M;-:-ED
• • •
THE-CORONATIO
BRITAIN -AND
©THE-BRITIS
EMPERORy^
OF -EDWARD
IRELAND -AND
.DOMINIONS
EDWARD -THE'-'
CONFESSOR
'ft
z."
m
THE CORONATION OF
EDWARD THE SEVENTH
CONTENTS
BOOK I
THE GROWTH OF THE SENTIMENT OF LOYALTY IN THE
BRITISH NATION
CHAP. PAGE
I. THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY ... 3
BOOK II
THE CORONATIONS AND SIMILAR CEREMONIES ON THE EUROPEAN
CONTINENT IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY
I. EUROPEAN CORONATIONS ..... 35
II. THE CORONATION OF NAPOLEON I. .... 44
III. THE PROCLAMATION OF THE FIRST GERMAN EMPEROR . 64
BOOK III
THE CORONATION OF QUEEN VICTORIA
I. THE INAUGURATION OF A NEW ERA .... 97
II. THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA. ... 122
III. THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION AND THE MONARCHY . . 171
BOOK IV
THE CORONATION OF KING EDWARD VII.
I. THE KING, THE PEOPLE AND THE CONSTITUTION . . 199
II. THE GATHERING OF AN EMPIRE .... 219
III. THE ILLNESS OF THE KING ..... 231
vi CONTENTS
CHAP. PAGE
IV. WESTMINSTER ABBEY . . . '..... . 237
V. THE CROWNING OF THE KING ..... 278
VI. THE IMPERIAL CROWN ...... 318
APPENDICES
I. LIST OF PERSONS PRESENT AT THE CORONATION OF THEIR
MAJESTIES KING EDWARD VII. AND QUEEN ALEXANDRA 335
II. THE SHORTENED FORM AND ORDER OF THEIR MAJESTIES'
CORONATION ....... 433
III. A MEMORANDUM OF SERVICES OF INDIAN REGIMENTS
REPRESENTED AT THE CORONATION, AND A NOTE ON
THE COLONIAL FORCES PRESENT . . . . 455
INDEX . 481
BOOK I
THE GROWTH OF THE SENTIMENT OF LOYALTY
IN THE BRITISH NATION
[Owing to the scope of this work, many international,
historical and constitutional questions are treated on
which opinion is necessarily not unanimous. The
author, therefore, wishes it to be understood that he
is solely responsible for all that is contained in these
pages.]
CHAPTER I
THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY
BY the hazard of an untimely malady the Coronation
of King Edward VII. took place on an anniversary
most notable in the annals of regality.
The date of August 9th, 1902, to which the ceremony
was postponed, by reason of the illness of the King, was
the hundred and tenth anniversary of the last day of the
ancient French monarchy. In the experiences of modern
nations it would be hard to find a contrast more impressive
than in the circumstances of the two historic days.
On August 9, 1792, the King and Queen of France,
besieged in their palace of the Tuileries by their own sub-
jects, were awaiting the tocsin which at midnight they knew
was to toll the knell of the monarchy, after eight hundred
years of hereditary sway under which France had grown
into a great nation.1 For the institution of royalty there
was no hope left, save in the chance of successful foreign
intervention. The lives of the sovereigns would be secure
only if the alien soldiery in their service could aid their
escape from the furious population of the capital, now rein-
forced by the fierce battalions from Marseilles, which had
arrived in Paris, chanting their new revolutionary war-song.
We all know how the morrow ended. The Swiss guard
massacred, the Tuileries cannonaded, and Louis, no longer
1 Mimoires de Cldry, valet de chambre du Dauphin. Dernitres anntes de Louis XVI., par
Franfois Hu6, huissier de la chambre du Roi,
3
4 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
a king, with Marie Antoinette immured in the convent of
the Feuillans, the first of their prisons on the way to the
guillotine.
On August 9, 1902, the King and Queen of England
went forth from their palace to be crowned, amid the acclama-
tions of their subjects, doubly joyful because the shadow
of a great disaster had hovered over the royal house and
had passed away. They, too, represented a monarchy more
than eight centuries old. But instead of a people chafing
to be rid of sovereignty and its symbols, the throng which
they saw on the road to Westminster cheered not only a
popular prince who had valiantly overcome a plague of
sickness, but a monarch whose crown, about to be assumed,
had become an emblem of Empire wider than Darius or the
early Caesars had ever dreamed of. Hence it was that the
population of the capital was reinforced not merely by
provincial sightseers, such as had repaired to previous
coronations from the counties of Great Britain, but by
British subjects from the farthest ends of the earth. Hence
it was that the troops lining the streets were not simply
soldiers of the standing army. The loyal press of a
London crowd was contained by British citizens from
Canada, from Australia, from New Zealand, wearing the
khaki which, whatever its fate as a warlike uniform, will
ever be associated with the help nobly given by the
colonies to the mother-country struggling for supremacy in
South Africa. In guarding the capital on Coronation-day
these gallant white settlers of our distant possessions were
peacefully aided by dark warriors from our Indian Empire,
of military tradition more ancient than that of their con-
querors. Wren's steeples at Westminster rocked with the
clanging of bells, while the Tower of London, more aged
THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY 5
than the throne, exchanged convivial cannonades with the
modern greenswards of Hyde Park. The streets re-echoed
with the national hymn, pacific in its melody, compared with
the defiant Marseillaise. Its refrain was handed down from
the foundation of a monarchy, five hundred years old when
the Tarquins ruled in Rome, and possibly coeval with the
reign of Theseus at Athens or of Priam at Troy1 — first
formulated at the anointing of a Syrian herdsman, when
" All the people shouted and said, God save the King."
It would be a pastime unworthy of a historian to strain
a comparison between two events long distant from one.
another, merely because of a coincidence of days of the
month. But there is a connection between the downfall of
the ancient regime in France and the consecration of the
British Empire in the person of the King of England which
is manifest to all who have studied the intervening history
of Europe. At vespers on the Sunday before the sack of
the Tuileries, when the doomed king and queen attended
divine service for the last time, in the Chapel Royal of the
palace, it was observed that the choir-men sang with insolent
loudness the words of the Magnificat : Deposuit potentes de
sede? The general terms in which is couched that revolution-
ary verse, ascribed by Saint Luke to the Blessed Virgin,
well indicated the mental attitude of the French population
1 Chronologers used to assign the date of noo B.C. to the election of King Saul, and placed
the siege of Troy in the same century before the Christian era. The adventure of Theseus with
Helen, before Menelaus or Paris came upon the scene, places his reign in the well-filled lifetime
of the heroine of the Trojan War. But the Higher Criticism is as merciless to Aryan as to
Semitic legend, and the existence of Theseus, in spite of Mr A. J. Evans" discoveries at Crete,
is put in the same category of fable as that of the first shepherd-king of Israel. My friend, M.
Perrot, the head of the Ecole Normale and the most eminent Hellenic archaeologist in France,
says: " Thes£e est une creation de 1'orgueil national des Ath^niens." Perhaps 3000 years
hence the Higher Criticism will declare that Queen Victoria was the creation of the national
pride of the British.
2 Mhnoires de A/me. Cam fan, c. xxi.
6 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
to the institution of monarchy. It was not merely Louis
Capet (as they inaccurately called their sovereign) and his
wife, " the Austrian," whom they wished to be rid of. Such
was their doctrinaire fury, fostered by the superficial teach-
ing of the philosophers, that their desire was to put down
from their seats the hereditary rulers of all civilised countries.
"Wherever there is a throne we have an enemy," said
Herault de Sechelles the year before at the Legislative
Assembly ; l while Danton, who was fated to die with him
on the same scaffold, declared, at the Convention, whose
first act had been the formal abolition of royalty in France,
that that newly elected body ought to act as a committee
of insurrection against all the kings in the universe.2
The French revolutionists did not confine themselves to
mouthing their international theories. The Convention
sent agents to London and other capitals to spread the
revolutionary doctrine : it encouraged deputations to come
from England and other countries to discuss with it the best
ways of securing "liberty": it issued a decree promising
fraternal aid to all peoples that should revolt against their
established rulers.3 All monarchies were thus put on their
defence, and constitutional England had to follow the lead
of the despotisms of the Continent in taking up the
challenge thrown down by the champions of the new order
of things. It was the war with the French Republic,
under the conduct of Mr Pitt, which first counteracted
the diffusion of anti-monarchic principles among the people
of England. They were subsequently checked at the
fountain-head by the Jacobin general, Bonaparte, who
organised the Revolution in a way unexpected by philo-
1 Moniteur, x. 762. Assemble Legislative : Stance du 28 D6cembre 1791.
2 Convention Nationale, Sept. -Oct. 1792. 3 D6cret du 19 Xovembre 1792.
THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY 7
sophers or terrorists, and at the same time made it odious to
the English nation.
The revolutionary germ had never taken root in England
as a purely philosophic doctrine. Thomas Paine, who
argued that "all hereditary government is in its nature
tyranny," had no extensive following among his country-
men, in spite of the large circulation of his reply to Burke's
memorable Reflections on the French Revolution — the Rights
of Man, which Erskine brilliantly defended when the author
was indicted for the publication of that work.1 Had Paine
been a popular hero he might have braved his condemnation,
instead of flying, before his trial, to France, where citizenship
had already been conferred on him, and where on landing
he was sent by the Pas de Calais as deputy to the Conven-
tion. In that relentless assembly, four months later, he
voted and spoke with great courage against the execution
of Louis XVI., thus showing how relatively moderate were
the extremest revolutionary opinions produced on English
soil. But although the progress of the revolutionary
doctrine in England was arrested by the spectacle of
what it had led to in France, circumstances combined
to attenuate the loyalty of the people and to spread the
spirit of disaffection, first aroused by the preaching of the
anti-monarchical gospel in France, in the period which had
seen our revolted American colonies established as a
1 Rights of Man, being an answer to Afr Burke's attack on the French Revolution, by
Thomas Paine, Secretary for Foreign Affairs to Congress in the American War, 1791. In
addition to the publication of numerous editions of the Rights of Alan strong efforts were
made to propagate the revolutionary doctrine preached by Paine. Thus at a meeting of the
Society for Constitutional Information, held at the Crown and Anchor Tavern, June isth, 1792,
it was " resolved that 12,000 copies of Mr Paine's letter to Mr Secretary Dundas be printed for
the purpose of being distributed gratuitously to our correspondents throughout Great Britain."
Dundas had, as Secretary of State, opened the debate in the House of Commons on May 25th,
1792, on the proclamation for suppressing seditious publications, with special reference to the
Rights of A fan. Paine was tried at Guildhall before Lord Kenyon on December i8th, 1792.
8 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
republic.1 In the first place, the war with France, which
had diverted the nation from theoretical sympathy with the
French Revolution, while enriching certain classes of the
community, soon caused lasting distress among the people.
Economic trouble has always been a more potent factor
of sedition than the propagation of doctrine. Even the
French Revolution, in the earlier stages of which ideas
played a most important part, would not have attained
sufficient force to sweep away the monarchy, but for its
economic causes. In England, where the genius of the
people is not doctrinaire, the governing institutions have
never, since 1688, been menaced at times of well-distributed
national prosperity. To the popular distress was added
the discontent inspired in all classes by certain members of
the family of the sovereign, himself disabled by mental
disorder, which had first temporarily afflicted him on the
eve of the French Revolution. When the malady of
George III. became chronic and necessitated a permanent
regency, even highly-placed Englishmen became luke-
warm in their attachment to the royal house. Colonel
Wardle, as mover of the appointment of the parliamentary
committee to investigate the conduct of the Duke of York,
which brought about that prince's resignation as Com-
1 The student of English chronicles of the end of the eighteenth century finds in unexpected
quarters symptoms of a lack of veneration for monarchical institutions. In the privately
printed Harcourt Papers there is a letter from Bishop Vernon (who was afterwards Archbishop
Vernon-Harcourt of York) addressed to Dr Paley, whom he had preferred to the Archdeaconry
of Carlisle two years after his own appointment to that see by Mr Pitt in 1791. In it he
criticises a passage in Paley's Moral Philosophy which ran as follows : " The divine right of
kings is like the divine right of constables, a right ratified, we humbly presume, by the
divine approbation, so long as obedience to their authority appears to be necessary or con-
ducive to the common welfare." In deference to the Bishop's strictures Paley altered,
in subsequent editions, the sentence in which he compared kings with constables into
one which begins: "The right of all public functionaries is the same." He says in a
letter to the Bishop, "This alteration appears to meet the objection to the mode of expres-
sion, which, I take it, is the thing objected to."
THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY 9
mander-in-Chief, was voted the freedom of the City of
London,1 while within the House of Commons he was
supported by members as respectable as Wilberforce, at the
height of his renown, and Althorp, at the beginning of his
career. Three years later, at the trial of Leigh Hunt for
libelling the Prince Regent, Brougham defended the
accused with such sympathetic warmth that Chief Justice
Ellenborough, in summing up, declared that the eminent
advocate " had inoculated himself with all the poison and
mischief which the libel was calculated to effect." 2
The consequence of this combination of influences, —
the doctrine first imported from France, the public distress
and the feeling inspired by some of the royal princes — was
that when the war was ended, near the close of the long
reign of George III., a contemporary historian, reviewing
the situation, avowed with regret that in all ranks of society
there was " scarcely a company in which certain illustrious
personages were mentioned without their names being
degraded by some disrespectful or reproachful epithet, the
loyalty of the most loyal having become a very cool and
calculating sentiment."3 Impartial observers began, with
fear, to wonder whether the ancient monarchy of England,
which had been renewed at the last English Revolution
without a symptom of republicanism manifesting itself in
the land,4 might not go the way of the old regime in France.
These fears were rendered acute by the death of the
1 "Delicate Investigation," January-March 1809. 2 December 9, 1812.
3 An Impartial History of the Naval, Military and Political Events in Europe from the
commencement of the French Revolution to the entrance of the Allies into Paris, by Hewson
Clarke, Esq. (the "Sizar of Emmanuel" of the Postscript to the Second Edition of English
Bards and Scotch Reviewers'],
* " It may be confidently asserted that no republican party had any existence. ... It
would be difficult to name five individuals to whom even a speculative preference of a common-
wealth may with probability be ascribed." — Hallam : Const. Hist., ch. xv., William III.
io THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Princess Charlotte of Wales, the only child of the Regent.
No royal mourning in the annals of England had caused
such widespread sorrow since the eldest son of James I., a
prince of remarkable merit and promise, died in his
eighteenth year,1 three months before his sister married the
Elector Palatine and thus became the mother of the
Hanoverian dynasty, which was called to the English
throne in consequence of the character and policy of the
heirs of his brother Charles. The Princess Charlotte
resembled Prince, Henry of Wales in the possession of a
sentiment which our generation would call imperial instinct,
and which moved that gallant youth to protest against his
pusillanimous father's treatment of the illustrious Raleigh.2
The daughter of the Prince Regent while staying at Wey-
mouth at the age of nineteen insisted on visiting one of the
king's ships on a stormy day, and when the Bishop of
Salisbury, who was in attendance, urged that her father
might be displeased at her perilous adventure, she replied,
with spirit, " Queen Elizabeth took delight in her navy
and never had any fear of going on board a man-of-war, in
whatever state the sea might be."3
1 November 6, 1612.
2 " It was his saying ' Sure no king but my father would keep such a. bird in a cage.1 " — A
Detection of the Court and State of England during the last four reigns and the Interregnum,
by Roger Coke, Lond. 1694. The author was the grandson of Sir Edward Coke, who as
Attorney-General treated Raleigh with great brutality at his trial. Another testimony to the
character of Prince Henry of Wales is found in the Ambassade de M. Antoine Le Fevre de la
Boderie en Angleterre, 1606-11. The French ambassador recounts that taking leave of the
Prince he found him employed in the exercise of the pike : " Tell your King," said he, " in
what occupation you left me engaged."
3 The Princess showed so much masculine courage on this occasion that she had to be de-
fended from the charge of bringing ridicule upon the Bishop ; for she mounted the ship's side
from the tossing barge like a seaman and ordered a chair to be let down for the venerable
prelate and her suite, Memoirs of Her late Royal Highness Charlotte Augusta Princess of
Wales, by Robert Huish, Esq., 1818. Her Elizabethan qualities inspired the Poet Laureate,
Southey, in a " Nuptial Song" to foresee —
" Charlotte's fame
Surpass our great Eliza's golden name."
THE EVOLUTION OP BRITISH LOYALTY n
It was the same patriotic ardour which had already
induced the Princess Charlotte to refuse the hand of the
Prince of Orange, from fear of having to reside abroad
during a part of the year. When at last she married the
husband of her choice, Prince Leopold of Saxe-Coburg-
Saalfeld,1 who was willing to make his home in England,
there were no bounds to the enthusiasm of the people,
whose hopes were the more fondly fixed on the young
Princess by reason of the unhappy differences which had
separated her parents. Her example sufficed to set at
naught the tradition which makes the fifth month of the
year unlucky for weddings, and when hers was solemnised
on May 2, 1816, nearly eight hundred couples in England
chose that day to get married. In her case the ancient
prejudice against May marriages 2 was justified. After
eighteen months of happy union this admirable Princess
was laid in the royal vault at Windsor, with her little son
who had never seen the light. The subsequent career of
An imperious temper was the only fault imputed to her : but that was not a defect in the
heiress of the Crown of England. Her brief "Remains," collected from her girlish note-
books, show that she resembled Queen Elizabeth also in her intellectual gifts. Her fugitive
verses were worthier of the name of poetry than those in which Southey sung her virtues.
Her classical acquirements have never been attained by any princess since the days of Roger
Ascham's great pupil. There is a remarkable fragment of hers, in which she compares with
a parallel passage in the Carmen Seculare, the well-known lines : —
" Tu regere imperio populos, Romane, memento ;
Hae tibi erunt artes : pacisque imponere morem
Parcere subjectis et debellare superbos."
It is evident that at the victorious close of the war, the young princess was likening in her
mind the might of Britain with that of Rome. No one seems to have noted the ominous
significance of the quotation from the Aeneid, taken as it was from the passage which
immediately precedes the immortal verses in memory of Marcellus the heir of Augustus, cut
off at the same age as the Princess Charlotte.
1 The Dukes of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld became Dukes of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha by the
Treaty of Succession of November 12, 1826. On the acquisition of the Duchy of Gotha by
their branch of the family, the principality of Saalfeld was ceded to the Saxe-Meiningen
branch.
2 Ovid : Fasti 5, 490.
12 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Prince Leopold proved what a happy choice she had made
of a consort to share her prospective grandeur. When in
1831 he was called to the throne of the newly-founded
Kingdom of Belgium, he made for himself a remarkable
position among the rulers of Europe as a sagacious counsellor
in international affairs. He remained ever faithful to the
memory of the young bride who had first recognised his
qualities, and after her he called his daughter, born of his
marriage with the Princess Louise d' Orleans. It was as
though some dire fatality were attached to the cherished
name. For the Princess Charlotte of Belgium still lingers
in the twentieth century, a pathetic memorial of a royal
romance which moved the hearts of our great-grand-
parents. Married to the Archduke Maximilian, whom
the ambition of Napoleon III. made Emperor of Mexico,
anxiety for her hapless husband's situation deprived her
of reason even before he fell on the execution ground at
Queretaro.
It has been worth while to dwell for a moment on the
disappearance of the Princess Charlotte, for her death on
November 6, 1817, produced a state of things full of
menace to the peaceful settlement of the Crown which had
followed the Revolution of 1688. It was not merely the
tragic end of a beloved young princess, on whom the hopes
of the nation were centred, which provoked public con-
sternation ; nor was it even the taking of her place in the
succession to the Crown by her middle-aged uncles, who
inspired dissimilar feelings. It was because with her death
the progeny of George III., in the second generation, came
to an end. Although the aged king had had fifteen sons
and daughters, of whom twelve were alive at the close of
1817, he had not a single grandchild. That phenomenal
THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY 13
failure of direct heirs might be remedied by the marriage
of those of the royal dukes who were free to contract
matrimony. But marriages are often barren, and if the
issue of George III. failed in the second generation, the
next series of heirs to the throne under the Act of Settle-
ment included persons who were not only strangers to our
land, but who were the incarnation of the French Revolu-
tion and of hostility to England. It is a fact, very little
known, that two years after Napoleon arrived at Saint
Helena, a Bonaparte, his infant nephew, was within
measurable distance of becoming heir-presumptive to the
British crown.1
1 At the death of the Princess Charlotte there were eighty-seven persons in the succession to
the Crown of England, as descendants of the Electress Sophia, under the Act of Settlement
(12 and 13 Will. III. c. 2). Of them the three persons nearest the throne, being married and
having issue, were the King of Wurtemburg, his brother Paul and his sister Catherine
Frederica, wife of Jerome Bonaparte, they being grandchildren of Augusta, elder daughter of
Frederick, Prince of Wales. The first twelve of the eighty-seven heirs were the children of
George III., all of whom were then childless. After them came the two children of William
Henry, Duke of Gloucester, younger son of Frederick, Prince of Wales, neither of whom ever
had issue. Next came the descendants of Augusta, Duchess of Brunswick, the above-
mentioned daughter of Frederick. Of these the first in succession were her two young
grandsons, the children of "Brunswick's fated chieftain" of Childe Harold: then came her
younger son, who was childless, and then the Wurtemburg family, including Princess
Catherine Frederica ( Bonaparte), who married in 1807 Jerome, sometime King of Westphalia,
Napoleon's youngest brother, but who remained a staunch Protestant. In the words of her
daughter, who is still alive, "Entre le trdne d'Espagne et sa religion ma mere choisit la
derniere." She was therefore not disqualified by religion under the Act of Settlement. Their
infant son, who might thus have become heir-presumptive to the British crown, was born in
1814 and died in 1847. By this excellent princess, who bore her honours and misfortunes
with equal grace, Jerome Bonaparte had later two other children. The elder, the venerable
Princess Mathilde, born in 1820 before the death of her uncle Napoleon, remains one of the
most interesting historical figures in the twentieth century, retaining her remarkable faculties
to such an extent that she wrote to me with her own hand a letter to furnish some of the
details on which this note is founded. The younger (1822-1891), known as Prince Napoleon
under the Second Empire, was the father of Prince Napoleon Victor, the present head of the
family. As friendly relations have existed for half a century between England and the house
of Bonaparte, in its prosperity and adversity, it is a fact, not without interest, that the chief of
that line should now be a blood relation of our reigning dynasty. The Wurtemburg family is
still next in succession to the British Crown after the heirs of George III. (who, however,
thanks to the progeny of Queen Victoria, have become an inexhaustible stock), as the Bruns-
I4 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
When the succession was secured to the issue of George
III. by the birth in rapid succession of heirs to the royal
dukes, other circumstances arose which again disquieted
the loyalty of the British people. It is needless here to
refer to the unhappy relations of George IV. and his con-
sort. All that need be said about the scandals associated
with the name of Queen Caroline is that even if the king
had possessed the virtues of Marcus Aurelius he would not
have been justified, in the modern state, in imitating that
stoic's philosophic condonation of the diversions of
Faustina. However that may be, his influence and
character were not of a nature to strengthen the attach-
ment of the people to the throne at a period when the anti-
monarchical principles of the French Revolution were again
running rife in Europe. The storm broke out in France
afresh in 1830, before George IV. had been dead a month.
The sounds of the Revolution of July, re-echoing across
the Channel, encouraged the discontented populace of
England, agitating for Reform, to seek the redress of its
just grievances by revolutionary means. The sailor-king,
William IV., who then succeeded, was, in comparison with
wicks became extinct, when the two sons of the Duke, who fell at Quatre Bras, died. The
younger, who succeeded his brother, when he was expelled from his duchy in 1830, lived until
1884. In connection with the possibility of a Bonaparte becoming heir presumptive to the
British Crown, it may be noted that the irregular wife of Jerome, whom he married in America
when a boy of barely nineteen, and whose marriage was annulled by the Emperor, was received
at the English Court, and at the ball given at Brighton for the Princess Charlotte's twenty-first
birthday, on January 7, 1817, " the beautiful Mrs Paterson, late Madame Jerome Bonaparte,"
danced in the royal quadrille. So acute was the alarm felt about the succession to the crown,
that, on the death of Princess Charlotte, actuarial calculations were made which presaged the
accession of foreigners to the throne in less than twenty-one years. These fears were allayed
by the birth, in 1819, of several grandchildren to George III. His sons, the Dukes of Clarence,
Kent, and Cambridge, all married in the summer of 1818, and all became fathers in the
following spring. The Duchess of Clarence's child did not survive its birth, and a second
daughter born the next year died in infancy. The Princess Victoria of Kent was born two
months after her cousin, Prince George of Cambridge, and three days before the only child of
the Duke of Cumberland, who had, however, married three years before his brothers.
THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY 15
his predecessor, beloved by his subjects.1 But he had no
children, and, although not an aged man, was unlikely to
live for a long term of years. If, therefore, at his death
the sceptre should fall into unpopular or maladroit hands,
it seemed not improbable that the revolutionary tendency,
once more encouraged by events in France, might develop
till it endangered the dynasty.
But the saviour of the monarchical idea in England was
already on the spot. A little maiden of eleven summers,
learning her lessons and playing her childish games, un-
conscious of her high destiny,2 under the shadow of the
menaced throne, was fated not only to make that idea a
deeply-rooted national sentiment, stronger than it had ever
been since the brief years of hopeful enthusiasm after the
Restoration of 1660, but also to establish it as a racial
creed, which in her lifetime was to consolidate a world-
wide empire of which the foundations were as yet barely
visible. Happily the Princess Victoria did not become
queen till she had attained her legal majority. Had
William IV. died before she came of age a regency would
have introduced elements into the government of the
country which might have complicated the relations of
the court and the nation. As it was, the spectacle of a
solitary young girl called to reign over a great kingdom at
the age of eighteen touched the hearts of the British people
1 A testimony to the popularity of William IV. is found in Tom Browns Schooldays,
where among the favourite ballads of the Rugby boys in the early days of his reign were two
in praise of " Billy our King." The Princess Lieven, three weeks after his accession, wrote,
"The mob adores him," and that agreeable busybody describes the king's enthusiasm for
everything British, to the point of dismissing the French cooks on the first day of his reign.
Letters of Dorothea, Princess Lieven, during her residence in London, 1812-1834, edited by
Lionel G. Robinson.
2 It was not until 1831 that Baroness Lehzen was permitted to let her august little pupil
know how near she was to the succession.
1 6 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
as they had rarely been moved before. To find an equally
pathetic figure in history, appealing to patriotic imagination
and emotion, we must go to Presburg a century before,
when another young queen inspired the magnates and
deputies of Hungary to unsheathe their swords and to cry :
" Moriamur pro rege nostro, Maria Theresa."
The young queen stood alone ; for excepting her cousin,
Prince George, who had just entered the army, and whom
we have all known as the veteran Duke of Cambridge, her
only associates were her elderly uncles and her middle-
aged ministers.1 Indeed, her situation was in some
respects more difficult than that of Maria Theresa of
Austria. For instead of being unanimously supported by
the magnates of the land, it was among the upper class, in
the first unprotected years of queenship, that she met with
the only serious hostility which marred her relations with
her subjects during her long reign. It is needless to dwell
on these episodes, all the more indefensible, as the class, of
which a certain section was wanting in deference to the
youthful sovereign, owed its security to her existence, which
saved the nation from anarchy. For had this young girl
not succeeded to the throne, or after her Accession had she
died before she became a mother, a catastrophe would have
occurred, the consequences of which an Englishman dares
not contemplate, though two generations have passed since
the danger was conjured.
1 The most juvenile member of the Cabinet was Lord Howick, Secretary at War, who, born
in 1802, survived, as Earl Grey, almost as long as his royal mistress, dying in October 1894.
"The queen was so alone," is an expression used by the Baroness Burdett-Coutts, a close
witness of the events of this period, who was born five years before Her Majesty, and was
almost the only Englishwoman moving in society in 1837-38 who lived till the coronation
of 1902. Although the venerable baroness remembers four coronations, and although
" Ingoldsby " has for ever associated her name with the coronation of Queen Victoria, it is
a curious fact that she was never present, within Westminster Abbey, at one of them.
THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY 17
The next heir to the throne was Ernest, Duke of Cum-
berland, who, on the death of his brother, William IV.,
became King of Hanover, by the operation of the Salic
Law. There is no need to analyse that prince's character,
which made him, of all the sons of George III., the least
fitted to be King of Great Britain and Ireland. The most
cursory glance at the prints and literature of the day shows
what an escape England had, and how well the English
people appreciated the peril. A popular woodcut of the
period, juxtaposing the scowling features of the heir pre-
sumptive and the bright pure face of the maiden queen,
who stood between him and the throne, had for its legend,
" Look here upon this picture and on this." Such mani-
festations denoted not merely the sentimental preference of
a hopeful people for a fresh young life full of promise to be
its central object, over a battered figure of forbidding
demeanour. There were graver reasons for dreading the
accession of the Duke of Cumberland. That prince was
a reactionary politician of arbitrary and unconciliatory dis-
position, in violent antagonism with every movement
favoured by the great majority of the inhabitants of the
British Isles.1 A London journal of the period, in the
number describing the coronation of the queen, made the
1 The best witness as to that Prince's attitude towards popular sentiment and opinion in
England is the King of Hanover himself. It is well known that he was identified with the
Orange party to such an extent that it was believed that an Orange plot was organised to
dethrone the young queen and to proclaim him king. But his extreme ideas and his personal
character alienated the sympathies even of his partisans in the United Kingdom. In a letter to
Croker, of November 3Oth, 1838, he complains of " the determined neglect of my old political
friends, who have cast me off." In the same letter he expounds very openly his political creed :
" The first shock we met was in 1828, the repeal of the Corporation and Test Act ; this led to
the second in the following year, the Catholic Emancipation ; and that to our ruin, the Reform
Bill." It should be said to the credit of the Duke of Cumberland that he possessed one
virtue— that of physical courage. When he was the most unpopular figure in London, he
used to ride out unattended, disdaining the insults and menaces which greeted him in the
streets.
1 8 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
following reflections on the contingency of his succession.
In an article written on the eve of the ceremony, and
prompted by " the present universal outburst of loyalty, so
very unlike anything evinced upon former occasions," after
declaring that "we know of no republicans in this
country," the writer proceeded : " Let those who think
that it is a regard for the institution, and not for the person
of the sovereign, that ought to inspire our loyalty, ask them-
selves what would be their sentiments at the present moment
if it were for King Ernest, not Queen Victoria, that the
Abbey was preparing ? The change, however hateful, might
occur to-morrow. There is but a single plank between us
and shipwreck." 1
Even if the next heir to the crown had not been a
person of the character of the King of Hanover, but an
enlightened and constitutional prince, as was his next
brother, the Duke of Sussex, the Queen's favourite uncle,
even then her disappearance would have been a misfortune
the extent of which only we who have seen the end of
her long reign can calculate. Though the wisdom of
ministers and the good sense of the British people had pre-
served the land from violent revolution, without the life and
reign of Queen Victoria the history, not only of England,
but of Europe and of civilisation, would have taken a
different course. Her throne became a landmark to
Europe, to display to other nations the advantage of the
1 Weekly Chronicle, July i, 1838. — The sentiment here expressed is similar to that of Dr
Paley, quoted in a previous footnote. Cf. also W. Bagehot, Biographical Studies : " The
king is to be loved ; but this theory requires for a real efficiency that the throne be filled by
such a person as can be loved. In those times (Regency and reign of George IV.) it was
otherwise. . . . There was no loyalty on which suffering workers or an angry middle class
could repose. All through the realm there was a miscellaneous agitation, a vague and
wandering discontent." It was the achievement of Queen Victoria to make the institution of
royalty revered and prized, as well as the person of the sovereign.
THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY 19
monarchical system. Her crown became the emblem of the
British race, to encourage its expansion over the face of
the globe, and to retain the allegiance of emigrant settlers
to the island-kingdom of their origin. It is to be noted
that even among those whose loyal hopes were raised to
the highest pitch by the accession of the young queen,
none had any idea of the particular benefits which would
result from her reign in connection with the development of
the colonies held in her name. None could predict the
long duration of that reign. Still less was it possible to
foresee the growth of an empire beyond the seas, of which
the closest bond with the mother-country would be a cult
for the symbols of royalty worn by a revered sovereign.
The memoirs and correspondence of the day, the reminis-
cences of the few survivors of 1838, all prove that no one
dreamed of the significance which the Imperial Crown,1 as
it was even then called, would assume before it was laid
aside by Queen Victoria.
The frail "single plank" which saved England from
shipwreck was soon to be strengthened. The marriage of
Queen Victoria in 1840 with her cousin Prince Albert of
Saxe-Coburg and Gotha was one of the happiest events
in English history. In modern times there were only
two royal alliances to be compared with it in beneficent
results to the people of England. One was the marriage
of Henry Tudor with Elizabeth of York, which put an end
to the Wars of the Roses, and producing in the second
generation Queen Elizabeth, enabled the nation to enjoy to
the full the splendours of the last stage of the Renaissance.
The other was the union of Mary Stuart with her cousin,
William of Orange, which, though childless, turned the Re-
1 See book iv. chapter 6.
20 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
volution of 1688 into a benefit, and protected England from
the ills which fell upon France a century later. The very
year of the Queen's marriage the fears of the people were
allayed by the birth of the Princess Royal, whose noble and
well-tried life scarcely survived her mother's — the first of the
admirable daughters of the Queen whom she brought up
to be a pattern to English womanhood. But it was on
November 9, 1841, that the succession was doubly assured,
in the manner most desired by the people of England, when
the birth of a future king was hailed with universal joy.
Seven other children completed the royal family, three of
whom the Queen had the sorrow to lose in her lifetime.
Two of them, a daughter who died a devoted victim to
maternal love, and the second son, a gallant sailor, were
called to fill exalted places in foreign lands. But the
youngest son, the Duke of Albany, whose fragile health
gave him leisure to admit to the privilege of quiet intimacy
a few of his young contemporaries, had no other ambition
than to devote his high gifts to fostering the growth of the
imperial idea, and his last expressed wish, before he was
prematurely cut off, was that he might be sent to administer
a distant province of his mother's empire. The notable
qualities of Queen Victoria's children are justly ascribed to
the training and example of their parents and to hereditary
force, derived from the remarkable family of Saxe-Coburg
and Gotha, from which they are chiefly sprung. But one
ought not to forget that the Queen had a father, as well as
a mother and a husband. The Duke of Kent, whose name
of Edward is now again added to our list of kings, was an
honest prince, who, to his martial and patriotic instincts,
added a profound love of liberty which, alone of his
brothers, the Duke of Sussex shared. The shadowy form
THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY 21
of this silent father of our kings, when we see his best
virtues reproduced in his descendants, ought not to be
denied a salute of recognition.1
These considerations on the offspring of Queen Victoria
are not a digression from the argument which was suggested
at the outset by the antithesis of the two dates, in 1792 and
in 1902, marking respectively the decadence of the old
monarchical idea on the continent and the consecration of
the new imperial idea in England. For the maternity of
the Queen was a strong factor in the popularity restored to
the royal office, which, protecting the British crown when
the final recrudescence of the French Revolution shook
every dynasty in Europe, enabled it to be worn with in-
creasing lustre for another half century and then to be
handed on aggrandised to its next custodian. The first
years of the Queen's married life were not a period of
contented prosperity in the land. The distress, aggravated
by the new economic conditions which railways had intro-
duced, and the agitation which attended the remediary
repeal of the Corn Laws, put the popularity of the royal
family to the test. But the nation was proud of the young
queen who had become a mother five times in five years
and a half.2 So when the French Revolution of 1848 broke
out, on the eve of the birth of her sixth child, the palace
was the securest corner of the British realm.
The revolution, which sent Louis Philippe an exile to
seek the hospitality of the Queen of England, was a graver
movement than the Revolution of July, which had put
1 At a moment when the name of Edward is associated with the union of the colonies to the
mother-country, it is of interest to note that the memory of Edward, Duke of Kent, is still
popular in British North America, where Prince Edward's Island was named after him.
2 From the birth of the Princess Royal, November 21, 1840, to the birth of the Princess
Helena, May 25, 1846.
22 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
him on the throne of France. The latter, in 1830, when
Bourbon displaced Bourbon, was deemed by French
theorists to be modelled on the English Revolution of
1688. In 1848 no far-fetched precedent from England was
invoked. The legend of the French Revolution, dis-
credited in our day, was still an active force in France and
in Europe. Men who had taken part in it, including the
ex-Jacobin King of the French, were still in public life.
Hence Lamartine's lyrical History of the Girondins, idealis-
ing the violent phases of the great Revolution, was able to
rouse an anti-monarchical tempest in France. As that
country was in a state of discontent, and was, moreover, of
greater influence in Europe than at present, the revolu-
tionary breeze freshened into a tornado and devastated the
entire continent. Never was such a commotion seen, from
the Danube to the Tagus, from the y£gean to the Baltic.
Frederick- William of Prussia was besieged in his palace by
the populace of Berlin till he swore over the corpses of
fallen insurgents to grant liberties to his subjects. Metter-
nich, having seen 1792, recognised the deluge and gave the
example of flight to his master, Ferdinand of Austria, who
abdicated, leaving Windischgraetz and Radetsky to calm
the populations of the empire with the cannon and the cord.
The Sicilian insurrection and the days of Milan were adding
stress to the storm at the two ends of the Italian peninsula,
when Garibaldi landed from South America and joined the
Pope to the list of fugitive sovereigns. Athens and Prague,
Lisbon and Madrid were swept by the flames kindled in
Paris. Great Britain alone escaped. A shower of rain
sufficed to scatter the Chartist legions marching on West-
minster, and Special-Constable Louis Bonaparte, on the eve
of fishing up his uncle's crown from the waters of revolu-
THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY 23
tion, observed that the doctrines of 1792, which had
founded the fortune of his family, were of no account in
England.
With an unpopular monarch on the throne, or even one
who was an object of public indifference, the Chartist rising
would not have ended with the comedy of Kennington
Common. Yet in a land which had just passed through
a decade of economic readjustment and its consequent
social disquiet, where Kossuth, the republican chief of the
Hungarian Revolution, was the hero of the hour, and
Haynau, who represented law and order in that struggle,
was publicly outraged, the throne remained the most stable
institution. If an appeal had to be made to the passions of
the populace the prerogatives of the crown were invoked ;
and thus the curious agitation which arose in 185 1, when the
Roman hierarchy, lately established in England, assumed
English territorial titles, was popularised by the cry that
the royal supremacy was threatened by a foreign power.
Indeed, the period produced a sort of apotheosis of the
royal family. The great Exhibition in Hyde Park, pro-
jected by the genius of the Prince Consort, was opened by
the Queen with such imposing ceremonial that a people,
usually unimaginative, thought it marked a new era of
peace and prosperity under the benign rule of a beloved
sovereign. "There is no other topic of interest or im-
portance," said an ordinarily prosaic journal ; " the
revolutions incipient or half-extinguished in Germany,
Italy and France awake no echoes in the popular mind.
Who shall say, if we had had a railway system pervading
Europe in 1780, and steamships plying between New York
and Liverpool, whether Napoleon Bonaparte might not
have become a great sculptor or a great cotton-spinner
24 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
in 1810, whether Wellington might not thirty years ago
have been a philosopher more genial than Bentham ? " l
Such was the loyal lyrism inspired by the spectacle of the
Queen, surrounded by her family, inaugurating an inter-
national show, while Louis Napoleon was preparing the
coup d'ttat as a prelude to inviting England to join with
him in the Crimean War.
The revolutions on the continent, and the great source
from which they sprang, were not forgotten, but they were
mentioned only to mark the happy contrast between the
annals of England and that of foreign countries. Mr
Bright, taking 1790 as a starting-point of international
reform, compared the peaceful progress, which had pursued
its course in England in the subsequent sixty years, with
that effected in foreign lands by the change of constitutions
and by sanguinary revolutions.2 Mr Bright was not at
that period recognised as a Conservative. He was some-
times called "the tribune of the plebs." If the inaccurate
application of that title was in some degree justified by his
attacks upon the " patricians," as the Radicals of that day
called the landed interest, his eloquence, which gave him
his influence over the democracy, often found a felicitous
phrase to stir the multitude to a sense of loyalty. A few
years later, when his opposition to the Crimean War had
offended the British public, which had suddenly awoke
with a pugnacious snap after its peace-making dream, he
prefaced an ardent assault on the ruling classes by a noble
tribute to the wearer of the crown : — " We are prepared to
say that if the throne of England be filled with so much
dignity and so much purity as we have known it in our
1 Illustrated London Arrws, May 3, 1851.
2 Meeting of Registration Committees of S. Lancashire, January 23, 1851.
THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY 25
time, we hope that the venerable monarchy may be
perpetual." l
This happy tendency of leaders of the Extreme Left, as
they would be called in continental assemblies, to separate
the sovereign from the policy of their political opponents has
been followed by the association in England of a strong
growth of monarchical sentiment with an equally strong
development of ideas which abroad are considered anti-
monarchical. It is one of the most interesting phenomena
of the reign of Queen Victoria, and it leads to a brief con-
sideration of the influence which the French Revolution
continued to have in Europe in the last half of the
nineteenth century.
The time is past for treating the French Revolution as a
unique turning-point in the history of the world, com-
parable with the foundation of Christianity or the Renais-
sance. It is taking its historical place with other national
commotions of which the effects were felt beyond the
frontiers of their origin. A century hence it will be re-
garded as an epoch less important in the progress of
mankind than those in which steam and electricity were
applied to means of communication. But whatever view
we take of its importance — whether we follow Mr Disraeli,
who, formulating the opinion of his age in his own florid
language, said that the only two events which mattered in
the world's history were the Siege of Troy and the French
Revolution,2 or whether we class it merely with the revolu-
1 Free Trade Hall, Manchester, December 10, 1858.
2 I am unable to verify this saying attributed to Disraeli. Mr W. Sichel, the biographer
of Bolingbroke, who has a peculiar knowledge of the writings of Disraeli, tells me that the
only similar passage to be found in his published works is in the preface to the Revolutionary
Epic, where he asks, " Is the Revolution in France a less important event than the Siege of
Troy ? " The words, as I have quoted them, may possibly have been a conversational boutade,
imparted to me by oral tradition.
26 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
tions of Athens and of Florence — one thing is certain
about it, it was an essentially individualistic movement.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man is a document as
individualistic as is the Decalogue. Nevertheless, modern
socialism l is in a sense an emanation of the French Revolu-
tion, as in its name it was first popularised in Europe.
Fourier and Saint Simon and Robert Owen in their
respective spheres had failed to do this. But the Revolu-
tion of 1848 assumed a socialistic character, and this was
mainly due to the influence of Louis Blanc, a fervid
apostle of the French Revolution. His Organisation of
Labour, which advocated the nationalisation of factories
and of the newly laid railways, was soon followed by his
History of the Revolution, which read into that movement
communistic doctrines, repudiated equally by the philo-
sophers of 1789 and the Terrorists of 1793. It was the
fear of this socialism, preached by the leaders of 1848,
which threw France into the arms of Louis Napoleon,
whose rule interrupted the propaganda in that country.
The socialists, therefore, who were all ardent repub-
licans, had to remove the seat of their operations from
France to other lands, England being the favourite asylum
for political exiles. In Germany, Marx, who had come to
Paris during the Revolution of 1848, had a wide influence.
He too took refuge in London, where, in 1864, he founded
the International, to carry out his idea of the union of the
proletariats of all countries. This was not unconnected
with the growth of a republican movement in England,
1 The term socialism is here used in its modern applied sense. Sodalisme, when that
term was first introduced into the French language, signified merely a system which sub-
ordinated political reform to social reform. Thus communism, saint-simonism, fourieristn
were on that account ranked as socialistic systems, and not because of the collectivism, to
use a more recent term, found in their doctrines.
THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY 27
which before it died out was supported by certain politicians
of wealth and high intelligence, whose subsequent paths
have far diverged, but who in their dissevered maturity
profess one idea in common — the consolidation of the
British Empire under the hereditary crown.
One reason why the republican movement did not spread
in England under the influence of revolutionary missionaries
from the continent is that the British working-man, like
the majority of his compatriots, cares little for abstract
doctrine. He is not more selfish or materialistic, but only
more practical than the French proletarian, who occupies
the time of trade-union congresses by chanting the Carmag-
nole, cursing the bourgeois and talking about fraternity.
He has daily needs which he wishes to satisfy rather than
dim ideals which he aspires to realise. The word republic
has no magic sound for him. He knows little of the
speculative conception according to which republic and
democracy are synonymous terms. At the same time if
the throne of England had not been respected during
the years in which the democracy has obtained political
power, its existence might have been held responsible for
periodical bad times. It would have been continually in
unequal conflict with a discontented people which would
have looked for an example, not across the Channel to the
French Republic, which has no attraction for the English
working-classes, but across the Atlantic to the American
Republic, where they know that well-being is generally
diffused among all sections of the community.
But the English monarchy has continued in the path
which called forth the praises of Mr Bright. Hence
it has secured the suffrages of a democracy which in its
social principles has gone far beyond the extremest views
28 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
countenanced by that so-called democrat. The opening
years of the twentieth century are as remarkable for the
growth of socialism in England as for the unprecedented
loyalty of the population. The socialistic experiments,
lightly enterprised by the municipalities of the capital and
of other great cities, alarm the economist but cause no
fear to the loyal. The Trades Union Congress may ban
His Majesty's ministers and scorn His Majesty's opposi-
tion ; but its members, who represent hundreds of thousands
of working men, do not deny a tribute of respect to their
newly-crowned sovereign who is outside and above all
parties in the state.1
Moreover, the crown is the link which binds to the
mother-country not only subject peoples subdued by con-
quest, but advanced democracies of English speech and
origin, in which the diffusion of well-being is as real as in
the United States, and the enjoyment of liberty is far
beyond that of the citizens of the French Republic. These
free colonies, proud to be members of the mightiest empire
ever seen, have imparted their pride to the democracy at
home with which they are in constant relation. Identity of
race and of language would not have sufficed to bind the
empire. For the English tongue is spoken throughout
the American Union, which also contains millions of
citizens of recent British origin ; while, the independent
white population of our colonies is not homogeneous, and
we have in them, notably in Canada, loyal fellow-subjects
who are not of our race or language.
If the influence of the French Revolution at its origin in
the eighteenth century, or in either of its later phases in
1 Trades Union Congress, September 1902. Parliamentary Committee's Report,
THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY 29
the nineteenth, had induced the overthrow of the British
monarchy and the edification of a republic in its place, the
tenacious and enterprising genius of our race might still
have made it the foremost to utilise the newly-invented
means of rapid communication in peopling and developing
the lands beyond the sea where now flies the flag of
England. But that British flag without the crown would
not have sufficed to retain the allegiance of those distant
settlements to the mother-country. In the period which is
removing the world's centre of gravity from Europe, it
would have become a glorious relic instead of an ensign
of empire.
When Queen Victoria completed the fiftieth year of her
reign, foreign spectators of the first Jubilee were impressed
by the escort of princes, sent by every court of Europe, to
do homage to her who more than any other sovereign of
her century had brought honour on the regal office. But
when ten years later the same observers returned they
witnessed a different spectacle. In the royal procession
again were seen the sumptuous trappings of the representa-
tives of monarchies, some of which in the lifetime of the
Queen had belonged to the Holy Alliance for the repression
of popular liberties, in dread of the influence of the French
Revolution ; others had come into being during her reign,
the outcome of the revolutionary movements initiated in
France. But whatever the history of their dynasties, the
princely envoys of Europe were no longer the central
figures of the pageant. All eyes were turned to the aged
sovereign's bodyguard, formed of her subjects from beyond
the seas. Among them the gold and the jewels of her
faithful Indians did not distract the gaze from the modest
uniforms of the colonial cavalry, which soon, in its outfit
3o THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
as in its science, was to set a pattern to the valiant
standing army of the Queen. It was then, perhaps, that
the imperial idea, which had long been growing in the
nation, first touched the imagination of the populace, as it
cheered the citizen soldiery of the young colonies guarding
the venerable mother of all the Britains. So it was, when,
in the first hours of the new century, she was borne to rest
by the side of the consort who had supported her in the
critical years of her reign, when monarchical sentiment was
but feebly rooted in the hearts of the people, she left an un-
paralleled heritage to her illustrious son. It was not merely
dominion over a world-wide empire that King Edward in-
herited. He likewise inherited devotion to his kingly office
rendered by a number of democracies, within which social
and political doctrines were put into practice, so advanced
that they would have staggered the wildest theorists of the
French Revolution who beheaded first their sovereign and
then one another, who waged war on the ancient monarchies
of Europe to propagate their relatively mild principles.
The basis of their theory was that the institution of heredi-
tary monarchy was incompatible with human progress.
The basis of the imperial idea, which now unites the
British peoples, is that the hereditary monarchy is the sole
instrument capable of consolidating the most progressive
communities ever established on the world's surface.
There may be spots of discontent within the King's
domains apt to check our exultation. There may be
insoluble problems in the eternal struggle between rich
and poor, developed in such acute form in the metropolis
of the empire as to make men wonder how a body cor-
porate can remain healthy when tainted at its centre. Yet
the dangers arising from the one and the other source do
THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH LOYALTY 31
not menace the throne. In the two generations succeeding
the French Revolution they might have led to anti-
monarchical agitation. But of the hundred and ten years
which stand between the ending of the ancient regime and
the Coronation of King Edward VII., nearly sixty-four
were filled by a reign which set at naught the dreams of
philosophers. And so it is that the coincidence of the
dates, August 9, 1792, and August 9, 1902, is instructive
to ponder.
BOOK II
THE CORONATIONS AND SIMILAR CEREMONIES
ON THE EUROPEAN CONTINENT IN THE
NINETEENTH CENTURY
CHAPTER I
CORONATIONS ON THE EUROPEAN CONTINENT IN THE
XIX CENTURY
IN the nineteenth century, more than three-fifths of
which was covered by the reign and more than four-
fifths by the life of Queen Victoria, over a hundred1
monarchs ascended the different thrones of Europe.
The territories over which those personages were called
to rule were dissimilar in size and in importance. The
powers with which they were invested ranged from absolute
autocracy to statutory or treaty-protected monarchy more
limited than that of England. The circumstances under
which they assumed different degrees of sovereign authority
were most varied. In addition to the lawful inheritors of
ancient crowns, some were the founders of dynasties, — like
Napoleon, sprung from lowly origin, whose empire dis-
appeared, though his constructive work survived ; or like
1 The number seems to be one hundred and two, counting four popes who were territorial
sovereigns ; but not counting the princes regnant of the German Federation who have not
kingly titles, nor sovereign and semi-sovereign princes like those of Montenegro, Bulgaria,
Liechtenstein and Monaco, who are in the same case, nor the titularies of the now extinct
duchies of Tuscany, Parma, Modena, etc. The number would have been greater had not the
popes of the nineteenth century been singularly few. Including Leo XIII., who was never a
territorial sovereign, only five were elected in the nineteenth century — Pius VII. having
succeeded in the last days of the eighteenth. In no other century since the first, either before
or after the assumption by the Papacy of temporal power, were there ever less than double
that number. In the tenth century as many as twenty-four pontiffs ascended the throne
of Peter, and the average reign of a pope since the foundation of the Papacy has been seven
years.
35
36 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Victor Emmanuel, a prince of illustrious line, whose king-
dom of Italy, which he created, was peacefully inherited by
two generations of his progeny before the century ended.
Some, including both those just mentioned, were raised to
thrones as the result of wars and of revolutions, or were
placed on them by the will of conquerors, the vote of
congresses or the acclamation of peoples. Some of these
were by birth heirs apparent or presumptive to the crowns
which they thus prematurely obtained, as was Francis
Joseph of Austria, made emperor by the Revolution of
1 848 ; or were princes of royal lineage who might never
have reigned but for popular uprising, as was Louis
Philippe, first and last king of the French. Others again
of these monarchs of irregular succession were of race alien
to the nations they were set over, of whom some remained
only for a brief season on their foreign thrones, like
Joachim Murat at Naples or Amadeus of Savoy at
Madrid, while others founded stable dynasties in the lands
of their adoption, as did Bernadotte in Sweden and
Leopold of Saxe-Coburg in Belgium.
But of all the occupants of European thrones at the
dawn of the twentieth century, whatever the origin of their
sovereignty, only two were the direct successors of monarchs
reigning at the commencement of the nineteenth century,
who had handed down from that time, by uninterrupted
hereditary devolution, their regal attributes unchanged in
constitutional character. The King of England and the
Tsar of Russia, the rulers of the two greatest empires in
the world, were alone in that case.
The Kings of Prussia, having survived the Revolution of
1848, which modified their prerogatives, became in 1871,
after the conquest of France, German Emperors. The
EUROPEAN CORONATIONS IN THE XIX CENTURY 37
last Emperor of Germany, for the converse reason of
having been conquered by France, had early in the century
assumed the more modest style of Emperor of Austria.
The sole rivals in antiquity to the heirs of the Holy Roman
Empire, the Popes, ceased to be territorial sovereigns, just
before the title of emperor was revived in Germany.
Their states were merged in the new kingdom of Italy,
united by a scion of a younger branch of the ancient family
of Savoy, who had climbed, by way of the thrones of
Piedmont and Sardinia, to a place in the hierarchy of the
great powers. The Spanish Bourbons began and ended
the century on the throne of Spain, but in the interval had
once been decoyed and once expelled from that country to
make way for two foreign sovereigns and one republic.
France began and ended the century without a monarchy,
but in the interval enjoyed nine different regimes. The
house of Holstein-Gottorp disappeared from Sweden ; but
the house of Orange, more fortunate, was advanced to
kingly rank by the Congress of Vienna, and was reinstated
in the Netherlands, which had entered the century a
dependency of France. The dynasty which has remained
the most ancient in Europe is not European. The
Othmans, who still reign at the Golden Horn, were
monarchs when the Plantagenets were Kings of England
and the Capets Kings of France, a hundred and fifty years
before the conquest of Constantinople ; but the war with
Greece in 1828 and the war with Russia in 1877 left the
Sultans with only a strip of the European territory over
which they ruled at the beginning of the century.
The ceremonies attending the formal assumption of
sovereign power by these monarchs have been of great
variety ; but few of them, whether coronations or pro-
38 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
clamations, have had more than local significance. If, for
example, the parallel stability and might of the British and
Russian Empires suggests a comparison of the solemnities
observed in the crownings of their respective monarchs,
there at once arises the difficulty of selecting the Tsar, of
the nineteenth century, whose coronation was a signal
historical event, marking a distinct epoch. The contrast
between the British and the Russian Empires is always
interesting, the one enclosed as it were in a ring fence,
though capable of expansion and stretching across two
quarters of the globe, the other scattered in isolated
portions all over the world. The coronation of a Tsar,
moreover, appeals to Englishmen of our age more than
similar ceremonials elsewhere, because his dominion, like
that of the King of England, extends over many races.
Pregnant contrast suggests itself between the represen-
tatives of the distant subjects of the British monarch who
have to cross the sea to pay him homage, and the crowd
composed of Lithuanians and Finns, Armenians, Georgians
and Mingrelians, Tartars, Kalmuks and Turcomans, and
of other peoples, which repair to Moscow overland
from every point of the Russian Empire. Again it is
interesting to note how widely different are the rites
performed at Moscow and at Westminster, indicating the
distance which lies between the attributes of our con-
stitutional king and those of the autocrat of Russia. The
latter is crowned not at Saint Petersburg, the official
capital and seat of government, but at the ancient centre of
national sentiment and religion. The crowds, which await
him there, assemble not as loyal and joyful sightseers at a
fine pageant, but as devotees taking part in a sacred rite,
of which an integral part is the entry of the emperor into
EUROPEAN CORONATIONS IN THE XIX CENTURY 39
his holy city five days before the coronation. Not in a vast
minster, crowded, from roof to pavement, with thousands
of the notables of the land, does the Tsar assume the
crown, nor does he, humbly kneeling, accept the communion
at the hands of the Church's ministers. The scene of
his coronation is the chapel of the Assumption within the
Kremlin, which can contain only a few hundred spectators,
and there the autocrat himself invokes aloud the divine
authority as the source of his mystical absolutism, and
entering the sanctuary takes the elements as a priest.
In a general way such comparisons might be instructive.
But it is impossible to take the coronation of any one of the
five Tsars who succeeded one another after the murder
of Paul, the pitiful son of the great Catherine, in 1801,
and to draw any special lesson from the circumstances
attending the ceremony. The coronation of Alexander I.
was marked by a weird feature, if it be true that he
marched to it preceded by the assassins of his grandfather,
surrounded by the assassins of his father, and followed by
his own.1 But the reign was not remarkable of this
doctrinaire, who, brought up in the philosophy of the
French Revolution, took delight in inflicting constitu-
tional government on France, in 1814, without having
much success with similar experiments in his own domain.
His brother, Nicholas I., at whose coronation England was
represented by Wellington, was a powerful and successful
despot, until the Crimean War broke his heart. The son
of Nicholas, Alexander II., conceived a noble task in
proposing the commutation of servile tenures, and died,
1 The anecdote was one of Talleyrand's : " L'empereur marchait pre'ce'de' des assassins de
son grandpere (Pierre III.), entoure' de ceux de son pere (Paul I.) et suivi par les siens." The
end of Alexander I. , in 1825, was surrounded with great mystery.
40 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
nevertheless, the death of a tyrant, like his grandfather,
and also like many a benevolent monarch, such as
Henry IV. of France. Alexander III., like his son and
successor, Nicholas II., brought by his marriage the courts
of Russia and of England into close intimacy, with bene-
ficent result to the peace of the world ; but the coronations
of those excellent princes, as those of their predecessors,
marked no particular epochs in the history of Europe or of
civilisation.
If the description of picturesque ceremonial were the aim
of this work, it would be tempting to dwell upon the
coronation, as King of Hungary, of Francis Joseph of
Austria, whose life since that event has perhaps been the
most valuable on the European continent. He had become
emperor a youth of eighteen ; but not till he had doubled
that age did he come to the capital of Hungary to be
crowned as Apostolic King. He had succeeded to an
empire shaken with rebellion, and before he had pacified it
he saw his dominions diminished by two adverse wars.
Then when Solferino had been succeeded by Sadowa, the
stricken monarch applied his courage and sagacity to the
reconstruction of his empire, and arranged with Deak the
compromise which gave the Hungarians the rights for
which they had fought in 1848. Thus he assumed the
iron-crown of Saint Stephen as the symbol of the autonomy
of Hungary, over which hitherto he had reigned pro-
visionally. At Budapesth it was placed on his head,
and there, mounted on a white charger shod with gold,
attended by the magnates in their sumptuous Magyar
attire, he drew his sword, and, amid a scene of mediaeval
splendour, pointing it north, south, east and west, he swore
to defend the kingdom against one and all, and to maintain
EUROPEAN CORONATIONS IN THE XIX CENTURY 41
its ancient constitution. Francis Joseph on that day of
June 1867 inaugurated a period of peace in his own
dominions, which, thanks to the duration of his own life,
has been preserved, to the great benefit of Europe. For
his disappearance would have loosened the bonds with
which he had attached the heterogeneous peoples com-
posing the Dual Monarchy, and this would have been the
signal for that European conflagration which all the powers
anticipate with dread.
There were, however, in the nineteenth century three
ceremonies of this kind, which are definite landmarks in the
annals of civilised government, and, though unequal in
importance, may with advantage be compared with the
Coronation of King Edward VII.
The three which so stand out, amid the hundred
pageants, stately and simple, associated with the assumption
of regal or imperial rank by European potentates in the
last century, are the coronation of Napoleon Bonaparte as
Emperor of the French at Paris in 1804, tne coronation
of Queen Victoria at Westminster in 1838, and the
proclamation of William of Prussia as German Emperor
at Versailles in 1871. The coronation of Napoleon was
the apotheosis of the French Revolution, and marked
the commencement of the new social and political order
of things in continental Europe. The coronation of Queen
Victoria was the inauguration of the period of scientific
inventions, which, first emanating from England, were
destined to put into the shade the boasted results of the
French Revolution, by changing the face of the world
and the conditions of human society : it also signalised
the beginning of a new era in the history of the British
race, leading to the development and consolidation of the
42 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
British Empire. The proclamation of the Emperor William,
when the conquest of France was utilised to give thus a
semblance of completion to the edifice of German unity,
was less important than the other two ceremonials.1 But
the so-called2 unification of Germany, finally effected by
means of the abasement and mutilation of France, modified
the balance of power in the Old World, diminished the
influence of France in Europe, and deprived Paris of its
position as the political and intellectual capital of the
continent without, however, transferring that primacy to
Berlin. It also caused a development of industrial enter-
prise in the new empire which enabled Germany to
menace the commercial supremacy of Great Britain, and
made it ambitious of becoming a rival colonising power
instead of, as heretofore, a nursery for settlers in alien
possessions.
These three solemnities, imposing in their significance,
stand at intervals of just a generation apart in the nineteenth
century. The last of them was followed, at an equal in-
terval, in the early days of a new century, by a coronation
1 If it were within our purpose to refer to analogous ceremonies in nations which have their
seats of central government outside Europe, the inauguration of Abraham Lincoln as Presi-
dent of the United States in 1861, and the revival of the Japanese Empire in the person of the
Mikado Mutsuhito in 1868 might be mentioned as epoch-making events in the history of the
world. If the Federal States of America, under a weak President, had failed to maintain the
Union, in the War of Secession, and if the Japanese reformers had not succeeded in over-
throwing the Tycoon and the Daimios and in restoring the ancient dynasty, the world would
have been less "progressive," but more picturesque in the twentieth century — for then the
Americanising of Europe and the occidentalising of Japan would not have threatened it with
economic and social changes, the extent of which cannot be grasped.
2 There are about thirteen and a half million Germans in Europe who do not inhabit the
German Empire, including more than nine million Austrians and more than two million Swiss.
On the other hand, of the fifty-six and a quarter million inhabitants of the German Empire,
three and a quarter millions are non-Germanic. Thus, about 20 per cent, of the German
population of Europe are not subjects of the German Empire. The foregoing calculation is
based on language, not on race. The proportion of the Europeans of Teutonic origin, in-
habiting the German Empire, is smaller, as a large proportion of the so-called Germans,
notably in Silesia and in other parts of Prussia, are Germanised Slavs.
EUROPEAN CORONATIONS IN THE XIX CENTURY 43
which, perhaps, in the future, will be accounted of greater
historical importance than any of them. For the crowning
of King Edward not only marked the maintenance of an
immemorial tradition, which has been handed down with
archaic splendour of rite and circumstance to be the envy
of nations cut adrift from their past. It was also the solemn
recognition of the British Empire, as developed during the
reign of Queen Victoria. It was the consecration of the
imperial idea, which the latter period of her reign had
inspired in the hearts of her people.
Before approaching the august ceremonial of 1902, it will
be instructive to note some of the features characterising
the three similar events which stand out in the history of
the nineteenth century. As there is such intimate connec-
tion between the coronation of Queen Victoria and that of
her illustrious successor, departing from chronological order,
it will be better to leave our consideration of it until we
have dealt with the two other famous spectacles which
signalised historical turning-points in the annals of Europe.
No apology is needed for referring to them in these pages.
There is no better way of arriving at a clear understanding
of the significance of our own great national celebrations
than by observing some of the points of difference which
distinguish them from the solemnities which marked the
zenith of power or prestige attained, in the nineteenth cen-
tury, by the two leading nations of the continent.
CHAPTER II
THE CORONATION OF NAPOLEON I
IN the spring of 1 804 the Senate of the French Republic
presented an address to the First Consul submitting
that the supreme magistracy ought to be made heredi-
tary in his person, to protect the nation from the designs of
its enemies abroad and from rival ambitions at home. To
this petition Citizen-Consul Bonaparte deigned to give a
favourable answer, in order, he said, to enable the people
of France, on the fifteenth anniversary of the fall of the
Bastile, to feel sure that their children would inherit the
benefits of the Revolution.1
On the famous date of July 14, 1789, to which he referred,
the Emperor-designate was a needy lieutenant of not quite
twenty, wearing the uniform of Louis XVI., at Auxonne,
and saving his pittance to visit his widowed mother, who
was struggling to support her orphans in Corsica, whither he
went on leave a few weeks after the Constituent Assembly
had decreed the abolition of privilege at Versailles.2 Events
1 Correspondance de Napolton : — Message au S6nat Conservateur, 5 Flore'al, An xii. (April
24, 1804). Carnot was the only member of the Senate who opposed the creation of the Empire.
The last letter which the First Consul signed " Bonaparte," was written on the day he became
emperor (May 18, 1804) to his colleague CambaceYes to appoint him Arch-chancellor of the
Empire, and it began " Citoyen Consul, Votre litre va changer." Up to this date he had ad-
dressed Talleyrand and Berthier as "Citoyen Ministre." After this Berthier as a marshal and
Cambaceres as arch-chancellor, became ' ' Mon Cousin " ; but Talleyrand was addressed as
"Monsieur Talleyrand" without the nobiliary particule "de" until 1806, when he became
"Monsieur le Prince de Benevent," but never " Mon Cousin."
2 lung : Bonaparte et son temps, I. For reasons of health he did not return to Auxonne till
January 1791, when to relieve his mother's poverty he brought back his brother Louis, aged
THE CORONATION OF NAPOLEON 45
had marched swiftly since then. The frugal subaltern of the
King's army soon gained the good graces of the Jacobins,
and the year 1793, which opened with the execution of his
royal master, ended with his first exploit of arms, in their
service, at Toulon. Then came the victory in the streets
of Paris over the anti-revolutionaries won by Colonel
Bonaparte, his appointment to the command of the army
of Italy, the glorious campaign ending with the Treaty of
Campo Formio, which gave Belgium and the Rhine to
France, the Egyptian expedition, whence he returned to
liberate the nation from the anarchy into which the Revolu-
tion had turned. What is not so generally recognised is
that his seizure of the supreme power on November 9, 1799,
possibly prevented a royal restoration.
The disorderly and corrupt tyranny of the Directory,
under which public credit was bankrupt, commerce para-
lysed, life and property insecure, and crime unpunished,
was producing a widespread feeling of hostility to the
Revolution ; l not indeed to the original principles of the
Revolution, but to its palpable results as seen and suffered
in the misgovernment which it had inflicted on France. To
domestic trouble within was added the fear of invasion from
without, the lately victorious armies of the Republic being
checked in Holland, on the Rhine and beyond the Alps.
Thus the idea was gaining ground that the only alternative
to the Directory was the monarchy. If its restoration had
taken place then, before the reconstruction of France by
twelve, though he had only 900 francs (^36) a year to support them both. This hungry little
brother, who shared his mean chamber, was, fifteen years afterwards, made by him King of
Holland, and in 1808 became the father of the future Napoleon III.
1 "Tout le monde e'tait de'goute' de la Revolution": Cambace'res JLclaircissements intdits
(quoted by M. Vandal in his Avenement de Bonaparte, 1902 : an instructive work which contains
many valuable references to unpublished documents in the Archives de la Guerre and
Archives Nationales, relating to the period of the Coup d'Etat du 18 Brumaire).
46 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Napoleon, to anarchy must have succeeded a fatal civil war.
For the emigres and the Chouans, aided by the monarchies
of the continent, burning to avenge themselves on the Re-
volution, which had defied and chastised them, would have
brought back the Bourbons — not to be mere figure-heads
of a constitutional government, as happened in 1814, but to
rule as kings of the old regime refurbished with its privi-
leges— and France, divided and exhausted, could not have
survived this second struggle.
Fearing this, those who had benefited from the Revolu-
tion turned their thoughts to General Bonaparte, on his
way back from Egypt. On the eve of his landing at
Frejus, the dispirited nation was roused from its dejection
by the successive news of the victories of Brune at Bergen,
of Massena at Zurich, and of the home-coming hero at
Aboukir. So, when he reached Paris, the soldier of the
Revolution, who, in the first year of the Republic, had routed
the armies of kings, was hailed as the master whom France
needed and desired. Not by the reactionaries, for they
foresaw their schemes undone by him. Those who rejoiced
were the regicides of the Convention, the possessors of con-
fiscated lands of the Church and of the nobles, and also the
men whom later he called the ideologues,1 who had a dis-
interested love for the doctrines of the Revolution. All of
these saw in Bonaparte the stoutest obstacle to a restoration
of the old monarchy, and to them were joined the people
of the towns and the emancipated peasantry, who greeted
him as the genius and the fortune of the Revolution come
to life again.
1 While preparing the Coup d'etat General Bonaparte took great pains to conciliate this
class, for which subsequently he expressed his contempt. On the icr Brumaire he attended a
meeting of the Academic des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres, of which he was a member, and
discoursed to the philosophers on the antiquities of Egypt.
THE CORONATION OF NAPOLEON 47
That popular appreciation of Napoleon was accurate.
Without him the Revolution would have been discredited
when ten years old, and France, probably dismembered,
would have departed from the ranks of great nations. He
was the " counter-revolution " only in the sense in which
Robespierre had deserved that title. Indeed, the terrorist
was the more anti-revolutionary of the two, as there is
reason to believe that he aimed at the restoration of the
monarchy in the person of the Comte de Provence.
Napoleon was the organiser of the Revolution, doing his
work of reconstruction so well in four brief years, inter-
rupted by war, that, a century after, it remains the sole
durable monument in France of the great upheaval. Nor
did the imperial attributes, wherewith he completed the
administrative edifice, alter the character which the French
Revolution had assumed at the end of the eighteenth
century. They only substituted one sort of arbitrary rule
for another. The Consulate, which succeeded to the
tyranny of the Directory, was as absolute a regime as the
Empire, and as destitute of representative institutions —
which had never been seriously tried in either of the stages
of the Revolution, and were not imported into France from
England until the Restoration.
On the lines of the Revolution Napoleon had reorganised
France during the Consulate. The proof of that fact is
seen at the present day when a republic, claiming descent
from the great Revolution, has lasted for more than a
generation without effecting any material change in the
institutions which, through many regimes, it inherited from
the Napoleonic settlement. The salient revolutionary
principle perpetuated by Napoleon, in his reconstruction of
France, was the total abolition of privilege, which had
48 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
oppressed the people and ruined the finances of France
under the old regime. The change of the Consulate-for-
life, created in 1802, into a hereditary empire, confirmed
by the vote of the nation, was not a negation of the
essential principles of the Revolution. The Constituent
Assembly had sundered France from its past long before
there was any question of abolishing the hereditary
monarchy, and Louis XVI. might have reigned as a
constitutional king had he known how to sail with the
popular current. It is true that with the Jacobin conquest
the anti-monarchical principle was rapidly adopted by the
revolutionary leaders, after the death of Mirabeau. We
have seen how they wished to impose it on all the nations
of Europe. But Napoleon in inviting the French people
to repudiate it, was no more disloyal to the doctrine of
1789 than he was when he restored liberty of public wor-
ship suppressed under the Terror.
The very fact of a soldier of fortune making himself, by
popular voice, the equal and soon the superior of the chiefs
of all the ancient monarchies, except that of England, which
refused to recognise his imperial rank — that was the most
revolutionary proceeding of all those with which France
had astonished Europe since the meeting of the States-
General in 1789. Napoleon made no pretence of coming
into the hierarchy of monarchs as the representative of any
royalist sentiment that survived in France.1 The royalist
conspiracy of Georges Cadoudal was fomented by his
police so that after crushing it he might mount his revolu-
tionary throne as the manifest enemy of the old monarchy.
1 In the inaccurate literature of Saint Helena, Napoleon is said to have regarded himself
as the inheritor of Louis XVI. But the adoption of such ideas, the outcome of the ambitious
vanity which brought him to his ruin, belong to that later period, when after his marriage
with Marie Louise he is said to have referred to Marie Antoinette as ' ' ma tante. "
THE CORONATION OF NAPOLEON 49
Then, as a supreme act of defiance to the princes of
Europe, he threw them the murdered body of the young
Duke of Enghien, to signify the nature of the imperial
title, which he was to assume just two months after the
crime.
A coronation not graced by the presence of princely
personages would be a maimed rite. The courts of Europe
were not likely to send royal or imperial envoys to assist
at the apotheosis of the French Revolution, the monarchs
of the continent not yet being vassals of the Jacobin
general. So Napoleon provided himself with home-made
princes and princesses, giving those titles to his brothers
and sisters, the threadbare orphans of Ajaccio of the early
days of his military career.1 Three of the brothers were
soon to be kings by his fraternal favour, and one of the
sisters a queen ; but those transient honours did not arrive
in time for the coronation, — the map of Europe required some
preliminary adjustments, soon to be made on the battlefields
of the Empire. But though the monarchies refrained from
sending their sons, one venerable sovereign took a journey
of twenty-four days to assist at the coronation of the hero
of the Revolution. Pius VII. did not come a willing guest
to Paris. Yet his treatment at the hands of the revolu-
tionary autocrat was only the obvious consequence of his
own opportunist policy, which had earned him the papacy,
when, as " Citizen Cardinal " Chiaramonti, he had in a
famous homily blessed the French Revolution, and thus
obtained from General Lannes the promise of the succes-
1 Only three years before their arrival at princely rank, their position was not brilliant.
M. de Barante, who was a functionary of the Empire, relates that in 1801 he met the First
Consul's sister, Mme. Bacciochi (Elisa), travelling alone at Carcassonne " dans une mauvaise
auberge, couche"e sur un matelas par terre, pour e'chapper aux punaises." Barante : I. app. v.
Elisa was made sovereign Princess of Lucca and Grand Duchess of Tuscany.
D
50 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
sion to Pius VI., who was to die the prisoner of the Directory
at Valence.1
The royal sanctuary at Reims was no place for the
crowning of the soldier of the Revolution. His choice was
the Invalides, where, under Mansard's gilded dome, he was
to be laid nearly twenty years after his death, when his
second burial evoked feeling which eventually brought
Louis Bonaparte to the throne and gave, for a season, the
semblance of hereditary character to the Napoleonic crown.
But the church which Louis XIV. had built for his veterans
was too cramped for a popular pageant, so Napoleon
decided to go to Notre Dame. In view of the crowds
attracted by the spectacle, he issued characteristic orders to
pull down houses to clear the way for the procession
through the narrow streets which then lay between the
Tuileries and the island of the City.2 The throng was not
swelled by many foreign sightseers. Means of locomotion
were not easy in 1804, and the only nation which then sent
forth intrepid tourists was warned off. Eight weeks before
the great day Napoleon told Fouche, not yet a duke but
only a regicide turned policeman, that he wanted no English
in Paris.3 This was not surprising, as the previous week he
had informed Berthier that when the Irish expedition was
ready the army of Boulogne would cross the straits and
penetrate into the county of Kent. Nevertheless, at this
1 The Bishop of Imola's eulogy of the republican system on Christmas Day, 1797, when his
diocese was overrun by the revolutionary army under Lannes, must perhaps not be too
harshly criticised. Some authorities say that his election to the papacy, at the Conclave of
Venice in 1799, was unexpected. The Abb6 de Montgaillard speaks of the future Pope as
" Citoyen Cardinal " (Montgaillard, v. 86), and there are letters of GeneVal Bonaparte extant in
which archbishops are addressed as " Citoyen Archeveque. " The death of Pius VI. was entered
by the municipal officer of Valence as that of " Jean Ange Braschi, profession, Pontife."
2 Correspondance de Napolton : 15 Thermidor, an xii. (August 3, 1804).
3 " Je ne veux point d'anglais a Paris : e'loignez tous ceux qui s'y trouvent." Correspondance
de NapoUon : 15 Vend^miaire, an xiii. (October 7, 1804).
THE CORONATION OF NAPOLEON 51
period of hostile relations, when England was the only
implacable enemy of France and of the Revolution, so
little trace of Anglophobia was there in the Parisian press
that even the official Moniteur found space, during the busy
season of the coronation, for courteous reference to English
topics.1
The nations of Europe were however represented in Paris
by a small company of envoys, whose august masters had
sent them not from love of the Revolution, but from fear of
its victorious hero. The British ambassador had departed
a year before the proclamation of the Empire. Lord
Whitworth's mission, after the Peace of Amiens, was brief
and stormy, and his despatch to Lord Hawkesbury describ-
ing his altercation with 'the First Consul on February 20,
1803, was soon followed by his recall. The monarchs of the
continent, who were soon to be the bondsmen of Napoleon,
were not brilliantly represented at his coronation. Prussia,
whose subserviency to him roused the scorn of England,
had, as ambassador at the new imperial court, Luchesini, an
Italian marquis, who began his career as librarian to the
great Frederick and ended it, when Frederick William III.
and Napoleon had come to blows, in his native Tuscan city
as chamberlain to Elisa Bonaparte, sovereign Princess of
Lucca. The Emperor of Germany and Austria, the doub-
ling of whose title the previous August presaged the dis-
appearance of its Holy Roman heritage, was represented at
1 Thus in the Moniteur of 2 Brumaire, an xiii. (October 24, 1804), five weeks before the
coronation, there is a long and amiable review of " Parson's and Galignani's British Library
in verse and prose," which is welcomed as a valuable selection of the admirable literature of
England. The week after the coronation, the Moniteur of 19 Frimaire (December 10) denies
in polite language the rumour that George III. and the Prince of Wales are on bad terms.
The acrimony towards England which has often been a characteristic of Parisian journals
under the friendly Third Republic is entirely absent from Napoleon's official organs in 1804
when we were at war with France.
52 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
the coronation of his future son-in-law by Cobenzl, a cousin
of the better-known diplomatist of that name who was
colleague of Lord Whitworth at the court of Catherine of
Russia. The ambassador of his Catholic Majesty, whose
throne was soon destined for Joseph Bonaparte, was the
ill-starred Gravina, the admiral of the Spanish fleet, who a
year later lay dying of the wound he had received at
Trafalgar the day that Nelson fell. Two republics likewise
were represented. The ephemeral Batavian Republic sent
Schimmelpenninck, whom Napoleon the next year made
grand-pensionary of Holland, and then deprived him of
the post when he put his brother there as king. The
other one, the new American Republic, was the only
government, represented at the coronation, which neither
disliked the Revolution nor feared Napoleon. The envoy
of the United States was also the accredited representative
of the hostility of the revolted colonies for their mother-
country, which they were soon actively to renew by their
alliance with Napoleon against England in its struggle
with him.1
1 1 am unable to ascertain who represented the United States at the Coronation of Napoleon.
His name does not appear in the Moniteur, and M. Sorel, who knows almost everything con-
nected with the diplomatic history of this period, could not help me. The Secretary of the
United States Embassy in Paris, kindly informed me that Robert R. Livingston was American
Minister to France up to November 18, 1804, when he took formal leave and was succeeded
by John Armstrong, who had been appointed on June 3oth, 1804. Mr Vignaud added,
" Livingston could not therefore have attended the coronation in any official capacity, for he
was no longer U. S. Minister ; but there is no record of the day that Armstrong arrived in
Paris and assumed the duties of his post." Now Livingston was an old colonist of great
distinction, the last chancellor of the State of New York and the first minister for Foreign
Affairs of the revolted colonies. It was to a member of his family, Edward Livingston, that
Bonaparte wrote, the month before he became Emperor (15 Germinal, an xii. ), accepting mem-
bership of the Literary Society of New York. It therefore seemed unlikely that Robert Living-
ston should depart from Paris on the very eve of the coronation ; so I asked Mr Whitelaw
Reid if he could clear up the matter. Mr Reid in an interesting communication told me that
the records of the State Department at Washington failed to do so, as on December 2, 1804,
there were three American ministers in Paris,— Livingston, who had presented his letters of
THE CORONATION OF NAPOLEON 53
The spectacle which these envoys witnessed was remark-
able even at the revolutionary period when diplomatists
were used to curious sights. Everything connected with
the coronation was born of the Revolution, except the
ecclesiastics at the altar and the old church itself, which for
six centuries had watched the growth of France under the
ancient monarchy, since its walls arose when Philippe
Auguste was making her a nation. Everything was new in
the procession which, on this cold Sunday morning in
December 1804, took two hours to wind through a short
mile of narrow streets. The imperial arms and crown on
the state coach were new, so were the pompous heralds, so
were the five princesses who were to bear the train of their
imperial sister-in-law. Not with Josephine alone did
Napoleon proceed to Notre Dame. In the carriage with
them were Louis, the husband of Hortense, the daughter
of the Empress, and Joseph, another future king, whose
seating on the throne of Spain was to cause the downfall of
his brother's empire. The family coach-load was completed
by the notable woman on whose tomb at Ajaccio is graven
the inscription Mater Regum, and who on that day was
saluted as ''Madame Mere" — the noblest and the only
durable title of those which Napoleon showered on his
relatives. At the head of the procession rode a gorgeous
recall, Armstrong, who had handed his credentials to Talleyrand, but was not formally intro-
duced to the Emperor till three weeks after the coronation, and James Monroe, who had come
on a special mission about the Louisiana purchase, but had not been received by Napoleon.
Mr Reid, who is related to the family of two of these ministers, says that in David's picture of
the Sacre, the portrait of the American Minister, who is represented in "colonial costume,"
is not unlike a French portrait of Livingston, of the same date, which belongs to the New
York Historical Society. Mr Whitelaw Reid was the distinguished envoy chosen by the
Government of the United States to be its special ambassador :\t the Coronation of King
Edward VII., and to his deep regret was not permitted to remain for the postponed ceremony.
As his name is printed in the early official lists of the guests invited to Westminster Abbey,
perhaps in days to come a similar controversy will arise as to whether or not he was present
at the coronation, which may be cleared up by the unearthing of this note.
54 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
horseman, Murat, the son of a village innkeeper, who on
the day that his brother-in-law sighted Saint Helena, was
put to death, a discrowned king, on the shore of Calabria.
Within the church, Murat's fellow-chiefs of the army
of the Revolution were the most distinguished figures.
Eighteen of them were created marshals of France the day
after the proclamation of the Empire. They were not yet
adorned with ducal and princely titles, taken from the
battles they had helped to win and the provinces which
they had helped to annex — titles, be it said, which were
merely decorations and did not confer on their holders any
of the privileges associated with nobility under the old
regime. In the first rank was Bernadotte, the son of a
notary at Pau, who from Prince of Pontecorvo became
Crown Prince of Sweden, and separating from his master
before his fall, unlike him founded a permanent dynasty.
Near him was Lannes, who started life as a dyer, and who
was Duke of Montebello when he fell in the hour of victory
at Essling. There was Augereau, the fruiterer's son, to
whom the campaign of Italy gave his future name of Duke
of Castiglione, and who was as audacious in his apostasies
as he was on the field of battle. There was old Keller-
mann, who had risen from the ranks before the Revolution,
and whose future title of Valmy was taken from a revolu-
tionary victory won while Louis XVI. was still alive. There
was Berthier, whose father was a land surveyor, and who as
Prince of Wagram and sovereign Prince of Neufchatel was
able to wed a highborn princess of royal blood. There was
Lefevre/the husband of " Madame Sans-Gene," who enlisted
to escape from holy orders, and who as Duke of Dantzic lived
to be a peer under the clerical government of Louis XVIII.
There was Ney, the son of a cooper, the "bravest of the
THE CORONATION OF NAPOLEON 55
brave," whose title of Prince of Moskowa was not so
recognised by that monarch, who had him shot by French
soldiers six months after his supreme exploits of courage
at Waterloo. There was Soult, who had a unique experi-
ence of coronations, as after the emperor, crowned to-day,
was buried at Saint Helena, the Duke of Dalmatia bore
the sceptre of Charles X. at Reims, and also lived to
represent Louis Philippe, the supplanter of the legitimate
king, at the crowning of Queen Victoria.
The significance of the scene at Notre Dame was centred
in this group of revolutionary warriors. They and their
crowned chief represented the triumph, by armed force, of
the French Revolution, which rescued it from anarchy at
home and caused it to leave a permanent impression on
Europe. The civilian performers in the pageant had not
the same importance, though they too were characteristic of
the Revolution. Maret, one of the ablest, a lawyer from
Dijon, was soon, as Duke of Bassano, to arrange the second
marriage of Napoleon, after the divorce of Josephine, in
which delicate negotiations he was tactfully aided by her
own son Eugene de Beauharnais, Viceroy of Italy, who, as
a general officer, attended his mother's coronation. But
the most interesting figure among the non-combatant sons
of the Revolution was the grand-chamberlain of the Empire,
M. de Talleyrand, sometime Bishop of Autun, and soon to
be Prince of Beneventum — ex-chaplain of Louis XVI.,
ex-agent of the Convention, ex-minister of the Directory,
future minister of the Restoration, future ambassador of the
Monarchy of July. At Vale^ay, which he acquired by the
grace of his imperial master, until the chateau was dis-
mantled in 1899, his bust by Houdon smiled with lifelike
complacency on the full-length portraits of Napoleon, Louis
56 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
XVI II., Charles X., and Louis Philippe, presented to him
by those respective monarchs, who had no illusions about
the sincerity of the services which he rendered, untroubled
by prejudice, to three successive dynasties. Talleyrand,
more than any other of his prodigious generation, personified
the Revolution in all its phases. The ceremony he took
part in at Notre Dame was presided over by another
opportunist, Pope Pius VII., who, two years before, by
special brief, had limited for him the effect of the sacred
formula Tu es sacerdos in aeternum.
The sacrament of orders was not the only one which the
papacy made light of at the behest of its new protector. It
made equally short work of the sacrament of marriage,
when Josephine, most solemnly consecrated here to-day as
the wife of Napoleon by the infallible Vicar of Christ, was
repudiated, in order that the Church might bless the union
of the organiser of the Revolution with a daughter of the
Caesars. Nor can the Church be blamed for having dis-
played its vital flexibility at this crisis in the history of
Christendom. It was better for Pius VII. to bow to the
imperious will of the author of the Concordat, who had
restored public worship, than to die, like Pius VI., the
exiled prisoner of the revolutionary government. The
nephew of that pontiff, Cardinal Braschi, evidently took
that view, for he was at the high altar, in attendance
on his uncle's successor. Three other princes of the
Church, also present, had been witnesses of its vicissi-
tudes in the eighteenth century, or had displayed the
versatility of its ministers in the revolutionary period.
The most venerable of these was Cardinal de Belloy, who,
nearly a hundred years old, had seen Madame de
Maintenon, Minister of Public Worship, and Fenelon, Arch-
THE CORONATION OF NAPOLEON 57
bishop of Cambrai, and had succeeded to the mitre of the
saintly Belsunce at Marseilles when Massillon had laid
aside his only twelve years. Born under Louis XIV., in
the year of Malplaquet, when Anne was Queen of England,
and Peter the Great Tsar of Russia, thirty years before
Frederick the Great began to make Prussia a power, the
First Consul had named him Archbishop of Paris at the age
of ninety-three. Relatively young was the Cardinal Legate
Caprara, who, beginning his career fifty years before, under
the protection of Benedict XIV., the learned and sagacious
Lambertini, inspired the confidence of Maria Theresa, and
before his death was to anoint Napoleon King of Italy at
Milan. There was also Cardinal Fesch, who had deserted
his pious vocation, when it became unpopular, for a post
in the commissariat of the revolutionary army, and only
resumed it when his nephew became the patron of the
Church, by whose affection the strayed parish priest was
consoled with the primacy of the Gauls and a scarlet hat.
The best-known incident of the day, which distinguished
this coronation from all others, was when Napoleon himself
placed the laurel crown upon his head, to show that the
Pope had been summoned from Rome only as a figure
to embellish the spectacular triumph of the Revolution.
But this was not a sudden act of masterful impulse.
Napoleon was, to use the language of our day, a con-
summate actor-manager. Pius VII. himself recognised
his dramatic genius when, on another forced visit to
France, during his captivity at Fontainebleau in 1813, he
addressed the Emperor, in their native Italian, as comediante,
tragediante. The great master of detail did not improvise l
1 Isabey, whose sketches of the Sacre are as valuable to the historian as is the better-
known painting by David at the Louvre, gives an interesting account of how the Emperor
58 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
the most significant feature in the pageant. Posing as the
Charlemagne of the French Revolution, he pretended that
in crowning himself he followed the legendary ritual
ordained by his prototype for the coronation of his son
Louis le Debonnaire — an unfortunate precedent, seeing
that under that virtuous and twice-deposed prince the
Carlovingian Empire was dismembered.1 However that
may be, there is evidence that Napoleon always intended
to crown himself. On the eve of the coronation the
Moniteur'2- published the authorised ceremonial, and was
most explicit about the blessing of the crown, the anoint-
ing of the Emperor, and the other functions attributed to
the Pope. It also indicated that the Empress would be
crowned on her knees by her husband ; but it significantly
said nothing about the crowning of Napoleon. He had,
however, a month before this, in a letter to Cardinal Fesch,
directing him to hasten the Pope on his way, said distinctly
that if the Holy Father were not in Paris by the appointed
day, the coronation would take place without him, and the
arranged in advance every detail of the ceremony. M. de Se'gur, the author of the famous
memoirs, an old courtier and diplomatist of the monarchy who had rallied to the new regime,
had been appointed Grand Master of the Ceremonies. His ideas were trammelled by the
traditions of the ancient court, so Napoleon sent for Isabey, and ordered him to make seven
drawings, representing the ceremony at its different stages, as he thought it ought to take
place. The great draughtsman found this commission beyond his powers, so in thirty-six
hours he got modelled an army of dolls, all dressed to represent the persons taking part in
the coronation. These he took to the Emperor at Fontainebleau, who was delighted at the
invention of the artist, and with these marionettes rehearsed every detail of the ceremony.
/. B. Isabey, sa vie ses ceuvres, par E. Taigny.
1 The invocation of the legendary Carlovingian precedent was of course merely a piece of
theatrical pose. The examples are not rare of modern sovereigns crowning themselves,
including some who were not great potentates. The Elector of Brandenburg, who became
first King of Prussia in 1701, crowned himself at Konigsberg. He was the monarch of whom
Macaulay said, "Compared with the other crowned heads of Europe he made a figure re-
sembling that which a nabob who had bought a title would make in the company of peers
whose ancestors had been attainted for treason against the Plantagenets. " King William I.
of Prussia followed this precedent and crowned himself on October 18, 1861, and afterwards
crowned Queen Augusta. It is still the practice of the Tsars of Russia to crown themselves.
2 Moniteur, 9 Frimaire, an xiii. (November 30, 1804).
THE CORONATION OF NAPOLEON 59
anointing would be postponed until such time as he could
officiate.1
The coronation of Napoleon placed the French Revolu-
tion on a new footing. The chief of the revolutionary
army, who between two campaigns had created out of
chaos a new France, orderly and prosperous, was hence-
forth a member of the hierarchy of European sovereigns.
Already he addressed himself to them as their "good
brother," 2 and prepared to treat them with that fraternity
which was the device of his Jacobin masters under the
Terror. Soon the proudest monarchies of the continent
were in as subservient a posture before him as was the
papacy at Notre Dame. Without his assumption of the
imperial crown his European supremacy, won on the field
of battle as the chief of the revolutionised nation which he
had reconstructed, would have taken a different and less
effective form. As an uncrowned dictator of a republic,
with all his military prowess and his administrative genius,
he could never have contrived the striking effects produced
when he made monarchies his vassals or carved out new
kingdoms for himself and his kindred. His personal
ambition, no doubt, and not a desire to propagate the
influence of the French Revolution, caused him to crown
himself emperor and to proceed to fresh conquests which
put the whole continent at the feet of France. But, what-
ever his motives, he was, as emperor, the instrument
whereby the after effects of the Revolution left their
1 Correspondance de Napoldon, 14 Brumaire, an xiii. (November 5, 1804). " Je veux bien
differer jusqu'au n Frimaire, pour tout de"lai : et si, a cette e"poque, le Pape n'6tait point
arrive", le couronnement aurait lieu, et Ton serait forc6 de remettre le sacre."
2 On September 23, 1804, he wrote to the Emperor of Germany to congratulate him, with
some irony, "Surl" ejection de sa maison, en maison h6r6ditaire d'Autriche," and signed
himself "de votre Majest6 Impe"riale. le bon frere, Napol6on." The letter was dated in the
revolutionary style (like all his correspondence at this period) " Ier Vend^miaire, an xiii."
60 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
impress, in one way or another, on every country of
Europe. England, whose government refused to recognise
the Empire,1 and whose people to the end called the
Emperor " Bonaparte," was less affected than other lands,
never having had to submit to him. Indeed, the identifica-
tion in English minds of the French Revolution, in its
later stages, with their bugbear Napoleon was, as we have
seen, the cause which checked the spread of the revolutionary
idea in our nation.
In the view of English writers and caricaturists of the
period, the coronation of Napoleon was the triumph of
the Revolution, recognised by the ancient monarchies of
the continent. 2 They were his tributaries two and a half
years later, when, after Austerlitz, Jena and Friedland, he
had in the space of eighteen months crushed Austria,
Prussia and Russia. At Notre Dame he had sworn not
to diminish the territories of the Republic — as the govern-
ment continued to be called, until 1807, on his coins and in
his official documents. He kept his word, and when the
Empire took over the domains of the Republic, Hamburg
and Aix-la-Chapelle, Amsterdam and Brussels, Cologne
and Geneva, had become capitals of French departments,
1 There was a slight movement towards the recognition of the Empire by England in 1806,
during Fox's short term of office as Secretary for Foreign Affairs. Fox, as the friend of the
French Revolution, after the death of its implacable enemy Pitt, wished to recognise Napoleon,
and on August i, 1806, Lords Yarmouth and Lauderdale were appointed commissioners for
negotiating a peace with France. Fox, however, went out of office for ever the following month,
as he died on the following September 13. In the Memorial de Sainte Htlene Napoleon is
said to have lamented that "La mort de Fox a et6 une des fatalities de ma carriere."
2 e.g. the caricature of Gilray, entitled The Grand Procession of Napoleone, the ist Emperor
of France, from the Church of Notre Dame, in which the various groups are labelled " Berthier,
Bernadotte, Augereau, and all the brave train of republican generals " ; " Puissant continental
powers, train-bearers to the Emperor"; "Ladies of Honour, ci-devant Poissardes, train-
bearers to the Empress " ; " His Holiness Pope Pius VII., conducted by his old faithful friend,
Cardinal Fesch, offering the incense"; " Talleyrand- Perigord, Prime Minister and King of
Arms, bearing the Emperor's genealogy."
THE CORONATION OF NAPOLEON 61
to say nothing of the French prefectures of his kingdom of
Italy which he had installed at Turin, Genoa, Florence
and Rome. But France retained none of his conquests
after he had disappeared in the abyss into which his
insensate ambition had drawn him. In November 1811
he said to De Pradt, the confidential chaplain, whom he
made archbishop and ambassador, " In five years I shall
be master of the world." l At the date indicated he had
been for thirteen months a helpless captive on the narrow
rock of Saint Helena, and the limits of France had been
reduced to those which bounded it till 1860, when Nice and
Savoy were reannexed. The coronation of Napoleon did
not therefore mark the permanent establishment of a wide
territorial empire. Nor had it any dynastic importance.
The hereditary character, attributed to his crown by the
vote of the same people which had made the Revolution
fifteen years before, was ineffective ; and when another
Bonaparte restored the empire, forty-eight years after the
coronation at Notre Dame, he had to declare that his style
and title of Napoleon the Third implied no pretension to
that imperial heredity which was condemned by the powers
at the Congress of Vienna.2
The coronation of Napoleon is of historical importance,
because it was the consecration of the French Revolution
in the person of its organiser, who, with his sword and the
glamour of his imperial attributes, carried the doctrine and
the institutions of the Revolution all over Europe. The
1 De Pradt, 23.
2 " Mon regne ne date pas de 1815, il date de ce moment meme ou vous venez de me faire
connaitre les volont^s de la nation," Discours aux stnateurs et dtputts a Saint Cloud, i"
Dfcembre 1852. His friend, Lord Malmesbury, who was Secretary for Foreign Affairs, made
an elaborate explanation in the House of Lords the same week, in the same sense, with
reference to the title of Napoleon III.
62 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
codes which he enacted, the system of administration which
he devised for the reconstitution of France, he imposed on
the lands he conquered. Those countries, though they
soon threw off his domination, have retained many institu-
tions born of the Revolution as the basis of their civic life.
Moreover, before the French Revolution political power in
the nations of the continent was shared, in different degrees,
by the monarch, the clergy and the nobles, to the exclusion
of the commonalty. It was the Emperor Napoleon, although
the most absolute of autocrats by temperament, who, by a
paradox, readjusted the political systems of central and
southern Europe in the direction of admitting the Third
Estate to a share of the government. It was the Emperor
Napoleon who, with the warlike prestige of his revolu-
tionary crown, put an end to the Holy Roman Empire and,
less definitively, exiled from their thrones the Bourbons
who remained after the deposition of Louis XVI. They re-
turned after his disappearance to misgovern their kingdoms,
while other territories annexed by Napoleon were severed
again from France. But in spite of the reaction which
followed his fall, and the re-arrangement of the map of
Europe at the Congress of Vienna, the traces left on these
lands by the soldier of the Revolution were ineffaceable.
That Napoleon was the dreaded propagandist of the
Revolution was shown by the attitude and policy of the
arch-enemies of modern progress, the chiefs of the con-
tinental monarchies, as soon as he was overthrown and put
away safely out of reach. Then only did they venture to
form the Holy Alliance for the purpose of arresting the
doctrines of the French Revolution. In the next genera-
tion the revolutionary movements of 1830 and 1848 were
the indirect result of Napoleon's work. They were
THE CORONATION OF NAPOLEON 63
provoked by the reactionary policy of the monarchies
which had leagued themselves together to counteract his
influence as the instrument of the great Revolution, which
he consecrated to the use of Europe when he crowned
himself at Notre Dame in 1804.
CHAPTER III
THE PROCLAMATION OF WILLIAM OF PRUSSIA AS
GERMAN EMPEROR
IN the years succeeding the Coronation of Napoleon,
when
" Tons les rois Padoraient, lui marchant sur leurs tetes,
Eux baisant son talon," l
the son of one of those prostrate kings was having his
childish memory impressed with the humiliation by France
of his mother, of his father, and of his fatherland.
Prince William of Prussia, who in his seventy-fourth
year became the first German Emperor, was born in 1797,
eight months before the death of his grandfather, Frederick
William II., the inglorious successor and nephew of the
great Frederick, who, after largely increasing his territory,
ended his reign by ceding to France all the Prussian
possessions on the left bank of the Rhine. The young
William was therefore nine years old when his father,
Frederick William III., fled from the field of Jena before
Napoleon, who ten days later, in token of the annihilation
of Prussia, sent to Paris the sword of Frederick the Great,
taken from his tomb at Potsdam, with his trophies of the
Seven Years' War.2
1 Victor Hugo, Les Chatiments.
2 " L'empereur a e"t6 voir le tombeau du Grand Fre'de'ric. II a fait present a 1'Hotel des
Invalides de Paris, de l'6pee de Frederic, de son cordon de 1'Aigle Noir, de sa ceinture de
general, ainsi que des drapeaux que portait sa Garde dans la Guerre de Sept Ans" (/<?<
Bulletin de la Grande ArnUe. Potsdam, 26 Octobre 1806). And the following day, " L'Em-
pereur s'est saisi de ces trophies et a dit : ' J'aime mieux cela que vingt millions.' "
64
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 65
The mother of the young prince was the beautiful Queen
Louise, who almost fell into the hands of Napoleon at
Jena, when he had her pursued by a squadron of hussars
to Weimar, as he boasted in a letter to his minister, Talley-
rand.1 After many cruel privations she escaped with the
King to Konigsberg, where she was so destitute that she
appealed to friends in England to supply her with clothing.2
It was when wearing one of the gowns so provided that
she had to submit to the insolent compliments of the con-
queror. For no mortification was spared her ; and at
Tilsit, when Prussia was reduced to the secondary position
which it had held before the partition of Poland, Napoleon,
not content with having the Tsar Alexander and King
Frederick William in waiting upon him, insisted on the
presence of Queen Louise at his table, and then refused all
the concessions which she had hoped so to earn.3
1 Correspondance de Napolton, 15 October 1806.
Stafford House Letters, edited by Lord Ronald Gower, Part I. These letters from Lord
G wer to his mother, Lady Stafford, afterwards Duchess-Countess of Sutherland, were
written during a tour in 1806-7, when the writer was the witness of the vicissitudes of the
King and Queen of Prussia. On December 8, 1806, he writes: "At Ortelsburg, the last
headquarters, the Queen had only one small room to sleep in, and that full of bugs." Two
months later he sends to his mother a gown of the Queen as a pattern for one to be made in
London, which "she begs may not be very expensive," and, he adds, "God only knows
where the Queen may be obliged to fly to, so that it is impossible for me to tell you where to
send the gown." A letter of June 17, 1807, announces the arrival of three gowns at Memel, —
just in time for the dinners she was forced to accept from Napoleon at Tilsit in the first days
of July. Lord Gower, who became second Duke of Sutherland and the husband of the Duchess
who took an important part in the Coronation of ueen Victoria, was as a child in Paris with
his father, who was ambassador to Louis XVI. The editor of his letters, who is a well-known
writer in the twentieth century, is thus the son of a playmate of the Dauphin who died in the
Temple in 1795.
3 The epithet ' ' insolent " is not too strong to apply to the treatment of the Queen of
Prussia by Napoleon. On July 8, 1807, he writes from Tilsit to Josephine; "La reine de
Prusse est re"ellement charmante : elle est pleine de coquetterie pour moi : mais n'en sois
pas jalouse: je suis une toile cire'e, sur laquelle tout cela ne fait que glisser. II m'en
couterait trop cher pour faire le galant." This letter is from the Memorial de Sainte Httenc,
which is not ordinarily a trustworthy source ; but it is printed in the official edition of the
Correspondance de NapoUon. That magnificent work, published in twenty-four folio volumes,
by command of Napoleon III., in 1854-58, is not to be relied upon as a complete collection of
Napoleon's letters, as many are omitted which show him in a too unfavourable light. The
E
66 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
The unhappy queen succumbed to her afflictions in 1810.
It was the year in which Napoleon, to show that the re-
volutionary ruler of France was the suzerain of all the states
of vanquished Germany, had claimed in marriage Marie
Louise of Hapsburg, — the kinswoman of Marie Antoinette,
another German princess who died the victim of the
French. Four years later Prince William, at the age of
seventeen, began the revenge which as an aged man he
was destined to complete. With his father and the allied
sovereigns he entered Paris in triumph after the campaign
of 1814, which ended with the first abdication of Napoleon.
In 1815 he returned after the crowning victory of Waterloo,
to which the Prussians had joyfully contributed, when the
Congress of Vienna restored to Prussia the territories taken
by Napoleon and added to its domain.
Prince William was not the heir to the Prussian
monarchy. His elder brother, who succeeded as Frederick
William IV. in 1840, like him had conceived a deep
antipathy to France during the wars with Napoleon. But
unlike him he was no soldier, and had no desire to make
Prussia the head of the German Confederation. A romantic
pietist, he hated the French Revolution because it had
destroyed the Holy Roman Empire, and his ideal of a
united Germany was one in which Austria should have the
primary and Prussia the second place.
The advance of Prussia to be the predominant German
power dates from 1851, when, after the revolution which
gave a representative form of government to that country,
above letter would, therefore, have not been included had there been any doubt as to its
authenticity. In the Bulletins de la Grande Arm^e, dated from Potsdam, Napoleon compares
Queen Louise with Lady Hamilton, and says that she and her intrigues with the Tsar
Alexander are the causes of the war — an imputation which roused the indignation of Taine,
Le Rtgime Moderne, I. c. II. 5. The insolence of Napoleon to the Queen is corroborated in
the Stafford House letters quoted above.
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 67
Otto von Bismarck took his seat as its delegate at the
Imperial Diet at Frankfort. From that moment there was
a vigorous influence at work in Germany which had no other
aim than the aggrandisement of Prussia. The career of
Bismarck thus began in the same period as that of Louis
Napoleon, in whom he recognised a possible obstacle to his
projects. His object henceforth was to prevent a union
between Austria and France. Events favoured his plans
when, in 1859, France joined Sardinia in the war against
Austria, and when, after the inconclusive Peace of Villa-
franca, Prince William, who was in sympathy with his
ideas, and had already been acting as Regent, was defini-
tively named Regent of Prussia, by reason of the incapacity
of the King. Austria, deserted in the hour of need by her
natural ally, looked with misgiving on the development of
Prussia under the active rule of the Regent, who undertook
the much-needed reform of the army. When William I. at
last mounted the throne in 1861, he was, in spite of the
opposition of his parliament, the chief of a growing military
power, and when the next year he made Bismarck his
prime minister, the doom of Austrian supremacy was sealed,
though few suspected the importance of that appointment.1
Henceforth the united aims of master and man became
more ambitious Not only was Prussia to be supreme in
Germany, but Germany under the leadership of Prussia
was to take the place in Europe of France, which,
advancing in influence under the Second Empire, seemed
1 The Times "Annual Summary" for 1862 did not even mention the name of Bismarck,
though it devoted considerable space to Prussian affairs. It called King William " the
commonplace soldier now on the throne" ; it referred to the late King as " his more gifted
brother," and it exhorted the King of Prussia to study the example of the Emperor of the
French. It also announced that "In the minor states of Germany the authority of Austria
has increased in consequence of the internal dissensions which impair the credit of Prussia."
68 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
to be for ever secure against a revenge for Jena. Inter-
national events, however, aided Bismarck's cunning diplo-
macy. Among them were the refusals of England and
France to intervene on behalf of the Poles, oppressed by
Russia with the support of Prussia, in 1863, and to take
up arms for Denmark, attacked by Prussia and Austria in
1 864. When little Denmark was plundered by the two great
German powers, the partition of the annexed duchies of
Schleswig, Holstein and Lauenburg, afforded the pretext
for the rupture between Austria and Prussia, which was
essential to the projects of Bismarck and of William. The
neutrality of France was, however, necessary to their accom-
plishment, and Napoleon III. lent himself to that suicidal
policy by a series of unforeseeing acts.
It was at Biarritz, during the season of 1865, tnat tne
nephew of the marauder of the tomb of Frederick the
Great finally played into the hands of the restorers of
Prussia, and allowed the astute agent of King William to
secure for his master the imperial sceptre of Germany and
the abasement of the nation which had humiliated his father
and mother at Tilsit. The tourists who now frequent the
inn, which was once the marine villa built to please the
fancy of the Empress Eugenie, little know that within its
walls the history of modern Europe was changed.1 For it
was there that Bismarck so prevailed upon Napoleon III.,
that he returned to Berlin taking with him the amazing
assurance that France would regard with favour the
aggrandisement of Prussia. On his way to Biarritz he
called at Ferrieres to shoot the pheasants of Baron de
Rothschild, in company with Colonel de Galliffet and
1 The Villa ImpeYiale, known of late years as the Hotel du Palais, was burnt down while
this page was being printed.
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 69
other Frenchmen,1 whom he treated with that boisterous
cordiality which was one of his diplomatic weapons. Five
years later he returned to Ferrieres, an uninvited guest, to
superintend a different kind of shooting. This time he was
accompanied by his monarch, and Generals von Moltke
and von Roon, to all of whom he had been able, three
weeks before, to point out Colonel de Galliffet, from the
hill above Sedan where the King and his counsellors
watched the futile bravery of the French light horse as it
fell beneath the calvary of Illy. The mission to Biarritz
had succeeded beyond his most sanguine dreams. Napoleon
III. had looked on while Austria was crushed by Prussia.
Sadowa had led to Sedan, where, in delivering his sword to
his " good brother " King William, he used for the last time
the formula with which his uncle liked to address monarchs
of ancient dynasties. His good brother was now on the
road to Versailles, to try the endurance of the people of
Paris, who had deposed their emperor instead of surrender-
ing with him.
On January 18, 1871, the Germans had been for four
months at Versailles. On a fine October morning the
King of Prussia had driven over from Ferrieres to take up
his quarters with the besieging army, passing sumptuous
chateaux and picturesque villages, scattered among the
woodlands of Seine-et-Oise, now deserted by their inhabi-
tants and occupied by his troops. Paris would capitulate in
1 It was on October 5, 1865, that Bismarck left M. de Rothschild's table to catch the train
which took him on his fateful mission to Biarritz, where, under the pretext of sea-bathing, he
stayed till the end of the month. Busch, in his infamous Secret Pages, puts the date of this
famous partie de chasse as November 3rd, 1856. 1856 may be a misprint, but November 3rd
is a characteristic inaccuracy in a work worthy of the worst traditions of journalism. General
de Galliffet has since been heard to regret that he did not have a shot at Count Bismarck in
the covers of Ferrieres, an accident which would have changed the fate of France. Bismarck
returned to Ferrieres on September 19, 1870, and left for Versailles on October 5.
70 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
three weeks, it was then predicted. But now the autumn
had passed, and the new year had come. To the rigours of
the siege were added the horrors of the bombardment, and
the doomed city still held out. While Paris was thus in
the grip of the invader blow after blow had fallen on the
diminished armies of France. Metz had been betrayed ;
the devastated valley of the Loire was a forlorn monument
of brave but vain resistance ; the fair suburbs of the capital,
from Champigny to Bougival, were soldiers' sepulchres, to
commemorate dauntless sorties of the beleagured garrison.
M. Thiers had come and gone. The tragic mission of the
old French patriot, supplicating for easier terms of peace
from a relentless conqueror, beneath the shadow of the
palace, reared by Louis the Great to all the glories of
France, had been the supreme humiliation of the statesman
who had foretold the disastrous results of the policy of
Napoleon III.1 The harshest winter of recent years had
set in, weeks before, with premature severity, and the
frozen air, which added to the tortures of the wounded and
the privations of the besieged, was now lit up at night by
the flames of burning Paris.
But the end was at hand. So it was decided that King
William should be proclaimed German Emperor on the
anniversary of the day, in 1701, when the Elector Frederick
crowned himself first King of Prussia at Konigsberg. This
imperial act was to be not only the revenge for Jena and
for the outrages of Napoleon. France had begun to incur
the debt of Prussian vengeance a century before the
French Revolution, when the petty ruler of Brandenburg
1 " Si la guerre est heureuse a la Prusse, on verra refaire un grand empire germanique, cet
empire de Charles-Quint, qui r^sidait autrefois a Vienne, qui r6siderait maintenant a Berlin,
qui serait bien pres de notre frontiere, qui la presserait, qui la serrerait," Corps Ugislalif:
Stance du 3 Mai 1866 (exactly two months before Sadowa).
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE ;i
was earning the title of king, in reward for the hosts he
sent, as allies of the Emperor, to be slain by the armies of
Louis XIV. It was a stupendous coincidence, therefore,
which permitted the head of the lucky house of Hohen-
zollern to receive imperial rank, which Frederick the Great
had never attained, in the palace built by the Grand
Monarque to commemorate the ascendancy of France over
Germany,1 of which the proudest trophy was the annexed
province of Alsace.
German unity, outside the Austrian dominions, had been
effected the day when Napoleon III. declared war which
menaced German territory with French invasion. The
common labours and successes of a victorious campaign had
ratified the union of the states comprising the Germanic
Confederation. It was impossible to contest the leadership
of Prussia. The only question was that of the title to be
borne by the chief of the refashioned combination. The
Holy Roman Empire could not be restored even in name : at
the Congress of Vienna Metternich had persuaded Francis
of Austria, who for fourteen years of his reign had been
called Emperor of Germany, that it was even then too late
to revive that appellation. The title of King of Germany,
which had been borne by the emperors, was suggested,
but rejected lest it should seem to limit the sovereignty
of the Kings of Bavaria, Saxony and Wurtemberg. The
first named of those kingdoms, which, after siding with
Austria in the war of 1866, had loyally served under
1 In 1680 two medals were simultaneously struck by Louis XIV., one in honour of the
submission of the ten cities of Alsace, " Alsatia in provinciam redacta," the other to com-
memorate the construction of the Chateau de Versailles. Previous medals of Louis XIV.
of that decade have as their legends, " LX. Millia Germanorum ultra Rhenum pulsa," and
"A Rheno ad Albim pulso Brandeburgico Electore." All these events took place in the
lifetime of the father of the first King of Prussia, Frederick William, " the Great Elector.'
72 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Prussia during the French campaign, was the only member
of the Confederation which might have made serious opposi-
tion to the formal consecration of German unity. The
Bavarians had hoped that the new dignity given to the
Germanic chief might be alternately held by Bavaria and
Prussia. But that unpractical idea was waived, and the
King of Bavaria consented to propose, in the name of all
the German princes, that the King of Prussia should adopt
for himself and his heirs the title of German Emperor.
The anniversary of the Prussian Monarchy was, there-
fore, chosen as the day when that offer should be solemnly
accepted. There was to be no crowning and no anointing.
There were to be none of the haughty rites with which the
Hohenzollerns were wont to receive the crown of Prussia.
In no respect did the ceremony resemble a coronation,
although it was an assumption of sovereign dignity more
important than any excepting two of the coronations of
the nineteenth century. In outward aspect it was merely
an imposing military parade. It was the culminating in-
cident in a victorious campaign. No multitude was there
to greet with cheers the consecration of the imperial title.
A conquered city was the scene of the unusual spectacle,
and the only subjects of the new emperor, assembled to
hail him, were men in uniform, not donned to embellish
a pageant, but worn as the working dress in which for
six months they had fought their way through an enemy's
country, and won for their aged leader the primacy of the
fatherland, while smiting to death their hereditary foe.
The feeling which seemed to inspire many of these
warriors was satisfaction that their labours were nearly
over, rather than enthusiasm for the personifier of German
unity. The Prussian has never been loved in Germany.
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 73
The minor tribe, which became a power in Europe under
the military servitude of the great Frederick, cares only
to be feared and obeyed, so Prussia neither expected nor
obtained from its subordinate allies in the conquest of
France those sentimental effusions of which other branches
of the German family are capable. Here to-day the Saxons
and Hessians who had pressed back the French on Metz
from Gravelotte and Saint- Privat, the Bavarians who had
left their hundreds in the burning streets of Bazeilles, the
Wurtemburgers who only the previous month had fought
on the frozen field of Champigny, at the gates of Paris, had
no desire or intention to lose their identity.1 They were
proud of that German unity which had brought France
beneath their feet ; they were willing to proclaim it in
Europe ; they accepted the predominance of the military
genius of Prussia which had led them to victory ; but even
in the supreme hour of triumph over the common enemy of
the fatherland they clung to that idea which is known as
particularism.
From the point of view of conquered France, the exist-
ence of that feeling in the German ranks made no
difference to the harsh significance of the scene. On this
cold grey day the streets of Versailles were lined with
horse and foot, buttoned and bestrapped, after half a year's
hard campaigning, with a stiff smartness which French
troops never display even on a parade-ground in time of
peace. The flag of the Hohenzollerns was flying from the
roof of the palace to denote not only the celebration of the
triumph of Germany over France, but the apotheosis of a
modern reigning family which had survived the old French
1 " Un homme du peuple injurie un des captifs et 1'appelle ' Sale Prussian. ' Celui-ci de
se retourner fierement et de r6pondre : 'Saxon,'" Par ballon monti (Lettres envoye"es de
Paris pendant le siege), par Louis Moland, 1872.
74 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Bourbons and had seen the beginning and end of the
Bonapartes. The past exploits of both those dynasties on
German soil are pictured on the walls and ceilings of the
galleries, which lead to the great hall where the imperial
ceremony was to take place. The Prussian warriors on
their way to it might notice a series of paintings represent-
ing scenes within the memory of their monarch and of his
veterans : the combat of Saalfeld, where the gallant Prince
Louis of Prussia fell four days before Jena ; the capitulation
of Magdeburg, whither a remnant of the Prussian army had
fled from that disastrous field ; Napoleon visiting the tomb
of Frederick the Great ; the Imperial Guard on its return
from Prussia marching into Paris — that same Paris soon to
witness another entry of an Imperial Guard which likewise
came from Prussia. On the upper floor the sumptuous
chambers, through which the German soldiery clanked on
the way to the Galerie des Glaces, is decorated with earlier
memorials of the mastery of France over Germany. In
the Salon d'Hercule is the picture of the operation known
as the passage of the Rhine in 1672, celebrated by Voltaire,1
when Louis XIV. commanded in person, with Conde,
Turenne and Vauban as his lieutenants, and provoked the
coalition of the Germanic league. In the Salon de la
Guerre, the ceiling represents France surrounded by the
victories of Louis the Great, who, sculptured on the wall,
rides in triumph beneath the effigy of Germany succumbing
to superior force.
This is the antechamber of the Gallery of Mirrors, which
was chosen for the great ceremonial. That splendid hall,
planned by Mansar, was painted by Lebrun with subjects
to illustrate the glories of Louis XIV., who from the centre
1 Siicle de Louis XIV., c. x.
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 75
of the gilded roof, habited as Jove, hurls thunderbolts at
Germany and other subject powers. Boileau and Racine
composed the inscriptions, telling of French triumphs over
Germany, which the Germans might read while they
waited for the chieftain with whom they had overrun
France. Seventeen colossal mirrors reflected the uniforms
of every arm of every state of the new empire. The
Emperor-elect, to the strains of a chorale chanted by the
regimental bands, entered the hall, bowing to the black-
robed Lutheran ministers who were to consecrate the
predominance of Protestant Prussia in the palace of the
king who revoked the Edict of Nantes. Only a wall
divides the gallery from the chamber where Louis XIV.
died, leaving trouble in store for the French monarchy, which
on the balcony of this same room received its death sentence
when Louis XVI. and Marie Antoinette in 1789 were
summoned to return to the Tuileries by the Parisian
mob — whose invasion was more formidable than that of
the German hordes come here to-day to avenge some of the
later achievements of the French Revolution. The palace
of Versailles had witnessed many a curious scene in the
lifetime of the old carps within the ponds, on the other side
of the building, among the greensward upon which the
windows of the Gallery of Mirrors look. To-day the ponds
were frozen, and the greensward covered with snow ; but
the crowd in the great hall took no heed of the dazzling
prospect. Their eyes were turned towards William of
Prussia twisting his white moustaches beneath a symbolic
effigy of Germany as it once appeared to victorious France
— an affrighted eagle screaming on a withered tree. Stand-
ing apart from the leaders of the hosts, which had made the
king an emperor, was the minister who prepared the way
76 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
for their victory and changed the note of the German
eagle's cry to one of triumph. Bismarck, pale yet stalwart,
with one hand on the hilt of his sword, had risen from a
bed of pain to assist at the consummation of the work he
had conceived and directed. To witnesses of the scene
his eyes seemed to rest on the noble figure of the Crown
Prince, whom he detested, and who, in spite of him, became
emperor for three short months, and thus gave the title of
empress to the high-minded daughter of Queen Victoria.
During these winter days her humane efforts in distant
Germany to stay the bombardment of Paris had pro-
voked anew the aversion in which Bismarck held the
illustrious pair.1
Near the aged monarch was a brilliant group of thirty
princes of the sovereign houses of Germany. Foremost
among them was his brother, only four years younger than
he, whose son, Frederick Charles, the Red Prince, had
fought on nearly every field from the Moselle to the
Loire. Near him the heir of Saxony, who afterwards
1 " It appeared from some further remarks of the minister that, in his opinion, first Queen
Victoria and then, at her instance, the Crown Princess, and finally the Crown Prince,
persuaded by his consort, will not have Paris bombarded," Busch, Bismarck : Some Secret
Pages of his History. This was on November 19, 1870. On November 24, according to
the same authority, Bismarck again refers to the Princess having delayed the bombardment,
and exultingly quotes her saying about the number of tears he had cost her. Again, on
December 2, " The Crown Prince does not want it, and behind him are the two Victorias,"
and on December 24, ' ' Bucher told us that he had heard from Berlin that the Queen (of
Prussia) and the Crown Princess had become very unpopular owing to their intervention on
behalf of Paris ; and that the Princess struck the table and exclaimed : ' For all that, Paris
shall not be bombarded.'" The bombardment, notwithstanding, began on December 27.
Busch, in his minute daily diary of the siege, when he was living with Bismarck at Versailles,
says not a word about the ceremony in the Galerie des Glaces, except that he went for a walk
while it was going on. Bismarck evidently thought his reptile Boswell unworthy of an
invitation. Several of the details of the historic scene I owe to the vivacious memory of Sir
William Howard Russell, an eye-witness of the ceremony, whose well-merited honours were
appropriately added to at the Coronation of King Edward VII., in recognition of his graphic
and invaluable contributions to the history of Europe in the nineteenth century.
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 77
reigned for almost thirty years, was fresh from bombarding
Paris only the day before. Hard by were regnant princes,
come in person to accept the chieftainship of Prussia,
Grand Duke of Baden, son-in-law of the new emperor,
Grand Duke of Saxe-Weimar, and Duke of Schleswig-
Holstein. All three had had to submit to the insolence of
the Prussian chancellor during these days of his triumph at
Versailles. Saxe-Weimar, who had in his veins Romanoff
blood, did not like it ; but the duke, whom Bismarck dis-
dainfully called the Augustenburger, had his revenge when
his daughter became German Empress. Here was young
Otto of Bavaria, future king of that important state of the
new empire, but fated to be stricken with the malady which
attended his race, when his uncle Luitpold, by his side,
became regent. Here, too, was Augustus of Wurtemberg,
whose judgment, unequal to his valour, had cost the
Prussian guards a battalion at Gravelotte. Most con-
spicuous among the generals, not of princely rank, was
Moltke, of the clean-shaved, finely -chiselled face, the
military genius of the war, whom Bismarck admired
more than he loved ; and Blumenthal, who had opposed,
for strategic reasons, the bombardment of Paris. Near
them was Alvensleben, who opened the fight at Spicheren
and ended it at Mars-la-Tour, and who now wanted
to annex all eastern France right up to the Marne,
Here were Kirchbach, whose hardihood won the first
decisive battle of the war at Worth ; Hartmann, who
commanded the Bavarians at Villiers, beneath the walls of
Paris ; Bothmer, who at Sedan sent word to the King that
the French were ready to capitulate. Every name in the
assembly, with two or three exceptions, had been associated
in the last six months with ruthless slaughter. The civilian
78 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
population of Germany, which had given its thousands to
be slain, was represented by four persons, of whom one
was Delbruck, the minister whom Bismarck had appointed
to show that office in Prussia was not reserved exclusively
for the aristocracy. It was not easy for the powers of
Europe to send ambassadors to salute the new German
Empire, proclaimed in the heart of conquered France.
Three or four foreigners were invited as guests to the
ceremony, including Beauchamp- Walker and Kutusow, the
English and Russian generals, who, in the circle of King
William, had witnessed the battle of Sedan. But the only
accredited envoy present was Odo Russell, who represented
Queen Victoria.1 As he gazed on this scene, the fruit of
bloodshed, suffering and hatred, the diplomatist must have
contrasted it with that of his previous mission. For, only
nine months before, he was at Rome, plotting peacefully
with Manning, on behalf of the Protestant government
of England, to obtain the definition of the dogma of in-
fallibility, which was voted by the Vatican Council, on
the very eve of the war which now had destroyed the
sovereignty of the Pope, the most ancient in Europe, and
had revived here at Versailles a modern simulacrum of the
Holy Roman Empire.
When all was ready, psalms were sung and prayers
recited for the first time beneath the painted ceiling, and a
1 The widow of this eminent diplomatist, Emily, Lady Ampthill, informs me that the
circumstances which led to a diplomatic representative of England being present were as
follows :— Mr Odo Russell was sent on a confidential mission to the German authorities at
Versailles to support England's views on the subject of the Black Sea Treaty. These negotia-
tions lasting till the proclamation of the Empire, the British envoy was specially invited to be
present by the King of Prussia. It was during this mission that Mr Russell won the friend-
ship of Bismarck, who advised the German Emperor to ask for his nomination as British
ambassador at Berlin, where he remained for fourteen years, as Lord Odo Russell and Jx>rd
Ampthill.
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 79
court-chaplain preached a sermon. But, for all these pious
observances, the high-priest of the ceremony was not a
robed ecclesiastic. It was the soldier-minister Bismarck,
who, having made the empire, administered to his aged
master the oath, which consecrated it. Then amid the
waving of swords and of helmets, William of Prussia
was proclaimed German Emperor, and received the
homage of the princes of united Germany ; while above
ithe roll of the drums was heard, not the sound of
jjoy-bells, but the boom of the cannon bombarding
Paris.
A few hours later the Gallery of Mirrors was a blood-
stained hospital. Rows of cots were ranged along the
i walls, and the gilded mirrors reflected the pale and scarred
faces of wounded German soldiers — the victims of the last
sortie from Paris, of the last despairing effort of vanquished
France. This scene in the hall, where the German Empire
had been proclaimed, was an appropriate epilogue to the
drama of German unity, which had been composed and
executed under the direction of a manager whose avowed
instruments of success were " blood and iron." In three
more days the capitulation of Paris was negotiated, and
before the end of January the German flag flew on Mont
Valerien. Nothing then remained in the way of ceremonial
but the triumphal entry of the victorious army into Paris.
The German Emperor made his first public progress amid
circumstances which rarely attend a monarch on his first
appearance after being invested with new sovereign
dignity. It was not amid cheering crowds that the
Emperor rode to the great playground of Paris, at Long-
champ, to review his troops. They alone saluted him ; and
when they left him to march into the centre of the capital,
8o THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
which it was not deemed prudent for him to enter, the
silence of a cowed city denoted that the revenge for Jena
had swiftly followed the vengeance for the exploits of
Louis XIV. which had been accomplished in the palace of
Versailles.
CHAPTER III
(PART n)
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE — Continued
IT now remains to consider what was the importance to
Europe of the constitution of the new German Empire,
and of the events immediately leading up to it, which
were symbolised by the installation of William of Prussia as
emperor, in the ancient palace of the French kings, on the
eve of the occupation of Paris by the army of united
Germany.
Just two months before the significant ceremony at
Versailles, Thomas Carlyle had written : " That noble,
patient, deep and solid Germany should be at length
welded into a nation, and become queen of the continent
instead of vapouring, vain-glorious, gesticulating and over-
sensitive France, seems to me the hopefullest public fact
that has occurred in my time." l Carlyle was not only a
lover of Germany, and the first to make the influence of
German literature felt in Britain. The biographer of Schiller
and the friend of Goethe was also the eulogist of Frederick
the Great and the eager expositor of the Prussian system.
Hence, the possible preponderance of Germany in Europe,
under the lead of Prussia, appealed more to his sympathies
ihan had any event which had occurred, within the realm
of his allegiance, since his birth in 1795 — though that
1 Letter to the Times, November 18, 1870.
82 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
period had witnessed the public policy of Mr Pitt, saving
Europe from the domination of Bonaparte, in spite of the
craven subserviency and merited chastisement of Prussia,
and though it had seen later the colonisation of Australia
and the accession of Queen Victoria.
The hopes of the teutonised Scotsman have not been
fulfilled, although the unification of Germany, consequent
on the German conquest of France, has had results of wide
importance in the history of the world. In some respects
Germany has taken the place which France held on the
continent before the war of 1870. Germany has un-
doubtedly ousted France from its position as the first
military power of Europe, though not as the direct result of
the superiority of its troops on the field of battle. A whole
generation has passed since the last trial of strength. We
know nothing of the respective combatant value of the armies
of France or of Germany in the twentieth century. But we
do know that in an appraisal of two such neighbouring nations
which submit to universal military service, the primacy in
time of peace and the probable supremacy in warfare must
be attributed to the one which has the vaster population.1
At the time of the war of 1870 France was in this respect
practically on an equality with the combination of states
which now compose the German Empire. France had
about two million fewer inhabitants than all those German
territories, but its slight disadvantage in population was
more than made up for by its compactness. The annexa-
i It is interesting to note, in view of the possibilities of a struggle between France and
Germany, and of their present relative conditions of strength, that Napoleon two days before
Jena, when Prussia was crushed by the superior force of French arms, wrote to Frederick
William III. : " Sire, votre Majest6 sera vaincue : . . . ce n'est pas pour 1'Europe une grande
d^couverte d'apprendre que la France est du triple plus populeuse que les Etats de votre
Majest6." Correspondan.ee de Napolton, 12 Octobre 1806.
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 83
tion of Alsace and Lorraine took from France a million
and a half of its inhabitants and gave them to Germany.
If, therefore, the population of the two countries had
progressed at an equal rate, the increased advantage thus
obtained by Germany would not have produced an over-
whelming superiority over France in armed force. But in
the generation which has elapsed, the birthrate of France
has been so feeble that, even with a considerable immigra-
tion from Italy, Switzerland and Belgium, it has barely
made up for the population of the provinces lost in 1871;
while in Germany the natality has so increased that, in spite
of a very large emigration which has had no counterpart
in France, the German Empire has entered the twentieth
century with seventeen and a half million more inhabitants
than those of the French Republic. France, therefore, in a
duel with Germany, uncomplicated by alliances on either side,
would enter upon the conflict against overwhelming odds.
The superiority of numbers achieved by united Germany
has not been employed merely as a warlike safeguard
against French reprisals. The increased population of
that German Empire, which was consolidated on the
battlefields of France, has developed the arts of peace
with such enterprise that Germany boasts to be the greatest
industrial nation which ever existed on the continent of
Europe. In commerce, as in arms, France has had to
yield precedence to its neighbour and conqueror. But
commercial and military supremacy are not the sole
elements of international influence. In the history of the
world, from the days of Pericles and of Augustus, they
have often been conspicuous features in the communities
which have been paramount among nations. Yet the
position of Germany in Europe at the dawn of the
84 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
twentieth century proves that they alone do not suffice.
They have not made Germany "the Queen of the
Continent," as Carlyle portended, in language which Bis-
marck and his satellites found perfect.1 If France has been
dethroned, an interregnum has ensued, and while its
restoration is the desire of many people of Europe,
Germany is a pretender without hereditary title to the
vacant throne and without a single adherent beyond its
own frontiers.
There can be no doubt that France and its capital have
not the position in Europe which they held before the war
of 1870. This is not the place in which to inquire if the
form of government adopted by the French after the battle
of Sedan has had anything to do with their failure to
regain their international influence. All that need be said
is, that after France had been crushed as a military power
in 1815, its revival as a moral and intellectual force in
Europe was rapid, and, what is more remarkable, it soon
recovered a large measure of its political authority among
nations, in spite of changes in its own regime. The period
which saw the restored legitimate dynasty give way to the
revolutionary Monarchy of July, only half a generation
after worse disasters than those of the campaign of [870,
was one worthy to compare with the Grand Siecle, in the
sway which France held over the mind and imagination of
1 Dr Busch considered that Carlyle's letter to the Times, which seems to have reached
Bismarck at Versailles only on December I2th, 1870, was as good as anything written by his
own hand for the reptile press. " It would be impossible for us to improve upon it," he says,
"an excellent letter which we must submit to the people of Versailles in the Afoniteur." In
addition to the epithets in the passage quoted above, which Carlyle applied to France, he de-
scribed the French nation as insolent, rapacious, insatiable, unappeasable, delirious, miserable,
contemptible, mendacious, sordid. On the other hand, he described Bismarck as "patient,
grand and successful. " These flowers from the Prussian agency in Cheyne Row in no wise
mollified Bismarck's hatred for England, during or after the Franco-German war.
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 85
the civilised world. Paris, which was the unrivalled
intellectual capital of Europe under Louis Philippe, became,
under the Second Empire, also a political and diplomatic
centre, foremost in importance whenever international
affairs were in question.
Paris has not that same high position at the beginning of
the twentieth century ; but no part of its lost prestige has
been transferred to the capital of the German Empire. At
the time of the Franco-German war the population of
Berlin was not half that of Paris. In thirty years its
population has more than doubled, while that of Paris, in
spite of the great influx of inhabitants from the provinces,
has increased at the rate of only forty per cent. But
though Berlin is now a more populous place than was
Paris at the zenith of its prosperity, it is not a centre of
international influence. The capital of the German Empire
is not, in the eyes of the nations of Europe, a more
important centre than Vienna, which it has outstripped in
population, or St Petersburg or Rome ; it remains inferior
to Paris in spite of the diminished relative importance of
that city. Its geographical situation, far from the great
thoroughfares of Europe, except that which leads to Russia,
is not sufficient to account for this. There have been cities
even in Germany, mere villages in point of size compared
with Berlin, remote from international highways, in days
when means of communication were difficult, which have
exercised an influence on the civilised world, and that
without the advantages which military strength and
commercial prosperity have always given to a community.
Such a city was seen in Germany a hundred years ago.
The whole duchy of Saxe-Weimar at the end of the
eighteenth century had not one-ninth of the number of
86 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
inhabitants which Berlin contains at the beginning of the
twentieth. The capital of the little state was a modest
country town, and yet it did more to spread German
influence in the world, in thirty years of war and invasion,
than the great capital of the united German Empire has
effected in thirty years of prosperous peace. Schiller came
to Weimar from Wurtemberg, Goethe from Frankfort,
Herder from Prussia, Wieland from Suabia. Thence,
under the wise protection of an unwarlike petty potentate
they sent forth messages to the world which, in a period
disastrous to German arms, gave higher prestige to Germany
than all the conquests of Frederick the Great, who ignored
the real genius of the fatherland, regarding it as a barrack-
yard or a recruiting ground, and importing from France his
poets and philosophers. In other parts of politically divided
Germany illustrious Germans were proving that true
German unity, which added immortal glory to the German
name, had nothing to do with military success or federal
combination. Immanuel Kant was pursuing his calm
speculations in the dark days of Valmy and Jemappes,
having stepped to the first rank of European philosophers
when his sovereign, Frederick the Great, was taking counsel
of D'Alembert, adulating and squabbling with Voltaire or
making Maupertuis president of his Prussian Academy.
Beethoven, who belonged to a younger generation, com-
posed many of the divine melodies, which he never heard,
when Prussia was the feudatory of France. Arndt, who
was a year older, was inspired by Jena and the subsequent
invasion of Germany by France, to pen his patriotic pam-
phlets and lyrics,1 which more than the writings of any one
1 e.g. Der Rhein, Deutschlarufs Strom aber nicht DeutschlancTs Grente, and Was ist des
Deutschen Vaterland, which was the national hymn of united Germany in the war of 1870.
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 87
man encouraged unity of sentiment among German-speaking
peoples ; yet his patriotism was of a kind so little appre-
ciated in Prussia that after the peace of 1815 he was
deprived of his civil rights for twenty years.
