
married the Comte de
Grammont in 1663. If
brother Anthony n
the Memoires du Comte de Grammont, which have
bectmie so famous as pictures of court life under the
restored monarchy.
In our last issue we reproduced a line Portrait <>J
the Infanta Margarita Teresa, by Velasquez, which
forms a valuable asset to the collection of Mr. H. C.
Frick, whose name bids fair to be bracketed with
that of the late Pierpont Morgan. In the same
possession 1- the beautiful Portrait oj Lady Skif-..
which was painted by Sir Joshua Reynolds in 1787
The subject, the wile of Sir Thomas Georg< Skipwith,
is treated in a manner consistenl with the artist's
most successful style.
IACOB DES.VI \1.1 \
'-
,;v-
miuo tfmpnfrcum
itruflis regis
W
In Napoleon in Exile at St. Helena Mr. Norwood
Young has produced a worthy sequel to his interesting
account of the emperor's experi-
ences at Elba. The present
narrative presents a more ignoble
picture of the fallen potentate. His
mind, detached from great spheres
of activity, descends to little ones.
He devotes the same intellectual
application to inflicting petty slights
on his English captors as he formerly gave to impose his
individual will on the destinies of Europe. Napoleon,
indeed, is less the hero of Mr. Young's volumes than his
much-maligned guardian, Sir Hudson Lowe. The author
" Napoleon in
Exile at
St. Helena," by
Norwood Young
(Stanley Paul &
Co. 2 vols.
32s. net)
proves him to be an honourable and courteous gentleman
who conducted himself with straightforward rectitude
under exceptionally trying circumstances. The difficulty
of the situation lay in Napoleon's attempt to abrogate the
conditions of his captivity as determined by the British
government. The government refused him recognition
of his rank of emperor, and, in order to prevent his escape,
decided that effectual supervision was to be kept over his
person. Lowe's duty was to enforce these conditions,
and he did so with every regard to the comfort and well-
being of his captive. Neither Napoleon's interests nor
his inclinations allowed him to acquiesce in them without
opposition. He warmly resented the deprivation of his
title of emperor, and he realised that if he made the best
STEUBEN'S PII rl Rl Ol INK DEATH-BED OF NAPOLEON FROM "NAPOLEON IN EXILE \1 ST. HELENA" (STANLEY PA1 1 WT' I O.)
46
- *
PORTRAIT OF A LADY
FROM A DRAWING BY ADAM BUCK
The Connoisseur Bookshelf
ol things and subsided im<> .1 complacent captivity, sur-
rounded by every material comfort, there was a danger of
the public interest in him subsiding. This would have
been fatal to the hopes and plans he still cherished. If
the restoration of his empire was not one of them, he at
least desired to be moved to where he would be more in
touch with his followers and admirers, ready to take any
opportunity for aggrandisement that the future offered.
The English opposition, more from dislike of the govern-
ment than esteem of Napoleon, were warmly in his
favour; he had powerful friends on the Continent ; so
became his purpose to give his supporters an excuse to
interfere on his behalf by making the situation at St.
Helena an impossible one. The emperor was in a good
position to do this. He was surrounded by his suite and
servants, who were ready to assist him by all means in
their power; he was in possession of practically unlimited
funds ; and among the population of the island, the troops
garrisoning it, and the visitors from passing ships, were
many sympathisers who were willing to try and circum-
vent the necessary restrictions put upon Napoleon and
his household. Lowe was not properly backed up by
the English government ; though all communications
relating to the prisoner were supposed to pass through
his hands, they encouraged O'Meara, the naval surgeon,
who first took the position of English doctor in atten-
dance on Napoleon, to correspond direct with them. As
1 I'Meara, who had been bribed by Napoleon, was wholly
working in his interests, and trying to upset Lowe's
authority, the latter was placed in an extremely trying
position. O'Meara was sent back to England, where he
wrote a book full of libels on the governor, to which the
latter was not permitted to reply. John Stokoe, another
naval surgeon, who after O'Meara's departure was per-
mitted to attend Napoleon, was also bribed. Both doctors-
furnished false reports of the emperor's health. His
idea was to represent himself as succumbing from the
injurious effects of the St. Helena climate and the harsh
treatment of his captors. To ^i\e colour to the last
idea he first loaded Lowe with insults, and then kept
himself concealed from the officers appointed to attest
his presence in the island, his scheme apparently
being to force the governor to use violence to assure
himself of the safety of his charge. Lowe's tact and
a 1 it foiled this. Then the ironic hand of fate
intervened. Napoleon, who had been shamming illness
for his own purposes, became dimly consi ious that he
was afflicted with a mortal disease. lie who was such
an adept 111 deceiving others now tried to deceive
himself into the belief that all was well with him. The
violent exercise he took with this idea may probably
ha 1 hastened his death. It was a misfortune to Lowe
that it happened during his tenure ol office, lor it gave
point to many libels concerning him which otherwise
would have been forgotten. The English government,
fearful that their misdealings with his subordinati
would come to light, prevented him from making any
publii defence; and though later writers have disposed
ni ome of the grosset slanders, Me Norwood Young's
interesting book is the first to do him adequate 1
V&IERICAN art emu ism s generally tinctured by a
strong element of conservatism. This is shown in the
volume of essays by Mr. Kenyon
"Artist and the Cox, who uses his virile pen to ex-
Public, and Other press opinions not greatly differing
Essays on Art from tnose llelci by the majority of
Subjects," by English critics about forty or fifty
Kenyon Cox v(.^ back Th;s does not impl>.
(George Allen '^ th arg correct) ()r (.ven out of
and Unwin
date, t.11 artistic taste moves in
5s. net) , , . . , 1 ,
cycles, and it is quite possible that
what may seem reactionary views to-day may become
the leading inspiration of the most advanced artists ot
to-morrow. Mr. Cox is an advocate of established
tradition in art ; lie has a healthy contempt for post-
impressionism and other modern cults, and shows but
scant sympathy for nineteenth-century impressionism.
He even damns Whistler with faint praise, and finds the
great strength of modern American art is in its affinity
to that of the old Italian masters. One can sympathise
with much — perhaps even the major portion of what
the writer advocates, which is substantially a return to
methods of painting based on tradition and common
sense — but one feels that he pushes his conclusions too
far. The logical deduction from them is that artists
should paint not what they want, but what the publii
want. This would save us from much bad art, but it
would also prevent much of the greatest art from
being produced. Mr. Cox's contention is that such a
stall- of affairs existed until the beginning of the nine-
teenth century, before when, "with the exception ot
Rembrandt, . . . you will scarce find an unappre
ciated genius 111 the whole history of art." The write]
has obviously forgotten the history of the Dutch -
m which the neglect of genius, so tar from being the
1 eption, was rather the rule, Hals, Jan Stcen, Vermeer
of Delft, Pieterde Hooch, Jacob van Ruisdael, Hobbema,
and many others, all faring as badly, if not worse, than
their great compatriot. To David, whom Mr. Cox styles
"the first of the moderns," a title not usually given
to this reactionary artist, the author ascribes the be-
ginning of the confusion in modern art. He "felt it
necessary to destroy the traditions of an ait crea
the aristocracy. In his own art of painting he
so thoroughly that the pa 1 the next generation
found themselves with no traditions at all/' This is
surely a somewhat 1 of the matter, 1'
was les^ David than the moral sentiment ot the 1
Resolution which destroyed the questionable art of the
aristocratic regime which preceded it David, fai I
leaving artists without traditions, re-established the
classical tradition winch was bin art ol the
Continent tor fifty years, Mr. Cox should feel sympathj
t,ii i.ne who, to .1 1 ertain exti nt, was his precursor. The
American writer, in his es^.iys on Raphael, Millet, and
Augustus Saint-Gaudens, show lily in
sympathy with the clas cal spirit in ai 1 ivould leaven
the vagarii ponsibility of modernity with in-
spiration draw 11 from
in the past. David had a similar ambition: that his
4'l
The Connoisseur
efforts were on the whole detrimental to the cause of art
was owing less to the incorrectness of his ideals than
that he failed to cany out his own precepts and base
his work on nature ;h well as on the masterpieces of
the past.
The scholastic s\stem of England is almost as old
is the nation. Before the Anglo-Saxons had thoroughly
settled down in their then new con-
"The Schools (|lR.>t and ,ong before they had
of Mediaeval , ,
united into one people, Augustine
England," by ., ...
. " _ ' came among them, like a missionarv
A. F. Leach . , , . ,,.,',
„ _, . . of the present day, and established
, r, , „ not only the Church, but the schools
quary s Books
Methuen & Co., wh,c!l "ere to suPP'y " w'th future
Ltd. 7s. 6d. net) Priests :ind adherents. Mr. A. F.
Leach awards to Canterbury the
distinction of being the first school founded in the
country, and though his contentions may be disputed by
the advocates of one or two other claimants for priority,
they seem to be practically unassailable. It is almost
certain that the school was founded in the year 598 ; in
631 it had "already a custom of its own, and was estab-
lished enough to become models for other kingdoms."
The schools of Rochester and St. Paul's, London,
probably date from 604. Of other famous schools Win-
chester has some claims to be considered as the place
where Alfred the Great was educated, and was, at any
rate, flourishing in the year 1001 ; Eton was founded by
Henry VI. : while Harrow, which did not come into
being until 1571, is too modern to come within the scope
of Mr. Leach's interesting volume. Mediaeval England
appears to have been far better supplied with schools
than was modern England until a comparatively short
time ago; thus in 1377 there was one school to about
every five thousand inhabitants, whereas in 1864 the
proportion was only about a fifth of this. In spite, how-
ever, of the ample "supply of schools, the results were
disappointing." The scholars very largely went to swell
the ranks of the celibate clergy, and so remained apart
from the family life of the nation, and it was not until
after the Reformation that the country reaped the full
advantage of its scholastic institutions. Much interesting
light is thrown on the treatment of the scholars during
mediaeval times. Flogging, of course, was an insepar-
able part of their regimen. Stripes were considered a
necessary concomitant to learning. Everyone had to
endure them, even a crowned king not being exempt.
Richard Earl of Warwick, when tutor to Henry VI., find-
ing his royal pupil was beginning to resent his chastise-
ment, appealed to the council to support his authority, and
the punishments continued until the king had completed
his education. Though the nominal hours of tuition
were far longer than the present time, the occurrence
of numerous saints' days, which were kept as whole or
partial holidays, prevented the pupils from being over-
worked. Mr. Leach gives an immense amount of in-
formation about the foundation of early schools, their
endowments, the fees paid by scholars, and the salaries
of the masters : and his work, if not exactly light reading.
is full of interesting information. The illustrations, of
which there are over forty, are in nearly all instances re-
produced from contemporary manuscripts and sculpture.
The third volume of The King's Ships begins with the
history of the " Endymion " and concludes with that of
the "Jupiter." The vessels of which
1 lie K.mg s an account j3 given include many
" ' ' names famous in English naval
Commander , ■ , ., , .,
IT „ . , history, ami the letterpress recount-
H. b. Lecky , ' , , . , . , ,
„ . TII ing the stirnng deeds in which they
,tt M . took part is illustrated with numerous
(Horace Muir- v
head. In 6 vols. >'lates reproduced from interesting
at £2 2s.net each) contemporary pictures and prints.
These, perhaps, show greater variety
than in the preceding volumes. Original pictures and
drawings have been utilised to a greater extent, including
those of many artists whose work is now little known.
Though the illustrations are generally on a comparatively
small scale, and the quality of some of the blocks might
be improved, the work, when finished, will not only be
the most complete and authoritative history of the ships
of the Royal Navy, but also by far and away the best
record of English naval art. Though the larger portion
of the plates in the third volume are reproduced from
photographs and a substantial proportion of the re-
mainder from anonymous works, over fifty artists are
represented, beginning with Anthony Anthony, a painter
of the time of Henry VIII. A number of the illustrations
serve to remind one that before the days when photography
rendered the sketches of the "man on the spot" almost
superfluous, the Navy numbered many capable amateurs
in its ranks. Yice-Admiral R. B. Beechey, the son of
the well-known portrait painter, was a frequent exhibitor
at the Royal Academy ; Admiral Sir Edward Inglefield
was also represented on the walls at Burlington House :
while among other officers whose work is reproduced are
Captain J. Brenton and Lieutenant P. W. 1'ontifex,
these plates being neither the least able nor interesting
in the volume. Turning to the letterpress, one would
suggest that in future volumes Commander Lecky might
be more explicit regarding the armament of modern
ships. In the days of the old wooden ships the im-
portance of a vessel was rightly gauged by the number
of guns it carried, but with the introduction of the iron-
clad the calibre of the guns gradually became so varied
that a ship carrying half a dozen might have a far more
powerful armament than another with thrice the number.
Unless this is pointed out, the casual reader may carry
away quite a wrong impression from the facts recorded.
Thus at first sight the third "Inflexible" — a six-gun
paddle sloop, launched in 1845 — would seem to be more
powerful than its successor of 1876, which only contained
four guns ; and it is not everyone that will recall that
these guns were each of 80 tons, and the most powerful
which up to that date had ever been placed in a warship.
Similar misconceptions may arise in regard to the war-
ships of the existing fleets, the primary and secondary
armament of which is not differentiated, six-inch and
twelve-inch guns being indiscriminately grouped together
The Connoisseur Bookshelf
in the one aggregate. While making full use of official
records, Commander Lecky has largely supplemented
them with items drawn from various sources. These, it
must be confessed, make by far the more lively reading,
and the author is to be congratulated on his success
in bringing so much fresh material together. At the
present time the history of the king's ships possesses
an unique interest, and those who study it will find that
the comparatively small number of disasters which have
chequered the naval successes during the present war
have had their counterpart during almost every long
struggle in which the nation has been engaged. The
record of the Royal Navy is not wholly one of victory ;
the price of admiralty has been paid for in many an
isolated and hopeless struggle against overwhelming
odds, as well as in those great fleet battles and innumer-
able sea duels in which the English were triumphant.
Supremacy in the Seven Seas is no small thing to acquire,
and to maintain it costs a constant expenditure of blood
and treasure.
THOUGH the leading principles of etching have been
si an el y modified since the time of Rembrandt, the number
of appliances and materials used in its
lng: production have largely increased
. ,, , during recent years. Most of these
Treatise bv
„ , ,, ' , additions, if not indispensable, are at
Earl H. Reed , . , , , , ,
,r^ -r, t> . least useful, and the beginner who
(G. P. Putnam's . ' ° . .
r makes himsell acquainted with their
e ,, various properties stands at a con-
siderable advantage to one who
contents himself only with a knowledge of the appliances
formerly used. Mr. Earl H. Reed's practical treatise on
etching goes into this phase of the subject very thorough-
ly. His list of the articles contained in an etcher's
equipment occupies over three pages, and comprises
about a hundred separate items. Whether these are all
necessary or not may be a matter of question ; but as
the author explains clearly and in full detail the purpose
of every item, the reader is put into a position to discard
anything that does not commend itself to his ido.i^ ol
utility. With the same exemplary thoroughness the
writer describes the different varieties of etching and the
methods best applicable to each ; the printing of the
plates, the preparation of etching grounds, and the
other multifarious processes connected with the produc-
tion of an etching. On all these subjects Mr. Reed can
be recommended as a reliable guide ; he is not only a
competent etcher himself, but what is more to the point,
he recognises that his reader may be wholly ignorant
of etching, and so thoroughly enlightens him as to the
elementary as well as the more advanced portions of the
subject. The two original platen given by the author as
illustrations are both good subjects, a good effect being
gained in each by simple and direct treatment. A third
plate, showing the different methods of etching, would
probably have served its purpose bettei ii executed on
a larger scale. Perhaps the most interesting of the
illustrations, however, is the one gi\ ing | reprodui
tions of two subjects, naturally and artificially printed. In
the former method the effect of the etching owes practi-
cally nothing to the artistic skill of the printer. The
plate is wiped clean of surface ink, and, consequently,
only the actual work of the etcher reproduces in the
printing. The artificial method elevates the craftsman-
ship of the printer into almost as great an importance
as the art of the etcher. The surface of the plate,
instead of being wiped clean, is carefully manipulated
so that ink is left in those places where its presence will
be advantageous in giving additional depth and tone to
the print. This method is legitimate to a certain extent,
but it may be easily so extended that the etched work
becomes merely a skeleton outline to guide the printer
in arranging his ink ; so that the impression taken oft is
really more of a monotype than an etching.
The issue of the Year- Book oj American Etching for
1914 makes one regret that there is not a similar publi-
cation for English work. The hundred
admirably reproduced examples it
contains are taken from the last
Etching, 1914
(John Lane
10s. 6d. net)
" Year-Book of
American
annual exhibition of the Association
of American Etchers. The exhibition
of the Royal Society of Painter-
Etchers would afford at least an equal field for selection,
and a well-mounted volume filled with judiciously selected
subjects would prove equally as valuable a record for
English art as is the present publication for American.
The subjects will not all be entirely fresh to English
readers, for a number of them have been shown in exhi-
bitions on this side of the Atlantic, from where tin
majority of the themes have been gathered. This point
is touched upon by Mr. Forbes Watson in his foreword
to the volume, in which he gives utterance to a faint
note of regret at the cosmopolitan spirit of American ait.
He points out that the work of I hirer, Rembrandt, < '.ova.
and Meryon, because of its native quality, "has a fiavoui
that Whistler has not, a tang that he misses." But is
this so ? Those who know subdued yet exquisitely tinti d
tones of London's ^rey atmosphere can see in Whistler's
Thames-side harmonies and nocturnes an art as true to
tin- s. enes which inspired them and as racy of the soil on
which they came into being as Meryon's Paris scenes;
nor are Whistler's Thames side etchings less English
than the plates of Rembrandt are Dutch. The truth is
that Whistler's art was neither cosmopolitan nor Ami
can, but Anglo Saxon, and one fancies that the best "l
both American and English work in the future will have
to come under the same generic heading. In the fine
series of etc lungs which Mr. Forbes Watson has selei ted
for illustration it can hardly be said of one of them that
it is so distinctively American in sentiment and feeling
that it could not have been produced by ,u\ English
man; we might claim them as an offshoot of English
art were it not equally possible for Americans to claim
,,in etchinj 1 offshoot of theirs. The moral senti
iiient. taste-, and artistic feeling of the- two c cumin,
so close U allied that any new and sane development in
the art of the one- will in< \ itabl - ' nspiration
to the art of tin othi
;'
The Royal Society
of Painters in
Water-Colours
themes than usual
The 164th exhibition of the Royal Water ■ Colour
Society 5A, Pall Mall East), though one of the smallest
that has been seen of recent years,
was far from being the least in-
teresting. The artists represented
departed more from their customary
there was the charm of the unex-
pected about their work, and this, it must be confessed,
exercises a peculiar and inordinate fascination over the
mind of the critic. Novelty of theme, in itself, hardly
constitutes an artistic merit. Its value is derived from
the freshening influence it exercises on the mind of the
artist. Confronted with a problem of form and colour,
already successfully solved, brain and hand are apt to
work mechanically, and art degenerates into mere crafts-
manship. This is not always so. You have some artists
who approach an often-repeated theme with the zest of
an enthusiastic golfer starting a round over his club
course. Most of the Dutch masters come within this
category, and some of the British, like Constable or
Raeburn. The critic may be delighted with their repeated
essays, and yet if he descends not into trivialities, what
can he say about them which he has not already said
about their predecessors? One may take Mr. Napier
Hemy's coasting seascapes as a case in point. The Pretty
Sailing at the R.W. S. was a characteristic example of
the theme he has made peculiarly his own — a fishing-boat
cutting over the blue, breeze-driven waves of the Channel.
Mr. Hemy's observation is always true, his handling
finished without being laboured ; he transmits what he
sees in fresh and pleasant colour, and imparts to his
work the vitality which comes of a lively and sympathe-
tic appreciation of his subject. All these characteristics
were to be found in the Pretty Sailing, but it revealed
! I VYMATES
BY O. WYNNE \PPEK1.EY, R.I.
BY Kixr, PERMISSION OF CHAS. CARPENTER, ESQ.
5-
( 'urrent A ' vt Notes
nothing fresh in the art or outlook of the painter. On
this account one turned to his On the Rocks : Low \\'<itcr
with a greater zest. It showed a broad stretch of bould-
ers and stones covered with a tangle of sea-weed, with a
glimpse of sky beyond the low sea horizon. To merely
say that there was not a more direct or sincere study
from nature in the exhibition might seem to imply a slur
on its pictorial merits, for nature requires editing before
being transferred either to paper or canvas. Mr. Hemy
had done this, with that appearance of artlessness which
is the crowning gift of the artist. The introduction of
two or three figures gave life to the scene; the high lights
on their white draperies both relieved and put into place
the dark masses of rock and sea-weed in the foreground,
and gave distance to the brighter stretches of sea and
sky beyond, and thus converted what might have been
only an interesting study into an adequate and complete
pictorial arrangement. How important this process of
editing, or, as one may better term it, selection, is often
illustrated in the work of Mr. Sargent. He is probably
the most able executant among living artists, and the
power of his brush-work is sufficient to give any pictorial
memoranda by him an artistic interest. He is apt to
presume on this, and appears to wilfully choose themes
which have slight pictorial attraction so as to render the
unaided display of his technical skill the more convinc-
ing. His drawing of In Tyrol may be cited as a typical
example of this. Three-quarters of it were filled with the
blank side of a log hut. Even Mr. Sargent's sentient
brush-work could not make this fascinating, and the two
figures introduced in the far corner of the work were not
sufficient to redeem it. His Boats on the Lake of Garda,
though much slighter, was the more satisfying. The
subject was picturesque; its components — some white-
sailed boats, a patch of blue water, and a background
of sunlit sky — were well arranged, and the handling,
though slight, conveyed a wonderfully adequate sense
of colour, sunlight, and atmosphere. From Mr. Sargent
to Miss E. Fortescue Brickdale one goes to the opposite
poles of artistic outlook. Mr. Sargent is a realist, and
his handling swift and spontaneous; while Miss Brick-
dale paints her romantic essays with careful elaboration.
Her Truth and Fiction was one of her best work-., well
drawn, composed, and coloured.
Mr. Reginald Barrett was another artist whose highly
finished work was seen to advantage His ( enlral Doot
way, St. Mark's, Venice, maybe said to represent the
prose of painting .is good in its way as poetry but not
belonging to the same order. One had a clear and
beautifully expressed statement of form and 1011.111, 1111-
11 pned but set down with tine craftsmanship. Mr. S. J.
Lamorna Birch's / tew showed a wide expanse of 1 ountry,
backed by gathering clouds and mist, .is seen from the
summit of a steep bluff in the foreground. It was lighted
up with silvery sunshine — the sunshine that has bright
lies-, without warmth ami forebodes ne.n approaching
rain; the clearness of the landscape, and the m
thai obscured the forms of the nearer clouds, gave the
same message. The artist had realised the scene with
fine atmospheric verisimilitude, and in colour that "a-
both delicate and sparkling; yet perhaps the gr<
charm of the work was in that indescribable quality
which one loosely describes as feeling — a sense that the
artist's personality is expressed in the work. Mrs. Laura
Knight's several contributions were of a varied charai ter,
Among them were two well-painted cliff scenes, in which
the spectator was supposed to be looking down into the
picture from a greater height than the immediate fore-
ground, an effect which, though legitimate, is rarely wholly
convincing; and a somewhat slightly handled landscape
entitled The Magpie, which only wanted to be carried
a little further to be one of the finest examples of the
artist. Her outlook in this was pre - Raphaelite, the
whole detail of the scene having been realised without
material suppression of facts, and with the feeling that it
was all worthy of record. The handling, though broad
and rather inclined to sketchiness, was adequate 1
in the foreground. Here a large space of blank papei
had been left, which disagreeably attracted the eye, and
helped to bring the distance unduly forward. A little
more labour expended in this portion of the work would
help to give a feeling of completeness to the work at
present wanting. Mr. \V. Russell Flint's fine clas, . al
landscape The Prospect was worthy of the position of
honour awarded it. Dignified in arrangement, sustained
in tone, and rich and harmonious in coloration, its only
failing was a want of restfulness, sky and landscape
equally claiming the interest of the spectator. One
might with some diffidence suggest that if the details ot
the ranges of hills in the middle distance, towards the
left, had been simplified, the work would have gained 111
unity. Mr. Charles Sims was, as usual, not less charming
than tantalizing. His work is curiously fascinating.
About the worst of it there is always a suggestion of
beauties not fully revealed. It affects one like thi
of .1 pretty woman partially hidden by a veil ; one feels
that the artist's conception is insufficiently realised; the
work requires to be carried further before the tantalizing
tions become splendid realities. This failing was
not shown in . / Rose, a daintily expressed figure of a little
girl, wholly true to life in its realisation of the arch-
timidity of childhood, yet invested with esoteric charm.
Ibis tiny morsel of humanity, naked ami unashai
holding out the rose ot love without comprehending its
significance, might well have typified Psyche making hei
Inst exploration of the garden ol I lipid Cupid h
was hown in Love in A ng r, breaking his bow amidst
some lonely rocks. The work was charming in its sugges-
tion, and adequately, but not over-a pn
So much could nol bi aid for The Basket q
po ed on the head of an undraped girl, and backed by a
crimson itreamer, which appeared supported by nothing.
1 1 mplete attitude ol the girl's figure, the upper pan
of which was half-turned round, demanded explicit ex
pression. Mr. Sims had neglected to give this, with the
result that it demanded 1 lose scrutil 1 uuine that
the up pn pari ol hi 1 bust was not meant to represent hei
shoulder-blade. Perhaps Mr. K. Anning Bi
1 losely akin to Mr. Sims in investing his pictures with
esol ■ ! on; bul while Mr. Sims', con epi ons are
The Connoisseur
lightand fanciful, those
of Mr. Bell are i m-
b u e d with m y s t i c
feeling. H is Echo
represented a bevy
of young girls, some
undraped and others
garbed in raiment
rich yet not bright in
colour, standing at
the foot of a huge
cliff. The theme was
joyous, and yet, with-
out introducing any
element of tragedy or
any discordant note
to mar the beauty
with w h i c h he ha d
invested each figure,
Mr. Hell had sur-
charged it with a
subtle melancholy.
The cliff rose up out
of the right of the
picture like a deep
black shadow; there
was no laughter on
the lips of the maid-
ens ; the colouring,
though rich and sus-
tained, was devoid of
any blithesome ac-
cent. One must leave
the work as an enigma,
perhaps an unsolvable one, the strain of sadness which
suffuses it having no more tangible meaning than the
plaintive melody of the nightingale, and possessing a
similar haunting fascination.
Mr. W. J. Wainwright's Captive showed his usual
scholarly and highly finished art ; while Mr. Robert W.
Allen gave a typical rural landscape in Winter, U.S.A.,
the clearness of the atmosphere which distinguishes
America from England being well suggested. Mr. J. W.
North's Study fur " The Bride in Blue " showed refined
and tender handling, the general colour being carefully re-
strained to lead up to the one poignant note in the picture,
a patch of blue which gleamed like a jewel in an appro-
priate setting. The Venus ami Adonis of Mr. Claude A.
Shepperson was a Boucher-like subject set down with
grace and refinement in glowing autumnal colour. Of
the several fine examples by Mr. Harry Watson, his
Evening Light was perhaps the most noteworthy. It
represented a quiet river bank shaded over by dark
foliage, in the midst of which a single tree was flooded by
a shaft of golden light, making its trunk and leaves flame
into brilliant colour. The effect was realised with full
truth but without exaggeration. In this and his other
work-.. Evening Light and A Tale of Romance, Mr.
Watson had invested his work with a romantic sentiment
which recalled the feel ing of the early pre- Raphaelite artists.
SOIIO PI il I ERA'
The National
Portrait Society
Modern portrait
painters would do
well to remember that
originality, like genius,
is a spontaneous
growth. In the exhi-
bition of the National
Portrait Society, at
the Grosvenor Gallery,
forgetfulness of this
fact was apparent in
much of the work
shown. There were
numerous examples in
which the artists had
tried to ge nerate
originality by a sedu-
lous avoidance of any
likeness to orthodox
contemporary painting
and a studied neglect
of nature. Such work
is ephemeral, having
neither value as a
historical record nor
as a piece of good art.
Mr. Augustus John's
Two D i s e i p 1 e s, an
essay in the Grasco-
Roman manner of
the Egyptian mummy-
case painters of the
third century, or his Fisher Lad, in the Florentine style
of the fifteenth century, and Mr. Walter Sickert's Por-
trait of a wooden-visaged man looming through a dark
mist, were only interesting as eccentricities. There were
other works to which a similar description can be ap-
plied, but the offending artists were scarcely of sufficient
note for their influence to be seriously detrimental to
the cause of art. Both of Mr. W. Strang's two ex-
amples. The Mirror and the Red Fez, had been seen
before. The latter was a well-characterised portrait of
the artist, free of affectation, in which full justice had
been done to atmospheric values. The two last criti-
cisms applied with equal force to The Mirror, a picture
showing a girl holding out her skirts, with an attendant
in the background. The canvas, however, appeared
too small for the composition, the significance of the
action of the principal figure being not easily compre-
hended owing to the lower portion being cut off by the
frame.
Mr. 1'hilip Connard's William Cleveley Alexander,
Esq., was as much a genre picture as a portrait. The
artist is among the few who can introduce strongly
painted accessories in his work without detracting from
the pictorial interest of his sitters. This was shown both
in his Clown and the Portrait of a Child, but in these
the sitters were only given due prominence at the cost
54
Current Art Notes
of some crudity and exaggeration in the tlesli- tones,
which in Mr. Connard:s works too frequently have the
appearance of being realised in patches of red and white
brought into tone with lamp-black. In the portrait of
Mr. Alexander he had entirely avoided this; the flesh-
tones were set down in full purity, the numerous objects
contained in the corner of the room where he was seated
were realised with absolute local truth, and the picture
attained that feeling of minute completeness which
characterises the work of the Dutch seventeenth-century
masters in genre. .Mr. F. C. 15. Cadell's Poet showed
good quality in much of the colour, but the work was too
sketchy for the scale on which it was executed. A half-
length entitled Mallows, by Mrs. Laura Knight, gave
an attractive portrait of a pretty girl standing in full
sunlight. Mr. John Lavery's Maria Carmi was merely
an impression, boldly handled and well characterised,
but still a sketch rather than a work carried to full com-
pletion ; his Lord Edward Grosvenor was hardly carried
further, and lacked much of the charm of the other owing
to the brush-work being less spontaneous in feeling and
less explicit. A Portrait Fantasy by Miss Inez Adam
was original and characterised by good colour, and the
latter quality, in a greater degree, was the crowning
merit of Mr. Augustus John's portrait of Miss Iris Tree.
This picture showed enough of Mr. John's former
mastery to make one wish that he would cease produc-
ing eccentricities and again do justice to his undeniable
talent. The drawing, if summary, was true as far as it
went, and the colour-scheme — in green, brown, and white
— both original and fascinating. Though it was not a
great picture, it had the makings of one. There were
attractive and animated portraits of Miss A". Mayer, by
Mr. W. Russell, and Miss Katherine Robb, by Mr.
Oswald Birley. Mr. P. A. de Laszlo had several exam-
ples in the style which he appears to have made his
own, the head of the sitter, with sufficient background to
fully separate it from the canvas, only being realised, and
the remainder of the work more or less left blank. This
style lends itself to Mr. Laszlo's fluent brush-work, and
he adapted it with considerable success to his portraits of
Sir Philip Sassoon and the Dowager Lady Leconfield.
Its disadvantage is that it does not allow for the fullest
expression of art. In the present-day fashion for swift,
fluent, and spontaneous expression, we forget that, though
brevity may be the soul of wit, it is not necessarily the
proof of the possession of great knowledge. A clever
man may condense his ideas on a subject into a ten
minutes' speech, but if he has nothing left unsaid he cannot
be well informed. It is the same in art ; much of the
modern impressionistic work is highly clever, but one often
wonders whether many of the painters who produce it
with such facility could carry it further without revealing
weaknesses, which would show them to be mil master
craftsmen, but merely gifted amateurs. These remarks
do not, of course, apply to Mr. Laszlo, who is undoubted-
ly one of our most competent and attractive portrait
painters ; yet one must deem his example bad, as likelj
tn bung into vogue a style of ait which will effectually
help a faulty executant to conceal his shortcomings,
The Royal
Society of
British Artists
FEWER and more interesting pictures were the order
of the day at the 143rd exhibition of the Royal Society of
British Artists (Suffolk Street). The
entrance wall of the central gallery
was rather unduly monopolised by Mr.
Fred F. Foottet's large landscape in
crimson. Three bare tree-trunks were boldly silhouetted
against what appeared to be a universal conflagration.
Out of such ingredients Mr. Foottet had produced a
work which attracted the eye without delighting it. The
other works about were overpowered by the hot mass of
colour, and Mr. L. ( '.ricr's truthful and quiet-toned Rei
Harbour, which hung immediately beneath, was made to
appear unduly blue. Of the two black-backgrounded
figure subjects by Mr. Francis E. Hodge, The Repartee
was the more effective, by reason of the scarlet bodice
of the subject, which told up well against its setting. The
backgrounds, however, were a mistake : they gave an
artificial appearance to the pictures, the crisp brush-work
and good colour of which needed no such adventitious
aid. Mr. Alec Carruthers Could was not seen to advan-
tage in /'//.' Thanhs at Richmond ; it was not strong, but
merely a crude and unfinished piece of work. Much
better was his Constable-like drawing. The Old Weir at
Punster, Somerset. There was less sparkle about the
high lights than Constable would have realised, yet in its
sincerity and unforced strength of tone and colour it was
not unworthy of him. Mr. Christopher Williams's por-
trait of the Chancellor 0/ the Exchequer was dignified and
forceful, though the handling was heavy and uninspired.
Other portraits included Mrs. /ordain, by Mr. R. ('..
Eaves, which held its own against any similar work in
the exhibition. The sitter was well posed and pleasing 1\
characterised, the flesh-tones true, and her dress and the
accessories painted with sufficient detail to make them
interesting without being obtrusive. Another pleasing
work was Miss Dorothy Pay, by Mr. J. J. Alsop ; and the
Tamaraoi Mr. Frederick Whiting was somewhat over-
powered by the strength of its background, the deep
blues constituting the latter appearing to demand more
carnations in the flesh-tones to keep them in their place.
The work, if not quite a success, was a step in the right
direction, and far more interesting than many of the
portraits which reach their goals along orthodox paths
of conventionality. The effect of the well-characterised
head of The Right Reverend C. II. dill. Bishop of Travan-
,ete and Cochin, was somewhat marred by the aggressive
cleanliness of the whites in the sitter's surplice ; while
Mr. Stephen Reid saw too much detail when painting his
portrait of John Kerr, Esq. One would say this was pro
bably an admirable likeness, absolutely sincere and un-
fettered, but broader treatment would have enhanced it-~
pictorial qualities. Going back again to orthodox pictures
as distinguished from portraits, one may congratulate Mr.
Hal Hurst on having made a marked advance in his
picture' ni the Xbsent One. The theme was sentimental,
a girl probably a governess— leaning in a hope 1
reverie against a large globe, unheedful of the lettei I
at her feet; but Mr. Hurst had not depended upon the
sentiment of the picture for its attraction. The work was
The Connoisseur
soundly painted, and its lighting, colour, and arrangement
were all well managed. Another interior scene was Mr.
W. M. Palin's Improvisante, in which a girl was per-
forming in a high-galleried room before a circle of her
friends. The figures were well drawn and well grouped":
the colouring, somewhat
over-grey in tone, was
nevertheless pleasing;
only a lack of interest in
the upper part of the pic-
ture marred an otherwise
successful work. Good
colour was shown in the
three smaller contribu-
tions of Mr. J. H. Amsche-
witz, and also in his Aged
Worldling. The latter,
an elaborate and highly
finished work, would have
gained had the artist left
it more simple. Mr. John
Muirhead's Thames at
Greenwich gave a pleas-
ing represent at i on of a
well-known theme, the
bright sunlight on the
water forming an effec-
tive contrast against the
dark forms of barges in
the foreground. Another picture in which sunshine was
used with effect was Mr. A. St. John McColl's Golden
Autumn, Brittany, which showed an array of brightly
arrayed fruit-stalls backed by an expanse of sun-gilded
autumnal foliage. The picture, without being aggres-
sive, glowed with colour. Mr. Charles \V. Simpson's
pictures of bird-life, despite the naturalism of their out-
look, attained distinction by a certain Japanese quality
in their arrangement. While sufficiently true to life to
please a naturalist, they also formed highly decorative
pieces of work, well balanced, and simple and reposeful
in colour and feeling. Among the landscapes may be
mentioned The Deer Park, Sussex, by Mr. W. Westley
Manning, well painted but a little monotonous in colour ;
Mr. Murray Urquhart's fresh Autumn Breezes; Mr. D.
Murray Smith's sweet-toned Near Caerphilly, S. Wales :
Mr. Tatton Winter's Long Coppice and the Hill on the
Dunes, Staples, t higinal composition was shown in the
Hill of the Quarries, by Mr. Harry W. Adams, where a
line of tall poplars were shown soaring skywards, backed
by a ridge of hills culminating in a steep sun-flooded
blurt". The picture glowed with refulgent colour; it was
finely harmonised, reposeful in feeling, and attained the
distinction of being one of the most completely satisfying
works in the exhibition.
PLATE BY MESSRS. WEDGWOOD, NJNSTAL]
THE second exhibition of the London Group, at the
Goupil Gallery 5, Regent Street , was in-
teresting as a psychological phenomena.
Moreover, it was highly educational.
Such a display was essential to complete the chastening
The London
Group
of our pride in twentieth-century civilisation. The war
has shown that its possession does not necessarily endow
the man of " Kultur " with higher moral sensibilities than
the barbarian ; while the works of Mr. Jacob Epstein and
others of the London Group revealed that the aesthetic
tendencies of the most
■advanced school of
modern art are leading
us back to the primitive
instincts of the savage
and of the young child
whose education is still
to be commenced. It is
best to speak frankly
about these productions,
because they have at-
tracted an amount of in-
terest altogether out of
proportion to their in-
trinsic merits. As works
of art the majority of
them were too foolish
even to provoke laughter.
They had neither origi-
nality of conception not-
able craftsmanship to
commend them ; and yet
that they had been pro-
duced in all seriousness,
and accepted in the same spirit by a large number of
intelligent people, who professed both to admire and
understand them, need astonish no one who has studied
social history.
The relaxation of orthodox intellectual standards in
favour of anything that is strange, marvellous, or esoteric-
occurs in all communities, whether civilised or barbarian.
Thus the belief in mascots, prevalent in modern society,
is only a more polite form of the fetish-worship of the
West African native. Both equally arise from the revolt
of the uncultivated imagination against the dominion of
the intellect. One finds the most pronounced examples
of this among young children. Their fancies are less
trammelled by the intellect than those of grown-up people,
hence they not infrequently dominate the mind more
strongly than the realities of life. Thus a formless toy
becomes often endowed with imaginary attributes which
render it an object of ardent affection. One does not
find the same wealth of affection lavished on a more
elaborate toy, because the greater definition of form in
the latter allows less scope for the uncultivated imagi-
nation. Thus a rag doll can be made to personify any
character, whereas a well-modelled lead soldier can
only be a soldier, and makes no appeal to a child
wholly ignorant of military matters. As with children,
so with adults. The uncultivated imagination requires
a more primitive form of art to stimulate it than the cul-
tured imagination. An aborigine, to whom the Venus
of Milo or Leonardo's Last Supper would make no
appeal, might be moved to ecstasy at the sight of a
barber's pole ; its simple yet symmetrical shape, its gaudy
56
^'#^:
i
PORTRAIT OF LADY SKIPWITH
BY SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS, I'.R.A.
In the H. C. Frick Collection
^, -I
.^^H
wtX '^^B
^jj^
\1
v. I
a
Curren t Art A 'otes
coloration, and its unlikeness to any natural object,
appearing to him as something at once attractive and
mysterious ; destitute in themselves of any significance.
yet capable of bearing any interpretation he may choose
to apply to them.
These elementary .esthetic fancies of the young child
and the primitive savage are not wholly dead in the
breast of the civilised adult, and Mr. Jacob Epstein and
his colleagues boldly catered for them. It was not a
difficult task. All that was necessary was to substitute
a crude naivete for artistic feeling and craftsmanship, and
to make creations which could be fully comprehended
without tasking either the imagination or the intellect.
These ends were attained by Mr. Epstein by invest-
ing his sculpture with only the faintest suggestion of a
meaning. The titles in the catalogue conveyed far more
of his intention than his chisel. His work was merely
a peg upon which the spectators might hang their own
fancies. The most elementary manifestation of it was in
the group of the Mother and Child. This was composed
of a rudely shaped ovai spheroid, representing the head
of the mother, and a smaller circular one which stood for
that of the child. Their features were suggested by a
few crude markings. Mr. Epstein's admirers might cite
this as an example of extreme synthesis, but the term
would not be justified. Synthesis means a building up
of the general from the particular ; but here there had
been no building up. At its best the work could only be
regarded as an elementary and easily understood symbol.
It was an affectation to perpetrate it in marble. A South
Sea islander would have more fully conveyed the same
idea with a couple of cocoa-nuts ; an English nurse-girl
by padding out some pieces of calico with rags. Mr.
Epstein's mannikin, entitled Cursed be the Day wherein I
:,\m born, was better in this respect. It was fashioned
in wood, the upper portion of the structure coloured
red, and the two straight pieces of wood, which did duty
for legs, in grey. The figure suggested a little boy
in stockings vociferously protesting against having the
remainder of his raiment put on.
Mr. Epstein's productions had at least the merit of re-
motely suggesting the forms, if not the ideas, he intended
to convey. So much could not be urged in favour of
the paintings either of Mr. Edward Wadsworth 01 Mr.
Wyndham Lewis. One by the former was an arrange
inent of diagonal bars of paint black, white, red, blue,
and yellow — arranged in parallels, and as neatly set
out .is if executed with the aid of a rule and a p
compasses. The artist called it Blackpool. The only
thing it remotely suggested was an 1
pole. The Crowd, bj Mr. Wyndham Lewis, appeared
to be a ground-plan of innumerable series of cells without
It was drawn with geometrical accuracy and
neatly coloured, and might have passed for a plan exc-
cuted by some erratic architect's draughtsman. 1 >ne
might examine in detail the other works shown in the
exhibition, but the task would be repaid by tl
i>l little shown nation, art, ernment, or
efficient craftsmanship. Some of the members essayed
an obvious and rather brutal realism: oth(
impressionistic colour arrangements, in which harmony
had been attained at the cost of truth: while the majority
were content to be merely eccentric.
TO write a review of the exhibition of the Royal Insti-
ll Painters in Water-Colours is always a formidable
task to the critic. There is probabl)
The Royal no display in the country at which the
"s ' u , works show a more consistent avei
Painters in ,. .,., . ,
„ , iiu.ihtv. I he ma 1 or it v ot them are
Water-Colours ' ' , ,
lullv worthy of review, and but few
single themselves out as worthy of higher commend. 1
than their companions. Thus the critic is reduced to
making arbitrary choice perforce, the exigencies of space
compelling him to pass over much that he would other-
like to mention. The 106th exhibition of the
Society Piccadilly appeared to be practically unaffected
by the war, showing no falling oft" from its immediate
predecessors. In the first gallery Mr. Fred Rues
From Love to Duty — another of his representations
of Nelson and Lady Hamilton — struck one as being
unfortunately hung, it being isolated in the midst oi
a group of small pictures, the more minute execution
of which adversely affected its appearance. The picture
was marked by an advance in colour quality on any of
his previous work, and only just failed attaining high
harmonic excellence. The dominant notes in the back-
ground and middle distance were blue, white, and green ;
the latter being afforded by the foliage of the garden,
white serving as an environment of the figures, and
the blue of the sky and the white of the profusion of
fruit blossoms being repeated in the blue and white of
Nelson's uniform. In the foreground a contrasting note
was afforded by the yellow of Lady Hamilton's gown.
who was reclining on a dark grey cloak laid on the grass.
The grey of the cloak appeared the one jarring element
in the work; it tended to isolate the figure of Lady
Hamilton from the rest of the composition, and served
no good purpose. Mr. T. C. Gotch had a well-painted
single figure picture entitled '/'he Listener, good in tone
and colour but a little wanting in interest. Mi. W. B.
Woollen's Retreat from Mom «,h .1 spirited rendering of
the charge of the v in that battle. Another
wai like subject was depicted in Mr. Norman Wilkin-
French Battleships, the ungainly massiveness of the
marine monsters, far heavier in their appearance than
their English prototype well conveyed. Sir James
D. Linton's highly finished art was seen t.> advantage in
his Message St. Valentine's Day, and his larger compo-
sition, Only a Scrap of Paper. The lattei had noth
h the Belgian treaty, Inn represented a couple ol
g to some 1 In 1st;. in in.'
1st the infringement of a treat) they were holding
up to him. The attitudes of the figures were natural
and 1 :1 "ell arranged, and the
draperies and . ea painted with all
hip ami deft realisation ot
textures which >:k of tin
Mr. Frank Spenlovi - Watching and Waiting
shovvi m fishermen's
59
The Connoisseu
watching over a rough sea for the return of their hus-
bands. The scene was impressively realised in sombre.
]«>w -toned colours, to which the white caps of the women
afforded a contrasting" note. Another coast scene, but
one of a more cheerful character, was Mr. G. Hillyard
Swinstead's rendering of waves breaking in bright sun-
shine on Splash Point, Seaford. The transparent colours
of the water, the whiteness of the sun-transfused foam and
chalk cliffs against the blue sky, all helped to make a
pleasing and effective picture. Miss D. \V. Hawksley's
Daughter of [aims was a presentment of a well-worn
theme in an entirely novel setting. The figures and their
environment appeared to be more Chinese than Jewish.
but whatever their archaeological correctness, Mis^ Hawks-
ley had succeeded in combining them into a quaint,
original, and interesting composition, marked by a fine
feeling for colour. A carefully painted drawing of Still
Life was by Miss Dorothy Smirke. Mr. Percy Dixon's
Passing Showers and Mr. |. Shaw Crompton's New
Tenant both deserved mention ; as did Mr. Yeend King's
fresh-cole Hired Mill mi the Coast of the Isle of Man and
his crisply handled ) 'outh and Spring. A completely
new departure was made by Mr. Wynne Apperley in his
Playmates and Pan in Ambush, the broad realism of his
usual manner giving place to a highly elaborated tech-
nique somewhat reminiscent of the Florentine fifteenth-
century school. The venture was to be welcomed as
helping to reinstate in modern art a style ot work which
demands searching and exact draughtsmanship, highly
finished execution, and is imbued with romantic feeling.
In both pictures Mr. Apperley had succeeded in estab-
lishing that illusion of reality which is more precious
than reality itself. He admitted us to the land of
romance ; its beauties were pictured with a minute care
which elaborated every detail. The Playmates was
perhaps the more attractive of the two drawings, the
figures in it being larger, and so better proportioned
to the size of the work. In both subjects, however, the
artist had achieved a striking success. Despite the
jewelled elaboration of his colour, he had succeeded in
preserving the unity of his conceptions. The colour was
finely harmonised and the draughtsmanship searching
ami exact.
Mr. William Wai.cot is showing a collection of his
works in Edinburgh just now, at Messrs. Doig, Wilson
and Wheatley's ; and the Royal
Edinburgh : The
Diploma Gallery
Scottish Academy, determined not
to be les-, charitable than any
analogous institutions, have organised, at their own
Diploma Gallery, an exhibition on behalf of needy Bel-
gian artists. Mr. Walcot's productions consist entirely
of water-colours and etchings, and they are pleasant and
interesting, not, perhaps, because they are of a really
high order, but inasmuch as they reflect distinct develop-
ment on the part of an artist of individual outlook. For
his paintings, contrasted with those he has shown in the
past, manifest that his colour- sense is becoming more
searching and more subtle ; while studying his etching-.,
these reveal a greater confidence in himself than he
has usually evinced heretofore, his draughtsmanship in
several instances having a new semblance of spontaneity,
a new freedom. In no case, however, is he unduh
free ; and indeed many of his prints appeal chiefly by
their precision, always rather an engaging quality in
etching.
In their anxiety to make their project a success, the
Academicians have wisely invited Scottish artists in
general to co-operate with them. Nor has this request
been made in vain, a large number of painters and
sculptors having come forward, each presenting one or
more works ; and these are to be distributed ultimately
in the manner of a raffle, the price of a ticket therefor
being five guineas. The whole idea is a good one ; the
demand for tickets has proved abundant, and the gallery
is daily attracting a phenomenal number of visitors ; while
if the writer is forced to admit — despite the patent de-
sirability of eschewing harsh criticism in a case like this
— that the generality of things on the walls is only
mediocre, a few of them are quite the reverse, a few-
do ample justice to their respective artists. Mr. Eric
Robertson, who usually paints figure-studies or land-
scapes, has broken new ground with an essay in still-life;
and it shows, certainly, that he has a genuine gift for that
field of art, so perennially fascinating to painters them-
selves, albeit so unpopular with the laity. Mr. Patrick
Adam exhibits a pleasing interior, remarkable, as this
artist's work generally is, for its able and convincing
suggestion of light ; while Mr. Louis Ginnett's Reverie.
a study of a girl seated in an arm-chair, claims notice by
reason of good design, although the modelling of the
girl's arms leaves much to be desired. Almost flawless
in its own slight way, on the other hand, is a little flower-
piece by Mr. Edwin Alexander ; and a touch as delicate
as his is embodied in Miss Cecile Walton's Fantasy, yet
another thing of considerable charm being Miss Meg
Wright's Cosy Corner. The subject is a fox-terrier,
sound asleep ; and all is figured with an exceptional
sympathy, which would have appealed to Crawhall him-
self, that arch-master of dog-painting.
Landscapes predominate in the gallery, and among
them are good canvases by Messrs. Wilson Cowan and
W. V. MacGregor, James Hector, Herbert Gunn, and
George Houston ; while a Tangier scene, the work of
Mr. John Lavery, evokes regret that he, nowadays,
virtually confines himself to portraiture. An Italian
picture by Mr. John Duncan, again, enshrines really (inl-
and strong handling of the eternal beauty of chiaros-
curo ; and Mr. W. B. Hole shows a landscape which is
quite surprising, so far ahead is it of his familiar etchings
and mural paintings. Here, in addition to rich and deep
colours, happily blended, is a vivid reincarnation of a
fleeting and romantic mood of nature.
But there is one picture at the exhibition which easily
transcends all the others, one which no Edinburgh
people, caring seriously for painting, should fail to go
and see ; and this comes from the brush of Sir James
Guthrie, whose topic is a young girl, dressed in black,
her shoulder garnished daintily with a pink flower, a fan
in her hand, and behind her a brownish wall. It is an
do
( urn- tit Art Notes
early canvas, presumably, being wrought in that fairlj
elliptical style which, foreign to his output of to-day.
Sir James was wont to practise fifteen or twenty years
ago, at which time he was something of a disciple of
the French Impressionists. And he himself, no doubt,
would call his work only a sketch ; while some may
criticise its drawing, some may cavil to the effect that the
actual sense of life is slight. Vet is there not, in certain
sketches, a charm which finished paintings are prone to
lack? And among these sketches is the present one;
while none, surely, will be found to deny the inherent
beauty of each separate note of colour, or the exquisite-
ness of the harmony evolved from them. Fortunate, in
truth, will be the person who acquires so delightful, so
essentially decorative a work for no more than five
guineas. But one must refrain from mentioning financial
matters on an occasion like this, for, though main- rich
collectors are apt to forget it, a fine picture, like a tine
poem or piece of music, is not a thing to be appraised in
figures.
of allegorical meaning is suggested in the figures ami
objects which go to form the patterning. The sun
the centre, and around it are grouped figures einbleinat u
of i\\e of the seven senses. Sight i ted by the
graceful maiden, bearing a lamp ; smell, by anothei
holding a rose to her nostrils; a third, whose m
enclasped by the arms of a winged cupid, personifie
touch. To represent taste a male figure is introduced,
a mediaeval cellarer, draining a glass <>! wine; while the
quintette is completed by the huntsman, blowing a horn,
who represents hearing. Together with these leading
figures are introduced a number of other objects, flowers,
birds, and animals, which all help to heighten and amplify
the allegorical significance of the patterning. This
design, though it might be matched by other-- for various
materials, may be taken as worthil) representing the
finished elaboration of Walter Crane's style and his
sedulous care to make his art complete in little things
.1- well as in great.
The death of Mr. Walter Crane on Sunday, March
14th, deprived English art of one of its most gifted and
The late
Walter Crane
versatile exponents. He was born in
Liverpool on August 15th, 1845, but
had little connection otherwise with the
great northern city, his father, when the bo\ was still
young, migrating first to Torquay and afterwards to
London. From him Walter Crane learnt the rudiments
of ait, and showed such decided talent that W. J. Linton,
the well-known wood engraver, took him as apprentice
without the payment of the usual premium. Crane-
probably imbibed his socialistic opinions from his master.
an ardent ad\ocate of political freedom. He essayed
painting as well as drawing and engraving, and when
in his seventeenth year had his first work hung in the
Royal Academy, a picture of The Lady of Shalott. His
early successes, however, were won as a book illustrator,
and it was not until the establishment of tin- first Gros-
venor Gallery that Crane achieved fame as a painter.
In this institution he exhibited many of his principal
works, including The Renascence of Venus and the Fa/e
of Persephone, pictures that did much to establish his
reputation. All his pictorial work was marked by a
noble idealism and an instinctive decorative feeling. In
[879 he joined the Science and Art Department at
South Kensington, and was appointed as art examiner.
Probably few men were better fitted for the position, for
( 'rane, besides being an able painter and book illustrator,
showed himself a master in nearly every department of
decorative art. Some of his designs foi tapestrj were
executed by William Morris, and proved to be among the
most successful products of the latter's loom. He < 0
designed patterns for textile fabrii 5, deftl) adapting high
artistic principles to the practical requirements of the
manufacturer. A characteristii essay in this directioi
is the design for the table 1 loth reprodui ed, which illus-
trates both the romantic feeling of Ins art and his ability
to make it subserve the end of industry. A wealth
Artistic
Table-ware
1 INK of the highest signs of culture is when the USi fu
objects of life — those which the owner has to see and
handle everyday — are executed with the
same careful craftsmanship and regard
to art as objei ts which are intended
purely for ornament. The former are ^n essential pari
of life, the latter merely an adjunct. One may thus
welcome the increased efforts of the Staffordshire potters
to evolve more beautiful household utensils. Among the
firms who are achieving success in this direction are
Messrs. Wedgwood Ov. Co., of Tunstall, and the Soho
Pottery Co., of Cobridge, who are at present largel;
specialising in table-ware. In this branch of ceramii
art English makes have always maintained a leading
position since the eighteenth century. The nineteenth
century was marked 1>\ an even higher technical per-
fection of their wares, though the form and patterning
of the latter perhaps rather dete ated. The present
idea is tn follow on the traditions of the beautiful old
patternings and designs and apply them to the su] 1
modern wares. In this both linns have been especially
1 jsful. Their porcelain, in its translucencj . e\ enness
of surface, and perfe tion of finish, rivals the best that
has been produced; and the designs with which it is
ornamented, some borrowed from formei great makers,
and others which are quite new. are invariablj at
and tasteful. A feature of the work is the high quality
(liits coloration, the tints used surviving tin ordi il of
the firing with undimmed purity and lustre.
A 1 Leigh, in Surrey, is a charming specimen ol .11.
i ish country-house, which ha been constructed from
the mi 1 11 hi two old cottages built
Tudor House, n |(i_, anrf dem<)| |i(.(,
e«g t urrey ^^ ^ ^ ^ material be n : pre
served ami used in the- present building. The house
s furnished in keeping with its character, ami contains
.1 quantity of antique furniture, pewter, et< . whilst the
01
The Connoisseur
DESIGN FOR A TABLE-CLOTH
BY THE LATE WALTER CRANK
beautiful old-world gardens cost no less than ,£1,500 to
lay out. The total area of the estate, which includes a
small farm, is about five acres. Messrs. Harrods, Ltd.,
tn whom this beautiful residence has been entrusted for
freehold sale, state that it can be viewed at any time by
appointment.
A WELL-ILLUSTRATED catalogue of modern furniture is
sent by Messrs. Williamson & Cole, Ltd. (High Street,
Clapham. S.W.). A feature of the
volume is the number of plates in colour,
which give a very adequate idea of the
patterns and colours of cretonnes and curtains, and also
include illustrations of a number of furnished rooms.
Another useful feature of the catalogue is that a large
number of actual patterns of various textiles are inserted.
The book illustrates a wide variety ot furniture and
Furniture
Catalogues
furniture materials, the designs for which are generally
attractive and marked by good taste, in many instances
the pieces appearing to be directly reproduced from fine
models by eighteenth and early nineteenth - century
makers.
Messrs. Fraser& Co. 1 Antique Galleries, Union Street,
Inverness' forward an interesting illustrated catalogue
of antique furniture. The wares enumerated include
some fine examples of old silver and Sheffield plate, a
good collection of Chippendale and Hepplewhite chairs,
and a large assortment of earlier pieces and old English
china. Among what may be described as oddments are
several Jacobite and other interesting historical records,
including gloves once belonging to Sir Philip Sydney
and Queen Anne Boleyn. A speciality of the firm is old
Highland furniture and weapons, of which a large number
of items are included.
62
I'/ic Connoisseur
VALUATION AND
CORRESPONDENCE DEPARTMENT
Special Notice
Enquiries should be made upon the coupon which will be found in the advertisement pages. While,
owing to our increased correspondence and the fact that The Connoisseur is printed a month before
publication, it is impossible for us to guarantee in every case a prompt reply in these columns, an
immediate reply will be sent by post to all readers who desire it, upon payment of a nominal fee. Expert
opinions and valuations can be supplied when objects are sent to our offices for inspection, and, where
necessary, arrangements can be made for an expert to examine single objects and collections in the country
and give advice, the fee in all cases to be arranged beforehand. Objects sent to us may be insured whilst
they are in our possession, at a moderate cost. All communications and good:, should be addressed to the
"Manager of Enquiry Dept., The Connoisseur, 35-39, Maddox Street, W."
ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS
Engravings and Etchings.
"Return from Coursing," by Cardon, after
Hamilton. — A9,226 (Brecon). — The value of your engraving
of the above is about £$.
"Wooded Scene," engraved by At. C. Prestel. —
A9,264 (Penrith). — You say that your print is by Prestel, alter
Hobbema, but we are wondering if you have confused it with
■Gainsborough's Forest, published in 1799. Without seeing it,
we should place the value of the print at a comparatively low
sum, say under £1. The other two engravings referred to are
of no collector's value.
"Napoleon le Grand," by Bertrand, after David.
— A9.2S6 (Cork). — The value of your print, if uncoloured, is
about 30s,
"The Dead Soldier," by J. Heath, after J. Wright.
— A9,292 (Ambleside). — We think that you have somewhat
overestimated the value of your print, all the more so since it
has been mounted and stained, which seriously affects its value
from a collector's point of view.
"Marriage a la Mode," by Earlom, after Hogarth.
— A9,3io (Ukley). — As you are aware, the two plates referred
to are part of a set. We cannot say definitely without seeing a
specimen, but at present we should be inclined to place the value
of the engravings at about £2 2s. each, from your description.
The book referred to is of no collector's value.
Furniture.
Mirror. — A9,i9i (Brynmawr). — It is, of course, impossible
to judge from your photograph whether the mirror ol carved
pinewood, gilt, is a genuine antique, but the style is that
prevalent about 1760. If original, the mirror might be worth
,£10 ios. or ,£i2 I2s.
Bracket Clock. Ao,22.s [Stroud), You an- correel m
assigning your clock to the Empire period oi decoration, but we
cannot tell from the sketch whether it is genuine. This style is
often reproduced, and a modern copy can be acquired foi ^,4 4s.
or £5 Ss- ^ °" <'" ""l slate the makei ol the clock, moreover,
which is, of course, a mosl important [joint.
Clock by W. B. Romoli, Paris.— Ag,264 (Penrith).—
We must see a photograph of this clock in its porcelain case by
Jacob Petit before attempting to give an opinion on it.
Jacobean Chest of Drawers. -Ac.,314 (Newbury).— The
correct handles for a genuine antique Jacobean chest of drawei
should be either verysmall round knobs, or else small peardrop
handles. It is comparatively seldom, however, that .1 piece
of furniture of this period is absolutely perfect in this respect.
Pictures and "Painters.
Water-Colours, signed D. Cox. — A9,226 (Brecon). —
It is quite impossible for any opinion 10 lie passed upon these
without an inspection of the drawings themselves. Of late
there has been a remarkable quantity of copies or imitatio
the artist's work on the market, and Tin: CONNOISSEUR has
been the means of exposing one of the factories which turned
out large numbers of spurious imitations. It is always better if
the original picture can be seen for purposes of valuation, and
in this case it is absolutely essential.
In Volume XII. of The Connoisseur, on page 55, appeared
an interesting letter from Sir Whitworth Wallis on forgeries,
in which the following remarks were made: — "Thedra>
. vary in size from S by 6 in. to 15 by 12 in.
The paper is artificially stained and worn down at the edges,
and in -mie ca-.es the mark* or circles of the drawing pins are
left. Occasionally old pieces of newspaper are glued round the
edges and back lo indicate that they have been removed from
their frames. Each one is signed in full, and in the earliei
examples seen by me some ycai> ago, the signature bears but
little resemblance to Cox's genuine handwriting, bul in the
course of time the forgery is growing slightly more like the
original."
On page 1S6 of the same volume we primed > note com-
mencing, " 1 fur reader-, will be pleased 10 learn that the article
on David Cox forgeries in the May Connoissi i b 1:i assisted
[lie police in bringing the culprits to justice," etc. There can
be little doubt but what was threatening to become a 1
hindrance 10 the ait world was crushed by means of the activities
created in our columns.
Painting by Brandt. Acj,227 (Leeds). — Judging from
your letter, it seems quite possible thai you are confusing the
work of two Dutch 1 mely,N. Brandt, who lived <
the seventeenth century, and was an imttatoi ol V
Albert Jonas Brandt, ■> painter of still-life subjects, " hi
born in 17S8, ami died in 1S21.
Identity of Artists. Aq.2/,1 (Halifax). — The artists
about whom you make enquiry air as follow--: — Ignttci
Iriarte, Spanish painter of landscapes, born 1620, died
f'.ngel Sam, Dutch portrait painter, bom 1699, died 1769: and
Nicolas I'.crtin, lunch painter ol historical subjects,
IOO7, did I I736.
Drawing by Augustus Wei by Pugin. A
(London, W.), — Your pen-drawing ol Si. Mary's, Livei
(inferior), signed with the monogram of Augustus Welb) 1
is evidently a genuine work from the hand ol the famous I
revivalist. It is interesting, moreover, that you should also
possess the lithograph done after the drawii bly, we
should think, by Day. It is difficult to appraise a value in a
case like this, and we should suggest that a selling price would
In- .1 ni.iitci for arrangemenl betwe> th ntn ng parties.
HE CONNOISSEVR.
GENEALOGICAL AND
IDIC DEPARJMENT
Special Notice
Readers of The Connoisseur who desire to take advantage of the opportunities offered herein should
address all letters on the subject to the Manager of the Heraldic Department, Hanover Buildings, 35-39,
Maddox Street, W.
Only replies that may be considered to be of general interest will be published in these columns. Those
of a directly personal character, or in cases where the applicant may prefer a private answer, will be dealt
with by post.
Readers who desire to have pedigrees traced, the accuracy of armorial bearings enquired into, or other-
wise to make use of the department, will be charged fees according to the amount of work involved.
Particulars will be supplied on application.
When asking information respecting genealogy or heraldry, it is desirable that the fullest details, so far
as they may be already known to the applicant, should be set forth.
Essington. — Arms were granted to William and Thomas
Essington, sons of John Essington, late of Cowley, near Essing-
ton, co. Gloucester, descended from the elder of two houses of
that surname and family, on the 2S July, 1610, by Sir William
Segar, Knt. They are as follows: sa. five lozenges conjoined
in cross or. Crest : a cubit arm erect ppr. , the hand grasping a
lozenge or.
