Skip to main content

Full text of "Contributions in science"

See other formats


2 
o 
co 

^ > ’S0T  g ^ ^ 5 

! ES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOIlfUllSNI  NV1N0SH1I WS™ 

co  x co  — (O 


idVdan^Li 

S’ 


O D«-^  _ X^iixS^X  o >v  — X^JlliS^  o 

lliSNI~JNVINOSHllWS  S3  I d Vd a 11  "Tl B R AR  I ES^  SMITHSONIAN-" INSTITUTION  ^ N( 
*2  z r-  _____  s r™  z. 

m 2 ~ /ToTvoX  O ™ j£o£*oX  O 


ro  v w 'yp  xjyAsvj^x  m X^osvAViz  ^ ro 

co  ' = CO  £ CO 

RIES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOlifllliSNI  NVIN0SH1IWS  S3ldVdai1  LI 
z . </)  z <o  z 


LflSNI  NVINOSHXIIAJS  S3ldVH8ll  LIBRARIES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NO 

^ \ CO  — co  = CO 


rM  H 

/•v  ' H 

O 
2 

R I ES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOIXfUUSNI  NVINOSHliiNS  S3!aVH0n  LI 
2 r*  z 


^ ^ - m ^ 

UXSNI  NVINOSHXIWS  S3  I d Vd  9I1~L  IBRARI  ES^SMITHSONIAN-'lNSTITUTION^NO 

Z CO  Z » *• . CO  z ' CO 


X 
co 
O 
2 

2 > W 2 > 

RIES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOIXfUIXSNI  NVINOSHXIWS^SS  I d Vd  9 ll^t-l  I 

<o  5 co  - co 

CU  Z^<s°v7x  Cxi  Lx! 


CO 


O 'vLHi/  X^xixs^x  q " __  q 

.IXSNI~WlNOSHXIWS  SaidVdail^LIBRARI  ESZ  SMITHSONIAN-1  INSTITUTION  ^ NO 
> Z r-  Z r-  Z 


"is 

_ 

m n 3r  xiVASH^  m xoyosHiX'  ~ m 

co  — co  — ± co 

RIES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOIJUUIXSNI  NVINOSHXIWS  S3ldVH8H  LI  I 


CO 


X 

to  .v^ 

O Y'A 

5 ^ S ^ > 

^SMITHSONIAN^  INSTITUTION  NOIlfUllSNI  NVINOSHlIWS^Sa  I UV«  8 IT  LIB  RAF 

CO  ^ to  X CO  “ 


° 

NI^NVINOSHIlWS^SBiava  8 IUI  BRAR  I ESZSMITHSONIAN'J|NSTITUTION^NOIinX! 
r“  > Z r*  2:  1~  Z 


2 m — jzmr/.'*.  no 

i > 

3J 

rn  ^ m m osv^2 

:s  SMITHSONIAN~!NSTlTUTiON  NGiinillSNl~NViNOSHil!NS  53!HV88n  LIBRA! 
<5  z > to  2:  2^5 

s s s < 

x x *%.  -.  dims,,  g 


o 

^ x 

7 § 

Nl  NVIN0SH111AIS  S3  I B V8  8 I 111  BRAR  I E S ^SMITHSON  IAN  ^INSTITUTION  ^NOlifU 
2 \ to  x to  x co 


O X^vosv^Z  ~ o 

2 _j  z -j 

ES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOIlfUllSNI  NVINOSHUINS  SBIBVaeil  LIBRA 
Z ^ z r*  z 

° - 2 m o v m / 


rn  m 

zz  in  zz  w \ ± to 

INI  NVINOSHUINS  S3IL1VH8S1  LIBRARIES  SMITHSONIAN  IN  ION  NOilfU 

Z in  z » , .co  Z to 

< >^2NcX  S , < . S y®v  < S 


o 

_ ^ Wjr 

CO  2 to  * 2 CO  A-  Z 

ES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOlinillSNI  NVINOSHUINS  S3 1 BVB  a 11  LI  BRA 
to  5 ____  to  ~ co  5 

• to  /<g^x  ^ to  A ^ 


o 

N I ^NVINOSHillMS  $3IHV&an^LSBRARI  ES*"  SMITHSONIAN-*  INSTITUTION  ^ NOIlfll 
r-  > z r*  z 

O 


m v'  v^ip  x xjvas^x  rn  x^vosv^z  ^ nt 

to  ■'  _ to  — ± co 

ES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOIlfUllSNI  NVINOSHillMS  S3IBVB  811  LIBRA 

^ ^ „ Z Y to  Z to  z - 


X 


507.73 

CaL«8 


NUMBER  287 
FEBRUARY  10,  1978 


RESULTS  OF  THE  LATHROP  CENTRAL  AFRICAN  REPUBLIC 

EXPEDITION  1976,  ORNITHOLOGY 


By  Herbert  Friedmann 


NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCENC6 


Published  by  the  NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM 
OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007 


SERIAL  PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE 
NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 


Prior  to  November  30,  1973,  publications  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  have  appeared 
under  various  formats — Leaflet  Series,  Museum  Graphic,  Science  Series,  Study  Guides,  Con- 
tributions in  Science,  Contributions  in  History,  Science  Bulletins,  unnumbered  catalogs  of  j 
exhibitions,  and  other  miscellaneous  publications.  The  Museum  now  publishes  the  following 
serials  at  irregular  intervals  as  CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE,  HISTORY  BULLETINS, 
SCIENCE  BULLETINS,  EDUCATION  SERIES,  HISTORY  SERIES,  and  SCIENCE  SE- 
RIES. The  Contributions  are  short  papers  of  octavo  size.  The  Bulletins  are  longer,  compre- 
hensive papers  of  quarto  size.  The  Series  are  papers  of  variable  lengths  of  quarto  or  larger 
size.  Papers  in  each  serial  are  numbered  separately  and  consecutively. 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  contain  articles  in  the  earth  and  life  sciences,  presenting 
results  of  original  research.  Emphasis  is  intended  principally  for  papers  allied  to  biosystematic 
research,  but  other  subjects  and  review-oriented  ones  will  be  considered.  Number  1 was  issued 
on  January  23,  1957.  Contributions  must  be  not  less  than  8 nor  exceed  72  printed  pages. 

INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  AUTHORS 

Acceptance  of  manuscripts  will  be  determined  by  the  significance  of  new  information.  Priority 
will  be  given  to  manuscripts  by  staff  members.  All  manuscripts  must  be  recommended  by  the 
curator  in  charge  of  each  discipline  or  by  the  Editorial  Board.  Manuscripts  must  conform  to 
the  specifications  listed  below.  They  will  be  examined  for  suitability  by  the  Editorial  Board 
and  will  include  review  by  specialists  outside  the  Museum. 

Authors  must  adhere  to  the  International  Code  of  Nomenclature  of  Bacteria  and  Viruses, 
International  Code  of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  and  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature, including  their  respective  recommendations.  Further,  authors  proposing  new  taxa  in 
a CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  must  indicate  that  all  primary  types  have  been  deposited 
in  an  appropriate  scientific  institution  of  their  choice  and  must  cite  that  institution  by  name. 

MANUSCRIPT  FORM. — (1)  In  preparation  of  copy  follow  the  1972  CBE  Style  Manual, 
third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapters  5 and  6.  (2)  Footnotes  should  be  avoided;  acknowledgments 
as  footnotes  will  not  be  accepted.  (3)  An  informative  abstract  must  be  included  for  all  papers. 

(4)  A Spanish  summary  is  required  for  all  manuscripts  dealing  with  Latin  American  subjects. 
Summaries  in  other  languages  are  not  required  but  are  strongly  recommended.  (5)  A differ- 
ential diagnosis  must  accompany  any  newly  proposed  taxon.  (6)  Submit  two  copies  of  manu- 
script. 

ILLUSTRATIONS.— All  illustrations,  including  maps  and  photographs,  will  be  referred  to 
as  figures.  All  illustrations  should  be  of  sufficient  clarity  and  in  proper  proportions  for  reduc- 
tion to  CONTRIBUTIONS  page  size.  In  preparing  illustrations  and  legends  consult  the  1972 
CBE  Style  Manual,  third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapter  5.  Submit  only  illustrations  made  with 
permanent  ink  and  glossy  photographic  prints  of  good  contrast.  Submit  duplicate  copies  of 
all  illustrations.  Original  illustrations  will  be  returned  after  the  manuscript  has  been  published. 

PROOF. — Authors  will  be  sent  galley  proofs  which  should  be  corrected  and  returned  promptly. 

No  changes  or  alterations,  other  than  typesetting  corrections,  will  be  allowed  unless  paid  by 
author.  Requests  for  reprints  may  be  placed  through  the  Editor. 

R.  Edward  Ostermeyer 
Editor 


All  communications  concerning  manuscripts  and  exchange  of  or  purchase  of  publications 
should  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Museum  Publications,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 

Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America  by  Chapman’s  Phototypesetting  on  70#  Patina  Book 


RESULTS  OF  THE  LATHROP  CENTRAL  AFRICAN  REPUBLIC 
EXPEDITION  1976,  ORNITHOLOGY1 

By  Herbert  Friedmann2 


Abstract:  Some  400  specimens  of  94  species  of  birds  were  collected  in  the 
vicinity  of  the  Ouossi  River,  in  the  southern,  forested  part  of  the  Central  African 
Republic,  by  the  Lathrop  Expedition  in  June  1976.  Forty-three  of  these  species 
are  here  recorded  for  the  first  time  from  that  country.  Others,  known  from  there 
from  one  or  a few  earlier  specimens,  constitute  sizeable  extensions  of  previ- 
ously known  ranges.  Aside  from  these  distributional  data,  weights  of  all  the 
birds  are  recorded  as  well  as  the  gonadal  condition  of  each  specimen,  informa- 
tion of  a sort  lacking  until  now  for  the  birds  of  that  portion  of  central  Africa. 


INTRODUCTION 

This  paper  presents  the  results  of  the  Lathrop  Central  African  Republic 
Expedition  in  ornithology  carried  out  in  1976.  All  the  bird  collecting  was  done 
from  one  base  camp,  near  the  Ouossi  River,  about  11  k west  of  Baroua, 
elevation  680  m,  roughly  5°20’N-24°20’E.  This  is  a forested  area  in  the  extreme 
southern  part  of  what  Chapin  (1932:90)  termed  the  Ubangi-Shari  Savanna  Dis- 
trict in  his  map  of  the  faunal  areas  of  Africa.  The  collecting  was  done  by 
Andrew  Williams  and  his  two  African  assistants  and  skinners,  Julius  Kyongo 
and  Philip  Imbayi,  between  31  May  and  22  June  1976.  In  his  report  to  the 
museum,  Williams  wrote  that  the  forests  near  the  camp  site  proved  to  be  of 
three  separate  types  which  he  found  had  small  differences  in  their  bird  life:  1) 
the  mature  riverine  forest  along  the  Ouossi  River,  with  the  largest  trees  of  the 
three,  and,  for  the  most  part,  dense,  lush  undergrowth;  2)  an  area  of  mature, 
but  more  open  forest  away  from  the  river  north  of  the  camp,  somewhat  drier, 
and  with  no  little  streams  running  through  it;  3)  a still  more  open  type  of 
woodland  bordering  on  open  grassland.  The  forests  visited  were  fairly  small  and 
restricted  and  were  some  distance  west  of  the  larger  supposedly  isolated, 
lowland  forest  shown  in  Map  B in  Hall  and  Moreau’s  Atlas  of  African  Ornithol- 
ogy (1970),  but,  judging  from  the  birds  obtained  in  them,  they  were  similar  to,  but 


Review  Committee  for  this  Contribution 
Charles  T.  Collins 
Ralph  W.  Schreiber 
Kenneth  E.  Stager 

2Director  Emeritus,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County,  900  Exposition 
Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 


Figure  1.  Map  of  Africa  showing  the  Central  Africa  Republic  and  the  locality  of  the  present  collection  near 
Baroua. 


1978 


The  Lathrop  Ornithological 
Central  African  Expedition 


3 


somewhat  less  humid  than  the  northern  parts  of  the  great  Congo  forest  of  Zaire 
to  the  south.  During  his  collecting,  involving  both  mist  nets  and  shotgun, 
Williams  became  aware  of  the  absence  of  starlings  and  of  akalats  ( Sheppardia ) in 
all  three  of  these  forested  areas.  It  is  not  conclusive  that  these  birds  do  not  occur 
there,  as  at  least  6 species  of  Lamprotornis  and  1 of  Sheppardia  have  been 
reported  earlier  from  the  Central  African  Republic,  but  they  cannot  be  abundant 
near  the  Ouossi  River,  or  they  would  have  been  noted. 

A collection  of  400  specimens  of  94  species,  made  during  a little  over  3 
weeks  in  the  field,  cannot  be  looked  upon  as  a complete  representation  of  a 
local,  tropical  forest  bird  fauna.  However,  it  is  significant  in  filling  gaps  in  our 
knowledge  of  the  distribution  of  central  African  birds.  The  collecting  was 
confined  almost  wholly  to  the  forested  areas,  but  a few  birds  were  taken  in  the 
open  grasslands  immediately  adjacent  to  them.  The  collector  carefully  and 
conscientiously  recorded  in  detail  the  colors  of  the  soft  parts  (eye,  bill,  bare 
skin  areas  and  feet),  as  well  as  the  weight,  the  state  of  the  gonads  (unmeasured) 
and  the  contents  of  the  stomach  of  every  specimen.  The  weights  and  gonadal 
condition  reported  here  are  the  first  for  their  area.  The  colors  of  the  soft  parts 
and  the  stomach  contents  are  included  only  for  species  of  which  Chapin  ( 1932- 
1954)  had  little  material,  and  only  for  some  species  of  special  interest  has 
systematic  discussion  been  thought  useful. 

In  evaluating  the  extensions  of  known  ranges  of  a large  number  of  the 
included  species,  the  maps  of  each  of  the  passerines  in  Hall  and  Moreau’s  atlas 
are  of  the  first  importance.  The  maps  in  Mackworth-Praed  and  Grant’s  two 
volumes  on  the  birds  of  west-central  and  western  Africa  show  mere  black 
swatches  to  indicate  ranges,  and  these  are  not  precise  in  the  sense  that  are 
those  of  Hall  and  Moreau,  which  attempt  to  show  every  locality  of  record.  In 
all  such  species  maps,  where  the  swatches  suggest  distributional  limits  beyond 
those  given  by  Hall  and  Moreau,  and  where  there  are  no  published  records  in 
the  earlier  literature,  I have  assumed  they  were  not  based  on  actual  specimens 
or  on  definite  observations,  and  have  been  guided  basically  by  the  correspond- 
ing maps  in  Hall  and  Moreau.  Assuming  a period  of  three  years  from  the 
completion  to  the  publication  of  these  maps,  I have  gone  back  to  1967  in  my 
search  of  the  literature  for  possible  unmapped  records  from  the  Central  African 
Republic. 

Table  1 lists  birds  in  the  Lathrop  Expedition’s  collection  which  are  the 
first  records  in  print  for  their  species  from  the  Central  African  Republic.  A 
number  of  others  fill  sizeable  gaps  in  the  specimen  records  mapped  by  Hall  and 
Moreau,  but  are  not  new  for  that  political  area. 

The  systematic  order  and  the  nomenclature  used  in  this  paper  is  that  of 
Mackworth-Praed  and  Grant  (1970-1973),  the  most  recent  complete  work  on 
the  birds  of  western  and  central  Africa.  In  a few  species  it  has  been  deemed 
better  not  to  follow  their  treatment.  Further,  the  generic  and  specific  names 
and  sequence  have  been  changed,  where  needed,  to  conform  with  the  Refer- 
ence List  of  the  Birds  of  the  World,  by  Morony,  Bock  and  Farrand  (1975). 


4 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  287 


TABLE  1 

Species  of  birds  hitherto  unreported  from  the  Central  African  Republic. 


Pachycoccyx  audeberti 
Cuculus  clamosus  clamosus 
Cuculus  clamosus  gabonensis 
Cercococcyx  mechowi 
Alcedo  leucogaster  leopoldi 
Halcyon  badia 

Halcyon  malimbica  malimbica 
Tockus  hartlaubi  grand 
Pogoniulus  scolopaceus  flavisquamatus 
Pogoniulus  bilineatus  leucolaema 
Pogoniulus  subsulphureus  flavimentum 
Pogoniulus  atroflavus 
Trachyphonus  purpuratus  purpuratus 
Melignomon  zenkeri 
Indicator  maculatus  stictithorax 
Indicator  exilis  exilis 
Melichneutes  robustus 
Campethera  nivosa  herberti 
Smithornis  capensis  camarunensis 
Pitta  angolensis  longipennis 
Pycnonotus  gracilirostris  chagwensis 
Baeopogon  indicator  indicator 


Erythropygia  leucosticta  collsi 
Cossypha  natalensis  intensa 
Alethe  diademata  woosnami 
Alethe  poliocephala  carruthersi 
Trichastoma  albipectus  albipectus 
Trichastoma  rufipenne  rufipenne 
Ptyrticus  turdinus 

Camaroptera  superciliaris  flavigularis 
Camaroptera  chloronota  toroensis 
Macrosphenus  flavicans  hypochondriacus 
Platysteira  castanea  castanea 
Trochocercus  nigromitratus 
Anthreptes  rectirostris  tephrolaema 
Nectarinia  seimundi  traylori 
Nectarinia  cyanolaema  octaviae 
Nigrita  bicolor  brunnescens 
Nigrita  canicapilla  canicapilla 
Mandingoa  nitidula  schlegeli 
Spermophaga  ruficapilla  ruficapilla 
Malimbus  nitens  microrhynchus 
Dicrurus  atripennis 


SPECIES  ACCOUNTS 

Species  here  reported  for  the  first  time  from  the  Central  African  Republic 
are  marked  with  an  asterisk. 

Family  Accipitridae 

Accipiter  tachiro  canescens  (Chapin).  — Two  adult  males  and  one  young, 
but  fully  grown  female  of  this  hawk  were  collected  2,  13  and  16  June.  The 
subspecies  must  be  commoner  in  the  Ouossi  River  area  than  might  have  been 
expected,  as  it  has  been  a seldom  collected  bird  in  most  parts  of  its  range.  The 
female  was  in  worn  plumage  with  a few  adult  feathers  coming  in  on  the  upper 
wing  coverts,  and  also  had  a very  few  pale  chestnut  feathers  showing  on  the 
sides  of  the  otherwise  white  breast  and  abdomen.  The  two  males  weighed  194 
and  205  g,  the  female  325  g;  both  adults  had  enlarged  gonads.  One  of  the 
specimens  was  taken  in  swampy  riverine  forest,  one  in  open  forest  under- 
growth, and  one  in  dense  undergrowth  of  mature  forest. 


1978 


The  Lathrop  Ornithological 
Central  African  Expedition 


5 


Family  Columbidae 

Turtur  tympanistria  tympanistria  (Temminck  and  Knip).  — One  male, 
testes  enlarged,  5 June,  weight  67  g. 

Turtur  brehmeri  brehmeri  (Hartlaub).  — The  Blue-headed  Dove  must  be 
fairly  common  in  the  dense  forest  around  the  Ouossi  River  as  4 examples  were 
obtained  on  four  different  days,  1,2,  10  and  16  June.  Two  of  them  had  enlarged 
gonads,  the  other  two  had  small,  inactive  ones;  1 male  weighed  120  g;  the  3 
females  105,  107  and  130  g respectively. 

Family  Cuculidae 

Clamator  levaillantii  Swainson.  — This  crested  cuckoo  is  not  a bird  of  the 
true  forest,  but  does  come  into  the  margins  of  such  areas.  One  adult  male  was 
captured  in  a mist  net  in  the  undergrowth  of  mature  forest  8 June;  testes 
somewhat  enlarged;  weight  110  g. 

*Pachycoccyx  audeberti  (Schlegel).  — Because  of  the  still  limited  number 
of  records  of  this  scarce  cuckoo,  it  may  be  noted  that  Andrew  Williams  saw, 
but  was  unable  to  collect,  one  just  outside  the  forest. 

Cuculus  solitarius  solitarius  Stephens.  — One  adult  male,  testes  not  en- 
larged, was  taken  in  open  forest,  bordering  grassland,  7 June;  weight  83  g. 

*CucuIus  clamosus  gabonensis  Lafresnaye.  — One  adult  female,  ovary 
enlarged,  was  taken  in  open  forest  8 June;  weight  78  g.  This  specimen,  together 
with  one  of  C.  solitarius,  collected  the  day  before,  raise  again  the  old  doubts  as 
to  the  nature  of  the  relationship  of  the  two  species.  Furthermore,  Williams 
wrote  that  he  also  saw,  but  did  not  obtain,  one  pure  black  clamosus.  Were  it 
not  for  the  fact  that  in  their  vocalisms,  the  coloration  of  their  egg  shells,  and 
their  different  choice  of  hosts,  clamosus  and  solitarius,  at  least  in  southern  and 
eastern  Africa,  are  quite  distinct,  one  might  be  tempted  to  regard  them  as 
variables  within  a single  broadly  phenotypic  species.  This  is,  however,  negated 
by  these  considerations  and  the  only  possible  conclusion  is  that  the  two  species 
may  have  had  a common  origin  in  the  forested  regions  of  central  Africa  where 
the  persistent,  present  population  still  reveals  the  phenotypic  spectrum  of  the 
ancestral  stock  (including  such  variables  as jacksoni,  gabonensis  and  mabirae). 
It  is  known  to  occur,  not  far  to  the  south,  in  the  forests  of  Zaire.  The  all  black 
individual  seen  by  Williams  must  have  beenC.  clamosus  clamosus  of  southern 
Africa,  a race  known  to  migrate  north  after  the  southern  breeding  season  to  the 
Congo  forests  and  even  as  far  north  as  southern  Ethiopia.  It  too,  is  a first 
record  for  the  Central  African  Republic. 

*Cercococcyx  mechowi  Cabanis.  — The  Dusky  Long-tailed  Cuckoo  is  gen- 
erally thought  of  as  an  uncommon,  or,  at  least,  elusive  bird,  “ . . . more  easily 
heard  than  seen”  (Mackworth-Praed  and  Grant,  1970:369),  of  the  central  Afri- 
can forests,  but  it  must  be  anything  but  scarce  in  the  Ouossi  River  area,  as  five 
examples,  all  females,  were  obtained  there,  1,  10,  12  and  17  June.  One  of  these 
was  an  immature  bird,  the  others  were  adult;  some  were  shot  from  as  high  as  40 


6 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  287 


feet  up  in  trees  while  others  were  taken  in  mist  nets  set  in  the  undergrowth.  The 
weights  of  the  adults  were  54,  55,  59  and  61  g;  the  young  bird  61  g.  One  bird  had 
the  ovary  enlarged;  the  others  had  small  ovaries. 

Family  Caprimulgidae 

Scotornis  climacurus  sclateri  Bates.  — One  adult  male,  testes  enlarged,  5 
June,  weight  44  g,  taken  in  open  country  near  the  forest  edge. 

Family  Trogonidae 

Apaloderma  narina  brachyurum  Chapin.  — One  adult  male,  testes  slightly 
enlarged,  weight  63  g,  10  June,  was  collected  in  mature  riverine  forest  with 
open  undergrowth. 


Family  Alcedinidae 

Alee  do  quadribrachys  guentheri  Sharpe.  — Four  specimens,  10  to  18 
June,  were  taken  in  mist  nets  over  a small  stream  in  riverine  forest;  all  had 
small,  inactive  gonads;  2 males  weighed  33  and  36  g,  2 females  32  g each. 

*Alcedo  leucogaster  leopoldi  (Dubois).  — Between  6 and  16  June,  4 males 
and  3 females  were  taken  in  mist  nets  set  in  swampy  riverine  forest.  The  birds 
had  gonads  ranging  from  not  enlarged  to  slightly  so;  weights  were  12,  12,  12  and 
14.5  g for  the  males;  14,  14  and  16  for  the  females.  The  present  specimens  agree 
in  coloration  and  in  size  with  a series  from  western  Uganda,  but  show  less 
diversity  in  the  purplish  or  greenish-blue  bars  on  the  coronal  feathers.  In  the 
birds  from  two  forests  in  Uganda,  the  Bwamba  in  extreme  western  Uganda, 
and  the  Malabigambo  near  the  western  shore  of  Lake  Victoria,  it  was  found 
(Friedmann  1969:4)  that  there  were  almost  two  color  phases  in  this  character 
and  that  there  were  no  intermediates.  This  is  not  the  case  with  the  Ouossi 
River  birds,  some  of  which  actually  have  both  purplish  and  greenish-blue  bars 
on  different  feathers. 

Myioceyx  lecontei  (Cassin).  — Between  6 and  15  June,  6 specimens  of  the 
Dwarf  Kingfisher  were  netted  in  dense  riverine  forest  undergrowth.  None 
were  in  breeding  condition;  weights  10  to  10.5  g (4  males),  10  and  12  g (2 
females).  Comparison  of  these  specimens  with  a long  series  in  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Museum  from  western  Uganda,  including  a number  from  the  Budongo 
Forest  (type  locality  of  van  Someren’s  proposed  race  M.  /.  ugandae ) show  no 
differences  in  dimensions  or  in  coloration.  The  small  blue  coronal  spots  that 
were  the  basis  of  ugandae  are  by  no  means  constant  in  Uganda  birds,  and  are 
present  in  2 of  our  5 adults  from  Ouossi  River.  I conclude  that  this  species  has 
no  recognizable  races. 

Ispidina  picta  picta  (Boddaert).  — The  Pigmy  Kingfisher  is  represented  by 
2 males  and  1 female  taken  16  and  19  June  in  mist  nets  set  in  swampy  riverine 
forest;  all  in  non-breeding  state,  or,  at  most,  with  slight  gonadal  enlargement; 
weights  12  and  12.5  g (males);  11  g (female). 


1978 


The  Lathrop  Ornithological 
Central  African  Expedition 


7 


*Halcyon  badia  Verreaux.  — One  female,  ovary  not  enlarged,  was  netted 
in  the  forest  undergrowth  18  June.  Comparison  with  a dozen  west  Uganda 
specimens  in  the  Los  Angeles  County  Museum,  including  a series  of  topotypes 
of  budongoensis  from  the  Budongo  Forest,  shows  no  reason  for  recognizing  that 
subspecies.  It  is  sufficient  to  note  a general  clinal  increase  in  size  toward  the 
eastern  parts  of  the  range  of  the  species.  Our  specimen  weighed  47  g.  This 
specimen  was  caught  in  mist  nets  which  suggest  that  Mackworth-Praed  and 
Grant  (1970:431)  were  in  error  when  they  wrote  that  this  species  usually 
“.  . . keeps  twenty  or  thirty  feet  from  the  ground.” 

*Halcyon  malimbica  malimbica  (Shaw).  — Four  specimens,  2 of  each  sex 
were  taken  (3  in  mist  nets)  in  the  riverine  forest  undergrowth,  1 to  15  June,  all 
with  slightly  enlarged  gonads;  weights  83  and  90  g (males);  83  (both  females). 

Family  Bucerotidae 

*Tockus  hartlaubi  grand  (Hartert).  — A breeding  male,  one  of  two  birds 
seen  about  60  feet  up  in  a tree,  catching  insects  on  the  wing,  was  taken  3 June  in 
lush  forest;  weight  135  g.  This  specimen  agrees  in  coloration  with  another  male 
in  the  Los  Angeles  County  Museum  from  Bwamba  Forest,  western  Uganda,  but 
has  a much  longer  bill  (culmen  to  base  74  mm;  63  in  the  Bwamba  bird).  There  is 
some  difference  in  the  wing  and  tail  lengths  of  the  two,  but  the  Uganda  bird  is  in 
very  abraded  plumage,  especially  in  its  remiges  and  rectrices,  which  naturally 
affects  its  dimensions. 

Family  Capitonidae 

*Pogoniulus  scolopaceus  flavisquamatus  (Verreaux).  — One  female, 
ovary  not  enlarged,  weight  13  g,  was  netted  in  dense  undergrowth  in  degraded 
forest,  5 June. 

Pogoniulus  chrysoconus  chrysoconus  (Temminck).  — Three  male  exam- 
ples of  the  Yellow-fronted  Tinker-bird  were  collected,  17  and  19  June,  in  mist 
nets  set  at  a fruiting  tree  at  the  forest  edge;  weights  10,  1 1 and  11.5  g;  one  of 
them  had  large  testes,  the  others  small  ones.  They  agree  in  size  and  coloration 
with  other  specimens  in  the  Los  Angeles  County  Museum  from  the  Ivory  Coast, 
Uganda  and  western  Kenya. 

"Pogoniulus  bilineatus  leucolaema  (Verreaux).  — Four  males,  2 with 
large,  2 with  small  gonads,  were  collected  8 to  18  June  in  the  forest  edge; 
weights  10.5  to  12  g (average  11.1).  These  specimens  are  slightly  paler  below 
than  a long  series  of  P.  b.  mfumbiri,  less  yellowish  below  than  P.  b.  sharpei 
from  the  Ivory  Coast. 

* Pogoniulus  sub  sulphur  eus  flavimentum  (Verreaux).  — The  Yellow- 
throated  Tinker-bird  was  common  in  the  Ouossi  River  area,  where  3 females  in 
non-breeding  state,  and  2 males  with  enlarged  testes,  were  collected  15  to  17 
June;  weights  9 and  10.5  g (males);  10  g (females).  All  were  collected  while 
feeding  in  fruiting  forest  trees.  These  specimens  agree  in  size  and  coloration 
with  a long  series  in  the  Los  Angeles  County  Museum  from  western  Uganda. 


8 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  287 


*Pogoniulus  atroflavus  (Sparrman).  — The  Red-rumped  Tinker-bird  was 
found  to  be  very  common  in  the  Ouossi  River  area,  and  some  13  specimens 
were  collected  12  to  19  June;  6 males,  7 females,  gonads  enlarged  in  4 individu- 
als, small  in  the  others;  weights  17  to  21.5  g (average  18.1)  in  males,  14  to  20  g 
(average  17.5)  in  females.  Three  of  the  birds  were  caught  in  mist  nets,  but  the 
majority  (10)  were  shot  as  they  were  feeding  well  up  in  fruiting  trees. 

*Trachyphonus  purpuratus  purpuratus  Verreaux.  — The  Yellow-billed 
Barbet  was  met  with  twice,  9 and  16  June,  in  the  riverine  forest;  1 male  with 
slight  testicular  enlargement  and  1 female  with  a small  ovary;  weights  87  g 
(male),  89  g (female).  These  examples  are  placed  with  the  nominate  race  of  the 
species,  but  it  is  not  clear  that  T.  p.  elgonensis  is  constantly  different.  That 
eastern  subspecies  is  said  to  have  the  whitish  edges  of  the  feathers  of  the  throat 
and  foreneck  less  well  marked,  but  a very  long  series  in  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Museum  from  the  forests  of  western  Uganda  suggests  that  this  charac- 
ter is  one  that  appears  as  the  feathers  become  abraded.  Some  of  the  Uganda 
birds  have  these  edges  as  well  developed  as  in  our  Ouossi  birds,  while  others 
have  no  sign  of  them.  Unfortunately,  we  have  insufficient  west  African  mate- 
rial for  comparison,  but  it  would  seem  that  only  specimens  in  fresh  plumage  of 
the  two  can  be  expected  to  demonstrate  the  racial  difference.  The  distribu- 
tional maps  in  Mackworth-Praed  and  Grant  (1970:553)  suggest  that  they  had  no 
records  from  the  area  we  are  concerned  with  in  this  report,  but  their  range  for 
T.  p.  purpuratus  comes  nearer  to  it  than  that  of  T.  p.  elgonensis.  White 
(1965:271)  writes  that  the  nominate  race  intergrades  in  the  upper  Congo  with 
elgonensis,  and  it  would  seem  that  this  is  true  as  well  in  the  Central  African 
Republic. 

Family  Indicatoridae 

*Melignomon  zenkeri  Reichenow.  — One  specimen  of  this  rarely  col- 
lected species  was  caught  in  a mist  net  1 m above  the  ground  in  dense  forest 
undergrowth  by  a small  stream  along  the  Ouossi  River,  2 June;  a female  in 
breeding  condition,  the  largest  ovarian  follicle  2.5  mm;  bill  dark  horn  brown, 
the  lower  base  yellowish;  iris  dark  brown;  feet  pale  olivaceous  yellow;  eye  skin 
dark  gray;  weight  24  g.  The  specimen  agrees  in  coloration  with  another  breed- 
ing female  from  Bwamba  (Los  Angeles  County  Museum  #66898),  extreme 
western  Uganda  (July  9),  but  is  smaller,  this  being  especially  noticeable  in  the 
bill  and  tail.  The  Ouossi  bird  measures:  wing  76,  tail  47.6,  culmen  from  the  base 
10.1  mm;  the  Bwamba  one:  wing  77.6,  tail  53.7,  culmen  from  base  11.8  mm, 
weight  25  g. 

The  stomach  of  the  present  specimen  contained  a sizeable  quantity  of 
finely  ground  or  comminuted  grayish  waxy  material  mixed  with  tiny  black  bits 
of  insect  fragments,  very  similar  to  that  reported  in  detail  from  the  earlier 
Bwamba  specimen  (Friedmann  1968:281-282),  which  was  determined  to  be 
scale  insect  wax,  not  the  paler,  more  yellowish  beeswax  usually  present  in  the 
stomachs  of  honey-guides  of  the  genus  Indicator. 


1978 


The  Lathrop  Ornithological 
Central  African  Expedition 


9 


The  fact  that  the  genus  Melignomon  is  intermediate  in  its  characters  be- 
tween Indicator  and  Prodotiscus,  but  somewhat  more  like  the  latter,  makes  it 
of  interest  to  note  that  while  taking  the  present  specimen  out  of  the  mist  net, 
Andrew  Williams  found  it  to  have  a very  “hard”  body  like  that  of  an  Indicator, 
not  like  the  softer,  “delicate”  body  of  a Prodotiscus. 

* Indicator  maculatus  stictithorax  Reichenow.  — The  Spotted  Honey- 
guide  was  found  to  be  very  common  in  the  forests  along  the  Ouossi  River,  and 
16  males,  17  females,  and  1 unsexed  specimen  were  collected,  31  May  to  19 
June.  While  most  of  the  birds  had  no,  or  only  little,  gonadal  enlargement,  2 
taken  on  31  May  were  marked  as  breeding  and  1 other,  collected  3 June,  had  an 
enlarged  ovary.  Most  of  the  specimens  were  caught  in  mist  nets  placed  near 
wild  bees’  nests,  baited  with  bits  of  beecomb.  The  weights  of  the  birds  varied 
from  43  to  51  g (average  50.6)  in  males;  40  to  50.5  g (average  40.6)  in  females. 
Almost  all  the  birds  had  beeswax  in  their  stomachs,  many  also  had  insect 
fragments,  and  one  had  2 small  seeds  as  well  as  insect  parts.  The  condition  of 
the  plumage  varies  from  extremely  worn  to  fresh,  but  no  correlation  between 
gonadal  state  and  feather  wear  could  be  discerned. 

The  above  series  presented  an  opportunity  to  compare  central  African 
with  western  Ugandan  (Bwamba)  birds.  The  more  eastern  population  averages 
slightly  larger,  but  the  limits  of  size  variation  are  about  the  same  in  our 
Bwamba  and  Ouossi  River  birds  (no  topotypical  stictithorax,  described  from 
Cameroon,  have  been  available  for  direct  comparison).  Thus,  males  have  wing 
lengths  of  from  95.5  to  106.5  mm  (average  101 .5)  in  12  Bwamba  specimens,  95.0 
to  104  mm  average  (99.9)  in  17  Ouossi  River  birds;  females  have  wing  lengths 
of  95  to  98.8  mm  (average  96.4)  in  1 1 Bwamba  birds,  92.1  to  100.3  mm  (average 
90.4)  in  16  Ouossi  River  examples. 

A general  clinal  increase  in  size  occurs  in  the  species  as  a whole  from  west 
to  east.  Mackworth-Praed  and  Grant  (1970:558)  write  that  nominate  maculatus 
(Gambia  to  Nigeria)  have  wing  lengths  of  97  to  103  mm,  stictithorax  100  to  107 
mm.  I have  found  no  specimen  with  wings  as  long  as  1 10  mm,  the  maximum  for 
stictithorax  given  by  Malbrandt  and  Maclatchy  (1949:275). 

According  to  Chapin  (1939:548)  typical  maculatus  differs  from  stictithorax 
in  being  a little  darker  on  the  crown,  the  cheeks  and  malar  region  unstreaked, 
dark  olive,  and  the  abdomen  less  yellowish.  Judging  from  our  large  series  of 
stictithorax  it  would  seem  that  the  abdominal  coloration  is  too  variable  to  be  of 
much  diagnostic  value,  but  all  of  our  59  birds  have  streaks  on  the  cheeks  and 
malar  region. 

Indicator  indicator  (Sparrman).  — The  Greater  Honey-guide  is  repre- 
sented by  4 adult  males,  1 adult  female,  3 immature  birds  of  both  sexes,  taken  1 
to  15  June,  all  with  little  or  no  gonadal  enlargement,  weights  45  to  50  g (average 
48)  in  the  adult  males,  52  g in  the  adult  female;  45  and  46  g in  2 immature 
females,  54  g in  an  immature  male.  The  specimens  were  taken  at  the  edge  of  the 
forest,  some  of  them  in  mist  nets  near  wild  bees’  nests;  they  were  in  remarka- 
bly fresh,  unfaded  plumage. 


10 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  287 


Clancey  (1970:378)  described  a race  of  this  honey-guide  from  southern 
Mozambique,  I.  indicator  inquisitor,  said  to  be  characterized  by  smaller  size; 
wing  length  of  males  105  to  110.5  mm,  as  against  113  to  120  in  males  of  the 
nominate  subspecies.  While  the  validity  of  a southeast  African  race  may  seem 
tangential  to  a study  of  a series  from  the  Central  African  Republic,  it  does 
affect  the  present  use  of  a binomial  for  our  specimens.  Our  males  from  Ouossi 
River  have  wing  lengths  of  from  104  to  107.8  mm  (average  106.4),  and  our 
comparative  material  from  Kenya  have  wings  1 03  to  1 09.8  mm ; in  other  words  all 
are  within  the  size  range  given  for  the  race  inquisitor;  one  male  from  the  Ivory 
Coast  has  a measurement  of  only  102.5  mm.  The  wide  geographic  spread  of 
small  /.  indicator  makes  one  ask  whether  typical  indicator  may  be  a large  race 
confined  to  the  Cape  Province,  an  area  from  which  no  material  has  been 
available  for  comparison.  However,  Clancey  stated  that  coastal  Kenya  birds  are 
equally  large  and  must  be  considered  /.  indicator.  Our  coastal  Kenya  adult 
males  (Lamu,  Tana  River  and  Sokoke)  have  wing  lengths  of  from  104.5  to  107.0 
mm.  The  mensural  data  given  by  Irwin  and  Benson  (1966:16)  for  birds  from 
various  parts  of  Zambia  are  similarly  difficult  to  account  for  in  terms  of 
geographic  subspeciation,  although  in  a later  paper  Clancey  (1972:181-182) 
extended  the  range  of  inquisitor  to  include  . . the  valley  of  Luangwa,  Zambia, 

and  that  of  the  lower  Shire  R.,  Malawi,  and,  perhaps,  on  the  coast  of  Tanzania 
and  the  off-shore  islands  of  Mafia,  Zanzibar  and  Pemba.”  However,  it  seems 
unlikely  that  this  supposed  race  could  also  extend  to  the  Central  African 
Republic  and  even  to  the  Ivory  Coast,  and  until  further  clarification,  it  seems 
better  to  consider  the  species  monotypic. 

Indicator  minor  riggenbachi  Zedlitz.  — The  Lesser  Honey-guide  was 
found  to  be  very  common  along  the  Ouossi  River  in  open  areas  at  the  edges  of 
the  forest;  12  males  and  3 females  were  collected  3 to  18  June;  all  with  little  or 
no  gonadal  enlargement;  weights  27.5  to  34  g (average  30.4)  in  the  males,  27  to 
30  g (average  28.3)  in  the  females.  Many  of  the  specimens  were  caught  in  mist 
nets  near  wild  bees’  nests,  and  most  (1 1)  of  them  had  beeswax  as  well  as  insect 
fragments  in  their  stomachs.  This  series  agrees  very  closely  with  many  others 
from  extreme  western  Uganda,  and  does  not  show  any  trend  toward  the  ventral 
pallor  of  I.  minor  alexanderi,  the  race  that  occurs  to  the  northwest  of  their  area, 
and  still  less  to  the  still  paler  I.  minor  senegalensis  with  which  White  (1965:275) 
has  united  alexanderi. 

* Indicator  exilis  exilis  (Cassin).  — The  Least  Honey-guide  must  be  a 
very  common  bird  in  the  forest  along  the  Ouossi  River,  as  in  17  days,  2 to  19 
June,  the  expedition  obtained  a series  of  29  specimens  (17  males,  12  adult,  5 
immature;  and  10  females,  6 adult,  4 immature;  and  2 birds  of  unrecorded  sex). 
As  might  be  expected  from  the  geographic  location  of  the  area,  the  birds  are 
somewhat  intermediate  between  nominate  exilis  and  the  slightly  larger,  more 
eastern,  pachyrhynchus  (Bahr-el-Ghazal  province  of  the  Sudan  to  eastern 
Zaire,  Uganda  and  western  Kenya),  but  seem  better  placed  with  the  former 
subspecies.  Thus,  the  wing  lengths  of  our  12  adult  males  vary  from  68  to  80.5 
mm  (average  75.9);  6 adult  females  66.2  to  71.2  mm  (average  68).  Chapin 


1978 


The  Lathrop  Ornithological 
Central  African  Expedition 


11 


(1962:41-42)  noted  wing  lengths  of  72  to  79.5  mm  for  male  exilis,  65  to  70  for 
females;  while  for  pachyrhynchus  he  gave  wing  lengths  of  75.5  to  84  mm  for 
males,  68  to  76  mm  for  females.  In  the  Itombwe  area  of  eastern  Zaire, 
Prigogine  (1971:101-102)  found  the  two  races  to  be  altitudinally  distinct.  I.  e. 
exilis  below  1200  m,  and  I.  e.  pachyrhynchus  above  1800  m,  a conclusion 
difficult  to  accept.  In  this  connection  I have  reviewed  and  measured  all  the 
specimens  in  the  Los  Angeles  County  Museum  collections  from  the  Impenetr- 
able Forest,  southwest  Uganda,  and  find  them  all  to  be  pachyrhynchus;  they 
were  collected  at  altitudes  of  from  4000  to  7500  feet.  In  the  report  on  the  birds 
of  the  Impenetrable  Forest  (Keith,  Twomey,  Friedmann,  and  Williams 
1969:14)  only  /.  exilis  exilis  is  listed  and  only  from  4000  feet.  Some  of  our 
specimen  records  from  higher  elevations  were  collected  too  late  for  inclusion  in 
that  paper,  and  at  that  time  pachyrhynchus  was  considered  not  different 
enough  from  exilis  to  recognize  by  name.  The  two  races  are  based,  it  is  true,  on 
only  average  differences;  Mackworth-Praed  and  Grant  (1970:566)  also  consider 
them  as  one  subspecies.  However,  in  view  of  Chapin’s  long  experience  with 
these  birds  in  the  field  and  museum,  I am  inclined  to  follow  him  in  keeping  the 
two  apart. 

The  10  immature  examples  of  our  present  series  are  noticeably  duskier 
below  than  the  adults,  and  lack  the  black  malar  stripe  and  the  white  loreal 
streak  of  the  older  birds.  Identical  differences  between  young  and  adult  birds 
are  also  present  in  a still  larger  series  of  specimens  from  Bwamba  and  other 
forests  of  extreme  western  Uganda.  The  young  birds  average  slightly  smaller 
than  the  adults;  their  wing  length  averages  72.5  mm  in  the  males,  67  mm  in  the 
females.  Of  the  12  adult  males  in  our  Ouossi  River  series,  none  had  testes  more 
than  slightly  enlarged;  of  the  6 adult  females,  all  but  1 had  enlarged  ovaries,  an 
anomalous  situation. 

Many  of  our  specimens  were  collected  in  mist  nets  near  wild  bees’  nests  at 
the  edge  of  the  forest,  but  a few  were  shot  while  feeding  on  fruits  well  up  in 
small  trees.  Most  of  them  had  beeswax  and  insect  fragments  in  their  stomachs, 
but  2 of  them,  both  immature,  had  small  fruits  as  well.  This  is  the  first  time  this 
Honey-guide  (or  any  of  its  congeners)  has  been  found  to  eat  small  fruits,  an 
unexpected  diet  for  a Honey-guide.  In  my  earlier  (1955:227)  survey  of  the 
feeding  habits  of  this  species,  I noted  that  a seed  of  unknown  kind  had  been 
found  in  the  gizzard  of  one  specimen,  but  otherwise  the  stomach  contents  were 
invariably  insects  and  beeswax  (and  probably  honey).  The  12  adult  males 
weighed  from  16  to  20.5  g (average  18.2),  the  adult  females  12  to  17.5  g (average 
15.9);  immature  males  16  to  18  g (average  17.5);  immature  female  17  g. 

The  use  of  mist  nets  placed  near  bees’  nests  as  a method  of  obtaining 
specimens  of  this  Honey-guide  was  well  documented  by  Archer  and  Glen 
(1969:1-2)  in  their  work  in  the  Malabigambo  Forest,  Uganda.  They  concluded 
that  their  success  was  due  to  the  fact  that  the  birds  made  periodic  visits  to  all 
the  wild  bees’  nests  known  to  them.  Despite  there  being  a total  of  over  2500 
yards  of  mist  nets  used  in  the  month’s  work  in  that  forest,  not  a single  Honey- 
guide  was  netted  except  in  the  immediate  vicinity  of  the  bees’  nests,  although 


12 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  287 


in  the  Namalala  Forest  they  did  catch  one  in  a net  "set  at  random"  (but 
possibly  not  very  far  from  a bees'  nest  unknown  to  the  collectors). 

The  receipt  of  this  fine  series,  added  to  the  great  number  of  specimens 
from  western  Uganda,  now  in  the  Los  Angeles  collections,  has  caused  me  to 
restudy  the  variation  of  I.  exilis.  This  leaves  me  with  serious  doubt  as  to  the 
identification  of  one  example  (LACM  #66903)  from  Ntandi,  Bwamba  Forest, 
Uganda,  previously  published  (Friedmann  and  Williams  1968: 1 8 ; 197 1:33)  as  I. 
pumilio.  It  now  seems  that  minimal  specimens  of  exilis  are  just  as  small  as 
pumilio,  and  indeed,  can  hardly  be  distinguished  from  the  latter,  without  care- 
ful study.  Thus,  the  Ntandi  bird  has  a bill  slightly  larger  than  in  pumilio,  more 
like  exilis,  to  which  species  it  is  now  identified  even  though  it  is  actually 
exceeded  by  some  examples  of  pumilio  in  its  wing  length,  tail  length  and  body 
weight.  The  minute  bill  of  the  latter  species  seems  to  be  its  most  reliable  diag- 
nostic character;  to  be  appreciated,  the  bills  of  exilis  and  pumilio  should  be 
examined  with  a hand  lens,  preferably  from  the  underside.  Although  the 
specimen  from  Kakamega  Forest,  western  Kenya,  that  Williams  and  I previ- 
ously (1965:21-22)  decided  was  I.  pumilio,  is  not  available  for  restudy,  I began 
to  wonder  if  it  too  might  be  a minimal  I.  exilis.  However,  Prigogine  writes  me 
(25  July  1977)  that  he  recently  examined  it  and  one  other  Kakamega  specimen 
in  the  Nairobi  museum,  and  found  them  to  be  I.  pumilio,  of  an  undescribed 
subspecies,  which,  I hope,  he  will  elucidate  in  his  next  paper.  Zimmerman’s 
report  of  pumilio  from  the  Kakamega  Forest  (1972:295)  was  based  solely  on  a 
sight  record. 

While  collecting  the  present  series,  Williams  had  in  mind  the  possibility  of 
some  of  them  being/,  willcocksi,  as  I also  had  when  studying  them,  but  all  are  /. 
exilis. 

*Melichneutes  robustus  (Bates).  — The  Lyre-tailed  Honey-guide  is  still  so 
scarce  a bird  in  museum  collections  (not,  apparently,  in  nature)  that  additional 
specimens  are  examined  with  much  interest.  Two  adults,  one  of  each  sex,  were 
caught  in  mist  nets  set  in  open  forest  near  a wild  bees’  nest,  and  baited  with 
beecomb,  6 and  9 June.  The  male  showed  some  gonadal  enlargement,  testes  4 
x 3 mm,  the  female  had  a small,  inactive  ovary.  The  female  was  in  much  worn 
and  faded  plumage;  the  male  was  not  in  fresh,  but  in  less  abraded,  feathering, 
and  was  darker  above;  weight  61.5  g in  the  male,  49.5  in  the  female;  stomach 
contents  of  male  "entirely  beeswax — weighed  3 g";  of  female  "insect  frag- 
ments"; soft  parts  were  recorded  as  follows:  bill  dark  horn  brown,  lower  base 
paler;  iris  orange-brown  (male)  to  dark  brown  (female);  feet  dark  brownish  gray 
to  blackish  gray;  bare  eye  skin  pinkish  brown  (male),  olive  gray  (female);  wing 
length  95.8  mm  (male),  94  mm  (female). 

Inasmuch  as  so  little  is  still  known  of  this  Honey-guide  it  may  be  well  to 
call  attention  to  a specimen  taken  more  than  12  years  ago,  in  a snare  baited  with 
beecomb,  in  the  Mongomo  region,  Rio  Muni  (now  Spanish  Continental 
Guinea),  a record  published  anonymously  (probably  by  J.  Sabater  Pi)  in  a 
little-consulted  popular  journal  of  the  Barcelona  Zoological  Park  (Anon. 
1963:43).  This  record  has  been  overlooked  by  all  the  ornithological  journals, 
and  is  the  first,  and  so  far,  the  only,  record  from  that  country.  The  specimen  is 


1978 


The  Lathrop  Ornithological 
Central  Alrican  Expedition 


13 


now  in  the  American  Museum  of  Natural  History  (AMNH  #802455).  While  this 
record  did  not  increase  the  known  range  oiMelichneutes,  which  was  previously 
reported  from  Gabon  to  the  south,  and  from  Cameroon  to  the  north,  the  almost 
simultaneous  report  by  Beatty  (1963:100-101)  suddenly  extended  its  range 
westward  by  about  1000  miles  to  Mt.  Nimba,  at  the  point  where  Liberia,  Ivory 
Coast  and  Guinea  come  together.  The  previous  westernmost  record  was  in 
southern  Nigeria,  but  it  is  probable  that  the  range  is  not  that  discontinuous;  the 
species  may  be  expected  to  “turn  up”  in  the  upper  Guinean  forests  of  the 
Ivory  Coast,  Ghana  and  Dahomey. 

Family  Picidae 

*Campethera  nivosa  herberti  (Alexander).  — The  Buff-spotted  Wood- 
pecker was  found  to  be  common  along  the  Ouossi  River  and  4 males  and  3 
females  were  collected  1 to  18  June,  all  with  little  or  no  gonadal  enlargement; 
weights  males  34  to  38  g (average  37);  females  34.5  to  38  g (average  36.1). 

Campethera  caroli  (Malherbe).  — One  male,  4 females,  all  with  sjnall 
gonads,  taken  6 to  17  June;  weights:  male  60  g;  females  53  to  68  g (average 
58.6).  These  specimens  agree  with  a long  series  from  western  Uganda  in  the 
Los  Angeles  collections,  and  would  have  to  be  considered  budongoensis  if  that 
race  were  upheld,  as  it  is  by  Mackworth-Praed  and  Grant  (1970:571),  but  the 
characters  of  that  subspecies  do  not  appear  to  be  constant  enough  to  warrant 
its  recognition. 

Dendropicos  xantholophus  Hargitt.  — This  woodpecker  apparently  is  less 
common  in  the  area  than  either  of  the  Campethera  species;  only  a single 
example  was  obtained  5 June,  a male  with  small  testes;  weight  58  g.  It  was  shot 
in  the  tree  tops,  whereas  the  Campethera  were  taken  largely  in  the  mist  nets, 
which  may  account  for  their  apparent  greater  numbers  and  relative  abundance. 

Family  Eurylaemidae 

*Smithornis  capensis  camarunensis  Sharpe.  — Three  specimens,  1 saved 
as  a study  skin  and  2 as  skeletons,  were  collected  in  mist  nets  in  the  forest 
undergrowth  2 to  13  June;  the  male  preserved  as  a study  skin  and  a female 
saved  as  a skeleton  had  enlarged  gonads;  a male  (skeleton)  showed  only  slight 
testicular  swelling;  weights  26  g in  each  male,  24  g in  the  female.  The  subspecific 
identification  of  the  study  skin  is  based  on  the  conclusions  of  Mackworth-Praed 
and  Grant  (1970:609),  but  it  agrees  very  well  with  a series  of  meinertzhageni 
from  western  Uganda,  which  Mackworth-Praed  and  Grant  consider  the  same  as 
medianus.  More  extensive  series  with  more  complete  geographic  coverage  are 
needed  to  settle  the  matter  of  races  of  this  bird. 


Family  Pittidae 

*Pitta  angolensis  longipennis  Reichenow.  — One  male,  testes  not  en- 
larged, was  taken  in  a mist  net  3 feet  up  in  dense  undergrowth  of  mature  forest, 


14 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  287 


5 June,  wing  121.5  mm,  weight  84  g.  The  fact  that  this  bird,  and  also  its  other 
African  congener,  P.  reichenowi,  are  captured  so  seldom,  even  in  mist  nets, 
suggests  that  they  are  really  scarce  and  not  merely  difficult  to  see. 

Family  Alaudidae 

Mirafra  rufocinnamomea  tigrina  Oustalet.  — The  Flappet  Lark  is  a bird 
of  the  open  grasslands,  not  of  the  forest;  2 males,  1 with  enlarged,  the  other 
with  small  testes,  were  taken  just  outside  the  forest  edge  6 and  16  June;  weights 
27  and  28  g.  This  race  of  the  Flappet  Lark  has  been  collected  but  seldom;  no 
records  from  the  Central  African  Republic  for  the  species  are  indicated  in  Hall 
and  Moreau  (1970:map  6).  Meyer  de  Schauensee  (1949:8)  listed  a specimen  of 
M.  r.  zombae  from  Oka,  which  may  be  referable  to  tigrina.  White  (1961:20) 
places  zombae  in  the  synonymy  of  fischeri,  but  it  seems  likely  that  the  name 
tigrina  could  be  applied  to  a specimen  from  the  Ubangi-Shari  region. 

Galerida  modesta  bucolica  (Hartlaub).  — The  Sun  Lark  was  found  in  the 
open  grasslands  at  the  edge  of  the  forest;  2 males  and  1 female,  all  with  small 
gonads,  were  taken  6 and  12  June;  weights  21.5  and  22  g in  the  males,  18  g in  the 
female;  stomach  contents,  insect  fragments  and  grass  seeds. 

Family  Pycnonotidae 

Pycnonotus  virens  virens  (Cassin).  — The  Little  Greenbul  was  common  in 
the  Ouossi  River  area;  5 specimens  were  netted  in  the  forest  undergrowth  31 
May  to  9 June,  3 males  with  enlarged  testes,  and  2 females,  one  with  enlarged, 
the  other  with  slightly  englarged  ovary;  weights  males  23.5,  24  and  24  g; 
females  21  g. 

Pycnonotus  curvirostris  curvirostris  (Cassin).  — Fairly  common;  3 males 
and  1 female  were  netted  in  the  riverine  forest  undergrowth  2 to  17  June; 
gonads  enlarged  in  the  3 males,  slightly  so  in  the  female;  weight  males  24,  25, 
26  g;  female  26  g.  Only  one  record  from  the  Central  African  Republic  is  indi- 
cated in  Hall  and  Moreau  (1970:map  68);  none  in  Malbrandt  and  Maclatchy 
(1949). 

Pycnonotus  latirostris  latirostris  (Strickland).  — Two  females,  1 with 
small,  1 with  enlarged  ovary,  were  netted  in  the  forest  undergrowth  31  May  and 
10  June;  weights  22  and  30  g.  Because  these  birds  are  fairly  small,  wing  length 
72  and  76  mm,  they  are  placed  with  the  nominate  race  of  this  Greenbul,  in 
accordance  with  Chapin’s  (1953:113)  arrangement,  although  they  are  not 
smaller  than  some  of  a long  series  of  eugenia  from  Uganda.  Chapin  admitted 
that  it  was  “difficult  to  determine  the  limits’’  between  the  two.  In  the  Central 
African  Republic  this  species  must  be  restricted  to  the  forested  areas  in  the 
south  along  its  border  with  the  Republic  of  the  Congo. 

"Pycnonotus  gracilirostris  chagwensis  (van  Someren).  — One  bird  of  each 
sex,  both  with  gonads  enlarged,  shot  in  a fruiting  tree  at  the  forest  edge  8 and  15 
June;  weight  32  g (male),  40  g (female).  The  map  in  Mackworth-Praed  and 
Grant  (1970:82)  seems  to  anticipate  its  presence  there,  but  as  stated  earlier,  this 
is  not  a definite  statement. 


1978 


The  Lathrop  Ornithological 
Central  African  Expedition 


15 


*Baeopogon  indicator  indicator  (van  Someren).  — One  male,  testes 
slightly  enlarged,  June  19;  weight  46  g. 

Phyllastrephus  scandens  orientalis  (Hartlaub).  — Six  specimens,  8 and  9 
June,  gonads  enlarged  in  1 male,  not  enlarged  in  2 others  and  in  3 females; 
mostly  netted  in  open  forest  undergrowth;  weights  males  48  and  50.5  g,  females 
38,  41,  45  g;  all  the  specimens  in  worn  plumage. 

Phyllastrephus  albigularis  albigularis  (Sharpe).  — Common;  6 specimens 
were  caught  in  mist  nets  in  the  forest  undergrowth  31  May  to  10  June;  3 with 
large,  3 with  small  gonads;  weight  males  26  and  28.5  g,  females  20  to  24  g 
(average  22.2).  These  birds  agree  in  size  and  coloration  with  a long  series  from 
western  Uganda.  Ouossi  River  provides  a specimen  record  locality  that  fills  a 
large  gap  in  Hall  and  Moreau’s  map  (1970:map  90). 

Bleda  syndactyla  woosnami  Ogilvie- Grant.  — Five  adults,  taken  in 
riverine  forest  undergrowth  31  May  to  7 June;  gonads  varying  from  small  to 
large;  weights  males  48,  49  g;  females  41,  48  g.  These  specimens  agree  with  a 
long  series  from  western  Uganda  and  do  not  show  any  intergradation  with  B. 
syndactyla  multicolor,  although  the  distribution  maps  in  Mackworth-Praed  and 
Grant  (1970:57-58)  suggest  that  the  latter  might  be  the  race  to  be  expected  in 
the  southern  part  of  the  Central  African  Republic.  Hall  and  Moreau  (1970:map 
80)  show  only  one  record  of  this  bird  in  the  Central  African  Republic,  where  its 
range  must  be  limited  to  the  southern  forests  near  the  border  of  the  Republic  of 
the  Congo. 

Bleda  eximia  ugandae  van  Someren.  — The  Green-tailed  Bristle-bill  is 
represented  by  5 adult  males,  testes  large  in  4,  slightly  enlarged  in  1 , and  1 adult 
female,  ovary  slightly  enlarged;  31  May  to  7 June;  weights  42  to  48  g in  males 
(average  44);  36  g in  the  female. 

Nicator  chloris  (Valenciennes).  — Although  many  recent  authors  place 
Nicator  in  the  shrike  family,  I prefer  to  follow  Chapin’s  arguments  (1953:183- 
185)  and  keep  it  among  the  bulbuls,  somewhat  aberrant  as  it  may  be  in  that 
family.  It  must  be  common  in  the  Ouossi  River  forests,  where  7 adults  were 
obtained,  largely  in  mist  nets  in  the  undergrowth  in  both  open  and  dense  forest, 
2 to  19  June;  3 males  with  enlarged  testes,  4 females  with  small  or  slightly 
enlarged  ovaries;  weight  males  50,  54,  58  g;  females  40,  41,  43,  43g. 

Criniger  calurus  emini  Chapin.  — Fairly  common;  5 specimens,  3 males 
and  2 females  were  taken  in  mist  nets  in  the  riverine  forest  undergrowth,  3 to  16 
June;  gonads  not  enlarged  in  3,  enlarged  in  2 of  the  birds;  weights  males  30.5  to 
34  g (average  32.1);  females  25  and  30  g. 


Family  Laniidae 

Malaconotus  cruentus  adolfifriederici  Reichenow.  — One  male,  testes 
slightly  enlarged,  was  taken  in  dense  forest  undergrowth  31  May;  weight  79.5 
g.  The  races  of  this  shrike  are  ill-defined  and  not  too  certainly  identifiable. 
However,  the  small  size  of  the  present  specimen,  wing  107  mm,  agrees  with 
one  from  the  Semliki  River  (Chapin  1954:40),  and  it  is  placed  with  adolfi- 
friederici. Hall  and  Moreau  (1970:map  112)  show  no  records  for  M.  cruentus 


16 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  287 


from  the  Central  African  Republic  east  of  Bangui,  and  Mackworth-Praed  and 
Grant  (1973:460)  seem  to  restrict  adolfifriederici  to  the  eastern  parts  of  Zaire 
and  western  Uganda,  so  the  present  specimen  extends  the  known  range  of  that 
race  a long  distance  to  the  northwest. 

Family  Muscicapidae 
Subfamily  Turdinae 

*Erythropygia  leucosticta  collsi  Alexander.  — Three  adult  males,  1 breed- 
ing, 1 with  enlarged  and  1 with  small  testes;  1 female  with  an  enlarged  ovary, 
were  taken  in  mist  nets  in  heavy  forest  undergrowth  6 to  12  June;  weights  males 
26,  27,  28  g,  female  27  g;  stomach  contents  beetles  and  a small  snail. 

Erithacus  erythrothorax  mabirae  Jackson.  — A common  bird  in  the 
Ouossi  River  forest,  but  one  that  is  seldom  seen  except  when  caught  in  mist 
nets;  5 males  and  2 females  were  so  captured  in  dense  forest  undergrowth  31 
May  to  4 June,  gonads  large  in  1 male,  small  or  only  slightly  enlarged  in  the 
others;  weights  males  16.5  to  19  g (average  17.5),  females  16.5,  17  g.  Judging 
from  the  absence  of  records  in  Hall  and  Moreau  (1970: map  145)  the  above  are 
the  first  specimens  collected  in  the  Central  African  Republic  other  than  in  the 
extreme  southwest,  near  the  Cameroon  border. 

*Cossypha  natalensis  intensa  Mearns.  — Two  males,  1 female,  all  with 
gonads  much  enlarged,  taken  in  forest  undergrowth  8 to  10  June;  weights  males 
37,  39  g,  female  38  g.  These  extend  the  known  range  of  this  Robin-chat 
northward  to  the  southern  part  of  the  Central  African  Republic. 

*Alethe  diademata  woosnami  Grant.  — The  Fire-crest  Alethe  was  found 
to  be  common  in  the  Ouossi  River  forests  and  its  range  in  the  Central  African 
Republic  is  probably  restricted  to  the  forests  near  the  Zaire  border.  Between  31 
May  and  9 June  8 specimens  were  taken,  4 males  with  large  testes,  1 female 
with  an  oviduct  egg,  2 with  slight  ovarian  enlargement,  and  1 subadult  female 
molting  into  adult  plumage;  weights  males  32  to  34  g (average  32.6),  female 
adults  32  to  39  g (average  34.7),  subadult  female  28  g. 

*Alethe  poliocephala  carruthersi  Grant.  — Four  adult  Brown-chested 
Alethes,  two  of  each  sex,  the  males  with  large  testes,  the  females  varying  from 
small  to  slightly  enlarged  ovaries,  were  netted  in  the  dense  forest  undergrowth 
31  May  to  15  June;  weights  males  30,  32.5  g;  females  26,  31  g respectively. 

Stizorhina  fraseri  vulpina  Reichenow.  — Fairly  common  in  the  Ouossi 
River  forests,  1 male  and  4 females  were  taken  there  1 to  11  June;  gonads 
enlarged  in  most  of  the  birds,  one  female  marked  “breeding”;  weight  of  male 
34  g,  females  32,  33.5,  36  and  39.5  g;  all  had  been  feeding  on  small  beetles. 

Neocossyphus  poensis  praepectoralis  Jackson.  — Two  males,  1 female, 
with  gonads  enlarged  in  1,  not  in  the  others,  were  taken  in  riverine  forest 
undergrowth  31  May  to  10  June,  and  extend  the  known  range  of  this  bird  a 
considerable  distance  north.  In  the  Central  African  Republic  the  species  was 
reported  earlier  only  from  the  extreme  southwest  corner,  close  to  the  Came- 
roon border.  The  males  weighed  52  and  53  g,  the  female  50.5  g. 


1978 


The  Lathrop  Ornithological 
Central  African  Expedition 


17 


Subfamily  Timaliinae 

*Trichastoma  albipectus  albipectus  (Reichenow).  — Common  in  the 
forest  undergrowth;  4 males  and  3 females  were  taken  1 to  19  June,  gonads 
varying  from  small  to  large;  weights  males  31  to  38  g (average  35.2),  females  30 
to  36  g (average  32.3);  stomach  contents  beetles  and  one  lepidopteran  larva. 
These  specimens  extend  the  known  range  of  the  species  to  the  northwest  of  the 
records  plotted  by  Hall  and  Moreau  (1970:map  165). 

*Trichastoma  rufipenne  rufipenne  Sharpe.  — Apparently  less  numerous 
than  T.  fulvescens;  3 males,  all  with  enlarged  testes,  taken  2 to  5 June,  weights 
26  to  30  g (average  28),  agree  with  a long  series  from  western  Uganda. 

Trichastoma  fulvescens  ugandae  (van  Someren).  — A common  species  in 
the  forest,  4 adults  of  each  sex  were  collected  1 to  17  June;  gonads  varying  from 
not  enlarged  to  large;  weights  31  to  38  g (average  34.7)  in  males;  28  to  30.5  g 
(average  29)  in  females. 

*Ptyrticus  turdinus  turdinus  Hartlaub.  - — Two  examples  of  the  Thrush- 
babbler  were  taken  in  the  dense  undergrowth  of  the  forest  1 1 and  12  June,  one 
of  each  sex,  both  with  small  gonads;  weight  male  72.5  g,  female  59  g.  The  male 
is  considerably  larger  than  the  female,  wing  107.4  as  against  95.4  mm;  culmen 
from  base  22.9  as  against  22.1  mm;  the  tail  of  the  female  too  damaged  for 
meaningful  comparison.  The  present  specimens  help  to  fill  a great  geographic 
gap  in  the  range,  as  indicated  by  actual  specimen  records,  in  Hall  and  Moreau 
(1970:map  168). 

Phyllanthus  atripennis  bohndorffi  (Sharpe).  — The  Capuchin  Babbler  is  a 
common  bird  in  the  forests  of  the  Ouossi  River  area.  Six  adults,  3 of  each  sex 
were  taken  between  5 and  16  June  (4  netted,  2 shot);  all  with  small  or  only 
slightly  enlarged  gonads;  weights  males  80,  84,  90  g;  females  86,  86  and  94  g 
respectively.  These  specimens  are  all  typical  bohndorffi  and  show  no  approach 
to  haynesi  of  northern  Cameroon  although  1 male  has  two  dark  brown  feathers 
among  the  gray  ones  on  one  side  of  the  crown;  they  agree  closely  with  a series 
from  western  Uganda.  The  Ouossi  region  adds  an  intermediate  locality  of 
record  in  the  distribution  shown  for  the  species  in  Hall  and  Moreau  (1970:map 
175). 


Subfamily  Sylviinae 

Cisticola  natalensis  strangei  (Fraser).  — Two  males,  testes  slightly  en- 
larged, were  taken  at  the  forest  edge  15  and  20  June;  weights  23  and  26  g. 

Camaroptera  brevicaudata  tincta  (Cassin).  — Three  males,  all  with  large 
gonads,  were  netted  in  the  forest  undergrowth  4 to  12  June;  weights  1 1,  12  and 
12  g. 

* Camaroptera  superciliaris  flavigularis  Reichenow.  — One  male,  testes 
large,  was  taken  in  dense  growth  at  the  forest  edge  4 June;  weight  10  g. 

* Camaroptera  chloronota  toroensis  (Jackson).  — Three  males,  testes 
slightly  or  not  enlarged,  netted  in  forest  undergrowth  1 and  2 June,  weights 
10.5,  1 1 and  12  g,  constitute  a very  considerable  northwestern  extension  of  the 


18 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  287 


known  range  of  the  species.  They  agree  well  with  west  Ugandan  examples  and 
are,  accordingly,  placed  with  that  race. 

*Macrosphenus  flavicans  hypochondriacus  (Reichenow).  — One  male 
with  small  testes,  netted  in  forest  undergrowth  10  June,  weight  14  g,  extends 
the  previously  known  range  of  the  race  hypochondriacus  northwestward  about 
200  miles. 

Hyliota  flavigaster  flavigaster  Swainson.  — Two  adults,  one  of  each  sex, 
male  with  enlarged  testes,  female  with  small  ovary,  were  collected  at  the  edge 
of  the  forest  12  and  13  June,  foraging  in  the  tree  tops  with  a party  of  Parus 
leucomelas;  weight  male  13  g,  female  12.5  g.  Judging  by  the  distribution  shown 
in  Hall  and  Moreau  (1970: map  259)  these  specimens  fill  a considerable  gap  in 
the  recorded  range  of  the  species. 

Hylia  prasina  prasina  (Cassin).  — Apparently  common  in  the  Ouossi 
River  area,  6 specimens,  3 of  each  sex,  gonads  varying  from  small  to  large, 
were  netted  in  the  forest  undergrowth  1 to  10  June;  weights  males  14,  15,  15  g, 
females  12  g in  each  case. 

Subfamily  Muscicapinae 

Fraseria  cinerascens  cinerascens  Hartlaub.  — This  Flycatcher  must  be 
common  in  the  Ouossi  River  forests,  as  4 adults  of  each  sex  and  1 immature 
male  were  taken,  chiefly  in  mist  nets  in  the  forest  undergrowth,  31  May  to  18 
June;  gonads  small  in  most  birds,  large  in  1 male  taken  31  May;  weights  males 
21.5  to  24.5  g (average  23),  females  18  to  22  g (average  19.8). 

Myioparus  plumbeus  plumbeus  (Hartlaub).  — A single  male,  testes  not 
enlarged,  one  of  a small  flock  seen  at  the  edge  of  the  forest,  was  collected  18 
June.  It  is  not  fully  adult,  with  a brownish  wash  on  the  breast  and  sides  of  the 
abdomen;  weight  13  g.  Hall  and  Moreau  (1970:map  249)  show  no  records  for 
this  Flycatcher  from  the  southern  part  of  the  Central  African  Republic. 

Myioparus  griseigularis  griseigularis  (Jackson).  — Three  males,  2 with 
enlarged  testes,  1 with  small  ones,  2 to  12  June;  weights  14  g in  each  case; 
plumage  somewhat  abraded  in  all.  These  specimens  agree  closely  with  a series 
from  western  Uganda.  The  Ouossi  River  records  add  a locality  in  the  middle  of 
a considerable  gap  in  the  map  in  Hall  and  Moreau  (1970:map  249). 

*Platysteira  castanea  castanea  (Fraser).  — Two  males  and  1 female,  all 
with  enlarged  gonads,  were  netted  in  dense  forest  undergrowth  4 and  9 June; 
weights  males  13  and  14  g,  female  16  g. 

*Trochocercus  nigromitratus  (Reichenow).  — One  female,  with  ovary  not 
enlarged,  was  taken  in  open  undergrowth  in  riverine  forest  6 June;  weight  9 g. 
The  distribution  of  this  species  in  the  Central  African  Republic  must  be  limited 
to  the  forested  areas  of  the  south,  along  the  border  of  the  Republic  of  the 
Congo. 

Terpsiphone  rufiventer  ignea  (Reichenow).  — Apparently  common  in  the 
Ouossi  River  area,  but  previously  reported  only  from  the  western  part  of  the 
Central  African  Republic;  4 males,  all  with  large  testes,  2 females,  with  little  or 


1978 


The  Lathrop  Ornithological 
Central  African  Expedition 


19 


no  ovarian  swelling,  7 to  18  June;  weights  males  14  to  15.5  g (average  14.9), 
females  15.5,  16  g.  These  specimens  extend  the  known  range  of  ignea  north- 
westward a considerable  distance,  the  previously  reported  limit  being  the  Uelle 
River,  Zaire.  Like  the  Congo  specimens  of  ignea,  these  birds  have  the  rec- 
trices  brownish,  only  washed  with  rufous. 

Family  Paridae 

Parus  leucomelas  guineensis  Shelley.  — One  male,  testes  not  enlarged,  was 
taken  at  the  edge  of  the  forest  8 June;  weight  20  g;  also  seen  12  and  13  June. 


Family  Nectariniidae 

Anthreptes  longuemarei  haussarum  Neumann.  — One  male,  1 female, 
gonads  not  enlarged,  were  taken  at  the  edge  of  the  forest  7 and  13  June;  weight 
male  14  g,  female  not  recorded. 

* Anthreptes  rectirostris  tephrolaema  (Jardine  and  Fraser).  — Five  males, 
gonads  varying  from  small  to  large,  were  taken  in  trees  at  the  forest  edge,  12  to 
16  June;  weights  10  g in  4 cases,  11  g in  the  other. 

Anthreptes  collaris  somereni  Chapin.  — One  male,  testes  enlarged,  3 
females,  ovaries  small,  were  collected  in  fruiting  trees  at  the  forest  edge  5 to  17 
June;  weight  of  male  10  g,  females  8 g each. 

^Nectarinia  seimundi  traylori  Wolters.  — One  specimen,  sex  undeter- 
mined, was  taken  in  a fruiting  tree  at  the  forest  edge  15  June. 

Nectarinia  olivacea  cephaelis  (Bates).  — This  Sunbird  must  be  common 
in  the  Ouossi  River  area;  8 specimens,  3 males  with  large  testes,  5 females  with 
small  to  slightly  enlarged  ovaries,  were  taken  in  the  riverine  forest  31  May  to  8 
June;  weights  males  11,  11.5  and  12  g,  females  9 g in  1,  10  g in  the  other  4 
individuals. 

* Nectarinia  cyanolaema  octaviae  Amadon.  — Two  males  with  large 
testes  were  shot  in  fruiting  trees  at  the  forest  edge  18  and  20  June;  weights  15, 

16  g. 

Nectarinia  superba  superba  (Shaw).  — One  male,  testes  large,  was  col- 
lected in  tree  tops  at  the  forest  edge  17  June;  weight  17.5  g. 

Family  Emberizidae 

Emberiza  cabanisi  cabanisi  (Reichenow).  — One  female,  ovary  not  en- 
larged, was  taken  at  the  forest  edge  31  May;  weight  22  g. 

Family  Estrildidae 

Parmoptila  woodhousei  woodhousei  Cassin.  — One  male,  testes  slightly 
enlarged,  was  netted  in  swampy  undergrowth  of  the  forest  10  June;  weight  9.5 
g,  and  extends  the  known  range  of  this  subspecies  eastward  about  500  miles 
along  the  northern  limits  of  its  range.  In  the  Central  African  Republic  it  was 


20 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  287 


known  earlier  only  from  the  extreme  western  area,  bordering  on  Cameroon. 

*Nigrita  bicolor  brunnescens  Reichenow.  — Two  females,  1 with  small 
and  1 with  enlarged  ovary,  were  taken  near  the  forest  edge  10  and  12  June; 
weights  13  and  15  g. 

*Nigrita  canicapilla  canicapilla  (Strickland).  — Two  females,  1 with  en- 
larged, 1 with  small  ovary,  were  collected  15  and  19  June  at  the  forest  edge; 
weight  20  g each.  The  present  birds  are  very  slightly  paler  gray  above  than  a 
series  of  schistacea  from  western  Uganda,  but  the  two  races  must  meet  not  far 
to  the  east  of  the  Ouossi  River  area.  The  birds  had  been  eating  small  fruits, 
probably  of  the  trees  from  which  they  were  collected. 

Euschistospiza  dybowskii  (Oustalet).  — One  female  with  small  ovary,  and  1 
bird  of  undetermined  sex  (male  by  plumage),  were  collected  in  dense  thicket  at 
the  forest  edge  8 and  20  June;  weight  of  male  (?)  13  g,  female  12  g;  stomach 
contents  grass  seeds  and  insects.  These  specimens  fill  a considerable  blank  in 
the  records  shown  by  Hall  and  Moreau  (1970: map  385). 

*Mandingoa  nitidula  schlegeli  (Sharpe).  — One  male,  testes  not  enlarged, 
was  netted  in  forest  undergrowth  12  June;  weight  11  g. 

Pyrenestes  ostrinus  ostrinus  (Vieillot).  — The  Black-billed  Seed-cracker 
must  be  common  in  the  Ouossi  River  area  as  6 examples,  all  with  small  gonads, 
were  taken  in  mist  nets  in  the  swampy  forest  undergrowth  2 to  19  June;  weights 
males  21,  21.5  22  g,  females  21,  23,  23  g.  Mackworth-Praed  and  Grant 
(1973:695-696)  treat  ostrinus  and  rothschildi  as  two  sympatric  species  on  the 
assumption  that  “it  seems  very  doubtful  that  large-billed  and  small-billed  birds 
would  interbreed  in  any  one  locality  ...”  On  the  other  side  of  the  argument, 
Chapin  (1954:493)  writes  “that  birds  of  differing  sizes  may  mate  with  each 
other  cannot  be  doubted”  and  gives  specific  instances.  It  may  be  that  before 
man  began  to  clear  and  otherwise  intrude  into  previously  uniformly  forested 
areas  there  may  have  been  separation  of  the  two  “species”  but  the  fact  that 
they  do  cross  and  that  variants  of  all  degrees  of  intermediate  size  occur  to- 
gether in  many  areas  indicates  that  the  birds  do  not  “recognize”  specific  dif- 
ferences. And  they  are,  biologically,  the  reliable  judges.  The  present  6 birds 
show  both  ostrinus  and  rothschildi  characters  in  bill  size.  A similar  situation 
prevails  in  a long  series  of  specimens  from  western  Uganda. 

*Spermophaga  ruficapilla  ruficapilla  (Shelley).  — The  Red-headed  Blue- 
bill  must  be  very  abundant  in  the  Ouossi  River  area  as  14  specimens,  8 males, 
all  with  small  or  only  slightly  enlarged  testes,  and  6 females,  all  with  small 
ovaries,  were  taken,  largely  in  mist  nets,  in  the  dense  forest  undergrowth  2 to 
12  June;  weights  22  to  27  g (average  24.3)  in  males,  24  to  28  g (average  24.8)  in 
females.  The  present  records  extend  the  known  range  of  the  species  over  a 
hundred  miles  to  the  northwest. 

Family  Ploceidae 

Ploceus  nigricollis  nigricollis  (Vieillot).  — One  female,  ovary  slightly  en- 
larged, was  collected  in  a fruiting  tree  at  the  forest  edge  18  June;  weight  31  g. 


1978 


The  Lathrop  Ornithological 
Central  African  Expedition 


21 


Ploceus  cucullatus  bohndorffi  Reichenow.  — Two  males,  testes  enlarged, 
were  taken  at  the  forest  edge  8 and  12  June;  weights  41,  47  g. 

*Malimbus  nitens  microrhynchus  Reichenow.  — Two  females,  ovaries 
not  or  only  slightly  enlarged,  were  netted  in  riverine  forest  undergrowth  4 and 
15  June;  weights  30,  34  g.  These  birds  are  small,  wings  80  and  82.5  mm,  and 
agree  with  a series  from  western  Uganda.  They  extend  the  known  range  of 
microrhynchus  about  300  miles  to  the  northwest. 

Malimbus  malimbicus  crassirostris  Hartert.  — Three  specimens,  all  in 
non-breeding  state,  were  taken  8 to  19  June;  weight  male  36  g,  females  31  and 
33  g.  These  birds  are  close  to  crassirostris  from  western  Uganda  and  fill  a 
sizeable  gap  in  the  data  recorded  in  Hall  and  Moreau  (1970: map  348). 

Family  Dicruridae 

Dicrurus  ludwigii  sharpei  Oustalet.  — The  Square-tailed  Drongo  must  be 
fairly  common  in  the  Ouossi  River  forests,  as  5 specimens  were  taken,  3 males 
with  enlarged  or  slightly  enlarged  testes,  2 females  with  small  ovaries,  3 to  11 
June;  weights  males  31,  31,  32  g,  females  26,  30  g. 

*Dicrurus  atripennis  Swainson.  — One  female,  ovary  slightly  enlarged, 
was  netted  in  open  forest  undergrowth  14  June;  weight  42  g;  stomach  contents 
mainly  beetles. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The  Lathrop  Central  African  Republic  Expedition  of  1976  was  made  pos- 
sible by  the  generosity  and  interest  of  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Charles  F.  Lathrop  of 
Ellensburg,  Washington.  Not  only  are  our  thanks  due  to  the  Lathrops  for  their 
generous  sponsorship,  but  also  to  Andrew  Williams  and  his  African  assistants 
for  their  excellent  work  in  obtaining  the  present  collection  and  the  new  knowl- 
edge its  study  has  revealed,  and  to  Mrs.  Reese  Hale  Taylor  who  kindly  typed  the 
manuscript. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Anonymous  (probably  J.  SABATER  PI).  1963.  El  misteriosa  “pajaro  indicador  de  cola 
de  lira.”  Zoo:  Revista  de  Parque  Zoologico  de  Barcelona,  no.  2:43. 

Archer,  A.L.  and  R.M.  Glen.  1969.  Observations  on  the  behavior  of  two  species  of 
honey-guides,  Indicator  variegatus  (Lesson)  and  Indicator  exilis  (Cassin).  Los 
Angeles  County  Museum  Contr.  Sci.  no.  160:1-6. 

Beatty,  H.A.  1963.  The  lyre-tailed  honey-guide  in  the  Ivory  Coast.  Bull.  British  Or- 
nithologists’ Club,  83:100-101. 

Chapin,  J.P.  1932.  The  birds  of  the  Belgian  Congo.  Pt.  I.  American  Museum  Nat.  Hist. 
Bull.  65:1-756. 

1939.  The  birds  of  the  Belgian  Congo.  Pt.  II.  American  Museum  Nat.  Hist. 

Bull.  75:1-632. 


22 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  287 


. 1953.  The  birds  of  the  Belgian  Congo.  Pt.  III.  American  Museum  Nat.  Hist. 

Bull.  75A:1-821. 

. 1954.  The  birds  of  the  Belgian  Congo.  Pt.  IV.  American  Museum  Nat.  Hist. 

Bull.  75B:  1-846. 

. 1962.  Sibling  species  of  small  African  honey-guides.  Ibis,  104:40-44. 

Clancey,  P.A.  1970.  Miscellaneous  taxonomic  notes  on  African  birds.  XXIX.  Durban 
Museum  Novitates  8,  pt.  20:375-390. 

. 1972.  A catalogue  of  birds  of  the  South  African  Sub-Region.  Supplement  no. 

2.  Durban  Museum  Novitates  9,  pt.  12:163-200. 

Friedmann,  H.  1955.  The  Honey-guides.  United  States  National  Museum  Bull.  208:1- 
292. 

. 1968.  Zenker’s  Honey-guide.  Journal  fur  Ornithologie,  109:276-283. 

. 1969.  The  status  and  distribution  in  Uganda  of  the  white-bellied  kingfisher, 

Alcedo  leucogaster  leopoldi.  Los  Angeles  County  Mus.  Contr.  Sci.  no.  158:1-6. 
. 1970.  Phenotypic  potential  and  speciation  in  Indicator  and  Prodotiscus.  Os- 
trich, Supplement,  8:21-26. 

Friedmann,  H.  and  J.G.  Williams.  1968.  Notable  records  of  rare  or  little-known  birds 
from  western  Uganda.  Revue  Zoologique  et  Botanique  Africain,  77,  nos.  1-2:1 1-36. 

. 1971.  The  birds  of  the  lowlands  of  Bwamba,  Toro  Province,  Uganda.  Los 

Angeles  County  Mus.  Contr.  Sci.  no.  211:1-70. 

Hall,  B.P.  and  R.E.  Moreau.  1970.  An  atlas  of  speciation  in  African  passerine  birds. 
British  Museum  (Nat.  Hist.):  xv+ 1-423. 

Irwin,  M.P.S.  and  C.W.  Benson.  1966.  Notes  on  the  birds  of  Zambia.  Pt.  II.  Arnoldia, 

2,  no.  37:1-21. 

Keith,  S.,  A.  Twomey,  H.  Friedmann,  and  J.G.  Williams.  1969.  The  avifauna  of  the 
Impenetrable  Forest,  Uganda.  American  Museum  Novitates  no.  2389:1-41. 
Mackworth-Praed,  C.W.  and  C.H.B.  Grant.  1970-1973.  Birds  of  west-central  and 
western  Africa.  2 vols.  1-670;  1-818. 

Malbrandt,  R.  1952.  Faune  du  Centre  Africain  Francais  (mammiferes  et  oiseaux).  ed. 

2.  in  Encyclopedic  biologique.  Paris,  15:1-616. 

Malbrandt,  R.  and  A.R.  Maclatchy.  1949.  Faune  L’Equateur  Africain  Francais,  1. 

Oiseaux.  in  Encyclopedic  biologique,  Paris  35:1-460. 

Meyer  de  Schauensee,  R.  1949.  Results  of  the  Carpenter  African  Expedition  1947-1948. 

Notulae  Naturae,  Academy  Natural  Sci.  Philadelphia,  no.  219:1-16. 

Morony,  John  J.  Jr.,  W.J.  Bock,  and  J.  Farrand,  Jr.  1975.  Reference  List  of  the  Birds  of 
the  World.  American  Museum  Nat.  Hist.  1-207. 

Prigogine,  A.  1971.  Les  oiseaux  de  L’ltombwe  et  son  hinterland.  Musee  Royal  de 
l’Afrique  Centrale,-Tervuren,  Annals,  ser.  in  8°  Ser.  Zool.,  no.  185:1-298. 
Schouteden,  H.  1962.  La  faune  ornithologique  des  districts  de  la  Mongala  et  de 
l’Ubangi.  Musee  Royal  de  l’Afrique  Centrale,-Tervuren.  Documentation 
Zoologique  no.  3:1-144. 

. 1963.  La  faune  ornithologique  des  district  de  1’Ituri.  Musee  Royal  de  V Afrique 

Centrale,-Tervuren.  Documentation  Zoologique  no.  5:1-144. 

White,  C.M.N.  1965.  A revised  check-list  of  African  non-passerine  birds.  Lusaka,  Govt. 
Printer:  1-299. 

Williams,  J.G.  and  H.  Friedmann.  1965.  The  pygmy  honey-guide.  Indicator  pumilio 
Chapin,  in  East  Africa.  Bull.  British  Ornithologists’  Club,  85:21-22. 

Zimmerman,  D.  A.  1972.  The  avifauna  of  the  Kakamega  Forest,  western  Kenya,  includ- 
ing a bird  population  study.  American  Museum  Nat.  Hist.  Bull.  149,  art.  3:259-339,. 

Accepted  for  publication  January  19,  1977. 


501, 73 


NUMBER  288 
MARCH  17,  1978 


FOLIICOLOUS  ASCOMYCETES  1: 
THE  CAPNODIACEOUS  GENUS  SCORIAS, 

REPRODUCTION 


By  Don  R.  Reynolds 


NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCENCC 


Published  by  the  NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM 
OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007 


SERIAL  PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE 
NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 


Prior  to  November  30,  1973,  publications  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  have  appeared 
under  various  formats — Leaflet  Series,  Museum  Graphic,  Science  Series,  Study  Guides,  Con- 
tributions in  Science,  Contributions  in  History,  Science  Bulletins,  unnumbered  catalogs  of 
exhibitions,  and  other  miscellaneous  publications.  The  Museum  now  publishes  the  following 
serials  at  irregular  intervals  as  CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE,  HISTORY  BULLETINS, 
SCIENCE  BULLETINS,  EDUCATION  SERIES,  HISTORY  SERIES,  and  SCIENCE  SE- 
RIES. The  Contributions  are  short  papers  of  octavo  size.  The  Bulletins  are  longer,  compre- 
hensive papers  of  quarto  size.  The  Series  are  papers  of  variable  lengths  of  quarto  or  larger 
size.  Papers  in  each  serial  are  numbered  separately  and  consecutively. 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  contain  articles  in  the  earth  and  life  sciences,  presenting 
results  of  original  research.  Emphasis  is  intended  principally  for  papers  allied  to  biosystematic 
research,  but  other  subjects  and  review-oriented  ones  will  be  considered.  Number  1 was  issued 
on  January  23,  1957.  Contributions  must  be  not  less  than  8 nor  exceed  72  printed  pages. 


INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  AUTHORS 

Acceptance  of  manuscripts  will  be  determined  by  the  significance  of  new  information.  Priority 
will  be  given  to  manuscripts  by  staff  members.  All  manuscripts  must  be  recommended  by  the 
curator  in  charge  of  each  discipline  or  by  the  Editorial  Board.  Manuscripts  must  conform  to 
the  specifications  listed  below.  They  will  be  examined  for  suitability  by  the  Editorial  Board 
and  will  include  review  by  specialists  outside  the  Museum. 

Authors  must  adhere  to  the  International  Code  of  Nomenclature  of  Bacteria  and  Viruses, 
International  Code  of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  and  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature, including  their  respective  recommendations.  Further,  authors  proposing  new  taxa  in 
a CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  must  indicate  that  all  primary  types  have  been  deposited 
in  an  appropriate  scientific  institution  of  their  choice  and  must  cite  that  institution  by  name. 

MANUSCRIPT  FORM. — (1)  In  preparation  of  copy  follow  the  1972  CBE  Style  Manual, 
third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapters  5 and  6.  (2)  Footnotes  should  be  avoided;  acknowledgments 
as  footnotes  will  not  be  accepted.  (3)  An  informative  abstract  must  be  included  for  all  papers. 
(4)  A Spanish  summary  is  required  for  all  manuscripts  dealing  with  Latin  American  subjects. 
Summaries  in  other  languages  are  not  required  but  are  strongly  recommended.  (5)  A differ- 
ential diagnosis  must  accompany  any  newly  proposed  taxon.  (6)  Submit  two  copies  of  manu- 
script. 

ILLUSTRATIONS. — All  illustrations,  including  maps  and  photographs,  will  be  referred  to 
as  figures.  All  illustrations  should  be  of  sufficient  clarity  and  in  proper  proportions  for  reduc- 
tion to  CONTRIBUTIONS  page  size.  In  preparing  illustrations  and  legends  consult  the  1972 
CBE  Style  Manual,  third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapter  5.  Submit  only  illustrations  made  with 
permanent  ink  and  glossy  photographic  prints  of  good  contrast.  Submit  duplicate  copies  of 
all  illustrations.  Original  illustrations  will  be  returned  after  the  manuscript  has  been  published. 

PROOF. — Authors  will  be  sent  galley  proofs  which  should  be  corrected  and  returned  promptly. 
No  changes  or  alterations,  other  than  typesetting  corrections,  will  be  allowed  unless  paid  by 
author.  Requests  for  reprints  may  be  placed  through  the  Editor. 

R.  Edward  Ostermeyer 
Editor 


All  communications  concerning  manuscripts  and  exchange  of  or  purchase  of  publications 
should  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Museum  Publications,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 

Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America  by  Chapman’s  Phototypesetting  on  70#  Patina  Book 


FOLIICOLOUS  ASCOMYCETES  1: 

THE  CAPNODIACEOUS  GENUS  SCORIAS 
REPRODUCTION1 

By  Don  R.  Reynolds2 


Abstract:  Scorias  spongiosa  (Schw.)  Fries  development  is  analyzed  by 
use  of  sequential  collections  from  Georgia.  The  soma  develops  during  the  fall  to 
winter  season.  The  morphology  of  the  anamorphic  centrum  remains  unchanged 
as  the  soma  matures.  The  teliomorphic  centrum  is  dothideaceous;  a sterile 
element  in  this  centrum  is  interpreted  as  laterally  positioned  periphyses;  the 
ascus  is  functionally  bitunicate.  A protocol  to  substantiate  definite  proof  of 
reproductive  state  pleomorphism  is  discussed. 


INTRODUCTION 

Scorias  Fries,  a classic  North  American  representative  of  sooty  mold  As- 
comycete  fungi,  is  known  in  the  earliest  American  mycological  literature.  This 
capnodiaceous  genus  is  based  on  an  early  known  North  American  species,  S. 
spongiosa  (Schw.)  Fries.  This  fungus  occurs  in  a typical  sooty  mold  plant- 
surface  habitat  in  saprobic  association  with  insect  exudate.  Although  the 
distribution  of  the  fungus  is  known  to  be  along  the  U.S.  east  coast  from  northern 
Florida  to  Maine,  S.  spongiosa  has  received  little  attention  since  its  initial 
impact  on  mycological  literature  of  the  19th  century. 

The  labyrinthic  stroma  formed  by  the  dark  mycelial  growth,  preceding 
pseudothecium  formation,  was  first  termed  “sponge.”  Initially  Schweinitz 
( 1 822)  and  later  Fries  ( 1 829)  in  the  type  description  of  the  genus,  commented  on 
the  waxlike  appearance  of  the  mycelium  and  the  change  in  the  “sponge” 
matrix  from  brittle  to  soft  upon  absorption  of  moisture.  The  nam e Scorias  was 
utilized  by  Fries  to  denote  the  stromatal  resemblance  to  slag  as  the  structure 
developed  on  leaves  and  branches  of  the  American  beech,  Fagus  grandifolia 
L.  S.  spongiosa  was  illustrated  by  Ellis  and  Everhart  (1892)  with  a drawing 
showing  ascocarps  and  pycnidia  (as  “spermogonia”)  originating  from  the  same 


Review  Committee  for  this  Contribution 
Christopher  Davidson 
M.L.  Farr 
James  Kimbrough 

2Senior  Curator  of  Botany,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County,  900 
Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California,  90007.  USA 


2 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  288 


“fertile  branch.”  They  placed  the  monotypic  genus  in  a taxon,  the  Peris- 
poriaceae,  defined  with  “ostiolum  obscure  or  wanting  . . . opening  irregu- 
larly.” Von  Hoehnel  (1910)  described  the  hyphae  as  copious,  partially  slimy 
and  fused  together  bundlelike.  He  characterized  (1909)  the  pseudothecium 
centrum  as  cartilaginous-gelatinous  due  to  the  nature  of  the  component  sterile 
elements.  Ascus  dispersal  was  attributed  to  an  apical  swelling  of  the  centrum. 
“Ein  ausgesprochenes  Ostiolum  fehlt  stets.”  Few  other  morphological  insights 
can  be  gleamed  from  subsequent  literature  (i.e.,  Lloyd  1921;  Batista  & Ciferri 
1963b). 

This  paper  concerns  the  developmental  morphology  of  Scorias  spongiosa. 
A taxonomic  monograph  of  the  genus  Scorias  Fries  is  to  appear  later  as  an 
additional  contribution  from  ongoing  studies  focusing  on  foliicolous  fungi. 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS: 

The  sequential  collections  selected  for  detailed  analysis  represent  periodic 
sampling  from  Athens,  Georgia  — i.e.  LAM  200001  (25  X 1971),  LAM  200004 
(12  XI  1971),  LAM  200006  (02  XII  1971),  LAM  200007  (20  XII  1971).  Collec- 
tion LAM  200008  (21  I 1972)  was  utilized  for  illustration  of  mature  material; 
information  from  collection  LAM  200000  (18  VIII  1973)  was  incorporated  for 
data  on  early  development.  Additional  specimens  examined  from  Georgia  in- 
cluded LAM  200002  (02  II  1972),  LAM  200004  (09  II  1972),  LAM  200005  (20  II 
1972),  LAM  200009  (05  IV  1972),  LAM  200010  (24  IV  1970),  LAM  200011  (11 
V 1972),  LAM  200012  (11  V 1970)  and  LAM  200013  (10  V 1973).  Other  her- 
barium specimens  examined  included  those  from  BPI  (Brown  VII  1932,  Shear 
4 X 1935,  Shear  1 II  1903);  CUP  (Howard  Cayuga  Flora  48),  FLAS  (1862, 
1863,  1864,  21 183,  46426);  ILL  (Rogers  14-15  III  1958),  Ellis,  North  American 
Flora  (1363  a & b),  Ravanel  Fungi  Americana  (334  and  1877).  Schweinitz 
collections  from  herbaria  E,  FH,  K,  PH  and  UPS  were  additional  non- 
Georgian  specimens  examined. 

Fresh  material  and  2%  KOH  revived  dry  material  were  cut  on  a Bailey 
freezing  microtome  and  mounted  in  lactophenol  or  lactophenol-cotton  blue; 
additional  material  was  killed  and  fixed  in  FAA,  paraffin  embedded  and  the 
resulting  sections  stained  with  hematoxylin  and  methylene  blue. 

Camera  lucida  drawings  were  made  by  DRR;  composite  drawings  from 
direct  observation  of  sectioned  material  were  done  by  F.E.  Runyan. 

RESULTS 

Thallus  Development 

The  general  appearance  of  early  thallus  formation  was  as  cream  to  buff 
colored  tufts  of  mycelium  on  twigs  and  on  some  leaves  of  the  American  beech 
(LAM  200000).  The  fungus  soma  developed  in  accumulations  of  the  exudate  of 
the  wooly  aphid  insect,  which  utilizes  F.  grandifolia  as  a host  plant.  Limited 
mycelial  growth  was  seen  on  the  ground  at  time  of  collection.  The  nonpig- 


1978 


Foliicolous  Genus  Scorias 


3 


mented  hyphae  exhibited  two  distinct  zones  in  the  wall.  In  cross  section  of 
older  hyphae  (Fig.  1 A),  the  outermost  zone  was  widest,  measuring  an  average 
15 fjL.  The  outer  boundary  of  the  inner- wall  zone  was  sharply  delineated  and 
measured  approximately  \/x  in  diameter.  The  cell  lumen  containing  the  proto- 
plast averaged  6/jl  in  diameter.  Cells  were  generally  rectangular;  size  was 
variable  (Fig.  IB).  The  outer-wall  zone  was  present  in  the  apical  cell  of 
presumed  actively  growing  hyphae  (Fig.  1C)  and  became  wider  in  diameter  than 
the  inner-wall  zone  in  cells  progressively  subtending  the  apical  cell.  The  wall 
formed  a constriction  at  sites  corresponding  to  the  location  of  septa  traversing 
the  cell  lumen.  In  median  cell  focus,  a centrally  located  gap  could  be  detected  in 
the  isodiametric  septa. 


Figure  1.  Hyphae.  A.  Cross  section  of  hyphae,  approx.  1300X;  B.  hyphae  illustrating 
two  wall  zones,  approx.  1000X;  C.  tip  of  young  hypha,  approx.  1000X. 


4 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  288 


Hyphal  organization  was  effected  largely  by  adherence  of  outer  wall  sur- 
faces; reinforcement  by  cell  fusions  resulted  in  cytoplasmic  continuity.  Hyphae 
adhering  together  in  small  numbers  for  short  distances,  diverging  individually 
or  in  small  numbers  and  readhering  with  single  or  grouped  hyphae,  maintained 
a loose  mycelial  subiculum  in  localized  areas  on  the  supporting  plant  surface. 
The  basic  hyphal  organization  appeared  as  strands.  Strand  construction  was 
similar  throughout  thallus  development.  The  strand  was  usually  rounded  in  a 
cross-section  outline;  the  component  hyphae  were  more  or  less  parallel. 

The  somatic  mycelium  was  well  developed  at  a point  in  time  represented 
by  specimen  LAM  200001.  The  hyphal  wall  construction  was  similar  to  that 
described  in  LAM  200000.  The  outer-wall  zone  measured  5-15 /x  in  diameter.  An 
irregular  verrucose  deposition  could  be  detected  on  hyphal  surfaces  in  direct 
contact  with  other  hyphal  strands  which  were  exposed  to  the  atmosphere.  The 
inner-wall  zone  measured  approximately  1 /jl  in  diameter.  An  interzonal  area 
was  identifiable  which  varied  in  width  from  almost  nil  to  \/jl:  it  could  be 
recognized  by  dark  lines  of  varying  length,  oriented  generally  perpendicular  to 
the  axis  of  the  hyphae,  radiating  from  the  outer  surface  of  the  inner-wall  zone 
into  the  outer-wall  zone.  Pigmentation  occurred  first  on  exposed  strand  sur- 
faces. The  inner-wall  zone  of  mature  hyphal  strands  was  initially  achromatic  and 
became  darkened  with  a deposition  of  a pigment  assumed  to  be  melanin.  The 
outer-wall  zone  was  also  initially  achromatic  and  became  darkened  with  a 
pigment  similar  to  that  of  the  inner  zone,  but  of  less  intensity. 

Mature  stromata  produced  by  the  somatic  mycelium  of  S.  spongiosa  had  a 
definite  internal  structure  (Figs.  2 & 3).  Collection  LAM  200013  is  representa- 
tive of  mature  stroma  structure.  It  measured  1 1 .6  cm  in  length  and  5.5  cm  at  its 
highest  point.  Fig  2 is  a diagrammatic  representation  of  the  stroma  viewed 
lengthwise;  Fig  3 represents  a cross  section  at  a level  indicated  by  the  arrow  in 
Fig  2.  The  mycelial  development  radiated  upward  and  outward  from  the  sup- 
porting twig.  The  hyphae  coalesced  to  form  mycelial  strands,  which  were 


1 


Figure  2.  Diagrammatic  representation  of  stroma  lengthwise  profile.  Note  enlargement 
of  stroma  in  area  represented  by  arrow  in  Figure  3. 


1978 


Foliicolous  Genus  Scorias 


5 


Figure  3.  Cross-section  view  of  mature  stroma,  approx.  3X.  Supporting  twig  would  be 
located  at  lower  center  portion. 


largest  in  the  lower  center  of  the  stroma.  These  central  strands  were  formed  in 
a lacunate  region  within  the  stroma  which  was  also  the  highest  portion  (Arrow, 
Fig.  2;  Fig.  3).  Above  the  central  labyrinth,  the  mycelial  strands  branched 
more  frequently  resulting  in  a compacted  layer  1-2  cm  deep,  which  formed  the 
outermost  region  of  the  stroma.  Reproductive  structures  ultimately  developed 
on  the  exposed  surface  of  the  stroma.  In  the  outermost  compacted  region  of 
developing  stroma,  the  hyphae  comprising  the  outer  layers  of  the  component 
mycelial  strands  were  fully  pigmented;  hyphal  walls  in  the  inner  mycelial 
strand  core  were  hyaline  to  yellowish.  In  mature  stroma  (Fig.  3)  collected  in 
late  spring  and  bearing  pseudothecia  (LAM  200013),  the  strands  in  the  outer- 
most compacted  portion  were  fully  pigmented  and  most  were  surrounded  by  a 
nonpigmented  layer  representing  the  individual  hyphae  of  new  growth  on  the 
strand  surface. 

The  dry  stroma  enlarged  on  contact  with  moisture.  A rough  estimation 
was  made  of  structure  modification  upon  wetting  by  calculating  weight  in- 
crease. Sections  cut  of  collection  LAM  200013  were  weighed  before  and  after 
wetting  in  a 10%  formalin  solution.  An  average  1.4%  increase  in  weight  was 
noted.  Lack  of  appropriate  material  precluded  confirmation  of  these  data  by 
use  of  additional  stroma. 


6 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  288 


CONIDIOGENY 

A phialidic  anamorphic  centrum  was  present  at  the  tips  of  the  mycelial 
strands  in  collections  LAM  200000  and  LAM  200014  on  the  cream  to  buff- 
colored  tufts  of  mycelium  (Fig.  4).  Within  the  hyaline  strand  apex,  the  con- 
idiogenous  system  was  initiated  by  profuse  transverse  cell  division  in  the 
centrally  positioned  parallel  hyphae. 

The  short  cells  of  the  centrally  located  dividing  hyphal  strands  were  dis- 
tinct from  larger  elongate  cells  of  the  hyphae  in  the  outermost  strand  layers. 
Additional  hyaline  cells  were  produced  from  these  short  cells,  which  in  turn 
branched  toward  the  strand  center.  Sympodial  branching  was  initiated  from  a 
site  immediately  below  the  apical  septum  and  generally  opposite  a conidioge- 
nous  site  (Fig.  8B).  Limited  apical  expansion  resulted  in  a branched  system  of 
phialogenic  hyphae  of  one  to  several  cells  in  length.  Phialospores  were  pro- 
duced from  usually  only  one  place  on  the  conidiogenous  cell  near  the  upper- 
most septum,  less  frequently  in  the  middle  of  the  cell,  or  at  the  hyphal  tip  ( Fig. 
8A-E).  No  observations  were  made  on  initial  spore  development  from  living 
material.  The  first  conidium  was  apparently  formed  as  a small  tubular  protru- 
sion which  was  blown  out  from  the  conidiogenous  cell  (Fig.  8 A).  Successive 
spores  were  produced  through  a collarette  (Fig.  8D,  E). 

A dark  brown  pigment  appeared  in  the  inner-wall  zone  of  the  short-celled 
hyphae  from  which  the  conidiogenous  centers  were  initiated,  as  well  as  in  cells 
of  adjacent  strand  hyphae  with  longer  cells.  The  outermost  nonpigmented 
hyphae  of  the  strand  apex  was  separated  from  the  enlarged  conidiogenous 
centers  from  this  time  on.  Lateral  expansion  of  the  anamorphic  centrum 
coincided  with  proliferation  of  conidiogenous  hyphae  and  production  of  conidia; 
the  conidia  became  compacted  in  the  middle  of  the  conidiogenous  center, 
creating  a locule.  A necklike  extension  was  developed  beyond  the  sporogenous 
area  by  a convergence  and  elongation  of  a layer  of  dark  strand  hyphae  surround- 
ing a central  cylinder  of  nonbranching  sterile  hyaline  phialogenic  hyphae.  The 
outer  darkly  pigmented  hyphal  layer  eventually  ceased  to  grow;  the  hyaline 
inner  layer  of  hyphae  extended  beyond  the  outer  layer,  became  reflexed, 
resulting  in  what  Batista  and  Ciferri  (1963a)  referred  to  as  a fimbriated  ostiole. 
Conidia  appeared  to  be  initially  forced  through  a space  between  the  hyphae  of 
the  hyaline  core,  thus  creating  a channel  to  the  end  of  the  neckline  extension. 
These  and  subsequent  conidia  were  exuded  in  a slimelike  matrix  which  collected 
as  a droplet  at  the  apex  of  the  neck. 

The  phialidic  anamorphic  centrum  was  present  on  the  surface  of  the 
well-developed  stroma;  it  was  well  represented  in  October  collections  as  well  as 
in  collections  from  later  in  the  year.  Initiation  of  these  conidium  forming  areas  is 
identical  to  that  described  from  collections  LAM  200000  (Fig.  5);  the  resulting 
conidia  were  identical.  Flowever,  the  phialidic  anamorphic  centrum  was  formed 
in  short  mycelial  strands  of  darkly  pigmented  hyphae  which  radiated  from  the 
stroma  surface.  The  length  of  the  subtending  strand  varied.  None  of  these 
pycnidium-like  structures  was  seen  in  this  later  stage  to  have  an  apical  continua- 
tion of  the  outer  mycelial  strand  hyphae  into  a necklike  extension. 


1978 


Foliicolous  Genus  Scorias 


7 


Figure  4.  Asexual  fruit  body  with  phialidic  anamorphic  centrum,  approx.  300X. 


8 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  288 


Figure  5.  Asexual  fruit  body  with  phialidic  anamorphic  centrum,  approx.  1000X. 


Figure  6.  Stroma  surface  detail  illustrating  ascocarps,  approx.  30X. 

Ascogeny 

Ascocarp  formation  was  initiated  by  internal  proliferation  within  a myce- 
lial strand  found  on  the  stromatal  surface  (Fig.  6)  and  culminated  in  a prehyme- 
nial  structure  designated  here  the  protopseudothecium.  Eight  or  more  indi- 
vidual hyphal  strands  from  the  surface  network  recoalesced  in  strand  forma- 


1978 


Foliicolous  Genus  Scorias 


9 


tion.  Elongation  of  the  strand  appeared  to  be  from  the  apical  ends  of  the 
component  hyphae.  The  mycelial  strand  organization  was  initially  similar  to 
that  found  in  the  central  and  compacted  areas  of  the  stroma,  whereby  parallel 
anastomosing  hyphae  formed  into  a rounded  branch;  the  relative  position  of 
hyphae  in  the  outer  to  central  areas  remained  constant.  All  cells  were  found  to 
be  melanin-like  pigmented.  The  onset  of  protopseudothecial  differentiation 
was  signaled  by  three  areas  of  hyphal  proliferation.  A mycelial  strand  where  a 
protopseudothecium  was  to  be  initiated  was  comprised  of  several  hyphal 
zones;  configuration  patterns  could  be  discerned  in  the  outermost  hyphal  layers, 
in  the  middle  hyphal  layers  and  in  the  remaining  innermost  hyphae.  The 
outermost  layers  did  not  depart  from  the  basic  parallel  strand  pattern  (Fig.  7B). 
The  hyphae  in  the  middle  layers  began  three-dimensional  dichotomous  and 
trichotomous  branching.  The  cells  were  shorter  but  similar  in  cell  shapes  as 
compared  to  the  outer  most  parallel  hyphae  (Fig.  7D).  The  hyphae  in  the 
innermost  layers  proliferated  by  formation  of  small  isodiametric  hyphae.  These 
frequently  branched,  intermingled  hyphae  were  generally  oriented  inwardly, 
perpendicular  to  the  strand  axis  (Fig.  7E).  All  hyphae  in  the  proto- 
pseudothecium had  the  basic  2-zone  wall  construction  described  earlier.  Pig- 
mentation developed  in  the  outer  layers  containing  the  parallel,  and  the  di-  and 
trichotomously  branched  hyphae  (Fig.  7B,  C),  but  not  in  the  isodiametric 
hyphae  in  the  center  of  the  protopseudothecial  strand  (Fig.  7D,  E).  Develop- 
ment of  the  outer  layers  of  protopseudothecial  strand  kept  pace  with  innermost 
core  layer  so  that  the  pigment  containing  layers  surrounded  the  inner  core  of 
hyaline  isodiametric  hyphae  at  all  times.  Proliferation  of  the  latter  and  sub- 
sequent increase  in  width  began  in  the  lower  portion  of  the  proto- 
pseudothecium and  became  widest  in  the  center  of  the  ascocarp  and  terminated 
in  an  ostiole  at  the  uppermost  part. 

Thus,  the  basic  ascocarp  subtended  by  a stalk  (Fig.  7 A)  was  formed  before 
appearance  of  the  ascogenous  system.  No  further  strand  development  ap- 
peared to  occur  after  the  inner  core  of  hyaline  hyphae  was  produced  in  the 
protopseudothecium.  The  portion  of  the  protopseudothecial  strand  forming  the 
ascocarp  wall  appeared  plectenchyma-like  in  that  the  intertwined  cells  became 
affixed  together,  presumably  by  wall  fusion.  However,  the  centrally  located 
nonpigmented  hyphae  retained  their  individual  identity  (Fig.  7E).  In  a longitu- 
dinal section  of  a protopseudothecium,  the  tissue  might  appear  as 
pseudoparenchyma  in  both  the  wall  and  the  central  mycelial  mass.  This  effect, 
as  represented  in  the  drawings  such  as  those  by  Batista  and  Ciferri  (1963b)  for 
S.  spongiosa,  is  due  to  the  intermingled,  highly-branched  hyphae  in  the  pig- 
mented and  nonpigmented  layer  in  section  showing  the  lumen  of  component 
cells  from  various  angles  separated  by  the  wide  walls. 

The  ascogenous  system  (Fig.  7F)  appeared  at  the  lower  end  of  the 
pseudothecium.  No  ascogonium  was  detected;  asci  appeared  to  originate  as 
croziers  on  proliferating  ascogenous  hyphae.  Asci  matured  first  in  the  center  of 
the  developing  hymenium.  The  ascus  wall  was  isodiametrically  thickened  only 
until  the  ascus  mother  cell  elongated  to  full  size.  An  ascus  devoid  of  spores  was 
cylindrical  (Fig.  8F).  The  elongating  ascus  mother  cells  appeared  to  push  up- 


10 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  288 


Figure  7.  Ascocarp,  approx.  1000X.  A.  mycelial  strand  subtending  ascogenous  center  as 
stalk;  B.  base  of  asocarp;  C.  dark  tissue  layer  delimiting  ascocarp;  D.  inner  zone  of 
hyaline  hyphae;  E.  lateral  periphyses  lining  locule;  F.  ascogenous  hyphae  bearing  asci; 
G.  ostiole. 


1978 


Foliicolous  Genus  Scorias 


11 


ward  among  the  nonpigmented  hyphae  occupying  the  center  of  the 
pseudothecium  (Fig.  7).  As  the  hymenium  developed,  the  nonpigmented 
hyphae  were  displaced  from  the  lower  75  percent  of  the  original  areas  they 
occupied.  The  interface  at  the  place  of  origin  of  nonpigmented  hyphae  with 
pigmented  strand  hyphae,  effectively  limited  displacement.  The  resulting  dis- 
tortion created  space  within  the  pseudothecium  (Fig.  7). 

The  shape  of  an  ascus  containing  spores  had  been  modified  to  obpyriform; 
the  wall  of  such  an  ascus  was  thickened  at  the  ascus  apex  with  an  evident  nasse 
apicale  (Reynolds  1971)  and  tapered  in  width  toward  the  ascus  base  (Fig.  8G). 
Mature  ascospores  were  hyaline  and  traversed  by  three  septa.  Discharged  asci 
were  found  to  have  a discernible  outer  tunica  surrounding  a tubular  inner 
tunica.  Ascospores  were  frequently  seen  attached  to  the  outer  surfaces  of 
ascocarps,  some  having  germinated.  No  ascus  was  found  to  be  discharged 
intact  from  the  ascocarp  as  suggested  by  Ellis  and  Everhart  (1892),  although  in 
some  preparations,  pressure  applied  to  a coverslip  would  result  in  dislocation 
of  individual  asci  and  whole  hymenia  through  the  ostiole. 


Figure  8.  Phialides  and  asci,  approx.  2000X.  A,  B.  enterblastic  monophialidic  con- 
idiophores  bearing  young  conidia;  D,  E.  phialides  with  collarettes;  C.  conidia;  F.  young 
ascus  before  ascosporogenesis;  G.  mature  spore-bearing  ascus. 


12 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  288 


DISCUSSION 

The  terms  teliomorphosis  and  anamorphosis  have  been  introduced  (Hen- 
nebert  and  Weresub  1977)  in  relation  to  a restatement  of  the  International  Code 
of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  Article  59,  “Names  of  fungi  with  a pleomorphic 
life  cycle  and  of  fossils  assigned  to  form  genera.”  These  terms  refer  to  basic 
reproductive  modes  of  the  holomorphic  fungus  and  were  defined  as  follows: 
teliomorphosis  — “characterizing  form  that  is  involved  in  producing  meiotic 
diaspores  — in  Ascomycetes,  an  ascocarp  or  its  equivalent  producing  asci  and 
ascospores.  . . anamorphosis  — “The  imperfect  state  . . . the  asexual  mi- 
totic diaspore  expression  of  a fungus  ...” 

The  term  anamorphic  centrum  is  utilized  here  as  a Deuteromycete  applica- 
tion of  the  Luttrellian  Ascomycete  centrum  concept  This  and  other  related  terms 
are  defined  as  follows:  teliomorphic  centrum  = centrum  sensu  Luttrell  (1951); 
anamorphic  centrum  = the  reproductive  or  conidiogenous  system  component  of 
an  asexual  fruit  body;  phialidic  anamorphic  centrum  = an  anamorphic  centrum 
where  the  conidium  is  enteroblastically  produced  via  a phialide. 

The  conidiogenous  system  described  here  consists  of  enteroblastic,  ba- 
sically monophialidic,  conidiophores  resembling  that  of  two  epimycotic 
Coelomycete  genera.  The  illustrations  by  Seeler  (1943)  of  Eleuthoromycella 
mycophyla  von  Hoehnel  and  especially  Eleutheromyces  sublatus  (Fr.)Fuckel 
indicate  strikingly  similar  acropleurogenous  branched  conidiophores.  Both 
species  are  described  as  having  wall  tissue  which  is  pseudoparenchymatous 
(textura  angularia)  rather  than  of  parallel,  somewhat  gelatinized  hyphae  (tex- 
tura  oblita),  as  found  in  S.  spongiosa.  The  pigmentation  of  E.  subulatus  is  a 
nectriaceous  burnt  sienna,  and  that  of  E. mycophyla  is  carbonaceous.  The  walls 
of  S.  spongiosa  pycnidia  range  from  hyaline  to  melinoid. 