The influence which Germany has had in the world
attained its height in the years when German political
unity seemed a chimerical dream, when German industry
supplied only local needs, and when German arms inspired
no dread. In England, when Frederick the Great was
making Prussia a military power, the name of Kant was
scarcely known at Oxford, and the cultured society of
London was unaware that Lessing was the foremost critic
of the age. The considerable trace which German
philosophy and literature have left on English thought and
letters dates from the generation succeeding the French
Revolution, when all Germany had submitted to Napoleon,
and when Prussia, having been thrust back to the rank of a
second-rate power, was reinstated only by the aid of the
allied armies of Europe. Then it was that Coleridge, and
less known but more profound thinkers, began the
Germanising work which Carlyle made popular with his
thoroughness and rugged energy. Germany still retains
certain traditions of philosophy, of criticism and of research.
But in the thirty years which have elapsed since its political
unity was proclaimed at Versailles, it has produced few writers
in any one of those branches of human knowledge whose
names are quoted as authorities, in the sense in which that
title was accorded to illustrious German workers in the days
before Bismarck had accomplished his more practical task.
France, more than England in some respects, fell under
German influence before its conquest by Germany in 1870.
At the end of the Napoleonic epoch the French, disillusioned
88 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
and wearied of the philosophy of the Encyclopaedists, which
had led to the Revolution and the revolutionary wars,
longed for a vague reposeful ideal. Madame de Stael
in her book on Germany, published in 1810, but sup-
pressed by Napoleon, moved them to seek it beyond
the Rhine. From this point started two different currents
in France — which both sprang from German influence — the
romantic movement in literature and the metaphysical
movement led by Victor Cousin who Germanised Plato. For
France, Germany was a land of gentle melancholy, where
dreaming philosophers consorted with blond and sentimental
maidens. That epoch came to an end with the interchange
of lyrical insults between Becker and Alfred de Musset,1 on
the subject of the Rhine, in the year when Frederick
William III., the victim of Jena, died. From 1840 France
regarded Germany with unsympathetic eyes, but continued
to cultivate its learning. It was during this second period
when Renan, steeped in German exegesis at Saint Sulpice,
took the step which made him the leader of a popular
school, and when Taine, who influenced nobler minds, never
let a day pass without reading Hegel. The influence of
the great German tone-poets on French music ranges over
a wider period, from the school which adopted Bach as its
master, long after his death, to the less melodious disciples
of Wagner, who, in his lifetime, followed him only in his
eccentricities, and who still continue to perplex unlearned
lovers of tunefulness.
But Wagner, though he lived for twelve years after the
proclamation of the German Empire, was born in the year
of Leipzig, and all his greatest work was composed in the
1 Becker's Rheinlied, "Sie sollen ihn nicht haben," and Mussel's "Nous 1'avons eu votre
Rhin Allemand."
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 89
days when German political unity was a dim theory. The
vogue in France, at the end of the nineteenth century, of
his music, which before the war provoked bitter hostility
in Paris, shows that the loss of German influence over
the French is not due to the resentment of a vanquished
people. At the dawn of the twentieth century that patriotic
rancour lingers only in the hearts of the older generation
which saw the invasion. Even on the morrow of the war
the French were willing to take lessons from a victorious
enemy. The reorganisation of their army, up to a certain
point, was carried out on German lines, and educational
reformers did not lose sight of the scholastic superiority of
their conquerors. One notable effect of the German con-
quest on French education is the assiduity with which the
study of the German language has been pursued in France.
Not only is it a more popular subject of voluntary study
than English in the secondary schools : for certain
examinations German is compulsory, while English is only
alternative with Italian or Spanish.1 This premium put on
the acquisition of an unpractical language is not a sign of
French desire to drink at the sources of German erudition,
undiluted by translation. It is a relic of the days of
revengeful hope when Frenchmen thought it would be
agreeable for their sons to be able to address the citizens
1 For the " Baccalaure'at de 1'enseignement secondaire moderne " German is compulsory, but
Spanish or Italian may be substituted for English. German alone is compulsory for the
entrance examinations for the Ecole polytechnique and the Ecole militaire de Saint-Cyr. and
also for the " Certificat d'aptitude au professorat des classes etementaires de 1'enseignement
secondaire." The only public examination in which English is compulsory is that for the
Ecole navale. M. Liard, the vice-rector of the Acade'mie de Paris, the permanent head of
French secondary education, informs me that in November 1902, in the secondary schools
(lyce'es et colleges) 47,000 pupils were learning German, and only 26,000 English. The same
eminent authority tells me that, in his opinion, this zeal for the study of German has no effect
whatever upon the young generation, as a philosophic influence. The language is learned
solely for ' ' practical " purposes,
90 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
of Berlin in their own tongue after the occupation of that
capital by the army of France. Although this strange
outcome of the vanished purpose of vengeance causes a
large proportion of the youth of France to struggle with
the subtleties of German syntax, German influence is less
marked in French education than when it was imparted
second-hand by Cousin, Renan or Taine. Almost the
only German author of united Germany who has influenced
French thought is Nietzche, and his rare disciples study
him in the French versions of his uneven work, where they
may read that the most regrettable result of the conquest
of France by Germany was the erroneous idea that German
culture was going to profit from the victory, consecrated by
the proclamation of the empire.
This observation points to the course of the decadence of
German influence, under the united Empire which was welded
by the policy of " blood and iron." All nations in the last
period of the nineteenth century have become tainted with
materialism, to the great detriment of culture and learning.
The German people more than any other has been injured
by it, because the genius of Germany, which had its luxuriant
springtime at the end of the eighteenth century, is essenti-
ally idealistic. German philosophy, poetry and music is
of such a nature that it cannot flourish in an atmosphere
of materialism, military or commercial. Bismarck, whose
ideas on humanism were those of a serjeant-major who had
become a company-promoter,1 transformed by his policy
the character and the aspirations of the Germans. He
1 Bismarck's opinions on this subject were those of British materialists who wish to do
away with the classical basis of secondary education : " I cannot understand why people take
so much trouble with Latin and Greek. It must be merely because learned men do not
wish to lessen the value of what they have themselves so laboriously acquired," Busch, Some
Secret Pages, VoL I. c. viii.
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 91
Prussianised Germany by enchaining it to the militarism
which is now the basis of life in the Empire. All the other
features, which are said to constitute the greatness of united
Germany, are importations from beyond the frontiers of the
fatherland. The colonial enterprise of the Empire is a
manifest and unsuccessful imitation of the expansion of
England ; its naval policy, which may be more effective, is
likewise copied from England ; the new development of its
commerce and industry has for its model that of the United
States of America. When the centenary of Bismarck's
birth in 1815 is celebrated, those who admire his almost
single-handed work will perhaps be able to boast that the
political regenerator of Germany made it henceforth im-
probable that German soil should ever again produce a
Kant or a Hegel, a Lessing, a Schiller or a Goethe, a Mozart
or a Wagner.
There are other consequences of the consolidation of
the German Empire under the hegemony of Prussia which
may be accounted as beneficial. From the day when the
Emperor William received the imperial title at Versailles
peace has prevailed among the Christian powers of
Europe. Though Russia has waged war upon Turkey
and though the Balkan powers have come to blows,
the peace of Europe has been less disturbed even than
in the period of repose which followed the downfall
of Napoleon. For between Waterloo and the Crimean
campaign there took place the French expedition to Spain
in 1823 to strengthen the power of the Bourbons, the French
intervention in the Low Countries in 1831, out of which
arose the kingdom of Belgium, and the reduction of
northern Italy by Austria. Although each of those
operations was provoked by a revolutionary movement
92 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
they were none the less breaches of the peace of Europe.
The settlement of 1871 sated the ambition of Prussia, which
in the previous seven years had produced three European
wars. It likewise disabled France as the chief military
power of Europe, and the warmest lover of that country
cannot doubt that the French victorious would, under the
restless guidance of Louis Napoleon, have turned their
emboldened ardour to other fields of conquest. The
proclamation of the German Empire at Versailles thus
marked the opening of a new era of peace, but a peace
so prepared for war that it has strained the resources of
Europe more severely than the most costly campaigns of
past ages.
In one other respect the foundation of the German
Empire may be deemed to have had consequences advan-
tageous to Europe. At the hour when German literature
and philosophy was exercising the most potent influence
on European thought it was constantly said that no political
influence ever emanated from Germany, as did the doctrine
of the Revolution from France or the theory of repre-
sentative government from England. A power has arisen
in Germany, the direct product of the imperial office vested
in the hands of the Hohenzollerns, which has removed that
reproach. The Emperor William II., having inherited the
imperial dignity almost immediately from the monarch who
received it at Versailles, has so adorned it that he has
strengthened monarchical sentiment in Europe even be-
yond the frontiers of his imperial domain. Across the
Vosges his neighbours, whom he may not visit for fear of
reopening an ancient wound, sometimes reflect that if they
had such a prince to personify their government they might
regain the position which was taken from them by the
THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE 93
armies of his grandfather. The Emperor William in his
military zeal displays qualities which are the appropriate
heritage of the successor of Frederick the Great on the
throne of Prussia. He also evinces a tendency to idealise,
which shows him to be imbued with the noblest traditions
of greater Germany. But his faculty of popularising the
monarchical idea, even beyond the boundaries of Germany,
does not come from his ancestors in the male line. This
beneficent gift the German Emperor illustrates as a scion
of the royal family of England.
BOOK III
THE CORONATION OF QUEEN VICTORIA
CHAPTER I
THE INAUGURATION OF A NEW ERA
I
THE two great ceremonies which we have been con-
templating were landmarks of high importance in
European history. The Coronations of Queen
Victoria and of her illustrious son, to which we now turn,
were events of world-wide significance — the one as the
inauguration of a new era of scientific inventions, which,
emanating from England, changed the conditions of human
society and at the same time enabled the British Empire
under the British crown to expand in every quarter of the
i globe ; the other as the consecration of the imperial idea,
developed by the British race during the previous reign.
Germany, under the steel-clad empire, proclaimed in an
hour of victory, has abdicated the wider realm of moral
authority in which it once set its mark on the progress of
human civilisation. It now, with less sentimental aspira-
tions, sends its ships of war and of commerce all over the
world, in pursuit of what is called a mondial policy. But,
though it has entered into successful rivalry with England
in carrying its trade beyond the seas, and has also annexed
tracts of savage territory for commercial purposes, there is
no prospect of distant portions of the earth being effectively
Germanised. Two million German settlers who have gone
to the United States, since the empire was founded, to
<5 97
98 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
rear up generations bound to disown the language as well
as the flag of the fatherland, are a standing proof that
Germany will never be a colonising power, whatever the
artificial encouragement given by its rulers.
Napoleon Bonaparte, before he crowned himself Emperor
of the French, had led the soldiers of the Revolution into
Asia and into Africa, where the way of his ambition to
establish an Oriental empire was barred by British arms.
But the vendor to the American government of Louisiana,
which acquisition almost doubled the area of the United
States, had no sense of colonial expansion. The colonial
enterprises which France has essayed, since his time, can-
not be traced to his influence, and, unlike the institutions
which he founded, they have not been effective. French
patriotism since the Revolution has taken the form of an
ardent clinging to the soil of France. Hence, the extensive
foreign dependencies acquired by the French, whether in
temperate or in tropical zones, are regarded by them not as
places of permanent domicile or of settlement for their
citizens, but of temporary exile for soldiers and function-
aries. Without these official classes, even in Algeria, the
French would form a minority of the European population
in that magnificent French possession at the gates of France.
French colonial expansion is a question which chiefly con-
cerns custom-house officers and map-makers. It is of
international importance, because its principal aim is the
exclusion of the products of rival nations from vast regions
of Africa and Asia. But the spheres of French commercial
traffic, so created, do not tend to establish a domain beyond
the seas in any respect comparable with the British
Empire. At the dawn of the twentieth century the French
possessions in Africa, according to their claims on paper,
THE INAUGURATION OF A NEW ERA 99
are of wider area than those of England ; but the only
portion of the globe outside Europe where French speak-
ing people are rooted to the soil, and are multiplying upon
it, is under the British crown in the Canadian settlements of
ancient France.1
Another point which distinguishes the assumption of
imperial dignity by Napoleon Bonaparte and William of
Hohenzollern from the coronations of Queen Victoria and
of King Edward VII., is that the ceremonies attending the
former were the immediate result and the consecration of
the triumph of armed force. The coronation of Napoleon
took place between two campaigns. The laurel crown which
he put on his head was a trophy won on a score of battle-
fields, from Castiglione to Marengo. The elevation of
the Emperor William was the consequence of a series
of wars profitable to Prussia, and the proclamation of
his imperial title was the culminating incident in the last of
1 Since this passage was written the following corroboration of it was published, from the
pen of a distinguished Frenchman, Dr Adrien Loir, of the Pasteur Institute, Paris, who went
to South Africa on a scientific mission. It appeared in the Temps of February 15, 1903, in
one of a series of articles written in Rhodesia, which cannot be read without satisfaction by
Englishmen, constituting as they do a gratifying testimony to the progress of that great terri-
tory. Dr Loir is a traveller familiar with many oversea possessions of England and of France,
and he has to confess that what he says of Tunisia, a day's voyage from Marseilles, can also
be said of distant Madagascar. The quotation from his letter, though long, is worth putting
on record, as it shows why the British Empire, in its expansion, has now nothing to fear from
one of the two chief nations of the continent, its great colonial rival of the eighteenth cen-
tury :— " J'ai v6cu dans une de nos colonies, voisine de la France ; j'y 6tais venu apres avoir fait
un sejour de quatre ann^es en Australie. J'arrivais avec la ferme intention de m'e'tablir dans
ce pays fran9ais et d'y concentrer, en meme temps que mes occupations, mes inte'rets, mon
oyer, ma vie et tout ce qui faisait mon existence. Anime' par 1'esprit de colonisation du pays
que je venais de quitter, je croyais retrouver le mSme enthousiasme dans cette Tunisie qui, a
juste litre, est appele'e la perle des colonies fran9aises. Je comptais trouver des colons et des
fonctionnaires partageant mes sentiments et travaillant de tous leurs efforts a 1'avenir de la
contr^e dans laquelle ils s'e'taient transplanted. Je n'ai pas tard6 a 6prouver une re'elle decep-
tion presque a mon arrive'e. Au lieu de cette entente, de cette homoge'ne'itg de sentiments, je
rencontrai des fonctionnaires ennuye"s, des colons moroses, des militaires avouant qu'ils ne
venaient dans le pays que pour avoir des campagnes a leur actif ; tous paraissaient s'entendre
pour d^nigrer le pays et ne songeaient qu'au moment de retourner en France."
ioo THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
them, amid the sound of battle, before the Germans and their
vanquished foes had ceased killing one another. These
solemnities moreover, and the crises which they signalised,
were each the work of one man, by birth unconnected with
dynastic lineage. The first was a soldier of fortune, who by
his military genius turned the great movement of the French
Revolution to his own profit. The other was a statesman
who revived, and, with the aid of armies, organised the
principle of German political unity, for the benefit of a
royal house which he served and aggrandised.
Neither personal nor vicarious ambition has had any
bearing on the assumption of the British crown by those
who have worn it since the wars of the Roses ; nor since that
epoch has it been affected by the exploits of armies against
a foreign foe. The wide domain which Queen Victoria
inherited, as the heir of the British monarchy, and which she
handed on with its bounds largely extended, was no doubt
partly the fruit of conquest. But the consolidation of her
dominions, into an empire of unexampled area and splendour,
has been due much more to the peaceful enterprise of the
British race than to its military prowess. It is true that,
excepting the great Australian continent, there are few of
our possessions which have not been acquired or enlarged
or kept by armed force. During nearly ninety years the
armies of England have only once been in conflict with those
of a European power ; but rarely has one of those years
passed without a British force being actively engaged
beyond the seas in defence of the Empire. When King
Edward was crowned we had only just ended our gravest
colonial war since the revolt of the American colonies.
So also, soon after the coronation of Queen Victoria the
protection of our Indian frontier led to a bloody campaign,
THE INAUGURATION OF A NEW ERA 101
which included the greatest military disaster sustained by
England in the nineteenth century, when an entire army
perished in the Khyber Pass. But those incidents of a
great dominion, scattered all over the world, with boundaries
touching those of other peoples, do not greatly modify the
truth of the proposition that the British Empire is a monu-
ment of peaceful development.
Again, the crowning of Queen Victoria is a notable land-
mark in the history of the world, not only because of the
expansion of the British Empire which took place in her
reign, but also because her accession coincided with the
moment when her realm of England began to send forth
inventions, or applications of scientific discoveries, which
were soon to transform the conditions of human society all
over the globe. Her contemporaries were a privileged
generation, if it be a privilege to witness in a lifetime social
and material changes vaster than those which had been
effected in the three previous centuries.
When Sir Robert Peel was sent for from Italy to form
the short-lived ministry which preceded that which Queen
Victoria found in office on her accession, the statesman
was unable to travel from Rome to England much more
quickly than Augustine might have journeyed when he
visited the Isle of Thanet in 597, had not the Benedictine
missionary halted on his way to enjoy Gallic hospitality at
Aries and at Autun. It took Sir Robert Peel as long
to come from Rome to London in 1834 as it took the
messengers of Clement VII. to reach Cardinal Campeggio
at Whitehall, after his arrival in 1528 to try the divorce of
Catherine of Arragon. The distance between London and
Rome the year that Queen Victoria died could be travelled
in forty-one hours, an hour less than Her Majesty's mails
102 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
took to go from London to Edinburgh when she came to
the throne, and the time which Sir Robert Peel occupied
in travelling from Rome to London now suffices for a
journey from England to the Pacific shore of our Dominion
of Canada.1
II
No particular date is associated in men's minds with the
great revolution which took place when means of communi-
cation were accelerated by mechanical agencies. Yet it
marks an epoch which, in the history of the human race,
will rank in importance as high as the Renaissance, and
infinitely higher than the French Revolution. For this
reason the year 1838, when Queen Victoria assumed the
crown of England, deserves to be signalised as a conven-
tional date, marking an epoch more distinctly than 1453,
when the Turks took Constantinople, or 1789, when the
Bastile fell. The figure of the young queen at that epoch
seems to stand as an emblem of the new order of things
which her coronation inaugurated. In all the great crises
which have interrupted the unity of the world's history, there
never was a change effected with such sudden rapidity as
that produced by the application of scientific discoveries to
1 When William IV. dismissed Lord Melbourne on November 15, 1834, a messenger was
sent post-haste to Rome to summon Sir Robert Peel, who, hurrying back, arrived only on
December 9. In the same interval of time it would now be possible, and even easy, to travel
from England to Vancouver and back if the Atlantic passages were good and special trains
were organised between New York and Montreal, and then over the Canadian- Pacific line.
As far back as 1891 the "China Mail" was once sent over this route in 21^ days from
Yokohama to St Martin's-le-Grand, the time occupied between Vancouver and London being
10 days and 21 hours. But in this case the transit from New York to London was unusually
slow, taking 7 days and 5 hours, whereas the journey from Vancouver to New York took only
3 days and 16 hours. The time-bills of January 1838, six months after Queen Victoria's
accession, announced that a mail-coach left the Bull-and-Mouth, St Martin's-le-Grand, every
evening at 8, arriving at Edinburgh the next day but one at 2.23 P.M.
THE INAUGURATION OF A NEW ERA 103
means of communication. The children born when Queen
Victoria was a child received their first impressions in an
old world, of which the calm was disturbed only by
occasional political convulsions, by pestilence or by war-
fare, and in which the progress of civilisation slowly
transformed by invisible degrees the outward aspect of
things. The children born during the infancy of Queen
Victoria's eldest son, our present King, never knew any
other world than that which, in a more developed stage,
we have before our eyes at the beginning of his reign.
They grew up in the restless age of the railway, of the
steam-engine, and of the utilisation of electric force.
The other great revolutions in the history of mankind
were slow in their effects. Of Christianity it need only be
said that it had been founded for centuries before its results,
social or material, were visible. The Renaissance, which
commenced before the earliest date ever assigned to it,
though less slow in its influence than Christianity, was not
a rapid movement. The flight of the Greek scholars,
before the inroad of the Turks, from the shores of the
Bosphorus to Italy, where already the revival of the
antique had quickened the artistic instinct of the Floren-
tines, opened up the learning of the ancients to a Europe
obscured by the darkness of the Middle Ages. At the
same moment printing was invented by Gutenberg to be
the instrument of diffusing the new learning. Yet, in spite
of these simultaneous forces, the Renaissance was in process
for a hundred years before it began to stamp its impress on
the life of Europe. The splendours of the Italian schools
of painting, the sumptuous domestic architecture of the
French, the astronomical researches of Copernicus, the
finding of the Western Continent and of the ocean route
io4 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
to India, by English, Spanish and Portuguese navigators,
the spread of Greek philosophy, the Reformation in England
and in Germany, altered the conditions of human existence
or expanded the limits of human understanding in a manner
unexampled in the history of the world. But while these
great phenomena were being produced, generations passed
away. The movement began before the wars of the
Roses in England, when France was throwing off English
domination and struggling with its own feudatories. It
did not come to fruition till half of the sixteenth century
had gone, when united France was soon to pass from the
feeble hands of the last of the Valois to the powerful rule
of the first of the Bourbons, when the Empire had seen the
end of the ambitious reign of Charles V., and when a still
mightier monarch was showing that in England the instru-
ment of directing a great movement to the glory, honour
and welfare of the realm, was a woman on the throne, dux
feminafacti.
Three centuries later another queen revived that tradi-
tion of Elizabeth. The movement which developed in the
reign of Victoria differed, however, from the Renaissance
in three important particulars. It was swift in its effect ; it
emanated from England instead of being imported to our
shores from the continent ; and, whatever benefits it con-
ferred on mankind, it did not beautify the world as did
the movement out of which, at various stages, sprang
Brunelleschi's dome by the Arno and Philibert Delorme's
towers by the Loire, which filled the canvasses of Dtirer
and of Leonardo, or guided the chisel of Michel Angelo.
The French Revolution, compared with the Renaissance
or with the change of things dating from the accession of
Queen Victoria, can no longer be classed as a great move-
THE INAUGURATION OF A NEW ERA 105
ment in the history of the world. It was swift in its action
but not durable in its effect. As we have seen, had it not
been organised by Napoleon, and by him imposed on
Europe at the point of the bayonet, its place in history
might probably have been only that of a political and
social upheaval, which began in philosophy and ended in
anarchy. The real revolution which has taken place in
France is that unrecognised one which British engineers
and contractors carried across the channel in the first years
of the reign of Victoria. The chief opponent of railways
in France, who delayed their serious introduction for some
years, was M. Thiers, the minister of Louis Philippe. He
was reproached with lack of prescience. But perhaps the
ardent evangelist of 1789, always jealous for the tradition
of the Revolution, then in its prime, foresaw that it was
fated to be overshadowed by the new order of things,
which would bring into the modern state conditions un-
dreamed of by the framers of the Declaration of the
Rights of Man. France still claims to be the land of the
Revolution ; but its revolutionaries in the twentieth
century, who constitute the most compact party in the
Third Republic, of which they are the chief defence, are
the socialists. They repudiate the individualism of the
French Revolution. They have no hereditary connection
with any of the controversies which came to a head in
1789, although they burden their arguments with irrelevant
references to the violent events which followed that date.
They are the issue not of the French Revolution but of
the industrial development which commenced fifty years
later. It is still the fashion of French politicians to appeal
to eighteenth-century personages, just as the Romans, in
their rhetorical exercises, used to invoke the immortal gods
106 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
long after they had ceased to believe in them. Neverthe-
less, it is certain that at the present hour the theories
of the encyclopaedists, and the actions of Danton and
Robespierre, have less influence on French daily life than
the inventions of the Stephensons and the enterprise of
Brassey. When, before the advent of those agents of the
new civilisation, Jules Simon, who was five years older
than Queen Victoria, and Renan, who was four years
younger, came to Paris by diligence from their native pro-
vinces, the scenes of their boyhood, then distant several
days' journey from the capital, retained their ancient
characteristics. The Revolution had passed over France
like a whirlwind, uprooting many political and fiscal institu-
tions. But the costume, the language, the manners and
the isolation of the country people remained unchanged.
The half century which succeeded the abolition of privilege
produced less effect on the lives of French provincials than
the subsequent twenty years which followed the covering
of France by a network of railways.1
Ill
The revolution which was beginning when Queen
Victoria was crowned was not only rapid in movement, but
permanent in result Under its influence manners and
customs, which were as old as human civilisation, dis-
appeared eternally. One ancient craft, of amiable associa-
tion in all ages and in all lands — the art of letter-writing
— received its inevitable doom the year of the Queen's
accession, when a pamphlet on " Post Office Reform " was
1 " En r£alit£ la Revolution avait 6t6 non avenue pour le monde ou je vivais," Renan,
Souvenirs tf Enfance.
THE INAUGURATION OF A NEW ERA 107
published by Rowland Hill. This discerning innovator
saw, what was not detected by many of his contemporaries,
that rapidity of written communication was the corollary
of rapidity of locomotion, and that the newly invented
railways would develop a cheap postal service to a degree
which seemed fabulous at the time. That which appeared
obvious to the subsequent generation was not so to the
subjects of Queen Victoria in her coronation year. Lively
speculations were rife as to the consequences of the nascent
railway system, brought into being at the moment when
the accession of the young queen was making the dominant
note of the English mind one of hopeful, and sometimes
fantastic, expectancy. It was seriously predicted that the
facilities provided by railways for the transport of
passengers would diminish commercial correspondence, or
that men of business would cease to rely upon written
communication for the despatch of important affairs at a
distance, when by taking the train they could quickly con-
clude them by word of mouth.1 But the more prescient
theory of Rowland Hill was accepted, and so swiftly put
into practice, that eighteen months after the Queen's
Coronation the uniform penny rate became the postal tariff
for letters between all places in the United Kingdom.
The revolutionary character of that reform, which was
soon, in modified shape, to be adopted by all the civilised
nations of the world, can be appreciated by a superficial
glance at the postal system of the United Kingdom in
1 " It might have been expected that the facilities afforded by railroads for the conveyance
of passengers would tend to lessen the amount of epistolary intercourse along the lines, as it
is of course evident that communication by writing will not take place in all those cases where
the parties can travel themselves for the execution of business," The British Almanac of the
Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge (Chairman, The Right Hon. Lord Brougham),
io8 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
1838. Although a penny post for the delivery of letters in
London, Westminster and Southwark had been established
in the seventeenth century, the metropolitan tariff stood at
twopence when Queen Victoria was crowned. For the
provinces there was a sliding scale according to distance.
Under it in 1838, a letter written on a single sheet was
conveyed thirty miles for sixpence, a hundred and twenty
miles for ninepence, and three hundred miles for a shilling.
Only a minute proportion of the letters for town or country
were prepaid, the postal charges usually falling on the
recipients. The heavy tariff for country letters was to
some extent evaded by the privilege of " franking,"
accorded to the holders of certain offices, whose signature
on the face of a letter enabled it to be delivered without
fee in any part of the kingdom. Certain high officials were
permitted to send and receive letters without limit as to
number or weight ; while the members of both Houses of
Parliament could receive fifteen and send ten letters daily.
The privilege was not limited to their own correspondence :
those who enjoyed this right were allowed to exempt from
postal dues any one's letters franked with their sign manual.
So important was this licence, and so serviceable was it to
the friends of peers and of high functionaries, and to the
constituents of members of parliament, that in the official
annuals of the year of Queen Victoria's coronation the
" List of persons privileged under the General Franking
Act " was printed as a piece of useful information, just as
the names of the Agents-General for the Colonies are given
in similar handbooks in the year of the coronation of King
Edward VII. Thus, until after the accession of Queen
Victoria, when the conveyance of a letter from London
to Exeter cost tenpence, and to Carlisle thirteenpence, or
THE INAUGURATION OF A NEW ERA 109
else involved the tiresome solicitation of a frank from a
"privileged person," the restrictions in force were pro-
hibitive to correspondence, excepting in cases where writers
had something of importance or of interest to communicate.
But before the days of railways, when a journey was to
most people a rare event and even inland travel was
arduous, leisure was abundant in the classes which could
afford the luxury of exchanging letters on subjects uncon-
nected with business. Therefore friends at a distance,
whether inmates of cities or quiet dwellers in the country,
were wont to acquaint one another, by familiar epistles,
with details of their daily life and surroundings. So habitual
was the practice, that it was not laid aside amid the fatigues
and interesting adventures which then attended a foreign
tour, whatever the difficulties of transmitting correspond-
ence from abroad. The consequence was that private
individuals, few of whom were conscious of the posses-
sion of literary talent, squires and soldiers, gentlewomen
and ecclesiastics, statesmen and merchants, became without
knowing it the authors of historical documents of the highest
value. Thousands of these are still fading or mildewing in
the chests and closets of old manor houses. A certain number
have been brought to light and enable us to trace day by
day and hour by hour the lives, public and private, of those
who have gone before us. A few of them, when published,
have given fame to writers, who died without knowing that
they had any other title to respect than that of being
peaceable citizens or notable housewives.1
Whatever the fate of these domestic manuscripts of the
1 Madame de Se'vigne' is the leading example of one who has taken a place among the
most illustrious writers of all ages, without ever having written a book or having attempted to
write one, entirely by the literary merits of familiar letters, never intended for public view.
no THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
past, their confection ceased when in the track of the
railway, changing all the old conditions of existence,
came cheap postage which soon made the receipt and
expedition of letters a mere matter of family, social or
business routine. Some of those who had been brought up
in the gracious old tradition maintained for a season its
practice, and even handed it on to their children to continue
it for a generation. But letter- writing as a fine art was
doomed. An end had come to the one branch of literary
composition which had been unaffected by the invention of
printing, and which had been inspired by the same motives,
and created by the same mental process, from the days
when Cicero quitted his metaphysic and his oratory to
describe to his brother Quintus, or to his friend Atticus,
the last phases of republican Rome, till the days when Mr
Pope neglected his couplets to discourse to Dr Atterbury
on the daily life of the early Georgian era, or when
Horace Walpole bequeathed to Miss Berry a legacy of
letters to be by her hands delivered to the generation
which saw the new order of things. Whatever commercial
benefit mankind has derived from the application to means
of inter-communication of steam, and of electricity, which
quickly followed the other, it is perhaps a matter for rejoic-
ing that the utility of these forces was not discovered sooner.
Their employment has not elevated the standard of human
intercourse in one great branch which is as old as the use of
written characters, and which in all civilised communities the
noblest spirits of each succeeding age had cultivated. The
world would be poorer if Cowper had relieved his melan-
choly by running with his hares to a telegraph office at
Olney to despatch messages to Lady Hesketh, or if Madame
de Sevigne" had written to her daughter a daily postcard
THE INAUGURATION OF A NEW ERA in
illuminated with a view of the Chateau of Grignan. Its
destiny might have been changed if Saint Paul had been
able to send from Philippi his sublime Epistles to the Cor-
inthians by telephone. For it is certain that, had that
instrument been invented, the Roman Empire would have
installed it in its Greek colonies, and with less difficulty
than in our day, when the Turks possess part of the route
between eastern Macedonia and the Gulf of Lepanto : it is
probable that the Jewish colonists would have been the
first to make use of it, especially when they had to address
correspondents on urgent financial matters, as was the case
with Saint Paul when he wrote the epistles in question.
No one can tell whether the sum of human happiness
has been increased or diminished by the acceleration of
means of communication. Its effects in this respect are
not palpably manifest as are those of other scientific inven-
tions of the Victorian age, such as that of anaesthetics for
surgical operations, which has undoubtedly made the human
race less subject to physical suffering. But whether man-
kind is happier or unhappier under its changed conditions,
the greatest revolution in the history of civilisation has
been accomplished, and it has to be accepted. It ought,
moreover, to be accepted with greater satisfaction by' the
British people than by any other portion of the human
race. For the nation which gave birth to Watt and
Stephenson, Wheatstone and Faraday has been the chief
to profit from the developments of their discoveries.
It is true that our colonies were all founded and our
Indian dependencies conquered before ocean-going steamers
facilitated traffic between them and the mother-country,
before railways were invented to open up their rich resources,
and before the electric telegraph put them in hourly com-
ii2 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
munication with the metropolis. The genius of the British
race which was illustrated by Drake and Frobisher in the
sixteenth century, by Lord Baltimore and William Penn in
the seventeenth, and by Clive and Captain Cook in the
eighteenth, needed no mechanical or scientific aids to
encourage it. To those undaunted Britons, and to others
like them, who for various causes went forth from their
native land in days when a voyage was an adventure
fraught with peril and uncertainty, the primacy of the
English tongue among the languages of the earth is due in
the twentieth century. The dangers and difficulties which
they had to face only stimulated their enterprise and
affirmed their vigour. Had the expansion of England not
begun until the time when a voyage to the antipodes was
within the powers of the feeble, not only should we have
been too late to found an empire beyond the seas, but our
race would have degenerated and would have been unfit
for imperial sway. We owe everything to the spirit and
example of our ancestors, formed amid hardships and
hazards, from the period of the Renaissance, when the
English language and national character took shape, down
to the epoch of invention, which was inaugurated when
Queen Victoria was crowned. The special value of their
tradition lies in its continuity. Spain and France, at various
stages in their modern history, were the leading nations of
the world in colonisation. But their efforts died away ;
while those of England were pursued with an uninterrupted
tenacity which never failed, either amid trouble at home or
reverse abroad. When just two centuries from the day
on which Queen Elizabeth waved a farewell to Frobisher, as
he sailed past Greenwich on his first great voyage, we lost
our American colonies, a less inflexible people would have
THE INAUGURATION OF A NEW ERA 113
been discouraged by their defection, as were the French by
the loss of Canada, seventeen years before the Declaration
of Independence. But the secession of the United States,
instead of inflicting a fatal blow on the territorial ambition
of England, only incited it to fresh acquisition. New con-
quests in India formed an immediate compensation for our
losses in the West. Then came the French Revolution,
caused in part by the example of the American rebellion,
and out of the wars which ensued we took as our spoil a
collection of distant possessions,1 while keeping our hold
on the newly found lands of Australasia to be colonised at
a future day.
IV
Such was the British dominion, acquired by our fore-
fathers before Queen Victoria assumed the Imperial Crown,
with which she was destined to consolidate it. Every yard
of it had been obtained without the aid of any scientific
inventions more recent than those of gunpowder and the
mariner's compass. It was left to the British people as an
inheritance of the ages which were distinguished, in varying
degrees, not less by arduous enterprise than by a practical
sense of beauty in painting, architecture, poetry and letters,
all of which arts have waned in the new commercial era.
It was this inheritance which was destined, under the
crown of Queen Victoria, to turn to our benefit the inven-
tions which, when she assumed it, were rushing forth from
1 The enterprise and bravery of our sailors and soldiers in annexing territories during the
Napoleonic wars were counterbalanced by our listless diplomacy which gave up most of their
acquisitions, notably at the Peace of Amiens, when England, weary of the war, ceded nearly all
its spoils gained in the conflict with France. After the final settlement at the Congress of
Vienna we retained Malta, the Dutch colonies of Ceylon and the Cape, the French colony of
Mauritius and a few West Indian islands — a scant proportion of our conquests.
H
H4 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
England to transform the surface of the world. No one
at this epoch anticipated either the good or the evil
which would result from these scientific discoveries and
from their application to the conditions of existence. The
railway was not then associated with the disfigurement
of smiling landscape as the price to pay for rapidity of trans-
port and consequent industrial development. The year
that the Queen was crowned nothing could be more agree-
able than to take the unaccustomed train at Euston Grove
and to be swiftly borne by it past the classic hill of Harrow,
through the fertile vale of Aylesbury to visit some ancient
hall among the Chilterns or some rural market-town in the
shires, where people were living the tranquil life of their
ancestors amid scenes as yet unchanged, though they were
now brought within a few hours' journey of the capital. It
was by this novel mode of conveyance that joyous crowds
repaired to London for Queen Victoria's coronation from
counties through which the newly opened lines passed.
From the impressions which they recorded, the loyal
travellers do not seem to have realised that they were
taking part in the first stage of a revolution. They
regarded the train as a new experiment in locomotion,
something like the "monster balloon" which, then making
its voyages from Vauxhall Gardens, encouraged the belief
that the secret of aerial navigation had been discovered.
Not for a year or two did the future of steam-traffic inspire
that optimism which produced the disastrous railway-mania
and, at the same time, covered England with a web of
lines.
From that moment the character of the English popula-
tion and its conditions of life were transformed. At the
same time was deteriorated the beauty of English scenery,
THE INAUGURATION OF A NEW ERA 115
which owed its charm less to the grandiose effects of
nature than to our systems of land-tenure and cultivation,
practised in a climate favourable to verdure. The peculiar
amenity of the English landscape before the era of railways
was not a patriotic invention of those who had never
compared it with scenes in other lands. Bishop Berkeley,
whose genius as a philosopher has caused his graphic
descriptions of foreign travel to be neglected, writing to
Pope of the "lightsome days, blue skies, rocks and pre-
cipices" of Italy, declared that "green fields and groves,
flowery meadows and purling streams are nowhere in such
perfection as in England."1 This was in the year that the
House of Hanover succeeded to the British crown ; but a
century and a quarter later, when Queen Victoria had just
come to the throne, the charm of rural England was un-
rivalled in the eyes even of those familiar with the most
picturesque regions of Europe. A few months before her
coronation George Borrow met at Corunna a wandering
Piedmontese, who said, " I would rather be the poorest
tramper on the roads of England than lord of all within ten
leagues of the lake of Como. I have ten letters from as
many countrymen in America who are rich and thriving ;
but every night when their heads are reposing on their
pillows, their souls hurry away to England and its green
lanes and farm-yards. And there they are again at night-
fall in the hedge-alehouses, listening to the roaring song
and merry jests of the labourers, ... oh the green English
hedgerows."2 The latter quotation throws some light on
the cheerful social life of rural England as well as on the
comeliness of its scenery when Queen Victoria was crowned.
1 " The Rev. Dean Berkley to Mr Pope," Leghorn, May, 1714. The Works of Alexander
Pope, Esq. , London, 1751.
2 The Bible in Spain, by George Borrow. Vol. II. ch. viii., London, 1843.
Ii6 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
It can hardly be denied that both had undergone a com-
plete change by the end of her reign.
To the most superficial observer who looks at England from
the window of a railway carriage the transformation of the
surface of the land is obvious. A journey such as that from
King's Cross to the industrial district of Yorkshire reveals the
change. The streets of London stretch nearly to the park
of Hatfield, — one of those enclosures the existence of which
was once blamed by economists and assailed by reformers,
though now they are precious sanctuaries of almost all
that survives of unimpaired rural beauty in England. The
pleasing market towns and villages beyond, amid the
groves of Hertfordshire or of Bedfordshire, are surrounded
with graceless fringes of trivial modern houses proclaiming
them suburbs of the capital. Farther on, when the Fens
are crossed, five or six old provincial centres of agriculture
are each flanked with a dreary wilderness of railway-
sidings : they too have suburbs of their own which straggle
along the line till they approach the confines of the next
town. The dense manufacturing district is reached by the
rapid train before the eye has been allowed to rest for
ten minutes on an unblemished country landscape. Here,
on the brightest day of summer, a gloomy veil obstructs
the sun from lighting up the gaunt and endless streets,
too often built in defiance of sanitary requirement, for the
habitation of the toiling people who produce the wealth
which the smoke represents. It extends far beyond the
limits of the cheerless towns. On the moorlands and in
once rural valleys, the atmosphere is tarnished with the
signs of industrial progress. If the traveller's goal be a
country-house— a Tudor manor where the great maiden
queen once halted, or a spacious hall, planned by Inigo
THE INAUGURATION OF A NEW ERA 117
Jones, or an Italian palace, filled with treasures of art, the
brightness of the interior after nightfall will make him
forget all else besides the immemorial tradition of English
hospitality. But on his morning walk he will note that the
nymphs on the terraces, mourning their Castalian springs,
have veiled themselves in streaky suits of woe, the
yew-tree avenue weeps blots of swarthy dew and the
plucked flower smirches the nostril it was intended to
perfume.
Considerations of this kind might be dismissed as the
fancies of unpractical refinement if it were certain that
the disfigurement of England had been for the greater
happiness of the people. The midland and northern
regions defaced by mineral and industrial development,
the home counties overrun by the suburbs of the swollen
capital, the pastures and orchards of the west menaced
by the builder, the noble and historic coast-line of our
island degraded into a long and insipid esplanade for the
diversion of railway-travelling idlers — all these changes
might be a just price to pay for the progress of civilisation
if they had been coincident with a proportional advance in
the general well-being of the community. In the old days
when locomotion was slow and traffic limited, the hard-
ships of the population were sometimes acute. Oppressive
laws have been repealed, the advance of medical science
has arrested the scourge of epidemic disease, the spread of
education and the reform of the penal system have greatly
reduced crime. But these improvements have not been
due to railways and other products of mechanical in-
vention, which have brought forth other evils, while the
circumstances under which those ills are suffered are less
agreeable. This is not the place for a detailed inquiry into
ii8 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
the economic and social condition of England. It must
suffice to say that the annual number of deaths from starva-
tion, and the large proportion of the inhabitants of Great
Britain who are struggling with hopeless poverty, indicate
some of the untoward results of sixty years' enjoyment of the
new civilisation. In that time the population of the land has
more than doubled, yet its once animated villages are often
deserted, and the rural tracts outside the sphere of influence
of the railways are sometimes solitary wastes. The influx
from the country into the towns is so great that they now con-
tain two-thirds of the entire population, and the consequent
overcrowding and competition for work are such that certain
provincial urban centres vie with London in the misery of
the condition of the poor.1
The fact is that England, through which a postchaise
could be driven from end to end in two days and a night,
was too small a country for railways and the colossal indus-
trial development which came in their wake. England
was like a fair daughter of men, minute of stature, chosen
for his mate by a giant sent down from some monster-
breeding star, and producing with valiant fecundity a race
of mammoths, interspersed with an occasional weakling.
But the efforts of abnormal parturition have disfigured
the little mother, and she has to console herself for her
1 The statistics given by Mr C. Booth, Mr Rowntree and Mr Rider Haggard upon this
subject have been disputed. But the general lines of the sombre pictures of urban and rural
life in England drawn by those able and observant writers cannot be criticised. The state of
things described in the text is not peculiar to England, and is found in countries which have
none of the national compensations about to be mentioned. In Belgium the misery in the
large towns is said to be worse than in ours. In France the depopulation of the rural districts
by the immigration into the towns is further aggravated by the artificial decrease of the birth
rate. The happiest period for the people in France seems to have been that between the end
of the Revolutionary wars, when the population was enjoying in peace the relief from the
fiscal oppression of privilege, and the development of the railway system, which introduced
some of the evils of the new civilisation— less acutely, however, than in England,
THE INAUGURATION OF A NEW ERA 119
battered features by contemplating her prodigious offspring
and their mighty works.
Here we see the compensation which England has
derived from the new civilisation and its attendant evils.
From those ills England, as a fragment of the earth's
surface, has suffered more than any country by reason
of its narrow limits, and also on account of the peculiar
effect of smoke on its insular atmosphere. But England,
as an imperial nation, has profited more than any other in
the world from improved means of communication. The
colonies and dependencies founded and annexed by our
forerunners could not have been effectively developed
under the old conditions, or, being developed, they could
not have been firmly united into one great empire without
the ocean-going steamers which connect them with the
metropolis, and, in a different degree, without the railways
which bind together the component parts of each wide
possession beyond the seas. In the spacious horizons of
Canada and Australia the railways traversing the virgin
soil find their proper scope for the good of mankind.
If a journey of five hours on an English line, from the
Black Country to Plymouth or from London to Man-
chester, gives cause for disquieting reflection, a journey
of five days on the Canadian Pacific Railroad, from the
shores of the Saint Lawrence to beyond the fastnesses of
the Rocky Mountains, imparts to the English traveller a
sense of patriotic exhilaration. Our South African territory,
a mineral-bearing wilderness, fringed with a border of culti-
vation, is marked out as a land incapable of permanent
prosperity without the railway, which will be the chief
agency of conciliation, if the rival white races inhabiting
it are ever to be reconciled. India, with its ancient
120 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
civilisation and its dense native population, stands in a
different category to that of our colonial dependencies.
It is the greatest monument of British enterprise and
administrative skill exercised beyond the seas in the old
era. The application of modern inventions to the govern-
ment and commerce of that vast empire is bearing results
which cannot easily be summarised. It is, however,
interesting to note how in its development we utilise the
improved means of communication which other nations
have adopted, to bind closer the relations of India with the
metropolis. There is no more significant sight in Europe
than that which may be seen on the last day of every week
among the Alpine passes of Savoy, and a few hours later
on the skirts of the Adriatic, when France and Italy clear
their iron- ways for the passage of our Indian mail on its
journey to Brundusium.
The distant parts of the earth would have profited from
the inventions of the new era whatever had happened to
the political system of the land from whence they first
emanated. The progress they have made in the United
States of America shows that to develop them, to the
highest perfection, the protection of the British flag is not
necessary, especially in a land of English speech, peopled
chiefly by men of Anglo-Saxon race. It is not unlikely, it
is even probable that those portions of the British Empire
which are now self-governing colonies, under the British
crown, would for various causes have followed the example
of the United States in quitting the tutelage of the mother-
country but for the binding influence of that crown. It is
equally probable that had the central figure of the epoch-
marking coronation of 1838 not been the young queen, who
reconciled loyalty to the national conscience, who invested
THE INAUGURATION OF A NEW ERA 121
the monarchy with a moral prestige appealing to the pride
and also to the utilitarian instincts of its subjects, if the
sovereign then crowned had been instead of her an
unpopular or unsympathetic personage, the imperial idea
would never have been born. In that case England, bereft
of her offshoots, would, as we have seen, have had no cause
to rejoice at the progress of things. Here we see one of
the advantages which the English nation has derived from
the monarchy in the new era. It was the figure of the
Queen seated on the throne of England which inspired the
imperial citizenship of the colonist and caused it to take the
form of personal allegiance. Without the improved means
of communication between the metropolis and the colonies
that sentiment could not have been effectively developed.
But without the venerated and symbolical figure wearing
the crown the revolutionising products of the age might
have encouraged young and ambitious communities to
break away from the old country instead of strengthening
their links with it. Hence the twofold historical importance
of the Coronation of Queen Victoria. It was the inaugura-
tion of the era in which mankind experienced greater
changes than in any previous period of the world's history.
It was the manifestation to her people of the ruler who
became the instrument to turn those changes to the profit
of the nation, over which she solemnly assumed sovereignty
that day in Westminster Abbey.
CHAPTER II
THE ESTATES OF THE REALM AT THE CROWNING OF
QUEEN VICTORIA
I
THE Coronation of Queen Victoria was the inauguration
of a new era, not only of colonial expansion and of the
consolidation of the British Empire. It also marked
the period in which political power departed from the hands of
a territorial oligarchy, henceforth to be shared in increasing
proportions by the commercial classes. The discoveries of
Watt and of Faraday, which, when applied to means of
locomotion and of communication, converted steam and
electricity into forces destined to revolutionise the world,
were not the sole inventions which, going forth from
England, changed in their development the conditions of
human existence. Already in the eighteenth century
Arkwright with the spinning-jenny, Cartwright with the
power-loom, Crompton with the mule, and other English-
men with similar products of their genius, were preparing
an industrial revolution which, when steam came to be
applied to the novel machinery, affected civilisation more
profoundly than any political or social reform in modern
times, such as the abolition of feudal tenure in England or
of privilege in France. For out of these inventions arose
the great problems, unknown and unforeseen in previous
ages, which have for their basis the relations of capital and
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 123
labour. These problems, which were first foreshadowed
when Queen Victoria assumed the crown of England, are
far from their solution at the beginning of the reign of her
illustrious son. In some communities they have put into
the background all questions of a purely political order,
notably in the great independent offshoot of England, the
United States of America. If our " nation of shopkeepers,"
whose commercial aptitude and enterprise won it that title
before the revolution caused by the application of steam to
machinery, is not in similar case, it is due to the existence
of the monarchy. The crown of England has been a
beneficent influence strong enough to arrest in some degree
the materialisation of social life, which elsewhere is an
essential incident of the capitalist regime. Moreover under
the British crown the opposing forces of labour have been
able to organise themselves in corporations, which, though
formidable, are not in England a hostile menace to orderly
government, as are the trade-unions on the continent of
Europe.
The preponderant sway of capital on the one hand and
the organisation of labour on the other were not subjects
which called for much attention in the year of the Corona-
tion of Queen Victoria. An important change had however
just taken place which had caused a considerable displace-
ment of political power. The enfranchisement of the
middle classes in 1832, and the transfer of a number of
parliamentary seats from pocket boroughs to newly created
industrial constituencies, had modified the political influence
of the landed interest, which was destined further to
diminish under the altered conditions of the commercial era.
But the Estates of the Realm which were summoned to
Westminster Abbey on June 28, 1838, to take their
124 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
traditional part in the Coronation of Queen Victoria were,
for reasons which we shall notice, not yet sensibly affected
by the new legislation. Although no fewer than three
general elections had taken place in the five years succeed-
ing the passage of the Reform Bill, the elements composing
the House of Commons had not greatly changed since the
unreformed era. With a few exceptions the members of
both Houses of Parliament who attended the coronation
may be said to have represented, by birth, by age, and by
association, the old order of things. It was the last full-
dress parade of England of the ancient regime which the
young Queen inspected in the choir and transepts of the
Abbey. If therefore we pass in review some of the
personages who surrounded the throne on that memorable
day we shall more clearly comprehend the place in history
filled by Queen Victoria. For she, who was the chief figure
in this great assembly of people, more than half of whom
were born in the eighteenth century, did not lay aside the
sceptre then placed in her hands, until with it she had
guided into the twentieth century a new imperial nation not
yet born on that Coronation day.
To one of the most intimate of her advisers, in her closing
days, the Queen once said, with some pathos, that she had
been on the throne so long that five generations of friends
and of councillors had passed before her in the course of her
reign. The memory of the venerable sovereign was not at
fault. At the time of her succession among the men to
whom she turned for guidance were the Duke of Wellington,
the Duke of Sussex, her uncle, and Lord Melbourne, her
first Prime Minister. They were all born in the early years
of the reign of George III. : the aged people whom they
knew in their childhood had been subjects of the Stuarts,
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 125
and they themselves were growing up when the French Re-
volution began. The next generation of Queen Victoria's
councillors included five of her Prime Ministers who were
born during the first administration of William Pitt, which
commenced in 1783 : these were, in the order of their birth,
Lord Aberdeen, Lord Palmerston, Sir Robert Peel, Lord
John Russell and Lord Derby. The third series first saw
the light under the Regency, and passed their boyhood
amid echoes of the war with Napoleon : of them the most
notable were Lord Beaconsfield and Mr Gladstone, to
whose names should be added that of the sagacious Dean
of Windsor, Gerald Wellesley. The fourth generation was
composed of men who were somewhat younger than the
Queen and born in the reign of George IV. : such were
the Duke of Argyll, Sir Henry Ponsonby, whom Mr
Gladstone, referring to his confidential relations with his
royal mistress, called the most valuable servant of the
British crown, and Lord Salisbury, whose period of in-
fluence and of office was coincident with the last years of
her life. Finally, there were the men who had never had
any other sovereign than Queen Victoria, who were still
schoolboys when she lost the guidance of the Prince
Consort, and who in her presence felt how brief was their
acquaintance with public affairs compared with that of her
who was experienced in statecraft before they were born.
Of this generation were Lord Rosebery, the only former
Prime Minister of the Queen who survived her, Mr Arthur
Balfour, the leader of the House of Commons at the end
of her reign, and Archbishop Davidson, who as Dean of
Windsor was admitted to her intimate councils, and who as
Bishop of Winchester attended her in her last moments.
Younger even than those three statesmen were some of
126 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
the Queen's ministers in the final administrations of her
reign, having been born in the second half of the nineteenth
century. Moreover, a goodly number of persons were pre-
sent at her coronation who were considerably senior to the
Duke of Wellington, the oldest of the royal councillors
mentioned in the foregoing list. Between the birth of the
most aged of the peers who did homage to Queen Victoria
at her coronation in Westminster Abbey and the birth of
the youngest of her ministers who knelt before her to
receive office in the last period of her reign, there was an
interval of more than a hundred years.
II
The remarkable nature of the link which Queen Victoria
formed between the traditions of the distant past and the
modernism of the twentieth century is vividly brought to
mind by a glance at some of the ancient men who waited
upon her at her coronation. When she succeeded, the
previous year, fifteen members of the House of Lords sur-
vived who had been subjects of George II. Six months
before the Coronation death had removed the most celebrated
of these patriarchs, Lord Eldon, who showed by his career
that in the days of so-called privilege and exclusiveness,
when access to the Upper Chamber was less easy than it is
in our time, the highest dignities were open to the humblest
born if they were endowed with talent, resolution and
industry. Of the other peers who had lived in five reigns,
seven had sufficient vigour to repair to Westminster to pay
their antique homage to the gracious young sovereign —
the Duke of Grafton, the Earls of Westmoreland, Essex,
Limerick and Leicester, Lord Dufferin, the grandfather of
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 127
the empire-making statesman of our time,1 and Lord Rolle.
The last named of these noble relics of the past is the one
whose memory is most inseparably associated with the
Coronation of Queen Victoria. Lord Rolle, like the Trojan
youth who invented the popular practice of going to sleep
during a long sermon, owed his lasting fame to a tumble in
a church. But one at least of this venerable group had a
better balanced title to celebrity, — Mr Coke, of Holkam,
who from the eighteenth century had represented scientific
agriculture in the House of Commons and was called to the
Upper Chamber as Earl of Leicester after the accession of
Queen Victoria. But though his peerage was recent, he
was born as far back as 1752, and it was a striking spectacle,
though its significance could not then be known, to see him
and a little band of contemporaries of the same distant
decade swearing to become the liegemen of life and limb to
the young maiden just crowned, who was destined to reign
until the twentieth century.
Lord Leicester, who thus knelt before Queen Victoria,
was born seven years before his friend William Pitt, who
for thirty-two years had rested here in the Abbey by the
side of his father Chatham. In 1752 the Great Commoner
himself had not yet won that title, having then only held
minor posts in the government. In that year of Lord
Leicester's birth, the son of James II. had still fourteen years
to live : Marie Antoinette was not yet born, and the mother of
Napoleon was an infant of twenty months. Maria Theresa
had worn the ancient crown of Germany, and her rival
1 The lamented Lord Dufferin, to show the means taken by the men of that heroic age to
prolong their years, gave the following reminiscence of his grandfather, ' ' who never had a day's
illness, and lived till eighty-one : he would begin a convivial evening with what he called ' a
clearer,' i.e. a bottle of port, and continued with four bottles of claret. He always retired to
bed in a state of perfect, though benevolent sobriety."
128 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Frederick the Great the brand new crown of Prussia only
twelve years : ten years were to elapse before Catherine
was to mount the throne of Russia over the corpse of her
strangled husband. The British dominions beyond the
seas consisted chiefly of the American colonies which, not
for twenty-one years, were to be stirred to rebellion by the
tea-chests of Boston harbour. The Australian continent,
which was to compensate us for that disaster, was not to be
discovered for another eighteen years, and Captain Cook,
who hoisted the British flag on its shores, was then only a
mate on board a coasting collier. In America the enter-
prise of France gave more cause for alarm than the
grievances of the colonists. The subjects of Louis XV.
established in the valleys of the St Lawrence and the
Mississippi, further claimed that the British settlers should
not cross the Alleghanies and the Ohio. It was in 1759,
the birth year of Lord Westmoreland, another of the
peers who swore allegiance to Queen Victoria, that Wolfe
died victorious on the heights above Quebec, when the sub-
mission of Canada gave the death-blow to French ambitions
in the western hemisphere. Lord Westmoreland in his
early manhood took part in a great drama connected with
the British Empire at the opposite side of the globe. Fifty
years before the Coronation of Queen Victoria he had
marched in solemn state with his peers to the hall of William
Rufus, to try Warren Hastings, impeached by the Commons
of high crimes and misdemeanours. It was just in the
period when he and his aged colleagues first saw the light
that the issue was decided whether France or England
should possess the Indian Empire, which Warren Hastings
with ruthless hand was to organise. His forerunner Clive
was then checking the schemes of Labourdonnais and
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 129
Dupleix, and having foiled French influence he established
the domination of England in the East by the victory of
Plassey in 1757, the year that Lord Essex and Lord Rolle
were born.
Such were the associations connected with the venerable
age of some of the loyal subjects of the Queen who made
obeisance before her when she had been invested with the
ensigns of royalty. In their lifetime already many stupen-
dous changes had taken place in the map of the world and
in the government of the territories delineated upon it.
But neither the partition of Poland, nor the rise of Prussia,
nor the fall of the Holy Roman Empire, nor even the consti-
tution of the United States, nor even the French Revolution
could be compared in importance with the consolidation
of the British Empire which was to take place in the reign
of the sovereign just crowned, upon foundations laid since
they were born. Yet none of those present in Westminster
Abbey, conscious though they were that they were living on
the verge of an age of marvels, foresaw what the throne,
around which they pressed, would symbolise when its next
inheritor was placed upon it. According to the ancient
form and order of coronation, just before the homage of the
peers, the sovereign is lifted up into the throne, which the
Primate in his exhortation then declares to be "the seat
of imperial dignity." Those words on Archbishop Howley's
lips when spoken to Queen Victoria seemed only a stately
liturgical phrase of no special significance. But when Arch-
bishop Temple's trembling voice addressed them to King
Edward they had a meaning which found an echo in every
British heart. For in the reign of Queen Victoria, the
British Empire, which had come into existence during the
lifetime of the aged men who saluted the crown placed on
130 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
her head, had, under that crown, attained proportions un-
precedented in the history of powers and dominations : and
the "imperial dignity of the throne" was no longer a mere
sonorous phrase.1
HI
It has been worth while to signalise the presence in the
Abbey of these ancient witnesses of the distant past before
turning to more important figures in the pageant, who by
their origin, their official rank or their own achievements
were representatives of the old order of things about to
disappear, or of the new era which was dawning, or who
displayed in their persons the continuity of British traditions
which is still our proudest boast.
Conspicuous among the princely personages surrounding
the young Queen was her favourite uncle, the Duke of
Sussex, towering head and shoulders above the tallest of the
throng. Although he had attained manhood in the days
when the French Revolution and its attendant wars had
driven cultivation from courts, he was a liberal-minded patron
of learning. In this capacity he had the distinction of hav-
ing formed a finer collection of books than any English
prince, not of kingly rank, since the days of Humfrey,
Duke of Gloucester, who four hundred years before the
Coronation of Queen Victoria endowed the University of
Oxford with the nucleus of the Bodleian Library. He and
his younger brother the Duke of Cambridge, who was like-
wise present, had sealed their letters, till they were men,
with the royal arms quartered with the lilies of France,
which Edward III. had assumed in 1340 and George III.
1 See book iv. chapter 6. Humfrey.
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 131
had discarded only when the nineteenth century began.
For more than thirty years of their lives those princes were
contemporaries of the last heir male of the House of Stuart,
Cardinal York, the grandson of James II., who died at Rome
in 1807. The younger of the Queen's uncles was accom-
panied by two of his children who as Duke of Cambridge
and Grand Duchess of Mecklenburg-Strelitz were present
at the coronation of King Edward, sixty-four years later.
His youngest daughter, the Princess Mary Adelaide, than
whom in her stately maturity no princess was better beloved
by the English people, was not yet five years old, so she
was not taken to the Abbey as were her little grandchildren
when their illustrious paternal grandparents were crowned.
Foremost among the royal Princesses was the mother
of the young queen, to whose parents the English nation
ought to be eternally grateful for having called her
Victoria : for by her, that name, of glorious sound, even
before it became a glorious tradition in the annals of
England, was given to the future Queen. The Duchess
of Kent was a princess of the intelligent family of Saxe-
Coburg and Gotha, whose descendants now fill the thrones
of nearly half the countries of Europe. One of her nephews
had, twenty months before, married another young Queen,
Maria da Gloria of Portugal, and upon another was soon
to be bestowed the great prize of Europe and of the entire
world. King Leopold, the younger brother of the
Duchess of Kent, and the uncle of Prince Albert, had
already conceived the idea of marrying his illustrious
young niece to his nephew. England, which had always
treated Leopold as a son since his brief union with the
Princess Charlotte of Wales, had made him King of the
Belgians, and in return he was to send to England an
132 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
excellent consort for the young Queen, whose admirable
disposition only needed such a guide to maintain her in
the paths of wisdom for the welfare of the realm, in the
unforeseen transition which was about to change its
character.
Some of the foreign envoys present at the Coronation
of Queen Victoria had played important parts in the his-
tory of Europe during the crowded period which lasted from
the French Revolution till the final settlement of accounts
after the great organiser of the Revolution had been
taken to die at St Helena. The ambassador most warmly
cheered by the crowds of London was one of Napoleon's
lieutenants, Marshal Soult, whom Louis Philippe sent on a
special mission to the coronation. Fifty-three years before,
he had entered the royal army of Louis XVI. When the
Republic, which followed the deposition of the King, turned
into an Empire, the new Emperor, on crowning himself at
Notre Dame, gave him the baton of a marshal. With it
he led the fray against Austrian, Prussian, and Russian,
till on the field of Friedland he won the title of Duke of
Dalmatia. Then, when his master was elsewhere em-
ployed, to him was left the vain task of opposing British
arms in the Peninsula. Many a name embroidered on
the colours of our regiments tells of a struggle with
Soult, in Portugal or Spain, and again in France at the
end of that campaign, when Wellington met him on the
Bidassoa, and drove him back across the Nivelle and the
Nive right up to Toulouse. There the last battle took
place, needless as it was bloody, — for Napoleon had already
abdicated, and England was the ally of the most Christian
King of France and Navarre. The white cockade which
Soult put on a few days later did not prevent him joining
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 133
his old chief at Waterloo. Luckier than his comrade Ney,
he was not shot by the royal government of France for his
final encounter with the English. Pardoned by Louis
XVIII., who recognised his revolutionary dukedom and
gave him back his baton, he qualified himself for taking
part in royal coronations by bearing the sceptre when
Charles X. was crowned at Reims. That homage to
legitimacy did not prevent his becoming the Prime
Minister of Louis Philippe, who usurped his cousin's
throne. It was as his envoy that this old soldier of fortune
took his place in Westminster Abbey among the high-
born representatives of the ancient monarchies, and on his
way thither the populace greeted him with acclamations
louder even than those which they gave to his former
adversary Wellington.
The figure of Soult at the Coronation of Queen Victoria
is worth considering because the old marshal incarnated in
his person the changes which had taken place in Europe
since the taking of the Bastille, and was thus a link
between the ancient regime which ended in 1789 and the
new era inaugurated in 1838, after half a century of warlike
and revolutionary interlude. It is not necessary to dwell
so long on the personality of the other foreign envoys,
interesting as some of them were. Among them there was
another representative of France, the successor of Talley-
rand as resident ambassador at the Court of St James.
General Sebastiani was a devoted Corsican adherent of
Napoleon, who had been the right hand of his great com-
patriot when he attained the supreme power by the coup
d'ttat of 1 799, while the tragic death of his daughter was
to be one of the events which helped to bring about the
coup d'ttat of 1851 and the restoration of the Corsican
134 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
dynasty.1 Another Corsican present in the Abbey was
the Russian ambassador, Pozzo di Borgo. All natives of
the land of the vendetta either love or hate one another,
and the hate of Pozzo for Bonaparte was such that, having
been born in 1764, before the island was united to France,
he had no scruple in repudiating his allegiance to that
country when his compatriot became its master. Entering
the service of Russia, he had at last a complete revenge
over the comrade of his youth when in 1814 he came to
France with the allies to aid in the deposition of Napoleon,
and was then left by the Tsar Alexander in Paris as
ambassador to the restored Bourbons. The Portuguese
envoy, Duke of Palmella, was likewise associated with the
great drama which occupied the stage of Europe during
the first period of the nineteenth century, and of which
some of the scenes were laid in his country, at Cintra,
Torres- Vedras and Busaco. Here in Westminster Abbey
he met some of his friends of the Congress of Vienna, in
which he had taken a prominent part. The Austrian
ambassador, Prince Paul Esterhazy, had other titles to
celebrity besides his turquoises and diamonds, which
dazzled the London mob. It was he who was sent by
Francis II. with a favourable answer, to meet Berthier
when the hero of Wagram came to demand the hand of
Marie Louise for the recent husband of Josephine Beau-
harnais. What memories these colleagues of Talleyrand,
of Metternich and of Nesselrode had. How pale compared
with them will be the reminiscences of diplomatists of our
time, when the most romantic adventure permitted to an
1 General Sebastian! was the father of the unfortunate Duchesse de Choiseul-Praslin, whose
assassination by her husband in 1847 created such a feeling in France against the upper
classes that it was one of the contributory causes of the downfall of the Orleans monarchy and
the consequent revival of the Empire.
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 135
ambassador is to sign his name to a commercial treaty, and
when diplomatic history is -manufactured on a telegraph
wire which runs from Downing Street, or the Quai d'Orsay,
or the Wilhelm Strasse.
IV
There was an old warrior standing by the throne of his
young queen who enjoyed high estimation among the
diplomatists of those great days, who had known him at
Vienna, Paris and Verona. The Duke of Wellington in
1838 was possibly more respected on the continent than
he was popular in England. In spite of his supreme
position in the country, his identification with the policy
of a party had exposed him to the disfavour of the populace.
But the influence which he had exercised in the councils of
Europe had given him unique international prestige. The
soldier who had worsted Napoleon was looked upon as the
final saviour of society from the domination of the French
Revolution. Though the prosperity of the revolutionary
Monarchy of July had revived the credit of the legend of
1789, the Duke was regarded with gratitude and veneration
in the absolute courts of the continent. Indeed, this was
one of the reasons of his passing unpopularity in England,
where at the elections, during the French insurrection of
1830, the Whigs adroitly connected the names of Polignac
and Wellington as an argument in favour of parliamentary
reform. Among the comrades in arms of the Duke, in the
Peers' gallery, were Hill, his "right hand," Anglesey, who
had left a leg at Waterloo, and Combermere, the hero of
the Peninsula ; while among the Commons were Hussey
Vivian, the dashing commander of the light cavalry at
136 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Waterloo, who was soon to be ennobled like Rowland Hill
and Stapleton Cotton, and the gallant De Lacy Evans, who
was member for Westminster, being, unlike his old chief, a
Radical politician.
By the side of the Duke of Wellington, in the Queen's
procession, walked the Prime Minister, bearing the sword
of State. Among all the subjects of the new sovereign
no two natures and characters could be found more dis-
similar than those of her two chief advisers, official and
unofficial, Melbourne and Wellington. Lord Melbourne
was sympathetic, unambitious, sceptical and warm-hearted,
with aptitudes ranging from theology to gallantry. His
winning manner had secured the confidence of the young
queen, from the morning of her accession, when he gave
her, with genial charm, her first lesson in statecraft, in her
old home at Kensington Palace, before the first meeting of
her Privy Council.
Two other members of the Queen's first cabinet walked
in her procession. The President of the Council, Lord
Lansdowne, was the son of Lord Shelburne, the Prime
Minister of 1782. He himself, when Lord Henry Petty,
had, as Chancellor of the Exchequer, sat side by side with
Charles Fox and Windham in Lord Grenville's " Ministry of
all the Talents." The Lord Privy Seal, Lord Duncannon,
was also Chief Commissioner of Works, and had found a
place in the Abbey for his little sons, one of whom, after a
long official career, in which he was known as Sir Spencer
Ponsonby-Fane, headed the procession of princes and
princesses of the blood-royal at the Coronation of Edward
VII. There were other famous cabinet ministers who saw
Queen Victoria crowned. Lord Palmerston, her masterful
Secretary for Foreign Affairs, had begun his official career
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 137
so long ago, in the Tory Ministry of Spencer Percival, that
even in 1835 Disraeli spitefully called him "an old hack,"
though he had thirty more years of public life before him.
There was Lord John Russell, the Home Secretary, the
petulant pilot of the Reform Bill in the House of Commons ;
Lord Holland, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, power-
ful by the social influence which emanated from his historic
house, then on the borders of rural Middlesex.1 There was
also Lord Glenelg, better known as Charles Grant, the
Minister for the Colonies, who had recently sent to explore
Western Australia a young soldier, afterwards famous
during fifty years of the Queen's reign as Sir George
Grey, governor of three great colonies, in one of which he
remained to become its prime minister, — one of the chief
authors of the revival of the imperial idea. The colonial
office, even at that period, was not a restful sinecure. The
controversy arising out of the results of negro emancipa-
tion and the rebellion in Canada, which Lord Durham had
undertaken to pacify, were subjects requiring some depart-
mental attention, when Lord Glenelg was Secretary of State.
Nevertheless, the colonies were not treated as an integral
and essential part of the British Empire till after his time,
though he lived to be nearly ninety. Sixteen months
before his death in 1866, the Times, sermonising the
colonies for their attitude to " the most patient of metro-
politan governments," said, " The colonists will gradually
learn that if the Imperial Government is tolerant of their
occasional eccentricities, it is also, both politically and
economically, independent of their allegiance."2 Although
1 Lamartine describing, in conversation, the rural situation of this famous resort of famous
men, of which the political influence was a feature of the period, said, " Apres Holland House
la foret."
2 Times, December 31, 1864.
138 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
the word Imperial was spelt with a capital in this strange
admonition, the epithet, no more in 1864 than in 1838, had
acquired the significance which the latter half of the reign
of Queen Victoria gave to it.
Among statesmen not in office the most conspicuous was
Sir Robert Peel. His influence in the House of Commons
was not less than that of Wellington in the House of
Lords. Indeed the personal ascendancy of these two Tory
leaders was a powerful cause of the weakness of the Whigs
in the early years after the Reform Bill, when they had
discontented the left wing of their own party by treating
that legislation as a measure of " finality." By the probity
of his mind and the integrity of his life Sir Robert Peel
was, in the eyes of his countrymen, the perfect type of the
upright Englishman of those days. Dignified, prudent,
and wealthy, he was also a ripe scholar, an adept at figures,
a sonorous speaker. The fact that he was a member of
an industrial family, which was unconnected by birth or
marriage with either of the great Whig or Tory political
dynasties, appealed to the sympathy and confidence of the
newly enfranchised middle-class, and he may be considered
to have been the founder of modern conservatism, though
he was destined to wreck the Conservative party.
Two other ex-ministers present at the Coronation merit a
word of mention. Though they were out of office, Lord
Grey and Lord Brougham both belonged to the party in
power. The burden of years had determined Lord Grey's
retirement, after his memorable premiership of the Reform
Ministry, but Lord Howick, who lived to the last decade
of the nineteenth century, represented his father's great
tradition in Lord Melbourne's cabinet, where he was
Secretary-at-War. Lord Grey was the last survivor of the
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 139
brilliant band of orators who enriched the Whig party in
the House of Commons on the eve of the French Revolu-
tion. Such was his precocious eloquence that at the age of
twenty-four he was selected by the House to conduct the
impeachment of Warren Hastings, with Burke, Fox,
Sheridan and Windham, of whom the first three were
orators unsurpassed since the days when Demosthenes
resisted the aggressions of Philip of Macedon, or when
Cicero obtained for Pompey the command in the Mith-
ridatic War.
Between the reserved and unaffected dignity of Grey,
who was the embodiment of the party system to which we
owe our splendid parliamentary tradition, and the vivacious,
eccentric and omniscient vanity of Brougham, who was
impatient of party ties, there could be no wider contrast.
Yet they had points of resemblance. Both were Liberals,
of the best age of Liberalism. Both in debate were un-
rivalled masters of the English language. In one important
controversy, somewhat outside the domain of politics,
these men of different temperament and antecedents had
acted together and had won fresh renown and popular
approval. At the trial of Queen Caroline, seconded by
Denman (who, as Lord Chief Justice, was also present
at Queen Victoria's Coronation), her attorney-general,
Brougham, had risen to the height of forensic eloquence,
while Grey, who was one of her judges, propounded ques-
tions of law and cross-examined witnesses with the skill of
a trained jurist. When Queen Victoria was crowned,
Brougham, who had been Chancellor in the Reform
Ministry, and had borne the Great Seal at the coronation of
William IV., was excluded from office, and he was devoting
his talents to social reform and scientific experiment. In
140 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
1803, the year after he had assisted at the birth of the Edin-
burgh Review, he had published an Inquiry into the Colonial
Policy of the European Powers. It does not appear that
that subject interested him at the beginning of the reign at
the close of which colonial questions were to change the
basis of our political ideas. In 1838 Lord Brougham
believed that the salvation of the British race had been
found in the establishment of Mechanics' Institutes in the
provincial towns, and of University College in Gower
Street.
It is important to notice the varied ability and high
renown of the ministers and statesmen of ministerial rank
who surrounded the young Queen at her Coronation.
Those among them who were admitted to her intimate
counsels, as privileged advisers, reflected the lofty tone
which prevailed in parliamentary circles in those days.
Had the Queen come to the throne at a moment of political
decadence, when statesmen were corrupt or commonplace,
it cannot be doubted that even her high character, then in
the course of formation, would have suffered from the
contact of such influences. The first three years of her
reign, before her happy marriage, were of critical import-
ance to her and to her people. Her intelligence was ripe
beyond its years, and from the hour of her accession she
applied it to learning the lessons which her counsellors
had to impart. The consequence was that when she chose
for her consort, a prince distinguished for his intellectual
gifts, she had not to accept the guidance of a superior.
The royal bride of 1840 had submitted her receptive
faculties to a long course of vigorous training, both in
statecraft and in business-like efficiency, at the hands of
eminent preceptors who knew the theory and the practice.
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 141
The Queen never forgot the teachings of her maidenhood,
and in her latter days, when her womanliness called forth
the filial devotion of her subjects, she was at the same
time the most experienced statesman in Europe and the
best man of business in the British Empire.
Hence the statesmen who attended the Queen in West-
minster Abbey were for a special reason worthy to take a
prominent part in a scene which was the inauguration of a
new era. To that scene they lent the prestige of the best
traditions of English political life, which they had directly
received from the great age when party government had
succeeded to the struggle of the court and country factions.
For reasons which have been noted in the early pages of
this work, the succession of Queen Victoria was a pro-
vidential event which, in a critical period of transition and
innovation, prevented the revival of a party hostile to the
monarchy. That this was perilously near at a certain
moment was shown by the tone adopted by a great parlia-
mentary leader like Lord Grey, when in the House of
Lords he denounced the Liverpool ministry for the part it
had taken in the trial of Queen Caroline. That peril was
entirely conjured by the accession of Queen Victoria.
Henceforth it was her presence on the throne which
enabled men of the most diverse views on administrative
and fiscal questions, many of which were the creation of
the new era, to advocate their creeds and to found upon
them legislative measures, without ever calling in question
the ancient constitution of the land.
It was also her presence on the throne, as the sacred
figure-head of the constitution, which retained the allegiance
of her subjects settled in distant lands, when the expansion
of England had attained, under the new conditions of
142 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
transport and communication, proportions undreamed of
when she was crowned. It was thus the sovereign, and
not the statesmen whom she saw around her at her Corona-
tion, nor even their successors of the next generation, to
whom was chiefly due the growth of the imperial idea and
the consequent consolidation of the British Empire. But
the politicians of 1838 cannot be blamed for not having
anticipated what was scarcely foreseen a quarter of a
century later, when the steamship, the railway and the electric
telegraph had been in use during the intervening period.
The work attempted by Lord Durham in Canada at the
time of the Queen's Coronation shows that the high sense
of patriotic duty and the trained political intellect of the
statesmen of those days were capable of producing Empire-
makers. But the imperial idea had not yet taken shape.
Only after the great race of parliamentarians had passed
away did it emanate from the throne, to be applied to the
consolidation of the British dominions by men who were
little children or were unborn when she, who was to in-
carnate that idea, received the imperial crown.
We shall not find much trace of imperial sentiment, as it
was understood at the end of the Queen's reign, among Her
Majesty's Commons who came to see her crowned. But
before turning to them, the first Estate of the Realm, as
represented in Westminster Abbey, calls for some notice.
In the gallery of archiepiscopal portraits at Lambeth
Palace, Archbishop Howley is the last of the tenants of
the see who is represented with a wig. He and the other
Lords Spiritual wore at the Coronation that head-dress as
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 143
a relic of a period when the most reactionary prelate in the
Church of England never thought of assuming, excepting
as an armorial bearing, the mitre, which is not a con-
venient adjunct to a perruque.1 The spiritual face of
Archbishop Howley, as seen on the canvas in the Guard
Room at Lambeth, calls to mind the punning designation
of the men of his time, who named him " the beauty of
holiness." He was, as Mr Gladstone said of him, " a revered
man," and had been on the bench for twenty-five years when
he crowned Queen Victoria, having been, like Warham, Laud
and Juxon, translated from London, as his successors, Tait
and Temple, were to be. But his brother of York had
been a bishop for nearly half a century ; so on account of
his great age and his association with the ways of the past,
Archbishop Vernon Harcourt was one of the most
characteristic figures at Queen Victoria's coronation. A
younger son of Lord Vernon, he had married the sister of
Lord Gower, who became first Duke of Sutherland. His
entry into an important cousinhood of families, which,
less ancient than his own, rose to power in the eighteenth
century, had a speedy result, when in 1791 Mr Pitt made
him Bishop of Carlisle at the age of thirty-two. That see
being poorly endowed he retained a canonry of Christ
Church and a family living, along with the bishopric, until
the Duke of Portland promoted him to York, where for
forty years he exercised his gilded apostolate with stateli-
1 This was the experience of the great Gallican Bishops of the grand sitcle. The effect of
a mitre perched upon a wig may be partially conjectured from the coronet of the Lord
Chancellor, in similar posture, as worn at the Coronation. Those peers who possessed
coronets, made for their ancestors in the eighteenth century, found them too large for their
heads in 1902, not because their intellectual organs were smaller than their great-grand-
fathers', but because the latter wore their coronets over wigs. Canon Duckworth informs
me that he saw Archbishop Sumner wearing his wig at a Levee as late as 1857.
144 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
ness and piety till he died in 1847. In 1830, having
inherited the estates of Lord Harcourt, he assumed that
name, and in the Coronation year of Queen Victoria he was
offered a renewal of the Harcourt peerage, which he
refused. The fact of a hereditary seat in the House of
Lords being offered to a spiritual peer shows how widely
the conception of the episcopal function at the beginning of
the Victorian era differed from that which was current at
the end of the Queen's reign. But the office of a bishop in
those days involved many temporal duties which are not
now associated with the purple. Thus Archbishop Vernon
Harcourt's coach and six was expected to take its place on
the Knavesmire with the carriages of the other county
magnates at York races when August came round, though
the primate did not grace the meeting with his visible
presence.1
The Archbishop of York had preached the sermon at the
coronation of George IV. and of William IV. That duty
he ceded to the Bishop of London when Queen Victoria
1 The Archbishop was fond of a horse, having learned to ride in the middle of the
eighteenth century, when stage-coaches were rare and when he had to go from his Derbyshire
home to school at Westminster on horseback, and Yorkshiremen liked to believe that their
Primate used invisibly to view the races through a gap in a hedge, which became legendary.
In the privately printed Harcourt Papers the following letter from Lord Sidmouth, Home
Secretary, to Archbishop Vernon throws a light on the system of colonisation practised on
the eve of Queen Victoria's birth. "Whitehall, August 16, 1817.
" My dear Lord, — I have this day received your Grace's letter of the i3th inst., and I heartily
wish it was in my power to accomplish the object of it, by permitting the poor women you
mention to proceed to New South Wales. But the Government of that settlement having
been put to much inconvenience and expense in consequence of allowing females to proceed to
that Colony before it has been ascertained that their husbands were in circumstances to enable
them to take proper care of their wives and families, it has been settled that no female shall be
allowed the indulgence of a passage to New South Wales until either the Governor of that
Colony has communicated to the Government of England that any prisoner who is desirous
of his wife and children joining him, has conducted himself properly in the Colony and has
the means of taking care of them ; or that the Secretary of State is in possession of such
account as would bear no doubt in his mind that, by his granting such indulgence, it would
not encumber the Colony with the maintenance of these persons."
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 145
was crowned. It would perhaps be unfair to class Dr
Blomfield with Dr Butler, whom Lord Melbourne had
recently sent from Shrewsbury School to Lichfield, as " a
Greek-play Bishop," for his pastoral activity was untiring :
but his contemporaries were more unanimous on the merits
of his editions of /Eschylus than of his episcopal career.
The brothers Sumner, both prelates of great sanctity of
life, in spite of the dubious origin of their preferment, were
also in the choir, the elder bearing the Bible as Bishop of
Winchester : the younger, who had succeeded Blomfield at
Chester, a diocese relatively more important then than now,
was to die Primate of All England. His future successor at
Canterbury, Longley, represented at the Coronation Ripon,
the first of the new sees created since Tudor times, of which
seven more were to be founded in Queen Victoria's reign.
Among other bishops present were Copleston of Llandaff,
who was also Dean of St Paul's, and had given up the
provostship of Oriel to Hawkins, just before that post be-
came for a season the most interesting headship in the
University of Oxford ; Edward Stanley of Norwich, who
was beloved by his friends but whose chief fame was to be
the father of Arthur Stanley, Dean of Westminster ; and
Henry Phillpotts of Exeter. " Harry of Exeter," the son
of an innkeeper, showed by his career that, in days less
democratic than ours, high promotion in the Church was
not an exclusive birthright reserved for patricians like
Vernon Harcourt, of which class indeed there were not
more than three among the bishops when Queen Victoria
was crowned. But Phillpotts did not inherit a spirit of
humility with his humble birth. He not only ruled the
great diocese of the west with masterful autocracy, but
wished his authority to continue after his translation to
146 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
another world. From thence he was once brought back,
when stricken with sickness which seemed to be mortal, by
the whispered hint that Lord Palmerston was in office and
would nominate to the vacant see. But he only revived to
reserve the patronage to a minister whose ecclesiastical
conscience was more dreaded by the Church than the
scepticism of Palmerston ; and Mr Gladstone sent to
Exeter a heterodox Devonian, who was a poor boy work-
ing at Tiverton for his Blundell scholarship, when Bishop
Phillpotts drove up the western road to the Queen's Corona-
tion. What would the old Tory highchurchman have said
had he been told, in his latter days, that the next sovereign
would be crowned by Temple of Balliol and Rugby, whose
orthodox renown was to be won when ruling the diocese of
Exeter ?
Cardinal Manning1 once, when giving a friend some
letters of introduction to the Bishops of France, said with
that genial malice which added a zest to his conversation,
" I am afraid that you will find my brethren of the French
hierarchy chiefly remarkable for their goodness." A similar
observation might apply to the spiritual lords who assisted
at the Coronation of Queen Victoria.2 At a time when the
temporal peerage contained a number of great names, and
when the House of Commons abounded in talent, never
perhaps to be surpassed in its new lodging which Mr
1 In 1845, Archbishop Vernon Harcourt, almoner to the Queen, being too old to discharge
the duties of his office, Manning was offered the sub-almonership vacant by the promotion of
his late wife's brother-in-law, Samuel Wilberforce, to the bishopric of Oxford. The post
would have brought the Archdeacon of Chichester into intimate connection with the Court and
would, as he believed, have inevitably led to his speedy elevation to the Bench ; so his refusal
of it, for unworldly motives, possibly had a great influence on the ecclesiastical history of
England in the reign of Queen Victoria.
2 The most eminent prelate of the then United Church of England and Ireland was
Whately, who had been appointed Archbishop of Dublin in 1831, but he was not present at
the Coronation.
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 147
Barry was then designing, the right reverend bench was
ill provided with men of high distinction. The withdrawal
of the bishops from the House of Lords was advocated
as an article of moderate reform. Politicians who were
opposed to the disestablishment of the Church, did not
hesitate to propose the abolition of an Estate of the realm.
As Englishmen set very little store, on theoretical grounds, by
their constitution, the intact antiquity of which is the envy
of foreign nations, one reason why the first Estate is now
rarely threatened, except by the partizans of disestablishment,
is probably because, during the reign of Queen Victoria,
the type and character of its members became worthier of
a historical institution. Indeed, of the three estates of the
realm it is the one of which the composition most sensibly
improved during the latter half of the nineteenth century.
This was in part due to the Oxford movement, which
may be said to have attained its greatest force in the year
of the Coronation, Newman having become editor of the
Tracts for the Times in 1838, and his position in the
Anglican Church being then at its height. It cannot be
wholly ascribed to that movement, as few of the prelates
who revived the prestige of their order had anything to do
with it, while some of the most eminent, notably Tait, were
its opponents. It is a belief too commonly accepted that
the Church of England was in a state of pagan indifference
until certain fellows of Oriel and Balliol descended from
their common-rooms to awake a slumbering world. No
one who is acquainted with the intimate journals and corre-
spondence of quiet English families in the reign of George
III. can doubt that in those days, reputed dark by our
modern apostles, there were found in manor-house, in
parsonage and in country town more personal piety, more
148 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
beautiful lives of blameless example than the age of adver-
tisement has seen. To what extent Christianity is com-
patible with the developments of civilisation is a question
which perhaps our grandchildren will be competent to judge.
The initiators of the Oxford movement seemed to dread the
issue, and their original aim was to counteract the influence
of modern progress. But unconsciously they and their
disciples were the creatures of the forces to which they
thought they were antagonistic. They were not reaction-
aries but revolutionists ; and the Oxford movement, looked
back upon, is manifestly one of the phenomena of that new
era to which we have proposed to attach the conventional
date of 1838. The type of ecclesiastic which it has produced
is better suited to the conditions of life which have resulted
from the railway system, such as the growth of crowded
urban centres, than to the tranquil isolation of the Christian
ministry as exercised in England under the old era.
As a consequence of these changes signs were not want-
ing at the end of the reign of Queen Victoria of a tendency
or a desire to reorganise the episcopate on a utilitarian
basis. It is to be hoped that that movement may be
moderated, however praiseworthy the motives of its origin.
An episcopate formed of diligent administrators and zealous
missionaries does not possess all the qualities essential to a
body which is an integral part of an ancient constitution.
A self-denying prelate who, without learning or polished
eloquence, divests himself of outward dignity and devotes
himself to good works may be a more admirable figure
than a bishop of the old school, who drove in a coach and six
or annotated the Seven against Thebes ; but he is equally
lacking in those representative qualities which the delegates
of an Estate of the realm ought to display. The happy
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 149
mean between the too comfortable piety of the past and the
restless asceticism, which looms in the future, was found in
the lives of a number of Queen Victoria's bishops, who
adapted the old traditions of the national Church to the
new conditions of existence.
A bishop of the Church of England ought to possess
qualities which presumably would have won for him a high
place had he followed a secular calling, and which appeal
to those who are not ecclesiastically minded. In the
words attributed to the first great apologist of unascetic
Christianity, in his catalogue of episcopal virtues, " he must
have a good report of them which are without." Such was
the character of Tait, who was a schoolmaster and a states-
man of the first rank. Such were the historians Connop
Thirlwall, the most erudite divine of the nineteenth century,
whose pastoral charges were as wise as his writings were
learned, and Stubbs, the revealer of mediaeval England
to modern Oxford, who brought more prestige to the
episcopate than they took from it. Such were Samuel
Wilberforce and Magee, whose witty eloquence was unsur-
passed in either House of Parliament. All those prelates,
with their diverse intellectual and social gifts, performed
with efficiency their pastoral functions in dissimilar Eng-
lish sees, as also did Jacobson, the judicious theologian ;
Selwyn, the colonial pioneer ; Harvey Goodwin, the mathe-
matician ; Eraser, the educational expert ; Thomson, the
metaphysician. Then there was the remarkable group
from Birmingham, which did credit to that enterprising city
not less than its varying political products — Prince Lee,
the master of the Grammar School, and his trio of
pupils, Westcott, Benson and Lightfoot. All of these
began and ended their episcopal careers in the reign
1 50 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
of Queen Victoria. One of the most meritorious, Mandell
Creighton, not till five years after the Queen was crowned
began his life, which, with its work uncompleted, was
sacrificed at its prime to the novel and wasteful conception
of the duties of an English bishop. It may be that prelates
of the type of the Queen's first primate of the northern
province would be out of place in our time. But the
Church of England, in the generation preceding his, pro-
duced bishops who would have been the glory of any age.
When Vernon Harcourt's father was a child Burnet was
finishing his precious work, historical and theological, at
Salisbury. The old men of his own childhood had, when
they were children, seen Sancroft at Lambeth and the
saintly Ken at Wells, before their ejection from their sees
as non-jurors : they had been alive with Tillotson, Stilling-
fleet and Bull, while only on the eve of his own birth
Berkeley and Butler died. The author of the Analogy,
like Creighton, was the bishop of a populous city before
his translation to Durham, then a rural town. But the
diocese of Bristol made less fatal claim on his forces than
did London on the historian of the Papacy, and there he
continued the revision of the priceless work, which might
never have confirmed the Christian doctrine if missionary
zeal had absorbed the Church of England when he was in
training for the episcopate.
VI
The members of the House of Commons at the Corona-
tion of Queen Victoria were seated in a gallery erected over
the high altar, in a space which, with greater propriety, at
the Coronation of King Edward was not occupied by spec-
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 151
tators. The Lower House, though three times renewed
under the new franchise, enacted only six years before,
retained many of its old elements and most of its ancient
characteristics. It will not be necessary to dwell at length
on the most aged members of the House of Commons, as
none of them were as old as the oldest of the peers, whose
antiquity has already been noted. The father of the
House of Commons was George Byng, first returned to
the "Parliament of Great Britain" for Middlesex in 1780
with John Wilkes. He was a great-nephew of the admiral
whose iniquitous execution inspired Voltaire with an
immortal epigram ; but he was not born till seven years
after his unfortunate relative's death, which had taken place
in the lifetime of several of the patriarchs of the House of
Lords. The Speaker was the son of another warrior, Sir
Ralph Abercromby, who died more gloriously, mortally
wounded at the battle of Alexandria in the hour of victory.
Speaker Abercromby had but a brief term in the chair. It
came to an end a few months later, when his elevation
to the peerage caused the vacancy at Edinburgh which
brought back Macaulay to parliament ; and Abercromby was
succeeded, as speaker, by the member for Hampshire, Shaw-
Lefevre, who had proposed his election, and who till forty
years after the Queen's Coronation never missed the annual
introduction of the budget, though he retired to the House
of Lords in 1857. Evelyn Denison, who took his place,
and was the last Speaker who spoke as a private member
in debate, when the House was in Committee, had not been
returned at the election of 1837, though he had sat in
parliament long before that date, and had been a Lord of
the Admiralty in Mr Canning's administration.
Among the younger men the two most interesting
152 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
figures, in view of their subsequent careers, were Mr Glad-
stone, the member for Newark, and Mr Disraeli, the
member for Maidstone. Nothing could be in greater
contrast than the political start in life of the two future
rivals. Gladstone, the paragon of Eton ; the pattern gentle-
man-commoner of Christ Church ; the pride of the Oxford
Union, not then a democratic society ; the doors of Parlia-
ment thrown open for him by the ducal patron of a pocket-
borough ; rising to early eminence in the Tory party ;
flattered by powerful statesmen ; courted by highchurch-
men, for whose pious edification he was completing a
treatise which the next spring was to be praised and
demolished by the great Whig essayist, just when he had
won the hand of a well-born heiress. Disraeli, the flippant
bohemian, picking up his education in a library, and com-
pleting it amid the adventures of a voyage to the Levantine
shores of his ancestry ; tossing to the public a series of
brilliant romances, and in the intervals of their composi-
tion encountering the rebuffs of constituencies in a variety
of political guises ; writing a Revolutionary Epic, and three
years later struggling unprotected into parliament as a
Tory ; shining in the eccentric orbit of Gore House ;
storming the doors of a more exclusive society with his
audacity; gaining the ear of the House of Commons with
his epigrams, and soon to settle down on the respectable
path to power with the middle-class fortune of the widow of
his electioneering colleague. He would have been a bold
prophet who at the Coronation had predicted that the
member conspicuous for his oriental curls would become
the intimate counsellor of the Queen, more trusted than
were any of the great English statesmen and nobles
surrounding her throne, that the adventurous cosmopolitan
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 153
would so adapt his genius to the possibilities of British
politics that he would become the chief agent of the
imperial instincts of the Queen, who, without his guidance,
might have been less competent to impart them to her
subjects. It would have been equally incredible to foretell
that the grave young Tory, endowed with all the elements
of British statesmanship, would, when the popular leader of
the Liberals, fail to gain the confidence of his sovereign,
and would finally lose his hold over the people chiefly
because he ignored the growth of the imperial sentiment
which, emanating from the throne, had taken the place in
the popular mind of theories which belonged to the past
political era.
Disraeli on the eve of the Coronation did not display that
reverence for the throne and its occupant which forty years
later he used as a mighty instrument of power and influ-
ence. He wrote to his sister the same week that he could
not go as he had not a court-dress, and, moreover, that he
did not want "to sit dressed like a flunky in the Abbey for
seven or eight hours, and to listen to a sermon by the
Bishop of London." l It was not his objection to picturesque
raiment which inspired this contempt for royal pageants in
the heart of Disraeli the younger, who on his travels called
on British officials dressed in a silk dressing-gown with a
guitar suspended by a broad riband round his neck,2 and
who amazed the dinner-tables of London by his apparition
in velvets and laces. But his disdain was dissipated
and, by some magic, the despised court-dress arrived at
dawn on the morning of the Coronation. So Disraeli
1 Correspondence of Lord Beaconsfield with his sister.
2 Letters from the East, 1832-1857. by Henry James Ross.
154 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
described the ceremony as "the most splendid, various
and interesting affair" at which he had ever been
present.1
It is possible that his own career and, consequently, the
history of the British Empire, might have taken a different
course had he stayed away from Westminster Abbey. For
the change which Disraeli worked in English politics was
to substitute imagination for theory as a rule of conduct.
Gladstone was essentially the man of theory, and whether it
was a dogma inherited from tradition, or the sudden fig-
ment of his suscipient mind, he always required a formula
as a motive of action. This system, which was not peculiar
to any one party, is found alike in his youthful essay on the
State in its relations with the Church, and in his later polity,
which, though in contradiction with his early professions,
bore the stamp of the same mental organism. It was this
system which Disraeli discredited. The education of his
party had not for its end merely " the dishing of the
Whigs," as superficial observers thought. The education
of the Tory party was the first practical step towards the
education of the English nation, which he undoubtedly
accomplished. The imperialist sentiment inspired by the
figure of the sovereign attracting and retaining the
allegiance of subjects scattered throughout a world-wide
dominion was not the creation of Disraeli. But its force
would have been less effective had he not educated the
English people in the art of imagination, his own native
1 Disraeli in a letter to his sister on June 29, 1838, said, " Ralph persuaded me to go," but
it seems probable that Mrs Wyndham Lewis, his future wife, who was the good genius of his
life, had something to do with his change of mind. Although Wyndham Lewis died only in
the previous spring, the widow was already taking a lively interest in Disraeli's doings. To
her he presented his gold coronation medal, and from her balcony in Park Lane he witnessed
the Coronation Review a few days later.
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 155
gift, which cannot but have been quickened by the sight
which he witnessed in Westminster Abbey.
As from his seat above the high altar he looked down
upon the immemorial throne of England he no longer felt
himself, as he had anticipated a few hours before, a sceptic
masquerading as "a flunky," and yawning at a court
sermon. Yet he had no hereditary lot in the past of the
great Abbey. His forefathers had owed no duty to the
kings who lay in the dim chapels behind the festal
scaffolding, and who had sometimes celebrated their
crowning by maltreatment of the Jews. The tombs of
the warriors who had won a resting-place in the aisles
were graven with proud words telling of glorious strife
in which his people had borne no part. The marble
effigies of statesmen, among which his was one day to
stand, marked the graves of English patriots, who had
pleaded noble causes while keeping closed the doors of
the senate to men of the faith in which he was born. The
poets in their sacred corner, though he knew their songs
better than any of their countrymen, had sung in a language
unknown to his ancestors of alien tongue. Even among
the living, among the prelates and nobles, the ministers
and courtiers who crowded round the throne in purple and
crimson and gold, there was not one with whom he could
claim the most distant kinship, nor any one who cared
whether he was dead or alive, except as a possible force to
help them to office. They would utilise his genius in
debate, which six months before had refused to be cowed
by the uproar of a hostile chamber, but they would deny it
that protection and encouragement which the chiefs of each
great party bestowed on their promising recruits, like
" young Gladstone," as he styled his future rival. Disraeli
156 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
once described a fellow-member of the House of Commons
of 1838 as being of the stuff of which under-Secretaries
were made. No chance was ever afforded to him of
earning that reproach, which probably would have never
been uttered had the Tory leaders given him one of those
minor posts in which potential statesmen display their
powers or their incapacity, and only when his party was
wrecked and discredited was he placed at one bound at its
head in the House of Commons. But as he sat aloft,
among his unsympathetic colleagues, whose master he
was soon to be, and looked down upon the statesmen,
Whig and Tory, grouped in the sanctuary, all of whom,
with rare exceptions, despised him, he saw throned above
them the young sovereign crowned with the crown which,
when they had passed away, and he was first in the
counsels of the Queen, would become the emblem and the
binding link of the British Empire. The child of Israel,
who admired Christianity as an Asiatic agency to civilise
the Aryans of the West, must have thrilled with native
pride when the holy oil was poured on the head of the
monarch to the chant of a song of Zion, written " when
Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet anointed Solomon
king." But with the adaptability of his race he may have
conceived a feeling equally sincere of patriotic satisfaction
that he was an English citizen, remembering that it was
the Hebrew educator of Europe who gave the proud
response, " Civis Romanus sum."1
Disraeli, like many men conscious of their pre-eminent
ability, was not disposed to intimacy beyond the circle of
his home. But in spite of his self-isolation, in the midst
1 " Dixit illi : Die mihi si tu civis Romanus es? At ille dixit : Etiam," Act. Ap.
xxii. 27.
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 157
of the gay society in which he moved, and of the suspicion
which kept his political associates aloof from him, he
enjoyed the warm friendship of a chosen few, among whom
were certain members of the House of Commons. There
was the genial Tom Duncombe, who represented in
parliament Finsbury and the wider constituency of the
British drama. Though of very different origin, they both
had experienced the financial vicissitudes which haunt the
bohemian world, and in their more serious pursuits the
well-born Radical, by reason of his relations with the
Chartists, was able to help the Tory catechumen, when, in
the pages of Sybil, he described the condition of the English
working-classes soon after the Coronation.
A literary friendship closer in character was that of
Disraeli with Edward Bulwer, the member for Lincoln,
who was made a baronet three weeks after the Queen was
crowned. It was at his house at a "literary soiree" that
Disraeli first met his wife, and the relations of the two
romancers of similar genius were sympathetic and intimate.
In the short-lived Conservative ministry of 1858 they sat
together in the Cabinet, Bulwer being Secretary for the
Colonies, and in that capacity showed signs of the imperial
spirit which animated the administration of the Colonial
department at the end of the reign. Thus at an Australian
celebration in London, with a prescience which looked
forty years ahead, he said : "It may so happen that in a
distant day England may be in danger. If that day should
ever arrive, I believe that her children will not be unmindful
of her, and that to her rescue across the wide ocean, ships
will come thick and fast, among which there will be but
one cry, 'While Australia lasts England shall not perish."'
He wrote to a Colonial Governor, who \vas also an Oxford
158 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
first-class man :l "It requires a scholar as well as a states-
man fully to appreciate what Bacon calls ' the heroic work
of colonisation.'" It was no doubt his scholarship which
prompted him to send to the Ionian Islands as Lord
High Commissioner Mr Gladstone, who had not yet
been a member of a Liberal Government. The minister
announced that he had chosen him because he was an
eminent Homeric scholar, a reason which showed some sign
of the rise of imagination as a force in British politics. But
Lord Derby, who also had Homeric titles, disappeared
with his romantic lieutenants twelve months later, and
Mr Gladstone returned from his Odyssey in Ithacan
waters, to pursue his theories as a Liberal minister in a
world not ripe for works of imagination, — as the Times
testified the same year, when it denounced the French for
their " suspicious project of the impracticable Suez Canal."2
That visionary scheme when carried out had much to do
with the realisation of Disraeli's dreams of empire. The
patriotic use he made of it also revived memories of his
ancient friendship when he had sent the son of Bulwer-
Lytton, then lying in Westminster Abbey, to proclaim
Queen Victoria Empress of the land which the impracticable
Suez Canal had bound more closely to England.
The friends of Gladstone in 1838 were of a different type.
They neither wrote novels like Bulwer nor got into debt
like Tom Duncombe. There was Sidney Herbert, member
for Wilts, whose comely presence reflected his blameless
and chivalrous character ; there was Lord Lincoln, whose
constituency surrounded the close borough of Newark, which
1 Sir George Bowen : from whose Thirty Years of Colonial Government is taken the passage
from Sir E. Bulwer-Lytton's speech. In one respect the Colonial Secretary showed too much
imagination. He predicted that the aid sent by the Australians would be borne " in navies
of their own." 2 Times, December 31, 1859.
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 159
his father had bestowed on the young hope of the party, and
who, when he became Duke of Newcastle, went as Colonial
Secretary with his present Majesty to Canada, thus taking
part in one of the first steps which made the crown the
binding link between the colonies and the mother-country.1
Older than they was Sir James Graham, who had been in
the House for twenty years as a Whig, and had recently
seceded to the Tories. All these adherents of Sir Robert
Peel became, after his death, members of Lord Aberdeen's
coalition government which drifted into the Crimean War.
In that ministry of disaster was another lifelong friend
of Gladstone who was not a Peelite, and who was
present at the Coronation as Lord Leveson, member
for Morpeth. He had lately made his entry into
public life, which for more than half a century he
adorned, by moving the address in the first session of
the Queen's first parliament, when his childlike ap-
pearance provoked the sneers of Disraeli, who had had
to wait till he was ten years older before he entered the
House of Commons. Those who have listened with delight
to the conversation of Lord Granville have some idea
of the high-bred tone and charm which characterised the
inner political circles of the age when Queen Victoria
was crowned. It is true that in matter of education he was
specially favoured ; for his mother was the gracious daughter
of Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire. Moreover, at his
father's embassy in Paris he had grown up among the last
i The Colonial Office of that day seems to have objected to the visit of the Prince of Wales
to Canada, in 1860, because of the loyalty to the crown which it evoked ! In February 1864,
Sir Henry Taylor, then an official in that department, wrote to the Duke of Newcastle, " As
to our American possessions I have long held, and often expressed the opinion that they are a
sort of damnosa haereditas, and when your Grace and the Prince of Wales were employing
yourselves so successfully in conciliating the Colonists, I thought you were drawing closer
ties which might better be slackened."
160 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD MI.
relics of the old French Court ; he had talked with Talley-
rand, he had seen on the throne the brother of Louis XVI.,
and he had kissed the hand of the daughter of Marie
Antoinette.
Another Etonian Tory member almost as conspicuous as
Gladstone in those days, and some years his senior, was
Winthrop Mackworth Praed. All that remains of him is
his collection of inimitable verses, which, with exact good
breeding and with delicate touch, depict the foibles and
diversions of English society on the eve of its transforma-
tion under the railway era. But though he left behind only
those precious trifles, he had brought from Cambridge a
reputation hardly less than that of Macaulay, whose position
among the Whigs he might have rivalled in the Tory ranks
had not death cut short his brilliant promise. About
the same age as Praed was Charles Villters, whose life
almost filled the entire century. Two years older than
Cobden, nine years- older than Bright, he survived the
former of his colleagues of the Anti-Corn Law League for
thirty-three years and the latter for nine, and neither of them
was with him in parliament when the Queen was crowned.
Till towards the end of the reign his bent figure was a
familiar feature in the streets of London. He took manifest
delight in imparting to the young his reminiscences of the
past, often accompanied by a terse and mordant appreciation
of his political contemporaries.1 He was member for
1 Thus, in the days when the third Earl Grey used, from Howick, to address the readers of
the Times on current political topics, Mr Villiers said, apropos of a letter which his octogen-
arian contemporary had just written : " Lord Grey never believed in anybody but Lord Grey
since 1845, before which time he believed in Lord Howick." On another occasion, referring
to the tragic end of a member of a well-known family in Australia, he said : ' ' Had you never
heard of it? why, it was Bob Lowe who prosecuted him for horse-stealing. No : I am mis-
taken : Bob Lowe must have defended him, because he was hanged."
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 161
Wolverhampton continuously for sixty-three years ; but he
had to wait till he was nearly ninety before becoming father
of the House of Commons because of the rival robustness of
Mr Christopher Talbot of Glamorganshire, who had been in
parliament for eight years when they both witnessed the
Coronation in 1838. Monckton Milnes, the member for
Pontefract, had a more genial wit. Born in the fruitful year
in which Gladstone, Tennyson and Darwin saw the light,
literature was the grave preoccupation of his life and politics
the diversion, from his undergraduate days when he led the
Cambridge delegates to uphold before the Oxford Union the
superiority of the Oxonian Shelley over their own Byron.
His subsequent peerage did honour to Lord Palmerston,
who recommended it, and it was an interesting memorial of
that age of literary breakfasts, when for the last time in
the history of England it might have been possible to
establish a British Academy on the model of Cardinal
Richelieu's great foundation.
The members of the House of Commons in 1838 who
took politics more seriously were of a type as extinct in our
day as is that of the Praeds and the Dicky Milneses. There
was George Grote, the erudite banker, whose philosophic
radicalism secured for him the suffrages of the city of
London, the great Liberal stronghold of those days, and who
became the historian of Greece in order to refute the anti-
democratic deductions drawn by Mr Mitford from the
history of the Athenian Republic. Such an idea is as remote
from the political atmosphere of our day as is that which
provoked Milton's Latin controversy with Salmasius, Contra
Defensionem Regiam, or which inspired the revolutionary
philosophers of France to take their texts from Amyot's
Plutarch and from the Travels of the Young Anacharsis
162 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
in Greece, There was Sir Francis Burdett whose radical-
ism of a more popular school had immured him in the Tower
thirty years before ; but he had now left his boisterous pot-
wollopers of Westminster to become the subdued Conser-
vative colleague of Walter Long in Wiltshire. There was
another Radical baronet whose title also dated from Stuart
times, Sir William Molesworth, a Cornishman of solemn
speech, who became Colonial Secretary in 1855, but he died
before he had time to show if he possessed the secret of
administering the British Empire. There was Thomas
Gibson, later known as Milner Gibson, the schoolfellow of
Disraeli in a suburban "academy," who was not yet a
Radical though he was the first Radical to sit in a Cabinet,
becoming President of the Board of Trade in 1859, on
Cobden's refusal to accept that post in Lord Palmerston's
ministry. There was Joseph Hume, who was one of the
political sponsors of Disraeli, having, with O'Connell, recom-
mended him to the electors of High Wycombe when he
stood as a Radical in 1832. Two years after that Hume
had proposed the repeal of the Corn Laws. In his attacks
on the monarchy he did not meet with the same united
opposition of the Tories, who, like Bradshaw, the member for
Canterbury, had dared to asperse the young queen or who
later helped Colonel Sibthorp to reduce the allowance pro-
posed for her consort. Hume was member for Kilkenny,
but it was not on account of his lukewarm loyalty to the
crown that he was the elect of an Irish constituency. For
of all the Commons present at the Queen's Coronation
there was none that loved her with a warmer devotion than
the member for Dublin, the greatest leader the Irish have
ever had. There can be no doubt that in 1838 Daniel
O'Connell had a much profounder cult for the Queen than
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 163
had his former ally, and now his bitter adversary, Disraeli,
who had to be spurred to go and see her crowned. It is
said that O'Connell was within a little of taking office in
Lord Melbourne's government of 1835. If the warm-
hearted Celtic chieftain, who was at once the idol and the
master of the Irish nation, had been a minister of the crown
at the accession of the young queen, the object of his
chivalrous admiration, the history of the United Kingdom
during her reign might have been transformed. However
that may be, it is certain that the grievances of Ireland
were tenfold greater in 1838 than they were in 1902 ; but
O'Connell was the proud leader of a people and not a
political delegate, so he had to wait for no man's orders
when he decided to go and salute the crown placed on the
head of the sovereign of the Three Kingdoms.
Among the Commons there were several members of
noble families, distinguished in political history, who
deserve to be mentioned in addition to those who have
been already named. The most brilliant among them was
Lord Stanley, who had sat for eleven years in the un-
reformed parliament, where his precocious eloquence had
secured him early office. His oratorical gift was such that
he was said to be the only eminent debater in the House of
Commons who did not make himself a master of his art
at the expense of his audience. As Colonial Secretary in
Lord Grey's ministry, in 1833, he carried through the bill
for Negro Emancipation in the West Indies, but soon found
himself in opposition to the Whigs. Just before the
Coronation he had formally seceded from them, and he was
destined to be three times a Tory Prime Minister of the
Queen. He was the first British statesman to attain to
that triple honour, which was attenuated by the fact that in
164 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
that high capacity he never had a majority in the House of
Commons, and the total duration of his three premierships
amounted only to three years and three-quarters. During
his last administration, under the pressure of his adroit
successor, he took, as he said, "a leap in the dark," and
became the unwilling instrument to enfranchise the
democracy. Of a different character was the work done
for the people of England by Lord Ashley, who was
present as member for Dorset. Yet his long life was not
exclusively devoted to piety and philanthropy. In his
latter days there was no more entertaining talker in
London, on the political events of the first days of the
reign, than the venerable Lord Shaftesbury, whose counsel
was sought in the delicate questions which soon arose
between the court and the ministers. Two noble kinsmen
illustrated a house which had been powerful ever since
William of Orange imported it from Holland. Lord
William Bentinck, the member for Glasgow, bore a name
which deserves a high place on the roll of the makers of
the British Empire. He was a great viceroy of India, and
he had the honour of having his epitaph written in his
lifetime by Macaulay, as an inscription on his statue at
Calcutta. His nephew, Lord George Bentinck, owes his
chief fame on the contrary to a posthumous memorial. He
had left the Whigs with Lord Stanley, and after Sir Robert
Peel's abandonment of the Corn Laws, he devoted what
time he could spare from the turf and the chase to leading
the protectionists against their former chief, in conjunction
with Disraeli, who, when he died, gave him immortality in
a pamphlet disguised as a political biography. His
colleague in the representation of King's Lynn was Sir
Stratford Canning, soon to be known at Constantinople as
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 165
the English Sultan, whose imperious wrath cowed the Turk,
but goaded the like-tempered Nicholas of Russia into the
Crimean War. By the side of these younger sons may be
mentioned the heir to a peerage — Lord Dalmeny, the
member for Stirling, who married Lady Catherine
Stanhope, one of the maids of honour in the Coronation
procession. For he had the unique distinction of being
the only member of the House of Commons during the
Queen's reign who was the father of one of her Prime
Ministers.
The foregoing view of the members of the Lower
House who were invited to the Coronation of Queen
Victoria gives some idea of the variety of talent which it
then contained. Most of the members mentioned were in
parliament before the Reform Bill, and all of them, with
one or two exceptions, were of the class from which the
House of Commons was recruited before the extension of
the franchise. They were nearly all the sons, the relatives,
or the nominees of peers, or else landowners of ancient or
recent origin. They were not only men of the most varied
ability, but they were also representative of the most varied
opinions. It is probable that the examples of conspicuous
ability were more numerous than the House ever displayed
in the latter half of the reign of Queen Victoria. A criticism
which the enumeration of their names suggests is that
these distinguished members of parliament of different ages
and of various opinions being principally drawn from one
class — the landed interest — the commerce, the industry, and
the finance of the country were not adequately represented.
Among the members mentioned there were persons of
manufacturing or mercantile origin, such as Sir Robert
Peel or Mr Gladstone. But neither of those eminent men
166 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
came into parliament from the counting-house or the
factory ; they had not, by reason of their parentage, any
special knowledge of commercial or economic subjects ;
their fortunes were not dependent on the fluctuations of
business ; and for all practical purposes they belonged to
what Mr Disraeli called the territorial oligarchy. This
oligarchy was about to be invaded by " the fatal drollery "
of the representative system, to use another of his
expressions. The invasion had indeed commenced. Not
only had the franchise been extended, but a redistribution
of seats had been effected, giving the right of sending
burgesses to parliament to all the great towns, many of
which had been without representation before 1832.
Before drawing any general conclusions from this new
state of things, we will glance at the representation of the
chief industrial centres of Great Britain to see if the three
general elections, which had already taken place on the
new franchise, had caused a sensible alteration in the
composition of the House of Commons. We will turn
first to Lancashire which was, and still is, regarded as
the barometer of English politics. Liverpool was repre-
sented in parliament before 1832. For reasons of local
interest it did not follow the political movement of the
manufacturing towns of the county palatine. The aboli-
tion of the slave trade in the West Indies had deeply
affected the merchants of the great seaport, and Mr
Gladstone as a Liverpool man supported his fellow-towns-
men on that colonial question. The senior member for
the borough was Lord Sandon, the son of Lord Harrowby,
who in Canning's administration had been a colleague of
Huskisson, the chief pride of Liverpool, and the first
victim of the railways. His colleague had been William
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 167
Ewart, a Liverpool man of precisely the same social type
as Gladstone ; an Etonian who had a brilliant career
at Christ Church, and who before the Reform Bill had
been member for a close borough. He was an advanced
reformer and had lost his seat at the election of 1837. It
is clear therefore that the representation of Liverpool was
not affected by the Reform Bill.
The senior member for Manchester in 1838 was likewise
not a product of the new franchise. Poulett Thompson
was the son of a London merchant in the Russian trade,
and was member for Dover six years before the Reform
Bill. He was associated with one of the first steps taken
towards the consolidation of the Colonial Empire, being
the first governor of the United Provinces of Ontario and
Quebec, which were confederated on Lord Durham's re-
commendation ; but he died in 1841, soon after his appoint-
ment and his subsequent elevation to the peerage as Lord
Sydenham. His colleague was on the contrary a thorough-
bred Manchester man, Mark Philips, who afterwards
became prominent in the anti-Corn Law agitation. A
number of the members for the neighbouring towns were
also connected with the local manufactures. Joseph
Brotherton, member for Salford, was a cotton spinner ; John
and William Fielden, who represented Oldham and
Blackburn, were also cotton spinners, and were of Quaker
origin ; the second member for Blackburn was a calico
printer ; the member for Bury was a woollen dyer ; and the
members for Bolton, Ashton-under-Lyne and Rochdale
were similarly engaged in the trades of the district. But
Wigan chose for one of its representatives a local land-
owner of the house of Standish.
In the Yorkshire industrial region the new commercial
1 68 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
interest was less generally represented. Leeds had done
itself the honour to elect Macaulay as its first member after
the Reform Bill ; but he had resigned on being appointed
to the Indian Council and was not in parliament at the
Coronation. He was succeeded by Edward Baines, a
journalist of great enterprise and an active nonconformist,
whose colleague in 1838 was Sir William Molesworth who,
as we have seen, was a Radical squire from Cornwall. The
senior member for Halifax was Charles Wood, the heir to
a Georgian baronetcy, who became Chancellor of the Ex-
chequer, and in remembrance of his constituency adopted,
when he was raised to the peerage, the historical title of
the illustrious " trimmer." Sheffield and Bradford were
represented by men connected with the staple trades of
those towns, one of whom bore a name which was ennobled
towards the end of the reign ; but Wakefield sent to parlia-
ment a Lascelles. Further north, Glasgow, where commerce
and industry had trebled the population in fifty years, chose
for its senior member one who was neither a Scotsman nor
a man of business, Lord William Bentinck.
Birmingham was in 1838 a stronghold of the Chartists,
who the next year made it the scene of a riot so prolonged
as to have the air of a revolution. Its first representatives
consequently were men of a very different type to the
reformers sent to parliament by the newly enfranchised
towns of Lancashire. The politics of the Free Traders and
anti-Corn Law Leaguers of the Manchester district were
based on commercial principles. The Birmingham Radicals
were political theorists, who did not choose their members
of parliament on account of their interest in the trade of
the Midlands. Moreover, the Chartist leaders, notably
Feargus O'Connor, were protectionists, and this fact further
THE CROWNING OF QUEEN VICTORIA 169
complicated the advanced politics of the town which twenty
years later sent to the House of Commons the great
champion of Free Trade, John Bright. The two members
for Birmingham in 1838, Joshua Scholefield and Thomas
Attwood, were not, however, sons of the people, but were
both local bankers. The latter was chosen by the Chartists
to present their celebrated petition to parliament just a
year after the Coronation of the Queen. But though the
leaders of the Chartists were doctrinaires of an extreme
school, who urged with violence the superiority of political
to social or economic reform, they were not necessarily
republicans. Indeed the famous " six points " of the
Charter did not touch the monarchy or even the con-
stitutional position of the House of Lords. Much later
in the reign Birmingham radicalism became vaguely
associated in the public mind with republicanism ; but this
was a passing phase of extreme opinion which had no
connection with the old Chartist movement.
At that time the influence of Birmingham did not extend
to the neighbouring towns of the Midland coalfield, and
Wolverhampton was represented by Charles Villiers, a
cadet of a noble family and an ardent Free Trader. At the
other end of Staffordshire the newly-created borough of
Stoke-upon-Trent returned two Tory manufacturers. The
adjoining county of Chester was then almost entirely a
rural area ; but its silk trade, which had its chief seat at
Macclesfield, was represented by the senior member for
that town, John Brocklehurst. In the rising commercial
region of South Wales, Merthyr Tydvil sent to parlia-
ment an ironmaster, Josiah Guest, the founder of a family
which in the second generation was raised to the peerage.
The other commercial constituency of the West, the ancient
i/o THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
city of Bristol, was not a creation of the Reform Bill, and
its two members were the sons of great landowners in the
counties of Somerset and Gloucester.
One or two of the members of parliament mentioned in
the foregoing enumeration seem to have been absent from
the Coronation. But the great majority of the elect of the
new constituencies repaired to Westminster Abbey to salute
their young queen, whose accession had called forth a
unanimity of sentiment in the hearts of Englishmen of all
classes and of all opinions such as had not been expressed
in the land since the reign of Elizabeth. At all other
great epochs of national satisfaction a section of the
community had abstained. At the restoration of Charles
II. the army sullenly refused to take part in the general
joy. When the arrival of William of Orange gave wide-
spread relief to the nation, the clergy and the country
gentlemen in England stood aloof with discontent, as did
the Covenanters in Scotland, with whom they had no
other feeling in common. It would be difficult to find
in English history another occasion in which the entire
nation had united in a common outburst of sentiment,
since the days when the Spanish Armada threatened the
kingdom in 1588, just two centuries and a half before
the Coronation of Queen Victoria. The circumstances
were different, but the patriotic enthusiasm was equally
unanimous.
CHAPTER III
THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION AND THE MONARCHY
OUR review of the composition of the House of
Commons in the year when the Queen was
crowned will have given the impression that
after three general elections, under the new conditions
established in 1832, the character of the Chamber was
not much altered, as regards the social origin of the
members, from that of the unreformed parliament. A
closer analysis conveys a more vivid idea of the prepon-
derance maintained in the House by the landed interest.
Eighty of the members of the Queen's first parliament were
noble lords — Irish peers, or lords by courtesy of whom the
great majority were eldest sons ; about ninety were the
untitled sons or brothers of peers, and eighty were baronets,
who then, when a baronetcy was seldom conferred, as in
our days, as a reward of successful commerce, were nearly
all country gentlemen of large estate. But these members
of the House of Commons were little more than one-half
of those who were interested in the land. The squires, who
boasted of no other distinction than their broad acres and
their rent-rolls, formed a sturdy phalanx in the reformed
parliament, to show that the cause was not yet in operation
which would reduce their ranks in the Lower House of
legislature.
Apart from the exceptional case of Birmingham, the
i;2 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
representatives sent to the reformed House of Commons
by the populous towns could be roughly divided into two
categories. The majority were men who, by reason of
their birth, associations or independent wealth, belonged
to the class to which parliament was open before the
Reform Bill. The minority was composed of persons
actively engaged in business, who were in most cases
identified with the commercial prosperity of their con-
stituencies. This minority, which was destined to increase
long before any new parliamentary reform was enacted,
was the product not of the extension of the franchise
enacted by Lord Grey and Lord John Russell, but of the
redistribution of seats, which gave representation to in-
dustrial centres just when the industrial revolution was
beginning. It was not the invention of the ten-pound
householder which caused Salford to elect a cotton spinner,
or Stoke-upon-Trent a potter, or Merthyr Tydvil an iron-
master. These representatives were sent to parliament
because the towns or districts, in which they carried on
their business, became parliamentary constituencies at the
moment when employers of labour, owing to the introduc-
tion and perfection of machinery, were becoming wealthy
personages of local importance and influence. Had the
borough franchise been fixed by the Reform Bill at a
higher or a lower rate, had the electors in the new con-
stituencies been fifteen-pound householders, or seven-
pound householders, the result of the elections between
1832 and 1838 would have been practically the same as
it was.
If the introduction of that new class into the House of
Commons had been the result of extended suffrage there
would have been no need for it to wait for the Reform
THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION AND THE MONARCHY 173
of 1832 before entering parliament. For in the old days
there were a large number of towns enjoying a franchise
much more democratic than that which was bestowed on
the new boroughs by the Reform Bill. Westminster,
Southwark, Liverpool, Bristol, Norwich, Northampton,
Nottingham and Leicester were in that case. The repre-
sentatives of the popular vote in those places, during the
half century preceding the Reform Bill, included Edmund
Burke, Charles Fox, Sheridan, Windham, Romilly,
Canning, Huskisson and Spencer Perceval; and among the
members, eminent or obscure, for those important centres
of population, it was rare to find one like Huskisson, who
was connected with the local interests of the constituency.
One reason for this was that the conditions under which
commercial and industrial enterprise was carried on were,
until the eve of the Victorian era, such that the merchant
or the manufacturer could not leave his counting-house
or his workshop to devote himself to politics in then
distant London, even in the rare cases where he was
rich enough to contest elections or set up a town
establishment.
The great change in the social origin of the parliamentary
representatives of the nation about to take place in the reign
of Queen Victoria was not due to parliamentary reform,
which had effected only a slight modification at the time of
the Coronation. It was the result, first, of the invention of
industrial machinery, and of the application of steam to the
new mechanism ; and, secondly, it was due to the introduction
of railways and steamships, with the consequent development
of inland commerce, and of the export and import trades.
The second of these causes was the more powerful. It
revolutionised all the conditions of human existence and
1/4 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
created new social classifications. It is not surprising
therefore to find, though the fact is not always recognised,
that a much greater change took place in the character of
the House of Commons in the thirty years which inter-
vened between the accession of Queen Victoria and the
Reform Bill of 1867, during which no change took place in
the electoral franchise, than in the previous period of thirty
years, which began on the morrow of the deaths of Pitt and
Fox, and which ended after the supposed revolution effected
by the Reform Bill of I832.1 If steam had not been applied
to industrial machinery and to mechanical means of trans-
port, and if the consequent social revolution had not taken
place, the establishment of a suffrage even wider than that
enjoyed in England in the twentieth century would have
modified the character of parliamentary representation in a
relatively small degree.
No man had studied this phase in the evolution of
English political life more profoundly or more sagaciously
than Disraeli. To the end of his remarkable career his
discernment was always that of an alien who regarded every
question in the land in which he sojourned, and which he
sincerely loved, with a lucid and detached objectivity.
Sometimes his florid imagination dazzled his vision : some-
times it unduly quickened his ambition for power.2 But
whatever policy he pursued, whatever errors he committed,
his action never sprang from prejudice. His political
friends and rivals, his associates and his adversaries, were
1 As far as can be judged from a comparison of the lists of the House of Commons, the
greatest change in its composition and character took place at the elections of 1857, a
quarter of a century after the passage of the Reform Bill, when one hundred and fifty new
members entered parliament.
2 He once said to the late Lord Lytton : ' ' Man is a predatory animal. The worthiest
objects of his chase are women and power. After I married Mary Ann I desisted from the
one and devoted my life to the pursuit of the other."
THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION AND THE MONARCHY 175
all of them Britons steeped in preconceived ideas from
the necessity of their origin and education. No native of a
country, whatever his superiority over his fellows, can take
a purely detached view of its interests. The strength of
William of Orange in adjusting the affairs of England after
the abdication of James II., and of Napoleon in organising
the French Revolution, lay in the fact, that apart from their
genius, the successor of the Stuarts was a Dutchman and the
reconstructor of France was an Italian. Disraeli was not
called upon to rule the land of his domicile ; but, as a con-
summate parliamentary leader and as a powerful minister
of the crown, he played a dominant part in guiding the
English nation in the early stages of a revolution, which is
still proceeding, and which is of infinitely graver moment in
the world's history than the Revolution of 1688 or even the
greater movement of 1789.
From what Disraeli wrote in his romances shortly after
the Coronation of Queen Victoria, it is clear that he
anticipated some of the changes which were then rapidly
approaching, in consequence of the progress and tenden-
cies of modern commercial society in the railway era.
He did not fall into the error which John Stuart Mill
attributed to Tocqueville. He did not confound the effects
of democracy with the effects of civilisation.1 When in
1867 he announced that the representation of the people
should cease to be the test question which decided general
elections, and which divided the two great political parties,
he was aware of two things. He knew that in the genera-
tion which had elapsed since the Queen carne to the throne,
the territorial class had ceased to be omnipotent in politics,
not as the consequence of reform legislation, but as the
1 Dissertations, etc., 1859, Vol. II. "M. de Tocqueville on Democracy in America."
176 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
result of commercial progress, under the changed conditions
of production and of transport. He also foresaw that the
democracy when enfranchised would not, in its vote, be
revolutionary or even liberal. Examples both at home and
abroad pointed to this. In France the first result of the
introduction of manhood suffrage, after the Revolution of
1848, had been to drive liberalism out of that country
(whither it has never returned) and to establish an
autocratic and conservative form of government. In
England, as we have just seen, the populous towrns, which
enjoyed a wide suffrage before 1832, did not send men of
extreme ideas or of popular origin to parliament, even
at moments of public agitation. They chose as their mem-
bers some of the most illustrious statesmen of a great age.
Nor did these democratic constituencies encourage their
representatives to cultivate advanced opinions, as Burke
found out when he had to give up his seat for Bristol
because his constituents disapproved his efforts on behalf of
religious liberty ; while twenty years later Northampton,
with a more democratic franchise, returned Spencer Perceval,
who was a Tory Prime Minister in the most reactionary
days of Toryism.
Mr Bright, whose fame as a popular orator began in the
year of the Coronation, but who did not enter parliament
till five years later, was a statesman as full of prejudices as
Mr Disraeli was exempt from them. From their different
standpoints they testified to the jealousy with which the
new capitalist class regarded the territorial oligarchy. The
portrait drawn, with no unsympathetic pen, by Disraeli of
the Lancashire manufacturer, soon after the Queen was
crowned, may be compared with Bright's speeches on
Reform twenty years after that event, by which time the
THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION AND THE MONARCHY 177
rich industrial classes had made great strides politically and
socially. - The cotton spinner of Coningsby with his " I
defy any peer to crush me," is the counterpart of John
Bright in 1858 telling his constituents that just as they
might see "No dogs admitted here" inscribed over the
entrance of their public gardens, so there was a similar
inscription over the portals of the House of Lords which
said, "No traders are admitted here."1 Before his life
ended Mr Bright saw the development of the movement,
already in progress in 1858, which had among its results the
deposition of the landed class as a political oligarchy and
the exaltation of the rich trader, who, no longer debarred
from the House of Lords, has since been called within its
precinct too frequently, in the opinion of certain philo-
sophical observers.2 A persistent fallacy underlies Mr
Bright's speeches. With a curious lack of foresight and of
capacity to see what was going on at his doors, he believed
that the men of his class, when their alleged disabilities
were removed, would share his views on the Church, which
he regarded as a preserve for " the aristocracy," on the
Game Laws, which he held were maintained for the pleasure
of "dukes and lords," and on the colonies, which he treated
as an expensive inheritance of the evil days before the
emancipation of the middle classes. The Church has
become a popular institution, and owes half of its increased
endowments to the munificence of men who have grown
rich in trade. Game preserving would have languished
without the sporting tastes of those who have acquired
wealth in business. The binding of the colonies to the
1 Speech at Birmingham, October 27, 1858.
2 e.g. Mr W. E. H. Lecky: "The immense place given to undistinguished wealth in the
modern peerage has contributed to lower its character," Democracy and Liberty, c. iv.
II
178 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
mother-country, under the symbolic influence of the Crown,
would have been less effective without the practical
methods and energy of the commercial class, of which
a conspicuous exemplar, when the reign of King Edward
began, was a statesman whose antecedents were almost
identical with those of Mr Bright, and who was his col-
league in the representation of Birmingham.
Mr Bright, though his eloquent command of pure Eng-
lish moved the hearts of the populace, was no democrat.
He had a conservative mind, which looked, in its limited
horizon, for the abolition only of such institutions as
impeded the predominance of the middle classes, while it
deprecated an indiscriminate suffrage which should put too
much power in the hands of the democracy. Hence he
ignored the problems which were surging above that
horizon in consequence of the rise of the commercial class.
That that class should ever have its supremacy challenged
by its wage-earning dependents does not seem to have
appeared to his view. Consequently he did not foresee the
great controversies between capital and labour which are
the issue of the new era, and which, throughout the British
Empire in the reign of King Edward, have made of
secondary importance many questions still unsettled, which
agitated reformers when Queen Victoria was crowned.
Mr Bright lived to see the landed interest no longer the
depository of political power ; but its deposition was not
effected by parliamentary reform, nor by the repeal of the
Corn Laws. They were but secondary causes of its decline.
It was the steam-engine, and its use in the locomotive, in
the mine and in the factory, which altered the character of
the House of Commons, and which brought the trader into
the House of Lords. Without the railways and similar
THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION AND THE MONARCHY 179
modern inventions manhood suffrage might have been
established, and the composition of parliament would
not have been sensibly affected. With the steam-engine
invented and applied to traffic, transport and industry, a
century before Queen Victoria was crowned, when Montes-
quieu was writing his Esprit des Lois, the French Revolu-
tion would have never taken place ; for the privileges of
the nobility, and the absolute powers of the King, could
not have withstood the advance of modern civilisation, and
there would have been no need to storm the Bastille or to
abolish the monarchy.
The assertion of Mr Bright that traders were not ad-
mitted to the House of Lords was not inaccurate as applied
to the past. In the annals of the banking-house of Smith,
Payne and Smiths, which remained a venerable landmark in
the city of London until the year when King Edward was
crowned, it is recorded that when a member of the firm was
raised to the peerage at the end of the eighteenth century,
Mr Pitt insisted on his retiring from the bank.1 It was not
a period in which a fastidious choice was exercised in the
creation of new peers. It was on the eve of the Union of
Great Britain with Ireland, which was facilitated by a whole-
sale distribution of peerages, some of the recipients of which
were persons of doubtful origin and character. Even in
the less lavish days when George III. was young, it was
possible to raise to the House of Lords a Bubb Dodington,
the corrupt and ignoble son of an apothecary. Yet though
Mr Pitt resolved to extend the peerage into a larger body
1 This action of Mr Pitt was referred to in the contemporary rhyme, ' ' Bob Smith lives here ;
Billy Pitt made him a peer, and took the pen from behind his ear. " The first Lord Carring-
ton, who was thus referred to, was one of the sixteen peers born in the reign of George II.
who survived till the Coronation of Queen Victoria. But his name does not appear on the
roll of the Barons who did homage to the Queen, and he died three months later.
i8o THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
than heretofore, representative of the opulence of the
country, he enforced the rule that the assumption of a
coronet should entail cessation from traffic, even in the
case of bankers, whose commerce was held to be more
dignified than that of a dealer or of an artificer. The
principle to which Mr Pitt adhered would be difficult to
apply in the twentieth century. Yet it cannot be decried,
in view of the inconvenience and scandal which, in our time,
sometimes result from the association of members of the
peerage with financial and commercial undertakings. No
doubt the prejudice against trade, as an occupation or means
of livelihood of certain categories of citizens, was a purely
artificial sentiment, as are, indeed, all those on which social
distinctions are based, whatever their historical origin. But
it was an impediment to materialism, which at that period
was only a philosophic term and not the predominant factor
of everyday life.
Under the old state of things, which, as Mr Bright in-
dicated, had not come to an end twenty years after Queen
Victoria was crowned, a country gentleman of small estate
or a cadet of noble family, blessed with numerous offspring,
not unfrequently put a son into trade or into one of the
inferior professions which did not carry any social con-
sideration.1 Such a father would explain the advantage
or the disadvantage of adopting that course. He would
point out to his boy that if he joined the army, the Church
or the bar, the highest society of the land would be open
1 On the death of the last Duke of Cleveland the inquest before the Committee of Privileges
of the House of Lords, touching the succession to one of his minor titles, showed how in the
eighteenth century the younger branches of great territorial families followed this course. The
heir to the barony, created in 1699, substantiated his claim by proving his descent through a
series of attorneys, who, though of lineage which would have been esteemed noble in those con-
tinental courts which did not exact sixteen quarterings, had adopted a branch of the legal
profession at a period when it enjoyed no social consideration.
THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION AND THE MONARCHY 181
to him, although his means might be small. If, on the
contrary, he entered a mercantile house or a firm of manu-
facturers, he might attain great wealth, but he would not be
admitted into the social sphere which his brothers, the ensign,
the vicar, or the counsellor, frequented. Thus was the
salutary law of compensation observed. In the twentieth
century the contrary principle obtains. The youth who
sedulously haunts the Baltic or Capel Court by day, by
night is convoked to adorn and to instruct the most bril-
liant circles of society, which, though no longer exclusive,
would welcome less warmly the brother waiting for briefs
at the Temple or on leave from his marching regiment.
Although the line of demarcation between the trading and
territorial classes was clearly defined in the old era, there
was a frequent movement to and fro across the boundary.
