Skip to main content

Full text of "Renovation of an old apple orchard"

See other formats


=> 


Sn emtin tat tinea a a PROBE TE 
anaes 
aA aE! 


ALBERT R. MANN 
LIBRARY 


NEw YorK STATE COLLEGES 
OF 
AGRICULTURE AND HoME ECoNomICcs 


AT 


CORNELL UNIVERSITY 


Cornell University Library 
SB 363.W3 


Renovation of an old ap 


It 


ple orchard. 


Cornell University 


Library 


The original of this book is in 
the Cornell University Library. 


There are no known copyright restrictions in 
the United States on the use of the text. 


http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924003408691 


RENOVATION OF AN OLD APPLE ORCHARD. 


ah leaned 


BY 
f 
‘ 


shee 


ee 
RAYMOND §S, WASHBURN. 


1497 


HERESY 


JUNE 1912. 


Coy 


S58 


364 
3 / 


327898 


OUTLINE. 


I. INTRODUCTION. 
II, CULTIVATION. 
III. PRUNING. 
a. REMOVING EXCESS OF TREES. 
b. SHAPING AND THINNING THE INDIVIDUAL TRIE, 
¢. IMPROVING THE SANITARY CONDITION OF THE ORCHARD. 
IV. DRAINAGE. 
Vv. FERTILIZATION . 
e&. RESULTS FROM USE OF FERTILIZERS. 
bh. KINDS OF FERTILIZERS. 
©. INDICATIONS OF NEED OF FERTILIZER, 
VI. SPRAYING, 
&. INSECTS AND FUNGOUS DISEASES. 
b. OUTLINE FOR SPRAYING THE APPLE ORCHARD. 
VII. COST OF RENOVATION. 
VIIT. PROFITS FROM RENOVATION, 


IX, SUMMARY. 


RENOVATION OF AN OLD APPLE ORCHARD. 


C cttettnalnatiadicdtnatthersen ian nmeatied 


Introduction. 


Throughout New York State there are many neglected 
orchards ranginy in size from a few trees to several acres. 
These trees were planted in the early days mainly as a 
home source of supply and little thought end attention 
was given them as a commercial enterprise. They grew 
and produced an abundance of fruit and, since they were 
not a source of income, were naturally neglected. A. 
majority of them were set too thick and formed tall high- 
headed trees which were hard te prune and spray. Later 
when the multitude of insect and fungous diseases became 
prevelent and scientists knew little of their contrel, 
the orchard owner beceme discouraged and allowed his once 
productive trees to deteriorate still further. 

Now conditions have chenged and there is a large 
end growing demand for choice fruit. To meet this demand 
thousands of ecres of orchards have been planted but it 


will be some years before these young orchards will come 


inte bearing. 


The question is whether it will be profitable to re- 
new these old orchards and make them a source of income 
while the new trees are growing and developing. The ans- 


wer is that it will, es has been demonstrated in many ne- 


glected orchards cf this state. 


Cultivation. 


There ere many methods of apple orchard culture and 
individual growers, as well as scientific pomologists, 
have not yet decided on a universal standard of what the 
best orchard culture should be. Perhaps it would be well 
to briefly compare the different methods, 


(1) The Continuous Clean Culture Method. By this ne- 


thod the lend is plowed in the spring and cultivation con- 
tinued throughout the growing season until late autumn 
when cultivation ceases and the soil is allowed to lie 
undisturbed and uncovered until the next spring when the 
process is repeated. This method is generally if not sl- 
weys found to be unsuccessful because of the severe wash- 
ing and loss of soil due to rains. 


(2) The Cover-Crop Method. This method consists in 


plowing and disking the ground as early in the spring as 
the soil will permit. Cultivetion is continued until the 
niddle of July, when some cever crop is sow and allowed 
to remein for the remainder of the season. 

(3) The Sod Culture Method. This method consists 
in allewing the grass to grow end form 4 sod over the en- 
tire surface of the orchard, except a circular area of 
ground under each individual tree which is dug up and kept 
mellow during the growing season. The grass is mowed and 


allowed to remain where it falls. 


-5- 


(4) The Sod Mulch Method. By this method the grase 
is allowed to grow and form a sod ever the entire surface 
of the orchard. Instead of speding end cultivatirg cir- 
cular areas about each tree, these spaces ere mulched with 
straw. The grass is also mowed et intervals and used to 
maintein the mulch about the trees. This method is well 
adapted to orchards on steep slopes where cultivation 
would result in severe loss through washing of the soil. 

These last three methods of orchard culture were prac-= 
ticed st the Ohic Experiment Station with the result that 
the trees made a greeter annual growth in the cover=crop 
plot than in the sod-culture plot, but not as great as in 
the sod=mulch plot. 