Only  one  anamorphosis  is  associated  with  the  life  history  of  S.  spongiosa. 
The  term  anamorphic  centrum  has  been  used  to  emphasize  a continuity  in 
terms  of  the  conidiogenous  system  and  the  conidia  produced  in  association  with 
the  stroma  in  all  stages  of  development.  Morphological  forms  of  the  asexual 
fruit  body  found  here  can  be  assigned  to  various  pycnidial  genera.  Following 
Batista  and  Ciferri  (1963a),  these  would  be  Leptoxyphium  (globose,  sessile,  with 
no  neck),  Podoxyphium  (globose  stalked,  with  no  neck)  and  Microxyphium 
(cylindrical,  with  a neck).  Hughes  (1976)  speculatively  refers  to  similar  mor- 
phological forms  as  Polychaeton  and  Conidiocarpus  (and  perhaps 
Scolecoxyphium).  The  position  of  the  anamorphic  centrum  in  the  rapidly 
expanding  and  rounding  mycelial  strands  (i.e.,  LAM  200000)  would  seemingly 
cause  a cylindrical  pycnidium-like  structure.  Continued  growth  of  the  sur- 
rounding hyphae  would  produce  a “neck.”  This  observation  is  made  especially 
clear  when  conidiogenous  systems  are  to  be  found  centrally  located  in  mycelial 
strands  with  the  ostiole  eliminated  by  the  continued  growth  of  the  strand  tip. 
The  conidiogenous  systems  found  in  the  more  mature  stroma  develop  at  the 
ends  of  narrow  hyphal  strands.  Unlike  the  pycnidia  with  a “neck,”  these 
strands  extend  from  the  surface  of  a stroma  and  terminate  with  the  formation 
of  the  conidiogenous  center. 


1978 


Foliicolous  Genus  Scorias 


13 


Therefore,  the  generic  concepts  of  these  pycnidiaceous  fungi  as  set  forth 
in  literature  such  as  Batista  and  Ciferri  (1963a)  and  Hughes  (1976)  are  ques- 
tionable; many  of  these  appear  to  be  based  on  growth  cycle  artifacts  given 
undue  taxonomic  significance.  Experimental  data  derived  from  pure  culture 
work  would  go  far  in  resolving  the  problem.  Detailed  observations  on  a 
chronologically  obtained  series  of  collections  from  a single  natural  locality, 
such  as  utilized  in  this  study,  may  prove  a valid  alternative. 

The  teliomorphic  type  is  modified  dothideaceous.  The  ascus  produced  by 
S.  spongiosa  is  functionally  bitunicate;  microscopic  mounts  reveal  the  nasse 
apicale  apparatus  proposed  by  Chadefaud  and  explained  by  Reynolds  (1971). 
The  sterile  elements  peripherally  produced  from  the  wall,  which  hang  into  the 
locule,  are  not  pseudoparaphyses  sensu  Wehmeyer.  Therefore,  in  agreement 
with  von  Arx  and  Muller  (1975),  the  concept  of  these  structures  as  pleosporace- 
ous(Corlett  1973),  is  rejected.  These  structures  originate  as  outgrowths  from  the 
pseudoparenchymatous  peripheral  layer  of  the  ascocarp  locule  and  the  ostiole. 
The  term  for  these  structures  in  an  ostiole  is  periphyses.  Because  they  are 
produced  to  a lower  level  in  the  ascocarp  but  are  not  attached  in  the  hymenium 
as  are  paraphyses  and  additionally  are  not  involved  in  centrum  formation  as  are 
pseudoparaphyses,  they  are  regarded  as  laterally  positioned  periphyses  or 
periphysoids  (Barr  1976).  Samuels  (1973)  discussed  centripetal  paraphyses  and 
apical  paraphyses  as  found  in  unitunicate  species. 

In  Scorias,  as  in  other  Ascomycetes,  taxon  definition  is  typed  with  the 
teliomorphosis.  No  Ascomycete  species  is  known  to  produce  more  than  one 
teliomorphosis  sexual  state,  but  many  are  known  which  produce  one  or  more 
anamorphoses  from  the  same  mycelium  or  thallus.  My  attempts  to  work  with 
Scorias  spongiosa  in  artificial  culture  failed  to  yield  the  desired  reproductive 
states.  Instead,  a hopefully  acceptable  compromise  has  been  utilized  involving 
sequentially  collected  herbarium  specimens,  which  is  similar  to  that  utilized  by 
Luttrell  and  Muthappa  (1974).  Holomorphic  data  was  derived  from  collections 
taken  periodically  from  a particular  locality  over  a time  span  during  which  the 
fungus  developed  in  nature.  Additional  and  supportive  information  was  derived 
from  usual  herbarium  specimens  available  on  loan  from  the  institutions  previ- 
ously mentioned.  Consequently,  the  author  is  reasonably  convinced,  in  absence 
of  definite  proof  sustained  by  data  from  artificial  culture  methods,  that  the 
stroma  development  is  accurately  presented  for  a localized  strain  of  S.  spon- 
giosa, and  that  the  reproductive  states  are  likely  to  be  those  actually  produced 
by  the  species,  rather  than  being  associated  with  the  stroma  of  S.  spongiosa  by 
virtue  of  habitat  preference  of  sooty  mold  fungi  with  similar  morphological 
features. 

Imperative  in  profiling  the  capnodiaceous  whole-organism  is  an  absolute 
certainty  that  the  alternate  reproductive  states  are  biologically  associated.  M til- 
ler (1971),  in  a review  of  perfect-imperfect  connections  in  Ascomycetes, 
pointed  out  that  use  of  pure  culture  techniques  has  allowed  definite  proof  of 
connections  between  the  teliomorphosis  and  any  anamorphoses  produced  by 
one  organism.  Biological  connection  of  alternate  states  are  definitely  proved  in 


14 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  288 


artificial  cultivation,  where  this  method  is  possible,  by  use  of  spore-to-spore 
cultivation,  or  by  germination  of  one  spore  form  to  give  rise  to  a mycelium  in 
culture  which  produces  an  alternate  state.  Definite  proof  of  biological  connec- 
tion is  lacking,  and  only  suspected,  where  demonstration  of  a single  hyphal 
strand  organically  connecting  several  alternate  states  is  found  in  randomly 
obtained  herbarium  specimens. 

My  concept  of  sooty  mold  fungi  is  derived  from  several  thousand  collec- 
tions I have  made  in  all  of  the  neotropical  countries  and  in  some  areas  of  the 
paleotropics,  on  the  examination  of  all  herbarium  specimens  I can  locate  which 
have  been  cited  in  the  literature,  and  from  attempts  at  experimental  culture 
work  with  field-derived  isolates.  Consequently,  I strongly  advocate  cogni- 
zance of  the  specialized  microenvironment  into  which  sooty  mold  fungi  have 
adapted  when  systematic  judgments  are  formulated  as  well  as  in  the  perception 
of  pleomorphic  or  alternate  reproductive  state  relationships.  Therefore,  espe- 
cially in  capnodiaceous  fungi,  systematic  relationships  should  be  determined 
from  data  derived  from  artificial  culture  of  the  species  as  well  as  from  speci- 
mens collected  in  nature.  Analytical  analysis  of  the  holomorphic  sooty  mold 
species  demands  a nonintuitive  laboratory  protocol  in  order  that  realistic 
taxonomic  innovation  can  be  made. 

The  intuitive  “analytical  analysis”  of  the  interpretation  of  the  sooty  mold 
fungi  was  summarized  by  Hughes  (1976).  This  viewpoint  is  in  direct  contrast  to 
the  rendering  of  systematic  judgment  which  incorporates  experimental  data 
derived  from  a protocol  utilizing  pure  culture  techniques  such  as  that  demon- 
strated by  Simmons  (1969),  or  a chronologically  obtained  series  of  specimens 
from  a single  natural  collection  locality  such  as  that  utilized  by  Luttrell  and 
Muthappa  (1974).  Hughes  advocated  prima  facie  establishment  of  alternate 
reproductive  state  association  in  the  sooty  mold  colony  as  may  be  found  in 
randomly  collected  herbarium  collections.  The  a priori  taxonomy  proposed  by 
Hughes  (1976)  contains  the  highly  interesting,  but  biased,  insight  of  a Fungi 
Imperfecti  specialist.  However,  his  philosophical  commentary  was  unfortu- 
nately expressed  in  nomenclatoral  jargon  and,  lacking  experimental  data,  falls 
short  of  proper  systematic  documentation. 

The  annual  growth  and  reproduction  cycle  detected  in  the  sooty  mold 
fungus  S.  spongiosa  is  regarded  as  indicative  of  efficient  utilization  of  available 
microenvironmental  resources  under  the  influence  of  overall  seasonal  changes. 
This  species  and  others  in  the  family  Capnodiaceae  von  Hoehnel  exhibit  mor- 
phological and  life-history  features,  which  would  give  advantages  in  coping 
with  the  stressful  plant  surface-atmosphere  environment  in  which  they  exist. 
Thus,  concepts  of  thallus  and  fruit  body  development  should  be  justifiably 
influenced  by  habitat-related  data.  The  sooty  mold  colony  produced  in  nature 
by  the  capnodiaceous  fungi  should  basically  be  regarded  as  an  environmentally 
influenced  association  of  species  (Reynolds  1975;  Reynolds  and  Pohlad  1974). 
Any  attempt  at  analytical  analysis  of  the  fungi  in  the  plant  surface  microenvi- 
ronment will  have  to  be  based  on  a convincing,  nonintuitive  demonstration  of 


1978 


Foliicolous  Genus  Scorias 


15 


biological  relationships  between  teliomorpheses  and  anamorpheses  of  fungi 
which  thrive  in  this  habitat.  Definite  proof  of  these  relationships  is  necessary 
because  ultimately  any  patterns  of  reproductive  state  associations  should  be 
reflected  in  the  taxonomy  of  these  highly  evolved  Ascomycetes. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

Acknowledgment  is  made  to  Dr.  E.S.  Luttrell  for  assistance  with  the 
Georgia  collections,  and  to  the  National  Science  Foundation,  The  American 
Philosophical  Society,  the  Los  Angeles  County  Natural  History  Museum 
Foundation  for  financial  support. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Arx,  J.  A.  von,  andE.  Muller.  A reevaluation  ofthe  bitunicate  Ascomycetes  with  keys 
to  families  and  genera.  Studies  in  Mycology  No.  9.  Centraalbureau  voor  Schimmel- 
cultures  Baam,  The  Netherlands.  159  p. 

Barr,  M.E.  1976.  Perspectives  in  the  Ascomycotina.  Mem.  New  York  Bot.  Garden. 
28:1-8. 

Batista,  C.,  and  R.  Ciferri.  1963a.  The  sooty-molds  of  the  family  Asbolisiaceae. 
Quademo  31:1-229. 

and . 1963b.  Capnodiales.  Saccardoa  2:1-296. 

Corlett,  M.  1973.  Observations  and  comments  on  the  Pleospora  centrum  type.  Nova 
Hedwigia  24:347-360. 

Ellis,  J.B.,  and  B.M.  Everhart.  1892.  The  North  American  Pyrenomycetes.  Publ.  by 
the  authors.  Newfield,  New  Jersey.  793  p. 

Hennebert,  G.  L.  and  L.  K.  Weresub.  1977.  Terms  for  states  and  forms  of  fungi,  their 
names  and  types.  Mycotoxon  6:207-21 1. 

Fries,  E.  1829.  Systema  mycologicum  3:291. 

Hoehnel,  F von.  1909.  Fragmente  zur  mykologie.  VIII.  Mitteilung,  no.  354-406.  Set- 
zungsber.  Kaiserl.  Akad.  Wiss.,  Wien,  Math.-naturwiss.  Kl.,  Abt.,  1,  118:1157- 
1246. 

1910.  Fragmente  zur  mykologie.  XI.  Mitteilung,  no.  527-573.  Setzungsber. 

Kaiserl.  Akad.  Wiss.,  Wien,  Math.-naturwiss.  Kl.,  Abt.  1,  119:617-679. 

Hughes,  S.J.  1976.  Sooty  Moulds.  Mycologia  68:693-820. 

Lloyd,  C.G.  1921.  Mycological  notes  no.  65.  C.G.  Lloyd  6:1067. 

Luttrell,  E.S.  1951.  Lniv.  of  Missouri  Studies.  No.  3,  Taxonomy  of  the  Pyrenomy- 
cetes. 24:1-120. 

and  B.N.  Muthappa.  1974.  Morphology  of  a new  species  of  Aulacostroma 

(Hemisphaeriales).  Mycologia  66:563-579. 

Muller,  E.  1971.  Imperfect-perfect  connections  in  Ascomycetes.  In  Taxonomy  of 
Fungi  Imperfecti.  B.  Kendrick,  ed.  Univ.  Toronto  Press.  309  p. 

Reynolds,  D.R.  1971.  Wall  structure  of  a bitunicate  ascus.  Planta  98:244-257. 

1975.  Observations  on  growth  forms  of  sooty  mold  fungi.  Nova  Hedwigia 

26:179-193. 


16 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  288 


and  B.  R.  Pohlad.  1974.  Cyclic  patterns  of  central  Florida  sooty  molds.  Proc. 

Iowa  Acad.  Sci.  81:12-13. 

Samuels,  G.J.  1973.  Perithecial  development  in  Hypomyces  aurantius.  Amer.  Jour.  Bot. 
60:268-276. 

Schweinitz,  L.D.  1822.  Synopsis  fungorum  carolinae  superioris.  Schr.  fung.  Naturf. 
Gesell.  Lepizig  1:20-131. 

Seeler,  E.V.  1943.  Several  fungicolous  fungi.  Farlowia  1:119-133. 

Simmons,  E.G.  1969.  Perfect  states  of  Stemphylium.  Mycologia  61:1-26. 

Accepted  for  publication  February  2,  1977. 


50 7,  73 

Cadges 


NUMBER  289 
MARCH  20,  1978 


OTOLITHS  AND  OTHER  FISH  REMAINS 
FROM  THE  CHUMASH  MIDDEN  AT  RINCON  POINT  (SBa-1) 
SANTA  BARBARA-VENTURA  COUNTIES,  CALIFORNIA 


By  Richard  W.  Huddleston  and  Lloyd  W.  Barker 


NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCENCC 


Published  by  the  NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM 
OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007 


SERIAL  PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE 
NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 


Prior  to  November  30,  1973,  publications  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  have  appeared 
under  various  formats — Leaflet  Series,  Museum  Graphic,  Science  Series,  Study  Guides,  Con- 
tributions in  Science,  Contributions  in  History,  Science  Bulletins,  unnumbered  catalogs  of 
exhibitions,  and  other  miscellaneous  publications.  The  Museum  now  publishes  the  following 
serials  at  irregular  intervals  as  CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE,  HISTORY  BULLETINS, 
SCIENCE  BULLETINS,  EDUCATION  SERIES,  HISTORY  SERIES,  and  SCIENCE  SE- 
RIES. The  Contributions  are  short  papers  of  octavo  size.  The  Bulletins  are  longer,  compre- 
hensive papers  of  quarto  size.  The  Series  are  papers  of  variable  lengths  of  quarto  or  larger 
size.  Papers  in  each  serial  are  numbered  separately  and  consecutively. 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  contain  articles  in  the  earth  and  life  sciences,  presenting 
results  of  original  research.  Emphasis  is  intended  principally  for  papers  allied  to  biosystematic 
research,  but  other  subjects  and  review-oriented  ones  will  be  considered.  Number  1 was  issued 
on  January  23,  1957.  Contributions  must  be  not  less  than  8 nor  exceed  72  printed  pages. 


INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  AUTHORS 

Acceptance  of  manuscripts  will  be  determined  by  the  significance  of  new  information.  Priority 
will  be  given  to  manuscripts  by  staff  members.  All  manuscripts  must  be  recommended  by  the 
curator  in  charge  of  each  discipline  or  by  the  Editorial  Board.  Manuscripts  must  conform  to 
the  specifications  listed  below.  They  will  be  examined  for  suitability  by  the  Editorial  Board 
and  will  include  review  by  specialists  outside  the  Museum. 

Authors  must  adhere  to  the  International  Code  of  Nomenclature  of  Bacteria  and  Viruses, 
International  Code  of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  and  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature, including  their  respective  recommendations.  Further,  authors  proposing  new  taxa  in 
a CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  must  indicate  that  all  primary  types  have  been  deposited 
in  an  appropriate  scientific  institution  of  their  choice  and  must  cite  that  institution  by  name. 

MANUSCRIPT  FORM. — (1)  In  preparation  of  copy  follow  the  1972  CBE  Style  Manual, 
third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapters  5 and  6.  (2)  Footnotes  should  be  avoided;  acknowledgments 
as  footnotes  will  not  be  accepted.  (3)  An  informative  abstract  must  be  included  for  all  papers. 
(4)  A Spanish  summary  is  required  for  all  manuscripts  dealing  with  Latin  American  subjects. 
Summaries  in  other  languages  are  not  required  but  are  strongly  recommended.  (5)  A differ- 
ential diagnosis  must  accompany  any  newly  proposed  taxon.  (6)  Submit  two  copies  of  manu- 
script. 

ILLUSTRATIONS. — All  illustrations,  including  maps  and  photographs,  will  be  referred  to 
as  figures.  All  illustrations  should  be  of  sufficient  clarity  and  in  proper  proportions  for  reduc- 
tion to  CONTRIBUTIONS  page  size.  In  preparing  illustrations  and  legends  consult  the  1972 
CBE  Style  Manual,  third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapter  5.  Submit  only  illustrations  made  with 
permanent  ink  and  glossy  photographic  prints  of  good  contrast.  Submit  duplicate  copies  of 
all  illustrations.  Original  illustrations  will  be  returned  after  the  manuscript  has  been  published. 

PROOF. — Authors  will  be  sent  galley  proofs  which  should  be  corrected  and  returned  promptly. 
No  changes  or  alterations,  other  than  typesetting  corrections,  will  be  allowed  unless  paid  by 
author.  Requests  for  reprints  may  be  placed  through  the  Editor. 

R.  Edward  Ostermeyer 
Editor 


All  communications  concerning  manuscripts  and  exchange  of  or  purchase  of  publications 
should  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Museum  Publications,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 

Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America  by  Chapman’s  Phototypesetting  on  70#  Patina  Book 


OTOLITHS  AND  OTHER  FISH  REMAINS 
FROM  THE  CHUMASH  MIDDEN  AT  RINCON  POINT  (SBa-1), 
SANTA  BARBARA-VENTURA  COUNTIES,  CALIFORNIA1 


By  Richard  W.  Huddleston2  and  Lloyd  W.  Barker3 


Abstract:  Material  from  a Chumash  village  site  yielded  45  species  of 
fishes  (29  kinds  of  bony  fishes,  and  16  kinds  of  sharks,  skates  and  rays).  The 
fish  remains,  ranging  in  size  from  less  than  1 to  75  mm,  consisted  of  otoliths, 
teeth,  jaws  (dentary,  premaxillary  and  palatines),  vertebrae,  stings,  dermal 
denticles,  dorsal  spines  and  scales.  As  indicated  by  the  species  recovered,  the 
Chumash  inhabitants  fished  from  surface  regions  and  surf  zones  to  depths 
exceeding  60  feet,  utilizing  hook  and  line,  gill  nets,  traps,  beach  seines,  har- 
poons, spears  and  capture  by  hand.  The  most  abundant  identified  remains 
were  otoliths  of  Genyonemus  lineatus,  scales  of  Sard  inops  caeruleus,  and 
dermal  denticles  of  Squatina  californica.  None  of  the  identified  remains 
showed  signs  of  having  been  altered  or  modified  for  use  in  ornamentation. 
Comparison  of  the  fishing  habits  of  the  inhabitants  of  SBa-1  and  Ven-3  in 
Ventura  indicated  a similar  level  of  advancement,  which  was  superior  and 
more  fishery-orientated  than  Ora- 190  in  Orange  County  and  SLO-2  in  San 
Luis  Obispo  County. 


INTRODUCTION 

Prior  to  the  completion  of  this  study  Lloyd  W.  Barker  lost  his  life  acting  as 
an  observer  for  the  California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  aboard  a com- 
mercial sealion  capturing  vessel,  which  capsized  in  the  Santa  Barbara  channel. 
Because  of  his  untimely  death,  any  errors  or  omissions  are  the  responsibility  of 
RWH. 

Fish  and  other  faunal  remains  of  midden  sites  usually  have  appeared  in 
archaeological  literature  as  simple  lists  of  identifications  without  any  interpre- 
tation or  significance.  In  particular,  remains  of  fishes  have  been  neglected, 
often  being  identified  only  as  “fish”  or  “shark”.  Otoliths  (fish  earstones)  play 
an  important  role  in  the  identification  of  fishes  recovered  from  middens.  The 
use  of  otoliths  in  archaeological  work  is  not  new,  being  employed  first  in  the 


1 Review  Committee  for  this  Contribution 
John  E.  Fitch 
W.I.  Follett 
Robert  J.  Lavenberg 

2Section  of  Vertebrate  Paleontology,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County, 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 


3 Deceased. 


2 


No.  289 


Contributions  in  Science 


latter  part  of  the  nineteenth  century  (Ihering  1891).  It  was  not  until  1969, 
however,  that  otoliths  were  used  on  a large  scale  (Fitch  1969a).  Fitch  noted 
approximately  19  species  of  fishes  represented  by  otoliths  from  a midden  in 
Ventura  County. 

All  bony  fishes  (fishes  other  than  sharks,  skates,  rays  and  chimaeroids) 
possess  some  type  of  discrete  aragonitic  concretion  in  the  semicircular  canals 
of  the  otic  capsules,  called  otoliths.  Although  not  well  understood,  the  otolith 
aids  in  the  hearing  and  balance  of  the  fish.  Since  almost  all  species  of  fishes 
have  distinctive  otoliths,  their  specific  identifications  can  be  made  with  ade- 
quate comparative  material. 

Bony  fishes  possess  three  pairs  of  otoliths;  the  sagittae,  lapilli  and  as- 
terisci.  Of  these,  the  sagitta  generally  is  the  largest,  most  frequently  encoun- 
tered, and  most  relied  upon  for  taxonomic  interpretation.  Many  conclusions 
have  been  drawn  regarding  the  Indians’  fish-eating  habits,  based  upon  the 
quantity  of  fish  vertebrae  (unidentified  as  to  species)  present  in  a given  sample 
from  different  levels  of  the  midden.  Fitch  (1972)  states  that  these  conclusions 
are  untrustworthy,  and  normally  indicate  only  that  fishes  were  present;  they  do 
not  furnish  an  index  of  numerical  abundance  or  importance. 

A relationship  exists  between  otolith  lengths  and  fish  lengths,  and  once 
this  relationship  has  been  defined  for  a given  species,  a reliable  estimate  of  a 
fish  size  can  be  ascertained  from  a single  midden  otolith.  Otoliths  can  be 
deposited  in  middens  by  predators  through  their  digestive  systems,  by  scaven- 
gers at  the  midden,  or  by  the  Indians.  Otoliths  that  have  passed  through  diges- 
tive systems  indicate  signs  of  erosion  on  all  surfaces.  Species  that  unlikely 
would  be  captured  by  the  inhabitants  for  food  because  of  their  small  size  or 
living  depth  could  be  of  predator  origin  in  the  midden,  and  this  often  can  be 
determined  by  the  degree  of  surface  erosion.  Caution  must  be  used  in  interpret- 
ing these  otoliths  in  relation  to  the  food  habits  and  fisheries  of  the  Indians. 
Indians  sometimes  would  consume  whole  small  fishes  (Follett  1967),  which 
offers  the  possibility  that  some  of  the  small  eroded  otoliths  could  reflect  pas- 
sage through  human  digestive  systems.  Whether  these  eroded  otoliths  have 
passed  through  a human  or  nonhuman  digestive  system  often  can  be  deter- 
mined by  examining  the  habits  of  the  fish  in  question.  For  example,  Fitch 
(1969a)  noted  a myctophid  otolith  (Ceratoscopelus  townsendi ) from  a Ventura 
midden.  The  depth  at  which  this  lantern  fish  lives  (rarely  coming  within  600 
feet  of  the  surface)  as  well  as  its  extremely  small  size  (about  three  inches)  was 
sufficient  evidence  to  indicate  that  this  fish  had  not  been  captured  directly  by 
the  inhabitants  nor  passed  through  a human  digestive  system;  rather,  it  was 
probably  from  the  stomach  of  some  predator. 

METHODS  AND  MATERIALS 

We  recovered  less  than  a hundred  pounds  of  midden  material  from  the 
site.  Our  methods  of  preparing  and  examining  the  field  sample  followed  closely 
methods  discussed  by  Fitch  (1967,  1969a,  1972).  The  field  sample  was  soaked 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


3 


in  a large  tub  of  water,  then  passed  through  a 14-inch  mesh  screen.  The  retained 
screenings  were  set  aside  to  dry.  Material  not  retained  by  the  first  screen  was 
then  passed  through  an  18-mesh  screen.  These  screenings  were  dried  in  an 
oven  at  a temperature  of  250-300°F.  The  material  that  was  not  retained  by  this 
second  screen  was  passed  through  a 30-mesh  screen.  Due  to  the  abundance  of 
ash  and  charcoal  in  the  midden  “dirt”  and  its  tendency  to  cling  to  all  other 
materials,  a secondary  screening  was  necessary.  The  freshly  dried  screenings 
were  soaked  separately  in  a solution  of  one  part  liquid  bleach  and  two  parts 
water  for  several  minutes,  then  rescreened.  This  made  the  screenings  cleaner 
and  reduced  them  in  weight  by  ten  percent.  These  procedures  greatly  enhanced 
our  ability  to  recognize  the  fish  remains  and  decreased  the  time  required  to 
examine  the  sample.  The  14-inch  screenings  were  examined  by  eye  for  the 
larger  fish  remains,  whereas  the  18-  and  30-mesh  screenings  were  sorted  a 
spoonful  at  a time  under  a binocular  microscope. 

HISTORY  AND  PREVIOUS  DIGGING 

The  Rincon  site  (SBa-1)  became  a historic  point  of  contact  with  the  land- 
ing of  Juan  Rodriquez  Cabrillo  in  October  1542.  The  village,  which  was  called 
Xucu  by  the  Indians,  was  visited  several  times  in  succeeding  centuries:  Sebas- 
tian Vizcaino,  1602-1603(7);  Gasparde  Portola,  1770;  and  Juan  Bautista  Anza, 
1776.  The  Rincon  area  had  been  ravaged  heavily  prior  to  our  study.  A massive 
amount  of  material  was  removed  by  Stephen  Bowers,  an  amateur  ar- 
chaeologist, in  the  early  1870’s,  but  there  are  no  reports  on  his  findings,  and  the 
material  subsequently  has  become  lost  (Rogers  1929).  Leon  De  Cessac,  a 
French  archaeologist,  probably  worked  ,at  the  site  during  the  early  1870’s  but 
these  reports  remain  unverified.  Rincon  was  worked  partly  in  the  1920’s  by 
archaeologists  D.B.  Rogers,  the  Catlin  brothers  and  W.C.  Toby  and  Jesse 
Wood.  In  1930,  Ronald  Olson  excavated  three  cemeteries  (Olson  1930).  Mar- 
shall McKusick  surveyed  the  Rincon  Point  area  in  1959  for  the  University  of 
California  at  Los  Angeles  (UCLA)  Archaeological  Survey.  W.H.  Harrison 
and  Patricia  Lyon,  then  with  the  University  of  California,  Santa  Barbara, 
excavated  several  burials  in  1959  and  1960.  Patrick  Finnerty,  formerly  of 
UCLA,  excavated  two  areas  in  1961  and  1964  (Finnerty  1961,  1964).  Personnel 
representing  the  UCLA  Archaeological  Survey  have  done  the  remainder  of  the 
excavations:  three  test  pits  in  April  1963  and  extensive  excavations  in  the 
summer  of  1966.  Unfortunately,  the  control  column  from  the  1966  excavation 
was  discarded  without  having  been  examined.  John  E.  Fitch,  California  De- 
partment of  Fish  and  Game,  removed  several  hundred  pounds  of  material 
during  the  1966  UCLA  excavations  and  reported  three  species  of  fishes:  north- 
ern anchovy  (Engraulis  mordax),  pacific  sardine  (Sardinops  caeruleus),  and 
Pacific  hake  (Merluccius  productus).  Six  other  species  were  found  but  not 
specifically  identified  (Fitch  1969b).  Fitch  gave  us  his  material  and  we  have 
incorporated  it  into  this  report.  Most  of  the  Rincon  publications  report  on 
aspects  other  than  faunal  remains.  Evans,  Grossman  and  Toney  (1968:36) 


4 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


mention  fish  remains  but  state  only  that  “The  remains  of  fish,  mainly  verte- 
brae, were  numerous  and  appear  to  represent  shallow  water  species.” 

SPECIES  ACCOUNTS 

It  is  difficult  to  present  the  species  accounts  in  both  an  archaeological  and 
an  ichthyological  approach.  We  have  tried  to  simplify  the  matter  by  separating 
the  elasmobranchs  (Sharks,  skates  and  rays)  from  the  teleosts  (bony  fishes).  In 
each  of  the  two  groups,  taxa  are  arranged  alphabetically  by  family,  and  within 
each  family  by  genus  and  species.  Common  names  are  listed  after  each  scien- 
tific name. 


Elasmobranchs 
Alopiidae  - Thresher  sharks 

Alopias  vulpinus  - Thresher  shark.  — Along  the  west  coast  of  North 
America  the  thresher  shark  ranges  from  central  Baja  California  north  to  the 
Strait  of  Juan  de  Fuca,  but  also  is  found  in  all  warm  seas.  Threshers  are  known 
to  attain  a length  of  at  least  5.5  m (18  feet,  Joseph  1954).  This  shark  lives  near 
the  surface,  probably  not  descending  to  depths  greater  than  200  m;  they  rarely 
are  found  near  shore.  Indians  probably  utilized  a harpoon  in  obtaining  them. 
Thresher  shark  remains  have  been  reported  from  a midden  site  in  Alameda 
County  (Follett  1975a). 

Material:  1 jaw  tooth;  Fig.  IB. 

Carcharhinidae  - Requiem  sharks 

Galeorhinus  zyopterus  - Soupfin  shark.  — Soupfin  sharks  are  large,  attain- 
ing lengths  to  2 m (6.5  feet.  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  They  are  found  off  Chile  and 
Peru  in  the  southern  Hemisphere  and  from  San  Juanico  Bay,  Baja  California, 
to  northern  British  Columbia  in  the  Northern  Hemisphere.  South  of  Point 
Conception  this  shark  often  inhabits  waters  several  hundred  feet  deep  (Fitch 
1968). 

Soupfin  shark  remains  also  have  been  recovered  from  Ventura  (Fitch 
1969a,  1975;  Follett  1965)  and  Los  Angeles  counties  (Follett  1963a;  Frey  1974; 
Tartaglia  1976),  and  at  Point  St.  George  site  (Gould  1966). 

Material:  13  jaw  teeth;  Fig.  II. 

Mustelus  californicus  - Gray  smoothhound.  — Gray  smoothhounds  reach 
lengths  of  just  over  1.5  m (5  feet,  Fitch  1972),  and  range  from  Mazatlan, 
Mexico,  to  Cape  Mendocino,  California.  They  are  common  in  shallow  water 
off  southern  California  where  they  could  have  been  taken  easily  by  gill  nets, 
hook  and  line  or  beach  seines,  by  the  Indians. 

Remains  of  gray  smoothhounds  have  been  reported  from  middens  in  Ven- 
tura (Fitch  1969a),  Orange  (Fitch  1975)  and  San  Diego  Counties  (Follett  1976). 
Material:  2 jaw  teeth;  Fig.  2A. 

Prionace  glauca  - Blue  shark.  — The  blue  shark  ranges  throughout  warm 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


5 


seas.  In  the  eastern  Pacific,  they  are  found  from  Chile  to  the  Gulf  of  Alaska  but 
are  absent  in  the  tropics.  Individuals  off  California  are  usually  shorter  than  1.8 
m (6  feet,  Fitch  1972).  The  Indians  probably  used  harpoon  and  hook  and  line  to 
capture  this  species.  Blue  shark  remains  have  been  recovered  also  from  mid- 
dens in  Los  Angeles  (Follett  1963b),  San  Luis  Obispo  (Fitch  1972),  and  Orange 
Counties  (Fitch  1975). 

Material:  1 jaw  tooth.  Fig.  1H. 

Triakis  semifasciata  - Leopard  shark.  — The  leopard  shark  has  been 
taken  from  Mazatlan,  Mexico,  to  Oregon  and  in  the  Gulf  of  California.  They 
are  common  along  beaches  in  bays  and  attain  lengths  of  2 m (6.5  feet,  Miller 
and  Lea  1972).  The  Indians  could  have  captured  this  shark  by  harpoon,  spear, 
hook  and  line,  traps  or  beach  seines. 

Leopard  shark  remains  have  been  recovered  from  archaeological  sites  in 
Ventura  (Fitch  1969a;  Follet  1933,  1965),  Los  Angeles  (Follett  1963a,  1963b, 
1969),  Orange  (Fitch  1967,  1975;  Follett  1966),  Marin,  Monterey  and  San  Luis 
Obispo  (Follett  1964,  1974,  1972a;  Fitch  1972),  Alameda  and  Contra  Costa 
Counties  (Follett  1975a,  1975b),  and  also  from  Santa  Catalina  Island  (Tartaglia 
1976). 

Material:  3 jaw  teeth,  Fig.  2D. 

Dasyatidae  - Stingrays 

Dasyatis  dipterura  - Diamond  stringray.  — This  large  ray  ranges  from 
Paita,  Peru,  to  Kyuquot,  British  Columbia.  They  are  known  to  attain  a Weight 
of  25  kg.  (1 13-14  pounds.  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  Diamond  stingrays  are  found  in 
shallow  areas  to  depths  of  18  m (55  feet,  Miller  and  Lea  1972)  preferring  regions 
of  sandy  bottom,  where  they  lie  on  the  substrate  and  cover  themselves  with 
sand.  The  Indians  could  have  captured  this  species  with  hook  and  line,  spear  or 
harpoon  while  fishing  in  shallow  nearshore  areas. 

The  diamond  stingray  has  been  reported  from  only  one  other  midden 
(Fitch  1975). 

Material:  4 jaw  teeth.  Fig.  2E. 

Heterodontidae  - Horn  sharks 

Heterodontus  francisci  - Horn  shark.  — This  small  nonagressive  shark  is 
found  in  the  Gulf  of  California  and  along  the  coasts  of  the  Californias  to 
Monterey  Bay,  reaching  a length  of  just  over  one  meter  (3  feet  2-Vs  inches, 
John  Fitch,  personal  communication).  Horn  sharks  are 'most  frequently  found 
in  shallow  water  in  rocky  bottom  habitats,  but  they  may  descend  to  depths  of 
164  m (492  feet.  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  Fitch  (1969a)  suggests  that  horn  sharks 
may  have  been  captured  by  the  Indians  while  free  diving  as  well  as  with  hook 
and  line  and  possibly  with  traps. 

Horn  shark  remains  have  been  recovered  from  Indian  middens  in  Orange 
and  Ventura  Counties  (Fitch  1967,  1969a;  Follett  1933). 

Material:  4 jaw  teeth,  1 dorsal  spine.  Fig.  2F,G,H. 


6 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


Hexanchidae  - Cow  sharks 

Notorynchus  maculatus  - Sevengill  shark.  — Sevengill  sharks  range  in  the 
north  Pacific  from  San  Carlos  Bay,  Baja  California,  to  northern  British  Co- 
lumbia. The  maximum  known  length  is  2.6  m (8  feet-6  inches,  Bohnam  1942). 
These  sharks  commonly  are  found  in  bays,  but  south  of  Point  Conception  they 
usually  inhabit  deeper  waters  of  200  m (600  feet,  Fitch  1969a)  or  more.  The 
Indians  probably  captured  this  species  using  hook  and  line  in  deep  water. 

Remains  of  sevengill  sharks  have  been  found  in  middens  near  Ventura 
(Fitch  1969a,  1975)  and  in  Marin  County  (Follett  1968). 

Material:  1 jaw  tooth,  Fig.  IE. 

Lamnidae  - Mackerel  sharks 

Carcharodon  carcharias  - White  shark.  — The  white  shark  has  a 
worldwide  distribution,  and  is  found  in  the  eastern  Pacific  from  Chile  to 
Alaska.  There  is  an  endemic  population  off  California.  They  probably  are  not 
uncommon  as  reported  in  the  literature  (Bigelow  and  Schroeder  1948;  Miller 
and  Lea  1972).  Whites  are  one  of  the  largest  sharks  attaining  lengths  of  at  least 
6.4  m (21  feet,  Randall  1973).  The  Indians  could  have  captured  this  shark  by 
use  of  a harpoon. 

White  shark  remains  have  been  reported  from  sites  in  Ventura  (Fitch  1975; 
Follett  1933,  1965)  and  Los  Angeles  Counties  (Tartaglia  1976),  and  two  sites  in 
southern  New  England  (Waters  1967). 

Material:  3 jaw  teeth,  Fig.  1 D. 

Is  urns  oxyrinchus  - Shortfin  mako.  — The  shortfin  mako  reportedly  at- 
tains a length  of  3.9  m (13  feet.  Miller  and  Lea  1972)  and  weight  of  454  kg  (1000 
pounds,  Miller  and  Lea  1972),  but  a specimen  measuring  3.5  m (11  feet-5 
inches,  Huddleston  unpublished  data),  harpooned  off  Anacapa  Island  in  Au- 
gust and  weighing  466  Kg  (1030  pounds,  Huddleston  unpublished  data),  ap- 
pears to  be  the  largest  eastern  Pacific  one  (S.P.  Applegate,  personal  communi- 
cation). In  the  eastern  Pacific  the  shortfin  mako  ranges  from  Chile  to  the 
Columbia  River.  The  Indians  probably  caught  this  shark  with  harpoon. 

Remains  of  shortfin  makos  have  been  recovered  previously  from  midden 
sites  in  Ventura  (Fitch  1969a,  1975;  Follett  1933,  1965;  Tartaglia  1976)  and  Los 
Angeles  Counties  (Follett  1963a,  1963b,  1969;  Tartaglia  1976)  and  from  Santa 
Catalina  Island  (Tartaglia  1976). 

Material:  4 jaw  teeth.  Fig.  1A. 

Myliobatidae  - Eagle  rays 

Myliobatis  calif ornica  - Bat  ray.  — Bat  rays  range  from  the  Gulf  of 
California  to  Oregon.  They  have  been  known  to  attain  a width  of  about  1 .4  m (4 
feet-9  inches,  Miller  and  Lea  1972),  and  a weight  of  95  kg  (210  pounds,  Miller 
and  Lea  1972),  but  most  individuals  weigh  less  than  23  kg  (50  pounds,  Fitch 
1969a).  They  have  been  found  from  the  surface  to  depths  of  45  m (150  feet. 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


7 


Miller  and  Lea  1972).  Bat  rays  commonly  are  found  in  bays  and  shallow  water 
over  sandy  or  muddy  bottoms.  Large  individuals  could  have  been  captured  by 
hook  and  line,  and  it  is  possible  that  the  Indians  utilized  the  caudal  stings  of 
these  and  other  rays  for  harpoon  points. 

Bat  ray  remains  have  been  recovered  from  several  other  middens  in  Ven- 
tura (Fitch  1969a,  1975;  Follett  1933,  1965;  Tartaglia  1976),  Los  Angeles  (Fol- 
lett  1963a,  1969;  Frey  1974;  Meighan  1959;  Tartaglia  1976)  Orange  (Follett 
(1966),  Marin  (Follett  1968,  1974),  Santa  Barbara  (Harrington  1928),  San  Luis 
Obispo  Counties  (Fitch  1972). 

Material:  57  jaw  teeth.  Figs.  2J,K. 

Rhinobatidae  - Guitar  fishes 

Rhinobatos  productus  - Shovelnose  guitarfish.  — The  shovelnose  guitar- 
fish  is  found  from  the  Gulf  of  California  to  San  Francisco  Bay,  but  recent 
reports  indicate  that  it  ranges  only  as  far  north  as  Capitola.  This  cartilaginous 
fish  has  been  reported  to  attain  a length  of  about  1.5  m (61 .5  inches,  Miller  and 
Lea  1972).  They  are  found  from  the  surface  to  depths  of  about  13.5  m (45  feet, 
Miller  and  Lea  1972),  preferring  sandy  or  muddy  bottoms.  Sometimes  shovel- 
nose guitarfish  feed  in  such  shallow  water  as  to  be  nearly  beached  by  the 
breaking  surf.  At  such  times  they  are  taken  easily  by  spear  or  hand.  It  is  also 
possible  that  the  Indians  used  hook  and  line. 

Remains  of  the  shovelnose  guitarfish  have  been  recovered  from  other 
midden  sites  in  Ventura  (Fitch  1969a;  Follett  1933;  Tartaglia  1976),  Orange 
(Fitch  1967,  1975),  and  Los  Angeles  Counties  (Follett  1963a,  1963b;  Tartaglia 
1976)  and  Santa  Catalina  Island  (Tartaglia  1976). 

Material:  1 jaw  tooth.  Fig.  2C. 

Scyliorhinidae  - Cat  sharks 

Cephaloscyllium  ventriosum  - Swell  sharks.  — Swell  sharks  are  found 
from  Chile  to  Monterey  Bay,  including  Guadalupe  Island  and  the  Gulf  of 
California.  This  shark  is  very  abundant  around  islands  south  of  Monterey  Bay, 
but  not  those  south  of  Magdalena  Bay.  Swell  sharks  prefer  rocky  kelp  bed 
habitat  from  shallow  water  to  depths  of  over  400  m (1380  feet,  Miller  and  Lea 
1972);  they  attain  lengths  of  about  one  meter  (3  feet,  Miller  and  Lea  1972). 
When  caught  or  threatened  they  have  the  ability  to  inflate  their  stomachs  with 
air  — a possible  defensive  mechanism.  The  Indians  probably  captured  this 
shark  using  traps  in  shallow  rocky  areas,  although  some  could  have  been  taken 
by  hook  and  line.  Swell  sharks  are  reported  to  be  of  very  poor  flavor  and  the 
Indians  probably  did  not  actively  fish  for  them  (S.P.  Applegate,  personal 
communication). 

Swell  shark  remains  also  have  been  recovered  from  a midden  in  Ventura 
County  (Fitch  1969a). 

Material:  4 jaw  teeth,  Fig.  1 F. 


8 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


Squalidae  - Dogfish  sharks 

Squalas  acanthias  - Spiny  dogfish.  — The  spiny  dogfish  has  been  found  in 
the  temperate  and  subarctic  regions  of  both  the  Atlantic  and  Pacific  Oceans.  In 
the  eastern  Pacific,  this  shark  has  been  found  off  Chile  and  from  Sebastian 
Viscaino  Bay,  Baja  California,  to  Alaska.  They  reach  lengths  of  130  cm  (4  feet 
3 inches,  Bonham,  Sanford,  Clegg  and  Bucher  1949),  and  occasionally  travel  in 
schools  in  those  waters  above  390  m (1200  feet,  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  Off 
California  they  usually  are  found  in  depths  between  33  and  66  m (100-250  feet, 
Fitch  1969a).  The  Indians  could  have  utilized  hook  and  line  as  well  as  gill  nets 
to  capture  this  species. 

Spiny  dogfish  remains  have  been  recovered  also  from  Indian  middens  in 
Ventura  and  San  Luis  Obispo  (Fitch  1969a,  1972),  and  Los  Angeles  Counties 
(Tartaglia  1976).  This  species  has  also  been  noted  from  midden  sites  in  British 
Columbia,  Canada  (Niblack  1890;  Stwart  ms). 

Material:  25  jaw  teeth.  Fig.  1G. 

Squatinidae  - Angel  sharks 

Squatina  californica  - Pacific  angel  shark.  — The  Pacific  angel  shark  is 
found  off  Chile  and  from  the  Gulf  of  California  to  southeastern  Alaska,  but  is 
not  common  north  of  Point  Conception  and  has  not  been  reported  from  Canada 
(Hart  1973).  This  shark  has  been  known  to  reach  a length  of  1.8  m (5  feet, 
Miller  and  Lea  1972)  and  a weight  of  27  kg  (60  pounds,  Miller  and  Lea  1972). 
Pacific  angel  sharks  prefer  shallow  water,  dwelling  on  the  bottom  in  sandy  or 
muddy  areas.  They  have  been  observed  from  depths  between  about  3 to  45  m 
(8  to  150  feet,  Fitch  1969a),  but  prefer  a depth  of  about  20  m.  Although  the 
Indians  could  have  used  a beach  seine  to  capture  this  species  they  probably 
captured  them  on  hook  and  line  or  by  harpoon. 

Remains  of  the  Pacific  angel  shark  have  been  recovered  from  middens  in 
Los  Angeles  (Follett  1963a,  1963b,  1969;  Frey  1974;  Tartaglia  1976),  Ventura 
(Fitch  1969a,  1975;  Follett  1965;  Tartaglia  1976),  Orange  (Fitch  1967),  and  San 
Luis  Obispo  Counties  (Fitch  1969a). 

Material:  9 jaw  teeth,  365  dermal  denticles.  Fig.  1C. 

Unidentified  elasmobranch  remains 

Three  fragments  of  caudal  stings  were  recovered  from  SBa-1.  Unfortu- 
nately cuadal  stings  generally  are  not  useful  for  making  specific  identifications 
because  of  their  similarity.  Two  fragments  of  large  caudal  stings  were  recov- 
ered from  the  road  level  sample  near  the  area  where  most  of  the  Myliobatis 
californica  teeth  were  recovered  (Fig.  21,  one  only).  However,  they  were  not 
associated  with  this  material  and  it  is  possible  that  they  belong  to  Dasyatis 
dipterura , which  has  a similar  type  of  caudal  sting.  The  third  smallest  fragment 
was  found  in  one  of  the  hill  samples  and  although  it  could  have  been  from  a 
small  Myliobatis  californica  it  possibly  was  from  Urolophus  halleri,  the  round 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


9 


stingray.  Both  species  are  extremely  abundant  off  southern  California  in  shal- 
low sandy  regions,  but  because  of  its  small  size  and  fragmented  nature  the  sting 
cannot  reliably  be  assigned  to  either  ray. 

Material:  3 caudal  stings.  Fig.  21. 


Teleosts 

Atherinidae  - Silversides 

Atherinops  affinis  - Topsmelt.  — Topsmelt  range  from  Santa  Maria  Bay, 
Baja  California,  to  Vancouver  Island,  British  Columbia,  and  attain  a length  to 
365  mm  (Schultz  1933).  Topsmelt  inhabit  bays  and  kelp  beds  living  at  or  near 
the  surface.  They  possess  small  mouths  and  thus  would  have  been  difficult  to 
take  by  hook  and  line.  The  Indians  probably  used  beach  seines  to  obtain  this 
species. 

Fitch  (1969a,  1972)  reported  otoliths  A.  affinis  from  sites  in  Ventura  and 
San  Luis  Obispo  Counties. 

Material:  7 otoliths.  Fig.  3 A. 

Atherinopsis  californiensis  - Jacksmelt.  — Jacksmelt  are  known  from 
Santa  Maria  Bay,  Baja  California,  to  Yaquina  Bay,  Oregon.  Although  reported 
to  reach  a length  of  22  inches,  the  largest  measured  individual  was  448  mm 
{\1V2  inches,  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  Jacksmelt  are  common  along  coasts,  bays 
and  kelp  beds.  Beach  seines  probably  were  used  to  obtain  this  species. 

An  otolith  of  A.  californiensis  has  been  reported  from  a midden  near 
Ventura  (Fitch  1969a);  it  also  has  been  reported  from  Marin  (Follett  1974),  San 
Diego  (Follett  1976)  and  Alameda  Counties  (Follett  1975a). 

Material:  3 otoliths.  Not  figured. 

Batrachoididae  - Toadfishes 

Porichthys  notatus  - Plainfin  midshipman.  — Plainfin  midshipmen  have 
been  found  in  the  Gulf  of  California  and  range  from  Gorda  Bank,  Baja  Califor- 
nia, to  Sitka,  Alaska.  They  are  found  near  the  surface  and  to  depths  of  about 
330  m (1000  feet.  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  South  of  Point  Conception  they  usually 
are  confined  to  deeper  waters  (Hubbs  and  Schultz  1939).  However,  during 
“nesting”  season  it  is  possible  to  capture  juveniles  as  well  as  adults  from  under 
rocks  by  hand  in  the  intertidal.  Plainfin  midshipmen  spend  daylight  hours 
burrowed  in  the  bottom  sediments,  emerging  at  night  to  seek  food.  The  single 
otolith  recovered  from  SBa-1  was  that  of  a juvenile  and  showed  signs  of  diges- 
tive wear;  it  probably  was  from  the  stomach  of  a predator  captured  by  the 
Indians. 

Remains  oiP.  notatus  have  been  reported  from  middens  in  Ventura  (Fitch 
1969a),  San  Luis  Obispo  (Fitch  1972),  Los  Angeles  (Fitch  1975)  and  Alameda 
Counties  (Follett  1975a). 

Material;  1 otolith.  Fig.  3C. 


10 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


Bothidae  - Lefteyed  flounders 

Paralichthys  californicus  - California  halibut.  — California  halibut  are 
found  from  Magdalena  Bay,  Baja  California,  to  Quillayute  River,  British  Co- 
lumbia, and  an  isolated  population  occurs  in  the  Gulf  of  California.  They  have 
been  known  to  reach  a length  of  1 .8  m (5  feet,  Fitch  1969a),  and  a weight  of  33 
kg  (72  pounds,  Fitch  1969a).  They  are  uncommon  north  of  Morro  Bay. 
California  halibut  usually  are  found  in  shallow  water  at  depths  of  less  than  36  m 
preferring  sandy  habitat.  During  the  spawning  season  (from  February  through 
July)  they  frequent  shallower  water  where  they  could  have  been  captured 
easily  by  hook  and  line  and  beach  seines. 

Remains  of  California  halibut  have  been  reported  from  middens  in  Los 
Angeles  (Follett  1963b,  1969;  Tartaglia  1976),  Orange  (Follett  1966),  and  Ven- 
tura Counties  (Fitch  1969a,  1975;  Follett  1933;  Tartaglia  1976),  and  from  mid- 
den sites  along  the  coast  of  British  Columbia  (Boas  1895,  1916;  Niblack  1890; 
Leechman  1973;  Ducker  1955,  1965;  Sapir  1915;  Garfield  1939,  1966;  Stewart 
ms). 

Material:  1 Premaxillary.  Fig.  6F. 

Carangidae  - Jacks  and  pompanos 

Seriola  dorsalis  - Yellowtail.  — The  schooling  yellowtail  range  from  Chile 
to  southern  Washington  and  also  are  found  in  the  Gulf  of  California.  They 
attain  a length  of  1.8  m (5  feet.  Miller  and  Lea  1972)  and  a weight  of  36  kg  (80 
pounds,  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  Generally  they  live  near  the  surface  but  may 
descend  to  24  m.  The  Indians  probably  captured  this  species  by  hook  and  line 
in  offshore  areas. 

Yellowtail  remains  have  been  reported  from  middens  in  Los  Angeles  (Fol- 
lett 1963a,  1963b,  1969;  Tartaglia  1976)  and  Ventura  Counties  (Tartaglia  1976). 
Material:  1 vertebra.  Not  figured. 

Trachurus  symmetricus  - Jack  mackerel.  — Jack  mackerel,  a schooling 
species,  are  known  from  Magdalena  Bay,  Baja  California,  to  southeastern 
Alaska,  and  from  offshore  to  several  hundred  kilometers.  They  sometimes  are 
found  inshore  around  rocky  headlands.  Fitch  (1972)  reported  that  a 5.25  pound 
(2.4  kg)  jack  mackerel  measured  28.5  inches  (724  mm)  in  total  length  and 
possessed  otoliths  11.4  mm  in  length.  Trachurus  symmetricus  is  reported  to 
reach  a length  of  just  under  one  meter  (32  inches,  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  They 
live  in  the  upper  45  m.  The  Indians  probably  captured  this  species  with  hook 
and  line  or  gill  nets. 

Jack  mackerel  remains  also  have  been  reported  in  midden  sites  in  Ventura 
(Fitch  1969a),  San  Diego  (Fitch  1969b),  San  Luis  Obispo  (Fitch  1972)  and  Los 
Angeles  Counties  (Tartaglia  1976). 

Material:  1 otolith.  Not  figured. 

Clinidae  - Kelpfishes 

Neoclinus  uninotatus  - Onespot  fringehead.  — Onespot  fringeheads  are 
known  only  from  Ensenada,  Baja  California,  to  Bodega  Bay,  a restricted  geo- 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


11 


graphic  distribution.  They  are  a nearshore  species  occurring  in  waters  3 to  27  m 
(10-90  feet,  Miller  and  Lea  1972)  deep,  and  reach  lengths  to  247  mm  (9  inches, 
Miller  and  Lea  1972).  The  eroded  condition  of  the  otolith  recovered  from 
SBa-1  indicated  that  it  probably  had  passed  through  the  digestive  system  of  a 
predator  captured  by  the  Indians.  The  otolith  is  from  a specimen  too  small  to 
have  been  captured  by  the  gill  nets  used  for  white  croakers,  although  many  are 
taken  by  hook  and  line. 

N.  uninotatus  remains  have  not  been  reported  from  any  other  midden. 
Material:  1 otolith.  Fig.  3B. 


Clupeidae  - Herrings 

Sardinops  caeruleus  - Pacific  sardine.  — Pacific  sardines  are  schooling 
fish  with  a broad  distribution  in  the  eastern  Pacific  from  Guay  mas,  Mexico,  to 
Kamchatka.  They  have  been  known  to  reach  lengths  of  about  39.4  cm  (approx- 
imately 16  inches,  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  Scales  of  S.  caeruleus  are  distinctive 
among  the  clupeids.  The  transverse  slits  and  perforations  in  the  scale  are 
distinctive  for  identification.  Scales  of  S.  caeruleus  were  exceedingly  abundant 
throughout  the  samples  examined  with  the  exception  of  those  from  the  slope  of 
Rincon  Hill.  This  species  was  probably  captured  by  beach  seines  or  gill  nets. 
Follett  (1965,  1968,  1969,  1972a,  1976)  reported  remains  of  S.  caeruleus  (as  S. 
sagax)  from  the  Conejo  Rock  Shelter,  Tomales  Bay  site,  Century  Ranch  site, 
Mission  La  Soledad  cemetery  and  a site  at  Rancho  Carrillo,  Ventura,  Marin, 
Los  Angeles,  Monterey,  and  San  Diego  Counties;  Fitch  (1972,  1975)  noted 
their  remains  at  sites  in  San  Luis  Obispo  and  Ventura  Counties. 

Material:  3 otoliths.  Fig.  3D. 

Embiotocidae  - Surfperches 

Amphistichus  argenteus  - Barred  surfperch.  — Barred  surfperch  range 
from  Playa  Maria  Bay,  Baja  California,  to  Bodega  Bay,  attaining  lengths  to  43 
cm  (17  inches,  Fitch  1969a)  and  a weight  of  two  kg  (4.5  pounds,  Fitch  1969a). 
This  species  is  most  abundant  in  breaking  surf  and  other  shallow  waters,  par- 
ticularly sandy  bottom  areas;  they  rarely  are  captured  in  rocky  areas.  Barred 
surfperch  have  been  captured  at  the  surface  to  depths  of  73  m (240  feet,  Miller 
and  Lea  1972).  This  species  probably  was  captured  by  beach  seines,  although 
large  individuals  could  have  been  taken  by  hook  and  line. 

Barred  surfperch  remains  also  have  been  recovered  from  midden  sites  in 
Orange  (Fitch  1967),  Ventura  (Fitch  1969a,  1975;  Tartaglia  1976;  Follett  1933) 
and  Los  Angeles  Counties  (Tartaglia  1976). 

Material:  1 jaw  tooth.  Fig.  5 A. 

Cymatogaster  aggregata  - Shiner  surfperch.  — - The  shiner  surfperch  is  a 
small  fish;  most  individuals  are  shorter  than  177  mm.  They  range  from  San 
Quintin  Bay,  Baja  California,  to  Port  Wrangell,  Alaska,  and  have  been  taken 
from  the  surface  to  depths  of  about  136  m (480  feet,  Miller  and  Lea  1972). 
Shiner  surfperch  usually  prefer  water  shallower  than  18  m.  This  species,  which 


12 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


does  not  exceed  100  g i}A  pounds,  Fitch  1972)  in  weight,  probably  was  captured 
by  the  Indians  using  beach  seines. 

Fitch  (1972),  reported  shiner  surfperch  otoliths  from  a midden  site  at  Di- 
ablo Cove,  San  Luis  Obispo  County. 

Material:  2 otoliths.  Fig.  3G. 

Damalichthys  vacca  - Pile  perch.  — The  pile  perch  has  been  taken  from 
Guadalupe  Island  to  Port  Wrangell,  Alaska.  They  are  recorded  from  surface 
waters  to  depths  of  45  m (140  feet,  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  A record-sized 
specimen  measured  44.2  cm  (17.4  inches,  Fitch  1969a)  and  weighed  slightly 
less  than  1 .8  kg  (4  pounds,  Fitch  1969a).  The  pile  perch  is  found  over  sandy  and 
rocky  bottom  habitat  as  well  as  around  kelp  beds.  The  Indians  probably  cap- 
tured pile  perch  using  hook  and  line  and  possibly  gill  nets  and  beach  seines. 

Follett  (1964)  found  pile  perch  remains  from  the  Drakes  Bay  site  and  Fitch 
(1969a,  1972)  reported  their  remains  from  Ventura  and  San  Luis  Obispo  Coun- 
ties. They  also  have  been  reported  from  midden  sites  in  Marin  (Follett  1967), 
Monterey  (Follett  1973),  Ventura  and  Los  Angeles  Counties  (Tartaglia  1976). 
Material:  2 pharyngeal  bones,  58  pharyngeal  teeth.  Fig.  5B,E. 

Hyperprosopon  argenteum  - Walleye  surfperch.  — This  surfperch  ranges 
from  Point  Rosarito,  Baja  California,  to  Vancouver  Island,  British  Columbia, 
including  Guadalupe  Island.  They  have  a recorded  size  to  30.5  cm  (12  inches. 
Miller  and  Lea  1972).  A 27.3  cm  (10-%  inch,  Fitch  1969a)  fish  weighed  just  over 
397  g (14  ounces,  Fitch  1969a).  The  walleye  surfperch  has  been  known  from 
surface  waters  to  a depth  of  18  m (60  feet,  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  They  prefer 
sandy  bottom  or  flat  rocky  habitat.  This  species  probably  was  captured  by  the 
Indians  using  beach  seines. 

Walleye  surfperch  remains  have  been  recovered  from  middens  in  Ventura 
and  San  Luis  Obispo  Counties  and  Drakes  Bay  (Fitch  1969a,  1972;  Follett 
1964). 

Material:  2 otoliths.  Fig.  31. 

Phanerodon  furcatus  - White  seaperch.  — White  seaperch  have  been 
captured  from  Point  Cabras,  Baja  California,  to  Vancouver  Island,  British 
Columbia.  They  have  been  known  from  the  surface  to  depths  of  42.4  meters 
(140  feet,  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  This  species  travels  in  loose  schools  over 
sandy  bottoms.  A record-sized  specimen  weighed  about  369  grams  (13  ounces, 
Fitch  1969a).  The  Indians  probably  captured  this  species  using  beach  seines 
near  shore  and  gill  nets  in  deeper  waters. 

Previously  white  seaperch  have  been  recovered  from  a midden  in  Ventura 
County  (Fitch  1969a). 

Material:  5 otoliths-.  Fig.  3H. 

Embiotocids  — (genus  and  species  undetermined).  — Of  the  19  species  of 
surfperches  that  are  found  in  marine  waters  off  California,  17  occur  off  south- 
ern California.  Of  these,  one  is  found  only  around  islands,  thus  there  are  16 
possible  marine  species  that  could  have  been  captured  by  the  inhabitants  of 
SBa-1.  It  is  possible  that  some  of  the  227  unidentified  pharyngeal  teeth  be- 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


13 


longed  to  some  of  the  other  species  not  listed  above  or  from  freshwater 
sources. 

Material:  227  pharyngeal  teeth.  Not  figured. 

Engraulidae  - Anchovies 

Engraulis  mordax  - Northern  anchovy.  — The  northern  anchovy  is  one  of 
the  most  abundant  fishes  off  our  coast.  This  schooling  fish  has  been  found  from 
Cape  San  Lucas,  Baja  California,  to  Queen  Charlotte  Island,  British  Colum- 
bia. They  are  known  to  attain  a length  of  229  mm  (9  inches,  Miller  and  Lea 
1972)  but  specimens  over  177  mm  are  rare.  During  fall  and  winter,  northern 
achovies  apparently  move  offshore  and  return  inshore  during  spring  (Baxter 
1966).  During  the  day,  anchovies  remain  well  below  the  surface,  rising  to  the 
surface  at  night.  They  are  consumed  by  nearly  all  predatory  fishes  off  Califor- 
nia as  well  as  by  birds  and  marine  mammals.  The  Indians  could  have  caught  E. 
mordax  by  beach  seine,  although  some  of  the  otoliths  show  signs  of  digestive 
wear  and  were  probably  from  stomachs  of  predators  captured  by  the  Indians. 

Northern  anchovy  remains  have  been  reported  from  midden  sites  in 
Orange  (Fitch  1967),  Ventura  (Fitch  1969a,  1975)  and  Los  Angeles  Counties 
(Fitch  1975;  Tartaglia  1976).  Fitch  (1969b)  previously  reported  otoliths  of  E. 
mordax  from  SBa-1. 

Material:  148  otoliths.  Fig.  3E. 

Labridae  - Wrasses 

Oxjulis  californica  - Senorita.  — This  small  wrasse  has  been  taken  from 
Cedros  Island,  Baja  California,  to  Sausalito,  California.  Ranging  from  surface 
waters  to  depths  of  54.5  m (180  feet,  Miller  and  Lea  1972),  senorita  prefer 
shallow  water  rocky  habitat  with  kelp  vegetation.  A 229  mm  (9-inch,  Fitch 
1968)  individual  weighed  113  g (4  ounces,  Fitch  1968).  The  Indians  probably 
caught  this  species  with  gill  nets. 

O.  californica  remains  have  been  reported  from  midden  sites  in  San  Luis 
Obispo  (Fitch  1972),  Ventura  and  Los  Angeles  Counties  (Tartaglia  1976). 
Material:  2 otoliths,  7 premaxillary  bones,  26  pharyngeal  bones.  Figs.  3F;  5A; 
6C. 

Pimelometopon  pulchrum  - California  sheephead.  — California 
sheephead  range  from  Cape  San  Lucas,  Baja  California,  to  Monterey,  with  an 
isolated  population  in  the  northern  Gulf  of  California.  Although  abundant  in 
southern  California  waters,  it  is  not  common  north  of  Point  Conception.  This 
fish  is  abundant  in  thick  kelp  beds  and  slightly  rocky  habitat.  They  are  known 
to  reach  a length  just  under  one  meter  (3  feet,  Miller  and  Lea  1972)  and  a weight 
of  16.5  kg  (36.25  pounds,  Fitch  1968).  The  Indians  could  have  captured 
California  sheephead  by  hook  and  line,  in  traps,  or  by  free  diving,  especially  on 
offshore  islands. 

California  sheephead  remains  also  have  been  recovered  from  many  other 
midden  sites:  Arroyo  Grande,  Point  Mugu,  Arroyo  Sequit,  Century  Ranch,  La 


14 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


Jolla,  Santa  Catalina  Island  and  San  Pedro  (Wallace  1962;  Follett  1933;  Mitch- 
ell 1959;  Follett  1963a,  1963b;  Shumway,  Hubbs  and  Moriarty  1961;  Meighan 
and  Eberhart  1953;  Meighan  1959;  Frey  1974),  and  from  Orange  (Fitch  1967), 
Ventura  (Fitch  1969a;  Tartaglia  1976)  and  Los  Angeles  Counties  (Tartaglia 
1976). 

Material:  1 jaw  tooth.  Fig.  5C. 

Merlucciidae  - Hakes 

Merluccius  productus  - Pacific  hake.  — The  Pacific  hake  ranges  from 
Magdalena  Bay,  Baja  California,  to  Alaska  and  along  the  Asiatic  coast;  there  is 
an  isolated  population  in  the  Gulf  of  California.  They  have  been  known  to 
reach  a length  of  nearly  one  meter  (3  feet,  Fitch  1972)  and  a weight  of  3.6  to  4.5 
kg  (8  to  10  pounds,  Fitch  1972).  Although  found  from  the  surface  to  depths  of 
1000  m (3000  feet,  Miller  and  Lea  1972),  most  individuals  off  California  inhabit 
waters  shallower  than  270  m (750  feet,  Fitch  1972).  The  Pacific  hake  is  a 
schooling  fish  that  moves  inshore  and  offshore  much  the  same  as  the  northern 
anchovy,  and  is  preyed  upon  heavily  by  marine  mammals.  No  Pacific  hake 
remains  were  recovered  from  the  samples  examined  by  us,  but  Fitch  (1969b) 
reported  jaw  fragments  and  vertebrae  of  Pacific  hake  from  a sample  (general 
sample)  he  examined  from  the  slope  region  of  Rincon  Hill. 

Pacific  hake  remains  have  been  recovered  from  Indian  midden  sites  in 
Ventura  and  San  Luis  Obispo  Counties  and  at  Tomales  Bay  and  Point  St. 
George  (Fitch  1969a,  1969b,  1972;  Follett  1968;  and  Gould  1966). 

Material:  Jaws,  vertebrae.  Not  figured. 

Sciaenidae  - Croakers 

Cy noscion  nobilis  - White  seabass.  — White  seabass  are  found  from  Mag- 
delena  Bay,  Baja  California,  to  Juneau,  Alaska,  with  an  isolated  population  in 
the  northern  Gulf  of  California.  Although  reported  to  grow  as  large  as  41  kg  (90 
pounds.  Miller  and  Lea  1972),  a 38  kg  (83.75  pound,  Fitch  and  Lavenberg  1971) 
individual  is  recognized  as  the  world  record.  The  white  seabass  prefers  depths 
of  21  to  45  m (75  to  150  feet,  Fitch  and  Lavenberg  1971)  but  has  been  taken 
from  surface  waters  to  depths  of  121  m (400  feet,  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  Al- 
though large  adults  have  few  natural  enemies,  the  largest  of  the  two  sagittae 
that  we  recovered  at  SBa-1  was  eroded,  indicative  of  digestive  wear  possibly 
due  to  consumption  by  a large  predator.  Otoliths  of  C.  nobilis  have  been  used 
by  California’s  Indians  for  necklace  ornaments  (Fig.  7).  The  Chumash  proba- 
bly caught  white  seabass  on  hook  and  line  while  fishing  just  offshore. 

C.  nobilis  remains  have  been  found  at  Malaga  Cove  and  Santa  Catalina 
Island  (Walker  1951;  Meighan  1959),  Arroyo  Sequit  and  Century  Ranch  sites 
(Follett  1963a,  1963b;  Mitchell  1959),  Ventura  (Fitch  1969a,  1975;  Tartaglia 
1976),  San  Nicolas  Island  (Charles  Rozaire,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los 
Angeles  County,  personal  communication),  Marin  (Follett  1974),  Contra 
Costa  (Follett  1975b)  and  Los  Angeles  Counties  (Tartaglia  1976),  and  a midden 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


15 


site  at  Punta  Pequena,  San  Juanico  Bay,  Baja  California  (Huddleston,  unpub- 
lished data). 

Material:  2 otoliths.  Figs.  4 A,  B. 

Genyonemus  line  at  us  - White  croaker.  — White  croakers  attain  lengths  to 
412  mm  (15.4  inches,  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  They  have  been  found  from  Mag- 
dalena Bay,  Baja  California,  to  Vancouver  Island,  British  Columbia,  but  are 
not  common  north  of  San  Francisco  Bay.  White  croakers  prefer  sandy  or 
muddy  bottom  habitat  and  frequently  are  taken  in  shallow  waters,  although 
they  have  been  known  from  depths  of  188  m (330  feet.  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  A 
random  sample  of  100  G.  lineatus  otoliths  from  SBa-1  ranged  in  size  from  7.0  to 
12.5  mm  representing  fish  from  152  to  266  mm  in  length.  This  narrow  size  range 
indicates  a selective  method  of  fishing,  probably  the  use  of  gill  nets. 

Remains  of  G.  lineatus  were  reported  previously  from  SBa-1  and  near 
Ventura  (Fitch  1969b,  1969a,  1975),  Conejo  Rock  shelter  and  a site  near  La 
Jolla  (Follett  1965;  Shumway  et  al.  1961),  San  Diego  County  (Follett  1976)  and 
from  a site  in  San  Pedro  (Frey  1974). 

Material:  932  otoliths.  Fig.  4C. 

Seriphus  politus  - Queenfish.  — This  fish  is  found  from  west  of  Uncle 
Sam  Bank,  Baja  California,  to  Yaquina  Bay  Oregon,  but  is  rare  north  of  Mon- 
terey. Queenfish  attain  lengths  of  305  mm  (12  inches  Fitch  1972)  and  a weight 
just  over  284  g (10  ounces,  Fitch  1972).  They  prefer  much  the  same  habitat  as 
the  white  croaker,  and  most  of  the  individuals  probably  were  captured  in  gill 
nets  along  with  the  white  croakers.  Queenfish  are  not  taken  as  easily  by  hook 
and  line  as  white  croakers,  but  it  is  possible  that  some  were  captured  that  way. 

Fitch  (1969a,  1972,  1975)  reported  S.  politus  otoliths  from  sites  in  Ventura 
and  San  Luis  Obispo  Counties. 

Material:  42  otoliths.  Fig.  4D. 

Scombridae  - Mackerels  and  Tunas 

Pneumatophorus  japonicus  - Pacific  mackerel.  — This  transpacific 
species  is  found  in  the  eastern  Pacific  from  Chile  to  the  Gulf  of  Alaska.  Attain- 
ing a length  of  635  mm  (25  inches,  Miller  and  Lea  1972)  and  a weight  of  2.9  kg 
(6-16  pounds,  Miller  and  Lea  1972),  this  schooling  species  is  found  from  the 
surface  to  depths  of  45.5  m (150  feet,  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  The  Pacific  mac- 
kerel, like  the  bonito,  will  take  nearly  any  bait,  and  the  Indians  probably 
captured  them  by  the  use  of  hook  and  line. 

Follett  (1963a,  1963b,  1965)  reported  Pacific  mackerel  remains  from  two 
sites  in  Los  Angeles  County  and  from  the  Conejo  Rock  Shelter  in  Ventura 
County.  Fitch  (1969a,  1975)  reported  their  remains  from  midden  sites  near 
Ventura,  and  Follett  (1976)  reported  their  occurrence  from  a site  in  San  Diego 
County.  They  have  also  been  reported  from  a midden  site  at  Cape  Brinera 
(Sidimi)  USSR  (Besednov  1973). 

Material:  4 otoliths.  Figs.  4E.;  6 A. 

Sarda  chiliensis  - Pacific  bonito.  — - The  schooling  Pacific  bonito  ranges 


16 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


from  Chile  to  the  Gulf  of  Alaska  but  is  absent  in  tropical  waters  and  uncommon 
north  of  Point  Conception.  They  have  been  reported  to  attain  a length  of  just 
over  one  meter  (40  inches.  Miller  and  Lea  1972).  A 686-mm  (27  inches,  Fitch 
1969a)  specimen  weighed  4.8  kg  (\O-V2  pounds,  Fitch  1969a).  This  fish  usually 
travels  at  or  near  the  surface  and  will  take  nearly  any  bait.  The  Indians  proba- 
bly captured  Pacific  bonito  with  hook  and  line.  Follett  (1933,  1963a,  1963b) 
reported  Pacific  bonito  remains  from  two  middens  in  Los  Angeles  County  and 
from  one  in  Ventura  County.  Fitch  (1969a)  noted  their  remains  from  a Ventura 
County  midden  and  Tartaglia  (1976)  noted  them  from  sites  in  Ventura  and  Los 
Angeles  Counties. 

Material:  33  dentaries.  Fig.  6B. 

Scorpaenidae  - Rockfishes 

Sebastes  atrovirens  - Kelp  rockfish.  — The  kelp  rockfish  ranges  from  Pt. 
San  Pablo,  Baja  California,  to  Timber  Cove,  Sonoma  County.  They  have  been 
known  to  attain  a length  of  425  mm  (16-3A  inches,  Fitch  1969a)  and  a weight  of 
just  over  1.4  kg  (3  pounds,  Fitch  1969a).  Kelp  rockfish  inhabit  depths  from 
subtidal  to  45.5  m (25  fathoms,  Phillips  1957)  but  are  most  abundant  at  about  10 
m or  less.  The  inhabitants  of  SBa-1  probably  caught  kelp  rockfish  by  hook  and 
line  in  shallow  water  just  offshore  or  in  traps. 

Remains  of  S.  atrovirens  also  have  been  reported  from  a midden  in  San 
Luis  Obispo  County  (Fitch  1972). 

Material:  1 otolith.  Fig.  4F. 

Sebastes  diploproa  - Splitnose  rockfish.  — This  deep-living  rockfish 
ranges  from  north  of  San  Martin  Island,  Baja  California,  to  Prince  William 
Sound,  Alaska.  They  are  known  to  reach  a length  of  457  mm  (18  inches,  Miller 
and  Lea  1972)  and  a depth  of  473  m (250  fathoms,  Phillips  1957).  The  single 
broken  otolith  recovered  from  SBa-1  showed  little  digestive  wear.  Because  this 
species  has  not  been  known  to  come  nearer  the  surface  than  212  m (700  feet, 
Miller  and  Lea  1972)  it  may  not  have  been  captured  directly  by  the  Indians.  We 
suspect  that  it  was  derived  from  the  digestive  system  of  a deep-feeding  pre- 
dator such  as  a marine  mammal,  which  was  captured  by  the  Indians. 

Remains  of  S.  diploproa  have  not  been  reported  from  any  other  midden. 
Material:  1 otolith.  Fig.  4H. 

Sebastes  goodei  - Chilipepper.  — S.  goodei  have  been  captured  from 
Magdalena  Bay,  Baja  California,  to  near  Cape  Scott  on  the  northwest  coast  of 
Vancouver  Island,  British  Columbia.  They  range  from  the  surface  to  great 
depths.  The  deepest  recorded  specimen  was  taken  at  327  m (1080  feet,  Miller 
and  Lea  1972);  the  largest  specimen  captured  measured  559  mm  (22  inches, 
Phillips  1957).  Chilipeppers  frequently  are  captured  by  sport  fishermen,  but 
only  from  skiffs  or  boats  anchored  or  drifting  over  deep  rocky  habitat.  Al- 
though young  individuals  usually  remain  in  shallow  water,  all  of  the  otoliths  we 
recovered  at  SBa-1  were  from  adult  fish.  The  Indians  probably  captured  this 
fish  by  hook  and  line  while  fishing  in  deep  water. 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


17 


Follett  (1963a)  reported  S.  goodei  from  a midden  in  Los  Angeles  County. 
Material:  9 otoliths.  Fig.  4G. 

Sebastes  miniatus  - Vermilion  rockfish.  — Ranging  from  San  Bonito  Is- 
land, Baja  California,  to  Vancouver  Island,  British  Columbia,  this  rockfish  has 
been  captured  at  a depth  of  200  m (1 10  fathoms,  Phillips  1957);  juveniles  prefer 
shallow  water.  Vermilion  rockfish  attain  lengths  of  762  mm  (30  inches,  Phillips 
1957).  The  Indians  probably  caught  this  species  while  fishing  with  hook  and 
line  in  intermediate  depths.  Remains  of  vermilion  rockfish  have  been  recov- 
ered from  Indian  middens  at  Pt.  St.  George  and  Scripps  Estate  (Gould  1966; 
Shumway  et  al.  1961). 

Material:  2 otoliths.  Fig.  41. 

Sebastes  spp.  - (Species  undetermined).  — At  least  58  species  of 
rockfishes  (genus  Sebastes ) inhabit  waters  off  California.  Some  of  the  frag- 
mented Sebastes  otoliths  we  recovered  from  SBa-1  probably  belonged  to  one 
or  more  of  these  species. 


Serranidae  - Sea  basses 

Stereolepis  gigas  - Giant  sea  bass.  — Sometimes  placed  in  the  family 
Percichthyidae  (temperate  basses),  the  giant  sea  bass  has  been  taken  from  the 
Gulf  of  California  to  Humbolt  Bay,  but  is  not  abundant  north  of  the  Channel 
Islands  off  southern  California.  A record  specimen  weighing  252  kg  (557 
pounds,  Fitch  and  Lavenberg  1971)  was  caught  in  1962.  An  individual  weighing 
197  kg  (435  pounds,  Fitch  and  Lavenberg  1971)  was  found  to  be  72  to  75  years 
old  (Fitch  and  Lavenberg  1971).  Large  individuals  prefer  rocky  bottom  habitat 
and  depths  of  35  to  46  m,  just  outside  kelp  beds.  During  the  spawning  period, 
which  is  from  June  to  September,  large  individuals  are  relatively  abundant  in 
shallow  waters  where  they  can  be  taken  easily  with  hook  and  line. 

Fitch  (1969a)  reported  branchiostegal  rays  of  S.  gigas  from  a midden  near 
Ventura. 

Material:  1 vertebra.  Fig.  51. 

Sphyraenidae  - Barracudas 

Sphyraena  argentea  - Pacific  barracuda.  — Ranging  from  Cape  San 
Lucas,  Baja  California,  to  Kodiak  Island,  Alaska,  the  Pacific  barracuda 
reaches  a length  of  1 .2  m (46-Ji  inches,  Fitch  and  Lavenberg  1971)  and  a weight 
of  7.7  kg  (18  pounds  3 ounces,  Fitch  and  Lavenberg  1971).  There  is  an  un- 
verified record  of  1.5  m.  Most  common  south  of  Morro  Bay,  this  schooling 
species  remains  near  shore  in  depths  from  the  surface  to  18.8  m (60  feet.  Miller 
and  Lea  1972).  Schools  of  juveniles  will  sometimes  wander  into  shallow  bays. 
Although  today  barracudas  often  are  captured  by  gill  nets,  the  inhabitants  of 
SBa-1  probably  took  barracudas  by  hook  and  line. 

Remains  of  Pacific  barracuda  have  been  recovered  from  midden  sites  in 
Ventura  (Fitch  1969a,  1975;  Follett  1933,  1965;  Tartaglia  1976),  Los  Angeles 


18 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


(Follett  1963b,  1969;  Tartaglia  1976)  and  San  Diego  Counties  (Follett  1976). 
Material:  6 otoliths.  Figs.  5D,  6C,D,E. 

Xiphiidae  - Swordfish 

Xiphias  gladius  - Swordfish.  — This  species  is  found  worldwide  in  warm 
and  temperate  seas,  but  in  the  eastern  Pacific  it  is  found  from  Chile  to  Oregon. 
The  swordfish  occurs  off  our  coast  only  during  a few  summer  months  each 
year.  They  frequently  rest  at  the  surface  but  have  been  seen  at  depths  greater 
than  666  m (2000  feet,  Fitch  and  Lavenberg  1971).  The  largest  recorded  speci- 
men measured  4.5  m (14  feet  1 1-14  inches,  Fitch  and  Lavenberg  1971)  and 
weighed  535  kg  (1182  pounds,  Fitch  and  Lavenberg  1971).  This  specimen  was 
captured  off  the  coast  of  Chile  in  1953.  The  Indians  probably  obtained 
swordfish  with  harpoons  during  summer  months. 

Swordfish  remains  have  been  reported  from  midden  sites  in  Ventura 
County  (Fitch  1969a;  Follett  1933)  and  from  the  Burton  Mound  Site  (Har- 
rington 1928). 

Material:  7 vertebrae.  Figs.  5F,G. 

ELEMENTS  OF  IDENTIFICATION 

Otoliths  were  by  far  the  most  important  element  in  identifying  teleosts 
from  SBa-1.  Twenty  of  the  29  species  (representing  69  percent)  were  identified 
from  otoliths;  the  next  most  useful  elements  were  premaxillaries,  pharyngeal 
bones,  dentaries  and  vertebrae.  Four  species  were  identifiable  by  each  of  these 
elements,  representing  only  14  percent  of  the  teleost  species.  For  identifying 
elasmobranchs,  which  do  not  possess  otoliths,  teeth  were  the  most  important 
element.  All  16  of  the  sharks  were  identifiable  on  the  basis  of  teeth  alone.  One 
species  also  was  identified  from  dermal  denticles  and  another  by  a dorsal  fin 
spine,  each  representing  less  than  6.5  percent  of  the  elasmobranch  species. 
Small  mesh  screens  are  not  only  necessary  for  retaining  small  otoliths,  but  are 
important  in  the  collecting  of  elasmobranch  remains.  From  the  lA- inch 
screenings  a total  of  four  species  could  be  identified;  from  the  18-mesh,  eight 
species;  and  from  the  30-mesh,  11  species.  Six  species  of  four  families  were 
retained  only  by  the  30-mesh  screen.  Utilizing  screens  smaller  than  30-  or 
32-mesh  is  not  practical.  There  are  otoliths  which  will  pass  through  such 
screens,  but  they  represent  fishes  that  would  not  likely  have  been  utilized  as 
food  by  the  Indians  who  inhabited  these  sites.  It  would  be  desirable  to  examine 
a large  midden  sample  with  30-mesh  screens,  but  if  a shortage  of  time  makes 
this  impossible  at  least  a 6 x 6-inch  control  column  should  be  given  this  fine 
screening  examination. 

OTOLITHS  IN  ORNAMENTATION 

A necklace  in  the  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County 
(LACM)  no.  A.  5600/99  from  a San  Nicolas  Island  site,  mentioned  by  Fitch 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


19 


Scientific  name 


TABLE  1 


a 

<u 

x oo 
2 e 
S be 
2 j=  o 

CX  CX-O 


e 

> 


C3  0) 

2.S 

o cx 


Elasmobranchs 

Alopias  vulpinus 
Carcharodon  carcharias 
Cephaloscyllium  ventriosum 
Dasyatis  dipterura 
Galeorhinus  zyopterus 
Heterodontus  francisci 
Isurus  oxyrinchus 
Mustelus  californicus 
Myliobatis  californica 
Myliobatoidei 
Notorynchus  maculatus 
Prionace  glauca 
Raja  spp. 

Rhinobatos  productus 
Saualus  acanthias 
Squatina  californica 


Teleosts 

Amphistichus  argenteus 
Atherinops  affinis  7 

Atherinopsis  californiensis  3 

Cymatogaster  aggregata  2 

Cynoscion  nobilis  2 

Damalichthys  vacca 
Engraulis  mordax  148 

Embiotocids 

Genyonemus  lineatus  932 

Hyperprosopon  argenteum  2 

Merluccius  productus 
Neoclinus  uninotatus  1 

Oxyjulis  californica  2 

Paralichthys  californicus 
Phanerodon  furcatus  5 

Pimelometopon  pulchrum 
Pneumatophorus  japonicus  4 

Porichthys  notatus  1 

Sarda  chiliensis 

Sardinops  caeruleus  3 

Sebastes  atrovirens  1 

Sebastes  diploproa  1 

Sebastes  goodei  9 

Sebastes  miniatus  2 

Sebastes  spp.  X 


1 

3 

4 
4 

13 

4 

4 

2 

57 

1 

1 

12  1* 

1 

25 

9 395** 


58 

2 


X 

7 26 

1 

9 


33 

X 


2 


20 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


TABLE  1 (Continued) 


Scientific  name 


o 


Teleosts  (continued) 


Seriola  dorsalis 
Seriphus  politus 


42 


Sphyraena  argentea 
Trachurus  symmetricus 
Xiphias  gladius 


6 X 


X X 


7 


X 


(*)  Wing  spines. 

(**)  Dermal  denticles. 


(1969a),  is  constructed  of  white  seabass  otoliths  and  Olivella  shells  (Fig.  7). 
The  30  otoliths  (14  right  sagittae  + 16  left  sagittae)  have  been  drilled  through 
the  thick  knob-like  protrusion  on  the  outer  face.  The  otoliths  apparently  were 
drilled  part  way  through  on  one  side  and  then  turned  over  and  completed  from 
the  other  side.  The  hardness  of  otoliths  as  well  as  their  vulnerability  to  fracture 
when  drilling  pressure  is  applied  indicates  that  great  patience  was  required  to 
complete  this  necklace.  None  of  the  otoliths  from  SBa-1  showed  any  signs  of 
such  drilling  or  unnatural  modification. 

Also  in  the  LACM  collection  is  an  artifact  (no.  L.2100.  A.  902.70-1)  from 
another  midden  in  Los  Angeles  County  (LAn-174)  in  which  white  croaker 
otoliths  were  used  in  a decoration  (Fig.  8)  believed  to  be  a portion  of  a water 
jug  (C.  Rozaire,  personal  communication).  Small  pebbles  and  shell  fragments 
are  embedded  randomly  in  the  asphalt;  these  are  probably  a natural  encase- 
ment. A faint  fabric-like  pattern  is  detectable  on  part  of  the  asphalt  surface. 
Sixteen  white  croaker  sagittae  (22  present  in  an  earlier  photograph)  also  are 
embedded  in  the  asphalt  in  an  “L” -shaped  pattern.  All  of  the  otoliths  are 
embedded  with  the  outer  face  showing  and  nearly  all  with  the  end  pointing 
inward.  There  is  no  apparent  pattern  in  the  placement  of  right  and  left  sagittae. 
Three  white  croaker  sagittae  were  loose  in  the  bottom  of  the  tray  and  several 
“empty”  otolith  impressions  can  be  seen  in  the  “L” shaped  pattern  in  the 
asphalt.  It  is  assumed  that  the  otoliths  are  merely  a form  of  decoration;  no 
other  explanation  is  suggested  at  present.  None  of  the  otoliths  recovered  from 
SBa-1  shows  any  asphalt  or  tar  residues  to  suggest  their  possible  use  as  orna- 
ments, trinkets  or  fetishes. 

COMPARISON  BETWEEN  THE  FISH  REMAINS  AND  FISHING 
TECHNIQUES  OF  SBa-1  AND  OTHER  SITES 

The  oceanic  environment  adjacent  to  SBa-1  and  Ven-3  in  Ventura  County 
is  nearly  identical,  both  sites  possessing  offshore  kelp  beds,  sandy  regions  and 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


21 


nearby  rocky  habitat;  and  similar  species  of  fishes  inhabit  their  coastal  regions. 
The  similarity  of  the  fishing  cultures  of  these  two  villages  is  reflected  in  the  fish 
remains  (Table  2).  Thirty-one  (72  percent)  of  the  41  species  from  SBa-1  (which 
likely  were  captured  by  the  inhabitants  as  food  items)  also  were  recovered  from 
the  Ven-3  midden.  Of  the  species  thought  to  have  been  captured  directly  by  the 
inhabitants,  48  percent  from  SBa-1  probably  were  captured  by  hook  and  line 
compared  to  52  percent  from  Ven-3.  Twenty-eight  percent  of  the  species  of 
SBa-1  probably  were  captured  by  gill  nets  compared  to  33  percent  from  Ven-3. 
Probable  beach  seine  captures  accounted  for  40  percent  of  the  species  from 
SBa-1  and  44  percent  of  the  species  from  Ven-3.  Eight  percent  of  the  species  of 
SBa-1  were  captured  by  other  methods  compared  with  11  percent  of  the 
species  of  Ven-3.  These  figures  are  only  approximate  since  in  several  cases 
some  of  the  species  probably  were  captured  by  more  than  one  method.  Unfor- 
tunately, there  are  no  age-data  correlations  between  our  samples  from  SBa-1 
and  those  from  the  Ven-3  site  reported  by  Fitch  (1969a).  It  is  apparent  that 
these  two  villages  were  utilizing  similar  fishing  techniques  and  were  oriented 
strongly  towards  a marine  fishery.  This  is  in  contrast  with  the  inhabitants  of 
Ora- 190  in  Orange  County,  who  apparently  utilized  only  hook  and  line  and 
traps  in  taking  fish  (Fitch  1967).  The  inhabitants  of  SLO-2,  San  Luis  Obispo 
County,  also  were  apparently  not  fishery  oriented,  although  they  occupied  the 
same  site  for  several  thousand  years:  “There  is  no  evidence  that  they  prog- 
ressed beyond  a hook  and  line  fishery  . . (Fitch  1972). 

ELASMOBRANCH  REMAINS 

The  relative  scarcity  of  shark  teeth  in  the  SBa-1  midden  when  compared  to 
the  total  number  of  vertebrae  recovered  is  perhaps  the  result  of  one  or  two 
factors.  First,  sharks  could  have  been  decapitated  at  or  near  their  point  of 
capture  or  at  a “cleaning  station”,  reducing  the  total  weight  to  be  carried  and 
the  chance  of  being  “bitten”.  Second,  the  teeth  could  have  been  utilized  in 
some  form  of  ornamentation  or  other  artifact  usage,  but  there  is  no  indication 
of  this. 


Analysis  of  Fish  Remains 

In  attempting  to  analyze  the  fishery  habits  of  the  inhabitants  of  SBa-1  we 
selected  only  the  bony  fishes  for  which  an  approximate  minimum  number  of 
individual  (MNI)  fish  could  be  determined.  Further,  we  utilized  only  those 
species  that  were  presumed  to  be  food  sources.  We  omitted  the  anchovies 
because  it  was  not  possible  to  determine  how  many  of  the  otoliths  were  from 
stomachs  of  predators  captured  by  the  Indians.  The  number  of  otoliths  for  each 
species  was  divided  by  two  (since  each  fish  has  two  sagittae),  a practice  which 
assumes  that  both  right  and  left  sagittae  were  recovered,  but  if  not  true,  estab- 
lishes a minimum  number.  For  other  elements  (identifications  based  solely  on 
vertebrae,  etc.)  only  a MNI  of  one  was  interpreted,  although  in  the  case  of  the 


22 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


TABLE  2 

Probable  method  of  capture 

Hook 

Scientific  name  Occurrence  and  Beach  Gill 

in  Ven-3  line  seine  net  Other 


Elasmobranchs 

Alopias  vulpinus 
Carcharodon  carcharias 
Cephaloscyllium  ventriosum 
Dasyatis  dipterura 
Galeorhinus  zyopterus 
Heterodontus  francisci 
Isurus  oxyrinchus 
Mustelus  californicus 
Myliobatis  californica 
Notorynchus  maculatus 
Prionace  glauca 
Raja  spp. 

Rhinobatos  productus 
Squalus  acanthias 
Squatina  californica 
Triakis  semifasciata 

Teleosts 

Amphistichus  argenteus 
Atherinopos  affinis 
Atherinopsis  californiensis 
Cymatogaster  aggregata 
Cynoscion  nobilis 
Damalichthys  vacca 
Engraulis  mordax 
Genyonemus  lineatus 
Hyperprosopon  argenteum 
Merluccius  productus 
Oxyjulis  californica 
Paralichthys  californicus 
Phanerodon  furcatus 
Pimelometopon  pulchrum 
Pneumatophorus  japonicus 
Sarda  chiliensis 
Sardinops  caeruleus 
Sebastes  atrovirens 
Sebastes  goodei 
Sebastes  miniatus 
Seriphus  politus 
Sphyraena  argentea 
Stereolepis  gigas 
Trachurus  symmetricus 
Xiphias  gladius 


X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 


X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 


X 

X 

X 

X 


X 

X 

X 

X 


X 


X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 


X 

X 

X 

X 

X 


X 


X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 


X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 


X 


X 


X 

X 

X X 

X 


X X 


X 

X 

X 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


23 


swordfish  the  seven  vertebrae  could  have  come  from  seven  different  individuals. 

Since  it  was  not  possible  to  determine  the  MNI  for  the  elasmobranchs 
because  of  the  abundance  of  teeth  in  a single  jaw,  no  attempt  was  made  to 
indicate  preference  or  selective  fishing  for  this  group.  According  to  present- 
day  taste  standards  the  thresher  shark  is  considered  choice,  followed  closely 
by  the  white  shark  and  the  shortfm  mako,  but  all  of  these  are  fast-swimming 
forms  and  not  easily  taken  (S.P.  Applegate,  personal  communication). 

A minimum  of  538  bony  fishes  was  represented  by  the  teleost  remains. 
Although  we  considered  23  species  to  be  potential  food  fishes,  19  of  these 
constituted  only  6.4  percent  MNI;  whereas  white  croaker  constituted  86.6 
percent  MNI.  Single  representatives  of  such  large  fishes  as  the  giant  sea  bass 
and  swordfish  would  yield  large  poundage  of  food,  but  the  relative  scarcity  of 
their  remains  in  SBa-1  tends  to  indicate  only  limited  or  occasional  usage  and  we 
do  not  believe  that  they  were  relied  upon  heavily  for  food.  The  large  percent- 
age of  white  croaker  suggests  strongly  that  the  Indians  either  preferred  this 
species  or  else  it  was  easy  to  catch  and  not  undesirable. 

Although  a hook  and  line  fishery  would  account  for  the  greatest  diversity 
of  teleostean  species  when  compared  with  other  fishing  methods  used  by  the 
Indians,  it  could  not  have  accounted  for  more  than  6.6  percent  of  the  MNI. 
Beach  seining  probably  took  the  second  greatest  number  of  species,  but  only 
2.76  percent  MNI.  Fewer  species  were  taken  by  gill  netting  but  this  method 
apparently  accounted  for  nearly  92  percent  MNI.  All  other  methods  yielded 
only  a fraction  of  one  percent  MNI.  Gill  netting  is  indicated  as  the  primary 
method  of  fish  gathering. 


DISCUSSION 

Fish  remains  were  very  scarce  in  all  samples  obtained  from  the  slope  of 
Rincon  Hill.  The  slope  area  is  believed  to  be  an  older  region  of  occupation, 
estimated  to  be  2000  to  1000  B.C.  (Evans  et  al.  1968).  Three  radiocarbon  dates 
obtained  from  samples  collected  by  Lyon  and  Harrison  in  1959-60,  were  1320 
B.C.  ± 250  years,  1470  B.C.  ± 130  years  and  1580  B.C.  ± 60  years  (Radiocar- 
bon 1963:290).  Sufficient  fish  remains  were  recovered  from  Rincon  Hill  to 
indicate  that  fish  were  utilized  in  the  Indians’  diet.  The  lack  of  variety,  the 
absence  of  open  ocean  or  deep  dwelling  species,  and  the  overall  sparseness  of 
the  fish  remains  indicate  a minimal  usage  of  fish  as  a food  source.  This  proba- 
bly reflects  inadequate  technical  skills  or  inefficient  fishing  methods  at  that 
stage  of  cultural  development. 

This  is  in  contrast  with  the  lower  and  more  recently  occupied  region  of  the 
SBa-1  complex.  Based  on  the  fish  material  we  recovered  the  occupants  of  the 
lower  area  displayed  highly  advanced  fishing  techniques  and  depended  upon 
the  sea  as  a primary  source  of  food.  The  occupation  of  this  lower  region 
pen6isted  into  historic  times. 

Among  the  samples  from  the  lower  region  were  remains  of  many  pelagic  or 
open  ocean  fishes,  species  which  could  not  have  been  captured  from  shore. 


24 


No.  289 


Contributions  in  Science 


Based  on  the  life  habits  of  the  fishes  (presumably  these  habits  have  not  changed 
in  the  last  several  thousand  years),  the  inhabitants  of  this  lower  region  were 
utilizing  crafts  to  carry  them  well  beyond  the  surf  zone  and  kelp  beds  where 
they  harpooned  swordfish,  white  sharks,  thresher  sharks,  blue  sharks  and 
shortfin  makos.  With  deep  hook  and  line  fishing  they  were  able  to  take  skates, 
spiny  dogfish  and  rockfish;  closer  to  shore,  hook  and  line  methods  were  practi- 
cal in  kelp  bed  areas  to  obtain  California  sheephead.  In  shallow  waters  and  surf 
zones  beach  seines  would  explain  the  presence  of  smaller-mouthed  fishes  such 
as  topsmelt,  jacksmelt,  and  some  of  the  small  surfperches  as  well  as  bat  rays 
and  sting  rays.  Use  of  gill  nets  was  demonstrated  by  the  abundance  of  white 
croaker  otoliths  of  nearly  identical  sizes.  Fishes  that  inhabit  shallow  water  and 
are  approached  easily,  such  as  the  shovelnose  guitarfish  and  the  horn  shark, 
could  have  been  taken  by  hand  or  spear. 

A variety  of  fishing  gear  has  been  reported  for  the  Chumash:  plank 
canoes,  harpoons,  fish  spears,  harpoon  arrows,  shellfish  hooks,  bone  fish 
hooks,  traps  and  nets  (Hoover  1973;  Richie  and  Hager  1973).  Concerning  the 
SBa-1  sites  only  shell  fish  hooks  have  been  reported  (Evans  et  al.  1968).  Evans 
et  al.  (1968:24-25)  described  a 1 ‘donut-shaped  stone”  as  follows:  “One  ar- 
tifact ...  is  a round  cobble  which  has  had  a cylindrical  hole  (which)  contains  a 
large  amount  of  asphaltum.”  This  stone  was  nine  centimeters  in  diameter,  6.8 
cm  thick  and  had  a bore  diameter  of  3 cm.  It  is  obvious  from  this  description 
that  they  were  dealing  with  a stone  fishing  weight  (sinker)  probably  similar  to 
those  illustrated  by  Hoover  (1973,  plate  4,  fig.  B and  C).  Vague  descriptions  of 
“pointed  bone  artifacts”  and  “hammered  stones”  by  Evans  et  al.  (1968)  ren- 
der it  impossible  to  determine  if  some  of  these  materials  were  remnants  or 
represented  bone  fish  hooks,  bone  gorges,  or  fishing  weights.  Such  artifacts 
should  have  been  present  at  the  site. 

Olson  (1971)  noted  that  “ear  bones”  could  at  times  be  of  value  in  age 
determination  but  failed  to  mention  their  significance  in  establishing  specific 
identifications.  Further,  he  suggests  that  the  lack  of  fish  remains  in  some  sites 
could  be  due  to  the  possible  cartilaginous  skeletal  elements  such  as  found  in 
Salmo;  this  theory  overlooks  the  fact  that  Salmo  otoliths,  as  with  most  otoliths, 
are  aragonitic  in  composition.  Even  fishes  which  possess  poorly  ossified 
skeletal  structures,  if  present  in  the  midden,  would  leave  behind  their  otoliths. 

In  his  discussion  on  shark  remains,  Olsen  (1971:2-6)  states,  “A  number  of 
cartilaginous  fish  are  poisonous  when  eaten  by  man,  and  it  is  not  known 
whether  the  recovered  shark  and  ray  elements  are  the  residue  of  meals  or 
represent  some  other  use  by  man.”  S.P.  Applegate  (personal  communication) 
states  that  none  of  the  sharks  or  rays  occurring  in  waters  off  North  America  is 
poisonous  when  eaten  by  man.  Therefore,  there  is  no  reason  to  assume  that  the 
shark  and  rays  recognized  in  a midden  site  do  not  constitute  food  items. 

Unfortunately  the  randomness  of  our  samples  and  the  disrupted  state  of 
the  Rincon  site  (SBa-1)  prevented  a study  of  an  interesting  transgression  of  the 
SBa-1  inhabitants  from  a terrestrial  hunting  to  a marine-oriented  people. 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


25 


Figure  1.  A lsurus  oxyrinchus  tooth,  18.9  mm  high;  B.  Alopias  vulpinus  tooth,  6.0  mm 
high;  C.  Squatina  californica  tooth,  3.8  mm  high;  D.  Carcharodon  carcharias  tooth,  22.5 
mm  high;  E.  Notorynchus  maculatus  incomplete  tooth,  9.0  mm  length  of  base;  F. 
Cephaloscyllium  ventriosum  tooth,  2.7  mm  high;  G.  Squalus  acanthias  tooth,  3.7  mm 
length  of  base;  H.  Prionace  glauca  worn  tooth,  8.5  mm  high;  I.  Galeorhinus  zyopterus 
tooth,  4.1  mm  high. 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


Figure  2.  A.  Mustelus  californicus  tooth,  1.1  mm  high;  B.  Raja  sp.  tooth,  2.1  mm  high; 
C.  Rhinobatos  productus  tooth,  1.4  mm  high;  D.  Triakis  semifasciata  tooth,  3.2  mm 
high;  E.  Dasyatis  dipterura  tooth,  1.7  mm  high;  F . Heterodontus  francisci  anterior  tooth, 
2.9  mm  high;  G.  Heterodontus  francisci  posterior  tooth,  7.6  mm  high;  H.  Heterodontus 
francisci  incomplete  dorsal  spine,  31.4  mm;  I.  Myliobatoidei  incomplete  caudal  sting, 
49.0  mm;  J.  Myliobatis  californica  dorsal  view  median  tooth,  26.3  mm  length  of  base;  K. 
Myliobatis  californica  ventral  view  median  tooth. 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


27 


Figure  3.  A.  Atherinops  affinis  left  sagitta,  5.1  mm;  B.  Neoclinus  uninotatus  left  sagitta, 
1.9  mm;  C.  Porichthys  notatus  eroded  right  sagitta,  1.3  mm;  D.  Sardinops  caeruleus 
right  sagitta,  3.5  mm;  E.  Engraulis  mordax  right  sagitta,  4.0  mm;  F.  Oxyjulis  californica 
left  sagitta,  1.9  mm;  G.  Cymatogaster  aggregata  right  sagitta,  6.7  mm;  H.  Phanerodon 
furcatus  right  sagitta,  8.4  mm;  I.  Hyperprosopon  argenteum  right  sagitta,  6.7  mm. 


28 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


Figure  4.  A.  Cynoscion  nobilis  eroded  left  sagitta,  25.7  mm;  B.  Cynoscion  nobilis  left 
sagitta,  21.1  mm;  C.  Seriphus  politus  left  sagitta,  9.3  mm;  D.  Genyonemus  lineatus  left 
sagitta,  18.0  mm;  E.  Pneumatophorus  japonicus  left  sagitta,  5.3  mm;  F.  Sebastes  atrovi- 
rens  right  sagitta,  10.1  mm;  G.  Sebastes  goodei  left  sagitta,  19.8  mm;  H.  Sebastes 
diploproa  eroded  right  sagitta  rostrum  missing,  10.2  mm;  I.  Sebastes  miniatus  right 
sagitta,  18.7  mm. 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


29 


Figure  5.  A.  A mphistichus  argenteus  pharyngeal  tooth,  4.8  mm;  B.  Damalichthys  vacca 
pharyngeal  tooth,  6.0  mm  high;  C.  Piomelometopon  pulchrum  tooth,  7.3  mm  high;  D. 
Sphyraena  argentea  left  sagitta,  15.2  mm;  E.  Damalichthys  vacca  lower  pharyngeal  bone, 
26.2  mm  wide;  F.  Xiphias  gladius  vertebra,  46.9  mm  length;  G.  Xiphias  gladius  end  view 
of  vertebra,  47.6  mm  diameter;  H.  Oxyjulis  californica  lower  pharyngeal  bone,  5.2  mm 
wide;  I.  Stereolepis  gigas  vertebra,  60.0  mm  high. 


30 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


Figure  6.  A.  Pneumatophorus  japonicus  incomplete  right  dentary,  42.9  mm  B.  Sarda 
chiliensis  left  dentary,  56.3  mm;  C.  Sphyraena  argentea  right  dentary,  64.4  mm;  D. 
Sphyraena  argentea  right  palatine,  51.8  mm;  E.  Sphyraena  argentea  incomplete  right 
pre-maxillary,  30.3  mm;  F.  Paralichthys  californicus  incomplete  left  pre-maxillary,  45.1 
mm;  G.  Oxyjulis  californica  right  dentary,  10.9  mm. 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


31 


Figure  7.  Necklace,  LACM  no.  5600/99,  constructed  with  Cynoscion  nobilis  otoliths 
and  Olivella  shells. 


32 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


Figure  8.  Fragment  of  “water  jug”  LACM  no. L. 2100.  A. 902. 70-1  containing  otoliths  of 
Genyonemus  line  at  us. 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


33 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  wish  to  thank  the  following  individuals  for  their  assistance  and  contri- 
butions in  our  studies:  Shelton  P.  Applegate,  for  verification  of  the  elasmo- 
branch  remains;  R.O.  Browne,  C.H.Eugler,  Frances  A.  Fitch  and  Roberta 
Greenwood  who  were  important  for  John  Fitch’s  samples;  Leonard  Nelson, 
University  of  California,  Los  Angeles,  for  historical  information  on  the  SBa-1 
site;  Mark  Roeder,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County,  and 
Bruce  Welton,  University  of  California,  Berkeley,  for  their  aid  in  the  elasmo- 
branch  identifications:  Camm  C.  Swift,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los 
Angeles  County,  for  his  aid  in  the  identification  of  the  teleost  material;  Robert 
J.  Lavenberg,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County,  for  his  helpful 
comments  in  the  construction  of  this  manuscript. 

We  especially  wish  to  thank  John  E.  Fitch,  California  Department  of  Fish 
and  Game,  for  incorporation  of  his  site  samples  into  our  study,  for  confirma- 
tion of  otolith  identifications,  and  for  his  encouragement  and  invaluable  advice 
throughout  our  study. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Baxter,  John  L.  1966.  Summary  of  biological  information  on  the  northern  anchovy 
Engraulis  mordax  Girard.  Calif.  Coop.  Oceanic  Fish  Invest.,  Prog.  Rept. 
(1 1):  1 10-1 16. 

Besednov,  L.N.  1973.  Food  fish  of  Sidimi  Bay  (an  inlet  of  Peter  the  Great  Bay)  in  the 
middle  Holocene.  Jour.  Ich.  No.  1,  1973:33-37. 

Bigelow,  H.B.,  and  W.C.  Schroeder.  1948.  Chapter  three,  sharks.  Mem.  Sears  Fdn 
mar.  Res.,  l(l):56-576. 

Boas,  F.  1895.  Tenth  report  on  the  northwestern  tribes  of  Canada.  Dept.  Brit.  Assoc. 
Adv.  Sci.,  1895.  No.  65. 

1916.  Tsimshian  mythology.  Bur.  Amer.  Ethnol.  Ann.  Rep.  1909-1910.  U.S. 

Government  Printing  Office,  Washington,  D.C. 

Bonham,  K.  1942.  Records  of  three  sharks  on  the  Washington  coast.  Copeia 
1942(4):  264-265. 

Bonham,  K.,  F.  B.  Stanford,  W.  Clegg  and  G.C.  Bucher.  1949.  Biological  and  vitamin 
A studies  of  dogfish  landed  in  the  State  of  Washington.  Wash.  Dep.  Fish.  Biol.  Rep. 
49A:83-114. 

Drucker,  P.  1955.  Indians  of  the  Northwest  Coast.  The  Natural  History  Press,  N.Y. 

1965.  Cultures  of  the  North  Pacific  Coast.  Chandler  Publishing  Co.,  San 

Francisco. 

Evans,  Robert  K.,  Joel  Grossman  and  James  T.  Toney.  1968.  Archaeological  Salvage 
Investigations  at  Rincon  Point,  Site  4-SBa-l,  Santa  Barbara  County,  California. 
Unpublished  MS  on  file  at  UCLA  Archaeological  Survey,  Los  Angeles,  California. 
Finnerty,  Patrick.  1961.  Unpublished  MS  on  file  at  UCLA  Archaeological  Survey,  Los 
Angeles,  California. 

1964.  Unpublished  MS  on  file  at  UCLA  Archaeological  Survey,  Los  Angeles, 

California. 


34 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


Fitch,  John  E.  1967.  Fish  remains  recovered  from  a Corona  del  Mar,  California,  Indian 
midden  (Ora-190),  Calif.  Fish  and  Game,  53(3):  185-191. 

. 1968.  Otoliths  and  other  fish  remains  from  the  Timms  Point  Silt  (early  Pleis- 
tocene) at  San  Pedro,  California.  Los  Angeles  Co.  Mus.,  Contrib.  in  Sci.  146:1-29. 

. 1969a.  Fish  remains,  primarily  otoliths,  from  a Ventura,  California,  Chumash 

village  site  (Ven-3).  Mem.  So.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci.  8 (Appendix  A):56-71. 

. 1969b.  Fossil  records  of  certain  schooling  fishes  of  the  California  Current 

system.  Calif.  Mar.  Res.  Comm.,  CalCOFI  Rept.,  13:71-80. 

. 1972.  Fish  remains,  primarily  otoliths,  from  a coastal  Indian  midden  (SLO-2) 

at  Diablo  Cove,  San  Luis  Obispo  County,  California.  San  Luis  Obispo  Co.,  Ar- 
chaeol.  So.  Occ.,  Paper  no.  7:101-120. 

. 1975.  Fish  remains  from  a Chumash  village  site  (Ven-87)  at  Ventura,  Califor- 
nia. In  3500  Years  on  One  City  Block,  Ventura  Mission  Plaza  Archaeological 
Project  1974.  Edited  by  Roberta  S.  Greenwood.  A Report  prepared  for  the  Re- 
development Agency,  City  of  San  Buenaventura,  California,  435-470. 

Fitch,  John  E.,  and  Robert  J.  Lavenberg.  1971.  Marine  food  and  game  fishes  of 
California.  University  of  Calfiornia  Press,  Calif.  Nat.  Hist.  Guides:  28:1-179. 

Follett,  W.I.  1933.  Incomplete  list  of  fishes  from  Point  Mugu  shellmound.  Unpublished 
list  on  file  at  Vert.  Paleo.  section,  Los  Angeles  Co.  Mus.  Nat.  Hist. 

. 1957.  Fish  remains  from  a shellmound  in  Marin  County,  California.  American 

Antiquity,  Vol.  23,  No.  1:68-71. 

. 1963a.  Fish  remains  from  Arroyo  Sequit  shellmound  (LAn-52),  Los  Angeles 

County,  California,  Calif.  Dept.  Parks  and  Recreation,  Div.  Beaches  and  Parks, 
Archeol.  Dept.,  9:113-121. 

. 1963b.  Fish  remains  from  the  Century  Ranch  site  (LAn-227),  Los  Angeles 

County,  California.  Univ.  Calif.  Los  Angeles,  Archeol.  Surv.,  Rept.  1962- 
1963:295-313. 

. 1964.  Fish  remains  from  a sixteenth  century  site  on  Drakes  Bay,  California. 

Univ.  Calif.  Los  Angeles,  Archeol.  Surv.,  Ann.  Rept.  1963-1964:27-41. 

. 1965.  Fish  remains  from  the  Conejo  Rock  Shelter  site  (Ven-69),  Ventura 

County,  California.  Univ.  Calif.  Los  Angeles,  Archeol.  Surv.  Ann.  Rept.,  1964- 
1965:81-90. 

. 1966.  Fish  remains  from  archaeological  sites  at  Irvine,  Orange  County, 

California.  Univ.  Calif.  Los  Angeles,  Archeol.  Surv.  Rept.,  1965-1966:185-195. 

. 1967.  Fish  remains  from  coprolites  and  midden  deposits  at  Lovelock  Cave, 

Churchill  County,  Nevada.  Repts.  Univ.  Calif.  Archeol.  Surv.,  Berkeley,  70:93- 
116. 

. 1968.  Fish  remains  from  two  submerged  deposits  in  Tomales  Bay,  Marin 

County,  California.  Occas.  Pap.,  Calif.  Acad.  Sci.,  67:1-8. 

. 1969.  Fish  remains  from  Century  Ranch  site  L An-229.  Los  Angeles  County, 

California.  Univ.  Calif.  Los  Angeles,  Archeol.  Surv.  Ann.  Rept.,  1968,  10:32-143. 

. 1972a.  Fish  remains  from  Mission  La  Soledad  Cemetry,  Mnt-223,  Monterey 

County,  California.  Monterey  Co.  Archeol.  Soc.  Quart.,  Vol.  1(3):  11. 

. 1972b.  Fish  remains  from  the  Kodani  Site  (Mnt-436,  Monterey  County, 

California).  Monterey  Co.  Archeol.  Soc.  Quart,  Vol.  I(4):3-4. 


1978 


Chumash  Midden  Fish  Remains 


35 


. 1973.  Fish  remains  of  the  Church  Rockshelter  Mnt-44,  Monterey  County, 

California.  Monterey  Co.  Archeol.  Soc.  Quart,  Vol.  11(4):  10-11. 

. 1974.  Fish  remains  from  the  Shelter  Hill  Site,  Marin  County,  California. 

Appendix  X.  San  Francisco  State  University  Treganza  Anthro.  Mus.  Pap.  15 
(MAPOM  pap.2):  145-159. 

. 1975a.  Fish  remains  from  the  west  Berkeley  shellmound  (Ca- Ala-307), 

Alameda  County,  California.  Contrib.  Univ.  Calif.  Archeol.  Res.  Fac.  No.  29, 
Appendix  G:123-129. 

. 1975b.  Fish  remains  from  the  Stege  mounds,  Richmond,  Contra  Costa 

County,  California.  Contrib.  Univ.  Calif.  Archeol.  Res.  Fac.  No.  29,  Appendix 
B:71-98. 

. 1976.  Fish  remains  from  an  archaeological  site  at  Rancho  Carrillo  on  the  Silver 

Strand,  San  Diego  County,  California.  Bull.  So.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci.  Vol.  75(2):  131- 
137. 

Frey,  Helen.  1974.  Preliminary  report  of  a micro-analysis  of  a San  Pedro,  California, 
Indian  midden  column.  Pacific  Coast  Archaelogical  Soc.,  Quart.  10(3  & 4):84-94. 

Garfield,  V.E.  1939.  Tsimshian  clan  and  society.  Univ.  Wash.  Publ.  Anthropol., 
7(3):  167-340. 

. 1966.  The  Tsimshians  and  their  neighbors.  In  Garfield,  V.  E.,  and  Wingert, 

P.S.,  The  Tsimshian  Indians  and  their  Arts,  Univ.  Wash.  Press,  pp.  1-55. 

Gould,  Richard  A.  1966.  Archaeology  of  the  Point  St.  George  site,  and  Tolowa  prehis- 
tory. Univ.  Calif.  Publ.  in  Anthro.  4:1-141. 

Harrington,  J.P.  1928.  Exploration  of  the  Burton  Mound  at  Santa  Barbara,  California. 
44th  Ann.  Rept.,  Bur.  Amer.  Ethnology,  Wash.,  D.C.  pp.  21-168. 

Hart,  J.L.  1973.  Pacific  fishes  of  Canada.  Fish.  Res.  Bd.  Canada.  Bull.  180. 

Hoover,  Robert  L.  1973.  Chumash  fishing  equipment.  San  Diego  Mus.  of  Man,  Ethnic 
Technoi.  Notes,  9. 

Ihering,  H.  von.  1891.  Uber  die  zoologisch-systematische  Bedeutung  der  Gehororgane 
der  Teleostier.  Zeitschrift  fur  wissenschaftliche  Zoologie  52:477-514. 

Joseph,  David  C.  1954.  A record-size  thresher  from  Southern  California;  Calif.  Fish  and 
Game  40(4):433-435. 

Meighan,  C.W.  1959.  The  Little  Harbor  site,  Catalina  Island:  an  example  of  ecological 
interpretation  in  archaeology.  Amer.  Antiquity  24:383-405. 

Meighan,  C.W.,  and  H.  Eberhart.  1953.  Archaeological  Resources  of  San  Nicolas 
Island,  California.  Amer.  Antiquity  19:109-125. 

Miller,  Daniel  J.,  and  Robert  N.  Lea.  1972.  Guide  to  the  coastal  marine  fishes  of 
California.  Calif.  Fish  and  Game  Bull.  157:1-235. 

Mitchell,  E.D.  Jr.,  1959.  Appendix  IV.  Faunal  and  human  skeletal  remains,  pp.  151- 
153.  In  : Curtis,  Freddie:  Arroyo  Sequit.  Archeol.  Surv.  Assoc.  So.  Calif.,  Los 
Angeles,  Pap.  4:1-169. 

Niblack,  A.P.  1890.  The  coast  Indians  of  Southern  Alaska  and  northern  British  Colum- 
bia. Ann.  Rep.  U.S.  Nat.  Mus.  1888. 

Olson,  R.P.  1930.  Chumash  Prehistory.  Univ.  Calif.  Publ.  in  Amer.  Archeol.  and 
Ethnology.  Vol.  28:1-21. 


36 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  289 


Olson,  Stanley  J.  1971.  Zooarchaeology:  animal  bones  in  archaeology  and  their  in- 
terpretation. Module  Pub.  2,  1971:1-30. 

Phillips,  Julius  B.  1957.  A review  of  the  rockfishes  of  California  (family  Scorpaenidae). 

Calif.  Dept.  Fish  and  Game,  Fish  Bull.,  104:1-158. 

Radiocarbon.  1963.  Page  290.  Published  by  Amer.  Jour,  of  Sci.,  New  Haven,  Connec- 
ticut. 