Early in the eighteenth century the untitled gentry, in which
pride of birth was a tradition developed during the Civil
War, and which now, under the statutory monarchy, was
beginning to share political influence with the nobility, had
frequent relations with the trading class. The experience of
Gibbon's father is not an isolated one at this period. The
son of a Kentish squire of respectable pedigree, he was
apprenticed to a merchant clothworker in London before
he inherited his acres and became member for Petersfield.
Moreover, there was never in England, as on the continent,
an aristocratic caste shut off from all connection with the rest
of the community. The nobility not only was perpetually
renewed by fresh creations, but it remained an integral part
of the great mass of the nation, because its progeny in the
junior branches " redescended into the bourgeoisie," to adopt
a French expression, without privilege, without title and
without precedence. This was to the great advantage of the
182 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
nation. Society was thus not divided into horizontal layers,
to break through which in France the first onslaught of the
Revolution was directed.
While England was thus preserved by its social organisa-
tion, under the crown, from the ills which led to the French
Revolution, the limited intermingling of the landed class
with the commercial class did not tend to exalt the influence
or social position of the latter. This was due to the rise in
land values, which removed the country gentlemen from the
range of competition with the trading community on the score
of wealth. Hence, by the time that George III. came to
the throne, the territorial class, titled or untitled,had become
the political masters of England. Henceforth, until railways
and machinery disarranged the fabric of society, it was
necessary to be a possessor of land in order to enjoy politi-
cal influence, and few who were not landowners or protected
by the landed interest, took any part in the government of
the country. Not that the territorial class was a stagnant
caste. In spite of the costly and intricate legal formalities
attending the transfer of real property, estates were con-
stantly changing hands, and the nabobs from India, the
planters from the West Indies, as well as the successful
bankers and merchants from the City, and the ennobled
lawyers, invested large portions of their accumulations in
the purchase of land and in the consequent acquisition of
parliamentary and social influence.
The governmental class, thus composed of the lords of
the soil and of their connections, formed a highly agreeable
and interesting society which performed splendid services
to the kingdom. It was not an ideal society, and nothing
would be easier than to draw up a catalogue of its short-
comings. To mention only one of the abuses which it did
THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION AND THE MONARCHY 183
not discourage, political jobbery was almost as rife under its
rule as under a democratic republic in our time. But what-
ever its failings, it produced for over a hundred years a race
of statesmen, high-minded, patriotic, cultivated and eloquent,
such as no other community ever brought forth in the same
space of time, and the like of whom England will never see
again. They brought our country to a commanding place
among European nations. They established the public
credit. They encouraged the growth of our commerce,
which gave birth to a maritime power which as yet has
never been assailed. They and the institutions they ad-
ministered compelled the admiration of our neighbours on
the continent, from the days when Voltaire and Montesquieu
took from our shores the impression that the English system
of government approached the limits of human perfection,
down to the period when the French Revolution had done
its work, and Guizot thought that the Monarchy of July
would become the pattern for all the nations of Europe,
because it was fashioned on the English model. The day
is past for parliamentary institutions to be considered the
universal remedy for the ills to which nations are subject.
But their failure in lands peopled by men not of our race
has not destroyed the tradition of the commanding figures
which gave to Westminster its classic fame. The examples
of the Great Commoner and of his mighty son, of Edmund
Burke and of Charles Fox, are held up for imitation to
young men entering political life, even in countries which
had to surfer from the policy of some of those statesmen.
When Mr Gladstone died certain of his public acts were
criticised by foreign politicians : but European opinion was
unanimous in its regret at the disappearance of the great
parliamentarian, who a boy had sat at the feet of Canning,
1 84 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
and in early manhood had been the colleague of Peel. Nor
did that remarkable man, amid his many recantations, ever
abjure the tradition of politic.il life in which he was bred. In
the conservative corners of his heart he loved the old system
of territorial patronage, and recognised the utility of the close
boroughs, which, from the election of the elder Pitt for Old
Sarum in 1735 to his own election for Newark in 1832, had
opened the doors of parliament to an illustrious succession
of statesmen, in the most glorious century of parliamentary
history.
One advantage of the existence of a governmental class
was that young men who were born in it lived their
early years in an atmosphere of parliamentary and patriotic
ambition. The boyhood of the younger Pitt was not an
exceptional experience, save for the accident of his ill-
health, which detained him beneath the paternal roof when
he would otherwise have been at school. The home of
Lord Chatham had its counterpart in sixty country houses in
the sixty years which divided his death from the Corona-
tion of Queen Victoria. The education of a youth of
promise in those days was adapted to form a statesman.
He was taught from childhood that he and his fellows were
the repositories of a trust, the custody of which would
endow them with power and place, but would also call for
the exercise of great qualities. The conversations which
he heard at his father's table had one refrain, that the
most glorious scene in which an Englishman could move
with dignity and honour was the floor of the House of
Commons or of the House of Lords, which was then a
place of debate, and not a chamber of registration. It is
useless to regret that such homes no longer exist in
England. They were as incapable of surviving the com-
THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION AND THE MONARCHY 185
mercial era as would have been the salons of the ancient
monarchy in France, had not the Revolution come first.
But while they lasted they formed an admirable training-
ground for servants of the crown.
In the present day there is no governmental class.
There are a certain number of men of good family, to use
a conventional expression, who follow a parliamentary
career, and it is one of the happiest features of our modern
political life, in contrast with that of many other countries,
that no category of citizens is excluded from it, not even the
highest. The heirship to or kinship with a peerage is not an
impediment to a politician. Indeed it sometimes gives him in
the political race that start of twenty minutes which Wilkes
said was all the advantage good looks had over ugliness in
the favour of a woman. But it gives him little else, unless
he goes to the House of Lords, when he will be eligible
for certain posts reserved for peers. To enter the House
of Commons he has no seat reserved for him as a family
appanage. If he be related to a powerful minister, that fact
may procure him early office after he has entered parlia-
ment ; but this is an advantage which also falls to the lot
of the relatives of ministers who owe nothing to the accident
of birth. Both before his election, and after it, he has to
contend on terms of equality with men whose social pre-
cedence is inferior to his. Such abrogation of ancient
privilege might call forth the unalloyed joy of reformers, if
new inequalities had not taken the place of the old.
The governmental caste has gone from our political
system, as an exclusive nursery for statesmen ; but its
disappearance is due less to the admission of the democracy
to political power than to the new social conditions which
have been produced in the commercial era. Under those
1 86 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
new conditions the inheritors of once powerful names have
no longer any peculiar qualifications for government, ex-
cepting those which are within the reach of all men who
have the taste for a political career, provided that their
means permit them to devote their time to public affairs.
The reason is that, while under the new order of things the
divisions between rich and poor have perhaps become
wider, the divisions between rich and rich have been
broken down. Wealth under the new conditions of exist-
ence has become the great leveller of the wealthy. The
depreciation of the value of agricultural land which took
place as the result of those new conditions, during the
reign of Queen Victoria, has been only one of the many
causes of this change. To enumerate its principal causes
would be to recount the history of modern progress in the
last sixty years of the nineteenth century. It must suffice
to say that the end of it all has been the substitution of a
large and unlimited society based on the possession of
wealth, for a small and limited society based on the
possession of political power — which, for want of a more
exact term, may be styled an aristocracy. The old aristo-
cratic society was wealthy and the new plutocratic society
is fruitful in politicians ; but if politics were banished from
the latter, only a minor part of its organism would be
affected, whereas the government of the country was the
main and almost the sole object of life in the former.
The consequence of the partial absorption of the aris-
tocracy by the plutocracy is that, while many members of
the former still take the most active part in politics, and
rise to eminence in parliament, the art of government is
not its exclusive preoccupation as a class. There are a
certain number of peers, in our time, who merit the name
THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION AND THE MONARCHY 187
of statesmen in the highest acceptation of the term ; there are
many peers who, by their ability and devotion to the service
of the Crown and of the country, amply justify the retention
of their order as an Estate of the realm. But the atmosphere
in which they live, and in which they have been brought
up, has nothing in common with that which produced
the statesmen who stood around the throne when Queen
Victoria was crowned. Their social and domestic sur-
roundings, in this respect, often do not differ from those in
which a financier moves, who cares nothing about politics
except as a factor in the fluctuations of the money market.
Their own connection with the City is sometimes more
intimate than with Westminster. Consequently, nowadays,
because a man bears a name famous in the annals of
parliament, it is not presumptive evidence, as formerly,
that he takes a special interest in politics or that he brings
up his sons to do so. It may be that his interest in
public life is only secondary, and that he encourages his
sons to earn or to increase their income by commerce or by
speculation. There are no doubt historic homes in which
the children are brought up in the high ideals of the past,
just as in other similar homes they are expected to attend
family prayers : but the domestic practice in either case is
only an idiosyncrasy and not the tradition of a class.
The commercialisation of all sections of the community
is perhaps an inevitable incident of modern progress. It is
nevertheless attended by untoward results. At a time
when the problems of secondary education are calling for
attention in England, the men who are engaged in it in our
public schools are, from daily observation, alive to the disad-
vantages to which the young generation is now exposed. At
Eton, which more than any similar foundation has suffered from
1 88 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
the changed conditions of society, eminent masters, who are
devoted to the cause of education, declare that the greatest
difficulty which confronts them is the evil influence of the un-
intelligent homes 1 whence their pupils come. It is not only
boys of the newly enriched class, sent to Eton for unworthy
motives and in alarming numbers, who display the traces
of debased home-training. Families of illustrious and
patriotic record, in the annals of the state, sometimes bring
up their sons in an atmosphere of self-indulgent materialism,
which the noble tradition and excellent discipline of a great
public school are powerless to correct. Eton is a national
institution which is the microcosm of English society. In
the old days a small number of boys of unrefined ante-
cedents went there, and, to the advantage of themselves and
of the community, they acquired a high and healthy tone
from the happier majority which had been brought up in
nice homes. It is to be feared that the situation has been
reversed both at Eton and in the society which it re-
presents. Shortly before Queen Victoria was crowned,
Mackworth Praed, whom we have remarked as member
for Aylesbury, said that, in his Eton days, he "wondered
what they meant by stock, and wrote delightful sapphics."
Praed came of a banking family in which there might have
been some excuse for educating infants in financial terms.
But at the present day, without any hereditary connection
with the City, an ingenuous Etonian is capable of knowing
more about trusts and contangos than about trochees and
caesuras. When we see the undignified luxury which
seems to be the highest ideal of certain societies we may
1 The epithet "unintelligent" in this application is taken from a letter written by a
distinguished Eton master ; while one of his colleagues writing on the same subject does not
hesitate to describe the rich homes, from which many of the Eton boys come in the twentieth
century, as ' ' illiterate. "
THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION AND THE MONARCHY 189
hope that the hereditary monarchy will be the British
nation's great safeguard to protect it from falling into
materialism, which menaces all commercial peoples in the
new era.
It is sometimes said that the age which came to an end
when Queen Victoriawas crowned, and which may be counted
as having coincided with the century subsequent to the entry
into public life of the elder Pitt, was marked by coarseness in
high places and by other features which denoted the preva-
lence of a materialistic spirit in the nation. But materialism
is inseparable from human nature, and the forms which the
malady took in that period were less subtle and penetrating
than those with which it besets modern communities.
Whatever the faults of the society which assembled at the
Coronation of Queen Victoria, it did not take its measure
of men by the length of their purses. It was the last
muster of a society which, with various talent, had pro-
duced Gray's " Elegy" and Cowper's " Task" and Byron's
" Childe Harold " ; it had inspired the noble canvases of
Gainsborough, Reynolds, Romney and Lawrence ; and in
its own domain it had fostered the statesmanship and the
eloquence of Pitt and Fox, of Burke, Sheridan and
Canning. By what it has left behind, its titles to refinement
may best be judged. Moreover, those who, in their youth,
have had the happiness of knowing the last survivors of
that age, or who have frequented some historic house while
it was still the sanctuary of tradition, are able to form some
estimate of the qualities of a noble race of men and women,
and to compare their manners and surroundings with those
of their grandchildren.
Before taking leave of the brilliant assemblage which
was grouped round the throne when Queen Victoria was
190 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
lifted into it, we should notice that the dignified personages
composing it were not members of an ancient nobility.
Few of them, even of those whose fathers and grand-
fathers had been in power and place during the eighteenth
century, were of families which had been noble, in the
English sense, a hundred years. Their stately manners,
which were those of men and women born to rule,
had not been handed down to them by crusading or
feudal ancestors. The year that the House of Hanover
came to the British throne the Spectator?- criticising
the methods of pedigree makers in those days, said,
" There is scarce a beggar in the streets who would not
find himself descended from some great man." It was only
in this sense that many of the political families, which were
powerful in the eighteenth century, were of ancient lineage.
Only one or two of the great houses, such as the Howards
and the Seymours, had held high place in the land before
the Reformation. The nobility of a few of them dated
from the dissolution of the monasteries, as did that of the
Russells, or from the early Stuart period when the Caven-
dishes were ennobled. The reigns of Charles II. and of
William and Mary were the most fruitful, before the
eighteenth century began, in peerages which produced
powerful politicians in the great age of parliamentary
government. But much of the nobility which, at the
Coronation of Queen Victoria, had reached either the
highest rank in the peerage or, short of that, a position of
great prestige, owing to personal achievement or territorial
influence, was so recent, that it had been created almost
within the memory of persons present in Westminster
Abbey. The oldest peer who was there was born, as
i October 27, 1714. The authorship of the number is unknown.
THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION AND THE MONARCHY 191
we have seen, in 1752. It was not till 1761 that the
Grosvenors came forth from the ranks of country gentle-
men and obtained their first step in the peerage in which
they were destined to attain to the highest rank. Sir Hugh
Smithson, who had been made an earl in 1 749, had to wait
only seventeen years from his first peerage before becoming
Duke of Northumberland. The Grenvilles, who treated
marriage as a science, and who, to use a French expression,
were les plus grands dpouseurs du siecle, only in this year,
1752, reached the House of Lords by the death of a
peeress in her own right, who had borne an heir to one of
them. As to the Dundases, the Lascelleses and the Greys,
the senior lord present at Queen Victoria's Coronation was
already between forty and fifty years old when those
respectable families received their first patent of nobility.
The evolution of these honourable country gentlemen
into a caste of great nobles, within the space of one or two
human lives, is a most interesting phenomenon in the social
history of nations. It forms one more proof of how the
highest honours and dignities in the realm of England were
open to persons of comparatively modest condition in an
age of reputed exclusiveness. They were nearly all land-
owners, a few of them being of sufficiently long lineage to
have qualified them for baronetcies before the Civil War,
like the Grosvenors, who bore a Norman name, or of wide
territorial influence, like the Greys of Northumberland.
But for the most part the families, which became politically
great in the eighteenth century, were unknown in English
history two hundred years before the Coronation of Queen
Victoria. It is worth noting that they displayed none
of the features of an upstart nobility, although the rural
gentry, from whom they chiefly sprang, were, at that period,
192 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
often uncultivated and uncouth. When they came up from
their estates they had no polished court, like that of
Versailles, in which to learn fine manners. The only
school for social education in the eighteenth century was to
be found in the great political houses ; for unlike what was
happening in France, where society had nothing to do with
the government of the country, the two terms were almost
identical in England. Marriage was a mighty instrument
in the career of the founders or improvers of the ruling
families, and the entry by its means into a powerful cousin-
hood was the first step to fame and fortune of many a line
of modest squires.
While the men, by their eloquence, were giving to the
British parliament its imperishable renown, the women, by
their intelligence and charm, were making English political
society the most brilliant in Europe, when the Revolution had
swept away the ancient court of France. Such a one was
Georgiana Duchess of Devonshire, whose beauty inspired
the adoration of all who came beneath its spell, except her
husband, from the greatest orator of his age to the rude
electors of Westminster. Such was her grandchild, Harriet
Duchess of Sutherland, who in close attendance on the
young Queen at the Coronation, incarnated the grace and
stateliness of the society about to pass away. This daughter
of the Howards, by her qualities, brought to her husband a
dowry even more desirable than did the heiresses who had
handed the Leveson-Gowers to the summit of the peerage.
In noble outline Sir Thomas Lawrence has preserved her
gracious features as they appeared radiant in early mother-
hood. In classic phrase Mr Gladstone has graven on the
marble of her monument at Trentham a reverential tribute
to the memory of one who took with her to the tomb a
THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION AND THE MONARCHY 193
tradition of which he remained the last witness and of
which he, in a certain sense, was the last inheritor.
It has been worth while to recall the personages by whom
the Queen was surrounded when she assumed the crown to
which she was to add fresh lustre after they had departed.
By considering them and their antecedents, their social
surroundings and their political influence, we can best realise
the revolution which took place during the reign of Queen
Victoria. It was inevitable that the governmental class
should lose its exclusive prerogatives in the new age which
we now see was inaugurated by her Coronation. But the
persons composing it were worthy of having a regal cere-
mony in a royal Abbey for their last full-dress parade.
Under their dispensation and that of their forerunners had
been founded the British Empire, which the Queen, whom
they had come to enthrone, was destined to aggrandise and,
by her personal influence, to consolidate. Sometimes an
error of policy had almost wrecked the Empire in its infancy,
as when sovereign and statesmen combined to drive the
American colonies from English rule, in spite of the patriotic
foresight of Chatham. But on the whole much more was
done to build up the Empire in the old days of slow and
difficult communication, when politicians had some excuse
not to understand the capabilities of the British race, than
by the first generation of those who saw the change of things,
yet did not recognise what its imperial significance might be.
Nor was the governing class merely a society of selfish
monopolists. In the annals of the reign of George III. it
is remarkable how many projects are to be found of reforms
proposed by members of the high political hierarchy, some
of which the twentieth century waits for in vain. Such a
reformer was the third Duke of Richmond, whose niece, the
M
194 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
giver of the ball at Brussels on the night before Quatre
Bras, sat in the front row of the peeresses at the Coronation
of Queen Victoria. That statesman, who was the great-
grandson of Charles II. and who bore the sceptre with the
dove at the Coronation of George III., was the mover of the
address to the throne, in 1778, against the further prosecu-
tion of hostilities with America which provoked the most
memorable scene ever witnessed in the House of Lords,
when Chatham, endeavouring to reply, sank back a dying
man. The Duke of Richmond was, therefore, not an
irresponsible dilettante. Yet he, in the eighteenth century,
proposed manhood suffrage and annual parliaments, institu-
tions which not only we do not possess in the reign of King
Edward, but which the democracy, grown utilitarian in its
demands, does not agitate for in its powerful organisations.
Whether the statesmen of the old parliamentary era were
reformers in advance of their time or believers in the
British Constitution of their day as the most perfect of
human institutions, they were a fine race. Leaders of the
people by their counsels, wise and eloquent in their instruc-
tions, rich men furnished with ability, the last generation of
them delivered to their young Queen a splendid inheritance.
Not only did she augment it while it rested in her custody,
but she also preserved the continuity of their tradition.
We have seen how the material changes which were hasten-
ing to fruition when the Queen was crowned, transformed
all the conditions of social life during her reign. But when
we come to the Coronation of her illustrious son we shall
find King Edward surrounded at Westminster Abbey by
the same estates of the realm which had paid allegiance to
her and to his remoter ancestors. Though the way of life
and mode of thought of the individual members of those
THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION AND THE MONARCHY 195
orders had undergone a complete change in the sixty years
since the last Coronation, the rite which they witnessed was
unaltered, and the institutions of which the King formally
assumed the headship were the same which his mother had
found established in the realm, only modified here and
there by gradual reform. The reason why they had sur-
vived in an era of revolutionary change was that they had
been held together by the monarchy. It was the young
Queen, lifted into the throne by the aged hands of survivors
of the eighteenth century, who, remaining in it till the
twentieth century arrived, guarded intact the ancient
institutions of the land, through sixty years of the most
stupendous changes ever seen in the history of the world.
" The Queen was so solitary " was an observation
made by an eye-witness of her accession, which we have
already quoted. But her solitude was in a sense even
greater at the end of her life ; for she had seen generation
after generation depart of her kindred, her counsellors and
her subjects. Of all the vast assembly on which she gazed
in Westminster Abbey the day when she was crowned,
none were alive at the end of her life except a little band
of aged men and women, who, as young men and maidens,
had enjoyed the precocious privilege of seeing a Corona-
tion.1 Young as she was herself on that great day, she
had begun to reign in earnest a year and a week before.
Her personal influence, which, to the benefit of the Empire,
often amounted to personal rule, without, however, ever
infringing constitutional usage, was due to her unequalled
experience in the affairs of the State. To them she had
1 One or two spectators of the Coronation who had arrived at man's estate in 1838 survived
Queen Victoria. Mr John Temple Leader, who was nearly ten years older than the Queen,
was elected member for Middlesex in 1837, and actually lived till the year after the Coronation
of King Edward.
196 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
applied herself from sunrise on that June morning when
Dr Howley and Lord Conyngham roused her from her bed
to tell her she was Queen. Each detail of that day was
noted by her, in accordance with what we now know, from
such portions of her diaries as she made public, to have
been her unvarying custom. It is even reported that,
nearly sixty-four years later, when the aged sovereign
lay dying, reference was made to a copy of that girlish
narrative of the incidents of her accession day, to aid in
regulating the solemn acts attending the transmission of
the sovereign power to her illustrious successor.
During the reign, which Queen Victoria had so begun,
her fame had become such, even beyond the wide bounds
of her Empire, that it is not a lyrical phrase of loyalty to
say that no death, in the history of the world, ever created
such immediate commotion as did hers. For of her it could
be said with greater truth than of the monarch of whom it
was written : " Thy soul covered the whole earth, thy name
went far unto the islands."
BOOK IV
THE CORONATION OF KING EDWARD VII.
CHAPTER I
THE KING, THE PEOPLE AND THE CONSTITUTION
IT has been a comparatively easy task to estimate the
position in history of each of the three great cere-
monies which we have been contemplating. Nearly
a century has passed since Napoleon, fifteen years after the
taking of the Bastille, solemnised the apotheosis of the
French Revolution by crowning himself emperor. After
that lapse of time we can take the measure of all the results
of the great movement which culminated in the imposing
pageant at Notre Dame de Paris. The circumstances of
the Coronation of Queen Victoria, a generation later, have
likewise passed into the domain of history. We see now
that it marked the beginning of a new era, which is more
distinct from its immediate past than any previous period
of profound change in the known annals of the human race.
The revolution in the material and social conditions of man-
kind, then initiated, is still proceeding, and none of us can
foresee whither it will lead. But we know that the modern
world, which had progressed with gradual evolution from
the period succeeding the invention of gunpowder and of
printing, came to an end in the second quarter of the nine-
teenth century, and that the assumption of the crown by
Queen Victoria coincided with that crisis in the history of
civilisation. Only a single generation divides us from the
proclamation of the German Empire, so we are less com-
petent to judge of the effects on mankind of the unity of
200 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Germany, signalised by that event. Sufficient time has,
however, elapsed for us to appreciate some of the results of
the conversion of a race, eminent in the realm of thought,
into a nation united on a military and commercial basis.
Its relative importance in the history of the world can
already be conjectured.
When we turn to the Coronation of King Edward an
objection may be made, with some show of reason, that it is
beyond human power to estimate the true significance of a
celebration, however impressive, before its echoes have
died away. The splendour of the scene, dazzling to the
senses, the national pride evoked by its imposing cir-
cumstances, were well calculated to affect the calmest
judgment, and to make each patriotic spectator of the
stately rite feel that he or she was taking part in an
august event of which the historical importance was
beyond doubt.
Warnings abound in history of the vanity of contem-
porary appreciations. Thus by the bivouac fire after
Valmy, Goethe, who had been Minister of War of
one of the vanquished allies, declared that the defeat
of Prussia, by the revolutionary levies of France, had
made that battle the beginning of a new era of
liberty — the fact being that it was the first step
towards the establishment of the most absolute military-
dictatorship ever seen in western Europe, which left the
indelible stamp of autocracy on all the tangible results of
the French Revolution. A poet has some excuse for talk-
ing like a seer. But the historian or political philosopher
has no license to trespass on the domain of anticipation, as
Tocqueville must have found out if he had been permitted
to look down upon the development of democracy in
THE KING, THE PEOPLE AND THE CONSTITUTION 201
America, which once occupied his prophetic soul.1 We
will, therefore, refrain from treating the Coronation of King
Edward as a celebration which marked the commencement
of a new era, though circumstances seem clearly to indicate
that it had that character. It may, however, be said, without
rashness, that if in the future the assumption of the crown
by Edward VII. is not looked upon as a signal landmark
in the annals of the British Empire and of the world, it will
have been the fault of the British people.
The ceremony which took place at Westminster, the
heart of the Empire, on August 9, 1902, was of twofold
importance. It was the consecration of the imperial idea,
conceived in the last generation of the nineteenth century
and quickened by the inspiration of the Crown which was
assumed by the King, on that great day, with its lustre thus
enhanced to a degree unknown in past ages. It was the
maintenance of an immemorial tradition celebrated under
unprecedented circumstances. The usage by an ardent yet
practical people of an archaic rite to signalise the modern
splendours of their empire, the recognition, by a free
democracy, of a hereditary crown, as a symbol of the
world-wide domination of their race, constitute no mere
pageant, but an event of the highest historical interest,
whatever the future has in store.
In the earlier pages of this work certain passages and
incidents in the history of Europe and of civilisation have
1 The opening sentences of his Dtmocratie en Amtrique have a somewhat ironical interest
in these days of monopolies and trusts and railway-kings : " Parmi les objets nouveaux qui
pendant mon sejour aux 6tats Unis ont attir6 mon attention, aucun n'a plus vivement frappd
mes regards que I'egalit6 des conditions. . . . Bientot je reconnus que ce meme fait etend
son influence fort au dela des moeurs politiques et des Lois " (Introduction, ed. 1836).
Again, later in the work, he remarks, " Si Ton me demandait oil je place 1'aristocratie ame'ri-
caine, je repondrais sans he'siter que ce n'est point parmi les riches, qui n'ont aucun lieu
commun qui les rassemble " (Vol. ii. c. 8).
202 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
been dwelt upon, which to the superficial glance may seem
to be not directly connected with the Coronation of King
Edward. Their relation to that event will now become
apparent. We have gone back to the French Revolution,
when, in the view not only of poets like Goethe, but of calm
observers and thinkers, the monarchical idea was under-
mined and doomed to perish. We have followed the
unlooked-for turn which that great movement took, and
noted the special reasons why England was not involved in it.
We have seen how the revolutionary legend revived when
the nations of the continent no longer associated it with the
horrors of war, and how they were caught in its final recrudes-
cence, England alone escaping by reason of the loyalty
which the young Queen had inspired in the hearts of the
people whom she had ruled for ten brief years. We have
scanned the annals of the other reigning houses of Europe.
We have found that only in one of them besides our own has
the sovereign power remained unchanged or has devolved
without interruption, during the nineteenth century, and in
that one which has not shared the vicissitudes of the other
continental dynasties, the imperial family of Russia, two, and
probably three, of its monarchs died in that period by the
assassin's hand.
The insurrections and civil wars which have chequered
the history of Europe, in the intervals of invasions which
altered its map, the tragedies which have stained some of
its thrones, have served to remind us of the superior happi-
ness of England where, during two-thirds of the nineteenth
century, the most marked domestic tendency, in an epoch of
social and political change, was the gradual strengthening
of the bonds of affection between the sovereign and the
people. We have pointed out that the increased stability
THE KING, THE PEOPLE AND THE CONSTITUTION 203
of the throne, in the classic land of liberty, has been a
powerful example and influence in preserving monarchical
institutions in other European states. But the comparison
of our constitutional experiences with those of continental
nations has not diverted our attention from the revolution
which has taken place in our own country, and which
issuing thence has altered the conditions of existence
throughout the globe. We have recalled the antique
character of many of the material circumstances of life
at the date when Queen Victoria was crowned ; we have
described in some detail the elements composing the
political forces of England at that moment, which was
coincident with a turning-point in the history of mankind.
We have shown that the material revolution, which was
then beginning, has affected every class of the population
in its social and political relations more profoundly than
any legislative acts. We have seen that, in consequence
of the changes so produced, the needs, the aspirations
and many of the ideas of all civilised nations underwent
a greater transformation during the threescore years of
the reign of Queen Victoria than during at least three
previous centuries.
Yet, when we come to the Coronation of King Edward,
after sixty years of astounding progress in the evolution of
the human race, we see the monarch invested with the
ancient emblems of sovereignty which his ancestors bore ;
we see the investiture performed with the same venerable
rites ; we see the King surrounded with the same Estates of
the realm which stood around the throne in the Middle
Ages. All this, moreover, was no mere spectacle retained
by a people proud of its antiquity. Indeed, that criticism
might have been applied to it with some justice in the
204 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
early Georgian era, when the monarchy, re-established on
a new statutory basis, needed to be decked out in all its
ancient trappings in order to display its hereditary nature
to a nation not united on dynastic questions. But though
such precautionary policy was, perhaps, not absent from the
ordering of the regal ceremonial in those unprogressive
days of privilege, it had no place in the Coronation of
Edward VII. All the hereditary and traditional reasons
for the rite remained as heretofore. But to them was now
added a popular sanction of the ceremony which had
scarcely existed even when Queen Victoria was crowned,
amid acclamations called forth by her youthful promise,
which seemed to have saved the nation from a great peril.
The people of that time had little political power ; it was
illiterate ; it had no newspapers, and could not have read
them had a cheap press existed ; it rarely stirred from the
locality of its origin ; it took no part in the creation of
public opinion ; the organisation of its labour was sur-
rounded by prohibitory restrictions. All the disabilities
of the people, here indicated, had disappeared when
Edward VII. was placed in the throne, and the King
assumed his Crown as the head of an enfranchised and
intelligent democracy, the most utilitarian in its aims in
all Europe.
The attachment of a utilitarian democracy to the Crown
is a notable and consoling feature of our national life at the
beginning of the twentieth century. It shows how salutary
a force is the existence of the monarchy in our midst. For,
in the most practical age in the history of mankind, it is
able to animate the most practical race on the face of the
earth with an idealistic sentiment ; and any such influence
grows more and more precious in a world saturated with
THE KING, THE PEOPLE AND THE CONSTITUTION 205
materialism. The joy and gratitude which the populace of
England feels each time that the King shows himself to his
subjects, clothed in his attributes of sovereignty, is not the
mere sensuous satisfaction of inhabitants of a grey climate
whose sombre daily round is lit up by the sight of a glitter-
ing pageant. When the King's annual progress to open
parliament brightens the roadways of London, it is not the
brave spectacle alone which tempts the humble citizens
to crowd the route. It is a finer feeling, subtle and
fragile in its essence, which, born of the imagination, is
called loyalty, and which, if rightly directed, is capable of
inspiring noble and self-denying acts of patriotism and of
heroism.
A French writer who was at some pains to analyse the
genesis of English loyalty, and to trace it to an idealistic
source, described the Coronation of King Edward as "a
splendid anachronism." The great nation to which the
author of the phrase belongs has suffered so much in the
past from the conception and pursuit of ideals, that a
Frenchman may well be excused if a touch of scorn is
apparent in his appreciation of an idealistic celebration in a
foreign country. The fair land of France indeed would be
happier if it could be the scene of a similar anachronism.
For, in great measure owing to its complete severance from
the traditions of the past, French public life, in spite of the
supremely artistic temperament of the people, has become
so vulgarised that it is too often abandoned to the inferior
elements of the community.
In one sense all idealistic effusions are anachronisms.
If the Coronation of a king with antique rite, handed down
for nine hundred years with continuous tradition, can be so
described, we may put into the same category the practice
206 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
of all other offices based on revealed religion, which in their
origin are twice nine hundred years old. If the imposing
ritual of Westminster Abbey, solemnised in the presence of
the notables of the land attired in their robes of state, is
incompatible with the railways which brought the crowds
to London to witness the procession, or the telegraphs
which flashed the news of the Coronation to the ends of the
Empire, the simple worship of a company of devout Cornish
or Scottish peasants, praying in quaint language to an
unseen power and reading Hebrew poetry in a Jacobean
translation, is in the same case. It becomes clearer every
day that in the preservation of anachronisms lies the
salvation of the human race from a brutal materialism.
The work of the painter, the sculptor, the poet, is each an
anachronism, in the modern state, planned and carried out
on artificial lines, which were invented as a standard of
beauty and perfection when mankind was young, and
having no relation with the products of a mechanical
age.
But the Coronation of the King of England was far from
being a mere lesson in idealism, having the same sort of
value as a stately work of art, such as the pictures painted
by Rubens of the sumptuous court of Henri IV., or by
Velasquez of the family of Philip IV., or by Vandyke of our
own Charles I. If that were the case the French writer
would be justified in terming it an anachronism, and could
illustrate his taunt by the example of the last coronation
which took place in his country. When Charles X. decided
to be crowned at Reims, with all the pomp amid which the
kings of his line had assumed the governance of France
and Navarre, the ceremony was an empty masquerade.
It was performed with the dignified forms of old ; but
THE KING, THE PEOPLE AND THE CONSTITUTION 207
although only a generation had elapsed between the de-
position of the ancient monarchy and this revival of its
ceremonial, a new nation had arisen. The past had been
cast adrift, and the flood of the Revolution rolled between it
and modern France. So no one was impressed by the
show, or surprised at its sequel five years later when the
monarch was sent to die in exile, while one of the chief
assistants at his anointing usurped the throne. The corona-
tion of Charles X. thus had no more historical importance
than had the Plantagenet Ball, given a few years later by
Queen Victoria, at which she and her Consort appeared as
Philippa of Hainault and Edward III. It was an anti-
quarian reproduction having no relation with the continuity
of national history.
The Coronation of Edward VII. was even more than a
link in the continuity of English history. Precious as is
the tradition of nine hundred years, its inheritance would
not suffice to make a monarch beloved : for there was once
a British monarch with a tradition of nearly as many
years behind him whose coronation called forth no ex-
pressions of popular fervour. It would not be fitting to refer
to the personal qualities of the sovereign which have inspired
in the nation a sentiment in his favour warmer than that of
idealistic loyalty. It may, however, be permitted to cite
the testimony of a foreign observer of the happy relations
which exist between the King of England and his people,
and of their striking result. A republican student of the
contemporary history and institutions of our country, at the
end of a remarkable essay published on that subject, in
the year of the Coronation of King Edward, summed up his
conclusions by saying that " if ever a conflict arose between
parliament and the royal power in England, the immense
208 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
majority of the working-classes and peasantry would range
themselves on the side of the crown." l
Such a proposition in the mouth of an Englishman might
seem to be the voice of exaggerated loyalty. But when
uttered by a stranger, not predisposed in favour of mon-
archical institutions, as the result of a minute and impartial
inquest, it becomes evidence of great value as to the
relations of the British nation with its sovereign at the
beginning of the twentieth century. It indicates that
the Coronation of King Edward took place under circum-
stances quite unparalleled. Popular as was the gracious
young Queen in 1838, it was generally felt at that epoch
that the statesmen of both parties, and the parliament
which produced them, constituted the bulwark of the
throne. It was deemed a happy accident that the new
sovereign possessed engaging qualities which rendered
easy the functions of the defenders of the crown. But
all the same, it was agreed that the Estates of the realm
were its pillars of support. Now the situation is reversed.
Such was the silent influence exercised by Queen Victoria
on the imagination of her subjects, notably during the last
twenty-five years of her reign, that the throne became the
most cherished institution in the land. Had the succession
devolved on an unsympathetic heir, there might have
occurred some revulsion of feeling in the nation. But the
grief called forth by the passing away of the great figure of
Queen Victoria was consoled by the accession of one who
had stood on the steps of the throne, for many a year, in the
full sight of the nation. In that trying position King
i La Reine Victoria : so- vie, son r6le, son rtgne, par Abel Chevalley. Paris, 1902.
This able writer is not the one quoted previously, who is an anonymous contributor to the
Tftnpi.
THE KING, THE PEOPLE AND THE CONSTITUTION 209
Edward had so gained the confidence of his people, that,
had it been the usage to ratify the succession by a plebiscite,
he would have been called to reign by the unanimous voice
of the Empire.
The King having inherited the personal as well as the
constitutional attributes of his venerated predecessor, his
place in the realm was a higher one when he assumed the
crown of England than that occupied by Queen Victoria
when she sat in the same historic chair in Westminster
Abbey sixty-four years before. The three Estates were
assembled in the transepts and the choir, then, as at the
previous Coronation, displaying to the world the continuity
of England's traditions. But instead of their being the
supports of the monarchy, the indiscernible architecture
of the constitutional edifice had undergone a change. The
monarchy had become the keystone of the structure, keep-
ing all the other portions in place. Every part of the
fabric of the British Constitution, piled up gradually in
the course of centuries, is essential to the whole. None
but those who have lived in foreign lands and studied the
imperfection of their modern systems of government can
fully grasp the truth of this, or can understand how rash
are the projects of reformers who, for various plausible
reasons, would destroy portions of our venerable national
edifice. The time may come when the outlying regions of
the Empire may call for some modification of the British
Constitution, so that they may have a place within it. But
such schemes have not yet come forth from the domain of
dreamland ; and, meanwhile, nothing impressed the loyal
colonists who came to England for the Coronation more
profoundly than the spectacle of the old Estates of the
realm, much older in their origin than the art of printing,
210 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
performing their functions in the modern state, under the
still more ancient Crown.
In the ages during which the sovereign, acting with the
three Estates, has constituted the government of England,
the relative powers have varied of the elements composing
that quadruple, or in practice triple, authority. At the
present day there is no question of reviving the contro-
versies of the seventeenth century, on the settlement of
which the Hanoverian succession is based, nor even those
echoes of them which were heard in the eighteenth century.
The new attributes of the Crown, which King Edward was
the first to inherit, involve no points of constitutional law
or usage. Yet it is not impossible that insensibly, by their
agency, a change may be wrought in our unwritten Con-
stitution. That, however, concerns the future, with which
we have nothing to do in these pages. What has already
happened is that the enhanced popularity of the Crown
has increased the stability of the other elements of the
Constitution.
The maintenance of the ancient Estates of the realm
would seem to be a constitutional rather than a political
question. Yet, inasmuch as the removal of the bishops
from the Upper Chamber, or the abolition of the entire
House of Lords is projected on some political programmes,
it would not be proper to discuss the subject here, even in
its constitutional aspect. We may, however, without tres-
passing on controversial ground, look back to see if the
position of that subject before the nation has undergone
any change since Queen Victoria was crowned. In the
third quarter of the last century the abolition of the House
of Lords was perpetually called for by politicians of the
widest popular influence, such as Mr Bright, as a practical
THE KING, THE PEOPLE AND THE CONSTITUTION 211
reform, the execution of which seemed to wait only for the
next extension of the suffrage. Again, the withdrawal of
the bishops from the House of Lords was confidently
hoped for by Whigs who feared Mr Bright's radicalism,
and who held many views which would have ranked them
as antiquated Tories in our time. Yet, half a century after
Thackeray, the mirror of cultivated society, denounced the
inclusion of the bishops in parliament, or after John
Bright, the leader of the middle-classes, arraigned with
his eloquence the temporal as well as the spiritual peer-
age, both these institutions remain intact. The preserva-
tion of the House of Lords is not due to the increased
prestige of the temporal peerage, which is less abundant
in eminent political names than at the period when it was
most formidably attacked. Nor does the augmented zeal
of the Church account for the new tolerance accorded to the
Lords Spiritual. Indeed, among the most ardent critics
of their position as peers of parliament are now the
earnest Anglican opponents of Erastianism, within the
Church.
The reason for the relaxation of the assaults upon the
two Estates represented in the House of Lords seems to
be twofold. In the first place the democracy has become
utilitarian in its aims. Its interest lies no longer in abstract
political questions. The relations of capital and labour,
the organisation of trades, the regulation of wages, the
housing of the poor, state and municipal socialism — such
are the questions which appeal to the British working
classes in the twentieth century. But the existence of the
House of Lords is no longer a source of theoretical irrita-
tion to the working man. He has no enthusiasm for
it ; but so long as it seems not to interfere directly with
212 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
the welfare of his class, he regards it without active
hostility. In the second place had the feeling inspired
by the monarchy in the first thirty years of the nineteenth
century continued in the new commercial era, it is not
easy to believe that the House of Lords would have
been allowed to stand. It would have been looked
upon as a pillar of another unpopular institution, and
in that capacity it would have been assailed. But with
the monarchy popular, the situation is reversed. It is
agreeable to the sovereign to know that he can rely on
the loyalty of the House of Lords, but it is not of high
importance. Cardinal Manning once said, in intimate con-
versation, that, for the purpose of what Roman Catholics
call "the conversion of England," he would sooner have
the simultaneous conversion of a hundred genuine working
men than that of the whole House of Lords. The venerable
cardinal did not mean that his love for the toilers of the
land was such that, for the benefit of a hundred of them, he
would gladly see six hundred noblemen doomed to perdi-
tion. Nor was he pursuing the once favourite thesis of the
superiority of the opinion of the uneducated over that of the
relatively well-instructed. What the observant old English-
man meant was that in the modern state, no institution
could claim to be national in character, in influence and in
stability, which did not enjoy both the trust and the support
of the democracy. The conversion of England has taken
place, with regard to the monarchy. The nation, some-
times hostile, often indifferent, has returned to its old
religion, to its cult for the Crown, with a unanimity never
known since the days of Elizabeth. The monarchy has
become the most popular institution in the land, and its
popularity is a protection for the other elements of the
THE KING, THE PEOPLE AND THE CONSTITUTION 213
Constitution. The democracy knows that the Crown is not
the cause of any of its hardships, and that under it, on the
contrary, greater progress has been made by the working-
classes in obtaining power by the organisation of labour
than in certain communities where the government is not
monarchical, notably in the Republic of France.
Thus the popularity of the Crown safeguards the entire
constitutional edifice. This does not mean that the
influence of the sovereign has ever been used to pro-
tect this or that institution. Indeed, one reason for the
popularity of the Crown in our day, is the impeccability
of its constitutional attitude towards the wishes of the
nation. But the feeling which the monarchy now inspires
reacts upon the policy of the people, and since its beneficial
influence has been apparent to the democracy, they have
grown lukewarm in attacking any of the institutions of
the land, except to gain some practical end. No working
man would formulate in such terms the reason for the
changed attitude of his class, because he is not given to
that method of mental process. But though the democracy
be unconscious of the cause of its recoil from iconoclasm,
there can be little doubt that it is to the altered position
of the monarchy in the national imagination that we owe
the preservation of the Constitution, which is a benefit
to be fully estimated only by those who have closely
studied the working of foreign systems of government.
The relative positions of the sovereign and the House of
Lords have also changed in another respect. The railways
and the other conditions of modern life have, as we have
seen, exercised a levelling influence, and have destroyed
many of the social marks which formerly distinguished class
from class. The loss of political influence, which occurred
2i4 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
when the parliamentary representation of the close boroughs
was suppressed, affected only a limited section of the peerage.
In the days before railways, a nobleman of high rank and of
large estate was a great and conspicuous figure in the land,
whether electoral patronage was or was not an incident of
his territorial possession. In the county of his residence he
was a personage of power and importance. His journeys
to and from the capital, before and after the session of
parliament, were the occasion for an imposing display, which
fluttered the country-side and enlivened the London road,
not less than a royal progress. Indeed, though the feudal
system had been long since abolished, the great subjects of
the realm were like feudal lords in the signs of dignity and
magnificence with which they rivalled the outward state of
the sovereign. It is needless to indicate how immediate
was the levelling effect of the railways in this respect. Ten
years after the Coronation of Queen Victoria the nobles,
who stood around her throne at Westminster Abbey, had
perforce abandoned all distinctive circumstances in their
mode of travel, which henceforth on the railroad were
reserved for the sovereign and the heir to the throne — as
the railway-king has not set up his insignia of royalty in
our country. The egalitarian influence of steam traction,
on all classes beneath that of royalty, is only typical of
other changes in the same direction which have taken place
in the commercial era. As we have already observed,
wealth, under the new conditions of existence, has become
the great leveller of the wealthy. The bearer of a historical
title which gives him precedence over all the other subjects
of the land, except four or five holders of official posts in
Church and State, finds that in all the circumstances of his
life, outside that formal precedence, he has little superiority,
THE KING, THE PEOPLE AND THE CONSTITUTION 215
in town or in country, over any possessor of newly acquired
wealth, who is willing to pay a price for social consideration,
as it is understood in our day. One reason for this is the
disposition which inheritors of great names and estates often
evince to abdicate the situation in the land which is their
acknowledged birthright. Such an abdication of social and
moral power is the less to be excused, because many of the
greatest titles in the peerage are endowed with hereditary
wealth in proportions which upstart fortunes can rarely
rival. A grave symptom in the organism of English
modern society is the tendency, apparent in a section of
the hereditary class, to descend from its high vantage
ground — whereon it ought to be looked up to as an example
in manners — and to model its life according to the debased
standard of the new plutocracy, which has no tradition to
regulate it, and no other aim, in its social relations, than
the pursuit of purchasable pleasure. The existence of
the monarchy, with its ancient tradition and stately for-
malities, ought to be an influence to restrain the ranks
of society which stand nearest the throne from falling
into a disorderly materialism.
Thus we see that while various causes have contributed
to make the relative position of the peerage in the nation
less considerable than it was, that of the sovereign has risen
in importance. His is the one dignity in the land which has
not been prejudicially affected by the new order of things.
While it is certain that the monarchy, as an institution,
stands higher in the popular estimation than at the time
when Queen Victoria was crowned, it is doubtful if the
House of Commons stands as high, in spite of the more
democratic basis on which it is established. The reason
for this seems to be that the House of Commons has ceased
216 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
to represent any particular principle in the Constitution.
For the two centuries preceding the first Reform Bill it
was looked upon as the Estate of the realm which was
always ready to defend the nation, whenever the necessity
arose, against encroachments of the royal prerogative. In
the generation after the Reform Bill — though not in direct
consequence of that measure, but rather, as we have seen,
on account of the material revolution which was then taking
place — it represented the increasing predominance of the
commercial middle-class over the territorial aristocracy. In
the future it will, perhaps, represent the democratic forces of
the land ; but that state of things has not yet arrived. The
first parliament of King Edward VII. contained probably
the wealthiest House of Commons which ever sat at West-
minster. Although the working-classes, by means of their
well-organised trade associations, have obtained a certain
footing within the House, and have put into prominence the
discussion of labour questions at many contested elections,
the democracy have only a handful of delegates of their
own order to represent them in parliament. The published
statistics, which purport to analyse the callings of members
of the House of Commons, by their minute classifications
divert the attention from the real composition of that body.
If the House of Commons which attended the Coronation
of Queen Victoria could be described as a body of land-
owners, tempered by a small commercial element, the
members for Great Britain who were present in the Abbey
when King Edward was crowned may roughly be said to be
a body of capitalists 1 supplemented by a numerous band of
1 In the published analyses of members of the House of Commons a large number of
employers of labour or other capitalists whose chief interests are in industrial and commercial
enterprises, are entered as landowners, by reason of the estates which they have purchased.
THE KING, THE PEOPLE AND THE CONSTITUTION 217
lawyers. The latter class abounds in all legislative chambers
elected on a wide suffrage. Since the French Revolution,
in lands which have adopted the representative system,
democratic electorates have been the easy prey of profes-
sional politicians. But it is only in Great Britain that
capitalists are chosen in large numbers under popular
franchise. In France the representatives of the commerce
and industry of the nation are, to the disadvantage of the
community, excluded from the legislature by manhood
suffrage, which eschews equally the genuine representa-
tives of the working-classes, and fills the legislature with a
horde of needy lawyers, doctors, professors and journalists,
who find in politics a means of livelihood.
It is infinitely better that the House of Commons should
contain an excessive proportion of the capitalist class than
that it should be filled by professional politicians. It is not,
however, to be expected that an assembly largely composed,
on both sides of the Speaker's chair, of persons whose chief
characteristic is their prosperity, should inspire enthusiasm
in the country. The life of the House of Commons con-
tinues to be intensely interesting, owing to the personality of
a few of its leaders and of some of its independent members.
It remains the centre of English life, and happy is the
country in which no class of the community stands aloof
from politics. But better off as we are, in this respect, than
are certain nations in both hemispheres, the House of
Commons does not represent any cause which attracts to it,
But their income is in no sense dependent on the land, nor have they any territorial influence.
With the exception of certain conspicuous members of the Front Benches the capitalist class
does not take a prominent part in the proceedings of parliament. The most active, interest-
ing and intelligent in debate, outside the ranks of the Privy Councillors, are the representa-
tives of two extreme sections of social life — the remnant of members of territorial families
and the delegates of the working-classes.
218 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
as in former days, the pride and devotion of the people.
No longer are metaphors applied to it to the effect that
it is the bulwark of popular liberties. Consequently its
members, who attended the Coronation of King Edward,
stood in a very different relation towards the monarchy
as compared with that of the Commons who, in the
days of limited franchise, represented a force rival to the
royal power. The constitutional relations of the king with
his parliament remain the same. But the sovereign is no
longer dependent on the good-will either of the House of
Lords or of the House of Commons. Nothing is less
likely than that a conflict should ever arise between the
Crown and the Estates of the realm. But as the foreign
writer, quoted above, observed, if such a conflict should
arise, the nation would range itself on the side of the Crown.
One of the chief reasons for this changed state of
things is that, while parliament no longer represents any
cause dear to the people, the Crown has become the symbol
of the destiny of the British race, in its hegemony of the
world. Moreover, the House of Commons is not the only
representative assembly returned to legislate by the subjects
of King Edward. To his Coronation there came the Prime
Ministers of the Canadian Dominion, of the Australian
Commonwealth, of New Zealand, of Natal, as well as
delegates from important provincial legislatures within
those colonies which are federated. Those legislative
bodies no doubt look up with respect to the mother of
parliaments ; but it is equally certain that their existence
has diminished the relative importance of the House of
Commons in the Empire, while they have augmented the
prestige of the Crown, which is the common object of
reverence of a score of parliaments, federal and local.
CHAPTER II
THE GATHERING OF AN EMPIRE
IN bygone days it was not the practice of English
monarchs to defer their coronation until a year or
more had elapsed after their succession. In the Middle
Ages the anointing and crowning of a king was a sacra-
mental rite without which his kingship was incomplete.
Only by the act of ecclesiastical consecration was the
sovereign put into actual possession of the royal office.1
This idea was still so prevalent in the seventeenth century
that certain persons concerned in a conspiracy made against
James I. in the first days of his reign, pleaded "that their
practice against the king could not be treason, because done
against him before he was crowned."2 The King of Scots
consequently lost no time after the death of Elizabeth in hav-
ing the crown of England placed upon his head. On April
28th, 1603, the funeral of the great queen had taken place
in Westminster Abbey, and thither came King James on
July 25th, being the feast of the apostle whose name he bore,
to be crowned and anointed by John Whitgift, Archbishop
of Canterbury.
1 E. A. Freeman, History of the Norman Conquest of England, vol. ii. c. 7.
2 The Coronation Order of King James /., edited by J. Wickham Legg, 1902. Introduction
Ixi. The valuable researches of Dr J. Wickham Legg (chairman of the Henry Bradshaw
Society), and of his son Mr Leopold Wickham Legg, are too well known to students of
the history of the coronations of our English kings to call for commendation. I have no
intention of trespassing on their learned domain, and would refer those who are anxious for
information on this highly interesting subject to the Three Coronation Orders, which was
issued to the Henry Bradshaw Society by Dr Wickham Legg in 1900, and to the English
Coronation Records, published by Mr L. G. Wickham Legg in 1901.
219
220 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Charles II. was not permitted for some years to assume the
crown, laid aside by his father under circumstances which pro-
duced an interregnum. But with that exception the practice
of speedy coronations continued till far into the eighteenth
century, although meanwhile the monarchy had been re-con-
structed on a statutory basis, by the Act of Settlement, in
such a manner that the admission of the sovereign to the
performance of his high duties no longer awaited his formal
assumption of the crown. Thus George I. was crowned
ten weeks after the death of Queen Anne, and just four
months after his own death the coronation of his son
George II. took place. It was only George III. who
established the precedent of the postponement of the coro-
nation until the year following the demise of the crown.
Even without the example set by his four immediate
predecessors it is unlikely that King Edward would have
permitted the Coronation to take place during the year in
which his reign commenced. The grief of the people at
the disappearance of the venerable queen who had filled
the throne for more than two generations, was as pro-
found as was the filial sorrow of her illustrious successor.
Consequently the decision of the King to defer the
Coronation was in consonance with the feeling of
his subjects. Desiring their happy participation in the
pageants attending the solemn rites, he further postponed
the ceremony far beyond the first anniversary of Queen
Victoria's death, until the second summer of his reign, so
that his people might come together from every corner of
the British Empire at a season when the climate of the
metropolis is most likely to discard its habitual inclemency.
In the changeful annals of English summers, never were
skies so benign as in the last part of June 1902. As the
THE GATHERING OF AN EMPIRE 221
date appointed for the coronation of King Edward drew
near, the leaden pall which usually hangs between the roofs
of London and the heavens, even during the genial months
of the year, was suddenly withdrawn. The sun shone with
southern lustre in a cloudless blue upon streets which bore
no longer their customary aspect of serious and bustling
duskiness. They were decorated in a manner which per-
haps caused more joy to our guests from primitive lands
than jealousy to those who came from more artistic
countries. But it was not our well-meaning trophies in
bunting and bay leaves which attracted attention. It was
the moving scene on the pavements and the roadways.
The streets were thronged by crowds of people who did
not rush with that headlong haste which, in the eyes of
foreigners, characterises the perambulations of the citizens
of London. The British nation had taken to sauntering.
The holiday-makers strolling in the sunshine, good-
humoured and orderly, were not all Londoners, nor yet
English provincials, whose type is less distinct than at the
time of Queen Victoria's Coronation, when they came in
their hundreds to gape at the wonders of the capital. The
Yorkshireman or the Devonian of our day has little to
distinguish him in costume or ideas from the Cockney, and
sees nothing to surprise him in the streets of London.
But thousands of these midsummer sightseers came from
coasts more distant than those washed by the North Sea
and the British Channel. The crowd was cosmopolitan,
yet the men and women composing it were chiefly of
British speech ; but their English was often pronounced
with accents unfamiliar in the British Isles. It was not
the twang of the ubiquitous American which prevailed
among the people whose eagerness showed them to be
222 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
wayfarers. Certain intonations, less aggressive than those
practised in the United States, were heard which took
back the passing traveller in his reminiscences to the
Canadian shores of Lake Huron or the wooded promon-
tories of Sydney harbour. From Canada alone five
thousand loyal visitors l had come to London, while more
distant Australia and New Zealand had sent many a ship-
load of colonists to salute the Imperial Crown placed on
the head of a new monarch as the emblem of the Empire
of which they were proud to be citizens.
More striking than the accent of the colonial sons of
the Empire was their aspect. A certain proportion of the
inhabitants of the British Islands show signs of physical
degeneracy. Their increased zeal for athletic exercise,
which is too often vicarious, has not counterbalanced the
results of intemperance and of the insanitary conditions of
life among the poor. England, as we have already seen,
by reason of its minute proportions and of its climate, was
not intended by nature to be the home of a teeming popula-
tion, crowded in sombre cities. But we also noted that
the consolation which England enjoys for the penalties of
civilisation is the development of the British Empire by
means of the new elements of modern progress. One
feature of that compensation was manifest in the crowds
which had come to London for the Coronation of the King.
Many of our fellow-citizens from beyond the seas were
sturdy and well set on their limbs, resolute and clear of
countenance, like men who passed their days in free ex-
panses of space and air, wont from childhood to encounter
i This is the number given by the Toronto Globe in a letter dated July 4, 1902, from its
Special Correspondent, whose series of articles sent to that iournal from London during the
Coronation period constitute a document of great interest and value, from the pen of an able
Colonial writer.
THE GATHERING OF AN EMPIRE 223
difficulties which had to be overcome by diligence and
energy. No doubt, in the great cities of the colonies, such
as Melbourne and Toronto, there is a section of the popula-
tion which suffers from the ills, moral and material, which
are found in all agglomerations of the human race. But
the specimens of Canadians and Australians who came to
England for the great imperial festival, displayed in their
persons the physical capabilities of the Anglo-Saxon and
Celtic races transplanted to a vigorous and spacious soil.
The stalwart colonists treading the pavement of London
were not all men of British origin or speech. When the
contingent of Canadian troops, sent by the Dominion to the
Coronation, was crossing the ocean, among the songs with
which heroes of the Boer campaign enlivened the voyage
was an old seafaring strain which told of Saint Malo beau
port de mer. The melodious "habitants" of Quebec had
received it from their ancestors, Bretons and Normans, who
had fought for Louis the Well-beloved, King of France and
Navarre ; and they now sang the old French refrain on
their way to pay loyal homage to Edward VII., King of all
the Britains, wearing whose uniform many a comrade of
theirs had laid down his life on the veldt of South Africa.
That uniform in manifold forms was conspicuous amid
the crowds which thronged the capital as the date appointed
for the Coronation drew nigh. During the South African
War, British soldiers who had returned from it had made
the tawny military clothing known as khaki a familiar
object in the streets of London. But a different interest
attached to the similar garb of the Colonial troops which
had fought for the maintenance of the Empire. The chief
benefit to England of the Boer war was not the conquest
of South Africa. Nor was it the lesson which we learned,
224 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
at a great price, on the fateful subject of military organisa-
tion and efficiency. The great advantage which we gained
from that encounter, costly in blood and treasure, was the
proof it evoked of colonial patriotism to the Empire.
Economic and administrative questions which regulate the
political relations between the mother-country and its
mighty offshoots, though of prime interest to statesmen
and to journalists, only indirectly affect the multitude.
But a call to battle, answered spontaneously by peaceful
citizens, whose trade was not of arms, whose homes were
not in danger of invasion, and who were under no obliga-
tion to render aid to the mother-country, proved that the
attachment of the Colonists to the Empire was as strong
as the value which they put on their own lives.
In every community, old or new, there is an adventurous
element composed of daring men who are willing to take
employment as fighters wherever fighting is to be had,
without caring for the merits or the nature of the cause
at issue. If the troops sent to South Africa by Canada,
Australia and New Zealand contained a few such soldiers of
fortune, they formed only a small proportion of the gallant
force which endured the hardships of the veldt and left
beneath it many a gallant young life. The colonial soldiery
were recruited from every social class. They came from
the stock-farm, the ranche, the counting-house, the store, as
well as from homes as luxurious as those of the wealthy
in the old country. Consequently the devotion to the
Empire of these men from the west and the south affected
the colonists in every relation of their life, and put their
loyalty to a crucial test. The degree of independence
enjoyed by the Colonies in their relations with the metro-
polis, and such-like cognate questions, might be settled by
THE GATHERING OF AN EMPIRE 225
politicians without any change taking place in the material
happiness of the citizens concerned. But the response to
the mother-country's summons to arms did materially affect
the daily life of hundreds of Canadian and Australasian
homes. Aged parents gave up the sons who sustained
or brightened their declining years ; young husbands re-
nounced the joys of fatherhood, exposing their children
to the risk of being left orphans ; the farmer, the trader,
the clerk abandoned their means of livelihood for the
dangers of the battlefield and the deadlier perils of the
unwholesome camp ; and all these sacrifices were under-
taken by men, not one in fifty of whom had ever seen the
shores of England, in whose name the warfare was engaged.
The soldiers of the colonial forces who had come to
London for the Coronation were therefore looked upon with
peculiar interest, as the incarnation of the strongest senti-
ment of attachment which had ever been evoked between
the mother-country and the Colonies. The contingent sent
by Canada was by far the most numerous.1 In addition to
the men of French speech and race from Quebec, who
have already been mentioned, there were representatives
of all the composite population of the Dominion. There
were descendants of those " United Empire Loyalists " who
parted company with the revolted American colonists and
whose proud title showed that even in the eighteenth
century the imperial idea existed in the hearts of British
citizens beyond the seas. There were Gaelic settlers from
1 In round figures the Canadian contingent numbered 660 of all ranks. The remaining
colonial " European " forces sent to England for the Coronation numbered 840, of which 220
came from the Australian Commonwealth, 130 from New Zealand, 150 from the Cape, and
100 from Natal. To their deep regret the Canadian forces were compelled to return after the
postponement of the Coronation, but a smaller contingent came back to England for the
ceremony of the 9th of August.
P
226 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
the Gulf of Saint Lawrence ; there were men of Irish and
Lowland Scottish origin from Ontario ; there were the sons
of English parents who had learned to sit their chargers
in the prairies which skirt the foothills of the Rockies.
Every state of the more remote Australian Commonwealth
too, was represented in uniforms in the streets of the
capital. There were lancers from New South Wales, the
mother colony of the Southern Seas, which alone had given
the splendid tribute of five thousand men to fight in South
Africa. There were Bushmen from Victoria, there were
Rifles from Adelaide, Mounted Infantry from Swan River,
from torrid Brisbane and from temperate Hobart. New
Zealand, whose brave native race was not subdued without
a struggle, sent with its gallant colonists a body of loyal
Maori warriors. Cape Colony and Natal, ravaged by the
war, sent some of their home defenders to compare impres-
sions of their stricken land with the Australian and the
Canadian who had passed that way. From nearer seas
the ancient people of Malta had sent a gallant corps from
their isle of romantic history, which is now the guardian of
England's highway to the East.
The Maoris from New Zealand were not the only
soldiers of extra- European origin sent with the colonial
forces to the Coronation. From North Borneo came a
little band of Dyaks, sons of the head-hunters of the seas
where the Pacific meets the Indian Ocean. The Sultan of
Perak brought from the Straits, where it is always summer,
his bodyguard of Malays. Ceylon sent its white-clad
sinuous Singhalese ; Fiji its bronze-tinted giants, clothed in
crimson, white and blue. The black skins of many a
branch of the great Bantu family were seen on the London
pavement : Nigerians and Haussas from West Africa,
THE GATHERING OF AN EMPIRE 227
Sudanese and Swahelis from the centre and the east of the
Dark Continent, wearing the uniform of the King's African
Rifles. To them were added men of their race and colour
who had never seen their native wilds, the descendants of
West Indian slaves. The red tarbouch marked the
Mohammedan guardians of Cyprus, and the yellow Mongol
features of the Hong- Kong police told of England's post
of observation in the farthest East.
But the Orientals who attracted most attention wearing
the King's uniform were not those from the Levant or the
China Sea. The parks, in and around London, had been
turned into camps for the soldiers of the British Empire
chosen to take part in the military pageants of the Corona-
tion, and one of them was peopled with an imposing con-
tingent of the native troops of the Indian army. That
force, two hundred thousand strong, is recruited in every
region of the great peninsula, from Kashmir to Cape
Comorin, and from the Afghan hills to the delta of the
Godavery. To hail the Emperor of India it had sent to
England representatives of a vast array of races and of
castes. There were Tamils from Southern India, Telugus
from the East Coast, Mahrattas from the Deccan, Brahmins,
Jats and Rajputs from Oudh and Rajputana, Gurkhas from
Nepal, Sikhs from the Punjab, Afridis and other Pathans
from the wild borderland across the Indus, Hazaras from
Afghanistan and Mussulmans of diverse origin and locality.
The crowds admired the dark turbaned warriors in the
brilliant attire of Lancers or Guides, and felt a pride in
knowing that they formed part of the King's army, without,
however, quite understanding all that they signified. But
grey-headed men of war from the military clubs of Pall
Mall had their recollection taken back five-and-forty years
228 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
by the unaccustomed sight of some of these Indian uniforms.
They revived the heroic figures of Havelock, Outram and
the Lawrences ; they recalled pictures of the Residency at
Lucknow and of the Kashmir gate at Delhi ; they brought
back memories of how India was saved not only by the
gallant resistance of the British garrison, but by the loyal
fidelity of a remnant of the native army.
There was a popular resort, much frequented in those
summer days by the Indian and Colonial soldiers, whither
it was interesting to follow them. This was the Zoological
Gardens, where the collection of animals gives a vivid idea of
the extent of the British Empire. For of all the specimens,
with the exception of a few of European and South American
origin, there are scarcely any, from the camelopard to the
walrus, which are not found on British territory. It was
curious to notice that these settlers or natives from distant
British dominions saw for the first time in London the fauna
imported from the lands whence they came, excepting those
reduced to domesticity, like the elephant, the ostrich and
the camel. It was in the Regent's Park that the Bengal
Lancer first came face to face with the Bengal tiger, that
the Africander first heard the roar of the African lion, that
the Australian made the acquaintance of the kangaroo, and
that the Canadian saw the bison and the grizzly bear. Such
are the anomalies of imperial civilisation.
There were other striking objects on the gay scene of
London besides the men in uniform who thronged the
parks and pavements, and who sometimes stopped the
traffic of the streets when a squadron of them rode by,
equipped with that practical outfit which would have
astonished the light horsemen of the last century, from
Joachim Murat to Lord Cardigan. In all directions the
THE GATHERING OF AN EMPIRE 229
scarlet livery of England's royal house flashed past in the
sunlight. The King's guests, whether august kinsfolk from
the Courts of Europe, ambassadors from friendly republics,
Indian tributaries, or popular representatives from the
Colonies, were all treated like princes. Some of the
occupants of the state carriages bore names famous in the
annals of Europe. There was the heir of Scandinavia, the
son of England's firm friend, King Oscar, whose stature is
worthy of his realm of the Vikings, though the grandson of
Bernadotte is no northman, but the only monarch of French
blood who now sits upon a throne. There was the arch-
duke sent by the most venerated monarch of the Continent,
the much-tried and sagacious Francis Joseph of Austria.
There was the fair daughter of France, not unmindful of
the affectionate ties which once bound the house of Orleans
to the English royal family, with her husband, a gallant
prince of the line of Savoy, which partly to British sym-
pathy owed its crown of Italy. Half of the royal envoys
driving about in the summer afternoon were near relations
of our own sovereigns. A nephew of the King represented
the German Empire, while the Tsarewitch, a nephew of
Queen Alexandra, displayed the friendliness of Russia.
The connection of the royal house of England with the
reigning families of the Continent is a great influence to
preserve the peace of Europe. The days are over of
dynastic wars, and the kinship of sovereigns is often a
restraint on the bellicose instincts of their peoples.
The guests invited to the Coronation, whose passage
through the streets was indicated by the scarlet of the
servants who conducted them, were not all from Europe.
The eastern land of the future, Japan, had sent, to ratify its
alliance with England, an enlightened prince on the final
230 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
mission of his career which had begun amid the changeless
picturesque antiquity of the Orient, and which was soon to
end, when his nation after thirty years of the new regime
had become the civilised rival of European powers. Here
also were to be seen other Orientals whom civilisation
had invaded uninvited, great tributaries of the Emperor of
India, Maharajas whose gorgeous costume eclipsed the
colour of the royal liveries. In contrast to them were the
colonial matrons who, in virtue of the high constitutional
office of their husbands, tasted imperial joys as they rolled
along the highways of London in carriages of state.
CHAPTER III
THE ILLNESS OF THE KING
SUCH was the aspect of the capital when the days were
longest, in the summer of 1902. Ten days before the
date fixed for the Coronation a certain uneasiness had
been aroused by the news that the King was not well
enough to go to the races at Ascot, and that the entertain-
ments planned for the same week at Windsor Castle had
been given up. But these, it was felt, were only measures
of wise precaution to ensure the King's complete recovery
from a passing ailment before he encountered the fatigues
of the most solemn day of his life. So when on Mid-
summer Eve he came to London from Windsor and drove
to the Palace amid the acclamations of his subjects, all
anxiety was allayed. Nothing now could mar the long-
expected day but a caprice of the English climate, which,
however, gave promise of extending to King Edward the
favours vouchsafed to Queen Victoria on those occasions
when she graced with her presence a popular festival.
Even in the inmost circles of official society no misgiving
was felt. On that same Midsummer Eve a distinguished com-
pany had met at the house of a powerful minister. A more
notable gathering rarely took place in a London drawing-
room. There were few of those present who did not bear
names of some significance in the annals of the British
Empire, and the occasion which had brought together
232 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
these men and women added an air of exhilaration which is
usually absent from a political rout. Nothing was more
interesting than to note and to compare the various types of
British subjects who had attained high place in the mother-
country and her colonies. Side by side with the familiar
figures of English statesmen were others whose names
were better known in the world of London than were their
features. Here was a sturdy north-country emigrant who
had become the popular leader of a democracy whose terri-
tory stretches far towards the Antarctic Ocean ; here a
colonist, born under the Southern Cross, who had been
chosen first Prime Minister of a new Commonwealth ; here
an English settler, on another southern shore, who needed
all the opportunist art imputed to him to hold the balance
between rival races in the war-torn land of his adoption ;
here the party chief of a great Dominion, who, though he
bore on his refined face the traces of ancient Latin civilisa-
tion, was as loyal a servant of the Crown as any statesman
of Anglo-Saxon stock. Besides the elected ministers of
self-governing communities were to be seen men of various
origin and training, who had been sent from England to
administer distant and diverse colonies, some with orna-
mental, others with almost autocratic powers, recruited
from the historic peerage, from the rich industrial class,
from the camp, from the common-room, from the bureau-
cracy of Whitehall. Fellow-subjects of the King who with
varied functions had, in every climate of the world, helped
to consolidate the British Empire, met for the first time
beneath the roof of a minister who had concentrated all his
versatile powers to encourage the imperial idea. Of that
idea the solemn consecration was to be the Coronation,
which was on the lips and in the thoughts of all the guests
THE ILLNESS OF THE KING 233
amid that brilliant company. When they took their leave
in the first hour of the midsummer morning many a tryst
was given for the day after the morrow in Westminster
Abbey. For of all the millions who woke up in London
a few hours later, whether privileged persons for whom
places were reserved within the sacred precinct, or humble
citizens whose theatre of loyalty was to be the street, none
had any disquiet, except a small group of anxious watchers
within the Royal Palace.
Midsummer Day broke with unclouded splendour. The
sun was warm, the sky was clear, just as it used to be
when the Feast of St John the Baptist was the people's
holiday of merry England. The radiant tradition of that
olden time seemed to be revived. From an early hour the
streets were filled by a light-hearted crowd, rambling gaily
beneath the festoons and the arches under which the royal
procession was to pass forty-eight hours later. The last
rehearsal of the Coronation service was to take place that
morning at Westminster Abbey. Some of those invited to
it were delayed in their passage by the joyous holiday-
makers who blocked the way, and on entering the Gothic
vestibule which flanked the western door the distant sound
of chanting told them that the repetition had begun.
The ancient Abbey, always dim, had had its light further
veiled by the scaffolds erected for the spectators of the
Coronation ; so to those who entered it from the sun-
light the vista of the nave was at first obscure. But
any effect of solemnity produced by the sudden shade
was, on days of rehearsal, removed by the air of anima-
tion which pervaded the building. It is a well-known fact
that rehearsals of religious offices, in all churches and in
all lands, are rarely conducted with reverential decorum,
234 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
and the preliminary performances of the Coronation cere-
monial formed no exception to the rule. So on those days
of preparation the Abbey was a bustling scene, from the
old altar-steps to the outer porch, hung, to disguise its
newness, with armour and with tapestry, and placarded with
the names of great officers of State who there were to await
the sovereign on the Coronation morning. Peers tried on
their coronets ; ecclesiastics compared their vestments ;
pages and heralds, maids of honour and statesmen practised
their paces for the procession. But on this midsummer
forenoon there was a hushed stillness in the approaches to
the sanctuary which was not the effect of contrast between
the blare of the glaring street and the calm of the softly-lit
Abbey. No hurrying, talking groups moved over the
emblazoned carpet stretched the length of the now deserted
nave. Beyond the screen, whence came subdued strains
of chanting, it seemed as though a solemn service were
in progress and not a mere recital of music. Within the
choir this impression was heightened. What meant the
spectacle of all these people devoutly kneeling while a
Bishop in suppliant tones said the Litany and the singers
above sang the responses with a pathos which seemed
uncalled-for? Why, too, did the aged Dean, in trembling
accents, pronounce the blessing which had no place in this
portion of the liturgy? If other rehearsals erred on the
side of irreverence, this tragic realism in the repetition of a
festal rite seemed not less inappropriate.
The voice of the chief conductor of the music telling
his singers and musicians to go home soon explained the
lamentable mystery. The life of the King was in peril.
At that moment it was depending on the skill and sureness
of a surgeon's hand, and the people of the realm, un-
THE ILLNESS OF THE KING 235
conscious as yet of the sudden misfortune, were about to
enter a period of anxiety such as had never beset a loyal
population. When thrilling news is brought to a numerous
assembly of persons, they usually linger, in twos and threes,
to discuss it. But the tidings of the King's illness had such
a dazing effect on those who had met on the very spot
where he was to be crowned, at that very hour two days
later, that no sooner had the plaintive sound of prayer died
away than they silently and swiftly departed. Then for a
short space of time one small group remained in the empty
Abbey, where the tiers of seats, reared up against the blue
and gold of the tapestried walls, looked down upon the
thrones and the ancient Coronation chair standing ready, in
their appointed places, for the joyful pageant. The sudden
solitude and silence of the great church, decked out with
festal trappings, was overpowering. It left an indelible
impression on the young mind of one who stood there,
a boy of ten years old, who at this unforeseen moment of
national crisis received his first lesson in the vicissitudes of
human things, amid historical surroundings of solemn and
imposing import.
The contrast was acute between the sombre stillness of
the deserted Abbey and the clamorous gaiety outside; for
London was a great pleasure fair that morning. It often
happens that a man, stricken with grief or anxiety, passes
through a bright scene of merrymaking and feels how unim-
portant to the laughing crowd is his interior dejection, how
out of keeping his mood is with the sunshine. It was a
different sensation that was experienced by those who, aware
of the King's illness, passed through the unconscious streets of
London at noon on Midsummer Day 1902. For they knew
that, before another hour, the gloom which afflicted them
236 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
would overrun the million holiday-makers now parading t,he
town unsuspicious of their coming disappointment.
When at last, with amazing rapidity, the ill news ran
through the crowded city, the attitude of the people could
not but stir the national pride of every Englishman who
witnessed it. It was feared that the populace, which at
times of patriotic rejoicing had sometimes given way to
unbecoming license, might display some signs of resentment
at the ruin of its pleasuring. If a disorderly element,
capable of such action, was abroad in London on that day
of disillusion it was kept in check by the sober grief of the
vast majority. The conduct of the people was admirable.
Not a word of complaint was heard ; not an indication of
anger was perceived ; though, in addition to the forfeiture of
a long-dreamed-of holiday, the material loss which fell upon
thousands of the humble subjects of the King, when the
Coronation was postponed, must have been grievous and
hard to bear. Yet no other sentiment than that of sym-
pathetic sorrow was expressed by the population of the
disappointed city, and by its guests from every corner of
the Empire. The aspect of London that afternoon, when a
great quietness had fallen on the crowded streets, was a
striking proof that the loyalty of the British democracy was
not the outcome of a craving for spectacle and amusement.
The popular sentiment, inspired by the Imperial Crown, of
which we have essayed to trace the genesis and the evolu-
tion, was put to a keen test on that unlucky day, and the
English people endured its trial in a way which compelled
the admiration of foreign nations wherein no such influence
exists.
CHAPTER IV
WESTMINSTER ABBEY
I
WHEN the King had been saved from the danger
which menaced his life, his recovery was so rapid
that he was able to announce to his people that
he would proceed to Westminster Abbey to be crowned on
August 9th, 1902, only six weeks and two days after the
date originally appointed for the Coronation. This decision
gave profound satisfaction in the Empire. It was felt that
no premature risk would be advised by the prudent surgeons
whose skill, seconded by the strength and courage of the
King, had exorcised a national misfortune. It was there-
fore certain that King Edward had completely regained his
health and physical forces which he had inherited from his
illustrious mother, whose sound and robust vigour was the
wonder and pride of her people.
Only in one respect was the Coronation, by reason of its
postponement, deprived of any of its circumstance. The
special missions sent by foreign powers to represent their
governments at Westminster Abbey were compelled to
depart without waiting for the King's recovery. The
princes and ambassadors who had come to London in June
on behalf of the old and young powers of the world, to
salute the most venerable crown in Christendom, were timed
to take their leave in the early days of July. Some of the
238 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
envoys so accredited had travelled from the uttermost
ends of the earth to pay respect to the King of England,
and their absence could no longer be extended. Others
from less remote lands had also urgent duties waiting for them
at home. Moreover, when the time for which the embassies
had been invited came to an end, the speedy termination of
the King's illness could not be predicted, and it was not
possible for the hospitable Court of England to retain its
guests for an indeterminate period, even if they could con-
veniently have stayed. The special ambassadors had there-
fore, to their deep regret, to leave our shores without ful-
filling their high mission, and, to avoid invidious distinction,
only those were invited to return who were members of
reigning families of the near kindred of the King and
Queen of England.
The absence of the other dignified envoys, much as it was
deplored, did not diminish either the outward splendour or
the inward significance of the coronation of Edward VII.
Princes from neighbouring Courts and special embassies
attend every coronation which takes place in Europe. But
the solemn inauguration of the reign of King Edward
presented a feature which was never seen at any similar
ceremony, ancient or modern. His coronation was not
only the renewal of an immemorial rite, the perpetuation of
which puts England at the head of all nations in point of
antique tradition. It was the consecration of a great
Empire which had grown around the old monarchy and
which owed its development and consolidation to the
influence of the crown formally assumed by the sovereign
on that day. Proud as we were to welcome foreign
spectators to our imperial festival, it was not their amicable
presence, in greater or less number, which gave to the
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 239
pageant in Westminster Abbey its peculiar character. The
distinctive feature of the ceremony was the attendance on
the King of his faithful subjects from lands beyond the
seas, mingling in the ancient shrine with the representatives
of national institutions which, in various stages of their
development, had sent delegates to take part, on the same
spot, in the coronation of at least thirty of his predecessors,
during a period of eight hundred years. The coronation of
Edward VII. was thus essentially a domestic celebration of
the British race united by the influence of the Imperial
Crown, which was for the first time assumed as the specific
symbol of world-wide empire.
II
The Coronation Day did not dawn with the unclouded
radiancy which had marked the morning first appointed for
the ceremony. But though a renewal of the resplendent
atmosphere, which for once had encircled the British Isles,
could not, in the course of nature, be expected, Saturday,
August 9, 1902, was a favourable specimen of an English
summer's day. The sun shone with that bashful timidity
with which it usually approaches the capital of the British
Empire. Its subdued light was in keeping with the
mood of a people which had lately passed through a
season of trial and anxiety. For reasons not of a senti-
mental order, the mildness of the sunshine was a
merciful gift of Heaven. For had the sky of London
smouldered with the dog-day sultriness which it some-
times assumes in August, the sufferings would have been
grievous of the loyal crowds and of the troops, filling
240 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
and lining the streets through which the royal proces-
sions passed. The temperate day was well fitted for a
great popular spectacle, and it came to an end without
any of those accidents which have often cast a gloom over
public rejoicings in many lands.
It is a truth which forces itself upon every observer
of human life, that all the occupations of mankind, out-
side the daily round of inexorable duty, are too long.
The voluntary pursuits which men and women impose
upon themselves have a duration more appropriate
to the years of Seth and Enos than to those of post-
diluvian man. The banquet, the comedy, the outdoor
sport, the indoor pastime, the religious office, the political
speech, each takes up a weary length of time out
of all proportion with the number of hours in each
day of those allotted to our span of existence, too
brief for all which ought to be accomplished in it.
The Coronation of the King of England was one of
the rare spectacles, offered to mortal eyes in modern
times, which was not only not too long, but which
ended too soon. Even to those who arrived in the
early morning at Westminster Abbey and spent seven
or eight hours there, the time seemed short — such
was the varied splendour and historical significance of
the scene.
The ancient fabric of the Abbey was less disfigured
and disguised than at previous coronations by the con-
struction of the "theatre," from which the privileged
guests witnessed the anointing and crowning of the
King and Queen. The decorations of the temporary
tribunes, in blue and gold, were in sober good taste and
set off the crimson which, being worn by nearly eight
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 241
hundred peers and peeresses, was the prevailing colour
in the auditory. The King, after he had been crowned,
as he sat on his throne on a raised platform midway
between the sanctuary and the choir, was the centre
of a picture of marvellous beauty and interest. On his
left hand, on a somewhat lower level, was the Queen's
throne. The face of the King was turned towards the
high altar, beyond which he could see the vaulted vista of
the eastern roof, no seats having been erected above
the reredos, as at the coronation of Queen Victoria.
Within the sanctuary, around the time-stained Coronation
Chair, were the archbishops, the other lords spiritual and
the prebendaries of Westminster, together with the Earl
Marshal, surrounded by the nobles and other great officers
who had taken part in the ceremony. At the right hand of
the King's throne were the princes of the blood, and behind
them, ranged on tiers of seats, rising from the floor of the
south transept, were the peers, robed in crimson and ermine,
according to their rank, and wearing their coronets. On
the left hand of the Queen's throne, similarly placed and
habited, were the peeresses and dowager peeresses. In
mid-air, above the two transepts, were deep galleries
occupied by the members of the House of Commons and
their wives. At the rear of the thrones was the choir,
with the sombre background of its antique stalls, which
were occupied by foreign princes and ambassadors, by
privy councillors who had attained high official place at
home and in the colonies, by Indian rajahs, and by
delegates of the Church of Scotland — a curiously variegated
company representing the might, the statesmanship, the
diverse creeds and races of the British Empire, as well as
the dynastic pride and the diplomacy of friendly alien
242 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
powers. Above the choir were the singers and musicians
in white and scarlet and gold. Beyond the screen, upon
which some of them were placed, were the long, narrow
lines of the nave, shorn of its aisles, its galleries filled with
exalted knights of the orders of chivalry in their mantles,
red-robed judges of the land, and a host of other notables-
warriors and priests, ediles and proctors, all in their varied
costumes of office.
The foregoing view of the interior of Westminster Abbey,
though far from exhaustive, will give some idea of the dis-
tribution of the company within its walls. Having obtained
it, we will turn back to the early hours, when the King's
guests were assembling, in order from that point to follow
the proceedings of the day. If we do so with sufficient
detail we shall be able to gain some impression of the com-
position of the political and social elements of the British
Empire at the beginning of the twentieth century. For
most of them were represented at the great national festival.
In so studying the forces of the Empire we may also be able
to perceive incidentally in what respects the Coronation of
Edward VII. differed from the imposing ceremonies of
similar character, which we have already observed as having
taken place in England and on the continent of Europe
in the nineteenth century. There will, however, be one
essential point of diversity between our treatment of the
solemnities of the past and that of the Coronation of King
Edward. Whatever persons are named as having been
present in Westminster Abbey on August Qth, 1902, it will
not be permissible to appreciate their character or to appraise
their public services. Their names do not yet belong to
history, and they can be mentioned only as types and
products of the age.
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 243
III
It had already been decided before the illness of the King
that the Form and Order of the Coronation should be less
long than when Queen Victoria was crowned.1 It was thus
arranged that the homage, heretofore done severally by all
the peers, should be performed by the Primate of All
England for the Lords Spiritual, and by the senior of each
degree for the Lords Temporal. The service was further
shortened, to spare the convalescent forces of the King, by
the omission of the sermon and the displacement of the
Litany, which was sung by the Bishops of Bath-and-Wells
and of Oxford on the steps of Henry VI I. 's chapel before
the arrival of the royal processions. This invisible service,
of which only faint strains reached the choir and transepts,
was an interesting feature of the ritual. The regalia was
brought, by the venerable Chapter of Westminster, from
the Jerusalem Chamber, where it had lain overnight, to
the chapel of Edward the Confessor behind the high
altar. Then, when the Litany had been sung and the oil
in the ampulla had been hallowed by an episcopal member
of the Chapter, Bishop Welldon, the regalia was taken in
procession through the crowded Abbey to the western
vestibule and there delivered by the prebendaries to the
peers who were to bring it to the sanctuary.2
1 On July i, 1902, the Archbishop of Canterbury was ordered, by the King in Council, to
inspect the Office of Divine Service to be used for their Majesties' Coronation, and to con-
sider how it might be abridged consistently with the solemnity of the occasion. See
Appendix II.
2 The Procession of the Regalia was composed of the King's Scholars of Westminster,
the choirs of the Abbey and of the Chapel Royal, and the canons and minor-canons of
Westminster. The Queen's Sceptre was carried by Deputy-Minor-Canon Akin-Sneath, the
Queen's Ivory Rod by Minor-Canon Perkins, the Sceptre with the Cross by Minor-Canon
Hine-Haycock, the Sceptre with the Dove by Minor-Canon Greatorex, the Orb with the
Cross by Minor-Canon Cheadle, St Edward's Staff by the Precentor, Minor-Canon Daniell-
Bainbridge, the Patin by Bishop Welldon, the Chalice by Canon Henson, the Holy Bible
244 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
A sweeter sound even than that of the choirs was heard
in the sanctuary while the assembled congregation was
waiting for the royal processions. High above the hum of
conversation arose the clear voices of little children. In the
royal box, on the south side of the high altar, Prince Edward
and Prince Albert of Wales awaited the arrival of their
mother and exchanged bright comments on the brilliant
scene, unconscious that, in a similar pageant, one of them
would take the leading part, when all the chief actors in
that of to-day had departed.
The young princes had not long to wait. The first of
the royal processions came forth from nave and choir, the
daughters of the King, in the order of their birth, taking the
lead. The Princess Louise, Duchess of Fife, with her little
daughter beside her, the Princess Victoria, and the Princess
Maud, married to her cousin Prince Charles of Denmark,
formed a trio of graceful stateliness as they passed slowly
through the admiring ranks of their father's subjects. Not
less stately were the sisters of the King, the three noble
daughters of Queen Victoria, the Princess Helena, the
Princess Louise, Duchess of Argyll, and the Princess
Beatrice, who inherited from their mother the majestic
carriage which made her, in spite of her lowly stature, the
most imposing monarch of Europe. After them came two
princesses of the royal house by right of marriage, the
Duchess of Connaught, whose father was the valiant Red
by Canon Robinson, the Queen's Crown by Archdeacon Wilberforce, and the Imperial
Crown by Sub-Dean Duckworth, who had placed on the high altar Saint Edward's Crown.
Dean Bradley was too infirm to take part in this procession, though he came later to the
western "Annexe," to walk to the altar with the Royal Procession. On its way to the
west door the Procession of the Regalia sang the eighteenth -century hymn, "O God,
our help in ages past," by Isaac Watts, chosen by Sir Frederick Bridge, the chief con-
ductor of the Coronation music, as the contribution of English Nonconformity to the great
national service.
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 245
Prince, accompanied by her fair daughters, and the Duchess
of Albany, widow of the accomplished Prince Leopold,
whose son, also here to-day, went from Eton to reign at
Coburg. Two aged forms in the procession represented
the generation of George III.'s descendants earlier than
that of King Edward. The Grand Duchess of Mecklen-
burg-Strelitz had been present here in the Abbey sixty-
four years before at the coronation of Queen Victoria, as
had also her venerable brother, who followed her, leaning
on his staff — the Duke of Cambridge, who for two months
in the year 1819 was heir-presumptive to the crown of
England.1
In a second procession came the royal guests, represent-
ing the reigning families of the Continent most closely
connected by kinship with the King and Queen, but they
did not advance beyond the choir, where we shall find
them presently. Then followed the procession of the
Prince and Princess of Wales. The sentiment inspired
by the heir-apparent and his consort, as they passed in
their robes of Estate through the expectant crowd, was
not merely one of deferential curiosity. The people of
England and of the Empire regard the royal couple with
a feeling of profound gratitude and affection for their
participation in the life and interests of the subjects of
the King. Moreover the daughter of the lamented
1 Prince George of Cambridge, from his birthday on March 26, 1819, remained heir to the
crown till May 24 of that year, when the Princess Alexandrina Victoria was born to the Duke
of Kent. The last King of Hanover, whose father was older than the Duke of Cambridge,
but younger than the Duke of Kent, was never heir-presumptive, having been born three days
after his cousin Queen Victoria. Among other persons present at both the coronations of
Queen Victoria and of King Edward was Sir Spencer Ponsonby-Fane, who led this pro-
cession, and has already been mentioned in this connection (p. 136), and Mr R. N. Cust, thr
eminent orientalist, who came as a boy from Eton to the coronation in 1838, having also been
present as a child of ten at the coronation of William IV. in 1831.
246 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Princess Mary has justified the popular choice which
designated her as the mother of our kings to be. Sicut
vitis abundans was the supreme quality ascribed, by the
founder of a great dynasty of kings, to the perfect wife
who should bring blessing to her husband ; and in the
future queen of a mighty realm, that quality blesses not
only her husband, but the people over whom he will
one day rule. For nothing is more requisite to the quiet
and prosperous governance of a monarchy than the estab-
lishment, in the direct line, of the succession to the crown.
Proud of her maternity, the admirable young mother took
her place in the sanctuary between her sons, they the
hope of England, and she a pattern of domestic dignity
to the flower of English womanhood here before her
eyes. Never in the history of civilisation was such an
example more beneficial. For, in other lands as well as
in ours, a tendency of the present age, of social and
material transition, is for women of the wealthy classes to
work for the dissolution of society by repudiating the home
and the family, which are its essential bases. Conse-
quently, the restraining influence of one who stands upon
the steps of the throne may have the most salutary effect
on the nation, while it so displays the advantage of
monarchical institutions.
The Prince and Princess of Wales came to the Corona-
tion fresh from a great act of imperial work. The
voyage of the heir-apparent to the Colonies, in the
first months of the new reign, was a fitting prelude to the
Coronation of King Edward, on whose behalf he visited
every one of the self-governing communities of the Empire
beyond the seas. At each stage of his journey of fifty
thousand miles, by land and by water, he had quickened
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 247
by his presence and his inspiring eloquence the imperial
sentiment of vigorous democracies, whose chief bond of
union is their loyalty to the Crown which his father was
now about to assume. Nor was it the first time that the
outlying populations of the Empire had hailed the prince.
Wearing the blue of the navy, which is the chief guardian
of that Empire, in childhood and in early manhood he had
sailed in all the seas which wash the many shores where
flies the British flag. In all the vast assemblage of the
most famous subjects of the King there was none who had
accomplished worthier work for the Empire than the Prince
of Wales ; not only for his rank but for his imperial services
did he merit the place to which he was conducted in front
of all the temporal peers.
IV
Between the arrival of the minor royal processions and
that which escorted their Majesties there was an interval
which afforded time to make note of the persons composing
the vast assembly, brilliant in the purple and crimson and
gold of their robes of state. We will take that opportunity
of passing in review some of the members of the imposing
company who, by their origin, position or achievements,
were representative of their age, so that their enumeration
may give some idea of the forces of the British Empire, as
well as of its relations with the other powers of the world,
at the moment when Edward VII. assumed the Imperial
Crown. There were nearly eight thousand people present
at the Coronation in Westminster Abbey. In that multitude,
including the Estates of the realm, the envoys of foreign
nations, the delegates from India and the Colonies, and a
248 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
host of the King's subjects who had rendered services to
the Empire in Church and State, in arms and in diplomacy,
in art, in science, on the judgment-seat and in the local
council, there was a vast number of bearers of distinguished
names. It is evident that only a small fraction of these
persons, eminent in their various lines of life, can be men-
tioned here. It is probable, also, that some of those whose
names are recorded will seem to be less important than
others who are passed in silence. But the few who have
been singled out for mention are for the most part those
who represent a class, a type, a principle or a policy, in
addition to the nobles and ecclesiastics who took a con-
spicuous part in the ceremony of the Coronation.
Although, as we have seen, the special embassies sent by
foreign powers to the Coronation of Edward VII. had to
return to their homes without fulfilling their missions, when
the King fell ill, a goodly number of members of the reign-
ing houses of Europe came back to see him crowned. Those
who so returned were all of the nearest kindred of the King
and Queen. In this capacity one reigning Prince took his
seat in the choir of Westminster Abbey, though it is not
customary for sovereign rulers to attend coronations. This
was the Grand Duke of Hesse, the eldest son of the
Princess Alice, whose name became a household word in
England for her devotion to her father, on an anniversary
of whose death she fell a victim to maternal piety. Next
him sat the heir of Greece, whose title might have been
borne by Leonidas, with his wife, niece of King Edward
and sister of the German Emperor. The Duke of Sparta
represented his father, King George of the Hellenes, a
monarch unequalled in Europe for sagacity and states-
manship, and the brother of Queen Alexandra. Two of
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 249
his other sons were conspicuous in the choir by their
manly bearing, Prince George, High Commissioner of
Crete, and his young brother, Prince Andrew of Greece.
Next the Duke of Sparta sat his uncle, the brother of our
Queen, the Crown Prince of Denmark, representing the
venerable king, whose progeny rivals the house of Saxe-
Coburg and Gotha in its faculty for mounting and adorning
thrones. On the other side of the choir were placed
Prince and Princess Henry of Prussia, both grandchildren of
Queen Victoria, he a son of the revered Empress Frederick,
she another child of our Princess Alice. Next to them was
a royal couple from the restless Balkans — the Crown Prince
of Roumania, with his wife, a Princess of Saxe-Coburg,
but born a maid of Kent when her father was Duke of
Edinburgh. The kinship of the English royal family with
the reigning houses of Europe is a potent power in preserv-
ing the peace of the world. The days of dynastic wars are
past. Politicians and journalists stir up strife between
nations, but the affectionate ties which bind the families of
their rulers form an influence to smooth their quarrels.
There is no need to be in the secrets of diplomacy to know
the value to Europe of the fact that the German Emperor
is King Edward's nephew, that the Empress of Russia
is his niece, and that the Tsar is the nephew of Queen
Alexandra.
In the absence of the envoys extraordinary the ambassa-
dors accredited to the Court of St James's represented their
governments at the Coronation. One special mission had,
however, remained. The Ras Makunen, whose title had a
sound of the Happy Valley, came from Abyssinia, with his
dark face and his white robes, to represent the line descended
from the Queen of Sheba and a Christian Church older than
250 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
the oldest stone of Westminster Abbey.1 The dean of the
diplomatic body in London, who sat at the head of his
colleagues, was the aged M. de Staal, at the end of his long
career which had begun ten years before the death of his
first august master Nicholas I. of Russia, whose grandson
the Grand Duke Michael sat also in the choir, not as a
stranger to England. Opposite the Russian ambassador
was the exponent of the high-bred traditions of Austrian
diplomacy, Count Deym, the lord of many acres in Bohe-
mia, who like his predecessor Count Karolyi, a Hungarian
magnate, illustrated the heterogeneous quality of the Dual
Monarchy. At the Coronation of Queen Victoria every
diplomatist present had been associated with the French
Revolution and its sequel. At the Coronation of King
Edward the ambassador of France, in the next stall, alone
of his colleagues represented that page of history, both by
his kinship with Cambon the financier of the Convention and
by his having first proved his merit in the administrative hier-
archy founded by Napoleon. For M. Paul Cambon and
his brother, two of the most eminent French ambassadors of
their time, had both been prefects of departments, once more
proving that, at all events in the land of Talleyrand, for
success in the highest walks of diplomacy, an early diplo-
matic training is not essential. On the other side of the
choir was the ambassador of friendly Italy, who was born
a subject of the House of Savoy when the capital of its
united kingdom was at Turin. Next to him was the pic-
turesque figure of the German ambassador, whose name of
Metternich was formerly better known in the annals of
1 In Milner's History of the Church, which was written soon after the publication of Bruce's
account of his celebrated journey to Abyssinia (1770-72), the author, relating the well-known
legend of ^Edesius and Framentius, who brought Christianity to that country in the fourth
century, says, "The latter was Prime Minister. Bruce would call him the Ras."
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 251
Austria than in those of Prussia. Less decorative was the
aspect of the ambassador of the United States, denied by
his government official clothing in which to appear on occa-
sions of ceremony. The interdiction of uniform to Ameri-
can diplomatists is said to be a token of "republican simpli-
city." But it is not quite clear why to don a uniform de-
noting that the wearer is the servant of a democracy is a
less democratic act than to put on plain clothes of a par-
ticular form which, in English-speaking nations used for
evening dress, are worn only by the opulent as a visible
class distinction. In the simpler days of the United States
the ceremonial costume by daylight of their representatives
abroad was not ordained to be that of a strayed reveller.1
Not that the diplomatic uniforms of Europe are so graceful
as to deserve imitation. Indeed it is to be regretted that
our ally Japan, whose representative2 sat by the German
1 It would not be becoming for an Englishman to remark upon the official costume of any
foreign guest of his government, unless his observations were inspired in the land whence the
guest and the costume came. In this case they were suggested by the highest American
authority on the subject — the eminent citizen chosen by the United States government as its
special ambassador at the Coronation. Mr Whitelaw Reid, on the eve of his departure on
the mission, which the illness of the King unhappily prevented him from fulfilling, made a bril-
liant speech at a banquet offered to him at the Union League Club of New York. In it, he
showed, with great humour and by historical reference, that in days when the sumptuary
ideas of Americans were simpler than now, from 1814 to 1853, appropriate uniform
was prescribed for the diplomatic envoys of the United States. A writer in Notes and
Queries made the discovery that the costume worn by Mr Choate at the Coronation was that
of George Washington. He might as well have said it was the costume of Christopher
Columbus— for it was not invented till forty years after Washington's death. Even in France,
where the habit noir is worn by daylight as a ceremonial dress, it is decidedly a badge of class
distinction. Its adoption at weddings and on other occasions of ceremony is the first sign
that its wearer thinks he is emerging from the ranks of the democracy and is becoming a
Monsieur. Lanfrey, the historian, when ambassador at Berne, began to wear it in the place
of the diplomatic uniform of the Republic, but his example was not followed. Mr White-
law Reid informs me that, at the Coronation of Queen Victoria, the United States Minister,
Mr Andrew Stevenson of Virginia, wore a uniform which included a three-cornered hat,
adorned with a golden eagle, and a sword in a white scabbard.
2The Viscount Hayashi and the Marquis de Several, the ministers respectively of Japan
and of Portugal in London, were appointed as special ambassadors at the Coronation,
252 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
ambassador, has discarded its flowing flowery robes for the
buttons and breeches of the occidental tailor.
There were other Orientals seated in the choir calling for
special notice, or we might prolong our review of the foreign
diplomatic body, which included the ambassador of Portugal,1
whose navigators showed us the way to the Far East and
whose sovereign, the faithful friend of England, is the cousin
of King Edward. Ranged against the screen in the places
of highest canonical honour, were a row of Indian feuda-
tories, whose jewels rivalled in splendour those of the regalia
which they had come to see assumed by their imperial
suzerain. In the stall of the canon residentiary sat the
Maharajah of Jaipur, the lord of the coral city where he pre-
sides over the solemn worship of the Hindu Sun-god. By
him was another Rajput prince, the Maharajah of Bikaner,
and then the Maharajah of Idar, better known as the gal-
lant Sir Pertab Singh, whose adopted son Doulat Singh
escorted the Prince of Wales in his procession. Near
them were the young Maharajah of Gwalior from Central
India, who served with the British forces in China ; the
Maharajah of Kolhapur, descendant of the founder of the
ancient Maratha Empire ; and the Maharajah of Cooch-
Behar, a brilliant officer of Bengal Cavalry, with his
gentle Maharanee beside him. Then at the end of a
row of divines of the Church of Scotland was seen the
intelligent face of the Aga Khan, not a warrior like the
resplendent tributary princes, but a theologian like the
Moderator of the General Assembly, and the powerful
head of a sect of Mahomedans more numerous than the
followers of John Knox. It was perhaps to symbolise
the impartiality of the British Empire to its various
1 See footnote 2 on the preceding page.
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 253
creeds which are professed between the Clyde and the
Nerbudda, that the Speaker of the House of Commons
with his unbiassed gravity was made to sit in the midst
of this composite group.
Their fellow-subjects of the King on whom the Indian
potentates looked from the capitular stalls, must have
impressed them with the world-wide extent of the British
Empire, which had absorbed their ancient domains. Not
far from them sat the Prime Minister of the Canadian
Dominion in his knightly robes of blue. No more accom-
plished statesman could be counted among all the Privy
Councillors of King Edward VII. than Sir Wilfrid Laurier.
For though speaking the tongue of his French ancestors as
it was spoken in the days of Racine, he had so mastered
the language of his allegiance that when his voice was heard
in London among the first orators of the day, his English
eloquence, in grace of diction, was unequalled. Close to
him was Mr Seddon, the Prime Minister of New Zealand,
the most advanced democrat who ever wore the uniform
of the Privy Council, whose patriotism and loyalty to the
Crown and to the Empire both represented and encouraged
the imperial sentiment of the distant democracy of which he
was the popular leader. On the north side of the choir sat
the first Prime Minister of the Australian Commonwealth, of
which the first parliament was opened at Melbourne, by the
heir to the crown, just fifteen months before the Coronation.
It was right that a son of New South Wales, the mother
colony of Australia, should be called to that high office,
and it was fitting that a statesman who held Sir Edmund
Barton's views on the military relations of England and
her colonies should represent the new Commonwealth at
the great imperial festival. Sir Robert Bond, the Prime
254 THE CORONATION OP EBAVARD VII.
Minister of the oldest British colony, Newfoundland, sat up
above the black chief of the Barotsis, who came from that
newest territory acquired by English pioneers, which was
named after their leader, Cecil Rhodes, whose incomplete
career in the service of the Empire had closed five
months before the Coronation. The political leader of
Cape Colony had been called back to his parliament.
But pacified South Africa was represented by the
Prime Minister of loyal Natal, Sir Albert Hime, an
Irish soldier, who had gallantly fought the Zulus in the
intervals of a legislative career. The Crown Colonies were
represented by two governors of singularly different type.
Sir West Ridgway, an old Afghan campaigner, had gone
from Dublin Castle to govern Ceylon, the loveliest tropical
possession of the Empire. Sir Walter Sendall, a polished
classical scholar, had found his work less congenial at the
Local Government Board than when he was sent to rule
over the home of the Paphian Queen, and over other islands
further west, of which Horace had never heard.
Among the British statesmen in the choir there were two
political opponents who had more in common with one
another than with most of their respective colleagues. Sir
Michael Hicks- Beach, wearing for the last time the robes
of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, represented the race
of country gentlemen, for a century and a half supreme in
the government of England, but now grown rare in the House
of Commons even on Conservative benches. H is predecessor
at the Treasury, Sir William Vernon Harcourt, a cadet of
ancient family and the grandson of the Archbishop of York,
whom we saw at the coronation of Queen Victoria, would
not have been out of place in a Cabinet in the days of
Rockingham and of Shelburne. Both statesmen possessed
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 255
that great tradition of English parliamentary life which, now
no longer handed down as a heritage, deserves to be
saluted as a noble relic of the historic past. The new era
has created a new type of political leader, of which Mr
Chamberlain was the most remarkable example present at
the Coronation. No man of his age has with greater
lucidity reflected the movement of democratic opinion or
has guided, it with more practical effect. This faculty he
applied, on his arrival at the Colonial Office, to directing
the loyal feeling for the Crown which the venerable figure
of Queen Victoria had aroused throughout the Empire, and
this he did with such resolute energy as to cause a profound
impression in the Colonies as well as in Great Britain.
The official Opposition was represented by two eminent
Liberals, Sir Henry Campbell- Bannerman and Mr Herbert
Gladstone, the inheritors of the leadership and of the name of
the last great parliamentarian who, before he found a resting-
place here in the Abbey, by one of his later acts of policy,
changed perhaps the future history of party government and
of parliamentary institutions. Among other members of the
Opposition present in the choir was Sir Charles Dilke, who
educated the Radicals in imperialism, which education had
momentous results after the disruption of the Liberal party,
and who invented the term " Greater Britain," from which
expression British opinion has unanimously withdrawn the
United States, which the author included in it.
On the other side a picturesque figure was Mr George
Wyndham, the descendant of Lord Edward Fitzgerald and
of Pamela, two of the most romantic products of the Irish
and the French revolutions, and the only Chief Ssecretary,
who ever wore the mantle of the chancellor of the order of
Saint Patrick, disposed to apply to the government of the
256 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
most imaginative people in the Empire the gifts of imagina-
tion. Another exponent of literary culture was Mr Bryce,1
like Sir William Anson and Sir Richard Jebb, who sat
among the members of the House of Commons, a repre-
sentative of the professorial caste, of which the appearance
in public life is a wholesome antidote to the invasion of
parliament by the plutocracy. For a cognate reason one
other Privy Councillor seated in the choir was an object of
unique interest. Mr Asquith was the only classical scholar of
Balliol, under the most famous mastership of modern Oxford,
who, when the King was crowned, had made a mark in the
political world. It is a current belief that when a youth
has won " the Balliol scholarship " (by which is meant one
of the three scholarships annually awarded for classics by
that college) it is the first step towards a brilliant future.
But of about seventy scholars thus elected when Mr Jowett
was master from 1870 to 1893, onty three have attained
eminence in any branch of public life.2 The scholars of Balliol
were not educated under a retiring sage, who taught them
to love the secluded paths of learning. Mr Jowett was an
academical Dr Smiles, who stimulated his disciples to strive
after worldly success. The failure of his most industrious
l Had Mr John Morley and Mr Lecky not been prevented from attending the Coronation
they would have been mentioned in the first line of men of letters who were members of King
Edward's first Parliament and of his Privy Council.
» The other two are the Bishop of Worcester, who was at the Coronation, and the High
Commissioner of South Africa. Several other former classical scholars of Balliol, under the
mastership of Jowett, have obtained honourable positions in the University and in other
academical careers, but the secretum iter et fallentis semita vita seem to have claimed the
majority after their brilliant boyhood. The result of my investigation seemed so startling that
I referred it to Mr Lyttleton Gell, who was a distinguished modern history scholar of Balliol,
and who knows more about the careers of Balliol men than any other member of the college.
Mr Gell could only corroborate what I had ascertained, and he attributed it to the system
of "spoon-feeding" candidates for the highest honours at Oxford. Balliol scholars of earlier
generations, before the "reform" of education at Oxford, more often arrived at eminence
in public life. Two of them, who won their scholarships from Harrow at the end of the old
period, were present at the Coronation, Lord Ridley and Sir Francis Jeune.
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 257
pupils to achieve distinction in the sphere which he most
admired was not due to defects peculiar to his own method
of teaching. The intellectual flower of English boyhood,
transplanted from school to the most renowned forcing-
bed of the University of Oxford, was cultivated to
blossom too soon. Not one young brain in twenty can
retain its vigour when overstrained before maturity. The
early sacrifice of promising intellects to the excesses of the
examination system is a cause for anxiety in many lands,
and it may be the reason why the most brilliant scholars
in our old Universities are outpaced in after life, either
by men who pursued their studies intelligently, or by those
whose schooling was brief and even imperfect. It is not
the old classical education which is at fault, but the new
method of imparting it ; for, with not many exceptions, the
most powerful and successful ministers of Queen Victoria
all took high honours in classics at Oxford or at Cam-
bridge. But in the days of their youth they were not
beset on either hand by the dissimilar yet equally baneful
perils of athleticism and of brain-cramming. The supply of
statesmen to serve the Crown in the mother-country is a
matter of such moment to the Empire that in the midst of
its great festival little excuse is needed for bringing one
important phase of it to mind.
Beyond the choir the centre of the Abbey presented a
scene of great splendour, even before the arrival of the
sovereigns with their sumptuous escort. Hidden by crowded
galleries were Poets' Corner and the opposite transept, which
contains the tombs and the monuments of statesmen who
258 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
laid the foundations of the Empire while serving the pre-
decessors of the King to be crowned to-day. On the right
hand sat the temporal peers in their white-caped robes of
crimson, bearing in their hands their coronets ; on the left
were four hundred peeresses, their velvet and miniver set
off with rich embroideries. Above the peers and peeresses
were the galleries reserved for the House of Commons.
Each member, like the ambassadors and the Privy Coun-
cillors in the choir, had by his side a wife, a daughter or a
sister, men and women being in every variety of court
costume ; so the Third Estate, as represented at the Corona-
tion, had a more chequered appearance than the peerage of
the realm, which might have been symbolical of the respec-
tive functions of the two Houses, less monotonous in the
Lower than in the gorgeous Upper Chamber. Their
relative positions were reversed in Westminster Abbey, and
any one on the look out for symbolism might have observed
that the Commons, perched on their superior platforms,
crushed out of sight the peerage, except those members of
it who, by reason of their official position or exalted rank,
took part in the royal procession or were seated in the
front ranks of their order. For seeing and for being seen
the junior barons and baronesses of the United Kingdom
were less favourably placed than any of the privileged
spectators in choir, transepts and sanctuary.
Of six hundred and sixty temporal peers on Garter's
Roll, when King Edward was crowned, two hundred be-
longed to the Second Estate by right of peerages which
did not exist at the Coronation of Queen Victoria.1 Nearly
1 The exact number of temporal peers on the Roll, in addition to four princes of the blood
royal, was 655. Of these 198 were peers of creation subsequent to June 28, 1838, and there
were several others whose peerages had been called out of abeyance since that date. Of the
198 there were 165 barons, 17 viscounts, and 16 earls. In the two latter categories only those
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 259
four hundred l of these lords of ancient and modern nobility
attended in Westminster Abbey to pay homage to their
Sovereign. A large proportion of those who had attained
distinction in politics and in arms took part in the royal
procession within the Abbey and were assigned special
places outside those allotted to the various degrees of the
temporal peerage. But of those who sat among their peers
there were some who had added new credit to names and
to titles, the sound of which recalled pages of our national
history. The mere perusal of Garter's Roll, up to a certain
point, brings before the mind a moving panorama of the
annals of England. Barely a score of names upon it can
be said to have been of importance under the Angevin or
Plantagenet kings. The wars of the Roses all but extermi-
nated the nobility of Norman blood. But when the fifteenth
century is past we stand on firm genealogical ground ; and
name after name of the red-robed peers sitting in the south
transept recalls a stage in the making of the British nation,
are counted whose families did not possess any peerage of any rank prior to June 1838. The
total number of peers at the time of the Coronation of King Edward VII. (including the
Princes of the Blood, the Lords Spiritual, of whom nine were not strictly speaking Peers of
Parliament, and the temporal peers who were minors) was 694. The total number when
Queen Victoria was crowned was 593, but in Garter's Roll of June 1838 were included 16
prelates (of whom only four sat in the House of Lords) of the now disestablished Irish Church.
There were therefore 127 more Temporal Lords in 1902 than in 1838. As there were 198 on
the roll in 1902, which had been created since 1838, it follows that between the two Corona-
tions 71 peerages became extinct of those which existed before Queen Victoria was crowned.
There were, however, more than 198 created between the two Coronations, as a large number
of those created in the late reign became extinct before it ended.
1 Of the total of 694 peers on the roll, there were present at the Coronation of King Edward
382 temporal peers (in addition to four princes of the blood who were peers) and 29 spiritual
peers, including the bishops who had not taken their seats and the Bishop of Sodor and
Man, who always has a seat but never a vote in the House of Lords. There were absent
from their places 6 prelates and 273 temporal peers (17 being minors, most of whom were
present as pages or as spectators in other parts of the Abbey). Although the absentees seem
to have been much too numerous, their proportion to the total number of peers was less than at
Queen Victoria's Coronation, when of 593 on the roll, spiritual and temporal, 263 were absent.
It was, however, much more difficult to travel to the capital in 1838 than in 1902, so there
was then more excuse for peers who failed to obey the royal summons.
260 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
which at the Renaissance, freed from continental trammels,
created the English language and started on its career of
conquest of the world. The dissolution of the monasteries
launched on its prosperous course the family of the duke
in the front row, whose name recalls devotion to the cause
of liberty rewarded by power and place. The noble lord
behind him is of a line founded by one who was the wise
instrument of Elizabeth's spacious policy. Here is the
representative of a Cavalier who fell fighting for Charles I. ;
here the heir of a coronet given by Charles II. to a bold
member of the Cabal ; here the descendant of an agent of
Dutch William, ennobled for helping to evict the Stuarts.
This title dates from the rude campaign in Flanders ; that
was adorned by the polite patron of a poet whose epitaph
is yonder by the cloister - door. Here are two under-
secretaries of State, one who represents a famous dynasty
of speakers of the Lower House, and the other a renowned
occupant of the woolsack. An old sea-dog won this title off
the coast of France in the days of Louis XV. That one
was earned at the siege of an Indian city when the Com-
pany ruled in Hindustan. Here is a statesman whose great-
grandfather was Prime Minister a hundred and twenty
years ago, and the heads of whose family ever since, from
father to son, have held high office under five sovereigns —
the grandson of Lord Henry Petty, the great-grandson of
Lord Shelburne, who was twice the Viceroy of Queen
Victoria, and at the Coronation was King Edward's
principal Secretary for Foreign Affairs.
These peers, with names and titles associated with the
successive annals of England, who had assembled to do
homage to the Sovereign, personified that continuity of
national tradition which we alone of the peoples of the world
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 261
possess. It is true that the old registers of the House of
Lords, previous to the Victorian age, show that peers were
sometimes created whose names were not identified with
meritorious achievement or with historical incidents in
which they had taken a personal part. This was the
case in the eighteenth century, when Mr Pitt distributed
peerages with a lavish hand, notably at the time of the
union of Great Britain with Ireland. But, generally speak-
ing, a larger proportion of the names placed upon Garter's
Roll in the old days are associated with interesting national
events or with conspicuous public services, than of the names
ennobled in the new era. The peerages of the last two
generations of the nineteenth century, which include those
of Lord Macaulay and of Lord Beaconsfield, to speak only
of creations wrhich have become extinct, cannot be said to
have been barren in illustrious names. Yet it is possible
that future historians, scanning the roll of two hundred
peerages which came into existence in that period, will be
at a loss to attach significance to many of them. It may be
that the peerages, of which the origin will thus perplex the
historian, were the reward of acts of unobtrusive patriotism,
the secret of which the private secretaries at Downing
Street carry with them to the grave. But whatever the
origin of the abundant modern creations, the result has
not been that which might have been expected from the
introduction of so much new blood into an ancient as-
sembly. The atmosphere of the House of Lords has not
been animated thereby. To see what the vivacity of the
Upper House used to be, we need not go back as far as
the famous debates on the first Reform Bill, when the dawn
used to light up the tapestries of the old House of Lords
before the orators wearied the crowded floor and galleries.
262 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Nearly forty years later, when members who still sit on the
front benches had already been Cabinet ministers, the Irish
Church Bill was defended and attacked by the peers, in
tourneys of eloquence rarely surpassed in the records of
either House. In the twentieth century a debate on a
question of supreme importance sometimes fails to attract
to the gilded chamber a score of unofficial lords. More-
over, the peers who continue to do credit to their House,
with rare exceptions, sit there by hereditary right. One
or two law lords, one or two distinguished soldiers, or
an ex-minister promoted from the House of Commons,
usually represent in debate the newly created element in the
Upper House. It is not therefore the hereditary character
of the temporal peerage which exposes the House of Lords
to criticism ; for among the men whose forefathers were
lords in the eighteenth century or earlier, were to be found
in the last ten years of Queen Victoria's reign some of the
most eloquent statesmen and ablest administrators and
diplomatists in Parliament. This is a feature in the com-
position of the House of Lords which is gratifying to those
who approve of its hereditary basis. For if the newly
ennobled had shown themselves possessed of qualities
superior to those displayed by the peers who had inherited
their nobility, this would have furnished an argument to
reformers who, insensible to the value of tradition, would
maim our ancient constitution, which is the envy of foreign
nations, and would put in the place of our venerable Upper
Chamber a Senate potent for obstruction but incapable of
inspiring respect.
Among the more eminent lords of recent creation, we
shall find several, including some famous soldiers, in the
King's procession, while others who were ennobled for
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 263
valuable administrative services were away at their posts in
distant parts of the Empire. There were, however, a certain
number sitting with the members of their House in the
south transept, who were interesting to notice as represent-
ing certain types or classes of modern peers. Lord Goschen
was a distinguished example of a minister promoted to the
Upper Chamber for long services in the House of
Commons. He had earned his viscount's coronet by a
ministerial career which began when, " the young man from
the City," he joined Lord Palmerston's last administration,
and which ended only with the end of the century. Lord
Esher, under whose skilful direction the Abbey was deco-
rated for the Coronation, had inherited the same rank from
his father, who gained two steps in the peerage as Master of
the Rolls.1 The junior barons, seated amid the obscurity
of rafters and scaffolding, included a certain number who
had won their nobility for eminent public services. Lord
Glenesk represented the honourable traditions of journalism,
which has put the English press on a higher footing than
that of all other nations. Lord Lister retained on the roll
of the House of Peers the name, of grateful sound to suffer-
ing humanity, which perhaps is the most respected of all
English names in foreign lands. The not less illustrious
patronymic of Lord Kelvin was " interred in a title," to
use the expression of Taine, the historian, who, ignorant of
the subtleties of British nobiliary nomenclature, wondered
why his colleague of the French Institute could not have sat
1 From the time of the Stuarts to the present day the instances of the eldest sons and
heirs of law-lords attaining personal distinction have not been numerous. Lord Selborne,
who was present at the Coronation as First Lord of the Admiralty, seems to have been only
the second example of the first successor to the peerage of an ennobled judge attaining
Cabinet rank since the eighteenth century, the other having been the second Lord Ellen-
borough, the well-known Viceroy of India.
264 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
in the House of Peers as " Lord William Thomson." The
venerable form of Lord Strathcona deserved a foremost place
at the great imperial festival ; for Donald Smith, whose hair
had whitened amid the snows of Hudson Bay, had done
his share in consolidating the British Empire when, with
other loyal Canadians, he bound the Atlantic to the Pacific
with a railway line which never leaves the King's dominions.
Among the peers, both of ancient and modern creation,
there were some figures absent, owing to inevitable causes,
whose presence would have augmented the historic interest
of the scene, by affording more illustrations of the con-
tinuity of English tradition. Lord Peel, who won his
peerage in presiding over the House in which his father
won his fame, would have recalled the coronation of Queen
Victoria when we saw Sir Robert Peel at the height of
his influence. If the great age of Lord Leicester had per-
mitted him to be present, he would have formed a most
notable link with the past ; for the son of a subject of
George II., whom we noted as the senior peer at Queen
Victoria's coronation, was living when King Edward was
crowned, a hundred and fifty years after the birth of his
father, between whose first marriage and his own second
marriage was the interval of a century. If an even heavier
burden of years had not kept Lord Fortescue away from
Westminster, the peers' enclosure would have been enriched
with the presence of the oldest ex-minister of the Crown,
who was a colleague of Macaulay in Lord John Russell's
administration in I846.1
1 Lord Fortescue, who commenced his career as private secretary to Queen Victoria's first
Prime Minister, Lord Melbourne, did not attain Cabinet rank. The oldest ex-Cabinet
minister living in 1902, the Duke of Rutland, was present at the Coronation, as we shall see in
the next chapter. Lord Leicester married a second wife in 1875, his father, the first Earl,
having been married for the first time in 1775.
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 265
But the greatest figure of all the Lords of Parlia-
ment was absent, both from the benches of the peers
and from the group of nobles who escorted King Edward
to the sanctuary. Lord Salisbury was stricken down
with grievous sickness, or he would not have failed
to be in attendance on his sovereign. For the statesman
who had just laid down the office of Prime Minister was the
descendant of the other Robert Cecil who, three hundred
years before, had guided England out of one century into
another as the last adviser of a great queen and the first
minister of a new reign. The circumstances which inaugu-
rated that new reign, when the proud daughter of Henry
was succeeded by an unsympathetic Scotch cousin, bore no
analogy to those which attended the transmission of the
crown from Queen Victoria to her illustrious son. But
between the reign of Elizabeth and that of Victoria there are
significant points of resemblance. Indeed the imperial idea,
which was quickened in the Victorian age, was in some sense
an Elizabethan heritage, which had lain almost neglected
during the intervening reigns. It was thus a coincidence
appealing to the historic sense of every inheritor of our
national tradition, that one who came direct from two great
Elizabethan statesmen should have been, like the first Lord
Salisbury, the chief adviser, at the close of her days, of a
Queen in whose name the might of Britain had been
exalted beyond the seas. The lineal heirs of the Eliza-
bethan legend are not so common in public life that the
absence may not be regretted of the chief among them,
from a celebration which would have gladdened the im-
perial heart of the last of the Tudors. It may not be out
of place, in the year when the Bodleian kept its tercen-
tenary, for one bearing a name which fell into obscurity
266 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
after rising to high fame in the Elizabethan age, to remark
upon the frequency of that fate which overtook most
of the names illustrious in the statesmanship, diplomacy
and adventure of the great reign when the foundations of
the British Empire were laid. Where are the descendants
of Frobisher and of Drake, of Hawkins, of Walsingham
and of Raleigh ? The lineage of those worthies was
as honourable as that of the Cecils, their genius and
achievements were not inferior to those of the Lord High
Treasurer or of his favourite second son. Had either of
them been ennobled, as the Cecils were by Elizabeth and
James, their families might have been saved from extinc-
tion, and bearers of their names, displaying qualities of
government or of enterprise, might have illustrated them
anew in the later annals of England. The reappearance of
a Cecil at the head of affairs, at the close of the nineteenth
century, in the position in which his ancestor stood when
the sixteenth century ended, shows what a beneficial
power the historic peerage can exercise in maintaining the
continuity of English tradition.
It is said that many members of the peerage, both of
ancient and modern creation, know little and care less about
the continuity of tradition, as represented in their order. It
was perhaps this indifference which accounted for the
absence from the Abbey of peers who were detained
neither by age nor ill-health, nor other inevitable cause.
To those who are conversant with the well justified
envy which the antiquity of our Constitution rouses in
foreigners, it is incomprehensible that any noble lord, not
unavoidably detained, should have failed to be in at-
tendance on the King on that great day, unless indeed
he were a revolutionary. A coronation is the one
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 267
occasion in a reign on which the peerage is allowed to
assert its historical primacy among the subjects of the
Crown. Its prominence in the ceremonial rite, and the
homage which it alone is permitted to offer to the sovereign,
may be only symbolical usages. But ours is not the
generation to think lightly of constitutional symbolism.
When Queen Victoria was crowned many people looked
upon the coronation as a doomed anachronism which would
not survive the progress of modern ideas. Yet it survived
not only the normal evolution which was anticipated, but
the most astounding movement of progression which was
ever seen ; and the crown which the Queen assumed, for the
very reason that it was an ancient symbol, became the
instrument to turn the results of modern progress to the
profit of the British race. Englishmen have therefore no
right to despise the symbolical usages which have come
down to them from their forefathers, and least of all those
who are members of an order the existence of which is an
essential part of the constitution. In an age when, as we
have seen, the great levelling influence is wealth, it behoves
the House of Lords more than ever not to abdicate its
privileges. If the temporal peerage ever became simply
an ornamental body of titled persons, utilising their titles
for social and material profit, it would become as worthless
as one of the contemptible and irregular nobilities of the
continent. There is no second chamber in the world which
contains material as admirable as that which is found in the
House of Lords. The excellence of the work done on its
committees, the services which many of its members perform
in the local government of the country, are a proof of it.
None the less it shows a dangerous tendency to abdicate its
position as an Estate of the realm, which is seen in the
268 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
supineness of many of its members in the performance of
their constitutional duties, whether on the rare occasion of
a coronation or during the debates within its walls.
The lack of interest taken by peers in the debates of the
House of Lords is in some measure due to the one-sided
character which they have assumed of late years. At the
Coronation, as one looked at the ranks of crimson-robed
lords, all seated together on the right hand of the throne, it
seemed as though this arrangement were emblematical of the
condition of parties in the Upper House, where the Opposition
is so minute that if it came into power it would have barely
enough members to fill all the official posts of government
which are bestowed on peers. This is a state of things to
be regretted by all who have at heart the maintenance of
our ancient institutions, including that of parliamentary
government, which cannot be effective without the party
system, one being the corollary of the other. That, how-
ever, is a question which is of primary interest to the House
of Commons. The one-sidedness of the House of Lords is
a matter which chiefly concerns its own vitality. In a land
of constitutional government it is a disadvantage for any
institution to become an integral element of a political
party. The great strength of the Crown in England is
the impartial balance which it holds between the parties in
the State. From the standpoint of those who take a de-
tached view of contemporary history there is now no essential
difference in principle which divides the politicians who sit
on the right and on the left of the Speaker's chair and the
woolsack. It might therefore renew the forces of the con-
stitution if a couple of hundred peers or so would go over
to the minority, for the deliberate purpose of clearing their
House from the stagnation which menaces it. This is not
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 269
the fancy of a fantastic theorist. Foreign spectators, of
profound sagacity, who admire our institutions, have made
the same observation. We had such a one among us as
ambassador to the Court of her late Majesty, whose origin
and training made him peculiarly fit to see the defects in our
governmental machine. M. Waddington, though a most
loyal servant to France, was by blood and by education an
Englishman and one of the most British-minded statesmen
in Europe. This envoy of a land in which, unhappily,
the upper classes take no active part in politics, and are all
ranged on one side, was talking to his eminent successor on
the subject of the House of Lords, and with forcible terse-
ness he remarked : "II faut des dues des deux cotes." l
The peeresses seated on the other side of the theatre
faced the members of the House of Lords, as though they
formed the opposition. They were arranged more uni-
formly according to their degrees than were the peers,
among whom those who took part in the royal proces-
sions or who had held high political office were placed
in the front rows, whatever their rank. Nearly four
hundred peeresses graced the ceremony, or more than
double the number of those who were present at the
Coronation of Queen Victoria.2 Perhaps the ghosts of
1 Baron de Courcel, who is a not less sincere admirer of British institutions than was his pre-
decessor at Albert Gate, quoted M. Waddington's remark in an interesting memoir, which he
read before the Academic des Sciences Morales et Politiques in 1902, of the life of M.
Buffet, a fine old parliamentarian of 1848, who, when Prime Minister, after the war of 1870,
tried in vain to set up a semblance of an English constitution in France. M. de Courcel cites
with admiration the late Lord Kimberley, as a peer of essentially "conservative" type, from
the French standpoint, who belonged to the Liberal party, thus showing that no essential
difference, in the opinion of foreign observers, divided the two political camps in England.
2 At the Coronation of King Edward 385 peeresses and dowager peeresses were present out
of a total of 728 on Garter's Roll. At the Coronation of Queen Victoria 191 were present out of
a total of 497. In neither case are princesses of the blood royal counted. The proportion of
peeresses present was therefore nearly forty per cent, higher in 1902 than in 1838. Neverthe-
less, the number of absentees on August 9, 1902, amounting to 343, seemed to be too large.
2/0 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
some of the great ladies who came to the Abbey on June
28th, 1838, hovered above the ranks of their successors —
Lady Jersey, the autocrat of Almacks, or Lady Cowper,
who from the next year was to share the famous name of
Palmerston and to associate it with the last political salon
of London, or one who survived to give to the new gene-
ration a farewell reminiscence of the stately society of
England, when Maria, Marchioness of Ailesbury, sailed
into an assembly like a majestic three-decker amid a rest-
less crowd of modern steamers. If any spirits of departed
peeresses so came back, they would have remarked certain
things pointing to social changes which had taken place
since they laid aside their corruptible coronets. They
would have noticed that the peerage no longer formed a
great cousinhood, and that the change was not solely due to
the multitude of modern creations, for it was observed that
the duchesses did not all know one another, even by sight.
The times have changed since the governing society of
England was a large family circle, when the wives of all
the ministers, except perhaps the consort of the Chancellor,
whom he had married in the day of small things, called one
another by their baptismal names. Mrs Disraeli, who died
a peeress in her own right, was almost the first of the new
order of ministers' wives ; but her husband none the less
regretted the old social conditions of political life, and at
the close of his days he uttered a lament over the indefinite
extension of its boundaries,1 though he was himself the most
remarkable product and agent of the modern era. One
of the many new features of the changed state of things
is the frequency of marriages between peers of the
realm and subjects of other powers. Of the peeresses
1 Endymion, c. v., London, 1880.
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 271
present at the Coronation of Queen Victoria only three
were not of British birth, and among all the duchesses
on Garter's Roll at that period there was not a single
foreigner.1 At the Coronation of King Edward, one-
fifth of the duchesses present were of parentage not
owing allegiance to the British crown. If the peeresses
of the past looked down on their successors born within
the King's domains, they would perceive that it was not
any falling off in the traditional beauty of the woman-
hood of the British Isles which had sent noble lords to
foreign shores in search of brides. Wearing their attire of
state, as only Englishwomen can carry it, these noble
matrons, young and old, presented a picture of feminine
grace, dignity and force, which could not be matched by
the daughters of any country in the world.
VI
The House of Commons, whose galleries overshadowed
the seats of the peers and peeresses, will not occupy us so
long as at the Coronation of Queen Victoria, especially as
a number of its better-known members have been already
passed in review, sitting in the stalls allotted to Privy
Councillors of Cabinet rank. A study of the roll of the
Lower House calls forth an observation similar to that which
1 The three peeresses of foreign birth present at Queen Victoria's Coronation were the
Marchioness Wellesley, who was a sister-in-law of Jerome Bonaparte's first wife, mentioned
on p. 14 of this work ; the Countess of Pembroke, who was a Russian ; and the Countess of
Mountcashell, a Swiss. Garter's Roll also included the Countess of Tankerville, a daughter
of the Due de Gramont, whose marriage was of a type very rare in the annals of the British
peerage, which seldom made alliances with the continental nobility. There were a few
instances in the past, such as the marriage of the seventh Earl of Derby with Charlotte de
la Tre'mouille, daughter of the Due de Thouars, the noble heroine of the siege of Lathom
House. The foreign marriages contracted by modern peers are of a different character.
272 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
we made upon the register of recently ennobled peers. It
does not seem likely that sixty years hence a historian
reading the names of the members of the first House of
Commons of the twentieth century will be able to reconstitute
the scene from his knowledge of their acts and words, as is
possible from a perusal of the old lists of 1838. Yet it may
well be believed that the average capacity of members is con-
siderable : indeed Mr Gladstone asserted that it was higher
when he retired from public life than when he began his career.
But large numbers of them have devoted their ability to
pursuits more lucrative than that of politics, with the con-
sequence that, whatever the other qualities of the House of
Commons, it is the richest assembly of representatives of the
people which ever sat at Westminster since the days of Simon
de Montfort. It cannot therefore be expected that members
who have devoted their chief talents to increasing the national
wealth, and their own, should display those distinctive
political characteristics which marked the men who used
to consecrate all their intellectual powers to public affairs.
Moreover, the same abilities which lead to fortune in
commerce and in industry are not those which make good
legislators or administrators of departments of the State.
The contrary opinion is current owing to the successful
career of Mr Chamberlain. The success of that statesman is,
however, due not to the circumstances of his early manhood,
but to his remarkable personal qualities. Indeed, of all the
men of business who have held political office in England
since it was first conferred upon them forty years ago, Mr
Chamberlain is the only one who has displayed signal
superiority. Mr Gladstone's administration of 1868 was
the first in which several of them were included. The
most conspicuous was Mr Bright, who was a sublime orator,
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 273
but an inefficient administrator, though eloquence is not a
gift acquired in a counting-house, which might, however,
be thought to be a good school for a President of the Board
of Trade. The greatest Minister for War of the reign sat
in the same cabinet, and Mr Cardwell, who initiated the
reform of the Army, was a statesman of the old type, who
had taken a double-first at Oxford. The War Office which
he so ably administered is sometimes said to require the
direction of a man of business ; but when it was confided
to a practical business man, he left no distinctive marks
of his passage in the department, though he was a politician
of unusual aptitude.1
It would seem from these examples, and from others of
more recent date, which might be cited, that the commercial
and industrial notables who now fill the places formerly
occupied in the House of Commons by country gentlemen
are not likely, in spite of their undoubted intelligence, to
display the varied ability with which that class formerly
served the country. Not that they have a monopoly of
the representation of the constituencies of Great Britain.
The lawyers, for example, are never missing from a legisla-
tive assembly in any land. But we need not pause to
examine either of those two categories, as scattered in the
galleries reserved for the House of Commons were the
members of two little groups which, being characteristic
i It is misleading to quote Lord Goschen and Mr W. E. Forster as men of business who
distinguished themselves as ministers. For the training of the former, though the member of
a City firm, was not that of a business man, as only a brief interval elapsed between his leaving
Oxford and his entering Parliament ; while Mr Forster, though nominally engaged in trade,
devoted his talents to philanthropy and other public pursuits before he entered the House of
Commons in 1861. It is worthy of remark that of the numerous men of business who, in the
last twenty years of the nineteenth century, were tried as under-Secretaries and in similar
subordinate posts, only two were promoted to Cabinet rank, one of whom held a minor
Cabinet office for only a few months, and was never again included in an administration.
S
274 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
of the first parliament of Edward VII., merit our special
attention.
The youth engaged in the public life of a nation is
always interesting, and at our epoch it is such an advantage
to be esteemed young that that volatile epithet is adopted
by politicians who have attained the age at which Pitt and
Napoleon were dead and buried. Without waiting so long,
a band of really young Tory members, of the class which is
being submerged by the rising tide of plutocracy, united
themselves into a small sodality which exercised a genial
hospitality in the intervals of harassing the official leaders
of their party. Such groups are destined to early dissolu-
tion. The temptation of office detaches one member ;
marriage takes into custody another. But the experiment
was one full of promise for English politics in the reign of
King Edward. It displayed the existence of a number of
young men in parliament, neither professional politicians
looking upon it as a source of livelihood, nor rich buyers of
constituencies utilising it as a social stepping-stone. It has
more than once in these pages been remarked that a nation
of ancient tradition loses one of its chief sources of strength
when its upper class, by indolence or indifference, abdicates
its position in public affairs. The alert self-assertion of this
vivacious group, whatever its policy or its opinions, was one
of the most satisfactory features of the House of Commons
in the early days of the new reign.
At the other extremity of the political scale was another
not less interesting group, which also mustered in strength
at the Coronation of King Edward. A peculiarity of
English contemporary politics, which strikes those who
study them from a detached standpoint, is the lack of dis-
tinctive mark displayed by members of antagonistic parties.
