(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Creativity in the California wine industry : oral history transcript / and related material, 1984-1985"

University of California Berkeley 



Regional Oral History Office University of California 

The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California 



The Wine Spectator California Winemen Oral History Series 



Robert Mondavi 
CREATIVITY IN THE CALIFORNIA WINE INDUSTRY 



With an Introduction by 
Maynard A. Amerine 



An Interview Conducted by 

Ruth Teiser 

in 1984 



Copyright (c) 1985 by The Regents of the University of California 



All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal 
agreement between the University of California and 
Robert Mondavi dated May 21, 1985. The manuscript 
is thereby made available for research purposes . All 
literary rights in the manuscript, including the right 
to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the 
University of California, Berkeley. No part of the 
manuscript may be quoted for publication without the 
written permission of the Director of The Bancroft 
Library of the University of California at Berkeley. 

Requests for permission to quote for publication 
should be addressed to the Regional Oral History Office, 
486 Library, and should include identification of the 
specific passages to be quoted, anticipated use of the 
passages, and identification of the user. The legal 
agreement with Robert Mondavi requires that he be 
notified of the request and allowed thirty days in 
which to respond. 

It is recommended that this oral history be cited 
as follows : 

Robert Mondavi, "Creativity in the California 
Wine Industry," an oral history conducted 
1984 by Ruth Teiser, Regional Oral History 
Office, The Bancroft Library, University of 
California, Berkeley, 1985. 



Copy No. 



ttj^^^jjiii^^^^N^iBB^ 




MARGRIT BIEVER AND ROBERT MONDAVI 
1983 



TABLE OF CONTENTS Robert Mondavi 



PREFACE i 

INTRODUCTION by Maynard A. Amerine iv 

INTERVIEW HISTORY v 

BRIEF BIOGRAPHY vi 

I CESARE MONDAVI 1 

II ROBERT MONDAVI: EARLY YEARS 7 

College and Career Beginnings, 1932-1936 7 

Working with Jack Riorda, 1937-1943 9 

III CHARLES KRUG WINERY 12 

Purchase by Cesare Mondavi, 1943 12 

Renovating and Getting Started 16 

Making Wine in the 1940s and 1950s 20 

Broader Horizons 23 

Selling and Publicizing Wines 26 

Building Volume 29 

Industry Organizations and Activities 30 

Changes 36 

IV THE ROBERT MONDAVI WINERY 39 

Establishing a New Enterprise 39 

Observations upon European Winemaking 42 

Attracting Capital 44 

Achieving Family Ownership 46 

Promoting and Improving the Wines 50 

Distribution, Sales, and Employees 54 

Buying the Oakville Label and Inventory 58 

Adding the Winery in Woodbridge 59 

Architecture of the Robert Mondavi Winery 63 

Export Markets and Domestic Markets 67 

The Napa Valley Vintners and Its Early Members 68 

Paying Growers by the Bottle Price Formula 72 

The Bottle Price Formula and Wine Quality 74 

Mike, Marcie, and Tim Mondavi 78 

The Creation of Opus One 82 

Wine and Food 90 

The Napa Valley Wine Symposium and Auction 92 

The Winery Tour with Margrit Biever 96 

TAPE GUIDE 103 

INDEX 104 



PREFACE 



The California wine industry oral history series, a project of the 
Regional Oral History Office, was initiated in 1969 through the action and 
with the financing of the Wine Advisory Board, a state marketing order 
organization which ceased operation in 1975. In 1983 it was reinstituted as 
The Wine Spectator California Winemen Oral History Series with donations from 
The Wine Spectator Scholarship Foundation. The selection of those to be 
interviewed is made by a committee consisting of James D. Hart, director of 
The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley; John A. De Luca, 
president of the Wine Institute, the statewide winery organization; Maynard 
A. Amerine, Emeritus Professor of Viticulture and Enology, University of 
California, Davis; Jack L. Davies, the 1985 chairman of the board of directors 
of the Wine Institute; Ruth Teiser, series project director; and Marvin R. 
Shanken, trustee of The Wine Spectator Scholarship Foundation. 

The purpose of the series is to record and preserve information on 
California grape growing and wine making that has existed only in the memories 
of wine men. In some cases their recollections go back to the early years of 
this century, before Prohibition. These recollections are of particular value 
because the Prohibition period saw the disruption of not only the industry 
itself but also the orderly recording and preservation of records of its 
activities. Little has been written about the industry from late in the last 
century until Repeal. There is a real paucity of information on the 
Prohibition years (1920-1933) , although some commercial wine making did 
continue under supervision of the Prohibition Department. The material in 
this series on that period, as well as the discussion of the remarkable 
development of the wine industry in subsequent years (as yet treated 
analytically in few writings) will be of aid to historians. Of particular 
value is the fact that frequently several individuals have discussed the same 
subjects and events or expressed opinions on the same ideas, each from his 
own point of view. 

Research underlying the interviews has been conducted principally in 
the University libraries at Berkeley and Davis, the California State Library, 
and in the library of the Wine Institute, which has made its collection of in 
many cases unique materials readily available for the purpose. 

Three master indices for the entire series are being prepared, one of 
general subjects, one of wines, one of grapes by variety. These will be 
available to researchers at the conclusion of the series in the Regional Oral 
History Office and at the library of the Wine Institute. 



ii 



The Regional Oral History Office was established to tape record 
autobiographical interviews with persons who have contributed significantly 
to recent California history. The office is headed by Willa K. Baum and is 
under the administrative supervision of James D. Hart, the director of 
The Bancroft Library. 



Ruth Teiser 
Project Director 
The Wine Spectator California 
Winemen Oral History Series 



10 September 1984 
Regional Oral History Office 
486 The Bancroft Library 
University of California, Berkeley 



iii 

CALIFORNIA WINE INDUSTRY INTERVIEWS 
Interviews Completed by 1985 

Leon D. Adams, REVITALIZING THE CALIFORNIA WINE INDUSTRY 1974 

Maynard A. Amerine, THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AND THE STATE'S WINE 
INDUSTRY 1971 

Philo Biane, WINE MAKING IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AND RECOLLECTIONS OF FRUIT 
INDUSTRIES, INC. 1972 

Burke H. Critchfield, Carl F. Wente, and Andrew G. Frericks, THE 

CALIFORNIA WINE INDUSTRY DURING THE DEPRESSION 1972 

William V. Cruess, A HALF CENTURY OF FOOD AND WINE TECHNOLOGY 1967 

William A. Dieppe, ALMADE'N IS MY LIFE 1985 

Alfred Fromm, MARKETING CALIFORNIA WINE AND BRANDY 1984 

Maynard A. Joslyn, A TECHNOLOGIST VIEWS THE CALIFORNIA WINE INDUSTRY 1974 

Horace 0. Lanza and Harry Baccigaluppi, CALIFORNIA GRAPE PRODUCTS AND OTHER 
WINE ENTERPRISES 1971 

Louis M. Martini and Louis P. Martini, WINEMAKERS OF THE NAPA VALLEY 1973 

Louis P. Martini, A FAMILY WINERY AND THE CALIFORNIA WINE INDUSTRY 1984 

Otto E. Meyer, CALIFORNIA PREMIUM WINES AND BRANDY 1973 

Robert Mondavi, CREATIVITY IN THE WINE INDUSTRY 1985 

Harold P. Olmo, PLANT GENETICS AND NEW GRAPE VARIETIES 1976 

Antonio Perelli-Minetti, A LIFE IN WINE MAKING 1975 

Louis A. Petri, THE PETRI FAMILY IN THE WINE INDUSTRY 1971 

Jefferson E. Peyser, THE LAW AND THE CALIFORNIA WINE INDUSTRY 1974 

Lucius Powers, THE FRESNO AREA AND THE CALIFORNIA WINE INDUSTRY 1974 

Victor Repetto and Sydney J. Block, PERSPECTIVES ON CALIFORNIA WINES 1976 

Edmund A. Rossi, ITALIAN SWISS COLONY AND THE WINE INDUSTRY 1971 

A. Setrakian, A LEADER OF THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY GRAPE INDUSTRY 1977 

Andre Tchelistchef f , GRAPES, WINE, AND ECOLOGY 1983 

Brother Timothy, THE CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AS WINEMAKERS 197 1 * 

Ernest A. Wente, WINE MAKING IN THE LIVERMORE VALLEY 1971 

Albert J. Winkler, VITICULTURAL RESEARCH AT UC DAVIS (1921-1971) 1973 



iv 



INTRODUCTION 



In this interview Robert Mondavi tells us many things about himself, his 
career, and his ideas on wine. 

First of all, it is a very open discussion, very much like Robert Mondavi 
is in a conversation. He tells us several times that he has no secrets, not 
even in the marketplace. Honesty is the best policy, he says a very pragmatic 
American point of view. What he has is a super-abundance of ideas about how 
to make and sell better wines. He says this directly, often even bluntly. At 
times it seems as if he were trying to convince us of the wisdom of his views. 

Second, he has a very inquisitive mind. His "show me" point of view has 
led him to question every aspect of the production and sale of products of the 
California grape and wine industry. And in several cases this questioning has 
led to innovative practices. 

Third, he believes in having everything about his vineyards, wines, 
wineries, and promotion "distinctive." By distinctive he means quality-wise. 
Obviously, one's concept of quality is a personal matter, but the interview 
shows that he is sensitive to other people's ideas about the distinctiveness 
of the quality of his wines. No doubt, with his own changing concept, 'his 
goals of what he wishes to produce have changed. In a way, most of the 
interview is about quality: quality of product, quality of architecture, 
quality of public relations, quality of care of growers and employees, and the 
quality and care of his family. He is enormously proud of the accomplishments 
of his three children and of his wife. 

Finally, Robert Mondavi reveals himself as a person who takes a long- 
range view of the California wine industry and his place in it. His support 
of and use of research is proof of this. He believes in building slowly with 
an eye to his eventual goals. To this effort he brings enormous energy and a 
lively imagination. No wonder he has come so far. And there is no doubt he 
intends to go farther much farther. 

Maynard A. Amerine 



3 September 1985 

St. Helena, California 



Regional Oral History Office 



The Bancroft Library 
University of California 
Berkeley, California 91*720 



I, 



Margrit Biever 



_, do hereby give to The Bancroft 



name 



Library for such scholarly and educational uses as the Director of The Bancroft 
Library shall determine the following tape-recorded interview(s) recorded with 



me oo 



April 17, 1984-October 15, 1984 



for The Bancroft Library as 



dateTa) 
an unrestricted gift and transfer to the University of California legal title 

and all literary property rights including copyright. This gift does not preclude 
any use which I may want to make of the information in the recordings myself. 

This agreement may be revised or amended by mutual consent of the parties 
undersigned. 




Signature 

Margrit Biever 



P.O. Box 106 



Oakville, California 94562 
Name & address of interviewee 



Date 



LuJL 




Department Head 

Regional Oral History Office 

The Bancroft Library 




It . 



Date 



Subject Of Interview(s) Robert Mondavi, "Creativity in the California Wine Industry" 
Approved as to Form, 2k August 1976 



INTERVIEW HISTORY 



The interview with Robert Mondavi was held in four sessions, on April 17, 
19 and 20, and October 15, 1984. All took place in his light, attractive 
office at the Robert Mondavi Winery in Oakville except that of April 20, a 
holiday when the winery was closed and the session took place at Mr. Mondavi's 
nearby hilltop guest house overlooking vineyards near the Silverado Trail. 
At the final session, Margrit Biever, who was married to Mr. Mondavi in 1981, 
added her description of the Robert Mondavi Winery tour; it is an important 
and carefully developed part of the winery's public relations program. 

Mr. Mondavi spoke with enthusiasm and candor about many aspects of his 
life and career, some of which he has previously discussed in journalistic 
interviews. Here, however, they are brought together in a detailed 
chronological account. Because during the interview ideas suggested other 
ideas that were not necessarily in chronological order, some editing was 
required. The transcript of the taped interview was read over by Harvey 
Posert, the winery's public relations director, and by Margrit Biever and 
Robert Mondavi, each of whom made small changes but no substantive alterations. 

Additional discussions of wine making in the Napa Valley are to be found 
in interviews in this series with Louis M. Martini, Louis P. Martini, Andre" 
Tchelistcheff , and Brother Timothy. 



Ruth Teiser 
Interviewer-Editor 



10 September 1985 

Regional Oral History Office 

486 The Bancroft Library 

University of California at Berkeley 



Regional Oral HjLstory Office University of California 

Room 486 The 'Bancroft Library Berkeley, California 94720 

vi 

BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION 
(Please print or write clearly) 

Your full name Robert Gerald Mondavi 

Date of birth June 18, 1913 Place of birth Virginia. Minnesota 

Father's full name Cesare Mondavi 

Birthplace Marche, Italy 

Occupation Agriculturalist 

Mother's full name Rosa Mondavi 

Birthplace Marche, Italy __ 

Occupation Housewife 

Where did you grow up ? Ixxii, California 



Present community Napa Valley, California 



Education Graduated from Lodi Union High School. Studied economics at 
Stanford University, graduated in 1936. 



Occupation (s) Winanaker 



Special interests or activities Tennis, food, wine, travel and art 



I CESARE MONDAVI 

[Interview 1: April 17, 1984]## 



Teiser: I would like to start by asking you about your father, Cesare 
Mondavi. When and where was he born? 

Mondavi: In Provincia di Ancona, in Sassof errato, a little town northeast 
of Rome, some hundred miles away on the coast of the Adriatic. 
Very mountainous country. Then he came to this country in 1906. 
He had friends of his that were working in the iron ore mines in 
Minnesota and they wrote to him. He decided he wanted to do 
something other than what was going on in Italy. So he came to 
this country and landed in Virginia, Minnesota. He worked in the 
iron ore mines there for several years. 

He then went back after a couple of years and married my 
mother, brought her back 

Teiser: From Italy? 

Mondavi: from Italy. He had been in Minnesota during those years working 
in the iron ore mines, but he didn't like that. He then bought a 
store, a grocery store in partnership with the Brunettis and was 
in that for a period of time, and then had a bar and a saloon 
thereafter. My mother worked with him. 

[Interruption] 

My mother was a very active woman. We had a large home there 
where my mother had boarders. She would have from fifteen up to 
eighteen boarders. She would feed them. A few of them would be 
even staying in the house. And yet she was raising four children 
at the same time. 

My dad also later on had the saloon. When Prohibition came 
along in 1918, many people asked him to maintain the saloon and 



make some good money. My dad would not abide by that. He wanted 
to go by the law. So he closed down the saloon. At that time he 
was the secretary of the Italian Club, and when Prohibition came 
along the Italians wanted to make their wine, so my father was 
selected to go to California to buy grapes. 

So he took his first trip. He covered California. He went 
from the northern part of California to the southern part of 
California. He began to buy grapes there I guess in 1918. 

Then he decided in 1923 to move the family to California. He 
liked California. As I say, he looked at the northern part of 
California and the southern part of California, and he decided to 
settle in Lodi because it was centrally located where he could buy 
grapes up in Napa and Sonoma, and he could also go to Fresno, 
where he could buy Muscat grapes. He located himself in Lodi, 
where he would buy Zinfandel. It worked out very efficiently. So 
our family moved to Lodi in 1923. I was ten years old at that 
time. I was born in 1913. 

Teiser: You were by then aware of what was going on. 

Mondavi: I was aware at that time what was going on. In fact what 

happened we used to nail boxes for my father. My dad would ship 
grapes in what I call Sanger lugs, these little wooden boxes. My 
brother [Peter] and I made boxes during the summer. Every summer 
we would work the entire summer. We would take off a week or ten 
days, but then after that we would work all summer long nailing 
these boxes. We would make up to a hundred thousand of these 
boxes. 

Teiser: Did you ship to not only his own associates in Minnesota but also 
other places? 

Mondavi: Oh, he shipped all over, in fact. He shipped to New York, 
Connecticut. He went to Boston, Massachusetts, and all 
throughout the Midwest, Pennsylvania. He shipped in Minnesota. 
Everywhere around. 

Teiser: Did he sell through auctions? 

Mondavi: No, he sold to friends of his that he'd met, and that he knew 

wanted to buy grapes. He would ship to them. Oh, sometimes he 
would go to the auctions, but not that often. It was more or less 
a personalized business. Friends of his, like the Barengos, would 
ship to auction. But my father felt that he preferred to do 
business with people that he knew, that would make homemade wine, 
or people that were brokers, or would buy these grapes and then 
sell them to friends. It was more of a personal relationship. 

It was rather interesting. I remember the first trip that I 
took with my father. When I graduated from college, I took a trip 



with my father just to call on some of his accounts. I was 
dumbfounded. It was a friendly relationship. When he would go 
there, he would play cards. He would do everything but talk 
business. Just prior to leaving, before he would get on the 
train, or bus, or whatever it was, they would complete the 
business relationship in a few words. I couldn't get over that. 

When I went to school at Stanford, I was studying how to do 
this or do that. I thought they would get down and really discuss 
these things. Not at all. They would play cards. And they would 
have a good time. Every time, just prior to leaving they would 
say a few words, and that was the relationship. So it was a very 
personal relationship, the integrity of the two people. And they 
would talk a few words: "The grapes could have been better," or 
"The grapes were very good," and they understood each other. It 
was amazing. 

Teiser: They didn't talk prices? 

Mondavi: No, the prices were created as they went along because it depended 
upon what went on during the harvest. In other words, they 
understood that they would do business with each other, and that 
they would try to be reasonable. There seemed to be a lot of good 
faith between each other. The price would be dependent on whether 
you had big crops or small crops. 

My father used to buy many of his grapes not by the ton. 
Many times he would buy the block, the entire vineyard, and 
estimate the crop, and pay for it that way. I can always remember 
my father going out to look at the weather conditions to see if it 
was cloudy, to see whether it's going to rain, because a lot of his 
business, when he bought by the patch, would be dependent upon how 
much he could get out of that. If it would rain, he would be the 
loser. But at the same time, if he guessed well, he would do 
well. 

Teiser: How big was a "patch?" 

Mondavi: They could have a vineyard that might be ten acres or twenty acres. 

Teiser: That large? 

Mondavi: Oh, yes. Sometimes he used to buy as many as fifty, sixty acres, a 
hundred acres at a time. That would be a large patch. That would 
be one of the big ones. Usually they would be smaller patches. 
They might be maybe fifty tons, a hundred tons. That would be 
more or less the size. But he did do business occasionally with 
certain large growers that would have two hundred to five hundred 
tons. 

He did his business that way. He did some of it by the ton. 



He preferred buying by the ton because the responsibility was on 
the part of the grower. But at the same time, some of the 
growers, who had some of the better grapes, didn't want to gamble. 
They wanted my father to gamble. I do remember that. 

My dad would worry about that, and I made up my mind that if 
I ever went into business and I wanted to go into the business 
world I didn't want to be subject to weather conditions alone. I 
wanted to have other things other than just weather conditions. 
Because that was quite a gamble. If it should rain all of a 
sudden, you could have a difficult time. That was one of the 
things that concerned me when I was younger. 

Then I also wanted to build something. Well, you could build 
a reputation on something that you could make. That's why when we 
went into the wine business I made up my mind that we had to 
create an image for ourselves, that that in itself would be very 
helpful in trying to stabilize prices for us. 

Teiser: Do you remember what varieties your father bought? A lot of 
Alicante Bouschet? 

Mondavi: My dad concentrated mainly on Zinfandel, Muscat, Carignane, and 
Alicante. Maybe five to ten percent Alicante, depending. 
Generally speaking, I would say that his grapes would be eighty- 
five percent to ninety percent Zinfandel. And then he would have 
Muscat, Carignane, and Alicante mainly. 

Teiser: Did They ship well? 

Mondavi: Yes, they shipped very well. Most of the grapes that he bought 
were around the Lodi region. Sometimes he came up here to Napa 
and Sonoma. For those that would pay a little more money for 
them, he would come here [to the Napa Valley]. The Muscats would 
be purchased in the Fresno region. He did not ship Thompson 
Seedless, because his customers didn't make wine out of those. 
But they did use Muscat, some Alicante and some Carignane for 
wine. 

Teiser: That's interesting. He must have been a good businessman. 

Mondavi: He was a very good businessman, and he had a wonderful reputation. 
He was a man of few words. He didn't talk much. He would look at 
you and you would know exactly what he was thinking; you would 
know exactly what we wanted without any word; a shrug of the 
shoulder, a smile, a nod was sufficient. He didn't have to say 
anything. 

Really, it was rather interesting. I know when I would talk 
with him, my father would listen. If he said "okay," you knew 
that you were right on the beam. And it's rather interesting. 



Teiser: 



Mondavi: 



Teiser: 
Mondavi: 



You have to understand my father. He was not complimentary, but 
you know that once he allowed you to do something, you got his 
approval. And that I realized. It wasn't necessary that he would 
compliment you. My father rarely complimented me or my mother or 
any of his children. When he gave his approval, that was 
complimentary in his mind, and you had to accept it as such. 



Were you then allowed to carry work out in your own way? 
didn't supervise carefully? 



He 



No, he did not supervise carefully. What my dad did was really 
have faith in you. I know when I came here [to the Napa Valley] 
and was working, I was representing him. I used to tell him 
everything, and he knew I told everything, at least as best I 
could. My father then allowed me to do almost anything, even 
though I made mistakes. I knew that. 

My dad was a very considerate person, a very kind person, 
even though a man of few words. Basically, if you did things 
well, I knew good and well, he would see you through. And I don't 
care how tough the situation would be, as long as you were 
completely open and honest, he would be with you. 

Then again, if he didn't approve, he would not argue. All he 
would just do is say "It's a waste," and work with someone else. 
He didn't like to argue. I can remember one of the great big 
deals that he had he had partners at one time, and they were 
manipulating a little bit. These were very close friends. Well, 
my dad didn't want to argue. He didn't say anything much, except 
that he agreed that he would pull out. Let them take this very 
important vineyard. That was a very fine vineyard. In the 
meantime he replaced it with other vineyards over a period of time 
that he felt were just as good or possibly better. This took 
several years. 

He did not like to have any strife. He did not like to have 
arguments or discussions. He would rather go about his own 
business, create his own thing, which he did all his life. As I 
say, he was a man of few words. 

Did he become a grower there in Lodi? 

No, this is one thing that I was amazed at. My father never wanted 
to buy land or do anything like that. He wanted to buy grapes, 
but he never became a grower. Somehow or other I differed with my 
father in that regard. He did change later on, because we bought 
land here, when we went into the wine business here. But that's 
one thing I never quite understood in my father, why he didn't 
want to have some land. I think he felt that he could be better 
off just buying grapes and negotiating that way. 



Teiser : 



Mondavi; 



Teiser: 



Mondavi: 



Teiser: 

Mondavi: 
Teiser: 

Mondav i : 



I looked at the federal records of the Acampo Winery and 
Distillery, of which he was a part. That was at least originated 
by a group of growers, in 1934. 

Yes, and my father was really one of the principal people there. 
He later became the president of the company. The growers had 
faith in my father. My father built up quite a reputation. I can 
remember the time I heard many people say, "Oh, Mondavi, he's good 
as gold." He just built a reputation for being, I guess, a quiet 
soft-spoken man. He wouldn't create problems, and always paid his 
bills, and people had great respect for him. 

He put three thousand dollars into the organizaion originally. 
That was the lowest amount of anyone. (All this is in the federal 
records.) Later he increased his interest in it. 

They wanted to hurry and get a distillery bond, because the 
growers had lost money the year before, and they needed the 
distillery so they could make sweet wines in '34. They described 
themselves as a group of growers. That's why I asked you if your 
father was 

He was not a grower. In fact, they went to my father and they made 
him the president of the company there maybe because of my father 
being a very conservative man. He seemed to win the confidence of 
growers. He was not a grower. Everyone else may have been 
growers, like J.B. Gundert of the Farmers Merchant Bank who was a 
principal man in Acampo Winery. And I guess he knew my father and 
had faith in my father and wanted my father to work with them 
there. And that's how he started in the Acampo Winery. 

Your father was on the board at first. Then he was vice-president 
in '39. 

Then he became a president. 
In '40. 

You were around that winery? 

No, I was nailing boxes. Before I went to college, I was nailing 
boxes for my father. My dad used to ship about a hundred, to one 
hundred and twenty five cars of grapes a year. I nailed boxes 
every year up to 1932 when I graduated from high school. 




CESARE MONDAVI 



ROSA MONDAVI 



1952 



II ROBERT MONDAVI: EARLY YEARS 



College and Career Beginnings. 1932-1936 



Mondavi: I then went to college in '32. I graduated with the class of '36. 

I remember one thing that happened that was rather interest 
ing. My father taught me to drive a car when I was thirteen years 
old. We were nailing boxes out at the Pope Vineyard. He was 
turning his car in, wanted to buy another Studebaker, but he let 
me have the old touring car because I had to drive out to work. I 
drove my brother and my two sisters. They used to work with us. 
They cleated boxes for us one year. We nailed boxes until I went 
to college, every summer. 

Mondavi: My brother and I were getting a dollar and a quarter a hundred. 

We gave twenty-five cents of that to our cleaters. And this money 
was accumulating in the bank over these years. We had about ten, 
twelve thousand dollars, but the idea was that this money was to 
put us through school. 

When the Depression came along, my father came to me. We were 
nailing boxes at that time. He said, "You know, Bob, jobs are 
very difficult to come by. I was just wondering. The bank came 
to me. And they said they have a teller's job. And really, it's 
a good position. And people can't find positions like this. 
Maybe you would like to go work at the bank, at the Farmers and 
Merchants Bank." 

I remember him coming out to me at Pope Vineyards. And I 
said, "Well, Dad, my ambition was always to go to college. I 
would just as well stay out and work if that's necessary, but go 
to school." He then said that things were a little difficult, 
would we mind lending him the money that we made so that we could 
help him through this difficult time. My brother and I said, 



"Well, certainly, as long as we can go through school." So we 
gave him the money at that time, which he took with the agreement 
of putting us through college. 

I stayed out one semester and nailed celery crates. And then 
the conditions turned a little bit better. My brother and I 
wanted to go to Stanford. He had no qualms, he didn't argue, no 
discussion about it. He sent us to Stanford, and that was it. 
The only thing was that we had to stay out a quarter in order to 
make some money to help him through that tough time. 

My father was a man of few words. He didn't argue, no 
discussion. He would just go about his way. And that's why he 
was loved by all the people around him. And that's why he had 
such a reputation, because he didn't discuss or argue or try to 
tell what to do or what not to do. At least he didn't with us. 

My father came to me in 1935 when I was a junior at Stanford. 
My brother was one grade behind me. He was a sophomore. At that 
time my father said that he wanted to know what I was interested 
in doing. And he asked my brother too. I said I was interested 
in the business world. I wanted to go in the school of business. 
And then he said, well if that's the case, he felt that there was 
a future in the table wine business. And that he felt that Napa 
Valley, in his estimation, was the outstanding wine-growing region 
for table wine, for both red and white table wines. And he felt 
that, frankly, we could develop something in it and would have a 
future. 

We children, especially Italian families, the sun would rise 
and set in their parents, because they looked up to them and they 
could make no mistake. But also I agreed with my father. I 
thought why not a start in a young industry? And my brother also 
felt the same thing. So what I did, I took chemistry in my senior 
year at Stanford, which I could use in the wine business. 

Then my father made a deal with Jack Riorda when he realized 
that we were interested in the wine business. At that time, Jack 
Riorda had a small winery, about an eighty-thousand gallon winery 
called the Sunny Hill Winery.* He was not able to sell the wine. 
And my father had these contacts that he had done business with in 
the grape business during Prohibition. These people had gone into 
the wine business. So my father had contacts there, and he sold 
this wine for Jack Riorda. 



*Later Sunny St. Helena. 



So Jack Riorda wanted to have a partner who he had faith in 
and had the ability of selling the wine that he made. My father 
realized that both Peter and I were interested in the business 
world. He made a deal with Jack Riorda where they enlarged the 
winery from eighty-thousand gallons to a half a million gallons. 
Upon graduating, I then was taught for about three months some of 
the basic principles of wine enology by Vic Enriques, who was 
teaching enology at the University of California at Berkeley. At 
that time it was at Berkeley. 

Teiser: There was a Hilary J. Enriques who was a research chemist at D.C. 

Mondavi: That's the one. When I graduated from school I went back home. 

And then during the summer months I was tutored by him because he 
was away from school during that summer vacation. During that 
three months he taught me all the analysis that we use in wines. 
He trained me at that and then gave me the books to study, which I 
took with me when I went to St. Helena and worked with Jack 
Riorda. 