H a 1 FHIDE. — The arms you mention, viz., arg. two chev-
ronels, one reversed, interlaced, sa. on a chief az., three cinque-
foils or, pierced of the third, were confirmed, and a crest granted
in 1 569, to Edward Halfhide, of Aspden, co. Herts, son of James
Halthide, of Vardley, in the same county. The crest is : a grey-
hound sej. or, collared az., rim, stud, and ring of the first.
Hemus. — This name is to be found in Worcestershire. A
Daniel Hemus, son of John Hemus, of Stourbridge, was at
Balliol College, Oxford, in 1737; while John, son of Joshua
Hemus, of the same place, matriculated at All Souls' College,
19 October, 1771, aged 18. This John was Rector of Padworth,
Berks., in 1S01, and of Putlenham, Surrey, in 1803, until his
death in 1823. The ordinary works of reference do not give
any arms for this family.
Paki.hv. — Lieut. Parlby, R.N., married Sophia Sylvester,
daughter of Captain Holland, 44th Regiment, of Marlborough
Cottage, Erompton, at St. Pancras, the 14 February, 1825.
YoUDE. — The Rev. Thomas Youde was Vicar of Higham,
co. Kent, and formerly Fellow of St. John's College : B.A. 1765;
M.A. 176S. The vicarage, worth ,£200 a year, was in the gift
of the Master and Fellows of St. John's.
I Iran hiridge. — Burkegives the following arms for this family :
ar. a bordure sa. ; on a canton gu. a fleur-de-lis of the field.
Arms on Dish. — The arms engraved on your dish are those
of the family of Loten, of St. James's, Westminster, co. Middle-
sex, and were granted in 1765. The family originally came from
Flanders. The arms quartering these of Lnten are those of
Van J uchen.
Alton. — The following is a short genealogical abstract of the
will of Sarah Alton, of Headge, in the parish of Duffield, co.
Derby, widow. Several copyhold messuages or tenements in
Twickenham, co. Middlesex, held of the manor of Islington
Syon. Son George Alton, of Headge, yeoman. Son Elias Alton.
Daughters Sarah and Elizabeth. Hannah Sims, of the borough
of Southwark, widow. Son Joseph, of Nottingham, tanner.
Son Thomas.
Witnesses : Ed. Wade : Den Fell.
Dated 5 June, 1747.
Proved I Tanuary, 1750.
(P.C.C. 1" Busby).
Burchett. — Will of William Burchett, Rector of Cleworth,
co. Berks., and Canon of Windsor. Sister Margaret, wife of
Jonathan Wells, Esq. Lands, etc., at Bonner Hill, near Little-
field, in the parish of Kingston, co. Surrey. William Harvest.
Roberts. The two daughters of the said Margaret
Wells. Freehold messuages in Silver Street, near Wood Street,
in the city of London. Brother Edward Burchett. Tenements
in Heathen Street, in the parish of Kingston aforesaid. . .
Crowder. Two daughters of the said brother. East India
Bond in the hands of Messrs. William and George Hatch, of
New Windsor, co. Berks. Friend, Mr. Chapman. Elizabeth,
wife of Thomas ( '.ill. Nephew, William Burchett.
Witnesses : Thos. Spencer: John Gill.
Dated 3 September, 1749.
Proved 7 January, 1750.
(P.C.C. 2" Busby).
Registered for transmission to Canada at Magazine Post Rates. Printed by Bemrose & Sons Ltd., 4 Snow Hill, London, E.C., and
Derby, and published by the Proprietors, Otto Ltd., at HANOVER BUILDINGS, 35 to 39 MADDOX STREET, LONDON. W., England.
Subscriptions— Inland 16/.. Foreign 17., to Canada 14/-. per annum. Published the 1st of each month. Published by Gordon & Qotch,
In Australia and New Zealand; by The Central News Agency, in South Africa; by Higginbotham & Co.. in Bombay and Calcutta; and
by The International News Co., in U.S.A.
THE ALPINE TRAVELLER
BY JAMES WARD, AFTER J. NORTHCOTE, R.A.
NE, 19I5-
Early Stuart Portraits By W. G. BlaiRie Murdoch
Thanks to the ineffable romance encircling
the royal Stuarts, a vast mass of writing has grown up
around them, the most voluminous of such writings
ng probably those dealing with Mary Mueen ol
Scots. There is hardly anything associated with her
but has been commemorated by some pen. and the
subject of her portraiture is no exception to this rule :
foi it has been handled at length by divers competent
antiquarians — notably Mr. J. J. Foster, Andrew
Lang, and Mr. Lionel Cust — and nowadays, in con-
sequence, there i- little doubt as to which of the
ountless pictures of the queen may be regarded as
aving 1 laims to authenticity. The portraits ol Mary s
fi irbears, on thecontrarj .
a topic on which but
little has been said as
and it is therefore
1 -ting to expi 1 1
5 on examining
- latter work-.
In treating of these
- has to tread with
aui ii tn. All the
a Stuarts wen keenl)
. ed in 1 he arts,
in studying the
, eval r. 1 ords oi the
nast) tin a< 1 ounts
i| the Lord 1 ligh Trea-
rer, and kindred doi
ments — on e frequently
m ross eferenci
to painting. \ el these
eferences an u sually
ue, and thus, albeit
. iihIh ate thai Scol
and boasted a few na-
ive painters durir
\1.II No. 166. -n
KIM. mil- :.
Middle Ages, these men and their pictun - are shrouded
in mystery. It is virtually impossible, in fact, to say
anything very definite about Scottish painting ant
to the union of the crown- : while the -indent of the
present theme is confronted by a further and perhaps
more potent difficulty — in short, the existence of end-
less copies of most Stuart portrait-. The copying of
such works is proceeding on a considerable scale even
at the present day, while in the Georgian era it was
earned on extensively, finding a good market among
Jacobite members of the nobility. 1'hroughout the
si venteenth century the practice was also common, and
the re-ult ol all this is that, ill several galleries, one
finds a wl lence
of una Utlli lltii
Stuart portraits. The
Earl of Galloway,
example, pi >ssi -
bi ginning with
R. iberl II ■>]n\ ending
with James \ . ; bul
ai.ii. work
in e very case 1 >f one
1. and are quite
of no mon mcieilt
than thi
torian pei ii id. Al 1 l< >1\ -
: Palace, likewise,
the banqueling-hal
tain- pi irtraits of all the
:seottisli kings till the
Ki st. iratii in : \ 1 t, inas-
much a- tile
dry lot are i
have been doi
lame- de \\ itn in 1 68 |.
the early pictures among
them an prima
The Connoisseur
imaginative. A n d at
Taymouth Castle, again,
the seat of the Marquis
of Breadalbane, thei e
an- several mediseval
Smart portrai t s ; but
i hese, as one learns from
Horace Walpole's - \nec-
doti s of Painting, were all
painted in or about 1635
by George Jamesone.
It is just possible, of
course, that this artist
utilised originals existing
111 his day but now lost :
and, though this idea
has slender support as
regards the Taymouth
pictures, a like assump-
tion is admissible in
relation to certain other
works. It were rash, no
doubt, to entertain it for
long in reference to a
curious article in the
Sinttish National Por-
trait Gallery — a family-
tree whereon are de-
picted the Stuarts from
their first traceable pro-
genitors to the Merry
Monarch : but while this,
in li kclihood, has no
valu e beyond that of
being a memento of
Restoration days, one is
constrained to apply the1
aforesaid hypothesis to
another item in the same
gallery. This item con-
sists in portraits of the
first five Jameses, all of
them probably from the
brush of the same artist.
They were acquired only
four years ago, the cura-
tor's attention being
called to them by Dr.
Hay Fleming, the his-
t o r i a n, w h o had dis-
covered them in the
house of a private indi-
vidual. Unfortunately
their history prior to this
JAMES I. or SCOTLAND FROM HIE ENGRAVING BY
W. C. EDWARDS, AFTER THE PAINTING
I\ THE POSSESSION OF THE EARL OF DARTMOUTH
KIM; JAMES II.
SCOTTISH NATIONAL I'OKIKAI] GALLERY
is not known, but the
style of their workman-
ship strongly suggest
the J a in ■■ s V. period,
while, moreover.the mere
fact that that king is the
last of those delineated
goes far to indicate that
they were done during
his reign, indeed pos-
sibly at his behest.
Whether James I. was
really author of The
Kingis Quhair is still a
disputed point,* but at
least he is one of the
most interesting of the
Stuarts, and one would
fain see something
approximating a vera-
cious likeness of him.
And it is, primarily, to
the above-named quintet
that one must look for
this, for his picture there-
in has marked affinity
with another alleged
portrait of him, also in
the Scottish National
Portrait Gallery, while
a further indication that
the former is in some
degree truthful will ap-
pear presently. James V.
decorated a room at
Stirling Castle with por-
trait-medallions carved
in wood, and they hung
there till the end of the
eighteenth century.
Presumably they repre-
sented historical person-
ages, and were arranged
in chronological order ;
but, as no attempt was
made to note or pre-
serve this when taking
* The question is examin-
ed in the present writer's
book, The Koyal Stuarts in
their Connection villi Art
and Letters (Edinburgh,
1908).
68
Earlv Stuart Portraits
them down, in the main
it is difficult to know
who, precisely, they wi re
supposed i" portray.
Sorrn "i them, howevi r,
are easily identi fied :
and one of them is dis-
tinctly akin i " the
fames I. portrait now
under discussion, while
both this and the can ing
are likewise similar to a
later picture of the king,
one contained in loiin
Johnston's Inscriptiones
Historica Regum Scoto
rum, a book issued in
Ido:.
But the foregoing,
although the most note-
wort hy of James's al-
leged likenesses, do not
exhaust the list. Several
earlv ed itions of the
poems ascribed to him
have a portrait -frontis-
piece, and, though vera-
city on the part of all
these is unsupported, a
moment's attention is
due to an engraving in
Fraser Tytler's Lives oj
flu- Scottish Worthies
(London, 1805). This is stated to be reprod
"from an original painting in possession of the Earl
oi Dartmouth," but the present Earl can give no in-
formation anent the picture or its whereabouts to-day,
Ai the same time, as the print shows a boy in his
teens, one is tempted to think lli.it it may be authentic.
James was twelve when his captivity in England
began, and he remained there till he was thirty.
Contemporary historians an- agreed in stating that he
was well educated, and well cared lor in ever) way,
so is it not credible thai his portrait was painted
during this time of exile? Any illumination of the
question would be intensel) welcome, and so too
would any light on the superb group by Pinturicchio
in which James figures. This is one of a series oi
mural paintings in the ( 'athedral Library, Siena, their
subjects throughout being mm idents in the life of Pope
I 'ins II. ; and, as he visited the Scottish court in 1 j.35,
in the group m question he is duly shown parli
with the king. These frescoes were not begun till
five years after James's death, and whether the painter
.1 NBAS s',| VI MINI BI
FROM THE TAIN I IN'.
was aided by an
portrait of the
conject ure : but
i Scotlam
est kings, pi vli. 1:1
• t. should
memorated in a work
which is a m
supreme triumpl
Italian art.
It is unlikely that
there is an) real pi irtrait
of James's queen, i
Beaufort, immortalised
alike in Tin l\
Qtihair and in a p
by Rossetti. A 51 an
se ven t een th-c e ntury
print purports to n
sent her, but its authen-
ticity is wholly iinbut-
to ssed,whilein
of James II. one is
confronted with 1
difficulties. At Schloss
Kielberg, near Tubin-
gen, there was at
time a portrait of him,
and though it has dis-
ared now, .1 repro-
duction is found in
George von Ehingen's Itinerarium, published in [666.
It differs considerably from the picture in the Scottish
National Portrait Gallery quintet, and thus neither
work serves to authenticate its fellow ; yet one cannot
but attach considerable value to the last-nai
face therein being typical of the H0US1 Ol Stuart;
while reverting to the Tubingen work, th
in its favour which is worth noting. I >ne of James's
Eleanoi Stuart, married the (hand r
Sigismund of Tyrol. Now, Tyrol is not far south
Tubingen, ami these tacts evoke the infeivn. <
the portrait at issue went abroad with El :ai
found its way northwards during the innume
wars in which Sigismund was implicated.
Passing on to later tunes, and Stud) in£
traits oi James III. and his queen, Mai
I 1, i,n ,.h k, om ' find oneself standing on sli
in met ground. In 1462 Mary of Gueldres, mothi
lames 1 | I., founded the ( Tun h of the I lolv Inn
Edinburgh, and an altai :
by Sir Edward Bonkill. Partsol this altar-piece have
1 ' M 1 [AMES I. 01 I. \M
BY PIN II KH I HI0
■in
JAMES III. OF SCOTLAND
ASCRIBED IO VAN DER GOES, 1474
AT HOI.YROOU [PHOTO (NG1 IS
MARGARET OF DENMARK, QUEEN OF SCOTLAND
ASCRIBED TO VAN DER GOES, I476 \ I HOLYROOD [PHOTO INCUS
71
7V/c Connoisseur
vanished, the vandals of
the Reformation being
mayhap responsible:
but two panels are still
rved at Holyrood,
and on these are por-
traits of James and
Margaret. The king is
shown in crown and
royal robes ; he is kneel-
ing in the act of devo-
tion, and behind him
are St. Andrew and
the heir to the throne,
while in the background
the Scottish 1 ion ram-
pant is prominent. The
queen is also figured at
pray er : her dress i s
trimmed with ermine,
while her identity is
further proven by the
existence on her prie
die it of the arms of
Scotland impaled with
those of the triple king-
dom of Scandinavia.
It is clear that both
t hese panels are by
the same hand, and equally clear that he was a
native of the Low Countries, yet his name has
never been ascertained. In the earliest traceable
document referring to the portraits — a catalogue
of works of art belonging to James VI. — they are
mentioned as " doune by Joan Vanek"; but if
this stands for Jan van Eyck, it is obviously a mis-
take, for he died in 1440. Hugo Van der (k>es
has also been frequently suggested, and Sir Claude
Phillips once gave it as his opinion that, though
ictual portraits are not by that artist, his hand
is discernible in the Holy Trinity painted on the
, ol the lames III. panel. It must be con-
.1 that there is no record of Van der Goes having
visited Scotland, but in the Middle Ages Scottish
churches often had their decorations made in Holland
or 1 landers, and the theory that this was done in the
present instance is additionally tenable, for a brother
of Bonkill is known to have been at Bruges about
the time the Holy Trinity church was founded.
Accordingly, bearing in mind the difference noted
bv Sir Claude, the most rational conclusion is that
of the altar-piece were done on the Continent
bv Van der Goes, but that the royal portraits were
afterwards painted by a Fleming resident in Scotland.
Whatever his name, and
whatever the nature 1 il
his other works, he-
achieved on this oc-
casion a beauty which
no changing fashion is
likely to deny : a beauty
which, waiving some
pictures by Van 1 >yck,
marks the highest
aitistic level attained
in the whole of Stuart
portraiture. And it is
right and fitting that
the dreamy face of
James III. should lie
perpetuated in so mas-
terly and exquisite a
style, for of all the
Stuarts few loved art
more passionately than
he, and f e w of the
dynasty suffered more
bitterly for the predi-
lection. Was it not
chiefly his refinement,
his devotion to sesthetics
in all their branches,
which made him so
unpopular with the rude nobility of his day in Scot-
land, and led finally to his tragic end at Sauchieburn ?
There are divers alleged portraits of James I\ .
One of them is among the treasures assembled by
Sir Walter Scott at Abbotsford, and one is naturally
inclined to regard any historical likeness there as
genuine : but the artist's name is unrecorded, while
nothing is known of the picture's history save that it
was presented to Sir Walter by his publisher, Archibald
Constable. Another is at Xewbattle Abbey, a home
of the Marquis of Lothian, and is ascribed to Hol-
bein : but either this ascription is wrong or James is
not the man represented, for Holbein did not come to
England till after Flodden. Vet another is in the
Bibliotheque at Arras, and this, according to tradition,
was copied from an original now lost. Nor is the
theory other than sane, for the picture has a good
deal in common with a portrait belonging to Captain
Stirling, of Keir, in Stirlingshire : and the latter,
though not acquired by its present owner's family till
last century, has huge claims to \ eracity, as a mon
explanation will show. Daniel Mytens copied numer-
ous old portraits for James VI.. and one of these. 111
a catalogue of Charles I.'s collection, is mentioned
as "King lames IV. of Scotland, with a faulcon on
or GUISE, QUEEN OF IAMES V. AM) MOTHER
MARY QUEEN of SCO! -
FROM \ DRAWING IN l'HE BRITISH MUSEUM
M
11
I*
if
r
^r
f
— -
■ ^
i -
ft
F
-r-
The Connoisseur
Ins list, done
aftei an an-
cieni watei
co our piece,
hall .1 figun •
rielif
while looking
further hack, in
a list of pic-
tures belonging
to HenryVIII.,
<piic finds the
entry, " facob-
be, Kynne ol
Scottes, with a
hawke on his
list.' The last
may be accept-
cil wit h o u t
much reservi
as the water-
colour cited in
tin- previous
quotation, and
both are easily
identified with
tin' K ei r por-
trait, for My-
tens' brush-
work i- recog-
nisable there-
in, the subject
lias a falcon on
his left wrist,
while in one
corner is a "J,"
ami in another
'•IV. Plainly
one has here,
then, not an
actual painting
from life, but a seventeenth-century copy of one, the
probability being that the missing original was pre-
sented to Henry VII. at the time Tames was married
to Margaret Tudor.
"Old Noll as he looked and lived" — so wrote
Carlyle of a picture of Cromwell; and so might one
sprak (if this James IV. It agrees with all that is
known of him, it is true biography in paint, and it
reincarnates the very soul of the man. Every trait
in his character is given — his wit, his cleverness, his
virility, his splendid if sometimes foolhardy bravery :
while his artistic tastes are not omitted, and as one
gazes one recalls that Tames was the friend of many
JAMES IV. ' '!■ SCOTLAND
FROM NIK P0RTRAI1 l\ llll POSSESSION "I i IPTAIN STIRLING
poets and mu-
i c i a n s , and
-■in plo
own skill as
lutenist tocourt
Mar-ant on
their first meet-
ing. "Incounty-
nent the kynge
begi mne befoi
hyr to |ila\ ol
the clarycor-
di s, and afterol
the lute, wicht-
plea s yd h > r
varey much,
and she had
grett plaisur ti
here hym," —
tints runs a pic-
turesque con-
temporary ac-
count of the
royal w ooing,
written by fohn
Voting, a her-
ald w h o a c -
companied the
p r ospect.n ■
Queen of Scot-
land on be r
journey thither.
Of Margaret
herself there
are also numer-
ous pictures,
a n d , w h i 1 e
none can he
traced back
to the queen's
o w n day, a
Mytens copy at Hampton Court constitutes a fail test
as to the amount of truth in older works supposed
to represent her. Among those which resemble
this in some degree are one at Arras and one at
Newbattle, while some similitude to the Mytens is
discernible in a drawing in the Lenoir collection tit
Chantilly, in one of the Stirling Castle medallions,
and again in a picture at Cardiff Castle. One marks
the requisite similarity likewise in a work of Mabuse
in the Scottish National Gallery, and as that artist
visited England in the reign of Henry VII., and gained
several royal commissions, there is really no cause
to be dubious about this picture. What is known
74
Ear/v Stuart Portraits
ol Margaret's character is expressed most fully and
lately thereby, while to speak of its purely artistic
qualities, its rich tone and fine lapidarian workmanship
place it in the front rank of early Stuart portrait:
1 oming finally to the parents of Mary Queen of
Scots -James V. and Mary of Guise — one is able to
speak in more definite fashion than hitherto. At
Hardwick, a seat of the Duke of Devonshire, there is
a twin portrait of these sovereigns, and though its
artist is unknown, it-- manner of technique proclaims
it of the James Y. period: the respective names of
the king and queen are stated beneath either, while at
the foot are the royal arms of Scotland impaled with
those of Lorraine. The picture is thus of almost
unassailable authenticity, and with this one as guide
it is easy to verity some others, salient among these
being two fine portraits of James, the one at Windsor
and the other in the Scottish National Portrait
Gallery. The Hardwick painting likewise proves a
medallion in the Stirling Castle set to represent the
king, and his character, as adumbrated in all the fore-
going, is exceptionally winning. Two of his con-
temporaries— Sir David Lindsay, who was his tutor.
and Bellenden. the historian — affirm that he was a
poet of a high order; and though none of his verse
>r\ ived, his hk- ■ ds to a mfirm I :
while one feel, too, looking at the slip
that it was small wonder L
hi ighout the « - irned
name of "the poor man's king."'
Mary also looks engaging in the Hardwick picture,
which shows her as a young woman in the early
twenties, while there is something distinctly attra
in her face as delineated by Janet. His drawii
her is now in the British Museum, and a brilliant
of work it is. a \ast quota of life and ol tl
d by few lines and little modelling. It
depicts her in middle-age, and so the Hardwick like-
ness scarcely forms a confirmation : yet all doubts as
to authenticity are dispelled by the inscription on
the drawing, "La Mere de la Revne d'Ecoss V
so may one speak of another picture, a three quai
length in the English Xational Portrait Gallery, for
the idea has been mooted that the subject here is no:
Mary of Guise, but her more illustrious daughter. 1'.
is a painting of the loftiest beauty, and one would like
to ascertain the identity of the sitter; but perhaps it
is advisable to let the matter rest, the very mention
of Mary Queen of Scots being liable, as the Highland
phrase goes, "to set the heather on lire.
vajik
» ■ '. • ^XN
3 >
Isy
1
w
MH Wi
SSPa
* <* ¥ > $
'< K&j
m
#*
^'
Iat onv.< ay intvs . scorn >kvm rkx >
t> vti
ANNO A.TAT IS *\T
f '. • in- • >■ ■ .
7 f
JAMBS V. VND ' CI 1SE, Mil; KAT1IER \M> MOTHER "I MAR> '." EBN Ol >0
A I IKK THE PICTURE IN THE COI.LEi HON 01 I II I 1>I KE OF DE\ ONSHIRE i'1'O HANKSTAEM1I
75
Pottery and
Porcelai
A Loan Collection of Ralph Wood Figures and Groups at the
Whitworth Institute Galleries, Manchester By FranK FalRner
A PECULIAR interest attaches to this import-
ant little exhibition of some fifty earthenware figures,
kindly placed on loan by a well-known collector, from
ili. fact that it happens to be the first occasion upon
which the work of Ralph Wood, of Staffordshire, has
been exclusively displayed in a public gallery, and
an opportunity is thereby afforded for the wider
appreciation of his originality in modelling and his
exquisite delicacy of coloured glaze decoration.
During the last few years certain collectors have
come to recognise that in the eighteenth century
England possessed a potter of whom it may be said
that the mantle of Palissy had descended upon him,
and this gathering together of a small representation
of his skilful craftsmanship serves to confirm their
judgment, and to bring about the conviction that
most of the figure-modellers of more recent date have
been largely inspired by the artistic example set by
Ralph Wood and his son.
Their later productions, shown separately, and
decorated with strong enamelled colours, clearly
demonstrate how, after the period of coloured glazes,
necessarily of limited and refined range, had passed
away, the revelling in an almost unlimited palette
quickly followed, when the decorator, no longer
hampered by the running of one glaze into another,
indulged in garish flesh-tints, and let himself go in
the adoption of the vividly coloured draperies ami
accessories so painfully characteristic of many ot the
nineteenth-century Staffordshire figures and groups.
Whether the China figures of Bristol, of Chelsea, or
the other contemporary fabriques could have been
decorated with the more beautiful coloured glazes
instead of the brighter enamels raises a question of
i
No. I. — RALPH WOOD'S MODEL OF THE NEAPOLITAN 1 l»\
76
«
i&
MARY Ol EEN OF SCOTS
BY JANET
From the picture in the possession of Earl Spencer, K.G., at Althorp
3 I
■
Collection of Ralph Wood Figures
historical technicality only to be answered by the
student of research in these well-trodden but not
wholly explored paths — quite possibly the fact that
valuable collections in the possession of private
owners are of considerable importance.
The subjects chosen by the Ralph Woods, assisted
N'o. II. -win ii: in
the productions of the Ralph Woods were in earthen-
ware and not china may be suffii nut reason for the
strange fact that tin process of glazing in colours in
early days would appear to have been mastered by a
single individual or family in England.
The period of production of the objects in the
collection ranges from about 1740 to tin- end ol thi
century, and those decorated with coloured glazes, 11
is reasonable to suppose, would be made during the
first thirty years or so. As at that time, with the one
exception of [osiah Wedgwood, the potters' output
would not be very large, it is natural that no greal
quantity ol these at one time neglected works ol
art should have survived. There an-, however, a
'air number in our public museums, and one or two
s| OF MILTON
at times by their friend John Voyez, ma) be thus
classified : —
( 'lassie ami allegorical statuettes.
Pastoral groups and figures.
Portrait busts and figun s.
Equestrian groups.
figure jllgs.
Animals.
Flower-holder ornaments and plaques.
And the fact must be conceded that the high standard
of modi lling ai hieved in many of their subjects was
naturally not attained in all their productions. It
should, however, be borne in mind that mm
their work was essentially original, and that in those
7''
The Connoisseur
days their lo-
i 1 1 1 v was
remote from
the foreign
in f 1 uences
prevailing in
the southern
parts uf Eng-
land, in Bris-
tol, and even
in I >erby.
With regard
to the im-
pressed marks
found upon
these objects
under review,
t h e n a m e
u . wood i n
d capital
letters has
been record-
ed upon some
four or five examples.
Burslem," in capitals
quite so rare. Thosi
I "earing the former
mark are either white
or decorated wi th
coloured glazes, and
those impressed with
the latter are white,
coloured glazed, or
enamelled. Another
distinctive feature of
marking is the series
i if mou Id numbers :
these appear upon
examples decorated
in both manners and
i m white figures, but
so far they are not
associated with the
mark R. wood. The
list of mould num-
. has now become
amplified since its
introduction in Tilt
WHO J Family uj
Burslem, published
in iqi2 by Messrs.
Cha pman & Hall,
wherein also is set
forth the pedigree
Nc
III.
1U1 I -KM I
whereas that of " Ra. Wood,
and lower-case letters, is not
N'O. IV.
NEPTUNE A\l> \ KM -
showing the
I a m i 1 v con-
in i tions be-
t « e e ii t h
W oods a ml
the Wedg-
woods in the
eig lit e enth
century.
Other pro-
minent cha-
racteristics i
the Ralph
Wood earlier
groups a i
their u n -
glazed bases
and occasion-
al u n g 1 a z e d
spaces, where
the coloured
glazes, having
been applied
with a brush, have here and there missed. These fea-
tures, however, are not applicable to all early examples.
No.i. shows K.i
WOod's model of the
Neapolitan lion ; he
also made a large i
model from the world-
famed lion in the Log-
gia dell Orgagna at
Florence. Both these
reproductions are ex-
cellent specimens of
the potter's craft.
N'o. ii. isfromanun-
common white bust
ofMilton, i 2^in.high,
and unmarked. Hi^
smaller bust, 9 in.
high, of which sevi ra
examples are known,
is marked "Ra.Wood,
Burslem," with the
mould number 82,
and is uncoloured.
No. hi., the Bull-
bait, a favourite sub-
jectof the eighteenth-
century potters, is a
spirited and typical
example, decorated
with coloured glazes
A P UK 01 \\ III I 1 -I \ M Kl I 1.-
SO
The Connoisseur
and unmarked. Thi lull
fleshness in the treat-
ment of the eye of the
hull is a characteristic
feature in the modelling
of many (if these figures.
No. iv., Neptune and
Venus, a pair of white
statuettes. These models
have been frequently
copied by later potters,
and the early examples
arefound mounted upon
differently shaped bases
and pedestals. They
are cleverly conceived
figures, and the face of
Neptune may be tr.i. ed
in its likeness to several
other of the Ralph Wood
models.
No. v., St. George and
the Dragon, though
an important equestrian
group, derives much
charm from the richly
coloured glaze scheme
of decoration rather than
from the modelling.
This has always been a
popular subject, and is
to be found in all three
schemes of decoration,
and the name "Ra.
Wood, liurslem," with
the mould number 23,
is occasionally to be ob-
served upon the early ex-
amples. This particular
one, decorated in col-
oured glazes, hears the
mouldnumber 2 5 clearly
impressed thereon.
No. vi.. the Widow of
Sarepta — one of a pair
ofgroups, the companion
being Elijah and the
Ravens. This is an
enamelled example,
therefore the camera
.shows it to considerable
disadvantage. The chief
interest in this group is
the fact that it hears the
VII. — POINTER DOC.
No.
VIII. rom i! ..
S2
impressed mark " Ra.
Wood, liurslem." These
two religious groups
have been most popular,
many subsequent potters
having made mou Ids
thereof differing in cer-
tain details. This, how-
ever, is the only one as
yet recorded bearing the
Ralph Wood mark.
No. vii., Pointer Dog.
This is one of a pair, the
companion being a Set-
ter : the base, designed
to represent a somewhat
flattened cushion with
tassels at the corners,
has been adopted for
several otherappropriate
subjects. The model-
ling of this old English
sporting dog is excellent :
there are two different
designs of the Setter.
No. viii. represents a
desirable specimen of a
Toby jug. decorated in
delicately coloured
glazes, and is of the well-
known model copied by
many later potters, and
as a rule painted with
p r o n o u n c e d ena m e 1
1 olours, varying as to de-
tails in the small acces-
sories. The Ralph Woods
were the progenitors of
this popular design, and
one example exists bear-
ing the mark of " Ra.
Wood, Burslem," with
its mould number 51.
Their figure jugs con-
sist of a large variety of
subjects, and the follow-
ing may be found in-
cluded in the cabinets
of Toby-jug collectors :
The Thin Man; The
Planter ; The Sailor;
Martha Gunn : The
Squire, and the Old
English Gentleman.
Balloon Caricatures
By Mrs. F. Nevill Jackson
There has never yet been an important
discovery in any branch of science that has not been
food for mirth. From the first moment that the
problem of aerial navigation became of serious im-
portance, the wits began to point out the humours of
the new science, and the cartoonists to make game
of the exponents and their work. A long list, headed
by Rowlandson, might be compiled in which many
illustrious names would show that the artists of tin'
day have successively recorded their humorous history
nl aerostation.
The collection of caricatures on the subject of
ballooning produces a very interesting portfolio, .mil
this is further enriched if the humorous .illusions in
contemporary journals are sought fir. One of the
earliest satires was published in the Almanack pom
.LOONS
i u:i. \ l i Kl. in- I III. MONTGOLFIERS - BUSHED IN LONDON, MARCH .(111. 1 7-S j
83
The ( onnoisseiir
Rin in 1787, accompanied by some verses. I In
print shows "an infallible means of raising balloons."
( >ne of the small Montgolfier globes, with no cai
attai lied, is being hoisted from the ground by means
of strong ropes. Men in the garb of pierrots and
harlequins arc pulling at the cords. Of the same
date is "an infallible means ol guiding balloons,"
where the balloon, from which a man is suspended, is
in mid-air, dragged along by two asses ridden postillion-
wise by another pierrot.
,\s 1 arly as September 15th. 1784, the news slit., is
were making fun of the famous balloonists: —
"Flighi in ax Air-Balloon.
" This day at noon it is suspected Mons. Lunardi
means to eclipse the sun. An English gentleman
uoes aloft in company with him in the character of
the Man in the Moon ! After this adventurous pair
have passed the atmospheric limits, it is imagined
they mean to have a boxing-bout with Castor and
Pollux, and to drive them from their situation among
the constellations, which they mean to assume!
'• They mean to take only a sack of flour and a few
bottles of rum with them by way of provisions. The
flour will be made into cakes as they pass through
the rain-clouds, which will be baked in the sun the
first fine day afterwards. They will, of course, catch
wild-fowl enough on their passage to supply their
table : and in regard to their store of rum, it is only
necessan to fasten a shower to the tail of the balloon,
and they will never be in want of grog.
"As all the town are mad after the sight, Mons.
Lunardi has fixed upon the artillery ground as the
-pot most contiguous to Bedlam.
'The gentlemen of the City Association are to be
under arms to preserve the balloon from violation,
and, as it is their department to see to the hanging
of criminals, it is but right they should inspect the
aerial suspensions of men of every description."
This hanging joke is made to serve on many
occasions. On May 25th, 17X5, appeared : —
"Mr. Lunardi and Mr. Blanchard's last aerial trips
were both alike unsuccessful and ill-omened. Both
incurred the risque of breaking their necks, but the
one pushed directly for Tyburn, while the other look
ottrsi towards the Woolwich hulks."
On April 25th, 1786, Lunardi is again the butt ol
a jest, this time in connection with the Old East
India < 1 unpany : —
" Lunardi's request to the Court of Directors for a
passport to the East Indies occasioned some delibera-
tion in Leadenhall Street. His suit was at length
rejected, as it was considered dangerous to teach
the Company's servants, who are already above their
masters, to ascend still higher. Lunardi travels to
the clouds for existence, and 1 >r. Graham buries
himself underground for the same purpose. Pitiable,
indeed, is the fate of those men who cannot gel a
livelihood on the face of the earth."
Apropos of Ilia 11 chard's ascension on October 19th,
1784, it is said, "Messrs. Blanchard & Sheldon both
declare that during their voyage they continued 111
high spirits. This, we think, nobody will doubt, from the
altitude to which they were raised in the atmosphere."
In 1S02 the aeronaut Barrett, who if chiefly famous
for his unsuccessful attempts at ballooning, was made
game of in many ot the newspapers: —
"Many persons are enquiring what was the shape
of Mr. Barrett's late aerostatical machine. About ten
years since it may be recollected .1 balloon was con-
structed at Chelsea in the shape of a whale, and
which, on being tried, showed no alacrity but that
ol sinking. The answer to the enquiries respecting
Mr. Barrett's balloon may therefore fairly be, 'that
it is very like a whale.'
"Some of the papers speak warmly in praise ol the
coolness of Mr. Barrett, the would-be aeronaut. It
would be singular, indeed, if a man could not retain
bis coolness who never mounted to a greater height
than that of the Piccadilly Pump."
On November 10th, 1S02, the following paragraph
appeared : —
"The flying experiment of Mr. Barrett and diving
attempt of Mr. Todd both having failed, it has
quaintly been said that the former could not get up
nor the latter get down. This is somewhat familiar
to the observation made on Sir William Chambers
and Sir Joshua Reynolds, when a part of the terrace
of Somerset House gave way —
•• ' Sir William's works all meet die ground.
<\\ Joshua's colours fly.' "
It not infrequently happened in the early days ol
ballooning that the public was duped by men who.
pretending to possess more knowledge than they had.
sold tickets for viewing the inflation and ascent and
then decamped.
Amongst the failures which ended disastrously was
that of the Abbe Miolan and Janinet, which ended in
a si 1 ne very like that which took place at Juvisy at
the aviation meeting in 1909. when the railway broke
down. An immense balloon had been construe ted,
and was to be inflated at the Luxembourg, where
a large crowd waited from early in the morning till
live o'clock in the afternoon in a blazing July sun.
When at sunset the huge machine was still inert on
the ground, the multitude left their -eats, for which
they had paid many francs, and threw themselves on
84
— >
^ 1 w- Jm
3
u-l
•s5
The C onnoisseur
I PI n [-MAITRE PIIYSICMKN
I. A COQUETTE PHISK IENNF
DRESS CARICATURES PUBLISHED IN PARIS DURING HIE MOXTGOLFIER PERIOD
the barricade, broke it, trampled and smashed the
gallery of the balloon, the instruments, and all the
machine, eventually setting fire to the envelope. In
the caricatures which appeared after this event, the
Abbe Miolan was represented with bands round his
neck, while Janinet was shown as a donkey. In
another the cat and the ass arrive in their balloon at
the Academy of Montmartre, and turkey-cocks and
geese receive them. Songs of derision and epigrams
console the defrauded populace, and the words
"l'Abbe Miolan" were found to form the anagram
" Ballon abimee."
In 1802 comes a political caricature from the Strand
publisher, Williamson. A dandy ascends with a
lady who might well represent a buxom Britannia.
■' Madam, I hope you sits very much as you like.
he is represented as saying. " New. Mr. Gallingring,
I sit- .1- easy as one of my dear Mr. Firken's cheeses
in the scale." The crowd below looks up, and each
has lii- say. " Slip your cable, my hearty, and make
sail for no man's land." "Jack, she'll never rise:
is heavy as two aldermen.'' Such are samples
of the wit which is written on the sheet, and supposed
to be issuing from the mouths of the onlookers in the
' iffected by the political caricaturists of the day.
Partaking of the character of a farce — though ending
fatally — was the balloon duel which, accordin_
the annual register of June 23rd, 1808, was fo
on May 8th of the same year. The principals were
M. de Granprie and M. le Pique. The cause of the
quarrel, the lovely Mademoiselle Trvert, a member of
the Opera Ballet.
" A challenge ensued. Being both men of ele\ a
minds, they agreed to fight in balloons, and in order
to give time for their preparation, it was determined
that the duel should take place on that day month.
The parties met at a field adjoining the Tuileries,
where their respective balloons were ready to receive
them. Each, attended by a second, ascended his car
loaded with blunderbusses, as pistols could not be
expected to be efficient. A great multitude attended
on hearing of the balloons, but little dreaming of the
purpose, the Parisians merely looking for the novelty
of a balloon race.
"At nine o'clock the cords were cut, and the balloons
ascended majestically amid the shouts of the specta-
tors. The balloons kept, as far as could be judged,
within about eighty yards of each other. When they
had mounted to the height of about 900 yards, M. le
Pique fired his piece ineffectually. Almost immediately
after the fire was returned by M. Granprie, and
penetrated his adversary's balloon, the consequence
86
Balloon Caricatures
of which was its rapid descent, and M. le Pique and
his friend were both dashed to pieces on a house-top
over which the balloon fell. The victorious Granprie
how imposing was the ascent, and how t< rrified
all the occupants of the car. ''They say we ■
our flags, and I'm sure it I had a flae in my ha
GENII S S I \K\ INC IN AN All IC
li BUSHED IN London, END OF EIGHTEENTH CE.NTI KV
then mounted aloft in the grandest style, and de-
scended safe with his second about seven leagues
from the -pot of the ascension."
In a letter "To the Editor of Figaro, London,
October 22nd, 1836," a humorous description is given
of an ascent with Mr. C.reen from Yauxhall Gardens,
commencing: "Ascending with Greens, it is little
wonder that we came down in a field of cabbages"
The writer describes at great length in a full column
must have shook. Xo sooner had Wi I 1 the
level of the lir>t floors in the ascent than «v shot
majestically up among the attics, and then almost
immediately found ourselves among the chimney-pots.
1 now began to feel I was above the world, and taking
out my large telescope, 1 minutely observed tin- a
-tails, and particularly remarked how -mall the penny
lots appeared. The most interesting thing I h
Mr. Green sav was, 'Now we'll descend,' and when
< a.
it par Mm I '■' '
BALLOON \n|. CRINOLINE CARICA1 R] PUBLISHED IN PARIS UiOU'l
87
The Connoisseur
we hud all tumbled out like so many ninepins rolled
down with a single hall, 1 felt quite brave and
comfortable."
We may fittingl) close the account of some oi the
:nn >>( the ballooning craze by quoting three out of
the twelve stanzas from the first number of BeiitUys
Miscellany, which is described in a contemporary
journal as "coming forth under the direction of the
ious Boz, and promises to be a very agreeable
member of the numerous race of monthlies " : —
"THE MONSTRE BALLOON.
" Oh, the balloon, the great balloon '.
I: left Vauxhall one Monday at noon,
And every one said we should hear of it soon,
With news from Aleppo or Scanderoon.
ty soon after folks changed their tune :
The netting had burst — the silk — the shalloon :
I: had met with a trade wind — a deuced monsoon —
It was blown out to sea — it was blown to the moon —
They ought to have put off their journey till June :
none but a donkey, a goose, or baboon,
Would go up, in November, in any balloon !
■Then they talked about Green— oh. where's Mister I
And where's Mister Holland who hired the machine?
And where is Monk Mason, the man that has been
Up so often before— twelve times or thirteen —
Ami who writes such nice letters describing the scene ?
And where's the cold fowl and the ham, and poteen ?
The press'd beef, with the fat off— nothing but lean?
And the portable soup in the patent tureen ?
Have they g"t to grand Cairo? or reach'd Aberdeen?
Or Jerusalem — Hamburgh— or Ballyporeen ?
No ! they have not been seen ! Oh, they hav< :
' But here's Mister Hughes '. What says young Mr. Hughes
Why, I'm sorry to say we've not got any news
Since the letter they threw down in one of their shoe-.
Which gave the Mayor's nose such a deuce of a bruise,
As he popp'd up his eye-glass to look at their
Over Dover ; and which the folks flock to peruse
At Soulier's bazaar, the same evening, in crewes.
Politicians, newsmongers, town council, and blues.
Turks, heretics, infidels, lumbers, and Jews,
Scoring Bachelor's papers, and Warren's reviews :
But the wind was then blowing towards Helvoetsluys,
And my father and I are in terrible stews.
lar^e a balloon is a sad thing to lose."
SKIT ON Till AND HORSELESS CARRIAGE CRAZE
ABOUT 1820
88
PORTRAIT OF DAVID GARRICK
BY JOHN ZOFFANY, R.A.
In the collection of Earl Spencer. K.G., at Althorp
Peasant Jewellery of Holland
Si ■ different arc many of the aspects of English
and Dutch life that it seems difficult to believe that
the two 'peoples are not only closely akin in race,
but arc merely divided by a hand-breadth ol sea. An
old-world atmosphere still lingers
in many of ihe rural districts
i il 1 [olland, which is not to be
rivalled even in the more re-
part of the British Islands.
It is not so much that the
buildings are more ancient as
that everything is consistent
with them: and so, instead of
merel) coining across -ome
le visitor
appears stepping into it. The costume ol the people
p this illusion. Go where one will in
the British [sles, it is impossible to gel away from
thi orthodox twentieth-century garb, which, with some
slight modifications, prevails in all large modern
cities. The old English smock-frock, the tall hat
and pictui costume once generally worn by
noon FOR WOMJ
sn via;
By Edwin R. Baird
An essential portion of this costume — especially in
gala times — is the jewellery. Probably it is the oldest
part ol it. tor among primitive races the desir
personal adornment generally precedes the desire for
raiment. Thus the makii
jewellery is the most ancient of
artistic crafts, and peasant jewel-
lery may 1m- regarded as its
oldest existing form in common
use. with the exception, of
course, of til'
which are frank reproductions
of the antique. The greal
of some of the designs of the
peasant jewellery is shown by
their forms occurring among widely separat
pointing to a common and remote origin. This p
of the subject is, however, too lar-i
onsidered in the present article, which
is merely a short description ol the ;
and inexpensive puces in common use in li
They exhibit the beauties and failings commn
\, OF ."il 01
I ' I Ml
[RONS
: . the dress ol the I [ighlander,
have practically disappeared from ordinar) life; but
in Holland the peasantry still wear much the same
clothes as they did ( enturies ago. and the gain :
picturesque appi irana ol the country is imm
a jewelli i ■■'■ Foreign influ
have scarcelj affei ted the designs, w t :
i li.ua. teristic of the people and rai j ol tin
those of more the styles ol v
1 ENDING p \R J s OF I HE M'IRAI S
HEAD-WEAR OF PLAIN GOLDEN PLATES
FLAT r.OI DEN PLATE ATTACHED TO HEAD-BOW OR HOOD
9?
in I I ILLUSTRATIONS SIIOWINC HOW Mil ORNAMENTS VRE WORN
93
The Connoisseur
ilso more picturesque,
for their makers, debarred
by the comparative poverty
of their clients from mak-
ing a lavish display of
1 i istl] gems and heavy gold
mountings, are compelled
to trust to beauty of work-
manship and design for the
effect of their jewels. The
failing of peasant jewellery
is that it is apt to become
sti reotyped. The makers
continue to reproduce old
patterns which have been
handed down from time
immemorial, and rarely
introduce novelties. They
are not wholly to blame
for this, as the peasantry
much prefer the traditional
1 1. 1 Herns.
An interesting feature of
Dutch work is that nearly
every district f o 1 1 o w s
its own traditions, so that
designs which are in vogue in one village may be
quite distinct from those in its immediate neigh-
1. This is well shown in the head-gear
which forms such a beautiful and striking feature in
a I iu tcli an man's cos-
tume. An illustration is
given of a typical hood,
made of gold or silver
plate, w urn round the
li e.id in North H o 1-
land. The square orna-
ments in front cover the
temples of the wearer.
This example shows the transition from the broad
Frisian hood to the still narrower bow. A lace
bonnet of different shape to that worn in Friesland
covers the bow. The narrow head-bow or so-called
lluu THE ORNAMENTS ARE WORN
UlAMiiMi BONNE!
ear-irons worn in Zeel
and around the Zuidei
arc a still further develop-
ment in the direction of
narrowness, from the broad
hood covering the h
entirely, which was once
lerally worn. In this
form it merely becomes a
wire on which to hang
the decorations which
adorn the ends. Th
are of various descriptions,
among the more usual
being gold or silver spiral-,
the number of windings
of which indicates the
wealth or poverty of the
wearer. The pending parts
of the spirals, sometime-
set with pearls like ear-
rings, and at others wholly
composed of worked metal,
are frequently of a most
elaborate character. An-
other and almost uni
form of ornament worn with the head-bow are the
flat golden plates, which are engraved with a quaint
pattern, in which the absence of straight or parallel
lines may be noted. Such forms of embellishment
would be against tradi-
tional custom, and would
consequently be rejected.
The gold plates
often worn by theii
owners during their daily
occupations, as is shown
in the illustration of the
girl cleaning a milk-churn.
The more elaborate gauds are not so degraded. How
ornate these are may be seen from the four illustra-
tions showing Dutch girls wearing their complete g i
head-gears. These are all taken from Zeeland r
t
?
HOOD \M> I10NNET PINS
<14
Peasant Jewellery of Holland
It in. iv be noted that the forms of the bonnets and
of the metal ornaments exhibit wide variations, which
might he indefinitely multiplied, for every little town
rich Frisian woman, with its metal-work and jewels,
may cost as much as 3,000 or 4,000 guilders, an
equivalent to about ,{.-50 nr ,^..300. It must no
CORAl CHAIN WITH LOCK AND CENTRE-PIECE 01 GOLD
has its distinctive type of adornment. Thus in one
neighbourhood spirals and penders are worn, and the
lock of the neck-chain fastens under the chin. In
another the lock of the neck-chain fastens at the
back, and different ornaments are substituted. The
traditional patterns belonging to each village are
strictly adhered to, so that in the course of a few
thought, however, that diamonds are the only sti
set in bonnet - pins, as the latter are of endless
variety, and nearly every kind of stone is used ii
their adornment. In mourning dark stones are used,
as is instanced in the third example in the
illustrated.
Less intimately connected with the bonnets are tin:
l .1 II M-,\ I I ICK l 'I
I'LATl \M>
I'HREADWOI
EAR I
one may come across endless varieties of jewi I
lery all retaining the same main characteristics "I
material and workmanship, hut widely different in
their detail.
Before leaving the subject ol bonnets, one must
draw attention to the bonnet-pins, which, though worn
nominally with tin- idea ol securing the hi ad ;e ir, an
often .on',, M'd into costly objects ol adornment.
The) are frequently ornaments with diamonds ol not
too modest a character. Thus the lace bonnel ol
EARRING
earrings, n n ;old or silver, and not unl
i with gems. These are often charming exai
of dainty and elaborate craftsmanship. Other articles
on which the jew. Her lavishes his skill
and centre-pieces to the coral nei k irn in
distrii ts ol I [olland and Zeeland. Thi
terning ol these is endless in its variety, and
: ire of grea
■ Irs which come specifically under the i
jewellery, there are inarr
OUS LOCKS FOR CORA) NECK-CHAINS
SILVER WATCH-CHAIN WITH KEYS AND PENDERS
96
CIGAR-i \-i:, CORA! PURSE, \Mi \1\\- PURSE
BUCK1.1 l i
'."-'■'*
EXAC1 SIZE
"7
The Connoisseur
■&vm
nature which are wrought with equal ornateness and
elaboration of workmanship. One of these is shown
EARRINGS
in the silver case for knitting-needles, an article which
might with advantage occupy the attention of English
in a similar style, though not so elaborately, is intended
for the use of the sterner sex; as also, of course, is the
cigar-case.
Other masculine adornments which vie in interest
with the jewels of their feminine compatriots are the
1 [NKKI> BUTTONS
trouser buckles, and the well-known Zeeland button,
which is worn all over Holland, and also in other
countries, as a fancy article. It was originally designed
to fix the men's neck-cloths to their shirts. These
buttons are wrought in endless variety. A very quaint
SILVER CASE FOR KNITTING-NEEDLES
metal-workers, as one would think that there ought
to be a great demand for it.
The purses and cigar-case illustrated are also utili-
tarian in their purpose. The top purse — coral, with a
silver spring — isa lady's, but the leather one, mounted
item is the silver watch - chain, of a type worn by
peasants in various districts. Attached to it are a
couple of watch-keys and a couple of penders, the
flat ends of the latter affording room for the engraving
of the name and the initials of the owner.
M I I \1. 1:1 CKI E
[Photographs Underwood and Underwood]
9S
-
S.
a: z
5 I
The Editor invites the assistance of readers of THE CONNOISSEUR who may be able to impart the information required by Correspondents.
Unidentified Miniature (No. 181).
1 (ear Sir, — I should be glad to hear whether any
of your readers can
identify the subject of
the miniature, photo of
which I send to you.
It is signed with initials
( ;. E., and experts have
pronounced it to be the
work of George Engel-
heart, period about 1780.
The modelling of the
head is superb, and quite
in the artist's most
characteristic vein.
\ ours faithfully,
" Ptolemy."
Unidentified 1'or-
1 rait (No. 182 i.
1 (ear Sir, — I have in
my pi issession (at Nor-
wich) an old oil-painting,
which I have enclosed a
snapshot of — not a verv
one of it either.
>u think there is any
who or what it is ? It is in a gi n id state of preservation,
except a small hole in the canvas.
visible on the enclosed. I might
say that tin- eyes and lips are
beautifully done, and the bloom
of youth is — to me — quite
natural ; the hair is dark. The
style <>l coat and neckwear is
plainly visible on the canvas.
\ ours truly, " Enqi irer."
Unidentified Silhoi i
(Al '.1 ST, ujra).
hi \i- Sir, — In consequence
of the request in The ( ONNi
seur ot August, 19T4 (Notes,
page 259), I have the honour to
inform you that I inherited from
an old lady-friend silhouettes of
(1S1)
probability of finding out letter, sent in answer to
the same period, in the same style, and just the same
subjects, so more than probably cut out by the verv
same artist. I found
them in a "k in
which she hersell had
written down in I hitch :
"Em losi d 1 uttings
were made in 1844 by
Wilhelm Mulli
I )usseldi irf.with a pair ot
quite ordinal
just while he xvas talk-
ing." In the His '
Silhouettes, by E. Nevill
Jackson, M u 1 1 er is. at
page 105, announi
Muller Wilhelm(i)
Yours sincerely,
I. I ■'. M. Si ERCK
1 1,1,11 len
HaM'U R] 1 II \ I'nK-
1 raits (April, 1915 |.
The editor of The
Freemason has lor-
« a rded the following
rex iew of the above note
CMIiKN I I F I K I > MINI X I ORE
which appeared in our issue for April: —
" To the Editoroj ' The Freemason.'
" The article on ' Handwritten
Portraits in your issue 1 if 1 ;th
April, 1 11 1 5, is ful 1 of inl-
Thirty years ago I had a 1
1 il the portrait of the 1 >uki
Sussex in caligraph) to which
reference is made, and it noxx
hangs on the walls of the ante-
Mi to the Leii
masons I [all. ["here is also in
thi 1 er Masonii Ha
Library a prit the
duk' phical sketi h, which
. key to the portrait : it xvas
written by the engraver, I.. 1 '.luck
Rosi inted at Brigh-
ton in 184(1. — I. T. T."
unidentified poi
101
The fine specimen of an Etruscan vase which we
reproduce belongs to the Marquess of Northampton,
having been brought from Italy by
Spencer, the second Marquess (1700-
htruscan Vase ' ....
1851). The subject with which the
vase is decorated represents a foot-race, the winner
being just about to pass the post. About the sixth
century B.C. numbers of
dreek vases appear to
have been imported into
Etruria, some of which
were imitated by the
Etruscans, but others were
more probably made by
Greek settlers. The
native productions were
generally marked by a
quaint archaic touch
which is quite lacking in
Greek pottery of the best
period^. The shapes, too,
are frequently clumsy,
although the piece under
mention can scarcely be
included in this category.
Lowestoft Teapot
I AM sending you a
photo ol a typical soft-
paste Lowestoft teapot
(Redgreave pattern, red,
blue, and gold decora-
tion) which was lately
given me by my mother,
Mrs. George Ives, the
Manor House, Wickmere,
Norfolk. My mother, who
has been a collector all
her life, is now nearly
A FINK ETRUSCAN \ \M
ninety years of age. She received it from her uncle.
Major Marsh, who fought under the Duke of Welling-
ton in the Peninsula. He received it from the Ke\.
Mr. Marsh, rector of many livings in Norfolk. From
his old pocket-books it was interesting to learn that he-
paid Mr. Nelson — Lord Nelson's father — ^52 per
annum for preaching for him. The Rev. Mr. Marsh
also had a Lowestoft tea
sen ice made for himself
with his monogram on it.
A few pieces are still in
existence. — Phil. Ive -
(Toronto, Canada).
Old English Cut-GIass
Our decorative arts
made a great advance on
the accession of William
and Mary, who brought
with them some famous
refugee French artists —
glass-making among the
rest. It did not, however,
reach its zenith till well
on in the second half of
the eighteenth century.
Hitherto the art side of
glass manufacture had
been practically confined
to drinking vessels. A
new ingredient (lead) be-
ing added to its magma,
wonderfully improved
both us colour and re-
fraction, surpassing in
these qualities the glass
of Bohemia and Venice,
and enabling far more am-
bitious articles — dishes,
Notes
bowls, covered jars, lustres, and candelabra — to be
sui cessfully produced. The enhanced refraction was
taken the fullest advantage of by our manufacturers,
then becoming enterpris-
ing, who devised a form
of decoration which dis-
played this quality of the
new -lass t o perfection.
A process of casting the
glass in mou 1 ds was in-
vented, instead of blowing
it as hitherto, which per-
mitted classic forms ol
bowls, vases, etc., to be
produced with precision
and solidity. On these
intersecting lines were
deeply cut diagonally, anil
the surfaces worked up
into series of pointed
prisms, since known as
••diamond cut," each refracting light like groups of
well-ordered crystals. This decoration yielded the
maximum richness of effect, and for a time almost
superseded every other. The larger bowls and covered
LOWEST! >l I I E U'< 'I
Mi- of classical outline were mounted on square-cut
plinths. To produce them the manufacturers of the
day had to introduce machinery and power to drive
the wheels which cut far
^ b more deeply into the gl
than before but the de-
mand amply compen-
sated for this. Old spi
mens are much sous I
alter, especially as the
peculiar quality and tone
of the genuine article can-
not even now be exactly
reproduced.
The superb pair illus-
trated are of very unusual
si/e, 17 J i nches h igh.
They are in the well-
known collection of the
1 lowager Duchess of Wel-
lington, and are probably
unique. Perhaps more dainty in design are the glass
candelabra or lustres from the same collection, prob-
ably based more 01 less on the earlier French 11
Italian rock-crystal originals. An apparently facsimile
1 .. .[ 1 CARVED IARS OF C1J N.IN'F
103
The Connoisseur
pair to one of these is shown in a recently published
book on an Isaac Ware chimney-piece, date about
1750, a date possibly assigned to the lustres. A
second pair, in which the branches spring from richly
C ut f 1 a s k-
shaped vases,
are of uncom-
mon design. It
is to be re-
gretted that no
museum pos-
sesses a collec-
tion of the fine
English cut-
glass of the
second half of
the eighteenth
cent u iv. —
J. Star k i e
( Gardner.
An Ivory
Powder-Flask
The two pic-
tures given of cut-glass
the original in my collection are taken from an ex-
quisite specimen of a sixteenth-century primer, or
powder-flask, an article very essential to the equipment
oi a sportsman or soldier of the period; its use was
lur the charging the flash-pan and touch-hole of the
gun or musket in the days of the flint and wheel-locks.
This ivory flask is elaborately carved on back and
front, while the
edge has carv-
ings in bold
reliefrepresent-
ing dogs and
animals of the
chase. It has
lost the two
small r i 1 1 g s
from the sides
through which
would pass the
cord form i ng
the sling worn
o v e r the
shoulder of the
sportsman ; it
is otherwise
quite perfect, even to the stopple. On the obverse
is a portrait, in profile, of Franciscus II., with the
name on a scroll above. The arms of France on a
shield occupy the reverse of the flask. An additional
CANDELABRA
CUT-GLASS CANDELABRA
interest attaches to the article from tin- fact that Francis,
as Dauphin of France in 1558, became the first hus-
band of our Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots. From the
beauty of the carving and the portrait, it is more than
probable that
the primer was
once tin.' pro-
perty of Francis
himself. W.B.
Redfern.
"The Battle
of the
Nations "
I T will at
once incur to
the reader that
thi s, m 11 tat 1 s
mutandis, is the
kind 11I Xnvs
Bill .or Extra
w h i c h w e
should like to
find posted all
over Lull dun
in the year of grace 1915. At any rate, we could
scarcely hope for anything more decisive.
The Leipzig campaign (Oct. 16th to iSth, 1813),
perhaps the most sanguinary in the Napoleonic wars,
marks the end of the " First Empire,'' to which the
" Hundred Days,'' terminated by Waterloo, forms a
supplementary and, as it were, accidental episode. A
feature of pre-
sent interest is
the defection of
the Prussian
contingent
(f r o m the
"Grand Army"
of 1812), the
begin n ing of
that organisa-
tion of Russo-
Prussian mili-
tarism which
so largely in-
fluenced the re-
sult. Even after
Leipzig there-
was a pause in
the operations (partly in fear of pushing Napoleon to
extremes) when Blucher and the "young German"
party spurred on the Allies to the action which ended
in the successful advance on Paris (.March 31st, 1814).
1 04
Notes
, POWDER-FLASK
• >!;'. ERSE \M> REVERSE
Two Famous
Mansions
Of all the memories which haunt Hardwick Hall,
that of Elizabeth, Countess of Shrewsbury, may well
be the most poignant. Before her
marriage with Sir William Cavendish,
this lady had been Mrs. Barley, net
Hardwick, daughter of John Hardwick, whose family
lived in an older edifice close beside the present
building. On her espousals, however, the estate was
granted as a portion of her dower, and eventually
passed to her second son. Sir William Cavendish, K. 1!..
who was created Earl of Devonshire in 1618. The
Countess, who possessed an extraordinary taste foi
building, and has left her sign-manual on many por-
tions of Hardwick in the form of her initials E. S.
surmounted by a coronet, w.is tin- subject ofa curious
tradition which has been preserved by Walpole.
According to him. this lady was warned by .1 sooth-
sayer that "her death should not happen while she
continued building ; and accordingly she employed
a great deal of wealth in that way, yet died in a hard
frost, when the workmen could not labor.
Not the least item of historical interest attaching to
Hardwick lies in tin- fai 1 tli.a Mary Queen ol Scots
spent some of her captivity in its spacious halls. The
si/.e and altitude of the interior do not come as so
much of a surprise after one has reflected on the
glories of Chatsworth and Oldcotes, both of whii b
due to the same " Bess of Hardwick." Walpole. with
the aspirations ..t" Strawberry Hill Gothic clinging
about him, scarcely bit the mark in bis Anecdoi
Painting when be -aid: "Space ami vastness sei
to have made their whole ideas of grandeur. The
palaces of the memorable Countess of Shrewsbury are
exactly in this style. The apartments are lofty and
enormous, and they knew not how to furnish them.
Pictures, bad they had good ones, would have been
lost in chambers of such height ; tapestry, their chief
moveable, was not commonly perfect enough to be
real magnificence. Fretted ceilings, graceful mould-
ing- of windows, and painted glass, the ornamei
the prei eding age, were fallen into disuse. Immense
li-hts 1 omposed ol bad glass, in diamond pane-.
an air of poverty over their most costly apartments.
That .it Hardwick. still preserved .1- it w.i- furnished
tor the reception and imprisonment of the Qui
Scots, i- a curious picture of that age and style.
Nothing can exceed the '1 <>i state,
in the hangings m the same chamber, and of the
>5
The Connoisseur
~
f
Atirt a faanl a
. ,000 llirn.
it^'iliuaij .l^lbll, wfaich Lffllirrir.1 (of
M(()\U BATTLE!
coverings for the ta-
bles. The first is cloth
of gold, cloth of silver,
velvets of different
colors, lace fringes,
and embroidery. The
hangings consist of
figures, large as life,
representing the vir-
tues and vices, em-
broidered on grounds
of white and black
velvet. The cloths
cast over the tables
are embroidered, and
embossed with gold
on velvet and dam-
asks. The only mi ive-
ables of any taste are
the cabinets and
tables themselves,
carved in oak. The
chimneys are wide
enough for a hall or
kitchen, and over the
arras are frieze of
many feet deep, with
miserable relievos in
stucco representing
hunting. Here, and
in all the great man-
sions of that age, is a
gallery remarkable
only fur its extent."
So thought Walpole ;
but then his mind was
t< k i full i if the architec-
tural futilities of his
own age to appreciate
the more virile qualities of the Elizabethan style. The
gallery to which he refers is 195 feet in length.
Eridge Castle, Sussex, the contents of which have-
already been dealt with in The Connoisseur, stands
on the site of an ancient manor, which was brought
into the family of the present owner by the marriage
of Sir Edward Nevill (d. 1476) with the Lady Eliza-
beth Beauchamp. only child of Richard, Earl of
Worcester and Lord Bergavenny. In 1573 Queen
Elizabeth staved for six days at the house, and
during that period gave an audience to the French
ambassador. Whilst visiting Eridge in 1606, Dudley,
Lord North, accidentally discovered the properties of
the now famous waters of Tunbridge Wells. Ulti-
mately the condition of the old mansion became so
TIJIKNDV. ' :i.lll\ MM. O'CLOCK
■lionupar/e defeated in Person ! <>(> Generals Killed
or Prisoners ! The King of Sa.com) and all his
Court taken Prisoners ! LEIPSIC taken by Storm !
The Total Loss of the Ptkiich Anri>,,*'&ZMQQ Men
and 1 80 Pieces of Cannon !
- .--. -.--v.,^-,o-Anu*e*^*"-' ■-■— -•■
K t)ISpATCUK$ ■ 1 .■'!„' ico-ii'i-d by \' ;'i ,„.,,
1 I u ■■■-, Uctufx-r 19, L-:vint'iU-Jc(u.l- ot j jinpln wit :*-v-.
■ ■ ■•■ I):- ■ C onibiitcd \iMir- i.fSwhrrhi .. - :, , . • ■•„■ \onU ui' Germany, n,.-r [!
ufaoad otLa\me, m< the i-iii ,
'■ (Ice huniirn) yii.--. iJcainwft, uxli ffuxuawl UI.-.I. wounded. Mil Wfaown ticwfi :
b i: . -rtm -ifn.l H"n(i.:iiil».-fi,' u.tnp,, cua*i*tinr of 'cavalry, artUfeiy and
nt'aic Itrgaia, Vula/y, ni- Beitrindj and Labrbloo, m«i
' IIOLj 1I.1v.
rniifi nfihe I'Jib, (*ip«le was taken by storm, trill) InttKinjrofSriuny, m/A
'. nfld KHr-gllnn] of ill" trail li ,f:u. airJ 30,000 ivOMfufa I ; — U .
.. I ..,:!■■,. psXc«{ uinc o'clock; Iht- Alh.^ mrqjngatW.-vci, , 1L1: Frt-eh Vi
. irtrie toi-r ijie in ii(! Jin: :, ,lt,.