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 275
This was not always so. In the old days, although in Eng-
land social and family relations always attenuated the bitter-
ness of political strife, a Tory, from his walk and conversa-
tion, could as clearly be distinguished from a Whig, as a
college-don from a colonel of horse. At a later period a
Manchester free-trader and a protectionist landowner seemed
to be denizens of different planets. At the present day one
may meet at a board of directors two industrial magnates
who are morally and intellectually identical. They hold the
same views on economical, social and constitutional questions ;
their religious principles, their class prejudices, and their
mental horizons coincide. Yet in the House of Commons
one sits on the right of the Speaker's chair and the other
on the left. But a new school of politicians has become
prominent in parliament, the members of which have little
in common with their colleagues on either side the House.
The forces of labour, which for many years have been
organised in opposition to the power of capital, have by
degrees obtained an important representation at West-
minster. All students of modern political systems know that
democratic suffrage has in few lands been followed by the
return to parliament in large numbers of representatives
taken from the democracy. In England the extension of the
franchise was not at once attended by many such elections.
But as time went on, the organisation of the trade-unions
began to have its effect on constituencies composed in
large proportion of the working classes. The " labour
members " thus returned differ in their social and economic
aims and ideas from the British legislator of the ordinary
type, whatever his party label. They differ not less from
the socialistic deputies, who are found on the extreme
left in the legislative assemblies of the continent. Unlike
276 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
them they eschew violent language, disorderly action and
chimerical theories. With that practical instinct which,
as we have seen, distinguishes the English working-
man from his foreign fellows, they do not allow their
settled purpose, which is to ameliorate the economic con-
ditions of labour, to be diverted by revolutionary side-
winds. The organisations which they represent have thus
become a serious force in the nation, and their influence in
parliament is not likely to decrease. The presence, there-
fore, in Westminster Abbey of the members of the most
advanced political school in Great Britain, the delegates of
hundreds of thousands of working-men beyond the bounds of
their constituencies, was a testimony both gratifying and sig-
nificant of the attitude of the British democracy to the Crown,
and of the relations of King Edward with his toiling sub-
jects, whose well-being has always been dear to his heart, as
shown by his public acts even before he ascended the throne.
A few more representative figures call for notice before
the great ceremony of the day commences. In a gallery
above the choir were placed a number of Privy Councillors
of a new type. It has become the practice to call to the
Privy Council members of the House of Commons and
other persons who have not held official posts, the title of
Right Honourable thus becoming an honorary distinction of
which the significance has changed. Among the Privy
Councillors of this class were two who were otherwise
remarkable. Sir John Dorington, from Gloucestershire,
and Sir Richard Paget, from Somerset, were both country
gentlemen who had been created baronets. Their creation
was a praiseworthy but unusual return to an ancient practice,
as recent Prime Ministers have displayed a tendency to
treat the baronetage as though it were an appendix to
WESTMINSTER ABBEY 277
Stubbs' Commercial Directory. There is, however, one
distinguished class which, both in the past and in recent
years, has dignified the scarlet badge of Ulster. " Honour
a physician," it was written over two thousand years ago,
"for of the most High cometh healing, and the King,
whose head the skill of the physician lifteth up, shall
honour him." Sir Frederick Treves was technically not a
physician ; but whatever his professional title, to no master
of the healing art were the words of the Eastern sage ever
more aptly applied than to the great surgeon whose skill
had lifted up the bowed head of the King of England so
that it might assume to-day the Imperial Crown. Other
eminent members of other professions were passed by the
King as he walked from the western door, some of the
most distinguished subjects of the realm being placed in
the nave, where the processions were the only part of the
ceremony which could be seen. Here were seated the
Knights Grand Cross of the orders of chivalry. Here in
the red mantle of the Bath were old warriors like Sir
Peter Lumsden of Afghan fame, who had served in the
Mutiny under Colin Campbell ; or peaceful veterans like Sir
Hugh Owen, of the admirable Civil Service which quietly
governs while raging politicians claim the credit. Here in
the blue of Saint Michael and Saint George was one
whose swift ships had been a mighty instrument to unite
the Empire consecrated to-day, Sir Thomas Sutherland,
who also had given the most precious pledge to patriotism
within the gift of sorrowing man. Here, in knighthood un-
adorned, was Sir Henry Irving, the chief scenic artist of his
day, who had never placed on a stage a drama which could
so move the heart, the eye, the reason and the imagination
as the great act of English history about to be performed.
CHAPTER V
THE CROWNING OF THE KING AND QUEEN
I
r I ^HE princes, the nobles, the commons of the realm, the
: delegates of the Empire beyond the seas, the envoys
of foreign powers, whom we have passed in review,
were present in Westminster Abbey only as spectators of
the Coronation. Except for the homage of the peers and
the acclamations of the whole assembly, they were to take
no part in the ceremony. We now turn to the performers
in the great national rite. They were all ecclesiastics, or
nobles and high officials of the State who assisted the clergy
as acolytes to the King, bearing the insignia of royalty to
be used as sacramental emblems, aiding the bishops in the
ceremony of inthronisation, and performing other ritual ser-
vices, in the course of the pious office.1 For the order of
Coronation is essentially an act of religious consecration, of
profound solemnity and symbolism. It is modelled on the
form for the consecration of a Bishop. This particular
character of the ceremony, which comes down to us from
Saxon times, and which is found in certain coronation ser-
vices, ancient and modern, of continental Europe, has had
1 The feudal services rendered by certain nobles to the King, during the course of the cere-
mony, form such an integral part of the religious rite that they may be considered as ritual ;
as, for instance, the presentation of the Glove by the Lord of the Manor of Worksop, which
immediately precedes the delivery of the Sceptre into the gloved hand of the Sovereign by the
Archbishop.
278
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 279
momentous results in the annals of England. On the
sacred character of the sovereign, derived from it, was
founded the claim of the King, " regere et defendere
ecclesiam," when Henry VIII. imposed upon the national
Church the royal supremacy. By it was strengthened the
theory of the divine right of Kings, the assertion of which,
by the next dynasty, changed the course of English history.
The pretension put forward by the Stuarts had its hereditary
basis fortified by what had taken place at the Reformation ;
for the Bishops were then deprived of unction at their con-
secration,1 so the King remained the sole anointed governor
of the Church, invested with sanctity and with mystical
powers, more complete even than those conferred on the
episcopal order.2
The ultimate result of the abuse of this doctrine by the
Stuarts was the enunciation by statute of the principle that
the monarchy emanated from the people. The hereditary
right of the ancient royal line was extinguished, save as
regards the descendants of the Electress Sophia, grand-
daughter of James I. Upon her line was settled "the
1 The Ordinal of 1550 was the first reformed liturgical book concerned with the consecration
of bishops, and the unction was then omitted. The last bishop consecrated previously to the
change was Robert Ferrar to St David's, on September 9, 1548. The Latin Pontifical, with the
unction, was revived during Mary's reign. John Christopherson, Bishop of Chichester, was
the last prelate so consecrated, on November 21, 1557. At the accession of Elizabeth the
English Ordinal, with no unction, came back into use. The Reverend W. H. Frere has been
kind enough to furnish me with these details at the request of the Dean of Westminster (Dr
Armitage Robinson), who had already pointed out the similarity between the ancient office
for the consecration of a bishop and the form of coronation of a king.
2 Shakespeare expresses the idea prevalent in England after the Reformation as to the
peculiarly sacred character conveyed to the sovereign by his " enunction," in King Richard II,
(Act III. Sc. II.), which was written on the eve of the succession of the Stuarts, between 1593
and 1596 : —
" Not all the water in the rough, rude sea
Can wash the balm from an anointed king ;
The breath of worldly men cannot depose
The deputy elected by the Lord."
28o THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
crown and imperial dignity of the realm " l — words, the
full future significance of which was not understood by the
framers of the famous statute, to which we owe the Hano-
verian succession. Under that Act the prerogatives of the
crown were left, in the main, the same as under the Tudors
and the Stuarts : 2 it remained the fountain of law and of
justice. But parliament having deposed the elder branch
of the descendants of Henry VII., who held that the
primary basis of their divine right was heredity and that
it was therefore not created but only consecrated by
unction, there was fortunately no need to modify the
mystical character of the ancient form and order of
Coronation.3 Indeed it was kept intact, for the purpose
of showing that the old hereditary monarchy of England
had not been interrupted, though the succession had been
diverted and though it had been reconstituted on a new
statutory basis. Thus the venerable rite was conserved
through the long period in which the constitutional ideas
of Erastian whiggism prevailed. Modifications were made
in it, but they were generally accidental. The solemn
ecclesiastical character of the ceremony, in its three impor-
tant parts of "consecration, enunction and coronation," was
preserved until a day when the symbolism of the rite had
acquired a new significance to a people which had woke up
1 Act of Settlement, 12 and 13 Will. III. c. 2.
8 Hallam, Constitutional History, c. xv.
3 Alterations were made in the service at the coronation of William and Mary, but not by
reason of the changed basis of the succession. They were made because James II., on account
of his religious opinions, had mutilated the service used when James I. , Charles I. and Charles
II. were crowned. Changes having been thus made, the original English form, first used in
1603, was never entirely restored. Macaulay mentions the omissions insisted on by James II.
in c. iv. of his History of England, to which Evelyn in his Diary also refcrs. The important
changes made in the rite of 1689, — the new form of Coronation Oath, the presentation of the
Bible, etc., were made with a view of guarding the Protestantism of the succession ; but the
mystical character of the consecration remained untouched.
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 281
to the advantage of possessing a hereditary monarchy of
uninterrupted tradition. In 1902 the statutory basis of the
monarchy was of little popular importance. That the
sovereign power had been conferred by parliament had
become a matter of indifference to the nation, whose love
for the monarchy had grown more profound than for its
parliamentary institutions. The monarchy now emanated
from the people in a sense never anticipated by the con-
stitutionalists who made the Revolution of 1688 or who
drew up the Act of Settlement. It had added a new mean-
ing to the word " imperial," which those parliamentarians
had used in their dynastic statute, borrowing it from Tudor
times, at the end of which it had found a place in the
ancient coronation ritual. That venerable rite, studded
with imperial phrases, which for long generations had had
more sonority than significance, now assumed a new sym-
bolism. It was now to be used as the solemn consecration of
the British Empire in the person of the sovereign, who was
to receive the imperial crown at the hands of the ministers
of the national Church, with ceremonial, much of which had
been performed within these same Abbey walls during half
the Christian era.
II
Those of the Spiritual Lords who were not assigned special
functions in the Coronation did not proceed to the western
door of the Abbey, with the regalia, to attend the sovereigns,
but waited in the sanctuary, attired not in copes, like the
officiating clergy, but in their convocation robes of scarlet.
Among the prelates thus seated between the pulpit and the
altar there were several who represented various episcopal
types in the Anglican Church at the beginning of the
282 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
twentieth century. The Bishop of Gloucester, Dr Ellicott,
was the father of the English hierarchy and the last sur-
vivor of the bishops named when Lord Shaftesbury was
the occult Minister of Public Worship. The junior bishop,
Dr Charles Gore, was of a school which did not exist in
the episcopacy of Palmerstonian days : a Balliol scholar
like Manning and Matthew Arnold, who combined the
ascetic piety of the one with the bold liberalism of the
other. Dr Talbot, titular of once rural Rochester, but
actually missionary-bishop of the poor of South London,
was another Liberal high-churchman, and as first warden
of Keble College had given prosperity to that experimental
seminary. The Bishop of Hereford had also been the
head of a House at Oxford ; but Dr Perceval, whose varied
talents also shone in parliamentary debate, was most famed
as a schoolmaster who so loved his craft that he gave up
the ease of his college presidency to go back as head-
master to Rugby, where he had previously served under
Temple, the chief celebrant of to-day's ceremony. Bishop
Owen, of Saint David's, was a Welsh-speaking Welshman,
more likely to win Wales from his native dissent than
prelates of the type of his predecessor at the last corona-
tion, Bankes Jenkinson, cousin of the Prime Minister, Lord
Liverpool, who rarely saw his diocese, being also Dean
of Durham. Among others in this group were Bishop
Boyd- Carpenter of Ripon, the most eloquent voice of the
English episcopate ; and the Bishop of Lichfield, who, with
his nephew, Lord Dartmouth, Lord- Lieutenant of Stafford-
shire, were two kinsmen at the head of Church and State
in that populous county. The most striking figure among
these red-robed prelates was not a member of the English
bench. Dr Alexander, Primate of All Ireland, was the
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 283
last relic of the lords of parliament of the Irish Church,
who " beckoned unto their partners, which were in the
other ship, that they should come and help them." The
brilliant Magee was rewarded with an English mitre for
his wit in applying that text to the situation of the sister
Churches in 1868; and it is a pity that no Prime Minister
ever called back to the House of Peers the venerable poet
and orator, who might have woke up the gilded chamber
with his eloquence. In the rear of the bishops, behind the
Plantagenet tomb of Edmund Crouchback, sat Mr Abbey,
making studies for his painting of the historic scene. We
may deplore, as members of the human race, that civilisa-
tion in the United States has taken such a form as to leave
little room in that prosperous nation for its sons of artistic
genius ; but as Englishmen we may rejoice that they find a
congenial refuge in the land of their forefathers.
Meanwhile the King and the Queen had proceeded to
Westminster from Buckingham Palace amid the acclama-
tions of their people, through the Mall, beneath the Horse
Guards' Arch, past Whitehall and down Parliament Street.
The gilded coach which bore them, drawn by its cream-
coloured team of eight, had never, since it was built for the
coronation of George III., seen those historic thorough-
fares filled with a like multitude, never had it formed the
central object of such a procession. For the roads were
lined by defenders of the Empire from the King's distant
domains, whose power in the warfare of the future is not
yet fully known ; while amid his escort of brilliant horsemen,
composed of naval as well as military officers, of imperial
yeomanry and household brigade, of volunteers and princes,
most conspicuous were the mounted troops from the Colonies
and the native cavalry from India, riding with admirable
284 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
grace in advance of their sovereign. When the procession
reached the Abbey the maharajahs, whose noble presence
on horseback, in the jewelled splendour of their Oriental
attire, had profoundly impressed the crowd, passed at once
to their stalls in the choir, where we have seen them. The
Duke of Connaught, who had ridden by the side of the
state-coach, in supreme command of the military pageant,
was likewise conducted to his seat, in front of the peers,
next the Prince of Wales. The entry of the youngest
field-marshal, followed by Prince Charles of Denmark, the
King's handsome son-in-law, and the other princes who
rode in the procession, told the expectant assembly that the
Sovereign and his consort had arrived at the western door.
When the procession within was ready to advance, the
King and the Queen came forth from their retiring-rooms,
whither they had withdrawn, and moved with it, through
the vestibule, to the entrance of the Abbey. As they
reached the threshold all the vast audience arose in nave,
choir, transepts and galleries, while from above the screen
ascended the strains of the psalm, " I was glad when they
said unto me," in accordance with the ancient rubric, first
written in English three hundred years before.1 By a usage,
also of antiquity, the scholars of Saint Peter's College,
Westminster, placed high in the triforium, greeted first the
Queen and then the King, as they severally approached, with
cries of Vivat regina Alexandra : Vivat rex Edwardus. The
Latin salutation was interwoven with the joyous music of Sir
Hubert Parry's anthem, so the clangorous voices of grow-
ing youth were mingled with the angelic tones of the
choristers. They recalled the fine traditions of Westminster
school associated with centuries of the history of the Abbey
1 The Coronation Order of King James the First.
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 285
and of England : the winter's morning when the steadfast
Busby read to the boys the prayer for their sovereign lord
King Charles, an hour before the tragedy that took place
a few yards away "in the open street before Whitehall";
or the day, twelve springs later, when the loyal headmaster,
who was to take the scholars to yet two more coronations
most different in character, bore the holy oil for the anoint-
ing of the son of the royal martyr ; or, nearer our own time,
they brought to mind the heroes who had gone forth from
the old precinct to lead the soldiers of England, with such
success that Westminsters who had served with Wellington
declared him incapable of having given to Etonian officers
the credit for Waterloo.1 The school, a victim to the
growth of London, is no longer the rival of Eton. But its
ancient customs are sacred ; and just as its annual Latin
play in the dormitory is an admirable legacy of the age of
the great Queen who wrote her despatches in that tongue,
so were the vivats of the Westminsters the sole relic at the
Coronation of King Edward of the Latin service used for
the last time when Elizabeth was crowned.2
1 Lord William Lennox, an old Westminster, as were most of the members of the
Richmond family for several generations, who was on Wellington's staff at Waterloo, and
who danced at his mother's ball at Brussels three nights before, told me in my boyhood that
the Duke, whatever his love for his own old school, could never have stated that Waterloo was
won on the playing-fields of Eton, because that legendary saying was out of keeping with his
constant recognition of the services of Westminsters, both in 1815 and in the Peninsula.
Three of his lieutenants at Waterloo, who became Field-Marshals, Lords Anglesey, Raglan
and Strafford— to give them their subsequent titles— were old Westminsters, as was Lord
Combermere of Peninsular fame, to say nothing of a long list of general officers, who won
their distinction in those two campaigns. It may be noted that the Westminster boys
exercised another ancient privilege when, after the Coronation, they gave three cheers for the
King as he walked to the west door, which were called for by the headmaster, Dr Gow, in
accordance with old custom.
2 From the coronation of Edward II. to that of Elizabeth the sovereigns were crowned with
the same Latin service, which Dr Wickham Legg calls '' the fourth recension " of the English
Coronation Order. At the coronation of James I. an English version of that Latin form was
used for the first time with certain additions, such as the use of the English Communion Service.
286 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
No statelier pageant was ever seen in England than the
proceeding of Their Majesties from the west door of the
Abbey into the choir. The postponement of the Coronation
had given time for the procession to be organised with a per-
fection of detail rarely achieved in an English spectacle, so
that nothing marred the impressive beauty of the scene. The
setting in which it was placed could not be matched in any
land. The grey vault of the lofty roof, beyond the reach
of decoration, told of the antiquity of the rite, which, more
ancient than it, had been solemnised beneath it, for each
new reign, ever since it arose in the Middle Ages. The
tiers of spectators, their apparel of state hiding the walls
with a mass of variegated hue, presented a picture not only
gladdening to the eye of the artist, but appealing to the
pride of the patriot who saw what elements composed the
banks of rich colouring between which the regal procession
passed. The procession itself, a vision of unsurpassed
splendour and dignity, was no mere parade of imposing
costume and glittering insignia. Each person who moved
in it had, by his office, by his name, or by the emblems
which he bore, a distinct historical significance in our annals
of a thousand years. As it slowly defiled, to the jubilant
sounds of music and singing, it offered, to those who looked
on, an emblazoned lesson in the continuity of our national
tradition, shared to-day with the Empire beyond the seas,
which had sent its sons for the first time in the history
of the Imperial Crown to see it assumed by the British
sovereign. On him and on his gracious consort all eyes were
turned. The Queen came first, wearing the flower of youth,
which a nation's love had made perpetual, since the far-off
day when a bride she brought it to adorn our shores — rosa
deplantata semper juvenescit. Then preceded by the ancient
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 287
regalia of the realm, invested with a new symbolism on this
great day, advanced the central figure in the royal pageant.
His subjects from five quarters of the globe marvelled to see
with \vhat supreme ease the King, so lately stricken down,
wore his weighty robes of crimson, with what resolute, regal
bearing he trod the nave and choir on his way to receive
the crown, the sceptre and the orb, for the first time to be
recognised as the insignia of world-wide empire.
The picturesque details of the procession must not detain
us — the tabards of the heralds, the embroidered copes of
the prelates and the prebends,1 the blue mantles of the
Knights of the Garter, the scarlet cloaks of the Barons of
the Cinque Ports.2 We will turn to some of those taking
part in it, to complete our review of the principal persons
who assisted, actively or passively, at the Coronation of the
1 In the first English version of the Coronation service (1603) the members of the
capitular body are called Prebends, not Prebendaries, and this use is found in the revised
Form and Order for the Coronation of William and Mary. The former term is now applied
more usually, and, as Dr Murray is kind enough to point out to me, more in accordance with
etymological analogy, to the stipend than to the titulary. Similarly in French, as far back as
the thirteenth century, pribcndc signifies the revenue attached to the office of a canon. There
are two French derivatives from this word — prtbendt meaning chanoine a prtbende and prf-
bendier, an ecclesiastic who takes part in certain capitular ceremonies au dessous deschanoincs.
The latter would seem to correspond in some degree with the use of the term " prebendary"
in English cathedral establishments, the prebendaries being members of the "Greater Chapter "
in cathedrals where such a body exists, in distinction to the members of the chapter referred
to in s. 93 of 3 and 4 Viet. cap. 113, which says that "the term Canon shall be construed to
mean only every residentiary member of the Chapter except the Dean." But the resident
members of the Chapter of Westminster are called not Canons, but Prebends or Prebendaries
in the successive English versions of the Coronation service. They are likewise classed as
" Prebendaries " in the Earl Marshal's account of the ceremony of 1902 (see Appendix I.), but
there the modern usage of applying the term Canon to their names as a prefix is also adopted.
It would be an affectation not to follow this usage, though it is a modern barbarism which the
Chapter of Christ Church alone repudiates. No one ever spoke of " Canon Pusey," and in an
earlier generation at Saint Paul's "Canon Sydney Smith" would have had an unfamiliar
sound.
2 The Barons of the Cinque Ports, since the Coronation of Henry IV., have established
their claim to carry a canopy of cloth of gold over the sovereign in the procession. In
a statement prepared by Mr Inderwick, K.C., a Baron of the Cinque Ports, and Sir
Wollaston Knocker, C.B., their Solicitor, it was said that such canopies had been borne by
the Barons at forty-one Coronations since the Norman Conquest. The Court of Claims
288 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
King. It will not be possible to name them all ; but, as
with the spectators so with the officiants, it will be better to
single out a few of the more characteristic figures for special
notice than to set down a long and naked list. It will be
more convenient not to mention them in the order in which
they proceeded to the sanctuary, but to take the clergy first,
and then the great officers of State and nobles performing
special functions or services in the ceremony.
The procession was led by the King's chaplains, who
were not vested in the copes which were assigned to them
at the coronations of the early Stuarts. Conspicuous among
them was Dr Ainger, the worthy successor of a long line
of learned masters of the Temple, from Sherlock to Vaughan.
At their rear walked the Registrar of the Order of the
Garter, Dean Eliot, and Canon Hervey, the spiritual pastors
of the sovereigns, amid, respectively, the formal state of
Windsor Castle, and the domestic home-life of Sandringham.
Then came the capitular body of the Abbey, the custodians
of the regalia during the period of the Coronation and the
assistants of the Primate at the crowning of the King, in
virtue of the ancient rights of the Abbot and prebends of
Westminster. It also appertained to the Abbot, who re-
tained his old title for several reigns after the Reformation,1
for the Coronation of Edward VII. ruled that if His Majesty decided that a canopy should
be used, the Barons of the Cinque Ports should carry it. No canopy was used,
but fourteen Barons with four other officials of the Cinque Ports were present by the
King's command, and to them were delivered the standards of the Three Kingdoms by the
standard-bearers at the entrance to the choir. The standard-bearers were for England Mr
Dymoke, the descendant of the Champion whose functions have fallen into desuetude ; for
Scotland Mr Scrymgeour Wedderburn, who sustained his claim as hereditary standard-bearer
for Scotland ; and for Ireland The O'Conor Don, the head of the most ancient family of
Connaught ; while the Duke of Wellington bore the Union Standard.
i In the English version of the Coronation Order of James I. the head of the Chapter is
called the Abbot. In the Liber Regalis of that time he is "Abbas sive Decanus West-
monaster," and this alternative form is found in the English Coronation order of Charles I.,
where he is called " the Abbot or Deane of Westminster."
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 289
" to remember his Majesty " of the observances he had to
fulfil. This duty the aged Dean was too infirm to perform at
the end of his long guardianship of the Abbey, during
which he had taken pious care of the fabric. Like many
of the ecclesiastics assisting at the Coronation, he was
an old schoolmaster, and, though he rose to one of the
most desirable dignities in the Church, he had not taken
orders till advanced in his career, when he left Rugby
to become headmaster of Marl borough. By reason of
Dr Bradley 's infirmity most of his functions at the
Coronation devolved on the senior of the Canons, sub-
Dean Duckworth, whose name is always associated
with the early training of the lamented Prince Leopold.
Next in seniority came Archdeacon Wilberforce, who,
with his brother the Bishop of Chichester sitting among
the Spiritual Lords, illustrated in the third successive
generation a great name, — a rare achievement in the history
of eminent families. The other wearers of the prebendal
copes were Canon Armitage Robinson, whom Westminster
had taken from Cambridge, and who was soon with his
patristic learning to dignify the stall of the Abbots ;
Bishop Welldon, another schoolmaster, who from Eton
went to rule Harrow before his brief episcopal reign by
the Hoogly ; and Canon Hensley Henson, whose tolerant
spirit was a fitting ornament to the chapter of the minster
which is the religious centre of an Empire of a hundred
creeds. The prelates who supported the Queen, in her
progress from the west door, were the diocesans of
Sandringham and of Windsor, Bishop Sheepshanks of
Norwich, garbed in a Russian cope, and Bishop Paget
of Oxford, wearing over his vestment the insignia of the
Chancellor of the Order of the Garter. The latter not
290 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
having succeeded to a seat in the House of Lords, for the
first time in the history of the First Estate it happened that
a bishop not being a lord of parliament took a ceremonial
part in a coronation.1 The Bishop of Norwich had evan-
gelised the uttermost regions of the British Empire ; but
Oxford had claimed nearly the whole career of the successor
of Liddell at Christchurch and of Stubbs at Cuddesdon.
The bishops in attendance on the King were titulars of
sees associated by long tradition with services rendered to
sovereigns at their coronations. Immediately in front of
the King the Bible was borne by the Bishop of London,
Dr Winnington- Ingram, who at an early age had been set
over the chief suffragan diocese of the southern province
by reason of his devoted labours, as an assistant bishop, in
the outcast quarters of the metropolis. At his right the
chalice was carried by Bishop Davidson of Winchester, the
intimate counsellor of Queen Victoria, already designated by
opinion to be the next primate, and thus to follow doubly
the example of his father-in-law Tait. The Bishop of Ely,
Lord Alwyne Compton, the High Almoner, was chosen by
the King to bear the patina. The Bishops of Durham and
of Bath and Wells supported the sovereign, on the right
hand and the left, in virtue of a right enjoyed by the occupants
of those sees at every coronation on record since that of
Richard I., except when forfeited by special circumstances.
Dr Handley Moule was the third of a trio of ripe scholars
whom Cambridge had sent to Durham, being the successor
1 At previous coronations, before the creation of additional bishoprics (under 10 and 1 1 Viet.
c. 108), every English and Welsh bishop became a Lord of Parliament immediately after con-
secration and homage. But there were bishops who did homage at coronations who had not
seats in the House of Lords. Between the Union and the disestablishment of the Irish Church
only four of the sixteen Irish archbishops and bishops sat in the House of Lords, though they
were all included in Garter's Roll. Thus the Bishop of Cork was present at Queen Victoria's
Coronation, though he was not one of the representative spiritual peers of Ireland.
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 291
of Lightfoot and Westcott, who had given a new renown to
the palatine diocese. To Dr Kennion was confided the
duty of instructing the King throughout the ceremony.
Thus a former bishop of the colonial Church took a fore-
most part in the great imperial festival, by the hazard of a
tradition attached to the ancient see of Bath and Wells, six
hundred years before the diocese of Adelaide was discovered.
The Archbishop of York, by the pleasure of the sove-
reign, though not of proven right, was appointed to crown
the Queen-Consort. Dr Maclagan, like Saint Francis of
Assisi and other holy men, was a soldier until he dis-
covered his vocation, which he vindicated as a parish priest
before succeeding, at Lichfield, George Augustus Selwyn,
who, as Bishop of New Zealand, had been an early apostle
of the imperial idea. The father of the Archbishop of
Canterbury had served the Empire, beyond the seas, in a
less favourable climate, having been governor of Sierra
Leone, and he himself was born in an Ionian isle when it
was a colonial protectorate of Great Britain. As the aged
Primate tottered through nave and choir, under the weight
of his vestments, his thoughts must have gone back to
another consecration in which he took a chief part in the
same place nearly thirty-three years before. In the
vicissitudes of human life there was rarely a greater con-
trast than between the circumstances of the two days on
which Frederick Temple made his first and last appearance
as a bishop in the Abbey of Westminster. On a dark
December morning, in the sombre church, dimly lit by
candles, he was consecrated for the work and ministry of a
bishop in face of the protests of nearly half his fellow-
suffragans of the province of Canterbury, for doctrinal
reasons which, for once, united Evangelicals and Ritualists
292 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
in their objection to his admission to the pastoral office.
In the same Abbey, glittering with seven thousand brilliant
uniforms and robes of state, on Coronation-day, the old Arch-
bishop, his failing strength fortified by the sympathy and de-
votion of the whole hierarchy of England, moved, a venerated
figure in the royal procession, to the sanctuary, to perform
a more solemn act of consecration than that which he had
received on the same spot by the imposition of hands.
In advance of the Archbishops marched an interesting
group of laymen, headed by the four Knights of the Garter
appointed to hold the canopy over the King's head during
the anointing. The junior of the knights was the senior of
the peers, Lord Derby, a former Viceroy of Canada, and
the head of the house which perhaps has the most dis-
tinguished record of all English political families. The
prominence of the Stanleys in the state for five hundred
years is seen by the fact that twelve times since the corona-
tion of Henry V. have they worn the Garter. In the
reign of Queen Victoria no family displayed more various
talent in the public service than the fourteenth Earl, her
Prime Minister, and his two dissimilar sons, who both sat
in her Cabinet Councils. Lord Spencer, who walked by
Lord Derby, was the senior member of the order, not
of royal blood. He was also the last survivor of the
Whigs as an active force in politics, since the death of that
not sufficiently estimated statesman, Lord Kimberley.
The nephew of Lord Althorp, who had been twice a
Viceroy, and had sat in three Cabinets, displayed in his
person the urbanity of English political life inherited from
a departed age of parliamentary tradition. In front of him
was Lord Rosebery, who until the month before the
Coronation enjoyed the distinction of being the only ex-
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 293
Prime Minister of England. It was not that distinction,
but his gift of eloquence which made him the most im-
portant member of the House of Lords, where his followers
were as few as his admirers were numerous in the country.
The fourth of the blue-mantled knights was Lord Cadogan,
who, like Lord Spencer, had been Viceroy of Ireland, and
who, as the tenant-for-life of a great district of London,
represented a new class of landed interest which has
increased in importance since Queen Victoria was crowned.
Near this group were a number of members of the Govern-
ment, who attended the King in virtue of their high offices.
The Lord Steward was Lord Pembroke, with features
resembling those of his father, Sidney Herbert, whom we
saw at the coronation in 1838. The Lord President was
the Duke of Devonshire, born and trained to be the leader
of the Liberal party, and thus perhaps the chief victim of its
disruption, of which he was also a chief instrument. The
Chancellor of 1902 was Lord Halsbury, who resembled the
Chancellor of 1802 in the tenacity of his custody of the
Great Seal, though the years that he had sat on the wool-
sack did not yet equal those of Eldon.
A French witness of the Coronation, in his mind's eye, saw
Mr Balfour seated in the Abbey on the ministerial bench.
France is so eaten up by its imported parliamentary system
that it could not occur to a Frenchman that in the home of the
mother of parliaments no prominent part in a national
ceremony was assigned to ministers in their administrative
capacity. Still less could he comprehend that the Prime
Minister of the United Kingdom is a personage unknown
to the law, constitutional or ceremonial, for whom con-
sequently no place is reserved at royal or national festivals,
and that Mr Balfour, at the Coronation, walked in the pro-
294 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
cession with the Archbishops, the Chancellors of Great
Britain and of Ireland, and the Lord President of the Privy
Council, only by right of his tenure of the ancient office of
Lord Keeper of the King's Privy Seal.1 Public opinion
was too prone to look upon the succession of Mr Balfour
to Lord Salisbury as a dynastic arrangement, based on the
historical precedent of three hundred years before, when a
Cecil succeeded a Cecil as chief counsellor of the crown.
But Mr Balfour possessed a stronger title to high place
than his descent, on the distaff side, from Lord Burleigh.
Like the two last Liberal Prime Ministers, like the leader of
the Liberal opposition, he was of the assiduous race whose
fathers dwelt beyond the Tweed. A Scotsman of intelli-
gence, though he knows well how to utilise the advantages
of birth or connection, needs not this aid to rise to the
foremost dignities in the British Empire, even to those
which would seem to be essentially reserved for English-
men, such as the two primatial mitres of the Church of
England. But it is chiefly in the Empire beyond the seas
that the enterprising qualities of the Scotch are conspicuous
and irresistible. Nurtured in a land of climate so rude that
those who survive it are robust enough to conquer the world,
they are the most efficient Empire-builders of all the subjects
of the British Crown, from which they have derived power
and prosperity. It was therefore not inappropriate that, at the
great imperial festival, the first minister of the Crown should
1 The high precedence of the Lord Keeper was confirmed by 31 Henry VIII. c. 10. Sixty-
three years later in the Coronation procession of James I. from the Tower, the following
precedence was given to the great officers of state who rode in it : " Lord Chancellour, Lord
Great Master, Lord Keeper of the Privie Seall, Lord Admirall, Secretarie of State, Almoner,
Treasurer of the house, Coumtroller of the house," after whom came the " Dukes, Marquesas,
Dukes' eldest sonns," etc. It does not seem clear if, in matter of precedence, the event of the
Privy Seal being held by a commoner is provided for. It is to be noted that the Secretary of
State w.is given a very high place in the procession of James I., although at present that office,
unlike several other posts, does not affect the precedence of a peer above baronial rank.
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 295
have been a North Briton, of the race which has forged
some of the sturdiest links in the chains which bind the
Colonies to the mother-country.1
In the part of the procession between the King and the
Queen were several other eminent Scotsmen, including the
only two subjects of the Crown who had attained the signal
honour of marrying princesses of the royal house, both being
Highland chieftains. The Duke of Fife, as Lord High
Constable of England, walked, by ancient precedent, abreast
with the Earl Marshal and near the King. Further in
advance, at the head of the Regalia, the sceptre with the
cross was borne by the Duke of Argyll, whose great name
and title filled the most dramatic pages of Anglo-Scottish
history in the latter half of the Stuart regime. Of Ireland,
the Lord High Constable was the Duke of Abercorn, the
chief of the line of Hamilton, which was not less Scotch than
that of Campbell. From Ireland, too, came a most notable
figure in the procession, Lord Roberts, carrying the Sword
of Spiritual Justice. As the old Field-marshal moved along,
covered with honours, earned in fifty years of fighting for
the Empire, one wondered if he would not exchange them
all to recall one gallant young life which perished nobly in
his last campaign. By the side of the Commander-in-Chief
the pointless Sword of Mercy was borne by the Duke of
Grafton, a general officer and great-grandson of the Prime
Minister, whose treatment by Junius was neither pointless
nor merciful. The third of the naked swords carried before
1 The elevation to the peerage of eminent colonists has been initiated as a means of
strengthening the bonds of the British Empire : and it is worthy of remark that the three
coronets which were worn on colonial heads, at the Coronation of King Edward VII.,
had been all earned by Scotsmen. No other peerages had been bestowed on colonists
than the baronies of Mount Stephen, Strathcona and Macdonald of Earnscliffe — the last having
been conferred on the widow of that remarkable statesman Sir John Macdonald, who would
have rejoiced in the imperial significance of the Coronation.
296 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
the King was in the hands of another Field-marshal, Lord
Wolseley, who, before reaching the supreme command,
which he held before Lord Roberts, had fought for the
extension of the imperial sway of England in every quarter
of the globe, from Burma to the Red River and from Egypt
to the Cape.
Divided from these warriors by the blazoned tabards of
a line of heralds was an ornate cluster of high officials and
nobles, who by long tradition walked in front of the
sovereign. Here was the Lord Mayor of London exercis-
ing the ancient privilege of bearing the City Mace in this
place of honour. Here was the Lord Great Chamberlain,
whose hereditary function of fastening the clasps of the
King's imperial mantle had been assigned to Lord
Cholmohdeley. Nearer the sovereign, the Sword of State
in its scabbard was borne by Lord Londonderry, the grand--
nephew of Castlereagh, and the honour of bearing the
most significant symbol on this great day fell to the
Duke of Marlborough, who carried the Imperial Crown.1
In this group, surrounding the King, were two other
dukes, the antiquity and splendour of whose names
made them, in a historical sense, two of the most
interesting figures in the pageant. The Dukes of Nor-
folk and of Somerset were, at the Coronation of King
Edward VII., as their ancestors had been when Queen
Elizabeth was crowned, at the head of the temporal peer-
age. Indeed, in her reign they were the sole members of
the ducal order, which had otherwise become extinct, and
even their titles were under attainder. The descendant of
1 St Edward's Crown, which, according to the official accounts of the procession, was borne
by the Duke of Marlborough, was not taken to the West Door, but was left by sub- Dean
Duckworth on the altar whence he bore the Imperial Crown through the Abbey and
delivered it to the Duke of Marlborough. See chapter vi. , p. 322.
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 297
the Protector Somerset, towering above his peers, carried
the Orb, the emblem of world-wide sovereignty, which, since
his grandfather bore it before Queen Victoria, had acquired
a new significance. The chief of the house of Howard
held the baton of the Earl Marshal, which his ancestor had
received with the dukedom of Norfolk amid the wars of
the Roses, nine years after the first book had been printed
in England, here in the precinct of Westminster Abbey.
The record of state ceremonials which successive Dukes
of Norfolk have superintended, since their ordering was
assigned to the first Earl Marshal, is the dynastic history of
England since the Renaissance. On the occasion of the
Coronation of King Edward, the details of the ceremony
were regulated by the Earl Marshal with a precision which
could not have been attained without his devoted application
to the labours of his venerable office, at a season when, but
for his sense of public duty, he would have preferred to be in
retirement. For another cause the performance by the Earl
Marshal of his ancient functions called forth the admira-
tion of foreign spectators of the Coronation. Happy is the
nation, they said, in which such a spirit of tolerance reigns
that to one of the most conspicuous Roman Catholics in
Europe could be confided the supervision of a national
religious rite, celebrated by the prelates of another Church.
Behind the King, the rear of the procession was brought
up by a brilliant company of men of war and of courtiers,
in which was seen the engaging person of Admiral Sir
Edward Seymour, supported on his left by Sir Alfred
Gaselee, his military colleague in the Chinese expedition, and
on his right by Lord Kitchener, the avenger of Gordon on
the Nile and the pacificator of South Africa. Finally
came the members of the King's household, who had
298 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
devoted their careers to his personal service before he
mounted the throne. Most of them were soldiers: Sir
Dighton Probyn, who won the Victoria Cross in India the
year after it was founded ; Sir Arthur Ellis, who at eigh-
teen was in the trenches before Sebastopol ; and Sir
Stanley Clarke, once a gallant Light Dragoon and closely
allied with the Empire beyond the seas. One civilian
walked with this group, the Private Secretary to the King,
Lord Knollys, who after long services, of importance to the
nation as well as to the royal house, took back to the
House of Lords a name so ancient that it lingers in France
a reminiscence of the time when another Edward of
England, the Black Prince, was master of Guyenne and
Aquitaine.
Ill
The scene within the sanctuary, when the King and Queen
had arrived there, was one of surpassing magnificence,
worthy of the culminating act in the great national drama.
To spare the King needless fatigue, the sovereigns
passed at once to seats near the old Coronation Chair,
instead of remaining for the first part of the ceremony in
the centre of the "theatre," by the thrones, beneath the
lantern of the Abbey. The sanctuary thus became at once
an animated picture of infinite variety and dignity. The
north side was lined with the scarlet-robed bishops who
took no part in the ceremony. On the south side the
Princess of Wales and her children, with the daughters of
the King and other ladies of the royal house, from a
sumptuous tribune, looked upon the fair spectacle. At the
East the noblemen bearing the regalia delivered it to the
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 299
sub- Dean to be placed upon the altar in glittering array.
They in their robes of crimson and ermine, with other
members of the procession, whose places were within the
sanctuary, mingled with the officiating prelates and the
prebendaries, vested in their muki-coloured copes. Near
the centre stood King Edward's Chair, made for the first
of his name to hold the Coronation Stone which, captured
from the Scots, he sent to Westminster six hundred years
ago. Below, between the transepts, was a clear space
around the thrones. But beyond and on all sides, from the
floor to the tall roof, there were massed the serried ranks
of spectators, like rainbow beds of flowers, who presently
sprang into life with a loud shout of " God Save King
Edward!" when the aged Archbishop demanded of them
the recognition of the Undoubted King of the Realm.
Then after the trumpets had sounded and the calm voices
of two bishops had been heard reading epistle and
gospel, the King placed on his head his cap of crimson
velvet, which he had removed during his private devotions,
and, the sermon having been suppressed, he prepared to
take the oath. In clear tones which rang through the
minster the King made his covenant with the people, which
in bygone days when sovereign and subjects were not, as
now, of one heart,1 was the cause of sore controversy
between them. After the Veni, Creator had been sung,
as at the consecration of a bishop, the strains arose of
1 In the final breach between Charles I. and the Parliament in 1642 the right construction
of the Coronation Oath was brought into frequent discussion. The words in the old Latin
form were, "Concedis justas leges . . . quas vulgus elegerit." The English oath which
Charles I. took (as did his father James I.) ran, "Sir will you graunt to hold and keep the
Lawes and rightfull Customes, which the Commonaltie of your Kingdome have." It was
maintained by one side that elegerit should be construed in the future perfect, while the other
contended for the perfect subjunctive. The controversy is mentioned by Hallam (following
Clarendon) in his History of England, c. i.x. The oath as at present used is given in
Appendix II.
300 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Handel's Coronation Anthem, " Zadok the priest and
Nathan the prophet anointed Solomon King-," words
which are said to have been chanted in this place, at
coronations, for a thousand years. In the meantime the
King was disrobed of his crimson robes by the Lord
Great Chamberlain. Then seated on the ancient chair,
beneath the pall held by the Knights of the Garter,
whom we saw in the procession, he was anointed on the
head, on the breast and on the hands, by the Archbishop
with the holy oil, poured into a spoon, by the sub-
Dean, from the golden Ampulla shaped as an eagle,
which was all that was saved, from the Civil War, of the
ancient regalia of the Plantagenets. Certain sacred vest-
ments were put upon the King, his heels were touched
with the golden spurs, and the lord who carried the
Sword of State exchanged it for another in a scabbard
of Purple Velvet which the Archbishop took, his brother
of York and the Bishops of London and of Winton going
along with him to present it to the King. The sword
was then girt upon the King in revival of an early usage ;
it was laid back upon the altar and there redeemed, with
a bag of silver, by the peer who first received it, who now
drew it and carried it naked before the King during the
rest of the solemnity.1 Then the King stood, while the
Armilla, like a bishop's stole, and the Imperial mantle,
like a bishop's cope, were put upon him by the sub- Dean.
1 Had the King been strong enough the oblation of the Sword " to God and to the altar,
in token that strength and power should first come from God and Holy Church," would have
been performed by his Majesty, according to the ancient rite which, in the English version of
1603, of Liber Regalis, says "Then he taketh of his sworde wherewith he was girt before,
with it he goeth to the altar and there offereth it up." But the redemption seems always to
have been performed by the peer of high rank (Comes aliis superior) acting as sword-bearer,
who in this case was Lord Londonderry, who performed his functions with great dignity of
gesture. According to the old use these symbolic ceremonies took place after the crowning.
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 301
After that the Archbishop delivered to the King, seated
in the first Edward's oaken chair, the Orb, the Ruby
Ring and the Sceptres, the aged primate reading the
stately words of the several investitures from scrolls, held
up before him by the Bishop of Winchester, because his
eyes were dim.
At last the supreme moment of the day had arrived.
The King was now clad in all his regal vestments and
possessed of all the ensigns of royal authority, save the
most important. The Archbishop, after saying at the altar
the prayer of consecration over the Crown, came down the
steps, and standing in front of the King lifted it from the
cushion on which it was held by the sub- Dean, a dignified
figure in his prebendal cope of red and gold. Then after a
movement of hesitation, due to his extreme feebleness, the
Archbishop placed the Imperial Crown on the head of
Edward VII. At all times the crowning of a monarch is a
solemn act. To-day it was doubly impressive, first because
of the new imperial significance added to the ancient rite,
and then because of the postponement of the ceremony,
when the Empire, at the hour of its loftiest pride, was
suddenly cast down with forebodings lest it should never
be accomplished. To the spectators who had passed
through the anxious days of June, the faltering of the
Archbishop caused an intense emotion, vague and instan-
taneous. The tension lasted but a moment. The Crown
was set upon the head of King Edward, and the pent-up
feeling of the vast multitude broke into a heartfelt, heart-
thrilling cry of " God save the King ! "
The peers, according to custom, had to put on their
coronets when the King was crowned. Some of them, not
perceiving the Primate's hesitation, performed this act almost
302 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
too soon ; but this passed unnoticed amid the acclamations
which filled the Abbey. As they died away, the trumpets,
which had signalled the crowning, were heard again accom-
panying the voices of the choir singing the old English
version of the Confortari, set to harmonies composed by the
skilled Master of the King's Musick. The Archbishop mean-
while presented the Bible to the King and bestowed on him
the benediction, in that noble liturgic language of which the
secret died in the seventeenth century. Then the King
arose, and turning to the west, appeared before his subjects
arrayed in all the attributes of majesty, crowned with the
Imperial Crown, vested with the Imperial Robe, and bear-
ing Sceptre and Orb in either hand. Advancing to the
throne he was " lifted up into it " by the prelates and peers
of the kingdom, while the Primate exhorted him to "hold
fast the Seat and State of Royal and Imperial Dignity."
Then enthroned upon it, his face turned towards the altar,
the King, surrounded with an imposing group of ecclesiastics
and great officers of state, prepared to receive the homage
of the Princes and the peers, beginning with the Lords
Spiritual, while the choir sang forth the lyrics of the
Hebrew prophet which seemed to foretell the glories of a
world-wide Empire assembling its people from the ends of
the earth.1
Before the King's illness it had been decided to shorten
the homage of the peers. Hitherto this had formed the
longest portion of the ceremony, the peers, one by one,
i " Behold, these shall come from far : and lo these from the north and from the west, and
these from the land of Sinim." The Homage Anthem, for which the verses from Isaiah
in which these words occur were chosen, in place of the traditional " The King shall rejoice in
Thy strength," were set to music by Sir Frederick Bridge, M.V.O., the accomplished organist
of Westminster Abbey and the Director of the Coronation Music, whose services and those of
his collaborators, Sir W. Parratt, Sir Hubert Parry and Sir C. Villiers Stanford are referred
to in Appendix I., which contains the names of the musicians and singers.
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 303
ascending the throne and touching the crown on the
sovereign's head and kissing his cheek. By an order of
His Majesty in Council, the personal act of homage was,
as we have seen, limited to the first peer of each degree.
Consequently, for the Lords Spiritual, the Archbishop of
Canterbury, being the senior member of the First Estate,
knelt before the King, while the rest of the bishops,
kneeling in their places, repeated after the Primate the
ancient words of homage just as they stand in the earliest
English version of the Coronation rite, made three hundred
years before.1 Then occurred a pathetic incident. The
Archbishop having recited the formula of homage, added
with deep emotion, " God bless you, Sir ; God be with you,
Sir " ; and endeavoured to rise to kiss the King's cheek.
But his strength failed, and though the King, with a noble
gesture, took him by the hands to help him to his feet, he
must have fallen had not the Bishop of Winchester sus-
tained him. Aided by the Bishop of London, and by the
Bishop of Bath and Wells, who stood supporting His
Majesty on the level of the Throne, the prelate who was
soon to succeed to the primacy guided the failing steps
of the old Archbishop, with the same strong arm which
had already rendered to him filial service in the previous
portions of the ceremony.
All who witnessed, from close at hand, the physical
feebleness of the Archbishop, were painfully anxious lest
he might break down and mar the perfection of the
ceremony. Their anxiety must have been doubly felt by
the King, just recovering from a sore illness and having
i The spelling is modified, and "will" is put instead of " shal," and "the United
Kingdom," etc., is substituted for "England"; but otherwise the formula now used, as
given in Appendix II., is identical with the translation of 1603.
304 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
no spare reserve of force to sustain unexpected emotions.
Nothing in the demeanour of His Majesty betrayed any
such fear. The King went through the rite, which would
have taxed the strength of the most robust, with the
serene vigour of one who had never known a day's
sickness. A special providence seemed to watch over
the ceremony and to guard from new disappointment the
King and his people, sufficiently tried in the mournful
days of June.1 There were some who felt that, in view
of the known infirmity of the Archbishop, it was unwise
to run the risk of a catastrophe which, had it occurred,
would have seemed of ill-omen to an empire filled with
a sense of the symbolical significance of the Coronation.
But as the great rite was consummated in perfect order,
1 It is indeed true that a special providence watched over the entire Coronation ceremony.
Dean Bradley was in a condition of greater weakness than was the Archbishop. By royal
permission all the ceremonial acts assigned to the Dean of Westminster were performed by
sub-Dean Duckworth, except the administration of the Chalice at the Communion. In that
solemn act the Dean's hands trembled so, that those who were near the Altar had a moment of
emotion, fearing that a grave accident was imminent, and he certainly would have fallen had
he not been supported by the Bishop of Bath and Wells. Archbishop Temple had perfect
possession of his faculties during the ceremony. The venerable Archbishop of Armagh, his
junior by three years, in some touching verses to commemorate his brother Primate, wrote : —
" We saw him in the Abbey — now near fainting
In pallor half sublime,
Until we thought God kept a great ensainting
For Coronation time."
But this was not quite accurate. He was not " near fainting," as his own words showed to
one of the prelates who went to his assistance at the Altar when he seemed in that condition.
" Go away," he said, " it isn't my head, it's my legs." During the Recess, when the Sovereigns
had retired to St Edward's Chapel at the end of the service, the Archbishop was resting in
an exhausted state on a seat at the back of the reredos, and as the King passed on his way
to his " Traverse," to repose after the ceremony, he turned to ask the Primate how he had
supported the fatigues of the day. The Archbishop tried to rise in response to the gracious
salutation, and might almost have pulled down the King, who had given him his hand, had
not the Bishop of Winchester and the Bishop of Bath and Wells held him up. — Archbishop
Temple remained a schoolmaster to the end, and many are the stories told by his suffragans
of the ways of " Frederick the Gruff," for whom, however, they had all a warm affection. One
of them was asked, " Then did the Archbishop always treat his suffragans as sixth-form boys ? "
" No," was the prompt reply, "as fourth-form boys."
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 305
we may be glad that the rarely interrupted tradition,
which has assigned the crowning of our kings to the
Archbishop of Canterbury, was not broken at the
Coronation of Edward VII. It was also said that, apart
from the danger of a mishap, the Archbishop's indistinct
vision and other physical weakness detracted from the
dignified smoothness of the ceremony. It is more
probable that the enfeeblement of the venerable Primate
added a dignity to his performance of the rite. Arch-
bishop Temple in the full possession of his physical
powers was never a prelate apt to pontificate at an
imposing ceremony. His rugged voice was perhaps
better attuned for an admonition to Rugby boys in Big
School, than for a stately liturgy in a royal sanctuary.
His stalwart presence, clad in episcopal broadcloth and
gaiters, of admirable force on a platform, was less at
ease enveloped in a mediaeval cope at a regal pageant.
The burden of years which, at the Coronation, made his
voice to tremble, his limbs to falter, and his eye to
misread the written word, softened the asperities of his
manner, and in his weakness he presented the figure
of valiant old age, struggling, with the power which
awaits us all, to achieve a final act of duty. But the
crowning of his King was not fated to be the last public
deed of Frederick Temple's laborious life. A more
appropriate closing scene was reserved for the career
of him who, though a highly efficient bishop and a
zealous social reformer, was primarily a great school-
master, when four months later he sank down on the
episcopal bench of the House of Lords in the act of
discussing the education of the children of England, the
direction of which had been his earliest vocation.
306 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
According to the ancient traditions of the English
Coronation order, the spirituality is given such precedence
over the temporality that the lords of the First Estate
are admitted to do homage to the sovereign even before
the Princes of the Blood.1 Consequently it was not until
after the bishops had given their oath of fealty, that the
Prince of Wales knelt before the King and did homage
for himself and for his illustrious relatives, the Duke
of Connaught and the Duke of Cambridge. The
homage of the Prince of Wales was in some respects the
most moving episode of the day. The heir-apparent had
performed, with reverential dignity, the graceful ceremony,
prescribed by the rubric, of touching the King's crown with
his right hand and kissing him on the left cheek. Then
for a moment the sovereign and the liege-man disappeared,
and only a father and a son were face to face. With a
gesture of infinite tenderness, which needs the heart of a
father to command, the royal sire drew to his arms his only
remaining son and, in the sight of his people, embraced
him ; while, in the majesty of motherhood, the Queen
looked on with eyes which bore the divine trace of the
sorrows as well as of the joys of maternity and before
which, perhaps, passed a vision, unperceived in the jubilant
throng, save by the father upon the throne and the brother
who knelt before him. The scene lasted only for an instant ;
1 The practice of the Spiritual Peers doing homage before the Princes of the Blood, who are
lords of parliament, seems to be as old as the ceremony of the homage of the Estates. Under
the Tudors there were no Princes of the Blood Royal who were peers at the time of any
coronation, and this was the case at the coronations of James I. and Charles I. But when
Charles II. was crowned his brother and heir, the Duke of York, did homage after the
bishops ; and again, at the coronation of William and Mary, their brother-in-law, Prince
George of Denmark, who was created Duke of Cumberland on that occasion, did likewise.
When his wife Queen Anne was crowned it seems, from the London Gazette of that date, that
Prince George paid his homage before the archbishops, being Prince Consort, though there
is no direction to this effect in the Form of Coronation used in 1702.
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 307
yet in a certain sense it had a profound significance. The
secret of England's imperial greatness was bound up in it.
This is not the language of sentimental loyalism, but a
calm conclusion deduced from the national annals of sixty
years. It has been shown in these pages that the con-
servation and consolidation of the British Empire has been
chiefly due to the influence of the Crown on the imagina-
tion of the British race. But that influence could not have
been effective without the particular sentiment inspired by
the royal family in the hearts of the nation. The long
tradition of the Crown existed before it was worn by Queen
Victoria ; but it was rarely called to mind or made an active
force in the relations of the sovereign with the people,
until, in the late reign, the domestic life of the royal family
became a national institution of which the whole community
was proud. Similarly, when the children of Queen Victoria
were dispersed, nothing strengthened the revived loyalty
of the nation more than the glimpses which it sometimes
had of the affection which reigned between parent and off-
spring in the first household of the land of the succeeding
generation. If the royal family had been torn by rivalries
and animosities, not only by such as those which in time
past used to range princes of the blood on opposite sides
in political controversies, but even by disputes which in all
ranks of society often characterise the mutual dealings of
relatives, in that case the influence of the Crown would
have been prejudiced in England and would not have gone
forth from our shores to touch the hearts of colonists, whose
strongest instinct is often a sentimental love for all that
concerns the home-life of the old country. The public
belief that the relations of Queen Victoria with her children,
and of King Edward with his, were of a united and affec-
308 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
tionate nature would not have sufficed to endow the Crown
with the popularity which has enabled it to become the
emblem and the instrument of empire. The example of
Charles I. shows that a prince may be a devoted father
and an unloved king. But there can be no doubt that
those qualities of the royal house in our day which have
permitted the people of England and of the Empire to share
the domestic joys and troubles of the family which stands
around the throne, have been a powerful factor in confirming
it as the seat and state of imperial dignity.
If the homage of the Prince of Wales produced an in-
cident which appealed to the tender ties of union between
the Crown and the people, the homage of the temporal
peers was a testimony to that continuity of tradition which
is the envy of foreign admirers of British institutions, who
see in it one of their chief sources of stability. On the five
steps of the throne, knelt in the order of their several
degrees, the fifteenth Duke of Norfolk, the sixteenth
Marquess of Winchester, the twentieth Earl of Shrewsbury,
the twelfth Viscount Falkland, and the twenty-first Baron
de Ros. Of the Dukes of Norfolk, who since the days of
the Tudors have been at the head of the nobility of Eng-
land, we have already spoken. Lord Winchester, whose
marquessate was almost coeval with his minor titles, was
the head of a family ennobled by Henry VIII. which in-
creased its fame when Basing House was defended for
King Charles by the fifth marquess, whose gallant example,
celebrated by Dryden, sent the fifteenth of his name to die
a soldier's death on the veldt of South Africa. Lord
Shrewsbury was the head of the Talbots, who had sat
among the peers of the realm under the Plantagenets, and
his earldom had been bestowed on the great captain who
THE CROWNING OF THE KING 309
died fighting the Maid of Orleans. Lord Falkland (who
did homage in the place of the premier Viscount, Lord
Hereford) was the collateral of Lucius Gary, the Cavalier
whose patriotic melancholy immortalised the fatal field of
Newbury. Lord de Ros bore a title, more ancient than the
English Parliament, conferred upon his ancestor in 1264, the
year that the victory of Lewes placed Simon de Montfort
at the head of the people of England.
It has been said, in criticism of this ceremony, that some
of these bearers of historic names had no personal achieve-
ment to their credit, to make them worthy of being set
above their fellow-subjects in a great national festival. If
that be true, their exaltation for one day is less to be
criticised in our time than at any previous period. For the
prominence given to these members of the Second Estate
by right of services performed by distant ancestors, is a
wholesome act in an age of materialism, when there is a
tendency to believe that every social privilege may be pur-
chased, and that the acquisition of money is the most
laudable achievement for modern man to aim at. No doubt
the line of conduct pursued, sometimes, by the inheritors of
historical titles renders difficult the task of those who would
defend ancient traditions. At the same time it has not been
rare, even in our day, to see Englishmen thus endowed with
antique hereditary distinction, winning by their own merit
the highest positions in the land. The example of the
Stanleys has already been mentioned. The heir to another
title, much older than that of Derby, the barony of Dacre,
was twenty years ago the First Commoner of England, and
was so proud of having attained the chair of the Victorian
House of Commons that he was willing to accept, in token
of his services as Speaker, a modern Viscounty, in which
3io THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
had to be merged, when he succeeded to it, the title borne
by his ancestors before the days of Cre^y and Poitiers.
The most venerable figure at the Coronation of King
Edward was the last survivor of the Young England party,
the Duke of Rutland, who was a Cabinet Minister fifty
years before, and who began his well-filled public life in
1841 as Mr Gladstone's colleague in the representation of
Newark ; and he was descended in direct line from Sir
George Manners, who at the death of his mother in 1487
succeeded to four feudal baronies already ancient.
When we look at the other prominent nations of the world
and see them cut off from their historic past in the course
of revolutions, or else possessing no tradition and having no
other ideal than that of material prosperity, we may con-
gratulate ourselves on the uninterrupted preservation of the
continuity of our history. For thereby we can show to our
neighbours and to our rivals that the retention by a people
of ancient usages and institutions is not only not incom-
patible with unsurpassed power and prestige in the modern
world, but that their possession, by stimulating national
pride, may be a potent source of those qualities. It was a
significant and eloquent spectacle at the Coronation to see
a baron whose title was created in the lifetime of the signers
of Magna Charta paying, in immemorial form, homage to the
King under the eyes of the Prime Minister of the demo-
cracy of New Zealand, who wore the insignia of a Privy
Councillor, which showed him to be a member of a body
instituted by a predecessor of Edward VII. before the
existence of the oldest order of the peerage.1 For it is also
1 The Curia Regis, which contained the concilium ordinarium of the King, as well as the
germ of the three Courts of Law which survived till 1875, was founded not later than in the
reign of Henry I. After the King's Bench, Common Pleas and Exchequer became separate
THE CROWNING OF THE KING AND QUEEN 311
to be remarked that, excepting the Church of Christ, the
most ancient institution represented in Westminster Abbey
was the monarchy itself. Before the Curia Regis was
organised, before the first Barony by tenure was conferred,
before the earliest constitution of the national parliament,
the King of England was on his throne.
IV
When the Homage was done the drums were beaten,
the trumpets were sounded, and all the people shouted,
crying out, "God save King Edward, Long live King
Edward, May the King live for ever." The solemnity
of the King's Coronation being thus ended, we shall not
have to dwell at length on the remaining portions of the
service, which included the Coronation of the Queen and
the Communion.
The Archbishop of Canterbury left the King on his
throne and was assisted to his chair, while the Archbishop
of York proceeded to crown Queen Alexandra. The
appointment of the Primate of the Northern Province
to perform that ceremony gave rise to some controversy
among experts learned in liturgical precedents. The last
occasion on which an Archbishop of York had performed
the act of Coronation was in 1068, when Ealdred, the titular
of that see, crowned Queen Mathilda at Westminster
Abbey seventeen months after her husband, William the
courts, the concilium ordinarium remained as the King's permanent council of advice in all
matters of administration. The term Privy Council seems to have been first applied to it in
the reign of Henry VI. (Stubbs1 Const. Hist. , i. , Select. Chart. Introd. , etc. ) Even if the Privy
Council can, strictly speaking, be said only to date from the latter reign, it is a significant
circumstance that the popular leaders of the great democracies of our Colonies should be proud
to assume a dignity, which has been conferred by successive kings upon eminent servants of the
Crown ever since the wars of the Roses.
312 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Conqueror, had received the crown in the same place,
from the hands of the same prelate. An Elizabethan
writer, more than five hundred years later, speaks of
the Archbishop of York as the proper person to anoint
the sovereign in the absence of the Archbishop of
Canterbury.1 But this theory is denied by certain
authorities of profound erudition, who say that ancient
law and custom prescribe that, when the Archbishop
of Canterbury is unable to act, he must issue a com-
mission to one of his own suffragans. The argument
would seem to be that the province of York has no right
to interfere in ceremonies which take place in the southern
province and that the participation of its Archbishop in
the Coronation, even in the minor rite of crowning the
Queen-Consort, is an infringement of the immemorial
privileges of the church of Canterbury. That such a
controversy should be possible in the twentieth century
is a matter for national satisfaction. England is the only
country in the world in which such a question could be
raised, except as an antiquarian discussion having no
relation with the modern state. Whatever the merits of
the two contentions, we may rejoice that, amid the
materialism of the age, there are men of our nation who
cannot sleep at night because the opportunism of Ealdred
the Saxon before his Norman conquerors and the insub-
mission of Stigand were construed into a precedent to
enable Dr Maclagan to relieve Dr Temple of part of
his prescriptive labours, eight hundred and thirty-six years
after the Battle of Hastings.
1 Nicholas Sanders, De origine ac progressu Schismatis Anglicani, 1585. This writer is
quoted by Dr J. Wickham Legg, in order to refute him, in the Introduction to The Coronation
Order of King James I. , 1902. On the last occasion when a Queen-Consort was crowned, in
1831, Archbishop Howley crowned both King William IV. and Queen Adelaide.
THE CROWNING OF THE KING AND QUEEN 313
The Coronation of the Queen was a graceful epilogue to
the august drama of the crowning of the King. Of the
twenty-three queens-consort who have knelt before the
altar of St Peter's Abbey at Westminster to receive the
crown,1 it is probable that none exceeded Queen Alexandra
in beauty and in dignity. The art of portrait-painting was
in its infancy when Eleanor of Castile, Philippa of Hain-
ault, Anne of Bohemia, Joan of Navarre, Katherine of
France, and Margaret of Anjou bowed their queenly heads
to accept the sacred unction and the diadem. The romantic
sonority of their names evokes a vision of the pageant of
English history which marched adown the avenue of time,
from the age of chivalry to the Renaissance, attended by a
retinue of crusaders and captive kings, of the last feudal
barons and the first nimble gunners with the linstock, over
a pathway strewn with the lilies of France, mingled at the
end with the roses of York and Lancaster. We can hear
their speech from Froissart, who told how Philippa pleaded
in French with her king after the siege of Calais, or from
Shakespeare, who shows us the victor of Agincourt van-
quished by Katherine confessing to him brokenly with her
English tongue. We can see their various costumes — the
snood, the embroidered placket, the jewelled quoif, the inter-
tissued robe of pearl and gold. But what the forms and
features were like of the partners of our English kings, we
have only a vague tradition, until after the Tudors came.
1 Since the Coronation of Henry VIII. and Catherine of Arragon, all the queens-consort,
who have received the crown, have been crowned at Westminster at the same time as their
kings, except Anne Boleyn, who was the only one of the five last consorts of Henry VIII.
to be crowned. Previously, from William the Conqueror and Matilda, to Henry VII. and
Elizabeth of York, in only two instances were the king and the queen crowned the same day —
Edward I. and Eleanor of Castile on August 19, 1274 (which coronation was the last to take
place in August till that of King Edward VII. and Queen Alexandra), and Edward II. and
Isabel of France, on February 25, 1308.
314 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Henceforward authentic portraits are extant of the queens-
consort who were crowned at Westminster, including that
other Danish princess, who, by marrying James I., became
the ancestress of the House of Hanover.1 It would be
a poor compliment to Queen Alexandra to say that her
beauty was fairer than that of her crowned predecessors
whose features are preserved on the canvases of three
centuries of court painters.2
We have said that this long line of queens knelt before
the altar at Westminster to receive their crowns. This in-
dicates one of the important points of difference which dis-
tinguished the Coronation of the Queen-Consort from that
of the King. The Queen was crowned and anointed kneel-
ing ; the King during both ceremonies was seated in the
ancient coronation chair. He was anointed, as we have
seen, on the head, the breast and the hands ; the Queen
received the holy oil on the head alone.3 She, moreover,
did not take the Orb, nor was she invested with special robes
for the ceremony. Another distinctive feature of Queen
Alexandra's Coronation was the presence of graceful women
in the sanctuary, in attendance upon her Majesty. Aided
by an octave of handsome pages, the Mistress of the Robes 4
1 This princess was a member of the House of Oldenburg, of the same illustrious line from
which Queen Alexandra is sprung. Her father, Frederick II., King of Denmark and Norway
(the son of Christian III., the ally of Gustavus Vasa), was the enlightened patron of Tycho
Brahe, and was also one of the suitors of Queen Elizabeth, who refused him her hand, but
gave him the Garter.
a The most beautiful of the queens-consort between Catherine of Arragon and Adelaide of
Saxe-Meiningen was Henrietta Maria ; but she was not one of those who were crowned at
Westminster.
3 The ceremonial of the coronation of the queen-consort seems to have become less
elaborate in the course of centuries. Queen Anne, the consort of James I., was anointed on
her head, hands and breast. But the Form and Order for the Coronation of George II. directs
that Queen Caroline shall be anointed only on the head and breast.
4 The Duchess of Buccleuch and Queensberry. The pages in the order in which they stood
were Mr J. W. Bigge, Viscount Torrington, Earl of Macclesfield, Marquess of Stafford, Hon.
Edward Lascelles, Lord Claud Hamilton, Hon. Robert Palmer, and Hon. Arthur Anson.
THE CROWNING OF THE KING AND QUEEN 315
bore the Queen's train, emblazoned with emblems of the
realm and of the Empire. Four other duchesses, represent-
ing the peerages of England, Scotland, Great Britain and
the United Kingdom,1 summoned by a King of Arms,2
held over the Queen a rich pall of cloth of gold, while the
Archbishop of York anointed her. Once more the
feminine element became conspicuous in this portion of the
service, when at the crowning of the Queen the peeresses,
with a rhythmical movement of gleaming arms,3 placed
their crimson-capped coronets on their heads. Then when
she had received the Sceptre and the Ivory Rod, the Queen
arose, bearing nobly the crown upon her head. Supported
by her two Bishops, she advanced, a gracious figure, from
the altar, and as she passed the King on his throne the
Queen bowed herself reverently to his Majesty, and then
without further ceremony took her place on her own throne.
On the remainder of the service we need not dwell long.
With solemn dignity was celebrated the Holy Com-
munion, prefaced by the oblations made by the King, first
of bread and wine, and then of an altar-cloth and of an
ingot of gold, the Queen at the same time offering a pall
and a mark-weight of gold. Then when the whole Corona-
tion Office had been thus performed, their Majesties passed
out of sight of the congregation, for the Recess, the King
proceeding through a door on the south side of the altar
and the Queen through one on the north side. There in St
Edward's Chapel, attended by the prelates and the lords who
1 The Duchess of Marlborough, the Duchess of Montrose, the Duchess of Portland and the
Duchess of Sutherland.
2 Norroy, Mr W. H. Weldon, acted for Garter, Sir Albert Woods, who was unable to per-
form his picturesque duties.
3 "Gleaming gloves" would perhaps be a more accurate description, as the peculiar
shimmering effect observed when the peeresses put on their coronets was caused by the light
reflected on their white gloves.
316 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
had taken part in the Coronation, the King delivered the
regalia to be placed on the altar, which had been erected
at the foot of the Confessor's shrine. The contrast was
remarkable to go from the gorgeous tumult of the Abbey
into the quiet seclusion of the chapel where only the
triumphant strains of the Te Deum, wafted over the
high altar, called to mind the presence beyond the screen
of thousands of an Empire's delegates. The eastern
section of the great church, thus cut off from the congre-
gation, was devoid of occasional decorations, save for the
two v< Traverses," or curtained canopies, erected as retiring
rooms for the sovereign and his Consort, where the King was
to change his Imperial Mantle for his Royal Robe of purple
velvet, and where the Queen was to be apparelled in like
manner for their farewell progress through the abbey to the
west door. For a moment, before retiring, the King arrayed
in all the immemorial insignia of majesty, stood almost alone,
the centre of a little group of ecclesiastics in antique vest-
ments and of pages who might have attended his ancestress,
Eleanor of Provence, — with no other surrounding than the
noble serenity of the ancient fabric. Then he looked back
to where his mighty forerunners lay amid the grey tracery
of Henry VII.'s chapel. As there was no sign of festal
ornament, no modern crowd, the Gothic architecture became
the setting for a scene, such as little children see in their
dreams, of a bygone age when kings went about in crowns
and stately robes amid their subjects, likewise in picturesque
attire, conferring upon them favours with the hand which
had to lay aside the sceptre to bestow them. Such was the
final act performed by King Edward at his Coronation.
Seated against the crumbling stone of the screen, the old
archbishop, wrapped in his mediaeval cope, rested his feeble
THE CROWNING OF THE KING AND QUEEN 317
limbs, overtasked with his ceremonial labours. To him
came the crowned and mantled King, stretching forth his
hands, when he had laid the sceptre down, cheering the
tired old man with gracious gesture and kindly word, just as
a father of his people might have done, in an ancient realm
of the days when all the world was beautiful.
CHAPTER VI
THE IMPERIAL CROWN
I
WEARING the Imperial Crown, the King passed forth
from Westminster Abbey, and through the crowded
streets resounding with the cheers of his people,
whose acclamations were the more fervent because of the feel-
ing of relief which filled all hearts now that the great act of
consecration had at last been accomplished. The Coronation
of King Edward was a national rite of such unique import-
ance that we will not dwell on the celebrations outside the
walls of the Abbey, which attended his assumption of the im-
perial emblems, though some of them were profoundly sug-
gestive. Such were the two reviews passed by the King,
in the garden of Buckingham Palace, of his troops, from the
Colonies and from India, which had formed his escort and
had lined the streets when he went to be crowned. The
aspect of those defenders of the Imperial Crown, peaceful
citizens from English-settled lands throughout the globe,
and martial warriors from the untamed tribes of Asia, has
been described in the pages which told of the gathering of
the Empire's forces, warlike and pacific, for the Coronation
of the King. When the representatives of the Indian army
came to salute their Emperor within the precincts of his
palace, the spectacle which, lit up by the sun, would have
been of sumptuous splendour, was dulled by a downpour of
THE IMPERIAL CROWN 319
rain. Yet, though the scenic effect was thus impaired, the
significance of the sight was enhanced by the inclemency of
the English climate. For the race inured to it had, amid
its rigours, acquired that force which, in a few generations,
had made a handful of men of British birth the masters of
the millions who for two thousand years had lived on war
and conquest by the ardent shores of Ganges or Hydaspes.
Of another significance was the inspection by the King of
a portion of his fleet, which lay moored at Spithead, a
week after the Coronation. The vast array of battleships
assembled for review, when the King fell ill, could not be
called together again. But the muster of men-of-war, im-
provised as it were to fire the parting salute of the great
imperial festival, was even more suggestive than the full-
dress parade of the navy which had been prepared at
midsummer. It used to be said that certain continental
monarchs vaunted that they could inspect before breakfast,
on any morning of the week, a body of troops more
numerous than the whole home forces of the British army.
A prouder boast might have been made by the King of all
the Britains on that August day. For when he sailed
through never-ending lines of ironclads, which, wonder-
struck landsmen were told, composed only a detachment
of one of the fleets of England, King Edward might have
retorted that on a summer's afternoon he could review, in
English waters, a stupendous armada without diverting a
single vessel from its post of vigilance on distant seas.
Such were the incidental features of the celebrations which
attended the Coronation of King Edward, making it stand
apart from the assumption of royal and imperial dignity by
any monarch in the history of the world. With the most
important ceremonies of the kind, which occurred in the
320 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
century preceding the Coronation of Edward VII., we have
dealt at length. There is no need to enter into any
recapitulation of what has been written about them. The
connection of those historical events, with one another and
with the state of civilisation at the present day, has been
fully traced in the foregoing chapters. One or two other
themes cognate to the subject of the investiture of King
Edward with the Imperial Crown would be interesting to
examine. But their consideration would involve the
discussion of questions which can have no place in these
pages. Thus, to those who have made a comparative
study of systems of government, the contemplation of the
Imperial Crown on the head of the King of England at once
suggests a demonstration of the advantages which have
accrued to the British race from the monarchical form of
government. But such an argument would be bald if
illustrated only by abstract propositions and by unsupported
assertions. It would be necessary to indicate, with examples,
the disadvantages of republican systems, and this could not
be done without submitting to criticism certain features in
the governments of great republics with which the English
crown and nation are on terms of cordial amity. For
obvious reasons such a comparison would be out of place in
a work like this.
The growth of the imperial idea within the British
Empire is another thesis, which might make a fitting
sequel to the foregoing pages. Even if that subject were
not too vast to lend itself to cursory treatment, it would
be difficult to deal with it here, because public opinion is
not unanimous within the King's domains as to the best
means of developing and of applying it. But there is one
aspect of the question which has found its legitimate place
THE IMPERIAL CROWN 321
in these pages. In them it has been constantly repeated
that the imperial idea has emanated from the Crown. By
that expression it was not meant that it owed its birth to the
personal policy of the sovereign, though it could not have
acquired strength under a monarch who was not beloved and
wise. It was generated by the genius of the British race,
which annexed and settled distant lands, in days when such
enterprise called for qualities of courage, self-denial and per-
severance. But the British Empire, so built up, would have
failed, as we have seen, to remain united but for the con-
solidating, binding influence of the British Crown. Pioneer
settlers and colonial administrators, by their loyal labours,
have carried the imperial idea across the globe ; political
writers and thinkers have popularised it at home, guiding
public opinion, with wise insight, as to the true nature of
our mission beyond the seas ; patriotic statesmen by their
action, parliaments by their measures have popularised it ;
— Paulus plantavit, rigavit Apollo. But their work would
have been incomplete without the influence of the Crown
of England, which has become the rallying symbol of the
British Empire and the emblem of imperial unity.
We may, therefore, in conclusion, consider very briefly the
history of the Imperial Crown, placed on the head of King
Edward with ancient rites which have been in use during
long centuries, wherein the whole range of human thought
has undergone transformation, and yet which still have a
profound significance to the national mind of the foremost
people in the modern world. The material possessions
which the English race enjoys are not the chief part of its
birthright, bequeathed to it by its fathers in the course of
ages. With an empire wider than those which submitted
to the yoke of Persia or of Rome in antiquity, or than that
x
322 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
which Spain lost by ill-government in modern times, we
have inherited from our ancestors order and freedom.
Those supreme ends of human polity have not been
achieved as the fruit of revolution, breaking the continuity
of our national history. In the great nations of the earth
which have so cut themselves adrift from their past, neither
order nor freedom exists in such perfection as within the
British Empire, whatever their forms of government. The
reason why we have maintained them, is that to order and
liberty we have added tradition, a most precious heritage
possessed by none of the peoples which would dispute our
supremacy in the world ; and the emblem of that tradition
is the Crown.
II
It was by a happy choice that the diadem placed on the
head of Edward VII. by the Archbishop of Canterbury
was the Imperial Crown. The usual practice was for the
sovereign to receive solemnly, from the hands of the Arch-
bishop, St Edward's Crown, and to assume the Imperial
Crown only after the rites of coronation were ended,
when, during the Recess, he was arrayed in the royal
robes.1 If the crown which is called St Edward's had
iThis is what took place at the coronation of James I. (when the old Anglo-Saxon
crown existed), and therefore probably at most of the Tudor coronations when the
ceremonies were used which are found in the Liber Regalis, from which is translated the
first English " Form and Order " of 1603. In the rubrics for the coronation of James I. "it
is to bee provided that all the Regalia (that is) Kinge Edwarde the Confessors crowne and
other Ornamentes, together with the Ampull . . . bee laide readi* uppon the Aulter," but
that "the croun imperiall and other roabes royall which the Kinge is to wear, after the rites
of his coronation ended be layd down reddy in the traverse." At the unusual coronation of
William and Mary, where two sovereigns were crowned, neither of them being a consort,
the crown of Edward the Confessor had disappeared and its substitute was brand new.
There is evidence which seems to indicate that on this occasion both King and Queen were
crowned with " Crowns Imperial," probably made for the purpose. In the "Order and Manner
THE IMPERIAL CROWN 323
any right to that name it would not have been discarded
from its ancient use. But the original crown of the Con-
fessor, which was believed to have been also worn a
hundred and seventy years earlier by Alfred the Great,
disappeared during the Commonwealth, and the crown
used in its place at subsequent coronations was manu-
factured at the Restoration and reset after the accession
of William and Mary in 1689. As there was no crown
in the regalia of venerable age, as we count antiquity
in the annals of our monarchy, it was befitting that at
the first coronation which was an imperial festival, the
precedent should be formally established of placing upon
the sovereign's head, before his people, the emblem which
had inherited the title, at least four centuries old, of
Imperial Crown.
The crown of England seems first to have been called
" imperial " under the Tudors, under whom the germ of the
sentiment, to which that epithet is applied in our day, took its
rise. It has been sometimes traced to the echo of the legend
of Alfred the Great, who was said to have assumed the title
of Emperor of Britain as a reply to the revival by Charle-
magne of the Western Empire. But when Alfred began his
of the Coronation of King William and Queen Mary " it is distinctly said that the Coronation office
being ended, the King and Queen " descend from their thrones . . . and so they proceed in
state into King Edward's chapel and standing before the Altar there, take off their Imperial
Crowns." Nothing could indicate more clearly than these words that the sovereigns had
been crowned with Imperial Crowns, and this is corroborated by the Duke of Dorset's warrant
addressed to the Master of the Jewell House demanding " For His Mae one Imperiall Crowne
of gold . . . and for Her Mae one Imperiall Crowne." Dr Wickham Legg, whose opinion is
of the highest value, ttifnks that this is a mistake, which was repeated in the directions for
the Coronation services of Queen Anne and George I. As to what took place at the corona-
tions of those two monarchs I will not venture an opinion ; but at the coronation of William
and Mary I am disposed to think that, as the sovereigns were co-equal, it would have been
invidious to bestow St Edward's crown on either one of them, so both were crowned with
Imperial crowns. If a precedent were needed this would afford one, borne out by docu-
mentary evidence, for the crowning of King Edward VII. with the Imperial crown.
324 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
reign Charlemagne had been in his grave at Aix-la-Chapelle
for fifty-seven years, and his empire was in course of dis-
memberment. Whereas, when Henry VIII. in the Act of
Succession, and again in the Act of Supremacy, called his
crown " imperial," he had for his chief rival in Europe a
great Emperor whose imperial dignity sorely vexed his
ambition. On the death of the Emperor Maximilian in
1519, Henry had advanced his pretensions to the first
station among Christian princes. When the only imperial
crown of that epoch was conferred on his nephew, Charles
V., Henry in vain tried to console himself by the belief that,
in the balanced contest between the Emperor and Francis
I. of France, he was the arbiter of Europe. Throughout
his successive friendships and disputes with those monarchs
he nourished a profound jealousy of the influence and
position of the Emperor, which was one of the motives of
his audacious ecclesiastical policy. It was after Charles, at
the height of his power, had been recrowned Emperor, by
Pope Clement VII., at Bologna in 1530, that Henry retorted
by formally investing the crown of England with the epithet
" imperial." It is clear that the imperial idea, thus propa-
gated by Henry, was only in a limited sense the germ of
the sentiment from which sprang the British Empire.
Henry VIII. was already born when Columbus discovered
the western world ; so the idea of an Empire beyond Euro-
pean seas could have been but vague in the most ambitious
mind of that day. Henry's imperial yearnings were no
doubt a relic of the time, only seventy years before his
birth, when, after Agincourt, the English Crown was
for the last time paramount on French territory. The
application of the epithet "imperial" to the crown, though
it had no reference to domains beyond the ocean, was
THE IMPERIAL CROWN 325
an assertion of the idea that England was destined to be
not a self-contained country, but the metropolis of an
Empire. Fortunately for the history of our people, the
domination of the English Crown over great regions
of the European continent was never renewed ; but a
practical step effected by Henry in laying the foundations
of the Empire was when, in 1542, he assumed the title
of King of Ireland, in the place of the older title of Lord,
thus uniting a new kingdom to the Imperial Crown.
Previously in the Royal Succession Act,1 passed after the
marriage of Henry VIII. with Anne Boleyn, his parliament
decreed that in default of sons, of his body begotten, then
the Imperial Crown should be to the eldest issue female of
that marriage, " which is the Lady Elizabeth." It is a
fact of high historical interest that the Imperial Crown of
England should have been first recognised by parliament
for the benefit of the princess who was the first English
sovereign to foster the imperial idea, as we understand it,
and who, in doing so, laid the foundations of the British
Empire beyond the seas.
The phrase thus used by a monarch to give expression
to his ambitious aims, for himself, and for England, passed
thenceforward into the constitutional terminology of the
1 25 Hen. VIII., c. 22. The Act of Supremacy, 26 Hen. VIII., c. i, enacted that the
King should have " annexed and united to the Imperial Crown of this realm " all honours,
jurisdictions, etc., appertaining to the dignity of Supreme Head of the Church of Eng-
land. Again, by 27 Henry VIII., c. 26, Wales was incorporated with England "under the
Imperial Crown of this realm." It is important to notice the dates of these successive reitera-
tions of imperial pretension, following upon the breach with Rome, the jealousy inspired by
the Emperor and the birth of Elizabeth— which last event took place in 1533. These statutes
were the work of the famous parliament of 1529, which first sounded the imperial note in the
Act of 1532, which abolished appeals, from the Ecclesiastical Courts, to Rome and in which the
world was informed that " This realm of England is an Empire." It was not till 1544 that
parliament confirmed Henry VIII. 's assumption of the style of King of Ireland, which title
had a more effective meaning when James I. inherited it, in the year that Mountjoy completed
the conquest of Ireland.
326 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
land. So when his son Edward VI. succeeded him,
we find in the official accounts of the Coronation that
one of the three crowns then used was the Imperial
Crown.1 During the reigns of the son, and of the elder
daughter of Henry VIII., who had been put into the
succession by a later statute,2 the youth of the one
and the foreign sympathies of the other checked for
more than ten years the aspirations of the nation.
Then came Elizabeth. With her the imperial terms applied
to the appurtenances of royalty, entered into the literary
language of the English people. So familiar had the term
"imperial crown" become that it was attributed to bygone
monarchs of the realm by Shakespeare,3 whose work remains
to this day a monument of the spirit which animated the
Elizabethan age, and one of the most precious links to bind
together the English race, which in his time began the
conquest of the world. A symptom of the development of
this imperial idea is found in the Coronation Order of James
I. In this first English version of the coronation service,
which was drawn up immediately after the death of the
great Queen, the expression "crown imperial" was used
again and again in the rubrics. That this was no accidental
use of the phrase is testified to by a foreign witness of the
ceremony, who from his official position had reason to note
the significance of the words. This Roman diplomatist, at
the end of his detailed report of the Coronation, which he
sent to the Nuncio at Paris, writes, " I will say in conclu-
sion that the King has been crowned with a crown and
sceptre imperial, and as Emperor of his kingdoms." 4
1 Acts of the Privy Council, 1547-50. 2 35 Hen. VIII., c. i.
3 e.g. King Henry V., Act iv. sc. i, etc. etc.
4 The Report of Giovanni degli Effetti, dated from Hampton Court, August 7, 1603, pro-
ceeds after the words "Emperor of his kingdoms," "and Head of the Church. And the
THE IMPERIAL CROWN 327
That the Stuarts were unworthy of the imperial tradition
which they inherited from Elizabeth is a commonplace of
history. But the view often taken of their epoch, while
it brings into just relief the imperial instinct and genius of
Cromwell, places the monarchy in an unjust light. It is
true that the few years, in the seventeenth century, of
England's formidable eminence in the world were those
of the Protectorate, while the two long periods, in that cen-
tury, during which she was of no weight in European politics
coincided with the reigns of the four first Stuarts. But
the reason of the contrast was not that the Stuarts were
kings and that the Protector was the president of a republic.
The reason is that Cromwell was a great Elizabethan,
imbued with the spirit of the queen whose subject he was
born ; l while the four first Stuarts, who were never at home
in England, were of temperament and character antago-
nistic to the patriotic instinct which pervaded the policy
of Elizabeth. When Cromwell was born, Drake and
Frobisher had just died, the victims of their world-
conquering adventures, and he grew up to manhood the
witness of the treatment meted out by James I. to Raleigh,
the most illustrious survivor of the last reign. Had
he been born forty years earlier, he might have been
a minister of Elizabeth, whose renown had put that
of Walsingham or of Burleigh in the shade. Had
Church service was that of the Protestants, and with this I kiss your hand." The conclusion
of this despatch, of which Dr Wickham Legg found a transcript at the Public Record Office,
is a corroboration, from an agent of the Papacy, of what has been said about the genesis of the
imperial attributes of our monarchy.
1 This was finely put by Mr Swinburne, who appreciated the imperial spirit of the Elizabethan
age long before imperialism was ever talked about : —
' ' That sovereign lordship of the sea
Bequeathed to Cromwell from Elizabeth."
328 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Elizabeth left a son or a grandson, worthy to succeed her,
with Cromwell as the chief counsellor of such a sovereign,
England might have been brought to a prouder height
than that of France under Richelieu. The characters of
Elizabeth and of Cromwell had many points in common :
both were autocrats impatient of constitutional restraints ;
both were proud of England and resolved that she should
hold an imperial position worthy of their pride. It was
one of the ironies of history that the chief of the parlia-
mentarians should have been a dictator despising parlia-
ments, and that the great imperialist should have abrogated
the imperial crown. But whatever the nature of his
domestic administration, his policy and prestige beyond the
seas made his term of government a fragment of the
Elizabethan age set down in the middle of the inglorious
seventeenth century.
Although the personal qualities of the Stuarts brought
disadvantage to England, their succession to the crown
was, in one particular, of inestimable benefit. It brought
about peacefully the union with Scotland which, had it
been effected by the English conquest of that country,
would have left ineffaceable discord and rancour between
the inhabitants of North and South Britain. The year
in which Elizabeth died is one of the most important
turning-points in our national history. It was then that
both Scotland and Ireland became parts of the same
dominion with England, from which junction of the three
kingdoms, under one crown, the British Empire took its
start. But Scotland, unlike Ireland, in becoming part
of that Empire preserved her dignity. She gave a King
instead of having one imposed upon her, and her insti-
THE IMPERIAL CROWN 329
tutions remained independent of those of England until a
century later, when by the Act of Union the Parliaments of
the two countries became one. None but happy results
have ensued from the joining of Scotland to England. The
rude, poor, and turbulent extremity of our island has, under
the Union, become one of the most cultivated, prosperous,
and tranquil regions of Europe. Its inhabitants, formerly
separated from its southern neighbours by mutual aversion,
have not only peacefully invaded their territory and aided
to develop its commercial resources, but have taken the lead
in their empire-building enterprises beyond the seas. With-
out the succession of the Stuarts the unification of Great
Britain and the erection of the first storey of the fabric of
the British Empire would have been delayed, while the
Scots, regarding us as their rivals instead of as their undis-
tinguishable partners, would have had neither the faculty,
the desire, nor the opportunity, to become master-builders
of the structure of Greater Britain.
The Coronation service in its present form contains many
more allusions to the imperial character conferred on the
monarch by the rite than it did when the English version
was first used on the accession of the Stuarts. Those
additions, of which the significance was never so apparent
as when they were heard in Westminster Abbey on August
9, 1902, date from the coronation of William III., that wise
monarch who, though he had in his veins as much Stuart
blood as either of his three predecessors, and was, moreover,
married to a Stuart, undid all the harm done by his uncles
and his grandfather to the monarchical cause and to the
imperial germ. His last public act had for its aim the
consolidation of the British Empire as it then existed,
330 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
when eight days before he died he sent a message to his
English Parliament expressing his desire to see it united
with that of Scotland.
Considerable as has been the share of the Scots in the
later development of the British Empire, the English
nation had no more need of their aid, at that period, to
encourage them in their imperial aspirations than in the
days of Elizabeth. The spirit of Drake and of Frobisher
was abroad in England more than a hundred years after
they and their royal mistress had gone. Just before the
House of Hanover succeeded to the Imperial Crown, one of
the greatest masters of our language,1 in the golden age
of English literature, writing of a typical London merchant,
of whom he related that there was not a point in the com-
pass but blowed home one of his ships, added that the
worthy citizen called the sea "the British Common." It
was only an incidental, unstudied touch in a portrait from
the hand of an artist, but it summed up by anticipation the
history of the British Empire in the eighteenth century.
The calm determination of our forefathers of that time to
be supreme at sea, which a little later in the century was
expressed by the poet Thomson, in his immortal refrain, had
a twofold result. While our naval supremacy prepared
the way for us to become the arbiters of Europe a hundred
years after the succession of the House of Hanover, our
superior familiarity on the element, called by the patriotic
merchant the " British Common," made it possible for us
to take early possession of the lands which 'now compose
the British Empire. A people which treated the sea as
1 Richard Steele. Spectator ; No. 2, March 2, 1710-11.
THE IMPERIAL CROWN 331
its own domain was not discouraged even when, in that
fateful eighteenth century, it lost its chief dependency
beyond the ocean. Before that century ended, the conquest
of Canada, the conquest of India, and the discovery of Aus-
tralia were destined to make up for, triply, the secession
of the United States. As the nineteenth century proceeded,
and the far-off colonies grew in population and in wealth,
the idea became current that they would follow the
example of the American settlements and one day demand
a separate existence. Statesmen for the most part believed
that before many years India and the Crown Colonies
would remain the only British possessions beyond the seas.
This idea gained strength when, with Queen Victoria,
came the new era of scientific and mechanical invention,
revolutionising the conditions of human existence and of
intercommunication. But at the coronation of the young
Queen she had assumed an emblem, which was to convert
into a binding influence those very forces which were
deemed likely to hasten the independence of the Colonies.
Hence it was, as we have seen in the foregoing pages,
that, when her illustrious son was crowned, the proud
words added in the course of generations to- the Form
and Order of Coronation attained their full significance.
When King Edward VII. was invested with the Imperial
Orb, that emblem of world-wide sway, as he held it in his
hand, had a new meaning unknown to the most powerful or
the most ambitious of his predecessors. When he was
enthroned and exhorted to stand firm and hold fast the seat
and state of Royal and Imperial Dignity, his throne was the
centre of the mightiest Empire the world had ever seen.
Surrounded by his loyal subjects from all parts of his
332 THE CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
domains, whose symbol of unity was the Imperial Crown
upon his head, King Edward was the chief figure of
a picture which realised the vision of the ancient seer
who said, " I will bring thy children from the east, and
gather thee from the west ; I will say to the north give up,
and to the south keep not back : bring my sons from far and
my daughters from the ends of the earth."
CHATEAU DE BELLEFONTAINE,
BIARRITZ,
September 6, 1902— June 6, 1903.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX I
LISTS OF THE PERSONS WHO WERE PRESENT AT OR WHO
WERE INVITED BY THE KING'S COMMAND, TO THE
CORONATION OF THEIR MAJESTIES KING EDWARD VII.
AND QUEEN ALEXANDRA AT WESTMINSTER ABBEY, ON
SATURDAY, AUGUST QTH, 1902, INCLUDING THE NAMES
OF THOSE WHO TOOK PART IN THE ROYAL PROCESSIONS
THROUGH THE STREETS AND WITHIN THE ABBEY.
[The following lists are in great measure based on those prepared by His
Majesty's command, under the direction of the Duke of Norfolk, Earl Marshal,
K.G., by Sir Robert Hobart, K.C.V.O., C.B., the Secretary of the Earl
Marshal's Office, who has a hereditary connection with Coronations, his father,
the Honourable and Very Reverend the Dean of Windsor, having as Registrar
of the Order of the Garter, taken part in the Coronations of George IV.,
William IV. and Queen Victoria. No such record has ever been made of
previous Coronations, and it is therefore hoped that the publication of these lists
may be of historical value, in the future, for the purposes of reference. In the
composition of the foregoing work, especially the portions of it relating to the
Coronation of Queen Victoria, the existence of similar lists would have been
of the highest utility, as it has been impossible to verify the presence of
some of the most important personages who are believed to have been present
at Westminster Abbey on June 28, 1838.
The lists drawn up in the Earl Marshal's Office have, in certain particulars,
been departed from, so that department is not responsible for any of the changes.
In most cases a note has been appended to each category to indicate any altera-
tions which have been made, of which the following are the most important. The
lists of the Royal Guests (both of the English Royal Family and of foreign
reigning Houses), of the Special Missions, and of the Diplomatic body present
at the Coronation, have been entirely re-fashioned, under the supervision of the
highest authorities. In those categories the names only of the persons who
actually attended the Coronation are given, with the exception of the chiefs
of the Special Missions who came to England in June but were unable to
remain for the postponed ceremony. The lists of the Peers and the Peeresses
have been taken from the Coronation Supplement to the London Gazette,
issued by the Earl Marshal on October 29, 1902, which likewise gives the
names only of those who were present, as far as they could be ascertained. A
considerable number of names have been added in other categories, which do not
appear in the lists prepared in the Earl Marshal's Office, including those of
the boys of Westminster School and of the singers and musicians who performed
the musical portion of the Coronation ceremony. Moreover, the names have
336 APPENDIX I
been added of a certain number of persons who, in the Earl Marshal's lists, are
referred to only by their official designations, as, for example, the representatives
of the Universities. Beyond the categories specified in this paragraph it has been
impossible to verify the presence of the persons whose names appear in the lists,
which, therefore, contain the names of a certain number who did not attend.
Consequently, outside the categories of Royal and Diplomatic guests, no names
have been omitted which appear in the Earl Marshal's lists. On the other
hand the names of a certain number of persons, owing to their official
functions, appear more than once. In the preparation of lists containing over
8000 names, errors are inevitable, and any which are indicated to Messrs
Methuen, 36 Essex Street, W.C., will receive careful attention in the revision
of future editions of this work.]
THE ROYAL PROCESSIONS TO AND WITHIN WESTMINSTER
ABBEY ON THE OCCASION OF THE CORONATION OF
THEIR MAJESTIES KING EDWARD VII. AND QUEEN
ALEXANDRA.
{The following account of the Royal Processions is taken from the Supplement to the
London Gazette of October 29, 1902.)
EARL MARSHAL'S OFFICE,
gtA August 1902.
Their Majesties, attended by Their Royal Households, preceded by the Princes and
Princesses of the Blood Royal, attended by the respective Households of Their Royal High-
nesses and also by the Royal Guests, proceeded this day to Westminster Abbey, in the
following order : —
Trumpeters, Royal Horse Guards.
Squadron and Band of ist Life Guards.
ist Troop of Escort of Royal Horse Guards.
DRESS CARRIAGES AND PAIRS CONVEYING THE ROYAL FAMILY AND FOREIGN ROYAL
PRINCES. (From Buckingham Palace at 10 a.m.)
first Carriage.
Field-Marshal His Royal Highness The Duke of Cambridge, K.G., K.T., K.P.,
G.C.B., G.C.H., G.C.S.I., G.C.M.G., G.C.I.E., G.C.V.O. (P.C.)
Her Royal Highness The Princess Frederica of Hanover (Baroness von Pawel
Rammingen).
Her Royal Highness The Princess Alice of Albany.
Second Carriage.
His Royal Highness The Prince Andrew of Greece.
His Royal Highness The Prince George of Greece, G.C.B.
Her Serene Highness The Princess Victoria Alice of Battenberg.
Her Grand Ducal Highness The Princess Louis of Battenberg,
Third Carriage.
His Highness The Prince Maurice of Battenberg.
His Highness The Prince Leopold of Battenberg.
His Highness The Prince Alexander of Battenberg.
Her Highness The Princess Victoria Eugenie of Battenberg.
Her Royal Highness The Princess Beatrice (Princess Henry of Battenberg).
APPENDIX I 337
Fourth. Carriage.
Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Albany.
Her Royal Highness The Princess Louise (Duchess of Argyll).
His Royal Highness The Crown Prince of Roumania, G.C.B.
Her Royal Highness The Crown Princess of Roumania.
Fifth Carriage.
Her Highness The Princess Louise Augusta of Schleswig-Holstein.
Her Highness The Princess Victoria of Schleswig-Holstein.
Her Royal Highness The Princess Victoria Patricia of Connaught.
Her Royal Highness The Princess Christian of Schleswig-Holstein.
Sixth Carriage.
Her Royal Highness The Princess Margaret of Connaught.
Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Connaught.
His Royal Highness The Grand Duke of Hesse, K.G., G.C.B.
His Royal Highness The Duke of Sparta, G.C.B.
Seventh Carriage.
His Royal Highness The Crown Prince of Denmark, K.G., G.C.B.
Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Sparta.
His Royal Highness The Prince Henry of Prussia, K.G., G.C.B.
Her Royal Highness The Princess Henry of Prussia.
Eighth Carriage (Six Black Horses).
The Lady Alexandra Duff.
Her Royal Highness The Princess Maud (Princess Charles of Denmark).
Her Royal Highness The Princess Victoria.
Her Royal Highness The Princess Louise (Duchess of Fife).
2nd Troop of Escort of Royal Horse Guards.
THE PRINCE OF WALES'S PROCESSION
(from York House at 10.15 a.m.).
Advanced Guard of His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales's Escort of
Royal Horse Guards.
First Carriage.
The Hon. Derek W. G. Keppel, C.M.G., M.V.O., Equerry>i
in Waiting
Commander Sir Charles L. Cust, Bart., C.M.G., M.V.O.,
, K.C.B.. K.C.M.G.,
Private Secretary
Lieut. -Colonel Hon. Sir W. H. P. Carington, K.C.V.O.,
C. B. , Comptroller and Treasurer
Second Carriage.
Lord Wenlock, G. C.S.I., G.C.I.E (P.C.), Lord of the Bedchamber to His Royal
Highness the Prince of Wales.
The Earl of Shaftesbury, Chamberlain \ „ R . „. ,
The Lady Mary Lygon, Woman of the Bedchamber >Th?Pri^7st n?Waff
The Lady Eva Dugdale, Woman of the Bedchamber / The Prlncess of w*les.
ist Troop of His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales's Escort of Royal Horse Guards.
Third Carriage.
Their Royal Highnesses THE PRINCE AND PRINCESS OF WALES.
2nd Troop of His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales's Escort of Royal Horse Guards.
Y
338 APPENDIX I
THE KING'S PROCESSION
(at ii a.m.).
Lieutenant-Colonel J. S. Cowans.
ADVANCED GUARD OF SOVEREIGN'S ESCORT OF ROYAL HORSE GUARDS.
THE KING'S BARGE-MASTER AND
12 WATERMEN.
DRESS CARRIAGES AND PAIRS CONVEYING THE HOUSEHOLD OF THEIR MAJESTIES :
First Carriage.
The Hon. V. A. Spencer, Page of Honour.
H. E. Festinge, Esq., Page of Honour.
The Hon. Mary Dyke, Maid of Honour.
The Hon. Sylvia Edwardes, Maid of Honour.
Second Carriage.
The Hon. Sidney Greville, C.V.O., C.B., Groom in Waiting.
The Lord Knollys, G.C.V.O., K.C.B., K.C.M.G., Private Secretary to The King.
General The Right Hon. Sir D. M. Probyn, G.C.B., G.C.V.O., K. C.S.I., «.«.,
Keeper of the Privy Purse.
Third Carriage.
The Viscount Colville of Culross, K.T. , G.C. V.O. , Lord Chamberlain to The Queen.
General Lord Chelmsford, G.C.B., Gold Stick in Waiting.
Admiral Sir M. Culme-Seymour, Bart., G.C.B., Vice-Admiral of the United
Kingdom.
The Hon. Charlotte Knollys, Woman of the Bedchamber.
Fourth Carriage.
The Viscount Churchill, K.C.V.O., Acting Lord Chamberlain (in the absence of
The Earl of Clarendon (P.C.), prevented by indisposition from carrying out his
duties as Lord Chamberlain).
The Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery, G.C. V.O. . Lord Steward.
The Dowager Countess of Lytton, Lady of the Bedchamber.
The Duchess of Buccleuch, Mistress of the Robes.
ACTING AIDES-DE-CAMP TO THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF:
Major Mahomed Ali Beg • Captain Raj Kunwar Lieut. -Colonel Nawab
Nawab Afsur-ud-Dowla Bir Bikram Singh Mahomed Aslam
Bahadur, C.I. E. of Sirmur, C.I.E. Khan Bahadur, C.I. E.
PERSONAL STAFF TO THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, viz. :
Major Major Hon. Captain Hon. Captain Lord
W.M.Sherston,D.S.O. G. J. Goschen, M.P. H. Dawnay, D.S.O. C. G. F. Fitzmaurice.
Co,on=lV,scoun, Harding, "tfSSgSl?1
HONORARY AIDE-DE-CAMP TO THE PRINCE OF WALES :
Major H. H. Maharaja Sir Raj Rajeshwar Siromani Sri Ganga Singh, Bahadur of
Bikanir, K.C.I.E.
THE AIDES-DE-CAMP TO THE KING, viz. :
(i) VOLUNTEER :
Colonel Lieutenant-Colonel Colonel Sir C. E. H.
E. Villiers. Earl of Stradbroke. Vincent, K.C.M.G., C.B., M.P.
Colonel Hon. Colonel Colonel
H. G. L. Crichton. Lord Clifford. J. Stevenson.
Colonel Colonel Colonel Colonel
Lord Blythswood. J. C. Cavendish. J. H. Rivett-Carnac, C.I.E. The Earl of Wemyss.
APPENDIX I
339
(2) YEOMANRY:
Colonel Colonel Colonel
The Earl of The Marquis of The Earl of
Scarborough. Hertford (P. C.) Kilmorey. K.P.
Colonel The Colonel Colonel The Earl of Colonel The Earl of
Duke of Beaufort Viscount Galway. Harewood. Haddington.
Colonel
Lord A. M. A. Percy.
Colonel
C. P. LeCornu, C.B.
Colonel
The Earl of March.
Colonel His Highness
Maharaja Sir Nripendra
Narayan Bhup Bahadur of
Cooch Behar, G.C.I.E., C.B.
Brevet-Colonel
H. I. W. Hamilton, D.S.O.
Colonel
H. V. Cowan.
(3) MILITIA:
Lieutenant-Colonel
Sir H. Munro, Bart.
Colonel
C. B. Bashford.
Colonel
Sir R. H. Ogilvy, Bart.
(4) HONORARY INDIAN :
Major-General His Highness
Maharaja Sir Pertab Singh
ofldar.G. C.S.I., K.C.B.
(5) REGULAR FORCES:
Brevet-Colonel
R. B. Adams, C.B., B.C.
Brevet-Colonel
C. W. Park.
Brevet-Colonel Brevet-Colonel Brevet-Colonel
J. Spens, C.B. H. C. O. Plumer, C.B. L. A. Hope, C.B.
Brevet-Colonel Brevet-Colonel Colonel
R. G. Broadwood, C.B. D. F. Lewis, C.B. H. Cooper, C.M.G
Colonel Colonel
W. Aitken, C.B. SirF. Howard, K.C.B., C.M.G.
Colonel
Earl Cawdor.
Colonel
W. G. Wood-Martin.
Colonel The Duke of
Northumberland, K.G. (P.C.)
Colonel His Highness
Maharaja Dhiraj Sir Madho
Rao Sindhia of Gwalior,
G.C.S.I.
Brevet-Colonel
W. P. Campbell.
Brevet-Colonel
T. D. Pilcher, C.B.
Brevet-Colonel
R. C. G. Mayne, C.B.
Colonel
. H. H. Mathias, C.B.
Brevet-Colonel
G. L. C. Money, C.B., D.S.O.
(6) NAVAL AND MARINE.
Colonel T. D. Bridge.
Captain Captain
R. F. O. Foote, W. H. B. Graham,
R.N., C.M.G. R.N.
Captain Captain
Sir Richard Poore,
Bart., R.N. R.N.
Major-General Admiral
Sir Alfred Gaselee, Sir E. Seymour,
G.C.I.E., K.C.B. G.C.B., O.M.
Colonel W. Campbell.
Captain
C. R. Arbuthnot,
R.N
Captain
F. C. B. Bridgeman, W. Des V. Hamilton,
R.N.
Captain
A. C. Corry,
R.N.
Commodore
Hon. H. Lambton,
R.N., C.V.O., C.B.
General
Viscount Kitchener,
G.C.B., O.M., G. C.M.G.
THE HEAD-QUARTERS STAFF OF THE ARMY
Major Brevet-Major
E. E. Carter, C.M.G. F. R. F. Boileau.
Brevet- Brevet-
Lieutenant-Colonel
Major Major
L. A. M. Stopford. W. Adye.
Lieutenant-Colonel Vet. Lieut. -Colonel
E. A. Altham, J. A. Nunn,
C.M.G. C.I.E., D.S.O.
Colonel Colonel
P. H. N. Lake. F. S. Robb.
Colonel Colonel
C.B.', C.M.G. W. E. Franklyn, C.B. F. W. Benson, C.B.
Colonel Colonel Colonel
H. D. Hutchinson. R. A. Montgomery, C.B. C. E. Beckett, C.B.
Colonel Colonel Major-General
C. H. Bagot, C.B. R. Auld, C.B. Lord Chesham, K.C.B. (P.C.)
Lieutenant-Colonel
E. J. Granet.
Colonel
C. E. Heath.
Colonel E. O. Hay.
W. R. Robertson, D.S.O.
Colonel
R. C. Maxwell, C.B.
Colonel J. K. Trotter,
340
APPENDIX I
Major-General
F. G. Slade, C.B.
Major-General
H. C. Borrett.
Lieutenant-General
Sir W. G. Nicholson, K.C.B.
Lieutenant-General
Sir C. M. Clarke, Bart., G.C.B.
Major-General
H. F. Grant, C.B.
Surgeon-General
SirW. Taylor, K.C.B.
Lieutenant-General
Lord W. F. E. Seymour
Major-General
Sir A. E.Turner, K.C.B.
Major-General
A. S. Wynne, C.B.
General Sir
R. Harrison, K.C.B., C.M.G.
Lieutenant-General
SirT. Kelly Kenny, K.C.B.
Field-Marshal Earl Roberts, K.G., K.P.. G.C.B., O.M.. G.C.S.I., G.C.I. E., S.S. (P.C.),
Commander-in-Chief.
His MAJESTY'S MARSHALMEN.
25 Yeomen of the Guard (who walked to the Abbey only, in ranks of four, and were
relieved by 25 more for the return route).
Major C. Wray, Equerry to His Royal Highness The Prince Christian of
Schleswig-Holstein.
THE EXTRA EQUERRIES TO THE KING.
Lord Captain
Marcus Beresford, M.V.O.
Lieutenant-Colonel
A. E. W. Count Gleichen, C.V.O., C.M.G., D.S.O.
Hon. A. Greville.
Major-General
J. C. Russell.
THE EQUERRIES-IN-ORDINARY TO THE KING.
The Hon. T. H. Ward. Captain F. E. G. Ponsonby, Captain G. L. Holford,
C.V.O. C.V.O., C.I.E.
Lieutenant-Colonel Lieutenant-Colonel
Hon. H. C. Legge, C.V.O. A. Davidson, C.V.O., C,B.
His Highness
Prince Albert of
Schleswig-Holstein,
G.C.B., G.C.V.O.
His Royal Highness
Prince Christian of
Schleswig-Holstein,
K.G., G.C.V.O. (P.C.)
ESCORT OF COLONIAL CAVALRY.
ESCORT OF INDIAN CAVALRY.
His Royal Highness
Prince Charles of
Denmark,
G.C.B., G.C.V.O.
FIRST DIVISION OF SOVEREIGN'S ESCORT OF ROYAL HORSE GUARDS.
Fhe State Coach
Field-Marshal His Royal
Highness The Duke of
Connaught, K.G., K.T.,
K.P., G.C.B., G.C.S.I.,
conveying
G.C.M.G., G.C.I.E.,
The
Major
A. Vaughan Lee,
Royal Horse Guards,
Captain of Escort.
THEIR MAJESTIES
King and Queen.
The Standard.
G.C.V.O.
Lieut. -Colonel
Lord Binning,
Royal Horse Guards,
Field Officer of Escort.
2nd Lieutenant
His Royal Highness Prince
Arthur of Connaught,
K.G., G.C.V.O.
Major-General
W. H. Mackinnon, C.B.
The Duke of Buccleuch,
K.G., K.T. (P.C.),
Captain-General of the Royal
Archer Guard of Scotland.
followed by
Earl Waldegrave (P.C.),
Captain of the
Yeomen of the Guard.
Major-General
Sir H. Trotter, K.C.V.O.,
Chief Staff Officer.
The Duke of Portland,
K.G., G.C.V.O. (P.C.).
Master of the Horse.
APPENDIX I 341
Colonel Captain Major-General Major-General
J. F. Brocklehurst. Hon. S. Fortescue, Sir S. de A. C. Clarke, Sir H. P. Ewart,
C.V.O., C.B.. C.V.O.,C.M.G.,R.N., K.C.V.O., C.M.G., K.C.B., K.C.V.O.,
Equerry in Equerry in Equerry in Crown Equerry.
Waiting to Waiting to Waiting to
The Queen. The King. The King.
The Field Officer in Brigade Waiting, The Silver Stick,
Colonel F. A. Graves-Sawle, Colonel T. C. P. Galley, M.V.O.,
Coldstream Guards. ist Life Guards.
Adjutant Aide-de-Camp to Silver Stick Adjutant
in Brigade Waiting. His Royal Highness Captain P. B. Cookson,
Major J. R. Hall, The Duke of Connaught, ist Life Guards.
Coldstream Guards. Major E. F. Clayton,
Scots Guards.
ROYAL GROOMS.
REAR DIVISION OF SOVEREIGN'S ESCORT OF ROYAL HORSE GUARDS.
RESERVE SQUADRON OF 2ND LIFE GUARDS.
THE ROYAL PROCESSIONS WITHIN WESTMINSTER
ABBEY.
PROCESSION OF PRINCES AND PRINCESSES OF THE BLOOD ROYAL.
T. M. Joseph-Watkin, Esq., G. Ambrose Lee, Esq.
Portcullis Pursuivant. Bluemantle Pursuivant.
The Right Hon. Sir Spencer C. B. Ponsonby-Fane, G.C.B. (P.C.).
Her Royal Highness the Princess Louise, Duchess of Fife, with Lady Alexandra Duff ;
her Train borne by
The Lady Cecilia Leila Webbe.
Her Royal Highness the Princess Victoria ;
her Train borne by
The Hon. Mrs D. Keppel.
Her Royal Highness the Princess Maud (Princess Charles of Denmark) ;
her Train borne by
Miss Carstensen ;
attended by
Colonel Henry Knollys, M.V.O. (Comptroller).
Her Royal Highness the Princess Helena, Princess Christian of Schleswig-Holstein ;
her Train borne by
The Lady Edward Cavendish ;
her Coronet borne by
Major Evan Martin.
Her Highness the Princess Victoria of Schleswig-Holstein ;
attended by Miss Emily Loch.
Her Highness the Princess Louise Augusta of Schleswig-Hclstein ;
attended by
The Hon. Mary Hughes and Colonel George Grant Gordon, C.V.O., C.B.
Her Royal Highness the Princess Louise, Duchess of Argyll ;
attended by
The Lady Sophia Eliza Macnamara, Lady in Waiting,
and
^ Major N. W. Cuthbertson, Equerry.
Her Royal Highness the Princess Beatrice, Princess Henry of Battenberg ;
her Train borne by Miss Minnie Cochrane, Lady in Waiting ;
and attended by Colonel Lord William Cecil, M.V.O., Comptroller.
342 APPENDIX I
Her Highness the Princess Victoria Eugenie of Battenberg.
His Highness the Prince Alexander of Battenberg.
His Highness the Prince Leopold of Battenberg.
His Highness the Prince Maurice of Battenberg.
Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Connaught and Strathearn ;
attended by
The Hon. Mrs Alfred Egerton, Lady in Waiting,
and
Captain Sir Maurice Fitzgerald, Bart.
Her Royal Highness Her Royal Highness
the Princess Victoria Patricia ; the Princess Margaret ;
attended by attended by
Mrs Clayton. The Lady Sybil Evelyn de Vere Lascelles.
Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Albany ;
attended by
The Hon. Mrs Richard Moreton, Lady in Waiting, and Sir Robert Hawthorn Collins.
K.C.B., Comptroller.
Her Royal Highness the Princess Alice of Albany ;
attended by
Miss Heron Maxwell.
Her Royal Highness the Princess Augusta,
Grand Duchess of Mecklenburg-Strelitz ;
attended by
Baroness de Heyden and
Hugo Wemyss, Esq.
His Highness the Duke Adolf Friedrich of Mecklenburg-Strelitz, G.C.B.
Field-Marshal His Royal Highness the Duke of Cambridge, K.G., K.T., K.P., G.C.B..
G.C.H., G.C.S.I.. G.C.M.G., G.C.I.E., G.C.V.O. (P.C.);
attended by
Colonel Augustus Charles Frederick FitzGeorge, C.B., Comptroller and Equerry, and
Rear- Admiral Adolphus Augustus Frederick FitzGeorge, C.V.O.
Her Royal Highness the Princess Frederica, Baroness von Pawel-Rammingen ;
attended by
Countess Bremer, Lady in Waiting, and Atherton Byrom, Esq., Equerry.
Her Grand Ducal Highness Princess Louise of Battenberg ;
accompanied by
Her Serene Highness Princess Victoria Alice of Battenberg ;
attended by
Miss Nona Kerr and Sir A. Condie Stephen, K.C.M.G., K.C.V.O., C.B.
PROCESSION OF ROYAL GUESTS AND THEIR SUITES.
On arrival at the West Door the Royal Guests were received by Major-General Sir
Arthur Edward Augustus Ellis, K.C.V.O., C.S.I., and conducted to the Choir, where they
were shown to the seats provided for Their Royal Highnesses by Colonel the Hon. Sir
William James Colville, K.C.V.O., C.B., Master of His Majesty's Ceremonies, R. F. Synge,
Esq., C.M.G., Deputy Marshal of His Majesty's Ceremonies, and D. Tupper, Esq., M.V.O. ,
Assistant Comptroller in the Lord Chamberlain's Department.
His Royal Highness the Grand Duke of Hesse, K.G., G.C.B. ;
attended by
Colonel Sir Robert Nigel Fitzhardinge Kingscote, K.C.B.
Hon. Henry Julian Stonor, M.V.O.
Colonel von Wachter, Acting-General Aide-de-Camp.
Captain Kraemer, Aide-de-Camp.
Their Royal Highnesses the Prince and Princess Henry of Prussia ;
attended by
Admiral of the Fleet the Earl of Clanwilliam, G.C.B., K.C.M.G.
Lieutenant-Colonel the Right Hon. Sir F. I. Edwards, G.C.V.O.. K.C.B. (P.C.)
Oberhofmeisterin Freifrau von Seckendorff.
Hofmarschall Vice-Admiral Freiherr von Seckendorff, K.C.V.O.
APPENDIX I 343
His Royal Highness the Crown Prince of Denmark, K.G., G.C.B. ;
attended by
Lord Kenyon.
Major-General John Palmer Brabazon, C.V.O., C.B.
His Excellency Count Joachim Moltke, G.C.V.O., Comptroller.
Captain Boeck, M.V.O., Aide-de-Camp.
Their Royal Highnesses the Duke and Duchess of Sparta ;
attended by
Admiral Sir Henry Frederick Stephenson, K.C.B.
Lieutenant Albert Edward Stanley Clarke, M.V.O.
Mademoiselle Contostavlos.
Lieutenant-Colonel Agamemnon Pallis.
Their Royal Highnesses the Crown Prince and Crown Princess of Roumania ;
attended by
Colonel Lord Edward William Pelham-Clinton, G.C.V.O., K.C.B.
Madame Romniceano.
His Excellency General Robesco.
Major Demetresco.
His Royal Highness Prince George of Greece, G.C.B. ;
attended by
Captain Hon. Alwyn Henry Fulke Greville.
Captain Carpouny.
His Royal Highness Prince Andrew of Greece ;
attended by
Montague Eliot, Esq.
PROCESSION OF THEIR ROYAL HIGHNESSES THE PRINCE
AND PRINCESS OF WALES.
On arrival at the West Door Their Royal Highnesses the Prince and Princess of
Wales were met by the Ladies and Gentlemen in attendance. H.R.H. The Prince of
Wales was conducted to his seat in front of the Peers, and H.R.H. The Princess of Wales
to the Royal Box, where Her Royal Highness was joined by Their Royal Highnesses Prince
Edward and Prince George of Wales.
PROCESSION OF THEIR ROYAL HIGHNESSES THE PRINCE AND PRINCESS
OF WALES.
William A. Lindsay, Esq., K.C., Charles H. Athffl, Esq.
Windsor Herald. Richmond Herald.
Lieutenant-Colonel Arthur Collins, C.B., M.V.O.
Her Royal Highness His Royal Highness the PRINCE OF WALES,
the PRINCESS OF WALES K.G., K.T., K.P., G.C.M.G., G.C.V.O.(P.C.)
in a Robe of Estate of Purple Velvet, in his Robes of Estate ;
wearing a his Train borne by his Two Pages,
Circlet of Gold on her Head ; Viscount Wolmer
her Train borne by and
Lady Eva Sarah Louisa Dugdale, Hon. Evelyn Hugh John Boscawen.
Lady Mary Lygon, The Coronet of His Royal Highness
Bedchamber Women in Waiting. borne by
The Coronet of Her Royal Highness Lieutenant-Colonel Hon.
borne by the Sir William Henry Peregrine Carington,
Earl of Shaftesbury, Chamberlain ; K.C.V.O., C.B.,
his Coronet carried by his page, Comptroller and Treasurer.
Lord Erskine. In attendance on His Royal Highness
Lieutenant-Colonel Sir Arthur John Bigge, Lord Wenlock, G.C.S.I., G.C.I. E. (P.C.),
G.C.V.O., K.C.B., K.C.M.G., Lord of the Bedchamber;
Private Secretary ;
344 APPENDIX I
Commander Godfrey-Faussett, Commander
R.N., Sir Charles Leopold Cust, Bart.,
Captain Viscount Crichton, D.S.O., C.M.G., M.V.O., R.N.,
Equerries. Hon. Derek William George Keppel,
C.M.G., M.V.O.,
Equerries.
Major Maharaj Kunwar Doulat Singh of Idar,
Honorary Aide-de-Camp.
PROCESSION OF THEIR MAJESTIES KING EDWARD VII.
AND QUEEN ALEXANDRA
THEIR MAJESTIES arrived at the Abbey at eleven-thirty o'clock.
On arrival at the West Entrance of the Abbey Their Majesties were received by the Great
Officers of State, the Noblemen bearing the Regalia, and the Bishops carrying the Patina, the
Chalice, and the Bible.
Their Royal Highnesses the Duke of Connaught, Prince Arthur of Connaught, Prince
Charles of Denmark, Prince Christian, and Prince Albert of Schleswig-Holstein, together
with the Peers and others who arrived with Their Majesties, but who did not form part of the
following Procession, passed to their seats in the Abbey, accompanied by the Gentlemen in
attendance on Their Royal Highnesses.
The Ladies of Her Majesty's Household and the Officers of the Royal Household, to
whom Duties were not assigned in the Solemnity, passed to the places prepared for them
respectively.
Their Majesties then advanced up the Nave into the Choir, the Choristers in the Orchestra
singing the Anthem, " I was glad when they said unto me, we will go into the House of the
Lord," &c.
THE PROCEEDING
FROM THE WEST DOOR OF THE ABBEY INTO THE CHOIR.
Chaplains in Ordinary :
Rev. the Hon. Leonard F. Tyrwhitt, M.A. Rev. Canon Clement Smith, M.A.
Rev. Canon T. Teignmouth Shore, M.A. Rev. Canon Robert C. Moberley, D.D.
Rev. Prebendary Edgar C. S. Gibson, D.D. Rev. Canon James Fleming, B.D.
Rev. John H. J. Ellison, M.A. Rev. Canon Alfred Ainger, M.A.
Rev. James Williams Adams, B.A. Rev. William R. Jolley, M.A.
Rev. Canon John N. Dalton, C.M.G., M.A. Very Rev. Frederick W. Farrar, D.D., Dean
of Canterbury.
Sub-Dean of the Chapels Royal, Rev. James Edgar Sheppard, D. D.
Rev. Canon Frederick A. J. Hervey, M.A., Very Rev. Philip F. Eliot, D.D.,
M.V.O. Dean of Windsor.
Prebendaries of Westminster :
Right Rev. Bishop Welldon, D.D. Rev. Canon H. Hensley Henson, B.D.
Rev. Canon J. Armitage Robinson, D.D. Ven. Archdeacon Wilberforce, D.D.
Rev. Canon Robinson Duckworth, D.D.
Dean of Westminster :
Very Rev. George G. Bradley, D.D.
Athlone Pursuivant, Fitzalan Pursuivant, Unicorn Pursuivant,
Henry C. Blake, Esq. Extraordinary, John Home Stevenson, Esq.
Gerald Woods Wollaston, Esq.
March Pursuivant, Carrick Pursuivant,
Captain G. S. C. Swinton. W. R. Macdonald, Esq.
APPENDIX I 345
Officers of the Orders of Knighthood.
Sir William A. Baillie-Hamilton, Sir John Bramston, G. C. Barrington, Esq., C.B.,
K.C.M.G., C.B., G.C.M.G., C.B.. Gentleman Usher of the
Officer of Arms of St Michael Registrar to the Order Scarlet Rod.
and St George. of St Michael and
St George.
Hon. Allan David Murray, Sir William J. Cunningham, K. C.S.I.,
Gentleman Usher of the Green Rod. Secretary to the Order of the Star of India.
Major F. W. Lambart, Sir Duncan A. Dundas Campbell, Bart.,
Secretary to the Order of St Patrick. Secretary to the Order of the Thistle.
Rothesay Herald, Albany Herald,
Francis J. Grant, Esq. Robert S. Livingstone, Esq.
Comptroller of the Household, Treasurer of the Household,
Viscount Valentia, C.B., M.V.O., M.P. Victor Cavendish, Esq., M.P.
The Standard of Ireland, The Standard of Scotland,
borne by borne by
The Right Hon. the O'Conor Don (P.C.) Henry Scrymgeour Wedderburn, Esq.,
Hereditary Standard Bearer of Scotland.
The Standard of England
borne by
Frank S. Dymoke, Esq.
The Union Standard
borne by
The Duke of Wellington, K.G., G.C.V.O. ;
his Coronet carried by his Page,
Lord Gerald Wellesley.
The Vice-Chamberlain of the Household,
Sir Alexander Fuller- Acland-Hood, Bart., M.P.
The Keeper of the Crown Jewels, General Sir Hugh Gough, G.C.B., 8.C., bearing on a
cushion the two Ruby Rings and the Sword for the Offering.
The Four Knights of the Order of the Garter appointed to hold the Canopy for the
King's Anointing :
Earl Cadogan, K.G. (P.C.) ; Earl of Rosebery, K.G., K.T. (P.C.);
his Coronet carried by his Page, his Coronet carried by his Page,
Hon. Thomas Coventry. Lord Alistair Leveson-Gower.
Earl of Derby, K.G., G.C.B. (P.C.) ; Earl Spencer, K.G. (P.C.) ;
his Coronet carried by his Page, his Coronet carried by his Page,
Edward Harding, Esq. Albert E. J. Spencer, Esq.
The Acting Lord Chamberlain The Lord Steward of the Household,
of the Household, Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery,
Viscount Churchill, K.C.V.O. ; G.C.V.O. (P.C.) ;
his Coronet carried by his Page, his Coronet carried by his Page,
George Villiers, Esq. Hon. George Sidney Herbert.
The Lord Privy Seal, The Lord President of the Council,
The Right Hon. A. J. Balfour (P.C.) ; The Duke of Devonshire, K.G. (P.C.) ;
attended by his Coronet carried by his Page,
Robert Cecil, Esq. Edward Cavendish, Esq.
The Lord Chancellor of Ireland,
LordAshbourne(/>.C.);
attended by his Purse-bearer, Hon. Edward Gibson ; his Coronet carried by his Page,
Hon. Alec. Cadogan.
The Lord Archbishop of York, D.D. (P.C.) ;
attended by
Eric Maclagan, Esq.
The Lord High Chancellor,
Earl of Halsbury (P.C.);
attended by his Purse-bearer, Edward Preston, Esq. ; his Coronet carried by his Page,
Viscount Tiverton.
346
APPENDIX I
The Lord Archbishop of Canterbury, D.D. (P.C.) ;
attended by
F. C. Temple, Esq. W. Temple, Esq.
Portcullis Pursuivant,
Thomas M. Joseph Watkin,
Esq.
The Ivory Rod with the
Dove, borne by the
Earl of Gosford, K.P. ;
his Coronet carried by his
Page,
Sydney Herbert, Esq.
Sergeant-at-Arms,
Richard R. Holmes,
Esq., C.V.O.
Windsor Herald,
William A. Lindsay,
Esq., K.C.
THE QUEEN'S REGALIA.
The Lord Chamberlain of
Her Majesty's Household,
Viscount Colville (of Culross),
K.T., G. C.V.O. ; his Coronet
carried by his Page,
Charles Alec. Colville, Esq.
Her Majesty's Crown,
borne by the
Duke of Roxburghe, K.T.,
M.V.O. ; his Coronet carried
by his Page,
Randolph G. Wilson, Esq.
Rouge Dragon Pursuivant,
Everard Green,
Esq.
The Sceptre with the Cross,
borne by Lord Harris,
G.C.S.I..G.C.I.E. ;
his Coronet carried by his
Page, Hon. George
St Vincent Harris.
Sergeant-at-Arms,
Captain
Sir W. B. Goldsmith, Knt.
THE QUEEN
The Bishop in her Royal Robes, The Bishop
of Her Majesty's Train of
Oxford, D.D. borne by the Norwich, D.D.
Duchess of Buccleuch,
Mistress of the Robes,
assisted by
J. N. Bigge, Esq. Viscount Torrington.
Earl of Macclesfield. Marquis of Stafford.
Hon. Edward Lascelles. Lord Claud Hamilton.
Hon. Robert Palmer. Hon. Arthur Anson.
The Coronet of the Mistress of the Robes, carried by her Page,
David John Scott, Esq.
Ladies of the Bedchamber in Waiting, viz. : —
Countess of Gosford.
Lady Suffield.
Women of the Bedchamber, viz. : —
Hon. Mrs Charles Hardinge.
Hon. Charlotte Knollys.
Maids of Honour, viz. : —
Hon. Mary Dyke.
Hon. Dorothy Vivian.
Colonel John Fielden Brocklehurst, C.V.O., C.B.
(Equerry).
Bluemantle Pursuivant, Richmond Herald,
G. Ambrose Lee, Esq. Charles H. Athill, Esq.
THE KING'S REGALIA.
Countess of Antrim.
Countess Dowager of Lytton.
Lady Emily Kingscote.
Lady Alice Stanley.
Hon. Sylvia Edwardes.
Hon. Violet Vivian.
Earl de Grey, K. C.V.O.
(Treasurer).
Rouge Croix Pursuivant,
George W. Marshall, Esq.
St Edward's Staff,
borne by
Earl Carrington, G.C.M.G. (P.C.);
his Coronet carried by his Page,
Viscount Wendover.
The Sceptre with the Cross,
borne by the
Duke of Argyll,
K.T., G.C.M.G., G.C.V.O. (P.C.),
Hereditary Master of His Majesty's
Household in Scotland ;
his Coronet carried by his Page.
Ivor Campbell, Esq.
APPENDIX I
347
A Golden Spur,
borne by the
Lord Grey de Ruthyn ;
his Coronet carried by his Page,
Lord Colum Stuart.
The Third Sword,
borne by Field- Marshal
Viscount Wolseley, G.C.B.,
K.P., O.M., G.C.M.G. (P.C.) ;
his Coronet carried by
his Page,
Edwin J. Wolseley, Esq.
Norroy King of
Arms, in his Tabard
and Collar, and
Crown in his hand,
H. Farnham Burke, Esq.
Somerset Herald,
Acting for Norroy.
A Golden Spur,
borne by the
Earl of Loudoun ;
his Coronet carried by his Page,
Reginald Hastings, Esq.
Curtana, The Second Sword,
borne by the borne by Field-Marshal
Duke of Grafton, Earl Roberts, K.G.,
K.G., C.B. ; K.P., G.C.B., O.M., G.C.S.I.,
his Coronet carried by G.C.I. E., $.C. (P.C.) ;
his Page, his Coronet carried by
Charles Fitzroy, Esq. his Page,
Reginald Sherston, Esq.
Lyon King of Clarenceux King of
Arms, in his Tabard Arms, in his Tabard
and Collar, and
his Crown and his Crown and Crown in his hand,
Sceptre, Sceptre, Alfred S. Scott-
Sir Arthur E. Sir J. Balfour Gatty, Esq.,
Vicars, Knt., C.V.O. Paul, Knt. York Herald,
Acting for Clarenceux.
Deputy Garter King of Gentleman Usher of the
Arms, in his Tabard and Black Rod,
Collar, carrying his Crown Gen. Sir Michael Biddulph,
and Sceptre, G.C.B.
William H. Weldon, Esq.
Ulster King of
Arms, in his Tabard
and Collar, carrying and Collar, carrying
The Lord Mayor of London,
in his Robe, Collar
and Jewel,
bearing the City Mace,
Rt. Hon.
Sir Joseph C. Dimsdale, Bart.
The Lord Great Chamberlain of England,
Marquess of Cholmondeley (P. C. ),
his Coronet carried by his Page,
Lord George Hugo Cholmondeley
The High Constable of Ireland,
the Duke of Abercorn, K.G., C.B. (P.C.);
his Coronet carried by his Page,
Geoffrey Lambton, Esq.
The Lord High Steward of Ireland,
Earl of Shrewsbury,
with his White Staff;
his Coronet carried by his Page,
Gilbert Talbot. Esq.
The Earl Marshal of England,
The Duke of Norfolk,
K.G. (P.C.),
with his Baton,
attended by his two Pages,
Henry Stewart, and
Lyulph Howard, Esquires.
The Sword of State,
borne by the
Marquess of Londonderry,
K.G. (P.C.) ;
his Coronet carried by
his Page,
Wentworth Beaumont, Esq.
The Sceptre with the Dove,
borne by the
EarlofLucan, K.P. ;
his Coronet carried by
his Page,
David Bingham, Esq.
The Patina,
borne by the Bishop ot
Ely, D.D.
The High Constable of Scotland,
the Earl of Errol, K.T.. C.B. ;
his Coronet carried by his Page,
Christian Seymour H. Combe, Esq.
The Lord High Steward of Scotland,
Earl of Crawford, K.T., as Deputy to His
Royal Highness The Duke of Rothesay
(the Prince of Wales) ;
his Coronet carried by his Page,
G. Humphrey Lindsay, Esq.
The Lord High Constable of
England,
the Duke of Fife,
K.T., G.C.V.O. (P.O.),
with his Staff,
attended by his two Pages,
Eric Mackenzie, and
Angus Cuningham-Graham,
Esquires.
The Orb,
borne by the
Duke of Somerset ;
his Coronet carried by
his Page,
Harold Sargent, Esq.
St Edward's Crown,1
borne by the
DukeofMarlborough, K.G. (P.C.),
Lord High Steward,
attended by his two Pages,
Hon. Rupert Anson, and
Ernald Anson, Esq.
The Bible,
borne by the Bishop of
London, D.D. (P.C.)
The Chalice,
borne by the Bishop of
Winchester, D.D.
See note on p. 296.
348 APPENDIX I
THE KING |?
£ The Bishop in his Royal Crimson The Bishop
. of Robe of State, of
< g Bath and Wells, D.D. wearing the Collar Durham, D.D. H —
•B % of the Garter.
o ~ on his Head the Cap O c
ro § of State,
^•g| His Majesty's Train £ ~
fc § g borne by 3 3 =r
& - Earl of Portarlington. Marquess Conyngham. §31
(Q v Duke of Leinstec. Earl of Caledon. t> 3
•a O Lord Vernon. Lord Somers. £ q
£ g H. E. Festinge, Esq. Hon. V. A. Spencer. j o
•§ H assisted by Lord Suffield, G. C. V.O., K.C.B. (P.C.), § £
« the Master of the Robes,
OT his Coronet carried by his Page, B
Hon. C. T. Mills ; "
and followed by the Groom of the Robes, 3
H. D. Erskine, Esq., C.V.O.
Admiral The Duke of Portland, General Lord Chelmsford,
Sir Michael Culme-Seymour, K.G., G. C.V.O. (P.C.), G.C.B., Gold Stick in
Bart., G.C.B., G. C.V.O., Master of the Horse ; Waiting ; his Coronet
Vice- Admiral of the his Coronet carried by his Page, carried by his Page,
United Kingdom. the Marquis of Tichfield. Hon. Oscar Guest.
