(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload
See other formats

Full text of "A treatise on the law of evidence as administered in England and Ireland; with illustrations from Scotch, Indian, American and other legal systems"



l» 





MjS 


mS 




fc»^H 


m\ 




W^Mm: 


^ 


1 










w 


::-'',[' - 


1 


i 


i 


ft'ji 


1 


! 


f 


Ff- 


i 


. i 




1, 


-! 


"1 


II 


11 

■ 





•■rfsil^ 



(IJornpU ICaui ^rl^onl Htbrary 



Cornell University Library 
K 681.T24 1897 

V.I 

A treatise on the law of evidence as adm 




3 1924 022 020 485 




Cornell University 
Library 



The original of this bool< is in 
the Cornell University Library. 

There are no known copyright restrictions in 
the United States on the use of the text. 



http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924022020485 



A TREATISE 



ON THE 



LAW OF EVIDENCE 

AS ADMINISTERED IN ENGLAND AND IRELAND; 



WITH ILLUSTRATIONS FROM SCOTCH, INDIAN, AMERICAN, 
AND OTHER LEGAL SYSTEMS. 

BY HIS HONOUE 

THE LATE JUDGE FiTT iTAYLOE. 



Nintf) lElritton. 

(in pakt ee-weittten) 

By G. PITT-LEWIS, Q.C. 

SEttf) Notes as to American ILalw 

By CHARLES F. CHAMBERLAYNB. 



IN THREE VOLUMES. 

Vol. I. 



LONDON: 

SWEET AND MAXWELL, Ltd., 3, CHANCERY LANE. 

BOSTON, MASS. : 
THE BOSTON BOOK COMPANY, 

1897. 



Copyright, 1897, ^^ 
By The Boston Book Company. 



?Entorstt2 Press; 
John Wilson and Son, Cambridge, U.S.A. 



PREFACE. 



The American editor is completely excused from the 
necessity of saying anything concerning the merits of 
Judge Taylor's original work. A treatise which in Eng- 
land and America has so long and so admirably stood the 
tests of time and daily use among an exacting profession, 
critical as to correctness of statement and fullness of 
research, speaks for itself with sufficient distinctness. 

The ninth English edition embodies many extensive 
and painstaking improvements by G. Pitt Lewis, Esq., 
Q. C. Among others, mention may be made of the facts 
that the original work, while benefited by many additional 
cases, has been condensed, without sacrifice of essential 
value; and that the range of citation for English and 
Irish cases and for English legislation has been carried 
down to a late day. The condensation referred to has 
added clearness to the text. Many illustrations of prin- 
ciple, which, though valuable in themselves, in earlier 
editions somewhat impeded the flow of thought, have been 
judiciously reduced to a proper position as foot-notes, in 
condensed form and, so far as possible, in alphabetical 
order. The English editor, thinking, to use his own lan- 
guage, " that the true work of the editor of a law book is 
to strive his best to render the work which he is editing 
one that the author would have produced if writing at the 



IV PEEFACB. 

present day," has industriously and successfully labored to 
that end. 

The American editor, while not, it is hoped, neglecting 
the valuable consideration suggested by his learned coad- 
jutor, has proposed, as his primary object, a somewhat 
different result : — namely, to give to the profession, so 
far as conveniently possible within the limitations imposed 
by the form of notes, such a statement of the modern law 
of evidence as might be practically useful to the active 
practitioner, and yet possess value to those who were 
desirous of acquainting themselves with the fundamental 
principles of the subject. 

It has seemed necessary, in pursuing this object, that 
many inviting by-paths of antiquarian research should 
consciously be neglected, and the desire to follow the cur- 
rent of authority up among the headsprings of our juris- 
prudence should be repressed. The historical development 
of the present rules of evidence has been noted only so far 
as seemed fairly needed for a clear conception of the rules 
themselves. The feeling has been strong that the changed 
conditions of modern life have not failed to affect also the 
development of this branch of the law, and that it there- 
fore yearly grows more essential that, as the intricacy and 
magnitude of matters submitted to judicial investigation 
continues to increase, the rules of evidence under which 
they must be determined should be simplified, both in 
number and through being formulated with precision. In 
many ways, statutory aud judicial, it is fairly to be said 
that the law of evidence is tending in this direction. 
The present work is intended as a contribution to the 
same end. 

The range of citation has necessarily embraced the entire 
United States and the Province of Canada. So far as 



PEEFACE. V 

possible, leading cases have been cited in each jurisdiction. 
But to many a practitioner without ready access to a large 
law library such bountiful citations merely furnish a "feast 
of Tantalus." To remedy this difficulty, so far as possible, 
the point of the case cited has been given in the exact 
language of the court. This not only furnishes a quotable 
statement, but possesses the additional advantage that the 
reader is not forced to rely wholly upon the ability of an 
editor to catch and paraphrase the precise shade of mean- 
ing intended by the court. 

The plan of putting the entire collection of American 
law relating to a particular topic at the end of the English 
chapters on the same subject has been found acceptable in 
practical use, and is continued in the present international 
work. To afford still further opportunity for ready ref- 
erence to American and Canadian law, a separate index 
to subjects treated in the American notes and a separate 
tabulation of cases therein cited have been prepared. 

While it has not proved possible to embrace within the 
present compass certain topics covered by well accepted 
separate treatises, or by the statutes of the several juris- 
dictions, it is hoped that the present work will prove of 
material assistance to our busy profession in the prepara- 
tion and trial of causes, and also be of value to those who 
are interested in a consideration of the underlying prin- 
ciples which affect the larger aspects of the subject. 

CHARLES F. CHAMBEELAYNE. 
Boston, January 19, 1897. 



analtsjfjs. 



PAKT I. 

Nature and. Principles of Evidence, 



CHAPTER I. 

PAGE 

Peeliminaey Observations 1-2 

American Note : Definitions. 

Evidence — Fact — Proof — Testimony — Cumula- 
tive Evidence — Competent Evidence — Kele- 
vancy — Legal Relevancy 2^-2' 



CHAPTER II. 

MATTEES JtTDlCIALLT NOTICED WITHOUT PkOOF .... 3-21 

American Note: Judicial Notice. 

Required Cognizance — Instances — Optional Cog- 
nizance — Instances 21^-21'^° 



CHAPTER III. 

How Questions op Fact Tried — Eunctions of Judge 

IN Jury Trials 22-52 

American Note: Law and Fact. 

Function of the Court — Construction of Writ- 
ings — Negligence — Due Diligence — Probable 
Cause — Preliminary Facts — Foreign Laws . 52^-52'" 



ANALYSIS. VU 

CHAPTER IV. 

PAGE 

The Grounds of Belief 53-68 

CHAPTER V. 

Presumptive Evidence 69-183 

American Note: Presumptions. 

Conclusive Presumptions — Instances .... 183''-183^° 
Presumptions Proper — Instances 183"-183^'' 



PAET II. 

Rules Governing the Production of Testimony. 



CHAPTER I. 

Production of Evidence governed by Pour Great Rules. 

Rule I. — Evidence must correspond with Issues ; Vari- 
ances ; Amendments 184-218 

American Note : Relation of Pleading to Evidence. 

Evidence de Bene — Relevancy — Auxiliary Facts 218^-218* 

CHAPTER II. 

Rule II. — Evidence must be confined to Points in Issue 219-257 
American Note : Res inter Alios Actse. 

Instances 257^-257= 

Relaxation of Rule — Mental State — Tracing a 

Constant Cause — Instances — Railroad Cases . 257^-257'^' 

Character Evidence. 

Civil and Criminal Cases — Exceptions — Charac- 
• ter of "Witness — Proof 257=^-257''* 



viii ANALYSIS. 

CHAPTER III. 

PAGE 

Rule III. — Burthen of Proof lies on Paety who sub- 
stantially ASSERTS THE AFFIRMATIVE : RiGHT TO 

Begin and to Reply 258-276 

American Note : Burden of Proof. 

Double Meaning — Instances 276'-276" 



CHAPTER IV. 

Rule IV. — The Best Evidence must always be pro- 
duced; Secondary Evidence (1) As to Documents, 
Notices to Produce, &c. ; (2) As to Oral Evidence, 
Depositions, &c 277-358 

American Note : Best Evidence. 

Early Rule — Modern Statement — Application to 

Written Instruments 358i-358»* 



PART III. 

Certain Particular Descriptions of Evidence. 



CHAPTER I. 



Evidence Addressed to the Senses 359-365 

American Note : Real Evidence. 

Mixed Beal Evidence — Instances — Personal In- 
juries — Compulsory Exhibition — Experiments 
in and out of Court 3G5^-36b^' 



CHAPTER II. 
Hearsay is, as a General Rule, rejected 366-391 



ANALYSIS. IX 

PAGE 

American Note : Bes GestsB. 

Declarations Coustitutiug — Declarations, Facts in 
the Res Gestae — Declarations, Fart of a Ees 
Gestffi Fact — Instances — Spontaneity as a 
Test — Narrative — Differences in American 

Decisions — Privity 391^-391^^ 

Hearsay. 

Objections — Reported Statements as Facts — 

Instances 391^^-391=2 

CHAPTER III. 

First Exception to General Rule rejecting Hearsay- 
Evidence AS to Matters op Public and General 
Interest ... 392-412 

American Note: Matters of Public and General 
Interest. 

Boundaries, Public and Private — Reputation. . 412^-412'^ 

CHAPTER IV. 

Second Exception to General Rule rejecting Hear- 
say-Evidence AS to Matters of Pedigree .... 413—427 
American Note : Hearsay concerning Pedigree . 427^-427" 

CHAPTER V. 

Third Exception to General Rule rejecting Hear- 
say-Evidence AS TO Ancient Possession 428-433 

American Note: Hearsay concerning Ancient Pos- 
session. 

Corroboration 433M33^ 



CHAPTER VI. 

Fourth Exception to General Rule rejecting Hearsay- 
Evidence AFFORDED BY DECLARATIONS BY DECEASED 

Persons against their Pecuniary or Proprietary 

Interests 434-452 

American Note : Declarations against Interest. 

Not Admissions 452^-452^" 



X ANALYSIS. 

CHAPTER VII. 

PAGE 

Fifth Exception to General Rule rejecting Hear- 
say-Evidence AFFORDED BY DECLARATIONS IN THE 

Course of Office or Business 453-463 

American Note : Shop Books 4631-463' 

Books of Account 463'-4632* 

Entries in Course of Business. 

An Extended Development ....... 46325-463" 



CHAPTER VIII. 

Sixth Exception to General Rule rejecting Hear- 
say-Evidence afforded by Dying Declarations . . 464-470 

American Note: Dying Declarations. 

Modern Restrictions 4701-4702" 



CHAPTER IX. 

Admissions 471-554 

American Note: Admissions. 

Silence — Compromise 554^-554" 

CHAPTER X. 

Confessions 555-588 

American Note: Confessions. 

Corroboration — Undue Influence — Instances . . 588^-588^' 



AifALYSIS. XI 



PART lY. 

Special Rules of Law as to the Evidence in Certain 
Particular Cases. 



CHAPTEE I. 

PAGE 

Public Policy eequiees the Exclusion of Evidence on 
Certain Matters, viz. : 

(1) Communications during Marriage between 
Husband and Wife: (2) Communications 
with Professional Advisers : (3) Evidence of 
Judicial Personages and of Counsel : (4) Mat- 
ters which are State Secrets: (5) Indecent 
Matters 589-622 

American Note: Privileged Matters. 

Marital Confideuce — Communications between 
Attorney and Client — Secrets of State — Pub- 
lic Justice — Grand and Petty Jurors — Sources 
of Information — Matters against Decency • . 622^-622^' 



CHAPTER II. 

Certain Matters which are not Provable bt a Sin- 
gle Witness, viz. : 

(1) Treason: (2) Perjury: (3) Affiliation: (4) 
Breach of Promise to Marry : (5) The Evi- 
dence of Accomplices in Crime 623-635 

American Note: Corroboration. 

Treason — Perjury — Accomplices — Bastardy 

and Seduction 635^-635^ 



XU AI^AiYSIS. 



CHAPTER III. 



PAGE 



Certain Matters which are required to be Evidenced 

BY Writing, viz. : 637-738 

(1) At Common Law : '■ 

(2) By Certain Statutes." 

American Note: Statutory Writings 738' 



CHAPTEE IV. 

The Admissibility of Parol Evidence to affect 

Written Instruments 739-808 

American Note: Parol Evidence Rule. 

Limitations applied — Receipts — Bills of Lading 
— Bills of Parcels — Collateral Agreements — 
Scope misunderstood — Mortgages and Trusts 
— Duress — Illegality — Incapacity — Fraud — 
Consideration — Mistake — Incomplete Deliv- 
ery — Discharge, Waiver, Modification, etc. . 808^-808^' 



■^ By Common Law, " writing " was, in general, equivalent to a deed. The prin- 
cipal matters required by the Common Law to be " in writing " (that is by deed) are : 
— (a) Grants or Demises of Incorporeal Rights: (b) Gifts of Personalty unaccom- 
panied by delivery, whether inter vivos or mmiis causa: (c) Appointments of Agents 
to execute Deeds : (d) Contracts with Corporations : and (e) Powers of Attorney 
for the Execution of Deeds. 

2 The principal matters required by Statute to be evidenced by writing are as 
follows: — (a) Sales of Ships or Shares in Ships: (b) Certain dealings with Real 
Property (including Leases for more than Three Years) : (c) Or matters falling 
within the Statute of Frauds, such as Assignments or Surrenders of Realty, Special 
Promises by Executors or Administrators, Guarantees, Agreements in consideration 
of Marriage, Contracts for Interests in Lands, Agreements not to be performed within 
a Year, and Sales of Goods for £10, or upwards : (d) Wills and Codicils and Revo- 
cations or Revivals thereof : (e) Acknowledgments (other than by part payment) of 
Debts or Incorporeal Rights which have become Statute-barred : (f ) Acceptances : 
(g) Contracts under the Truck Act : (h) Or under the Merchant Shipping Act : 
(i) Documents governed by various other Acts: Or (j) Documents requiring Inrol- 
ment or Registration, such as Warrants of Attorney or Cognovits, Bills of Sale, 
Grants of Annuities, &c. 



ANALYSIS. xm 



PART Y- 

Instruments of Evidence. 



CHAPTER I. 



Witnesses, and the Means of Procuring their At- 
tendance 809-873 



CHAPTER II. 

The Competency of Witnesses 874-910 

American Note : Competency of Witnesses. 
Mental Derangement — Youth — Intoxication — 
Atheism — Policy of Law — Judges — Attor- 
ney taking the Stand — Husband and Wife — 
Infamous Crime — Testamentary Witnesses — 
Functions of Court and Jury 910^-910^ 



CHAPTER III. 

The Examination of Witnesses — including the tak- 
ing OF Affidavits — before an Examiner, or on 
Commission 911-978 

American Note : Memoranda refreshing Memory. 

Primary Recollection — Secondary Recollection . 978^-978''' 

Separation of Witnesses. 

Consequences of Disobedience 978^'-978^ 

Examination of Witnesses. 

Direct Examination — Scope 9 78^-9 78'^ 

Cross Examination — Scope — Impeachment 

— Contradictory Statements 978'M78^' 

Subsequent Examinations 978^^-978^' 



XIV ANALYSIS. 

CHAPTER IV, 

PAGE 

Matters Evidenced by Public Documents .... 979-1179 
American Note : Public Documents- 
Proof— Relevancy 11791-1179^° 

CHAPTER V. 

Matters Evidenced by Private Writings . . . 1180-1229 

American Note: Private Writings. 

Production — Proof of Execution — Attested 
Writings — Exceptions — Unavailable Wit- 
ness — "Own Claim "— Ancient Documents 
— Proof of Contents 1229^-1229^' 

Proof of Handwriting. 
Witnesses — Correspondence, etc. — " Com- 
parison of Hands " — Conflict of Authority 
— Ancient Documents — Documents in the 
Case — Province of Court and Jury — Let- 
ters in Reply 1229^^229" 



PAET VI. 

Some General Rules as to the Admission 
or Rejection of Evidence at the Trial, 
and as to the Admissibility of Further 
Evidence on Appeal 1230-1234 



( ^v ) 



BY WHICH VABIOtrS lEISH, SCOTCH, Am) AMEEIOAN ATJTHOBITrES 
ARE CITED m THIS TREATISE. ' 



NoXB. — Moat of the American Reports are to he found in the respective Libraries 
of the Inner and Middle Temples. But some few of them are only to he 
obtained at the British Museum. The letters A., B., C, D., appended to the 
American Reports, denote the relative estimation in which those Reports are 
held by the prof ession in general, out of the particular State where the decisions 
were pronounced : A. marking the highest degree of excellence. A very eminent 
American jurist kindly fv/rnished the Author with this guide. 



ABBBEVIATIONS. NAME OP -WOEK, ETO. 

Addis Addison's Reports, Pennsylvania, 1791 — 1799. 1 vol. (0.) 

Aik Aiken's Reports, Vermont, 1826—1827. 2 vols. (B.) 

A. K. Marst A. K. MarshaU's Rep., Kentucky, 1817—1821. 3 vols. (D.) 

Ale. & Nap Aloook & Napier's Reports, King's Bench, Ireland. 1 vol. 

Alison, Or. L Alison's Principles of the Criminal Law of Scotland. 

Alwon, Praot. of \ j^ison's Practice of the Criminal Law of Scotland. 
Cr. L ) 

Am. Deo American Decisions (Select Cases from various American State 

Courts), San Francisco, 1700— 1S44. 40 vols. 

Am. Ed American edition. 

Am. Jur American Jurist. Boston. 

Am. Rep American Reports (Selected from the Decisions of the Courts 

of last resort in the several States of America), Albany, 

1869—1887. 60 vols. 
Am. St. Rep American State Reports (a continuation of Anierican Reports), 

1887—1895. 42 vols. (Series stUl current.) 

Anthon Anthon's Nisi Pr. Rep., New York, 1808—1818. 1 vol. (D.) 

Applet Appleton's Reports, Maine, from 1841. 1 vol. (C.) 

Arm. M. & Armstrong, Macartney & Ogle's Rep., Nisi Pr., Irel. 1 vol. 

Arm. & T Armstrong & Trevor's Rep. of R. v. O'Connell, Dub., 1844. 

Bail Bailey's Reports, South Carolina, 1828—1832. 2 vols. (B.) 

Ball & B ,, Ball & Beatty's Reports, Chancery, Ireland. 2 vols. 

Batty Batty's Reports, King's Bench, Ireland. 1 vol. 

Bay Bay's Reports, South Carolina, 1783—1804. 2 vols. (B.C.) 

Bell, Dig BeU's Digest of the Laws of Scotland. 

Bibb Bibb's Reports, Kentucky, 1808—1817. 4 vols. (D.) 

Binn Binney's Reports, Pennsylvania, 1799 — 1814. 6 vols. (A.) 

Bland, Ch Bland's Chancery Rep., Maryland, 1811—1830. 2 vols. (0.) 

Blaokf Blackford's Reports, Indiana, 1817—1838. 4 vols. (CD.) 

Browne Browne's Reports, Pennsylvania, 1806 — 1814. 2 vols. (C.) 

Burnet, Cr. L. . . Burnet on Criminal Law of Scotland. 



' A list of the ordinary abbreviations used in English law is commonly known, 
and can, at any rate, be found in the catalogues of many law publishers. 



XVI ABBREVIATIONS, ETC. 

ABBEBVIATIONS. NAME OF -WOEK, ETO. 

Caines Caines's Eeporte, New York, 1803—1806. 3 vols. (A.) 

City Hall Eeo. . . New York Recorder, containing Reports of Cases in City Courts 
from 1816 to 1821. 6 vols. 

Com Commonwealth. 

CoukUn's Pr Conklin's Practice of Cts. of United States, New Tork, 1842. 

Conn Connecticut Reports, by T. Day, 18U— 1848. 15 vols. (B.) 

Const. R Constitutional Rep., S. Carolina, 1812—1816. 2 vols. (B.C.) 

Oonst.U.S.Amend. Amended Constitution of the United States. 

Cooke & Ale Cooke and Alcock's Rep., King's Bench, Ireland. 1 vol. 

Cooke Cooke's Reports, Tennessee, 1811—1814. 1 vol. (D.) 

Coweu Cowen's Reports, New Tork, 1823—1828. 9 vols. (A.) 

Coxa Coxe's Reports, New Jersey, 1790—1796. 1 vol. (C.) 

Cranch Cranch's Rep., Sup. Ct. of U.S., 1800—1815. 9 vols. (A.) 

Crawf.&D.,Abr.O. Crawford and Dix's Abridged Cases in Ireland. 1vol. 

Crawf. & D., C. C. Crawford and Dix, Irish Circuit Reports. 3 vols. 

Cush Cushing's Rep. Supreme Court of Massachusetts. 9 vols. 

Dall Dallas's Reports. Supreme Courts of United States, and 

Pennsylvania, 1790—1806. 4 vols. (A.) 

Dane, Abr Dane's Abridgment, United States. 

Day Day's Reports, Connecticut, 1802—1810. 5 vols. (B.) 

Deane, Verm. R. . . Deane's Reports, Supreme Court of Vermont. 3 vols. 

Dev Devereux's Rep., North Carolina, 1826—1834. i vols. (B.) 

Dev. & B Devereux and Battle's Rep., North Carolina, 1834 — 1840. 

4 vols. (B.) 

Dickson, Ev Dickson on Evidence in Scotland. 2 vols. Edinburgh, 1855. 

Drury, Ch. R Drury's Irish Chancery Rep. , temp. Sugden, Ch. 1 vol. 

Dru. & War Drury and Warren's Reports, Chancery, Ireland, i vols. 

Ersk. Inst Erskine's Institutes of the Law of Scotland. 

Eairf Pairfield's Reports, Maine, 1833—1835. 3 vols. (B.) 

Fox & Sm Eox and Smith's Reports, King's Bench, Ireland. 2 vols. 

Gall GaUison's Reports, United States, 1st Circuit Court, 1812 — 

1815. 2 vols. (A.). Judge Story's Decisions. 

Gill. & J GUI and Johnson's Rep., Maryland, 1829—1840. 10 vols. (B.) 

Glassf. Bv Glassford on Evidence, Edinburgh, 1820. 

Gr. Ev Greenleaf on Evidence. 

Gray Gray's Reports, Supreme Court of Massachusetts. 2 vols. 

Greenl Greenleaf's Reports, Maine, 1820—1832. 9 vols. (B.) 

Halst Halstead's Reports, New Jersey, 1821 — 1831. 7 vols. (0.) 

Har. & G Harris and Gill's Rep., Maryland, 1826 — 1829. 2 vols. (B.) 

Har. & M'Hen. .. Harris and M-Henry's Rep., Maryland, 1790 — 1799. 4 vols. 

Hardin Hardin's Reports, Kentucky, 1805 — 1808. 1 vol. (D.) 

Harr. & J Harris and Johnson's Reports, Maryland, 1800 — 1826 7 vnla 

(B.) 

Hawks Hawks' Reports, North Carolina, 1820—1826. 4 vols. (C.) 

Hayes Hayes' Reports, Exchequer, Ireland. 1 vol. 

Hayes & Jon Hayes and Jones' Reports, Exchequer, Ireland. 1 vol. 



ABBREVIATIONS, ETC. XVU 

ABBEEVIATIONS. NAilB OP WOEK, ETC. 

Hayw Haywood's Reports, North Carolina, 1789—1806. (0.) 

Hen. & Munf Henuing and Munford's Rep., Virginia, 1806—1809. 4 vols. (C.) 

Heisk Heiskell, Tennessee, 1870—1874. 12 vols. 

Hill, S. Car. R. . . Hill's Reports, South Carolina, 1833—1835. 2 vols. (B.C.) 

HiU, N. T. R. . . Hill's Reports, New York, 1841—1842. 3 vols. (B.) 

Howard, S. Ct. E. Howard's Rep., United States, Sup. Ct., from 1843. (A.) 

Hume, Com Hume's Commentaries on Criminal Law of Scotland. 

Humph Humphrey's Reports, Tennessee, 1839 — 1841. 2 vols. (D.) 

Iredell Iredell's Reports, North Carolina, 1840—1841. 1 vol. (C.) 

Ir. C. L. R Irish Common Law Reports, 1849 — 1866. 17 vols. Formerly 

cited by Author as " Ir. Law R. N. S." 
Ir. Ch Irish Chancery Reports, 1850 —1866. 17 vols. Formerly cited 

by Author as " Ir. Eq. R. N. S." 

Ir. dr. R Irish Circuit Reports. 1 vol. 

Ir. Eq. Rep Irish Equity Reports, 1838—1850. 13 vols. 

Ir. L. T. Rep. . . Irish Law Times Reports. 

Ir. L. R Irish Law Reports (i. e., Reports at Common Law), 1838 — 1850. 

13 vols. 

I. R. C. L Irish Reports, Common Law, 1867—1877. 

I. R. Eq Irish Reports, Equity, 1867—1877. 

J. J. Marsh J. J. Marshall's Rep., Kentucky, 1829—1832. 7 vok. (D.) 

Jebb, C. C Jebb's Crown Cases Reserved, Ireland. 1 vol. 

Jebb & B Jebb and Bourke's Rep., Queen's Bench, Ireland. 1 vol. 

Jebb & Sy Jebb and Symes' Rep., Queen's Bench, Ireland. 2 vols. 

Johns Johnson's Reports, New York, 1806—1823. 20 vols. (A.) 

Johns. Ch. R Johnson's Chan. Rep., New York, 1814—1823. 7 vols. (A.) 

Jones Jones' Exchequer Reports, Ireland. 2 vols. 

Jones & Lat Jones and Latouche's Rep., ^Dhaneery, Ireland. 3 vols. 

Joy on Conf Joy on Confession in Criminal Cases, Dublin, 1842. 

Kent, Com Kent's Commentaries, Boston, 1840. 

Kirby Kirby's Reports, Connecticut, 1785 — 1788. 1 vol. (D.) 

L. R. (Ir.) Law Reports for Ireland, 1878—1894. 33 vols. (vol. 33 current 

to end of 1894) . Formerly cited by Author as ' ' Ir. Law R." 

LL., U. S Laws of the United States. 

Lans (N. Y.) .... Lansing, Reports of Decisions in the Supreme Court of the 

State of New York. New York and Albany, 1869—1873. , 

7 vols. 

Law Reo. 1st Ser. 1 -^^^ -Recorder, 1st and 2nd Series. Irish. 10 vols. 

or 2nd Ser ) 

Leigh, R Leigh's Reports, Virginia, 1829—1839. 9 vols. (B.) 

Lloyd & Gr Lloyd and Goold's Ir. Chan. Rep., temp. Sugden, Ch. 1 vol. 

Long. & T Longfield and Townsend's Rep. Exchequer, Ireland. 1 vol. 

Louis Reports of Louisiana, 1830 — 1840. 16 vols. (B.) 

jIoC MoCord's Rep., South Carolina, 1820 — 1828. 4 vols. (B.C.) 

McC Ch. R McCord's Chancery Reports, South Carolina, 1825 — 1827. 

2 vols. (B.C.) 

McDouall, Inst. . . MoDouaU's (Ld. Bankton) Institutes of Law of Scotland. 