Randall,  J.E.  1973.  Size  of  the  great  white  shark  (Carcharodon).  Science,  181:169-170. 
Richie,  C.F.,  and  R.  Hager.  1973.  The  Chuymash  canoe,  the  structure  and  hy- 
drodynamics of  a model.  San  Diego  Museum  of  Man,  Ethnic  Technol.,  Notes  8. 
Rogers,  David  B.  1929.  Prehistoric  man  on  the  Santa  Barbara  coast.  Santa  Barbara 
Mus.  of  Nat.  Hist.,  Santa  Barbara. 

Shumway,  G.,  C.L.  Hubbs  and  J.R.  Moriarty.  1961.  Scripps  Estate  Site,  San  Diego, 
California:  a La  Jolla  site  dated  5460  to  7370  years  before  the  present.  Ann.  N.Y. 
Acad.  Sci.  93:37-132. 

Stweart,  F.L.  Unpublished  manuscript  on  file  in  the  Archives  of  the  Archaeological 
Survey  of  Canada,  National  Museum  of  Man,  Ottawa. 

Tartaglia,  Louis  J.  1976.  Prehistoric  maritime  adaptions  in  Southern  California.  Unpub- 
lished manuscript  on  file  at  University  of  Southern  California  at  Los  Angeles, 
California. 

Walker,  E.F.  Five  prehistoric  archaeological  sites  in  Los  Angeles  County,  California. 
Los  Angeles,  Southwest  Mus.  P.  116. 

Wallace,  W.J.  1962.  Archaeological  Investigations  in  the  Arroyo  Grande  Creek 
Watershed,  San  Luis  Obispo  County,  California.  Archeol.  Surv.  Univ.  Calif.  Los 
Angeles,  Ann.  Rept.  1961-1962:23-66. 

Waters,  Joseph  H.  1967.  Fish  remains  from  southern  New  England  archaeological  sites. 
Copeia  1967.  no.  1:244-245. 

Accepted  for  publication  March  2,  1977. 


501  ■ 73 
C3 LS6& 


NUMBER  290 
MARCH  21,  1978 


LATE  MIOCENE  MARINE  BIRDS 
FROM  ORANGE  COUNTY,  CALIFORNIA 


By  Hildegarde  Howard 


NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCENC6 


Published  by  the  NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM 
OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007 


SERIAL  PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE 
NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 


Prior  to  November  30,  1973,  publications  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  have  appeared 
under  various  formats— Leaflet  Series,  Museum  Graphic,  Science  Series,  Study  Guides,  Con- 
tributions in  Science,  Contributions  in  History,  Science  Bulletins,  unnumbered  catalogs  of 
exhibitions,  and  other  miscellaneous  publications.  The  Museum  now  publishes  the  following 
serials  at  irregular  intervals  as  CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE,  HISTORY  BULLETINS, 
SCIENCE  BULLETINS,  EDUCATION  SERIES,  HISTORY  SERIES,  and  SCIENCE  SE- 
RIES. The  Contributions  are  short  papers  of  octavo  size.  The  Bulletins  are  longer,  compre- 
hensive papers  of  quarto  size.  The  Series  are  papers  of  variable  lengths  of  quarto  or  larger 
size.  Papers  in  each  serial  are  numbered  separately  and  consecutively. 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  contain  articles  in  the  earth  and  life  sciences,  presenting 
results  of  original  research.  Emphasis  is  intended  principally  for  papers  allied  to  biosystematic 
research,  but  other  subjects  and  review-oriented  ones  will  be  considered.  Number  1 was  issued 
on  January  23,  1957.  Contributions  must  be  not  less  than  8 nor  exceed  72  printed  pages. 


INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  AUTHORS 

Acceptance  of  manuscripts  will  be  determined  by  the  significance  of  new  information.  Priority 
will  be  given  to  manuscripts  by  staff  members.  All  manuscripts  must  be  recommended  by  the 
curator  in  charge  of  each  discipline  or  by  the  Editorial  Board.  Manuscripts  must  conform  to 
the  specifications  listed  below.  They  will  be  examined  for  suitability  by  the  Editorial  Board 
and  will  include  review  by  specialists  outside  the  Museum. 

Authors  must  adhere  to  the  International  Code  of  Nomenclature  of  Bacteria  and  Viruses, 
International  Code  of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  and  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature, including  their  respective  recommendations.  Further,  authors  proposing  new  taxa  in 
a CONTRIBUTIONS"  IN  SCIENCE  must  indicate  that  all  primary  types  have  been  deposited 
in  an  appropriate  scientific  institution  of  their  choice  and  must  cite  that  institution  by  name. 

MANUSCRIPT  FORM. — (1)  In  preparation  of  copy  follow  the  1972  CBE  Style  Manual, 
third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapters  5 and  6.  (2)  Footnotes  should  be  avoided;  acknowledgments 
as  footnotes  will  not  be  accepted.  (3)  An  informative  abstract  must  be  included  for  all  papers. 
(4)  A Spanish  summary  is  required  for  all  manuscripts  dealing  with  Latin  American  subjects. 
Summaries  in  other  languages  are  not  required  but  are  strongly  recommended.  (5)  A differ- 
ential diagnosis  must  accompany  any  newly  proposed  taxon.  (6)  Submit  two  copies  of  manu- 
script. 

ILLUSTRATIONS. — All  illustrations,  including  maps  and  photographs,  will  be  referred  to 
as  figures.  All  illustrations  should  be  of  sufficient  clarity  and  in  proper  proportions  for  reduc- 
tion to  CONTRIBUTIONS  page  size.  In  preparing  illustrations  and  legends  consult  the  1972 
CBE  Style  Manual,  third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapter  5.  Submit  only  illustrations  made  with 
permanent  ink  and  glossy  photographic  prints  of  good  contrast.  Submit  duplicate  copies  of 
all  illustrations.  Original  illustrations  will  be  returned  after  the  manuscript  has  been  published. 

PROOF. — Authors  will  be  sent  galley  proofs  which  should  be  corrected  and  returned  promptly. 
No  changes  or  alterations,  other  than  typesetting  corrections,  will  be  allowed  unless  paid  by 
author.  Requests  for  reprints  may  be  placed  through  the  Editor. 

R.  Edward  Ostermeyer 
Editor 


All  communications  concerning  manuscripts  and  exchange  of  or  purchase  of  publications 
should  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Museum  Publications,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 

Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America  by  Chapman’s  Phototypesetting  on  70#  Patina  Book 


LATE  MIOCENE  MARINE  BIRDS 
FROM  ORANGE  COUNTY,  CALIFORNIA 


By  Hildegarde  Howard* 2 


Abstract:  Bone  fragments  from  five  sites  in  the  Late  Miocene  Monterey 
Formation  at  Laguna  Niguel,  Orange  County,  California,  represent  at  least  14 
species  of  marine  birds,  Gavia  brodkorbi  n.  sp.,  Diomedea  ? calif ornica, 
Diomedea  sp.,  Puffinus  barnesi  n.  sp.,  Oceanodroma  sp.,  Osteodontornis  orri 
Howard,  Morns  lompocanus  (Miller),  Moms  magnus  n.  sp.,  ?Miosula  media 
Miller,  ?Uria  sp.,  ?Cepphus  sp.,  ?Aethia  sp.,  Fraterculini  gen.  and  sp.  indet., 
and  Praemancalla  wetmorei  Howard.  The  avifauna  suggests  a slightly  younger 
phase  of  the  Late  Miocene  than  another  avifauna  previously  reported  from  the 
Monterey  Formation  in  Laguna  Hills,  three  miles  northward. 


INTRODUCTION 

In  1969,  during  the  excavation  for  the  North  American  Rockwell  Building 
(now  United  States  General  Services  Administration  Building)  on  El  Lazo 
Road  in  Laguna  Niguel,  Orange  County,  California,  fossiliferous  sands  and 
siltstones  of  the  Late  Miocene  Monterey  Formation  (Clarendonian  correlative) 
were  exposed.  Marine  mammals  and  birds  were  collected  in  the  actual  building 
excavation  and,  from  1969  to  1976,  in  adjacent  hillsides  within  a half-mile 
radius  of  the  El  Lazo  site. 

The  localities,  all  of  which  bear  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County  (LACM)  locality  numbers,  are  listed  below  (numbers  in  parentheses 
indicate  the  number  of  avian  bones  found).  Detailed  locality  descriptions  with 
reference  to  the  San  Juan  Capistrano  Quadrangle,  U.S.G.S.  7.5  minute,  1948 
edition,  are  on  file  in  the  Section  of  Vertebrate  Paleontology,  LACM. 

LACM  Loc.  3185  — Aliso  Creek.  From  coarse  yellow  sand.  (3) 

LACM  Loc.  6901  — El  Lazo  Road.  In  laminated  gray  to  white  siltstone.  (1) 
LACM  Loc.  6902  — - El  Lazo  Road.  From  coarse  yellow  sands  overlying 
siltstones  described  in  LACM  6901.  (21) 


Review  Committee  for  this  Contribution 
Lawrence  G.  Barnes 
Storrs  L.  Olson 
Stuart  Warter 

2Chief  Curator  Emeritus,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County,  900  Exposi- 
tion Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 


2 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  290 


LACM  Loc.  6906  — Site  of  excavation  for  North  American  Rockwell 
Building  on  El  Lazo  Road.  In  yellow  sands  and  laminated  gray 
siltstone.  (21) 

LACM  Loc.  7136 — Moulton  Parkway.  In  phosphatic  pebble  bed,  in  a gray 
siltstone.  (5) 

MATERIAL 

Fifty-one  avian  bone  fragments  were  recovered  from  the  Laguna  Niguel 
localities.  These  are  in  the  collections  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los 
Angeles  County  (LACM).  Thirty-nine  are  identified  and  assigned  to  seven 
familes. 

Comparative  fossil  material  used  in  connection  with  this  study  is  largely  in 
the  LACM  collections  and  includes,  in  addition  to  LACM  types  and  referred 
specimens,  casts  of  types  of  Gavia  concinna  Wetmore  1940;  Diomedea  califor- 
nica  Miller  1962;  Puffinus  conradi  Marsh  1870;  P.  diatomicus  Miller  1925;  P. 
incept  or  Wetmore  1930;  P.  mite  he  Hi  Miller  1961;  P.  priscus  Miller  1961;  Os- 
teodontornis  orri  Howard  1957;  Sula  willetti  Miller  1925;  Morns  lompocanus 
(Miller  1925);  Miosula  media  Miller  1925;  Palaeosula  stocktoni  (Miller  1935); 
and  Uria  antiqua  (Marsh  1870). 

In  addition,  the  following  material  was  made  available  on  loan:  from  the 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard  University  (MCZ),  referred 
tibiotarsus  (Wetmore  1943)  of  Diomedea  anglica  Lydekker  1891;  from  the 
Museum  of  Paleontology,  University  of  California,  Berkeley  (UCMP),  type 
and  reverse  of  type  of  Miosula  media  Miller  1925,  and  figured  specimens  of 
Morus  lompocanus  (Miller  1925 :pls.  7 and  9);  from  the  United  States  National 
Museum  of  Natural  History  (USNM),  previously  unreported  referred 
humerus  and  ulna  of  Miocepphus  mcclungi  Wetmore  1940,  identified  by  Storrs 
Olson. 

Recent  skeletal  material  used  for  comparison  is  largely  from  the  LACM 
collections,  but  also  includes  skeletons  of  Alcidae  obtained  on  loan  from  the 
Museum  of  Vertebrate  Zoology,  University  of  California,  Berkeley  (MVZ) 
and  California  State  University,  Long  Beach  (CSLB),  and  a skull  of  Morus 
bassanus  lent  by  Pierce  Brodkorb,  University  of  Florida,  Gainesville  (PB). 

HISTORICAL  REVIEW 

Miller  (1925)  was  the  first  to  document  Miocene  birds  from  marine  de- 
posits in  California,  naming  three  species  of  sulids,  a shearwater,  a godwit  and 
an  auklet  from  the  Late  Miocene  diatomaceous  shales  of  the  Sisquoc  Forma- 
tion near  Lompoc,  Santa  Barbara  County.  Within  the  next  ten  years  three  sites 
in  Los  Angeles  County  yielded  Late  Miocene  avian  fossils:  the  Modelo  For- 
mation at  Calabasas  (Miller  1929),  and  the  Monterey  Formation  at  Lomita  and 
San  Pedro  (Miller  1935).  Also,  in  the  same  decade  (1925-1935),  the  first  avian 
bones  from  the  Middle  Miocene  (Round  Mountain  Silt)  Sharktooth  Hill 


1978 


Miocene  Marine  Birds 


3 


Bonebed  were  recorded  (Wetmore  1930).  By  the  end  of  1935,  11  species  had 
been  described. 

No  further  marine  birds  from  the  California  Miocene  were  added  until  the 
1950’s  when  a flagstone  quarry  in  the  Monterey  Formation  in  Tepusquet  Can- 
yon, Santa  Barbara  County,  yielded  two  avian  skeletons.  Both  were  described 
under  extinct  families  (Howard  1957a  and  1957b).  Later  excavations  in  the  San 
Fernando  Valley  and  at  El  Sereno,  Los  Angeles  County,  yielded  additional 
records  of  some  of  the  previously  described  species  and  added  a new  sulid 
(Howard  1958,  and  Howard  and  White  1962).  Miller  (1951)  described  a storm 
petrel  during  this  decade,  from  the  Capistrano  Formation  near  San  Juan  Capis- 
trano, Orange  County.  The  age  of  the  deposit  was  given  as  Middle  Miocene, 
but  is  now  considered  to  be  either  Late  Miocene  or  Early  Pliocene  (Fife 
1974:19). 

The  1960’s  added  two  Miocene  bird  localities  in  California:  the  Jewett 
Sand  at  Pyramid  Hill,  Kern  County  (Early  Miocene)  yielded  a single  bone 
described  in  a new  family  related  to  the  cormorants  (Howard  1969),  and  a large 
collection  from  the  Monterey  Formation  at  Leisure  World,  Laguna  Hills, 
Orange  County  added  five  new  species  (Howard  1966a  and  1968).  Also,  within 
the  last  16  years,  five  additional  species  have  been  described  from  the 
Sharktooth  Hill  Bonebed  (Miller  1961  and  1962;  Howard  1966b;  Warter  1976). 

In  seven  of  the  1 1 areas  in  California  from  which  Miocene  marine  birds 
have  been  previously  obtained,  the  specimens  occur  as  partial  skeletons  or 
skeletal  impressions  on  slabs  of  shale.  Such  specimens  include  the  types  of  12 
of  the  26  recorded  species.  While  these  specimens  provide  information  on  the 
proportions  of  the  birds  involved,  the  finer  details  of  structure  are  usually  not 
clearly  preserved.  Consequently  it  becomes  difficult  to  compare  these  speci- 
mens with  the  isolated,  mineralized  bone  fragments  obtained  from  localities 
such  as  Sharktooth  Hill,  Pyramid  Hill,  Laguna  Hills  Leisure  World,  or  the  area 
discussed  herein. 

In  the  following  list  of  species  from  previously  recorded  marine  Miocene 
sites  in  California,  those  based  on  partial  skeletons  in  shale  slabs  are  marked 
with  an  asterisk. 

Procellariiformes 

Diomedeidae:  Diomedea  californica  Miller  1962;  D.  milleri  Howard  1966. 

Procellariidae:  *Puffmus  diatomic  us  Miller  1925;  P.  inceptor  Wetmore 
1930;  P.  mitchelli  Miller  1961;  P.  prisons  Miller  1961;  P.  calhouni 
Howard  1968;  Fulmar  us  hammeri  Howard  1968. 

Hydrobatidae:  *Oceanodroma  hubbsi  Miller  1951. 

Pelecaniformes 

Pseudodontornithidae;  *Osteodontornis  orri  Howard  1957. 

Sulidae:  *Sula  willetti  Miller  1925;  *Sula  polili  Howard  1958;  *Morus 
lompocanus  (Miller  1925);  M.  vagabundus  Wetmore  1930; 
*Palaeosula  Stockton i (Miller  1935);  *Miosula  media  Miller  1925. 


4 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  290 


Phalacrocoracidae:  *Phcilacrocorax  femoralis  Miller  1929. 

Plotopteridae:  Plotopterum  joaqainensis  Howard  1969. 

Anseriformes 

Anatidae:  Presbychen  abavus  Wetmore  1930. 

Falconiformes 

Pandionidae:  Pandion  homalopteron  Warter  1976. 

Charadriiformes 

Scolopacidae:  *Limosa  vanrossemi  Miller  1925. 

Alcidae:  Aethia  rossmoori  Howard  1968;  *Cerorhinca  dubia  Miller  1925; 
Alcodes  idnulus  Howard  1968;  Praemancalla  Icigunensis  Howard 
1966. 

Passeriformes 

Palaeoscinidae:  *PaIaeoscinis  turdirostris  Howard  1957. 

The  species  represented  at  Laguna  Niguel  bring  the  total  for  the  Alcidae  to 
five  identified  species,  and  the  totals  for  the  Procellariidae  and  the  Sulidae  to 
seven  species  each.  The  Order  Gaviiformes  (Gaviidae,  1 species)  is  added  to 
the  California  Miocene  list. 


SYSTEMATICS 
Order  GAVIIFORMES 

Family  Gaviidae  — Loons 
Genus  Gavia  Forster  1788 
Gavia  brodkorbi  new  species 


Figure  1 a,  b 


Holotype.  — Complete  left  ulna,  LACM  31173,  collected  by  Marion  J. 
Bohreer,  1969,  from  locality  LACM  6906. 

Diagnosis.  — Ulna  relatively  short  and  stout;  proximally,  attachment  for 
anterior  articular  ligament  short  and  broad  (roughly  triangular),  and  promi- 
nently set  off  from  shaft,  with  brachial  impression  deeply  rimming  its  palmar 
edge;  distal  tip  of  external  cotyla  bent  toward  shaft,  with  short  scar  running 
mediad  directly  beneath,  confining  small  radial  impression;  distally,  large  car- 
pal tuberosity  jutting  abruptly  from  shaft. 

Measurements.  — Greatest  length  81.0  mm,  breadth  across  proximal 
cotylae  9.4  mm,  breadth  of  shaft  at  middle  4.9  mm,  greatest  breadth  of  distal 
and  (through  carpal  tuberosity)  1 1.3  mm,  depth  of  distal  end  through  external 
crest  of  trochlea  7.5  mm,  length  of  attachment  for  anterior  articular  ligament 
4.4  mm,  breadth  of  same  4.0  mm. 


1978 


Miocene  Marine  Birds 


5 


Etymology.  — The  species  is  named  in  honor  of  Pierce  Brodkorb  in  recog- 
nition of  his  many  contributions  to  Paleornithology,  including  a review  of  fossil 
loons. 

Discussion.  — The  fossil  ulna  is  25  mm  (23.6%)  shorter  than  the  minimum 
for  this  element  in  four  LACM  specimens  of  the  Red-throated  Loon,  Gavia 
stellata  (Pontoppidan  1763),  but  is  relatively  stouter.  The  proximal  radial  im- 
pression is  more  confined  than  in  G.  stellata,  G.  pacifica  (Lawrence  1848),  or 
G.  immer  (Brunnich  1764).  Distally,  the  carpal  tuberosity  is  more  square  in 
outline  than  in  these  Recent  loons.  The  short,  broad  attachment  of  the  anterior 
articular  ligament,  also,  is  distinct  (the  attachment  is  longer  and  more  oval  in 
the  Recent  species). 

A photograph  of  an  ulna  of  Colymboides  minutus  Milne-Edwards  1867 
from  the  Early  Miocene  of  France,  illustrated  by  Storer  (1956,  Fig.  1,  g)  shows 
the  attachment  of  the  anterior  articular  ligament  to  be  broad  and  short.  Storer, 
however,  notes  that,  unlike  the  ulna  of  all  Recent  loons,  this  element  of  Co- 
lymboides lacks  the  groove  bordering  the  attachment  posteriorly.  This  groove 
is  present  in  G.  brodkorbi.  Furthermore,  the  carpal  tuberosity  in  Colymboides 
is  less  abruptly  projected  than  in  G.  brodkorbi  or  in  any  of  the  Recent  loons. 

The  only  previous  Miocene  record  of  the  genus  Gavia  was  based  on  a 
poorly  preserved  tibiotarsus  from  the  Calvert  Formation,  Maryland,  cited  by 
Wetmore  (1941)  as  Gavia  sp.  Four  species  have  been  described  from  the 
Pliocene:  Gavia  portisi  (Regalia  1902),  Middle  Pliocene  of  Italy;  Gavia  con- 
cinna  Wetmore  1940,  Early  Pliocene  of  Florida  and  Middle  and  Later  Pliocene 
of  California;  Gavia  palaeodytes  Wetmore  1943,  Early  Pliocene  of  Florida; 
Gavia  howardae  Brodkorb  1953,  Late  Pliocene  of  California. 

According  to  Brodkorb  (1953),  who  reviewed  these  species,  Gavia  portisi 
is  known  only  from  a cervical  vertebra  that  is  nearly  as  large  as  that  of  G. 
immer.  The  type  of  G.  concinna  is  an  ulna  much  larger  than  that  of  G.  brod- 
korbi (breadth  across  proximal  cotylae  11.6  mm),  and  is  further  distinguished 
by  a longer  attachment  for  the  anterior  articular  ligament.  G.  palaeodytes  is 
known  from  coracoid,  humerus  and  femur,  all  equal  to,  or  slightly  larger  than 
comparable  specimens  of  G.  stellata,  hence  larger  than  would  be  expected  for 
G.  brodkorbi. 

Gavia  howardae  was  described  from  an  incomplete  humerus  with  two 
additional  humeral  specimens  referred  (all  LACM).  The  smallest  referred 
humerus  provides  a measurement  of  length  (from  distal  end  to  distal  tip  of 
deltoid  crest)  of  91.5  mm,  which  is  14%  less  than  the  minimum  for  this  same 
measurement  in  G.  stellata  (106.5  mm).  The  type  of  G.  howardae  is  incom- 
plete, but  appears  to  have  been  longer  than  the  referred  specimen  (possibly 
within  7 mm  of  the  minimum  for  G.  stellata).  Relative  breadth  is  difficult  to 
determine  in  these  incomplete  specimens.  They  appear,  however,  to  be  of  less 
stocky  proportions  than  the  ulna  of  G.  brodkorbi.  Qualitatively  there  is  little  on 
which  to  base  comparison  of  the  humerus  of  G.  howardae  with  the  ulna  of  G. 
brodkorbi.  However,  the  long,  narrow  attachment  for  the  anterior  articular 


6 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  290 


ligament  on  the  humerus  of  G.  howardae  closely  resembles  the  condition  found 
in  G.  stellata  and  is  unlikely  to  correspond  with  the  unusually  short,  broad 
attachment  for  this  ligament  on  the  ulna  of  G.  brodkorbi. 

Order  PROCELLARIIFORMES 
Family  Diomedeidae  — Albatrosses 
Genus  Diomedea  Linnaeus  1758 
Diomedea  ? calif ornica  Miller  1962 

Figure  2 c 

Referred  material.  — Distal  end  of  tibiotarsus,  LACM  37629,  from  lo- 
cality LACM  6906. 

Discussion.  — Four  species  of  fossil  albatrosses  have  been  previously 
named:  D.  californica  Miller  1962  and  D.  milleri  Howard  1966b,  from  the 
Middle  Miocene  of  Sharktooth  Hill,  California;  D.  thyridata  Wilkinson  1969, 
from  the  Late  Miocene  of  Australia;  and  D.  anglica  Lydekker  1891,  from  the 
Pliocene  of  England  (type)  and  Florida  (specimen  referred  by  Wetmore  1943). 

D.  milleri  was  described  from  an  ulna  with  referred  tarsometatarsus,  both 
of  which  are  smaller  than  comparable  elements  ofD.  nigripes  Audubon  1839. 
D.  thyridata,  described  from  a rostrum,  is  likened  in  characters  and  size  (Wil- 
kinson 1969)  to  D.  melanophris  Temminck  1828.  It  would  appear,  therefore, 
that  both  D.  milleri  and  D.  thyridata  were  species  whose  size  range  was  below 
that  possible  for  the  species  represented  by  the  tibiotarsus  in  the  present  collec- 
tion. 

D.  californica  and  D.  anglica,  both  described  from  the  tarsometatarsus, 
were  larger  species  than  either  D.  milleri  or  D.  thyridata.  The  referred  speci- 
men of  D.  anglica  is  a distal  end  of  tibiotarsus.  This  specimen  (MCZ  2328)  was 
made  available  for  the  present  study  (Fig.  2,  B).  In  distal  breadth  LACM  37629 
from  Laguna  Niguel  is  only  slightly  larger  than  MCZ  2328.  It  differs  from  the 
latter,  however,  in  less  depression  of  the  supratendinal  bridge,  and  in  having  a 
well-developed,  papilla-like  internal  ligamental  attachment.  In  both  of  these 
characters  LACM  37269  resembles  D.  exulans  Linnaeus  1758,  whereas  MCZ 
2328  more  closely  resembles  D.  albatrus  Pallas  1769,  in  which  the  bridge  is 
more  depressed  and  the  ligamental  attachment  is  only  a scar.  Both  fossil 
specimens  differ  from  D.  exulans  in  more  horizontal  position  of  the  lower 
opening  of  the  tendinal  canal,  but  in  MCZ  2328  the  opening  is  more  restricted 
in  lateral  extent  than  in  LACM  37629. 

Comparison  of  the  Laguna  Niguel  specimen  with  D.  californica  rests  en- 
tirely on  size,  as  no  tibiotarsus  assignable  to  this  species  has  yet  been  forthcom- 
ing from  the  Sharktooth  Hill  Bonebed.  A second  tarsometatarsus  (LACM 
18203)  from  that  locality  is,  however,  now  at  hand.  This  is  slightly  larger,  but 
otherwise  similar  to  the  holotype.  The  distal  breadths  in  the  two  tarsometatarsi 
ofZ).  californica  are  92.3%  (holotype)  and  96.4%  (LACM  18203,  referred)  of 


1978 


Miocene  Marine  Birds 


7 


this  dimension  in  a tarsometatarsus  (LACM  Bi230)  of  D.  exulans.  Compared 
with  the  tibiotarsus  of  the  same  specimen  of  D.  exulans,  the  distal  breadth  of 
tibiotarsus  LACM  37629  from  Laguna  Niguel  is  96.7%  (Table  I).  It  appears 
reasonable,  therefore,  to  assign  this  specimen  to  D.  californica.  However, 
being  unable  to  compare  it  with  a tibiotarsus  from  the  type  locality  of  D. 
californica,  the  assignment  is  tentative. 

Diomedea  sp.  indeterminate 
Figure  2 a,  d 

Referred  material.  — Proximal  section  of  humerus,  LACM  58544,  from 
locality  LACM  6902,  and  distal  end  of  radius,  LACM  31172,  from  locality 
LACM  6906. 

Discussion.  — These  poorly  preserved  wing  bones  are  notably  smaller 
relative  to  those  of  D.  exulans  than  is  the  case  with  the  tarsometatarsi  of  D. 
californica  or  tibiotarsus  LACM  37629.  They  are  somewhat  smaller,  also,  than 
a distal  end  of  humerus  from  the  Sharktooth  Hill  Bonebed  previously  referred 
to  D.  californica  (Howard  1966b)  (see  Table  I). 

The  incomplete  humerus  lacks  the  tip  of  the  internal  tuberosity,  the  bicipi- 
tal crest  and  a large  portion  of  the  deltoid  crest.  It  resembles  the  humerus  ofD. 
exulans  in  the  broad  curvature  of  the  anconal  face  of  the  shaft,  but  the  area 
immediately  below  the  head  is  less  depressed.  On  the  palmar  surface,  the 
enlarged  distal  tip  of  the  deltoid  crest  resembles  the  condition  in  D.  exulans, 
but  the  crest  is  much  shorter  in  the  fossil.  The  radius  is  too  poorly  preserved 
for  analysis,  but  provides  a measurement  of  distal  breadth  (Table  I). 

Family  Procellariidae  — Shearwaters 

Genus  Puffinus  Brisson  1790 

Four  wing  bones  are  referable  to  the  genus  Puffinus.  Thirteen  species  of 
middle  to  late  Tertiary  shearwaters  of  this  genus  have  been  described  from 
Europe  and  North  America,  eight  of  which  are  from  the  west  coast  (see  Brod- 
korb  1963b,  and  Howard  1968  and  1971). 

After  consideration  of  these  species,  and  careful  comparison  with  speci- 
mens of  all  those  from  California,  I find  it  necessary  to  add  still  another 
species,  which  I refer  to  the  subgenus  Puffinus. 

Puffinus  barnesi  new  species 
Figure  1 e,  f 

Holotype.  — Left  humerus  lacking  proximal  end,  LACM  42652,  collected 
by  W.  Earl  Calhoun,  July  1969,  from  locality  LACM  6906. 

Diagnosis.  — Humerus  with  shaft  laterally  compressed  above  distal  end. 


8 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  290 


TABLE  1 

Comparison  of  Fossil  and  Recent  Specimens  of  Diomedea 


Ratio  Fossils  to  Recent 

Measurements  in  Millimeters  (In  Per  Cent) 


D.  calif - 
ornica* 

D.  sp.* 

*D.  ang-D.  exu- 
lica***  Ians**** 

D.  calif- 
ornica* 

D.  sp.** 

D.  ang- 
lica*** 

Tarsometatarsus 

Distal  breadth 

20.6-21.5 

19.3  22.3 

92.4-  96.4 

86.5 

Breadth  shaft 

9.0-10.0 

9.1 

96.8-109.0 

Proximal  breadth 

20.7  23.2 

89.1 

Tibiotarsus 

Distal  breadth 

20.6 

20.2  21.3 

96.7 

94.8 

Breadth  shaft 

10.0 

9.5  10.0 

100.0 

95.0 

Humerus 

Proximal  breadth 

39.2 

48.5 

80.8 

Distance  head  to 

end  deltoid  crest 

64.5 

....  83.7 

77.0 

Distal  breadth 

27.5 

31.6 

87.0 

Radius 

Distal  breadth 

11.7 

14.6 

80.0 

*Type  and  referred  specimens  from  Sharktooth  Hill 
**Specimens  from  Laguna  Niguel  (tibiotarsus  referred  D.  ?californica) 
***Type  tarsometatarsus,  referred  tibiotarsus 
****LACM  no.  Bi230 


but  slightly  rounded  in  contour;  internal  side  of  distal  end  relatively  short  in 
anconopalmar  dimension,  and  anconal  tip  swollen  laterally;  impression  of 
brachialis  anticus  small,  and  short  in  proximo-distal  dimension;  ectepicondylar 
process  situated  relatively  near  to  distal  end;  attachment  of  anterior  articular 
ligament  turned  slightly  laterally  rather  than  facing  directly  palmad. 

Measurements.  — Length  from  distal  end  to  distal  tip  of  deltoid  crest  67.0 
mm  (estimated  total  length  80  mm),  breadth  of  distal  condyles  7.7  mm,  depth  of 
internal  side  of  distal  end  8.4  mm,  distance  from  distal  surface  of  condyle  to 
proximal  edge  of  ectepicondylar  process  9.5  mm,  shaft  dimensions  near  distal 
end  3.5  mm  in  breadth,  5.7  mm  in  depth,  shaft  dimensions  (middle)  3.9  mm  in 
breadth,  5.9  mm  in  depth. 

Etymology.  — The  species  is  named  for  Lawrence  G.  Barnes  in  recogni- 
tion of  his  paleontological  studies  of  the  marine  vertebrates  of  the  west  coast. 

Discussion.  — The  holotype  of  P.  barnesi  is  comparable  in  general  size  to 
the  humerus  of  Puffinus  opisthomelas  Coues  1864.  Although  the  shaft  is  com- 
pressed laterally  as  in  that  Recent  species,  it  is  slightly  more  rounded  and  less 
bladelike  in  the  fossil. 

With  the  exception  of  Puffinus  tedfordi  Howard  1971,  from  the  Almejas 


1978 


Miocene  Marine  Birds 


9 


Formation  of  Cedros  Island,  Baja  California,  Mexico,  and  P.  arvernensis 
Milne-Edwards  1871,  from  the  Early  Miocene  of  France,  all  previously  de- 
scribed Tertiary  representatives  of  this  genus  are  known  from  the  humerus. 
Shufeldt  (1896)  referred  a humerus  to  P.  arvernensis,  but  according  to  Storrs 
Olson  (personal  communication),  who  has  examined  the  specimen,  it  comes 
from  a Pleistocene  locality  and  should  be  assigned  to  the  Recent  species  Puf- 
finus  puffinus  (Brunnich  1764).  The  holotypes  of  both/5,  tedfordi  and  P.  arver- 
nensis are  tarsometatarsi.  In  both  species,  this  element  suggests  a stouter  bird 
than  is  represented  by  the  wing  of  P.  barnesi. 

Judging  from  the  descriptions  given  by  Milne-Edwards  (1874),  the  type 
humeri  of  his  species  Puffinus  aquitanicus  and  P.  antiquus,  from  the  Middle 
Miocene  of  France,  both  exceed  P.  barnesi  in  size.  Also,  as  indicated  by  a cast 
of  the  type  of  P.  conradi  Marsh  1870  (LACM  C688),  that  species  was  markedly 
larger  than  P.  barnesi.  At  the  opposite  extreme,  Brodkorb’s  (1963a:  161)  meas- 
urements of  the  type  humerus  of  his  species/5,  micraulax,  from  the  Hawthorne 
Formation,  Early  Miocene  of  Florida,  show  that  species  to  be  notably  smaller 
than  P.  barnesi. 

Original  material  or  casts  of  all  the  California  species  of  Tertiary  Puffinus 
have  been  examined,  including  topotypical  specimens  of  humeri  referable  to  P. 
mitchelli  Miller  1961  (LACM  17500)  and  P.  priscus  Miller  1961  (LACM  17502 
and  LACM  18140)  recovered  since  the  last  report  on  the  avifauna  of  the  Mid- 
dle Miocene  of  Sharktooth  Hill  (Howard  1966b). 

Of  the  California  species,  the  humeri  of  P.felthami  Howard  1949  (Middle 
Pliocene  of  Orange  County)  and  P.  mitchelli  are  larger  than  P.  barnesi.  P. 
inceptor  Wetmore  1930  (Middle  Miocene,  Sharktooth  Hill)  agrees  in  some 
dimensions,  but  the  marked  medial  thrust  of  the  internal  condyle  and  the 
greater  anconopalmar  dimension  of  the  internal  side  of  the  distal  end  are  dis- 
tinctive characters  of  P.  inceptor.  Also,  the  brachial  impression  in  that  species 
is  “more  distally  developed.  In  P.  calhouni  Howard  1968  (Late  Miocene, 
Orange  County)  and  P.  priscus  the  shaft  is  more  compressed  and  bladelike 
than  in  P.  barnesi.  The  ratio  of  breadth  to  depth  of  shaft  near  the  distal  end  in 
P.  barnesi  is  61%,  in  P.  calhouni  50%,  and  in  P.  priscus  48-53%. 

An  excellent  relief  cast  (LACM  C692)  from  the  holotype  skeletal  impres- 
sion of  P.  diatomicus  Miller  1925  (Late  Miocene,  Lompoc)  clearly  reveals 
characters  of  the  palmar  aspect  of  the  distal  end  of  the  humerus.  The  impres- 
sion of  the  brachialis  anticus  is  more  distally  extended  than  in  P.  barnesi  and 
the  ectepicondylar  process  is  placed  higher  above  the  distal  end  (11.6  mm  from 
distal  surface  of  condyle  to  proximal  tip  of  process). 

Most  closely  approaching  P.  barnesi  in  general  size  are  the  paratype  and 
referred  humeri  of  P.  kanakoffi  Howard  1949  (LACM  specimens),  from  the 
San  Diego  Formation.  This  Pliocene  species  is  distinguished,  however,  by  a 
longer  brachial  impression,  less  rounded  shaft  (though  less  compressed  than  in 
P.  priscus),  less  inflated  anconal  tip  of  the  internal  condyle,  and  more  palmad- 
facing  attachment  for  the  anterior  articular  ligament. 

Referred  material.  — A left  ulna,  lacking  the  olecranon  (LACM  42654) 


10 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  290 


Figure  1.  A,  B,  Gavia  brodkorbi  n.  sp.  holotype  ulna,  LACM  31 173,  internal  and  palmar 
views.  C,  D,  Morus  lompocanus  Miller  referred  carpometacarpus,  LACM  77697 , inter- 
nal and  external  views.  E,  F,  Puffinus  barnesi  n.  sp.  holotype  humerus,  LACM  42652, 
palmar  and  internal  views.  X 1 


1978 


Miocene  Marine  Birds 


11 


Figure  2.  A and  D,  Diomedea  sp.  indet.,  proximal  portion  of  humerus,  LACM  58544, 
anconal  and  palmar  views.  B,  Diomedea  anglica  Lydekker,  referred  distal  end  of 
tibiotarsus  from  Pierce,  Florida,  MCZ  2328,  anterior  view.  C,  Diomedea  ?californica 
Miller,  referred  distal  end  of  tibiotarsus,  LACM  37629,  anterior  view.  X 1 


12 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  290 


Figure  3.  A and  D,  Osteodontornis  orri  Howard,  referred  proximal  half  of  left  car- 
pometacarpus,  LACM  53906,  posterior  and  internal  views.  B,  C,  Morns  magnus  n.  sp. 
holotype  carpometacarpus,  LACM  37632,  internal  and  external  views.  X 1 


1978 


Miocene  Marine  Birds 


13 


Figure  4.  A,  B,  Morus  magnus  n.  sp.,  referred  rostrum,  LACM  77696,  ventral  and 
dorsal  views,  C,  D,  Sulidae  sp.  indet.,  rostrum,  LACM  73565,  dorsal  and  ventral  views. 
X 1 


14 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  290 


from  the  type  locality,  LACM  6906.  Although  smaller  than  would  be  expected 
for  the  wing  of  the  same  individual  as  the  holotype,  this  specimen  (like  the 
humerus)  falls  within  the  size  range  ofP.  opisthomelas . (ulnar  length,  68.3-76.3 
mm),  though  near  the  minimum;  the  holotype  humerus  is  near  the  maximum 
size  ofP.  opisthomelas.  The  few  characters  discernible  in  the  poorly  preserved 
ulna  are:  carpal  process  as  in  P.  opisthomelas,  shorter  than  in  a topotype  ulna 
of  P.  kanakoffi  (LACM  2821,  previously  unreported),  and  more  abruptly  pro- 
jected; external  cotyla  not  prominently  projected  palmad;  ridge  present  from 
external  cotyla  to  shaft;  attachment  for  anterior  articular  ligament  seemingly 
more  protruding  then  in  P.  opisthomelas;  but  the  area  is  broken. 

Measurements  of  ulna:  length  to  intercotylar  ridge  70.8  mm,  breadth  of 
proximal  end  6.5  mm,  greatest  breadth  of  distal  end  6.4  mm,  depth  through 
external  crest  of  trochlea  5.3  mm,  shaft  dimensions  (middle)  3.5  mm  x 5.3  mm. 

Another  poorly  preserved  fragment  of  a distal  end  of  an  ulna  (LACM 
52748)  from  locality  LACM  7136,  has  a distal  breadth  of  approximately  6.3 
mm.  A wing  phalanx  (digit  2,  phalanx  1),  LACM  53925  from  locality  LACM 
3185,  measures  20.4  mm  in  length,  which  is  within  the  size  range  of  this  element 
of  P.  opisthomelas.  These  two  specimens  are  tentatively  assigned  to  P.  bar- 
nesi. 


Family  Hydrobatidae  — Storm  Petrels 
Genus  Oceanodroma  Reinchenbach  1852 
Oceanodroma  sp.  indeterminate 

Referred  material.  — A single  incomplete  right  tarsometatarus,  LACM 
42659,  from  locality  LACM  6902,  represents  this  family  and  genus. 

Discussion.  — The  specimen  resembles  this  element  in  O.  melania 
(Bonaparte  1854),  but  is  slightly  longer.  The  length  from  distal  end  to  proximal 
tip  of  hypotarsus  is  31.5  mm.  The  distal  end  appears  to  be  narrower  than  in  O. 
melania,  but  the  preservation  is  such  that  accurate  measurement  is  impossible. 

The  only  previously  recorded  Tertiary  storm  petrel  is  O.  hubbsi  Miller 
1951,  from  the  Capistrano  Formation  (Late  Miocene-Early  Pliocene),  Orange 
County,  a few  miles  south  of  the  Laguna  Niguel  localities.  The  tarsometatarsus 
is  represented  in  the  type,  partial  skeleton,  of  this  species  preserved  in  shale. 
Miller  (1951)  gives  the  length  of  this  element  as  22.4  mm,  markedly  less  than 
even  the  incomplete  measurement  possible  on  the  specimen  now  at  hand. 

Order  PELECANIFORMES 
Family  Pseudodontornithidae  — Bony-toothed  Birds 
Genus  Osteodontornis  Howard  1957 
Osteodontornis  orri  Howard  1957 
Figure  3 a,  d 

Referred  material.  — Lower  jaw  fragment,  LACM  22444,  and  car- 
pometarcarpus,  LACM  53906,  with  portion  of  proximal  end  and  shaft,  both 


1978 


Miocene  Marine  Birds 


15 


from  locality  LACM  6902;  portion  of  lower  jaw,  LACM  42656,  with  a single 
“tooth,”  from  locality  LACM  7136. 

Discussion.  — The  jaw  fragments  resemble  previously  recorded  speci- 
mens of  Osteodontornis  (Howard  1957a,  and  Howard  and  White  1962),  al- 
though they  seem  somewhat  smaller  than  the  type  of  O.  orri. 

The  fragment  of  carpometacarpus,  however,  conforms  in  size  to  the  left 
carpometacarpus  on  the  type  skeleton,  a cast  of  which  is  at  hand.  In  fact,  the 
specimen  from  locality  6902  fits  exactly  into  the  impression  of  the  left  car- 
pometarcarpus  on  type  Slab  No.  1 (LACM  C703,  Block  No.  1),  in  which  the 
large  pisiform  process  has  left  a deep  depression.  The  present  specimen  not 
only  clarifies  that  this  depression,  was,  indeed,  made  by  the  pisiform  process, 
but  also  reveals  other  characters  only  suggested  in  the  type,  namely,  the  length 
of  the  process  of  metacarpal  1 and  the  great  compression  of  metacarpal  3(M3) 
to  metacarpal  2(M2).  The  very  thin  M3  is  pressed  against  M2  even  distal  to  the 
proximal  metacarpal  symphysis,  and  the  symphysis  itself  extends  almost  to  the 
level  of  the  distal  tip  of  the  process  of  ML 

Metacarpal  1 is  broken  in  both  the  type  and  LACM  53906,  but  the  area  of 
its  attachment  to  the  element  as  a whole  is  indicated  in  the  type  and  clarified  in 
the  broken  edges  of  the  process  on  the  carpometacarpus  from  Laguna  Niguel. 
The  length  of  Ml  measured  on  LACM  53906,  is  62.2  mm,  approximately 
one-fourth  the  total  length  of  the  carpometacarpus  as  seen  in  the  type  (252 
mm).  Enough  of  the  proximal  end  of  LACM  53906  is  preserved  to  obtain  an 
approximate  breadth  of  the  proximal  trochlea  (15.2  mm).  The  antero-posterior 
dimension  of  the  trochlea  cannot  be  measured,  but  it  is  obvious  that  the  post- 
erior portion  is  short  in  distal  extent.  Shaft  breadths  of  M2  and  M3  are  1 1 .0  mm 
and  4.0  mm  respectively.  The  depth  through  the  compressed  M2  and  M3  is 
16.4  mm.  The  incomplete  specimen  measures  126.4  mm  from  trochlea  to  bro- 
ken end  of  M2. 

Except  for  a prominent  pneumatic  foramen  above  the  pisiform  process, 
which  occurs  in  most  sulids,  there  is  nothing  about  this  highly  compressed 
carpometacarpus  to  relate  it  to  the  Pelecaniformes.  I have  previously  con- 
tended (Howard  1957a)  that  the  bony-toothed  birds  represent  a distinct  order, 
Odontopterigiformes. 

Family  Sulidae  — Boobies  and  Gannets 

The  family  Sulidae  is  the  best  represented  family  in  the  Laguna  Niguel 
collection  and  the  one  which  has  presented  the  greatest  difficulty  in  identifica- 
tion. Fifteen  middle  and  late  Tertiary  sulids  have  been  previously  described 
from  North  America  and  Europe  (see  Brodkorb  1 963b:257-26 1 ),  eight  of  which 
are  from  California  (six  Miocene,  two  Pliocene).  Five  of  the  species  are  based 
on  partial  skeletons  in  shale  slabs,  the  others  on  individual  bones  involving  four 
different  incomplete  skeletal  elements.  A complete  review  of  the  known  fossils 
of  this  family  is  greatly  to  be  desired.  This  is  a task  that  some  energetic  young 
paleontologist  may  profitably  undertake. 


16 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  290 


Sixteen  bones  in  the  present  collection  are  assignable  to  at  least  three 
species.  In  spite  of  the  difficulty  experienced  in  correlating  the  previously 
described  species,  I feel  justified  in  describing  one  new  species  and  in  assigning 
several  specimens  to  one  previously  described. 

Genus  Morus  Viellot  1816 
Morns  lompocanus  (Miller  1925) 

Figure  1 c,  d 

Referred  material.  — Carpometarcarpus,  LACM  37634;  distal  end  of 
ulna,  LACM  37636;  and  distal  end  of  femur,  LACM  37633;  all  from  locality 
LACM  6902;  carpometacarpus,  LACM  77697,  from  locality  6901;  proximal 
end  of  tarsometatarsus,  LACM  32428  from  locality  LACM  6906;  proximal  end 
of  tarsometatarsus,  LACM  42657,  from  locality  LACM  7136;  distal  end  of 
tibiotarsus,  LACM  52217,  from  locality  LACM  3185. 

Discussion.  — Morus  lompocanus  was  described  (Miller  1925)  from  the 
impression  of  a partial  skeleton  in  a slab  of  diatomaceous  shale  from  Lompoc, 
California.  Although  the  holotype  (UCMP  26544)  was  the  only  specimen  de- 
scribed in  the  text,  two  other  partial  skeletons  from  the  same  site  were  so 
named  and  illustrated  (op.  cit.:pl.  7B  and  pi.  9).  These  referred  specimens 
(UCMP  117309  and  UCMP  115855),  both  bearing  Miller’s  identification,  as 
well  as  a cast  (in  relief)  of  the  holotype  (LACM  C697)  are  at  hand.  On  the  basis 
of  comparison  of  size  with  these  specimens,  the  fossils  from  Laguna  Niguel  are 
referred  to  M.  lompocanus. 

The  two  carpometacarpi  measure  94.7  mm  (LACM  37634)  and  95.7  mm 
(LACM  77697)  in  length.  By  comparison,  a carpometacarpus  (LACM  Bi  1764) 
of  a female  M.  bassanus  (Linnaeus  1758)  is  90.0  mm,  and  Miller  (1935:78) 
records  another  of  this  Recent  species  at  94  mm.  The  referred  carpometacar- 
pus of  M.  lompocanus  (UCMP  115855)  is  96.6  mm.  Other  fossil  sulids  in  which 
this  dimension  is  known  are:  Palaeosula  stocktoni  (Miller  1935),  102  mm; 
Miosula  media  Miller  1925,  81  mm;  Sula  willetti  Miller  1925,  70  mm;  S.  pohli 
Howard  1958,  69  mm;  Microsula  avita  (Wetmore  1938),  75  mm. 

Carpometacarpus  LACM  77697,  the  better  preserved  of  the  two  Laguna 
Niguel  carpometacarpi  (Fig.  1 C,  D),  is  similar  in  the  shape  of  the  process  of 
Ml  to  Morus  bassanus.  But  where  the  small  foramina  occur  in  the  modern 
species,  there  is  a deep,  slit-like  foramen  — one  anterior  to  the  pisiform  pro- 
cess, and  one  in  a similar  position  at  the  base  of  Ml  on  the  external  side  of  the 
proximal  end.  The  fossil  also  resembles  Morus  in  the  absence  of  pneumatic 
foramina  at  the  posterior  edge  of  the  trochlea.  Details  of  qualitative  characters 
are  not  discernible  on  the  Lompoc  specimens. 

Ulna  LACM  37636  resemble  Morus  rather  than  Sula  in  the  pneumaticity 
of  the  palmar  face  of  the  carpal  process,  and  the  size  of  the  process.  It  is  of  the 
same  distal  breadth  (10.5  mm)  as  the  ulna  of  M.  bassanus  LACM  Bi  1764. 
Measurements  of  ulnar  breadth  cannot  be  made  on  M.  lompocanus,  but  the 
Laguna  Niguel  specimen  corresponds  favorably  with  the  impression  of  the 
element  on  Lompoc  specimen  UCMP  115855. 


1978 


Miocene  Marine  Birds 


17 


Femur  LACM  37633  conforms  in  proportions  to  a raised  mold  of  the 
element  made  from  the  type  impression  of  M.  lompocanus.  Similar  dimensions 
measured  on  the  two  specimens  are  identical:  breadth  across  anterior  face  of 
distal  end  13.9  mm,  breadth  of  shaft  7.0  mm.  M.  bassanus  LACM  Bi  1764  is 
larger  in  these  dimensions  (14.2  mm  and  7.5  mm,  respectively). 

Tibiotarsus  LACM  52217  conforms  in  size  withM.  lompocanus  specimen 
UCMP  1 15855  from  Lompoc.  The  bridge  is  less  vertical  in  position  than  in  M. 
bassanus,  the  upper  edge  being  tipped  posteriorly.  This  is  true,  as  well,  of  the 
type  tibiotarsus  of  Miosula  recentior  Howard  1949  (LACM  2117)  from  the 
Pliocene  of  San  Diego,  California.  But  the  latter  is  distinguished  from  the 
specimen  now  at  hand  by  less  vertically  oriented  condyles.  Measurements  of 
LACM  52217  are:  breadth  of  distal  end  13.7  mm,  depth  of  distal  end  12.4  mm, 
ratio  of  depth  to  breath  90.5%.  The  same  dimensions  in  M.  bassanus  LACM  Bi 
1764  are,  breadth  13.0  mm,  depth  12.0  mm,  ratio  depth  to  breadth  92%. 

The  two  proximal  ends  of  tarsometatarsi  (LACM  32428  and  LACM 
42657)  measure  12.8  mm  and  12.9  mm  in  proximal  breadth,  respectively.  A 
mold  of  the  posterior  surface  of  this  element  on  the  type  specimen  of  M. 
lompocanus  measures  12.8  mm  proximally.  The  impression  visible  on  Lompoc 
specimen  UCMP  115855  measures  13.5  mm.  M.  bassanus  and  a mold  of  the 
tarsometatarsus  in  the  type  of  Miosula  media  Miller  1925  are  broader  (14.5  mm 
and  14.1  mm,  respectively). 

Morus  magnus  new  species 
Figure  3 b,  c;  4 a,  b 

Holotype.  — Nearly  complete  left  carpometacarpus,  LACM  37632,  col- 
lected by  Marion  J.  Bohreer,  1969,  from  LACM  locality  6906. 

Diagnosis.  — More  than  20%  longer  than  female  specimens  of  this  ele- 
ment of  Morus  bassanus.  Area  above  pisiform  process  depressed,  with  small 
pneumatic  orifice.  Externally,  a deep,  slit-like  depression  at  base  of  process  of 
metacarpal  1. 

Measurements.  — Greatest  length  116.1  mm,  breadth  proximal  trochlea 
11  mm  (approximately),  breadth  of  shaft  9.6  mm. 

Etymology . — The  species  name  magnus  (Latin,  great)  refers  to  the  large 
size  of  the  skeletal  elements  described. 

Discussion.  — Owing  to  the  poor  preservation  of  the  holotype  car- 
pometacarpus, size  is  the  outstanding  distinguishing  character.  Of  previously 
described  sulids,  Palaeosula  stocktoni  most  nearly  approaches  M.  magnus  in 
length  of  this  element  (102  mm),  but  is  still  13%  shorter.  Characters  of  the 
carpometacarpus  other  than  length  are  not  clearly  discernible  on  the  type  slab 
of  P.  stocktoni  (cast,  LACM  C743).  It  has  been  shown,  however  (Howard 
1958),  that  at  least  the  humerus  of  Palaeosula  is  markedly  distinct  qualitatively 
from  either  Morus  or  Sula.  M.  magnus , on  the  other  hand,  resembles  the  living 
sulids. 

From  the  elements  known,  none  of  the  other  middle  to  late  Tertiary  fossil 
sulids  gives  evidence  of  approaching  M.  magnus  in  size. 


18 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  290 


Referred  material.  — Distal  end  of  humerus,  LACM  32430,  and  shaft  of 
femur,  LACM  37628,  both  from  the  type  locality,  LACM  6906,  collected  by 
Bohreer  in  1969;  and  rostrum,  LACM  77696,  from  locality  LACM  6902,  col- 
lected by  Jennifer  Whistler,  June,  1975. 

The  humerus  resembles  Morus  in  contrast  to  Sula  in  the  absence  of  the 
deep  pneumatic  foramen  undercutting  the  external  side  of  the  olecranal  fossa. 
The  flat  surface  of  the  attachment  for  the  anterior  articular  ligament,  and  its 
length  relative  to  the  distal  breadth  of  the  element  is  also  similar  to  Morus.  The 
attachment,  however,  projects  slightly  more  palmad  at  its  proximal  end  than  in 
M.  bassanus,  and,  in  this  respect,  resembles  Sula.  In  breadth  the  element  is 
22%  greater  than  in  M.  bassanus. 

The  fragmentary  femur  is  18%  broader  than  in  M.  bassanus  in  least 
breadth  of  shaft,  and  appears  to  expand  to  even  greater  relative  breadth  farther 
distad.  It  is  difficult  to  be  certain  of  accurately  reproducing  the  same  measure- 
ment in  the  two  specimens  as  the  distal  condyles  are  lacking  in  the  fossil. 

The  rostrum  resembles  Sula  in  the  broad  arch  of  the  nasals,  but  bears 
resemblance  to  Morus  in  the  depression  of  the  dorsal  contour  anterior  to  the 
hinge.  This  depressed  area,  however,  is  shorter  than  in  M.  bassanus.  In 
greatest  breadth,  it  exceeds  the  rostrum  of  M.  bassanus  by  31%  (see  Table  2). 

?Miosula  media  Miller  1925 

Referred  material.  — Tarsometatarsus  lacking  the  proximal  end,  LACM 
32431,  from  locality  LACM  6906. 

Discussion.  — This  specimen  is  heavier  of  shaft  than  the  two  proximal 
fragments  of  tarsometatarsus  referred  to  Morus  lompocanus.  In  breadth  of 
distal  end  (17.6  mm)  it  is  slightly  larger  than  an  incomplete  mold  of  the  tar- 
sometatarsus made  from  the  type  skeletal  impression  of  Miosula  media  (17.3 
mm,  approx.).  Although  neither  the  mold  nor  LACM  32431  is  complete,  both 
suggest  a tarsometatsus  that  is  straighter  of  shaft  than  in  Morus,  but  having  the 
slightly  raised  internal  trochlea  characteristic  of  that  genus  as  distinguished 
from  Sula. 


SULIDAE,  Spp.  INDETERMINATE 

Referred  material.  — A rostrum,  LACM  73565,  a proximal  end  of  radius, 
LACM  58551,  and  a distal  end  of  tibiotarsus,  LACM  57834,  all  from  locality 
LACM  6902;  and  a rostrum,  LACM  37614,  from  locality  LACM  6906. 

Discussion.  — Rostrum  LACM  73565  (Fig.  4 C,  D)  bears  strong  re- 
semblance to  the  cormorants  in  dorsal  aspect,  having  deep  lateral  grooves 
setting  off  a narrow  nasal  process.  There  are,  however,  no  dorsal  foramina 
such  as  occur  in  Phalacrocorax.  In  palatal  view,  the  resemblance  is  closer  to 
the  sulids.  The  palatines  in  the  maxillo-palatine  area  are  swollen,  not  flat,  and 
are  bordered  laterally  with  wide,  deep  grooves.  Posteriorly  the  maxillo- 
palatine  area  slants  smoothly  upward  and  bears  very  little  perforation.  In  the 
slope  of  the  area  the  specimen  resembles  Morus,  in  perforation  it  resembles 


1978 


Miocene  Marine  Birds 


19 


TABLE  2 

Measurements  (in  millimeters)  of  Morus  magnus  and  M.  bassanus 

M.  magnus  M.  bassanus 

(LACM  Bi  1764) 


Carpometacarpus 


Greatest  length 

116.1 

90.0 

Breadth  proximal  trochlea 

1 1 .0  approx. 

9.9 

Breadth  middle  of  shaft 

9.6 

7.4 

Height  process  Ml 

16.0 

12.0 

Humerus 

Greatest  breadth  distal  end 

29.2 

24.1 

Depth  distal  end  (externally) 

17.0 

14.4 

Breadth  of  shaft  immediately 
proximal  to  attachment  for 

anterior  articular  ligament 

22.8 

17.0 

Femur 

Least  breadth  shaft 

8.9 

7.1 

Depth  of  shaft 

9.6 

7.5 

Rostrum 

Breadth  of  frontonasal  hinge 

34.8 

25.4-26.5* 

Greatest  depth 

25.3 

15.4-16.7* 

Breadth  nasal  process 

31.4 

18.3-19.5* 

Length 

138.0  (estimate) 

101 .7-106.5 

*Maximum  measurements  from  rostrum  PB  16291,  minimum  from  LACM  Bi  1765. 


both  Phalacrocorax  and  Moms,  but  not  Sulci.  This  area  in  Sula  rises  more 
abruptly  and  is  well  perforated.  The  lateral  pneumatic  openings  are  much 
reduced  in  comparison  to  those  found  in  the  cormorants,  and  compare  more 
favorably  with  those  of  Moms.  Measurements  of  LACM  73565:  greatest 
breadth  22.2  mm  (approximately),  greatest  depth,  15:1  mm,  breadth  nasal  pro- 
cess 5.2  mm. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  Miller  (1925)  noted  certain  characteristics  of 
Miosula  media  that  are  cormorant-like,  it  is  possible  that  this  rostrum  may 
represent  that  species. 

The  second  rostrum  (LACM  37614)  is  typically  sulid  in  all  aspects.  It  is 
more  massive  than  LACM  73565,  but  smaller  than  LACM  77696  referred  to 
Moms  magnus.  Measurements:  greatest  breadth  24.0  mm,  greatest  depth  19.2 
mm,  breadth  nasal  process  21.8  mm. 


20 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  290 


The  radius  resembles  Morns  bass  anus  in  general  conformation  and  size, 
but  is  poorly  preserved.  The  tibiotarsus  is  similar  in  characters  of  the  distal  end 
to  LACM  52217  from  Laguna  Niguel,  assigned  to  Moms  lompocanus.  The 
specimen  is  eroded  so  that  measurements  cannot  be  made  precisely.  It  ap- 
pears, however,  to  be  narrower  but  relatively  deeper  than  in  LACM  52217, 
breadth  of  distal  end  12.0  mm  (approx.),  depth  of  distal  end  1 1 .5  mm  (approx.); 
ratio  of  depth  to  breadth  96%. 

Order  CHARADRIIFORMES 
Family  Alcidae  — Auklike  Birds 

Discussion.  — In  addition  to  the  six  bones  of  Praemancalla  wetmorei 
(subfamily  Mancallinae)  described  earlier  (Howard  1976)  from  localities 
LACM  6902,  6906  and  3185,  the  alcids  from  Laguna  Niguel  are  represented  by 
five  fragments  assignable  to  the  Alcinae.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  comprehen- 
sive studies  of  Tertiary  alcids  are  under  way  by  Storrs  Olson  at  the  United 
States  National  Museum  of  Natural  History  (Atlantic  avifauna)  and  G.  Victor 
Morejohn  at  California  State  University,  San  Jose  (Pacific  avifauna),  I have 
refrained  from  attempting  to  name  these  poorly  preserved  specimens. 

Five  middle  to  late  Tertiary  alcines  have  been  previously  described  from 
the  west  coast:  Aethia  rossmoori  Howard  1968,  and  Cerorhinca  dubia  Miller 
1925,  from  the  Late  Miocene;  Brachyramphus  pliocenus  Howard  1949, 
Ptychoramphus  tenuis  Miller  and  Bowman  1958,  and  Cerorhinca  minor  How- 
ard 1971,  from  the  Middle  to  Late  Pliocene.  East  coast  species  are  Uria  anti- 
qua  (Marsh  1870),  and  Miocepphus  mcclungi  Wetmore  1940,  from  the  Middle 
Miocene;  and  Australca  grandis  Brodkorb  1955,  from  the  Middle  Pliocene.  A 
single  species,  Uria  ausonia  Portis  1887,  is  recorded  from  the  Middle  Pliocene 
of  Italy  (see  Brodkorb  1967;  and  Howard  1968  and  1971).  There  is  no  indication 
that  any  of  these  species  is  represented  by  the  material  from  the  Laguna  Niguel 
sites. 

Genus  Uria  Brisson  1760 
?Uria  sp. 

Referred  material.  — An  incomplete  proximal  end  of  humerus,  LACM 
52018,  from  locality  LACM  6902. 

Discussion.  — This  poorly  preserved  specimen  resembles  the  humerus  in 
the  murres  in  the  long,  oval  pectoral  scar,  and  prominent  head  widening  to- 
wards the  internal  side  and  overhanging  a broadly  depressed  tricipital  area 
between  the  pectoral  scar  and  the  internal  tuberosity.  Both  the  deltoid  and  the 
bicipital  crests  are  incomplete.  That  which  remains  of  the  bicipital  surface  is 
prominently  raised  proximally  and  bordered  medially  below  by  a deep  groove; 
the  bicipital  furrow  is  a deep  notch.  These  characters  are  most  closely  matched 
by  humeri  of  Recent  U.  lomvia  (Linnaeus  1758). 

Comparisons  were  made  with  a cast  of  the  type  of  Uria  antiqua,  provided 
through  the  courtesy  of  Storrs  Olson,  United  States  National  Museum  of 


1978 


Miocene  Marine  Birds 


21 


Natural  History.  Olson  (personal  correspondence)  now  refers  this  species  to 
the  genus  Australca  Brodkorb  1965.  The  cast  is  not  only  larger,  but  is  much 
flatter  in  the  bicipital  area  than  in  the  Laguna  Niguel  specimen. 


Genus  Cepphus  Pallas  1769 
?Cepphus  sp. 

Referred  material.  — A proximal  end  of  ulna  with  incomplete  olecranon, 
LACM  47045,  from  locality  LACM  6906. 

Discussion.  — This  specimen  resembles  the  ulna  of  the  Pigeon  Guillemot, 
Cepphus  columba  Pallas  1811,  in  the  rounded  shaft  lacking  a distinct  keel 
anconally,  and  in  having  the  brachial  impression  bordering  the  attachment  for 
the  anterior  articular  ligament  and  extending  farther  proximally  than  in  most 
other  genera  of  alcines.  However,  the  brachial  impression  is  broader  in  the 
fossil,  and  more  deeply  undercuts  the  attachment  for  the  anterior  articular 
ligament  than  in  the  Recent  species.  Also  the  attachment  for  the  ligament  is 
more  prominent  and  more  square  in  outline. 

The  possibility  that  this  specimen  might  represent  the  genus  Miocepphus 
prompted  me  to  contact  Storrs  Olson.  He  reports  (personal  correspondence) 
that  “ Miocepphus  mcclungi  is  one  of  the  commoner  birds  in  the  Calvert  For- 
mation of  Maryland  and  Virginia  and  I have  many  specimens  that  have  not 
been  reported  on  in  the  literature.”  He  provided  me  with  the  loan  of  a complete 
ulna  and  humerus  which  he  said  “certainly  pertain  to  this  species.”  In  the  ulna 
(USNM  237219)  the  attachment  for  the  anterior  articular  ligament  is  less  prom- 
inent and  more  elongated  than  in  LACM  47045,  the  brachial  impression  is 
narrower,  and  the  shaft  more  compressed.  LACM  47045  is  not  related  to 
Miocepphus,  which  accords  with  Olson’s  observation  that  ” Miocepphus  is  not 
related0  to  Cepphus ” but  to  the  “ Alca-Uria  group  of  Atlantic  alcids.” 


Genus  Aethia  Merrem  1788 
?Aethia  sp. 

Referred  material.  — Incomplete  humerus,  LACM  37686,  from  locality 
LACM  6906. 

Discussion.  — LACM  37686  is  the  smallest  of  the  alcine  bones  from 
Laguna  Niguel.  It  is  possibly  related  to  the  Auklet,  Aethia  rossmoori  Howard 
1968,  described  from  an  ulna  (LACM  18948)  with  referred  distal  end  of 
humerus  (LACM  18949),  collected  in  the  Monterey  Formation  at  Leisure 
World  in  nearby  Laguna  Hills  (locality  LACM  1945).  LACM  37686  resembles 
the  humerus  of  A.  rossmoori  in  the  rounded  shaft,  position  of  the  brachial 
impression  with  slight  rise  bordering  it  externally,  and  attachment  of  the  an- 
terior articular  ligament  facing  more  palmad  than  laterally.  It  is,  however,  15% 
larger  than  the  specimen  of  A.  rossmoori.  Also,  although  the  area  of  the  tricipi- 
tal  grooves  is  abraded,  the  grooves  appear  to  be  less  deeply  incised  than  in 
modern  species  of  Aethia,  or  A.  rossmoori. 


22 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  290 


Tribe  Fraterculini 
Genus  and  species  indeterminate 

Referred  material.  — Proximal  end  of  humerus,  LACM  42658,  from  lo- 
cality LACM  7136,  and  distal  end  of  humerus,  LACM  37638,  from  locality 
LACM  6902. 

Discussion.  — Both  humeral  fragments  resemble  this  element  in  the  puf- 
fins (following  Storer  1960:698,  in  segregating  Cerorhinca  in  a tribe  along  with 
Fratercula  and  Lunda).  The  proximal  portion  (LACM  42658)  resembles  the 
type  humerus  of  Cerorhinca  minor  Howard  1971  (LACM  15408),  from  the 
Pliocene  of  Baja  California,  Mexico,  in  the  presence  of  a ridge  from  the  head  to 
the  median  crest,  forming  an  internal  border  to  the  tricipital  depression  on  the 
anconal  surface  below  the  head,  and  in  the  extension  of  the  median  crest  to  the 
border  of  the  bicipital  crest.  In  proximal  breadth  the  Laguna  Niguel  specimen 
is  12.0  mm,  which  is  markedly  larger  than  this  dimension  in  C.  minor  (10.5 
mm).  It  is,  in  fact,  closer  in  size  to  a humerus  (LACM  Bi  696)  of  Lunda 
cirrhata  (Pallas  1769)  which  measures  12.2  mm  in  proximal  breadth.  Similarity 
to  Lunda  is  seen  in  the  extension  of  the  pectoral  attachment  to  the  deepest  part 
of  the  head,  and,  on  the  palmar  side,  the  slight  inset  of  the  bicipital  surface 
border  from  that  of  the  bicipital  crest.  Similarity  to  Fratercula  corniculata 
(Naumann  1821)  is  noted  in  the  length  of  the  bicipital  surface,  which  becomes 
slightly  pointed  at  its  distal  extreme.  The  tricipital  depression  below  the  head  is 
shallower  than  in  any  of  the  specimens  of  Recent  puffins  at  hand. 

The  distal  portion  of  humerus  (LACM  36738)  also  resembles  this  element 
in  the  Fraterculini.  Its  size  suggests  that  it  may  belong  to  the  same  species  as 
the  proximal  end  discussed  above. 

The  possiblity  that  these  two  bones  might  be  assignable  to  Cerorhinca 
dubia,  described  from  the  Late  Miocene  of  Lompoc,  was  considered.  How- 
ever, their  size  seems  to  preclude  this  possibility.  Miller  (1925:116)  gave  the 
measurements  of  length  for  the  type  leg  bones  of  C.  dubia  as  60  mm  (tibiotar- 
sus)  and  29  mm  (tarsometatarsus).  These  measurements  in  a series  of  ten 
specimens  of  C.  monocerata  (Pallas  1811)  are  59.2  mm-60.0  mm,  mean  62.9 
mm  (tibiotarsus),  and  27.7  mm-30.6  mm,  mean  29.1  mm  (tarsometatarsus).  The 
humeri  from  Laguna  Niguel  are  relatively  larger  in  comparison  with  the  same 
series  of  skeletons  of  C.  monocerata:  proximal  breadth  (LACM  42658)  12.0 
mm  (C.  monocerata  6.9  mm-11.3  mm,  mean  10.6  mm);  distal  breadth  (LACM 
36738)  8.0  mm  (C.  monocerata  6.9  mm-7.8  mm,  mean  7.2  mm). 

Genus  Praemancalla  Howard  1976 
Praemancalla  wetmorei  Howard  1976 

No  further  material  referable  to  this  species  has  been  found  at  Laguna 
Niguel  since  the  type  description,  which  included:  holotype  humerus,  LACM 
42653,  paratype  ulna,  LACM  32429,  and  referred  proximal  end  of  humerus, 
LACM  32432,  all  from  locality  LACM  6906;  complete  radius,  LACM  53907, 


1978 


Miocene  Marine  Birds 


23 


and  scapular  end  of  coracoid,  LACM  37637,  both  from  locality  LACM  6902; 
and  proximal  section  of  carpometacarpus,  LACM  52216,  from  locality  LACM 
3185. 


CONCLUSIONS 

Seven  families  of  marine  birds  are  represented  by  the  39  identifiable  avian 
bones  from  the  Late  Miocene  deposits  in  Laguna  Niguel.  In  the  following  list 
the  numbers  in  parentheses  indicate  the  number  of  specimens  assigned  to  each 
species. 

Gaviidae  — Loons 

Gavia  brodkorbi  new  sp.  (1) 

Diomedeidae  — Albatrosses 
Diomedea  ? calif ornica  (1) 

Diomedea  sp.  indet.  (2) 

Procellariidae  — Shearwaters 
Puffinus  barnesi  new  sp.  (4) 

Hydrobatidae  — Storm  Petrels 
Oceanodroma  sp.  indet.  (1) 

Pseudodontornithidae  — Extinct  Bony-toothed  Birds 
Osteodontornis  orri  (3) 

Sulidae  — Boobies  and  Gannets 
Morns  lompocanus  (7) 

Morns  magnns  new  sp.  (4) 

?Miosnla  media  (1) 

Sulidae,  spp.  indet.  (4) 

Alcidae  — Auklike  Birds 
?Uria  sp.  (1) 

?Cepphns  sp.  (1) 

?Aethia  sp.  (1) 

Fraterculini,  gen.  and  sp.  indet.  (2) 

Praemancalla  wetmorei  (6) 

Five  of  the  above  families  (Diomedeidae,  Procellariidae,  Pseudodontor- 
nithidae, Sulidae  and  Alcidae)  are  also  represented  in  the  larger  collection  of 
Late  Miocene  birds  recovered  earlier  from  locality  LACM  1945  in  Leisure 
World,  Laguna  Hills,  about  three  miles  north  of  Laguna  Niguel  (Howard 
1968).  However,  few  of  the  same  species  are  listed  from  the  two  sites  and  none 
of  those  described  as  new  from  locality  LACM  1945  is  found  in  the  Laguna 
Niguel  area.  From  locality  LACM  1945,  50%  of  the  120  bones  identified  are  of 
the  Procellariidae  (4  species),  with  Sulidae  (3  species)  and  Alcidae  (5  species) 
constituting  approximately  22%  each.  The  remaining  6%  include  the  Anatidae 
(2  species),  Diomedeidae  (2  species)  and  ? Osteodontornis  orri. 

At  Laguna  Niguel  only  10%  of  the  39  identified  bones  are  procellariid  (1 


24 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  290 


species).  The  Sulidae  are  most  abundant,  making  up  41%,  followed  by  the 
Alcidae  28%.  Diomedea  and  Osteodontornis  constituting  1Vi%  each,  are  rela- 
tively better  represented  than  at  locality  LACM  1945.  A loon  (Gaviidae)  and  a 
storm  petrel  (Hydrobatidae),  not  present  at  LACM  1945,  complete  the  av- 
ifauna. The  Anatidae  are  not  represented. 

Although  the  deposits  at  both  of  these  sites  are  in  the  Monterey  Formation 
of  Late  Miocene  (Clarendonian  correlative)  age,  comparison  of  the  two  av- 
ifaunas strengthens  the  belief  suggested  by  a comparison  of  the  mancalline 
auks  (Howard  1976)  that  the  fauna  from  Laguna  Niguel  represents  a slightly 
later  time  than  that  from  locality  LACM  1945.  Not  only  is  the  mancalline  auk, 
Praemancalla  wetmorei,  from  Laguna  Niguel  further  specialized  for  wing- 
propelled  diving  than  is  P.  lagunensis  from  locality  LACM  1945,  but  in  the 
Laguna  Niguel  sites  there  is  less  indication  of  persistence  of  Middle  Miocene 
species  and  a more  definite  representation  of  typical  Late  Miocene  species.  At 
locality  LACM  1945,  Presbychen  abcivus  Wetmore  1930  and  Puffinus  priscus, 
both  described  from  the  Middle  Miocene  Sharktooth  Hill  Bonebed,  are  listed. 
Neither  has  been  found  at  Laguna  Niguel,  although  another  species,  Diomedea 
calif ornica,  described  from  the  same  locality,  is  tentatively  identified.  On  the 
other  hand  the  typically  Late  Miocene  Moms  lompocanus,  which  is  only  tenta- 
tively identified  at  locality  LACM  1945,  is  the  most  abundant  species  at 
Laguna  Niguel.  Osteodontornis  orri,  tentatively  listed  from  LACM  1945,  on 
the  basis  of  a single  fragment,  is  definitely  present  at  Laguna  Niguel. 

Some  significance  also  may  be  attached  to  the  occurrence  of  Gavia  and 
Oceanodroma  at  Laguna  Niguel.  This  is  the  first  Miocene  west  coast  occurr- 
ence of  the  loons  (Gaviidae).  The  only  previous  record  for  Oceanodroma  is  O. 
hubbsi  Miller  in  the  Capistrano  Formation,  which  is  now  considered  to  be  of 
latest  Miocene  to  early  Pliocene  (Hemphillian  correlative)  age  (Fife  1974:19) 
rather  than  Middle  Miocene  as  interpreted  by  Miller  (1951). 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

Had  it  not  been  for  the  generosity  of  the  North  American  Rockwell  Land 
Corporation  (NARLAND),  this  study  would  not  have  been  possible.  Their 
permission,  even  encouragement,  to  collect  during  their  1969  construction 
project,  and  since  then,  to  collect  and  quarry  in  adjacent  hillsides  on  NAR- 
LAND property,  has  resulted  in  amassing  the  present  excellent  representation 
of  Late  Miocene  fossils.  I am  also  grateful  to  Mrs.  Louise  Hanson  for  granting 
permission  to  collect  on  the  Moulton  Ranch  adjacent  to  NARLAND  property. 

My  thanks  are  extended  to  the  following  persons  who  have  contributed 
fossils  for  this  study:  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Marion  J.  Bohreer  and  family,  Mr.  Paul  R. 
Kirkland,  Mrs.  Janet  Price  and  family,  Mr.  W.  Earl  Calhoun,  Mr.  Rodney 
Raschke,  and  Miss  Jennifer  Whistler. 

I am  grateful  to  Dr.  Pierce  Brodkorb  of  the  University  of  Florida  and  Dr. 
Storrs  Olson  of  the  United  States  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  for 
consultation  and  for  the  loan  of  material  for  comparison;  and  to  Dr.  J.  Howard 


1978 


Miocene  Marine  Birds 


25 


Hutchison,  Museum  of  Paleontology,  University  of  California,  Berkeley  for 
the  loan  of  comparative  fossil  material  and  permission  to  cast  it.  Others  who 
have  contributed  comparative  material  are:  Dr.  Everett  C.  Olson,  University 
of  California  at  Los  Angeles;  Dr.  Raymond  A.  Paynter,  Jr.,  Museum  of  Com- 
parative Zoology,  Harvard  University;  Dr.  Stuart  Warter,  California  State 
University,  Long  Beach;  and  the  staff  of  the  Museum  of  Vertebrate  Zoology, 
University  of  California,  Berkeley. 

I am  continually  indebted  to  the  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County  for  the  opportunity  to  work  with  the  Museum’s  collections,  and  to  the 
Paleontology  staff,  in  particular,  for  their  cooperation.  In  the  present  study. 
Dr.  Lawrence  G.  Barnes,  who  was  in  charge  of  some  of  the  Museum’s  excava- 
tions at  Laguna  Niguel,  has  been  a constant  source  of  information  and  consul- 
tation. Others  to  whom  I am  grateful  for  assistance  in  many  ways  are:  Dr. 
Theodore  Downs,  Dr.  David  Whistler,  Robert  McKenzie,  andMichael  Ham- 
mer. The  photographs  were  made  by  Lawrence  Reynolds,  Museum  Photo- 
grapher. The  figures  were  prepared  by  Mary  Butler,  Graphic  Artist  at  LACM. 

The  curation  of  this  material  was  made  possible  under  National  Science 
Loundation  Grant  DEB  7202014,  to  the  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los 
Angeles  County  Loundation. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Brodkorb,  P.  1953.  A review  of  the  Pliocene  loons.  Condor,  55:211-214. 

1963a.  Miocene  birds  from  the  Hawthorne  Formation.  Quart.  Jour.  Florida 

Acad.  Sci.,  26:159-167. 

1963b.  Catalogue  of  Fossil  Birds,  Part  1 (Archaeopterygiformes  through  Ar- 

deiformes).  Bull.  Florida  State  Mus.  Biol.  Sci.,  7:179-293. 

1967.  Catalogue  of  Fossil  Birds,  Part  3 (Ralliformes,  Ichthyomithiformes, 

Charadriiformes).  Bull.  Florida  State  Mus.  Biol.  Sci.,  11:99-220. 

Fife,  D.L.  1974.  Geology  of  the  south  half  of  the  El  Toro  Quadrangle,  Orange  County, 
California.  California  Div.  Mines  and  Geol.  Spec.  Rep.  110:1-27. 

Howard,  H.  1957a.  A gigantic  “toothed”  marine  bird  from  the  Miocene  of  California. 
Santa  Barbara  Mus.  Nat.  Hist.  Bull.  Dept.  Geol.,  1:1-23. 

1957b.  A new  species  of  passerine  bird  from  the  Miocene  of  California.  Los 

Angeles  Co.  Mus.  Contrib.  Sci.  No.  9:1-16. 

1958.  Miocene  sulids  of  Southern  California.  Los  Angeles  Co.  Mus.  Contrib. 

Sci.  No.  25:1-15. 

1966a.  A possible  ancestor  of  the  Lucas  Auk  (Family  Mancallidae)  from  the 

Tertiary  of  Orange  County,  California.  Los  Angeles  Co.  Mus.  Contrib.  Sci.  No. 
101:1-8. 

1966b.  Additional  avian  records  from  the  Miocene  of  Sharktooth  Hill,  Califor- 
nia. Los  Angeles  Co.  Mus.  Contrib.  Sci.  No.  114:1-11. 

1968.  Tertiary  birds  from  Laguna  Hills,  Orange  County,  California.  Los 

Angeles  Co.  Mus.  Contrib.  Sci.  No.  142:1-21. 

1969.  A new  avian  fossil  from  Kern  County,  California.  Condor,  71:68-69. 


26 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  290 


1971.  Pliocene  avian  remains  from  Baja  California.  Los  Angeles  Co.  Mus. 

Contrib.  Sci.  No.  217:1-17. 

1976.  A new  species  of  flightless  auk  from  the  Miocene  of  California  (Al- 

cidae:Mancallinae).  Smithsonian  Contrib.,  Paleobiol.,  27:141-146. 

Howard,  H.  and  J.A.  White.  1962.  A second  record  of  Osteodontornis,  Miocene 
“toothed”  bird.  Los  Angeles  Co.  Mus.  Contrib.  Sci.  No.  52:1-12. 

Miller,  L.  1925.  Avian  remains  from  the  Miocene  of  Lompoc,  California.  Carnegie 
Inst.  Washington,  Publ.  No.  349:107-117. 

1929.  A new  cormorant  from  the  Miocene  of  California.  Condor,  31:167-172. 

1935.  New  bird  horizons  in  California.  Publ.  Univ.  California  Los  Angeles, 

Biol.  Sci.  l(5):73-80. 

1951.  A Miocene  petrel  from  California.  Condor,  53:78-80. 

1961.  Birds  from  the  Miocene  of  Sharktooth  Hill,  California.  Condor,  63:399- 

402. 

1962.  A new  albatross  from  the  Miocene  of  California.  Condor,  64:471-472. 

Milne-Edwards,  A.  1874.  Observations  sur  les  oiseaux  fossiles  des  faluns  des  Saucats  et 
de  la  mollasse  de  Leognan.  Bib.  Ecole  Haute  Etudes,  Sect.  Sci.  Nat.  XI(3):  1-12. 

Shufeldt,  R.W.  1896.  Fossil  bones  of  birds  and  mammals  from  Grotto  Pietro  Tamponi 
and  Grive-St.  Alban.  Proc.  Acad.  Nat.  Sci.  Phila.  1896,  pp.  507-516. 

Storer,  R.W.  1956.  The  fossil  loon,  Colymboides  minutus.  Condor,  58:413-426. 

1960.  Evolution  in  the  diving  birds.  Proc.  XII  Internat.  Omith.  Congress, 

Helsinki,  1958,  pp.  694-707. 

Warter,  S.L.  1976.  A new  osprey  from  the  Miocene  of  California  (Falconiformes:Pan- 
dionidae).  Smithsonian  Contrib.  Paleobiol.  27:133-139. 

Wetmore,  A.  1930.  Fossil  bird  remains  from  the  Temblor  Formation  near  Bakersfield, 
California.  Proc.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci.,  4th  Ser.,  19(8):85-93. 

1941.  An  unknown  loon  from  the  Miocene  fossil  beds  of  Maryland.  Auk, 

58:567. 

1943.  Fossil  birds  from  the  Tertiary  deposits  of  Florida.  Proc.  New  England 

Zool.  Club.,  22:59-68. 

Wilkinson,  H.E.  1969.  Description  of  an  Upper  Miocene  albatross  from  Beaumaris, 
Victoria,  Australia,  and  review  of  fossil  Diomedeidae.  Mem.  National  Mus.  Vic- 
toria, 29:41-51. 


Accepted  for  publication  June  8,  1977. 


50 7. 73 
C.ai-%62 


NUMBER  291 
MARCH  22,  1978 


THE  NET-WINGED  MIDGES  OF  EASTERN  NORTH  AMERICA, 
WITH  NOTES  ON  NEW  TAXONOMIC  CHARACTERS 
IN  THE  FAMILY  BLEPHARICERIDAE  (DIPTERA) 


By  Charles  L.  Hogue 


| 

NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCENCC 


Published  by  the  NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM 
OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007 


SERIAL  PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE 
NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 

Prior  to  November  30,  1973,  publications  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  have  appeared 
under  various  formats — Leaflet  Series,  Museum  Graphic,  Science  Series,  Study  Guides,  Con- 
tributions in  Science,  Contributions  in  History,  Science  Bulletins,  unnumbered  catalogs  of 
exhibitions,  and  other  miscellaneous  publications.  The  Museum  now  publishes  the  following 
serials  at  irregular  intervals  as  CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE,  HISTORY  BULLETINS, 
SCIENCE  BULLETINS,  EDUCATION  SERIES,  HISTORY  SERIES,  and  SCIENCE  SE- 
RIES. The  Contributions  are  short  papers  of  octavo  size.  The  Bulletins  are  longer,  compre- 
hensive papers  of  quarto  size.  The  Series  are  papers  of  variable  lengths  of  quarto  or  larger 
size.  Papers  in  each  serial  are  numbered  separately  and  consecutively. 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  contain  articles  in  the  earth  and  life  sciences,  presenting 
results  of  original  research.  Emphasis  is  intended  principally  for  papers  allied  to  biosystematic 
research,  but  other  subjects  and  review-oriented  ones  will  be  considered.  Number  1 was  issued 
on  January  23,  1957.  Contributions  must  be  not  less  than  8 nor  exceed  72  printed  pages. 

INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  AUTHORS 

Acceptance  of  manuscripts  will  be  determined  by  the  significance  of  new  information.  Priority 
will  be  given  to  manuscripts  by  staff  members.  All  manuscripts  must  be  recommended  by  the 
curator  in  charge  of  each  discipline  or  by  the  Editorial  Board.  Manuscripts  must  conform  to 
the  specifications  listed  below.  They  will  be  examined  for  suitability  by  the  Editorial  Board 
and  will  include  review  by  specialists  outside  the  Museum. 

Authors  must  adhere  to  the  International  Code  of  Nomenclature  of  Bacteria  and  Viruses, 
International  Code  of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  and  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature, including  their  respective  recommendations.  Further,  authors  proposing  new  taxa  in 
a CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  must  indicate  that  all  primary  types  have  been  deposited 
in  an  appropriate  scientific  institution  of  their  choice  and  must  cite  that  institution  by  name. 

MANUSCRIPT  FORM. — (1)  In  preparation  of  copy  follow  the  1972  CBE  Style  Manual, 
third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapters  5 and  6.  (2)  Footnotes  should  be  avoided;  acknowledgments 
as  footnotes  will  not  be  accepted.  (3)  An  informative  abstract  must  be  included  for  all  papers. 
(4)  A Spanish  summary  is  required  for  all  manuscripts  dealing  with  Latin  American  subjects. 
Summaries  in  other  languages  are  not  required  but  are  strongly  recommended.  (5)  A differ- 
ential diagnosis  must  accompany  any  newly  proposed  taxon.  (6)  Submit  two  copies  of  manu- 
script. 

ILLUSTRATIONS. — All  illustrations,  including  maps  and  photographs,  will  be  referred  to 
as  figures.  All  illustrations  should  be  of  sufficient  clarity  and  in  proper  proportions  for  reduc- 
tion to  CONTRIBUTIONS  page  size.  In  preparing  illustrations  and  legends  consult  the  1972 
CBE  Style  Manual,  third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapter  5.  Submit  only  illustrations  made  with 
permanent  ink  and  glossy  photographic  prints  of  good  contrast.  Submit  duplicate  copies  of 
all  illustrations.  Original  illustrations  will  be  returned  after  the  manuscript  has  been  published. 

PROOF. — Authors  will  be  sent  galley  proofs  which  should  be  corrected  and  returned  promptly. 
No  changes  or  alterations,  other  than  typesetting  corrections,  will  be  allowed  unless  paid  by 
author.  Requests  for  reprints  may  be  placed  through  the  Editor. 

R.  Edward  Ostermeyer 
Editor 


All  communications  concerning  manuscripts  and  exchange  of  or  purchase  of  publications 
should  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Museum  Publications,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 


Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America  by  Chapman's  Phototypesetting  on  70#  Patina  Book 


THE  NET-WINGED  MIDGES  OF  EASTERN  NORTH  AMERICA, 
WITH  NOTES  ON  NEW  TAXONOMIC  CHARACTERS 
IN  THE  FAMILY  BLEPHARICERIDAE  (DIPTERA)1 

By  Charles  L.  Hogue2 


Abstract:  The  single  genus  Blepharicera  Macquart  of  the  family  Blepharicer- 
idae  occurs  in  eastern  North  America,  probably  arriving  historically  via  a continental 
connection  with  western  Europe,  and  is  now  distributed  through  Appalachia,  New 
England,  the  northern  Great  Lakes  Region  and  southeastern  Canada.  Six  species  are 
recognized,  discussed  and  figured:  B.  capitata  (Loew),  cherokea  new  species,  dim- 
inutiva  new  species,  similans  (Johannsen),  tenuipes  (Walker),  and  williamsae  (Alex- 
ander). Six  larval  types  also  are  known  but  none  definitely  can  be  associated  with 
adults  (although  three  are  provisionally  identified).  Pupal  anatomy,  with  one  excep- 
tion, is  homogeneous,  defying  species  characterization. 

The  usefulness  of  taxonomic  characters  in  the  group  is  discussed  including  ap- 
plication of  several  new  terms. 


INTRODUCTION 

The  family  Blephariceridae  is  represented  in  eastern  North  America  by  the  single 
genus  Blepharicera,  in  which  six  species  are  recognized  presently.  These  species, 
here  designated  as  the  “Tenuipes  Group,”  are  extremely  similar  in  all  stages  and 
undoubtedly  arose  from  a single  ancestral  form.  Blepharicera  is  now  known  to  occur 
only  in  the  northern  hemisphere,  ranging  more  or  less  continuously  and  narrowly 
across  Asia  through  northern  Spain,  the  Alps  and  Balkans,  Caucasus,  Himalayas,  to 
Japan  and  North  Korea.  Species  also  are  found  disjunctly  in  northern  Borneo,  Thai- 
land, Taiwan  and  neighboring  China.  This  is  a so-called  “Tethyan  distribution”  and 
suggests,  within  the  tenets  of  plate  tectonics,  that  the  genus  originated  in  Laurasia  and 
expanded  to  the  south  only  as  far  as  the  northern  margin  of  the  Tethyan  Sea. 

Introduction  to  North  America  could  have  occurred  via  Europe-Newfoundland  or 
Bering  connections.  I favor  the  former  route  for  the  Tenuipes  Group  because  of  the 
total  lack  of  close  relatives  in  western  North  America.  (B.  ostensackeni  may  form  an 
exception  but  it  is  not  clearly  a member  of  this  group.) 

The  western  species  of  Blepharicera  could  have  evolved  secondarily  from  a western 
extension  of  this  stock,  but  they  are  an  assemblage  of  distinct  species  quite  unlike  the 
eastern  species  and  I think  it  much  more  likely  that  they  arrived  independently  from 


‘Review  Committee  for  this  Contribution 
C.  P.  Alexander 
Douglas  Craig 
Julian  P.  Donahue 

2Senior  Curator  of  Entomology,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County,  900  Expo- 
sition Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California,  90007. 


2 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


one  or  more  introductions  over  a Bering  connection  from  eastern  Asia.  This  thesis  is 
supported  further  by  the  parallel  occurrence  in  western  North  America  of  the  genera 
Bibiocephala  and  Philorus , both  of  which  have  very  close  relatives  in  Japan  and  other 
parts  of  Asia.  Unfortunately,  there  is  no  information  on  the  occurrence  of  the  genus 
in  Alaska  and  northern  and  central  Canada  which  could  establish  continuity  between 
the  eastern  and  western  forms. 

The  eastern  Blepharicera  are  now  known  from  as  far  west  as  eastern  Minnesota 
through  southern  Ontario  and  all  the  southeastern  Canadian  provinces,  through  New 
England  and  down  the  Appalachian  cordillera  to  its  southern  extreme  in  Georgia. 
Included  in  this  distribution  are  the  Canadian  provinces  of  Quebec,  Ontario,  New- 
foundland, New  Brunswick  and  Nova  Scotia,  and  the  American  states  of  Maine, 
Vermont,  New  Hampshire,  Minnesota,  New  York,  Massachusetts,  Connecticut, 
Pennsylvania,  New  Jersey,  Maryland,  Virginia,  West  Virginia,  North  Carolina,  South 
Carolina,  Tennessee  and  Georgia.  I predict  that  they  may  eventually  be  discovered 
in  extreme  northeastern  Alabama,  eastern  Kentucky  and  possibly  Michigan  and 
Manitoba. 

This  largely  congruent  distribution  and  the  extreme  morphological  similarity  of  all 
the  species  has  made  it  impossible,  without  rearings,  to  firmly  establish  associations 
of  the  immature  with  the  adult  stages.  As  many  as  three  species  can  occur  at  the  same 
locality,  so  that  stages  associated  in  single  collections  do  not  necessarily  belong  to 
the  same  species.  A further  barrier  to  relating  the  larvae  to  the  adults  is  the  total 
homogeneity  of  pupal  morphology.  Whereas  identifiable  pharate  adults  may  be  related 
to  pupae  by  dissection,  there  is  no  way  to  transcend  the  gap  between  larva  and  pupa. 
The  one  exception  to  this  is  the  distinctive  form  “F”  with  conspicuous  median  dorsal 
convexities  on  the  abdomen  of  larva  and  pupa.  Unfortunately,  the  one  mature  form 
“F”  pupa  available  did  not  yield  an  identifiable  female. 

These  difficulties  have  prevented  me  from  definitely  establishing  stage  associations 
in  any  species,  and  all  identifications  of  immatures  cited  are  provisional.  Associations 
can  be  accomplished  with  certainty  if  specimens  are  individually  reared,  but  this  re- 
quires special  care,  time,  and  equipment.  Very  probable  associations  can  be  estab- 
lished if  collecting  is  extensive  and  carefully  done  so  that  groups  of  lawae  of  all  instars 
present,  and  pupae  in  close  proximity  (on  the  same  boulder  or  area  of  a large  rock 
face)  and  in  the  process  of  transformation,  are  preserved  apart  from  other  groups. 
Unfortunately,  the  material  available  for  this  study  was  totally  inadequate  for  this 
application.  In  the  taxonomic  treatment  below,  I have  relegated  larvae  to  each  of  the 
species  very  tentatively  and  state  my  reason,  albeit  tenuous,  for  each  association.  I 
urge  students  of  stream  biology  in  the  East  to  vigorously  and  carefully  collect  this 
genus  so  that  these  vagaries  can  be  removed. 


TAXONOMIC  CHARACTERS 
Larval  Chaetotaxy  and  Cuticular  Sclerotizations 

In  my  first  attempts  to  separate  the  very  similar  larvae  of  the  various  species  in  this 
complex,  I became  aware  immediately  of  the  need  to  utilize  new  characters.  Previ- 
ously, the  chaetotaxy  has  been  almost  totally  ignored  in  taxonomic  studies  of  larval 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


3 


Blephariceridae,  and  no  foundation  existed  upon  which  to  assess  possible  useful  char- 
acter states.  From  the  practical  standpoint  of  need  for  a consistent  terminology  and 
to  reveal  some  points  for  species  discrimination,  I undertook  a preliminary  study  of 
the  homologies  (both  serial  and  comparative  between  several  genera)  of  the  trunk 
setae;  study  of  the  head  setae  has  been  deferred. 

After  examining  the  first  instar  larvae  of  A gathon  comstocki  (Kellogg)  (Fig.  1 -west- 
ern North  America)  and  Neocurupira  chiltoni  (Campbell)  (Fig.  2 - New  Zealand)  and 
later  instars  of  numerous  genera,  it  became  apparent  that,  like  those  of  most  nema- 
tocerous  families,  blepharicerid  larvae  possess  so-called  primary  sensilla  which  make 
up  the  complete  complement  of  the  first  instar  larva  and  a much  larger  number  of 
secondary  sensilla  added  in  subsequent  instars.  The  latter  appear  in  addition  to  the 
primary  sensilla  after  the  first  molt  and  continue  to  proliferate  until  maturity  when  the 
larva  may  be  covered  with  a dense  vestiture.  In  these  later  stages  this  homogeneity 
and  density  obscures  the  recognition  of  the  primary  sensilla,  but  these  often  retain 
some  distinctive  characteristic,  such  as  larger  alveolus,  occurrence  in  pairs,  darker 
pigmentation,  larger  size,  association  with  a tubercle  or  plate,  or  unique  shape. 

These  patterns  are  very  constant  and  follow  a basic  plan  described  as  follows  for 
all  except  segments  VIII  - IX  (refer  to  figures  1 - 2 and  30  for  further  explanation): 
tergal  sensilla  (t) — most  mesal  series  on  the  dorsum  on  all  segments.  Usually  ob- 
literated in  later  instars  by  proliferation. 

subtergal  (st) — next  laterad  to  the  tergal  sensilla,  on  all  segments.  Always  distin- 
guishable in  later  instars  by  position,  setiform  shape  and  large  alveolus. 

tergopleural  (tp) — two  sensilla  situated  far  laterad  on  all  segments.  Associated 
with  the  dorsolateral  tubercle  or  plate  in  those  forms  with  these  structures.  A close- 
set  pair  of  long,  setiform  sensilla  on  the  meso-  and  metathorax  (although  paired,  not 
serially  homologous  with  abdominal  “geminate  setae”). 

pre-dorsopseudopodal  (pdpod) — in  the  first  instar  a single  sensillum  on  the  ex- 
treme base  of  the  pseudopod  on  the  abdominal  segments;  an  isolated  seta  on  the 
thorax.  In  later  instars  a group  of  setae  on  the  anterobasal  angle  of  the  dorsal  pseu- 
dopod when  this  organ  is  present. 

dorso-psetidopodal  (“geminate  setae”)  (dpod) — a pair  of  conspicuous,  always 
large,  setiform  sensilla  on  the  anterolateral  angle  of  the  trunk  segments  and  lateral 
margin  of  the  cephalic  division  in  instars  II-IV;  on  the  dorsal  surface  of  the  base  of 
the  pseudopod  in  the  first  instar.  These  sensilla  are  located  at  the  apices  of  the  dorsal 
pseudopods  when  this  organ  occurs  and  at  the  apex  of  the  posterolateral  lobe  of  the 
anal  division  (which  is  a dorsal  pseudopod  anatomically). 

pleural  (p) — a single  seta,  variously  positioned  on  the  lateral  margin.  Usually  com- 
pletely obscured  by  the  secondary  setae  in  later  instars. 

sternopleural  (sp) — on  the  thorax  of  Neocurupira  chiltoni  a single,  heavy  seta 
between  the  conspicuous  ventral  substernal  and  lateral  pleural  hairs. 

substernal  (ss) — a large  conspicuous  seta  on  the  venter  of  the  thoracic  segments, 
laterad  of  the  sucker  and  minute  sternal  (s)  setae. 

pedichetal  (pd) — This  group  is  contained  within  the  ventral  sucker  and  consists  of 
three  minute  setae.  As  shown  by  Craig  (1967:  fig.  13  and  p.  202)  the  anteriormost 
sucker  belongs  to  abdominal  segment  I,  the  posteriormost  to  abdominal  segment  VI. 


4 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


Pedichetal  sensilla,  therefore,  appear  to  be  wanting  from  the  venters  of  the  thorax  and 
anal  division. 

In  addition  to  the  relatively  large  setate  sensilla,  there  are  various  minute  sense 
organs  (intertergal-it,  intersternal-is,  intercalary -ic),  some  appearing  as  minuscule 
hairlike  processes,  other  as  hairless  rings  (sensilla  campaniforme).  Their  positions  are 
very  constant  in  all  instars  and  species,  so  they  offer  little  more  taxonomically  than 
reference  points. 

Segments  VIII  and  IX  of  the  anal  division  are  recognizable  dorsally  by  lines  of 
sensilla  and  sclerites.  The  complements  of  both,  however,  are  reduced  and  the  no- 
menclature just  given  does  not  apply  strictly.  On  segment  VIII  a tergal  sensillum 
remains  distinct  but  the  others  are  grouped  into  a single  pleural  group.  On  segment 
IX,  the  terminal  segment,  only  a pair  of  pleurals  are  apparent  besides  the  conspicuous 
terminal  setae. 

Both  primary  and  secondary  sensilla  may  take  a variety  of  shapes,  often  charac- 
teristic of  genera  and  species.  On  the  abdomen  of  the  first  instar  of  the  two  forms 
which  I have  studied,  all  the  primary  sensilla  are  setiform  except  the  tergal  (t)  and 
the  more  lateral  of  the  tergopleurals,  both  of  which  are  lanceolate  or  coniform.  This 
is  also  true  of  the  thorax  except  for  the  tergals  and  intertergals  which  are  coniform 
and  the  pleurals  which  are  claviform. 

This  pattern  persists  in  later  larval  instars  of  Blepharicera,  except  that  the  majority 
of  the  dorsal  secondary  sensilla  assume  varied  coniform,  claviform  or  capitate  shapes 
and  arrangements  which  confer  to  them  diagnostic  value. 

The  function  of  these  organs  is  unknown.  I doubt  their  sensory  importance  because 
of  their  density.  Their  dorsal  position  and  the  frequent  occurrence  of  specimens  with 
heavy  growths  of  diatoms  and  algae  and  even  mineral  precipitates  entangled  and  at- 
tached to  them,  suggests  a function  similar  to  that  of  the  “tectorial”  setae  and  spines 
of  psychodid  larvae  (Vaillant  1959:41),  be  it  to  help  anchor  or  hide  the  animal.  The 
roughened  surface  produced  may  also  act  physically  to  reduce  resistance  with  the 
water,  like  sclerotized  projections  which  could  have  the  same  function  as  suggested 
by  Hora  1930:255.  The  condition  would  appear  to  be  specialized  and  apomorphous 
since  few  hairs  is  the  rule  in  nematocerous  and  mecopterous  larvae. 

My  study  of  chaetotaxy  remains  incomplete,  requiring  much  material  now  unavail- 
able of  first  instar  larvae  of  many  genera.  I am  continuing  to  work  on  an  analysis  of 
the  homologies  of  the  sensilla  and  hope  eventually  to  propose  a system  of  nomencla- 
ture useful  to  morphologists  and  taxonomists.  For  the  present,  I present  detailed  il- 
lustrations of  the  patterns  of  sensilla  in  these  few  species  with  only  general  topographic 
names  for  taxonomic  reference. 

Probably  associated  with  these  sensillar  modifications  is  the  tendency  of  many  lar- 
vae (although  not  Blepharicera)  to  form  dorsal  sclerotizations  since  the  positions  of 
the  latter  generally  coincide  with  the  locations  of  the  primary  setae.  The  dorsal  pseu- 
dopod (as  in  Agathon  and  Philorus)  for  example,  always  bears  the  large  paired  dorso- 
pseudopodal  (dpod)  setae  at  its  apex.  The  blepharicerid  taxonomist  is  advised,  how- 
ever, to  homologize  such  plates,  tubercles  and  other  sclerotized  processes  with  great 
caution  because  these  structures  take  similar  forms  in  unrelated  species  and  genera. 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


5 


Pupal  Structures 

With  the  exception  of  Species  F,  I have  been  unable  to  discover  characters  on  the 
pupa  which  permit  species  discrimination.  Part  of  the  problem  is  the  lack  of  complete 
material  of  all  species.  This  most  conservative  of  life  stages  shows  no  divergence  of 
structure,  even  in  detail,  among  these  very  closely  related  Eastern  species.  Size  varies 
continuously  from  the  smallest,  diminutiva,  to  the  largest,  williamsae,  so  cannot  be 
used  as  a discrete  objective  character. 

Adult  Structures 

Aside  from  the  number  of  bristles  on  the  parietal  sclerite  of  the  head,  which  varies 
from  none  in  most  males  to  up  to  50  in  females  of  williamsae,  there  is  little  in  the 
general  anatomy  of  either  sex  to  reliably  distinguish  the  species. 

It  should  be  emphasized  that  the  latter  statement  is  also  largely  true  of  size  and 
external  body  coloration,  although  these  characters  formed  the  basis  of  Alexander’s 
key  (1963:52-53).  After  trying  to  reconcile  the  several  hundred  adults  used  in  the 
present  study  with  this  key,  I have  come  to  the  conclusion  that  coloration  in  this 
species  group  is  a character  of  very  limited  use  because,  (1)  it  varies  continuously 
from  species  to  species  (smaller  species  tending  to  be  paler  than  larger)  and  (2)  its 
interpretation  is  too  easily  confused  by  the  condition  and  age  of  the  specimen  when 
killed,  presence  of  grease,  and  the  angle  of  lighting  and  viewing.  Regarding  this  last 
point,  I should  explain  that  the  integument  induces  interference  phenomena  in  light 
rays  reflected  from  it  and  it  displays  spectral  colors  when  viewed  from  oblique  angles. 
Thus,  the  pigmentary  colors  are  obscured  and  distorted  by  other  than  perpendicular 
viewing  and  the  thorax  seems  to  change  in  color  from  gray  to  brown  as  the  specimen 
is  rotated  under  the  stereoscopic  microscope. 

The  most  useful  species  characters  in  this  group,  as  with  most  nematocerous  Dip- 
tera,  are  to  be  found  in  the  genitalia.  In  the  male  the  following  three  character  com- 
plexes are  those  applied  mainly:  (1)  shape  of  the  apex  and  shaft  of  the  parameres; 
(2)  shape  of  the  apices  of  the  penis  filaments;  and  (3)  shape  of  the  IXth  tergite  lobes. 
All  tend  to  be  simpler  in  the  smaller  species,  a fact  which  throws  some  light  on  the 
phylogeny  of  the  group  by  suggesting  that  size  differences  may  have  generated  al- 
lometric  structures  that  present  reproductive  barriers  (see  REMARKS  under  diminutiva). 

Genitalic  features  of  the  females  are  less  well  marked  than  in  the  males.  B.  similans 
is  highly  distinctive  in  lacking  a normal  median  spermatheca  (correlated  with  the 
overly  long  and  apically  modified  median  penis  filament  in  the  male)  but  the  number 
of  these  organs  remains  three  in  all  the  other  forms.  Of  use  primarily  are  the  following 
characters  although  even  these  all  seem  to  be  subject  to  such  variation  as  to  make 
identification  of  isolated  or  atypical  specimens  often  impossible:  (1)  number  and  dis- 
tribution of  macrochaetae  on  the  VUIth  sternite  lobes,  (2)  shape  of  the  median  fold, 
especially  the  median  basal  sclerotization  thereof,  (3)  sclerotizations  of  the  spermathe- 
cal  ducts. 

An  additional  fairly  definitive  and  constant  character  is  the  shape  of  an  organ  which 


6 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


I interpret  from  gross  morphology  as  the  accessory  gland.  Unfortunately  it  is  some- 
times difficult  to  discern  in  slide  mounts,  but  when  evident  its  outline  takes  a variety 
of  consistent  forms. 


PROCEDURE 

All  statistics  given  are  means  with  the  range  in  parentheses.  Unless  otherwise  noted, 
the  sample  size  for  each  set  of  measurements  was  normally  10  for  wings  and  legs, 
2-5  for  head  structures.  Wherever  the  sample  was  less  than  10  (e.g.  diminutiva), 
ranges  are  not  given  in  the  descriptions.  Because  of  the  small  series  available  from 
specific  localities,  it  was  usually  necessary  to  take  data  from  mixed  populations.  Body 
length  of  larvae  was  measured  only  on  prepupal  individuals  (pupal  branchiae  visible). 
Measurements  in  text  and  on  the  figures  are  in  millimeters. 

Proportions  of  leg  segments  are  given  as  “progressive  proportions”  meaning  that 
each  segment  is  taken  relative  to  that  proximal  rather  than  to  one  standard  segment. 
This  makes  comparisons  easier  and  more  accurate  since  the  segments  are  progressively 
shorter  to  a small  degree  or  nearly  equal  in  length;  greatly  differing  and  disjunct 
lengths  need  not  be  compared  to  one  another. 

In  the  case  of  antennal  segment  proportions,  the  basal  flagellar  segment  is  used  as 
the  standard  since  it  is  more  conveniently  and  accurately  measured  than  either  the 
scape  or  pedicel  which  are  both  globular  and  difficult  to  orient  consistently. 

Material  is  listed  separately  for  the  stages.  That  for  the  larvae  includes  pupae  which 
accompanied  the  specimens  when  collected  but  which  were  insufficiently  mature  to 
make  an  adult  determination.  Pupae  containing  pharate  adults  are  treated  as  adult 
records  and  recorded  in  their  section  of  the  species  accounts. 

Some  new  morphological  terms  have  been  introduced.  They  appear  in  bold-face 
when  first  used  in  the  text  and  their  application  explained  in  the  following  figures: 
female  genitalia  (Fig.  27);  head  capsule  (Figs.  14-15);  larva  (Figs.  1-2,  30). 

TAXONOMY-ADULTS 
Blepharicera,  Tenuipes  Group 


DIAGNOSIS 

Coloration:  General. — Integument  well  sclerotized,  generally  gray-brown  or 
deep  red-brown  with  dull  gray  (plumbeous)  overtones.  Membranes  and  appendages 
pale  yellow  to  medium  brown.  All  major  sclerite  surfaces  opalescent;  head  sclerite 
surfaces  also  finely  pruinose.  Head. — Face,  occiput  and  basal  portion  of  clypeus  gray, 
pruinose.  Suprafrontal  carina  and  distal  portion  of  clypeus  dull  orange  to  brown. 
Callis  oculi  shiny  black.  Antenna. — Scape  brownish  yellow,  pedicel  and  flagellum 
dark  brown.  Mouthparts  generally  orange  to  yellow,  palpus  grading  to  brown  apicad. 
Thorax. — Anterior  pronotum,  mesoscutum  and  scutellum  gray  to  gray  brown;  pos- 
terior pronotum,  posterolateral  comers  of  scutum  usually,  and  prescutellar  area  of 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


7 


scutum  often,  contrasting  pale  brown  or  yellow.  No  other  well-defined  lines  or  pat- 
terns on  scutum.  Preepistemum,  epistemum  and  meron  similar  to  scutum  but  lighter 
and  sometimes  with  reddish-brown  tints;  remainder  of  pleuron  light  brown  to  yellow. 
Legs. — Brownish-yellow  basad,  grading  to  dark  brown  distad.  Wing. — Hyaline  in 
both  sexes;  veins  brown.  Haltere. — Stem  yellow  or  light  brown  basad;  knob  dark 
brown.  Abdomen. — Tergites  and  stemites  similar  to  scutum.  Pleural  membranes  yel- 
low to  brown.  Genitalia  yellow  orange  to  dark  brown. 

Size:  Generally  medium  to  small  Blephariceridae.  Wing  length,  range  3.2  - 9.5 

mm. 

Head:  Structure. — General  structure  as  usually  found  in  family.  Antennal  fossae 
approximate,  mesofrons  very  narrow. 

Female.  Clypeus  length/width  2. 0-2. 2.  Suprafrons  narrow,  suprafrontal  carina 
strongly  convex.  Parietal  sclerite  broad  (0.7  times  width  of  infrafrons),  trapezoidal 
in  shape.  Ocellar  lobes  joined  to  form  a sessile  tubercle;  lenses  inserted  on  lobes 
apically.  Eyes. — Approximate  at  level  immediately  anterior  to  ocelli,  interocular  dis- 
tance equal  to  diameter  of  one  ommatidium;  upper  division  well  differentiated  from 
lower;  callis  oculi  broad,  anterior  portion  striate.  Size  of  upper  division  about  equal 
to  lower  in  area,  13-16  rows  of  ommatidia  along  maximum  dorsal  arc  of  upper  di- 
vision; upper  ommatidia  1.4-2. 5 times  diameter  of  lower.  Proboscis. — Short,  about 
0.7  times  head  width.  Mandibles  present. 

Male.  Clypeus  length/width  ratio  slightly  greater  than  female,  2.4-3. 6.  Supra- 
frons broad,  slightly  convex  mesally.  Parietal  sclerite  broad,  but  narrower  than  in  fe- 
male (0.2-0. 4 times  width  of  infrafrons),  rectangular  in  shape.  Ocellar  lobes  distinct; 
lenses  inserted  on  lobes  apically.  Eyes. — Disjunct  at  level  immediately  anterior  to 
ocelli,  ipterocular  distance  equal  to  diameters  of  3-5  upper  ommatidia;  upper  division 
well  differentiated  from  lower;  callis  oculi  absent  except  for  narrow  anterior  portion. 
Size  of  upper  division  one-fourth  to  one-half  of  lower  in  area,  8-16  rows  of  ommatidia 
as  in  female.  Proboscis. — Short,  about  0.6  times  head  width.  Mandibles  absent.  Pal- 
pal segments  five,  proportions  constant,  segment  1 small  and  fused  at  base  to  rostrum, 
3 and  4 about  equal  and  each  slightly  longer  than  2,  5 three  to  four  times  length  of 
2,  about  equal  to  2-3  combined.  Chaetotaxy . — Similar  in  sexes,  except  parietal  bris- 
tles usually  absent  in  male.  Major  setal  groups  present  as  follows:  clypeal,  variably 
sparse  over  most  of  surface;  parietal,  few  to  numerous  bristles;  vertical,  few  short 
bristles;  postvertical,  numerous  short  bristles  over  dorsal  arc  of  occipital  foramen; 
occipital,  numerous  long  bristles;  postgenal,  numerous  long  bristles.  Ocular  bristles 
short. 

Antenna.  Structure. — Moderately  long,  about  1.5  times  head  width,  15-seg- 
mented.  Scape  subspherical,  pedicel  conopiform,  flagellomeres  elongate-cylindriform 
in  female,  stouter  and  compressed  in  male.  Chaetotaxy . — Scape  with  group  of  nu- 
merous long  slender  bristles  mesoventrally.  Pedicel  with  small  dorsal  and  ventral 
groups  of  short  bristles.  Flagellomeres  with  dense  vestiture  of  macrotrichia  (these 
more  numerous  on  male)  and  scattered  placoid  sensilla  on  apical  segments  (confined 
to  apex  of  terminal  segment  in  male). 

Thorax:  Chaetotaxy. — Setal  patterns  incompletely  studied.  Scutellar  bristles 
dense  laterally,  incomplete  or  absent  mesally.  Wing. — -Venation  typical  for  genus. 


8 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


Dorsal  macrotrichia  on  veins  R5  and  M3  complete,  M1+2  and  M4  apically  only.  Legs. 
— Segments  simple,  tarsal  segments  5 all  unmodified.  Tibial  spurs  absent  from  fore 
and  mid  legs,  1 or  2 on  hind  leg.  Claws  simple,  similar  and  not  enlarged. 

Female  Genitalia:  VUIth  sternite  lobes  broadly  rounded,  with  or  without  setae. 
Oviscapt  subquadrate,  base  slightly  wider  than  apex,  inner  piece  poorly  developed. 
Spermathecae  three  (rarely  two)  in  number,  generally  ovoid  in  shape  with  no  or  poorly 
developed  necks. 

Male  Genitalia:  Segments  VIII  and  IX  not  specially  modified;  IXth  tergite 
lobes  prominent,  subquadrate  in  form,  posterior  margin  with  a small  acute  projection. 
Basistyle  short  and  broad,  slightly  longer  than  outer  dististyle.  Latter  a simple,  elon- 
gate lobe,  slightly  depressed  on  inner  surface  apically.  Inner  dististyle  a narrow  curved 
spatulate  lobe.  Phallosome  vesica  small,  spherical;  apodeme  a simple,  vertical  flange. 
Parameres  and  penis  filaments  varied  in  form. 


KEY  TO  SPECIES 
Adult  Males 

1.  Median  penis  filament  distinctly  longer  than  laterals  and  with  asymmetrical, 
hooked  apex.  Wing  length  4.1  mm  (3.4-4.65).  Apex  of  paramere  an  incurved, 
asymmetrically  bifurcate  finger.  IXth  tergite  lobe  shape  as  in  figure  22. 

similans 

Median  penis  filament  about  same  length  as  laterals,  apex  unmodified  or  only 
slightly  enlarged.  Apex  of  paramere  and  IXth  tergite  lobe  varied  in  shape  but  not 
as  above.  Wing  length  3. 2-6. 6 mm  2 

2.  Posterior  margin  of  tegmen  deeply  incised  on  either  side  of  midline.  Apex  of  par- 
amere a dorso-mesally  directed  hook.  IXth  tergite  lobe  as  in  figures  24  or  26. 

Wing  length  5.4  mm  (4. 4-6. 2)  tenuipes 

Posterior  margin  of  tegmen  entire.  Other  characters  varied  but  not  as  above  ...  3 

3.  Inner  margin  of  IXth  tergite  lobe  greatly  expanded  mesad  (posteromesal  comer 

obliterated).  Larger  species,  wing  length  4.8  mm  or  greater  4 

Inner  margin  of  IXth  tergite  lobe  straight  from  posteromesal  comer  to  base,  not 
greatly  expanded  (posteromesal  comer  angulate).  Smaller  species,  wing  length  4.8 
or  less  5 

4.  Inner  wall  of  apex  of  paramere  an  incurved,  acute  process  extending  well  beyond 
aperture.  IXth  tergite  lobe  shape  as  in  fig.  28.  Wing  length  5.6  mm  (4. 9-6.6) 

williamsae 

Inner  wall  of  apex  of  paramere  very  slightly  produced,  truncate;  aperture  terminal. 
IXth  tergite  lobe  shape  as  in  figure  16.  Wing  length  5.1  mm  (4. 8-5. 3) 
capitata 

5.  Posterior  margin  of  IXth  tergite  lobe  with  submesal  projection,  general  shape  as 

in  figure  18.  Wing  length  4.4  mm  (4. 0-4. 8)  cherokea 

Posterior  margin  of  IXth  tergite  lobe  straight,  oblique,  general  shape  as  in  figure 
20.  Wing  length  3.8  mm  (definitive  range  undetermined)  diminutiva 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


9 


Adult  Females 

1 . Two  spermathecae,  median  reduced  to  a cylindrical  rod.  Wing  length  6.0  mm  (5.4- 

7.3)  similans 

Three  spermathecae.  Wing  length  varied  2 

2.  Ducts  of  lateral  spermathecae  sclerotized  for  a short  length  before  genital  aperture. 

Wing  length  5.95  mm  (5. 2-6. 4)  capitata 

Ducts  of  spermathecae  membranous  throughout.  Wing  length  varied  3 

3.  A large  species,  wing  length  8.1  mm  (6.75-9.5).  Thoracic  scutum  with  a con- 
trasting light  brown  quadrate  area  anterior  to  scutellum.  VUIth  stemite  lobe  of 

genitalia  devoid  of  setae  williamsae 

Smaller  species,  wing  length  7.1  mm  or  less.  Thoracic  scutum  generally  unicol- 
orous.  VUIth  stemite  lobe  of  genitalia  usually  with  at  least  one  major  seta  ...  4 

4.  VUIth  sternite  lobes  contiguous,  median  fold  V-shaped.  Very  small  species,  wing 

length  5.1  mm  (definitive  range  undetermined)  diminutiva 

VUIth  sternite  lobes  disjunct,  median  fold  U-shaped.  Larger  species,  wing  length 
usually  greater  than  6.0  mm  (5.5-7. 1)  5 

5.  Mesoscutum  reddish-brown.  Accessory  gland  a straight  tube  with  irregular  anterior 

sclerotizations.  Wing  length  6.0  mm  (5. 5-6. 5)  cherokea 

Mesoscutum  dull  gray  (plumbeous).  Accessory  gland  triangular,  very  broad  pos- 
teriorly, membranous  anteriorly;  wing  length  6.6  mm  (6.0-7. 1)  tenuipes 

Blepharicera  capitata  (Loew) 

Blepharoptera  capitata  Loew  1863:298-299.  LECTOTYPE  by  present  designation,  female, 
District  of  Columbia,  Washington,  1866,  C.  R.  Osten  Sacken,  (MCZ,  No.  16124). 