On the sodemuich plot there were produced 172 apples 
weighing 55,5 lbs; on the cover-crep plot, 70 epples, 
weighing 21 lbs; end on the sod-culture plot, 29 apples 
weighirg 7 lbs. Thus showing a decided advantage in 
favor of the sod-mulch, 

In two experiments conducted by the Geneve Experiment 
Stetion, as to whether the apple does better under tillage or 
in soc, the results were somewhat different from thoce 
found at the Ohio Station. This experiment was begun in 
1903 in the orchard of Mr, W. D. Auchter, near Rochester, 
New York, The orchard consisted of nine end one-helf acres 
of Baldwin trees, set 40 feet epart each way. On onewhelf 


of this orcherd, or 118 trees, the sod=mulch treatment 


was tried. On the remainder, or 121 trees, the tillage 
and annuel cover-crop method was practiced, The trees in 
the two experiments received the same care and treatment 
as to spraying, pruning and all orcherd operations except 
soil treatment. 


Results of the two methods employed. The average yield 


on the sod=plet for five years was 72.9 barrels per acre, 
while that of the tilled plot was 109.2 barrels, or a dif- 
ference of 36.3 bbls. in faver of the tilled plot. It is 
also interesting to note that the tilled trees yearly in- 
creased their bearing capacity; and that on the other. hand 
the sed-mulch trees gradually decreased in yield of fruit. 

During the entire experiment the fruit on the sod= 
mulch plot matured one to three weeks earlier than on the 
tilled plot. 

The keeping quality of the tilled apples was much sup- 
erier to that of the sod-mulched apples, those from the 
tilled plot keeping 4 weeks longer then from the sod=-plot,. 

The fruit from the sodemulch plot was more highly 
colored. However, in eating quality, the tilled apples 
were superior to the sod=mulched product. The tissues of 
fruit from the tilled plot was turgid and crisp while in 
the epples from the sod-mulch plet there was a tendency to 
dryness and meatiness. 

Trees in sod showed abnormalities in foliage, branches 
end rocts. The foliage on the tilled trees was a dark, 


rich green color while on sod it was a yellow color. The 


leaves on the tilled trees were nuch larger, came out ear- 
lier and remeined on the trees later than on sodded trees. 
The roots of sodded trees came to the surface of the ground; 
in tilled trees there were more roots and they grew deeper. 

The average cost per acre, not including harvesting, 
was $17.92 for the sod; end $24.47 for tillage giving a 
difference of $6.55 in favor of the sod. 

In summing up the resulta of this experiment, Professer 
Hedrick of the Geneva Station says thet 

Tillage is better than sod for the apple since there 
is a larger moisture supply in the tilled plot and there- 
fore e greater food supply. There is more humus in the 
tilled plot and it is warmer end better serated. Also 
there are more beneficial micro-organisms in tilled than 
in other soils. 

From these results it would seem that tillage and cover- 
crops were best for the average orchard and especially so 
in case of old, neglected trees, since with neglected trees it 
is important thet they should make a large and rapid growth 


of new wood. 


Pruning. 


In a majority ef neglected orchards the trees are 
too closely planted. The early growers failed to see the 
importance of plenty of room in which the trees could 
grow and develop, end as a result we of to-day see the 
effect of their failure te recognize this very important 
principle. When the greater pert of the orchards in New 
York State were planted, about 40 years ago, there was a 
universal tendency to plant too closely. On 43 per cent 
of the aree planted before 1880, the trees are 30 x 30 feet 
or less; 82 per cent sre 35 x 35 feet or less. Only 18 
per cent are over 35 x 35 feet. The larger growing vari- 
eties like Baldwin, Rhode Island, and Northern Spy will 
eventuelly require 40 feet between trees. With the small- 
er growing varieties, like Transparent, Oldenburg, Wealthy 
and McIntosh, 30 feet may be sufficient. If then the 
trees in these old orchards are too closely planted, the 
first and perhaps the most impertent factor in renovation 
is to remove the excess of trees. 

The first step then is to determine if the trees ere 
properly spaced. If they are too closely planted, the ef- 
fect shows up in the healthfulness and productivenees of 
the tree. According to deta taken from Cornell bulletin 
226, the greater the number of trees per ecre, the less 


the yield. 


The average yield for four yeers of orchards where 
the trees were not over 30 x 30 feet separt was 186 bushels; 
for those between 30 x 30 and 35 x 35 feet, 222 bushels; 
for those over 35 x 35 feet, 229 bushels. Some of the 
more striking indications of close planting may be seen 
in the long armed upright growth with scarcely any foliage 
on the lower branches. As the trees gradually grow to- 
gether at the top, the sunlight is shut off, the lower 
limbs begin to bear inferior, poorly colered fruit and 
finelly die. 

Now if it is true that only the upper branches bear 
good fruit, it can be readily seen that there ie a great 
loss in bearing surface on these closely planted trees, on- 
ly the top area bearing fruit, while in well-rounded, pro- 
perly pruned trees, planted at the correct distance, the 
bearing surface would be at least three times as great. 