Teiser: What happened to Enriques? 

Mondavi: He passed away. I don't know how many years later he passed away. 
He was going with my wife's aunt. When I told him of my interest, 
he said, "I'd be happy to work with you." And that's how we got 
together. So it was just by chance. 

Teiser: Did you ever work with Archie Cellini Arthur Cellini at Acampo? 

Mondavi: Archie Cellini was there for years as the winemaker, but I never 
worked with Archie Cellini. I knew him, naturally, through my 
father. Upon graduating, I went to Napa Valley. My brother 
Peter, when he graduated from school a year later, went to the 
Bradford winery and worked there for a while. And then he went to 
work at Acampo for Dino Barengo. Dino Barengo then became the 
winemaker at Acampo. I think that's when Archie Cellini left. 
And then my brother Peter worked there for Dino Barengo as a 
chemist. 



Working with Jack Riorda. 1937-1943 



After graduating from college, I went to St. Helena, and I 
worked with Jack Riorda. And I represented my father, who lived 
in Lodi. I moved here. I began working in March of 1937 under 
Jack Riorda as his assistant in making bulk table wine. We 



10 



shipped wine in tank cars at that time. We made both red and 
white wine in bulk. We did no bottling. We shipped in tank cars, 
six and eight thousand gallon tank cars. 

And then my father took me on one of his trips to the East. 
When I was married in '40, I covered all the accounts that my dad 
was doing business with on my honeymoon. I met all the people. 
So, you see, I was working but having a good time at the same 
time. This was for the Sunny St. Helena Winery. We were selling 
bulk wines to people in New Orleans, in New York, in Boston, 
Chicago, Minnesota, and places like that. 

Teiser: It started as Sunny Hill Winery and became Sunny St. Helena? 

Mondavi: The name was changed from Sunny Hill Winery because they had a 

business connection with a man, Joe Gazzara in Chicago, and he had 
the Sunny Hill name in Chicago. So it was changed to Sunny St. 
Helena Wine Company. 

Tesier: What was Jack Riorda like? 

Mondavi: Jack Riorda was a very knowledgeable wine man, a very good man, had 
good friendly relations with all the growers around here. They 
believed in him very strongly. In fact, he taught me a lot. And 
yet he didn't have that scientific training, if you know what I 
mean. But he was a good winemaker. And he made good wines. 

Teiser: You spoke just now of why you went into the wine business. I read 
that you said that John Daniel had interested you in the wine 
business, too. 

Mondavi: When I came here to Napa Valley, whether I was swimming, whether I 
was playing football, or whatever I was doing, I wanted to excel. 
I would look around and see what could I do, where could I excel. 

When I came here, I was tremendously impressed by what I 
called the big four of the California wine industry. The big four 
at that time were Inglenook [of John Daniel, Jr.], B. V. [Beaulieu 
Vineyard], Beringer Brothers, and Larkmead. And frankly, I was so 
inspired by them, especially John Daniel, that I bowed my head as 
I went by Beaulieu and Inglenook. I was tremendously impressed 
because here they were making the style of wine that I thought was 
outstanding. 

And I always felt that I wanted to do something that would be 
comparable to what they were doing. We were only in the bulk wine 
business in the beginning. I would be tasting their wines, and I 
talked to my father about eventually going into the fine wine 
business because I knew in my own mind that if we were going to 
stay in the business, that sooner or later the more expensive 
grapes of Napa Valley if we didn't bottle the wine, we could not 



11 



afford to compete with the San Joaquin Valley because they bought 
their grapes at much lower prices. 

I talked to my father about that. I always wanted to make a 
wine that I thought belonged in the company of these wineries, 
especially Inglenook and B. V. I began to taste my wine, and I 
used to compare it with their wines. And I became convinced that 
we could produce wine, I thought, just as good as they did. I 
wanted to eventually get into the fine wine business. I did talk 
to my father about it. 



12 



III CHARLES KRUG WINERY 



Purchase by Cesare Mondavi. 



Mondavi: Then a golden opportunity came when Paul Alexander, who was the 

manager of the Bank of America here in St. Helena, came to me in 
March of 1943. He said, "Bob, I know that you are 'very much 
interested in going into the fine wine business. Your family 
really belongs in that. There's a golden opportunity for you to 
buy the Charles Krug winery." He said, "However, you are going to 
have to act pretty quickly because I know that James K. Moffitt, 
the owner of Charles Krug, left for Los Angeles. And I know there 
is a man from the Midwest" he didn't give me the name at that 
point "who wants to buy it." He said, "I think this would be an 
ideal set-up for you. You should see it. If you don't act on it, 
I'm afraid that it might be sold to this other fellow." 

I knew my father was an ultraconservative man. Unless you 
could really lay out a program for him, he would not be 
interested. At that time, they had the price freeze on wines. 

Teiser: Wartime? 

Mondavi: During the wartime. And they froze our price of wine at twenty- 
eight cents a gallon at that time. 

Jack Riorda had passed away in 1940, and I took charge of the 
business. Jack Riorda's son-in-law worked in the winery and 
worked with me and under me at the Sunny St. Helena Winery. 

Teiser: What was his name? 

Mondavi: Fred Beroldo. Rena Beroldo was the daughter of Jack Riorda. 

But at that time they froze the prices of wine at twenty- 



13 



eight cents. I tried to get them to expand the winery so that we 
could bottle wine and not be under this freeze, so we could sell 
at a higher price. But they were not interested in adding a 
bottling room or going into any further expansion of the winery. 
They said no, that was it. 

So when Paul Alexander told me that we should look at this 
winery, I then thought that what we could do is buy the bulk wine 
from the Sunny St. Helena Winery. I worked out a plan and said, 
"Dad, if we buy the wine at the same price, where they could make 
their profit, then we will bottle the wine at the Charles Krug 
Winery." And I made the whole program up, and with the profits 
that we would make there, we would eventually pay for the Charles 
Krug Winery. 

Teiser: You could sell bottled wines at higher prices? 

Mondavi: That's right. You see, that wasn't frozen because that was 
something new. And we could establish our own prices. 

Fred Beroldo and Rena Beroldo said, "Fine, you buy the wine 
from us, and you do what you want to do." So I went to my 
father I can always remember this because this was on Saturday I 
left my work here and told my mother I was coming in and I wanted 
to talk to Dad. And by chance my brother who was in the service 
had come home from Fresno,. 

I talked to to my father, and I told Dad that there was this 
winery and that it was an ideal solution for us to get into the 
bottling of our wines and going into the fine wine business. That 
the future of Napa Valley would be in the fine wine business. My 
dad listened to me. And then I told him that if we buy this wine 
from Sunny St. Helena, give them the full mark-up, we could then 
sell this in gallon jugs and in fifths, and pay for it that way. 

The price at that time was $75,000 for the whole Charles Krug 
Winery. There were just under a hundred and fifty acres. I 
remember I was talking to my father alone at that time, in his 
den. And he was sitting back, a man of few words. And then he 
got up. He always smoked a little stogie, one of those little 
Italian stogies. And he walked into the living room, and back in. 

And he said, "You know, I'm happy. I don't have to get any 
bigger than what we are." He said, "I don't want to be as big as 
Cella." At that time Cella* was as big as Gallo is now. It was 



*The Cella family owned the Roma Wine Company 



14 



the biggest company in the wine business in California. He said, 
"I don't want to be as big as Cella. I'm happy to do what I'm 
doing." 

So that's all he said. And then he went upstairs to his 
bedroom. My mother was listening to this whole thing in the 
kitchen. She heard the whole conversation. Then I went to my 
mother. I said, "Mother, we've got to do something. We can't let 
this opportunity go by, otherwise I'm going to have to find 
someone. It's such a golden opportunity, we have to do 
something." 

Then we went to bed. The next morning we went down to 
breakfast. We had a little breakfast nook, and my dad came in. I 
said, "Good morning," and I was trying to think of what am I going 
to tell my father. What can I do to convince him that he should 
go and see the winery and just look at it anyway? And my father 
just said a few words. He said, "Good morning. When do we go to 
St. Helena?" I looked at him in great amazement, and I said, 
"Well, now." 

And my brother had come in that night. I said, "We can leave 
right now and visit." He said, "Fine." So there was my brother, 
who was in uniform, and my father and myself. We went to St. 
Helena and went through the winery. There were two homes up 
there, a nice main house plus a foreman's home. (We didn't go 
through the houses.) And there was a hundred and fifty acres, and 
of course, the winery and the stable. 

After we went through the whole place, my dad, as we came out 
of the stable, looked down and he said, "You know, the price is 
well worth it." He was very fond of it. And he said, "How much 
do you think it would take to really put this into operation?" 
Well, I gave a figure, a half a million dollars I believe, I 
forgot what it was that I said. He said, "No, no. It would take 
a lot more than that to do it," in which he was right. 

I said to him, "Would you mind seeing Mr. Moffitt? He's 
coming back." And he said, "Well, let's talk to him." So I 
called Paul Alexander, and we made an appointment to go to San 
Francisco. My brother actually asked for a day or two leave 
because he wanted to go with us. So we went to San Francisco to 
visit James K. Moffitt. And James K. Moffitt was a very 
successful businessman. He was a trustee at the University of 
California of Berkeley. He was very, very wealthy, one of the 
wealthiest fellows in the Bay Area. He was also the chairman of 
the Crocker First National Bank. 

Teiser: Is that where you went to see him, at the bank? 

Mondavi: Yes, at the Crocker. We went in. And here was Peter, Paul 



15 



Alexander, my father and myself. He said, "Come on, let's go into 
my inner sanctum." He had his little inner sanctum there. We 
went in there. He was saying, "Gee, how wonderful it is to have 
two boys who will carry on your business," because he had only a 
daughter. So he said, "It's so wonderful to be able to pass 
something like this on." 

We were talking about general conditions. The telephone 
rang. And the next thing I heard Mr. Moffitt say, "I'm sorry, I 
just sold the property to a Cesare Mondavi." I looked with great 
surprise at my father and at our banker, as not one word was 
discussed about the winery. 

I didn't realize that James K. Moffitt had tremendous faith 
in Paul Alexander, and that he put the sale of the property into 
Paul Alexander's hands. And he had agreed with Paul Alexander 
that this is the family that should own the winery; they are 
interested in wine, and they are a wonderful family. 

We didn't know anything about this. And the next thing it 
was a forgone conclusion that it was sold only because Paul was 
convinced and convinced him of that. James K. Moffitt refused the 
sale to two or three other people because he didn't think they 
would do justice to the property. He wanted to pass it into the 
hands of people who are really interested. 

Then the next thing I knew, when we heard that on the 
telephone, my father and he were negotiating on interest rates on 
the property. In other words, my dad said, "I'll put so much 
down," and then they were negotiating I think it was from four 
and a quarter to four and a half percent interest rate at that 
time. And Mr. Moffitt would be willing to carry the balance as a 
note. 

When we got through he called his secretary. He dictated a 
few things to her. He said, "Let's go have lunch." We went to 
the Poodle Dog. We had lunch. We came back. My father signed 
the paper, James K. Moffitt signed the paper, and we owned the 
property. I never realized my father, who was an ultra- 
conservative man, would ever move that rapidly. You see, by fate 
the thing just turned that way. 

I was so surprised, I couldn't believe it. I couldn't sleep. 
I couldn't sleep the two nights before because I was so excited 
about the possibility of this thing. And then it took me a long 
time to calm down because here we were: we had purchased this 
property. The thing went along very well. 



16 



Renovating and Getting Started 



Teiser: 



Mondavi: 



Teiser: 
Mondavi : 



Teiser: 
Mondavi: 



Let me take you back. 
Charles Krug? 



Someone else had been making wine there at 



What happened before to Charles Krug James K. Moffitt leased it 
out to Louis Stralla, and Louis Stralla made bulk wine for Cella 
during all that period of time. Then he moved out of there a 
couple of years before that and [in 1940], he bought a place in 
Oakville, a winery, and he began to work there. Actually the 
winery was closed when we went through it. It wasn't operating. 



Did it have much equipment in it? 



It 



No. In fact, all dirt floors. They had old tanks in there, 
had gone through the earthquake and the walls were a little 
cracked. And the second floors were not in good repair. What we 
did, we renovated the whole winery. We took out all the tanks. 
We got rid of all the tanks. 

Redwood? 

The redwood tanks, because I didn't want to have the old tanks that 
give you off-flavors. I realized one thing, that you needed clean 
oak. You needed clean barrels to produce the kind of wines that I 
was interested in. We took those all out. We used them for 
binning our wines in the stable, which we converted into an aging 
cellar. We made some bins with the staves of the redwood tanks. 
And then we put all new tanks, and all cement floors. We 
reinforced the walls to make it earthquake proof. We did a lot of 
work. 

And one of the things that I found I had to do during the 
war years you had to have priorities. You couldn't build without 
priorities. I remember going to the federal offices in the 
Furniture Mart building on Van Ness, at about Tenth Street. I 
used to go visiting this federal agency that was in charge of 
building during the war trying to convince them that they should 
give us double-A priority, I think, in order to buy materials to 
build, or rebuild the winery. I went there for about two weeks, 
three weeks, constantly trying to meet the head man. I'm trying 
to think of his name now. I was always given the run-around. But 
I kept going back. 

Finally he saw me. I explained to him what I wanted to do, 
that we wanted to get into the fine wine business, but also into 
making the best popular priced wines possible. And then he said, 
"Well, we are cutting everything down, but we want to keep ten 
percent of our business alive to keep this a going entity. I'm 



17 



willing to work with you. It seems that your project is a good 
one." They were trying to keep a skeleton of the industry alive. 
I was able to convince the government that we should be one of 
them. So he gave us the double-A priority to buy barrels, cement 
and building materials. 

When I got that, the following year I would go again. And 
then the following year I would go. As long as we had that 
double-A priority, we were able to get things to rebuild the 
winery during the war years when most people couldn't do it. 

Teiser: When did you first make wine there then? 
Mondavi: We made wine in 1943. 
Teiser: The first year you owned it. 

Mondavi: Yes, the first year. We were actually putting tanks up and 
pouring wine into them. 

Teiser: What kind? 

Mondavi: They were open fermenters, just redwood fermenters. The staves 

were six foot tall. We used those. As a tank was built, we were 
crushing grapes and pumping wine into it. It was amazing. It was 
crazy. 

Teiser: What time of year did you buy the winery? 

Mondavi: We bought it in March of 1943. 

Teiser: It was that same year that the Acampo Winery was sold. 

Mondavi: That's right. My dad then sold his interest of the Acampo Winery 
and invested in the Charles Krug Winery. 

Teiser: Apparently everybody in Acampo sold to people who hadn't been in 
it. 

Mondavi: That's right, yes. That's when my dad then invested in Charles 
Krug. It was called C. Mondavi & Sons. He had called it [his 
business] C. Mondavi & Sons when we started nailing boxes for him, 
even though we weren't doing any of the business at that time. So 
he got us in that way. 

Teiser: He continued shipping? 

Mondavi: As long as he lived, he continued shipping, yes. He used to ship 
more grapes in the beginning. But always, he shipped grapes. 

Teiser: Other produce too? 



18 



Mondavi: He used to have other produce before. He used to ship 

canteloupes, cherries, lettuce and vegetables. He didn't go into 
that after we bought the Charles Krug winery. He just concen 
trated on the grapes and would oversee the winery. 

Teiser: What condition were the vineyards in when you bought the winery? 

Mondavi: There were about twenty-five acres or so that were not planted. It 
was a very old, old vineyard, and it all had to be replanted. 
They didn't have quite the right varieties that we wanted. Little 
by little we began to replant all the vineyards. The land was 
very good land. We wanted to put in later Cabernet, Chardonnay, 
Riesling, and better varietal grapes. They had the lesser variety 
of grapes at that time. As soon as we bought the Charles Krug 
winery, we began to look at the future and began to plant the 
better variety of grapes there. 

Teiser: When did you get your bottling line in? 

Mondavi: It's crazy. All we did was we bought a bottling line, and we put 
it in one wing. We would bottle wine there. We would put it 
through the window. We didn't even have time in the beginning for 
a door. We would put the cases through a window, into a railroad 
car that was outside the building. And that's the way we bottled 
for about the whole year. 

Teiser: You started bottling in '43 then? 

Mondavi: In '43, yes. 

Teiser: Bottling Sunny St. Helena wine? 

Mondavi: We bought the wine from Sunny St. Helena, and we bottled it. We 
paid the same price that Sunny St. Helena received before, except 
we did the bottling and shipped it east. 

Teiser: How did you label it? 

Mondavi: I thought I would be very clever. I suggested to my father I 
remember we had quite a difference on this. 

First of all, maybe I should tell you how the labeling came 
about. When we bought the winery we appointed R.U. Delapenna, 
which was a very fine importer that was a wholesale company.* We 



*See also p. 26 



19 



Teiser: 
Mondavi: 



went to talk to them, and they were interested in having our 
wines. At that time we hadn't come up with a name yet. 

I said, "You know, Dad, we ought to use our name. The 
Mondavis are going to make the wine, we should call it Mondavi." 
R.U. Delapenna said, "You know, Mondavi is not a well known name. 
Krug is a very famous name. In fact there is a Krug and Company 
in France which produces some of the outstanding wine of Europe, 
Champagnes. Not only that, this [Chares Krug] is the oldest 
operating winery, it has a history. That would be much more 
valuable than having a Mondavi name." 

I said, "We're going to make the wine. We should have the 
credit for making it. And if we succeed it will go to us, if we 
don't, we fail." My dad listened to the two of us; dad agreed to 
go with R. U. Delapenna. And that's why you find Charles Krug as 
being our premium wine. Then I said, "All right, if that's the 
case, we'll make our secondary wine, our more popularly priced 
wine, C. K." So we called it "C. K. , produced and bottled by C. 
Mondavi & Sons." It was Charles Krug. We had "Charles Krug, 
produced and bottled by Charles Krug Winery." And this is the way 
we came up with our name. 

I remember when I was talking to my father about buying the 
winery. I said, "Dad, you know the purpose of what we want to do 
here. What you can do in order to save taxes is to make a living 
will: by that you could form a partnership in which the children 
can be included, Mary, Helen, Peter, and myself, and of course 
Mother and you. But you could set it up so that for tax purposes 
in the future we won't have to pay a lot of taxes, and yet you 
could have control of the business." I did suggest that to my 
father. 

And sure enough, we got our attorneys, and that's the way he 
set the company up. He set it up where we had four twenties. My 
father at that time felt that since my sisters were married and 
had husbands who were supplying a certain amount to them, that he 
should allow the boys to have double the interest. That's how he 
came up with twenty percent for Peter, twenty percent for myself. 
My mother and he both had twenty percent. That's how we came into 
that percentage. That was his thinking. 

You had an awful lot to do in 1943, didn't you? 

Yes, there was a lot going on, very, very much so. It was very 
difficult because we were building a winery. We had to get a 
permit to operate it. Second we had to get the priority to be 
able to buy the equipment, the tanks, and building materials for 
the winery. 



20 



Teiser: Even bottles were in short supply, weren't they? 

Mondavi: That's right, everything. It was very difficult. I was very 

lucky. I guess I was rather energetic. I kept always trying to 
find out where I could get more. But I always had faith in our 
industry here. I knew we could do a lot. I was very optimistic. 
And we were rather fortunate because were able to get our share 
plus a little bit more. 

Teiser: I suppose updating a winery never stops but how long did it take 
you to get it in shape? 

Mondavi: Let me say this. When we first made wine, I wanted to submit our 
wines to the State Fair. We were very fortunate. For four or 
five years, we won more gold and silver medals than any winery in 
the state. 



Making Wine .in the 1940s and 1950s 



Teiser: 
Mondavi : 



You have to remember that business was very difficult. We 
had an oversupply of grapes. They planted all those grapes during 
Prohibition, and then we had a surplus of about a quarter of a 
million tons of grapes each and every year almost until the 
sixties and seventies. We were in a very critical condition at 
that time. 

We began to really make progress in spite of the difficult 
times. But the business was tough. It was hard. We won awards. 
We were being acknowledged as being one of the top producers in 
the company of the finest, which was Inglenook, B. V., Beringer 
Brothers. We won more awards than anyone in the beginning there 
and began to get quite a name for ourselves. 

What kind of wines did you win awards for? 

We had Cabernet*, Pinot noir, Traminer, Riesling, Chardonnay, 
Zinfandel, Camay, Camay Rose, burgundy, chablis, and sauterne. 

## 



*Cabernet Sauvignon 



21 



We were winning many awards. Frankly, as we sold our wines 
to the various restaurants they acknowledged the fact that they 
were accepted. However, the business was not a lucrative 
business. It was a very difficult business. Wines were not 
considered as a way of life during those years. In fact, right 
after Prohibition, the wines that were made were generally very 
poor wines. And they weren't palatable wines, and the American 
public didn't drink wines. The only people that drank wines were, 
basically speaking, the immigrants that came over, especially from 
the Mediterranean area, that came here. And they would often make 
their own wine. They were the ones that drank wine during that 
period of time. 

However, the University of California began to teach enology 
and viticulture right after repeal. And then they began to teach 
the kind of grapes to plant, Cabernet, Pinot noir, Chardonnay, 
Sauvignon blanc, Riesling, and these, in the proper locations. 
And this is the thing that had been tremendous for the California 
wine industry because what happened, these enologists and 
viticulturists began to plant these better grapes in the better 
locations. 



In the sixties, for all practical purposes, the poor wines 
disappeared, and we began to make sound wines, big wines, rich 
wines. And the American people began to drink. And then from 
1968 on, we had what I call the wine revolution because sales of 
wine quadrupled in the next fifteen years, 1966 to 1981. The 
American people began to drink it because the wines were sound, 
they were good, they were big and rich. So the wine business 
began to pick up. I would say that the golden years of the wine 
business developed from 1966 through to '83. 

Teiser: Were you bottling also generic wines in the 1940s at Charles Krug? 

Mondavi: Our whole business in the beginning was bottling gallon jugs, 

half-gallon jugs of wine because we didn't make any fine wines at 
that time because we were just getting into fine grapes. We 
started to produce fine grapes, but that was very limited. And we 
didn't put fine varietal wines on the market for about three or 
four years. 

Teiser: When you did, those were the ones that won the awards? 

Mondavi: Those were the ones, yes. After we put those on the market. In 
'43 we made our first wine. Then '44, '45, -'46. However those 
wines weren't judged. They had to be aged three or four years. 
We began to win our awards in '46, '47, '48, those years there. 

But the business was rather difficult. After the war years, 
business was good. But then there was a recession in '47. During 



22 



1947 there was a terrible recession. And people were hurt, and we 

were badly hurt because at that time there was an overproduction 

of grapes. Things were very difficult. I know that we had some 

very, very tough times. 

We lost a lot of money in 1947 because the market dropped from 
about a dollar and half to fifty cents and twenty five cents a 
gallon. Most people were hurt. And we were hurt as well because 
we had a very big crush. We had an oversupply of grapes. It took 
years for that to adjust itself, and we worked very hard. They were 
really the very lean years from '47 on, up until in '66. 

Teiser: Did you have enough cooperage and enough storage space to hang on? 

Mondavi: We did, we did hang on. But we barely hung on because it was so 

tough. We were living, but we weren't getting much money from the 
business. All of us worked very, very hard, and it was a strain. 
As long as Dad was living things worked out very well because Dad 
was the patriarch. I was able to work with Dad because I worked 
with him all the time. That worked out well. 

When he passed away, then things became a little bit more 
difficult because there were misunderstandings. My mother became 
the matriarch at that time. I don't want to get too far ahead of 
the story here. 

Teiser: What was the relationship of C. Mondavi & Sons with Sunny St. 
Helena then? How did it continue? 

Mondavi: Actually, even when dad was shipping grapes, C. Mondavi & Sons had 
an interest in Sunny St. Helena Wine Company. In other words my 
dad had the controlling interest of the Sunny St. Helena Wine 
Company. 

We formed a co-op with the Sunny St. Helena Winery, with our 
growers so that they could participate, depending on what we sold 
our wine for, and also because we needed their support. We didn't 
have the money to pay the growers. So what we did we had the 
growers put in their grapes, and we had a deal with them whereby 
when we sold the wine they would then participate in the proceeds. 
This is how we carried on at the Sunny St. Helena Winery. 

From '35 to 1940, Jack Riorda was the manager of Sunny St. 
Helena Winery. He passed away. Then I took over in 1940 and 
became the manager, working under my father. And then we sold 
Sunny St. Helena Winery, I think in '45, and we concentrated all 
of our operations at C. Mondavi & Sons, which owned and operated 
the Charles Krug Winery. 

Teiser: And that was when you turned it into a co-operative? 



23 



Mondavi: We formed the co-op right after 1940. 
Teiser: What were your functions from '43 on? 

Mondavi: From 1943 when we bought the Charles Krug winery, up to '59, when 
my father passed away, I was in complete charge of the operation 
under my father. My brother was the production manager. In 1943 
I was in charge, naturally under my father. I set up the wine- 
making procedures. And then in 1947, my brother came in from the 
service. I turned over the winemaking procedures to him, but I 
was in charge of the over-all picture, that is the making of the 
wine, the selling of it. 



Broader Horizons 



I constantly took trips selling our wine, east, and called on 
all our trade. That's how I began to learn more about wines. As 
I traveled I began to drink more of other people's wines. I began 
to drink the great wines of the world. In the fifties I began to 
drink the Bordeaux, the Burgundies in my travels. And I began to 
realize there was another style of winemaking that they were 
carrying on over there. 

So I then took a trip in 1962 to find out what was going on, 
because I now was producing wine that belonged in the company of 
the finest California wines. But then I aspired to produce wines 
that belonged in the company of the greatest wines in the world. 
So I began to drink and taste the Bordeaux and Burgundies. I 
began to realize they were doing something there that was not due 
to the natural elements, the climate, the soil, or the grapes. 
There was something they were doing in their winemaking procedure. 

On my first trip to Europe in 1962, I went to Italy, 
Switzerland, France, Germany, Austria, and later on went to 
Australia. And I began to realize that they made their Cabernets 
completely different from their Pinot Noirs. They made the 
Chardonnays completely different from their Rieslings. 

So I began to adopt some of the principles they did over 
there. I began to realize that they used small barrels for aging 
their wines. I began to realize that they would make Cabernet by 
keeping it in contact with the skins much longer. I realized that 
the Pinot Noirs they would retain stems in making their wines. 
The Rieslings were made completely different from the Chardonnays. 
They were a very fresh fruity wine compared to the Chardonnays 
that were aged in small barrels and fermented differently. 



24 



So, that's what I began to do here, the operations changed 
completely. This is what catapulted the fine wines of California 
in the company of the fine wines of the world because up to that 
time, all of us in California would take either a Cabernet, or a 
Pinot Noir, or a Zinfandel, or a Barbera, and make it exactly the 
same. We then realized the big difference. We saw that the aging 
in barrels made a big difference, and also the way we fermented 
it made a big difference. 

Others in Napa and California followed. We helped set the 
tone and pace. We bought barrels in great quantities. The next 
thing you knew, other people began to do the same thing. We began 
to find distinct differences between our Cabernets and our Pinot 
Noirs, our Rieslings and Chardonnays, whereas before they were 
very, very similar. They didn't have the complexity and the 
character. So this is what has put California in the company of 
the fine wine-growing regions of the world. 

Teiser: Were people in Europe hospitable to you when you came? 

Mondavi: Very, very hospitable. They were very open. It's amazing, but it 
was funny. Their style of winemaking was more or less all the 
same. But when they made Cabernet, for instance, the first growth 
would have new barrels each year; others would have barrels used 
over and over again. And yet the wines taste completely different 
from one another. Even though they thought their procedures were 
the same, they were so different. 

In Burgundy they would retain stems when they made their wine 
and they fermented much warmer. And I was amazed the differences 
in what they did and how they differed from one another. Even 
though their techniques appeared to be the same, the wines ended 
up completely different, because some of them had new barrels, 
some had old barrels. Really, it's amazing the big contrast. 

We were trying to learn that in making wine you need not only 
the finest grapes, but you needed the finest barrels and the 
finest technique, and it had to be clean, and it had to reflect 
what I consider the fruit of the grape, with the aging and certain 
style of cooperage. It's a harmony between those two factors that 
gave you a complex and very fine wine. And this is the thing that 
we have been doing. And frankly, we have been able to help set 
the tone and pace in this regard. 