Blepharocera  capitata , Osten  Sacken  1895:161.  Kellogg  1903  (partim). 

Blepharocera  tenuipes,  Aldrich  1905:172  (original  synonymy;  attributed  to  Osten  Sacken).  Kel- 
logg 1907:12.  Alexander  1963:56. 

Blepharicera  capitata,  Stone  1965:99. 

Blepharocera  separata  Alexander  1963:54-55.  NEW  SYNONYMY. 

DESCRIPTIONS 
Adult  female  (Figs.  9,  17) 

Size:  A medium-sized  Blepharicera',  measurements  as  follows:  Wing  length  5.95 

(5. 2-6. 4),  width  1.90  (1.60-2.10).  Head  width  1.06.  Labrum  length  0.31.  Palpal  seg- 
ments 2-5,  lengths:  0.10,  0.13,  0.145,  0.33.  Leg  segment  lengths  as  below: 


fore 

mid 

hind 

femur 

3.6  (3.2-3.95) 

3.6  (3.15-4.0) 

4.85  (4.25-5.4) 

tibia 

3.1  (2.75-3.35) 

3.05  (2. 3-3. 3) 

4.45  (3.95-4.9) 

tarsus  1 

1.41  (1.25-1.64) 

1.46  (1.30-1.60) 

1.78  (1.64-1.91) 

2 

0.79  (0.68-0.88) 

0.78  (0.66-0.85) 

0.64  (0.58-0.71) 

3 

0.52  (0.44-0.55) 

0.53  (0.48-0.56) 

0.39  (0.34-0.43) 

4 

0.30  (0.28-0.34) 

0.31  (0.25-0.39) 

0.26  (0.20-0.30) 

5 

0.30  (0.25-0.34) 

0.31  (0.25-0.36) 

0.29  (0.24-0.33) 

10 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


Thoracic  Coloration:  Anterior  pronotum,  mesoscutum  and  scutellum  reddish- 
brown  with  slight  gray  overtone  especially  mesad;  preepisternum,  episternum  and 
meron  like  mesoscutum  but  lighter;  remainder  of  pleuron  pale  yellow. 

Head  (Fig.  9):  Parietal  sclerite  with  few  (1-8)  setae,  restricted  to  lower  half  of 
sclerite.  Distal  four  palpal  segment  proportions:  1.0,  1.4,  1.1,  2.3.  Antennal  segment 
proportions:  0.87,  0.87,  1.0,  0.70,  0.79,  0.77,  0.75,  0.75,  0.77,  0.78,  0.76,  0.76, 
0.73,  0.74,  1.31;  ultimate  segment  1.70  length  of  penultimate. 

Legs:  Tibial  spur  formula  0-0-2  (lesser  very  small).  Progressive  proportions  of 
leg  segment  lengths  as  below: 

foreleg:  1.00,  0.86,  0.46,  0.56,  0.66,  0.58,  1.01 
midleg:  1.00,  0.85,  0.48,  0.53,  0.67,  0.59,  1.01 
hindleg:  1.00,  0.92,  0.40,  0.36,  0.61,  0.68,  1.09 

Genitalia  (Fig.  17):  VUIth  stemite  lobes  broadly  rounded,  median  fold  U- 
shaped,  very  shallow;  lobe  with  0-4  (usually  1)  macro  setae,  in  posterolateral  region. 
Spermathecae  3 in  number,  equal  in  size  and  oval  in  shape;  necks  absent;  ducts  var- 
iably sclerotized,  usually  with  posterior-most  sections  of  two  lateral  ducts  narrowed, 
smoothly  sclerotized  and  pigmented.  Accessory  gland  broad,  anterior  portion  sharply 
expanded  spherically  or  semi-rectangularly. 

Adult  male  (Figs.  3,  16) 

General:  Character  states  as  given  for  female  except  as  follows: 

Size:  Smaller  than  female;  measurements  as  follows:  Wing  length  5. 1 (4. 8-5.3), 
width  1.68  (1.60-1.80).  Head  width  0.86  (0.82-0.89).  Labrum  length  0.22  (0.20- 
0.24).  Palpal  segments  2-5,  lengths:  0.10,  0.13,  0.14,  0.38.  Leg  segment  lengths  as 
below: 


femur 
tibia 
tarsus  1 
2 

3 

4 

5 


fore 

3.1  (2. 8-3.4) 
2.8  (2.65-3.05) 
1.48  (1.38-1.63) 
0.78  (0.69-0.88) 
0.54  (0.60-0.48) 
0.29  (0.26-0.31) 
0.27  (0.25-0.31) 


mid 

3.6  (3.1-5.85) 
2.8  (2.65-3.00) 
1.47  (1.31-1.61) 
0.73  (0.64-0.82) 
0.52  (0.45-0.58) 
0.29  (0.25-0.31) 
0.28  (0.23-0.30) 


hind 

4.35  (3. 9-4.7) 
4.0  (3.65-4.4) 
1.53  (1.31-1.75) 
0.52  (0.44-0.61) 
0.34  (0.25-0.38) 
0.24  (0.20-0.29) 
0.25  (0.21-0.26) 


Head  (Fig.  3):  Parietal  sclerite  without  setae.  Distal  four  palpal  segment  pro- 
portions: 1.0,  1.4,  1.6,  4.2.  Antennal  segment  proportions:  0.70,  0.71,  1.0,  0.97, 
1.02,  1.05,  0.95,  0.98,  0.96,  1.0,  0.94,  0.94,  0.88,  0.85,  1.06;  ultimate  segment  1.2 
length  of  penultimate. 

Legs:  Tibial  spur  formula  0-0-1.  Progressive  proportions  of  leg  segments  as 
below: 

foreleg:  1.00,  0.91,  0.52,  0.53,  0.70,  0.53,  0.94 
midleg:  1.00,  0.78,  0.52,  0.50,  0.70,  0.55,  0.96 
hindleg:  1.00,  0.92,  0.38,  0.34,  0.64,  0.72,  1.02 

Genitalia  (Fig.  16):  IXth  tergite  lobes  prominent,  parallel;  lobe  shape  irregular, 
outer  comer  a rounded  right  angle,  posterior  margin  projecting  beyond  outer  angle 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


11 


as  a broadly  rounded  lobe  which  gradually  curves  into  inner  margin  to  base  of  lobe; 
bristles  numerous  and  regular  over  entire  dorsal  surface.  Paramere  broad  basally,  grad- 
ually tapering  apically  and  curving  outwardly;  apex  truncate  (inner  margin  slightly 
produced);  aperture  terminal.  Penis  filaments  3 in  number,  simple  truncate  rods,  me- 
dian slightly  longer  and  stouter  than  laterals  and  with  small  apical  collar  or  cap,  all 
shorter  than  parameres. 

VARIATION 

Some  females  fail  to  exhibit  the  typical  pigmented,  sclerotized  sections  of  the 
posterior  extremes  of  both  of  the  lateral  spermathecal  ducts.  Neither  duct  may  be  so 
modified,  but  in  any  case  this  region  of  the  duct  is  always  narrowed  and  smooth 
walled  in  contrast  to  the  wholly  membranous  tubules  found  in  other  species. 

Males  occur  in  which  the  median  penis  filament  is  scarcely  stouter  than  the  lat- 
erals, and  the  inner  margin  of  the  IXth  tergite  lobe  is  expanded.  This  character  state 
conforms  to  that  of  the  holotype  of  Blepharicera  separata  Alexander.  Since  these 
specimens  are  identical  in  all  other  ways  with  the  presumed  male  of  capitata,  I choose 
to  interpret  these  differences  as  minor  and  therefore  synonymize  Alexander’s  form. 

REMARKS 

Some  authors  have  synonymized  capitata  with  tenuipes,  but  apparently  without 
basing  their  decision  on  a thorough  examination  of  the  types  of  capitata.  I have  as- 
sembled five  specimens  which  appear  to  be  from  the  original  series  (collected  by  Osten 
Sacken)  including  two  females  labelled  “type”  in  the  collection  of  MCZ.  No  males 
are  among  these  although  indicated  in  Loew’s  description.  Believing  Loew  to  be  in 
error  in  citing  the  sex  of  his  material,  I have  selected  one  of  the  latter  two  females 
as  a lectotype. 

Superficially  these  females  are  indistinguishable  from  typical  tenuipes.  However, 
the  genitalia  are  distinct  and  define  a separate  species  to  which  I assign  equally  distinct 
males  found  at  the  type  locality  where  no  other  species  are  known  to  occur. 

DISTRIBUTION  (Fig.  37) 

This  species  is  found  along  the  entire  Appalachian  chain  and  beyond  to  the  north 
into  New  Brunswick.  The  form  named  separata  by  Alexander  may  appear  anywhere 
in  this  range  and  apparently  is  no  more  than  an  occasional  variant. 

MATERIAL 

Adults:  DISTRICT  OF  COLUMBIA.  Washington,  1866,  C.  R.  Osten  Sacken  (1  9 LEC- 
TOTYPE: MCZ  No.  16124;  4 9 PARALECTOTYPES:  MCZ  No.  16124,  AMNH,  USNM). 
GEORGIA,  Rabun  County.  Pine  Mountain,  1400  feet,  15  May  1957,  W.  R.  M.  Mason  (21  6 , 
6 9:  CNC).  Towns  County.  Hiawassee,  16  June  1945,  P.  W.  Fattig  (1  6:  USNM).  MARY- 
LAND, Cecil  County.  Octorora  Canyon,  17  June  1939,  E.  G.  Fisher  (1  9 :ANSP).  Prince 
George’s  County.  Beltsville,  28  May  1916,  W.  L.  McAtee  (2  9:USNM).  NEW  HAMPSHIRE, 
Grafton  County.  Franconia,  Mrs.  Slosson  (1  cLUSNM).  PENNSYLVANIA,  Monroe  County. 
Delaware  Water  Gap,  15  June  1934,  C.  P.  Alexander  (1  cUUSNM).  VIRGINIA,  Fairfax 
County.  Great  Falls,  21  June  1931,  A.  L.  Melander  (1  9 :USNM);  Trammel’s  Landing,  Potomac 
River,  [above  Great  Falls,  now  Riverbend  County  Park]  26,  28  May  1935,  A.  Stone  (1  6 , 2 
9 iUSNM).  VERMONT,  Chittenden  County.  Smuggler’s  Notch,  18  June  1927,  C.  P.  Alexander 
(9  :USNM). 


12 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


Atypical  {separata  form). — MAINE,  Somerset  County.  Bingham,  along  the  Kennebec 
River,  17  July  1937,  C.  P.  Alexander  (3 6 PARATYPES:  CPA).  NEW  BRUNSWICK,  North- 
umberland County.  Boiestown,  13  July  1931,  J.  M.  Aldrich  (lcCUSNM).  NORTH  CARO- 
LINA, Madison  County.  Hot  Springs  (IcCAMNH).  Swain  County.  Soco  Valley,  Cherokee,  20 
June  1954,  J.  W.  Green  (1$:CAS).  NEW  YORK,  Fulton  County.  Sport  Island,  Sacandaga 
River,  18  June  1914,  C.  P.  Alexander  (29  :USNM).  PENNSYLVANIA,  Lebanon  County.  Ono, 
7 June  1940,  A.  L.  Melander  (1  $ :USNM).  VERMONT,  Windham  County.  Dummerston,  14 
July  1908  (19  :USNM). 


Blepharicera  cherokea  new  species 


DIAGNOSIS 


Adults 

Blepharicera  cherokea  is  well  defined  only  by  characters  found  in  the  male  gen- 
italia, principally  the  shapes  of  the  IXth  tergite  lobes  and  apex  of  the  paramere.  The 
former  resembles  that  of  tenuipes , but  the  small  median  lobe  on  the  hind  margin  is 
decidedly  more  mesal  and  the  outer  corner  less  pronounced.  The  latter  presents  a 
complex  appearance  in  tenuipes,  being  a dorso-mesally  directed,  asymmetrical  hook, 
formed  by  elaboration  of  the  inner  wall,  while  in  cherokea  both  inner  and  outer  walls 
terminate  almost  equally,  giving  the  structure  an  oblique,  truncate  apex. 

Female  specimens  with  the  anterior  portion  of  the  accessory  gland  irregularly 
sclerotized  are  tentatively  assigned  to  this  species.  There  is  little  else  to  separate  them 
from  tenuipes,  the  most  closely  related  entity. 

ETYMOLOGY 

This  species  is  named  in  honor  of  the  Cherokee  Indian  Nation,  in  whose  home- 
land it  resides. 

DESCRIPTIONS 

Adult  female  (Figs.  10,  19) 

Size:  A moderately- small  Blepharicera',  measurements  as  follows:  wing  length 
6.0  (5. 5-6. 5),  width  1.96  (1.85-2.15).  Head  width  1.10.  Labrum  length  0.32.  Palpal 
segments  2-5,  lengths:  0.10,  0.14,  0.15,  0.49.  Leg  segment  lengths  as  below: 


fore 

mid 

hind 

femur 

3.7  (3.35-4.1) 

3.6  (3.15-4.0) 

4.8  (4.35-5.1) 

tibia 

3.1  (2. 7-3. 4) 

2.9  (2.55-3.05) 

4.4  (3. 9-4.6) 

tarsus  1 

1.44  (1.31-1.53) 

1.48  (1.24-1.61) 

1.90  (1.63-2.06) 

2 

0.75  (0.63-0.85) 

0.72  (0.60-0.81) 

0.66  (0.63-0.75) 

3 

0.46  (0.38-0.55) 

0.45  (0.38-0.54) 

0.38  (0.29-0.43) 

4 

0.28  (0.23-0.34) 

0.27  (0.23-0.29) 

0.26  (0.23-0.28) 

5 

0.29  (0.25-0.35) 

0.29  (0.25-0.33) 

0.29  (0.26-0.31) 

Thoracic  Coloration:  Anterior  pronotum,  mesoscutum  and  scutellum  reddish- 
brown  with  gray  overtone,  especially  mesally;  lateral  corners  of  anterior  and  posterior 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


13 


pronota  yellow;  preepistemum,  epistemum  and  meron  like  mesoscutum  but  lighter; 
remainder  of  pleuron  pale  yellow. 

Head  (Fig.  10):  Parietal  sclerite  with  numerous  (20-30)  setae  over  entire  median 
portion.  Distal  four  palpal  segment  proportions:  1.0,  1.4,  1.5,  4.9.  Antennal  segment 
proportions:  0.85,  0.85,  1.0? 0.69,  0.77,  0.85,  0.77,  0.77,  0.75,  0.77,  0.69,  0.69, 
0.62,  0.69,  1.08;  ultimate  segment  1.56  length  of  penultimate. 

Legs:  Tibial  spur  formula  0-0-2,  (lesser  spur  of  hind  leg  about  one-half  the  size 
of  greater).  Progressive  proportions  of  leg  segments  as  below: 
foreleg:  1.00,  0.82,  0.47,  0.52,  0.61,  0.61,  1.04 
midleg:  1.00,  0.82,  0.51,  0.49,  0.63,  0.60,  1.07 
hindleg:  1.00,  0.92,  0.43,  0.35,  0.58,  0.68,  1.12 

Genitalia  (Fig.  19):  VUIth  sternite  lobes  wide-set,  median  fold  shallowly  U- 
shaped;  each  lobe  with  few  to  numerous  setae.  Spermathecae  3 in  number,  equal  in 
size  and  ovoid  in  shape;  necks  short.  Accessory  gland  a straight  tube  with  irregular 
anterior  sclerotizations. 

Adult  male  (Figs.  4,  18) 

General:  Character  states  as  given  for  female  except  as  follows: 

Size:  Smaller  than  female;  measurements  as  follows:  Wing  length  4.4  (4. 0-4. 8), 
width  1.48  (1.35-1.70).  Head  width  0.67.  Labrum  length  0.19.  Palpal  segments  2-5, 
lengths  0.10,  0.14,  0.14,  0.39.  Leg  segment  lengths  as  below: 


fore 

femur  2.8  (2.55-3.1) 

tibia  2.6  (2.35-2.9) 

tarsus  1 1.46  (1.33-1.63) 

2 0.73  (0.64-0.81) 

3 0.51  (0.44-0.58) 

4 0.25  (0.23-0.28) 

5 0.23  (0.20-0.25) 


mid 

2.9  (2.6-3.55) 

2.5  (2.25-2.8) 
1.39  (1.26-1.50) 
0.69  (0.60-0.78) 
0.49  (0.41-0.54) 
0.25  (0.21-0.26) 
0.23  (0.20-0.25) 


hind 

3.75  (3. 4-4.3) 

3.5  (3. 2-3. 9) 
1.35  (1.23-1.48) 
0.45  (0.40-0.50) 
0.28  (0.25-0.31) 
0.18  (0.16-0.23) 
0.20  (0.18-0.25) 


Head  (Fig.  4):  Parietal  sclerite  without  setae.  Distal  four  palpal  segment  pro- 
portions: 1.0,  1.4,  1.4,  4.0.  Antennal  segment  proportions:  0.63,  0.63,  1.0,  0.94, 
1.16,  1.18,  1.10,  1.10,  1.10,  1.18,  1.18,  1.18,  1.10,  1.18,  1.26;  ultimate  segment 

1 .06  length  of  penultimate. 

Legs:  Tibial  spur  formula  0-0-1.  Progressive  proportions  of  leg  segments  as 
below: 

foreleg:  1.00,  0.92,  0.50,  0.50,  0.70,  0.49,  0.92 
midleg:  1.00,  0.86,  0.55,  0.50,  0.70,  0.50,  0.94 
hindleg:  1.00,  0.93,  0.39,  0.33,  0.62,  0.65,  1.13 

Genitalia  (Fig.  18):  IXth  tergite  lobes  prominent,  parallel;  lobe  shape  subquad- 
rate, outer  posterior  corner  a rounded  right  angle,  not  prominent;  pointed  lobe  pro- 
jecting from  hind  margin  displaced  mesad;  bristles  numerous  and  regular  over  entire 
dorsal  surface.  Tegmen  entire,  with  a slight  apico-median  carina.  Paramere  broad 
basally,  tapering  regularly  and  gradually  to  apex;  apex  simple,  obliquely  truncate 
(inner  wall  only  very  slightly  longer  than  outer);  aperture  terminal.  Penis  filaments 


14 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


3 in  number,  equal  in  length,  shorter  than  parameres,  all  simple  truncate  rods,  the 
median  slightly  stouter  than  laterals. 

VARIATION 

The  numer  of  setae  on  the  VUIth  stemite  lobe  of  the  female  varies  from  3 to  8. 
This  indicates  possible  heterogeneity  in  the  small  sample  available  to  me.  Associated 
material  is  definitely  needed  to  confirm  the  identity  of  the  females  of  this  species. 

REMARKS 

Association  of  the  sexes  is  in  some  doubt  because  no  females  are  available  from 
the  type  locality.  Collecting  from  populations  containing  known  males  should  easily 
resolve  the  question. 

DISTRIBUTION  (Fig.  39) 

This  species  is  known  only  from  the  type  locality  and  collections  near  the  south- 
ern end  of  the  Appalachians  (Georgia  and  North  Carolina). 

MATERIAL 

Types. — HOLOTYPE  6 (genitalia  on  slide  no.  CLH  75-166;  head  on  slide  no.  CLH  75- 
239:  NORTH  CAROLINA,  Macon  County.  Highlands,  Clear  Creek,  3200  feet,  1-2  July  1958, 
J.  G.  Franclemont.  25  PARATYPE  6 : same  data  as  holotype.  All  deposited  at  CU. 

Additional  specimens.  GEORGIA,  Dawson  County.  Amicalola  Falls  No.  5,  14  June  1960, 
G.  W.  Byers  (19$  :KU).  NORTH  CAROLINA,  Swain  County.  Bryson  City,  3-5000  feet,  May 
1936,  R.  C.  Shannon  (lcUUSNM);  Cherokee,  Soco  Valley,  20  June  1954,  J.  W.  Green 
(1  $ CAS);  Cherokee,  2000  feet,  24  May  1957,  W.  R.  M.  Mason  (1$:CNC).  TENNESSEE, 
Sevier  County.  Greenbrier  Cove,  2000  feet,  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park,  18  May 
1957,  J.  R.  Vockeroth  (2  <3:CNC). 

Blepharicera  diminutiva  NEW  SPECIES 


DIAGNOSIS 

Adults 

Although  this  is  the  smallest  species  of  Blepharicera  it  is  set  apart  from  the  other 
members  of  its  group  primarily  by  unique  features  of  the  male  genitalia;  a simple, 
subquadrate  IXth  tergite  lobe  rather  than  the  complex  and  marginally  expanded  shapes 
of  all  the  other  species,  and  the  paramere  apex  with  merely  a thin,  truncate  extension 
of  the  shaft  in  place  of  being  forked  or  spined  in  various  ways.  The  females  are 
difficult  to  distinguish  because  the  most  reliable  character  (shape  of  the  accessory 
gland)  is  often  obscure.  This  structure  is  an  indefinite,  membranous  tube  in  this  species 
whereas  in  the  other  species  it  assumes  a variety  of  forms  as  a result  of  sclerotization. 
Also  characteristic,  but  ill-defined,  are  the  close-set  VUIth  tergite  lobes,  meeting  with 
a V-shaped  median  fold  between;  in  all  the  other  species  the  median  fold  is  much 
broader,  U-shaped  and  often  with  angular  basal  corners. 

ETYMOLOGY 

The  name  is  derived  from  the  Latin  adjective  diminutivus , meaning  tiny,  in  ref- 
erence to  the  species’  small  size. 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


15 


DESCRIPTIONS 

Adult  female  (Figs.  11,  21) 

Size:  A very  small  Blepharicera\  measurements  as  follows:  Wing  length  5.1, 
width  1.63.  Head  width  0.97.  Labrum  length  0.32.  Palpal  segments  2-5,  lengths: 
0.09,  0.12,  0.13,  0.44.  Leg  segment  lengths  as  below: 


fore 

mid 

hind 

femur 

3.3 

3.1 

4.2 

tibia 

2.7 

2.55 

3.9 

tarsus  1 

1.25 

1.2 

1.6 

2 

0.595 

0.545 

0.52 

3 

0.39 

0.34 

0.33 

4 

0.215 

0.215 

0.21 

5 

0.23 

0.23 

0.22 

Thoracic  Coloration:  Anterior  pronotum  and  mesoscutum  generally  brown- 
ish-gray; scutellum  brownish-yellow;  corner  of  posterior  pronotum  yellow;  preepi- 
stemum,  epistemum  and  meron  like  mesoscutum  but  lighter;  remainder  of  pleuron 
brownish-yellow. 

Head  (Fig.  1 1):  Parietal  sclerite  with  numerous  setae  over  entire  median  portion. 
Distal  four  palpal  segment  proportions:  1.0,  1.3,  1.4,  4.9.  Antennal  segment  pro- 
portions: 0.85,  0.77,  1.0,  0.85,  0.92,  0.77,  0.77,  0.77,  0.77,  0.69,  0.69,  0.69,  0.54, 
0.54,  1.0;  ultimate  segment  1.85  length  of  penultimate. 

Legs:  Tibial  spur  formula  0-0-2  (lesser  spur  of  hind  leg  minute).  Progressive 
proportions  of  leg  segment  lengths  as  below: 

foreleg:  1.00,  0.82,  0.47,  0.48,  0.66,  0.55,  1.07 
midleg:  1.00,  0.82,  0.46,  0.46,  0.62,  0.63,  1.07 
hindleg:  1.00,  0.92,  0.42,  0.32,  0.64,  0.64,  1.05 

Genitalia  (Fig.  21):  VUIth  sternite  lobes  close-set,  median  fold  V-shaped;  each 
lobe  with  a few  (4-6)  macro  setae.  Spermathecae  3 in  number,  equal  in  size  and  ovoid 
in  shape;  necks  short  to  nearly  absent;  ducts  membranous  throughout.  Accessory  gland 
a simple  membranous  tube,  without  definite  shape. 

Adult  male  (Figs.  5,  20) 

General:  Character  states  as  given  for  female  except  as  follows: 

Size:  Smaller  than  female;  measurements  as  follows:  Wing  length  3.8,  width 
1 .29.  Head  width  0.65.  Labrum  length  0. 17.  Palpal  segments  2-5,  lengths:  0.09,  0.09, 
0.10,  0.35.  Leg  segment  lengths  as  below: 


fore 

mid 

hind 

femur 

2.3 

2.4 

3.2 

tibia 

2.1 

2.05 

2.95 

tarsus  1 

1.13 

1.07 

1.17 

2 

0.51 

0.50 

0.35 

3 

0.35 

0.35 

0.22 

4 

0.19 

0.19 

0.145 

5 

0.17 

0.18 

0.17 

16 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


Head  (Fig.  5):  Parietal  sclerite  without  setae.  Distal  four  palpal  segment  pro- 
portions: 1.0,  1.0,  1.1,  3.9.  Antennal  segment  proportions:  0.90,  0.70,  1.0,  0.80, 
0.90,  1.0,  0.90,  0.90,  0.80,  0.90,  0.80,  0.90,  0.80,  0.90,  1.10;  ultimate  segment  1.2 
length  of  penultimate. 

Legs:  Tibial  spur  formula  0-0-1.  Progressive  proportions  of  leg  segment  lengths 
as  below: 

foreleg:  1.00,  0.91,  0.54,  0.45,  0.69,  0.54,  0.89 

midleg:  1.00,  0.85,  0.52,  0.46,  0.70,  0.54,  0.94 

hindleg:  1.00,  0.91,  0.40,  0.30,  0.63,  0.66,  1.15 

Genitalia  (Fig.  20):  IXth  tergite  lobes  prominent,  slightly  divergent;  lobe  shape 
subquadrate,  a slight  lobe  projecting  from  midposterior  margin,  inner  margin  straight; 
bristles  numerous  and  regular  over  entire  dorsal  surface.  Tegmen  entire.  Paramere 
with  a broad  base,  straight  and  gradually  tapering  shaft;  apex  a short,  truncate,  thin 
extension,  with  a slightly  produced  inner  margin;  aperture  terminal.  Penis  filaments 
3 in  number,  equal  in  length,  shorter  than  parameres;  all  simple,  similar,  capitate 
rods. 

REMARKS 

The  simplicity  of  several  characters  in  both  sexes  (shape  of  the  male  IXth  tergite 
lobe,  V-shaped  female  median  fold)  of  this  species,  its  overall  smallness  and  its  rarity 
raise  the  possibility  that  it  may  actually  constitute  the  negative  allomorphic  variant 
of  another,  sympatric  form,  perhaps  cherokea.  However,  until  this  can  be  positively 
demonstrated,  I think  the  entity  should  be  recognized  as  a species. 

DISTRIBUTION  (Fig.  38) 

This  species  has  the  most  restricted  range  of  the  eastern  B lepharicera.  It  is  known 
only  from  localities  clustered  in  the  southernmost  sector  of  the  Blue  Ridge  Mountains 
located  at  the  junction  of  the  states  of  Georgia,  South  Carolina  and  North  Carolina. 

MATERIAL 

Types. — HOLOTYPE  8 (genitalia  on  slide  no.  CLH  75-177;  wing  on  slide  no.  CLH  75- 
243):  NORTH  CAROLINA,  Macon  County.  Highlands,  Clear  Creek,  3200  feet,  1 July  1958, 
J.  G.  Franc lemont;  ALLOTYPE  9 (genitalia  on  slide  no.  CLH  75-155;  mid  and  hind  legs  on 
slide  no.  CLH  75-248);  1 PARATYPE  8 and  1 PARATYPE  9 : same  data  as  holotype.  All 
deposited  at  CU. 

Additional  specimens. — NORTH  CAROLINA,  Transylvania  County.  Lake  Toxaway,  12 
July  1957,  J.  G.  Chillcott  (1  cLCNC).  GEORGIA,  Rabun  County.  Addie  Branch,  east  fork  of 
Chattooga  River,  2400  feet,  1 August  1957,  J.  G.  Chillcott  (1  9 :CNC);  Rabun  Bald,  3000  feet, 
14  July  1957,  J.  G.  Chillcott  (19  :CNC);  Tallulah  Falls,  10  June  1910  (1  9 :CU);  Satalah,  2000 
feet,  1 July  1957,  J.  R.  Vockeroth  (2<?:CNC). 

Blepharicera  similans  (Johannsen) 


Blepharocera  similans  Johannsen  1929:  123-124.  Type  locality,  Massachusetts,  Hampshire 
County,  Orient  Springs,  near  Amherst.  Holotype  male,  CU. 

Blepharocera  similans , Johannsen  1934:50.  Alexander  1963:55. 

Blepharicera  similans,  Stone  1965:99. 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


17 


DESCRIPTIONS 

Adult  female  (Figs.  12,  23) 

Size:  A medium-sized  Blepharicera\  measurements  as  follows:  Wing  length  6.0 
(5. 4-7. 3),  width  2.05  (1.69-2.75).  Head  width  1.08.  Labrum  length  0.37.  Palpal  seg- 
ments 2-5,  lengths:  0.11,  0.14,  0.14,  0.45.  Leg  segment  lengths  as  below: 


fore 

mid 

hind 

femur 

3.5  (2.3-4.25) 

3.76  (3.25-6.65) 

4.8  (4.25-5.65) 

tibia 

3.0  (2.75-3.55) 

2.9  (2.6-3.25) 

4.3  (3.7-5.05) 

tarsus  1 

1.44  (1.26-1.68) 

1.30  (1.15-1.44) 

1.70  (1.41-2.0) 

2 

0.71  (0.57-0.81) 

0.67  (0.54-0.76) 

0.60  (0.46-0.73) 

3 

0.41  (0.26-0.50) 

0.41  (0.30-0.46) 

0.36  (0.28-0.41) 

4 

0.30  (0.29-0.33) 

0.26  (0.21-0.30) 

0.26  (0.21-0.30) 

5 

0.34  (0.28-0.43) 

0.33  (0.30-0.40) 

0.34  (0.31-0.39) 

Thoracic  Coloration:  Anterior  pronotum  and  mesoscutum  generally  dark 
gray-brown;  scutellum  distinctly  lighter  than  mesoscutum,  brown,  darker  laterally; 
preepistemum,  epistemum  and  meron  reddish  brown;  remainder  of  pleuron  light- 
brown. 

Head  (Fig.  12):  Parietal  sclerite  with  numerous  setae  (15-20)  on  lateral  half  of 
surface.  Distal  four  palpal  segment  proportions:  1.0,  1.25,  1.2,  4.0.  Antennal  segment 
proportions:  0.60,  0.80,  1.0,  0.78,  0.71,  0.75,  0.66,  0.63,  0.63,  0.60,  0.59,  0.59, 
0.59,  0.54,  0.93;  ultimate  segment  1.72  length  of  penultimate. 

Legs:  Tibial  spur  formula  0-0-1.  Progressive  proportions  of  leg  segment  lengths 
as  below: 

foreleg:  1.00,  0.86,  0.47,  0.49,  0.58,  0.75,  1.12 
midleg:  1.00,  0.77,  0.44,  0.51,  0.61,  0.63,  1.28 
hindleg:  1.00,  0.89,  0.40,  0.35,  0.60,  0.72,  1.32 

Genitalia  (Fig.  23):  VUIth  stemite  lobes  broadly  rounded,  median  fold  deep, 
U-shaped,  basal  comers  angular;  lobe  without  setae.  Spermathecae  2 in  number,  the 
median  one  reduced  to  a vestigial,  sclerotized  bar;  laterals  ovoid,  equal  in  size  and 
in  shape;  necks  very  short;  ducts  membranous  throughout.  Accessory  gland  cylindrical 
with  a slightly  inflated  median  zone. 

Adult  male  (Figs.  6,  22) 

General:  Character  states  as  given  for  female  except  as  follows: 

Size:  Smaller  than  female;  measurements  as  follows:  Wing  length  4. 1 (3.4-4.65), 
width  1.32  (1.20-1.50).  Head  width  0.73  (0.69-0.82).  Labrum  length  0.21  (0.18- 
0.24).  Palpal  segments  2-5,  lengths  0.08,  0.12,  0.12,  0.42.  Leg  segment  lengths  as 
below: 


fore 

mid 

hind 

femur 

2.6  (2.2-3.05) 

2.7  (2.2-3. 2) 

3.55  (2.9-4.25) 

tibia 

2.4  (1. 9-2.9) 

2.3  (2. 0-2. 7) 

3.3  (2.7-3.85) 

tarsus  1 

1.31  (0.85-1.56) 

1.26  (0.98-1.48) 

1.23  (0.98-1.45) 

2 

0.62  (0.44-0.75) 

0.60  (0.49-0.74) 

0.39  (0.33-0.48) 

18 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


3 

4 

5 


fore 

0.42  (0.28-0.61) 
0.22  (0.13-0.28) 
0.22  (0.16-0.28) 


mid 

0.41  (0.33-0.48) 
0.22  (0.16-0.28) 
0.22  (0.16-0.28) 


hind 

0.23  (0.16-0.30) 
0.16  (0.13-0.19) 
0.20  (0.13-0.24) 


Head  (Fig.  6):  Parietal  sclerite  without  setae.  Distal  four  palpal  segment  pro- 
portions: 1.0,  1.3,  1.4,  4.1.  Antennal  segment  proportions:  0.77,  0.68,  1.0,  0.79, 
0.82,  0.86,  0.79,  0.76,  0.72,  0.74,  0.75,  0.81,  0.80,  0.83,  1.11;  ultimate  segment 
1.3  length  of  penultimate. 

Legs:  Tibial  spur  formula  0-0-1.  Progressive  proportions  of  leg  segments  as 
below: 

foreleg:  1.00,  0.93,  0.55,  0.47,  0.68,  0.51,  1.02 
midleg:  1.00,  0.86,  0.54,  0.47,  0.68,  0.54,  1.00 
hindleg:  1.00,  0.94,  0.37,  0.32,  0.59,  0.70,  1.25 

Genitalia  (Fig.  22):  IXth  tergite  lobes  prominent,  parallel;  lobe  shape  irregular, 
outer  comer  a rounded  right  angle,  posterior  margin  projecting  posteriorly  as  an  acute 
prominence,  inner  margin  evenly  and  shallowly  curved  to  the  slightly  constricted  base; 
bristles  numerous  and  regular  over  entire  dorsal  surface.  Tegmen  entire.  Paramere 
broad  basally,  tapering  gradually  to  two-thirds,  then  abruptly  narrowing  ectally  to 
point  where  ental  wall  terminates,  apex  extended  beyond  aperture  as  a gradually  in- 
curved, asymmetrically  bifurcate  finger.  Penis  filaments  3 in  number,  all  shorter  than 
paramere  but  median  heavier  and  longer  than  laterals  and  with  a hooked  apex. 

VARIATION 

No  notable  variations  were  observed  in  this  species,  which  is  the  most  constant 
and  distinctive  member  of  the  Tenuipes  Group. 

REMARKS 

The  female  of  this  species  is  unique  in  the  genus  in  the  absence  of  the  median 
spermatheca.  The  organ  is  replaced  by  an  elongate  structure  apparently  modified  es- 
pecially to  receive  the  male’s  extra  long,  hooked,  median  penis  filament.  The  func- 
tional significance  of  this  adaptation  is  unknown. 

DISTRIBUTION  (Fig.  40) 

There  are  collections  of  similans  from  localities  along  the  entire  Appalachian 
chain  from  Maine  to  South  Carolina  and  Tennessee.  The  species  is  sympatric  with 
all  the  other  members  of  its  group,  but  would  appear  to  be  the  least  likely  one  to 
hybridize  because  of  the  genitalic  peculiarities  mentioned  above.  This  also,  perhaps, 
explains  its  lack  of  variability. 

MATERIAL 

Adults. — CANADA.  NOVA  SCOTIA,  Colchester  County.  Truro,  4 July  1913,  R.  Matheson 
(3  6 :CU).  QUEBEC,  Gatineau  County.  Wakefield,  9 July  1946,  G.  E.  Shewell  (2  <3:CNC); 
18  September  1928,  25  July  1926,  F.'p.  Ide  (1  6,  1 9:ROM);  21  July  1926,  G.  S.  Walley 
(1  6,  1 9:CNC);  1 July  1959,  J.  R.  Vockeroth  (1  6,  1 9:CNC).  Huntingdon  County.  Covey 
Hill,  8 July  1924,  G.  S.  Walley  (1  cLCNC).  Laprarie  County.  Laprarie,  8 July  1924,  G.  S. 
Walley  (1  cLCNC).  UNITED  STATES.  GEORGIA,  Dawson  County.  Amicalola  Falls  No.  5, 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


19 


14  June  1960,  G.  W.  Byers  (1  9:KU).  Rabun  County.  Satalah,  2000  feet,  1 July  1957,  J.  R. 
Vockeroth  (5  8 :CNC).  Warwoman  Creek,  1500  feet,  31  July  1957,  J.  G.  Chillcott  (2  8, 
1 9 :CNC).  MASSACHUSETTS,  Hampshire  County.  Amherst,  25  June  1927  (1  8 :BMNH), 
Orient  Springs,  375  feet,  30  May  1926,  C.  P.  Alexander  (1  9 :CPA).  NEW  HAMPSHIRE,  Coos 
County.  Gorham,  18  July  1929,  G.  S.  Walley  (5  8 :CNC).  Moose  Creek,  Gorham,  19  July  1929, 
J.  McDunnough  (1  9 :CNC).  Dolly  Copp,  White  Mountains,  29  August  1937,  A.  L.  Melander 
(1  8 , 5 9 :USNM).  County  Unknown.  White  Mountains,  Morrison  (28  :USNM).  NEW  YORK, 
Essex  County.  Wilmington,  Adirondacks,  31  July  1929,  A.  L.  Melander  (4  8,  6 9 :USNM). 
High  Falls,  Ausable  River,  5 July  1938.  C.  P.  Alexander  (2  cLUSNM).  Lake  Placid,  28  July 
1929,  A.  L.  Melander  (5  c?:USNM);  1 July  1922,  J.  M.  Aldrich  (3  c?:USNM);  19  July  1962, 
J.  R.  Vockeroth  (3  9 :CNC).  NORTH  CAROLINA,  A very  County.  Linville,  3200  feet,  21  June 
1939,  C.  P.  Alexander  (3  9 :CPA).  Macon  County.  Clear  Creek,  Highlands,  3200  feet,  1-2  July 
1958,  J.  G.  Franclemont  (18  <J:CU).  Wayah  Bald,  3500  feet,  6 July  1957,  J.  R.  Vockeroth 
(1  9 :CNC).  Wayah  Gap,  3500  feet,  10  August  1957,  J.  G.  Chillcott  (2  9 :CNC).  Swain  County. 
Smokemount,  2 July  1941,  A.  L.  Melander  (1  cLUSNM).  Bryson  City,  3-5000  feet,  May  1936, 
R.  C.  Shannon  (1  8 :USNM).  Wilkes  County.  Stone  Mountain  State  Park,  10  July  1973,  G.  K. 
Pratt  (2  8,2  9:HDP).  TENNESSEE,  Sevier  County.  Chimneys,  Great  Smoky  Mountains  Na- 
tional Park,  8 July  1941,  A.  L.  Melander  (1  8 :USNM).  Smoky  Mountains,  23  October  1938, 
I,  Williams  (1  9:CPA).  VIRGINIA,  Page  County.  Luray,  24  June  1933,  A.  L.  Melander 
(2  8 :USNM). 

Pupae  (pharate  adults  dissected). — UNITED  STATES.  NEW  YORK,  Jefferson  County. 
Watertown,  30  November  1881,  J.  Q.  Adams,  No.  2213  (8  9,3  pupae,  20  larvae:USNM). 
Ulster  County.  Vemooy  Kill,  3/4  mi  NW  Wawarsing,  28  July  1974,  P.  & B.  Wygodzinsky  (26 
pupae,  8 larvae:AMNH).  NORTH  CAROLINA,  Swain  County.  Noland  Creek,  Great  Smoky 
Mountains  National  Park,  16  August  1973,  24  May  1974,  R.  L.  Green  (1  pupa  :LACM).  TEN- 
NESSEE, Sevier  County.  Greenbrier  Cove,  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park,  22  May,  10  Sep- 
tember (?)  1938,  A.  C.  Cole  (34  pupae:UT).  VIRGINIA,  Giles  County.  Stoney  Creek,  1800, 
2000  feet,  26  May  1962,  J.  R.  Vockeroth  (18  pupae,  48  larvae:CNC).  County  Unknown.  Dark 
Hollow  Falls,  Shenandoah  National  Park,  30  July  1949,  E.  A.  Chapin  (15  pupae:USNM). 


Asindulum  tenuipes  Walker  1848:86.  Type  locality,  CANADA,  Ontario,  Albany  River,  holotype 
female,  BMNH. 

Blepharocera  capitata,  Kellogg  1900:1903  (partim).  Johannsen  1903:333-336. 

Blepharocera  tenuipes,  Comstock  & Comstock  1895:432-436.  Aldrich  1905:172.  Kellogg 
1907:12.  Johannsen  1934:54.  Alexander  1963:56. 

Blepharicera  tenuipes.  Stone  1965:99. 

DESCRIPTIONS 
Adult  female  (Figs.  14-15,  27) 

Size:  A medium-sized  Blepharicera',  measurements  as  follows:  Wing  length  6.6 
(6.0-7. 1),  width  2.1  (1.78-2.4).  Head  width  1.08  (1.01-1.44).  Labrum  length  0.38. 
Palpal  segments  2-5,  lengths:  0.11,  0.15,  0.17,  0.46.  Leg  segment  lengths  as  below: 


Blepharicera  tenuipes  (Walker) 


fore 


mid 


hind 


femur 
tibia 
tarsus  1 


3.9  (3. 4-4.3) 
3.3  (3. 0-3. 6) 
1.57  (1.30-1.79) 
0.82  (0.68-0.94) 
0.52  (0.45-0.60) 
0.32  (0.24-0.37) 
0.39  (0.33-0.46) 


3.8  (3.35-4.2) 
3.2  (2.9-3.45) 
1.31  (0.89-1.65) 
0.77  (0.56-0.94) 
0.49  (0.41-0.59) 
0.33  (0.27-0.40) 
0.40  (0.33-0.46) 


5.4  (4.9-5. 8) 

4.9  (4.3-5. 3) 

2.10  (1.84-2.21) 
0.75  (0.68-0.84) 
0.44  (0.40-0.49) 
0.33  (0.28-0.37) 
0.36  (0.28-0.43) 


2 

3 

4 

5 


20 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


Thoracic  Coloration:  Anterior  pronotum  and  mesoscutum  generally  dull  gray 
(plumbeous),  comer  of  posterior  pronotum  and  scutellum  contrasting  light  brown, 
latter  darker  laterad;  preepistemum,  epistemum  and  meron  similar  to  scutum  but  paler 
and  with  reddish-brown  cast;  remainder  of  pleuron  brownish-yellow. 

Head  (Figs.  14-15):  Parietal  sclerite  with  numerous  setae  (22-32)  over  entire 
median  surface.  Distal  four  palpal  segment  proportions:  1.0,  1.4,  1.1,  2.7.  Antennal 
segment  proportions:  0.92,  1.00,  1.0,  0.85,  0.85,  0.85,  0.77,  0.77,  0.81,  0.85,  0.77, 
0.77,  0.69,  0.62,  0.92;  ultimate  segment  1.50  length  of  penultimate. 

Legs:  Tibial  spur  formula  0-0-2  (spurs  subequal).  Progressive  proportions  of  leg 
segment  lengths  as  below: 

foreleg:  1.00,  0.84,  0.47,  0.52,  0.63,  0.62,  1.22 
midleg:  1.00,  0.85,  0.40,  0.59,  0.64,  0.67,  1.21 
hindleg:  1.00,  0.90,  0.43,  0.36,  0.59,  0.75,  1.09 

Genitalia  (Fig.  27):  VUIth  stemite  lobes  broadly  rounded,  median  fold  shallow 
and  wide  at  base;  lobe  with  a few  (usually  6-7)  macro  setae.  Spermathecae  3 in  num- 
ber, equal  in  size  and  ovoid  in  shape;  necks  very  short;  ducts  membranous  throughout. 
Accessory  gland  triangular,  very  broad  posteriorly,  tapering  strongly  anteriorly. 

Adult  male  (Figs.  7,  24-26) 

General:  Character  states  as  given  for  female  except  as  follows: 

Size:  Smaller  than  female;  measurements  as  follows:  Wing  length  5.4  (4. 4-6. 2), 
width  1.83  (1.56-2.16).  Head  width  0.86  (0.81-0.94).  Labrum  length  0.25  (0.22- 
0.29).  Palpal  segments  2-5,  lengths  0.12,  0.15,  0.16,  0.44.  Leg  segment  lengths  as 
below: 


fore 

mid 

hind 

femur 

3.3  (2. 9-3.7) 

3.5  (3. 0-3. 9) 

4.7 

(4. 1-5.0) 

tibia 

3.1  (2. 7-3.4) 

2.95  (2. 6-3. 3) 

4.3 

(3. 8-4.6) 

tarsus  1 

1.60  (1.24-1.85) 

1.53  (1.28-1.76) 

1.68 

(1.38-1.87) 

2 

0.82  (0.71-0.92) 

0.77  (0.67-0.89) 

0.56 

(0.46-0.68) 

3 

0.55  (0.39-0.70) 

0.53  (0.41-0.63) 

0.38 

(0.33-0.57) 

4 

0.31  (0.27-0.35) 

0.31  (0.26-0.35) 

0.25 

(0.21-0.35) 

5 

0.31  (0.24-0.41) 

0.29  (0.26-0.33) 

0.27 

(0.23-0.33) 

Head  (Fig.  7):  Parietal  sclerite  without  setae.  Distal  four  palpal  segment  pro- 
portions: 1.0,  1.25,  1.1,  2.75.  Antennal  segment  proportions:  0.63,  0.63,  1.0,  0.69, 
0.81,  0.81,  0.78,  0.81,  0.81,  0.81,  0.78,  0.80,  0.78,  0.76,  0.91;  ultimate  segment 
1.2  length  of  penultimate. 

Legs:  Tibial  spur  formula  0-0-1.  Progressive  proportions  of  leg  segments  as 
below: 

foreleg:  1.00,  0.92,  0.52,  0.51,  0.67,  0.56,  1.00 
midleg:  1.00,  0.85,  0.52,  0.50,  0.69,  0.58,  0.94 
hindleg:  1.00,  0.92,  0.39,  0.33,  0.68,  0.66,  1.08 

Genitalia  (Figs.  24-26):  DCth  tergite  lobes  prominent,  parallel;  lobe  shape  ir- 
regular, generally  quadrate,  outer  corner  pronounced,  rounded,  posterior  margin  hor- 
izontal, with  a mesally  directed  lobe  near  the  middle;  inner  corner  right  angulate,  the 
margin  continuing  straight  to  base;  bristles  numerous  and  regular  over  entire  dorsal 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


21 


surface.  Tegmen  deeply  emarginate  on  either  side  of  strong,  median,  vertical  carina. 
Paramere  broad  basally,  only  slightly  tapering  apically  and  nearly  straight;  both  inner 
and  outer  walls  complete  to  apex;  apex  complex,  a dorso-mesally  directed,  asym- 
metrical hook;  aperture  subterminal.  Penis  filaments  3 in  number,  simple  truncate 
rods,  of  equal  diameter,  all  shorter  than  paramere. 

VARIATION 

The  southernmost  record  for  typical  tenuipes  is  Stoney  Creek,  Giles  County, 
Virginia.  All  specimens  from  localities  further  south  exhibit  certain  states  approaching 
those  found  in  cherokea.  The  most  common  involves  the  shape  of  the  IXth  tergite  lobe 
of  the  male  genitalia  in  which  the  small  mesal  projection  of  the  posterior  margin  is  dis- 
placed strongly  mesad  (Fig.  24)  as  in  cherokea  (Fig.  18).  In  other  specimens,  the 
posterolateral  comer  of  this  same  structure  is  abnormally  pronounced,  a condition  also 
reminiscent  of  cherokea  or  williamsae  (Figs.  18,  28).  The  tegmen  in  some  of  these 
same  specimens  has  very  shallow  excisions  on  either  side  of  the  postero-median  car- 
ina. In  all  the  other  species  the  posterior  margin  of  the  tegmen  is  entire  and  without 
a carina  except  in  cherokea.  All  variants  preserve  the  typical  tenuipes  form  of  the 
apex  of  the  paramere  although  there  are  a few  cherokea  specimens  in  which  the  nor- 
mally simple  apex  is  slightly  extended  and  contorted  in  a fashion  similar  to  the  com- 
plexities found  here  in  tenuipes.  The  existence  of  these  intermediates  suggests  close 
genetic  ties  between  cherokea  and  tenuipes.  Although  the  possibility  of  hybridization 
exists  present  material  is  inadequate  to  reveal  the  real  nature  of  these  relationships. 

Variations  in  the  female  genitalia  are  less  well  defined  and  so  far  involve  only 
three  specimens  in  which  the  number  of  macro  setae  on  the  VUIth  stemite  lobes  and 
configuration  of  the  median  fold  are  unusual. 

REMARKS 

This  is  the  most  common  species  of  Blepharicera  in  Eastern  North  America. 
Since  it  is  the  oldest  named  regional  form,  the  other  similar  species,  especially  cap- 
itata,  have  been  confused  with  it.  These  two  are  indistinguishable  externally,  and  the 
genitalic  characters  cited  in  the  key  must  be  used  to  separate  them. 

DISTRIBUTION  (Fig.  41) 

A map  plot  of  the  records  below  shows  tenuipes  to  be  the  most  widespread  spe- 
cies in  the  group.  It  is  mainly  northern,  although  atypical  specimens,  tentatively  as- 
signed to  this  taxon,  appear  through  the  southernmost  portions  of  the  range  of  the 
genus  in  Tennessee,  North  Carolina  and  Georgia  (see  VARIATION  above). 

There  are  no  records  over  a large  area  north  of  the  Great  Lakes,  but  widely 
disjunct  collections,  to  the  west  at  the  Albany  River,  Ontario  and  eastern  Minnesota, 
and  abundant  suitable  habitats  are  cause  to  believe  that  the  Great  Lakes  region  is  also 
populated  with  tenuipes.  It  is  the  only  species  found  in  the  vicinity  of  Ithaca,  New 
York  where  it  has  long  been  well  known  to  entomologists  and  students  at  Cornell 
University. 

MATERIAL 

Adults.— CANADA.  NOVA  SCOTIA,  Kings  County.  Kentville,  13  July  1924,  R.  P. 
Gorham  (1  9 :CNC).  Victoria  County.  Baddeck,  27  June,  1 July  1936,  J.  McDunnough  (3 


22 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


9 :CNC).  ONTARIO,  Carleton  County.  Ottawa,  19  July  1924,  G.  S.  Walley  (1  9 :CNC);  22- 
23  June  1943,  G.  S.  Walley  (4  9 :CN C);  24  June  1943,  A.  Brooks  (9  9:CNC);  15  June  1951, 
J.  F.  McAlpine  (1  8,  5 9:CNC);  13  July  1956,  J.  R.  Vockeroth  (13  9:CNC).  Shirley  Bay, 
Ottawa,  23  June  1961,  J.  A.  Downes  (4  8,  4 9:CNC);  Brittania,  Ottawa,  15  June  1938,  G. 
E.  Shewell  (1  <3  :CNC).  Remic  Rapids,  Ottawa  River,  18-21  June  1949,  G.  E.  Shewell  (2 
cTCNC).  Wentworth  County.  Dundas,  29  May  1960,  Taylor  and  Wood  (1  8,  1 9 :MMU). 
QUEBEC,  Brome  County.  Glensutton,  17  June  1936,  G.  S.  Walley  (1  9 :CNC).  Knowlton,  8 
July  1929,  L.  J.  Milne  (1  9 :CNC);  13  June  1930,  G.  S.  Walley  (1  <J:CNC).  Gatineau  County. 
Aylmer,  10  June  1924,  26  June  1938,  C.  H.  Curran  (33  9 :AMNH).  Chelsea,  20-25  June  1916 
(2  9 :CU).  Hull,  26  June  1920,  8 July  1923,  Miss.  Cramp,  C.  H.  Curran  (1  6,  1 9:CNC).  Old 
Chelsea,  22  July  1956,  J.  R.  Vockeroth  (3  9:CNC).  Royal  Ottawa  Golf  Club,  Ottawa,  14,  31 
July  1924,  27  June  1932,  F.  P.  Ide,  G.  S.  Walley  (5  9:CNC,  ROM).  Wakefield,  21  August 
1925,  21,  26  July  1926,  G.  S.  Walley  (1  8,  3 9:CNC);  14  June  1926,  28  July  1926,  4 June 
1935,  18  September  1928,  9 July  1946,  F.  P.  Ide  (12  8,  5 9:CNC,  ROM);  1 July  1959,  J.  R. 
Vockeroth  (1  8 :CNC).  Huntingdon  County.  Covey  Hill,  11,  28  June,  4 July  1924,  15,  18  June 
1927,  G.  S.  Walley  (2  8,2  9 :CNC).  Kamouraska  County.  Parke  Reserve,  9 July  1957,  G.  E. 
Shewell  (1  8 :CNC);  8 August  1957,  W.  R.  M.  Mason  (2  9 CNC).  Laprarie  County.  Laprarie, 

8 July  1924,  G.  S.  Walley  (8  9:CNC).  Rouville  County.  Richelieu,  5 July  1927,  G.  S.  Walley 
(1  9:CNC).  Stanstead  County.  Mount  Orford,  14  July  1936,  G.  E.  Shewell  (1  9 :CNC). 
UNITED  STATES . CONNECTICUT , Fairfield  County . Redding,  11  June  1929,  A.  L.  Melander 
(1  9 :USNM).  MAINE,  Hancock  County.  Bar  Harbor,  4 June  1913,  C.  W.  Johnson  (1  9:USNM). 
MINNESOTA,  Cook  County.  Minnesota  “F.  S.”,  Hovland,  23  June  1968,  E.  F.  Cook,  N.J. 
mosquito  trap  (1  cUUSNM).  NEW  JERSEY,  Morris  County.  Brookside,  July,  A.  J.  Weidt  (3 

9 :AMNH,  USNM).  NEW  HAMPSHIRE,  Coos  County.  Bretton  Woods,  1 July  1936,  A.  L. 
Melander  (2  cUUSNM);  Gorham,  18,  20  July  1929,  j.  McDunnough  (2  9 :CNC);  Jefferson 
(black  light  trap),  10  July  1964  (1  9:UNH).  Grafton  County.  Benton,  6 July  1931,  A.  L.  Me- 
lander (5  9 :USNM);  Franconia,  A.  T.  Slosson  (1  8 ,2  9 :USNM,  AMNH);  Noxon  Camp,  2000 
feet,  North  Haverhill,  7 July  1931,  J.  M.  Aldrich  (3  9 :USNM).  County  unknown.  White  Moun- 
tains, July  (1  8 :USNM).  NEW  YORK,  Erie  County.  Colden,  9 July  1922,  23  July  1916,  M. 
C.  Van  Duzee  (2  9 CAS).  Essex  County.  Lake  Placid,  1 July  1922  (5  8 :USNM);  28  Julyl929, 
A.  L.  Melander  (1  d:USNM).  Wilmington  Notch,  Adirondacks,  2 July,  J.  M.  Aldrich  (2 
9 :USNM).  Fulton  County.  Sacandaga,  15  June  1928,  C.P.  Alexander  (2  8 , 1 9 :USNM).  Lewis 
County.  Gomer  Hill,  21  June  1963,  W.  W.  Wirth  (21  8,  3 9 :USNM).  Singing  Waters  Picnic 
Area,  21  June  1963,  W.  W.  Wirth  (3  8,  1 9 :USNM).  Jefferson  County.  Watertown,  J.  Q. 
Adams  (1  9 :USNM).  Saint  Lawrence  County.  Raquette  River,  Colton,  24  June  1963,  W.  W. 
Wirth,  (1  cUUSNM).  Tompkins  County.  Coy  Glen,  18  June  1894,  18  June  1895,  12  June  1920, 
J.  M.  Aldrich  (part)  (48,4  9:LACM,  USNM,  CU).  Fall  Creek,  Ithaca,  10-11  June  1920  (8 
9 :CU).  Ithaca:  23  June  1885,  O.  E.  Pearce  (1  9:CU);  24  June  1901,  J.  M.  Aldrich  (21 
9 :USNM,  AMNH);  21  June-7  July  1901  (2  <3,  8 9 :BMNH).  12,  27-28  June  1901  (20  9:UCR, 
CU);  14  June  1907  (1  9:CU);  July  1908  (4  9 :ANSP);  31  May  1914  (13  8,  3 9:USNM);  14 
June  1914,  12-13,  17,  24  June  1915  (6  9 :CU);  1,  10,  17,  21,  25  June  1916  (3  8,  17  9 :KU, 
USNM,  PSU,  KS,  CU);  13  June  1917,  O.  A.  Johannsen  (8  9 :PSU,  CU);  14  June  1920  (1 
9 :CU);  10  June  1925  (1  9 :CU);  3 June  1967,  R.  Silberglied  (1  9 :CU);  1-7  July,  N.  Banks 
(1  9 :OS);  (3  9:USNM);  May  (6  <?:USNM);  no  dates:  (1  8,  29:  USNM,  CU);  (1  9 :CU); 
Forest  Home,  Ithaca,  30  May  1940,  A.  Stone  (3  <3:USNM).  Taghanic,  Ithaca,  26  June  1920, 
M.  D.  Leonard  (3  9:CU).  PENNSYLVANIA,  Adams  County.  Arendtsville,  27  May,  10  June 
1920,  S.  W.  Frost  (3  9 :CU).  County  unknown.  Castle  Rock,  19  June  1910  (1  9 :USNM).  VIR- 
GINIA, Fairfax  County.  Great  Falls,  19  June  1910,  24  May  1914,  23  May  1918,  21  June  1931, 
30  May  1939,  F.  K.  Knab,  W.  L.  McAtee,  A.  L.  Melander,  C.  T.  Greene  (7  8,  14  9 :USNM). 
Giles  County.  No.  5,  Mountain  Lake  Biological  Station,  1800  feet,  18  June  1965,  G.  W.  Byers 
(2  9 :KU).  Stoney  Creek,  2000  feet,  26  May  1962,  J.  G.  Chillcott  (9  8,5  9 :CNC).  VER- 
MONT, Addison  County.  East  Middlebury,  14  June  1929,  Bishopp  No.  8435  (1  8 :USNM). 
Bennington  County.  Peru,  15  July  1931,  A.  L.  Melander  (1  9 :USNM).  Windham  County.  Hal- 
ifax Gorge,  8 June  1973,  H.  D.  Pratt  (11  <3:HDP,  CPA).  LOCALITY  UNKNOWN.  (1 
9 :INHS). 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


23 


Atypical  adults. — GEORGIA,  Walker  County.  Cloudland  Canyon  State  Park,  8 May  1952, 
G.  S.  Walley  et  al.  (20  6,  7 $:CNC).  NORTH  CAROLINA,  Macon  County.  Highlands,  3- 
5000  feet,  May  1936,  R.  C.  Shannon  (3  cLUSNM).  Same  locality,  3200  feet,  2 July  1958,  J. 
G.  Franclemont  (2  9 :CU).  Swain  County.  Deep  Creek  at  Deep  Creek  Campground,  Great  Smoky 
Mountains  National  Park,  Bryson  City,  21  May  1970,  Wiggins  and  Yamamoto,  700365  (2 
<3:ROM).  TENNESSEE,  Sevier  County.  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park,  18  May  1957, 
J.  R.  Vockeroth  (1  <3:CNC);  Greenbrier  Cove,  2000  feet,  22  May  1938,  I.  Williams  (1 
<3:USNM).  VIRGINIA,  Bath  County.  Blowing  Springs  Camp,  8 mi  W Warm  Springs,  18-20 
May  1963,  Field  and  Flint  (2  c?,  1 9:USNM).  Page  County.  Luray,  21-24  June  1933,  R.  L. 
Melander  (2  <?,  3 9:USNM). 

Pupae  (pharate  adults  dissected). — CANADA.  ONTARIO,  Wentworth  County.  Spencer 
Creek,  27  May  1960,  D.  M.  Wood  (1  6,  6 9,  25  pupae,  4 larvae:CNC).  QUEBEC,  Brome 
County.  Sutton  Mountain  Creek,  11  July  1929,  G.  S.  Walley  (16  pupae:CNC).  UNITED 
STATES.  MAINE,  Somerset  County.  Pleasant  Pond  Stream,  Caratunk,  24  June  1966,  R.  & D. 
Koss  (21  pupae:JH).  MASSACHUSETTS,  Worcester  County.  Fitchburg,  27  May  1871  (44  pu- 
pae:USNM).  NEW  YORK,  Lewis  County.  Gomer  Hill,  21  June  1963,  W.  W.  Wirth  (19  6,  44 
pupae,  15  larvae:USNM). 

Pupae  (atypical  pharate  adults  dissected). — UNITED  STATES.  MARYLAND,  Frederick 
County.  Little  Catoctin  Creek,  1 mi  N Harmony,  30  May  1958,  P.  H.  Freytag  (2  pupae,  1 
larva:OSU).  Little  Hunting  Creek,  4,  17,  25  May  1958,  P.  H.  Freytag  (5  pupae,  24  larvae:OSU). 
Stream  1/2  mi  E Yellow  Springs,  31  May  1958,  P.  H.  Freytag  (8  pupae:OSU).  NORTH  CAR- 
OLINA, Swain  County.  Deep  Creek  Campground,  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park,  Bry- 
son City,  21  May  1970,  Wiggins  & Yamamoto  #700365  (4  pupae,  2 larvae:ROM).  Noland 
Creek,  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park,  24  May  1974,  R.  L.  Green  (1  pupa:LACM). 
VIRGINIA,  Giles  County.  Stoney  Creek,  1800,  2000  feet,  25  May  1962,  J.  R.  Vockeroth  (33 
pupae,  1 larva:CNC).  Madison  County.  White  Oak  Creek,  Shenandoah  National  Park,  24  June 
1959,  B.  D.  Burks  (5  pupae,  4 larvae:USNM). 

BlEPHARICERA  WILL1AMSAE  ALEXANDER 

Blepharocera  williamsae  Alexander  1953:43,  Type  locality  Tennessee,  Sevier  County,  above 
Greenbrier  Cove,  Mount  Leconte,  Great  Smoky  Mountains,  4200  feet  elevation.  Holotype 
female  and  allotype  male  in  Alexander  collection. 

Blepharocera  williamsae , Alexander  1963:57.  Redescription. 

Blepharicera  williamsae.  Stone  1965:99. 


DESCRIPTIONS 
Adult  female  (Figs.  13,  29) 

Size:  A medium-sized  Blepharicera:  measurements  as  follows:  Wing  length  8.1 
(6.75-9.5),  width  2.57  (2. 1-2.9).  Head  width  1.27.  Labrum  length  0.48.  Palpal  seg- 
ments 2-5,  lengths:  0.16,  0.19,  0.18,  0.58.  Leg  segment  lengths  as  below: 


fore 

mid 

hind 

femur 

4.2  (4. 1-5.4) 

4.45  (3.85-5.1) 

6.2 

(5.4-7. 1) 

tibia 

3.5  (3.3-4.55) 

3.6  (3.1-4.15) 

5.5 

(4.85-6.1) 

tarsus  1 

1.84  (1.56-2.09) 

1.61  (1.36-1.80) 

2.25 

(1.96-2.46) 

2 

0.89  (0.81-1.08) 

0.81  (0.65-0.99) 

0.77 

(0.66-0.88) 

3 

0.55  (0.41-0.64) 

0.50  (0.38-0.59) 

0.47 

(0.40-0.54) 

4 

0.36  (0.30-0.44) 

0.34  (0.30-0.41) 

0.33 

(0.28-0.39) 

5 

0.46  (0.40-0.60) 

0.43  (0.35-0.58) 

0.40 

(0.34-0.50') 

24 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


Thoracic  Coloration:  Anterior  pronotum  and  mesoscutum  generally  reddish- 
brown  with  slight  gray  overtone  especially  mesad;  comer  of  posterior  pronotum,  pos- 
teromesal  quadrate  area  of  scutum  and  scutellum  markedly  lighter  than  mesoscutum, 
pale  yellowish-brown;  outer  comers  of  scutellum  darker;  remainder  of  pleuron  brown- 
ish-yellow. 

Head  (Fig.  13):  Parietal  sclerite  with  numerous  (35-50)  setae  over  entire  median 
surface  of  sclerite.  Distal  four  palpal  segment  proportions:  1.0,  1.2,  1.1, 3.6.  Antennal 
segment  proportions:  0.77,  0.78,  1.0,  0.77,  0.80,  0.80,  0.80,  0.80,  0.80,  0.80,  0.74, 
0.74,  0.68,  0.62,  0.99;  ultimate  segment  1.60  length  of  penultimate. 

Legs:  Tibial  spur  formula  0-0-2  (spurs  subequal).  Progressive  proportions  of  leg 
segment  lengths  as  below: 

foreleg:  1.00,  0.82,  0.53,  0.48,  0.62,  0.66,  1.26 
midleg:  1.00,  0.81,  0.45,  0.50,  0.62,  0.67,  1.27 
hindleg:  1.00,  0.89,  0.33,  0.34,  0.61,  0.63,  1.18 

Genitalia  (Fig.  29):  VUIth  stemite  lobes  disjunct,  broadly  rounded,  median 
fold  U-shaped,  the  basal  comers  angular;  lobe  without  macro  setae,  a pair  of  micro 
setae  on  either  side  of  midline  on  bridge  between  lobes.  Spermathecae  3 in  number, 
equal  in  size  and  ovoid  in  shape;  necks  very  short;  ducts  membranous  throughout. 
Accessory  gland  a slightly  inflated,  elongate  tube. 

Adult  male  (Figs.  8,  28) 

General:  Character  states  as  given  for  female  except  as  follows: 

Size:  Smaller  than  female;  measurements  as  follows:  Wing  length  5.6  (4. 9-6. 6), 
width  1.85  (1.65-2.05).  Head  width  0.85.  Labrum  length  0.25.  Palpal  segments  2-5, 
lengths:  0.10,  0.14,  0.14,  0.52.  Leg  segment  lengths  as  below: 


fore 

mid 

hind 

femur 

3.4 

(2.75-4.0) 

3.7 

(3.45-4.2) 

4.8 

(4. 5-5. 5) 

tibia 

3.3 

(3. 1-3.7) 

3.1 

(2.85-3.55) 

4.5 

(4. 1-5.3) 

tarsus  1 

1.78 

(1.60-2.09) 

1.61 

(1.45-1.89) 

1.70 

(1.48-2.00) 

2 

0.83 

(0.68-0.96) 

0.78 

(0.67-0.90) 

0.56 

(0.49-0.63) 

3 

0.58 

(0.52-0.65) 

0.55 

(0.47-0.63) 

0.37 

(0.31-0.57) 

4 

0.31 

(0.29-0.35) 

0.30 

(0.28-0.34) 

0.25 

(0.21-0.31) 

5 

0.30 

(0.25-0.34) 

0.29 

(0.26-0.31) 

0.27 

(0.25-0.30) 

Head  (Fig.  8):  Parietal  sclerite  with  6-7  setae  in  dorsolateral  portion  of  sclerite. 
Distal  four  palpal  segment  proportions:  1.0,  1.4,  1.4,  5.6.  Antennal  segment  pro- 
portions: 0.70,  0.72,  1.0,  0.76,  0.97,  1.01,  0.94,  0.96,  0.96,  0.99,  0.96,  0.98,  0.96, 
0.88,  1.11;  ultimate  segment  1.3  length  of  penultimate. 

Legs:  Tibial  spur  formula  0-0-1.  Progressive  proportions  of  leg  segment  lengths 
as  below: 

foreleg:  1.00,  0.96,  0.54,  0.42,  0.70,  0.55,  0.95 
midleg:  1.00,  0.81,  0.52,  0.49,  0.70,  0.55,  0.94 
hindleg:  1.00,  0.93,  0.38,  0.33,  0.66,  0.68,  1.06 

Genitalia  (Fig.  28):  IXth  tergite  lobes  very  prominent,  slightly  convergent;  lobe 
shape  irregular,  outer  comer  acutely  rounded,  posterior  margin  oblique,  projecting 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


25 


posteriorly  as  an  angulate  lobe,  inner  margin  strongly  inflated  mesally,  i.e.  strongly 
curved  to  a narrowed  base;  bristles  numerous  and  regular  over  entire  dorsal  surface. 
Tegmen  entire.  Paramere  broad  basally,  tapering  to  distal  four-fifths  where  abruptly 
narrowed  (outer  wall  terminating);  apex  acute  and  incurved;  aperture  subapical,  at 
termination  of  outer  wall.  Penis  filaments  3 in  number,  equal  in  length,  shorter  than 
parameres,  all  simple,  truncate  rods,  median  much  heavier  basally  than  laterals. 

REMARKS 

This  is  the  largest  species  of  the  Tenuipes  Group,  although  of  average  size  for 
the  genus.  In  addition  to  diagnostic  characteristics  found  in  the  genitalia  of  both  sexes 
(see  keys),  the  adults  appear  distinctive,  even  to  the  naked  eye,  because  of  the  light 
brown  prescutellar  quadrate  area  of  the  scutum.  The  scuta  of  all  the  other  species  are 
more  or  less  unicolorous. 

DISTRIBUTION  (Fig.  42) 

B.  williamsae  is  known  only  from  the  extreme  southern  portion  of  the  Appala- 
chians at  the  confluence  of  Georgia,  Tennessee  and  the  Carolinas. 

MATERIAL 

Adults. — GEORGIA,  Lumpkin  County.  De  Soto  Falls  State  Park,  upper  falls,  28  April 
1973,  H.  D.  Pratt  (5  6 :HDP).  NORTH  CAROLINA,  Macon  County.  Highlands,  3-5000  feet, 
April-May  1936,  R.  C.  Shannon  (18  6 , 17  9,  4 pupae:USNM).  Clear  Creek,  Highlands,  3200 
feet,  1-2  July  1958,  J.  G.  Franclemont  (19  9:CU).  County  unknown.  Bubbling  Spring  Creek, 
5100  feet,  17  July  1957,  J.  G.  Chillcott  (1  $ :CNC).  TENNESSEE,  Sevier  County.  Great  Smoky 
Mountains  National  Park,  Greenbrier  Cove,  2000  feet,  18  May  1957,  W.  R.  M.  Mason  (2 
9:CNC);  same  locality,  2-2500  feet,  22  April  1939,  15  May  1938,  I.  W.  Williams  (<3  AL- 
LOTYPE, 2 6 , 3 9 PARATYPES:USNM);  upper  Greenbrier  Cove,  slopes  Mount  Leconte, 
4200  feet,  5 June  1939,  C.  P.  Alexander  (9  HOLOTYPE:CPA). 

Pupae  (pharate  adults  dissected). — UNITED  STATES.  TENNESSEE,  Sevier  County. 
Greenbrier  Cove,  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park,  22  May  1938,  A.  C.  Cole  (14  pu- 
pae:UT).  Oconaluftee  River  near  Alum  Cave  Bluffs,  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park,  8 
July  1974,  D.  & M.  Davis  (10  pupae:USNM). 


TAXONOMY -PUPAE 

The  difficulties  of  distinguishing  pupae  because  of  their  similarity  among  all  the 
species  (excepting  species  F)  was  mentioned  earlier.  Size  may  be  used  when  there  is 
reason  to  believe  the  sample  contains  disparate  forms.  Otherwise,  since  length-width 
ratios  are  constant  and  length  is  a continuum  from  the  smallest  males  to  the  largest 
females,  one  must  dissect  the  pharate  adults  to  identify  pupae.  (Size  data  on  samples 
of  known  species  are  given  in  Table  I). 

DESCRIPTION 

General. — Typical  in  basic  structure  for  genus  Blepharicera.  Outline  shape 
ovate,  cross  section  hemi-oval.  Size.  — 6 3. 6-4. 7;  9 4.7-5. 7 mm.  Color  (in  life). 
— Upper  surface  evenly  black;  lower  surface  white.  Structure. — Dorsal  cuticle  of 
metascutal,  scutellar  and  abdominal  sclerites,  as  well  as  small  area  immediately  an- 


26 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


Table  I 

Blepharicera,  Tenuipes  Group.  Size  of  pupae 
(mean  lengths  in  mm).  N.a.  = not  available. 

d 

.9 

B.  capitata 

n.a. 

n.a. 

B.  cherokea 

n.a. 

n.a. 

B.  diminutiva 

n.a. 

n.  a. 

B.  similans 

3.62 

4.70 

B.  tenuipes 

4.37 

5.04 

B.  williamsae 

4.74 

5.65 

B.  species  F 

n.a. 

4.7 

terior  to  branchial  lamellae  on  branchial  sclerite,  finely  and  densely  papillate;  re- 
mainder of  dorsum  smooth  or  weakly  wrinkled.  Branchiae  parallel,  widely  separated; 
posture  erect,  composed  of  4 elongate,  apically  rounded,  rigid  plates;  all  plates  of 
equal  length;  internal  pair  more  weakly  sclerotized  than  external.  Antennal  cases  of 
both  sexes  extending  to  less  than  half  the  length  of  wing  cases. 

The  material  for  this  project  includes  one  specimen  which  deviates  from  all  the 
others  in  the  form  of  the  tergites  of  abdominal  segments  I-V.  These  sclerites,  instead 
of  forming  a flat  arch  across  the  midline,  possess  a low,  cone-shaped  prominence 
anteromedially;  a similar,  but  lower  and  broader  prominence  arises  from  the  scutellar 
sclerite.  The  processes  are  presumedly  homologous  to  those  on  the  mid  dorsum  of 
“Larva  F.” 

TAXONOMY-LARVAE 

Six  types  of  larvae  are  distinguishable  in  the  material  assembled  for  this  study. 
Because  none  could  be  definitely  associated  with  adults,  their  identities  are  tentative 
and  in  3 cases  still  so  uncertain  that  they  can  only  be  guessed. 

DESCRIPTION 

General. — Typical  in  basic  structure  for  genus  Blepharicera . Size. — Body 
length  (prepupal)  5-7  mm.  Width  of  head  capsule  1.2-1. 5 mm.  Color. — Pigmentation 
usually  pale,  yellowish,  sometimes  medium  brown.  Sclerotized  structures  medium  to 
dark  brown.  Structure. — Intercalary  segments  present.  Head  capsule  with  complete 
incision  in  lateralia.  Antennae  very  short  and  with  two  sclerotized  rings.  Dorsal  pseu- 
dopods absent.  No  dorsal  spines,  sclerotized  plates  or  processes  of  any  kind  present 
(one  species  with  middorsal  coniform  swellings).  Ventrolateral  gills  with  7 filaments 
(6  occasionally  on  terminal  division).  Chaetotaxy . — Integument  dorsally  set  with  nu- 
merous secondary,  coniform  or  claviform  sensilla,  primary  sensilla  recognizable  as 
follows:  tp  M-T,  members  of  pairs  disjunct;  ss  P-T,  that  of  P out  of  line  laterad  with 
those  of  M-T;  st,  inner  tp,  and  dpod  I- VII. 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


27 


Larva  A 

(Tentatively  B.  tenuipes ) 

DESCRIPTION 

Fourth  instar  larva  (Fig.  30):  Body  length  6.9  mm;  head  width  1.48  mm.  Sec- 
ondary dorsal  sensilla  short,  elongate-claviform;  arranged  in  two  irregular  transverse 
rows  on  trunk  divisions  and  abdomen  I;  a single  row  on  each  thoracic  segment;  rows 
confluent  and  sensilla  general  laterally,  some  setiform  sensilla  mixed.  Recognizable 
primary  sensilla  all  setiform  except  t P-M  which  are  subchaetiform. 

MATERIAL  (Fig.  41) 

Larvae  (and  accompanying  immature  pupae) . — CANADA . NEWFOUNDLAND.  Baie 
Verte  River,  23  June  1971,  S.  W.  Frost  (4  larvae:CNC).  ONTARIO,  Carleton  County.  Cun- 
ningham and  Riopelle  Islands,  Remic  Rapids,  18  May,  6 June  1949  (3  pupae,  14  larvae:CNC). 
Renfrew  County.  Petawawa,  rapids  belong  Highway  17  bridge,  28  April  1959,  G.  E.  Shewell 
(5  pupae,  3 larvae:CNC).  Timiskaming  County.  Kelly  Creek,  Highway  101,  28.8  mi  W Timmins, 
23  May  1972,  ROM  field  party  No.  720183  (14  larvae:ROM).  Wentworth  County.  Spencer 
Creek,  below  falls,  Ontario  Railway  Station,  Dundas,  13  May  1954  (2  pupae,  6 larvae:USNM). 
QUEBEC,  Saguenay  County.  Baie-Comeau,  11  June  1963,  H.  C.  Connell  (15  larvae:CNC). 
STATE  and  County  UNKNOWN.  Bug  River  Rapids,  21  June  1951  (8  pupae,  5 larvae:USNM). 
UNITED  STATES.  MARYLAND,  Frederick  County.  Catoctin  Creek,  1 mi  N Little  Catoctin, 
Harmony,  30  May  1958,  P.  H.  Freytag  (1  larva:OSU).  Garrett  County.  Savage  River  at  Big 
Run  Campground,  17  April  1968,  Yamamoto  & Odum  (1  larva:ROM). 

REMARKS 

Determination  of  this  larva  seems  fairly  certain  because  of  its  wide  occurrence 
in  areas  occupied  exclusively  by  tenuipes.  A significant  locality  in  this  respect  is 
Ithaca,  New  York,  where  the  numerous  collections  of  all  stages  have  never  contained 
any  deviant  forms. 

Larva  B 

(Tentatively  B.  similans) 


DESCRIPTION 

Fourth  instar  larva  (Fig.  33):  Body  length  5.1  mm;  head  width  1.22  mm.  Sec- 
ondary dorsal  sensilla  short,  extremely  capitate  (almost  spherical  in  some),  the  largest 
apically  dentate;  arranged  in  two  irregular  transverse  rows  on  trunk  divisions  and  ab- 
domen I;  a single  row  on  each  thoracic  segment;  rows  confluent  laterally  and  where 
sensilla  setiform  mixed  and  general.  Usually  one  conspicuously  large,  secondary  clav- 
iform  sensillum  in  dorsolateral  area.  Recognizable  primary  sensilla  all  setiform. 

MATERIAL  (Fig.  40) 

Larvae  (and  accompanying  immature  pupae).  — CANADA.  QUEBEC,  Brome  County.  Sut- 
ton Mountain  Creek,  11  July  1929,  G.  S.  Walley  (19  larvae:CNC).  UNITED  STATES.  MAINE, 
Somerset  County.  Pleasant  Pond  Stream,  Caratunk,  24  June  1966,  R.  & D.  Koss  (78  larvae:JH). 
MARYLAND,  Garrett  County.  “CCXXXIV  falls,  muddy  creek”,  25  August  1965,  J.  Glime 
(1  larva:USNM).  MASSACHUSETTS,  Berkshire  County.  Bashbish  Creek,  6 July  1950,  A. 
Stone  (4  pupae,  12  larvae:USNM).  NEW  HAMPSHIRE,  Coos  County.  Creek  on  way  to  Glen 


28 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


House,  18  July  1929,  G.  S.  Walley  (1  pupa,  3 larvae:CNC).  NORTH  CAROLINA,  Jackson 
County.  3 mi  E Balsam,  3400  feet,  11  July  1974,  D.  & M.  Davis  (12  larvae:USNM).  Swain 
County.  Deep  Creek  at  Deep  Creek  Campground,  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park,  Bryson 
City,  21  May  1970,  Wiggins  & Yamamoto  No.  700365  (10  larvae:ROM).  TENNESSEE,  Sevier 
County.  Gatlinburg,  fork  Little  Pigeon  River,  27  May  1934,  T.  H.  Frison  (3  larvae:INHS). 
Greenbrier  Cove,  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park,  18  May  1952,  H.  B.  Reed  (53  lar- 
vae:UT).  VIRGINIA,  Giles  County.  Big  Stony  Creek,  Kimballton,  26  May  1962,  C.  V.  Coveil 
(1  pupa,  3 larvae:UL).  Sinking  Creek,  29  May  1941,  A.  Stone  No.  Ill  (6  pupae,  10 
larvae:USNM).  Highland  County.  Cowpasture  River,  3 mi  N Williamsville,  27  July  1974,  M. 
M.  Davis  (1  pupa,  11  larvae:USNM).  Madison  County.  White  Oak  Creek,  Shenandoah  National 
Park,  24  June  1951,  B.  O.  Burks  (8  larvae:USNM). 

REMARKS 

Identification  of  this  form  is  fairly  certain  and  based  upon  several  widely  spaced 
collections  of  larvae  accompanying  pupae  with  clearly  recognizable  pharate  adults 
(see  MATERIAL  under  account  of  similans ). 

Larva  C 

(Species  Undetermined) 


DESCRIPTION 

Fourth  instar  larva  (Fig.  35):  Body  length  6.4  mm;  head  width  1.33  mm.  Sec- 
ondary dorsal  sensilla  long,  attenuo-claviform;  arranged  generally  over  each  division 
but  tending  to  form  transverse  rows  especially  on  thoracic  segments;  also  fewer  across 
trunk  segments  slightly  posterior  to  a mid-transverse  line;  laterally  mixed  with  seti- 
form  sensilla.  Recognizable  primary  sensilla  all  setiform. 

MATERIAL  (Fig.43) 

Larvae  (and  accompanying  immature  pupae).  — UNITED  STATES.  GEORGIA,  Lumpkin 
County.  Hightower  River,  11  April  1941,  A.  Stone  No.  21  (5  larvae:USNM).  Union  County. 
Vogel  State  Park,  11  April  1941,  A.  Stone  No.  18  (9  larvae:USNM).  MARYLAND,  Frederick 
County.  Cunningham  Falls  State  Park,  15  April  1973,  P.  & P.  Spangler  (23  larvae:USNM). 
Garrett  County.  Ginsend  Run,  4 May  1965,  J.  Glime  (2  larvae:MSU).  Sang  Run  Crossing,  Sang 
Run  Road,  17  April  1968,  Yamamoto  & Odum  (6  larvae:ROM).  VIRGINIA,  Alleghany  County. 
Tributary  Jackson  River  beside  Route  220  just  N Covington,  18  April  1968,  Yamamoto  & Odum 
(1  larva:ROM).  Potts  Creek,  3 mi  SW  Jordan  Mines,  18  April  1968,  Yamamoto  & Odum  (9 
larvae:ROM).  Amherst  County.  Tributary  of  James  River  beside  Blue  Ridge  Parkway  near  junc- 
tion with  Route  501,  19  April  1968,  Yamamoto  & Odum  (3  larvae:ROM).  Bath  County.  Stream 
in  Blowing  Springs  Recreation  Area  on  Route  39,  18  April  1968,  Yamamoto  & Odum  (6  lar- 
vae:ROM).  Floyd  County.  Little  Indian  Creek,  Copper  Valley,  24  April  1966,  P.  & B.  Wy- 
godzinsky  (6  larvae:AMNH).  Giles  County.  Big  Stony  Creek,  Kimballton,  Station  2,  14  April, 
5 May  1962,  C.  V.  Covell  (4  pupae,  25  larvae:UL).  Sinking  Creek,  29  May  1941,  A.  Stone 
No.  Ill  (1  larva:USNM).  Green  County.  Swift  Run,  5 mi  W Standardsville,  Highway  Route 
33,  17  May  1970,  R.  W.  Koss  (10  pupae,  15  larvae:JH).  Lydia,  20  April  1938,  R.  Burks  (3 
larvae:INHS).  Madison  County.  Oak  Creek,  Shenandoah  National  Park,  6 May  1951,  B.  D. 
Burks  (5  larvae:USNM).  White  Oak  Canyon,  Skyline  Drive,  6 May  1951,  Burks  & Sommerman 
(2  larvae:USNM).  Rappahannock  County.  Thornton  River,  Shenandoah  National  Park,  15,  20, 
26  April  1961,  O.  & R.  Flint  (1  pupa,  29  larvae:USNM).  Shenandoah  County.  Passage  Creek, 
Camp  Roosevelt,  21  May  1973,  S.  Fiance  (3  larvae:USNM).  STATE  and  County  UNKNOWN. 
Treasler  Run,  Aitkin  Farms,  29  April  1951,  S.  W.  Frost  (9  larvae:PSU). 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


29 


REMARKS 

The  distribution  of  this  form  coincides  approximately  with  that  of  the  atypical 
type  of  tenuipes  (see  VARIATION  under  that  species)  and  may  represent  its  larva. 
If  this  proves  to  be  the  case,  its  distinctiveness  and  constancy  detract  from  the  hy- 
pothesis of  hybrid  origin  for  that  type  and  suggest  that  a separate  species  or  subspecies 
is  present. 


Larva  D 

(Tentatively  B.  williamsae ) 


DESCRIPTION 

Fourth  instar  larva  (Fig.  31). — Body  length  6.7  mm;  head  width  1.43  mm.  Sec- 
ondary dorsal  sensilla  short,  lanceolate;  arranged  generally  over  each  division  but 
tending  to  form  transverse  rows  on  thoracic  segments;  mixed  with  chaetiform  sensilla 
only  near  lateral  margin.  Recognizable  primary  sensilla  all  setiform  except  t P-I  and 
st  V-VI  which  are  cylindriform.  Specimens  are  often  more  darkly  pigmented  dorso- 
mesally  than  laterally  and  present  a longitudinally  banded  appearance. 

MATERIAL  (Fig.  42) 

Larvae  (and  accompanying  immature  pupae).  — UNITED  STATES.  GEORGIA,  Dawson 
County.  Amicalola  Falls,  11  April  1941,  A.  Stone  (2  larvae:USNM).  Gilmer  County.  Little 
Turnip  Town  Creek,  Walnut  Mountain  Development,  13  March  1974,  H.  D.  Pratt  (6  pupae,  6 
larvae :HDP).  Rabun  County.  Tallulah  River  at  Tallulah  River  Campground,  S Tate  City,  17 
May  1970,  Wiggins  & Yamamoto  (1  larva:ROM).  Union  County.  Chestatee  River,  11  April 
1941,  A.  Stone  (1  larva:USNM).  NORTH  CAROLINA,  McDowell  County.  Woodlawn,  23 
March  1940,  Frison,  Mohr  & Hawkins  (3  larvae:INHS).  Swain  County.  New  Found  Gap,  3560 
feet,  28  May  1934,  T.  H.  Frison  (6  pupae,  6 larvae:INHS).  SOUTH  CAROLINA,  Oconee 
County.  Howard  Creek,  6 February  1976,  R.  L.  Green  & D.  A.  Braatz  (5  larvae:LACM).  TEN- 
NESSEE, Sevier  County.  Campground  near  Chimneys,  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park, 
11  May  1944,  Frison  & Ross  (16  larvae:INHS).  Stream  10.2  mi  E Gatlinburg  entrance  on  Route 
441,  20  May  1970,  Wiggins  & Yamamoto  No.  700361  (10  larvae:ROM).  Greenbrier  Cove, 
Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park,  13  February  1938,  A.  C.  Cole  (47  larvae:UT);  18  March 
1939,  A.  C.  Cole  (2  larvae:INHS).  Small  stream  0.8  mi  W New  Found  Gap  on  Route  441,  20 
May  1970,  Wiggins  & Yamamoto  No.  700359  (2  larvae:ROM). 

REMARKS 

Coincidence  of  large  size  and  larval  collections  with  the  adults  of  williamsae 
strongly  suggest  the  identity  of  that  species  with  this  form. 

Larva  E 

(Species  Undetermined) 


DESCRIPTION 

Fourth  instar  larva  (Fig.  32). — Body  length  5.9  mm;  head  width  1.64  mm.  Sec- 
ondary dorsal  sensilla  all  setiform  (except  for  occasional  claviform  shapes  on  thoracic 
segments  in  some  specimens);  arranged  in  two  irregular  rows  on  trunk  divisions  and 
abdomen  I;  a single  row  on  each  thoracic  segment;  rows  confluent  and  sensilla  general 


30 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


laterally.  Recognizable  primary  sensilla  all  setiform  and  similar  to  secondary  sensilla 
except  for  larger  size. 

MATERIAL  (Fig.  44) 

Larvae.  — CANADA.  ONTARIO,  Parry  Sound  County.  Cashman  Creek  crossing  Highway 
518  at  Sand  Lake,  1 June  1972,  ROM  field  party,  No.  720212  (1  larva:ROM).  UNITED  STATES . 
MINNESOTA,  Lake  County.  Split  Rock  Creek,  2 mi  W Lake  Superior,  16  May  1952,  J.  Ger- 
berich  (6  larvae:OSU).  VIRGINIA,  Giles  County.  Big  Stony  Creek,  Station  2,  Kimballton,  5 
May  1962,  C.  V.  Coveil  (1  larva:UL).  STATE  and  County  UNKNOWN.  Stillwater  Creek,  13 
June  1961  (1  larva:USNM). 

REMARKS 

I have  no  idea  of  the  identity  of  this  form.  It  is  sympatric  only  with  tenuipes, 
but  since  the  larva  of  that  species  is  known,  larva  E would  appear  to  belong  to  an 
unknown  entity. 


Larva  F 

(Species  Undetermined) 


DESCRIPTION 

Fourth  instar  larva  (Figs.  34,  36). — Body  length  5.8  mm;  head  width  1.25  mm. 
A conspicuous  median  conical  protuberance  on  each  trunk  division  and  abdomen  I. 
Posterolateral  lobes  of  terminal  division  poorly  developed,  terminal  incision  very  shal- 
low. Secondary  dorsal  sensilla  claviform;  arranged  generally  on  all  divisions  except 
for  4-6  larger  sensilla  grouped  tightly  at  apex  of  each  coniform  process;  lateral  sensilla 
mostly  setiform.  Recognizable  primary  sensilla  well  marked,  all  setiform  except  for 
t P-T  and  t V-VI  which  are  cylindriform. 

MATERIAL  (Fig.  44> 

Larvae  (and  accompanying  immature  pupa).  — CANADA.  NEW  BRUNSWICK,  Charlotte 
County.  Saint  Stephen,  27  June  1965,  G.  E.  Shewed  (1  pupa,  2 larvae:CNC).  UNITED  STATES. 
GEORGIA,  Lumpkin  County.  Hightower  River,  11  April  1941,  A.  Stone  No.  21  (11 
larvae:USNM).  MAINE,  Somerset  County.  Pleasant  Pond  Stream,  Caratunk,  24  June  1966,  R. 
& D.  Koss  (1  larva:JH).  NORTH  CAROLINA,  Avery  County.  Linville  River  at  Linville  Falls 
Campground,  Blue  Ridge  Parkway,  22  May  1970,  Wiggins  & Yamamoto  No.  700369  (11  lar- 
vae:ROM).  Swain  County.  Deep  Creek  at  Deep  Creek  Campground,  Great  Smoky  Mountains 
National  Park,  Bryson  City,  21  May  1970,  Wiggins  & Yamamoto  No.  700365  (2  larvae:ROM). 
Noland  Creek,  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park,  24  May  1974,  R.  L.  Green  (1  larva:LACM). 
VIRGINIA,  Bath  County.  Stream  in  Blowing  Springs  Recreation  Area  on  Route  39,  18  April 
1968,  Yamamoto  & Odum  (1  larva:ROM). 


REMARKS 

Unfortunately  the  female  dissected  from  the  single  pupa  available  of  this  form 
was  immature  and  not  identifiable.  Because  of  its  great  latitudinal  range  it  seems 
unlikely  that  it  belongs  to  either  capitata,  cherokea  or  diminutiva,  all  species  now 
known  to  have  restricted  distribution.  Possibly  another  new  species  is  indicated. 


1 


CHARACTERS  for  explanation  of  abbreviations. 


32 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


Figures  3-8:  Anterior  view  of  head  capsules  of  male  Blepharicera:  3.  B.  capitata.  4. 
B.  cherokea.  5.  B.  diminutiva.  6.  B.  similans.  7 . B.  tenuipes.  8.  B.  williamsae. 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


33 


10.  B.  cherokea.  11.  B.  diminutiva.  12.  B.  similans.  13.  B.  williamsae. 


34 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


Figures  14-15:  Terminology  of  head  capsule,  Blepharicera  tenuipes , female:  14.  An- 
terior view.  15.  Posterior  view,  mouthparts  omitted. 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


35 


Figures  16-21:  Male  (left)  and  female  (right)  genitalia  of  Blepharicera:  16-17.  B. 
capitata.  18-19.  B.  cherokea.  20-21.  B.  diminutiva. 


36 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


Figures  22-29:  Male  (left)  and  female  (right)  genitalia  of  Blepharicera  (continued): 
22-23.  B.  similans.  24-27.  B.  tenuipes  (24.  Ninth  tergite  lobes  of  “southern  type”; 
25.  Three  views  of  apex  of  paramere  of  male  genitalia).  28-29.  B.  williamsae. 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


37 


Figures  30-36:  Fourth  instar  larvae  of  Blephar ic era,  34.  lateral  view  of  Larva  F (spe- 
cies undetermined),  remainder  dorsal  view  of  left  side  of  third  abdominal  segment 
showing  details  of  chaetotaxy.  30.  Larva  A (probably  tenuipes ).  31.  B.  williamsae. 
32.  Larva  E (species  undetermined).  33.  Larva  B (probably  similans ).  35.  Larva  C 
(species  undetermined).  36.  Larva  F (species  undetermined). 


38 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


Figures  37-40.  Distribution  of  Blepharicera  in  eastern  North  America.  Points  indicate 
Joci  of  collections,  line  encloses  probable  total  range.  37.  Typical  B.  capitata  (dots) 
and  “separata”  type  (squares).  38.  B.  diminutiva.  39.  B.  cherokea.  40.  B.  similans 
adults  (dots)  and  larvae  (triangles). 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


39 


Figures  41-44.  Distribution  of  Blepharicera  in  eastern  North  America  (continued). 
Points  indicate  loci  of  collections,  line  encloses  probable  total  range.  41.  Typical 
B.  tenuipes  adults  (dots),  southern  type  (squares)  and  larvae  (triangles).  42.  B.  wil- 
liamsae  adults  (dots)  and  larvae  (triangles).  43.  Larva  C.  44.  Larva  E (triangles  and 
larva  F (squares). 


40 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  291 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

This  study  is  based  on  1869  specimens  (773  adults,  1096  larvae  and  pupae).  For 
the  use  of  this  material  I wish  to  acknowledge  the  following  repositories  (listed  al- 
phabetically by  the  acronym  used  in  citing  specimens  in  the  text  above)  and  thank 
their  respective  curators  who  kindly  arranged  loans  and  provided  much  information: 
AMNH  - American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Pedro  Wygodzinsky. 

ANSP  - Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia,  Harold  Grant  (deceased). 

BMNH  - British  Museum,  Natural  History,  Paul  Freeman. 

CAS  - California  Academy  of  Sciences,  Paul  H.  Arnaud. 

CNC  - Canadian  National  Collection,  B.  V.  Peterson. 

CPA  - Private  collection  of  Charles  P.  Alexander,  Amherst,  Massachusetts. 

CU  - Cornell  University,  L.  L.  Pechuman. 

DPC  - Duke  Power  Company,  Environmental  Laboratories.  R.  Lynn  Green. 
HDP  - Private  collection  of  Harry  D.  Pratt,  Atlanta,  Georgia. 

INHS  - Illinois  Natural  History  Survey,  R.  T.  Allen. 

JH  - Johns  Hopkins  University,  Richard  Koss. 

KS  - Kansas  State  University,  Norman  Marston. 

KU  - University  of  Kansas,  Snow  Entomological  Museum,  George  W.  Byers. 
LACM  - Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County. 

MCZ  - Harvard  University,  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Philip  J. 

Darlington. 

MMU  - McMaster  University. 

MSU  - Michigan  State  University,  Roland  L.  Fischer  and  Frederick  W.  Stehr. 
OS  - Oregon  State  University,  J.  D.  Lattin. 

OSU  - Ohio  State  University,  Paul  Freytag. 

PSU  - Pennsylvania  State  University. 

ROM  - Royal  Ontario  Museum,  Glenn  B.  Wiggins. 

UCR  - University  of  California,  Riverside,  Saul  Frommer. 

UL  - University  of  Louisville,  Charles  V.  Covell,  Jr. 

USNM  - U.S.  National  Museum  of  Natural  History  Collection,  Alan  Stone,  F. 

Christian  Thompson,  and  W.  W.  Wirth,  Agricultural  Research  Service, 
United  States  Department  of  Agriculture. 

UNH  - University  of  New  Hampshire,  J.  G.  Conklin. 

UT  - University  of  Tennessee,  Arthur  C.  Cole,  Jr. 

I wish  also  to  express  my  great  appreciation  for  the  help  generously  donated  by 
both  Charlotte  Low  (preparation  of  specimens  and  compilation  of  statistical  data)  and 
Carol  Madle  (assistance  with  illustrations  and  rendering  of  figures  12-13).  D.  A.  Craig 
kindly  made  available  specimens  of  first  instar  Neocurupira  chiltoni. 

Finally,  I extend  my  thanks  to  my  colleagues  Julian  P.  Donahue,  Roy  R.  Snelling 
and  members  of  the  review  and  editorial  committees  for  criticism  of  the  manuscript. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Aldrich,  J.  M.  1905.  A catalogue  of  North  American  Diptera  (or  two-winged  flies).  Smith. 
Misc.  Colls.  46(1 444):  1-680. 


1978 


Blephariceridae  Eastern  North  America 


41 


Alexander,  C.  P.  1953.  Undescribed  species  of  nematocerous  Diptera.  Part  II.  Brooklyn  En- 
tomol.  Soc.,  B.  48:41-49. 

1963.  Blepharoceridae  and  Deuterophlebiidae  in  Guide  to  the  insects  of  Connecticut. 

Part  VI.  The  Diptera  or  true  flies.  Fasc.  8,  pp.  39-83. 

Comstock,  J.  H.  and  A.  B.  Comstock.  1895.  A Manual  for  the  Study  of  Insects.  Comstock 
Pub.  Co.,  Ithaca. 

Craig,  D.  A.  1967.  The  eggs  and  embryology  of  some  New  Zealand  Blephariceridae  (Diptera, 
Nematocera)  with  reference  to  the  embryology  of  other  nematocera.  Roy.  Soc.  New  Zea- 
land, Trans.  8:191-206. 

Hogue,  C.  L.  1973.  The  net-winged  midges  or  Blephariceridae  of  California.  Calif.  Insect  Sur- 
vey, B.  15:1-83. 

Hora,  S.  L.  1930.  Biology,  bionomics  and  evolution  of  the  torrential  fauna,  with  special  ref- 
erence to  the  organs  of  attachment.  Roy.  Soc.  London,  Phil.  Trans.  Ser.  B.  218:217-282. 

Johannsen,  O.  A.  1903.  Aquatic  nematocerous  Diptera.  New  York  State  Mus.,  B.  68:328- 
441. 

1929.  A new  species  of  Blepharocera  from  Massachusetts  (Diptera).  Psyche  36:123- 

124. 

1934.  Aquatic  Diptera.  Part  I.  Nemocera,  exclusive  of  Chironomidae  and  Cerato- 

pogonidae.  Cornell  Univ.  Agric.  Expt.  Sta.,  Mem.  164:1-71,  pis.  I-XXIV. 

Kellogg,  V.  L.  1900.  Notes  on  the  life-history  and  structure  of  Blepharocera  capitata  Loew. 
Entomol.  News  11:305-318. 

1903.  The  net-winged  midges  (Blepharoceridae)  of  North  America.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci., 

Proc.  3rd  series  3:187-233. 

1907.  Diptera.  Fam.  Blepharoceridae.  Genera  Insectorum  56:1-15. 

Loew,  H.  1863.  Diptera  americae  septentrionalis  indigena.  Centuria  quarta.  Berliner  Entomo- 
logischer  Zeitschrift  7:275-326. 

Osten  Sacken,  C.  R.  1895.  Contributions  to  the  study  of  the  Liponeuridae  Loew  (Blepharo- 
ceridae Loew,  olim).  Berliner  Entomologischer  Zeitschrift  40:148-169. 

Riley,  C.  V.  1881.  Notes  on  Blepharoceridae.  Amer.  Natur.  15:438-447,  748. 

Stone,  A.  1965.  Family  Blephariceridae.  Pages  99-100  in  Stone,  A.,  C.  W.  Sabrosky,  W.  W. 
Wirth,  R.  H.  Foote  and  J.  R.  Coolson.  A catalog  of  the  Diptera  of  America  North  of 
Mexico.  U.  S.  Dep.  Agr.,  Washington,  D.C. 

Vaillant,  F.  1959.  The  larvae  of  three  nearctic  Diptera  of  the  family  Psychodidae.  New  York 
Entomol.  Soc.,  J.  67:39-50. 

Walker,  F.  1848.  List  of  the  specimens  of  dipterous  insects  in  the  collection  of  the  British 
Museum.  1:1-229. 


Accepted  for  publication  June  15,  1977. 


NUMBER  292 
MARCH  25,  1978 


scn>  7$ 

’ a lw& 


NEW  SPECIES  AND  RECORDS  OF  TROPICAL  WEST  AMERICAN 
MARGINELLIDAE  (MOLLUSCA:  NEOGASTROPODA) 


By  Barry  Roth 


NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 

CONTRIBUTDNS  IN  SCENC6 


Published  by  the  NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM 
OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007 

im 


SERIAL  PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE 
NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 


Prior  to  November  30,  1973,  publications  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  have  appeared 
under  various  formats — Leaflet  Series,  Museum  Graphic,  Science  Series,  Study  Guides,  Con- 
tributions in  Science,  Contributions  in  History,  Science  Bulletins,  unnumbered  catalogs  of 
exhibitions,  and  other  miscellaneous  publications.  The  Museum  now  publishes  the  following 
serials  at  irregular  intervals  as  CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE,  HISTORY  BULLETINS, 
SCIENCE  BULLETINS,  EDUCATION  SERIES,  HISTORY  SERIES,  and  SCIENCE  SE- 
RIES. The  Contributions  are  short  papers  of  octavo  size.  The  Bulletins  are  longer,  compre- 
hensive papers  of  quarto  size.  The  Series  are  papers  of  variable  lengths  of  quarto  or  larger 
size.  Papers  in  each  serial  are  numbered  separately  and  consecutively. 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  contain  articles  in  the  earth  and  life  sciences,  presenting 
results  of  original  research.  Emphasis  is  intended  principally  for  papers  allied  to  biosystematic 
research,  but  other  subjects  and  review-oriented  ones  will  be  considered.  Number  1 was  issued 
on  January  23,  1957.  Contributions  must  be  not  less  than  8 nor  exceed  72  printed  pages. 


INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  AUTHORS 

Acceptance  of  manuscripts  will  be  determined  by  the  significance  of  new  information.  Priority 
will  be  given  to  manuscripts  by  staff  members.  All  manuscripts  must  be  recommended  by  the 
curator  in  charge  of  each  discipline  or  by  the  Editorial  Board.  Manuscripts  must  conform  to 
the  specifications  listed  below.  They  will  be  examined  for  suitability  by  the  Editorial  Board 
and  will  include  review  by  specialists  outside  the  Museum. 

Authors  must  adhere  to  the  International  Code  of  Nomenclature  of  Bacteria  and  Viruses, 
International  Code  of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  and  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature, including  their  respective  recommendations.  Further,  authors  proposing  new  taxa  in 
a CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  must  indicate  that  all  primary  types  have  been  deposited 
in  an  appropriate  scientific  institution  of  their  choice  and  must  cite  that  institution  by  name. 

MANUSCRIPT  FORM. — (1)  In  preparation  of  copy  follow  the  1972  CBE  Style  Manual, 
third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapters  5 and  6.  (2)  Footnotes  should  be  avoided;  acknowledgments 
as  footnotes  will  not  be  accepted.  (3)  An  informative  abstract  must  be  included  for  all  papers. 
(4)  A Spanish  summary  is  required  for  all  manuscripts  dealing  with  Latin  American  subjects. 
Summaries  in  other  languages  are  not  required  but  are  strongly  recommended.  (5)  A differ- 
ential diagnosis  must  accompany  any  newly  proposed  taxon.  (6)  Submit  two  copies  of  manu- 
script. 

ILLUSTRATIONS. — All  illustrations,  including  maps  and  photographs,  will  be  referred  to 
as  figures.  All  illustrations  should  be  of  sufficient  clarity  and  in  proper  proportions  for  reduc- 
tion to  CONTRIBUTIONS  page  size.  In  preparing  illustrations  and  legends  consult  the  1972 
CBE  Style  Manual,  third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapter  5.  Submit  only  illustrations  made  with 
permanent  ink  and  glossy  photographic  prints  of  good  contrast.  Submit  duplicate  copies  of 
all  illustrations.  Original  illustrations  will  be  returned  after  the  manuscript  has  been  published. 

PROOF. — Authors  will  be  sent  galley  proofs  which  should  be  corrected  and  returned  promptly. 
No  changes  or  alterations,  other  than  typesetting  corrections,  will  be  allowed  unless  paid  by 
author.  Requests  for  reprints  may  be  placed  through  the  Editor. 

R.  Edward  Ostermeyer 
Editor 


All  communications  concerning  manuscripts  and  exchange  of  or  purchase  of  publications 
should  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Museum  Publications,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 

Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America  by  Chapman's  Phototypesetting  on  70#  Patina  Book 


NEW  SPECIES  AND  RECORDS  OF  TROPICAL  WEST  AMERICAN 
MARGINELLIDAE 
(MOLLUSCA:  NEOGASTROPODA)1 

By  Barry  Roth2 


Abstract:  Six  new  species  of  Marginellidae  are  described:  Prunum  ( Prunum ) 
gorgonense  from  off  Gorgona  Island,  Colombia;  Prunum  ( Prunum ) macleani  from 
Ecuador;  Prunum  ( Microspira ) aletes  and  Dentimargo  zetetes  from  localities  on  the 
Pacific  coast  of  Costa  Rica;  Dentimargo  epacrodonta  from  the  Republic  of  Panama; 
and  Volvarina  innexa  from  the  Galapagos  Islands.  Prunum  {Microspira)  aletes  is 
similar  to  several  Caribbean  species  and  Neogene  species  from  Florida.  Prunum 
{Prunum)  curtum  (Sowerby)  ranges  into  temperate  waters  south  of  the  Panamic  prov- 
ince; records  from  the  Gulf  of  Panama  need  confirmation.  The  radula  of  Prunum 
{Prunum)  woodbridgei  (Hertlein  and  Strong)  is  illustrated  and  compared  to  that  of 
Prunum  storerium  (Couthouy).  Dentimargo  anticlea  (Dali)  is  tentatively  recognized 
from  several  Galapagan  localities. 


INTRODUCTION 

Recent  accounts  of  the  members  of  the  Marginellidae  known  from  the  Panamic 
faunal  province  of  tropical  western  America  (Coan  and  Roth  in  Keen  1971;  Roth  and 
Coan  1971)  cite  20  named  species  and  subspecies.  The  extensive  molluscan  collec- 
tions of  the  Section  of  Malacology  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County  (LACM),  and  the  gastropod  collections  of  the  Allan  Hancock  Foundation, 
currently  on  loan  to  that  section,  have  furnished  material  for  the  description  of  the 
following  new  species  and  additional  information  concerning  species  previously 
described. 

I acknowledge  the  courtesy  of  James  H.  McLean,  Curator  of  Invertebrate  Zo- 
ology, LACM,  in  making  these  collections  available  for  study  and  aiding  in  the  prep- 
aration of  this  paper.  For  assistance  of  various  kinds  during  this  investigation  I am 
indebted  to  Emily  H.  Vokes,  Eugene  V.  Coan,  Antonio  J.  Ferreira,  and  Patrick 
LaFollette.  An  earlier  draft  of  part  of  the  manuscript  was  read  critically  by  J.  Wyatt 
Durham.  Joseph  Rosewater,  Thomas  R.  Waller,  and  Frederick  J.  Collier  lent  com- 
parative material  from  the  National  Museum  of  Natural  History.  Phillip  W.  Clover 
supplied  information  on  type  material  studied  by  him  in  European  museums. 


Review  Committee  for  this  Contribution 
William  K.  Emerson 
James  H.  McLean 
Joseph  Rosewater 

department  of  Geology,  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  San  Francisco,  California  94118. 


2 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  292 


FAMILY  MARGINELLIDAE  FLEMING 

GENUS  PRUNUM  HERRMANNSEN  1852 

Type  species,  by  monotypy  and  tautonymy,  Voluta  prunum  Gmelin  1791;  Recent,  Caribbean 

region. 

As  stated  by  Woodring  (1970),  Prunum  is  the  proper  generic  allocation  for  a 
large  number  of  fossil  and  Recent  species.  Prunum  in  the  broad  sense  includes  ovate 
to  elongate  shells  with  medium  to  low  spire,  aperture  narrow  or  wide  but  not  flaring 
anteriorly,  outer  lip  more  or  less  thickened  and  smooth  or  denticulate,  and  some  de- 
velopment of  callus  around  the  aperture. 

Subgenus  Prunum  sensu  stricto 

Outer  lip  not  greatly  thickened,  smooth  within;  anterior  canal  shallow;  callousing 
around  aperture  generally  limited  to  small  patch  on  parietal  wall;  color  pattern,  when 
present,  generally  of  indistinct  banding. 

Prunum  ( Prunum ) gorgonense  new  species 
Figure  1 

Diagnosis ; A small,  elongate  Prunum  differing  from  other  west  American  species 
in  the  relatively  high  spire,  narrow  body  whorl,  and  short  aperture,  colored  pale  pink- 
ish tan  with  interior  of  aperture  yellow. 

Description  of  holotype:  Shell  rather  small  for  the  genus,  elongate-ovate,  nar- 
rower anteriorly,  highly  polished,  solid.  Color  pale  pinkish  tan  with  two  very  faint, 
narrow,  darker  spiral  bands  dividing  the  body  whorl  into  thirds,  and  a narrow  zone 
of  apricot-orange  immediately  below  the  suture.  Apex  translucent,  apricot-orange; 
outer  lip  white;  interior  of  aperture  golden  yellow.  Spire  elevated,  apical  angle  about 
60°,  covered  by  a transparent  glaze,  which  leaves  sutures  visible  but  impalpable.  Outer 
lip  with  simple  convex  curvature,  sharply  varicose  externally,  not  denticulate.  Ap- 
erture narrow,  wider  anteriorly,  with  a short  posterior  notch;  anterior  margin  evenly 
rounded,  without  indentation.  Parietal  wall  moderately  convex,  not  calloused.  Col- 
umella very  slightly  concave,  with  four  oblique  folds  including  fold  at  base  of  col- 
umella, the  two  most  anterior  folds  close  together  and  fusing  distally  into  a low,  white 
fasciole  that  proceeds  around  anterior  end  of  shell  to  merge  with  outer  lip  callus. 
Length  16.2  mm,  width  8.0  mm. 

Type  locality:  AFH  221-34,  off  Gorgona  Island,  Colombia  (3°  OF  25"  N,  78° 
10'  W),  in  37  m on  rock  and  shell  bottom.  Collected  by  Allan  Hancock  Pacific  Ex- 
pedition of  1934,  12  February  1934.  One  specimen. 

Type  material.  Holotype,  LACM-AHF  1777. 

Referred  material:  One  immature  specimen,  AHF  228-34,  between  Gorgona  and 
Gorgonilla  Islands,  Colombia  (2°  56'  20"  N,  78°  14'  W),  mud  and  sand  bottom.  Col- 
lected by  Allan  Hancock  Pacific  Expedition  of  1934,  12  February  1934. 


1978 


West  American  Marginellidae 


3 


Discussion:  Prunum  ( Prunum ) gorgonense  is  smaller  and  much  paler  than 
Prunum  (. Prunum ) sapotilla  (Hinds  1844),  which  is  grayish  brown  with  a deep  brown 
aperture,  tinged  with  dull  orange  outside  the  outer  lip.  The  new  species  has  a pro- 
portionally higher  spire,  shorter  aperture,  and  less  inflated  body  whorl  than  P.  sa- 
potilla. The  latter  species  appears  to  be  confined  to  the  region  of  the  Gulf  of  Panama. 

In  shape  P.  gorgonense  is  closer  to  Prunum  {Prunum)  godini  Olsson  1964,  from 
the  Esmeraldas  Formation,  Neogene  of  Ecuador,  and  may  be  a descendant  of  that 
species  (Figs.  2,  3).  Prunum  godini  is  larger  (holotype  21.8  mm  long),  broader  at  the 
shoulder,  and  has  the  columella  markedly  excavated  anteriorly  so  that  the  two  most 
anterior  folds  diverge,  rather  than  converge  as  in  P.  gorgonense . The  fossil  species 
also  has  a raised  vertical  callus  rim  anteriorly,  visible  in  left  side  view  (Fig.  3),  which 
is  absent  in  P.  gorgonense. 

The  columellar  folds  of  P.  gorgonense  like  those  of  other  species  of  the  subgenus 
are  concave  in  profile,  with  the  hollow  surface  directed  posteriorly. 

Etymology:  gorgonense — from  Gorgona  Island,  the  type  locality. 

Prunum  {Prunum)  curtum  (Sowerby  1832) 

Figure  4 

Marginella  curta  Sowerby  1832:105;  Reeve  1864:  pi.  6,  figs.  23a,  23b. 

Marginella  {Prunum)  curta  Sowerby,  Coan  and  Roth  1966:280,  pi.  48,  figs.  4-6. 

Prunum  {Prunum)  curtum  (Sowerby),  Coan  and  Roth  in  Keen  1971:633,  fig.  1398. 

Although  it  was  described  from  Iquique,  Chile,  and  Paita,  Peru,  few  collections 


Figures  1-3.  1.  Prunum  {Prunum)  gorgonense  new  species,  holotype,  FACM-AHF 
1777,  length  16.2  mm.  2-3.  Prunum  {Prunum)  godini  Olsson,  holotype,  USNM 
643945,  length  21.8  mm. 


4 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  292 


of  this  species  have  been  made  south  of  the  Panamic  province.  Fresh  beach  shells 
were  found  in  some  numbers  on  an  intertidal  sandbar  at  Laguna  Grande,  lea  Province, 
Peru  (14°  08'  S,  76°  15'  W)  by  J.  H.  McLean  and  Victor  Alamo,  31  March  1972. 
One  specimen  from  that  locality  (LACM  72-77)  is  illustrated.  An  analogous  situation 
in  the  Atlantic  Ocean  is  the  presence  of  Prunum  species  in  temperate  waters  of  Ar- 
gentina (Carcelles  1944). 

No  verified  type  rpaterial  of  this  species  is  known  to  exist  (Coan  and  Roth  1966). 
The  specimens  from  Laguna  Grande  agree  with  the  original  diagnosis  and  with 
Reeve’s  (1864)  figure  of  a specimen  from  the  Cuming  collection.  For  purposes  of 
comparison  with  Prunum  {Prunum)  macleani,  I have  considered  the  Laguna  Grande 
material  to  represent  typical  P . curtum. 

Coan  and  Roth  in  Keen  (1971)  cite  this  species  as  ranging  north  to  Manta,  Ec- 
uador. Lots  at  LACM  from  the  Gulf  of  Panama  differ  in  several  details  from  South 
American  specimens  and  may  represent  other,  unrecognized,  species. 

Prunum  ( Prunum ) macleani  new  species 
Figures  5-8 

Diagnosis:  A large  Prunum  with  relatively  low  spire,  differing  from  other  west 
American  species  in  the  elongate-conic  body  whorl,  wide  aperture,  and  coloration: 
muted  rose  with  white  flecking  in  spiral  bands,  apertural  callus  edged  with  bright 
orange. 