" IM ifltih bo n >'i Ibc Uaralcltn left id, n, \gtilh,mlni -I of Lapac, 35,0Cr\n\',- ne--. h n] been
liul lilt OflJci.il UutjpHiol Ik-rhnoi <to ShA tAt .-.. ISO pitc sof cannon lobave I)
1
■
Mm louiltl and &niliiH
•■0,i!, IGtft, (vivT.l tj'v^v.Th.uIiitt.icLnl far 4 1I1, (iib.aad 7ih corps ..f [h,' Ftaidt '
■■ i;m1 a mil ;■ ,.l boifcricy-ttlcik forty pKc - ui citrtnon— out me
iv- ! a I i.u.;TWci.i,i i..iei?j;,d»oUIt«VrV
1 have been mhjrcd uu Ufa .'illli
TI:e K ■• ' nwry— t Otttm m .1 1 li ir»; Iw3ed bv ■'.
FIRM li\TTLK. AMI DKH * f OF (HI. I
KkNC'Ii f!
1 _!!!- V'.
TSKlwHlc, btSffolfewuida/lstlttfti i, lr»sH|u9[U 1V.I! canlfttrf ..■..' I.U.-K DuKl
BiMipori .. .1: Riug tltroagh *p omtrjof lbs ir :-k- or *, Iu;-i:/..mi.. . ,■
Jjgnpih.' whole o( Uu cavalry, uuder Mural. tli-AIL^ ih~n biqij^fat*utithi:ii r»=rvo
Qj:n^c bock upon th.« |].-ii«Mrcaccapicil IkIur.- 'j picrci] i;,.- I'm,, t>l vAwi
V rewstanfe lookill.y i.irm, with 3QIJ0U pti ■,
^•■'">, &-.-I &■<■. Tlau, in tlxir.lai., B<;i. i|.irti-
riuoM loaltloirLc ..uttaiiu-iHti Mn' s^-»l- s[»ci<M limal^-Btr-
I
'J'ttetltl -M, nndbirttiari.ii-. r. i« nn'.'.t 1.1 ,.J,t „( ae!l-olb ..
1 U 11 i,-.-. On tli- l"th, (lu_ni.ej.irel 1... th-«n.r 1 ,
"ii rUfflD RVTll-E. AND DEFEAT BVITLPW KO.\\P\RTE
:■ \::^, inv..>*,;.\l-,<.u,>\,{„u:-<dtiUJ r|(c. • Coiru Prinfee
. h,."i ftuclief, BMt the rrn^'otM.^rtrt/.-H!*^, a^licbcd feonapn;T-; hi .'1 hi* i^1:f- He foaib*
ibtcrniiimlMA, II^llfspenlitHi, that a mauin.ij* beWrrrwa^d j,. !,,«•, .Ui.jT* iliat lm Crowa
leiKttl* un<.ii lb-.- t=-ut jI lii. ■ ■ ' I' I - ubMii,a._/, (iKlati ■>-. Lis :.i!i,"HLr ■ uuavjifio*.
It.- \*j» tJrt"val»\l withlhc lro<rf.ibqut 4p,00(^mcir, iu I nearly SO lri(«« ufouunw.
Wiih^H giving tli^tueiuy a rt.n'. rw(Hlc, ifcJjJJka advaua;d (0 Lctpnc the day alfcf IS:-
,, uid jlti-r a aunt b!t«^ty *-:
1 n r ot cannon, am munition wajjgi
reduced oue-balf| n miirr rapid »'iJ uj0
*n ImcaUniiloui i-arniijJiru vn I{ii;iia.4.-
Lou on lb.- Ifilb, by -■«¥
ISffi, byttON'.ffiiftTJSiii nWn .......
Ombel'Jtb, imbcMorm.iiH-o'fL ii»ic
.
fforfl I.ti|'.;c. [t-ciapanc jilrtnplrtl to re!j. j1. I
1 . : : »*, Irodj oiU|,a-Jbv Ufa ctnqiKTOo ' !(.■ .- 11
witb iht: «vrtck and .-eiif 1.111 1 <A hii Army, took (ru- road *oBariJ-. t
60m hit ie«>urc» and \xi\ reinpKCCwicnU. Tbo Allin war in purafi □: liiin n.n! :.'•-■:
*tn,,l, t>. L'*j».n^lwfft-,J»di»6ars Mid defeat. May V- uim rr*Ut 0po.1h.mV ma -, „ ,1 '
■ St;'-i\ Ui I ina> v* I'i^hi'-'ec it uere. '
<>t " ' ' an either ?ide we haw no detail*! keftnnt. Mactfcrcitd, Soubara, and
yonbl^n-.k! c t 3 Mb prisoners. Kcymer, La.n.sn.n, .Jift(rjjid. Vatar\-, and Bmraa killed. The
^Kiog of Sa*(iity i.s." been nstucd&om tue-TynutH >■ -' .c, a-itb all L a Coflrt,
^11 the StcdMu ,Md Bftv4ri.-ui9, ami Wmd-iubu:,- Uaops camtfoib I Bo apaihVnar«
rov.lv cicwed, liea^dlhcaidpaictwglionrscjllvb.'ibrclbe Ulics.cnrccT! tl
The Pa^iwa'tV.^, i--,. n^n :. , Ringing, nnd 1.1. 1
/-
ANNOUNCING THE
THE BATTLE
dilapidated that it was
demolished, and the
present "castle " built
on its site during the
latter part of the eigh-
teenth century. A
portion of the old
structure, however,
was included in the
new edifice. The
"castle" itself is
rather a nondescript
erection, but typical
of the returning taste
for the Gothic styles
— a revival which was
as yet undeveloped,
and in a state of archi-
tectural infancy. —
Latham Burton.
Our Plates
The A/pin? Travel-
ler, mezzotinted by
James Ward from the
picture by James
Northcote, R.A., is a
somewhat rare print
which is not often
found in colour. It
was published by
John Jeffryes in 1S04
from a picture paint-
ed by Northcote in
1801, and exhibited
at the Royal Academy
in the following year
under the title of
Portrait of a Lady
Passing the Alps. The lady was Miss St. Clair, an
actress. Feeding Chickens, by P. W. Tomkins, after
J. Russell, is a delicate example of the "polite"
rural subjects which were thought so highly of by
contemporary connoisseurs. That their selection has
not been over-ridden by modem choice is an eloquent
compliment to the charm of the eighteenth-century
engravers, through the medium of whose work so
many fine pictures of the English school have been
preserved to posterity.
With the exception of Wildman's/'<"//v;//<)/y. M. II'.
Turner, R.A., which is dealt with in a special note,
and the splendid specimen of an Italian seventeenth-
century altar-cloth, with its delicate colouring, the
remainder of our plates are selected from the famous
'.. liOOfl
„- : >.0U'J
S--.089
111
oif. HBBQhAP"
DEFEAT ol
OF LEIPZIG
Bl IN IPARTE AT
I06
z
z
I
5
<
H
S
C
H
107
The Connoisseur
Althorp collection, which is owned by the Earl
Spencer. The very interesting portrait of Marv Qium
<>/ Scots, by Janet, is dealt with in Mr. Blaikie Mur-
doch's article on "Early Stuart Portraits" in the
present issue. The portrait of David Garrick, by
John Zoffany, R.A., represents the great actor gazing
at a medallion bearing Shakespeare's head on it, and
shows the artist in a very good aspect of his work.
The handling is free and the likeness a good one,
whilst the nature of the portrait precludes any little
inaccuracies of perspective which were not altogether
foreign to Zoffany's brush.
The most interesting of our plates this month is
perhaps the reproduction of the newly-discovered oil
portrait of J. M. W. Turner, R.A.,
A newly- r j
discovered by Edmund Wildman, junior. The
Portrait of circumstances under which the por-
J. M. W. Turner, trait was painted are not known, and
R A
the picture has not been mentioned
by any of the biographers of the artist. It was bought
recently by a private collector on its merits as a
picture and submitted to Mr. Algernon Graves, F.S.A.,
the well-known expert, for identification. He at once
recognised it as a portrait of Turner. The picture-
had on the back a partially covered label on the
lower part of which was inscribed, in contemporary
handwriting, " Painted by Edmund Wildman, junior,
1837." On the upper part of this label being uncovered,
Ci >n oboration of Mr. Graves's identification was found,
the remainder of the inscription giving the name of
the sitter as J. M. W. Turner, R.A. It is interesting
to recall, apropos of Mr. Graves's identification, that
he is among the few survivors of those who came into
actual contact with the great painter. Turner was
accustomed to visit Mr. Henry Graves, the father of
Mr. Algernon Graves, and many times dandled the
latter, when a baby, on his knee, a fact which shows
that the artist was by no means the misanthrope he
had the reputation of being. The only portrait for
which Turner is known to have given a sitting is the
pencil drawing of him, as a young man, by G. Dance,
now in the possession of the Royal Academy. Many
sketches were taken of him surreptitiously, but he
disliked this practice and did his best to hinder his
would-be portraitists. As most of the likenesses of
him drawn in this way are decidedly unflattering and
frequently verge on caricature, his distaste for them
can be well understood.
The strong characterisation of VVildman's portrait
and the well-studied rendering of the physiognomy of
the sitter afford practically indisputable evidence that
the picture was painted from life. Where and under
what circumstances it was painted must at present be
left to conjecture. There were two artists of the name
of Wildman, who, from the circumstance that one
appended junior to his name, were probably father
and son. The elder of the two was John R. Wildman,
who contributed domestic scenes and portraits to
various London exhibitions between the years 1S23
and 1839. Nothing is apparently known about him
except what can be gleaned from the catalogues
containing the record of his exhibited works. He
contributed an oil picture of a namesake — C. H.
Turner, Esq. — of the great landscape painter to the
Royal Academy of 1838, but as Turner was not on
terms of intimacy with his relatives, and none of the
latter appear to have possessed the initials " C. H.,"
the coincidence of surnames is probably only fortui-
tous. A feasible conjecture is that as the Wildmans
in 1823 were living at Poplar (and had probably been
living there for some time), not far from Blackwall
l'ier, from where one of the most striking views of the
Thames is to be obtained, Turner may have come
in touch with them during some of his sketching
expeditions. He often showed a disposition to assist
young artists, and may have sat to Wildman to give
him a helping hand, and then repenting, have sup-
pressed the portrait. Turner's interest in Wildman is
the more likely, as he was obviously a painter of great
promise. The portrait is a fluent and direct piece of
work, very good in its colour, and more especially in
its flesh-tones. The likeness of Turner has been set
down without flattery and without any element of
caricature. He has generally been described by his
contemporaries as an ugly man, but the ugliness lay
more in his short, stout figure than his face. The
latter, if not handsome, was marked by strength and
intelligence. The high forehead, large aquiline nose
and firm, set mouth could never have belonged to a
nonentity. Perhaps the sketch by Sir John Gilbert
most resembles the Wildman portrait, but the same
salient points in the painter's strongly marked features
are suggested in every likeness that has been made
by him, though generally they are emphasised to the
verge of caricature. The Wildman picture is the only
important oil portrait of Turner that we possess, and
the only one, with the exception of the drawing by
1 )ance, for which he can be said to have given sittings.
It thus possesses an unique interest, and it is to be
hoped that efforts may be made to secure it for the
nation. That an artist like Wildman, who could paint
a work of such sterling merit, should have been entirely
forgotten, need astonish no one who remembers how
the memories of many greater painters have only
been rescued from oblivion by painstaking investiga-
tions on the part of the modern student.
10S
n
Z
o
-
<
•J
r.
W
109
p
o
<
>
en
s.
2
O
<
2
THE RED CROSS SALE AT CHRISTIES
Porcelain
THE excitement of the season in the sale-room has been
undoubtedly the remarkable accumulation of antiquities
and objets d'art which were gathered to-
gether by public spirit and private self-
negation to be dispersed at Messrs. Christie, Manson &
Woods for the benefit of the British Red Cross Society
and the Order of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem
in England. The twelve days' auction opened on Mon-
day, April 1 2th, with the auspicious amount of 200 guineas
given for a beautiful Spode writing set ( 1 166 pattern) of
six pieces, painted with flowers in colours on a dark blue
ground, richly gilt with scale pattern, which had been
presented by Lady Wernher. A correspondent writing
to us in connection with the Red Cross sale says, "The
fact that old Spode was thought worthy by Messrs.
Christie to lead off this important sale speaks for itself,
and shows how the value of this factory's beautiful work,
little known until quite lately, has advanced in the last
few years." The second lot, presented by Mr. T. Can-
non, a Spode tea service, decorated with lotus in colours
and gold in the Chinese taste, and H6-H6 birds in blue
round the border, consisting of thirty-three pieces, fetched
35 gns. An old Worcester cream-jug and < over, painted
with exotic birds in oval panels, with gilt borders on
mottled dark blue ground, presented by the Hon. Mrs.
A \< land, went for 40 gns., whilst an old Worce <
sugar-basin and cover, painted with exotic birds il
panels with gilt borders on a dark blue scale-pattern
background, from the same donor, was knocked down at
39 gns. Turning to Chelsea ware, a porcelain scent
bottle, made in the form of a monkey carrying its young
in a pannier, the gift of Mr. A. Weil, fetched 40 gns. A
Chelsea figure of "Justice" on a red, green, and gold
scroll plinth, 13J in. high, was sold for 50 gns., the
highest bid being made by Mis. Coutts - Michie, the
donor. A pair of Derby-Chelsea figures on gilt scroll
plinths, 10 in. high in all, entitled "The Sailor and his
La . brought 33 gns. They were presented by Mrs.
Clement Parsons. Amongst the continental porci
the new Baron de Rothschild's Sevres ecuelle, with
co 1 and stand, painted with rosebuds in circular
medallions and knots of blue riband in gold bin
fetched 150 gns.; whilst 350gn wa fen for Sir Geoi
Donaldson's set of three Sevres hard-paste pore
vases, two of them with covers, decorated with .1
bleu ground richly gilt with branches of oak foliage and
bulrushes, and each vase finely painted with military
scenes and trophies in two oval medallions, the handles
modelled as foliage issuing into formal strap-work, and
the gilding by Henri Prevost, 17.1 in. and [8 in. high.
On the fourth day of the sale, which occurred on
April 15th, the Oriental porcelain came under auction.
Mr. P. L. Agnew's pair of Nankin oviform jars and co 1
painted with flower sprays in blue lambrequin boi
with scrolls reserved in white, Si in. high, were knocked
down at 50 gns. ; Mr. A. Wertheimei - pah <>l Chinese
famille-rose figures of deities, with richly enamelled
robes, Kien-lung period, mounted on ormolu plinth "I
Louis XV. design, 11 in. high, |; gns. ; Mr. G. Eui
fopoulos's Chinese stoneware fish-bowl, creamy gla
decorated in relievo with hunting scenes. 15 in. high,
20J- in. diameter, probably Sung dynasty, .;" gns. This
piece was exhibited at the Victoria and Albert Musi
111 1 < > 1 1-12, and at Manchester in 1913.
On April 2 1st a further selection of porcelain was put
up, when Mr. John Walter's Berlin tea and coffi
painted with landscapes, etc., brought 100 gns.
Till large collection of drawings ami paintings which
were dispersed on the fifth day oi tin- Red Cross sale,
April (6th, was remarkably interesting
Drawings and .- , .,' ,
_ , , ° on account ol showing the appeal <>t
raintings , , ,. . .,.,
art to the public 111 w n I me. I he nrsl
of a series "i works by the late Jam< i! rock, < '// the
Nith, 1899, in oils, 31 J in. by 49J in., presented b) Sil
\Y. II. Lever, let, he, 1 75 gns. The same donoi - Hilly
Lands, in. by 9 in., by J. M. W.Turner, realised
|o gns Capt. II. I Butlei \ View in Rouen, si in. by
4 in., b) Birket Fosti . ; and Mr. O. Gutekunst's
Turner, Sunset on ///<■ Sea, 7-J in. by u>i in., 85 gns.
The la 1 med lot was sui 1 ■ . the first <>i the
■■ empl ii .hi" -," w hen Mi Muirhi
te a pen, 'I ,li ,iv, .1. , 1 by 8 in., ol
,:. architectural subject in I ondon to the order of the
highest bidder, who exciti til was
, aused when the two " frame to bi filli d h th cha
The Connoisseur
portraits by Mr. I. S. Sargent were put up. The first,
the sight measurement being 24 in. by 19 in., fell to
Mr. Charles for 500 gns. . whilst the second, of the same
dimensions, was secured by Mr. Wythes for 650 gns.
Mr. Charles Sims's Figure Piece, 28| in. by 21 in., was
knocked down at 70 gns. ; a 21 in. by 29 in. drawing by
Sir John Millais, representing an Attack on Kenilworth
Castle, which had been presented by the artist to the
donor, Major-General A. R. Lempriere, for having posed
as the model in The Huguenot, 22 gns. ; a red chalk ot
a Female Head, 154 in. by 11] in., presented by the
executors of the artist, the late Sir E. Burne-Jones,
22 gns. ; Mr. \V. Lockett Agnew's Ostend Canal, Bruges,
20J in. by 31J in., by J. B. Crome, 50 gns. : and.-/
Fores! Glade, 29 in. by 21 J in., by P. Wilson Steer,
75 gns. Another "empty frame," this time to be filled
by P. A. de Laszlo, fell to Sir F. Trippel for 750 gns.,
the sight measurement being 35 in. by 27 in., whilst the
same artist's Portrait of Madame Marthe Lettelier, 1914.
realised 160 gns. Three portraits "yet to be" followed
at short intervals. That presented by Mr. Gerald Festus
Kelly brought 150 gns. (sight measurement 32^ in. by
26 in.) ; that by Mr. A. E. John, 210 gns. (sight measure-
ment 23J in. by 19J in.) ; that by Mr. William Orpen,
460 gns. (sight measurement 42 in. by 32J in., Mrs.
Fleming) ; that by Mrs. S. E. Waller, 100 gns. (sight
measurement 28 in. by 23 in., Lady Levinge) : and that
by Sir James Guthrie, 420 gns. (sight measurement 29 in.
by 23 in. ). In the Orchard, 1914, by E. A. Hornel, 29J in.
by 245 in., sold for 60 gns. ; Miss Stimpson's Cavalier of
the Time of Louis XIII., by Meissonier, on a panel,
7i in. by 3! in., from the artist's sale, 100 gns. ; The
Invaders, 27 in. by 35* in., by Tom Mostyn, ;o gns. ;
Glencoe, 18 in. by 22J in., by D. V. Cameron, 130 gns. ;
The Monastery from St. Bernardino's Cell, Assisi, by
Sir W. B. Richmond, on a panel, 27J in. by 151 in.,
2(1 gns. ; and Sir Luke Fildes's Marietta, 191 5, 25 in.
by 19 in., 105 gns. Mrs. Barlow made the highest bid
of 240 gns. for the Hon. John Collier's blank canvas of
45 in. by 43 in. 1 sight measurement ), whilst 400 gns. was
paid for that by John Lavery, ^3 in. by 26J in., under the
same measurement. Some subject and other pictures
followed close on Mrs. Barlow's acquisition. A 14J in.
by 29 in. painting of Destroyer versus Submarine, by
W. I.. Wyllie, fetched ^50; Mr. S. Wilson's gift of Com-
ing Events, by G. A. Storey, 23J in. by 19J in., which
was exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1895, 63 gns..
and the same donor's La Boucherie, 22J in. by 31] in.,
by H. Le Sidanier, 58 gns. ; Sir W. H. Houldsworth's
In a Cottage Garden, or the Sawing-Horse, 45 in. by
34 j in., by H. H. La Thangue, exhibited at the Royal
Academy in 1S96, 110 gns. ; and Le Mort de Napoleon,
by R. Steuben, which was presented by Millicent,
Duchess of Sutherland, 55 gns. This picture, which
measures 3c4 in. by jSh in., was in the collection of the
Princess Murat, who bequeathed it to Lady Murat. A
framed key, together with a small framed print by
Lerouge, were sold with the painting. For 50 gns. Philip
Connard's prospective portrait, sight measurement 24 in.
by 20 in., went to Mrs. Shoebacher, and Mr. Warner
gained that by H. G. Riviere, sight measurement 25 in.
by 21 in., for 130 gns. Mr. Joicey secured for 20 gns. W.
Cunningham Hector's "empty frame" of29j in. by 243 in.
sight measurement, whilst Sir Guy Francis Laking paid
105 gns. for one of 25 1 in. by 2ii in. sight measurement,
to be executed by N. Cambier. Mr. A. S. Cope had
presented his painting (225 in. by 19 in. of Miranda,
101 5, which was knocked down at 50 gns. ; Mr. George
J. Coates's 29J in. by 19J in. subject of A Spanish
Dancer, 130 gns. ; and J. Pettie's The Ransom, 210 gns.
This picture, which was presented by Mr. Arthur C.
Armitage, and measured 42 in. by 59 in., was exhibited
at the Royal Academy exhibition in 1883. The last lot
on the day's programme was Poissons d'At'rii, a three-
leaf screen, 70 in. high by 75 in. wide, decorated in the
Japanese taste, on a gold ground, by Miss Maud Earl,
the donor. The highest bid made for it was 85 gns.
Amongst the modern drawings on April 19th a pastel,
20J in. by 192 in., feunesse, by Mdlle. Lorenzetto, the
donor, brought 66 gns., and Bernard Partridge's original
Punch cartoon of The Excursionist, 26 gns. A portrait
head of H.R. H. the Prince of Wales, February iSth,
1904, by the late E. A. Abbey, R.A., fetched 42 gns.
This work, which is executed in pastel on toned paper,
and measures 14 in. by ioi in., was a study for the
artist's Coronation of King Edward VII., and has been
autographed by the Prince.
On the seventh day of the sale some miniatures were
put to auction, and one of The Hon. Mrs. Hervey, by
John Smart, 1767, signed with initials and dated, set in
a gold ring, in shagreen case, fetched 100 gns. On
April 23rd, the tenth day of sale, a further instalment of
pictures and drawings came under notice. A Punch
cartoon, For the Wounded, by F. H. Townsend. 1915, pre-
sented by Mr. Philip L. Agnew, was eventually knocked
down for 320 gns. to the Hon. A. Stanley, who said
that he had bought it on behalf of the Red Cross Society
and the Order of St. John of Jerusalem in England, who
wished to present it to the firm of Christie as some token
of recognition for the work they were doing. The gift
was accepted in appropriate terms. Later in the day the
Rt. Hon. Laurence Hardy's Holy Family, with St.fohn
in a Landscape, by Titian, 21 J in. by 283 in., from Lord
Petre's collection, realised 220 gns.
We now understand that Mr. A. E. John's "empty
frame. " to the sale of which mention has already been
made above, is to enclose a portrait of the Chancellor of
the Exchequer. 1 >n the last day of the sale it was announced
that Mr. f. S. Sargent had given out his intention of
further benefiting the object of the sale by painting a
portrait in oils for the sum of £ 10,000, which offer was
provisionally accepted by the late Sir Hugh Lane.
The result of the sixth day's sale, on April 19th, can
hardlv be described as productive of any exciting results.
Amongst the modern etchings. The
Engravings and Pgrtals 0f Rheims Cathedral, by Axel
Etchings Raig) presented by Mr , p Blak6i
was knocked down at 40 gns., and of the modern en-
gravings, La Surbrise, by S. Cousins, after C. M. DubufFe.
/// the Sale Room
Silver
a proof before any letters, brought 50 gns. It was the
gift of Mr. E. J. Wythes. Mr. A. L. Payne's contribution
of Miss .1/./. donald, by S. Cousins, after Sir T. Lawrence,
a proof before letters, made 35 gns. Three of the old
engravings realised sums worthy of mention. They were
Mrs. Cos-way, by V. Green, after Maria Cosway, a first
state Sir G. \V. Agnew, donor), which realised 65 gns. ;
Mr. C. Morland Agnew's Mrs. L',tni<ii. by J. R. Smith,
after Sir J. Reynolds, 40 gns. : and Miss Curtler's Mrs.
Duff, by |. Agar, after R. Cosway, in colours, 42 gns.
April 14TH, the third day of the Red Cross sale, opened
with the collection of silver, which contained some speci-
mens of remarkable historical interest.
The gift of an anonymous donor was
the pair of plain circular salt-cellars, on round moulded
feet, engraved on the rims, "Aldn. James Burleigh, to
the Corporation of Cambridge, June, 1764'' I weight,
7 oz. 18 dwt.), which realised 25 gns. The Misses Yallen-
tin presented a Queen Anne plain tankard, yh in. high,
with domed cover and scroll handle, by John Ruslen, 1709
(weight, 29 oz. 12 dwt. i, which was knocked down at 40
gns. It should be noted that the silver was sold "all
at." ( Ither lots of importance were Mr. W. A. Brigg's
George I. plain oblong tea-caddy, by Peter Archambo,
circa 1722 gross weight, iSoz. 7 dwt. . engraved with the
Byron arms, 52 gns. ; Mr. Alfred James's three George I.
plain octagonal casters, 7} in. and 5! in. high, 1723
weight, 21 oz. 7 dwt.), 80 gns. : Sir Ernest Cassel's gift
of three oblong tea-caddies, embossed with shields and
scroll foliage, 1766 (weight, 25 oz. 6 dwt. . in silver-mounted
shagreen case, which were re-purchased by him for 140
gns. ; Messrs. Mallett's Charles II. plain porringer, with
shaped sides and scroll handles, 3J in. diam., 1684,
maker's mark, P.M., with mullet and fleur-de-lys below
(weight, 5 oz. 18 dwt.), 48 gns. ; and Major F. B. Dal-
rymple's pair of old Irish silver-gilt dishes, by William
Townsend, Dublin, circa 1750, mounted on fluted feet at
a slightly later date weight, 46 oz. 9 dwt.), 42 gns. The
next lot but one had a singularly pathetic interest. The
two Irish potato rings, by Richard Williams, Dublin,
1774 (weight, 10 oz. 8 dwt. and 8 oz. 10 dwt. respectively),
which had belonged to the late Samuel Pepys Cockerell,
of the Royal Flying Corps, and which had been given to
the sale by his parents, were purchased by Lord Newland
for 500 gns. each. A Queen Anne plain tankard, with
flat cover, 8 in. high, by Richard Wilcocks, Exeter. 1704
(weight, 26 oz. 12 dwt. . fell for ,£63. It had been pre-
sented by Mr. Thomas Taylor. Mr. H. J. H. Clements's
George I. plain shaving-dish, by Bowles Nash. 1722, and
a spherical soap-box, by the same, engraved w ith the
arms of the 1st Earl of Leitrim weight. 33 oz. 15 dwt. .
brought 72 gns.; Mrs. Milieu's inter' ting [acobean
goblet, with V-shaped bowl, on short baluster stem, and
circular spreading foot, the lip engraved, "James Ware.
Vintener at the King's Armes in Catteaton Street, sav'd
out of the Fire of London," 3i in. high (weight, 5 oz. 2 dwt.).
62 gns. ; Mr. Allied de Rothschild's Elizabethan
ware jug, mounted with silver - gilt neckband, cover
and foot, the neckband engraved with scroll folia] 1
strap-work borders, the cover embossed and chased with
masks and fruit, and with mermaid thumb-piece, the foot
edged by a narrow band of stamped fluting. 1571. 7' in-
high, maker's mark, a bunch of grapes, ]6ogns. ; Miss
Seymour Kerr's plain two-handled cup and cover, with
gadrooned borders and scroll handles chased with fol
by Thomas Whipham and Charles Wright, 1764. 16 in.
weight. 92 oz. 16 dwt.), 180 gns. This piece is
engraved with the arms of Admiral Frankland, to whom
presented by Elizabeth Ffytche in 177 1. A relic
of the assassinated Spencer Perceval was presented by .1
grand-daughter, Mrs. Francis Holland. It consisted of
a circular soup-tureen, cover and liner, partly fluted, and
with gadrooned borders, the handles chased as serpents,
1807 weight, 176 oz. 14 dwt.). The highest bid was 70
gns. The Lord d'Abemon's gift of a Turner-ware mug.
decorated with Cupid and Psyche in relief, brown neck,
mounted with silver lip and cover, which is inscribed,
"This mug originally belonged to Lord Viscount Xelson,
was presented to Capt. Mackellar by Sir Thos. Hardy.
Bart.," fetched 30 gns. The foreign silver opened
auspiciously with the sum of 135 gns. given for Mr. T. R.
Ker's silver-gilt standing cup and cover, elaborately deco-
rated,of German 16th-century work weight. 14 117. I 7 dwt. ;
Lady Wernher's tazza, of German 17th-century origin,
highly ornamented, the stem formed as a kneeling negro,
9 in. high, 8 J in. diam. gross weight, 25 oz. 8 1
brought 52 gns. ; and H.M. Queen Alexandra's - 11 "I
a foreign wager cup, formed as a figure of a lady, sup-
porting a cup above her head. 15 in. high weight.
36 oz. 7 dwt. , was knocked down at 140 gns.
< in the seventh day of the sale, April 20th. a further
assortment of silver was sold "all at." An anonymous
donor gave an oval bread-basket, pierced with panels of
trellis-work and diapers divided by beaded bands, and with
gadroon and shell borders, 1762 weight, 32 oz. 10 dwt. .
which fetched 56 gns. ; and the Lord Redesdale's shell-
shaped silver-gilt dish, repousse and chased in the 1 entri
with the choice of Paris, and with honeysuckle ornament
round the border, l8J in. wide weight, 62 oz. 10 dwt. .
23 gns. This piece, which is Italian work of the 17th cen-
tury, came from the collection of the Earl of Ashburnham.
THE collection of jewellery was dispersed on April 13th.
tli.- second da) of the -ale. hut did nut realise such high
prices .is might have been anticipated
Jewel Icrv
A net kla< e, oi gold enamel, cop ed from
the original in the London Must-urn, and made by the
donor, Mr. Felix Joubert. brought £22; an amethyst
bead necklace, with diamond barrel-shaped snap, pre-
sented by Mis. Adolph Weil, £36; a brilliant flower
brooch and pendant, presented b) Miss Duffy,
pair (if single brilliant earrings, anonymous donor, /(50:
and a pearl necklace, coi ting ol t»i> hundred and
thirty-three pearls, with pearl and brilliant clustei snap,
anonymous donor, ^160. Tin- Countess Bathurst's
brilliant brooch, with a star and cresci in brilliants
icen enamel centre, in ordei of collet brilliants in a
1 il diamond folia e, \o. It had I > 1 1.
■ nted to the late Lady Glenesk by the Sultan
The Connoisseur
Hamid. Beyond the following lots there were but few
sums of any importance realised. Of the three, Mr.
Robert Campbell's pair of single brilliant earrings was
sold for ,£56; Mrs. Robertson's brilliant Maltese cross
pendant, or brooch, .£115; and the same donor's brilliant
rosette brooch, the centre set with hair surrounded by
eight brilliants, ,£195. On April 20th a further instalment
of jewellery came under the hammer, but the only piece
of any real interest was that presented by Lady Jekyll, a
gold thistle-shaped seal, set with an emerald engraved
with the arms and cypher of Mary Queen of Scots, which
vva knocked down at 45 gns.
( )N May 4th, 5th, and 6th Messrs. Knight, Frank and
Rutley dispersed the stock of Harper's Antique Galleries
( (Ashford, Kent) at their Hanover
r- ,T c , Square rooms. The stock consisted
Galleries Sale . , ,
mainly 01 furniture, and the first lot
to realise a sum of any importance was a walnut and
ebonised cabinet, with boldly carved masks, festooned
columns, acanthus leaf and fluted borders, the upper part
fitted with numerous drawers, with Venetian glass panels
engraved in classical and sporting subjects, with mirror
bai ks, a cupboard in centre enclosing a shrine of inlaid
ivory, with small side drawers, a cupboard with shelf
below, S ft. high, 5 ft. 6 in. wide, which fetched .£30. This
elaborate piece was presented to Lord Napier and Ettrick
when Ambassador at Berlin. A Georgian inlaid maho-
gany circular dining table, with gadroon border, on carved
supports and underframe, 5 ft. diam., with eight extra
parts, enlarging to 5 ft. 8 in. and 6 ft. 4 in. diam., brought
£}j 1 2s. ; a set of 12 Chippendale mahogany dining-room
chairs, ,£45 ; a Hepplewhite inlaid mahogany break-front
bookcase, with trellis glazed doors, cupboards under, and
panelled doors with festooned decoration, on fluted legs,
scroll and vase ornamented cornice, 9 ft. 6 in. high, 8 ft.
wide, ,£86 2s. ; an Adam mahogany sideboard, with
pedestals and knife urns, carved in rams' heads, husk
festoons, classic vases, lion masks, etc., on lion-claw feet,
the pedestals fitted with drawers, cupboard, and cellarette,
10 ft. 6 in. wide, from Gilling Castle, Yorks., ,£210; and
a Chippendale gilt w-all mirror, carved in scrolls, foliage,
birds, shells, etc., 5 ft. 6 in. high, 3 ft. 6 in. wide, ,£52 10s.
Later on, a Georgian mahogany bookcase, with trellis
glazed doors, rounded ends, carved cornice, fluted
columns, and six drawers below with brass drop handles,
8 ft. 6 in. wide, 8 ft. high, realised ,£30 ; whilst another,
with break-front and panelled doors below the trellis
glazed ones, dentil cornice, with swan-neck pediment,
9 ft. 4 in. high, 9 ft. wide, was knocked down for ^31 10s.
On April 30th and May 1st a collection of various
properties and effects was dispersed at Mr. Dowell's
rooms, iS, George Street, Edinburgh,
An Edinburgh , . , j .
_ , & when an antique crystal decanter, in
Art Sale ■ , ' ,
morocco case, said to have belonged
to Mary Queen of Scots, realised £29 8s., and a lock
of Queen Mary's hair, £13. This was "part of a larger
lock which was in the possession of Lord Belhaven and
Stenton at Wishaw House. Lord Belhaven bequeathed
the cabinet with the lock of hair to the late Queen
Victoria, and this cabinet and the hair in it is in Windsor
Castle corridor. The hair for sale has been in the pos-
session of the present owner for fifty years." Amongst
the furniture an old draught screen of six leaves, finely
decorated in the Chinese taste, fetched ,£52 10s., and six
old Queen Anne walnut chairs, with shaped backs and
cabriole legs, earned with shell and floral scroll design,
claw-and-ball feet, £72 9s. Amongst the china, a choice
Worcester dessert service, with painted flower centres,
gros-bleu and buff bands, decorated in gold, 36 pieces,
brought ,£30 ; and a Leeds tea and coffee set, with
finely painted flower panels of marine shells on cerise-
coloured ground, gilt edges, 78 pieces, ,£25 4s. Not the
least interesting part of the sale consisted in the col-
lection of jewellery belonging to the estate of Lady
Menzies. The highest bid was ,£221 lis., given for a
magnificent diamond scroll leaf and spray necklace, with
seven large colleted sprays pendant. Other prices were
,£81 for a magnificent cluster bracelet, of large sapphire
and diamond alternate collet and trefoil border, with
four brilliants on shoulders ; £40 for an elegant diamond
five-leaf flower brooch : and .£38 for a gold snake neck-
lace, with beautifully enamelled head mounted with
diamonds, and particularly fine and large rose-cut
sapphire.
At a sale of decorative furniture, etc., from various
properties, which was held by Messrs. Knight, Frank and
Rutley at their rooms on April 16th,
a Chippendale inlaid, carved, mahog-
any, shaped-front cabinet, 2 ft. 7 in.
wide by 6 ft. high, the upper part fitted with a cupboard,
enclosed by a pair of doors inlaid with mother-o'-pearl,
and the centre fitted with small drawers and pigeon-holes,
draw-out slide in centre and four drawers below, realised
/S4; and a Louis XVI. carved gilt frame settee, the seat
and back in needlework, 6 ft. wide, fetched ,£18 18s.
Both these pieces formed part of the Shannon heirlooms,
and were sold by order of the executrix of the late Coun-
tess. The property of a nobleman were a Louis XVI.
writing table, on fluted taper legs, with richly chased
ormolu mounts, fitted with six drawers, 6 ft. 6 in. wide,
which was knocked down for .£441 ; an old French par-
queterie commode of two long and three small drawers,
on cabriole legs, with chased ormolu mounts and handles
and marble top, 4 ft. 3 in. wide, signed P. Roussel,
.£378 ; an antique parqueterie commode of four drawers,
with shaped front, ormolu mounts and handles, 4 ft. 3 in.
wide, .£100; and a Chippendale oblong-shape table,
with cluster column stretcher and legs, 2 ft. 9 in. long,
£7$. At the same sale a William and Mary walnut-
frame armchair, in needlework, brought the sum of
,£45 ; and a full-length Portrait of a Lady, with land-
scape background, 80 in. by 44 in-, of the school of
Reynolds, fetched ,£65 2s.
The Shannon
Sale
114
*&J ir.A>m Ml
£7*
■
V %
L&i
u
<
^
natu$efftt
Iscmmfrr
(Turn
abed)
M>
B°OKSHELF
^=fl^
Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Pennell's volume on Litho-
rapkers — the first, qf the new " Graphic
Art-, Series" — is likely to be attract ivc
to collectors. The 79 illustrations,
1 i 11 occupying (though not always
filling a page 12 in. by 8 in., would
alone suffice to make the book worth
buying, while the letterpress 1 overs
,i more extended field than any other
work on the subject. The book as
a whole is somewhat disappointing.
It bears signs of having been hastily written, and the con-
tinuous carping at things English, though not altogether
unjustified, glows rather tiresome. One of the difficulties
ol writing a history of lithography appears to lie in the
prodigious number of artists who have made essays in
the medium. Mr. and Mrs. Pennell mention about six
hundred. Of these some are great lithographers, ,t
number are greal artists who have dabbled in
" Lithography and
Lithographers,"
by Joseph Pennell
and E. Robins
Pennell. ("The
Graphic Arts
Series "
T. Fisher Unwin
ios. 6d. net)
lithography, anil the majority are men who have done
good work without attaining greatness. Extensive
the record, there appear to be one or two noteworthy
omissions, such as Fran/ Kriiger, the battle painter, one of
the pioneers ofthe art in Germany, and Kriehuber,who per-
formed a similar office in Austria. The treatment ofthe
artists mentioned is unequal. Oxer five pagi
to Whistler, against three-quarters of a page to Fantin-
Latour, and a little over a page t<> Menzel : while someof
the earlier masters, such as Bonnington and Monnier, arc
accorded only a paragraph, and many clever living artist-
have to be content with a bare mention of their nai
The preference given to Whistler is partly justified on
account of the great influence his work exercised in
promoting the revival of lithography in England : yel 50
much has been written about him, and his lithographs
have been s.> fully catalogued and described, that one
could have wished the authors had devoted less
to his work and more to that of other masters, now
M
...... 2 ;3ci — —
YOT!
/. hit '. • - /
1 Ml' >•'' ' '" " U ''•' "l' VWING 1 HI 1") 1 : , -,- , AM, , ,,.)
"7
The C 'onnoisseur
neglected, but equally deserving of attention. The facts
connected with the invention of lithography by Senefelder,
his subsequent career, and the early developments of the
art, are fully recorded, and make interesting reading.
England was behindhand in the adoption of lithography
to artistic purposes, a fact which affords the authors
opportunity for caustic comment. It must be remem-
bered, however, that in England, at the time, all methods
of engraving, with the exception of etching, had reached
an exceptionally high standard, and that consequently
there was less scope here for the new medium than on
the Continent, where engraving was in a less flourishing
condition. Senefelder came over to this country in 1800
and took out various patents. His desire appears to
have been to exploit the commercial possibilities of his
invention rather than the artistic. A few artists made
experimental essays in the medium, then known under
the name of polyautography ; and a book was published
in 1803 containing examples by Stothard, Fuseli, Barry,
Barker, West, and other well-known painters. In the
same year — not in 1804, as stated by Mrs. Pennell —
Charles Heath showed "a specimen of polyanthrogrphy"
( Hi ) .it the Royal Academy. Little more artistic work
appeared in this country for well over a decade. Then
the revival, or, rather, the real introduction, of the art took
place. The chief instruments in this were R. Ackermann,
the well-known publisher, and C. Hullmandel, who
became an accomplished lithographer, but earned more
distinction as a printer. Mrs. Pennell gives 1819 as the
date when Ackermann began to publish lithographs, but
one, by Front, appeared in his Repository in 1817.
Ackermann was then the leading publisher of winks
illustrated in aquatint ; during the next few years he
began to introduce lithography in its stead, and by 1830
the earlier method was almost entirely superseded.
Among the earlier English artists who helped to popu-
larise lithography was Francis Nicholson, a prominent
member of the Old Water Colour Society. His Sketches
from British Scenery, published in 1821, contained eighty-
one large lithographs ; and he is reputed to have made
over 700 in the course of his career. Though only a
moderate artist, he should have been mentioned as one
of the English pioneers of the art. A far greater litho-
grapher was J. D. Harding, who is said to have appeared
for the first time as a worker on stone in Britannia De-
lineata, published in 1822; earlier work by him, however,
is to be found in the ilea's to illustrate tin- Route of the
Simplon, by Major J. F. Cockburn, of which he executed
49 out of 50 in 1820-21. Apropos of Harding, a rather
futile attack is made upon Ruskin, because in a note to
his Elements of Drawing, published in 1857, he warned
his readers against allowing lithographs, with the exception
of those by Prout and Lewis, to enter their houses. The
authors ask if he had "forgotten Harding, his former
drawing master and friend." This enquiry and the accu-
sation of being "foolish" and "amusing" might have
been justified if Ruskin had been regarding lithographs
in any other light than that of affording subjects for
elementary students to copy. So far from forgetting Hard-
ing, he devotes several pages of his book to an extended
examination of his work, which he highly praises. R. J.
Lane was another of the early lithographers ; he is singled
out as being the "only lithographer ever made an
Associate of the Royal Academy," but as a matter of
fact he was elected on his merits as a line engraver.
The Royal Academy at the time hardly recognised
lithography as art. James Ward and J. J. Chalon were
almost its only members who worked on stone, and most
of the best original work was produced by members of
the Old Water Colour Society. The medium was exten-
sively employed in the interests of art until well into the
sixties, when it became almost wholly degraded to com-
mercial uses. Its revival commenced about thirty years
later. Professor Legros, who worked in lithography as
early as the middle of the nineteenth century, was the
connecting-link between the two periods; and Whistler,
who practised in lithography since 1878, was the forerunner
of the new movement. Mr. Joseph Pennell, as president
of the Senefelder Club, the most important artistic litho-
graphic society in the world, has done much to popularise
modern original lithography in England and secure it
official recognition. The account of the recent develop-
ments in the art is therefore largely the fruit of personal
knowledge. The chapters on the technique of the art,
which conclude the volume, are entirely the work of Mr.
Pennell himself. LTnfortunately, they are wanting in
lucidity, and some of the statements they contain appear
to be contradictory. Thus, as regards the substitution of
metal plates for lithographic stones, we are told on pages
246-247 : " Zinc and aluminium are extensively used to
replace the stones, as they answer equally well . . . The
professional lithographer will tell you that a zinc or
aluminium plate will not give prints as good as those from
the stone. There is no truth in it." In almost direct
opposition to this it is stated on page 14 : " After a hun-
dred years of experimenting till to-day, no such satisfactory
material for printing from has been found as the Kelheim
(i.e. lithographic) stone" ; and on page 250 : " It is a fact,
however, that it is very much easier, once the drawing is
being printed, if corrections are to be made, to make them
on the stone, or to remove work from stone than from
metal." Most lithographers believe that impressions
richer and more sympathetic in feeling can be obtained
from stone. Perhaps the best criterion of the matter is
that, though metal plates have been in use for nearly a
hundred years, Mr. Pennell only reproduces a single litho-
graph taken from one. This is a pen-and-ink caricature
of The Nightmare, by F. Sandys, a work that is character-
ised by practically no distinctively lithographic qualities.
That a fourth edition of Sir A. H. Church's book on
The Chemistry of Paints and Paint-
"The Chemistry ings has been issued is a sufficient
of Paints and proof of its value. It is to be re-
Paintings," by Sir gretted that no work on this impor-
A. H. Church tant subject is likely to attain a very
(Seeley, Service extended sale, for neither artists
and Co- nor collectors devote to it any-
7s, 6d. net) thin^ like the attention ;t deserves.
The former, for the most part, are content to receive
iS
The Connoisseur Bookshelf
their pigments and other
materials from their
colourman without in-
quiring closely into their
composition, and the latter
buy pictures and drawings
with a child-like faith in
their durability. It speaks
well for the rectitude of
makers of artists' materi-
als that this faith is not
more frequently mis-
placed, yet for every per-
manent but expensive
colour that is produced by
reliable firms there are
countless imitations
placed on the market,
equally attractive in ap-
pearance, far less costly,
but also far less perma-
nent. Not a few artist-
are taken in by these, and
their pictures and patrons
suffer accordingly. But
even the best materials
are sub'ject to certain
drawbacks, which require
to be understood before
permanent work can be
produced. Every picture
should be regarded as an essay in chemistry
which are durable bv themselves
■ i OF ARMS ON BEDPOST AT BROI'GHTON CHI
I'ER BY PERMISSION OF THE
HISTORIC SOCIETY OF LANI A-IIIRE AND CHESHIRE
Pigments
become evanescent
when laid on in conjunction with others ; many which
will stand a full north light fade when exposed to the
direct action of the sun ; others deteriorate in darkness ;
so that the preservation of a picture or drawing demands
some knowledge of its components both on the part ot
its creator and custodian. How generally lacking this
knowledge has been in the past may be seen by the
number of faded and practically ruined works contained
in public and private collections. Some of these were
doomed to destruction from the moment they were
painted, but others, and probably the majority, might
have been preserved if awarded judicious treatment.
1'rofessor Church's book, without entering too techni-
cally into the subject, puts the essential facts into an
easily comprehended form. The chapters on painting
grounds, which include such variable materials as paper,
canvas, wood, ivory, etc., are most valuable. Of equal
utility are those on the mediums used to convey
colours; while the tables of safe, uncertain, and fleet-
colours should be kept on hand for reference
by every artist. The book goes thoroughly into the
question of the preservation of pictures, and numer-
ous simple tests are given to determine the purity
of materials. The author has embodied in his new
edition the fruits of the latest research into the sub-
ject, and the book is now as handy and as up-to-date
a work on this important theme as can well be dc
"Juliette Drouet's Love
Letters to Victor Hugo,"
by Louis Guimbard
Translated by Lady
Theodora Davidson
(Stanley Paul & Co.
ios. 6d. net)
Juliette Drou
] xttos t« Victor Hugo
express a devotion which
would be incredible in
fiction and hardly ever
occurs in real life. They
are among the most ten-
der and passionate which
have been penned from
mistress to lover, and are
the outcome of a life
wholly given up to a single
absorbing passion. The
letters, numbering over
fifteen thousand, were
overed by M. Louis
('.uiinii. ii.l. a. distinguished
member of the French
A.i ademy. He has made
a judicious selection of
them for publication, and
prefaced it with a
interesting account of
Juliette and her relations
with the great French poet. The book has been well
translated by Lady Theodora Davidson, and the
Iish version loses little if any of the charm of the
original. Julienne Josephine Gauvain, subsequently
known as Madame Juliette Drouet, was twenl
when she first met Victor Hugo, who was four years
older. This was in the spring of 1832. At that time the
poet was at the zenith of h . he had written In-
most famous novel, Notre Damede Paris, in the pre
year, and his most popul.tr tragedy. Hemani, a year
earlier. Juliette is described as a beautiful woi
•• -he shone and dazzled especially by her all-conquering
air of youth and ingenuousness . . . her smile
movements kept her still a girl. Her gait was, in fact,
-,, fairy-like that her admirers all make use, certainly
without collusion, of the adjective aericn.
sented a perfect image of calmness and purity." Hugo s
attire and appearance were not then call ulated to ensure
his social success. Mr allowed "himseli to be dn
by his tailor- in the fashions of four or fivi irlier :
his trousers were firmly braced above the wa
drawn over his boots, and fastened under the
steel chain . . . he was a worthy citizen desirous oi
being in the fashion, but unable to compass it." They
met at a ball, and Juliette - have been
attracted to the poet immediately. Si\ months wa- to
elapse, however, before they again came into contact,
the occasion being that Juliette wa- entrusted with a
minor part in H of 1 They
no
The Connoisseur
were thrown together during the rehearsals, and the
actress appears to have done all she could to win the
affections of the poet. Me reciprocated her sentiments,
and there commenced an intimacy which was only ter-
minated with Juliette Drouet's death in 1883, when she
was in her seventy-eighth year. She wrote to the poet
whether they were separated or in close companionship ;
and this accounts for the prodigious number of the
original letters. They breathe a spirit of warm devotion
and an almost excessive adulation on her part, which
Hugo apparently accepted a- his right. They continue
in the same strain throughout, her last letter, written
shortly before her death, consisting of a single sentence :
" I do not know where I be this time next year, but I
am proud and happy to sign my life-certificate for 1S83
with this one word, I love you." Many of the illustra-
tions are reproduced from Victor Hugo's original draw-
ings, which conclusively show that, had he had time and
inclination to cultivate his talent, he might have attained
distinction as an artist.
We are indebted to the Rev. W. F. John Timbrell for
bringing to the notice of antiquarians four remarkable
carved oak bedposts, which now
"The Medieval supportthewestgalleryinBroughton
Bedposts in Church. Mr. Timbrell was attracted
Broughton by thg evident jntere5t attaching to
Church, Chester," ,, ,■ , ■ , , r. •
' „. ' these relics, which are 0 ft. 3 in. in
by the Rev. W. F. , . . , , ., . J ...
_. , ,, height, carved on the knops with
)ohn Timbrell, , , , , • ,
„T . , .. coats of arms, and elsewhere with
M.A. (is. net)
badges and other ornament. 1'he
upper part of each post bears the running vine-trail
decoration in the Gothic style. From the nature of the
coats of arms and other details, the author has evolved
the very ingenious theory that the posts formed a part of
the nuptial couch of Henry VII. and Elizabeth of York,
the latter being descended in the female line from Lady
Cicely Neville, whose brother, the Baron Bergavenny,
« as ancestor of Rector Neville of Hawarden, who placed
the posts in Broughton Church in 1824. Unfortunately
for the Rev. Mr. Timbrell's argument, which, it is only
fair to state, is advanced with some diffidence, although
the work is undoubtedly English, indications point to
a date not earlier than the reigns of Henry VIII. or
Edward VI. The shape of the shields, moreover, is too
late for the date described by the author in the pamphlet,
and for a royal bedstead, the heraldry displayed is remark-
ably poor; also it is a trifle difficult to understand why
the achievements of Llewelyn Eurdorchog, Ithyl Felyn,
Llowden, and Cynric Efell, not one of which, by Mr. Tim-
brell's own showing, was a direct ancestor of Henry VII.,
should be accorded such prominent positions. The
"spill-like ornament'' described is a very ordinary form
of moulding, and has no connection with the "nigged
staff" badge of the Nevilles. It is rather unfortunate,
too, that comparison should be cited with the bedstead
of Henry VIII. shown in the illuminated psalter in the
British Museum, as this is distinctly Italian in origin and
in no way comparable to the carved posts at Broughton.
At all events, Mr. Timbrell's pamphlet, with its illus-
trations and genealogical trees, makes interesting reading,
and is admirable inasmuch as it assists in maintaining
the interest of " kernoozing. " Only 150 copies of the
treatise, reprinted from the Transactions of the Histoti
Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, 191 4, have been
produced for sale, and these may be obtained from the
THE interesting study of old English lire-marks has
emboldened Mr. Harrold E. Gillingham, of Philadelphia,
to publish a monograph upon those
issued by the insurance companies of
America. The first plate known to
have been used in the United States
was that of the "Philadelphia Con-
tributionship," sometimes known as
the "Hand-in-Hand" of Philadelphia, which appeared in
1752, and represented four hands clasping each other at
the wrists, cast in lead, and fastened on a shield-shaped
wooden board. Two interesting plates, both of which
bear representations of old fire engines, were those issued
respectively by "The Fireman's Insurance Company of
Baltimore" (organised in 1826, and retired from business
in 1904, "burnt out by the great Baltimore conflagra-
tion"), and "The Penn Fire Insurance Company of
Pittsburgh," which was incorporated in 1841, and "wiped
out by the big fire in Pittsburgh," 1845. Reference is
made to the obelisk on the site of old "Fire-proof House"
on Putney Common, which formed the subject of an
illustrated note by W. F. Maynard in The Con-
noisseur for February, 191 4. This building was
considered to be rendered immune from the devouring
element by the introduction of metal plates between
the floors.
"American Fire
marks," by
Harrold E.
Gillingham,
Philadelphia
THE catalogue of Mr. William Ward 2. Church Ter-
race, Richmond), the well-known specialist in Turner
engravings, contains many items of in-
A 1 urner terest to the collector. Several original
drawings by Turner are enumerated,
including The View on the Moselle, a fine and perfectly-
preserved specimen of the artist's "Rivers of France"
period. The engravings after him comprise almost the
complete series, beginning with the subjects engraved
for such eighteenth-century publications as The Itinerant
and The Pocket Magazine, and ending up with plates
executed after his death. The separate impressions from
the Liber Studiorum, many of them in duplicate, and not
a few of them in rare states, include practically all the
subjects engraved, and other works are as adequately
represented, while there are a number of original draw-
ing, and sketches bv John Ruskin.
We have to go back one hundred and twenty-two years
to find a Royal Academy exhibition opened under similar
conditions to those now prevailing.
The Royal There have been great wars since, but
Academy
First Notice
the conflict with France, commenced in
1793 with the revolutionary government
in power, and finished in 18 15 with the final fall of the
Empire, was the last world-war in which England took
a part. In May, 1793, as m May, 191 5, England was in
the opening throes of a struggle with the greatest ot
continental powers. Belgium had been overrun by the
enemy, who was doing his utmost to destroy our trade
and crush us out of existence as a nation. The odds against
us were greater. The nation was not so united : we had
no powerful colonies to give us assistance ; and our
population was relatively much smaller. Vet the cata-
logue of the Royal Academy for 1793 shows that the
country faced its peril without quailing, and did not so
much as allow the consciousness of it to disturb it from
the production and patronage of art. The exhibition was
larger than that of the previous year — 856 items against
780. Judging by the large number of portraits included,
commissions were flowing in as freely as during ordinary
times. Hoppner, it is true, in the sulks at not yet having
been elected an associate, was represented by only a
single example. But Lawrence and Shee with eight each,
and Russell the pastellist with twelve, show that there
was no lack of patronage. The tone of the exhibition
was not especially war-like. West, the president, had
two battle pictures, besides several of more peaceful
scenes, but their subjects were taken from the reign of
Edward III. Copley, an even more successful battle
painter, was illustrating Spenser'-, Faerie Queen. Serre .
the marine painter, had a single picture of a naval en
ment — not belonging to the war in which we were then
engaged — and half a dozen of e peaceful themes. De
Loutherbourg and Gillray, both of whom were unrepre-
sented, were the most war-like of the artists, for at the
tunc they were actually at the front in the Netherlands
engaged in making sketches.
( )ne has described the Academy of 1793 >n order to
show that art at the time was not profoundly affected b\
the incidence of the great war. Many of the critics appear
to have thought that the present conflict would have
already resulted in the evolution of a new style of art.
and more especially of a new form of battle picture.
This, of course, has not been the ease. The struggle in
the end will probably leave its effects on the art of the
period, but its influence will be only apparent in the work
of the younger generation of artists, and in all probability
will only show itself indirectly. The great upheaval of
the French Revolution left English art in very much the
same condition that it found it. One hesitates to set
down to it even the evolution in landscape which was
brought about by the genius of Constable and Turner.
Their work was rather a corollary of what had gone before
than a distinct breaking away from old traditions. And
so, too, with the present upheaval. The painters who
have gone to the front may bring back a vi\ id impression
of the realities of war, but it is unlikely that they will be
able to represent it on canvas any differently to what has
already been done. Verestchagin has pictured its horrors
with as much realism as art permits ; to go beyond him
and yet be convincing" would necessitate the services of
the photographer rather than of the painter. We may
expect art to share in the purification which the country
is undergoing by passing through the refining fire of trial
and sorrow. It will be inspired b\ the same traditions
as before, but will be greater because marked by more
nobility of purpose and • oi utterance.
As a whole the Academ; under the description
of an average exhibition. Important works are fewei
than usual, and the walls are less crowded. Yet, if am
thing, there is an improvement in the general standard.
I here is, as usual, an undue preponderance of portraits,
though some of the latter are amon 1 I works in
the exhibition. Tho e ol Fohn \faddocks, Esq., J.P., by
Mr. II. II. La Thangue, R.A., and Joseph Shaw, Esq.,
K.C., by Solomon |. Solomon, K.A., followed more
or less on conventional lines. Both are good without
pecially interesting. The latter failing cam
alleged against Mr. John S. presentment of
/•'. //. Jenkinson, Esq., Librarian /<• tin- Unh'ers
ridge, for whether his work repels or attra
always succeeds in arousing the spectator's attention.
One would fancy thai Mr. Sargenl has somewhat
fixed the 1 omph ■■ on ol I litter to picto 1 ncies,
is its pallor appears unnatural! The end
in this instance justifies the mean., foi though limited
almo t to ni. mo. In al 1 t lh<
1 :r 1
The Connoisseur
most striking of tin- artist's long series of great portraits.
Mr. Sargent is indisputably a master of portraiture, for
in this metier his realism and lack of romantic feeling
never offend. With other themes this is not always the
case : a notable instance is in his wonderfully painted
landscape entitled Master and I'' it pi Is. In this there is
shown a beautiful woodland glade such as fairies might
delight to haunt, the stones and greenery in the fore-
ground, patched with sunlight, and the darker fir trees
behind, combining to form a natural beauty-spot. Mr.
Sargent has chosen to set in the midst of it a group of
amateurs with easels and other paraphernalia, which at
once vulgarises the whole scene. He has a fondness
for this sort of thing, which is to be regretted. As our
most brilliant painter of nature, it is to be hoped that
lie will cease to regard it as a background for groups
of artistic tourists. Before leaving the subject of Mr.
Sargent's work, one may congratulate him on it being-
carried forward to a greater degree of completion than
usual. Often his pictures are presented in the guise of
brilliant sketches. This year, while his brushwork is
no less fluent, his sense of colour and sunlight no less
vivid, he has fully recorded his impressions instead of
leaving them as half-expressed suggestions.
Going back to portraiture, one may note Mr. Harold
Speed's dignified presentment of Sir Frederick T.
Edridge and Mr. H. J. Draper's posthumous likeness
of Tlie late Lieut.-Gen. Sir //" E. Franklyn. It is to
be regretted that Mr. Frank Dicksee, R.A., appears
to have permanently joined the ranks of the portrait
painters. He still retains much of his old pictorial
manner, and in his fondness for rich draperies and acces-
sories reveals his earlier training as a genre painter.
His Mrs. Pretyman - Newman, painted in his usual
highly finished manner, makes an attractive picture,
and the same may be said of his portraits of Miss Ethel
Dicksee and Mrs. James Simpson. Of these the portrait
of Miss Dicksee is perhaps the most completely satisfy-
ing ; gracefully posed and marked by refined yet rich
colour, it gives a pleasing and individual rendering of
the sitter. Another artist who also devotes much at-
tention to the environment of his sitters is Mr. Arthur
Hacker, R.A. His portrait of Miss Elaine Barron is
a well-composed colour arrangement, in which blue,
white, and old gold formed the leading notes. In both
this and his portrait of Miss Darley the artist had at-
tained great purity in his flesh-tones. Mr. J. J. Shannon,
R.A., appeals more especially by the painter-like
qualities of his pictures. His brushwork is broad,
fluent, and always significant. These characteristics
were shown in both his portraits of Mrs. Usher and
Mrs. Phipps. Of these the former was a little un-
sympathetic in its rendering ; but either picture ranked
among the best in the exhibition. It is to be hoped
that Mr. Orpen, like so many artists who have shown
high capabilities for other forms of art, will not become
wholly absorbed in portraiture. His three examples
are all in this metier, and, good as they are, they do not
wholly reconcile one to such a limitation of his powers.
The trio are distinguished bv the use in each case of a
plain black background. This is a practice not to be
indiscriminately followed, for it is apt to lessen the
interest of a picture and make the figure stand out from its
surroundings like a piece of cut-out paper. Mr. Orpen,
however, has imparted quality and atmosphere to his
blacks, and the figures appear to merge in them rather
than protrude obtrusively forward. The Miss Lily Car-
stairs, somewhat thinly painted, was a delightful expression
of delicate colour, and the Marchioness of Headfort, rather
stronger in its tone, was even more delightful.
Turning aside from the portraits, Mr. Arnesby Broun\
Church is overmuch of a sketch for an Academy exhi-
bition, which is supposed to be limited to finished pictures.
His Rain Cloud is vigorous and adequate, but best of all
is his large canvas of The Hide Marshes, representing a
group of cattle standing in a wide, open field under a
storm-laden sky. One might urge that this shows little
variation to former works of the artist ; that it presents
an artistic problem for solution which he has already
successfully solved. Such criticism, however, would not
be sound, for, as Constable and many of the older masters
have proved, it does not signify how often an artist essays
similar themes so long as he can bring to each the same
inspiration and freshness of feeling. This Mr. Arnesby
Brown has done. The Wide Marshes is the most simple
of the series, the broadest and most convincing. The
Shadow and Shower, Aberfoyle, shows Mr. David Murray
back among his Scotch themes. It is a realisation of wet,
silvery sunshine lighting up a bracken - covered brae,
tender in tone and marked by reticence and refinement
of colour. His Day in October, Venice, is full of bright
colour without being garish, while his /// a Studio gives
a very characteristic portrait of the artist engaged in
work. Mr. Fred Appleyard's Secret, a mystical picture
showing a child in an old abbey garden imparting some
confidence to her mother, with angels on either side the
pair, is aggravating because over-enigmatical. The figures
and their surroundings are very well painted, but there
does not appear any adequate reason for the presence of
the celestial visitors. Another supernatural being is shown
in Mr. Cadogan Cowper's large picture entitled Faust
first sees Margaret, in which Mephistopheles — a little in
front of Faust — forms a sinister figure at the door of the
church from which Margaret is emerging. The artist
has clothed her in over-gorgeous apparel for a peasant
girl, but he has rendered her prim but conscious attitude
with much truth. The figure of Mephistopheles is also
good, but that of Faust hardly answers to one's concep-
tion of the aged and learned doctor, endowed again with
the vigour and passions of youth, the type chosen being
not sufficiently intellectual or refined. As a whole, the
picture is a little disappointing. The background appears
to dwarf the figures, and though the scarlet garments of
Faust and his companion afford a welcome note of relief,
the general coloration of the picture is uninteresting. .Mr.
Joseph Farquharson's diploma picture, When Snow the
Pasture Sheets, shows him in his typical vein. Though
mannered, it shows much delicate observation. Sir Ernest
A. Waterlow, R.A., is also among the snows again. His
On the Wengern Alp: Winter and other Swiss scenes
PORTRAIT OF J. M. W, Tl RNER, R.A.
BY EDMUND WILD MAN, JUNIOR
Current Art Notes
utilise in a pleasant and effective manner the contrasts
afforded by masses of snow variegated with dark masses
of trees and backed by blue skies. Mr. Mark Fisher's
( 'ision of the Sea shows his usual atmospheric quality and
unaffected sincerity of observation ; while Mr. Adrian
Stokes, A.R.A., in his Reeds of Lake Leman, gives another
of his delicate colour-harmonies, poetical in conception
and tender in tone. A Flower, by Mr. Harold Knight,
shows a well-painted figure of a girl standing in the full
light of a sun-flooded window. The interest of a picture
of this character, however, depends much on its sincerity
of treatment. Mr. Knight has to some degree sacrificed
truth for effect, otherwise one would think that the face
of the girl, instead of being partly in shadow, would be
fully illuminated. Mr. Edgar Bundy, A.R.A., justifies
his election to the ranks of the associates by the painter-
like qualities of his Merry Monarch. The work is a
repetition on a larger scale of his drawing recently shown
at the Royal Institute. Good as is the general conception,
colour, and brushwork of this picture, its effect is marred
by a certain element of vulgarity in the treatment of the
minor figures, who are all represented as laughing with
the boisterousness of country plough-boys. Charles the
Second's court may have been merry, but his courtiers
did not lack dignity in their outward bearing, and it may
be surmised that wits of the type of Buckingham and
Rochester would give vent to their mirth in a less exuber-
ant manner.