The Duke of Buccleuch, K.G., K.T. (P.C.),
Captain-General of the Royal Archer Guard of Scotland,
and Gold Stick of Scotland ;
his Coronet carried by his Page,
Lord Whitchester.
General Sir A. Gaselee. Admiral General Viscount Kitchener,
G.C.I.E., K.C.B. Sir Edward Seymour, G.C.B., O.M., G.C.M.G.;
G. C. B. , O . M. his Coronet carried by
his Page,
Julian Grenfell, Esq.
Earl Waldegrave (P. C. ), Lord Belper (P. C. ),
Captain of the Yeomen Captain of the Hon. Corps of
of the Guard ; Gentlemen-at-Arms ;
his Coronet carried by his Page, his Coronet carried by his Page,
Hon. John Eliot. Hon. Algernon H. Strutt.
The Groom in Waiting, Hon. Sidney Greville, C.V.O., C.B.
Lord Knollys, General the Right Hon. Sir D. M. Probyn,
G.C.V.O., K.C.B., K.C.M.G., G.C.V.O., K.C.B., K.C.S.I., B.C. (P.C.),
Private Secretary to the King ; Keeper of His Majesty's Privy Purse,
his Coronet carried by his Page,
Hon. Edward Knollys.
Major-General Sir Arthur Ellis, Major-General Sir Henry Ewart.
K.C.V.O., C.S.I., K.C.B., K.C.V.O.,
Comptroller Lord Chamberlain's Department. Crown Equerry.
Captain the Hon. Major-General
Seymour Fortescue, C.V.O., C.M.G., Sir Stanley de A. C. Clarke, K.C.V.O., C.M.G.,
Equerry to the King. Equerry to the King.
Colonel T. Galley, M.V.O., Silver Stick in Waiting.
Colonel R. Ellison, Colonel R. Hennell, D.S.O.,
Ensign of the Yeomen of the Guard. Lieutenant of the Yeomen of the Guard.
Captain Houston French, Major E. H. Elliot, Lieut.-Col. Hon. F. Colborne,
Col. F. B. de Sales La Terriere, Clerk of the Cheque, Lieut.-Col. C. D. Patterson,
Exons of the to the Exons of the
Yeomen of the Guard. Yeomen of the Guard. Yeomen of the Guard.
Twenty Yeomen of the Guard.
The Standards were handed to the Barons of the Cinque Ports at the entrance to the Choir.
APPENDIX I 349
HIS MAJESTY'S GUESTS AT WESTMINSTER ABBEY.
No. i.— MEMBERS OF THE ROYAL FAMILY OF GREAT BRITAIN AND
IRELAND, AND RELATIVES OF THE ROYAL FAMILY.
Their Royal Highnesses The Prince and Princess of Wales.
Their Royal Highnesses Prince Edward and Prince Albert of Wales.1
Her Royal Highness The Princess Victoria.
Her Royal Highness The Princess Louise, Duchess of Fife, and The Duke of Fife.
Their Royal Highnesses The Prince Charles of Denmark and The Princess Maud, Princess
Charles of Denmark.
Their Royal Highnesses The Duke and Duchess of Connaught and Strathearn.
His Royal Highness The Prince Arthur of Connaught.
Their Royal Highnesses The Princesses Margaret and Victoria Patricia of Connaught.
Their Royal Highnesses The Prince Christian of Schleswig-Hplstein and The Princess Helena,
Princess Christian of Schleswig-Holstein, and Their Highnesses The Princess Victoria
and The Prince Albert of Schleswig-Holstein.
Her Highness The Princess Louise Augusta of Schleswig-Holstein.
Her Royal Highness The Princess Louise, Duchess of Argyll, and The Duke of Argyll.
Her Royal Highness The Princess Beatrice, Princess Henry of Battenberg, and Their Highnesses
The Princess Ena and The Princes Alexander, Leopold and Maurice of Battenberg.
Her Royal Highness The Princess Beatrice of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.
Their Royal Highnesses The Duchess of Albany and The Princess Alice of Albany.
His Royal Highness The Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, Duke of Albany.
His Royal Highness The Duke of Cambridge.
Her Royal Highness The Princess Frederica, Baroness von Pawel Rammingen and The
Baron von Pawel Rammingen.
Her Royal Highness The Grand Duchess of Mecklenburg-Strelitz and His Highness The
Duke Adolf- Friedrich of Mecklenburg-Strelitz.
Her Grand Ducal Highness The Princess Louis of Battenberg and Her Serene Highness
Princess Victoria Alice of Battenberg.
Their Serene Highnesses The Duke and Duchess of Teck.
Their Serene Highnesses The Prince Francis and The Prince Alexander of Teck.
Her Serene Highness The Princess Victor of Hohenlohe-Langenburg and The Countesses
Feodore, Helena and Valda Gleichen and The Count Gleichen.
MEMBERS OF FOREIGN REIGNING FAMILIES.
His Royal Highness The Grand Duke of Hesse.
Their Royal Highnesses The Prince and Princess Henry of Prussia.
His Royal Highness The Crown Prince of Denmark.
Their Royal Highnesses The Duke and Duchess of Sparta.
Their Royal Highnesses The Crown Prince and The Crown Princess of Roumania.
Their Royal Highnesses Prince George and Prince Andrew of Greece.
His Imperial Highness The Grand Duke Michael Michaelovitch of Russia and Countess Torby.
1 In the Supplement to the London Gazette, October 29, 1902, in which alone of the
Earl Marshal's lists the names of the young Princes of Wales are mentioned, the younger
was described as Prince George of Wales. But His Royal Highness is known as Prince
Albert of Wales.
350 APPENDIX I
No. 2. — LIST OF THE CHIEFS OF THE SPECIAL EMBASSIES SENT TO
REPRESENT FOREIGN POWERS AT THE CORONATION WHEN ARRANGED
FOR JUNE 26, 1902, WHO ON ACCOUNT OF ITS POSTPONEMENT HAD
TO LEAVE ENGLAND WITHOUT FULFILLING THEIR MISSION. (!N
ALPHABETICAL ORDER.)1
AUSTRIA-HUNGARY.
His Imperial and Royal Highness The Archduke Francis Ferdinand.
BAVARIA.
His Royal Highness The Prince Leopold of Bavaria.
BELGIUM.
His Royal Highness The Prince Albert of Belgium.
CHINA.
His Imperial Highness Prince Cb6n.
CORE A.
His Imperial Highness Yi Chai-kak, Prince of Eui-Yang.
EGYPT.
His Highness The Prince Mohamed Ali Pacha.
FRANCE.
His Excellency Vice- Admiral Gervais.
ITALY.
Their Royal Highnesses The Duke and Duchess of Aosta.
JAPAN.
His Imperial Highness The Prince Akihito Komatsu.
MECKLENBURG-STRELITZ.
His Royal Highness The Hereditary Grand Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz.
MONACO.
His Serene Highness The Hereditary Prince of Monaco.
MONTENEGRO.
His Highness Prince Danilo of Montenegro.
MOROCCO.
His Excellency Kaid Abderrahman Ben Abdersadek, Governor of Fez.
ENVOY EXTRAORDINARY FROM THE HOLY SEE.
His Excellency Monsignor Merry del Val (Archbishop of Nicaea).
NETHERLANDS.
His Excellency Baron Sirtema de Grovestins.
PERSIA.
His Royal Highness Moazzed-ed-Douleb.
PORTUGAL.
His Royal Highness The Crown Prince of Portugal.
1 It has been thought that it would be interesting to put on record the names of these
Princes and Special Envoys, although they were not present on August 9, 1902. All
the " Members of Foreign Reigning Families," whose names appear in the previous
category under that heading (with the exception of the Grand Duke Michael Michaelovitch),
were also sent to England to represent their respective sovereigns in June, and were able
to be present at the postponed ceremony in August.
APPENDIX I 351
RUSSIA.
His Imperial Highness The Hereditary Grand Duke Michael.
SERVIA.
His Excellency General Laza-Petrovitch.
SIAM.
His Royal Highness The Crown Prince of Siam, G.C.V.O.
SPAIN.
His Royal Highness Don Carlos de Bourbon, Prince of the Asturias.
SWEDEN AND NORWAY.
His Royal Highness The Crown Prince of Sweden and Norway.
TURKEY.
His Excellency Turkhan Pacha.
UNITED STATES.
His Excellency The Honourable Whitelaw Reid and Mrs Whitelaw Reid.
WURTEMBERG.
His Royal Highness The Duke Albert of Wurtemberg.
ZANZIBAR.
His Excellency Prince Said AH.
No. 3.— THE DIPLOMATIC BODY.1
AMBASSADORS AND AMBASSADRESSES.
Their Excellencies —
Monsieur de Staal (Russia).
Madame de Staal.
Count Deym (Austria-Hungary).
Costaki Anthopoulos Pacha (Turkey).
Madame Anthopoulos.
Monsieur Paul Cambon (France).
The Honourable Joseph H. Choate (United States).
Mrs Choate.
The Duke of Mandas and Villanueva (Spain).
The Duchess of Mandas and Villanueva.
Monsieur Pansa (Italy).
Count Paul Wolff Metternich (Germany).
Marquis de Several (Portugal). ") The Portuguese and Japanese Ministers at the Court
Viscount Tadasu Hayashi (Japan). V of St James's were specially accredited as Ambas-
Viscountess Hayashi. j sadors to attend the Coronation.
MINISTERS AND THEIR WIVES.
General Mirza Mohammed AH Khan, Ala-es-Saltaneh (Persia).
Monsieur de Bille (Denmark).
Madame de Bille.
Baron Whettnall (Belgium).
Count C. Lewenhaupt (Sweden and Norway).
1 The lists of the Diplomatic Body have been prepared independently for the purpose
of this Appendix. They are due to the courtesy of Mr R. J. Synge, C.M.G., H.M.
Deputy Marshal of the Ceremonies, who was kind enough to send a circular to all the
Embassies and Legations asking for lists of all the members who were actually present
in Westminster Abbey on August 9, 1902. Not a single Embassy or Legation failed to
respond, so it is hoped that the names in this important category are accurate as well as
complete.
352 APPENDIX I
Countess Lewenhaupt.
Senor Don E. Machain (Paraguay).
Madame Machain.
Senor Don Felix Aramayo (Bolivia).
Senor Don Domingo Gana (Chili).
Madame Gana.
Senor Don Florencio Dominguez (Argentine Republic).
Madame Dominguez.
Monsieur Bourcart (Switzerland).
Baron Gericke van Herwijnen (Netherlands).
Baroness Gericke van Herwijnen.
Senor Don Rafael Zaldivar (Salvador).
Senor Don Joaquin Nabuco de Aranjo (Brazil).
Madame Nabuco.
Senor Don Ignacio Gutierrez- Ponce (Colombia).
Madame Gutie'rrez-Ponce.
Monsieur A. Catargi ( Roumania).
Madame Catargi.
Monsieur M. G. Militchevitch (Servia).
Min Yung Ton (Corea).
Madame Min Yung Ton.
Senor Don Alfonso Lancaster Jones (Mexico).
Madame Lancaster Jones.
Senor Don Crisanto Medina (Nicaragua).
Chang Ta-Jen (China).
Madame Chang.
Monsieur D. G. Metaxas (Greece).
Madame Metaxas.
Senor Don Homero Morla (Ecuador).
Madame Morla.
Monsieur Janvier (Hayti).
Madame Janvier.
MEMBERS OF THE DIPLOMATIC BODY ATTACHED TO THE FOREIGN
EMBASSIES AND LEGATIONS ACCREDITED TO THE COURT OF SI-
JAMES'S, AND THE LADIES BELONGING TO THOSE MISSIONS.
RUSSIA. Abdul Hak Hussein Bey.
Monsieur Poklevski-Koziell. Henry Elias Bey.
Prince M. Radziwill. Lieutenant Vassif Effendi.
Princess Radziwill. FRANCE.
Prince Wolkonski. •»» • T /-. a- •»«•• • ™
Major-General Zermoloff. Monsieur Leon Geoffray, Minister Plem-
Captain Bostroem. . . potentiary.
Madame Bostroem. Madame Leon Geoffray.
Lieutenant Theilet. Monsieur Emile Daeschner.
Madame Theilet.
Count de Manneville.
Monsieur S. Tatistcheff. Countess de Manneville.
Monsieur M. de Seynes.
AUSTRIA-HUNGARY. Monsieur A. de Fleuriau.
Count Albert Mensdorff-Pouilly-Dietrich- Madame de Fleuriau.
stein. Monsieur P. de Barante.
Count Leopold Berchtold. Count F. de Montholon.
Countess Berchtold. Captain Schilling.
Count Charles Trauttmansdorff. Lieutenant-Colonel d'Amade.
Count Louis Badeni. TlMiTirn «NTATR<;
Captain Joseph Ritter von Schwartz. ^ ^^ UNITED STATES'
TURKEY. Mr Henry White.
Abdul Hak Hamid Bey. Mrs White.
Reshid Sadi Bey. Miss White.
APPENDIX I
353
Mr J. Ridgely Carter.
Mrs Carter.
Mr Craig Wadsworth.
Captain Richardson Clover. U.S.N.
Mrs Clover.
Major E. B. Cassatt.
Mr William Woodward.
SPAIN.
Sefior Don Pablo Soler.
Madame Soler.
Senor Don A. Padilla.
Madame Padilla.
Senor Don Jose1 Landecho.
Senor Don J. Perez del Pulgar.
Staff Major Don J. de Manzanos.
Captain Don Manuel Diaz Iglesias.
ITALY.
Signor Francesco Carignani di Novoli.
Count V. di Carrobip.
Signor Livio Caetani.
Duke G. Caracciolo di Castagneta.
GERMANY.
Baron Hermann Eckhardstein.
Baroness Eckhardstein.
Dr Scheller-Steinwartz.
Dr A. Zimmermann.
Count W. Oberndorff.
Prince Lynar.
Herr von Oppell.
Captain Coerper, I.G.N.
Madame Coerper.
Major Count von der Schulenberg.
Countess Schulenberg.
PERSIA.
Mirza Mehdi Khan Moin-el-Vezaret.
Mirza Abdul Goffar Khan.
Mirza Hussein Khan.
DENMARK.
Mademoiselle de Bille.
Monsieur Torben de Bille.
Monsieur H. de Grevenkop Castenskjold.
Monsieur C. A. Gosch.
Madame Gosch.
GUATEMALA.
Monsieur Machado, Charge1 d'Affaires.
BELGIUM.
Baron A. Grenier.
Baroness Grenier.
Monsieur E. van Grootven.
Monsieur Paul May.
SWEDEN AND NORWAY.
Baron Ramel.
Count Axel Wachtmeister.
Count G. A. Lewenhaupt.
Z
PORTUGAL.
Monsieur J. da Camara Manoel.
Monsieur Antonio da C. Cabral.
PARAGUAY.
Senor Don Eusebio Ayala.
BOLIVIA.
Senor Don J. E. Zalles.
Madame Zalles.
Senor Don Eduardo Aramayo.
Lieutenant-Colonel Don Pedro Suarez.
Madame Suarez.
CHH,I.
Mademoiselle Gana.
Senor Don Victor Eastman.
Senor Don Enrique Antunez.
ARGENTINE REPUBLIC.
Mademoiselle Dominguez.
Senor Don Vicente J. Dominguez.
Senor Don Luis H. Dominguez.
Senor Don Carlos M. Dominguez.
Senor Don Carlos A. Becu.
Lieutenant-Commander Don Julian Irizj
Senor Don Manuel A. Monies de Oca.
SlAM.
Luang Ratanayapti (Charge" d'Affaires).
Mr Frederick Verney.
Mrs Frederick Verney.
SWITZERLAND.
Monsieur F. de Salis.
Madame de Salis.
Monsieur Charles R. Paravicini.
NETHERLANDS.
Monsieur C. Crommelin.
SALVADOR.
Senor Don S. Perez Triana.
Madame Triana.
JAPAN.
Mr Nabeshifna.
Mr Moritaro Abe.
Mr Yukichi Obata.
Captain Chikakata Tamari.
Major Taro Utsonomiya,
BRAZIL.
Monsieur J. M. Cardoso de Oliveria.
Madame Cardoso de Oliveria.
Monsieur S. Gurgel do Amaral.
Madame Gurgel do Amaral.
Mademoiselle Godinho.
Monsieur J. P. Graca Aranha.
COLOMBIA.
Mademoiselle Gutierrez-Ponce.
354
APPENDIX I
PERU.
Senor Don Eduardo Lembcke.
Senor Don Pablo E. Caballero.
Senor Don Ricardo E. Lembcke.
Mademoiselle Lembcke.
ROUMANIA.
Mademoiselle Mariette Catargi.
Mademoiselle Olga Catargi.
Monsieur A. A. Catargi.
Monsieur M. B. Boeresco.
Monsieur D. Burilliano.
COREA.
Aw Dal Yung.
Madame Aw Dal Yung.
Yi Han Eung.
Yee Key Hyun.
MEXICO.
Mademoiselle Luisa Zubieta.
Senor Don Miguel de Beistegui.
Madame de Beistegui.
Senor Don Crisoforo Causeco.
NICARAGUA.
Mademoiselle Medina.
Monsieur Manzano Tarres.
CHINA.
Sir Halliday Macartney, K.C.M.G.
Mr Chen Mou-Ting.
Mr Chou Hung-Yii.
Mr Ivan Chen.
GREECE.
Mademoiselle Metaxas.
Monsieur Alexandre C. Carapanos.
ECUADOR.
Senor Don E. Dorn y de Alsiia.
Senor Don Celso Nevares.
SPECIAL MISSIONS.
BAROTSELAND.
Lewanika, Paramount Chief of the Barotse
Kingdom.
Lieutenant-Colonel Colin Harding, C.M.G.
Ngambella Nigekna, Prime Mnister.
Ishi Kambai (son-in-law).
Kuarte, Government Interpreter.
ETHIOPIA.
His Highness Ras Makunan.
Lieutenant-Colonel John Lane Harrington,
C.V.O.
Captain James.
Abbatabar.
Hailahsallassi.
Mehima.
Kalhba.
Bern.
Fitausari.
No. 4. — THE LORDS SPIRITUAL AND TEMPORAL WHO DID HOMAGE TO
THE KING AFTER THE ENTHRON1ZATION OF HlS MAJESTY AT
WESTMINSTER ABBEY ; AND THE PEERESSES.
THE LORDS SPIRITUALS
Frederick-(Temple) Lord Archbishop of Canterbury. (P. C. )
William-Dalyrmple-(Maclagan) Lord Archbishop of York. (P. C. )
Arthur- Foley-(Winnington- Ingram) Lord Bishop of London. (f.C.)
1 The family names of the Lords Spiritual have been added as being useful for future
reference. Otherwise the list is identical with that which appeared in the Coronation
Supplement to the London Gazette of October 29, 1902. It differs in some respects from
the enumeration of the Archbishops and Bishops in the lists specially drawn up by the Earl
Marshal's office, in which Garter's Roll is referred to for the names of the Lords Spiritual
and Temporal. But Garter's Roll gives the order of the peerage, without specifying
which peers were present at the Coronation. The lists of the peerage transcribed here are
those which the Earl Marshal issued in the London Gazette, and which include only those
peers who did homage at Westminster Abbey. This small matter is mentioned because a
comparison of Garter's Roll with the list in the London Gazette raises an interesting point
concerning the Spiritual Peers. Garter's Roll gives the names only of those Bishops who
had taken their seats in the House of Lords on August 9, 1902 ; while the list in the
Gazette, quoted above, includes the Bishop of St Davids and the seven other junior
Bishops who were then awaiting vacancies before they could take their seats, under
10 and II Viet. c. 108. The eight Bishops thus omitted from Garter's Roll were
included in a supplementary list drawn up in the Earl Marshal's office, under the heading
APPENDIX I 355
Handley-Carr-Glyn-(Moule) Lord Bishop of Durham.
Randall-Thomas-(Davidson) Lord Bishop of Winchester.
Charles-John-(Ellicott) Lord Bishop of Gloucester.
Ernest-Roland-(Wilberforce) Lord Bishop of Chichester.
William-Boyd-(Carpenter) Lord Bishop of Ripon.
Edward-(King) Lord Bishop of Lincoln.
(The Lord) Ahvyne-(Compton) Lord Bishop of Ely.
Alfred-George-( Ed wards) Lord Bishop of St Asaph.
John-Wogan-(Festing) Lord Bishop of St. Albans.
John-(Gott) Lord Bishop of Truro.
(The Honourable) Augustus-(Legge) Lord Bishop of Lichfield.
John-Wareing-(Bardsley) Lord Bishop of Carlisle.
John-(Sheepshanks) Lord Bishop of Norwich.
George- Wyndham-(Kennion) Lord Bishop of Bath and Wells.
John-(Percival) Lord Bishop of Hereford.
Edward-Stuart-(Talbot) Lord Bishop of Rochester.
Edgar-(Jacob) Lord Bishop of Newcastle.
John-(Owen) Lord Bishop of St David's.
George-(Forrest-Browne) Lord Bishop of Bristol.
George-( Rodney- Eden) Lord Bishop of Wakefield.
Watkin-(Williams) Lord Bishop of Bangor.
Francis-(Chavasse) Lord Bishop of Liverpool.
Herbert-(Ryle) Lord Bishop of Exeter.
Francis-(Paget) Lord Bishop of Oxford.
Charles-(Gore) Lord Bishop of Worcester.
Norman-Dumenil-John-(Straton) Lord Bishop of Sodor and Man.
THE LORDS TEMPORAL.
Princes of the. Blood Royal being Peers of Parliament.
His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales, K.G., K.T., K.P.. G.C.M.G., G.C.V.O. (P.C.)
His Royal Highness Arthur- William-Patrick-Albert Duke of Connaught and Strathearn,
K.G., K.T., K.P., G.C.B., G.C.S.I., G.C.M.G., G.C.I.E., G.C.V.O. (P.C.)
of "Bishops not Peers," and these were each styled "The Right Reverend the Bishop"
without the title of "Lord." While it is certain that no Bishops have the right to be
called Lord except the diocesans of the recognized Sees of England and Wales, the
proceedings at the Coronation seem to prove that the Bishops of all English and Welsh
Sees are Lords, including those waiting their turn for vacancies in the House of Peers.
For all the Bishops, in the list above, are styled by the Earl Marshal's orders, in the
Special Gazette, Lords Spiritual, including the eight who were technically not yet Lords
of Parliament, and they all "pronounced the words of homage after the Archbishop,
kneeling in their places." At the same time, the omission of the word " Lord " from the
title of the junior Bishops, in the aforementioned list, drawn up in the Earl Marshal's
office, is not accidental, as that list of " Bishops not Peers " is headed with the name of the
Primate of All Ireland (Dr Alexander), who sat among the Bishops of England and Wales,
and who is there called "The Lord Archbishop of Armagh" by reason of his having
been a Lord of Parliament, when Bishop of Derry and Raphoe, before the disestablish-
ment of the Irish Church. The point is interesting as the two conflicting authorities are
both under the high direction of the Earl Marshal. But the acceptance by the King of
the homage of the Bishops who had not yet seats in the House of Peers seems conclusively
to class them as Lords Spiritual. This was in accordance with the precedent at Queen
Victoria's Coronation, when all the Irish prelates present did homage as Lords, while
only four of them had seats ; although, owing to the peculiar position of the Irish peers
under the Act of Union, the case is not quite on all fours with that of English Bishops
who have not yet taken their seats. It may be added that the Bishop of Sodor and Man,
who has a position apart, having a seat, but never a vote, in the House of Lords, though
he did homage, is not included in Garter's Roll.
356 APPENDIX I
His Royal Highness George-William-Frederick-Charles Duke of Cambridge, K.G.. K.T.,
K.P., G.C.B., G.C.S.I., G.C.M.G., G.C.I.E., G.C.V.O. (P.C.)
DUKES.I
Henry Duke of Norfork, Earl Marshal and Hereditary Marshal of England, K.G. (P. C.)
Algernon Duke of Somerset.
Augustus-Charles-Lennox Duke of Grafton, K.G., C.B.
Henry-Adelbert-Wellington-Fitzroy Duke of Beaufort.
George-Godolphin Duke of Leeds.
Herbrand-Arthur Duke of Bedford, K.G.
Spencer-Compton Duke of Devonshire, K.G. (P.C.)
Charles-Richard-John Duke of Marlborough, K.G. (P.C.)
John-James-Robert Duke of Rutland, K.G., G.C.B. (P.C.)
William-Henry-Walter Duke of Buccleuch, K.G., K.T.
Sihn-Douglas-Sutherland Duke of Argyll, K.T., G.C.M.G., G.C.V.O. (P.C.)
enry-John Duke of Roxburghe, K.T., M.V.O.
William-John-Arthur-Charles-James Duke of Portland, K.G., G.C.V.O. (P.C.)
William-Angus-Drogo Duke of Manchester.
Henry- Pelham -Archibald-Douglas Duke of Newcastle.
Henry-George Duke of Northumberland, K.G. (P.C.)
Arthur-Charles Duke of Wellington, K.G., G.C.V.O.
Cromartie Duke of Sutherland, K.G.
James Duke of Abercorn, K.G., C.B. (P.C.)
Hugh- Richard- Arthur Duke of Westminster.
Alexander- William-George Duke of Fife, K.T., G.C.V.O. (P.C.)
MARQUESSES.
Henry -William-Montagu Marquess of Winchester.
Charles Marquess of Huntly. (P.C.)
Percy-Sholto Marquess of Queensberry.
William- Montagu Marquess of Tweeddale, K.T.
Henry-Charles-Keith Marquess of Lansdown.e, K.G., G.C.S.I., G.C.M.G., G.C.I.E. (P.C.)
John-James-Dudley-Stuart Marquess Townshend.
Thomas-Henry Marquess of Bath.
Hugh-de-Grey Marquess of Hertford. (P.C.)
John Marquess of Bute.
Arthur- Wills-John-Wellington-Trumbull-Blundell Marquess of Downshire.
William-Thomas-Brownlow Marquess of Exeter.
John-Charles Marquess Camden.
Henry-Cyril Marquess of Anglesey.
George-Henry-Hugh Marquess of Cholmondeley. (P.C.)
Charles-Stewart Marquess of Londonderry, K.G. (P.C.)
James-Edward-William-Theobald Marquess of Ormonde, K.P. (P.C.)
Frederick- William-John Marquess of Bristol.
Archibald Marquess of Ailsa.
Constantine-Charles-Henry Marquess of Normanby.
Gavin Marquess of Breadalbane, K.G. (P.C.)
Terence-John-Temple Marquess of Dufferin and Ava.
Lawrence Marquess of Zetland, K.T. (P. C. )
1 These lists of the Lords Temporal as given in the Coronation Supplement of the
London Gazette differ from Garter's Roll, in that the Peers are arranged according to
their respective orders, no notice being taken of the official precedence given to the Lord
Chancellor, the Lord President, the Lord Steward, etc. The reason being that official
rank, as apart from nobiliary rank, was not recognised at the homage. For a somewhat
analogous reason all the Lords Spiritual are put before all the Lords Temporal, including
even Princes of the Blood Royal, the Archbishop having done homage before H.R.H.
the Prince of Wales in accordance with ancient precedent. See footnote, p. 306.
APPENDIX I 357
EARLS.
Charles- Henry- John Earl of Shrewsbury.
Frederick-Arthur Earl of Derby, K.G., G.C.B. (P.O.)
Warner-Francis-John-Plantagenet Earl of Huntingdon.
Sidney Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery, G.C.V.O. (P.C.)
Rudolph-Robert-Basil-Aloysius-Augustine Earl of Denbigh.
Montague-Peregrine-Albemarle Earl of Lindsey.
William Earl of Stamford.
Ed wyn- Francis Earl of Chesterfield. (P.C.)
Edward-George-Henry Earl of Sandwich.
George-Devereux-De-Vere Earl of Essex.
George-James Earl of Carlisle.
Anthony Earl of Shaftesbury.
Aldred-Frederick-George-Beresford Earl of Scarbrough.
Arnold-Allan-Cecil Earl of Albemarle, C.B., M.V.O.
George- William Earl of Coventry. (P.C.)
Victor-Albert-George Earl of Jersey, G.C.B., G.C.M.G. (P.C.)
James-Ludovic Earl of Crawford, K.T.
Charles-Gore Earl of Errol, K.T., C.B.
John-Francis-Erskine Earl of Mar.
Norman-Evelyn Earl of Rothes.
Sholto-George- Watson Earl of Morton.
George-Arnulph Earl of Eglintoun.
Walter-John-Francis Earl of Mar and Kellie.
Claude Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorn.
George Earl of Haddington, K.T.
Randolph-Henry Earl of Galloway.
Frederick-Henry Earl of Lauderdale.
David-Clark Earl of Lindsay.
Archibald-Fitzroy-George Earl of Kinnoull.
Charles-Edward-Hastings Earl of Loudoun.
Victor-Alexander Earl of Elgin and Kincardine, K.G., G.C.S.I., G.C.I.E. (P.C.)
Francis-Richard Earl of Wemyss.
Ronald- Ruth ven Earl of Leven and Melville. (P. C. )
Algernon-Hawkins-Thomond Earl of Kintore, G.C.M.G. (P.C.)
John-Campbell Earl of Aberdeen, G.C.M.G. (P.C.)
Edmond-Walter Earl of Orkney.
Archibald-Philip Earl of Rosebery, K.G., K.T. (P.C.)
William-Heneage Earl of Dartmouth. (P.C.)
Charles-Wightwick Earl of Aylesford.
Francis-Thomas-De-Grey Earl Cowper, K.G. (P.C.)
Arthur-Philip Earl Stanhope.
William-Frederick Earl Waldegrave.
Newton Earl of Portsmouth.
Francis- Richard-Charles-Guy Earl Brooke and Earl of Warwick.
William-Charles-De-Meuron Earl Fitzwilliam.
Frederick-George Earl of Guilford.
Albert-Edward-Philip-Henry Earl of Hardwicke.
Jacob Earl of Radnor.
John-Poyntz Earl Spencer, K.G. (P.C.)
Seymour-Henry Earl Bathurst, C.M.G.
William-David Earl of Mansfield.
William-Henry Earl of Mount-Edgcumbe, G.C.V.O. (P. C. )
George- Edward-Stanhope-Molyneux Earl of Carnarvon.
George-Henry Earl Cadogan, K.G. (P.C.)
James-Edward Earl of Malmesbury.
Richard-Edmund-St-Lawrence Earl of Cork and Orrery, K.P. (P.C.)
Anthony- Francis Earl of Westmeath. (P.C.)
Reginald Earl of Meath. (P.C.)
Frederick-Rudolph Earl of Cavan.
Ponsonby- William Earl of Drogheda.
358 APPENDIX I
Ivo-Francis Walter Earl of Darnley.
John-Vansittart-Danvers Earl of Lanesborough.
Arthur-Jocelyn-Charles Earl of Arran.
John-Horatio Earl of Mexborough.
Osbert-Cecil Earl of Sefton.
Richard-James Earl of Clanwilliam, G.C.B., K.C.M.G.
Dermot-Robert-Wyndham Earl of Mayo. (P.C.)
Lowry-Egerton Earl of Enniskillen, K.P.
John-Henry Earl of Erne, K. P. (P. C. )
William Earl of Carysfort, K.P.
Hamilton-John-Agmondesham Earl of Desart, K.C.B.
Ralph-Francis Earl of Wicklow.
Rupert-Charles Earl of Clonmell.
Charles Earl of Leitrim.
George Earl of Lucan, K.P.
James-Francis Earl of Bandon, K.P.
Henry-James Earl Castle Stewart.
James-Francis-Harry Earl of Rosslyn.
William-George-Robert Earl of Craven.
William-Hillier Earl of Onslow, G.C.M.G.
William-Frederick Earl of Clancarty.
George-Charles Earl of Powis.
Archibald-Brabazon-Sparrow Earl of Gosford, K.P.
Lawrence Earl of Rosse, K.P.
Sidney- James-Ellis Earl of Normanton.
Charles-William-Sydney Earl Manvers.
Robert-Horace Earl of Orford.
Albert- Henry-George Earl Grey.
Hugh-Cecil Earl of Lonsdale.
John-Herbert-Dudley Earl of Harrowby.
Henry-Ulick Earl of Harewood.
James- Walter Earl of Verulam.
Henry-Cornwallis Earl of Saint Germans.
Albert- Edmund Earl of Morley. (P. C. )
George-Cecil-Orlando Earl of Bradford.
William Earl Beauchamp.
Henry- North Earl of Sheffield.
John Earl of Eldon.
George-Richard-Penn Earl Howe.
George-Edward-John-Mowbray Earl of Stradbroke.
Algernon- William-Stephen Earl Temple of Stowe.
Francis-Charles Earl of Kilmorey, K.P.
William Earl of Listowel, K.P.
Frederick-Archibald- Vaughan Earl Cawdor.
William-Brabazon-Lindesay Earl of Norbury.
Aubrey Earl of Munster.
Robert-Adam-Philips-Haldane Earl of Camperdown.
Thomas-Francis Earl of Lichfield.
John-George Earl of Durham.
Granville-George Earl Granville.
Henry-Alexander-Gordon Earl of Effingham.
Charles- Alfred- Worsley Earl of Yarborou«h. (P. C. )
Charles-William-Francis Earl of Gainsborough.
Francis-Charles-Granville Earl of Ellesmere.
Kenelm-Charles-Edward Earl of Cottenham.
Henry-Arthur-Mornington Earl Cowley.
William Humble Earl of Dudley.
Vesey Earl of Dartrey.
Francis-John Earl of Wharncliffe.
William-Ernest Earl of Feversham.
Thomas-George Earl of Northbrook, G.C.S. I. (P.C.)
APPENDIX I 359
Herbert-John Earl Cairns.
Victor-Alexander-George-Robert Earl of Lytton.
Edward-George Earl of Lathom.
William-Waldegrave Earl of Selborne. (P. C. )
Cornwallis Earl de Montalt.
Charles-Robert Earl Carrington, G.C.M.G. (P.C.)
Robert-Offiey-Ashburton Earl of Crewe. (P. C.)
Wilbraham Earl Egerton.
Hardinge-Stanley Earl of Halsbury. (P. C. )
Frederick-Sleigh Earl Roberts, K.G., K.P., G.C.B., O.M., G.C.S.I., G.C.I.E.,
B.C. (P.C.)
Evelyn Earl of Cromer, G.C.B., G.C.M.G., G.C.V.O., K.C.S.I. (P.C.)
VISCOUNTS.
Byron-Plantagenet Viscount Falkland.
Charles-George Viscount Cobham.
Evelyn-Edward-Thomas Viscount Falmouth, C.B., M.V.O.
Jenico-William-Joseph Viscount Gormanston, G.C.M.G.
Henry-Edmund Viscount Mountgarret.
Harold-Arthur Viscount Dillon.
Hugh-Richard Viscount Downe, C.B., C.I.E.
Samuel Viscount Moles worth.
Gustavus- Russell Viscount Boyne.
Walter-Bulkeley Viscount Barrington.
George-Edmund-Milnes Viscount Galway.
Mervy n-Ed ward Viscount Powerscourt, K.P. (P.C.)
William-Geoffrey-Bouchard Viscount Mountmorres.
Arthur-Robert-Pyers-Joseph-Mary Viscount Southwell.
James-Wilfrid Viscount Lifford.
Henry-William-Crosbie Viscount Bangor.
Thomas-Charles Viscount Clifden.
Edward Viscount Doneraile.
Henry- Power-Charles-Stanley Viscount Monck.
Henry-Charles Viscount Hardinge.
Charles-Lindley Viscount Halifax.
William-Henry-Berkeley Viscount Portman.
Henry-Robert Viscount Hampden, G.C.M.G.
Garnet-Joseph Viscount Wolseley, K.P., G.C.B., O.M., G.C.M.G.
Richard-Assheton Viscount Cross, G.C.B., G.C.S.I. (P.C.)
Henry-Thurstan Viscount Knutsford, G.C.M.G. (P.C.)
Reginald-Baliol Viscount Esher, K.C.B., K.C.V.O.
George-Joachim Viscount Goschen. (P.C.)
Horatio-Herbert Viscount Kitchener, G.C.B., G.C.M.G.
Charles-John Viscount Colville of Culross, K.T., G.C.V.O. (P.C.)
Victor-Albert-Francis-Charles Viscount Churchill, K.C.V.O.
BARONS.
Dudley-Charles Lord De Ros, K.P., K.C.V.O.
Charles-Botolph-Joseph Lord Mowbray.
George-Manners Lord Hastings.
Robert-Nathaniel-Cecil-George Lord Zouche of Haryngworth.
Rawdon-George-Grey Lord Grey de Ruthyn.
Hubert-George-Charles Lord Vaux of Harrowden.
Robert-George Lord Windsor. (P.C.)
William-Henry Lord North.
Beauchamp-Moubray Lord St John of Bletso.
Thomas-Evelyn Lord Howard de Walden.
Bernard-Henry-Philip Lord Petre.
John-Fiennes Lord Saye and Sele.
Ronald-John Lord Dormer.
Henry-John-Philip-Sidney Lord Teynham,
360 APPENDIX I
George-Frederick-William Lord Byron.
Lewis-Henry-Hugh Lord Clifford of Chudleigh.
Henry-de-Vere Lord Barnard.
Alexander-William-Frederick Lord Saltoun.
Charles- William Lord Sinclair.
William Lord Sempill.
Marmaduke-Francis Lord Herries.
Sidney-Herbert Lord Elphinstone.
Simon-Joseph Lord Lovat.
Archibald-Patrick-Thomas Lord Borthwick.
Alexander-Hugh Lord Balfour of Burleigh, K.T. (P.C.)
William-John-George Lord Napier.
Donald-James Lord Reay, G.C.S.I., G.C.I.E.
Montolieu-Fox Lord Elibank.
Alexander-Charles Lord Belhaven and Stenton.
Walter-James Lord Ruthven.
Arthur-Fitzgerald Lord Kinnaird.
Digby-Wentworth-Bayard Lord Middleton.
Augustus-Debonnaire-John Lord Monson.
Alfred-Nathaniel-Holden Lord Scarsdale.
George-Florance Lord Boston.
Edward-Henry-Trafalgar Lord Digby.
Martin-Bladen Lord Hawke.
Henry-Thomas Lord Foley.
Thomas Lord Walsingham.
John-Richard-Brinsley Lord Grantley.
Richard- Henry Lord Berwick.
Edward-Lennox Lord Sherborne.
Charles Lord Suffield, G.C.V.O., K.C.B. (P.C.)
Lloyd Lord Kenyon.
George-Augustus-Hamilton Lord Fisherwick (Marquess of Donegall).1
Henry-Charles Lord Gage ( Viscount Gage)^
William-Thomas Lord Bolton.
Thomas Lord Ribblesdale. (P.C.)
Edward-John-Moreton-Drax Lord Dunsany.
Robert-St-John-Fitzwalter Lord Dunboyne.
Lucius-William Lord Inchiquin.
William-Charles Lord Newborough.
Hugh Lord Kensington.
John-Thomas-William Lord Massy.
Hamilton-Matthew-Fitzmaurice Lord Muskerry.
Josslyn-Francis Lord Muncaster.
Francis- William Lord Kilmaine.
Luke-Gerald Lord Clonbrock, K.P. (P.C.)
Edward- Henry-Churchill Lord Crofton.
William Lord de Blaquiere.
Henry-O'Callaghan Lord Dunalley.
Granville-Augustus- William Lord Radstock.
Frederick-Oliver Lord Ashtown.
Lionel-Edward Lord Clarina.
Edward-Downes Lord Ellenborough.
John-Thomas Lord Manners.
Albert-Edward Lord Castlemaine.
William-Marcus-De-la-Poer, Lord Decies.
George-Robert-Canning Lord Harris, G. C.S.I., G.C.I.E.
Reginald-Charles-Edward Lord Colchester.
Hugh Lord Delamere.
Cecil-Theodore Lord Forester.
1 It seems to be by error that Lord Donegall and Lord Gage are not respectively
placed by the Earl Marshal among the Marquesses and Viscounts.
APPENDIX I 361
John-William Lord Rayleigh.
William-Lee Lord Plunket, C.V.O.
Llewelyn-Nevill-Vaughan Lord Mostyn.
Henry-Spencer Lord Templemore.
James- Yorke-McGregor Lord Abinger.
Philip Lord De L'Isle and Dudley.
Francis-Denzil-Edward Lord Ashburton.
Edward-George-Percy Lord Hatherton, C.M.G.
Hallyburton-George, Lord Stratheden.
Geoffrey-Henry, Lord Oranmore and Browne.
William-Ashley-Webb Lord De Mauley.
Beilby Lord Wenlock, G.C.S.I., G.C.I.E., K.C.B. (P.C.)
William Lord Lurgan.
Thomas Spring Lord Monteagle of Brandon, K.P.
John-Reginald-Upton Lord Seaton.
George-Crespigny-Brabazon Lord Vivian.
Henry Lord Congleton, C.B. /
Charles-Bertram Lord Bellew.
Arthur Lord De Freyne.
George-Fitz-Roy-Henry Lord Raglan.
Henry Lord Belper. (P.C.)
Charles-Compton-William Lord Chesham, K.C.B.
Frederic- Augustus Lord Chelmsford, G.C.B.
Charles-Henry Lord Leconfield.
Godfrey-Charles Lord Tredegar.
Henry-Charles Lord Brougham and Vaux.
Richard-Luttrell-Pilkington Lord Westbury.
Luke Lord Annaly.
Hylton-George-Hylton Lord Hylton.
George-Sholto-Gordon Lord Penrhyn.
Arthur Lord Ormathwaite.
Robert- William Lord Napier (of Magdala).
Sin-Hamilton Lord Lawrence.
rnard-Edward-Barnaby Lord Castletown, C.M.G.
Frederick Lord Wolverton.
Henry-Campbell Lord Aberdare.
Thomas-Francis Lord Cottesloe.
Herbert-Perrott-Murray Lord Hampton.
William-Richard Lord Harlech.
tvor-Bertie Lord Wimborne.
Arthur-Edward Lord Ardilaun.
Arthur- William Lord Trevor.
Edward Lord Tweedmouth. (P.C.)
John-William Lord Monk Bretton.
Nathaniel-Mayer Lord Rothschild. (P.C.)
John Lord Revelstoke.
Robert Lord Monkswell.
Edward Lord Ashbourne. (P.C.)
Rowland Lord Saint Oswald.
Robert-Wilfrid Lord Deramore.
Henry-John Lord Montagu of Beaulieu.
Charles- William Lord Hillingdon.
Richard-de-Aquila Lord Stalbridge. (P.C.)
Michael-Arthur Lord Burton.
Gavin-George Lord Hamilton of Dalzell.
Thomas Lord Brassey, K.C.B.
John Lord Saint Levan.
George-Limbrey Lord Basing.
Egerton Lord Addington.
John-Savile Lord Savile.
Edward-Cecil Lord Iveagh, K.P.
362 APPENDIX I
George Lord Mount Stephen.
William Lord Kelvin, G. C. V. O. (P. C. )
George Lord Ashcombe. (P.C.)
Archibald-Campbell Lord Blythswood.
Thomas Lord Crawshaw.
William-Amhurst Lord Amherst of Hackney.
Thomas- Wodehouse Lord Newton.
Henry-Lyle Lord Dunleath.
John-Allan Lord Llangattock.
George-James Lord Playfair.
Cyril Lord Battersea.
Ernest-Ambrose Lord Swansea.
John-Campbell Lord Overtoun.
Cecil-George-Savile Lord Hawkesbury.
Arthur Lord Stanmore, G.C.M.G.
Reginald- Earle Lord Welby, G.C.B.
Horace Lord Davey. (P. C. ) (A Lord of Appeal in Ordinary. )
Sydney-James Lord Wandsworth.
Herbert-Coulstoun Lord Burghclere.
Henry Lord James of Hereford. (P. C. )
David-Robert Lord Rathmore. (P.C.)
Henry Lord Pirbright. (P.C.)
Algernon Lord Glenesk.
Henry-Hucks Lord Aldenham.
Edward Lord Heneage. (P. C. )
Hercules-Arthur-Temple Lord Rosmead.
Alexander-Smith Lord Kinnear.
Joseph Lord Lister. (P.C.)
Henry-Ludlow Lord Ludlow.
George-Arbuthnot Lord Inverclyde.
Donald- Alexander Lord Strathcona and Mount Royal, G.C.M.G.
William-Wallace Lord Newlands.
Horace-Brand Lord Farquhar, K.C.V.O.
Joseph-Russell Lord Glanusk.
James- Patrick-Bannerman Lord Robertson. (P.C.) (A Lord of Appeal in Ordinary.)
Martin-Henry Lord Killanin.
Peter Lord O'Brien. (P.C.)
John-Blair Lord Kinross.
William- Lawies Lord Allerton.
Arthur-Hugh Lord Barrymore. (P. C. )
Francis-Wallace Lord Grenfell, G.C.B., G.C.M.G.
Francis Lord Knollys, G.C.V.O., K.C.B., K.C.M.G.
Algernon-Bertram Lord Redesdale, C.V.O., C.B.
PEERESSES AND DOWAGER PEERESSES.
PRINCESSES OF THE BLOOD ROYAL BEING PEERESSES OF THE UNITED KINGDOM.
Her Royal Highness the Princess of Wales.
Her Royal Highness the Princess Louise- Victoria-Alexandra-Dagmar Duchess of Fife.
Her Royal Highness the Princess Louise-Caroline-Alberta Duchess of Argyll.
Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Connaught and Strathearn.
Her Royal Highness the Duchess Dowager of Albany.
DUCHESSES.
Susan-Margaret Duchess of Somerset.
Louise Duchess of Beaufort.
Katherine-Frances Duchess of Leeds.
Adeline-Marie Duchess Dowager of Bedford.
Mary-du-Caurroy Duchess of Bedford.
Louise- Fredericke-Auguste Duchess of Devonshire,
Consuelo Duchess of Marlborough.
Louisa-Jane Duchess of Buccleuch,
APPENDIX I 363
Ina-Erskine Duchess Dowager of Argyll.
Violet-Hermione Duchess of Montrose.
Anne-Emily Duchess Dowager of Roxburghe.
Winifred Duchess of Portland.
Consuelo Duchess Dowager of Manchester.
Helena Duchess of Manchester.
Kathleen-Florence-May Duchess of Newcastle.
Edith Duchess of Northumberland.
Kathleen-Emily-Bulkeley Duchess of Wellington.
Millicent-Fanny Duchess of Sutherland.
Mary-Anna Duchess of Abercorn.
Constance-Edwina Duchess of Westminster.
MARCHIONESSES.
Charlotte-Josephine Marchioness of Winchester.
Amy Marchioness of Huntly.
Anna-Maria Marchioness of Queensberry.
Candida-Louisa Marchioness of Tweeddale.
Maud-Evelyn Marchioness of Lansdowne.
Violet-Caroline Marchioness of Bath.
Mary Marchioness of Hertford.
Gwendoline-Mary-Anne Marchioness Dowager of Bute.
Georgiana- Elizabeth Marchioness Dowager of Downshire.
Emily-Constantia Marchioness Dowager of Headfort.
Isabelle-Raymonde Marchioness Dowager of Sligo.
Caroline-Ann Marchioness Dowager of Ely.
Isabella Marchioness Dowager of Exeter.
Myra-Rowena-Sibell Marchioness of Exeter.
Joan-Marion Marchioness Camden.
Mary-Livingstone Marchioness Dowager of Anglesey.
Lilian-Florence-Maud Marchioness of Anglesey.
Winifred-Ida Marchioness of Cholmondeley.
Mary-Cornelia Marchioness Dowager of Londonderry.
Theresa-Susey-Helen Marchioness of Londonderry.
Jane-St-Maur- Blanche Marchioness Dowager Conyngham.
Elizabeth-Harriet Marchioness of Ormonde.
Geraldine-Georgiana-Mary Marchioness of Bristol.
Isabella Marchioness of Ailsa.
Alma-Imogen-Carlotta-Leonore Marchioness of Breadalbane.
Florence-Chapman Marchioness of Dufferin and Ava.
Lilian-Elizabeth-Selina Marchioness of Zetland.
COUNTESSES.
Anna-Theresa Countess Dowager of Shrewsbury.
Constance Countess of Derby.
Maud-Margaret Countess of Huntingdon.
Beatrix-Louisa Countess of Pembroke and Montgomery.
Cecilia-Mary Countess of Denbigh.
Sybil-Mary Countess of Westmoreland.
Millicent Countess of Lindsey.
Elizabeth-Louisa-Penelope Countess of Stamford.
Dorothea Countess Dowager of Chesterfield.
Enid-Edith Countess of Chesterfield.
Adela Countess of Essex.
Lucy-Cecilia Countess of Scarbrough.
Gertrude-Lucia Countess of Albemarle.
Blanche Countess of Coventry.
Margaret-Elizabeth Countess of Jersey.
Emily-Florence Countess of Crawford.
Mary-Caroline Countess of Enroll.
AUce-Mary Countess of Mar.
364 APPENDIX I
Noelle Countess of Rothes.
Helen-Geraldine-Maria Countess of Morton.
Janet-Lucretia Countess of Eglintoun.
Mary-Anne Countess Dowager of Mar and Kellie.
Susan- Violet Countess of Mar and Kellie.
Anna-Mary Countess Dowager of Moray.
Gertrude- Floyer Countess of Moray.
Frances-Dora Countess of Strathmore and Kinghorn.
Mary-Arabella-Arthur Countess Dowager of Galloway.
Amy-Mary-Pauline Countess of Galloway.
Ada-Twyford Countess of Lauderdale.
Emily-Marian Countess of Lindsay.
Alice-Mary-Elizabeth Countess of Loudoun.
Grace-Helen Countess of Wemyss.
Emma-Selina Countess of Leven and Melville.
Cecilia-Florence Countess of Dysart.
Cicely- Louisa Countess Dowager of Selkirk.
Winifred Countess of Dundonald.
Sydney-Charlotte Countess of Kintore.
Ishbel-Maria Countess of Aberdeen.
Constance Countess of Orkney.
Leonora-Sophie Countess of Tankerville.
Jane-Wightwick Countess Dowager of Aylesford.
Ella-Victoria Countess of Aylesford.
Katrine-Cecilia Countess Cowper.
Evelyn Countess Stanhope.
Mary-Dorothea Countess Waldegrave.
Beatrice-Mary Countess of Portsmouth.
Anne Countess Dowager Brooke and Countess Dowager of Warwick.
Frances-Evelyn Countess Brooke and Countess of Warwick.
Maud-Frederica-Elizabeth Countess Fitzwilliam.
Georgiana Countess Dowager of Guilford.
Mary- Violet Countess of Guilford.
Constance-Mary-Elizabeth Countess Dowager de la Warr (bv special permission).
Julian Countess of Radnor.
Charlotte-Frances-Frederica Countess Spencer.
Evelyn-Barnard Countess Dowager Bathurst.
Lilias-Margaret-Frances Countess Bathurst.
Almina-Victoria-Maria-Alexander Countess of Carnarvon.
Beatrix-Jane Countess Cadogan.
Sylvia-Georgina Countess Dowager of Malmesbury.
Elizabeth-Mary-Margaret Countess of Fingall.
Mary Countess Dowager of Cavan.
Caroline-Inez Countess of Cavan.
Anne-Tower Countess of Drogheda.
Frances-Mary Countess Dowager of Granard.
Florence-Rose Countess of Darnley.
Anne-Elizabeth Countess of Lanesborough.
Winifred-Ellen Countess Dowager of Arran.
Sophia Countess Dowager of Roden.
Evelyn Countess Dowager of Lisburne.
Elizabeth-Henrietta Countess of Clanwilliam.
Louisa-Jane Countess of Antrim.
Mary-Julia Countess of Longford.
Geraldine-Sarah Countess of Mayo.
Priscilla-Cecilia Countess Annesley.
Charlotte-Marion Countess of Enniskillen.
Florence-Mary Countess of Erne.
Charlotte-Mary Countess of Carysfort.
Ellen Countess Dowager of Desart.
Margaret-Joan Countess of Desart,
APPENDIX I 365
Lucy-Maria Countess Dowager of Clonmell.
Winifred Countess Dowager of Leitrim.
Cecilia-Catherine Countess of Lucan.
Georgiana-Dorothea-Harriet Countess of Bandon.
Augusta-Le-Vicomte Countess Castle Stewart.
Frances-Isabella Countess Dowager of Donoughmore.
Elizabeth Countess Dowager of Caledon.
Evelyn-Laura Countess Dowager of Craven.
Cornelia Countess of Craven.
Florence-Coulstoun Countess of Onslow.
Mary-Imelda Countess of Limerick.
Adeliza-Georgiana Countess Dowager of Clancarty.
Isabel-Maude-Penrice Countess of Clancarty.
Violet-Ida-Evelyn Countess of Powis.
Louisa-Augusta-Beatrice Countess of Gosford.
Frances-Cassandra Countess of Rosse.
Caroline-Susan-Augusta Countess Dowager of Normanton.
Amy-Frederica-Alice Countess of Normanton.
Helen Countess Manvers.
Louise-Melissa Countess of Orford.
Alice Countess Grey.
Mabel Countess of Harrowby.
Florence-Katherine Countess of Harewood.
Emily-Harriet Countess of Saint Germans.
Margaret Countess of Morley.
Ida-Frances- Annabella Countess of Bradford.
Lettice-Mary-Elizabeth Countess Beauchamp.
Isabella-Katharine Countess Dowager Howe.
Georgiana-Elizabeth Countess Howe.
Helena- Violet- Alice Countess of Stradbroke.
Ellen-Constance Countess of Kilmorey.
Florence-Elizabeth Countess of Dunraven and Mount-Earl.
Ernestine-Mary Countess of Listowel.
Mildred Countess of Lichfield.
Castalia-Rosalind Countess Dowager Granville.
Nina-Ayesha Countess Granville.
Marcia-Amelia-Mary Countess of Yarborough (in her own right Baroness Conytrs).
Jane Countess Dowager of Lovelace.
Mary-Elizabeth Countess of Gainsborough.
Cora Countess Dowager of Straff ord.
Theodosia-Selina Countess Dowager of Cottenham.
Rose Countess of Cottenham.
Rachel Countess of Dudley.
Sibell-Lilian Countess of Cromartie.
Isabel-Geraldine Countess of Kimberley.
Julia-Georgiana-Sarah Countess of Dartrey.
Ellen Countess of Wharncliffe.
Edith Countess Dowager of Lytton.
Pamela Countess of Lytton.
Wilma Countess of Lathom.
Charlotte Countess Dowager Sondes.
Beatrix-Maud Countess of Selborne.
Elizabeth-Lucy Countess of Iddesleigh.
Grace-Augusta Countess of Londesborough.
Evelyn-Elizabeth Countess of Ancaster.
Cecilia-Margaret Countess Carrington.
Margaret-Etrenne-Hannah Countess of Crewe.
Alice- Anne Countess Egerton.
Wilhelmina Countess of Halsbury.
Nora-Henrietta Countess Roberts.
Katherine-Georgiana Louisa Countess of Cromer.
366 APPENDIX I
VISCOUNTESSES.
Mary Viscountess Falkland.
Margaret Viscountess Dowager Strathallan.
Kathleen Viscountess Falmouth.
Emmeline Viscountess Dowager Torrington.
Edith Viscountess Hood.
Georgina-Jane Viscountess Gormanston.
Robina-Marion Viscountess Mountgarret
£ilia Viscountess Dillon.
ecilia-Maria-Charlotte Viscountess Downe.
Agnes Viscountess Molesworth.
Katharine-Frances Viscountess Boyne.
Mary-Isabella Viscountess Barrington.
Vere Viscountess Galway.
Julia Viscountess Powerscourt.
Dorothy-Katherine Viscountess Southwell.
Anne-Francis Viscountess Lifford.
Elizabeth Viscountess Bangor.
Mary Viscountess Clifden.
Florence-Elizabeth Viscountess Ferrard.
Edith-Caroline-Sophia Viscountess Monck.
Violet-Marie-Louise Viscountess Melville.
Eleanor Viscountess Gort.
Edith Viscountess Dowager Exmouth.
Mary-Frances Viscountess Hardinge.
Agnes-Elizabeth Viscountess Halifax.
Caroline Dowager Viscountess Sherbrooke.
Susan-Henrietta Viscountess Hampden.
Louisa Viscountess Wolseley.
Margaret-Jean Viscountess Knutsford.
Eleanor Viscountess Esher.
Verena-Maud Viscountess Churchill.
BARONESSES.
Mary-Geraldine Lady De Ros.
Mary-Margaret Dowager Lady Mowbray.
Mary Lady Mowbray.
Elizabeth-Evelyn Lady Hastings.
Margaret Lady Clinton.
Violet Dowager Lady Beaumont.
Ethel-Mary Dowager Lady Beaumont.
Mary Dowager Lady Conyers.
Alberta- Victoria-Sarah-Caroline Lady Windsor.
Helen-Charlotte Lady St John of Bletso.
Blanche Dowager Lady Howard de Walden.
Marie-Hanem Lady Dormer.
Mabel Lady Teynham.
Lucy Lady Byron.
Mabel Lady Clifford of Chudleigh.
Marion-Margaret-Violet Lady Manners of Haddon.
Catherine-Sarah Lady Barnard.
Louisa Dowager Lady Forbes.
Mary-Eleanor Lady Saltoun.
Eveleen Baroness Gray.
Margaret-Jane Lady Sinclair.
Mary-Beresford Lady Sempill.
Angela-Mary-Charlotte Lady Herries.
Susanna-Mary Lady Borthwick.
Mary Baroness Kinloss.
Katherine-Eliza Lady Balfour of Burleigh.
Grace Lady Napier.
APPENDIX I 367
Fanny-Georgiana-Jane Lady Reay.
Blanche-Alice Lady Elibank.
Georgina Dowager Lady Belhaven and Stenton.
Georgina-Katherine Lady Belhaven and Stenton.
Caroline-Annesley Lady Ruthven.
Eliza-Maria Lady Middleton.
Augusta-Louisa-Caroline Dowager Lady Monson.
Cecilia-Constance Lady Boston.
Emily-Beryl-Sissy Lady Digby.
Jane Dowager Lady Hawke.
Evelyn-Vaughan Lady Foley.
Alice Lady Grantley.
Ellen Dowager Lady Berwick.
Emily-Theresa Lady Sherborne.
Mary-Ann-Williams Lady Fisherwick.
Maud-Augusta-Louisa Lady Calthorpe.
Charlotte-Monckton Lady Ribblesdale.
Ernle-Elizabeth-Louisa-Maria-Grosvenor Dowager Lady Dunsany.
Caroline-Maude-Blanche-Lady Dunboyne.
Ellen-Harriet Dowager Lady Inchiquin.
Ethel-Jane Lady Inchiquin.
Florence-Jane Dowager Lady Farnham.
Grace-Bruce Lady Newborough.
Constance Lady Muncaster.
Augusta-Caroline Lady Clonbrock.
Alice-Frances Lady Teignmouth.
Clara-Campbell-Lucy Dowager Lady Henley.
Augusta-Frederica Lady Henley.
Lucienne Lady de Blaquiere.
Mary-Frances Lady Dunalley.
Violet-Grace Lady Ashtpwn.
Sophia-Mary Lady Clarina.
Julia-Janet-Georgiana Lady Abercromby.
Beatrice-Joanna Dowager Lady Ellenborough.
Lydia-Sophia Dowager Lady Manners.
Constance-Edwina Lady Manners.
Annie-Evelyn Lady Castlemaine.
Catherine Dowager Lady Decies.
Maria-Gertrude Lady Decies.
Lucy-Ada Lady Harris.
Isabella-Grace-Maud Lady Colchester.
Alice-Florence Lady Garvagh.
Florence-Ame Lady Delamere.
Emma-Georgina Lady Forester.
Evelyn-Georgiana-Mary Lady Rayleigh.
Sophie-Catherine Lady Gifford.
Emma-Mary Dowager Lady Tenterden.
Florence-Sarah-Wilhelmine Lady Poltimore.
Mary-Florence-Edith Lady Mostyn.
Victoria-Elizabeth Lady Templemore.
Helen Dowager Lady Abinger.
Elizabeth-Maria Lady De L'Isle and Dudley.
Leonora-Caroline Dowager Lady Ashburton.
Mabel-Edith Lady Ashburton.
Charlotte- Louisa Lady Hatherton.
Louisa-Mary Lady Stratheden.
Mary-Ethel Lady Methuen.
Emily-Julia Lady Lurgan.
Elizabeth Lady Monteagle of Brandon.
Elizabeth-Beatrice Lady Seaton.
Elizabeth-Peter Lady Congleton.
368 APPENDIX I
Augusta Dowager Lady Bellew.
Mildred-Mary-Josephine Lady Bellew.
Marie-Georgiana Lady De Freyne.
Marian-Caroline Lady Saint Leonards.
Ethel-Jemima Lady Raglan.
Margaret Lady Belper.
Cecilia Lady Fermoy.
Beatrice-Constance Lady Chesham.
Barbara Lady Churston.
Adora-Frances-Olga Lady Brougham and Vaux.
Agatha-Manners Lady Westbury.
Anne Dowager Lady Hylton.
Alice-Adeliza Lady Hylton.
Gertrude- Jessy Lady Penrhyn.
Mary-Cecilia Dowager Lady Napier (of Magdala).
Eva-Maria-Louisa Lady Napier (of Magdala).
Mary-Caroline-Douglas Lady Lawrence.
Winifred-Mary Dowager Lady Howard of Glossop.
Edith-Amelia Lady Wolverton.
Alice-Mary Dowager Lady O'Hagan.
Constance-Mary Lady Aberdare.
Amy-Augusta-Jackson Dowager Lady Coleridge.
Augusta-Henrietta Lady Cottesloe.
Evelyn-Nina-Frances Lady Hampton.
Evelyn-Henrietta Lady Alington.
Constance-Mary Lady Haldon.
Olivia-Charlotte Lady Ardilaun.
Rosamond-Catherine Lady Trevor.
Ethel-Mary Dowager Lady Brabourne
Emily-Theresa Dowager Lady Ampthill.
Fanny-Octavia-Louisa Lady Tweedmouth.
Emma-Louisa Lady Rothschild.
Frances-Maria-Adelaide Lady Ashbourne.
Mabel-Susan Lady Saint Oswald.
Alice Marian Lady Hillingdon.
Harriet-Georgina Lady Burton.
Sybil-de-Vere Lady Brassey.
Elizabeth-Clementina Lady Saint Levan.
Evelyn-Harriet Lady Magheramorne.
Mary Lady Basing.
Rosamond-Jane-Frances Lady De Ramsey.
Mary-Adelaide Lady Addington.
Gertrude- Violet Lady Savile.
Adelaide-Maria Lady Iveagh.
Gian Lady Mount Stephen.
Susan-Agnes Baroness Macdonald of Earnscliffe.
Fanny-Henrietta Dowager Lady Hood of Avalon.
Frances-Anna Lady Kelvin.
Louisa-Mary Dowager Lady Knightley.
Laura Lady Ashcombe.
Augusta-Clementina Lady Blythswood.
Catherine Lady Crawshaw.
Margaret-Susan Lady Amherst of Hackney.
Norah-Louisa-Fanny Lady Dunleath.
Georgiana-Marcia Lady Llangattock.
Augusta-Mary Lady Playfair.
Constance Lady Battersea.
Averil Dowager Lady Swansea.
Katherine-Euphemia Dowager Lady Farrer.
Grace-Eliza Lady Overtoun.
Susan-Louisa Lady Hawkesbury.
APPENDIX I
369
Louisa-Hawes Lady Davey.
Jessy-Henrietta Lady Ashton.
Winifred-Anne-Henrietta-Christine Lady Burghclere.
Sarah Lady Pirbright.
Eleanor-Cecilia Lady Heneage.
Edith-Louisa Lady Rosmead.
Mary Lady Inverclyde.
Isabella-Sophia Lady Strathcona and Mount Royal.
Emilie Lady Farquhar.
Mary-Montgomerie Lady Currie.
Emily-Frances Lady Cranworth.
Henrietta-Anne Baroness Dorchester.
Philadelphia-Mary-Lucy Lady Robertson.
Alice Lady Northcote.
Annie Lady O'Brien.
Marianne-Eliza Lady Kinross.
Elizabeth Lady Barrymore.
Ardyn Lady Knollys.
No. 5. — ARCHBISHOPS' AND BISHOPS' WIVES AND DAUGHTERS.
Mrs Temple.
The Honourable Mrs Maclagan.
Miss Theodora Maclagan.
Mrs Handley Moule.
Miss Mary E. E. Moule.
Mrs Randall Davidson.
Mrs Kennion.
Mrs Williams.
Mrs Bardsley.
Miss Mabel E. Bardsley.
Mrs Ernest Wilberforce.
Miss Emily Geraldine Wilber-
force.
Mrs Percival.
The Honourable Mrs Augustus
Legge.
Miss Beatrice Legge.
Mrs Moorhouse.
Mrs Sheepshanks.
Miss Sheepshanks.
The Lady Mary Glyn.
Miss Margaret F. Glyn.
Mrs Boyd-Carpenter.
Miss May Boyd-Carpenter.
The Honourable Mrs E. S.
Talbot.
Miss Mary C. Talbot.
Mrs Alfred Edwards.
Miss Edwards.
Mrs Wordsworth.
Miss Margaret Wordsworth.
The Lady Laura Ridding.
Mrs Gott.
Miss Hilda Gott.
Mrs Owen.
Mrs Eden.
Miss Eden.
Mrs Chavasse.
Miss Dorothea Chavas
Mrs Herbert Ryle.
Mrs Straton.
Mrs Thomson.
Mrs Benson.
Miss Browne.
Mrs Ellicott.
Miss Ellicott.
Miss Alexander.
No. 6. — PRIVY COUNCILLORS (OTHER THAN PEERS) WITH THEIR
WIVES OR DAUGHTERS OR SISTERS.
i. CABINET RANK (PAST AND PRESENT).
The Right Honourable Lord George Hamilton, M.P.
The Lady George Hamilton.
The Right Honourable Charles Thomson Ritchie, M.P.
Mrs Ritchie.
The Right Honourable Joseph Chamberlain, M.P.
Mrs Chamberlain.
The Right Honourable William St John Fremantle Brodrick, M.P.
Miss Brodrick.
The Right Honourable Sir Michael Edward Hicks-Beach, Bart., M.P.
The Lady Lucy Hicks-Beach.
The Right Honourable Sir William George Granville Vernon Harcourt, M.P.
Lady Harcourt.
The Right Honourable George John Shaw Lefevre.
The Lady Constance Shaw Lefevre.
The Right Honourable Sir Charles Wentworth Dilke, Bart., M.P.
Lady Dilke.
The Right Honourable Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman, G.C.B., M.P.
Lady Campbell-Bannerman.
370 APPENDIX I
The Right Honourable Henry Chaplin, M.P.
Miss Chaplin.
The Right Honourable Arthur James Balfour, M.P.
Miss Balfour.
The Right Honourable John Morley, M.P.
Mrs Morley.
The Right Honourable Sir Henry Hartley Fowler, G. C.S.I., M.P.
Lady Fowler.
The Right Honourable William Lawies Jackson, M.P.i
Mrs Harrison Tinsley.
The Right Honourable Aretas Akers Douglas, M. P.
Mrs Akers Douglas.
The Right Honourable Arnold Morley.
Miss Morley.
The Right Honourable Herbert Henry Asquith, M.P.
Mrs Asquith.
The Right Honourable Arthur Herbert Dyke Acland.
Mrs Acland.
The Right Honourable James Bryce, M. P.
Mrs Bryce.
The Right Honourable Robert William Hanbury, M.P.
Mrs Hanbury.
The Right Honourable Walter Hume Long, M.P.
The Lady Dorothy Long.
The Right Honourable Gerald Balfour, M.P.
The Lady Betty Balfour.
2. AMBASSADORS.
The Right Honourable Sir E. J. Monson, G.C.B., G.C.M.G.
The Honourable Lady Monson.
The Right Honourable Sir F. C. LasceUes, G.C.B.. G.C.M.G.
Miss Lascelles.
The Right Honourable Sir N. R. O'Conor, G.C.B., G.C.M.G.
Lady O'Conor.
The Right Honourable Sir Charles S. Scott, G.C.B., G.C.M.G.
Lady Scott.
The Right Honourable Sir F. R. Plunkett, G.C.B., G.C.M.G.
Lady Plunkett.
The Right Honourable Sir H. Mortimer Durand, G.C.M.G.. K.C.S.I., K.C.I.E.
Lady Durand.
The Right Honourable Sir Michael M. Herbert, K.C.B.
The Honpurable Lady Herbert.
3 (a). ENGLISH JUDGES.
The Right Honourable The Lord Chief Justice (Lord Alverstone).2
The Honourable Dora M. Webster.
The Right Honourable The Master of the Rolls.
Lady Henn Collins.
The Right Honourable Sir Francis Jeune, K.C.B.
Lady Jeune.
The Right Honourable Lord Justice Vaughan Williams.
Lady Vaughan Williams.
The Right Honourable Lord Justice Romer, G.C.B.
Lady Romer.
The Right Honourable Lord Justice Stirling.
Lady Stirling.
1 Mr Jackson was made a Peer before the Coronation, and his name is also found
among the Barons who did homage, as Lord Allerton.
2 Lord Alverstone's name is put in this place in the Earl Marshal's list, although the
category is headed Privy Councillors other than Peers. The Lord Chief Justice was not
present at the Coronation owing to recent bereavement.
APPENDIX I 371
The Right Honourable Lord Justice Mathew.
Miss Mathew.
The Right Honourable Lord Justice Cozens-Hardy.
Miss Cozens-Hardy.
3 (<J). SCOTTISH JUDGES.
The Right Honourable The Lord Justice General of Scotland.1
The Honourable Mrs Balfour.
The Right Honourable The Lord Justice Clerk of Scotland, K.C.B.
The Right Honourable Lord Young.
Miss Young.
The Right Honourable Lord Pearson.
Lady Pearson.
4. OTHER PRIVY COUNCILLORS.
The Right Honourable Lord Walter Gordon-Lennox.
The Lady Walter Gordon-Lennox.
The Right Honourable Lord Henry Somerset.
The Lady Henry Somerset.
The Right Honourable Lord Henry Thynne.
The Lady Ulrica Thynne.
The Right Honourable Lord Arthur Hill.
The Lady Arthur Hill.
The Right Honourable William Court Gully, M.P. (Speaker of the House of Commons).
Mrs Gully.
The Right Honourable Anthony Evelyn Ashley.
The Lady Alice Ashley.
The Right Honourable Charles Robert Spencer, M.P.
The Honourable Mrs Spencer.
The Right Honourable Gerard James Noel.
The Lady Augusta Noel.
The Right Honourable Sir Frederick Peel, K.C.M.G.
Lady Peel.
The Right Honourable Sir James Fergusson, Bart., M.P., G.C.S.I., K.C.M.G.
The Right Honourable Sir Edward Thornton, G.C.B.
Miss F. A. Thornton.
The Right Honourable Sir John Charles Dalrymple Hay, Bart., K.C.B.
Miss Hay.
The Right Honourable James Lowther, M.P.
The Right Honourable Sir William Hart Dyke, Bart., M.P.
The Lady Emily Dyke.
The Right Honourable Sir Mountstuart Elphinstone Grant-Duff, G. C.S.I.
Lady Grant-Duff.
The Right Honourable Sir Edward Fry.
Lady Fry.
The Right Honourable Sir Edward Baldwin Malet, G.C.B., G.C.M.G.
The Lady Ermyntrude Malet.
The Right Honourable Sir Henry Drummond Wolff, G.C.B., G.C.M.G.
Lady Drummond Wolff.
The Right Honourable Sir Arthur John Otway, Bart.
Miss Otway.
The Right Honourable Sir Massey Lopes, Bart.
Lady Lopes.
The Right Honourable Sir John Tomlinson Hibbert, K.C.B.
The Right Honourable John William Mellor, M.P.
The Right Honourable Sir Ughtred James Kay-Shuttleworth, Bart., M.P.2
Miss Kay-Shuttleworth.
1 The Lord Justice General was made a Peer before the Coronation, and his name is
also iound among the Barons who did homage as Lord Kinross.
2 Sir U. Kay-Shuttleworth was raised to the peerage as Lord Shuttleworth before the
Coronation.
372 APPENDIX I
The Right Honourable Leonard Henry Courtney.
Mrs Courtney.
The Right Honourable Sir John Eldon Gorst, K.C., M.P.
Miss Gorst.
The Right Honourable Jesse Collings, M. P.
Mrs Collings.
The Right Honourable Charles Seale-Hayne.
The Right Honourable Christopher Palles (Lord Chief Baron of Ireland).
Miss Palles.
The Right Honourable Sir Algernon Edward West, K.C.B.
Mrs Van der Noot.
The Right Honourable Herbert John Gladstone, M. P.
Mrs Gladstone.
The Right Honourable Sir Arthur Divett Hayter, Bart., M.P.
Lady Hayter.
The Right Honourable Sir John Rigby.
The Right Honourable Sir Bernhard Samuelson, Bart.
Lady Samuelson.
The Right Honourable Sir Fleetwood Isham Edwards, G.C.V.O.. K.C.B.
Lady Edwards.
The Right Honourable Sir Richard Horner Paget, Bart.
Lady Paget.
The Right Honourable Francis John Savile Foljambe.
The Lady Gertrude Foljambe.
The Right Honourable Charles Beilby Stuart- Wortley, C.B., M.P.
Mrs Stuart- Wortley.
The Right Honourable Andrew Graham Murray, K.C. , M.P. (Lord Advocate).
Mrs Murray.
The Right Honourable Sir Horace Rumbold, Bart., G.C.B., G.C.M.G.
Lady Rumbold.
The Right Honourable Sir John Henry Kennaway, Bart., C.B., M.P.
Lady Kennaway.
The Right Honourable Sir John Gordon Sprigg, G.C.M.G.1
Miss Gordon Sprigg.
The Right Honourable Sir William Vallance Whiteway, K.C.M.G.
Lady Whiteway.
The Right Honourable Sir John Forrest, G.C.M.G.
Lady Forrest.
The Right Honourable William Edward Hartpole Lecky, O.M., M.P.
Mrs Lecky.
The Right Honourable John Gilbert Talbot, M.P.
The Honourable Mrs Talbot.
The Right Honourable John Lloyd Wharton, M.P.
The Right Honourable Sir Herbert Eustace Maxwell, Bart., M.P.
Lady Maxwell.
The Right Honourable Sir George Dashwood Taubman-Goldie, K.C.M.G.
Miss Alice Taubman-Goldie.
The Right Honourable James Alexander Campbell, M.P.
Miss E. L. Campbell.
The Right Honourable James William Lowther, M.P.
Mrs Lowther.
The Right Honourable Edmund Robert Wodehouse, M.P.
Mrs Wodehouse.
The Right Honourable Colonel Edward James Saunderson.
The Honourable Mrs Saunderson.
The Right Honourable William Kenrick.
Mrs Kenrick.
1 Sir Gordon Sprigg, Prime Minister of Cape Colony, was compelled to return to
South Africa before the postponed Coronation.
APPENDIX I 373
The Right Honourable Sir William Hood Walrond, Bart., M.P.
Lady Walrond.
The Right Honourable Sir Ford North.
Lady North.
The Right Honourable Sir Frederick George Milner, Bart., M.P.
Lady Milner.
The Right Honourable Joseph Powell- Williams, M.P.
Mrs Powell-Williams.
The Right Honourable William Grey Ellison Macartney, M.P.
Mrs Macartney.
The Right Honourable Lewis Fry.
Miss E. Fry.
The Right Honourable Thomas Frederick Halsey, M. P.
Mrs Halsey.
The Right Honourable Sir Henry Fletcher, Bart., C.B., M.P.
Lady Fletcher.
The Right Honourable Sir Andrew Richard Scoble, K.C.S.I.
Lady Scoble.
The Right Honourable Sir Arthur Wilson, K.C.I.E.
The Right Honourable Sir John C. Day.
Lady Day.
The Right Honourable Sir John Winfield Bonser.
Lady Bonser.
The Right Honourable Sir John Dorington, Bart., M.P.
Lady Dorington.
The Right Honourable Sir Ernest Cassel, K.C.M.G.
The Right Honourable R. B. Haldane, M.P.
Miss Haldane.
The Rignt Honourable A. F. Jefferies, M.P.
These six Privy Councillors do not
appear in this category in the
Earl Marshal's list, having been
Mrs Jefferies.
The Right Honourable James Round, M.P.
Mrs Round.
The Right Honourable Austin Chamberlain, M.P.
Miss Chamberlain.
5. IRISH PRIVY COUNCILLORS.
The Right Honourable George Wyndham, M.P.
The Lady Sibell Wyndham (The Countess Grosvenor).
The Right Honourable The O'Conor Don.
Madame O'Conor Don.
The Right Honourable Mr Justice Johnson.
Mrs Johnson.
The Right Honourable Lord Justice Walker.
Mrs Walker.
The Right Honourable General Sir Redvers Buller, B.C. G.C.B., G.C.M.G.
sworn of the Privy Council after
the date originally fixed for the
Coronation.
The Lady Audrey Buller.
Miss Audrey C. G.
Irey C. G. Buller.
The Right Honourable Sir Henry Hervey Bruce, Bart.
The Right Honourable Mr Justice Madden.
Mrs Madden.
The Right Honourable The Attorney General for Ireland, M.P.
Mrs Atkinson.
The Right Honourable The MacDermot, K.C.
Madame MacDermot.
The Right Honourable Thomas Dickson.
Miss Edith Dickson.
The Right Honourable Charles Hemphill, M.P.
The Right Honourable Thomas. Sinclair.
The Right Honourable Arthur Smith Barry.1
1 Mr Smith Barry was made a Peer before the Coronation, and his name is found
among the Barons who did homage, as Lord Barrymore.
374
APPENDIX I
Mrs Smith Barry.
The Right Honourable Sir Edward Henry Carson, Solicitor-General, M.P.
Lady Carson.
The Right Honourable Horace Plunkett.
The Right Honourable William Pirrie.
Mrs Pirrie.
The Right Honourable Sir David Harrel, K.C.B.. K.C.V.O.
Lady Harrel.
No. 7. — MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS, NOT BEING PRIVY
COUNCILLORS, WITH THEIR WIVES OR DAUGHTERS OR SisxERS.1
The Honourable Alban Gibbs (City of
London).
Miss Catherine Gibbs.
Sir Albert Rollit (S. Islington).
Lady Rollit (Mary Duchess of Sutherland).
Mr Thos. P. Whittaker (Spen Valley).
Mrs Whittaker.
Mr William Jones (Carnarvon— Arfon).
Miss Jones.
Mr John Brigg (Keighley).
Mrs Sharpe.
Mr Percy M. Thornton (Clapham).
Mrs Thornton.
Mr T. L. Corbett (N. Down).
Mrs Corbett.
Sir J. F. Leese, K.C. (Accrington).
Lady Leese.
Colonel Royds (Rochdale).
Mrs Royds.
Sir Wm. Dunn, Bart. (Paisley).
Lady Dunn.
Sir Robert Mowbray, Bart. (Brixton).
Miss Mowbray.
Sir F. Dixon Hartland, Bart. (Uxbridge).
Lady Hartland.
Sir Robert Threshie Reid, K.C., G.C.M.G.
(Dumfries District).
Lady Reid.
Mr Vaughan Davies (Cardiganshire).
Mrs Davies.
Mr Charles H. Wilson (W. Hull).
Mrs Wilson.
Sir James Woodhouse (Huddersfield).
Lady Woodhouse.
Mr Joseph A. Pease (Saffron Walden).
Mrs Pease.
Mr Richard B. Martin (Droitwich).
Mrs Martin.
Mr Samuel Smith (Flintshire).
Miss Smith.
Sir John C. R.Colomb, K.C.M.G. (Yarmouth).
Lady Colomb.
The Honourable James Hozier (S. Lanark).
The Lady Mary Hozier.
Mr J. Parker Smith (Partick District).
Mrs Smith.
Mr Arnold Forster (W. Belfast).
Mrs Forster.
Mr James Reid (Greenock).
Miss Reid.
Sir William Holland (Rotherham).
Lady Holland.
Mr Alfred Davies (Caermarthen District).
Mrs Davies.
Mr Donald N. Nicol (Argyllshire).
Mrs Nicol.
Mr Batty Langley (Sheffield— Attercliffe).
Mrs Langley.
Mr Charles Allen (Stroud).
Mrs Allen.
Mr Russell Rea (Gloucester).
Mrs Rea.
Mr J. H. Yoxall (W. Nottingham).
Mrs Yoxall.
Mr J. G. Baird (Glasgow— Central).
Mrs Baird.
Mr T. Willans Nussey (Pontefract).
Mrs Nussey.
Mr Robert Cameron (Houghton-le-Spring).
Miss Cameron.
Mr Frank Edwards (Radnorshire).
Mrs Edwards.
Mr D. H. Coghill (Stoke-on-Trent).
Mrs Coghill.
Colonel Bain (Egremont).
Mrs Bain.
The Honourable George Kenyon (Denbigh
District).
The Honourable Mrs Kenyon.
Mr Jas. Tomkinson (Crewe).
Mrs Tomkinson.
'Colonel Henry Bowles (Enfield).
Mrs Bowles.
Mr J. Rutherford (Darwen).
1 The order in which these names are printed is that of the Speaker's List, as rendered
to the Earl Marshal. The Earl Marshal's Office is, therefore, not responsible for any
inaccuracies or omissions which may be found in the list. The names of the constituency
of each Member has been added as useful for future reference.
APPENDIX I
375
Sir Harry Bullard (Norwich).
Lady Bullard.
Mr Alfred Jacoby (Mid-Derbyshire).
Mrs Jacoby.
Mr F. S. Stevenson (Eye).
Mrs Stevenson.
Mr Maurice Levy (Loughborough).
Mrs Levy.
Colonel F. Lucas (Lowestoft).
Mrs Lucas.
Mr T. C. T. Warner (Lichfield).
The Lady Leucha Warner.
Mr J. Aeron Thomas (West Glamorgan).
Mrs Thomas.
The Viscount Valentia (Oxford).
The Viscountess Valentia.
Sir Gilbert Parker (Gravesend).
Lady Parker.
Colonel Stopford Sackville (North Northants).
Miss Stopford Sackville.
Sir R. Hermon-Hodge, Bart. (Henley).
Lady Hermon-Hodge.
Mr Herbert Whiteley (Halifax).
Mrs Whiteley.
Mr Chas. E. Shaw (Stafford).
Mrs Shaw.
Mr Frederick Cawley (Prestwick).
Mrs Cawley.
Mr Robert E. Dickinson (Wells).
Miss Violet Mary Dickinson.
Mr A. W. Maconochie (Aberdeenshire).
Miss Maconochie.
Mr Frederick G. Banbury (Peckham).
Mrs Banbury.
Mr Kenneth R. Balfour (Christchurch).
Mr D. J. Morgan (Walthamstow).
Mrs Morgan.
Mr Arthur Lee (Fareham).
Mrs Lee.
The Lord Cecil Manners (Melton).
The Lady Elizabeth E. Manners.
Mr Raymond Greene (Chesterton).
Mr W. R. Plummer (Newcastle-on-Tyne).
Mf Edward Hain (St Ives).
Mrs Hain.
Mr Henry Broadhurst (Leicester).
Miss Broadhurst.
Mr Ernest Flower (West Bradford).
Miss Flower.
Mr W. A. Mount (Newbury).
Mrs Mount.
Colonel E. Tufnell (South-East Essex).
Mrs Tufnell.
Mr Coningsby Disraeli (Altrincham).
Mrs Disraeli.
Mr F. A. Channing (East Northants).
Miss Channing.
Mr George Faber (York).
Mrs Faber.
Mr Fred. Horner (North Lambeth).
Mrs Horner.
Mr J. T. Agg-Gardner (Cheltenham).
Miss Agg-Gardner.
Mr Walter Palmer (Salisbury).
Mrs Palmer.
Mr Leigh-Bennett (Chertsey).
Mrs Leigh-Bennett.
Sir Charles Welby. Bart. (Newark).
Lady Welby.
The Honourable Robert T. O'Neill (Mid-
Antrim).
Mr F. A. Newdegate (Nuneaton).
The Honourable Mrs Newdegate.
The Lord Stanley (Westhoughton, S.-E.
Lanes.).
The Lady Alice Stanley.
Mr A. G. Boscawen (Tonbridge).
Mrs Boscawen.
Mr J. M. F. Fuller (Westbury).
Mrs Fuller.
Sir Charles Dalrymple, Bart. (Ipswich).
Miss Dalrymple.
The Lord Balcarres (Chorley).
The Lady Balcarres.
Mr G. H. Finch (Rutland).
Miss Finch.
Colonel Warde (Medway).
Mrs Warde.
Sir John Stirling-Maxwell, Bart. (Glasgow —
College).
Lady Stirling-Maxwell
Mr Allhusen (Hackney— Central).
Mrs Allhusen.
Sir Walter Greene, Bart. (Bury St Edmunds).
Miss Greene.
Mr Wentworth Beaumont (Hexham).
The Lady Alexandrina Beaumont.
Mr C. A. Cripps (Stretford).
Miss Cripps.
Sir S. Crossley, Bart. (Halifax).
Lady Crossley.
Mr W. A. M'Arthur (St Austell).
Mrs M'Arthur.
Mr Arthur H. Aylmer Morton (Deptford).
Mr G. W. E. Loder (Brighton).
The Lady Louise Loder.
Mr Abel Thomas (East Caermarthen).
Miss Abel Thomas.
Mr William J. Bull (Hammersmith).
Mrs Bull.
Sir Frederick Cook, Bart. (Kennington).
Lady Cook.
Mr R. Lucas (Portsmouth).
Mr C. Bill (Leek).
Mrs Bill.
Mr D. Ford Goddard (Ipswich).
Mrs Goddard.
Mr Luke White (Buckrose, York, E.R.).
Mrs White.
The Honourable W. Peel (S. Manchester).
The Honourable Mrs Peel.
Mr J. Grant Lawson (Thirsk and Malton).
376
APPENDIX I
Mrs Lawson.
Sir George Newnes, Bart. (Swansea).
Lady Newnes.
The Honourable Claude G. Hay (Hoxton).
Mr J. G. Shipman (Northampton).
Mr W. M. Guthrie (Bow and Bromley).
Mrs Guthrie.
Mr W. G. Nicholson ( Petersfield).
Mrs Nicholson.
Mr Wingfield Digby (N. Dorset).
Mrs Digby.
Mr John Howard (Faversham).
The Honourable Mrs Howard.
Mr Beresford V. Melville (Stockport).
Mrs Melville.
Mr E. F. G. Hatch (Gorton).
The Lady Constance Hatch.
Mr Charles Scott Dickson (Bridgeton, Glas-
gow).
Mrs Dickson.
Mr J. H. Dalziel (Kirkcaldy district).
Mrs Dalziel.
Mr T. Milvain (Hampstead).
Mrs Milvain.
Mr J. G. Butcher (York).
Mrs Butcher.
Mr Ernest Gardner (Wokingham).
Miss Gardner.
Sir James Rankin, Bart. (Leominster).
Lady Rankin.
Mr J. W. Crombie (Kincardineshire).
Mrs Crombie.
The Honourable G. OrmsbyGore(Oswestry).
The Lady Margaret Ormsby Gore.
Sir Frederick Wills, Bart. (N. Bristol).
Lady Wills.
Mr H. D. Greene (Shrewsbury).
Mrs Greene.
Mr B. L. Cohen (E. Islington).
Miss Cohen.
Lieu tenant-General Laurie (Pembroke Dis-
trict).
Mrs Laurie.
Mr A. Osmond Williams (Merionethshire).
Mrs Williams.
Mr Norval W. Helme (Lancaster).
Mrs Helme.
Mr Eugene Wason (Clackmannan).
Mrs Wason.
Sir John Brunner, Bart. (Northwich).
Lady Brunner.
Sir M. M. Bhownaggree, K.C.I.E. (N.-E.
Bethnal Green).
Lady Bhownaggree.
Mr E. Boulnois (E. Marylebone).
Miss Boulnois.
Sir Samuel Scott, Bart. (W. Marylebone).
Mr J. Lloyd Morgan (W. Carmarthenshire).
Mr John Wilson (Mid-Durham).
Mrs Wilson.
Mr T. Dolling Bolton (N.-E. Derbyshire).
Mr Walter Carlile (Buckingham).
Mrs Carlile.
Sir Alexander Henderson, Bart. ( W. Stafford-
shire).
Lady Henderson.
Major Rasch (Chelmsford).
The Lord Alwyn Compton (Biggleswede).
The Lady Alwyn Compton.
Lieutenant-Colonel Welby (Taunton).
Mrs Welby.
Mr W. Burdett-Coutts (Westminster).
The Lord Willoughby de Eresby(Horncastle).
The Lady Nina Heathcote Drummond
Willoughby.
Mr Ernest Gray (N. West-Ham).
MrWilson-Todd(Howdenshire, Yorks, E.R.)
Mrs Wilson-Todd.
Mr R. J. Price (E. Norfolk).
Mrs Price.
Mr H. C. Richards, K.C. (K. Finsbury).
Miss Richards.
Sir Alfred Thomas (E. Glamorgan).
Miss Thomas.
Captain H. M. Jessel (S. St Pancras).
Mrs Jessel.
Mr Arthur Soames (S. Norfolk).
Mrs Soames.
The Lord Charles Beresford (Woolwich).
The Lady Charles Beresford.
Sir William Allan (Gateshead).
Lady Allan.
Sir Francis Evans, Bart., K.C.M.G. (Maid-
stone).
Lady Evans.
Sir Charles Cayzer ( Barrow-in-Furness).
Lady Cayzer.
Mr Remnant (Holborn).
Mrs Remnant.
Mr Lowe (Edgbaston).
Mrs Lowe.
Sir R. Penrose Fitzgerald, Bart. (Cambridge).
Lady Fitzgerald.
Mr Platt-Higgins (N. Salford).
Mrs Platt-Higgins.
Mr Groves (S. Salford).
Mrs Groves.
Mr W. R. Bousfield (N. Hackney).
Mrs Bousfield.
Sir William Rattigan (N.E. Lanark).
Lady Rattigan.
MrW. E. Thompson Sharpe (N.Kensington).
Mrs Sharpe.
Mr Purvis (Peterborough).
Mrs Purvis.
Mr Skewes-Cox (Kingston).
Miss Evelyn M. Skewes-Cox.
Colonel The Honourable Heneage Legge
(St George's, Hanover Square).
The Lady Charlotte Legge.
Sir William E. M. Tomlinson, Bart. (Preston).
APPENDIX I
377
Miss Tomlinson.
Mr Herbert Robertson (S. Hackney).
Mrs Robertson.
Mr Wallace, K.C. (Perth).
Miss Wallace.
Captain John Sinclair (Forfarshire).
Mr H. Pike Pease (Darlington).
Mrs A. M. Pease.
Mr Hudson E. Kearley (Devonport).
Mrs Kearley.
The Viscount Cranborne (Rochester).
The Viscountess Cranborne.
Mr Gumming Macdona (Rotherhithe).
Mr H. R. Graham (W. St Pancras).
Mr J. Cathcart Wason ( Orkney and Shetland).
Mrs Wason.
Mr Humphreys-Owen (Montgomeryshire).
Miss Humphreys-Owen.
Mr G. W. Palmer (Reading).
Mrs Palmer.
Mr D. V. Pirie(N. Aberdeen).
The Honourable Mrs Pirie.
Mr T. W. Russell (S. Tyrone).
Mrs Russell.
Mr Crawford Smith (Tyneside).
Mrs Crawford Smith.
Sir Francis Sharp Powell, Bart. (Wigan).
Lady Powell.
Mr John Wilson (Falkirk).
Mrs Wilson.
Sir Edgar Vincent, K.C.M.G. (Exeter).
The Lady Helen Vincent.
Major Banes (S. West Ham).
Mrs Banes.
Sir Richard Claverhouse Jebb (Cambridge
University).
Lady Jebb.
Mr Victor Cavendish (N. Lonsdale).
The Lady Evelyn Cavendish.
Mr Colston (Thornbury).
Mrs Colston.
Mr Worsley Taylor, K.C. (Blackpool).
Miss Worsley Taylor.
Mr T. L. Hare (S.W. Norfolk).
Miss Dorothy Hare.
Mr F. Leverton Harris (Tynemouth).
Mrs Leverton Harris.
Mr Brooke Robinson (Dudley).
The Honourable Humphrey Sturt(E. Dorset).
Miss Sturt.
Mr John Hutton (Richmond, Yorks).
Mr James Caldwell (Mid-Lanark).
Miss Caldwell.
Mr W. H. Myers (Winchester).
Mrs Myers.
Mr Edward Chapman (Hyde).
Mrs Chapman.
Mr Henry Tollemache (Eddisbury).
Mr J. S. Randies (Cockermouth).
Mrs Randies.
Mr H. R. Mansfield (Spalding).
Mrs Mansfield.
Mr David Maclver (Kirkdale and Liverpool).
Miss Maclver.
Mr Henry Kimber (Wandsworth).
Miss Kimber.
Mr J. Henniker-Heaton (Canterbury).
Mrs Henniker-Heaton.
Mr Philip S. Foster (Stratford-on-Avon).
Mrs Foster.
Colonel Blundell (Ince).
Miss Blundell.
Sir I^wis M'lver, Bart. (W. Edinburgh).
Miss M'lver.
Mr Shepherd Cross (Bolton).
Mrs Shepherd Cross.
Lieutenant-Colonel C. H. Seely (Lincoln).
Mrs Seely.
Mr Charles Morley (Brecknockshire).
Mrs Morley.
Colonel Wyndham Murray (Bath).
Mrs Wyndham Murray.
Sir Albert Muntz, Bart. (Tamworth).
Lady Muntz.
Sir A. F. Godson (Kidderminster).
Lady Godson.
Sir Ernest Spencer (West Bromwich).
Lady Spencer.
Mr Corrie Grant (Rugby).
Mrs Grant.
Mr Alexander Hargreaves Brown (Welling-
ton, Salop).
Mrs Hargreaves Brown.
Mr George Harwood (Bolton).
Miss Harwood.
Mr S. Forde Ridley (S.W. Bethnal Green).
Mrs Ridley.
Mr Edward Goulding (Devizes).
Miss Goulding.
Mr J. A. Morrison (Wilton).
The Honourable Mrs Morrison.
Mr A. Priestley (Grantham).
Miss Priestley.
Sir Alfred Haslam (Newcastle-under-Lyme).
Lady Haslam.
Mr Herbert Roberts (W. Denbighshire).
Mrs Roberts.
Mr John Gretton (S. Derbyshire).
Miss Gretton.
Mr T. G. Ashton (Luton).
Mrs Ashton.
Sir Elliott Lees, Bart. (Birkenhead).
Lady Lees.
Captain Norton (W. Newington).
Miss Norton.
Mr A. K. Loyd (Abingdon).
Mrs Loyd.
Lieutenant-Colonel Llewellyn (N. Somerset).
Mrs Llewellyn.
Lieutenant-Colonel C. W. Long (Evesham).
Mrs Long.
Sir Charles McLaren, Bart., K.C. (Bosworth).
378
APPENDIX I
Lady McLaren.
Sir Theodore Doxford (Sunderland).
Lady Doxford.
Mr C. B. Balfour (Hornsey).
The Lady Nina Balfour.
Mr W. H. Fisher (Fulham).
Mrs Fisher.
Mr J. H. Johnstone (Horsham).
Miss Johnstone.
Mr F. B. Mildmay (Totnes).
Miss Mildmay.
Sir William Coddington, Bart. (Blackburn).
Lady Coddington.
Mr Frederick Wilson (M. Norfolk).
Mrs Wilson.
Mr Charles McArthur (Liverpool, Exchange).
Mrs McArthur.
Sir W. H. Hornby, Bart. (Blackburn).
Lady Hornby.
Sir Thomas Wrightson, Bart. (E. St Pancras).
Lady Wrightson.
Mr C. Eric Hambro (Wimbledon).
Mrs Hambro.
The Honourable H. Cubitt (Reigate).
The Honourable Mrs Cubitt.
Mr F. Layland-Barratt (Torquay).
Mrs Layland-Barratt.
Mr H. E. Duke, K.C. (Plymouth).
Mrs Duke.
Mr Joseph Hoult (Wirral).
Miss Hoult.
The Honourable C. H. Strutt (Maldon).
Mr D. A. Thomas (Merthyr Tydvil).
Mrs Thomas.
Mr James Bigwood (Brentford).
Mrs Bigwood.
Sir H. Seton-Karr (St Helens).
Lady Seton-Karr.
Mr A. H. Heath (Hanley).
Mrs Heath.
Mr E. Marshall Hall, K.C. (Southport).
Mrs Marshall Hall.
Mr Stuart M. Samuel (Whitechapel).
Mrs Samuel.
Sir James Joicey, Bart (Chester-le-Street).
Lady Joicey.
Sir Samuel Hoare, Bart. (Norwich).
Lady Hoare.
Mr James F. Hope (Brightside, Sheffield).
Mrs Hope.
Mr F. Whitley Thomson (Skipton).
Mrs Thomson.
Sir William Anson, Bart. (Oxford University).
Miss Anson.
Sir Joseph Leigh (Stockport).
Lady Leigh.
Mr Frederick W. Fison (Doncaster).
Mrs Fison.
Mr Abel H. Smith (Hertford).
The Honourable Mrs Smith.
Mr John Penn (Lewisham).
Miss Penn.
Mr P. A. Clive (Ross, Herefordshire).
Miss Clive.
Sir T. Roe (Derby).
Mr L. Sinclair (Romford).
Mrs Sinclair.
Mr Robson, K.C. (South Shields).
Mrs Robson.
Mr Richard Rigg (Appleby).
Mr W. H. Grenfell (Wycombe).
Mrs Grenfell.
Sir Walter Thorburn (Peebles and Selkirk).
Lady Thorburn.
Mr Albert Brassey (Banbury).
The Honourable Mrs Brassey.
Mr Laurence Hardy (Ashford).
Mrs Hardy.
Sir Henry Meysey-Thompson, Bart. (Hands-
worth).
Lady Meysey-Thompson.
Sir John Aird, Bart. (Paddington).
Lady Aird.
Mr John Wilson (Durham).
Mrs Wilson.
Sir A. Hickman (W. Wolverhampton).
Miss Hickman.
Mr Edward J. Stanley (Bridgewater).
The Honourable Mrs Stanley.
Mr Guy Pym (Bedford).
Mrs Pym.
Colonel Webb (Kingswinford).
Mrs Webb.
Mr Edward Thompson (N. Monaghan).
Mrs Thompson.
Mr J. Hastings Duncan (Otley).
Mrs Duncan.
Mr George White (N.W. Norfolk).
Miss White.
Colonel Sir R. Ropner (Stockton-on-Tees).
Lady Ropner.
Mr Lees Knowles (W. Salford).
Lieutenant-Colonel E. Pryce-Jones (Mont-
gomery District).
Mrs Pryce-Jones.
Mr D. Brynmor Jones, K.C. (Swansea
District).
Mrs Brynmor Jones.
Mr Reginald M'Kenna (N. Monmouth).
Miss M'Kenna.
Mr T. C. Taylor (Radcliffe).
Mrs Taylor.
Mr W. J. Herries Maxwell (Dumfriesshire).
Mrs Maxwell.
Mr Garfit (Boston).
Mrs Garfit.
Mr H. Norman (S. Wolverhampton).
Mrs Norman.
Mr Samuel Roberts (Eccleshall).
Mrs Roberts.
The Lord Hugh Cecil (Greenwich).
Sir Fortescue F. Flannery (Shipley).
APPENDIX I
379
Lady Flannery.
Mr R. K. Causton (W. Southwark).
Mrs Causton.
Sir George Hartley, K.C.B. (N. Islington).
Lady Bartley.
Sir Seymour King, K.C.I.E. (Hull).
Lady King.
Mr J. G. Weir (Ross and Cromarty).
Miss Weir.
The Honourable W. F. D. Smith (Strand).
The Lady Esther Smith.
Sir Benjamin Stone (E. Birmingham).
Lady Stone.
Mr J. H. Whitley (Ashton-under-Lyne).
Mrs Whitley.
Colonel J. M'Calmont (E. Antrim).
Mrs M'Calmont.
Sir James Kitson, Bart. (Colne Valley).
Miss Kitson.
Mr H. W. Forster (Sevenoaks).
The Honourable Mrs Forster.
Sir Thomas R. Dewar (Tower Hamlets).
Miss Janet Dewar.
The Honourable R. Greville (E. Bradford).
The Honourable Mrs Greville.
Mr George Renwick (Newcastle-on-Tyne).
Mrs Renwick.
Mr S. T. Evans (Mid-Glamorganshire).
The Honourable John Scott-Montagu (New
Forest).
The Lady Cecil Scott-Montagu.
The Lord Henry Cavendish-Bentinck (S.
Notts).
The Lady Henry Cavendish-Bentinck.
Mr R. L. Harmsworth (Caithness).
Miss Harmsworth.
Sir John Dickson-Poynder, Bart. (Chippen-
ham).
Lady Dickson-Poynder.
Mr H. Cust (Bermondsey).
Mrs Cust. .
Mr Anstruther (St Andrews).
The Honourable Mrs Anstruther.
Sir C. Furness, Bart. (Hartlepool).
Miss Furness.
Mr J. W. Wilson (N. Worcestershire).
Mrs Wilson.
Sir Mark Stewart, Bart. (Kirkcudbright).
Miss Stewart.
Mr Alexander Cross (Camlachie, Glasgow).
Miss Cross.
Mr Samuel Young (E. Cavan).
Mrs Young.
Mr Lawson Walton, K.C. (S. Leeds).
Mrs Walton.
Mr Ian Malcolm (Stowmarket).
Mrs Malcolm.
Sir Edward Strachey, Bart. (S. Somerset).
Lady Strachey.
The Honourable John Gordon (Elgin and
Nairn).
The Honourable Mrs Gordon.
Mr Walford D. Green (Wednesbury).
Mrs Green.
Mr Pretyman (Woodbridge).
The Lady Beatrice Pretyman.
Sir Thomas Firbank (E. Hull).
Lady Firbank.
The Honourable W. Massey Mainwaring
(Clerkenwell).
: He
The Honourable Mrs Mainwaring.
Mr James Heath (N.W. Staffordshire).
Mrs Heath.
Mr Freeman Thomas (Hastings).
The Honourable Mrs F. Thomas.
Mr Schwann (N. Manchester).
Mrs Schwann.
Mr Sydney Buxton (Poplar).
Mrs Buxton.
Mr L. A. Atherley-Jones (N.W. Durham).
Mrs Atherley-Jones.
Colonel Sadler (Middlesborough).
Mrs Sadler.
Mr Edward Bond (E. Nottingham).
Sir Lewis Molesworth, Bart. (Bodmin).
Lady Molesworth.
Sir Robert Finlay, K.C., A.G. (Inverness
District).
Lady Finlay.
Mr M. H. Shaw Stewart (E. Renfrew).
Mr Howard (Tottenham).
Miss Howard.
Mr Moon (N. St Pancras).
Mrs Moon.
Mr Lambert (South Molton).
Miss Lambert.
Mr G. B. Hudson (Hitchin).
Mrs Hudson.
Colonel R. Pilkington (Newton).
Mrs Pilkington.
Mr Paulton (Bishop Auckland).
Miss Paulton.
The Master of Elibank (Midlothian).
The Honourable Mrs Murray.
Lieutenant-Colonel Josceline Bagot (Kendal).
Mrs Bagot.
Mr Beckett (Whitby).
Miss Beckett.
Mr C. P. Scott (Leigh).
Mrs Scott.
Dr Farquharson (W. Aberdeenshire).
Mr James McKillop (Stirlingshire).
Mrs McKillop.
Sir William Arrol (S. Ayrshire).
Sir Walter Foster (Ilkestone).
Lady Foster.
Mr Joseph Walton (Barnsley).
Mrs Walton.
The Honourable S. Ormsby-Gore (Gains-
boro').
Mr F. S. Leveson-Gower (Sutherland).
Mr A. Stanley Wilson (Holderness).
38o
APPENDIX I
Mrs Wilson.
Mr C. L. Orr-Ewing (Ayr Districts).
The Lady Augusta Orr-Ewing.
Sir John Batty Tuke (Edinburgh and St
Andrews Universities).
Major John E. B. Seely (Isle of Wight).
Mrs Seely.
Sir Joseph Lawrence (Monmouth).
Lady Lawrence.
Mr W. Randal Cremer (Haggerston).
Miss Cremer.
Mr Higginbottom (West Derby, Liverpool).
Mrs Higginbottom.
Mr James Bailey (Walworth).
Mrs Bailey.
Mr Walter Runciman (Dewsbury).
Mrs Runciman.
The Honourable A. Lyttelton (Warwick and
Leamington).
The Honourable Mrs Lyttelton.
Mr J. Compton Rickett (Scarborough).
Mrs Rickett.
Mr J. H. Stock (Walton, Liverpool).
Mrs Stock.
Sir M. Foster, K.C.B. (London University).
Lady Foster.
Colonel H. McCalmont (Newmarket).
Mrs McCalmont.
Mr John E. Ellis (Rushcliffe).
Mrs Ellis.
Colonel Hall Walker (Widnes).
Mrs Walker.
Mr Leigh Clare (Eccles).
Mrs Clare.
The Honourable J. E. Gordon (Elgin and
Nairn).
Miss Gordon.
Mr Thomas Lough (W. Islington).
Miss Lough.
Mr James Majendie (Portsmouth).
Mrs Majendie.
Mr W. O'Doherty (N. Donegal).
Mrs O'Doherty.
Mr W. Keswick (Epsom).
Mrs Keswick.
Mr R. P. Houston (W. Toxteth).
Major Jameson (W. Clare).
Mrs Jameson.
Mr Richard Cavendish (N. Lonsdale).
The Lady Moyra Cavendish.
Mr John D. Hope (W. Fife).
Mrs Hope.
Mr R. W. Perks (South Lincolnshire).
Mrs Perks.
Mr Evelyn Cecil (Aston Manor).
The Hon. Mrs E. Cecil.
Colonel Denny (Kilmarnock District).
Mrs Denny.
Mr A. W. Black (Banffshire).
Mrs Black.
Sir Weetman Pearson, Bart. (Colchester).
Lady Pearson.
Sir John Rolleston (Leicester).
Lady Rolleston.
Mr E. A. Brotherton (Wakefield).
Mr John Stroyan (W. Perthshire).
Mrs Stroyan.
Mr G. H. Morrell (Woodstock).
Mrs Morrell.
Sir E. Durning Lawrence, Bart. (Truro).
Lady Lawrence.
Mr A. Emmott (Oldham).
Mrs Emmott.
Major Evans Gordon (Stepney).
Mrs Evans Gordon (Julia Marchioness of
Tweeddale.)
Mr E. Beckett Faber (Andover).
Sir C. Bine Renshaw, Bart. (W. Renfrew).
Lady Renshaw.
Mr A. Bonar Law (Blackfriars, Glasgow).
Mrs Law.
Colonel R. Williams (W. Dorset).
Mrs Williams.
Mr Winston Churchill (Oldham).
Mr W. Johnson Galloway (S.W. Manchester).
Mr Arthur Bignold (Wic'k District).
Miss Bignold.
Mr Charles Hobhouse (E. Bristol).
Mrs Hobhouse.
Mr J. Fletcher Moulton, K.C. (Launces-
ton).
Mrs Moulton.
Mr E. J. C. Morton (Devonport).
Miss Morton.
Mr G. Kemp (Heywood).
The Lady Beatrice Kemp.
Mr George M'Crae (E. Edinburgh).
Mrs M'Crae.
The Earl Percy (S. Kensington).
The Lady Victoria Percy.
•Mr Alex. Wylie (Dumbartonshire).
Mrs Wylie.
Sir Frederick Mappin, Bart. (Hallamshire,
Yorks).
Mr R. A. Yerburgh (Chester).
Mrs Yerburgh.
Mr A. Helder (Whitehaven).
Miss Helder.
Sir Edward Reed (Cardiff).
Miss Reed.
Mr Spencer Charrington (Mile-end).
Miss Charrington.
Sir William Houldsworth, Bart. (N.W.
Manchester).
Miss Houldsworth.
Mr George Whiteley (Pudsey).
Mrs Whiteley.
Mr J. B. Lonsdale (Mid-Armagh).
Mrs Lonsdale.
The Earl of Dalkeith (Roxburgh).
The Countess of Dalkeith.
Mr Henry Hobhouse (E. Somerset).
APPENDIX I
Miss Rachel Hobhouse.
Mr William Mitchell (Burnley).
Mrs Mitchell.
Mr H. S. Samuel (Limehouse).
Mrs Samuel.
The Honourable Vicary Gibbs (St Albans).
The Honourable Edith Gibbs.
Colonel Wyndham-Quin (S. Glamorgan).
The Lady Eva Wyndham-Quin.
Mr J. L. Carew (S. Meath).
Mrs Carew.
Mr Alex. Ure (Linlithgowshire).
Mrs Ure.
The Marquis of Hamilton (Londonderry).
The Marchioness of Hamilton.
Mr John Dewar (Inverness-shire).
Miss Dewar.
Sir Howard Vincent, K.C.M.G., C.B.
(Sheffield).
Lady Vincent.
Mr Lindsay Hogg (Eastbourne).
Mrs Hogg.
Mr R. Hunter Craig (Govan).
Mrs Craig.
Mr P. H. Can-ill (Newry).
Mrs Carvill.
Mr F. J. Horniman (Penryn and Falmouth).
Mrs Horniman.
Sir Joseph Pease, Bart. (Barnard Castle).
Miss Pease.
Mr W. F. Lawrence (Liverpool, Aber-
cromby).
Mrs Lawrence.
Sir William Mather (Rowendale).
Lady Mather.
Mr Robert Pierpoint (Warrington ).
Miss Pierpoint.
Colonel M. Lockwood (Epping).
Mrs Lockwood.
The Honourable A. Stanley (Ormskirk).
The Lady Isobel C. M. Gathorne-Hardy.
Mr J. S. Arkwright (Hereford).
Miss Arkwright. .
Mr J. Herbert Lewis (Flint District).
Mrs Lewis.
Mr Claude Lowther (Eskdale).
Miss Lowther.
Mr Richard Bell (Derby).
Mrs Bell.
Mr Samuel Moss (E. Derbyshire).
Mrs Moss.
Mr A. Asher (Elgin District).
Mrs Asher.
Mr W. Abraham (Rhondda).
MrR. J. More(Ludlow).
Mr G. M. Brown (Edinburgh, Central).
Captain Hill (W. Down).
Miss Hill.
Sir Andrew Agnew, Bart. (S. Edinburgh).
Lady Agnew.
Mr George Toulmin (Bury).
Mrs Toulmin.
Mr George Doughty (Great Grimsby).
Miss Doughty.
Mr Edmund Robertson, K.C. (Dundee).
Mr E. Parkes (Birmingham).
Mrs Parkes.
Mr Tritton (Norwood).
Mrs Tritton.
Mr H. J. Tennant (Berwickshire).
Mrs Tennant.
Mr John Burns (Battersea).
Mrs Burns.
Mr John W. Spear (Tavistock).
Mrs Spear.
The Honourable Thomas Cochrane (N.
Ayrshire).
The Lady Gertrude Cochrane.
Colonel A. M. Brookfield (Rye).
Mrs Brookfield.
Sir Joseph C. Dimsdale, Bart. (City of
London).
Mrs L. W. Dent.
Mr Thomas Bayley (Chesterfield).
Mrs Bayley.
Mr Ellis Griffith (Anglesey).
Sir Horatio Davies, K.C.M.G. (Chatham).
Lady Davies.
The Honourable M. W. Ridley (Stalybridge).
The Honourable Mrs Ridley.
Mr H. S. Cautley (E. Leeds).
Mrs Cautley.
No. 8. — FAMILIES OF PEERS OF ENGLAND, SCOTLAND, GREAT BRITAIN,
IRELAND, AND THE UNITED KINGDOM COLLECTIVELY — INCLUDING
PEERS WHO ARE MINORS, ELDEST SONS OF PEERS AND THEIR
WIVES, WIDOWS OF ELDEST SONS, AND BROTHERS OF PEERS ; AND
OTHER MEMBERS OF PEERS* FAMILIES.
DUKES. The Lady Caroline Gordon The Marquess of Tavistock.
Lennox. The Lady Ela Russell.
The Earl of Euston. The Lady Sarah Spencer-
The Lady Mary Howard.
The Lady Philippa Stewart. The Lady Alexandra Beau-
Churchill.
The Lady Anne Kerr.
The Lord Ralph Kerr.
clerk. The Lady Victoria Manners.
The Lady Gsvendolen Osborne. The Lady Marjorie Manners.
382
APPEN7DIX I
Charles
The Lord Roos. EARLS. The Honourable Mrs Cum
The Countess of Dalkeith. ming Bruce.
The Lady Constance Anne The Viscount I ngestre. The Lord Carnegie.
Douglas Scott The Lady Wilmot Ida Noreen The Lady Carnegie.
The Lady Victoria Campbell. "astjnSs- ...._.
The Earl of Hillsbrough. The Lord Herbert, M.V.O.
The Lady Muriel Fox Strang- The Lady Beatrix Herbert.
ways The Lady Muriel Herbert.
The Lady Mary Percy. The Lady Courtenay
The Marquess of Graham. The Lady Eleanor Howard.
The Lady Helen Violet The Viscount Folding.
Graham The L^X Mai7 Allce clare The Lord Balgome.
The Lady Isabel Innes Ker. Feilding. The Duke di Mondragoni.
The Lady Victoria Cavendish The Lady Muriel Bertie. The Duchess di Mondragoni.
Bentinck The Viscount Maidstone.
The Lady Florence Pelham The Viscountess Morpeth.
The Lord Norreys.
The Lady Norreys.
The Viscountess 'Parker.
The Lady Elizabeth
Gertrude Keppel.
The Lady Helena Mariota
Carnegie.
The Lord Elcho.
The Honourable
Ramsay.
The Honourable Mrs Charles
Ramsay.
Clinton.
The Lady Eileen Wellesley.
The Lady Caroline Grenville.
Major The Honourable
Thomas Brand.
The Lady Katharine Brand.
The Lady Alexandra Phyllis
Hamilton.
The Lady Mary Grosvenor.
MARQUESSES.
The Lady Margaret Kerr.
The Lady Margaret C. Stuart.
The Lady Edith Campbell.
The Earl of Kerry, D.S.O.
The Lady Agnes Townshend.
The Lady Gwendolen Cecil.
The Lady Robert Cecil.
The Lady Edward Cecil.
The Lady Beatrice Thynne.
The Earl of Yarmouth.
The Lady Jane Seymour.
The Countess of Bective.
The Lady Beatrice Taylour.
The Viscount Tumour.
The Earl of Rocksavage.
The Lady Lettice Joan
Cholmondeley.
The Viscountess Castlereagh.
The Lady Blanche Conyng-
ham.
The Lord Cochrane.
The Lady Grizel Winifred
Louisa Cochrane.
The Lady Ethel Keith
Falconer.
Mary The Lady Hilda Keith
Falconer.
The Viscount Deerhurst. The Lord Haddo.
The Viscountess Deerhurst. The Lady Marjorie Adeline
The Lady Dorothy Coventry. Gordon.
The Viscount Villiers. The Lady Margaret Knowles.
The Lady Beatrice Child The Honourable Mary Bruce.
Villiers.
The Lady Violet Poulett.
The Lady Mary Pepys.
The Lady Jane Lindsay.
The Lord Kilmarnock.
The Lady Kilmarnock.
The Lady Cecilia Webbe.
The Lord Garioch.
The Honourable George
Waldegrave Leslie.
The Lady Mildred E. Leslie.
The Lord Aberdour.
The Lord Montgomerie.
The Lady Sybil Montgomerie.
Lady Meredith Sinclair.
The Lady Victoria Murray.
The Viscountess Dalrymple.
The Lord Dalmeny.
The Lady Sybil Primrose.
The Lady Helen Jane Boyle.
The Lady Dorothea Hope.
The Viscount Lewisham.
The Lady Dorothy Legge.
The Lord Guernsey.
The Lady Violet Ella Finch.
The Lady Emily Margaret
Stanhope.
The Lady Evelyn Parker.
The Viscount Chewton.
The Lady Mary Ashburn-
ham.
The Lord Brooke.
The
The Lady Constance Erskine.
The Lord Douglas.
The Lady Margaret Jane The Lady Marjorie Greville.
Douglass Home. The Lady Theresa Fitz
The Lady Edith Drummond. william.
The Lord Glamis. The Lady Muriel North.
The Lady Glamis. The Lord Stavordale.
The Lady Blanche Frances The Lady Maud Agnes Bowes The Lady Helen Stavordale.
Conyngham.
The Lady Marjorie Brunde-
nell-Bruce.
The Lady Beatrice Pole-
Carew.
Lyon.
The Lord Garlics.
The Lady Isabel Stewart.
The Viscount Maitland.
The Viscountess Maitland.
The Lady Constance Mary The Lady Ada Maitland.
Butler. The Viscount Dupplin.
The Lady Mary Hervey. The Viscountess Dupplin.
The Earl of Cassillis. The Viscount Garnock.
The Lady Cecily Gathorne- The Viscountess Garnock.
Hardy. The Lady Christian August
The Earl of Ronaldshay. Bruce.
The Viscountess Cantelupe.
The Lady Margaret Sack-
ville.
The Lady Sarah Spencer.
The Honourable Emily Law-
less.
The Lord Apsley.
The Ladv Muriel Bathurst.
The Lord Hyde.
The Lady Edith Villiers.
Captain The Viscount Valle-
tort.
APPENDIX I
383
The Lady Ernestine Edg
cumbe.
The Viscount Ebrington.
The Viscountess Ebrington.
The Lady Susan Fortescue.
The Lady Margaret Herbert.
The Viscount Chelsea.
The Viscountess Chelsea.
The Viscount Dungarven.
The Lady Emily Nugent.
The Lady Mary Brabazon.
The Lady Ellen Lanibart.
The Viscount Moore.
The Lady Beatrice Moore.
The Lady Eva Forbes.
The Lord Clifton of Rath-
more.
The Lady Kathleen Bligh.
The Viscount Duncannon,
C.B.
The Viscountess Duncannon.
The Lady Mary Ponsonby.
The Lord Newtown-Butler.
The Lady Newtown-Butler.
The Lady Winifred Butler.
The Lady Winifred Gore.
The Lady Charlotte Elizabeth
Stopford.
The Lady Edith King
Tenison.
The Viscount Molyneux.
The Lady Gertrude Molyneux.
The Lord Gillford.
The Lady Gillford.
The Lady Katherine Meade.
The Viscount Dunluce.
The Lady Evelyn McDonnell.
The Lady Katherine Paken-
ham.
The Lady Evelyn Moreton.
The Lady Florence Bourke.
The Lady Mabel Margaret
Annesley.
The Viscount Cole.
The Lady Kathleen Cole.
The Lady Mabel Florence
Mary Crichton.
The Lady Hilda Clements.
The Lord Bingham.
The Lady Bingham.
The Viscount Corry.
The Lady Winifred Lowry
Corry.
The Lady Emily Bernard.
The Lady Evelyn Hely-
Hutchinson.
The Viscount Castlerosse.
The Viscountess Castlerosse.
The Lady Angela Forbes.
The Lord Courtenay.
The Earl of Gifford.
The Viscount Cranley.
The Lady Gwendolen Onslow.
The Lady Florence Pery.
The Lady Victoria Pery.
The Viscount Glentworth.
The Lord Pelharn.
The Lady Pelham.
The Lady Kathrine le Poer
Trench.
The Viscount Clive.
The Lady Magdalen Herbert.
The Lady Anne Marsham.
The Viscount Acheson.
The Lady Mabel Coke.
The Lady Mary Milbanke.
The Viscount Campden.
The Lady Norah Noel.
Captain the Viscount Brack-
ley.
The Lady Alice Egerton.
The Viscount En field.
The Viscountess Enfield.
The Lady Rachel Theodora
Byng.
Major Blunt.
The Lady Lilian Liddell.
The Lady Alexandra Acheson. The Lord Wodehouse.
The Lady Mary Acheson.
The Lady Theo Acheson.
The Lord Oxmantown.
The Lady Muriel Parsons.
The Lady Beatrice Agar.
The Lady Dorothy Walpole.
The Viscount Howick.
The Lady Sybil Grey.
The Lady Mary Parker.
The Viscount Boringdon.
The Viscount Melgund.
The Lady Eileen Elliot.
The Lady Juliet Lowther.
The Viscount Sandon.
The Lady Frances Ryder.
The Viscount Lascelles.
The Lady Isabel Wodehouse.
The Lady Mary Dawson.
The Viscountess Helmsley.
The Viscount Helmsley.
The Lady Cynthia Graham.
The Lady Ulrica Duncombe.
The Viscount Baring.
The Viscountess Baring.
The Viscount Errington.
The Viscount Dangan.
The Lady Bertha Wilbraham.
The Lady Lily Milles.
The Lady Mabel Palmer.
The Lord Worsley.
The Lady Rosaline Lucy
Northcote.
The Lady Margaret Lascelles. The Lady Florence Elizabeth
The Lord Greenock. Maude.
The Lady Marion Cathcart. The Lady Mildred Cooke.
The Lord Medway.
The Lady Medway
The Lady Alice Heathcote
The Viscount Grimston.
The Lady Helen Grimston.
The Lord Eliot.
Captain the Viscount Newport. Drummond Willoughby.
The Lady Florence Sibell The Lady Mary Heathcote
Bridgeman. Drummond Willoughby.
The Lady Agnes Lygon. The Lady Alexandra A. Wynn
The Lady Pleasance Elizabeth Carrington.
Rous. The Lady Celia Crewe-Milnes.
The Lady Gertrude Gore The Lady Evelyn Giffard.
Langton. The Lady Edwina Roberts.
The Viscount Newry and The Lady Aileen Mary
Morne. Roberts.
The Lady Cynthia Almina The Viscount Tumour.
Needham. The Lady Emma Crichton.
The Lady Aileen Wyndham
Quin. VISCOUNTS.
Captain the Viscount Ennis- The Honourable Robert
more. Devereux.
The Viscount Emlyn. The Honourable Mrs Dever-
The Viscountess Emlyn. eux.
The Lady Charlotte Graham- The Honourable Eleanor
Toler.
The Viscount Anson.
The Lady Mabel Anson.
The Lady Anne Lambton.
The Lord Moreton.
The Lady Moreton.
Mary Devereux.
The Master of Falkland.
The Honourable Catherine
Mary Gary.
The Honourable Margaret C.
Drummond.
APPENDIX I
The Honourable Maud Lyt-
telton.
The Honourable Evelyn Hugh
Boscawen.
The Honourable Edith Bos-
cawen.
TheHonourable Bridget Byng.
The Honourable Dorothy
Violet Hood.
The Honourable Ismay Lu-
cretia Preston.
The Honourable Edmund
Somerset Butler.
The Lord Grey of Groby.
The Honourable Mrs Somer-
set Butler.
The Honourable Kathleen
Annesley.
The Honourable Helen An-
nesley.
The Honourable Harry Lee
Dillon.
The Honourable Oriel J. C.
W. M. Skeffington. "
The Honourable Winifred H.
Skeffington.
Captain The Honourable John
Dawnay, D.S.O.
The Honourable Beryl Daw-
nay.
The Honourable Gwen Moles-
worth.
The Honourable Eleanora
Chetwynd.
Captain The Honourable
Gustavus William Hamil-
ton Russell.
The Honourable Maud Har-
riet Hamilton Russell.
Captain The Honourable
William R. Shute Bar-
rington.
The Honourable George Vere
Monckton-Arundell.
The Honourable Violet Fran-
ces Monckton.
The Honourable Mervyn
Richard Wingfield.
The Honourable Olive Eliza-
beth Wingfield.
Captain The Honourable
Maxwell Richard Crosby
Ward.
The Honourable Kathleen
Norah Ward.
The Honourable Thomas C.
R. Agar-Robartes.
The Honourable Mary Vere-
Agar-Robartes.
The Honourable Ethel St
Leger.
The Honourable Kathleen de
Montmorency.
TheHonourable John Vereker.
The Honourable Mabel
Vereker.
The Viscount Exmouth.
The Honourable Georgina
Pellew.
The Honourable Henry Frede-
rick Manners-Sutton.
The Honourable Mabel
Manners-Sutton.
The Honourable Evelyn Eliza-
beth Hill.
The Honourable Lavinia
Hardinge.
The Honourable Edward
Frederick Lindley Wood.
The Honourable Agnes Mary
Emily Wood.
The Honourable Mary Isabel
Portman.
The Honourable Dorothy
Brand.
The Honourable Francis
Garnet Wolseley.
The Honourable Mrs Cross.
The Honourable Richard
Assheton-Cross.
The Honourable Mary
Dorothea Cross.
The Honourable Sidney Hol-
land.
The Lady Mary Holland.
The Honourable Dorothy
Brett.
The Honourable Sylvia Brett.
The Honourable Beatrice
Goschen.
BARONS.
The Honourable Mrs Anthony
Dawson.
The Honourable Anthony
Dawson.
The Honourable Hilda Stour-
ton.
The Honourable Albert
Edward Astley.
The Lord de Clifford.
The Honourable Maud
Russell.
The Honourable Charles
Trefusis.
The Lady Jane Trefusis.
The Honourable Ada Harriet
Hepburn Stuart Forbes
Trefusis.
The Honourable Darea
Curzon.
The Lord Camoys.
The Honourable Richard
Greville Verney.
The Honourable Mrs Verney.
The Honourable Grace Mary
Eleanor Mostyn.
The Honourable Mrs Mostyn.
Captain The Honourable
William Frederick North.
The Honourable Mrs North.
The Honourable Henry Beau-
champ Oliver St John.
The Honourable Alice Ger-
trude St John.
The Honourable Geoffrey
C. Twistleton Wykeham
Fiennes.
The Honourable Mrs Twistle-
ton Wykeham Fiennes.
The Honourable Ethel Dormer.
The Honourable Christopher
J. H. Roper Curzon.
The Honourable Harriet
Roper Curzon.
The Honourable Margaret
Alice Byron.
The Honourable Henry Cecil
Vane.
The Honourable Thora Zelina
Gray.
The Honourable Ada Jane St
Clair.
The Honourable Mrs Forbes
Sempill.
The Master of Sempill.
The Honourable Katherine
Forbes Sempill.
The Honourable Gwendolen
Constable Maxwell.
The Honourable Angela Mary
Constable Maxwell.
The Honourable Bernard
Fitzalan Howard.
The Honourable Muriel Fitz-
alan Howard.
The Honourable Norah Strutt.
The Honourable Hilda Strutt.
The Honourable Averil E.
Vivian.
The Honourable Lilian F.
Elphinstone.
The Honourable Ethel Fraser.
The Honourable Gabriel
Berth wick.
The Master of Kinloss.
The Honourable Richard G.
Morgan-Grenville.
The Honourable Caroline
Mary Elizabeth Morgan-
Grenville.
The Master of Colville.
The Honourable Mrs Colville.
APPENDIX I
385
The Master of Napier.
The Honourable Mrs Napier.
The Honourable Clara Isabel
Murray.
The Master of Belhaven.
The Master of Rollo.
The Honourable Mrs Rollo.
The Honourable Constance
Rollo.
The Master of Ruthven.
The Honourable Mrs Ruthven.
The Honourable Mabel
Verney.
The Master of Saltoun.
The Honourable Louisa Eliza-
beth Kinnaird.
The Master of Polwarth.
The Honourable Mrs Scott.
The Honourable Lilias Hep-
burn Scott.
The Honourable Mary
Monson.
The Honourable Blanche
Curzon.
The Honourable Eleanor
Florence Curzon.
The Honourable Fanny
Vernon.
The Honourable Mrs Anson.
The Honourable Alice Hawke.
The Honourable Walter Fitz-
Uryan Rice.
The Lady Margaret Rice.
The Honourable Gladys Rice.
The Honourable Joan Mary
Conyers Norton.
Mrs Somers Cocks.
Miss Adeline Somers Cocks.
The Honourable Mary Noel
Hill.
The Honourable Julia Button.
The Honourable Mrs Har-
bord.
The Honourable Mrs Bulke-
ley Owen.
The Honourable Constance
Gough Calthorpe.
The Honourable Willoughby
Burrell.
The Honourable Mrs Wil-
loughby Burrell.
The Honourable William
George Orde Powlett.
The Honourable Mrs Orde
Powlett.
The Honourable Thomas
Lister.
The Honourable Barbara
Lister.
The Honourable Blanche A.
C. Butler.
The Honourable Clare
O'Brien.
The Lady Carbery.
The Lord Carbery.
The Honourable Zoe Maxwell.
The Honourable Dorothy
Wynn.
The Honourable Somerled G.
T. Macdonald.
The Honourable Hugh Somer-
set John Massy.
The Honourable Mrs Massy.
The Honourable Georgina
Caroline Dillon.
The Honourable Mary Caven-
dish.
The Honourable Constance
E. Shore.
The Honourable Ethel E. M.
Henniker-Major.
The Honourable Kathleen
Everilda Prittie.
The Honourable Granville
George Waldegrave.
The Honourable Mabel
Waldegrave.
The Honourable Charlotte
Trench.
The Honourable Sarah May
Trench.
The Honourable Mary
Massey.
The Honourable Cecilia
Blanche Thellusson.
The Honourable Montagu
Erskine.
The Honourable Mrs Erskine.
The Honourable John Neville
Manners.
The Honourable Mildred
Manners.
The Honourable Catherine
Horsley Beresford.
The Honourable Leopold
Ernest Canning.
The Honourable George
Weld-Forester.
The Honourable Mrs Weld-
Forester.
The Honourable Mary I. S.
L. Weld-Forester.
The Honourable Margaret E.
Holmes A'Court.
The Honourable James Bos-
well Talbot.
The Honourable Frances
Talbot.
The Honourable Coplestone
W. Bamfylde.
The Honourable Mrs Bam-
fylde.
The Honourable Edward
Lloyd Mostyn.
The Honourable Gwynedd
Lloyd Mostyn.
The Honourable Arthur
Henry Chichester.
The Honourable Mrs
Chichester.
The Honourable Hilda Caro-
line Chichester.
The Honourable James St
Vincent Saumarez.
The Honourable Evelyn
Saumarez.
The Honourable Mary Sidney.
The Honourable Lilian
Baring.
The Honourable Hyacinthe
Frances Littleton.
The Honourable John Beres-
ford Campbell.
The Honourable Mrs Camp-
bell.
The Honourable Mildred
Louisa Campbell.
The Honourable Agnes Rosa-
mond Bateman Hanbury.
The Honourable Evelyn
Henrietta Wrottesley.
The Honourable Rhona Mar-
garet A. Hanbury Tracy.
The Honourable Ethel Chris-
tian Methuen.
The Honourable Paul
Methuen.
The Honourable Maud
Stanley.
The Honourable Francis D.
Leigh.
The Honourable Mrs Leigh.
The Honourable Agnes
Leigh.
The Honourable Irene Con-
stance Lawley.
The Honourable Cecil Farrer.
The Honourable Thomas
Spring Rice.
The Honourable Mary Ellen
Spring Rice.
The Honourable Alethea Col-
borne.
The Honourable Alexandra
Vivian.
The Honourable Henry Par-
nell.
The Honourable Agnes Par-
nell.
The Honourable Hylda
Sugden.
The Honourable Fitzroy
Richard Somerset.
386
APPENDIX I
The Honourable Georgiana
Somerset.
The Honourable Sybil Roche.
The Honourable Robert
Victor Grosvenor.
The Honourable Albertine F.
Grosvenor.
The Honourable Lilah Con-
stance Cavendish.
The Honourable Frederick
John Thesiger.
The Honourable Mrs
Thesiger.
The Honourable Barbara
Lois Yarde Buller.
The Honourable Margaret
Wyndham.
The Honourable Henry
Brougham.
The Honourable Eleanor
Mabel Brougham.
The Honourable Richard
Bethell.
The Honourable Luke White.
The Honourable Mary Somer-
ville.
The Honourable Edward
Sholto Douglas Pennant.
The Honourable Mrs Douglas
Pennant.
The Honourable Alice
Douglas Pennant.
The Honourable Sophia
Trollope.
The Honourable Arthur H.
J. Walsh.
The Lady Clementine Walsh.
The Honourable Emily
Gertrude Walsh.
The Honourable Arthur
Edward O'Neill.
The Lady Annabel O'Neill.
The Honourable Henrietta
O'Neill.
The Honourable A. E.
Napier.
The Honourable Eva Lilian
Napier.
The Honourable Alexander
Graham Lawrence.
The Honourable Anna
Lawrence.
The Honourable Richard
Acton.
The Honourable Veronique
Greville.
The Lord O'Hagan.
The Honourable Mary
O'Hagan.
The Honourable Henry Lynd-
hurst Bruce.
The Honourable Margaret
Cecilia Bruce.
The Honourable Mary Louisa
Fremantle.
The Honourable Mary
Hammond.
The Honourable Herbert
Pakington.
The Honourable MaryAugusta
Pakington.
The Honourable Ethel Gerard.
The Honourable Anna Maria
Adderley.
The Honourable Florence
Annette Georgina Palk.
The Honourable Leila Hill
Trevor.
The Honourable Wyndham
Knatchbull-Hugessen.
The Honourable Margaret
Knatchbull-Hugessen.
The Honourable Constance
Russell.
The Honourable Victor
Russell.
The Honourable Francis Van
den Bemp de Johnstone.
The Honourable Edith Van
den Bemp de Johnstone.
The Lady Irene Tufton.
The Honourable Frederick
Gerard.
The Honourable Dudley
Marjoribanks, D.S.O.
The Honourable Mrs Marjori-
banks.
The Honourable Ethel Mili-
cent Dodson.
The Honourable Walter
James.
The Honourable Mrs James.
The Honourable Robert Alfred
Collier.