If the treee are found to be too closely planted, 
and some must be removed, it ic well to follow some re= 
gular plan, so es to retain the conformity of the orchard, 
When the trees are planted in squares, ss is generally the 
case, in old orchards, every alternate tree in the row may 
be removed. This is accomplished by removing every se- 
cond rew diegonally. If the squares between the trees 
were originally 25 x 25 feet, they will, after removing 
every alternate tree in the row, then be 35.2 x 35.3 feet. 


If originally they were 30 x 30 feet, they will now be 


oO 
ao a a ar a a rn Cr ay an ae aan 


ex xX X a 


xe KK @ KK KOK eX A 
oxexk Ke xX © XK © XG 
EUR eeeaere os a 


*xx«xexK KK xXK* KO #8 


Kee x xX KX Oe KXXARAP 


<x ~ @ XK xX © 


x * x © xX 
ovacant Spaces 


® 
© 
~ 
S 


x @ 
ox xk xX xX Kx © ® 


Ke xe kK eK eK OK KX 

a a re > <i> Ga Ge a Ce Gy 

exxXx KX EKA 

ae a ae a ae a Gm a ee 


ex *oxXK «ORK Ke 


x x 
x Kx © xX xX 


Hh 12 13 


x Thrifty Trees 


eUnh ealthy Trees 


2165 


42.4 x 42.4 feet. So by removing one-half of the trees, 
it does not follow, as is commonly supposed, that the 
trees will be twice as far apart. 

Before removing any trees, it is desirable to make 
& mep of the orchard and locate upon it by a particular 
sign all inferior, weak trees, ell vacant spaces by an- 
ether sign, and all desirable trees by another. If this 
is done, one can determine at e glance whether to re= 
move the first diagonal row or the second, starting with 
the diagonal row containing the greater number of vacan- 
cies and undesirable trees. 

In tne following diagram, the even rows show 20 poor 
trees and J vacant spaca#, while the odd rows show 12 poor 
trees and 3 vacant spaces. In this case, it is advisable 
to remove the even diagonal rows, since they include 27 
poor trees and vacant spaces out of a total of 42, The 
question often arises as to whether the trees adjacent to 
the vacancies should be removed. It is generally ed- 
visable to remove such trees, since each one so situated 


is likely to crowd one side of thpee other trees, 


Shaping and Thinning the Individual Trees. 


Old neglected trees are almost invariebly unsymetri- 
cal and too high, making it almost impossible to spray pro- 
perly and more expensive to gather fruit on these high 
branches. To be an intelligent pruner, one should know 
something of plant physiolegy, end the habit of growth 
of the apple tree. He should know the effects produced 
by pruning et different seasons of the year, how to make 
a cut thet will heal most readily, and the influence of 
pruning on the fruit-besring habit of the tree. Pruning 
during the dormant season incites wood growth, while 
pruning during the growing season promotes fruitfulness,. 
The first thing to be done is to remove all dead and dy=- 
ing wood, then the pruner can see exactly what he has to 
work with. A tree that is over 30 feet in height may be 
shortened to 15 or 20 feet and one between 25 and 30 feet 
eften may be cut back to about 15 or 18 feet. In heading 
back the upright branches, the cut is usually made just 
above a side branch that points outward. This tends to 
make the tree more spreeding in habit. 

The severity of heading in will depend largely upon 
the vigor of the tree. Nothing will start e tree inte 
renewed vigor like severe pruning during the dormant sea- 
son, The cutting-back, therefore, should be more severe 
with weakened trees. When a tree is severely headed back 
@ rank growth in the form of water=-sprouts spring out from 


the buds lower down on the trunk, and from these water- 


wee 


sprouts an entirely new head may be formed. It is den- 
gerous, however, to heed back the entire tree the same 
season since the tree's source of carbohydrate food, su- 
gare, starches, etc., is obtained through the action of 
sunlight on these substences which are stored in the leaves 
and therefore if the entire leaf surface is removed et one 
cutting the tree would probably die. For this reason, it 
is best to distribute the work of renewal over two or three 
seasons, removing only a portion of the top each year, 

The character of the cut has a marked influence on 
the healing process. All feod material capable of healing a 
wound is taking a dewnward course through the inner bark 
and to heal well a wound should be in a position to inter- 
cept this downward flow of sap from the foliage higher up. 
When a limb is to be removed, it should be cut close to 
the body of the tree and parallel with it. If this is done, 
the tree will be eble to heal quite large wounds before 
decay sets in. All wounds over re inches in diameter should 
be painted with a good lead paint, to which has been added 
a little lemp black, so that the spots will be less conspi- 


CucUus. 


Improvement of the Sanitary Condition of the Orchard. 