McNally, Ev McNally on Evidence, Ireland. 

A. K. Marsh A. K. Marshall's Rep., Kentucky, 1817 — 1821. 3 vols. (D.) 

J J. Marsh J. J. Marshall's Rep., Kentucky, 1829— 1832. 7 vols. (D.) 



xyiU ABBREVIATIONS, ETC. 

ABBEEVIATIOHS. NAME OF 'WOEK, ETC. 

Mart Martin'8 Reports, Louisiana, 1809—1823. 12 vols. (B.) 

Mart., N. S Martin's Reports, New Series, Louisiana, 1823— 1830. 8 vols. 

(B.) 

Mart., N. Car. R.. Martin's North Carolina Reports, 1778—1797. 1 vol. (D.) 

Mart. & Y Martin and Yerger's Rep., Tennessee, 182-5—1828. 1 vol. (D.) 

Mason Mason's Reports, United- States, Ist Circuit Court, 1816 — 

1830. 5 vols. (A.) Judge Story's Decisions. 

Mass Reports of Massachusetts, 1804 — 1822. (A.) 

Meto Metoalf's Reports, Massachusetts, 1840— 1846. (A.) 

Milw. Eo. Ir. R. . . Mil ward's Eooles. Irish Rep., temp. Dr. Eadohfle. 

Mo Missouri, 1821— 1881. 74 vols. 

MoU MoUoy's Reports, Chancery, Ireland. 3 vols. 

Monroe Monroe's Reports, Kentucky, 1824 — 1828. 7 vols. (D.) 

Morison Morison's Scotch Reports. 

Munf Munford's Reports, Virginia, 1810—1820. 6 vols. (C.) 

Murph Muxphey's Reports, North Carolina, 1804—1819. (0.) 

N. York Civ. Code The Code of Civil Procedure of New York, 1850. 

N. York Cr. Code The Code of Criminal Procedure of New York, 1850. 

New Hamp Reports of New Hampshire, 1816 — 1843. (B.) 

Nott & M'C Nott and M'Cord's Rep., S. Carolina, 1817—1820. 2 vols. (B.) 

Ohio R Hammond's Ohio Reports, Ohio, 1821—1839. 9 vols. (D.) 

Pa. St Pennsylvania State Reports, New York and Albany, 1845 — 

1895. 165 vols. (Series still current.) 

Paige Paige's Chan. Rep., New York, 1828—1844. 10 vols. (B.) 

Paine Paine's Rep., United States, 2nd Circuit Court, 1810 — 1826. 

1 vol. (B.) 

Paine & D. Pr. . . Paine and Duer's Practice of the Courts of the United States, 

New York, 1830. 

Peck Peck's Reports, Tennessee, 1822—1824. 1 vol. (D.) 

Penning Pennington's Rep., New Jersey, 1806 — 1813. 2 vols. (0.) 

Pennsylv Reports of Pennsylvania, 1829 — 1832. 3 vols. (B.) 

Pet Peters' Rep., Supreme Courts of United States, 1827 — 1843. 

(A.) 

Pet. 0. 0. R Peters' Circuit Courts Reports, United States, 3rd Circuit Court 

1803—1818. 1vol. (B.) 

Pick Pickering's Rep., Massachusetts, 1823 — 1840. 24 vols. (A.) 

Porter Porter's Reports, Alabama, 1834— 1839. 9 vols. (D.) 

Poth. Obi Pothier on Obligations, by Evans, Philadelphia ed., 1826. 

R The Reports. 

R. R Revised Reports. 

Rand Randolph's Reports, Virgima, 1821 — 1828. 6 vols. (B.) 

Rawle Eawle's Reports, Pennsylvania, 1828 — 1835. 6 vols. (A.) 

Rev. St Revised Statutes of diflferent States in America. 

Ridg. L. & S Ridgway, Lapp and Sohoales' Rep., King's Bench, Irel. 1 vol. 

Ridg. P. C Ridgway's Parliamentary Cases, Irish Parliament. 

Riley Riley's Law Cases, South Carolina, 1836—1837. 1 vol. (B.) 

Soh. & Lef Sohoales and Lefroy's Reports, Chancery, Ireland. 2 vols. 

&R Sergeant and Rawle's Rep., Pennsylv., 1818 — 29. 17 vols. (A.) 



ABBEEVIATIONS, ETC. XIX 

ASBEBVIATIONS. NAME OP 'WOKK, ETO. 

Shepl Shepley'B Eeports, Maine, 1836—1841. 6 vols. (0.) 

South Southard's Reports, New Jersey, 1816—1820. 2 vols. (0.) 

Stair Inst Stair's Institutes of the Law of Scotland. 

Story, E Story's Eeports, United States, 1st Circuit, 1839—1845. 3 

vols. (A.) Judge Story's Decisions. 
S iimn Sumner's Eeports, 1st Circuit Court of United States. Judge 

Story's Decisions. 1830—1839. 3 vols. (A.) 

Swift, Dig Swift's American Digest. 

Swift, Et Swift's American Law of Evidence. Hartford. 

Tait, Ev Tait on Evidence. Edinburgh, 1834. 

U. S United States. 

Verm Vermont's Eeports, Vermont, 1826—1837. 9 vols. (B.) 

Virg. Cas Virginia Cases, Virginia, 1789— 1826. 2 vols. (D.) 

Wall WaUis's Irish Chancery Eeports, 1766-1791, 1 vol.; or in 

references to American Eeports, either Wallace's United 
States Supreme Court Eeports, Washington, 1863 — 1874. 
23 vols. ; or else Wallace's Circuit Court Eeports, Phila- 
delphia, 1801. 1 vol. 

Wall, Jr Philadelphia. 1842—1862. 3 vols. 

Wash Washington's Eeports, Virginia, 1790—1796. 2 vols. (C.) 

Wash. C. C. E. . . Washington's Circuit Court Eeports, United States, 3rd Circuit 
Court, 1803—1827. 4 vols. (B.) 

Watts Watts' Eeports, Pennsylvania, 1832—1840. 10 vols. (A.) 

Watts &S Watts and Sergeant's Eep.,Pennsylv., 1841—1842. 3 vols. (A.) 

Wend. WendaU's Eeports, New York, 1828—1841. (A.) 

Whart Wharton's Eeports, Pennsylvania, 1835 — 1840. 6 vols. (A.) 

Wheat Wheaton's Eep. , Superior Ct. of Un. States, 1816—1827. (A.) 

Wheel. C. C Wheeler's Criminal Cases, New Tork. 3 vols. (D.) 

Woodb. & M Woodbury and Minot's Eeports, United States, 1st Circuit, 

1845—1847. 2 vols. (A.) 
Wright, E Wright's Eeports, Ohio, 1831—1834. 1 vol. (D.) 

Teates Teates' Eeports, Pennsylvania, 1791 — 1808. 4 vols. (B.) 

Yerg. Terger's Eeports, Tennessee, 1832—1837. 10 vols. (D.) 



( ^^i ) 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. 



FAGB 

Aaeonj). Aaron (1849), 3De&. &Sm. 475; 14 Jur. 125 701 

Abbey v. Lill (1829), 2 M. & P. 534 ; 5 Bing. 299 932 

Abbeyleix Gardens v. Sutolifee (1890), 26 L. E. Ir. 332 508 

Abbot V. Hermou (1830), 7 Greenl. 118 524 

Abbot V. Plumbe (1779), 1 Doug. 216 1208 

Abbot V. Wolsey (1895), 14 R. (July) 211 ; (1895), 2 Q. B. 97 ; 72 L. T. 581 ; 

43 W. B. 513 Add. [689, 690] 

Abbott V. Abbott andGodoy (1860), 29 L.J. P. & M. 57 ; 4 S. & T. 254. . 1048, 

1054 
Abbott ji. Bates (1876), 45 L. J. C. P. 117; 33L. T. 491; 24 "W. R. 101. .748, 765 
Abbott V. Hendricks (1840), 1 M. & Or. 791 ; 2 Scott, N. R. 183 ; 1 Drink. 

31; 4 Jur. 1113 758 

Abbott V. Massie (1796). 3 Ves. 148 ; 3 R. R. 79 795 

Abbott V. Middleton (1858), 7 H. L. Cas. 68 ; 28 L. J. Oh. 110 ; 33 L. T. 

66 ; 21 Beav. 143 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 717 741 

Abbotun v. Dansford (1699), 2 Bott, 80 465 

AbeelK. RadoliflE (1816), 13 Johns. 297 673 

Abel V. Potts (1800), 3 Esp. 242 ; 6 R. R. 826 1048 

Abignye v. Clifton (1612), Hob. 213 901 

Abley v. Dale (1850), 10 C. B. 62 ; 1 L. M. & P. 626 ; 20 L. J. 0. P. 33 ; 

14 Jur. 1069 1148 

Aboulofe V. Oppenheimer (1882), 52 L. J. Q. B. 1 ; 10 Q. B. D. 295 ; 47 

L. T. 326 ; 31 "W. R. 57 1142 

Abrath v. North Bast. Ry. Co. (1886), 11 App. Cas. 247 ; 55 L. J. Q. B. 

457 ; 55 L. T. 63 ; 15 Cox, C. C. 364 30, 31, 110, 643 

Abrey v. Crux (1869), L. R. 5 C. P. 37 ; 39 L. J. C. P. 9 ; 21 L. T. 327 . . 757 

Acoero v. Petroni (1815), 1 Stark. 100 922 

Accidental and Mar. Ins. Co., Re (1867), 37 L. J. Ch. 56 ; L. R. 5 Eq. 22; 

17 L. T. 308 845 

Aoebal v. Levy (1834), 10 Bing. 384 ; 4 M. & So. 217 689, 691 

Aokary, Re, Ex parte Bolland (1876), 45 L. J. Bank. 133 ; 3 Ch. D. 125 ; 

34 L. T. 666 ; 24 W. R. 932 851 

Ackland v. Pearce (1811), 2 Camp. 601 317 

Ackworth, Ex parte (1843), 3 Q. B. 397 ; 1 Dowl. & L. 718 ; 1 New Sess. 

Caa.64; 13 L. J. M. 0. 38 ; 18 Jur. 291 1139 

A'Courtv. Cross (1825), 3 Bing. 329; 11 Moore, C. P. 198 ;. 712 

Acraman v. Hemiman (1851), 16 Q. B. 998 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 356 ; 15 Jur. 1008 735 
Acraman v. Morrioe (1849), 8 C. B. 449 ; 19 L. J. C. P. 57 ; 14 Jur. 69 . . 690 

Adam «. Kerr (1798), 1 Bos. & P. 360 1213, 1216 

Adams v. AngeU (1876), 5 Ch. D. 634 ; 36 L. T. 334 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 352 . . 153 

Adams v. Baloh (1827), 5 Greenl. 188 1(198 

Adams «>. Barnes (1821), 17 Mass. 365 1114 

Adams ». Barry (1843), 2 T. & C. (Ch.) 167 601 

Adams v. Dansey (1830), 6 Bing. 506 ; 4 M. & P. 245 678 

Adams v. Frye (1841), 3 Mete. 103 1201 

Adams v. Gibney (1830), 6 Bing. 656 ; 4 M. & P. 491 773 

Adams «!. Jones (1862), 21 L. J. Ch. 352 797 

Adams v. Lloyd (1858), 3 H. & N. 351 ; 27 L. J. Ex. 499; 4 Jur, N. S. 590 964 

Adams v. Sanders (1829), M. & M. 373 ; 4 C. & P. 25 552 

Adams v. Wordley (1836), 1 M. & W. 374 ; 2 Gale, 29 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 158 ; 

IT. &G. 620 , 743, 757 

Adamson, Re (1875), L. R. 3 P. & D. 253 146 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



XXU TABLE OP CASES CITED. 

PAGE 

Adamthwaite v. Synge (1816), 1 Stark. 183 1018 

Addington v. Clode (1774-5), 2 Wm. Bl. 1030 &9* 

Addingtoni). Magau(1851), IOC. B. 576; 20L. J. C. P. 82 192 

Adelaide, The (1799), 2 Robertson, 611 1095 

Admiral Austen, Re (1852), 2 C. Rob. 112, n. .'. 192 

Admiral Boxer, The (1857), Swab. 193 178 

Aflalo V. Fourdrinier (1829), M. & M. 334, n 314 

Agnew V. Jobson (1878), 47 L. J. M. C. 67 ; 13 Cox, C. C. 625 226 

AgraBk. i>. Barry (1874), L. R. 7 H.L. 155; Ir. E. 8Eq. 325 737 

Agricultural Cattle Ins. Co. v. Fitzgerald (1861), 14 Q. B. 432 ; 20 L. J. 

Q. B. 244 ; 15 Jur. 489 294, 1197 

Aheam v. Bellman (1879), L. R. 4 Ex. D. 201 ; 40 L. T. 771 ; 27 W. R. 

928 ;..... 523 

Ahearne v. M'Gmre (1840), 2 Ir. Eq. R. 437 867 

Ainsworth, Re (1870), L. R. 2 P. & D. 151 .■ 699 

Airth Peer. (1839), Pari. Min. 105 423 

Aitken, Ex parte (1820), 4 B. & Aid. 49 594 

Alban v. Pritohett (1796), 6 T. R. 680 604 

Albert v. The Grosvenor Invest. Co. (1867), L. R. 3 Q. B. 123 ; 37 L. J. 

Q. B. 24 ; 8 B. & S. 664 751 

Alehin «. Hopkins (1834), 1 Bing. N. C. 99 ; 4 M. & So. 615 •. . . 682 

Alcoek V. Cook (1829), 1 Ph. Evid. 251, n. 1 404, 1040 

Alcook V. The Roy. Exch. Ins. Co. (1849), 13 Q. B. 292 ; 18 L. J. Q. B. 

121 ; 13 Jur. 445 924, 926, 949 

Alcook V. Whatmore (1840), 8 Dowl. 615 15 

Alcorn V. Larkin (1842), Arm. M. & 0. 367 1023 

Alder v. SavUl (1814), 5 Taun. 454 ; 15 R. R. 551 1160 

Alderson v. Clay (1816), 1 Stark. R. 405 169, 288, 526 

Alderson v. Langdale (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 660 1194 

Alderson v. Maddison (1877), 8 App. Cas. 467 ; 52 L. J. Q. B. 737 ; 49 L. 

T. 303 ; 31 "W. R. 820 ; 47 J. P. 821 539, 688 

Aldous V. ComweU (1868), L. R.. 3 Q. B. 573 ; 37 L. J. Q. B. 201 ; 9 B. 

& S. 607 1195, 1201 

Aldridge v. Gt. "W. Ey. Co. (1864), 15 C. B. N. S. 582 ; 33 L. J. C. P. 

161 , 729 

Aldridge v. Haines (1831), 2 B. & Ad. 395 1099 

Aldridge v. Johnson (1857), 7 E. & B. 885 ; 26 L. J. Q. B. 296 ; 3 Jur. 

N. S. 913 690 

Alexander «. Burchfield (1842), 7 M. & Gr. 1066 ; 3 Scott, N. R. 555 ; 

Car. & M. 75 ; 11 L. J. C. P. 253 32, 33 

Alexander v. Calder (1885), 54 L. J. Ch. 487 ; 28 Ch. D. 457 ; 33 W. R. 579 912 

Alexander v. Crosbie (1835), Lloyd & G. (temp. Sugden) 145 749 

Alexander v. Dixon (1823), 1 Bing. 366 ; 8 Moore, 387 816 

Alexander v. Strong (1842), 9 M. & W. 733 ; 11 L. J. Ex. 316 ; 2 Dowl. 

P. C. 256 307 

Alexander v. Vanderzee (1872), L. E. 7 C. P. 530 ; 20 W. E. 871 42 

Alexandria, Mechanics' Bk. of, v. Bk. of Columbia (1820), 6 Wheat. 336 . . 388 

Alfonso V. U. S. (1843), 2 Story R. 421 278 

Alford V. Clay (1876), Ir. E. 9 Eq. 215 462 

AUvon V. Pumival (1834), 1 C. M. & E. 277, 296 ; 3 L. J. Ex. 241 ; 4 

Tyr. 751 278, 306, 309, 1024 

Allan's Patent, Re (1867), L. E. 1 P. C. 507 ; 36 L. J. P. C. 76 129 

Allen, Ee (1839), 2 Curt. 331 694 

Aliens;. Benuet (1810), 3 Taun. 169; 12 R. R. 633 672, 675 

Allen V. Cameron (1833), 3 Tyr. 907 ; 1 C. & M. 832 223 

Allen V. Deustone (1839), 8 C. & P. 760 388 

Allen p. Duncan (1831), 11 Pick. 309 376 

Aliens). Dundas (1789), 3 T. R. 126; 1 E. E. 666 1045,1103,1133,1161 

Allen V. D. of Hamilton (1867), L. E. 2 C. P. 630 ; 15 W. R. 866 829 

Aliens;. Maddock (1858), 11 Moo. P. C. C. 427 701, 785 

Allen V. M'Keen (1833), 1 Sumn. 314 623 

Allen V. Pink (1838), 4 M. & W. 140 ; 6 Dowl. 668 ; 1 H. & H. 207 ; 7 L. 
J. Ex. 206 745 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. XXUl 

PAGE 

Allen V. Sayward (1828), 5 Greenl. 227 90 

Allen V. Yoxall (1844), 1 C. & Kir. 315 819 

Alliance Bank of Simla v. Carey (1870), 5 C. P. D. 249 ; 49 L. J. C. P. 

781 ; 29 W. R. 306 76 

Alluutt, Re (1864), 33 L. J. P. & M. 86 701 

AUport'D. Meek (1830), 4 0. & P. 267 1224 

Almosnino, Re (I860), 29 L. J. P. & M. 46 ; 39 L. T. 19 ; 8 W. R. 29 ; 6 

Jur. N. S. 302 701, 786 

Alner v. George (1808), 1 Camp. 392 552, 744 

Alston, In the Goods of (1892), P. 142 ; 61 L. J. P. 92 ; 66 L. T. 591 174 

Alvord 11. Baker (1832), 9 Wend. 323 154 

Amalia, The (1864), Brown & L. Adm. 311 185 

Ambrose Rookwood's Case (1696), 13 How. St. Tr. 139 236 

American Fur Co. v. V. S. (1829), 2 Peters, 358 382 

Aniey v. Long (1808), 9 East, 473 ; 6 Esp. 116 ; 1 Camp. 14 ; 9 R. R. 589 814 

Amherst, Ld. v. Ld. Somers (1788), 2 T. R. 372 ; 1 R. R. 497 1101 

Amiss, Be (1849), 2 Roberts. 116 700 

Amos V. Hughes (1835), 1 M. & Rob. 464 258, 259 

Amos V. Smith (1867, should be 1862), 31 L. J. Ex. 423 ; 1 H. & C. 238. . 715 

Anchor Milling Co. v. Walsh (1891), 32 Am. St. R. 600 Add. [460] 

Anderson v. Anderson (1872), 41 L. J. Oh. 247 ; L. R. 13 Eq. 381 ; 26 

L. T. 12 ; 20 W- R. 313 701 

Anderson v. Gill (1858), 3 Maoq. 180 ; 1 Paterson, 738 170, 262 

Anderson v. Gorrie, 14 R. (Feb.) 283 ; 71 L. T. 382 1099 

Anderson v. Hamilton (1816), 8 Price, 244; 4 Moore, C. P. 593, n. ; 2 

Pro. & B. 156, u 618 

Anderson v. Hayman (1789), 1 H. Bl. 120 ; 2 R. R. 734 678 

Anderson v. Long (1823), 10 Serg. & R. 55 252 

Anderson v. Pitcher (1800), 2 Bos. & P. 164 ; 3 Esp. 134 ; 1 Stark. 262 ; 

6 R. R. 665 783 

Anderson v. Sanderson (1817), 2 Stark. R. 204 ; Holt, 591 ; 17 R. R. 681 . 603 

Anderson v. Soot (1806), 1 Camp. 235, n 690 

Anderson v. Thornton (1853), 8 Ex. 425 201, 542 

Anderson v. Wef-ton (1840), 6 Bing. N. 0. 296 146, 451 

Anderson v. Whalley (1852), 3 C. & K. 64 925 

Anderston v. Magawley (1726), 2 Bro. P. 0. 588 , 1040 

Andrew v. Motley (1862), 12 C. B. N. S. 526 ; 32 L. J. C. P. 128. .278, 431, 1215 

Andrews f. Andrews (1884-5), 15 L. R. Ir. 199, 211 , 793, 797 

Andrews v. Andrews (see Ke D'Angibau). 

Andrews v. Askey (1837), 8 0. & P. 7 253, 254, 257, 951, 954 

Andrews v. Elliot (1866), 5 E. & B. 502 ; 6 E. & B. 338 ; 25 L. J. Q. B. 

336 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 663 ; 543 

Andrews v. Hailes (1853), 2 E. & B. 349 ; 22 L. J. Q. B. 409 ; 17 Jur. 761 116 

Andrews v. Martin (1862),' 12 C. B. N. S. 371 ; 6 L. T. 433 869, 871 

Andrews v. Palmer (1812), 1 Ves. & B. 22 329 

Andrews v. Solomon (1816), 1 Peters C. 0. Rep. 356 598 

Andrews v. Turner (1842), 3 Q. B. 177 708, 709 

Andrews v. Vanduzer (1814), 11 Johns. 38 266 

AngeU 1). Duke (1876), L. R. 10 Q. B. 174 ; 44 L. J. Q. B. 78 ; 32 L. T. 

25 ; 23 W. R. 307 683, 754 

Angell 1). Worsley (1849), 2 Ex. 196, n 146 

Anglesey (M. of) v. Ld. Hatherton (1842), 10 M. & W. 218 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 

67 231, 232, 402, 403 

Ai.glo-French Co-operative Soc, Re (1880), 14 Ch. D. 633 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 

388 ; 28 W. R. 680 36 

Angus V. Dalton (1881), 3 Q. B. D. 85 ; 6 App. Oas. 740 ; 50 L. J. Q. B. 

689 ; 44 L. T. 844; SOW. R. 196 115 

Angus V. Smith (1829), M. & M. 473 964 

Ann, The (1860), Lush. Adm. R. 55 185 

Annapolis, The (I860), Lush. Adm. R. 295 ; 30 L. J. Adm. 201 ; 4 L. T. 

417 178, 976, 977 

Annesley v. Ld. Anglesea (1743), 17 How. St. Tr. 1430 . .65, 81, 108, 368, 592, 

606, 610, 892, 976, 977 

Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



XXiy TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PA8B 

Annett v. Osborne (1840), 2 Jebb & Sy. 376 31 

Anon, (undated), cited 3 Esp. 115 545 

Auon. undated), E.y. & M. 143 1227 

Anon, (undated), 1 Ph. Ev. 406 569 

Anon, (undated), cited 2 Ph. Ev. 523 976 

Anon, (undated), cited 6 East, 195 ; 8 E. E. 455 464 

Anon. (1623), 2 EoUe R. 255 114 

Anon. (1670), 11 Mod. 79 9 

Anon. (1693), Skin. 404 592, 696 

Anon. (1698), 1 Ld. Eaym. 731 108 

Anon. (1748), 3 Atk. 644 612 

Anon. (1763J, 1 Lew. 101 923 

Anon. (1764), cited 5 B. & Aid. 939, 940, n 629 

Anon. (1799), 12 Mod. 345 9 

Anon. (1807, Burr's Trial), Evid. for Deft., 2 616 

Anon. (1808), cited 2 Ph. Ev. 29 1117 

Anon (1810), cited 2 Camp. 390 n 1161 

Anon. (1811), 8 Mass. 370 604 

Anon. (1827), 1 Moo. C. C. 101 924 

Anon. (1830), 1 B. & Ad. 382 1100 

Anon. (1832), 1 Dowl. 157 870, 872 

Anon. (1833), 1 Lew. C. 0. 128, 133, 134 824, 825 

Anon. (1833), 1 HiU, S. 0. 251 972, 973 

Anon. (1841), li. C. E. 165, 167, n. (a) 238 

Anon. (1841), 3 Ir. L. R. 301 871 

Anon. (1841), Ir. 0. E. 374 165 

Anon. (1846), cited BuU. N. P. 236 b 1228 

Auon. (1878), cited Campbell v. Twemlow, 1 Price, 88 890 

Anon. V. Anon. (1856), 22 Beav. 481 ; 23 Beav. 273 621 

An8teei;.Nehnes(1853),lH.&N.225; 26L.J.Ex.5; 27L.T.190; 4W.E.612 787 

Anstey v. Dowsing (1745-6), 2 Str. 1253 ; Bull. N. P. 264 279 

Antram v. Chace (1812), 15 East, 209 ; 1 Rose, 344 1038 

Apoth. Co. V. Bentley (1824), Ry. & M. 159 ; 1 C. & P. 538 267 

Appleton V. Ld. Braybrook (1817), 6 M. & S. 34 ; 2 Stark. R. 6 ; 18 R. R. 294 52 

Appotens v. Dunswell (1699), 2 Bott, 80 465 

Aranguerin v. Scholfield (1856), 1 H. & N. 494 ; 28 L. T. 0. S. 105 308 

Arbon v. Eussell (1862), 1 N. E. 31 ; 9 Jur. N". S. 753 ; 11 W. R. 26 ; 7 

L. T. 718 133 

Arohangelo v. Thomson (1811), 2 Camp. 620 ; 12 E. R. 758 154 

Archer, Re (1871), L. E. 2P. &D. 252; 40 L.J. P. & M. 80; 19 W. E. 785 699 

Archer v. Baynes (1850), 5 Ex. 626 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 64 670, 672 

Archer v. Leonard (1863), 15 Ir. Ch. E. 267 » 710, 711 

Ardeu t!. Sullivan (1850), 14 Q. B. 832 ; 19 L. J. Q. B. 268 ; 14 Jur. 712. . 654 

Arding v. Flower (1800), 8 T. R. 536 ; 3 Esp. 117 866, 869 

ArgoU, Ly. v. Cheney (1624), Palmer, 402 ,. , 1200 

Arklow, The {see Emery v. Cichero). 

Arlett V. Ellis (or ShefEord) (1827), 7 B. & C. 346 ; 9 D. & E. 897 ; 9 B. & 

C. 671 115 

Armistead v. Wilde (1851), 17 Q. B. 261 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 624 ; 15 Jur. 

1010 162 

Armory ». Delamirie (1721), 1 Str. 505 ; 1 Sm. L. C. 385 108, 117, 361 

Armstrong, Re, Ex parte Lindsay, (1892) 1 Q. B. 327 ; 65 L. T. 464 ; 40 

W. R. 159 ; 17 Cox, C. C. 349 ; 8 M. B. R. 271 36 

Armstrong v. Hewett (1817), 4 Price, 216 ; 18 R. R. 707 430, 1050 

Armstrongs. Norton (1839), 2 Ir. L. E. 96 1113 

Armstrong v. Stockham (1835), 24 L. J. Ch. 176 ; 3 Eq. Rep. 130 1030 

Arnit's Trusts, Re (1868), Ir. Rep. 5 Eq. 352 100 

Arnold V. Bp. of Bath &W. (1829), 5 Bing. 316 ; 2 M. & P. 550 . 1050 

Arnold v. Blaker (1871), 40 L. J. Q. B. 185 ; L. E. 6 Q. B. 433 ; 19 W. E 

1090 124 

Amoldi). Harael(1854),9Ex. 404; 2C. L. E. 499; 23L. J.Ex. 137..40 226 227 
Arnold v. Holbrook (1873), L. R. 8 Q. B. 96 ; 42 L. J. Q. B. 80 ; 28 L T 

23; 21 W. E. 330 124 

The refer encea are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. XXV 

PAQB 

Arnold v. May. of Poole (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 860 ; 12 L. J. C. P. 97 ; 7 Jur. 