The Honourable William
Gibson.
The Honourable Mrs Gibson.
The Honourable Edward
Gibson.
The Honourable Violet
Gibson.
The Honourable Mary de
Yarburgh Bateson.
The Honourable Violet
Mills.
The Honourable Mrs Baillie.
Mr J. Bruce Baillie.
The Honourable Adele
Hamilton.
The Honourable Thomas
Allnutt Brassey.
The Lady Idina Brassey.
The Honourable Katherine
Annie Thring.
The Honourable Edward
Charles Macnaghten.
The Honourable Mrs Mac-
naghten.
The' Honourable Helen Mac-
naghten.
The Honourable John Towns-
hen d St Aubyn.
The Lady Edith St Aubyn.
The Honourable Mabel St
Aubyn.
The Honourable John Limbrey
Sclater Booth.
The Honourable Coulson C.
Fellowes.
The Honourable Alexandra
Frances Anne Fellowes.
The Honourable Frances
Eaton.
The Honourable John Gelli-
brand Hubbard.
The Honourable Winifred
Mary Hubbard.
Miss Minnie Savile Lumley.
The Honourable Kathleen
Morris.
The Honourable Rupert
Edward Guinness.
The Honourable FannyHood.
The Honourable James
Hannen.
The Honourable Mrs Hannen.
The Honourable Margaret
Hannen.
Miss Helen D. Campbell of
Blythswood.
The Honourable William
Brooks.
The Honourable Mrs Brooks.
The Lady William Cecil.
The Honourable Sybil
Edwardes.
The Honourable Sybil Mar-
garet Tyssen Amherst.
The Honourable Sybil Legh.
The Honourable Andrew
Mulholland.
The Honourable Eva Norah
Mulholland.
The Honourable John Maclean
Rolls.
The Honourable Lyon G. H.
L. Playfair.
The Honourable Lucy Play-
fair.
The Honourable Arthur
Foljambe, M.V.O.
The Honourable Mrs Fol-
jambe.
APPENDIX I
387
The Honourable Edith Mar-
garet Foljambe.
The Honourable George
Arthur Hamilton Gordon.
The Honourable Rachel
Nevile Hamilton Gordon.
The Honourable Clarice
Margaret Rendel.
The Honourable Horace Scott
Davey.
The Honourable Mrs Davey.
The Honourable Mildred
Davey.
The Honourable Evelyn Loch.
The Honourable Juliet Mary
E. Stanhope Gardner.
Miss James.
The Honourable Oliver
Borthwick.
Miss Harriet Borthwick.
The Honourable Edith
Caroline Gibbs.
The Honourable Gertrude
Mary Heneage.
The Lord Holmpatrick.
The Honourable Margaret
Hamilton.
The HonourableAgnes Burns.
The Honourable Mrs Robert
Howard.
Mr Robert Howard.
The Honourable Catherine
Hozier.
The Honourable R. Bailey,
D.S.O.
The Honourable Mrs Bailey.
The Honourable Elizabeth
Mabel Bailey.
The Honourable Dudley
Carleton.
Major-General Leir Carleton.
The Honourable Daisy Carle-
ton.
The Honourable Robert B. F.
Robertson.
The Honourable Philadelphia
Sybil Robertson.
The Honourable Lilian
Russell.
The Honourable Mrs Lindley.
The Honourable Jessie
Lindley.
The Honourable Georgina
O'Brien.
The Honourable Arthur
Webster.
The Honourable Mrs Webster.
The Honourable Nina Kay-
Shuttleworth.
The Honourable Mrs Harrison
Tinsley.
The Honourable Dorothy
Elizabeth Smith-Barry.
The Honourable Clement
Mitford.
The Honourable Frances
Mitford.
No. 9. — REPRESENTATIVES OF INDIA.
Colonel Hfs Highness Maharaja Dhiraj Sir Madho Rao Sindhia, G. C.S.I., A.D.C., Maharaja
of Gwalior.
His Highness Maharaja Dhiraj Sawai Sir Madho Singh, G. C.S.I., G.C.I.E., Maharaja of
Jaipur.
His Highness Sir Shahu Chhatrapati Maharaj, G.C.S.I., Maharaja of Kolhapur.
Major His Highness Maharaja Sir Ganga Singh, K.C.I.E., Maharaja of Bikaner.
Colonel His Highness Maharaja Sir Pertab Singh, G.C.S.I., K.C.B., A.D.C., Maharaja of
Idar.
His Highness Sir Sultan Muhammad Shah, Aga Khan, G.C.I.E.
Lt.-Colonei His Highness Maharaja Sir Narayan Bhup Bahadur, G.C.S.I., C.B., A.D.C.,
Maharaja of Cooch Behar.
Her Highness Maharanee of Cooch Behar.
His Highness Prince Victor Duleep Singh.
Her Highness Princess Victor Duleep Singh.
His Highness Prince Frederick Duleep Singh.
Her Highness Princess Catherine Duleep
Singh.
Her Highness Princess Bamba Duleep Singh.
Her Highness Princess Sophia Duleep Singh.
Maharaj Kumar Prodyot Kumar Tagore.
Sir Jamsetjee Jeejeebhai, Bart., J.P.
Lady Jamsetjee Jeejeebhai.
Raja Sir Savalai Ramaswami Mudaliyar,
Kt.,C.I.E.
Maharaja Sri Rao The Honourable Sir
Venkatasvetachalapati Ranga Rao
Bahadur, K.C.I.E., Raja of Bpbbili.
Meherban Ganpatrao Madhavrav Vinchurkar.
The Honourable Asif Kadr Saiyid Wasif Ali
Mirza of Murshidabad.
The Honourable Nawab Mumtaz-ud-daula
Muhamad Faiyaz Ali Khan of Pahasu,
Bulandshahr District.
Nawab Fateh Ali Khan, Kizilbash.
Gangadhar Madho Chitnavis, C.I.E., Presi-
dent, Nagpur Municipality.
Rai Jagannath Barua Bahadur.
Maung On Gaing, C.I.E., A.T.M.
Raja Pertab Singh of Pertabgarh Oudh.
Lieutenant-Colonel Nawab Mahomed Aslam
Khan, C.I.E., Khan Bahadur of
Peshawar.
Kunwar Sir Harnam Singh, K.C.I. E., of
Kapurthala.
Lady Harnam Singh.
Baba Sir Khem Singh, Bedi of Kullar,
K.C.I.E.
MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INDIA.
Sir Dennis Fitzpatrick, K.C.S.I.
Sir James Braithwaite Peile, K.C.S.I.
Sir Stuart C. Bayley, K.C.S.I., C.I.E.
Lady Bayley.
General Sir J. J. H. Gordon, K.C.B.
The Honourable Lady Gordon.
Sir James L. Mackay, K.C.I.E.
388
APPENDIX I
Sir John Edge, Kt., K.C.
Lady Edge.
Sir Philip P. Hutchins, K.C. S.I.
Lieutenant-General Sir A. R. Badcock,
K.C. B., C.S.I.
Sir Charles Turner, K.C. I.E.
Lady Turner.
EX-GOVERNORS OF PROVINCES IN INDIA.
Sir William Mackworth-Young, K.C. S.I.
Lady Mackworth-Young.
Mr Lionel R. Ashburner, C.S.I.
Mrs Ashburner.
Sir Charles Elliott, K.C. S.I.
Lady Elliott.
Sir Charles Lyall, K.C.S.I., C.I.E.
Lady Lyall.
Sir Auckland Colvin, K.C.M.G., K.C.S.I..
C.I.E.
REPRESENTATIVES OF INDIAN SERVICES
(ACTIVE LIST).
MrW. R. Lawrence, C.I.E.
Mrs Lawrence.
Colonel R. Wace, C.B.
Major-GeneralSirE. Stedman, K.C.I.E..C.B.
The Venerable Archdeacon A. E. Stone.
The Reverend John Taylor.
Colonel St G. G. Gore, C.B.
Mr H. C. Hill.
General Sir G. C. Bird, K.C.I.E.. C.B.
Mr J. McC. Douie.
Mr C. J. Lalkika.
Sir F. J. Goldsmid, K.C.S.I., C.B.
SirE. F. G. Law, K.C.M.G.
Lady Law.
Lieutenant-Colonel A. P. Thornton, C.S.I.
Sir F. W. Maclean, Kt., K.C., K.C.I.E.,
Chief Justice, Bengal.
Lady Maclean.
Mr Justice E. T. Candy.
Sir C. A. White, Chief Justice, Madras.
Sir H. J. S. Cotton, K.C.S.I.
Mr D. M. Smeaton, C.S.I.
Mr W. O. Clark, Chief Judge, Punjab.
Mr F S Copleston, Chief Judge, Burma.
Mr H. F. Evans, C.S.I.
Mr Ross Scott.
Sir Charles Ollivant, K.C.I.E.
Mr M. C. W. Hodson.
Mr A. W. B. Higgens.
Mr F. A. T. Phillips.
Sir Alexander F. D. Cunningham, K.C.I.E.
Captain W. S. Goodridge, C.I.E., R.N.
Mr Leslie Probyn.
Mr T. H. Thornton, C.S.I., D.C.L.
INDIAN RESIDENTS IN LONDON.
Sahibzada Nasir Ali Khan of Ram pur.
Khan Zaman Khan of Jaora,
Dr S. A. Kapadia,
REPRESENTATIVES OF INDIAN SERVICES
(RETIRED).
Sir Lepel Griffin, K.C.S.I.
Sir James Richey, K.C.I.E., C.S.I.
Mr Alan Cadell, C.S.I.
Sir George Birdwood, K.C.I.E., C.S.I.
Sir Charles Pritchard, K.C.I.E.
Sir Arthur Trevor, K.C.S.I.
Surgeon-Major-General Sir Joseph Fayrer,
Bart., K.C.S.I.
Lady Fayrer.
Surgeon-General J. Cleghorn.
General Sir Thomas Gordon, K.C.B.,
K.C.I.E., C.S.I.
Colonel Sir William Bisset, K.C.I.E.
General Sir John Watson, B.C., G.C.B.
General Sir Harry Prendergast, B.C., G.C.B.
Sir Alexander Mackenzie, K.C.S.I.
Sir Henry Cunningham, K.C.I.E.
Lieutenant C. R. Low, Ret. I.N.
Surgeon-General W. R. Hooper, C.S.I.
Colonel Sir T. H. Holdich, K.C.I.E., C.B.
Mr Gerald Ritchie.
Colonel J. W. Ottley, C.I.E.
Sir C. A. Lawson, Kt.
General James Michael, C.S.I.
Mr H. H. Shephard.
Mrs Shephard.
Sir Raymond West, K.C.I.E.
Sir H. W. Bliss, K.C.I.E.
SirT. C. Hope, K.C.S.I., C.I.E.
SirC. C. Stevens, K.C.S.I.
General Sir S. de B. Edwardes, K.C.B.
Sir Charles Grant, K.C.S.I.
Sir Evan James, K.C.I.E., C.S.I.
Sir A. J. L. Cappel, K.C.I.E.
Mr Justice Rampini.
POLITICAL OFFICERS, MEMBERS OF INDIAN
CHIEFS' SUITES, AND NATIVE OFFICERS
ON DUTY.
Colonel Sir S. S. Jacob, K.C.I.E.
Major H. V. Cox.
Lieutenant-Colonel J. H. Newill.
Major A. F. Pinhey, C.I.E.
Mr C. H. A. Hill.
Mr John Pollen LL.D.
Sirdar Bahadur, Kashi Rao Survey, C.S.I.,
Com. -in-Chief of Gwalior Army.
Raja Udai Singh of Jaipur.
Meherban Pirajirao Ghatge Sarjerao Vizarat
Ma-ab, the Chief of Kagal of Kolhapur.
Kunwar Pirthi Raj Singh, Cousin of His
Highness the Maharaja of Bikaner.
Maharaj Kunwar Doulat Singh of Idar, Aide-
de-Camp to His Royal Highness The
Prince of Wales for the Coronation.
Sir William Lee- Warner, K.C.S.I.
APPENDIX I 389
Lady Lee-Warner. Major Mahomed Ali-Bey, Nawab Afsur-ud-
Lieutenant-Colonel W. H. Curzon Wyllie Dowla Bahadur.
(Political Aide-de-Camp to the Secretary Captain Raj Kumar Bir Bikram Singh of
of State for India). Sirmur.
Mrs Wyllie. Thakur Raghanath Singh.
No. 10. — REPRESENTATIVES OF BRITISH COLONIES.
General Lord Grenfell, G.C.B., G.C.M.G. (Mediterranean, comprising Gibraltar, Malta, and
Cyprus).
Mrs St Aubyn.
The Right Honourable Sir Joseph West Ridgeway, G.C.M.G., K.C.B., K.C.S.I. (Eastern
Colonies and Protectorates, Fiji, and Western Pacific).
Miss Ridgeway.
Sir Walter Joseph Sendall, G.C.M.G. (West Indies, Bermuda, British Honduras and the
Falkland Islands).
Lady Sendall.
Sir William MacGregor, M.D., K.C.M.G., C.B. (West African Colonies and Protectorates
and St Helena).
Lady MacGregor.
The Right Honourable Sir Wilfrid Laurier, G.C.M.G. (Canada).
Lady Laurier.
The Right Honourable Sir Edmund Barton, K.C., G.C.M.G. (Commonweath of Australia).
Lady Barton.
The Right Honourable Richard John Seddon (New Zealand).
Mrs Seddon.
The Right Honourable Sir John Gordon Sprigg, G.C.M.G. (Cape of Good Hope).
Miss Sprigg.
Lieutenant-Colonel The Right Honourable Sir Albert Henry Hime, K.C.M.G., R.E. (Natal).
Miss Hime.
The Honourable Sir Robert Bond, K.C.M.G. (Newfoundland).
His Highness The Sultan of Perak, G.C.M.G.
Mr H. C. Clifford, C.M.G., in attendance.
Lewanika, Paramount Chief of the Barotse Kingdom.
Colonel Colin Harding, C.M.G., in attendance.
COLONIAL BISHOPS.
The Most Reverend Robert Machray, Archbishop of Rupertsland and Primate of all Canada.
The Right Reverend William Thomas Tnornhill Webber, Bishop of Brisbane.
The Right Reverend William Day Reeve, Bishop of Mackenzie River.
Mrs Reeve.
The Right Reverend George Albert Ormsby, Bishop of Honduras.
Mrs Ormsby.
The Right Reverend Herbert Tugwell, Bishop of Western Equatorial Africa.
Mrs Tugwell.
The Right Reverend Cecil Wilson, Bishop of Melanesia.
Mrs Wilson.
The Right Reverend Herbert Mather, Bishop of Antigua.
The Right Reverend Montagu John Stone-Wigg, Bishop of New Guinea.
The Right Reverend Joseph Charles Hoare, Bishop of Victoria, Hong-Kong.
Mrs Hoare.
The Right Reverend Hollingworth Tully Kingdon, Bishop of Fredricton, New Brunswick.
The Right Reverend C. O. L. Riley, Bishop of Perth.
OTHER PERSONS CONNECTED WITH THE BRITISH COLONIES, SELF-
GOVERNING COLONIES AND STATES.
( - A v A n A Lady Borden.
The Honourable Sir W. Mulock, K.C.M.G.
The Honourable SirF. W. Borden, K.C.M.G. , (Postmaster-General).
M.P., M.D. (Minister of Militia and The Honourable W. S. Fielding (Minister of
Defence). Finance).
390
APPENDIX I
Miss Fielding.
Miss Florence Fielding.
The Honourable W. Paterson (Minister of
Customs).
Mrs Paterson.
Miss Paterson.
The Honourable H. G. Carroll (Solicitor-
General).
Mrs Carroll.
The Honourable W. H. Montague.
Mrs Montague.
The Honourable G. A. Drummond (Senator).
Mrs Drummond.
The Honourable Robert McKay (Senator).
Mrs McKay.
The Honourable P. McSweeny (Senator).
Mrs McSweeny.
The Honourable W. Gibson (Senator).
Miss Gibson.
The Honourable G. A. Cox (Senator).
Mrs Cox.
Mrs Lyman Jones (Wife of Senator).
Miss Lyman Jones.
The Honourable Mr Justice Girouard
(Supreme Court of Canada).
Mr A. F. McLaren, M.P.
Mrs McLaren.
Mr A. W. Puttee, M.P.
Mrs Puttee.
Mr Ralph Smith, M.P.
Mrs Smith.
Mr W. S. Calvert, M.P.
Mr J. H. Logan, M.P.
Mr D. C, ~
C. Fraser.
Mr Alex. Johnston, M.P.
Mr A. E. Kemp, M.P.
MrF. C. Bruce, M.P.
Mr Samuel Barker, M.P.
Mrs W. C. Edwards (Wife of M.P.).
The Honourable G. W. Ross (Premier of
Ontario).
The Honourable H. T. Duffy (Member of
Provincial Government, Quebec).
The Honourable G. H. Murray (Premier of
Nova Scotia).
Mrs Murray.
The Honourable H. L. Tweedie (Member of
Provincial Government, New Brunswick).
Mrs Tweedie.
The Hon. A. P. Roblin (Premier of Mani-
toba).
The Honourable James Dunsmuir (Premier
of British Columbia).
Mrs Dunsmuir.
The Honourable A. L. Peters (Premier of
Prince Edward Island).
Mrs Peters.
The Honourable F. W. Haultain (Premier of
North-West Territories).
The Honourable Colin Campbell (Attorney-
General, Manitoba).
Mrs Colin Campbell.
Mr T. Berthiaume (M.L.C., Quebec).
Principal W. Peterson, LL.D., C.M.G.
(McGill University).
Mrs Peterson.
Colonel Otter, C.B. (Commandant ist
Canadian Contingent, South Africa).
Colonel D. A. Macdonald.
Mrs Macdonald.
Mr E. S. Clouston (Bank of Montreal).
Mr Hugh Graham (" Montreal Star ").
Mrs Graham.
Mr John Ross Robertson ("Toronto Tele-
gram").
Mrs Robertson.
Lieutenant-Colonel Cooke (Commanding
Prince of Wales' Regiment, Montreal).
Mrs Cooke.
Lieutenant-Colonel Grasett (Chief Constable,
Toronto).
Lieutenant-Colonel G. T. Denison (Com-
manding Governor General's Body-
guard).
Mr E. L. Newcombe, K.C. (Deputy Minister
of Justice).
JudgeC. O. Ermatinger (County Court Judge).
Judge James Robb ,, ,,
Judge W. W. Wells ,, ,,
Judge Macdonald ,, ,,
Colonel The Honourable J. M. Gibson
(Member of the Provincial Government,
Ontario).
Mrs Gibson.
Mr Justice Hall (Montreal).
Mrs Hall.
Mr Justice Irving (Supreme Court, British
Columbia).
Dr F. G. Roddick, M.P. (Dean of the
Faculty of Medicine, McGill University).
MrJ. C. Madore, M.P.
Sir James Grant, K.C.M.G., M.D.
Lady Grant.
Lieutenant-Colonel J. H. Burland (Com-
manding Canadian Rifle Team,
Bisley).
Mrs Burland.
Judge Carman.
Mrs Carman.
Mr G. R. Cockburn (formerly M.P.).
Mrs Cockburn.
Mrs Sanford (Widow of Senator Sanford).
The Very Reverend The Dean of Quebec.
Mrs Williams.
The Honourable D. M. Eberts, K.C.
(Attorney-General of British Columbia).
Lieutenant - Colonel John Carson (Com-
manding 5th Regiment Royal Scots of
Canada).
Lady Edgar (Widow of the Speaker of the
House of Commons of Canada).
Miss Edgar.
APPENDIX I
Mr G. R. Parkin, LL.D., C.M.G. (Principal
of Upper Canada College).
Mr J. D. Rolland (M.L.C., Province of
Quebec).
CAPE OF GOOD HOPE.
The Honourable Alexander Wilmot, M.L.C.
Mrs Wilmot.
Mr Henry Bailie Christian (formerly M.L.C. ).
Mr William Runciman, M.H.A.
Colonel D. Harris, C.M.G. , M.H.A.
Mrs Harris.
Mr David Christian De Waal, M.H.A.
Mr James Tennant Molteno, M.H.A.
Mrs Molteno.
Mr Francis Robert Thompson, M.H.A.
Mrs Thompson.
Mr G. C. Oliver, M.H.A.
The Honourable James Douglas Logan,
M.L.C.
Mrs Logan.
Mr Amos Bailey, M.H.A.
Mr J. J. A. Graaff, M.H.A.
NATAL.
Mr James Liege Hulett (Speaker of the
Legislative Assembly).
Lady Hulett.
Sir David Hunter, K. C.M.G.
Lady Hunter.
Mr Frank Umhlali Reynolds, M.L.A.
Mrs Reynolds.
Mr Joseph Baynes, C.M.G., M.L.A.
Mrs Baynes.
Mr Robert Russell, Superintendent of Educa-
tion.
Mrs Russell.
Lady Binns.
Mr John George Maydon, M.L.A.
Mrs Maydon.
Mr John Nicol, C.M.G.
NEWFOUNDLAND.
The Right Honourable Sir W. V. Whiteway,
K. C.M.G.
Lady Whiteway.
NEW SOUTH WALES.
Sir Frederick Matthew Darley, G. C.M.G.
(Lieutenant-Governor).
Lady Darley.
The Honourable Sir Julian Salomons, K.C.
Sir James Fairfax.
Lady Fairfax.
The Honourable C. J. Roberts, C.M.G.,
M.L.C.
Mrs Roberts.
Mrs R. E. O'Connor (Wife of the Vice-Presi-
dent of the Commonwealth Executive
Council).
Mr Eden George, M.L.A.
Sir James Graham, M.D. (ex-Mayor of Syd-
ney).
Mr G. H. Knibbs (Education Commissioner).
Mr J. W. Turner (Education Commissioner).
Mr G. A. Cruickshank (Member of the Com-
monwealth House of Representatives).
Mrs Cruickshank.
Miss MacArthur Onslow.
Miss Eadith C. Walker.
Miss Mabel Gould.
Mr Austin Chapman (Member of the Com-
monwealth House of Representatives).
Mrs Florence Williams.
The Honourable J. T. Walker (Senator of the
Commonwealth).
Major - General George Arthur French,
C.M.G., R.A.
Mrs French.
Mr William Nicholas Willis, M.L.A.
Mr E. A. Barton.
Miss Barton.
Mr John Longstaff.
Mrs J. Russell French.
The Venerable Archdeacon Archibald Francis
D. Bode.
NEW ZEALAND.
The Honourable Alfred Jerome Cadman,
C.M.G.
Miss Seddon.
Miss Mary Seddon.
Mr Dyer.
Mrs Dyer.
Dr T. M. Hocken.
Mrs Hocken.
Mr Seymour Thome George.
Mrs George.
The Reverend Harold Anson, M.A.
Mrs Cecil Lascelles.
The Honourable Richard Oliver.
Mrs Oliver.
Mrs Robert Heaton Rhodes.
Major F. Nelson George.
Mrs George.
Dr John George Findlay, LL.D.
Mrs Findlay.
Mrs T. C. Williams.
Lady Douglas.
QUEENSLAND.
Mr Adam Forsyth.
The Honourable John Douglas, C.M.G.
Senator the Honourable John Ferguson.
Mrs Ferguson.
Mr William Beit.
Mrs Beit.
Mr Gerard Gore.
Mrs Gore.
Mr William H. Couldery.
Mrs Couldery.
The Reverend Canon Warner.
392
APPENDIX I
Mr J. Ewen Davidson.
Mrs Davidson.
Lady M'llwraith.
Mr Andrew Fisher.
SOUTH AUSTRALIA.
Sir Edwin T. Smith, K.C.M.G.
Lady Smith.
Mr Arthur Wellington Ware, C.M.G.
Mrs Ware.
Mr A. G. Pendleton.
Mrs Pendleton.
Mr Frank Johnson.
TASMANIA.
Mr Robert C. Patterson, M.H.A.
Mrs Patterson.
Mrs Henry Dobson.
Lieutenant - Colonel Cyril Cameron, C.B.,
Commanding the Commonwealth Coron-
ation Contingent.
Mrs Cyril Cameron.
Mr P. Oakley Fysh.
Mrs Oakley Fysh.
Mrs Robert Walker.
Mr Leslie Walker.
Mr Donald Cameron.
Mrs Stourton.
Lieutenant-Colonel J. G. Davies, C.M.G.
Mrs Davies.
VICTORIA.
Lady Gillott.
Mrs Edward Miller.
Colonel W. T. Reay.
Mr Langlands Jack.
Mrs Langlands Jack.
Mr J. Payne.
Mrs Payne.
Mr David Elder.
Mrs Elder.
Lady Baillie.
Mrs Ryan.
The Honourable F. S. Grimwade.
Mrs Grimwade.
Mrs S. MacCulloch.
Mr Justice J. H. Hood.
Mrs Hood.
Janet Lady Clarke.
Lady Clarke.
Judge J. J. Casey, C.M.G.
The Honourable William MacCulloch (ex-
Minister of Defence).
Miss MacCulloch.
Mr William Knox.
Mrs Knox.
Mr John Cooke.
Miss Hodges (Daughter of Mr Justice
Hodges).
WESTERN AUSTRALIA.
The Right Honourable Sir John Forrest,
G. C.M.G.
Lady Forrest.
The Honourable H. W. Venn.
Mrs Venn.
The Honourable J. W. Hackett, M.L.C.
The Reverend Dean F. Goldsmith.
Mrs Goldsmith.
The Reverend G. E. Rowe.
Mrs Rowe.
Major J. T. Hobbs.
Mrs Hobbs.
Lady Wittenoom.
Mr F. F. B. Wittenoom.
Miss Lefroy.
Major J. W. Hope.
Mrs Hope.
CROWN COLONIES, ETC.
CEYLON.
Mr Charles Peter Layard, Chief Justice.
Mrs Layard.
Mr Hardinge Hay Cameron, Treasurer.
Mrs Cameron .
Mr Francis Robert Ellis, C.M.G., Auditor-
General.
Mrs Ellis.
HONG-KONG.
Sir Henry Arthur Blake, G. C.M.G., Governor
and Commander-in-Chief.
Lady Blake.
Sir Catchick Paul Chater, C.M.G., Member
of the Executive and Legislative Councils.
Sir Thomas Jackson, Bart., Manager of the
Hong-Kong and Shanghai Bank.
Lady Jackson.
Mr J. H. Whitehead, M.L.C.
TRINIDAD.
Sir Cornelius Alfred Maloney, K.C.M.G.,
Governor and Commander-in-Chief.
Lady Maloney.
Mr G. Townsend Fenwick, M.L.C.
Mrs Fenwick.
JAMAICA AND TURKS ISLANDS.
Sir A. W. L. Hemming, G. C.M.G., Captain-
General and Governor-in-Chief.
Lady Hemming.
Mr Ernest Augustus Northcote, Puisne
Judge, Jamaica.
Mrs Northcote.
Mr Geoffrey Peter St Aubyn, Judge of the
Supreme Court of the Turks Islands.
Mrs St Aubyn.
APPENDIX I
393
MALTA.
Sir Giuseppe Carbone, LL.D., G.C.M.G.,
Chief Justice.
The Baroness of Diar el Binet and Bucana,
Representative of the Nobility of Malta.
The Marquis Cassar de Sain, do.
The Marchioness Cassar de Sain, do.
Count Sant Fournier, do.
Countess Sant Fournier, do.
GOLD COAST.
Mr William Clark, Attorney-General.
Mrs Clark.
STRAITS SETTLEMENTS.
Mr Charles Walter Sneyd Kynnersley,
C.M.G., Resident Councillor, Penang.
Mrs Kynnersley.
Mr E. C. H. Hill, Auditor-General.
BRITISH GUIANA.
Mr Nicholas Darnell Davis, C.M.G., Auditor-
General.
Mrs Davis.
SOUTHERN RHODESIA.
Mr W. H. Milton, C.M.G., Senior Ad-
ministrator.
Mrs Milton.
SOUTHERN NIGERIA.
Mr Henry Greene Kelly, Chief Justice.
Mr Leslie Probyn, Secretary.
Mrs Probyn.
Mr John Winkfield, Attorney-General.
NORTHERN NIGERIA.
Mr William Wallace, C.M.G., Deputy High
Commissioner.
Mrs Wallace.
LAGOS.
Sir Thomas Crossley Rayner, Chief Justice.
Lady Rayner.
Mr Charles Herbert Harley Moseley, Colonial
Secretary.
Mrs Moseley.
SIERRA LEONE.
Sir Charles Anthony King - Harman,
K.C.M.G., Governor and Commander-in-
Chief.
Lady King-Harman.
Mr Philip Crampton Smyly, Chief Justice.
LEEWARD ISLANDS.
Sir Gerald Strickland, LL.B., K.C.M.G.,
Count della Catena, Governor and Com-
mander-in-Chief.
The Lady Edeline Strickland.
Mr Charles Thomas Cox, Administrator of
Saint Christopher-Nevis.
Mrs Cox.
Fiji.
Sir Henry Moore Jackson, K.C.M.G.,
Governor and Commander-in-Chief.
Lady Jackson.
BAHAMAS.
Sir Ormond Drimmie Malcolm, Chief Justice.
Lady Malcolm.
Miss Carter (Daughter of Sir G. T. Carter,
K.C.M.G., the Governor).
BRITISH HONDURAS.
Mr Walter Llewelyn Lewis, Chief Justice.
Mrs Lewis.
GAMBIA.
Sir George Chardin Denton, K.C.M.G.,
Governor and Commander-in-Chief.
ST VINCENT.
Mr D. A. Macdonald, Member of the Execu-
tive and Legislative Councils.
FALKLAND ISLANDS.
Mr William Grey-Wilson, C.M.G., Governor
and Commander-in-Chief.
Mrs Grey- Wilson.
BRITISH NEW GUINEA.
Mr George Ruthven Le Hunte, C.M.G.,
Lieutenant-Governor.
AGENTS-GENERAL FOR THE COLONIES.
The Right Honourable Lord Strathcona and
Mount Royal, G.C.M.G., High Com-
missioner for the Dominion of Canada.
The Lady Strathcona and Mount Royal.
The Honourable Henry Copeland, Agent-
General for New South Wales.
Miss Copeland.
The Honourable William Pember Reeves,
Agent-General for New Zealand.
Mrs Reeves.
The Honourable Sir Horace Tozer, K. C. M. G. ,
Agent-General for Queensland.
Lady Tozer.
Mr Thomas Ekins Fuller, Agent-General for
the Cape of Good Hope.
Mrs Fuller.
Mr Henry Allerdale Grainger, Agent-General
for South Australia.
Honourable Henry Bruce Lefroy, Agent-
General for Western Australia.
Honourable Alfred Dobson, Agent-General
for Tasmania.
Lady Dobson.
Sir Walter Peace, K.C.M.G., Agent-General
for Natal.
Lady Peace.
394 APPENDIX I
THE COLONIES (continued).
Major Maurice Alexander Cameron, R.E., C.M.G., Crown Agent for the Colonies.
Mrs Cameron.
Mr William Hepworth Mercer, Crown Agent for the Colonies.
Sir Edward Wingfield, K.C.B., late Under-Secretary of State for the Colonies.
Lady Wingfield.
Sir John Terence Nicolls O'Brien, K.C.M.G., late Colonial Governor.
Lady O'Brien.
Sir James Shaw Hay, K.C.M.G., late Colonial Governor.
Lady Hay.
Sir Francis Fleming, K.C.M.G., late Colonial Governor.
Lady Fleming.
Sir Hubert Henry Edward Jerningham, K.C.M.G., late Colonial Governor.
Lady Jerningham.
Sir George Thomas Michael O'Brien, K.C.M.G., late Colonial Governor.
Colonel Sir Frederic Cardew, K.C.M.G., late Colonial Governor.
Lady Cardew.
Sir Edward Noel Walker, K.C.M.G., late Lieutenant-Governor of Ceylon.
Lady Walker.
Sir John Worrell Carrington, C.M.G., late Chief Justice of Hong Kong.
Lady Carrington.
Mr George Vandeleur Fiddes, C.B., Secretary to the Transvaal Administration.
Mrs Fiddes.
Mr Henry Francis Wilson, C.M.G., Secretary to the Administration, Orange River Colony.
Dr Bernard Otto Kellner, Mayor of Bloemfontein.
Mrs Kellner.
Sir Arthur N. Birch, K.C.M.G., formerly Lieutenant-Governor of Ceylon.
Miss Birch.
Lady Haynes Smith.
Colonel McKean.
No. ii. — BRITISH MINISTERS AT FOREIGN COURTS.
(N.B. — British -Ambassadors are placed a mono Privy Councillors.}
Sir Edwin H. Egerton, K.C.B. Sir John C. Kennedy, K.C.M.G.
Lady Egerton. Lady Kennedy.
Sir Edmund Constantine Henry Phipps, Sir George F. Bonham, Bart.
G.C.M.G., C.B. Lady Bonham.
Sir Henry Bering, Bart, K.C.M.G. Sir Arthur H. Hardinge, K.C.M.G., C.B.
Lady Bering. Lady Hardinge.
The Honourable Sir W. Barrington,
K.C.M.G. Mr G. E. Welby.
Sir Henry Howard, K.C.M.G., C.B. The Honourable Alan Johnstone, C.V.O.
Lady Howard. The Honourable Mrs Alan Johnstone.
No. 12. — KNIGHTS GRAND CROSS OF THE VARIOUS ORDERS.
G.C.B. Lady Clarke.
General Sir Archibald Alison, Bart. , G. C. B. General Sir John Forbes, G. C. B.
Lady Alison. Lady Forbes.
General Sir Michael A. S. Biddulph, G.C.B. Admiral The Honourable Sir Edmund
Lady Biddulph. Fremantle, G. C. B. , C. M. G.
General Sir Robert Biddulph, G.C.B., The Honourable Lady Fremantle.
G.C.M.G. General Sir Charles Gough, B.C., G.C.B.
Lieutenant-General Sir Henry Brackenbury, Lady Gough.
G.C.B., K.C.S.I. General Sir Hugh Gough. B.C., G.C.B.
Lady Brackenbury. Lady Gough.
General Sir Charles H. Brownlow, G.C.B., General Sir George Greaves, G.C.B.,
K.C.S.I. K.C.M.G.
Lady Brownlow. Admiral Sir W. Hunt Grubbe, G.C.B.
Lieutenant-General Sir C. Mansfield Clarke, Admiral of the Fleet The Lord John Hay,
Bart., G.C.B. G.C.B.
APPENDIX I
395
The Lady John Hay.
Lieutenant-General Sir James Hills-Johnes,
B.C., G.C.B.
Lady Hills-Johnes.
General Sir Charles C. Johnson, G.C.B.
Admiral of the Fleet The Honourable Sir
Henry Keppel, G.C.B.
General Sir Peter Lumsden, G.C.B., C.S.I.
Lady Lumsden.
Admiral of the Fleet Sir Algernon Lyons,
G.C.B.
Lady Lyons.
Lieutenant-General Sir J. Chetham McLeod,
G.C.B.
Lady McLeod.
General Sir Henry Wylie Norman, G.C.B.,
G.C.M.G., C.I.E.
Lady Norman.
Admiral of the Fleet Sir Frederick Richards,
G.C.B.
Lieutenant-General Sir Baker Russell,
G.C.B., K.C.M.G.
Admiral of the Fleet Sir Nowell Salmon,
B.C.. G.C.B.
Lady Salmon.
Admiral Sir Edward Hobart Seymour,
O.M., G.C.B.
Admiral Sir Michael Culme-Seymour,
G.C.B., G.C.V.O.
Lady Culme-Seymour.
General Sir H. Evelyn Wood, D.C., G.C.B.,
G.C.M.G.
Colonel Sir Edward R. C. Bradford, G.C.B.,
K.C.S.I.
Lady Bradford.
Sir Francis Mowatt, G.C.B.
Miss Mowatt.
Sir Hugh Owen, G.C.B.
Lady Owen.
Sir Thomas Henry Sanderson, G.C.B.,
K.C.M.G.
Miss Sanderson.
Sir Henry M. Stanley, G.C.B., D.C.L.
Lady Stanley.
General Sir R. C. Taylor, G.C.B.
The Lady Jane Taylor.
General Sir H. N. Prendergast, B.C., G.C.B.
General Sir John Watson, S.C., G.C.B.
General Sir Martin Dillon, G.C.B., C.S.I.
General Sir R. Gipps, G.C.B.
Lady Gipps.
Lieutenant-General Sir R. Hume, G.C.B.
Lady Hume.
Lieutenant-General Sir Robert Grant,
G.C.B.
Lady Grant.
G.C.M.G.
Sir Henry Ernest G. Bm>er, G.C.M.G.
The Honourable Sir Charles Tupper, Bart.,
G.C.M.G., C.B.
Lady Tupper.
Sir John Kirk, G.C.M.G., K.C.B.
Lady Hart.
Sir Cecil Clementi Smith, G.C.M.G.
Lady Clementi Smith.
SirG. William Des Vreux, G.C.M.G.
Lady Des Vceux.
Sir Spenser B. St John, G.C.M.G.
Lady St John.
Sir Charles Rivers Wilson, G.C.M.G., C.B.
The Honourable Lady Rivers Wilson.
Sir Donald Currie, G.C.M.G.
Lady Currie.
Sir Henry A. Blake, G.C.M.G.
Lady Blake.
Her Highness The Ranee of Sarawak.
Sir Thomas Sutherland, G.C.M.G.
Lady Sutherland.
Sir T. Fowell Buxton, Bart., G.C.M.G.
Sir John Bramston, G.C.M.G., C.B.
Lady Bramston.
Lieutenant-General Sir F. Forestier Walker,
G.C.M.G., K.C.B.
Lady Forestier Walker.
Sir Henry H. Johnston, G.C.M.G., K.C.B.
Lady Johnston.
Sir Frederick M. Darley, G.C.M.G.
Lady Darley.
Sir Augustus W. L. Hemming, G.C.M.G.
Lady Hemming.
G.C.S.I.
Sir John Strachey, G.C.S.I., C.I.E.
Lady Strachey.
Sir Joseph D. Hooker, G.C.S.I., C.B.
Lady Hooker.
Sir Anthony P. MacDonnell, G.C.S.I.
Lady MacDonnell.
Lieutenant-General Sir Richard Strachey,
G.C.S.I.
Lady Strachey.
G. C.I.E.
Sir Alfred Lyall, G.C.I.E., K.C.B.
Lady Lyall.
Major-General Sir Owen Tudor Burne,
G.C.I.E., K.C.S.I.
The Lady Agnes Burne.
General Sir Crawford Chamberlain, G.C.I.E.
Lady Chamberlain.
Sir G. Faudel Phillips, Bart., G.C.I.E.
Lady Faudel Phillips.
Major-General Sir Edwin Collen, G.C.I.E.,
C.B.
Lady Collen.
Major-General Sir Alfred Gaselee, G.C.I.E.
Lady Gaselee.
G.C.V.O.
Sir Frederick Abel, Bart., G.C.V.O., K.C.B.
Admiral Sir Charles Hotham, G.C.V.O.,
K.C.B.
Lady Hotham.
396
APPENDIX I
No. 13.— JUDICATURE AND LAW.
i. ENGLISH JUDGES OF THE HIGH COURT,
NOT BEING PRIVY COUNCILLORS.
The Honourable Mr Justice Wills.
Lady Wills.
The Honourable Mr Justice Grantham.
Lady Grantham.
The Honourable Mr Justice Kekewich.
Lady Kekewich.
The Honourable Mr Justice Lawrance.
Lady Lawrance.
The Honourable Mr Justice Wright.
Lady Wright.
The Honourable Mr Justice Barnes.
Lady Barnes.
The Honourable Mr Justice Bruce.
Lady Bruce.
The Honourable Mr Justice Kennedy.
Lady Kennedy.
The Honourable Mr Justice Byrne.
Lady Byrne.
The Honourable Mr Justice Ridley.
Lady Ridley.
The Honourable Mr Justice Bigham.
Lady Bigham.
The Honourable Mr Justice Darling.
Lady Darling.
The Honourable Mr Justice Channell.
Lady Channell.
The Honourable Mr Justice Phillimore.
Lady Phillimore.
The Honourable Mr Justice Bucknill.
Lady Bucknill.
The Honourable Mr Justice Farwell.
Lady Farwell.
The Honourable Mr Justice Buckley.
Lady Buckley.
The Honourable Mr Justice Joyce.
Lady Joyce.
The Honourable Mr Justice Walton.
Lady Walton.
The Honourable Mr Justice Swinfen Eady.
Lady Swinfen Eady.
The Honourable Mr Justice Jelf.
Lady Jelf.
Vice-Chancellor Sir Samuel Hall, K.C.
COURT OF ARCHES.
Sir Arthur Charles.
Lady Charles.
2. SCOTTISH JUDGES OF THE HIGH COURT,
NOT BEING PRIVY COUNCILLORS.
Lord Adam.
Mrs Adam.
Lord M'Laren.
Mrs M'Laren.
Lord Trayner.
Mrs Trayner.
Lord Ky'llachy.
Lord Stormonth-Darling.
Mrs Stormonth-Darling.
Lord Low.
Mrs Low.
3. IRISH JUDGES OF THE HIGH COURT,
NOT BEING PRIVY COUNCILLORS.
The Honourable Mr Justice Boyd.
Mrs Boyd.
The Honourable Mr Justice Kenny.
Mrs Kenny.
The Honourable Mr Justice Barton.
Mrs Barton.
The Honourable Mr Justice Ross.
Mrs Ross.
The Honourable Mr Justice Meredith.
Mrs Meredith.
The Solicitor-General for Ireland.
Mrs Campbell.
LEGAL DEPARTMENTS.
TREASURERS OF INNS OF COURT.
His Honour Judge Willis.
Mrs Willis.
Mr Joseph Graham, K.C.
Mr Herbert P. Reed, K.C.
Mrs Reed.
BAR COUNCIL.
Sir Edward Clarke, K.C.
Lady Clarke.
Mr C. M. Warmington, K.C.
INCORPORATED LAW SOCIETY.
Mr John Hollams.
Mrs Hollams.
COUNTY COURT JUDGES.
His Honour Judge Stonor.
His Honour Judge Snagge.
His Honour Judge Bacon.
His Honour Judge Wood.
Mrs Wood.
His Honour Sir W. L. Selfe.
Lady Selfe.
His Honour Sir Horatio Lloyd.
COMMON SERJEANT.
Mr F. A. Bosanquet, K.C.
CITV OF LONDON COURTS.
His Honour Judge Lumley Smith, K.C.
ADMINISTRATIVE.
Mr Referee H. W. Verey.
Mr Registrar Loftus Leigh Pemberton.
Master J. R. Mellon
Master J. W. Hawkins.
Mr Registrar J. R. Brougham.
CHIEF MAGISTRATE, LONDON.
Sir A. de Rutzen.
Lady de Rutzen.
APPENDIX I
397
LONDON SESSIONS.
Mr W. R. McConnell.
Mrs W. R. McConnell.
MISCELLANEOUS.
Mr R. McCall, K.C. (English Bar).
Mr John Rankine, K.C. (Scottish Bar).
Mr G. L. Marfarlane (Scottish Bar).
Mrs G. L. Macfarlane.
Mr C. J. Matheson, K.C. (Irish Bar).
Mrs Matheson.
Mr T. L. O'Shaughnessy, K.C. (Irish Bar).
Mrs O'Shaughnessy.
The Honourable Sir Frederick Falkiner,
K.C. (Recorder of Dublin).
Miss Falkiner.
Mr. E. J. Swifte (Dublin Metropolitan Police).
Mrs Swifte.
Dr J. W. Barty, LL.D. (President of In-
corporated Society of Law Agents of
Scotland).
Mr Charles A. Stanwell, M.A. (Irish Law
Society).
No. 14. — ROYAL HOUSEHOLDS.
THE HOUSEHOLD OF HIS MAJESTY THE KING.
The Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery,
G.C.V.O. (Lord Steward).
The Countess of Pembroke and Mont-
gomery.
The Lady Beatrix Herbert.
The Lady Muriel Herbert.
The Earl of Clarendon, G.C.B. (Lord
Chamberlain).
The Lady Edith Villiers.
The Viscount Churchill, K.C.V.O. (Acting
Lord Chamberlain).
The Viscountess Churchill.
The Duke of Portland, K.G., G.C.V.O.
(Master of the Horse).
The Duchess of Portland.
Mr Victor Cavendish, M.P. (Treasurer).
The Lady Evelyn Cavendish.
The Viscount Valentia, M.P., C.B., M.V.O.
(Comptroller).
The Viscountess Valentia.
The Honourable Kathleen Annesley.
The Honourable Helen Annesley.
Sir Alexander F. Acland-Hood, Bart., M.P.
(Vice-Chamberlain).
The Honourable Lady Acland-Hood.
Miss Margaret Acland-Hood.
The Lord Farquhar, K.C.V.O. (Master of
the Household).
The Lady Farquhar.
The Lord Bel per (Captain Gentlemen at
Arms).
The Lady Belper.
The Honourable Norah Strutt.
The Honourable Hilda Strutt.
The Earl Waldegrave (Captain Yeomen of
the Guard).
The Countess Waldegrave.
General The Right Honourable Sir Dighton
Probyn, B.C., G.C.B. , G.C.V.O.,
K.C.S.I. (Keeper of Privy Purse).
The Lord Knollys, G.C.V.O., K.C.B.,
K.C.M.G. (Private Secretary).
The Lady Knollys.
The Honourable Edward Knollys.
The Honourable Alexandra Knollys.
Major-General Sir Arthur Ellis, G.C.V.O.,
C.S.I. (Comptroller of the Lord
Chamberlain's Department and Extra
Equerry to His Majesty).
The Honourable Lady Ellis.
Miss Ellis.
Major Charles Frederick, M.V.O. (Deputy
Master of the Household).
The Lord Bishop of London (Dean of the
Chapels Royal).
The Lord Bishop of Winchester (Prelate of
the Garter and Clerk of the Closet).
Mrs Randall Davidson.
The Lord Bishop of Ely (Lord High Al-
moner).
The Lady Alwyne Compton.
The Very Reverend Dean of Windsor
(Domestic Chaplain).
Miss Emily Eliot.
Miss Alice Eliot.
The Reverend Canon F. A. J. Hervey,
M.V.O. (Domestic Chaplain).
Mrs F. Hervey.
Miss Alexandra Hervey.
LORDS IN WAITING.
The Earl of Denbigh.
The Countess of Denbigh.
The Earl Howe.
The Countess Howe.
The Lord Kenyon.
The Earl of Kintore, G.C.M.G.
The Countess of Kintore.
The Lady Ethel Keith-Falconer.
The Lady Hilda Keith-Falconer.
The Lord Lawrence.
The Lady Lawrence.
The Honourable Anna Lawrence.
The Lord Suffield, G.C.V.O., K.C.B,
(Master of the Robes).
The Lady Suffield.
398
APPENDIX I
GROOMS IN WAITING.
Captain Walter Campbell, C.V.O.
Mrs Walter Campbell.
General Godfrey Clerk, C.B.
Mrs Godfrey Clerk.
Colonel Lord Edward Pelham Clinton,
G.C.V.O..K.C.B.
Vice-Admiral Sir J. Fullerton. G.C.V.O.,
C.B.
Lady Fullerton.
Miss Fullerton.
The Honourable Sidney Greville, C.V.O. ,
C.B. (also Private Secretary to The
Queen).
Sir A. Condie Stephen, K.C.M.G., K.C.V.O.,
C.B.
The Honourable Henry Stonor, M.V.O.
EXTRA GROOMS IN WAITING.
Major-General Sir T. Dennehy. K.C.I.E.
Sir Maurice Holzmann, K.C.V.O., C.B.
The Honourable A. G. Yorke, C.V.O.
General Sir Michael A. S. Biddulph, G.C.B.
Lady Biddulph.
Miss Nina Biddulph.
EQUERRIES IN WAITING.
Major-General Sir H. Ewart, K.C.B.,
G.C.V.O. (Crown Equerry).
The Lady Evelyn Ewart.
Lieutenant-Colonel Arthur Davidson, C.B.,
C.V.O.
Lieutenant-Colonel The Honourable H.
Legge, C.V.O.
The Honourable Mrs Legge.
Captain F. E. G. Ponsonby, C.V.O. (Assist-
ant Private Secretary and Keeper of
the Privy Purse).
Mrs Ponsonby.
Major-General Sir Stanley de A. C. Clarke,
K.C.V.O., C.M.G.
Lady Clarke.
Miss Clarke.
Captain The Honourable Seymour Fortescue,
C.V.O., C.M.G., R.N.
Captain G. L. Holford, C.V.O., C.I.E.
The Honourable J. H. Ward.
HONORARY EQUERRIES.
General The Viscount Bridport, G.C.B.
General The Duke of Grafton, K.G.
EXTRA EQUERRIES.
Major-General J. C. Russell.
Mrs Russell.
Miss Russell.
Miss Alexandra Russell.
Lieutenant-Colonel Sir Nigel Kingscote,
G.C.V.O., K.C.B. (also Paymaster of
the Household).
The Lady Emily Kingscote,
(Bath
Colonel The Right Honourable Sir Fleetwood
I. Edwards, G.C.V.O., K.C.B. (also
Serjeant-at-Arms, House of Lords).
Lady Edwards.
Colonel The Honourable Sir W. Carington
K.C.V.O., C.B. (also Comptroller and
Treasurer of the Household of The
Prince of Wales).
The Honourable Lady Carington.
Lieutenant - Colonel Sir Arthur Bigge
G.C.V.O., K.C.B., K.C.M.G. (also
Private Secretary to The Prince of
Wales).
Lady Bigge.
Miss Bigge.
Captain The Honourable Alwyn Greville.
The Honourable Mrs Greville.
Major Count A. E. W. Gleichen, C.V O
C.M.G., D.S.O.
The Lord Marcus Beresford, M.V.O. (also
Manager of the Thoroughbred Stud)
Admiral Sir H. F. Stephenson, G.C V O
K.C.B.
Lieutenant-Colonel A. Balfour Haig, C V O
C.M.G.
The Honourable Mrs Haig.
Miss Haig.
Miss Cecily Haig.
Major-General Sir John McNeill
G.C.V.O., K.C.B.. K.C.M.G.'
King of Arms).
CEREMONIES.
Colonel The Honourable Sir William Colville
K. C.V.O.. C.B. (Master of the Cere-
monies).
The Honourable Lady Colville.
The Honourable Richard Moreton (Marshal
of the Ceremonies).
The Honourable Mrs Moreton.
Mr R. F. Synge, C.M.G. (Deputy Marshal of
the Ceremonies).
Mrs R. F. Synge.
GENTLEMEN USHERS.
The Right Honourable Sir Spencer Ponsonby-
Fane, G.C.B. (also Gentleman Usher
to the Sword of State).
Major-General J. P. Brabazon, C.V.O., C.B.
Lieutenant-Colonel Arthur Collins C B
M.V.O.
Captain The Honourable Otway Cuffe.
The Honourable Mrs Cuffe.
Mr Lionel Cust, M.V.O. (also Surveyor of
Pictures and Works of Art).
The Honourable Mrs Lionel Cust.
Mr Montagu C. Eliot.
Mr H. D. Erskine (of Cardross) (Gentleman
Usher to the Robes).
The Lady Horatia Erskine.
Miss Rachel Erskine.
Mr Walter Erskine.
APPENDIX I
399
Major The Honourable Arthur Hay.
Mr C. J. Innes Kerr.
Colonel Cuthbert Larking.
The Lady Adela Larking.
Miss Larking.
Mr Arnold Royle, C.B.
Mrs Arnold Royle.
Miss Victoria Royle.
Major-General J. R. Slade, C.B.
Mrs Slade.
Miss Slade.
Captain W. J. Stopford, C.B.
Mrs Stopford.
Miss Nina Stopford.
Miss Hilda Stopford.
Mr Brooke Taylor.
Mrs Brooke Taylor.
The Honourable Arthur Walsh.
The Lady Clementine Walsh.
Mr Horace West.
Mrs Horace West.
MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT.
Sir William Broadbent, Bart., K.C.V.O.,
M.D. (Physician in Ordinary).
Lady Broadbent.
Miss Broadbent.
Sir James Reid, Bart., G.C.V.O., K.C.B.,
M.D. (Physician in Ordinary).
The Honourable Lady Reid.
Sir Francis Laking, Bart., G.C.V.O., M.D.
(Physician in Ordinary).
Lady Laking.
The Lord Lister, O.M., Sergeant Surgeon.
Sir Frederick Treves, Bart., K.C.V.O., C.B.,
F.R.C.S. (Sergeant Surgeon to the
Household).
Lady Treves.
Sir Thomas Barlow, Bart., K.C.V.O., M.D.
(Physician to the Household).
Lady Barlow.
Mr H. W. Allingham, F.R.C.S. (Surgeon to
the Household).
Mr P. Heron Watson, M.D., LL.D. ; and
Mr Alexander Ogston, M.D. (Honorary
Surgeons to His Majesty in Scotland).
Sir William Thomson, M.D. (Honorary
Surgeon to His Majesty in Ireland).
Lady Thomson.
MISCELLANEOUS (OTHER HOUSEHOLD
OFFICERS).
General Sir Hugh Gough, $.(£., G.C.B.
(Keeper of the Regalia).
Lady Gough.
The Rev. Edgar Sheppard, D.D., Sub-
Dean of the Chapels Royal.
Mrs Sheppard.
Mr R. R. Holmes, C.V.O. (Librarian).
Mrs R. R. Holmes.
Miss Holmes.
Herr Von Pfyffer, M.V.O. (German Secre-
tary).
Mr George Courroux, M.V.O. (Secretary,
Board of Green Cloth).
Mrs George Courroux.
Mr W. M. Gibson, M.V.O. (Secretary, Privy
Purse).
Mrs W. M. Gibson.
Mr Daniel Tupper, M.V.O. (Assistant
Comptroller of the Lord Chamberlain's
Department).
Mrs Daniel Tupper.
Miss Cecil Tupper.
Mr Thomas Kingscote, M.V.O. (Gentleman
of the Wine Cellars).
The Honourable Mrs Kingscote.
Mr G. A. Redford (Examiner of Plays).
Mrs G. A. Redford.
Mr F. M. Bryant, M.V.O. (Assistant Secre-
tary to Privy Purse).
Mrs F. M. Bryant.
Colonel Jennings (Chief Clerk of the Board of
Green Cloth).
Mrs Jennings.
Mr H. L. Hertslet, M.V.O. (Chief Clerk of
the Lord Chamberlain's Department).
Mrs Hertslet.
Miss Hertslet.
Mr Alfred Austin (Poet Laureate).
Mrs Alfred Austin.
Mr Guy Laking, M.V.O. (Keeper of the
King's Armoury).
Mrs Guy Laking.
GOLD STICKS.
General The Lord Chelmsford, G.C.B. ,
G. C.V.O.
The Lady Chelmsford.
Field-Marshal The Right Honourable
Viscount Wolseley, K.P., G.C.B.,
G.C.M.G.
The Viscountess Wolseley.
The Honourable Frances Wolseley.
Field-Marshal His Highness Prince Edward
of Saxe-Weimar, K.P., G.C.B,
G. C.V.O.
Her Highness Princess Edward of Saxe-
Weimar.
SILVER STICK IN WAITING.
Lieutenant-Colonel Napier Miles, C.B. ,
M.V.O. (ist Life Guards), on 26th
June.
Mrs Napier Miles.
Colonel J. Galley, M.V.O. (is* Life Guards),
on Qth August.
Mrs Galley.
SILVER STICK ADJUTANT.
Captain P. B. Cookson (ist Life Guards).
Mrs Cookson.
400
APPENDIX I
FIELD OFFICER IN BRIGADE WAITING.
Colonel H. Fludyer, C.V.O. (Scots Guards).
Mrs Fludyer.
ADJUTANT IN BRIGADE WAITING.
Captain The Honourable W. P. Hore
Ruthven, D.S.O. (Master of Ruthven)
(Scots Guards).
The Honourable Mrs Hore Ruthven.
GENTLEMEN-AT-ARMS.
Colonel Sir Henry H. Oldham (Lieutenant).
Lady Oldham.
Miss Sybil Oldham.
Colonel Sir Aubone George Fife (Standard
Bearer).
Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Fletcher (Clerk of
the Cheque).
Mrs Fletcher.
Lieutenant-Colonel J. G. Sandeman, M.V.O.
(Sub-Officer).
Mrs Sandeman.
Miss Ella Sandeman.
YEOMEN OF THE GUARD.
Colonel Sir Reginald Hennell, D.S.O.
(Lieutenant).
Colonel Richard G. Ellison (Ensign).
Mrs Ellison.
Major E. H. Elliot (Clerk of the Cheque).
The Dowager Countess of Limerick.
The
THE HOUSEHOLD OF HER MAJESTY QUEEN ALEXANDRA.
Culross. K.T.
Viscount Colville of
(Lord Chamberlain).
The Viscountess Colville of Culross.
The Earl of Gosford, K.P. (Vice-Chamber-
lain).
The Countess of Gosford.
The Lady Alexandra Acheson.
The Lady Mary Acheson.
The Lady Theo Acheson.
The Earl de Grey, K.C.V.O. (Treasurer).
The Countess de Grey.
The Lady Juliet Lowther.
Colonel J. F. Brocklehurst, C.V.O., C.B.
(Equerry).
Mrs Brocklehurst.
MISTRESS OF THE ROBES.
The Duchess of Buccleuch and The Duke of
Buccleuch, K.G.
The Lady Constance Scott.
LADIES OF THE BEDCHAMBER.
The Countess of Antrim and The Earl of
Antrim.
The Lady Evelyn McDonnell.
The Dowager Countess of Lytton, C. I.
The Lady Constance Lytton.
The Countess of Macclesfield (extra).
The Lady Evelyn Parker.
The Dowager Countess of Morton (extra).
WOMEN OF THE BEDCHAMBER.
The Honourable Mrs Charles Hardinge and
The Honourable Charles Hardinge,
C.B.
The Honourable Charlotte Knollys.
The Lady Alice Stanley and The Lord
Stanley, M.P.
MAIDS OF HONOUR.
The Honourable Mary Dyke.
The Honourable Sylvia Edwardes.
The Honourable Dorothy Vivian.
The Honourable Violet Vivian.
THE HOUSEHOLDS OF THEIR ROYAL HIGHNESSES THE PRINCE AND
PRINCESS OF WALES.
His ROYAL HIGHNESS THE PRINCE
OF WALES.
The Lord Wenlock, G.C.S.I., G.C.I.E.,
K.C.B. (Lord of the Bedchamber).
The Lady Wenlock.
The Lord Chesham, K.C.B. (Lord of the
Bedchamber).
The Lady Chesham.
The Honourable Lilah Cavendish.
Colonel The Honourable Sir W. Carington,
K.C.V.O., C.B. (Comptroller and
Treasurer).
The Honourable Lady Carington.
Lieutenant-Colonel Sir Arthur Bigge,
G.C.V.O., K.C.B., K.C.M.G. (Private
Secretary).
Lady Bigge.
Miss Bigge.
Captain The Honourable Charles Fitz-
William (Master of the Stables).
The Honourable Mrs Charles Fitz-
William.
Mr C. A. Cripps, M.P. (Attorney-General).
Miss Cripps.
Captain The Honourable Derek Keppel,
C.M.G., M.V.O. (Equerry).
The Honourable Mrs Derek Keppel.
Commander Sir Charles Cust, Bart., R.N.,
C.M.G., M.V.O. (Equerry).
Captain Viscount Crichton, D.S.O.
Commander B. E. Godfrey-Faussett, R.N.
(Equerry).
APPENDIX I
401
Captain R. E. Weymss, M.V.O., R.N.
(Extra- Equerry).
Major). H. Bor, C.M.G. (Extra-Equerry).
Mrs Bor.
Reverend Canon J. Dalton, C.V.O., C.M.G.
(Chaplain).
Mrs J. Dalton.
HER ROYAL HIGHNESS THE PRINCESS
OF WALES.
The Earl of Shaftesbury (Chamberlain).
The Countess of Shaftesbury.
The Countess of Airlie ( Lady of the Bed-
chamber).
The Countess of Bradford (Lady of the
Bedchamber) and the Earl of Brad-
ford.
The Lady Florence Bridgeman.
The Lady Eva Dugdale (Woman of the Bed-
chamber) and Mr F. Dugdale.
The Lady Mary Lygon (Woman of the Bed-
chamber).
Honourable J. H. Coke.
The Lady Katherine Coke (Extra Woman of
the Bedchamber).
The Honourable Alexander Nelson Hood
(Private Secretary).
OTHER ROYAL HOUSEHOLDS.*
HER ROYAL HIGHNESS THE PRINCESS
VICTORIA.
The Honourable Lady Musgrave (Lady in
Waiting) and Sir Richard Musgrave, Bart.
THEIR ROYAL HIGHNESSES PRINCE AND
PRINCESS CHARLES OF DENMARK.
Commander Carstensen (Aide-de-Camp,
Royal Danish Navy).
Lieutenant C. Cunninghame Graham, R.N.
THEIR ROYAL HIGHNESSES THE DUKE
AND DUCHESS OF CONNAUGHT AND
STRATHEARN, AND THE PRINCESSES
MARGARET AND VICTORIA PATRICIA
OF CONNAUGHT.
Colonel Alfred Egerton, C.V.O., C.B.
(Comptroller and Treasurer).
The Honourable Mrs Egerton.
Major M. McNeill (Equerry).
Mrs McNeill.
Major E. F. Clayton (Aide-de-Camp).
Mrs Clayton.
Captain W. F. Lascelles (Aide-de-Camp).
The Lady Sybil Lascelles.
Sir Maurice FitzGerald, Bart., and Lady
FitzGerald.
Lady Elphinstone (Lady in Waiting,
Honorary).
Miss Victoria Elphinstone.
Miss Irene Elphinstone.
Miss Olive Elphinstone.
His ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCE ARTHUR
OF CONNAUGHT, K.G.
Captain William Wyndham (Extra Equerry
to His Royal Highness the Duke of
Connaught).
THEIR ROYAL HIGHNESSES THE PRINCE
AND PRINCESS CHRISTIAN OF SCHLES-
WIG-HOLSTEIN, AND THEIR HIGH-
NESSES THE PRINCESS VICTORIA AND
THE PRINCE ALBERT OF SCHLESWIG-
HOLSTEIN.
Major Cecil Wray (Equerry to His Royal
Highness Prince Christian), and Mrs
Cecil Wray.
Captain E. W. Russell (Gentleman in Waiting
to His Highness Prince Albert).
Mrs W. H. Dick-Cunynghame (Lady in
Waiting).
The Lady Susan Leslie- Melville (Lady in
Waiting, Extra).
The Lady Agneta Montagu (Lady in Waiting,
Extra) and Rear-Admiral The Honour-
able Victor Montagu.
Miss Helena Montagu.
Baroness von und zu Egloffstein (Lady in
Waiting, Extra).
Mrs George Grant-Gordon (Lady in Waiting,
Extra).
HER ROYAL HIGHNESS THE PRINCESS
BEATRICE, PRINCESS HENRY OF
BATTENBERG, AND THEIR HIGH-
NESSES THE PRINCESS ENA AND THE
PRINCES ALEXANDER AND MAURICE
OF BATTENBERG.
Miss Mary Bulteel (Lady in Waiting).
Miss Freda Biddulph.
Lieutenant-Colonel F. L. Colborne( Equerry).
1 The complete Households of Their Majesties and of T.R.H. The Prince and Princess
of Wales have been given above, although many of the names are repeated elsewhere.
In the other Royal Households those names which appear in the processions are in
most cases not repeated here.
2 C
402 APPENDIX I
HER ROYAL HIGHNESS THE PRINCESS His ROYAL HIGHNESS THE DUKE OF
BEATRICE OF SAXE-COBUKG AND SAXE-COBURG AND GOTHA (DUKEOF
GOTHA. ALBANY).
Lieutenant-Colonel A. Balfour Haig, C.V.O.,
The Lady Mpnson (Lad, -in Waiting to Her c.M.G. (Extra Equerry to the King).
Royal Highness The Duchess of Coburg). Lieutenant von Gillhaussen, M. V.O.
His ROYAL HIGHNESS THE DUKE OF
THEIR ROYAL HIGHNESSES THE DUCHESS
OF ALBANY AND THE PRINCESS ALICE Mrs FitzGeorge.
OF ALBANY. Captain Edward St John Mildmay (Equerry).
Lieutenant - General R. Bateson (Equerry,
Lady Collins (Lady in Waiting). Extra).
Colonel Stanier Waller, R.E. (Equerry, Major - General Albert Williams (Equerry,
Honorary). Extra).
HER LATE MAJESTY QUEEN VICTORIA'S HOUSEHOLD.
BEDCHAMBER WOMEN. The Honourable Mary Hughes.
The Honourable Ethel Cadogan. The Honourable Bertha Lambart.
The Honourable Lady Hamilton Gordon. The Honourable Aline Majendie.
The Honourable Harriet Phipps. The Honourable Mary Lascelles.
BEDCHAMBER WOMEN (EXTRA). Mr Conway Seymour.
The Lady Elizabeth Biddulph. Colonel H. D. Browne.
The Honourable Mrs Alaric Grant. Colonel Sir Walter George Stirling, Bart.
The Honourable Mrs Bernard Mallet. Miss Stirling.
The Honourable Mrs Wellesley. Mr M. Biddulph.
MAIDS OF HONOUR. Captain Alaric Grant (late R.N.).
The Honourable Frances Mary Drummond. Mr Bernard Mallet.
ROYAL YACHTS.
' ' VICTORIA AND ALBERT. " . . QSBORNE. ' '
Commodore Honourable Hedwortb Lambton, Captain Charles Anson, M.V.O. , R. N.
C.V.O., C.B., A.D.C , R.N Lieutenant Howard Rowley, R.N.
Commander Richard Purefoy, R.N.
Commander George Mansell, R.N. „
Fleet Paymaster William Bowen, R.N. ALBERTA.
Fleet Engineer James Bennett, R.N. Staff-Captain George Broad, M.V.O., R.N.
No. 15. — BARONETS.
Sir Hickman Bacon, Bart. Sir H. Doughty-Tichborne, Bart.
Sir James de Hoghton, Bart. Lady Doughty-Tichborne.
Lady de Hoghton. The Reverend Sir William Vincent, Bart.
Sir John Shelley, Bart. Lady Vincent.
Lady Shelley. The Reverend Sir James Phillips, Bart.
Sir Richard Musgrave, Bart. Lady Phillips.
The Honourable The Lady Musgrave. Sir Reginald Barnewall, Bart.
Sir Robert Gresley, Bart. Sir Arthur Hazlerigg, Bart.
The Lady Frances Gresley. Sir Thomas Burnett, Bart.
Sir Richard Harington, Bart. Lady Burnett.
Lady Harington. Sir William Johnston, Bart.
Sir Philip Grey-Egerton, Bart. Colonel Sir Charles Leslie, Bart., C.B%
Lady Grey-Egerton. Lady Leslie.
Sir Griffith Boynton, Bart. Sir Arthur P. F. Aylmer, Bart.
Lady Boynton. Sir William Stuart Forbes, Bart.
APPENDIX I
403
No. 1 6.— ECCLESIASTICS.
CHAPLAINS-IN-ORDINARY.
The Dean of Windsor (The Very Reverend
Philip Frank Eliot, D.D.), Domestic
Chaplain to the King.
The Sub-Dean of His Majesty's Chapels Royal
(The Reverend Edgar Sheppard, D.D.).
Mrs Sheppard.
The Three Deputy Clerks of the Closet—
The Very Reverend Frederick William
Farrar, D.D. (Dean of Canterbury).
Mrs Farrar.
The Reverend Canon John Neale Dalton,
C.V.O., C.M.G., M.A.
The Reverend William Rowe Jolley, M.A.
Mrs Jolley.
The Reverend James Williams Adams, B.A.,
39.C.
The Reverend Canon Alfred Ainger, LL.D.
The Reverend John Henry Joshua Ellison,
The Reverend Canon James Fleming, B.D.
Mrs Fleming.
The Reverend Prebendary Edgar Charles
Sumner Gibson, D.D.
Mrs Gibson.
The Reverend Canon Frederick Alfred John
Hervey, M.V.O., M.A.
Mrs F. Hervey.
Miss Alexandra Hervey.
The Reverend Canon Campbell Moberly,
D.D.
Mrs Moberly.
The Reverend Canon Teignmouth- Shore,
M.A.
Mrs Teignmouth-Shore.
The Reverend William Conybeare.
The Reverend Canon Clement Smith. M.V.O. ,
M.A.
Mrs Clement Smith.
The Reverend The Hon. Leonard Francis
Tyrwhitt, M.A.
The Reverend Arthur G. Ingram.
Mrs Ingram.
CHAPLAIN-IN-ORDINARY (SCOTTISH).
Reverend J. R. Mitford Mitchell, D.D.
THE DEAN AND CANONS OF WESTMINSTER.
The Dean of Westminster (The Very Reverend George Granville Bradley, D.D.), Dean of
the Order of the Bath.
The Reverend Canon Robinson Duckworth, D.D. , Sub-Dean.
The Venerable Basil Wilberforce, Archdeacon of Westminster, D.D.
The Reverend Canon J. Armitage Robinson, D.D.
The Reverend Canon H. H. Henson, B.D.
The Right Reverend Bishop J. E. C. Welldon, D.D.
MINOR CANONS OF WESTMINSTER.
The Rev. H. G. Daniell-Bainbridge.
The Rev. J. H. Cheadle.
Mrs Cheadle.
The Rev. T. Greatorex.
Mrs Greatorex.
The Rev. T. R. Hine-Haycock.
The Rev. J. H. T. Perkins.
Mrs Perkins.
The Rev. D. Aitken-Sneath.
Mrs Aitken-Sneath.
THE DEAN AND CANONS OF WINDSOR.
The Dean of Windsor (The Very Reverend
P. F. Eliot, D.D.), Registrar of the
Order of the Garter.
The Reverend Canon J. M. Dalton, C.V.O.,
C.M.G.
The Right Reverend Bishop Alfred Barry, D. D.
The Reverend The Marquess of Normanby.
The Reverend Canon R. Gee.
THE DEAN AND CANONS OF ST PAUL'S.
The Dean of St Paul's (The Very Reverend
R. Gregory, D.D.).
Mrs Gregory.
The Reverend Canon Scott Holland.
The Reverend Canon Newbolt.
The Right Reverend Bishop of Stepney.
The Venerable W. M. Sinclair, Archdeacon
of London.
PROLOCUTORS OF THE LOWER HOUSE
OF CONVOCATION.
The Venerable Reginald Prideaux Lightfoot,
D.D.
The Worshipful Thomas Espinell Espin, D. D.
No. 17. — CHURCH OF SCOTLAND AND OTHER RELIGIOUS BODIES.
General
SCOTTISH ESTABLISHED CHURCH.
The Right Rev. James Curdie Russell,
D.D., the Moderator of the
Assembly.
404
APPENDIX I
The Very Rev. James Mitchell, D.D., the
Ex-Moderator of the General Assembly.
The Very Rev. Norman Macleod, D.D., the
Second Clerk of the General Assembly.
The Very Rev. John Pagan.
The Reverend J. Cameron Lees, D.D., Dean
of the Chapel Royal.
Mr William John Menzies, W.S., the Agent
of the Church.
UNITED FREE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND.
The Reverend Robert Howie, D.D., Moder-
ator of the General Assembly.
The Reverend Walter Ross Taylor, D.D.
The Reverend James Stewart, D.D.
The Reverend Principal Hutton, D.D.
Mr Robert Russell Simpson, W.S. (Depute
Clerk of the General Assembly of the
United Free Church of Scotland).
EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF SCOTLAND.
The Primus, The Most Reverend James B.
Kelly, D.D.
The Bishop of St Andrews.
The Reverend James Heron, B.A., D.D.
The Reverend Thomas Allen, D.D. (Presi-
dent, Wesleyan Methodist Conference).
The Reverend David James Waller, D.D.,
Secretary, Wesleyan Methodist Con-
ference).
The Reverend T. Mitchell (President,
Primitive Methodist Conference).
The Reverend D. Brook, D.C.L., M.A.
(President of the United Methodist Free
Church).
The Reverend G. Candlin (President, Metho-
dist New Connexion Conference).
Mr John Morland, J.P. (Clerk of the Society
of Friends).
The Reverend A. H. Drysdale, M.A.
(Moderator of the Presbyterian Church
of England).
The Archimandrite of the Greek Church.
The Reverend Richard A. Armstrong, B.A.
(President of the British and Foreign
Unitarian Association).
The Chief Rabbi, Dr Hermann Adler.
The Reverend T. J. Wheldon (Moderator of
the Welsh Calvinistic Methodist Church).
The Very Reverend Eugene Smirnoff (Chap-
lain of the Russian Church in London).
The Rev. G. S. Barrett, D.D. (President of
the Baptist Union).
The President of the National Free Church
Council.
Mr Evan Spicer, J.P. (Representative of the
Deputies of Protestant Dissenters).
No. 1 8. — UNIVERSITIES.
(Only the academical titles of the representatives of Oxford and Cambridge appear on the
Earl Marshal's Lists. The names have been supplied by the Vice-Chancellors of
the two Universities.)
OXFORD.
The Vice-Chancellor, Mr David Binning
Monro, M.A., Provost of Oriel College.
The Senior Proctor, Mr A. B. Poynton, M.A.,
University College.
The Junior Proctor, Mr P. Elford, M.A., St
John's College.
The Dean of Christ Church, The Very
Reverend Thomas B. Strong, D.D.
The Regius Professor of Divinity, The
Reverend W. Ince, D.D., Christ Church.
The Regius Professor of Civil Law, Dr H.
Goudy, D.C.L., All Souls' College.
The Regius Professor of Greek, Mr Ingram
By water, M.A., Exeter College.
CAMBRIDGE.
The Vice-Chancellor, Dr Adolphus William
Ward, Litt. D. , Master of Peterhouse.
The Registrary, Mr John Willis Clark, M.A.,
Trinity College.
The Public Orator, Dr John Edwin Sandys,
Litt.D., Fellow of St John's College.
The Senior Proctor, The Reverend Thomas
Alfred Walker, LL.D., Fellow of Peter-
house.
Sir George Stokes, Bart., LL.D., Fellow of
Pembroke College : Lucasian Professor
of Mathematics.
The Master of Trinity College, The Reverend
Henry Montague Butler, D.D.
SCOTLAND.
Principal J. Donaldson, LL.D.
Principal Reverend A. Stewart, D.D.
Principal Professor G. G. Ramsay.
Principal Reverend J Marshall Lang, D.D.
Professor Sir Ludovic Grant, Bart.
Professor Mackay.
IRELAND.
( The names of no representatives of Trinity
College, Dublin, appear on the Earl
Marshal's Lists. )
Professor Johnson Symington, M.D., Queen's
College, Belfast.
APPENDIX I
405
Sir R. Blennerhasset, Bart. (President),
Queen's College, Cork.
Mr A. Anderson, M.A. (President), Queen's
College, Galway.
Dr A. Robertson, D.D., LL.D., Vice-Chan-
cellor, University of London.
The Very Reverend The Dean of Durham,
Warden, University of Durham.
Dr Alfred Hopkinson, LL.D., K.C., Vice-
Chancellor, Victoria University, Man-
chester.
Mr C. G. Beale, M.A., Vice-Chancellor,
University of Birmingham.
Mr Ivor James, Registrar, University of
Wales.
No. 19. — THE CORONATION ORCHESTRA AND CHOIR.*
Sir Frederick Bridge, M.V.O., Mus. Doc. (Organist of Westminster Abbey, Director of the
Coronation Music and Conductor in Chief).
Sir Walter Parratt, M.V.O., Mus. Doc. (Master of the King's Musick), (Assistant Con-
ductor^
Sir George Clement Martin, M.V.O., Mus. Doc. (Assistant Conductor).
Dr Joseph C. Bridge (Assistant Conductor).
Mr W. G. Alcock, Mus. Bac. (Organist).
Mr W. J. Winter (Assistant Organist).
THE CORONATION ORCHESTRA.
TRUMPETS.
EXTRA DRUMS.
PLAYERS IN TH
FIRST VIOLINS.
Gibson, Alfred
(Leader of the
E KING'S BAND.
CONTRABASSES.
Winterbottom, C.
Hobday, C.
Short, W.
Paque, P. J. (Sergeant
Trumpeter to the
King).
Chaine, V. A.
HARP.
Timothy, Miss
Music).
TROMBONE.
Miriam .
Bent, A.
FLUTES.
Vivian, A. P.
Lettington, W. A.
SECRETARY AND
Eayres,' W. H.
Hollis, H. W.
TIMPANI.
LIBRARIAN.
Hopkinson, E.
OBOES.
Henderson, C.
Mapleson, Alfred.
SECOND VIOLINS.
Malsch, W.
PLAYERS NOT IN THE KING'S BAND.
Betjemann, G. H.
Landela, D.
FIRST VIOLINS. PittS, J.
Blagrove, S.
Slocombe, A. J.
Sutcliffe, W.
CLARINETS.
Egerton, J.
Bridge, Frank.
Lardner, E.
Roberts, Ellis.
Wilby, G. H.
VIOLAS.
Draper, C.
Lewis, H.
VIOLAS.
Hobday, A.
Cox, J. B. (Deputy for
E. Tomlinson).
Kreuz, E.
BASSOONS.
James, E. F.
James, W. G.
Marriott, V.
Parfitt, E. W.
Parker, W. Frye.
Richardson, S.
Lawrence, T.
Troutbeck, J.
VIOLONCELLOS.
Shelton, E.
HORNS.
SECOND VIOLINS.
Boatwright, J.
VIOLONCELLOS.
Busby, T. R.
Gunniss, J. W.
Hambleton, J. E.
Ould, C.
Borsdorf, A.
Lewis, P.
Werg, T.
Hann, W. C. Smith, J.
O'Brien, E.
Woolhouse, E.
1 The names of the musicians and of the singers do not appear in the Earl Marshal's
lists. It has been thought right to add them for a twofold reason. In the first place,
the performers of the musical portion of the service, which was a most beautiful feature
of the Coronation, deserve to have their names recorded. In the second place, in all
probability some of the little choir-boys will be among the longest survivors of the
persons who took part in the Coronation. In years to come it will be interesting to
identify them, especially if any of them come to fame, as did the lamented Sir Arthur
Sullivan, who began his musical career as one of the children of the Chapel Royal, and
who composed the Introit sung before the Communion of their Majesties, after the
Coronation, which was adapted from an oratorio by the skilful hands of Sir Frederick
Bridge— himself a former chorister.
406
APPENDIX I
CONTRABASSES.
TROMBONES.
Sf Georges Chapel, Windsor.
Carrodus, E. A.
Case, G.
Atkinson, R. D. T^v. H G
Maney, E. F.
Matt, A. E.
Barber, C. R.
Lister, H. S.
Platt, G.
Bowen, D. N. H.
Macbean, I G
Waud, J. Haydn.
CONTRA TROMBONE.
Daman, G. W.
Macbean. R. E.
PICCOLO.
Matt, John.
Deane, Arthur.
Mallaly. C.
Wood, D. S.
Draper, W. R.
Marshall, D.
TUBA.
Exham, S. G. B.
McCallum, C. D.
HORN.
Barlow, Harry.
Fell, L. F. R.
Newton, B. St. J.
Brain, A. E.
Goodwin, L. H.
Owen, E. A. C.
TRUMPETS.
EXTRA DRUMS.
Johnson, G. B.
Ponsonby, N. E.
Morrow, W.
Solomon, J.
Henderson, S.
Schroeder, J.
Johnson, J. B.
Law, J. C. T.
Raikes, J. F. C.
Van der Noot, G.
FANFARE TRUMPETERS.
St Paul's Cathedral.
(From the Royal Military School of Music,
Kneller Hall. )
Aldridge, P. J. ' Montgomery. W.
Belham, E. D. j Phelps, P. J.
O'Keefe, W. (Professor).
Adams, T. A. (Student).
Banbury, R.
Featherstone, W. A. ,
T7_...,l_,_ T
Bevan, L. P.
Brooker, H. W. J.
Dancey, A. H.
Daws, H.
Denman, J. A.
Pickering, J.
Pritchard. E. W.
Pritchard, J. H.
Punchard, E. G.
Rayment, A. H.
rowies, J. ,
Murray, E. F.
Saunders, O.
Tyre, J. V.
Eyre, L. B.
Fenn, M. H. I.
Root, H. W.
Sadler, G. F.
Sadler, J. A.
Sylvester, F. ,
And the two Trumpeters of the King's Band.
Gibbs, G.
Guy, L.
Sillitoe, P. J.
Smith, S. P.
Orchestral Secretary, Mr J. E. Borland.
Knight, H. J. K.
Spark, H. K.
Assistant ditto, - - Mr W. D. Borland.
Lyon, S. T.
Young, A. N.
Orchestral Librarian, Mr T. J. Crawford.
The Chapel Royal, Hampton Court Palace.
Fanfare Steward - Mr J. M. Coward.
Fox, W. S. I Mould, H.
( Mr H. Crouch Batche-
Kemslt-y, A. G. E.
Band Stewards - - < lor.
(MrNeilForsyth.
The Chapel Royal, Savoy.
Organ Blower - - Mr Charles Groves.
Brandle, S. Crow, R. H. G.
THE CORONATION CHOIR.
The Royal Collegiate Chapel of St /Catherine's,
Regent's Park.
SOPRANOS (Bovs).
Carter, F.
Searle, S.
Westminster Abbey.
Harris, P. G.
Smith, T. V.
Adams, A. E.
Barnes, P. B.
Barnes, R. C.
Bourne, W. H.
Hallett, A. C.
Humphreys, D. W. G.
Jameson, J. C. A.
Marshallsay, W. C.
Kochester
Hoar, E. W.
Leech, L. A.
Cathedral.
Mitchell, C.
Robinson, T. H.
Burnham, A. E.
Garden, E. W.
Chanter, R. J. C.
Price, H. S.
Russ, S. H.
Sailer, J. E.
St Saviour s Collegiate Church, Southwark.
Hopgood, C. L. Xotman, J. G.
Collingwood, L. A.
Dawson, H. W.
Shearwood, A. L.
Stannard, R. J.
The Temple Church.
Fisher, R. J.
Williams, J. R.
Greenfield, J. A.
Stansfeld, R.
Gritten, H. A.
Windmill. A. S.
Hall, C. C. H.
Grizelle, H. F.
All Saints' Church, .\fargaret Street.
The Chapel Royal, St James's.
Grant, R. G.
Whitney, R. G. E.
Ackerman, A. E. Pinnington, A. H.
Higgins, J. B.
Ardley, E. L. Stone, N. M.
Everitt, W. H. Thacker. R. S. P.
St Andrew's Church, Wells Street.
Minter, T. C.
Viner, C. A.
Fisher, L.
Percival, C. K.
Osborne, W. E.
Wright, W. I.
Miller, W. J.
APPENDIX I
407
St Peters Church, Eaton Square.
Cozens, F. H.
James, Albert.
Arnott, W. K. Garrett, C. J.
Crews, Charles T. D.
Jones, F. Oswell.
Burdon, W. W. Powell, E. H. H.
Cunningham,
Kearton, J. Harper.
Charles, M. E. Steward, A. P.
Francis B.
Kearton, T. Wilfred.
Dalzell, Edward.
Kenningham, Alfred.
The London Training School for Choristers.
Dalzell. Tohn.
Large, J. P.
Bates, H. Phillips, P. J.
Davies,' Ben.
Leeds, Frederic.
Boughton. A. Slatter, S. S.
Davies, B.
Leyland, James.
Craven, L.
Davies, William.
Lloyd, Dr C. Harford.
Dear, James R.
Lord, W. Cluley.
Miss M. Bridge. Miss R. F. Bridge.
Dyson, Thomas.
Macpherson, Charles.
Ellison, Charles.
Masters, Samuel.
ALTOS.
Erskine, Rev. Charles.
Maunder, J. H.
Alcock, J. W. Knight, Henry F.
Balfour, H. L. Large, J.
Barnby, S. P. Larkin, F. G.
Belton. F. J. Marriner, G. F.
Everett, Rev. B. C. S.
Fearnlay, J. B.
Fell, J. William R.
Finlay, Col. Alexander.
McGuckin, Barton.
Monday, Joseph.
Norcup, F. W.
Oldroyd, T.
Bird, Henry R. Marriott, Ernest.
Bower, George E. Marshall, Frank D.
Fryer, A. Lawrence.
Galloway, W. John-
Owens, E. J. M.
Parry, S. H.
Brown, James A. May, George.
Brown, Leonard. Mayor, Spencer G.
Button, H. Elliot. 1 Morgan, Harry.
son, M.P.
Gawthrop, James.
Gibbs, H. Brandreth.
Pinches, J. H.
Pinnington, Alfred.
Sanderson, W. E.
Garden, H. Naylor, F.
Gill, Allen.
Saunders, Charles.
Coward, Percy O. Noble, Samuel.
Coward, Walter. Oakley, H. T.
Dancey, Harry. Peskett, Frank.
Davison, Munro. Potter, Edward D.
Gill, G. F.
Godfrey, Louis.
Greatorex, Rev. T.
Grover, Ager.
Saxe, Wyndham H.
Shakespeare.William.
Sheath, Charles.
Shirley, Arthur.
Dear Frank. Powell, Thomas.
Guy, Henry.
Sinclair, DrG. R.
Docker, F. A. W. Prendergast, A. H. D.
Dutton, Henry J. Read, Dr F. J.
Foster, John. Richardson, W. W.
Fraser, Haydn. Roberts, Dr J. Varley.
Frost, W. A. Rogers, W. H.
Goodban, L. Roper, E. Stanley.
Hall, Rev. E. Vine.
Harper, Francis Hill.
Hast, H. Gregory.
Henley, H. B.
Herring, Charles.
Hine-Haycock, Rev.
Squire, W. Barclay.
Stainer, Edward.
Stainer, J. F. R.
Stapley, E. James.
Starkey, Charles A.
Strong, Charles.
Griffiths, Harold. ; Sarjeant, J.
T. R.
Strong, David.
Grover, Havdn. Schartau, H. W.
Heney, R. W. | Smith, F. G.
Henry, Frank. Smith, S. F. Colley.
Hewitt, Harold. j Spear, J. J.
Hodges, A. Rolfe. Stilliard, J. H.
Hoare, E. B.
Holden, W. C.
Honeychurch, C. W.
Hunt, T.
Hunter, Albert
Stubbs, Harry.
Tahourdin, Rev. S. K.
Thompson, C. W.
Tower, Rev. Noel P.
Vincent, Dr Charles.
Hodgkins, E. E. Street, J. Edward.
Charles.
Walker, Fred.
Hoyte, W. Stevenson. Street, Oscar W.
Hunt, Rev. Dr H. G. 'Taylor, Ernest.
Huntley, Dr G. F.
Ince, Stanley B.
Waterman, Alfred A.
Wilde, Harold E.
Bonavia. Thomas, W. Henry.
Hunt, Hubert W. Tower, Bernard H.
BASSES.
Jeayes, Herbert. iVoysey, John.
Ackerman, Charles.
Bayley, Clowes.
Jolley, Dr Charles E. Wetton, H. Davan.
Adams, Thomas.
Bell, H. Owen.
King, Henry (Secre- Woods, F. Cunning-
Aikin-Sneath, Rev. D.
Bendall, R. S.
ffiry). ham.
Akerman, R. F.
Billin, R. W.
Martin.
Birbeck, W. J.
TENORS.
Andrews, George F.
Blackmore,Rev. R. C.
Aveling, Claude. | Burke, Harold.
Archdeacon, Albert.
Ely, Dr Arthur.
Beckett, Charles. Butler, J. J. Ernest.
Armes, Dr Phillip.
Bradford, W.
Bennetts, Vivian. Carpenter, Rev. H.W.
Bailey, Rev. John.
Breadmore, G. H.
Benson, Lionel. Clemens, Rev.
Baker, Henry J.
Brereton, W. H.
Besley, Rev. W. P. : Alfred R.
Baker, P. T.
Bridge, R. T.
Boyle, S. Malcolm. Cole, W. R.
Baker, Santley.
Bristowe, Alexander J.
Bragg, C. B. Coleman, C. W.
Banks, Rev. C. Pen-
Brooke, H. W.
Branscombe. Edward. ; Coleridge, Arthur
dock.
Buchanan, G. H.
Brierley, G. W. Duke.
Barker, C. Mylne.
Burgess, G. W.
Bryant, Edwin. \ Cooper, E. Ernest.
Barker, John. Carter, J. Hilton.
408
APPENDIX I
Chapman, Charles.
Hill, Arthur G.
Macnamara, Rev. H. Roberts, R. Edwin.
Cheadle, Rev. J. H.
Hilton, Robert.
D. Rootbam, C. B.
Conning, G. J. Hislop, Edward.
Manchester, J. W.
Ross, W. G.
Dale, C. J. Holliday, T. C.
Mann, DrA. H.
Rube, Charles.
Daniell-Bainbridge, \ Horner, Dr E. F.
Margetson, R. G.
Sawver. Dr Frank J .
Rev. H. G.
Hughes-Hughes, A.
Matthews, James.
Selfe, Claude R.
Deane, H. F.
Hulcup, H. J.
Maude, Gerald E.
Shepley, D. Sutton.
Williams.
Humphreys, David.
Miles, E. D.
Sheringham, Rev.
Dearth, Harry.
lies, J. Henry.
Miles, R. E.
H. A.
Dunstan, Dr Ralph.
Jamblin. Rev. Robert.
Mills, A. F.
Smart, Graham.
Fellowes, Rev. E. H.
Jekyll, C. S.
Mills, Bertram.
Smith, Stanley.
Flamank, S. W.
ohnson, Basil.
Mills, R. Watkin.
Stewart, Rev. C. H.
Ford, Ernest A. C.
ohnson, C. T.
Monday, J. Cyril.
Hylton.
Forington, W.
ohnson, M.
Monro, G.
Stubbs, George.
Foster, Myles Birket.
Gilbert, G. W.
ohnstone, G. Hope,
ordan, Dr C. War-
Nelson, B. W.
Nicholls, E. W.
Sweet, Henry.
Symes, Herbert W.
Gilbertson, Rev. Lewis.
wick.
Ogbourne, F. G. M.
Tapsfield, Rev. H. A.
Gill, George T. S. j Keates, J.
Oswald, Arthur L.
Taylor. Vernon.
Graham, John. j Keates, W. Allen.
Parratt, Geoffrey T. I Thompson, B. G.
Grahe, Otto G. ! Keeton. Dr Haydn.
Peace, Dr A. L.
Tinney, Charles E.
Gritten, Walter.
Hadlow, S. H.
Kempton, Thomas.
Kempton, W. Bell.
Percival, Rev. L. J.
Perkins, Rev. J. H. T.
Vinden, E. L.
Visetti, Albert.
Halkett, J. G. Hay.
King. J. H. Strick-
Philpott, Basil H. Waterman, T. H.
Hancock, Charles.
land.
Pownall, R. A. Watt, John.
Hardman, E. Trevor.
Knight, J. D.
Ranalow, F. B. Webster, H. W.
Harrison, Rev. Arthur.
Hawkins, A. J.
Langman, J.
Lord, Charles.
Reid, Donald H. West, John E.
Rivers, W. P. Whitehouse, J. F.
Hichens, A. K.
Luttman, W. L.
Robb, Thomas H. ' Whytehead, H. S.
Hildyard, Rev. L.
Hon. Spencer Lyttel-
Roberts, J. P.
Wicks, Thomas.
D'Arcy.
ton, C.B.
Slingsby.
Wilson, Leo.
No. 20. — THE NAVY.
LORDS COMMISSIONERS OF THE ADMIRALTY
AND ADMIRALTY STAFF.
Admiral Lord Walter Talbot Kerr, G.C.B.
Admiral Sir John Arbuthnot Fisher, G.C.B.
Rear-Admiral William Henry May, M.V.O.
Mrs May.
Rear-Admiral John Durnford, C.B., D.S.O.
Mrs Durnford.
Sir Evan Macgregor, K. C. B.
Lady Macgregor.
Rear-Admiral Angus Macleod.
Mrs Macleod.
Rear-Admiral W. H. Fawkes.
Mrs Fawkes.
Miss Fawkes.
Rear-Admiral Sir W. Wharton, K.C.B.,
F.R.S.
Lady Wharton.
Sir Henry Norbury, K.C.B.
Lady Norbury.
Sir John Durston, K.C.B.
Colonel E'. Raban, C.B.. R.E.
The Reverend Stuart Harris, M.A.
Mrs Harris.
Mr W. Graham Greene, C. B.
PRINCIPAL COMMANDS.
Admiral Lord Charles Scott, G.C.B.
The Lady Charles Scott.
Admiral Sir R. H. More Molyneux, G.C.B.
Vice- Admiral Sir F. Bedford, G.C.B.
Lady Bedford.
Vice -Admiral Sir Gerald Xoel, K.C B
K.C.M.G.
Lady Noel.
Vice-Admiral A. H. Markham.
Mrs Markham.
Rear-Admiral C. C. Drury
MINOR COMMANDS.
Vice-Admiral Sir T. Jackson, K.C.V.O.
Lady Jackson.
Rear-Admiral S. Holland.
Mrs Holland.
Rear-Admiral Pelham Aldrich.
Mrs Aldrich.
Rear-Admiral Sir W. Acland, Bart.
The Honourable Lady Acland.
Rear-Admiral G. L. Atkinson-Willes.
Mrs Atkinson-Willes.
APPENDIX I
409
Rear-Admiral The Honourable Assheton G.
Curzon-Howe, C.B., C.M.G.
The Honourable Mrs Curzon-Howe.
Commodore A. L. Winslos, C.V.O., C.M.G.
NAVAL AIDES-DE-CAMP TO THE KING.
Captain W. Des V. Hamilton.
Captain Francis C. B. Bridgeman.
Mrs Bridgeman.
Captain Sir Richard Poore, Bart.
Captain Alvin C. Corry.
Mrs Corry.
Captain Charles R. Arbuthnot.
Captain Walter H. B. Graham.
Mrs Graham.
Captain Randolph F. O. Foote, C.M.G.
Mrs Foote.
MARINE AIDES-DE-CAMP TO THE KING.
Colonel William Campbell.
Colonel Thomas D. Bridge.
Mrs Bridge.
NAVAL PHYSICIANS, ETC., TO THE KING.
Sir John Watt Reid, K.C.B., M.D., LL.D.
Lady Reid.
Sir James N. Dick, K.C.B.
Lady Dick.
Mr Adam Brunton Messer, M.D.
Mrs Messer.
Mr William H. Lloyd, M.D.
The Reverend John C. Cox Edwards, M.A.,
Honorary Chaplain to the King.
OTHER NAVAL OFFICERS.
Admiral Sir J. E. Erskine, K.C.B., A.D.C.
Lady Erskine.
Admiral Sir N. Bowden Smith, K.C.B.
Lady Bowden Smith.
Admiral Sir Algernon Heneage, G.C. B.
Lady Heneage.
Admiral A. A. C. Parr.
Mrs Parr.
Admiral The Honourable Sir Arthur Coch-
rane, K.C.B.
Admiral G. L. Sullivan.
Admiral E. S. Adeane, C.M.G.
Admiral Sir G. Digby Morant, K.C.B.
Admiral H. C. St John.
Vice-Admiral C. M. Buckle.
Vice-Admiral R. M. Lloyd, C.B.
Vice-Admiral J. W. Brackenbury, C.B.,
C.M.G. '
Vice-Admiral Sir George Nares, K.C.B.,
F.R.S.
Vice-Admiral J. Fellowes, C.B.
Rear -Admiral Charles D. Lucas, B.C.
Captain E. F. Inglefield.
Captain R. P. F. Purefoy, M.V.O.
Captain E. P. Jones, C.B.
Captain R. D. Gumming.
Captain John Denison.
Staff-Captain T. J. H. Rapson.
Staff-Captain W. S. Chambre".
Commander T. D. W. Napier.
Commander G. C. A. Marescaux.
Commander F. C. T. Tudor.
Commander S. R. Fremantle.
Commander C. C. Fowler.
Commander E. P. F. G. Grant.
Commander W. O. Boothby.
Lieutenant W. C. Chaytor.
Lieutenant Berkeley Holme-Sumner.
Lieutenant G. L. Saurin.
Lieutenant H. G. Jackson.
Lieutenant H. J. A. Throckmorton.
Lieutenant Manuel Dasent.
Lieutenant H. J. G. Good.
Lieutenant W. D. Irvin.
Lieutenant William L. W. Williams-Mason.
Lieutenant J. B. Hancock.
Lieutenant C. C. Walcott.
Lieutenant F. H. Mitchell.
Lieutenant E. V. F. R. Dugmore.
Lieutenant F. Powell.
Lieutenant G. D. Jephson.
Lieutenant G. C. Holloway, R.N.R.
Lieutenant W. C. Leader, R.N.R.
Chief Inspector of Machinery William Eames.
Chief Inspector of Machinery Henry Benbow,
D.S.O.
Chief Inspector of Machinery William Castle,
C.B.
Chief Inspector of Machinery James Roffey,
C.B.
Assistant-Engineer Charles de F. Messervy.
Inspector - General of Hospitals Thomas
Bolster.
Inspector-General of Hospitals R. W. Cop-
pinger, M.D.
Staff-Surgeon John Jenkins.
Surgeon G. M. Eastment.
Surgeon H. G. T. Major.
Paymaster-in-Chief Sir J. W. M. Ashby,
K.C.B.
Assistant- Pay master L. E. Tier.
Assistant-Paymaster H. W. E. Manisty.
Chaplain The Reverend J. H. Berry, M.A.
General Sir Henry Tuson, K.C.B., Royal
Marines.
Colonel A. D. Corbet, C.B., Royal Marines.
Colonel and Mrs W. T. Adair, do.
Colonel and Mrs R. P. Coffin, do.
Colonel and Mrs A. G. Chapman, do.
Lieutenant Guy Harrison, do.
Sir Nathaniel Barnaby, K.C.B.
Lady Barnaby.
4io
APPENDIX I
No. 21. — THE ARMY.
AIDES-DE-CAMP TO THE KING.
Colonel William Bell, C.B.
Colonel John Henry Rivett-Carnac, C.I.E.
Mrs Rivett-Carnac.
Colonel James Charles Cavendish.
Colonel Sir Reginald Howard Alexander
Ogilvie, Bart.
Colonel Gordon Lorn Campbell Money, C. B. ,
D.S.O.
Mrs Money.
Colonel Sir Francis Howard, K.C.B., C.M.G.
Lady Howard.
Colonel The Earl of March.
Colonel James Stevenson.
Mrs Stevenson.
Colonel Francis James Kempster, D.S.O.
Colonel Charles Comyn Egerton, C B .
D.S.O.
Colonel Ralph Arthur Penrhyn Clements,
D.S.O.
Colonel William Gregory Wood-Martin.
Mrs Martin.
Colonel Charles Brome Bashford.
Mrs Bashford.
Colonel Charles Philip le Cornu, C.B.
Mrs le Cornu.
Colonel William Aitken, C.B.
Mrs Aitken.
Colonel Sir Francis Wingate, K.C.B.,
K.C.M.G., D.S.O.
Lady Wingate.
Colonel Henry Grey Dixon, C.B.
Mrs H. G. Dixon.
Colonel Henry Harding Mathias, C.B.
Mrs Mathias.
Colonel Robert Hunter Murray, C.B.,
C.M.G.
Mrs Murray.
Colonel Harry Cooper, C.M.G.
Mrs Cooper.
Colonel Sir Hector Archibald MacDonald,
K.C.B., D.S.O.
Colonel David Francis Lewis, C.B.
Colonel Sir Henry Edward McCallum,
K. C.M.G.
Colonel Richard Charles Graham Mayne,
C.B.
Colonel Robert George Broad wocd, C.B.
Colonel Lewis Anstruther Hope, C.B.
Mrs Hope.
Colonel Herbert Charles Onslow Plumer,
C.B.
Mrs Plumer.
Colonel Edwin Alfred Hervey Alderson, C.B.
Mrs E. A. H. Alderson.
Colonel James Spens, C.B.
Mrs James Spens.
Colonel Henry Merrick Lawson.
Colonel Thomas David Pilcher.
Mrs Pilcher.
Colonel Cecil William Park.
Mrs Park.
Colonel Henry Vivian Cowan.
Mrs Cowan.
Colonel William Pitcairn Campbell.
Mrs Campbell.
Colonel The Honourable Henry George
Louis Crichton.
The Lady Emma Crichton.
Colonel Sir Charles Edward Howard Vincent.
K.C.M.G., C.B.
Lady Vincent.
Colonel Robert Bellew Adams, B.C., C.B.
Colonel Hubert Ian Wetherall Hamilton,
D.S.O.
Colonel Lord Algernon Malcolm Arthur
Percy.
Lieutenant-Colonel Sir Hector Munro, Bart.
Colonel Ernest Villiers.
Colonel Charles Fyshe Roberts, C.M.G.
(New South Wales Local Forces).
HONORARY PHYSICIANS TO THE KING.
Surgeon-Major-General James Sinclair, M.D.
Surgeon -General Sir John A. Woolfryes,
M.D.. K.C.B., C.M.G.
Lady Woolfryes.
INDIAN MILITARY FORCES.
Surgeon-General Sir Joseph Fayrer, Bart..
M.D., K.C.S.I.
Lady Fayrer.
Deputy-Surgeon-General Thomas Edmond-
stone Charles, M.D.
Mrs Edmondstone Charles.
HONORARY SURGEONS TO THE KING.
Surgeon-General Sir John Harry Ker Innes,
K.C.B.
Surgeon-Major-General John By Cole Reade,
C.B.
Mrs Reade.
INDIAN MILITARY FORCES.
Surgeon-General James Macnabb Cuning-
ham, M.D., C.S.I.
Mrs Cuningham.
Surgeon-General George Bidie, M.B., C.I.E.
Mrs Bidie.
HONORARY CHAPLAIN TO THE KING.
The Reverend J. C. Edghill. D.D.
APPENDIX I
411
HEAD-QUARTERS STAFF OF THE ARMY.
Field-Marshal The Right Honourable The
Earl Roberts, K.G., K.P., G.C.B.,
G.C.S.I. , G.C.I. E., B.C., Commander-in-
Chief.
Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Streatfeild, Private
Secretary to the Commander-in-Chief.
AIDES-DE-CAMP TO THE COMMANDER-IN-
CHIEF : —
Lieutenant-Colonel Edmund John Phipps-
Hornby, ?).£.
Mrs Phipps-Hornby.
Captain The Honourable Hugh Dawnay,
D.S.O.
The Lady Susan Dawnay.
Captain The Lord Charles George Francis
Major William Maxwell Sherston, D.S.O.
Mrs Sherston.
Major The Honourable George Joachim
Goschen.
The Lady Evelyn Goschen.
Lieutenant-General Lord William Frederick
Ernest Seymour, Military Secretary.
The Lady William Seymour.
Colonel William Edmund Franklyn, C.B.,
Assistant Military Secretary.
Mrs Franklyn.
Colonel Alexander Mann Delavoye, Assistant
Military Secretary for Education.
Mrs Delavoye.
Colonel Henry Doveton Hutchinson , Assistant
Military Secretary (for Indian Affairs).
Lieutenant-General Sir William Nicholson,
K.C.B., Director-General of Military
Intelligence and Mobilisation.
Lady Nicholson.
Colonel Percy Henry Noel Lake, Assistant
Quarterm aster-General.
Mrs Lake.
Colonel James Keith Trotter, C.B., C.M.G.,
Assistant Quartermaster-General.
Lieutenant-Colonel Edward Altham Altham,
C.M.G., Assistant Quartermaster-
General.
Mrs Altham.
Lieutenant-Colonel William Robert Robert-
son, D.S.O., Assistant Quartermaster-
General.
Mrs Robertson.
Colonel Arthur Clifton Hansard, Deputy-
Assistant Quartermaster-General.
Mrs Hansard.
Lieutenant-General Sir Thomas Kelly Kenny,
K.C. B., Adjutant-General to the Forces.
Major-General Arthur Singleton Wynne,
C.B., Deputy Adjutant-General to the
Forces.
Mrs Wynne.
Colonel Edward Owen Hay, Assistant
Adjutant-General.
Colonel Frederick William Benson, C.B.,
Assistant Adjutant-General.
Mrs Benson.
Colonel Frederick Spencer Robb, Assistant
Adjutant-General.
Mrs Frederick Robb.
Colonel John Spence, Assistant Adjutant-
General.
Mrs Spence.
Major Walter Adye, Deputy-Assistant
Adjutant-General.
Mrs Adye.
Major "Lionel Arthur Montagu Stopford,
Deputy-Assistant Adjutant-General.
Mrs Stopford.
Lieutenant-Colonel Edward John Granet,
Deputy-Assistant Adjutant-General.
Mrs Granet.
Major-General Sir Alfred Edward Turner,
K.C.B., Inspector-General of Auxiliary
Forces.
Major-General Herbert Charles Borrett,
Inspector-General of Recruiting.
Mrs Borrett.
Captain Conwyn Mansell-Jones, I.e.,
Deputy-Assistant Adjutant-General for
Recruiting.
Colonel Ronald Charles Maxwell, C.B.,
Assistant Adjutant - General, Royal
Engineers.
Major Frank Ridley Farrer, Deputy-Assistant
Adjutant-General, Royal Engineers.
Major-General Frederick George Slade, C. B. ,
Inspector - General, Royal Garrison
Artillery.
Mrs Slade.
Colonel Douglas Forde Douglas-Jones,
Director of Army Schools.
Mrs Douglas-Jones.
Colonel George Francis Robert Henderson,
C.B.
Mrs Henderson.
Major-General Henry Fane Grant, C.B. ,
Inspector-General of Cavalry.
Mrs Grant.
Colonel Robert Auld, C.B., Deputy Quarter-
master-General.
Mrs Auld.
Colonel Walter Alphonsus Dunne, C.B.,
Assistant Quartermaster-General.
Mrs Dunne.
Colonel Charles Edward Beckett, C.B.,
Assistant Quartermaster-General.
Colonel Charles Ernest Heath, Assistant
Quart erm aster-General.
Mrs Heath.
Colonel Frederick Thomas Clayton, C.B.,
Assistant Quartermaster-General,
Mrs Clayton.
4I2
APPENDIX I
Lieutenant-Colonel John Steven Cowans,
Deputy- A ssistant Quartermaster-General.
Mrs Cowans.
Major Evan Eyare Carter, C.M.G., Deputy-
Assistant Quartermaster-General.
Mrs Carter.
Major-General William Robinson Truman,
Inspector-General of Remounts.
Mrs Truman.
Colonel James Edward Kitson, Chief Pay-
master.
Mrs Kitson.
Veterinary-Colonel Francis Duck, F. R. C.V. S. ,
C.B., Director-General Army Veterinary
Department.
Veterinary-Lieutenant-Colonel Joshua Arthur
Nunn, F.R.C.V.S., C.I.E., D.S.O.,
Deputy Director-General Army Veter-
inary Department.
General Sir Richard Harrison, K.C.B.,
C.M.G., Inspector-General of Fortifi-
cations.
Lady Harrison.
Colonel Charles Hervey Bagot, C.B., Deputy
Inspector-General of Fortifications.
Mrs Bagot.
Colonel Noel Montagu Lake, Deputy
Inspector-General of Fortifications.
Mrs Lake.
Colonel Richard Matthews Ruck, Deputy
Inspector-General of Fortifications.
Mrs Ruck.
Colonel Charles Henry Darling, Assistant
Inspector-General of Fortifications.
Mrs Darling.
Colonel Robert Arthur Montgomery, C.B.,
Deputy Director-General of Ordnance.
Mrs Montgomery.
Surgeon-General Sir William Taylor, M.D.,
C.B., K.H.P., Director-General Army
Medical Service.
Lady Taylor.
Surgeon-General Alfred Keogh, M.D., C.B..
Deputy Director- General Army Medical
Service.
Mrs Alfred Keogh.
The Right Reverend Bishop John Taylor
Smith, D. D. , Chaplain-General.
OTHER OFFICERS ON THE ACTIVE LIST.
General Edward Francis Chapman, C.B.
Mrs Chapman.
General Nathaniel Stevenson.
General Cuthbert Collingwood Suther.
General Sir George Corrie Bird, K.C.I.E.,
C.B.
Lady Bird.
General Sir William Stirling, K.C.B., Lieu-
tenant of the Tower.
Lady Stirling.
Lieutenant-General Sir Charles Warren,
G.C.M.G., K.C.B.
Lady Warren.
Lieutenant-General John Fletcher Owen.C. B. ,
President Ordnance Committee.
Lieutenant-General Sir Archibald Hunter,
K.C.B., D.S.O., Commanding Scottish
District.
Lieutenant-General Sir William Francis
Butler, K.C.B., Commanding Western
District.
Lady Butler.
Lieutenant-General Sir Charles Tucker,
K.C.B.
Lady Tucker.
Major-General Reginald Thomas Thynne,
K.C.B., Commanding North-Eastern
District.
Mrs Thynne.
Major-General Sir Henry Trotter, K.C.V.O.,
Commanding Home District.
Lady Trotter.
Major-General Charles John Burnett, C.B.
Mrs Burnett.
Major-General Sir John Frederick Maurice,
K.C.B.,Commanding Woolwich District.
Lady Maurice.
Major-General Sir Hugh M'Calmont, K.C. B.,
Commanding Cork District.
The Honourable Lady M'Calmont.
Major-General Sir Henry Macleod Leslie
Rundle, K.C.B., KlC.M.G., D.S.O.,
Commanding South-Eastern District.
Lady Rundle.
Major-General Montague Protheroe, C.B.,
C.S.I.
Major-General George Salis Schwabe.
Mrs Salis Schwabe.
Major-General Edward Pemberton Leach,
C.B., B.C., Commanding gth Division,
3rd Army Corps.
Mrs Leach.
Major-General Sir John Charles Ardagh.
K.C. I.E., C.B.
Lady Ardagh (Susan, Countess of Malmes-
bury).
Major-General Sir Thomas Eraser, K.C.B.,
C.M.G. , Commanding Thames District.
Lady Fraser.
Major-General Barrington Bulkley Douglas
Campbell, C.V.O., C.B.
Mrs Campbell.
Major-General William Salmond, C.B.
Mrs Salmond.
Major-General Sir Gerald de Courcy Morton,
K.C. I.E., C.B., Commanding Dublin
District.
Lady Morton.
Major-General Sir William Forbes Gatacre,
K.C.B., D.S.O.
Lady Gatacre.
APPENDIX I
413
Major - General Geoffrey Barton, C.B.,
C.M.G.
Mrs Barton.
Major-General Donald James Sim M'Leod,
C.B., D.S.O.
Mrs M'Leod.
Lieutenam-General Sir Henry John Thoroton
Hildyard, K.C.B., Commanding ist
Army Corps.
Lady Hildyard.
Major-General Henry Hallam Parr, C.B.,
C.M.G.
Mrs Hallam Parr.
Lieutenant-General Sir John French, K.C. B.
Lady French.
Lieutenant-Geneial Sir Ian Standish Mon-
teith Hamilton, K.C.B., D.S.O.
Lady Hamilton.
Major-General Mildmay Willson Willson,
C.B.
Major-General Sir Bruce Meade Hamilton,
K.C.B.
Major-General William Henry Mackinnon,
C.B.
Mrs Mackinnon.
Surgeon-General George Joseph Hamilton
Evatt, M.D., Principal Medical Officer,
2nd Army Corps.
Colonel Sir John Steevens, K.C.B.
Lady Steevens.
Major-General Sir Reginald Clare Hart,
O.C., K.C.B.
Lady Hart.
Major-General Sir George Henry Marshall,
K.C.B., Commanding Royal Artillery,
ist Army Corps.
Lady Marshall.
Brigadier - General The Honourable Sir
Frederick William Stopford, K.C.M.G.,
C.B., Chief Staff Officer, ist Army Corps.
Colonel Rowland Hill Martin, C.B., C.M.G.
Mrs Martin.
Colonel Sir Charles Henry Leslie, Bart., C.B.
Lady Leslie.
Colonel Sir Wodehouse Dillon Richardson,
K.C.B., A.A.G. Western District.
Lady Richardson.
Lady Macdonald Lockhart.
Major-General Sir Edward Locke Elliot,
K.C.B., D.S.O.
Lady Locke Elliot.
Major-General Sir William George Knox,
K.C.B.
Lady Knox.
Colonel Sir John Grenfell Maxwell, K.C.B.,
C.M.G., D.S.O.
Lady Maxwell.
Colonel John Eccles Nixon, A.Q.G. in India.
Mrs Xixon.
Colonel Charles Duncan Cooper, C.B.
Colonel Robert George Kekewich, C.B.
Colonel Edward Owen Fisher Hamilton, C.B.
Mrs Hamilton.
Colonel The Honourable Julian Hedworth
George Byng, M.V.O.
The Honourable Mrs Byng.
Colonel Sir Henry Seymour Rawlinson, Bart.,
C.B.
Lady Rawlinson.
Colonel Michael Frederic Rimington, C.B.
Mrs Rimington.
Lieutenant-Colonel Eyre Macdonnell Stewart
Crabbe, C.B.
Mrs Crabbe.
Major Raymond John Marker, D.S.O.
Lieutenant-General Sir Edwin Markham,
K.C.B., Governor R.M.C.
Lady Markham.
Major-General Richard Henry Jelf, Governor
R.M.A.
Mrs Jelf.
Colonel Edmund Bainbridge, C.B., Chief
Superintendent Ordnance Factories.
Mrs Bainbridge.
OFFICERS OF THE UNEMPLOYED, SUPER-
NUMERARY AND RETIRED LISTS.
General George Nicholas Channer, C.B.,
«.€.
General Frederick Caspar Le Grand,
R. M.L.I.
General Sir Samuel James Graham, K.C.B.,
R.M.L.I.
Lady Graham.
General Sir George Digby Barker, K.C.B.
Major-General Sir Cornelius Francis Clery,
K.C.B., K. C.M.G.
Major-General Sir Coleridge Grove, K.C.B.
Major-General Sir Henry Edward Colvile,
K. C.M.G., C.B.
Lady Colvile.
Major-General John Palmer Brabazon,
C.V.O., C.B.
Major-General John Baillie Ballantyne Dick-
son, C.B., C.M.G.
Mrs Dickson.
No. 22. — THE CIVIL SERVICE (ENGLISH).
TRFA<;ITCV Sir Edward Hamilton, K.C.B. Mr E. G. Harman.
Mr Stephen Edward Spring Mr J. S. Bradbury.
Sir Francis Mowatt, G.C.B. Rice, C.B. Mr G. L. Barstow.
Miss Mowatt. Mrs Spring Rice. Mr M. F. Headlam.
414
APPENDIX I
HOME OFFICE.
Mr R. L. Antrobus, C.B.
Mr Charles Perrin.
Sir Kenelm Edward Digby
Mrs Antrobus.
Mrs Perrin.
K.C.B.
Sir W. Baillie-Hamilton,
Mr F. H. Tulloch.
The Honourable Lady Digby.
Mr Henry Cunynghame, C.B.
Mrs Cunynghame.
K.C.M.G., C.B.
Lady Baiilie-Hamilton.
Mrs Tulloch.
CROWN OFFICE.
Mr Charles S. Murdoch, C.B.
WAR OFFICE.
Sir Kenneth Augustus Muir
Mrs Murdoch.
Colonel Sir Edward Willis
Mackenzie, K.C.B., K.C.
Mr J. A. Longley.
Duncan Ward, K.C.B.
Miss Muir Mackenzie.
The Lady Louisa Longley.
Captain M. B. Lloyd, R.A.
Mrs Lloyd.
Lady Ward.
Sir Guy Douglas Fleetwood
Wilson, C.B.
PRIVY COUNCIL OFFICE.
Mr Almeric WT. FitzRov.
Dr T. M. Legge, M.D.
Mr Frank Thomas Marzials,
Mrs FitzRoy.
C.B.
Mr James H. Harrison.
FOREIGN OFFICE.
Mrs Marzials.
Mr EdwardS. Hope, C.B.
Sir Thomas • Sanderson,
Mrs Hope.
G.C.B.
Miss Sanderson.
The Honourable Sir Francis
ADMIRALTY.
Mr H. J. Vansittart Neale, C. B.
Mrs Vansittart Neale.
BOARD OF TRADE.
Sir Francis Hopwood, K.C.B.,
C.M.G.
The Honourable Francis H.
Villiers, C.B.
MrR. D. Awdry, C.B.
Mrs Awdry.
Lady Hopwood.
Colonel Sir Herbert Jekyll,
The Honourable Mrs Villiers.
Sir Martin Gosselin,
K.C.M.G., C.B.
Mr Philip Watts.
Mrs Watts.
Mr Gordon William Miller.
R.E., K.C.M.G.
Lady Jekyll.
Mr Walter J. Howell.
The Honourable Lady
Mrs Miller.
Mr Henry Yorke, C.B.
Mr R. Ellis Cunliffe.
Mrs Cunliffe.
Sir Clement 'Hill, K.C.M.G.,
C B
The Lady Lilian Yorke.
Mr W. H. M. Christie, C.B.,
RECORD OFFICE.
Mr Arthur Larcom.
Mrs Larcom.
Mr H. Farnall, C.M.G.
Mr C. J. B. Hurst.
F.R.S.
Mr John Hardinge Giffard.
Sir James Williamson.
Lady Williamson.
Mr David Evans.
Sir Henry Churchill Maxwell
Lyte, K.C.B.
Lady Maxwell Lyte.
BOARD OF AGRICULTURE.
INDIA OFFICE.
Mrs Evans.
Mr Thomas Henry Elliot, C. B.
Sir Arthur Godley, K.C.B.
The Honourable Lady
Mr J. A. Strong.
Mrs Strong.
Mrs Elliot.
Major P. G. Craigie.
Godley.
Mr W. Graham Greene, C. B.
WOODS AND FORESTS.
Sir Horace Walpole, K.C.B.
Lady Walpole.
Mr Henry J. Oram, R.N.
Captain George E. Patey,
Mr Edward Stafford Howard,
C.B.
Mr Richmond Ritchie, C.B.
Mr E. G. Bowls.
Mrs Bosvls.
R.N.
Mrs Patey.
Rear -Admiral Sidney M.
The Lady Rachel Howard.
Mr John Francis Fortescue
orner.
Mr A. G. Scott.
Eardley Wilmot.
Mrs Scott.
Mrs Eardley Wilmot.
A
Mr F. Whitmore Smith,
Captain E. Inglefield, R.N.
WORKS AND PUBLIC
C.I.E.
Mrs Inglefield.
BUILDINGS.
Captain Charles G. Dicken,
The Viscount Esher,
COLONIAL OFFICE.
R.N.
K.C.V.O., C.B. (Secre-
Sir Montagu Frederick
Mrs Dicken.
tary).
Ommanney, K.C.B.,
K.C.M.G.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOARD.
Sir John Taylor, K.C.B.
Lady Taylor.
Lady Ommanney.
Sir Samuel Butler Provis,
Mr H. Tanner.
Mr Frederick Graham, C.B.
K.C.B.
Mr John B. Westcott.
Miss E. D. Suft.
MrW. E. Knollys, C.B
Mrs Westcott.
Mr Charles P. Lucas, C.B.
Mrs Knollys.
Mr A. Y. Nutt.
Miss A. Lucas.
Colonel J. T. Marsh, R.E.
Mrs Nutt.
Mr Hugh Bertram Cox.
Mrs Marsh.
Mr Rowland Bailey.1
Mrs Cox.
Mr A. H. Downes, M.D.
Mrs Bailey.
1 Mr R. Bailey was one of the chief officials of the Office of Works who carried out
the excellent structural arrangements within the Abbey at the Coronation.
APPENDIX I
Mr J. H. Hillier.
Mr J. W. Alcock.
Mrs Alcock.
Mr Stanley Quick.
Mr Burt (Contractor inside
the Abbey).
Mrs Burt.
BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Sir G. William Kekewich,
K.C.B.
Lady Kekewich.
Sir W. de W. Abney, K.C.B.
Lady Abney.
Mr J. White.
Mr H. M. Lindsell.
CUSTOMS.
Ryder,
Sir George Lisle
K.C.B
Lady Ryder.
Mr John Arrow Kempe, C.B.
Mrs Kempe.
INLAND REVENUE.
Sir Henry William Primrose,
K.C.B., C.S.I.
Lady Primrose.
SirF. L. Robinson, K.C.B.
Mr Laurance N. Guillemard.
Mrs Guillemard.
POST OFFICE.
Sir George Herbert Murray.
K.C.B.
The Hon. Lady Murray.
MrJ. C. Lamb,C.B.,C.M.G.
Mrs Lamb.
Sir Robert Hunter.
Lady Hunter.
Mr S. Raffles Thompson.
SCOTTISH OFFICE.
Colonel Sir Colin Scott-Mon-
crieff, K.C.M.G., C.S.I.
Lady Scott-Moncrieff.
Mr G. A. J. Lee.
SCOTTISH EDUCATION
OFFICE.
Sir Henry Craik, K.C.B.
Lady Craik.
Mr George Todd.
Mrs Todd.
Major Atkin.
LUNACY COMMISSIONERS.
Mr Frederick Needham, M.D.
Mrs Needham.
PRISON DEPARTMENT.
Sir E. J. Ruggles-Brise,
K.C.B.
STATIONERY OFFICE.
Mr T. Digby Pigott, C.B.
Mrs Pigott.
BRITISH MUSEUM.
Sir Edward Maunde Thomp-
son, K.C.B.
Lady Maunde Thompson.
CIVIL SERVICE COM-
MISSIONERS.
Mr W. J. Courthope, C.B.
Mrs Courthope.
The Lord Francis Hervey.
GENERAL REGISTRY OFFICE.
Mr Reginald Macleod, C. B.
The Lady Agnes Macleod.
NATIONAL DEBT OFFICE.
Mr George W. Hervey, C.B.
Mrs Hervey.
ECCLESIASTICAL COM-
MISSIONERS.
Mr Alfred de Bock Porter,
C.B.
Mrs Porter.
EXCHEQUER AND AUDIT
DEPARTMENT.
Mr Douglas Close Richmond.
Mrs Richmond.
Mr Francis Phillips.
METROPOLITAN POLICE.
Mr Alexander Carmichael
Bruce.
Mrs Carmichael Bruce.
Miss Bruce.
Sir Charles Howard.
Lady Howard.
Mrs Robert Pitman.
Mr Edward Richard Henry.
Mrs Henry.
Mr A. R. Pennefather, C.B.
Mr George H. Edwards.
Mrs George H. Edwards.
SUEZ CANAL.
The Honourable Sir Charles
W. Fremantle, K.C.B.
The Honourable Lady Fre-
mantle.
BANK OF ENGLAND.
Mr Augustus Prevost
(Governor of the Bank
of England).
Mr S. Hope Morley (Deputy
Governor of the Bank of
England).
Mrs Morley.
DUCHY OF LANCASTER.
Mr W. R. Smith.
SCOTTISH CIVIL SERVICE.
Mr J. Patten MacDougall.
Mrs Patten MacDougall.
Lieutenant-Colonel McHardy,
C.B.
Mrs McHardy.
Mr R. M. McKerrell.
Mrs McKerrell.
Sir Stair Agnew, K.C.B.
Mr J. Hope Finlay.
Captain Monro.
Mrs Monro.
Mr E. P. W. Redford.
Mrs Redford.
IRISH CIVIL SERVICE.
Mr George C. V. Holmes.
Mrs Holmes.
Colonel Neville Chamberlain,
C.B.
Mrs Chamberlain.
Mr William J. M. Starkie,
Litt.D.
Mrs Starkie.
Mr J. B. Dougherty, C.B.
Mrs Dougherty.
Sir Patrick Coll, C.B.
Lady Coll.
Mr John George Barton. C.B.
Mr James S. Gibbons, C.B.
Sir George Plunkett O'Farrell,
M.D.
Lady Plunkett O'Farrell.
Mr JohnFagan, F.R.C.S.I.
Mr Fane Vernon.
Sir Walter Armstrong.
Lady Armstrong.
Mr Richard Manders.
Miss Richard Manders.
Mr P. Hanson.
416
APPENDIX I
No. 23. — PARLIAMENTARY OFFICIALS.
i. HOUSE OF LORDS. Mr Victor M. Biddulph.
Mr H. J. F. Badeley.
Mr Henry J. L. Graham,
C.B. (Clerk of Parlia-
Mr A. H. M. Butler.
Mrs Butler.
ments).
Mr R. C. Norman (Private
The Lady Margaret Graham.
Secretary to Lord Chan-
The Honourable Edward P.
cellor).
Thesiger, C.B. (Deputy
Clerk of Parliaments).
Captain T. D. Butler (Yeoman
Usher of the Black Rod).
The Honourable Mrs E.
Mrs Butler.
Thesiger.
Miss Butler.
Mr Edward H. Alderson.
Mr Cuthbert Headlam.
Mr Robert W. Monro.
Mr E. C. Vigors.
Mrs R. W. Monro.
Mr A. B. S. Tennyson.
Miss K. T. Munro.
Mr Albert Gray.
2. HOUSE OF COMMONS.
Mrs Albert Gray.
Sir Courtenay Ilbert, K. C. S. I. ,
Mr S. Arthur Strong.
C.I.E. (Clerk of the
Mrs S. Arthur Strong.
House).
Mr Alfred Harrison.
Lady Ilbert.
Mrs Alfred Harrison.
Mr A. W. Nicholson (Clerk
Mr J. F. Symons-Jeune.
Assistant).
Mrs Symons-Jeune.
Miss Nicholson.
Mr Fe'lix J. H. Skene.
Mr Webster (Second Clerk
Mrs Skene.
Assistant).
Mr Hugh Hamilton Gordon.
Mrs H. H. Gordon.
Miss Webster.
Mr William Gibbons.
Mr Cecil Lloyd Anstruther.
Mrs William Gibbons.
The Honourable Alexander
Mr William H. Ley.
McDonnell.
Mrs William Ley.
Mr Arthur H. Robinson.
Mr J. H. W. Somerset.
Mrs Robinson.
Mrs J. Somerset.
Mr Henry P. St John.
Mr R. Dickinson.
Mrs St John.
Mrs Dickinson.
Mr F. St George Tuppei .
Mrs F. St George Tapper.
Mr Turner.
Mrs Turner.
Mr Frere.
Miss Frere.
Mr L. T. Le Marchant.
Mrs L. T. Le Marchant.
Mr G. C. Giffard.
Mrs G. C. Giffard.
Sir Everard H. Doyle, Bart.
Mr Charles W. Campion.
Mrs Campion.
Mr R. C. Walpole.
Miss Walpole.
Mr Bonham-Carter.
Miss Bonham-Carter.
Mr Harry D. Erskine.
The Lady Horatia Erskine.
Mr Francis Gosset.
Mrs Francis Gosset.
Mrs Basil Wilberforce.
Miss Violet Wilberforce.
The Honourable Sir E.
Chandos- Leigh, K.C.B.
The Honourable Lady
Chandos- Leigh.
Mr M. Killick.
Miss Killick.
Mr Walter Erskine.
Miss Erskine.
Mr Edward Gully.
Mrs Edward Gully.
No. 24. — INVITED BY His MAJESTY'S SPECIAL COMMAND.
Mr Edwin Austin Abbey, R.A. (His Majesty's
Special Painter to the Coronation).
Mr John Edward Courtenay Bodley (His
Majesty's Special Historian of the
Coronation).
No. 25. — EARL MARSHAL'S DEPARTMENT, ETC.
EARL MARSHAL.
The Duke of Norfolk, K.G.
i. HERALDS' COLLEGE
OR COLLEGE OF ARMS.
KINGS OF ARMS.
Sir Albert Woods, K.C.B.,
K.C.M.G. (Garter).
Lady Wood.
Mr G. E. Cokayne (Claren-
ceux).
Mrs G. Cokayne.
Mr W. H. Weldon (Norroy).
HERALDS.
Mr H. Murray Lane (Chester).
Mr Edward Bellasis (Lan-
caster).
Mr A. Scott Gatty (York).
Mrs A. Scott Gatty.
Mr H. Farnham Burke
(Somerset).
Mrs H. Farnham Burke.
Mr Charles H. Athill (Rich-
mond).
Mr W. A. Lindsay, K.C.
(Windsor).
The Lady Harriet Lindsay.
PURSUIVANTS.
Mr G. M. Marshall, LL.D.
(Rouge Croix).
Mr G. Ambrose Lee (Blue-
mantle).
Mrs G. Ambrose Lee.
Mr Everard Green (Rouge
Dragon).
Mr T. M. Joseph Watkin
(Portcullis).
Mrs T. M. Joseph Watkin.
Mr Charles Buckler (Surrey
Herald Extraordinary).
APPENDIX I 417
Mr Gerald Woods Wollaston Mr F. G. Bromhead. Captain C. V. C. Hobart,
( Fitzalan Pursuivant Mr A. F. Burke. D.S.O., Grenadier
Extraordinary). Major L. Butler-Bowdon. Guards.
Mr H. Wilberforce. The Honourable Edward Major Bernard Hodgson.
Mrs H. Wilberforce. Cadogan. Mr Herbert Hope.
The Honourable Geofrey Mr St John Hope.
2. Appointed specially for the Cadogan. Lieutenant Charles Howard,
purposes of the Coronation Mr W. Campion. King's Royal Rifle Corps.
of Their Majesties King Mr Charles Cave. Mr Esm6 Howard.
Edward VII. and Queen Mr A. Chavasse. Mr R. A. Hudson.
Alexandra. Alderman Clegg. Mr Thomas James.
\xr o tr H K rt r R Mr A. W. T. Cochrane. Mr C. R. Johnson.
/«!„?' ,rtoDart> 0>B- Lieutenant - Colonel Arthur Sir Coleridge Kennard, Bart.
(sec :tary) Collins, C.B., M.V.O. Mr Philip Kerr.
The Honourable Mrs Hobart. Tfa Honourable George Mr John Kerr.
Miss Irene Hobart Colville > Captain Earl of Kerry, D.S.O.,
Mr Leonard C Lmdsay, Mr w. Ward Cook. F Grenadier Guards.
*•»£; V™?™? ^cretary Mr victor Cockran Mr Francis Lane-Fox.
Mrs Leonard' L ndS *' Mr S" CowPer Coles' Mr M' Gerald Lane'
Captain Walter C. Davenport. Mr Francis Langdale.
^/~>T T-> c-T'ATrTT' Mr Henry de Colyar. Captain Philip Langdale.
3- GOLD STAFF ^ «^g d<, ^ ^Q Lavie.
Captain M. Earle, D.S.O., General Law.
Lieutenant - Colonel Lord Grenadier Guards. Major Leatham.
Edmund B. Talbot, M. P., Captain Gerald Ellis, Rifle Major Charles Leslie.
D.S.O. (in Command). Brigade. Captain C. L. Lindsay, late
Major-General Sir Reginald Mr Henry Englehart. Grenadier Guards.
Pole - Carew, K.C.B., Mr Algernon Evan-Thomas. Mr David Lindsay.
C.V.O. (in command of Mr Edmund Evan-Thomas. Captain H. Lindsay, late
Gold Staff Officers for Mr Alan David Erskine. Gordon Highlanders.
Procession). The Honourable Everard Mr Leonard C. Lindsay.
Mr Victor A. Williamson, Feilding. The Honourable Reginald
C.M.G. (second in Com- Lieutenant - Colonel Francis Lister.
mand). Fitzherbert. Mr Ernest Little.
Mr F. Anderton. Mr Alan Fletcher. Mr C. P. Little.
Sir Windham R. C. An- Alderman G. Franklin. Mr Venables Llewellyn.
struther, Bart. Mr Julian Gaisford. Captain A. H. O. Lloyd,
Sir George Arthur, Bart. Major Hubert Gallon. M.V.O., late Grenadier
Mr Bertram Frankland Frank- Mr Hamillon Gatliff. Guards.
land-Russell-Astley. Mr E. H. George. Mr Francis Stanley Lowe.
Mr Crosier Bailey. Captain Sir John Gladstone, Mr Thomas Penrose Lyons.
Captain Sir F. Bathurst, Bart., Bart., late Coldstream Mr H. W. W. McAnally.
Grenadier Guards. Guards. Lieutenanl R. McCalmont,
Mr W. Dalglish Bellasis. • Mr Hubert Greenwood. Irish Guards.
Sir Henry Bellingham, Barl. Mr H. Groves. Caplain McEwen.
Mr F. Cavendish Bentinck. Mr L. V. Harcourt. Mr J. R. Maguire.
Mr Wulstan Berkeley. Mr H. Percy Harris. Mr George Manners.
Mr Clive Bigham, C.M.G. Major Harrison. Mr R. G. March.
The Honourable Maurice The Honourable Gilbert Major R. J. Marker, D.S.O.,
Brett, Coldstream Guards. Hastings-Campbell. Coldstream Guards.
The Honourable Oliver Brett. Captain G. Heneage, Grena- Mr C. C. Marrable.
Colonel The Honourable dier Guards. Mr John Marshall.
Francis Bridgeman. Colonel G. Henderson. Mr George Marshall.
Mr W. Fitzherbert Brock- Lieutenant-Colonel Henty. Brevet-Major F. B. Maurice.
holes. Mr H. L. Hertslet, M.V.O. The Honourable Bernard
The Honourable Arthur Mr M. H. Hicks-Beach. Maxwell.
Brodrick. Mr Cecil Higgins. Captain W. Maxwell-Scott.
1 The "Gold Staff Officers" were the persons appointed by the Earl Marshal to con-
duct the company to their seats and to perform similar services within Westminster Abbey.
2 D
418
APPENDIX I
The Honourable Joseph Max-
well-Scott.
Mr R. W. Middleton.
Mr Wilfred Middleton.
Mr Robert Montgomerie.
The Honourable R. Moreton.
Lieutenant-Colonel Edward
Mostyn.
Mr Keith Murray.
Mr B. Napier.
Mr Hugh Nevill.
Major Nicholson.
Major G. C. Nugent, Irish
Guards.
Mr A. M. Ogilvie.
Mr F. S. Osgood.