Description  ofholotype:  Shell  large  for  the  genus,  inflated,  ovate-conic,  narrower 
anteriorly,  highly  polished,  solid.  Color  muted  rose  to  rosy  tan  with  a lighter,  poorly 
defined,  flesh  color  subsutural  band  and  fine  white  flecking  tending  toward  arrange- 
ment in  spiral  bands,  most  evident  around  middle  of  body  whorl  and  near  anterior 
end.  Apex  translucent,  rosy  brown;  spire  low,  apical  angle  about  80°,  light  flesh  color, 
covered  by  a transparent  glaze  which  renders  suture  indistinct.  Aperture  moderately 
wide,  wider  anteriorly,  rose  color  within,  anterior  margin  somewhat  effuse.  Outer  lip 
varicose,  white  on  ventral  surface,  margined  with  brilliant  orange  externally,  not  den- 
ticulate. Parietal  wall  moderately  convex  with  a patch  of  translucent,  whitish  callus. 
Columella  concave,  with  four  oblique,  moderately  diverging  folds,  including  fold  at 
base  of  columella;  the  two  most  anterior  folds  most  oblique,  nearly  parallel,  and  closer 
together  than  posterior  two  folds,  merging  distally  into  a low,  white  fasciole  with  a 
bright  orange  external  margin  that  proceeds  around  anterior  end  of  shell  to  merge  with 
outer  lip  callus.  Length  36.6  mm,  width  21.2  mm. 

Type  locality:  Station  778,  Anton  Bruun  Cruise  18B  (LACM  66-198),  west  of 
Cabo  Pasado,  Ecuador  (0°  21'  S,  80°  41'  W),  in  19  m,  collected  12  September  1966. 
Twelve  specimens. 

Type  material:  Holotype,  USNM  749065.  One  paratype,  USNM  749066.  Nine 
paratypes  (shells)  and  one  paratype  radula  slide,  LACM  1778.  One  paratype,  Cali- 
fornia Academy  of  Sciences,  Geology  Type  Collection  55607.  The  paratypes  differ 
slightly  from  the  holotype  in  height  of  spire,  posterior  extent  of  outer  lip,  degree  of 
development  of  parietal  callus,  and  depth  of  ground  color.  In  the  lowest- spired  ex- 


1978 


West  American  Marginellidae 


5 


Figures  4-7.  4.  Prunum  ( Prunum ) curtum  (Sowerby),  hypotype,  CASG  54324,  La- 
guna Grande,  lea  Province,  Peru,  length  17.8  mm.  5-6.  Prunum  ( Prunum ) macleani 
new  species,  holotype,  USNM  749065,  length  36.6  mm.  7.  Prunum  {Prunum)  ma- 
cleani new  species,  hypotype,  AHF  213-34,  off  La  Plata  Island.  Ecuador,  length  22.7 
mm. 


6 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  292 


ample,  the  apical  angle  is  about  130°  and  the  outer  lip  extends  nearly  as  far  backward 
as  the  tip  of  the  spire. 

Referred  material:  Thirteen  specimens,  AHF  213-34,  off  La  Plata  Island,  Ec- 
uador (1°  15'  25"  S,  81°  05'  15"  W),  13-18  m on  rock  bottom.  Collected  by  Allan 
Hancock  Pacific  Expedition  of  1934,  10  February  1934.  Three  specimens,  AHF  212- 
34,  off  La  Plata  Island,  Ecuador  (1°  15'  S,  81°  04'  15"  W),  82-100  m on  rock  and 
mud.  Collected  by  Allan  Hancock  Pacific  Expedition  of  1934,  10  February  1934. 
These  specimens  range  from  15.4  to  23  mm  in  length  and  are  more  strongly  calloused 
on  the  face  of  the  body  whorl  (Fig.  7). 

Discussion:  This  handsome  species  is  the  largest  marginellid  known  from  the 
eastern  Pacific  region  and,  in  the  form  represented  by  the  type  lot,  could  not  be  con- 
fused with  any  other  species.  The  referred  material  from  off  La  Plata  Island,  however, 
is  much  smaller  and  superficially  resembles  Prunum  ( Prunum ) curtum.  These  spec- 
imens are  distinguished  from  P.  curtum  by  their  roseate  color,  more  elongate-conic 
body  whorl,  and  effuse  anterior  end  of  the  aperture.  Prunum  curtum  is  usually  grayish 
yellow  or  grayish  brown  with  a variable  amount  of  lighter  flecking.  Its  body  whorl 
is  shorter  and  broader  than  that  of  P.  macleani,  with  a characteristic  gibbous  angu- 
lation of  the  upper  part.  Its  anterior  end  appears  truncated  in  ventral  view.  The  exterior 
of  its  outer  lip  callus  is  brownish  orange,  and  this  same  color  appears,  often  quite 
extensively,  around  the  edge  of  the  parietal  callus  (Fig.  4).  The  interior  of  the  aperture 
is  commonly  brown. 

The  radula  of  Prunum  {Prunum)  macleani  (Fig.  8)  consists  of  broad,  nearly 
straight,  comblike  rachidian  teeth  on  which  large  and  small  cusps  alternate.  Each  tooth 
of  the  figured  specimen  bears  29  cusps. 

Etymology:  The  species  is  named  for  Dr.  James  H.  McLean. 

Prunum  {Prunum)  woodbridgei  (Hertlein  and  Strong  1951) 

Figure  9 

Marginella  woodbridgei  Hertlein  and  Strong  1951:80,  pi.  26,  figs.  3,  4. 

Prunum  {Prunum)  woodbridgei  (Hertlein  and  Strong),  Coan  and  Roth  in  Keen  1971:633,  fig. 

1400. 

Figure  9 illustrates  the  radula  of  a specimen  from  AHF  930-39,  off  San  Jose 
Light,  Guatemala  (13°  52'  35"  N,  91°  01'  02"  W),  22-24  m on  fine  black  sand,  col- 
lected 23  March  1939.  The  radula  consists  of  a single  row  of  approximately  35  broad, 
straight,  comblike  rachidian  teeth  on  which  large  cusps  alternate  with  from  1-4  smaller 
cusps.  A total  of  24  cusps  are  present  on  each  tooth  of  the  figured  specimen. 

The  radula  is  closely  similar  to  that  of  Prunum  storerium  (Couthouy  1837)  (Figs. 
10,  1 1),  a Caribbean  species.  The  shell  characters  noted  by  Hertlein  and  Strong  (1951) 
also  suggest  close  relationship  between  the  two  species.  The  radula  of  Prunum  api- 
cinum  (Menke  1828),  suggested  by  Coan  and  Roth  (1966)  as  another  allied  species, 
is  less  similar.  Prunum  storerium  frequently  is  placed  in  the  subgenus  Microspira 
Conrad  1868,  based  on  the  extensive  callousing  around  the  aperture  and  on  the  face 
of  the  body  whorl  {cf.  Woodring  1970:331-332);  but  this  character  evidently  cuts 


1978 


West  American  Marginellidae 


7 


Figures  8-9.  8.  Prunum  ( Prunum ) macleani  new  species,  radula  of  paratype,  LACM 
1778.  9.  Prunum  {Prunum)  woodbridgei  (Hertlein  and  Strong),  radula,  AHF  930-39, 
off  San  Jose  Light,  Guatemala. 


Figures  10-11.  Radulae  of  Prunum  storerium  (Couthouy),  Margarita  Island,  Venezuela. 


across  phyletic  lines  based  upon  radular  features,  which  are  assumed  to  be  more 
conservative. 


Subgenus  Microspira  Conrad  1868 

Type  species,  by  monotypy,  Volutella  (Microspira)  oviformis  Conrad  1868;  Miocene,  Virginia. 

Outer  lip  thick,  smooth  to  finely  denticulate  within;  anterior  canal  shallow;  spire  low, 
sometimes  depressed  but  not  fully  involuted,  covered  with  a wash  of  callus;  callousing 
generally  extensive  around  aperture  and  on  face  of  body  whorl;  color  pattern,  when 
present,  of  banding  and/or  irregular  spotting. 


8 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  292 


Pending  further  studies,  Egouena  Jousseaume  1875  (type  species,  Egouena 
egouen  Jousseaume  = Marginella  amygdala  Kiener;  Recent,  west  Africa),  and  J.ep- 
tegouana  Woodring  1929  (type  species,  Voluta  guttata  Dillwyn;  Recent,  West  Indies), 
are  here  tentatively  considered  synonyms  of  Microspira,  an  interpretation  suggested 
by  Woodring  (1970).  The  chief  characters  on  which  supraspecific  taxa  in  the  Prunum 
group  are  traditionally  recognized  pertain  to  development  of  callus  on  body  whorl  and 
spire  and  the  degree  of  thickening  of  the  outer  lip — characters  having  limited  phyletic 
significance,  as  discussed  above  under  Prunum  C Prunum ) woodbridgei . With  the  ex- 
clusion of  the  generally  less  calloused  species  of  Prunum,  (sensu  stricto),  Micros- 
pira, as  broadly  construed,  contains  the  majority  of  recent  and  fossil  species  of  the 
genus. 


Prunum  (Microspira)  aletes  new  species 
Figures  12-13 

Marginella  ( Prunum ) species,  Coan  and  Roth  1966:280,  pi.  48,  figs.  7,  8. 

Prunum  ( Microspira ) species  Coan  and  Roth,  Woodring  1970:332. 

Diagnosis:  A pyriform  marginellid  distinguished  from  other  west  American  spe- 
cies of  Prunum  by  its  ground  color  of  orange-brown  with  indistinct  darker  brown 


Figures  12-13.  Prunum  ( Microspira ) aletes  new  species,  holotype,  LACM  1779, 
length  15.2  mm. 


1978 


West  American  Marginellidae 


9 


spiral  bands  and  an  overall  pattern  of  irregular  white  flecks,  narrow,  sinuous  aperture, 
denticulate  outer  lip,  and  calloused  parietal  wall. 

Description  ofholotype:  Shell  of  medium  size  for  the  subgenus,  solid,  pyriform, 
inflated  at  shoulder,  narrower  anteriorly,  with  a shallow  constriction  across  body 
whorl  slightly  anterior  to  middle.  Entire  shell  somewhat  dorsoventrally  flattened.  Sur- 
face highly  polished,  unsculptured.  Color  pale  orange-brown  with  three  darker,  rather 
indistinct,  purplish  brown  spiral  bands,  the  first  immediately  below  the  suture,  the 
second  at  the  middle  of  the  body  whorl,  and  the  third  at  the  anterior  one-fourth  of 
body  whorl.  Shell  completely  overlain  by  a layer  of  clear  enamel,  rendering  suture 
indistinct  and,  on  the  body  whorl,  bearing  numerous  white  flecks  of  irregular  shape, 
which  tend  to  fall  into  ranks  parallel  to  outer  lip  and  into  series  oblique  to  axis  of 
shell.  Spire  low,  light  apricot-orange;  extreme  apex  white.  Outer  lip  white,  sharply 
varicose  externally  and  bearing  two  brown  spots  aligned  with  the  two  lower  color 
bands  on  body  whorl;  slightly  constricted  medially;  finely  denticulate  along  most  of 
its  length.  Aperture  narrow,  even,  shallowly  S-curved,  banded  brown  and  apricot- 
orange  inside;  terminating  posteriorly  in  a deep,  straight  sulcus.  Parietal  wall  concave 
anteriorly,  convex  posteriorly,  covered  with  translucent  white  callus  that  thickens  to 
rim  the  posterior  sulcus  and  continues  up  apertural  side  of  spire  nearly  to  apex.  Center 
of  parietal  callus  thickened  into  an  acute,  axially  elongate  node.  Columella  with  four 
nearly  equal,  diverging  folds,  including  one  at  base  of  columella,  the  two  lowest  folds 
terminating  anteriorly  in  a weakly  developed,  white  fasciole  that  is  continuous  with 
the  varicose  outer  lip  around  anterior  end  of  shell.  Length  15.2  mm,  width  10.0  mm. 

Type  locality:  LACM  locality  72-21,  3-11  m in  cove  between  Isla  San  Jose  and 
Isla  Cocinero,  Islas  Murcielagos,  Guanacaste  Province,  Costa  Rica  (10°  51'  50"  N, 
86°  55'  30"  W),  collected  by  P.  LaFollette,  D.  Cadien,  A.  J.  Ferreira,  17  February 
1972  (R/V  Searcher  station  404-405).  Four  specimens. 

Type  material : Holotype,  LACM  1779.  Two  paratypes,  LACM  1780.  One  par- 
atype,  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  Geology  Type  Collection,  55608.  The  par- 
atypes differ  very  slightly  from  the  holotype  in  development  of  the  white  spotting  on 
the  body  whorl  and  in  extent  of  the  parietal  callus.  Two  are  of  paler  ground  color 
than  the  holotype,  with  light  orange,  rather  than  brown,  transverse  bands.  The  par- 
atypes range  from  13.7  to  16  mm  in  length. 

Referred  material:  The  species  was  taken  by  the  R/V  Searcher  at  eight  other 
stations  off  Costa  Rica:  392,  LACM  72-12,  1.6  km  offshore  between  Bahia  Elena 
and  Juanillo  Bay,  Guanacaste  Province  (10°  57'  20"  N,  85°  46'  08"  W),  in  53.0-26 
m,  14  February  1972,  1 immature  specimen;  403,  LACM  72-20,  cove  on  west  side 
of  Isla  Cocinero,  Islas  Murcielagos,  Guanacaste  Province  (10°  51'  27"  N,  86°  55'  15" 
W),  in  12-18  m,  16  February  1972,  one  specimen;  409,  LACM  72-24,  anchorage  in 
cove,  northeast  side  of  Isla  San  Pedrita,  Islas  Murcielagos,  Guanacaste  Province  (10° 
51'  40"  N,  86°  57'  54"  W),  in  18-24  m,  17  February  1972,  two  specimens;  415, 
LACM  72-30,  south  tip  of  Punta  Santa  Elena,  Guanacaste  Province  (10°  53'  35"  N, 
85°  57'  52"  W),  in  12-15  m,  18  February  1972,  four  specimens;  423,  LACM  72-37, 
between  the  two  Vivadores  Norte  Islands,  near  Bahia  Culebra,  Guanacaste  Province 
(10°  36'  42"  N,  85°  43'  00"  W),  in  18-21  m,  19  February  1972,  two  specimens;  428, 


10 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  292 


LACM  72-40,  1.6  km  off  beach,  Bahia  Brasilito,  Guanacaste  Province  (10°  25'  57" 
N,  85°  49'  18"  W),  in  18  m,  20  February  1972,  three  specimens;  431-432,  LACM 
72-42,  2.4  km  east  of  Punta  Ballena,  Bahia  Ballena,  Puntarenas  (9°  44'  15"  N,  84° 
33'  45"  W),  in  3-15  m,  21  and  22  February  1972,  one  specimen;  480-481,  LACM 

72- 67,  off  Isla  del  Cano,  NW  side,  Puntarenas  Province  (8°  45'  N,  84°  00'  W),  in 

73- 82  m,  16  March  1972,  one  specimen. 

One  specimen,  AHF  245-34,  off  Pacora  Island,  off  Bahia  Honda,  Panama  (7° 
44'  19"  N,  81°  35'  23"  W),  27-46  m on  rock  and  shell  bottom,  collected  21  February 
1934. 

Two  specimens,  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  Geology  Type  Collection 
12749,  12750,  from  CAS  locality  27557,  dredged  off  Puntarenas,  Costa  Rica,  by  the 
Templeton  Crocker  Expedition,  1 July  1932.  These  two  worn  specimens  are  the  ones 
described  by  Coan  and  Roth  (1966:280,  pi.  48,  figs.  7,  8)  as  “ Marginella  {Prunum) 
sp.” 

Discussion:  Placement  of  this  species  in  the  subgenus  Microspira  was  first  sug- 
gested by  Woodring  (1970),  citing  the  Coan  and  Roth  (1966)  illustrations.  This  is  the 
first  verified  record  of  the  subgenus  in  west  American  waters.  {Marginella  albuminosa 
Dali  1919,  probably  a Microspira,  is  now  thought  to  have  been  reported  from  west 
Mexico  in  error;  cf.  Keen  1971:907.) 

The  color  pattern  of  Prunum  {Microspira)  aletes  distinguishes  it  from  all  other 
known  eastern  Pacific  Marginellidae.  Its  pyriform  shape,  narrow,  S-curved  aperture, 
and  dorsoventral  flattening  of  the  shall  are  other  diagnostic  characters.  Prunum  sa- 
potilla  (Hinds),  which  may  be  sympatric  withP.  aletes  in  the  region  of  Bahia  Honda, 
Panama,  sometimes  has  faint  spiral  bands,  but  it  is  much  more  elongate  and  lacks  any 
trace  of  white  spotting.  Coan  and  Roth  (1966:  table  2)  contrasted  the  new  species  to 
Prunum  curtum  (Sowerby)  on  several  features,  including  the  narrow  aperture,  the 
thick,  finely  toothed  outer  lip,  and  the  outline  of  the  shell.  Prunum  woodbridgei 
(Hertlein  and  Strong)  is  brownish  gray,  not  spotted,  and  has  an  open,  simply  curved 
aperture. 

The  dark  spiral  bands  of  P . aletes  are  at  least  partially  antecedent  to  the  clear 
enamel  with  white  spots  that  lies  over  them.  An  immature  specimen  (LACM  72-12) 
is  plainly  banded  and  has  much  sparser  spotting  than  any  of  the  adult  specimens. 
Young  specimens  of  the  Caribbean  Prunum  storerium  (Couthouy)  are  conspicuously 
banded  with  purple  on  a straw-colored  ground,  this  pattern  later  being  obscured  by 
the  predominantly  gray  enamel  of  mature  shells. 

Like  many  other  tropical  west  American  marginellids,  Prunum  {Microspira)  al- 
etes is  most  similar  to  species  now  living  in  the  Caribbean  region.  The  actual  number 
of  western  Atlantic  species  remains  to  be  determined.  Probably  closest  to  P.  aletes 
is  the  species  from  Grand  Cayman  Island,  British  West  Indies,  figured  by  Abbott 
(1958:84,  pi.  2,  figs,  j,  k)  as  “ Prunum  pruniosum  Hinds”  (error  for  Marginella  prui- 
nosa  Hinds  1844)  with  Marginella  nivea  C.  B.  Adams  1850,  placed  in  synonymy. 
Abbott  (1958:84)  described  the  species  thus:  “Shell  8 to  12  mm.  in  length,  resembling 
guttatum,  but  with  its  white  spots  half  as  small;  with  numerous,  weak,  uneven,  den- 
ticulations  on  the  inner  [outer?]  lip;  with  3 weak,  diffused  spiral  bands  of  yellowish 
brown  (or  absent);  without  color  spots  on  the  outer  lip,  and  with  a slightly  raised  spire 


1978 


West  American  Marginellidae 


11 


which  is  never  covered  by  the  labral  callus.”  Some  color  variation  among  Grand 
Cayman  populations  was  also  specified.  The  narrow  aperture  is  doubly  curved,  as  in 
P.  aletes. 

Tryon  (1882)  united  Marginella  pruinosa  and  Mar ginella  nivosa  Hinds  1844, 
under  the  latter  name;  this  synonymy  was  disputed  by  Abbott  (1958).  Marginella 
nivea  C.  B.  Adams  1850,  described  from  Jamaica,  is  also  similar.  The  lectotype, 
figured  by  Clench  and  Turner  (1950),  is  a worn,  whitish  shell  9 mm  long,  of  the  same 
general  shape  as  Abbott’s  Grand  Cayman  species,  with  columellar  folds  more  nearly 
parallel.  Tryon  (1882)  cited M.  nivea  as  another  synonym  of M.  nivosa.  Examination 
of  large  suites  of  Caribbean  material  may  be  necessary  to  settle  the  question  of  syn- 
onymy. Some  workers  consider  the  presence  or  absence  of  dark  spots  on  the  outer 
lip  to  be  taxonomically  significant. 

Prunum  ( Microspira ) guttatum  (Dillwyn  1817)  from  Florida,  the  West  Indies, 
and  Panama,  is  another  white-flecked  species.  It  is  larger  than  P . aletes,  frequently 
reaching  20  mm  or  more  in  length,  and  more  regularly  ovate  than  the  Pacific  species. 
Its  apertural  callus  may  extend  as  far  as,  or  even  posterior  to,  the  tip  of  its  low  spire. 
The  outer  lip  is  slightly  constricted  medially  and  bears  a variable  number  of  orange- 
brown  blotches.  The  labral  denticulation  is  very  weak  in  all  specimens  examined.  In 
form  and  color,  P.  guttatum  is  quite  variable;  notes  on  one  variation  were  given  by 
Bayer  (1943). 

The  somewhat  similar  Prunum  {Microspira)  roscidum  (Redfield  1860),  living 
from  New  Jersey  to  eastern  Florida,  was  contrasted  to  P.  guttatum  by  Abbott  (1957). 
In  the  synonymy  ofP.  roscidum,  Abbott  included  Marginella  eulima  Dali  1892,  late 
Neogene  of  Shell  Creek  and  Caloosahatchie  beds,  Florida,  which  was  described  as 
having  opaque  white  flakes  on  translucent  enamel  and  was  itself  a renaming  of  spotted 
specimens  previously  (Dali  1890)  referred  to  Marginella  limatula  Conrad  1834.  Dali 
(1892)  suggested  that  M.  eulima  might  be  ancestral  to  M.  nivosa.  Spotted  patterns, 
sometimes  detectable  under  ultraviolet  light,  characterize  a number  of  other  small  to 
medium-sized  species  from  the  Neogene  of  Florida. 

Prunum  {Microspira)  donovani  (Olsson  1967)  of  the  Pinecrest  beds,  middle  Pli- 
ocene of  southern  Florida  (Akers  1974),  more  than  twice  the  size  of  P.  aletes  and 
having  five  instead  of  four  columellar  folds,  appears  to  be  another  relative.  Under 
ultraviolet  light  it  shows  a pattern  of  spots  in  the  superficial  enamel  and,  beneath, 
transverse  banding  (Olsson  1967:  pi.  8,  figs.  9a-9c). 

Throughout  the  later  Tertiary,  Microspira  constitutes  a prolific  group  in  the 
American  tropics.  Discrimination  of  probable  lineages  is  difficult.  It  seems  certain, 
however,  that  several  stocks  of  white-spotted  species  existed  in  the  area  prior  to  the 
closing  of  the  Central  American  isthmus.  On  the  west,  one  such  stock  has  survived 
to  the  present  day,  represented  by  P.  aletes. 

Etymology:  aletes — Gr.,  a wanderer. 

GENUS  DENTIMARGO  COSSMANN  1899 

Type  species,  by  original  designation,  Marginella  dentifera  Lamarck  1803;  Eocene,  western 

Europe. 


12 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  292 


Small  to  minute,  biconic,  high-spired;  anterior  notch  absent;  outer  lip  smooth  or 
denticulate  within,  commonly  with  a large  posterior  denticle. 

Eburnospira  Olsson  & Harbison  1953  (type  species,  Marginella  eburneola  Con- 
rad), Longinella  Laseron  1957,  non  Gros  and  Lestage  1927  (type  species,  Marginella 
maugeana  Hedley),  and  Volvarinella  Habe  1951  (type  species,  V.  makiyamai  Habe), 
are  regarded  as  synonyms  of  Dentimargo . 

Dentimargo  anticlea  (Dali  1919) 


Marginella  anticlea  Dali  1919:307.  Coan  and  Roth  1966:289,  pi.  51,  fig.  61  (in  synonymy  of 

Volvarinella  eremus  [Dali]). 

Coan  and  Roth  (1966)  synonymized  this  species  with  Marginella  eremus  Dali 
1919,  considering  the  type  lot  ofM.  anticlea  to  represent  immature  specimens  of  M. 
eremus.  The  lectotype  of  anticlea  is  smaller,  less  sharply  biconic,  and  lacks  the  prom- 
inent labral  denticle  of  M.  eremus.  Its  nucleus  is  moderately  large  and  blunt,  and 
projects  little  from  the  succeeding  whorls.  The  LACM-AHF  collections  contain  ma- 
terial from  the  Galapagos  Islands,  from  depths  of  approximately  80  to  110  meters, 
which  seems  at  least  tentatively  referable  to  Dentimargo  anticlea.  Since  these  spec- 
imens show  evidence  of  maturity — e.g.,  slight  thickening  and  intuming  of  the  outer 
lip  and  development  of  a low  posterior  denticle  a short  distance  inside  the  aperture 
— at  lengths  of  2.7  to  3.5  mm,  they  call  into  question  the  premise  that  Dali’s  two 
nominal  taxa  represent  growth  stages  of  the  same  species. 

These  specimens  share  with  the  lectotype  of  M.  anticlea  a low,  blunt  nuclear 
shorl,  a columella  excavated  so  that  the  most  posterior  fold  projects  farthest  into  the 
aperture,  and  an  acute  posterior  angle  of  the  aperture. 

Referred  material : Two  specimens,  bottom  sample  AHF  406,  Hancock  Bank, 
northeast  of  Charles  Island,  Galapagos  Islands,  Ecuador  (01°  03'  30"  S,  90°  17'  30" 
W),  110  m.  Collected  by  Allan  Hancock  Pacific  Expedition  of  1933,  5 February  1933. 
Five  specimens,  bottom  sample  AHF  415,  north  of  Indefatigable  Island,  Galapagos 
Islands  (0°  27'  S,  90°  22'  W),  100  m.  Collected  by  Allan  Hancock  Pacific  Expedition 
of  1933,  17  February  1933.  One  immature  specimen,  bottom  sample  AHF  411,  north 
of  Duncan  Island,  Galapagos  Islands  (approx.  0°  35'  S,  90°  40'  W),  82  m.  Collected 
by  Allan  Hancock  Pacific  Expedition  of  1933,  15  February  1933.  Seven  specimens 
(four  juvenile),  bottom  sample  AHF  417,  north  of  Indefatigable  Island,  Galapagos 
Islands  (0°  27'  S,  90°  22'  W),  100  m.  Collected  by  Allan  Hancock  Pacific  Expedition 
of  1933,  17  February  1933. 

A lot  of  three  specimens,  bottom  sample  AHF  400,  Gardner  Bay,  Hood  Island, 
Galapagos  Islands  (approx.  01°  22'  S,  89°  39'  W),  31  m,  collected  by  Allan  Hancock 
Pacific  Expedition  of  1933,  25  January  1933,  is  distinctive  in  having  a medium-sized, 
moderately  elevated  nucleus,  higher  and  more  conic  spire,  aperture  58%  of  total  length 
of  shell  (compared  to  an  average  of  66%  for  specimens  from  bottom  sample  AHF 
415),  and  slightly  more  shouldered  body  whorl,  resulting  in  a more  obtuse  posterior 
angle  of  aperture.  The  largest  specimen  is  3.7  mm  long.  One  additional,  worn  indi- 
vidual from  bottom  sample  AHF  407,  Albemarle  Point,  Albemarle  Island,  Galapagos 


1978 


West  American  Marginellidae 


13 


Islands  (approx.  0°  12'  N,  91°  21'  W),  91  m,  collected  by  Allan  Hancock  Pacific 
Expedition  of  1933,  10  February  1933,  is  intermediate  in  spire  height  and  projection 
of  the  nucleus.  I believe  the  Hood  Island  specimens  to  be  extreme  members  in  a 
varying  series  of  shallow  water  populations  of  Dentimargo  anticlea. 

Coan  and  Roth  (1966:  pi.  51,  figs.  62,  63)  illustrated  as  a hypotype  of  “Lo/- 
varinella  ’ eremus  (Dali)  a high-spired  shell  with  orange-brown  bands  around  the  body 
whorl;  the  same  figure  was  reprinted  by  Keen  (1971:  fig.  1401).  The  figured  speci- 
men, from  the  Stanford  University  collection  (SUPTC  9847),  was  labeled  Albemarle 
Island,  Galapagos  Islands.  It  is  extremely  similar  to  specimens  of  Dentimargo  au- 
reocincta  (Stearns  1873)  from  Cedar  Key,  Florida  (Locality  852,  California  Academy 
of  Sciences  Department  of  Geology),  particularly  in  size,  disposition  of  the  color 
bands,  prominence  of  columellar  folds,  and  arrangement  of  teeth  along  the  convex 
and  thickened  outer  lip.  They  also  share  a marked  diagonal  truncation  of  the  outer  lip 
anteriorly.  Unless  further  collecting  in  the  Galapagos  turns  up  material  to  confirm  the 
record,  it  appears  probable  that  the  Stanford  specimen  is  a misallocated  Atlantic  shell. 
The  only  Dentimargo  species  in  tropical  west  America  definitely  known  to  have  brown 
banding  is  D.  zetetes,  described  below. 

Dentimargo  zetetes  new  species 
Figure  14 

Diagnosis:  A small,  gracefully  fusiform  Dentimargo  with  whorls  of  spire  only 
slightly  convex,  sutures  scarcely  impressed;  distinguished  from  other  west  American 
species  by  the  presence  of  orange-brown  spiral  banding  which  is  composite  in  size 
and  strength  of  the  bands. 

Description  of  holotype:  Shell  rather  small  for  the  genus,  gracefully  fusiform, 
somewhat  inflated  anteriorly.  Surface  highly  polished,  unsculptured.  Translucent 
white,  with  four  narrow,  sharply  defined,  orange  brown  spiral  bands  on  body  whorl, 
the  first  band  paler  than  the  rest,  just  anterior  to  suture,  the  remaining  three  dividing 
the  body  whorl  approximately  into  fourths;  regions  between  second  and  third,  and 
third  and  fourth  bands  lightly  colored  orange-brown,  with  faint  indications  of  sec- 
ondary banding;  with  a poorly  defined  orange-brown  zone  extending  from  anterior 
end  of  shell  to  just  anterior  of  last  narrow  band.  Nucleus  small,  rounded,  moderately 
projecting.  Spire  high,  of  three  whorls,  flat-sided;  suture  indistinct,  scarcely  im- 
pressed; two  posterior  color  bands  showing  on  whorls  of  spire.  Outer  lip  thick,  con- 
vex, white  with  color  bands  continuing  to  its  edge,  with  moderately  broad,  sloping 
shoulder  behind  aperture;  interior  with  one  major  denticle  posteriorly  and  three 
smaller,  low,  obscure  denticles  medially.  Aperture  moderately  wide,  whitish  inside 
with  color  bands  showing  through,  anterior  margin  slightly  produced,  posterior  angle 
obtuse,  posterior  notch  distinct.  Parietal  wall  faintly  convex,  uncalloused.  Columella 
shallowly  concave,  with  four  diverging,  nearly  equidistant  folds  including  fold  at  base 
of  columella;  posterior  three  folds  subequal  in  size,  basal  one  smaller.  Length  4. 1 
mm,  width  2.0  mm,  length  of  aperture  2.2  mm. 

Type  locality:  LACM  locality  72-7 , 1-11  m,  Punta  Isla  to  500  m south  of  point, 


14 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  292 


Bahia  Elena,  Guanacaste  Province,  Costa  Rica  (10°  56'  00"  N,  85°  48'  55"  W),  col- 
lected by  P.  LaFollette  & D.  Cadien,  13  February,  1972  (R/V  Searcher  station  382- 
383).  Two  specimens. 

Type  material:  Holotype,  FACM  1781.  Paratype,  FACM  1782. 

Referred  material:  Two  specimens,  AHF  472-35,  Port  Parker,  Costa  Rica  (10° 
57'  50"  N,  85°  48'  45"  W),  55  m on  shell  bottom.  Collected  by  Allan  Hancock  Pacific 
Expedition  of  1935,  9 February  1935.  One  specimen,  AHF  470-35,  Port  Parker,  Costa 
Rica  (10°  57'  35"  N,  85°  49'  W),  9 m on  sand  and  mud  bottom.  Collected  by  Allan 
Hancock  Pacific  Expedition  of  1935,  9 February  1935.  One  specimen,  bottom  sample 
AHF  316,  Gulfo  Elena  (Port  Parker),  Costa  Rica  (approx.  10°  55'  N,  85°  49'  W),  26 
m.  Collected  by  Allan  Hancock  Pacific  Expedition  of  1935,  8 February  1935.  One 
specimen,  LACM  70-65,  Playas  del  Coco,  Costa  Rica  (10°  33'  N,  85°  43'  W),  in- 
tertidal. Collected  by  T.  M.  Spight,  February-March  1970.  Two  specimens,  FACM 
72-30,  south  tip  of  Punta  Santa  Elena,  Guanacaste  Province,  Costa  Rica  (10°  53'  35" 
N,  85°  57'  52"  W),  in  12-15  m,  collected  by  P.  FaFollette  and  D.  Cadien,  18  February 
1972  (R/V  Searcher  sta.  415).  Ninety-five  specimens,  FACM  72-12,  1 .6  km  offshore 
between  Bahia  Elena  and  Juanillo  Bay,  Guanacaste  Province,  Costa  Rica  (10°  57'  20" 
N,  85°  46'  08"  W),  in  53-26  m,  collected  by  P.  FaFollette  and  D.  Cadien,  14  February 
1972  (R/V  Searcher  sta.  392). 

Discussion:  The  paratype  is  banded  similarly  to  the  holotype,  and  the  large  lot 
from  FACM  locality  72-12  shows  minor  variations  of  the  same  pattern.  The  banding 
on  a specimen  from  AHF  472-35  differs  in  having  (starting  below  the  suture)  a very 
faint  narrow  band,  followed  by  a distinct  narrow  band  on  the  posterior  third  of  the 
whorl,  a broad  band  near  the  middle  of  the  aperture,  another  narrow  band,  and  a 
brown  zone  at  the  anterior  end  of  the  shell.  Other  specimens  show  banding  faintly 
but  are  too  worn  to  permit  a detailed  description  of  the  pattern.  The  complex  nature 
of  the  banding,  in  both  size  and  strength,  nevertheless  appears  to  be  a diagnostic 
character  and  helps  to  distinguish  D.  zetetes  from  the  Caribbean  Dentimargo  aureo- 
cincta  (Steams  1873),  which  also  differs  in  having  a shorter  aperture  and  denticles 
borne  on  the  edge  of  the  outer  lip  rather  than  a short  distance  inside  the  aperture. 

Dentimargo  zetetes  appears  to  be  the  only  eastern  Pacific  species  with  a color 
pattern,  as  mentioned  above  under  D.  anticlea.  The  latter  species  has,  in  most  in- 
stances, a larger,  flatter  nucleus  and  more  convex  whorls  of  the  spire.  Dentimargo 
erema  (Dali  1919)  is  unbanded,  has  denticles  on  the  edge  of  the  outer  lip,  and  a larger, 
bulbous  nucleus.  Dentimargo  epacrodonta  is  unbanded,  and  has  a narrower  aperture, 
narrower  shoulder  on  body  whorl,  and  well  developed  teeth  inside  the  aperture. 

Etymology:  zetetes — Gr. , a searcher. 

Dentimargo  epacrodonta  new  species 
Figure  15 

Diagnosis:  A small,  ivory-white  Dentimargo  distinguished  from  other  west 
American  species  by  its  narrowly  shouldered  and  anteriorly  constricted  body  whorl 
and  the  presence  of  several  subequal  denticles  a short  distance  inside  aperture. 


1978 


West  American  Marginellidae 


15 


Description  of  holotype:  Shell  rather  small  for  the  genus,  narrowly  biconic,  pro- 
duced anteriorly.  Surface  highly  polished,  unsculptured.  Translucent  ivory-white. 
Body  whorl  constricted  by  a broad,  shallow  sulcus  about  one-third  of  the  distance 
from  anterior  end.  Nucleus  small,  hemispherical,  moderately  projecting.  Spire  high, 
of  three  convex  whorls;  suture  appressed  but  distinct;  “false  suture”  (internal  trace 
of  each  whorl’s  junction  with  previous  whorl)  visible.  Outer  lip  sharp  at  edge  but 
thickened  a short  distance  back,  with  narrow,  steeply  sloping  shoulder  behind  aper- 
ture; straight  along  its  medial  portion;  with  seven  distinct  denticles  a short  distance 
inside  aperture,  of  which  the  most  posterior  and  the  fourth  are  largest,  the  second  and 
third  from  posterior  are  small  and  sharp,  and  the  three  most  anterior  are  low  and 
progressively  less  distinct.  Aperture  moderately  narrow,  produced  anteriorly  and 
somewhat  effuse  toward  anterior  end  of  outer  lip;  posterior  angle  acute;  posterior  notch 
indistinct  (on  paratype;  holotype  broken  here).  Parietal  wall  excavated,  not  calloused. 
Columella  markedly  concave,  with  four  folds  including  fold  at  base  of  columella; 
posterior  two  folds  subparallel,  anterior  two  very  oblique.  Length  3.7  mm,  width  1.7 
mm,  length  of  aperture  2.0  mm. 

Type  locality:  Bottom  sample  AHF  308,  off  Bahia  Honda,  Republic  of  Panama 
(7°  44'  N,  81°  35'  W),  55-64  m.  Collected  by  Allan  Hancock  Pacific  Expedition  of 
1934,  21  February  1934.  Three  specimens. 

Type  material:  Holotype,  LACM-AHF  1783.  Two  paratypes,  LACM-AHF  1784. 

Referred  material:  One  specimen,  bottom  sample  AHF  312,  Secas  Islands,  Re- 
public of  Panama  (approx.  7°  57'  N,  82°  02'  W),  26  m.  Collected  by  Allan  Hancock 
Pacific  Expedition  of  1935,  4 February  1935.  Three  specimens,  bottom  sample  AHF 
307,  off  Secas  Islands  (approx.  7°  50'  N,  82°  00'  W),  73-146  meters.  Collected  by 
Allan  Hancock  Pacific  Expedition  of  1934,  22  February  1934. 

Discussion:  The  ivory  color,  absence  of  banding,  and  narrower  shoulder  distin- 
guish D.  epacrodonta  fromD.  zetetes,  which  in  addition  lacks  the  anterior  constriction 
of  the  body  whorl.  No  other  west  American  species  seems  to  have  the  array  of  aper- 
tural  denticles  shown  by  D.  epacrodonta,  but  identification  should  not  hinge  on  these 
characters  since,  as  demonstrated  in  one  paratype,  the  denticles  may  be  incompletely 
developed.  The  dentition  ofD.  anticlea  (Dali),  as  far  as  seen,  is  dominated  by  a single 
strong  posterior  tooth.  The  nucleus  of  D.  anticlea  is  proportionally  larger  and  less 
projecting. 

Etymology:  Gr. , epakros,  pointed  at  the  end  + odontos,  tooth;  a noun. 

GENUS  VOLV ARINA  HINDS  1844 

Type  species,  by  subsequent  designation,  Redfield  1870,  Marginella  nitida  Hinds  1844  ( =Voluta 

mitrella  Risso  1826);  Recent,  Mediterranean. 

Small,  cylindrical  to  conic;  anterior  notch  absent;  outer  lip  smooth  or  weakly 
denticulate  within;  spire  low  to  moderately  elevated. 

The  status  of  Hyalina  Schumacher  1817  (type  species,  H.  pellucida  Schumacher; 
Recent,  locality  unknown),  used  by  some  workers  for  this  group  of  species,  is  un- 
resolved. Dodge  (1955)  identified//,  pellucida  with  Voluta  pallida  Linnaeus  1767, 
and  considered  the  latter  a recognizable  Caribbean  species.  Woodring  (1970)  regarded 


16 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  292 


Figures  14-16.  14.  Dentimargo  zetetes  new  species,  holotype,  LACM  1781,  length 
4.1  mm.  15.  Dentimargo  epacrodonta  new  species,  holotype,  LACM  1783,  length 
3.7  mm.  16.  Volvarina  innexa  new  species,  holotype,  LACM-AHF  1785,  length  5.3 
mm. 


H.  pellucida  as  unrecognizable  and  the  genus  as  a nomen  dubium.  No  type  specimen 
of  H.  pellucida  is  extant  (J.  Knudsen,  personal  communication);  designation  of  a 
neotype  in  conjunction  with  a revisionary  study  would  resolve  the  question.3 

Volvarina  innexa  new  species 
Figure  16 

Diagnosis:  A small  Volvarina  with  relatively  high  spire,  conic  outline,  and  large 
nucleus,  differing  from  other  west  American  species  by  being  white  with  two  trans- 
lucent spiral  bands  and  having  a narrow  yellow  band  near  the  anterior  end. 

Description  of  holotype:  Shell  small  for  genus,  elongate-conic,  narrower  ante- 
riorly. Surface  highly  polished,  unsculptured.  Translucent  white  with  two  spiral  zones 
of  greater  translucency,  the  first  extending  from  shoulder  of  body  whorl  to  just  below 
suture,  the  second  at  middle  of  body  whorl.  Outer  lip  and  extreme  anterior  end  opaque 
white.  Nucleus  large;  spire  elevated,  nearly  transparent,  with  “false  suture”  (internal 
trace  of  each  whorl’s  junction  with  previous  whorl)  visible;  whorls  of  spire  convex. 
Outer  lip  varicose  externally,  thickest  posterior  to  middle,  slightly  constricted  medi- 
ally, not  denticulate.  Aperture  narrow,  evenly  widening  to  anterior  end;  anterior  mar- 


3Coan  and  Roth  (1976,  Jour.  Moll.  Stud.  42:217-222)  recently  discussed  this  problem  and  des- 
ignated a neotype. 


1978 


West  American  Marginellidae 


17 


gin  evenly  rounded,  without  indentation;  posterior  notch  shallow.  Parietal  wall  mod- 
erately convex,  uncalloused.  Columella  very  slightly  concave,  with  four  equidistant, 
nearly  parallel  folds  including  fold  at  base  of  columella,  the  folds  terminating  distally 
in  a weakly  defined  white  fasciole  with  a pale  yellow  spiral  band  along  its  posterior 
margin.  Length  5.3  mm,  width  2.2  mm. 

Type  locality:  Station  AHF  177-34,  Sullivan  Bay,  James  Island,  Galapagos  Is- 
lands, Ecuador  (0°  16'  30"  S,  90°  35'  15"  W),  9-37  m on  bottom  of  rock  with  sand 
patches.  Collected  by  Allan  Hancock  Pacific  Expedition  of  1934,  23  January  1934. 
One  specimen. 

Type  material:  Holotype,  L ACM- AHF  1785. 

Discussion:  The  high  spire,  prominent  nucleus,  and  conic  outline  of  Volvarina 
innexa  distinguish  it  from  other  west  American  species  of  the  genus,  as  does  its  sin- 
gular color  pattern.  Volvarina  nyssa  Roth  and  Coan  1971,  from  Pinta  and  Genovesa 
Islands,  Galapagos  Islands,  has  a much  lower  spire  and  bright  orange-brown  bands 
on  the  body  whorl.  Volvarina  taeniolata  rosa  (Schwengel  1938)  is  larger,  more  ovate 
in  outline,  and  bright  pink  in  color;  some  specimens  show  brown  banding  like  that 
of  the  nominate  subspecies,  which  ranges  from  southern  California  to  Central  Amer- 
ica. Some  specimens  from  the  Gulf  of  California,  like  those  referred  to  Volvarina 
taeniolata  by  Coan  and  Roth  (1966:  pi.  50,  figs.  54,  55),  resemble  V.  innexa  in  their 
pale  coloration  and  high  spire.  They  do  not  however  have  the  large  nucleus  of  the 
new  species.  The  columellar  folds  of  V.  innexa  seem  to  be  proportionally  the  largest 
of  any  west  American  Volvarina  examined.  I interpret  V.  innexa  as  an  eastern  Pacific 
representative  of  the  group  of  high-spired  Caribbean  Marginellidae  which  includes 
Volvarina  veliei  (Pilsbry  1896)  and  V.  avenacea  (Deshayes  1844). 

Etymology:  innexa — L. , joined. 

RESUMEN 

Se  describen  seis  nuevas  especies  de  Marginellidae:  Prunum  ( Prunum ) gorgo- 
nense  de  la  Isla  Gorgona,  Colombia;  Prunum  {Prunum)  macleani  de  la  Republica  del 
Ecuador;  Prunum  ( Microspira ) aletes  y Dentimargo  zetetes  de  la  costa  Pacifica  de 
Costa  Rica;  Dentimargo  epacrodonta  de  la  Republica  de  Panama;  y Volvarina  innexa 
de  las  Islas  Galapagos.  Prunum  ( Microspira ) aletes  se  parece  a algunas  especies  Car- 
ibes  y a especies  Neogenos  de  Florida.  Prunum  {Prunum)  curtum  (Sowerby)  se  ex- 
tiende  hasta  aguas  templados  al  sur  de  la  provincia  Panamica;  su  presencia  en  el  Golfo 
de  Panama  requiere  confirmacion.  La  radula  de  Prunum  {Prunum)  woodbridgei  (Her- 
tlein  y Strong)  se  ilustra;  concuerda  bien  con  la  radula  de  Prunum  storerium  (Couth- 
ouy).  Dentimargo  anticlea  (Dali) — identificacion  tentativa — se  encuentra  en  varias 
localidades  en  las  Islas  Galapagos. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Abbott,  R.  T.  1957.  Prunum  roscidum  in  New  Jersey.  Nautilus  7(2):52-53,  pi.  4,  figs.  4,  4a. 
. 1958.  The  marine  mollusks  of  Grand  Cayman  Island,  British  West  Indies.  Acad.  Nat. 

Sci.  Philadelphia,  Monogr.  11:1-138,  pis.  1-5. 


18 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  292 


Akers,  W.  H.1974.  Age  of  Pinecrest  Beds,  south  Florida.  Tulane  Stud.  Geol.,  Paleontol. 

1 1(2):  1 19-120. 

Bayer,  F.  M.1943.  Observations  on  marine  Mollusca,  with  descriptions  of  new  species.  Nau- 
tilus 56(4):  109-1 15,  pis.  12,  14. 

Carcelles,  A.  1944.  Catalogo  de  los  moluscos  marinos  de  Puerto  Quequen  (Republica  Argen- 
tina). Revista  del  Museo  de  La  Plata  (N.S.)  3 (Zool.  23):233-309,  pis.  1-15. 

Clench,  W.  J.  and  R.  D.  Turner.  1950.  The  western  Atlantic  marine  mollusks  described  by 
C.  B.  Adams.  Occas.  Pap.  Moll.  l(15):233-403,  pis.  29-49. 

Coan,  E.  V.  and  B.  Roth.  1966.  The  west  American  Marginellidae.  Veliger  8(4):276-299, 
pis.  48-51,  text-figs.  1-5. 

Dall,  W.  H.  1890. Contributions  to  the  Tertiary  fauna  of  Florida,  with  especial  reference  to  the 
Miocene  silex-beds  of  Tampa  and  the  Pliocene  beds  of  the  Caloosahatchie  River.  Part  I. 
Pulmonate,  opisthobranchiate  and  orthodont  gastropods.  Wagner  Free  Inst.  Sci.  Philadel- 
phia, Trans.  3(l):l-200,  pis.  1-12. 

. 1892.  Contributions  to  the  Tertiary  fauna  of  Florida,  with  especial  reference  to  the 

Miocene  silex-beds  of  Tampa  and  the  Pliocene  beds  of  the  Caloosahatchie  River.  Part  II. 
Streptodont  and  other  gastropods,  concluded.  Wagner  Free  Inst.  Sci.  Philadelphia,  Trans. 
3(2):20 1 -473 , pis.  13-22. 

. 1919.  Descriptions  of  new  species  of  Mollusca  from  the  North  Pacific  Ocean  in  the 

collection  of  the  United  States  National  Museum.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.,  Proc.  56(2295):293- 
371. 

Dodge,  H.1955.  A historical  review  of  the  mollusks  of  Linnaeus.  Part  3.  The  genera  Bulla  and 
Voluta  of  the  class  Gastropoda.  Amer.  Mus.  Nat.  Hist.,  Bull.  107(1):  1-158. 

Hertlein,  L.  G.  and  A.  M.  Strong.  1951.  Descriptions  of  three  new  species  of  marine  gas- 
tropods from  west  Mexico  and  Guatemala.  So.  California  Acad.  Sci.,  Bull.  50(2):76-80, 
pi.  26,  figs.  1-4,  8. 

Keen,  A.  M.1971.  Sea  shells  of  tropical  west  America:  Marine  mollusks  from  Baja  California 
to  Peru.  Stanford  Univ.  Press,  Stanford,  California,  xiv  + 1064  p.,  22  pis.  [Marginellidae, 
pp.  632-638,  by  Coan  and  Roth.] 

Olsson,  A.  A.  1964.  Neogene  mollusks  from  northwestern  Ecuador.  Paleontol.  Res.  Inst.,  Ith- 
aca, New  York,  256  p.,  36  pis. 

. 1967.  Some  Tertiary  mollusks  from  south  Florida  and  the  Caribbean.  Paleontol.  Res. 

Inst.,  Ithaca,  New  York,  61  p. , 8 pis. 

Reeve,  L.  A.  1864  [1864-1865],  Monograph  of  the  genus  Marginella.  In:  Conchologia  iconica: 
or  illustrations  of  the  shells  of  molluscous  animals  15,  pis.  2-13  [1864],  pis.  1,  14-27, 
index,  errata  [1865]. 

Roth,  B.  and  E.  V.  Coan.  1971 . Marginellidae  (Mollusca:  Neogastropoda)  from  the  Galapagos 
Islands  and  Cocos  Island.  Proc.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci.  (4)37(23):575-584,  text-figs.  1-5. 

Sowerby,  G.  B.,  1.1832.  Characters  of  new  species  of  Mollusca  and  Conchifera  collected  by 
Mr.  Cuming.  Proc.  Zool.  Soc.  London  2 [part  2]  (18):  104- 108. 

Tryon,  G.  W.,  Jr.  1 882[  1 882- 1 883] . Family  Marginellidae.  In:  Manual  of  conchology;  struc- 
tural and  systematic  5.  Marginellidae  (17):  5-58,  pis.  2-13  [1882];  (20):197-255  [1883]. 

Woodring,  W.  P.1970.  Geology  and  paleontology  of  Canal  Zone  and  adjoining  parts  of  Pan- 
ama. Description  of  Tertiary  mollusks  (Gastropods:  Eulimidae,  Marginellidae  to  Helminth- 
oglyptidae).  U.  S.  Geol.  Surv.,  Prof.  Paper  306-D:299-452,  pis.  48-66. 

Accepted  for  publication  October  27,  1976. 


5 Ol>  7 


0mmw^ 

MAY  2 2 1978  * 


NUMBER  293 
MAY  15,  1978 


MCCOSKERICHTHYS  SANDAE, 
A NEW  AND  UNUSUAL  CHAENOPSID  BLENNY 
FROM  THE  PACIFIC  COAST  OF  PANAMA  AND  COSTA  RICA 


By  Richard  H.  Rosenblatt  and  John  S.  Stephens,  Jr. 


■ 


NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCENCC 


Published  by  the  NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM 
OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007 


SERIAL  PUBLICATIONS  OP  THE 
NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 


Prior  to  November  30,  1973,  publications  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  have  appeared 
under  various  formats — Leaflet  Series , Museum  Graphic,  Science  Series,  Study  Guides,  Con- 
tributions in  Science,  Contributions  in  History,  Science  Bulletins,  unnumbered  catalogs  of 
exhibitions,  and  other  miscellaneous  publications.  The  Museum  now  publishes  the  following 
serials  at  irregular  intervals  as  CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE,  HISTORY  BULLETINS, 
SCIENCE  BULLETINS,  EDUCATION  SERIES,  HISTORY  SERIES,  and  SCIENCE  SE- 
RIES. The  Contributions  are  short  papers  of  octavo  size.  The  Bulletins  are  longer,  compre- 
hensive papers  of  quarto  size.  The  Series  are  papers  of  variable  lengths  of  quarto  or  larger 
size.  Papers  in  each  serial  are  numbered  separately  and  consecutively. 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  contain  articles  in  the  earth  and  life  sciences,  presenting 
results  of  original  research.  Emphasis  is  intended  principally  for  papers  allied  to  biosystematic 
research,  but  other  subjects  and  review-oriented  ones  will  be  considered.  Number  1 was  issued 
on  January  23,  1957.  Contributions  must  be  not  less  than  8 nor  exceed  72  printed  pages. 


INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  AUTHORS 

Acceptance  of  manuscripts  will  be  determined  by  the  significance  of  new  information.  Priority 
will  be  given  to  manuscripts  by  staff  members.  All  manuscripts  must  be  recommended  by  the 
curator  in  charge  of  each  discipline  or  by  the  Editorial  Board.  Manuscripts  must  conform  to 
the  specifications  listed  below.  They  will  be  examined  for  suitability  by  the  Editorial  Board 
and  will  include  review  by  specialists  outside  the  Museum. 

Authors  must  adhere  to  the  International  Code  of  Nomenclature  of  Bacteria  and  Viruses, 
International  Code  of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  and  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature, including  their  respective  recommendations.  Further,  authors  proposing  new  taxa  in 
a CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  must  indicate  that  all  primary  types  have  been  deposited 
in  an  appropriate  scientific  institution  of  their  choice  and  must  cite  that  institution  by  name. 

MANUSCRIPT  FORM. — (1)  In  preparation  of  copy  follow  the  1972  CBE  Style  Manual, 
third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapters  5 and  6.  (2)  Footnotes  should  be  avoided;  acknowledgments 
as  footnotes  will  not  be  accepted.  (3)  An  informative  abstract  must  be  included  for  all  papers. 
(4)  A Spanish  summary  is  required  for  all  manuscripts  dealing  with  Latin  American  subjects. 
Summaries  in  other  languages  are  not  required  but  are  strongly  recommended.  (5)  A differ- 
ential diagnosis  must  accompany  any  newly  proposed  taxon.  (6)  Submit  two  copies  of  manu- 
script. 

ILLUSTRATIONS. — All  illustrations,  including  maps  and  photographs,  will  be  referred  to 
as  figures.  All  illustrations  should  be  of  sufficient  clarity  and  in  proper  proportions  for  reduc- 
tion to  CONTRIBUTIONS  page  size.  In  preparing  illustrations  and  legends  consult  the  1972 
CBE  Style  Manual,  third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapter  5.  Submit  only  illustrations  made  with 
permanent  ink  and  glossy  photographic  prints  of  good  contrast.  Submit  duplicate  copies  of 
all  illustrations.  Original  illustrations  will  be  returned  after  the  manuscript  has  been  published. 

PROOF. — Authors  will  be  sent  galley  proofs  which  should  be  corrected  and  returned  promptly. 
No  changes  or  alterations,  other  than  typesetting  corrections,  will  be  allowed  unless  paid  by 
author.  Requests  for  reprints  may  be  placed  through  the  Editor. 

R.  Edward  Ostermeyer 
Editor 


All  communications  concerning  manuscripts  and  exchange  of  or  purchase  of  publications 
should  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Museum  Publications,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 

Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America  by  Chapman’s  Phototypesetting  on  70#  Patina  Book 


MCCOSKERICHTHYS  SANDAE,  A NEW  AND  UNUSUAL  CHAENOPSID 

BLENNY 

FROM  THE  PACIFIC  COAST  OF  PANAMA  AND  COSTA  RICA1’2 


by  Richard  H.  Rosenblatt3  and  John  S.  Stephens,  Jr.4 


Abstract:  A new  genus  and  species  of  chaenopsid  blenny  is  described,  based 
upon  a series  of  651  specimens.  This  new  species  occurs  at  depths  ranging  from 
1 to  30  meters  along  the  Pacific  coast  of  Costa  Rica  and  Panama.  It  is  a tube  dwelling 
biennioid  fish,  living  along  near- vertical  rock  faces  or  coral  heads.  This  new  chaenop- 
sid is  unique  in  having  the  following  combination  of  characters:  four  circumorbital 
bones,  ectopterygoid  teeth,  jaw  with  spatulate  teeth  on  outer  row  but  granular  ones 
on  inner  row,  five  orbital  cirri,  a blunt  head,  17-20  spines  and  31-34  soft  rays  in 
dorsal  fin,  2 spines  and  32-36  soft  rays  in  anal  fin,  and  54-57  vertebrae.  The  rela- 
tionships of  the  new  genus  are  discussed  as  they  relate  to  the  clinidlike  blenny  families 
(Clinidae,  Chaenopsidae,  Tripterygiidae).  Osteological  features  are  discussed  and  il- 
lustrated, and  their  interpretation  as  evidence  of  evolutionary  significance  is  presented. 


INTRODUCTION 

In  1971  while  on  fellowship  to  the  Smithsonian  Tropical  Research  Institute  in 
Panama,  John  E.  McCosker  collected  and  made  observations  on  a new  species  of  tube 
dwelling  biennioid  fish.  Extensive  series  of  this  species  were  also  taken  by  McCosker 
and  Rosenblatt  during  the  Janss  Foundation  expedition  to  Costa  Rica  on  the  R/V 
SEARCHER . The  characteristics  of  this  species  are  so  distinctive  that  it  cannot  be 
assigned  to  any  known  genus,  but  its  characteristics  certainly  ally  it  to  the  family 
Chaenopsidae. 


’Review  Committee  for  this  Contribution 
Robert  J.  Lavenberg 
Richard  Robins 
Victor  G.  Springer 

Contribution  from  the  Scripps  Institution  of  Oceanography. 

3Scripps  Institution  of  Oceanography,  University  of  California  at  San  Diego,  La  Jolla,  California 
92093. 

4 Department  of  Biology,  Occidental  College,  Los  Angeles,  California  90041. 


2 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  293 


Mccoskerichthys  new  genus 
Figure  1 

Diagnosis:  A chaenopsid  with  the  following  unique  combination  of  characters: 
four  circumorbital  bones,  teeth  on  the  ectoptergoid,  outer  row  of  jaw  teeth  spatulate, 
teeth  of  inner  rows  granular,  5 pairs  of  orbital  cirri  and  a combination  of  blunt  head 
and  high  dorsal,  anal  and  vertebral  counts.  Other  characters  those  of  the  single  in- 
cluded species. 

Type  species:  Mccoskerichthys  sandae  new  species 

Derivation  of  name:  Named  for  John  E.  McCosker,  who  discovered  the  species 
and  has  participated  in  the  collection  of  all  known  specimens. 

RELATIONSHIPS 

Bohlke  and  C.  H.  Robins  (1974)  in  describing  the  new  clinid  genus  Haptoclinus 
discussed  certain  characters  of  this  monotypic  genus  that  they  regarded  as  breaking 
down  the  separation  of  the  three  often  recognized  clinidlike  blenny  families:  the  Clin- 
idae,  Chaenopsidae  and  Tripterygiidae.  They  recognized  only  the  family  Clinidae, 
admitting  that  the  chaenopsids  and  tripterygiids  represent  lines  of  divergence  within 
the  family,  but  suggested  that  other  equally  distinct  clinid  subgroups  may  later  be 
defined.  However,  the  characters  given  for  Haptoclinus  apectolophus  do  not  seem  to 
indicate  relationship  to  chaenopsids;  in  fact,  all  its  characters  are  typically  clinid. 
There  is  also  very  little  evidence  presented  allying  Haptoclinus  to  the  tripterygiids. 
Haptoclinus  represents  a specialized  clinid,  perhaps  allied  to  Paraclinus . 

It  may  well  be  that  uniting  all  clinidlike  or  clinid-derived  fishes  into  a single 
family  is  the  best  way  to  treat  these  relationships  but  unfortunately  the  discussion  by 
Bohlke  and  Robins  (1974)  is  mostly  irrelevant  to  this  problem.  We,  therefore,  will 
continue  to  treat  clinids,  chaenopsids  and  tripterygiids  as  separate  blennioid  families. 

The  morphological  characters  given  in  the  diagnosis  of  Mccoskerichthys  indicate 
its  isolated  position  within  the  family  Chaenopsidae.  Any  one  of  these  characters  dis- 
tinguishes this  genus  from  all  other  known  chaenopsids,  and  the  presence  of  ectop- 
teryoid  teeth  is  unique  within  the  Blennioidei.  If  these  special  characters  are  ignored, 
Mccoskerichthys  seems  to  be  most  closely  related  to  the  Protemblemaria  to  Acan- 
themblemaria  line  of  chaenopsids  in  that  the  paired  nasals  have  fused  medially  into 


Figure  1 . Mccoskerichthys  sandae,  Holotype 


1978 


New  Chaenopsid  Blenny 


3 


a single  element  and  the  frontals  (parietal  of  Jollie  1962;  Stephens  1963)  are  ridged 
and  sculptured  (Fig.  3).  Further,  there  is  a tendency  toward  modified  dentition  in  this 
evolutionary  line.  The  species  of  Chaenopsis  agree  with  Mccoskerichthys  in  having 
a high  number  of  vertebrae  and  dorsal  and  anal  soft  rays,  as  well  as  the  correlated 
characters  of  a reduced  number  of  caudal  peduncle  vertebrae  and  the  absence  of  dorsal 
pterygiophores  anterior  to  the  first  vertebra,  but  are  otherwise  very  different. 

Stephens  (1963)  listed  13  characters  he  considered  to  represent  the  primitive  con- 
dition in  chaenopsids.  Mccoskerichthys  exhibits  the  primitive  condition  in  six  char- 
acters (snout  shape,  orbital  cirri,  palatovomerine  dentition,  upper  jaw  length  dimor- 
phism, median  fin  height  and  circumorbital  width).  Although  relatively  slender 
circumorbitals  were  considered  to  be  primitive  by  Stephens,  this  character  needs  clar- 
ification. The  primitive  condition  is  better  described  as  a slender  lachrymal  and  the 
advanced  character  a ventrally  expanded  lachrymal  as  in  most  Coralliozetus  (8  8 )and 
most  species  of  Acanthemblemaria  (Figs.  6-9).  The  other  circumorbitals  are  relatively 
stout  primitively  (Stephens  1963,  fig.  2A  and  B).  The  slender  circumorbital  ring  is 
found  in  almost  all  species  of  the  Emblemariopsis  to  Chaenopsis  line,  though  several 
species  of  Emblemaria  show  a modified,  stouter  ring.  The  circumorbital  ring  of 
Mccoskerichthys  is  similar  to  that  of  Neoclinus,  a clinid  considered  close  to  the  an- 
cestral chaenopsid  lineage,  in  that  there  are  four  bones,  the  lachrymal  is  slender  and 


Figure  2.  Mccoskerichthys  sandae,  a living  individual  in  a tube  in  the  coral  panona. 
Photo  taken  by  Edwin  Janss  at  Isla  del  Cano  Costa  Rica  in  March,  1973. 


4 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  293 


the  other  three  circumorbitals  (postorbitals)  relatively  stout.  Neoclinus  has  a distinct 
dermosphenotic  not  present  in  Mccoskerichthys  or  other  chaenopsids. 

The  four  circumorbitals,  blunt  snout  and  low  nondimorphic  dorsal  fin  impart  a 
primitive  facies  to  Mccoskerichthys . The  strongly  modified  dentition,  presence  of  teeth 
on  the  ectopterygoid,  and  the  elongate  body  are  specializations  but  do  not  argue 
against  a primitive  origin.  If  the  presence  of  four  circumorbital  bones  indeed  represents 
the  retention  of  a primitive  character,  then  Mccoskerichthys  must  have  evolved  prior 
to  the  division  of  the  chaenopsids  into  the  Protemblemaria  to  Acanthemblemaria  and 
Emblemariopsis  to  Chaenopsis  lineages,  as  the  circumorbitals  are  reduced  in  both. 
If  Mccoskerichthys  diverged  this  early,  however,  it  is  difficult  to  explain  its  numerous 
apomorphic  characters  shared  with  members  of  the  Protemblemaria  to  Acanthemble- 
maria lineage,  i.e.  a single  fused  nasal,  cranial  sculpturing,  specialized  incisor  and 
molariform  dentition,  as  well  as  short  and  stout  pelvic  fins. 

Mccoskerichthys  is  certainly  not  particularly  clinidlike:  the  body  is  scaleless,  and 
the  lateral  line  absent,  most  of  the  head  pores  are  simple,  there  is  a single  epural,  and 
the  fifth  hypural  (minimal  hypural)  is  not  identifiable  nor  are  the  dermosphenotic  and 
median  and  lateral  extrascapulars.  All  of  these  are  chaenopsid  characters.  Typically 
there  are  two  epurals  and  the  fifth  (minimal)  hypural  in  the  Clinidae  and  the  der- 
mosphenotic and  one  or  more  extrascapulars  are  present.  It  must  be  stressed,  however, 
that  the  chaenopsid  condition  in  these  osteological  characters  is  approximated  by 
Stathmonotus  and  Starksia  and  in  one  or  more  characters  by  other  clinids.  An  addi- 
tional chaenopsid  character,  the  presence  of  a well  defined  anteriorly  projecting  lateral 
process  on  the  hyomandibular  (Figs.  6,  7,  and  9)  has  been  examined  by  Springer 
(personal  communication).  This  hook  is  certainly  characteristic  of  most  species  but 
appears  to  be  absent  in  Coralliozetus  (Fig.  8)  and  those  species  of  Emblemariopsis 
that  we  have  examined.  This  process  is  at  best  rudimentary  in  Mccoskerichthys  (Fig. 
3). 

It  is  difficult  to  evaluate  the  phyletic  significance  of  the  presence  of  four  separate 
postorbital  bones  in  Mccoskerichthys . It  would  be  especially  helpful  to  know  whether 
there  are  three  postorbital  centers  of  ossification  or  only  one  in  the  rest  of  the  chaen- 
opsids. If  there  are  three,  joints  could  easily  be  regained;  if  one,  it  is  likely  that  the 
separate  bones  of  Mccoskerichthys  represent  a primitive  condition.  The  fact  that  the 
postorbital  of  other  chaenopsids  anomalously  may  show  separate  elements  suggests 
that  several  centers  of  ossification  are  present  and  that  these  normally  fuse  during 
development. 

It  is  our  interpretation,  based  on  parsimony,  that  Mccoskerichthys  evolved  after 
the  main  chaenopsid  features  had  appeared,  and  that  it  represents  an  offshoot  of  the 
Protemblemaria  to  Acanthemblemaria  line  close  to  Ekemblemaria  in  the  phylogenetic 
diagram  given  by  Stephens  (1970)  but  has  lost  the  fusion  of  the  postorbitals.  This 
phyletic  position  eliminates  the  difficulty  of  interpreting  the  synapomorphies  of  the 
Mccoskerichthys  and  the  Protemblemaria  to  Acanthemblemaria  specjes. 

Mccoskerichthys  also  agrees  with  the  Chaenopsidae  in  another  feature,  which  has 
not  previously  been  noted.  In  chaenopsids  the  maxilla  is  not  visible  externally.  An- 
teriorly it  slips  beneath  the  lower  free  margin  and  posterior  projection  of  the  lachrymal 
(the  postorbital  or  second  circumorbital  usually  forms  the  dorsal  parts  of  the  projec- 


1978 


New  Chaenopsid  Blenny 


5 


tion).  Posteriorly,  a free  fold  of  skin  extends  from  the  postero ventral  angle  of  the 
circumorbitals  across  the  cheek  forming  a pocket  covering  the  maxilla.  This  pocket 
is  variously  developed  but  present  in  all  species.  It  is  best  developed  in  Chaenopsis , 
in  which  the  maxilla  extends  far  beyond  the  rear  margin  of  the  eye,  and  least  developed 
in  forms  where  the  maxilla  is  short  or  the  posterior  expansion  of  the  circumorbital 
ring  is  large.  In  Mccoskerichthys  the  posterior  extension  of  the  lachrymal  and  the 
second  circumorbital  cover  all  but  the  posterior  tip  of  the  maxilla  and  the  free  fold 
is  rudimentary.  Emblemaria  has  a reduced  fold,  but  the  maxilla  is  buried  beneath  the 
skin  and  there  is  a fold  across  its  tip.  This  character  is  approximated  in  some  genera 
of  clinids  including  Stcithmonotus  and  Malacoctenus  but  not  Haptoclinus . 

The  effect  of  these  structural  chaenopsid  modifications  is  to  limit  the  lateral  ex- 
pansion of  the  jaws.  Because  of  the  limited  protusibility  of  the  premaxilla,  the  maxilla 
is  but  little  rotated  downward  when  the  mouth  is  opened.  Illustrations  of  threat  display 
in  which  the  mouth  is  opened  widely  in  Chaenopsis  and  Emblemaria  (Robins,  Phillips 
and  Phillips  1959,  text  fig.  1,  PI.  3,  figs.  1 and  2;  Wickler  1964)  indicate  that  the 
maxilla  remains  closely  applied  to  the  cheek.  The  rigidly  fused  circumorbital  ring  of 
chaenopsids  further  limits  lateral  mobility  of  the  maxilla. 

It  is  possible  that  the  early  chaenopsids  were  omnivorous  nibblers,  and  that  the 
change  to  plankton-picking,  characteristic  of  most  members  of  the  family  (species  of 
Coralliozetus , Acanthemblemaris , Protemblemaria,  and  Emblemaria  examined,  see 
also  Stephens,  Hobson  and  Johnson  1966;  Hobson  1968)  was  correlated  with  increas- 
ing reliance  on  the  tubiculous  habit.  Chaenopsis  and  Lucayablennius  (Hobson  1968; 
Greenfield  1972)  have  become  predators  on  relatively  large  food  items,  and  the  gape 
is  proportionately  long,  but  the  basic  chaenopsid  jaw  structure  is  otherwise  little  mod- 
ified. The  chisellike  teeth  of  Mccoskerichthys  hardly  seem  adapted  to  plankton  feed- 
ing, yet  observations  and  gut  analyses  suggest  this  mode  of  existence. 

Mccoskerichthys  sandae  new  species 
Figures  1,  2 

Morphology:  Terminology  is  that  of  Stephens  1970.  Counts  and  measurements 
of  certain  body  parts  are  given  in  Tables  1 and  2.  Body  greatly  elongated  for  a chae- 
nopsid, approaching  the  species  of  Chaenopsis  in  this  respect,  body  depth  at  dorsal 
origin  10-12  in  standard  length.  Body  strongly  compressed;  its  dorsal  and  ventral 
outlines  with  little  posterior  taper.  Head  length  5. 5-7.0  in  standard  length,  head  width 
slightly  less  than  its  depth.  Snout  short  and  rounded,  lips  projecting  because  of  broad, 
projecting  incisors;  snout  length  from  two-thirds  of,  to  almost  equal  to,  eye  diameter, 
difficult  to  measure  accurately,  because  of  anterior  excavation  of  orbit.  Eyes  directed 
anteriad  as  well  as  laterad,  pupil  round;  diameter  of  eye  3. 5-4. 5 in  head.  Interorbital 
narrow,  rim  of  orbit  incised  anteriorly  to  accommodate  anteriorly  directed  eyes,  and 
posteriorly  to  accommodate  orbital  cirri.  Orbital  cirri  forming  a bushy  mass,  which 
completely  covers  interorbital  region.  Cirral  mass  composed  of  five  pairs  of  cirri;  each 
cirrus  with  a stout  base  and  at  least  two  major  branches,  one  medial  and  one  lateral, 
each  branch  complexly  multifid  and  with  short  lateral  branches,  imparting  a ragged 


6 Contributions  in  Science  No.  293 


Table  1 

Meristic  variations  in 

Mccoskerichthys  sandae. 

Total  Dorsal  Elements 

50 

51 

52 

53 

8 

19 

14 

6 

Dorsal  Spines 

XVII 

XVIII 

XIX 

XX 

4 

12 

26 

5 

Dorsal  Soft  Rays 

31 

32 

33 

34 

3 

17 

19 

8 

Anal  Soft  Rays 

32 

33 

34 

35  36 

1 

1 

23 

21  1 

Pectoral  Rays* 

12 

13 

14 

5 

85 

2 

Total  Vertebrae 

54 

55 

56 

57 

6 

32 

12 

4 

*2  damaged  pectoral  fins  with  10  and  1 1 rays 


appearance.  Cirral  mass  extends  from  posterior  edge  of  postorbital  flange  of  frontal 
to  anterior  margin  of  eye  at  level  of  center  of  pupil;  height  of  mass  slightly  less  than 
eye  diameter. 

Top  of  head  behind  eyes  with  a series  of  transverse  folds,  which  become  lon- 
gitudinal and  converge  toward  dorsal  commissural  pore;  folds  originate  anteriorly 
about  at  junction  of  frontals  with  circumorbitals  and  reflect  underlying  bony  ridges. 
A crescentic  fold  at  occiput,  outlining  anterior  extent  of  body  musculature.  Fold  re- 
duced in  females  and  absent  in  juveniles,  although  bony  ridges  may  be  seen. 

Upper  jaw  horizontal,  terminating  behind  eye,  its  length  about  1.3-1. 5 in  post- 
orbital head  length.  Maxilla  in  males  extending  slightly  beyond  end  of  posteroventral 
expansion  of  circumorbitals,  rather  than  ending  beneath  it  as  in  females.  Upper  jaw 
with  a pair  of  recurved  incisors,  one  on  either  side  of  symphysis,  followed  by  three 
enlarged,  somewhat  forward-directed,  spatulate  incisors;  posterolateral  to  these  a row 


1978 


New  Chaenopsid  Blenny 


7 


Table  2 

Measurements  in  millimeters  of  body  parts  of  the  holotype  and 
ten  paratypes  of  Mccoskerichthys  sandae 


Holotype 


Standard  length 

62.5 

63.5 

65.0 

69.5 

Head  Length 

10.0 

9.6 

10.0 

10.0 

Head  Depth 

5.5 

5.1 

5.6 

5.9 

Head  Width 

5.4 

5.3 

5.7 

5.5 

Upper  Jaw  Length 

4.9 

4.3 

4.5 

4.5 

Snout  Length 

1.9 

1.7 

1.9 

2.0 

Eye  Diameter 

2.1 

2.3 

2.1 

2.0 

Interorbit  Width 

.9 

.9 

.9 

.9 

Predorsal  Length 

8.0 

7.9 

7.9 

8.5 

Preanal  Length 

25.5 

25.0 

26.1 

27.8 

Body  Depth  at  Anus 

5.7 

4.8 

5.3 

5.2 

62.6 

59.9 

62.5 

62.0 

69.1 

65.7 

65.0 

9.7 

9.9 

9.6 

9.6 

9.3 

9.6 

9.5 

5.0 

4.9 

5.5 

5.1 

5.6 

5.4 

5.5 

5.0 

5.1 

5.9 

5.4 

5.8 

5.4 

5.1 

4.5 

4.9 

4.9 

4.0 

5.0 

4.6 

4.4 

1.6 

1.6 

1.9 

1.9 

1.9 

1.9 

1.5 

2.0 

2.3 

2.1 

2.1 

2.0 

2.3 

2.1 

.8 

.7 

.7 

.6 

.8 

.6 

.7 

7.9 

8.0 

8.0 

7.9 

8.0 

8.0 

7.8 

24.6 

24.5 

25.0 

25.4 

26.0 

27.0 

25.6 

4.9 

4.8 

5.5 

5.6 

5.6 

5.0 

5.5 

of  7-10  smaller,  downward  directed,  stout  incisors.  A patch  of  granular  teeth  ante- 
riorly behind  large  incisors,  continued  as  a single  row  behind  small  incisors.  Dentition 
of  lower  jaw  similar  to  that  of  upper  except  that  there  are  no  small  symphysial  incisors, 
and  there  is  a pair  of  stout,  conical,  almost  caniniform  teeth,  one  on  each  side  of 
symphysis,  behind  patch  of  granular  teeth.  About  6 short,  stout,  teeth  on  vomer.  Palate 
with  a patch  of  teeth  anteriorly  on  palatine,  narrowing  to  two  rows  posteriorly;  ec- 
topterygoid  with  a zig-zag  row  of  ten  teeth.  Anterior  nostril  just  above  upper  lip,  with 
a short  tube  bearing  two  tentacles  on  its  rim,  one  anterior  and  one  posterior.  Posterior 
nostril  just  behind  anterior.  Cranial  sensory  pores  mostly  simple,  except  over  postor- 
bital bones;  preoperculomandibular  series  with  1 commissural,  3 occipital,  1 lateral, 
and  1 temporal,  6-7  preopercular  and  5 mandibular  anterior  to  corner  of  mouth;  post- 
orbital series  with  2 pores;  supraorbital  series  with  4 pores.  No  pores  on  body  posterior 
to  upper  corner  of  gill  opening. 

Gill  membranes  united,  free  from  isthmus;  branchiostegals  6.  Gill  rakers  4- 
5+11-12  on  first  arch  in  five  specimens  counted. 

Total  dorsal  fin  rays  50-53;  XVII-XX,  31-34.  Dorsal  origin  above  upper  anterior 
comer  (formed  by  attachment  of  opercle  membrane  to  body)  of  operculum.  All  rays 
evenly  spaced,  first  spine  short,  two-thirds  length  of  second,  subsequent  rays  sub- 
equal, with  middle  of  soft  dorsal  somewhat  higher;  longest  soft  rays  1.5  X first  and 
last  soft  rays. 

No  notch  between  spinous  and  soft  dorsal,  last  ray  attached  for  its  entire  length 
by  a membrane  inserting  on  middle  third  of  dorsalmost  segmented  caudal  ray.  Anal 
fin  II,  32-36,  all  soft  rays  evenly  spaced,  spines  slightly  closer  together.  First  spine 
short,  one-half  length  of  second,  and  one-third  as  long  as  first  soft-ray.  Soft-rays 
subequal,  last  ray  attached  as  last  dorsal  ray  but  to  ventralmost  procurrent  caudal  ray. 
Caudal  rounded,  with  13  segmented  rays  and  3-6  procurrent  rays;  only  one  procurrent 
ray  visible  dorsally  and  one  ventrally.  Pectorals  rounded,  about  1.5  in  head  length, 
rays  12-14.  Pel  vies  short,  about  two-thirds  pectoral  length,  I,  3,  spine  short,  closely 


8 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  293 


applied  to  first  soft-ray,  soft-rays  joined  by  membrane,  middle  ray  longest.  Male  with 
a well-developed,  fingerlike  genital  papilla,  female  with  numerous  short,  flattened, 
fleshy  processes  around  anus,  and  a short,  broad  genital  papilla. 

Osteological  characteristics:  The  important  cranial  and  caudal  characters  of 
Mccoskerichthys  sandae  are  presented  in  figures  3-5.  Comparative  illustrations  of 
Protemblemaria  to  Acanthemblemaria  are  presented  in  figures  6-14.  Worthy  of  note 
for  Mccoskerichthys  are:  the  specialized  anterior  dentition,  well-hidden  maxillary, 
posteroventrally  expanded  circumorbital  ring;  3 postorbital  elements;  fused  nasals, 
sculptured  frontals;  single  epural  oriented  almost  vertically;  absence  of  distinct  min- 
imal hypural;  close  association  of  last  dorsal  and  anal  pterygiophore  to  caudal  (3  ver- 
tebrae between  urostyle  and  last  pterygiophore).  Two  additional  osteological  char- 
acteristics of  this  species  that  may  be  worthy  of  note  are  the  presence  of  3 anal 
pterygiophores  anterior  to  the  first  haemal  arch  (typical  of  chaenopsids)  and  the  lack 
of  any  dorsal  pterygiophores  anterior  to  the  first  vertebra  (all  chaenopsids  except 
Chaenopsis  have  2-3  pterygiophores  anterior  to  the  first  vertebra). 

Color  in  alcohol:  Males  are  dark  brown  to  tan  with  a series  of  darker  marks  on 
the  sides.  The  dark  markings  vary  from  squarish  or  almost  circular  blotches  to  bars. 
When  blotches  are  present  there  is  usually  a series  of  about  8 along  the  dorsal  base 
and  a series  of  10-12  more  or  less  centered  on  the  midline.  When  bars  are  present 
there  are  usually  about  10-12.  The  bars  are  irregular,  and  may  be  split  by  light  centers. 
The  head  is  notably  lighter  than  the  body,  but  there  is  much  variability.  In  some 
individuals  only  the  snout,  jaws  and  lower  surface  of  the  head  are  much  lighter  than 
the  sides.  The  cheeks  and  opercles  are  usually  darker  than  the  anterior  and  ventral 
parts  of  the  head.  The  orbital  cirri  appear  pale,  but  are  dusted  with  melanophores. 
Often  the  light  coloration  of  the  head  extends  onto  the  body  and  there  is  a sharp  line 
of  demarcation  extending  from  the  pectoral  base  to  the  dorsal,  between  the  third  and 
fourth  spines.  The  line  of  demarcation  is  accentuated  by  a dark  bar  behind  the  fourth 
dorsal  spine.  The  belly  is  dusted  with  chromatophores  and  varies  from  lighter  than 
the  sides  to  almost  as  dark  as  them.  The  folds  around  the  anus  are  outlined  in  black 
and  the  genital  papilla  is  contrastingly  white.  There  is  much  variability  in  coloration: 
in  some  individuals  the  body  is  light  with  the  dark  markings  strongly  contrasted,  in 
others  the  body  is  dark  brown  and  the  markings  difficult  to  discern.  This  variation  in 
coloration  is  not  correlated  with  size,  but  may  be  related  to  breeding  condition. 

The  median  fins  are  clear,  except  that  the  dorsal  fin  is  marked  with  brown  for 
the  first  3-5  spines.  The  pectoral  has  a dusky  area  basally  and  the  pelvics  usually  have 
a few  melanophores  on  them,  mostly  basally. 

Females  are  similar  to  males  in  coloration,  but  the  head,  orbital  cirri  and  belly 
are  paler,  and  a higher  proportion  have  pale  background  color.  However,  dark  females 
and  light  males  do  occur.  In  life  the  impression  is  of  a dark  red  fish  with  the  light 
areas  light  olive  green.  The  dark  body  markings  are  vague,  and  all  the  fins  are  red. 

Ecology:  M.  sandae  occurs  along  near- vertical  rock  faces  or  coral  heads,  in  areas 
of  moderate  surge,  where  they  inhabit  mollusc  or  worm  tubes.  The  heads  protrude 
from  the  tubes,  and  the  fish  make  short  darts  forward,  apparently  snapping  at  plankton. 
Individuals  were  not  seen  to  emerge  completely  from  their  tubes,  but  may  come  out 


1978 


New  Chaenopsid  Blenny 


9 


for  one-half  the  body  length  or  more.  The  elongated  body  of  M.  sandae  allows  the 
head  to  be  thrust  well  away  from  the  tube  in  feeding,  with  the  tail  still  in  contact  with 
the  substrate.  Stephens  et  al.  (1966)  indicated  that  Acanthemblemaria  macrospilus , 
a relatively  short  bodied  species,  may  leave  its  tube  in  feeding. 

Observations  indicating  thatM.  sandae  feeds  on  plankton  were  confirmed  by  the 
examination  of  gut  contents  of  several  specimens.  Most  individuals  contained  frag- 
ments of  copepods  and  amphipods,  and  occasional  ostracods.  Individuals  from  LACM 
32551  contained  numbers  of  tiny  (.3-. 5 mm)  planktonic  stages  of  pelecypods  and 
gastropods. 

M.  sandae  has  been  taken  at  depths  ranging  from  1m  (3  ft)  to  almost  30  meters 
(100  ft).  The  shallowest  records  were  from  the  Gulf  of  Chiriqui,  Panama;  at  Isla  del 
Cano,  Costa  Rica;  individuals  were  not  seen  much  shallower  than  5 meters  (15  ft). 

There  was  a striking  disparity  in  the  numbers  of  males  and  females  in  the  Costa 
Rica  collections  SIO75-404  (capture  depth  5-10  m)  contained  149  males  and  76 
females.  LACM  32551  (capture  depth  20-30  m)  yielded  231  males  and  154  females. 
The  ratios  of  males  to  females  deviate  from  50:50  at  p < .01.  This  unbalanced  sex 
ratio  in  favor  of  males  is  difficult  to  explain.  It  almost  certainly  does  not  represent 
unisexual  patchiness.  The  areas  collected  were  large,  and  the  tube-dwelling  habit, 
small  size  and  relatively  poor  swimming  ability  of  the  species  makes  it  unlikely  that 
the  sexes  could  come  together  for  breeding  if  they  did  not  live  in  close  proximity.  It 
is  possible  that  collecting  bias  toward  the  more  obvious  specimens  could  be  involved, 
since  males  reach  a larger  size  than  females.  This  cannot  be  ruled  out,  but  it  is  not 
likely  that  the  great  disparity  in  sex  ratios  can  be  attributed  to  it. 

Otoliths  were  removed  from  three  specimens  before  preservation  (63.0,  66.0  and 
69.5  mm).  The  otoliths  were  cleared  in  anise  oil  and  examined  by  John  E.  McCosker. 
The  largest  and  smallest  specimens  had  three  hyaline  rings,  the  outer  at  the  margin, 
indicating  that  they  may  have  been  entering  their  fourth  year  of  growth.  The  66.0  mm 
individual  did  not  have  differentiated  areas  in  the  otolith. 

Range:  Thus  far  known  only  from  Isla  del  Cano,  Costa  Rica  and  the  Golfo  de 
Chiriqui,  Panama. 

Derivation  of  name:  Named  for  Sandra  McCosker,  who  participated  in  the  first 
collection  of  the  species. 


Material  Examined 

Holo type:  LACM  32551-34,  a 62.5  mm  6 from  an  isolated  rockpile  1.4  miles 
NW  of  Isla  del  Cano,  Costa  Rica.  Taken  with  rotenone  in  65' -75'  (21-24  m)  by 
William  Bussing,  John  McCosker,  James  McLean,  Manuel  Murillo,  Richard  Rosen- 
blatt and  Richard  Wheeler  on  16  March  1972. 

Paratypes:  Costa  Rica:  LACM  32551-35,  403  (18-70  mm),  bearing  the  same 
data  as  the  holotype;  USNM  214706,  10,  bearing  the  same  data  as  holotype;  SIO- 
75-404,  255  (21.5-62),  Isla  del  Cano.  Panama:  Golfo  de  Chiriqui;  SIO70-358,  14 
(22-65  mm),  Isla  Montuosa;  SIG71-51,  6 (30-60  mm),  SI071-37,  2 (42-46  mm),  Isla 
Uva;  SI071-54,  1 (38),  Isla  Canal  de  Afuera. 


PRO 


10 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  293 


Figure  3.  Cranial  skeleton,  Mccoskerichthys  sandae  (SIO70-358) 


1978 


New  Chaenopsid  Blenny 


11 


PTO 


M.  SANDAE 

Figure  4.  Neurocranium,  Mccoskerichthys  sandae  (SIO70-358) 


DORSAL  PTERYGIOPHORE 


12 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  293 


<i 

q: 


< 

< 


M.  SANDAE 

CAUDAL 

Caudal  skeleton,  Mccoskerichthys  sandae  (SIO70-358) 


1978 


New  Chaenopsid  Blenny 


13 


Figure  6.  Cranial  skeleton,  Protemblemaria  bicirris  (UCLA  65-71) 


14 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  293 


Figure  7.  Cranial  skeleton,  Ekemblemaria  myersi  (UCLA  53-86) 


1978 


New  Chaenopsid  Blenny 


15 


>- 


< 

o 

LU 

o 

z 

< 

o 


Figure  8.  Cranial  skeleton,  Coralliozetus  angelica  (right  side  damanged)  (UCLA  65-86) 


SHIV, 


16 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  293 


Figure  9.  Cranial  skeleton,  Acanthemblemaria  castroi  (UCLA  64-33) 


1978 


New  Chaenopsid  Blenny 


17 


P BICIRRIS 

Figure  10.  Neurocranium  of  Protemblemaria  bicirris  (UCLA  65-71) 


18 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  293 


E MYERSI 


Figure  1 1.  Neurocranium  of  Ekemblemaria  myersi  (UCLA  53-86) 


1978 


New  Chaenopsid  Blenny 


19 


C ANGEUCA 

Figure  12.  Neurocranium  of  Coralliozelus  angelica  (UCLA  65-86) 


20 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  293 


1978 


New  Chaenopsid  Blenny 


21 


CAUDALS 

Figure  14.  Comparative  caudal  skeletal  anatomy,  Protemblemaria  to  Acanthemble- 
maria  line. 


22 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  293 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The  Costa  Rica  collections  were  made  possible  by  the  Janss  Foundation;  the 
Panama  collections  were  made  from  the  R/V  ALPHA  HELIX. 

The  illustration  of  the  holotype  was  drawn  by  Brian  Burnette.  The  osteological 
drawings  are  by  Stephens  except  for  figure  6 by  Cassie  Cussik.  The  osteological  por- 
tion of  this  study  was  partially  supported  by  National  Science  Foundation  Grant 
GB27266  to  Stephens. 


A NOTE  ABOUT  FIGURES  AND  LEGENDS 

The  osteological  figures  do  not  attempt  to  illustrate  all  sensory  pores.  The  fol- 
lowing abbreviations  are  used  in  the  osteological  illustrations. 

AN,  Angular;  AR,  Articular;  BOC,  Basioccipital;  BR,  Branchiostegals;  BS, 
Basisphenoid;  CO,  Circumorbital;  D,  Dentary;  ECT,  Ectopterygoid;  EPO,  Epiotic; 
EXO,  Exoccipital;  F,  Frontal;  HYM,  Hyomandibular;  IC,  Intercalar;  IOP,  In- 
teropercular;  L.  Lachrymal;  LE,  Lateral  ethmoid;  MPT,  Metapterygoid;  MSPT, 
Mesopterygoid;  MX,  Maxilla;  N,  Nasal;  OP,  Opercular;  P,  Parietal;  PAL,  Pal- 
atine; PMX,  Premaxilla;  POP,  Preopercular;  PRO,  Prootic;  PS,  Parasphenoid; 
PTO,  Pterotic;  PTS,  Pterosphenoid;  Q,  Quadrate;  SOC,  Supraoccipital;  SOP, 
Subopercular;  SPO,  Sphenotic;  SYM,  Symplectic;  V,  Vomer. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bohlke,  J.  E.,  and  C.  H.  Robins.  1974.  Description  of  a new  genus  and  species  of  clinid  fish 
from  the  western  Caribbean,  with  comments  on  the  families  of  the  Blennioidea.  Proc.  Acad. 
Nat.  Sci.  Phil.  126,  1:1-8. 

Greenfield,  D.  W.  1972.  Notes  on  the  biology  of  the  arrow  blenny,  Lucayablennius  zingaro 
(Bohlke)  from  British  Honduras.  Copeia  1972,  (3):591-2. 

Hobson,  E.  S.  1968.  Predatory  behavior  of  some  shore  fishes  in  the  Gulf  of  California.  U.  S. 
Dept.  Interior,  Bureau  Sport  Fish,  and  Wildlife,  Res.  Report  73:1-92. 

Jollie,  M.  1962.  Chordate  Morphology.  Reinhold  Publ.  Corp.,  N.  Y.,  478  p. 

Robins,  C.  R.,  C.  Phillips  and  F.  Phillips.  1959.  Some  aspects  of  the  behavior  of  the  blen- 
nioid  fish  Chaenopsis  ocellata  Poey.  Zoologica,  44,  pt.  2 (5):77-83. 

Stephens,  J.  S.,  Jr.  1963.  A revised  classification  of  the  blennioid  fishes  of  the  American 
family  Chaenopsidae.  Univ.  Calif.  Publ.  Zook,  68:1-165. 

— . 1970.  Seven  new  chaenopsid  blennies  from  the  western  Atlantic.  Copeia  1970  (2): 

280-309. 

Stephens,  J.  S.,  Jr.,  E.  S.  Hobson  and  R.  K.  Johnson.  1966.  Notes  on  distribution,  behavior, 
and  morphological  variation  in  some  chaenopsid  fishes  from  the  tropical  eastern  Pacific, 
with  descriptions  of  two  new  species,  Acanthemblemaria  castroi  and  Coralliozetus  spring- 
eri.  Copeia  1966  (3):424-438. 

Wickler,  W.  1964.  Emblemaria  pandionis  (Blenniidae).  Kampfverhalten.  Encyclopedia  Ci- 
nematographica  E 5171,  1963.  3 p. 

Accepted  for  publication  June  30,  1976. 


ZL%&9> 


NUMBER  294 
MAY  15,  1978 


A NEW  SPECIES  OF  CHIROPTEROTRITON  (AMPHIBIA:  CAUDATA) 
FROM  BAJA  VERAPAZ,  GUATEMALA,  WITH  COMMENTS  ON 
RELATIONSHIPS  AMONG  CENTRAL  AMERICAN 
MEMBERS  OF  THE  GENUS 


By  James  F.  Lynch  and  David  B.  Wake 


NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCENCC 


■ 


Published  by  the  NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM 
OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007 


SERIAL  PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE 
NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 


Prior  to  November  30,  1973,  publications  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  have  appeared 
under  various  formats — Leaflet  Series,  Museum  Graphic,  Science  Series,  Study  Guides,  Con- 
tributions in  Science,  Contributions  in  History,  Science  Bulletins,  unnumbered  catalogs  of 
exhibitions,  and  other  miscellaneous  publications.  The  Museum  now  publishes  the  following 
serials  at  irregular  intervals  as  CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE,  HISTORY  BULLETINS, 
SCIENCE  BULLETINS,  EDUCATION  SERIES,  HISTORY  SERIES,  and  SCIENCE  SE- 
RIES. The  Contributions  are  short  papers  of  octavo  size.  The  Bulletins  are  longer,  compre- 
hensive papers  of  quarto  size.  The  Series  are  papers  of  variable  lengths  of  quarto  or  larger 
size.  Papers  in  each  serial  are  numbered  separately  and  consecutively. 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  contain  articles  in  the  earth  and  life  sciences,  presenting 
results  of  original  research.  Emphasis  is  intended  principally  for  papers  allied  to  biosystematic 
research,  but  other  subjects  and  review-oriented  ones  will  be  considered.  Number  1 was  issued 
on  January  23,  1957.  Contributions  must  be  not  less  than  8 nor  exceed  72  printed  pages. 

INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  AUTHORS 

Acceptance  of  manuscripts  will  be  determined  by  the  significance  of  new  information.  Priority 
will  be  given  to  manuscripts  by  staff  members.  All  manuscripts  must  be  recommended  by  the 
curator  in  charge  of  each  discipline  or  by  the  Editorial  Board.  Manuscripts  must  conform  to 
the  specifications  listed  below.  They  will  be  examined  for  suitability  by  the  Editorial  Board 
and  will  include  review  by  specialists  outside  the  Museum. 

Authors  must  adhere  to  the  International  Code  of  Nomenclature  of  Bacteria  and  Viruses, 
International  Code  of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  and  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature, including  their  respective  recommendations.  Further,  authors  proposing  new  taxa  in 
a CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  must  indicate  that  all  primary  types  have  been  deposited 
in  an  appropriate  scientific  institution  of  their  choice  and  must  cite  that  institution  by  name. 

MANUSCRIPT  FORM. — (1)  In  preparation  of  copy  follow  the  1972  CBE  Style  Manual, 
third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapters  5 and  6.  (2)  Footnotes  should  be  avoided;  acknowledgments 
as  footnotes  will  not  be  accepted.  (3)  An  informative  abstract  must  be  included  for  all  papers. 
(4)  A Spanish  summary  is  required  for  all  manuscripts  dealing  with  Latin  American  subjects. 
Summaries  in  other  languages  are  not  required  but  are  strongly  recommended.  (5)  A differ- 
ential diagnosis  must  accompany  any  newly  proposed  taxon.  (6)  Submit  two  copies  of  manu- 
script. 

ILLUSTRATIONS. — All  illustrations,  including  maps  and  photographs,  will  be  referred  to 
as  figures.  All  illustrations  should  be  of  sufficient  clarity  and  in  proper  proportions  for  reduc- 
tion to  CONTRIBUTIONS  page  size.  In  preparing  illustrations  and  legends  consult  the  1972 
CBE  Style  Manual,  third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapter  5.  Submit  only  illustrations  made  with 
permanent  ink  and  glossy  photographic  prints  of  good  contrast.  Submit  duplicate  copies  of 
all  illustrations.  Original  illustrations  will  be  returned  after  the  manuscript  has  been  published. 

PROOF. — Authors  will  be  sent  galley  proofs  which  should  be  corrected  and  returned  promptly. 
No  changes  or  alterations,  other  than  typesetting  corrections,  will  be  allowed  unless  paid  by 
author.  Requests  for  reprints  may  be  placed  through  the  Editor. 

R.  Edward  Ostermeyer 
Editor 


All  communications  concerning  manuscripts  and  exchange  of  or  purchase  of  publications 
should  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Museum  Publications,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 

Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America  by  Chapman’s  Phototypesetting  on  70#  Patina  Book 


A NEW  SPECIES  OF  CHIROPTEROTRITON  (AMPHIBIA:  CAUDATA)  FROM 
BAJA  VERAPAZ,  GUATEMALA,  WITH  COMMENTS  ON  RELATIONSHIPS 
AMONG  CENTRAL  AMERICAN  MEMBERS  OF  THE  GENUS1 

By  James  F.  Lynch2  and  David  B.  Wake3 


Abstract:  Chiropterotriton  veraepacis,  a diminutive  species  of  plethodontid 
salamander  with  very  large  nostrils,  is  described.  It  occurs  inside  bromeliads  in  an 
area  of  montane  cloud  forest  south  of  Purulha,  Baja  Verapaz,  Guatemala,  and  in 
nearby  areas  of  Alta  Verapaz,  Guatemala.  In  most  structural  features  C.  veraepacis 
resembles  C.  nasalis  of  northeastern  Honduras,  a shorter  tailed,  wider  headed  species 
with  larger  nostrils.  The  new  species  is  similar  to  species  of  the  bromeliacia  group 
from  Guatemala  and  Chiapas  in  ecology  and  in  many  structural  features  but  differs 
from  them  in  osteology.  Although  C.  nasalis  and  C.  veraepacis  are  very  distinct  from 
the  Costa  Rican  species  C.  picadoi  in  most  morphological  and  ecological  features, 
they  resemble  that  species  in  osteology.  Some  additional  information  is  presented 
concerning  the  poorly  known  species  C.  richardi  (Costa  Rica)  andC.  barbouri  (Hon- 
duras), and  possible  relationships  among  all  of  these  species  are  discussed. 


INTRODUCTION 

In  a recent  paper  (Lynch  and  Wake  1975)  we  assigned  two  new  Guatemalan 
species  of  Chiropterotriton  (C.  cuchumatanus  and  C.  rabbi ) as  well  as  three  previ- 
ously known  Chiapan  and  Guatemalan  forms  (C.  megarhinus,  C.  xolocalcae,  and  C. 
bromeliacia ) to  the  bromeliacia  species  group.  In  that  paper  we  noted  the  importance 
of  Nuclear  Central  America  as  an  evolutionary  center  for  Chiropterotriton  and  other 
tropical  plethodontid  genera  (see  also,  Wake  and  Lynch  1976),  and  remarked  that 
other  undescribed  Chiropterotriton  existed  in  the  area. 

This  paper  reports  the  discovery  of  a new  species  of  Chiropterotriton  from  the 
Department  of  Baja  Verapaz,  in  east-central  Guatemala.  This  form  was  first  encoun- 
tered in  the  spring  of  1973  by  Thomas  Uzzell,  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences,  Phil- 
adelphia (ANSP),  who  collected  four  individuals  in  an  area  of  montane  cloud  forest 
a few  kilometers  south  of  the  village  of  Purulha.  The  locality  is  some  130  km  east 
of  the  closest  populations  of  bromeliacia- group  Chiropterotriton  in  Huehuetenango, 
Guatemala,  and  is  over  100  km  west  of  the  nearest  known  localities  for  C.  nasalis 


Review  Committee  for  this  Contribution 
Robert  L.  Bezy 
Arden  H.  Brame,  Jr. 

Richard  Highton 
John  W.  Wright 

2Chesapeake  Bay  Center  for  Environmental  Studies,  Smithsonian  Institution,  Route  4,  Box  622, 
Edge  water,  Maryland  21037. 

3Research  Associate  in  Herpetology,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County,  900  Ex- 
position Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007,  and  Museum  of  Vertebrate  Zoology,  2593 
Life  Sciences  Building,  University  of  California,  Berkeley,  California  94720. 


2 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  294 


in  Honduras.  In  1972  the  present  authors  had  collected  two  species  of  Bolitoglossa 
at  the  same  locality  where  Uzzell  found  Chiropterotriton,  but  we  did  not  encounter 
salamanders  of  the  latter  genus  on  that  visit,  nor  on  a later  trip  (August,  1973). 
Because  Uzzell’ s specimens  clearly  represented  an  undescribed  member  of  the  genus, 
we  returned  to  the  Purulha  area  a third  time  in  November,  1974,  in  hopes  of  securing 
additional  material.  On  this  occasion  we  collected  a series  of  eleven  Chiropterotriton . 
We  name  this  species  for  its  provenance,  a beautiful  land  of  true  peace: 

Chiropterotriton  veraepacis  new  species 
Figure  1 

Holotype:  MVZ  1 12499.  An  adult  male  from  4.2  km  (by  road)  S Purulha,  Baja 
Verapaz,  Guatemala,  collected  by  James  F.  Lynch,  David  B.  Wake,  and  Theodore 
J.  Papenfuss,  14  November  1974.  The  holotype  is  one  of  a series  taken  at  elevations 
between  1740  and  1780  meters. 

Paratypes:  MVZ  112495-98  (4  specimens),  LACM  123803  same  data  as  holo- 
type. MVZ  112490-112494  (5  specimens)  collected  at  the  type  locality  13  November 
1974.  ANSP  28194-28197  (4  specimens)  collected  at  the  type  locality  in  early  1973 
by  Thomas  M.  Uzzell,  Jr. 

Diagnosis:  Compared  to  other  Central  American  Chiropterotriton,  C.  veraepacis 
is  a rather  small  species,  with  an  unusually  long  tail  and  narrow  head.  Eight  sexually 
mature  individuals  of  both  sexes  measure  26.1-31.2  mm  (mean  28.6  mm)  SL4.  The 
tail  is  1.26-1.43  times  SL  in  undamaged  adult  males,  whereas  head  width  is  0.13- 
0.14  times  SL.  Maxillary  teeth  are  abundant  (range  45-57;  mean  49.0  for  adults), 
vomerine  teeth  are  few  (range  8-11;  mean  9.6  for  adults),  and  the  nostrils  are  notably 
enlarged  (diameter  equals  0.4-0. 6 mm  in  adults).  C.  veraepacis  is  distinguished  from 
C.  nasalis  by  longer  tail,  much  narrower  head,  smaller  feet,  and  somewhat  smaller 
nostril5;  fromC.  picadoi  by  somewhat  longer  tail,  narrower  head,  much  longer  limbs, 
much  larger  feet,  more  maxillary  teeth,  and  much  larger  nostrils;  from  C.  bromeliacia 
by  somewhat  smaller  average  size,  narrower  head,  longer  tail,  and  many  more  max- 
illary teeth;  from  C.  cuchumatanus  by  much  longer  tail,  narrower  head,  more  max- 
illary teeth,  and  somewhat  fewer  vomerine  teeth;  from  C.  rabbi  by  smaller  average 
size,  longer  tail,  much  narrower  head,  and  smaller  nostrils;  from  C.  xolocalcae  by 
much  longer  tail,  much  narrower  head,  more  vomerine  teeth,  and  much  larger  nostrils; 
fromC.  megarhinus  by  much  longer  tail,  much  narrower  head,  and  somewhat  smaller 
nostrils.  Other  species  of  Chiropterotriton  from  Central  America  have  a light  inter- 


4SL  = standard  length,  here  defined  as  the  distance  from  the  snout  to  the  posterior  angle  of  the 
vent. 

5 Statements  concerning  proportional  distinctions  between  species  are  based  on  comparisons  of 
adult  males  at  a common  projected  SL  (30  mm).  All  character  differences  noted  in  the  diagnoses 
are  significant  at  the  0.05  level  or  above. 


1978 


A new  Guatemalan  Chiropterotriton  species 


3 


c. 


Figure  1.  Heads  of  adult 
Chiropterotriton  veraepacis, 


males  of  species  of  Chiropterotriton,  drawn  to  same  scale,  (a) 
(b)  Chiropterotriton  bromeliacia,  (c)  Chiropterotriton  picadoi. 


4 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  294 


orbital  pigment  band,  at  least  in  some  specimens,  but  we  have  not  seen  any  indication 
of  this  feature  in  C.  veraepacis . Both  C.  veraepacis  and  C.  nasalis  have  nostrils  that 
are  clearly  visible  by  examination  of  the  dorsal  surface  of  the  head  from  directly  above 
the  specimen.  In  C.  picadoi,  C.  richardi  and  members  of  the  bromeliacia  group  the 
nostrils  are  only  slightly,  or  not  at  all,  visible  in  dorsal  view. 

Description:  To  judge  from  the  limited  sample,  C.  veraepacis  is  a relatively  small 
member  of  the  genus,  the  largest  of  fifteen  specimens  measuring  31.2  SL.  The  species 
has  the  longest  relative  tail  length  and  the  narrowest  relative  head  width  of  any  of  the 
seven  other  northern  Central  American  Chiropterotriton  for  which  we  have  data  (the 
eighth  known  species  from  the  region,  the  rarely  collected  C.  barbouri  of  Honduras, 
is  not  considered  here).  The  number  of  maxillary  teeth  increases  dramatically  with 
SL  (r  = 0.82;  P<  0.01),  but  no  size  related  increase  in  vomerine  tooth  count  is  evident 
(r  = 0.24;  P > 0.1).  The  nostrils  are  moderately  large  in  juveniles  and  subadults. 
Nostrils  increase  in  size  in  adults,  contrary  to  what  is  seen  inC.  xolocalcae,  C.  rabbi, 
and  C.  picadoi.  The  only  adult  female  in  the  type  series  (MVZ  1 12497)  has  a shorter 
tail  and  more  maxillary  teeth  than  have  males  of  equivalent  SL.  Adult  males  possess 
conspicuous  oval- shaped  mental  hedonic  glands. 

Measurements  of  the  holotype  (in  mm):  Head  width  3.9;  snout  to  gular  fold  (head 
length)  5.7;  head  depth  at  posterior  angle  of  jaw  2.7;  eyelid  length  2.0;  eyelid  width 
1.0;  anterior  rim  of  orbit  to  snout  1.8;  horizontal  orbit  diameter  1.5;  interorbital  dis- 
tance 2.3;  distance  between  vomerine  teeth  and  parasphenoid  tooth  patch  0.5;  snout 
to  fore  limb  7.9;  distance  separating  internal  nares  0.8;  distance  separating  external 
nares  0.8;  snout  projection  beyond  mandible  0.3;  snout  to  posterior  angle  of  vent  (SL) 
28.2;  snout  to  anterior  angle  of  vent  25.7;  axilla  to  groin  14.3;  tail  length  39.8;  tail 
width  at  base  2.4;  tail  depth  at  base  2.6;  fore  limb  length  6.7;  hind  limb  length  7.6; 
width  of  right  hand  1.9;  width  of  right  foot  2.3. 

Coloration  (in  life):  The  dorsum  of  the  holotype  is  dark  vinaceous  brown.  A red- 
orange  patch  of  pigment  is  present  in  the  sacral  region,  but  in  contrast  to  the  situation 
seen  in  most  Central  American  Chiropterotriton,  there  is  no  interorbital  bar  of  light 
pigment.  A pair  of  obscure,  red-brown  patches  of  color  are  present  in  the  otic  region. 
There  is  a hint  of  a jagged-edged  dorsal  stripe  on  the  tail.  The  dense  dorsal  melanin 
network  is  lighter  laterally.  A few  small  white  iridophores  are  present  at  the  side  of 
the  head  and  trunk.  The  limb  bases  are  light  pink.  The  venter  is  slate  gray,  with  the 
tail  somewhat  darker  than  the  belly  and  chin.  Small  white  iridophores  are  scattered 
on  the  chin,  with  fewer  on  the  belly,  and  none  on  the  underside  of  the  tail.  The  animal 
is  fundamentally  very  dark,  with  other  pigments  (save  at  the  tail  base)  becoming  ev- 
ident only  on  close  examination. 

The  paratypes  generally  resemble  the  holotype  in  coloration.  All  fourteen  para- 
types  are  dark  brown  to  black  dorsally,  all  possess  a light  sacral  patch  (red,  red-brown, 
orange,  or  obscure  red-orange),  and  all  lack  an  interorbital  bar  of  light  pigment.  Ven- 
tral coloration  shows  more  variation,  ranging  from  medium  gray  to  nearly  black. 
Contrast  between  the  chin  and  the  belly  is  greatest  in  those  individuals  with  darker 
bellies.  The  number  of  ventral  white  iridophores  ranges  from  none  to  moderately 
abundant,  especially  in  the  gular  region.  Most  individuals  show  at  least  a few  white 


A new  Guatemalan  Chiropterotriton  species 


5 


1978 


flecks  along  the  side  of  the  head.  In  most  individuals  there  is  an  obscure,  irregularly 
bordered  caudal  stripe,  and  in  some  it  is  faintly  visible  on  the  back  as  well. 

Habitat:  The  type  series  was  collected  in  an  exceptionally  humid  cloud  forest 
which  extends  for  several  kilometers  to  the  west  and  east  of  the  type  locality  along 
the  north-facing  slopes  of  the  Sierra  de  Chuacus.  According  to  the  vegetational  clas- 
sification of  Holdridge  (1967),  the  type  locality  supports  lower  montane  wet  evergreen 
forest  (see  also  Savage,  1975).  Large  bromeliads,  orchids,  and  other  epiphytes  are 
conspicuously  abundant,  as  are  the  tree  ferns  that  are  typical  of  cloud  forests  elsewhere 
in  Guatemala.  Low  palms  are  common  in  the  understory  of  the  forest.  There  are  no 
relevant  weather  data  for  nearby  sites,  but  to  judge  from  the  aspect  of  the  vegetation 
and  from  the  generalized  precipitation  map  published  by  the  Instituto  Geografico 
Nacional  of  Guatemala  (1966),  annual  rainfall  probably  exceeds  3000  mm.  The  local 
topography  is  extremely  rugged,  and  much  of  the  area  is  inaccessible  to  collecting 
due  to  the  extreme  steepness  of  slope. 

Ten  of  the  eleven  Chiropterotriton  collected  by  the  present  authors  were  found 
inside  arboreal  bromeliads  ( Tillandsia  and  Catopsis  spp)  during  daylight  hours.  The 
eleventh  specimen  was  encountered  after  dark  on  the  upper  surface  of  a palm  leaf 
approximately  1 m above  the  ground.  Uzzell  obtained  the  four  ANSP  paratypes  and 
an  additional  six  specimens  (ANSP  2885-90,  too  poorly  preserved  to  measure)  from 
large  bromeliads,  2-8  feet  off  the  ground. 

Other  arboreal  amphibians  which  occur  at  the  type  locality  of  C.  veraepacis  in- 
clude two  species  of  Bolitoglossa  (a  population  tentatively  assigned  to  B.  helmrichi 
and  a less  common,  undescribed  all-black  species),  Hyla  bromeliacia,  Plectrohyla 
quecchi,  and  a large,  fringe-limbed  hylid  similar  to  Hyla  miliaria.  All  of  the  foregoing 
species  were  found  in  arboreal  bromeliads,  but  some  occur  under  the  loose  bark  of 
downed  logs  as  well.  Terrestrial  amphibians  and  reptiles  collected  in  the  vicinity  of 
the  type  locality  include  Eleutherodactylus  brocchi,  E.  rugulosus,  Anolis  cobanensis, 
A.  crassulus,  Barisia  moreleti,  Sceloporus  taeniocnemis , and  Thamnophis  cyrtopsis. 

The  cloud  forest  inhabited  by  C.  veraepacis  became  easily  accessible  in  the  sum- 
mer of  1972  upon  completion  of  an  all-weather  road  through  the  mountains  of  Baja 
Verapaz  and  Alta  Verapaz.  This  previously  undisturbed  tract  of  forest  is  rapidly  being 
destroyed  by  lumbering  and  agricultural  activities,  and  the  prospects  of  continued 
survival  of  C.  veraepacis  and  other  as  yet  undescribed  endemic  amphibians  are  bleak. 

Range:  Known  only  from  the  type  locality  and  a nearby  locality  in  Alta  Verapaz, 
Guatemala.  To  be  sought  in  montane  cloud  forest  along  the  humid,  north-facing  slopes 
in  the  Chuacus-Minas  mountain  ranges  of  Baja  Verapaz  and  Alta  Verapaz.  Thomas 
Uzzell  collected  two  specimens  of  Chiropterotriton  in  a bromeliad  30  feet  above  the 
ground  on  the  top  of  a ridge  above  Finca  Volcan,  Alta  Verapaz  (ANSP  28198-28199). 
Stuart  (1948)  reports  an  altitude  of  925  meters  for  the  finca,  and  Uzzell’ s collecting 
site  is  somewhat  higher.  Although  these  specimens  are  poorly  preserved  and  cannot 
be  measured,  we  assign  them  to  C.  veraepacis  on  the  basis  of  their  general  form, 
large  nostrils,  light  pigment  spots  at  the  base  of  the  tail  and  absence  of  an  interorbital 
bar  of  pigment.  C.  veraepacis  is  the  first  species  of  salamander  to  be  reported  from 
Baja  Verapaz. 


6 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  294 


Comparative  Osteology 

In  our  previous  paper  (Lynch  and  Wake  1975)  we  reviewed  the  osteological  char- 
acters of  the  five  species  that  comprise  the  C.  bromeliacia  group.  An  additional  five 
species  of  Chiropterotriton  occur  south  and  east  of  the  Isthmus  of  Tehuantepec:  C. 
veraepacis  of  Guatemala,  C.  nasalis  and  C.  barbouri  of  Honduras,  and  C.  picadoi 
and  C.  richardi  of  Costa  Rica  (Wake  and  Lynch  1976).  These  ten  species  constitute 
Chiropterotriton-beta. 

In  addition  to  the  skeletal  material  for  the  bromeliacia  group  that  was  available 
for  our  previous  study,  we  have  examined  a second  specimen  of  C.  cuchumatamus . 
A partial  skeleton  of  the  rare  C.  richardi  provided  limited  information  (Wake  1966), 
and  we  have  had  one  hand  and  one  foot  of  an  additional  specimen  (MVZ  99516).  We 
have  examined  one  cleared  and  stained  C.  veraepacis,  two  C.  nasalis,  five  C.  picadoi, 
and  one  specimen  (ANSP  28200)  of  a population  from  the  mountains  south  of  Pueblo 
Viejo,  Depto.  Yoro,  Honduras,  that  is  tentatively  assigned  to  C.  barbouri. 

C.  veraepacis  differs  sharply  from  all  members  of  the  C.  bromeliacia  group  in 
having  prefrontal  bones,  in  having  frontal  processes  of  the  premaxillary  bone  which 
arise  separately  and  then  fuse,  separating  again  near  their  tips  (Fig.  2),  in  having  the 


Figure  2.  Three-quarter,  anterolateral  view  of  the  nasal  capsule  region  of  three  species  of 
Chiropterotriton,  illustrating  important  features.  Heavy  lines,  nasal  bone;  fine  lines,  intemasal 
fontanelle;  stipple,  cartilaginous  nasal  capsule;  blackened  area,  opening  in  nasal  capsule  for 
external  naris.  Arrows  point  to  area  through  which  nasolacrimal  duct  passes  ventrally  into  the 
nasal  capsule. 


1978 


A new  Guatemalan  Chiropterotriton  species 


7 


fourth  and  fifth  distal  tarsals  fused,  and  in  having  reduced  numbers  of  carpal  elements, 
the  result  of  ulnare-intermedium  fusions  (Fig.  3).  In  these  characters  it  resembles  both 
C.  nasalis  and  C.  picadoi  (Wake  1966,  reported  prefrontals  to  be  present  or  absent 
inC.  abscondens  = C.  picadoi.  This  statement  is  based  on  one  apparently  pathological 
specimen  that  has  heavy  ossification  and  in  which  the  prefrontals  and  nasals  are  fused. 
In  the  other  four  individuals  examined  the  situation  illustrated  in  figure  2 is  seen.). 
C.  veraepacis,  C.  nasalis,  andC.  picadoi  all  lack  septomaxillary  bones  and  columellar 
processes  of  the  opercular  apparatus,  which  are  present  in  some  of  the  bromeliacia 
group.  The  new  specimen  of  C.  cuchumatamus  has  a pair  of  distinct  septomaxillary 
bones,  so  the  elements  have  now  been  found  in  all  members  of  the  bromeliacia  group 
except  C.  xolocalcae. 

In  most  osteological  features  C.  nasalis  and  C.  veraepacis  are  especially  similar. 
They  differ  from  all  members  of  the  bromeliacia  group  in  a number  of  derived  char- 
acters (the  erratically  structured,  reduced  nasal  bones,  the  fused  frontal  processes  of 
the  premaxillary,  and  the  carpal  and  tarsal  fusions).  The  members  of  the  bromeliacia 
group  differ  from  these  two  species  in  one  derived  character,  loss  of  the  prefrontal 
bones.  Additional  derived  features  of  C.  nasalis  and  C.  veraepacis  distinguish  them 
from  some  to  most  members  of  the  bromeliacia  group;  these  include  loss  of  the  sep- 
tomaxillary bones  and  the  preorbital  processes  of  the  vomers.  C.  nasalis  has  only  a 
rudimentary  tibial  spur,  while  the  process  is  absent  in  the  bromeliacia  group.  C.  ver- 
aepacis has  a tibial  spur. 