653 ; 5 Soott, N. R. 741 ; 2 Dowl. N. S. 574 639, 640, 644, 645 

Arnott». Hayes (1887), 36 Ch. D. 731; 66 L. J. Cli. 844 ; 57 L. T. 299 ; 36 

W. R. 246 1062 

Arnott ». Redfem (1826), 3 Bing. 353; 2 0. & P. 88 ; 11 Moore, 0. P. 

209 1163, 1164 

Amsby v. Woodward (1827), 6 B. & C. 519 : 9 Dowl. & R. 636 622 

Aronegary v. Lambonade (1881), 50 L. J. P. C. 28 ; 6 App. Gas. 364 ; 44 

L. T. 895 149 

Arundell v. Ld. Falmoutli (1814), 2 M. & Sel. 440 ; 15 R. R. 306 404 

Arundell v. Wiite (1811), 14 East, 218 1033 

Ash, Re (1866), Deane's Ece. R. 181 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 526 701 

Ashby V. Bates (1846), 16 M. & W. 589 ; 4 Dowl. & L. 33 259 

Ashby V. James (1843), 11 M. & W. 542 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 296 716 

Ashoroft V. Morrin (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 450 ; 6 Jur. 783 671, 675 

Asher v. Wtitelock (1865), 35 L. J. Q. B. 17 ; L. R. 1 Q. B. 1 ; 13 L. T. 

264; 11 Jnr. N. 8. 925 118 

Ashforth v. Redford (1873), L. R. 9 C. P. 20 ; 43 L. J. C. P. 57 42 

Ashburst ». Mill (1848), 7 Hare, 602 ; 12 Jur. 693, 1035 749 

Asblin V. Lee (1876), 44 L. J. Ch. 376 ; 32 L. T. 348 ; 23 W. R. 458 ... . 721 
Ashling V. Boon, (1891), 1 Ch. 568 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 306 ; 64 L. T. 193 ; 39 

W. R. 298 281 

Ashmore, Re (1843), 3 Curt. 758 696 

Ashmore v. Hardy (1836), 7 C. & P. 501 517 

Ashpitel V. Bryan (1864), 32 L. J. Q. B. 91 ; 33 L. J. Q. B. 328 ; 3 B. & 

S. 474; 5 B. &S. 723; 3 P. & F. 183; 11 L. T. 221; 12 W. R 1082.. 548 
Ashpitel «;. Seroombe (1850), 5 Ex. 147 ; 6 Rail. C. 224; 19 L.J. Ex. 82. .44, 526 
Ashrufood Dowlah Ahmed v. Hyder Hossein Khan (1885), 11 Moore, Ind. 

App. C. 94 101 

Ashton, In goods of, (1892) P. 83 ; 61 L. J. P. 85 ; 67 L. T. 325 739, 740 

Ashton V. Ld. Langdale (1851), 4 De Gex & Sm. 402, n 684 

Ashton's case (1845), 7 Q. B. 169 811 

Ashwell V. Lomi (1850), L. R. 2 P. & D. 477 136 

Ashworth v. Munn (1878), 15 Ch. D. 363 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 747 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 

107 ; 43 L. T. 553 ; 28 W. R. 965 683 

Ashworth v. Outram (1877), 5 Ch. D. 923 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 687 ; 25 W. R. 

896 ; 37 L. T. 86 ; 36 L. T. 400 663 

Asliu V. Parkin (1768), 2 Burr. 665 1113 

Aspden v. Seddon (1875), 44 L. J. Ch. 369 ; L. R. 10 Ch. App. 394 ; 31 

L. T. 626 ; 32L. T. 415; 20 W. R. 680 ; 114 

Astbury t.. Belbin (1850), 3 K. & C. 20 871 

Aste V. Stumore (1884), 53 L. J. Q. B. 82 ; 13 Q. B. D. 326 ; 49 L. T. 742 ; 

32 W. R. 219 ; 5 Asp. M. C. 175 769 

Aston, Ex parte (1859), 28 L. J. Ch. 631 ; 4 De Gex & J. 220 ; 27 Beav. 

474 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 779 965 

Astor V. Union Ins. Co. (1827), 7 Cowen, 202 763 

Atalanta, The (1808), 6 Co. Rob. Adm. 440, 464 102 

Atchinsou v. Baker (1797), Peake, Add. Cas. 103 163 

Atnhley v. Sprigg (1864), 33 L. J. Ch. 346 ; 10 L. T. 16 ; 12 W. R 364 ; 

10 Jur. N. S. 144 101, 422, 621 

Athenry Peer. (1836). Pari. Min. 45 425 

Atherfold v. Beard (1788), 2 T. R. 610 ; 1 R. R. 656 996 

Atherley v. Harvey (1877), 46 L. J. Q. B. 518 ; 2 Q. B. D. 524 ; 36 L. T. 

551; 25W. R. 727.... 961,1182 

Athlone Peer. (1841), 8 CI. & Pin. 262 1048 

Atkins 11. Curwood (1837), 7 C. & P. 767 166 

Atkins V. Hatton (1794), 2 Anst. 386 ; 3 Gwill. 1406 ; 4 "Wood's Decrees, 

410 ; 2 Eag. & Y. 403 ; 3 R. R. 589 430, 1050 

Atkins V. Meredith (1836), 4 Dowl. P. C. 658 314 

Atkins V. Palmer (1821), 4 B. & Ad. 377 347, 348 

Atkins ». Tredgold (1823), 2 B. & C. 23 ; 3 D. & R. 200 492, 493 

Atkins V. Ld. Willoughby de Broke (1794), 4 Wood's Decrees, 424 ; 2 Anst. 

397 ; 3 R. R. 691 ^30 

fol. J. ends with page 033. 



XXVI TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAGB 

Atkinson v. Littlewood (1874), L. R. 18 Eq. 595 ; 31 L. T. 225 806 

Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hutli (1880), lb Ch. D. 474; 44 L. T. 67; 29 

W. R. 387 179 

Atter«>. Atkinson (1869), -L.R. 1 P. & D. 665; 20 L. T. 404 141 

Att.-Gen. v. Ashe (1859), 10 Ir. Ch. R. 309 320 

Att.-Gen. v. Bond (1839), 9 C. & P. 1S9 956 

Att.-Gen. v. Boston (1847), 1 De G. & Sm. 519 791 

Att.-Gen. V. Bowman (1791), 2 B. & P. 532, n. (a) 252 

Att.-Gen. I). Bradlaugh (1885), 14 Q. B. D. 667; 54 L. J. Q. B. 205 ; 52 

L. T. 589 ; 33 W. R. 673 ; 49 J. P. 500 899, 901, 903 

Att.-Gen. V. Brazenose Coll. (1834), 2 CI. & Fin. 295 ; 8 Bligh, N. S. 377 ; 

1 L. J. Ch. 66 791 

Att.-Gen. v. Briant (1846), 15 M. & W. 169 ; 15 L. J. Ex. 265 613, 614 

Att.-Gen. V. May. of Bristol (1820). 2 Jao. & W. 294 790 

Att.-Gen. v. Bulpit (1821), 9 Price, 4 918 

Att.-Gen. v. Bunoe fl868), L. R. 6 Eq. 663 ; 37 L. J. Ch. 697 ; 18 L. T. 742 77 

Att.-Gen. 4'. Calvert (1857), 23 Beav. 248; 26L. J.Ch. 682; 3 Jur. N. S. 500 138 

Att.-Gen. t'. Cast Plate Glass Co. (1792), 1 Anstr. 39 ; 3 Rev. R. 543 ... . 765 
Att.-Gen. V. Chambers (1854), 23 L. J. Ch. 662; 4 De G. M. & G. 206 ; 

2 Eq. Rep. 1195 ; 2 W. R. 636 112 

Att.-Gen. V. Clapham (1854), 4 De G. M. & G. 691 ; 24 L. J. Ch. 177 ; 

1 Jur. N. S. 505 791 

Att.-Gen. v. Clero (1844), 12 M. & W. 640 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 82 201 

Att.-Gen. v. Dakin (1869), 36 L. J. Ex. 167 ; 37 L. J. Ex. 150 ; 39 L. J. 

Ex. 113 ; L. R. 4 E. & I. App. 338 4 

Att.-Gen. v. Davison (1825), M'Clel. & Y. 160 325 

Att.-Gen. v. Donaldson (1842), 10 M. & W. 117; 11 L. J. Ex. 338 4 

Att.-Gen. V. Drummond (1842, should be 1849), 2 H. of L. Cas. 862 . .784, 791 

Att.-Gen. iJ. Drummond (1842), 1 Dr. & "War. 3.^3 786 

Att.-Gen. V. Emerson (1882), 52 L. J. Q. B. 67; 10 Q. B. D. 191; 48 

L. T. 18; 31 W. R. 191 1183 

Att.-Gen. v. Ewelme Hospital (1853), 17 Beav. 366 ; 22 L. J. Ch. 846 . . 123 

Att.-Gen. v. Fadden (1815), 1 Price, 403 837 

Att.-Gen. v. GaskUl (1882), 20 Ch. D. 519 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 870; 46 L. T. 

180 ; 30 "W. R. 558 660 

Att.-Gen. V. Grote (1827), 2 Russ. & My. 699 785 

Att.-Gen. V. H^wkes (1830), 1 Tyr. 3 ; 1 Cr. & J. 121 216 

Att.-Gen. v. Hitchcock (1847), 1 Ex. 93 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 259 ; 11 Jur. 478.. 949, 

950, 952, 953 

Att.-Gen. v. Kohler (1861), 9 H. of L. Cas. 660 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 467 416 

Att.-Gen. ■:,. Lambe (1838), 3 Y. & C. (Ex.) 162 ; 8 L. J. Ex. 323 ; 2 Jur. 

698 1183 

Att.-Gen. v. Le Merchant (1772), 2 T. R. 201, n , , 310 

Att.-Gen. v. Corp. of London (1850), 2 Hall & T. 1 : 2 Mac. & G. 247 ; 19 

L. J. Ch. 314; 14 Jur. 205 1183 

Att.-Gen. v. Metrop. Dist. Ry. Co. (1883), L. R. 5 Ex. D. 218 ; 42 L. T. 

342 ; 28 W. R. 376 911 

Att.-Gen. v. Murdoch (1852). 1 De G. M. & G. 86 ; 21 L. J. Ch. 694 .... 791 

Att.-Gen. ■^. Naylor (1864), 33 L. J. Ch. 151 ; 1 H. & M. 809 538 

Att.-Gen. V. North Metropolitan Tram. Co. (1895), 72 L. T. 340 ..Add. [1182] 

Att.-Gen. ■„. Parker (1747), 3 Atk. 577 791 

Att.-Gen. v. Pamther (1792), 3 Brown, C. C. 443 170 

Att -Gen. ■</. Earl of Powis (1863), Kay, 186 ; 24 L. J. Ch. 218 784 

Att.-Gen. v. RadloflE (1854), 10 Ex. 84; 23 L. J. Ex. 240; 10 Jur. 555; 

2C. L. R. 1116 252, 884, 970 

Att.-Gen. v. Ray (1843), 2 Hare, 618 353 

Att.-Gen. v. Riddle (1832), 2 C. & J. 493 : 2 Tyr. 523 107 

Att.-Gen. V. St. Cross. Hosp. (1853), 17 Beav. 435 ; 22 L. J. Ch. 793 .... 791 

Att.-Gen. ■„. Sidney Sussex Coll. (1869). 38 L. J. Ch. 657 790 

Att.-Gen. t. Sitwell (1835), 1 Y. & C. Ex. 559 ; 5 L. J. Ex. Eq. 86 750 

Att.-Gen. V. Skinners' Co. (1837;, Cooper C. P. 1 870, 871 

Att -Gen. v. Stephens (1855), 6 De G. M. & G. 141 ; 25 L. J. Ch. 888 ; 

2 Jur. N. S. 51 99, 442,443, 537 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OP CASES CITED. xxvii 

PAGE 

Att.-Gren. v. Sullivan (1842), 1 Arm. M. & 0. 294 919 

Att -Gen. v. Theakstone (1820), 8 Price, 89 18, 1093 

Att.-Gen. v. Thompson (1849), 8 Hare, 106 1183 

Att.-Gen. v. Tomline (1877), 5 Ch. D. 750 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 654; 36 L. T. 

684 ; 25 W. R. 802 ; 15 Ch. D. 150 ; 43 L. T. 486 116 

Att.-Gen. w.Whitwood Local Bd. (1870), 40 L. J. Ch. 592; 19W.R. 1107.. 1189 

Att.-Gen. f . Wilson (1839), 9 Sim. 526 ; 8 L. J. Ch. 1 19 813 

Att.-Gen. of Prince of Wales v. Grossman (1866), 4 H. & C. 568 ; L. K. 
1 Ex. 381 ; 35 L. J. Ex. 215 ; 14 L. T. 856 ; 14 W. R. 996 ; 12 Jur. 

N. S 712 : : 275 

Attree v. Hawe (1878), 9 Ch. D. 337 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 863 ; 26 W. R. 871 ; 

38 L. T. 733 684 

Attridge, Re (1848), 6 Notes of Cases (Eoo. & Mar.), 597 698 

Attwood V. Small (1838), 6 CI. & Fin. 234 486 

Attwood V. Taylor (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 289 ; 1 Scott, N. R. 611 10:^5 

Attwood V. Welton (1828), 7 Conn. 66 950 

Aubert v. Walsh (1812), 4 Taun. 293 '. 154 

Auckland, The Earl of (1861), 30 L. J. P. M. & A. 121 ; Lush. Adm. 164 ; 
{nom. Malcomson v. Baldock) 15 Moo. P. C. C. 304 ; 5 L. T. 558 ; 10 

W. R. 124 178 

Auckland, Maid of, Re (1848), 6 Notes of Cases (Eoc. & M.) 240 1122 

Audley, Ld., case of (1631), 3 How. St. Tr. 402 893 

Augusta, Bk. of v. Earle (1839), 13 Pet. 690 16 

Augustien v. Challis (1847), 1 Ex. 280 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 73 285, 288 

Austee (should be Anstee) v. Nelms (1853), 1 H. & N. 225 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 5 ; 

27 L. T. 190 ; 4 W. R. 612 787 

Austen, Admiral, Re (1852), 3 Roberts. 611 702 

Austin, Ex parte (1876), 4 Ch. D. 13 ; 46 L. J. Bkv. 1 ; 35 L. T. 529 ; 25 

W. R. 51 849 

Austin V. Bunyard (1865), 4 P. & F. 253 ; 6 B. & S. 687; 34 L. J. Q. B. 

217 546 

Austin V. Chambers (1837-8), 6 CI. & Fin. 1 486 

Austin V. Evans (1841), 2 M. & Gr. 430 814 

Austin V. Guard, of Bethnal Green (1874) L. R. 9 C. P. 91 ; 43 L. J. C. P. 

100 ; 29 L. T. 807 ; 22 W. R. 406 642 

Austin V. Mead (1880), 15 Ch. D. 651 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 30 ; 43 L. T. 117 ; 28 

W. R. 891 638 

Austini). Ol8en(1868), 37L. J.M. C. 34; L. R. 3 Q. B. 208 ; 9B. &S. 461 ; 

16 W. R. 426 77 

Austin V. Rumsey (1849), 2 C. & Kir. 736 329, 1216 

Australasia, Bk. of, v. BreUlat (1847), 6 Moore, P. C. R. 152 ; 12 Jur. 

189 160 

Australasia, Bk. of, v. Harding (1850), 19 L. J. C. P. 345 ; 9 0. B. 661 . . 1155 

Australasia, Bk. of, v. Nias (1851), 16 Q. B. 717 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 284 1154 

Australian Roy. Mail St. Nav. Co. v. Marzetti (1855), 11 Ex. 228 ; 24 L. J. 

Ex. 273 642, 645 

Aveliue «). Whisson (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 801 ,; 12 L. J. C. P. 158 654 

Avery v. Pixley (1808), 4 Mass. 462 706 

Aveson v. Ld. Kinnaird (1805), 6 East, 188; 2 Smith, 286; 8 E. R. 455. .374, 

464, 591 

Awdley v. Awdley (1690), 2 Vem. 194 482 

Aykroyd, Re (1847), 1 Ex. 479 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 157 ; 5 Dowl. & L. 701. . . . 112S 
Aylesford, Ld., ». Morris (1873), L. R. 8 Ch. App. 490 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 646 ; 

28 L. T. 541 ; 21 W. R. 424 137 

Aylesford Peer. (1885), 11 App. Cas. 1 416, 621 

Ayliffe v. Tracy (1722), 2 P. Wms. 65 680 

Aynsley ». Glover (1875), 44 L. J. Ch. 523 ; L. R. 10 Ch. App. 283 ; 32 

L. T. 345 ; 23 W. R. 457 76 

Ayrey v. Davenport (1807), 2 Bos. & P. N. R. 474 1031 

Ayrey ». Hill (1824), 2 Add. 209 170 

Ayrton v. Abbott (1849), 14 Q. B. 1 ; 18 L. J. Q. B. 314 ; 14 Jur. 314 . . 1099, 

1136 
Ayton V. Bolt (1827), 4 Bing. 106 712 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



XXVIU TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PA8B 

B., falsely called B. v. B. (1875), Ir. R. 9 Eq. 551 167 

Babb V. Cleineon (1825), 12 Serg. & R. 328 514 

Babbage v. Babbage (1870), L. R. 2 P. & D. 222 881 

Babington v. Mahony (1837), 6 Law Rec. 2nd Ser. 232, n 870 

Backhouse, In re (1841), 3 Ir. L. R. 301 871 

Backhouse v. Alcook (1885), 28 Ch. D. 669 ; 54 L. J. Ch. 842 ; 52 L. T. 

342 ; 33 W. R. 407 913 

Backhouse v. Bonomi (1861), 28 L. J. Q. B. 378 ; 1 E. B. & E. 622, 654 ; 

6 Jur. N. S. 1345 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 1182 ; 32 L. T. 156 ; 9 H. of L. 0. 503 ; 

34 L. J. Q. B. 181 ; 9 W. R. 769 114 

Backhouse v. Jones (1839), 6 Bing. N. C. 65 ; 8 Scott, 148 230, 369 

Bacon v. Bacon (1876), 34 L. T. 349 602 

Baoon v. Chesney (1816), 1 Stark. N. P. Rep.' 192 508, 552 

Baddeley v. Mortlook (1816), Holt, N. P. Rep. 151 ; 17 R. R. 626 256 

Bagot V. Bagot (1878), 1 L. E. Ir. 308 240, 349 

Bapot V. Easton (1877), 47 L. J. Ch. 225 ; 7 Ch. D. 1 ; 37 L. T. 369 ; 26 

W. R. 66 187 

Bagot, Ld., ». Williams (1824), 3 B. & C. 235; 5 D. & Ry. 87 1123,1124 

Bagueley v. Hawley (1867), L. R. 2 C. P. 625 ; 36 L. J. C. P. 328 ; 17 

L. T. 116 775 

Bahia, The (1865), L. R. 1 Adm. & Eco. 15; 11 Jur. N. S. 1008; 14 

W. R. 411 818 

Bahia & Erancisco Ry. Co., Re v. Tritten (1868), 37 L. J. Q. B. 176; L. R. 

3 Q. B. 584 ; 9 B. & S. 844 ; 18 L. T. 467 ; 16 W. R. 802 541 

Baildon v. Walton (1847), 1 Ex. 617 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 357 480, 717 

Bailey, Ex parte, and Ex parte ColHer (1854), 23 L. J. M. C. 161 ; 3 E. & 

B. 607 132, 1136 

B.ailey, Ex parte, In re Barrell (1852), 22 L. J. Bank. 45 ; 1 W. R. 343. . 83 

Bailey, Re (1S38), 1 Curteis, 914 700 

Bailey v. Appleyard (1838), 8 A. & E. 161 ; 3 N. & P. 257 ; 1 W. W. & H. 

208 ; 2 Jur. 872 207 

Bailey v. BeUamy (1841), 9 Dowl. 507 ; 10 L. J. Q. B. 41 733 

Bailey w. Bidwell (1844), 13 M. & W. 73 ; 13 L. J. Ex. 264 262, 1210 

BaOey v. Bodenham (1864), 16 C. B. N. S. 288 ; 33 L. J. C. P. 252 ; 10 

Jur. N. S. 821 ; 10 L. T. 422 ; 12 W. R. 865 32 

Bailey v. Edwards (1865), 34 L. J. Q. B. 41 ; 4 B. & S. 761 ; 11 Jur. 

N. S. 134 758 

Bailey «. Harris (1849), 12 Q. B. 905; 18 L. J. Q. B. 115 1104 

Bailey v. Hyde (1820), 3 Conn. 463 255 

Bailey f. Macaulay (1849), 13 Q. B. 815; 19 L. J. Q. B. 73; 14 Jur. 80 541, 

617 
Bailey v. Sweeting (1861), 30 L. J. C. P. 160 ; 9 C. B. N. S. 843 ; 9 W. R. 

273 673 

BailUe v. Jackson (1853), 3 De G. M. & G. 38 ; 10 Hare (Appendix) xlvi ; 

22 L. J. Ch. 753 ; 1 W. R. 196 ; 19 Jur. 170 13 

Baillie v. Kell (1868), 4 Bing. N. C. 638 ; 6 Scott, 379 ; 1 Arn. 246 223 

Bailliet). Ld. Inchlquin (1796), 1 Esp. 435 712 

Baillie's case (1778), 21 How. St. Tr. 358 603, 612 

Bain v. Case (1 829), 3 C. & P. 496 ; M. & M. 262 1048 

Bain ;>. Fothergill.(1874), L. R. 6 Ex. 59 ; L. R. 7 H. L. 158 ; 40 L. J. 

Ex. 34 ; 43 L. J. Ex. 243 ; 23 L. T. 670 ; 31 L. T. 387 ; 19 W. R. 134. . 773 

Bain v. Mason (1824), 1 C. & P. 202, 203, n 1172, 1173 

Bain j). Whitehaven andEumess Junc.Rail. Co. (1850), 3 H. L. Cas.l9. .51,1176, 

1231 
Bainbridge v. Wade (1850), 16 Q. B. 89 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 7 ; 15 Jur. 572. . 786 

Bainbrigge ». Baddeley (1847), 2 Phillips, 705 . . .' 1117 

Bainbrigge v. Browne (1881), L. R. 18 Ch. D. 188 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 622 ; 44 

L. T. 706 ; 29 W. R. 782 136 

Baines v. Swainson (1863), 4 B. & S. 270 ; 32 L. J. Q. B. 281 ; 8 L. T. 536 ; 

11 W. R. 945 116 

Bairdi!. Cochran (1818), 4 Serg. &R. 397 969 

Baker, Re, ColUns v. Rhodes (1882), 20 Ch. D. 230 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 316 ; 45 

L. T. 658 ; 30 W. R. 858 76 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. xxix 

Baker v. Baker (1863), 32 L. J. Pr. & Mat. 145 ; 3 Swab. & Trist. 213 : 11 

W. R. 602 947 949 

Baker v. Bradley (1856), 25 L. J. Ch. 7 : 4 De a. M. & d. 597 '. ' 136 

Baker J). Cave (1857), 1 H. & N. 674 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 190 1076 

Baker v. Dening (1838), 8 A. & E. 94 ; 3 N. & P. 228 700 

Baker v. Dewey (1823), 1 B. & C. 704 ; 3 Dowl. & R. 99 ' 92 

Baker v. Keen (1819), 2 Starkie, N. P. 501 168 

Baker «>. Lend, and S. W. Ry. Co. (1867), 37 L. J. Q. B. "ss ;' l! R.'s 

Q. B. 91; 8B. &S. 645; 16L. T. 126 1186 

Baker v. Monk (1864), 33 Beav. 419 ; 4 De G. J. & S. 388 ; 10 jur. isf S. 

624, 691 ; 10 L. T. N. S. 86, 630 ; 12 W. R. 521, 779 136 

Baker v. Ray (1826), 2 Rusb. 73 108 

Baker v. Sampson (1863), 14 C. B. N. S. 383 166 

Bakewell' 8 Patent, Re (1862), 15 Moo. P. C. 385 129 

Baloettif. Serani (1792), Peake, N. P. 142 231 

Baldeyj). Parker (1823), 2 B. & C. 37 ; 3 Dowl. & R. 220 '.'.".". .689, 690 

Baldney v. Ritchie (1824), 1 Starkie, N. P. 338 311 

BalkisCo. Re (1888), 58 L. T. 300; 36 "W. R. 392 ... 134 

Ball, Re (1890), 25 Ir. L. R. 556 79O 

BaUard v. Way (1836), 1 M. & "W. 529 : 2 Gale, 61 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 207 . . ' 1092 
BaUs and Met. Bd. Works, Re (1866), 7 B. & S. 177 ; L. R. 1 Q. B. 337 ; 

35 L. J. Q. B. 101 ; 13 L. T. 702 ; 14 W. R. 370 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 183 . . 728 

Balme ». Button (undated), 2.Lew. C. C. 152 (cited) ; 3 Moo. & So. 1 926 

Ealtazzi v. Ryder (1808), 12 Moo. P. C. C. 168 ; 31 L. T. 0. S. 373 .... 102 

Bamfield v. Maesey (1808), 1 Camp. 460 256 

Bamfield ». Tapper (1851), 7 Ex. 27 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 6 .'.'.".'."."" 716 

Bamford, Ex parte (1809), 15 Ves. 449 379 

Banbury Peer. (1809), Le Marohant's Gardner's Peerage; Selwyn'a Nisi 

Prius, 748—750 101, 416, 422, 423, 424 

Banbury's Trusts, Re (1876), I. R. 10 Eq. 408 144 

Bancroft ». Bancroft and Runmey (I860), 34 L. J. Pr. & Mat. 14 • 13 

W. R. 506 1110 

Bandy v. Cartwright (1819), 8 Ex. 913 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 285 773, 774 

Bank Prosecutions (1819), R. & R. 378 278 

Bank of Augusta v. Earle (1839), 13 Pet. 519, 589 16, 181 

Bank of Columbia v. Patterson (1813), 7 Cranch, 299 640 

Bank of Monroe v. Field (1842), 2 Hill R. 445 ,'..'. 388 

Bankof New South Wales v. Owstou (1879), L. R. 4 App. Cas. 270 ; 14 

Cox C. C. 267 ; 48 L. J. Pr. C. 25 ; 40 L. T. 500 643 

Banks ». Crossland (1874), 44 L. J. M. C. 8 ; L. R. 10 Q. B. 97 ; 32 L. T 

226 ; 23 W. R. 414 681 

Banly, R* (1849), 1 Roberts. 710 698 

Bannatyne v. Bannatyne (1852), 2 Roberta. 476 ; 16 Jur. 864 1102 

Banner v. Jackson (1847), 1 De G. & Sra. 472 609 

Bar V. Gratz (1819), 4 Wheat. 213 429, 433 

Barbat v. Allen (1852), 7 Ex. 609 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 166 879, 887, 891, 910 

Barber, Re (1866), 36 L. J. P. D. & Mat. 19 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 267 ; 15 

L. T. 192 ; 15 W. R. 231 307 

Barber u. Holmes (1800), 3 Esp. 190 1049, 1172, 1173 

Barber v. Houston (1885), 18 L. R. Ir. 475 71 

Barber v. Lamb (1860), 29 L. J. C. P. 234 ; 8 C. B. N. S. 95 ; 8 W. R. 