Much can be done to prevent the spread of fungous 
diseases by thoreughly cleaning up and burning old rubbish 
and dead limbs. It is also advisable to scrap dow the 


bark with a scraper or dull hoe, removing all moss, reugh 


~-14= 


bark and lichens, thereby destroying insects and fungi. 
All cavities or hollows in body or branches gradually en- 
larging through decay should be carefully cleaned out, 


sprayed inside with Berdean mixture and filled with Port- 


land cement, 


@1 5 


Drainage. 


Good drainage, natural or artificial, is fundamental 
to the best welfare of the secher as The need of drainage 
may not be apparent while the trees are young, but as they 
get older aul the roots penetivte Lato poorly drained and 
poorly aerated soil, the trees are damaged and in many 
cases killed. 

In Walworth township, Wayne Co., 54 orchards, aggre- 
gating 232 acres are reported as in need of drainage. The 
average yleld of these 54 orchards in 1902 was 203 bushels, 
42 bushels below the average of the other orchards in the 
township. 

Drainage is important for the following reasons: 

(1) Drainage removes the excess of water, thus 
improving the physical condition of the soil, making it 
less compact and impervious, and improving its tilth which 
is important fer proper and intensive cultivation. 

(2) Drainage reduces winter injury, to the roots. 
The freezing of large amounts of water in the roots cause 
them to winter kill. 

(3) Drainage promotes proper air circulation 
in the soil which is necessary to the proper growth of »ve- 
neficial soil organisms and hinders the growth of many un- 
desirable organisms, This growth of soil bacteria is 
very important since they are vitally related to the sup~ 
ply of plant food in the soil. It is through their action 


that the organic matter in the soil is decomposed. 


a16= 


(4) Drainage increases the amount of available 
moisture in the soil and allows the roots to distribute 
themselves over a greater area. When the soil is in good 
tilth, the total capillary capacity is increased, The 
soil is then in a condition to more easily absorb the 
rainfall and to retain a larger proportion of it than is 
the case in undrained soil. Also drainage lowers the 
water table which is important since the roots won't pene- 
trate below the drainage table. 

The depth to which the water level should be lowered 
seldom exceeds 4 feet. The distance between drains de- 
pends on the ease with which water will flow through the 
soil toward the drain. Generally speaking, drains should 
be placed between every second row on heavy soils and on 


medium soils about every 300 feet. 


=i F= 


Fertilization. 


According to the last census, $2,000,000 is being 
expended for orchard fertilization each year. Fruit farms 
expended 30 ¢ par acre for fertilizers as compared with 
4 ¢ on hay and grain farms, and 2 f per acre on stock 
farms, 

It is the opinion of many scientists that in many 
cases the application of commercial fertilizers are made 
with negative results. It is difficult to determine the 
fertilizer needs of the apple, due to non-uniformity in 
soil and varieties over the large areas required, contin- 
uous cropping without chance for rotation and irregular 
bearing habit, 

In 1894 experiment started on the Woburn Experiment= 
al Fruit in England showed at the close of the 14th season, 
that there had been almost total absence of effect frou 
manure on clay soil. On poorer, sandy soil, manures gave 
a beneficial effect, The absence of effect on the clay 
soil was explained by the fact that trees draw their nou- 
rishment from a large area and from a considerable depth, 
and for that reason are very little affected by surface 


dressings of manure. 


Another experiment made at the Geneva Experiment Sta 
tion by Prefessor Hedrick, and reported in 1907, showed 
similar results. This experiment gave tne results of 
twelve years of annual applications of potash and phos- 


phate, in the form of wood ashes. During the last seven 


years acid phosphate was added at the rate of 169 pounds 
K20 and 129 pounds P05 per acre. The results of this 
experiment as a whole were considered negative, since tne 
annual increase in combined yield of all varieties on the 
treated plots barely paid the cost of the fertilizers and 
their application, 

These experiments do not prove that pertilization te 
always made with negative results, but simply show that 
the fruit grower should test for himself what plant food 


his soil needs. 


Nitrogen fertilizers. 


Sodium nitrete (Na Nog). 


This salt is the principal source of inorganic 
nitrogen in commercial fertilizers. The chemically pure 
salt, nitrate of soda, contains 16.47 per cent of nitrogen 
and the commercial article, called "Chile Seltpeter" con- 
tains from 15.5 to 16 per cent. Nitrogen in the nitrate 
form is easily taken up by the plant and for this reason 
acts quickly in inducing growth. 