The  nasal  capsules  of  C.  nasalis  and  C.  veraepacis  have  an  orientation  that  dis- 
tinguishes them  from  the  members  of  the  bromeliacia  group  and  the  other  species 
discussed  here.  The  external  nares  are  shifted  so  as  to  have  a more  dorsal  orientation 
than  the  nares  of  most  species,  which  are  typically  directed  anterolaterally  in  a nearly 
vertical  plane. 

C.  richardi  andC.  barbouri  are  the  least  well  known  species  of  Chiropterotriton  - 
beta,  but  we  have  some  useful  information.  Both  species  have  prefrontal  bones, 
preorbital  processes  of  the  vomers,  and  tibial  spurs,  but  lack  septomaxillaries  and 
columellar  processes  of  the  operculum.  The  ulnare  and  tibiale  are  fused  in  both,  as 
are  distal  tarsals  four  and  five.  Frontal  processes  of  the  premaxillary  are  fused  for  a 
short  distance  above  their  origin  in  C.  barbouri  but  not  in  C.  richardi. 

In  the  bromeliacia  group  the  nasals  are  the  main  bony  link  between  the  frontals 
and  the  maxillaries,  but  in  C.  nasalis,  C.  veraepacis  and  C.  barbouri  the  prefrontals 
provide  that  link.  The  nasals  are  reduced  in  the  first  two  species.  These  features  sug- 
gest that  enlarged  nostrils  have  evolved  in  different  ways  in  the  two  species  assem- 
blages, and  that  no  constant  set  of  characters  accompanies  nostril  enlargement.  Some 
accommodation  for  the  enlarged  nostrils  is  required  in  the  facial  region  of  the  skull, 
but  it  may  be  the  result,  (a)  of  prefrontal  loss  and  movement  of  nasals  into  the  “pre- 
frontal zone”,  (b)  of  nasal  reduction  and  increased  prefrontal  importance,  (c)  or  of 
both  nasal  and  prefrontal  reduction,  but  with  both  retaining  important  connecting  func- 
tions in  the  facial  part  of  the  skull  (as  occurs  in  C.  richardi). 

Both  C.  veraepacis  and  C.  nasalis  differ  from  C.  picadoi  and  C.  richardi  in 
lacking  preorbital  processes  on  the  vomer  and  in  having  tear-drop  shaped  prefrontals 
that  are  pierced  for  passage  of  the  nasolacrimal  ducts  (Fig.  2).  C.  barbouri  has  preor- 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  294 


b. 


Figure  3.  Hands  and  feet  of  species  of  Chiropterotriton,  drawn  to  same  scale  from  cleared  and 
stained  specimens  with  aid  of  microprojector.  Cartilage  stippled,  (a)  Left  hand  and  (b)  foot  of 
C.  veraepacis;  (c)  foot  of  C.  barbouri;  (d)  foot  of  C.  nasalis;  (e)  hand,  and  (f)  foot  of  C. 
richardi;  (g)  foot  of  C.  picadoi;  (h)  foot  of  C.  bromeliacia. 


1978 


A new  Guatemalan  Chiropterotriton  species 


9 


bital  processes,  but  also  has  prefrontals  very  similar  to  those  of  C.  veraepacis.  The 
nasal  bones  of  C.  veraepacis  and  C.  nasalis  are  very  reduced  in  size  and  irregular  in 
shape;  the  bones  have  weak  or  no  articulations.  Nasals  are  large,  regular  in  form,  and 
well  articulated  in  C.  picadoi  and  C.  barbouri.  The  small  nostriled  C.  picadoi  has  a 
very  solid,  strongly  articulated  skull,  while  the  relatively  large  nostriled  C.  richardi 
and  the  small  nostriled  C.  barbouri  have  the  more  restricted  articulation  typical  of 
Guatemalan,  Honduran,  and  Chiapan  species  of  Chiropterotriton.  In  C.  richardi  the 
nasals  are  rather  small,  but  less  reduced  than  in  C.  veraepacis  and  C.  nasalis. 

If  the  bromeliacia  group  is  accepted  as  a monophyletic  assemblage,  the  osteo- 
logical  data  are  consistent  with  a reasonably  clear  cladistic  network  for  the  eight  spe- 
cies we  are  able  to  consider  in  detail  (Fig.  4).  The  characters  used  are  as  follows 
(upper  case  letters  indicate  primitive  states,  lower  case  derived  state;  see  Wake  1966, 
for  detailed  analysis  of  characters): 

A.  Prefrontal  and  nasal  form  the  bony  connecting  link  between  the  frontal  or  the 
center  of  the  skull  and  the  maxillary;  the  nasolacrimal  duct  passes  between  the 
prefrontal  and  the  nasal,  a.  No  prefrontal  bone;  only  the  nasal  bone  is  involved 
in  the  link,  and  the  nasolacrimal  duct  passes  behind  it.  a'.  Nasal  bone  reduced  in 
size  and  does  not  span  frontal  and  maxillary;  only  prefrontal  involved  in  link; 
nasolacrimal  duct  pierces  expanded  ventrolateral  part  of  prefrontal.  States  a and 
a ' represent  independent  derivations  from  A in  very  different  directions. 

B.  Septomaxillary  present,  b.  Septomaxillary  absent. 

C.  Frontal  processes  of  premaxillary  arise  separately  and  do  not  fuse.  c.  Pro- 
cesses fused  at  base  but  separate  distally. 

D.  Distal  tarsals  4 and  5 discrete,  d.  Distal  tarsals  4 and  5 fused. 

E.  Vomer  has  a preorbital  process,  e.  No  process. 

F.  Intermedium  and  ulnare  discrete  in  carpus,  f.  Intermedium  and  ulnare  fused. 


./  / / 

$ aO 


<r  $ 

/ / / / 


/ y y 


H h 


A,  E 


b,G  B,g 


a,e 


A,  b,c  ,d,f  ,g  , H a , B,C , D,  F,G  , h 


Chiropterotriton  ft 

Figure  4.  Cladogram  of  eight  species  of  Chiropterotriton- beta,  constructed  by  use  of  osteo- 
logical  characters.  The  character  states  indicated  apply  to  all  species  along  the  branch  unless 
modified  states  are  indicated  at  a higher  level  in  the  dendrogram.  See  text  for  explanation. 


10 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  294 


G.  Columellar  process  of  operculum  present,  g.  Process  absent. 

H.  Tibial  spur  present,  h.  No  tibial  spur. 

The  first  branching  separates  the  bromeliacia  group  from  all  other  species.  The 
second  branching  separates  C.  picadoi  from  C.  veraepacis  and  C.  nasalis  on  the  basis 
of  loss  of  the  preorbital  process  of  the  vomer  and  piercing  of  the  prefrontals  in  the 
latter  two  species.  On  osteological  grounds  C.  nasalis  and  C.  veraepacis  are  closest 
to  C.  barbouri,  and  they  are  very  distinct  from  the  species  of  the  bromeliacia  group. 
The  osteological  formulas  for  the  poorly  known  species  are,  for  C.  barbouri:  A (but 
the  nasolacrimal  duct  pierces  the  prefrontal  as  in  a'),  b,  c (but  the  amount  of  fusion 
is  slight),  d,  E,  f,  g,  H;  for  C.  richardi:  A,  b,  C,  d,  E,  f,  g,  H.  If  placed  on  the 
cladogram  C.  richardi  would  be  on  a branch  derived  from  (but  not  a sister  group  of) 
the  main  branch  leading  toC.  picadoi,  C.  nasalis,  andC.  veraepacis.  A branch  lead- 
ing to  C.  barbouri  would  be  a more  primitive,  non-sister  group  of  the  C.  vera- 
epacis-C.  nasalis  line.  In  osteological  formulae,  barbouri  is  identical  toC.  picadoi, 
but  when  one  takes  into  account  additional  features,  especially  the  shape  of  bones 
such  as  the  prefrontal  and  the  route  of  the  nasolacrimal  duct,  it  seems  clear  that  it  is 
more  similar  to  its  more  osteologically  derived  neighbors  than  to  C.  picadoi. 

The  cladogram  contains  four  convergences.  We  have  rather  arbitrarily  coded  C. 
nasalis  as  h,  even  though  a rudimentary  tibial  spur  might  be  present.  We  have  never 
seen  tibial  spur  rudiments  in  the  bromeliacia  group,  but  with  larger  samples  it  would 
not  be  surprising  to  find  an  occasional  rudiment.  Septomaxillaries  have  not  been  ob- 
served in  C.  xolocalcae,  but  experience  has  shown  that  these  bones  are  found  in  at 
least  a small  percentage  of  other  members  of  the  group,  and  the  absence  here  may 
reflect  the  small  sample  size.  It  is  likely  that  the  remaining  two  convergences  (e  and 
g)  are  real. 

In  addition  to  the  easily  coded  characters  which  have  been  used  above,  the  gen- 
eral arrangement  and  shape  of  the  bones  ofC.  nasalis,  C.  veraepacis  andC.  barbouri 
are  similar,  and  in  some  details  of  foot  structure  (the  shape  of  the  terminal  phalanges, 
fig.  3)  these  species,  C.  picadoi  and  C.  richardi  are  similar  and  differ  from  all  mem- 
bers of  the  bromeliacia  group. 

Morphometric  Analysis 
Methods 

Lynch  and  Wake  (1975)  used  a number  of  analytical  approaches  in  comparing 
the  five  species  of  the  Chiropterotriton  bromeliacia  group.  The  number  of  specimens 
of  C.  veraepacis,  while  small,  is  sufficient  for  some  of  the  same  kinds  of  quantitative 
comparisons.  Specifically,  we  have  undertaken  linear  regression  analysis  of  single 
characters  as  they  vary  with  SL,  and  multiple  discriminant  analysis  of  all  characters 
simultaneously  in  an  attempt  to  clarify  the  phenetic  and  phyletic  relationships  among 
eight  of  the  ten  Central  American  species  of  Chiropterotriton  (C.  bromeliacia,  C. 
cuchumatanus,  C.  megarhinus,  C.  nasalis,  C.  picadoi,  C.  rabbi,  C.  veraepacis,  C. 
xolocalcae ).  C.  barbouri,  a poorly  known  species  from  western  Honduras,  and  C. 
richardi,  a poorly  known  Costa  Rican  form,  have  been  omitted  due  to  lack  of  suf- 
ficient comparative  material.  The  reader  is  referred  to  our  earlier  paper  for  detailed 


1978 


A new  Guatemalan  Chiropterotriton  species 


11 


description  of  statistical  methodology  and  for  discussion  of  the  choice  and  scaling  of 
individual  characters. 

Analysis  of  individual  characters : Eight  characters  are  considered:  standard 
length  (SL),  head  width  (HW),  nostril  diameter  (ND),  combined  length  of  hind  limb 
and  fore  limb  (CL),  foot  width  (FW),  tail  length  (TL),  number  of  maxillary  teeth 
(MT),  and  number  of  vomerine  teeth  (VT).  As  described  in  detail  in  Lynch  and  Wake 
(1975),  we  have  used  linear  regression  techniques  to  project  means  and  95  percent 
confidence  limits  for  characters  2-8  to  a common  value  of  SL  = 30  mm.  To  eliminate 
the  confusing  effects  of  secondary  sexual  dimorphism  and  possibly  nonlinear  rates  of 
character  change  across  very  wide  ranges  of  SL,  only  post-juvenile  males  (SL  greater 
than  24  mm)  are  included  in  the  regression  analysis. 

Multivariate  analysis  of  characters:  The  same  eight  morphological  characters 
examined  in  the  regression  analysis  were  utilized  in  the  discriminant  function  analysis. 
The  purpose  of  this  exercise  was  to  define  the  combination  of  phenetic  traits  which 
best  distinguishes  the  Central  American  species  of  Chiropterotriton  from  one  another, 
and  to  eliminate  the  effects  of  intercorrelation  among  characters  in  assessing  mor- 
phological similarity  among  species.  This  latter  aim  is  realized  because  discriminant 
analysis  defines  statistically  independent  composite  axes,  each  of  which  corresponds 
to  independently  varying  character  complexes  (see  Blackith  and  Reyment  1971).  The 
Smithsonian  Institution’s  version  of  the  SPSS  program  for  stepwise  discriminant  anal- 
ysis was  used  for  all  computations. 

Phenetic  clustering  of  taxa:  The  discriminant  analysis  defines  the  centroid  of 
each  species  cluster  with  respect  to  each  of  the  seven  discriminant  axes  which  exist 
for  an  analysis  of  eight  groups  and  eight  characters.  Because  the  distances  between 
points  in  discriminant  space  (“D-space”)  are  not  biased  by  intercorrelations  among 
characters,  as  is  the  case  if  phenetic  distance  is  measured  in  simple  Euclidian  space, 
it  is  often  preferable  to  base  phenetic  clustering  on  the  scores  along  the  major  dis- 
criminant axes  (for  an  example  of  the  different  results  of  these  two  metrics  see  Rob- 
inson and  Hoffmann  1975).  The  latter  axes  are  said  to  define  a “reduced  space” 
because  most  interspecific  differentiation  can  be  expressed  using  only  a few  of  the 
maximum  possible  number  of  discriminant  axes.  A two-  or  three-dimensional  rep- 
resentation of  the  group  centroids  (or  of  individual  specimens)  in  discriminant  space 
often  suffices  as  a summary  of  significant  interspecific  variation. 

With  the  above  in  mind,  we  have  used  the  generalized  distance  (=Mahalanobis 
Distance)  between  the  group  centroids  with  respect  to  the  first  three  discriminant  axes 
as  the  basis  for  phenetic  clustering.  The  unweighted  pair  group  method  using  arith- 
metic averages  (UPGMA),  as  described  by  Sokal  and  Sneath  (1963)  and  Sneath  and 
Sokal  (1973)  was  the  clustering  algorithm  employed.  The  UPGMA  technique  is  a 
sequential,  agglomerative,  hierarchic,  non-overlapping  method  (see  Sneath  and  Sokal, 
1973)  which  begins  by  defining  a cluster  (or  several  clusters)  consisting  of  the  least 
dissimilar  Operational  Taxonomic  Units  (OTU’s),  then  adds  individual  OTU’s  or  other 
clusters  to  pre-existing  clusters  on  the  basis  of  average  phenetic  similarity. 

A second  technique,  the  Prim  algorithm  (see  Prim  1957;  Farris  1970;  Sneath  and 
Sokal  1973),  was  used  to  form  a minimum-spanning  network  connecting  the  eight 
OTU’s,  again  based  on  the  generalized  distance  separating  them.  This  algorithm  min- 


12 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  294 


imizes  the  total  length  of  the  internodes  connecting  the  OTU’s,  and  results  in  closest 
phenetic  neighbors  always  being  linked  by  an  internode.  When  superimposed  on  a 
display  of  group  centroids  in  reduced  space,  the  Prim  network  provides  a useful  check 
on  the  adequacy  of  the  visual  impression  of  inter-OTU  distances  (see  Sneath  and 
Sokal,  1973:  255-256). 


Results 

Analysis  of  individual  characters:  Figure  5 and  Table  1 summarize  the  results 
of  the  regression  analysis  of  single  characters  in  post-juvenile  males  of  the  eight  spe- 
cies of  Chiropterotriton.  C.  veraepacis  has  a longer  tail  and  narrower  head  than  the 
other  species  in  the  comparison.  The  95%  confidence  limits  of  the  projected  mean 
values  of  TL  and  HW  at  SL  = 30  mm  show  no  overlap  between  C.  veraepacis  and 
any  of  the  remaining  taxa.  Some  overlap  is  evident  with  respect  to  the  other  five 
characters  considered  in  the  analysis,  butC.  veraepacis  differs  significantly  (P<0.05) 
from  every  other  species  in  from  three  to  six  characters.  The  95%  confidence  limits 
for  projected  character  values  tend  to  be  relatively  broad  for  C.  veraepacis  and  C. 
nasalis,  probably  reflecting  their  small  sample  sizes. 

A mosaic  pattern  of  differentiation  is  found.  For  example,  high  maxillary  tooth 
counts  may  be  associated  with  high  vomerine  tooth  counts  (C.  xolocalcae ),  moderate 


species 

tail  length 
30  36,  42  48 

head  width 
40  ,4.5  , 49 

combined 
limb  length 
10,  12  14, 16, 

foot  width 

,2.0  , , 30 

number  of 
maxillary  teeth 
30  40  50,60 

number  of 
vomerine  teeth 
10  14  18 

nostril  diameter 
0.2  1.0  2.0 

C.  veraepacis 

H- 

■h 

H- 

4 

-4. 

4 

■4 

C.  nasalis 

4 

4 

"+■ 

■4 

4 

C.  picadoi 

■4 

♦ 

4 

4 

4 

4 

C.  bromehacio 

4 

4 

4 

4 

4 

4 

4 

C.  cuchumatanus 

4 

+ 

4 

H- 

■4 

4 

C.  megarhinus 

4 

4 

4 

4 

•4 

4 

4 

C.  rabbi 

4. 

4 

4 

4 

4 

-4- 

4 

C.  xolocalcae 

* 

4 

4 

4 

4 

4 

4 

1 1 1 III  1 1 1 l 
30  36  42  48 

in  ri  rr  II  i i 

40  4.5  4.9 

10  12  14  16 

2 o'  ' ' 'io 

30  40  50  60 

10  14  18 

0 2 ' ' i o'  '2  0 

Figure  5.  Predicted  mean  (vertical  line)  and  95%  confidence  limits  (solid  bar)  for  eight 
characters  in  post-juvenile  males  of  eight  species  of  Chiropterotriton-beta.  See  text  for  further 
explanation.  Note  that  the  column  “head  width”  was  incorrectly  labeled  “head  length”  in  a 
similar  figure  in  Lynch  and  Wake  (1975,  fig.  7).  All  figures  in  mm. 


Predicted  mean  character  values  and  95%  confidence  limits  (i 


1978 


A new  Guatemalan  Chiropterotriton  species 


13 


ON 

<n 

* 

r- 

(N 

Q 

co  © 

9 d 
° 9 

£ 9 

(N  9 

Z 

o £ 

d 

o 

o 

d 

d' 

q 

H 

\ 2 

* d 

oo  d 

> 

ON  d 

co  d) 

ZZ  no 

o 6 

d 

s / 

w 

__ 

Os 

o 

*— i 

ON  S 

* d 

r-~  in 

9 d 

s 

? OO 

ON  d 

-rf- 

?i  -A 

r- 

^ <N 

r-> 

co 

^f 

(N 

S 

on 

& 

H 

U 

oo 

d" 

00 

oo  d 

oo  co’ 

r-  d 

Cd 

(N  d 

<n  o 

d q 

< 

U 

ri 

d 

r— | 

> — s 

, — s 

, s 

1 

oo 

NO 

d 

NO  ^ 

<N  9 

Tf  O 

u 

d d 

d ^ 

9 d 

d 

d 

o 

N ' 

w 

1—1 

Cq 

co 

o d 

NO  d 

CN  d 

d On 

d d 

d d 

co 

d 

d 

W 

oo 

Co 

o 

d 

O $ 

9 S 

o 5 

H 

9 * 

£ 9 

K <k 

o 

o 

of 

Tf 

CO 

co 

1 

' ' 

00 

o 

CO 

on 

d 

OO 

00 

<N 

(N 

(N 

Z 

00 

T- 

NO 

on 

W 

•S 

o 

u 

Q 

pq 

•2 

Oh 

on 

5 

i~-~j 

<3 

»5 

.o 

c 

5, 

cj 

d 

d 

14 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  294 


(C.  nasalis ),  or  low  (C.  veraepacis)  vomerine  tooth  counts.  An  exception  to  the  pat- 
tern of  independent  variation  of  characters  is  the  invariable  association  of  large  nostril 
size  with  low  numbers  of  vomerine  teeth  (previously  noted  in  the  bromeliacia  group, 
Lynch  and  Wake  1975).  C.  picadoi  is  exceptional  in  having  both  few  vomerine  teeth 
and  very  small  nostrils.  This  species  possesses  a well-developed  preorbital  vomerine 
process,  as  do  the  other  small-nostriled  species  (C.  rabbi,  C.  xolocalcae ) in  the  anal- 
ysis, but  the  presence  of  the  process  is  not  always  associated  with  a large  complement 
of  vomerine  teeth  in  other  plethodontid  salamanders  (see  Wake  1966;  Lynch  and  Wake 
1975:  34-35).  Thus,  our  earlier  conclusion  that  the  preorbital  vomerine  process  is 
necessary,  but  not  sufficient,  for  the  presence  of  a large  number  of  vomerine  teeth, 
is  not  affected  by  the  pattern  seen  in  C.  picadoi. 

Discriminant  analysis:  Figure  6 and  Table  2 summarize  the  results  of  the  stepwise 
discriminant  analysis  of  interspecific  variation.  The  absolute  magnitudes  of  the  stan- 
dardized discriminant  coefficients  (Table  2)  are  proportional  to  the  relative  importance 
of  each  character  in  separating  the  species  along  each  discriminant  axis.  The  first  three 
discriminant  axes,  representing  the  first  three  discriminant  functions,  together  account 
for  95.7%  of  the  observed  interspecific  morphological  variation.  Although  the  con- 


Table  2 

Summary  of  results  of  stepwise  multiple  discriminant  analysis  of  variation 
in  post-juvenile  male  Chiropterotriton.  Raw  (unstandardized)  and  stan- 
dardized coefficients  are  given  for  the  first  three  discriminant  functions, 
which  together  account  for  95.7%  of  the  observed  interspecific  variation. 
The  magnitudes  of  the  standardized  coefficients  are  proportional  to  the 
relative  contribution  of  each  variable  on  a given  discriminant  axis.  The 
most  important  variables  on  each  axis  are  marked  with  an  asterisk  (*). 


DISCRIMINANT  FUNCTION 
FIRST  SECOND  THIRD 


CHARACTER 

Raw 

Stand. 

Raw 

Stand. 

Raw 

Stand. 

SL 

0.008 

0.022 

0.058 

0.157* 

-0.076 

-0.204* 

TL 

0.003 

0.012 

0.029 

0.128* 

0.021 

0.092 

HW 

-0.078 

-0.042 

-0.083 

-0.045 

-0.167 

-0.090 

CL 

0.006 

0.015 

-0.147 

-0.362* 

-0.040 

-0.100 

FW 

-0.076 

-0.046 

-0.060 

-0.036 

0.183 

0.111 

MT 

0.001 

0.011 

-0.003 

-0.028 

0.036 

0.350* 

VT 

-0.012 

-0.060 

-0.007 

-0.038 

-0.008 

-0.041 

ND 

0.521 

0.403* 

-0.061 

-0.047 

-0.050 

-0.038 

CONSTANT 

0.391 

0.280 

1. 

,172 

PER  CENT 
VARIATION 

EXPLAINED  54.13  32.98  8.59 


1978 


A new  Guatemalan  Chiropterotriton  species 


15 


Figure  6.  Plot  of  the  first  three  discriminant  axes  separating  post-juvenile  males  of  the  species 
of  the  Chiropterotriton  bromeliacia  group  [bromeliacia  (B),  cuchumatanus  (C),  megarhinus 
(M),  rabbi  (R),  xolocalcae  (X)]  plus  C.  veraepacis  (V),  C.  nasalis  (N),  and  C.  picadoi  (P). 
The  dots  are  the  positions  of  the  group  centroids  for  each  species  relative  to  these  three  variates. 
The  centroids  are  connected  by  a computed  Prim  network,  which  links  the  closest  phenetic 
neighbors.  C.  picadoi  is  about  equally  close  to  three  species.  See  text  for  further  explanation. 

tributions  of  three  of  the  remaining  four  discriminant  axes  are  statistically  significant 
(P<0.05),  their  cumulative  impact  on  the  discriminatory  process  is  small  (4.3%).  The 
first  discriminant  function  accounts  for  54.1%  of  the  interspecific  variation;  nostril 
diameter  (ND)  is  by  far  the  most  important  determinant  of  the  score  along  this  axis, 
as  was  also  found  to  be  the  case  in  our  earlier  study  of  the  bromeliacia  group.  The 
second  discriminant  function  (33.0%  of  interspecific  variation)  is  influenced  most 
strongly  by  limb  length  (CL),  and  its  most  obvious  effect  is  to  sharply  distinguish  the 
short-limbed  C.  picadoi  from  all  other  species.  The  third  discriminant  function  (8.6% 
of  interspecific  variation)  shows  high  loading  for  maxillary  tooth  count  (MT)  and,  to 
a lesser  extent,  standard  length  (SL)  and  foot  width  (FW).  This  axis  tends  to  separate 
C.  veraepacis  and  C.  nasalis  from  C.  picadoi  and  the  bromeliacia  group  species. 


16 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  294 


Table  3 

Generalized  (Mahalanobis)  distance  values  for  centroids  of  eight  OTU’s. 
D = mean  generalized  distance. 


SPECIES  2 3 

1.  C . bromeliacia  1.142  0.865 

2.  C.  xolocalcae  0.402 

3.  C.  rabbi 

4.  C.  cuchumatanus 

5.  C.  megarhinus 

6.  C.  veraepacis 

7.  C.  nasalis 

8.  C.  picadoi 


4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

D 

0.368 

0.664 

0.905 

0.912 

1.123 

0.854 

0.871 

1.211 

1.126 

1.214 

1.166 

1.019 

0.595 

1.012 

0.996 

1.073 

1.075 

0.860 

0.725 

0.940 

0.953 

1.226 

0.811 

0.406 

0.323 

1.307 

0.807 

0.144 

1.124 

0.806 

1.253 

0.839 

1.182 

A three  dimensional  projection  of  the  group  centroids  of  each  of  the  eight  species 
in  relation  to  the  first  three  discriminant  axes  (Figure  6)  summarizes  the  differentiation 
achieved  by  these  axes.  Viewed  in  D-space,  C.  picadoi  appears  to  be  the  most  isolated 
of  the  eight  species,  mainly  by  virtue  of  its  very  high  positive  score  along  the  second 
discriminant  axis.  A close  phenetic  relationship  between  C.  nasalis  and  C.  veraepacis 
is  evident,  and  these  two  species  appear  more  similar  to  C.  megarhinus  than  to  any 
of  the  other  bromeliacia  group. 

Table  3 gives  the  Mahalanobis  distances  separating  the  group  centroids  of  the 
eight  species  in  the  D-space  defined  by  the  first  three  discriminant  axes.  The  impres- 
sions gained  from  inspection  of  the  three  dimensional  plot  of  group  centroids  are 
strengthened  by  these  distance  estimates.  The  most  similar  pair  of  species  is  C.  nasalis 
and  C.  veraepacis  (D  = 0.14  units);  no  other  species  pair  is  separated  by  less  than 
0.32  units,  the  latter  being  the  distance  between  C.  nasalis  and  C.  megarhinus.  At 
the  other  extreme,  C.  picadoi  shows  no  strong  similarity  to  any  of  the  other  species 
(D  = 1.18;  range  1.07-1.31). 

Despite  the  similarities  of  most  of  the  species  in  gross  appearance,  the  discrim- 
inant analysis  succeeded  in  assigning  95%  of  the  130  individual  specimens  to  the 
“correct”  home  population  on  the  basis  of  morphometric  criteria  alone  (Table  4). 
This  result  confirms  the  utility  of  multivariate  approaches  in  making  morphological 
comparisons  among  OTU’s  which  show  complex  patterns  of  overlap  in  single  char- 
acters and  which  exhibit  size-related  variation  in  most  morphological  traits.  Of  the 
seven  misidentifications  which  occurred,  three  were  assignments  of  C.  bromeliacia 
and  C.  rabbi  to  C.  cuchumatanus,  three  were  assignments  of  C.  rabbi  to  C.  xolo- 
calcae, or  vice  versa,  and  one  is  a misclassification  of  C.  nasalis  as  C.  megarhinus . 
In  spite  of  the  small  overall  phenetic  separation  of  C.  nasalis  and  C.  veraepacis  in- 
dividuals of  both  species  were  not  mismatched  by  the  discriminant  procedure. 

Phenetic  clustering;  The  Prim  network  linking  the  eight  Chiropterotriton  species 
is  superimposed  over  the  three-dimensional  projection  of  the  group  centroids  in  figure 
6.  The  distortion  resulting  from  the  geometry  of  the  projection  and  from  the  omission 


1978 


A new  Guatemalan  Chiropterotriton  species 


17 


Table  4 

Classification  matrix  based  on  discriminant  analysis  of  post-juvenile  male 
Chiropterotriton  from  eight  populations.  Entries  along  the  main  diagonal 
are  “correct”  matches  of  individuals  to  their  source  population  based  on 
eight  morphological  characters.  See  text  for  further  explanation. 


PREDICTED  GROUP  MEMBERSHIP 


1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

Actual  Group 

N 

1.  C.  bromeliacia 

33 

32 

0 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2.  C.  xo locale ae 

22 

0 

21 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3.  C.  rabbi 

22 

0 

2 

18 

2 

0 

0 

0 

0 

4.  C.  cuchumatanus 

9 

0 

0 

0 

9 

0 

0 

0 

0 

5.  C.  megarhinus 

13 

0 

0 

0 

0 

13 

0 

0 

0 

6.  C.  veraepacis 

8 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

8 

0 

0 

7.  C.  nasalis 

7 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

0 

6 

0 

8.  C.  picadoi 

16 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

16 

of  the  fourth  and  higher  discriminant  axes  evidently  is  small,  for  the  Prim  linkage  of 
OTU’s  which  show  the  highest  phenetic  similarity  conforms  well  with  the  visual 
impression  of  similarities  gained  from  the  projection.  The  network  is  basically  a chain 
which  connects  seven  of  the  species  in  the  order  xolocalcae-rabbi-cuchumatanus- 
bromeliacia-megarhinus-nasalis-veraepacis . The  eighth  species,  C.  picadoi,  lies  well 
off  this  main  sequence,  and  is  about  equally  as  distant  from  C.  rabbi,  C.  bromeliacia, 
and  C.  nasalis. 

The  UPGMA  phenogram,  based  on  the  same  matrix  of  generalized  inter-OTU 
distances  used  to  construct  the  Prim  network,  is  shown  in  figure  7.  Summarizing,  we 
see  a tight  cluster  formed  by  C.  veraepacis  and  C.  nasalis,  which  is  connected  to 
the‘ ‘looser”  grouping  of  four  bromeliacia  group  species  by  C.  megarhinus,  the  fifth 
species  in  that  group.  C.  picadoi  shows  slightly  more  similarity  to  the  small-nostriled 
members  of  the  bromeliacia  group  than  to  the  other  OTU’s,  but  it  is  not  very  similar 
to  any  of  the  species.  The  linkage  pattern  among  the  five  species  of  the  bromeliacia 
group  produced  by  the  UPGMA  analysis  is  identical  to  that  derived  previously  (Lynch 
and  Wake  1975:  Fig.  10a)  from  an  11 -character  phylogenetic  clustering  algorithm, 
the  WISS  method  of  Farris,  Kluge,  and  Eckhardt  (1970). 

DISCUSSION 

The  species  of  Chiropterotriton  considered  in  this  paper  have  several  ecologically 
important  features  in  common.  All  are  small,  arboreal  or  crevice-dwelling  salaman- 
ders which  inhabit  wet  montane  forest,  and  all  have  very  limited  geographic  ranges. 
Sympatry  between  congeners  is  unknown  in  northern  Central  American  Chiroptero- 


18 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  294 


Figure  7.  UPGMA  phenogram  of  eight  species  of  Chiropterotriton  based  on  Mahalanobis 
Distance  between  group  centroids  with  respect  to  the  first  three  discriminant  axes.  (B)  C. 
bromeliacia;  (C)  C.  cuchumatanus;  (M)  C.  megarhinus;  (N)  C.  nasalis;  (P)  C . picadoi;  (R) 
C.  rabbi;  (V)  C.  veraepacis;  (X)  C.  xolocalcae.  See  text  for  futher  explanation. 

triton,  although  co-occurrence  of  several  pairs  of  species  of  Chiropterotriton- alpha 
has  been  documented  north  of  the  Isthmus  of  Tehuantepec  in  the  Sierra  Madre  Ori- 
ental. In  addition,  C.  picadoi  and  C.  richardi  of  the  beta  assemblage  are  sympatric 
in  Costa  Rica.  In  the  absence  of  a sympatry  test,  one  can  always  argue  that  the  isolated 
populations  of  Chiropterotriton  in  Central  America  do  not  merit  full  specific  rank. 
However,  the  unique  combination  of  external  morphometric  traits  which  characterizes 
each  of  the  Central  American  populations,  combined  with  the  osteological  differences 
between  most  of  the  forms,  makes  it  highly  likely  that  these  populations  do  in  fact 
represent  separate  evolutionary  units.  We  are  actively  investigating  genetic  divergence 
between  species  of  tropical  salamanders,  and  results  to  date  lend  support  to  our  con- 
clusions based  on  morphology. 

The  data  from  morphometries  and  from  osteology  produce  somewhat  conflicting 


1978 


A new  Guatemalan  Chiropterotriton  species 


19 


pictures  of  evolutionary  relationships.  The  UPGMA  clustering  technique  based  on  the 
external  morphology  and  dentition  places  C.  nasalis  and  C.  veraepacis  well  within 
the  bromeliacia  group.  These  seven  species  share  more  in  common  ecologically  than 
they  do  osteologically.  All  are  small  species  that  occur  in  basically  arboreal  sites  in 
cloud  forests.  They  appear  to  be  ecomorphs,  with  similar,  adaptive  structural  re- 
sponses to  similar  selective  pressures.  Certainly  one  reasonable  hypothesis  is  that  they 
are  close  relatives,  derived  from  a common  stock  that  was,  itself,  adapted  to  climbing 
in  cloud  forest  habitats. 

On  osteological  grounds  this  suggestion  does  not  appear  to  be  valid.  An  alternate 
hypothesis  postulates  an  early  separation  between  the  ancestors  of  the  bromeliacia 
group  and  the  ancestors  of  all  other  Chiropterotriton- beta.  These  two  lineages  are 
sister  groups,  in  the  sense  of  Hennig  (1966),  with  both  lineages  displaying  both  prim- 
itive and  derived  characters.  The  bromeliacia  group  has  remained  in  Nuclear  Central 
America,  and  has  speciated  but  not  undergone  much  additional  differentiation.  In  con- 
trast, the  other  assemblage  is  rather  diverse,  and  widespread.  C.  veraepacis  and  C. 
nasalis  are  close  relatives,  distinct  from  each  other  in  morphometric  features  but  not 
in  osteology.  The  cladistic  species  pattern  of  figure  4 leads  us  to  suggest  that  mor- 
phological similarity  of  these  two  species  to  the  bromeliacia  group  results  from  con- 
vergence by  different  stocks  in  response  to  similar  selective  pressures. 

On  osteological  grounds  both  C.  richardi  and  C.  barbouri  seem  allied  with  C. 
picadoi,  C.  nasalis,  and  C.  veraepacis  rather  than  with  the  bromeliacia  group.  C. 
barbouri  is  a relative  of  C.  nasalis  and  C.  veraepacis  and  is  somewhat  intermediate 
between  these  two  species  and  C.  picadoi  in  osteological  structure.  Possibly  C.  ri- 
chardi is  the  earliest  known  derivative  of  a Chiropterotriton  -beta  stock.  It  is  the  only 
species  in  Central  America  with  any  degree  of  resemblance  to  members  of  the  genus 
Oedipina,  lives  sympatrically  with  species  of  that  genus,  and,  like  Oedipina,  has  been 
found  living  in  holes  in  moss-covered  earth  banks.  This  elongate,  diminutive  animal 
with  very  short  limbs  and  a long  tail,  closely  resembles  juvenile  Oedipina  in  habitus. 
Possibly  it  is  a semi-fossorial  form. 

A general  character  state  formula  for  the  genus  Oedipina  is:  a,  b,  c.  d,  E,  f,  g, 
h (one  population  of  one  species  of  Oedipina  appears  to  have  septomaxillaries  but  b 
rather  than  B is  used  because  of  the  clear  preponderance  of  that  state).  This  formula 
is  compatible  with  the  hypothesis  that  an  animal  rather  like  C.  richardi  might  have 
given  rise  to  Oedipina  . Further  suggestion  of  relationship  comes  from  details  of  the 
structure  of  the  feet  of  C.  richardi  and  Oedipina.  In  addition  to  having  the  carpal  and 
tarsal  fusions  typical  of  the  nasalis  group  (character  states  d,  f),  C.  richardi  also  has 
a fusion  of  the  centrale  and  distal  carpal  4,  (Fig.  3).  Oedipina  also  typically  has  all 
of  these  fusions,  and  fusion  of  distal  carpal  4 and  the  centrale  has  also  been  reported 
in  Parvimolge  toxvnsendi  and  various  species  of  Thorius  (Wake  1966).  Fusion  of  the 
tibiale  and  centrale  occurs  in  the  tarsus  of  C.  richardi,  but  has  not  been  encountered 
elsewhere. 

The  relationship  of  C.  picadoi  to  other  species  of  Chiropterotriton -beta  is  ob- 
scure. On  the  basis  of  sharing  many  derived  states  with  C.  barbouri,  C.  nasalis,  and 
C.  veraepacis  (b,  c,  d,  f,  g)  we  are  tempted  to  postulate  close  relationship.  Yet,  C. 


20 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  294 


picadoi  is  very  different  from  these  three  species  in  external  morphological  features 
and  dentition.  It  has  very  short  limbs  and  small  feet,  and  in  many  features  resembles 
the  even  more  elongate  and  short-limbed  C.  richardi. 

We  earlier  (Wake  and  Lynch  1976)  assigned  C.  nasalis,  C.  barbouri,  C.  ri- 
chardi, and  C.  picadoi  to  a nasalis  group,  thus  placing  all  Chiropterotriton- beta  in 
but  two  groups.  We  retain  that  arrangement  here,  but  note  that  the  nasalis  group  is 
morphologically  far  more  diverse  than  the  bromeliacia  group. 

Zoogeographic  patterns  conform  well  with  our  hypothesis  concerning  evolution- 
ary relationships.  The  bromeliacia  group  is  a cluster  of  species  with  high  phenetic 
similarity  sharing  many  derived  osteological  characters.  They  are  so  far  known  from 
a number  of  localitites  in  western  Guatemala  and  Chiapas.  The  nasalis  group  is  far 
more  diverse  than  the  bromeliacia  group  in  morphometric  and  osteological  traits. 
When  additional  information  becomes  available  it  may  be  possible  to  subdivide  the 
nasalis  group  into  three  parts:  1)  C.  nasalis,  C.  barbouri,  andC.  veraepacis,  a mainly 
northeastern  group  of  arboreal  species  from  Guatemala  and  Honduras  that  seems  well 
defined  osteologically;  2)  C.  picadoi  of  Costa  Rica,  allied  to  the  former  three  species 
by  derived  osteological  traits  but  not  by  ecology  or  external  morphology;  3)  C.  ri- 
chardi of  Costa  Rica,  a highly  distinctive,  diminutive,  elongate  species  with  a com- 
bination of  generalized  (skull)  and  specialized  (feet)  osteological  traits  that  distinguish 
it  from  all  other  species  of  Chiropterotriton . 

The  recent  (February,  1976)  Guatemalan  earthquake  has  led  to  renewed  interest 
in  the  structure  and  history  of  Nuclear  Central  America,  one  of  the  most  complex  and 
seismically  active  regions  of  the  world.  As  a result  of  detailed  investigations  of  land 
movements  during  the  earthquake,  the  principal  faults  have  been  sharply  defined,  and 
the  history  of  the  region  has  been  placed  in  new  perspective.  The  Cocos  plate  is 
moving  from  the  southwest  and  being  subducted  where  it  meets  the  Caribbean  and 
North  American  plates  in  what  Plafker  (1976)  calls  the  Middle  American  Megathrust. 
The  North  American  plate  is  moving  mainly  westward,  and  the  Caribbean  plate  is 
being  forced  eastward  by  the  combined  plate  movements.  The  Motagua  fault,  clearly 
outlined  by  the  recent  earthquake,  lies  at  the  border  of  the  Caribbean  and  North 
American  plates.  The  extreme  western  end  of  the  Caribbean  plate  is  being  “squeezed” 
between  the  Cocos  and  North  American  plates,  and  Plafker  speaks  of  this  region  as 
being  “decoupled”  from  the  plate.  This  is  the  area  of  maximum  volcanic  activity  in 
southern  Guatemala.  The  amount  of  movement  along  the  Motagua  fault  has  been 
great,  with  a probable  minimum  movement  of  200  km  since  Miocene  being  estimated 
by  Plafker.  Estimates  of  total  movement  along  the  fault  range  from  a few  hundred  to 
over  1000  km.  The  movements  are  great  enough  and  recent  enough  to  have  had  pro- 
found impact  on  salamander  distribution  and  evolution  in  the  area.  Chiropterotriton, 
for  example,  is  restricted  to  montane  and  lower  montane  cloud  forests  in  Central 
America.  Low  mountain  ridges  of  nearly  continous  cloud  forest  are  required  for  dis- 
persal of  these  salamanders.  In  the  present  instance,  we  have  shown  thatC.  veraepacis 
and  C.  nasalis  are  similar  in  structure  and  we  think  that  they  are  close  relatives.  C. 
veraepacis  is  found  in  a region  that  lies  a little  over  100  km  west  of  the  nearest 
population  of  C.  nasalis.  However,  C.  veraepacis  occurs  to  the  north  of  the  Motagua 
fault,  right  along  a branch  of  the  Polochic  fault,  on  the  edge  of  the  North  American 


1978 


A new  Guatemalan  Chiropterotriton  species 


21 


plate,  while  C.  nasalis  occurs  to  the  south  and  east  of  the  fault  zone,  on  the  Caribbean 
plate.  Thus  there  is  no  continuous  montane  link  between  the  two  areas  now,  and  it 
is  extremely  unlikely  that  one  has  extended  across  the  fault  in  the  past.  It  is  more 
likely  that  the  two  species  populations  have  dispersed  to  their  present  sites  by  routes 
extending  from  the  west  in  both  instances.  Presumably  these  populations  have  been 
separated  for  long  periods  of  time. 

Chiropterotriton- beta  is  sufficiently  different  from  Chiropterotriton- alpha  that 
the  erection  of  a new  genus  for  the  former  group  might  be  justified.  We  choose  not 
to  do  so  at  this  time,  for  Chiropterotriton  -beta  is  so  diverse  in  structure  that  it  would 
be  difficult  to  diagnose  meaningfully.  Further,  the  osteo logical  evidence  presented 
here  suggests  that  even  a finer  division  of  Chiropterotriton  may  be  required  than  a 
simple  two-way  split.  The  key  species  in  any  future  taxonomic  revision  of  this  group 
is  C.  richardi,  a highly  specialized  species  that  might  be  derived  from  an  early  stock 
that  gave  rise  not  only  to  the  remainder  of  Chiropterotriton -beta  but  also  Oedipina. 

The  present  study  supports  the  view  that  a great  amount  of  evolutionary  differ- 
entiation has  occurred  in  the  lineages  of  plethodontid  salamanders  in  the  New  World 
tropics. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

This  research  has  been  supported  by  the  National  Science  Foundation  (current 
grant  BMS  74-20922,  D.  B.  Wake,  Principal  Investigator).  Thomas  Uzzell  gener- 
ously provided  information  and  lent  us  important  specimens,  for  which  we  are  most 
grateful.  We  continue  to  benefit  from  the  counsel  of  L.  C.  Stuart  in  our  work  on 
tropical  salamanders.  Figure  1 was  executed  by  Samuel  S.  Sweet,  and  Gene  M. 
Christman  aided  in  the  preparation  of  the  other  illustrations.  Pedro  Alberch  prepared 
the  Spanish  summary. 


RESUMEN 

En  este  trabajo  se  describe  una  diminuta  nueva  especie  de  salamandra  pleth- 
odontida  de  grandes  narinas,  Chiropterotriton  veraepacis,  que  habita  en  bromeliaceas 
en  la  zona  de  bosque  nublado  montano  al  sur  de  Puruhla,  Baja  Verapaz,  Guatemala 
y en  las  zonas  cercanas  de  Alta  Verapaz,  Guatemala.  C.  veraepacis  muestra  seme- 
janzas  en  muchos  caracteres  feneticos  con  C.  nasalis  del  nordeste  de  Honduras,  que 
es  una  especie  de  cola  mas  corta,  cabeza  mas  ancha  y narinas  de  mayor  tamano.  La 
nueva  especie  se  asemeja  en  ecologfa  y algunos  caracteres  estructurales  a las  especies 
del  grupo  bromeliacea  de  Guatemala  y Chiapas,  pero  difiere  de  ellas  en  caracteres 
osteologicos. 

A pesar  de  que  C.  nasalis  y C.  veraepacis  son  muy  distintos  en  la  mayoria  de 
caracteres  morfologicos  y ecologicos  de  la  especie  costarricense  C.  picadoi,  estas 
especies  son  parecidas  en  osteologia.  Tambien  se  presenta  informacion  adicional  re- 
ferente  a las  poco  conocidas  especies,  C.  richardi  (Costa  Rica)  y C.  barbouri  (Hon- 
duras). Asimismo  se  tratan  las  posibles  relaciones  entre  las  especies  de  este  genero. 


22 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  294 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Blackith,  R.  E.  and  R.  A.  Reyment.  1971.  Multivariate  Morphometries.  Academic  Press, 
London  and  N.Y.,  ix  + 412  pp. 

Farris,  J.  S.  1970.  Methods  for  computing  Wagner  Trees.  Syst.  Zool.  16:  83-92. 

Farris,  J.  S.,  A.  G.  Kluge  and  M.  J.  Eckhardt.  1970.  A numerical  approach  to  phylogenetic 
systematics.  Syst.  Zool.  19:  172-189. 

Hennig,  W.  1966.  Phylogenetic  Systematics.  Trans.  D.  D.  Davis,  R.  Zangerl.  Univ.  Illinois 
Press,  Urbana.  263  pp. 

Holdridge,  L.  R.  1967.  Life  zone  ecology  (2nd  ed.)  Tropical  Sci.  Center,  Costa  Rica.  206  pp. 

Instituto  Geografico  Nacional  (Guatemala).  1966.  Atlas  preliminar  de  Guatemala. 

Lynch,  James  F.  and  D.  B.  Wake.  1975.  Systematics  of  the  Chiropterotriton  bromeliacia 
group  (Amphibia:  Caudata),  with  description  of  two  new  species  from  Guatemala.  Los 
Angeles  County  Nat.  Hist.  Mus.  Contrib.  Sci.  265:  1-45. 

Plafker,  G.  1976.  Tectonic  aspects  of  the  Guatemala  earthquake  of  4 February  1976.  Science, 
193:  1201-1208. 

Prim,  R.  C.  1957.  Shortest  connection  networks  and  some  generalizations.  Bell  System  Tech. 
J.  36:  1389-1401. 

Robinson,  J.  W.  and  R.  S.  Hoffmann.  1975.  Geographical  and  interspecific  cranial  variation 
in  big-eared  ground  squirrels  ( Spermophilus ):  a multivariate  study.  Syst.  Zool.  24:  79-188. 

Savage,  J.  M.  1975.  Systematics  and  distribution  of  the  Mexican  and  Central  American  stream 
frogs  related  to  Eleutherodactylus  rugulosus.  Copeia,  1975:  254-306. 

Sneath,  P.  H.  A.  and  R.  R.  Sokal.  1973.  Numerical  Taxonomy.  Freeman  and  Co.,  San 
Francisco:  xv  -I-  573  pp. 

Sokal,  R.  R.  and  P.  H.  A.  Sneath,  1963.  Principles  of  Numerical  Taxonomy.  Freeman  and 
Co.,  San  Francisco,  xvi  -I-  359  pp. 

Stuart,  L.  C.  1948.  The  amphibians  and  reptiles  of  Alta  Verapaz,  Guatemala.  Misc.  Publ. 
Mus.  Zool.  Univ.  Michigan,  69:  1-109. 

Wake,  D.  B.  1966.  Comparative  osteology  and  evolution  of  the  lungless  salamanders,  family 
Plethodontidae.  So.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci.,  Mem.  4:  1-111. 

Wake,  D.  B.  and  J.  F.  Lynch.  1976.  The  distribution,  ecology,  and  evolutionary  history  of 
plethodontid  salamanders  in  tropical  America.  Bull.  Nat.  Hist.  Mus.  Los  Angeles  Co.  25: 
1-65. 


Accepted  for  publication  October  27,  1976. 


SOI-  73 

cau^s 


NUMBER  295 
MAY  15,  1978 


FISHES  OF  THE  SANTA  CLARA  RIVER  SYSTEM, 
SOUTHERN  CALIFORNIA 


ft 


0A  HSOW/^jT 


MAY  2 2 1978 


By  Michael  A.  Bell 


NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 


CONTRIBUTDNS  IN  SCENC6 


Published  by  the  NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM 
OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007 


SERIAL  PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE 
NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 


Prior  to  November  30,  1973,  publications  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  have  appeared 
under  various  formats — Leaflet  Series,  Museum  Graphic,  Science  Series,  Study  Guides,  Con- 
tributions in  Science,  Contributions  in  History,  Science  Bulletins,  unnumbered  catalogs  of 
exhibitions,  and  other  miscellaneous  publications.  The  Museum  now  publishes  the  following 
serials  at  irregular  internals  as  CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE,  HISTORY  BULLETINS, 
SCIENCE  BULLETINS,  EDUCATION  SERIES,  HISTORY  SERIES,  and  SCIENCE  SE- 
RIES. The  Contributions  are  short  papers  of  octavo  size.  The  Bulletins  are  longer,  compre- 
hensive papers  of  quarto  size.  The  Series  are  papers  of  variable  lengths  of  quarto  or  larger 
size.  Papers  in  each  serial  are  numbered  separately  and  consecutively. 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  contain  articles  in  the  earth  and  life  sciences,  presenting 
results  of  original  research.  Emphasis  is  intended  principally  for  papers  allied  to  biosystematic 
research,  but  other  subjects  and  review-oriented  ones  will  be  considered.  Number  1 was  issued 
on  January  23,  1957.  Contributions  must  be  not  less  than  8 nor  exceed  72  printed  pages. 


INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  AUTHORS 

Acceptance  of  manuscripts  will  be  determined  by  the  significance  of  new  information.  Priority  j 
will  be  given  to  manuscripts  by  staff  members.  All  manuscripts  must  be  recommended  by  the 
curator  in  charge  of  each  discipline  or  by  the  Editorial  Board.  Manuscripts  must  conform  to 
the  specifications  listed  below.  They  will  be  examined  for  suitability  by  the  Editorial  Board 
and  will  include  review  by  specialists  outside  the  Museum. 

Authors  must  adhere  to  the  International  Code  of  Nomenclature  of  Bacteria  and  Viruses, 
International  Code  of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  and  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature, including  their  respective  recommendations.  Further,  authors  proposing  new  taxa  in 
a CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  must  indicate  that  all  primary  types  have  been  deposited 
in  an  appropriate  scientific  institution  of  their  choice  and  must  cite  that  institution  by  name. 

MANUSCRIPT  FORM.— (1)  In  preparation  of  copy  follow  the  1972  CBE  Style  Manual, 
third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapters  5 and  6.  (2)  Footnotes  should  be  avoided;  acknowledgments 
as  footnotes  will  not  be  accepted.  (3)  An  informative  abstract  must  be  included  for  all  papers. 
(4)  A Spanish  summary  is  required  for  all  manuscripts  dealing  with  Latin  American  subjects. 
Summaries  in  other  languages  are  not  required  but  are  strongly  recommended.  (5)  A differ- 
ential diagnosis  must  accompany  any  newly  proposed  taxon.  (6)  Submit  two  copies  of  manu- 
script. 

ILLUSTRATIONS. — All  illustrations,  including  maps  and  photographs,  will  be  referred  to 
as  figures.  All  illustrations  should  be  of  sufficient  clarity  and  in  proper  proportions  for  reduc- 
tion to  CONTRIBUTIONS  page  size.  In  preparing  illustrations  and  legends  consult  the  1972 
CBE  Style  Manual,  third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapter  5.  Submit  only  illustrations  made  with 
permanent  ink  and  glossy  photographic  prints  of  good  contrast.  Submit  duplicate  copies  of 
all  illustrations.  Original  illustrations  will  be  returned  after  the  manuscript  has  been  published. 

PROOF. — Authors  will  be  sent  galley  proofs  which  should  be  corrected  and  returned  promptly. 
No  changes  or  alterations,  other  than  typesetting  corrections,  will  be  allowed  unless  paid  by 
author.  Requests  for  reprints  may  be  placed  through  the  Editor. 

R.  Edward  Ostermeyer 
Editor 


All  communications  concerning  manuscripts  and  exchange  of  or  purchase  of  publications 
should  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Museum  Publications,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 

Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America  by  Chapman's  Phototypesetting  on  70#  Patina  Book 


FISHES  OF  THE  SANTA  CLARA  RIVER  SYSTEM, 
SOUTHERN  CALIFORNIA1 


By  Michael  A.  Bell2 


Abstract:  The  distribution  of  fishes  within  the  Santa  Clara  River  and  most  of 
its  tributaries  in  which  fishes  were  found  is  described  from  field  observations  and  46 
fish  collections.  Fifteen  species  of  fishes  were  collected,  of  which  five  probably  are 
native  to  the  system.  All  native  species  are  peripheral  freshwater  fishes  so  there  is 
no  evidence  of  faunal  exchange  with  adjacent  river  systems.  Gasterosteus  aculeatus 
and  Gila  orcutti  occurred  at  almost  all  collecting  stations  while  five  species  occurred 
at  only  one.  This  river  system  contains  a high  diversity  of  freshwater  fishes  for  south- 
ern California  streams.  The  Santa  Clara  River  system  is  vulnerable  to  habitat  destruc- 
tion by  urbanization,  and  potential  threats  to  fishes  of  the  system  are  discussed. 


INTRODUCTION 

Although  many  papers  have  discussed  individual  fish  species  from  the  Santa 
Clara  River  system  (Girard  1854;  Hubbs  1967;  Hubbs,  Hubbs  and  Johnson  1943; 
Miller  1960,  1968,  1972,  1973;  Ross  1973;  Smith  1966),  its  fish  fauna  has  not  been 
described  previously.  By  virtue  of  its  proximity  to  Los  Angeles,  this  drainage  currently 
is  subject  to  rapid  urbanization  with  the  attendant  dangers  of  habitat  destruction  and 
pollution.  The  only  known  native  population  of  the  endangered  unarmored  threespine 
stickleback,  Gasterosteus  aculeatus  williamsoni  (Girard),  still  survives  in  this  drain- 
age. This  drainage  also  harbors  some  introduced  fishes  endemic  to  southern  California 
and  some  species  of  game  fishes.  Thus,  it  is  desirable  to  describe  the  fish  fauna  before 
disturbance  of  the  ecosystem  causes  the  elimination  of  some  species.  This  description 
will  serve  in  the  future  as  a base  line  to  assess  the  impact  of  urbanization  on  the  fish 
fauna. 


MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

Forty-six  fish  collections  were  made  at  varying  intervals  from  the  mouth  of  the 
Santa  Clara  River  system  to  as  far  upstream  as  water  existed  except  in  Piru  and  Santa 
Paula  creeks  primarily  between  September  4 and  November  9,  1975  (Fig.  1).  Col- 
lections were  made  in  the  Santa  Clara  River,  Todd  Barranca,  Sespe  Creek,  Piru  Creek 


!Review  Committee  for  this  Contribution 
Robert  J.  Lavenberg 
J.  D.  McPhail 
Robert  R.  Miller 
Camm  C.  Swift 

2Research  Associate  in  Ichthyology,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County,  and  Depart- 
ment of  Biology,  University  of  California,  Los  Angeles,  California  90024. 


2 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  295 


i 


Figure  1.  Map  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  system- showing  the  location  of  collections  (numbers)  and  observations  (letters). 


1978 


Fishes  of  Santa  Clara  River 


3 


and  San  Francisquito  Canyon.  Arrastre  Canyon  and  Santa  Paula  Creek  were  examined 
briefly,  but  no  collections  were  made.  The  original  purpose  of  the  sampling  program 
was  to  determine  the  distribution  of  threespine  stickleback  {Gasterosteus  aculeatus ) 
phenotypes.  This  species  favors  areas  of  low  velocity  flow  so  most  collections  were 
made  in  backwaters,  side  streams,  pools  and  mainstream  margins.  Samples  are  thus 
biased  against  those  species  preferring  rapidly  flowing  water.  For  this  reason,  esti- 
mates of  abundance,  which  may  be  misleading  were  not  made,  and  the  absence  of 
a species  from  a sample  should  be  interpreted  with  caution. 

Collecting  stations  were  selected  for  accessability  and  the  presence  of  suitable 
habitat  for  Gasterosteus . The  position  of  stations  was  determined  in  the  field  using 
local  landmarks,  and  they  were  recorded  on  U.S.G.S.  7.5  minute  series  (topographic) 
maps.  The  distance  of  collection  stations  from  the  mouth  in  the  Santa  Clara  River  and 
from  the  confluence  with  the  Santa  Clara  River  in  tributaries  was  determined  by  step- 
ping off  that  distance  on  the  topographic  maps  using  dividers  set  at  0. 1 km.  Stream 
gradient  was  determined  by  stepping  off  the  distance  between  one  or  two  contour  lines 
up  and  downstream  of  the  station  with  dividers  set  for  500  or  200  feet.  Because  of 
irregularities  in  stream  course,  the  distance  from  the  mouth  or  confluence  tends  to  be 
a slight  underestimate  and  the  gradient  a slight  overestimate  using  this  method. 

Surface  temperature  and  velocity  were  measured  where  the  majority  of  fishes 
was  collected  at  each  station.  Thermometers  were  calibrated  to  within  0.5  C of  the 
freezing  and  boiling  point  of  distilled  water.  Water  temperature  tended  to  vary  with 
the  air  temperature.  Water  velocity  was  determined  by  measuring  the  time  required 
for  a vial  partially  filled  with  water  (so  only  a comer  protruded  above  the  surface)  to 
drift  5 m.  Water  depth,  stream  width,  amount  of  vegetation,  bottom  composition  and 
water  color  were  typical  of  the  habitat,  but  collecting  frequently  extended  across  a 
heterogeneous  segment  of  stream. 

Fishes  were  collected  with  a 10  foot  (3.048  m),  Vs  inch  (3. 175  mm)  mesh  knitted 
nylon  seine.  The  collecting  effort  usually  varied  inversely  with  the  abundance  of  Gas- 
terosteus. Specimens  were  fixed  in  10%  formalin  and  transferred  to  50%  isopropyl 
alcohol  4 to  10  days  after  collection.  Eddy  (1957),  Kimsey  and  Fisk  (1960),  Robins 
and  Miller  (1957)  and  Smith  (1966)  were  useful  for  identification.  The  current  sci- 
entific and  common  names  were  verified  in  Baily  (1970).  All  collections  were  de- 
posited in  the  fish  collection  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County 
(LACM).  These  are  station  1,  LACM  34071,  station  2 to  44,  LACM  34198  to  34240 
respectively,  station  45,  LACM  35228,  and  station  46,  LACM  34241.  LACM  35227 
also  came  from  station  31  and  LACM  35648  was  collected  near  station  30.  Additional 
specimens  from  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences  Fish  Collection  (CAS)  were  ex- 
amined to  verify  early  collection  records  (CAS  20283,  CAS  20284  and  CAS  Acc. 
No.  X:30). 

I attempted  to  determine  whether  species  presently  occuring  in  or  previously  re- 
ported from  the  Santa  Clara  River  system  were  native  or  introduced.  This  is  a rela- 
tively simple  task  for  species  known  to  be  introduced  from  distant  sources,  but  those 
native  to  southern  California  present  a problem.  One  must  depend  on  historical  rec- 
ords, distribution  patterns,  the  original  presence  of  appropriate  habitats  and  the  exis- 
tence of  dispersal  routes  for  entry  into  the  system.  Only  negative  historical  data  can 


4 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  295 


be  brought  forth  to  support  the  hypothesis  that  a species  is  introduced.  The  failure  of 
a species  to  be  observed  or  collected  (negative  data)  until  recent  times  may  be  a result 
of  recent  introduction  or  from  erroneous  observation,  identification  or  incomplete  col- 
lection in  the  past.  Even  if  there  is  a record  of  introduction,  the  species  may  already 
have  been  present  before  the  introduction.  The  confidence  placed  in  the  conclusion 
based  on  historical  data  that  a species  is  introduced  depends  on  the  quality  of  the 
original  observation.  Reasoning  based  on  distribution  patterns,  the  presence  of  ap- 
propriate habitats  and  dispersal  routes  is  inferential.  Fishes  do  not  always  occur  in 
habitats  that  they  can  disperse  into  and  that  appear  to  be  appropriate  for  them.  Thus, 
as  much  evidence  as  possible  must  be  brought  to  bear  on  the  question  of  whether  a 
fish  species  is  native,  and  the  answer  obtained  may  never  be  satisfactory. 

RESULTS 

Description  of  Streams 

The  Santa  Clara  River  system  is  composed  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  and  a large 
number  of  tributaries  primarily  draining  from  the  north  (Fig.  1).  The  drainage  is 
bounded  on  the  southwest  by  the  Santa  Susana  Mountains  and  on  the  southeast  by  the 
San  Gabriel  Mountains.  No  substantial  tributaries  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  drain  these 
mountain  ranges.  The  Santa  Susana  Mountains  are  drained  to  the  south  by  Calleguas 
Creek  and  its  tributaries.  The  southern  slope  of  the  San  Gabriel  Mountains  is  drained 
by  tributaries  of  the  Los  Angeles  and  San  Gabriel  Rivers. 

In  the  west,  the  headwaters  of  Sespe  and  Piru  creeks  are  interdigitated  with  those 
of  the  Cuyama  River,  a tributary  of  the  Santa  Marie  River  and  tributaries  of  the  small 
Ventura  River  system. 

Drainage  north  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  system  is  by  creeks  which  eventually 
disappear  into  the  southern  San  Joaquin  Valley.  The  eastern  comer  of  the  Santa  Clara 
River  system  is  bounded  by  these  creeks  as  well  as  those  of  the  Los  Angeles  River 
system  and  some  draining  into  the  Mojave  desert. 

The  Santa  Clara  River,  Santa  Paula,  Sespe,  Piru  and  Castaic  creeks,  San  Fran- 
cisquito  and  Arrastre  canyons  and  Todd  Barranca  were  studied.  Other  tributaries  east 
of  Saugus  were  not  studied  because  J.  N.  Baskin  (personal  communication)  reported 
no  fishes  there.  Some  tributaries  in  the  western  portion  of  the  drainage  could  not  be 
studied  or  received  cursory  examination  because  of  limitations  of  time,  funds  or 
access. 

The  Santa  Clara  River  was  examined  from  its  headwaters  to  its  mouth.  Flow  is 
intermittent  over  substantial  lengths  of  the  stream  (dotted  lines,  Fig.  1)  and  the  geo- 
graphic extent  and  duration  of  desiccation  varies  yearly.  The  section  between  Lang 
and  Saugus  is  dry  except  during  heavy  downpours,  a condition  that  apparently  has 
existed  since  at  least  the  middle  of  the  last  century  (Miller  1960).  The  Santa  Clara 
River  and  its  tributaries  are  subject  to  flooding  some  winters.  The  river  flows  through 
a broad,  primarily  sandy -bottomed  valley.  In  most  places,  the  flood  plain  is  lined  by 
earth  and  rock  or  wire  and  debris  barriers.  The  Southern  Pacific  Railroad  runs  the 
length  of  the  Santa  Clara  River,  built  across  the  flood  plain  on  elevated  grades  in 
places.  Upstream  of  Saugus  the  flood  plain  is  occupied  by  gravel  pits,  small  recrea- 


1978 


Fishes  of  Santa  Clara  River 


5 


tional  parks  or  is  undeveloped.  The  Saugus  area  presently  is  undergoing  rapid  urban- 
ization. The  flood  plain,  beginning  just  upstream  of  Piru  Creek,  is  occupied  by  citrus 
orchards,  which  bound  most  of  the  river  on  both  sides  except  for  small  gaps  at  the 
cities  of  Fillmore,  Santa  Paula,  Satacoy  and  Oxnard.  The  Oxnard-Satacoy  region  also 
is  an  area  of  rapid  urban  growth. 

The  first  tributary  studied  was  Todd  Barranca,  a small  stream  that  drains  Wheeler 
Canyon  and  flows  across  the  flood  plain  of  the  Santa  Clara  River,  entering  it  at  Santa 
Paula.  Fishes  were  present  in  the  lower  portion. 

Only  the  lower  kilometer  of  Santa  Paula  Creek,  which  is  enclosed  in  a rock  and 
earth  levee  was  examined  (stat.  C).  No  fishes  were  seen. 

Sespe  Creek  is  a large  tributary  of  the  Santa  Clara  River.  Numerous  small  wa- 
terfalls a few  centimeters  to  more  than  3 m high  occur  from  12  to  17  km  (and  probably 
farther)  upstream  of  the  confluence  with  the  Santa  Clara  River  (stats.  32-35).  Much 
of  the  stream  flows  through  deep,  narrow  canyons  over  rocky  substratum.  Practically 
the  whole  Sespe  Creek  drainage  is  contained  in  Los  Padres  National  Forest  (including 
the  Sespe  Condor  Sanctuary,  where  no  samples  could  be  collected)  and  is  protected 
as  recreational  land  or  wildlife  sanctuary. 

Piru  Creek  is  the  largest  tributary  to  the  Santa  Clara  River.  Flow  volume  fluc- 
tuates according  to  the  amount  of  water  released  from  Lake  Piru  through  Santa  Felicia 
Dam,  and  the  creek  receives  imported  water  from  Pyramid  Reservoir.  The  canyon 
through  which  Piru  creek  flows  in  that  portion  studied  is  broad  and  sandy-bottomed. 
Piru  Creek  is  primarily  within  the  Los  Padres  National  Forest. 

Castaic  Creek  is  located  in  a dry,  broad,  sandy-bottomed  valley.  Castaic  Lake 
is  a reservoir  that  receives  imported  water  from  Pyramid  Reservoir.  The  only  flowing 
water  seen  in  this  creek  during  the  summer  was  water  being  released  from  a small 
impoundment  below  Castaic  Lake  at  station  45. 

San  Francisquito  Canyon  contains  three  areas  of  continuous  flow:  where  it  joins 
the  Santa  Clara  River,  and  at  two  points  upstream.  One  point  upstream  is  where  water 
released  from  Drinkwater  Reservoir  tumbles  out  of  Drinkwater  Canyon  and  flows  for 
about  200  m along  the  bottom  of  San  Francisquito  Canyon  before  sinking  into  the 
sand.  On  February  1,  1976  this  stream  segment  had  increased  to  1400  m long.  Such 
extensions  are  characteristic  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  system  in  the  winter.  The  second 
point  upstream  where  the  stream  flows  is  for  a few  kilometers  below  San  Francisquito 
Powerhouse  No.  1 . The  canyon  bottom  varies  in  width  and  generally  is  dry  and  sandy. 

Arrastre  Canyon  is  one  of  several  canyons  that  converge  to  form  the  headwaters 
of  the  Santa  Clara  River.  A small  flow  descends  the  steep  sandy  bottom  of  this  shallow 
canyon,  sinking  into  the  sand  and  forming  small  pools.  Like  San  Francisquito  Canyon, 
this  is  a remote  and  little  disturbed  canyon. 

Fish  Distributions 

Fifteen  fish  species  were  collected  from  46  collecting  stations.  The  characteristics 
of  these  stations  are  indicated  in  Table  1 . Fishes  collected  are  listed  below  (numbers 
in  parentheses  indicate  the  number  of  stations  at  which  the  species  was  collected): 

Gasterosteus  aculeatus  Linnaeus  Threespine  stickleback  (42) 

Gila  orcutti  (Eigenmann  and  Eigenmann)  Arroyo  Chub  (37) 


6 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  295 


O -O 

3 

<L>  c 
O C 

3 o 
.2  ^ 

73  § 
52 


cx 

p 

<u 

o 

3 

a 


OC 

03 

03 

u 

2 

§ 3 

^ g 

<D  tH 

-C 

S § 
>>  • - 
£ 3 

t3 

2 

-£  c 

C o 

o Tj- 


t:  w 
o > 

O 2 
c 60 

<D  _•' 


2 c “O 

.2  o c 

c/3  o C3 
>>  «5 

J=  a - 
tx  -5  cn 


$ K 
< h 

W Q 

p/  y 
H ^ 
oo  ^ 


iP  ffi 
W ft  —■ 
H £ S 
< w 3 
^ Q 


U 


00  00 

5 g 


2 z 

& * < 

H H 

oo  co 


— \Q 
CN  CO 


O CN 
ol-  ^1- 


c-  o 

in  co 


c-  cn 

CN  '\!- 


ooooooooooooooooo 


\OO\'O^!>'OO\(?^O^00ld1^O 

IT.  ICi  IT,  CD  ITi  I — nq  oo  oo  O CN  CN 

O P P P 


CN  CN  (N  CN  CN 


5 H ? C 

^ c3  ^ 3 

O a P o P 

£ <->  O 


^tcOCNCNcOCNCNcOCN 

CN  cn  P cn  P cn 


CN  CN  CN  CO  CO  CN 
CO~  CN  CN 
CN 


+ + + + + + + + I + + + + + + + + 


i + + 


JU 

<D 

-2 

JD 

cu 

r- 

o 

(U 

3 

m 

3 

o 

o 

r- 

r- 

T3 

id 

3 

3 

O 

<u 

-O 

in 

co 

3 

c 

‘5b 

^5b 

c3 

"5b 

c 

’5b 

‘5b 

•n 

in 

o 

in 

d 

o 

o 

•n 

i— < 

>n 

uu 

o 

o 

in 

co 

co 

CN 

c 

3b 

in 

3b 

n 

CN 

CN 

CO 

<N 

co 

s 

c3 

3b 

CN 

c 

3b 

in 

oo 

3b 

<D 

<U 

> 

<u 

<u 

dJ 

c 

c 

c 

c 

c 

n 

in 

>n 

in 

CO 

'ct 

NO 

o- 

CN 

n 

CO 

co 

NO 

co 

co 

00 

o 

CN 

co 

o 

in 

d 

rf 

NO 

ON 

CN 

co 

CN 

CO 

in 

cNinooinoincNinooooinininoinooin 

— m co  0 )01  — — — r--  -t  CN  0-  CO  — — I"-  — 1 co  co  O- 


'd-incN  — coin^fON— ^r'-NDoococooCNoor-— <o 

CNCNCNCNCNCNCJ— <CNCN-^CNCN  — (N  N ^ (N  CN  M 


— ■^(NOcovOt-'-OcococooO'ol- 

-coi-oocciniScjioONciood 

—i  —i  CNCNCNcOCOcO^|-iONO 


COOiOVD-I^CO^t 

't-HTtC'OOroinh- 

cor^r^avONooo 


' — CN  CO 


ICl'OhOOaO-^CICO'Cf 


IT)  ^ h oo  P o " 
— — — — — cl  cn 


1978 


Fishes  of  Santa  Clara  River 


7 


in 

Tt 

oo 

n 

r- 

ON 

o 

n 

_ 

OO 

'it 

o 

NO 

NO 

ON 

m 

ON 

r- 

ON 

o 



o 

OO 

04 

in 

q 

ON 

04 

NO 

in 

00 

q 

’T- 

in 

NO 

q 

'it 

n 

oo 

o- 

OO 

o- 

OO 

oo 

o- 

OO 

o 

d 

-2 

04 

-2 

d 

d 

d 

04 

ON 

04 

m 

d 

d 

-2 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

o 

d 

o 

-2 

feb 


3 

c 

3 

3 

c - 

£ 

<u 

<U 

£ 3 

O 

Ui 

X 

O 

00 

o 

X 

0> 

5-h 

oo 

o 2h 

3 u 

rj-  (N  ^ <N  04  04 

of 


'it  ^ '3' 
co  cn  r l 
of  of 


in  in  iri  in  ^ ^t 

'd  d d 04  '—i  —i 
of  ri  cn 
of 


— i '=t  Tf  — 1 (N 

ci  of  d of 


3- 

of 


+ + + + + + 


+ + + I + + + + + I 


+ + + + + I I 


+ 


u u u 
r2  r2  r2  m 
3P  3P  3P  ^ 
75b  3>  7>b  ^ 

<D  0)  (U 


3-  q 

ON  vd 

o)  — < 


_n  „ O o 
in  35  rd  ."3  <D 
^ W)  M 6J)  g 


00  00  00  3 
04  <D  <D 
3 3 3 


JjJ  JD  _0> 

3 3 3^2 
*S)  'So  'Sb  ^ ‘Eb 
”ob  "ob  3b  ’-H  3b 

<u  o>  <u  <D 

c c 3 c 


<u 

3 d 

rS  m 0-  no  m <u  x> 

* * * * C2  ^ 

n in  in  m o 

00  m m »n  04  C & 

04  > 


JU 

3 

.2 

c3 

> 


^t 

ON 

04 


m in  oo  ' ^04 

’— ' ^t  m 


in 

m o-  d 


04 

o o-  d -it  m 


in 

<N  ON  m ON  On  O-  NO 


•n 


O o o >n  mo 

o-  m in  —i  h ^ 


ooooooooom 

— NOinoooinm^tNO 


o o o o o o o 
in  m m m <N  in 


o n 

m oi 


O O ’— < On  O on 

<n  04  (N  — < 04  — < 


'-^ooN^-c^-m^-mmo 

(N  (N  -h  OJ  N (N  - 1 — < 


t-  o ^ in  m o-  on 
N (N|  (N  M M (N  ’ — 


in 

04  o4 


c-4  n 04  NO 

g O d d 


no  m Nomor--^cN(NinOON  oo  o m on  in  — 1 o ^ oo  ^ on 

oi  »n  -2doo— ^mdinNOON©  — < oi  m >n  r--  on  oi  • on  oo  in  m 

m -h  °°  o 0-  — < 


oi  m ^t  in 
04  04  04  04 


NO  t — 
04  04 


</) 

04 

c n 


OO  ON  O — < 04 
04  o4  m m m 


n 1-  in  \o  F 
m m m m m 


oo  on  o —i  m m Tj- 

m m tj-  ^t  ^ rt 

3 

• fcl 
CL 


u 

_o 

3 

3 

u 


•n 


8 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  295 


Gambusia  ajfinis  (Baird  and  Girard)  Mosquito  fish  (24) 

Catostomus  (. Pantosteus ) santaanae  (Snyder)  Santa  Ana  sucker  (20) 

Pimephales  promelas  Rafinesque  Fathead  minnow  (15) 

Salmo  gairdneri  Richardson  Rainbow  trout  (5) 

Lepomis  cyanellus  Rafinesque  Green  sunfish  (6) 

Micropterus  salmoides  (Lacepede)  Largemouth  bass  (4) 

Ictalurus  punctatus  (Rafinesque)  Channel  Catfish  (1) 

Cottus  asper  Richardson  Prickly  sculpin  (3) 

Notepiigonus  crysoleucas  (Mitchill)  Golden  shiner  (1) 

Dorosoma  petenense  (Gunther)  Threadfin  shad  (1) 

Eucyclogobius  newberryi  (Girard)  Tidewater  goby  (1) 

Leptocottus  armatus  Girard  Pacific  staghorn  sculpin  (1) 

Lampertra  tridenteta  (Gairdner)  Pacific  lamprey  (2) 

Fish  collection  records  are  summarized  in  Table  2 and  the  locations  of  collection 
stations  are  shown  in  figure  1 . 

Gasterosteus  acculeatus  occurred  in  every  stream  where  fishes  were  found  except 
in  Arrastre  Canyon  and  Castaic  Creek.  It  was  abundant  at  all  stations  where  it  occurred 
except  in  the  Santa  Clara  River  between  Saugus  and  Piru  and  in  the  headwaters  of 
some  tributaries.  This  species  was  collected  by  J.  N.  Baskin  (personal  communication) 
at  my  station  F,  farther  upstream  in  San  Francisquito  Canyon  than  I was  able  to  find 
it. 

Gila  orcutti  penetrates  farther  into  headwaters  than  Gasterosteus . In  addition  to 
being  widespread  in  the  Santa  Clara  River  and  all  tributaries  in  which  fishes  were 
found,  it  was  observed  in  Arrastre  Canyon  (stat.  G)  and  farther  up  San  Francisquito 
Canyon  (stat.  F),  Sespe  Creek  (stat.  D)  and  Piru  Creek  (stats.  43,  44,  E)  than 
Gasterosteus . 

Gambusia  ajfinis,  Catostomus  santaanae  and  Pimephales  promelas  are  all  wide- 
spread in  the  Santa  Clara  River  but  are  restricted  in  some  tributaries.  Gambusia  ajfinis 
apparently  is  absent  above  station  22  in  the  upper  Santa  Clara  River  and  was  not  found 
above  station  30  in  Sespe  Creek  or  station  39  in  Piru  Creek.  Generally  the  absence 
of  Gambusia  is  associated  with  an  increase  in  stream  gradient  (Table  1).  Catostomus 
santaanae  was  absent  from  small  tributaries  like  Todd  Barranca,  San  Francisquito 
Canyon  and  Arrastre  Canyon  and  also  from  the  headwaters  of  Sespe  Creek  (above 
stat.  32).  However,  J.  N.  Baskin  (personal  communication)  found  it  and  Gila  orcutti 
in  isolated  pools  in  Mill  Canyon,  which  joins  the  Santa  Clara  River  near  station  23. 
Pimephales  promelas  has  a more  restricted  distribution.  In  the  Santa  Clara  River,  it 
occurred  below  station  14  and  has  only  entered  the  lower  gradient  portions  of  Sespe 
Creek,  below  station  30.  However,  fathead  minnows  were  seen  above  Lake  Piru  and 
were  collected  in  the  lake,  in  two  stations  downstream  in  Piru  Creek  and  below  Castaic 
Lake. 

The  only  other  widespread  species  is  Lepomis  cyanellus,  which  was  taken  at  six 
disjunct  stations  in  the  Santa  Clara  River,  Todd  Barranca,  Castaic  Creek  and  seen  in 
Sespe  Creek.  It  probably  occurs  elsewhere,  but  may  be  rare  and  difficult  to  collect. 

Other  species  found  in  the  system  are  either  locally  abundant  or  associated  with 
unusual  conditions.  Salmo  gairdneri  lives  in  the  discharge  of  Fillmore  Fish  Hatchery 


Table  2 

Distribution  of  fishes  in  the  Santa  Clara  River  systems.  Symbols:  +,  species  collected;  S,  species  seen,  but  not  collected. 


1978 


Fishes  of  Santa  Clara  River 


9 


H 
< 
f— 1 
00 


mmudpui 

DAjaduwq 


— n m ^in'Ohooo\o~ 


smvuuD 

snuoaoidaq 

l^AAaqMdu 

sinqoSojjfong 

asuaudidd 

VWOSOAOQ 

svjndjOsLi.i 

snuoSiiudjOjq 

Addsv 

snuoj 

smviJund 

snAnjvjjj 

^ sdpiouqvs 

[ ^ snAdidoAJij/\j 

MJ 

kj 

a,  snijduunxj 

siwoda  7 

!AdUpAU?8 

ouqvs 

svjduiOAd 

sdjvqddiuic] 

dDunmuvs 

smuoisojDj 

smgv 

vjsnquivQ 

UIYIDAQ 

VUD 


+ 


+ 


+ 


• • • + + 


+ • + + + + 

••••  + • 

+ + + + + + 

+ + • + + + 


+ 

. ...  GO  • 

+ • + • • + 

+ • + + + + 

+ • • + • + 

+ + + + 00  + 


+ 

• + •+  + + 

+ + + + + + 

+ + • + • • 


smud/ruv 

snaisoAdisnp) 


+ + + + + + + 


+ + + + 


+ + + 


W 1 H 
Oi  =3  < 
H H 
oo  GO 


I 00 


(Nr0'Nj-i/~)\0t-~000''O  — (N  (O  >0  'O  I — OO 


Table  2 (continued) 

Distribution  of  fishes  in  the  Santa  Clara  River  systems.  Symbols:  +,  species  collected;  S,  species  seen,  but  not  collected. 


10 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  295 


H 

<1  on  o — 1 (N  m ^ in  no  c— 

E— I ’ — M (N  (N  N (N  (N  N M 

00 


oo  on  O ' — n 
CN  CN  co  co  co  ro  co 


mmudpm 

DAldduiV^ 


• • + + CO  • • 


snwuuu 

snijojoidaq 

\LudC\A\dU 

sniqoSopXjng 

asuduaidd 

vmosoaoq 

snjnajosxj.i 
snuoSnuaiop  I 

Addsn 

snuoj 

snwiound 
shah /ijjjj 


^ sapioiujDS 

y SyiAdldOADl  p\[ 
kj 

o,  snipuunXj 

situ  oda  7 


+ 


+ 


oo  • • • 


UBUpjwS 

ouqDS 

svpuiOAd 

sdpiqdduup 

DDUDDJUVS 

sniuojsojvj 


+ + + + + + • 


+ + . + 


• + + oo  • • • 

+ + . + co  • • 


smffn 

nisnquwQ 


+ + + + • • • 


pin  da  o 

nUD 


+ +•+  + + + 


snivajnjD 

SUdlSOAdlSVQ 


+ + + + + + + 


+ + ••  + •••• 

+ + + + + + + + + 

+ + + + + + + + + 


ON  o — <N 
— oj  oi  oj 


co 

<N  rj 


no  r- 

<N  (N 


ONO'—oam^t 
cn  co  co  co  co  co 


& 


1978 


Fishes  of  Santa  Clara  River 


11 


oo  ON  O I 
m m ^ 


(N  ro  'st 
"i-  ^ 


••••  + •+  + 


•••  ••••+  + + • 

• • • + 

+ 4 co  • 

...  + +•••  + • + 


+ 


• • • + + 

+ + + •+  + + +•+  • + 

+ + + + + + + +••  • + 


in  \D  h oo  on  O — ' (N  ro 

romro  t I1  ^ 


U 

_o 

"3 

c/D 

03 

u 


*-+ 


Q 

C T 


NO 


PLh 

CO 


12 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  295 


(trout)  and  in  favorable  riffle  and  pool  habitats  of  Sespe  Creek.  It  was  observed  but 
not  collected  above  Lake  Piru  (stat.  E).  Lampetra  tridentata  is  restricted  to  Sespe 
Creek.  One  dead  adult  specimen  was  collected  at  station  31,  one  badly  decomposed 
adult  was  observed  at  station  32  and  D.  L.  Soltz  (personal  communication)  collected 
several  adults  from  near  station  29  in  June  1975.  I also  obtained  two  ammocetes 
(LACM  35648)  at  station  30.  Notemigonus  crysoleucas,  Dorosoma  petenense,  Cottus 
asper  and  Micropterus  salmoides  were  found  mainly  in  the  vicinity  of  Lake  Piru. 
Micropterus  also  was  collected  below  Castaic  Lake  and  in  the  Santa  Clara  River,  5 
km  downstream  of  the  juncture  with  Castaic  Creek  (stat.  14).  It  also  was  observed 
in  private  ponds  along  the  upper  reaches  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  (near  stat.  19)  but 
not  in  the  river.  Cottus  asper  was  found  at  stations  42,  44  and  below  Castaic  Lake 
at  station  45  and  was  observed  at  station  E,  near  Lake  Piru.  Dorosoma  petenense  and 
Notemigonus  crysoleucas  were  collected  only  in  Lake  Piru. 

Eucyclogobius  newberryi  and  Leptocottus  armatus  are  species  that  frequently 
occupy  the  mouths  of  rivers  but  fail  to  penetrate  far  inland.  They  were  taken  only  at 
station  1 . Other  marine  fishes  that  enter  stream  mouths  might  have  been  collected  if 
it  had  been  possible  to  collect  closer  to  the  mouth  of  the  river. 

CONCLUSIONS  AND  DISCUSSION 
Limitations  of  Data 

To  collect  fishes  by  seining  is  at  best  an  incomplete  sampling  method,  although 
it  is  the  most  practical  one  considering  the  large  number  of  samples  and  the  limited 
resources  available  to  make  collections.  The  distributions  here  presented  are  based  on 
a series  of  collections  made  mostly  during  a short  time  span,  obtained  from  a varying 
number  of  seine  hauls,  generally  from  slow  moving  to  still  water  because  sampling 
of  sticklebacks  was  the  primary  objective.  Seining  is  not  ideal  to  obtain  a complete 
representation  of  the  distribution  of  diverse  fishes.  Some  species  may  have  been 
overlooked  because  special  collecting  techniques  are  required  for  capture.  For  in- 
stance, Lampetra  tridentata  was  found  in  Sespe  Creek  only  by  making  a special  trip 
to  look  for  adults  during  the  spawning  season.  Rarer  species,  such  as  Lepomis  cy- 
anellus,  might  have  been  collected  at  more  stations  if  collecting  had  been  more  in- 
tense. Abundance  or  distribution  of  some  species  varies  seasonally  and  these  species 
would  have  occurred  at  more  stations  had  they  been  sampled  year  round.  Thus,  the 
results  of  these  collections  are  minimal  measures  of  species  diversity  and  distribution 
in  the  Santa  Clara  River. 


Native  Fishes 

Of  the  15  fishes  collected,  Gasterosteus  aculeatus,  Eucyclogobius  newberryi, 
Leptocottus  armatus,  Salmo  gairdneri  and  Lampetra  tridentata  are  native.  Gasterosteus 
acculeatus  was  found  in  the  headwaters  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  near  Acton  during 
surveys  for  a Pacific  railroad  route  in  the  middle  1800’s  (Miller  1960).  This  form  was 
described  as  Gasterosteus  williamsoni  by  Girard  (1854)  from  “Williamson’s  Pass,” 
now  known  as  Soledad  Canyon  (Miller  1960).  Sticklebacks  were  present  in  the  area 


1978 


Fishes  of  Santa  Clara  River 


13 


now  occupied  by  the  Santa  Clara  River  system  as  early  as  the  Pliocene  (David  1945; 
Bell  1973).  Miller  (1968)  stated  that  Gasterosteus  aculeatus  was  the  only  fish  orig- 
inally present  in  the  Santa  Clara  River  system.  It  appears  to  be  native  to  most  of  the 
system  and  in  1947  was  collected  in  San  Francisquito  Canyon  (CAS  20284)  where 
it  may  or  may  not  be  native.  Two  subspecies  of  G.  aculeatus  have  been  recognized 
from  this  drainage  (Miller  and  Hubbs  1969):  G.  A.  williamsoni,  mostly  upstream  of 
Saugus,  and  G.  a.  microcephalus  from  the  headwaters  of  Sespe  Creek.  Intergrades 
between  these  two  subspecies  occupy  much  of  the  remainder  of  the  drainage  (Bell 
1976). 

Hubbs  (1946)  reported  large  and  consistent  runs  of  Salmo  gairdneri  into  the  Santa 
Clara  River.  Sespe  Creek  between  stations  31  and  35  is  high  gradient  and  consists  of 
riffles  and  pools.  Although  water  temperauture  is  near  the  upper  limits  for  Salmo 
during  the  summer,  they  still  are  abundant.  Thus,  Salmo  almost  certainly  is  native  to 
Sespe  Creek.  Piru  Creek  and  the  Santa  Clara  River  are  much  less  suitable  for  S. 
gairdneri.  Rainbow  trout  are  restricted  to  a few  deep  spots  in  the  generally  shallow 
Piru  Creek.  California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  records  indicate  that  S.  gairdneri 
has  been  planted  in  Piru  Creek  since  at  least  1931,  and  these  may  be  the  original 
source  of  trout  observed  at  station  E.  Those  observed  at  station  11  in  the  Santa  Clara 
River  certainly  had  escaped  from  the  Fillmore  Hatchery  just  upstream  of  the  station. 
Although  they  were  very  abundant  in  the  artificially  cooled  water  flowing  out  of  the 
hatchery,  they  were  absent  3 km  downstream  at  station  10. 

Eucyclogohius  newberryi  and  Leptocottus  armatus  are  euryhaline  species  that 
have  entered  the  Santa  Clara  River  from  the  sea.  There  is  no  reason  to  believe  that 
they  are  introduced. 

A fifth  native  species  is  Lampetra  tridentata  (placed  in  this  genus  by  Hubbs 
1971),  the  Pacific  lamprey.  Hubbs  (1967)  reported  on  three  specimens  from  Sespe 
Creek  about  3 miles  north  of  Fillmore  (near  stats.  30  and  31). 

The  native  fishes  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  system  have  one  thing  in  common, 
they  all  are  either  anadromous  or  peripheral  freshwater  fishes.  Peripheral  freshwater 
fishes  are  those  restricted  to  freshwater  immediately  adjacent  to  the  sea  and  the  dis- 
tributions of  which  are  the  result  of  dispersal  through  the  sea  (Darlington  1957), 
whereas  anadromous  fishes  spend  a portion  of  their  life  cycle  in  marine  water  but 
enter  fresh  water  to  spawn.  Thus,  all  native  fishes  could  have  entered  the  Santa  Clara 
River  system  from  the  sea  and  there  is  no  evidence  that  there  has  been  any  exchange 
between  the  ichthyofauna  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  system  and  those  of  adjacent  river 
systems. 

California  Fishes  Introduced 
to  the  Santa  Clara  River  System 

Miller  (1968)  listed  three  fish  species  from  California  which  have  been  introduced 
to  the  Santa  Clara  River  system.  Rhinichthys  osculus  (Girard),  the  speckled  dace,  is 
native  to  Santa  Ana  River  system  (Culver  and  Hubbs  1917),  San  Luis  Obispo  Creek 
(based  on  Jordan  1894)  and  other  coastal  streams  north  of  the  latter.  Miller  (1968) 
commented  on  the  disjunct  distribution  of  this  species  but  concluded  that  it  was  in- 
troduced to  the  Santa  Clara  River  system.  I did  not  collect  this  species  there.  Another 


14 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  295 


native  to  the  Santa  Ana  River  system,  Catostomus  ( Pantosteus ) santaanae  (Snyder 
1908),  apparently  is  introduced  to  the  Santa  Clara  River  system.  Miller  (1968:175) 
concluded  that  the  Santa  Ana  sucker  is  introduced  based  on  the  testimony  of  “An  old 
resident  of  that  drainage.  . . ” that  a fish  (i.e.,  Gasterosteus  aculeatus)  . . about 
2 or  3 inches  long,  that  swam  in  a jerky  fashion  and  curled  its  tail  when  at  rest.”  was 
the  only  species  originally  present.  Catostomus  santaanae  had  been  introduced  to  the 
Santa  Clara  River  by  1934,  when  it  also  was  found  in  Piru  Creek  (R.  R.  Miller  per- 
sonal communication).  It  was  abundant  in  the  Santa  Clara  River  between  Piru  and 
Fillmore,  and  in  the  lower  reaches  of  Sespe  Creek  by  1940  (Hubbs  et  al.  1943).  Hubbs 
et  al.  (1943)  reported  another  unidentified  Catostomus  of  the  subgenus  Catostomus 
and  numerous  hybrids  between  it  and  Catostomus  santaanae  collected  between  1939 
and  1942.  Smith  (1966)  stated  that  C.  santaanae  from  the  Santa  Clara  River  drainage 
has  features  indicating  introgression  by  a sucker  of  the  subgenus  Catostomus  (i.e., 
papillae  on  the  anterior  face  of  the  upper  lip).  The  source  of  the  second  species  of 
Catostomus  was  unknown  to  Hubbs  el  al.  (1943),  but  it  is  referred  to  the  Owens 
sucker,  Catostomus  fumeiventris  Miller  (1973)  in  his  synonomy  of  that  species.  It 
apparently  was  introduced  by  a release  of  Owens  River  water  from  the  Los  Angeles 
Aqueduct.  Owens  suckers  are  endemic  to  the  Owens  River  basin  but  have  been  in- 
troduced to  June  Lake  in  Mono  basin  and  the  Santa  Clara  River  drainage  (Miller, 
1973).  I detected  neither  C . fumeiventris  nor  its  hybrids  and  backcrosses  with  Catos- 
tomus santaanae  in  my  samples,  but  other  recent  surveys  have  reported  them  to  be 
present  (A.  W.  Wells  and  J.  S.  Diana  personal  communication). 

Gila  orcutti  is  the  third  California  species  that  has  been  introduced  to  the  Santa 
Clara  River  system.  Miller  (1968)  also  concluded  that  this  species  was  introduced 
because  of  the  report  that  Gasterosteus  aculeatus  was  the  only  native  fish.  Gila  orcutti 
is  native  to  many  streams  from  San  Luis  Rey  River  (Riverside  County)  north  to  Malibu 
Creek  (Los  Angeles  County)  (Miller  1968).  This  species  was  first  collected  in  the 
Santa  Clara  River  in  1934  (Miller  1968)  when  it  also  was  found  in  Piru  Creek  (R.  R. 
Miller  personal  communication).  Arroyo  chubs  were  collected  in  San  Francisquito 
Canyon  in  1947  (CAS  20253),  and  they  are  now  the  most  widespread  fish  in  the 
system. 

Cottus  asper  ranges  south  to  Ventura  County  (Eddy  1957),  and  it  has  been  col- 
lected in  the  Ventura  River  (R.  R.  Miller  personal  communication)  which  enters  the 
Pacific  Ocean  just  north  of  the  Santa  Clara  River.  Prickly  sculpins  were  found  only 
in  the  vicinity  of  Lake  Piru  (stats.  42,  44,  E)  and  Castaic  Lake  (stat.  45)  but  nowhere 
else.  R.  R.  Miller  sampled  Piru  Creek  several  times  since  1934  without  collecting  C. 
asper  (R.  R.  Miller  personal  communication).  Both  Lake  Piru  and  Castaic  Lake  re- 
ceive water  from  Pyramid  Reservoir  which  receives  its  water  from  the  Sacramento 
and  San  Joaquin  River  drainages.  C.  asper  occurs  in  the  Sacramento  River  (Evermann 
and  Clark  1931)  and  this  is  probably  the  original  source  of  all  Cottus  in  the  Santa 
Clara  River  system. 

Other  Fishes  Introduced 
to  the  Santa  Clara  River  System 

Other  fishes  found  in  the  Santa  Clara  River  system  are  not  native  to  California. 
Pimephales  promelas  first  was  collected  in  California  in  1950  and  since  has  been 


1978 


Fishes  of  Santa  Clara  River 


15 


introduced  to  many  waters  (Shapovalov,  Dill  and  Cordone  1959).  Gambusia  ajfnis 
was  introduced  to  California  in  1922  and  has  become  widespread  for  mosquito  control 
(Miller  1961).  Lepomis  cyanellus  probably  was  introduced  with  bluegill  (Lepomis 
macrochirus  Rafinesque)  which  it  resembles  when  it  is  small  (Evermann  and  Clark 
1931).  Ictalurus  punctatus  was  first  introduced  to  California  in  1895  (Evermann  and 
Clark  1931)  and  has  been  introduced  widely.  Ictalurus  me  las  (Rafinesque),  the  black 
bullhead,  was  reported  from  near  station  17  by  J.  N.  Baskin  (personal  communica- 
tion), but  I did  not  collect  it  anywhere  in  the  system. 

Two  fishes  associated  with  Lake  Piru  probably  were  introduced  there  as  forage 
species  for  Micropterus  salmoides,  which  was  introduced  for  sport  fishing.  One,  Do- 
rosoma  petenense,  was  introduced  to  California  in  1953  because  it  is  suited  to  the 
warm  fluctuating  waters  of  reservoirs  (Kimsey  1954).  The  other,  Notemigonus  cry- 
soleucas,  was  reported  in  small  creeks  near  San  Diego  by  Evermann  and  Clark  (1931) 
and  since  has  been  introduced  to  many  reservoirs. 

Distribution  Patterns 

Threespine  sticklebacks  and  Arroyo  chubs  are  the  most  widespread  fishes  in  the 
Santa  Clara  River  system.  Native  Gasterosteus  aculeatus  are  found  throughout  the 
drainage  wherever  there  is  slowly  moving  water,  except  in  the  smallest  headwaters. 
However,  introduced  Gila  orcutti  is  more  widespread,  occurring  farther  upstream  than 
the  native  stickleback.  Gila  orcutti  has  dispersed  well  probably  because  it  is  native 
to  small  coastal  streams  similar  to  the  Santa  Clara  River  system  and  can  withstand 
a stronger  current  than  can  Gasterosteus  (J.  N.  Baskin  personal  communication).  But 
another  coastal  stream  fish,  Catostomus  ( Pantosteus ) santaanae,  apparently  is  not 
sustained  by  the  smaller  flows  (i.e.,  Arrastre  Canyon,  San  Francisquito  Canyon  and 
Todd  Barranca)  and  has  not  penetrated  above  the  low  falls  in  Sespe  Creek  (stat.  32). 

Three  other  introduced  fishes,  though  widespread,  have  not  penetrated  higher 
gradient  tributaries.  Gambusia  ajfinis  is  present  in  the  stream  margins  and  pools  of 
low  gradient  areas  but  apparently  has  not  become  established  in  some  of  the  steeper 
tributaries.  Mosquitofish  have  entered  the  upper  Santa  Clara  River  but  have  not  spread 
to  its  higher  reaches.  Pimephales  promelas  is  restricted  to  low  gradient  portions  of 
the  system  except  Piru  Creek  and  below  Castaic  Lake.  In  Piru  Creek,  it  was  found 
in  Lake  Piru  and  upstream  (stat.  E)  and  downstream  (stats.  38,  39)  of  the  lake.  Fathead 
minnows  also  occur  at  most  stations  in  the  Santa  Clara  River  downstream  of  station 
14  and  only  have  penetrated  a short  distance  up  Sespe  Creek  (stat.  31).  The  distri- 
bution of  P.  promelas  indicates  that  it  may  have  been  introduced  in  imported  water, 
but  unlike  Cottus  asper,  successfully  has  dispersed.  R.  R.  Miller  (personal  commu- 
nication) over  several  years  of  collecting  never  obtained  fathead  minnows  from  Piru 
Creek,  supporting  the  view  that  it  was  introduced  recently. 

Native  species  such  as  Salmo  gairdneri,  Lampetra  tridentata,  Eucyclogobius 
newberryi  and  Leptocottus  armatus  only  are  found  in  geographically  restricted  habi- 
tats. Salmo  gairdneri  was  found  in  cooler  (stat.  11)  and  higher  gradient  (stats.  32  to 
37)  water  (Table  1).  Lampetra  tridentata  is  restricted  to  the  unique  riffle  and  pool 
habitat  of  Sespe  Creek.  Eucyclogobius  newberryi  and  Leptocottus  armatus  were  found 
only  at  station  1 , near  the  sea. 

Notemigonus  crysoleucas,  Dorosoma  petenense  and  Micropterus  salmoides  ap- 


16 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  295 


parently  were  introduced  to  Lake  Piru  and  with  the  exception  of  the  latter,  are  found 
only  there.  Dorosoma  petenense  is  a fragile  fish  (Kimsey  1954),  which  probably  could 
not  survive  in  the  small  streams  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  system.  Notemigonus  cry- 
soleucas  also  frequents  quiet  waters  (Hubbs  and  Lagler  1952).  Micropterus  salmoides 
favors  sluggish  waters  also  (Hubbs  and  Lagler  1952).  Specimens  at  station  14  in  the 
Santa  Clara  River,  which  is  typical  stream  habitat,  may  have  been  washed  down  from 
Castaic  Lake. 

The  distribution  of  Qottus  asper  can  be  easily  explained.  It  was  found  just  above 
and  below  Lake  Piru  and  below  Castaic  Lake  and  apparently  was  introduced  in  im- 
ported water  (see  above).  It  may  be  such  a recent  arrival  in  the  drainage  that  it  has 
not  dispersed.  High  water  temperature  and  other  adverse  habitat  characteristics  may 
retard  or  limit  its  ultimate  distribution. 

Vulnerability  of  the  Ichthyofauna 

The  Santa  Clara  River  system  includes  diverse  aquatic  habitats  ranging  from  high 
gradient  streams  to  sluggish,  meandering  streams  with  ponds  and  swampy  areas. 
These  diverse  habitats  support  at  least  15  species  of  fishes  which  are  threatened  by 
human  activities.  One  problem  is  the  increase  of  the  human  population  centering 
around  Saugus.  Human  population  growth  probably  will  increase  habitat  destruction, 
stream  pollution,  introduction  of  aquatic  species,  ground  water  exploitation  and  public 
pressure  to  channelize  streams  in  the  drainage.  Another  problem  is  the  storage  of  im- 
ported water  within  the  drainage. 

Salmo  gaireneri  is  probably  immune  to  human  disturbance  because  it  is  practi- 
cally restricted  to  Los  Padres  National  Forest.  However,  other  fishes  are  more  vul- 
nerable because  they  are  either  found  primarily  in  the  Santa  Clara  River  and  lower 
portions  of  tributaries  that  are,  for  the  most  part,  outside  of  the  national  forest  or  pass 
through  this  part  of  the  drainage  during  spawning  runs  (i.e.,  Lampetra  tridentata). 
This  part  of  the  drainage,  from  about  the  town  of  Piru  to  the  sea,  is  occupied  by  citrus 
groves  that  seem  to  be  compatible  with  the  survival  of  fish  populations.  However,  in 
some  places,  water  draining  from  the  citrus  orchards  has  left  a residue  of  silt.  It  is 
possible  that  fertilizers  and  pesticides  also  are  being  washed  out  of  the  orchards, 
though  there  is  no  evidence. 

While  the  citrus  orchards  along  much  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  afford  some  pro- 
tection for  the  fish  fauna,  urbanization  rapidly  is  spreading  near  Saugus  (between  stats. 
16  and  17)  and  in  the  Oxnard-Satacoy  area  (near  stats.  1 and  2).  Urban  growth  in. the 
vicinity  of  Saugus  already  has  produced  some  pressure  to  channelize  parts  of  the  Santa 
Clara  River  drainage.  On  December  11,  1972,  a hearing  was  held  in  Newhall,  Cal- 
ifornia where  the  U.S.  Army  Corps  of  Engineers  proposed  channelization  of  about 
46  km  (26.5  miles)  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  system.  This  proposal  included  chan- 
nelization of  about  18  km  of  river  between  Saugus  and  Lang,  a generally  dry  stretch 
of  river.  This  proposed  project  would  not  result  in  the  direct  destruction  of  fish  hab- 
itats, but  resultant  increased  runoff  would  have  unpredictable  consequences  for  hab- 
itats downstream.  If  the  proposed  concrete-lined  channel  were  constructed,  continuous 
water  flow  between  the  upper  and  lower  portions  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  might  result. 
Continuous  flow  might  allow  movement  of  fishes  across  this  area,  allowing  increased 


1978 


Fishes  of  Santa  Clara  River 


17 


introgression  of  the  endangered  subspecies,  Gasterosteus  aculeatus  williamsoni  (Miller 
1972;  California  Fish  and  Game  Code  Sec.  2050  to  2055),  by  G.  a.  microcephalus 
(unpublished  data).  G.  a.  williamsoni  is  a distinct  subspecies  divergent  from  other 
Gasterosteus  (Ross  1973;  Bell  1976)  and  its  introgression  would  constitute  destruction 
of  an  unusual  subspecies  that  is  protected  by  federal  and  state  laws.  Channelization 
also  might  allow  other  fishes  to  invade  the  upper  Santa  Clara  River. 

Extension  of  channelization  into  the  range  of  Gasterosteus  aculeatus  williamsoni 
probably  would  result  in  its  extinction  in  the  Santa  Clara  River  (J.  N.  Baskin  personal 
communication).  An  example  of  the  effect  of  channelization  can  be  seen  in  the  lower 
part  of  Santa  Paula  Creek.  Santa  Paula  Creek  at  station  C is  comparable  in  gradient 
(1.54%)  to  Todd  Barranca  at  stations  26  and  27.  Yet  three  or  four  species  of  fishes 
(including  Gasterosteus  aculeatus ) live  in  the  habitat  of  the  latter  two  stations  whereas 
in  the  channelized  portion  of  Santa  Paula  Creek  there  are  no  fishes. 

Another  threat  to  the  fishes  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  is  the  introduction  of  or- 
ganisms that  adversely  affect  fishes.  The  probability  of  such  introductions  is  increased 
by  greater  human  population  density  through  release  of  bait  and  aquarium  pets.  Xen- 
opus  laevis,  the  African  clawed  frog,  discovered  by  J.  N.  Baskin  (personal  commu- 
nication) within  the  Santa  Clara  River  drainage,  probably  was  introduced  by  the  re- 
lease of  pets  and  is  considered  to  be  a threat  to  fishes  (St.  Amant,  Hoover  and  Stewart 
1973).  Aquatic  organisms  also  may  be  introduced  to  the  drainage  with  imported  water. 
Introgression  of  Catostomus  santaanae  by  Catostomus  fumeiventris  apparently  re- 
sulted from  the  release  of  imported  Owens  River  water.  The  storage  of  imported  water 
recently  has  increased  within  the  Santa  Clara  River  basin.  Pyramid  Reservoir  began 
to  fill  on  January  6,  1972  and  water  immediately  was  released  from  it  into  Piru  Creek. 
Any  fishes  that  have  survived  passage  through  pumping  and  power  plants  en  route 
to  Pyramid  Reservoir  may  colonize  the  Santa  Clara  River.  I suggested  above  that 
Cottus  asper  and  Pimephales  promelas  may  have  been  introduced  by  this  means. 
Colonization  by  other  species  may  result  in  the  introgression  of  Gasterosteus  aculea- 
tus, Gila  orcutti  and  Catostomus  santaanae,  which  are  known  to  hybridize  with  con- 
familial  species  in  nature  (Hagen  1967;  Greenfield  and  Greenfield  1972;  Hubbs  et  al. 
1943).  New  introductions  also  may  compete  with  fishes  already  present  in  the 
drainage. 

An  estimate  of  the  impact  of  urban  growth  and  channelization  may  be  obtained 
by  examining  the  ichthyofauna  of  the  Los  Angeles  Basin.  Culver  and  Hubbs  (1917) 
reported  the  presence  of  Lampetra  tridentata,  Gasterosteus  aculeatus  williamsoni, 
Salmo  gairdneri,  Gila  orcutti,  Rhinichthys  osculus  and  Catostomus  santaanae  in  the 
basin.  Since  1917,  most  low  gradient  portions  of  the  drainage  have  been  urbanized, 
most  of  the  streams  have  been  channelized  and  several  fishes  have  been  introduced. 
Between  1929  and  1942  Gasterosteus  aculeatus  williamsoni,  which  previously  was 
abundant  throughout  the  system  (Culver  and  Hubbs  1971),  became  extinct  in  the  basin 
(Miller  1961).  Miller  (1961)  attributed  this  extinction  to  the  introduction  of  Gambusia 
affinis.  However,  mosquitofish  coexist  with  G.  a.  williamsoni  in  the  Santa  Clara 
River,  so  its  disappearance  from  the  Los  Angeles  Basin  probably  was  not  caused 
solely  by  the  introduction  of  Gambusia.  Miller  (1961)  also  cited  the  deterioration  of 
surface  flow  as  a contributory  factor  in  the  disappearance  of  G.  a.  williamsoni,  and 


18 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  295 


this  may  have  been  critical.  Recent  efforts  to  collect  Lampetra  tridentata  in  the  Los 
Angeles  Basin  also  have  failed,  and  this  species  probably  is  extinct  there  (C.  C.  Swift 
personal  communication).  The  other  four  species  listed  by  Culver  and  Hubbs  (1917) 
have  persisted  with  much  reduced  ranges,  although  the  presence  of  Catostomus  san- 
taanae  is  questionable.  Thus,  the  condition  of  the  fish  fauna  of  the  Los  Angeles  Basin 
does  not  inspire  optimism  for  the  future  of  the  fishes  of  the  Santa  Clara  River  system. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

C.  Mahler,  R.  Putnam,  D.  L.  Soltz  and  T.  Webber  assisted  in  field  work.  C. 
C.  Swift  verified  some  identifications  (for  which  I bear  full  responsibility)  and  pro- 
vided stimulation  and  assistance.  A.  J.  Cordone  kindly  allowed  me  to  examine  Cal- 
ifornia Department  of  Fish  and  Game  records.  W.  N.  Eschmeyer  allowed  me  to  ex- 
amine specimens  under  his  care  in  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences.  J.  N.  Baskin, 
E.  C.  Olson  and  C.  C.  Swift  offered  constructive  comments  on  the  manuscript.  I 
thank  B.  M.  Bell,  my  wife,  who  participated  in  most  of  the  collecting  and  without 
whom  this  research  would  have  been  impossible. 

Personal  communications  from  J.  N.  Baskin  are  based  on  his  1974  report,  “Sur- 
vey of  the  Unarmored  Threespine  Stickleback  (i Gasterosteus  aculeatus  williamsoni ) 
in  the  Upper  Santa  Clara  River  Drainage.”  (Unpublished  final  report  for  Bureau  of 
Sport  Fisheries  and  Wildlife  Contract  No.  14- 16-001 -5387SE.  iv  + 67  p.)  The  per- 
sonal communication  from  A.  W.  Wells  and  J.  S.  Diana  is  based  on  their  1975  report, 
“Survey  of  the  Freshwater  Fishes  and  Their  Habitats  in  the  Coastal  Drainages  of 
Southern  California.”  (Unpublished  final  report  for  California  Department  of  Fish  and 
Game  Contract  No.  AB-26.  vi  + 364  p.)  I thank  them  for  permitting  me  to  cite  their 
unpublished  data. 

C.  L.  Hubbs  and  R.  R.  Miller  were  invaluable  sources  of  unpublished  infor- 
mation, and  I have  depended  extensively  on  their  published  and  unpublished  records. 

This  research  was  supported  in  part  by  the  Theodore  Roosevelt  Memorial  Fund; 
University  of  California,  Los  Angeles  Graduate  Student  Patent  Fund  No.  4-403828- 
08613-3;  Bureau  of  Sport  Fisheries  and  Wildlife  Contract  No.  14-16-001-5387SE  to 
J.  N.  Baskin,  Biological  Sciences  Department,  California  State  Polytechnic  Univer- 
sity; the  Section  of  Ichthyology,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County, 
and  R.  Bell,  my  mother. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Bailey,  R.  M.,  Chairman.  1970.  A list  of  common  and  scientific  names  of  fishes  from  the 
United  States  and  Canada,  third  edition.  Amer.  Fish.  Soc.  Spec.  Publ.  6:1-150. 

Bell,  M.  A.  1973.  The  Pliocene  stickleback,  Pungitius  haynesi,  a junior  synonym  of  Gaster- 
osteus aculeatus.  Copeia  1973:  588-590. 

— . 1976.  The  evolution  of  phenotypic  diversity  in  threespine  sticklebacks  ( Gasterosteus 

aculeatus).  Ph.  D.  Dissertation,  University  of  California,  Los  Angeles,  xviii  -I-  192  p. 
Culver,  G.  B.  and  C.  L.  Hubbs.  1917.  The  fishes  of  the  Santa  Ana  system  of  streams  in 
southern  California.  Lorquinia  1:82-83. 


1978 


Fishes  of  Santa  Clara  River 


19 


Darlington,  P.  J.,  Jr.  1957.  Zoogeography:  the  geographical  distribution  of  animals.  John 
Wiley  and  Sons,  New  York,  xi  + 675  p. 

David,  L.  R.  1945.  A Neogene  stickleback  from  the  Ridge  Formation  of  California.  Jour.  Pa- 
leont.  19:315-318. 

Eddy,  S.  1957.  How  to  know  the  freshwater  fishes.  Brown  Co.  Publ. , Debuque,  Iowa.  253  P. 

Evermann,  B.  W.  and  H.  W.  Clark.  1931.  A distributional  list  of  the  species  of  freshwater 
fishes  known  to  occur  in  California.  Div.  Fish  Game  California,  Fish  Bull.  35:1-67. 

Girard,  C.  1854.  Descriptions  of  new  fishes,  collected  by  Dr.  A.  L.  Heermann,  naturalist 
attached  to  the  survey  of  the  Pacific  railroad  route,  under  Lieut.  R.  S.  Williamson,  U.S.A. 
Proc.  Acad.  Natur.  Sci.  Philadelphia  7:129-142. 

Greenfield,  D.  W.  and  T.  Greenfield.  1972.  Introgressive  hybridization  between  Gila  or- 
cutti  and  Hesperoleucus  symmetricus  (Pisces:  Cyprinidae)  in  the  Cuyama  River  basin,  Cal- 
ifornia: I.  Meristics,  morphometries  and  breeding.  Copeia  1972:849-859. 

Hagen,  D.  W.  1967.  Isolating  mechanisms  in  threespine  sticklebacks  ( Gasterosteus ).  Jour.  Fish. 
Res.  Bd.  Canada  24:1637-1692. 

Hubbs,  C.  L.  1946.  Wandering  of  pink  salmon  and  other  salmonid  fishes  in  southern  California. 
California  Fish  Game  32:81-86. 

. 1967.  Occurrence  of  the  Pacific  lamprey,  Entosphenus  tridentatus,  off  Baja  California 

and  in  streams  of  southern  California  with  remarks  on  its  nomenclature.  Trans.  San  Diego 
Soc.  Natur.  Hist.  14:303-311. 

. 1971.  Lampetra  {Entosphenus)  lathophaga,  new  species,  the  nonparasitic  derivitive  of 

the  Pacific  lamprey.  Trans.  San  Diego  Soc.  Natur.  Hist.  16:125-163. 

Hubbs,  C.  L...  L.  C.  Hubbs  and  R.  E.  Johnson.  1943.  Hybridization  in  nature  between  species 
of  catostomid  fishes.  Contrib.  Lab.  Vert.  Biol.,  Univ.  Michigan  22:1-76. 

Hubbs,  C.  L.  and  K.  F.  Lagler.  1952.  Fishes  of  the  Great  Lakes  region.  Cranbrook  Inst. 
Sci.  Bull.  No.  26,  xi  + 186  p. 

Jordan,  D.  S.  1894.  Notes  on  the  fresh-water  fishes  of  San  Luis  Obispo  County,  California. 
Bull.  U.S.  Fish  Comm.  14:141-142. 

Kimsey,  J.  B.  1954.  The  introduction  of  redeye  black  bass  and  the  threadfin  shad  into  California. 
California  Fish  Game  40:203-204. 

Kimsey,  J.  B.  and  L.  O.  Fisk.  1960.  Keys  to  the  freshwater  and  anadromous  fishes  of  Cali- 
fornia. California  Fish  Game  46:453-479. 

Miller,  R.  R.  1960.  The  type  locality  of  Gasterosteus  aculeatus  williamsoni  and  its  significance 
in  the  taxonomy  of  California  sticklebacks.  Copeia  1960:348-350. 

. 1961.  Man  and  the  changing  fish  fauna  of  the  American  southwest.  Pap.  Michigan 

Acad.  Sci.,  Arts,  Lett.  46:365-404. 

. 1968.  Records  of  some  native  freshwater  fishes  transplanted  into  various  waters  of 

California,  Baja  California  and  Nevada.  California  Fish  Game  54:170-179. 

. 1972.  Threatened  freshwater  fishes  of  the  United  States.  Trans.  Amer.  Fish.  Soc. 

101:239-252. 

. 1973.  Two  new  fishes,  Gila  hicolor  snyderi  and  Catostomus  fumeiventris,  from  the 

Owens  River  basin,  California.  Occ.  Pap.  Mus.  Zool.  Univ.  Michigan  667:1-19. 

Miller,  R.  R.  and  C.  L.  Hubbs.  1969.  Systematics  of  Gasterosteus  aculeatus,  with  particular 
reference  to  intergradation  and  introgression  along  the  Pacific  Coast  of  North  America:  a 
commentary  on  a recent  contribution.  Copeia  1969:52-69. 

Robins,  C.  R.  and  R.  R.  Miller.  1957.  Classification,  variation,  and  distribution  of  the  scul- 
pins,  genus  Cottus,  inhabiting  Pacific  slope  waters  in  California  and  southern  Oregon,  with 
a key  to  the  species.  California  Fish  Game  43:213-233. 

Ross,  S.  T.  1973.  The  systematics  of  Gasterosteus  aculeatus  (Pisces:  Gasterosteidae)  in  central 
and  southern  California.  Contrib.  Sci.  Nat.  Hist.  Mus.  Los  Angeles  Co.  243:1-20. 

Shapovalov,  L. , W.  A.  Dill  and  A.  J.  Cordone.  1959.  A revised  checklist  of  the  freshwater 
and  anadromous  fishes  of  California.  California  Fish  Game  45:159-180. 

Smith,  G.  R.  1966.  Distribution  and  evolution  of  the  North  American  catostomid  fishes  of  the 


20 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  295 


subgenus  Pantosteus,  genus  Catostomus.  Misc.  Publ.  Mus.  Zool.  Univ.  Michigan  129:1- 
132. 

Snyder,  J.  O.  1908.  Description  of  Pantosteus  santa-anae,  a new  species  of  fish  from  the  Santa 
Ana  River,  California.  Proc.  U.S.  Nat.  Mus.  34:33-34. 