461 ; 6. Jur. N. S. 981 II53 

Barber v. Wood (1877), 4 Ch. D. 886 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 728 ; 36 L. T. N. S. 

373 801 

Barber v. Wood (1838), 2 M. & Rob. 172 814, 815, 816 

Barclay v. Bailey (1810), 2 Camp. 527 ; 11 R. R. 787 33 

Barclay v. Maskelyne (1859), 28 L. J. Ch. 115 ; 1 Johns. 124 ; 4 Jur. 

N. S. 1293 704 

Barclay D. Parrott (1856), 1 C. B. N. S. 49 ; 26 L. J. C. P. 77 ; 3Jur.N.S. 

672 726 

Bardeu v. Keverberg (1837), 2 M. & W. 61 ; 2 Gale, 201 231 

Bargaddie Coal Co. v. Wark (1859), 3 Macq. H. of L. Cas. (Sc.) 468 ; 1 
Paterson, 814 592, 751 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



XXX TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOH 

Barings. Clagett (1802), 3 B. & P. 215; 6E.R. 759 1146,1149 

Baring v. Clark (1837), 12 Pick. 220 388 

Barker v. Buttress (1845), 7 Beav. 134 ; 13 L. J. Ch. 684 8 Jur. 89 74 

Barker v. Davis (1864), 34 L. J. M. 0. 140 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 651 638 

Barker v. Dixie (1736), Cases temp. Hardw. 264 891 

Barker v. Ray (1826), 2 Russ. 76 435 

Barker v. Richardson (1827), 1 T. & J. 362 487 

Barker v. Stead (1847), 3 C. B. 946 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 160 1219 

Barker's Estate, Re (1878), 10 Ch. D. 162 ; 48 L. J. Ch. 171 ; 27 W. R. 

393 534 

Barkworth v. Young (1857), 26 L. J. Ch. 153 ; 4 Drew. 1 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 34 680 

Barnard, Re (1862), 31 L. J. Pr. & Mat. 89 ; 2 Swab. & Trist. 489 1031 

Barned's Banking Co., Re (Peel's Case) (1867), 36 L. J. Ch. 757 ; L. R. 

2 Ch. 674 ; 15 W. R. 1100 ; 16 L. T. N. S. 780 1076 

Barnes, Ex parte (1842), 2 Dowl. N. S. 20 ; 7 Jur. 217 994 

Barnes v. Kettle (1766), 2 WUs. 314 932 

Barnes v. Lucas (1825), Ry. & M. 264 1213 

Barnes 1;. Mawson (1813), 1 M. & Sel. 81 397, 403 

Barnes v. Pendrey (1839), 7 Dowl. 747 733 

Barnes v. Toye (1884), 13 Q. B. D. 410 ; 53 L. J. Q. B. 567 ; 61 L. T. 292 ; 

33 W. R. 15; 48 J. P. 664 48 

Barnes v. Trompowsky (1797), 7 T. R. 266 1213 

Barnes v. Vincent (1846), 5 Moo. P. C. C. 201 1045, 1132 

Bamett v. Brandao (1843), 6 M. & Gr. 630 5 

Bamett v. Cox (1847), 9 Q. B. 617 ; 4 New Sess. Cas. 487 ; 16 L. J. M. C. 

27 ; 11 Jur. 118 228 

Bamett v. Glossop (1835), 1 Bing. N. C. 636 ; 3 Dowl. 625 220 

Barnett v. Lucas (1872), I. R. 6 C. L. 247 1120 

Bamett «. TugweU (1862), 31 Beav. 232 ; 31 L. J. Ch. 629 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 

787 ; 10 W. R. 679 ; 7 L. T. N. S. 121 174 

Barnstable f. Lathey (1789), 3 T. R. 303 995 

Barnstaple Second Annuity Society (1884), 50 L. T. 424 748 

Barough v. White (1825), 4 B. & C. 328 487, 512 

Birr V. Gratz (1819), 4 Wheat. 213 429, 433, 1098 

Barraolough v. Greenhough (1867), 36 L. J. Q. B. 26, 251 ; 7 B. & S. 170 ; 

8 B. & S. 623 ; L. R. 2 Q. B. 1 1163 

Barraclough v. Johnson (1838), 8 A. & E. 99 ; 3 N. & P. 233 ; 1 W. W. & 

H. 162 ; 2 Jur. 839 402 

Barrell, Re {see Bailey, Ex parte). 

Barren 1). TrusseU (1811), 4 Taunt. 121 653 

Barrett v. Buxton (1826), 2 Aik. (Vermont) 167 747 

Barrett v. Hyndman (1840), 3 Ir. L. R. 109 676 

Barrett v. Long (1866), 8 Ir. L. R. 331 ; 3 H. L. Cas. 395 46, 243 

Barrett v. Rolfe (1845), 14 M. & W. 348 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 308 666 

Barrett v. WUsou (1834), 1 C. M. & R. 586 ; 3 Dowl. P. C. 220 ; 5 Tyr. 

218 1160 

Barron v. Daniel (1838), Crawf. & Dix. Abrid. C. 283 1015 

Barronet's Case (1853), 1 El. & Bl. 1 ; Dears. (Pearce's Report) 51 ; 22 L. 

J. M. C. 25 ; 17 Jur. 184 79 

Barrow v. Dyster (1884), 13 Q. B. D. 635 ; 51 L. T. 573 ; 33 W. R. 199. . 769 

Barrow v. Humphreys (1820), 3 B. & A. 598 831, 832 

Barrs v. Pewkes (1866), 34 L. J. Ch. 622 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 669 ; 13 W. R. 

987 ; 12 L. T. N. S. 727 808 

Barrs». Jackson (1845), 1 Phillips, 682; 14L.J.Ch.433; 9Jur. 609. .1106, 1106, 1132 

Barry v. Bebbington (1792), 4 T. R. 514 ; 2 R. R. 450 279, 437 

Barry v. ButUn (1838), 1 'Curt. 638 ; 2 Moo. P. C. R. 482 142 

Barrymore, Ld., v. Taylor (1796), 1 Esp. 326 484 

Barstow's case (1831), 1 Lewin C. C. 110 662 

Barthelemy v. The People, &c. (1842), 2 Hill, N. Y. Rep. 248 378 

Bartholomew v. Stephens (1839), 8 C. & P. 728 308, 309, 319 

Bartlett v. Delprat (1808), 4 Mass. 702 371, 614 

Bartlett v. Downes (1826), 3 B. & C. 616 ; 5 Dowl. & R. 526 ; 1 C. & P. 

622 126 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OP CASES CITED. XXXI 

PAOK 

Bartlettu. Gfflard (1826), 3 Eusa. 156; 6 L. J. Oh. 19 483, 806 

Bartlett v. Pentland (1830), 10 B. & 0. 760 158 

Bartlett v. Pickeregill (1769-60), 4 East, 677, n. ; 1 Cox, 6; 1 E. R. 1 . . 667 
Bartlett v. Smith. (1843), 11 M. & W. 486 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 287 ; 7 Jur. 448. .25, 26 
Bartlett v. WeUB (1861), 31 L. J. Q. B. 57 ; 1 B. & S. 836 ; 6 L. T. 607 ; 

10 W. R. 229 541 

Barton v. Bank of New South Wales (1890), 15 App. Cas. 379 85, 748 

Bartons. Dawes (1850), 10 C. B. 261; 19 L. J. C. P. 302 758, 804 

Barton (should be Barlow) v. Dupuy (1823), 1 Mart. N. S. 442 1034 

Barton (should be Barstow) v. Palmes (1704), Preo. in Ch. 233 327 

Barton v. Robins (1769), 3 Phillim. 445, n. (*.) 140 

BarweU?;. Adkins(1840), IM. &Gr. 807; 2Soott, N. R. 11 243 

Barwick v. EngUsh Joint Stock Bank (1867), L. R. 2 Ex. 259 ; 36 L. J. 

Ex. 147 ; 16 L. T. 461 ; 15 W. R. 877 586 

Baseley v. Forder {see Bazeley v. Eorder) . 

Bass V. CUve (1815), 4 M. & Sol. 13 ; 4 Camp. 78 547 

Bastard v. Smith (1839), 10 A. & E. 213 ; 2 P. & D. 453 476, 966, 1014 

Bastard v. Trutoh (1835), 3 A. & E. 451 ; 6 N. & M. 109 ; 4 Dowl. 6 ; 1 H. 

& W. 321 130 

Easten v. Carew (1825), 3 B. & C. 652 ; 6 D. & R. 558 1098, 1100 

Bastin v. Oarew (1824), Ry. & M. 127 917 

Batohelor v. Honeywood (1799), 2 Esp. 714 1222 

Bate V. HiU (1823), 1 0. & P. 100 257 

TSatev. Kinsey (1835), 1 0. M. & R. 41 ; 4 Tyi-. 662 109, 319, 603 

Bateman*. Bailey (1794), 5 T. R. 512 377, 380, 381, 514 

Bateman v. PhilUps (1812), 15 East, 272 ; 4 Taun. 157 670, 759 

Bateman v. Binder (1842), 3 Q. B. 574 ; 2 G. & D. 790 ; 11 L. J. Q. B. 

281 714 

Bateman !). Ld. Roden (1844), 1 Jones & Lat. 366 739 

Bates V. Barber (1849), 4 Gush. (Mass.), 107 974 

Bates w. Don Pablo Sora (1856), 10 Moo. P. 0. R. 467 178 

Bates «). Townley (1848), 2 Ex. 166; 19 L. J. Ex. 399 517, 1161 

Bateson v. Hartsink (1801), 4 Esp. 43 598 

Bath, Ld. v. Bathersea (1696), 6 Mod. 10 480 

Bathurst v. Eriington (1877), L. R. 2 App. Cas. 698 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 748 ; 

37 L. T. 338 ; 25 W. R. 908 741 

Batley «. Kynook (1875), L.R. 20 Eq. 632; 44 L. J. Ch. 665 ; 33L. T. 45.. ,818 

Batten, Re (1849), 7 Notes of Cases (Ecel. & M.) 288 698 

Batthews v. Galindo (1828), 4 Bing. 613 ; 1 M. & P. 665 ; 3 C. & P. 

238 639, 890 

Batthyany v. Bouoh (1881), 50 L. J. Q. B. 421 ; 44 L. T. 177 ; 29 W. R. 

665 651 

Batturs v. Sellers (1820), 5 Har. & J. 117 528 

Baugh V. Cradocke (1832), 1 M. & Rob. 182 602 

Baumann v. James (1868), L. R. 3 Ch. 608 ; 18 L. T. 424 ; 16 W. R. 877. 672 
Baxendalev. Bennett (1878), 3 Q B. D. 626 ; 47 L. J. C. P. 624 ; 26 W. 

R. 899 547 

Baxendale v. De Valmer (1887), 67 E. T. 556 697 

Baxter v. Brown (1846), 7 M. & Gr. 215 ; 8 Scott, N. R. 1019 . . . .666, 683, 684 
Baxter v. Nurse (1844), 6 M. & Gr. 935 ; 7 Scott, N. R. 801 ; 1 C. & K. 

10 ; 13 L. J. 0. P. 82 ; 8 Jur. 273 153 

Bayard v. Malcolm (1806), 1 Johns. 467 743 

Bayley». Ashton (1840), 12 A. &E. 493; 4 P. &D. 204 717 

Bayley v. Bradley (1848), 5 Com. B. 396 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 206 93, 98 

Bayleyj). Buokland (1847), 1 Ex. 1 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 204 1111 

Bayley v. M. of Conyngham (1863), 16 Ir. C. L. Rep. 406 654 

Bayley v. Overseers of Nantwich (1846), 2 C. B. 118 ; 1 Lutw. Reg. C. 

363 156 

Bayley v. Wilkins (1849), 7 C. B. 886 ; 18 L. J. C. P. 273 ; 13 Jur. 883 . . 168 

Bayley J>. Wylie (1807), 6 Esp. 86 1037, 1040 

BayUflfe v. Butterworth (1847), 1 Ex. 429 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 18 ; 11 Jur. 1019 ; 

5 Railw. Cas. 283 167, 168 

Baylis v. Lawrence (1840), 11 A. & E. 926 ; 3 P. & D. 526 ; 4 Jur. 652 . . 46, 46, 82 

V»l. L ends with page 636. 



XXXll TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAQB 

Baynton's case (1702), U How. St. Tr. 630 369 

Bazeley v. Forder (1868), L. R. 3 Q. B. 562 ; 9 B. & S. 602 ; 37 L. J. Q. 

B. 240; 18L. T. 756 166, 168 

Beadle, Re (1849), 1 Roberts. 749 ; 7 Notes of Cases (Eool. & M.) 43 .... 698 

Beadon v. King (1849), 17 Sim. 34 601 

Beal «. S. Dev. Ry. Co. (1864), 5 H. & N. 875 ; 29 L. J. Ex. 441 723 

Beale v. Sanders (1837), 3 Bing. N. C. 850 ; 5 Scott, 58 654 

Beall r. Beck (1794), 3 Hard. & MoHen. 242 508 

Bealy d. Greenslade (1831), 2 C. & J. 61 716 

Beamish v. Beamish (1876), I. R. 10 Bq. 413 1071 

Beamou v. EUioe (1831), 4 C. & P. 585 918 

Bean v. Quimby (1829), 5 New Hamps. 91 600 

Beardman v. Wilson (1868), L. R. 4 C. P. 57 ; sub nom. Beardmore v. 

Wilson, 38 L. J. C. P. 91 ; 19 L. T. 282 ; 17 W. R. 54 656 

Beardslee v. Richardson (1833), 11 Wend. 25 378 

Beasley v. Magrath (1804), 2 Sqh. & Lef . 34 496 

Beasney's Trusts, Re (1869), 38 L. J. Ch. 159 ; L. R. 7 Eq. 498 173 

Beatson v. Skene (1860), 29 L. J. Ex. 430 ; 5 H. & N. 838 618, 619 

Beattie ». Ld. Ebmy (1872) L. R. 7 Ch. App. 777, 800—803 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 

804 780, 781 

Beauohamp v. Cash (1822), Dowl. & Ry. N. P. 3 1223 

Beauohamp j;. Parry (1830), 1 B. & Ad. 89 811, 512 

Beaufort, D. of v. Ashburnham (1863), 32 L. J. C. P. 97 ; 13 C. B. N. S. 

.598 818 

Beaufort, D. of v. Crawshay (1866), L. R. 1 C. P. 699 ; 35 L. J. C. P. 

342 ; 1 H. & R. 638 25, 349 

Beaufort, I), of v. Neald (1844), 12 CI. & Fin. 249 638 

Beaufort, D. of v. Smith (1849^ 4 Ex. 450 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 97 .... 124, 396, 397, 

403, 404, 1040, 1092 

Beaufort, D. of v. May. of Swansea (1849), 3 Ex. 413 124, 791, 792 

Beaumont v. Brengerl (1847), 6 C. B. 301 690 

Beaumont v. Fell (1723), 2 P. Wms. 141 795 

Beaumont v. Field (1818), 2 Chitty R. 275 789 

Beaumont v. Mountain (1834), 10 Bing. 404 1006 

Beaumont v. Perkins (1809), 1 PhiUim. 78 1223 

Beaurain v. Sir W. Scott (not dated). Lord Eldon's Life by Twiss, Vol. II. 

pp. 233—235 616 

Beavan v. M'Donnell (1854), 23 L. J. Ex. 326 ; 10 Ex.' 184 243 

Beck and Jackson, Re (1857), 1 C. B. N. S. 695 1039 

Beckett v. Howe (1869), 39 L. J. P. & M. 1 ; L. R. 2 P. & D. 1 697 

Beckett v. Corp. of Leeds. (1871), L. R. 7 Ch. App. 421 ; 26 L. T. 375 ; 

20 W. R. 464 112 

Beckford v. Beckford (1774), Lofit, 490 666 

Beckham v. Drake (1847-9), 2 H. L. C. 579 664 

Beckham v. Osborne (1843), 6 M. & Gr. 771 486 

Beckton v. Barton (1859), 27 Beav. 99 ; 28 L. J. Ch. 673 806 

Beckwithj!. Benner (1834),6 C. &P. 681 610 

Beckwith v. Sydebotham (1807), 1 Camp. 117 ; 10 R. R. 652 934, 935 

Beoquetj;. MacCarthy (1831), 2 B. & Ad. 961 1146, 1147, 1154 

Bedford, E. of v. Exeter, Bp. of (1616-17), Hob. 137 1115 

Bedford, D. of v. Lopes (1838), cited Doe v. Pulman, 3 Q. B. 623 301, 433 

Bedfordshire case (1785), 2 Luders, 411 497 

Beech v. Jones (1848), 6 C. B. 696 924, 927 

Beeoheri.-. Major (1866), 2 Dr. & Sm. 431 667 

Eeechiug v. Gower (1816), Holt, N. P. Rep. 314 ; 17 R. R. 644 909 

'Beema.nv. Duck (1843), 11 M. & W. 261 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 198 547, 548 

Beer v. Walker (1877), 46 L. J. C. P. 677 ; 25 W. R. 880 776 

Beer v. Ward (1821), cited 2 Ph. Ev. 268 1227 

Bees V. Williams (1836), 2 C. M. & R. 581 ; 1 T. & G. 23 660 

Beeston v. Collyer (1827), 4 Bing. 313 ; 12 Moore, 552 ; 2 C. & P. 607 153 

Belbin v. Skeats (1857), 27 L. J. P. & M. 66 ; 1 Sw. & Tr. 148 278, 1216 

Belcher v. M'Intosh (1839), 8 C. & P. 721 .258, 269 

T/ie references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED XXXIU 

PAOE 

Beldon v. Campbell (1861), 6 Ex. 886 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 324 179 

Belfast Dock Act, Ee (1866-7), Ir. Rep. 1 Eq. 128, 142 234 

Belfort, The (1884), 9 P. D. 215 ; 53 L. J. P. 88 ; 61 L. T. 271 ; 33 W. R. 

171 ; 5 Asp. M. 0. 291 282 

Bell V. Ansley (1812), 16 East, 143 ; 14 B,. R. 322 496 

Bell V. Bruen (1843), 17 Peters, 161 765 

Bell V. Chaytor (1843), 1 C. & Kir. 162 1211 

Bell V. FothergiU (1870), L. R. 2 P. & D. 148 ; 23 L. T. 323 ; 18 W. R. 

1040 143 

Bell V. Erankis (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 446 ; 11 L. J. 0. P. 300 ; 5 Scott, N. R. 

460 620, 621 

BeU V. Howard (1741), 9 Mod. 305 762 

Bell V. Kennedy (1868), L. E. 1 H. L. (So. & D.) 307 179 

Bell V. Love (1884), 10 Q. B. D. 547 ; 52 L. J. Q. B. 290 ; 48 L. T. 592 ; 

47 J. P. 468 115 

Bell V. Morrison (1828), 1 Peters, 371 386 

Bell V. Parke (1860), 11 Ir. C. L. Rep. 413 266, 256 

Bell V. Simpson (1857), 26 L. J. Ex. 363 ; 2 H. & N. 410 83 

Bell V. Stewart (1842), Arm. M. & 0. 401 977 

Bell V. Warden (1740), Willes, 202 , 39 

BeU V. "Wilson (1866), 2 Dr. & Sm. 395 ; 35 L. J. Ch. 337 50 

Bell's case (1800), cited in Joy on Conf. 71 ; and in 1 McNally, Ev. 43 . . 566 
Bellamy v. Debenham (1891), 48 Ch. D. 481 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 166; 64 L. T. 

478 ; 39 "W. R. 257 672 

Bellamy v. Jones (1802), 8 Ves. 31 ; 6 R. R. 205 342 

Bellerophon, H.M.S. (1874), 44 L. J. Adm. 5 ; 31 L. T. 766 ; 23 W. R. 

248 618 

Bellinger v. The People (1832), 8 "Wend. 696 962 

BeUinger's case (1832), 8 "Wend. 896, 599 674 

Belt V. Lawes (1883), " Times," 1883 932 

Bempdfe v. Johnstone (1796), 3 Ves. 198 179 

Bend v. Greorgia Ins. Co. (1842), Sup. Ct. N. T., 1842, cited in Gr. Ev. 

s. 292 766 

Benesh v. Booth (1864), 18 C. B. N. S. Ill ; 34 L. J. C. P. 99 ; 11 L. T. 

479 ; 13 W. R. 271 726 

Bengal, The (1869), Svrab. Adm. 468 1120 

.Benham's Trusts, Re (1868), 37 L. J. Ch. 265 ; 16 W. E. 180 ; reversing 

36 L. J. Ch. 602 ; L. R. 4 Eq. 416 173 

Benham v. Newell (1855), 24 L. J. Ch. 424 ; S. C, sub nom. Palmer v. 

NewaU, 20 Beav. 32 807 

Benmore, The (1873), L. R. 4 Adm. & Ecc. 132 ; 43 L. J. Adm. 8 260 

Bennet v. Bennet (1879), 10 Ch. D. 474 ; 40 L. T. 378 ; 27 "W. R. 673. . . . 666 

Bennet v. Hartford (1650), Sty. 333 899 

Bennet v. "Watson (1814), 3 M. & Sel. 1 ; 16 R. R. 373 811 

Bennett v. Blain (1863), 15 C. B. N. S. 518 ; 1 H. & P. 35 ; 33 L. J. C. P. 

63; 10 Jur. N. S. 130; 9 L. T. 506; 12 "W. R. 176 684 

Bennett ». Brumfitt (1867), L. R. 3 C. P. 28 ; 37 L. J. C. P. 36 ; 17 L. T. 

213 ; 16 "W. R. 131 ; 1 H. & P. 407 700 

Bennett v. Gamgee (1877), 46 L. J. Ex. 33, 204 ; 35 L. T. 764 ; 36 L. T. 

48 ; 26 "W. R. 81, 293 92 

Bennett & Glave, Re (1877), 46 L. J. Bank. 81 ; L. R. 6 Ch. D. 145 ; 25 

"W. R. 604 847 

Bennett v. Griffiths (1861), 30 L. J. Q. B. 98 ; 3 L. T. 735 ; 9 "W. R. 332 ; 

7 Jur. N. S. 284 364 

Bennett v. Houldsworth (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 646; L. E. 6 Ch. D. 671 ; 

36 L. T. 648 806 

Bennett v. Hyde (1825), 6 Conn. 24 266 

Bennett v. Marshall (1866), 2 K. & J. 740 793 

Bennett v. Sharpe (1892), cited Greenleaf on Evid., 16th ed. 369 698 

Bennett v. The State of Tennessee (1826), Mart. & Y. 133 18 

Bennion v. Davison (1838), 3 M. & "W. 179 ; 1 H. & H. 46 ; 7 L. J. Ex. 

116 533 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



XXXIV TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAOE 

Benson v. Benson (1870), L. R. 2 P. & D. 172; 40 L. J. P. & D. 1 ; 23 

L. T. 709 ; 19 W. R. 190 705 

Benson v. Chapman (1848), 2 H. L. Cas. 696, 722 ; 8 C. B. 950 ; 13 Jur. 

969 207 

Benson ». Marshal (undated), cited Shaw v. Broom, 4 Dowl. & Ry. 731 . . 511 

Benson v. OHve (1781, should be 1732), 2 Str. 919 171, 328 

Benson v. Post (1748), 1 Wils. 240 996 

Bentall v. Burn (1824), 5 D. & R. 284 ; 3 B. & C. 423 ; R. & M. 107 691 

Bentall v. Sidney (1839), 10 A. & E. 164 1014 

Bentham v. Wilson {see Re Parker). 

Beutley v. Cooke (1784), 3 Dour. 424 892 

Benlley, Dr., case of (1735-6), Fortesc. 202; 1 Str. 557: Andr. 176; 2Ld. 

Raym. 1334 1148 

Bentley v. Maokay (1862), 31 Beav. 165 ; 31 L. J. Ch. 697 539, 749 

Benton v. Sutton (1797), 1 Bos. & P. 24 37 

Benyon v. CressweU (1848), 12 Q. B. 899 ; 18 L. J. Q. B. 1 : 12 Jur. 1036 652 

Beuyou V. Nettlefold (1850), 3 Mao. & G. 94 ; 20 L. J. Ch. 186 91 

Berdan v. Greenwood (1878), 20 Ch. D. 767, n. ; 46 L. T. 524, u 536 

Bere v. Ward (1821), 2 Ph. Et. 246 87 

Bergheim v. Gt. East. Ry. Co. (1878), 3 C. P. D. 221 ; 47 L. J. C. P. 318 ; 

38 L. T. 160 ; 26 W. R. 301 161 

Berkeley, Peerage (1811), 4 Camp. 415; 14 R. R. 782, vi. ..367, 393, 408, 416, 

418, 419, 422, 435, 976 
Berkeley, Peerage (1858-61), 8 H. L. 0. 21 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 21 ; 4 L. T. 686. .309, 

411, 412, 423 

Berkeley v. Hardy (1826), 5 B. & C. 355 ; 8 D. & R. 102 645 

B-rmon «. Woodhridge (1781), 2 Doug. 788 479, 480 

Bernard! v. Motteux (1781), 2 Doug. 575 1149 

Bemasoom v. Atkinson (1853), 10 Hare, 345 ; 23 L. J. Ch. 184 ; 1 W. R. 

152; 17 Jur. 128 798, 799 

Bemasconi v. Farehrother (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 372 498 

Berne, City of v. Bk. of England (1804), 9 Ves. 347 ; 7 R. R. 218 3 

Bemett v. Taylor (1804), 9 Ves. 381 1213 

Bemey «. Bp. of Norwich (1866), 36 L. J Ecc. 10 632, 884 

Bemey v. Read (1845), 7 Q. B. 79 : 14 L. J. Q. B. 247 1038 

Berrey v. Lindley (1841), 3 M. & G. 512 ; 4 Scott, N. R. 61 ; 5 Jur. 1061 ; 

11 L. J. C. P. 27 654, 655 

Berridge v. Ward (1861), 30 L. J. C. P. 218 ; 10 C. B. N. S. 400; 7 Jur. 

N. S. 876 ; 2 F. & F. 208 112 

Berry, Ex parte (1872, should be 1812), 19 Ves. 218 824 

Berry v. Alderman (1853), 14 C. B. 95 ; 2 C. L. R. 691 ; 23 L. J. C. P. 34 262 

Berry v. Banner (1792), Peake, 157 ; 3 R. R. 674 397, 1109 

Berry v. Pratt (1823), 1 B. & C. 276 ; 2 Dowl. & R. 424 818 

Berryman v. Wise (1792), 4 T. R. 366 ; 2 R. R. 413 148, 150, 519 

Berthon v. Loughman (1817), 2 Stark. 258 934 

Bertie v. Beaumont (1816), 2 Price, 308 87, 431 

Berwick v. HorsfaU (1858), 27 L. J. C. P. 193 ; 4 C. B. N. S. 450 ; 4 Jur. 