Ammonium sulphate (N Hy )o 8 94: 


Sulphate of ammonia is a chemical salt which, 
when pure, contains 21,2 per cent of nitrogen, In com- 
mercial forms, however, it usually contains about 20 per 
cent of nitrogen. Sulphate of ammonia is obtained from 
the dry distillation of animal bone in the manufacture 


of bone-black, and also from the distillation of coal in 


=i G= 


Ge 


the manufacture of coke, Dried blood for fertilizing pur- 
poses is chiefly obtained from the large slaughtering establish- 
ments, Red blood contains from 13 to 14 per cent of nitrogen 
and is an excellent fertilizer since it decays very rapidly 
in the soil and is quickly available, 

Fish Scrap. The waste parts, as heads, skin and bones. 
It contains from 7 to 8 per cent of nitrogen and from 6 
to 8 per cent of phosphoric acid. It ranks with the high 
grade fertilizers, 


Wool and hair waste. These materials are dissolved 


with acid in such a manner as to render them available and 


are quite ricn in nitrogen. 


Phosphate Fertilizers, 


Bone phosphate in the form of raw bone contains about 
22 per cent phosphoric acid and 4 per cent of nitrogen, 
It is a good source of phosphoric acid since it is in its 
original state and has not lost any of its original con- 
stituents through burninz. Bone-black or animal-charcoal 
contains from 32 to 36 per cent of phosphoric acid, while 
bone ask contains from 27 to 37 per dent of phosphoric acid, 


South Carolina Phosphate. This rock contains 26 to 


28 per cent of phosphoric acid. It sometimes contains small 
percentages of compounds of iron and aluminum which interfere 
with the manufacture of the product and are undesirable, 


Phosphate Slag. This is a by-product in the manufac- 


ture of steel from pigeiron rich in phosphorus. The ground 


slag is applied directly to the soil without treatment with 


Kainit, This salt is the crude product of the mine 
and the potash contained in it is practically all in the 
form of a sulphate. It contains about 12.5 per cent of 
actual potash and 33 per cent of ordinary salt, and small- 
er percentages of magnesium chloride and magnesium sulphate. 

Sylvinit, It is similar in composition to Kainit. 
The potash in Sylvinit, however, exists both in the form 
of a sulphate and of a chlerid. It contains on an aver- 
age about 16 per cent of actual potash, 

Muriate of Potash. This is a manufactured product 
and contains about 50 per cent of actual potash, equiva- 
lent to 80 per cent muriate. The chief impurities are 
common salt and insoluable mattor, 


High-grade Sulphate of Potash. The salt is usual- 


ly sold on a purity basis of 98 per cent, or an equivalent 
of 53 per cent actual potash. It is usually considered 


superior to the muriate although more expensive, 


Line. 
There are three forms: limestone, quicklime and 
slaked lime, each differing from the other in composition. 
Quicklime absorbs moisture and slakes when exposed 
to the atmosphere. Lime thus slaked is called “aireslaked 
lime", and is usually less completely changed te a hy- 
drate than when water is added. 


Marble lime is made from pure limestone, and the bummed 


limestone thus obtained is practically pure oxide of lime. 


Burned limestone from the magnesium limestone contains 
from 50 to 60 per cent of calcium oxide, and 30 per cent 
or over of magnesium oxide. 

The growth of the tree will generally indicate the 
need of fertilizers, When the tree looks scrawny and 
stunted and either no growth or but a few inches of annual 
growth are being made, fertilizers are needed. Nitrogen 
appears to a greater extent in the leaves and encourages 
strong wood growth which is desirable in old trees not 
growing vigorously. Potash is the basis of the fruit acids 
and is also a color factor. Phosphoric acid insures pro- 
per ripening of both fruit and tree, Lime strengthens the 
limbs, hastens the ripening of the fruit and has a tendency 
to give a steady growth to the tree. 

Barnyard manure applied at the rate of 10 loads per 
acre supplies the necessary nitrogen, phosphoric acid, and 
potash, and will also add humus and improve the physical 
condition of the soil, 

When manure is not available, and the trees are not 
making the proper growth, the following fertilizers per acre 
are recomnended by the Geneva Station: 

75 lbs. nitrate of soda 
400 lbs. bone meal 


150 lbs. subphate of potash 
1500 lbs. fresh=burned lime 


“220 


Spraying. 


An old orchard which has been neglected for many years 
is a source of infection, a breedins place for all the dis~ 
eases to which the apple is heir. The environment has been 
such thet the trees have been weakened and made susceptible 
to disease, Some of the things which aid disease in the 
orchard are; poor drainage, heavy, wet soil, poor cultiva- 
tion and weeds which protect many diseases and pests during 
the winter, The ower of one of these orchards has a two- 
fold task on his hands. He must drive out the disease pro- 
ducing insécts and fungi and after they are out he must keep 
them out by spraying. 

In order to successfully combat a disease one should 
know something of its nature; how and when it attacks the 
tree. This is essential in order that the spraying may be 
done at exactly the correct time and the correct kind of 
poison used for the trouble. One disease requires one kind 
of spray and another disease requires another. There is 
no good in spraying with the wrong remedy. Some of the more 
important insect and fungous diseases I will describe to- 
gether with control methods for the same. 