Teiser: Did you move away from redwood? 

Mondavi: We moved completely away from redwood. We had big redwood tanks 

at the Charles Krug Winery. We had the huge redwood tanks to make 
our vin ordinaire, our popularly priced wines. But we had nothing 
but small oak barrels to age our fine wine. Then I wanted to buy 




PETER AND ROBERT MONDAVI 
ca. 1953 



25 



Nevers oak barrels, French oak barrels, because 1 felt that they 
had a more subtle character. And I knew that the new barrels 
played a very important part. That was a difference that I had 
with my brother. I wanted to form a style of wine. We had some 
honest differences that would make a difference in style of wine. 

During that time my brother wanted to use old barrels. Today 
we're using mainly new barrels in our better wines. And we find 
that we have a different style. We find that we can get a price 
higher by doing what we're doing. And we can get those people who 
are accustomed to drinking wines of that style. Therefore we have 
been able to achieve higher prices, only because we knew that 
there is a certain group of people that like this style of wine. 
I don't say it's better. But they are willing to pay more money 
for it. It depends upon what you like. 

Teiser: Through all this, you have been apparently very successful at 
mar ke t ing . 

Mondavi: I didn't know what marketing was. People say, "Gee, who does all 
your public relations?" I didn't know what they were talking 
about. I said, "Well, I'm only being honest. I speak to people 
about what I do, how I do it. And that's all I do." I say, "What 
do you mean by marketing?" I'm now beginning to realize good 
marketing is being honest. I was sincere, I was honest about what 
I was doing. And I went out of my way to let people know what we 
were doing and explain what we were doing. It was the personal, 
honest touch. 

It seems that this was something that other people weren't 
doing, and especially the Europeans. When I used to have Michael 
Broadbent, Hugh Johnson, Cyril Ray, all of these people visit, 
they never knew how wines were made. They tasted the wines. They 
didn't realize the part that oak played, the part that stems 
played, what we did and how we handled it, the different 
temperature controls, and things like that. They knew none of 
that. I was just being very honest. And they questioned me for a 
while, but then they began to realize that there was something to 
it. 

If being sincere and honest, and telling people what you're 
doing is public relations, then it's public relations that we 
have. And we let the people know the differences that exist by 
using redwood, by using oak, by using oak that had what I call 
high toasting versus low toasting, by using a Nevers oak versus an 
American oak, using Yugoslavian Limousin oak. We carried on all 
that research work. 



26 



Selling and Publicizing Wines 



Teiser: 
Mondavi : 



I told you about R.U. Delapenna wanting to handle our wines 
at Charles Krug. And then we were going to get started with them. 
However, in the interim, McKesson [&] Robbins came in. They had 
international distribution. They were a very large company. And 
we made a contract with them to sell our entire output. We were 
to sell forty thousand cases the first year, sixty thousand the 
second, eighty thousand the third, and a hundred thousand cases 
thereafter. We had a ten-year contract. This was in "46. 

What happened the recession came along. We were all set 
with all these cases to go. We signed the agreement, and we 
shipped about four cars. All of a sudden the recession came about 
in '47, and they dismissed all their sales people they had some 
twenty salespeople except one. All these wines were put out on 
the market and nobody was selling them. 

That taught me a lesson. Then I said, "From now on, we're 
going to do our own selling." Even though 1 had a contract. I 
could sue, but by the time I spent the money suing, and going 
through the trial and tribulations, it would not be worth it. 
We'll sell our own wines. 

I worked with and through Jimmy [James] Beard, because he was 
an outstanding printer, one of the finest in the West. Not only 
that, I confided in Jimmy what I wanted to do, how I wanted to 
build the Charles Krug Winery. I worked with Jimmy to help create 
our labels and all our artwork, as well as getting his opinion on 
some of the policies of our winery. 

You had Malette Dean make some drawings. 

That's right, Malette Dean. And I got him through Jimmy Beard. 
Malette Dean came and did our work. In other words, we felt that 
wine was a living thing and that we had to personalize it. 
Malette was an outstanding artist on his own. And Jimmy was an 
outstanding printer. So I had these people that I worked with to 
do this work, and we became personal friends as well. 

Then I wanted to have a newsletter. So, I said, "Jimmy, what 
can we do? Could you write, or do you know of anyone?" He said, 
"Well, I have a man that I think you will find quite interesting 
and very good, 'Paco' Gould." Frank Gould. 

So I talked to him, and at that time I remember I said, 
"Frank, you know we are very limited in funds. The only way we 
can afford to do this is if you will take tours through the 
winery. We can pay you for taking tours through the winery. And 




1982 

Valley 

CABERNET SAUVIGNON 

ALCOHOL t J % BY VOLUME 
PRODUCED AND BOTTLED BY 

ROBERT MONDAVI WINERY 

O A K V I L L E , CALIFORNIA 




1978 

Valley 

CABERNET SAUVIGNON 

ALCOHOL IJ"! BY VOLUME 
PRODUCED AND BOTTLED BY 

ROBERT MONDAVI WINERY 

OAKVILLE, CALIFORNIA 



Labels designed by Mallette Dean 



27 



once we get enough money from our sales on the wine, we'll then 
get a secretary and then she can work with you." He said, "Fine, 
I'll make a deal with you." He said, "I'll write the newsletter. 
I'll take tours." Sure enough, before the year was up, he had 
made enough money so we could hire a secretary. And then he would 
dictate for our newsletter. So it worked out very well and was 
very successful. 

We talked about trying to figure a way to publicize our 
wine, and to get more growers. Then Frank Gould came up with the 
idea, "Why don't we hold a tasting like we do with Andre 
Tchelistcheff. Let's get some of the growers into one of our 
tastings." 

This idea came from wine tastings we were holding with Andre 
in the evenings in my home. I had approached Andre to consult 
with us at the Charles Krug winery to [help us] understand more 
about winemaking and wine tasting. I asked if he could get 
approval from his principals at B. V., which he did. So we had a 
buffet luncheon on the grounds and Frank was there, and my wife 
and the family. And we had our growers come in. And it was very 
successful. 

We said, "Gee, why don't we do that and expand it to the 
public." This is what we did. We began to invite the public. We 
would have about six, seven of these tastings during the summer 
months. We would invite about 250 or 300 people. They would come 
to taste these wines. And then they began to order these wines in 
the different restaurants. 

I remember going out to the wholesalers in San Francisco 
trying to get them to handle our wine. Nobody wanted it because 
it was an unknown entity. Charles Krug was dormant and unknown. 
I couldn't get anyone. The next thing I knew, just before a year 
was up, when we had these tastings, Henry Cristiani, a wholesaler 
in San Francisco, called me on the phone. He was one of the men 
we approached. He said, "You know, I'm getting calls for your 
wine. Do you mind if I handle the wines?" I was very honored 
because I was trying to get people to handle it but they wouldn't 
do it. 

We started with that. And this is how we built up our 
business. We had wine tastings on the lawns and people became 
interested in our wines, talked about them, and began ordering 
them in restaurants and retail outlets. These wine tastings 
started from the tastings we had in the evenings for our 
production people, which included Andre Tchelistcheff, Jimmy 
Beard, Frank Gould, our staff, mainly the Charles Krug staff on 
Monday nights. 

We were creating this interest within our own people because I 



28 



realized that unless they understood what we were trying to do, we 
would not get the kind of wines we wanted. 

Teiser: Did Andre Tchelistchef f bring some concept of European styles of 
wine? 

Mondavi: Andre Tchelistchef f was a man that I used to give me the whole 
concept. We did all of his research work. We knew that he had 
all the background, having gone through enology school in Europe. 
We knew he was one of the outstanding producers of wine here. 
Whatever he wanted to do, I listened to it. And I adopted the 
principles, whereas I could do things that he couldn't do because 
we owned our winery, and would try everything. He was the one 
that came in with many ideas. 

And very frankly, he was very, very helpful to me in trying 
different things. And I did. I tried all these things. Then we 
would taste the wine after we did that. And that encouraged him to 
do many things since we were free to experiment, and at B. V. he 
did not have that liberty. However, he profited by this, and so 
did we. And we were happy to do it. It was an exchange. We 
were, at Charles Krug, really the research phase of winemaking 
here. 

Not only that, I called AndrH to form the Napa Valley 
Technical Group. I said, "Andre, why don't we form a group of 
people? Let's bring in Louis Martini, Inglenook, Beringer 
Brothers. Let's have a little seminar, a group where we would 
meet and exchange the ideas of winemaking so that we can further 
the cause of winemaking by all of us." I was very open to these 
things. 

We called the meetings together. After about the third 
meeting, one or two of the people said, "Gee, we're giving away all 
our secrets." I said, "Oooh!" Then I lost interest because all 
they wanted to do was to have the ABCs of winemaking. They didn't 
want to get into the detail of what to do. Then the Napa Valley 
Technical Group became what I called, for a number of years, an 
eating group where you got together and discussed superficial 
things, but not getting into the real heart of the things. We 
went to the meetings, but frankly, they weren't as effective as 
they should have been. 

So I carried on my own work, my own research work within our 
own group. That's why we have done all of our research work. And 
we have been very open. And I think if you travel around you'll 
find that people will realize that we have been open. We have a 
lot of concern about our research work that we carry on. We are 
willing to talk to people about it. There is no one that will do 
anywhere near the kind of research work that we do right here.* 
But we used to do it over there then and I wanted to exchange 



*At the Robert Mondavi Winery. 



29 



Teiser: 



Mondavi: 



ideas with people at that time. And if they didn't want to come, 
fine, I did it alone. 

Another aspect of the marketing, what importance did you place upon 
restaurants as compared to retail outlets? 

I would say this, that I knew that for fine wines, that it would 
be more important if I could get the restaurants to accept our 
wines, that I would be more secure of being able to get my prices. 
I knew that what we would have to pay here would be higher prices 
for grapes. And if we made the wines the way we should make them 
that they would be closer to the first growths or the better wines 
of Europe. I realized that the restaurants would be the places 
where I could get a better price more consistently. 

Yes, there were some very good retail shops. But I put more 
emphasis on trying to sell to better restaurants and get accepted, 
because once you had that, it was easier 



Mondavi: We were able to convince these [restaurant] people. And once we 
got them with us, they would be more loyal, and they would work 
with us, realizing that we would have continuity, because we knew 
that we could have a continuity of style and character. And we 
knew that our wines belonged in the company of the finest, whether 
it be here or overseas. And we had that confidence. It was not 
easy. But we felt that once we won over the principal 
restaurateurs, we would be in safer hands where they could afford 
to pay better prices. 



Building Vo lume 



Teiser: 
Mondavi: 



Teiser: 
Mondavi: 



What about volume? 

The volume was more than ample. As far as we were concerned there 
was more than enough room to sell to the better restaurants. Not 
only that, but because it cost a lot of money to buy barrels, to 
buy wines, and to build a business, we could build slower, more 
intelligently that way. We felt the increase was ample for what 
we wanted. 

Did you keep producing more each year? 

Yes, we did. We continually did that. We found that we had to 
increase our volume of popularly priced wines in order to break 



30 



our "overhead nut." I used to tell my father, I remember, "Well, 
Dad, unfortunately, we have to have more, especially in our 
popularly priced wines. We have to have more volume to take care 
of our what I call our "overhead nut 1 ." We increased from five to 
ten percent a year. That's what we did constantly. And then we 
got to a point where we began to make some money. 

Teiser: Where did you get the wine for your bulk wine? 
Mondavi: We made all our own. In fact, we are unique 
Teiser: I'm sorry, I meant where did you get the grapes? 

Mondavi: In the beginning when I was at Charles Krug winery they used to 

come from Napa Valley, but then as our sales increased we began to 
bring grapes from the San Joaquin and crush them at the Charles 
Krug Winery. We don't do that anymore. 

Teiser: You don't here at the Robert Mondavi Winery? 

Mondavi: No. At the Robert Mondavi Winery in Napa Valley we crush only 

Napa Valley grapes. We have a separate winery on Woodbridge Road 
near Lodi where we crush north and central coast as well as 
northern San Joaquin [valley] grapes. 

Teiser: Did you blend them then at Krug? 

Mondavi: Our Charles Krug wines were mainly from Napa Valley grapes. Some 
came from Sonoma; very little. Our C. K. was blended with Napa 
Valley, but a greater percentage of the San Joaquin. 



Industry Organizations and Activities^ 
[Interview 2: April 19, 1984] 



Teiser: You began to be interested in the Wine Institute when you were 
fairly young, I believe. 

Mondavi: Well, when I was at the Sunny St. Helena Wine Company in '38 I 

began to go to some of the meetings, but I wasn't a member of the 
board until we purchased the Charles Krug Winery. From that point 
on, I was a member of the board of the Wine Institute, and then 
became its chairman in '62 and '63 for a couple of years [1962-3 
and 1963-4 terms]. Then I had been a board member up until just 



31 



recently, when both my sons became members of the Wine Institute.* 
I am ex officio, naturally. I attend meetings, some of the 
executive board meetings. I attend the annual meetings. I am 
very much interested. And I played quite an important part in 
trying to get this so-called marketing order with the growers and 
the vintners together.** So I think I've been helpful in bringing 
that together, just as Mirassou*** and a few others have. I have 
been a strong advocate along that line for a number of years. 

Teiser: Were you active on the Wine Advisory Board when it existed? 

Mondavi: Yes, I was. I was on the Wine Advisory Board. In fact, it was 
through my efforts that we formed the premium wine group [the 
Premium Wines Public Relations Subcommittee of the Wine Advisory 
Board]. What I wanted to do originally I felt that Napa Valley 
should have an organization whereby we would be able to carry on 
public relations work in behalf of Napa Valley. So I called John 
Daniel, Aldo Fabrini of Beaulieu, John Daniel of Inglenook. And 
then of Beringer Brothers, Fred Abruzzini, and then there was 
Brother Tim [Timothy], I think, with Christian Brothers. 

I wanted to form a little committee where we could raise a 
small amount of money and appoint a public relations director for 
the Napa Valley. At that meeting, we met at John Daniels's office 
in Inglenook. What took place in our conversation, Aldo Fabrini 
felt that it should encompass more than just Napa Valley. I said, 
"Well, if it should encompass more than Napa Valley, then what we 
should do is take the key leading fine wine producers of the state 
of California and get money from the Wine Advisory Board," because 
they were raising about two million dollars a year, "And let's get 
a certain fund from them." I suggested that we get Lou [Louis] 
Gomberg at that time, who could contact the other fine wine 
producers. So we all put in, I think it was a hundred or two 
hundred dollars apiece to pay Lou Gomberg to contact the other 
members, that is fine wine producers of the state of California. 
And we got together. 

We then made a presentation to the Wine Advisory Board, saying 
that we would like to have sixty thousand or seventy thousand 
dollars to be able to promote the fine wines of California. And 
that's how we formed the fine wine public relations program. It 



*Timothy J. Mondavi is a board member for District No. 5, and R. 

Michael Mondavi for District No. 7. 

**The marketing order that in 1984 created the Winegrowers of 

California 

***Edmund A. Mirassou 



32 



Teiser: 
Mondavi: 



started because I wanted to get something started in Napa. We got 
more publicity with that sixty or seventy thousand dollars than 
they had with all the advertising; they had spent over a million 
dollars. 

What went on, we then began to spend more money. As the 
large producers of wine began to realize the effect of this public 
relations program, they put more money in. They put in a hundred 
thousand, then two hundred thousand, than a half a million. Then 
they wanted to come in and run the show. And we agreed, all 
right, as long as they would speak on fine wines, take a certain 
portion of that and put their best foot forward. In other words, 
we wanted to have our best foot forward when we spoke about 
California wines. That's what took place. 

And then we began to spend a considerable amount of money 
just on public relations, which was very effective. That's when 
we had the blind tastings, California wines versus French wines. 
That's when we had tastings overseas. That's when we had tastings 
in the schools. And then we had educational programs for the wine 
writers. We began to raise the image of California wine with the 
American people. This was a big step forward. 

Then unfortunately, politically, in '75, they dropped the 
Wine Advisory Board. Since that time we have no real effective 
educational program to teach the American public about our wine. 
Nor an aggressive program to continue educating the wine writer on 
the quality of our wines as contrasted with the foreign wines. 

What happened, really, during that period of time, the big 
wineries were trying to out-promote one another and telling each 
other that their wine was better than the other, which gave a bad 
impression on the American public. In the meantime, the foreign 
wines were able to come in because they didn't condemn anybody's 
wine. The American people got the impression that there must be 
something wrong with the California table wine. They didn't 
realize what they were doing, because everybody said, "My wine is 
better than yours," implying some California wines were not as 
good as they should be. Negative thinking. 

Those are the ads naming other wines? 

That's right. And all they did was create a mental picture in the 
American people that our wine mustn't be as good. The foreign 
wines were saying their wines are good with food, their wines were 
good this way and that. Not only that, then we called our wines 
"jug wines." All these connotations of what we were doing was 
smacking against the American people's appreciation for our wine. 
And we've done nothing to correct that. 



33 



Now we are trying to work what I call a joint marketing 
program with the growers. We have finally gotten to the point of 
realizing maybe we haven't done our best. Not only that, there is 
an over supply of grapes. There is an oversupply of wine. There 
is an oversupply of wines in Europe, in France, and in Italy, and 
in Spain. And we are just going to hurt ourselves if we don't do 
something about it to let the people know exactly what our wines 
have. So we are at the threshold, right today, of possibly 
coming out with a program that can be very helpful in the long 
run. 

And I think that we all are going to be surprised that even 
though there are certain basic differences between the growers and 
the wineries, there aren't any differences because what we are 
trying to do is get the highest price possible for the grower. 
The only way you can do this is by selling wine at a good price. 
I think that it will take a little while to try to resolve our 
differences, but we are going to find that there's going to be a 
lot more good done by working together. 

I'm hopeful that this will take place within the next six 
months.* If it does, you're going to see that we are on our road 
again to building something that for a while we were doing a very 
good job at. At one time California wines were an unknown entity 
with the American people. Since 1968, let's say '68 on, frankly 
that educational program began to develop, and our wines were 
better, and we began to become a factor. 

When we hurt ourselves is when the prices About three years 
ago the prices of foreign wines, basically the French and the 
Italian wines, were much higher, relatively speaking. And we 
raised our prices as fast as we could in line with the foreign 
wine prices. And then an over-supply took place in Europe, in 
France, Italy, and in Spain. And they began to drop their prices. 
The American dollar got much stronger. Then all of a sudden the 
foreign wines came in here much cheaper, and the American people 
were upset that we kept our prices so high. And we did, 
relatively speaking, compared to the foreign wines coming into the 
market. So the people on the East Coast, and the Midwest as well 
as the West Coast, began to buy, once again, more of the foreign 
wines. 

We did not move fast enough in that regard. We are beginning 



*The marketing order creating the Winegrowers of California was 
voted in and was announced by the state Department of Food and 
Agriculture on August 16, 1984. 



34 



to move now. We are beginning to get prices that are lower 
because of the over-supply that we have, plus some of our wines 
were over-priced. Our wines are better as a class. And yet our 
people aren't aware of it, only because we are selling "jug wine," 
and we're telling everybody, and we have been telling everyone, 
that so-and-so's wine is not as good as ours. The American people 
have gotten the impression that it must be that the foreign wines 
are better. So we have to change that whole idea around in the 
American mind. We didn't realize what we were doing to ourselves. 
This is the way I see it. 

Teiser: To go back to the Wine Institute, what were your main 

contributions in the time that you were most active in it? 

Mondavi: My main contribution, I could say, was that I wanted to bring to 
the attention of the American people that we had fine wines that 
belonged in the company of the finest wines of the world, because 
up to that time, everybody talked about California wines, and 
California wine was one denomination, a generic wine. It came 
from the San Joaquin, or it came from the north, but it was all 
the same. Well, it wasn't the same. 

And I wanted to bring to the attention of the American people 
that we had Cabernet, Pinot noir, Chardonnay, Johannisberg 
Riesling, or we had Riesling, we had Sauvignon blanc. I wanted 
them to know that these wines belonged in the company of the 
finest in the world. What we were doing before that time was one 
big ball of wax. And I can assure you no one gave consideration 
to the fine wines of California. I realized we had the natural 
elements, the climate, the soil, the grape vines, to produce wines 
belonging in the company of the greatest wines of the world. I 
took a trip to Europe and realized that they made their wines 
differently. 

[Interruption] 

Teiser: Soon after you were chairman of the Wine Institute board you left 
Charles Krug. 

Mondavi: My father passed away in '59. So we ran the company. You have to 
remember, if you go through the history of the California wine 
business, you will find that we had an oversupply of grapes. Ever 
since the beginning, from 1933 on, up to the Second World War in 
'43, '44, '45, then we had a period in which, the government 
wanted raisins, the government wanted alcohol. And then we had a 
few very good years. Nineteen forty-five, '46, were very good 
years. And things began to boom. We began to build a lot more 
wineries. Things moved very, very well. But then we had a 
tremendous recession in 1947. In '47 there was a real crash. We 
had an oversupply of grapes. The people weren't buying wines as 



35 



we thought, and it took up until 1968 before things changed. In 
other words, we were going through what I call very trying times. 

Teiser: Were there marketing orders to attempt to help? 

Mondavi: They did have one right after 1948. And then they had another 

one*. Unfortunately it did not solve the problem, although it was 
a step in the right direction, trying to do something about it. 
But the times were very, very difficult. 

During that period of time, from '48 up to '68, those 
enologists and the viticulturalists that were trained at Davis** 
were planting the better grapes, making the better wine. What 
happened, the wines became much better. In the middle sixties, 
they became palatable. And the American people began to consume 
these wines socially and with their meals. That's when we had 
what I call the "wine revolution," from 1968 for the next fifteen 
years. Wine sales quadrupled over that period of time. These are 
what I call the "golden years" of the wine business. The thing 
began to move forward. 

Of course then we came up to 1981, '82, '83. That's when 
things began to slide because of the higher prices that we created 
in our wines and because of the cheaper prices of the Italian and 
the Spanish and the French wines that came into our country. We, 
relatively, kept our prices up higher. We had no active public 
relations program going forward. We hit what I call a rather 
tough period of time, which is this period that we're going 
through right now. 

However, there has been tremendous competition between each 
winery, and they are improving the quality of wine. As soon as we 
let the people know what we have, you're going to find that we 
will be able to do a better job than we have done in the past four 
or five years. We are going to be able to really keep from losing 
as much of that share of market to the foreign wines. We've been 
losing it pretty rapidly during the last four or five years. I 
think with a good promotional program, and realizing the quality 
of our wines, we'll be able to slow that down a bit. 

Teiser: I can see that one of the reasons that you're successful is that 



*A state marketing order for wine processors was in effect from 
June 20, 1949, to June 30, 1952. There was also a grape 
stabilization marketing order in effect from September 16, 1949, 
to December 11, 1950. 
**The University of California at Davis 



36 



you're looking ahead all the time. 

Mondavi: Unfortunately, I always look ahead. You're right. I'm living 
today, but I talk about tomorrow. 



Changes 



Teiser: Let me take you back to yesterday again. You left the Charles 

Krug organization during these years before things had started on 
an up trend again. 

Mondavi: I knew in 1966 I knew then that things were changing. And I 

expressed that. In fact, we brought in management consultants, 
McKinsey, at one time, to try to prove to my family that we are 
doing well. I brought them in and they went through and made a 
complete report that we were one of the leaders in the wine 
business and our business was going ahead very well. 

Teiser: About what year was this? 

Mondavi: That was in 1965, I think, 1965-66. I brought them in in order to 
have someone from the outside show that we were making good 
progress, and that's exactly what they showed. They showed that 
we had a good foundation, a good business. Now the question is, 
my brother [Peter] wanted to go slower, and they recommended 
selling or dropping our C. K. business, which was a big volume 
business. I didn't agree with them. I said, "We shouldn't drop 
our C. K. business." On the contrary, I said, "What we should do 
is not to phase it out, but to sell it and get an override, and 
let somebody else do it." But we spent a lifetime building a good 
popular-priced wine. 

What did happen, naturally, I was relieved of my position. 
And my brother took over. But he didn't change a thing. He 
carried on exactly the same program that we had before, not 
changing one iota, even though he felt certain that we should slow 
things down. His one concern was that I was going too fast. He 
continued the program that I had carried on and went right along, 
except that now he was in charge of it. 

And my mother was a matriarch. As long as my father was 
living, in order to resolve the difference I would go to my 
father. I had everything open, and my dad went along with me on 
the policies that we established with the family. My brother went 
along because as long as my father set up the deal everything 
rolled along very well. I thought everything was really in very 



37 



good shape, except that I never realized I was pushing this faster 
than my brother could take. 

During those trying times, we weren't making enough money for 
any of us because we were barely making enough money to go ahead. 
I wanted to get enough volume to be able to get more money to the 
family, and to carry on for the future with our children. The 
whole idea was to have our children come into the business with 
us. And I realized I had to take care of that overhead nut. Once 
I broke what I called the overhead nut, which unfortunately Peter 
wasn't quite as aware of, we could then be well on our way for our 
children and all. 

We were working very hard. Everybody in the family worked 
very hard. I suggested that we should bring in Joe [Joseph L.j 
Alioto, who I thought could be able to speak to my mother, since 
he spoke Italian. And I also thought that we should bring in Fred 
Ferroggiaro, who was the chairman of the finance committee of the 
Bank of America, as a member of the board of directors [of Charles 
Krug] to support and to talk with my mother. I remember Joe 
Alioto concurring in principle on what I wanted, and yet talking 
to my mother. My mother stuck very hard and clear to just doing 
what my brother wanted to do in his framework. And they went 
along with this thing, which was fine. 

Teiser: Fred Ferroggiaro too? 

Mondavi: And Fred Ferroggiaro went along too. Definitely, I was the low 

man on the totem pole. And I didn't agree with them, although Joe 
Alioto definitely agreed with my principle of going ahead and 
taking care of the business the way we wanted to. 

My mother was advised by these management consultants that 
they should have one person that should be in charge in order to 
get the business. And she decided that it should be my brother's 
time to have a chance at running the business. So she decided 
that that's what they would do. Mother wanted to be equal with 
all the children [i.e. her grandchildren], but there was an honest 
misunderstanding. She was advised that my son Mike should not be 
in on the business. Unfortunately, she didn't put a timetable 
that it should be five years or ten years. All she said was that 
Mike should not come into the business. 

Well, I had worked with my father and my mother. And the 
whole idea was that we were building this thing for the family. 
And not only that, since Mike was a youngster he wanted to be in 
the business. I told my mother this. I said, "Mother, we built 
this for the family. Here Mike has been wanting to come in, and 
all the other children." She said, "I'm sorry. He won't, because 
there is this difference of opinion. She wouldn't mention what it 
was. I knew what it was. I then said to her, "If that's the 



38 

case, Mother, what I will do, I'm going to build a winery." 



39 



IV THE ROBERT MONDAVI WINERY 



Establishing a New Enterprise 



Mondavi: I was approached by people that realized that there was a 

difference, and that wanted to go into business with me. And they 
would set up the company. I said, "What I could do, I'll 
establish a company." Since Mike wanted to be in the business, I 
would establish the Robert Mondavi Winery for Mike. And I would 
still remain with the family operation. And then Mike would have 
a small winery for fifteen to twenty thousand cases, and he could 
be in the business. I made a joint deal with Fred Holmes and Ivan 
Schoch in which they had fifty percent of the company and I had 
fifty percent of the company. I borrowed $100,000. And they put 
in $100,000. And we started a small winery. I would call it 
Robert Mondavi Winery, which is the same name as Mike's*. And 
Mike could get into the business, and run the business there. In 
the meantime, I would be with the family operation, with C. 
Mondavi & Sons, Charles Krug. 

My brother felt that we were competing against C. Mondavi & 
Sons and Charles Krug. And that's when I was told by Fred 
Ferroggiaro that I should be out on a leave of absense for ninety 
days. I was shocked at that, of course. The next thing I knew, I 
received a letter from Joe Alioto severing my connections with the 
family. I can assure you I was very upset. I couldn't sleep for 
three months because I spent twenty-nine years of my life, every 
day, working and creating something. 

However, this was really an unfortunate misunderstanding. I 
knew that my mother didn't want to hurt me. I saw her practically 
every other day, or every third day. I lived right across the 
way, went to her, explained the differences in that regard. 
Unfortunately, we couldn't resolve the difference. There were 
honest misunderstandings in the thing. 



*His full name is Robert Michael Mondavi. 