Sir \V. B. Richmond, in The Tree of Knowledge, gives
a new version of the temptation, Eve being represented
seated on a high bough of the tree with the serpent twined
about it beguiling her. The treatment is dignified, and
the colour-scheme, in which blue predominates, well sus-
tained. Mr. Charles Sims, A. R.A., strays on the classical
borderland, his nymphs belonging more to the realms
of faerie than to orthodox mythology. All his works are
replete with dainty fancy, though in some instances the
suggestion is over-elusive. Perhaps the most satisfying
of his works is The Pastoral, with its troop of naked urchins
presided over by a stalwart and graceful maiden return-
ing from the harvest-field.
From the golden age of Mr. Sims one is brought back
to the stern realities of the present time by the numerous
pictures which deal either allegorically or otherwise with
the war. Mr. George Clausen, R.A., is among those who
treat in the allegorical spirit. His Renaissam e shows the
spirit of Hope standing amidst the shattered ruins of a
city, the crocuses — the flower of spring — springing up
about her feet. Behind her are a man and woman
extended prone on the ground, and a French savant with
bowed head sitting on a heap of stones. The List figure
is somewhat incongruous. His orthodox, black, modi I n
garments appeal nut of place in an allegory in which all
the other figures are treated conventionally, and this
hesitation between the ideal and the realistic is apparent
in other portions of the work. It is, nevertheless, a tine
work — finer,however,in isolated passages than as a whole.
Altogether realistic is Mr. haven's canvas, Wounded,
London Hospital, igi 5. The scene is depicted without
any exaggerated pathos or false sentiment The long
perspective of a large, well-lighted ward is shown with
its rows of beds filled with wounded. A young High-
lander, seated on a chair in the foreground, is having
arm dressed by a nurse. The scene is tranquil, almost
commonplace in its orderliness, but yet its tragic aspect
is suggested, though not over-emphasised, by the still
recumbent figures of many of the patients too ill to heed
what is going on around them. As a work of art the
picture takes high rank by the way in which the artist has
surmounted the technical difficulties of his theme. The
complicated perspective is managed in masterly fashion,
and by the arrangement of the lighting and figures the
long series of parallel lines are variegated and broken up
without the effect of space being destroyed.
Of battle-scenes there are many. Taking those dealing
with current affairs first, one may open with Mr. W. L.
Wyllie's representation of the " Carminia ng the
"Cap Trafalgar." In the actual conflict it maybe surmised
that the enemy's ship would have been less distinctly visible.
A more effective picture by the same artist is Bringing in
the Wounded 'Lion,'' in which the damaged battle cruiser,
with a heavy list to one side, is shown entering the Forth,
escorted by an attendant squadron of destroyers. It
is well arranged, and gives an impression of actuality.
Mr. Norman Wilkinson deals with the conflict in which
the Lion was damaged by painting The Sinking of the
"Bluecher." This work, though inevitably recalling the
well-known photograph of the event, invests it with a
more graphic interest. Of scenes on land, Mr. II
Van Ruith shows us the state of Ypres ( athedral offer the
Bombardment, which is interesting as being perhaps the
last picture of the ancient building before its entire
demolition. Mr. W. W. Hawkesley's picture of the line
of helpless women and children sent forward to make
Germany's Battle Front is impressive in a melodramatic
manner. The huge canvas of Mr. Herbert A. ( diver,
entitled Where Belgium greeted Britain, depicts the
meeting of King George and the King of the Belgians
"at the frontier post on the road from Dunkirk to Fumes.
December 4, 1914." It is a straightforward statement of
a historic event, absolutely uninfluenced by the ima
tion, and would have been far more effective if executed
on a smaller scale. Mr. F. Roe's Somewhere at the Front,
showing a party of Tommies in a dug out. is a piece
of good painting, in which the lighting is very happily
managed and the brushwork broad and vigorous. There
is a certain amount of sentimental interest in the scene,
but it is not unduly emphasised. His /-'ester Parent,
showing an English soldier watching over the cot of a
sleeping child, is also well painted, but in this the senti-
ment is a little too obvious. Mr. |. 1'. Beadle's Comrades
reveals a party of English and French soldiers fighting
side by side against the advancing foe. The incident
111. iv not have actually happened, but the artist has brought
it well within the bounds of probability by showing the
troops in what is not an orthodox treni h. but merely .11.
extemporised line of defence thrown up during the actual
fighting. The scene isdepii ted with some graphic power,
and happily symbol radi p "t Our OW n
and the French arm
The Connoisseur
\ i ii 11 i [ 156 the Augustinian order erei ted a monastery
at Bekenton, us it was then spelt, which is situated on
the Bath Road, three miles from Frome.
Beckington. , , , , .... . ,
... B About H47 the building was converted
Abbey , ■ , ,, 1
into an ecclesiastical college, where
Thomas Beckington, Bishop of Bath and Wells, Am-
bassador to France prior to the espousals of Henry VI.
and Margaret of Anjou, was educated and entered holy
orders. In the reign of Henry VII. the abbey passed
from the custody of the Church into the hands of laymen,
who were at work for several generations altering the
building to serve as a secular dwelling. The present
house retains several of its old monastic features, whilst
the later portions contain some splendid Jacobean over-
mantels and plaster ceilings, one of the latter being
decorated with Tudor roses, fleur-de-lys, and the pome-
granates of Catherine of Arragon. Most of the domestic
details are Jacobean, but there is also an "Adam"
room. The dining-room fireplace is a typical Tudor
specimen, whilst on the exterior of- the building there
is a verandah constructed from remains of the ancient
cloisters. This interesting property is now in the hands
of Messrs. Harrods Ltd., Brompton Road, who hold
full particulars.
beautiful iridiscent quality. An additional charm to
these pieces is that no two are alike, it being impossible
to duplicate the exact tones of colour.
Wedgwood
WE regret that, owing to an inadvertence, the firm 01
Messrs. Wedgwood & Co., Ltd., of Tunstall, were not
given their full style in a paragraph which
appeared in a recent number of THE
CONNOISSEUR, but were alluded toas Messrs. Wedgwood
and their productions described as "Wedgwood ware."
As the firm of Messrs. Josiah Wedgwood & Sons, Ltd.,
of Etruria, have used the title of "Wedgwood ware"
for their productions since 1759, and the name is secured
to them by letters patent, this description should be
corrected, as being an infringement of their rights and
likely to lead to confusion between the two companies.
To the popular mind the term "Wedgwood" more par-
ticularly applies to the blue and white Jasper ware, which
formed a unique feature in eighteenth-century ceramic
art, and is still extensively made. The term, however, is
equally applicable to the other productions of the firm, of
which the Queen's ware, pierced ware, and black basalt
are perhaps the best known. Two beautiful novelties
which have been lately issued by Messrs. Josiah Wedg-
wood .K: Sons, Ltd., are reproductions of Chinese "powder
blue" and lustre china. In the former the deep yet
transparent tones of vibrating blue, which givesuch charm
to the Chinese examples, are wonderfully realised. The
blue, as in the K'ang-hi originals, forms a groundwork on
which conventional designs in gold are daintily patterned.
The lustre china, which also derives its origin from
Chinese inspiration, shows a wonderful variety of colora-
tion, the tones varying from malachite to deep orange
and from peacock blue to mother-of-pearl, each colour
being transfused with a golden sheen and having a
An Apology
We hereby acknowledge that we have described ware
manufactured by Wedgwood & Co., Ltd., of Tunstall,
Staffs., as "Wedgwood" ware, this trade
mark being the sole property of fosiah
Wedgwood & Sons, Ltd., of Etruria, Stoke-on-Trent,
Staffs., and we hereby apologise for the infringement
committed.
WE have to announce, with great regret, the resignation
of Miss Wade, principal and manager of the Royal
„ „ . , . School of Art Needlework. For forty
Koyal School or ... ,,. , ,, ,
. ' -T ,, , years Miss Wade gave all her ener-
Art Needlework . , , B . ,
gies, and the greater part of her life, to
the interests and welfare of the school, and it is due to
her untiring devotion that it has become the well-known
authority that it is. Miss Wade not only has had the
absolute confidence and regard of H.R. H. the President
and the committee, but has also earned the affectionate
devotion of the staff and workers by her unfailing
kindness and interest in their welfare. We feel sure
that all who know the school will join in hoping that
Miss Wade's health will soon be restored by the rest
we regret to learn she so sadly needs. H.R. H. the
President lias appointed Miss Evelyn Bradshaw, who
for some time has been vice-principal, as successor to
Miss Wade.
THE place where some antique treasure or curiosity
is discovered has always a fascination for the collector.
Every time he handles his "find," or
Antiques in the , . . , . , .
^ shows it to his friends, some pleasing
West Country . ., . . ,
memories or striking incidents con-
nected with its purchase will return to him. Indeed,
it is this fascination, added to the unique pleasure of
possessing the treasure itself, which makes the collector's
home so intensely interesting. Devonshire is an ideal
place for the explorer in search of the antique ; besides
its glorious scenery, it is rich in places of historic
interest, and at the present time — blissful thought ! — it is
far removed from the scene of Zeppelin raids and from
the fear of German bombs. In no part of this lovely
county are more authentic relics of the past or choicer
works of art to be found than at the firm of Messrs. J.
Ellett Lake & Son, in the city of Exeter. Here are fine
examples of Stuart silver, rare miniatures, ancient jewels.
choice specimens of old china, and curios of many
kinds. Situated almost under the shadow of the grand
old cathedral, this time-honoured house has been the
resort of the curio - lover and antiquarian since 1833.
Far and wide extends the firm's reputation for good
taste and sound judgment in their purchases, while their
old-world courtesy is quite proverbial.
126
The Connoisseur
VALUATION AND
CORRESPONDENCE DEPARTMENT
Special Notice
Enquiries should be made upon the coupon which will be found in the advertisement pages. While,
owing to our increased correspondence and the fact that The Connoisseur is printed a month before
publication, it is impossible for us to guarantee in every case a prompt reply in these columns, an
immediate reply will be sent by post to all readers who desire it, upon payment of a nominal fee. Expert
opinions and valuations can be supplied when objects are sent to our offices for inspection, and, where
necessary, arrangements can be made for an expert to examine single objects and collections in the country
and give advice, the fee in all cases to be arranged beforehand. Objects sent to us may be insured whilst
they are in our possession, at a moderate cost. All communications and goods should be addressed to the
"Manager of Enquiry Dept., The Connoisseur, 35-39, Maddox Street, W."
ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS
"Books.
Le Charivari, 1842.— A9,29I (Norwich). — The works you
mention are appreciating in value, but at present are worth only
a few shillings.
Bible, imprinted by Robert Barker, London, 1605.
— A9,366 (Bromley-by-Bow). — Judging from your description,
the Bible is not in the best of condition, and therefore would be
unlikely to exceed 30s. in value at most.
Engravings.
"Coursing-," by Reeve, after Wolstenholme, 1807.
— .A.9,259 (Boston Spa). — It is, of course, quite impossible to
attach a definite value to your prints without an inspection, but
a really fine genuine set of four plates in colour would be worth
approximately £40 or ^50.
Portrait of Nelson.— A9, 338 (London, S.W.). — It is a
trifle hard to identify the coloured mezzotint you speak of, but
if you could let us see the original, we should probably lie able
to assist you in the matter.
Miscellaneous.
Queen Anne Bureau. — A9, 309 (Lincoln).— The sample
of veneer which you enclose appears in be burr. walnut. If you
could send us a photograph of the bureau, w <■ should be able to
supply you with an approximate valuation, which we are unable
to do from the description alone.
Silver Loving Cup.— A9, 334 (York).— Judging from the
rubbing of marks sent to us, your loving cup is of Newcastle
manufacture, period 1S07. Without seeing the original, and
going by the diagram alone, we should estimate the value a!
being between £5 5s. and £6 6
Book on Pewter.— A9, 338 (London, S.W.).- lor a good
book showing pewter marks, we should recommend you to
Markham's Pewter Mark ami Old Pewter Ware, published
by Messrs. Reeves & Turner, 1909. Clock. — We regret
that we have been unable to trace the maker of your clock
in any of the usual channels of information. If you sent us
a photograph, together with a full description, we should be
able to procure an approximate valuation of the piece.
"Paintings.
Portrait of Marshall FitzJames of Berwick.—
Ag,257 (Paris). — Judging from the photograph sent to us,
portrait of FitzJames of Berwick appears to be of some inter-
est. If you wish to discover the artist or any other particulars,
we should recommend that it be reproduced in our NOTES VND
QUERIES pages, at the usual charge of 10s. 6d. to cover cost of
preparing a block.
Portrait of a Lady.- Ao. 333 Chester). We regret that
the two small photographs sent to us do not permit of our
forming anything like an accurate idea of the portrait, which is
in the style of the Kneller period, but may possibly be a copy
made at a later date. So far as we can judge, the work does
not seem to be of any artistic importance, whilst the draughts-
manship is very poor. It is impossible to appraise a value from
the data in hand.
Unidentified Paintings. — A9,335 (London, W.).—
Owners of unidentified paintings of all descriptions should have
them reproduced in our NOTES ami QUERIES section, which
has proved an excellent medium for ail purposes connected
with the tracing, locating, or ascription of works of art of all
descriptions.
"Pottery and Porcelain.
Vases. — A9.278 (Tunbridge Wells).— Judging from the
photograph, your vases are modern imitations of rare examples
from the Sevres factory, ami consequently, from a collector's
point of view, they would be valueless, but as ornament!
might realise from 25s. to 30s. the pair. Plaque. — The
plaque, of which you send a photograph, is possibly Wedgv,
but we should require to see the original in order to 1
\r. .
Silver Lustre Teapot, etc. — An,;i 1 I \. ham 1
value of the silvei lustre teapot in q : about 30s.,
as also would the basalt specimen. The oilier object referred to
cannot be valued unless we see a photograph.
Sunderland Lustre-Ware Jug. .\9.3\s (Barcelona).
— As your Sunderland jug is imperfect, il wi
little interest or value to a collector.
'-'7
HE CONNOISSEVP^
GENEALOGICAL AND
DIC DEPARJMENT
Special Notice
Readers of The Connoisseur who desire to take advantage of the opportunities offered herein should
address all letters on the subject to the Manager of the Heraldic Department, Hanover Buildings, 35-39,
Maddox Street, W.
Only replies that may be considered to be of general interest will be published in these columns. Those
of a directly personal character, or in cases where the applicant may prefer a private answer, will be dealt
with by post.
Readers who desire to have pedigrees traced, the accuracy of armorial bearings enquired into, or other-
wise to make use of the department, will be charged fees according to the amount of work involved.
Particulars will be supplied on application.
When asking information respecting genealogy or heraldry, it is desirable that the fullest details, so far
as they may be already known to the applicant, should be set forth.
Judd. — Sir Andrew Judde, knt., Alderman of London, was
a skinner by trade. He was alderman of Farringdon Without
and Bridge Wards, was sheriff in 1544 and mayor 15 50-1.
His will was proved in the Court of Hustings in 155S-9, of
which the following is an abstract : — To be buried in the parish
church of St. Helen, near Busshopesgate, near Agnes, my late
wife. To Dame Mary judde, my wife, in satisfaction of
jointure or dower, my manors of Essnetisforde, otherwise Assh-
ford, and Esture, co. Kent, and Bardon, co. Herts, also my
messuages 7c in the town, parish, and fields of Batons, co.
Surrey, to hold same for life, with remainders to John and
Richard, his sons in tail. Also to son John, lands and tenements
in Spenshurste and Spellyurste, co. Kent, known by the name
of " Coddes," certain others in Bydborough, co. Kent, and the
manor of Down, co. Kent. To the Master and Wardens of the
Fraternity of Corpus Christi of the Craft or Mistery of Skynners
of the City of London, the close of pasture called " Sandehilles,"
on the backside of Holborn, in the parish of St. Pancras, co.
Middlx., being of the value of ^13 6s. 8d. ; a messuage in the
" olde Swanne Alley" in Thomas Street, in the parish of
St. Laurence Pultney, divers messuages in the parishes of All
Hallows in Graces Street; St. Mary Axe; St. Peter in Corn-
hill, and an annuity of ^10 issuing from a tenement called "the
Bell" in Graces Street aforesaid, to hold the same in trust for
the maintenance of a free grammar school at Tonbridge, co.
Kent, lately erected and founded by the testator, paying to the
schoolmaster £20 and to the usher £S yearly, and charged wdth
the payment of eighteen pence weekly to each of six poor alms-
men living in the almshouses within the close of St. Helen's
aforesaid, and with the distribution of coals yearly to the same
to the value of £\ 5s. 4d. The overplus, after payment of all
charges, expenses of keeping the premises in repair, &c, is to
be to the use and behoof of the said company, to order and
dispose at their wills and pleasures. This will is dated
2 September, 1558.
Lavender. — The arms of this family are : — Per fess. gu. and
arg. , a pale counterchanged, and three fountains ppr. Crest : —
A demi-horse salient arg., gorged with a chaplet of lavender
ppr. These arms were confirmed and the crest granted 7 May,
1628, to Nathaniel Lavender, of London, son of Elias Lavender,
son of William Lavender, of Standon, co. Herts.
Walter. — On 20 March, 1 57 1 , the following arms were
confirmed to Henry Walter, of Stepney, co. Middlx., gent. : —
I. Arg. guttee de sang and two swords in saltire gu., oppressed
by a lion ramp. sa. for Walter. II. Arg. a chev. betw. three
sickles gu. Crest : — A heron ppr., putting its beak into a whelk
shell or ; mantled gu., doubled arg. The following descent is
also given : —
John Walter, of =
Crawden,
or Croydon,
co. Cambridge.
I
Thomas \\ alter
Elizabeth, daughter of
Richard Pinchpoole.
I
Roger \\ alter
I
I
>hn Walter, of
Btoxborne,
co. Herts.
1
Henry Walter,
son and heir.
Purt. — Richardson Purt was son of Mark Purt, of Finborough,
co. Suffolk, clerk. Matriculated at Trinity College, Oxford,
16 June, 1742, aged 19. In the same year a Robert Purt, clerk,
took his B.A. at King's College, Cambridge, and his M.A.,
four years later. He is probably identical with Robert Purt,
who received- a dispensation to hold two livings in 1749, the
livings in question being the rectories of Settrington and
Dennington, co. York.
Registered for transmission to Canada at Magazine Post Rates. Printed by Bemrose & Sons Ltd., 4 Snow Hill, London, E.C., and
Derby, and published by the Proprietors, Otto Ltd., at HANOVER BUILDINGS, 35 to 39 MADDOX STREET, LONDON, W., England.
Subscriptions— Inland 1 6/-, Foreign 1 7/-, to Canada 1 4/., per annum. Published the 1st of each month. Published by Gordon & Gotch,
in Australia and New Zealand; by The Central News Agency, in South Africa; by Higginbotham & Co., in Bombay and Calcutta; and
by The International News Co., in U.S.A.
*4
*«■■:
LiSrfi
*
n
*
>
^
L i
k
July, 1915.
The Davenham Collection English Eighteenth=Century
Caricaturists — Thomas Rowlandson By Selwyn Brinton
The collection formed by Mr. Dyson Perrins
at Davenham, beneath the shadow of the Malvern
Hills, is particularly rich in the prints and drawings
of those two giants in English caricature of the
eighteenth century — Thomas Rowlandson and James
Gillray. Both these artists received careful and —
for the period and information available — adequate
treatment during the past century by Thomas Wright
in his Life of Gillray, and by Joseph Grego in his
Rowlandson the Caricaturist. The two authors just
THE WOOLPACK AT HONGERFORD, BERKS.
Vol.. XLII. -No. 167. G
ORIGINAJ DRAWING, SIGNED ROWLANDSON, 1 7>l'>
I31
The Connoisseur
VIEW OF OXFORD CASTLE
FROM AN' ENGRAVING PUBLISHED 1S09
mentioned must have lived in the records of the
eighteenth century and saturated themselves in its
sti iry. Mr. Grego mentions " the late Thomas Wright,
F.S.A.," in a very friendly manner in the third page
of his own work ; and perhaps it is no flight of fancy
to imagine these two students sometimes spending an
evening together, and entirely forgetting their own
epoch in the memoirs of a far more congenial past.
On the other hand. Grego's work needs revision in
some parts, as much as that of his predecessor; and
here the Davenham collection — which contains more
than a thousand prints by Gillray, and which includes
also (a point of some interest) the actual table at
which James Gillray worked, which passed later into
the hands of George Cruikshank — is even superior in
its collection of Thomas Rowlandson's prints, which
number very considerably more than the thousand,
besides containing a number of the artist's original
drawings, to which I shall later direct the reader's
most special attention.
The two artists were contemporary, living both in
the very richest period of British art and political life.
Gillray's dates we have seen to lie between 1757 and
1815, with from 1782 to 1810 as his period of great-
est productive power. Thomas Rowlandson was born
one year earlier, in July of 1756, and outlived his
greatest rival by many years, for he published his
Dr. Syntax in 1809, and only died in 1827. He
was possessed of artistic talents which deserved a
better field than even that one which he made for
himself in caricature; and, as I have suggested else-
where, might — had he but willed it — have attained to
the highest eminence in art creation. "His work,"
I said, when speaking, in my English Caricaturists of
the Eighteenth Century, of the Royal Academy Exhi-
bition of 1775, "must have shown considerable power
to be hung beside the canvases of Reynolds, Romney,
and Hoppner " ; but already, in 1784, the more facile
field of caricature had begun to attract him, and in
the vortex of political excitement caused by the
famous Westminster Election he found an inspiration
and a ready market with the publishers.
The period of 1791 and the years immediately
succeeding seem to me of peculiar interest in Row-
landson's brilliant creations, and this special period
is very richly represented in the Davenham collection.
His line is richer, more free, more living at this
moment of his life ; his sense of the beauty of women
more sensitive, more inspired. Take his women in
The Inn Yard on Fire (aquatint, 1791), in Damp
Sheets (Aug. 1st, 1791), Housebreakers (Aug. 1st, 1791),
and in English Barracks and French Barracks (same
J3:
133
Tlie Connoisseur
year of date i :
dressed o n 1 y,
in the three
first-named, in
night -eap and
night- dress,
the) have not
the superbly
physical beauty
which i s t o
be noted in
some of Gill-
ray's carica-
tures, but are
softer, more
feminine, and
infinitely more
alluring. To
the same year
belong the re-
markable prints
(f r o m the
Davenham col-
lection, like all
those noted
above) of Tht-
Dead Alive, in
two part s,
which seem to
have been over-
looked by Mr.
Grego.
But this man,
with a sense of
beauty as sensitive sometimes as that of Romney him-
self, was a born humorist, who knew, perhaps, better
than we can hope to do his own powers and limitations.
He cannot help himself, and the humorous side seems
often to run over into his plate almost without his
willing it; there is innate in him "that element of
caricature which " (as The Connoisseur remarked
very truly in a recent issue, speaking of his print of
Tlie Mint) "strays frequently into his work intended
wholly to be serious." There was no reason, for
instance, why his View of Oxford Castle (see illustra-
tion) in this collection should not have remained as
simply a charming scene of landscape and riverside
architecture : but he must introduce the episode of
the dog swimming after the ducks, and the figures in
the windows, by the river and in the street, are all alive
with the fun of the chase and scuffle.
Many, and in fact the most of his social prints, are
pure, unadulterated humour, in which he abandons
himself to the funny side of the situation with an
1'HE BEAR AND THE BEAR LEADER
enjoyment as
spontaneous as
that of his
audience. The
Mad Bull 011
Westminster
Bridge is abso-
lutely crowded
with figures
and incident,
which centres
in the bull
himself, in im-
minent proxim-
ity to a running
old gentleman,
and pursued
in his own
turn b y a n
excited crowd.
The same side
of his art ap-
pears in the
Cart A'aee and
Careless A I ten-
lion, wb ere a
gouty old
gentleman is
furiously pull-
ing the bell,
while the wait-
ing-maid, enter-
ing at the door
;iNAL DRAWING, SIGNED ROWLANDSON, 1776 ^^ ernDracecl
surreptitiously by the military, upsets the tea-tray with
its contents, and the kettle boils gaily over the gouty
foot of her exasperated employer; and yet again in
the inimitable humour and canine psychology of a
Mad Dog in a Coffee House.
What the Mrs. Fitzherbert scandal was to James
Gillray, that was the Mrs. Clarke parliamentary episode
to Thomas Rowlandson. He " let himself go " ; he
fairly revelled in it ; and the series of prints on the
subject in the Davenham collection attest his ingenuity
and close attention. The Duke of York — "George
the Third's darling son, the favourite Frederick "-
had been criticised very freely as to his administration
of the Army ; and on January 27th of 1809, Colonel
Wardle charged the duke with corrupt administration
of the Half-Pay Fund, whose control lay with the
commander-in-chiet.
"Colonel Wardle," says Mr. Grego, "stated he-
should prove that the Duke of York had a mistress
—Mrs. Clarke — living in great splendour in Gloucester
SH^tti-azi.
'34
•
IB
135
The Connoisseur
Place from
1803 to 1806.
The lady had a
list of prices for
the sale of com-
missions, and
her patronage,
it was stated,
extended also
to ecclesiastics.
He moved for
a Coram ittee
of the whole
House to in-
vestigate the
subject . . .
and on Febru-
ary 1 st Mrs.
Clarke stood
at the bar of
the House, a
1 lively Thais,
e m i 11 e n 1 1 y
self- possessed,
a r m e d wit h
ready wit, anil
w i t h char m s
of person and
address which
dazzled the
gravest mem-
bers."
She certainly
seems to have
h a d the best
of it in this
exa mi nation,
keeping her
h e a d , a n d
turning the questions, which were intended to annoy
or degrade her publicly, against the 1 Hike of York,
who seems to have at this time withdrawn his "pro-
tection," promising a payment of ^400 a year, which
had got badly into arrears.
Rowlandson did not improve the already uncom-
fortable position by a series of merciless caricatures
under the titles of Days of Prosperity in Gloucester
Place ; A Parliamentary Toast : The Resignation, or,
John Bull overwhelmed with Grief (he exclaims : "Oh,
dunna go, dunna go ! It'll break my heart to part
with ye: you are such a desperate moral character"!:
The Road to Preferment through Clarke Passage :
Dissolution of Partners///'/', or. The Notorious Mrs.
Clarke ; and A General Discharge, or, The Darling
UNMARRIED
Angel's final
S hot . T h e
whole series
was published
b y T h o m a s
Tegg on March
17th, 1809,
with the title,
1 ( 'omplete
Collection '.of
( 'aricati/res re-
lating to Mrs.
Clarke : and,
h o w e v e r t h e
cari cat ur i st
may have rid-
dled the " Dar-
ling Angel's"
moral charac-
t e r . h e w a s
more merciful
to her person,
for she appears
in these prints
as what she al-
most certainly
was, an e x-
tremely pretty
and attractive
woman.
I turn now
to the original
studies by
Thomas Row-
landson in the
Davenh a m
collection, be-
cause the V
present to us
features of especial interest. Drawn, as it would
seem, with a quill pen — from the wonderful richness
and freedom of the line — and tinted with a delicate
wash of colour, they bring us very close both to his
methods and his direct creation. I noted among
them more especially a charming scene of English
Countryside, in colour : Modern Antiques : The Return
from Gretna Green (see illustration), also in colour,
where the kneeling daughter holds her angry parent's
hand ; The Symptoms of Sanctity, which shows a fat
monk beside a very pretty penitent : .-/ Doleful Dis-
aster, or. Miss Tubby Tetarmin's Wig on Fire; The
Woolpack at Hungerford (see illustration), another of
this artist's inimitable English landscapes ; The Bear
and the Bear Leader (1776) (see illustration), a clever
BY THOMAS ROWLAND
The Davenliam Collection
MARRIED BV rHOMAS
satire of a boy and his tutor, which I am not aware
of having seen reproduced as a print ; .1 I /.
like the others in colour-wash, with the outlines indi-
cated with the pen : and, lastly, a pencil study for
the print called Wit's last Stake, showing the famous
Duchess of Devonshire sitting on Charles James Fox S
Ri iu I VND 0
knee, with a cobbler mending her shoe, one of the well
known sen. . ol the Westminster I V • tion. Several
of these drawings are engraved, and one sometimes
finds that the delicati colour of the original has
suffered very materially in the reproduction.
Before turning to the pole 1 would
The Connoisseur
mention some
delightful
prims in this
collection
deali ng with
countrylifi and
fo x-hunti ng.
The series of
three prints,
doing nut in
the Morning,
Win J s o r
Fo res t , Fox
Chase, and an-
other country
scene, fi ne
though they
are. seem to me
surpassed by a
similar series of
the date I 786,
with the titles,
Going out in
t he Mom i ng
1 N o v e m b e r
28th, 1 786),
The ChaSt (see
illustration)
(March, 1787),
and Death of
the Fox (Nov-
ember, 1 786),
of which The
Chose, i n its
treatment of the pack in full cry in the middle distance,
is one of the finest hunting scenes I have ever
come across by any artist of any period. These
are large prints, and would be admirably adapted
for framing.
Critically speaking, I think we may safely decide
that while both treated political and social subjects
indiscriminately, Gillray's real strength lay in political
and Rowlandson's in social satire. The latter artist's
laugh is more easy, his pencil generally less mordant
in its satire, though he scourges with equal energy
both Fox and his great opponent in his cartoons
of The Times, Tone// on the Times, Word-Eating
(attacking here Fox), A Sweating for Opposition,
The Rochester Address, State Butchers, and The Pitt
Fall (1789).
But on the whole, what we enjoy in Rowlandson is
the other side of his art — Englishmen in November,
W*t*.r&Qlbim /9o~6<
I'HE RETCRN FROM GRETNA GREEN ORIGINAL DRAWING, SIGNED ROWLANDSON,
cursing their
fate writh the
national ten-
dencyto spleen ;
French me n in
No v e in /< e r .
with all the in-
souciance and
gaiety of the
'ancien regime' :
The Mis, nes
of Human Life,
Being suddenly
seized with a
ft of e ramp,
and that in the
first grade of
the honeymoon,
where the poor
husband is
writhing in
agony, and his
pretty young
wife, in night-
gown and the
mob-cap Row-
landson so
loved to de-
pict, regards
h i m with an-
xiety and sym-
pathy : and the
whole series of
his satires upon
matrimony (taking still the collection which is here
before our study) : A White Sergeant giving the word
of command; A Smoking House and a Scolding Wife;
Comforts of Matrimony — beside the fire, with the
husband toasting, and children all over the floor ;
and Miseries of Wedlock, where the angry partners
are breaking the furniture upon each other, a point
of view which reaches its climax in A Stag at Toy,
where the unfortunate man is trying to defend himself
with any object at hand from the furious onset of
an excited virago.
Rowlandson's view of matrimony was, like his view
of life, essentially human : he records, perhaps, in his
inimitable drawings, the " transitory impressions of
the hour," but he records them truly. They witness
to the human life of his time, and, indeed, of all time ;
and therefore they have an unfailing, a perennial
attraction, and a lasting value.
1S06
ANNE HYDE, DUCHESS OF YORK
BY SIR PETER LELY
In the collection of Earl Spencer, K.G., lit Althorp
Old English Chatelaines
English chatelaines date further back than
the Norman Conquest, for metal hooks, to which were
attached tweezers, tooth and car picks, keys, etc., have
been found in the graves of Anglo-Saxon women. In
the Middle Ages these necessary objects were hung
at the girdle, and at the Renaissance dangled from
the hangers of the belt. Towards the end of the
sixteenth century, however, the belt with long ends
went out of fashion, and a kind of chatelaine came
into vogue. The list of presents received by Queen
Elizabeth in the twenty-ninth year of her reign re-
cords "a device to hang keys at of golde," while
continental pattern-books of about this date include
designs for scissorcases, etc., which probably hung
from these "pendants de clefs."
Some years ago there was exhibited at the Victoria
and Albert Museum a chatelaine and watch said to
have been given to Anne Boleyn by Francis 1.
(No. i.). While watches were first made' in the
early years of the century, and were- probably used
by Anne Boleyn, this one at all events dates from
the seventeenth century. The component parts
of the chatelaine are, however, of good Tudor work-
manship, even if they did not originally form a
chatelaine. The watch, indeed, was usually worn
as a pendant, as it is in the " Krascr - Tytlcr "
portrait of Mary Queen of Scots, in the National
Portrait Gallery (No. ii.). In tin seventeenth cen-
tury it was generally hung by a ribbon from the
bodice or girdle. Tin- scent-case, howevei
" . . . That bob of g<>l<l
Which a pomander fall doth hold"
By Joan Evans
is mentioned by Evelyn as hanging from a " French
crochet." He also alludes to the chatelaine —
". . . To which a bunch of onyxes
And many a golden seal there dangles."
At the beginning of the eighteenth century the
"equipage'' was in vogue — that portentous chate-
laine which Lady Mary Wbrtley Montagu describes
m her Fourth Town Eclogue. It was usually made
of chased gilt metal : from the central medallion
hung a toothpick, and eases lor thimble, scissors,
pens, knives, etc., all decorated en suite. At the
same time the simpler and smaller chatelaine was
almost universally worn, and formed a popular
wedding present. It usually consists of a shield-
shaped hooked medallion, from which two chains
descend, linked by plaques, from the last of which
hangs the watch. In addition, there are some-
times two or more free' chains to hold the watch-
key and seal.
Chatelaines are an especially interesting form of
jewellery to collect, in that they were the province
of the metal-worker rather than the gem-setter, the
bijoutier rather than the joaillier, and very fine
chasing and enamelling is found on examples, such
as that made by Thuilst in 1705 lor Queen Anne
(now in the l'it/william Museum), or the beautiful
chatelaine and wan h of whiti -veim >1 agati encrusted
with diamonds and rubies, and set in engraved gold,
made by John Rich about 17.10, in the Pierpont
Morgan 1 ollei tion. Pinchbei k, the patent invention
of Christopher Pinchbei k. a watchmaker and toyman
of fleet Street, was frequently used, and as much
I II
The Connoisseur
care was taken with the design and chasing as if it
was of precious metal.
The watch and the medallions of the chatelaine
were usually chased with figures in the classical style
within a rococo border, while the small linking
medallions are frequently pierced.
A little after the middle of the century very fine
chatelaines were made by the firm of Perigal and
others, decorated in painted enamel with classical
heads and figure subjects in grisaille (Nos. iii. and
iv.). About 1770 a kind of chatelaine was introduced
which dispensed with a hook, and terminated instead
in a hanging medallion and tassels (No. v.). This
type is often decorated with translucent enamel in
one colour, generally a pinkish purple or a royal
blue, the chains and tassels being of linked pearls
wium
&*(&&&
No. II. — PENDANT WATCH, FROM
" FRASER-TYTLER " PORTRAIT OF
MARY QUEEN OK mot-.
NO. I.— CHATELAINE AMI WATCH,
SAID TO HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO
ANNE BOLEYN BY FRANCIS I.
No. III. — CHATELAINE
BY PERIGAL
142
Old English Chatelaines
or tubular chain. It is characteristic of the time
that the medallion is often treated as a memorial
locket and filled with hair. This hookless type of
of great difficulty and prohibitive expense, good
pinchbeck and steel examples are occasionally to be
found. Amateurs should be on their guard against
Nl >. IV. i HA i ii aim-:
BY PERIGAL
NO. VI. CHATE] VINE "I
WR0UGH1 STEEL
NO. V. CHATELAINE WITH
MEDAL] [ON AND I ISSEI.S
chatelaine (which was worn passed through the
waistband, with the watch .mil tassels both dangling)
is also found made "l cut steel, with Wedgwood
medallions. Wrought - steel jewellery, for which
Boulton and Watts, of Birmingham, were famed in
the late eighteenth century, is also represented by
such chatelaines as that represented in No. vi. Thi
cist steel is sunn what brittle, and this, like many
examples, has a link broken.
While a collection of really fine examples of
chatelaines in ^old ami enamel would In .1 matter
Hindi in reproductions— those made up from Dutch
chased silver book - clasps (which are h
enough and rarely pretend to be genuine) -and
should also remember that a certain numbei ol
chatelaines in eighteenth - century style were
about the middle of the nineteenth century. 1
in jewelled enamel are at first sight attractive, but
ii,, 11 inferiority ol design and execution is apparent
on closer study.
The fob is distinct from the chatelaine and the
" equipage " in that it supports the watch and seals
i 13
The Connoisseur
alone. While the chatelaine and the fob were worn
by both sexes, the former was usually worn by
women and the latter by men, perhaps on account
and usually contained a pincushion, mirror, minia-
ture, perpetual calendar, or vinaigrette. It was
generally made to match the real watch in material
NO. VII. — FILIGREE WATCH-
CASE OF GILT .METAL
No. VIII. — WATCH-CASE OF
SHAC.REF.N STUDDED WITH MARCASITES
NO. IX. — FOB-RING WITH
BEZEL IN THE FORM OF A KEY
of its greater simplicity. It was nearly always formed
of black ribbon threaded through metal slides. The
delicate watch - case was usually protected by an
outer case, sometimes formed of metal or of filigree
(No. vii. ), and sometimes of painted horn or sha-
green studded with gold or marcasites (No. viii.).
Sometimes two fobs were worn, one supporting the
real watch and the other a dummy watch, or fausse
montre. This sometimes had an imitation dial-plate,
and workmanship, but occasionally makeshift fausses
montres are met with formed of brocade stretched
over a metal foundation to give the effect of
enamel. Handsome seals usually hung from the
other end of the fob, but were occasionally displaced
by a fob-ring — a large ring of ornate workmanship,
having a ring for suspension at the back. Occasion-
ally the bezel is cut as a seal, or is in the form of
a watch-key (No. ix.).
144
Miscellaneous
!R^4U
"Georgian Mansions in Ireland"'
By Ronald Clowes
One of the most encouraging features of
Irish life of recent years has been the great revival of
interest in national art and archaeology. Time was,
and not so long ago, when the intellect of the country
appeared almost wholly absorbed in politics ; the
memorials of the past were neglected, and little or
nothing was done to continue artistic and literary
tradition. This condition of affairs is now altogether
altered. Irish art and literature are showing a vitality
and freshness of outlook not to be surpassed by those
of any other quarter of the British Isles, and the
beautiful relics of their former prosperity are being
described and recorded by painstaking chroniclers.
The Georgian Society of Dublin has done yeoman
service in the latter work. The four earlier volumes
issued under its auspices gave a complete survey of
the interesting eighteenth-century buildings surviving
in Dublin, while the fifth and concluding one (kali
— but dealt only very partially — with the remainder
of the country. The committee of the society had
caused tours of inspection to be made in every
county, and nearly three hundred houses were ex-
amined ; but owing to want of space, only twelve of
these were fully described and illustrated, a list In ing
given of the remainder, briefly noting their character-
istics. The exhaustive treatment of the twelve favoured
mansions was so well carried out that it made tin
nadir wish that the remainder could be similarly
dealt with. To a certain extent this desire has been
gratified by the issue of the volume ol Georgian
Mansions in Inland, by Messrs. Thomas \\ . Sadleir
and Page I.. Dickinson, whose labours so materially
contributed to tin- success ot the volumes issued by
the Georgian Society. The present work must b
regarded as a supplement to the latter. The book is
ol the same size and appearance, though its scope
has been extended by the inclusion of objects ol
interest outside architecture. Owing to this welcome
innovation, pictures, plate, and furniture, including
many objects of interest which had either been lost
sight of or the existence of which was practically un-
known, are recorded, and in some cases illustrated.
One, however, could wish that this might have been
done in a more complete manner. In many of the
seventeen mansions visited, only the architectural
features have been recorded; and while in others a
fairly complete list of the important works of art is
given, the authors generally content themselves with
a bare mention of the subjects and artists : in some
instances even these scanty particulars are only par-
tially set forth. These omissions, however, must nut
be too severely condemned. Probably the idea ol
extending the scope of the book to pictures and
objects of art only [(resented itself alter tin actual
survey of the mansions concerned had been i
eluded, and consequently then extra architectural
contents were not recorded with the particularity
which would otherwise have been the case.
rhe mansions visited have not all received equal
treatment. To Abbeyleix, the Seat Ol Viscount de
\ i Si i, only three illustrations an given, the ah
of the owner at the Anglo-German war having pre-
vented additional pi rapbs from being made. rh<
house appears tohavi been largely modernised, tho
.... ,.;;/ Man i n in Ireland, by Thomas YV. Sai
M V. M.R.I. A., and Page I.. Dickinson. (Dublin University
Pri ; limited to 700 copies at £ 1 10s.)
MS
The Connoisseur
PORTRAIT OF THE HON. EDWARD WARD AT CASTLE WARD
much interesting decoration in the Adam style has
survived in the interior apartments. The pictures
recorded include a few works of special interest. A
portrait of Le Grand Dauphin, by Pierre Mignard,
is fully worthy of the full-page illustration accorded
to it. There is also a fine portrait of Nicholas tic
146
BY GEORGE ROMNEY
Launay, by Hyacinth Rigaud, and two portraits by
that now famous artist, Gilbert Stuart, whom Ameri-
cans seemed disposed to regard as the father of their
school of painting. The artists of the majority of the
early family portraits do not appear to have been
identified — a regrettable omission, as in collections
z
z
3
_
3
The Connoisseur
like this much valuable information is to be gleaned
concerning the minor lights of eighteenth - century
portrait painting.
Beaulieu, which dates back to 1665, retains an older
appearance than most of the large Irish mansions,
for, unlike them, it docs not appear to have been
remodelled in the eighteenth or nineteenth century.
It is described as belonging to the "Caroline " period,
which, one might surmise, is an overlooked misprint
for Carolinian. Its internal adornments have been
more modified, but still retain many seventeenth and
early eighteenth-century features. The only picture
which is mentioned is one of the several portraits
by Reynolds of the Primate Robinson. In Bess-
borough, a large Georgian mansion, the pictures
recorded are far more numerous, mention being
made of portraits by Romney, Reynolds, Cotes,
Copley, Hoppner, and other well-known artists. The
main body of Caledon also belongs to the Georgian
period, though much of it verges on the extreme
limits, and there have been substantial additions of
a still later date. Its interior presents many fine
examples of the Adam style of decoration, which
appears to have attained an even greater vogue in
Ireland than the sister island. Perhaps it is best
illustrated at Curraghmore, where the principal draw-
ing-room and the dining-room are singularly complete
examples of the style at its best, walls, panelling, and
ceiling being all ornamented in it. The illustration
of the Curraghmore dining-room (reproduced) gives
a good idea of the beauty of the work. The panels
on the walls are decorated in monochrome by
De Gree, an artist who was also responsible for
similar panels in the drawing-rooms. Some semi-
circular panel compartments in the larger of the two
drawing-rooms are said to have been painted by
Zucci, the husband of Angelica Kauffman. Furness
and Heywood also contain good work of the Adam
style. Curious to say, the only house in which one
of the Adam brothers is stated to have been per-
sonally concerned is Castle Upton, the exterior of
which presents none of the characteristics of their
typical manner. The main block of this castellated
mansion dates from 161 1, when it was erected so
as to incorporate a still earlier building. Robert
Adam was employed in its renovation, and in all his
outward additions adhered to the original style of
architecture. In a mausoleum he erected in the
adjoining churchyard in 1783, he followed his usual
bent for classicalism, and the edifice, though now
somewhat neglected, is well worthy of illustration as
a good example of his typical manner.
One must not, however, give undue preponderance
to the examples of the Adam period, as other styles,
both Georgian and of earlier date, are also well
exemplified. Castle Ward has the peculiar distinction
of having "one front of pure classic architecture and
the other of Gothic," the interior of the house also
exemplifying both styles. Florence Court, perhaps
the finest mid-Georgian mansion to be found in
Ulster, is noteworthy not only for its fine exterior, but
also for containing "a wonderful display of elaborate
yet graceful plaster, rococo in style, though by no
means identical with the Dublin work of the period."
The illustrations of the beautiful ceilings and panels
which exemplify this lend confirmation to the sug-
gestion that it was probably executed by " plasterers
specially imported from France." Platten Hall con-
tains a noble hall and staircase, and several fine
apartments belonging to the earlier Georgian period.
Turvey, while chiefly illustrating the same period,
retains many Jacobean features. What the hand of
the restorer has spared of the original Archbishop's
Palace at Cashel is also early Georgian ; while in
Desart Court — noteworthy for possessing two hand-
some grand staircases, situated at either end of the
house — the general style is somewhat later.
Turning from the mansions to their contents, one
finds many objects of interest mentioned, and not a
few illustrated. At Heywood there is a fine silver
punch-bowl, made in London by Anthony Nelme,
and bearing the hall-mark of 1700, which is said to
have been used by the notorious Hell-Fire Club ; and
the well-known portrait of John Musters, by Rey-
nolds. Caledon contains several important works by
old continental masters, as well as numerous family
portraits and full-lengths of George III. and Queen
Charlotte by Sir Thomas Lawrence, which were pre-
sented by the king to the second earl. It is interest-
ing to note, that though the commissions for these
two pictures were noted in Sir Walter Armstrong's
recent life of the artist, their present whereabouts
148
'•Georgian Mansions in Ire/and"
PORTRAIT OF SIR FRANCIS BLAKE DELAVAL AT CURRAGHMORE ■ I OSH REYNOL1 P.R.A.
mentioned in connection with its line Adam di
tions. Here are several important work > nolds,
including the full-length of Sir Frai Delaval,
painted 1 7 5 7-S. and portraits -1 < laptain 1 >< laval and
Rhoda Delaval, LadyAstley; Marcus, Lord le I
was apparently unknown. At Florence Court, of a
number of objects of interest a fine lacquer screen
with tapestry panels is selected for illustration ;
but perhaps the mansion with the most interesting
contents is Curraghmore, which has already been
1 49
The Connoisseur
SCREEN IN DINING-ROOM \l FLORENCE COUR1
1 iy ( iainsborough, and some of the artist's pastels ;
and works by Lawrence, Nathaniel Hone, and Down-
man, as well as by some of the foreign old masters,
headed by Rubens.
The enumeration of the important pictures in
other of the mansions would take too much space.
Mention, however, may be made of the portraits of
the Hon. Edward Ward and his wife, Lady Arabella,
by Romney, at Castle Ward, and the portrait of
the Primate Robinson, by Reynolds, at Beaulieu.
Altogether well over a hundred pictures are noted by
about half that number of artists. This phase of the
compilers' work is one of great importance, and its
inclusion adds greatly to the interest of the volume.
It is to be hoped that the latter may form the first
of a long series, for a complete account of the chiel
country mansions of Ireland and their contents would
be a most valuable addition to our national literature
LA PETITE FILLE AU CHIEN
FROM THE ENGRAVING BY LOUIS MARIN
Chinese
Art
Objects of Chinese Art, at the
By Egan Mew
Were evidence needed, the present exhibition
would plainly show that collectors in England have
unusually swift in adapting their taste and skill
to the rapid increase of knowledge which has been
vouchsafed to us during the last twenty years in
i :gard to early Chinese art. For my part, so loosely
general or so nobly catholic — as you will — is my taste
that I can enjoy the work of this vast and complicated
land from, say, the most original object of the H^ia
dynasty (more than 2,000 years B.C.) even unto the
Burlington Fine Arts Club
cleverest copies made in the technically gifted |
of Ch'ien - lung, and right down to 1820 of Chia-
ching. Doubtless such a liberality ■ annot
be defended ; in any cim-, the passion of the connois-
seurs of the Burlington I'm- Arts Club is for tin
mysterious periods of ages ago. when Chinese art was
pure and utterly unexpectant of any defiling Western
influences.
Thus a visit to 17. Savile Row — and one is inclined
to go again and again — is a sort of magic transference
NO. I- \ BUDDHIS1 PRIEST. I VRVED \M> LACQUERED WOOD. MING DYNASTY, 8j IN. No 2. IN EM
ENTHRONED. I \l;\ r I > IVORY, FORMER! i PAINTED ; THE I \KI I. I HELD I1EFORE HIM IS i MING DYNASTY,
S,1, in. NO | Kl W-ll, WAR-GOD, SEATED ON \ rHRO E. i VRVED AND ' WOOD, MING
DYN IS'l V. Sj IN. \l I I I.N I BY MR. I. |.
'53
The Connoisseur
fro m the awfu I
world of to-day to
a semi - mythical
realm represented
by beautiful things
rather than vile
and unwise men.
If one's taste be
for the rare and
purest forms of
Chinese art, per-
haps the most
interesting ex-
ample among the
many hundreds of
fin e specimens
will be the blaek
and dark grey
jade recumbent
horse sent by Mr.
O. C. Raphael.
Our once welcome
guest, Dr. Sven
Hedin, has spoken
<>t a village known
to his travels as
" The Boulder of
Black Jade," and
it is thought by
the present owner
of the horse — 10 inches in length and i>\ inches in
height — that this may be the actual piece of metal
which gave its name to the place, for the history of
jade does not tell of the discovery of any other such
boulder. In
the catalogue
of the present
exhibition it is
mentioned that
the white jade-
dragon - horse,
shown close
by, and the
buffalo, of mot-
tled green jade,
on an adjacent
pedestal, all
stood, until
fifteen years
ago, in a corri-
d o r of the
palace of Pe-
king. The buf-
falo and horse
WHIIEJADE DRAGON-HORSE (LUNG-MA)
MOTTLED GREEN JADK RECUMBENT BUFFALO A BOULDER OF EXCEPTIONAL
SIZE PERHAPS OF THE SIXTH CENTURV A.D. LENGTH, l6 IN.: WIDTH,
II IN. ; HEIGHT, 6i IN. LENT BY MR. O. C. RAPHAEL
were brought to
Peking when that
city was made tin-
capital of China
early in the Ming
dynasty. It is un-
certain how old
they are. A manu-
script catalogue
that existed in the
palace stated them
to date back to
I lie Han dynasty
(206 B.C. to 220
B.C.), but the
horse is not likely
to be older than
the Sung (960 a. n.
tn 1 279 a.d.). The
buffalo belongs to
an earlier date
t h a n t h e h o r s e.
These two were
used annually in
a sacred festival.
Kang-hsi, inspect-
ing the contents
of his palace in
l h e e a r 1 y y e a r s
of his reign, was
shown these two, and inquired how it was that the
dragon-horse that brought the Books of Knowledge
from over the waves of the Ya-lu was not repre-
sented : this dragon-horse was therefore made for
the emperor,
with the Books
of Knowledge
at its side, of
the t h en fash-
ionable white
jade. S u c h
definite infor-
mat ion in re-
gard to actual
e x a m pies o I
a n t i q u e
I Ihinese art is
a great refresh-
ment in the
wilderness of
vague attribu-
tions and
doubtful dates
which must of
LENT BY MR.
154
c *
2 2
— j- >
7 „ a
: _
/ -
■i
l. - '--
r*l
-
z'. 5
:
155
The Connoisseur
TWO PANELS OF HARK BROWN LACQUER INCISED WITH COLOURED DESIGNS
K'ANG-HSI HEIGHT (EACH), 22f IN.; WIDTH, Ili IN. LENT
EARLY PART OF THE REIGN OF
BY MR. R. H. BENS! IN
necessity surround all knowledge of the earliest ex-
amples. Although many careful students of the
subject are enabled to justly say, as of Mr. Eumor-
fopoulos's bronze vase, with an inlay of scrolls of
gold, silver, and malachite, for example, that it belongs
to the Sung dynasty, other bothered authorities will
envy Mr. John Lane's simplicity of statement that his
album in colour, on silk, is of the Ming dynasty — a
fairly long one, by the way, and including very diverse
work in our fifteenth and sixteenth centuries — or Sir
Ian Hamilton's brief statement that his picture-roll of
scenes in a palace garden is "after Ch'iu Ying."
For must people the beauty and attraction of a
collection which includes bronzes, cloisonne and
champleve enamels, jade, sculpture, paintings, ivories,
and textiles of so much historical interest, will seem a
sufficient least: but the writer of the preface to the
catalogue, presumably Sir Hercules Read, is in a
somewhat apologetic mood. He fears that our col-
lectors have been somewhat laggard as compared
with the intense enthusiasm of their French and
American rivals. Of course, he knows just how far
the examples in England fall short of his ideal ; but I
must own that when one considers the pottery ami
porcelains exhibited here in 1910, and the vast
quantity of works now shown, one is forced to the
conclusion that our connoisseurs make an uncom-
monly good third in the race for the specimens of
old arts.
It would be unprofitable to take each of the finest
pieces now shown and describe them to the reader,
for there is no doubt that with collectors of early
Chinese work, those who can obtain such el'
already know their inner history and where they are,
and the extreme improbability of any analogous
specimens now drifting, by chance as it were, upon
the markets of men. Then with Chinese art there is
always the rather depressing fact that most of, may
one say, the great crafts, were perfected beyond all
hope of further development many hundreds of years
ago. The beauties of jade-carving, for example, were,
as who should say, completed in the T'ang and Sung
is6
Objects of Chinese Art
EWER IN THE FORM OF AN ANCIENT SACRIFICIAL WINE-VESSE1 (HUO)
BRONZE WITH [NLAY OF GOLD AND SILVER SUNG DYNASTY
HEIGHT, II IN. LENT BY MR. G. EUMORFOPOULOS
dynasties, more
than six centuries
past. The great
collectors of paint-
ing are not proud
of examples after
the fifteenth cen-
tury, and on e
regrets the same
standard of time
applies to many
other arts. But if
one may glance at
the conclusions of
the many accom-
plished writers of
the introductions
to the present
catalogue, it will
be found that
s o ill e at least
exquisite ex-
amples of all the
works of the
Chinese are here
gathered together.
The early bronzes are certainly splendidly repre-
sented, especially in the department of sacrifii ial
objects, which, from the very nature of their material
as well as from the devotion of the races which pro-
duced them, out-last time and record the aspirations
of long-forgotten peoples. The most ancient form ot
bronze isgenerally
held to be the
ting, usually a
round vessel on
three legs, with
ci iver decorated in
various ways, so
that when reversed
it forms a dish.
Various types ol
ting are lent by
Mr. 1 1 a r (1 1 n g-
Sm itli, M r. I . ii
morfopoulos, and
Professoi Norman
Collie, all of his-
torical inten ;1
and undoubted
beauty. Thesacri
tieial wine jars are
i, ii will repre-
sented. These
, ,,. REEN |ADE SEAL, I ED B1 ['HI l-ATI I II'RI
mi. CHARACTERS READ: " INSPECTF.D \N|. ENJOYED IN 1 III.
,,, .K>, ... , : , | mm BY MR. ". e. RAl'HAl I
tsun ai - el almost
indefinite variety
ol foi in, birds and
animals being
adapted to the
pur po 5e alter a
ion mail
i.illy known
by many mod. m
i . ipies or uses of
tin- cla ipes.
Mr. Ellice - Clark
si nils an earl}
Ming pii ce in the
form of .i duck,
with vase on its
back ami an arch-
ing handle ; ami
Colonel Douglas
Mai Eweil another
of the s a m e
dynasty, in tin
i,,: in uf a doubtful
animal, of which
the surface ol
thebodyisin
with delicate line ornament and the head ami neck
inlaid with line -old wire. These two early classes
of work are followed by a large number ol decoi
bronze objects connected with religious services, many
of which, such as the silver wine-cup of theT'ang period,
lent by Mr. G. Eumorfopoulos, are uf tin- greatest
value, historically,
jesthetically, and
archaeological ly.
Bronze is the earli-
est and one of the
best le ]ire si i
branches of ail at
Savile Row.
Enami Is, both
elo i son n e a n il
rh. i in ple\ • . an
exhibited from
i In 1 1 nr i 'i i In
Mm- il y n a st y
in modern dates.
As with in"
thearts, th
pieces show a
breadth
ami richness and
plainness whii
mi:
'57
The Connoisseur
higher technique
and sophistica-
tion. "Simplicity,
of all things," said
an eighteenth-cen-
tury writer who
knew the world,
'• is the most diffi-
cult thing to be
copied." In re-
gard to the jade
thisaphorismneed
not bother us.
The beautiful
work in the exhi-
bition, made from
various forms of
jadeite, marks dif-
ferent periods by-
showing slightly-
diverse kinds of
this lustrous,
polished metal, or
resonant stone.
Thus the accom-
plished connois-
seur can tell pretty
well whether an example originally came from Eastern
Turkestan or has been quarried in Burma. The many
uses which the Chinese courts found for jade have
enabled collectors to bring remarkable specimens
ti igether, and this department of the Chinese arts alone
is immensely rich in informing examples. Almost
all the contributors, from Her Majesty the Queen
downwards, send fine pieces.
But in this short review, which is primarily intended
to encourage all those who may chance to read it to
visit the actual works, we must hurry on, and, in re-
gard to sculpture, merely point to the extraordinary
achievements, both early and late, in this department.
KOX OF YE] LOW BRONZE, LINED WITH
DIAM., 6 IN. : HEIGHT, 2\ IN.
The finest pieces
are of the T'ang
dynasty, such as
the head of a
statue in basalt
sent by Mr. Schil-
ler ; but there are-
many later pieces
of infinite attrac-
tion.
In carved and
p a i n t e d wood
there is, amongst
other examples, a
splendid T'ang
Buddhist lion, lent
by Mr. Musgrave
1 )vne.
Paintings and
textiles are not
very elaborately
shown, but there
are beautiful ex-
amples of Ming
pictures ; and the
rugs and mats
and fine silks and
embroidered fabrics, which reach to an almost
modern date, such as some also sent by Mr. Dyne,
fulfil the lust of the eye to perfection. Most of the
lacquer, too, is of modestly recent periods, and inter-
ests us all the more on that account, because, if ever
again there should be time for collecting, it might be
possible still to find such specimens. As well as his
early ivories, Mr. Joass, for example, sends a circulai
table of gold lacquer painted with black line figures,
such as we have written of in The Connoisseur. It
is spoken of as being made for the European market
about 1S00. I think I could prove that the stand
had been so produced, but the top, of gold and blai k.
BLACK LACQUER MING DYNASTY
LENT BY MR. 0. C RAPHAEL
PAIR OF BOWLS OF PEWTER COVERED WITH GOLD LACQUER AMI SHELL INLAY, SHAPED AS CONVENTIONAL LOTUS
WITH MX PETALS PROBABLY OF THE MING DYNASTY HEIGHT, 4 \ IN. : DIAM., qi IN. PENT BY MR. k. II. BENSl >N
158
Objects of Chinese Art
was intended for
Chinese use. Of
laqut' burgautee,
to which t h i s
magazine has
also devoted an
article or two in
the past, there
are many charm-
i ng exam pies,
n o n e m ore at-
tract ive,al though
many arc earlier
perhaps, than
Mr. Clifford
Smith's table
screen of the
eighteenth cen-
tury.
But the only
real criticism of
this exhibition
BLACK AND DARK GREY JADE RECUMBENT HORSE THIS IS THE ONLY
KNOWN HISTORICAL BOULDER OK BLACK JADE LENGTH, IO IN. ; WIDTH,
45 IN. : HEIGHT, 6h IN. LENT BY MR. O. C. RAPHAEL
worth writing is
the modest ad-
vice tn go and
see it. and learn
from t h e e \-
amples some-
thing of the
subtle art which
generation after
generation has
inspired tlii
derful nation
which we call the
Chinese. As to
periods and at-
tributions, one-
must go gen 1 1 y
forward.
" 1 urgeries are
not a modern
invention," says
one of the able
rwO rs'UNG, OBJEI rS CONNEI I1H WITH HIE CEREMONIES OF IIIE WORSHIP hi IIIK l'KII\ I
■in Mil 111 I, GREY-GREEN IA1H, ITTRIBI 111' I" IIIE CHOU DYNASTY HEIGHT, 8
ON THE Kin III', " YELLOW " JADE, ILSO VTTRIB1 0 Till CHOI DYNASTY HEIGHT, 8} IN.
BOTH I IN l BY MRS. G. EUMORFI IPI 11
'59
The Connoisseur
introducers of this ex-
hibition. Of course.
that fact is well known,
hut it shoul d 1) e
especially recalled in
regard to Chi nese
work. For in this case
the very virtue of the
worship of ancestors
and the ancestorial
arts led in each more
or less well -defined
period to an immense
amount of copying
and re-copying from
whatever was then the
antique model. Fash-
ions of the moment
or the century, how-
ever, had some effect
upon those artists who
desired, for just or
unjust causes, to re-
peat the victories of
their forefathers. And
thus one of the most
interesting points in
regard to Chinese art
— a p art from its
beauty, which runs
through all periods —
is the quest of that
particular knowledge
which shall enable the collector to tell whether he is
getting the object of art of the period he desires, or
one that some later artist has seen fit to produce in
HAM. INC, PICTURE, TAl
PERIOD OF CH'lEN LUNG
the earlier manner.
There are signs, and
many of them, by
which such things shall
be known. But,
Mr. Laurence Binyon
says in regard to the
pai nt ings, of which
there i- a small but
extremely interesting
collection, " < 'Iviett
Shun - chii's .signature-
occurs on no less than
five paintings in this
exhibition, obviously
by quite different
hands, a circumstance
which il lust ra I es the
diffic ul ties beset-
ting the innocent
student."
II" such personages
still remain, the Bur-
ling t o n F i n e Arts
Club, notwithstanding
its frequent " prob-
ably Ming,'' "Sung
dynasty"!?), and so
forth, has done much
this year to lead the
lover of the beautiful
through the mazes of
that Oriental garden
of delights which the Chinese cultured, unintention-
ally, for our benefit, long ages before we had any
artistic existence.
ESTRY WOVEN ' K'l l-SSti I
LENT BY MRS. K. II. BENSON
[Some further illustrations of remarkable pieces in this exhibition
will be found in our next issue.]
1 60
OTES
bUER/£r5
[T/ie Editor invites the assistance of readers (/The Connoisseur who may be able to impart the
information required by Correspondents.}
Unidentified Painting (No. 183).
Dear Sir, — I am sending a photograph of a
picture which is painted on a panel of evident age
(old oak, I think). It measures 7^ in. by gi in. It
is very finely done. The background is dark brown,
and the man's hat is red and the feather white. The
woman's rap is white, as also is the lace of the man's
collar and cuffs. The breeches an- brownish yellow.
There is no signature, as tar a> I can tell. Do you
think you can tell me anything about this ?
Yours faithfully. W. li. Dufi ILL.
Old Sea Chl>i (No. 184).
Dear Sir, — Can you give me any assistance in
(183) UNIDENTIFIED PAINTINfi
l6l
The Connoisseur
tracing the history of a sea cbest, photograph of
which I enclose? I recently obtained the chest in
the country, but can obtain no history from the
former owner. The outside of the chest is painted,
and so possibly there may be some record. I shall
be very pleased if you can put me in the way of
obtaining any information.
Yours faithfully, Arthur E. Relph.
(i 84)
OLD SEA |CHEST
and has on the front, in an oval, a monogram in gold,
H N. On the outside of the lid is a painting, in oils,
of a naval battle, which is surrounded with dolphins
in gold. On the inside of the lid are Lord Nelson's
arms in colour, within a border of inlaid woods. The
interior of the chest is fitted with drawers and sliding
^< 1 lions, elaborately inlaid; the lining is mahogany,
and the sections slide on ebony runners. Can you
tell me if there is any record of such a chest, or if
there is any way in which the connection with Lord
Nelson can be established? The general style of
the chest would suggest its having been a presentation,
Unidentified Portrait (Xo. 185).
Dear Sir, — I have been a regular subscriber to
your magazine for a good many years, and I shall
feel much obliged if you would submit to your
readers the enclosed photograph of a portrait, said
to be by Sir Thomas Lawrence, in the hope that
it may be identified. The portrait is in my pos-
session, and I shall appreciate any comments which
you or your readers may make upon it. It is
on canvas, original, and measures 3 feet by 2 feet
3 inches.
I am, dear Sir, yours faithfully. A. S.
162
* BPtea
fitf
3
z
U3 3
5 ^
o «
X
- >
Notes and Queries
uniden1 ii iii'
Painting
(No. 1 86).