Apple Scab. The apple scab, caused by Venturia inae- 


qualis, is one of the most destructive fungous diseases of 
the apple and is found every where the apple is cultivated 
and the weather conditions are favorable, 

On the leaves scab may be found as irregular rounded 
spots, somewhat swollen and with an indefinite margin, be- 


coming brown as they grow older. The spots may be as large 


ao0s 


as three-eights of an inch in diameter and later may dje 
and leave the leaf ragged in appearance, On the apples the 
spots are very small at first and circular, They soon be- 
come brown in color, end as they grow mey run together in 
patches. 

The fungous also grows in the blossoms and twigs, but 
causes less damage to these and is often overlooked by the 
grower. 

The damage from apple scab is caused in two ways. The 
apples are injured so as to be unfit for market, which often 
cuts down the price received per fruit one-fourth or a half, 
The most serious damage, however, is to the tree, in the in- 
jury to the leaves. The leaf surface is often so reduced 
that the tree has not enough vitality to ripen a crop of 
fruit, and the fruit is undersized and poor , besides being 
scabby. Alse the tree cannot properly ripen its next seas- 
on's fruit buds. 

Scab grows best in cool, moist weather, and does not 
ordinarily spread at all in warm, dry weether. The scab 
spots are covered with very small syores which are blow 
about by the wind and spread the disease. The spores grow 
and germinate whenever they find water enaugh to wet them 
and if they happen to be on an apple or apple leaf they 
soon grow down into it and start a new scab spot. The 
fungous lives over winter chiefly on the fallen leaves, 
and along about March produces another kind of spores, win- 


ter spores, which are smaller end more easily blown about. 


by the wind. These spores flying about in the orchard 
when the first leaves come out start the disease again for 
the next summer. 
Control: 
1. First scab spraying just before blossoms open. 
Lime-Sulphur 1-40. 
2. Second scab spraying just as petals fall. 
Lime-Sulphur 140. 
3. Third scab spraying three weeks after petals 
fall. Lime-Supphur 1-40. 
4. Fourth scab spraying nine to ten weeks after 
petals fall (about latter part of July or first of August). 


Lime-Sulphur 1-40. 


New York Apple-Tree Canker. This disease is caused by 


Sphaeropsis Malerum, and is found on the apple, pear, quince, 
hawthorn, plum, mulberry and elder. Epidemies occur more 
or less each year. The disease seems to be more severe on 
the Esopus Wagener and Greening. 

On the trunk and limbs the fungous causes the bark to 
become much roughened as well as thickened, and in many in- 
stances a portion of the wood is laid bare. The areu of bare 
wood is often small as compared to the extent of swollen 
bark; limbs are frequently seen that for six feet or more 
of their length are covered with rough bark. 


The fungous is most often found on the larger limbs 
of mature trees, Old neglected trees, low in vitality, 


suffer more than young, thrifty ones. Sphaeropsis infects 


trees in the spring, becoming evident as areas of discolored 
bark which spread until mid-summer and then produce pycnidia. 
In some cases the disease completely girdles the limb cut- 
ting off the flow of sap, which causes the leaves to shrivel 
up and die. The spores lodge in wounded places on the sur- 
face of the bark. A germ tube is sent out which under fav- 
orable conditions grows and produces a branched mycelium 

on which pycnidia are formed in about one month, and more 
produced as the mycelium grows and brenches. These ppenidia 
contain thousands of spores imbedded in a gelatinous mass inside 
the pycnidium, and as water enters they sweel snd the spores 
are shot out, blown about by the wind, and those that fall 
and germinate in a wound produce the cankers. The mycelium 
seem to be unable to penetrate to the cambium through living 
bark, which would suggest a means of control; namely, to 
avoid wounding the bark. 

All wounds should be coated with thick paint or graft- 
ing wax. Cankered limbs should be cut out wherever practi- 
cable, and as a further precaution, thorough spraying with 
lime sulphur applying 6 to 8 gallons per tree as follows: 

1. When the petals begin to separate and the first 
tinge of pink begins to show. 

2, When about two-thirds of the petals have fallen. 

3. As soon as all the blossoms have fallen. 

4, Ten days or two weeks after No. 3. 


These two fungous diseases are by no means the only 


ones which affect the apple, but perhaps they are the most 


important of any of them. 


bw 


insect Diseases of the Apple. 

Codling Moth. The Codling-moth costs the fruit grower 
an annual tax of $3,000,000 in New York alone, and it is es- 
timated that it would cost $8,000,000 to spray the apple 
trees in the United States for the Codling-moth at 4 fa 
tree. The Codling-moth is the parent of the apple worm 
and is the cause of nearly all wormy apples. ‘The apple 
worms pass the winter as full-grown larvae an rough, silken 
cocoons under the loose bark of the trees. In the spring 
they change to pupae and the eggs are laid on the fruit and 
leaves, The larvae begin hatching about 3 weeks after the 
blossoms fall, and centinue hatching throughout May. On 
emerging from the eggs they do a little feeding, and at this 
time before they enter the young apple, will be killed if 
the trees have been properly sprayed. They live in the ap- 
ple about 4 weeks and leave it through a hole in the side; 
they crawl to some crevice in the bark or elsewhere, spin 
a cocoon and change to pupae and come out as adults that 
year or remain until the next spring. 