40 



Then I had to work with my son at the Robert Mondavi Winery, 
which was a very small winery. I realized that it was too small 
to feed both Mike and myself, so I had to expand the winery. Not 
only that, before, to be able to get enough money, I found that I 
would have to act as a consultant. So I became a consultant for 
the Guild winery and for Mirassou winery. 

Teiser: What did you do for them? 

Mondavi: I told them exactly what we were doing at the Robert Mondavi 

Winery, how to build fine wines. They were not in the fine wine 
business. They were basically in the bulk business. The Mirassou 
family was in the bulk business. 

Teiser: They hardly had a label by then. 

Mondavi: They didn't even have a label then. So they wanted to learn the 
art of making fine wines. The same thing with Guild. They were 
in the mass bulk jug business. But they also wanted to learn to 
make fine wines. I consulted with both of them in order to make 
enough money so that I could continue living within my own 
lifestyle. I had a five-year contract with Mirassou, and I had a 
one-year contract with Guild. That allowed me to continue living 
on the same compensation that I had before when 1 was getting that 
from Charles Krug, which worked out very well for my family. 

Before I really decided to build the winery and go on our 
own, I talked to the family. When we found that we had an honest 
difference, and I was put on the leave of absence, I brought all 
of my children back home to talk to them as they were going to 
school there was Mike, Marcie, and Tim.* Of course my ex-wife 
Marge** was at home. And I told them that I had an honest 
difference of opinion and philosophy in winemaking as compared 
with Peter, and I felt that during our lifetimes we would all be 
confronted with basic different philosophies. Where I wanted to 
excel in winemaking and make the finest, Peter's opinion was to do 
something less than that. 

I said that also, Mike was not going to be accepted in 
working at the C. Mondavi & Sons. I knew that Mike wanted to be 



*R. Michael Mondavi, Marcia Mondavi (later Borger), Timothy J. 

Mondavi 

**Marjorie Declusin Mondavi 



41 



in the wine business ever since he was a youngster. I suggested 
that what we could do, we could go into building this winery. I 
said, however, we would go through minimum five years, up to maybe 
as much as ten years, where we will be short of cash because the 
wine business was a difficult business. And I wanted them all to 
think of this very seriously, that we would not have the standard 
of living that we were accustomed to before. 

They went back to school. We then had a meeting about a 
month and a half or so later, and they all agreed that they were 
willing to take that sacrifice if they had to. So that's when we 
agreed to decide to build the other winery, realizing that they 
wouldn't have what we had in the past. Thank God, what happened 
was we agreed to start building the winery for Mike. 

Then I was let go and so we worked and built the winery up to 
where it is now. And I'm glad we did it because, frankly, Peter 
was able to do what he wanted at the C. Mondavi & Sons, Charles 
Krug Winery. And I was able to start from scratch. 



All the money I had was invested in the Charles Krug winery. 
We had no ability of being able to borrow money because all of it 
was tied up there. What I had to do was try to borrow as much 
money as I could from the bank. In fact, Ina and Bill Hart lent 
me fifty thousand dollars. And then I had the Mirassou family, 
who actually co-signed a note for another fifty thousand, with the 
Bank of America. So the Mirassou family actually assisted me, and 
I was able to borrow that fifty thousand. With the hundred 
thousand, I was able to match what both Ivan Schoch and Fred 
Holmes put into it. That's how we started the business. But that 

was all borrowed money. 



Teiser: That was a pretty brave thing to do at 

Mondavi: I was 55, probably, I think. In fact, I was along in years. Yet 
I had all the faith in the world. I also knew at that time, the 
business was moving, and that fine wine would come into its own. 
I was sold on that strongly. And I knew that if we wanted to 
create something, we had to do it then. I knew that big money was 
coming in to invest into the business, and I realized that if we 
didn't do something, then it would be too late. It would be much 
too difficult to do it later on. So I told my family that, and 
that's exactly what we did. 

We went ahead in 1966. We broke ground. We decided in 
February or March to go ahead, and decided to crush grapes that 
year. We worked with the Valley Foundry [and Machine Works], 
Pete Peters and Leon Peters, who worked closely with us to build 



42 



the winery. And we were able to build it in time to crush about 
four hundred ninety tons of grapes the first year. 

Teiser: What kind of a building did you have that first year? 

Mondavi: To be very honest with you, we had slabs out here. And we didn't 
have a building, because we were putting our tanks in. We had the 
crusher, and our fermenting area here. But we didn't have the 
building around it. All we had was slabs where we put our 
fermenting tanks on. And then we pumped from the fermenting tanks 
into other tanks. We finished building the building afterwards. 
People were plastering our building as we were making wine. We 
were at the process of building the building as we were making 
wine. Really, it was a rather complicated deal, but a very 
interesting time. And it worked out very well. 

Teiser: Did you start then shopping I used to go to Italy every year, 
and everybody seemed to know you in the Italian wine industry. 

Mondavi: More so in the French wine and the German wine, more so than 
Italy. 



Observations upon European Winemaking 



Teiser: 
Mondavi: 



From 1962 on, I took one trip or two a year, or more 
depending. My first trip in '62 I went through Italy, 
Switzerland, France, Alsace, Germany, and then Austria. Then I 
kept taking trips, but many more times into France and Germany. 

I had the impression that you had bought a lot of equipment in 
Italy. 

No, I bought more equipment from Germany, from Seitz, than I did 
from Italy. I had great respect for what they had in Italy, but I 
bought more German or French equipment; but I bought some from 
Italy as well. 

Piero Antinori, when he came here years ago, saw us when we 
had our barrels first at Charles Krug and then at this winery. He 
was startled to see all these barrels. He came back about three 
or four years later, and he saw us even going further. And then 
he began to take barrels and experiment with barrels at his winery 
in the Chianti region. Then he brought in [Emile] Peynaud of 
France to consult with him. Now he has Andre Tchelistcheff 
consulting with him. What we've done here, we've stimulated many 
people the world over; the same thing in the Bordeaux, Burgundy 
regions of France. We've had all the people in Italy over here. 




Photograph courtesy of Wines and Vines 
Above: Winery addition under construction, 1970 



Below: Winery addition, 1985 



Photograph by Ruth Te-iser 




43 



I was showing them what we did. In fact Pio Boffa [of the Pio 
Cesare winery of Alba, Italy] was a guest of ours for about three 
months. 

Teiser: He told me that before he had come here, he thought he knew 

exactly what to do. He said, "Afterwards, my mind was a little 
changed." 

Mondavi: He knew definitely. I tried to explain to him. At that time he 
thought that well, these people You'd be amazed. I was at Pio 
Boffa's recently. He had barrels hidden in one area of the 
winery. He's experimenting with barrels down there, and he's 
doing all the work. In fact, he had me check the barrels with 
him, and to smell them. I told him what I thought, at which he 
was very appreciative. Then he came back with his father, back to 
Napa Valley. We've been very open and very helpful to them. 

What they're doing is wonderful. And the grapes that they 
have are wonderful. But the style of wines that we were making 
are different. Because they have the old barrels and the old 
tanks, they do give a different flavor, you see, character. 
That's nothing wrong; I think it's very fine. But I said, "Why 
don't you make something that will reflected new coopering? You 
have beautiful grapes. It will give you another style." 

His uncle at that time his uncle was still living his uncle 
wouldn't let him do it. I said, "Make one barrel! Get one 
barrel." This was ten, twelve years ago. And I said, "Get your 
uncle to just buy one barrel. And then sell it to Larry Romano in 
San Francisco. Let him sell it for you. And then get your prices 
up on that." He went there to talk to his uncle. But his uncle 
said, "Absolutely not." They wouldn't budge come hell or high 
water on changing anything. 

The French are even worse in this matter. They have twenty 
barrels, ten barrels, fifty barrels. (A hundred barrels is a big 
operator in France.) But they will not change a thing. They're 
in their little world and they don't move. If you go to Burgundy, 
especially in Burgundy and places like that, they don't move. If 
you go four miles away, you're a foreigner. They don't travel 
that far. And they don't exchange ideas, you see. That's why 
it's going to be so difficult for France, much more so than even 
Italy. 

Italy has moved much more rapidly in changing their style of 
winemaking because they followed what we've been doing here. 
You'd be amazed what they're doing over there, and changes that 
are taking place. They have a darn good climate and good soil 
condition. And they are going to make some very outstanding wine. 
They are being a little bit more progressive than the French 
over-all. I'm talking over-all. 



44 



The French without a doubt have some beautiful wines, but 
they are few and far between. The others are good, but they are 
not what I call great wines. 

Teiser: Back to your own winery 



Attracting Capital 



Mondavi: What happened was I had some very good partners, Fred Holmes and 

Ivan Schoch. They were with us about eighteen months. I realized 
that we had to either get bigger I talked to Ivan Schoch and 
Fred Holmes and Mike. The four of us were on the board of 
directors here. We had crushed the first year 490 tons of 
grapes. And believe you me, Napa Valley was a closed corporation. 
Nobody could come in and nobody could buy any grapes. Well, the 
next year, we unexpectedly crushed a thousand tons, which was 
about five hundred tons more than expected because all these 
growers wanted to come in, and we didn't turn them down. 

We were a little bulging at that time. We either had to do 
one of two things. We had to either sell the excess wine that we 
had, that we made, or let the growers go. In discussing this, 
both Ivan Schoch and Fred Holmes felt that to have these growers 
and these good grapes has value to it. And so they said that what 
we should do is get more cash into the business. And I said fine. 
But I didn't want to dilute my fifty percent interest. So they 
said, "Well, fine." 

We had many people that wanted to come in. Any one of them 
we might have picked. But we knew we wanted someone who had the 
same philosophy as we did. That is, they wanted to excel in 
quality, and that we knew had integrity and honesty. At that time 
we had met Allen Ferguson, who was the head of the Rainier 
Brewery, and Gordon MacDonald, who was his assistant. They both 
came here, and they were very much interested in the same 
principle that we had. They made their beer in exactly the same 
way. They wanted to excel. They were a family operation. Their 
family had been in the brewing business, I don't know, a hundred 
years. Also, Molson had an interest, about a forty-nine percent 
interest in Rainier. But Molson [Companies] 'was also a family 
operation; it's the oldest corporation in America. 

I felt here was a natural. Here were two family operations 
who wanted to excel. We thought that we would call them on the 
telephone. We called them on a weekend, on Friday, that we were 



45 



thinking that maybe we would like to bring in a little more 
capital and we might open up to another partner. So they came on 
the following Monday; immediately they came down. I was 
surprised. They came to see me. "Bob," Ferguson said, "would you 
mind if we bought up all your partners, and we would treat with 
you exactly the same way? We will pay them a profit, but then we 
will give you the same amount for your share, giving the same 
value." 

I said, "But that's not the arrangement we made. The 
arrangement we made is that we would bring a partner in with us." 
He said, "But would that be all right if we talked to them?" I 
said, well, as long as their policy was exactly the same as what 
my policy was, it would be all right with me if they wanted to 
talk to them. They talked to Ivan and to Fred Holmes, and they 
offered them such a good deal they couldn't turn it down. They 
did the same thing with me. They gave me the same deal. 

Then we discussed the fact that we would build up to two 
hundred and fifty thousand cases, and that they had money in 
government bonds, and that they would be in a position to build 
this. I said, "I don't want to drop my fifty percent interest," 
but they said that we could establish voting and non-voting stock, 
and that in the voting stock we would maintain our relative 
position, in voting. 

So this is what happened. We had Rainier put considerably 
more money in. But we had the same vote that they did. So we had 
voting stock and non-voting stock. May I say, I was very, very 
fortunate. These people abided by the principles we agreed upon. 
We agreed that we would be in charge of the winemaking. They 
could check everything that we were doing, and they did very 
carefully. 

^ 

They were very helpful, because administratively, they were a 
very fine company. They taught us how to administratively run the 
company better then we did before because we didn't have the 
expertise that they did. They were very helpful to us in building 
this organization. As we went along, we went from fifteen 
thousand cases, five hundred tons, where now we crush nine 
thousand tons of grapes. But we built with them as we went along, 
and we had a very good relationship with our partners, Rainier. 

But the business was not an easy business to come by. The 
competition was keen. But we did very well. We were very, very 
pleased with the quality. We were very pleased with the progress 
we were making. 

Then a change came in when Molson, who was the forty-nine 
percent owner of stock in Rainier, wanted to sell their smaller 
companies. They had about five or six small companies which they 



46 



controlled. However they did not have controlling interest of our 
business here. I had the control of running the business here. 
They were interested in selling those companies in order to buy 
one bigger company, because they didn't want to have their 
management go to so many different operations. They wanted to put 
it all into one. Then it would be much easier for them to control 
it. 

They came to me. They said, "Bob, we find that the industry 
is very interesting here, but we want to pull out. We want you to 
be able to buy the company if you are in a position to do this, 
and we want you to do it." But they told us very honestly what 
they wanted to do and why. Allen Ferguson was in favor of 
maintaining our company with the Rainier shareholders. But 
unfortunately, we had twenty-five percent interest in the company, 
and if Molson sold their interest to us, we would be controlling 
the operation. 



Achieving Family Ownership 



Teiser: 
Mondavi: 



What happened, to make a long story short, I was able to sell 
my interest finally, in C. Mondavi & Sons, to my brother. 
(Unfortunately, we went to a court case on this thing.) With the 
proceeds of that, I bought out Molson. That gave us the control, 
and eventually we bought out the rest of the shareholders of 
Rainier at a little higher price than we paid Molson. That's how 
we were able to get complete control of our operation. 

But only because the Rainier people were gentlemen: they were 
men of their word. They said that I would control and run the 
operation. That's exactly what happened. They had faith in what 
I was doing. They also held on as long as they could before they 
would sell it to someone else. Other people wanted to buy us out, 
but they wanted to give us a chance to buy it out. So really, I 
was very, very fortunate. 

So that's how we became complete owners of the Robert Mondavi 
Winery. 

Now family-owned? 

It's all one hundred percent family owned. Not only that, we 
bought over the vineyards that Rainier had. We have some of the 
prime land of Napa Valley. We were very, very fortunate. 



Teiser: How much acreage do you own now? 



47 



Mondavi: We have a little over fifteen hundred acres of land in Napa 

Valley, of which eleven hundred acres are in vineyards. We have 
some seven hundred acres of vineyard which is contiguous to the 
winery, which is the largest single piece of vineyard contiguous 
to a winery in Napa Valley. Then we have about 525 acres on the 
Oak Knoll, on the Silverado Trail, of which four hundred acres of 
that is in vineyard. 

Teiser: You buy additional 

Mondavi: This last year close to forty percent of our crush was our own 

grapes. And then the balance of the sixty percent we bought from 
growers that we have picked up over the years. We've picked up 
what we consider the finest growers. 

Little by little, we've been weeding out those growers which 
do not have quite the quality that we want, and little by little 
we've been really very fortunate. We are getting the prime 
growers in the area for the different varieties' of grapes, whether 
it's Cabernet, Chardonnay, Pinot noir, or Sauvignon blanc. We go 
to those locations that we, over the years, know are the best. 

We've actually crushed more grapes from all around Napa 
Valley than any other winery*. Ever since I've been in the 
business, since 1937, we've crushed in the Calistoga region, we've 
crushed in the Pope Valley, Conn Valley. We've crushed down in 
the Carneros. So we know the merits of these various areas. And 
we've been fortunate to be able to select either land that we 
bought or growers that were in that location to give us what we 
consider the kind of grapes and the finest grapes that we can have 
to produce the style of wine that we want. So we have been very 
fortunate. 

We've been working a lifetime at this, wanting to excel. 

We do a lot of dedicated work. There's no one in the world 
that does more research work for fine wines than we ourselves. We 
have three people who work full time just research work, plus 
another equivalent of two people in the cellar. So we have a 
combination of at least five to six people working constantly on 
just research work to improve the quality of our wines. 

Teiser: I know your son Tim has conducted barrel studies. 

Mondavi: Many. We've been doing that for years. In' fact, we started that 
here. They weren't doing it in France. Now Demptos, the barrel 
producer that we bought our barrels from, went to the University 
of Bordeaux, not once but several times, and finally said, "You 
know, the Mondavis are doing all this research work. Why don't 
you do something like this?" Now they are even working on 



*i.e., any other winery selling exclusively Napa Valley wine. 



48 



Teiser : 



research work in barrels in France, realizing that it's a very 
important factor of making wine. It's another ingredient. 

They did a tremendous amount of work at Davis. But we did 
the work even before. We started a lot of work very early. But 
then Davis did a lot of work thereafter, and very good work. You 
know, they've always under-estimated what Davis has done. The 
University of California at Davis has done more for making fine 
wine than any other enology school for the simple reason, being a 
young country, they looked into the climatic condition, the soil 
condition, the grape varieties, and they tried to match these more 
so than any other country. And here was a young country growing 
up, so we were able to select the areas where to plant our grapes. 
And also they taught us winemaking, viticultural practices. 

You have that nowhere to that extent in any country in the 
world. Australia didn't do it to the extent that we did, because 
we had Prohibition that wiped everything out; then we had to start 
from scratch. Basically, we were able to pinpoint where we wanted 
our grapes. In France and those places, they began to plant the 
grapes, they used those grapes that eventually were the best. 
That's why they ended up in Bordeaux, say with Cabernet, Cabernet 
franc, and Merlot, those three varieties particularly. In 
Burgundy, the Pinot noirs, the Chardonnays. But we have carried 
that research work here and it's given us a basis for producing 
the kind of wine that we're doing today. 

Not only that, the people of Europe finally realized what was 
going on over here, and they have come over here. They have come 
to the University of California at Davis, mainly at Davis. But 
they are doing that in order to keep up with what we're doing 
here. 

And of course, the American people play an important part 
because now they're beginning to drink wines. We have a long ways 
to go yet, but slowly it's becoming a way of life with certain 
groups, maybe twenty percent of the public. I say in the next 
generation you'll find many more wine drinkers, once we do an 
intelligent job of educating our people. It's part of the 
gracious way of living, that and food. And that's what's 
developing in our country. Wine and food are developing, and they 
go hand in hand and it's part of the gracious way of life. In the 
next generation, the United States of America will be the shining 
light on wine and food throughout the world. 

In the progress of this winery, who have been the key people 
besides yourself? 



Mondavi: Well, naturally, my son, Michael, and Tim who's come into this, 
and Marcie who came in later selling for us. 



49 



Teiser: She handles sales? 



Mondavi: She represents us in New York, yes. And then, of course, we had 

Brad Warner, who came in and became an assistant winemaker, and in 
charge of our cellar. The man was very, very effective. We have 
a wonderful man in our sales, Gary Ramona. He has been a very 
important factor in our business because he feels and breathes what 
we're doing. We have Cliff [Clifford S.] Adams, our attorney, who 
worked with us to help create our company and is very important in 
our operation. He's a member of our board of directors. In 
regard to winemaking, my son Tim has developed wonderful people. 

We had Zelma Long who used to work with us for years, nine 
years I think. Then she went to work at Simi, because she always 
wanted to be a head winemaker. I said, "Zelma, I'm sorry, Tim is 
going to be our winemaker." And she said, "I aspire to that." I 
said, "Fine, if you can ever find anything like that, we'll be 
happy to work with you." And she did. 

We had Mike [Miljenko] Grgich that used to work with us for 
about three, three and a half years. In fact I gave him a leave 
of absence when somepeople wanted him to become a partner. I 
said, "Mike, for Pete's sake, be careful, and I'll be happy to 
talk with you if there's any advice you want me to give you. Once 
again, he wanted to become an owner, and I said, "As you know, 
we're a family operation, and we're not going to sell any of our 
interest here." So I gave him a month's leave of absence. 

And after two weeks he came to me. He said, "Bob, you know 
these people would like to give me this percentage of interest in 
the company for being the winemaker. They want me to go ahead." 
I said, "Don't you do a thing until you have everything signed on 
the paper, and you have it clean-cut and that you get your 
percentage and that you get a written agreement; otherwise forget 
it." Thank God, he did that.* I've consulted with him several 
times since he left. 

We have all the confidence in the world in doing what we 
want, but we want people who are a hundred percent dedicated with 
us. If they aspire to do something else, we'll help them. We'll 
be very glad to help them. But we want people who are with us 
that feel what we're doing is what they want to do. And if they 
ever want to do something more that we cannot offer them, we'll 



*He became a partner in Chateau Montelena Winery and later in the 
Grgich Hills Cellar. 



50 



help them attain what they want. They are competition, but 
there's more than enough room for all of us. That's the way I 
think about it. 

Teiser: Those two are notable people, of course, whom you've just 
mentioned. 

Mondavi: There are others here that are working in here now. 



Promoting and Improving the Wines 



My wife Margrit had done and is doing a tremendous job in 
public relations. She was the one that developed "the Great Chefs 
of France" program. She's the one that came out with the jazz 
festivals and the art shows. She's the one that developed that. 
She was the one that really took charge of the tours and developed 
special events. She was a tour guide in the beginning, but then 
she became in charge of that, and that did much to build our 
business because of the graciousness with which we met people. We 
were very open, honest, and sincere. She trained all of our tour 
guides in the beginning. So she played and is playing a very 
important part. 



Teiser: You explained earlier how the tastings at Charles Krug served to 

publicize your wines and increase sales. Have these programs that 
you have just been discussing done the same here? 

Mondavi: Yes, in other words, what we did at Charles Krug, the same thing 
was true here. I realized that the quality of wines we had, that 
by making these wines, I felt that we had an obligation to the 
community and to ourselves to have functions that would be 
beneficial to the community, and at the same time would help 
publicize our wines and expose our wies by having people taste 
them. 

I also realized that "the Great Chefs of France" I knew that 
the wines that we were making were much better than most people 
realized, and they would be eventually acknowledged. And if I 
could get the great chefs of France to acknowledge that, this 
would be the best promotional program you could have because 
people from all over the world go to these three-star chefs. 
There were only at that time eighteen three-star chefs. And we 
brought over seven or eight of these. If you can get them sold on 



51 



Teiser: 



Mondavi: 



what you're doing, I can assure you, they carry your name 
overseas. 

I also realized it would take a while. In the fifth year 
these chefs began to order wine from us. So you see we made a lot 
of progress. In the beginning, they didn't feel that California 
could produce wines that belonged in the company of French wines. 
Our wines, in the beginning, weren't as well made as they are 
today. But we've learned a lot in that period of time, to the 
point where they are now ordering wines. And not only that, they 
speak of our wines with great respect, whereas before, they never 
realized we had such quality. 

People do not realize that if you can get a person like Paul 
Bocuse, or Roger Bergier, or Michel Gerard, or people of that 
caliber to speak well about your wines, California wine, this is a 
big step forward. You see this makes a big difference. Now, it 
will take maybe a generation before that is accepted, but the fact 
that we can make that quality, I know that in time the world at 
large will realize that we can produce wines belonging in the 
company of the finest wines of the world. 

I don't say our wine is better, I don't say it's worse. It 
has its own style. And it's going to be just as much appreciated 
by the world at large, if not more so, because our climatic 
conditions are even better than the French and the German. 

Since you established this winery, these have been the years of 
the increased interest in white wines. 

Very definitely, yes. If I can give you a little background on 
this Right after repeal, up to the mid-sixties, our wines of 
California were rather poor. They were not well made. But in the 
mid-sixties we began to make much better wines. But before that 
time, the wines were big, rich, especially our red wines, heavy in 
tannin, and very dark color. That's not an easy drinking wine. 
So the American people began to drink wines, but they drank white 
wines because they were lighter, easy to drink, and much more 
palatable. And this is what created the boom in the white wines, 
only because it was more palatable and easier to drink. 

We are now learning to make our red wines that are much more 
palatable. If you taste our wines today compared to what they 
were fifteen years ago, or twenty years ago, you'll find the 
reason why they didn't drink red wines. But as we learn 

Another thing that we did, we thought that everything had to 
be completely natural, we didn't learn to work our wines. We 
didn't learn to sculpture our wines. We didn't learn to, I mean, 
clarify properly. We felt that that was taking something away. 
What we are doing now, we realize our wines can be natural, but 



52 



they can be clarified, they can be honed, they can be sculpted. 
In other words, we're taking a beautiful piece of marble, and 
we're working it. That's what's happening now. 

We're understanding that we can pick our grapes much lower in 
sugar, much lower in alcohol, and yet have a more exciting wine, a 
wine that will go with your food better than that big heavy wine. 
We are making both our white and red wines more palatable. 

Teiser: What other variables are there besides the time of harvest? 

Mondavi: Where the grapes are grown, the climatic conditions, and the soil 
itself play important parts. All of these. Certain varieties 
like Pinot noir and Chardonnay want the cooler climate, and yet 
one that can bring that grape to full maturity, like the Carneros. 
The Cabernet needs a little warmer climate, such as we have here 
in Oakville. But then even here we have microclimates, and we 
have soil differentials. We are beginning to take all of that 
into consideration. 

Then there is another factor: the productivity of our vines. 
If they're too productive, they dilute the grape itself. So 
therefore you have to thin your grapes so that instead of getting 
five or six tons per acre, you'll get maybe three tons per acre: 
you'll find that the quality is much better. We are doing a 
better job of cloning. But that will take twenty years for us to 
reflect that. But you see we're doing a lot of work along that 
line. 

Teiser: What about in the winery? 

Mondavi: In the winery, the same thing is true. What percentage of barrels 
that you have are new barrels? What are old barrels? How do you 
treat those barrels? This plays a tremendous part in that. The 
equipment, the facilities that you have to keep your fermentation 
controlled. That's very, very important. The presses that you 
have. Before, we used to have the coq presses or the screw 
presses. Now we have the presses with the pneumatic bags in them, 
which are very gentle, and we are realizing that plays a very 
important part because of the extraction of tannins from the skins 
and things like that. 

So all of these are things that we are learning. The more we 
go into detail, the more we begin to understand. Remember there's 
over four hundred different elements in grapes and wines. Each 
and every year is a different year. If you- understand that, 
you'll be able to make your wines better, and pick your grapes at 
the right time, and sculpture your wine. 

But there are so many variables. It's like a child. You 
think, look at all the different genes you have in children. 



53 



They're all different, each and every one; even though they are 
under the same roof and brought up under the same conditions, they 
vary completely. And the same thing with wines. You have to be 
totally dedicated. And you have to put a lifetime of work to this 
thing if you want to really understand it. 

Really, we want to make wines naturally, but we're under 
standing that there are certain imperfections even in Mother 
Nature. You can freeze to death, or you can die by heat 
prostration. Mother Nature can be pretty rough on you. 
Therefore, everything that Mother Nature does isn't necessarily 
that good. So you have to find out what it is that Mother Nature 
does that is good, and then what can we do to improve it. This is 
what we're doing. We're beginning to learn that. 

Teiser: In addition to the various techniques of processing, do you do 
much blending? 

Mondavi: We have experimented with blending, yes. Take, for instance, the 
Cabernet [Sauvignon]. We'll use Cabernet [Sauvignon], Cabernet 
franc, and Merlot; we found that these differences do play an 
important part. We find that Cabernet [Sauvignon] from one area 
versus another is completely different, and we are picking these 
out and we're selecting the more elegant, the finer ones to go 
into our higher priced wines. We are learning those differences. 

Teiser: You are not dedicated to a hundred percent varietal wines? 

Mondavi: No. For Robert Mondavi wines? Pinot noir is a hundred percent. 
Chardonnay is a hundred percent, because we can't improve it by 
adding other things. We haven't found anything for Pinot Noir 
that adds to the elegance, the velvetiness of Pinot Noir. 
Cabernet Sauvignon we find that we can use Cabernet franc or 
Merlot; that adds to it. We find that Sauvignon Blanc, the 
aggressive character can be softened with a little of the 
Seinillon. So we like a little Semillon in the Sauvignon Blanc. 
It depends upon on the grape variety. We used Camay a hundred 
percent, when we had it. But now we're phasing out Camay. We're 
phasing out Zinfandel. 

Teiser: Why? 

Mondavi: The reason is because the American public will not pay enough 

money for those wines to allow us to pay the growers enough money 
to keep their grapes in vineyard. We have encouraged our growers 
to plant other varieties such as Cabernet, Chardonnay, and Pinot 
noir. Those varieties that the growers can get more money from 
per acre of land. If we didn't do that, we would not be able to 
pay them enough money to keep them happy. That's why we recommend 
to our growers to plant Cabernet, Pinot noir, Chardonnay, 
Sauvignon blanc, Riesling, in the proper location. That's what 



54 



Teiser: 
Mondavi: 
Teiser: 
Mondavi: 

Teiser: 
Mondavi: 



Teiser: 
Mondavi: 



we've done. 