Dear Sir, — I
have purchased a
very interesting
picture, and have
been recommend-
ed to send you a
photograph of it,
to see if you could
trace the artist,
also give me an
idea of the sub-
ject. I have been
a collector of an-
tiques for some
years, and possi-
bly you will re-
in ember that I
purchased the
Bala Vase about
two years ago,
w h i c h , at t h e
time, created a
considerable
a m mi n t of in-
terest. I may
mention that the
miniature at tin
top of the picture
is a very beautiful
piece of work, and
1 think it is one
of the Dukes of
M a r lb o r o ugh.
But this is only
my i dea : 1 nun-
be quite wrung.
Vours faithfully,
William Ovvi v
Unidentified
Portrait
(No. is;
I (ear Sir, — I
should lie glad if
any of your read-
ers could advisi
me .t- i' ' ili- ,ini>t
and subject of the
portrait of which
I send photo-
graph. The length
(185) unidentified portrait
(186) unidentified paintini
165
ol the oil-painting
is 36 m. by 28 in.
On the left side is
,r 1 town and jars
oldfish; in
the left hand is
a roll of music,
■• Fall of Paris."
Vuuii truly.
1 Mr-. 1 Mar-,
A. Haw kin.
Unidentified
Portrait
(No. 1751.
Ma v. 1 915.
Dea r Sir, —
I'he photograph
ol lire unideiltili' d
portrait of a lady
in sixteenth - cen-
tury dress (No.
175) appears to
iiM to lie taken
from a painting
by Bernard Van
Orley, of the old
Flemish school, or
by a follower or
pupil of Van ( >r-
ley's. It doe
impress me as
having any con-
nection with Hol-
bein, as ih' owner
thinks. I could
not say ll it is .1
nine W 01 li
the painter-, a
ci ipy, or b) a pupil
of Van ( trley's, un-
less I could ex-
amine il - .n 'fully
in .1 good light :
but it undoul
ly has all Van
Orley 's manner
of paint i ng. ll
would be very dif-
llt, 1 think, to
identify t he lad}
portrayed in the
I'll Hill
T rusting the
The Connoisseur
owner of the picture may gather sonic further infor-
mation from my opinion,
I remain, Sir, yours faithfully,
Walter S. Green.
Unidentified Paintings (Nps. 179 and 180),
May, 1915.
Dear Sir, — In your May number, under " Un-
identified Portraits and Pictures," No. 179 is a
pii ture styled Marion, by Ponce, after Baudouin,
one of a set of four charming ovals, a print of which
I possess, and a description of it is given in French
Prints, by Ralph Neville, painted towards the end of
the eighteenth century, probably about 1780.
Yours faithfully, George Dixon.
Rembrandt's " Betrayal."
Dear Sir, — Can any of your readers tell me the
present or last-known owner of a painting by Rem-
brandt entitled The Price of the Betrayal? Is it in
a private collection or in a National Gallery? By
giving me all possible information as to its where-
abouts you will greatly oblige
Yours truly, Lilian Wilson.
(187) UNIDENTIFIED PORTRAIT
166
Cottenham, Cambs., the Ancestral Home of the
Pepys Family
Through the courtesy of a contributor to The
( ONNOISSEUR, we are enabled to print the following
account of the ancestral home of the Pepys family,
which is extracted from a MS. Journal of Wander-
ings in Search of the Picturesque between Cambridge
and Ely. As our contributor made his notes in the
ea rly eighties,
readers must
not take state-
ments to "pre-
sent time " in
a literal sensi .
"The chief
relic nl aim-
1 1 u i t y 1 ii lie
seen in < "ottcll-
ham in the old
1 L o r d s h i p
H o u s e,' a n
ami ent-look-
ing st ni ctu re
standing back
some short dis-
tance from i li-
ma i n street.
.\ connection
may In- trai i d
between this
a n d S.i m ii e 1
Pepj s, thi ci
brati d diarist.
T li e I a m i 1 y
0 f I' i p y s,
1 I'D 111 W ll 1 I ll
the benefai tor
of Magda-
lene < 'ollege is
PAIRCASl IN '"II ENH \ \I
l67
considered to haw descended, settled in Cottenham
during the early part of the sixteenth century, and
it is not at all improbable that the ' Lordship
House' was built by them. An entry in the diarj
runs thus : —
" •June 1 2 th, 1667 : . . . . I met Roger Pepys, newly
come out of the country: in discourse he told me
that his grandfather, my great-grandfather, had 800/.
pei ami u 111 in
Queene Eliza-
beth's 1 1 m e in
the \ ery town
of ( Tottenham ;
and that we
did cert. i inly
com e 11 ut ni
Scotland wi t h
the Abbol ol
C r o w land.'
This pro vi
that Sa in in' I
Pi |i\ s's ances-
had been
su ffi c iently
wealthy 1 1
stunt sinll a
h a n d s o m e
building as the
•Lordship
1 Ii luse ' once
was. Am
entry, made
J Ulle I III li ol
the imi
sa\ s . -■ I '
1 y s told
Hie. thai
I come to
Ii is him se In
will show nn- a
I.Ol D III!' IIOCSE
r.
<
Z
168
Notes
decree in Chancery, wherein there was 26 men all
housekeepers in the town of (Tottenham, in Queene
Elizabeth's time, of our name.'
"To show what the ancient magnificence of the
' Lordship House ' must have been formerly, it may
be mentioned that in consequence of some encum-
brances appertaining to the property, it was found
necessary, some few years back, to adopt direct
measures towards raising a certain amount with the
object of freeing it from them. Accordingly a largi
portion of the ancient house was pulled down, when
it was found that enough oak had been taken from
the 'Ball Room' to pay for the whole estate. I 1
interior of the portion which still exists has been
sadly modernised and altered, one room, which is
panelled from ceiling to floor, being divided into
three or four compartments, with a wooden staircase
on one side. In a room in the front of the hou
a wide fireplace, now, however, blocked up ; over this
is a very ancient piece of carving, the device of which
represents nude figuri s resembling imbecile cupids,
each one balancing itself upon one leg and supporting
the other in its hand. Passing through this room.
we come upon a fine old staircase, the balustrade ol
which is of black oak. Ascending this, we reach
various stages of uneven landings, on one of which is
a marble mantelpiece covered with numerous petri-
factions of geological moths and insects. It is a
beautiful specimen, and worthy of a close inspection.
A date is said to be carved on one of the ponderous
red-brick chimneys, and is possibly the year when the
building of the house was completed. If the reader
is particularly anxious to know what it is, he had
better find out for himself, as it can only be seen by
ascending to the roof by the aid of a ladder — a pro-
ceeding which even an ardent antiquarian mighl
possibly contemplate with some di gn ol disfavour."
Dunster Castle stands on a steep hill, where
originally there was a much older erection. Alt
[uest it fell into the hands 1 >f
Dunster Castle ^ mm&m Molllln. who pulled
down the then existing building, and laid the foui
tions of thi pn eni ■ tstle, which continued in the
possession of his descendants until Lady Elizabi i
Luttrell, nee Courtenay, purchased ii f 1 them. This
lady's son. Sir Hugh Luttrell, won a lawsuit aj
Edward Plantagenet, Duke of York, in thi eighth year
01 Henry IV., by which he obtained "the honour
and the castli of Dunster." Sir Hugh distingui
himself as a soldier in the French wars, whilst his
grandson, Sir James, was knighted at thi batl
Wakefield, and slain at the battle <>i St. A
There is some tradition that this doughty supp
of the failing House of Lancasti r was tried for and
found guilty of high treason (against the Yorkist
monarehyi after his death, and in consequence the
family estates were confiscated until the accession of
the Tudors, when Sir Hugh Luttrell, son of the
gi 'ing, came into his own. The early part of the Luttrell
pedigree forms a forcible illustration of Thomas Hard) 's
parson in the first chapter of Tess of the d'Urbervilles,
where he says to old 1 >urbeyfield. "Aye, there have
been generations of Sir Johns among you, and if
knighthood were hen like a baronetcy. .
practically was in old times, when men were knighted
from father to son, you would be Sir John now.''
The last of the Luttrells in the male line to live
at the castle was Alexander, whose only daughter,
Margaret, married Henry Fownes in 1747. when tin-
old surname was re-adopted ; and it is from this o
that the present Mr. Alexander Fownes - Luttrell
descends. Although somewhat extraneous to the
present subject, it may be observed that the manor
of East Quantoxhead, after being in the possession of
the Paganets from the Conquest until the heiress
of the line married Sir Andrew Luttrell in the reign
of Henry III., has remained in the same possession
to the present day. with the exception of the period
indicated above. It may interest some of my readi rs
to know that Edward Seymour, Lord Beauchamp
(1537-1621 1, great-great-grandson on the distaff side
of King Henry VII., married, circa 1585, Honora,
second daughter of Sir Richard Rogers, of Bryan-
stone, co. Dorset, Kt., by his wife Margaret, daughter
of Sir Andrew Luttrell, son of thai ; II h to whom
the estates wee 1 From thi marriage 1 il I
1 lui hamp sprang numerous families and branches
of families, such as the Ward-, the children of John
Harvej ["hursby, of Abington, Sir Richard Burton,
of Sacketi Hill House. St. Peter's, Isle of Thanet,
and Ins numerous descendants, including the Osborn,
Withall, Brown, and Caddy branches.
To return to Dunster Castle, thi me frag-
ments of Norman work still extant ; but a large pan of
the buildings date from the Tudor period. The old
keep was destroyed in 11150. after the castle had been
surrendered to Colonel Blake, whom we know better
famous admiral. It was the second tune that the
Parliamentarians had besieged Dunster, for on the
fust occasion they had been driven off by Royalist re-
inforcen severe struggli ["he Roundheads
had made prisoner the mother of the 1
and, «iili a ferocity which recalls rei evi nts in
Belgium, threatened to place her s. 1 a- " the
first fury " of the defender's cannon. Happily the tell
n «as frustrated by the arrival of the friendly
to l m mam Burton,
Mi
THE RED CROSS SALE AT CHRISTIE'S
( Concluded)
THE varied assortment of objets d'art contained many
pieces of interest. On the first day, Mr. G. O. Smith's
_, , ,, . ivory Flemish vase, of the school of
Objets d'Art, _. . , . '
. — r lamingo, carved m alto-relievo with
Lace, Tapestry, ° '
a frieze of amorim and a goat, iof in.
etc. ° ' 2
high, was sold for 40 gns., and of
two ivory Portuguese sixteenth-century statuettes of the
Virgin, presented by the Duke of Norfolk, the first,
17 in. high, which was exhibited at St. George's Exhi-
bition in 1886, fetched 25 gns., whilst the second, 18 in.
high, brought 52 gns. The feature of the second day
was the sale of Queen Mary's tortoiseshell fan, set with
Her Majesty's monogram in diamonds, surmounted by
a gold crown, the mount composed of feathers from an
eagle's wing, which was first knocked down for 190 gns.
to Mrs. Bowring Hanbury, but owing to her generous
wish, was again put up to auction, this time being secured
by Mr. J. B. Crichton for 140 gns. The lace section
did not come quite up to expectations as regards the
prices paid. A fine old Limerick lace dress of about six
yards round, presented by Mr. A. Blackborne, brought
26 gns., and Miss Grace M. Sykes's fine Honiton
applique flounce, 7f yards long, 20 in. deep, 20 gns.
Amongst the embroideries and fabrics, Mrs. William
Salting's Turkish prayer rug, of crimson velvet, embroi-
dered with birds and arabesques in gold thread and green
silk, 52 in. by 34 in., realised ,£15; Mr. H. Howard's
panel of seventeenth-century Flemish tapestry, with
animals in a woody landscape, go in. high by 60 in. wide,
45 gns.; and an anonymous gift of two upright panels of
Spanish tapestry, with figures of nymphs in landscapes,
and a floral border, 10 ft. 4 in. by 4 ft. 9 in., 40 gns. On
the third day of the sale, Mrs. J. Bowman's oblong silver
snuff-box, the lid chased with a battle scene, and the
sides with the rose, thistle, and shamrock, came up.
This piece was presented to Sergeant Ewart, of the Scots
Greys, for the capture of a standard at Waterloo. Two
contemporary newspapers referring to the event went with
the lot. the highest bid being 32 gns. The important
sum of 200 gns. was paid for Mrs. Zachary Merton's
Louis XV. tortoiseshell inkstand, picque with scrolls
and trellis - work in gold; whilst Mr. Pandeli Ralli's
Louis XVI. circular gold snuff-box, bearing the mark
of Henri Clavel, 1780, the lid set with an enamel plaque
of Justice and Cupid, went for 40 gns. On the fourth
day, a small bowl, of emerald green jade, mounted with
silver borders, handles, and foot, set with small diamonds,
which had been presented by H.R. H. the Princess Louise,
was knocked down for 37 gns. ; and a Russian white
jade bowl, carved with spiral fluting and with escalloped
outline, 4 in. high, 4 in. diameter, presented by H.R. H.
the Princess Victoria, emulated the incident attaching to
the Queen's fan, being first knocked down to Mr. E. M.
Hodgkins for £50, and immediately resold to Mr. Spink
for ,£31 1 os. Amongst the lacquer, an oblong gold
lacquer box, decorated with peony leaves, 10J in. by
Si in., the gift of the Japanese Ambassador, brought
,£27 6s. ; and a Japanese gold lacquer writing-box, the
lid decorated with seven sages in a bamboo grove,
their faces inlaid in silver and other metals, the interior
decorated with chrysanthemums and a stream on nashiji
ground, 9^ in. by SJ in., presented by Lord Islington,
fetched ,£28 7s. On April 21st, a pair of Japanese ivory
tusks, carved with the seven gods of contentment, sold
for 1 1 5 gns.
In order to examine the prices realised by the arms
and armour section, we have to turn back our catalogue
to the first day of the sale, when H.M.
. the King's gift brought 350 gns. It was
a wheel-lock sporting rifle, dated 1646,
made originally for Frederick William, Duke of Saxony,
Juliers, Cleves, Brandenbourg, etc. A silver escutcheon
on the side of the butt is engraved with a coat of arms,
and inscribed, " D : G : Fridericvs Wilhelmvs Dvx. Sax.
Ivli. Cliv. et Montivm, 1648.'' The barrel, 32J in. in
length, of octagonal section, is inscribed at the breech,
"Hans Rvhr • Cobvrg, 1646," whilst in front of the
170
/// the Sale Room
backsight is the monogram " H. R." A double-barrel
wheel-lock sporting gun, inscribed " Boutet a Ver-
sailles," which had been presented by Sir Charles Wei by.
was knocked down for 20 gns. ; an interesting early
twelfth-century sword, with remains of silver inlay, which
was found in the Thames about thirty years ago, and
presented by Mrs. Sayer Milward, 38 gns. : a mid-six-
teenth-century escarcelle, opening in nine compartmi
from the Zschille collection, presented by Major Sir
Edward Barry, 25 gns. ; and the Duchess of Wellington's
historical scimitar, with jade grip, inscribed on the chape
of the scabbard, " This vword was found in the Palace
of Tipoo Sultan at Seringapatam, and was tent by the
Marquess Welseley to his brother, Mr. : pre-
sents it as a testimony oj his high r,:
Matthews, Esq., under whose command lie had the hour.
and happiness to ret veat the Battle of Kilcomneyin in the
our Lord, 1798," 44 ,411-;. On April 21st, M
Victor Farquharson's closed helmet, third quarter of the
sixteenth century, realised- 45 gns. : and Mrs. I. Bal-
four Cockburn's flint-lock Highland pistol, by Thomas
Caddel, said to have belonged to the Young Pretender,
35 gns.
The sculpture did not realise any exciting sums.
Hamo Thorny. 14I in. high, entitled
Truth killing •■. was kno
Sculpture down for 22 gns . sir A,ex Hen(ierson's
gift of a bronze figure of a Piping Faun, 1 5 in. high,
by Onslow Whiting, 1903. 51 gns. ; Mr. Edmund Davis's
bronze group of Two Bears Struggling, 12 in. high, by
the late J. M. Swan. - a sixteenth-century Italian
bronze knocker, 9 in. high. modelled withHercules and two
lions, presented by Messrs. K. C. & I.. C. Davis, 42
and Sir George Donaldson's Louis XIV. bronze bust of
a faun, life-size. 46 gns. Amongst the second part of the
sculpture section, which was not a big one. Mr. II B
Burney's eighteenth-century French mat ill 27111.
high, sculptured with nymphs and fauns in relief, realised
41 gns.; and a life-size ti Otta bust of J. M \
Whistler, by Sir J. Edgar Boehm, 1875. the gift of
H.R.H. Princess Louise. 75 gns.
On the ninth day. April 22ml, the ah re inn
with the numismatical section, when Miss Lowe's Jami I
thirty-shilling gold piece, m.m. a
thistle head, a rare coin, but slightly
cracked, realised ,{ M; an anonymous
gift of a Queen Anne five-guinea gold piece, 1709, ol
the usual type, but with large letters. ,/'n : and
Cameron's carthage silvei tetradrachm oi Siculo I'uiik
fabric, circa 410 311 b.i An anonymous
donor had presented .1 Bank of England " Bank Posl
Bill " for ten pounds 1 Iron
but ni d, and tins fetched 20 gns. A note
in the catalogui this bill, which was
1847: "When sent to America foi exhibition at the
I hicago World Fail ■■ 1 0 t, and nothing was heard
! 11 more than twi rs. I In ownei meanv
notified the Hank of England of it^ loss, and requi
Coins, Medals
etc.
Relics
them to refuse payment of the bill should it ever be
presented. In 1914 the Bank of England notified the
owner that they had tidings of the bill, which was in the
hands of an American, who appears to have been a
genuine holder for value, and, after negotiation, the
original owner again obtained on of the bill.
The bill can now be presented at the Bank of England,
and would be paid at it- fai ■ {'10}; but. no ■
to say, as a curiosity, it has a value beyond this.1 And
so it proved. Amongst the medals and decorations. Miss
W. M. Maxwell's silver war medal. "Army of India,"
1799-1826, with two clasps of Aim and Maheid]
presented to Capt. G. Maxwell, Eur. Regt., was km
down at £-\: and Mrs. Lawson White's small
"Eagle badge, commemorating the battle ol Barrosa
in 1811, when the British 87th Regiment now the
Royal Irish Fusilier- capturedanea rench,
fetched 32 gns.
( in April 22nd. the ninth day oi sale, .1
historical and theatrical relics came under the hammer.
A -lass beaker, engraved with a portrait.
military trophy, and monogram " I.. B.,"
which was taken from the carriage of Joseph Buonaparte,
King of Spain, after the battle of Vittoria. lonor,
Miss Lockhart . brought 25 gns.; and Mr. Josiah New-
man's cricket-bat, personally selected by Tom Hay ward,
and bearing the autographs of sixty
70 gns. The most important lot in tin day's sale, how-
ever, was the Lord Newlands violin, bearing a label
bed " Antonius Stradiuarius Crei
Anno 1702," which had been purchased by the donor's
father from the late Mr. Laurie, who had .
from the late Mr. William Croall, of Edinburgh. When
put up to auction, the violin was secured by Lady
Wi 1 idler's agent for £2,500, but on her wish was again
exposed for sale, this time falling to Mr. Brandt for
£ 1 - 4°°-
ill the furniture which was put up to auction on
April 12th. Mr. J. W. Burton's Boulle bracket-clock,
by Cohendoz, .1 Paris. 70 in. high, was
knocked down foi 46 gns. ; Mr. J. G.
I XVI. small pa 1 with
three drawei . the to] fitted with a writing slide,
inlaid with panels of rosettes and trellis-work, anil
mounted in ormolu, 15 in. wide. 130 gns. Two other
lsisted of a Dutch nr.ir-
queterie table, with two drawers, inlaid with flowers,
I \ ind lb 1
carved with shells. an. n.wide, wh
; and a Mem; entury walnut
press. 78 in. high, 31 in. wide, carved with flowers,
52 gns. Mrs. Pickei
;6 in. wide, with three drawers. with tulip-
rmolu, and
surmounted 1>> .1 red marble slab, feti Ind | ; gns. This
had formi 4ed to the late II. U
gill, R.A. The I )u. In ,, ..t Wellington
int. h <>.ik .11 mi hair, with turned leg ti hers.
Furniture
'7'
The Connoisseur
the seat and back worked in needlework to represent the
"Fall of Phaeton," which was sold for 180 gns. This
amount was also the highest bid made for the Hon. John
Ward's ten-leaf Leath screen, Spanish, second quarter of
the eighteenth century, 7 ft. 6 in. high, painted with various
subjects. On April 21st, .m old English chiming bracket-
clock, by James Newton, Red Lyon Street, London,
fitted with musical movement, with brass dial, in pedestal-
shaped ebonised 1 ase elaborately mounted in silver,
fetched [80 gns. This charming piece had been pre-
sented by Mis, F. Manship-Ewart. An anonymous gift of
an inlaid Nonsuch chest, English, late sixteenth century,
realised 36 gns.
Autographs,
Original MSS.
ON April 26th, the eleventh day of sale, the day's
proceedings were commenced, in point of interest, by
Mr. W. Austen Leigh's gift of Jane
Austen's original autograph MS.,
consisting of twelve pages, for an un-
finished novel, The Watsons, circa 1803-4, which realised
£6--,. A little later Mr. Clement K. Shorter's relic of
Charlotte Bronte in the form of her first French exercise
book at the Pensionnat Heger, Brussels, new half calf,
4to, which had been given to the donor by Mile. Heger
in 1895, fetched jO gns. The excitement of the day
came with Mrs. Frank Gielgud's five pages of the
original autograph MS. of part of chapter 19 of the
Pickwick Papers, by Charles Dickens. The outside
wrapper is endorsed in the handwriting of the author's
father. The highest bid for this historic document was
,£450, made by Lady Wernher, who, we understand,
intends to present it to the nation. Later in the day
Mr. Rudyard Kipling's gift of a one-page draft, in
his own handwriting, of his poem, "For all we have
and are," brought .£36; and the unpublished play. The
Egoist, by George Meredith and Alfred Sutro, the
donor, with many autograph corrections and 42 original
pages by Meredith, green calf, top edges gilt, 4to, /"ioo.
Miss Girdlestone had presented Nelson's original auto-
graph log-book, 4to, whilst in the Mediterranean, from
October 24th, 1803, to August 31st, 1804, and this was
knocked down for £~%>. A catalogue note states that
" this interesting relic formerly belonged to Lady Bolton.
a niece of Lord Nelson. At her death, in 1864, it passed
to Mrs. Girdlestone, the mother of the donor." The
following lot was also a Nelson relic, an autograph letter
addressed to Sir Hercules Ross, dated from Port Royal,
Sept. 1st, 1780: — "I have just received the Admiral's
reply to my request to be sent home," writes Nelson ;
"it is granted ; the Report of the Surgeons was sufficient.
. . . I shall recover, and my dream of glory be
fulfilled; Nelson will yet be an Admiral." The highest
bid for the letter was ^52. There were several Steven-
son relics put up, but perhaps what was the most
interesting was a one-page letter, dated from Yailima,
May 27th, 1892, to Mrs. Billson (Mr. and Mrs. C. J.
Hillson were the donors of this lot), in which R. L. S.
says of her husband, " He thinks my loss of health
produced my taste for adventure, which it but impeded,
4 parts adventurer + 3 parts artist + 2 parts sensual 1,1
Books
+ 1 part Scotch clergyman." Following this interesting
letter, which reached 40 gns., came Mr. Herbert Sulli\ an's
presentation of Sir Arthur Sullivan's original MS. of the
full score of i'topia, about 318 pages, bound in half
mor , oblong folio, which was sold for 50 gns., subject to
the condition that the purchaser, who buys no copyright,
returned it to the donor for the purpose of having a copy
made.
The collection of books came under the hammer on
the last day of the sale, which occurred on April 27th.
Amongst the first items offered, Mr.
Reginald J. Smith's Poems by Currer,
Ellis, and Acton Bell, first issue of the first edition,
orig. cloth, uncut, in fine condition, with the errata slip
at the end, iv. + 1 6 5 pp., Aylott and Jones, 8. Paternoster
Row, 1846, realised ^70. This was Charlotte Bronte's
own copy, and is autographed "C. Bronte, Manchester,
Sept. 2 1 st, 1846." The late Mrs. Nicholls, the second
wife of Charlotte Bronte's husband, presented the book
to the donor. Presented by Captain the Hon. Henry
Denison, a specimen of Mrs. Kello's caligraphy, Argu-
menta in Librorum Psalmorum, Esikerce Inglis manu
exarata, from the Londesborough collection, was knocked
down for ,£40. An anonymous gift, by a lady, of Rud-
yard Kipling's Echoes, by Two Writers, in the original
paper covers, with an original unpublished poem of
28 lines, "To the Ladies of Warwick Gardens, by Rudy
and Trix," in R.K.'s autograph, and the name "Trix"
written against that author's poems in the index, Lahore,
n.d., fetched ,£90; whilst Mr. A. C. Bradley's first edition
of Meredith's Poems, with the errata slip at end, orig.
cloth, uncut, fine copy, J. W. Parker & Son, 1851,
brought £iy What is supposed to be the smallest illu-
minated MS. extant was presented by Miss M. J. Lindsay,
and fetched the comparatively low amount of 31 gns. It
was entitled Pieces Latini, a tiny little volume, neatly
written in Roman characters, on 139 pages of thin
vellum, with miniatures and initials by S. Gagliardelli,
bound in black mor., gold tooled, gilt edges, signed
and dated at Fiorenza, 1 590. A set of proof-sheets of
Underwood's (donor, Miss Boodle) inscribed in Steven-
son's autograph, "Adelaide Boodle, these sheets with
the kindest remembrances from Robert Louis Stevenson,"
dated 1887 on half-title, unbound, brought 29 gns. ;
an anonymous gift of R.L.S.'s Either Damien, original
issue, of 32 pages, with inscription, "Offered to Father
Russell by C. Baxter, 28 April, 1890," half mor., gilt
edges, Sydney, 1890, the copy sent by the author to his
friend Mr. Baxter, when he instructed him to defend
him in a libel action, 24 gns. ; and the same author's
A Child's Garden of Verses, first edition, with two of his
autograph inscriptions, orig. cloth, top edges gilt, uncut,
1885, ,£88.
Amongst the quarto volumes, Mr. Hugh Cobb's Le
Psaultier de David, avec les cantiques, beautifully bound,
with gold edges by Clovis Eve, and bearing the arms of
Marie de Medici, 1586, was knocked down for 30 gns.
Mr. 11. J. Elwes's gift of The Trees of Great Britain
and Ireland, by H. J. and Henry A. Elwes, with over
172
Ill the Sale Room
American
Art Sales
400 fine plates, 15 parts in 7 portfolios, privately printed
at Edinburgh, 1906-13, fetched 3: gns. ; whilst the
Misses Bailey's presentation of Gray's Elegy in a
Country Churchyard, a large paper copy of Van Voorst's
edition, edited by John Martin, whose own copy it is,
containing 19 of the original drawings by Constable and
others for the book, etc., mor. extra, gilt edges,
realised £70.
Till prices realised at the sale of pictures at the
American Art Galleries, when various properties were
put to auction, showed a slightly
satisfactory advance. On this occasion
the majority of the works were either b)
modern artists or else those who have not been dead
sufficiently long to render them antique. k. Landscape,
by X. V. Diaz, realised Si 55 ; Bierstadt's Sunset in the
Mountains, 8270; F. Ziem's Grand Canal, Venice, S3 10:
J. Crome's Old Bathing House, Norwich, $150; Verest-
chagin's Russian Blacksmith, Si 55 ; T. Rousseau's Land-
scape, S280 ; W. Hart's Cows Drinking, S440 ; and
Corot's Hay Cart, $600. Other prices realised were:
of the Woods, by B. Crane, S300 ; A Glorious
Sunset, by G. H. Bogert, $545 ; Portrait of Mat ie Anne
Darras, by Nattier, S150; Portrait of a Man, bj de
Tro . $360; Wi > Waves and Moonlight meet, by
Rehn, S440 ; The Granddaughter, by Millet, S300 ; The
Feudal Tower, by T. Moran, $640; A Wheatfield, by
W. M. Chase, S3 10 ; and The Shepherd's Lunch, by
G. S. Truesdall, S330.
THE Blakeslee collection of paintings was dispersed in
the Plaza ballroom on April 21st and following days,
when the following high prices were
realised -.—Portrait of aLady,byA\\ori,
Si, 400 ; Madonna and Child with St.
John, by Domenico Puligo, S3. 050; St. Mary Magdalene,
by Spagna, Si, 000 ; Susannah and the Elders, by Titian,
$1,000; The Little Shepherd, by Murillo, $1,025;
Mariana, Queen of Spain, by Velasquez, Si, 15
Charles I 1 1. of Spain, Si, 100; The feweller's Daughter,
by Lucas Cranach, $1,175 '• Portrait of a Man. holding
a pen in his hand, by de Backer, $1,025; Landscape, \iy
|uhn van Kessel, $1,625; Portrait of Marguerite ran
Bromkart, by van Mierevelt, $1,625; Amorini, by
Francois Boucher, Si. 725. Three lots following close
on one another feti hed $1,000 each. They wen- a Pot ■
trait of Madame de la Marteliere, by Jean Loui I 1
The BUkeslee
Sale
Portrait of Madame Vestris,by Madame Vigee le Brim :
and a Portrait of the Due de Penthievre, by N
Largilliere. Following the last - mentioned came F.
Guerin's Fillette jouant avec un Garcon Endormi, whii h
war, knocked down for 81,125. Shortly a
another specimen by Largilliere, Portrait of a La
the Courtof Louis XIV., brought 87,500. Other pi
were a Virgin and Child, by Van ( >rley, Si. 100 ; A Lady
of the Coningsby Family, attributed to Van Dyck. but
possibly by Sustermans, $5,100; / 'Hon of the
Magi, by Rubens, 813,000; The Wedding of Psyche, by
Sir E. Burne-Jones, 82,100; The Mackenzie Children.
by Sir John Watson Gordon, 81,025 ; and a Porti
the Earl of Portland, by Dobson, $825.
The highest sums realised during the last part of the
sale were as follows:- -Portrait of Lady Campbell, by
Hoppner, 84,200; Hampstead Heath, by Consl
1 1 : Portrait of Miss Theophilus Palmer, by Sir
|. Reynolds, 86, 100: Portrait of Mrs. Mustet
"■Hebe," by the same. $3,600; Portrait of Miss Kitty
Fischer, by the same, 82,500: Portrait oj Mrs. Drake.
by Romney, S3, goo; Portrait of the Com >. of Guild-
by Hoppner, $9,300; Portrait of Lord Crai
Sir H. Raeburn, S3. 400; Portrait of Mrs. Stuart
Richardson, by the same, $8,100; Portrait of
Melville,by Sir T. Lawrence, $5,100; Portrait 0/ the
Marquess of Hertford, by the same. $3,700; and Pot
trait of Mrs. Appleby, by Romney, 810.300. Two
famous modern subject pictures fetched $9,200 each.
They were Alma - Tadema's Sculpture Galletj
Orchardson's Young Duke. The last lot but one in
ale was Reynolds's portrait of Annabella, Lady
Blake, in the character oj ■■Juno," whii ll realised $1
Some high pn.es were iealise.1 at the American Art
Galleries when the Ives collection was dispersed. A
famille-verte Khang-hsi vase fetched
form Mmg jar,
86,100: a tall Khang-hsi vase, $6,000; a Khan;
slender vase, 83,000; a Khang hsi oviform vase, $3
and an amphora shaped famille none vase, $4,900
When the extensive library 1 ime under the hammer,
a MS. Book of Hours, of fifteenth-century French pro
duction, was soldfoi ^.1;:: afirsi edition of Pauline, by
Browning, in the original board . $1,425; a first edition
in three volumes of Robinson Crusoe, by Defoe, Si, 000;
and an early first issue of Dickens's American \
with presentation inscription from the author. $4
The Ives Sale
'75
I'm. ike most current exhibitions, the Royal Academy
hardly tails off in quality towards the end. There may
be a larger proportion of examples
The Koyal ^ members and associates in the
Aca emy ^ ^ £ tlire£ Qr fou]. r00mSj but tile
Second Notice . , ., , ,
remainder are always full of works
of merit. Generally one of the largest canvases in the
exhibition is hung on the north wall of the sixth room,
and this year the position is filled by Mr. Seymour
Lucas's Flight of the Five Members, 1642, painted for
presentation to the House of Commons. Historical
painting has never taken the same root in England as
in France, and the traditions of the art in this country
are not of the highest. Mr. Lucas follows the methods
of Ward and Armitage, whose first aim was to tell a
story clearly. He is, however, able to bring to his work
a higher standard of draughtsmanship, a better quality
of paint, and enhanced graphic power in the realisation
mi Ins conception. In this instance the grouping .if his
principal figures is achieved with pictorial and dramatic
skill, that of Strode — the central object in the picture
— dragged unwillingly to the boat by which the mem-
bers are escaping, being especially spirited as well as
thoroughly natural. It is only in the realisation of the
minor figures in the background— the supers, as it were
— that the artist has neglected to realise to the full the
dramatic force of the scene. One fancies that the
general excitement of the moment would be intense,
and would not be confined to the escaping members.
Some, at least, of their friends would escort them to
the river-side ; backward glances would be cast to see
if there was a pursuit ; swords would be held ready for
drawing to repel, if necessary, any attempted arrest
by force. Nothing of this is suggested in the picture.
A crowd, presumably of the king's followers, is lined
up about the entrance of the palace in the distance; a
few groups of men near at hand are engaged in serious
talk ; but no eye is raised to see if any pursuit is coming
or to watch the members in their flight. For all the notice
the bystanders are taking of them, they might be a party
on a pleasure trip.
Another large historical work is Mr. Frank O. Salis-
bury's Queen Philippa pleading for the lives if the
Burghers of Calais. In this the artist has utilised to
the full the opportunity for introducing rich colour and
picturesque garb, and has attained a finely decorative
effect. It may be objected that the rendering of the scene-
is somewhat theatrical, but one suspects that the actual
event was something in the nature of a prearranged
tableau ordered by the king, with the double idea of
striking terror into the hearts of the burghers of Calais
and displaying his own magnanimity. Mr. J. Walter
West s St. George of England might come within the
historical category by virtue of its title, but the artist
has viewed the scene with the eye of a landscape
painter, and the picture interests more by reason of its
fine colour and atmospheric setting rather than by the
realisation of the combat of the knight and the dragon.
So, too, with Mr. Bernard F. Cribble's Loyal M
the Bounty. The ship, floating lazily under a summer
sky on a placid sea, with the heavily laden boat in
the foreground, makes a pleasant picture with little
hint of tragedy. Yet Mr. Cribble has well character-
ised the different figures in the boat. When one
remembers the story, they fit aptly into their proper
places : but without this memory one would be well
content to accept the picture as that of an ordinary
disembarkation.
Classical or allegorical subjects do not enjoy the same
vogue as formerly — a matter of regret, for the traditional
treatment of such work imposes a higher standard of
draughtsmanship and more finished execution than
that demanded by most other subjects. Sir E. J.
Poynter's Orpheus 101th his Lute exemplified his usual
scholarly manner, but hardly ranked with his best
work. Mr. Briton Riviere pictured A Night Outpost of
Xenophoris Greeks preparing to receive the onslaught
of a couple of lions, who apparently were more afraid
of the lighted brands held by the soldiers than their
weapons or gleaming armour. The conception of the
work was good, and it was carried out with consider-
able imaginative power. Mr. Harry Watson's Allegory
of Immigration was pleasant in colour, weli drawn, and
well grouped, but hardly suggestive of a party of old-
world wanderers braving the perils of an unknown
land, which one would suppose was its intention. In
another allegory, Nature cast out. the whole treat-
ment was too realistic. The undraped figure typifying
nature appeared to be merely a woman who by some
mischance was wandering clothesless in a factory yard.
176
Current Art Notes
This incongru-
ity should not
blind one to
the really good
drawing and
careful painting
of the work.
The spirit of
industry, though
not allegorised,
was represented
in the persons of
its followers in
several works.
Mr. Lindsay
G. Macarthur's
Dighting Beans
showed a group
of rustics
perched on a
stack, in a well-
filled stackyard,
with a thrashing
engine at work.
The artist was
probably less
concerned with
the picturing of
industry than
the realisation
of sunlight and
atmosphere. In
this he had at-
tained marked
success. The
piled - up straw
stacks glowed
in the warmth
of the even-
in- light, whi< h
suffused the
dust-laden
atmosphere
with golden
haze : while the
general hot
tone of the work
was admirably
foiled and kept
in place by the
introduction of
sn in e strong
greens in the
foreground. In
the Steel Workers Mr. Stanhope Forbes showed a less
attractive but far more animated scene, lit up
by the glow of white-hot metal, which busy workers were
engaged in manipulating. The picture orously
painted, ami gave a finely realistic representation of the
scene. Among landscapes not already mentioned may
i in', via \ Li CLO IK
be noted M r.
Hall's
Oak Trees on the
edge
Collin:
what monoto-
n o us in t o n e .
but well com
in f e e 1 i n g ;
Mr. K. Gv
Goodman's im-
p res si ve b ut
heavily painted
/>',-« Nevis; Mr.
Tom Mostyn's
b r i 1 1 i a n t 1 y
coloured Gar-
den of T •
w h i ch w a s
rather < onfused
in the fo r e -
ground and
failed to be con-
V inci n g ; and
Mr. H ii g h e s
Stanton's Esk-
dale, t 'u ■
land. The last
named artist is
■ 1 with little
feeling for local
colour, and
iv h e t h e r h e
paints in Nor
m a n d y o r the
Lake District,
he sci-s nature
j much the
same aspects.
and i lollies hei
with much the
i e tints.
Allow i n |
t lie fact that
the landscape
hardly seemed
ty pica 1 of the
district it repie
:d, u was i
noble piece .if
work, well com-
edately
■
and broad i The Winter Sunlight h
il airs ot Mi. Harry W. Adams
; the Old Apple Tree of Mr. : n was
a marvel of pre-Raphaeliti on; and Mr. Frank
ier an, I blooms the whin
i sunny and pli
BY I l»l> or I HRIE
'77
The Connoisseur
compelled interest because of the delicacy and truth of
the work.
Of coast scenes Mr. Julius Olsson contributed several
in his usual vein, the best of which was The Night
Tide, in which the moonlight shimmering on the water
was effectively contrasted against the dark rocks. hi
Dutch Waters, by Mr. Moffat Lindner, was a render-
ing of white-sailed barges, with white clouds up above
and their various reflections in the water patterned out
into a strikingly decorative composition. Mr. John R.
Reid's Little Navigator reminded one of the late J. C.
Hook in its outlook, though marked by a greater zest
for strong colour. One of the largest pictures in the
exhibition was A July Day, by Mr. Gerald Moira, a
bathing scene on the southern coast. Neither the sub-
ject nor the treatment of the work seemed worthy of
the large scale on which it was presented. Some of the
figures were individually good, but the general effect was
confused, and the most satisfying part of the picture
was the background. A mellow and atmospheric tran-
script of fish-boats Home-coming into a sunny harbour
was by Mr. Robert W. Allan. Mrs. Laura Knight sent
some pictures of girls bathing. Of these, By the Sea,
showing a girl seated on a rock above the water, with
a long stretching, shimmering expanse of sea beyond,
was the most pleasing. The figure of the girl did not
appear to be in correct perspective, as, judging by the
height of the horizon, the spectator must have been
looking almost directly down upon her from a consider-
able elevation. This was hardly suggested ; but as an
accurate bird's-eye view of the figure would have been
far less pleasing, and the placid surface of the tender
grey water, streaked here and there with patches of silver
sunlight, formed a beautiful background, Mrs. Knight
may be forgiven for her artistic licence. Another figure
painter, Mr. Henry Woods, R.A., was seen at his best
in a well-composed and interesting group seen in front
of the School and Church of St. Rocco, Venice, the
whole scene being rendered in quiet and luminous
colour. Another of his works, A Chat at the Reva,
Venice, was a little gem, brilliant in tone, and at once
delicate and free in its manipulation.
Many portraits have already been noted, but their
number is so great that a second instalment of criticism
is necessary to cover omissions. The difficult task of
painting a large group is essayed not over successfully
by Mr. George Harcourt in his Arbroath Whist Club.
One would imagine that the great handicap to such a
work is that every member of a group desires that due
prominence should be given to his person. Mr. Harcourt
has apparently gratified this desire, with the result that
the picture is less a good portrait group than a group of
good portraits. In this respect Mr. John Cook is more
successful in his smaller work. In this work the eight
well-known scientists represented are focussed bv an
object of common interest, and appear posed naturally
rather than fitted into their places. Mr. George Henry's
Spring Morning, an open-air portrait group of two ladies,
is sincerely painted, with a good sense of colour and
atmospheric feeling, only marred by a lack of crispness
in the handling. R. A. Oswald, of AticMncruive, is a
good example of Mr. W. Llewellyn's smoothly finished
work ; a better, perhaps, is Sir James Mills, K.C.M.G.,
in which the well-groomed appearance of the subject
appears to happily coincide with the painter's polished
style of art. Another artist whose work is executed in a
similar style is Mr. Harold Speed, who in his dignified
posthumous portrait of The late Rt. Hon. Percy Ming-
worth takes full advantage of the opportunity which the
court dress of his subject gives him, and invests his
rendering of the lace and satin, as well as of the sitter's
physiognomy, with a certain elegant completeness which
recalls the traditions of the French eighteenth-century
masters of portraiture. Mr. Fiddes Watt's portrait of
The late Very Rev. Norman Macleod, D.D., was not less
complete in its way, but in his style, which is more
English, or rather Scotch, the method of the workman-
ship is more clearly in evidence. The work is vigorous
and vital, and shows an increased feeling for colour.
Another robust painting is Mr. G. Hall Neale's presen-
tation portrait of William H. Maw, Esq., in which the
smiling face of the sitter in no way detracts from his
intellectual attributes.
Among the sculpture the piece which has attracted
most attention is the fine Premier Martin, by M. Egide
Rombeaux, which has now been secured by private sub-
scription for the nation. There is a fine largeness of
feeling about the flowing lines of this figure, which is
aided by the broad yet adequate handling of the marble.
Mr. Hamo Thornycroft's group of Britannia with an
Indian child, which is to form part of the Sind memorial
to King Edward VII., was dignified and impressive.
The Bather, by Albert Toft, was graceful and well
modelled, but it seemed as if its high surface finish had
deprived it of some of its vitality. A Recumbent effigy of
the late Lady Lever, by Sir W. Goscombe John, R.A.,
was a successful example of monumental art, the peace
and repose of death being happily suggested. In the
Memorial Bronze of Sir W. S. Gilbert the deep relief
of the portrait bust appeared to clash with the smaller
figures at each side of the base of the monument, and the
effect would probably have been better had the artist
contented himself with executing a simple medallion of
the dramatist.
Among other works which may be noted was a Lead
figure for a garden, by Miss Ruby W. Bailey, which
was both picturesque and adequately modelled ; a group
in glazed earthenware of Children with /'nil, by Harold
and Phoebe Stabler, distinguished by higher artistic
feeling than usually characterises figures in modern
pottery. In both these materials there is much room for
good work, and it is a matter for regret that at the
present time, unlike former days, so few sculptors of
repute exercise their talents in designing ornaments for
the garden or the house. One of the best portrait busts
was that of Major-Gen. Sir Coleridge Grove, K.C.B.,
lu Mr. F. W. Pomeroy, R.A., which was vigorously
modelled and full of character; and another, though some-
what sketchil) treated, was that of James Tulloch, Esq.,
bv Mr. Alfred Drury, R.A.
178
Current Art Notes
The Inter-
national
Society of
Sculptors,
Painters, and
Gravers
THE national
rather than the
foreign element
again consti-
tuted the most
attractive fea-
ture in the
eighteenth Lon-
don exhibition
of the Inter-
national Society
attheGrosvenor
Gallery < 5 1 a.
New Bond
Street). Despite
the war, the ex-
hibition was not
much below its
usual standard,
and even the
numerous ec-
centricit ies,
w h i c h were
hardly worthy
of inclusion on
their intrinsic
merits, helped
the general ef-
fect of the exhi-
bition by afford-
ing a piquant
note of contrast
to the orthodox
works. The war
was not much in
evidence, Mr.
Walter Bayes's
August, 1014: TheBritishFleet will guarantee the Security
of the North-West Coasts of France was pre-eminently
peaceful in its aspect, a secluded spot in the sand-dunes
being shown, amidst which a woman and a child were
tranquilly enjoying themselves, ami 'inly a torpedo 1 '
destroyer in the iilvei ;ea beyond hinted at the proximity
of war. The real thing was pictured in thi erii
powerful lithographs by Mr. G. Spencei Pryse, the more
impressive because set down withoul a eration or ex-
traneous sentiment. One saw the' differed 1 bi twei n what
actually happened and what 0 1 vo d have ima ned
should have happened, besl 1 xemplifii d in the lithoj raph
showing the Third Cavalry />■■ ision in Ghent, 1
/jth, nil /. Here one would havi >upposedthi entrance
.it the British horsemen might have taken the form ol
a -run triumphant proa etwi en 1 heei ing 1
I he realitv was different. ' in the far side of thi
LITHOGRAPH BY
PORTRAIT OF 1-
ETHEL i. VB UN
one sees the line
of British troops
r i d i n g i n < i
direction, while
in the fore-
ground an end-
less crowd of
fu g i t i v e s
hurrying off in
the other. The
two streams pass
almost withoul
notici n g i
other, for war is
tun urgent a
matter for senti-
ment ; it may be
felt, but there is
no time for its
expression. A
contrast to Mr.
Pryse's ti
realism was Mr.
Algernon Tal-
mage's Mary by
the Western Sea
— realistic, in-
deed, in its
expression of
nature and its
realisat ion <>t
t e x t ur e s. b u t
wholly idyllic
in its feeling.
Pleasant real
ism, too, was
the key note of
Miss E m i 1 y
i is Morn-
ing-room Win-
.in which
the sih erj lones
u t the light-
suffused atmosphere were set off by the bright ami positive
colouring of some crisply touched in flowers. The Dancer
of Mr. i '-'.. i 1 i "an would have been b< ttei il In- had
imparted a more joyous aco i to h work. This pi
-irl. tripping lightly in a picturesque eighteenth-century
me, should havi been happy, but Mi Coates had
en hi pn lion of seriousness which almost sug-
, ed traged 1: affei ted om a .n\ unpleasant i
gruity, like ill'- introduction of a s.nl ending to blithesome
comedy. Mr. Louis Sargent, o it as regards his
. Serpentine Bay, had obtained .m almost
monumental serenity in his From ■
I in cen /ed a i mmed in 1>> ti
irk roi k. above which rosi mow covi red
acl
almost m fiat tones, the picture was singularl) in pn
Another good landscape was the Moonriseoi Mr. Edward
DWARD \ I.
■ i |OHN COPL1 Yi. AFTER ll"l I I
'7"
The Connoisseur
Chappe], an artist who is steadily acquiring a more robust
individuality. He had avoided the exaggerated con-
trast of light and shade so common on renderings of
moonlight effects, and every portion of his theme wa u I
down in its true local colour with full regard for its at-
pheric environment. Mr. Sydney Lee's Fortress — a
border tower apparently converted to residential uses — was
impressive, but rather monotonous in colour and deficient
in interest. The Descent from the Cross, by Mr. Charles
Ricketts, and A Dead Christ, by Sir Charles Holroyd,
constituted almost the only religious pictures in the
exhibition. Both painters had approached their themes
with reverence, and though neither had fully risen to the
gn atness of the occasion, their works formed a real con-
tribution to sacred art, sincere, unaffected, and devoid of
shallow sentimentalism. Sir Charles Holroyd's work
was the least ambitious. A single kneeling figure beside
the body of the Christ served to personify his followers,
while a simple landscape formed the background. The
main lines of the composition were restful and dignified ;
the sentiment of the picture was one of calm and tran-
quillity ; it revealed death as a haven of peace. Mr.
Ricketts had seen his subject entirely differently. His
colour was sweet and harmonious, but the lines of his
composition were arranged in a series of gyrating curves,
which rendered it instinct with tumult and movement.
The figures of the Virgin and her female companions, cast
on the ground in an abandonment of grief, carried out
the same thought. It was not the triumph of completed
sacrifice that the artist had tried to express, but the
anguish of death. Among other works of interest were Mr.
Francis Howard's Interlude, a picture of a girl, who, from
her attire, had evidently been taking the part of "prin-
cipal boy,'' resting on a sofa — there was much sterling
work in this, but the interest was too much concentrated
in the lower portion of the canvas; Mr. Charles Buchel's
portrait of Miss Ethel Marsh, an attractive arrangement
in blue and silver; Miss Flora Lion's group of The
Countess of Carrick and Children, with its fresh colour
and unconventional arrangement ; and M r. E. A. Walton's
The Mother. The last-named picture would have been
improved if the artist had altered the position of one of
the woman's arms so as to support the child she was hold-
ing, for the urchin appeared to be resting on nothing.
WHILE it can hardly be gainsaid that constant evolu-
tion is in some degree needful to art's welfare, if not to
. its very life, this inherent need is often
Edinburgh and , , , , , , ,-
& undulv emphasised. And too trequent-
Crlasgow : , ■ . , . ,. , ,
„. . Iv it is made an excuse for slipshod
Modern ' , . , . '
„,, , craftsmanship, another favourite ex-
Monochrome
cuse for the latter being that the artist
must needs express his individuality rather than work
in accordance with a definite regime. Yet is there not
something common to the really great productions of
each separate age, however diverse in manner, however
redolent of their respective makers' personalities? And
Ruskin — to whose thoughtfulness and scholarship many
people are apt to be blinded nowadays by his unfor-
tunate failure to appreciate Whistler — was abundantly
justified in maintaining that there exists an eternal cri-
terion in art, this being especially the case, perhaps,
where work in monochrome is concerned. For although,
of course, Rembrandt materially augmented the pro\ nn e
of etching, teaching those who practise it to attain a
greater richness of tone than had been seen therein
previously ; and although a like development has slowly
been brought about in lithography by various men — for
instance, Delacroix — this does not vitiate the contention
that the beauty pertaining to the fine prints of all periods
is largely similar, depending mainly, as it does, upon good
design. Accurate drawing may be taught, and, valuable
as that capacity is, its possession does not nece^
constitute a skilled etcher or lithographer ; but a real
feeling for artistic arrangement, a genuine gift therefor, —
these are things which are inborn, these are what a
worker in any field of monochrome chiefly needs. And
the truth of all this has been brought home forcibly to
the writer lately while studying two singularly enjoy-
able exhibitions, the one at Messrs. Connell's gallery in
Glasgow, the other at Messrs. Doig, Wilson and Wheat-
ley's in Edinburgh, the nucleus in each case being com-
posed of quite recent art with acid and needle. Indeed,
the avowed raison detre, in either instance, is to give
publicity to the very latest achievements of the latest
noteworthy etchers, some of whom are represented at
both shows with identical prints. And the two collections,
accordingly, may aptly be criticised together, another
which may well be spoken of along with them consisting
exclusively of lithographs by Miss Ethel Gabain, these
being mustered at Messrs. Annan's in Glasgow. Xor
must all available space be used without a few words, if
only a few, concerning certain pictures which Miss Sarah
(',. Adamson is exhibiting in Edinburgh.
Among works by the less familiar of these etchers, one
of the very best is Mr. E. B. Robertson's Richmond Castle,
wherein is registered happily one of those moments when
nature requires a strangely romantic aspect. Turner
would have liked this print, marking in it something of a
resemblance to divers pages in his own Liber Studiorum :
while he would have been quick to praise the fine sense
of largeness embodied in a number of Mr. Oliver Hall's
landscapes, and a speedy appeal would have been made
to him by those of Mr. Bernard Eyre, in each of which
the distance has a beautiful look of remoteness, light
being also suggested ably. The latter element, ap-
parently, holds little interest for Miss Katherine Cameron,
who nevertheless etches flowers and insects with a rare
charm, one for whose like it were necessary to look to
the art of the ( )rient ; and, if it must be owned that her
plates are almost too slight and small to be suitable for
actual wall-decorations, it is equally certain that they
would make delightful book-illustrations, the same being
true of some rather Diireresque studies in architecture by
the French artist, M. Bejot. He, like Miss Cameron,
is evidently uninterested in light ; but the able handling
of this last is met with once again when scanning the
creations of Mr. Martin Hardie, Mr. Alfred Hartley, and
Sir Frank Short, all of whom, waiving their skill herein,
manifest eminentlv that feeling for design exalted above
180
Cu rn v/ / Art Xotes
as the capacity most indispensable for an etcher. Look,
for example, at Mr. Hardie '-. Lonely Willow, al Mr. Hart-
ley'-. Roadway in Northern France and Near Montreuil,
or, better still, at Sir Frank's Solway. In these prints
nothing is particularly well drawn, yet in each instance
there is not one of the scanty details whose position
could be altered without injury to the general effect, the
result being complete and beautiful works of art — etchings
comparable to poems in which something is stated with
the only possible words in the only possible pi
A further etcher evincing real talent is Mr. N. Sp
whose landscapes mostly contain a fine suggestion of
atmosphere : while three men who exhibit notable archi-
tectural studies are Messrs. A. Affleck, F. A. Fanell, and
A. E. Howarth. Turning from their prints to those of
Miss Gabain — who has been widely acclaimed of late
as an adept in lithography, and who figures in the new
edition of Mr. Joseph I'ennell's invaluable treatise on
that art — the first impression received is slight disappoint-
ment. For the artist, being mainly concerned with the
Parisian demi-monde, suffers by inevitably provoking
comparison with the brilliant Gavarni, who handled this
topic on many hundreds of stones. And, clever as Miss
Gabain's works of this sort are, she is really far more
prepossessing in her landscapes, in several of which she
has accentuated the strong blacks at just the right places ;
while a few of her portraits are well posed, notably
He, which adequately fulfils its title, a transient
mood of dr< aminess on the sitter's part being adumbrated.
In a number of her works in these last two classes the
artist has attained that pleasant softness to which litho-
graphy lends itself in expert hands ; yet (he best of her
prints, possibly, is one whii h is 1 ly wrought in a
harder, sharper fashion, inasmuch as it reproduces
Holbein's Edward VI. And it is to be hoped that Miss
Gabain, instead of resting content with this one lithograph
after an old master, will see fit to follow it bj a -'lies.
Espousing a plan which would seem to be growing
more common by degrees. Miss Adamson has not sent
her works to a gallery, preferring to invite pre
public to her own studio ; and if, on initial a< quaintam e
with her output, it looks infinitely slight, is this not a
itive slightness like that of tempered steel ? Not that
strength, in the usually aci epted sense ot the term, is
disclosed by anything from this artist's hand: yet how
great, in real it)-, is the gift she demonstrates ! Her sure
llustrated by her handling of birches in
still more noteworthy in a set of
diminutive figun u< i done on vellum, that difficult
medium sacred to the mediaeval missal-painters. And
fh grasp of its possibilities, frequently
' ompa ing therewith the glitter and piquancy of colour
which are almost its prerogative, while in her pen-and-
ink drawings she shov ell equally a virtuoso. Here
again is grace, together with th.it quality of design which
is more important.
Exhibition of Old English Plate
Tut. exhibition of old English plate held at Messrs.
I ■ i. Ubemai le Street, W. from June 7th to
i8th, in aid of the British Red isisted
of a particularly choice and valuable selection. E |
ally conspicuous was the series lent by then '
the King and Queen. His M i est) - fine epergne,
canopy form, i". ted no little attention, a
also the Queen Anne cup and cover, which was pre-
sented by that sovereign to Sir John Leake, captain of
the Eagle, at the battle of La Hogue, and bears the
inscription: "The Gift of Her Majesty for ye battle
fought against ye French Fleet oft" Cape Malaga, in ye
Mediterranean, ye 13 of August. 1704." Other items
of importance were the coffee-pot which formerly be-
longed to William and Mary, and is engraved with the
royal cypher and arms, and the large cup and cover
presented to Sir Thomas Mundy, Mayor ot Oxford,
in 1761. It is obviously impossible for us to record
in the space at disposal anything like an adequate de-
scription of the various pieces, but mention should be
made of the King's pair of goblets, made in 1660 and
used at the coronation banquet of William and Mar) :
Queen Alexandra's tall cup and cover, \<~)\ in. high,
Italian sixteenth-century style, designed in three tiers
with various architectural and symbolical decorations,
whilst on the cover stands a figure of Chronos : the
Marquess of Downshire's corporation maces of Hills-
borough and Blessington; Mrs. Hornsby Drake's steeple
salt of 1 59v. height \i>\ in. ; Queen Alexandra's pair of
circular gilt tazze, which were presented to the first Duke
of Cambridge, and bear the initials and 1 oronets of h -
brothers and sisters ; Sir Ernest Cassel's "Blacksmith's
Cup" of i'>5;. which was "the Gift of Christopher
Pym upon his admission to the place ol Clerke of this
Company " (the Blacksmiths' , the stem being fashioned
like a figure of Vulcan, and the same owner's steeple
cup of 1610 and bell salt of 1597. The Man
rcular plain sal' 1 1040. engraved
with the aims of Elizabeth, Countess oi Strafford, on
winch Thomas Wentworth, Earl of Strafford, was ■■
for the last time in [641 ; Mr. John Noble a Flemish
sixteenth-century rose-water dish and ewer, as well as
many Other beautiful pieces; and the Duke of Norfolk
the famous Howard Grace cup, [525, which wa
queathed to [Catherine ol \xragon b) Sii Edward
Howard, standard-bearer to Henry VIII, After the
death of the Queen it reverted to the family of the
donor. The Duke of Portland was repn
very numerous collection, amongst which were specially
able the pair of fire-dogs made by Philip I
in 1704, which beat the arms ol Queen Vnne, and
given to Robert Harley by royal warrant, July 15th,
a gilt to I with mytholi
subjci - 1690; the gold christening font, with its
ol Faith, Hope, and Charity, marie by Paul
Storr for the baptism of William Henry, eldest 0
the fourth Duke of Portland welled
and enamelled ■nth-century German
! 1, I .ui of Rosebei | p and
lie attentii n 1 many
of the pieces lent Ufred tie Rothschild
thi Eli; abethan " Dolp
[81
The Connoisseur
cup and cover of 1824, and a gold teapot, which was
the King's plate tor mares, and was won by "Legacy"
at Newmarket in 1736. Mention can only be made of
the collections loaned by Lieut. -Col. Stanyforth which
included two fine potato rings , Lord Swaythling, Mr.
B. J. Warwick, Mr. Asher Wertheimer (including a
magnificent epergne and plateau of 1755), and Mr.
F. A. White ; but special notice should be accorded
to Mr. C. Jackson's wonderful complete set of thirteen
apostle spoons of 1638. Possibly the most apropos
exhibit of the whole collection was the series of plate
belonging to Nelson and bearing his coat of arms, which
came from the Bridport collection of Nelson relics, and
has been placed at the disposal of the Navy League
by an anonymous donor. The pieces were in use on
the Victory right up to Trafalgar.
There are few collections of plate more interesting
than those which belong to some of the English regi-
„ , , . . , mental messes. This is less on
txhibition of r , , . , . ,.
„ . . . account of the beaut v of the mdi-
British , .
D . . , r,, . vidual pieces than that nearly every
Regimental Plate r ' '
one is a memento of some gallant
action performed by the regiment, noteworthy event in
its history, or of some distinguished officer belonging to
it. Thus a look through the loan collection of regi-
mental plate, in aid of the British Red Cross Society,
exhibited at the Goldsmiths' and Silversmiths' Company,
Ltd., 1 12, Regent Street. W., was like reading a chapter
of history presented in a novel and intimate manner.
One, unfortunately, must place the adjective " modern "
before the word " history," for comparatively little of the
old plate has survived the vicissitudes of campaigning
and travel. Much of it has been lost at sea, and some
of it has fallen into hostile hands. Thus the gift of a
large silver service by the Colony of Dominica in 1805
to the 2nd Battalion Duke of Cornwall's Light Infantry
was not only intended to commemorate the successful
defence of the island but to serve as a substitute for
the earlier pieces lost on that occasion. A handsome
antique silver-gilt cup on silver pedestal, designed
by the Princess Augusta, now belonging to the Cold-
stream Guards, was presented by that regiment to the
Duke of York on his retirement from it as Colonel, and,
after passing through the hands of the two Dukes of
Cambridge, was purchased on the death of the last one
and given by an anonymous donor back to the regiment.
Some of the pieces are trophies won at military race
meetings; and one, a silver model of a Nile boat, be-
longing to the 1st Battalion of the Royal Irish Regi-
ment, though not coming within this category, represents
the prize for what was one of the keenest races on record
— the race in 1885 of the English forces up the Nile to
save Gordon. The trophy was bought with the £\oo
presented by Lord Wolseley and won by the "splendid
battalion by having come up the Nile to Debbeh in
boats in less time than any other regiment." Many of
the trophies were highly interesting as records of British
uniforms at various periods. Besides the examples of
regimental plate, there were shown many fine trophies lent
by private and other owners connected with military and
naval history. In this section were included a silver
centre-piece, lent by the Duke of Marlborough, represent-
ing the first duke writing on the field of battle his famous
dispatch announcing the victory of Blenheim : while the
Duke of Wellington lent the well-known Wellington
shield designed by Thomas Stothard, R.A., and presented
to the " Iron Duke " by the merchants of London.
One of the few important picture sales since the out-
break of war took place on June 7th and 8th, when
T, „ , „ , Messrs. Knight, Frank & Rutlev
The Sydney Sale ,. , .. _ ' ,,
dispersed the Sydney collection of
old family portraits and other pictures at Frognal,
Chislehurst. The highest-priced item in the sale was
a three-quarter length portrait 144 in. by 34 in. 1 of
Madame I 'ige'e I.c Brun, /yS2, by herself, which had
been given to Earl Sydney by the Empress Eugenie.
This artist may not have painted self portraits more
frequently than other painters, but they are generally
among her more successful works, and several of them
are well known from being in public galleries. The
present version represented her in white dress, lace
collar and cuffs, holding a garland of flowers and
wearing ostrich feathers in her powdered hair. After
a spirited competition it fell to a bid of ,£6,930. Works
by other well-known artists included the following : —
Thomas Gainsborough, K.A., Miss Marsham, in white
dress and high coiffure, half length (29 in. by 24 in. 1,
£3,600; Sir Joshua Reynolds, P. R.A., George Selivyn,
wearing green coat, powdered wig, and white cravat,
half length (29 in. by 24 in.), .£735; George Romney,
John Thomas, second Viscount Sydney, in blue coat,
yellow vest, and white cravat, half length (29 in. by 24 in. I,
^787 10s. : and John Wootton, A Landscape Portrait
Group of Sir Robert Walpole, with groom holding a
hunter, and hounds 60 in. by 55 in. 1, ,4294.
The chief failing in the British Industries Fair,
held under the auspices of the Board of Trade, at the
Agricultural Hall, was the smallness
of the space at the command of the
executive. The hall is a large build-
ing, but to organise a fair, giving adequate illustration
of the various British industries represented, would need
not one but several buildings of the kind. Nevertheless,
the fair was thoroughly successful, and, following as it
does on the large British pottery fairs held this year
and last at Stoke-on-Trent, may be taken as an instance
that the English manufacturer is at last waking up to the
imperative necessity of holding exhibitions of this nature.
One of the strongest — if not the strongest — sections of the
display was that devoted to china, earthenware, and glass.
Most of the leading makers were represented, and though
in the comparatively small space at command they could
not do full justice to the variety and extent of their
productions, they were able to show their more recent
novelties and examples of their typical wares. It is to
be hoped that an enterprise so well initiated will be
continued next year on a much larger scale.
British Industries
Fair
182
2#K
1U0 tempos cum
mis efta ^giticdt
itrutiisuTvts
^Connoisseur:
BOOKSHELf
^^=~- =re*»«t»- gtf ,„ ^ V
" Report of the
Committee of
Trustees of the
National Gallery"
THE Report of
tlie Co in mi t tic o]
Trustees of the
National Gallery
has been issued at
an unfortunate
moment : the n ar
has obliterated the
little interest which
the British public
formerly took on the
subject of art, and
by the time the
conflict is over the
Committee's repoi t
will probably be for-
gotten. This is the
more to be regretted
as it is a well con
sidered document,
embodying much in-
formation and main
recommendations of
considerable impor-
tance. The report
may be divided into
two sections, one
concerning modern
art and the Othi
that extensive class
of works which come
within the category
of "old masters.