N. S. 615 44, 45 

Berwick-upon-Tweed, May. & Corp. of v. Murray (1850), 19 L. J. Ch. 

281, 286 945 

Berwick, May. of, v. Oswald (1853), 1 E. & B. 295 ; 22 L. J. Q. B. 129 ; 

17 Jur. 1148 750 

Berwick's case (1746), Fost. C. L. 10 ; 18 How. St. Tr. 370 558 

Besant v. Cross (1851), 10 C. B. 895 ; 2 L. M. & P. 351 ; 20 L. J. C. P. 

173; 15 Jur. 828 766 

Besley, Ex parte (1850), 2 Mac. & G. 176 ; 2 H. & Tw. 376 ; 19 L. J. Ch. 

382 ; 14 Jur. 704 541 

Bessela v. Stem (1877), 2 C. P. D. 265 ; 46 L. J. C. P. 467 ; 37 L. T. 88 ; 

25 W. R. 561 631, 881 

Bessey v. Windham (1844), 6 Q. B. 172 ; 14 L. J. Q. B. 7 ; 8 Jur. 824. .481, 1133 
Betham v. Benson (1818), Gow, R. 45 388 

I%e references are to pages, not to paragrapht. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. XXXV 

PAaB 
Bethell «i. Blencowe (1841), 3 M. & Gr. 119 ; 3 Scott, N. E. 568 ; 10 L. J. 

C.P. 243 288, 291 

Betteley v. MuLeod (1837), 3 Bing.' N. C. 405 ; 6 L. J. C. P. Ill ; 4 Sc. 

121 ; 6 Dowl. 481 819 

Betteley v. Eeid (1843), 4 Q. B. 511 ; 3 a. & D. 561 ; 12 L. J. Q. B. 172 ; 

7 Jnr. 507 545 

Betts V. Bagley (1832), 12 Pick. 572, 682 1098 

Beits V. De Vitre (1868), L. E. 3 Ch. 429 ; 37 L. J. Oh. 325 ; 18 L. T. 165 ; 

16 W. E. 529 107 

Betts V. Menzies (1859), 1 E. & E. 990, 1020 ; 28 L. J. Q. B. 361 ; 5 Jur. 

N. S. 1164 ; 10 H. L. Gas. 117 ; 31 L. J. Q. B. 233 ; 7 L. T. 110 ; 11 

W. E. 1 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 29 43, 599 

Betty V. NaU (1856), 6 Ir. 0. L. E. 17 417 

Bevan v. Bevan (1860), 29 L. J. P. & M. 45 1138 

Bevan v. Gething (1842), 3 Q. B. 740 ; 3 G. & D. 59 ; 12 L. J. Q. B. 37 ; 

6 Jur. 971 717 

Bevan v. Hill (1810), 2 Camp. 381 ; 11 E. E. 741 307 

Bevan v. MoMahon (1859), 2 S. & T. 65 ; 28 L. J. P. & M. 40 977 

Bevan v. Waters (1828), M. & M. 236 ; 3 C. & P. 520 609 

Bevan v. Williams (1776-1776), 3 T. E. 636, n. (a) 160, 518 

Beveridge v. Minter (1824), 1 C. & P. 364 591 

Beverley v. Beverley (1690), 2 Vera. 131 171 

Beverley, May. of v. Craven (1838), 2 M. & Eob. 140 1040 

Beverley v. Lincoln Gas Light and Coke Co. (1837), 2 N. & P. 283 ; 6 A. 

& B. 829 640, 641, 644 

Beverley's case (1603-4), 4 Co. Eep. 123, 124 609 

Bewley v. Atkinson (1880), 13 Ch. D. 283 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 6 ; 41 L. T. 603; 

28 W. E. 638 76, 437 

Bewley v. Power (1833), Hayes & J. 368 711, 713 

Beynou v. Cook (1875), L. E. 10 Ch. 389 ; 23 W. E. 531 ; 32 L. T. 353. . 137, 138 

Beynon ». Garrat (1824), 1 0. & P. 154 649 

Bheart). Harradine (1852), 7 Ex. 269 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 127 1160 

Bibb V. Thomas (1776-7), 2 W. Bl. 1043 705, 706 

Biccard v. Shepherd (1861), 14 Moore, P. C. C. 471 ; 5 L. T. N. S. 604 ; 

10 W. E. 136 770, 771 

Biekett v. Morris (1866), L. E. 1 H. L. 47 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 803 ; 14 L. T. 

835 111 523 

Bidder v. Bridges (1884)', '37 'Ch.' I).' 406;' 57 L. J. Ch. s'o'o';' '68 l'.'t! '6'6'6 . . '342, 

343, 349, 430, 914, 1168 
Biddle v. Bond (1865), 6 B. & S. 225 ; 34 L. J. Q. B. 137 ; 12 L. T. 178 ; 

13 W. E. 661 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 425 545 

Biel, De v. Thomson (1844), 3 Beav. 476, 476 680 

Biffin V. Bignell (1862), 7 H. & N. 877 ; 31 L. J. Ex. 189 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 

647 ; 6 L. T. 248 ; 10 W. E. 322 167 

Bigg V. Strong (1857), 3 Sm. & G. 592 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 108, 983 ; 6 W. E. 

173, 636 523 

Bigg V. Whisking (1863), 14 C. B. 196 689 

Bigge V. Parkinson (1862), 7 H. & N. 955 ; 31 L. J. Ex. 301 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 

1014 ; 7 L. T. 92 ; 10 W. E. 349 776, 777 

Biggs V. Lawrence (1789), 3 T. E. 454 ; 1 E. E. 740 747 

Bignell v. Clarke (1860), 6 H. & N. 485 ; 29 L. J. Ex. 257 ; 2 L. T. 189. . 201 
Bigsby ». Dickinson (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 280 ; 4 Ch. D. 24 ; 35 L. T. 679; 

25 W. E. 89 1233, 1234 

Bilbie v. Lmnley (1802), 2 East, 469, 472 : 6 E. E. 479 79 

Bm*. Bament (1841), 9 M. & W. 36; 10 L. J. Ex. 302 674, 690 

BUlage V. Southee (1852), 9 Hare, 534 ; 21 L. J. Ch. 472 137 

Billing V. Welch (1871), Ir. E. 6 C. L. 88 86 

Billingshurst ». Vickers (1810), 1 Phillim. 191 140 

BiUs V. Smith (1863), 6 B. & S. 214 ; G4 L. J. Q. B. 68 ; 12 L. T. 22 ; 13 

W E. 407 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 164 83 

Bingham v. Stanley (1841), 2 Q. B. 117 ; 1 G. & D. 237 ; 6 Jur. 389 ; 9 C. 

& P 374 262, 633 

Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



XXXVl TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOB 

Biroh, Re (1853), 17 Beav. 358 129 

Birch 0. Birch (1848), 6 Notes of Gas. (Ecc. & Mar.) 142 

Birch V. Depeyster (1816), 1 Stark. 210 ; 4 Camp. 385 783 

Birch ». Edwards (1847), 5 C. B. 45; 2 Lutw. (Eeg. Cas.) 37; 17 L.J. C.P. 

32 ; 12 Jur. 18 728 

Biroh V. Ld. Liverpool (1829), 9 B. & C. 392, 395 ; 4 M. & R. 380 681 

Biroh V. Eidgway (1858), 1 F; & F. 270 1224 

Birch V. SomerviUe (1852), 2 Ir. C. L. R. 243 900, 906, 910 

Bird ». Adeock (1878), 47 L. J. M. C. 123 ; 26 "W. R. 634 132 

Bird*. Boulter (1833), 4 B. & Ad. 443 730 

Birdj». Gammon (1837), 5Soott,213; 3 Bing. N. C. 883 ; 3 Hodgea, 224. .677, 711 

Bird V. Higginson (1834), 2 A. & E. 696 ; 4 N. & M. 505 ; 1 H. &W. 61 . . 272, 

637, 638 

Bird V. RandaU (1762), 3 Barr. 1345 ; 1 "W. Bl. 373, 387 1115 

Birkenhead, Lane. & Cheshire June. Rail. Co. v. Brownrigg (1849), 6 Railw. 

Cas. 47 ; 4 Ex. 426 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 27 ; 13 Jur. 943 1176 

Birkenhead, Lane. & Cheshire June. Rail. Co. v. Piloher (1860), 6 Ex. 121 ; 

6 Eailw. Cas. 564 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 207 ; 14 Jur. 297 100 

Birkmyr v. Darnell (1704), Salk. 27 ; 1 Smith L. C. 359, 362 676 

Bilks V. Birks (1865), 34 L. J. P. & M. 90 ; 4 S. & T. 23 ; 13 L. T. 193 ; 

13 W. R. 638 704 

Birmg., May of, e. Allen (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 673 ; 6 Ch. D. 284 ; 37 L. T. 

207 ; 25 W. R. 810 114 

Birmg., Brist. & Thames June. Ry. Co. v. White (1841), 1 Q. B. 282 ; 4 P. 

& D. 649 ; 2 Railw. Cas. 863 ; 5 Jur. 800 ; 10 L. J. Q. B. 121 995, 998 

BirreU v. Dryer (1884), 9 App. Cas. 345 ; 51 L. T. 130 ; 6 Asp. M. 0. 267 17 
Birt, Re (1871), L. R. 2 P. & D. 214 ; 40 L. J. P. & M. 26 ; 24 L. T. 142 ; 

19 W. R. 511 699 

Birt «>. Barlow (1779), 1 Doug. 171, 174 150, 295, 373, 1172 

Birt V. RothweU (1697), 1 Ld. Raym. 210, 343 18 

Bishop V. Chambre (1827), 3 C. & P. 55 ; M. & M. 116 1193 

Bishop V. Helps (1845), 2 C. B. 45 ; 15 L. J. C. P. 43 ; 1 Lutw. (Reg. Cas.) 

363 156 

Bishop V. Howard (1823), 2 B. & C. 100 ; 3 Dowl. & R. 293 152 

Bishop V. Countess of Jersey (1854), 2 Drew. 143 ; 2 Eq. R. 545 ; 23 L. J. 

Ch. 483 ; 18 Jur. 766 161 

Bittleaton v. Cooper (1845), 14 M. & W. 399 474 

Bittlestone v. Cooke (1866), 6 E. & B. 296 ; 25 L. J. Q. B. 281 ; 2 Jur. 

N. S. 758 82 

Black V. Lord Braybrook (1816), 2 Stark. 7 ; 6 M. & Sel. 39 ' 62 

Black V. Holmes (1822), 1 Fox & Sm. 28 618 

Black V. Jobling (1869), L. R. 1 P. & D. 685 ; 38 L. J. P. & M. 74; 21 

L. T. 298 ; 17 W. R. 1108 143 

Blackburn v. Hargreave (1828), 2 Lew. C. C. 259 815 

Blackburn v. Mackey (1823), 1 C. & P. 1 168 

Blackburn Guard, v. Brooks (1877), 25 W. R. 57 912 

Blackett v. Lowes (1814), 2 M. & Sel. 494 ; 15 R. R. 324 398 

Blackett v. Roy. Ex. Ass. Co. (1832), 2 C. & J. 244 ; 2 Tyr. 266 765, 766 

Blackball v. Gibson (1878), 2 Ir. L. R. 49 94 

Blackham's case (1708), 1 Salk. 290, 291 1132 

Blaokie v. Ridding (1848), 6 C. B. 196 307 

Blacquiere v. Hawkins (1780), 1 Doug. 380 7 

Blagrave v. Blagrave (1847), 1 De G. & Sm. 262 ; 16 L. J. Ch. 346 ; 11 

Jur. 744 327 

Blague V. Gold (1635), Cro. Car. 447 802 

Blair, Re (1848), 6 Notes of Cas. (Eoc. & M.) 528 701 

Blair v. Ormond (1851), 17 Q. B. 423 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 444 715 

Blake v. Albion Life Ass. Co. (1878), 45 L. J. C. P. 663 ; 36 L. T. 269 ; 

24 W. R. 677 243 

Blake v. Blake (1882), 51 L. J. P. D. & A. 36 ; 7 P. Div. 102 ; 46 L. T. 

641 ; 30 W. R. 505 695, 697 

Blake v. Concannon (1870), 4 Ir. R. C. L. 323 100 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OP CASES CITED. XXXVll 

PAGE 

Blake v. Jennings (1861), 12 Ir. C. L. R. 458 1165 

Blake v. Johnson (1819), Milw. 164 170 

Blake v. KnigM (1843), 3 Curt. 563 696, 697 

Blake v. Pilford (1832), 1 M. & Eob. 198 618, 620 

Blakemore v. Glamorganshire Can. Co. (1835\ 2 C. M. & R. 133; 1 Gale, 

78; 5Tyr. 603 '. 1102, 1109, 1116, 1116 

Bland V. Bland (1866), 36 L. J. P. & M. 104 ; L. E. 1 P. & D. 237 ; 16 

W. E. 9 1110 

Bland v. Swaflord (1791), Peake, 60 831 

Biandy v. Be Burgh (1848), 6 C. B. 623 ; 6 D. & L. 412 ; 5 EaUw. Cas. 

361 ; 18 L. J. C. P. 2 ; 12 Jur. 1005 169 

Blankley v. Winstanley (1789), 3 T. E. 279 ; 1 E. E. 704 791 

Blayney's Trusts, Ee (1875), Ir. E. 9 Eq. 413 798 

Bleakley v. Smith (1840), 11 Sim. 160 670, 674 

Blenkarn v. Longstafie (1885), 84 L. J. Ch. 516 ; 62 L. T. 681 915 

Bleukinsop v. Blenkinsop (1848), 17 L. J. Ch. 343 ; 2 PhOl. 607 603 

Blewett V. Tregonning (1835), 6 N. & M. 308 ; 3 A. & E. 664 ; 1 H. & W. 

432 976 

Blemtt, Inre(1880), 49L. J.P. D. & A. 31; 6P. D. 116; 42L. T. 329; 

28 W. R. 620 700 

Blewitt V. Roberts (1841), Cr. & Ph. 274 ; 10 L. J. Ch. 342 ; 5 Jur. 979. . 144 
Blewitt V. Tritton, (1892) 2 Q. B. 327 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 773 ; 67 L. T. 72 ; 

41 "W. E. 36 282 

Bligh V. Brent (1836-7), 2 T. &.C. Ex. 968 ; 6 L. J. Ex. Eq. 68 683 

Bhgh V. Brewer (1834), 3 D. P. C. 266 ; 1 C. M. & E. 651 ; 5 Tyr. 222 . . 732 

Bligh V. "WeUesley (1826), 2 C. & P. 400 305 

Blight V. Fisher (1809), 1 Pet. C. C. R. 41 873 

Blomington v. Legg (1894), 42 Am. St. R. 216 Add. [220] 

Bloomer v. Spittle (1872), L. R. 13 Eq. 427 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 369 ; 26 L. T. 

272 ; 20 W. R. 436 749 

Bloomfield v. Wharton (1867), Ir. E. 8 C. L. 68 Ill 

Blossom V. Cannon (1817), 14 Mass. 177 122 

Blount V. Burrow (1792), 5 Brown, C. C. 75 480, 482 

Blount V. Harris (1879), 47 L. J. Q. B. 696 ; 48 L. J. Q. B. 159 ; 39 L. T. 

466 ; 27 "W. R. 202 736 

Blount V. Kimpton, (1892) 31 Am. St. R. 564 692 

Blower's Trusts (1871), L. R. 11 Eq. 97 ; 6 Ch. 351 ; 23 L. T. 548 ; 25 

L. T. 181 ; 19 W. R. 121, 666 740 

Blower V. G. W. Ry. Co. (1872), 41 L. J. C. P. 268 ; L. R. 7 C. P. 656 ; 

27 L. T. 883 ; 20 W. R. 776 771 

Blower v. HoUis (1833), 3 Tyr. 366 ; 1 C. & J. 393 1035, 1036 

Bloxam v. Elsee" (1825). 1 C. & P. 658 ; Ry. & M. 187 291 

Bloxam ». Favre (1884), 8 P. D. 101 ; 62 L. J. P. 42 ; 31 "W. R. 610 ; 47 

J. P, 377 703 

Bluok V. Gompertz (1852), 7 Ex. 67 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 25 1195 

Bluck V. Rackman ( 1846), 5 Moo. P. C. R. 308 16, 267 

BlundeU v. CatteraU (1821), 5 B. & A. 293, 298 112 

Blundell v. Gladstone (1841), 11 Sim. 486; 1 PhiUips, 279, 283, 289; 12 

li. J. Ch. 225 739, 784 

Blunt V. Lack (1867), 26 L. J. Ch. 148 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 195 7 

Blyth V. Archhold (1835), Pears. Chit. PI. 330, n. (4) 147 

Blyth V. Dennett (1853), 13 C. B. 178 ; 22 L. J. C. P. 79 523 

Boardman v. Jackson (1813), 2 Ball & B. 382 627 

Boardman v. Reed and Ford's Lessees (1832), 6 Pet. 328, 345 801 

Boast V. Firth (1868), L. R. 4 C. P. 1 ; 38 L. J. C. P. 1 ; 19 L. T. N. S. 

264 ; 17 W. R. 29 780 

Boddington v. Schlencker (1833), 4 B. & Ad. 572 ; 1 N. & M. 541 ; 2 L. 

J. K. B. 138 32 

Boddy ». Boddy (I860), 30 L. J. P. & M. 23 243 

Boddy V. Wall (1877), 7 Ch. Div. 164 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 112 ; 26 W. E. 348. . 187 
Bodger v. Arch (1864), 10 Ex. 333 ; 2 C. L. E. 1491 ; 24 L. J. Ex. 19. .714, 716 
Bodmin United Mines Co., Re (1866), 23 Beav. 370 ; 26 L. J. Ch. 670 ; 

3 Jur. N. S. 360 7 

Vol. I. ends with pa^e 635. 



XXXVIU TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAGB 

Body, Re (1864), 34 L. J. P. & M. 55 ; 4 S. & T. 9 307 

Boehtlinck v. Schneider (1799), 3 Esp. 58 ; 3 East, 381 ; 7 E,. E.. 490 936 

Bogert V. Cauman (1807-51), Anthon JR. 70 743 

Bohuu V. Delessert (1813), 2 Coop. 21 129, 424 

Boileaut). Rutlin (1848), 2 Ex. 678 500, 531, fS2, 1158 

Bolckow V. Seymour (1864), 17 C. B. N. S. 107 44 

Bold V. Hutchinson (1855), 24 L. J. Ch. 285 ; 20 BeaT. 250 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 

365 ; 3 Eq. Eep. 743 639, 679, 749 

Bold V. Eayner (1836), 1 M. & W. 343 ; 2 Gale, 44 ; 5 L. J. Ex. 172 . .299, 763 
Bolding V. Lane (1863), 1 De G. J. & S. 122 ; 32 L. J. Ch. 219 ; 11 W. R. 

386 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 506 720 

Boldron v. "Widdows (1824), 1 C. & P. 65 219, 230 

Bolingbroke, Ld. v. Local Board of Swindon (1874), 43 L. J. C. P. 287 ; 

L. R. 9 C. P. 575 ; 30 L. T. 723 587 

Bolingbroke, Ld. v. Townsend (1873), L. B. 8 C. P. 645 ; 42 L. J. 0. P. 

255 ; 29 L. T. 430 191 

BoUand, Ex parte. Re Aokary (1876), 45 L. J. Bank. 133 ; 3 Ch. D. 125 ; 

34 L. T. 666 ; 24 W. R 932 851 

BoUand, Ex parte, Re Holden (1874), L. R. 19 Eq. 131 ; 44 L. J. Bk. 9 ; 

31L. T. 445; 24 W. R. 24 849 

Bolton V. Bolton (1876), 2 Ch. D. 217 ; 34 L. T. 123 ; 24 W. R. 426 1036 

Bolton v. Bp. of Carlisle (1793), 2 H. Bl. 263 659, 1198 

Bolton V. Gladstone (1804), 5 East, 155 ; 1 Smith, 372 ; 2 Taun. 85 ; 7 R. 

R. 674 1149 

Bolton V. Corp. of Liverpool (1833), 1 Myl. & K. 94 ; Cooper, 19 ; 1 L. J. 

Ch. 166 593, 601, 606, 1183 

Bolton V. Corp. of Liverpool (1831), 1 Myl. & K. 88 ; 3 Sira. 467 995 

Bolton V. Lambert (1889), 41 Ch. D. 295 ; 58 L. J. Ch. 425 ; 60 L. T. 687 ; 

37 W. R. 434 672 

Bolton V. London School Board (1878), 7 Ch. D. 766 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 461 ; 

38 L. T. 277 ; 26 "W. R. 549 123 

Bolton «;. O'Brien (1885), 16 L. R. Ir. 97 46, 243 

Bolton 1). Sherman (1837), 2 M. & W. 403 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 147 607 

Bolton, Ld. V. Tomlin (1836), 1 N. & P. 247 ; 5 A. & E. 856 ; 1 C. & J. 391 926 

Bond V. Douglas (1836), 7 C. & P. 626 245 

Bond ». Evans (1888), 21 Q. B. D. 249; 57 L. J. M. C. 105; 59 L. T. 

411; 36 W. R. 767; 52 J. P. 612 107 

Bond V. Rosling (1861), 1 B. & S. 371 ; 30 L. J. Q. B. 227 ; 4 L. T. 442 ; 

9W. R. 746 649 

BoneUi, Re (1875), L. R. 1 P. Div. 69 ; 45 L. J. P. D. & A. 42 ; 34 L. T. 

32 ; 24 "W. R. 255 , 938 

Bonfield D. Smith (1844). 2 M. & Rob. 519 270, 929 

Bonner, Re, Tucker «. Good (1881), 19 Ch. D. 201 ; 51 L. J. Ch 83 ■ 45 

L. T. 470 ; 30 "W. R. 58 145 

Bonnewell v. Jenkins (1878), 8 Ch. D. 70 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 758 ; 38 L. T 81 ' 

26 W. R. 294 673 

Bonzi v. Stewart (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 295 ; 5 Scott, N. R. 1 ' " ' 534 

Booker v. Allen (1831), 2 Russ. & M. 270 ; 9 L. J. Ch. 130 .'.!!."!!! 807 

Boorman v. Johnston (1834), 12 Wend. 573 741 

Boom's Case (1819), cited Greenleaf on Evid. 290 .".'."."." 656 

Boosey D. Davidson (1849), 13 Q. B. 2.i7 ; 18 L. J. Q. B. niVisJur.Ms' 299 

Booth v. Briscoe (1877), 2 Q. B. D. 496 ; 25 "W. R. 838 187 
Booth V. Clive (1851), 10 C. B. 827 ; 2 L. M. & P. 283 ; 20 L. j.' c" 'p. 

151 ; 15 Jur. 563 227 

Booth V. Kennard (1858), 2 H. & N. 84 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 305 ." ' ." 43 

Boothj).MillDs(1846),4DowI.&L.52; 15M.&W. 669; 15 L.J. Ex 354" 271 272 

Booth©. Turle (1873), L. R. 16 Eq. 182; 21 "W. R. 721 " '665 

Bootle V. Blundell (1815), 19 Vea. 494 ; 13 R. R. 254 .',,'. 1215 

Borthwlok Pier. (1812), Pari. Min 62 !!!!!!!!!! 423 

Bosanquet, Re (1852), 2 Roberts. 577 !.!!!!!!!! 696 

Boeanquet v. Anderson (1806), 6 Esp. 44 g^y 

Bosville V. Attornev-General (1887), 12 P. D. 177 ; 66 L. J. P. 97 • '57 "i," 

T. 88 ; 36 "W. R." 79 '. .' 101 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. XXXIX 

FAOB 

BoBweU V. Smith (1833), 6 C. & P. 60 154 

Bosworth V. 'Crotohett (1824), 1 Ph. Ev. 300 447, 451 

Botham v. Swingler (1794), 1 Esp. 164 ; 1 Pea. 285 910 

Bothe's case (16U2), Moo. (F.) 666 985 

Bothnia, The (1860), Lush. 52 ; 29 L. J. P. M. & A. 65 ; 36 L. T. 0. S. 

160 176 

Botting V. Martin (1808), 1 Camp. 317 656 

Bottomley v. Forhes (1838), 6 Scott, 816 ; 6 Bing. N. C. 121 ; 1 Arn. 481 ; 

2 Jur. 1016 782 

Boucher v. Lawson (undated), Caa. temp. Hard. 9 1 150 

Boucher v. Murray (1844), 6 Q. B. 362 ; 13 L. J. Q. B. 278 192 

Bouchier v. Taylor (1776), 4 Bro. P. C. 708 1103, 1105 

BouiUon V. Lupton (1863), 15 C. B. N. S. 113 ; 33 L. J. C. P. 37 ; 10 Jur. 

N. S. 422 : 8 L. T. N. S. 575 ; 11 "W. K. 966 770 

Boulter v. Peplow (1850), 9 C. B. 493 ; 19 L. J. C. P. 191 ; 14 Jur. 248..291, 292, 

296 

Boulton's case (1835), Milw. 36 502 

Bourd V. Lawrence, (1892) 1 Q. B. 226 ; 61 L. J. M. C. 21 ; 65 L. T. 844; 

40 W. E. 1; 56 J. P. 118 779 

Bourdin v. Green-wood (1872), L. R. 13 Eq. 281 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 73 ; 25 L. T. 