Mr E. H. Packe.
Captain Denham Parker.
Captain Parsons, R.A.
Mr Richard Pearson.
Mr Arthur Pollen.
Captain S. Pollen.
Mr H. Ralph Pendergast.
Mr J. G. PercivaL
Mr George Radcliffe.
Mr A. Rawlinson.
Mr O. Riddell.
Major Ross, C.B., Durham
Light Infantry.
Mr George W. E. Russell.
Sir William Russell, Bart.
Mr J. D. Ryder.
Major Schofield, R.A., S.C.
Mr Alexander Scott-Gatty.
Mr C. Scott-Gatty.
Major Basil Scott-Murray.
Mr Arthur Silvertop, R.N.
Mr F. J Synge, C.M.G.
Mr Paris Singer.
Mr A. E. Southall.
Mr Carlisle Spedding.
Mr William Arthur Spencer.
Mr Edward Stewart.
The Honourable Fitzroy
Stewart.
Mr Leopold C. Stewart.
The Honourable Edward
Stonor.
Major J. M. Steel, Coldstream
Guards.
The Lord Ninian Stuart.
Mr R. F. Synge, C.M.G.
Mr Henry Talbot.
The Honourable Alfred Talbot
Mr Walter Tomlinson.
Mr H. Trendell.
Major F. C. Trollope, late
Grenadier Guards.
Mr D. Tupper, M.V.O.
Colonel Vaughan.
Mr Algernon Wallace.
Mr Lionel Walrond.
Lieutenant E. S. Ward,
Grenadier Guards.
Mr Richard Ward.
Mr Wilfrid Ward.
Colonel Henry Warde.
Colonel Hanbury Williams,
C.M.G.
Mr Arthur Charles Wombwell.
Mr F. W. Wynne.
SCOTTISH OFFICERS OF ARMS.
Sir James Balfour Paul (Lyon
King of Arms).
Lady Balfour Paul.
Mr Francis James Grant
(Rothesay Herald).
Mr Robert S. Livingstone
(Albany Herald).
Mr William R. MacDonald
(Carrick Pursuivant).
Captain George S. C. Swinton
(March Pursuivant).
Mr John Home Stevenson
(Unicorn Pursuivant).
IRISH OFFICERS OF ARMS.
Sir Arthur Vicars, C.V.O.
(Ulster King of Arms).
Mr Henry C. Blake (Athlone
Pursuivant).
OFFICERS OF ORDERS OF
KNIGHTHOOD.
Mr C. G. Barrington, C.B.,
Gentleman Usher of the
Red Rod.
Most Reverend Robert
Machray, D.D., Prelate,
St Michael and St George.
Sir W. A. Baillie-Hamilton,
K.C.M.G., C.B., Officer
of Arms, St Michael and
St George.
Lady Baillie-Hamilton.
Sir W. J. Cuningham,
K.C.S.I., Secretary, Star
of India.
Sir Duncan A. Campbell,
Bart., Secretary, Thistle.
The Honourable Alan David
Murray, Gentleman
Usher Green Rod.
The Honourable Mrs Alan
Murray.
Major F. W. Lambart.
Secretary, St Patrick.
NO. 26. — LORDS-LlEUTENANT OF COUNTIES
(not being Peers).
Mr James H. Benyon (Berkshire).
Mrs Benyon.
Mr Alexander Peckover (Cambridgeshire).
Mr J. H. Arkwright (Herefordshire).
Mrs Arkwright.
Sir R. Williams-Bulkeley, Bart. (Anglesey).
The Lady Magdalen Williams-Bulkeley.
Sir J. Williams Drummond, Bart. (Car-
marthenshire).
Lady Williams Drummond.
Mr H. Davies-Evans (Cardiganshire).
Mrs Davies-Evans.
Mr John E. Greaves (Carnarvonshire).
Mrs Greaves.
Colonel Cornwallis West (Denbighshire).
Mrs Cornwallis West.
Mr Hughes of Kinmel (Flintshire).
The Lady Florentia Hughes.
Mr William M. R. Wynne (Merioneth-
shire).
Mrs Wynne.
Sir Watkin Williams-Wynn, Bart. (Mont-
gomeryshire).
Sir Charles Philipps, Bart. (Haverfordwest).
Lady Philipps.
Sir Powlett Milbank, Bart. (Radnorshire).
Lady Milbank.
Lieutenant-Colonel The Lord Binning
(Berwickshire).
The Lady Binning.
Sir James Colquhoun, Bart. (Dumbarton-
shire).
APPENDIX I
419
Mr Donald Cameron of Lochiel (Inverness-
shire).
Sir Alexander Baird, Bart. (Kincardine-
shire).
Captain M. Laing (Orkney).
Sir Hector Munro, Bart. (Ross and
Cromarty).
Lady Munro.
Sir Algernon Coote, Bart. (Queen's County).
Lady Coote.
Mr Hector Vandeleur (Clare).
Mrs Vandeleur.
The Viscount Stopford (Wexford).
The Viscountess Stopford.
Mr William Tillie (Londonderry).
Major C. K. O'Hara (Sligo).
No. 27. — HIGH SHERIFFS.
i. ENGLAND AND WALES.
Mr William C. Watson (Bedfordshire).
Mrs Watson.
Mr H. Owen Tudor (Berkshire).
Mrs Owen Tudor.
Mr Frederick C. Lloyd (Buckinghamshire).
Mrs Lloyd.
Mr Harold Coote (Huntingdonshire and
Cambridgeshire).
Mrs Coote.
Mr J. S. Harwood-Banner (Cheshire).
Mrs Harwood-Banner.
Captain W. P. Standish (Cumberland).
Mrs Standish.
Mr FitzHerbert Wright (Derbyshire).
Mrs Wright.
Colonel E. S. Walcott, C.B. (Devonshire).
Mrs Walcott.
Colonel J. B. S. Bullen (Dorsetshire).
Mrs Bullen.
Sir William Chaytor, Bart. (Durham).
Mr R. C. Gosling (Essex).
Mr James Horlick (Gloucestershire).
Mrs Horlick.
Mr Evelyn Simpson (Hertfordshire).
Mrs Evelyn Simpson.
Mr Edward L. Tomlin (Kent).
Mrs Edward Tomlin.
Captain Burns-Hartopp (Leicestershire).
Mrs Burns-Hartopp.
Mr John D. Saunders (Lincolnshire).
Mr George W. H. Bowen (County of
London).
Mrs Bowen.
Mr C. F. Cory-Wright (Middlesex.)
Mrs Cory- Wright.
Mr Edward Windsor Richards (Monmouth-
Mr Joh'rfN. Gurney (Norfolk).
Mr James Hornsby (Northamptonshire).
Mrs Hornsby.
Mr Thomas C. Fenwicke-Clennell ( Northum-
berland).
Mrs Fenwicke-Clennell.
Mr John P. C. Musters (Nottinghamshire).
Mrs Musters.
Captain C. W. Cottrell-Dormer (Oxford-
shire).
Mrs Cottrell-Dormer.
Mr J. Thursby-Pelham (Shropshire).
Mrs Thursby-Pelham.
Mr Cely Trevilian (Somersetshire).
Mrs Cely Trevilian.
Lieutenant-Colonel H. Le Roy Lewis,
D. S. O. (County of Southam pton).
Mrs Lewis.
Mr R. P. Copeland (Staffordshire).
Mrs Copeland.
Mr H. E. Buxton (Suffolk).
Mrs H. E. Buxton.
Mr Max L. Waechter (Surrey).
Mrs Waechter.
Mr Alfred H. Burton (Sussex).
Mrs Burton.
Mr F. E. Muntz (Warwickshire).
Mrs Muntz.
Mr Edward C. Schomberg (Wiltshire).
Mrs Schomberg.
Mr Edward A. Broome (Worcestershire).
Mrs Broome.
Sir Theophilus Peel, Bart. (Yorkshire).
Lady Peel.
Mr Arthur Knowles (Lancashire).
Mrs Knowles.
Mr W. Croyton (Cornwall).
Mrs Croyton.
Mr Russell Allen (Anglesey).
Mrs Allen.
Mr J. E. Moore-Gwyn (Breconshire).
Mrs Moore-Gwyn.
Dr R. D. Roberts (Cardiganshire).
Mrs Roberts.
Mr J. Morgan Davies (Carmarthenshire).
Mrs Davies.
Mr Ephraim Wood (Carnarvonshire).
Mrs Wood.
Sir Wyndham Hanmer, Bart. (Flintshire).
Lady Hanmer.
Mr Edward Daniel (Glamorganshire).
Mrs Daniel.
Mr Romer Williams (Merionethshire).
Mrs Williams.
Mr Hugh Lewis (Montgomeryshire).
Mrs Hugh Lewis.
Dr Henry Owen, D.C.L. (Pembrokeshire).
Mr Cecil R. Stephens (Radnorshire).
Mrs Stephens.
420
APPENDIX I
2. IRELAND.
Mr William Chaine (Antrim).
Mr Alexander Robinson (Armagh).
Mrs Robinson.
Mr D. H. Doyne (Carlow).
Mr T. J. Burrowes (Cavan).
Captain Boyle Creagh (Clare).
Captain J. C. McClintock (Donegal).
Mrs McClintock.
Major Blackwood Price (Down).
Mrs Price.
Mr Andrew Jameson (Dublin).
Mrs Jameson.
Mr Edward Archdale (Fermanagh).
Mr W. S. Waithman (Galway).
The Lady Phillippa Waithman.
Mr William T. J. Gun (Kerry).
Sir Kildare Borrowes, Bart. (Kildare).
Lady Borrowes.
Mr B. Homan Mulock (King's County).
Mrs Mulock.
Mr John Merrick Lloyd (Leitrim).
Mrs Lloyd.
Mr Richard de Ros Rose (Limerick).
Mrs Rose.
Major H. McCorkell (Londonderry).
Mr S. K. Jackson (Longford).
Mrs Jackson.
Mr John Heywood Lonsdale (Louth).
Mr C. H. Caldwell (Meath).
Captain E. J. Richardson (Monaghan).
Major A. French (Roscommon).
Mr Henry McCarrick (Sligo).
Major S. Phillips (Tipperary).
Mrs Phillips.
Mr F. P. Gervais (Tyrone).
Mrs Gervais.
Colonel J. H. Smyth, C.M.G. (Waterford).
The Lady Harriet Smyth.
Captain W. Glascott (Wexford).
Mrs Glascott.
Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Leslie Ellis
(Wicklow).
Mrs Leslie Ellis.
Alderman S. Lawther, J.P. (Belfast City).
Mrs Lawther.
Councillor Peter M'Cabe (High Sheriff of
Dublin City).
Mrs M'Cabe.
Councillor Vincent Nash (Limerick City).
Mrs Nash.
Mr Matthew A. Ballantine (Londonderry
City).
Mr W. F. Barnes (Sub-High Sheriff of West-
meath).
Mrs Barnes.
No. 28. — SHERIFFS OF SCOTLAND.
Sheriff David Brand.
Mrs Brand.
Sheriff Donald Crawford.
Sheriff Edward T. Salvesen, K.C.
Mrs Salveston.
Sheriff Sir John Cheyne, K.C.
Lady Cheyne.
Sheriff John Wilson, K.C.
Mrs Wilson.
Sheriff Christopher N. Johnston.
OTHER SCOTTISH OFFICIALS.
Mr Bailie Grieve, Senior Police Magistrate, Edinburgh.
Mr W. Slater Brown, Senior Bailie, „
Mr Thomas Hunter, W.S., Town Clerk, „
Sheriffs-Substitute Armour, Boyd, Buntine, Campbell, Gillespie, Lee, Lyell, Mackenzie.
Mrs Johnston.
Sheriff C. Kincaid Mackenzie, K.C.
Mrs Mackenzie.
Sheriff Henry Johnston, K.C.
Mrs Johnston.
Sheriff Andrew Jameson, K.C.
Mrs Jameson.
Sheriff C.J. Guthrie, K.C.
Mrs Guthrie.
No. 29. — CONVENERS OF COUNTIES IN SCOTLAND.
Mr Alexander Gordon.
Mr R. A. Oswald.
Sir George Houston Boswell, Bart.
Mr James Campbell.
Mr John Windsor Stuart.
Mr George Younger.
Mr M. Carthew-Yorstoun.
Sir James H. Gibson Craig, Bart.
Sir Charles Adam, Bart.
Mr Barnes Graham.
Lieutenant-Colonel M. A. Clarke.
Colonel Home Drummond.
Mr Robert King.
Mr C. H. Scott Plummer.
Mr John Bruce of Sumburgh.
Mr A. Peddie-WaddeL
Mr Andrew Lindsay.
APPENDIX I 421
No. 30. — OFFICIALS OF CHANNEL ISLANDS, ETC.
Major-General H. R. Abadie, C.B. (Lieu- Mr H. A. Giffard, K.C. (Bailiff of Guernsey).
tenant Governor of Jersey). Mr William F. Collings (Seigneur, Island of
Mrs Abadie. Sark).
Mr William H. Vernon (Bailiff of Jersey). Mr Thomas B. H. Cochrane (Deputy
Mrs Vernon. Governor of the Isle of Wight).
Major-General M. H. Saward, R.A. (Lieu- The Lady Adela Cochrane.
tenant Governor of Guernsey). Sir James Gell (Clerk of the Rolls, Isle of
Mrs Saward. Man).
No. 31. — BARONS OF THE CINQUE PORTS.
Mr Stafford Charles, the Speaker of the Cinque Ports (Mayor of New Romney).
Mr Henry Martyn Mowll, Baron of the Cinque Ports (Mayor of Dover).
Mr Frederick Adolphus Langham, Baron of the Cinque Ports (Mayor of Hastings).
Mr Henry Stephen Watts, Baron of the Cinque Ports (Mayor of Sandwich).
Mr Henry Strahan, Baron of the Cinque Ports (Mayor of Hythe).
Mr Frank Jarratt, Baron of the Cinque Ports (Mayor of Rye).
Mr F. A. Inderwick, K.C., Baron of the Cinque Ports (Mayor of Winchelsea).
Mr Frederick Austin, Baron of the Cinque Ports (Mayor of Faversham).
Mr Daniel Baker, Baron of the Cinque Ports (Deputy Mayor of Folkestone).
Mr James Hoskin, Baron of the Cinque Ports (Mayor of Margate).
Mr Herbert Horace Green, Baron of the Cinque Ports (Mayor of Ramsgate).
Mr Councillor Walter Joseph Solomon, Baron of the Cinque Ports (Mayor of Deal).
Mr Edwin Finn, Baron of the Cinque Ports (Mayor of Lydd).
Mr J. R. Diggle, Baron of the Cinque Ports (Mayor of Tenterden).
Mr A. Cohen, K.C., Judge of the Cinque Ports.
The Right Reverend Dr Webber, Bishop of Brisbane, Deputy Chaplain of the Cinque Ports.
Sir Wollaston Knocker, C.B., Solicitor of the Cinque Ports.
Mr Walter Dawes, Deputy Solicitor of the Cinque Ports.
No. 32. — MUNICIPAL AND OTHER LOCAL AUTHORITIES.
LORD MAYORS OF ENGLAND AND IRELAND, AND WIVES.
LORD PROVOSTS OF SCOTLAND, AND WIVES, ETC.
The Right Honourable Sir J. C. Dimsdale, The Lord Mayor and Lady Mayoress of
Bart., Lord Mayor of the City of Belfast.
The Lady Mayoress. The Right Honourable The Lord Provost of
The Lord Mayor and Lady Mayoress of \[rs Steel
Birmingham. The Honourable The Lord Provost of Glas-
The Lord Mayor and Lady Mayoress of gow
Bristo1- Miss Chisholm.
The Lord Mayor and Lady Mayoress of The Lord Provost of Dundee.
Leeds. Mrs Hunter.
The Lord Mayor and Lady Mayoress of The Lord provost of Aberdeen.
Liverpool. Mrs Fleming.
The Lord Mayor and Lady Mayoress of The Lord Provost of Perth.
Manchester. Mrs Maceregor
The Lord Mayor and Lady Mayoress of
Sheffield. Colonel Clifford Probyn, J.P. (Mayor of
The Right Honourable The Lord Mayor of Westminster).
York and Lady Mayoress. The Mayoress of Westminster.
CORPORATION OF LONDON.
ALDERMEN AND RECORDER. Alderman Sir Joseph Savory Bart
Alderman Sir David Evans, K.C.M.G.
Alderman Sir Henry Edmund Knight. Alderman Sir Joseph Renals, Bart.
Alderman Sir Reginald Hanson, Bart. Alderman Sir Walter Wilkin, K.C.M.G.
422
APPENDIX I
Alderman Sir G. Faudel Phillips, Bart.,
G.C.I.E.
Alderman Sir John Voce Moore.
Alderman Sir Alfred James Newton, Bart.
Alderman Sir Frank Green, Bart.
Alderman Sir Marcus Samuel.
Alderman Sir James Thomson Ritchie.
Mr Alderman John Pound.
Mr Alderman Walter Vaughan Morgan.
Alderman Sir William Purdie Treloar.
Mr Alderman George Wyatt Truscott.
Mr Alderman Frederick Prat Alliston.
Alderman Sir John Knill, Bart.
Mr Alderman Thomas Vezey Strong.
Mr Alderman Henry George Smallman.
Mr Alderman Thomas Boor Crosby.
Mr Alderman Howard Carlile Morris.
Mr Alderman David Burnett.
Sir Forrest Fulton, K.C. (Recorder).
SHERIFFS.
Mr Sheriff John Charles Bell.
Mr Sheriff Horace Brooks Marshall.
Sir Prior Goldney, Bart. (City Remem-
brancer).
Mr James Bell (Town Clerk of London).
LONDON COUNTY COUNCIL.
Mr John M. McDougall, Chairman of the
London County Council.
Mr A. M. Torrance.
Sir William Collins.
The Deputy-Chairman of the London County
Council.
CHAIRMEN OF COUNTY COUNCILS
(not being Peers, Privy Councillors, or Members of Parliament).
Mr Richard Prichard Jones (Anglesey).
Mr W. G. Mount (Berkshire).
Mr Robert Stephenson (Cambridgeshire).
Colonel J. R. Howell (Cardiganshire).
Mr Joseph Joseph (Carmarthenshire).
Mr Robert Hughes (Carnarvonshire).
Colonel George Dixon (Cheshire).
Mr H. C. Howard (Cumberland).
Mr O. Isgoed Jones, J.P. (Denbighshire).
Mr George Herbert Strutt, D. L. , J. P. (Derby-
shire).
Mr Samuel Storey, D.L., J.P. (Durham,
County Palatine).
Mr Joseph Martin (Ely, Isle of).
Mr Andrew Johnson (Essex).
Mr William Davies (Flintshire).
Mr John Blandy-Jenkins, J.P. (Glamorgan-
shire).
Colonel Prescott-Decie, D.L.. J.P. (Hereford-
shire).
Sir John Evans, K.C.B. (Hertfordshire).
Mr Godfrey Baring, D.L., J.P. (Isle of
Mr George Marsham (Kent).
Mr Hussey Packe (Leicestershire).
Mr William Embleton-Fox, J.P. (Lincoln-
shire, Lindsey).
Sir John H. Thorold, Bart. (Lincolnshire,
Kesteven).
Mr C. F. Tunnard (Lincolnshire, Holland).
The Honourable Charles Henry Wynn
(Merionethshire).
Mr R. D. M. Littler, C.B., K.C. (Middlesex).
Mr Edwin Grove (Monmouthshire).
Sir Charles E. G. Phillips, Bart. (Pembroke-
shire).
Mr Charles Coltman Rogers (Radnorshire).
Mr J. Bowen-Jones, J.P. (Shropshire).
Mr A. J. Goodford, D.L., J.P.(Somersetshire).
Mr Oliver Denn Johnson, J. P. (Suffolk, West).
Mr Edward Joseph Halsey, J.P. (Surrey).
Mr William Vicesimus Knox Stenning
(Sussex, East).
Mr John Stratford Dugdale, K.C., D.L., J.P.
(Warwickshire).
Lieutenant-Colonel Francis Markham, D.L.,
J.P. (Westmoreland).
Mr John William Willis Bund, D.L., J.P.
(Worcestershire).
Sir Charles Legard, Bart. (Yorkshire, East
Riding).
Mr Charles George Milnes-Gaskell, J.P.
(Yorkshire, West Riding).
Mr O'Donnell (Leitrim).
Mr Thomas B. Mitchell (Limerick).
CHIEF CONSTABLES.
Sir John Dunne, K.C.B.
Major T. J. Leadbetter.
MAYORS OF COUNTY BOROUGHS
(not being Peers or Members of Parliament).
Mr John P. Smith, J.P. (Barrow-in-Furness).
Mr Edward E. Phillips (Bath).
Mr Gibson Ferrier Steven (Berwick-upon-
Tweed).
Mr GeorgeS. Hazelhurst, J.P. (Birkenhead).
Alderman John Miles, J.P. (Bolton).
Dr George S. Wild (Bootle).
Mr George Frost (Bournemouth).
APPENDIX I
423
Mr William C. Lupton, J.P. (Bradford).
Alderman John Edward Stafford, J.P.
(Brighton).
Alderman Thomas Thornber, J.P. (Burnley).
Mr John Robert Morris (Burton-on-Trent).
Mr John Battersley (Bury).
Alderman George Collard, J.P. (Canterbury).
Mr Frank Beavan, J.P. (Cardiff).
Mr James Frost (Chester).
Mr Albert Samuel Tomson (Coventry).
Mr Nathaniel Page (Croydon).
Alderman Abraham Woodiwiss, J.P. (Derby).
Mr Edgar May Leest (Devonport).
Mr John Hughes (Dudley).
Mr Albert Edward Dunn (Exeter).
Alderman Alexander Gillies, J.P. (Gateshead).
Mr Samuel Bland (Gloucester).
Mr Moses Abraham (Great Grimsby).
Alderman William Brear (Halifax).
Alderman Herbert Coates (Hanley).
Alderman Ernest Woodhead, M. A. (Hudders-
field).
Mr William Alfred Gelder (Kingston-on-
Hull).
Mr Arthur Charles Churchman (Mayor of
Ipswich).
Alderman Edward Wood (Leicester).
Mr John William Ruddock, J.P. (Lincoln).
Alderman Joseph McLauchlan (Middles-
brough).
Alderman Henry William Newton (New-
castle-upon-Tyne).
Mr Frederick G. Adnitt, J.P. (Northampton).
Mr Russell James Colman, J.P. (Norwich).
Mr Edward Newcombe Elborne (Notting-
ham).
Alderman Jarnes Eckersley (Oldham).
Alderman Walter Gray, J.P. (Oxford).
Mr Joseph A. Bellamy, J.P. (Plymouth).
Mr William Thomas Dupree (Portsmouth).
Mr Alfred Holland BuH (Reading).
Alderman Samuel Turner (Rochdaje).
Colonel W. W. Pilkington, J.P. (St Helens).
Alderman Samuel Rudman (Salford).
Mr Frederick Aubrey Dunsford, J.P. (South-
ampton).
Mr George Beattie (South Shields).
Mr Albert Johnson (Stockport).
Mr John George Kirtley (Sunderland).
Mr Griffith Thomas (Swansea).
Mr William J. Pearman-Smith (Walsall).
Mr Joseph Charlton Parr (Mayor of Warring-
ton).
Mr John Henry Chesshire (West Brom-
wich).
Mr Leslie William Spratt, J.P. (West
Ham).
Alderman J. F. Wilson, J.P. (West Hartle-
pool).
Mr Richard Edward Kellett (Wigan).
Mr B. D. Canceller (Winchester).
Mr Charles Paulton Plant (Wolverhampton).
Alderman Walter Holland (Worcester).
Alderman Walter Diver (Great Yarmouth).
MAYORS OF METROPOLITAN BOROUGHS.
Mr Haworth Barnes, J.P. (Battersea).
Colonel Samuel B. Bevington, V.D., J.P.
(Bermondsey).
Mr C. E. Fox, J.P. (Bethnal Green).
Mr William Scott-Scott, J.P. (Camberwell).
Major W. F. Woods (Chelsea).
Mr Benjamin J. Jacob (Deptford).
Mr Enos Howes, J.P. (Finsbury).
Mr Timothy Davis (Fulham).
Mr Ion Hamilton Benn (Greenwich).
Mr Walter Johnson, J.P. (Hackney).
Mr Thomas Chamberlen, J.P. (Hammer-
smith).
Alderman Sir Henry Hanhart, LL.B. (Hamp-
stead).
Alderman George Phillips (Holborn).
Mr William J. Crump, J.P. (Islington).
Sir H. Seymour King, K.C.I.E., M.P. (Ken-
sington).
Mr James White, J.P., LL.D. (Lambeth).
Mr T. W. Williams (Lewisham).
Mr Edmund Barnes, J.P. (St Pancras).
Mr William Crooks (Poplar).
Mr Edward Gates (Shoreditch).
Mr Alderman Frederick Redman (South-
wark).
Mr Alderman Edward Mann (Stepney).
Mr William Eve (Stoke Newington).
Mr William J. Lancaster (Wandsworth).
Mr John J. Messent (Woolwich).
MAYORS OF ENGLAND, WALES AND IRELAND
(not being Peers or Members of Parliament).
(The names of the Mayors of Boroughs, not being Metropolitan or County Boroughs or Cinque
Ports, are not given in the Earl MarshaCs Lists.)
Aberavon.
Abergavenny.
Aberystwyth.
Abingdon.
Accrington.
Aldeburgh.
Andover.
Appleby.
Arundel.
Ashton - under •
Lyne.
Bacup.
Banbury.
Banger.
Barnsley.
Barnstaple.
Basingstoke.
Batley.
Beaumaris.
Beccles.
Bedford.
Beverley.
Bewdley.
Bideford.
Bishop's Castle.
Blackpool.
Blandford
Forum.
Bodmin.
Brackley.
424
APPENDIX I
Brecon.
Bridgnorth.
Dunstable.
Durham.
King's Lynn.
Kingston - on -
Okehampton.
Ossett.
Stoke - upon
Trent.
Bridgewater.
East Retford.
Thames.
Oswestry.
Stratford - upon-
Bridport.
Eastbourne.
Lam peter.
Pembroke.
Avon.
Brighouse.
Eccles.
Lancaster.
Penryn.
Sudbury.
Buckingham.
Evesham.
Launceston.
Penzance.
Sutton Coldfield.
Burslem.
Eye.
Leamington Spa.
Peterborough.
Swindon.
Bury St E d-
Falmouth.
Leigh.
Pontefract.
Tamworth.
munds.
Flint.
Leominster.
Poole.
Taunton.
Calne.
Glastonbury.
Lewes.
Pudsey.
Tenby.
Cambridge.
Glossop.
Lichfield.
Pwllheli.
Tewkesbury.
Cardigan.
Godalming.
Liskeard.
Queenborough.
Thetford.
Carlisle.
Godmanchester.
Llandovery.
Rawtenstall.
Thornaby - on -
Carmarthen.
Grantham.
Llanfyllin.
Reigate.
Tees.
Carnarvon.
Gravesend.
Llanidloes.
Richmond (Sur-
Tiverton.
Chard.
Guildford.
Londonderry.
rey).
Todmorden.
Chatham.
Harrogate.
Longton.
Richmond
Torquay.
Chelmsford.
HartlepooL
Lostwithiel.
(Yorks).
Torrington,
Cheltenham.
Harwich.
Loughborough.
Ripon.
Great.
Chesterfield.
Chichester.
Haslingden.
Haverford west .
Louth.
Lowestoft.
Rochester.
Rotherham.
Totnes.
Truro.
Chippenham.
Hedon.
Ludlow.
Ruthin.
Tunbridge Wells
Chorley.
Helston.
Luton.
Ryde.
Tynemouth.
Christchurch.
Hemel Hemp-
Lyme Regis.
Saffron Walden.
Wakefield.
Clitheroe.
stead.
Lymington.
St Albans.
Wallingford.
Colchester.
Henley- on -
Macclesfield.
St Ives (Corn-
Wareham.
Colne.
Tbames.
Maidenhead.
wall).
Warrington.
Congleton.
Hereford.
Maidstone.
St Ives (Hunts).
Wednesbury.
Conway.
Hertford.
Maldon.
Salisbury.
Wells.
Cowbridge.
Heywood.
Malmesbury.
Saltash.
Welshpool.
Crewe.
High Wycombe.
Mansfield.
Scarborough.
Wenlock.
Darlington.
Higham Ferrers.
Marlborough.
Shaftesbury.
Weymouth.
Dartmouth.
Honiton.
Middleton.
Shrewsbury.
Whitehaven.
Darwen.
Hove.
Mon mouth.
Smethwick.
Widnes.
Daventry.
Huntingdon.
Montgomery.
Southend-on-Sea
Wilton.
Denbigh.
Hyde.
Morley.
South Molton.
Winchelsea.
Devizes.
Ilkeston.
Morpeth.
Southport.
Windsor.
Dewsbury.
Ipswich.
Mossley.
Southwold.
Wisbech.
Doncaster.
Jarrow-on-Tyne.
Neath.
Stafford.
Wokingham.
Dorchester.
Keighley.
Nelson.
Stalybridge.
Woodstock.
Douglas.
Kendal.
Newark.
Stamford.
Workington.
Droitwich.
Kidderminster.
Newbury.
Stockton - upon-
Worthing.
Dukinfield.
Kidwelly.
Newport.
Tees.
Wrexham.
Yeovil.
PROVOSTS OF SCOTLAND.
( The names
• of the Scottish Provosts, not being Lord Provosts, do not c
Earl Marshals lists).
ippear in the
Airdrie.
Burntisland.
Dumfries.
Go van.
Kilrenny.
Annan.
Anstruther (Eas-
Campbeltown.
Coatbridge.
Dunbar.
Dunfermline.
Haddington.
Hamilton.
Kinghorn.
Kintore.
ter).
Crail.
Dysart.
Hawick.
Kirkcaldy.
Anstruther( Wes-
Cromarty.
Elgin.
Inveraray.
Kirkcudbright.
ter).
Cullen.
Falkirk.
Inverkeithing.
Kirkwall.
Arbroath.
Culross.
Forfar.
Inverness.
Lanark.
Ayr.
Cupar-Fife.
Forres.
Inverurie.
Lauder.
Banff.
Dingwall.
Fortrose.
Irvine.
Leith.
Bervie.
Dornoch.
Galashiels.
Jedburgh.
Linlithgow.
Brechin.
Dumbarton.
Greenock.
Kilmarnock.
Lochmaben.
APPENDIX I
425
Montrose.
Musselburgh.
Nairn.
New Galloway.
North Berwick.
Berwick - on -
Tweed.
Bristol.
Canterbury.
Carmarthen.
Oban.
Paisley.
Peebles.
Peterhead.
Pittenweem.
Port Glasgow.
Queen's Ferry.
Renfrew.
Rothesay.
Rutherglen.
St Andrews.
Sanquhar.
Selkirk.
Stirling.
Stranraer.
Tain.
Whithorn.
Wick.
Wigton.
SHERIFFS OF CITIES— ENGLAND AND WALES.
Chester. Kingston-upon- Newcastle - on - Poole.
Exeter. Hull. Tyne. Southampton.
Gloucester. Lichfield. Norwich. Worcester.
Haverfordwest. Lincoln. Nottingham. York.
Oxford.
No. 33. — LEARNED AND OTHER SOCIETIES.
Mr A. B. Kempe (Treasurer, Royal Society).
Mrs Kempe.
Mr James Dewar, F.R.S. (Representative of
the Royal Institution of Great Britain).
Mrs Dewar.
Sir John Murray, K.C.B., LL.D. (Represen-
tative of the Royal Society of Edin-
burgh).
Lady Murray.
Professor R. Atkinson (President of the Royal
Irish Academy).
Sir John Evans, K.C.B. (Vice- President of
the Society of Antiquaries).
Lady Evans.
Mr David Murray, LL.D. (Vice- President,
Society of Antiquaries of Scotland).
Mrs David Murray.
Sir Edward J. Poynter (President of the Royal
Academy of Arts).
Lady Poynter.
Sir Thomas Drew (President of the Royal
Hibernian Academy).
Lady Drew.
Sir William S. Church, Bart., M.D. (President
of the Royal College of Physicians).
Lady Church.
Sir Thomas R. Eraser, M.D. (President of
the Royal College of Physicians of Edin-
burgh).
Lady Eraser.
Sir L. J. Nixon, M.D. (President of the
Royal College of Physicians of Ire-
land).
Lady Nixon.
Sir Henry G. Howse (President of the Royal
College of Surgeons of England).
Lady Howse.
Mr J. Halliday Groom, M.D. (President
of the Royal College of Surgeons of
Edinburgh).
Mr Myles (President of the Royal College of
Surgeons of Ireland).
Mrs Myles.
Dr James Finlayson (President of the Faculty
of Physicians and Surgeons, Glasgow).
Sir A. C. Mackenzie, Mus. Doc., LL.D.
(Principal, Royal Academy of Music).
Lady Mackenzie.
Mr William Emerson (President of Royal
Institute of British Architects).
Mrs Emerson.
Mr Charles Hawksley (President of the
Institution of Civil Engineers).
Mrs Hawksley.
Sir Ernest Clarke (Representative of the
Royal Agricultural Society).
Lady Clarke.
Sir Ralph Anstruther of Balcaskie, Bart.
(Chairman of the Highland and Agri-
cultural Society of Scotland).
Lady Anstruther.
Mr E. J. Gillespie.
MrJ. Inr
ines Rogers (Chairman of the London
Chamber of Commerce).
Mrs Rogers.
Sir Clements Markham, K.C.B., F.R.S.
(President of the Royal Geographical
Society).
Lady Markham.
Sir Henry Irving (President of the Actors'
Association).
Sir Hubert Parry, Mus. Doc., D.C.L.
(Director of the Royal College of Music).
The Lady Maude Parry.
No. 34. — NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF FRIENDLY SOCIETIES.
Mr W. G. Bunn. Mr Alfred Chapman.
Mr J. L. Stead. Mr J. Boyd.
Mr. J. E. Cleveland. Mr F. Litchfield.
Mr J. J. Stockall.
Mr G. Wilde.
Mr R. J. Vallender.
Mr W. Marlow.
Mr Richardson Camp-
bell.
Mr W. Wightman.
426
APPENDIX I
No. 35. — REPRESENTATIVES OF RAILWAY COMPANIES.
Mr Sam Fay (Great Central Railway).
Mr Gooday (Great Eastern Railway).
The Lord Claud Hamilton (Great Eastern
Railway).
Mr J. L. Wilkinson (Great Western Railway).
Mr Thomas Isaac Allen (Great Western Rail-
way).
Mr W. Forbes (London, Brighton and
South Coast Railway).
Mr F. Harrison (London and North- Western
Railway).
Mr Charles T. Owens (London and South
Western Railway).
Mr John Matheson (Midland Railway).
Mr Vincent W. Hill (South Eastern and
Chatham Railways).
Mr Cosmo Bonsor (South Eastern and
Chatham Railways).
Mr George Gibb (North Eastern Railway).
Sir James Thompson (Caledonian Railway).
Mr G. B. Wieland (North British Railway).
Mr James Gray (Great Northern (Ireland)
Railway).
Mr W. S. Golding (Great Southern and
Western Railway).
Sir R. Cusack (Midland Great Western Rail-
way).
Mr A. Ross (Great Northern Railway).
Sir George Armytage, Bart. (Lancashire and
Yorkshire Railway).
Mr J. A. F. Aspinall (Lancashire and York-
shire Railway).
No. 36. — THE FOLLOWING NAMES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN ANY OF THE
OFFICIAL CATEGORIES. THEY COMPRISE THOSE OF DISTINGUISHED
FOREIGNERS NOT ATTACHED TO MISSIONS, OF NOMINEES OF THE
CORONATION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND OF THE DEAN AND
CHAPTER OF WESTMINSTER, AND OF A NUMBER OF PERSONS WHO
WERE INVITED FOR VARIOUS REASONS.
The Duke of Alba.
The Right Reverend Bishop Awdry, D.D.,
of South Tokio.
Mrs Edwin Abbey.
Mrs Alcock.
Mrs Allcroft.
Mr George Anderson (White Rod).
Miss Astor.
Mrs Bradley.
Miss Bradley.
Miss Emily Bradley.
Mrs Hugh Bradley.
The Lady Frances Balfour.
Lady Bridge.
Mrs J. E. C. Bodley.
Madame Sarah Bernhardt.
Mr Arthur C. Benson.
Mr Baker.
Mr Montague Barlow.
Miss Bainbridge.
Colonel Sir E. Bradford, G.C.B., K.C.S.I.
Lady Bradford.
Miss Beryl Bradford.
The Reverend H. M. Burge.
Mrs Burge.
Baron Boxall.
Baroness Boxall.
Mrs Bramwell Booth.
Sir James Blyth, Bart.
Mr Thomas Brock, R.A.
Mr Moberley BelL
Mrs Moberley Bell.
The Honourable Mrs Beddard.
Mrs Sylvia Birchenough.
Mrs Beauclerk.
Sir W. H. Browne-Ffolkes, Bart.
Miss Emily Bailey.
Miss Buxton.
Captain Burne, Trinity House.
Monsieur Philippe Crozier, Chief of the Pro-
tocol of the French Foreign Office.
Sir Vincent Caillard.
Lady Cathcart.
Mr J. D. Campbell, C.M.G.
Reverend F. B. Campbell.
Mr William Cazalet.
Mrs Cazalet.
The Honourable Mrs Chetwynd.
Mr Somers Clarke.
Captain A. W. Clarke.
Major Cox.
Mr Herbert Cox.
Mr Henry Cook.
Colonel Crutchley.
Mrs Crutchley.
Mr Frank Dymoke.
Mrs Dymoke.
Mr J. R. Dasent, C.B.
Mrs Dasent.
Mr Carless Davis.
Baron von Deichmann.
Baroness von Deichmann.
APPENDIX I
427
Miss Emily Digby.
Mr T. A. Dorrien-Smith.
Mr Henry Duckworth.
Mr J. Duncan.
Mrs Duncan.
The Vice-Provost of Eton.
Miss Ellis.
The Honourable Mrs Charles Eliot.
Miss Eliot.
Mrs Charles Elliot.
Rear-Admiral W. H. Fawkes.
Mrs Fawkes.
Miss Farquhar.
Miss Florence M. Fielding.
Miss Fletcher (His Majesty's nurse).
Mrs Fitzgerald.
Lieutenant-General Fryer, C.B.
Mrs Fryer.
Mr Emil Fuchs.
Mr Henry N. Gladstone.
The Honourable Mrs Gladstone.
Mr Wilhelm Ganz.
Mrs Ganz.
Mr G. L. Gomme.
Mr C. Grant Robertson.
Mrs Gray.
Mrs Philip Green.
Miss Alice Grenfell.
The Reverend J. J. Hornby, D.D., Provost
of Eton.
MrsHopeVere.
Mrs Claud Hobart.
Lady Hamilton.
Miss Haynes (His Majesty's nurse).
Miss Hargood.
Mr J. E. Harrison.
Mrs Bruce Hart.
Miss Hart.
Mrs Henson.
Miss Henson.
Miss Joan Howard.
Major Hussey.
Mrs Hussey.
Mr Joish.
Mr Charles Alfred Jones.
Mr Henry Jones- Davies.
Lieutenant-General Sir T. Kelly -Kenny,
K.C.B.
Baron de Heeckeren de Kell.
Baroness de Heeckeren de Kell.
Miss Kemys-Tynte.
Mr Charles Kerr.
Mrs Charles Kerr.
The Honourable and Very Reverend T- W.
Leigh, D.D., Dean of Hereford.
Miss Alice Leigh.
Miss Langtry.
Mr Harry Lee.
Mrs Lee.
Mr F. H. Lee.
Mrs Lascelles.
Mr A. F. G. Leveson Gower.
Mr Jenkyn Lewis.
Count Joachim Moltke, G.C.V.O.
The Honourable Mrs Maguire.
The Honourable Sir Schomberg McDonnell,
K.C.B.
Sir J. R. Heron-Maxwell, Bart.
Colonel Sir J. T. Maxwell, K.C.B.
Lady Maxwell.
Brigadier-General Maitland.
The Reverend Canon Madan.
The Reverend A. MacColl.
Miss MacDonald.
Mrs Maund.
Mr A. Murray-Smith.
Mrs A. Murray-Smith.
Miss Micklethwaite.
Mr S. S. Mossop.
Mr Robert U. Morgan.
The Duke de Noailles.
The Duchess de Noailles.
Mr W. C. Oman.
Miss Dorothy Ommanney.
Prince Henry of Pless.
Princess Henry of Pless.
Lady Penn Symons.
Lady Parratt.
Miss Parratt.
Mrs Perugini.
Lieutenant-Colonel C. D. Paterson.
Mr William Parry-Evans.
Sir William Russell, Bart. , Secretary of the
Coronation Executive Committee.
Mr Idris Bey Raghet.
Mrs Radcliff.
Mrs Richmond Ritchie.
Mr J. W. Rob.
Mrs Roberts.
Mrs John Roberts.
Reverend A. W. Robinson.
Rear-Admiral Simpson, Chilian Navy.
Mrs Ralph Sneyd.
Lady Seymour.
Sir Albert Seymour, Bart.
Mr Vivian Smith.
The Lady Sybil Smith.
Sir Charles Villiers Stanford.
Lady Stanford.
Reverend John Storrs.
Mrs Storrs.
Colonel Mair Stuart, C.B.
Count de San Martino, M.V.O., Marine
Painter in Ordinary to the King.
Lieutenant-Colonel Charles Isham Strong.
Captain Statham.
Mr J. A. Stead.
Miss Stanley.
Mrs Melville Simons.
Mr J. C. Thynne.
Miss Thynne.
Mrs Thynne.
428
APPENDIX I
Miss Agatha Thynne.
Miss Beryl Thynne.
Professor L. Tuxon, the Queen's Special
Artist.
Sir L. Alma Tadema, R.A.
Lady Tadema.
The Right Reverend Bishop Tucker of
Uganda.
Miss Tail.
The Honourable Lady Tryon
Sir Henry Thompson, Bart.
Reverend M. C. Taylor, D.D.
Captain A. S. Thompson, C.B.
Captain Towse, B.C.
Mrs Towse.
Colonel Trench.
Mr D. Croal Thompson.
Mrs Croal Thompson.
Dr Henry Troutbeck.
Mrs John Troutbeck.
Miss Troutbeck.
Miss Edith Troutbeck.
Mr G. R. Theobald.
Mrs Vicars.
Mrs Albert Vicars.
Mr Villiers.
Mr W. Graham Vivian.
Captain Vyvyan, Trinity House.
Mr Scrymgeour Wedderburn.
Mrs Scrymgeour Wedderburn.
The Lady Eva Wemyss.
Miss Wilberforce.
Sir Henry White.
Lady White.
Reverend Dr Woods.
Mrs Woods.
Mr G. S. Woods.
Reverend F. W. Welldon.
Mrs Wombwell.
Mr Wade.
Mrs Wade.
Reverend C. Williamson.
Major-General W. P. Wright.
Mrs Wright.
Mrs Waters.
Canon Christopher Wordsworth.
Lieutenant-Colonel Maxwell Witham.
Miss Florence Williams.
Sir William Watson.
Reverend Joseph Wood, D.D., Head Master
of Harrow.
Mrs Wood.
Mrs Wauchope.
Colonel Albert Webb.
Mrs Webb.
The Honourable Mrs Eliot Yorke.
General J. M. Ashton.
Mrs Ashton.
Mrs E. L. Baylies.
Mr W. H. Buckler.
The Honourable H. B. Brown.
Mrs Drexel.
The Honourable J. W. Griggs.
The Right Reverend Bishop
Hartzell. U.S.A.
The Honourable F. W. Holls.
Mr David P. Morgan.
Mr J. Pierpont Morgan.
Mrs J. P. Morgan.
Miss Morgan.
Mr Joseph Peabody.
The Honourable Oscar Straus.
Mr J. C. White.
No. 37. — MASTERS AND BOYS OF WESTMINSTER ScnooL.1
Head Master — Reverend James Gow, M.A. , Litt.D.
Master of the Kings Scholars— Reverend A. G. S. Raynor, M.A.
Masters and Masters' Families : — Mrs Gow ; Reverend W. Failes, M.A., and Mrs Failes ; Mr
W. G. Etheridge, M.A., and Mrs Etheridge ; Mr E. L. Fox, M.A., and Mrs Fox ; Mr A.
C. Liddell, M.A., and Mrs Liddell ; Mr I. F. Smedley, M.A., and Mrs Smedley ; Mr R.
Tanner, M.A., and Miss Tanner : Mr J. Tyson, B.A. , and Mrs Tyson ; Mrs Raynor ; Mr
B. F. Hardy, M.A. ; Mr J. J. Huckwell, M.A. ; Mr W. N. Just, M.A. ; Mr W. Kneen ;
Reverend G. H. Nail, M.A. ; Mr J. Sargeaunt, M.A. ; Mr E. C. Sherwood, M.A. ; Mr
A. S. F. Gow, Mr J. C. Gow, Mr R. C. Gow, Mr R. E. Tanner, Mr L. Tanner, Mr F.
Failes. Mr B. Failes.
1 The names of the Westminster boys and their masters, with the exception of that of
the headmaster, do not appear in the Earl Marshal's lists, although each of the King's
scholars received a formal invitation. In view of the intimate connection which St
Peter's College has had for centuries with all the great ceremonies which have taken
place in the Abbey, and also of the traditional part assigned to the King's scholars in the
Coronation service, it has been thought right to record the names of the representatives
of Westminster School who were present at the Coronation of King Edward VII. The
Reverend Dr Gow, the headmaster, has been kind enough to furnish the lists.
APPENDIX I 429
The A-in/s Scholars :-W. A. Greene, W. T. Kennedy, W. T. S. Sonnenschein, J. A. C.
Highmore, A. T. Willett, F. I. Harrison, T. C. S. Keely, F. W. Hubback, F. H.
Nichols, G. T. Boag, P. H. Ormiston, D. S. Robertson, A. L. Grossman, G. C. Brooke,
E. A. Bell, J. Poyser, H. B. Philby, J. R. Trench, C. L. Crowe, E. W. Lane-Clay-
pon, R. G. Gardner, J. S. Lewis, G. W. Philips, A. T. Coleby, E. W. D. Colt-Williams,
F. M. Maxwell, G. Cooper Willis, A. G. R. Henderson, B. G. Cobb. O. H. Walters,
O. C. Chapman, W. J. Bonser, E. C. Chesney, H. T. Tizard, A. C. Bottomley, S. D.
Charles, R. Hackforth, G. R. Wilson, E. F. C. Mosse, W. H. Whitworth, M. Shearman,
J. W. Craig, W. F. Waterfield, H. L. Geare, F. H. Budden, A. P. Waterfield, W. R.
Birchall, H. I. P. Hallett, H. D. Adrian, M. T. Maxwell, G. S. Bendall, G. R. Radcliffe,
G. E. Whitworth, G. M. Rambaut, V. M. Barrington-Ward, W. J. Leach, R. C. G. Le
Blond, M. F. Ashwin, R. E. Nott-Bower, P. T. Rawlings.
From Grant' s House : — C. B. H. Knight, S. Dickson, H. Logan, H. T. Kite, J. Harrison,
R. W. Reed, K. M. Macmorran, A. L. Stephen, J. D. H. Dickson, J. L. Johnston, L.
E. Woodbridge, L. G. Kirkpatrick, H. C. Pedler, A. F. Noble.
' From Rigaucf s House :— C. Powers, C. B. Holland, E. E. Atherley-Jones, W. S. Lonsdale,
C. F. Seddon, C. J. Couchman, D. Clark, F. S. Fleuret.
From Home Boarders .— G. D. Johnston, P. H. Napier, P. M. Bartlett, J. C. Vernon, H. A.
Woodhouse, C. Kent, G. W. Murray, E. T. Corfield, R. C. Oppenheimer, A. H. Pear-
son, M. Macdonald, R. W. Foxlee, C. C. Tudge, P. T. Davies, T. T. Stoker.
From Ashburnham House :— K. N. Colvile, A. K. Clark- Kennedy, A. H. Connolly, A. H.
Aglionby, R. W. Geddes, T. Kirkland, A. R. Malcolm, R. Meats, H. F. Saunders, G.
Schwann, L. R. Walton, C. Wood-Hill, W. M. Scott.
PLACED IN THE TRIFORIUM.
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PRESS.
Two hundred and thirty-one Press Representatives were assigned seats in the Triforium.
The leading Press Agencies and London Daily and Illustrated Papers were each assigned two
places, the minor London and principal Provincial, Indian and Colonial Papers one seat
each ; whilst the selection of the Representatives of the Foreign Press was placed in the hands
of the Foreign Ambassadors and Ministers.
PLAN OF THE ROYAL BOX
WESTMINSTER ABBEY
AUGUST gth, 1902.
APPROVED BY THE KING.
Leopold
Batt«nD«rg.
Duke Adolf
Kreidrich of
Mocklenburg-
StreUtx. M
Pr:nres<
Princeai
Victoria-
Alice
Victoria
of
PathcUof
of
Alice of
Cono&ught
Connaugbt
Albany
Batten berg.
Prinp*
Prince
Prino*
Prince
Charles
Albert of
Arthur
of
Scbleawig-
of
of
Denmark.
Holitein.
autecberg.
Conoa aght.
Their Royal Highnesses Prince Edward and Prince Albert of Wales were also
present in the Royal Box though their names do not appear in the plan.
o
B. PUN OF THE CHOIR, WESTMINSTER ABBEY, AUGUST 9% 1902.
Approved by The King.
54
Crown Prince
of Denmark
65
Prince of Lelningen
168
Duke de Noai les
Prince Henry of
*5Ss-
1
Prince Henry
of Prussia
S3
DukeofSpmrU
Princess Victor
of Hohenlohe
167
Dochesi de Noafllei
Princess Henry of
Pleat
Prince Andrew
of Greece
2
'riccest Henry
of Prussia
57
Count Gleichen
180
M9
Sir West Kidgeny
114
IXKheM of
Sparta
Rammingen
Michaelo«Kl> '
3
Crown Prince ol
Koumania
Ras Makunan
(Ethiopia
. 165
Sir W. MacgreRor
H
120
Mis. Ridgeway
113
Countess Torby
51
Grind Duke oT
HMM
Countess Feodore
Gleichen
164
Lady Macgregor
X
ffl
o
121
Sir Walter Sendall
112
Duke oi Teck,
Crown Princess
of Kouniania
50
MkH.jH
Connies* Victoria
Gleichea
163
Sir E. Barton
122
Lady Sendall
111
Duchess of Teck
6
Austro-
Hungarian
Aml'as^ailrrf
Jg
40
Madame it
Sual
Countess Helen*
Gleicheo
162
Lady Barton
o
123
The Master of
the Rolls
Prince Francis
ofTtck
6
French
Ambassador
' 48
Turkish
Ambassador
62
Sir M. Hick*Beach
161
Sir Albert Hime
po
124
Lady Herm Collins
Prince Alexander
of Teck
7
American
Ambassador
£?S
160
Mitt Hime
125
Lord Justice Romer
108
47
Madame
Anthopoolw
Duke of Alba
8
Mrs. Orate
64
Mr. Chamberlain
159
SirF.Jeone
. 126
Lady Romer
107
Count Mensdorff
48
luliin
Ambassador
65
Mn. Chamberlab
158
JUdyJeune
127
Lord Justice
Mathew
106
Sir II. CampbeD-
Banncrman
9
Ambassador
45
Madam* Ptnj»
Lord George
HamfhoQ
Lord Justice
Vaughan Williams
128
Misi Matbew
106
Sir W. Harconrt
10
Duchess of
Manda.
44
Lady George
Hamilton"
nfia.-
128
Lord Young
104
Lady Harcotat
11
Portuguese
Ambassador
Ambassador
08
Mr. Ritchie
165
Lord Jwtice
Coeena Hardy
130
Mis. Youn;;
103
Mr.Asquilh
43
12
Danish Enroy
£££,
69
Mrs. Ratchie
154
Miss Cocoa Hardy
Sir
Michael Herbert
102
Mrs. Asqnith
Hayashi
70
Mr. Brodrick
153
Lord Pearson
132
Lady Herbert
101
Mr. Brjee
13
Madame
deBille
4t
1'crsian Enroy
14
Swedish anil
Norwegian
F.nvoy
71
Mits Brodrick
153
Lady Pearson
133
Mr. Gerald Balfour
100
Mrs. Bryce
40
Belgian Enroy
72
Mr. Akers Douglas
151
Lord Chief
Baron Pallet
134
Lady Betty Balfonr
99
Mr. Shaw-Leferre
15
Countess
Lewenhaupt
39
Sir .
73
Mrs. Akers Douglas
Mils Pane.
135
Mr. Robinson
^L^"
16
SirN.O-Cooor
74
Mr. Hanbury
149
Sir W. Hart-Dyke
136.
Mrs. Robinson
SircV,
38
Sir
F. R. Plnnkett
17
Lady O'Conor
75
Mrs. Hanbory
148
Lady E. Hart-Dyke
137
The Lord Advocate
96
Lady Dilke
37
Mr.
G. Wyndhara
- '76
The Lord Justice
Clerk of Scotland
147
Mr. H. Gladstone
Mrs. G. Murray
95
Mr. A. Morley
18
Sir H. Morti-
mer Durand
36
Countess
Grosvenor
77
Mr. Long
Mrs. Gladstone
139
Sir E. Malet
94
Sir W3frid Laorier
LadyDurand
78
Lady Doreen Long
145
Sir E. Fry
Lady Ermyntrude
Malet
Lady Laurier
35
Miss Balfour
20
The Hon.
W. Palersoo
Lady Fry
141
Sir Horace Rumbold
92
Mr. Seddoo
Sir F. Borden
W. S. FeilrJlng
80
143
• Mrs. St. Aubyn
142
Lady Kumbold
91
Mrs. Seddon
21
Lady Borden
33
Miss FeiJding
Sir W. M»lock
(Interpreter)
22
Count George
1 81 82 83 84 85 1 86 87 88
prf p. M.htr.0. MhMtf* 1 «<£"«« ^ ES?£±£j°' **'£**
r^323^3~t^l s> *=** *-»r
89 90
, "5 Ar«of
ftZZ *.o««.
Seckendorff..
23
Khan
a.-* — >M* »-»£
M0,fe rts"^"
26 25 24
., _ .. Maharajah of i Maharajah
Mrs-Gully Gwa{ior | of Kolh^ur
This is a facsimile of the Plan of the Choir as it appears in the Earl Marshal's List though several
changes were made in the distribution of the seats after the plan was completed. Thus the Italian
Ambassadress was absent, and places seem to have been given in the Choir to Sir John Forrest,
Minister of Defence of the Australian Commonwealth, and to Lady Forrest, whose names are not on
the plan. No attempt has been made to correct any of the names, otherwise one or two slight
rectifications might have been effected. Thus the prefix " Hon. "is given to two Colonial Ministers
though the superior title of " Right Hon." is omitted in the case of all the Privy Councillors.
APPENDIX II
The following is the Form and Order of the Coronation of Their Majesties
King Edward VII. and Queen Alexandra, which was actually used at West-
minster Abbey on August 9, 1902, being abbreviated from the service drawn
up for use on June 26, the date originally fixed for the Coronation.
At a Privy Council held at Buckingham Palace on April 24, 1902, an Order in
Council was issued approving the form of service then submitted to the King.
By a previous Order in Council, on July i, 1901, the Archbishop of Canter-
bury was directed, in accordance with precedent, to prepare the service. The
Archbishop thereupon consulted the Bishop of Winchester, Clerk of the Closet
to the King (now Archbishop of Canterbury), who in turn consulted Canon
Armitage Robinson (now Dean of Westminster), and in the result the Form
and Order was drawn up, embodying certain suggestions made by His Majesty,
which received formal approval at the Council held on April 24, 1902.
The service which was taken as the basis of the Form and Order was that
used at the Coronation of William IV., being the last one which provided for
the crowning of a Queen Consort. This service was, however, felt to be too
long, and the following modifications were approved by His Majesty's Order
in Council.
The ceremony of the First Oblation was dispensed with, of which the Rubric
was as follows, and came immediately after the Recognition : —
"The Archbishop goeth down and before the altar puts on his cope, then
goeth and standeth on the north side of it, and the Bishops who are to read the
Litany do also vest themselves. And the officers of the wardrobe, etc., spread
carpets and cushions on the floor and steps of the altar. And here first the
Bible, Patten, and Cup are to be brought and placed upon the altar. Which
being done, the King, supported by the two Bishops of Durham and Bath and
Wells, and attended as always by the Dean of Westminster, the Lords that carry
the Regalia going before him, goes down to the altar and, kneeling upon the
steps of it, makes his first oblation, uncovered, which is a pall or altar cloth of
gold, delivered by the Master of the Great Wardrobe to the Lord Great
Chamberlain, and by him, kneeling, to His Majesty ; and an ingot or wedge of
gold of a pound weight which the Treasurer of the Household delivers to the
Lord Great Chamberlain and he to His Majesty, kneeling, who being uncovered,
delivers them to the Archbishop, and the Archbishop, standing (in which
posture he is to receive all other oblations), receives from him, one after another,
the pall, to be reverently laid upon the altar, and the gold, to be received into
the basin and with like reverence put upon the altar. Then the Queen ariseth
from her chair and, being likewise supported by two Bishops, and the Lords
which carry her Regalia going before her, goeth down to the altar and, kneel-
ing upon the cushion there laid for her on the left hand of the King's, maketh
her oblation, which is a pall, to be received also by the Archbishop and laid
upon the altar."
2 E <33
434 APPENDIX II
The reading of the Ten Commandments was also omitted from the Com-
munion Service, and likewise the Hallelujah Anthem, which had followed the
Homage, and the Final Prayer. The Litany was reduced by about one-half of
its length, the " Benediction " was curtailed in a manner which made it corre-
spond with earlier precedent, and the Coronation Oath was modified by the
omission of all reference to the now disestablished Church of Ireland. There
were also alterations made in the singing of certain anthems, which were
arranged to be sung while other parts of the ceremonial were in progress.
The greatest saving of time was that effected in the Homage of the Peers.
According to the old practice every peer, one by one in order, put off their
coronets singly, and, ascending the Throne, stretched forth their hands and
touched the crown on the sovereign's head, and then every one of them kissed
him on the cheek. The personal act of homage was now limited to the senior
peer of each degree.
After the King's illness, in order to spare His Majesty fatigue, the Form and
Order was further abbreviated, as shown below. The chief abbreviations were
(i) the omission of the Litany, which was sung in St Edward's Chapel at the
time of the consecration of the Holy Oil, before the arrival of the sovereigns,
as mentioned in the text of this work, (2) the suppression of the Sermon, and
(3) the removal of the Te Deum to the end of the service, during the Recess.
The following text is that of the Form and Order drawn up for use on June 26.
The portions omitted on August 9 are put within brackets ; and where other
alterations were made, which can not be so expressed, they are indicated by a
note.
It was only on the eve of the deferred Coronation that the second abbreviated
form was settled, and a few copies were printed for the use of the King and
Queen and for the officiating prelates. The Archbishop's copy reached Lambeth
Palace in a thin blue paper cover, on which was printed " Private. The Corona-
tion Service, Westminster Abbey, August 9, 1902," and on the title-page again
is printed " Private. Copy for Special Use."
THE FORM AND ORDER OF THEIR
MAJESTIES' CORONATION.
SECT. I. — THE PREPARATION.
In the morning upon the day of the Coronation early, care is to be taken that
the Ampulla be filled -with Oil and, together with the Spoon, be laid
ready upon the Altar in the Abbey-Church.
The Archbishops and Bishops Assistant being already vested in their Copes,
the Procession shall be formed immediately outside of the West Door of
the Church, and shall wait till notice is given of the approach of their
Majesties^ and shall then begin to move into the Church.
APPENDIX II 435
SECT. II. — THE ENTRANCE INTO THE CHURCH.1
The King and Queen, \as soon as they enter at the West Door of the Church^
are to be received with the following Anthem, to be sung by the Choir
of Westminster.
ANTHEM.
I was glad when they said unto me, We will go into the house of the
Lord. Our feet shall stand in thy gates, O Jerusalem. Jerusalem is built
as a city that is at unity in itself. O pray for the peace of Jerusalem : they
shall prosper that love thee. Peace be within thy walls, and plenteousness
within thy palaces.
The King and the Queen in the mean time pass up through the Body of the
Church, into and through the Choir, and so up the stairs to the Theatre;
ind having passed by their Thrones? they make their humble adoration,
' the F *
_ rayers
but in their Chairs before, and below, their Thrones.]
r.tiey
and then kneeling at the Faldstools set for them before their Chairs, use
some short private prayers; and after, sit down, [not in their Thrones,
SECT. III. — THE RECOGNITION.
The King and Queen being so placed, the Archbishop [turneth to the East part of
the Theatre, and after, together with the Lord Chancellor, Lord Great Chamberlain, Lord High
Constable and Earl Marshal (Garter King of Arms preceding them), goes to the other three sides
of the Theatre in this orde', South, West, and North, and at every of the four sides'] with a
loud voice speaks to the People : And the King in the mean while, standing
up by his Chair, turns and shews himself unto the People \a.t every of the
four sides of the Theatre, as the Archbishop is at every of them, and while he siieaks thus to the
People .] 3
Sirs, I here present unto you King EDWARD, the Undoubted King of this
Realm : Wherefore All you who are come this day to do your Homage, Are
you willing to do the same ?
The People signify their willingness and joy, by loud and repeated acclamations,
all with one voice crying out,
God save King EDWARD.
Then the Trumpets sound.
[ The Bible, Paten and Chalice are brought by the Bishops who fiad borne them,
and placed upon tfte Altar.~\
1 The Special Form printed for the Ceremony of August 9, 1902, commences at this
place. The sectionsare not numbered in it, but these have been retained from the Form
settled for June z6. All the parts of the service which were omitted on August 9 are
printed within brackets thus [ ], as also those parts of the rubric which are left out of
the Special Form. Some of the latter omissions are of no significance, e.g., that which
occurs in the first rubric of Sect. II.
2 In the Special Form are here added the words " The King removing his Cap, and
handing it to the Lord Great Chamberlain."
3 In the Special Form the rubric ends with the words "The Archbishop saying."
436 APPENDIX II
[The King and Queen go to tfteir Chairs set for them on the south side of the
Altar, where they are to kneel at their Faldstools when the Litany begins.
SECT. IV. — The Litany.
The Noblemen who carry in procession the Regalia, except those who carry the
Swords, come near to the Altar, and present in order every one what he
carries to the Archbishop, who delivers them to the Dean of Westminster, to
be by him placed upon the Altar, and then retire to the places appointed for
tJiem.
Then followeth the Litany, to be sung by two Bishops, vested in Copes, and
kneeling at a Faldstool above the steps of the TJteatre, on the middle of the
east side thereof, the Choir singing the responses to the Organ.
The Bishops who have sung the Litany resume their places."\ L
SECT. V. — THE BEGINNING OF THE COMMUNION SERVICE.
The Introit.
salm v. 2. O hearken thou unto the voice of my calling, my King, and my God : for
unto thee will I make my prayer.
Then the Archbishop beginneth the Communion Service.
Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy Name, Thy kingdom
come, Thy will be done, In earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily
bread ; And forgive us our trespasses, As we forgive them that trespass against
us ; And lead us not into temptation, But deliver us from evil. Amen.
Almighty God, unto whom all hearts be open, all desires known, and from
whom no secrets are hid : Cleanse the thoughts of our hearts by the inspiration
of thy Holy Spirit, that we may perfectly love thee, and worthily magnify thy
holy Name ; through Christ our Lord. Amen.
0 God, who provides! for thy people by thy power, and rulest over them in
love : Grant unto this thy servant EDWARD, our King,2 the Spirit of wisdom
and government:, that being devoted unto thee with all his heart, he may so
wisely govern this kingdom, that in his time thy Church and people may con-
tinue in safety and prosperity ; and that, persevering in good works unto the
end, he may through thy mercy come to thine everlasting kingdom ; through
Jesus Christ thy Son our Lord. Amen.
The Epistle, .
To be read by one of the Bishops.
i S. Pet. ii. 13.
Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake : whether
it be to the king as supreme ; or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by
1 The Litany omitted here, was sung as described in Book IV. c. 5, before the
regalia was carried to the West Door. In the Special Form, at this place, the rubric
says " His Majesty will sit down."
2 In the Archbishop's copy of the Special Form in the Library at Lambeth, after
•' Edward our King " are interpolated the words, in Dr Temple's own handwriting, " For
whose recovery we now give thee heartfelt thanks."
APPENDIX II 437
him for the punishment of evil-doers, and for the praise of them that do well.
For so is the will of God, that with well-doing ye may put to silence the
ignorance of foolish men : As free, and not using your liberty for a cloke of
maliciousness, but as the servants of God. Honour all men. Love the
brotherhood. Fear God. Honour the king.
The Gospel.
To be read by another Bishop, the King and Queen with the people standing.
S. Matth. xxii. 15.
Then went the Pharisees and took counsel how they might entangle him in
his talk. And they sent out unto him their disciples, with the Herodians,
saying, Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in
truth, neither carest thou for any man : for thou regardest not the person of
men. Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto
Caesar, or not ? But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt
ye me, ye hypocrites? shew me the tribute-money. And they brought unto
him a penny. And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription ?
They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto
Caesar the things which are Caesar's : and unto God the things that are God's.
When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and went their
way.
Then followeth the Nicene Creed, the King and Queen with the people standing,
as before.
I believe in one God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, And
of all things visible and invisible :
And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, Begotten of
his Father before all worlds, God of God, Light of Light, Very God of very
God, Begotten, not made. Being of one substance with the Father, By whom
all things were made : Who for us men and for our salvation came down from
heaven, And was incarnate by the Holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary, And was
made man, And was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate. He suffered
and was buried, And the third day he rose again according to the Scriptures,
And ascended into heaven, And sitteth on the right hand of the Father. And
he shall come again with glory to judge both the quick and the dead : Whose
kingdom shall have no end.
And I believe in the Holy Ghost, The Lord, and Giver of life, Who pro-
ceedeth from the Father and the Son, Who with the Father and the Son
together is worshipped and glorified, Who spake by the Prophets. And I
believe one Catholick and Apostolick Church. I acknowledge one Baptism for
the remission of sins. And I look for the resurrection of the dead, And the life
of the world to come. Amen.
[SECT. VI.— The Sermon.1
At the end of the Creed one of the Bishops is ready in the Pulpit, placed against the pillar at the
north-east corner of the Theatre, and begins the Sermon, which is to be short, and suitable to the
great occasion ; which the King and Queen hear sitting in their respective Chairs on the south aide
of the Altar, over against the Pulpit.
Section VI. The Sermon with its accompanying ceremonial was omitted.
438
APPENDIX II
And whereas the King was uncovered during the saying of the Litany and the beginning of the Com-
munion Service ; when the Sermon begins he puts on his Cap of crimson velvet turned up with
ermins, and so continues to the end of it.
On his right hand stands the Bishop of Durham, and beyond him, on the same side, the Lords that
carry the Swords ; On his left hand the Bishop of Bath and Wells, and the Lora Great Chan.ber-
lain.
The two Bishops that support the Queen stand on either side of her. And the Lady that bears up the
Train, and her Assistants, constantly attend her Majesty during the whole solemnity.
On the north side of the Altar sits the Archbishop in a purple velvet Chair, and near to him the Arch-
bishop of York ; and the other Bishops along the > orth side of the wall, betwixt him and the
Pulpit. Near the Archbishop stands Sorter King of Armi : On the south side, east of the King's
Chair, nearer to the Altar, are the Dean of Westminster, the rest of the Bishops, who bear any
part in the Service, ana the Prebendaries of Westminster.]
SECT. VII.— THE OATH.
[The Sermon being ended, and his Majesty having on Thursday, the 14th day of February, 1901, in the
presence of the Two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration,] the Archbishop^
goeth to the King, and standing before htm, administers the Coronation Oath,
first asking the King,
Sir, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath ?
And the King answering,
I am willing.
The Archbishop ministereth these questions; and the King, having a book in
his hands? answers each Question severally as follows.
Archb. Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the People of this
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and the Dominions thereto
belonging, according to the Statutes in Parliament agreed on, and the respective
Laws and Customs of the same ?
King. I solemnly promise so to do.
Archb. Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be
executed in all your Judgments ?
King. I will.
Archb. Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God,
the true Profession of the Gospel, and the Protestant Reformed Religion estab-
lished by Law? And will you maintain and preserve inviolably the Settlement
of the Church of England, and the Doctrine, Worship, Discipline, and Govern-
ment thereof, as by Law established in England? And will you preserve unto
the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Church therein committed to
their charge, all such Rights and Privileges, as by Law do or shall appertain
to them, or any of them ?
King. All this I promise to do.
Then the King arising out of his Chair? [supported as before, and assisted by the Lord
Qreat Chamberlain, the Sword of State carried before him\ shall [go to the Altar, and there
being uncovered,} make his Solemn Oath in the sight of all the People, to observe
the Premisses : Laying his right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the Great
Bible, which is now brought from the Altar by the Archbishop, [and tendered to him
as he kneels upon the steps,} saying these words :
1 In the Special Form, "the Archbishop then goeth to the King, who is seated in
his Chair."
2 In the Special Form, after ''hands," and " remaining seated."
8 In the Special Form, after " Chair," " and kneeling at his faldstool."
APPENDIX II 439
The things which I have here before promised, I will perform, and keep.
So help me God.
Then the King kisseth the Book, and signet h the Oath. And a Silver
Standish.
SECT. VIII. — THE ANOINTING.
The King having thus taken his Oath,1 [returns again to his Chair j and both he
and the Queen kneeling at their Paldstools^ the Archbishop beginneth the
Hymn, Veni, Creator Spiritus, and the Choir singeth it out.
HYMN.
Come. Holy Ghost, our souls inspire,
And lighten with celestial fire.
Thou the anointing Spirit art,
Who dost thy seven-fold gifts impart.
Thy blessed Unction from above
Is comfort, life, and fire of love.
Enable with perpetual light
The dulness of our blinded sight :
Anoint and cheer our soiled face
With the abundance of thy grace :
Keep far our foes, give peace at home ;
Where thou art guide no ill can come
Teach us to know the Father, Son,
And thee, of both, to be but one ;
That, through the ages all along,
This may be our endless song :
Praise to thy eternal merit,
Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
This being ended, the Archbishop saith this Prayer :
O Lord, Holy Father, who by anointing with Oil didst of old make and con-
secrate kings, priests, and prophets, to teach and govern thy people Israel : Bless
and sanctify thy chosen servant EDWARD, who by our office and ministry is
Here the Arch- now to be anointed with this Oil, and consecrated King of this
bishop lays his hand Realm : Strengthen him, O Lord, with the Holy Ghost the
upon the Ampulla. Comforter ; Confirm and stablish him with thy free and princely
Spirit, the Spirit of wisdom and government, the Spirit of counsel and ghostly
strength, the Spirit of knowledge and true godliness, and fill him, O Lord, with
the Spirit of thy holy fear, now and for ever. Amen.
This Prayer being ended, the Choir singeth :
ANTHEM.
Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet anointed Solomon king ; and all i Kings i. 39, 40
the people rejoiced and said : God save the king, Long live the king, May the
king live for ever. Amen. Hallelujah.
In the Special Form, instead of the words in bracket, " and being again seated."
440 APPENDIX II
In the mean time, the King [rising from his devotions} having l been disrobed of his
Crimson Robes by the Lord Great Chamberlain [and having taken off his Cap of
State, goes before the Altar, supported and attended as before.
The King\ sits down in King Edward's Chair (placed in the midst of the Area
over against the Altar, with a Faldstool before if), wherein he is to be
anointed. Four Knights of the Garter (summoned by Garter King of
Arms) hold over him a rich Pall of Silk, or Cloth of Gold, delivered to
them by the Lord Chamberlain : The Dean of Westminster,2 taking- the
Ampulla and Spoon from off the Altar, holdeth them ready, pouring some
of the Holy Oil into the Spoon, and with it the Archbishop anointeth the
King in the form of a cross?
1. On the Crown of the Head, saying,
Be thy Head anointed with Holy Oil, as kings, priests, and prophets were
anointed.
2. On the breast, saying,
Be thy Breast anointed with Holy Oil.
3. On the Palms of both the Hands, saying,
Be thy Hands anointed with Holy Oil :
And as Solomon was anointed king by Zadok the priest and Nathan the
prophet, so be you anointed, blessed, and consecrated King over this People,
whom the Lord your God hath given you to rule and govern, In the Name of
the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.
Then the Dean #/" Westminster layeth the Ampulla and Spoon upon the Altar
[and the King hneeleth down at the Faldstool] and the Archbishop, standing, saith
this Prayer or Blessing over [him .-] the King* his Majesty remaining seated:
Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who by his Father was anointed with
the Oil of gladness above his fellows, by his Holy Anointing pour down upon
your Head and Heart the blessing of the Holy Ghost, and prosper the works of
your Hands : that by the assistance of his heavenly grace you may preserve the
people committed to your charge in wealth, peace, and godliness ; and after
a long and glorious course of ruling this temporal kingdom wisely, justly, and
religiously, you may at last be made partaker of an eternal kingdom, through
the merits of Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
1 In the Special Form, after "having" are the words "during the Anthem."
2 Except in one place, which will be indicated, all the functions attributed by the
rubric to the Dean of Westminster, were on account of his infirmity performed by the
sub-Dean, Canon Duckworth.
8 The Bishop of Bath and Wells, who supported the King during the Ceremony, tells
me, as a fact interesting to note, that the Archbishop applied the consecrating oil to the
King's forehead with the right hand thumb, not with the finger. The anointing on
the breast was a return to earlier usage which had been omitted for William IV. and
for Queen Victoria.
4 In the Special Form the words "the King" are added in consequent j of their
omission in the previous line.
APPENDIX II 441
This Prayer being ended, the King arises [and resumes his seat in King Edward's Chair,]
•while the Knights of the Garter give back the Pall to the Lord Chamberlain;
[whereupon the King again arising,] the Dean of 'Westminster pu ts upon his Majesty
the Colobium Sindonis and the Supertunica or Close Pall of Cloth of Gold,
together with a Girdle of the same. The King then sits down.
SECT. IX.— THE PRESENTING OF THE SPURS AND SWORD, AND THE
GIRDING AND OBLATION OF THE SAID SWORD.
The Spurs are brought from the Altar by the Dean #/" Westminster, and delivered The Spurs.
to the Lord Great Chamberlain, who, kneeling down, touches his Majesty's
heels therewith, and sends them back to the Altar.
Then the Lord, who carries the Sword of State, delivering the said Sword to the The Sword of
Lord Chamberlain (which is thereupon deposited in the Traverse in Saint State returned>
Edward's Chapel], he receives from the Lord Chamberlain, in lieu thereof,
another Sword, in a Scabbard #/ Purple Velvet, provided for the King to be Another Sword
girt withal, which he delivereth to the Archbishop; and the Archbishop, brougllt:
laying it on the Altar, saith the following Prayer :
Hear our prayers, O Lord, we beseech thee, and so direct and support thy
servant King EDWARD, who is now to be girt with this Sword, that he may
not bear it in vain ; but may use it as the minister of God for the terror and
punishment of evil-doers, and for the protection and encouragement of those
that do well, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
Then the Archbishop takes the Sword from off the Altar, and (the Archbishop of
York and the Bishops of London and Winchester and other Bishops assist-
ing, and going along with hint) delivers it into the King's Right Hand, and Delivered to the
he holding it, the Archbishop saith : KinK :
Receive this Kingly Sword, brought now from the Altar of God, and delivered
to you by the hands of us the Bishops and servants of God, though unworthy.
1 \The King standing up, the Sword Is girt about him by the Lord Great Chamberlain;] and then,
[the King sitting downj\ the Archbishop saith : Girt about the
King.
With this Sword do justice, stop the growth of iniquity, protect the Holy
Church of God, help and defend widows and orphans, restore the things that
are gone to decay, maintain the things that are restored, punish and reform
what is amiss, and confirm what is in good order : that doing these things you
may be glorious in all virtue ; and so faithfully serve our Lord Jesus Christ in
this life, that you may reign for ever with him in the life which is to come.
1 The rubric in the Special Form runs " The Sword is girt about the King by the
Lord Great Chamberlain," and a footnote is appended, "This will not be actually done.
The King will remain seated." But the girding was performed, though the King
remained seated. This was a return to earlier usuage, William IV. not having been girt.
442
APPENDIX II
Then the King^rising up,] ungirds his Sword, and [going to the Altar, offers it there in
the Scabbard, and then returns and sits down in King Edward's Chair ;] giveth it to the
Archbishop to be placed upon tJte Altar, and the Peer, -who first received the
Sword, offereth the price of it, and having thus redeemed it, receive th it from
tJie Dean of Westminster, from off the Altar, and draweth it out of the
Scabbard, and carries it naked before his Majesty during the rest of the
solemnity.
e Bishops who had assisted during the offering return to their places."^
SECT. X. — THE INVESTING WITH THE ARMILLA AND IMPERIAL
MANTLE, AND THE DELIVERY OF THE ORB.
Then the King arising, the Armilla and Imperial Mantle 0rPall of Cloth of Gold,
are by the Master of the Robes delivered to the Dean of Westminster, and by
him put upon the King, standing; the Lord Great Chamberlain fastening
the Clasps : The King sits down, and then the Orb with the Cross is brought
from the Altar by the Dean of Westminster, and delivered into the King's
hand by the Archbishop, pronouncing this Blessing and Exhortation :
Receive this Imperial Robe, and Orb ; and the Lord your God endue you
with knowledge and wisdom, with majesty and with power from on high ; the
Lord cloath you with the Robe of Righteousness, and with the garments of
salvation. And when you see this Orb set under the Cross, remember that the
whole world is subject to the Power and Empire of Christ our Redeemer.
The King delivers his Orb to the Dean of Westminster, to be by him laid on the
Altar.
SECT. XL— THE INVESTITURE PER ANNULUM ET BACVLUM.
Then the Officer of the Jewel House delivers the Kings Ring to the Archbishop,
in which a Table Jewel is enchased; the Archbishop puts it on the Fourth
Finger of his Majesty's Right Hand, and saith,
Receive this Ring, the ensign of Kingly Dignity, and of Defence of the
Catholic Faith ; and as you are this day solemnly invested in the government
of this earthly kingdom, so may you be sealed with that Spirit of promise, which
is the earnest of an heavenly inheritance, and reign with him who is the blessed
and only Potentate, to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.
Then the Dean of Westminster brings the Sceptre with the Cross and the Sceptre
with the Dove to the Archbishop.
The Glove, presented by the Lord of the Manor of Worksop, being put on, the
Archbishop delivers the Sceptre with the Cross into the King's Right Hand,
saying,
Receive the Royal Sceptre, the ensign of Kingly Power and Justice.
And then he delivers the Sceptre with the Dove into the King's Left Hand, and
saith,
APPENDIX II 443
Receive the Rod of Equity and Mercy : and God, from whom all holy desires,
all good counsels, and all just works do proceed, direct and assist you in the
administration and exercise of all those powers which he hath given you. Be
so merciful that you be not too remiss ; so execute Justice that you forget not
Mercy. Punish the wicked, protect and cherish the just, and lead your people
in the way wherein they should go.
\The Lord of the Manor of Worksop supports his Majesty's Right Arm-]
SECT. XII. — THE PUTTING ON OF THE CROWN.
The Archbishop, standing before the Altar, taketh the Crown into his hands, and .
laying it again before him upon the Altar, saith : Crown7i"
O God, the Crown of the faithful : Bless we beseech thee and sanctify
Here the King th's ^ servant EDWARD our King : and as thou dost
must be put in this day set a Crown of pure Gold upon his Head, so
»iind to bow his enrich his Royal Heart with thine abundant grace, and crown
him with all princely virtues, through the King Eternal Jesus
Christ our Lord. Amen.
Then\the King sitting down in King Edward's C/ia/>,]2 the Archbishop, assisted with other
Bishops, comes from the Altar j the Dean 0/ Westminster brings the Crown, The Kin
and the Archbishop taking it of him reverently putteth it upon the King's Crownedf
Head? At the sight whereof the People, with loud and repeated shouts, cry,
God save the King ; the Peers and the Kings of Arms put on their
Coronets ; and the Trumpets sound, and by a Signal given, the great Guns
at the Tower are shot off.
The Acclamation ceasing, the Archbishop goeth on, and saith :
Be strong and of a good courage : Observe the commandments of God, and
walk in his holy ways : Fight the good fight of faith, and lay hold on eternal
life ; that in this world you may be crowned with success and honour, and
when you have finished your course, receive a Crown of Righteousness, which
God the righteous Judge shall give you in that day.
Then the Choir singeth :
Be strong and play the man : Keep the commandments of the Lord thy
God, and walk in his ways.
SECT. XIII. — THE PRESENTING OF THE HOLY BIBLE.
Then shall the Dean of Westminster take the Holy Bible/row off the Altar, andlfo Bible.
deliver it to the Archbishop, who shall present it to the King, first saying
these words to him :
1 The King was crowned with the Imperial Crown, not with St Edward's Crown (see
Book IV. c. 6). The marginal notes do not appear in the Special Form.
2 The King had previously taken his seat in the Coronation Chair.
3 In the Special Form, the words " the King being seated " are added here.
444 APPENDIX II
Our Gracious King ; we present you with this Book, the most valuable thing
that this world affords. Here is Wisdom ; This is the Royal Law ; These are
the lively Oracles of God.
Then the King, touching the Bible,1 delivers it back [delivers back the Bible\ to the
Archbishop, who gives it to the Dean of Westminster, to be reverently placed
again upon the Holy Altar ; and the Archbishops and Bishops return to
their places.
SECT. XIV. — THE BENEDICTIONS [AND THE TE DEUM.]
And now the King having been thus anointed and crowned, and having received
all the Ensigns of Royalty, the Archbishop solemnly blesseth him : And all
the Bishops^ with the rest of the Peers, follow every part of the Benediction
with a loud and hearty Amen.
The Lord bless you and keep you : and as he hath made you King over his
people, so may he prosper you in this world, and make you partake of his
eternal felicity in the world to come. Atnen.
The Lord give you a fruitful Country and healthful Seasons ; victorious
Fleets and Armies, and a quiet Empire ; a faithful Senate, wise and upright
Counsellors and Magistrates, a loyal Nobility, and a dutiful Gentry : a pious
and learned and useful Clergy ; an honest, industrious, and obedient
Commonality. Amen.
Then the Archbishop turneth to the People, and saith :
And the same Lord God Almighty grant, that the Clergy and Nobles
assembled here for this great and solemn Service, and together with them all
the People of the land, fearing God, and honouring the King, may by the
merciful superintendency of the divine Providence, and the vigilant care of our
gracious Sovereign, continually enjoy peace, plenty, and prosperity ; through
Jesus Christ our Lord, to whom, with the Eternal Father, and God the Holy
Ghost, be glory in the Church, world without end. Amen.
\Then the Choir begins to sing the Te Deum, and the King goes to the Chair on which his Majesty
first sate, on the east side of the Throne, the two Bishops his Supporters, the Great Officers, and
other Peers attending him, every one in his place, the Swords being carried before him ; and there
he aits down.
TE DEUM LAUD AMU S.
We praise thee, O God : we acknowledge thee to be the Lord.
All the earth doth worship thee : the Father everlasting.
To thee all Angels cry aloud : the heavens and all the powers therein.
To thee Cherubin and Seraphin : continually do cry,
Holy, Holy, Holy : Lord God of Sabaoth :
Heaven and earth are full of the majesty : of thy glory.
1 The words " touching the Bible" are found only in the Special Form.
2 In the Special Form the Te Deum is transferred to the Recess, being sung when, at
the close of the Service, their Majesties had retired to their Traverses in St Edward's
Chapel.
APPENDIX II 445
The glorious company of the Apostles : praise thee.
The goodly fellowship of the Prophets : praise thee.
The noble army of Martyrs : praise thee.
The holy Church throughout all the world : doth acknowledge thee ;
The Father : of an infinite majesty ;
Thine honourable, true : and only Son ;
Also the Holy Ghost : the Comforter.
Thou art the King of Glory : O Christ.
Thou art the everlasting Son : of the Father.
When thou tookest upon thee to deliver man : thou didst not abhor the
Virgin's womb.
When thou hadst overcome the sharpness of death : thou didst open the
kingdom of heaven to all believers.
Thou sittest at the right hand of God : in the glory of the Father.
We believe that thou shall come : to be our Judge.
We therefore pray thee, help thy servants : whom thou hast redeemed with
thy precious blood.
Make them to be numbered with thy Saints : in glory everlasting.
O Lord, save thy people : and bless thine heritage.
Govern them : and lift them up for ever.
Day by day : we magnify thee ;
And we worship thy Name : ever world without end.
Vouchsafe, O Lord : to keep us this day without sin.
O Lord, have mercy upon us : have mercy upon us.
O Lord, let thy mercy lighten upon us : as our trust is in thee.
0 Lord, in thee have I trusted : let me never be confounded.]
SECT. XV. — THE INTHRONIZATION.
[The Te Deum being ended, The King is lifted up into his Throne\ l ( The King then
passes to his throne and is lifted up into if) by the Archbishops and Bishops,
and other Peers of the Kingdom j and being Inthronized, or placed therein,
(and sitting down) all the Great Officers, those that bear the Swords and the
Sceptres, and the Nobles who had borne the otfier Regalia, stand round about
the steps of the Throne ; and the Archbishop standing before the King, saith :
Stand firm, and hold fast from henceforth the Seat and State of Royal and
Imperial Dignity, which is this day delivered unto you, in the Name and by the
authority of Almighty God, and by the hands of us the Bishops and servants of
God, though unworthy : And as you see us to approach nearer to God's Altar,
so vouchsafe the more graciously to continue to us your Royal favour and protec-
tion. And the Lord God Almighty, whose Ministers we are, and the Stewards
of his Mysteries, establish your Throne in righteousness, that it may stand
fast for evermore, like as the sun before him, and as the faithful witness in
heaven. Amen.
SECT. XVI.— THE HOMAGE.
The Exhortation being ended, all tJie Princes and Peers then present do their The Homage.
Homage publicly and solemnly unto the King.
1 In the Special Form the rubric begins with the words "The King then passes to his
Throne," etc. In the fourth line the words "and sitting down" are found only in the
Special Form.
446 APPENDIX II
The Archbishop first kneels down before his Majesty's knees, and the rest of the
Bishops kneel in their places; and they do their Homage togetJter, for the
shortening of the ceremony, the Archbishop saying :
I Frederick Archbishop of Canterbury [And so every one of the rest, I N.
Bishop of N. repeating the rest audibly after the Archbishop] will be faithful
and true, and Faith and Truth will bear unto you our Sovereign Lord, and
your Heirs Kings of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. And
I will do, and truly acknowledge the Service of the Lands I claim to hold of
you, as in right of the Church.
So help me God.
Then the Archbishop arising kisseth the King's left Cheek.
Then the Prince of Wales, taking off his Coronet, kneels down before his
Majesty's knees, the rest of the Princes of the Blood Royal kneeling in their
places, taking off their Coronets, and pronouncing the words of Homage
after him, the Prince of Wales saying :
I N. Prince, or Duke, &c., of N. do become your Liege man of Life and
Limb, and of earthly worship, and Faith and Truth I will bear unto you, to
live and die, against all manner of Folks.
So help me God.
Then the [Princes of the Blood Royal arising severally touch] l (Prince of Wales
arising touches} the Crown on his Majesty's Head and kiss(es) his Majesty's
left Cheek. After which the other Peers of the Realm, who are tJien in
their seats, kneel down, put off" their Coronets, and do their Homage
[the Dukes first by themselves, and so the Marquesses, the Earls, the Viscounts, and the
Barons, severally in their places], the first of each Order kneeling before his
Majesty, [and the others of his Order who are near his Majesty, also kneeling
in their places, and all of his Order saying after him] (all saying together) :
I N. Duke, or Earl, &>c., of N. do become your Liege man of Life and
Limb, and of earthly worship, and Faith and Truth I will bear unto you, to
live and die, against all manner of Folks.
So help me God.
The Peers having done their Homage, the first of each Order [putting off his
Coronet, singly ascends the Throne again},2 rising and stretching forth his hand,
touches the Crown on his Majesty's Head, as promising by that Ceremony
for himself and his Order to be ever ready to support it with all their
power, and then kisseth the King's Cheek.
When the Princes and Peers are thus doing their Homage, the King, if he
thinks good, delivers his Sceptre with the Cross and the Sceptre or Rod
with the Dove, to some one near to the Blood Royal, or to the Lords that
carried them in the Procession, or to any other that he pleaseth to assign, to
hold them by him.
1 In the Special Form the rubric was altered, as above, so that only the Prince of
Wales touched the crown and kissed the King's left cheek.
2 In the Special Form the words within brackets being omitted, the word "rising" is
added.
APPENDIX II 447
And the Bishops that support the King in the Procession may also ease him, by
supporting the Crown, as there shall be occasion.
At the same time the Choir singe th this
Kings shall see and arise, princes also shall worship ; because of the Lord Isa. xlix. 7.
that is faithful, even the Holy One of Israel who hath chosen thee : That thou 9-
mayest say to the prisoners, Go forth : to them that are in darkness, Show
yourselves. For he that hath mercy on them shall lead them, even by the I0.
springs of water shall he guide them. And I will make all my mountains a „.
way, and my highways shall be exalted. Behold, these shall come from far ; I2.
and, lo, these from the north and from the west ; and these from the land of
Sinim.
When the Homage is ended, the Drums beat, and the Trumpets sound, and all
the People shout, crying out:
God save King EDWARD.
Long live King EDWARD.
May the King live for ever.
The solemnity of the King's Coronation being thus ended, the Archbishop leaves
the King in his Throne, and goes to his chair.
SECT. XVII. — THE QUEEN'S CORONATION, BY THE ARCHBISHOP OF YORK.
The Queen ariseth and goeth to the steps of the Altar, supported by two Bishops,
and there kneeleth down, whilst the Archbishop of York saith the following
Prayer :
Almighty God, the fountain of all goodness : Give ear, we beseech thee, to
our prayers, and multiply thy blessings upon this thy servant, whom in thy
Name, with all humble devotion, we consecrate our Queen ; Defend her
evermore from dangers, ghostly and bodily ; Make her a great example of
virtue and piety, and a blessing to this kingdom, through Jesus Christ our
Lord, who liveth and reigneth with thee, O Father, in the unity of the Holy
Spirit, world without end. Amen.
This Prayer being ended, the Queen ariseth, and cometh to the place of her
Anointing : Which is to be at a Faldstool set for that purpose before the The Anointing.
Altar, between the steps and King Edward's Chair. She kneeleth down,
and four Peeresses appointed for that service, and summoned by Garter x
King of Arms, holding a rich Pall of Cloth of Gold over her, the Arch-
bishop of York poureth the Holy Oil upon the Crown of her Head, saying
these words :
In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost : Let
the anointing with this Oil increase your honour, and the grace of God's Holy
Spirit establish you, for ever and ever. Amen.
1 Her Majesty was summoned by Norroy, King of Arms, in the absence of Garter.
448
APPENDIX II
Then the Archbishop of York receiveth from the Officer of the Jewel Office the
Queer? s Ring, and putteth it upon the Fourth Finger of her Right Hand,
saying :
Receive this Ring, the seal of a sincere Faith ; and God, to whom belongeth
all power and dignity, prosper you in this your honour, and grant you therein
long to continue, fearing him always, and always doing such things as shall
please him, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
Then the Archbishop of York taketh the Crown from off the Altar into his
hands, and reverently setteth it upon the Queerfs Head, saying:
Receive the Crown of glory, honour, and joy : And God the Crown of the
faithful, who by our Episcopal hands (though unworthy) doth this day set a
Crown of pure Gold upon your Head, enrich your Royal Heart with his Abundant
grace, and crown you with all princely virtues in this life, and with an ever-
lasting Crown of glory in the life which is to come, through Jesus Christ our
Lord. Amen.
The Queen being crowned all the Peeresses put on their Coronets.
Then the Archbishop of York putteth the Sceptre into the Queeris Right Hand,
and the Ivory Rod with the Dove into her Left Hand; and sayeth this
Prayer :
O Lord, the giver of all perfection : Grant unto this thy servant
ALEXANDRA our Queen, that by the powerful and mild influence of her piety
and virtue, she may adorn the high dignity which she hath obtained, through
Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
The Queen being thus Anointed, and Crowned, and having received all her
Ornaments, arise 'th and goeth from the Altar, supported by her two Bishops,
and so up to the Theatre. And as she passeth by the King on his Throne,
she boweth herself reverently to his Majesty, and then is conducted to her1
own Throne and without any further Ceremony taketh her place in it.
SECT. XVIII. — THE COMMUNION.
Then the Offertory begins, the Archbishop reading [these Sentences ;] this Sentence ,-2
Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and
glorify your Father which is in heaven.
^Charge them who are rich in this world, that they be ready to give, and glad to distribute ;
laying up in store for themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may
attain eternal life.]
1 His Majesty stood to receive the Queen's obeisance with one Sceptre in his hand.
The King asked the Bishop of Bath and Wells, who was in attendance to instruct him,
whether he should hold the two Sceptres or only one while he received the Queen's
obeisance. The Bishop, unaware of any precedent to guide him, suggested that only
one Sceptre should be held, and this was done.
2 Only one sentence was appointed in the Special Form.
APPENDIX II 449
TJten the Organ plays and the Choir sing :
Let my prayer come up into thy presence as incense : and let the lifting up of
my hands be as an evening sacrifice.
In the mean while the King and Queen deliver their Sceptres to the Noblemen who
had previously borne them, and descend from their Thrones, supported and
attended as before ; and go to [the steps of the Altar] (their Faldstools before
the Altar) where, taking off their Crowns, which they deliver to the Lord
Great Chamberlain and [other appointed Officer] (the King's Lord Chamber-
lain) ' to hold, they kneel down.
And first the King offers Bread and Wine for the Communion, which being The King offers
brought out of Saint Edward's Chapel, and delivered into his hands (the Br<
Bread upon the Paten by the Bishop that read the Epistle, and the Wine in
the Chalice by the Bishop that read the Gospel), are by the Archbishop received
from the King, and reverently placed upon the Altar, and decently covered
with a fair linen cloth, the Archbishop first saying this Prayer :
Bless, O Lord, we beseech thee, these thy gifts, and sanctify them unto this
holy use, that by them we may be made partakers of the Body and Blood of
thine only-begotten Son Jesus Christ, and fed unto everlasting life of soul and
body : And that thy servant King EDWARD may be enabled to the discharge
of his weighty office, whereunto of thy great goodness thou hast called and
appointed him. Grant this, O Lord, for Jesus Christ's sake, our only Mediator
and Advocate. Amen.
Then the King kneeling, as before, makes his Oblation, offering a Pall or Altar- A Pall or Altar-
cloth delivered by the Officer of the Great Wardrobe to the Lord Great cloth-
Chamberlain, and by him, kneeling, to his Majesty, and an Ingot or Wedge An ingot of
of Gold of a pound weight, which the Jreasurer of the Household delivers to Gold-
the Lord Great Chamberlain, and he to his Majesty ; And the Archbishop
coming to him, receiveth and placet h them upon the Altar.
The Queen also at the same time maketh her Oblation of a Pall or Altar-cloth, The Queen
and a Mark weight of Gold, in like manner as the King. offers.
Then the King and Queen [return to their Chairs, and kneel down at their Fald-
stools, and~\ 2 the Archbishop saith :
Let us pray for the whole state of Christ's Church militant here in earth.
Almighty and everliving God, who by thy holy Apostle hast taught us to make
prayers and supplications, and to give thanks, for all men : We humbly beseech
thee most mercifully to accept these oblations, and to receive these our prayers,
which we offer unto thy Divine Majesty ; beseeching thee to inspire continually
the universal Church with the spirit of truth, unity, and concord : And grant,
that all they that do confess thy holy Name may agree in the truth of thy holy
Word, and live in unity, and godly love. We beseech thee also to save and
1 Therewere two changes in the first part of this rubric. The words omitted in the Special
Form are within square brackets [] and those substituted are within round brackets ( ).
2 In the Special Form the rubric runs, "Then the King and Queen remaining at
their Faldstools or in their chairs, the Archbishop saith."
450 APPENDIX II
defend all Christian Kings, Princes, and Governours ; and specially thy servant
EDWARD our King ; that under him we may be godly and quietly governed :
And grant unto his whole Council, and to all that are put in authority under
him, that they may truly and indifferently minister justice, to the punishment of
wickedness and vice, and to the maintenance of thy true religion, and virtue. Give
grace, O heavenly Father, to all Bishops and Curates, that they may both by
their life and doctrine set forth thy true and lively Word, and rightly and duly
administer thy holy Sacraments : And to all thy people give thy heavenly grace ;
and specially 'to this congregation here present ; that, with meek heart and due
reverence, they may hear, and receive thy holy Word ; truly serving thee in
holiness and righteousness all the days of their life. And we most humbly
beseech thee of thy goodness, O Lord, to comfort and succour all them, who in
this transitory life are in trouble, sorrow, need, sickness, or any other adversity.
And we also bless thy holy Name for all thy servants departed this life in thy
faith and fear ; beseeching thee to give us grace so to follow their good examples,
that with them we may be partakers of thy heavenly kingdom : Grant this, O
Father, for Jesus Christ's sake, our only Mediator and Advocate. Amen.
The, Exhortation.
Ye that do truly and earnestly repent you of your sins, and are in love and
charity with your neighbours, and intend to lead a new life, following the com-
mandments of God, and walking from henceforth in his holy ways : Draw near
with faith, and take this holy Sacrament to your comfort ; and make your
humble confession to Almighty God, meekly kneeling upon your knees.
The General Confession.
Almighty God, Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Maker of all things, Judge
of all men : We acknowledge and bewail our manifold sins and wickedness,
Which we from time to time most grievously have committed, By thought,
word, and deed, Against thy Divine Majesty, Provoking most justly thy wrath
and indignation against us. We do earnestly repent, And are heartily sorry
for these our misdoings ; The remembrance of them is grievous unto us ; The
burden of them is intolerable. Have mercy upon us, Have mercy upon us,
most merciful Father ; For thy Son our Lord Jesus Christ's sake, Forgive us all
that is past ; And grant that we may ever hereafter Serve and please thee In
newness of life, To the honour and glory of thy Name ; Through Jesus Christ
our Lord. Amen.
The Absolution.
Almighty God, our heavenly Father, who of his great mercy hath promised
forgiveness of sins to all them that with hearty repentance and true faith turn
unto him ; Have mercy upon you ; pardon and deliver you from all your
sins ; confirm and strengthen you in all goodness ; and bring you to everlasting
life ; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
After which shall be said,
Hear what comfortable words our Saviour Christ saith unto all that truly
turn to him.
Come unto me, all that travail and are heavy laden, and I will refresh you.
APPENDIX II 451
So God loved the world, that he gave his only-begotten Son, to the end that
all that believe in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Hear also what Saint Paul saith.
This is a true saying, and worthy of all men to be received, that Christ Jesus
came into the world to save sinners.
Hear also what Saint John saith.
If any man sin, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the
righteous ; and he is the propitiation for our sins.
After which the A rchbishop shall proceed, saying,
Lift up your hearts.
Answer.
We lift them up unto the Lord.
Archbishop.
Let us give thanks unto our Lord God.
Answer.
It is meet and right so to do.
Then shall the Archbishop turn to the Lord's Table, and say,
It is very meet, right, and our bounden duty, that we should at all times,
and in all places, give thanks unto thee, O Lord, Holy Father, Almighty,
Everlasting God.
Therefore with Angels and Archangels, and with all the company of heaven,
we laud and magnify thy glorious Name ; evermore praising thee, and saying :
Holy, holy, holy, Lord God of hosts, heaven and earth are full of thy glory :
Glory be to thee, O Lord most high. Amen.
The Prayer of Humble Access.
We do not presume to come to this thy Table, O merciful Lord, trusting in
our own righteousness, but in thy manifold and great mercies. We are not
worthy so much as to gather up the crumbs under thy Table. But thou art the
same Lord, whose property is always to have mercy : Grant us therefore,
gracious Lord, so to eat the flesh of thy dear Son Jesus Christ, and to drink his
blood, that our sinful bodies may be made clean by his body, and our souls
washed through his most precious blood, and that we may evermore dwell in
him, and he in us. Amen.
The Prayer of Consecration.
Almighty God, our heavenly Father, who of thy tender mercy didst give
452 APPENDIX II
thine only Son Jesus Christ to suffer death upon the Cross for our redemption ;
who made there (by his one oblation of himself once offered) a full, perfect, and
•.Here the Arch- sufficient sacrifice, oblation, and satisfaction for the sins of
bishop is to take the whole world ; and did institute, and in his holy Gospel
*}? ha^d* int° command us to continue, a perpetual memory of that his
precious death, until his coming again : Hear us, O most
oreak*thelBread°- merciml Father, we most humbly beseech thee ; and grant
that we receiving these thy creatures of bread and wine, accord-
iAlf^ ha^d to m^ to *ky Son our Saviour Jesus Christ's holy institution, in
all theBr'ead*'"1 remembrance of his death and passion, may be partakers of
his most blessed Body and Blood : who, in the same night
fake^he^Cu^int l^at ^e was Detrayed, a took Bread; and, when he had given
his^and" '" ° thanks, bhe brake it, and gave it to his disciples, saying,
e And here to Take, eat; c this is my Body which is given for you: Do
lay his hand upon this in remembrance of me. Likewise after supper dhe
ech?i?e"el (bpiU took the CuP ; and? when he had §iven thanks» he gave il:
son) in°T which to them, saying, Drink ye all of this ; for ethis is my Blood
there is any Wine of the New Testament, which is shed for you and for many
to be consecrated. for the remission of sins . Do thiS) as oft as ye shall drink
it, in remembrance of me. Amen,
When the Archbishops, and Dean of Westminster, [with the Bishops' Assistants,
namely, the Preacher, and those who read the Litany, and the Epistle and Gospel,] have
communicated in both kinds, the King and Queen shall [advance to the steps of
the Altar and] kneel down, and the Archbishop shall administer the Bread,
and the Dean ^/"Westminster the Cup, to them.1
At the Delivery of the Bread shall be said ;
The Body of our Lord Jesus Christ, which was given for thee, preserve thy
body and soul unto everlasting life : Take and eat this in remembrance that
Christ died for thee, and feed on him in thy heart by faith with thanksgiving.
At the Delivery of the Cup.
The Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, which was shed for thee, preserve thy
body and soul unto everlasting life : Drink this in remembrance that Christ's
Blood was shed for thee, and be thankful.
The King and Queen then put on their Crowns, and [taking] (take) the Sceptres
in their hands again, [repair to their Thrones.]2 (and remain in their chairs until
the Set vice is ended}.'1
Then the Archbishop goeth on to the Post-Communion, saying,
Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy Name, Thy kingdom
come, Thy will be done, In earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily
bread ; And forgive us our trespasses, As we forgive them that trespass against
us; And lead us not into temptation, But deliver us from evil. For thine is the
kingdom, the power, and the glory, For ever and ever. Amen.
1 This duty was performed by the Dean of Westminster himself, and not by the sub-
Dean. (See note, p. 440.)
2 In the Special Form the rubric was altered, as indicated, to spare the King fatigue.
APPENDIX II 453
Then this Prayer.
O Lord and heavenly Father, we thy humble servants entirely desire thy
fatherly goodness, mercifully to accept this our sacrifice of praise and thanks-
giving ; most humbly beseeching thee to grant, that by the merits and death of
thy Son Jesus Christ, and through faith in his blood, we and all thy whole
Church may obtain remission of our sins, and all other benefits of his passion.
And here we offer and present unto thee, O Lord, ourselves, our souls and
bodies, to be a reasonable, holy, and lively sacrifice unto thee ; humbly beseech-
ing thee, that all we, who are partakers of this holy Communion, may be ful-
filled with thy grace and heavenly benediction. And although we be unworthy,
through our manifold sins, to offer unto thee any sacrifice, yet we beseech thee
to accept this our bounden duty and service ; not weighing our merits, but
pardoning our offences, through Jesus Christ our Lord ; by whom, and with
whom, in the unity of the Holy Ghost, all honour and glory be unto thee, O
Father Almighty, world without end. Amen.
Then shall be sung;
Glory be to God on high, and in earth peace, good will towards men. We
praise thee, we bless thee, we worship thee, we glorify thee, we give thanks to
thee for thy great glory, O Lord God, heavenly King, God the Father Almighty.
0 Lord, the only begotten Son Jesu Christ ; O Lord God, Lamb of God.
Son of the Father, that takest away the sins of the world, have mercy upon us.
Thou that takest away the sins of the world, have mercy upon us. Thou that
takest away the sins of the world, receive our prayer. Thou that sittest at the
right hand of God the Father, have mercy upon us.
For thou only art holy ; thou only art the Lord ; thou only, O Christ, with
the Holy Ghost, art most high in the glory of God the Father. Amen.
Then the Archbishop saith,
The peace of God, which passeth all understanding, keep your hearts and
minds in the knowledge and love of God, and of his Son Jesus Christ our
Lord : And the blessing of God Almighty, the Father, the Son, and the Holy
Ghost, be amongst you, and remain with you always. Amen.
SECT. XIX.— THE RECESS.
The whole Coronation Office being thus performed, the King attended and ac- The Proceeding
companied as before, the four Swords being carried before him, [descends ^^war^s
from his Throne] Crowned, and carrying his Sceptre and Rod in his hands, Chapel :
[goes into the A rea eastward of the Theatre, and\ passes [on\ through the Door Of the Kin* :
on the South side of the Altar into Saint Edward's Chapel ; (Te Deum being
meanwhile sung},1 and as they pass by the Altar, the rest of the Regalia, lying
upon it, are to be delivered by the Dean of Westminster to the Lords that
carried them in the Procession, and so they proceed in State into the Chapel,
the Organ all the while playing. The Queen at the same time [descending^ of the Queen.
goes in like manner into the same Chapel at the Door on the North side
of the Altar; bearing her Sceptre in her Right Hand, and her Ivory Rod
in her Left.
1 The words " Te Deum being meanwhile sung" are added in the Special Form.
454 APPENDIX II
The King and Queen being come into the Chapel, the King standing before the
Altar, delivers the Sceptre with the Dove to the Archbishop, who layeth it
upon the Altar there. And the Golden Spurs and St Edward's Staff are
given into the hands of the Dean </ Westminster, and by him laid there also.
His Majesty will then be disrobed of his Imperial Mantle or Robe of State, and
arrayed in his Royal Robe of Purple Velvet, \and her Majesty will also be
arrayed in her Royal Robes of Purple Velvety^ His Majesty wearing his
Imperial Crown will then receive in his Left Hand the Orb from the
Archbishop.
Then their Majesties will proceed through the Choir to the West Door of the
Church, in the same way as they came, wearing tfteir Crowns : the King
bearing in his Right Hand the Sceptre with the Cross, and in his Left the
Orb ; the Queen bearing in her Right Hand her Sceptre with the Cross,
and in her Left the Ivory Rod with the Dove ; all Peers wearing their
Coronets.
1 The last part of this sentence, referring to the Queen, is omitted in the Special
Form ; but whether by accident or design it does not appear.
APPENDIX III
THE INDIAN CONTINGENT AT THE
CORONATION CEREMONY
THE following historical notes upon the Indian Corps, which furnished detach-
ments for the contingent sent to England to take part in the Coronation
ceremonies, have been drawn up for me by Lieutenant-Colonel The Honourable
Everard Baring, Military Secretary to the Viceroy.
Those who had the privilege of being present at the private inspection by
His Majesty of the Indian Contingent in the garden of Buckingham Palace
the week after the Coronation, could not help feeling that the significance of
the spectacle would have been more complete had they possessed some definite
knowledge of the services rendered to the Empire by the branches of the
Indian army there represented. I therefore asked Lord Hardwicke, the Under-
secretary of State for India, to see if he could obtain for me, some information
on the subject, from the department, before his departure to the War Office,
to which he had been transferred. Lord Hardwicke ascertained that practically
no detailed information on the subject existed in London ; but he was kind
enough to put me into communication with Colonel Baring who, in spite of
the great pressure of extra work which was devolving upon him in consequence
of the preparations for the Durbar, found time to supply me, in the most obliging
manner, with the following memorandum, which, containing a mass of informa-
tion never hitherto published, seems to me to form a historical document of
great value.
There is no need, therefore, to apologise for its introduction in this Appendix,
especially as the presence of the Indian troops in London during the period
of the Coronation was one of the most significant features of that great imperial
ceremony. The memorandum drawn up by the Military Secretary to the
Viceroy is inevitably succinct, for the events of which the mere names and
dates are given, recapitulate the entire history of the Indian Empire from the
days of Warren Hastings. But to any one familiar with the simple outline
of the story of the English in India, some of the briefest entries are most
eloquent. For example, the five words included in the record of services of
the 24th Baluchistan Infantry and of the ist Hyderabad Lancers, "the pursuit
of Tantia Topi," recall one of the most dramatic pages of our imperial history
— the treachery of Nana Sahib, the well at Cawnpore, the arrival of Havelock
too late, and the unwavering loyalty of some of the native forces without which
our Indian Empire would have 'been lost.
This catalogue of dates and events is appropriately placed at the end of a
work which celebrates the consecration of the imperial idea. For it indicates
455
456 APPENDIX III
a fact too often lost sight of by a generation which is perhaps too complacent
in its imperialism. This unadorned record shows that the British Empire is
not the creation of yesterday. The warlike achievements of the native troops
of India for a hundred and thirty years is the record during that period not only
of bravery in the field but of self-denial and wisdom practised by generation
after generation of British officers and civilians who have organised the Indian
army and administered that vast domain.
MEMORANDUM REGARDING INDIAN CORPS FROM WHICH REPRESENTATIVE DETACH-
MENTS WERE FURNISHED FOR THE CONTINGENT SENT TO ENGLAND IN 1902 TO TAKE
PART IN THE CORONATION CEREMONIES.
The following Corps were represented in the Indian contingent sent to England in 1902
to take part in the Coronation ceremonies : —
The Governor General's Body-Guard.
The ist Bengal Lancers — composed entirely of Hindustani Mahomedans.
The loth Bengal Lancers — composed of Sikhs, Dogras, Punjabi Mahomedans and
Pathans. Class represented— Sikhs.
The nth Bengal Lancers, of composition similar to that of the roth. Class represented—
Dogras.
The I4th Bengal Lancers, composed entirely of Jats.
The I5th Bengal Lancers, composed of Multani Pathans and Derajat and Cis-Indus
Mahomedans. Class represented— Multani Pathans.
The i8th Bengal Lancers, composed of Punjabi Mahomedans and Sikhs. Class
represented — Punjabi Mahomedans.
The Cavalry of the Corps of Guides, composed of Sikhs, Dogras, Punjabi Mahomedans
and Pathans. Class represented — Pathans.
The Kohat Mountain Battery.
The Derajat Mountain Battery.
The Peshawar Mountain Battery.
The Hazara Mountain Battery.
The Quetta Mountain Battery.
The Jullunder Mountain Battery.
The Gujerat Mountain Battery.
The Lahore Mountain Battery.
The Murree Mountain Battery.
The Abbottabad Mountain Battery.1
The Bengal Sappers and Miners, composed of Sikhs, Punjabi Mahomedans, Pathans and
Hindustani Brahmans, Rajputs, Jats and Mahomedans. Classes represented— ML
The ist Brahman Infantry.
The 7th Rajput Infantry.
The loth Jat Infantry.
The 1 5th Sikh Infantry. Class represented— Jat Sikhs.
The I7th Mahomedan Rajput Infantry. Class represented — Hindustani Mahomedans.
The aoth Punjab Infantry, composed of Pathans, Sikhs and Dogras. Class represented
— Pathans, not being Afridis.
The 23rd Punjab Pioneers, composed of Mazbi Sikhs.
The 33rd Punjab Infantry, composed of Punjabi Mahomedans, Pathans (Bunerwals,
Swatis and Bajauris) and Sikhs. Class represented— Punjabi Mahomedans.
The 3810 Dogra Infantry.
The 39th Garhwal Rifles, composed entirely of Garhwalis.
The and Gurkha Rifles.
The ist Punjab Infantry, Punjab Frontier Force, composed of Sikhs, Dogras, Punjabi
Mahomedans and Pathans (Afridis, Yusafzais and Khattaks). Class represented — Afridis.
1 N.B.— All these Mountain Batteries are composed mainly of Sikhs and Punjabi Mahomedans, in
about equal numbers.
APPENDIX III 457
THE BODY-GUARD OF THE GOVERNOR OF MADRAS.
The ist Madras Lancers, composed of Madras Mahomedans, but has a troop of
Mahrattas. Class represented — Madras Mahomedans.
The Madras Sappers and Miners, composed of Madras Hindus of various classes (in-
cluding Tamils, Telingas and Telugus), Madras Mahomedans and Native Christians.
Classes represented — All.
The ist Madras Pioneers, composed of Madras Mahomedans, Tamils, Telingas, Native
Christians, etc. Class represented — Tamils.
The 2oth Madras Infantry, composed of Madras Mahomedans, Tamils, Telingas, etc.
Class represented — Madras Mahomedans.
The 2nd Battalion Moplah Rifles, composed entirely of Moplahs.
THE BODY-GUARD OF THE GOVERNOR OF BOMBAY, composed of Sikhs and Rajputana
Mahomedans. Classes represented— All.
The ist Bombay Lancers, composed of Dakhani Mahrattas, Jats, Sikhs and Pathans.
Class represented — Mahrattas.
The 3rd Bombay Cavalry, composed of Jats, Sikhs, Kaimkhanies and Mahomedan
Rajputs. Class represented — Rajputs.
The Bombay Sappers and Miners, composed of Dakhani, Hindustani and Punjabi
Mahomedans, Mahrattas, Rajputs, Hindustani Hindus and Sikhs. Classes represented— All.
The ist Bombay Grenadiers, composed of Mahrattas, Punjabi Mahomedans, and
Mahomedans of Rajputana and Central India. Class represented — Dakhani Mahrattas.
The 3rd Bombay Infantry, composed of Mahrattas and Bombay Mahomedans. Class
represented — Konkani Mahrattas.
The 24th Baluchistan Infantry, composed of Hazaras, Khattaks, Mahsud Waziris,
Punjabi Mahomedans and Sikhs. Class represented— Hazaras.
The 29th Baluch Infantry, composed of North-West Frontier Pathans, Punjabi
Mahomedans and Hill Baluchis. Class represented — Baluchis.
The ist Lancers, Hyderabad Contingent, composed of Sikhs, Dakhani Mahomedans and
Jats. Class represented — -Dakhani Mahomedans.
ist Infantry, Hyderabad Contingent, composed of Rajputs, Dakhani Mahomedans and
Jats. Class represented — Dakhani Mahomedans.
The Merwara Battalion, composed entirely of Mers.
HISTORICAL NOTES REGARDING THE CORPS ABOVE NAMED.
THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL'S BODY-GUARD.
This Corps was organised in 1773, for the purpose of forming a Body-Guard to the
Governor-General in time of peace, and to accompany the Commander-in-Chief into the field
in time of war. It was originally designated " The Governor's troop of Moghals."
Soon after its formation the Corps was engaged in putting down the Saniasis, " a body of
militant and plundering devotees," and in 1774 it accompanied the Commander-in-Chief,
Colonel Champion, during the campaign in Rohilkhand. A portion of the Corps was for a
time in the Upper Provinces with Lord Lake during the Mahratta War, in 1805, and in 1811
the whole of the Corps proceeded on service to and took part in the conquest of Java. It
accompanied the Marquis of Hastings into the field during the Mahratta War of 1817-18, and
in 1824 a strong detachment proceeded on service to Burma, where it distinguished itself on
many occasions.
In 1843, the corps was with Lord Ellenborough at the battle of Maharajpur, and it
accompanied Lord Hardinge into the field during the Sutlej Campaign, and was engaged in
the battles of Mudki (where it was greatly distinguished), Firozshah, Aliwal and Sobraon. It
has not since been employed in the field.
THE IST (DUKE OF YORK'S OWN) BENGAL LANCERS.
This corps was formed in 1803 from a body of horse which came over to Lord Lake
immediately after the battle of Delhi ; and was placed under the command of Captain James
Skinner, a Eurasian Officer, who had been in the service of Sindhia, from whom the corps
458 APPENDIX III
acquired the designation of " Skinner's Horse." At a later period it was known as the " ist
Local Horse," the " ist Irregular Cavalry," and the " ist Bengal Cavalry." It l>ecame the
" ist Bengal Lancers " in 1896. It was prominently engaged in the pursuit of Amir Khan,
Pindari, through Rohilkhand, in the defeat of that Chieftain at Afzalgarh (March 1805), and
in the pursuit of Holkar to the Beas.
In 1809 the corps took part in the capture, after a severe fight, of Bhawani in Harriana.
A small portion of the regiment took part in the Nepal War in 1814-15 ; and the whole was
employed in the operations against the Mahrattas and Pindaris in 1817-18, and in the siege
and capture of Bhartpur in 1825-26.
Several rissalahs of the regiment were employed in Afghanistan at various times during
the war of 1838-42, and on all occasions they greatly distinguished themselves, especially in
the action at Dadur in October 1840, in the operations of General Nott at Kandahar, and in
the advance thence on Kabul in the autumn of 1842.
In 1852-53-54 the regiment was frequently engaged with Mohmands and other hill tribes
on the Peshawar border.
The Mutiny of 1857 found the regiment at Mooltan, and it then rendered itself con-
spicuous by its fidelity. It not only took a prominent part in disarming two regiments of
native infantry which were ripe for mutiny, but subsequently acted with great energy and
loyalty against rebels and mutineers in the Giigaira district.
During the Afghan war of 1879-80 the regiment was employed in the Kuram Valley and
on the Kohat frontier. The regiment was detailed for the expedition to China in 1900, and it
rendered conspicuous good service in the advance from Tientsin and in the relief of the
Legations in Pekin, in August of that year.
IOTH (THE DUKE OF CAMBRIDGE'S OWN) BENGAL LANCERS.
This regiment was originally part of " Hodson's Horse." It was formed into a separate
corps in August 1858 ; became the loth Regiment of Bengal Cavalry on the Bengal Army
being reorganised after the Mutiny, and received its present designation in 1878.
" Hodson's Horse," so called from Lieutenant (afterwards Major) W. S. R. Hodson, ist
Bengal Fusiliers, by whom the corps was raised, was the first corps formed in the Punjab
after the outbreak of the Mutiny : it was prominently engaged in the operations before
Delhi in 1857, in the actions at Bulandshahr, Aligarh and Agra, the relief of Lucknow
(November 1857), the actions of Gungari, Patiali Mainpuri and Shamshabad, the siege and
capture of Lucknow (where Major Hodson was mortally wounded), and in the action at
Nawabganj. Subsequent to the last-mentioned event the corps was formed into a brigade of
three regiments, and it is with the second of these regiments that we are here concerned.
After its formation into a separate corps the regiment continued serving against the
mutineers and rebels in Oudh, until these were finally driven out of the province. In 1867
the regiment was detailed for the Abyssinian Expedition. In 1879-80 it was employed in the
operations on the Khaibar line, during the war with Afghanistan. The corps has' not since
been engaged in any operations in the field, except that a squadron was employed in an ex-
pedition against the Utman Khels during the Frontier War of 1897, and three squadrons in
the bloodless expedition against the Bunerwals in January 1898.
THE IITH (THE PRINCE OF WALES' OWN) BENGAL LANCERS.
This regiment was raised in the Punjab in August and September 1857. It was designated
the "ist Sikh Irregular Cavalry," but was at that time more generally known as "Wale's
Horse," its first Commandant having been Captain Frederick Wale, of the 48th Bengal
Native Infantry. On the reorganisation of the Bengal Army after the Mutiny it became the
nth Bengal Cavalry. It received its present designation in 1876.
Before the regiment had been fully formed it became necessary to send a portion of it on
service into the Gugaira district, then in a state of insurrection, where it rendered good service
in restoring order. Early in 1858 the regiment was sent down country, and having joined the
Army under the Commander-in-Chief, it took part in the operations resulting in the expulsion
of the rebels and mutineers from Lucknow ; in the course of these, in an action near the Musa
Bagh, on the 2ist March, Captain Wale was killed. In the subsequent operations ending in
the reconquest of Oudh the regiment was prominently engaged, earning a reputation second
to that of no other corps of irregular cavalry on the rolls of the Army.
In 1860 the regiment, commanded by Major D. M. Probyn (from whom it was known
APPENDIX III 459
for some time as " Probyn's Horse") proceeded on service to China. During the campaign
in that country it greatly distinguished itself on many occasions, notably in the action at
Sinho, at the reduction of the Taku Forts, and in the actions of Chow-ho and Chang-tsia-wan
during the advance on Pekin. The regiment returned to India in 1861 ; in 1863 it was
employed in the Ambela Expedition, and at the end of 1878 it proceeded on service into
Afghanistan, being engaged at the reduction of Ali Musjid, and subsequently in various
desultory operations on the Khaibar line.
In 1895 the regiment was detailed for duty with the force put into the field for the relief
of Chitral, and it greatly distinguished itself in the action which took place at the passage of
the Swat River on the 7th April. On the outbreak of the Frontier War of 1897, a squadron of
the regiment was employed in the defence of the Malakand position and greatly distinguished
itself, and later the whole regiment was employed in the expedition against the Mohmands
and in the operations in Bajaur.
THE i4TH BENGAL LANCERS.
This regiment derives its origin from a body of Jat Horse raised in 1857 by Captain
J. I. Murray, 7151 Bengal Native Infantry. On the reorganisation of the army after the
Mutiny this corps became the I4th Bengal Cavalry. It received its present designation in
1874.
During the mutinies the corps was frequently engaged with the enemy, notably at
Aligarh (24th August 1857), Kachla Ghat (1858), and Bhutwal, on the Nepal border (March
1859), in which last action the Jats greatly distinguished themselves. Subsequently (1865-66)
the regiment was engaged in the Bhutan War, and in September 1879 it proceeded on service
to Kabul with the force under the command of Sir Frederick Roberts ; it was present in the
action at Charasia, at the occupation of Kabul, and in the subsequent operations round Kabul
in December 1879, greatly distinguishing itself in the action at Kila Kazi, where it sustained
considerable loss.
THE I5TH (CURETON'S MULTANl) BENGAL LANCERS.
The regiment was formed in January 1858 from a body of Multani horsemen who had
been enrolled at Peshawar during the preceding year for duty at that place, and was originally
styled "the Mooltanee Regiment of Cavalry." On the reorganisation of the army after the
Mutiny the corps was designated "The isth (Cureton's Multani) Bengal Cavalry." It
received its present designation in 1890.
The regiment moved down to Rurki in February 1858, and in April marched into
Rohilkhand with the field force under the command of Brigadier J. Jones. In the actions at
Bhagaula, Nagina, Bareilly, Shahjehanpur, and in many others, it greatly distinguished itself.
It was subsequently engaged in the operations undertaken by Lord Clyde for the reconquest
of Oudh, and returned to the Punjab in the spring of 1859.
In 1860 a wing of the regiment was employed with the Mahsud Waziri expedition. In
1879, during the Afghan War, the regiment was detailed to form part of the field force located
at Vatakri. In 1888 it was employed in Hazara during the Black Mountain Expedition.
THE ISTH BENGAL LANCERS.
This regiment was raised at Gwalior in the autumn of 1858 as the "2nd Regiment of
Mahratta Horse," though there were not many Mahrattas in it. On the reorganisation of
the army after the Mutiny it became " the i8th Bengal Cavalry." It received its present
designation in 1886.
Soon after its formation a squadron of the regiment (principally composed of Jats and
Towannas) proceeded with a force under the command of Sir Robert Napier in pursuit of a
body of rebels under Prince Feroz Shah of Delhi, who were overtaken and routed at Ranod
on the I7th December.
During the Afghan War, 1879-80, the regiment was employed in the Kuram Valley, and
was repeatedly engaged with Zaimukht and Waziri raiders ; part of it also took part 'in the
Zaimukht Expedition. In 1881 it was employed with the Mahsud Waziri Expedition. It
was not employed again in the field until the outbreak of the Frontier War in 1897 ; it was
then first put into the field as part of a flying column sent into the Kuram Valley to repel
incursions and preserve order, but later it was detailed for and took part in the expedition to
the Tirah Highlands, where it rendered good service.
46o
APPENDIX III
THE GUIDES CAVALRY.
The Corps of Guides was raised at Peshawar early in 1847, under orders issued in
December 1846. The cavalry of the corps then consisted of a single troop ; it has since
grown to a strength of three squadrons or six troops.
Apart from some unimportant skirmishes on the frontier, the first service the troop saw
was at the siege ol Mooltan, where it distinguished itself on more than one occasion. Early
in 1849 it joined the infantry of the corps in the Jullundar Doab, and was engaged in the
actions of Narot and Dalla, afterwards joining the main army under the Commander-in-Chief,
and being present at the battle of Goojerat, and in the subsequent pursuit of the Sikhs and
Afghans to Peshawar.
During the succeeding years the troop was engaged in various operations against the
tribes on the Peshawar border — Yusufzais, Afridis, Mohmands, Uttman Khels, and others —
greatly distinguishing itself on every occasion.
On the outbreak of the Mutiny in 1857, the Guides were ordered down to Hindustan to
join the force assembling for the siege of Delhi, and after a splendid march of 580 miles in
26 days the corps marched into the British camp before Delhi on the glh June. Throughout
the siege the corps was almost daily engaged with the enemy, rendering splendid service and
greatly contributing to the fall of the city. During the siege a portion of the cavalry (now
consisting of three troops) was detached with a force under Brigadier-General Nicholson, and
was present at the action of Najafgarh, and after the siege the whole of the Guides Cavalry
formed part of a force despatched from Delhi to intercept the Jodhpur Legion, which was
met and routed, after a severe conflict, at Narnaul. Early in the following year the Corps of
Guides returned to their station on the frontier.
During the succeeding years the Guides Cavalry were engaged in a number of expeditions
against the Frontier tribes, and in the operations against the Kabul Khel Waziris and Mahsud
Waziris, and in the Ambela Expedition of 1863 rendered useful if not brilliant service.
On the outbreak of the Afghan War in 1878, the Corps of Guides was detailed to form
part of the force which advanced into the Khaibar. After taking part in various operations
the cavalry of the corps was engaged in the action at Fatehabad (and April 1879), in which
it greatly distinguished itself and lost its commanding officer, Major Wigram Battye, who
fell while leading a brilliant charge against the enemy. The war was soon afterwards
terminated by the treaty of Gandamak, but it burst out afresh in the following September,
when occurred the outbreak at Kabul, in which the British envoy and his escort (consisting
of detachments of cavalry and infantry from the Corps of Guides) were overpowered and
massacred after a gallant resistance. The Guides again moved up the Kahibar line, and,
having been summoned to Kabul by Sir Frederick Roberts, reached that place on the nth
December. During the succeeding days the corps was prominently engaged in the operations
round Kabul, and greatly distinguished itself, the cavalry making many grand charges and
sustaining considerable losses.
The Guides Cavalry were not again employed in the field until 1895, when they were
detailed to form part of the Chitral Relief Force under the command of Sir Robert Low, and
they greatly distinguished themselves in the actions of Khar and at the crossing of the Swat
River. On the outbreak of the Frontier War of 1897 and the development of the attack on
the Malakand position, the corps was moved up to that place and took a prominent place in
the defence, and in January 1898 the Guides Cavalry formed part of the force sent against
the Bunerwals, an expedition which proved a bloodless one.
THE KOHAT MOUNTAIN BATTERY.
This battery was raised at Bannu in 1851, and was originally designated " No. 2 Punjab
Light Field Battery." It was for many years known as " No. i (Kohat) Mountain Battery,"
and received its present designation in 1901.
This battery took part in the Shirani, Bozdar, Mahsud Waziri (1860) and Jowaki
Expeditions. On the outbreak of the Afghan War it was detailed for the Kurum Force, and
was present at the forcing of the Paiwar Kotal and in the expedition into Khost. On the
renewal of the war in the autumn of 1879, the battery took part in the actions on the
Shutargardan , and in the operations round Kabul in December 1879.
In subsequent years the battery was employed in the Mahsud Waziri Expedition (1881) ;
in the expedition against the Akhas (Northern Assam), in 1883-84 ; and in the Waziristan
APPENDIX III 461
pedition (1894-95). On the outbreak of the Frontier War in 1897 the battery was detailed
or the Tirah Expeditionary Force, and served with distinction in the action on the Dargai
Heights, and in many other operations of that campaign.
THE DERAJAT MOUNTAIN BATTERY.
This battery was raised in 1849, but it was not brought into the Junjab Frontier Force
ntil 1851. It was originally designated '' No. 3 Punjab Light Field Battery " ; was known
or many years.as " No> 2 (Derajat) Mountain Battery," and received its present designation
n 1901.
The battery was employed in the Miranzai and Bozdar Expeditions ; in Bundelkhand
igainst the rebels and mutineers; and in the Mahsud Waziri (1860), Ambela, Dawar, and
~owaki Expeditions. On the outbreak of the Afghan War in 1878 the battery was employed
n the Kuram Valley and in the expedition into Khost, and on the renewal of the war in the
autumn of 1879 >l accompanied Sir Frederick Roberts in his advance on Kabul ; it was
:nt at the action of Charasia, at the occupation of Kabul, and in the fighting round that
place in December 1879. In the following year it was present at the action of Chihildakteran,
n the Logar Valley, and having accompanied Sir Frederick Roberts in his march to
Kandahar, it took part in the defeat of Ayub Khan in the decisive battle fought near that
olace on the 1st September. Subsequently it was engaged in the Mahsud Waziri Expedition
1881), in the Black Mountain Expedition of 1888-1891, and in the operations of 1891 on the
samana range in Mirnnzai.
In the Chitral operations of 1895, the battery was employed on the lines of communication
)f Sir Robert Low's force. In the Frontier War of 1897 it was at first employed in the Kuram
Valley, and afterwards with the main column of the Tirah Expeditionary Force ; in the course
of these operations it was often prominently engaged.
During the winter of 1901-1902 the battery was employed in the blockade of the Mahsud
vVaziris.
THE PESHAWAR MOUNTAIN BATTERY.
This battery was formed at Peshawar in 1853, and was then known as the " Peshawar
vlountain Train." The train was originally manned by a company of European artillerymen,
but these were replaced in 1854 by natives. For many years the battery was known as " No.
3 (Peshawar) Mountain Battery " ; its present designation dates from 1901.
The battery served in the expeditions against the Bori Afridis in 1853, and against the Aka
' " _"' " in the expedition against the Hinc
of Sittana ; in the expeditions against the Kabul Khel Waziris and Mahsud Waziris (1860) ;
Khel Afridis in 1854. Later (1858), it served in the expedition against the Hindustani fanatics
n the Ambela Expedition (1863), in which it greatly distinguished itself; in the Black
Vlountain Expedition (1868) ; and in the Lushai Expedition (1872). During the Afghan War
:he battery was employed in Southern Afghanistan, and was engaged in the action of Baghao,
March 1879. In 1881 it was employed with the Mahsud Waziri Expedition, and in 1891 in
:he operations in Miranzai and on the Samana range.
In 1894 the battery formed part of the Waziristan Boundary Delimitation Escort, and was
engaged in the defence of the British camp at Wana when the Waziris attempted to rush it
on the 3rd November. It subsequently served in the Waziristan operations of 1894-95.
During the Frontier War of 1897 the battery was employed in the Tochi Valley.
THE HAZARA MOUNTAIN BATTERY.
This battery was formed in Hazara in 1848, during the second Sikh War, though not
placed upon a regular footing until the following year. It was at first styled "The Hazara
Mountain Train." At a later period it was known for many years as "No. 4 (Hazara)
Mountain Battery " ; its present designation was conferred upon it in 1901.
The first service of the battery was in the Black Mountain Expedition, 1852-53. In 1858
it was employed against the Hindustani fanatics of Sittana. In subsequent years it served in
the expeditions against the Kabul Khel Waziris (1859), and the Mahsud Waziris (1860) ; in
the Ambela Expedition (1863), where it had the good fortune to distinguish itself; in the
Black Mountain Expedition (1868); in the Daffla (Assam) Expedition (1874), and in the
operations against the Jowaki Afridis in 1877-78. In the Afghan War it was detailed to form
part of the Peshawar Field Force, and served in the capture of AH Musjid, and in the
operations on the Khaibar line. On the renewal of the war in the autumn of 1879, il
462 APPENDIX III
continued serving on the Khaibar line, and eventually it moved up to Kabul. In 1881 itj
was employed in the Mahsud Waziri Expedition, and in 1885 it proceeded on service toj
Burma, where it continued actively employed against the Burmese, and against various
frontier tribes, until 1887. In the following year it took part in the Black Mountain
Expedition, Hazara, and in 1891 in the first Miranzai Expedition; and at the end ot thd
same year two guns of the battery were employed in the Hunza-Nagar operations, and were]
engaged at the capture of Nilt. In 1895 the battery was employed in the operations under-
taken for the relief of Chitral, and was engaged in the forcing of the Malakand Pass and;
other operations.
In 1898 two guns of the battery were employed in the operations in Mekran, and did
good service in the action of Gokparosh.
THE QUETTA MOUNTAIN BATTERY.
The battery derives its origin from one of three companies of the old Bombay Native)
Artillery which were retained in the service after the general disbandment of native artillery
when the Indian Armies were reorganised after the mutinies. It was designated "No. i
Bombay Mountain Battery" in 1876, and was afterwards known as "No. 5 (Bombay)
Mountain Battery." It received its present designation in 1901.
When forming part of the old 4th Battalion of Bombay Artillery, the battery served in
the Punjab Campaign of 1848-49, and was present at the siege of Mooltan. In 1867-68 it
served on the expedition to Abyssinia. In 1884 the battery was employed with the Zhob
expedition ; and in the following year, on the outbreak of the war with Burma, it was sent to
that country as part of the expeditionary force, and continued on service there until 1887. In
1892 the battery again proceeded on service to Burma, and a section took part in the expedi-
tion against the Thetta Chins. In 1896 the battery formed part of the force sent from India
to hold Suakin in the Eastern Soudan while the Anglo-Egyptian Army was engaged in the
expedition to Dongola.