The- latter have been
leaving the country
i n s c 0 res. T h e
i ommitteeeive .1
> - V
+4li,i.mifiuii+t-is+j^im}. rrnj>J
i 1 s Ml-' RN n RY CANDLESTICK, I 782
i ; i i M \ tIA AND A
..,, "CHATS ON OLD SILVER" I ISIIER UNV
l83
list of over five
hundred important
pictures sold out of
the United Kingdom
during recent years,
not a single item in
which but would not
have been a wel-
come addition to the
National Gallery.
If the drain is ■
tinued at the same
rate for a few yeai s,
it appears not un-
likely that no
erpiece of first-
rate importance will
remain in the 1
try outside the public
galleries. Unfortu-
nately, the public
galleries do not
ive adequate
support from either
the Government or
private sources to
enable them to
outflow to any
substantial deg
The annual Govern-
ment g rant to the
National I
the purcli
t UIl's ,|)li'
only j£5,ooo — ex
half the amount that
was given fiftj
when tin
it of
, s "as
tainly under a
fifth of their pn
The Connoisseur
value. In other words, the grant of ,£10,000 given in
[866, and which u.is not then considered as excessive,
would be equivalent in purchasing power to one of
,£50,000 immediately before the war.
It is only fair to the ( iovernment to state that during
recent years the annual grant has been from time to
time increased by additional amounts, so that pictures
of special interest, which happened to be in the market,
might be secured. Including these special grants, the
average amount annually expended by the Government
on works of art for the National Gallery since 1855 has
been as follows : — During the ten years 1855-1865,
£9,830; during the twenty - four years [866-1889,
£13,262; during the eleven years 1890-1900, £8,960;
and during the eleven years 1901-1911, £8,820. It
thus will be observed that the last period shows the
smallest annual expenditure.
If the country had had to depend wholly upon the
Government grant for additions to the National Gallery,
the situation during the last few years would have been
disastrous. As it was, it was to some extent saved
by private beneficence. In 1903 the National Art Col-
lections Fund was formed with the object of supple-
menting Government efforts. Between that year and
191 1 — the last year for which figures are given — while
the Government grants amounted to only £82,000, the
Art Collections Fund contributed ,£119,700 and various
private subscribers ,£30,612. Despite this munificence
on the part of private individuals, the nation has been
deprived of many pictures which would not only have
been advantageous acquisitions for the National Gallery,
but were actually needed to fill up gaps in the collection.
These were secured not only by American multi-million-
aires, who may be supposed to have been willing to pay
prices which no English government would have dared
to rival, but also by the national galleries of countries
far less wealthy than our own. The Kaiser Friedrich
Museum may be taken as an example. During recent
years this institution has bought no less than forty-five
important old masters from English owners. These
included examples by the following artists, who are
either inadequately represented or not represented at
all in the National Gallery :■•— Roger van der Weyden, 1 ;
H. van Eyck, 2 ; J. Zoffany, 2 ; Albrecht Diirer, 4 ;
Joos van Cleef, 1 ; Geertgen van Sint Jans, 1 ; C. Wit/,
1 ; Masaccio, 1 ; and Sassetta, 1. The works of most
of these artists are very rare, and in several instances
the opportunity to secure desirable examples may never
occur again.
Though the grants given by the Government for buy-
ing old masters are small and altogether inadequate,
they are munificent compared with amounts devoted to
the purchase of modern works. Only the Tate Gallery
and the Victoria and Albert Museum are concerned with
these ; the former is wholly concerned with modern
English painting, while the functions of the Museum,
though it was originally wholly intended for the display
of applied art, have been so extended that it now contains
a few old masters, a large number of modern English
and continental works, and the national collection of
water-colour drawings. Oil-paintings are no longer pur-
chased by this institution, though water-colour drawings
are. The amounts expended in buying pictures and
drawings have been gradually decreasing. During the five
years 1891-1895 it averaged ,£784 annually; 1896-1900,
£508; 1901-1905, ,£254; and 1906-1910, £179. For the
last two years of the series, 1909 and 1910, the total amount
thus expended in the recognition of water-colour painting,
the most truly national of all British arts, was £9.
Modern British oil-painting, however, has fared no better.
The sums required for the purchase of pictures for the
Tate Gallery are supposed to come out of the grant to
the National Gallery, and the trustees — perhaps wisely,
considering its small amount — have used it almost entirely
for the latter institution; consequently we have the
anomaly that the Government makes no provision what-
ever for the encouragement of modern English art. As
a contrast to this, in F ranee the sum of about ,£7,000 per
annum is available for the purchase of modern French art,
while in Berlin the national collection of modern German
art has an annual grant of ,£5,000. Other weaknesses
of the English system — or rather want of system — is that
no grant is made for the purchase of modern foreign
pictures or modern sculpture, and the functions of some
of the national collections are to some extent duplicated ;
the Victoria and Albert Museum, more especially, con-
taining a large number of old and modern works, many
of them important, which should come more properly
within the scope of either the National or Tate Galleries.
The recommendations of the Committee to mend this
state of things are well thought out, and are accompanied
by several independent schemes by Lord Curzon, which
they generally endorse. The Committee pronounce
against either placing an embargo or levying a duty on
the export of works by old masters. They recommend
that the annual grant to the National Gallery for the
purchase of pictures should be increased to not less than
£25,000 ; or, failing this, that a duty on important works
of art sold by auction should be levied to provide a
grant ; or that the estate duty on works of art should be
set aside for the purpose. Most people will cordially
agree to the first recommendation being enforced directly
the state of affairs permits. The expedient of raising
money by taxing public sales would probably only cause
the more important works of art to be sold privately, a
procedure which, even under present conditions, is more
and more adopted. A further excellent suggestion by
Lord Curzon is the formation of a Society of Friends of
Art, under the patronage of His Majesty the Kin;;, to
consist of 50 members who would undertake to contribute
either ,£1,000, or, if this be thought too much, £500, for
a minimum of ten years. These subscriptions are to be
devoted to the purchase of works of art for the national
collections. Other recommendations are that the profits
derived from the sale of catalogues and photographs
and admissions to the gallery should also be devoted
to this, instead of, as now, swelling the revenues of the
Government. The income from these sources, in the
case of the National and Tate Galleries, amounts to
about £3, 500, and could probably be augmented. Before
184
GEORGE JOHN" EARL SPENCER, K.G.
BY JOHN SINGLETON COI'I I i
In the possession a* Earl Spencer, K.G., at I
The Connoisseur Bookshelf
POSSET-POT AND COVER
AT VICTOR] \ AND \\ 1:1 l M i
oy
M VRK - ON
; win )
leaving the subject of the Government grants to the
galleries, it may be mentioned, as instances of the com
petition they have to face in securing important pictures,
the Metropolitan Museum, New York, in 191 1, expended
,£112,570 on works for the permanent collection, and
that the income available for this purpose is being con-
stantly increased by bequests anil donations.
01 perhaps even greater importance are the n
mendations of the Committee in regard to the Tate
Gallery. This institution, which more than any othei
should seek to elevate the standard of modern art, is at
nt so situated that its directors can do little towards
that end. It is administered by the National Gallery
board of trustees, who are presumably chosen for their
knowledge of and interest in works b) the old ma
and so are not likely to have much regard for modern
Their tune is almost wholly occupied with the
affairs of the older ga md the newer one is con-
sequently neglected. It has no funds at its comma
the purchase ol works "t art, and the standard
contents, and consequentlj its pre red bv
tin: necessity of having 10 house all the p
by the Royal Academy under the terms of the Chantrey
Bequest, many of which are not considered desirable
additions.
The Committee advocate the gradual conversion of the
gallery "from .1 placi exclusively devoted to mo
British art to .1 galler oi British art, subject to the
proviso that the finest examples of the British ma
should continue, as now, to be hung in the National
Gallery. The relation of the two galleries to each
would thus 11 very much like those of the Luxem-
bourg and the Louvre in Paris, in so far as the yot
gallery becomes a feeder for the olde 1 riding to it
such pictures as have attained to the higher stand. ml ol
the "Id masters." The National Gallery would rei
tding down to the i llery the minor w
of the great masters. A nei try to this is that
the management of the two galleries would I
main 1 mnected, and it is suggested that insti
having an entirely independent b 1 illery,
which rould appear to be the most IV
• should be composed of four or five
membi 1) the National 1 lalli
an equal numbi nment, ai:
in addition an expert ad\ brmed,
ill) consulted by
- whenever it w
'I he 1
Another, the expedii
is that the < government should transfer the administration
of the Chantrey Bequest fron
187
The Connoisseur
reconstituted board of trustees foi the Tate Gallery. It
is no doubt probable that the board would securi
more represi i works than has hitherto been done
by the Academy, but it may be questioned whether, as
it is alleged, the transfer would be "in strict a
with what were undoubtedly the intentions of Sir Francis
Chantrey himself." Chantrey was an academician, and
his likes and prejudices in regard to art were probably
equally as academic as those of the present academicians.
It was not the neglect by the public of a great original
artist like Constable which moved him to make his
bequest, but their neglect of Hilton, an academic painter
of the second rank. It is. however, essential that in
Mime way or other the Government should provide funds
for the purchase of modern, and more especially of
modern English, work. The urgency of the matter will
be understood when it is stated that many sections of
modern British painting are better represented at the
Luxembourg than at the Tate Gallery.
DIGRESSIONS from the point inexcusable in a lecture
or essay may lie forgiven one who only professes to
,. _, _, , " chat " on a subject, vet. making
Chats on Old ,, . , . ' , , ,
„., ,, , allowance for this, one feels that Mr.
Oliver, by
. ., „ , Arthur Havden. in his Chats on Old
Arthur riayden
fT Fishe '' s sornewriat abused the
Un'win. 5s. net) Pnvlley"e' accruing to him from the
use of this title. Thus out of four
and a quarter pages devoted to punch-bowls, something
over a page is given over to a description of Hogarth's
well-known prints of Beer Street and Gut Latu\ while the
mention of a punch-bowl of 1704 serves as an excuse to
drag in a half-page biography of Charles Mordaunt, Earl
of Peterborough, merely because he captured Barcelona
in the following year. Even then Mr. Havden is not
content to restrict himself strictly to his subject, but
introduces quotations from Shakespeare and Milton on
the virtues of ale, reflections on the prevalence of spirit-
drinking during the eighteenth century, and an account
of the origin of the word "punch." It is little to be
wondered at that, after these inroads on his space, the
author has been obliged to content himself with the
description of one variety of punch-bowl, while his account
of punch-ladles is limited to a warning to young col-
lectors to beware of forgeries with dated coins inserted.
The section on punch-bowls is hardly to be taken as
a fair sample of the general contents of the book, yet
throughout its pages the author's deviations into by-paths
must annoy the reader who is in quest of useful informa-
tion. The book, however, also caters for this class of
reader. The tables of date-letters and hall-marks, both
of London and the provinces, are full and well arranged,
and several well-written chapters are devoted to their
explanation. The section on Church plate, though not
giving any pre-Reformation pieces, adequately describes
and illustrates various typical types in vogue between the
reigns of Elizabeth and Anne. Domestic plate is more
unevenly treated, but the chapters on the subject suffice
to give the tyro a good idea of the various types. The
volume, like all the "Chats" series, is well illustrated.
We have received his latest catalogue from Mr. F. K.
Meatyard 59, High Holborn, W.C. . which contains a
... „ , number of interesting items. Es-
A New Catalogue
pecially noticeable are the original
drawings by old masters, conspicuous amongst which
ire the names of Aiken, Cotes, Cotman, Gainsborough,
. Landseer, Rowlandson, Rubens, Rembrandt.
Van Dyck, and that little cultivated but great artist,
Henry Bright. The other part's of the catalogue are
concerned with rare engravings and etching, of interest
to the connoisseur.
AFTER reading Sir Arthur Liberty's interesting diarv
of his adventures, " kernoozing " in Constantinople, one
inclines to the theorv that he is an
The Treasure
Hunt : The
Conspirators in
admirer of Charles Kingsley's breezy
style. It is always interesting to
Constantinople
„ read about the East, but the fact of
the writer being .1 connoisseur of art
Lazenby Liberty object:" confers an additional charm.
(Liberty & Co. T'ie zest °^ acquiring treasures on
2S. 6d. net) :'le 'Pot> as lt "ere, makes the pur-
suit seem real and life-like. The
diary commences with some account of Buda-Pesth.
which, .1, is lightly observed, "has nothing to do with
the Treasure Hunt,'' and continues with a recital of the
adventures of " the Conspirators " in Constantinople,
barred for the present to travellers out of uniform. To
this ?ucceeds an entertaining resume of the purch 1
of beautiful carpets and other objets d'art, as well as the
set-backs and disappointments which attended the peace-
ful campaign. Since this is obviously one of the latest
books on the subject, we can foresee that Sir Arthur
Liberty will have a large audience to the history of his
peregrinations.
A BRANCH of collecting which has come very much
to the fore of late is that which deals with cameos. The
art is an ancient one, and specimens
were prized for their beauty by con-
noisseurs of ancient Rome just as much as by those of
modern London. Although the surface on which the
artist worked was necessarily restricted, it is quite sur-
prising how even subjects comprising many figures could
be depicted with real taste and accuracy. Mr. Edward
Good (1, New Oxford Street. W.C. has, in his col-
lection of some eight thousand specimens, a cameo
representing the Triumph of Ceres, which display?
no less than twenty - four figures in its design. This
remarkable example was carved by and bears the sig-
nature of Lamont, who produced it during the early
part of the nineteenth century. The cameo is singularly
effective for decorative purposes, and in this respect
it is comparable with jewellery made from antique
watch-cocks, which may take the form of pendants,
necklaces, or "mystery" rings with little secret boxes
to hold scent. Mr. Good has published an interesting
little brochure, fully illustrated is. net, wdiich deals
more fully with the subject than we can do in the space
at disposal.
Cameo Collecting
iS.S
The Connoisseur Bookshelf
Tin. origin of English place-names is both a fascinating
and instructive study. By means of it much light is
thrown on the distribution of the
"The Place- eariy inhabitants of the kingdom
Names of England an(J the race ,,,,,,,„ ,,( lU present
and Wales," by population. Unfortunately, the way
the Rev. James B. Qf ^ .tudem ;s be5et with difficui.
Johnson M.A., tjes; the primitive names have be.
' ' ('° n . come so changed in form and sound
Murray. 15s.net) , . .
' during the course <>t centuries that
many of them are hardly recognisable in their present
aspect. Instances frequently occur when a Celtic name
is presented under a Saxon form, resembling it in pro-
nunciation but wholly different in meaning; while in a
few cases nearly all the many rai es who have migrated
into these islands since the beginning of recorded his
appear to have had a share in clothing a place-name
in its present garb. The result 1-. that most books on
the subject teem with errors, largely caused by writers
accepting the current spelling of a name without troubling
to trace it back to its earliest recorded forms. In this
respect The Place-Names of England and Wales, by the
Rev. |ames B. Johnson, shows a marked advance on
earlier works of a similar character. This is the more
praiseworthy, , because, as a busy clergyman in a Scottish
provincial town, having only brief intervals of leisure to
consult the public libraries in Edinburgh and Glasgow,
he was greatly handicapped in his study of the subject.
With him, however, his work has been a labour of love,
and as the fruit of twenty years' research, he has given
us what is undoubtedly the most complete and reliable
dictionary of English place-names that has yet been
published. It was, of course, not to be expected that
all Mr. Johnson's four or live thousand derivations
should be free from error, and several, at all events,
appear open to question. Space will not permit the
examination of these doubtful examples, but one may
be cited less with the idea of proving Mr. Johnson to be
wrong than of showing the enormous difficulties of his
task. The instance in question is " Malmesbury," the
derivation of which is given as from " Madulf's burgh " ;
Maidulf, according to William of Malmesbury, being an
Irish hermit, who established a monastery there during
the seventh century, in which the famous Aldhelm, Bishop
of Sherborne, was one of Ins pupils. William attempts
to prove his assertion bj 1 iting an early charter in which
Bishop Leutheris, of Winchester, grants to Aldhelm, the
priest, land the name of which is Maidulfsbrig. This
charter, if genuine, would conclusively identify Malmes-
bury with Maidulfs town, the name of the mona
where, according to Bede, Aldhelm was educated. On
the face of it. Mr. Johnson was justified in accepting im h
authority as conclusive. Mr. A. F. Leach, however, in
his interesting Schools oj Mediaeval England, has gone
still deeper into the matter, and has practically p
that William of Malmesbury's seventh-century chartei
was a pious fraud, that it is que I onable whether the
Irish hermit Maidulf was not merely a figment of his
imagination, and that Aldhelm had probably no con-
nection at all with Malmesbury. The derivation of the
name he gives as being from "the bury or fortified hill
of malm.'' This is probably correct, for the Ordnance
Geological Survey shows Malmesbury as the northern-
most and culminating point of a narrow streak ot
. or malm. whi( h las west of the chalk which fi
the greater part of Wilts.
M.i,] abbreviations of standard works are to be
avoided. A book which has attained a position as
a classi, is generally of sufficiently
"Memoirs of the sustained interest to make every
Duke de Saint W(,n| ,jf ;t worth rcading : and this
Simon," an ^^ l10vvever] ;s made gooi
abridged trans- no( a fcw exceptions— exceptions,
Ution by Francs molcovel. which wil, ;,nm more
numerous as the mass of literature,
which each student must master
before he can be considered well
Arkwright
Vols. I. and II.
(Stanley Paul
and Co., in 6 vols.
,, , ., read, grows more prodigious.
10s. 6d. each net) ' =
These exceptions must obviously
include the Memoirs of the Puke de Saint Simon. It
is a work of enthralling interest, which no student ot
the periods of Louis XIV. and Louis XV. can
lect, but its immense bulk may well daunt the
hardiest reader. Saint Simon, though a genius, was not
a professional writer, and he possessed main ol the
failings of the amateur. His narrative, almost epigram-
in its terseness in places where his pen was cai ei
by strong personal feeling, at other times bei
prolix, and more especially is this the case when
prerogatives of his ducal title were concerned. 1 >n this
subject Saint Simon was obsessed ; any infringeme
his rights he treated with a prolixity of detail which
speedily becomes wearisome ; so that a judicious curtail-
ment ot his book can well be made without depriving
it of any of its essential interest or charm ot p<
ality. Mr. Francis Arkwright in his newly pub!
translation has sin reeded in achieving this. Ins ab
ment reading like an original work, and preserving
the raciness of Saint Simon's narrative to a remarkable
ee. This is the more praiseworthy as the Dukes
French is by no means ,1 ide iui n col-
loquialisms which are difficult to transfer 10 a fo
language. The first two volumes of the translation take
the reader up to the death of Madame de Montespan in
1707. The\ cover the period of the zenith of Lotus XIV.
and his decline. It a wonderful panorama of the
age that Saint Simon presents to us. the more 1 on
and graphic because he was an observer rather than an
ai toi m the gii'.ti events among which he moved, and
could view tin-in with a certain amount ot detachment.
I h. nigh not in office, he was general!) taken into
ridence by those who were, ami so the motives under-
lying the acts ot the kmg and his ministers wen
hare to his pitiless scrutiny. In the att ot drawing a
ke portrait in a few pregnant sentences, and ot
1 ting a dramatii s< ene with a vi\ idness
tion that mak. ai real, the duke has had leu
rivals. Mr. Arkwright's translation, in spite 1
densation, ma n ■ one ol the best
perhap .even the besl English editions of the Memoirs
fi .1 the general
189
The Connoisseur
VALUATION AND
CORRESPONDENCE DEPARTMENT
Special Notice
Enquiries should be made upon the coupon which will be found in the advertisement pages. While,
owing to our increased correspondence and the fact that The Connoisseur is printed a month before
publication, it is impossible for us to guarantee in every case a prompt reply in these columns, an
immediate reply will be sent by post to all readers who desire it, upon payment of a nominal fee. Expert
opinions and valuations can be supplied when objects are sent to our offices for inspection, and, where
necessary, arrangements can be made for an expert to examine single objects and collections in the country
and give advice, the fee in all cases to be arranged beforehand. Objects sent to us may be insured whilst
they are in our possession, at a moderate cost. All communications and goods should be addressed to the
"Manager of Enquiry Dept., The Connoisseur, 35-39, Maddox Street, W."
ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS
Engravings and Etchings.
Bartolozzi Prints. — A9.394 (Ware). — If your four
coloured engravings, entitled Morning, Noon, Evening, and
\ . by F. Bartolozzi and Tomkins, alter Hamilton, are
genuine, they are of some value, but as there have been
numerous reproductions, we must see the prints themselves
before appraising a definite value.
Wood Engravings by F. Sandys.— Ac,, 397 (Bishop's
Waltham). — To answer the whole of your enquiry would neces-
sitate a lengthy search at the British Museum. We can say
briefly, however, that (i) //appeared in The Argosy (which
commenced in 1868), the original drawing being exhibited at
the " Arts and Crafts " of 1893 : (2) Medea was reproduced as
a silver-print photo in Colonel Richard's poem of that title
(Chapman & Hall, 1S69) ; and (3) DanJe appeared on page 147,
Volume III., of the Century Guild Hobby- Horse (Chiswick
Press).
Miscellaneous.
Abraham Burton, Watchmaker. — A9.387 (Wake-
field).— Abraham Burton, the watchmaker, was apprenticed to
Richard Masterman in 1650. He entered the Clockmakers'
Company in 1657, and was living in 1700.
Royal Academy. — A9,3S9 (Taunton). — The Royal Aca-
demy was founded in 1768, the first president being Sir Joshua
Reynolds. Burlington House did not serve as the headquarters
until 1869. Previous to then, the exhibitions had been held at
Pall Mall, Somerset House, and the National Gallery.
Painters and Paintings.
Unidentified Paintings. — An, 335 (Portsmouth). —
Owners of unidentified paintings of all descriptions should
have them reproduced in our NOTES and Queries Section,
which has proved an excellent medium for all purposes con-
nected with the tracing, locating, or ascription oi works of art
of all descriptions. The April instalment introduced a remark-
able case of identification to our readers. The two paintings
reproduced side by side on page 211 of that issue, the original
portrait of Jules H. Forget, 1779. and the copy made specially
for another branch of the family, have attracted no small
attention from art-lovers. And this is only one from the lengthy
list of successes achieved by the department, which, apart from
the general interest attaching to them, afford excellent proofs
of the value of Noi ES AND QUERIES a- a medium of identifica-
tion. Possessors of doubtful pictures have applied to us as a
last resource, and if they have any appreciable interest attaching
to them, the desired information is almost certain to be elicited
1 or later. The Connoisseur reaches collectors even
in the most remote portions of the civilised world, which, of
course, does not include certain European countries at the
present day, and thus provides a means of communication be-
tween connoisseurs who would otherwise have been entirely
cut off. We are glad to say, moreover, that those who have
exhibited their treasures in these columns express their satis-
faction at the method of reproduction, the fixed charge for
which is 10s. 6d. per block. A recent letter from an American
client says, " I wish to tell you how much I liked the way you
handled my portrait; the cut was splendid. I thank you":
whilst a Scottish correspondent writes, "The portrait of
looks very well in your i-s.te ; thanks." The Enquiry Manager
is always pleased to give further information on this subject
and to answer questions which may occur to intending clients.
Water-Colours by T. B. Hardy.— A9. 395 (Gerrard's
Cross). — At Christie's, March 7th, 1910, Portsmouth (15J in.
by 39i in.), by T. B. Hardy, realised /,27 6s., whilst the same
artist's Venice (12; in. by 20 in.) sold for .£33 I2s. at the
same rooms on November 2Sth, 19 10. We should require to
see the paintings you mention before being in a position to
appraise a value.
II Kustico. — A9, 396 (Edinburgh). — "II Rustico" was the
appellation of Rustici, a Sienese painter of grotesque subjects,
who lived during the sixteenth century. His grandson, who
died in 1625, was called " II Rustichino," and painted his-
torical works. Francesco Ruschi, or Rusca, as it was
sometimes spelt, was a seventeenth-century historical painter
at Rome, and studied under Michael Angelo da Caravaggio,
the celebrated Italian artist (1569-1609).
Muccioli. — A9,;99 (Worcester). — There were two painters
of this name, father and son. The former, Bartolomeo,
flourished at Ferrara during the fifteenth century, whilst the
latter. Benedetto, lived at Urbino circa 1402. Both produced
historical subjects.
190
The Connoisseur
Wills and Testaments:
Their Value to the Antiquary, the Genealogist, and the Topographer
BY RICHARD HOLWORTHY, F.S.G.
CONSIDERING the gicat amount of valuable
information which is to be obtained from wills for the
antiquary, as well as for the genealogist and topographer,
it is surprising that more use has not been made of these
records in the past, or at all events that more exhaustive
searches have not been made in them. Indeed, many
county and parish historians have entirely ignored the
fund of personal information contained in wills, some
on account of the immense amount of material to be
searched and its inaccessibility, and others from a want
of knowledge of serious research.
Every genealogist knows that wills form the backbone
of his subject ; that no pedigree can be compiled without
them; and that no family history can be completed with-
out the personal touch to be obtained from them which
raises it above the dryness of a sixteenth-century visitation
pedigree. The serious parochial writer cannot perform
his work without having searched wills, to trace the
families and the distribution and descent of lands in his
parish, and to acquaint himself with the numerous refer-
ences to be found to the church, and perhaps to trace
the origin of articles which have been stowed away for
centuries in the parish chest.
There is, however, another use for wills which seems
to have escaped the attention of most antiquaries, that
is the possibility of identifying portraits, or tracing some
relic, with an historic association of which we were
ignorant, or about which we had but a vague tradi-
tion. For instance, a reference was recently found in
a will of about 1790 to Oliver Cromwell's coffee-pot,
which was then in the possession of the testator; this
article may now be lying covered with dirt in some old
outhouse, the owner having no idea of its associations
and value.
As we have already said, for the genealogist will, are
indispensable, nut only those of the surname in which he
is interested, but of other families which are apparently
unconnected. It can be safely said that no pedigree of
eight or nine generations can show the marriages of all
members of a family, but most of the missing man i -
could be found it a thoroughly exhaustive search of wills
was made. Generally speaking, .1 >< -1 ttoi mentions all
his children, and in cases « here his daughters are mat ried
he will almost certainly mention the names of their hus-
bands. Thus it we arc interested in the family of one of
the husbands, we get the name and parentagi ol hi ■ fi
and othei valuable information ut her family, which
might not be obtainable elsewhere j or we n ghl prove
her to be an heiress, and thus be able to add another
quartering to the family arms.
. It is not only relations about whom we get these
interesting notes, but also other people in no way related
to the testator, as 'the average number of different sur-
names mentioned in a will is about a dozen. Many a
difficult problem in identity has been solved by a signa-
ture, and there are generally three signatures of witnesses
on each will, as well as that of the testator.
It is these hidden references that the genealogist wants,
and which he has been unable to get. For instance, in
the will of Robert Sowthey, of Woodford, in Wellington,
co. Somerset, yeoman, dated 1670, we find, amongst
other references, the names of the husbands of his four
daughters, viz. Anne, wife of Anthony Coiding; Eleanor,
wife of Thomas Munday ; Alice, wife of John Coles; and
Mary, wife of Thomas Cording. Having got the name
and parentage of the wife of Thomas Munday, we might
also find some useful information about his family in the
wills of the Cordings and the Coles.
For another example we give an abstract of the will of
Hester Musgrave, of Wellington, widow, dated 1710. who
desires to be buried privately without pomp at Bristol,
and to be laid near her father's grave, or if she die else-
where, to be buried at Topsham, co. Devon. She
mentions her son, Humphrey Holway ; Cousins Sarah and
May Daniel, of Bristol, and their sister, Susannah Daniel,
to whom she has already given a "golden medall."
[Catherine Hellier, of Taunton, widow. Grace G
widow. Ann- Pring, widow. Bridget V, invert, my kins-
woman, and her husband, of the Island of Guen
and their four children. Robert Worth, of London.
Mary Bowerman, of Topsham, widow, and her daughtei
l'at. Susanna Trevella, widow, grand-daughter of my
sister, Mary Stevens. William. Thomas, and Daniel,
-1 William Best, and his late wife Hester, ol 1
sham, and their daughtei Elizabeth. George Cockrr: ,
of this town, sergemaker. Joseph Weekes, of Little
Sampford, tanner, and his son Joseph. Hannah ( ole,
..1 Bristol. William Best, junr. , my silver tankard, which
belonged to m) son, Humphrey Holway, having his
is on it. Humphrey Berry, ol Wellington, 1
' hi 111 Sarah Edwards, oi London, and her hu
To .... Thesayer, of Grei ■ h, co. Kent. 1
daughter of my brother-in-law, Thomas Hollaway, late
-I' ill. marine] . 1- ett. James Pai
oi Samford. The w ■-. Kennaway, John
and Mary Kennaway. This will mentions no
101
The Connoisseur
than twenty-three different surnames, and gives many
valuable clues concerning some of the people mentioned
in the will which might be unobtainable elsewhere. For
instance, if we were interested in the family of Thomas
Hollaway, late of Greenwich, and had no idea as to
where he came from, this hidden reference would im-
mediately suggest to us that he came from the Wesl
Country.
For a short example of the topography to be gleaned
from wills, the following abstract of the will of John
Kawkener, of Waldron, co. Sussex, will suffice : — " The
parcel of march land in Mauxey and Pevensey, parcel of
the manor of Lampham, called the Twelve Acres, to the
north of the way leading from Chercheaker Bridge to
Ryene Bridge ; also lands in Barwashe, purchased of
Thomas Greene, and John, his son, called Mottingsden. "
By the aid of wills these very lands might be traced for
centuries.
Even those who ridicule genealogical research, and
perhaps look upon it as a form of snobbishness (there are
still some who regard it in this lights, must find amuse-
ment in reading some old wills. In that of Thomas
Curtis, dated 5 January, 1797, there is an entertaining
little passage, in which he requests " a stone to be erected
to the memory of my father and mother, uncle and aunt
Curtis, and self, and if you can squese in Jack do ; this is
poor Tom's will, and make no doubt but it will occasion
,1 smile." And later, " A guine for poor Poll Thare, which
has been my Semstress for many years.'' Another good
example is the will of John Hedges, Esq., written in
verse, and which was duly proved in the Prerogative
Court of Canterbury in July, 1737, and is not unique :—
This 5th day ot May
Being Airy and Gay
To Hipp not enclind
But of Vigorous mind
And my Body in Health
lie dispose of my Wealth,
And of all I'm to leave
On this side of the Grave
to some one or other
I think to my Brother
But because I foresaw
That my Brethren in Law
If 1 did not take Care
Woud come in for a Share
Which I noe ways intended
Till their Manners were mended
(And of that God knows there's no sign)
I do therefore Enjoyn
And do strictly command
Witness my hand
That nought I have got
Be brought in Hotch Pott
But I give and devise
As much as in me lyes
To the Son of my Mother
Myn own Dear Brother
To have and to hold
All my Silver and Gold
As the Affectionate Pledges
Of his Brother John Hedges.
As we have pointed out, the average number of sur-
names mentioned in a will is about a dozen ; therefore, if
there are one hundred wills entered in the calendars for
a particular family, there should be some twelve hundred
of these hidden references, which without doubt would
clear up many a problem. We will now show how these
notes are to be obtained, and the least expensive way of
doing it.
It is intended to commence by searching all the wills
in the Prerogative Court of Canterbury for the year [661,
a year which proved to be a turning-point in history, and
of particular interest to the genealogist, both in England
and America, as after the Restoration many who, owing
to the civil wars, had left their native parishes to seek
their fortunes in the great towns, or who had undertaken
the perils of a two months' journey across the Atlantic to
escape from the religious persecution of the day, now
returned to the homes of their birth, or, failing this,
found notice in the wills of those left behind.
On the co-operative system, which we adopted some
time ago with excellent results, the search can be made
at a purely nominal cost, a subscription of 8/6 being
sufficient for all references to any one place or surname,
however spelt, for 1 661.
Should this search prove a success, it is hoped to go
through the wills for other years in the same way. It is,
of course, unnecessary to point out that such a search
will take several weeks to complete, and therefore could
not be made specially without considerable expense.
Those wishing to avail themselves of this offer should
send in their names at once to the Genealogical Editor,
The Connoisseur, 35 to 39, Maddox Street, London, W.
Registered for transmission to Canada at Magazine Post Rates. Printed by Bemrose & Sons Ltd., 4 Snow Hill, London, E.C., and
Derby, and published by the Proprietors, Otto Ltd., at HANOVER BUILDINGS, 35 to 39 MADDOX STREET, LONDON, W.. England.
Subscriptions-Inland 16,-, Foreign 17/-, to Canada 1 4/-, per annum. Published the 1st of each month. Published by Gordon & Gotch,
in Australia and New Zealand; by The Central News Agency, in South Africa; by Higgmbotham & Co, in Bombay and Calcutta; and
by The International News Co., in U.S A.
THE SHEPHERDESS.
BY JOHN RAPHAEL SMITH.
AFTER S. WOODFORD.
Al Gl ST.
IQ15.
War and British Art
BY THE EDITOR
Optimistic critics are looking to the war
for a great renaissance in English art, an idea which
probably owes its genesis to a sentence in one of
Mr. George Moore's essays on Modern Faulting. He-
writes: "It has been said that art is decay, the pearl
in the oyster ; but such belief seems at variance with
any period of history. The Cheek sculptors came
after Salamis and Marathon : the Italian renaissani e
came when Italy was distracted with revolution and
was divided into opposing states. . . . Art came
upon Holland after heroic wars in which the Dutch-
men vehemently asserted their nationhood, defending
their country against the Spaniard, even to the point
of letting in the sea upon the invaders. Art came
upon England when England was most adventurous,
after the victories of Marlborough. Art came upon
France after the great revolution, after the victories of
Marengo and Austerlitz, after the burning of Moscow."
This theory is fascinating. One would like to
ai cept it, but there are difficulties in the way. The
exceptions to the rule are so numerous that they
destroy instead of prove it. Innumerable wars and
great national movements have occurred without being
followed by art, and art has originated in periods of
profound stagnation. Another source for its origin
must be looked for, and this is easily found. All the
periods of art, which Mr. Moore has mentioned, have
I olb iwed on wars and great movements of nationhood.
Hut they have also come during periods of greal
national prosperity; and, as prosperity appears to be
the invariable forerunner of art, we must look on
wealth rather than on war as the source of art. I.et us
recapitulate some of Mr. Moore's instances, and add
to them others, to see how they bear out this theory.
'Ihe Greek sculptors came when the Athenians ruled
the sea and enjoyed a practical monopoly of maritime
ti.ule : Italian an came when the commerce of the
East flowed through the . ities of the Peninsula : the
early art of Flanders and Germany when their cities
wen most rich and powerful. On the instance ol
Holland Mr. Mo, .re lays spe< i.d emphasis, yet tins
is the instance which most completely disproves his
theory. It is true thai Rembrandt and the Dutch
school came into being after the heroic resistance "l
the ' ountry to Spam, but it was preceded and rivalled
by ih'' school of Flanders— with Rubens and Van
Dyck; and Flanders had meekly accepted the Spanish
yoke. Km Flanders had regained its lost wealth
when art came upon it a second time : and the gn al
era of Dutch painting took place when Holland was
mistress of the seas and Amsterdam tin gn atest mart
in Europe. The dominion and the trade ol tin
passed to England, and in their train followed art.
Art, indeed, is like a house of cards, built up slowly
and laboriously during the prosperous times of pea< i .
and blown down almost instantly by the rude breath
of war and adversity. The proi ess has bei n re]
several times in England. Our early illuminations
and a few pictures surviving, dating from ;1 i i
of Richard II., show that in the fourteenth century
we had a school of painting worthy of comparison
with any of the Continent. The Wars of the
Roses destroyed it and almost obliterated its trao
Holbein established a school of miniature pain
which, nearly submergi cl during the troubled reigns of
Edward VI. and Mary, produced some notable artists
in the more settled times that followed. Nicholas
Hilliard, the two Olivers, John Hoskins, and Samuel
Cooper form a succession of native-born miniature
painters whose art will hold its own with that of any
country or period. Cooper, the last of the line, was
born in [609 : he survived the Civil War, and lived
until 1 672, twelve years after the Restoration. He and
his brother Alexander, lor wan: ol English patronage,
were compelled to spend much of their time abroad,
and left behind them no native-born successors worthy
of note. The Civil War had extinguished this
flourishing branch of English art, and prevented the
birth of a native school of painting, which, under the
inspiration of Van 1 >yck, had seemed likely to ( merge
into independent being.
The time when art came to England was during
the period when national and political life seemed
iii" ' utterly stagnant -a stagnation induced b)
leiitiiu nt and advani ing material prosperity. Wa :
tin' originator of this state of affairs, hai been in
■ in 1 7 15, and again l» ■ ame Prime Mini ti
r 7 J 1. He held ih' 1,111 of 1 illicc until 1 742, I I
these \ ears tin , ounti y si 1 med to slei p,
then that modern English painting came into
Kin Hi r, who died in 1723, was the last ol thi
foreigners who exercised sup, 0 1 English art.
Vol. XI. II.- No. n -
IM-
The Connoisseur
In all the il i ffere n i
branches Englishmen
I" i ame leaders when
before they had only
hem followers. These
early leaders were not
greatmen; John Smith,
themezzotintengrai er,
being perhaps the most
noteworthy, for he
raised h i s art to a
degn r of perfection
it had never before
attained, and a 1 most
anticipated the tri-
umphs of the later
eighteenth-cent ury
masters. Thornhill in
decorative painting,
Richardson, and after
him Hudson, in por-
traiture, and Kent in
architecture, were only
artists of the second
rank. But the pecuni-
ary success and pres-
tige gained by them
beat up recruits for art from
Thus, when Joshua Reynolds
becoming a painter or a
country apothecary, it was
the example of Hudson —
like himself, a Devonshire
man — that weighted the
scales in favour of art.
The first master-painter
was Hogarth. He would
probably have remained a
jeweller's engraver had not
thriving times ensured a
demand for his prints, and
afterwards for his pictures.
His art was wholly a pro-
duct of the prosperity of
the middle classes. They
bought his prints — biting
satires on high life, which
the aristocracy thought
vulgar — and commissioned
most of his portraits and
conversation pieces. He
had gained his reputation
b e f o r e the war of the
Austrian .Succession, which
4P' -
I.ADY JANE '.ORE BY RICHARD COSVl U
IN THE PIERPONT MORGAN COLLECTION
all over the country,
was hesitating between
CHARLES II. BY SAMUEL COOPER
IN THE PIERPON1 MORGAN COLLECTION
broke out in I 740. It
interrupted English
prosperity tor a time—
Hogarth was compel-
led to sell his best
pictures by auction for
ridiculous prices in
1745 and 1750 — but
freed the country for
ever from the fear of
a Jacobite revolution.
The middle of the
eighteenth century saw
England at peace, her
power firmly establish-
ed, her commerce
fl ourishing, and the
golden era of her art
commencing. English
painters, instead of
atrophying their talents
in provincial towns,
flocked to the metro-
polis. Hudson, the most
fashionable teacher
as w ell as the most
fashionable portrait
painter of his time, was already established there, as
was Hogarth and many of their contemporaries; but
it was the younger genera-
tion of artists who were to
give English art a world-
wide reputation. Cotes, a
native of London, was in
residence there ; Reynolds
came in 1752, the same
year as Allan Ramsay ; and
Richard Wilson in 1755.
They had been preceded
by Benjamin Wilson and
Gavin Hamilton, and were
followed by several foreign-
ers like Zuccarelli and
Cipriani. Gainsborough,
having set up in London
during the war, and failed,
had gone to Ipswich ; Hoare
was working at Bath ; and
Romney in 1756 set up his
easel at Kendal. Thus in
the first decade of the half-
century England's greatest
genre painter, her three
greatest portrait painters,
11)')
// 'ar and British Art
and her two greatest landscape painters before Turner
and ('unstable, were all in full work.
Art was showing itself in other directions than in
Wheildon and Wedgwood entered into partnership
m 1754; Worcester commenced in 1751. I
in 1752, and Derby and Lowestoft in 1
.1 \\l COl NT1 - VRRINl ! I
FROM INK MEZZOTINT BY VALENTIN! GREEN, Mill; SIR ' \ Ml
painting. Chambers, lately returned from his Eastern
tour, was proving himself the greatest English archi-
tei t -.1111 e Wren ; MacArdell and Houston had begun
the golden period of English mezzotint ; < 'hippendale
was achieving fame as a furniture-maker, and the
publication of his Geritleman and Cabinet-maker's
Director in 1754 showed that there was a large public
ready to buy costly household furniture. Many of
the most famous pottery and pun tlain works were
being founded. Bow and Chel ea dale from before
1750. Aaron Wood set up lor himself m this year;
In the last-nami d yeai thi Sevi n N ears' War com-
menced. Its spoils were so colossal that it helped
rather than hindered the trade ol the country. The
peace which followed saw England at the height of
her manual prosperity and political greatness, and at
her artistic zenith. Only Hogarth was missing from
ranks ol her leading oil-painters ; but G
borough and Romneyhad come to town, and recruits
like Stubbs, Copley, Dance, and Zoffany gave bright
promise lor the future. Miniature panning had been
revived, and flourished as it never had doi
197
The Connoisseur
Nathaniel Hone, Cosway, Smart, Humphrey, Shelley,
and Bone were the leaders of a group to whom were
presently to be added Engleheart and the two Plimers.
Russell and Downmam were producing their beautiful
portrait drawings. Hanks. Nollekens, and Bacon had
appeared in sculpture: the brothers Adam in archi-
tecture and furniture design, and in the latter mitier
Hepplewhite, Sheraton, and a number of lesser men.
Perhaps the artistic greatness of the period is best
reflected in the engravings of the time. In the three
methods of mezzotint (with the exception of mezzo-
tint landscape), line, and stipple, the best work ever
executed in England was produced, and produced
with such prodigality that the list of distinguished
engravers makes a lengthy document. The Watsons,
Green and J. R. Smith, Strange and Woollett and
Bartolozzi, were among the best in their respective
metier : but there were others who were practically
equal to them.
The War of American Independence in 1774 did
no good to either English trade or English art. It
lasted for eight years, and we lost it. But eight
years' war at that period was hardly as exhausting as
is eight months' war at the present time. The full
strength of the country was not pressed into the
venture. The Navy, indeed, was nearly as large as
we could make it: but the Army was so small that
in the decisive battle of the war only 5,000 English
troops were engaged. England suffered less than any
of the other countries engaged, and though doubtless
many of the lesser artists were hard-pushed, art on
the whole was not materially affected. Nevertheless,
there was a general trend in the direction of economy.
The Adam brothers were substituting stucco for stone
in house-building, stamped compo for wood-carving
in furniture, and stoneware was being used instead of
porcelain. In painting, sculpture, and engraving the
golden period still continued, and the younger genera-
tion of artists presented almost as great names as
their predecessors. When peace was made in 1782,
Beechey and Bewick were 29, Flaxman 27, Raeburn
26, Blake 25, Hoppner 23, Opie 21, William Ward 20,
and Lawrence and James Ward, both of whom even
then were committed to an artistic career, 13. The
ten years of peace which preceded the outbreak of
the great war with France brought with them flourish-
ing trade, more especially in artistic wares. English
prints, pottery, and furniture were largely exported
to the Continent. Then came the French Revolution
and the opening of hostilities, and France, our best
continental market, was entirely cut off.
The fashionable portrait painters probably suffered
little, for their patrons, the landowners, who profited
by the dearness of corn and beef to increase then
rents, and the great manufacturers, who were supply-
ing all the armies of Europe with munitions of war,
were increasing in wealth: but minor painters, en-
gravers, and others, who depended upon middle-class
support, suffered greatly. Unfortunately, it is only the
lives of the greater artists which have come down to
us, and so we hardly realise the privations brought
on the rank and file by the war : yet the records of
the rising generation of well-known painters show a
pecuniary state of affairs far worse than in the days
of their predecessors. Few of them could make a
living by the sale of their pictures. Turner supported
himself by making topographical drawings for book-
publishers ; Girtin painted a panorama : Constable
and Hilton were partially kept by their fathers: Heapy,
while exhibiting at the Academy, coloured prints :
Uwins copied engravings: Stothard illustrated books:
Cox, Cotman, Crome, Copley Fielding, Cristall,
Glover, Sawrey Gilpin, and Varley, with many others,
lived by giving drawing lessons. Matters were even
worse among the engravers. The outbreak of war
occurred during the finest and most prolific period
of English mezzotint. Most of the great masters
were alive and producing their finest work. One by
one the older men succumbed before the changed
conditions. The two most renowned mezzotinters
of the time were probably Valentine Green and J. R.
Smith : both published and sold prints as well as
engraved them, and both were men of substance.
The war caught Green in the midst of his great
venture of reproducing the pictures at the Dusseldorf
Gallery. The war ruined him. After a few years of
hopeless struggling, he was saved from want by being
appointed keeper of the British Institution. Smith
carried on for a few years, and then relinquished both
engraving and publishing to retire to the country.
Dickinson went to Paris. Hodges to Holland: while
Dean, Hudson, Grozer, Keating. James Ward, George
1 >awe, Earlom, and Young, all gave up engraving,
the last-named accepting the keepership of the British
Institution rendered vacant by Green's death in 1S13.
Sculpture, architecture, ceramic art, and cabinet-
making — all the graphic and applied arts, indeed —
withered under the blast of the war. Sculpture suffered
the least, for it had attained no flourishing growth,
and so its decline was the less marked. Of the
pseudo-classical stucco architecture which appeared
after the war, little good can be said, except that it
was cheap ; and cheapness was also the characteristic
of early nineteenth-century furniture and pottery. The
artistic element was omitted. In the great periods of
English furniture, architects and sculptors like Wren.
Gibbon, Kent. Chambers, and the Adams brothers
had elevated the standard of taste by supplying
7l|S
War and British Art
makers with designs: and it may be surmised that it
was largely through their instrumentality that the
most beautiful of the types were evolved. The war
irniture design in the hands of the cabinet-makers,
and its decline at once commenced. The Empire
which came into vogue in 1703, was a clumsy
and the new 1 were
either oi foreign origin or worthless. Raeburn, amid
the conservative associations of a provini ia
continued the traditions of British portraiture; Con-
stable, Crome, Cotman, and the ,vater-
colour painters continued the tradition of Ei
CHIPPENDALE \I'M< II All
imitation of the French, and after the wane ol the
"Empire," furniture cea es to have any interest to the
colli 1 tor. The decline of furniture was only a little
more marked than that of porcelain and pottery.
Many well-known artists like Thornhill, Roubillac,
Moser, Bacon, Flaxman, Stubbs, and Bone, had
worked tor potters in the eighteenth centur) ; theii
.1 !;' igel I ' ' "l an interior type, while
many of the most celebrated factories were eithei
closed Mown or passed into other hand
What has been said is sir 0 show thai the
war of the Revolution and thi Empire, more pro
longed and exhausting than any in which En
had bi tged --mce the hundred years' struggle
with Frani id of giving a quickening impulse
to British art, nearly destroyed it. The old traditions
interrupted, and in most cases aim
IN Mil OAN] M
landscape; and Turner, during the time he was not
following the will-o'-the-wisp of French seventeenth-
1 entury classicalism, developed them to a still fu
e. But thesea
and the contemporary neglect ol ork showed
that they wi re oul ol touch with their times. V
tint and stippli 1 the mixed style — a
bastard combination ol nearly ever) method of en-
ngonthi same plate — and David Lucas, tin
great follower ol the eighteenth centur) mezzotint
school, died in the workhi 1 Sculpture 1
into the polishi d insipidities ol Gibson and
and the ind superficial work ol I hai
miniature painting into highly finished prettiness :
1 iousness.
A hundred years has elapsed sim e the 1
finishi d, am no w de up
[99
The Connoisseur
the leeway lost to English art through its occurrence.
Sculpture is certainly improved : architecture, if it
has not bettered the best things of the late Georgian
era, is far more various ; in painting there is generally
a higher standard of accomplishment, especially in
draughtsmanship, and a far greater output of good
work ; yet portraiture has not attained its former
standard, and even in landscape, genre, and military
pictures the work of Gainsborough, Wilson, Hogarth,
Morland, and Copley make one hesitate to award
has been built up during a hundred years of com-
parative peace ; for though war has occurred, no
echoes of the actual fighting have penetrated across
the sea to England. Now, as in the great French
war, the struggle is raging at our gates : it is strain-
ing the resources of the country to the utmost, and
personal as well as national economy is urgently
demanded. Unfortunately, one of the economies
which imposes the least self-denial on the majority is
the cessation of the purchase of objects of art. But
l; \i;i, CHELSEA GROUP!
AT THE LONDON MUSEUM
unequivocal superiority to the moderns. In engraving
the balance is against us ; line engraving is extinct,
stipple practically, and modern mezzotint is neither
so great in quantity nor so fine in quality as the
eighteenth-century work. Onlv in etching have we
greatly advanced. In ceramic art, cabinet-making,
and the work of the silversmith, we have got rid of
much of the bad taste of the Victorian era, and in
some directions have gone beyond the eighteenth-
century makers, yet on the whole the balance of
artistry is in their favour.
Taking one thing with another, however, the artistic
position occupied by England at the beginning of
the present war is analogous to that held by her at
the end of the eighteenth century. Her art com-
mands profound respect abroad as well as at home,
and in several departments of it — engraving, domestic
architecture, and the production of furniture and
ceramic ware — she leads the world. This position
[PHOTO W. E. GRAY
this, far from conserving the resources of the country,
tends in the long run only to diminish them. The
creation and the conservation of the beautiful together
form a vast industry on which both the present and
future commercial success of the nation largely hinges.
The artists who create art, and the dealers and col-
lectors who accumulate the treasures of the past,
originate the artistic taste which governs the design
of textiles, pottery and porcelain, metal-work, and
the thousand and one wares which are not merely
mechanical productions. Weaken and vitiate this
source and the future of half the industries in the
country is jeopardised. Something like this actually
occurred during the French war, and art to a great
extent became commercialised : its destinies fell from
the control of the people who practised and under-
stood it into the hands of people who were more
interested in making it a pecuniary success. One can
see this exemplified in the transfer of publishing from
War and British Art
the hands of engravers to individuals who had no
technical knowledge of the art. The brothers Boy-
dell, the brothers Ward. Green, Smith, and many
other of the leading eighteenth-century print-sellers,
were all practical engravers. The close of the war
saw their businesses either extinct or belonging if
laymen. The result was a general decline in the an
of engraving. A similar decline may be traced in
almost every other branch of art and artistic industry.
Tile taste of the country, which reached its nadir
in the mid- Victorian epoch, has gradually been re-
stored to its former level, with immense benefit to the
trade of the country.
Now, unless we are careful, there is every danger
of another decline in English taste. The people
who have devoted their lives to the pursuit and stud)
of art must receive adequate support, or else, as in
the case of their predecessors, their efforts will be
brought to a standstill, and, when the war is over, a
new generation arise ignorant of artistic tradition and
deficient in artistic knowledge.
In some respects the situation is far more perilous
than before, because, though the countrywas exhausted
in the Napoleonic struggle, it was less affected than
any other of tin great nations. At thi time
the wealthiest country in the world is not taking part
in the struggle at all, and unless the British public
ran give support to art dealers, it seems likely that a
large portion of tire treasures thej have ai cumulated
will be transferred to the other side of the Atlantic.
It must be remembered that money spent in British
art is not money lost to the country, but remains h< n
to the benefit of the whole nation. Artists and art
dealers have more than borne their share in tin
struggle, and many have ahead) given their li\'
their country, and it is the country's duty and lor the
country's profit to help those who remain in the task
i if upholding the cause of English culture.
THE INTERIOR 01
Mini
20I
,a »ai »ai » ,i i, it aim ,i »;>i »;.i »j.i »,.i»,^.i raw mnyi sxnxtxaji'nA fsija
V,v.'rfc^fc>'ffc\YfcVf»-:rk^>Yffc^ffcVf\Yffc.'fi^UYf^f^fV'f\^ffcvifcJf%'f\'ivJt»'f»,r\ i
'mmmw^^^^^^m^^^^^
NO. [.—MANTELPIECE OF CARVED PINE, FROM \ HOUSE IN CAREY STREET, LINCOLN'S INN FIELDS,
OF I1IE EARLY AND MIDDLE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY, RIVING THE TYPICAL DECORATION OF THE
FIREPLAI E
202
The Years of Mahogany Part XII. The Director Chippendale
(continued), being " The Gothick Taste'7 By Haldane Macfall
The next type of chair in the Director of
1754 is contained in plates xxi. and xxii.. under
"Gothick chairs." Of the chairs in plate xxi., we
notice that the backs are all '■ tilled in," that is to say.
that the design goes right
over the whole back, no
longer being contained in
the vase-shaped outline.
They are very ornate,
being much carved. The
"straight " (or "square ")
leg 1- not upi hi them all.
Whilst in plate xxii. the
three chairs, which are
repeated, by the way, in
the third edition, are of
mixed type, one being dis-
tinctly Chinese-( lothick.
( )l this more anon. But
co m pari ng these- two
plates « ith the two plati -•
in the third edition, it is
evident that Chippendale
only considered his chairs
"< lothick" when th.' back
was filled in with tin di
sign. The same remark
applies to his •■ ( Ihinese "
. as we shall see ;
but we shall also - < thai
once ( !hippendale got the
" ( lothick " intention into
NO. II. >IAHOGAN>
INC. I HE F1LLED-IN
IIGHT LER, AND I MAR
ITMENT Ol . .111.1, \k\I-, 17;
[.-ROM HIRE
his eye, he soon applied it to his "vase-shaped"
splits also, whether it was that the design took hold
of his mind and pushed his Fore-Director decorations
out of his favour, or that he did it of delibi
intention as a si irt of com-
promise. At the same
time, the decorati .1 vasi ■
splat of his earlier work,
and the " ( lothick " and
the " ( Ihinese " taste ol
his later fancy, became
so jumbled in his lust
for " vari et y," which he
vaunts again and again,
that he evolved a mixture
which, strange to say, bred
an uncommonly beautiful
design in his splats, .is
ti 1 « lin h it is sometimes
difficult to decide what
is "G ot In ck," what is
••( 'hinese," and what just
pure < Ihippendale 1
I think we would do
well not to lay too much
stress on the fact that the
••(lothick " goes before
"Chinese " in the
order of Chippi 1
book. 1 find it difficult
are any sort ol
sound evidence that he
201
The Connoisseur
AAAAAA!
No. III. MAI I. IG \NY G.OTHII K CHIPPENDALE CHAIR, Willi
FILLEI>-I\ BACK, AND THE PECULIAR ARMS, 1750-60
FROM TISSINGTOJJ HAIL, DERBYSHIRE
aimed at what he and his age took to be "Gothick"
before he was conquered by the "Chinese" taste. 1
fancy the order in the book has been responsible for
this dogma. But one or the other had to go first :
and I see no reason whatever for thinking that it was
anything but a toss-up. I should say, as a matter <>f
fact, that the two vogues came in much about the
same time. And that this is most likely seems to me
to be proved by the fact that the "straight square
I' l (the must marked part of the changes in the
Director from the work of the decades that went
beforci is essentially "Chinese," and has no roots in
the "Gothick" taste ; yet we find him applying it to
the " Gothick " chairs from the beginning. Indeed,
in plate xxii. the two types are distinctly mixed, and
it would be difficult to say whether the third chair —
which, by the way. in the third edition he repeats in
another plate of "Gothick " chairs — is "Gothick or
"Chinese," or either.
It is quite true that books were published on the
"Gothick " taste some years before those which were
concerned with the "Chinese' taste; but even here
we have no very great guide, since Chippendale and
all the other cabinet-makers seem to have used Indian
and Chines, designs without any distinction — prob-
ably thought them the same thing — and labelled them
--.-
lUUxAA/v
No. IV. — MAHOGANY GOTHICK CHIPPENDALE CHAIR,
WITH FILLED-IN RACK, 1750-60
FROM TISSINGTON HAI-L, DERBYSHIRE
as Chinese without hesitation. Nor did their concept
of the "Gothick " go much deeper.
However, let us see what Chippendale meant by
tin "Gothick" taste, just noting that the "straight
square leg" was not particularly "Gothick," but
"Chinese" (but we will discuss that detail more fully
when we come to the " Chinese " taste), and remem-
bering that in any case both the "Gothick" and the
"Chinese" were of the Dirertordeca.de of 1750-60,
and that the question as to which came fust is some-
what academic, and the controversy about it wholly
unprofitable and its deductions certainly very uncon-
vincing.
By 1750 evidently a Gothic vogue was in the air.
We know that Horace Walpole was smitten by the
bastard business, and he stood for extreme culture —
what is to-day called the " high-brow school." Horace
Walpole seems to have been a sort of authority mi
all the arts. He wrote on painting, on architecture,
on taste. There is a certain type of eminent person,
the "superior person," as our slang has it to-day, who
in every generation, for some God-forsaken reason,
seems to catch the public eye and is accepted for
scant reason as a demi-god and arbiter of taste. He
personifies the Philistinism of an age in a handsome
swagger; and the Philistines, being in the majority.
204
GEORGIANA COUNTESS SPENCER AND HER DAUGHTER LADY GEORGIANA,
AFTERWARDS DUCHESS OF DEVONSHIRE
In the collection of His Grace the Duke oj Devonshire, at Chats th
The ) 'cars of
Mahogany
No. V. — GOTHICK CHAIR, WITH FILLED-IN BACK, MADE
BY A CONTEMPORARY OF CHIPPENDALE, PROBABLY
MAINWARING, 1750-60
BY KINli PERMISSION OF I. YOUNG HUNTEI .
love to set up their demi-god fn mi amongst themselves.
It justifies them to themselves. And their demi-god
is avenged by the gods, for his name stands to the
next age as the elaborate bore of a dead time.
Horace Walpole was one of the most brilliant of these
curious freaks. They always need high social posiri< >n,
and Horace was the star in the high social firman
Strawberry Hill probably did more harm to archi-
tecture than the work of any man's hand. It •
a vogue in bastard Gothic that dominated the years
almost into our own generation. But his sin dai
the reputation of a man of really very fine parts mosl
unduly, though some of the damnation was certainly
■. ed.
Chippendale happened to be a man ol ran
,m<l by and through that immortal flame he purified
the hideous thing until,
he brought forth out of it some perfei I designs which
add to his stature as a gn .it craftsman.
Chippendale, as we have seen, was quick to leap
at a vogue; he leaped at th "Gothick"and
•■( 'liinese " taste as needle a
Now, what 1 ippendale's idea o! the
Gothic ? To think of tl Gothii
significance in an age whii h buill foi itsi H in a style
No. VI. -WALN1 I CHAIR O] CHIPPENDALE'S
" DIRECTOR :' DEI \ni . -11 i\\ !NG I III.
PINGS I IKING 1 IN DIS1 IN' I GO! HICK
IN TEN I ION, I-50 60
so suited to itself buildings like the Horse Guards
and Dover House, in Whitehall, is of course im-
possible. But the Walpole-G vas impossible.
What exactly was Chippendale's idea of the "Gothick
is not always easy to discover. Wren had had a shot
at the Gothic. Batty Langley had no small share in
starting a vogue of bastard "Gothick" architectun
about 1747 with his volume entitled Got/tick Arc/n
tecture Improved by Rules and Proportions. By wbom-
• started, the tracer) of Gothic windows, and
perhaps ol Gothic chests, with the pointed arch, the
tatrefoil, the chamfi bevelled)
moulding, the triple column, and such -like details,
had come to stand for "Gothick."
I lowever. tile pseudo-Coil: 1 Ight th<
1 the town to
and "Gothick" it had to be. So < hippenda
the naval folk say — "n - ven whilst
d .n the vogue of Walpole-Gothick, why the
legs should have been straight and
the "Gothick ly Chippendale could say, and
obabl) was not quite sure — at any rate, 1;
ay. But it wai i s, the
one arising out of the other : that the " I
ming in li he "( rothick," it not
VV/r Connoisseur
i unning it neck to
neck, was bring-
ing in the straighi
leg; the ot he r
due in the fact
that it would
make for a wider
circle of clients
if Chippendal e
catered t < > a
tendency for sim-
plicity in the part
of the chair which
w as not in u c h
seen, such as the
legs, in order to
enhance the
i laborate " ( loth-
ick " of the back
and upper part of
the seat that did
show.
This "Gothick"
took on very
elaborate forms,
which ran on one
side towards the
Chippendale
strappings and
slats so pierced
as to be suggestive
of cathedral win-
dows, and on the
other side into
the "Chinese"
taste, as we shall
presently see.
Some of it was an
abomination even
in Chippendale's hands, which clearly had no wide
vogue, since the specimens are grown rare — fortu-
nately. But one thing is worth noting : in the Director
the "Gothick" designs, in spite of the straight leg,
have no stretchers, whilst all other straight legs are
stretchered.
The "pure Gothick" evidently did not "catch
on" — the specimens are very tare. But there was
one feature of the " pure Gothick " which Chippendale
retained and used freely in these and after years — the
"cluster-column" leg. When one comes upon the
cluster-column leg, whether on chair or table or bed,
one may be certain that the piece is of the Director
years.
As I have said, the so-called Chippendale "fretted"
No. VII. — MAHOGANY CHIPPENDALE I HAIR OF ABOUT 1750, IN
WHICH THE STRAPPINGS INSWER fO \ DISTINCT GOTHICK INTENTION
chairs range over
his Chinese and
< lothic taste, as
well as over his
own "vase-splats,"
and through the
whole of his career
— so that the
phrase helps us
little. The"square;
leg," the square
straight leg, is
quite another
affair— it dates the
chair at once. It
was cheaper than
the cabriole to
make ; it left the
showy parts of the
chair where they
were most seen ;
it brought good
furniture within
the reach of a wide
public; and it
caught the town.
It seems to have
overwhelmed al-
most at once the
cabriole - legged
designs except for
the houses of
the wealthy, and
e v e n h e r e w e
find some of the
finest specimens
in great houses
111 a d e with the
straight leg.
The "(lothick," in its "pure" form, Chippendale
soon found hopeless; but with his wonted skill he
was soon applying what "Gothick" was in him — the
best of it — to the splat of his ordinary chair, whether
cabriole-legged and claw - and - ball footed, for his
wealthier patrons, or "straight square legged" for the
world and his wile in general. And we shall notice
the accent of his " Gothick " taste throughout the
rest of his career within the limits of this vase-shaped
splat — difficult as it is at times to separate it from
his "strappings" of the Fore-Director years or from
his "Chinese" intention, but this difficulty should
not discourage us, since Chippendale himself was not
precisely sure where his "Chinese" and "Gothick"
taste usurped each other's boundaries, as he proves
208
The Years of Mahogany
NO. VIII.— u \1 M I I HIPPENDALE I HAIR, THE
SPLAT DEFINITELY GOTHICK, 1750-60
IN THE POSSESSION OF THE STATIONERS' COMPANY
No. IX. — ARMCHAIR OF 1111 SAME, 1750-60
IN THE POSSESSION 0] Mil- STATIONERS'
1 1 IMPANY
by putting markedly Chinese decoration into his
"Gothick" plates. And, as a matter of fact, neither
the Gothic nor his Chinese were very clear to his
mind — they were vague forms which he translated
into designs which we had best always remembi r as
"Chippendale Gothick '' and "Chippendale Chin
It is enough for us — and all its value lies therein —
that the "Gothick" intention, so far as Chippendale
understood Gothic, did give to Chippendale certain
forms and lines for the splats of his chairs, during
these years, that were very beautiful. The somi what
incoherent arrangements of his "strappings" and
curves in the splats oi tin- Fort Director years, with
their disjointed meetings and vague design, gave way
to .1 sort of architectural cohesion which made of the
splats a unity and in i i arvi d with .1 perfection never
surpassed in the decoration of furniture. And the
student may be sure that when a Chippendale 1 ha
particularly in its splat, shows this coherent di
whether it obviously suggests the tracery ol ;i Gothii
window, or whether it be a consistent upward di
from the se.it to thi 1 I -v top-rail, that that
chair is of Chippendali - Director '-.its. It plao
definite a barm- between work ol this decade and
work oi" tip Fori Din . which pri
that once our attention is drawn to it, we cannot help
but realise it. When, in addition, we get the "squan
leg, the date is obvious. But we must remember
that the square leg also shows that th< / D rector
splat was still used by Chippendale for chairs of the
Director decade.