Control: Two applications of Paris green, 1 lb. to 
109 gallone of water; or arsenate of lead, 25 lbs. to 50 
gallons of water. One application within one week after 
blossoms fall, end a second application about a week or 
ten days later. 

San Jose Scale. The Sen Jose Scale is a tiny insect 


Poe 


first found in San Jose, California, from which it bears 


its name. The insect multiplies in such vast numbers on 


21 = 


the bark as to form a scaly crust, which can be rubbed off 
with the finger, It attacks nearly all varieties of fruit 
trees and is perhaps the only insect that is not controlled 
to any extent by clean culture and thorough tillage. The 
female insects deposit their young as early hatched larvae, 
which resemble tiny, yellow mites except that they have legs 
and atennae of true insects. They wander about for a few 
hours and then insert their sucking mouth parts into the 
bark and soon secrete over their backs a scaly covering, 
There are at least four generations each season, and it has 
been calculated that one pair of San Jose scale insects 
could give rise to over three billion descendants in a sine 
gle season, if all lived out their lives without accident. 

Control: This pest can be controlled on orchard trees 
by thoroughly spraying with lime-sulphur wash, diluted to 
ite degrees Beaume, either in the fall, efter the leaves 
are mostly off the trees, or in the spring from the time 
when the buds begin to swell until the flowers commence 
opening. 

Round-headed Apple Tree Borer. The Ap;le tree borer 
is a dangerous insect enemy of the apple since it attacks 
perfectly healthy trees and its work is so concealed as to 
escape notice until the trees are past relief. 

The borers are tne larval stage of a long-horned beetle 
with two white stripes extending from the head the whole 
length of the body. The females lay their eggs during the 


warm season in small slits which they make in the bark. The 


borers whieh hatch from these eggs tunnel in the inner bark 


=28= 


and sapwood, making large tunnels filled with borer dust. 
Their presence can generally be detected by the dust which 
falls out of the tunnels when these are not entirely closed. 
Badly infected trees put out only sparse and small leaves 
in the spring and sometimes die completely later on. 

Control: As a preventive, the orchard should be kept 
free from weeds and rubbish so as not to provide a hiding 
place for the beetles. Cut away the bark over the tunnels 
until the worm can be reached with a wire. When all have 
been removed, paint the wounds with white lead paint, diluted with 
raw linseen oil at the rate of 100 lbs. of paint to 3 to 4 
gallons of oil. During the warm spring and summer keep 
the bestles from laying eggs in the bark by protecting the 
troes with brow wrapping paper. 

The above insect and fungous pests are only a few of 
the many which attack the apple. For that reason I will 
give a general outline for spraying the orchard which will 
cover the needs of the grower in most cases. From this out- 
line it will be seen that fungicides and insecticides may 
often be used together, controlling both e fungous and in- 
sect pest at one end the same time. 

General Plan for Spraying the Apple Orchard, taken 
from Cornell Bulletin 283; 

I. Dormant season before lesf buds open but just as 
they are swelling: 

a. Lime-sulfur as a contact spray for 


San Jose scale 32 to 33° Beaume 1-8 
Blister mite 32 to 33; Beaume l-1l. 


b. Add arsenate of lead, 2 pounds to 50 gallons, 
to the lime sulfur as a poison for 
Bud=moth 
Cigar-case-bearer 
II, After leaf buds open but before blossoms open, i.e. 
when just beginning to show some pink. Watch weather and 
get spray on before rein, not after: 
a. lLime-sulfur solution, 32° Beaume 1-40, or 
Bordeaux, 3-4-50, for apple scab (the fungus). 
b. Arsenate af lead, 2-3 pounds to 50 gallons, 
added to lime-sulfur or Bordeaux as a poison for 
Bud=moth 
Cipar case-bearer 


Canker-worm 


(This application should never be omitted during cold, rainy 


ae Sk 


seasons.) 


Ill. After petals have fallen beginning when about two- 


thirds have fallen. Have spray on before rain comes, This 


is important. 
: a, Lime-sulfur, 32° Beaune 1-40, or Bordeaux 
3-4-50, for 


Apple scab 
Leaf spot 


ob. Arsenate of lead, 2-3 lbs. to 50 gallons, used 
with lime-sulfur or Bordeaux for 
Codling-moth 


Canker-worm 
Bud=moth 


This is the most important of all the applications. 