St.  Amant,  J.  A.,  F.  G.  Hoover  and  G.  R.  Stewart.  1973.  African  clawed  frog,  Xenopus 
laevis  (Daudin),  established  in  California.  California  Fish  Game  59:151-153. 

Accepted  for  publication  November  5,  1976. 


507-  73 


NUMBER  296 
MAY  15,  1978 


A NEW  DEEP-SEA  FISH  FROM  THE  EASTERN  NORTH  PACIFIC 
PSYCHROLUTES  PHRICTUS  (PISCES:  COTTIDAE  [PSYCHROLUTINAE] ) 


By  David  L.  Stein  and  Carl  E.  Bond 


Published  by  the  NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM 
OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007 


SERIAL  PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE 
NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 


Prior  to  November  30,  1973,  publications  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  have  appeared 
under  various  formats — Leaflet  Series,  Museum  Graphic,  Science  Series,  Study  Guides,  Con- 
tributions in  Science,  Contributions  in  History,  Science  Bulletins,  unnumbered  catalogs  of 
exhibitions,  and  other  miscellaneous  publications.  The  Museum  now  publishes  the  following 
serials  at  irregular  intervals  as  CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE,  HISTORY  BULLETINS, 
SCIENCE  BULLETINS,  EDUCATION  SERIES,  HISTORY  SERIES,  and  SCIENCE  SE- 
RIES. The  Contributions  are  short  papers  of  octavo  size.  The  Bulletins  are  longer,  compre- 
hensive papers  of  quarto  size.  The  Series  are  papers  of  variable  lengths  of  quarto  or  larger 
size.  Papers  in  each  serial  are  numbered  separately  and  consecutively. 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  contain  articles  in  the  earth  and  life  sciences,  presenting 
results  of  original  research.  Emphasis  is  intended  principally  for  papers  allied  to  biosystematic 
research,  but  other  subjects  and  review-oriented  ones  will  be  considered.  Number  1 was  issued 
on  January  23,  1957.  Contributions  must  be  not  less  than  8 nor  exceed  72  printed  pages. 


INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  AUTHORS 

Acceptance  of  manuscripts  will  be  determined  by  the  significance  of  new  information.  Priority 
will  be  given  to  manuscripts  by  staff  members.  All  manuscripts  must  be  recommended  by  the 
curator  in  charge  of  each  discipline  or  by  the  Editorial  Board.  Manuscripts  must  conform  to 
the  specifications  listed  below.  They  will  be  examined  for  suitability  by  the  Editorial  Board 
and  will  include  review  by  specialists  outside  the  Museum. 

Authors  must  adhere  to  the  International  Code  of  Nomenclature  of  Bacteria  and  Viruses, 
International  Code  of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  and  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature, including  their  respective  recommendations.  Further,  authors  proposing  new  taxa  in 
a CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  must  indicate  that  all  primary  types  have  been  deposited 
in  an  appropriate  scientific  institution  of  their  choice  and  must  cite  that  institution  by  name. 

MANUSCRIPT  FORM. — (1)  In  preparation  of  copy  follow  the  1972  CBE  Style  Manual, 
third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapters  5 and  6.  (2)  Footnotes  should  be  avoided;  acknowledgments 
as  footnotes  will  not  be  accepted.  (3)  An  informative  abstract  must  be  included  for  all  papers. 
(4)  A Spanish  summary  is  required  for  all  manuscripts  dealing  with  Latin  American  subjects. 
Summaries  in  other  languages  are  not  required  but  are  strongly  recommended.  (5)  A differ- 
ential diagnosis  must  accompany  any  newly  proposed  taxon.  (6)  Submit  two  copies  of  manu- 
script. 

ILLUSTRATIONS.— All  illustrations,  including  maps  and  photographs,  will  be  referred  to 
as  figures.  All  illustrations  should  be  of  sufficient  clarity  and  in  proper  proportions  for  reduc- 
tion to  CONTRIBUTIONS  page  size.  In  preparing  illustrations  and  legends  consult  the  1972 
CBE  Style  Manual,  third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapter  5.  Submit  only  illustrations  made  with 
permanent  ink  and  glossy  photographic  prints  of  good  contrast.  Submit  duplicate  copies  of 
all  illustrations.  Original  illustrations  will  be  returned  after  the  manuscript  has  been  published. 

PROOF. — Authors  will  be  sent  galley  proofs  which  should  be  corrected  and  returned  promptly. 
No  changes  or  alterations,  other  than  typesetting  corrections,  will  be  allowed  unless  paid  by 
author.  Requests  for  reprints  may  be  placed  through  the  Editor. 

R.  Edward  Ostermeyer 
Editor 


All  communications  concerning  manuscripts  and  exchange  of  or  purchase  of  publications 
should  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Museum  Publications,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 

Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America  by  Chapman’s  Phototypesetting  on  70#  Patina  Book 


A NEW  DEEP-SEA  FISH  FROM  THE  EASTERN  NORTH  PACIFIC 
PSYCHROLUTES  PHRICTUS  (PISCES:  COTTIDAE  [PSYCHROLUTINAE])1 

By  David  L.  Stein2  and  Carl  E.  Bond3 


Abstract:  Psychrolutes  phrictus,  new  species,  is  described  and  compared  with 
its  only  congener  P.  paradoxus,  from  which  it  differs  primarily  in  greater  head  length 
(45.3  - 60.6%  SL),  larger  adult  size  (over  500  mm),  color  pattern,  and  greater  number 
of  pectoral  fin  rays  (22-26).  The  systematic  status  of  the  subfamily  Psychrolutinae 
is  discussed. 

Psychrolutes  phrictus  is  a very  large  benthic  cottid,  known  between  Monterey, 
California,  and  northern  Oregon  at  depths  between  1006  m and  2800  m.  Individuals 
between  34  and  558  mm  SL  have  been  collected,  all  in  otter  trawls,  beam  trawls,  or 
benthic  fish  traps.  We  examined  19  preserved  and  three  skeletonized  specimens. 

We  concluded  from  analyses  of  stomach  contents  that  P.  phrictus  is  probably 
an  opportunistic  feeder.  Stomach  contents  included  24  different  items;  the  most  com- 
mon of  these  were  sea  pens  (three  species),  snails  (two  species),  and  crabs  ( Chion - 
oecetes  sp.).  Among  other  items  found  were  ophiuroids,  fishes,  hermit  crabs,  octopod 
beaks,  and  rocks.  One  specimen  (309  mm  SL)  captured  at  1097  m contained  otoliths 
of  a large  number  of  pelagic  fishes.  Capture  of  individuals  of  pelagic  species  by  P. 
phrictus  probably  depends  upon  those  individuals  swimming  near  the  bottom;  P. 
phrictus  does  not  appear  to  be  capable  of  pelagic  predation. 


Since  1960,  specimens  of  an  undescribed,  very  large  Psychrolutes  have  been 
collected  off  the  Pacific  coast  between  Monterey,  California,  and  northern  Oregon. 
The  School  of  Oceanography  of  Oregon  State  University  has  collected  individuals 
between  34  and  469  mm  SL  on  the  continental  slope  off  Oregon,  at  depths  between 
1026  and  2800  m.  Acquisition  of  small  and  intermediate- sized  specimens  has  made 
a complete  description  of  the  species  possible. 

The  family  Psychrolutidae  originally  was  characterized  by  lack  of  a spinous  dor- 
sal fin,  presence  of  a suborbital  stay,  pseudobranchiae,  thoracic  ventrals,  three  and 
a half  gill  arches,  and  naked  skin  (Gunther  1861:516).  Jordan  and  Gilbert  (1882:686) 
indicated  that  P.  paradoxus,  the  type  species  by  monotypy,  has  a spinous  dorsal  fin 
although  it  is  buried  in  loose  skin  and  flesh.  Those  authors  and  Gill  (1889)  believed 
that  differences  between  Psychrolutidae  and  Cottidae  did  not  warrant  a separate  fam- 
ily, and,  therefore,  included  Psychrolutes  in  the  latter  family.  Since  then,  some  au- 
thors (Jordan  and  Starks  1896;  McCulloch  1926;  Taranets  1941)  maintained  a separate 
family  designation  for  Psychrolutes;  and  others  (Jordan  and  Evermann  1896;  Jordan 


Review  Committee  for  this  Contribution 
J.  D.  McPhail 
Joseph  S.  Nelson 
Camm  C.  Swift 

2School  of  Oceanography,  Oregon  State  University,  Corvallis,  Oregon  97331. 
department  of  Fisheries  and  Wildlife,  Oregon  State  University,  Corvallis,  Oregon  97331. 


1 


2 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  296 


and  Starks  1904;  Hart  1973)  included  the  genus  in  the  Cottidae.  We  follow  Gill 
(1889),  and  consider  the  Psychrolutinae  as  a subfamily  of  the  Cottidae. 

METHODS 

Counts  and  measurements  follow  Hubbs  and  Lagler  (1964)  except  for  counts 
requiring  dissection  (pectoral  fin,  pelvic  fin,  gill  rakers).  These  were  made  on  the 
right  sides  of  the  specimens.  Pectoral  and  pelvic  fin  lengths  are  total  (with  dissection) 
to  base.  Vertebral  numbers  were  obtained  from  radiographs.  Counts  as  given  are  the 
mode,  and  in  parentheses,  the  range.  Morphometric  ratios  are  given  as  the  means, 
with  the  range  in  parentheses;  counts  and  ratios  of  the  holotype  are  in  brackets.  Not 
all  measurements  were  made  on  all  specimens  because  some  individuals  were  badly 
deformed  during  or  subsequent  to  capture.  The  number  of  individuals  examined  (n) 
follows  each  range.  One  specimen  (OSUO  2040)  was  cleared  and  stained  for  com- 
parison with  P.  paradoxus  specimens  that  were  treated  similarly  (OS  5300,  5301). 

Stomach  contents  were  examined  without  removal  of  stomachs  from  the  speci- 
mens. Many  specimens  had  otoliths  removed  before  our  examination;  the  otoliths  are 
in  the  care  of  John  E.  Fitch,  California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game.  Fitch  also 
removed  and  examined  stomach  contents  of  16  fish.  OSUO  specimens  were  collected 
by  3 m beam  trawl  (BMT)  and  12  m otter  trawl  (OTB).  Methods  of  collection  for 
other  specimens  are  written  out  in  materials  examined. 


MATERIALS 

Specimens  examined  are  on  deposit  at  the  National  Museum  of  Natural  History 
(USNM),  Auke  Bay  Biological  Laboratory  (ABBL),  California  Academy  of  Sciences 
(CAS),  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County  (LACM),  Department  of 
Fisheries  and  Wildlife,  Oregon  State  University  (OS),  School  of  Oceanography,  Or- 
egon State  University  (OSUO),  and  University  of  British  Columbia  (BC). 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  N.  J.  Wilimovsky,  (BC)  for  very  kindly  relinquishing  his  priority  in 
working  on  these  fishes,  assisting  us  in  our  description,  and  lending  specimens  ofP. 
paradoxus. 

For  loan  of  specimens,  we  thank  T.  Iwamoto  and  W.  Eschmeyer  (CAS),  E.  Lu 
Hall  (ABBL),  and  R.  Lavenberg  (LACM)  who  also  greatly  helped  to  facilitate  this 
work.  A.  Welander,  University  of  Washington,  donated  specimens  of  P.  paradoxus 
(OS  5300,  5301).  J.  S.  Nelson,  University  of  Alberta,  freely  gave  very  useful  advice 
and  encouraged  us. 

Joanne  Laroche  (OSUO)  cleared  and  stained  specimens  for  us  and  supplied  in- 
formation on  cottid  development. 

John  Fitch,  California  Dept,  of  Fish  and  Game,  supplied  information  on  stomach 


1978 


New  Deep-Sea  Fish  from  Eastern  North  Pacific 


3 


contents.  The  manuscript  was  reviewed  by  W.  G.  Pearcy  (OSUO),  B.  J.  Verts  (OS), 
and  J.  S.  Nelson.  Bond  was  supported  by  Oregon  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 

This  work  was  supported  by  ERDA  Contract  E(45-l)  - 2227  Task  Agreement 
12  (RLO-2227-T 12-68). 


Psychrolutes  phrictus  new  species 
Figures  1 and  2. 

Holotype:  USNM  216253  (ex  OSUO  1839),  1 (383  mm  SL,  9),  OTB  92,  44°44.3'N,  125°41.3'W, 
2800  m,  24  October  1965. 

Paratypes:  CAS  32580,  1 (478  mm  SL,  9),  sablefish  trap,  36°44.5'N,  122°04.5'W,  600  fm 
(1097  m),  22  April  1975;  LACM  35230-1,  3 (495,  522,  558  mm  SL,  9 9 9),  otter  trawl, 
40°37.3'N,  124°43.0'W,  600  fm,  (1097  m),  29  November  1974;  LACM  35232-1,  1 (519 
mm  SL,  9),  otter  trawl,  40°37.3'N,  124°43.0'W,  600  fm  (1097  m),  14  November  1974; 
LACM  34338-1,  1 (380  mm  SL,  9),  otter  trawl?,  40°45.3'N,  124°47.4'W,  700  fm  (1280 
m),  13  February  1974;  LACM  35234-1,  1 (501  mm  SL,  9),  otter  trawl,  40°45.7'N, 
124°44.0'W,  600  fm  (1097  m),  3 April  1975;  LACM  34185-1,  2 (475,  522  mm  SL,  ? 9), 
otter  trawl,  40°45.8'N,  124°43.3'W,  550  fm  (1006  m),  26  August  1974;  LACM  35561-1, 

1 (298  mm  SL,  6),  otter  trawl?  approx.  40°46.0'N,  124°44.0'W,  600  fm  (1097  m),  8 
August  1972;  LACM  30807-4,  1 (508  mm  SL,  9),  otter  trawl,  41°21.6'N,  124°56.9'W, 
725  fm  (1326  m),  25  September  1969;  OSUO  2057,  1 (440  mm  SL,  9),  BMT  419, 
42°51.9'N,  124°59.5'W,  1026  m,  17  September  1974;  OSUO  2221,  1 (148  mm  SL,  9), 
OTB  500,  43°22.0'N,  125°09.9'W,  1600  m,  4 April  1973;  OSUO  2029,  1 (469  mm  SL, 
9),  OTB  634,  43°32.0'N,  125°13.0'W,  1580  m,  7 July  1974;  OSUO  1524,  1 (399  mm 
SL,  9),  OTB  64,  44°32.5'N,  125°24.0'W,  2800  m,  9 April  1965;  OSUO  2020-2021,  2 
(34,  49  mm  SL,  immatures),  OTB  208,  44°36.0'N,  125°10.8'W,  1390  m,  30  October  1967; 
OSUO  2040,  1 (37  mm  SL,  immature),  OTB  205,  45°51.4'N,  125°15.2'W,  1600  m,  25 
October  1967  (cleared  and  stained). 

Additional  non-type  material:  LACM  35771-1,  1 (555  mm  SL,  9),  otter  trawl,  40°44.3'N, 
124°42.3'W,  510-565  fm  (933-1051  m),  30  November  1972  (skeleton);  LACM  35770-1, 

2 (538,  468  mm  SL,  9 9),  otter  trawl,  40°40.5'N,  124°44.8'W,  580-600  fm  (1061-1097 
m),  27  February  1973  (skeletons). 

Other  Collections. — Four  specimens  held  at  the  University  of  British  Columbia 
were  not  examined  by  us.  These  were  collected  off  Oregon  in  1963. 

Comparative  Material. — Psychrolutes  paradoxus  Gunther  1861:  OS  5301,  1 (35 
mm  SL,  ?)  Lopez  Is.,  San  Juan  Islands,  Washington,  10  July  1963  (cleared  and 
stained);  BC  53-260,  6 (27-29  mm  SL,  ?),  Friday  Harbor,  San  Juan  Islands,  Wash- 
ington, July  1950;  ABBL  72-74,  1 (42  mm  SL,  9),  5 (about  25  mm  SL,  ?),  southeast 
shore  of  Favorite  Channel,  vicinity  of  beach  between  Pt.  Louisa  and  Pt.  Lena,  near 
Juneau,  Alaska,  10  November  1972;  ABBL  64-755,  7 (45-48  mm  SL,  ?),  Sta.  755, 
northeast  of  Afognak  Is.,  Gulf  of  Alaska,  58°26'N,  151°5UW,  13  August  1963;  OS 
5300,  1 (37  mm  SL,  ?),  Kodiak  Is.,  Gulf  of  Alaska,  15  June  1970  (cleared  and 
stained). 

Psychrolutes  zebra  Bean  1891:  Holotype,  USNM  45364,  sex  undetermined, 
“Albatross”  sta.  2848,  55°10'N,  160°18'W,  110  fm  (201  m),  31  July  1888. 

Diagnosis. — A Psychrolutes  differing  from  its  only  congener  in  the  following: 
Head  large,  its  length  45.3-60.6%  SL;  gill  rakers  on  first  arch  9-13;  pectoral  fin  rays 
22-26.  Head  with  small  cirri,  especially  above  eyes  and  on  snout  and  lower  jaw; 


4 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  296 


'i 


Figure  1.  Psychrolutes  phrictus.  Holotype;  383  mm  SL;  USNM  216253. 


1978 


New  Deep-Sea  Fish  from  Eastern  North  Pacific 


5 


Figure  2.  Photograph  of  Psychrolutes  phrictus.  Holotype;  383  mm  SL;  USNM  216253. 


6 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  296 


scattered  cirri  on  body.  Prickles  as  well  as  cirri  present  on  heads  and  bodies  of  in- 
dividuals less  than  50  mm  SL.  Color  grayish  or  blackish,  sometimes  mottled  with 
white,  ventral  surface  often  white,  but  no  distinct  banding  or  sharply  defined  pattern. 

Description. — Dorsal  fin  rays  VIII,  20  [VIII,  20]  (VII-IX,  19-20)  (n=19),  anal 
fin  rays  13  [13]  (12-14)  (n=19),  pectoral  fin  rays  24  [23]  (22-26)  (n=19),  pelvic  fin 
rays  I,  3 (n=19),  principal  caudal  rays  about  13  [type  not  dissected].  Gill  rakers  on 
first  arch  11  [12]  (9-13)  (n=19).  Lateral  line  pores  12  [12]  (12-14)  (n=16).  Vertebrae 
[33]  (33-35)  (n=4). 

Head  length  48.9  [50.7]  (43.5-60.6%  SL)  (n=14);eye  1.  12.8  [9.1]  (8.6-24.3% 
head  1.)  (n=14),  fleshy  interorbital  width  35.6  [33.2]  (24.4-46.4%  head  1.)  (n=9), 
pectoral  1.  55.3  [55.4]  (44.9-62.3%  head  1.)  (n=14),  pelvic  1.  26.8  [24.1]  (23.3- 
34.7%  head  1.)  (n=14),  snout-anus  109.8  [105.7]  (93.8-132.2%  head  1.)  (n=15). 

Allometry  is  evident  over  the  size  range  of  individuals  examined.  Small  speci- 
mens have  longer  heads,  larger  exposed  portions  of  the  eye,  and  an  apparently  nar- 
rower interorbital  space  than  large  specimens. 

Head  unusually  large,  broad,  and  flattened.  In  smaller  individuals  (less  than  50 
mm  SL),  depth  at  occiput  about  equal  to  head  width;  in  larger  specimens,  depth  at 
occiput  about  66%  of  head  width.  Nostrils  two,  the  anterior  with  a very  distinct  tube, 
about  on  a horizontal  plane  with  suborbital  stay;  the  posterior  on  a horizontal  line 
through  pupil  of  eye,  distance  anterior  to  eye  about  equal  to  eye  diameter.  Interorbital 
space  broad,  slightly  convex.  Orbits  large,  orbital  rims  very  poorly  ossified,  especially 
in  large  individuals,  dissection  required  for  their  accurate  measurement.  Eyes  rela- 
tively large,  but  exposed  portion  reduced  in  specimens  greater  than  150  mm  SL. 
Mouth  broadly  curved,  slightly  oblique,  lips  fleshy;  in  individuals  greater  than  150 
mm  SL,  lower  jaw  distinctly  included.  Premaxillaries  not  reaching  fleshy  rictus;  a 
wide,  distinct  gap  at  medial  juncture,  a narrower  gap  present  at  mandibular  symphysis. 
Premaxillary  teeth  sharp,  stout,  small  and  recurved,  posteriorly  arranged  in  irregular 
oblique  rows,  especially  in  small  specimens,  forming  band  about  four  teeth  wide  in 
individuals  less  than  50  mm  SL,  up  to  eight  teeth  wide  in  large  (400  mm  SL)  spec- 
imens. Tooth  band  becoming  uniserial  posteriorly  in  small  individuals,  in  larger  ones 
not  narrowing  much,  not  uniserial  posteriorly. 

Cephalic  sensory  canals  well  developed,  anterior  sensory  pores  large,  distinct, 
posteriormost  pores  smaller,  difficult  to  distinguish.  Five  pores  in  a series  above  max- 
illary, eight  in  the  preoperculomandibular  series,  one  nasal  pore  close  and  lateral  to 
anterior  nostril.  Anterior  mandibular  pores  well  separated. 

Small  cirri  present  on  head  as  slender,  short,  sharply  pointed  filaments,  usually 
single,  although  some  on  mandible  are  paired.  Mandibular  cirri  form  a line  behind 
lips  although  no  distinct  pattern  present;  other  cirri  scattered  over  ventral  surface  of 
mandible.  Cirri  on  upper  part  of  head  located  between  maxillary  pores,  on  snout, 
interorbital  region,  and  posterior  to  upper  orbits.  A line  of  widely  separated  cirri  pres- 
ent along  upper  orbital  margin.  Other  cirri  scattered  widely  over  entire  head  and  body. 

Opercular  ossification  poor,  musculature  weak,  covered  with  gelatinous  layer. 
Opercular  opening  long,  extending  from  far  above  pectoral  fin  base  to  just  below  it. 

Body  behind  opercular  flaps  tapering  rapidly  to  caudal  fin.  Pectoral  fins  broad, 
well  developed,  their  bases  oblique,  rays  (except  uppermost)  evenly  graduated  in 


1978 


New  Deep-Sea  Fish  from  Eastern  North  Pacific 


7 


length  to  shortest  ray  at  anterior  (ventral)  point  of  pectoral  base.  In  specimens  above 
150  mm  SL,  approximately  the  10  lowest  rays  with  distinct  fleshy  pads  on  outer  tips; 
in  largest  specimens,  pads  very  thick,  tough,  pale  colored. 

Pelvic  fins  with  one  spine  and  three  soft  rays.  Length  of  pelvic  fin  spine  about 
50%  of  total  fin  length,  the  first  (outer)  ray  almost  equal  to  inner  two  rays  which  are 
about  equal  in  length.  Basal  half  of  fin  hidden  beneath  body  skin,  apparently  not  very 
erectile.  Distal  half  of  fin  free,  covered  with  thick  skin,  only  tips  of  rays  distinguish- 
able without  dissection.  Pelvic  bases  narrowly  separated.  Pelvic  fins  relatively  longer 
in  small  specimens. 

Dorsal  fin  with  spinous  and  soft-rayed  portions.  Anterior  spinous  portion  deeply 
buried  in  loose  skin  and  gelatinous  tissue,  its  origin  anterior  to  upper  end  of  opercular 
opening,  spines  well  developed,  stout,  although  flexible.  Spinous  portion  externally 
marked  by  short  free  filaments  above  most  spines.  A shallow  notch  present  between 
spinous  and  soft-rayed  fin  sections.  Soft  dorsal  fin  rays  becoming  gradually  longer 
posteriorly,  fin  becoming  high  and  distinctly  lobate  at  its  end.  Anal  fin  well  developed, 
of  soft  rays  only,  its  origin  below  anterior  dorsal  fin  rays. 

Anus  distant  from  origin  of  anal  fin,  anterior  to  a vertical  through  pectoral  tips. 
Body  covered  with  thick,  tough  skin,  naked,  except  in  specimens  less  than  50  mm 
SL,  which  have  simple,  sharp,  slender  prickles  distributed  over  body  except  head  and 
parts  of  fins,  especially  dense  around  anus.  Larger  individuals  with  a thick  gelatinous 
layer  between  skin  and  musculature,  often  with  distinct,  yellowish  fat  deposits  in 
concavities  of  muscles  and  bones.  In  specimens  greater  than  300  mm  SL,  skin  ex- 
tensively marked  with  pale  lines,  circles,  and  other  evidences  of  injury.  Largest  spec- 
imens (above  400  mm  SL)  with  very  distinct  areas  irregularly  covered  with  pale  rings, 
often  overlapping  in  great  numbers.  We  believe  the  rings  are  sucker  marks  of  cephalo- 
pods,  a known  food  item.  Patterns  of  rings  fit  the  disposition  of  suckers  on  octopod 
arms. 

Lateral  line  consisting  of  12-14  open  pores,  usually  well  spaced,  but  occasionally 
with  two  pores  close  together.  Posteriormost  two  pores  located  on  caudal  base  or  on 
caudal  fin  itself.  Anteriormost  lateral  line  pore  reduced,  above  gill  opening. 

Color  of  skin  grayish  or  blackish  dorsally,  often  pale  ventrally,  with  indistinct 
mottling  especially  on  head.  Mouth  pale,  opercular  cavity  pale,  peritoneum  pale, 
stomach  pale. 

Food  Habits.  — Although  the  data  obtained  through  examination  of  stomach  con- 
tents do  not  warrant  statistical  analysis,  some  speculations  are  possible  about  the  feed- 
ing habits  of  P.  phrictus.  This  species  apparently  has  a varied  diet;  a total  of  24 
different  food  items  was  found  in  the  25  stomachs  examined.  The  most  frequent  food 
items  were  sea  pens  ( Stylatula  sp.,  Balticina  ? sp.,  Funiculina  sp.)  in  12  fish;  crabs 
( Chionoecetes  sp.)  in  15  fish;  and  snails  ( Buccinium  sp.,  unidentified  sp.)  in  13  spec- 
imens. Other  food  items  were  Sebastolobus  alascanus,  Sebastes  sp.,  octopod  beaks 
(in  4 individuals),  ophiuroids,  a plastic  bag,  rocks,  hermit  crabs  {Pagurus  sp.,  Par- 
apagurus  sp.),  and  possible  anemone,  sea  cucumber,  and  crinoid  remains.  One  fish, 
LACM  35561,  309  mm  SL,  contained  a large  number  of  otoliths  of  Nansenia  sp.  and 
Lestidium  sp.  in  its  stomach,  plus  otoliths  of  Sebastes  sp.  and  T etragonurus  sp.  Except 
for  Sebastes,  all  are  known  to  be  pelagic.  Although  this  individual  was  the  smallest 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  296 


with  stomach  contents,  we  have  no  other  reason  to  believe  it  was  pelagic.  Several  of 
the  OSUO  specimens  were  smaller,  and  were  captured  with  bottom  trawls.  Because 
the  anatomy  ofP.  phrictus  is  typical  of  a demersal  cottid,  we  believe  that  the  pelagic 
species  ingested  must  have  become  available  by  swimming  near  the  bottom.  The  pos- 
sibility that  individuals  of  P . phrictus  as  small  as  300  mm  are  pelagic  is  unlikely 
because  all  specimens,  including  those  smaller  than  300  mm,  were  taken  by  bottom 
trawl. 

The  presence  of  octopod  beaks  in  the  stomach  contents  is  clear  evidence  that  P. 
phrictus  sometimes  eats  octopods.  This  may  account  for  the  scars  on  the  skin  of  the 
head  in  large  specimens.  Some  of  the  beaks  are  large:  specimen  OSUO  2029,  469 
mm  SL,  contained  a beak  from  an  octopod  estimated  (by  the  method  of  Clarke  1962) 
to  weigh  about  1 kg. 

Distribution. — Psychrolutes  phrictus  occurs  along  the  middle  and  lower  conti- 
nental slope  from  Monterey  (1097  m)  to  Eureka  (1006-1326  m),  and  off  Oregon 
(1026-2800  m).  Its  meridional  distribution  may  be  wider,  especially  towards  the  north 
where  there  seems  to  be  no  hydrographic  or  geologic  features  that  might  act  as 
barriers. 

Males  and  females  may  be  distributed  differently.  Of  the  25  specimens  of  known 
sex,  two  are  males  and  only  one  of  the  19  fish  we  examined  was  a male  (LACM 
35561-1,  298  mm  SL).  The  other  male  specimen  (Calif.  Fish  and  Game,  Eureka  Lab. 
No.  68,  475  mm  SL)  was  not  seen  by  us.  Perhaps  males  are  segregated  in  rocky  areas 
where  trawling  is  difficult. 

Etymology . — From  typiKrocr  (phriktos),  Greek,  “causing  one  to  shudder,”  from 
the  grotesque  appearance  of  the  species. 

Relationships . — Psychrolutes  phrictus  is  provisionally  thought  to  be  most  closely 
related  to  P.  paradoxus  Gunther  1861.  It  is  distinctly  different  in  the  following  re- 
spects: the  head  is  relatively  longer,  especially  in  small  specimens;  those  of  37  to  58 
mm  have  head  lengths  of  49.6  to  60.6%  with  the  overall  range  45.3-60.6%  of  SL  vs. 
P.  paradoxus  40.2-44.4%;  it  has  a larger  pectoral  fin  of  25  (22-26)  rays  vs.  P.  par- 
adoxus 21  (20-22)  rays.  It  has  cirri  whereas  P.  paradoxus  has  large  numbers  of  stout, 
blunt,  papillae  over  its  entire  body,  including  outer  surfaces  of  the  fins;  small  spec- 
imens have  many  sharp  exposed  prickles  whereas  large  P.  paradoxus  have  a few  in 
two  ventrolateral  rows  beneath  the  skin.  Its  two  inner  pelvic  fin  rays  are  about  equal, 
with  the  outer  ray  slightly  shorter;  P.  paradoxus  has  pelvic  fin  rays  evenly  graduated 
in  length,  the  outer  shortest.  Body  color  is  generally  evenly  grayish,  blackish,  or 
mottled,  whereas  that  of  P.  paradoxus  is  brown  or  black,  in  sharply  defined  bars  or 
blotches  on  a light  background,  in  a consistent  pattern.  Maximum  size  is  at  least  558 
mm,  whereas  that  of  P.  paradoxus  is  58  mm  (Hart  1973:534).  Depth  distribution 
differs:  P.  phrictus  occurs  between  1006-2800  m,  but  P.  paradoxus  is  found  between 
55-220  m (Hart  1973:534). 

Discussion. — This  is  the  only  other  species  beside  P.  paradoxus  now  referred 
to  Psychrolutes;  two  other  species  were  described  but  later  removed  from  the  genus 
or  synonymized.  Psychrolutes  latus  Hutton  was  redescribed  by  Gunther  (1876)  as  the 
type  of  a new  genus,  Neophrynichthys;  Psychrolutes  zebra  Bean  (1891)  was  synon- 
ymized with  P.  paradoxus  by  Jordan  and  Evermann  (1896:2027),  with  whom  we 
agree. 


1978 


New  Deep-Sea  Fish  from  Eastern  North  Pacific 


9 


The  relationships  of  Psychrolutes  and  closely  related  genera  (e.g.  Neophrynich- 
thys  Gunther  and  Cottunculoides  Barnard)  are  not  well  known;  the  characters  sepa- 
rating them  are  unclear.  If  future  investigations  result  in  merging  of  these  genera, 
Psychrolutes  will  be  the  senior  synonym.  We  have  placed  the  new  species  into  Psy- 
chrolutes because  it  agrees  with  the  generic  description  of  the  following  characters: 
Lack  of  spines  on  the  head,  lack  of  opercular  spines,  pelvic  fins  I,  3,  lack  of  scales 
on  the  body,  seven  branchiostegal  rays,  vomerine  and  palatine  teeth  absent,  and  dorsal 
fin  spines  completely  buried  in  flesh  or  gelatinous  tissue.  Comparison  ofP.  paradoxus 
and  P.  phrictus  using  the  above  characters  leaves  little  doubt  that  they  are  closely 
related. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Bean,  T.  H.  1891.  Scientific  results  of  explorations  by  the  U.S.  Fish  Commission  Steamer 
“Albatross”.  No.  XL  New  fishes  collected  off  the  coast  of  Alaska  and  the  adjacent  region 
southward.  Proc.  U.S.  Natl.  Mus.  13:37-45. 

Clarke,  M.  R.  1962.  The  identification  of  cephalopod  “beaks”  and  the  relationship  between 
beak  size  and  total  body  weight.  Bull.  British  Mus.  (Nat.  Hist.)  Zoology.  8(10):421— 485. 
Gill,  T.  1889.  On  the  Psychrolutidae  of  Gunther.  Proc.  U.S.  Natl.  Mus.  11:321-327. 
Gunther,  A.  1861.  Catalog  of  the  Acanthopterygian  Fishes  in  the  Collection  of  the  British 
Museum.  3:1-586. 

1876.  Remarks  on  fishes,  with  descriptions  of  new  species  in  the  British  Museum, 

chiefly  from  southern  seas.  Ann.  Nat.  Hist.  ser.  4.  17:389-402. 

Hart,  J.  L.  1973.  Pacific  Fishes  of  Canada.  Fish.  Res.  Bd.  Canada  Bull.  180:1-740. 

Hubbs,  C.  L.  and  K.  F.  Lagler.  1964.  Fishes  of  the  Great  Lakes  Region.  Revised  edition. 

University  of  Michigan  Press,  Ann  Arbor.  213  pp. 

Jordan,  D.  S.  and  B.  W.  Evermann.  1896.  The  Fishes  of  North  and  Middle  America.  Bull. 
U.S.  Natl.  Mus.  47:1-3313. 

and  C.  H.  Gilbert.  1882.  Synopsis  of  the  Fishes  of  North  America.  Smithsonian 

Misc.  Coll.  24:1-1074. 

and  E.  C.  Starks.  1896.  The  fishes  of  Puget  Sound.  Proc.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci.  ser. 

2,  5:785-855. 

1904.  A review  of  the  Cottidae  or  sculpins  found  in  the  waters  of  Japan.  Proc.  U.S. 

Natl.  Mus.  27(  1 358):23 1—335. 

McCulloch,  A.  R.  1926.  Report  on  some  fishes  obtained  by  the  F.I.S.  “Endeavour”  on  the 
coasts  of  Queensland,  New  South  Wales,  Victoria,  Tasmania,  South  and  south-western 
Australia.  Biol.  Res.  F.I.S.  “Endeavour”,  5(4):  157-216. 

Tara  nets,  A.  Y.  1941.  K klassifikatsii  i proiskhozhdenif  bychkov  semeystva  Cottidae.  Izvestiya 
Akad.  Nauk  SSSR.  Otd.  Biol.,  3:427-447.  On  the  classification  and  origin  of  the  family 
Cottidae.  Transl.  N.  J.  Wilimovsky  and  E.  Lanz.  1959.  Museum  Contr.  5,  Inst.  Fish., 
Univ.  Brit.  Columbia,  Vancouver,  Canada. 

Accepted  for  publication  January  9,  1977. 


507.  73 


NUMBER  297 
MAY  22,  1978 


A NEW  GENUS  AND  SPECIES  OF  CERATIOID  ANGLERFISH  FROM  THE 
NORTH  PACIFIC  OCEAN  WITH  A REVIEW  OF  THE  ALLIED  GENERA 
CTENOCHIRICHTHYS,  CHIROPHRYNE  AND  LEPTACANTHICHTHYS 


NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCENCC 


Published  by  the  NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM 
OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007 


SERIAL  PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE 
NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 


Prior  to  November  30,  1973,  publications  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  have  appeared 
under  various  formats — Leaflet  Series,  Museum  Graphic,  Science  Series,  Study  Guides,  Con- 
tributions in  Science,  Contributions  in  History,  Science  Bulletins , unnumbered  catalogs  of 
exhibitions,  and  other  miscellaneous  publications.  The  Museum  now  publishes  the  following 
serials  at  irregular  intervals  as  CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE,  HISTORY  BULLETINS, 
SCIENCE  BULLETINS,  EDUCATION  SERIES,  HISTORY  SERIES,  and  SCIENCE  SE- 
RIES. The  Contributions  are  short  papers  of  octavo  size.  The  Bulletins  are  longer,  compre- 
hensive papers  of  quarto  size.  The  Series  are  papers  of  variable  lengths  of  quarto  or  larger 
size.  Papers  in  each  serial  are  numbered  separately  and  consecutively. 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  contain  articles  in  the  earth  and  life  sciences,  presenting 
results  of  original  research.  Emphasis  is  intended  principally  for  papers  allied  to  biosystematic 
research,  but  other  subjects  and  review-oriented  ones  will  be  considered.  Number  1 was  issued 
on  January  23,  1957.  Contributions  must  be  not  less  than  8 nor  exceed  72  printed  pages. 


INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  AUTHORS 

Acceptance  of  manuscripts  will  be  determined  by  the  significance  of  new  information.  Priority 
will  be  given  to  manuscripts  by  staff  members.  All  manuscripts  must  be  recommended  by  the 
curator  in  charge  of  each  discipline  or  by  the  Editorial  Board.  Manuscripts  must  conform  to 
the  specifications  listed  below.  They  will  be  examined  for  suitability  by  the  Editorial  Board 
and  will  include  review  by  specialists  outside  the  Museum. 

Authors  must  adhere  to  the  International  Code  of  Nomenclature  of  Bacteria  and  Viruses, 
International  Code  of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  and  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature, including  their  respective  recommendations.  Further,  authors  proposing  new  taxa  in 
a CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  must  indicate  that  all  primary  types  have  been  deposited 
in  an  appropriate  scientific  institution  of  their  choice  and  must  cite  that  institution  by  name. 

MANUSCRIPT  FORM. — (1)  In  preparation  of  copy  follow  the  1972  CBE  Style  Manual, 
third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapters  5 and  6.  (2)  Footnotes  should  be  avoided;  acknowledgments 
as  footnotes  will  not  be  accepted.  (3)  An  informative  abstract  must  be  included  for  all  papers. 
(4)  A Spanish  summary  is  required  for  all  manuscripts  dealing  with  Latin  American  subjects. 
Summaries  in  other  languages  are  not  required  but  are  strongly  recommended.  (5)  A differ- 
ential diagnosis  must  accompany  any  newly  proposed  taxon.  (6)  Submit  two  copies  of  manu- 
script. 

ILLUSTRATIONS. — All  illustrations,  including  maps  and  photographs,  will  be  referred  to 
as  figures.  All  illustrations  should  be  of  sufficient  clarity  and  in  proper  proportions  for  reduc- 
tion to  CONTRIBUTIONS  page  size.  In  preparing  illustrations  and  legends  consult  the  1972 
CBE  Style  Manual,  third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapter  5.  Submit  only  illustrations  made  with 
permanent  ink  and  glossy  photographic  prints  of  good  contrast.  Submit  duplicate  copies  of 
all  illustrations.  Original  illustrations  will  be  returned  after  the  manuscript  has  been  published. 

PROOF. — Authors  will  be  sent  galley  proofs  which  should  be  corrected  and  returned  promptly. 
No  changes  or  alterations,  other  than  typesetting  corrections,  will  be  allowed  unless  paid  by 
author.  Requests  for  reprints  may  be  placed  through  the  Editor. 

R.  Edward  Ostermeyer 
Editor 


All  communications  concerning  manuscripts  and  exchange  of  or  purchase  of  publications 
should  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Museum  Publications,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 

Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America  by  Chapman’s  Phototypesetting  on  70#  Patina  Book 


A NEW  GENUS  AND  SPECIES  OF  CERATIOID  ANGLERFISH  FROM  THE 
NORTH  PACIFIC  OCEAN  WITH  A REVIEW  OF  THE  ALLIED  GENERA 
CT ENO CH1RICHT HYS , CH1ROPHRYNE  AND  LEPTACANTHICHTHYS 1 

By  Theodore  W.  Pietsch2 


Abstract:  A new  genus  and  species  of  deep-sea  anglerfish  is  described  on  the 
basis  of  two  specimens  collected  from  the  north  Pacific  Ocean.  The  new  form  is  most 
strikingly  characterized  by  having  an  unusually  elongate  pectoral-fin  lobe  that  bears 
the  fin  rays  along  its  dorsal  margin,  a unique  and  derived  condition  shared  with  three 
other  oneirodid  genera .Ctenochirichthys,  Chirophryne,  and  Leptacanthichthys . The 
new  form  is  described  and  compared  osteologically  with  its  nearest  allies.  It  differs 
in  having  an  extremely  short  snout,  strongly  convex  frontal  bones,  and  an  oblique 
jaw  suspension,  appearing  to  be  intermediate  in  many  ways  between  more  generalized 
oneirodids  and  the  other  three  “long-pectoraled”  forms.  It  is  probably  most  closely 
related  phylogenetically  to  Ctenochirichthys.  Chirophryne  is  perhaps  intermediate 
between  the  new  genus  and  Ctenochirichthys  on  one  hand,  and  Leptacanthichthys  on 
the  other.  A key  to  the  “long-pectoraled”  genera  is  provided. 


INTRODUCTION 

Among  the  previously  described  genera  of  the  deep-sea  anglerfish  family  Onei- 
rodidae  are  three  forms  unique  among  the  Ceratioidei  in  having  an  unusually  elongate 
pectoral-fin  lobe  that  bears  the  fin  rays  along  its  dorsal  margin.  These  genera  are 
Leptacanthichthys,  Chirophryne,  and  Ctenochirichthys.  Leptacanthichthys  was  orig- 
inally described  by  Regan  and  Trewavas  (1932)  as  one  of  five  subgenera  of  the  genus 
Dolopichthys  Garman  (1899)  to  include  a single  species,  D.  gracilispinis  Regan 
(1925),  based  on  two  metamorphosed  female  specimens.  Since  that  time  the  name 
Leptacanthichthys  has  been  given  generic  status  (Bertelsen  1951:94).  Pietsch  (1974) 
described  the  osteology  of  the  genus  and  discussed  its  phylogenetic  relationships  with 
other  oneirodid  genera.  More  recently,  Pietsch  (1976)  reported  a case  of  sexual  par- 
asitism in  Leptacanthichthys,  the  first  known  occurrence  of  this  peculiar  mode  of 
reproduction  in  the  family  Oneirodidae  and  the  first  record  of  a male  for  the  genus. 

Chirophryne  and  Ctenochirichthys  were  introduced  by  Regan  and  Trewavas 
(1932)  as  monotypic  genera:  Chirophryne  xenolophus,  described  from  a single  met- 
amorphosed female,  and  Ctenochirichthys  longimanus , based  on  two  metamorphosed 


Review  Committee  for  this  Contribution 
E.  Bertelsen 
Robert  J.  Lavenberg 
Richard  H.  Rosenblatt 
Camm  C.  Swift 

2Research  Associate  in  Ichthyology,  Natural  History  Museum,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007, 
and  Department  of  Biology,  California  State  University,  Long  Beach,  California  90840 


2 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  297 


females.  Since  the  original  publication  a second  female  ofC.  xenolophus  was  reported 
by  Pietsch  (1974:31,  fig.  58).  Two  additional  larval  males  and  an  adolescent  male  of 
C.  longimanus  were  reported  by  Bertelsen  (1951:95)  and  Beebe  and  Crane  (1947:166), 
respectively. 

Recently,  a fourth  “long-pectoraled”  oneirodid,  representing  an  undescribed 
genus  and  species,  was  discovered  among  the  ceratioids  in  the  collections  of  the  In- 
stitute of  Oceanography  of  the  Academy  of  Sciences  of  the  USSR,  Moscow,  and  the 
Scripps  Institution  of  Oceanography  in  La  Jolla.  This  new  form  is  described  and  com- 
pared with  its  nearest  allies  below. 

METHODS  AND  MATERIALS 

Standard  lengths  (SL)  are  used  throughout.  Measurements  were  taken  on  the  left 
side  whenever  possible  and  rounded  to  the  nearest  0.5  mm.  To  insure  accurate  fin- 
ray  counts  skin  was  removed  from  the  pectoral  fins  and  incisions  were  made  in  the 
skin  to  reveal  the  rays  of  the  dorsal  and  anal  fins.  Sockets,  indicating  missing  teeth 
in  the  jaws  and  on  the  vomer,  were  included  in  total  tooth  counts.  Jaw  tooth  counts 
are  the  sum  of  left  and  right  sides.  Head  length  is  the  distance  from  the  tip  of  the 
upper  jaw  to  the  posteriormost  margin  of  the  preoperculum;  head  depth  is  the  distance 
from  the  tip  of  the  sphenotic  spine  to  the  base  of  the  quadrate  spine;  lower  jaw  length 
is  the  distance  from  the  symphysial  spine  to  the  posteriormost  margin  of  the  articular; 
illicium  length  is  the  distance  from  the  articulation  of  the  pterygiophore  of  the  illicium 
and  the  illicial  bone  to  the  dorsal  surface  of  the  escal  bulb,  excluding  escal  appen- 
dages. Terminology  used  in  describing  the  various  parts  of  the  angling  apparatus  fol- 
lows Bradbury  (1967).  Definitions  of  terms  used  for  the  different  stages  of  devel- 
opment follow  Bertelsen  (1951:10-11).  Study  material  is  deposited  in  the  following 
institutions:  BMNH — British  Museum  (Natural  History),  London;  IOS — Institute  of 
Oceanographic  Sciences,  Surrey,  England  (formerly  the  National  Institute  of  Ocean- 
ography); LACM — Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County;  MCZ — Mu- 
seum of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard  University;  ROM— Royal  Ontario  Museum, 
Toronto;  SIO — Scripps  Institution  of  Oceanography,  La  Jolla;  CAS-SU — Stanford 
University  (collections  now  housed  at  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  San  Fran- 
cisco [CAS]);  ZMUC — Zoological  Museum,  University  of  Copenhagen. 

OSTEOLOGY 

The  osteology  of  Leptacanthichthys  previously  has  been  described  in  detail  and 
compared  with  that  of  other  oneirodid  genera  (Pietsch  1974).  Material  sufficient  for 
a thorough  osteological  study  of  Ctenochirichthys  and  Chirophryne  is  unavailable;  a 
few  comparative  aspects  however,  are  discussed  based  on  superficial  dissection.  An 
osteological  preparation  of  one  of  the  two  known  specimens  of  Puck  (SIO  H52-363), 
made  using  the  trypsin  digestion  technique  of  Taylor  (1967),  forms  the  basis  for  the 
following  description. 


1978 


N.  Pacific  Ocean  Ceratioid  Anglerfish 


3 


Cranium. — The  T-shaped  supraethmoid  of  Puck  has  a long  ventromedial  process 
that  forms,  together  with  the  lateral  ethmoids  and  relatively  thin,  dorsally  concave 
ethmoid  cartilage,  large,  roughly  circular,  nasal  foramina  (Fig.  1).  This  is  similar  to 
the  condition  found  in  Oneirodes  and  Danaphryne  (Pietsch  1974:16,  fig.  22).  Like 
Danaphryne,  but  again  in  contrast  to  Leptacanthichthys,  the  illicial  trough  of  Puck 
is  deep  and  narrow  resulting  from  a lateral  compression  of  the  anterior  portion  of  the 
skull,  rather  than  a medial,  dorsoventral  depression  of  the  ethmoid  region.  The  width 
of  the  ethmoid  cartilage  and  underlying  vomer  of  Puck  is  greater  than  the  distance 
between  the  anterolateral  tips  of  the  lateral  ethmoids  (Fig.  1). 

The  frontal  bones  of  Puck  (Fig.  2)  are  similar  to  those  of  Oneirodes  and  Dan- 
aphryne, having  a strongly  convex  dorsal  margin  and  occupying  a relatively  posterior 
position  on  the  skull.  The  frontals  of  Leptacanthichthys  are  considerably  longer,  have 
a nearly  linear  dorsal  margin,  and  occupy  a more  anterior  position,  overhanging  and 
extending  past  the  anterior  limits  of  the  ethmoid  cartilage  and  vomer  (Pietsch  1974:18- 
19,  figs.  2,  28-31,  34).  Ctenochirichthys  and  Chirophryne  have  moderately  convex 
frontals  (Figs.  11,  14). 

The  sphenotics  of  Puck,  Chirophryne,  and  Leptacanthichthys  are  large,  forming 


Figure  1.  Anterior  view  of  anterior  half  of  cranium  of  Puck  pinnata,  SIO  H52-363,  66.0  mm. 


4 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  297 


Figure  2.  Lateral  view  of  cranium  of  Puck  pinnata,  SIO  H52-363,  66.0  mm. 


an  elongate  spine  (Figs.  2,  9,  14,  16;  Pietsch  1974:19,  fig.  34).  The  sphenotic  spines 
of  Ctenochirichthys  are  short,  in  some  specimens  not  piercing  the  skin  (Fig.  11). 

Mandibular,  palatine,  and  hyoid  arches.  - Puck  differs  from  other  “long-pector- 
aled”  oneirodids  in  the  angle  of  the  jaw  suspension.  The  suspensorium  of  Puck  is 
strongly  oblique  in  a posterior  direction,  resulting  in  a more  posterior  position  for  the 
lower  jaw.  In  contrast,  the  angle  of  the  jaw  suspension  in  Ctenochirichthys,  Chiro- 
phryne,  and  Leptacanthichthys  is  nearly  vertical;  the  lower  jaw  extends  forward 
slightly  beyond  the  premaxillaries. 

Puck  and  Ctenochirichthys  are  similar  in  that  the  distal  ends  of  the  upper  jaw 
bones  are  held  in  a forward  position  on  the  dentary  by  a relatively  short  anterior 
maxillomandibular  ligament,  resulting  in  a short  gape  that  terminates  anterior  to  the 
eye  (Fig.  3A,  B,  9,  11).  Although,  the  anterior  maxillomandibular  ligament  of  Cten- 
ochirichthys is  slightly  longer  than  that  of  Puck,  it  originates  much  further  forward 
on  the  dentary.  For  this  reason,  the  length  of  the  gape  of  Ctenochirichthys  is  slightly 
shorter  than  that  of  Puck.  The  anterior  maxillomandibular  ligament  of  Chirophryne 
and  Leptacanthichthys  is  considerably  longer  than  that  of  Puck  and  Ctenochirichthys, 
the  upper  jaw  bones  are  more  horizontal  in  position,  and  the  gape  of  the  mouth  extends 
past  the  level  of  the  eye  (Figs.  3C,  D,  14,  16). 

In  apparent  correlation  with  this  difference  in  jaw  mechanism,  the  suspensoria 
(as  well  as  the  opercular  apparatus  and  pectoral  girdles)  of  Puck  and  Ctenochirichthys 
flare  out  laterally  so  that  viewed  head-on,  the  crania  of  these  genera  are  considerably 
more  narrow  than  the  distance  between  the  posterior  ends  of  the  lower  jaw  (Fig.  13  A, 
B).  Thus,  the  mouths  of  these  two  genera  are  short,  yet  wide,  relative  to  other  onei- 


1978 


N.  Pacific  Ocean  Ceratioid  Anglerfish 


5 


C D 


Figure  3.  Lateral  views  of  jaws  with  anterior  maxillomandibular  ligaments  indicated  by  stip- 
pling: A.  Puck  pinnata,  holotype,  LACM  34276-1,  46.0  mm;  B.  Ctenochirichthys  longimanus, 
lectotype,  ZMUC  P9297,  12.5  mm;  C.  Chirophryne  xenolophus,  SIO  70-306,  22.0  mm;  D. 
Leptacanthichthys  gracilispinis,  LACM  33625-2,  56.0  mm. 

rodids.  In  contrast,  the  crania  of  Chirophryne  and  Leptacanthichthys  are  equal  in 
width,  or  slightly  wider  than  the  distance  between  the  posterior  ends  of  the  lower  jaw 
(Fig.  13C,  D);  their  mouths  are  consequently  longer,  yet  more  narrow. 

Among  oneirodids,  differences  in  the  size  and  shape  of  the  bones  of  the  lower 
jaw  are  correlated  with  differences  in  the  length  and  depth  of  the  cranium  (Pietsch 
1974:20).  Puck  has  a relatively  short,  deep  cranium,  and  consequently,  like  Oneirodes 
and  Danaphryne,  has  short,  deep  dentaries  and  articular  bones  (Fig.  4;  Pietsch  1974: 


6 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  297 


Figure  4.  Lateral  view  of  left  side  of  lower  jaw,  suspensorium  and  opercular  apparatus  of  Puck 
pinnata,  SIO  H52-363,  66.0  mm. 


9,  20-21,  figs.  8,  40).  Leptacanthichthys,  on  the  other  hand,  is  a long-jawed  genus 
with  a more  elongate,  narrow  cranium  (Pietsch  1974:  20-21,  fig.  42). 

Variation  in  the  length  and  width  of  the  palatine  arch  is  also  associated  with  the 
length  and  depth  of  the  cranium.  Puck,  Oneirodes,  and  Danaphryne  have  short,  broad 
mesopterygoid,  ectopterygoid  and  palatine  bones  as  compared  to  Leptacanthichthys 
in  which  these  bones  are  considerably  more  elongate  and  narrow  (Fig.  4;  Pietsch  1974: 
9-10,  21,  figs.  8,  40,  42). 

At  the  articulation  of  the  lower  jaw  and  suspensorium,  the  articular  and  quadrate 
bones  form  spines  (the  mandibular  and  quadrate  spines,  respectively),  which  vary  in 
relative  length  among  oneirodids.  The  mandibular  spine  is  considerably  shorter  than 
the  quadrate  spine  in  Puck  and  Chirophryne  (Figs.  5A,  14),  but,  in  contrast  to  all 
other  oneirodids,  the  mandibular  spine  is  considerably  longer  than  the  quadrate  spine 
in  Leptacanthichthys  (Fig.  5B).  Both  spines  are  rudimentary  in  Ctenochirichthys  (Fig. 
11,  Table  2). 

In  all  oneirodids  the  jaw  teeth  are  slender,  recurved  and  depressible,  large  and 
small  ones  intermixed  in  both  jaws.  The  considerably  longer  gape  of  Leptacanthich- 
thys provides  space  for  a greater  number  of  upper  and  lower  jaw  teeth  than  are  found 
in  Puck  and  Ctenochirichthys.  Chirophryne,  known  from  only  two  small,  adolescent 
females  (11.0  and  22.0  mm),  doubtless  has  a greater  number  of  jaw  teeth  in  larger 
specimens  (Table  2). 

Opercular  apparatus. — The  shape  of  the  subopercular  bone  varies  considerably 


1978 


N.  Pacific  Ocean  Ceratioid  Anglerfish 


7 


Figure  5.  Ventrolateral  views  of  posterior  part  of  lower  jaw,  left  side,  showing  arrangement 
of  quadrate  and  mandibular  spines:  A.  Puck  pinnata,  holotype,  LACM  34276-1,  46.0  mm;  B. 
Leptacanthichthys  gracilispinis,  LACM  33625-2,  56.0  mm. 


between  genera  and  is  a diagnostic  feature  of  many  oneirodids.  The  subopercula  of 
Puck  and  Ctenochirichthys  are  elongate  and  slender  throughout  their  length,  the  upper 
end  tapering  to  a point  (Fig.  6A-C;  Bertelsen  1951:94,  fig.  51).  Those  of  Leptacan- 
thichthys and  the  two  known  specimens  of  Chirophryne  (11.0  and  22.0  mm)  are  short 
and  broad,  the  upper  end  rounded  to  bluntly  pointed  (Fig.  6D-G;  Bertelsen  1951:94, 
figs.  49,  50;  subopercula  of  other  oneirodids  are  figured  by  Pietsch  1974). 

Branchial  arches. — The  branchial  arches  of  Puck  are  similar  to  those  of  Dana- 
phryne  and  Leptacanthichthys  (Pietsch  1974:25).  Pharyngobranchials  II  and  III  are 
well  developed  and  bear  eight  and  ten  long,  slender  teeth,  respectively  (Fig.  7;  Pietsch 
1974:25,  fig.  51A,  C). 

Dorsal  and  anal  fins. — Puck,  Chirophryne  and  most  specimens  of  Leptacanthich- 
thys have  five  dorsal  rays;  Ctenochirichthys  has  six  or  seven.  Puck,  Chirophryne  and 
most  individuals  of  Ctenochirichthys  have  four  anal  rays;  Leptacanthichthys  has  five 
or  six  (Table  1;  fin-ray  counts  for  other  oneirodids  are  given  by  Pietsch  1974:27-28, 
table  23). 

Pectoral  lobe. — The  pectoral  lobe  (pectoral  fin,  excluding  fin  rays)  of  Puck, 
Ctenochirichthys,  Leptacanthichthys  and,  to  a lesser  degree,  Chirophryne  (but  known 
only  from  small  specimens),  is  unusually  long  and  narrow  (Fig.  8;  Regan  and  Tre- 
wavas  1932:35-36,  fig.  42C,  D;  Pietsch  1974:29,  fig.  55).  Unlike  that  of  other  onei- 
rodids, the  first  radial  (uppermost)  is  considerably  shorter  than  the  second;  the  car- 
tilaginous distal  end  of  the  third  radial  is  expanded  in  an  antero-posterior  direction  to 
meet  the  distal  end  of  the  considerably  shorter  second  radial.  The  fin  rays,  thus  ar- 
ticulate along  the  upper  margin  of  the  pectoral  lobe  (Figs.  9,  11,  14,  16). 

A curious  division  of  the  distal  end  of  the  lowermost  radial  and  its  cartilage  is 
present  in  the  pectoral  lobe  of  both  known  specimens  of  Puck  (Fig.  8 A),  possibly 


8 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  297 


Figure  6.  Lateral  view  of  opercular  bones,  right  side:  A.  Puck  pinnata,  SIO  H52-363,  66.0 
mm;  B.  Puck  pinnata,  holotype  LACM  34276-1,  46.0  mm;  C.  Ctenochirichthys  longimanus, 
paralectotype,  BMNH  1932.5.3.20,  36.5  mm;  D . Leptacanthichthys  gracilispinis,  ROM  27284, 
54.0  mm;  E.  Leptacanthichthys  gracilispinis,  ROM  27293,  43.0  mm;  F.  Leptacanthichthys  gra- 
cilispinis, ROM  27274,  41.0  mm;  G.  Chirophryne  xenolophus,  SIO  70-306,  22.0  mm. 


Figure  7.  Pharyngobranchials  of  Puck  pinnata,  SIO  H52-363,  66.0  mm. 


1978 


N.  Pacific  Ocean  Ceratioid  Anglerfish 


9 


Figure  8.  Lateral  view  of  pectoral  radials,  left  side:  A.  Puck  pinnata,  SIO  H52-363,  66.0  mm; 
B.  Ctenochirichthys  longimanus,  paralectotype,  BMNH  1932.5.3.20,  36.5  mm. 


indicating  a fusion  of  two  radials  (see  Pietsch  1972:41-42,  fig.  23).  All  oneirodids 
are  thought  to  have  three  pectoral  radials,  the  possible  presence  of  four  radials  in  Puck 
further  complicates  the  already  cumbersome  diagnosis  of  the  family  (Pietsch  1974:30). 

Puck,  Chirophryne,  and  Leptacanthichthys  have  pectoral-fin  ray  counts  ranging 
from  18  to  21;  Ctenochirichthys  has  considerably  more  pectoral- fin  rays  ranging  from 
28-30  (Table  1). 

Skin  Spines. — Skin  spines  could  not  be  detected  microscopically  in  the  single 
osteo logical  preparation  of  Puck. 


SYSTEMATICS 

Key  to  the  “long-pectoraled”  genera  of  the  Oneirodidae 

IA.  Sphenotic  and  articular  spines  short,  in  some  cases  not  piercing  skin  (Fig.  11); 
length  of  pectoral  lobe  greater  than  15  per  cent  of  SL;  pectoral  fin  rays  27-30  . 
Ctenochirichthys  Regan  and  Trewavas  1932. 

IB.  Sphenotic  and  articular  spines  long,  piercing  skin  (Figs.  9,  14,  16);  length  of 

pectoral  fin  lobe  less  than  15  per  cent  of  SL;  pectoral  fin  rays  17-21 2. 


Table  1 

Fin-ray  frequencies  for  “long-pectoraled”  genera  of  Oneirodidae 


Dorsal 
A 5 61 

Anal 
4 5 6 

Pectoral  (both  sides ) 

18  19  20  21  — 28  29  30 

Puck  pinnatus 

2 

2 

4 

Ctenochirichthys  longimanus 

1 3 

3 1 

1 2 5 

Chirophryne  xenolophus 

2 

2 

2 2 

Leptacanthichthys  gracilispinis 

1 7 2 

9 1 

12  4 7 

10 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  297 


2A.  Length  of  quadrate  spine  less  than  length  of  mandibular  spine  (Fig.  5B);  dorsal 
profile  of  frontal  bones  nearly  linear  (Fig.  16);  esca  with  a single  appendage 

arising  from  dorsal  surface  (Fig.  17);  anal  fin  rays  5-6 

Leptacanthichthys  Regan  and  Trewavas  1932. 

2B.  Length  of  quadrate  spine  greater  than  length  of  mandibular  spine  (Fig.  5A); 
dorsal  profile  of  frontal  bones  convex  (Figs.  9,  14);  esca  with  more  than  a 
single  appendage,  either  five  separate  appendages  arising  from  dorsal  surface 
or  three  dorsal  appendages  and  a lateral  filament  (Figs.  10,  15);  anal  fin  rays 
4 3. 

3A.  Length  of  anterior  maxillo  mandibular  ligament  greater  than  one-half  length  of 
premaxillary,  gape  of  mouth  extending  beyond  eye  (Fig.  3C);  suboperculum 
short  and  broad,  upper  end  rounded  (Fig.  6G);  esca  without  a lateral  filament 
(Fig.  15)  Chirophryne  Regan  and  Trewavas  1932. 

3B.  Length  of  anterior  maxillo  mandibular  ligament  less  than  one-half  length  of 
premaxillary,  gape  of  mouth  terminating  before  eye  (Fig.  3A);  suboperculum 
long  and  narrow,  upper  end  tapering  to  a point  (Fig.  6A,  B);  esca  with  a lateral 
filament  (Fig.  10) Puck  new  genus. 


Puck  NEW  GENUS 

Type  species.  - Puck  pinnata  new  species 

Diagnosis  for  females. — A member  of  the  Oneirodidae  as  diagnosed  by  Pietsch 
(1974:30)  distinguished  by  the  following  combination  of  characters:  snout  extremely 
short,  dorsal  profile  of  frontal  bones  strongly  convex,  gape  of  mouth  terminating  an- 
terior to  eye;  length  of  anterior  maxillomandibular  ligament  less  than  one-half  length 
of  premaxillary  (Fig.  3 A);  hyomandibular  with  a double  head;  anterior  end  of  pter- 
ygiophore  of  illicium  exposed,  its  posterior  end  concealed  under  skin;  illicium  length 
10.7  - 18.5  per  cent  of  SL;  lower  jaw  with  a small  symphysial  spine;  sphenotic  spines 
well  developed;  articular  spines  present,  quadrate  spine  nearly  six  times  length  of 
mandibular  spine  (Fig.  5 A);  angular  spine  absent;  vomerine  teeth  present;  pharyn- 
gobranchial  I absent;  pharyngobranchials  II  and  HI  present  and  toothed  (Fig.  7);  epi- 
branchial  teeth  absent;  hypobranchial  II  present;  pectoral-fin  lobe  long  and  narrow, 
longer  than  the  longest  rays  of  pectoral  fin  (Figs.  8 A,  9);  suboperculum  elongate, 
slender  throughout  length,  upper  end  tapering  to  a point,  lower  end  without  anterior 
spine  or  projection  (Fig.  6A,  B);  anal  fin  with  4 rays;  skin  naked  (embedded  dermal 
spines  cannot  be  detected  microscopically  in  bleached  and  stained  skin),  covering 
caudal  fin  to  some  distance  from  fin  base. 

Puck  resembles  the  oneirodid  genera  Ctenochirichthys,  Chirophryne,  and  Lep- 
tacanthichthys in  having  an  unusually  long  and  narrow  pectoral-fin  lobe  in  which  the 
first  radial  is  considerably  shorter  than  the  second,  and  the  second  ankylosed  to  the 
distal  expansion  of  the  third  (Fig.  8 A,  B).  Puck  is  clearly  distinguished  from  these 
forms,  however,  by  its  extremely  short  snout,  strongly  convex  frontal  bones,  and 
oblique  jaw  suspension.  It  is  further  distinguished  from  Chirophryne  and  Leptacan- 


1978 


N.  Pacific  Ocean  Ceratioid  Anglerfish 


11 


thichthys  by  having  a short  anterior  maxillomandibular  ligament,  a short,  yet  wide 
mouth  (Figs.  3,  13),  and  an  elongate  subopercular  bone  (Fig.  6);  and  from  Cteno- 
chirichthys  by  its  well-developed  sphenotic  and  articular  spines  (Figs.  9,  1 1,  13). 

Males  and  larvae. — Unknown. 

Etymology.  — The  name  Puck,  to  be  treated  as  a noun  of  feminine  gender,  is 
taken  from  Germanic  folklore,  a minor  order  of  mischievous  devils,  sprites,  goblins 
or  demons;  a devilish  trickster. 

Puck  pinnata  new  species 
Figures  1-3A,  4,  5A,  6A,B,  7,  8A,  9,  10,  13A,  18 
Tables  1,  2 

Holotype. — LACM  34276-1,  46.0  mm,  female;  VITYAZ  Cruise  19,  Station 
3199,  Sample  123b,  western  north  Pacific,  38°  16'  N,  152°  34'  E;  6 m diameter 
conical  ring  net  fished  open  with  5350  m of  wire  out;  bottom  depth  5420-5350  m; 
0230-0545  hr;  16  October  1954. 

Paratype. — SIO  H52-363,  66.0  mm,  female;  HORIZO N,  between  Stations  SB 
101  and  102;  Berner,  Juhl  and  Schaefer,  collectors;  eastern  tropical  Pacific,  6°  58' 
N,  88°  35'  W;  3 m IKMT,  fished  open  between  surface  and  1464  m;  1 July  1952. 

Description  of  the  holotype. — Escal  bulb  with  a stout,  rounded,  anterodorsally 
directed  and  internally  pigmented  anterior  papilla;  a similar,  posterodorsally  directed 
medial  papilla  without  internal  pigment;  distal  ends  of  anterior  and  medial  papillae 
darkly  pigmented;  an  unpigmented,  compressed  posterior  appendage  bearing  antero- 
dorsally a lump  of  tissue  of  uncertain  morphology;  and  a tapering,  unpigmented  lateral 
filament  on  each  side,  slightly  less  than  length  of  escal  bulb  (Fig.  10). 

Operculum  bifurcate,  the  two  forks  forming  an  acute  angle  of  25°;  length  of  lower 
fork  23.9  per  cent  of  SL,  upper  fork  72.7  per  cent  of  length  of  lower  fork;  length  of 
suboperculum  40.9  per  cent  of  length  of  lower  fork  (Fig.  6A,  B). 

Teeth  as  described  for  family;  longest  tooth  in  upper  jaw  2.0  mm,  in  lower  jaw 
3.0  mm;  pelvics  absent;  caudal  fin  9 (2  unbranched  - 4 branched  - 3 unbranched); 
branchiostegal  rays  6 (2  + 4). 


Figure  9.  Holotype  of  Puck  pinnata,  LACM  34276-1,  46.0  mm. 


12 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  297 


Figure  10.  Esca  of  Puck  pinnata,  holotype,  LACM  34276-1,  46.0  mm. 


Fin  ray  counts  are  given  in  Table  1,  tooth  counts  and  body  measurements  in 
Table  2. 

Etymology. — The  specific  name  is  derived  from  the  Latin  pinnata,  meaning 
plumed  or  winged,  in  reference  to  the  narrow,  elongate  pectoral  fins. 

Distribution. — Puck  pinnata  is  known  from  two  metamorphosed  females:  the 
holotype  collected  from  the  western  north  Pacific  at  38°  16'  N,  152°  34'  E,  and  a 
second  specimen  from  the  eastern  tropical  Pacific  at  6°  58'  N,  88°  35'  W (Fig.  18). 


Ctenochirichthys  Regan  and  Trewavas 

Ctenochirichthys  Regan  and  Trewavas  1932:82,  pi.  Ill,  fig.  3 (type  species  Ctenochirichthys 
longimanus  Regan  and  Trewavas  1932,  by  original  designation). 

Diagnosis  for  Females  (based  on  two  metamorphosed  females,  12.5  and  36.5 
mm). — The  genus  Ctenochirichthys  differs  from  all  other  oneirodid  genera  in  having 
greatly  reduced  sphenotic  and  articular  spines  that,  in  some  cases  do  not  pierce  the 
skin,  an  extremely  elongate  pectoral-fin  lobe  greater  than  15  per  cent  of  SL,  and  a 


Table  2 

Tooth  counts  and  body  measurements  in  percent  of  SL  for  “long-pectoraled”  genera  of  Oneirodidae 


1978 


N.  Pacific  Ocean  Ceratioid  Anglerfish 


13 


■g  § 

.s 


■«  g, 

a,  -S 

•§  § 


1 U r- 
' D on 


2 o' 

N ^ 


S oo 

9 PJ 

05  <N 

f § a 

8 S £ 


§ oo 

m d 

w <N 

On 


S ON 

9 p! 

05  (N) 

S ? 

g P! 

05  r j 


g 3 

< P: 

n!  rvi 


£ 


2 ° 
««  6 


NO 

o ^ 
55  K 
x 


§0 


I |— 1 


NO  'sf  00  Tj-  NO 


<n  >o  t-~  Tt  oo 


m n in  n - 


| I' 

c c 

<U  <U 

s e : 

•3  ’S 

5 2 

6 & 


.1  M 

■o  T3 

2 2 

d d 


m r~-  oo  no  «o 


oo  r~~  no  <N  O no 


r-~  no  co  no 


00  00 

^ o 


On  On 

''fr  o 


-H  no  O no  On 

W Tf 


[ ■ o CN  *0  On  (N 


<n  — — < r-  ° 

d Tt  ri  d 

m m <n  (N  — < 


On  ro  fN  NO 


r~  oo  cn  o 


m On  cn 

d d d 


w>  oo 
d no 


00  O 
d (N 


OO  Nf  |V 
NO  d d 


10  © «o  no 


«3 


3,3 


« ■g  1 1 


6 ? 
3 


•s  « 3 J3 

O 2 .-2  O. 
.2  3 § -3  •§  .g 

.y  o -C  2 § 73 

~~  <u  a,  3 d "a 

M £X  75  O'  2 « 


NO  NO 

d £ 2 


\fi  N 7) 
I O O 
NO  — l — c 


^ © "3- 
Tt  m rn 


| 

I & | 

£ £3 


K £ 


14 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  297 


high  number  of  pectoral  fin  rays,  27  to  30.  In  addition,  Ctenochirichthys  is  unique 
in  having  the  following  combination  of  characters:  snout  short,  dorsal  profile  of  frontal 
bones  convex;  gape  of  mouth  terminating  anterior  to  or  beneath  eye;  length  of  anterior 
maxillomandibular  ligament  less  than  one-half  length  of  premaxillary  (Fig.  3B);  hy- 
omandibular  with  a double  head;  anterior  end  of  pterygiophore  of  illicium  exposed, 
its  posterior  end  concealed  under  skin;  illicium  length  24.8  - 31.2  per  cent  of  SL; 
lower  jaw  with  a small  symphysial  spine;  angular  spine  absent;  vomerine  teqth  present; 
pharyngo-branchials  II  and  HI  present  and  toothed;  epibranchial  teeth  absent;  suboper- 
culum elongate,  slender  throughout  length,  upper  end  tapering  to  a point,  lower  end 
without  anterior  spine  or  projection  (Fig.  6C);  anal  fin  with  4 or  5 rays;  skin  presum- 
ably naked  (bleached  and  stained  skin  not  available  for  examination),  covering  caudal 
fin  to  some  distance  from  fin  base. 

Diagnosis  for  males  and  larvae. — See  Bertelsen  (1951:95). 


Ctenochirichthys  longimanus  Regan  and  Trewavas 
Figures  3B,  6C,  8B,  11-13B,  18 
Tables  1,  2 

Dolopichthys  heteracanthus  Regan  1926:28  (in  part). 

Ctenochirichthys  longimanus  Regan  and  Trewavas  1932:82,  pi.  Ill,  fig.  3 (original  description; 
two  specimens;  lectotype,  designated  by  Bertelsen  1951,  ZMUC  P9297).  Bertelsen  1951:75, 
94-96,  figs.  51-52,  table  16  (redescription  of  type  material;  males  and  larvae  described; 
opercular  bones,  larval  male,  adolescent  male,  and  lectotype  figured;  in  key).  Grey  1956:251 
(synonymy;  distribution).  Bussing  1965:  222  (misidentification,  specimen  here  referred  to 
Pentherichthys  atratus ).  Pietsch  1974:31,  32,  89,  table  23  (relationships;  in  key). 
Trematorhynchus  multiradiatus  Beebe  and  Crane  1947:  166,  text  fig.  11  (original  description; 
single  male  specimen;  CAS-SU  46491).  Bertelsen  1951:95,  fig.  52B  (redescription;  com- 
parison with  all  known  material;  figured). 

Material. — Two  females,  12.5  - 36.5  mm,  two  larval  males,  4.5  - 5.0  mm,  and 
a single  adolescent  male,  11.5  mm. 


Figure  11.  Paralectotype  of  Ctenochirichthys  longimanus,  BMNH  1932.5.3.20,  36.5  mm. 


1978 


N.  Pacific  Ocean  Ceratioid  Anglerfish 


15 


Lectotype  of  Ctenochirichthys  longimanus. — ZMUC  P9297,  12.5  mm;  DANA 
Station  3548  (2);  Gulf  of  Panama,  7°  06'  N,  79°  55'  W;  3000  m wire;  1030  hr;  3 
September  1928. 

Paralectotype  of  Ctenochirichthys  longimanus — BMNH  1932.5.3.20,  36.5  mm; 
DANA  Station  1206  (5);  Gulf  of  Panama,  6°  40'  N,  80°  47'  W;  2500  m wire;  1845 
hr;  14  January  1922. 

Holotype  of  Trematorhynchus  multiradiatus. — CAS-SU  46491,  11.5  mm;  East- 
ern Pacific ZACA  Expedition  Station  225,  Net  No.  T-l;  11  miles  southwest  of  Jicaron 
Island,  Panama,  7°  08'  N,  81°  57'  W;  1 m diameter  conical  ring  net,  0-910  m;  20 
March  1938. 

Non-type  material. — ZMUC  P92795,  5.0  mm;  DANA  Station  3548(7);  Gulf  of 
Panama,  7°  06'  N,  79°  55'  W;  100  m wire;  2000  hr;  3 September  1928.  ZMUC 


Figure  12.  Esca  of  Ctenochirichthys  longimanus,  lectotype,  ZMUC  P9297,  12.5  mm. 


16 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  297 


P92794,  4.5  mm,  DANA  Station  1141(14);  eastern  north  Atlantic,  34°  15'  N,  16°  53' 
W;  300  m wire;  2355  hr;  14  October  1921. 

Description  of  females. — Escal  bulb  with  a short,  rounded  anterior  appendage; 
a darkly  pigmented,  raised  band  of  tissue  extending  over  dorso-medial  surface  and 
down  onto  sides  of  bulb  with  a circular  unpigmented  area  on  each  side;  an  unpig- 
mented,  compressed,  tapering  posterior  appendage;  lateral  filaments  absent  (Fig.  12). 

Operculum  bifurcate,  the  two  forks  forming  an  acute  angle  of  38°;  length  of  lower 
fork  21.9  per  cent  of  SL,  upper  fork  52.5  per  cent  of  length  of  lower  fork;  length  of 
suboperculum  51.2  per  cent  of  length  of  lower  fork  of  operculum  (Fig.  6C). 

Teeth  as  described  for  family;  pelvics  absent;  caudal  fin  9 (2  unbranched- 
4 branched  - 3 unbranched);  branchiostegal  rays  6 (2  + 4).  Fin  ray  counts  are  given 
in  Table  1,  tooth  counts  and  body  measurement  in  Table  2. 

Distribution . — Ctenochirichthys  longimanus  is  known  from  five  specimens,  four 
of  which  were  collected  in  the  Gulf  of  Panama.  The  fifth  specimen,  a larval  male, 
was  taken  in  the  eastern  north  Atlantic  at  34°  15'  N,  16°  53'  W (Fig.  18). 


Chirophryne  Regan  and  Trewavas 

Chirophryne  Regan  and  Trewavas  1932:81-82,  figs.  131-132  (type  species  Chirophryne  xeno- 
lophus  Regan  and  Trewavas  1932,  by  original  designation). 

Diagnosis  for  females  (based  on  two  metamorphosed  specimens,  11.0  and  22.0 
mm). — Chirophryne  differs  from  other  oneirodid  genera  in  having  the  following  com- 
bination of  characters:  snout  moderate  in  length,  dorsal  profile  of  frontal  bones  con- 
vex; gape  of  mouth  extending  past  eye;  length  of  anterior  maxillomandibular  ligament 
greater  than  half  length  of  premaxillary  (Fig.  3C);  hyomandibular  with  a double  head; 
anterior  end  of  pterygiophore  of  illicium  exposed,  its  posterior  end  concealed  under 
skin;  illicium  length  18.2  - 22.7  per  cent  of  SL;  lower  jaw  with  a small  symphysial 
spine;  sphenotic  spines  well  developed;  articular  spines  present,  quadrate  spine  nearly 
six  times  length  of  mandibular  spine;  vomerine  teeth  present;  pharyngobranchials  II 
and  III  present  and  toothed;  epibranchial  teeth  present;  pectoral-fin  lobe  long  and  nar- 
row, longer  than  the  longest  rays  of  pectoral  fin;  suboperculum  short  and  broad,  upper 
end  rounded,  lower  end  without  anterior  spine  or  projection  (Fig.  6G);  anal  fin  with 
4 rays;  skin  presumably  naked  (bleached  and  stained  skin  not  available  for  exami- 
nation), covering  caudal  fin  to  some  distance  from  fin  base. 

Males  and  larvae. — Unknown. 


Chirophryne  xenolophus  Regan  and  Trewavas 
Figures  3C,  6D,  13C,  14,  15,  18 
Tables  1,  2 

Chirophryne  xenolophus  Regan  and  Trewavas  1932:81-82,  figs.  131-132  (original  description; 
single  specimen;  holotype  ZMUC  P9296).  Bertelsen  1951:75,  94,  fig.  50  (redescription  of 
holotype;  opercular  bone  figured;  in  key).  Grey  1956:250-251  (synonymy;  distribution). 
Pietsch  1974:31,  32,  89,  table  23  (relationships;  in  key). 


1978 


N.  Pacific  Ocean  Ceratioid  Anglerfish 


17 


Material. — Two  adolescent  females,  11.0  - 22.0  mm. 

Holotype. — ZMUC  P9296,  11.0  mm,  DAN  A Station  3731(12);  South  China  Sea, 
14°  37'  N,  119°  52'  E;  2500  m wire;  0200  hr;  17  June  1929. 

Non-type  material. — SIO  70-306,  22.0  mm;  ANTIPODES  Expedition  Station 
4-51A,  Trawl  1;  32°  10'  N,  136°  05'  E;  0-1400  m;  2355-0746  hr;  28-29  August  1970. 

Description  of  22.0  mm  female. — Escal  bulb  with  an  unpigmented,  tapering  an- 
terior appendage  connected  by  a thin  membrane  to  an  internally-pigmented  antero- 


C D 

Figure  13.  A.  Puck  pinnata,  holotype,  LACM  34276-1,  46.0  mm;  B.  Ctenochirichthys  lon- 
gimanus,  paralectotype,  BMNH  1932.5.3.20,  36.5  mm;  C.  Chirophryne  xenolophus,  SIO  70- 
306,  22.0  mm;  D.  Leptacanthichthys  gracilispinis,  LACM  33625-2,  56.0  mm. 


18 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  297 


Figure  14.  Chirophryne  xenolophus,  SIO  70-306,  22.0  mm. 


Figure  15.  Esca  of  Chirophryne  xenolophus,  SIO  70-306,  22.0  mm. 

dorsal  appendage  that  is  darkly  pigmented  on  distal  tip  except  for  a small,  circular, 
unpigmented  area  on  each  side;  a pair  of  bilaterally  placed,  unpigmented  medial  ap- 
pendages; an  unpigmented,  compressed,  posterior  appendage  bearing  distally  a rounded 
lump  of  tissue  that  tapers  to  a point;  lateral  filaments  absent  (Fig.  15;  Regan  and 
Trewavas  1932:82  fig.  132). 


1978 


N.  Pacific  Ocean  Ceratioid  Anglerfish 


19 


Operculum  bifurcate,  the  two  forks  forming  an  acute  angle  of  37°;  length  of  lower 
fork  25.4  per  cent  of  SL,  upper  fork  55.2  per  cent  of  length  of  lower  fork;  length  of 
suboperculum  32.5  per  cent  of  length  of  lower  fork  of  operculum  (Fig.  6G). 

Teeth  as  described  for  family;  longest  tooth  in  upper  jaw  0.5  mm;  in  lower  jaw 
1.0  mm;  pelvics  absent;  caudal  fin  9 (2  unbranched  - 4 branched  - 3 unbranched); 
branchiostegal  rays  6 (2  + 4). 

Fin  ray  counts  are  given  in  Table  1,  tooth  counts  and  body  measurements  in 
Table  2. 

Distribution. — Chirophryne  xenolophus  is  known  from  two  adolescent  females: 
the  holotype  collected  from  the  South  China  Sea  and  a second  specimen  from  off 
Japan  at  32°  10'  N,  136°  05'  E (Fig.  18). 

Leptacanthichthys  Regan  and  Trewavas 

Dolopichthys  (subgenus  Leptacanthichthys)  Regan  and  Trewavas  1932:66,  80,  fig.  128  (genus 
Dolopichthys  broadened  to  incorporate  five  subgenera,  amended  by  Bertelsen  1951;  type 
species  Dolopichthys  gracilispinis  Regan  1925,  by  monotypy). 

Leptacanthichthys  Bertelsen  1951:74,  94,  fig.  49  (subgenus  Leptacanthichthys  given  generic 
status;  type  species  Dolopichthys  gracilispinis  Regan  1925,  by  monotypy). 

Diagnosis  for  females  (based  largely  on  osteological  evidence  presented  by 
Pietsch  1974). — The  genus  Leptacanthichthys  differs  from  other  one irodids  by  having 
a well-developed  mandibular  spine  that  is  considerably  longer  than  the  quadrate  spine 
(Fig.  5B).  In  addition,  Leptacanthichthys  is  unique  in  having  the  following  combi- 
nation of  characters:  snout  long,  dorsal  profile  of  frontal  bones  nearly  linear;  gape  of 
mouth  extending  past  eye;  length  of  maxillomandibular  ligament  greater  than  half 
length  of  premaxillary  (Fig.  3D)  hyomandibular  with  a double  head;  anterior  end  of 
ptergiophore  of  illicium  exposed,  its  posterior  end  concealed  under  skin;  illicium 
length  19.2-24.1  per  cent  of  SL;  lower  jaw  with  a small  symphysial  spine;  sphenotic 
spines  well  developed;  angular  spines  absent;  vomerine  teeth  present;  pharyngobran- 
chial  I absent;  pharyngobranchials  II  and  III  present  and  toothed;  epibranchial  teeth 
absent;  hypobranchial  II  present;  pectoral-fin  lobe  long  and  narrow,  longer  than  the 
longest  rays  of  pectoral  fin;  suboperculum  short  and  broad,  upper  end  rounded  to 
bluntly  pointed,  lower  end  without  anterior  spine  or  projection  (Fig.  6D-F)  anal  fin 
with  5 rays,  rarely  6;  skin  naked  (embedded  dermal  spines  cannot  be  detected  mi- 
croscopically in  bleached  and  stained  skin),  covering  caudal  fin  to  some  distance  from 
fin  base. 

Diagnosis  for  males  (based  on  a single  known  male  in  late  metamorphosis,  par- 
asitically  attached  to  a sexually  mature  female,  LACM  33625-2;  Pietsch  1976  figs. 
2-5). — Posterior  nostril  well  separated  from  eye;  upper  end  of  suboperculum  rounded; 
6 lower  denticles;  gill  cover  pigmented  with  slightly  darker  pigmentation  along  pos- 
terior margin  of  suboperculum;  dorsal  pigment  restricted  to  upper  part  of  body  ex- 
tending beneath  base  of  dorsal  fin  and  just  past  anterior  base  of  anal  fin  with  a more 
heavily  pigmented  dorsal  and  ventral  group  of  melanophores  near  hypural  plate;  per- 
itoneum pigmented. 

Larvae.  — Unknown. 


20 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  297 


Leptacanthichthys  gracilispinis  (Regan) 

Figures  3D,  5B,  6E-H,  13D,  16-18 
Tables  1 , 2 

Dolopichthys  gracilispinis  Regan  1925:563  (original  description;  two  specimens;  lectotype  des- 
ignated by  Bertelsen  1951,  ZMUC  P9295).  Regan  1926:27,  30,  pi.  V,  fig.  2 (brief  de- 
scription after  Regan  1925;  in  key). 

Dolopichthys  (Leptacanthichthys)  gracilispinis  Regan  and  Trewavas  1932:66,  80  fig.  128  (genus 
Dolopichthys  broadened  to  incorporate  five  subgenera,  amended  by  Bertelsen  1951;  de- 
scription after  Regan  1925,  1926;  in  key). 

Leptacanthichthys  gracilispinis  Bertelsen  1951:74,  94,  fig.  49  (subgenus  Leptacanthichthys 
given  generic  status;  description;  in  key).  Grey  1956:250  (synonymy;  distribution).  Pietsch 
1974:16-32,  82,  86-89,  Figs.  22,  34,  39c,  42,  51c,  55,  59,  103,  104,  tables  23,  24  (os- 
teology; relationships,  esca  figured;  in  key). 

Material. — Thirteen  females,  10.5-56.0  mm,  and  a parasitic  male  in  late  met- 
amorphosis, 7.5  mm. 

Lectotype. — ZMUC  P9295,  52.0  mm;  DANA  Station  1206(3);  Gulf  of  Panama, 
6°  40'  N,  80°  47'  W;  3500  m wire;  1845  hr;  14  January  1922. 

Paralectotype. — BMNH  1925.8.11.14,  43.0  mm,  DANA  Station  1358(5);  north 
Atlantic,  28°  15'  N,  56°  00'  W;  3000  m wire;  1530  hr;  2 June  1922. 

Non-type  material. — ROM  27284,  54.0  mm \ BRANDAL  Tow  20;  43°  23'  N,  52° 
30'  W;  Engel  trawl,  0-1050  m;  25  July  1968.  ROM  27293,  43.0  mm;  BRANDAL 
Tow  22;  44°  00'  N,  57°  52'  W;  Engel  trawl,  0-1000  m;  26  July  1968.  ROM  27274, 
41.0  mm;  BRANDAL  Tow  14;  46°  00'  N,  44°  30'  W;  Engel  trawl,  0-1000  m;  18  July 
1968. 

LACM  33625-2,  female,  56.0  mm,  with  parasitic  male,  7.5  mm;  VELERO  IV 
Station  19009;  8°  10'  N,  86°  00'  W;  3 m IKMT,  0-750  m;  0625  hr;  24  May  1973. 
LACM  34275-1,  27.0  mm;  VITYAZ  Cruise  24,  Station  3573,  Sample  50;  38°  04'  N, 
144°  13'  E;  1.6  m conical  ring  net,  0-3000  m;  bottom  depth  5660-5760  m;  0950-1530 
hr;  4 May  1957.  LACM  32776-1,  22.0  mm;  TERITU  Cruise  Blood,  Sweat,  and  Tears, 
Sample  70-7-6;  21°  20' -30'  N,  158°  20-30'  W;  2 m IKMT,  0-1250  m;  0746-1200  hr; 
6 July  1970. 


Figure  16.  Leptacanthichthys  gracilispinis,  LACM  33625-2,  56.0  mm.  Stalk  of  tissue  protrud- 
ing from  belly  bears  embedded  bones  of  upper  jaw  of  a parasitic  male  (see  Pietsch  1976). 


1978 


N.  Pacific  Ocean  Ceratioid  Anglerfish 


21 


Figure  17.  Esca  of  Leptacanthichthys  gracilispinis,  LACM  32776-1,  22.0  mm. 


SIO  60-235,  13.0  mm;  TETHYS  Expedition;  0°  08.5'  S,  138°  50.9'  W;  0-2100 
m;  3 - 4 July  1960.  SIO  68-476,  10.5  mm;  STYX  Expedition  VII-40;  22°  00'  N, 
171°  40'  E;  3 m IKMT,  0-1250  m;  bottom  depth  3660  m;  0640-1300  hr;  15  September 

1968. 

CAS-SU  43423,  14.0  mm;  GLADISFEN  Net  874;  32°  12'  N,  64°  36'  W;  11 
September  1930. 

IOS  uncatalogued,  12.5  mm;  DISCOVERY  H 8281-37;  31°  48'  N,  63°  37'  W; 
Rectangular  Midwater  Trawl  with  closing  device,  1240-1265  m;  0200-0500  hr;  19 
March  1973. 

MCZ  50705,  12.5  mm;  ATLANTIS  II  Cruise  49,  RHB  1939;  40°  22'  N,  58°  51' 
W;  3 m IKMT,  0-1040  m;  1235-1440  hr;  8 July  1969. 

Description  of  females. — Escal  bulb  with  a darkly  pigmented  streak  on  dorsal 
surface,  and  an  unpigmented,  compressed  posterior  appendage;  anterior  and  lateral 
appendages  absent  (Fig.  17;  Regan  and  Trewavas  1932:80  fig.  128). 


22 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  297 


Figure  18.  Distributions  of  “long-pectoraled”  oneirodid  genera.  A single  symbol  may  indicate  more  than  one  capture. 


1978 


N.  Pacific  Ocean  Ceratioid  Anglerfish 


23 


Operculum  bifurcate,  the  two  forks  forming  an  acute  angle  of  18°  to  27°;  length 
of  lower  fork  18.1-19.5  per  cent  of  SL;  length  of  lower  fork  64.4-70.5  per  cent  of 
length  of  lower  fork;  length  of  suboperculum  29.5-37.5  per  cent  of  length  of  lower 
fork  of  operculum  (Fig.  6D-F). 

Teeth  as  described  for  family;  D.  4-6,  of  10  specimens  counted  one  had  D.4; 
A. 5-6,  P.  18-21,  of  8 specimens  counted,  one  had  P.18;  pelvics  absent;  caudal  fin 
9 (2  unbranched  - 4 branched  - 3 unbranched);  branchiostegal  rays  6 (2  + 4). 

Fin  ray  counts  are  given  in  Table  1,  tooth  counts  and  body  measurements  in 
Table  2. 

Distribution. — In  the  Atlantic  Ocean,  L.  gracilispinis  seems  to  be  restricted  to 
waters  off  the  continental  slope  of  North  America  where  about  one-half  of  the  known 
material  has  been  collected  between  28°  and  46°  N,  as  far  east  as  44°  W.  The  re- 
maining material  is  from  the  north  Pacific  where  it  ranges  from  off  Japan  to  the  Gulf 
of  Panama  (Fig.  18).  Ninety-two  per  cent  of  the  known  material  was  captured  by  gear 
fished  below  1000  m;  62  per  cent  by  gear  fished  below  1200  m. 

DISCUSSION 

The  ceratioid  family  Oneirodidae  is  by  far  the  largest  and  most  diverse  of  the  1 1 
deepsea  anglerfish  families,  but  probably  remains  the  least  well  known.  With  the 
addition  of  Puck,  15  oneirodid  genera  are  now  recognized.  Eleven  of  these  genera 
consist  of  a single  species  and  of  these,  nine  are  based  on  only  one  or  two  adolescent 
or  adult  females.  The  addition  of  yet  another  monotypic  genus  based  on  two  female 
specimens  is  justified,  however,  as  this  new  form  clearly  cannot  reasonably  be  placed 
within  any  previously  described  genus.  Puck , Ctenochirichthys,  Chirophryne,  and 
Leptacanthichthys  share  an  unusually  elongate  pectoral- fin  lobe  that  bears  the  fin  rays 
along  its  dorsal  margin.  A similar  arrangement  is  not  found  in  any  other  ceratioid;  it 
is  mainly  because  of  the  common  occurrence  of  this  derived  character  complex  that 
these  four  genera  are  thought  to  form  a natural  assemblage.  Within  this  group  of  four 
genera,  Puck  appears  to  be  most  closely  related  phylogenetically  to  Ctenochirichthys . 
These  two  genera  share  a modification  of  the  jaw  mechanism  in  which  the  gape  of 
the  mouth  is  considerably  shorter,  but  at  the  same  time,  wider,  relative  to  other  onei- 
rodids.  In  addition,  Puck  and  Ctenochirichthys  share  an  elongate  suboperculum,  un- 
like the  short  and  broad  suboperculum  of  Chirophryne  and  Leptacanthichthys . 

Puck  appears  to  be  intermediate  in  many  ways  between  more  generalized  onei- 
rodid genera,  especially  Danaphryne,  and  the  other  three,  more  specialized  “long- 
pectoraled”  genera.  Puck  is  similar  to  Danaphryne  and  unlike  Leptacanthichthys  in 
the  shape  and  relative  size  of  the  bones  of  the  ethmoid  region,  in  the  shape  and  position 
of  the  frontals,  and  in  the  length  and  depth  of  the  cranium  and  elements  of  the  man- 
dibular, palatine,  and  hyoid  arches.  Puck,  on  the  other  hand,  shares  the  specialized 
pectoral  lobe  with  Ctenochirichthys,  Chirophryne,  and  Leptacanthichthys  as  well  as 
the  modification  of  the  jaw  mechanism  of  Ctenochirichthys. 

Although  apparently  most  closely  related  to  Puck,  probably  the  least  derived  of 
the  four  “long-pectoraled”  genera,  Ctenochirichthys  is  considered  the  most  derived 


24 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  297 


member  of  the  group  in  having  reduced  sphenotic  and  articular  spines,  a reduced 
number  of  vomerine  teeth,  a considerably  more  elongate  pectoral  lobe,  a secondarily 
derived  increase  in  the  number  of  pectoral-fin  rays,  and  a more  elongate  illicium. 

Little  can  be  said  concerning  relationships  of  Chirophryne,  known  from  only  two 
small,  adolescent  females.  It  is  perhaps  intermediate  between  Puck  and  Ctenochirich- 
thys  on  one  hand,  with  which  it  shares  convex  frontal  bones,  and  Leptacanthichthys 
on  the  other,  with  which  it  shares  a similar  jaw  mechanism  and  similarly- shaped  sub- 
opercular  bones. 

Leptacanthichthys  is  derived  and  unique  among  “long-pectoraled”  oneirodid 
genera  in  having  a nearly  linear  profile  of  the  frontal  bones;  it  is  unique  among  onei- 
rodids  in  having  a well-developed  mandibular  spine  that  is  considerably  longer  than 
the  quadrate  spine. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I thank  E.  Bertelsen,  Robert  J.  Lavenberg  and  Camm  C.  Swift  for  critically 
reading  the  manuscript.  The  following  people  and  institutions  provided  study  material: 
E.  Bertelsen  (ZMUC);  Robert  J.  Lavenberg  and  Jerry  W.  Neumann  (LACM);  Richard 
H.  Rosenblatt  (SIO);  Alwyne  Wheeler  (BMNH);  Nigel  Merrett  and  Julian  Badcock 
(IOS);  William  N.  Eschmeyer  and  Tomio  Iwamoto  (CAS);  Thomas  A.  Clarke  (Hawaii 
Institute  of  Marine  Science);  W.  B.  Scott  (ROM);  and  Karsten  E.  Hartel  (MCZ). 
Special  thanks  go  to  N.  V.  Parin,  of  the  Institute  of  Oceanography  of  the  Academy 
of  Sciences  of  the  USSR,  Moscow,  for  his  gift  of  the  holotype  of  Puck  pinnata  to  the 
Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County;  and  to  Richard  Rosenblatt  for  al- 
lowing me  to  clear  and  stain  the  second  known  specimen  of  Puck.  Figures  9-11,  13- 
14,  and  16  were  made  by  Patricia  Chaudhuri.  The  work  was  supported  by  a grant 
from  the  National  Science  Foundation,  No.  GB-40700.  Partial  assistance  from  the 
William  F.  Milton  Fund  of  Harvard  University  and  the  Johannes  Schmidt  Fund  of  the 
University  of  Copenhagen  is  also  gratefully  acknowledged. 

LITERATURE  CITED 


Beebe,  W.  and  J.  Crane  1947.  Eastern  Pacific  Expedition  of  the  New  York  Zoological  So- 
ciety. XXXVII.  Deep-sea  ceratioid  fishes.  Zoologica,  N.Y.  31(1 1):  1 5 1 — 1 82. 

Bertelsen,  E.  1951.  The  ceratioid  fishes.  Ontogeny,  taxonomy,  distribution  and  biology.  Dana 
Rept.  39:1-276. 

Bradbury,  M.  G.  1967.  The  genera  of  batfishes  (family  Ogcocephalidae).  Copeia  1967: 
399-422. 

Bussing,  W.  A.  1965.  Studies  of  the  midwater  fishes  of  the  Peru-Chile  Trench.  Biol.  Antarctic 
Seas  II.  Amer.  Geophys.  Union  Res:  Ser.  5:185-227. 

Garman,  S.  1899.  Reports  on  an  exploration  of  the  west  coasts  of  Mexico,  Central  and  South 
America,  and  off  the  Galapagos  Islands,  in  charge  of  Alexander  Agassiz,  by  the  U.S.  Fish 
Commission  steamer  “Albatross”  during  1891,  Lieut.  Commander  Z.  L.  Tanner,  U.S.N., 
commanding.  XXVI.  The  fishes.  Mus.  Comp.  Zool.,  Mem.  24:1-431. 

Grey,  M.  1956.  The  distribution  of  fishes  found  below  a depth  of  2000  meters.  Fieldiana,  Zool. 
36(2):75-337. 


1978 


N.  Pacific  Ocean  Ceratioid  Anglerfish 


25 


Pietsch,  T.  W.  1972.  A review  of  the  monotypic  deep-sea  anglerfish  family  Centrophrynidae: 
taxonomy,  distribution  and  osteology.  Copeia  1972:17-47. 

1974.  Osteology  and  relationships  of  ceratioid  anglerfishes  of  the  family  Oneirodidae 

with  a review  of  the  genus  Oneirodes  Liitken.  Nat.  Hist.  Mus.  Los  Angeles  Co.,  Sci.  Bull. 
18:1-113. 

1976.  Dimorphism,  parasitism,  and  sex:  reproductive  strategies  among  deep-sea  cer- 
atioid anglerfishes.  Copeia  1976:  781-793. 

Regan,  C.  T.  1925.  New  ceratioid  fishes  from  the  N.  Atlantic,  the  Caribbean  Sea,  and  the  Gulf 
of  Panama,  collected  by  the  “Dana.”  Ann.  Mag.  Nat.  Hist.,  Ser.  8,  8(62):561-567. 
. 1926.  The  pediculate  fishes  of  the  suborder  Ceratioidea.  Dana  Oceanog.  Rept. 

2:1-45. 

Regan,  C.  T.  and  E.  Trewavas.  1932.  Deep-sea  anglerfish  (Ceratioidea).  Dana  Rept.  2:1- 
113. 

Taylor,  W.  R.  1967.  An  enzyme  method  of  clearing  and  staining  small  vertebrates.  U.S.  Nat. 
Mus.,  Proc.  122:1-17. 

Accepted  for  publication  January  16,  1977. 


507  s 13 
C%L%G% 


NUMBER  298 
MAY  22,  1978 


REPRODUCTION  IN  MACROGEN IOGLOTTUS  ALIPIOI  CARVALHO 

(ANURA,  LEPTODACTYLIDAE) 


By  J.  Paul  Abravaya  and  James  F.  Jackson 


NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCICNCC 


Published  by  the  NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM 
OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007 


SERIAL  PUBLICATIONS  OP  THE 
NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OP  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 


Prior  to  November  30,  1973,  publications  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  have  appeared 
under  various  formats — Leaflet  Series,  Museum  Graphic,  Science  Series,  Study  Guides,  Con- 
tributions in  Science,  Contributions  in  History,  Science  Bulletins,  unnumbered  catalogs  of 
exhibitions,  and  other  miscellaneous  publications.  The  Museum  now  publishes  the  following 
serials  at  irregular  intervals  as  CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE,  HISTORY  BULLETINS, 
SCIENCE  BULLETINS,  EDUCATION  SERIES,  HISTORY  SERIES,  and  SCIENCE  SE- 
RIES. The  Contributions  are  short  papers  of  octavo  size.  The  Bulletins  are  longer,  compre- 
hensive papers  of  quarto  size.  The  Series  are  papers  of  variable  lengths  of  quarto  or  larger 
size.  Papers  in  each  serial  are  numbered  separately  and  consecutively. 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  contain  articles  in  the  earth  and  life  sciences,  presenting 
results  of  original  research.  Emphasis  is  intended  principally  for  papers  allied  to  biosystematic 
research,  but  other  subjects  and  review-oriented  ones  will  be  considered.  Number  1 was  issued 
on  January  23,  1957.  Contributions  must  be  not  less  than  8 nor  exceed  72  printed  pages. 


INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  AUTHORS 

Acceptance  of  manuscripts  will  be  determined  by  the  significance  of  new  information.  Priority 
will  be  given  to  manuscripts  by  staff  members.  All  manuscripts  must  be  recommended  by  the 
curator  in  charge  of  each  discipline  or  by  the  Editorial  Board.  Manuscripts  must  conform  to 
the  specifications  listed  below.  They  will  be  examined  for  suitability  by  the  Editorial  Board 
and  will  include  review  by  specialists  outside  the  Museum. 

Authors  must  adhere  to  the  International  Code  of  Nomenclature  of  Bacteria  and  Viruses, 
International  Code  of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  and  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature, including  their  respective  recommendations.  Further,  authors  proposing  new  taxa  in 
a CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  must  indicate  that  all  primary  types  have  been  deposited 
in  an  appropriate  scientific  institution  of  their  choice  and  must  cite  that  institution  by  name. 

MANUSCRIPT  FORM. — (1)  In  preparation  of  copy  follow  the  1972  CBE  Style  Manual, 
third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapters  5 and  6.  (2)  Footnotes  should  be  avoided;  acknowledgments 
as  footnotes  will  not  be  accepted.  (3)  An  informative  abstract  must  be  included  for  all  papers. 
(4)  A Spanish  summary  is  required  for  all  manuscripts  dealing  with  Latin  American  subjects. 
Summaries  in  other  languages  are  not  required  but  are  strongly  recommended.  (5)  A differ- 
ential diagnosis  must  accompany  any  newly  proposed  taxon.  (6)  Submit  two  copies  of  manu- 
script. 

ILLUSTRATIONS. — All  illustrations,  including  maps  and  photographs,  will  be  referred  to 
as  figures.  All  illustrations  should  be  of  sufficient  clarity  and  in  proper  proportions  for  reduc- 
tion to  CONTRIBUTIONS  page  size.  In  preparing  illustrations  and  legends  consult  the  1972 
CBE  Style  Manual,  third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapter  5.  Submit  only  illustrations  made  with 
permanent  ink  and  glossy  photographic  prints  of  good  contrast.  Submit  duplicate  copies  of 
all  illustrations.  Original  illustrations  will  be  returned  after  the  manuscript  has  been  published. 

PROOF. — Authors  will  be  sent  galley  proofs  which  should  be  corrected  and  returned  promptly. 
No  changes  or  alterations,  other  than  typesetting  corrections,  will  be  allowed  unless  paid  by 
author.  Requests  for  reprints  may  be  placed  through  the  Editor. 

R.  Edward  Ostermeyer 
Editor 


All  communications  concerning  manuscripts  and  exchange  of  or  purchase  of  publications 
should  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Museum  Publications,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 

Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America  by  Chapman’s  Phototypesetting  on  70#  Patina  Book 


REPRODUCTION  IN  MACROGEN IOGLOTTUS  ALIPIOI  CARVALHO 
(ANURA,  LEPTODACTYLIDAE)1 

By  J.  Paul  Abravaya2  and  James  F.  Jackson3 


Abstract:  Mating  behavior,  mating  call,  and  larval  morphology  are  described 
for  the  leptodactylid  fro g Macrogenioglottus  alipioi  Carvalho.  The  mating  behavior 
is  conducted  in  a way  that  would  be  advantageous  in  a species  in  which  the  number 
of  eggs  oviposited  per  female  is  great  but  the  number  of  ovipositing  females  per  pond 
is  small.  Feeding  behavior  is  modified  for  the  capture  of  slow  moving  prey  such  as 
snails  and  earthworms.  The  sonogram  of  the  mating  call  of  M.  alipioi  is  similar  to 
that  of  Odontophrynus  americanus.  The  tadpoles  of  Macrogenioglottus  are  similar 
to  those  of  Odontophrynus , having  the  same  tooth  row  formula  and  similar  arrange- 
ment of  labial  papillae.  They  differ,  however,  in  the  position  of  the  spiracle  and  the 
vent.  A review  of  the  taxonomic  history  of  M.  alipioi  combined  with  new  data  sug- 
gests a close  relationship  between  Macrogenioglottus  and  Odontophrynus. 


INTRODUCTION 

Although  Macrogenioglottus  alipioi  Carvalho  was  described  30  years  ago  (Car- 
valho 1946)  and  has  been  considered  of  no  small  interest  to  anuran  phylogeny  (Reig 
1972;  Duellman  1975),  little  on  its  biology  has  been  published.  We  report  our  ob- 
servations on  reproduction  of  the  species  made  in  1974  at  the  Reserva  Biologica  Nova 
Lombardia,  Municipio  de  Santa  Teresa,  Espirito  Santo,  Brazil.  The  vegetation  of  the 
area  was  classified  as  Subtropical  Lower  Montane  Moist  Forest  by  the  Holdridge 
(1967)  system.  Because  of  the  extremely  dissected  topography,  the  only  lentic  water 
(other  than  that  in  tank  bromeliads)  is  found  in  oxbow  ponds  along  the  valley  streams. 
These  ponds  are  empty  much  of  the  year  and  receive  significant  amounts  of  water  only 
when  their  progenitory  streams  overflow  after  heavy  rains  characteristic  of  the  wet 
season.  Choruses  of  Macrogenioglottus  alipioi  were  heard  only  after  extremely  heavy 
rains  which  resulted  in  such  flooding. 

Our  observations  were  made  at  an  oxbow  pond  30  by  6 m and  less  than  a meter 
deep.  The  water  was  stained  by  tannic  acids  and  on  the  pond  bottom  was  a deep  layer 
of  organic  mud  and  decaying  plant  material.  The  elevation  of  the  pond  is  810  m. 

The  pond  was  visited  several  times  a month  between  June  1973  and  November 
1974.  No  reproductive  activity  was  noted  on  rainless  days  or  nights,  but  activity  was 


Review  Committee  for  this  Contribution 
Robert  L.  Bezy 
W.  Ronald  Heyer 
Roy  W.  Me  Diarmid 
John  W.  Wright 

2Research  Associate  in  Mammalogy,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County,  and  De- 
partment of  Biology,  California  State  University,  Northridge,  California  91234. 

department  of  Biology,  University  of  Southwestern  Louisiana,  Lafayette,  Louisiana  70504. 


2 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  298 


noted  on  the  two  visits  we  made  during  nights  of  substantial  rain,  and  during  one  day 
after  a heavy  rain. 

Specimens  of  adult  Macro genioglottus  alipioi  were  deposited  in  the  Museu  de 
Biologia  “Prof.  Mello  Leitao,’’  Santa  Teresa,  Brazil.  Eighteen  tadpoles  were  depos- 
ited in  the  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County  (LACM  121739). 

REPRODUCTIVE  BEHAVIOR 

On  the  night  of  4 January  1974  a chorus  of  6 male  M.  alipioi  was  heard.  All 
males  were  stationed  on  the  bank  within  a meter  of  the  water.  No  females  were  found 
at  the  pond,  but  a female  was  watched  for  an  hour  as  she  walked  several  hundred 
meters  along  a dirt  road  toward  the  chorus.  When  she  reached  the  point  on  the  road 
nearest  the  pond,  she  turned  uphill  and  proceeded  in  the  opposite  direction  from  the 
pond. 

On  10  February  1974  observations  were  made  at  the  pond  from  19:30  until  01:30 
(local  time)  of  the  next  day.  Three  calling  males  were  stationed  on  the  bank  at  the 
water’s  edge.  One  male  once  moved  into  the  pond  and  called  while  standing  in  water 
2-3  cm  deep.  An  amplexed  pair  was  located  in  the  pond  at  20:30.  Amplexus  is  ax- 
illary, the  male’s  forelegs  clasped  around  the  female  one-third  to  one-fourth  the  dis- 
tance between  her  fore-  and  hindlegs,  and  his  forefeet  placed  in  her  axillae.  Initially 
the  pair  floated  quietly  and  moved  only  every  five  minutes;  later  they  moved  once  or 
more  each  minute.  The  female  initiated  changes  of  location  by  swimming  or  walking 
one  to  several  meters  dragging  the  male  behind.  When  they  reached  a new  site,  ovi- 
position  usually  occurred.  When  she  stopped,  the  male  flexed  his  forelegs  and  pulled 
himself  forward  on  top  of  the  female.  While  in  this  position,  he  flexed  his  hindlegs 
and  brought  his  hindfeet  together  at  the  female’s  vent.  The  hindfeet  were  then  pushed 
directly  backward  in  a single  stroke  that  started  slowly  and  then  accelerated,  as  if  the 
male  were  conducting  eggs  or  sperm  posteriorly.  During  or  after  this  movement,  the 
male  slid  backwards  off  the  female.  Then  the  male  kicked  several  times  rapidly;  these 
kicks  were  sometimes  between  the  female’s  hindlegs  but  usually  lateral  to  them. 
Whether  the  male  is  distributing  sperm  over  the  eggs  or  whether  he  is  distributing  the 
eggs  through  the  water,  or  both,  was  impossible  to  determine.  The  number  of  eggs 
oviposited  at  each  site  was  not  determined  but  probably  is  small,  perhaps  less  than 
20.  Eggs  were  laid  in  short  strands  and  small  clusters,  2-eggs  thick.  They  adhered  to 
vegetable  debris  and  did  not  float.  The  amplexed  pair  was  collected  at  23:30  and  laid 
fertilized  eggs  in  the  plastic  collecting  bag.  A second  female  that  presumably  had  not 
oviposited  was  found  walking  toward  the  pond.  She  was  collected  and  found  to  contain 
approximately  3650  eggs. 

Although  we  have  no  data  on  tadpole  vagility  or  survivorship,  for  heuristic  pur- 
poses we  hypothesize  three  possible  adaptive  functions  of  the  multiple  oviposition. 
The  frequent  changes  of  oviposition  sites  and  the  deposition  of  eggs  in  small  batches 
could  function  to  reduce  the  probability  that  all  the  eggs  would  be  lost  due  to  pre- 
dation or  desiccation.  Spreading  the  tadpoles  around  the  pond  could  possibly  also 
function  to  minimize  competition  between  siblings.  Such  a function  would  be  advan- 
tageous in  a species  where  the  number  of  eggs  oviposited  per  female  is  great  but  the 


1978 


Reproduction  in  Macrogenioglottus  Alipioi  Carvalho 


3 


number  of  ovipositing  females  per  pond  is  small,  as  it  appears  to  be  inM,  alipioi  judg- 
ing from  our  observations  and  the  fact  that  the  type  specimens  were  a single  pair  col- 
lected in  amplexus  (Carvalho  1946).  In  a species  with  numerous  amplexing  pairs  per 
pond,  there  would  be  little  advantage  to  such  egg  dispersal  because  tadpoles  produced 
by  other  pairs  would  be  hatching  throughout  the  pond. 


MATING  CALL 

The  call  of  M.  alipioi  sounds  most  like  a fog  horn.  Figure  1 illustrates  the  son- 
ogram of  calls  recorded  on  a Uher  model  4000  at  an  ambient  temperature  of  17°-20°C 
on  10  February.  The  call  is  a series  of  pulsed  notes,  each  note  lasting  0.24-0.27 
seconds.  The  number  of  notes  in  the  call  varies  from  one  to  several  dozen.  When 
repeated,  the  notes  are  separated  by  intervals  of  0.54-0.58  seconds.  Maximum  sound 
energy  of  the  moderately  well-tuned  note  is  spread  over  the  frequency  range  230-800 
hz.  In  the  frequency  range  800-11 80  hz  exists  a component  of  weaker  intensity  with  a 
pulse  rate  of  195-230  pulses  per  second.  The  beginning  and  end  of  the  note  on  the 
sonogram  are  slightly  less  dark  than  the  middle,  indicating  weak  intensity  modulation. 
The  low  frequency-low  intensity  “echo”  that  appears  between  notes  on  the  sonogram 
(Fig.  1)  probably  originated  from  another  individual  in  the  chorus.  The  males  alternate 
their  calls  to  form  duets  and  triplets. 


NATURAL  HISTORY 

Fertilized  eggs  with  their  gelatinous  envelopes  averaged  2.2  mm  in  diameter. 
The  tadpoles  hatched  48-70  hours  after  fertilization.  In  the  laboratory,  tadpoles  grew 
even  when  the  only  nutrient  provided  was  organic  muck  from  a pond  bottom.  They 
refused  to  eat  meat  but  readily  accepted  fruit  of  avocado  and  papaya.  The  tadpoles 
stayed  near  the  bottom  of  the  aquarium  and  did  not  swim  much.  This  inactivity  may 
serve  a protective  function,  since  the  pond  had  a high  density  of  predaceous  Cera- 
tophrys  tadpoles.  Three  tadpoles  transformed  at  ages  of  86,  95,  and  127  days.  This 
rate  of  development  is  consistent  with  apparent  ecological  necessities,  since  the  oxbow 
ponds  are  nearly  dry  by  May.  The  snout- vent  lengths  of  the  transformed  frogs  were 
19.9,  19.8,  and  21.0  mm. 

Stomachs  of  5 adult  M.  alipioi  were  examined.  Two  were  empty;  one  contained 
2 earthworms;  one  contained  a small  snail  shell;  and  one  contained  the  central  spiral 
of  a snail  shell  and  part  of  an  earthworm.  An  adult  maintained  in  the  laboratory  ate 
snails  and  earthworms,  appearing  to  prefer  the  former.  It  attempted  to  eat  roaches  but 
was  not  often  successful  in  picking  them  up.  When  a M.  alipioi  recognized  a potential 
food  item,  presumably  by  its  movement,  it  would  walk  close,  open  its  mouth,  and 
pick  up  the  item  through  a slow  extrusion  of  the  tongue.  Neither  the  very  deliberate 
feeding  movements  nor  the  dentition  and  lingual  morphology  of  M.  alipioi  appear 
adapted  for  capturing  fast-moving  prey.  Consequently,  we  believe  that  our  sample  of 
stomach  contents,  although  limited,  accurately  reflects  the  dietary  habits  of  the 
species. 


4 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  298 


Figure  1.  Sonogram  of  mating  call  of  Macrogenioglottus  alipioi  Carvalho.  10  February  1974;  Santa  Teresa,  Espirito,  Santo,  Brazil;  ambient  temp- 
erature 17-20  C. 


1978 


Reproduction  in  Macrogen ioglottus  Alipioi  Carvalho 


5 


DESCRIPTION  OF  TADPOLE 

The  tadpole  of  M.  alipioi  is  illustrated  in  figure  2.  The  tadpole  is  characterized 
as  follows  (terminology  of  Altig  1970):  sinistral  spiracle;  dextral  anus;  complex 
mouthparts;  labial  papillae  well  developed  laterally  and  complete  along  posterior  la- 
bium, absent  on  median  portion  of  anterior  labium;  labia  strongly  emarginate  laterally; 
tooth  rows  %;  second  anterior  tooth  row  with  a broad  A-2  gap;  first  posterior  tooth 
row  with  narrow  P-1  gap;  denticles  fine  and  short;  upper  jaw  narrow  and  smooth; 
lower  jaw  narrow  and  toothed  laterally;  eyes  and  nostrils  dorsal,  eyes  directed  dorsally; 
body  elliptical  in  dorsal  view;  somewhat  depressed  dorso-ventrally,  greatest  depth  .35- 
.43  of  standard  length;  dorsal  and  lateral  surface  of  body  brownish-grey,  reticulated 
with  non-pigmented  areas;  venter  transparent;  tail  musculature  pigmented  with  a series 
of  dark  grey  spots  or  bars  along  dorsal  portion  and  with  irregular  dark  grey  reticulation 
on  ventral  portion;  margins  of  tail  fin  spotted  irregularly  with  dark  grey;  standard 
length  12-18  mm;  tail  relatively  short,  1.24-1.40  of  standard  length.  The  tadpole  in 
Figure  2 is  at  stage  30  (Gosner  1960);  standard  length  13.9  mm,  tail  21.5  mm,  body 
width  9.8  mm.  Tadpoles  at  stage  25  show  considerable  variation  in  growth;  four  spec- 
imens examined  ranged  from  4.5  mm  to  11.5  mm  in  standard  length. 