It should be noticed that the ■•bracket" at the
angle where the square leg joins the underside of the
seat-rail (which "angle-bracket " used to In the sole
grounds tor the dealers in the years gone by for
labelling the chail as a " Mainwai ing " chair) was
used by Chippendali occasionally on his straighl-
;ged chairs in the "( lothick " taste (as well as ofti n
used by him in the" ( 'hint se " taste 1 : and tin Director
shows it in one or two of his essi ntial designs for the
\ . a matter < 0 tell a < Ihippendale from a
Mainwaring — indeed, from the work ol several ma
1 tune —is rather a matter ol" artistic instinct than
an affair in which on. can lay down very definite
laws; and a good deal of the demi-goddish authority
vaunl ome writers on furniture is sheer guess-
I titi 0 1 1 finitely " stylish "
about everything that Chip] did that marks
his domination. B ;ards many of the chairs
:oo.
The Connoisseur
NO. X. — THE CHARTERHOUSE CHIPPENDALE
l HAIR, THE GOTHICK STILL IMPLICIT IN THE
SPLAT, BUI ['HE TRACERY MORE CARVED,
1750-60 FROM THE CHARTERHOUSE
which I have called Chippendale in the.se articles, I
wish to say here and now that I use the title as mean-
ing that Chippendale's designs prompted the making
of them rather than that they were all actually made
in his workshops. Where other makers of the period
tried "creations,'' as the dressmaker's slang has it,
their work is so much poorer in concept and design
that it is not worth while considering it ; but where
a really good maker produces a fine design that is
worthy to rank beside Chippendale's, I will at some
early date try to do justice to him, if his design be
definitely personal. But every town of any importance
had its local cabinet-maker — and the chair, the cup-
board, the table, and the sideboard would be his
chief efforts ; above all the chair — we can therefore
but call the work of such men " country Chippendale "
or ''Irish Chippendale " where Chippendale's plates
and books were the plans upon which such designs
were wrought.
As regards the " stitched-up," or, as it is sometimes
also called, the "nailed'' upholstered seat, and the
"drop-in" seat, I'nth forms persisted, evidently in
answer to the taste of the patron, during this decade.
The seats which are hollowed out from side to
side, dropping in the centre from the level of the
straight sides, or, as they are sometimes called, the
X.'. XI. — I1IE CHARTERHOUSE CHIPPENDALE
ARMCHAIR OF THE SAME -II,
1750-00
FROM THE CHARTERHOUSE
"scooped" seats, are generally said by writers on
furniture to have been of the fashion from 1755 to
1770: and though I find Cescinsky, who is the finest
authority on our English furniture of this age, inclined
to accept this dictum, I am bound to say that I have
never yet seen the least proof of a convincing kind to
show that they were made on chairs of this Director
decade ; and in my own experience of chairs — for
what it may be worth — I have invariably found the
" scooped " 01 "hollowed" seat on chairs ofa markedly
. Ifier-Director date, as shown by the type of the backs,
that is to say, on chairs of from 1760 or 1765. But
I will deal with this when we come to the decade.
But I want to keep the student's mind on the
Director decade untroubled and unconfused by later
developments at this stage, since, as the wag said,
" sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof." And
we are about to examine the most vital influence upon
Chippendale's genius in this decade — that "Chinese"
taste which led him to the development of that style
with which his name is associated by the " man in
the street," though the writers on the subject have, for
some strange reason, never quite fully understood
what evolved the "rococo " and the "Chinese taste-
in this age — indeed, openly express their bewilderment
about it. This puzzlement is due to not paying
Tin • Years of Mahogany
NO. XII. MAHOGANY CHIPPENDALE CHAIR,
IN WHICH THE srl.AI SHOWS I 1 1 K GOTHICK
IK VERY, I75O-60
No. XIII.— MAHOGANY CHIPPENDALE CHAIR, Mil'.
5P1 VI SHOWING THE GOTHICK DESIGN, MORE
CARVED; THE STRAIGH1 LEGS GROOVED, 1750-60
sufficient attention to Chippendale's obvious respect
for the vogue in the "French" taste; or, it' this be
realised, it is due to our writers on our native furni-
ture not fully understanding the art movements in
fiance at this time and the resulting effect upon the
crafts. This lack of grasp is, however, very natural,
since the French taste, like all foreign influences "I
the preceding generations, came to England to a
people who have always been so personal (the cynics
would say "so insular") that we have always com
pelled 1 I1.1t outside influence into our own terms i ven
whilst we usurped it. After all, as I have shown,
Chippendale so distorted it into the native vision
when he filched the ideas of his own long-passed-
away native " Gothick," so il will easily be undei itood
thai he did not hesitate to do it with the "French"
taste.
I eivc as frontispiei e to this article a fine specimen
of a mantelpiece typical of the first hall of this
century. It is obvious that Chippendale's furniture
would go superbl) and fittingly with the design ol
this tine work. It goes equally without saving that
the designs in the "Gothick" taste did not, and
could not, go well with it. Chippendale never once
1 funis to he ,1 creator — an inventor of design: he-
dwells always on improving design. His designs, as
he claims, are "calculated to improve and refine the
public taste." Note that he accepts the styles and
tastes in vogue, but he does claim to "improve and
refine " them. Tin- brothers Adam, and Sheraton and
Hepplewhite, did i/ivent designs; Chippendale had
no such ambition. He did not invent the '" Gothick "
or the "Chinese" taste. And whilst he jumped at
the "Gothick" vogue, his tasteful eye soon turned
him from it. Bui there was tin-, g I even in his
falling away from righteousness, that he " improved "
the "< lot hick "out of all GothickneSS, and at the same-
time beautified his own design by the added flow of
form . which he look from the "Gothick " in order to
give coherence and unity to what before had often
been disjointed, even whilst he concealed its ills-
jointedneSS under the perfection of this carving.
The vogue foi Walpoli Gothick was a mere anti-
quarian's museum mania. Horace Walpole was an
inveterate collector. We have Macaula; cont< mptu-
011 s description of the museum thai Horace Wa
called a home at the famous abortion known .1-.
Strawberry Hill. Hut before we touch upon that, let
us remembi i thai < Chippendale was a man of genius
and taste; Horace Walpole merely a brilliant anti-
quarian. < Ihippendale did not understand the ( iothic ;
he was not an educated man — he was iianklv the
The Connoisseur
shopman of his age. He did not understand em
mi art to know that the heavy weight of massi
stone (where the builder aims at exquisite delicai \ of
tracery in stone) demands arches and architectural
had submitted to the vogue a few times and found
that it was not good.
But Horace Walpole? Well, glance at the picture
of Strawberry Hill. Horace Walpole, like the greatly
No
XIV.— MAHOGANY CHIPPENDALE ARMCHAIR, THE DEEPLY CARVED TRACERY SHOWING
THE GOTHICK INTENTION, 1750-60
tonus that answer stress and strain: but that these
forms are alien to wood, which is a wholly different
material, taking stress and strain in a wholly different
way from stone : and what was more', a chair, for
instance, does not come under the laws of stress
and strain that are innate in a building. But Chip-
pendale did know and did understand the basic
essential lines of a chair — as his Director proves —
and tile genius of the man, whilst the shopman in
him tried to profit by a vogue, forbade him to de-
bauch the essential foundations of his craft after he-
rich who posed for taste and refinement — or, as Sir
Herbert Tree wittily puts it. " refainement " — was a
victim of the Grand Tour. To travel abroad, to chip
a piece from the nose of the Sphinx or Cleopatra's
needle, collect a phial of water from the Dead Sea
or "the fragment of a Russian General" from the
bleached jaw-bone of a jackass in the desert, to see-
the pictures in Florence or Rome, and to write a
dreary book about it all on the return home, was the
" thing to do " in every great house. It established the
supreme "refainement." It was for half a century
TJie Years of Mahogany
later to be a universal vice. But no man so splendidly
embodied it as Horace Walpole. He collected e\ ery-
thing. In the mid-century of the seventeen-hundreds
be started in England the"Gothick" revival. He
shrank from no expense. He built Strawberry Hill,
"that trumpery piece of ginger-bread Gothic," with
'•piecrust battlements" and "pinnacles of lath and
plaster," with mantelpieces reproduced from tombs
in Westminster Abbey and Canterbury Cathedral —
the very shovels being eccentricities — every room a
museum. The fascinating Horace himself seem to
have been given to strutting amidst his old curiosity
shop in Van Dyck array. And when we think of the
"Gothick" gloom and horrors of the place, it is small
wonder that the French An a the
house, took off his hat with i> renci though he
entered a holy place.
Vet Horace Walpole's "Gothick" was lively stun
compared with the Victorian "( lothick" and mediaeval
"renaissance" of our boyhood, when the very chests
looked as if they held the dead, ami sorrow tilled
the land.
NO. XV. inio.n; VRMCHAIR, THE CARVED I'l.AT SHOWING THE*G [CK INFI.UI
i BY \ CONTEMl'i IR M \ "1 I III! I ENDA1 I '-, 1 760
-M ',
Collecting Antique China and Pottery Dogs
By Mrs. Kate Villiers Clive
Should any of my readers be anxious to
make a collection of small articles of value, they
cannot do better than turn their attention to the
accumulation of antique china and pottery dogs.
This collection would have many charms, as being
not only varied and ornamental, but also one that
many of us could afford. A great number of people
love the relics of bygone days and yet have too
slender purses to be able to spend large sums on
their hobby. Antique china and pottery have so
increased in value of late years that prices are now
very high, and where one used to buy in shillings,
one now has to spend pounds. I think this will be
the case more than ever when the troublous times
we are now going through are passed. Belgium
alone was a country rich in articles of vertu of all
kinds, and I fear most of these have been destroyed,
or, what is worse, fallen into the hands of the enemy.
China and earthenware dogs (except the very large
and unique specimens) can often still be bought
quite cheaply, but this will not be the case much
longer. Small pieces of china are always more sought
after than the large by the ordinary collector, on
account of so many of us not having space to
accommodate the latter. This is another charm of
the antique dog. Of course, the very early specimens
No. I.— STAFFORDSHIRE FIGURES: SPORTSMEN AND THE LOST SHEEP
-14
. I iitique China and Pottery
Dogs
made by Astbury, Whieldon, etc., are now seldom to
be met with, and I do not think even to be procured
at a low figure. When one does come across one,
he is always an animal of such quaint design, and so
extremely tight, and had round the base the well-
known fern design so often found on pieces made
by this factory. Its price was in accordance with
its si/e. so, alas! I had to leave it, to be bought, I
No. II.
-POINTER AND SETTER
ATTRIBUTED TO DERBY
unlike any dog one has ever seen, that it is hard to
say whether he is meant for a dog at all. He is often
much more like a sheep. These early potters seem
to have preferred to reproduce the cat, and one sees
specimens of these in museums and good private
collections. Chelsea made a few good dogs, but of
small size, and generally grouped with other figures.
The pug was their favourite model, and I once saw
a marked pair of these, and only wish I could have
possessed them.
Ralph Wood and his successors were fond of intro-
ducing the dog into their groups, and in association
It was worthy < >i
suppose, by some rich American,
a place in any museum.
No. ii. represents another very unique group, but
I should attribute this to the Derby works. As will
be seen, the setter and pointer are working, and
(what, unfortunately, does not show in the photo) a
pheasant is standing on the other side of the tuft of
ferns. This group is also of large size and of fine
quality.
I consider Wood and Caldwell were about the
first potters who made really pleasing dogs, and
No. iii. show-, a pair of these. The modelling and
No. III.— PAIR OF SPORTING DOGS
BY WOOD AND CA] DWELL
with their single figures (example, the lost sheep and
sportsmen in No. i.), but seldom, if ever, does one
see one alone. Some fine ones were produced al
Leeds, and a short time ago I saw one which
undoubtedly was made there. This was a model , ,i
a setter, and of a large si/e, for it measured eighteen
inches from nose to tail. In spile of this, it was
colouring of both is so true to life, and on the stands
are those charming touches ol pale blue so charac-
teristic of their work. One sees man idants
ol these delightful creatures nowadays in d< i
shops, but they have ^o deteriorated that one would
scarcely know them. ["he greyhound, instead of
being the pale grey and white of his irs, has
The Connoisseur
ie a tin 1 1 reddish colour, and while he reposed made dogs, but I consider Worcester and Rockmg-
on a restful green plinth, representing grass and ham are answerable for the best specimens. Derby
ferns, he now lies in a must unnatural position on a was also fund of the dog, and many of the poodles
NO. IV. — WORCESTER POODLE
crude blue base, that most terrible shade of bright one meets with came from there. This little gentle-
blue so popular in Victorian days. The setter has man has, I suppose, been collected more than any
equally suffered at the hand of time. other, with the usual result that the antique shops
I think practically all the old porcelain works are flooded with modern reproductions; so beware.
NO. V.— PAIR OF STAFFORDSHIRE POODLES AND A ROCK INCH AM EXAMPLE
2 I 6
For Our Wounded Soldiers.
BARKER'S
Wheel -About
Chair.
EXTRA STRONGLY MADE
MODERATE IX COST
COMFORTABLE TO USE
EASY TO MOVE
RUBBER-TYRED WHEELS
This Chair has been specially constructed
at a very moderate price, to meet the
present demand tor an inexpensive Wheel
Chair for our Wounded Soldiers. EACH
REGD.
SPECIAL PRICE
£2:5:0
THOUSANDS OF THESE CHAIRS WILL BE REQUIRED. CAN WE
SEND ONE OR MORE TO YOUR LOCAL NURSING HOME?
MANUFACTURED ONLY BY
JOHN BARKER & Co., Ld.
Kensington, London, W
The Connoisseur
oi that epoch, he is often quite ornamental. No. ix.
gives a few examples. Most of them are of pottery,
and the model of the pointer outside his kennel (by
as a type of beauty. Many a mantelpiece is orna-
mented (?) by a pair of these creatures, and they
are most commonly white in colour with brown spots.
No. VIII. — fAIR OF STAFFORDSHIRE PEGGING POODLES
the way, it is more like a house than a kennel) is
a charming ornament. The two midget spaniels
outside theirs is also attractive. I do not consider
the late Victorian dog is worthy of a place in any
collection. He is usually large in size, coarse in
make, and generally unpleasing. The King Charles
spaniel is the most favourite subject, and I think
it shows the want of taste of the age to choose him
Round their necks are yellow collars (we can scarcely
call it gilt : it is not worthy the name) with chains
attached.
Should any of my readers feel inspired by this
article to collect antique china dogs, I only hope
his pleasure in doing so will be as great as mine
has been. "No time like the present" is an old
saying, and in this case a very true one.
No. IX. — some EXAMPLES OF MID-VICTORIAN POTTERY DOGS
■18
GIRL TAKING COFFEE
FROM THE ENGRAVING BY LOUIS MARIN
OTEsf
bucmej
[T/ie Editor invites the assistance of readers of The Connoisseur who may be able to impart the
information required by Correspondents?^
Unidentified Painting (No. iSS).
Dear Sir, — I beg to enclose a photograph of an
oil-painting which I believe may be attributed to
the Italian school, and seems to me that it may
have been painted by Giulio Romano, who was a
favourite pupil of Raphael. I shall be glad to hear
il you can make any other suggestion as to its origin.
The measurements of the canvas are 2 ft. 8 in. by
3 ft- 3l in-
Yours faithfully, Iv/AN GOLDSCHMIDT.
Unidentified Painting (No. 189).
Dear Sir, — As a regular subscriber to your
esteemed magazine, 1 take the liberty of enclosing
lien with a photi 1 1 il
an old oil-painting
in my possessn in,
and shall be greatly
obliged if you or
some nf your read-
ers would favour me
with any information
n garding the sub-
ject and the name
of the artist. The
painting is on oak
panel, 56 in. by
40 in. The dealer
at ( lopenhagen, who
sold it to me a few
years ago, attributed
it to a Dutch or
Flemish fourteenth
to fifteenth century
painter, H. van
1< oyme rswa hli n,
called " M a 1 1 nus,
bul I have been
unable to ascertain
whet h er this is
correct. The said 18S
dealer also told me he had it from a Russian cus-
tomer, and that there should be at the Hermi
in Petrograd a painting the subject of which beats
a strong resemblance to that on the enclosed photo,
excepting, however, that the child, si en at the bottom
of same, is excluded.
Yours faithfully, P. C>. Thulin
(Ital. v. Consul, Stockholm).
Unidentified Painting (No. 190).
Dear Sir, — The enclosed photo is of an oil-
painting executed on three oak panels, and si
"S. Franckif." The date is not quite clear, but
appears to be either 1592 or 1602'. The colon:
very rich, and the
pa inting is more
like enamel than
ordinary paint. I
shall esteem your
kindness if von will
let me know if there
isanyinten stattach
ing to the picture,
The measurements
an ; it. 3 in. long
by 2 ft. 3 in. high.
Yours truly,
thos. < '. \ < rner.
Unidj \ 1
Pain
(N0.19] 1.
1 )ear Sir, — 1 1 n
close you .1 photo
of .1 picture 1 •
ing lo a I 1 iend 1 >\
mine that ha
:<• my not
1. 1 paint-
ing, about 24 in.
sntified painting °) i8in.,or perhaps
221
The Connoisseur
30 in. by 20 in., but wry finely finished. (Jan you
possibly throw any light upon the matter? Is this
an original or likely to be, or is it a copy?
Yours faithfully, J. Shaw Tomkins.
very old and in first-class preservation. Of course,
I know that it is only a connoisseur that can
really give an opinion correctly, and so I ask you
to kindly help me in the matter.
(189)
UNIDENTIFIED TAINTING
Unidentified Painting (No. 192).
Sir, — I hope you will pardon me thus taking the
liberty of writing you, but I do so on the advice of
the Director and Secretary of our Art Society. I
have had a picture in my possession for some time,
Any information your readers can give me as to
whether it is an original or only a copy I shall be
extremely obliged for.
Yours faithfully,
George H. Davey (Sydney, N.S.W.).
(190)
UNIDENTIFIED l'AINTING
and my own impression is that it is really a good
work.
The picture is 5 ft. 6 in. by 4 ft. 2 in. There is
no mark or writing on it, so far as I can see, to
indicate its age or authorship, but I am sure it is
Unidentified Miniature (No. 193).
Dear Sir, — I shall be greatly obliged if any of your
readers can assist me in identifying the subject of a
miniature in my possession which is painted on ivory,
and signed " Harding Pinxt." — Yours truly, J. Y. R.
Notes and Queries
Unidentified Miniature (No. i8i), June, 1915.
Dear Sir,— With reference to the above, while
being unable to identify the sitter, I have no doubt
It is well known amongst connoisseurs that Engle-
heart's likenesses are distinctive for the prominence
accorded to the eyes of the subject, as being th
(191)
UNIDEN 1TKIKH P ilNTINI
whatever that the painting is the work of George
Engleheart (1752 - 1829), who executed an extra-
ordinary number of portraits of important personages,
by which he acquired a great reputation. He occu-
pied th'- position of miniature painter to George III.
of expression, and his draughtsmanship, whilst refined
and graceful, is remarkable for its thoroughness. His
name must not be confounded with that of his nephew
and pupil, J. C. Dillman Engleheart, whose style is in-
finitely inferior. Engleheart senior was both born and
(192) UNIDENTIFIED PAIN I ING
--3
The Connoisseur
bu r i t- d at K e w, and
■ everal fine works from
his hand have been dis-
covered in the Thames
\ alley. His miniatures
on ivory are held in high-
er esteem than those- on
enamel. The portrait in
i [uestion appears to be
an excellent specimen
oft he former, both
pretty and pleasing,
which should enhance
its value.
Yours faithfully,
Alfred Painter.
Rembrandt's
" Betr.w \i
(July, 19 15).
Sir, — I cannot answer
your enquirant's letter
respecting Tlie Price oj
the Betrayal, o f Rem-
brandt, with great exacti-
tude. It presumptively
refers to the painting in oils of Judas bringing Inn!; the
thirty pieces of silver to the High Priest, painted about
1628-30, in which figures of medium size are arranged
on canvas of 31^ in. by 40 ,'■'„ in. Emile Michel, mem-
ber of the Institut of France, in his valuable book on
Rembrandt, published in 1895 by William Heinemann,
gives the pedigree to this picture. "Collection of M.
Harot, domiciled in France, from Fanshawe, Terrour,
and Lord Northwick collections." If there is another
picture of the Betrayal, I do not know it.
Yours sincerely, C. Van Plus.
Hardwick Hall.
Dear Sir, — It has been suggested to me that Mary
Queen of Scots, who was beheaded 1111587, could never
have been imprisoned or detained at the presenl
Hardwick Hall, since it was erected in 1590-97. This
is on the authority of Ford's History of Chesterfield,
published in 1838. Unfortunately the first half of the
nineteenth century was not always remarkable for the
scientific treatment of architectural questions, although
there were contemporaries who explicitly believed in
(193)
the story of Mary's de-
tention at the house in
question. Modern au-
thorities, who are infinite-
ly more reliable, plai 1
the period of erection as
1576, which makes avast
difference to the case.
I take this opportunity
of Ci irrectinga slip of the
pen which might prove
embarrassing to the
novice. When writing
of Chatsworth and Old-
cotes in the same note,
I gave out that both of
them "are due to the
same ' Be ss of Hard-
wick. This error is
sufficiently palpable to
merit some degree of
commiseration, for the
merest tyro could not
profess to regard the pre-
sent Chatsworth as an
IIFIED MINIATURE ,,,• , tl ,„»:„„
Elizabethan erection,
whilst the name of Oldcotes is to be numbered amongst
the past glories of our English countryside.
Yours faithfully, Latham Burton.
Portrait of David Garrick.
An interesting portrait of David Garrick gazing at
a Medallion Head of Shakespeare was reproduced as
one of our plates in the June issue. This work has
been regarded generally as being by John Zoffany, R. A.,
whose name as a depictor of the great actor will occur
to every reader. A correspondent writes to say, how-
1 ver, that the portrait in question is from the brush
of Van der Gucht, and represents Garrick in the
capacity of Steward of the Stratford Jubilee. In any
1 ase, the artistic value of the picture is undoubted as
a tvpical specimen of eighteenth-century art.
Note.
Will Mary C. Ellsworth, of Charleston, U.S.A.,
kindly send her full address, as the owner of the
portrait No. 163 (January and April, 1915) wishes to
communicate with her.
224
The Sydney
Collection :
Pictures
THE sale of the Sydney collection by Messrs. Knight,
Frank and Rutley opened at Frognal on June ~th. The
dispersal of the collection, and the
sale of the estate later in the
season, breaks the connection of this
district with an ancient family who
have been in occupation of Frognal for many genera-
tions. Sir Richard Bettinson, an ancestor of the late
owner, bought the estate, about the time of the Restora-
tion, from Sir Thomas Walsingham, a lineal descendant
of the famous Sir Thomas Walsingham, Secretary to
Oueen Elizabeth, whose family held the property for
245 years. Sir Francis Walsingham's daughter married
Sir Philip Sydney, who fell at Zutphen. The first day
of the sale was concerned with the old family and other
portraits. A Portrait Group, in a landscape, of Lords
Robert, Thomas, Yere. Montagu Bertie, and Thomas
Farrington, Esq., by Zoffany, 38 in. by 48 in., brought
£273; a three-quarter length of Thomas, tst Viscount
Sydney, by (Albert Stuart, 33 in. by 27 in.. /136 10s. ;
a half-length of Miss MarsJiam, by Gainsborough, 29 in.
by 24 in., /j, 600; and a half-length of Thomas, 1st Vis-
count Sydney, by Gilbert Stuart, 29 in. by 24 in., which was
exhibited at the National Portrait Gallery, 1867, /'189.
Other prices of importance were a Landscape Portrait
Group of Sir Robert Walpole, in green hunting costume,
n. a hunter, and hounds, by John Wootton,
60 in. by 55 in., .£'294: a half-length of The Hon. Mrs.
Titos. Townshend, daughter of Col. Selwyn, by J. Wyck,
29 in. by 24 in., ,£94 10s. ; a half-length of .•/ Youth of
the Bettinson Family, with a painted oval surround in
the Grinling Gibbons style, by Sir Peter Lely, 20 in. by
24 in., /i">S 10s. The first day's sale closed with three
interesting lots, which were a half-length oijohn Thomas,
2nd Viscount Sydney, by George Romney, 29 in. by
24 in., £787 10s. : a half-length of Geor vn, the
well-known wit, by Sir Joshua Reynolds, 29 m. bj 24 in.,
which was exhibited at the V>' rait Exhibition,
and at the Royal Academy Exhibition of Old
: ^, 1S80, £735 ; and a three-quarter length Portrait
of tin- Artist, by Madame Vigee le Brun, 1782. 44 in. by
34 in., which realised the high sun 130. This
picture was presented to Earl Sydney by the Empress
Eugenie in memory of her son, the Prince Imperial.
On the second day of sale a further selection of pictures
came under the hammer. A / > 54 in.
by 24 in., realised £52 10s. It will be remembered that
the place was named after that Earl Sydney who was
Secretary of State at the Home Office when it was
covered. Shortly after the last lot, a Landscape, with
a distant view of Gloucester and tin- S,r,rn. 30 in. by
44 in., fetched /50 8s. : and a Landscape, with a
of Eton College, by William Harlow, 24 m. by 36 in.,
i-i 2S.
1 in the third day of sale, June 9th, the silver
under the hammer, when a set of three plain octagonal
muffineers, thread bands, cre>t. maker's
SiIver mark A. T., 1732, 8} in. high, weight
.. fetched /130 10s.; an octagonal plain 1
shaped teapot, 1715. 14 oz. 18 dwt., /"104 6-,. ; a similar
teapot, 1716, 14 oz. 2 dwt., /S4 12s. ; anil a set of four
circular salt-cellars, raised leaf ornament and acanthus
border, 1729, maker's mark I. S., 260/. 4dwt.. £78 12s.
Presented by George III. and Queen Charlotte to the
Hon. Miss < ieorgina Townshend, and bearing the royal
monogram, was the set of six oval-shaped d
1 borders, 19 in., 171 in., two 13J in. and 12 in.
Ctively, maker'-- mark B. L., 1782. 195 oz.. which
ed £195. A set of sixty - six Georgian and
William I V. silver meat and soup plates, with gadroon
borders and the Townshend crest, i,o8g o 7 dwt.,
dates 170; to 1834, was knocked down for £531 : whilst
a set of four tluted candlesticks, 12 in. high, and
of two-light scroll branches, with centre vase for same,
Townshend crest, circular base--, thread bon 1
1 s mark I. S., 148 oz. iS dwt. gross , bn
ami a ( leorge III. plain tea-kettle, with engraved border,
. _; dwt., £&4 1 7-.
The engravings were dispersed in the secoi
of the second day's sale on June 8th. The prio
were not of suffii ienl important -
engravings warrant a detailed statement, but
■ 1 1 In two folli 'i\ ing l<
' liatiiam, in state robes, by
npton, which brought £30 9s. : ami
Tin- lit. Hon. Lord Hood, Admiral of the Blue, full
length, in uniform, by Valentim I.. F.
Abbott. £21.
The Connoisseur
The fourth day's sale of the Sydney collection opened
on June ioth with a selection of
old weapons, when a pair of
antique engraved steel and brass duelling pistols realised
£ i oi> i 5.
The library was put up to auction on June 14th, 15th,
and 16th, being the sixth, seventh, and eighth days of
sale. A first edition of the Great
s Nuremberg Chronicle, with fine im-
pressions of the woodcuts, and containing all the blank
leaves and the account of Sarmacia, often missing, orig.
oak boards covered with stamped leather, 1493, £25 ;
Journal of the House of Lords, from vol. i.. 1509, to
vol. cxix.. 1885, Appendix, 7 vols., etc., 12 vols., in all
140 vols., folio, half calf, £25 2s. ; and L'urtis's Botanical
Magazine, complete from commencement in 1787 to
188S, in 94 vols., roy. Svo, half calf, and 16 numbers of
1889 and '90, £64.
nther prices were Piranesi's Opere varie di Architet-
tura Prospettive Grotteschi Antichita, So splendid Roman
impressions of the etchings, including the scarce series
of 16 large folding plates of Carceri, fol., half calf, 1750,
£25 4s. ; and Beaumont and Fletcher's Comedies and
Tragedies, 1st collected edition, edited by John Chierly,
containing 36 plays printed for the first time, with por-
trait of Fletcher by Marshall, fol. orig. calf, gilt back,
fine tall copy, 1647, ,£26. Shortly afterwards two notable
lots came under the hammer. A fine Book of Hours.
14th-century MS. on vellum, 8A in. by 5J in., finely
written in Gothic letter, with 45 large and beautiful
miniatures, was bound up with a 16th-century Service
of Prayer, with calendar of Saints' Days, with 18 large
and most beautiful miniatures, written on 220 leaves of
fine vellum, with marginal decorations of grotesques
illuminated in gold and colours, bound in boards covered
in old red velvet, realised .£813 15s. The fly-leaves of
this interesting item are rilled with registers of the Tuke
and other families, forerunners of the Townshends, and
an inscription states that "This Booke was the handie
work of Walter Cromer followinge : Dr. of phisick to
King Henrie the 8.'' The next lot was a beautiful
15th-century MS. Hon,-, of the English use, written on
in leaves of vellum, 8 in. by 5! in., with 22 large and
beautifully executed miniatures in gold and colours of
the martyrdom of St. Thomas of Canterbury, etc., and
other illuminations, bound in rough leather, which
fetched ,£60.
On the ninth day of sale, June 17th, a series of inter-
esting works concerning America and the Colonies came
under notice. Linschoten, His Discours of Voyages into
ye Easte and West Indies, infoure Books, complete with
copper-plate frontispiece, the 6 large folding maps and
6 small in text, a fine tall and unique copy, fol., contemp.
calf, from the library of James I., with his arms in
centre, lion rampant at angles on sides, in fine preserva-
tion, 1 598, brought ,£63. The Atlantic Neptune : 1
of' the Coast and Harbours in the uit/ph and Riv
St. Lawrence, etc., etc., "from surveys taken by Major
Holland, Surveyor-General of the Northern District ot
North America, . . . 1765-8, for the use of the Royal
Navy of Great Britain, by J. F. W. I>es Barres, 1770-80,"
with upwards of 80 large elephant fol. folding maps, etc.,
and [3 full-page views in sepia, of which 4 are finely
coloured by hand, and 96 smaller views in sepia, etc.,
of which 45 are also beautifully coloured by hand to
look like miniatures, 109 illustrations in all, 2 vols.,
elephant fol. (two or three maps and one or two views
damaged, otherwise in fine condition), realised ,£295.
On June 17th, the ninth day of sale, the MSS. and
autographs came under the hammer. The Sydney
correspondence included many in-
Autographs teresting items. The lot which
contained documents relating to the American War of
Independence realised ,£28 "s. ; whilst the important
collection relating to Ireland, upwards of 200 documents,
and chiefly of the years 1782 to 1789, only brought ^22.
Nearly 100 letters and papers dealing with America, in-
cluding a number of letters from Governor Shirley, were
knocked down for ^50 8s. ; and ^42 was the highest bid for
a wooden box containing about 250 miscellaneous docu-
ments relating to the British Colonies, including India,
Canada, Nova Scotia, West Indies, etc. An important
holograph letter of Lord Chatham, 3 pp. 4to, undated,
but headed " Hayes, Tuesday night," brought ,£60 1S3.
The writer says : " Finding that the Doom against
America is to be pronounced from the Treasury Bench,
perhaps in a few hours, it will be too late to attempt
preventing a Civil War, after it is once inevitably fix t.
this unhappy exigency leaving no option. I must speak
or for ever hold my tongue," etc. An interesting 4-page
letter from Lt.-Col. James Wolfe, the hero of Quebec,
to Townshend, dated from Devizes, iSth July, 1756,
realised .£45 3s. /" 1 52 5s. was the highest bid made for
an exceedingly rare MS. account of the dinners provided
for the Lords of King Henry VIII. 's" Moste Honourable
Councell," from nth December, 1514, to 5th April, 1515,
signed by Cardinal Wolsey, then Archbishop of York ;
Thos. Howard, 2nd Duke of Norfolk ; Bishop Fox, of
Durham, afterwards Bishop of Winchester; Bishop
Ruthall, of Durham ; and Charles Somerset, Earl of
Worcester. The log included a number of letters from
Lord Lothian, Lord Aldenham, and Dr. James Gardiner,
concerning the document. Various documents, 22 in
all, exclusive of enclosures, concerning Sydney, New
South Wales, which was named after Viscount Sydney,
Secretary of State, who had control of the Colonies at
the time of its discovery, the dates mostly covering the
period 1788 to 1800, fetched ,£60.
Good prices were realised when the furniture from the
Sydney collection was dispersed. The following were
some of the most important items : —
Furniture a se{ of gix winiam and Mary walnut
high-back chairs, £78 15s. ; a William and Mary mar-
queterie walnut table, profusely decorated, ball feet and
tapering legs, 3 ft. 3 in. wide, .£68 5s. ; an antique black
and gold lacquered cabinet, with engraved brass mounts,
on table stand, /141 1 55. ; a Chinese incised lacquer
six-fold screen, in brilliant colours and gilt, gilt pierced
brass hinges. 6 ft. 4 in. high, 8 ft. wide, Kang-he, ^210:
a Louis XV. parqueterie king-wood writing table, with
226
/// the Sale Room
Edinburgh
Art Sale
chased ormolu mounts, 4 ft. 3 in. wide, £409 10s. ; an
early Georgian wall mirror, in carved and gilt frame of
scroll design, 5 ft. high, 2 ft. 10 in. wide, £jl 12s. : an
Adam carved and gilt oval frame wall mirror, 3 ft. 8 in.
D>" 3 ft-i i~64 IS- 5 ar>d a Louis XV. king-wood bureau,
2 ft. 7 in. wide, signed C. M. Malle, ,£52 10s. Previous to
the last-mentioned lot, a Louis XV. king-wood commode,
inlaid with hare-wood and tulip-wood, with rive panels
of finely executed marqueterie work on a green back-
ground, chased ormolu frieze, Siena marble top, etc.,
4 ft. 5 in. wide, brought £2,205. Other important sums
given were £252 for a Louis XVI. marqueterie writing
table, ormolu mounts, cabriole legs, 19 in. wide; £147
for a Louis XVI. parqueterie cabinet, of king-wood and
hare-wood, tambour front, tapered legs, gallery and
ormolu mounts, 2 ft. 1 in. wide; and £115 for a Louis
XV. king-wood commode, with marqueterie panel, chased
ormolu mounts, cabriole legs, 18 in. wide. Later, a
Louis XV. marqueterie tulip - wood and king - wood
cabinet, with richly chased ormolu mounts, 6 ft. 1 in.
high, 3 ft. 3 in. wide, fetched £252. The furniture was
sold on June 21st. 22nd, and 23rd, which were the tenth,
eleventh, and twelfth days of the sale.
A COLLECTION of modern paintings from various
sources was dispersed on June 12th by Mr. Dowell, at
his room- [8, 1 .eorge Street, Edin-
burgh:, when the following prices
were realised : — Arran from the Cam-
braes, by Arthur Perigal, F.S.A., 41 in. by 25 in.,
£30 9s. ; The Sognefjord, Norway, by A. Normann.
37 in. by 24J in., £32 11s. ; Nandschap, Holland, by
W. B. Tholen, 38J in. by 27 in., £32 [ 1 s. : Love's First
Steps, bj Anatole Yely. 12J in. by 22 in., £31 10s. ;
Fall on the Lednock, Perthshire, by Arthur I'erigal,
394 in. by 26 in., £32 us. ; The Pass of Shieldaig, Ross-
shire, by \V. Beattie- Brown, R.S.A., 50 in. by 36 in.,
£33 12s. ; and The Upper Rea Norfolk ids, by
Prof. Karl HefTher, 46 in. by 31 in., £58 16s. Later
on The Crofter's Team, by Joseph Farquharson, R.A..
72 in. by 43 in., which was exhibited at the I
Academy in 1876, fetched £5 1 9s.; Pascuccia, by John
Phillip, K.A.. 19J in. by 24 in., which was painted in
Rome, 1866, and exhibited at the R.S.A.. [867, and
International Exhibition, 1873, £31 10s. ; and Past ami
.' 1 at, by Sir George Harvey, P.R.S.A., 72 in. by
46 in., £84.
THE library of sporting literature formed by the late
Sir Walter Gilbey was sold at Messrs. Christie, Manson
and Woods on June 21st and 22ml.
" .Two scarce lots which should have
been offered were stolen mysteriously
in the week before the opening of the sale. They were
Pierce Egan's Boxiana, or Sketches of Ancient and
• n Pugilism, 5 vols.. 1818-29; and Samuel Aiken's
Delineations of British Field Sports. J. Hudson, 1823,
inscribed, "Unique and very scarce work. This is the
only known copy in existence. W.G." The sale com-
menced with some works by Henry Aiken. His National
Sports of Great Britain, jocol. plates, halfmor., McLean.
1825, realised £\o : Sporting Scrap Hooks, 50C0I. pi:
calf ex., g.e., by Riviere, orig. wrapper mounted at 1
McLean, n.d., £13: and rting Repository, 19
col. plates, half mor., McLean. 1822. ,{';i. Later, the
Annals of Sporting and Fancy Gasette, Jan.. 1822
June, 1828, with many illustrations by Aiken, Cruikshank,
etc., 13 vols., calf ex., g.e., by Riviere, 1822-8, a com-
plete set with rare June part in vol. 13, fetched £48 ; the
Annual Register, from commencement in 175S to
with index vol., I.-LXL, 149 vols, in 150, half calf 13
vols, cloth), 1758-1907, £S 10s. ; Life of a Sportsman,
by "Nimrod" (C. J. Apperley), 1st ed., 36 col. plates,
by H. Aiken, blue cloth, g.e., Ackermann, 1842. £50;
i, of Modern Faulconry, by James Campbell, [St
ed., frontispiece, green mor., blind tooling, g.e., by T.
Gosden, with his bookplate, Edin., 1773- £'h- The Old
English Squire : A Poem, by John Careless, isted.. 24
plates after style of Rowlandson, mottled calf ex., uncut,
t.e.g., by Riviere, McLean, 1821. £S : and Gentleman's
ation, by N. Cox, 1st ed., engraved title. Antient
Hunting Noats, and three folding plates, calf, 1
/19 10s. It was somewhat surprising to note that a set
of the Dictionary of National Biography, ed. by Sir L.
Stephen and Sir S. Lee. with the supplements and errata,
70 vols., cloth, 1885-1912, only realised £\\. The lot
immediately succeeding the first of the stolen books
noted above was Pierce Egan's Life in London, and the
Finish to Life in London, large paper, col. plates lis 1 ,.
and R. Cruikshank, 2 vols., green mor., y.e. with the
original broadside advt. of the former inserted , 1823-30,
winch was knocked down for £25. The Fancy, or True
Sportsman < Guide, . . . by an Operator, portraits
and plates, 2 vols., calf ex.. g.e., 1821., brought £\\ :
the Boke of Husbandry,-, now ' and
amended, by Sir A. Fit/herbert, black letter, vellum.
John Awdeley, 1568 (together with The Sur-
veyings, 156S, The Boke of Measuryng Lande, by Sir
K. ile Benese, Thomas Colwell, n.d.. and Xenophon's
Treatise of Householde, John Allde, 15 ction
i/cs (in 'formes des Armies Fi i 1814, 100
col. plates after Vernet and Lanin, also L. ■ lunie
of the Turks, 30 col. plates, in 1 vol., boards. Pan-. [822
— London, 1828, f.iy. Thomas Gosden's Essays on
Hunting, by a Country Squire, 1st 1
by T. Gosden, f. Roberts. 1735, £[& 10s. ; and the same
author's Impressions of a Series of Animals. Birds,
illusll British Sports from a set of Silver Rations.
engra Ott, portrait of Gosden, large paper, calt
ex., with some of the buttons reproduced on sid.
Gosden, 1821. £z\. < (ther prices on the first day were as
follows : Ackermann's Mi I ondon; or London in
Miniature, coloured aquatints by Rowlandson and Pugin,
3 vols., half mor., Ackermann, 1 <s. ; Aiken's
ting Satirist, title (mounted , and 12 col. plate
ex., 11. Dawe, 1834, £;- Barlow's 5<
Waves of Hunting, Hawking, ana ■ rding
to the English Manner, title and [2 pi;
Hollar, mottled calf. n.d. 1671), £19; Julian
The Gentleman's Academi '■■■of S. A/ban
227
7 lie Connoisseur
reduced into a better method by G. M(arkham), cuts of
arms, some coloured, calf, II. Lownes, 1595, .£23; and
Thos. Gosden, Portrait of the Sportsman, by Maile, after
Marshall, in 10 slates, including one in colours, also
autograph letters from the painter and from Clarkson
St.Liiheld to Thomas Gosden, bound in a vol., half call"
(with 7 specimens of Gosden's various bookplates; the
plates are signed by him, and an MS. note in his hand
states, "Time alone will prove the worth of this volume"),
,£210. A further selection of Aiken's works went as
follows:- A Collection of Sporting and Humorous
/ >, tigns, with over 300 fine col. plates, 3 vols., contemp.
mor., g.e., McLean, 1824, .£105: the original drawings
for The Sketch Hook, on sunk mounts, calf, g.e., ,£28;
( ockney's Shooting Season in Suffolk, 6 col. plates, half
calf, orig. wrappers preserved, McLean, 1822, ,£10 10s. ;
Hunting Sketches, series of 6 col. aquatints, cloth, Fores,
1859,^8 15s.; The Grand Leicestershire Steeple Chase,
1829, 8 col. aquatints, engraved by Hentley, with de-
scription of the race, cloth, Ackermann, 1830, ,£63 ; How
to qualify for a Meltonian, 6 large col. plates, mor. ex.,
front wrappers preserved, S. & J. Fuller, 1819, ,£36 15s. ;
National Sports of Great Britain, with description in
English and French, 50 col. plates, half mor., 1821,
,£58 16s. ; a different work. National Sports of Great
Britain, large paper, 50 plates, uncoloured, half calf.
[825, £y 7s. 6d. ; and Sporting Scrap Boo/:, 50 col. plates,
half mor., McLean, 1824, £6 6s. Towards the end of
the day Thomas Chippendale's The Gentleman and
Cabinet-Maker's Director, 200 copper-plates, 3rd edit.,
half calf, uncut, 1 762, brought ,£30. On the second
day Lord Lilford's Coloured Figures of the Birds of
the British Islands, 2nd edit., 7 vols., half levant
mor., uncut, t.e.g., 1891-7, fetched £32; The Young
Sportsman's Delight and Instructor, by < '.. M. (Gervase
Markham), frontispiece and cuts, orig. calf. "Sold
at the Ring in Little Britain," n.d., £S ; and J. C.
Smith's British Mezzotint Portraits: a Descriptive Cata-
logue, with Biographical Notes, etc., 125 portraits,
4 vols., cloth, 1884, /21. The next lot but one was
the rinest set in existence of the Sporting Magazine, or
Monthly Calendar of the Transactions of the Turf, etc.,
complete from the commencement in 1793 to 1870, with
index of engravings compiled by F. S. Hanks, and edited
by Sir Walter Gilbey 2 copies), with over 1,000 copper
and steel plates, after Stothard, Landseer, Scott, etc.,
together 158 vols., finely bound in full calf ex., g.e..
by Riviere, 1 793- 1S70- 1892, which was knocked down for
,£260. A note in Sir W. Gilbey's library catalogue states
that the set contains every engraving. Shortly after-
wards, R. S. Surtees's Analysis of the Hunting Field, 1st
ed., 7 col. plates by Aiken, and woodcuts, crimson mor.
ex., g.e., Ackermann, 1S46, was knocked down for,£8 5s.;
whilst the same author's Handler Cross, or Mr. for-
rock's Hunt, 1st ed., col. plates and woodcuts by Leach,
cloth, as issued, 1854, brought £lt>. Other prices were
,£24 for C. M. Westmacott's The English Spy, 1st ed.,
with col. plates by R. Cruikshank and Rowlandson, and
woodcuts, 2 vols., half red mor., 1825-6; /j 5 15s. for II.
L. Meyer's Illustrations of British lards, fine hand-col.
plates, 4 vols., mor., g.e., 1835-41 ; .£11 5s. for Remark-
able life of fail; Sheppard, Northampton, 1724, and The
Prison Breaker: A Faroe, 1725, both works inlaid to 4to
size and illustrated with numerous old engravings, etc.,
including mezzotint portrait of Sheppard by White, and
another, when in prison, in two states, published by Bowles
ion the bottom margin of one leaf is a pencil portrait
of G. Cruikshank by himself), calf, with book-plate of
W. Harrison Ainsworth ; £\~i for Thomas Sheraton's The
Cabinet-Maker and Upholsterer's Drawing Book, $rd ed.,
with appendix, calf, fine copy, 1802; ,£42 for Sportsman's
Cabinet, plates by Scott, woodcuts by Bewick, 2 vols, in 1,
russia ex., silken ends and fly-leaves, with wide inside
margins and joints, sporting tooling, etc., g.e., by Gosden,
with his book-labels, in calf-covered box with clasps,
1S03-4 ; £23 2s. for the original MS. of T. H. Taunton's
Portraits of Celebrated Racehorses, together with numer-
ous engravings and pencil drawings by the author, who
adds in a note that the pedigrees of all the horses have
been carefully investigated by reference to the Genera/
Stud Book, 4 vols., calf, with clasps, 1880 ; ,£22 10s. for
Venationis, Piscationis, el Aucupii Typi, 48 brilliant
impressions of engravings by Galle, after Bos, boards,
Antverpia* 1 1582 1 ; £33 for History of the Works of Sir
foshua Reynolds, by Algernon Graves and W. V. Cronin,
one of the six large paper copies, 115 photogravures, and
over 700 additional engraved plates added, with MS. in-
troduction by E. E. Leggatt — for whom the six copies were
printed (with list of the owners of these copies), 13 vols.,
half maroon mor., g., 1899; and ,£21 10s. for Capt. T.
Williamson's Orient, 1/ If eld Sports, 40 fine col. aquatints,
half russia, Orme, 1807. ,£65 was the highest bid for
Bagster's edition ( 1 808) of Walton and Cotton's Complete
Angler, largest paper, with the fine engravings by
Audinet. after Wale, portraits, etc., proof impressions :
also extra illustrated with a large number of rare portraits
and views, including original col. portraits, heavy oak
boards, covered with brown russia, with silken ties, silken
ends and fly-leaves, tooled joints and margins, wholly un-
cut, by Thomas Gosden, in mor. case. A catalogue note
states that " this copy was evidently illustrated and bound
by C.osden for William Simonds Higgs, whose initials are
on the side, and his portrait, painted in colours, forms
one of the frontispieces. The bands of this book are
made out of wood which belonged to Cotton's Fishing
House. Inscription, signed T. Oosden, on fly-leaf."
228
TH1-: EARL OF BRISTOL AND THE EARL OF BEDFORD
BY SIR ANTHONY VAN DYCK
hi the collection of Earl Spencer, K.G., at Al thorp
*.
■'.
Gallery of
Melbourne
The National ( rallery of Melbourne, founded more
than half a century ago, possesses one of the finest
collections of works of art in the
overseas dominions. The gallery
is contained, in an imposing classic
building, in which the public library
and museums are also situated. Amongst the statuary
standing in the grounds in front of the building are
bronze statues of Jeanne J' Arc, a replica by E.Fremiet
of the original which stands in the Place des Pyramides,
Paris, and of St. George and the Dragon, by the late
Sir Edgar Boehm, R.A. From time to time many
notable paintings have been secured. To mention
only a few: Quatre Bras, by Lady Butler; Love and
Deatk(& replica), by Watts : First Cloud, by Orchard-
son ; Queen Victoria, alter Gilbert's statue at Win-
chester, by Herkomer ; TheVintage Festival, by Alma-
Tadema ; besides many others.
In the year 1904 a wealthy citizen of Melbourne,
Mr. Alfred Felton, bequeathed the munificent sum
of ,£240,000, and the income derived from it, to be
devoted to the purchase of works of art for the
National Gallery. The trustees of Mr. Felton's will
are the Trustees, Executors, and Ag< m \ I !o., Limited,
of Melbourne, and they have power to appoint repre-
sentatives in England to advise them in the acquisition
of works of art. This Bequest Committee decide
what purchases shall be made, and when all trans-
actions are concluded the objects are handed over to
the trustees of the National Gallery. The latter have
hardly any power, except to reject or accept the
Felton Committee's proposals, although they may
make recommendations.
from the date when Mr. Felton's will came in
force most of the paintings and sculpture have been
purchased out of the bequest fund. At first matters
appear to have worked smoothly, and some fine
works were acquired on the recommendation ot the
111 on 1 " PERDl it"
1:',' |l 0 1 N HI IPPNER, R. \.
HASED UNDER NIK I I.I Ion i,i KIR j£2,OO0
pi 11; 1 1 \ Ml !S 1 HEOrHIl \ " 0FFY "l PA1 '
OSH I REYNOl DS, P.R.A.
■URCHASF.D ! IK I UK FE1 TON BEQ1 ESI Vol; /,'5,OO0
-; 1
The Connoisseur
director of the gallery, such as Fremiet's statue of
Jtanne d'Arc and The Bent Tree, by Corot, which
came from the Alexander Young collection ; but of
recent years there has been an uneasy feeling in the
Commonwealth that the funds accruing under the
Felton Bequest for the purchase of pictures to be
hung in the Melbourne Gallery are being, to a large
extent, misspent. In April last, Mr. Bernard Hall,
the director of the gallery, communicated a scathing
criticism to the Melbourne Argus upon some of the
recent purchases of the Felton Bequest Committee.
His chief attack is directed against two portraits, one
by Hoppner and the other by Reynolds. After
making some comparisons of the prices paid for
various paintings, he says: "With regard to the por-
trait by Hoppner, I fail to find a single masterly touch
or quality from top to bottom of this canvas. There
is neither drawing nor painting in the picture. It is
untypical, and, I should say, without hesitation, worth-
less as a work of art. The eyelashes are touched
in with a sable brush, lash by lash. The nostril is
similarly outlined. The comer of the mouth is shaded
with fine lines, as though it were a pen-drawing, while
neither the form of the lips nor the use of the brush
is understood in the least. ... I found so little
virtue and quality in this so-called portrait of Mrs.
Robinson on its arrival, that, remembering it had
been recommended as ' an excellent specimen ' and
' a fine example,' 'representative and well preserved,'
I was simply dumbfounded. Although we were told
' it had been in the Pleydell-Bouverie family for
generations,' I still had grave doubts, and determined
to put them to the test by writing for information to
the former owners. In reply to my request, Miss
Bouverie wrote: 'There must be either a mistake in
the history of Mrs. Robinson as given to you, or, if
it was a picture belonging to my brother, it has been
wrongly named.' To my second letter, with a photo-
graph of the portrait enclosed, Miss Bouverie replied :
' I quite recognise the picture as having been in the
possession of my family, but under the name of Mrs.
Abington, by Romney. It was bought by my father
about 1870-1. How the picture comes now to be
sold under another name is quite a mystery to me.
At the sale of my brother's- pictures in 1907 it fetched
.£165, so in the interval somebody has made a very
large profit. My father bought it in the ordinary way
from a picture-dealer.' So the statement that it was
in this family for generations boils down to the fact
that it was bought about 1870 from some now undis-
coverable dealer, and in thirty-seven years passed
from father to son, and was sold for ,£165 to a dealer,
who (having first changed both the name of the artist
and the actress) disposed of it two months afterwards
for ,£1,000 to a private collector. This gentleman
(from whom we purchased the Reynolds.) kept it for
three years, until finding we were in the market,
graciously consented to let us have it (at a profit to
himself of 100 per cent. ) for ^2,000. . . . We are,
however, still as far from knowing whose portrait it
is or by whom it was painted, and The Times critic
(himself one of the best authorities on Hoppner)
was strictly correct when he wrote in that journal
(February 28th, 191 1), beyond that it had come from
the W. Pleydell-Bouverie collection, 'nothing seems
to be known of its history.' Finally, although we had
been informed that our portrait was catalogued and
described in Roberts and McKay's authoritative work
on Hoppner, it was soon discovered that ours, although
known to the authors, was not mentioned at all.
. . . The history of the portrait by Reynolds, which
at least is an authentic work, is as follows : — It was
sold at Christie's in 1874 by a descendant of the
Reynolds family to the then Mrs. George W. Currie
f°r ^J73- In 1906, at the sale of Lord Currie's
pictures, it was bought by a dealer for 950 guineas.
On the very next day it was sold by him to Sir William
Bennett for -£2, 100 — an advance of ,£1,100 — who in
less than five years sells it to us for ,£5,000, in this case
an advance of nearly .£3,000. This in my opinion is
no masterpiece, nor one to obtain which there was the
slightest reason to have ' plunged ' to such an extent.''
The Argus devotes a leading article to the subject,
and stales : " However strictly the letter of the bequest
may be respected in the mere process of purchasing,
its spirit is being grossly outraged if our National
Gallery is being made, as seems to be the case, a sort
of dumping-ground for mediocre works of art foisted
upon it at exorbitant prices by astute dealers and
collectors. It would almost appear as though sellers
in the Old World had come to regard the Melbourne
Gallery as a place of all others with which a highly-
profitable trade might be done in pictures having
little to recommend them beyond the names of great
artists who had painted them in their weaker moments,
or to whom they were attributed on more or less
doubtful authority. . . . The two purchases such
as these, capping all the other vagaries of the present
system of buying, call for the severest condemnation.
It is little short of a public scandal that this generous
bequest should be so abused."
Late Celtic Art as exemplified in some Bronze
Mirrors of the Period
In the accompanying illustration of late Celtic
bronze mirrors will be seen some almost unique and
highly characteristic examples of the art of the period.
The archaeologist who has once become familiar with
«3 2
Notes
NO. I.- THE BIUDI.IT MIKKOI
late Celtic art products and
designs, will have little trouble
in recognising other products
ofthesame school; but though
possessing certain character-
istics which are easily recog-
nisable, they are difficult to
explain or define. The pecu-
liar decoration consists ot
wavy or scroll designs, which
have been called trumpet-
shaped, from their resem-
blance to some early bronze
trumpets found in Ireland.
" It often takes the form of a
recurring spiral; atother times
a series of two or more spiral
linesstart from a certain point,
going off to a similar spiral."
The late Mr.Romilly Allen
suggested that the scroll-like
designs are the outcome of
conventional ised foliage.
Cross-hatching, shading by
lines and dots, and other de-
vices, were used to heighten
III. - I HE DESBOROUGH MIRROR
N". II. - I 111, W VRDEN MIRROR
the artistic effect, as was also
enamelling.
The mirror. No. i.. was
turned up by aquarryman at
P.irdlip, in Gloucestershire,
m 1879, and is photographed,
by permission, from a plate
in Vol.V. of the Transactions
of the Bristol and Gloucester-
shire Ardiaological Society.
KeiMiKiMA. Smith, Ksi].,r>..V.
F.S.A., in his account ol the
find, in. Irclucoiti^in, describes
it thus: "The chief piei 1 Ol
grave furniture was a large
bronze mirror of exceptional
beauty, with an engraved
back and moulded handle in
the best late Celtic style. It
is somewhat oval in form, the
greater diameter, 1 o| inches,
and the other, 9! inches. 1
weight is vs! ounces, The
Lack i s practically covi
with eccentric scroll - work,
with a filling of basket-work
The Connoisseur
pattern, and there is a "C" scroll affixed to both
laces just above the junction of the handle, each
enclosing three pairs of red enamel dots, f inch in
diameter. The handle is handsomely moulded, and
its curves enriched by ribbed lines, while the oval
terminal encloses a moulding in which are set two
red enamel spots on either face, exactly like those at
the opposite side of the handle. In all these sixteen
settings the enamel is well preserved and of uniform
colour, while in one case the surface has been chipped
and a sound body revealed below."
The next mirror, No. ii., was found about six miles
south-east of Bedford in i860. It was broken in two
parts, which have since been united. It is shaped
somewhat like a kidney. Its diameter is i\ inches,
and its looped handle 3] inches long. It is nothing
like so perfect in condition as is the Birdlip specimen.
There are traces of red enamel in the disc within the
terminal loop of the handle, and in the two similar
discsat the end of the handle on the back of the mirror.
It was not until the year 190S, during excavations
for ironstone at Desborough, in Northamptonshire,
that the most perfect specimen yet known of the late
Celtic mirrors was unearthed, No. iii. From its
excellent state of preservation we may conclude that
it had not been lost or thrown away, but had been
carefully wrapped up and preserved in a woman's
grave. It is now in the Northampton Museum, and
the writer is indebted to the Museum authorities for
permission to photograph it. Mr. Reginald Smith
describes it thus : — " The front and handle are still
covered with a beautiful green patina, but the engraved
back was inadvisedly cleaned with acid in removing
some spots of lime deposit, and the new surface has
the colour and lustre of old gold, though it is gradu-
ally becoming bluish-green again. The mirror is
practically identical with that found at Birdlip, but is
in better condition, and though without enamel, is of
somewhat finer execution. It is of kidney form,
with a major axis of 10^ inches, and height of about
•9 \ inches; the finely moulded handle projecting over
the disc and measuring altogether 6 inches. Short
arms, in one piece with the handle, are grooved to
hold the disc, and the edging, which tapers away from
the handle, is fastened to it by means of rivets. The
handle is moulded on the same lines as the Birdlip
example, and the trumpet-pattern extension which
grips the plate is in high relief, and is repeated within
the oval loop at the end of the handle. The back
is engraved with eccentric scroll-work of the usual
character, but of unusual delicacy, and reference to
the illustration will obviate the necessity of describing
the indescribable. The crescentic loop is much in
evidence, and at either extremity of the major axis
should be noticed the double ring enclosing three
segments. The surface is pitted in places, the bark
as much as the front, but the latter has still a beauti-
ful polish."
The old French colour-print, Girl taking Coffee, is
the second of the pair by Louis Bonnet, or " L.
Marin," as he sometimes chose to call
Our Plates , . ,,- , • , r j
himself, to which reterence was made
in July. Even more pleasing is the pair which com-
prises The Shepherdess and The Wood Nymph, by
J. R. Smith, after S. Woodford, one of those who
worked for Boydell's " Shakespeare Gallery." He was
elected an Associate of the Royal Academy in 1S00,
and a full member in 1807. Van l)yck:s Portrait oj
the Earl of Bristol and the Duke of Bedford is a most
characteristic specimen of the great artist's dignified
grouping, the original being in the collection of Earl
Spencer, at Althorp. George Digby, 2nd Earl of
Bristol, one of those who opposed the attainder of
Strafford, was present at the battle of Edgehill, but
resigned his command owing to having fallen out with
Prince Rupert. In 1645 he became Lieut. -General
of the Royalist forces north of the Trent, but retired
to France after his defeat at Carlisle Sands. After
the Restoration he returned to England, where he
died in 1677. William Russell, 1st Duke of Bedford,
held Parliamentarian views, and was engaged in the
siege of Sherborne Castle. The year after Edgehill
he became a Royalist, but soon returned to his original
faction. He survived the great Civil War until the
year 1700, having been born in 1613. Also by Van
Dyck is the Portrait of Lady Wharton, which belongs
to the Duke of I levonshire, as does also the beautiful
unfinished Portrait of Georgiana, Countess Spencer,
and her daughter, by Sir Joshua Reynolds, a most
interesting study. The lady was wife of the 1st Earl
Spencer, and the little girl, also Georgiana, who was
born in 1757, afterwards married the 5th Duke ol
Devonshire, as was recorded in our last issue, when
the famous Chatsworth portrait of the Duchess, then
herself a mother, came under notice. We have
reserved the drawing of The Maid of Bath, in the
collection of Mr. John Lane, to the last for special
mention. It is an interesting specimen of the earlier
work of Ozias Humphrey, R.A., and is in all prob-
ability a portrait of Elizabeth Ann Linley, afterwards
Mrs. Sheridan. She was the daughter of Thomas
Linley, senior, the well-known Bath musician, whose
children were described by a contemporary writer as
"a nest of nightingales." Miss Linley was known as
"The Maid of Bath," and was painted many times by
Humphrey, who used to lodge with her father what
time he made sojourn in the city of Bladud.
234
A Suggestion
By the Editor
The end of the war may not yet be in sight,
but before its finish every family, every hamlet and
town throughout the Empire, will have lost many of
its sons. No doubt, to commemorate these, memorials
of every kind will be erected, such as costly build-
ings, triumphal arches, fountains, statues, obelisk.-,
and crosses : while churches will be enriched by gifts
of window-, screens, altars, and lectern-. Tablets
and brasses to individuals will lie further multiplied.
But similar thing- are gifted in peace, and may be
passed by un-
i g n i s e d.
So stupen-
dous. - o
epoch -mak-
ing an event
seems to de-
man d so m e
very special
mi m or i a 1.
( > ii r pre sent
prolonged
life-and-death
struggle is for
i eedom t o
live our li>
liberty and
progress.
Against usare
the powei ol
hell and of
hate, deter-
mined lomur-
d er, crush,
rob. ami en-
slave. The
powers o t
I larkness an
once nini i .
let us hopi
CHAND1
for the last time, arrayed in deadly earnest against the
powers of Light, and light must prevail.
There is thus one object that will occur to all as
more appropriate than any other to commemorate
this direful war. Tin sentiment embodied in the
LAMP is pure and poetic. As the giver of light in the
hours of darkness, it has become invested with a
mystic and symbolic aura, standing for life, hope,
truth, learning, wisdom, and piety, and where it sh
the powers of evil and darkness cannot prevail. To
the Egyptian
Flame was a
benel i c e n t
deity re
sented by the
lamp. The
symbol i sm
has never
been lost sight
ol. cither in
church, mos-
que, or syna-
gogue, and it
existed in the
Creek and
Roman Tem-
ple. Flame is
seen in its
terrible
- t s in the
light n i ng's
flash ami VI il
C a n i c o u I
burst, a n d
there
a w e s I
ma '
us iii pri-
mitive limes.
It 1) e C a m e
AN EIGH i 1 1 RV 1 1.!
The Connoisseur
?
GILDED WROUGHT-IRON CHANDELIER A I LOSEL'S
feared, and a thing of mystic import. Later it was
in ognised as a purifier, and hence the funeral pyre ;
and Gehenna as a place, not to punish, but to ren-
der the gross and material body fit for the life to
i mill'. Flame-worship was ever to propitiate and
placate the great purifier, and lastly became the em-
blem of the Holy Guardian Spirit and Everlasting
Life.
Tbe light-holder may be of colossal si/e, like the
old Pharos and our lighthouses, and in antiquity they
must have been beautiful and stately objects. The
gold lamp of Callimachus on the Acropolis burnt
night and day without refilling for a year, and above
it was a bronze palm-tree which rose to the roof of
the Erectheum. Dionysius placed a bronze lamp
stand in Tarentum which held 365 lamps, one for
each day of the year. Pliny speaks of pendant lamps
in the form of trees loaded with fruit, such as the
famous example taken by Alexander at the sacking of
Thebes, which subsequently found its way to the
temple of Apollo on the Palatine, dedicated to
Augustus. A very beautiful Etruscan example, set
round with sixteen nozzles, was found at Cortona.
The bronze tripods, called Delphinian, and mentioned
by Pliny, and some of the great marble tripods and
candelabra found in Rome, are stately objects. The
It. than churches still abound with superbly modelled
tripods of bronze for lamps and candles modelled on
these.
Noteworthy examples of hanging lamps and lan-
terns, some of high antiquity, exist at Venice, Pisa,
etc., and there still remain two of the great suspended
236
IVar Memorials: A
Suggestion
coronas, symbolisingthe heavenly Jerusalem, at Hildes-
heim and Aix-la-Chapelle. These votive coronas
were in early days of immense size and elaboration.