782 ; 20 W. E. 166 713 

Bourke v. Davis (1890), 44 Ch. D. 110 ; 62 L. T. 34 ; 38 W. R. 167 915 

Bourno !>. Coulter (1884), 53 L. J. Ch. 699 ; 50 L. T. 321 186 

Bourne v. Fosbrooke (1865), 18 C. B. N. S. 515 ; 34 L. J. C. P. 164 .... 639 
Bourne v. GatlifEe (1841), 3 M. & Gr. 643, 689, 690 ; 3 Scott, N. K. 1 . .43, 7«2 

Bouts v. Tuokerman (1811), 7 Johns. 538 870 

Bousfield V. Mould (1847), 1 De G. & Sm. 347 ; 11 Jur. 902 910 

Bovill «. Pimm (1866), 11 Ex. 718 ; 26 L. T. 0. S. 312 43 

Bowden v. Henderson (1854), 2 Sm. & G. 360 172 

Bowden v. Home (1831), 7 Bing. 716 1124 

Bowen v. Owen (1847), 11 Q. B. 130 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 5 ; 11 Jur. 972 ... . 48 

Bowerbank v. Monteiro (1813), 4 Taun. 844 ; 14 E. R. 679 755 

Bowers v. Bowers (1850), 1 Abb. (N. Y.) App. Deo. 214 766 

Bowers t>. Nizon (1847), 2 C. & Kir. 372 189, 192 

Bowes V. Foster (1858), 2 H. & N. 779 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 262 91, 481, 552 

Bowes V. Pontifex (1863), 3 F. & F. 739 692 

Bowes v. Shand (1877), 2 App. Cas. 455 ; 46 L. J. Q. B. 561 ; 36 L. T. 857; 

25 W. E. 730 . . : 42 

Bowey V. BeU (1878), 4 Q. B. D. 95 ; 48 L. J. Q. B. 161 ; 39 L. T. 607 ; 

27 "W. E. 247 41 

Bowker v. Burdekiu (1843), 11 M. & W. 128 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 329 1204 

Bowlby V. Bell (1846), 3 C. B. 284 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 18 685 

Bowles V. Jackson (1854), 1 Notes of Cas. (Eco. & M.) 294 702 

Bowles ». Johnson (1748), 1 W. Bl. 36 815, 819 

Bowles V. Langworthy (1793), 5 T. E. 366 ; 1 Doug. 216, n. (/) 1208 

Bowman, Ee (1834), 5 B. & Ad. 1113 988 

Bowman ». Bowman (1843), 2 M. & Eob. 501 921, 1209, 1215 

Bowman v. Hodgson (1867), L. E. 1 P. 362; 36 L. J. P. 124; 16 L. T. 392 278 

Bowman v. Horsey (1837), 2 M. & Eob. 85 764 

Bowman «.-. Manzelman (1809), 2 Camp. 315; 11 E. R. 716 319 

Bowman v. Nichol (1794), 5 T. E. 537 ; 1 Esp. 81 1194 

Bowman v. Norton (1S31), 5 C. & P. 177 599, 603 

Bowman v. Eostron (1835), 2 A. & E. 295 ; 4 N. & M. 452 89, 552 

Bowman v. Taylor (1835), 4 N. & M. 264 ; 2 A. & E. 278, 279 88, 93 

Bowring v. Shepherd (1870), L. E. 6 Q. B. 309 ; 40 L. J. Q. B. 129 ; 24 

L. T. 721 ; 19 "W. E. 852 158 

Bowsher v. CaUey (1808), 1 Camp. 391, u. ; 10 E. E. 711, n 385 

Boyoe v. Douglas (1807), 1 Camp. 60 1115 

Boyce v. Green (1826), Batty, 608 671, 684 

Boyd V. Bolton (1844), 8 Ir. Eq. E. 113 523, 527, 528 

Boyd V. M'Lean (1815), 1 Johns. Ch. (Am.) 582 667 

Boyd V. Petrie (1868), 19 W. E. 221 1189 

Boyd V. The State (undated), 2 Humph. 37 671 

Vol. I. ends with page 63d. 



xl TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOE 

Boydell v. Drummond (1809), 11 East, 142 ; 10 E. E. 450 673, 681 

Boydell's case (1830), Maoq. H. of L. Practice, 651 502 

Boyes v. Bedale (1863), 1 H. & M. 798 ; 10 L. T. 131 ; 12 W. E. 232 ; 33 

L. J. Ch. 233 145 

Boyle V. MulhoUand (1860), 10 Ir. C. L. E. 150 803 

Boyle ». Wiseman (1855), 11 Ex. 360; 24 L. J. Ex. 284 26, 309, 964 

Boynton v. Kellogg (1807), 3 Mass. 189 255, 973 

Boys V. Williams (1831), 2 Euss. & My. 689 78-0 

Boyse v. Colclougla (1854), 1 K. & J. 124 ; 2 W. E. 354 ; 24 L. J. Ch. 7. . 1 145 

Bracegirdle v. Heald (1818), 1 B. & Aid. 722 681 

Braoegirdle v. Hinks (1854), 9 Ex. 361 ; 2 C. L. E. 991 ; 23 L. J. Ex. 128; 

18 Jut. 70 222 

Bradford v. Eomuey (1862), 30 Beav. 431, 438 : 31 L. J. Ch. 497 749 

Bradford ». Young (1884), 29 Ch. D. 617 ; 53 L. T. 407 ; 33 W. E. 860 ; 

54 L. J. Ch. 96 1105 

Bradlaugh v. Grossett (1884), 12 Q. B. D. 271 ; 53 L. J. Q. B. 209 ; 53 

L. T. 620 ; 32 W. E. 552 4 

Bradlaugh v. E. (1878), 3 Q. B. D. 607 ; 38 L. T. 118 : 26 W. E. 410 . . 85 

Bradley v. Arthur (1825), 6 Dowl. & E. 413 ; 4 B. & C. 292 932 

Bradley v. Beckett (1844), 7 M. & Gr. 994 89 

Bradley v. Bradley (1834), 2 Fairf. 367 1117 

Bradley ». Holds-worth (1838), IH.&H. 156; 3M.&W.422; 7L.J.Ex 153.. 683 

Bradley v. James (1853), 13 C. B. 822 ; 22 L. J. 0. P. 193 442, 448 

Bradley v. Pilots of Newcastle (1853), 2 E. & B. 427 ; 23 L. J. Q. B. 35. . 792 

Bradshaw v. Bennett (1831), 5 C. & P. 48 ; 1 M. & Eob. 143 1211 

Bradshaw v. Murphy (1836), 7 C. & P. 612 969, 997 

Bradstreet v. Nept. Ins. Co. (1838), 3 Sumn. 600 1142, 1147, 1150 

Brady v. Cubitt (1778), 1 Doug. 31, 39 667 

Brady v. Curran (1868), 2 Ir. E. C. L. 314 ; 16 W. E. 514 508 

Brady v. Oastler (1864), 3 H. & C. 112 ; 33 L. J. Ex. 300 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 

22 ; 11 L. T. N. S. 681 745 

Brady v. Tod (1861), 30 L. J. C. P. 224 ; 9 C. B. N. S. 592 ; 4 L. T. 212 ; 

9 W. E. 483 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 827 388 

Brain v. Preece (1843), 11 M. & W. 773 455 

Braithwaite v. Gardiner (1845), 8 Q. B 473 ; 15 L. J. Q. B. 187 ; 10 Jur. 591 646 
Brake, Ee (1881), 60 L. J. P. D. & A. 43; 6 P. Div. 217 ; 45 L. T. 191 ; 

• 29 W. E. 744 798 

Bramble, Ex parte. In re Toleman, &c. (1880), 13 Ch. D. 885 ; 42 L. T. 

413 ; 28 W. E. 676 321 

Bramwell v. Lucas (1824), 4 Dowl. & E. 367 ; 2 B. & C. 746 608 

Brandao v. Bamett (1846), 6 M. & Gr. 630 5 

Brandford v. Freeman (1850), 2 Ex. 734 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 36 272 

Branford v. Branford (1879), 4 P. D. 72 ; 48 L. J. Mat. 40 ; 40 L. T. 659 ; 

27 W. E. 691 604 

Branton v. Griffits (1877), 2 C. P. D. 212 ; 46 L. J. C. P. 408 ; 36 L. T. 4; 

29 W. E. 313 736 

Branwell v. Penneck (1827), 7 B. & C 536 1136 

Brashier ». Jackson (1840), 6 M. & W. 549; 8 D. P. C. 784; 9 L. J. 

Ex. 313 192, 193, 194 

Brassington v. Brassington (1823), 1 S. & St. 455 321 

Bray v. Hadwen (1816), 5 M. & Sel. 68 32 

Braye Peer. (1836-39), 6 CI. & Fin. 757 •. 403 

Brazier v. Jones (1828), 8 B. & C. 124 ' . 1038 

Breadalbane Case (1866), L. E. 1 H. L. (So.) 182 106, 149 

Breadalbane, M. of, p. M. of Chandos (1837), 2 My. & Cr. 732 ; 4 CI & F 

43 ; 7 L. J. Ch. 28 1124 

Breadalbane Peer. (1872), L. E. 2 H. L. (So.) 269 181 

Breckon v. Smith (1834), 1 A. & E. 488 " " " 517 

Breech Loadg. Arm. Co., Ee (1867), L. E. 4 Eq. 453 ; 15 W. E. 1007 '. ! 845 

Breeze v. Hawker (1844), 14 Sim. 350 , . , _ IO54 

Brembridge v. Osborne (1816), 1 Stark. E. 374 ; 18 E. E. 784 ] 154 

Bremer v. Freeman (1857), 1 Deane, Ecc. E. 192 936 937 

Brenan's case (1847), 10 Q. B 498 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 289 ; 11 Jur. 776 7, 83 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. xli 

PAGE 

Brenohley e. Still (1850), 2 Roberts. 162 697 

Breunan ». Dillane (1843), Ir. Oir. C. 853 1035 

Brennan v. Howard (1856), 1 H. & N. 138 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 289 ; 2 Jur. 

N. S. 546 192, 194 

Brennan (should be Breenan) v. Moran (1867), 6 Ir. Ch. R. 126 805 

Brest t). Lever (1841), 7 M. &W. 693; 9 D. P. C. 246 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 337.. 118 
Breton's Estate, In re (1881), 17 Ch. D. 416 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 369 ; 44 L. T. 

337 ; 29 W. R. 777 639 

Breton v. Cope (1791), Peake, 31 154, 1054, 1092, 1173, 1208 

Brett V. Beales (1829), 10 B. & C. 508 ; M. & M. 416 397, 403, 433, 1006 

Brettel v. "Williams (1849), 4 Ex. 623 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 123 161 

Bretton v. Prettiman (1666), T. Ray. 153 498 

Brew «. Haren (1877), 11 Ir. R. C. L. 29 1116, 1161 

Brewer v. Knapp (18-^3), 1 Pick. 337 154 

Brewer v. Pahner (1800), 3 Esp. 213 285 

Brewing Co. v. Beaner (1893*), 40 Am. St. R. 686 Add. [220] 

Brewis, Re (1864), 33 L. J. P. & M. 124 ; 3 S. & T. 473 701 

Brewster, Re (1860), 3 8. & T. 473 ; 33 L. J. P. 124 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 593. . 706 

Brewster v. Sewell (1820), 3 B. & Aid. 296 277, 302, 303, 306, 323 

Brioe v. Bannister (1878), 3 Q. B. D. 569 ; 47 L. J. Q. B. 722 ; 38 L. T. 

739 ; 26 W. R. 670 513, 651 

Briokell v. Hulse (1837), 7 A. & E. 456 ; 2 N. & P. 426 600 

Bridge v. Eggleston (1817), 14 Mass. 245 514 

Bridge v. Gray (1833), 14 Pick. 65 1123 

Bridge ». Sumner (1823), 1 Pick. 371 1139 

Bridges v. N. Lond. Ry. (1874), L. R. 7 H. L. 213 ; 43 L. J. Q. B. 161 ; 

30 L. T. 844 ; 23 W. R. 62 38 

Bridges V. Potts (1864), 17 C. B. N. S. 314 ; 33 L. J. C. P. 338 ; 10 Jur. 

N. S. 1049 ; 11 L. T. 373 35 

Bridget Feltham, Re (1866), 1 K. & J. 528 798 

Bridgewater, Ld., case of (undated), cited Skin. 16 1179 

Bridgman v Jennings (1699), 1 Ld. Raym. 734 ; B. N. P. 283a 610 

Bridgwater Trust v. Bootle-oum-Linacre (1866), L. R. 2 Q. B. 4 ; 36 L. J. 

Q. B. 41; 7B. &S. 348 HI, 112 

Bridson v. Smith (1876), 24 W. R. 392 534 

Brian v. Swainson (1877), 1 L. R. Ir. 136 673 

Briggs, Ex parte (1859), 28 L. J. Q. B. 272 ; 1 E. & E. 881 993 

Briggs V. Aynsworth (1838), 2 M. & Rob. 168 274 

Briggs V. Briggs (1880), 6 P. D. 163 ; 49 L. J. P. 38 ; 28 W. R. 702 .... 1143 

Briggs V. Wilson (1853), 5 De G. M & G. 12 ; 17 Beav. 330 448, 461, 712 

Brigham v. Rogers (1822), 17 Mass. 571 767 

Bright V. Hutton (1851-2), 2 H. L. Cas. 341 ; 16 Jur. 696 540, 641 

Bright V. Legerton (1860-1), 30 L. J. Ch. 338 ; 2 De G. & J. 421 ; 8 W. R. 

678 455 

Brighti!."Walker(1834), IC. M. &R. 222; 3L. J. Ex. 250; 4 Tyr. 502. .119, 128 
Brigstocke v. Smith (1833), 1 C. M. & R. 483 ; 3 Tyr. 446 ; 2 L. J. Ex. 187 . . 710, 

712 

Brine v. Bazalgette (1849), 3 Ex. 692 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 348 252, 253 

Bringloe «. Goodson (1839), 8 Soott, 71 ; 5 Bing. N. C. 738 ; 1 Am. 322. . 1208, 

1213 
Brinsmead v. Harrison (1871), L. R. 7 C. P. 547 ; 41 L. J. C. P. 190 ; 27 

L. T. 99 ; 20 W. R. 784 1114 

Brisco V. Lomax (1838). 3 N. & P. 308 ; 8 A. & B. 198 ; 2 Jur. 682 . .233, 396, 

398, 404, 405, 1109 

Briscoe V. Stephens (1824), 9 Moore (C. P.) 413 ; 2 Bing. 213 1133 

Bristol Aerated Bread Co. «. Maggs (1890), 44 Ch. D. 616 ; 59 L. J. Ch. 

472; 62L. T. 416; 38 W. R. 393 672 

Bristol, City of, v. Wait (1834), 3 N. & M. 359 ; 1 A. & E. 264 303 

Bristol, May. of, ». Cox (1884), 26 Ch. D. 678; 53 L. J. Ch. 1144; 50 

L. T. 719; 33 W. R. 255 1182, 1183 

Bristow V. Brown (1862), 13 Ir. C. L. R. 201 773 

Bristow». Cormican (1878), 3 App. Cas. 641, 667 Ill, 301, 432 

Bristow V. Miller (1848), 11 Ir. L. R. 461 387, 716 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



xlii TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

Bristow v. Sequeville (1850), 5 Ex. 275 ; 3 0. & K. 64 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 289 ; 

14 Jnr. 674 61, 938 

Bristow v. Wright (1 781), 2 Doug. 666 ; 1 T. R. 235, n 187 

Britain v. Bossiter (1879), 11 Q. B. D. 123 ; 48 L. J. Ex. 362 ; 40 L. T. 

240 ; 27 W. R. 482 681 

Briti.ih Empire Asa. Co. v. Browne (1852), 12 C. B. 723 ; 22 L. J. C. P. 49; 

16 Jut. 1157 676 

British Farmers' Pure Line. Cake Co., Re (1878), 7 Ch. D. 533 ; 47 L. J. 

Ch. 415 ; 38 L. T. 45 : 26 W. R. 334 1076 

British Linen Co. v. Drummond (1835), 10 B. & C. 903 52 

British Prov. Life and Fire Ass. Co., Re {see Grady's Case). 

Brittain v. Kinnaird (1849), 4 Moore, C. P. 50 ; 1 B & B. 432 ; Grow, 164 . . 1098, 

1099, 1108, 1136 

Britten, Ex parte (1840), 3 Deac. & Chit. 35 '. 865 

Brittlebank v. Smith (1884), 50 L. T. 491 1031 

Broad v. Ham (1839), 5 Bing. N. C. 722 ; 8 Scott, 40 ; 8 L. J. C. P. 357 . . 30 

Broad v. Pitt (1828), 3 C. & P. 518 693, 591, 696 

Brooas v. Lloyd (1867) 23 Beav. 129 ; 26 L. J. Ch. 768 ; 4 W. R. 540 ; 2 

Jur. N. S. 556 819, 832 

Brook V. Kent (1807), 1 Camp. 366, n. ; 10 R. R. 706, n 498 

Brockbank v. Anderson (1844), 7 M. & a. 295 ; 13 L. J. C. P. 102 910 

Brodie v. Brodie (1861), 2 S. & T. 259 ; 30 L. J. Mat. 185 ; 4 L. T. 307 ; 

9 W. R. 815 377 

Brodie v. Howard (1856), 17 C. B. 109 ; 25 L. J. C. P. 67 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 

1209 179, 492 

Brogan's case (undated), 2 Russ. Cr. & M. 874 (4th ed.) 685 

Bromage v. Prosser (1825), 4 B. & C. 247 ; 6 D. & R. 296 ; 1 C. & P. 

476 110 

Bromley v. Smith (1859), 26 Beay. 644, 665 ; 29 L. J. Ch. 18 ; 6 Jur. 

N. S. 833 137 

Bromley v. Wallace (1803), 4 Esp. 237 264 

Bromwich's ease (1666), 1 Lev. 180 340 

Brook and Delcomyn, Re (1864), 16 C. B. N.S. 403; 33 L.J. C. P. 246 .. 1147 
Brook V. Hook (1871), L. R. 6 Ex. 89 ; 40 L. J. Ex. 50 ; 24 L. T. 34 ; 19 

W. R. 508 44 

Brook V. Jenney (1841), 2 Q. B. 273 ; 1 G. & D. 567 ; 11 L. J. M. C. 10 . . 132 

Brooke, Re, {see Brooke v. Kent). 

Brooke v. Brooke (1881), 17 Ch. D. 833 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 528 ; 44 L. T. 512 ; 

30 W. R. 45 13 

Brooke v. Hayraes (1868), L. R. 6 Eq. 25 - 93 

Brooke v. Kent (1840), 3 Moo. P. C.-C. 334 ; 2 Curt. 343 708 

Brooker v. Scott (1843), 11 M. & W. 67 49 

Brooks V. Mitchell (1841), 9 M. & W. 16 ; 11 L. J. Ex. 51 612 

Broom v. Batchelor (1856), 1 H. & N. 256 ; 25 L. J. Ex. 299 787 

Broome v. Wootton (1606), Telv. 67 ; Cro. Jac. 73 ; Moo. (F.) 762 1115 

Broomfield v. Smith (1836), 2 Gale, 114 ; 1 M. & W. 642 ; 5 L. J. Ex. 156 . . 222 

Brough V. Parkings (1703), 2 Ld. Raym. 994 16 

Brounker, Ld. ». Atkyns (1682), Skin. 14 1179 

Brown, Ex parte (1854), 19 Beav. 97 526 

Brown, Re (1849), 1 Rob. 710 698 

Brown, Be (1858), 27 L. J. P. & M. 20 ; 1 Sw. & Tr. 32 ; 30 L. T. 353 ; 

2 Jur. N. S. 244 143, 366, 706, 708 

Brown, Be (1889), 61 L. T. 463 793 

Brown and Croyd. Can. Co., Re (1839), 9 A. & E. 526 1160 

Brown ti.Ackroyd (1856), 5 E. &B. 819; 25L. J. Q. B. 193 ; 2 Jur. N.S. 

283 166 

Brown v. Armstrong (1873), 7 Ir. C. L. R. 130 296 

Brown (should be Broom) v. Batchelor (1856), 1 H. &N. 266; 25 L.J. Ex. 

299 787 

Brown v. Brown (1836), 1 Keen, 275 114 

Brown v. Brown (1868), 27 L. J. Q. B. 173 ; 8 E. & B. 876 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 

163 ; 1 S. & T. 32 ; 27 L. J. P. 20 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 244 143, 356, 705, 709 

Brown V. Brown (1869), 38 L. J. P. & M. 78 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 720 360 

X'he references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. xHii 

FAOB 

Brown v. Brown and Paget (1874), 33 L. J. P. 198 ; 43 L. J. Mat. 33 ; 

30 L. T. N. S. 767 ; 22 "W. R. 759 881 

Brown v. Byrne (1854), 3 El. & B. 703 ; 2 C. L. R. 1599 ; 23 L. J. Q. B. 

313 ; 18 Jut. 700 768 

Brown v. Dawson (1705), Preo. in Oh. 240 806 

Brown v. Eastern Counties Ey. Co. (1889), 22 Q. B. D. 391 ; 58 L. J. 

Q. B. 212 231, Add. [220] 

Brown v. Edgington (1841), 2 M. & Gr. 279 ; 2 Soott, N. R. 496 ; 1 Drink. 

106 ; 10 L. J. C. P. 66 777 

Brown v. Foster (1857), 1 H. & N. 736 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 249 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 

245 605, 609, 611 

Brown v. Getotell (1814), 11 Mass. 11 871 

Brown v. Goodwin (1841), Ir. Cir. Rep. 61 257 

Brown v. Kempton (1850), 19 L. J. C. P. 169 82 

Brown v. Langley (1842), 6 Soott, N. R. 249 ; 4 M. & Gr. 466 ; 12 L. J. 

C. P. 62 755 

Brown v. Leeson (1792), 2 H. Bl. 43 ; 3 R. R. 341 621 

Brown v. M'Dermott (1840), 2 Ir. Eq. R. 438 869 

Brown v. Payson (18;«), 6 New Hamp. 443 609, 611 

Browin). Pearson (1882), 21 Ch. D. 716; 46 L. T. 411 ; 30 W. R. 436 . . . 5i4 

Brown v. Perkins (1843), 2 Hare, 540 ; 11 L. J. Ch. 307 605 

Brown v. Philpot (1840), 2 M. & Rob. 285 261 

Brown v. Pinkham (1836), 18 Pick. 172 1196 

Brown v. Robins (1859), 4 H. & N. 186 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 250 114 

Brown v. Symons (1860), 29 L. J. C. P. 251 ; 8 C. B. N. S. 208 ; 6 Jur. 

N. S. 1079 ; 8 W. R. 460 152 

Brown v. Thornton (1837), 1 N. & P. 339 ; 6 A. & E. 185 ; 6 L. J. K. B. 82 62 

Brown V. Wood (1820), 17 Mass. 68 122 

Brown v. Woodman (1834), 6 C. & P. 206 300, 356 

Brown ?;. Wren, 16 R. (Feb.) 281 ; (1895) 1 Q. B. 390; 43 W. R. 351. .^(^i. [169] 
Brown's case (1673), 1 Vent. 243 ; 1 Russ. C. &M. 709; 2 Russ. C. &M.984 893 

Browne D. Gumming (1829), 10 B. &C. 70; 5 M. &R. lis 986 

Browne v. Gisbome (1843), 2 Dowl. K. S. 963 ; 12 L. J. Q. B. 297 ; 

7 Jur. 328 836 

Browne v. Murray (1825), Ry. & M. 254 272 

BrowneUt). Bonney (1841), 4P. & D. 523; 1 Q. B. 39 ; 5 Jur. 6 521 

Browning v. Biidd (1848), 6 Moo. P. C. C. 430 140 

Browning v. Paris (1839), 5 M. & W. 117 ; 7 Dowl. 398 ; 2 H. & H. 66 ; 

8 L. J. Ex. 222 714 

Browning v. Sabiu (1877), 6 Ch. D. 511 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 728 ; 25 W. R. 602 834 

Brownsword v. Edwards (1751), 2 Ves. sen. 245 960, 961, 1116, 1132 

Bruce v. Bruce (1790), 2 Bos. & P. 230, n 179 

Bruce v. Nioolopulo (1855), 11 Ex. 129 ; 24 L. J. Ex. 321 129, 309 

Bruce v. Wait (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 39 ; 1 Scott, N. R. 81 ; 9L. J. C. P. 237 7 

Bruin v. Knott (1842), 12 Sim. 452-456 ; 6 Jur. 885 7 

Brune v. Thompson (1842), 2 Q. B. 789 : 2 G. & D. 110 ; Car. & M. 34 ; 

11 L. J. Q. B. 131 17, 443, 792 

Brunner, In re (1887), 19 Q. B. D. 572 ; 56 L. J. Q. B. 606 ; 57 L. T. 

418 ; 35 W. R. 719 ; 4 Morr. B. R. 255 340 

Brunsden v. Humphrey (1884), 11 Q. B. D. 712 ; 52 L. J. Q. B. 766 .... 1120 

Brunswick, D. of, «. Harmer (1850), 3 C. & K. 10 929 

BrunswickGasCo.s. United Gas Co. (1893), 35 Am. St. R. 385 Add.\).69)^ 

Brutt V. Pioard (1824), R. & M. 37 1196 

Bryan v. Child (1860), 6 Ex. 368 ; 1 L. M. & P. 429 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 264 ; 

14 Jur. 510 735 

Bryan v. WagstafE (1825), 8 Dowl. & R. 208 ; 5 B. & C. 314 ; R. & M. 329 ; 

2 C. & P. 126 315 

Bryan v. AVhite (1850), 2 Roberts. 315 700 

Bryan v. Winwood (1808), 1 Tauu. 208 ; 9 R. R. 751 116, 233 

Bryan Reynolds, Re (1873), 42 L. J. P. & M. 20 ; L. R. 3 P. & D. 35 ; 

28 L. T. 144 ; 21 W. R. 512 709 

Bryant v. Foot (1868), L. R. 3 Q. B. 497 ; 37 L. J. Q. B. 217 ; 9 B. & S. 

444 ; 18 L. T. 687 ; 16 W. R. 808 16, 123 

Vol. I. ends with, page 635, 



xliv TABLE OP CASES CITED. 

Bryant v. Herbert (1877), 3 C. P. D. 189, 389 ; 47 L. J. 0. P. 670 ; 39 

ii. T. 17 ; 26 W. B. 898 40 

Bryant ». Lefever (1879), 4 C. P. D. 172; 48 L. J. C. P. 380 ; 40 L. T. 

679 ; 27 W. R. 592 76, 125 

Bryoe, Re (1839), 2 Curt. 325 700 

Brydges v. Branfill (1841), 12 Sim. 334 ; 11 L. J. Ch. 12 348 

Brydges v. Walford (1817). 6 M. & Sel. 42 ; 1 Stark. 389 ; 18 R. R. 787, n. 549 
Bucoleuoh, D. of, «. Met. Bd. of Works (lh72), L. R. 6 H. L. 418 ; 41 

L. J. Ex. 137 ; 27 L. T. 1 612 

Buchanan v. Ruoker (1808), 1 Camp. 63 ; 9 East, 192 ; 9 R. R. 531 . .1147, 1154 

Buoher v. Jarratt (1802), 3 Bos. & P. 143 289, 290, 318 

Buck V. Robson (1878), 3 Q. B. D. 686 ; 39 L. T. 325 ; 26 W. R. 804 ; 48 

L. J. Q. B. 250 651 

Buckell V. Blenkhom (1846), 5 Hare, 131 693 

Backet v. Church (1840), 9 C. & P. 209 44, 710 

Buckhouse v. Crossby (1737), 2 Eq. Cas. Ab. 32, pi. 44 752 

Buckingham, D. of, ». Com. of Inl. Rev. (1851), 2 L. M. & P. 311 ; 6 Ex. 

464 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 269 277 

Buckland v. Johnson (1854), 15 C. B. 145 ; 2 C. L. R. 784 ; 23 L. J. C. P. 

204; 18 Jur. 775 191,1115, 1118, 1120 

Buckle V. Knoop (1867), L. R. 2 Ex. 333 ; 36 L. J. Ex. 49, 223 ; 16 L. T. 