We used to have over twenty percent of all our production in 
rose, and then we had another seven to eight percent, or maybe 
nine percent, Camay, red wine. That used to be over twenty-five 
percent of our business. 

You're eliminating rosfe too? 

We're eliminating it, yes. We're practically out of it now. 

It became less popular as time went on? 

They still sell a lot of rose. I think there's a lot of rose 
sold, fifteen to twenty percent is rosfe now. Still a good share 
is rose, but not as popular as it used to be. 

Robrt Mondavi wines came to public attention rather suddenly in 
the seventies, didn't they? 

We produced in '66. In '67 we came on the market with rose and 
Camay and some of the whites, Chenin blanc and Fumfe blanc. But in 
'69, we came out with Cabernet, Pinot noir, Zinfandel, and 
Chardonnay. We had those varieties then, all of them, but they 
didn't get known until the seventies. 

Were there any pivotal events in their becoming known? 

The only way it came You see, I happened to know the better 
restaurants of San Francisco, especially Ernie's, Doro's, those 
top people there, and I was able to get acceptance and support. 
They were willing to handle the wines, to recommend them, but not 
to push them other than to try them. I was very lucky, because 
once they did try them, people began to repeat. That took a 
little while. It began to gather momentum. The first year, we 
sold fifteen hundred cases of wine, the second year, thirty-five 
hundred, then we began to increase much more rapidly. 



Distribution. Sales, and Employees 



Teiser: What is your distribution system? 

Mondavi: We believe in being our own primary distributor. See, in the fine 
wine business you'll have what I call the winery that produces 
the wine, and a primary distributor. That is the man that will 
call on the wholesale houses, but also assist the wholesale house 



55 



by calling on retailers, restaurateurs, and hotels. Well, we do 
the function of the primary distributor. Usually they get about 
twenty percent. If your price of wine, we'll say, is fifty 
dollars a case, they get twenty percent to promote and sell it. 
We'll say ten dollars. Then the wholesaler usually worked on a 
thirty-three-and-a-third percent markup. Then the retailer worked 
on a fifty-percent maximum. 

However, that has changed now since fair trade is out. If 
you used to sell a wine fifty dollars a case, usually by the 
normal markup, thirty-three and a third percent, and fifty-percent 
markup, the wine was double on the market. Now, it doesn't do 
that because the competition is so keen. Fair trade isn't there. 
If you're wine is fifty dollars a case, it will range from seventy- 
five dollars to a hundred dollars depending upon the demand and 
competition for that particular item. 

We took that primary distributor's function; we call on the 
wholesaler, but also assist the wholesaler in his selling. 

Teiser: That requires a big sales force. 

Mondavi: Well, we have over forty people in our sales force.* 

Teiser: And a family member on the East Coast. 

Mondavi: That's right. We have quite a few people in the East. We have 

people all over, the East, the South. We have them in Florida, we 
have them in New York, we have them in the Midwest, all over the 
country. [To assistant] Could you find out how many salesmen we 
have? 

[interruption] 
Teiser: Your distribution is very effective then, isn't it? 

Mondavi: It's been very effective, but it's only effective if the people 

know what you know and you can transmit what you have in the wine 
that is different. Otherwise it becomes a common denominator. 
The secret of this business is getting people totally involved, 
totally dedicated, who believe in you. You have to teach them, 
and you have to taste with them. The reason we have these 
tastings is because we wanted them to feel that it's a live thing; 
it's not just selling boxes. 



*See p. 57 



56 



Teiser: Do you and your sons taste with your salesmen? 
Mondavi: Oh, yes. 

My son Tim [himself] tastes every day from nine o'clock to 
five o'clock or later. We have a hard time getting him to come to 
meetings. Constantly. 

We have a tasting once a week on Mondays at eleven o'clock. 
We compare our wines with finest imports, the finest California 
wines. And we bring in the top people of our organization here. 
We have about fifteen, twenty people that are sampling these 
wines. We have our key sales staff, we have our key adminis 
trative staff, key people in the vineyards. 

We want everyone to know what part they play in wine, and to 
know the difference between wines, and why we can ask more money 
for our wines, and how our wines rank with the finest wines in the 
world. We expect them to be in the tops of the top wines. We 
have that confidence. We don't say it's always the tops, but it's 
there more often than any of our competition. And we want our 
people to know this. And they are part of it. We have to get our 
growers involved. We have our growers come in from time to time 
to taste what their wines are like and how they compare with all 
the rest. And that's why there is this great interest. We are 
totally involved, totally dedicated. This is important. 

Teiser: To go back to something else you said, it's interesting that you 
could have people this dedicated when they knew that they are not 
going to have a proprietory interest themselves, when they know 
it's a family company and they can't go up to the top. 

Mondavi: I know, but you'd be amazed. There are many people that don't 

want to do this. I have had a secretary here. I wanted to make 
her an administrative assistant to me. Not interested. I wanted 
to take her to Europe, that is with a group; we're taking 
eighteen. "Why should I go? I'm not interested in that." Can 
you believe this? And we would pay for the whole thing. But 
she's not interested. You see, there are certain people who are 
interested in going only so far. 

But we are interested in having people who want to excel in 
whatever function they're doing. And there are many people who do 
not want to go beyond certain responsibility, they do not want 
that responsibility. Now it's up to us to find those people. If 
we tried to get all executives, pretty soon we'd have nobody doing 
our work for us. But there are enough people, as long as they are 
paid well and have a good challenge, who want to excel. We pay 
all of our people from ten to fifteen percent more than our 
competition because we want them to know they are being rewarded. 



57 



We want them to be interested in what we're doing. We want them 
to taste. 

And I can assure you that if our people in the cellar thought 
we were trying to save money and not excel they would be up in 
arms, because many of these people that are working here have the 
pride of working for us to achieve the best. If they thought we 
were doing that, they would really let me know. All of our people 
realize we stop at nothing to excel, and that's why they're happy 
to work with us. 

Teiser: You need good management. 
Mondavi: That's right. 

[Interruption. Assistant returns with figures.] 

Mondavi: Forty-six employees, sales. We have twenty-eight sales reps, who 
are people that really call on the trade, but beyond that we have 
sales office people. We have three people in our sales office in 
Los Angeles. We have another fifteen in sales, people that work 
with our sales staff here to feed these other people. So we have 
another fifteen there. Then we have, like my daughter, who works 
in New York. We have directly on the road twenty-eight. Our 
other people who are top echelon, they are not included right 
here. [pause] That gives you a rough idea. 

Teiser: It would be interesting to compare the ratio of sales people to 
gallons that you have and the ratio of sales people to gallons 
that Gallo has, for instance. 

Mondavi: That would be interesting. I wish I knew those figures. 

One thing I want to talk to you about is my philosophy 
dealing with my employees. I realized that overseas too few had 
too much. I realized in our country if we want to keep our 
individual enterprise, our democracy and free enterprise system in 
this country, we'd have to learn to share with our employees; so 
I've always wanted to be able to share with our employees, work 
with them. Every one of our employees today receives from ten to 
twenty percent more than our competition only because I want to be 
able to continue our way of life. The individual is more 
important than being a number, and he produces more and better. I 
feel that if we don't do this, this way of life is going to be 
lost, because right now in even France, Spain, Portugal, and of 
course Russia, really socialism or communism has come in to take 
over. We have to learn to share otherwise we're going to lose 
this individual, enterprising system of ours, call it what you 
want, but we have to learn to share better than we have in the 
past. 



58 



Teiser: How does that work in with the fact that this is a family company 
and employees can't expect to become part of ownership? 

Mondavi: What we do, for those people who have the ability, we have a unit 
system that they share with us in our profits. Now, our top 
people get units and the other people get a percentage of the 
profits as they go along. We give them the maximum of what we're 
allowed by the government when we make our profit. We share with 
all of our people, not only on giving them a salary from ten to 
fifteen percent more than our competition, but also on the 
profits. Five of the top people will be divided on units that we 
will give them, which will give a certain percentage. Our whole 
idea is to get approximately ten percent of our profit to share 
with our people. 

We feel we have to work through these people, and that they 
are part of the company. This is what we do to try to let them 
know we're trying to preserve the family operation to be the unit 
that will carry on, but we know that they are entitled to some of 
the profits. If not, they lose interest. 



Buying the Oakville Label and Inventory 



Teiser: b, 1977 you bought something from the Oakville Winery 

Mondavi: Oh, the Oakville Winery across the road. That was interesting. 

We bought the Oakville label plus their inventory. That's another 
phase. We started here in 1966, and then the Rainier people came 
in here a little before 1970. We didn't have enough grapes, and 
there weren't enough grapes in the Napa valley that we could get. 
We made a deal with Bud [Wilfred E.j Van Loben Sels of the 
Oakville Winery where he had three or four hundred acres of grapes 
that he couldn't use because he was just starting, and we had a 
sales force. So we made a deal with him whereby over a period of, 
I think, five years, four years, that we would buy the excess 
grapes that he had. We would make wine for him. And he could 
sell it at his Oakville Winery for the grapes that we'd have in 
exchange, as our grapes were growing. 

At that time we were partners with Rainier, and Rainier was 
buying land and planting grapes, and we needed five years to do 
this. So we made an exchange. While you're growing up, we'll 
take more grapes in the beginning and less later, and we'll make 
wine for you to allow you to get into business. 



59 



This is what we did. (But later they did get a good 
winemaker.) We made wine for them and bottled it for them. They 
delivered grapes to us, and then less each year as our grapes came 
into bearing. And so we helped one another. That worked out very 
well for us. Therefore we were able to have the grapes that we 
wanted, grown in some very good regions, because they had some 
very good grapes. 

Then what happened, unfortunately, they had to sell out. 
Financially, the business didn't work out well. So we bought the 
label and we bought the inventory, but not the winery or the 
vineyards. The vineyards and winery were bought by Inglenook. We 
bought the inventory of wines that they had on hand at that time. 
We have the Oakville label to do what we want with. And we never 
came out with it because I didn't want to have too many different 
lines. I'd rather concentrate on our own and do a job of that. 
We are always able to come out with another line if we want to. 

Teiser: Now you don't have another. 

Mondavi: No. What we do have is Robert Mondavi varietals here in Napa 
Valley. And then we have the vintage red, vintage white and 
vintage rosb But we do own the Oakville label, and we could come 
out with it. But I don't want to, yet. We don't know what we'll 
do in the future. 



Really we've been very fortunate, 
all of our wines. 



We've been able to sell 



Adding the Winery in Woodbridge## 
[Interview 3: April 20, 1984] 



Teiser: You bought what was originally the Cherokee winery* at Woodbridge 
in 1978? 

Mondavi: The Cherokee winery and then later it became the Montcalm 

winery**. We at first used it for storage. What happened was 
that my brother used it there for a period of time as storage, 
that is the C. Mondavi & Sons. They were not interested in the 
winery. So when we settled our deal with my brother, I accepted 
some wine that was made at the C. Mondavi & Sons, at the Charles 
Krug winery, and that was stored at the Montcalm winery. 

My brother was not interested in the winery, so I leased the 
winery, took the winery over for a period of time. And my brother 



*Cherokee Vineyard Association 
**Montcalm Vintners 



60 



bought this inventory at a predetermined value. As he took the 
inventory, he was able to pay off part of my share in C. Mondavi & 
Sons. 

We then decided to buy the winery. We felt it would fit in 
with our program to produce what at that time we called our red, 
white, and rose table wine. As we were growing in Napa Valley, we 
were producing both the Robert Mondavi varietal wines and after 
some eight years we began to come out with what we called table 
wines. And we were able to produce both of them at our winery in 
Napa Valley. But then as we grew, we needed more facilities. So 
that's when we leased the former Cherokee winery, and then we 
realized that we wanted to buy it because we were growing. We 
negotiated a deal with the Wells Fargo Bank where we bought that 
winery to undertake what we called our red, white, and rose table 
wine. Eventually we changed the name to what we call now our 
vintage red, vintage white, vintage rosk 

Teiser: The last users had been the Felices? 

Mondavi: Yes, they were the Felices. 

Teiser: I remember they had put in a lot of new equipment. 

Mondavi: They put a lot of new equipment. They put in some of the finest 
stainless steel fermenters and some of the finest fermenting 
equipment, stainless steel tanks. They did a very fine job. They 
spent a lot of money, anticipating things would go well. But then 
in 1973 things turned around and became very difficult, and 
unfortunately they lost the winery. That's when the property was 
leased by C. Mondavi & Sons. Then in turn, when we were going to 
settle my deal with my brother, we took it over and put the 
inventory there, which was my share of the settlement with my 
brother. We sold that inventory to my brother, and we were paid 
that way. 

Teiser: Do you still have that equipment? 

Mondavi: We have all that equipment. Not only that, but we spent a lot of 
money in improving that equipment, and making it a very fine 
winery. At the present time, it's a very fine winery for producing 
our vintage red, vintage white, and vintage rose. 

Teiser: Where do you get the grapes for those? 

Mondavi: Well, we get them mainly from the northern San Joaquin, around the 
Lodi area, the Sacramento area. That's about maybe two-thirds of 
it. One third or forty percent comes from the north coast as well 
as the south coastal region. We ship a lot of grapes from Napa, 
Sonoma, or Monterey. 




Robert Mondavi at the interview of April 20, 1984 

Photograph by Ruth Teiser 



61 



We always wanted to locate in the Lodi region, because we 
knew, for table wines, that region in my mind was the finest that 
you could have, where you could produce good grapes at a 
reasonable price and get good volume, and yet have style and 
character in your wines. That's why I wanted to locate in the 
Lodi region because I was able to get grapes from the northern and 
southern coastal areas where it was somewhat cooler for the table 
wine purposes, and at the same time we could bring in from Napa, 
Sonoma and other regions. But predominately, we wanted the 
majority to come from that northern San Joaquin, so that we could 
be able to produce the wine at a more reasonable price, that had 
style and character. And that is developing and showing to be the 
case at the present time. 

Teiser: Do you do all your crushing there? 

Mondavi: We do all the crushing for our vintage red, vintage white, and 

rose- In fact, we delivered last year, I think it was, of our own 
grapes from Napa, about one thousand three or four hundred tons of 
grapes, that we put into the Robert Mondavi varietal program. 

Teiser: You don't have any acreage over near the winery there? 

Mondavi: We have about one hundred acres of grapes around the winery, but 
this was bought for possible winery expansion in the future. We 
feel that we should have; in principle, I would like to have at 
least a third to forty percent of our own grapes. But that's a 
long-range program. Like we have approximately thirty-five to 
forty percent of our own grapes in the Napa Valley region. 

Teiser: The grapes you buy from Monterey County, are those for the white 
wine? 

Mondavi: Mainly the whites; very few reds because they have too much of 
tnat herbacious character. 

Teiser: What part of the Salinas Valley do they come from? 

Mondavi: We go all over, where we can get good lots, depending upon, more 
in the higher elevations, actually. We go all the way down to 
Santa Barbara to get certain grapes. They have a surplus of 
grapes that we can get at a reasonable price. And certain of 
those regions are very good. 

Teiser: You have high volume then for your vintage red, white and rose? 

Mondavi: Yes, we do. We move 1,400,000 cases a year of those. It's a 
sizable quantity. 

Teiser: You were speaking earlier of your "overhead nut." Am I quoting 
you correctly? 



62 



Mondavi: My overhead nut when we were doing business at the C. Mondavi & 

Sons, and we were struggling to make money, and we were struggling 
to be able to get enough volume to take care of the family. 

Teiser: Is this volume production of yours in the Lodi area similar to 
that overhead nut that you were speaking of? 

Mondavi: Actually, it's much easier for us to be able to operate more 

profitably in the Lodi region because the amount of money required 
for our fixed assets, our tanks and our crushing equipment, is 
much less than what it is in the Napa Valley and the grapes are 
much lower in price. If we want to get a stainless steel tank 
that is a hundred thousand gallons in capacity, we have to buy 
many, many barrels of fifty or sixty gallon capacity to do that. 
Barrels we use in Napa Valley cost ten times more per gallon than 
a stainless steel barrel. And the amount of labor involved in our 
operation in the Napa Valley is many times greater than it is in 
the Woodbridge area. So therefore, the cost for building a winery 
is much greater in the Napa Valley region. Therefore our cost and 
our overhead to produce a gallon of wine in the Lodi region or in 
our Woodbridge cellar there is much much less. 

Teiser: Are you using oak there at all? 

Mondavi: Yes, we wanted to be distinctive. We decided that we would be 

able to use American oak which is about one third the price of the 
oak that we're using in Napa Valley, plus the fact that we also 
can use barrels that we've used in Napa Valley and transfer them 
over to Woodbridge. We scrape them out, we re-fire them, and we 
find that they work out very well. That way we can get a 
character in our wines that other people cannot afford. In fact, 
we realize that in order to be successful in this business, you 
not only have to make a good wine, but you have to make a 
distinctive wine. 

We realized that there was no one that was willing to go 
through the time and effort to put the more popularly priced wine 
in barrels and age it to get that extra dimension, that extra 
character. And yet I knew that if we knew how to handle the 
barrels efficiently and effectively, and were able to get that 
style, that little difference would make a big difference in the 
long run, if we consistently did this. 

That's exactly what we decided to do. We knew that it would 
make us unique. We knew it would take ten 'years before the people 
would recognize it. But we had the patience. This is insuring us 
of the future for the simple reason other people will not invest the 
money or the time, or are not willing to take or really appreciate 
the subtle difference that we have. I knew that we could ask for 
more money, and that we would make more profit by doing it if we 



63 



had the patience, and if we had the knowledge and know-how to do 
it. And it's been working that way. I've been very pleased about 
it. 

Teiser: Is there someone in your family directly in charge of that? 

Mondavi: My son Tim is in complete charge of all our winemaking. He goes 

every week to the winery on Woodbridge Road. They taste with him. 
We have an interchange between the two wineries that is 
tremendous. In other words, they are working like one team. 

Teiser: He does the blending there? 

Mondavi: Oh, he does the whole thing, but tastings take place at both 
wineries. It's worked under his complete supervision. 

Teiser: Aren't you lucky to have two good sons! 

Mondavi: That's right. I'm very fortunate. Not only that what I'm happy 
about, they realize the challenge. And they realize that they're 
just getting started, that this thing will grow and become much 
more exciting and interesting. What we've done in the past 
fifteen years can be much greater in the next ten years, as far as 
quality, as far as achieving a goal and being unique in the 
industry. 



Architecture of the Robert Mondavi Winery 



Teiser: I wanted to ask more about the Robrt Mondavi Winery. We didn't 
discuss the architecture. It's architecture is so distinctive. 

Mondavi: I remember when I was a member of the board of directors of the 
Wine Institute, the owners of Sunset magazine, Bill Lane and his 
brother Mel, invited the directors of the Wine Institute to the 
Sunset House in Menlo Park when it was first built. I just 
marveled at that building and how beautiful it was, how intimate. 
It had a warm feeling to it. I never had any idea that I was 
going to build another winery, but I said to myself, "If I ever 
built a winery, this is what I would like to have, something like 
this." Even though it's small in that regard, and beautiful, I 
felt it could be adapted as a winery. 

Sure enough, when the time came to the fact we were going to 
build a winery, I immediately called Bill Lane because I began to 
know him very well. He would invite the directors once a year to 
go over to Sunset House, which I enjoyed. The longer I stayed 



64 



Teiser : 
Mondavi : 



there, the better I liked it. I called Bill Lane on the telephone 
and told him that I was interested in building a winery, a small 
but a very fine winery. I wanted to know if he could give me the 
name of the architect. He said, "Well, Bob, he's not an 
architect, he's a designer. He's a good friend of mine. I'll be 
happy to call him." 

He gave me the name, the address. He called Cliff May and he 
left word there. Bill tells me the story that Cliff May called 
him at two o'clock in the morning when he got back from what he 
was doing and got him out of bed. Then he told him about our 
interest. I went down there to see Cliff May with Fred Holmes at 
that time. 

Cliff May was always saying, "Well, Bob, how big of a winery 
do you want to build in the final analysis?" I didn't want to 
answer the question because I knew his fees would be very, very 
expensive. Finally I told him, I said, "Cliff, listen. If I told 
you how big it was going to be, all the money that we would have 
would be going for your fees and we wouldn't have enough left for 
the winery." And he said, "I'll make a deal with you. I'll 
design, and you'll only pay for that portion that you build. 
Let's design for what you think you will build in the future. But 
you only pay me for what will be built." I said, "Well, fine." 

So that's the agreement I had with Cliff May. He designed 
that arch. I told him at that time I was interested in a winery 
where we could have cultural events, like plays or symphonies and 
things such as that, and I'd like to have an accomodation for at 
least five hundred to a thousand people. Then I told him that I 
would like to have tours through the winery. But I want something 
that has aesthetic value. I said I was very impressed by what he 
did at Sunset House. 

He went ahead and made a design, just a real quick sketch. 
It didn't take long because I told him we had to do this fast. 
This was in February when we saw him. So he made a sketch in a 
couple of days with the arch. In one wing was the winery, and the 
left wing the public relations wing. I saw that and I said, "This 
is it." My partners did too. In this way were able to get the 
aesthetic value as well as being a very functional winery. 

What did you start with? Did you just start with one wing or did 
you build faster than you anticipated? 

We started with the arch, and then we had the retail room on the 
left-hand side as you go in. And then we had a couple of tasting 
rooms. In fact, I said to him, "You know, when I went to France, 
the one place that impressed me tremendously was Moe't et Chandon." 
What they did, they had not one room, they had about a half a 
dozen rooms where they would have special tasting parties. And 



65 



then they had a big room where they had larger groups. I said, 
"We want to make this a very personalized business, and I would 
like to have a few rooms for tasting." In fact we have about 
three different tasting rooms, and then we have a large center 
room. 

So he built that that way and then he built the winery wing. 
I told him I was not interested in having bigger groups than about 
twenty-five to thirty people at the most so that we can have a 
personal contact with the people. So he started with that arch. 
We liked it very much. When we did that, people were wondering 
what we were doing, because they couldn't quite understand that. 
Here was this crazy Bob Mondavi building something here. 

When my partners sold out and when Rainier came in, we then 
expanded the operation from a fifteen-thousand case winery to one 
that was a quarter of a million cases. Then we built our big 
vineyard room, and people could not understand what we were doing 
with that vineyard room. However, the Rainier people had the 
vision and understanding of what we wanted to do and went with us. 
And we had tours. The first year we lost money taking tours. But 
the second year we had enough tourism and sold enough wine so that 
it began to pay. And then we began to have functions in the 
Vineyard Room. We would have luncheons. 

Teiser: How many people does it hold? 

Mondavi: It will hold up to 250 for a dinner, 250 to three hundred people. 
We had a caterer come in. We selected a very outstanding caterer. 
I made an agreement with him. We tried quite a few different 
caterers the first several years. But we realized we wanted to 
have someone that had the style that was unique and different. 

So we made a deal with Andre Mercier, who is still with us, 
because he actually did the best job of catering, and he had the 
best cheeses. So we made a deal with him where he would just do 
that for us except for special parties. But he would not do that 
for other wineries unless he would talk with us. And we agreed 
that we would have nobody else but him. So we had a very good 
relationship. We wanted to have a distinctiveness of everything 
that we did at the winery, whether making wine, whether it would 
be having our luncheons or dinners. And we wanted to be able to 
approach it in a unique and different way. 

Teiser: How many people come to visit the winery tourists, not special 
guests? 

Mondavi: I would say there would be about 250,000 to 300,000. 

Teiser: A year. My! Do you more than make up for the expense of the 
tours by the wines you sell at the winery? 



66 



Mondavi: 



Teiser: 



Mondavi: 



Teiser: 

Mondavi: 
Teiser: 
Mondavi : 



Oh, yes. In fact that has been a profitable arrangement for us. 
I think it was after a year and a half or two years, less than two 
years, we began to more than pay for the people that we had taking 
tours. And it began to really pay for us. It's done us a lot of 
good. I believe people that would come to taste wine at the 
winery would taste the wine, then they would go back and would 
then order our wines and speak about the wines. I felt in the 
long run it was a good thing. And it actually has turned out to 
be that way. 

One thing I did, though, I felt that we could be sincerely 
honest and tell the people, and give them an educational program 
on what we were doing that would be far better than talking about 
a lot of words that were meaningless. I found out that when I was 
touring Europe, no one knew anything about winemaking. They 
wouldn't talk about it. Then when I went to London, of all 
things, all the writers knew very little about the winemaking 
technique and didn't understand some of the techniques that really 
developed the style and character. I began to talk to them. And 
I began to realize if I could tell them something that was 
different, and be honest and show them the differences, why, maybe 
we could win them over. And that's exactly what we did. We felt 
the same thing with the American people. If we can be sincerely 
honest, telling them what we can do, I thought it was the best way 
of doing it. It's just so simple to be honest and sincere. And 
yet it's funny how people want to build something way beyond that. 

I took your tour with Patrick Grubb, whom I was showing around, 
but I don't remember whether that was specially arranged or not, 
so I don't know if I've had your routine tour. 

Our routine tour and any tour that we have is practically the same 
thing. We tell everybody everything. But if we have a winemaker 
that comes through and he wants to, and it's a personal friend, 
then we will go into more detail. But we tell everybody 
everything we do. We have no secrets. 

You run tours right through the winery so people can see the 
equipment and everything else? 

Naturally. 

And you don't mind people being underfoot a bit? 

We debated that. We were debating whether we should have tours 
that would be away from our employees, completely away. And yet 
at that time I thought that as long as we can make it efficient 
enough, and they could see without disturbing our help, that it 
would be better than trying to put them away and looking at it 
from a distance where they couldn't quite see. I didn't quite 



67 



believe in the elevated [platform] tours. We talked about that. 
And I still felt that we could do it where people could walk 
through and seem to be part of it and yet not affect the 
operations.* 



Export Markets and Domestic Markets 



Teiser: You've spoken of interaction with Europe. Do you export much 
wine? 

Mondavi: We don't export a lot of wine. We feel that it takes one 

generation to develop your business in our own country. It takes 
a second generation to be able to build it to export. We do 
believe in it, but we are realistic to realize it's an investment 
for the first ten or fifteen years. 

We are working on it. And we are travelling and do a lot of 
visiting. And we are beginning to open up our business throughout 
the world. We're selling in Japan. We're selling in Singapore, 
Hong Kong. We're going to various regions like that. We're 
selling in England, Ireland, Germany, Switzerland. Not Italy yet; 
in fact I'm going to be taking a trip there. There are people who 
have been interested, but I didn't want to get into it until I 
thought I could do it in the proper way. But we're selling in 
Denmark, Holland, those Benelux areas. 

Not great amounts, but realizing it takes time. We are not 
trying to push it heavily. But we realize that we have the 
quality. We also realize that the strong American dollar during 
the last two or three years has hurt us tremendously, and we've 
had to drop our normal mark-up. If we want to be in the export 
business, we realize that we're going to have to sacrifice making 
the normal profit when the American dollar is abnormally high, 
hoping to make it up in the future. We do realize that in time 
that will readjust itself, and then we will readjust our own 
profits accordingly. We have discussed this very openly with all 
of our distributors, and we all are working together along that 
line because they have a lot of faith in what we're doing. We 
have faith in what we can do long-rangewise in the export market. 



*For additional information about the tours, see pp. 96-102 



68 



Teiser: Do you have anticipations that the Orient will be a large market? 

Mondavi: It will take a generation before that develops to be a big market 
in my opinion. 

I think that it's the same thing that we had. It's not far 
different from our trying to sell wine in the eastern states or 
the Midwest. They are the toughest. It was easier for us to sell 
wine in London than it was in the eastern states, that is New 
York, Boston and that whole area there because they could buy 
wines very inexpensively which had the European name and sell it 
there. Whereas even though our quality was better, it seems that 
the name was much more important than the quality of the wine. We 
probably could sell wine in London easier than we could sell it in 
New York. In time that will change. 

However, what has happened, the American people are beginning 
to realize that the California wines are very good. And the 
Americans have been demanding and forcing the restaurateurs and 
the retailers to handle California wines even though their prices 
were higher than some of the foreign wines. This is how we are 
beginning to develop our wines on the eastern seaboard, only 
because the American people realize this. The American people 
want what is better and if it is better and they think it's 
better, they'll buy it. Just like the automobiles. If they think 
the Japanese cars are better, they'll let our automobile industry 
go down the tubes if we don't do something about it. The same 
thing is true with the wine business. But it takes time. 