One at Bayeux, presented by Odo, brother
of the Conqueror, was in the form of bands,
sixteen feet in diameter, carrying tower-
like lanterns with statues of saints. The
material was copper, gilt and enamelled,
and overlaid in part with silver, inscribed
with forty-eight Latin verses. It held a
large number of wax candles, and was de-
stroyed by the Huguenots in 1562. The
seven-branched candelabra were also ol
monumental proportions. One at Rheims
was eighteen feet high, and measured fif-
teen feet across the branches. It was of
the rich and elaborate interlacing work,
in which much symbolism is involved, of
the latter part of the eleventh century,
enriched with crystals which reflected the
lights from the larger candles held in basins
at the extremities of the branches. It was
destroyed in the French revolution, but
a very interesting fragment remained at
Rheims Cathedral, perhaps now too de-
stroyed by more ferocious Kultur. The
description of an even more sumptuous
example, also eighteen feet high, at Cluny,
glistening with gold, crystal, and beryl, has
been preserved. It was inscribed with
leonine verses, and is supposed to have
been presented by Matilda, wile of the
Conqueror. The base of .1 line specimen
is preserved in Milan Cathedral, but with
an upper part made in
Italy at a later date. A
plain but complete exam-
ple remains at Essen, but
ui relatively later date and
small dimensions. Ali
1 ordi dan 1 clipsed
in si/e by the colossal and
richly worked bronze
seven- branched candela-
brum of 1 Uirham, which
a.i almost as wiili- and
high as tli- choir of tin;
cathedral in which it
i. It comprised, like
;n' 1 - ! . 1 1 'j . 1 1 ' "i'l
saints, etc., 1 'I deep sym-
bolic import. Several
votive coronas dedi-
cated in the 1 Inlv Virgin
mm
mm
ft 1 "a
WROUGHT-IRON LAMP \l CHELSEA IIOSPI1 M
and patron saints, and others of late mediaeval date,
are safely preserved in Germany; but others of far
greater interest and liner workmanship which exis
in Belgium, chef - d'eeuvres in iron by
famous smiths, may have shared in the
ruthless destruction of its noble monu-
ments. All these, ranging over a long
interval of time, not only served to give
light, but to keep in remembrance the
hope of eternal life and of salvation. In
England ill-timed puritanical zeal has
swept the churches bare, but even the
heavy brass chandeliers of the seventeenth
and eighteenth centuries which took the
place Dt those destroyed were put upas
memorials and inscribed, am ntly
hang from finely decorative iron chains.
The- ancient tradition that light-hold
should be artistic, and even magnificent
objects, prevailed, in fact, till the early pi
of the nineteenth century, as seen m silver,
ormolu, and gilded wood chandeliers and
sconces, the crystal lustres, and bronzes of
the Stuart and Hanoverian mi man hs. The
introduction of gas for lighting and an ex-
pansive "free trade" killed the old senti
ment, which is only beginning to re
owing to the greater adaptability of 1
tricity. Hence our cathedrals and churches
are lighted, especially ifgasisthe medium.
)V skimpy meretricious fittings made in
Birmingham.
It must fall to others to design monu-
mental lamps worthy the occasion. All
that we can do here is tO
notice some lew examples
of lamps that exist. Very
dignified and monui
tal lamps were fixed to the
1 if palaces in some
lew towns ni N01
Italy, notably 11 !
where tin 1. are 0 well-
designed bronze t<
Imlilers. Lantern
candle-holdcrsare happily
tomb-rails, and church.
screens. The great hang-
ing cross in the dome ol
St. Mark's, Venice, with
iis multitude ol lamps.
a n il the SUS p e n ded
237
The Connoisseur
li\ angels, weighing over a ton, and ever memorable
as suggesting the movements of the pendulum to
Galileo, are important and suggestive examples. A
sketch of this, correcting the effect of perspective in
published photographs, is here given.
An even liner French example, from a drawing in
the Victoria and Albert Museum, is also repro-
>lii' ed. Of more immediate interest, perhaps, is
the great iron lamp-post and lantern designed by
Wren for Chelsea Hospital. Two of these stood at a
suitable distance to the right and left of the extreme
limits of the facade, and resemble somewhat in
outline the contemporary lighthouse. They were of
monumental size, some twenty feet in height, and
perfectly unique, I icing in wrought iron. Another
interesting, little known, and unique specimen of
English wrought ironwork is the gilt chandelier at
Losely, with its delicately fashioned flowers and
wheat-ears. Both of these are illustrated for the
first time.
■ /.[■: LAMP IN ]'I- \ CATlII.I'l M
THE MAID OF BATH.
FROM A DRAWING BY OZ1AS HUMPHREY.
In the Collection of Joint Lane.
" Chats on Japan-
ese Prints," by
Arthur Davidson
Ficke. (T.Fisher
Unwin. 5s. net)
That Mr. Ficke's Chats on Japanese Prints does not
cover all portions of his subject with the same adequacy
may be ascribed rather to an excess
than a deficiency of knowledge on
the part of the writer. He is a col-
lector, and, one suspects, is affected
with a collector's predilections in
favour of styles and periods of art
w hich coincide most happily with his personal sympathies.
In Mr. Ficke's case these appear to lean towards those
artist-- who flourished in the last half of the eighteenth
century, about two-thirds of his criticism being de\
to the consideration of the men who flourished between
1764 and 1806. One might also demur to his classifica-
tion of the different periods. He cannot be considered
responsible for christening the artists who worked be-
tween 1660 and 1 7114 as "the Primitives,'' yet, as he
himself tacitly confesses, this "commonly accepted
name " is highly misleading. It creates the impre
that it refers to "designers in whose works are to be
found the naive efforts of unsophisticating and group-
ing minds. Nothing could be further from the truth
ands of years of artistic experience and tradition
lay back of these production- : ami the level of aesthetic
sophistication implied in them was high/' Even in the
technique of wood engraving these men were not begin
ners, for wood 1 n ,».i in ; appears to have been prai
m fapa 1 the thirteenth century. The hundred and
odd years included in the so-called primitive period was
a time in which many of the greatest Jap igners
hed. "To an extent greater than the arti
an; ticceeding period the) 1 1 1 1 ■ ol
detail and accuracy ol repn sentation, sacrificing these
thing- lor tip- sake of achieving bro.nl decorative effects
combined with vig 1- movement." With th
Mr. Ficke is in full sympathy. He 1 an - cellenl
account of Moronobu, who practically tra I wood
engraving from a craft mto an art ; i Ikumura Mansanobu,
who is credited with having invented printing in pol) -
chrome, ami [shikawa Toyonobu, whose name-, hardly
mentioned in early works on the subject, owing to fresh
discoveries of his work has lately been elevated
position of honour. The other masters and mini
of the period are also adequately treated. Mr. Fi
second period is that of the early polychrome masters,
and only extends from 1704 to [780, the last named date
marking the retirement of Katsukawa Shunso, who. with
his great rival Susuki Harunobu, first exemplified in his
work the artistic possibilities of colour printing. The
next period, 1780 to 1790. synchronises with the <
years of the career of Torii Kiyonaga, from whose n
ment the author dates the period of dei adence. This is
bringing the palmy period of Japanese ait to within un-
duly narrow limits, more especially as Mr. Ficke allov
the period of decadence only sixteen years, and includes
all the work that has been produced since [806 under the
heading of "The Downfall." It must be remembered
that during this last period, 1 >usly titled.
some of the best-known designers of Japan flourished,
and that landscape art. in the prints of Hiroshige and
Hokusai, attained its highest level. To the lattei
the author scarcely doc-, adequate justii e, but the genius
of Hiroshige, "whose work" remain-- perhaps the
complete and magnificent landscape record that .my land
has evei had, is fully appreciated. If one has paid undue
on 0 VIi ! ■ system ol
partly because the - 1 ellem e ol the rest of the
work appeared to warrant a higl ci ticism
than i- usually applied to book- ol a popular chat
It 1^ no men- compilation from earlier authorities,
an original contribution to the literature of the sub
written by one who has made il a special studj
the author is perhaps inclined to over-estimate tin
tivc importam e of the earlier pi
matte more than ol
la ' reliable cicerone to the work ol the
masters as well as the earlier. The book ful
its title to I"' "1 prai tii a lide for the ' and
be recommended as a valuabli every-
one interested in Jap 1 1 nts,
-P
The Connoisseur
ciatc Prints," by
Frank Weiten-
kampf. Second
and Revised
Edition. (Grant
Richards Ltd.
7s. 6d. net)
Tin- reader has, at first, some difficulty in discovering
the revisions which mark the second edition of Mr. Frank
Weitenkampf's Hois to Appreciate
Prints. One would hazard the guess
tliat they have been restricted to the
narrowest dimensions possible in
order to avoid any material resetting
of the old type. A few foot-notes
have been added at the feet of
various pages, and in one or two
places criticisms of various modern
engravers have been curtailed in order to allow mention
of men whose rise to fame is still more recent. Thus,
on page 42, seven lines have been bodily subtracted
from the description of Mr. Joseph PennelPs etchings,
and the space thus gained is divided between Frank
Hrangwyn, D. V. Cameron, Muirhead Bone, and James
McBey, whose work was not mentioned in the earlier
edition. Such a method of revision can make no
approach to completeness, and it may be questioned
whether Mr. YVeitenkampf would not have done better
to leave his work in its original state, for now, while one
or two portions of it are brought more or less up-to-date
to 1 91 5, the greater part of it has advanced no further
than 1908, the year of its original issue. In its general
survey of the theory of artistic print collecting, few works
are written with more knowledge, or are more interesting
or clearly expressed. On American engravers it is espe-
cially well informed, a natural characteristic of a work
written by an American primarily for American readers.
Every method of engraving and the best work executed
in it are described, including lithography — on which there
is an excellent chapter — wood engraving, and even photo-
gravure. Almost invariably Mr. Weitenkampf may
be taken as a thoroughly reliable guide, but there are
a tew occasions on which he makes slips— generally of
minor importance. The most important is on page 86,
where he speaks of "the introduction of steel plates,
about 1820, and steel facing." The latter process — that
of giving copper-plates the same durability as steel by
covering them with a thin deposit of the latter metal —
did not come into use until a full half century after the
date named, and its introduction entirely revolutionised
the prevailing methods of engraving. Early in the
nineteenth century the necessity of issuing large editions
of engravings to make them commercial successes
gradually drove copper-plates out of general use, for
copper, being a soft metal, would only print a relatively
small number of good impressions. As it is almost
impossible to engrave in pure mezzotint on steel, this
caused the temporary extinction of the method and the
introduction of the mixed style, so much practised by
Cousins during his later years, "in which etching,
roulette, stipple and burin work" were all introduced.
When, some time about the eighties, steel facing was
introduced, pure mezzotint could once more be practised,
the coating of steel being applied to the copper after the
actual engraving has been completed. Thus the revival
of mezzotint and of reproductive etching dates from the
early eighties, the introduction of artistic photogravure
dates from about the same time, and the three methods
between them have practically superseded the mixed
style of engraving. Mr. Weitenkampf is thus hardly
correct in suggesting that mezzotint has "suffered from
the rapid and enormous development of that photo-
mechanical process known as photogravure/ for the
modern revival of the former method synchronised with
the introduction of the process, and for all the best
reproductive work is gradually replacing it. The author,
however, does not appear to have followed recent
developments in mezzotint, either printed in monochrome
or colours, and adds not a word to what he wrote in the
first edition of his book. In writing on Cousins he gives
titles which do not appear on the original editions of his
plates. Thus he speaks of Boyhood's Reverie {Master
Lambton) ; the name given in brackets is correct, the
other only appearing on the plate when it was first re-
printed. In the same way he writes of the Bud of Promise,
which is the name given to a late and artistically worthless
reprint of Miss Peel. Mr. Weitenkampf, however,
largely disarms criticism on the historical aspect of his
work by pointing out that it "aims to be a guide to
appreciation, not a history.'' It admirably fulfils its
intended purpose, and there are few books better fitted
to instruct the amateur as to the technicalities of the
different methods of engraving, their various excellencies
and defects, and the merits of their principal exponents.
An index to periodicals appears to be such an absolute
necessity to those who wish to keep in touch with current
opinion, that one can only wonder
"Index to Periodi- why the admirable publication
cals. A Classified arranged by Mr. A. Cecil Piper and
and Annotated edited by Mr. Alex. J. Philip has
Index to the not long ago been anticipated. A
Original Articles sjmilar publication has been issued
contained in the , ., ., ■ ,
, tor several years on the other side
1 ' n n 1 p 1 1 Vv ccklv
„. , , , of the Atlantic. Though primarily
Monthly, and , , , . " v , .
,-. ( n • j- arranged for American readers, its
Quarterly reriodi- °
, ,, /C. , utility to the few English students
cals. (Stanley
who were aware of its existence has
been undeniable, and the present
venture, which embodies several
improvements in arrangement and contains a list of sub-
jects more in accordance with our insular requirements,
should meet with substantial support. It was originally
intended to include leading continental journals within
the scope of the index, but the war prevented this idea
from being carried out. and so the first issue of the publi-
cation is concerned only with English and American
magazines for the half-year ending September, 191 4.
This does not, at first sight, appear a very formidable
undertaking, but when it is stated that the magazines
indexed number over a hundred, and the articles recorded
to between three and four thousand, it will be seen that
the compilation is one that has entailed considerable
labour, while the thorough manner in which it has been
carried out does great credit to those concerned. The
titles of the articles have been systematically arranged
under generic headings, they are also separately indexed,
Paul and Co
£1 is. net)
242
The Connoisseur Bookshelf
and an index of authors is given, so that the whereabouts
of all articles bearing on any subiect, or by any author,
or of any individual article, can instantly be traced. The
only improvement which may be suggested for future
issues is that for the list of magazines indexed the
address or town of publication of each should be given.
SO many works on furniture have been written that it
is necessary for the critic to regard a newcomer with
somewhat jealous scrutiny. To
ntique urn«- justify its entrance into a section of
ture, by Fred. W. ',- , ■ , . , , , ,
„ ,r. literature which is already crowded.
Burgess, (ueorge , , , . . . . ,
r> i f o o 't should either contain entirely
Koutledge & Sons, c
T , .. ,. tresh knowledge or enibodv know-
Ltd. 7s. 6d. net) °
ledge already existing in a more
concise, comprehensible, or interesting form. Mr. Fred
W. Burgess would probably not claim the first of these
attractions for his Antique Furniture, for nothing that he
tells us in it has not been said before. The question
therefore remains : does his painstaking compilation of
already well-known facts enable the reader to better
understand them and appreciate their connection with
one another? A glance over the volume reveals that the
illustrations, of which there are one hundred and twenty-
six, do not help to elucidate a large number of the styles
and periods covered by the text. Mr. Burgess carries
the scope of his survey from the furniture of ancient
Egypt to that of the early Victorian period. The earliest
types illustrated are Tudor: asingle Louis XVI. secretaire
does duty for the whole range of French furniture, while
the examples selected include far too many pieces neither
typical nor particularly noteworthy in other respects.
Turning to Mr. Burgess's letterpress, one finds that he
writes in an interesting manner, but hardly bears out the
promise contained in the preface, '"to confine myself to
what is calculated to be of real service to my readers."
The stories of the financial speculations of the brothers
Adam with the Adelphi, the Coronation chair in West-
minster Abbey, the lengthy accounts of the careers of
Chippendale and Sheraton, and the copious extracts
from books on furniture design by various makers, may
all be interesting to a reader not already ai quainted with
them, but they are not likely to assist him materially in
the knowledge or appreciation of furniture styles. In
the more practical pans of his book Mr. Burgess is
generally rather vague and sometimes actuall) '
leading. On page [48 he states : "Connoisseurs do not
always take into account sufficiently the influence archi-
tects exerted over the furniture trade during the first hall
of the eighteenth century. At that time they were very
active, such men as Adam and Kent being destined to
exert a far-reaching influence." As Adam, al tin clo 1
of "the first half of the eighteenth century.' had not
completed his education ai Edinburgh University, In,
architectural activity during that period must have been
what ofa precocious nature. Kent is recommended
as drawing from the pen of Horace Walpole many eulo-
giums, of which one isquoted. I lad Mr. Burgess continued
the quotation to the end, he would have found WaJp
remarks were conceived in a spirit of irony, lie .
to Chippendale as an original designer a much more im-
portant role in the development of English furniture than
recent authorities are apt to assign to him. and fa
mention the great majority of famous foreign designers.
even when, as in the 'aniel Marot, they exercised
a profound influence on contemporary English work. It
is, of course, impossible to put in everything in a volume
of this size, but Mr. Burgess can hardly be acquitted for
his omissions on the plea of want of space, as he includes
so much that is really unessential. His work has the
appearance of being written by one who has got up his
subject rather than thoroughly mastered it. A descriptive
list of woods used by the cabinet-maker and a glossary of
technical terms are moderately well compiled, but the
former contains the statement that "although not intro-
duced into this country until 1 595, mahogany soon became
the favourite wood of the cabinet-maker," whereas it was
hardly used at all until well over a century after its
introduction; and the latter informs us that "a ioint-
stool was a high stool usually used by carvers in 1
up a joint at table," whereas its true derivation is from
"joined-stool," or stool with joints.
Discoveries of lost masterpieces of painting .u'
infrequent, and occasionally an original, not known to
have been lost, turns up and
" Monograph on , .. , ■ , ,
T 7 places a copy or replica which has
Leonardo da , . . . ,
,r. ., ... been masquerading in us place
Vinci s Mona '
j. , ,, , Mr. John K. Eyres monograph on
t„u_ ip c Leonardo's Mona Lisa is intended
John K. tyre
(H. Grevel & Co. '" Prove tllaI sometning like this has
5s net> happened in regard to this famous
portrait. The recorded hist'
the version at the Louvre is far from clear during the
interval between leaving the painter's studio at IT
and its appearance in the collection of Francis 1. The
mam facts, briefly capitulated, are as follows: V'asari
states that the picture of Mona Lisa was painted for her
husband. Frances del Giocondo, and that Leonardo
worked four years on it without completing it. The
generally accepted ii 1 that the artist delivered
the work to 1 do in its unfinished state in 150401'
1505, in the latter of which years he left Flo
Rome. The picture was then lost sight of for o\ er twenty
' . when it, or another version, was bought by the
King of France, either from Leonardo 01 his executors,
and is now at the Louvre. This has hitherto
generallj accepted as the only version of Mona
painted by Leonardo. Lately another rendering of the
• ha been disi 11 Isle worth, in «
or two well known clitics havi i ed the personal
' 'i the master. It is, al any rate, not an 1
copy of the Lo
important variations. The expression of the fa
11 ■ mournful; the background, which is wholly
different in composition, is unfinished ; and the figure ol
uned between a I upright p
This work, then, answers to Vasari's description of the
Mono Lisa being left unfinished, and it also corres]
fai more closely with Raphael's sketch ol the 51
«43
The C onnoisscur
now in the Louvre, the pillars being a noteworthy
feature of the latter. Mr. Eyre has chiefly devoted his
monograph to showing that it is not only possible but
extremely likely that Leonardo painted two versions of
the subject, one of which, still unfinished, was delivered
to i lioi ondo, and the other taken by the artist to France
and completed there towards the i lose of his career.
The author has shown indefatigable industry in accu-
mulating evidence on this point, and makes out a strong
i ase for his contention. It would have read more con-
vincingly if he had allowed his facts to speak more for
themselves ; he is apt to try to prove too much and weary
the reader with a superfluity of argument. Whether the
Louvre Mona Lisa is Leonardo's first or second version
"l the subject does not affect its greatness as a work of
art, and a depreciation of its merits in no way helps to
establish the authenticity of the Isleworth picture. The
latter must stand or fall on its own merits, and most
readers of Mr. Eyre's monograph will suspend their
judgment concerning it until it has been submitted foi
examination to leading experts on Leonardo's work.
One of the most difficult of tasks is to trace the identity
of personages represented in an " old master " of whom
no definite record has been kept.
If such a work be famous, apocry-
phal legends gather about it which,
after the lapse of centuries, it is
impossible to substantiate and
almost impossible to disprove. The
investigator may follow a hundred
"The Goldsmith
and the Young
Couple, or the
Legend of St. Eloy
and St. Godeberta,
by Petrus Chris-
tus,"byH. Clifford
S nith FSA promising clues which appear to lead
(Bernard t0 discovery, and find that every-
Quaritch 6s net) one ends in a blind alley ; hence in
research of this kind an immense
amount of labour will often produce little tangible result.
A case in point is afforded by Mr. H. Clifford Smith's
investigation of the well-known picture by Petrus Christus,
known as The Legend of St. Eloy and St. Godeberta, in
the collection of the late Baron Albert von Oppenheim.
The work, which is on panel, 4 ft. 3 in. by 3 ft. 10 in., is
signed by the artist, and dated 1449. It represents a
goldsmith selling a ringto a young couple. The costumes,
jewels, and all the contents of the shop are painted with
wonderful minuteness, while on the counter in front of
the goldsmith is represented a convex mirror, in which
are reflected two men walking in the street outside.
The head of the goldsmith is encircled by a halo, which,
if painted by the artist, would do much to establish the
present title of the work, but there is a strong probability
that it was added posthumously. Mr. Clifford Smith, in his
endeavour to throw light on the theme of the picture, has
patiently described all the multitudinous details recorded
therein. He is thus able to tell us the character and
significance of every jewel, utensil, or garment depicted,
and incidentally to make the reader acquainted with
much interesting mediaeval goldsmith's lore. On the
identity ot the figures he has been able to throw a little
light. The chief discovery he contributes is that the
pendant worn by the young man is the badge oi the
contemporary dukes of Guelders, and thus shows that
he was connected with them, though from his age he
could not have been either the reigning duke or his son.
One of the figures represented in the looking-glass weai
the collar of the Order of the Golden Fleece, and thus,
as he cannot be identified with the then patron of the
Order, Duke Philip the Good, he must be one of the
twenty-nine contemporary members. His companion
carries a falcon, and Mr. Clifford Smith suggests that he-
may be Henry Van Eyck, the then falconer to Duke
Philip. Unless some fresh documentary evidence turns
up, as in the case of Holbein's Ambassadors, it appears
unlikely that much further light can be thrown on the
picture. Mr. Clifford Smith in his painstaking brochure
has at least thoroughly cleared the ground for any future
investigators, and by clearly defining the limits in which
the identities of the personages depicted must be sought,
has reduced the chances of a false attribution to a
minimum.
In his brochure, subtitled . / Description and Histot
Sketch of the Memoir of the Seigniory of de Beaujeu, Mr.
W. D. Lighthall, who is presidenl
"The Manor of the Antiquarian and Numismatic
House of Lacolle," Society of Montreal, gives an in-
by W. D. Light- teresting account of the vicissitudes
' ' ' ' . which have attended this rein ol
(Privately printed , , _ , „ , ,r,
. /-. > ■«* , old French Canada. I he manor-
by C. A. March- , , ., . .
. „„ ,. house in question was built in 1025
and, Mont^al) ' T, ,
by Mrs. Henry Hoyle, and is situ-
ated about four miles south-west of Lacolle village and
about forty miles from Montreal. Mrs. Hoyle, who
by a former marriage had become the wife of Major
Schuyler, had inherited her large fortune from her
grand - uncle, Lieutenant - General Garret Fisher, or
Visscher, a loyalist officer who was present at the taking
of Montreal. After the death of Major Schuyler, the
history of the family becomes merged in a sorry tale of
disputes between the children of Mrs. Hoyle by both
marriages, the lady herself, and her second husband.
The last co-Seigneuresse of Lacolle, Mrs. Mary Averill
Hoyle, died early in 1914. The remainder of the
pamphlet is occupied by an account of the artistic con-
tents of the manoir, which included a fine pewter flagon,
bearing the date-stamp of Henry VIII., and some
Dutch chairs of the late Spanish period.
^44
gURREflTART
Naval and
Military Works
at the Guildhall
The most striking feature in the exhibition of nava]
and military works .it the Guildhall is the fine display
of French art. It is not merely the
largest section of the exhibition, but
is the only one which includes any-
thing like an adequate representation
of the work of the country to which it belongs. It epito-
mises French military work for over a century ; the English
pictures, probably because of consideration of space, are
almost wholly confined to examples produced during the
last twenty or thirty years: while the representation of
Belgian and Russian work, owing to the hostile occupa-
tion of one country and the difficulties of transit from the
other, is almost negligible. I'nder these circumstances
French military art appears at a decided advantage, and
the unrerlective visitor might be forgiven if he assumed
that the English work was merely an offshoot from it.
This is not the case, for modern military as well as
naval pictures owe their origin to England rather thai:
to France. Naval art has never established itself in
France — a natural sequence to the fai t that the m
glory of the country has been almost entirely gained in
battles on land. In England our school of naval paint
ing dates back to the time of the Van der Veldes, both
Willem the elder and YVillem the younger settling in
England. From them is derived the long line of English
painters of sea and shipping, which, beginning with such
men as Monamy, Scott, and Brooking, rose to its height
in the time of Turner and Stanfield, and is now n
sented byWyllie. Henry, Somerscales, Cribble, Wilkinson,
and other well-known artists. In military painting the
succession was neither established so early nor has it
been so clearly maintained, the true ancestor of the
modern battle picture being West's Death of General
This was painted in 1771, the same via: that
Gro was born, and Gros must be looked upon as the
THE CHASl 01 III! GERMAN CRUISERS ON JANI VRY J.l. M1I5, IIY nil-: HON. MM [OI.I.EM/1
-45
NAPOLEON AT ARCOLE
BY ANTOINE JEAN BARON GROS
246
Current Art Notes
originator of the modern battle picture in France. The
picture which represents him here, a replica of the figure
of Napoleon taken from the large canvas of Bonaparte
at Arcole, is dramatic in conception, and shows the firm
draughtsmanship one might expect from the greatest
but it is far more convincing, and strikes an unhackneyed
note in the rendering of the pageantry of war.
What may be termed the middle period of French
modern military painting was dominated over by Mi
sonier, who brought to his large canvas the minute
l'RANSLUCENT CHALCEDONY BOTTLES
THE PROPERTY OF MK. O. C. KAI'H.U
1,1 RLINGTON KINK ARTS CLUB
pupil of David. Gericault and Delacroix, who com-
pleted Gros's unconscious work of replacing the classical
tradition of David, are not represented here. Horace
Yernet, whose facile brush was employed by Louis
Philippe to furnish some roods towards the acres of
battle pictures which fill the Palace of Yersailles, is seen
in one of his earlier examples, The Figlit at the Clichy
Gate, painted in 1820, which is both more realistic and
sincere than his large and ambitious Government com-
missions ; while Raffet and Charlet, perhaps now more
celebrated for their lithographs than their pictures, have
half a dozen costume pictures between them. Hippolyte
Bellange is at his best in A Review in 1810 under the
Empire in the Place 1/11 Carrousel. It has not the
dramatic power of the same artist's Retreat from Russia,
precision of a miniature painter. The Guide, by whii b
he is represented, is a good example of his powers, well
drawn, carefully painted, and highly finished. It is a
miracle of painstaking work, perfect in its way, but
appealing only to the intellect, and failing to touch the
emotions. A contrast to the placidity of this picture is
afforded by Gerome's Execution of Marshal Ney, in
which the dramatic possibilities of the situation have
been fully seized. Ney's body is represented lying on
the ground at the foot of a blank wall ; the firing
party are marching stolidly away, one of their number
— an officer — turning his head half round to catch a
last glimpse of the bravest of Napoleon's generals.
Though Meissonier's style was followed by Detaille and
lie Neuville, the two most popular military painti
iRANSLUCENT CHALCEDONY BOTTL] ill) PROPERTY 01 MR. 0. i RAPHAEL, A BURLINGTON PINE AR1
247
The Connoisseur
the last generation, the tragedy of the Franco-Prussian
Wat of ICS70 turned men's minds more to the realities of
war than its pageantry. Detaille, indeed, kept closely to
the path of his master, painting in a more free style and
with a greater feeling for colour. The largest of his
works here is The lletlieny Review, which is interesting
as recording a notable way-mark in the Franco-Russian
alliance. A more typical example is the Napoleon and
his Generals, with its effective grouping and wealth of
picturesque costume ; while more spontaneous in execu-
tion are some of his admirable single figure studies. De
Neuville was more realistic in his battle scenes. His Le
Bourgei — a replica of the larger picture now in America
— depicts a party of French wounded being brought out
of the shattered village church after a heroic resistance
against overwhelming odds. The note of tragedy is
strongly marked without being over-accentuated. Bou-
tigny's Brave Man, showing a villager, single-handed,
keeping a body of Prussians at bay as they turn in at the
far end of the street, is a work of similar character.
Pictures of this kind give a clue to the dogged heroism
displayed by the French in the present war. The old
ideal of purely martial glory has evaporated and the
nobler ideal of self-sacrifice for the service of the country
lias been evolved. One may see this ideal put on to
canvas in many forms — in The Parisians at femappes,
by R. Uesvarreux, where a group of motley uniformed
citizens are shown, transformed into an invincible army
by their enthusiasm for liberty ; in the Here they are ! by
J. M. Dujardin-Beaunietz, which depicts the inhabitants
"t a chalet extemporising a defence against the advanc-
ing Prussians; and most simply of all in the Square
Battalion at Waterloo, by A. P. Protais, which shows
the moonlit field strewn with the piled-up dead.
This ideal is not so apparent in modern English art,
for English land battles have been fought less for the
defence of the soil of the country than of the outlying
wards of her far-flung empire, and her army has hitherto
been a class apart from the rest of the people. And so
in the English works one sees pictured a race of pro-
fessional fighters whose exploits are marked by an air
of insouciance, who face death with a nonchalance which
attracts the admiration but weakens the sympathy of
the spectator. Possibly one does not feel this so much
in the older pictures as the more modern ones. Maclise'a
two finished cartoons for the large water-glass panels
are, indeed, almost wholly aesthetic in their sentiment,
Maclise being more concerned to make a well-balanced
composition and invest his figures with statuesque
grace than to tell a dramatic story, or even put it into
good paint. Desanges, in the Victoria Cross Gallery,
painted for the Crystal Palace, went in heavily for
theatrical sentiment. The half-dozen canvases from it
which have found their way here are as lifeless as an
old-fashioned melodrama. Lady Butler, though her art
is on a far higher level than Desanges's, sometimes erred
in the same direction. In this respect her After Balaclava
and Steady the Drums and Fifes are among the worst of
her pictures. The former is a page of Kinglake trans-
lated into paint ; but it is not a typical page of British
Army history. Some of the men who took part in the
terrible charge were dazed and bewildered when they
came back. Put these were the exceptions ; the great
majority were ready to do it again. Lady Butler has
painted the exceptions. In the scene at Albuera the
artist shows the nervousness of a group of juvenile bands-
men. However they felt, one can argue confidently that
they presented a bolder front, for half their number fell
on the field before the French left them in possession.
One of the most convincing canvases is Mr. Beadle's
Rear Guard, which shows the old 95th Rifles forming up
across a snowy landscape to hold back the French. In
this the haggard, war-worn faces of the men and their
dilapidated uniforms give a note of realism to the scene
which is not always found to the same extent in the
artist's other works. Mr. R. Caton Woodville's Saving
the Guns at Maiwand is, perhaps, the most spirited
picture in the exhibition. It realises the movement and
action of frantically galloping horses with a vigour that
carries conviction to the spectator. Another picture of
the same character is Mr. John Charlton's British
Artillery entering the Enemy's lines at Tel el Kefir;
but in this the act-ion, though equally true, is less vigor-
ous. Of Mr. R. Gibb's four pictures, The Storming of
the Dargai Heights, with its subtle tone of blue carried
throughout the picture, is the most artistic, yet will
probably never secure the same popularity as The Thin
Red Line or Saving the Colours, in which the human
interest is more strongly emphasised. Napoleonic episodes
are strongly in evidence. Mr. Woodville paints the
emperor and his troops in emulation of Meissonier, and
with the same regard for the accuracy of the uniforms of
the period. In Mr. Ernest Croft's Evening at Waterloo
a graphic representation of the emperor's fall is given!
he is pictured galloping with his staff On the Sands at
Boulogne, by Mr. A. C. Gow, in a work showing move-
ment and refinement ; and by Mr. P'red Roe receiving
Urgent Despatches during the retreat from Moscow. In
this picture the artist has realised the dramatic possibilities
of the scene as well as the pictorial, and the result is
a convincing work. In far too many of the pictures the
artists fail to remember that a hard-fought battle cannot
fail to leave its traces on the clothes and persons of the
combatants. This was more especially the case in the
sea battles of the old days before cartridges were invented,
when the grime of the powder and the thick smoke must
have made the men engaged look like so many colliers.
Yet in nearly every work showing the deck of a vessel
after a naval action the decks appear in spotless condition,
and the uniforms of the officers and men in review order.
( )n this account the representations of naval sea-fights
as seen from some distance away are by far the more
realistic. Mr. Wyllie's Battle of the Nile and Battle of
Trafalgar, besides being well-arranged compositions,
gave one the idea that they were faithful representations
of the events depicted. The latter remark equally applies
to Lord Home's I 'ictory, by Mr. Thomas Somerscales ;
while Mr. Cribble's On the Road to Trafalgar gives a
beautiful idea of the grace and majesty of a fleet of the
old line-of-battle ships under full sail. The modem
248
LADY WHARTON
BY SIR ANTHONY VAN DYCK
In the collection oj II : Grace tfa Dul oj Devonshire, at (
Current Art Notes
^B iAHh ^B- " v' ^B
B- ■ m 1
15V t
INLAID BLACK I ICQUER PANELS
warship is not so picturesque, but both Mr. Norman
Wilkinson and Mr. C. Napier Hemy use its artistic
possibilities to good account ; yet Mr. Duff Tollemache,
in his Chase of the German Cruisers on January 24th,
rgij, gives us what is perhaps the most vivid idea of
a modern naval battle. The handling of the work is
somewhat heavy, but Mr. Tolle-
mache has succeeded in convey-
ing .in impression of the vastness
of the scale on which a modern
naval action is fought. The
giant warships, each belching
out a dense cloud of smoke, look
small when compared to the
surrounding expanse of sea. on
the extreme verge of which may
be dimly distinguished the flying
foe. Though almost invisible, his
shells are burstingthickly around
the English vessels, and this
remoteness and practical invisi-
bility of the enemy is the salient
characteristic of the opening
e, of a model n fleet battle.
I here are numerous pictures of
land battles in the present war,
yet none of them can be regai 1
as typical of the struggle, mile,.
one excepts tin 1, iiilile little
sketch of M. (i. Jeannii 1
ing a body of German troops
deliberately shooting down a
crowd of unarmed Belgian citi-
zens— men and women alike —
penned up in the cornel 1 ii
factory yard. A large number
of topical porti dl are shown in
1111. PROPERTY OK MR. K. II. BENSON, \l NIK BURLINGTON FINE \KI
the exhibition, but most of these, with the exception oi
Mr. Harold Speed:s clever sketch of the King of the
Belgians, have been on view lately. Perhaps the two
finest — in colour at all events — are the one of Lord
Ckarhs Beres/ord,by Mr. Furze, whose untimely death
n ibbed the English school of one of its greatest masters ;
and that of the Emperoi
Russia, bv M. Serov.
The Exhibition of
the Royal Society
of Miniature
Painters
I\l AID BLACK LACQUE1 I Mi I 1 REEN
•I UK PRi 1 1 I 1 . OI .11 1 It. BI NSON
\ fON FIN! Mi CI
I'm effects of the war were
shown at the twentieth exhibition
1 il the Royal
Society of
M iniature
Paint e r s.
held at the
Mi idem 1 ial lei \ . 61, New Bi
Street, by there being a greater
number of absentees than u
Half the membei ;w<
- ted, and others ent fewer
1 ontributions. The president,
Mr. Alyn Williams, had only a
single example, a half-length
figure of a man. entitled The
iple. 'Ibis was mil of char-
acter, and, though highly finished,
painted with 1 1 u e nc j and de
Sir |anie 1 ' I into n wa S
similarly re)
biiiion 1). abinet
water-coloui entitled A'- 1
and Silver. \\
good in eoloti 1. tul ami
1 d manipul 1
to hold its o u 11. 11.
The Connoisseur
texture, with any of the orthodox miniatures. Some of
the latter, indeed, were treated with the freedom of
water-colour sketches. An undue tendency this way is
to be deprecated, as a miniature, whatever its style,
should be a complete and finished composition. That
this necessity can be complied witli in vigorous brush-
work was shown in the vigorous self portrait of .Mr.
Edwin E. Morgan, in which the modelling and charac-
terisation of the face and the incidence of the reflected
lights on the flesh were marvels of close observation.
The portrait of a lady in mourning, entitled One of
Many, by .Miss Bess Norriss, was equally good, being
set down with crispness and decision, and everything the
artist wanted to say fully conveyed. Neither the Tulip
Girl nor the Nude Study was quite so complete. A
different style of work was shown in the three minia-
tures by Miss N. M. Hepburn Edmunds, in which the
handling, though equally definite in intention, was far
more minute. In these good colour was combined with
firm draughtsmanship, but there was a slight tendency
to hardness. Among other portrait miniatures which
deserve mention were Miss Aimee Muspratt's nicely
touched in Black and White ; Mr. V. W. Burnand's
daintily coloured Helen; Miss Winifred Swayne's two
attractive studies of children ; the Portrait of a Lady,
highly reminiscent of the eighteenth-century masters, by
Count Mario Grixoni ; the well-modelled Portrait of a
lady by Miss lima Soutten : and works by Miss Lilian
Hacker, Myra E. Luxmore, Mabel Edwards, Georgina
Laing, Chris Adams, and Mr. Hope Douglas. Of por-
traits in other mediums, the coloured wax medallion of
Dorothy, daughter of Robert Newman, Esq., by Miss
Florence Newman, may be commended for its> sharp,
crisp modelling and effective colour. Some good portrait
medals were shown by Mr. Cecil Thomas and some well-
coloured enamels by Miss Mary Pitts. Subjects which
do not come within the classification of portraits included
a clever character study of a shoemaker reading, entitled
A Lover of Dickens, by Mr. Charles Spencelayh ; a well-
posed and dainty drawing of A Dancer in pink, by Miss
Florence White ; and some good dog studies by Miss
Minnie Fox.
ONE might give a guess of the ownership of the im-
portant loan collection of pictures by British and Dutch
masters exhibited at Messrs. Agnew's
English and . ,, , ,.,. , _ , „ ,,T ,
p. 7 , tut . (.allenes (43, Did Bond Street, W.),
Dutch Masters . "-" . .
in aid ot the British Red Cross Society,
as many of the item; have been shown in recent loan
exhibitions, where they were catalogued as belonging to
Mis. F. C. K. Fleischmann. Probably few collections
of the same size attain such a high general level of
excellence, for though every master exemplified was
1 mi seen at his best, there was little that did not
attain a representative standard. Of the English por-
trait painters, the men who attained their full reputation
in the early nineteenth century were generally seen to
better advantage than their eighteenth - century prede-
cessors. Hoppner's Mrs. Williams, better known under
its engraved title of The Mob Cap, is one of the most
fascinating presentments of young British womanhood he
ever produced ; and Lawrence's Mrs. Planta, though not
so sympathetic in its vision, almost rivalled it in its
attractiveness. Raeburn generally succeeded best with
older women, and his Alicia, Lady Stcuart of Kinross,
in its atmospheric qualities, and the superb management
of the flesh-tones and the whites of the drapery, is as good
as anything he painted. The five Cainsboroughs were
more mixed in quality ; the Miss Butler and the fine
bust portrait of Dr. William Pearce were both character-
istic, the former of his earlier and more restrained manner,
and the latter of his Bath period ; the Landscape, a late
work, beautiful in colour and fluent in handling, but
showing indications that it was one of the artist's
imaginary compositions rather than directly suggested by
nature, was also highly characteristic ; but neither the
heavily painted and clumsily handled David Gari ick 1101
the highly - finished Admiral Hawkins showed much
affinity to the artist's usual work. The former picture, as
the one engraved by Collyer, and the latter, as men-
tioned in Fulcher's life of the artist, have both well-
established pedigrees, otherwise one might be disposed
to doubt the correctness of their attribution. The
Miss Mary Pelham of Sir Joshua Reynolds was clever
without being particularly attractive, while his Mrs.
Huddesford was neither good in colour nor execution,
and was further marred by the intrusion of the head of a
preposterous dog. Romney, when he painted the portrait
of Mrs. Clay and Child, had the Venetian masters in
mind, and the rich, almost bizarre, colouring was obviously
inspired by them. It is a direct piece of work, well
sustained in tone, but not altogether happy in composi-
tion. Among the English landscapes, Willie Lot's
Cottage, by Constable — practically the same subject
which Lucas engraved in the English landscape series
under the title of The Mill Stream — showed the most
originality, and though small, was a thoroughly charac-
teristic example of the artist in his greatest period. An
important landscape, Woodland Scene with Figures, by
James Stark, was also thoroughly characteristic, but
showed, by its close affinity in outlook and treatment to
the magnificent Landscape with Figures, by J. Ruysdael,
which hung near by, how greatly the artist was inspired
by the Dutch masters in his interpretation of nature.
The collection included several other characteristic
specimens of Ruysdael, two good Hobbemas, and a fine
portrait of a Boy Beading, by Hals. In its brushwork
this was perhaps the finest picture in the exhibition, but
it failed to come up to the standard of colour and atmo-
sphere exemplified in the two fine Rembrandts — the
Portrait of the Artist's Father and the Portrait of a
Woman, known as Rembrandt's Cook.
THE twenty-fifth exhibition of the Royal Society of
Portrait Painters (the Grafton Galleries) rivalled Madame
Tussaud's in the number of like-
The Royal c . , , , •
e— . nesses of topical celebrities, more
Society oi Portrait . ,, ' , , ...
_ . especially of naval and military
Painters
officers, it contained. I he majority
of them had been shown previously, some of them making
252
Current Art Xotcs
their third or fourth recent appearance. There were
other works in the exhibition which were not on view for
the first time, so that altogether it was far more retro-
spective than usual. In the first gallery the predominant
colour was khaki, a hue which, however perfectly it
satisfies military requirements, affords little assistance to
the artist in search of the picturesque. One cannot say
that any painter succeeded in making the current English
service uniform interesting in the same way that the
English eighteenth-century masters made the military
uniform of their time interesting ; but the failure casts no
reflection upon their skill, but only serves to exemplify
how more and more the portraitist is becoming handi-
capped in the matter of costume. Mr. H. Harris Brown,
fortunate in being able to paint Captain the Hon. Ian
Maitland, A.D.C., in the parade uniform of the Cameron
Highlanders, set down the scarlets and greens with a
gusto that showed he enjoyed the opportunity. He had
managed the flesh-tones of his sitter's countenance with
great discretion, neither investing them with unnatural
pallor, to contrast with the scarlet, nor making them
unduly rubicund, to hold it in place, but recording
them in their natural hues without upsetting the tonal
balance of his picture. The nondescript drabness of
khaki reigned almost supreme in the other military
portraits. Mr. J. J. Shannon, R.A., was perhaps the
most successful in its treatment. In his portrait of
WalterS. Keigwan, Esq., he had. at any rate, attained
a homogeneous colour-scheme, and good brushwork and
a lively appreciation of the sitter's personality made the
work both convincing and interesting. His portrait of
H.R.H. The Princess Mary, which is to be sold for the
benefit of the Queen's Work for Women Fund, was
among the few really attractive portraits of royalty. ( ine
might suggest that this picture might well be engraved
for the benefit of the same charity. It would make a
highly pleasing subject apart from the personality of the
sitter, and, aided by the princess's great popularity,
should command a large sale. Neither Mr. Hugh de T.
Glazebrook nor Mr. Herbert A. Oliver was altogether
happy in their portraits of the King. The one by the
last-named artist — a sketch for his Royal Aca
picture — was perhaps the better of the two ; it was not
flattering, but it conveyed more individuality and < harm
ter. Going back to the first gallery, one found relief
from the prevailing khaki in Mr. Frederic Whiting's Eva,
with its trenchant note of re, 1 and orange, a delightfully
brilliant and spontaneous work. Mr. Maurice Gn
hagen, in his portrait of Mn Oswald Bri rley, had
attempted what Reynolds declared
ful attainment to paint a picture in which blue should
be the predominant colour. Unlike Gai
Blue Boy, Mr. Greiffenhagen's work supported the theory
of the first president of the Academy, the great mi
blue in tin tume striking an unpleasantly
cold and harsh note. In Ml I B. Kenning
portrait of Miss Kennington cold colour also occupied
the greater portion of the surface ol the picture, the
background being in slate grey and the -liter's costume
m a lighter tone of the same colour. In this, howi
the darker tone formed not so much part of the picture
as the ground on which it was painted, the artist using
it a- a water-colour painter would a sheet of tinted card-
board. It thus served to give value to the warm yet
delicate flesh-tones and the more tender greys of the
dress and hat. The work is a thorough success, the
effect gained being not that of a tour de force, but as
though the artist had nicely suited his method, so as
o \ ve the most pleasant and characteristic record o)
the sitter's physiognomy. Mr. J. J. Sargent's Millicettt,
Duchess of Sutherland, while well holding its own, lost
by comparison with the artist's more recent wink.
both less homogeneous in its conception and spontaneous
and individual in its execution. The Girl in Hlack of
Mr. George Spencer Watson attained a note of dis-
tinction, but was wanting in vitality. One felt that a
sixteenth-century Venetian painter might have seen the
subject in the same way, but that, as a specimen of
twentieth-century art, it was something of an anachro-
nism. Passing by Mr. Richard Jack's easily posed
Lieut. R. J. Jack, Mr. Wm. B. E. Ranken's clever
but over slickly painted Lady Maud Hoare, and Mr.
Frank O. Salisbury's solid and dignified Capta. .
Hon. H. C. O'Callaghan Prittie, one came upon Mr.
John Lavery's striking portrait of Mr. Churchill. He
was represented in three-quarter face, turned towards
the spectator, the far side being almost lost in shadow.
This gave the artist the opportunity of showing thi
modelling of the forehead and the lines of the face. It
was a powerful portrait, doing full justice to the sitter's
intellectual and strongly characterised physiognomy.
A contrast to this was Mr. Ellis Roberts's smoothly
painted portrait of Miss Olwen Lloyd George, in Welsh
national costume. It was impossible to deny tin
draughtsmanship of the work, or that the artist had
set an attractive portrait on canvas, but the whole
picture smacked of artificiality. Though the figure was
: I out of doors, the lighting was that of the sti
and the background of foliage and distant mountains
carried as little conviction as the painted canvas oi a
photographer's operating-room.
THE fifty-third exhibition of the New English Art
Club at the galleries of the Royal Society of British
Artists Suffolk Street did not en-
hance the prestige of tha
l>i main of the stronger mem-
bers were either unrepresented or represented only by
sketches, while the most numi o
hibitors verged on post-impressionism without acti
rig the border-line; their wmk attained the failure
of mo il was hard mgh to
be in: i or eccenti i to be entertaining.
Among the few paintings which attained distinction was
Mr. I Call Robinso mural decoration of
Orphans, a work intended for thl ' the
Middlesex Hospital. Though the first exhibited i
by the artist in tins style of w ch an extended
scale, the largeni
and simplicity oi his techi lit him f<
The New English
Art Club
2S3
The Connoisseur
and in this instance, out of the commonplace theme of
the inmates of an orphan asylum sitting clown to an
evening meal, he had made a noble and dignified
picture, suffused with tender sentiment. Its one failing
was that it appeared disconnected, a blemish that was
less owing to faulty composition than to the conflicting
lighting. In the body of the picture the illumination
emanated almost wholly from a lamp, while the bright-
ness of the full moon seen through a window high up
in the wall, forming the background, showed that the
twilight must be far advanced, yet on the right of the
picture a bevy of girls trooping down a narrow flight of
stairs appeared to be emerging out of or into broad day-
light. This incongruity gave the picture the appearance
of being divided into two independent compositions.
Another work of the same genus, but widely differing
in its outlook, was the Decoration for Summer, by Miss
Ethel Walker. In this the artist had confined her
efforts to clothing a rhythmic arrangement of line with
pictorial suggestion that showed no approach to realism.
The composition suffered from a monotonous prepon-
derance of curves, and wanted some straight lines to
give it strength and afford a contrast. Among the land-
scapes, Mr. Mark Fisher's three contributions expressed
in true and poignant colour the feeling of springtime ;
Mr. P. Wilson Steer confined himself to sketches
marked by a tantalising suggestiveness of beauties
which required concrete definition to give them ex-
pression : Mr. C. 1. Holmes's small Brick Cupolas,
a transcript of a vividly red building with tall chimneys
silhouetted against a smoke-laden atmosphere, conveyed
with almost monumental force a sense of the dreariness
and desolation of a typical black-country scene ; and
Mr. A. W. Rich contributed several scholarly studies of
old buildings, (if figure subjects, Mr. A. A. McEvoy's
portrait of Virginia, daughter of Captain Harry Gra-
ham, attracted attention by its sentient brushwork ;
Mr. F. H. S. Shepherd's La Grandmere achieved a
succes d'esttme in the application of an archaic treat-
ment to a modern subject ; and good work was con-
tributed by Messrs. W. W. Russell, Philip C. Smith,
and Mr. Bernard Meminsky.
It has frequently been noted that collecting is the
most lasting of habits. Even the present disturbance of
normal life will scarcely be found
strong enough to make the born
collector altogether forsake his
hobby. Moreover, .is all collectors know, the habit of
collecting once acquired, good things appear to come of
themselves within the collector's radius. This being
granted, there is no necessity to urge the advantage it is
to all interested in old furniture, antiques, and curios
generally to take care to have adequate information at
hand on things doubtful or not thoroughly understood
in this wide and important field. We commend to those
interested in antique furniture the Waverley Book Com-
pany's announcement in this issue regarding their pub-
lication, Englisli Furniture of tlic Eighteenth Century.
Every interested reader of this journal will find it ad-
vantageous to seize this opportunity to learn all about
A Guide to
Furniture Values
tins standard work, which is written by Mr. Herbert
1 i ;i insky, and which gives at length and in authori-
tative form the necessary information as to periods,
makers, and values. A postcard to the Waverley Book
Company, Ltd., 7, S, and 9, Old Bailey, London, E.C.,
will bring to any reader the free booklet on this work.
Wl have received a copy of their latest catalogue from
Messrs. E. Parsons & Sons (45, Brompton Road, S.W. ,
which contains references to a
A New Catalogue , , . , ,, ,
particularly varied collection of
interesting books, whilst the section devoted to fine
old engravings is strongly represented. A collection of
brilliant original impressions of Aiken's coloured prints
will appeal to the connoisseur of sporting art, whilst the
numerous portraits and views of topographical value,
including works by Turner and other eminent artists, are
all of standard merit.
I 111 study of antique furniture is one of the most
absorbing that can be taken up by a connoisseur. The
extreme subtletv which has to be
Antique Furniture , . , , ,• a ,■ .
n exercised in order to differentiate
between the styles and their overlapping periods exer-
cises a strange fascination, and tends to widen the
outlook on the artistic world to no small degree. All
collectors cannot be experts, it is needless to remark, but
every connoisseur finds some fashion in furniture to his
taste, which he delights to gratify by possessing " lares.
the authenticity of which is unquestioned. The stock
of Messrs. Davis & Sons, Ltd. (209, Tottenham Court
Road, W.i, contains numerous pieces which are likely
to appeal to the collector, whilst for those who prefer
modern work there are reproductions of old specimens
specially designed to harmonise with any old-world
surroundings.
A FEATURE of the last few months has been the
number of sales which have taken place in old country
mansions, whose owners have passed
away, or. for various reasons, have
seen fit to part with some of their
belongings. A good proportion of these dispersals have
been undertaken by Messrs. Knight, Frank cc Rutley
(20, Hanover Square , and some of the results have
alreadv been reported in these columns. Particularly
prominent on the list are the names of the sale of
"The Sydney Collection'' at Frognal, the contents of
1 1< \ eningham 1 kill. Suffolk, the property of the late Lord
Huntingfield, and those of Worth Park, Sussex.
Ni>i only to those connoisseurs who have returned
from the front wounded, but also to all in need of a
movable seat, the new "Wheel-
about Chair," placed on the market
by Messrs. John Barker & Co., Ltd.
(High Street, Kensington), will appeal as one of the
necessities of life. The design is neat, and the chair
has been specially constructed to meet the present de-
mand for inexpensive furniture of this type, whilst the
rubber tyres render traction both easy ami silent.
The Houses of
the Great
A Chair for the
Wounded
-54
The Connoisseur
VALUATION AND
CORRESPONDENCE DEPARTMENT
Special Notice
Enquiries should be made upon the coupon which will be found in the advertisement pages. While,
owing to our increased correspondence and the fact that The Connoisseur is printed a month before
publication, it is impossible for us to guarantee in even' case a prompt reply in these columns, an
immediate reply will be sent by post to all readers who desire it, upon payment of a nominal fee. Expert
opinions and valuations can be supplied when objects are sent to our offices for inspection, and, where
necessary, arrangements can be made for an expert to examine single objects and collections in the country
and give advice, the fee in all cases to be arranged beforehand. Objects sent to us may be insured whilst
they are in our possession, at a moderate cost. All communications and goods should be addressed to the
" Manager of Enquiry Dept., The Connoisseur, 35-39, Maddox Street, W."
'Books.
" Annals of Sporting," by Caleb Quizem, 1809. —
A9.4S8 (Leeds). — We do not think that your copy of the above
work would realise more than two or three guineas, unless an
exceptionally fine example. You are not quite correct in
stating that one realised ,£13 at the Gilbey sale on June2Ist,
for, as a matter of fact, there were twelve books included in the
lot which fetched the sum mentioned.
Clocks and Watches.
Watch Cock. — Acj,446 (Barcelona). — Many of these can
be procured comparatively cheaply, and, without seeing yours,
we should not appraise its value at more than, say, 7
do not know the name of the maker.
Orandfather Clock, by "John Broom, Castle
Coomb." — Ag,45o (Calne). — We regret that we have been
unable to trace the name of this maker in any of the usual
channels of information. If you care to send us a photograph
of the clock, we may be able to assist with regard to the
period, etc.
John I '.in I. .11. Clockmaker. — Ac,, 452 (Leicester). — John
Burton was apprenticed to Richard Warren, of the Clock-
makers' Company, in 1672.
Engravings.
"Clytie," by Bartolozzi.— Aq,4I7 (Leicester).- Voui
print in colours is one of a series, and, if a good impre in,
should be worth about / 5, 30 tar as we can judge without
the original.
ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS
Painters and Paintings.
Miniature. — A9,479 (Berwick-on-Tweed). — We regret that
it is impossible for us to value the miniature of the Duchess of
Devonshire without an inspection. We cannot attempt
remarks as to the artist, as we are not able to tell the peri
the painting from your description.
Figino. — Ag,4So (Bodmin). — There were two Italian
painters named Figino, Ambrogio and Girolamo, both of « horn
flourished at Milan about the last decade of the sixteenth cen-
tury. They produced historical subjects.
Danks. — A9.4S2 (Putney). — Francis Danks was a Dutch
historical and portrait painter. He was born in 1650, and
in 1703.
Unidentified Paintings. — Shortly after its inception,
the management of Til K CONNOISSEUR decided that it would be
necessary to provide some section in its pa es lo deal with the
numerous enquiries about unidentified paintings which came to
hand. And it was for the purpose of reproducing these pictures,
at the purely nominal charge of 10s. 6d. each, that NOTES AND
QUERIES was instituted. As anticipated, readers of the maga-
zine were able to supply the required information from their
own experience of the past history or identity of the works
illustrated. With a view of ascertaining to some extent the
utility of this department, a lengthy list is in process of com-
pilation showing the principal successes scored in the v.
identifications, which it is hoped to publish in Till". CONNOIS-
SEUR as soon as completed.
6d. We
"Health and Labour," by (iaugain. — A9,449
(Stamford). — Your print of the above denomination is worth
11 1 1 v < to -even guineas. We cannot help you with regard
to the other engraving which you mention, as the ;. is nol
staled, and there have been reproductions.
"Pottery and Porcelain.
Oriental Vase. A0.401 (Kilburn). — The mark on your
Oriental vase shows that it t-< hinese, Kia-1
We must see the vase itself before appraising a value.
China Mark.— A9.495 (Purley). — The copy of mark which
you send to us showing an " S '' over two crossed sw< ids and
a star bel '". in blue. 1- Caughley in imitation of Dresden.
2SS
HE CONNOISSEVR.
GENEALOGICAL AND
LDIC DEPARTMENT
Special Notice
Readers of The Connoisseur who desire to take advantage of the opportunities offered herein should
address all letters on the subject to the Manager of the Heraldic Department, Hanover Buildings, 35-39,
Maddox Street, W.
Only replies that may be considered to be of general interest will be published in these columns. Those
of a directly personal character, or in cases where the applicant may prefer a private answer, will be dealt
with by post.
Readers who desire to have pedigrees traced, the accuracy of armorial bearings enquired into, or other-
wise to make use of the department, will be charged fees according to the amount of work involved.
Particulars will be supplied on application.
When asking information respecting genealogy or heraldry, it is desirable that the fullest details, so far
as they may be already known to the applicant, should be set forth.
Co-operative Search of Depositions. — The results of
this search have been satisfactory to subscribers ; while only
a very few had no references to the name in which they were
interested, the majority received a very good report, the average
number of references lor each name entered being S'17.
In the new search of wills, of which full particulars appeared
in the last (July) number of The Connoisseur, the average
tor each name should be considerably higher. In every case
the locality will be given, and references to place-names will
also be included in this search.
Oi.and. — You will find an account of the murder of Thomas
Oland, attorney, in the Political Slate of Great Britain, by
A. Bayer and others. There was another Thomas Oland, an
attorney, of Marshfield, who died 10th April, 1759. (See
Gentleman's Magazine, 1759, p. 194.)
There was a family of Oland in Devonshire. A Robert Oland,
son of Robert Oland, ol Uffculme, matriculated at Lincoln
College, Oxford, in 1623, aged 19. He was afterwards rector
of Exeter St. Paul, and of All Hallows-on-the-Walls, Exeter.
Harpham. — Confirmation of the arms of this family was
granted to Alice Harpham, daughter and heiress of Walter Har-
pham, of Marsh Chapel, co. Lincoln, gentleman, but originally
descended out of Northumberland, and wife of Thomas Philips,
of co. Lincoln, esquire, the 24th March, 1626. The arms are,
however, not given in the MS. in the British Museum (Add.
MS. 12,225). Burke gives the arms of this family, described as
of North Chapel, as Gu. a mullet ar. between three fleur-de-lis,
or. Thomas Philips, above-mentioned bore : Az. a chev. be-
tween three doves arg. Crest. — A demi-griffin (colours not given).
There was another family ot the name settled at Marfleet,
co. York, who obtained a confirmation of their arms 9th July,
1657, viz., Sa. a harp ar. stringed, or.
Arms. — The arms you describe are those of Smith, of Charl-
ton, in Fenton, co. Devon ; they were confirmed to Humphrey
Smith in 1 574. The proper description is as follows : — Arg. a
chev. between three eagles displ. sa. The crest is : On a staff
ragulee fessways proper an eagle closed regard, of the same,
beak and legs or.
The following descent may be of interest : —
.... Gore, of =
Woodbury, co. j
Devon.
Henry Whiting, of =
Flaxton, in Ottery
S. Mary, co. Devon.
Maude.
I
John Smith, of Cullompton, = Ellen, daughter and
co. Devon ; died before | heiress.
15S3-
Humphrey Smith.
Michael Silev. — Administration of the goods, etc., ol
Michael Siley, of Tenterden, co. Kent, who died at Rye, was
granted to his brother, John Siley, in March, 1563, but was
revoked by sentence 12th February, 1563-4, and a will proved.
Registered for transmission to Canada at Magazine Post Rates. Printed by Bemrose & Sons Ltd., 4 Snow Hill. London. E.C.. and
Derby and published by the Proprietors. Otto Ltd., at HANOVER BUILDINGS. 35 to 39 MADDOX STREET, LONDON, W., England
Subscriptions-Inland 16 -. Foreign 17 -, to Canada 14 -, per annum. Published the 1st of each month. Published by Gordon & Gotch.
in Australia and New Zealand; by The Central News Agency, in South Afnca ; by Higginbotham & Co.. in Bombay and Calcutta; and
by The International News Co., in U.S.A.
ltlli
A MAGAZINE FOR COLLECTORS
MAY, 1915 ONE SHILLING NET Vol. XLII. No. 165
mm
DANIELL
Decorators and Furnishers
By Special Appointment
to H.M. The King
WAR PRICES
Fine Old Chippendale Sideboard,
vith Pedestals and Urns, finely carved with
fluted border and patera:.
fl
William and Mary Marqueterie Wardrobe.
very finely inlaid.
Hl
A pair of small Etruscan shape
Vases and Covers, marked
Barr, Flight & Barr. Worcester,
marble ground, panels of painted
dead birds, gilt handles.
Height. 71 ins.
Old Dome Top Sheraton Cabinet in
Satinwnod, inlaid border of tulip wood, etc.
In centre. — Old Crown Derby Vase. Apple green ground, painted panel,
Hertford Castle. 12 ins. high.
Sides of Centre.— Pair Old Coalport Vases and Covers, finely painted panels of
birds and flowers, by Randall iV Cooke. 12 ins. high.
Outside.— Pair Old Rockingham Vases. Blue and Gold and groups of flowers. 8* ins. high.
Small Old Derby Figure. Coloured and Gilt.
Old Famille Verte Vase with carved
wood cover and stand, Khang-bi.
The ENTIRE STOCK has been subjected to GENUINE and EXTENSIVE REDUCTIONS,
and we venture to think it would be well w-orth your while to visit Our Galleries at the
earliest moment. A GREAT OPPORTUNITY to purchase.
42, 44, 46, Wigmore Street, W.
(OPPOSITE MESSRS. DEBENHAM & FREERODY'S)
lrui
r
A MAGAZINE FOR COLLECTORS
JUNE, 1915 ONE SHILLING NET Vol. XL1I. No. 1
BY JAMES WARD
THE ALPINE TRAVELLER
AFTER J. NORTHCOTE, R.A.
By Special Appointment
DANIELL
Decorators and Furnishers
to H.M. The Kino
WAR PRICES
A very fine set of four old Queen Anne Chairs
with carved cabriole legs.
Old Chippendale Table, fine
fretwork border frieze.
The ENTIRE STOCK has been subjected to GENUINE and EXTENSIVE REDUCTIONS,
and we venture to think it would be well worth your while to visit Our Galleries at the
earliest moment. A GREAT OPPORTUNITY t i purchase.
42, 44, 46, Wigmore Street, W.
(OPPOSITE MESSRS. DEBENHAM & FREEBODY'S)
THE
Em,
A MAGAZINE FOR COLLECTORS
JULY, 1915 ONE SHILLING NET Vol. XLII. No. 167
LA PETITE FILLE
AU CHIEN
From the Engraving
ev Louis Marin
DANIELL
Decorators and Furnishers
WAR PRICES
By Special Appointment
to H.M. The Kino
+z*m
^:<t
:.!>
'& "»
~ 4 -■■ ■■ -
'<*#-
4rv Wm m,
' ^'-Jm&i
t^'r
Fine Old Brussels Tapestry Verdure, 16th Century, size 11 ft. X 8 ft. 6 ins. Now on view.
The ENTIRE STOCK has been subjected to GENUINE and EXTENSIVE REDUCTIONS,
and we venture to think it would be well worth your while to visit Our Galleries at the
earliest moment. A GREAT OPPORTUNITY to purchase.
42, 44, 46, Wigmore Street, W.
(OPPOSITE MESSRS. DEBENHAM & FREEBODY'S)
THE
MK
'
A MAGAZINE FOR COLLECTORS
AUGUST, 1915 ONE SHILLING NET Vol. XLII. No. 168
J
COFFEE
FROM THE ENGRAVING
by Louis Marin
DANIELL
Decorators and Furnishers
WAR PRICES
By Special Appointment
to H.M. The Kino
(See illustration of Tapestry in last month's Connoisseur.)
42, 44, 46, Wigmore Street, W.
(OPPOSITE MESSRS. DEBENHAM & FREEBODY'S)
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
LIBRARY
1 - * ■|-Hlli