571; 15W. K. 999 157, 781 

Buckler v. Millerd (1689), 2 Ventr. 107 746 

Buckley v. Beardslee (1819), 2 South. 670 669 

Buckley v. Cooke (1864), 1 K. & J. 29 ; 24 L. J. Ch. 24 ; 3 Eq. Rep. 138 ; 

3 W. R. 33 940 

Buckley v. Littlebury (1711), 3 Bro. P. C. 43 805 

Buckley v. V. S. (1846), 4 How. Sup. Ct. Rep. 258 1050 

Buckmaster v. Meiklejohn (1861), 8 Ex. 634 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 242 631 

Buckmaster v. Russell (1861), 10 C. B. N. S. 745 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 155 712 

Bnckmasters v. Cox (1839), 2 Ir. L. R. 101 870 

Buokminster v. Perry (1808), 4 Mass. 693 ■. 931 

Buckton «. Higgs (1879), 4 Ex. D. 174 ; 40 L. T. 755 ; 27 "W. R. 803 ... . 636 

BuU V. Loveland (1830), 10 Pick. 9, 14 698, 969 

Bulls. O'Sumvan (1871), L.R.6Q.B. 209; 40 L.J. Q.B. 141; 24L. T.130 546 
Bull V. Parker (1843), 2 Dowl. N. S. 345 ; 12 L. J. Q. B. 93 ; 7 Jur. 282. . 48 
Bullen V. Michel (1816), 4 Dowl. 297; 2 Price, 399; 16 R. R. 77.. 430, 431, 

441 
Bulley V. Bulley (1876), L. R. 9 Ch. 739 ; 44 L. J. Ch. 79 ; 30 L. T. 848 ; 

22 "W". R. 779 93 

BuUockt). 'Corrie'(or'Corry) (1878),'3 'q.'b. d'. '366 ;' 47 L. J. Q. B."352"; 

38 L. T. 102 ; 26 "W. R. 330 599, 602 

Buhner v. Norris (1860), K. & G. 321 ; 9 C. B. N. S. 19 ; 30 L. J. C. P. 

25 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 342 ; 3 L. T. 470 ; 9 W. R. 122 683 

Bunbury v. Bunbury (1833), 2 BeaT. 173 ; 8 L. J. Ch. 297 ; 3 Jur. 644 . . 699 

Bunbury ». Matthews (1844), 1 C. & K. 382 147 

Bunn V. Bunn (1864), 4 De G. J. & S. 316 ; 10 L. T. 211 ; 3 N. R. 679 ; 

12 W. R. 561 965 

Bunn V. Markham (1841), 2 Marsh. 532 ; 7 Taunt. 224 ; Holt, 352 ; 17 R. 

R. 497 638 

Bunsby v. Bailly {see Bumaby v. Baillie). 

Bunting's case (1686), 4 Co. Rep. 29 1103 

Burchard v. Macfarlane, (1891) 1 Q. B. 408 ; 60 L. J. Q. B. 687 ; 66 L. T. 

282 ; 39 W. R. 694 856, 857 

BurcheU v. Clark (1876), 2 C. P. D. 88 ; 46 L. J. C. P. 116 ; 36 L. T. 690 ; 

26 W. R. 334 300 

Burchaeld v. Moore (1854), 3 E. & B. 683 ; 2 C. L. R. 1308 ; 22 L. J. Q. B. 

261 ; 18 Jur. 727 1194 

Burder ». O'Neill (1863), 9 Jur. N. S. 1109 ; 9 L. T. 232 632, 884 

Burdick v. Hunt (1873), 43 Ind. 38 616 

Burgess v. Burgess (1817), 2 Hagg. Con. 227 503 

Burgess V. Clements (1815), 4 M. & S. 306 ; Holt, 211, n. ; 1 Stark. 251, n. ; 

16 R. R. 473 162 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. xlv 



PAOE 



Burgees v. Lane (1824), 3 Greenl. 165 494 

Burgess v. Langley (184a), 5 M. & G. 722 ; 1 D. & L. 21 ; 6 Scott, N.'r. 

518 ; 12 L. J. C. P. 257 . 617 

Burgess v. Wiokham (1864), 3 B. & 8. 669 ; 33 L. j. Q. B.'i?" .......... 770 

Burghart «.. Angerstein (1834), 6 C. & P. 690 506, 1170 

Burghart v. Hall (1839), 4 M. & W. 727 ; 8 L. J. Ex. 235 48 

Burgoyne r. Showier (1844), 1 Roberts. 5 697 

Burke v. Moore (1875), 9 Ir. E. Eq. 609 697 

Burleigh v. Stibbs (1793), 5 T. R. 465 300 

Burling v. Paterson, 1792 (should be 1840), 9 C. & P. 570 ']."'!! ! 134 

Burlinson v. Hall (1884), 12 Q. B. D. 347 ; 53 L. J. Q. B. 222 ; 60 L. T. 

723; 32 "W. R. 492 ; 48 J. P. 216 .. 651 

Burls «). Burls (1868), L. R. 1 P. & D. 472 ; 36L. J.P. &M. lis-'feLT. 

677; 15 W. R. 1090 ; 307 

Burmah Trading Corp. Lim. v. Mirza Mahomed Ally, &o.'(1878)' L R. 

5 Ind. App. 130 ...... 686 

Burmester v. Norris (1851), 6 Ex. 796 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 43 ! ! ! ! 160 

Bum V. Boulton (1846), 2 C. B. 476 ; 15 L. J. C. P. 97 714 717 

Burnaby v. Baillie (1889), 42 Ch. D. 282 ; 58 L. J. Ch. 842 : 61 L. T. 634 ; ' 

38W. R. 125 309,621,1054 

Bumby v. Rollitt (1847), 16 M. &W. 644; 17 L. J. Ex. 190; 11 Jur. 827.. 776 

Bumham v. Bennett (1847), 1 De G. & Sm. 513 ; 2 Colly. 260 134 

Burnham v. Webster (1846), 1 Woodb. & M. 176 1145, 1148, 1150, 1155 

Bumside v. Dayrell (1849), 3 Ex. 224 ; 6 RaUw. Cas. 67 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 46.. 541 

Burr's case (18o7), Evidence for Defendant, p. 2 616 619 

BuiT». Harper (1816), Holt, 420; 17 R. R. 656 .'..". !!l220 'l221 

Burrell v. Nicholson 1832), 1 Myl. & K. 680 906 

BurreU v. Nicholson (1833), 1 M. & Rob. 306 ; 6 C. & P. 202 272, 996, 1183 

Burrough v. Martin (1809), 2 Camp. 112 ; 11 R. R. 679 923 925 

Burrows ». Baker (1869), I. R. 3 Eq. 596 711 

Bursill V. Tanner (1885), 16 Q. B. D. 1 ; 55 L. J. Q. B. 53 ; 63 L.' T.'445 ; 

34 W. R. 35 321, 592 698, 609, 610 

Burstall v. Beyfus (1884), 26 Ch. D. 35 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 566 ; 50 L. T. 542 • 

32W. R. 418 Sgg 

Burt, Ex parte (1842), 2 Mont. D. & De G. 666 869 870 

Burt V. Burt (1860), 29 L. J. P. & M. 133 ; 2 S. & T. 88 ; 2 L. T. 439 ■ ' 

8W. R. 552 149 

Burt V. Palmer (1803), 5 Eap. 145 ; 10 R. R. 707, n '.!!.'."'.!!!.' 498 

Burt V. "Walker (1821), 4 B. & Aid. 697 328, 329, 1214, 1216 

Burtenshaw v. Gilbert (17 74), 1 Cowp. 62 708 

Burton and Saddlers' Co., Re (1862), 31 L. J. Q. B. 62 ; 10 W. R.'s?'." ' 994 

Burton ». Ld. Damley (1869). L. R. 8 Eq. 576, n 510 

Burtons. Griffiths (1843), 11 M. & W. 817 38 

Burton v. Issitt (1821), 5 B. & Aid. 267 ...'. 386 

Burton v. Newbery (1875), 1 Ch. D. 234; 45 L. J. Ch. 202; 34 L.'t.'i5"- 

24W.R.388 ' 701 

Burton D. Payne (1827), 2 C. & P. 620 !.'."'.'..'.'.'! 311 

Burton v. Plummer (1834), 4 N. & M. 315 ; 2 A. & E. 341 .'. .'.V.'9'24 'o'ce 927 
Burton v. Reevell (1847), 16 M. & W. 307 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 86 ; 11 Jur. 71 . ' 648 

Bury V. Blogg (1848), 12 Q. B. 877, 882 ; 18 L. J. Q- B. 85 • 15, 192 

Bury V. Oppenheim (1859), 26 Beav. 694 136 

Bush ff. Pox (1856), 6 H. L. Cas. 707 ; 2.t L. J. Ex. 261 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 1029 43 
Bush V. Green (1837), 1 Scott, 289 ; 4 Bing. N. C. 41 ; 3 Hodges, 265 ; 

1 Jur. 844 ; 7 L. J. C. P. 38 227 

Bush V. Martin (1863), 2 H. & C. 311 ; 33 L. J. Ex. 17 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 347- 

9 L. T. N. S. 610 ; 12 W. R. 204 713 

Bushel V. Wheeler (1844), 15 Q. B. 543, n. ; 8 Jur. 532 689 692 

Bushell's case (1670), 6 How. St. Tr. 999, 1008, 1013, 1014 25 

Bussard v. Levering (1821), 6 Wheat. 102 155 

Bussey v. Bamett (1842), 9 M. & W. 312 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 646 ; 11 L. J. Ex 

211 222 

Bustros V. White (1876), 1 Q. B. D. 423 ; 45 L. J. Q. B. 642 ; 34 L T 
865; 24W. R. 721 4,598, 1182, 1187 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



Xlvi TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAQB 

Batcher v. Jarratt (1802), 3 Bos. & P. 146 289, 290, 318 

Butcher v. Nash (1889), 61 L. T. 72 671 

Butcher v. Steuart (1843), 11 M. & W. 857 ; 1 D. & L. 608 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 

391 ; 7 Jur. 774 677 

Butcher's case (1601), Cro. EKz. 821 1019 

Butchers' Co. v. Joues (1794), 1 Eap. 160 910 

Bute V. James (1886), 33 Ch. D. 157 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 668 ; 66 L. T. 133 ; 34 

W. B. 754 363 

Butler V. Allnutt (181 6), 1 Stark. 222 167 

Butler V. Carver (1818), 2 Stark. 433 910 

Butler V. Ford (1833), 1 C. & M. 662 ; 3 Tyr. 677; 2 L. J. Ex. 286 ; M. C. 

109 148 

Butler V. Gale (1866), 27 Vem. 739 741 

Butler V. Moore (1802), MacNally, 263 696 

Butler V. Mountgarret (1859), 7 H. L. Cas. 646, 647 146, 164, 409, 417, 423 

Butler i;. Wright (1829), 2 Wend. 369 454 

Buttemere v. Hayes (1839), 5 M. & W. 456 ; 7 Dowl. 489 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 44 . . 682 
Butterworth, Re {see Ex parte EusseU). 

Butts V. Swart-wood (1823), 2 Cowen, 431 903 

Buxton V. Cornish (1844), 1 Dowl. & L. 585 ; 12 M. & W. 426 ; 13 L. J. 

Ex. 91 286 

Buxton V. North East. Ey. Co. (1869), L. R. 3 Q. B. 549 ; 37 L. J. Q. B. 

258 ; 18 L. T. 795 ; 16 W. R. 1124 ; 9 B. & S. 824 772 

Buxton V. Rust (1872), L. R. 7 Ex. 279 ; 41 L. J. Ex. 173 ; 27 L. T. 210 ; 

20 W. R. 1014 673 

Byamv. Booth (1814), 2 Price, 234, n , 1040 

Byne, Ex parte (1813), 1 V. & B. 320 866 

Byrd, Re (1842), 3 Curt. 117 697 

Byrd V. Nunn (1877), 5 Ch. D. 781 ; 7 Ch. D. 284 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 1 ; 37 

L. T. 585 ; 26 W. R. 101 224 

Byrne v. Boadle (1863), 2 H. & C. 722 ; 33 L. J. Ex. 13 163 

Byrne v. Frere (1828), 2 Moll. 167 327 

Byrne v. Harvey (1838), 2 M. & Roh. 89 314 

Byrom v. Thompson (1839), 3 P. & D. 71 ; 11 A. & E. 31 ; 3 Jur. 1121. .1193, 1196 

Bywater v. Richardson (1834), 3 N. & M. 748 ; 1 A. & B. 608 769 



Caballeeo v. Slater (1854), 14 C. B. 300 ; 23 L. J. C. P. 67 669 

Caddick v. Skidmore (1858), 3 Jur. N. S. 1185 673 682 

Cadge, Re (1868), 37 L. J. P. & M. 16 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 543 ; 17 L. T. 

484 ; 16 W. R. 406 142 

Cadogan, Re, Cadogan «. Palagi (1883), 25 Ch. D. 154; 53 L.J. Ch. 207; 

49 L. T. 666 ; 32 W. R. 57 146 

Oahn Re (1877), 3 Redf. (N. T.) 81 76fi 

Caldbeck v. Boon (1872), 7 Ir. R. C. L. 32 611 

Calder v. Dobell (1871), L. R. 6 C. P. 486 ; 40 L. J. C. P. 224 ; 25 L. T 

129 ; 19 W. R. 409, 978 758 

Calder ». Halket (1839), 3 Moo. P. C. C. 28 1099 

Caldwell v. Hunter (1848), 10 Q. B. 85, 86 " 19 

Caldwell v. Parker (1869), Ir. R. 3 Eq. 619 ] 1194 

Caledonian Ey. Co. f. Sprot (1856), 2 Macq. 449; 1 Paterson, 663 114 

Call V. Dunning (1803), 4 East, 63 ; 5 Esp. 16 1208 

Callaghan v. Pepper (1840), 2 Ir. Eq. R. 399 645 

Callan, Re (1874), Ir. R. 9 Eq. 484 307 

Callans v. Sherry (1832), Alo. & Nap. 126 870 

Galley v. Richards (1864), 19 Beav. 401 600 602 607 

Callow V. Howie (1847), 1 De G. & Sm. 631 ; 17 L. J. Ch. 71 ; 11 Jur. 984. . ' 495 

Cahnady v. Rowe (1848), 6 C. B. 861, 878, 879 112 124 

Calvert ». Bovill (1798), 7 T. R. 523; 4 R. R. 617 1147 1149 

Calvert v. Flower (1836), 7 C. & P. 386 966, 1191 

Calvert v. Scinde Ry. Co. (1866), 18 C. B. N. S. 306 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 245 ; 

13 W. R. 430 819 

The refereneet are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. xlvii 

PAGE 

Calye'B case (1583), 8 Eep. 32a ; 1 Smith, L. C. 132 162 

Calypso, The (1856), Swabey, 28 1122 

Cambrian Mining Co., Ee (1881), 20 Ch. D. 376 ; 61 L. J. Ch. 221 ; 30 

W. E. 283 846 

Cameron's Coalbrook Ey. Co., Ee (1858), 25 Beav. 1 320, 321 

Cameron v. Lightfoot (1777), 2 W. Bl. 1190 551, 872, 873 

Camfield v. Bird (1852), 3 C. & K. 56 244 

Cammell i/. Sewell (1860), 3 H. & N. 646 ; 5 H. & N. 728 ; 29 L. J. Ex. 

350 1101, 1103, 1149 

Camoys, Lord v. Blundell (1848), 1 H. L. Cas. 786 794, 797, 798 

Camoys Peerage (183^), 6 C. & F. 789 424, 425, 426 

Campbell, Ex parts, Cathoart, In re (1870), L. E. 5 Ch. 703 ; 18 W. E. 

1056 592, 610 

Campbells. Att.-Cen. (1867), L. E. 2 Ch. 671 ; 36 L. J. Ch. 600; 15 W. 

E. 916 858 

Campbell v. Campbell (1866), 36 L. J. Ch. 241 ; L. E. 1 Eq. 383 ; 13 L. T. 

667; UW. E. 327; 12Jur. 118 806 

Campbell v. Christie (1817), 2 Stark. 64 1193 

Campbell®. DaJhousie, Earl of (1869), L. E. 1 H. L. Sc. 462 ; 22 L. T. 879 352 

Campbell v. Hodgson (1819), Grow, 74 757 

Campbell v. MoConaghey (1870), L. E. 6 Eq. 20 144 

Campbell v. Riokards (1833), 6 B. & Ad. 840 ; 2 N. & M. 542 933, 934 

CampbeU «>. Twemlo-w (1814), 1 Price, 88 890 

Campbell v. Webster (1845), 2 C. B. 258 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 4 ; 9 Jur. 992 . . 521 

Campion's case (1578), cited 7 Howell, St. Tr. 1205 (E. v. Cellier) 573 

Canada's Appeal (1880), 47 Conn. 450 696 

Canada, West of, OU Co., Ee (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 683 ; 6 Ch. Div. 109 ; 

25 W. E. 787 345, 917 

Canal Bk. v. Bk. of Albany (1841), 1 Hill, N. Y. E. 287 641 

Cann». CUpperton (1839), 10 A. & E. 582 ; 2 P. & D. 560 226 

Cannam v. Farmer (1849), 2 C. & K. 746 ; 3 Ex. 698 271 

Cannan v. Hartley (1850), 9 C. B. 634 ; 19 L. J. C. P. 323 ; 14 Jur. 577. . 660 

Canning's, Eliz., case (1754), 19 How. St. Tr. 632 877 

Cannons. People (1893), 36 Am. St. E. 295 Add. [635] 

Cape Copper Co. v. Comptoir d'Esoompte (1890), 38 W. E. 763 343 

Capital Fire Ins. Assoc, Ee (1883), 24 Ch. U. 408 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 71 ; 32 

W. E. 260 321 

Capron v. Capron (1874), L. E. 17 Eq. 288 ; 43 L. J. Ch. 677 ; 22 W. E. 

347; 29 L. T. 826 139 

CardweU ». Martin (1808), 9 East, 190 ; 1 Camp. 79, 180 1 194, 1203 

Carew v. White (1842), 5 Beav. 172 1184 

Carey v. Adkins (1814), 4 Camp. 92 503 

Carey v. Pitt (1797), Pea. Add. Cas. 130 1221, 1222 

Cargill V. Bower (1878), 10 Ch. D. 602 ; 47 L. J. Oh. 649 ; 38 L. T. 779 ; 

26 W. E. 716 192 

Cariss v. Tattersall (1841), 2 M. & Gr. 890 ; 3 Scott, N. E. 257 1193 

Carlisle, Mayor of v. Blamire (1807), 8 East, 487 ; 9 E. E. 491 300, 552 

Carlisle v. Eady (1824), 1 C. & P. 234 910 

CarUsle v. Whaley (1867), L. E. 2 H. L. 391 ; 16 W. E. 229 738 

Carlos V. Brook (1804), 10 Ves 49 974 

Carmalt v. Post (1837), 8 Watts, 411 930 

Carmarthen, Mayor of v. Lewis (1834), 6 C. & P. 608 190, 643 

Carnarvon, Lord v. ViUebois (1844), 13 M. & W. 313 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 233. . 397, 

405, 406 

Came v. NiohoU (1835), 1 Bing. N. C. 430 ; 1 Scott, 466 443, 444 

Carne ». Steer (1860), 5 H. & N. 628 ; 29 L. J. Ex. 281 626 

Carpenter v. Buller (1841), 8 M. & W. 212 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 393 89, 93, 94 

Carpenter v. Provid. Wash. Ins. Co. (1846), 4 How. Sup. Ct. E. 222 .... 750 

Carpenter v. WaU (1840), 3 P. & D. 457 ; 11 A. & E. 803 254, 969, 973 

Carpenters' Co. v. Hayward (1780), 1 Dougl. 374 2 

Carpmael ii.Powis (1846-6), 1 Ph. 687; 16 L. J. Ch. 275 592, 593, 699 

Cairv. Bnrdiss(1835), 1 C. M. &E. 782; 6Tyr.309; 4 L. J. Ex. 60.. 1211, 1212 

Yol. I. ends with page 635, 



xlviii TABLE OP CASES CITED. 

PAGB 
Carr v. Griffith {see Ee Griffith). 

Carr v. Jackson (1852), 21 L. J. Ex. 137 ; 7 Ex. 382 759 

Carr v. Lond. & N. W. Ry. Co. (1875), L. R. 10 C. P. 307 ; 44 L. J. C. P. 

109; 31L. T. 785; 23 W. R. 747 648 

Carr v. Mead (1858), 12 Gray, 166 616 

Carr v. Montefiore (1864), 6 B. & S. 408 ; 33 L. J. Q. B. 256 741 

Carr v. Mostyn (1860), 5 Ex. 69 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 249 397, 510, 1169 

Carrier Dove, The (1863), B. & L. 113 ; 2 Moore, P. C. C. (N. S.) 261 ... . 178 

Oarrigy v. Brook (1871), 6 Ir. R. 0. L. 501 730 

Carrington v. Comock (1829), 2 Sim. 567 327 

Carrington v. Jonea (1824), 2 Sim. & St. 136, 140 447 

Carrington v. Roots (1837), 2 M. & W. 248 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 95 687 

Carroll v. Co-weU (1838), 1 Jehh & Sy. 43 670 

Carroll v. The State (1893), 40 Am. St. R. 786 Add. [968] 

Carruthera v. Graham (1841), 9 Dowl. 947 ; 10 L. J. Q. B. 364 328, 349 

Carskadden v. Poorman (1840), 10 Watts, 82 422 

Carstaira v. Stewart (1734), Morison's Presumptiona, XVI 170 

Carter v. Boehm (1766), 1 W. Bl. 593 ; 3 Burr. 1905 931, 933, 934 

Carter v. Carter (1858), 27 L. J. Ch. 74, 84, 85 ; 3 K. & J. 618 ; 4 Jur. 

• N. S. 63 94 

Carter f. Leeds Daily Newa (1876), W. N. 1876, at p. 11 963 

Carter v. Ld. Coleraine (1740), cited 2 BaU & B. 384 ; Barnard. Ch. R. 126.. 482 

Carter v. Downiah (1658), Garth. 83 5 

Carter v. James (1844), 13 M. & W. 137 ; 2 Dowl. &L. 236 ; 13 L. J. Ex. 

373; 8 Jur. 912 532, 534, 1132 

Carter v. Jones (1833), 1 M. & Rob. 281 271 

Carter v. Muroot (1768), 4 Burr. 2163 Ill 

Carter v. Pryke (1791), Peake, 95 230 

Carter v. Tousaaint (1822), 1 Dowl. & R. 515 ; 6 B. & A. 855 689, 690 

Carter v. White (1882), 20 Ch. D. 226 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 465 ; 46 L. T. 236 ; 

30 W. R. 466 1205 

Carter and Croat's oaae (1585), Godb. 33 1161 

Cartwright v. Cartwright (1878), 26 W. R. 684 938 

Cartwright v. Green (1803), 2 Leach, C. C. 952 ; 8 Ves. 405 ; 7 R. R. 99. .<592, 960 

Carver, Re (1842), 3 Curt. 29 698 

Carver J). Jacfoon (1830), 4 Pet. 83 88, 509 

Cary v. Gerrish (1801), 4 Esp. 9 154 

Case V. Reeve (1817), 14 Johns. 81 1112 

Casement v. Fulton (1845), 5 Moore, P. C. C. 140 ; 3 Moore, Im.App. 395 . . 693, 694 

Caahill v. Wright (1866), 6 E. & B 891 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 1072 162 

Casmore, Re (1869), L. R. 1 P. 653 ; 38 L. J. P. 64 ; 20 L. T. N. S. 497 ; 

17 W. R. 627 699 

Cassidy v. Firman (1867), Ir. R. 1 C. L. 8 712 

Caaaidy v. Steuart (1841), 2 Scott, N. R. 432 ; 2 M. & Gr. 437 ; 9 Dowl. 

P. C. 366; 6 Jur. 25 4 

Casson v. Churohley (1884), 53 L. J. Q. B. 335 ; 50 L. T. 568 731 

Casson v. O'Brien (1842), Arm. M. & O. 263 977 

Caatt). Poyaer(1856), 2Sm. &G. 369; 3Jur.N.S. 38; 26L. J. Ch. 93, 353 831 
Caatle v. Downton (1879), 5 C. P. D. 56 ; 49 L. J. C. P. 6 ; 41 L. T. 528 ; 

28 W. R. 257 736 

Caatle v. Fox (1871), L. R. 11 Eq. 542 ; 40 L. J. Ch. 302 ; 24 L. T. 536 ; 

19 W. R. 840 784, 786 

Caatle ». Sworder (1861), 6 H. & N. 828 ; 30 L. J. Ex. 310 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 

233 ; 4 L. T. 865 ; 9 W. E. 697 690 

Caatlebar Guard. *. Ld. Luoau (1849), 13 Ir. L. R. 44 1173 

Castleden v. Castleden (1861), 9 H. L. C. 186 ; 4 Macq. 159 ; 31 L. J. Mat. 

103 ; 5 L. T. 164 129 

Castrique v. Imrie (1860), 8 C. B. N. S. 405 ; SOL. J. Q. B. 163 ; 30 L. J. 

C. P. 177; 4L. T. 143; 9 W. R. 455 1103 

Castrique v. Imrie (1869), 39 L. J. C. P. 350 ; L. E. 4 H. of L. 414 ; 23 

L. T. 48; 19 W. E. 1 1103, 1147 

Gates V. Hardacre (1811), 3 Taun. 424 ; 12 E. E. 678 962 

Cates:). Winter (1789), 3 T. R. 306 310, 312 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED, xlix 

PAdB 

Catherina Maria, The (1866), L. R. I Adm. 63 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 380 1049 

Catherwood v. Caslon (1844), 13 M. & W. 261, 265 ; 13 L. J. Ex. 433 ; 

8 Jur. 1076 149 

Catling V. Skoulding (1795), 6 T. R. 189 716 

Catling V. King (1877), 6 Ch. D. 660 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 384 ; 36 L. T. 526 ; 25 

W. R. 550 671 

Caton V. Caton (1849), 7 Notes of Cas. (Eoc. & Mar.) 28 185, 503 

Catoni!. Caton (1867), L. R. 2 H. L. U7; 36 L. J. Ch. 886 ; 16 W. R. 1..674, 

679, 680 

Caton V. Hamilton (1889), 53 J. P. 504 1168 

Caton V. Lenox (1827), 5 Rand. 31, 36 354 

Catt V. Howard (1820), 3 Stark. 3 483, 494, 926 

Cattell». Ireson (1858), E. B. & E. 91 ; 27 L. J. M. C. 167 ; 1 Jnr. N. S. 

560 884 

Catton V. Simpson (1855), 8 A. & E. 136 ; 3 N. & P. 248 1194 

Cattrall, Re (1863), 3 S. & T. 419 ; 33 L. J. P. 106 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 136 . . 141 

Caunoe v. Spanton (1844), 7 M. & Ur. 903 152 

Cavau V. Stewart (1 816), 1 Stark. 525 1147 

Cave V. Hastings (1881), 7 Q. B. D. 125 ; 50 L. J. Q. B. 576 ; 45 L. T. 

348 ; 46 J. P. 56 672, 673 

Cave V. Mackenzie (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 564 ; 37 L. T. 218 729 

Cave V. Mills (1862), 7 H. & N. 913 ; 31 L. J. Ex. 265 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 363 ; 

6 L. T. 650 642 

Cave V. Mountain (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 260 ; 1 Scott, N. R. 132 ; 9 L. J. 