EVOLUTIONARY  RELATIONSHIPS 

In  the  description  of  Macro genioglottus,  Carvalho  (1946)  assigned  the  genus  to 
the  Ceratophryidae  (=Ceratophrydidae)  and  considered  Odontophrynus  its  closest  rel- 
ative. Since  then  the  relationship  of  Macro genioglottus  to  Odontophrynus  has  been 
a subject  of  considerable  disagreement.  Lynch  (1971)  synonymized  Macro  genioglot- 
tus with  Odontophrynus  in  the  leptodactylid  subfamily  Telmatobiinae  which  was  sep- 
arated from  the  subfamily  Ceratophryinae.  From  the  appendix  of  his  paper  one  would 
assume  that  this  synonymy  was  made  without  examination  of  specimens  of  Macro- 
genioglottus . This  presumably  is  the  reason  that  some  of  the  characters  in  his  diag- 
nostic definition  of  Odontophrynus  (sensu  lato)  actually  exclude  Macro  genioglottus . 
For  example,  Macro  genioglottus  is  considerably  larger  (Carvalho  1946)  and  falls  out- 
side Lynch’s  size  range  for  Odontophrynus , and  the  inner  metatarsal  tubercle  of  Mac- 
ro genioglottus,  though  enlarged,  is  not  spade-like.  Reig  (1972)  on  the  other  hand 
made  a detailed  anatomical  comparison  of  Macro genio glottus , Odontophrynus,  Cer- 
atophrys,  and  Bufo.  He  concluded  that  similarities  between  Macro  genio  glottus  and 
Odontophrynus  are  convergent  and  that  Macro  genioglottus  resembles  a hypothetical 
taxon  representing  the  ancestral  bufonoid  stock.  He  proposed  elevating  Macro  gen- 
io glottus  to  familial  rank  placing  it  together  with  the  Bufonidae,  Atelopodidae  and 
Ceratophrynidae  in  the  superfamily  Bufonoidea,  retaining  Odontophrynus  in  the 
Leptodactyloidea. 

Martin  (1972)  used  evidence  from  laryngeal  anatomy  and  function,  and  from 
karyotypes  (Bogart  1967)  to  suggest  that  Odontophrynus,  as  well  as  Macrogenio- 
glottus,  are  close  to  the  base  of  the  bufonid -Atelopus  radiation.  He  felt  that  anatomical 
evidence  (Reig  1972)  actually  supported  this  conclusion  and  that  Reig’s  suggestion 
of  convergence  between  Macro  genio  glottus  and  Odontophrynus  was  untenable. 


6 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  298 


Figure  2.  Stage  30  larva  of  Macro genioglottus  alipioi  Carvalho  (LACM  121739). 


1978 


Reproduction  in  Macrogen ioglottus  Alipioi  Carvalho 


7 


Heyer  (1975)  did  not  examine  specimens  of  Macro genioglottus  but  using  the  data 
provided  by  Reig  (1972)  suggested  that  within  the  New  World  Leptodactylidae  Mac- 
ro genioglottus  has  affinities  with  Ceratophrys,  Lepidobatrachus , Odontophrynus 
and  Proceratophrys.  He  did  not  consider  Macro  genioglottus  and  Odontophrynus  to 
be  congeneric. 

The  tadpole  of  Macro  genioglottus  is  quite  similar  to  those  of  Odontophrynus 
examined  by  us  and  described  by  Savage  and  Cei  (1965).  It  has  the  same  tooth  row 
formula,  a similar  arrangement  of  labial  papillae  and  the  labia  are  emarginate  as  in 
O.  occidentalis  and  O.  americanus. 

It  differs  principally  by  having  a shorter  tail  (1.24-1.40  standard  length  in  Mac- 
ro genioglottus  versus  1.30-2.15  in  Odontophrynus ) and  finer  denticles.  Viewed  lat- 
erally, the  spiracle  opening  of  Macro  genioglottus  is  clearly  at  a level  dorsal  to  the 
mouth,  whereas  in  Odontophrynus  the  spiracle  opening  is  at  the  same  level  as  the 
mouth.  There  appears  to  be  confusion  regarding  the  position  of  the  vent  in  Odonto- 
phrynus. Savage  and  Cei  (1965)  stated  that  it  is  median.  Lynch  (1971:26)  called  the 
vent  dextral  for  the  genus  Odontophrynus  but  gave  a median  vent  as  a character  diag- 
nostic for  the  tribe  Odontophrynini  (Lynch  1971:131).  After  examining  tadpoles  of 
Odontophrynus  americanus  (LACM  28060),  O.  cultripes  (LACM  28059),  and  O. 
occidentalis  (LACM  28068),  we  consider  all  to  be  weakly  dextral.  Regardless  of 
whether  the  vent  of  Odontophrynus  is  considered  median  or  dextral,  it  is  clearly  less 
extremely  dextral  than  the  vent  of  Macro  genioglottus . 

The  mating  calls  of  Odontophrynus  americanus  and  O.  occidentalis  have  been 
described  by  Barrio  (1964).  These  calls  have  similarities  to  that  of  Macro  genioglottus 
in  consisting  of  several  unmodulated  notes  repeated  at  regular  intervals  and  in  having 
a dominant  frequency  between  400-1200  hz.  The  call  ofO.  occidentalis  is  least  similar 
since  it  has  a very  short  interval  between  the  notes  (about  .04  seconds)  and  is  thus 
a trill.  The  inter-note  interval  of  O.  americanus  (about  0.4  seconds)  is  closer  to  that 
of  Macrogenioglottus . Both  Odontophrynus  species  differ  from  Macrogenioglottus  in 
producing  calls  with  complex  harmonics.  Of  the  two,  O.  americanus  is  again  the 
closer  to  Macrogenioglottus  by  having  a less  accentuated  harmonic  structure,  sug- 
gesting that  the  pulse  rate  is  similar  to  that  of  Macrogenioglottus . 

In  summary,  we  feel  that  the  weight  of  taxonomic  evidence  indicates  a close 
relationship  between  Macrogenioglottus  and  Odontophrynus  and  that  new  evidence 
from  larval  morphology  and  mating  call  support  this  conclusion.  However,  to  include 
Macrogenioglottus  in  the  genus  Odontophrynus,  as  presently  known,  would  seem  to 
violate  the  homogeneity  traditionally  expected  of  a genus  of  four  or  five  species. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 


We  are  grateful  to  Dr.  Jacques  Vielliard,  Laboratoire  de  Zoologie,  Ecole  Nor- 
male  Superieure,  Paris,  for  recording  the  mating  call  and  furnishing  the  sonogram. 
We  thank  Andrew  Starrett,  Anthony  Gaudin,  W.  Ron  Heyer  and  John  Wright  for 
useful  criticisms  of  the  paper.  To  Robert  Bezy  we  owe  special  thanks  for  his  critiques 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  298 


and  help  in  preparing  the  manuscript.  Field  work  was  supported  by  a grant  from 
Instituto  Brasileiro  de  Desenvolvimento  Florestal  to  Museu  de  Biologia  Mello-Leitao, 
Santa  Teresa,  Espirito  Santo.  We  thank  Augusto  Ruschi  for  aid  during  our  stay  at 
Museu  Mello-Leitao,  Mary  Butler  for  preparing  drawings  of  tadpoles,  Marianne 
Hata  and  Terri  Togiai  for  typing  the  manuscript. 


RESUMO 

O comportamento  nupcial,  o grito  nupcial  e a morfologia  larval  sao  descritos 
para  o anuro Macrogenioglottus  alipioi  Carvalho  (Leptodactylidae).  Na  Reserva  Nova 
Lombardia,  Santa  Teresa,  Espirito  Santo,  Brazil,  o cruzamento  ocorre  em  pequenas 
lagoas  formadas  pelo  transbordamento  dos  corregos  durante  a esta^ao  chuvosa.  O 
numero  de  pares  que  cruzam  em  cada  lagoinha  e baixo.  Amplexus  e axilario.  Cada 
femea  poe  mais  do  que  tres  mil  ovos,  mas  esses  sao  distribuidos  pela  lagoinha  em 
pequenas  por^oes  em  lugares  distintos.  O grito  nupcial  e baixo  (frequencia  230-800 
hz  tern  for^a  sonora  maxima)  e e repetido  varias  vezes.  A duragao  do  grito  e de  .24- 
.27  segundos  e o intervalo  entre  os  gritos  e de  .54-. 58  segundos.  O girino  e semelhante 
ao  girino  de  Odontophrynus , mas  existem  diferengas  na  localizafao  do  espiraculo  e 
do  anus.  Observagoes  no  laboratorio  e o exame  de  conteudos  estomacais  indicam  que 
os  adultos  alimentam-se  de  caracois  e minhocas.  Tanto  o grito  nupcial  como  a mor- 
fologia do  girino  de  Macrogenioglottus  sao  semelhantes  aos  de  Odontophrynus,  mas 
diferen^as  na  morfologia  adulta  exigem  que  se  os  mantenham  em  generos  separados. 


LITERATURE  CITED 


Altig,  R.  1970.  A key  to  the  tadpoles  of  the  continental  United  States  and  Canada.  Herpeto- 
logica,  26:180-207. 

Barrio,  A.  1964.  Characteres  eto-ecologicos  diverenciales  entre  Odontophrynus  americanus 
(Dumeril  et  Bibron)  y O.  occidentalis  (Berg)  (Anura,  Leptodactylidae).  Physis,  24:385— 
390. 

Bogart,  J.  P.  1967.  Chromosomes  of  the  South  American  amphibian  family  Ceratophridae  with 
a reconsideration  of  the  taxonomic  status  of  Odontophrynus  americanus . Canadian  Jour. 
Genet.  Cytol.,  9:531-542. 

Carvalho,  A.  L.  de.  1946.  Um  novo  genero  de  Ceratofridideo  do  sudeste  baiano.  Bol.  Museu 
Nac.,  N.  S.  Zool.,  Rio  de  Janeiro,  73:1-5. 

Duellman,  W.  E.  1975.  On  the  classification  of  frogs.  Occas.  Papers  Mus.  Nat.  Hist.  Univ. 
Kansas,  42:1-14. 

Gosner,  K.  L.  1960.  A simplified  table  for  staging  anuran  embryos  and  larvae  with  notes  on 
identification.  Herpetologica,  16:183-190. 

Heyer,  W.  R.  1975.  A preliminary  analysis  of  the  intergeneric  relationships  of  the  frog  family 
Leptodactylidae.  Smithsonian  Contr.  Zool.,  199:1-55. 

Holdridge,  L.  R.  1967.  Life  zone  ecology.  Tropical  Science  Center,  San  Jose,  Costa  Rica. 

Lynch,  J.D.  1971.  Evolutionary  relationships,  osteology,  and  zoogeography  of  leptodactylid 
frogs.  Misc.  Publ.  Mus.  Nat.  Hist.  Univ.  Kansas,  53:1-238. 


1978 


Reproduction  in  Macrogenioglottus  Alipioi  Carvalho 


9 


Martin,  W.  F.  1972.  Evolution  of  vocalization  in  the  genus  Bufo\  pp.  279-309  in  Evolution 
in  the  genus  Bufo  (W.  F.  Blair,  ed.),  Univ.  of  Texas  Press,  Austin  and  London,  460  pp. 
Reig,  O.  A.  1972.  Macrogenioglottus  and  the  South  American  bufonid  toads;  pp.  14-36  in 
Evolution  in  the  genus  Bufo  (W.  F.  Blair,  ed.),  Univ.  of  Texas  Press,  Austin  and  London, 
460  pp. 

Savage,  J.  M.  and  J.  M.  Cei.  1965.  A review  of  the  leptodactylid  frog  genus,  Odontophrynus . 
Herpetologica,  21:178-195. 

Accepted  for  publication  February  18,  1977. 


50%W 


NUMBER  299 
JUNE  16,  1978 


? 

I 

Nl| 

A NEOGENE  SECTION 
NORTHEASTERN  SAN  CLEMENTE  ISLAND,  CALIFORNIA 


By  Takeo  Susuki  and  Carol  J.  Stadum 


NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE 


Published  by  the  NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM 
OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007 


SERIAL  PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE 
NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 


Prior  to  November  30,  1973,  publications  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  have  appeared 
under  various  formats — Leaflet  Series,  Museum  Graphic,  Science  Series,  Study  Guides,  Con- 
tributions in  Science,  Contributions  in  History,  Science  Bulletins,  unnumbered  catalogs  of 
exhibitions,  and  other  miscellaneous  publications.  The  Museum  now  publishes  the  following 
serials  at  irregular  intervals  as  CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE,  HISTORY  BULLETINS, 
SCIENCE  BULLETINS,  EDUCATION  SERIES,  HISTORY  SERIES,  and  SCIENCE  SE- 
RIES. The  Contributions  are  short  papers  of  octavo  size.  The  Bulletins  are  longer,  compre- 
hensive papers  of  quarto  size.  The  Series  are  papers  of  variable  lengths  of  quarto  or  larger 
size.  Papers  in  each  serial  are  numbered  separately  and  consecutively. 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  contain  articles  in  the  earth  and  life  sciences,  presenting 
results  of  original  research.  Emphasis  is  intended  principally  for  papers  allied  to  biosystematic 
research,  but  other  subjects  and  review-oriented  ones  will  be  considered.  Number  1 was  issued 
on  January  23,  1957.  Contributions  must  be  not  less  than  8 nor  exceed  72  printed  pages. 


INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  AUTHORS 

Acceptance  of  manuscripts  will  be  determined  by  the  significance  of  new  information.  Priority 
will  be  given  to  manuscripts  by  staff  members.  All  manuscripts  must  be  recommended  by  the 
curator  in  charge  of  each  discipline  or  by  the  Editorial  Board.  Manuscripts  must  conform  to 
the  specifications  listed  below.  They  will  be  examined  for  suitability  by  the  Editorial  Board 
and  will  include  review  by  specialists  outside  the  Museum. 

Authors  must  adhere  to  the  International  Code  of  Nomenclature  of  Bacteria  and  Viruses, 
International  Code  of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  and  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature, including  their  respective  recommendations.  Further,  authors  proposing  new  taxa  in 
a CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  must  indicate  that  all  primary  types  have  been  deposited 
in  an  appropriate  scientific  institution  of  their  choice  and  must  cite  that  institution  by  name. 

MANUSCRIPT  FORM. — (1)  In  preparation  of  copy  follow  the  1972  CBE  Style  Manual, 
third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapters  5 and  6.  (2)  Footnotes  should  be  avoided;  acknowledgments 
as  footnotes  will  not  be  accepted.  (3)  An  informative  abstract  must  be  included  for  all  papers. 
(4)  A Spanish  summary  is  required  for  all  manuscripts  dealing  with  Latin  American  subjects. 
Summaries  in  other  languages  are  not  required  but  are  strongly  recommended.  (5)  A differ- 
ential diagnosis  must  accompany  any  newly  proposed  taxon.  (6)  Submit  two  copies  of  manu- 
script. 

ILLUSTRATIONS.— All  illustrations,  including  maps  and  photographs,  will  be  referred  to 
as  figures.  All  illustrations  should  be  of  sufficient  clarity  and  in  proper  proportions  for  reduc- 
tion to  CONTRIBUTIONS  page  size.  In  preparing  illustrations  and  legends  consult  the  1972 
CBE  Style  Manual,  third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapter  5.  Submit  only  illustrations  made  with 
permanent  ink  and  glossy  photographic  prints  of  good  contrast.  Submit  duplicate  copies  of 
all  illustrations.  Original  illustrations  will  be  returned  after  the  manuscript  has  been  published. 

PROOF. — Authors  will  be  sent  galley  proofs  which  should  be  corrected  and  returned  promptly. 
No  changes  or  alterations,  other  than  typesetting  corrections,  will  be  allowed  unless  paid  by 
author.  Requests  for  reprints  may  be  placed  through  the  Editor. 


All  communications  concerning  manuscripts  and  exchange  of  or  purchase  of  publications 
should  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Museum  Publications,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 

Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America  by  Chapman’s  Phototypesetting  on  70#  Patina  Book 


Edward  Ostermeyer 
Editor 


A NEOGENE  SECTION,  NORTHEASTERN  SAN  CLEMENTE 
ISLAND,  CALIFORNIA1 

By  Takeo  Susuki2  and  Carol  J.  Stadum3 


Abstract:  A discontinuous  section  of  Miocene,  Pliocene,  Pleistocene,  and  Re- 
cent sediments  overlies  rhyolite  0.9  to  2.5  kilometers  south  of  the  Naval  Ordinance 
Test  Station  Pier  in  the  area  of  Randall  Blockhouse,  northeastern  San  Clemente  Is- 
land, Los  Angeles  County,  California.  Poorly  consolidated  orange  sandstone  con- 
taining the  Miocene  mollusk  Pecten  ( Amussiopecten ) lompocensis  Arnold  and  marine 
limestone  lenses,  grades  upward  into  diatomaceous  shale  equivalent  to  the  Miocene 
Monterey  Formation.  Unconformably  overlying  the  Miocene  units  are  Pliocene  bio- 
clastic  sediments  containing  the  mollusks  ( Pecten ) ( P .)  bellus  (Conrad)  and  Pecten 
( Patinopecten ) healeyi  sanclementensis  n.  subsp.  Isolated  outcrops  of  Pleistocene 
sand,  containing  a molluscan  fauna,  correlate  with  the  Palos  Verdes  Sand  of  the  Los 
Angeles  Basin.  An  occurrence  of  a desmostylid  tooth  is  reported  and  illustrated. 


INTRODUCTION 

San  Clemente  Island,  the  southernmost  Channel  Island  off  the  southern  California 
coast,  is  approximately  96  km  south  and  west  of  Long  Beach.  (Figs.  1 ,2)  The  elongate 
island,  extending  northwest  to  southeast,  is  35  km  long  and  2 km  to  6.4  km  wide. 
Sediments  cover  the  slightly  tilted  and  gently  domed  block,  which  is  composed  of 
lava  flows,  tuffs,  and  breccias  that  have  been  dated  at  about  15.7  million  years  (Meri- 
field  and  others  1971).  More  than  twenty  marine  terraces  are  exposed  on  the  western 
slope  of  the  island,  while  the  eastern  flank  rises  steeply  from  the  northwest  trending 
San  Clemente  fault. 

During  a visit  to  the  island  in  April,  1975,  an  outcrop  of  Pliocene  biosediments 
was  located  in  a discontinuous  Neogene  section  by  the  junior  author.  The  occurrence 
of  these  strata  was  reported  by  Stadum  and  Susuki  (1976)  as  containing  mullusks  and 
brachiopods,  interbedded  in  sediments  composed  predominantly  of  bryozoans,  fora- 
minifers  and  echinoid  spines  of  Pliocene  age  and  the  authors’  findings  were  subse- 
quently confirmed  in  a later  publication  by  Vedder  and  Moore  (1976).  The  only  Chan- 
nel Island  known  to  contain  similar  age  strata  is  Santa  Cruz  Island  (Weaver  and  Myer 
1969).  An  extensive  field  investigation  was  undertaken  in  July  and  November,  1975, 
to  determine  the  areal  extent  of  the  discontinuous  Neogene  section.  The  Neogene 


1Review  Committee  for  this  Contribution 
Warren  O.  Addicott 
Jere  H.  Lipps 
Edward  C.  Wilson 

2Research  Associate  in  Invertebrate  Paleontology,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  and  Department  of  Geology,  University  of  California,  Los  Angeles,  California,  90024. 

3Huntington  Beach  High  School,  1905  Main  Street,  Huntington  Beach,  California,  92648. 


118°  117° 

Figure  1 . Index  map  showing  general  location  of  San  Clemente  Island. 


1978 


A Neogene  Section,  San  Clemente  Island 


3 


marine  mollusks  from  northeast  San  Clemente  Island  are  summarized  and  a new  Pli- 
ocene subspecies  is  described  and  illustrated. 

The  specimens  are  deposited  in  the  paleontology  collection.  Department  of  Ge- 
ology, University  of  California,  Los  Angeles. 


PREVIOUS  GEOLOGIC  INVESTIGATIONS 

The  earliest  publication  to  describe  the  San  Clemente  Island  lithology  was  Cooper 
(1865).  This  report  stated  that  the  “island  form  is  that  of  a terraced  table”  and  that 
the  rocks  are  composed  almost  entirely  of  basalt.  He  implied  that  the  scarcity  of  fossils 
was  apparently  due  to  lack  of  marine  sediments.  Lawson  (1893)  discussed  the  physi- 
ography in  detail  and  mentioned  fossiliferous  white  limestone  which,  he  thought,  was 
equivalent  to  the  mainland  Miocene  coastal  deposits.  Smith  (1898)  recognized  that 
a portion  of  the  island  was  composed  of  Miocene  sandstone,  shale,  and  limestone 
with  overlying  sediments  which  were  post-Pliocene  in  Age.  Olmsted  (1958)  distin- 
quished  the  lower  sedimentary  unit  as  middle  Miocene  and  the  unconsolidated  sand 
deposits  as  Pleistocene  (?). 

Mitchell  and  Lipps  (1965)  collected  numerous  Miocene  marine  vertebrates,  pe- 
lecypods,  algae,  and  microorganisms  from  the  Chalk  Canyon  area  (Horse  Cove)  and 
two  mid-island  basins.  They  stated  that  an  interval  of  geologic  history  “from  about 
the  end  of  the  middle  Miocene  to  about  500,000  years  or  so  ago”  is  missing.  Ocean- 
ographic surveys  by  Ridlon  (1968;  1969;  1972)  found  middle  Miocene  sedimentary 
rocks,  post-Miocene  sediments  of  undetermined  age,  and  Holocene  surficial  sediments 
offshore  near  Eel  Point.  Merifield  and  others  (1971)  emphasized  the  petrography  and 
structure  and  volcanic  rocks  on  the  central  part  of  the  island,  and  noted  the  presence 
of  Miocene  sediments  and  Quaternary  beach  sand.  Most  recently,  Vedder  and  others 
(1975),  and  Vedder  and  Moore  (1976)  discussed  Miocene  and  Pliocene  biostratig- 
raphy and  paleontology  of  the  island.  These  publications  did  not  include  the  Neogene 
sediments  south  of  Randall  Blockhouse  in  sections  RS-2  and  RS-3  of  this  paper. 


STRATIGRAPHY 

Introduction 

The  authors  have  used  abbreviations  for  four  sections  of  Neogene  sediments  ex- 
posed near  Randall  Blockhouse,  an  observation  structure  and  lighthouse  about  900 
m south  of  NOTS  (Naval  Ordinance  Test  Station)  Pier.  Neogene  sediments  overlie 
rhyolite  and  are  exposed  in  gullies  northwest,  west  and  south  of  Randall  Blockhouse. 
The  letters  “RS”  refer  to  “Randall  Section”,  with  the  number  indicating  the  location 
of  outcrop  (Fig.  3). 

RS-1  = Pliocene  sediments  in  roadcut  above  Randall  Blockhouse  and  a ravine 
just  to  the  west  of  the  roadcut.  (includes  localities  6316,  6318  and  6320). 

RS-2  = Miocene,  Pliocene  and  Pleistocene  in  a steep  gully  about  213  m south  of 
Randall  Blockhouse,  (includes  localities  6321  and  6327). 


4 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  299 


Figure  2.  Index  map  of  San  Clemente  Island  showing  some  of  the  prominent  landmarks. 


1978 


A Neogene  Section,  San  Clemente  Island 


5 


RS-3  = Miocene  beds  about  1525  m southeast  of  Randall  Blockhouse,  (locality 
6317). 

RS-4  = Miocene  strata  about  1585  m north  and  slightly  west  of  NOTS  Pier. 

Miocene  Sandstone 

The  base  of  the  Miocene  sedimentary  sequence  is  a coarse,  poorly-consolidated, 
unfossiliferous,  dark-gray  volcanic  sandstone  overlying  rhyolite  flow  lava.  The  basal 
sandstone  is  best  developed  at  RS-3  (Fig.  6)  with  a maximum  thickness  of  approxi- 
mately 1.2  m which  thins  northward  to  about  0.3  m at  RS-2,  within  a distance  of 
about  660  m.  This  basal  sandstone  was  not  recognized  by  Vedder  and  Moore  (1976) 
from  the  NOTS  Pier  area.  They  reported  shale  and  claystone  lying  unconformably  on 
the  rhyolite. 

Grading  upward  from  the  basal  volcanic  sandstone  is  a prominent  marker  bed 
of  loosely-consolidated  to  well-indurated,  medium  to  coarse  grained,  fossiliferous, 
orange  sandstone.  This  unit  is  best  exposed  at  RS-3  (4.5  m thick),  where  the  basal 
1.2  m has  abundant  Pecten  {Amussiopecten)  lompocensis  Arnold  (Figs.  12-17).  Echi- 
noid  spines,  rare  gastropod  nodes  similar  to  those  of  the  genus  Trophon,  marine  mam- 
mal bones  and  teeth,  shark  teeth,  and  fish  bones  occur  commonly  throughout  the 
sandstone.  At  section  RS-4,  where  the  orange  sand  is  approximately  1.5  m thick,  only 
a few  diagnostic  fragments  of  P.  (A.)  lompocensis  were  found.  Other  equivalent  lo- 
calities were  reported  by  Olmsted  (1958)  from  the  central  island  area,  including  his 
locality  F-3  which  contains  fragments  of  Chlamys  ( Lyropecten ) crassicardo  (Conrad), 
and  his  locality  F-2  from  which  he  reported  “abundant  shell  fragments,  chiefly  pec- 
tinids,  and  scattered  mammalian  bones.”  Vedder  and  Moore  (1976)  reported  Lyro- 
pecten crassicardo  (Conrad),  Amussiopecten  cf.  A.  vanvlecki  (Arnold),  and  Crassos- 
trea  cf.  C.  freudenbergi  (Hertlein  and  Jordan)  in  equivalent  beds  from  the  China 
Canyon  section,  USGS  loc.  M6505. 

Near  the  base  of  the  orange  sandstone  are  dense  limestone  lenses  containing 
Ostrea  sp.  with  other  unidentifiable  shell  fragments.  These  lenses  have  been  observed 
on  the  north  wall  of  the  most  southerly  exposure  at  RS-3,  and  near  the  pier  at  Wilson 
Cove.  Olmsted  (1958)  reported  limestone  at  his  locality  F-3,  overlying  “gritty  an- 
desitic sandstone  about  2.5  m thick  that  in  turn  overlies  a flow  of  platy-jointed  an- 
desite.” Calcarenite  deposits  overlying  andesite  flow  in  China  Canyon  (Vedder  and 
Moore  1976)  appear  to  be  similar  to  limestone  lenses  at  RS-3  and  Wilson  Cove.  Bram- 
lette  (1946)  established  limestone  “reef”  structures  at  the  base  of  the  Monterey  For- 
mation, generally  as  a boundary  between  lower  and  middle  Miocene  sediments.  Sim- 
ilar middle  Miocene  structures  are  found  locally  in  the  Palos  Verdes  Hills  areas 
(Bramlette  1946)  and  in  southwestern  Orange  County  (Morton  and  others  1974). 

The  authors  collected  a large,  shattered  desmostylid  tooth  (Figs.  27,  28,  29)  from 
a grayish  sandstone  (loc.  6363)  about  a meter  above  beds  containing  P.  (A.)  lom- 
pocensis and  stratigraphically  below  the  silty  diatomaceous  shale.  The  tooth  was  ex- 
amined by  L.  G.  Barnes,  Los  Angeles  County  Museum  of  Natural  History,  who  sug- 
gested that  the  specimen  could  be  Paleoparadoxia  tabatai,  whose  characteristic 
cingulae  have  been  worn  off  (personal  communication,  Mar.  24,  1977). 


6 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  299 


Miocene  Diatomaceous  Shale 

The  diatomaceous  shale  member  is  probably  the  most  widespread  sedimentary 
unit  within  the  area  investigated.  Vedder  and  others  (1975)  and  Vedder  and  Moore 
(1976)  have  correlated  this  unit  with  the  middle  Miocene  Monterey  Formation,  locally 
found  in  the  Palos  Verdes  Hills,  San  Joaquin  Hills,  and  Capistrano  syncline.  The 
representative  section  is  exposed  at  RS-3  with  a thickness  of  about  18  m and  con- 
formably overlying  orange  sand  which  becomes  finer  and  grades  upward  into  diato- 
maceous shale.  The  shale  is  interbedded  with  several  layers  (about  7 cm  thick)  of 
gray,  finely  laminated  chert  with  abundant  fish  scales.  Above  the  chert  layers,  four 
phosphate  nodule  layers  (each  about  2.5  cm  thick)  are  intercalated  with  the  shale.  A 
bluish,  unaltered  vitric  ash  layer  (15  cm  thick)  occurs  near  the  top  of  the  unit.  Fish 
remains,  shark  teeth,  and  marine  mammal  bones  and  teeth  are  common  through  the 
shale. 

Elsewhere,  the  shale  extends  north  and  south  of  NOTS  Pier,  and  is  exposed  at 
RS-2.  More  extensive  sections,  as  much  as  90  meters  in  thickness  (Mitchell  and  Lipps 
1965),  are  exposed  on  the  southern  part  of  the  island.  Vedder  and  Moore  (1976) 
extensively  examined  the  Horse  Cove  and  China  Canyon  diatomaceous  deposits, 
which  they  suggested  resemble  parts  of  the  Monterey  Shale  exposed  at  Newport  Bay 
and  in  the  Capistrano  syncline. 

The  depositional  sequence  of  orange  sand  with  limestone  lenses  overlain  by  dia- 
tomaceous shale  containing  chert,  phosphate  nodules,  and  vitric  ash  layers  is  equiv- 
alent to  the  depositional  sequence  of  middle  Miocene  units  in  the  El  Toro  and  San 
Joaquin  Hills  area  of  Orange  County  (Morton  and  others  1974;  Stadum  1975). 

Pliocene  Biogenic  Sediments 

The  Pliocene  bioclastic  outcrops  appear  to  be  restricted  to  the  eastern  flank  of 
the  central  island  region.  The  basal  bed  is  an  un sorted,  thin,  pebble  to  cobble  con- 
glomerate, composed  of  volcanic  clasts  uncomformably  overlying  the  Miocene  dia- 
tomaceous shale.  A complete  section,  exposed  in  a small  ravine  several  hundred  me- 
ters south  of  RS- 1 , is  approximately  30  m thick.  Although  the  bottom  and  top  contacts 
are  not  visible,  a better  exposed  section  is  in  a roadcut  to  Randall  Blockhouse  (RS- 
1)  (Fig.  9).  Pliocene  sediments  are  also  present  at  Lemon  Tank  Reservoir  (Vedder 
and  Moore  1976)  unconformably  overlying  Miocene  sandstone  on  the  northwest  wall. 
Vedder  and  Moore  (1976)  collected  well-preserved  P.  bellus,  P.  healeyi,  moulds  of 
minute  gastropods  Alvania  and  Bittium,  and  other  fossils  from  a truncated  calcarenite 
remnant  at  USGS  loc.  M6501  at  Lemon  Tank  Reservoir.  About  one  hundred  m east 
of  USGS  loc.  M6501,  the  authors  found  mixed  Pliocene-Pleistocene  sands  containing 
the  following  species:  Glycymeris  ( Axinola ) grewingki  Dali,  Cyclocardia  cf.  C.  ven- 
tricosa  Gould,  Pseudocardium  sp.,  Calliostoma  cf.  C.  gemmulatum  Carpenter,  Cal- 
liostoma  cf.  C.  annulatum  Martyn,  Architectonica  cf.  A.  nobilis  Roding,  Haliotis  sp., 
Opalia  (O.)  xvroblexvskyi  (Mdrch),  Terebratalia  cf.  T.  occidentalis  Dali,  Laqueus  van- 
couveriensis  diegensis  Hertlein  and  Grant,  and  Paracyathus  cf.  P . stearnsii  Verrill. 

Biogenic  detritus  and  shells  compose  95%  of  the  gently  dipping,  massive,  coarse 
Pliocene  strata.  Where  firmly  cemented,  the  chalky-colored  biolith  forms  noticeable 


1978 


A Neogene  Section,  San  Clemente  Island 


7 


outcrops  with  rounded,  wave-cut  cavities  (Fig.  1 1)  greater  than  a meter  in  diameter. 
There  are  two  significant  conglomerate  beds  (Fig.  10),  with  a thickness  of  0.30  to 
1.0  M composed  of  dacite,  andesite,  and  rhyolite  clasts. 

The  poorly-sorted  bioclastic  sediments  are  predominantly  bryozoans,  foramini- 
fers,  and  echinoid  spines.  Within  this  unit,  there  are  four  fossiliferous  layers  con- 
taining the  Pliocene  guide  fossil  Pecten  ( P .)  bellus  (Conrad)  and  a new  subspecies 
of  Pecten  ( Patinopecten ) healeyi  Arnold.  Other  species  include  Pecten  cf.  P.  ( P .) 
lecontei  Arnold,  Chlamys  (C.)  opuntia  Dali,  Pododesmus  macroschisma  Deshayes, 
Mytilus  sp.,  Anomia  peruviana  d'Orbigny,  Hinnites  sp.,  Opalia  ( O .)  varicostata 
Steams,  Epitonium  ( Nitidiscala ) cf.  E.  ( N .)  indianorum  (Carpenter),  and  distinctive 
layers  of  the  brachiopods  (Fig.  8)  Laqueus  californianus  Koch,  L.  vancouveriensis 
diegensis  Hertlein  and  Grant,  and  Terebratalia  hemphilli  Dali.  All  invertebrates  are 
well-preserved.  Brachiopods  and  pelecypods  generally  are  articulated  and  faintly  re- 
tain their  original  colors. 

Although  similar  assemblages  are  found  in  Pliocene  marine  deposits  throughout 
southern  California  (Pico  Member  of  the  Fernando  Formation  in  the  Ventura  and  Los 
Angeles  Basins;  Santa  Barbara  Formation  in  the  Ventura  Basin;  “San  Diego”  For- 
mation in  the  western  Santa  Monica  Mountains;  Fernando  Formation  in  the  Palos 
Verdes  Hills  and  Orange  County;  and  Niguel  Formation  in  the  San  Joaquin  Hills)  the 
lithology  and  fossils  of  the  San  Clemente  Island  Pliocene  strata  appear  to  be  most 
similar  to  the  San  Diego  Formation  in  coastal  San  Diego  County.  Hertlein  and  Grant 
(1944)  described  the  San  Diego  Formation  as  deposits  containing  layers  of  conglom- 
erates and  lacking  fine  sediments  “which  indicates  a water  depth  from  low  tide  to 
possibly  fifty  fathoms.”  They  also  noted  the  occurrence  of  pockets,  seams,  and  rare 
beds  of  nearly  pure  white  marl  in  exposures  of  the  San  Diego  Formation  suggesting 
lithologic  similarity  to  the  San  Clemente  Island  Pliocene. 

In  a more  recent  report,  Hertlein  and  Grant  (1960)  listed  Pecten  ( P .)  bellus , 
Pecten  {Patinopecten)  healeyi,  Chlamys  (C .)  opuntia,  Laqueus  californianus,  L.  van- 
couveriensis diegensis,  bryozoans,  and  echinoids  from  the  San  Diego  Formation  ex- 
posed at  Pacific  Beach.  The  report  stated  that  species  of  the  brachiopod  genus  Laqueus 
(which  is  abundant  in  San  Clemente  Island  Pliocene  sediments)  “occur  at  moderate 
depths  on  clear  sea  bottoms  free  of  mud,  and  a greater  number  occur  in  warm  rather 
than  cold  water.”  By  comparing  the  similar  fauna  and  lithology  of  the  San  Diego 
Formation  with  San  Clemente  Island  Pliocene  sediments,  the  authors  suggest  that  the 
strata  were  deposited  in  a clear,  sublittoral  environment  that  was  slightly  warmer  than 
at  present. 

Olmsted  (1958)  separated  the  younger  deposits  into  Older  Sand  (Pleistocene)  and 
Younger  Sand  (Recent).  He  designated  the  older  deposits  as  chiefly  old  dunes  with 
beach  sand  and  lagoonal  deposits.  He  stated  that  the  distinction  between  the  flat-lying 
sandy  Miocene  beds  overlain  by  older  Pleistocene  sand  deposits  “is  difficult  princi- 
pally in  the  large  area  centered  at  7 km  south-southeast  of  Wilson  Cove.”  This  large 
area  is  the  general  location  of  the  gently  dipping  Pliocene  bioclastic  sediments 
(RS-1,  RS-2),  which  may  be  the  “flat-lying  sandy  Miocene  beds”  mentioned  by 
Olmsted. 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  299 


Pleistocene  Marine  Sediments 

The  Pleistocene  consists  of  gray  to  buff  color,  fossiliferous  sand  with  a basal 
conglomerate,  that  differs  in  its  relationship  with  underlying  beds  from  locality  to 
locality.  At  RS-1  (loc.  6320)  and  RS-2  (loc.  6327),  Pleistocene  sand  unconformably 
overlies  Pliocene  sediments;  about  800  m west  of  Wilson  Cove  and  at  NOTS  Pier, 
Pleistocene  sand  is  unconformable  on  Miocene  shale  (loc.  6326);  several  hundred  m 
south  of  Wilson  Cove  (loc.  6324),  it  rests  unconformably  upon  volcanic  rocks;  east 
of  Northwest  Harbor  near  the  northeast  side  of  the  new  airfield,  the  underlying  unit 
is  a volcanic  conglomerate  of  unknown  age  (loc.  6323).  The  mollusks,  representing 
a littoral  and  a sublittoral  environment,  are  found  in  loosely  consolidated  sand  except 
at  localities  6320,  6324,  and  6327,  where  they  occur  between  and  attached  to  clasts 
in  the  basal  conglomerate.  Codakia  ( Epilucina ) calif ornica  (Conrad)  was  the  most 
commonly  collected  species  from  each  locality. 

The  following  is  a list  of  Pleistocene  fossils  collected  from  six  localities.  This 
assemblage  can  be  correlated  with  the  late  Pleistocene  Palos  Verdes  Sand  fauna  of 
the  Los  Angeles  Basin. 

UCLA  locality  6320 

Codakia  ( Epilucina ) californica  (Conrad) 

Transenella  tantilla  (Gould) 

Acmaea  { Acmaea ) mitra  Eschscholtz 
Acmaea  ( Collisella ) scabra  Gould 
Hipponix  tumens  Carpenter 

UCLA  locality  6323 

Codakia  {Epilucina)  californica  (Conrad) 

Gians  subquadrata  (Carpenter) 

Acmaea  {Collisella)  digitalis  Eschscholtz 
Acmaea  (C.)  pelta  nacelloides  Dali 
Acmaea  (C.)  scabra  Gould 
Acmaea  (C.)  scutum  Eschscholtz 
Fissurella  volcano  Reeve 
Tegula  funebralis  (A.  Adams) 

Littorina  planaxis  Philippi 
Hipponix  antiquatus  (Linnaeus) 

Hipponix  tumens  Carpenter 
Serpulorbis  squamigerus  (Carpenter) 

Bittium  sp. 

Amphissa  versiocolor  Dali 
Fusinus  barbarensis  (Trask) 

Olivella  biplicata  (Sowerby) 

Trimusculus  reticulata  (Sowerby) 

Ischnochiton  sp. 

UCLA  locality  6324 

Codakis  {Epilucina)  californica  (Conrad) 

Fissurella  volcano  Reeve 


1978 


A Neogene  Section,  San  Clemente  Island 


9 


Tegula  ligulata  Menke 
Hipponix  antiquatus  (Linnaeus) 

Hipponix  tumens  Carpenter 

Thais  (Stramonita ) biserialis  (Blainville) 

Mitra  idae  Melvill 

Hyalina  californica  (Tomlin) 

Conus  californicus  Hinds 
UCLA  locality  6325 

Codakia  (Epilucina)  californica  (Conrad) 
Acmaea  ( Collisella ) limulata  Carpenter 
Acmaea  ( C .)  scabra  Gould 
Acmaea  (C.)  scutum  Eschscholtz 
Haliotis  cracherodii  Leach 
Megathura  crenulata  (Sowerby) 
Fissurella  volcano  Reeve 
Tegula  funebralis  (A.  Adams) 

Norrisia  norrisi  (Sowerby) 

Littorina  planaxis  Philippi 
Hipponix  antiquatus  Linnaeus 
Hipponix  tumens  Carpenter 
Serpulorbis  squamigerus  (Carpenter) 
Bursa  californica  Hinds 
Amphissa  versicolor  Dali 
Mitra  idae  Melville 
Hyalina  californica  (Tomlin) 

Conus  californicus  Hinds 
UCLA  locality  6326 

Codakia  ( Epilucina ) californica  (Conrad) 
Eissurella  volcano  Reeve 
Astraea  ( Pomaulax ) undosa  (Wood) 
Tegula  funebralis  (A.  Adams) 

Hipponix  tumens  Carpenter 

Neverita  recluziana  (Deshayes) 

Serpulorbis  squamigerus  (Carpenter) 

Bursa  californica  Hinds 

Thais  ( Stramonita ) biserialis  (Blainville) 

Mitra  idae  Melvill 

Olivella  biplicata  (Sowerby) 

Conus  californicus  Hinds 
UCLA  locality  6327 

Codakia  ( Epilucina ) californica  (Conrad) 
Transenella  tantilla  (Gould) 

Acmaea  ( Acmaea ) mitra  Eschscholtz 
Acmaea  (i Collisella ) limatula  Carpenter 
Acmaea  (C.)  scabra  Gould 


10 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  299 


Acmaea  (C.)  scutum  Eschscholtz 
Fissurella  volcano  Reeve 
Tegula  funebralis  (A.  Adams) 

Hipponix  antiquatus  (Linnaeus) 

Mitrella  carinata  gausapata  (Gould) 

Thais  ( Stramonita ) biserialis  (Blainville) 

Olivella  biplicata  (Sowerby) 

Conus  californicus  Hinds 
Ischnochiton  acrior  Carpenter 

Pleistocene  Non-Marine  Sediments — Recent  Dune  Sand 

Loose,  wind-blown  sand  accumulations  cover  much  of  the  northern  half  of  the 
island  and  in  many  places  contain  calcareous  and  siliceous  root  sheaths  or  rhizocon- 
cretions  (Fig.  5).  Johnson  (1967)  suggested  that  all  the  Channel  Islands  had  supported 
more  vegetation  during  the  early  Holocene  than  at  the  present.  The  authors  found 
evidence  of  calcareous  root  sheaths  forming  around  living  sand-dune  plants.  Opaline 
silica  seams  were  common  within  the  sand  deposits  west  of  NOTS  Pier  and  near  the 
old  airfield  (Fig.  3).  Numerous  Indian  midden  remains  and  artifacts  were  observed 
in  the  dune  sand. 

Olmsted  (1958)  stated  that  the  maximum  thickness  of  the  active  and  recently 
active  sand  dunes  is  approximately  19  meters,  and  that  the  older  sand  deposits  are  as 
much  as  40  meters  thick  west  of  Wilson  Cove  (loc.  6326). 

PALEONTOLOGY 

Description  of  New  Subspecies 
Class  BIVALVIA  Linne 
Order  PTERIOIDA  Newell 
Family  PECTINIDAE  Rafinesque 

Type  (by  subsequent  designation,  Schmidt  1818):  Ostrea  maxima  Linne  1758. 

Subgenus  Patinopecten  Dali  1 898 
Type  (original  designation):  Pecten  caurinus  Gould  1850. 

Pecten  ( Patinopecten ) healeyi  Arnold  sanclementensis  new  subspecies 

Genus  Pecten  Muller  177 6 

Diagnosis. — Distinguishable  by  the  much  finer  and  greater  number  of  closely 
and  equally  spaced  ribs  on  the  left  valve;  ribs  narrow,  flat,  interspaces  shallow  and 
narrow  on  right  valve;  right  valve  gently  but  evenly  convex;  left  valve  slightly  convex 
with  anterior  and  posterior  margins  flat  to  somewhat  concave;  poorly  developed  rib- 
bing on  umbonal  area  of  both  valves. 

Description. — Shell  inequivalve,  wider  than  high,  right  valve  slightly  more  con- 
vex than  left  valve;  Right  valve — slightly  but  evenly  convex;  margins  adjacent  to  ears 
ornamented  by  numerous  fine  radial  ribs  prior  to  beginning  of  primary  ribs;  approx- 
imately thirty,  low  rectangular,  irregular  radial  ribs  separated  by  narrower,  primary 


1978 


A Neogene  Section,  San  Clemente  Island 


1 


shallow  interspaces;  primary  ribs  become  dichotomus,  separated  by  narrower,  ex- 
tremely shallow  secondary  interspaces  and  about  twenty  percent  become  trichotomus; 
primary  and  secondary  interspaces  become  about  equal  in  width  along  the  outer  mar- 
gin; surface  of  shell  ornamented  by  numerous,  closely  spaced  fine  concentric  growth 
lines  becoming  more  prominent  along  the  margin;  hinge  line  about  one-half  the  shell 
length;  anterior  ear  slightly  longer  than  the  posterior  ear;  anterior  ear  separated  from 
body  of  shell  by  a narrow,  shallow  sulcus,  a wide  fold  immediately  dorsal  to  the 
sulcus,  fine  radiating  lines  most  prominent  adjacent  to  the  dorsal  margin  of  fold, 
growth  lines  sinuous;  posterior  ear  with  narrow  sulcus,  numerous  fine  radiating  lines 
with  oblique  growth  lines.  Left  valve — slightly  convex  with  anterior  and  posterior 
margins  flat  to  slightly  concave;  approximately  thirty  to  thirty-two  ribs,  low,  narrow 
and  sharp,  closely  but  equally  spaced;  fine  secondary  riblets  occur  between  primary 
ribs;  shell  surface  ornamented  by  minute  concentric  growth  lines  which  become  bun- 
dled and  prominent  along  the  margin  of  shell;  anterior  ear  ornamented  with  fine, 
slightly  sinuous  growth  lines  crossed  by  radiating  lines,  a broad  shallow  sulcus  extends 
from  the  beak  through  the  middle  part  of  the  ear;  posterior  ear  characterized  by  coarse 
radiating  lines  crossed  by  fine  oblique  growth  lines. 

Syntypes. — UCLA  Invert.  Paleo.  Coll.  cat.  nos.  38790  (right  valve),  38791  (left  valve). 
Locality  of  Syntypes . — UCLA  Invert.  Paleo.  Coll.  loc.  no.  6316. 

Dimensions  of  Syntypes. — Right  valve  - height  - 170  mm 

- length  - 190  mm 
Left  valve  - height  - 137  mm 

- length  - 150  mm 

Paratypes. — UCLA  Invert.  Paleo.  Coll.  cat.  nos.  38792  (right  valve),  38793  (left  valve). 
Locality  of  Paratypes. — UCLA  Invert.  Paleo.  Coll.  loc.  no.  6316. 

Dimension  of  Paratypes. — Right  valve  - height  - 148  mm 

- length  - 172  mm 
Left  valve  - height  - 150  mm 

- length  - 155  mm 


Remarks. — Numerous  specimens  of  P.  ( P .)  healeyi  from  localities  throughout 
southern  California  were  carefully  examined.  Considerable  variation  was  observed 
within  a given  locality,  although  none  are  closely  similar  to  the  San  Clemente  Island 
forms  in  which  the  left  valve  shows  a greater  range  of  variation  than  does  the  right 
valve.  The  variable  features  of  the  left  valve  were  also  discussed  by  Vedder  and  Moore 
(1976)  and  they  considered  that  the  smooth  umbonal  form  may  possibly  represent  a 
new  species.  It  is  quite  reasonable  to  suspect  that  the  specimens  from  San  Clemente 
Island  may  represent  an  extreme  case  of  maximum  variation  within  the  species.  How- 
ever, the  specimens  from  San  Clemente  Island  differ  from  other  described  species  and 
display  very  little  variation  within  the  localities,  therefore  a new  subspecies  is  estab- 
lished. This  subspecies  is  named  for  San  Clemente  Island. 

PECTEN  (AMUSSIOPECTEN)  LOMPOCENSIS  Arnold  is  common  in  the  basal 
part  of  the  orange  sandstone  exposed  at  section  RS-3,  loc.  6317.  Many  of  the  speci- 


12 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  299 


mens  are  found  articulated,  but  complete  specimens  are  difficult  to  collect.  Each  shell 
is  fractured  and  it  is  necessary  to  coat  the  surface  with  an  adhesive,  prior  to  removing 
it  from  the  coarse  sandstone  matrix. 

P.  (A.)  lompocensis  is  often  confused  with  Pecten  ( Amussiopecten ) vanvlecki 
Arnold,  (Arnold  1907)  and  the  two  species  are  not  readily  separable  unless  the  external 
and  internal  surfaces  are  well  preserved.  However,  there  are  several  helpful  distin- 
guishing features,  which  include  the  development  of  the  external  radial  ribs  and  the 
spacing  of  the  internal  ribs.  On  the  right  valve  of  P.  (A.)  lompocensis,  the  external 
radial  ribs  are  poorly  defined  and  the  ribs  are  paired  internally.  On  the  left  valve,  the 
external  ribs  are  better  developed  and  the  internal  ribs  are  not  paired  but  equally  spaced 
with  the  interspaces.  In  P.  (A.)  vanvlecki,  the  external  ribs  on  both  valves  are  better 
developed  but  internally,  the  paired  ribs  occur  on  the  left  valve  and  they  are  equally 
spaced  in  the  right  valve. 

Masuda  (1971),  in  his  study  of  Amussiopecten,  stated  that  P.  (A.)  vanvlecki  is 
easily  distinguishable  from  the  frequently  confused  species  P.  (A.)  lompocensis  by 
"its  rather  thick  shell,  squarish,  low,  flatly  round-topped  radial  ribs  tending  to  become 
obsolete  towards  the  ventral  and  lateral  margins,  paired  internal  ribs  developed  at 
lower  part  and  larger  and  angulate  auricles.”  Masuda  (1971)  did  not  make  any  dis- 
tinction as  to  which  valve  is  characterized  by  the  paired  internal  ribs. 

The  occurrence  of  fragmentary  specimens  of  Amussiopecten  cf.  A.  vanvlecki  is 
reported  by  Vedder  and  Moore  (1976)  from  China  Canyon  in  the  southern  end  of  San 
Clemente  Island  in  association  with  Lyropecten  crassicardo  (Conrad)  and  Crassostrea 
cf.  C . freudenbergi  (Hertlein  and  Jordan),  USGS  loc.  M6505.  According  to  Vedder 
and  Moore  (1976),  these  fossils  are  imbedded  in  a fine-to  coarse-grained  calcarenite 
which  differs  considerably  in  lithology  from  the  orange  sandstone  in  which  P.  (A.) 
lompocensis  occurs  so  commonly  (UCLA  loc.  6317,  which  apparently  has  not  been 
visited  by  previous  investigators). 


CONCLUSIONS 

Unusually  well-preserved  marine  mollusca  are  found  in  Neogene  sedimentary 
units  on  San  Clemente  Island.  Miocene  sands  contain  pecten  beds  and  oyster  lenses 
which  suggest  a shallow,  near-shore  environment.  Diatomaceous  shales,  overlying 
these  sands,  have  been  correlated  with  the  coastal  Monterey  Formation  and  are  evi- 
dence of  deep  submergence  during  the  middle  Miocene.  These  Miocene  deposits 
appear  to  have  accumulated  in  the  same  depositional  basin  as  the  Monterey  Formation 
in  the  southeastern  Los  Angeles  Basin  and  represent  a comparable  environment. 

The  overlying  Pliocene  strata  contain  abundant  brachiopods,  bryozoans,  and  pec- 
tens  with  conglomerate  layers  which  are  indicative  of  shallow  water  and  uplift  of  the 
island  block.  The  small  fauna  includes  diagnostic  Pliocene  species  which  correlate 
with  the  Pecten  (P.)  healeyi  zone  (upper  Pliocene)  throughout  southern  California. 

Abundant  collections  of  Pleistocene  littoral  and  sublittoral  mollusks  in  sand  de- 
posits and  among  volcanic  boulders  continue  to  denote  elevation  of  the  island.  The 
formation  of  marine  terraces  and  the  deposition  of  dune  sand  with  rhizoconcretions 
mark  the  emergence  of  the  island  during  the  Holocene. 


1978 


A Neogene  Section,  San  Clemente  Island 


13 


Figure  3.  Map  of  northern  and  part  of  central  San  Clemente  Island  showing  fossil  localities 
and  RS-sections. 


14 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  299 


1 1 -5 


Figure  4.  A comparison  of  generalized  stratigraphic  columns,  Randall  Blockhouse  Area. 


Figures  5-8.  (5.)  Rhizoconcretions  in  post-Pleistocene  sands.  (6.)  Miocene  section  at  RS-3,  the 
darker  unit  just  above  the  collectors  is  the  orange  sandstone.  (7.)  Pecten  ( Amussiopecten ) 
lompocensis  occurring  in  the  orange  sandstone,  UCLA  loc.  6317.  Icepick  points  to  a bone. 
(8.)  Brachiopod  bed  exposed  in  roadcut  at  RS-1. 


16 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  299 


II 


Figures  9-1 1 . (9.)  Soil-covered  Pliocene  sediments  exposed  in  roadcut  just  above  Randall  Block- 
house, section  RS-1.  (10.)  Characteristic  conglomerate  layer  (middle  of  photograph)  in  Pliocene 
strata.  (11.)  Rounded,  wave-cut  cavities  in  Pliocene  strata  at  RS-2. 


1978 


A Neogene  Section,  San  Clemente  Island 


17 


Figures  12-17.  (12.)  Pecten  ( Amussiopecten ) lompocensis  Arnold,  left  valve,  external  view, 
height  - 64  mm.  length  - 64  mm.  UCLA  cat  no.  38788.  UCLA  loc.  6317.  (approx.  X 7/10). 
(13.)  Pecten  ( Amussiopecten ) lompocensis  Arnold,  left  valve,  internal  view,  height  - 70  mm. 
length  - 70  mm.  UCLA  cat  no.  38896.  UCLA  loc.  6317.  (approx.  X 3/5).  (14 .)  Pecten  (Amus- 
siopecten) lompocensis  Arnold,  right  valve,  internal  view,  height  - 44  mm.  length  - 41  mm.  UCLA 
cat  no.  38895.  UCLA  loc.  6317.  (approx,  x 4/5).  (15).  Pecten  (Amussiopecten)  lompocensis 
Arnold,  right  valve,  external  view,  height  - 95  mm.  length  - 100  mm.  UCLA  cat  no.  38789,  UCLA 
loc.  6317.  (approx.  X 1/2).  (16 .)  Pecten  (Amussiopecten)  lompocensis  Arnold,  right  valve,  ex- 
ternal view,  height  - 64  mm.  length  - 64  mm.  UCLA  cat  no.  38788.  UCLA  loc.  6317.  (approx. 
X 7/10).  (17 .)  Pecten  (Amussiopecten)  lompocensis  Arnold,  right  valve,  internal  view,  height  - 
44  mm.  length  - 47  mm.  UCLA  cat  no.  38897.  UCLA  loc.  6317.  (approx,  x 4/5). 


18 


No.  299 


Contributions  in  Science 


Figures  18-19.  (18.)  Pecten  {Patinopecten)  healeyi  sanclementensis  n.  subsp.  Syntype.  right 
valve,  height  - 170  mm.  length  - 190  mm.  UCLA  cat  no.  38790.  UCLAloc.  6316.  (approx.  X 2/5). 
(19 .)  Pecten  {Patinopecten)  healeyi  sanclementensis  n.  subsp.  Syntype.  left  valve,  height  - 137 
mm.  length  - 150  mm.  UCLA  cat  no.  38791.  UCLA  loc.  6316.  (approx,  x Vz). 


1978 


A Neogene  Section,  San  Clemente  Island 


19 


21 

Figures  20-21.  (20 .)  Pecten  (Patinopecten)  healeyi  Arnold.  Hypotype.  right  valve.  Figured  by 
Hertlein  & Grant.  1972  (text-fig.  9A,  p.  184).  height  - 122  mm.  length  - 130  mm.  UCLA  cat  no. 
1950.  Pacific  Beach,  San  Diego,  California  (approx.  X V2)  compare  with  fig.  18.  (21.)  Pecten 
( Patinopecten ) healeyi  Arnold.  Hypotype.  left  valve.  Figured  by  Hertlein  & Grant.  1972  (text- 
fig.  9B,  p.  184).  height  - 122  mm.  length  - 130  mm.  UCLA  cat  no.  1950.  Pacific  Beach,  San 
Diego,  California,  (approx.  X V2)  compare  with  fig.  19. 


20 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  299 


Figures  22-26.  (22.)  Opalia  ( Opalia ) wroblewskyi  (Morch).  ab-aperture  view,  height  - 81  mm. 
width -22  mm.  UCLA  cat  no.  38798.  UCLAloc.  6322.  (approx.  X 9/10).  (23.)  Same  specimen  as 
fig.  22.  aperture  view,  (approx,  x 9/10).  (24 .)Pecten  (Pecten)  cf.  P.  (P.)  lecontei  Arnold,  right 
valve,  height  - 60  mm.  length  - 67  mm.  UCLA  cat  no.  38787.  UCLA  loc.  6316.  (approx,  x 9/10). 
(25 .)  Pecten  ( Pecten ) bellus  (Conrad),  right  valve,  height  - 39  mm.  length  - 43  mm.  UCLA  cat 
no.  38786.  UCLA  loc.  6316.  (approx,  x 9/10).  (26 .)  Chlamys  (Chlamys)  opuntia  (Dali),  right 
valve,  height -66 mm.  length -66 mm.  UCLAcatno.  38797.  UCLAloc.  6316.  (approx,  x 9/10). 


1978 


A Neogene  Section,  San  Clemente  Island 


21 


Figures  27-29.  (27.)  Large  desmostylid  tooth,  occlusal  view.  UCLA  cat  no.  57531.  UCLA  loc. 
6363.  (approx.  X 2)  length  - 33  mm.  width  - 22  mm.  (28.)  Same  specimen  as  fig.  27.  end  view, 
(approx.  X 2)  height  - 44  mm.  (29.)  Same  specimen  as  fig.  27.  labial  view,  (approx.  X 2). 


22 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  299 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The  authors  are  indebted  to  Herb  Beltran,  Foreman  Rigger,  Naval  Undersea 
Center  (NUC),  San  Clemente  Island,  who  arranged  for  the  initial  visit  to  the  island 
and  provided  invaluable  aid  in  camp  and  in  the  field.  Jack  Harris,  Range  Engineer 
NUC,  arranged  for  subsequent  visits  to  the  island.  Those,  who  were  responsible  for 
permitting  research  to  be  conducted  on  the  island  are  Lt.  Commander  W.  G.  Kay, 
Officer-in-charge,  San  Clemente  Island,  NUC;  Commander  Timothy  C.  Kelley,  CEC 
USN,  Public  Works  Officer,  NUC;  and  Jan  K.  Larsen,  Wildlife  Biologist,  Natural 
Resources  Program,  NUC. 

The  following  people  contributed  significantly  in  the  field:  Carl  Westendarp, 
NUC;  Marvin  Rohrs  and  Lorna  Ross,  Natural  History  Foundation  of  Orange  County; 
Mark  Beck,  Bill  and  John  Beltran,  Danny  Cook,  Richard  Ebel,  Alan  Leach,  John 
Lemo,  Lorry  Partridge,  Cindy  Phelps,  and  Roger  Zachery,  Huntington  Beach  High 
School.  Lawrence  G.  Bames,  Earth  Science  Division,  Los  Angeles  County  Museum 
of  Natural  History  examined  the  desmostylid  tooth.  The  manuscript  was  kindly  read 
and  criticized  by  Willis  P.  Popenoe  and  Paul  M.  Merifield,  Department  of  Geology, 
University  of  California,  Los  Angeles.  Recognition  is  given  to  Edward  C.  Wilson, 
Earth  Science  Division,  Los  Angeles  County  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Warren  O. 
Addicott,  Department  of  Paleontology  and  Stratigraphy,  United  States  Geological 
Survey,  Menlo  Park,  California,  and  Jere  H.  Lipps,  Department  of  Geology,  Uni- 
versity of  California,  Davis,  California  for  their  critical  review. 

All  illustrations  and  photographs  were  prepared  by  the  authors. 

FOSSIL  LOCALITY  REGISTER 

The  following  locality  numbers  are  those  of  the  paleontology  collection,  De- 
partment of  Geology,  University  of  California,  Los  Angeles.  They  all  were  plotted 
on  the  U.S.  Geological  Survey  topographic  quadrangle  of  San  Clemente  Island  North 
(7.5  min.,  1950),  unless  otherwise  indicated. 

6316  - Sediments  containing  Pecten  ( P .)  bellus  and  Pecten  (P.)  healeyi  sanclementensis  n. 
subsp.  exposed  in  both  sides  of  a roadcut,  just  before  last  turn  to  the  end  of  road  to  Randall 
Blockhouse  (RS-1),  approx.  792  m S 42°  E of  NOTS  Pier.  (Upper  Pliocene). 

6317  - Loosely  consolidated  orange  sandstone  bed  containing  Pecten  (A.)  lompocensis  exposed 
in  a narrow,  steep  canyon  approx.  1524  m S 35°  E of  NOTS  Pier  and  about  1097  m N 58° 
E of  BM-820  (RS-3).  (Middle  Miocene) 

6318  - Well-indurated  chalky-colored  sediments  cropping  out  on  the  south  side  of  a narrow 
ravine  containing  Pecten  ( P .)  bellus,  about  213  m west  of  Randall  Blockhouse  (RS-1), 
(Upper  Pliocene) 

6320  - Pleistocene  fossils  attached  to  boulders  and  in  the  sand  between  the  conglomerate  on  the 
southside  of  a narrow  ridge  about  427  m S 13°  W of  Randall  Blockhouse  (RS-1)  and  approx. 
700  m S 18°  W of  NOTS  Pier.  (Upper  Pleistocene) 

6321  - Steep,  small  gully  south  of  Randall  Blockhouse  (RS-2),  Pliocene  section  exposed  un- 
conformably  overlying  Miocene  shale  and  underlying  Pleistocene  conglomerate,  about  213 
m south  of  Randall  Blockhouse.  (Upper  Pliocene) 

6322  - Fossils  collected  from  disturbed  (by  grading)  beds  overlying  the  brownish-orange  sand- 
stone on  the  northwest  wall  of  Canyon  (Lemon  Tank)  just  below  the  top,  365  m east  of 


1978 


A Neogene  Section,  San  Clemente  Island 


23 


Hill  1185,  U.S.  Geological  Survey  topographic  guadrangle  of  San  Clemente  Island  Central 
(7.5  min.,  1950).  (Upper  Pliocene  with  some  Upper  Pleistocene) 

6323  - Fossils  collected  from  north  of  northeast  end  of  new  airfield,  halfway  down  the  slope 
between  upper  road  to  the  first  wide,  flat  terrace,  1280  m S 3°  E of  stream  entering  North- 
west Harbor.  (Upper  Pleistocene) 

6324  - Pleistocene  along  the  top  edge  of  sea  wall  in  conglomerate,  overlying  volcanic  rocks, 
about  455  m S 65°  E from  the  end  of  Wilson  Cove  Pier.  (Upper  Pleistocene) 

6325  - Pleistocene  fossils  in  conglomerate  and  loose  sand  overlying  Miocene  shale,  directly 
behind  building  by  NOTS  Pier.  (Upper  Pleistocene) 

6326  - Fossiliferous  Pleistocene  bed  in  a shallow  cut,  lying  unconformably  on  Miocene  shale, 
365  m S 68°  E of  Harbor  triangulation  station  648.  (Upper  Pleistocene) 

6327  - Pleistocene  fossils  in  conglomerate  unconformably  overlying  Pliocene  sediments  in  a 
gully  183  m due  south  of  Randall  Blockhouse  (RS-2).  (Upper  Pleistocene) 

6363  - A large  desmostylid  tooth  collected  from  a gray  sandstone  approximately  one  hundred 
m south  of  UCLA  loc.  6317,  stratigraphically  about  a meter  above  beds  containing  Pecten 
( Amussiopecten ) lompocensis . 


LITERATURE  CITED 


Arnold,  Ralph.  1906.  Tertiary  and  Quaternary  pectens  of  California.  U.S.  Geol.  Surv.  Prof. 
Paper  47:  92-93;  pi.  28,  figs.  1,  2,  3. 

1907,  Fossil  mollusks  from  California.  Smithsonian  Misc.  Coll.  50:  428-429;  pi. 

Lin,  fig.  i,  2. 

Bramlette,  M.  N.  1946.  Monterey  Formation  of  California  and  the  origin  of  its  siliceous  rocks. 
U.S.  Geol.  Surv.  Prof.  Paper  212:  55  p. 

Cooper,  J.  G.  1865.  Geology  of  California,  Sect.  V.  Islands  off  the  coast  of  southern  California. 
Geol.  Surv.  of  California.  1:  182-186. 

Hertlein,  L.  G.  and  U.  S.  Grant.  1944.  The  geology  and  paleontology  of  the  marine  Pliocene 
of  San  Diego,  California.  Part  I.  Geology,  San  Diego  Soc.  Natur.  Hist.  Mem.  II:  72  p. 

1960.  The  geology  and  paleontology  of  the  marine  Pliocene  of  San  Diego,  California. 

Part  2a.  Paleontology.  San  Diego  Soc.  Natur.  Hist.  Mem.  II:  73-133;  pis.  19-26. 

1972.  The  geology  and  paleontology  of  the  marine  Pliocene  of  San  Diego,  California. 

(Paleontology:  Pelecypoda).  San  Diego  Soc.  Natur.  Hist.  Mem.  II.  Part  2b:  143-409;  pis. 
27-57. 

Johnson,  D.  L.  1967.  Caliche  on  the  Channel  Islands.  California  Div.  Mines  & Geol.  20  (2): 
151-158. 

Lawson,  A.  C.  1893.  The  post-Pliocene  diastrophism  of  the  coast  of  southern  California.  Bull. 
Dep.  Geol.  Univ.  California  1 (4):  135-139. 

Masuda,  Koichiro.  1971.  Amussiopecten  from  North  America  and  northern  South  America. 

Palaeontological  Soc.  Japan  Trans,  and  Proc.  84:  205-224:  pis.  25,  26. 

Merifield,  P.  M.,  D.  L.  Lamar  and  M.  L.  Stout.  1971.  Geology  of  central  San  Clemente 
Island,  California.  Geol.  Soc.  Amer.  Bull.  82  (7):  1989-1994. 

Mitchell,  Edward  D.,  Jr.  and  Jere  H.  Lipps.  1965.  Fossil  collection  San  Clemente  Island. 
Pacific  Discovery.  18  (3):  2-8. 

Morton,  Paul  K.,  William  J.  Edgington  and  Donald  L.  Fife.  1974.  Geology  and  en- 
gineering geologic  aspects  of  the  San  Juan  Capistrano  Quadrangle,  Orange  County,  Cali- 
fornia. California  Div.  Mines  & Geol.  Spec.  Rep.  112:  12,  48-49. 

Olmsted,  F.  H.  1958.  Geologic  reconnaissance  of  San  Clemente  Island,  U.S.  Geol.  Surv.  Bull. 
1071-B:  55-68. 


24 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  299 


Ridlon,  J.  B.  1968.  San  Clemente  Island  Rocksite  Project.  Offshore  Geology.  Part  1.  Detailed 
survey  off  Eel  and  Lost  Points  area.  Dep.  of  the  Navy,  Naval  Weapons  Center,  China  Lake, 
California:  79  p. 

1969.  San  Clemente  Island  Rocksite  Project.  Offshore  Geology.  Part  II.  Reconnais- 
sance survey  around  the  island.  Dep.  of  the  Navy  Weapons  Center,  China  Lake,  California: 
132  p. 

1972.  Pleistocene-Holocene  deformation  of  the  San  Clemente  Island  crustal  block, 

California.  Geol.  Soc.  Amer.  Bull.  83  (6):  1831-1844. 

Smith,  W.  S.  T.  1898.  A geological  sketch  of  the  San  Clemente  Island,  U.S.  Geol.  Surv.  18th 
Ann.  Rep.  Part  2:  459-496. 

Stadum,  Carol  J.  1975.  “Paleontological  Sites”  Construction  of  regional  wastewater  facilities, 
Environmental  Impact  Report  for  Aliso  Water  Management  Agency.  Culp/Wesner/Culp, 
Clean  Water  Consultants:  III- 13- 19. 

Stadum,  Carol  J.  and  Takeo  Susuki.  1976.  The  discovery  of  marine  Pliocene  strata  on  San 
Clemente  Island,  California.  Geol.  Soc.  Amer.  Abstracts  with  programs.  8 (3):  411;  Feb. 
1976. 

Vedder,  J.  G.,  L.  A.  Beyer,  A.  Junger,  G.  W.  Moore,  A.  E.  Roberts,  J.  C.  Taylor  and 
H.  C.  Wagner.  1975.  Preliminary  report  on  the  geology  of  the  continental  borderlands  of 
southern  California,  U.S.  Geol.  Surv.  Map  MF-624:  9 maps. 

Vedder,  J.  G.  and  Ellen  J.  Moore.  1976.  Paleoenvironmental  implications  of  fossiliferous 
Miocene  and  Pliocene  strata  on  San  Clemente  Island,  California:  p.  107-135.  In  D.  G. 
Howell  ed.  Aspects  of  the  geologic  history  of  the  California  continental  borderland.  Pacific 
Section  A.A.P.G.  Misc.  Pub.  24. 

Weaver,  D.  W.  and  G.  L.  Myer.  1969.  Stratigraphy  of  northeastern  Santa  Cruz  Island, 
p.  158-172.  In  D.  W.  Weaver  and  others.  Geology  of  the  northern  Channel  Islands,  south- 
ern California  borderland.  (Los  Angeles,  California)  A.A.P.G.  & S.E.P.M.  Pacific  Section. 

Accepted  for  publication  March  30,  1977. 


f, 


NUMBER  300 
JUNE  16,  1978 


A SYSTEMATIC  REVIEW  OF  THE  MEXICAN  FROG 
RANA  SIERRAMADRENSIS  TAYLOR 


By  Robert  G.  Webb 


NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCENCC 


Published  by  the  NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM 
OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 
900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007 


SERIAL  PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE 
NATURAL  HISTORY  MUSEUM  OF  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY 


Prior  to  November  30,  1973,  publications  of  the  Natural  History  Museum  have  appeared 
under  various  formats — Leaflet  Series,  Museum  Graphic,  Science  Series,  Study  Guides,  Con- 
tributions in  Science,  Contributions  in  History,  Science  Bulletins,  unnumbered  catalogs  of 
exhibitions,  and  other  miscellaneous  publications.  The  Museum  now  publishes  the  following 
serials  at  irregular  intervals  as  CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE,  HISTORY  BULLETINS, 
SCIENCE  BULLETINS,  EDUCATION  SERIES,  HISTORY  SERIES,  and  SCIENCE  SE- 
RIES. The  Contributions  are  short  papers  of  octavo  size.  The  Bulletins  are  longer,  compre- 
hensive papers  of  quarto  size.  The  Series  are  papers  of  variable  lengths  of  quarto  or  larger 
size.  Papers  in  each  serial  are  numbered  separately  and  consecutively. 

CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  contain  articles  in  the  earth  and  life  sciences,  presenting 
results  of  original  research.  Emphasis  is  intended  principally  for  papers  allied  to  biosystematic 
research,  but  other  subjects  and  review-oriented  ones  will  be  considered.  Number  1 was  issued 
on  January  23,  1957.  Contributions  must  be  not  less  than  8 nor  exceed  72  printed  pages. 


INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  AUTHORS 

Acceptance  of  manuscripts  will  be  determined  by  the  significance  of  new  information.  Priority 
will  be  given  to  manuscripts  by  staff  members.  All  manuscripts  must  be  recommended  by  the 
curator  in  charge  of  each  discipline  or  by  the  Editorial  Board.  Manuscripts  must  conform  to 
the  specifications  listed  below.  They  will  be  examined  for  suitability  by  the  Editorial  Board 
and  will  include  review  by  specialists  outside  the  Museum. 

Authors  must  adhere  to  the  International  Code  of  Nomenclature  of  Bacteria  and  Viruses, 
International  Code  of  Botanical  Nomenclature,  and  International  Code  of  Zoological  Nomen- 
clature, including  their  respective  recommendations.  Further,  authors  proposing  new  taxa  in 
a CONTRIBUTIONS  IN  SCIENCE  must  indicate  that  all  primary  types  have  been  deposited 
in  an  appropriate  scientific  institution  of  their  choice  and  must  cite  that  institution  by  name. 

MANUSCRIPT  FORM. — (1)  In  preparation  of  copy  follow  the  1972  CBE  Style  Manual, 
third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapters  5 and  6.  (2)  Footnotes  should  be  avoided;  acknowledgments 
as  footnotes  will  not  be  accepted.  (3)  An  informative  abstract  must  be  included  for  all  papers. 
(4)  A Spanish  summary  is  required  for  all  manuscripts  dealing  with  Latin  American  subjects. 
Summaries  in  other  languages  are  not  required  but  are  strongly  recommended.  (5)  A differ- 
ential diagnosis  must  accompany  any  newly  proposed  taxon.  (6)  Submit  two  copies  of  manu- 
script. 

ILLUSTRATIONS. — All  illustrations,  including  maps  and  photographs,  will  be  referred  to 
as  figures.  All  illustrations  should  be  of  sufficient  clarity  and  in  proper  proportions  for  reduc- 
tion to  CONTRIBUTIONS  page  size.  In  preparing  illustrations  and  legends  consult  the  1972 
CBE  Style  Manual,  third  edition  (AIBS),  Chapter  5.  Submit  only  illustrations  made  with 
permanent  ink  and  glossy  photographic  prints  of  good  contrast.  Submit  duplicate  copies  of 
all  illustrations.  Original  illustrations  will  be  returned  after  the  manuscript  has  been  published. 

PROOF. — Authors  will  be  sent  galley  proofs  which  should  be  corrected  and  returned  promptly. 
No  changes  or  alterations,  other  than  typesetting  corrections,  will  be  allowed  unless  paid  by 
author.  Requests  for  reprints  may  be  placed  through  the  Editor. 

R.  Edward  Ostermeyer 
Editor 


All  communications  concerning  manuscripts  and  exchange  of  or  purchase  of  publications 
should  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Museum  Publications,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County,  900  Exposition  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  California  90007. 

Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America  by  Chapman’s  Phototypesetting  on  70#  Patina  Book 


A SYSTEMATIC  REVIEW  OF  THE  MEXICAN  FROG 
RAN  A SI  ERR  A MA  DRENSIS  TAYLOR1 


By  Robert  G.  Webb2 

Abstract:  The  variation  of  Rana  sierramadrensis  Taylor  is  discussed.  A pre- 
viously unreported  secondary  sexual  characteristic  is  the  presence  of  white  spinous 
excrescences  on  the  non-enlarged  thumbs,  chest  and  lower  jaw  of  males.  The  tadpoles 
are  described.  Rana  sierramadrensis  is  compared  with  R.  sinaloae  Zweifel.  The  former 
is  retained  in  the  R.  palmipes  species  group,  while  the  latter  is  transferred  to  the  R. 
tarahumarae  group,  which  is  proposed  for  the  inclusion  of  the  Mexican  species,  R. 
tarahumarae , R.  pustulosa,  R.  sinaloae , R.  pueblae,  and  R.johni.  Rana  sierramadren- 
sis is  confined  to  the  Sierra  Madre  del  Sur  in  the  Mexican  states  of  Guerrero  and  Oaxaca, 
and  seems  to  be  most  closely  related  to  Rana  maculata. 


INTRODUCTION 

Rana  sierramadrensis  is  an  upland  tropical  species  in  southern  Mexico  that  is 
little  known  except  for  a few  published  locality  records.  My  interest  in  R.  sierra- 
madrensis is  a by-product  of  a study  of  frogs  of  the  R.  pustulosa-tarahumarae  com- 
plex and  R.  sinaloae  in  western  Mexico.  Zweifel  included  both  R.  sierramadrensis 
and  R.  sinaloae  in  the  R.  palmipes  species  group  (1954),  and  the  two  species  R. 
pustulosa  and/?,  tarahumarae  in  the/?,  boylei  group  (1955).  In  view  of  speculation 
that  /?.  sinaloae  is  related  to  the  /?.  pustulosa-tarahumarae  complex,  most  available 
specimens  of/?,  sierramadrensis  were  examined  in  order  to  determine  its  relationship 
to  /?.  sinaloae . 

The  “ Rana  tarahumarae  group”  is  proposed  for  the  first  time  to  accommodate 
the  Mexican  species/?,  tarahumarae,  R.  pustulosa,  R.  sinaloae,  R.  pueblae  and/?. 
johni.  Biochemical  data  (Case  1976  and  personal  communication)  suggest  that  /?. 
tarahumarae  (only  Mexican  species  studied  by  Case)  is  not  closely  related  to  the  two 
United  States  members  of  Zweifel’s /?.  boylei  group  (1955),  /?.  boylei  and/?,  muscosa. 
Those  two  species  also  differ  from/?,  tarahumarae  and  the  other  Mexican  species  in 
having  two  metatarsal  tubercles  (instead  of  one),  and  the  larvae  having  four  or  more 
lower  rows  of  teeth  (instead  of  three),  and  in  lacking  marginal  teeth. 

Specimens  examined  are  deposited  in  the  following  collections:  American  Mu- 
seum of  Natural  History  (AMNH);  Field  Museum  of  Natural  History  (FMNH);  Natural 
History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County  (LACM);  University  of  Kansas  Museum  of 


’Review  Committee  for  this  Contribution 
Robert  L.  Bezy 
Roy  W.  McDiarmid 
John  W.  Wright 
Richard  G.  Zweifel 

2Research  Associate  in  Herpetology,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County,  and  De- 
partment of  Biological  Sciences,  The  University  of  Texas  at  El  Paso,  El  Paso,  Texas  79968 


2 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  300 


Natural  History  (KU);  The  Museum,  Michigan  State  University  (MSU);  Texas  Co- 
operative Wildlife  Collection,  Texas  A&M  University  (TCWC);  University  of  Illinois 
Museum  of  Natural  History  (UIMNH);  University  of  Michigan  Museum  of  Zoology 
(UMMZ);  and,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History  (USNM).  I thank  Richard  G. 
Zweifel  for  a kodachrome  slide  and  a black-and-white  photograph  of  Rana  maculata 
here  reproduced  in  figure  5. 

Rana  sierramadrensis  Taylor 

Rana  sierramadrensis  has  always  been  considered  a distinct,  monotypic  species. 
There  are  no  known  synonyms  of  R.  sierramadrensis . In  the  original  description, 
Taylor  (1939:397-398)  listed  six  specimens  (3963A,  3963B,  6565,  6566,  6567,  and 
6568),  designating  3963B  as  the  holotype  and  the  remainder  as  paratypes;  these  num- 
bers refer  to  the  Edward  H.  Taylor-Hobart  M.  Smith  private  collection  (EHT-HMS). 
Later,  Taylor  (1944:140)  reiterated  data  about  the  types.  Of  the  six  specimens  in  the 
type  series,  four  were  subsequently  sent  to  the  FMNH  and  two  were  donated  to  the 
UIMNH.  The  type  material  is  briefly  discussed  below. 

The  holotype  (Fig.  1,  formerly  EHT-HMS  3963B)  from  “near  Agua  del  Obispo, 
between  Rincon  and  Cajones,  Guerrero,  July  1,  1932“  is  now  FMNH  100038.  It  is 
a female  88.2  mm  SVL  and  was  described  in  some  detail  by  Taylor  (1939:398-399). 
The  other  large  frog  (formerly  EHT-HMS  3963 A)  with  the  same  data  of  collection 
as  the  holotype  is  UIMNH  27053  (Smith,  Langebartel,  and  Williams  1964:32);  a pho- 
tograph of  this  paratype,  69.7  mm  SVL,  was  published  in  the  original  description 
(Taylor  1939:  PI.  XXIX,  Fig.  1).  Four  small  paratypes  do  not  exceed  40  mm  SVL. 


Figure  1.  Holotype  of  Rana  sierramadrensis,  FMNH  100038,  from  near  Agua  del  Obispo, 
between  Rincon  and  Cajones,  Guerrero,  Mexico. 


1978 


A Systematic  Review  of  the  Mexican  Frog 


3 


One  of  them  (formerly  EHT-HMS  6565  and  UIMNH  27054),  38.9  mm  SVL  from 
“about  9 km.  southwest  of  Mazatlan,  Guerrero  (km.  337),  July  21,  1936,”  is  now 
USNM  139724  (Cochran,  1961:76).  A small  paratype  (formerly  EHT-HMS  6566), 
33.5  mm  SVL,  from  “near  Agua  del  Obispo  (km.  350-351),  July  24,  1936,”  is  now 
cataloged  as  FMNH  102202.  The  other  two  paratypes  (formerly  EHT-HMS  6567  and 
6568),  37.0  and  28.8  mm  SVL,  both  from  “Agua  del  Obispo,  August  1,  1936,”  are 
now  cataloged,  respectively,  as  FMNH  102201  and  FMNH  103917.  Museum  locality 
data  associated  with  some  paratypes  are  slightly  different  from  the  localities  quoted 
(above)  by  Taylor  (1939). 


Description 

Color  and  pattern. — The  dorsal  ground  color  is  brown  or  bronze-brown.  The 
narrow,  dorsolateral  folds  are  usually  slightly  paler  (usually  buff,  not  white)  than  the 
ground  color,  have  distinct,  but  narrow,  black,  lateral  borders,  and  extend  to  the  sacral 
region.  A prominent  white  supralabial  stripe  extends  from  near  the  tip  of  the  snout 
to  above  the  insertion  of  the  forelimb;  this  white  stripe  is  widest  posteriorly  (above 
forelimb  insertion)  where  it  is  often  interrupted  forming  a posteriormost,  white  spot. 
There  is  a black  canthal  stripe,  black  diagonal  posttympanic  bar,  black  barlike  mark 
on  the  anterior  surface  of  the  humerus  at  the  insertion  of  the  forelimb,  and  often  a 
black  blotch  or  barlike  mark  in  the  groin.  A posttympanic  fold  is  absent;  however, 
the  region  is  often  somewhat  swollen  and  a partial  fold  is  discemable  in  AMNH 
52624.  Ventrolaterally  the  body  has  black  markings  that  form  an  irregular-bordered, 
continuous  or  interrupted  band  extending  from  axilla  to  groin.  The  femora  have  nar- 
row, dorsal,  dark  crossbars  (pale  interspaces  usually  three  to  five  times  wider),  and 
a coarse  pale-dark  marbling  (mostly  dark)  on  the  posterior  surfaces.  The  ventral  sur- 
face of  the  legs  also  has  coarse  dark  marbling  resulting  mostly  from  lateral  encroach- 
ment of  pattern.  The  top  of  the  head,  back,  and  usually  the  sides  of  the  body  are 
devoid  of  pattern;  occasionally,  a few  small  black  dots  occur  on  the  back.  The  ventral 
surface  of  the  head-body  may  lack  dark  marks  or  smudging  (LACM  35054;  UIMNH 
32444,  52783),  but  usually  the  chin-throat,  chest  and  anterior  part  of  the  abdomen 
are  dark-smudged  and  often  uniformly  dark.  The  features  of  color  and  pattern  are 
most  contrasting  in  young  and  subadults  (Fig.  5)  and  tend  to  become  obscured  in  the 
largest  frogs  (Fig.  1). 

Sexual  dimorphism . — There  seems  to  be  no  marked  discrepancy  in  the  maximum 
size  attained  by  males  (100  mm  SVL,  KU  87284)  and  females  (98  mm  SVL,  TCWC 
8546).  My  examination  of  large  males  does  not  reveal  vocal  sacs  or  slits.  A previously 
unreported,  secondary  sexual  character  in  males  is  the  occurence  of  whitish,  spinous, 
nuptial  excrescences  on  the  thumb  that,  at  maximal  development,  extend  onto  the 
chest  and  edge  of  the  lower  jaw.  All  frogs  having  these  spinous  excrescences  were 
determined  by  dissection  to  be  males.  There  is  no  pronounced  enlargement  of  the 
thumb  in  large  males.  A cluster  of  nuptial  spines  first  appears  on  the  joint  between 
the  penultimate  and  antepenultimate  phalanges.  The  white,  spinous  patch  then  spreads 
over  the  inner,  medial  surface  of  the  thumb.  With  further  development  small  excres- 
cences appear  on  the  medial  surfaces  of  the  second  and  third  fingers.  At  maximum 


4 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  300 


development  spinous  excrescences  also  occur  on  the  dorsal  surfaces  of  the  first  two 
fingers  (and  part  of  the  third  finger),  and  on  the  edge  of  lower  jaw  and  part  of  the 
chest;  the  excrescences  are  more  dense  on  the  thumb  joint  than  elsewhere  (Fig.  2). 
Spinous  patches  are  not  evident  until  males  attain  a body  length  of  about  70  mm; 
thereafter,  however,  the  development  and  extent  of  the  excrescences  does  not  seem 
to  be  directly  correlated  with  size.  The  smallest  male  with  spinous  patches  (covering 
only  proximalmost  joint  of  thumb)  is  74.2  mm  SVL  (KU  87280).  Two  other  males, 
both  dissected,  of  74.0  (UMMZ  125901)  and  84.4  (KU  87283)  mm  SVL  lack  ex- 
crescences. In  contrast,  a male  of  85.8  mm  SVL  (UIMNH  52782)  shows  the  most 
extensive  development  with  white,  spinous  excrescences  on  digits,  chest  and  lower 
jaw  (Fig.  2).  This  non-correlation  of  size  with  development  of  excrescences  would 
seem  to  reflect  a seasonal  change  with  maximum  development  during  the  breeding 
season.  If  so,  the  breeding  season  is  prolonged  since  the  two  males  showing  the  most 
extensive  development  of  white  excrescences,  UIMNH  52782  and  KU  87284  of  100.3 
mm  SVL,  were  collected  on  25  December  1962  and  3 June  1964,  respectively. 

Body  proportions . — Four  morphometric  characters  were  utilized.  The  following 
measurements  (mm)  were  recorded  with  a dial  calipers  (abbreviations  used  in  paren- 
theses): snout  to  vent  length  (SVL);  tibia  (tibio-fibula)  length  from  heel  to  fold  of 
skin  on  knee  (TL);  head  length  from  posterior  margin  of  tympanum  to  tip  of  snout 
(HL);  head  width  at  widest  point,  generally  at  level  of  posterior  margin  of  tympana 
(HW).  Six  proportions  of  body  parts  (HW/SVL,  HL/SVL,  HL/HW,  TL/SVL,  HL/ 
TL,  HW/TL)  were  plotted  against  SVL;  the  resultant  data  thus  reflect  relative  differ- 
ences in  width  of  head  and  length  of  leg.  Ontogenetic  variation  is  variable  depending 
on  the  ratios  utilized.  Sexual  dimorphism  is  lacking  and  the  sexes  are  combined  in 
the  analysis  of  variation.  The  data  are  presented  in  Table  1.  The  size-group  demar- 
cation (60  mm)  was  initially  determined  by  the  inspection  of  scattergrams  that  depicted 
the  most  pronounced  ontogenetic  variation  in  the  ratios  TL/SVL,  HL/TL,  and  HW/ 
TL. 

In  the  ratio  HW/SVL,  ontogenetic  variation  seems  to  be  negligible  or  the  HW 
increases  at  a slightly  slower  rate  than  the  SVL.  Ontogenetic  variation  is  somewhat 
more  pronounced  in  HL/SVL  with  the  HL  increasing  at  a slightly  slower  rate  than  the 
SVL.  Heads  are  usually  longer  than  broad  (HL/HW  exceeding  1.00).  Although  the 
data  suggest  much  variation  in  small  frogs,  the  heads  tend  to  become  relatively  more 
broad  with  increasing  size  with  some  of  the  largest  frogs  having  heads  broader  than 
long  (two  males).  The  ontogenetic  variation  in  HL/HW  thus  seems  to  be  reflected  in 
the  relatively  slow  rate  of  increase  of  HL  (HW  increasing  at  about  same  rate  as  SVL). 
There  is  more  pronounced  ontogenetic  variation  in  TL/SVL  with  the  TL  increasing 
at  a faster  rate  than  the  SVL;  large  frogs  have  on  the  average  relatively  longer  legs 
than  juveniles,  with  their  TL  averaging  slightly  more  than  half  the  body  length.  On- 
togenetic variation  is  also  expressed  when  the  ratios  HW/TL  and  HL/TL  are  plotted 
against  SVL,  with  the  variation  most  pronounced  in  HL/TL  (owing  to  slow  rate  of 
increase  of  HL  and  fast  rate  of  increase  of  TL  relative  to  that  of  SVL). 

In  comparing  ratios  derived  from  body  measurements  in  different  kinds  of  frogs, 
it  is  necessary  to  determine  the  presence  (if  any)  and  degree  of  ontogenetic  variation 
in  each.  The  comparison  of  ratios  may  be  taxonomically  useful  only  when  utilizing 


1978 


A Systematic  Review  of  the  Mexican  Frog 


5 


Figure  2.  Adult  male  of Rana  sierramadrensis  (UIMNH  52782,  85.8  mm  SVL)  showing  white, 
spinous,  excrescences  on  chest  and  lower  jaw  (above),  and  on  dorsal  surfaces  of  inner  three 
digits  of  right  forelimb  (below). 


6 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  300 


Table  1 

Ontogenetic  variation  in  six  body  proportions  of  Rana  sierramadrensis.  The  upper 
set  of  values  is  for  frogs  less  than  60  mm  S VL,  the  lower  set  for  frogs  60  mm  S VL  or 
larger.  The  data  for  each  proportion  are  mean  ± its  standard  error,  one  standard 
deviation,  and  range  (in  parentheses). 


Ratio 

N 

Variation 

HW/SVL 

14 

0.357  ± 0.005,  0.018  (0.33-0.39) 

36 

0.346  ± 0.002,  0.013  (0.31-0.37) 

HL/SVL 

14 

0.383  ± 0.004,  0.016  (0.36-0.41) 

36 

0.363  ± 0.003,  0.016  (0.33-0.41) 

HL/HW 

14 

1.072  ± 0.001,0.054(0.97-1.15) 

36 

1.043  ±0.306,0.035  (0.94-1.12) 

TL/SVL 

14 

0.506  ± 0.008,  0.031  (0.44-0.54) 

36 

0.568  ± 0.004,  0.025  (0.53-0.63) 

HW/TL 

14 

0.708  ± 0.002,  0.057  (0.63-0.81) 

36 

0.610  ± 0.004,  0.026  (0.56-0.66) 

HL/TL 

13 

0.746  ± 0.001 , 0.053  (0.67-0.84) 

36 

0.638  ± 0.005,  0.030  (0.58-0.68) 

restricted  size  groups.  An  on-going  study  of  the/?,  pustulosa-larahiimarae  complex, 
for  example,  indicates  differences  in  ontogenetic  variation  between  taxa  in  some  ra- 
tios. The  foregoing  data  for  Rana  sierramadrensis  may  be  useful  to  future  investi- 
gators in  subsequent  comparisons  with  related  species. 

Larvae. — The  larvae  or  tadpoles  of  Rana  sierramadrensis,  not  previously  de- 
scribed, are  discussed  below  and  compared  with  larvae  of  sympatric  and  related  ranid 
species  in  Mexico.  Three  tadpoles  (KU  87660,  N = 4)  from  3.3  km  north  San  Vi- 
cente, Guerrero,  920  m,  collected  on  8 June  1964  are  assigned  to  R.  sierramadrensis 
(see  below).  Another  tadpole  included  in  this  lot  of  four  tadpoles  is  smaller  (24  mm 
total  length)  than  the  other  three;  the  upper  tooth  rows  are  lacking  (three  lower  rows 
present),  the  lateral  margin  of  the  oral  disc  is  emarginate,  and  the  dark-blotched  tail 
fin  has  numerous  filamentous  melanophores.  This  small  tadpole  does  not  seem  to  be 
representative  of  Rana  sierramadrensis . The  description  is  based  on  the  three  larger 
larvae  that  exhibit  the  ranid  features  of  sinistral  spiracle,  dextral  anus,  eyes  more 
dorsal  than  lateral,  and  a papillate  fringe  along  the  lower  lip;  however,  the  lateral 
margins  of  the  oral  disc  are  not  emarginate. 

The  three  larvae  measure  38,  41,  and  50  mm  in  total  length  and  correspond  to 
limb  bud  stages  I and  V,  and  paddle  stage  X,  respectively,  according  to  the  ranid 
staging  system  of  Taylor  and  Kollros  (in  Rugh,  1962:70-71);  corresponding  stages  of 
Gosner  (1960)  are  25,  30,  and  35.  The  bodies  of  all  three  larvae  have  obscurely 
margined,  broad  pale  dorsolateral  areas.  All  three  larvae  either  lack  or  have  only 
sparse  pigmentation  on  the  tail  and  fins.  The  ventral  tail  fin  is  completely  devoid  of 
melanophores.  The  mostly  clear  dorsal  fin  has  only  a few  small  scattered  dark  pigment 


1978 


A Systematic  Review  of  the  Mexican  Frog 


7 


patches  (dendritic  melanophores)  and  in  some  places  the  otherwise  clear  parts  of  the 
fin  contain  some  scattered  punctate  (not  filamentous)  melanophores.  The  tail  mus- 
culature is  lightly  and  mostly  uniformly  pigmented,  most  dense  on  the  dorsal  half, 
and  lacks  definitive  spots-blotching.  The  relatively  streamlined  tail  with  the  reduced 
and  not  highly  arched  dorsal  fin  is  illustrated  (smallest  larva  of  38  mm)  in  figure  3D; 
however,  the  dorsal  fin  seems  to  be  slightly  more  arched  in  the  two  larger  larvae.  The 
lateral  margins  of  the  oral  disc  are  not  infolded  between  the  upper  and  lower  tooth 
rows.  There  are  submarginal  papillae  along  the  sides  of  the  upper  and  lower  lips.  The 
fleshy  flaplike  lower  lip  with  a papillate  fringe  seems  unusually  broad  (especially  larva 
of  38  mm)  and  may  be  folded  down  (Fig.  3C)  or  up  against  the  lower  tooth  rows. 
The  oral  disc  is  large;  the  relative  sizes  of  the  oral  discs  of  R.  sierramadrensis  and 
the  sympatric /?.  pustulosa  (stages  X (35)  and  II  (26),  respectively;  stages  of  Gosner, 
1960,  in  parentheses)  are  compared  in  similar-sized  larvae  in  figure  3A  and  3B.  The 
tooth  row  formula,  modified  from  Altig’s  terminology  (1970),  is  7(2-7)/ 1 -4/3(  1 ) ; the 
numbers  between  diagonal  lines  indicate  rows  of  marginal  teeth.  The  edges  of  the 
homy  beaks  are  pigmented  and  serrated.  One  of  the  larvae  (41  mm)  has  irregular 
alignment  of  some  upper  tooth  row  segments  that  number  eight  when  counted  on  the 
left  side.  Careful  manipulation  is  required  to  discern  the  short  seventh  upper  row  of 
teeth  on  the  right  side  of  the  largest  larva.  The  first  upper  tooth  row  is  continuous, 
all  other  upper  tooth  rows  are  separated,  most  by  the  upper  beak.  Larvae  may  have 
six  upper  tooth  rows  (and  perhaps  eight)  owing  to  ontogenetic  and/or  individual  vari- 


Figure  3.  A,  large  oral  disc  or  larva  (50  mm  total  length)  of  Rana  sierramadrensis  (KU  87660,  N = 
3);  B,  small  oral  disc  of  larva  (52  mm  total  length)  of  Rana  pustulosa,  compare  with  A;  C, 
mouthparts  of  larva  (38  mm)  of  R.  sierramadrensis;  D,  shape  and  melanophore  pattern  of  tail  of 
larva  (38  mm)  of  R.  sierramadrensis. 


B 


D 


8 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  300 


ation.  The  A-2  gap  is  narrow  (about  equal  to  the  width  of  five  or  six  individual  teeth) 
or  the  two  lateral  segments  are  nearly  juxtaposed  medially.  The  marginal  teeth  (corners 
of  oral  disc)  may  be  scattered  or  arranged  in  rows;  there  are  four  small  rows  on  the 
right  side  in  the  largest  larva.  The  first  lower  tooth  row  is  narrowly  interrupted  me- 
dially, the  gap  about  equal  in  length  to  the  medial  gap  in  row  A-2;  the  other  two  lower 
tooth  rows  are  continuous.  The  oral  disc  and  mouthparts  are  illustrated  in  figure  3C. 

The  three  tadpoles  assigned  to  R.  sierramadrensis  are  not  positively  identified 
through  direct  association  with  metamorphosed  individuals,  although  some  such  frogs 
(KU  87276-80)  were  collected  at  the  same  locality  as  the  larvae.  The  three  larvae  are 
presumed  to  be  of  this  species  based  on  marked  differences  when  compared  with 
numerous  larvae  of  thei?.  pipiens  andiC  tarahumarae  groups  from  western  Mexico. 
See  subsequent  section  for  comparison  of  larvae. 

Distribution 

Rana  sierramadrensis  occurs  along  tropical- subtropical,  foothill-montane,  swilt- 
flowing,  often  cascading,  streams  of  the  Sierra  Madre  del  Sur  in  the  Mexican  states 
of  Guerrero  and  Oaxaca  (Fig.  4).  A total  of  70  specimens  was  examined  (some  of 
these  are  late-transforming  frogs  or  are  damaged  and  were  not  included  in  the  data 


Figure  4.  Map  of  southern  Mexico  showing  localities  (solid  circles)  for  Rana  sierramadrensis 
in  the  states  of  Guerrero  and  Oaxaca.  Some  localities  a short  distance  apart  share  the  same 
symbol. 


1978 


A Systematic  Review  of  the  Mexican  Frog 


9 


analysis).  The  type-locality  (Agua  del  Obispo)  and  other  place-names  in  the  Chilpan- 
cingo  area  of  Guerrero  were  mapped  by  Davis  and  Dixon  (1959). 

Guerrero : near  Agua  del  Obispo,  between  Rincon  and  Cajones  (FMNH  100038, 
102201-02,  103917;  KU  87282;  TCWC  10992;  UIMNH  27053,  32442,  32444; 
UMMZ  115419,  125902-N  = 5,  125903;  USNM  114009-12;  9 km.  SW  Mazatlan, 
km.  337  (USNM  139724);  5.8  mi.  S Mazatlan  (UMMZ  115420);  3.7  mi.  S Mazatlan 
(UMMZ  115421);  1 mi.  SE  San  Andres  de  la  Cruz  (UMMZ  125901,  N = 4);  3.3 
km.  N San  Vicente  (KU  87276-80);  37  km.  S Chilpancingo  (KU  87281);  Acahuizotla 
(TCWC  8533-37,  8540-41,  10220-28,  26380;  LACM  35054-55);  6 mi.  NW  San  Je- 
ronimito  (UMMZ  125902,  N = 5). 

Oaxaca : 6 mi.  N San  Gabriel  Mixtepec  (MSU  10464);  6 km.  NNW  San  Gabriel 
Mixtepec  (KU  87283);  12  km.  NNW  San  Gabriel  Mixtepec  (KU  87284);  14.8  km. 
N San  Gabriel  Mixtepec  (KU  137539-40);  Rio  Jalatengo,  0.8  km.  S Jalatengo  (KU 
137538);  5.1  km.  S Jalatengo  (KU  137537);  13.1  km.  N Juchatengo  (KU  137541); 
11  km.  S Chicahuaxtla  (MSU  12660);  3 mi.  S Putla  (UIMNH  52783-84);  Cacahau- 
tepec,  at  river  (UIMNH  52782);  Santa  Lucia,  near  Tehuantepec  (AMNH  52624). 

Comparison  with  Rana  sinaloae 

Rana  sinaloae  shares  some  features  of  color  and  pattern  with  R.  sierramadrensis 
— evidence  of  dark  face  mask  bordered  below  by  distinct  white  supralabial  stripes; 
pale  dorsolateral  stripes;  top  of  head,  back  and  sides  of  body  mostly  devoid  of  pattern; 
narrow,  dark,  dorsal  crossbars  on  femora;  and  black,  irregular-bordered,  and  often 
interrupted,  ventrolateral  bands  on  body  (see  comparison  in  Fig.  5).  Rana  sinaloae 
is  also  similar  to  R.  sierramadrensis  in  the  body  proportions  affected  by  ontogenetic 
variation,  especially  HL/SVL  and  TL/SVL.  The  two  species  both  have  heads  that  in 
most  specimens  are  longer  than  broad,  and  have  relatively  long  legs  (TL  increasing 
at  faster  rate  than  SVL). 

Rana  sinaloae  differs  from/?,  sierramadrensis  in  having  folds  above  and  behind 
the  tympana,  in  lacking  distinct  black  posttympanic  bars,  in  lacking  distinct  black 
lateral  borders  along  the  dorsolateral  folds,  and  in  having  the  dorsolateral  folds  (when 
present)  terminating  before  the  groin.  Perhaps  most  important,  the  breeding  males  of 
R.  sinaloae  have  swollen  glandular  thumb  pads,  instead  of  the  non-enlarged  thumbs 
and  white,  spinous  excrescences  of  males  of  R.  sierramadrensis.  Rana  sinaloae  shares 
all  these  features  with  the  other  included  species  of  the/?,  tarahumarae  group.  There 
are  also  corresponding  differences  in  the  larvae  (see  below).  Rana  sinaloae  is  con- 
sidered to  be  a member  of  the  Rana  tarahumarae  group  and  not  a member  of  the 
Rana  palmipes  species  group 


Comparison  of  Larvae 

Since/?,  sierramadrensis  is  geographically  sympatric  with  frogs  of  the/?,  tar- 
ahumarae group  (currently  referred  to  /?.  pustulosa ) and  /?.  pipiens  group  (hereafter 
referred  to  as  /?.  pipiens ),  larvae  of  any  one,  or  two,  or  all  three,  species  could  be 
expected  to  occur  in  a random  sample.  The  larvae  of/?,  pipiens  are  easily  distinguished 
from  those  of/?,  sierramadrensis  in  having  a maximum  of  three  upper  tooth  rows 


10 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  300 


Figure  5 .Rana  sierramadrensis  (upper  left,  MSU  12660,  51.3  mm  S VL,  1 1 km.  S Chicahuaxtla, 
Oaxaca),  Rana  sinaloae  (upper  right,  MSU  12661 , 75.8  mm  S VL,  22  km.  WSW  Ameca,  Jalisco), 
and  Rana  maculata  (bottom,  AMNH,  88  mm  S VL,  Finca  El  Rosario  Vista  Hermosa,  ca.  7 km  N 
Escuintla  Guatemala,  from  kodachrome  by  Richard  G.  Zweifel),  for  comparison  in  pattern. 


1978 


A Systematic  Review  of  the  Mexican  Frog 


11 


(but  usually  only  two),  no  marginal  teeth,  more  extensively  pigmented  dorsal  tail  fins, 
and  in  having  the  lateral  margins  of  the  oral  disc  emarginate.  The  larvae  of  R.  pus- 
tulosa  usually  have  some  dark  marks  and  blotches  on  the  dorsal  tail  fins  and  mus- 
culature (mostly  clear  in  R.  sierramadrensis ) and  at  least  distally  on  the  ventral  fins 
(virtually  lacking  in  R.  sierramadrensis)',  in  some  larvae  of R.  pustulosa  with  relatively 
clear  dorsal  fins  small  punctate  melanophores  are  more  extensive  than  in  R.  sierra- 
madrensis. The  oral  disc  is  relatively  smaller  in  R.  pustulosa  (about  two-thirds)  than 
in  R.  sierramadrensis,  and  the  lateral  margins  are  infolded  in  larvae  of/?.  pustulosa 
(see  comparison  in  figure  3 A,  B).  Less  reliable  is  the  number  of  upper  tooth  rows  in 
distinguishing  the  two  species,  which  is  usually  five  (maximal  at  six)  in  larvae  of  R. 
pustulosa,  and  which  is  probably  six  but  certainly  seven  in  larvae  of  R.  sierramad- 
rensis. The  larvae  of  R.  sinaloae  resemble  those  of  R.  sierramadrensis  only  in  having 
a mostly  clear  dorsal  tail  fin;  the  larvae  of  R.  sinaloae  otherwise  are  not  different  from 
those  of  R.  pustulosa  and  are  distinguished  from  larvae  of  R.  sierramadrensis  by  the 
same  features  that  differentiate  those  two  species. 

The  larvae  of  R.  sierramadrensis  are  easily  distinguished  from  larvae  of  both  R. 
maculata  ( macroglossa ) and  R.  palmipes  (comparative  data  in  Volpe  and  Harvey, 
1958)  in  having  only  three  lower  tooth  rows,  and  in  the  mostly  clear  tail  fins.  The 
larvae  of  R.  sierramadrensis  may  have  more  highly  arched  dorsal  fins  than  larvae  of 
R.  maculata.  The  larvae  of/?.  sierramadrensis  and/?,  maculata  otherwise  share  sev- 
eral features  that  distinguish  them  from  larvae  of  R.  palmipes.  The  larvae  of  both 
species  have  a maximum  of  six  or  seven  upper  tooth  rows  (four  or  maximum  of  five 
in R.  palmipes ),  have  a narrow  medial  A-2  gap  (wider  in/?,  palmipes ),  have  marginal 
teeth  (lacking  in/?,  palmipes ),  and  have  a suctorial  oral  disc  that  lacks  infolded  lateral 
margins  (infolded  in/?,  palmipes ). 

Relationships 

Rana  sierramadrensis  is  currently  placed  in  the  Rana  palmipes  species  group 
(Zweifel  1954).  So  far  as  known  the  white,  spinous  excrescences  in  males  of/?,  sier- 
ramadrensis are  unique.  One  seemingly  trenchant  feature  is  shared  with  the  member 
species  of  the/?,  tarahumarae  group — three  lower  rows  of  teeth  in  larvae  (the  number 
may  be  variable  in  /?.  sierramadrensis,  but  is  invariably  three  in  R.  tarahumarae 
group).  All  other  member  species  of  the  /?.  palmipes  group  have  larvae  with  four 
lower  tooth  rows  (/?.  palmipes,  R.  maculata,  R.  vibicaria,  R.  warschewitschii)',  Lee 
(1976)  referred  some  peculiar  tadpoles  from  Belize  with  five  lower  tooth  rows  to/?. 
maculata . 

Variation  in  the  two  species/?,  palmipes  and/?,  maculata  (nearest  geographically 
to/?,  sierramadrensis)  has  not  been  investigated  in  detail.  In  addition  to  other  features 
distinguishing  the  two  species,  /?.  palmipes  is  especially  distinctive  from  /?.  sierra- 
madrensis in  males  having  enlarged,  glandular  thumb  pads;  males  of  /?.  palmipes 
based  on  statements  by  Boulenger  (1920:417),  Taylor  (1952:908),  and  Zweifel 
(1967:54)  seem  to  have  internal  slits  but  lack  external  vocal  sacs.  Rana  maculata 
differs  from  /?.  sierramadrensis  in  having  well-developed  vocal  sac  slits,  but  resem- 
bles/?.  sierramadrensis  in  having  the  thumbs  “not  larger  than  in  females”  (Smith 
1959:216);  presumably  males  of/?,  maculata  lack  the  white,  spinous  excrescences  of 


12 


Contributions  in  Science 


No.  300 


R.  sierramadrensis.  Rana  sierramadrensis  seems  to  be  most  closely  allied  to,  and  the 
trans-isthmian  counterpart  of,  R.  maculata.  Aside  from  the  above-mentioned  differ- 
ence and  those  that  readily  distinguish  the  larvae  (tail  pigmentation  and  number  of 
lower  tooth  rows),  both  species  share  general  features  of  pattern  (Fig.  5),  occupy 
upland  habitats,  and  have  larvae  with  stream-adapted  modifications.  In  pattern,  R. 
maculata  differs  from  R.  sierramadrensis  in  having  wider  dark  bars  on  the  femora, 
in  usually  lacking  a continous  black,  ventrolateral  band,  and  (at  least  in  some  specimens) 
in  having  a green  dorsum  (Kodachrome  slide  of  R.  G.  Zweifel,  Fig.  5). 

RESUMEN 

La  variacion  de  Rana  sierramadrensis  se  discute.  Los  renacuajos  son  descritos 
por  primera  vez.  Una  caracterfstica  secundaria  sexual  no  conocida  es  la  presencia  de 
tuberculos  espinosos  blancos  en  los  no  engrandecidos  pulgares,  pecho,  y mandfbulas 
inferiores  de  los  machos.  Rana  sierramadrensis  se  retiene  en  el  grupo/? . palmipes.  Rana 
sinaloae  se  traslada  al  grupo  R.  tarahumarae,  qual  se  propone  para  inclusion  de  las 
especiesR.  tarahumarae,  R.  pustulosa,  R.  sinaloae,  R.  pueblae,  y R.  johni,  Rana 
sierramadrensis  ocurre  solamente  en  la  Sierra  Madre  del  Sur  en  los  estados  Mexicanos 
de  Guerrero  y Oaxaca,  y parece  ser  relacionada  aR.  maculata. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Altig,  R.  1970.  A key  to  the  tadpoles  of  the  continental  United  States  and  Canada.  Herpeto- 
logica  26:180-207. 

Boulenger,  G.  A.  1920.  A monograph  of  the  American  frogs  of  the  genus  Rana.  Proc.  Amer. 
Acad.  Arts  Sci.  55(9):41 3-480. 

Case,  S.  M.  1976.  Biochemical  systematics  of  Rana  in  western  North  America.  Herp.  Review 
7(2): 76  (Abstract). 

Cochran,  D.  M.  1961 . Type  specimens  of  reptiles  and  amphibians  in  the  United  States  National 
Museum.  Bull.  U.S.  Nat.  Mus.  No.  220,  xv  -f-  291  pp. 

Davis,  W.  B.  and  J.  R.  Dixon.  1959.  Snakes  of  the  Chilpancingo  region,  Mexico.  Proc.  Biol. 
Soc.  Washington  72:79-92. 

Gosner,  K.  L.  1960.  A simplified  table  for  staging  anuran  embryos  and  larvae  with  notes  on 
identification.  Herpetologica  16:183-190. 

Lee,  J.  C.  1976.  Rana  maculata  Brocchi,  an  addition  to  the  herpetofauna  of  Belize.  Herpeto- 
logica 32(2):21 1-214. 

Rugh,  R.  1962.  Experimental  embryology.  Ed.  3,  Burgess  Publ.  Co.,  Minneapolis,  Minnesota, 
pp.  ix  + 501. 

Smith,  H.  M.  1959.  Herpetozoa  from  Guatemala.  I.  Herpetologica  15:210-216. 

, D.  A.  Langebartel,  andK.  L.  Williams.  1964.  Herpetological  type-specimens  in  the 

University  of  Dlinois  Museum  of  Natural  History.  Illinois  Biol.  Monogr.  No.  32,  Univ. 
Illinois  Press,  80  pp. 

Taylor,  E.  H.  1939.  New  species  of  Mexican  tailless  Amphibia.  Univ.  Kansas  Sci.  Bull.  (1938) 
25(17):385-405. 

1944.  Present  location  of  certain  herpetological  and  other  types  (sic)  specimens.  Univ. 

Kansas  Sci.  Bull.  30(1 1):  1 17— 187. 

1952.  The  frogs  and  toads  of  Costa  Rica.  Univ.  Kansas  Sci.  Bull.  35(5):577-942. 


1978 


A Systematic  Review  of  the  Mexican  Frog 


13 


Volpe,  E.  P.  and  S.  M.  Harvey.  1958.  Hybridization  and  larval  development  in Rana palmipes 
Spix.  Copeia  1958(3):  197-207. 

Zweifel,  R.  G.  1954.  A new  frog  of  the  genus  Rana  from  western  Mexico  with  a key  to  the 
Mexican  species  of  the  genus.  Bull.  Southern  California  Acad.  Sci.  53(3):131  — 141 . 

1955.  Ecology,  distribution,  and  systematics  of  frogs  of  th eRana  boylei  group.  Univ. 

California  Publ.  Zool.  54(4):207-292. 

1967.  Systematic  status  of  the  Central  American  frog,  Rana  miadis.  Herpetologica 

23(  1):54— 56. 


Accepted  for  publication  March  16,  1977. 


* ■ 


■ 

l 


3 


m ' vw  ^ x^vAsv^y  rn  'tl  rn 

co  ± o>  x co 

yen  libraries  Smithsonian  institution  noiidxiisni  nvinoshuins  S3 

Z %*  _ z * w z cn 

< ^ S A 2 S 


*1 

5 > s x^osv^  > 

UTlON^NOlinillSN!  NVIN0SH1I S 3 I 8V8  8 il^U  BRAR  I ES^SMITHSONIAN  INJ 
oo  \ cn  ____  ~ ao 


ban  LIBRARIES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOIlfUliSNI  NVINOSHIIIAIS  S3 
2 i-  z r-  . z 


H 

CO 


^ r^)  * 

m ^ rn 

UTION^  NOHnillSNl“NVINOSHllWS  S3IHV88  1 1 ~L  I B R A R I E$  ^SMITHSONIAN  IN 

CO  z __  co  z .&**  • £ 2: 

* H AS*  /W^m  =5  .,*{  Am " 5 =5  /f 


\ 


c/>  ,y^  co  'tttSqf  c/j  ■sjysjWjft 

> I | <#-  s 

Iban^t-IBRARI  ES  ^SMITHSON  I AN  INSTITUTION  NOIlfUliSNI  NVINOSHIIWS^S^ 
^ ^ _ ^ w 5 ^ 

X* . r itl  (^rU^nTX.  j V^ii  C\/4*\. 


UJ 


P/  rn  ~ ^ 

O \g>.  pcy^  X^UllS^X  Q _ 

UTION  N0lini!lSNl”NVIN0SHll!NSSS3  IBVdail^UBRARI  ES^SMSTHSONIAN^iN 
2 r-  2 _ r~  2 

CO  ”*  — “ CO  ± CO 

/H8I1  LIBRARIES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOIlfUliSNI  NVIN0SH1IWS  S3 
2 \ co  ^ _ z * cn  z 

2 H ^KWfcA  2 <k...  3 4E|.  g 


| -\N^T  > ^2^  2 \*  S 

UTION  ^NOUniliSNI^NVINOSHltWS^Sa  I HVHanZLIB  RAR  lES^SMlTHSONlAN  IN 

CO  ^ z \ m ^ _ X co  “ 

5\  ^ xss2$^  w V ^ w w 


<aan  libraries  Smithsonian  institution  NoiiniusNi  nvinoshiiins  s: 

2 <~  2 I-  , . . Z 


co  ~ t/>  £;  co 

H LIBRARIES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOUfUllSNI  NVIN0SH1IWS  $3  I BV* 

2 02  . ..  2 * to  2 CO 

< ^ s < ‘a  2 ^ 2 


O /P^':  X life,  Sjj  O 

5 ' > *'  ^ 5 > 

IN  ^NOlinillSNl^NVlNOSHlIINS^SS  I d VH  8 Il^ll  B RAR  I ES^SMITHSONIAN^INSTITU 


ij  vv:  __ 

q XOvosv^ 
2 

n LIBRARIES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOUfllliSNI  NVINOSHilWS  S3 1 BVI 

w 2 , ..  .-5  2 8 J&'*  ° 


m ^ m ^ XfoTusgx  m 

)N  NOfXniliSNI~"NVINOSHIHNS  S3  I H Vd  8 ll”“n  B RAR  I £S ^SMITHSONIAN ~ TLJ 

CO  2 ....  05  2 v,  CO  Z 

< X^PVaX  S 


X 
CO 

> s ^OiDcy  g "41^  2 > ^oTTT^ 

IT  LIBRARIES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOIJ.fUIJ.SNI  NVIN0SH.LHMs‘"s3 1 a VI 

^ _ 05  X . CO  — fO 


CO 


*a  or  /pj 

< o[ 

$/  or  v°l 

o p<^X  7 O N^vocpX  2 Q 

>N  Xoun.mSNXlW|NOSHiIWS”s3  I B VB  B II^L' B RAR  1 ES^SMITHSONIAN“lNSTITU 

8 5 I ^ik  5 


m ■'  5*  XJ^ASt^X  pr{  X^osv^X  frj  XXosv' 

05  CO  5 CO 

n LIBRARIES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOUfUllSN!  NVIN0SH1IINS  S3IBVI 

Z <*  CO  2 CO 

^ 2 < 


W’d^'  ^ 

^ I ags'  x 

w _ z s > is 

iN  N0iinXllSNI_NVIN0SHillNSWS3  I BVH  B iXl  I B RAR  I ES^SMITHSONIAN^INSTITU' 

05  — , ^ 2 \ 05  CO 

5f  52  A,  - w x^x  Oi 

-*  ***  * m SdMWhd\  h - Wm 

. < 

5 5 ' ' 5 

•J  2 -I  2 _j  Z 

11  LIBRARIES  SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  NOliflillSNI  NVINOSHilWS  S3 1 UVi 

f-  ^ z I-  z r 2 

5 2 . . ,m  S = ,.4:s«  o 


£0 


'Ill KsSSEffiFHB! 


3 9088  014Q2  9383