Unfortunately the image of California wines is not as good on 
the East Coast and the Midwest as it should be. I blame our 
industry on it because we haven't educated the public as well as 
we should. Also unfortunately, the strong dollar has hurt us in 
that regard too. 



The Napa Valley Vintners and Its Early Members 

Teiser: You have been a member of the Napa Valley Vintners 

Mondavi: I have been a member of that right along, ever since it started. 



Teiser: You were saying that the idea initially of the vintners group was 



69 



Mondavi: Louis Martini was the one that started it. I came in the second 
meeting. It was the second meeting. The first one they had with 
John Daniel, Louis Stralla, and I guess that was it.* And then I 
was invited in the second meeting. At that time Louis Martini 
expressed the fact that this was only going to be an eating and 
drinking group. And we were going to enjoy each other. But at 
the same time, we were going to discuss general things of the wine 
business. 

And I can assure you it was a wonderful organization. We had 
a wonderful time, we had good food. We ate at the Miramonte 
Hotel, and they served very well. And we enjoyed the luncheons. 
It was very educational. We were able to work together and have a 
common understanding. 

We didn't do anything unless it was unanimous. That was one 
thing that in the beginning when we formed, whatever we do, it had 
to be unanimous. 

Teiser: What sort of thing did you do? 

Mondavi: We discussed general things, winemaking. We discussed business 
conditions, the market conditions over-all at that time. We did 
not discuss prices at that time, but did grapes, subjects like 
that. We discussed other things, how to promote Napa Valley 
wines, how do we get our wines across to the general public and 
how we could do better. Really just general issues like that. 

Teiser: Maybe you could say a few words about each of those men, Martini, 
Stralla, and John Daniel, just about them personally. 

Mondavi: I would say this, that these were three strong, different 

individuals. I knew Louis Martini. I met Louis Martini and John 
Daniel and Louis Stralla all at about the same time, because when 
I came in here in '37 I was introduced to them by Paul Alexander. 
And they were very closely knit. They always would meet with Paul 
Alexander at the St. Helena Hotel. We used to have lunch there. 
I met all of them there. 

John Daniel was a real leader in wanting to produce the 
finest wines possible. I have never met a man that was more 
sincere, more honest, that was really wanting to protect the 
industry and work for the good of the entire industry. He really 
had high principles in that regard. He was ultraconservative. If 
you'll look at the way he operated Inglenook Winery, very 
conservative, wanted it to be a jewel and would not upset that by 
even entertaining wine tastings and things like that if he thought 
it was really pushing too much. 

I differed with John in that regard. I said, "John, we are 
having these wine tastings to help promote and build our 



*See also Louis M. Martini, The Martinis, an oral history inter 
view conducted 1967-1973. Regional Oral History Office, The 
Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, 1973. 



70 



business." But really, he was so conservative that he didn't feel 
that he really wanted to push wines that way. He was a very 
sincere and conservative man and did a tremendous amount of good 
for the fine wine industry of California. At the Wine Institute 
meetings, he protected that stand very jealously and very 
intelligently, and was really one of the leaders of the industry 
for fine quality wines, and always adhered to that principle. 

Now, Louis Martini was in the business more broadly, much 
bigger, very intelligent, and without a doubt one of the best 
public relations men for promoting wines. He was a strong 
personality. In fact people said it was impossible to talk to 
Louis Martini. On the contrary, when I met him, the first time, 
in fact I went right to his office. I think I spent all morning 
with him. We had the most wonderful time, highly intelligent, 
knowledgeable about wines, dedicated to wines, loved wine and 
food. I remember wining and dining with him at times at his home 
where he did the cooking. Very good, very excellent, and was 
always interested in wines, bringing up better wines all the time 
if you went there. A man that had a tremendous effect upon wine 
growing. 

When I came here in the valley, the people that were out 
standing were, of course, Inglenook, and there was Beaulieu, which 
was the highly regarded. Louis Martini was the Johnny-come- lately 
because he came in after. But his idea of quality was so great, 
and he did such an outstanding job, that he immediately was 
accepted as one of the truly fine wineries of Napa Valley. He was 
very, very effective. 

Now, Louis Stralla was an entirely different character. He 
was in the valley. He was in the bulk wine business. He bought 
grapes and crushed grapes for people like the Roma Wine Company 
which was J. B. Cella. He was a man that was into everything, 
whether it was fine wines or not. He didn't make fine wines, but 
he was good friends of everyone in the industry. He did a lot of 
good for Napa Valley. He sold the wares of Napa Valley. 

He was a good friend, a wonderful friend of ours. Although I 
didn't do business with him directly, that is make wine for him, 
or he make wine for us, we competed with each other. He had his 
bulk winery, the Napa Wine Company. We had the C. Mondavi & Sons. 
We competed. But he was another man that was always completely 
honest; never did he tell me, even when we were competing for 
grapes, did he ever tell me anything that wasn't true, or honest. 
In other words, we were true to each other.' We kept our word. 

This is one of the things I will say that we had in our 
industry. We had that integrity. We always were honest to each 
other. That's one reason I've enjoyed our industry. But these 
people were very instrumental. 







: - 



c 

to 



CO 

00 r- 1 

3 l-i 
CO 

O 

cn 

01 > 

1-1 I-* 

to 01 

U -r-l 



to 

O 

C 



0) 

H C 
C -H 




O 

o 



so 
c 



c 
cu 



3 0) 
0) O 03 

! 



>-, >H C 

0) C -H 

43 -H N 

,3 4-1 N 

< M 3 



rH C 
C 

3 

oc cn 

c 

H " 
)-l -H 

0) C 
-C )-i 

u O 

to u. 

00 



CO 

01 01 

0) cn 1-1 

I-i -H ft. 
fe 3 

O - 



01 

c 



a 

o 

O 

a 



CO 

> CO 

H 0) 

4-1 i I 

cn i-i 

01 CO 

[Z, _ 
u 
cn 

01 cn 

C S-" 

4-J 0) 

C _C 

H 4-J 

> O 

>-> 03 

OI 

rH C 

rH CO 

CO -H 

> 4J 

cn 

CO -H 

O. l-i 

to JS 

2 U 



CO 

c 
01 



o oi 

i-( O 3S 
S C 

01 

. I-( AJ 

cn oo cn 

T3 c 

CO C 

>. * C 

01 3 

e i-i cn 
H n 
> 



00 

c 



01 



3 cn 

OJ t-l 

H OI 

i I iH 

3 C 

CO CO 

0) O cn 

03 

C -H 

- J= C 

H O -H 

C "-) 4-1 

H M 

l-i > CO 

J2 00 2 

CO 3 



H O 



o 

!-i 

03 



v 
S 

O 



cn o) 

rH O) C 



* CO 

cn 4: 1-1 

O O Ol 

oo 
- c 

H -H 

> ^ 

CO OJ 
O 03 


s ^ 



to 



0) 



0) 

60 

c 



3 01 
OI O OI 



71 



And of course, Andre Tschelistchef f as a winemaker, not a 
proprietor or owner, was outstanding because he was the one that 
had the complete training in the French style of winemaking. 
Whereas Louis Martini went to the enology school in Italy, so he 
approached it from the Italian style of winemaking. Louis Martini 
wanted to capture the character of the grape, and was not 
interested as much in aging it in small barrels where you would 
marry the oak with the wine. He wanted the true character of the 
fruit. 

I had a difference with Louis. Louis said, "Why do you age 
your wine so long in oak?" He said, "The good Lord made the 
grape, and that's the way it should be." And I said, "Louis, I 
understand what you say, and I agree as far as you go. But the 
good Lord also made the oak. And he made the grape." And I said, 
"When you marry it together, I like it better with my food that 
way." He looked at me. But we had that honest difference between 
us. But we had a wonderful rapport. We enjoyed our differences 
of opinion. We had respect for what each of us were doing. 

Teiser: You mentioned that Andrfe Tchelistchef f had suggested experiments 
to you earlier. I suppose one of them was his malo-lactic 
fermentation experiments? 

Mondavi: Malo-lactic fermentation was there. He did that later, with the 
Pinot Noirs. That was some years later. We carried on our own 
malo-lactic fermentation work after Andre no longer was consulting 
with us. That's when he really began to work on his malo-lactic 
fermentation, not when he was consulting with us. 

But there was a lot going on with Andre- Immediately when we 
bought the Charles Krug Winery and we built our aging cellar, we 
had thirteen hundred barrels that we were aging wines in. That 
was even more barrels than Beaulieu had. I didn't realize that. 
I didn't know how many barrels they had, but I heard that they had 
around eleven hundred or something like that. When he saw that we 
were in barrel aging that much, he became very interested in us. 

I went to see Andrb The two people that they claim were the 
untouchables in a way, in the industry here, were Louis Martini 
and Andre Tchelistchef f. They called Andre the Russian, the 
Stalin of the industry, and Louis Martini the Italian. He was the 
Mussolini of the industry. Because they were so powerful in their 
own. I heard that it was very difficult to talk to them. Well, I 
deliberately went to talk to both of them, 'and I had a wonderful 
time with each of them. I remember the first time I met Andre, 
going up to him. Andrfe is very erect. He's up there; he's ten 
feet tall when you're talking to him. And yet he's very short. 
Yet very proud. But very interested. And we had a wonderful 
talk. 



72 



I invited him to come and see what we were doing. I explained 
to him what we were doing, and we wanted to get in the fine wine 
business. I had bought all these barrels, and when he saw them, 
he was very impressed. He saw all the barrels and everything that 
we did; he couldn't believe what we were doing. Then that's when 
I invited him to consult with us. He said he was able to do that 
in the evening, so that's what he did. 

We worked for a number of years together, and we did a 
tremendous amount of work, exciting and really interesting. This 
was all during the evening that we did that. And then we carried 
on the research work in our winery, work that he could not carry 
on at B. V. We did all the research work at our winery. 

Teiser: You got into the Beaulieu winery? 

Mondavi: I've been in the Beaulieu winery. In fact, when they had the fire 
there, we fermented all of their white wine and some of the red. 

I remember when Andrfe was able to get Madame de Pins*, and 
the entire family to come over and take a look at what we were 
doing to ferment our white wines cold. That's the way he was able 
to get them to put all the refrigeration in B. V. Because with 
our white wines, they would come and touch our valves, and they 
were frosted because we were chilling the wines very cold. They 
walked through and the next thing I knew they adopted many of the 
principles of cold fermentation that we used. We were the ones 
that were doing the research work. We've never stopped doing 
research work. There is no one in the world that I know of doing 
the amount of research work in the fine wine business that we're 
doing. 

Teiser: Are your research people in on your tastings too? 
Mondavi: They are always in our tastings. 



Paving Growers by the Bottle Price Formula 



Teiser: Would you discuss the bottle price formula? 

Mondavi: The one reason [for it was that] I felt that there wasn't a good 
relationship between the grower and the vintner, because the 
industry wasn't making quite as much money as they would like to 
make. They weren't getting as much money for their wines as they 
would like, and the growers could not be paid enough. I wanted to 



*Helen de Latour de Pins 



73 



try to have a closer tie with the grower so that we wouldn't have 
these great fluctuations where at one time prices would go 
extremely high, and another time the prices would go very low. 
This was due to the size of the crop. When the crop was light the 
price was high. When the crop was big the price was very low. So 
I decided that I would come out with a bottle price formula for 
Napa Valley wines, and I would pay our growers based upon the 
selling price of our wine. 

In the beginning, the people were quite skeptical. But we 
were able to get about forty or fifty percent of our growers to 
come into the bottle price formula, and then when they began to 
see that it was working out very favorably, most of them have come 
into it. Practically all of them are in on our bottle price 
formula now. And frankly, it's worked out very well. 

But I remember I told the growers that the bottle price 
formula would also have to reflect the quality of the grapes that 
we get. We should pay the price predicated on the quality of the 
grapes. But we don't have as yet the proper type of formula. We 
are going to have to learn through our experience which grapes are 
the best. There are certain regions here that will do better on a 
certain variety of grapes. Others will do better on others. Over 
the years we are going to have to improve the bottle price formula 
that will reflect the quality of the grapes that are there. 

We were not as advanced in the wine business at that time. 
However, today, we know there are considerable differences due to 
the area where the grape are coming from, the size of the crop, 
the sugar, acid, pH, these are variables that are in it. 

We are still working on a bottle price formula. In 1985 we 
are going to change the formula to allow us to reflect the quality 
of the grapes that are grown in the various locations. In the 
beginning we weren't able to do that. Of course, we tried to be 
selective as we sought growers. We were in Pope Valley, Conn 
Valley. These were new areas. Some of those have turned out very 
well and some not as well. What we're trying to do is re-adjust 
our formula to reflect the quality of the grapes grown from that 
particular region with the size of the crop as well as other 
factors. Certain regions will be a hundred percent for a certain 
grape. Another region will be ninety percent. Another region 
will be eighty percent. 

Teiser: Complex. 

Mondavi: Well, it is complex. I remember when I wanted to bring in the 

University of California as one of the members of a committee with 
the members of the growers and ourselves to come and up and try to 
set up a system whereby we would pay growers based upon the 
location where the grapes came from, the variety of the grapes, 



74 



and then predicated upon the quality of the grapes. Do you know 
that the growers were not interested in doing that? They didn't 
want to do that because each of them felt they could do better 
negotiating individually. So all we had was a general price 
structure. 

Now that the competition is getting much keener, and we have 
wines coming from overseas, and the quality becomes a very 
important factor, we are going to readjust our bottle price 
formula to reflect where the grapes come from, the sugar, acid, 
the pH, and the number of tons of grapes they get from each acre. 
Because all of this has an effect upon the quality. We have now 
to work out our own program step by step. 

This is a rather intricate situation, but the world over, 
people have done that. They do this in other fruits and 
vegetables. They have to, by and large. And this is the process 
of growing up. So we are moving in that direction. Right now our 
prices, if you check our prices, they are higher than anyone in 
the industry here because, first, we are charging more money for 
our wines. But the growers are getting a good price, over-all 
average, as compared with other growers. There may be some 
boutique wineries that might be paying slightly higher prices 
there. But we are paying by far a higher price than the majority 
without a doubt, based upon our price of wines, which is higher. 
And the return to the grower is a good one relatively speaking. 
So this is the thing that we're going through at the present time. 



The Bottle Price Formula and Wine Quality 

[The following discussion of grower relations took place at the 
interview of October 15, 1984, to be added to the discussion of 
April 12.] 



Teiser: How do the growers know what you want from them? 

Mondavi: Well, very frankly we sit down with them. First of all we had to 
see that they received more money and that they had to feel secure 
about what we were doing, because unfortunately the growers (and 
anybody) are very skeptical about people promising anything. 

Teiser: Do you have contracts? 

Mondavi: We have contracts. We have ten, twenty year, ten to fifteen year 
contracts with them, and they know that they will be able to bank 
on that. 



75 



The only way you can have confidence is by having an under 
standing in writing, which we do with them. We have many growers 
that want to come to us because they know we have long-range 
commitment. They know that we're looking for quality. Frankly, 
we have hurt ourselves in a way because we made commitments on 
price. But at that time we didn't have all the factors necessary 
for the kind of quality we want. We find that the grower can 
produce more tonnage, yet we don't have the necessary controls. 
By overcropping a vinyard you water down the grapes and they don't 
have the body, they don't have the depth, and that is a difficult 
problem we have with the growers today. However, little by little 
they are beginning to thin their crops out realizing that we 
cannot maintain our prices on our wines if we don't get the grapes 
out with a normal crop rather than having a heavier crop. 



We are learning to do this now as we're going along, because 
at first we only used sugar as a criteria for paying for the 
grapes. Now we're beginning to consider size of crop, sugar, 
acid, pH, and different regions. In other words, a certain area 
such as Carneros or Calistoga will have a factor that we're trying 
to develop now. We're going to have an area like, for instance, 
right here in the heart of Napa Valley, in Oakville, we feel is 
the best area for Cabernet Sauvignon because of climate, soil, the 
combination of factors. So we may have a factor of one hundred 
here. Then, if you go to Calistoga it would be a lower factor. 
So we are going to try to change this; when we set up our bottle- 
price formula in the beginning we were not aware of all this to 
that extent, and the competition wasn't that keen for quality, so 
therefore, our yardstick was only simply sugar. Now we are in the 
process of changing this so that is becomes more meaningful. 



Thank God through our marketing and our wine-making ability 
we've been able to convince the American people to pay a little 
bit more money for our wine as compared with others. Its a 
process of working very slowly, and our growers are beginning to 
understand this, and the majority are beginning to cooperate. 
Some of them are fighting to the degree where they want to get the 
maximum tonnage, [laughs] It's a normal situation in life. 



Teiser: Its amazing that you've been able to control it to the extent that 
you have. 



Mondavi: This year we're going to have a bottle price but we are going to 



76 



Teiser: 
Mondavi : 



Teiser: 



Mondavi; 



change the parameters. Many people will say, "Legally I got you 
here, you got to pay the same price everywhere." But if your 
quality isn't the same, we'll say, "Your Cabernet that is grown 
in the Oakville region definitely is better than that grown in 
Calistoga (Calistoga's too warm)." It's not going to be easy for 
us to get growers to accept a lesser price because the Cabernet 
grapes aren't as good in Calistoga when they're turned into wine. 
Our contracts either have to run out, or we have to have a 
compromise. If we can work with each other that way, we think 
we're better off in the long run. 

You've done pretty well so far but you want to do better 

That's right. We have to do better because if we don't, the 
Europeans are beginning to learn from us winemaking technique. 
They are improving their quality, and the American people still 
think because it has a European title on it that it's better, when 
it's not. We have to make better wine, and if we don't we're 
going to lose our position as being the leaders in winemaking 
technique and grape growing. I think we have to make the maximum 
use of our land here. 

Do you think that your growers will plant to other varieties 
gradually? 

They did a tremendous job. We worked a deal. We had certain 
people here that had planted a lot of the Zinfandel, a lot of 
Camay. We've gotten them to transfer over to Sauvignon blanc, 
we've got them to go into the better varieties that we wanted: 
Semillon, Cabernet, and Pinot noir. They did transfer over a 
good percentage. 

They did it because we could prove to them they could make 
more money in the long run by doing that with our contracts, and 
they're very happy they did it. In fact, we just had a meeting 
with a large group of growers our "Cal plan." They're happy 
because they're making more money having done that. But we had to 
prove to them, by doing that in the long run they would make more 
money, even though it cost them more money for about a couple of 
years until those grapes were coming back. 

In other words they T-budded their Zinfandels, their Gamays, 
the other varieties, their Petit Sirahs. They went over into the 
varieties that we wanted. The Cabernet, the Pinot noir, the 
Chardonnay, the Sauvignon blanc these in the appropriate areas. 
They did that and so this is the way we were able to do that, but 
we had to convince them. We were surprised how effective it was. 
One of the things that happened here that is upsetting our plans, 
we had a ten year program. But the grapes [that they planted] are 
about twenty-five percent more productive; they're coming in a 
year faster then we thought they would come in, so here we are 



77 



with an overabundance of grapes. 

Right now we transferred one thousand tons of our Sauvignon 
blanc from here over to Woodbridge, to go into our vintage white. 
We're paying eight, nine hundred dollars a ton for Napa Sauvignon 
blanc, whereas over there it's only four hundreds a ton; but we 
know in another two, three or four years, this is going to swing. 
We'll have the grapes going into our winery here. We try to judge 
what would be going on. Well, we didn't realize the increased 
tonnage. They have better techniques in handling grapes. Their 
productivity is greater than we anticipated, and they're coming in 
sooner than we anticipated, so all of a sudden we have an 
oversupply of grapes according to our projections. 

Teiser: Do you mean they were planted on roots, or were they T-budded? 

Mondavi: I'm talking about the grapes that started from beginning. They're 
coming in much faster, they're bearing much faster. In three 
years they were getting a ton per acre instead of waiting until 
they were four years. They're getting much more production. 
Instead of getting, we'll say, four tons per acre, they're getting 
five and six. We are amazed and they are amazed too, you see? 

Right now we have an overproduction we're faced with. We 
have a fixed contract. We weren't smart enough to say, "Okay, 
we'll take so many tons per acre." So, we are having a difficult 
time, we have an oversupply of grapes but we're very lucky that 
we have our vintage red, vintage white, and vintage roste in 
Woodbridge, because we can then take those grapes (even though we 
have a difference of four hundred dollars a ton), we can at least 
put them there and upgrade our wine. Eventually, as our sales 
increase here we can bring it back in here. This is a great loss 
to us due to production greater than anticipated. 

Teiser: That's fascinating. 

Mondavi: It is fascinating, but this is the heart of the problem. In order 
to try to upgrade our quality we have to go through all of these 
things. We're going through "aches and pains" and we're lucky 
that we've established our prices high enough so that we have 
enough margin of profit so that we can carry on this and absorb 
this. Just that one operation is four hundred thousand dollars 
more than it costs us that thousand tons that's going over there 
each year. It's a realistic problem. 

Teiser: Do you have one person in charge of your vineyards? 

Mondavi: Yes. Tim [Mondavi] is the president in charge of the vineyards. 
But Charlie Williams is the manager of the vineyard operation. 
Then, of course, we have quite a few other people that are on the 
staff that work directly under Charles Williams. As we are 



78 



Teiser : 
Mondavi : 



growing bigger, we now have Phil Freese who is a liaison with the 
growers and is doing research work in the vineyards. We are 
beginning to establish a clonal vineyard. 

We are beginning to have people who are concentrating on the 
quality of the grapes from the various areas. We are pinpointing 
the quality of our grapes based upon the location of the grapes, 
the yield that we're making, and we're carrying on research work 
as far as clones for the future. That will be another fifteen, 
twenty years before we'll know what that will do. 

But we are doing all that research work in order to enhance 
our quality, realizing competition from overseas is coming, and we 
have to produce a style of our own that can compete with any of 
the wines of the world. What we have to do is be able to produce 
a wine that goes well with food. In my opinion, because of our 
climatic conditions, which I think are some of the finest in the 
world, without a doubt We were making our wines too big, too 
rich, during the seventies and the eighties. Now we're beginning 
to pick these grapes somewhat earlier than we did in the past, not 
make our wines as fat and as tanniny, and more drinkable. 

We are going through another changing period in winemaking. 
And you will find in the next ten years, our wines will be far 
more drinkable, far more elegant than they are today, whereas up 
to now, I think our wines by and large were big and heavy. We 
weren't aware of what to do in order to make them more drinkable. 
Not only that, our standard of living is beginning to increase. 
The American people are realizing that they can have wines which 
are more palatable and better with their food. 

Do you think that part of the reason that we have had these heavy 
wines is the Italian tradition in California? 

No. If you take many of the Italian wines, they are much lighter 
than ours, much lighter. I think the American people felt that 
the wines of Europe were big. When you talk about Burgundy, the 
big wines. Many of the wines in Burgundy are very light and very 
delicate. They are not that big, rich wine that they think they 
are. I think it's just a misconception. Writers who are not as 
knowledgeable as they think they are all pick heavy wines as being 
the best wines, but they're not. And that we are slowly learning. 



Mike. Marcie. and Tim Mondavi 



Teiser: I should ask you to talk of your children a little bit and their 



79 



future in the industry. 

Mondavi: Mike was the oldest. Mike, from the time he was a youngster, 

always wanted to be in the wine business. He was interested in 
working in the cellar. In fact when we had our maintenance man, 
he would go around with him, following him all over the winery, 
when he was just a child. When he graduated from college, he 
worked with us. He was a winemaker. First he worked in the 
cellar [at C. Mondavi & Sons], and then finally he became the 
winemaker for us at Robert Mondavi Winery. Then he worked up to 
the point of being sales manager. As a sales manager he then went 
out to represent us, and then became the president of the company. 

Marcie was a teacher at one time, and then she decided to be 
an air stewardess, and then decided to leave that and come and 
represent us. She has been with us ever since, and she has 
enjoyed it very much. She has done an outstanding job for us in 
New York. She calls on the retail trade. She was there just at 
the right time. It was ideal because the American people at that 
time were beginning to demand some California wines in the better 
retail stores and the better restaurants of New York. And Marcie 
happened to get in there right at that particular time, and she 
was very effective in getting our wines placed in the better 
restaurants of New York, in fact in most of the restaurants. 

I've been very, very pleased. She's very articulate. We now 
have other representatives who call on the trade. She represents 
us whether it's TV programs, radio programs. She appeared before 
the wine and food society groups. 

I remember the time that we gave a component tasting. In 
fact she was the one with Gary Ramona that instituted what I call 
component tastings. She wanted to find out how can you explain 
the different tastes in wines. And then we realized the 
University of California* had that component tasting. So my son 
and daughter brought this to the Wine and Food Society in New 
York, and they were very impressed. The president of the London 
Wine and Food Society was there, and he was impressed. They were 
having the anniversary of the Wine and Food Society in London, and 
wanted Mike and Marcie to do that. Well, Mike had a commitment 
to talk before someone else and couldn't do it. So they asked 
Marcie. 

I remember my daughter was just scared to death. I remember 
talking to her on the phone. And Mike talked to her and finally 
was able to convince her that she could do an outstanding job. 
She gave this component tasting there. People were so impressed 
that they began to talk about it. It was by far the most popular 
of any function that they had over there. And I received these 
letters from both the president of the London chapter, and also 
from the New York president, a glowing tribute to what my daughter 



*Davis 



80 



Teiser: 
Mondavi: 



did there. She's just that articulate. 

That was something that was unique. You see, these are the 
things that we did. And then we had our seminars. My daughter 
helped create the idea of holding seminars for wine writers and 
for our representatives. We brought them here. We showed them 
how we grew grapes and what we did with pruning and budding, and 
how we crush and ferment the grapes. We did that during the 
harvest season. This was very educational. We taught people 
this. You see, we were opening up everything about winemaking. 
We didn't want secrets. 

And all of a sudden this was very exciting and interesting to 
writers. If you remember fifteen years ago, or ten years ago, no 
writers would ever come to California about wine. But today these 
people pay their own way coming to California. I couldn't believe 
that a few years ago. But you see, this is the big change that's 
taking place. Yes, we took care of them here. We put them up, we 
fed them, and all that. But they came over on their own. That 
was never the case because the industry wasn't that important. 
However, things are changing. Things are moving along very, very 
well. 

How about your son Tim? 

Tim was the youngster that looked at the various schools he wanted 
to go to, and he decided he wanted to go to Davis. 



Teiser: Had Michael not gone to Davis? 

Mondavi: No, Michael went to Santa Clara. But Tim looked around. He said 
he wanted to go to Davis. However, when he was a freshman, I 
thought he had enrolled for the enology school. He had almost 
gone through the whole year when I realized that he hadn't. So I 
sat down to talk to Tim. I was wondering why he hadn't enrolled 
for enology, since he went to Davis; I thought that was his 
purpose. 

He said, "Well, Dad, I want to be creative. You and Mike are 
making the fine wines. I would like to create something of my 
own." At the same time, he said, "You are working all the time. 
I would like to have things of my own, my chickens, my horses. I 
don't want to work seven days a week and things like that." He 
said, "Yes, I want to work. But I'd like to have something that 
would give me personal satisfaction." 

So I said, "Tim, listen. First of all, you're in a family 
operation. I can assure you it's going to take you, when you 
graduate from school, another twenty, twenty-five years before you 
can become a member of an organization where you can become 
meaningful, that you can be part of the organization. In this 



81 



family operation that we have here, you are going to be a 
principal, and the policy that we'll establish will be within the 
family. And we'll all have an input in that. Secondly, Mike and 
I are only making sound wine. We're not making fine wines. We 
haven't even scratched the surface, Tim." I said, "Tim, we can 
make wines here for the next, not one, but three or four 
generations, and we'll always learn. This is a very complex 
thing. There's over four hundred elements in wine, each and every 
year is a different year. 

"So Tim, if you want to be creative, we are just getting 
started in the business. And you can go on and on." 

He actually saved his money (all our children saved their 
money to go to Europe), and he was going to Europe. I gave him 
the name of a dozen or so wineries that he could have visited. He 
visited two or three. And then he saw that these vintners had 
their own way of living, their horses, their cows, their chickens, 
their vegetables and all of that. He came back. He enrolled in 
the enology course. 

I got the biggest kick out of it. Now only about a year or 
so ago, or less than that, I said, "Tim, do you remember when you 
told me you wanted to be creative?" 