~30- 


IV. Ten days to two weeks later. Before rain period: 


a. Lime-sulfur, 32° Beaume 1-40, or Bordeaux, 


3-4-50, for 


Apple scab 
Leaf spot 


b. Arsenate of lead, 2-3 lbs. to 50 gallons, used 
with lime-sulfur or Bordeaux for 


Codling=moth 
Canker-werm 


V. Eight to nine weeks after blossoms fall: 
Same as IV for late scab infection and late attacks of cod-= 
ling moth, In most seasons this application is not neces= 
sary. 

If aphis appears, spray before leaves curl with whale- 
oil soap, 1 1b. to 6 gallons, or kerosene emulsion diluted 


with six parts water, or use one of the tobacco extracts. 


-3]- 


Cost of Renovation. 


The usual cost of the first year's work will be from 
$30 to $57 per acre according to the condition of the or- 
chard, 

This table shows the minimum and maximum cost per acre 
compiled from records obtained from several farms in New 


York State. 


Estimated Cost of First Yeer's Work in Renovating 
an Old Orchard. 


8 ee a a a 8 Ga A Re ek a eS ea ae ee a te 8 Oe Oe ee et Os es ee 


Ce me kk me On ee ee ae et 8 2 at ee 8 eat ae 0 28 On ne OD at OS Oe at ee ee we oe 


Plowing 82.00 3.00 
Manure, 10 to 20 loads, at $1. or 
its equivalent in commercial 


fertilizer 10.00 20.00 
Hauling manure, sverage at 50f a 
lead 5.00 10.00 
‘Pruning and hauling brush 5.090 19,90 
Disking or harrowing twice 1.00 1.50 
Disking or harrowing third or 
fourth time -50 1.00 
Cultivation, 2 to 4 times 200 1.90 
Spraying once; 
Meterial 2,00 4.90 
Labor 1.00 1.50 


Total $27.00 $52.00 


a3Zea 


Profits from Renovated Orchards. 


The following results are returns from an apple ore 
chard of eleven acres in Orleans Co., N. Y., which was 
taken over in 1896. The gross returns from this orchard 


are; 


1896 $250.00 
1897. 12.00 
1898 800.00 
1899 200.00 
1900 1200.00 
1901 300.00 
1902 2000.00 
1903 1400.00 
1904 2722.59 


Another farmer in Monroe County, N. Y., obtained the 
following results. The orchard consisted of 4 acres of 
Baldwins over 50 years old, which had had no care whatever 
for at least 20 years. This orchard was sold to a good 
orchardist, who began the work of renovation at once. 
Seventy-five loads of stable manure were applied and plowed 
under ahd the most thorough cultivation was practiced. 

The first year not more than $25 worth of fruit was 
sold, but the second year, in response to more scientific 
management, $1,100 worth of fruit was sold. Pruning had 
cost about $50, ploping and cultivation $75, spraying, 
$60 and fertilization $100, a total of $285, leaving a 


net profit for the first two years of operating of 9840 
or $210 per acre. 


Another 6.1 acre orchard in western New York gave the 


following results: 


-33— 


The orchard contained 243 mature trees, about one- 


half of which were 36 years of age and the remainder over 


50 years old. 


The average yield during the eight years 


was 67 barrels per acre, which sold for an average price 


of §2,.33 per barrel, 


$1.16 per barrel. 


The average cost of production was 


Income, expense, and net profits on a 6.1 acre apple 
orchard in western New York. 


oe ee 


Total :per acre: Total :Per acre 


1902 $913.87 
1903 969.89 
1904 559.40 
1905 792.25 
1906 818.76 
1907 861.45 
1908 1362.97 
1909 1896.79 


1910 1008.44 165.32 


9-year 
average 1020.42 


$149.81 
159.00 

91.70 
129.87 
134,22 
141.22 
223 44 
310.95 


167.28 


$519.39 $85.15 $394.48 $64.68 
482.56 79.11 487.33 79.89 
360.39 59.08 199.02 32.62 
324.31 53.16 467.94 76.71 
401.80 65.87 416.96 68.35 
364.40 59.74 497.05 81.48 
583.55 95.67 779.42 127.77 
591.93 97.03 1304.86 213.92 
399.77 65.54 608.67 99.78 
447.57 73,38 572.85 93.93 


“34s 


Summery. 


1. Qld trees can be renovated and made to produce a 
good income while the young trees are growing. 

2. Clean culture and cover crop is the best system 
of cultivation. Cultivate until the middle of July and then 
sow a cover crop. 

3. Drainage either natural or artificial necessary. 

4. Prune thoroughly, remove excess of trees and prune 
individual trees annually. 

5. Study the orchards fertilizer needs and if indica- 
tions point toward a need of more plant food, supply it. 
Manure is the best fertilizer. 

6. Spray for both insect and fungous diseases, 

7, Renovation costs from $30 to $57 per acre. 

8. The profits warrant the cost of renovation and will 


increase annually. 


PPT RS hey 
eX 


uy NA,