In 1897, during the war on the N.W. Frontier, the battery formed part of the Mohmand
Field Force, and was engaged in the operations against the Mohmands and against the
Mamands in Bajaur. It was afterwards detailed for the Tirah Field Force, and was engaged
throughout those operations, including the action on the Dargai heights, the forcing of the
Sampagha Pass (when the Commandant of the battery was killed) and of the Arhanga Pass,
the action of Saran Sar, and various other operations.
THE JULLUNDUR MOUNTAIN BATTERY.
This battery, like the Quetta Mountain Battery, derives its origin from one of three
companies of Bombay Native Artillery which were retained in'the service after the mutinies.
In 1876 it was designated " No. 2 Bombay Mountain Battery " ; it was known at one time as
"the Jacobabad Mountain Battery, "and afterwards as "No. 6 (Bombay) Mountain Battery."
It obtained its present designation in 1901.
On the outbreak of the war with the Afghanistan in 1878, the battery was detailed for
service as part of the division assembled at Quetta. It took part in the operations in Southern
Afghanistan, and a section was present in the action of Baghao. In 1880, after the defeat of;
General Burrows at Maiwand, the battery formed part of the force which moved up from
Quetta under the command of General Phayre, for the relief of Kandahar. In 1889 the
battery proceeded on service to Burma, where it took part in the Wuntho Expedition (1891)
and in various operations in the North-East of Burma.
A section of the battery formed part of the political officers' escort when it was suddenly
assailed by the tribesmen at Maizar in the Tochi Valley on the xoth June 1897, which was.
the beginning of the Frontier War of 1897-98. The other two sections were detailed subse-
quently for the Tochi Field Force, but after the first outburst little or no fighting took place in
the Tochi Valley.
THE GUJERAT MOUNTAIN BATTERY.
The battery was raised in 1886, and was at first designated "No. i Bengal Mountain
Battery." It was afterwards styled "No. 7 (Bengal) Mountain Battery"; and received its;
present designation in 1901. As soon as it was organised the battery was despatched (Feb-,
ruary 1887) on service to Burma, where it continued until 1890, having been employed in
APPENDIX III 463
various operations against Burmese dacoits and against the Chins, Lushais, Kachins, and
other tribes. Towards the end of the year it was employed with the Zhob Field Force.
During the winter of 1901-2 the battery was employed in the blockade of the Waziris and in
the counter raids made into the Waziri country.
THE LAHORE MOUNTAIN BATTERY.
This battery was raised in 1886, and was at first styled " No. 2 Bengal Mountain
Battery." It was afterwards designated " No. 8 (Bengal) Mountain Battery," and acquired
its present designation in 1901.
As soon as its organisation was completed the battery was despatched on service to
Burma, and it was actively engaged until 1889 against various insurgent tribes in the Bhamo
District. In 1891 the battery was employed in the Manipur Expedition, and during the
winter of 1891-92 it took part in the operations in the Chin Hills. In 1894-95 tne battery was
employed on the expedition to the Waziristan Hills. On the breaking out of the Frontier
war in 1897, it formed part of the force engaged in the defence of the Malakand, and it sub-
sequently termed part of the Malakand Field Force in the operations against the Mohmands
and against the Mamands in Bajaur, and finally in January 1898, it took part in the expedition
against the Bunerwals.
THE MURREE MOUNTAIN BATTERY.
This battery was raised in 1899, and was at first designated " No. 9 (Native) Mountain
Battery." It received its present designation in 1901. In December 1901 two guns of the
battery were employed on field service in Mekran, and were prominently engaged in the cap-
ture of Nodiz. During the winter of 1901-2 the other four guns of the battery were employed
with the forces engaged in operations against the Mahsud Waziris, and took part in some of
the raids made into the Waziri country.
THE ABBOTTABAD MOUNTAIN BATTERY.
This battery was raised in 1900 and was originally styled " No. 10 (Native) Mountain
Battery." It received its present designation in the following year.
THE CORPS OF BENGAL SAPPERS AND MINERS.
The Bengal Sappers and Miners derive their origin from a corps of pioneers raised in
1803, and from a corps of sappers and miners raised in 1819, the former of which was
incorporated with the latter in the year 1833. At one time the corps was known as "the
Bengal Sappers and Pioneers." It received its present designation in 1851.
The corps of pioneers formed in 1803 had a brilliant record of service for the thirty years
that it preserved a separate existence. It served throughout the Mahratta War of 1803-5,
including the capture of Aligarh, Agra and Deig, and the siege of Bhartpur ; in 1807 it served
at the reduction of Komona and Ganauri ; in 1809 and the succeeding years portions of the
corps served during the arduous operations in Bundelkhand, and in 1811 a strong detachment
served in the operations resulting in the conquest of Java ; during the years from 1814 to 1816
portions of the corps were prominently engaged in the various operations of the Nepal War,
and rendered gallant service ; similarly portions of the corps rendered good service in the
various sieges which took place from 1816 to 1819, including those of Hathras and of the
great rock fortress of Asirgarh ; and, finally, few corps were so prominently engaged or
rendered more essential service at the siege and capture of Bhurtpur in 1825-26, in which
important service the newly-formed corps of sappers and miners also had a prominent share.
Subsequent to the amalgamation of the two corps, the first service on which the Bengal
Sappers and Miners were employed was the expedition to Afghanistan, for which two
companies were detailed ; these were prominently engaged at the capture of Ghazni in 1839.
On the renewal of the war in 1841, one company accompanied the troops under General
Pollock and took part in the forcing of the Khaibar Pass (April 1842), and in the various
operations leading up to the reoccupation of Kabul.
In the succeeding years the corps, or portions of it, shared in every operation of import-
ance that took place— in the battles of Maharajpur and Paniar ; in the Sutlej campaign,
including the battles of Ferozshahr, Aliwal and Sobraon ; in the Punjab campaign, including
464 APPENDIX III
the siege and capture of Mooltan and the battles of Chillianwalla and Gujerat ; and in
numerous expeditions on the North-West Frontier from 1850 to 1854.
On the outbreak of the Mutiny in 1857, about two-thirds of the corps mutinied or
deserted. But over 500 remained true to their allegiance, and the gallant services rendered
by these went far to redeem the good name of the corps. Of the faithful remnant a large
portion were employed in the advance on and siege of Delhi, in the course of which they
rendered invaluable services, while the gallantry displayed by the party detailed to blow in
the Kashmir Gate on the day of assault has not been surpassed in military annals. After the
capture of Delhi portions of the corps accompanied various movable columns in pursuit of
the enemy, and after being frequently engaged with the enemy, eventually took part in the
relief of the Lucknow Residency in November 1857, in the siege and capture of Lucknow in
March 1858, and in various other operations in Oudh and Rohilkhand.
In 1858 a detachment of the corps was employed on the expedition against the Hindustani
fanatics at Sittana. Detachments were also employed in the Mahsud Waziri Expedition of
1860, in the Ambela campaign (1863), in the Bhutan War (1864-65), the Black Mountain
Expedition (1868), the Lushai Expedition (1871-72), and the Jowakhi Expedition (1877-78).
During the Afghan War, 1878-80, the whole corps was in the field, distributed by companies
amongst the various forces, and there was no operation of importance in which one part or
another of the corps did not take part.
In 1881 one company was employed on the Mahsud Waziri Expedition, and in the
succeeding years detachments were employed in the war in Burma (1885-87), in the Black
Mountain Expedition (1888), the Sikkim Expedition (1888), the Chin-Lushai Expedition (1889-
90), the operations on the Samana Range (1891), the Isazai Expedition (1892), the Waziristan
Expedition (1894-95), the Chitral operations (1895), in the great Frontier War of 1897-98, and
finally in the expedition of 1900 to China. In short it may be said that the history of the
Bengal Sappers and Miners is, for the period that the corps has been in existence, practically
the history of the Bengal Army.
IST BRAHMAN INFANTRY.
The corps was raised in the year 1776 as part of a brigade to be maintained by the
Nawab Wazir of Oudh. It was transferred to the Bengal Army in the following year, and
after undergoing various changes of name and number it was finally designated the ' ' ist
Brahman Infantry " in 1900.
The first prominent service in which the corps was engaged was the suppression, at
Midnapore in 1795, of the mutiny of the I5th Native Battalion. In 1803 it took the field
with the army under Lord Lake, and was engaged at the capture of Agra, the battle of
Laswari, the capture of Gwalior, the retreat of Colonel Monson through Rajputana, and the
siege of Bhartpur. In 1815-16 it took part in the Nepal War, and in 1826 in the siege and
capture of Bhartpur. In 1857, when the Mutiny broke out, the regiment was stationed at
Peshawar, and it then exhibited the most conspicuous loyalty : it not only retained its arms
throughout that dark period, but was engaged in operations against some of the neighbouring
Pathan tribes, who, taking advantage of the circumstances of the time, had raised disturbances
on the frontier ; it was prominently engaged in the operations resulting in the destruction of
Sittana in 1858. In 1884 the regiment was employed in the Zhob Valley Expedition, and in
1886-88 in the operations in Burma. Since then it has not been engaged in any operations in
the field, but it has taken a tour of garrison duty at Mauritius. It was formed into a corps of
Brahmans in 1893.
7TH (DUKE OF CONNAUGHT'S OWN) RAJPUT INFANTRY.
This corps was raised in 1804 as the ist Battalion of the 24th Bengal Native Infantry,
which designation was altered to that of the ' ' 47th Bengal Native Infantry " in 1824. It served
during the Mahratta Wars of 1804-5 and 1817-18, but, on being ordered on service to Arakan,
the regiment mutinied at Barrackpore in November 1824, and was in consequence struck out
of the Army List. A new regiment which was numbered the 69th was raised in its place,
and this corps was designated the "47th Bengal Native Infantry" in 1828. It became the
7th Rajput Infantry in 1900.
The first important campaign in which this corps was employed was that on the banks of
the Sutlej in 1845-46, in the course of which it was prominently engaged in the battles of
Mudki, Ferozshah, Aliwal and Sobraon.
APPENDIX III 465
In 1857, when the Mutiny broke out, the regiment was at Mirzapur. It remained
faithful to its colours, and even took part in operations against the mutineers and rebels, but
it was subsequently deemed necessary, as a measure of precaution, to disarm it. In 1858,
having volunteered tor service in China, it was rearmed and sent thither, and served there
until 1860. In 1869 the regiment was engaged on operations against the Lushai tribes on the
Cachar border ; and in 1882 it formed part of the force sent from India to take part in the opera-
tions against Arabi Pasha, and was engaged in the battle of Tel-el-Kebir and the occupation
of Cairo. In 1891 it proceeded on service to Burma, and was engaged in the operations in
the Chin Hills in 1891-92 ; and in 1900 it formed part of the expedition to China, and rendered
distinguished service during the advance from Tientsin and in the relief of the Legations in
Pekin (August 1900).
IOTH JAT INFANTRY.
This regiment was raised in 1823 as the ist Battalion of the 33rd Bengal Native Infantry.
It subsequently became the 6sth Bengal Native Infantry, and received its present designation
in 1900.
The regiment was not engaged in any operations in the field prior to the Mutiny of 1857.
At that period it was stationed at Ghazipore. It remained faithful, but it was found necessary
to disarm it as a measure of precaution. On volunteering for service in China the corps was
re-armed and sent thither in 1858 : it was stationed at Canton, and took part in some minor
operations against the Chinese. It returned to India in 1860, and was not again employed on
any operations in the field until 1887, when it proceeded on service to Burma. During that
and the two following years the corps was engaged in various operations against bands of
Burmese insurgents in the Chindwin and Gangaw districts, and in 1889-90 it was employed on
an expedition against Chins and Lushais. It was formed into a corps of Jats in 1893.
ISTH (LUDHIANA) SlKH INFANTRY.
This regiment was raised as a corps of Sikhs at Ludhiana in 1846, and was originally
styled "The Regiment of Ludhiana." It became the isth Regiment of Bengal Native
Infantry on the re-organisation of the Army after the Mutiny of 1857, and received its present
designation in 1900.
The regiment was not engaged in any operations in the field prior to the Mutiny of 1857.
When that event occurred the regiment of Ludhiana was stationed at Benares, with a detach-
ment at Juan pore. On the 4th June, in the course of a greatly mismanaged attempt to
disarm the Hindustani troops at Benares, the Ludhiana Regiment was fired upon and
dispersed by a battery of British Artillery, the commanding officer of which had jumped to
the conclusion that it had mutinied like the Hindustanis, owing to one of the bad characters of
the regiment having fired at his commanding officer, against whom he had a personal grudge.
The news of the events at Benares, distorted by Hindustani fugitives from that place, caused
the detachment of the regiment at Juanpore to break out into mutiny and murder the officer
in command, but the bulk of the regiment (excluding the remains of the Hindustanis intro-
duced as native officers, non-commissioned officers and drill instructors on the formation of
the corps in 1846) was perfectly loyal, and most of the men having returned within a few days,
the corps was employed during that and the following year in keeping open the Grand Trunk
Road, in the course of which service they were repeatedly engaged with the rebels and
mutineers.
In 1860 the regiment proceeded on service to China. It formed part of the garrison of
Shanghai, and was there engaged with the Tai-ping rebels. It returned to India in the
following year. In 1878 it proceeded on service to Southern Afghanistan, and was stationed
at Kandahar until March 1880, when it took part in the movement towards Kabul. It was
engaged in the battle of Ahmad Khel (i9th April), in the subsequent march back to Kandahar
in August 1880, under Sir Frederick Roberts, and in the defeat of Ayub Khan at the battle of
Mazra, near Kandahar.
In 1885 the regiment proceeded on service to Suakin, in the Eastern Soudan, and was
prominently engaged at the battle of Tofrek, where the "stone-wall" stand it made against
the rush of the fanatical Arabs proved the salvation of the British force. In the spring of
1891 the regiment was engaged in the arduous operations on the Samana range, and in 1897
it took part in the Tirah Expedition, during which it greatly distinguished itself and sustained
heavy losses.
2G
466 APPENDIX III
THE ITTH MAHOMEDAN RAJPUT INFANTRY.
This corps was formed at Phillour in 1857 from the faithful remnants of the 3rd, 36th and
6ist Regiments of Bengal Native Infantry, the first of which had mutinied at Phillour, and
the other two at Jallundur. On the reorganisation of the Bengal Army after the Mutiny in
1861, the regiment was brought into the line as "The 1710 (Loyal Purbiah) Regiment of
Bengal Infantry." It received its present designation in 1901. The regiment was not
employed on service in the field until 1880, when it formed part of a force sent to Southern
Afghanistan in consequence of the defeat and destruction of a Bombay brigade at Maiwand
in July of that year. It returned from Kandahar in 1881.
In 1885, the regiment was selected to form part of the Indian Contingent sent to Suakin
in the Eastern Soudan. On the 22nd March of that year it was engaged in the battle of
Tofrek, on which occasion, having been thrown into disorder by the cavalry videttes galloping
in on its front, and charged by the fanatical Arab host before it could form up again, the
regiment was pushed back and sustained heavy loss, its commanding officer being amongst
the slain. The regiment was subsequently employed on garrison duty in Suakin, and did not
return to India until the end of the year.
Towards the end of 1888 the regiment proceeded on service to Burma, and in the follow-
ing year was engaged in operations in the Bhamo district. The regiment has not since been
engaged in operations in the field except in the recent blockade of the Mahsud Waziris,
inclusive of raids made into the enemy's country. In the earlier part of its service on the
frontier a small detachment of the regiment under the command of a subadar was cut off by
the enemy and destroyed almost to a man.
THE 20TH (THE DUKE OF CAMBRIDGE'S OWN) PUNJAB INFANTRY.
This regiment was formed at Nowshera in August 1857, by transfers from the 4th and 5th
Punjab Infantry, and from some of the Military Police Battalions. It was then styled " The
8th Punjab Infantry," but on the reorganisation of the Army after the Mutiny it became
"The 2oth (Punjab) Regiment of Bengal Native Infantry." It received its present designa-
tion in 1883.
In April 1858 the regiment was employed in the field, for the first time, on an expedition
against the Khudu Khels and the Hindustani fanatics of Sittana. In 1860 the regiment
volunteered for service on the expedition to China and was sent thither accordingly. It was
present in the action of Sinho, at the reduction of the Taku Forts, and at the occupation of
Pekin. Returning to India in 1861 the regiment was detailed in the autumn of 1863 for the
Eusafzai Field Force, with which it served throughout the the Ambela campaign : it was most
prominently engaged throughout the operations, and distinguished itself by its forward valour
on many occasions, sustaining heavy losses (135 officers and men killed and wounded).
In 1866 the regiment took part in a dash on the Utman Khel village of Baizai, which had
become refractory; in 1868 it was employed in the expedition to the Black Mountain in
Hazara, and in 1877-78 it was engaged in the arduous operations against the Jowaki Afridis.
On the outbreak of the Afghan War in 1878 the regiment was detailed for the Peshawar
Valley Field Force, with which it took part in the operations resulting in the reduction of Ali
Masjid ; it afterwards shared in various desultory operations on the Khaibar line, and in the
Zaimukht Expedition and other operations on the Kuram line. In 1881 it formed part of the
force employed to operate against the Mahsud Waziris.
In 1882 the regiment was detailed for the expeditionary force sent to Egypt to coerce
Arabi Pasha, and took part in the battle of Tel-el-Kebir and the occupation of Zag-a-Zig.
In 1894 the regiment formed part of the escort of a Commission which was detailed to
determine the Waziri-Afghan Boundary in accordance with the treaty made at Kabul in 1893,
and was engaged in the defence of the camp of the escort when the Waziris made a desperate
attempt to rush it on the 3rd November 1894, and it subsequently, during the winter of 1894-95,
took part in the punitive expedition despatched into the Waziri hills under Sir William Lock-
hart. On the outbreak of the Frontier War of 1897 the regiment (then at Peshawar) was
detached with a force to Shabkadar, which was threatened by the Mohmands, and was present
in the action at that place on the gth August. It subsequently formed part of the Mohmand
Field Force during the operations in Bajaur, and towards the end of the year it took part in
the expedition against the Bunerwals.
In 1900 the regiment proceeded on the expedition to Northern China.
APPENDIX III 467
THE 23RD PUNJAB PIONEERS.
This regiment was raised at Lahore in the autumn of 1857 as a corps of Mazbi Pioneers,
and was originally designated " The i£th (Pioneer) Regiment of Punjab Infantry." On the
reorganisation of the Army after the mutinies it became "The 23rd (Punjab) Regiment of
Bengal Native Infantry (Pioneers)," and it received its present designation in 1900.
Having volunteered for service in China, the regiment was sent thither in 1860, and it
was engaged in the action at Sinho, in the capture of the Taku Forts, in the actions at Chang-
tsia-Wan and Pa-le-Chao, and in the occupation of Pekin, in several of which operations it
greatly distinguished itself. Returning to India in 1861, the regiment was detailed at the end
of 1863 for the Eusofzai Field Force, with which it took part in the later operations of the
Ambela campaign, and was specially distinguished in the actions of the I5th and i6th Decem-
ber, which brought the war to a close.
In 1866 the regiment formed part of a force which made a dash on the refractory village
of Baizai, and in the following year it was detailed to form part of the expedition sent to
Abyssinia ; it was one of the first regiments that landed in that country, and was prominently
engaged and greatly distinguished itself in the action of Arogi (loth April 1868). A few days
later Magdala was captured, and the regiment returned to India during the summer of 1868.
In the autumn of 1878 on the outbreak of the Afghan War, the regiment was detailed for
service with the Kuram Force, under the command of Major-General Roberts. It took part
in the forcing of the Paiwar Kotal on the 2nd December, and in the subsequent advance to
Ali Khel. On the massacre of the British Mission at Kabul in September 1879, the regiment
advanced on Kabul with the force under Sir Frederick Roberts, and took part in the action at
Charasia, the occupation of Kabul, and in the subsequent operations at that place in Decem-
ber 1879, including the defence of the Sherpur Cantonment and of the Lataband post. In
August 1880, on receipt of news of the defeat of a Bombay brigade at Maiwand, the regiment
was detailed to form part of the force despatched to Kandahar under the command of Sir
Frederick Roberts, and it was prominently engaged in the defeat of Ayub Khan near Kanda-
har on the ist September. It returned to India, via Quetta, in the following month.
In January 1891 the regiment was employed in the first Miranzai expedition, in the course
of which severe hardships were experienced. In 1895 the regiment formed part of the force
destined for the relief of Chitral under Sir Robert Low. In 1901-2 a wing of the regiment was
employed on the Waziri border in enforcing the blockade imposed on the Mahsud Waziris for
repeated raids into and outrages in British territory, and was engaged in some of the counter-
raids into the enemy's country.
THE 33RD PUNJAB INFANTRY.
This regiment was raised at Allahabad in 1857, and was originally termed the " Allahabad
Levy." On the reorganisation of the Army after the mutinies this Levy became " The 33rd
Regiment of Bengal Native Infantry." It received its present designation in 1900.
Soon after it was raised the Levy was engaged in the pursuit of bands of rebels. The
corps was not again employed in the field until 1887, when it was sent on service to Burma,
where, during that and the next three years, it saw a good deal of service against Burmese
dacoit bands and against the Chin and Lushai tribes.
In 1891, in pursuance of measures for the improvement of the Army as a fighting machine,
the existing material of the regiment was mustered out and replaced by Punjabi Mahomedans.
Since its reconstitution the regiment has twice been on field service — first, with the Waziristan
Field Force during the winter of 1894-95. and, secondly, with the Tochi Field Force during the
Frontier War of 1897 — but it was not prominently engaged on either occasion.
THE 38TH DOGRA INFANTRY.
This regiment was raised at Agra in 1858, and was originally designated the "Agra
Levy." It became "The 38th Regiment of Bengal Native Infantry" on the Army being
reorganised after the mutinies, and it received its present designation in 1900. In 1889 the
regiment proceeded on service to Burma, where in the following year it was employed in an
expedition against the Chin-Lushai tribes.
In 1891, as one of the measures at that time adopted for improving the fighting efficiency
of the Army, the existing material of the regiment was mustered out and replaced by Dogras.
In the winter of 1894-95 the regiment was employed in the Waziristan Expedition. When
468
APPENDIX III
the Frontier War of 1897 broke out the corps was at Nowshera, and on the Malakand
position being attacked it was one of the regiments sent up to reinforce the troops there. It
subsequently formed part of the Malakand Field Force, and was actively employed in the
operations against the Mohmands and against Mamands and other tribes in Bajaur. During
the winter of 1900-1901 it was employed in the operations against the Mahsud Waziris, and
was engaged in some of the raids made into the enemy's country.
THE 39TH GARHWAL RIFLES.
This regiment was raised in 1887 as the 2nd Battalion of the 3rd Gurkha Regiment. It
was transferred to the line in 1891 as " The 39th (Garhwal) Regiment of Bengal Infantry," and
received its present designation in 1900.
The regiment proceeded to Burma in 1890, and during the succeeding cold season, and
again in the winter of 1892-93, it was employed in some arduous operations in the Chin Hills.
In 1897, during the Frontier War, the regiment formed part of the Malakand Field
Force, and was engaged in the operations against the Mohmands and against the Mamand
and other tribes in Bajaur, and it was employed on the line of communications during the
Tirah Expedition.
THE 2ND (THE PRINCE OF WALES' OWN) GURKHA RIFLE REGIMENT.
This regiment was raised at Nahan in the year 1815, from Gurkhas who had come over
and taken service with the British on the termination of the first phase of the Nepal War. It
was then designated " The Sirmoor Battalion," a title which it held for nearly forty years. It
received its present designation in 1876.
The battalion was employed in the field with the Reserve Division during the Mahratta
War of 1817-18. Six years later four Companies were employed in the storm and capture of
the Ghurree of Kunja in the Saharanpur District, and in 1825-26 two companies were employed
in the siege and capture of Bhartpur, where the Gurkhas greatly distinguished themselves.
On the outbreak of the First Sikh War, the battalion was ordered to Ludhiana, and it sub-
sequently took a prominent part in the battles of Aliwal and Sobraon, in the latter of which
it suffered severe losses, its commandant being among the slain.
When the Hindustani troops at Meerut and Delhi mutinied in May 1857, the battalion
was ordered down from Dehra to Meerut ; it eventually joined the field force advancing on
Delhi, and distinguished itself at the battle of Badli-ki-Serai. It subsequently served through-
out the siege and capture of Delhi, during which it was ever foremost in the fight, and
acquired a reputation second to that of no other corps there engaged. In 1858 it was
engaged in the operations undertaken for the expulsion of the rebels from Oudh.
In January 1864, the regiment was engaged in the repulse of a body of Mohmands who
were advancing on Fort Shahkadar, on the Peshawar Frontier. In 1868 it was employed in
the Black Mountain Expedition ; in the winter of 1871-72 it was employed in the Lushai
Expedition ; and in 1878 it formed one of the corps sent to the Mediterranean in connection
with the Russo-Turkish War.
Immediately after the return of the regiment from the Mediterranean, it was moved up
to the North- West Frontier in connection with the Afghan War. During the first phase of
the war it was employed on the Khaibar line, but on the renewal of the war in the autumn of
1879 it was moved up to Kabul, and after being engaged in various operations, including the
action of Chihildakhteran, it took part in Roberts' famous march to Kandahar, and in the
defeat of Ayub Khan in the decisive action fought near that place on the ist September 1880.
In 1886 a second battalion was added to the regiment, and in 1889-91 this battalion was
employed on various services against the Lushais and Chins in Burma. In 1891 the ist
Battalion was employed in the expedition to Manipur. On the outbreak of the Frontier War
in 1897 the ist Battalion was at first detailed for one of the reserve brigades, but it was soon
after sent to Kohat and employed in the relief of the Samana posts, then hotly assailed by the
Orakzais and Afridis. At a later stage it was detailed to form part of the Tirah Expeditionary
Force (the 2nd Battalion being at the same time named for the line of communications), and
it was prominently employed throughout the Tirah operations, exhibiting the most dis-
tinguished bravery in the action on the Dargai heights on the 2oth October.
In January 1902 the ist Battalion formed part of the forces employed in coercing the
Mahsud Waziris, and was engaged in one of the raids made into the Waziri country.
APPENDIX III 469
THE IST PUNJAB INFANTRY, PUNJAB FRONTIER FORCE.
This regiment was raised in the year 1849, as part of the Punjab Irregular Force.
In the very first year of its existence it was called into active service in the field as part of
a force sent to coerce the Baizai villages of Swat, and early in 1850 it was prominently engaged,
and highly distinguished, in the forcing of the Kohat Pass under Sir Charles Napier, and in
the further fighting on the Kohat Kotal. Subsequently the regiment was engaged in
numerous expeditions against the frontier tribes — Utman Khels, Shiranis and Kasranis,
Rubia Khel Orakzais, and Bozdars.
The regiment had scarcely returned from the Bozdar Expedition when news of the
mutinous outbreak at Meerut and Delhi was received, and it was ordered to join a movable
column organised to keep down mutiny in the Punjab. Later it was ordered down to Delhi,
at the siege and capture of which place (including the action fought at Najafgarh) it was pro-
minently engaged and greatly distinguished. After the fall of Delhi, the regiment was
employed in restoring order in the country to the west of the city, and in the following year it
served in the Rohilkhand Campaign, including the actions at Bhagaula, Nagina, Bareilly, and
other places. In the succeeding years the regiment was engaged in expeditions against the
Kabul Khel and the Mahsud Waziris. In the Ambela Expedition (1863) it was prominently
engaged and rendered gallant service throughout, suffering, however, heavy losses (135 killed
and wounded).
On the outbreak of the Afghan War in 1878 the regiment was detailed for the Southern
Afghanistan Field Force, and was present in several small engagements. In the action at
Baghao, against the Bori and Zhob Pathans, it greatly distinguished itself. In 1881 the
regiment took part in the Mahsud Waziri Expedition, and in 1891 in the operations in
Miranzai and on the Samana range. A detachment of the regiment formed part of the escort
of the political officer when he was attacked by the tribesmen at Maizar in the Tochi Valley
on the zoth June 1897, which was the beginning of the Frontier War of 1897-98. The regi-
ment subsequently formed part of the Tochi Field Force, but after the first outburst there was
little or no fighting in the Tochi Valley.
During the winter of 1901-2 the regiment was employed in the blockade of the Mahsud
Waziris, who had been guilty of many raids and outrages in British territory, and was also
engaged in some of the counter-raids made into the Waziri country, by means of which these
tribesmen were finally brought into submission.
THE BODY-GUARD OF THE GOVERNOR OF MADRAS.
The Madras Body-Guard was originally formed in the year 1778. It then consisted of a
small party of European troopers only, but by 1781 the strength of the Guard had increased
to two troops, one of which was composed of Europeans and the other of natives. The
European troop was broken up in 1784, and since then the Body-Guard has consisted entirely
of natives, with, of course, British officers in command. The corps has since 1784 undergone
many changes of organisation.
The Body-Guard served in the field during the campaigns in the Carnatic (1781-84) and
in Mysore (1790-92), including the operations before Seringapatam.
In 1801-2 the Body-Guard was employed in the operations in Tinnevelly and Madura,
including the reduction of Panjalamkoorchy, and rendered excellent service in some of the
jungle operations. In 1804 a detachment was engaged in repelling a Pindari attack on the
camp of the British Minister with Sindhia. A small detachment of the corps, which was
serving at Nagpur as part of the escort of the British Resident, took part in the celebrated
cavalry charge at the battle of Sitabaldi in November 1817.
IST MADRAS LANCERS.
This regiment was raised in 1787, as the 5th Regiment of Madras Native Cavalry ; it
became the ist Regiment in the following year, and received its present designation in 1886.
The first service of the regiment was in the Mysore War of 1790-92. It was first employed
in the Baramahal, but in 1791 it formed part of the force with which Lord Cornwallis ad-
vanced into Mysore, and was present in the action near Bangalore, the capture of Bangalore,
the advance on Seringapatam, the battle of Arikera, and the subsequent retreat from before
Seringapatam. In 1799 the regiment was engaged in the last Mysore War, and was present
in the action at Malavelly and at the siege and capture of Seringapatam. It was subsequently
470 APPENDIX III
engaged in the . pursuit of the notorious Dhoondia Wagh, until his defeat and death at
Konahgal in 1800.
In 1801-2 the regiment was actively employed in the operations in Tinnevelly and
Madura, including the reduction of the strong fort of Panjalamkoorchy, after one attack had
been repulsed with great slaughter. In the jungle warfare that followed the regiment took no
small part. On the outbreak of the Mahratta War in 1803, the regiment was detailed to form
part of a corps of observation placed at Moodgal. In the following year it was engaged in
the defeat of a strong body of marauders at Hanmansagar, in the Raichor Doab. In 1810
the regiment served at the expulsion of Amir Khan from Seronge, and in 1819 it took part in
the capture of Kopaldroog. In 1826 the regiment proceeded on service to Burma, but it was
too late to take part in any active operations, though it proceeded as far north as Pegu. In
1834 the regiment was in the field on the North- West Frontier of Mysore during the Coorg
War but was not engaged in any operations.
In 1880 the regiment was sent to Sindh to form part of a reserve to the forces in
Afghanistan, and after the disaster at Maiwand it formed part of the force moved up to
Kandahar under General Phayre. In 1886 the regiment proceeded on service to Burma,
where it was actively engaged in the field until 1889.
THE "QUEEN'S OWN" MADRAS SAPPERS AND MINERS.
The corps derives its origin from a body of pioneers raised in the year 1780. Increased
considerably in strength, these pioneers were formed into two battalions in 1803, of which the
first was converted into a corps of Sappers and Miners in 1831, the second battalion being
absorbed into the same corps two years later. The corps received its present designation in
1876.
Almost as soon as it was formed the corps took the field with the army under the
command of Sir Eyre Coote, and was actively engaged in all the operations of the second
Mysore War, 1780-83, including the battles of Porto Novo, Palilur, Sholingarh, and Vira-
Kandalur, the relief of Vellore, the battle of Ami, and the operations at Cuddalore. Besides
these, detachments of the corps were present at the capture of Negapatam and Trincomali
(in Ceylon), and at the capture of the forts of Panjalamkoorchy and Palghatcherry.
In the third Mysore War, 1790-92, the corps was again actively employed, having taken
part in the siege and capture of Bangalore, the battle of Arikera, the capture of Rahmandrug,
Nandidrug, Savandrug, and other hill forts, and in the final operations before Seringapatam
in February 1792, which led to the submission of Tippu Sultan. In 1793 the corps served at
the siege and capture ot Pondicherry, and in 1795-96 during the operations in Ceylon, when
that island was wrested trom the Dutch. In 1796 detachments served at the reduction of
Amboyna and others of the Spice Islands. In 1799 the corps served at the siege and capture
of Seringapatam. In the following year a detachment was engaged in the operations in
Bullam, and another in the pursuit of Dhoondiah Wagh.
In 1801 a detachment of the corps formed part of the force sent on service to Egypt.
Another detachment was engaged in the operations in Tinnevelly, the leading feature of which
was the siege of Panjalamkoorchy, which was finally captured in May, after the troops had
been repulsed with much slaughter in a previous attack. In the subsequent operations
of that war, and in the operations in Wynaad and Bullum (1801-2) the Pioneers were actively
employed. In the operations of the Mahratta War of 1803-4 the corps had a prominent
share, having been engaged in the capture of Ahmednagar, the battle of Assaye, the capture
of Asirgarh, the battle of Argaum, and the capture of Gawilgarh, Chandore and Galna.
In 1809 a strong detachment of the corps was employed in the Travancore War, and
took part in the storming of the Arambuli lines, and the capture of Kotar and Nagarcoil ;
in the following year another detachment was employed in the reduction of the islands of
Bourbon and Mauritius, and in 1811 a third portion was employed in the conquest of Java.
Detachments of the corps were employed on service in the Southern Mahratta country in
1812-14, and at the surrender of Kurnool in 1815. During the Mahratta War, 1817-19,
portions of the corps was attached to various forces in the field, and were engaged in the
action near Poona on the i6th November 1817, at the battle and capture of Nagpore, at the
battle of Mahidpoor, and at the capture of numerous forts in different parts of the country,
ending with those of Malligaum, Asirgarh, Copaldrug and Rari. In 1824 the ist Battalion
of the corps proceeded on service to Burma, where it was prominently engaged in all the
APPENDIX III 471
operations of the war, distinguishing itself on many occasions, notably at Kemendine, Kaiklu,
Kokain and Prome, and sustaining considerable losses.
After its conversion into Sappers and Miners portions of the corps served in the operations
in Malacca (1832), Kimedy (1833-34), Coorg(i834), Guinsur (1836-37), and Kurnool (1839).
Three companies embarked for China in 1840, and were prominently engaged in the operations
in that country, ending with the storming of Chin-kiang-foo in 1842. In 1840 also one com-
pany proceeded on service to Sindh, and, after serving there, and in Baluchistan and Southern
Afghanistan, until the autumn of 1842, joined the forces in Sindh under Sir Charles Napier,
and was present in the battles of Miani and Hyderabad.
In 1852 two companies embarked for Burma on service, and were engaged in the
operations resulting in the conquest of Pegu. In 1857 one company served during the
operations in Persia, and on the breaking out of the mutiny of the Bengal Army the same
year, companies were attached to various forces in the field, taking part in the operations in
Malwa (actions of Mandisor and Gurariah) and Central India (capture of Rahatgarh, relief
of Saugor, battle of the Betwa, storm and capture of Jhansi, battle of Kunch, and capture of
Kalpi and Gwalior), in the relief of Lucknow in November 1857, and at the siege and capture
of that place on the following March, besides other operations in Oudh.
Two companies proceeded on service to China in 1860, and took part in the capture of
the Taku Forts and the surrender of Pekin. In 1867-68 three companies were employed on
the expedition to Abyssinia, and were present in the action of Arogie and at the storming of
Magdala. In 1875-76 one company was employed in the operations in Perak, in the Malay
Peninsula. During the first phase of the Afghan War (1878-79), three companies of the
corps proceeded on service to that country ; they were employed on the Khaibar line, and
two of them took part in the operations in the Bazar Valley. On the renewal of hostilities in
the autumn of 1879, three other companies proceeded on service to the Khaibar, where they
were employed in various operations until the termination of the war.
In 1882 two companies formed part of the Indian Contingent sent to Egypt to aid in
coercing the rebel Arabi Pasha, and they were present in the battle of Tel-el-Kebir and the
occupation of Cairo. One company formed part of the Indian force sent to Suakin, in the
Eastern Soudan, 'in 1885, and was prominently engaged in the action at Tofrek on the 22nd
March, in which it was distinguished for its steady conduct and its heavy losses.
Towards the end of the same year three companies formed part of the expeditionary
force sent to Burmah, where during the succeeding years they were actively employed in a
variety of operations against Burmese dacoits, and in various frontier expeditions, such as those
to Eastern Karenni (1889), to the Chin-Lushai countries (1890), and the Northern Chin Hills
(1892-93). In 1895, during the operations for the relief of Chitral, one company of the corps
crossed the frontier and was granted an honorary distinction in consequence, but it was not
engaged with the enemy on any occasion. In 1896 a company was detailed to form part of
the Indian force sent to garrison Suakin while the Anglo-Egyptian Army was operating on the
Nile.
A company of the corps formed part of the Malakand force when it was attacked by ' ' the
Mad Mullah " and his following during the Frontier War of 1897, and it was prominently
engaged in the desperate fighting which followed. At a later stage another company was
detailed to form part of the Tirah Force, and was engaged throughout the arduous operations
of that expedition. A company also took part in the expedition against the Bunerwals in
January 1898.
In 1900 one company of the corps formed part of the expeditionary force sent to China.
THE IST MADRAS PIONEERS.
This is the oldest existing native corps, having been formed as far back as the year 1758 from
independent companies which had already been some years on the rolls of the Coast Army.
It was originally designated "The ist Native Battalion "; it was afterwards styled "The ist
Battalion ist Regiment, Madras Native Infantry," and later "The ist Regiment of Madras
Native Infantry." It received its present designation in 1900.
Immediately after its formation the battalion took part in the defence of Fort St George
against the French under Lally (1758-59). In 1763-641116 battalion was employed in the siege
of Madura, held against us by the rebel Subadur Yusuf Khan, and thereafter, until 1767, in
operations against various Chiefs in the Central and Southern Carnatic. In the first war with
Hyder Ali, 1767-69, the battalion took part in the battles of Changama (where it highly dis-
tinguished itself), Trinoma Singarapettah, and Malwagal. In 1772 the corps served on the
472 APPENDIX IH
expedition against the Marawar Chiefs of Ramnad and Caliacoil, and in 1773 ^ was at tne
capture of Tanjore. In 1778 the grenadier companies were at the siege of Pondicherry.
In the second war with Hyder All (1780-84) the battalion became involved in one of the
most terrible disasters that has ever befallen the British arms in India : it formed part of the
detachment under the command of Colonel Baillie which was cut off and annihilated by
Hyder Ali at Palilur in September 1780. Having been reformed at Tanjore in 1781, the
battalion again took the field in 1783, and was engaged at the capture of Caroor, Avara-
koorchy, Dindigal, Darapuram, Panjalamkoorchy, Palghat cherry, and various other forts.
In the third Mysore War, 1790-92, the battalion was again actively employed, taking part in
the capture of Erode, the battle of Satimangalum, the siege and capture of Bangalore, the
advance on Seringapatam, the battle of Arikera, the operations in the Baramahal (including
the storming of Penagra and the attack on Kistnagherry), and in the battle under the walls of
Seringapatam leading to the submission of Tippu Sultan.
In 1793 the battalion was employed at the siege of Pondicherry, and in 1795 on ^e
expedition to Ceylon, resulting in the wresting of that island from the Dutch. In 1799 the
battalion took part in the last Mysore War, including the action at Malavelly and the storm-
ing of Seringapatam, when Tippu was slain. Subsequently (1799-1800) it was engaged in the
pursuit of the notorious Dhoondiah Wagh. In 1802-3-4 the battalion was employed in the
arduous operations in Bullum and the Chittoor Pollams. In 1806 six companies of the
battalion became involved in the celebrated Vellore Mutiny, in consequence of which both
battalions of the ist Regiment were disbanded, and a new regiment of two battalions, which
was numbered the 24th, was raised to replace them. In this regiment the faithful remnants
of the old ist were incorporated.
In 1812-14 the Ist Battalion of the 24th was engaged in operations in the Southern
Mahratta country. In 1817, on the outbreak of the Mahratta-Pindari War, the battalion was
at Nagpore, near which place on the 26th November it took part in the battle of Sitabaldi,
and so highly distinguished itself that as a reward the two battalions of the 24th were per-
mitted to take their old place in the line as the ist and 2nd Battalions of the ist Regiment.
Subsequently the battalion (the ist of the ist Regiment) took part in the battle and capture of
Nagpore, and in the sieges and capture of Chanda, Compta and Asirgarh. In 1826 the
corps (which was now the ist Regiment of Madras Native Infantry) proceeded on service
to Burma.
In 1852-53 the regiment was again employed in Burma, and was engaged in the action at
Beeling. In 1855-56 it was on service in Kimedy ; and in 1857-58, on the mutiny of the Bengal
Army, it was actively employed against the rebels and mutineers in the Saugor and Nurbudda
territories, taking part in the action of Kabrai, in the battle of Banda, and in various other
operations.
In the autumn of 1879, on the renewal of the war in Afghanistan, the regiment pro-
ceeded on service to the North-West Frontier. During the following year, until the
termination of the war, it was employed on the Khaibar line, and was engaged in various
minor operations there. In 1884 a portion of the regiment (which had been made a pioneer
corps in the previous year) was employed in the Zhob Expedition, and in the autumn of 1885,
on the outbreak of the war in Burma, it proceeded on service to that country, where, during
the succeeding year, it was actively employed against both the Burmese and the wild tribes on
the frontiers of Burma. In 1900 the regiment proceeded on service to Northern China.
THE 20TH MADRAS INFANTRY.
This regiment was raised at Tanjore in the year 1777 as the " 2ist Coast Native
Battalion." It was afterwards known for some years as "The 2nd Battalion of the 2nd
Madras Native Infantry." It acquired its present designation in 1886.
The first service of the battalion was at the siege and capture of Pondicherry in 1778.
When the war with Hyder Ali broke out in 1780 the battalion was with the main Army under
Sir Hector Munro. The grenadier companies formed part of the force detached under the
command of Colonel Fletcher to reinforce the detachment under Colonel Baillie, and were
involved in its destruction at Palilur. In 1781, under the command of Sir Eyre Coote, the
battalion was present at the capture of Caranguli and Tiruvadi and the battles of Porto Novo,
Palilur (2nd), Shorlingarh (where it greatly distinguished itself, capturing one of the enemy's
standards), and Virakandalur ; in 1782 at the relief of Vellore and the battle of Ami ; and 'in
1783 at the forcing of the French lines before Cuddalore, the repulse of the sortie from that
place, and the capture of Palghatcherry.
APPENDIX III 473
In the Mysore War of 1790-92 the battalion took part in the operations in the Baramahal,
the siege and capture of Bangalore, the capture of Ramgherry, near Savandrug, and the
battle before Seringapatam (February 1792), which eventually led to the surrender of Tippu
Sultan ; in this last engagement the battalion gained much distinction. In 1798 it formed
part of the force at Hyderabad which enforced the surrender of Raymond's French
Contingent, and in the following year it took part in the last Mysore War, including the
action of Malavelly and the siege and capture of Seringapatam. It afterwards took part in
the capture of Gooty, and in 1800 the flank companies were engaged in the pursuit of
Dhoondiah Wagh.
In the Mahratta War of 1803-4 it was present at the reduction of Asirgarh, the battle of
Argaum, the siege and capture of Gawilgarh, the operations in Kandeish, and the capture of
Chandore, Lasulgaum, Galna, and other forts. In 1813-14 the battalion was on service in
the Southern Mahratta country, and in the years 1816-18 it was employed in protecting
Kimedy, Gumsur, and Ganjam from the incursions of the Pindaris.
The regiment (which was now the 2oth Madras Native Infantry) was employed in 1834 in
the conquest of Coorg, and in 1844-45 it took part in the operations in the Southern
Mahratta country, including the capture of the forts of Punalla, Pawangarh, Monohar and
Mausantosh.
More than forty years elapsed before this regiment was again employed on field service.
Having proceeded to Burma at the end of 1889, it was engaged in some of the operations
against the tribes which had not yet been brought into submission, and in 1891 it was
employed in the Wantho Expedition.
THE 2ND BATTALION MOPLAH RIFLES.
This regiment was raised in Trichinopoly in 1794 as ' ' The 35th Coast Native Battalion. "
It was afterwards known for many years as "The ist Battalion of the i3th Madras Native
Infantry," and as " The 25th Regiment of Madras Native Infantry." Its present designation
was conferred upon it in 1902.
The first service of the battalion was in the expedition to Ceylon in 1795-96, when tha
island was wrested from the Dutch. The grenadier companies of the battalion were
employed in Mysore during the war in 1799, and subsequently the battalion was employed
against the Southern Polygars, including the capture of Panjalamkoorchy, after the first
attack on it had been repulsed. In 1801 the battalion was engaged in the second siege and
capture of Panjalamkoorchy, followed by some months of arduous operations in the jungles
of Tinnevelly and Madura.
In 1805 the battalion was engaged in operations in Wynaad, and in 1809 in the Travancore
War, including the storming of the Arambuli lines, and the capture of Cotar and Nagarcoil.
In 1812 two companies were employed in operations in Wynaad, and in 1812-14 the battalion
served during the operations in the Southern Mahratta country. In 1817-18 the corps was
employed in defending Guntoor from Pindari incursions.
In 1878, when an Indian force was sent to the Mediterranean, in connection with the
Russo-Turkish War, this regiment was one of those selected to form the force, and proceeded
to Malta accordingly, and afterwards to Cyprus. In 1885, on the outbreak of the last
Burmese War, the regiment formed part of the expeditionary force sent to that country,
where it continued on service until 1887. In 1901-2 the composition of this regiment under-
went a complete change, the existing material being mustered out and Moplahs (properly
Mapplilas) substituted.
THE BODY-GUARD OF THE GOVERNOR OF BOMBAY.
In 1865, it was proposed to form a separate Body-Guard for the Governor of Bombay, as
in Bengal and Madras, and this being sanctioned, advantage was taken of the disbandment of
the Southern Mahratta Horse to retain one troop of selected men for the purpose indicated.
Since its formation this Body-Guard has been engaged entirely in performing the peaceful
duties of an escort for the Governor. It has had no opportunity of service in the field.
THE IST (THE DUKE OF CONNAUGHT'S OWN) BOMBAY LANCERS.
This regiment was raised in November 1817, at the beginning of the Mahratta-Pindari
War. It was originally styled "The ist Regiment of Bombay Light Cavalry"; was after-
wards equipped as a lancer regiment ; and received its present designation in 1890.
474 APPENDIX III
In 1819 the regiment was engaged in the expedition to Cutch, and was present at the
capture of Bhuj ; and in the following year it took part in the capture of Dwarka, in
Okamandal. Between 1824 and 1837 the regiment was employed on various desultory
services against petty insurgents and marauders, in Rajputana, Kathiawar, and the Deccan.
In 1838 it was selected to form part of the Bombay Column in the Afghan Expedition, and it
was present at the capture of Ghazni and the occupation of Kabul. In 1848 the regiment
was detailed to form part of the Bombay Division employed in the Punjab, and it served at
the siege and capture of Mooltan in 1849.
The regiment was at Nasirabad when the mutiny of the Bengal troops there took place in
May 1857. From the spring of 1858 it was employed against the rebels and mutineers in
Central India and Rajputana, and it took part in the reduction of Awah and Kotah, the
battle of Kotah-ki-Serai and the capture of Gwalior, the battle of the Banas, and the actions
of Pauri, Sindwaho, Karai, and Kundri.
In 1884 a squadron of the regiment was employed with the Zhob Expedition. In 1886
the regiment proceeded on service to Burmah, where it was employed in various operations
until the spring of 1888, and in 1896 it formed part of the force sent to Suakin, to hold that
place while the Anglo-Egyptian Army was engaged on the Dongola Expedition.
THE 3RD (THE QUEEN'S OWN) BOMBAY LIGHT CAVALRY.
This regiment was raised in 1820. It acquired its present designation in 1876.
In 1824 it took part in the reduction of Kittoor. In 1835 and again in 1838 it was em-
ployed on field service in the Mahi Kanta, and in 1840 it proceeded to Sindh. In February
1841 it was engaged at the reduction of Kajak, near Sibi, where its commandant fell mortally
wounded, and in the following year it joined General Nott's force at Kandahar, with which it
moved northwards in August 1842 ; during this movement it was engaged with the enemy
at Oba, Goaine, Beni Badam, and Maidan, and took part in the capture of Ghazni and the
occupation of Kabul. Returning to India by the Khaibar route, it proceeded to Sindh,
where, in March 1843, it was present at the battle of Hyderabad. In 1856 the regiment pro-
ceeded on service to Persia, and was present at the capture of Reshire (where its commanding
officer was killed), the occupation of Bushire, and the battle of Khushab (February 1857),
where it greatly distinguished itself.
Early in 1858 the headquarters and right wing joined the Central India Field Force
under Sir Hugh Rose, and was prominently engaged with the mutineers throughout the
brilliant Central India campaign, including the capture of Jhansi, the battle of Kunch, and
the capture of Kalpi and Gwalior. During the same period the left wing was with the column
under the command of Sir John Michel, and was present in the action at Sindwaho.
In 1867-68 the regiment was employed in Abyssinia, and was present at the capture of
Magdala. In 1880 the regiment proceeded on service to Afghanistan. It formed in July
1880 a part of the force under the command of General Burrows, and was involved in the
defeat at Maiwand. It subsequently took part in the defence of Kandahar, in the action of
Deh Khojah, and in the defeat of Ayub Khan in the action near Kandahar on the ist Septem-
ber 1880. In 1900 the regiment proceeded on service to China.
THE BOMBAY SAPPERS AND MINERS.
This corps was formed in 1826 as an adjunct of the corps of Bombay Engineers, and
originally consisted of only two companies. Prior to this date there had been in existence a
body of pioneers that had been raised during the last decade of the eighteenth century, and
had on many occasions rendered excellent service.
In 1799 a portion of this corps of pioneers formed part of the force with which General
Stuart advanced into Mysore. It was present at the battle of Sidasir in Coorg, but does not
appear to have gone on to Seringapatam ; in the autumn of the same year it served at the
siege of Jamalabad in Canara. In 1800-1 portions of the corps took part in the operations
in Wynaad. A detachment served in Guzerat in 1802, and during 1803-4 four hundred of the
corps were employed in Wynaad and Cotiote.
During the Mahratta War of 1817-19 the Bombay Pioneers were actively engaged in the
action of the Moottah-Moollah (i6th and I7th November 1817) and the occupation of Poona ;
at the reduction of Karnalla, Uchetgarh, Logarh, Raigarh, and various other forts in the
Konkan ; and finally at the siege and capture of Asirgarh. In 1820 a detachment was em-
ployed at the reduction of Dwarka in Okamandal, and a company formed part of the force
APPENDIX III 475
employed against piratical Arab tribes in North-Eastern Arabia and the Persian Gulf in the
spring of 1821, and was present in the battle of Beni-boo-Ali (2nd March).
The first important service on which the corps of Sappers and Miners was engaged was
the campaign of 1838-39 in Afghanistan, in which one company was employed, and was pre-
sent at the storm and capture of Ghazni, the occupation of Kabul, and the storm and capture
of Kalat. Detachments were employed during the operations in the Southern Mahratta
country in 1844-45, and were present at the capture of various forts. During the campaign
of 1848-49 in the Punjab, two companies of the corps were employed, and were engaged at
the siege and capture of Mooltan and the battle of Goojerat.
Two companies took part in the campaign in Persia in 1856-57, and were present at the
capture of Reshire, the occupation of Bushire, the battle of Khushab, and the bombardment
of Mohamra. In 1857-58, during the Mutiny campaigns, detachments of the corps served
with the various field forces in Malwa and Central India, and took part in the capture of
Kotah, Rahatgarh, and Garrakota, the action in the Madanpur Pass, the siege and storm of
Jhansi and Lohari, the battle of Kunch, the capture of Kalpi, the battles of Kotah-ki-serai,
Morar, and Gwalior, and the capture of Gwalior. In 1858 one company was employed in
the operations against the Arabs at Sheik Othman, near Aden, and in the autumn of 1859 a
detachment was employed with the Okamandal Field Force.
In 1867-68, four companies formed part of the expeditionary force sent to Abyssinia.
During the war of 1878-80, several companies of the corps were employed in Afghanistan.
One company (No. 2) was present in the disastrous engagement at Maiwand in July 1880, and
behaved heroically, suffering heavy loss. This company subsequently took part in the
defence of Kandahar (including the Deh Khojah sortie, in which it again suffered severely)
and in the battle of the ist September.
On the outbreak of the war with Burma in 1885, one company of the corps formed part
of the field force sent thither, and it continued there, engaged in various operations, until
1887. In 1890 a detachment of the corps was employed in Somaliland, and was engaged in
the action at Hussain Zariba.
During the war of 1897 two companies of the corps were employed on the North-West
Frontier, and one or other of these was engaged in the relief of the Samana posts, the opera-
tions in Kurrum, and the operations of the Malakand Field Force against the Mohmands and
Mamands in Bajaur. Both companies were employed in the Tirah Expedition, and were
present at the forcing of the Sampagha and Arhanga passes, the operations in the Maidan
of Tirah and in the Waran Valley, the operations against the Chamkannis, and the expedition
into the Bazar Valley. In 1898 a detachment was employed in Mekran and was present in
the action at Gok Parosh. In 1901 one company accompanied the Expeditionary Force sent
to China, and in the summer of the following year half a company took part in the expedition
from Aden which captured and destroyed Fort Addareja after a smart fight. In December
1901 a detachment of the corps was employed in Mekran, and was engaged in the capture of
Nodiz Fort.
THE IST BOMBAY GRENADIERS.
This regiment was formed in November 1779, of volunteer draughts from seven different
corps, viz., from the ist, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th Native Battalions, which each contributed a
complete grenadier company, and the Marine Battalion, which gave two complete companies.
It was largely composed of men who had in the earlier part of the year served under the
celebrated Captain (afterwards Major-General) James Hartley in covering the retreat from
Talagaum, when, for some days prior to the disgraceful convention of Wargaum, they had
borne with splendid valour, though with heavy loss, the whole weight of the attacks of a
Mahratta army fifty thousand strong. It was at first styled "The Grenadier Battalion," but
this title was soon after changed to "The 8th Battalion " ; a few years later its former designa-
tion was restored to it, and after having at different periods been styled " The ist Battalion
or Bombay Grenadiers," "The ist or Grenadier Battalion of the ist Regiment, Bombay
Native Infantry," and "The ist or Grenadier Regiment of Bombay Native Infantry," it
received its present designation in 1901.
Immediately after its formation the battalion was despatched to Guzerat, where it joined
the forces under the command of General Goddard, and, early in 1780, served at the capture
of Dabhoi and the storming of Ahmadabad. It was afterwards sent down to the Konkan,
where it served in the operations at Kallian and Mallangarh, in covering the siege of Bassein,
and at the battle of Dogaur (December 1780).
476
APPENDIX III
At the end of 1781 the battalion formed part of a force detailed for the relief of Tellicherry,
then closely besieged by Hyder Ali's forces, and took part in the rout of the enemy before thai
place on the 8th January 1782, and subsequently in the capture of Calicut. In the autumn ol
the same year it took part in the movement on Palghatcherry, and greatly distinguished itseli
in the battle of Paniani (28th November).
In January 1783 the battalion joined the Army under the command of Brigadier-Genera
Mathews, and with it was present at the capture of Kandapur, the forcing of the Hassan-
gharri Pass, and the capture of Bednore (27th January). Shortly after, it was again brought
below the Ghats to operate against Mangalore, which surrendered on the 9th March, and
being left in garrison there, it took part in the memorable defence of that place against Tippu
Sultan and his French allies, from May 1783 to January 1784. In recognition of its gallantry
in the defence of Mangalore, the title of " The Bombay Grenadiers" was restored to the
battalion in 1784.
In 1790, on the outbreak of the third Mysore War, the battalion was despatched on
service to the southward as part of a force under the command of Colonel Hartley, and took
part in the battle of Tervanangharri (8th December), and the capture of Trincalore and
Ferokhabad. In 1791 and again in 1792 it took part in General Abercromby's advances into
Mysore, and in the operations at Seringapatam (February 1792), which compelled Tippu to
submit. In 1795 the battalion took part in the capture of Cochin from the Dutch, and in 1796
in the conquest of Ceylon. In 1799 the battalion was employed in the reduction of Jamalabad
in Canara, the last of Tippu's forts to surrender. In 1802 the battalion was engaged in the
operations in Guzerat, and was present in the battle and capture of Karri (3Oth April), and in
the siege and capture of Baroda (December).
In 1803, on the breaking out of the Mahratta War, the battalion was employed in the
siege and storming of Baroach, in Guzerat. It took part in the arduous campaigns of 1803-4
in Guzerat and Malwa, and, moving up to Hindustan in February 1805, it joined Lord Lake
before Bhartpur, and in the third and fourth assaults on that fortress it greatly distinguished
itself. In 1808 the battalion was engaged in operations in the Bhir District, Nizam's
Dominions, and in 1809 it served in the campaign in Kathiawar, taking part in the storming
of the strong fort of Mallia. In 1818-19 the battalion was engaged in the operations against
the Pindaris and Mahrattas, and took part in the siege and capture of Asirgarh.
The regiment was not again engaged on service in the field until the year 1838. At the
end of that year it proceeded to Sindh as part of a reserve to the troops proceeding to
Afghanistan, and in August 1840 it was engaged in an attempt to relieve Kahan, in the
Marri Hills, but experienced a disastrous repulse in the Nafusk Pass, sustaining a loss of 86
killed and 62 wounded. In 1843 the regiment served under Sir Charles Napier in the conquest
of Sindh, and was present in the battle of Hyderabad (24th March). In 1859 the regiment
was employed against Waghers in the Burda Hills.
In 1880 the regiment proceeded on service to Afghanistan, and on the 27th July was
involved in the terrible disaster at Maiwand, in which it lost 366 officers and men killed and
61 wounded. The remnants of the corps retreated to Kandahar, and subsequently took part
in the defence of that place and in the battle of the ist September. At the end of 1885 the
regiment proceeded on service to Burma, and rendered good service against the Shan rebels
in the Shwegyin district. It returned to Bombay in 1887, since which date it has not been
employed in the field.
THE 3RD BOMBAY LIGHT INFANTRY.
This corps, though now numbered the 3rd, is, with the exception of the 8th, the oldest
corps in the Bombay Army, having been formed as far back as the year 1768, when the
battalion organisation was first introduced into that army in supersession of the system of
independent companies, which had existed for a great many years so far as the sepoy forces
were concerned. It was originally designated " The 2nd Battalion "; it was afterwards known
for many years as " The ist Battalion, 2nd Regiment, Bombay Native Infantry," and later as
" The 3rd Bombay Native Infantry." It received its present designation in 1901.
The first service of the battalion was at the siege and capture of Baroach in 1772, on
which occasion General Wedderburn, the Commander-in-Chief of the Bombay Army, was
killed. In September 1780, during the war with the Mahrattas, the regiment was at first
engaged in the operations near Kallian and Mallangarh, and afterwards in covering the
siege of Bassein, which led to the Battle of Dogaur. At the end of 1781 it was sent to
Tellicherry as part of a force for the relief of that place, then besieged by Hyder Ali's forces,
and was engaged in the action of the 8th January 1782, in which the enemy were completely
APPENDIX III 477
routed, and afterwards at the capture of Calicut, the attempt on Palghatcherry, and the
battle of Paniani (28th November).
In January 1783 the battalion joined the force under the command of Brigadier-General
Mathews at Honowar, but having been left at Rajamandrug when Mathews moved on
Bednore, it escaped the unhappy fate of that force. During the succeeding months it was
employed in reducing the enemy's fortified places between Honowar and Goa, and except
that it at first met with a severe repulse at Sewdesheogarh, near Carwar, was completely
successful in its operations, in the course of which much fighting occurred. When the third
Mysore War broke out in 1790, the battalion formed part of the force under General Aber-
cromby which defeated Tippu Sultan's troops at Cannanore and captured that place and
Billiapatam. In 1791 and 1792 it took part in the movements (through Coorg) on Seringa-
patam, and was present in the successful operations at that place in February 1792. In 1799,
on the outbreak of the last Mysore War, the battalion formed part of the force which moved
up from Cannanore under General Stuart, and was present in the battle of Sidasir and in the
siege and capture of Seringapatam.
In 1817-18 the battalion took part in the Pindari-Mahratta War, and was engaged in the
action of the Moottah-Moollah (i6th and I7th November 1817), the occupation of Poona, the
pursuit of the Peshwa, and various other operations. In 1819 the battalion was engaged in
the expedition against the Arab pirates of the Persian Gulf, and was present at the capture of
Ras-al-Khaima and Zaya. In November 1820 some companies of the battalion formed part
of a detachment which, by the mismanagement of a political officer, was brought into conflict
with the Beni-boo-Ali Arabs, by whom it was overpowered and cut to pieces. This event
led in the following year to the despatch of an expedition against this tribe, who were totally
routed at Beni-boo-Ali on the 2nd March 1821, with such heavy loss that the tribe was
almost extinguished.
In 1824, the regiment was engaged in the siege and capture of Kittoor, near Dharwar.
In 1848-49 the regiment served during the Punjab campaign, and was engaged in the siege and
capture of Mooltan, the battle of Goojerat, and the pursuit of the Sikhs and Afghans to
Peshawar. In December 1849 it took part in an expedition against the hill tribes on the
Peshawar border. In 1857 the light company served in the expedition to Persia, and was
present at the bombardment of Mohamrah. In 1867 the regiment was employed in the
expedition to Abyssinia. During the Frontier War of 1897-98 the regiment took part in the
operations against the Bunerwals.
THE 24TH (THE DUCHESS OF CONNAUGHT'S OWN) BALUCHISTAN INFANTRY.
This regiment was raised in 1820, and was originally styled "The 2nd Battalion, I2th
Bombay Native Infantry." It received its present designation in 1901.
It first saw service in the field in January 1839, when it took part in the capture of Aden.
In 1857-58 during the suppression of the mutiny of the Bengal Army, the regiment
formed part of the Central India Field Force, and was actively engaged in the operations for
the suppression of the rebellion, having taken a part in the siege and capture of Rahatgarh,
the capture of Gurrakota, the battle of the Betwa and the siege and storming of Jhansi, the
battles of Kunch and Golowlie, the capture of Kalpi and Gwalior, and the pursuit of Tantia
Topi.
In 1880, in consequence of the disaster at Maiwand, the regiment proceeded on service to
Afghanistan with the force moved up to Kandahar under the command of General Phayre,
but it was not engaged with the enemy, the war having been brought to a termination before
it could reach Kandahar, by the defeat of Ayub Khan near that place by Sir Frederick
Roberts.
In 1891 the constitution of the regiment was entirely changed, the existing components
being mustered out, and replaced by better fighting material from Baluch and other border
races. In 1896 the regiment was selected to proceed on service to the British possessions
in East Africa, where it rendered excellent service against the Mazrui rebels.
THE 29TH (THE DUKE OF CONNAUGHT'S OWN) BALUCH INFANTRY.
This regiment was raised in 1846 as a local corps for service in Sindh and on the Sindh
Frontier. It was originally styled "The 2nd Baluch Battalion"; it received its present
designation in 1901.
4/8
APPENDIX III
The battalion was detailed in 1856 to form part of the expeditionary force sent on
service to Persia, and it took part in all the operations in that country, including the landing
at Hallilah Bay, the assault and capture of Reshire, the occupation of Bushire, the movement
to Borazjoon, and the battle of Khushab.
On the outbreak of the Afghan War in 1878, the regiment was detailed to form part of a
force assembled at Quetta, which moved into Southern Afghanistan when the general advance j
took place. It, or portions of it, took part in the actions of Takht-i-pul and Sir-i-asp, the '
occupation of Kandahar, the expedition to Girishk, the actions of Khushk-i-nakhud and Kaj-
baz, the occupation of Kalat-i-Ghilzai, the march to Kandahar, and the battle near that place
on the ist September 1880.
In 1882 the regiment formed part of the force sent to Egypt for the suppression of the
rebel Arabi Pasha, and took part in the battle of Tel-el-Kebir, the advance on Zag-a-Zig, and
the occupation of Cairo.
THE IST LANCERS, HYDERABAD CONTINGENT.
This regiment was formed in the year 1826 by the amalgamation, on a general reorganisa-
tion of the Nizam's Forces taking place, of a number of risallahs which had been in existence
for some years, and was then designated "The ist Regiment of Cavalry, Nizam's Army."
For years after its formation the regiment was engaged from time to time in desultory
operations against insurgents or marauders in various parts of the Nizam's dominions. In
1828 it took part in the reduction of Danduti, held by 300 Arabs and Sidhis, and in 1833 a
squadron was employed in the suppression of the rebel Ghatti Khan and in the capture of his
fort of Nanund.
In September 1841, the regiment was employed in the capture of a body of Arabs who
had taken up a position in a fort near Afzalpur, and in the reduction of the fort of Badami.
In December a wing took part in the defeat of a large body of Rohilla insurgents at Jamode.
In 1854 the designation of the Nizam's Army was changed, and the regiment became " The
ist Regiment of Cavalry, Hyderabad Contingent."
In 1857, on the outbreak of the mutiny of the Bengal Army, the regiment proceeded on
service against the rebels and mutineers in Malwa and Central India, and was engaged in the
battles of Mandisor and Gurariah, the action on the Madanpur Pass, the capture of Chanderi,
the siege and capture of Jhansi, the battles of the Betwa and Kunch, the capture of Kalpi,
the battle of Morar, and the capture of Gwalior, greatly distinguishing itself on numerous
occasions. Subsequently a portion of the corps was engaged in the pursuit of Tantia Topi.
The regiment has not since been employed in any operations in the field. In 1891 the
regiment was designated "The ist Lancers, Hyderabad Contingent."
THE IST INFANTRY, HYDERABAD CONTINGENT.
This regiment was raised at Hyderabad in 1812, as the ist battalion of a force of two
battalions of infantry with a detail of artillery attached, which was styled "The Russell
Brigade " in honour of the then British resident. These were the first corps of the Nizam's
Army that were equipped and disciplined like the Sepoy regiments of the Company's Army,
and they were formed out of existing corps of less regular organisation.
In 1817, on the outbreak of the Pindari-Mahratta War, the Russell Brigade was placed
in the field as part of the army of the Deccan, and it suffered considerable loss in the battle
of Mahidpur (2ist December 1817). In 1818 it was at the siege of Maligaum, and in January
1819 at the siege and capture of Nowan, which was not taken without considerable loss. In
1826, on a general reorganisation of the Nizam's forces taking place, the designation of the
regiment was changed to "The ist Regiment of Infantry, Nizam's Army."
Since the termination of the Pindari-Mahratta War the regiment has seen much desultory
service within the Nizam's dominions, in the suppression of disturbances, the pursuit of bands
of marauders, and the reduction of the strongholds of petty insurgents. In 1829 the regiment
was employed in the reduction of Mudgal, the Killadar of which had refused to surrender the
fort to the Nizam's officers. In December 1841, the regiment took part in the defeat at
Jamode of a large body of Rohilla insurgents, the fort at that place being at the same time
taken by storm. In 1848 the regiment was employed in the suppression of the insurrection at
Shorapur, and in 1852 in the defeat and capture of a body of Rohillas at Paluncha. In 1854,
the designation of the Nizam's army was altered, and the regiment became "The ist
APPENDIX III 479
Regiment of Infantry, Hyderabad Contingent." In 1858-59 the regiment was employed in
the pursuit of the rebel Tantia Topi.
Since the mutinies the regiment has not been employed in any operations in the field.
THE MERWARA BATTALION.
This battalion was raised in 1822, and was originally, and for a great many years after
its formation, what was termed a "Civil" corps, i.e. it was at the disposal of the Civil
authorities for police and similar duties, and was in no way under the control of the
Commander-in-Chief. For many years it was engaged in purely police duties, and it was not
until the outbreak of the Mutiny in 1857 that it came into any sort of notice. The Bengal
troops in Rajputana mutinied like their brethren in other parts of the country, but the Merwara
Battalion remained staunch, garrisoned the fort (Taragarh) at Ajmere, which contained the
arsenal for all Rajputana, and in saving that saved all that part of the country. Nor was all
their service purely passive like the above ; detachments took the field against the mutineers,
and were actively engaged in the attack on Awah, and on other occasions.
On the outbreak of the Afghan War in 1878, the battalion was detailed for service with
the Second Division of the Peshawar Valley Field Force, and was employed throughout the
first phase of the war on the Khaibar line, taking part in both expeditions into the Bazar
Valley, and greatly distinguishing itself in the action of Kam Dakka.
The Colonial Office, with the best will in the world, has not been able, for
reasons which are obvious, to supply me with an historical account of the Colonial
and Local Imperial Forces which came to England for the Coronation similar
to the foregoing memorandum prepared by Lord Curzon's Military Secretary
on the subject of the Indian Contingent.
It may however be interesting to note that detachments of "Colonial
Forces" were sent from the Dominion of Canada, the Australian Common-
wealth, New Zealand, Cape Colony, Natal, Rhodesia, North Borneo (Native),
Ceylon (European and Native), Cyprus, Fiji (Native), Gambia and Sierra
Leone (Native), Gold Coast (European and Native), Hong-Kong (European),
Jamaica (Native), Lagos (Native), N. and S. Nigeria (Native), Straits Settle-
ments and Federated Malay States (European and Native), Trinidad (European
and Native), and Uganda (Native). Of " Local Imperial Forces," Barbados,
Ceylon, Hong-Kong, Jamaica, Mauritius, Sierra Leone, Singapore and Wei-
hai-wei sent Native contingents ; Bermuda, a contingent of Europeans and
Natives ; and Malta, a large contingent of Maltese officers and men.
INDEX
N.B. — The mention is so frequent in the text of King Edward VII.,
Queen Victoria, Coronation, British Empire and Westminster Abbey,
that references to these headings would be too numerous to be of utility
in an Index. The Index relates only to the text of this work and not
to the appendices.
Abbey, E. A., 283.
Abbots of Westminster, 288 ,289.
Abercorn, Duke of, 295.
Abercromby, Sir Ralph, 151.
Abercromby, Speaker, 151.
Aberdeen, 4th Earl of, 125, 159.
Aboukir, 46.
Abyssinia, 249, 250.
Act of Settlement, 13, 210, 220, 280, 281.
Act of Succession, 324, 325.
Act of Supremacy, 324, 325.
Adelaide, 226, 291.
Adelaide, Queen, 312, 314.
Adriatic, 120.
Afghanistan, 101, 227, 254.
Afridis, 227.
Aga Khan, 252.
Agincourt, 313, 324.
Aikin-Sneath, Minor Canon, 243.
Ailesbury, Maria, Marchioness of, 270.
Ainger, Rev. Dr., 288.
Aix-la-Chapelle, 60, 324.
Ajaccio, 49, 53.
Albany, Duchess of, 245.
Albany, Leopold, Duke of, 2O? 245, 289.
Albert, Prince Consort, 19, 23, 125, 131,
140, 207.
Alembcrt, d', 86.
Alexander I., Emperor of Russia, 39, 65,
134-
Alexander II., Emperor of Russia, 39.
Alexander III., Emperor of Russia, 39.
Alexandra, Queen, 4, 229, 248, 249, 283,
284, 286, 306, 311, 313, 314, 315.
Alexandria, 151.
Alfred the Great, 323.
2 H
Algeria, 98.
Alleghanies, 128.
Almacks, 269.
Alsace, 71, 82.
Althorp, Lord, 9, 292.
Alvensleben, General von, 77.
Ambassadors at Coronations, 39, 51, 52, 78,
132-135, 229, 237, 238, 241, 249-252.
America, discovery of, 103, 324.
American War of Independence, 100, 113,
128, 193, 194, 225, 331.
Amiens, Peace of, 51, 113.
Ampthill, Emily, Lady, 78.
Ampulla, 243, 300, 322.
Amsterdam, 60.
Amyot, 161.
Anacharsis, Travels of, 161.
Andrew, Prince of Greece, 249.
Angevin Kings, 259.
Anglesey, 1st Marquess of, 135, 285.
Angouleme, Duchess of, 160.
Anne of Bohemia, Queen, 313.
Anne of Denmark, Queen, 314.
Anne, Queen, 57, 306, 323.
Anointing of Monarchs, 59, 72, 219, 278,
279, 300, 314-
Anson, Hon. A., 315.
Anson, Sir W., 256.
Aosta, Duke and Duchess of, 229.
Argyll, 8th Duke of, 125.
Argyll, gth Duke of, 295.
Aristocracy, Continental, 1 80, 181, 182,
192, 267.
Ark wright, Sir R., 122.
Aries, 101.
Armagh, Archbishop (Alexander) of, 282,
304.
Armstrong, John, 52.
482
INDEX
Arndt, 86.
Arnold, Matthew, 282.
Aryans, 156.
Ascham, Robert, II.
Ascot, 231.
Ashley, Lord, 164.
Ashton-under-Lyne, 167.
Asquith, Right Hon. H., 256.
Atterbury, Dr, no.
Attwood, T., 169.
Augerean, Marshal (Duke of Castiglione),
54, 60.
Augusta Victoria, German Empress, 77.
Augustine, 101.
Austerlitz, 60.
Australia, 4, 82, 99, 100, 113, 119, 128,
157, 158, 218, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226,
2S3, 33°-
Australian Commonwealth, 218, 225, 226,
232, 253.
Austria, 1 6, 36, 40, 41, 59, 60, 66, 67, 71,
91, 134, 229, 250.
Autun, 101.
Auxonne, 44.
Aylesbury, 114.
B
Bach, J. S., 88.
Bacon, 158.
Baden, Grand Duke of, 77.
Bagehot, W., 18.
Baines, E., 168.
Balfour, Right Hon. A. J., 125, 293, 294.
Balkans, the, 91, 249.
Balliol College, Oxford, 146, 147, 256, 282.
Ballooning, 114.
Baltimore, Lord, 1 12.
Bantus, 226.
Barante, 49.
Baronets, 276, 277.
Barotsis, King of, 254.
Bar, The, 180, 181.
Barry, Sir Charles, 147.
Barton, Right Hon. E., 232, 253.
Basing House, 308.
Bastille, 44, 102, 133, 179, 199.
Batavian Republic, 52.
Bath and Wells, Bishop (Kennion) of, 234,
243, 290, 291, 303, 304.
Bavaria, 71.
Bavaria, King of, 72.
Bavaria, Prince Otto of, 77.
Bazeilles, 73.
Beach, Right Hon. Sir M. Hicks-, 254.
Beaconsfield, Earl of (see Disraeli).
Beatrice, Princess (Princess Henry of
Battenberg), 244.
Beauchamp- Walker, General, 78.
Beauharnais, Eugene de, 55.
Becker, 88.
Belgians, Leopold I., King of the, n, 12,
36, 131.
Belgium, 12, 36, 83,91, 118.
Belloy, Cardinal de, 56.
Belsunce, 57.
Benedict XIV., 57.
Benson, Archbishop, 149.
Bentham, Jeremy, 24.
Bentinck, Lord George, 164.
Bentinck, Lord William, 164, 1 68.
Bergen, 46.
Berkeley, Bishop, 115, 150.
Berlin, 22, 42, 76, 85.
Bernadotte family, 36, 54, 229.
Berry, Miss, no.
Berthier (Prince of Wagram), 44, 50, 54,
60, 134.
Biarritz, 68, 69.
Bigge, J. W., 314.
Bikaner, Maharaja of, 252.
Birmingham, 149, 168, 169, 171, 177, 178.
Birth-rate, French, 83, 118.
Birth-rate, German, 83.
Bishops (see Episcopate).
Bismarck, Prince, 67-69, 76-79, 84, 90, 100.
Blackburn, 167.
Black Country, 119.
Black Sea Treaty, 78.
Blanc, Louis, 26.
Blomfield, Bishop, 145.
Blumenthal, General von, 77.
BlundelPs School, Tiverton, 146.
Board of Trade, 162, 273.
Bodleian Library, 130, 265.
Boer War, 4, 100, 223, 224, 225, 295, 308.
Boileau, 75.
Boleyn, Anne, 313, 325.
Bolton, 167.
Bonaparte, Elisa (Mme. Bacciochi, Prin-
cess of Lucca), 49, 51.
Bonaparte, General (see also Napoleon I.),
6,44.
Bonaparte, Hortense (Queen of Holland),
53-
Bonaparte, Jerome, 13.
Bonaparte, Joseph (King of Spain), 52, 53.
Bonaparte, Madame Jerome (Mrs Paterson),
14, 271.
INDEX
483
Bonaparte, Prince Jerome Napoleon, 13.
Bonaparte, Letitia, 44, 53, 127.
Bonaparte, Louis (King of Holland), 45,
Bonaparte, Prince Louis Napoleon (Na-
poleon III.)) 22, 24, 26, 50, 61.
Bonaparte, Prince Napoleon Victor, 13.
Bonaparte, Princess Catherine Frederica,
Bonaparte, Princess Mathilde, 13.
Bond, Right Hon. Sir R., 253.
Booth, Charles, 118.
Borneo, North, 226.
Borrow, George, 115.
Bosphorus, 103.
Boston, U.S.A., 128.
Bothmer, General von, 77.
Boulogne, 50.
Bourbons, the, 22, 37,46, 62, 74, 91, 104,
134-
Bowen, Sir George, 158.
Bradford, 168.
Bradley, Dean of Westminster, 244, 289,
304-
Bradshaw, J., 162.
Brahmins, 226.
Brandenburg, 58, 70.
Brand, Speaker, 309.
Braschi, Cardinal, 56.
Braschi (Pius VI.), 50.
Brassey, T., 106.
Bridge, Sir Frederick, 244, 302.
Bright, Right. Hon. John, 24, 27, 160,
169, 176-179, 180, 210, 211, 272.
Brindisi, I2O.
Brisbane, 226.
Bristol, 150, 170, 173, 176.
" British Common," 330.
Brocklehurst, J., 169.
Brotherton, J., 167.
Brougham, ist Lord, 9, 138, 139, 140.
Bruce, J., 250.
Brumaire, Coup d'Etat of, 45, 133.
Brunelleschi, 104.
Brune, Marshal, 46.
Brunswick, Augusta, Duchess of, 13.
Brunswick, Dukes of, 13, 14.
Brussels, 60, 194, 285.
Bryce, Right Hon. J., 256.
Buccleuch, Duchess of, 314.
Bucher, 76.
Buckingham Palace, 4, 21, 231, 233, 283,
318.
Budapesth, 40.
Buffet, M., 269.
j Bull, Bishop, 150.
! Bulwer-Lytton, E. (ist Lord Lytton), 157,
158.
Burdett-Coutts, Baroness, 16.
! Burdett, Sir F., 162.
i Burke, Edmund, 7, 139, 173, 176, 183,
189.
Burleigh, Lord, 266, 294, 327.
Burma, 296.
Burnet, Bishop, 150.
i Bury, 167.
' Busaco, 134.
i Busby, Dr, 285.
] Busch, 69, 76, 84, 90.
j Bushmen, Australian, 226.
i Butler, Bishop of Bristol and Durham, 150.
i Butler, Bishop of Lichfield, 145.
i Byng, Admiral, 151.
I Byng, George, 151.
Byron, 9, 13, 161, 189.
Cabal, the, 260.
Cadogan, Earl, 293.
Cadoudal, 48.
Calabria, 54.
Cambaceres, 44, 45.
Cambon, M. Paul, 250.
Cambridge, 160, 161, 257, 289, 290.
Cambridge, Adolphus, Duke of, 14, 130.
Cambridge, George, Duke of, 14, 16, 131,
245. 3°6.
Campan, Mme., 5.
Campbell-Bannerman, Right Hon. Sir H.,
255-
Campbell family, 295.
Campeggio, Cardinal, 101.
Campo Formio, Treaty of, 45.
Canada, 4, 28, 99, 102, 113, 119, 128, 137,
142, 159, 167, 218, 222, 223, 224, 225,
226, 232, 253, 264, 295, 330.
Canadian Pacific Railroad, 102, 119, 264.
Canning, George, 151, 173, 183, 189.
Canning, Sir Stratford, 164.
Canterbury, Archbishopric of, 143, 294,
305, 312.
Canterbury, Archbishop (Temple) of, 129,
143, 146, 282, 291, 299-305, 311, 312,
3i6, 317-
Cape Colony, 113, 225, 226, 232, 254, 296.
Cape Comorin, 227.
Capel Court, 181.
484
INDEX
Capital and Labour, 28, 123, 211, 275 (see
also Working Classes).
Capitalist class, 122, 123, 165, 167-169,
172, 177, 178, 180, 181, 186, 187, 188,
211, 214, 215, 216, 217, 256, 272, 273,
274, 275, 276, 309.
Carcassonne, 49.
Cardigan, Earl of, 228.
Cardwell, E. (Viscount Cardwell), 273.
Carlisle, 108.
Carlyle, Thomas, 81, 84, 87.
Carnot, Lazare, 44.
Caroline, Queen, 14, 139, 141.
Carrington, 1st Lord, 179.
Cartwright, E., 122.
Gary, Lucius, Viscount Falkland, 309.
Castiglione, 54, 99.
Castlereagh, Lord, 296.
Catherine of Arragon, 101, 313.
Catherine of Russia, 39, 128.
Catholic Emancipation, 17.
Cavendish family, 190.
Cecil family, 265, 266, 294.
Ceylon, 113, 226, 254.
Chamberlain, Lord Great, 296, 300.
Chamberlain, Right Hon. J., 178, 231, 232,
255, 272.
Champigny, 70, 73.
Charlemagne, 58, 323.
Charles I., 10, 206, 220, 260, 285, 299,
308, 329-
Charles II., 170, 190, 194, 220, 260, 285,
306.
Charles of Denmark, Prince, 284.
Charles of Denmark, Princess (Princess
Maud), 244.
Charles V. , 70, 104, 324.
Charles X. of France, 55, 56, 133, 206.
Charlotte, Archduchess, 12.
Charlotte, Princess of Wales, 10-14, 131.
Chartists, 22, 23, 157, 168, 169.
Cheadle Minor Canon, 243.
Chevalley, Abel, 208.
Chiaramonti, Cardinal (Pius VII.), 49.
Childe Harold, 13, 189.
Chilterns, 114.
China, 252, 297.
Choate, Hon. j., 251.
Choiseul-Praslin, Duchess of, 134.
Cholmondeley, Marquess of, 296.
Christ Church, Oxford, 143, 152, 167, 287.
Christianity, 25, 103, III, 148, 149, 156,
206, 249, 311.
Christian, Princess, of Schleswig-Holstein
(Princess Helena), 244.
Christopherson, Bishop, 279.
Church of England (see also Episcopate),
147, 149, 177, 180, 211, 294.
Church of Ireland, 259, 262, 283, 290.
Church of Scotland, 241, 252.
Cicero, no, 139.
Cinque Ports, Barons of, 287.
Cintra, 134.
Civil Service, 277.
Civis Romanus sum, 156.
Clarence, Duke of (see also William IV.),
14.
Clark, Hewson, 9.
Clarke, Sir Stanley, 298.
Clement VII., 101, 324.
Clery, 3.
Cleveland, 4th Duke of, 180.
Clive, Lord, 112, 128.
Clyde, the, 253.
Cobden, R., 160, 162.
Cobenzl, 52.
Coburg, Alfred, Duke of, 20, 249.
Coburg, Leopold, Duke of, 245.
Coke, Roger, 10.
Coke, Sir Edward, 10.
Coleridge, S. T., 87.
Colin Campbell (Lord Clyde), 277.
Cologne, 60.
Colonial Ministers, 218, 229, 230, 232,
253, 31°.
Colonial Office, 137, 144, 157, \<{g, 162,
163, 232, 255.
Colonial troops, 4, 29, 30, 223, 224, 225,
226, 227, 228, 283, 284, 318.
Colonies, British, 4, 19, 28, 29, 99, 102,
112, 113, 118, 119, 120, 167, 177, 193,
221-230, 232, 247, 253, 254, 307, 310,
318, 321, 330, 331.
Colonisation, British, 29, 99, 112, 128, 137,
140, 141, 142, 167, 232.
Colonisation, French, 97, 98, 99, 112.
Colonisation, German, 91, 97.
Colonisation, Spanish, 112.
Columbus, Christopher, 251, 324.
Combermere, Lord, 135, 285.
Commander-in-Chief, 295.
Commercial classes (see Capitalists).
Committee of Privileges, 180.
Commons, House of, 127, 139, 142,
150-170, 171, 178, 184, 185, 215-218,
254, 255, 256, 271, 272, 273-276, 299,
3"-
Como, Lake, 115.
Concordat, 56.
Conde, 74.
INDEX
485
Connaught, Duchess of, 244.
Connaught, Duke of, 284, 306.
Constable, Lord High, 295.
Constantinople, 164.
Constantinople, Conquest of, 37, 102, 103.
Constituent Assembly, 44, 48.
Constitution, British, 147, 194, 208, 209,
210, 213, 267, 280 (see also Estates of
the Realm, Act of Settlement, etc.).
Consulate, The, 44, 46.
Convention, The, 6, 7, 55, 250.
Conyngham, 2nd Marquess, 196.
Cooch-Behar, Maharajah and Maharanee,
252.
Cook, Captain, 112, 128.
Copernicus, 103.
Copleston, Bishop, 145.
Corinthians, Epistle to, ill.
Corn Laws, 21, 160, 162, 164, 168, 178.
Coronation Chair, 235, 241, 298, 299, 300,
3I4-
Coronation, Form and Order of, 243, 278-
281, 285, 288, 300, 303, 306, 311-315,
322, 323, 329.
Coronation Order of James I., 219, 285,
287, 288, 294, 299, 300, 303, 312, 314,
322, 326.
Coronation Order of William and Mary,
280, 306, 322, 323.
Corporation and Test Act, 17.
Corrcspondance de Napoltton, 44, 50, 52, 59,
64, 65.
Corsica, 44, 49, 133, 134.
Corunna, 115.
Country Gentlemen (see Territorial Classes).
Courcel, Baron de, 269.
Cousin, Victor, 88, 90.
Covenanters, 170.
Cowper, Countess (Viscountess Palmerston),
270.
Cowper, W., 1 10, 189.
Crecy, 310.
Creighton, Bishop Mandell, 150.
Crete, 5.
Crimean War, 24, 39, 91, 159, 164.
Criticism, Higher, 5.
Croker, John Wilson, 17.
Crompton, S., 122.
Cromwell, Oliver, 327, 328.
Crouchback, Edmund, 283.
Crown, British, 13, 14, 18, 19, 21, 28, 97,
99, 123, 129, 156, 159, 193, 200, 201,
2O8, 209, 2IO, 212, 2l8, 237, 238, 264,
267, 268, 276, 28O, 294, 3OI, 307, 308,
316, 321, 322, 323, 324, 328.
Crown Colonies, 254, 331.
Crown, Imperial, 4, 19, 28, 113, 120, 121,
142, 156, 163, 200, 218, 236, 238, 239,
244, 247, 253, 255, 267, 277, 281, 286,
296, 301, 302, 318-331.
Crown, St Edward's, 244, 296, 322.
Cumberland, Duke of (Ernest, King of
Hanover), 14, 16, 17, 18, 245.
Cumberland, Duke of (Prince George of
Denmark), 306.
Curia Regis, 310, 311.
Curtana (Sword of Mercy), 295.
Cust, R. N., 245.
Cyprus, 227, 254.
D
Dacre, Barony of, 309.
Dalmatia (see Soult).
Dalmeny, Lord, 165.
Daniell-Bainbridge, Precentor, 243.
Danton, 6, 106.
Darius, 4.
Dartmouth, Earl of, 282.
Darwin, Charles, 161.
David, J. L., 53, 57.
David, King, 246.
Davidson, Bishop of Winchester (Arch-
bishop of Canterbury) (see Winchester).
Deak, 40.
Deccan, 227.
Deflarationofthe Rights of Man, 26, 105.
Delbriick, 78.
" Delicate Investigation," 9.
Delorme, Philibert, 104.
Democratic en Amtrique, 201.
Demosthenes, 139.
Denison, Speaker, 151.
Denman, ist Lord, 139.
Denmark, 68.
Denmark and Norway, Frederick II., King
of, 314.
Denmark, Anne of (Queen of England),
3H-
Denmark, Crown Prince of, 249.
Denmark, Prince Charles of, 284.
Denmark, Princess Charles of, 244.
Denmark, Prince George of (Duke of Cum-
berland), 306.
Depopulation, 118 (see also Birth-rate).
Derby, Charlotte, Countess of, 270.
Derby, I4th Earl of, 125, 163, 292.
Derby, I5th Earl of, 292.
Derby, i6th Earl of, 292.
486
INDEX
De Ros, Lord, 308, 309, 310.
Devonshire, Duke of, 293.
Devonshire, Georgiana, Duchess of, 159,
192.
Deym, Count, 250.
Dilke, Right Hon. Sir C., 255.
Diplomatic body, 51, 52, 132-135, 229, 237,
238, 241, 250-252.
Directory, The, 45, 47, 55.
Disraeli, B. (Earl of Beaconsfield), 25, 125,
137, 152-157, 158, 159, 162, 163, 164,
174, I75» 176, 270.
Disraeli, Mrs (Viscountess Beaconsfield),
152, 154, 157, 174, 270.
Disraeli, Ralph, 154.
Doddington, Bubb, 179.
Dorington, Sir J., 276.
Dorset, Duke of, 323.
Downing Street, 135, 261.
Drake, Sir F., 112, 266, 327, 330.
Drama, the, 157, 277.
Dryden, 308.
Dual Monarchy, 41, 250.
Dublin, 162, 254.
Duckworth, Canon, Sub-Dean of West-
minster, 143, 244, 289, 296, 301, 304.
Dufferin, 1st Lord, 126.
Dufferin, Marquess of, 127.
Duncannon, 1st Viscount, 136.
Duncombe, Thomas, 157.
Dundas family, 191.
Dundas, Henry, 7.
Dupleix, 129.
Durer, A., 104.
Durham, Bishop (Moule) of, 290.
Durham, 1st Earl of, 137, 142, 167, 191.
Dyaks, 226.
Dymoke, F. S., 288.
Ealdred, Archbishop of York, 311, 312.
Earl Marshal, 241, 295, 296, 297 (see also
Norfolk, Duke of).
Ecclesiastical Titles Bill, 23.
Edinburgh, 102, 151.
Education, 89, 117, 187, 188, 204, 256, 257.
Edward I., 299, 301.
Edward III., 130, 207, 313.
Edward VI., 326.
Edward's, St, Chapel, 243, 315, 316, 322,
323-
Edward, the Black Prince, 298.
Egypt. 45, 46, 296.
Eldon, 1st Earl of, 126, 293.
Eleanor of Castile, Queen, 313.
Eleanore of Provence, Queen, 316.
Electoral Franchise (see also Reform Bill),
172, 173, 176, 178, 179, 194, 204, 275.
Electric force and inventions, 103, lio, in,
122, 206.
Eliot, Very Rev. Dean, 288.
Elizabeth of York, 19.
Elizabeth, Queen, 10, n, 19, 104, 112,
170, 212, 219, 260, 265, 266, 285, 314,
325-329-
Ellenborough, 1st Earl of, 263.
Ellenbo rough, 1st Lord, 9.
Ellis, Sir A., 298.
Ely, Bishop (Lord A. Compton) of, 290.
Enghien, Duke of, 49.
English language, 112, 120, 260, 302, 326,
330-
English scenery, 114-117.
Enos, 240.
Episcopate, English, 142-150, 211, 243, 259,
279, 281, 282, 290, 291, 292, 294, 303.
Erskine, Thomas, 7.
Esher, ist Viscount, 263.
Esher, 2nd Viscount, 263.
Esprit des Lois, 179.
Essex, 5th Earl of, 126, 129.
Essling, 54.
Estates of the Realm, 147, 208, 209, 210,
211, 241, 243, 258, 259, 302, 303-311.
Esterhazy, Prince Paul. 134.
Eton, 152, 160, 167, 187, 188, 245, 285.
Eugenie, Empress, 68.
Euston Grove, 115.
Eutychus, 127.
Evans, Mr A. J., 5.
Evans, Sir De Lacy, 136.
Evelyn's Diary, 280.
Ewart, W., 167.
Exeter, 108, 145, 146.
Exhibition of 1851, 23.
Falkland, 2nd Viscount, 309.
Falkland, I2th Viscount, 308, 309.
Faraday, in, 122.
Faustina, 14.
Ferdinand I. (of Austria), 22.
Ferrar, Bishop, 279.
Ferrieres, 68, 69.
Fesch, Cardinal, 57, 58, 60.
INDEX
487
Feudal system, 122, 311, 313.
Fielden, J. and W., 167.
Fife, Duke of, 295.
Fife, Princess Louise, Duchess of, 244.
Fiji, 226.
Finsbury, 157.
Flag. British, 29, 120, 128.
Florence, 61, 103, 104.
Fontainebleau, 57, 58.
Fortescue, Earl, 264.
Fouche (Duke of Otranto), 50.
Fourier, 26.
Fox, Charles J., 60, 136, 139, 173, 174, 183,
189.
Francis Ferdinand, Archduke of Austria,
229.
Francis I. of France, 324.
Francis II. (Emperor of Germany and
Austria), 51, 59, 71, 134.
Francis Joseph I., Emperor of Austria, 36,
40, 41, 229.
Francis, Saint, of Assisi, 291.
Franco-Austrian War, 67.
Franco-German War, 69-85.
Frankfort, 67, 86.
Franking, 108.
Fraser, Bishop, 149.
Frederick Charles, Prince, of Prussia, 76,
244.
Frederick, Empress, Princess Royal of
England, 20, 21, 76, 249.
Frederick I. (of Prussia), 58, 70.
Frederick II., King of Denmark, 314.
Frederick III. (German Emperor ; Crown
Prince of Prussia), 76.
Frederick the Great, 51, 57, 64, 68, 71, 73,
74, 8 1, 86, 87,93, 128.
Frederick William II. (of Prussia), 64.
Frederick William III. (of Prussia), 51, 64,
82, 88.
Frederick William IV. (of Prussia), 22, 66,
67.
Frederick William (the Great Elector), 71.
Freeman, E. A., 219.
Free Trade, 168, 169.
French Academy, 161.
French Bishops, 55, 56, 57, 143, 146.
French Canadians, 28, 99, 223, 224.
French Institute, 46, 263, 269.
French Republic, 51, 105.
Frere, Rev. W. H., 279.
Friedland, 60, 132.
Frobisher, Sir M., 112, 266, 327, 330.
Froissart, 313.
Frumentius, 250.
Gainsborough, T., 189.
Galerie des Glaces, 74-80.
Galliffet, General de, 68, 69.
Ganges, 319.
Garibaldi, 22.
Garter, Order of the, 289, 292, 300, 314.
Garter's Roll, 259, 261, 269, 271.
Gaselee, Sir A. , 297.
Gell, P. L., 256.
Geneva, 60.
Genoa, 61.
George I., 220, 323.
George I., King of Greece, 248.
George II., 126, 220, 264, 314.
George III., 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 51, 124,
130, 147, 179, 182, 193, 194, 220, 245.
George IV., 14, 18, 125.
George of Denmark, Prince (Duke of
Cumberland), 306.
George, Prince of Greece, 249.
German Confederation, 66, 71, 72.
Germanic League, 74.
German population of Europe, 42.
German unity, 42, 66, 71, 72, 73, 79, 81,
82, 86, 87-89, 90, ico, 200.
Gibbon, E., 181.
Gibson, Right Hon. T. Milner, 162.
Gilray, 60.
Gladstone, Right Hon. H., 255.
Gladstone, Rt. Hon. W. E., 125, 143, 146,
152, 154, 155, 158, 159, 161, 165, 183,
192, 255, 272, 310.
Glasgow, 164, 1 68.
Glenelg, Lord (Charles Grant), 137.
Glenesk, Lord, 263.
Gloucester, Bishop '(Ellicott) of, 282.
Gloucester, Humfrey, Duke of, 1 30.
Gloucester, William Henry, Duke of, 13.
Godavery, 227.
Goethe, 81, 86, 91, 200, 202.
Goodwin, Bishop Harvey, 149.
Gordon, General, 297.
Gore House, 152.
Goschen, Viscount, 263.
Gower, Lord Ronald, 65.
Gow, Rev. Dr, 285.
Grafton, 3rd Duke of, 295.
Grafton, 4th Duke of, 126.
Grafton, 7th Duke of, 295.
Graham, Sir James, 159.
Gramont, Due de, 271.
Granville, 1st Earl, 159.
Granville, 2nd Earl, 159.
488
INDEX
Gravelotte, 73.
Gravina, Admiral, 52.
Gray, T., 189.
" Greater Britain," 255, 329.
Greatorex, Minor Canon, 243.
Greece, 37, 161, 248.
"Greek-play Bishops," 145, 148.
Grenville family, 191.
Grenville, Lord, 136.
Grey family, 191.
Grey, Sir George, 137.
Grey, 2nd Earl, 138, 139, 141, 172.
Grey, 3rd Earl, 1 6, 138, 160.
Grosvenor family, 191.
Grote, G., 161.
Guest, J., 169.
Guizot, F., 183.
Gully, Mr Speaker, 252.
Gurkhas, 227.
Gutenberg, 103.
Guyenne, 298.
Gwalior, Maharajah of, 252.
Haggard, Rider, 118.
Hallam, Henry, 9, 280, 299.
Halsbury, Earl of, 293.
Hamilton, Lady, 66.
Hamilton, Lord Claud, 314.
Hanover, Ernest, King of, 17, 18.
Hanover, George, King of, 245.
Hanover, House of, 10, 13, 115, 190, 210,
279, 280, 314, 330.
Harcourt, Archbishop Vernon, 8, 143, 144,
145, 146, 150, 254.
Harcourt, Lord, 144.
Harcourt Papers (ii.), 8, 144.
Harcourt, Sir W. Vernon, 254.
Hardwicke, Earl of, 260.
Harrow by, 1st Earl of, 1 66.
Harrow-on-the-Hill, 114, 256, 289.
Hartmann, General von, 77.
Hastings, Battle of, 312.
Hastings, Warren, 128, 139.
Hatfield, 116.
Haussas, 226.
Havelock, Sir H., 228.
Hawkesbury, Lord, 51 (see also Liverpool,
Earl of).
Hawkins, 266.
Hayashi, Viscount, 251.
Haynau, General, 23.
Hazaras, 227.
Hegel, 88.
Helena, Princess (Princess Christian of
Schleswig-Holstein), 21, 244.
Henrietta Maria, Queen, 314.
Henri IV., 40.
Henry Bradshaw Society, 219.
Henry, Prince and Princess, of Prussia, 229,
249.
Henry VI., 311.
Henry VII., 19, 280.
Henry VI I. 's Chapel, 243, 316.
Henry VIII., 265, 279, 324, 325, 326.
Henson, Canon, 243, 289.
Herault de Sechelles, 6.
Herbert, Sidney, 158, 293.
Herder, 86.
Hereford, Bishop (Percival) of, 282.
Hereford, Viscount, 309.
Hervey, Rev. Canon, 288.
Hesketh, Lady, no.
Hesse, Alice, Grand Duchess of, 20, 248,
249.
Hesse, Grand Duke of, 248.
Hill, Rowland, 107.
Hill, Viscount, 135.
Hime, Sir A., 254.
Hine Haycock, Minor Canon, 243.
Hobart Town, 226.
Ilohenzollern family, 71, 72, 73, 92.
Holland House, 137.
Holland, Lord, 137.
Holstein-Gottorp, Family of, 37.
Holy Alliance, 29, 62.
Holy Roman Empire, 37, 51, 62, 66, 71,
78, 129, 324.
Homage of Peers, 126, 127, 129, 243, 259,
266, 278, 302, 303, 306, 308-310.
Homer, 158.
Hong- Kong, 227.
Houdon, 55.
Houghton, Lord (Monckton Milnes), 161.'
Howard family, 190, 192, 297.
Howick, Lord (see Third Earl Grey), 16.
Howley, Archbishop of Canterbury, 129,
142, 143, 196.
Hudson Bay, 263.
Hue, Francois, 3.
Hugo, Victor, 64.
Huish, Robert (Memoirs of H.R.H.
Princess Charlotte), 10.
Hume, Joseph, 162.
Hungary, 16, 23, 40, 250.
Hunt, Leigh, 9.
Huron, Lake, 222.
Huskisson, Right Hon. G., 166, 173.
INDEX
489
Idar, Maharajah of, 252.
Idealism, 204, 205, 206.
Ideologues, 46.
Illustrated London News, 24.
Illy, 69.
Imperial Guard, 74.
Imperial idea, II, 19, 21, 30, 43, I2O, 121,
137, 138, 142, 153, 154, 156, 159, 167,
201, 2l8, 22I-23O, 232, 238, 246, 247,
255, 265, 28l, 294, 295, 307, 320, 321,
325-33I-
Inderwick, F. A., K.C., 287.
India, 4, 29, 104, 113, 119, 120, 128, 158,
164, 168, 227, 247, 260, 277, 330, 331.
Indian Army, 4, 29, 227, 228, 283, 284,
3l8, 319.
Indian Nabobs, 182.
Indian Princes, 230, 241, 252, 253, 284.
Ingoldsby Legends, 1 6.
International, The, 26.
Invalides, 50.
Ionian Islands, 158, 291.
Ireland, 162, 179, 254, 255, 283, 294, 325,
328.
Irving, Sir II., 277.
Isabel of France, Queen, 313.
Isabey, 57, 58-
Italy, 36, 67, 83, 115, 229, 250.
Italy, Campaign of, 45.
J
Jaipur, Maharajah of, 252.
James I., 10, 219, 265, 266, 279, 280, 285,
287, 288, 294, 300, 303, 312, 314, 322,
326.
James II., 10, 131, 175, 280, 306, 329.
Japan/42, 251.
Jats, 227.
Jebb, Sir R. C., 256.
Jemappes, 86.
Jena, 60, 64, 68, 70, 74, 80, 82, 87.
Jenkinson, Bishop Bankes, 282.
Jersey, Sarah, Countess of, 270.
Jerusalem Chamber, 243.
Jeune, Right Hon. Sir F., 256.
Jews, in, 155, 156.
Joan of Arc, 309.
Joan of Navarre, Queen, 313.
Josephine, Empress of the French, 53, 55,
56, 58, 65, 134.
Jowett, Rev. B., 256.
Jubilee of Queen Victoria, 29.
Junius, 295.
Juxon, Archbishop, 143.
Kant, 86.
Karolyi, Count, 250.
Kashmir, 227.
Katherine of France, Queen, 313.
Keble College, Oxford, 282.
Keeper, Lord, 294.
Kellermann, Marshal (Duke ofValmy), 54.
Kelvin, Lord, 263.
Ken, Bishop, 150.
Kennington Common, 23.
Kensington Palace, 136, 196.
Kent, 50, 249.
Kent, Duchess of, 20, 131.
Kent, Edward, Duke of, 14, 20, 21, 245.
Kenyon, Lord, 7.
Khyber Pass, 101.
Kimberley, Earl of, 269, 292.
King's Lynn, 164.
Kirchbach, General von, 77.
Kitchener, Viscount, 297.
Knocker, Sir W., 287.
Knollys, Lord, 298.
Knox, John, 252.
Kolhapur, Maharajah of, 252.
Komatsu, Prince, of Japan, 229.
Konigsberg, 58, 65, 70.
Kossuth, 23.
Kremlin, The, 39.
Kutusow, General, 78.
Labour, Organisation of; and Labour
Party (see Working Classes).
Lamartine, 22, 137.
Lambeth Palace, 143.
Lancashire, 166, 176.
Landed interest (see Territorial Class).
Lanfrey, 251.
Lannes, Marshal (Duke of Montebello), 49,
50, 54-
Lansdowne, 1st Marquess of, 136, 260 (see
also Shelburne).
Lansdowne, 3rd Marquess of, 136, 260.
Lansdowne, 5th Marquess of, 260.
Lascelles family, 168, 191.
Lascelles, Hon. E., 314.
Laud, Archbishop, 143.
490
INDEX
Lauderdale, 8th Earl of, 60.
Laurier, Right Hon. Sir W., 232, 253.
Lawrence, SirT., 189, 192.
Lawrences, The, 228.
Lawyers, 180, 181, 182, 217, 273.
Leader,). T., 195.
Lebrun, 74.
Lecky, Right Hon. W. E. H., 177, 256.
Lee, Bishop Prince, 149.
Leeds, 168.
Le Fevre de la Boderie, 10.
Lefevre, Marshal (Duke of Dantzic), 54.
Lehzen, Baroness, 15.
Leicester, 173.
Leicester, 1st Earl of, 126, 127, 264.
Leicester, 2nd Earl of, 264.
Lennox, Lord William, 285.
Leo XIII., 35.
Leonardo da Vinci, 104.
Leopold, Prince of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld
(King of the Belgians), II, 12, 36, 131.
Lepanto, Gulf of, in.
Lessing, 87.
Letter-writing, 106-111.
Leveson-Gower family, 192.
Lewes, Battle of, 309.
Liard, L., 88.
Liber Regalis, 288, 300, 326.
Lichfield, Bishop (Legge) of, 282.
Liddell, Dean, 290.
Lieven, Princess, 15-
Lightfoot, Bishop, 149, 290.
Lilies of France, 130.
Lincoln, Abraham, 42.
Lincoln, Lord, 158.
Lister, Lord, 263.
Litany, 234, 243.
Liverpool, 166, 167, 173.
Liverpool, Earl of, 282.
Livingston, Robert R., 52.
Loir, Dr A. , 99.
Loire, The, 70, 76, 104.
London, 4, 15, 17, 30, 108, 114, 115, 117,
118, 119, 134, 173, 214, 221, 222-230,
232, 233, 235, 236, 237, 239, 283, 285.
London, Bishop (Winnington Ingram) of,
290, 300, 303.
Londonderry, Marquess of, 296, 300.
London, Lord Mayor of, 296.
Longchamp, 79.
Longley, Archbishop and Bishop, 145.
Long, Walter, 162.
Lords, House of, 126, 141, 144, 177, 178,
179, 184, 185, 190, 191, 192, 210-215,
218, 258-269, 302-311.
Lorraine, 83.
Louise, Princess, Duchess of Argyll, 244.
Louise, Princess, Duchess of Fife, 244.
Louise, Queen of Prussia, 65, 66.
Louisiana, 98.
Louis le Debonnaire, 58.
Louis- Philippe, King, 21, 22, 36, 55, 56,
85, 133;
Louis, Prince, of Prussia, 74.
Louis XIV., 50, 70, 71, 74, 80.
Louis XV., 128, 223, 260.
Louis XVI., 3, 45, 48, 54, 55, 62, 65, 75,
132.
Louis XVII., 65.
Louis XVIII., 47, 54, 55, 133, 160.
Lowe, Rt. Hon. R. (Viscount Sherbrooke),
1 60.
Luchesini, Marquis, 51.
Lucknow, 228.
Luke, Saint, 5.
Lumsden, Sir P., 277.
Lytton, Earl, 158, 174.
M
Macaulay, Lord, 58, 151, 152, 160, 164,
1 68, 264, 280.
Macclesfield, 169.
Macclesfield, Earl of, 314.
Macdonald of Earnsclift, Baroness, 295.
Macdonald, Right Hon. Sir John, 295.
Macedonia, in.
Machinery, Industrial. 122, 173, 174, 178.
" Madame Sans Gene," 54.
Magdeburg, 74.
Magee, Archbishop and Bishop, 149, 283.
Magna Charta, 310.
Magnificat, The, 5-
Mahrattas, 227.
Maidstone, 152.
Maintenon, Mme. de, 56.
Malays, 226.
Malmesbury, Lord, 61.
Malplaquet, 57.
Malta, 113, 226.
Manchester, 119, 167, 168.
Manners family, 310.
Manning, Cardinal, 78, 146, 212, 282.
Mansard, 50, 74.
Maoris, 226.
Marcus Aurelius, 14.
Marengo, 99.
Maret (Duke of Bassano), 55.
Margaret of Anjou, Queen, 313.
INDEX
491
Maria da Gloria, Queen of Portugal, 131.
Maria Theresa, Empress of Germany, 16,
57. 127.
Marie Antoinette, 3, 4, 5, 6, 48, 66, 75,
127.
Marie Louise, 48, 66.
Marlborough College, 289.
Marlborough, Duchess of, 315.
Marlborough, Duke of, 296.
Marseillaise, The, 3, 5.
Marseilles, 3, 57.
Mars-la-Tour, 77.
Marx, Karl, 26.
Mary Adelaide, Princess ( Duchess of Teck),
131, 246.
Mary (Queen of William III.)> :9> J9°»
322, 323, 329.
Massena (Duke of Rivoli), 46.
Massillon, 57.
Materialism, 180, 187, 188, 189, 215, 246,
267, 309.
Mater Regutn, 53.
Mathilda, Queen, 311, 313.
Maud, Princess (Princess Charles of Den-
mark), 244.
Maupertuis, 86.
Mauritius, 113.
Maximilian, Archduke, Emperor of Mexico,
12.
Maximilian, Emperor, 324.
May Marriages, II.
Mechanics' Institutes, 140.
Mecklenburg-Strelitz, Grand Duchess of,
131. 245-
Melbourne, 223, 253.
Melbourne, Viscount, 102, 124, 136, 138,
145, 163, 264.
Memorial de Sainte Helhie, 48, 60, 65.
Merthyr-Tydvil, 169, 172.
Metternich, Prince Clement, 22, 71, 134.
Metternich, Prince Wolff, 250.
Metz, 70, 73.
Michael, Hereditary Grand Duke of Russia,
229.
Michael Michailovitch, Grand Duke, 250.
Michel Angelo, 104.
Middle Ages, 103, 219, 313.
Milan, 22, 57.
Mill,J. S., 175.
Milner, Rev. I., 250.
Milner, Viscount, 256.
Milnes, Monckton, 161.
Milton, 161.
" Ministry of All the Talents," 136.
Mirabeau, 48.
Mississippi, 128.
Mitford's Greece, 161.
Molesworth, Sir W., 162, 168.
Moltke, Field-marshal von, 69.
Monarchical idea, 3, 31, 93, 189, 195, 202,
204, 205, 207, 212, 215, 307, 320, 329.
Monarchy of July, 21, 84, 135, 183.
Monasteries, dissolution of, 190, 260.
Aloniteur, The, 51, 52, 58.
Montesquieu, 179, 183.
Montfort, Simon de, 272, 309.
Montgaillard, 50.
Montreal, 102.
Montrose, Duchess of, 314.
Morley, Right Hon. J., 256.
Mountcashell, Countess of, 270.
Mount Stephen, Lord, 295.
Munroe, James, 53.
Murat, Joachim (King of Naples), 36, 54,
228.
Murray, Dr J. A. H., 287.
Musset, A. de, 88.
N
Nantes, Edict of, 75.
Napoleon I., 13, 23, 35, 41, 44-66, 68, 70,
74, 98, 99, 105, 125, 132, 133, 134, 135,
175, 199, 250.
Napoleon III., 12, 45, 50, 61, 65, 67, 68,
70, 71, 92, 133.
Natal, 218, 225, 226, 254.
Naval Review, 319.
Negro Emancipation, 163, 166.
Nelson, Lord, 52.
Nepal, 227.
Nesselrode, Count, 134.
Newark, 152, 158, 184, 310.
Newcastle, 4th Duke of, 159.
Newcastle, 5th Duke of, 159.
Newfoundland, 254.
Newman, J. H., 147.
New South Wales, 144, 226, 232, 253.
New Zealand, 29, 218, 222, 224, 225, 226,
232, 253, 310.
Ney, Marshal (Prince of Moskowa), 55,
Nice, 61.
Nicholas I., Emperor of Russia, 39, 165,
250.
Nicholas II., Emperor of Russia, 40, 249.
Nietzche, 90.
Nigerians, 226.
Nive, 132.
Nivelle, 132.
492
INDEX
Norfolk, Duke of (Earl Marshal), 241,
295, 296, 297, 308.
Northampton, 173, 176.
Northumberland, 1st Duke of, 191.
Norwich, 173.
Norwich, Bishop (Sheepshanks) of, 289.
Notre Dame de Paris, 50-63, 132, 199.
Nottingham, 173.
Oath, Coronation, 280, 299.
O'Connell, Dan., 162, 163.
O'Connor Don, The, 288.
O'Connor, Feargus, 1 68.
Ohio, 128.
Oldham, 167.
Old Sarum, 184.
Oaslow, Earl of, 260.
Ontario, 167, 226.
Orange, Family of, 36.
Orange party, 17.
Orange, Prince of, II.
Orange, William of (William III.), 19,
164, 170, 175, 190, 260, 280, 322, 323,
329-
Orb, The, 296, 300, 302, 331.
Oriel College, Oxford, 145, 147.
Orleans family, 229.
Orleans, Princess Louise d', 12.
Oscar II., King of Sweden, 229.
Othmans, Family of, 37.
Oudh, 227.
Outram, 228.
Ovid, ii.
Owen, Robert, 26.
Oxford, 87, 130, 152, 161, 256, 257.
Oxford, Bishop (Paget) of, 243, 289.
Oxford movement, 147.
Oxford Union, 152, 161.
Paget, Sir R., 276.
Paine, Thomas, 7.
Paley, Dr, 8, 1 8.
Palmella, Duke of, 134.
Palmer, Hon. R., 314.
Palmerston, Viscount, 125, 136, 146, 263,
270, 282.
" Pamela," 255.
Papacy, 35, 50. .
Paris, 3, 42, 66, 70, 79, 85, 134, 135.
Parliamentary Government in England,
140, 165-170, 171-186, 214-218, 255,
293-
Parratt, Sir W., 302.
Parry, Sir Hubert, 284, 302.
Party Government, 141, 267, 268, 269,
293-
Pathans, 227.
Pau, 54.
Paul, Emperor of Russia, 39.
Paul, Saint, in, 149, 156, 321.
Peelites, 159.
Peel, Sir Robert, 101, 125, 138, 165. 184,
264.
Peel, Viscount, 264.
Peerage (see House of Lords : Territorial
Class).
Peeresses, 241, 258, 269, 270, 271, 314,
3i5-
Pembroke, Catherine, Countess of, 270.
Pembroke, Earl, 293.
Peninsular War, 132, 135.
Penn, W., 112.
Perak, Sultan of, 226.
Perceval, Spencer, 137, 173, 176.
Perkins, Minor Canon, 243.
Perrot, M., 5.
Peter III., Emperor of Russia, 39.
Peter the Great, 57.
Petersfield, 181.
Petty (see Lansdowne).
Philip of Macedon, 139.
Philippa of Hainault, Queen, 207, 313.
Philippe Auguste, 53.
Philips, Mark, 167.
Phillpotts, Bishop, 145.
Piedmont, 37.
Pitt, William, 6, 8, 60, 82, 125, 143, 174,
179, 183, 184, 189.
Pitt, William (Earl of Chatham), 127, 183,
84, 1 89, I94-
Pius VI., 50, 56.
Pius VII., 35, 49, 56, 57, 58.
" Plantagenet Ball," The, 207.
Plantagenets, 259, 300, 308.
Plutarch, 161.
Plymouth, 119.
Pocket-boroughs, 152, 184, 214.
Poets' Corner, 155, 257, 260.
Poland, 65, 68, 129.
Polignac, Prince de, 135.
Pompey, 139.
Ponsonby-Fane, Sir S., 136, 245.
Ponsonby, Sir Henry, 125.
INDEX
493
Pontecorvo, Prince of (see also Bernadotte),
54-
Pontefract, 161.
Pope, A., no.
Portland, 3rd Duke of, 143.
Portland, Duchess of, 315.
Portugal, 22, 131, 132, 134, 251, 252.
Post-Office Reform, 106, 107, 108.
Potsdam, 64.
Poverty, 30, 118, 222.
Pozzo di Borgo, 133.
Pradt, de, 61.
Praed, W. M., 160, 161, 188.
Prebends or Prebendaries of Westminster,
287.
Presburg, 16.
Prince Edward's Island, 21.
Privy Council, 241, 253, 256, 271, 276,
310, 311.
Privy Seal, Lord, 294.
Probyn, Right Hon. Sir D., 298.
Provence, Count of (Louis XVIII.), 47.
Prussia, 64-93, I29> 2O°-
Punjab, 227.
Quai d'Orsay, 135.
Quatre Bras, 14, 194.
Quebec, 28, 99, 128, 167, 223, 224.
Queens-Consort, 311, 312, 313, 314.
Queensland, 226.
Queretaro, 12.
Racine, 75, 253.
Radetsky, 22.
Radicals, 24, 157, 161, 162, 168, 21 1, 255.
Raglan, Lord, 285.
Railway-kings, 2OI, 214.
Railways, 21, 23, 101, 103, 105, 106, 107,
in, 114-119, 148, 173, 174, 178, 206,
213, 214.
Rajputana, 227, 252.
Raleigh, Sir Walter, 10, 327.
Ras Makunen, 249.
Rebellion, The Great, 181, 191, 285, 308,
3°9-
Red Prince, 76, 244.
Reformation, 104, 190, 279.
Reform Bill of 1832, 14, 123, 124, 137, 138,
165, 166, 167, 168, 170, 171, 172, 173,
174, 216, 261.
Reform Bill of 1867, 164, 174, 175.
Regalia, 243, 281, 286, 295, 296, 298, 300,
302, 322, 323.
Regent, George, Prince, 9, 10, 51.
Rehearsal of Coronation Service, 232, 233.
Reid, Hon. Whitelaw, 52, 53, 251.
Reims, 50, 55, 133, 206.
Renaissance, 19, 25, 102-104, 112, 260,
3!3-
Renan, E., 88, 90, 106.
Republicanism in England, 26, 27, 169.
Restoration (French), 47, 55, 134.
Restoration of 1660, 15, 323.
Revolutionary Epic, 25, 152.
Revolution, English (of 1688), 9, 12, 19,
22, 170, 175, 190, 280, 28l.
Revolution, French, 3, 5, 7, 8, 13, 21, 22,
25, 26, 28, 30, 31, 39, 41, 44-63, 65, 66,
70, 75, 88, 98, 102, 104-106, 113, 124,
129, 131, 132, 135, 175, 179, 183, 185,
199, 200, 202, 207, 250, 255.
Revolution of 1848, 21, 22, 26, 36, 62, 176.
Revolution of July, 14, 62.
Reynolds, Sir J., 189.
Rhine, The, 64, 71, 74, 86, 88.
Rhodes, Cecil, Right Hon., 254.
Rhodesia, 99.
Richard I., 291.
Richelieu, Cardinal, 161, 327.
I Richmond, 3rd Duke of, 193.
\ Ridgway, Right Hon. Sir W., 254.
| Ridley, Viscount, 256.
Rifles, King's African, 227.
Rights of Man, 7.
Ripon, Bishop (Boyd-Carpenter) of, 282.
Roberts, Earl, 295.
Robespierre, 47, 106.
Robinson, Canon Armitage, Dean of West-
minster, 244, 279, 289.
Rochester, Bishop (Talbot) of, 282.
Rockingham, Marquess of, 254.
Rocky Mountains, 119, 126.
Rolle, Lord, 127, 129.
Roman Catholics, 17, 23, 212, 297.
Rome, 61, 85, 101, 102, 131.
Rome (ancient), no, in.
Romilly, S., 173.
Romney, G., 189.
Roon, von, General, 69.
Rosebery, Earl of, 125, 165, 293, 294.
Roses, Wars of, 19, 100, 104, 297, 313.
Rothschild, Baron de, 68.
Roumania, Crown Prince and Princess of,
249.
Rowntree, Mr, 118.
494
INDEX
Rubens, 206.
Rugby School, 146, 282, 289, 305.
Russell family, 190.
Russell, Lord John, 125, 137, 172, 264.
Russell, Lord Odo, 78.
Russell, Sir W. H., 76.
Russia, 38-40, 128, 202, 229.
Rutland, Duke of, 310.
Saalfeld, 74.
Sadowa, 40, 69, 70.
St David's, Bishop (Owen) of, 282.
St Helena, 13, 48, 54, 55, 60, 61, 132.
St Lawrence River and Gulf of, 119, 128,
226.
St Michael and St George, Order of, 273,
277.
St Patrick, Order of, 255.
St Petersburg, 38, 85.
St Privat, 73.
St-Simon, 26.
St Stephen, Iron Crown of, 40.
Salford, 167.
Salic Law, 17.
Salisbury, 1st Lord, 265, 294.
Salisbury, Marquis of, 125, 265, 294.
Salmasius, 161.
Sancroft, Archbishop, 150.
Sanders, Nicholas, 312.
Sandon, Viscount, 166.
Sandringham, 288, 289.
Sardinia, 37, 67.
Saul, King, 5.
Savoy, 61.
Savoy, Family of, 37, 229, 250.
Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, Family of, 20, 131,
249.
Saxe-Weimar, Grand Duke of, 77.
Saxony, 71, 73, 76.
Saxony, Crown Prince of, 76.
Schiller, 81, 86, 91.
Schimmelpenninck, 52.
Schleswig-Holstein, 68.
Schleswig-Holstein, Duke of, 77.
Schleswig-Holstein, Princess Christian of
(see Helena, Princess).
Scholefield, J., 169.
Scotch nation, 294, 295, 328, 329.
Se'bastiani, General, 133.
Sedan, 69, 77, 78, 84.
Seddon, Right Hon. R., 232, 253.
Segur, 58.
I Selborne, Earl of, 263.
I Selwyn, Bishop of Lichfield and New Zea-
land, 149, 291.
Sendall, Sir W., 254.
i Seth, 240.
j Seven Years' War, 64.
| Sevigne, Mme. de, 109, no.
Seymour family, 190, 296.
Seymour, Sir E., 297.
Shaftesbury, 7th Earl of, 164, 282.
Shakespeare, 279, 313, 326.
Shaw-Lefevre, Speaker, 151.
Sheba, Queen of, 249.
Sheffield, 168.
Shelburne, Earl of, 136, 254, 260.
I Shelley, 161.
Sheridan, R. B., 139, 173, 189.
; Sherlock, Master of the Temple, 288.
| Shrewsbury, ist Earl of, 308.
Shrewsbury School, 145,
Shrewsbury, 2Oth Earl of, 308.
Sibthorp, Colonel, 162.
Sichel, W., 25.
Sicilian Insurrection, 22.
Sidmouth, ist Viscount, 144.
Sikhs, 227.
Simon, Jules, 106.
Singh, Doulat, 252.
Singh, Sir Pertab, 252.
Slave-trade (see Negro Emancipation).
Smiles, Dr, 256.
Smith, Payne & Smiths, 179.
Socialism, 26, 28, 275.
Sodor and Man, Bishop of, 259.
Solferino, 40.
Somerset, Duke of, 296.
Somerset, Protector, 296.
Smithson, Sir H., 191.
Sophia, Electress, 13, 279 (see also Act of
Settlement, Hanover, House of).
Sorel, Albert, 52.
Soult, Marshal (Duke of Dalmatia), 55,
132, 133-
South Africa, 4, ico, 119, 218, 223, 224, 542.
Southern Cross, 232.
Southey, Robert, 10.
Southwark, 108, 173.
Soveral, Marquis de, 251.
Spain, 37, 52, 53, 132, 321.
Spanish Armada, 170.
Sparta, Duchess of, 248.
Sparta, Duke of, 248.
Spectator, 190, 330.
Spencer, Earl, 292.
Spicheren, 77.
INDEX
495
Spiritual Lords (see Episcopate).
Spithead, 319.
Sprigg, Right Hon. Sir G., 232, 254.
Staal, M. de (Russian ambassador), 250.
Stael, Mme. de, 88.
Stafford, Marquess of, 314.
Staffordshire, 169, 282.
Stage-coaches, 101, 102.
Standard Bearers, 288.
Standish, C, 167.
Stanford, Sir C. Villiers, 316.
Stanhope, Lady Catherine, 165.
Stanley, Arthur, Dean of Westminster, 145.
Stanley, Bishop of Norwich, 145.
Stanley family, 292, 309.
Stanley, Lord (see Fourteenth Earl of
Derby).
Steam-navigation, IOI, III, 119, 173.
Steele, Sir Richard, 330.
Stephenson, G., 106, in.
Stevenson, Andrew, 251.
Stigand, Archbishop, 312.
Stillingfleet, Bishop, 150.
Stoke-on-Trent, 169, 172.
Strafford, ist Earl of, 285.
Straits Settlement, 226.
Strathcona, Lord, 264, 295.
Stuart, Henry (Cardinal York), 131.
Stuart, James (Old Pretender), 127.
Stuarts, the, 10, 124, 131, 162, 175, 190,
260, 279, 280, 288, 295, 327, 328.
Stubbs, Bishop, 149, 290, 311.
Sudanese, 227.
Suez Canal, 158.
Sumner, Archbishop, and Bishop J. B., 143,
145-
Sumner, Bishop C., 145.
Sussex, Augustus, Duke of, 18, 20, 124,
130.
Sutherland, Duchess-Countess of, 65.
Sutherland, Harriet, Duchess of, 192.
Sutherland, Millicent, Duchess of, 315.
Sutherland, ist Duke of, 65, 143.
Sutherland, 2nd Duke of, 65.
Sutherland, Sir Thomas, 277.
Swahelis, 227.
Swan River, 226.
Sweden, 37, 54 ; Crown Prince of, 229.
Swinburne, A. C., 327.
Swiss Guard, the, 3.
Switzerland, 42, 83.
Swords of Regalia, 295, 300.
Sybil, 157.
Sydenham, Lord (Poulett Thompson), 167.
Sydney, N.S.W., 222.
Taine, H., 66, 88, 90, 263.
Tail, Archbishop of Canterbury, 143, 147,
149, 290.
Talbot, Christopher, 161.
Talbot family, 308.
Talleyrand, Prince de, 39, 44, 53, 55, 60,
65»" 133. 134, 160, 250.
Tamils, 227.
Tankerville, Corisande, Countess of, 270.
Tarquins, the, 5.
Tasmania, 226.
Taylor, Sir Henry, 1 59.
Temple, Archbishop of Canterbury (see
Canterbury).
Temple, The, 181.
Tennyson, 161.
Territorial Class, 122, 124, 165, 166, 171,
I75» 177. 178, 180, 181, 182, 186, 190,
191, 192, 214, 215, 216, 217, 254, 273,
274, 276, 309.
Thackeray, W. M., 211.
Thanet, 101.
Theseus, 5.
Thiers, A., 70, 105.
Thirl wall, Bishop Connop, 149.
Thompson, Poulett (Lord Sydenham),
167.
Thomson, Archbishop, 149.
Thomson, James, 330.
Throne of England, 4, 14, 15, 16-19, 23>
24, 129, 156, 189, 203, 204, 208, 235,
241, 302, 315, 331.
Tillotson, Archbishop, 150.
Tilsit, 65.
Tocqueville, A. de, 175, 200.
Tom Brown's Schooldays, 15.
Tories, young, 274.
Toronto, 223.
Toronto Globe, 222.
Torrington, Viscount, 314.
Tory party, 138, 152, 154, 160, 163, 164,
176, 274.
Toulon, 45.
Toulouse, 132.
" Tracts for the Times," 147.
Trade Unionism (see Working Classes).
Tradition, as a factor in English national
life, 43, 126, 131, 149, 181, 184, 187,
189, 193, 201, 204-209, 215, 238, 255.
260, 264, 266, 274, 284, 285, 286, 290,
291, 292, 296, 297, 305, 306, 310, 312,
322, 323, 327.
Trafalgar, 52.
496
INDEX
Tremouille, Charlotte de, Countess of
Derby, 271.
Trentham, 192.
Treves, Sir F., 277.
Trojan War, 5, 25.
Tsars, Coronation of, 38, 39.
Tudors, 265, 280, 306, 313, 323, 324, 325,
326.
Tuileries, the, 3, 5, 50, 75.
Tunisia, 99.
Turenne, 74.
Turin, 61, 250.
Tweed, 294.
U
Under-Secretaries of State, 156, 273.
Union League Club, 251.
Union of England with Scotland, 328, 329.
Union of Great Britain with Ireland, 179,
261.
" United Empire Loyalists," 225.
United States of America, 27, 28, 42, 52,
91* 97> 98» I2O, 123, 129, 2OI, 222, 251,
255. 283.
University College, London, 140.
Utilitarian democracy, 27, 204, 21 1, 213,
276.
Valensay, 55.
Valence, 50.
Valerien, Mont, 79.
Valmy, 54, 86, 200.
Valois, The, 104.
Vancouver, 102.
Vandal, Albert, 45.
Vandyke, 206.
Vatican Council, 78.
Vauban, 74-
Vaughan, Very Rev. Dr, 288.
Velasquez, 206.
Verona, Congress of, 135.
Versailles, 41, 44, 69-81, 84, 87, 91, 92,
192.
Victor Emmanuel II. , King of Italy, 36.
Victoria (Australia), 226.
Victoria, Princess (dau. of King Edward
VII.), 244.
Vienna, 85.
Vienna, Congress of, 37, 60, 61, 66, 71,
H3» 134, 135-
Vignaud, H., 52.
Villafranca, Peace of, 67.
Villiers, Right Hon. C. P., 160, 169.
Virgil, n.
Vivian, Sir Hussey (ist Lord Vivian), 135.
Voltaire, 74, 86, 151, 183.
, the, 92.
W
Waddington, W. H., 269.
Wagner, R., 88.
Wagram, 134.
Wakefield, 168.
Wales, 282, 325.
Wales, Frederick, Prince of, 13.
Wales, George, Prince of (see Regent,
Prince).
Wales, Henry, Prince of, 10.
Wales, Prince Albert of, 244.
Wales, Prince Edward of, 244.
Wales, Prince of, 245, 246, 247, 252, 284,
306.
Wales, Princess Charlotte of, 10-12.
Wales, Princess of, 245, 246, 298.
Walpole, Horace, no.
Walsingham, Sir F., 327.
Wardle, Colonel, 8.
Warham, Archbishop, 143.
Washington, George, 251.
Waterloo, 55, 66, 91, 133, 136, 285.
Watt, James, in, 122.
Watts, Isaac, 244.
Wedderburn, Scrymgeour, 288.
Weimar, 65, 86.
Weldon, W. H. (Norroy King-at-Arms),
3!5-
Welldon, Right Rev. Bishop, 243, 289.
Wellesley, Dean, 125.
Wellesley, Marchioness, 270.
Wellington, ist Duke of, 24, 39, 124, 126,
132, 133, 135. 136, 138, 285.
Wellington, 4th Duke of, 288.
Westcott, Bishop, 149, 291.
Western Australia, 137, 226.
Westminster, city of, 108, 136, 173, 192.
Westminster, Dean and Chapter of, 243,
287, 288.
Westminster School, 243, 284, 285.
Westmoreland, gth Earl of, 126, 128.
Westphalia, Jerome, King of, 13.
West Indies, 113, 163, 166, 182, 227, 254.
Whately, Archbishop, 147.
Wheatstone, in.
INDEX
497
Whigs, The, 135, 138, 139, 154, 160, 163,
164, 211, 260.
Whitehall, 283, 285.
Whitgift, Archbishop, 219.
Whitworth, Lord, 51, 52.
Wickham Legg, Dr J., 219, 285, 312, 323,
327.
Wickham Legg, L. G., 219.
Wieland, 86.
Wigan, 167.
Wilberforce, Basil, Archdeacon of West-
minster, 244, 289.
Wilberforce, Ernest, Bishop of Chichester,
289.
Wilberforce, Samuel, Bishop of Oxford,
146, 149.
Wilberforce, William, 9.
Wilhelm Strasse, 135.
Wilkes, John, 149, 185.
William I., (German Emperor), 41, 58, 64-
79, 80, 99, 248, 249.
William II. (German Emperor), 92, 93, 248.
William III., 19, 164, 170, 175, 190, 260,
280, 322, 323, 329.
William IV., 14, 15, 17, 102, 139.
William the Conqueror, 312, 313.
Winchester, Bishop (Davidson) of, 125,
290, 300, 301, 303, 304.
Winchester, 5th Marquess of, 308.
Winchester, I5th Marquess of, 308.
Winchester, i6th Marquess of, 308.
Windham, 136, 139, 173.
Windischgraetz, 22.
Windsor Castle, 11, 231, 288, 289.
Wolfe, General, 128.
Wolseley, Viscount, 296.
Wolverhampton, 161, 169.
Wood, Charles (Lord Halifax), 168.
Worcester, Bishop (Gore) of, 256, 282.
Working-classes, 27, 28, 116, 118, 123,
178, 204, 211, 2l6, 217, 222, 275 .
Worksop, Lord of the Manor of, 278.
Wren, Sir Christopher, 4.
Wurtemburg, 71, 86.
Wurtemburg, King of, 13.
Wyndham Lewis, Mrs, 154, 157, 174 (see
also Disraeli, Mrs).
Wyndham, Right Hon. G., 255.
York, 144.
York, Archbishop (Maclagan) of, 291, 300,
311, 312, 314.
York, Archbishopric of, 143, 311, 312.
York, Frederick, Duke of, 8.
Yorkshire, 1 1 6, 167.
Zadok the Priest, 156, 299.
Zoological Gardens, 228.
Zulu War, 254.
Zurich, 46.
PRINTED BY
TURNBULL AND SPEARS,
EDINBURGH
University of California
SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY
Return this material to the library
from which it was borrowed.
Rift C$4990
1LL-Gtt4u
_
O~
FEB 0 6 199T
i
JUN 1 9 2001
SRLF
2 WEEK LOAN
UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL
A 000 020 941