Mondavi: "You wanted to get into something that could be creative and you 
could do your own thing." And I said, "Now, Tim, what do you 
think of this now?" He said, "Dad, you know, we just are barely 
scratching the surface. There's still so much to do." In other 
words, even though we've made all this progress, Tim now knows 
that there is so much more to do to create wines of elegance, of 
drinkability. I would say he thought about fifteen years ago that 
we knew everything about winemaking. Well, he now knows he can 
work all the rest of his life and his children's children can do 
that and yet not know enough about winemaking. 

So Tim has been very, very happy. My daughter Marcie has been 
extremely happy. I would like to say that Tim has taken a special 
interest in understanding wine. Mike was more interested in the 
selling, more contacting with people. Mike was a good winemaker, 
but his dedication was understanding people, working with people 
on the administrative end of the thing, which he's in right now, 
and which he has been doing. Whereas Tim desires to know every 
thing about winemaking, and working with people in this regard. 

So we are very blessed. We have these extremes where Tim 
wants to go into the minute details of winemaking, which he is 
doing even to a greater degree than I did. So really, in that 
regard we are in good hands. Mike now has been through all of 



82 



that. Mike is now on the outside, working and representing us 
with the Wine Institute, with the federal government, with our 
expansion in programs for the future and things like that. 

It's worked out exceptionally well, and they are all very 
pleased and very happy. And I'm trying to pull as fast away from 
this as I possibly can, so they can take over on their own. 



The Creation of Opus One 



What else do we have there to talk about? [referring to 
outline of suggested subjects] 

Teiser: I haven't asked you about the venture you are just now 
Mondavi: The joint venture with Baron Philippe [de Rothschild], 
Teiser: Yes. 

Mondavi: The Baron Philippe called on me twice. In fact for this whole 
thing, you have to give credit to the foresight of the Baron 
Philippe, not to myself. The first time he called on me was in 
the early 1970s when we had a WSWA [Wine and Spirits Wholesalers 
of America] convention in the Hawaiian Islands. Philippe Cottin, 
who is the man in charge of all his operation called me and said, 
"The baron would like to speak to you if you wouldn't mind coming 
to his suite there." 

I was very honored. So I went there. In fact he's a very 
personable man. He's very down to earth, and very friendly. He 
said, "Bob, I'm very much interested in California wine." He 
said, "I'm interested particularly in one grape, the Cabernet 
grape. I've been coming here, and I've been evaluating that. 
Would you be interested in any way of working with me on 
something?" I said, "Well, I don't know what you have in mind. 
I'm very honored that you will talk to me and want to talk to me." 
He said that he wanted to talk to me before talking to anyone else 
because he felt that from everything he had seen that we should be 
the first people that he should talk to. And I was honored at 
that. 

I said, "Well, no, I can't think of anything. What do you 
have in mind?" He said, "Well, I'm thinking of maybe a Cabernet 
Sauvignon." I said, "Well do you have anything in mind that ?" 
He said, "No, I don't." So we talked for about forty-five 
minutes. And then we parted and he said, "Bob, if you can think 



83 



of anything, will you write me? And if I think of anything, I'll 
write you." 

I was busy with our new winery. In 1966 I started. And this 
was only in '71 or '72. So I was so busy in our winery that I 
couldn't do anything about it. But I didn't realize that the 
Baron himself was very busy because he was coming out with Mouton 
Cadet, his secondary wine. And then he also was buying two other 
chateaux. 

I didn't hear from him until in August of 1978 when his 
representative, Mickey [Miklos] Dora came in from Santa Barbara. 
And he said, "Bob, remember the baron was very much interested in 
working with you, and before talking to anybody else, we would 
like to talk to you again to see if you would be interested in a 
joint venture." "What do you have in mind?" He said, "Well, Bob 
I don't know. Is there any way the two of you can get together?" 

To make a long story short, Marcie was not able to go with me 
on a tour with fifteen of our employees, and I promised to take 
her that November on a tour through the winegrowing regions of 
Europe. He said, "Would you mind meeting with the Baron?" I 
said, "No, I would be very happy." 

So we met with the Baron in November, as his guests, at the 
chateau. At that time we had a beautiful dinner. I won't go into 
details of it, but he had served a hundred-year-old Chateau 
Mouton-Rothschild. He served also a thirty-year-old Chateau Baron 
Philippe Rothschild, which is the second growth. And we had a 
simple but elegant dinner. And then I had breakfast in bed the 
next morning, and my daughter had breakfast in bed, and 
beautifully done. 

We didn't speak a word of business during dinner that evening 
because he had two charming ladies there as well. And he had 
Philippe Cottin, his manager. But after dinner he said, "We 
haven't talked at all about the wine business. Would you mind 
meeting in my bedroom?" He said, "Ninety percent of all my 
business is done in my bedroom." I looked at my daughter, and I 
said, "Would you mind meeting the Baron in his bedroom?" And she 
said, "No, not at all." So we met him there the next morning 
about nine, nine thirty after our breakfast. 

This time he knew exactly what he wanted. He was interested 
in a joint venture. He said to me and he always referred to me, 
just to show you how intelligent and smart this man is, he always 
referred to me first he said, "I would like to have a joint 
venture in which you have fifty percent and I would have fifty 
percent. We don't want it big, we want it small, five thousand 
cases." And he said, "You will put your name on the label, and 
I'll put my name on the label." And I said, "Fine, that sounds 



84 



very interesting." I was surprised that he was willing to go that 
far. Then he said, "Bob, what should we do? Should we have two 
wines or more?" I said, "Well, if you're only having five 
thousand cases, that's so little. Not only that, but we all know 
that Cabernet is the outstanding grape of Napa Valley. And I 
think we should only have one wine." 

So we discussed that and we agreed that it would only be one 
wine. Then he said, "But, however, I would rather not call it 
Cabernet Sauvignon. I would rather have a proprietory name." I 
said, "I'm in accord with that. That's already okay with me too." 
Then he said, "Well, should we have our own vineyard and our own 
winery?" And I said, "Baron, if we want to excel, the only way to 
do it is to have our own vineyards and our own winery." We 
discussed at some length. And then he said, "Would you be willing 
to make the wine in the interim?" I said, yes, we would go along 
until we have our own vineyard and our winery. We would work out 
an arrangement to make this possible. 

Then he turned to me and said, "Bob, I hear you have 
considerable holdings in Napa Valley. Would you mind selling 
twenty or twenty-five acres of your land to the joint venture?" I 
looked the baron square in the eye and I said, "Would you like to 
sell twenty or twenty-five acres of yours?" He said, "Oh, no, no, 
no!" And I said, "Well, I don't want to sell it either." 

We then agreed to give until December of '81 to buy land. 
We've been fortunate. We bought a hundred and forty acres right 
contiguous to our property. Right across the highway we have a 
hundred acres. Do you know where the Oakville Grocery is? 

Teiser: Yes. 

Mondavi: That hundred acres, that Oakville Grocery is the only thing on it. 
There's a hundred acres from that road that goes across the 
valley. There's a hundred acres that goes north. All you have is 
that one acre where the store is. But that restaurant on the 
corner is all ours. And those two shack buildings, all of that is 
ours. That's a hundred acres right there. And that land really 
turns out to be very fine because the grapes we've been crushing, 
right across the road, we like very much. So all of this piece 
has turned out well. We also then sold forty acres at the end of 
our property to tie in, where we think the grapes will possibly 
mature a little bit better, so that we could be assured of having 
top quality. 

So we have a hundred and forty acres. There's about eighty 
acres planted there now. We'll have the balance planted next 
year. We are beginning to have people look into designing 
buildings for the winery. So we will have that built in due time. 
We were lucky, as I say, to buy the land. 



85 



Then the baron said at that time that we hadn't talked about 
the financing of the deal. He said, "We are six thousand miles 
apart. Can you think of anyone that could be a go-between for us 
to work this program up, the financial deal. We agree in 
principle on what we want to do." So I thought of Harry Serlis, 
who used to be the president of the Wine Institute. And he said, 
"Bob, that's the man." I said, "But wait a minute. He's a member 
of my board of directors." "Oh, that's all right." He said, 
"Don't worry about that. I'm not worried about that." 

I didn't realize that Harry Serlis is the man that convinced 
the Baron Philippe of the quality of California wines, because the 
baron was coming to California for years, every year, and he knew 
Harry Serlis very well. Then he asked Harry Serlis, and I didn't 
realize this, about the vintners. Of course, he was representing 
the vintners of California. And he mentioned a half a dozen of 
the vintners that he could call on, and gave him the list. I 
never realized, this is how the baron was able to get in touch. 
That's why the baron called on me. 

Teiser: You were on Harry Serlis' s list? 

Mondavi: He always admired what we did. In fact, "Bob," he said, "you are 
people that are doing outstanding work." So we were always on the 
list. When he took wines to England, we had two of our wines he 
took over. He wanted our wines always. Wherever he went, he 
wanted our wines with him. So we were certain favorites of his. 
I didn't realize that he was this effective until I talked to the 
baron. 

Well, to make a long story short, the baron said, "I'll call 
Harry on the phone, and I would like to meet before the end of the 
year. Since I'm getting along in years, we have to do something 
now." I said, "I'll call Harry and do what we can." Well, to 
make a long story short, Harry could not go before December. He 
went in January, I think in January. We worked out a program. He 
submitted it to the baron. The baron accepted it. Harry was this 
kind of a man. Harry knew that it had to be fair to the baron and 
it had to be fair to us. And the baron knew it too. You see, 
this is the kind of loyalty, this is the kind of understanding you 
needed. 

When I talked to the baron, I looked him square in the eye, 
and he looked at me, and we knew that each of us was speaking 
honestly and straightforwardly. He knew good and well that if he 
had Harry to work this program up, it would be something that 
would be fair, because he knew the man. And also Harry knew that 
he's intelligent enough to know the difference. So basically, we 
had a beautiful deal that was really worked up between Harry and 
myself and our people here, that was submitted to him. And it was 



86 



approved. But even though we agreed on it, it took eighteen 
months to get our attorneys and our lawyers to get that put 
together. So we finally signed that in, I think, March or April 
of 1980. 

However, the baron said while we were still negotiating, 
"Would you mind just making two thousand cases?" That was in 
1979. "I'll supply the barrels." The wine was made in our winery 
in Oakville. 

But there was another thing that I forgot to mention in our 
negotiation, a very important factor. He said, "Bob, since you're 
in California, you should make the wine." I think my jaw dropped. 
I was expecting him to say to me, "Bob, we'll make the wine since 
we are the baron." Had he said that to me, I'd say, "Baron, I've 
had a beautiful dinner, wonderful breakfast in bed, thank you." 
And I would have walked out. Because I would not have taken that. 
But he was too smart for this. He realized it. He said, "You 
make the wine; however, I have my winemaker who's been with me 
forty years, I'd like him to get together with your son, whoever 
makes the wine over there " (well, it would be my son and myself) 
" so we have a joint agreement on that." I said, "I agree 
completely and wouldn't have it otherwise." 

Then after we got through with that meeting in his bedroom, 
Philippe Cottin came to me. He said, "Bob, I wouldn't get your 
hopes up too high. The winemaker here is Lucien Sionneau, and he 
must give his approval for any agreement. He has been brought up 
from the soil of Bordeaux. And, you know, he doesn't like to 
travel. I don't think he's even been to Paris. If I were you, I 
wouldn't get my hopes up too much. But I know he'll go to 
California for the baron." 

Well, he flew in, and I told Tim, "Tim, you get every sample 
of Cabernet Sauvignon that we have, our free run, our press wine, 
from every grower, from all our vineyards, the Cabernet franc as 
well as Merlot. And then after that we'll show him all the 
research work that we have undertaken." 

He came in. He tasted over a hundred and twenty wines. He 
spent ten days here. Then he tasted all our research work. And I 
could see him looking and very amazed at what we were doing and 
all the research work. We showed him all the vineyards that we 
had. He then went on his own with the other people to visit other 
wineries in Napa Valley and Sonoma, and Monterey. He came back in 
three months. He's taken thirteen trips in- less than four years. 
And you know how chauvinistic the French are about things. You 
know how chauvinistic they are about wine. There must be 
something here that's very interesting to them. 



87 



Now he's retiring the end of this year. But still he wants 
to come here and visit. I wanted to bring that out because that 
tells more about what's going on than what the baron and I say. 
The baron and I can make a deal, but this is the wine man who 
thinks from the heart and the head, and it's not money to him in 
that regard. He could see something that was worthwhile. 

And by the way, my son Tim. My son speaks a little bit of 
French, very little. But they got along like two peas in the pod. 
I was with them in the beginning. I now taste the preliminary and 
final blends that they make. They do the whole thing on their 
own. And they're having more fun. It's a beautiful relationship. 

Teiser: This was first called Napa-Medoc, wasn't it? 

Mondavi: Yes, Napa-Medoc. That was a lawyers' name because they were 

making this thing up and they said, "Okay, we'll just make a name 
up for expediency." I tell you, everybody was up in arms on this 
name. 

Then we decided to create a label. Do you know it took us 
two and a half years to create a label and get a name? We had one 
of the largest and well-known label producers. He produced at 
least fifty to sixty labels. First we had men shaking hands 
across the sea. But none of them hit us. We then went to another 
party, Susan Pate. And all of a sudden she came up with this 
label with the two profiles.* This is what we selected. 

And then the name. We had about five hundred names. Finally 
the baron called and said It was two o'clock one night, and it 
dawned on him. "Opus." He got out of bed, and he looked at his 
dictionary, and he went through the entire meaning of opus in the 
dictionary and everything seemed to fit. So he called me. He 
told me Opus, and I said, "Oh," I said, "Opus. Baron, that Pus 
is a word that it not very agreeable in the English language over 
here. Opus, that doesn't ring a bell." My daughter was just in 
arms. "Dad, you can't have a name like that." 

And then about a week later he said, "Bob, I've got it. 
Let's call it Opus One." "Well, Opus One is a lot better than 
just Opus," I said. I said, "All right, that's fine. Let's make 
it 'Opus One; 1 we associate it with music. Fine, we will do 
that." The name was his idea. 



*0f Baron Philippe de Rothschild and Robert Mondavi 



88 



Oh, by the way, at our meeting, when we were in his bedroom, 
he said, "You know, I expect if the quality is right, I think it 
should sell at the same price as the first growths of Europe." 
Can you imagine a Frenchman claiming that a wine from California 
should sell at the same price as their own? Can you believe that? 
When I heard all of this, I couldn't believe it. But you see, the 
thing that made the Rothschild family great for a hundred and 
eighty years was the foresight. They were the financial geniuses 
of Europe for a hundred and eighty years only because of their 
foresight. This is a thing that he could see. I have to give him 
credit in that regard. 

So here we had two people. We are young, we are dedicated, 
we know we can produce wine that has style of its own. And I knew 
that we could learn the subtle differences in winemaking from them 
because here they made wine for many, many years. They knew wines 
that could be drinkable with your meals. I knew they had certain 
things that they were doing; also I knew we were doing things here 
in our research work that they weren't doing. I felt that the two 
of us together could do something that was uniquely different. 
And that's exactly what's happened. 

Even though the degree-days are about the same in Napa Valley 
as in Bordeaux, their wines are quite different, a little bit more 
tart than ours. As our grapes mature, they are softer. What we 
wanted to do was get a little bit of the flesh or the fruit around 
the steeliness, the structure of the French wines. We were not 
picking our grapes as early as we should, and we didn't sculpture 
our wine as much as we should. We kept our wines more natural, 
they sculpture their wines. They hone their wines. They work 
their wines. And that's what we learned. And they learned from 
our research work. So we had a wine which had much more meat to 
the bone. 

What we have now is not a Bordeaux, it's not typically 
Californian. It's our own style. And we've learned to use their 
knowledge with our knowledge to get a wine that has the structure, 
the steeliness, the drinkability that they have in their wines. 
And if you taste our wines, the Opus One, the 1979 and 1980, 
you'll see that that's exactly what we have. It's coming in 
harmony with the structure, the steeliness. We've added that 
character that we get by the extra fruit that we can get in our 
grapes that they don't get in Europe, unless they get a very warm 
year. 

So it's neither the French, nor is it typically California. 
We have created something here that I think you'll find is a step 
in the right direction, just as when we brought barrels in and we 
began to change our winemaking technique. I think this is going 
to be another step in developing a style of wine that is going to 



89 



give us far more drinkability with our food and be much more 
pleasing, and be Lighter and lower in alcohol and be a better wine 
over-all. This is the thing that we're working on. 

Teiser: Will it then affect your winemaking across the board? 

Mondavi: It affects everything because this we were doing anyway. We were 
moving very slowly. We were sculpturing our wine. We began to 
clarify our wine. We were doing all of this. But we did it very 
slowly. When they came into the picture, we went along much more 
rapidly. So what they've done, they've helped us gain ten years 
because eventually we were going to do this anyway. And this is 
where that relationship has been so tremendously valuable. 

We're going to do it in all of our wines because all we're 
doing is picking our grapes a little earlier. Instead of leaving 
the wines with their natural imperfections, we are now learning to 
hone, to sculpture and to work our wines to make them much more 
palatable and yet natural. It's just like having a child brought 
up and not being taught anything, without what we consider 
culture. But anyway, it's a question of having the proper 
treatment. And if you have it, it can be much more beautiful, 
much more harmonious if done properly. Mother Nature is very 
cruel at times. You can freeze to death, or you can die by heat 
prostration. And then you can be in the balmy areas and have a 
beautiful existence. So Mother Nature isn't always the best thing 
you can have. You take the best of what Mother Nature will offer 
you. This is the thing we are working on. 

I'm excited about this because I know what it will do for 
California. I know what it will do for the United States. I 
think this is a tremendous step forward. From my point of view, 
it's another breakthrough because we are getting something here 
that is going to be much more drinkable, lighter, and much more 
pleasing, and yet will have longevity. 

Teiser: What longevity do you anticipate? 

Mondavi: I say that if you place the wine in the proper cellar it will age 
just like the French, whether it be fifty years, a hundred years. 
Of course, it's silly to age any wine that long. But we're going 
to have wines put aside that I'll never have the opportunity of 
drinking at their full maturity. But my great-grandchildren will 
see the day. And they will have wine that will be a hundred years 
old. It will maintain itself that way. I have seen our Charles 
Krug wine that was over forty years of age which was beautiful. 
Today our wines will age much longer with much more complexity. 
They will become much smoother. But the difference that you have 
to pay for insurance and taxes, it's silly. But you can have wine 
that will age that long. I have no concern about that. 



90 



The practical thing is that these wines, the way they are 
made, they can be exceedingly good after seven to ten years. Then 
they are reaching a point where they have real smoothness and 
complexity. But if you drink them younger than that, just like 
those on the market now even the great growths that they have 
over there in Bordeaux or Burgundy they're not mature when 
they're only three to four years old. When they get to be minimum 
seven to ten years old, that's when they're beginning to get a 
wine that has considerable harmony and character. 

But the cost of that is so prohibitive, you know. But still 
there are those people that have the money, the means, and will 
want that once they are accustomed to that. I never realized why 
they can sell so many Mercedes that sell for twenty-five percent 
to one hundred percent of the price of anything else. Yet those 
people will spend the money. They'll buy Rolls Royces. They'll 
buy certain cars. Sevilles will cost nowhere near what the 
Mercedes do. And they'll do the same thing with wine. It's part 
of the gracious way of living. 



Wine and Food 



And what's happening today that I feel so good about is that 
the world at large is appreciating more gracious living more than 
ever before. We went backwards for a number of years, for the 
last fifteen or twenty years. Now there's a surge the world over 
to go back to better food, better wines, and achieving or wanting 
to excel. 

I'm excited about this for not only wine but also food. 
That's why we are holding our Great Chefs of France, our Great 
Chefs of America now. We're having the Great Chefs of America. 
We are going to be the great shining light in the next generation 
in wine and foods. America and California will be the great 
shining light. For wine California will be. But the United 
States of America will be for foods because we have the natural 
resources. We have the fish, the fowl, the beef, the veal, the 
vegetables, the grains. We have all of this and more. The people 
are getting excited who are beginning to become really culinary 
artists. And this is growing by leaps and bounds. I'm so excited 
about it because I remember when I was talking to Ella Brennan [in 
New Orleans]. About two and a half years ago, we were having a 
tasting with Ella. And she said, "You know, Bob, I wish we had a 
leader in our food industry like you are doing for the wine 
business. You have set the pace and are way ahead of us. Here we 
have so much to offer, and what you've done, you have been able to 



91 



Teiser: 
Mondavi: 



go out and produce wines in Napa Valley, at your winery, that 
belong in the company of the finest. We have no one like that 
that's done that for us in the food industry." 

However, in the last three years, the food industry is sky 
rocketing. There are Alice Waters, Paul Prudhomme, Wolfgang Puck, 
Larry Flagroni, Bradley Ogden, and many other outstanding American 
chefs. In our winery we're going to build another kitchen to 
further the cause of the Great Chefs of America. And we feel that 
food and wine belong together. That's why we're doing all this. 
We don't do any advertising, no radio, no TV. All of our work is 
to be done that way. 

Wines and Vines has an ad. We put it only for the purpose of 
helping Wines and Vines. Everything else we do is word of mouth. 
We have wine tastings. We have our Great Chefs of France program. 
We have component tasting. We have seminars. We have harvest 
seminars. We do all of that kind of work. No advertising, no 
radio, no TV. We travel the world over to understand what's going 
on. We've been to Australia. My son has been to South Africa. 
I've been to Europe many times, at least two or three times a 
year, to understand. I learn from people. This is now being 
transmitted to our whole staff, not only my children, all of them. 
We are educating everyone there. That's what's so important about 
this. 

So the future 

The future is exciting. 



I feel that in the next ten years, we will make as much if 
not more progress than we have in the past ten years from the 
point of view of having elegant, much more drinkable wines than we 
have today. From the seventies up to now, we have made big wines, 
rich wines, sound wines. But now we are going to be making more 
elegant wines, much more drinkable wines with our foods. We are 
going to see this develop in the next ten years. And the 
competition is tremendously keen. We have all these people who 
have been trained at the enology schools, the viticultural 
schools. We know the competition is very keen overseas. We are 
all aware of this. 

Look, right now I invited thirty to forty people to come 
from Italy to visit us. I invited them as guests of our winery 
for tomorrow. I have a hundred and thirty five people coming in 
This shows you the tremendous interest. The Italians want to 
learn, and that's what they've being doing for a number of years, 
and they are improving their winemaking technique. They have good 
soil and climatic conditions. What they need is to try to improve 



92 



their techniques. 

And we have to go a step further. I realize the importance 
of this. If we don't, we are going to be having problems, because 
their labor, their soil is much cheaper than ours. And we have to 
learn to improve our winemaking and grape growing technique, which 
we will. We are going to have to improve the drinkability of our 
wines, which we will do, and also productivity, with character and 
with style. These are all the things that we have to work on and 
will do. 



The Napa Valley Wine Symposium and Auction^ 
[Interview 4: October 15, 1984] 



Teiser: Would you tell about the beginning of the Napa Valley Wine 
Symposium? 

Mondavi: Yes. Bill Hall came to me and he said, "Bob, you know we'd like 
to have an educational program with the hoteliers, the 
restaurateurs, on Napa Valley wine." He said, "Would you think it 
would be a good idea if we had something like this, and invited 
them all to come to Napa Valley? Could we get the support of the 
vintners to come in and have an educational program? From the 
growing of the grapes and the making of the wine?" I said, "My 
God, what an excellent idea." I said, "Lets go to the Napa Valley 
Vintners and talk with them." They discussed it there and we got 
their support. 

Then when they started, you see everybody likes the idea but 
nobody wishes to do any work. The symposium was dying because we 
weren't getting enough support for it. So I called in my sales 
manager, Gary Ramona, and (he could tell you) we had our whole 
staff calling on the various restaurateurs, hoteliers, throughout 
the USA to get them to come to the symposium. If it weren't for 
that we wouldn't have had enough people coming. That's how we 
played a very important with that the first two years, and then it 
was carried on. 

Now they've skipped a year, and I'm really put out. I'm a 
little bit mad. I didn't realize this (you see my sons are 
members of the Vintners). They skipped this year with the idea 
that they were going to do it the following year, when they could 
put more time and effort in. I was put out because now they have a 
manager of the Napa Valley Vintners, and this man could have 
carried it on. They claim that they're going to go into it next 



93 



year. I can assure you I'm going to strongly support the 
symposium the next year around because I want to see to it that 
they continue this. In the long run this is a good educational 
program to let the people know the importance of Napa Valley 
wines. I think they made a mistake by not continuing it on this 
year. They were getting the support by the country club, and we 
need that kind of support. So I'm going to do everything I can, 
through my sons, to see that they hold the symposium next year as 
well. All it takes is the desire and will to realize its future 
importance. 

Teiser: Mike Silva, the manager, is going to give a luncheon Thursday in 
San Francisco. 

Mondavi: That's on behalf of the Napa Valley public relations program. 
When John Daniel was there, I said, "We should have a public 
relations program for Napa Valley." Well, finally, after many 
years, they now have it because we need to let the people know the 
importance of Napa Valley in the world of wine. I think it's 
ideal. In fact it's going to be interesting to see what they do. 
That's going to be a press conference, is that it? 

Teiser: It's going to be a morning tasting of last year's vintages and 
luncheon and discussion. 

Mondavi: We need to do these things to bring the attention of the world 
to what we're doing here in Napa Valley, let alone the state of 
California. 

Teiser: The Napa Valley Auction however, certainly focuses a lot of 
attention on the Napa Valley. 

Mondavi: Very definitely. John Daniel and I, we were trying to think of 

ways that we could have a program. We were thinking of having the 
San Francisco Symphony come here. We were thinking of other 
things. Before, Napa Valley used to have these vintage parades, a 
vintage festival. It was more of a carnival than anything else. 
We didn't want to do that, we didn't think it would be worthwhile. 
We could never think of anything and then, I think I explained to 
you about how Fat Montandon came to me. 

Teisler: Yes but you didn't explain it when we were taping. 
Mondavi: All of a sudden, one day Pat Montandon came to me. 

By the way, may I explain this background. The vintners are 
the tightest, toughest people when it Gomes' to spending any money. 
They had little foresight about trying to spend money for the 
future. They won't break loose because business might become 
better. This I can assure you of. 



94 



So when Pat Montandon came to me, and she said, "Bob, I have 
a party each and every year. I'd like to make a wine-tasting out 
of it. Would you support me in having a wine-tasting?" Then I 
said, "Oh my God, Pat, instead of having a wine-tasting for just 
Robert Mondavi, let's have a wine-tasting for all the vintners of 
Napa Valley." Then we began to say, "You know there is an auction 
that they have in Beaune that they hold once a year for the 
benefit of the hospital." We said, "Well, why don't we make it a 
benefit?" I said, "I also know Michael Broadbent; why don't we 
have it international? I'll call him and see whether he can come 
over, and let's instead of a wine-tasting, make it a wine 
auction." She thought, "Gee that will be an excellent idea." 

So, I called Michael Broadbent on the phone and explained to 
him that we were thinking of having a wine auction here and were 
wondering if he'd be willing to come and what would he charge. 
She was willing to pay. You see, she spent about twenty-five 
thousand to thirty thousand dollars a year on a social function 
where she invited all of her friends. She brought in bands from 
New York and things like that to really do something worthwhile. 

Michael Broadbent said, "Well Bob, what kind of a function is 
it? Is it for raising money or what?" I said, "No, its a benefit 
for the hospital." He said, "Well, if its a benefit for the 
hospital, I'm willing to do it for nothing except for my tickets 
(fly me over) and my accommodation." I said, "Well, gee that's 
terrific." 

I told Pat what we should do is go to the Napa Valley 
Vintners and explain this and see if we can get the Vintners to 
support this idea. I was a little bit concerned as I knew the 
Vintners didn't want to make it a social event. The Vintners 
would realize that Pat Montandon was interested in a social deal 
rather than a wine auction. However, she was willing to spend 
twenty-five thousand or more dollars, which certainly would be 
useful for the Vintners as well. We explained it to the Vintners 
and they begrudgingly discussed it. When she left we discussed it 
again at full length. I said, "Listen. Here you have twenty-five 
thousand dollars that has been given you. Yes, it could be a 
social function, but we can get a lot of publicity nationally and 
internationally, and this thing can be built up." Well, sure 
enough they approved it, but with concern. 

Then, through some unfortunate situation (in fact Pat 
Montandon did separate from her husband), she pulled out. Then we 
didn't have twenty-five or thirty thousand dollars any more. 

I talked to my sons, Michael and Tim, I said, "You know, this 
is a golden opportunity. We have to raise twenty-five thousand. 
Even if we can't get the twenty-five thousand from other people, 
I'd like to guarantee the twenty-five thousand dollars if we need 



95 



it. But," I said, "before we do that let's try to contact a few 
other vintners to see whether they would put up five thousand 
dollars each, with the idea if it's successful then it reverts 
back to us." We were able to get not only that, but we got I 
think thirty thousand or thirty-five thousand dollars that way. 

So we then went to the Vintners and said, "Now, Pat has 
pulled out. However, we have these people who will guarantee this 
in case you need the money. And if we can't make it, fine. These 
people lose that money. Or, if it's successful it refunds back to 
these people. So then they were much happier because now they 
knew it was going to be a Napa Valley Vintners function rather 
than a Pat Montandon social function. So this is the way it went. 

In the meantime (I got a kick out of it), the year before I 
planned a trip to the Greek Islands. There were eight of us going 
on this trip. When I was gone, the Vintners put the date of the 
wine auction on that same day, I mean during my Greek trip, and I 
was so upset because I wanted to be here. I knew it should be 
very successful, and if not I wanted to personally see why, 
because I knew this could give us national and international 
recognition if done right. I created it with Pat and knew it 
should work well. I was afraid if it wasn't successful the people 
would back away for the following year. So, in the middle of my 
trip I flew to St. Helena for the wine auction. I spent that 
night at the wine auction, and I explained to the gathering the 
way this all came about. I gave credit to Pat Montandon and 
myself, how we got together to do this and how it evolved. 

It was a great success. In fact I remember Louis [P.] 
Martini was the chairman; he said, "You know, Bob, I'm amazed at 
this thing." It was very successful. It was beyond anybody's 
expectations, and we had the tremendous support of the community. 
We broke up the community into committees and they all worked, and 
worked hard, especially the women. It was a community-spirited 
thing that went through. 

Then the following year, the Vintners gave it their full 
support. Each succeeding year was better than the year before. 
But it became a big job. That's why I said, "We should have a 
manager to manage this thing. Do you realize he's going to spend 
half or two thirds of his time on the wine auction? And they 
should make a big profit." Sure enough, they finally have put a 
manager now on here, and I felt that whatever time he puts in this 
should be charged against the wine auction. In addition to that, 
the symposium that we had should be charged too as a part of the 
function of the Vintners. So that's why I was so upset when they 
didn't carry on the symposium here this year, because the man that 
we have should have been able to carry on that function as well. 

This year the auction was very successful, and I say: if we 



96 



have the right man we can get more old wines that we can auction, 
and we can make this become the most successful auction of its 
type in the world. 

Teiser: All wines are donated by the wineries? 

Mondavi: Not necessarily. We said, "O.K. for those that want to, they can 
charge their wholesale price (I mean the price that they sell to a 
distributor) if they wanted to. We donated all our wine, others 
have donated, and the majority are donating, but some of the 
smaller vintners we knew could not afford to do these things so 
therefore the auction is paying them. They put up a minimum price 
[on their wines] and then the people at the auction bid from there 
on. The small vintners are covered, you see; they get paid. It's 
been very successful. 



The Winery Tour with Margrit Biever 



Teiser: One other thing I had thought of, we have no verbal description of 
a winery tour. 

Mondavi: Oh, my wife was the one that started it. 

Teiser: I know, and so if she could tell briefly, on the tape, what the 
tour consists of 

Mondavi: You would love it! She's good at it! 

I'll tell you, we believed in this, that our tours are very 
educational. We have absolutely no secrets in our winery. We 
tell everybody. As long as other wine-makers are willing to be 
open and discuss things, we tell them everything we do. We have 
enough confidence in ourselves for the future. We continually 
learn and we can learn from other people and we do that. We are 
willing to exchange ideas with people. 

Teiser: I understand that you yourself are always interested in new ideas. 

Mondavi: Oh, definitely. We travel the world over for that. You get 
nuances of different things, why people do certain things in 
winemaking. You don't realize it at times until you get there and 
you see for yourself. Then, you have to sit down and drink wine 
with food to understand the difference not in the lab. The lab 
is fine for technical understanding, but to appreciate wine, it 
should be at the table. People don't realize that. 









oo 



T '. 



0) 

c 



jfl 



-a 

c 
o 



M 

0) 



*->i:- 








o 

M 
60 



3 
O 

4J 



97 



Now Margrit's daughter even cooks luncheons for us, the 

smaller luncheons. (We have a caterer for the big ones). I said 

to my sons, "You can never appreciate wine in a lab, you have to 

have it with lunch or dinner." Now we have that, so now they take 

advantage of that. They have lunch quite frequently and they 
taste wines with lunch so they have a better appreciation of it. 
All of this plays a part in what we're doing. 

My dear wife is the one that has created all the public 
relations. In the beginning it was Griswold. Mr. Griswold had 
worked at Charles Krug winery for us years ago. Then when I came 
over here he went to work at Inglenook for a while, we had just 
built the winery here and he came to me and said, "Bob, I know 
that you are starting a new winery here. If you see fit I'd like 
to work with you when the company's very small. I would be 
happy to take the tours in the beginning." I said, "Gee, fine 
Griz, I think that would be swell." 

So, as soon as we opened up in I think it was March or April 
of 1967, we had only some white wine and rosb ready. He came over 
and he took tours. He said, "I'll do it for about six months, no 
more than a year," he said, "until you can get started." Well I 
was so busy that a year went by, almost a year and a half. He 
then hired Margrit Biever. Then, after being there for about a 
year or more he came to me and said, "Bob, remember I told you I 
was going to only work a few months on this. I don't want the 
full responsibility of this. I would like to have you bring 
someone in who could take charge." Well I didn't get anyone. 
Finally, he came up to me about six months later and said, "Bob, I 
have just the person for you." I said, "Fine, who is it?" "It's 
Margrit Biever." I said, "Margrit Biever?" He said, "Yes. You 
know, she understands your philosophy. She understands what you 
want to do, the graciousness of what you have and all. She will 
be ideal for you." I said, "Are you sure?" I discussed this 
further. He said, "Bob without a doubt." I said, "Okay. Let me 
talk to her." 

I talked to her and I said, "You know Griswold gave you a 
high recommendation. He felt you were ideal, that your philosophy 
and mine were the same, and that you would be ideal for this 
position." She said, "Well, I'm sorry. I'm honored, but frankly 
I don't think I'm qualified to run the retail room and the tours." 
I said, "Well, Griswold was quite convinced that you were." She 
said, "Well, I appreciate the offer but I'm not qualified." I 
couldn't talk her into it. 

Then Griswold came to me and said, "Bab, would you mind if I 
talked to Margrit?" I said, "No, fine." So he made a deal with 
Margrit. You know in European countries the women always worked 
with the husbands, and she never ran men. Here she had two or 
three, I forgot how many, men who are tour guides. 



98 



Griswold said, "I'll handle the tour guides for one year. 
You come in and do the receiving and little by little I'll 
transfer the responsibility." That's exactly what took place, and 
in a short little while she began to realize she could do 
everything and make it work well. She carried that on and 
developed many new PR ideas up until four years ago when we 
brought Harvey Posert in. Then he took over part of the public 
relations responsibility. Margrit became my wife. My wife began 
to do the special events only, which was a full-time job. She did 
the jazz festivals, the cooking classes, the Great Chefs of France 
and of America, the art shows, plus all the other special events. 
She's the one that created those things. So, I thought she should 
tell her story, and so it will be good for you to talk with her. 

[The interview continued in one of the winery reception rooms.] 
Teiser: You came to this winery in 1967 just shortly after it started? 

Biever: I guess I was one of the first woman tour guides in Napa Valley 

when I worked for Krug from 1964 to 1966. Then I joined the Robert 
Mondavi organization in 1967 when it was a very young winery. The 
first new winery*, as you know, built after Prohibition. It was 
that rainy year of '67, and there were three of us. It took three 
of us because one had to stay back while one went on tour, and the 
third one had to come in on our days off. [laughs] 

We were often wondering, "Would there be a day when nobody 
[no visitors] would come?" But the day never happened. The 
minimum we had were three persons. We were somewhat historical 
because we served rose, our Camay Rose, and our Riesling, which 
was a Sylvaner Riesling. These are wines which we don't have 
any more. Then, the Fume Blanc was introduced as the first dry 
Sauvignon Blanc with wood aging. So, therefore, that became one 
of the big innovations and successes. 

But here we were around the fire in the fireplace, counting 
those few little people that came in. [laughs] Today, as you have 
seen, Ruth, we have probably on a Monday a thousand visitors, and 
we can't accommodate everybody that would like to come and see the 
winery . 

Teiser: On a summer weekend, how many a day? 

Biever: Well, we have to limit it to about twelve, fourteen hundred, 
because physically there just isn't any place to go any more. 

Teiser: You have some tour busses 

Biever: We accept tour busses. Busses to us in a way are easy because 
they bring less cars and it's sort of a compact idea of people 



*In the Napa Valley. 



99 



coming and departing. We love everybody but there just isn't 
enough room, [laughs] It's just sometimes we don't know where to 
go, but it is wonderful this wine interest in our nation. 

Teiser: Could you describe when a group arrives what you do? 

Biever: Yes, we greet them and we will tell them at what point the next 
tour is leaving never making them wait more than ten to fifteen 
minutes. 

Teiser: Where do they wait? 

Biever: They wait all in the reception room that you have seen because now 
the weather is getting a little cool. Or, they may go under the 
arch, sit on the bench, take a few pictures, and find other people 
to talk with until the tour leaves. 

Our tour guides are a very dedicated group of young people 
that have sometimes taken a rest in their careers. Like, they may 
have finished school, they have a degree they may even have an 
advanced degree and they don't quite want to go into something 
yet. So they say, "We want to learn about wine," and maybe for a 
year or two they become tour guides here. Many of our people have 
then stayed because the life was nice. There is a character, 
quality of life, when you live in the vineyards, that is good. 
They have stayed and they have been tour guides with us for two, 
three, four years now. 

They are knowledgeable because there is like a fire burning 
in there, and if you don't know soon everything that you can 
possibly accrue of winemaking, it's like water seeking its own 
level you are suffocated. They're all very, very anxious to know 
and have the fire. We think they are very knowledgeable, and they 
give a tour that's based on information and education. 

Teiser: Do they speak before they go out into the winery? 

Biever: Yes, they welcome everybody. We give a little of the history from 
the beginning of Robert Mondavi's family arriving from Italy in 
1906. Living in Minnesota in the iron mines. To Cesar e's 
development, being at some point a sort of an entrepreneur, and 
being picked by the Italian community up there in this cold, iron- 
mine country of Minnesota, to come to California every year and 
purchase the grapes from which then the Italians made their wine. 
Through the time that he brought his family here in 1923, and then 
after repeal when he go involved in Sunny St. Helena. In '43 the 
family bought Charles Krug. The rise, the -energy that they put 
into Charles Krug making it quite successful. Then, Cesare died 
in 1959, and to the differences of ideas between the brothers to 
the separation in 1966. Bob feeling that he had enough time, 
enough energy, the know-how, and three children that wanted to 



100 



follow his footsteps, that he could start anew. 

From then on we tell a little bit about the winery as being 
one of the most modern wineries at the time. Now of course many 
more have come in, with technology and tradition playing a role. 

We talk about the vineyards. Our own, how we have slowly 
acquired them, and that we now have seven hundred acres around the 
winery. This is the winery with the most acreage contiguous to 
the winery in Napa Valley. And the other vineyard near the 
Oakville Crossroad, where we have another five hundred and eighty 
acres. 

Then we talk about Napa Valley as a prime region for grape 
growing. The climatic conditions, the zones from Carneros to 
Calistoga, talk about micro-climate the hill versus the river, 
what the fog from the Pacific does, the balance of cold and warm 
that we do not need to irrigate, why. Obviously there is a lot of 
ground water, the root of the grape is deep. The life of the 
grape, how it was brought from the old country. 

Then the phylloxera history, the grafting, what has been done 
in grafting. The clone selecting. The interest in vineyards now. 
Soils, the planting of the grape, the life of the grape. The work 
in the vineyards from the harvest going backwards to the pruning, 
to the plowing of the soil. 

After that we will stop as you can see this little group 
here is stopping by a vine. We will show them the vine. We want 
to familiarize them with the vine. We also bring up such things 
as the dangers the pests and the frosts. Why we have so many 
frost protection methods and what is best what we feel is best. 
Where it's necessary and where it isn't and so forth. 

Then we get somehow by the crusher. We now discuss the 
picking of the grapes. Manual, about eighty percent to about 
twenty percent with the machine. We tell them about the labor 
situation, that we have about seventy percent indigenous (mostly 
Mexican) labor in the fields, as you well know. Besides some 
supervisory people, the rest is one hundred percent Mexican. And 
it's a very important part to be able to have these very trained 
and good, good people in the fields. Then, during harvests, we 
had about thirty percent of migrant labor or labor that is not 
used all year round. 

We explain the crushing, we explain how we crush the grapes 
with the crusher. White versus red and machine-picked versus 
hand-picked. The whole story kind of while we show how the stems 
are ejected and the recycling of the stems; and in some cases in 
the Pinot noir, the readjoining the stems to the must. That's to 
give the wine a little more tannic character; the green tannin of 



101 



the stems gives it more liveliness. That is explained there. 

Then we proceed into the cellars where we talk about 
fermentation. Again, quite a chapter on the whites. How the 
stainless-steel tanks have the temperature control due to the 
lining where the glycol can circulate, which is in turn controlled 
by a Hewlett-Packard computer (it's like having a baby-sitter). 
We used to stay a little bit away from telling too much about the 
technical control because you take away the romance of the little 
old wine-maker, [laughs] But, we all feel everybody has grown up 
today, and therefore, it is fully discussed how the control works 
on the temperature. We talk about how long the skins are retained 
with the must, I mean with the juice, in the beginning from six to 
maybe twenty hours, depending on whether they are Chardonnay's or 
lighter wines. And also the states of the grapes and so forth. 

Then we go into the red fermentation. Fermentation is 
discussed in this area, and the rotating tanks where we do a lot of 
the fermentation of the reds are explained. Keeping the skins in 
contact with the juice for the extraction of the color pigment of 
the tannin and the body. What you gain from that. The 
temperature again, higher more rapid violent fermentation. 

Then we go on to clarification and explain that, again, it's 
an individual situation. You may want your sedimentation on 
racking. On the other hand you may want to add something like, I 
think, bentonite. We used to use a centrifuge; not so much 
any more it is used for some wines and musts. We talk then about 
the fining of the wines with the egg whites. All our reds are 
fined with fresh egg whites. 

By that time we pass by the bottling. We're not quite 
chronological. We come by the bottling first. That's totally 
visual. You just have to see and that's that. We tell them, 
however, that it's done under air pressure for sanitary reasons. 
From there we go into one of our many cellars. Of course, since 
we have over thirty thousand French wood barrels, ninety-nine 
percent French out of thirty thousand, we stop there to explain 
the importance of wood for Robert Mondavi, and what wood does. We 
also take them right to the barrels where wines are fermented in 
the barrels such as the reserve Chardonnay and some of the 
regular Chardonnay, part of the regular Fumfe Blanc, the reserve 
Fume Blanc. So they can really see, especially now, that the 
action (fermentation) is still going on. Whatever goes on in the 
cellars is explained, be it topping, be it blending. 

I think a living cellar for a tour, to' me is a must. When I 
leave a cellar, the element of excitement, of work as work, is 
lost. You can also bring in the fact that now we have several 
women at work in the cellars. Historically that's a big change. 



102 



After that, what happens after who blends, who thinks, and 
we explain the lab. What could happen. The big decisions. The 
brain where you have to know when is it bottled? Is it right? 
The tasting of it, everything goes through the human palate, I 
mean it's all an art it's not simply a craft. The importance of 
the art versus only a craft. 

By that time we then come out, and now we come in for 
tasting. Also a time for questions. Questions are all the time, 
but sometimes in the tasting room there is a more intimate 
feeling, where the guide is right in front of you. Then we taste 
very thoroughly about three wines, telling our guests how to 
taste, what to look for in wine. The three tasting steps: the 
visual, then of course the bouquet, the smell, and finally how to 
appreciate the wine by not just swallowing it the first time, but 
give the taste buds the chance to appreciate it. 



Transcriber: Ernie Galvan 
Final Typist: Richard Shapiro 



102a 



Fane Blanc - When we started the Robert Mondavi Winery in 1966 it was 
our policy to buy all of the grapes that the growrs may have had and 
we had several growers who had Sauvignon Blanc. We realized that the 
Sauvignon Blanc was not well accepted by the American people. Most 
of the Sauvignon Blanc wines being produced were very sweet or very 
coarse and not accepted. 

I realized we had to create a new style of wine and I didn't want to 
call it Sauvignon Blanc, we tried hard to select a proprietary name 
but were unable to think of a good one I therefore suggested the 
name Fume Blanc. Blanc Fume is the French name for the Sauvignon 
Blanc produced in the Loire Valley. By reversing the words I felt 
it was more harmonious for the American people. 

I realized when we created the Chenin Blanc at Charles Krug the wine 
had approximately 1.57 to 27o sugar. We did not want to duplicate this 
so made our wine very dry and by fermenting the wine cold and ag ing 
it in the barrel we could produce a wine that had its own individual 
character. 

When this wine was shipped to the market it was an instant success 
and has been ever since. It has also been accepted by many other 
winemakers who have produced their own version of Fume Blanc. 

I do think it is a wine of distinctive character and can be sold at 
a reasonable price in the national and international markets. 

The only thing I did not do was to trademark the name Fume Blanc in 
the beginning, because immediately after the acceptance of the wine 
in the market other winemakers began using the name. Now it is an 
accepted name for the production of dry Sauvignon Blanc. 



Added by Robert Mondavi 

Robert Mondavi y . 100 , 

in March 1986 

March, 1986 



103 



TAPE GUIDE Robert Mondavi 



Interview 1: 
tape 1, 
tape 1, 
tape 2, 
tape 2, 


April 17, 
side A 
side B 
side A 
side B 


1984 



Interview 2: April 19, 1984 

tape 3, side A 

tape 3, side B 

tape 4, side A 

Interview 3: April 20, 1984 

tape 4, side B 

tape 5, side A 

insert from tape 7, side A [10/15/84] 

tape 5, side B 

tape 6, side A [side B not recorded] 

Interview 4: October 15, 1984 

tape 7, side A [side B not recorded] 



1 

10 
21 
29 



30 
41 
50 



59 
68 
74 
81 
91 



92 



104 
INDEX -- Robert Mondavi 

Abruzzini, Fred, 31 

Acampo Winery and Distillery, 6, 9, 17 
Adams, Clifford S. (Cliff), 49 
Alexander, Paul, 12, 13, 14-15, 69 
Alioto, Joseph L. (Joe), 37, 39 
Antinori, Piero, 42 

B. V. See Beaulieu Vineyard 
Bank of America, 12, 37, 41 
Barengo, Dino, 9 

Barengo family, 2 

Beard, James (Jimmy), 26, 27 

Beaulieu Vineyard, 10, 11, 20, 27, 28, 31, 70, 71, 72 

Bergier, Roger, 51 

Beringer Brothers, Inc. 10, 20, 28, 31 

Beroldo, Fred, 12-13 

Beroldo, Rena Riorda (Mrs. Fred), 12-13 

Biever, Margrit (second Mrs. Robert Mondavi), 50, 96-102 

blending, 53 

Bocuse, Paul, 51 

Boffa, Pio, 43 

Borger, Marcia Mondavi (Marcie), 40-41, 48-49, 57, 79-80, 81, 83-84, 87 

Bradford winery, 9 

Brennan, Ella, 90-91 

Broadbent, Michael, 25, 94 

Brunetti family, 1 

C. K. label, 19, 30, 36 
California State Fair, 20 
Calistoga viticutural area, 75, 76 
Carneros viticultural area, 47, 52 
Cella, J. B., (John B.), 70 
Cella family, 13, 16 

Cellini, Arthur (Archie) 9 

Charles Krug label, 19 

Chateau Montelena, 49 

Cherokee Vineyard Association, 59 

Christian Brothers winery, 31 

Conn Valley viticultural area, 47, 73 

cooperage, 23-25, 42, 43, 47-48, 52, 62, 71, 101 

Cottin, Philippe, 82, 83, 86 

Cristiani, Henry, 27 

Crocker First National Bank, 14-15 

de Pins, Helene de Latour, 72 

Daniel, John, Jr., 10, 31, 69-70, 93 

Dean, Malette, 26 

Delapenna, R. U. 18-19, 26 

Dora, Miklos (Mickey), 83 

Enriques, Hilary J. (Vic), 9 

Fabrini, Aldo, 31 

Felice family, 60 

Ferguson, Allen, 44-46 

Ferroggiaro, Fred, 37, 39 

Flagroni, Larry, 91 

Freese, Phil, 78 



105 



Gallo, E. and J. Winery, 13 
Gazzara , Joe 
Gerard, Michel, 51 
Gomberg, Louis (Lou), 31 
Gould, Frank (Paco), 26-27 
Grgich, Miljenko (Mike), 49 
Grgich Hills Cellar, 49 

Griswold, , 97-98 

grower relations, 27, 44, 47, 56, 72- 

Grubb, Patrick, 66 

Guild [Wineries and Distilleries], 40 

Gundert , J. B. , 6 

Hall, Bill, 92 

Hart, Ina, 41 

Hart, William (Bill), 41 

Holmes, Fred, 39, 41, 44, 45, 64 

imported wines, 33-34, 35, 68, 76, 92 

Inglenook Vineyard, 10, 11, 20, 28, 31, 59, 69, 70, 97 

Johnson, Hugh, 25 

Krug, Charles, Winery, 12-41, 42, 50, 71-72, 89, 97, 98, 99 

Lane, Melvin B. (Mel), 63 

Lane, William (Bill), 63-64 

Larkmead Vineyards, 10 

Lodi viticultural area, 61 

Long, Zelma, 49 

malo-lactic fermentation, 73 

marketing orders, 35. See also Wine Advisory Board and Winegrowers 

of California 

Martini, Louis M., 69, 70, 71 
Martini, Louis M., winery, 28 
Martini, Louis P. 95 
May, Cliff, 64-65 
McDonald, Gordon, 44-46 
McKesson & Robbins, 26 
Mercier, Andre, 65 
Mirassou, Edmund A., 31 
Mirassou family, 40, 41 
Mirassou Vineyards, 40 
Moet et Chandon, 64-65 
Moffitt, James K., 12, 14-15, 16 
Molson Companies, 44 
Mondavi, C. & Sons, 17-41 passim, 46, 59-60, 62, 70, 79. 

See also Krug, Charles, Winery 
Mondavi, Cesare, 1-23, 30, 34, 36, 37, 99 
Mondavi, Helen (sister of Robert Mondavi), 19 
Mondavi, Marcia (Marcie). See Borger, Marcia Mondavi 
Mondavi, Marjorie Declusin (first Mrs. Robert Mondavi), 27, 40-41 
Mondavi, Mary (sister of Robert Mondavi), 19 
Mondavi, Michael (Mike), 31, 37, 39-41, 44, 48, 79-82, 94-95 
Mondavi, Peter, 2, 7-8, 9, 13, 14-15, 19, 23, 25, 36-37, 39, 40 
Mondavi, Robert Michael. See Mondavi, Michael 
Mondavi, Robert, Winery. See Robert Mondavi Winery 
Mondavi, Rosa Grassi (Mrs .~C~esare) , 1, 5, 14, 19, 22, 36-39 
Mondavi, Timothy J. (Tim), 31, 40-41, 48, 49, 56, 63, 77, 80-81, 86, 87 

94-95 
Montandon, Pat, 93-95 



106 



Montcalm Vintners, 59 

Napa Valley, passim 

Napa Valley Technical Group, 28 

Napa Valley Vintners, 68-69, 92-93, 94-95 

Napa Valley Wine Auction, 93-96 

Napa Valley Wine Symposium, 92-93, 95 

Napa Wine Company, 70 

Oakville label, 59 

Oakville viticultural area, 52, 75, 75, 76 

Oakville Winery, 58-59 

Ogden, Bradley, 91 

"Opus One" Cabernet Sauvignon, 82-90 

Pate, Susan, 87 

Peters, Leon, 41 

Peters, Pete, 41 

Peynaud, Emil, 42 

Pio Cesare winery, Italy, 43 

Pope Valley viticultural area, 47, 73 

Poser t, Harvey, 98 

premium wines public relations program, 31-32 

presses, 52 

Prohibition, 1-2, 8, 20, 21 

Prudhomme, Paul, 91 

Puck, Wolfgang, 91 

Rainier Brewery, 44-46, 58, 65 

Ramona, Gary, 49, 79, 92 

Ray, Cyril, 25 

redwood tanks, 24 

restaurants, wine in, 27, 29 

Riorda, Jack, 8-10, 14, 22 

Robert Mondavi Winery, 28, 30, 39-102 

Robert Mondavi Winery, Woodbridge facility, 30, 59-63, 77 

Roma Wine Company, 13, 70 

Romano, Lawrence (Larry), 43 

Rothschild, Philippe de, 82-88 

Schoch, Ivan, 39, 41, 44, 45 

Serlis, Harry, 85 

shipping grapes, 2-5, 6, 8, 17-18, 22 

Silva, Mike, 93 

Simi Winery, 49 

Sionneau, Lucien, 86-87 

Stralla, Louis, 16, 69, 70 

Sunny Hill Winery, 8, 10. See also Sunny St. Helena Winery 

Sunny St. Helena Winery, 8-11, 12-13, 18, 22, 30, 99 

Sunset Magazine headquarters, 63-64 

Tchelistcheff , Andre", 27, 28, 42, 71-72 

Timothy, Brother, 31 

University of California, 21 

University of California, Davis, 35, 48, 79 

Valley Foundry and Machine Works, 41 

Van Loben Sels, Wilfred E. (Bud), 58 

Warner, Brad, 49 

Waters, Alice, 91 

Williams, Charles (Charlie), 77 

Wine Advisory Board, 31-32 

Wine Institute, 30-31, 34, 63, 70, 82, 85 



107 



wine and food societies, 79 
Winegrowers of California, 31, 33 



Grapes Mentioned in the Interview 

Alicante Bouschet, 4 

Cabernet Sauvignon, 18, 21, 47, 48, 52, 53, 75, 76, 82 

Cabernet franc, 48 

Carignane, 4 

Chardonnay, 18, 21, 47, 48, 52, 53, 76 

Camay, 76 

Merlot, 48 

Muscat, 2, 4 

Petit Sirah, 76 

Pinot noir, 21, 47, 48, 52, 53, 76 

Riesling, 18, 21, 53 

Sauvignon blanc, 21, 47, 53, 76, 77 

Semillon, 76 

Thompson Seedless, 4 

Zinfandel 2, 4, 76 

Wines Mentioned in the Interview 

Barbera, 24 

burgundy, 20 

Cabernet Sauvignon, 20, 23, 24, 34, 53, 54, 82-90, 101 

Cabernet Franc, 53, 86 

chablis, 20 

Chardonnay, 20, 3, 24, 34, 53, 54, 101 

Chenin Blanc, 54 

Fume Blanc. See Sauvignon Blanc 

Camay, 20, 537~5~4 

Camay Rose, 20, 98 

Johannisberg Riesling, 34 

Merlot, 53, 86 

Pinot Noir, 20, 23, 24, 34, 53, 54, 71, 100-101 

Riesling, 20, 23, 24, 34 

sauterne, 20 

Sauvignon Blanc, 34, 53, 54, 98 

Semillon, 53 

Sylvaner Riesling, 98 

Traminer, 20 

"Vintage Red," 60-62, 77 

"Vintage Rose," 60-62, 77 

"Vintage White," 60-62, 77 

Zinfandel, 20, 24, 53, 54 



Ruth Teiser 



Born in Portland, Oregon; came to the Bay 

Area in 1932 and has lived here ever since. 
Stanford University, B.A. , M.A. in English; 

further graduate work in Western history. 
Newspaper and magazine writer in San Francisco 

since 1943, writing on local history and 

business and social life of the Bay Area. 
Book reviewer for the San Francisco Chronicle, 

1943-1974. 
Co-author of Winemaking in California, a 

history, 1982. 
An interviewer-editor in the Regional Oral 

History Office since 1965.