M. C. 90 36, 1100 

Oawley v. Furnell (1852), 12 C. B. 291 ; 20 L. J. C. P. 197 ; 16 Jur. 908. . 712 
Cawthome v. Cordrey (1863), 13 C. B. N. S. 406 ; 32 L. J. C. P. 152 ... . 681 

Cazenove v. Vaughan (1813), 1 M. & Sel. 4 ; 14 R. R. 377 325 

Central News Co. v. East. News Tel. Co. (1884), 53 L. J. Q. B. 236 ; 60 

L. T. 235; 32W. R. 493 346,855 

Chabbook's case (1804), 1 Mass. 144 562 

Chad V. Tilsed (1821), 2 B. & B. 403 ; 5 Moore (C. P.), 185 791 

Chadwick v. Chadwiok (1863), L. R. 8 Ch. 926 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 805 ; 29 L. T. 

284 961, 970 

Chadwick v. City of Dub. St. Pack. Co. (1856), 6 El. & Bl. 771 ; 3 Jur. 

N. S. 207 6 

Chadwick v. Turner (1866), 34 Beav. 634 ; 34 L. J. Ch. 366 ; 35 L. J. Ch. 

349; 11 Jur. N. S. 333 738 

Chalmers v. Shaokell (1834), 6 C. & P. 475 105 

Chamberlain ». King {or King v. Chamberlain) (1871), L. R. 6 C. P. 474 ; 

40 L. J. C. P. 273 ; 24 L. T. N. S. 736 ; 19 W. R. 931 226 

Chamberlain v. Stoneham (1889), 61 L. T. 560 ; 38 W. R. 107 817 

Chambers v. Bemasconi (1831), 1 C. M. & R. 347 ; 4 Tyr. 531 ; 3 L. J. 

Ex. 373 444, 4.58 

Chambers v. Kelly (1873), 7 Ir. C. L. R. 231 784 

Chambers V. Mason (1858), 5 C. B. N. S. 59 ; 28 L. J. C. P. 10; 4 Jur. N. 

S. 1037 607 

Chambers v. "Wood (1848), 2 Notes of Cases (Eoc. & Mar.), 485 140 

Chamley*. Lord Dunsany (1807), 2 Sch. & Lef . 718 1123 

Chamney, Re (1849), 7 Notes of Cases (Ecc. & Mar.), 70 699 

Champian v. Atkinson (1672), 3 Keb. 90 232 

Champion v. Plummer (1805), 1 Bos. & P. N. R. 262 ; 5 Esp. 240 ; 8 Rev. 

R. 795 671 

Champion v. Terry (1822), 3 B. & B. 295 ; 7 Moore, C. P. 130 307 

Champneys v. Peck (1816), 1 Stark. 404 157, 464 

Chandler v. Grieves (1812), 2 H. Bl. 606, n. ; 6 T. R. 325, n. ; 3 R. R. 625. . 4, 21 

Chandler v. Home (1842), 2 M. & Rob. 423 918 

Chandler v. Howell (1877), 4 Ch. D. 651 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 25 ; 35 L. T. 692 ; 

25 W. R. 55 684 

Chandos, Marquis of, v. Corns, of Inl. Rev. (1851), 6 Ex. 464 ; 20 L. J. 

Ex. 269 ; 2 L. M. & P. 311 277 

Chandos Peerage (1791), Pari. Min. 27 423, 424, 425, 426, 427 

Chant V. Brown (1851-2), 9 Hare, 790 692, 699, 603 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



1 TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

TAOB 

Chanter e. HopMns (1838), 4 M. & "W. 399 ; 1 H. & H. 377 ; 3 Jur. 58 . . 777 

Chapel V. Hioks (1833), 2 0. & M. 214 ; 4 Tyr. 43 ; 3 L. J. Ex. 38 223 

ChapHn v. Levy (1854), 2 C. L. R. 566 ; 9 Ex. 531 ; 23 L. J. Ex. 117. .318, 476 

Chaplin v. Rogers (1800), 1 East, 192 ; 6 R. R. 249 691 

'Chapman, Re, Ex parte Johnson (1884), 26 Ch. D. 338 ; 53 L. J. Ch. 763 ; 

60 L. T. 214 ; 32 W. R. 693 129 

Chapman ». Beard (1797), 2 Anst. 942; 4 R. R. 875 521 

Chapman ». Callis (1861), 9 0. B. N. S. 769 ; 30 L. J. C. P. 241 ; 3 L. T. 

890; 9W. R. 375; 7 Jur. N. S. 995 661 

Chapman v. Chapman (1817), 2 Conn. 347 41^ 

Chapman v. Coffin (1860), 14 Gray, 464 954 

Chapman v. Cowlan (1810), 13 East, 10 ; 12 R. R. 294 395 

Chapman v. Dayis (1841), 1 Dowl. N. S. 239 ; 4 Scott, N. R. 319 ; 3 M. & 

Gr. 609 817, 832 

Chapman^. Emden(1841), 9 0. &P. 717 272 

Chapman v. Keane (1835), 3 A. & E. 193 : 4 N. & M. 607 32 

Chapman v. Monm. Ry. & Can. Co. (1857), 2 H. & N. 267 ; 27 L. J. 

Ex. 97 1102 

Chapman v. Rawson (1845), 8 Q. B. 673 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 225 271 

Chapman v. Searle (1825), 3 Pick. 38, 44 544 

Chapman v. Speller (1850), 14 Q. B. 621 ; 19 L. J. Q. B. 239 ; 14 Jur. 652. 775 

Chapman v. Walton (1833), 10 Bing. 57 ; 3 M. & Scott, 389 934 

Chappell V. Purday (1845), 14 M. & W. 303 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 258 1036 

Chappie V. Cooper (1844), 13 M. & W. 252 ; 13 L. J. Ex. 286 49 

Charkieh, The(1878), 42L. J.Adm. 17; L. R. 4 A. & E. 69; 28L.T. 513.. 21 

Charlotta, The (1814), 1 Dods. Adm. 392 79 

Charlter v. Barret (1790), Peake, 32 244 

Charlton v. Coomhes (1868), 32 L. J. Oh. 284 ; 4 Giff. 372; 8 L. T. 81 ; 

11 W. R. 604 ; 1 New R. 547 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 634 592, 603, 605 

Charlton «. Hindmarsh (1861), 1 S. & T. 519 ; 8 W. R. 269 ; 8 H. L. Cas. 

160 695, 700 

Charlton v. "Watton (1834), 6 0. & P. 385 '. 245 

Ohamley v. Grundy (1854), 14 0. B. 608 ; 2 0. L. R. 822 ; 23 L. J. 0. P. 

121 ; 18 Jur. 653 307 

Charnook v. Dewings (1853), 3 0. & K. 378 918 

Charter*. Charter (1874), L. R. 2 P. 315; 4lL. J. P. 10; 20 W. R. 212. .792, 798 

Chart. Mer. Bank of India i>. Dickon (1871), L. R, 3 P. 0. 574 38 

Chase v. Lincoln (1807), 3 Mass. 237 931 

Ohasemore v. Richards (1859), 7 H. L. Cas. 349 ; 29 L. J. Ex. 81 ; 5 Jur. 

N. S. 873 ; 7 W. R. 685 125 

Chasemore v. Turner (1876), L. R. 10 Q. B. 500 ; 46 L. J. Q. B. 66 ; 33 

L. T. 323 ; 24 "W. R. 70 711 

Chatelaine. Pontigny (1859), 1 S. & T. 411 1132 

Chater v. Beckett (1797), 7 T. R. 201 ; 4 R. R. 418 678 

Ohatfield v. Fryer (1815), 1 Price, 263 401 

Chatland v. Thornley (1810), 12 East, 544 19 

Chaurand ». Angerstein (1791), Pea. 43 764 

Cheese v. Lovejoy, Re Harris (1877), L. R. 2 P. D. 161 ; 25 W. R. 453 . . 705, 

706, 1231 
Cheesebrough, Re (1871), L. R. 12 Eq. 358 ; 40 L. J. Bauk. 79 ; 26 L. T, 

76 ; 19 W. R. 973 82 

Cheesmau i). Exall (1861), 6 Ex. 341 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 209 646 

Cheltenham and Gt. West Union Ry. Co. v. Daniel (1841), 2 Q. B. 281, 

292 ; 2 Railw. Cas. 728 641 

Chemical Electric Light, &o. Co. v. Howard (1890), 160 Mass. 496 741 

Cheney v. Oourtois (1863), 13 C. B. N. S. 634; 32 L. J. 0. P. 116; 9 Jur. 

N. S. 1057; 7 L. T. 680 129, 916 

Chennell, In re, Jones r. Chennell (1877), 8 Ch. D. 492 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 80 ; 

38 L. T. 494 ; 26 W. R. 596 1233 

Cherry v. Colonial Bk. of Australasia (1869), 38 L. J. P. .0. 49 ; 21 L. T. 

356; 17 W. R. 1031 781 

Cherry «. Heming (1849), 4 Ex. 19; 19 L. J. Ex. 63 136, 654, 667, 680 

Cheslyn v. Dalby (1846), 4 T. & C. Ex. R. 238 713 

The references art to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OP CASES CITED. H 

PAQE 

Cheater v. 'Wortley (1856), 18 0. B. 239 960 

Chesterton v. Parlar (1838), 7 A. & E. 713 ; 3 N. & P. 15 ; 1 W. W. & H. 

19 ; 2 Jut. 394 132 

Chetwynd v. Lindon (1752), 2 Ves. sen. 450 960 

Chichester v. M. of Donegal (1870), 39 L. J. Ch. 694 ; 5 L. R. Ch. 497 ; 22 

L. T. 458 ; 18 W. R. 531 321, 597 

Chichester, Ld. Jn., v. Coventry (1867), 36 L. J. Ch. 673 ; L. R. 2 H. L. 

71 ; 16 W. R. 849 806 

Chifferiel v. Watson (1889), 68 L. J". Ch. 137 ; 68 L. T. 877 ; 36 W. R. 806. 912 

Child V. Grace (1825), 2 C. & P. 193 527, 528 

Childerston v. Barrett (1809), 1 1 East, 439 866 

China St. Ship Co. v. Com. Ass. Co. (1881), 8 Q. B. D. 142 ; 51 L. J. Q. B. 

132; 45L. T. 641; 30 W. R. 224 1180 

Chinnock v. Ly. Ely (1866), 2 H. & M. 220 ; 4 De G. J. & S. 638 ; 34 L. J. 

Ch. 399 673 

Chipp V. Harris (1839), 5 M. & W. 430 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 64 734 

Chipperfield «). Carter (1896), 72 L. T. 487 Add. [673] 

Chirac v. Reinioker (1826), 11 "Wheat. 280, 295 610 

Chieman v. Count (1841), 2 M. & G. 317 ; 2 Scott, N. R. 569 ; 10 L. J. C. P. 

124 525 

Chitty V. Dendy (1835), 3 A. & E. 324 ; 4 N. & M. 842 ; 1 H. & W. 169 . . 20 

Chodwiok v. Palmer (1851), unreported 694 

Cholmondeley, Ld. v. Ld. Clinton (1815), 19 Ves. 268; 2 Ves. & B. 113; 

G. Coop. 80 ; 13 R. R. 183 ; 14 R. R. 219 603 

Chri8tian,Re(1849),2Rob.Eco.Rep.llO; 7Notesof Cas. (Eco. & Mar.) 265 700 

Christian v. Coombe (1796), 2 Eap. 489 552 

Christie v. Richardson (1842), 10 M. & W. 688 ; 2 D. N. S. 503 ; 12 L. J. 

Ex. 86 ; 6 Jur. 1069 1073 

Christie v. Vuwin (1840), 3 P. &D. 204; 11 A. &E. 373 ; 4 Jur. 363. . 131, 132, 1137 
Christmas v. Whinyates (1863), 32 L. J. P. & M. 73 ; 3 S. & T. 81 ; 9 Jur. 

N. S. 283 ; 8 L. T. 801 ; 11 "W. R. 371 142 

Chubb V. Solomons (1852), 3 C. & K. 75 617 

Church i>. Imp. Gas Light and Coke Co. (1838), 6 A. & E. 846 ; 3 N. & P. 

35; 1 W. W. &H. 137 639, 640, 641,' 642, 644 

Churchward v. Palmer (1856), 10 Moo. P. C. C. 472 6 

Churton v. Erewen (1866), 2 Dr. & Sm. 390 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 660 ; 12 L. T. 

105 ; 13 W. R. 490 599 

Churton v. Frewen (1877, should be 1867), 36 L. J. Ch. 660 ; 15 W. R. 569; 

16 L. T. 171 818 

Chute?;. Busteed (1862-3), 15 Ir. Law R. N. S. 115 654 

Ciocoif. Ciocci (1860), 29 L. J. P. & M. 60 1119 

City of Berne «. Bk. of England (1804), 9 Ves. 347 ; 7 R. R. 218 3 

City of Bristol v. Wait (1834), 6 C. & P. 691 303 

City of Cambridge, Re, Wood v. Smith (1874), 43 L. J. Adm. 11 ; 5 L. R. 

P. C. 461 ; 30 L. T. 439 ; 22 W. R. 678 .' 178 

City of London v. Clerke (1690), Carth. 181 397 

City of London v. Perkins (1734), 3 Bro. P. C. 602 327 

City of London Gas Light and Coke Co. v. NichoUs (1823), 2 C. & P. 365.. 641 

atyof ]U:eooa(1880), 5P.D.28; 49 L.J. P. 17; 41L. T.444; 28W. R. 260 1103 

Clagetti). Phillips (1842), 2 T. & C. Ch. 82 601 

Clan Gordon, The (1882), 7 P. Div. 190 ; 4 Asp. M. C. 613 ; 46 L. T. 490; 

30 W. R. 691 178 

aanmorris, Ld. v. Mullen (1837), C. & D. Abr. Cas. 8 1214 

Clapham v. Cologan (1813), 3 Camp. 382 1195 

Clapham v. Langton (1865), 34 L. J. Q. B. 46 ; 5 B. & S. 729 ; 10 L. T. 

875; 12 W. R. 1011 770 

Clarapede v. Commercial Union Assoc, (1893) 32 W. R. 262 188 

Clarges v. Sherwin (1698-9), 12 Mod. 343 1097 

Claridge v. Hoare (1807), 14 Ves. 69 961 

Claridge v. Mackenzie (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 143 ; 4 Scott, N. R. 726 98, 99 

Claridge v. South Staffordshire Ry. Co., (1892) 1 Q. B. 422 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 

603 ; 66 L. T. 666 ; 66 J. P. 408 117 

Vol. !■ tnds with page 635. 



lii TABLE OP CASES CITED. 

FAOB 

Clark's Ex. v. Van Keimsdyk (1815), 9 Cranch, 153 495, 627 

Clark, Ke (1842), 2Q. B. 630; 2G. &D. 780; 11 L. J. Q. B. 75 132 

Clark V. Adie (1877), 2 App. Gas. 423 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 598 ; 37 L. T. 1 ; 26 

W. R. 45 644 

Clark V. Alexander (1844), 8 Scott, N. R. 161 ; 13 L. J. C. P. 133 ; 8 Jur. 

496 169, 387, 716 

Clark V. Big-elow (1839), 4 Shepl. 246 930 

Clark V. Clark a830), 1 M. & Rob. 3 593 

Clark V. Gifford (1833), 10 Wend. 310 748 

Clark V. Hooper (1834), 10 Bing. 481 ; 3 L. J. C. P. 159 ; 4 M. & So. 

353 713 

Clark V. Hougham (1823), 2 B. & C. 149 ; 3 Dowl. & R. 322 219 

Clark V. Leach (1863), 32 L. J. Ch. 290 ; 1 De G. J. & S. 409 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 

610 ; 32 Beav. 14 169 

Clark V. Molynenx (1876), 14 Cox, C. C. 10 ; 47 L. J. Q. B. 230 ; 3 Q. B. 

D. 237 ; 37 L. T. 694 ; 26 "W. R. 104 Ill 

Clark V. Mullick (1340), 3 Moo. P. C. C. 279 51, 52 

Clark V. Vorce (1836), 15 Wend. 193 927 

Clark V. Waite (1815), 12 Mass. 439 514 

Clark V. Wilmot (1841), 1 T. & C. C. C. 53 437 

Clark f. Wray (1886), 31 Ch. D. 68; 55 L. J. Ch. 119; 63L.T.485; 34 

W. R. 69 192 

Clarki). Wright (18C0), 11 Ir. C. L.R. 402 48 

Clark V. York (1882), 47 L. T. 381 ; 31 W. R. 62 192 

Clarke, Ex parte (1832), 2 Dea. & C. 99 8B6, 869, 870 

Clarke, Re (1842), 2 Q.B. 630 ; llL. J. Q. B. 75; 2 G. &D. 780. .132, 1100,1136 

Clarke, Re (1839), 2 Curt. 329 701 

Clarke, Re (1858), 1 S. & T. 22 ; 27 L. J. P. & M. 18 700 

Clarke v. Bradlaugh (1881), 8 Q. B. D. 63 ; 51 L. J. Q. B. 1 ; 46 L. T. 

49 ; 30 W. R. 53 ; 46 J. P. 278, affg. 7 Q. B. D. 151 84 

Clarke v. Callow (1876), 46 L. J. Q. B. 53 224 

Clarke V. Clarke (1806), 6 Esp. 61 542 

Clarke ». Clarke (1868) I. R. 2 C. L. 396 700 

Clarke v. Clarke (1879), 3 L. R. &. 306 700 

Clarke v. Courtney (1831), 5 Pet. 319, 344 429 

Clarke v. Cuckfield Union (1851-2), 1 Bail Ct. C. 81 (Lowndes, M. & P.) ; 

21 L. J. Q. B. 349 ; 16 Jur. 686 641, 644 

Clarke v. Dickson (1868), 6 C. B. N. S. 453 ; 28 L. J. C. P. 225 ; 6 Jur. 

N. S. 1027 '. 746 

Clarke v. Fuller (1864), 16 C. B. N. S. 24 ; 12 W. R. 671 673 

Clarke «. Hall (1888), 24 L. R. Ir. 316 93 

Clarke v. Roche (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 372 ; 25 W. R. 309 281 

Clarke v. Roystone (1846), 13 M. & W. 752 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 143 781 

Clarke v. Satfery (1824), Ry. & M. 126 921 

Clarke v. Scripps (1852), 2 Roberts. 568 706 

Clarkson v. Clarkson (1862), 2 S. & T. 497 ; 31 L. J. P. 143 ; 6 L. T. 606 ; 

10 W. R. 781 703 

Clarkson v. Woodhouae (1782), 6 T. E. 412, n. ; 3 Doug. 189 301, 433 

Clary v. Clary (1841), 2 Iredell, 78 931 

Clay's case (1784), 2 East, P. C. 680 148 

Clay V. Crowe (1853), 8 Ex. 295 ; 9 Ex. 604 308 

Clay ». Stephenson (1837), 3 A. & E. 807 ; 6 N. & M. 318 347 

Clay j;. Thackrah (1839), 9 C. & P. 53 ; 2 M. & Rob. 244 475 

Clay V. Yates (1856), 25 L. J. Ex. 237 ; 1 H. & N. 73 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 908.. 688 

Claytons. Blakey (1798), 8 T. R. 3 ; 4 Rev. R. 575 6.54 

Clayton v. Gregson (1836), 6 A. & E. 302 ; 6 N. & M. 694 763 

Clayton v. Ld. Nugent (1844), 13 M. & W. 205 744, 784, 795, 796 

Cieare v. Oleare (1869), L. R. 1 P. & D. 655 ; 38 L. J. P. & M. 31 ; 

20 L. T. 497 ; 17 W. R. 687 140 

Cleave v. Jones (1862), 7 Ex. 421 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 105 26, 27, 600, 717 

Cleggv. Levy (1812), 3 Camp. 166 936 

Clemenshaw ». Corp. of Dublin (1876), 10 Ir. R. C. L. 1 645 

The references are topazes, not to paragraphi. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. liii 

Clement's case (1868), 37 L. J. Oh. 296 ; L. R. 13 Eq. 179 ; 18 L. T. 59C. . 845 

Clement, Ex parte (1822), 11 Price, 68 920 

Clementi v. Golding (1809), 2 Camp. 25 ; 11 Bast, 244 16, 20 

Clendon v. Dinneford (1831), 5 0. & P. 18 ; 3 Stark. Ev. 1160 13, 152 

Clergy Society, Re (1856), 2 E. & J. 615 760 

Clerk V. Molineux (1664), T. Ray. 100 ; 1 Lev. 159 ; 1 Sid. 268 ;' 1 Keb.' 845 871 

Cleve V. Powel (1832), 1 M. & Rob. 228 602 1119 

Cleveland, Duch. Dow. of, v. Meyrick (1868), 37 L. J. Ch. 125 ; 17 L. T.' 

238 KQ 

Clifford o. Burton (1823), 1 Bing. 199r8'Moore',C.' P.'ie".'.' .'.'.'.*.".'.'.' .'.390, 504 

Clifford V. Hunter (1827), 3 C. & P. 16 ; M. & M. 103 48, 942 

Clifford V. Parker (1841), 2 M. & Gr. 909 ; 3 Scott, N. R. 233 ; 10 L. J. 

^9-^;^^'^ 1192, 1193 

Clifford V. Turrell (1841), 1 Y. & C. C. C. 138; 9 Jur. 633; 14 L. J. Ch. 



390 



748 



Clifton V. U. S. (1846), 4 How. S. Ct. R. 242 109, 277, 520 

Clinau V. Cooke (1802), 1 Soh. & Lef. 41 ; 9 R. R. 3 679, 688, 760 

CUne's case (1870), L. R. 18 Eq. 213 ; 22 W. R, 512 ; 30 L. T. 249 139 

Clive V. Carew (1859), IJ. & H. 199, 207 ; 28 L. J. Ch. 685 ; 5 Jur. N. S.487. . 495 

Clogstown V. Walcot (1847), 5 Notes of Cases (Ecc. & Mar.), 523 143 

Cloncurry, Ld., case of (18 1 1), Maoq. H. of L. Practice, 606 602 

Close, Ex parte (Ex parte. Kirk, Re Bennett) (1877), 46 L. J. Bk. 1 ; 36 

L. T. 429; 26W.R. 604; 6Ch, D. 145......... 847 

Closmadeuc v. Carrel (1856), 18 C. B. 36 ; 25 L. J. C. P. 216 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 

474 J33 

Clothiers. Chapman (1806), 14 East,' 331;' iVR.'R.'sis.'.' .'.".','.'.".".'.".*.'.".".' 398 

Clowes V. Higginson (1813), 1 Ves. & B. 375 ; 12 R. R. 284 750 

Clowes4;.Hmiard(1876),4Ch. D. 413; 46L. J.Ch. 271; 25 W. R. 224. .187, 192 

Clunnes v. Pezzey (1807), 1 Camp. 8 108 

Clyde Nav. Co. v. Barclay (1876), 1 App. Cas. 790 ; 36 L. T. 379 ........ 178 

Coal Consuming Gas Co., Re, Ex parte Gover (1876), 45 L. J. Ch. 95 ; 

1 Ch. D. 182 ; 33 L. T. 619 ; 24 W. R. 125 1233 

Coates V. Bainbridge (1828), 5 Bing. 58 ; 2 M. & P. 142 388 

Coates V. Birch (1841), 2 Q. B. 262 ; 1 G. & D. 647 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 540 "; 

6 Jur. 540 g()9 

Coats V. Chaplin (1842), 3 Q. B. 486 ; 11 L. J.'q.'b'. '315 ;' 2 G.'&'i)'.'652'; 

6 Jur. 1123 670, 692 

Cobbett, Ex parte (1858), 4 Jur. N. S. 145 837, 869 870 

Cobbett V. Grey (1819), 4 Ex. 729 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 137 ; 1 L. M. & P. S83. . 479 
Cobbett ». Hudson (1862), 22 L. J. Q. B. 11 ; 1 E. & B. 11; 17 Jur. 

^^88 909 918 

Cobbett V. Kilminster (I860), 4 E. & P. 490 1224 1225 

Cobbold V. Oaston (1824), 1 Bing. 399 ; 1 C. & P. 51 ;' 's 'Moore '('c'.'p.) 456 688 

Cobden v. Kendrick (1791), 4 T. R. 431 ; 2 R. R. 424 607 610 

Cochran v. Retberg (1800), 3 Esp. 121 763 

Cochrane v. Moore (1890), 25 Q. B. D. 57 ; 59 L. J. Q. B. '377 ; 63 L "t 

153 ; 38 W. R. 588 ; 64 J. P. 804 639 

Cockv. Gent (1843), 12 M. & W. 234; 13 L. J. Ex. 24 ; 1 D. '& 'l. 

413 227 228 

Cockayne, Re (185(i), Deane, Ecc. R. 177 !!!.'!."!" 705' 708 

Cooking V. Ward (1»45), 1 C. B. 858 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 245 682 

Cookrill «. Sparkes (1862), 32 L. J. Ex. 118 ; 1 H. & C. 699 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 

307 ; 7 L. T. 752 490 

Cocks V. Nash (1833), 6 0. & P. 164 597 

Cooks V. Purday (1846), 2 C. & K. 269 .'!..!!!!.'.'!! 936 

Coe V. Clay (1829), 5 Bing. 440 ; 3 M. & P. 57 773 

Coggs V. Bernard (1704), 2 Ld. Raym. 918 ; 1 Smith, L. 0. 201 161, 162 

Cohen v. Davidson (1877), 46 L. J. Q. B. 305 ; 2 Q. B. D. 455; 36 L. T 

244; 26W. R. 369 771 

Cohen v. Hinkley (1809), 2 Camp. 61 ; 1 Tauu. 249 ; 11 R. R. 660 176 

Cohen v. Templar (1817), 2 Stark. 260 598 

Cohn V. Davidson {see Cohen v. Davidson) . 

Coit V. Tracy (1830), 8 Conn. 268 386 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



liv TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOB 

Colbern's case (1823), 1 Wheel. C. C. 479 891 

Colbourn v. Dawson (1851), 10 C. B. 765 ; 20 L. J. C. P. 154 ; 16 Jur. 

680 786 

Colclough V. Smyth (1860), 15 Ir. Ch. R. 347 ; 10 L. T. 918 798 

Cole V. Hadley (1840), 11 A. & B. 807 ; 4 Jur. 483 ; 3 P. & D. 458 500 

Cole V. Hawkins (1738), Andr. 275 ; 2 Str. 1094 873 

Cole V. Manning (1877), 46 L. J. M. C. 175 ; 2 Q. B. D. 611 ; 35 L. T. 

941 631 

Cole?;. Sherard(1855), 11 Ex. 482 ; 25 L. J. Ex. 59 9 

Coleman's case (1 748) , cited in Joy on Confession 655 

Coleman v. Gibson (1832), 1 M. & Rob. 168 692 

Coleman v. Southwiok (1812), 9 Johns. 45 372 

Coles f. Bk. of England (1839), 10 A. & E. 437 : 2 P. & D. 521 542 

Coles V. Bristowe (1868), L. R. 4 Ch. App. 3 ; 38 L. J. Ch. 81 ; 19 L. T. 

403 ; 17 W. R. 106 158 

Coles V. Coles and Brown (1866), 35 L. J. P. & M. 40 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 

70 989 

CoUard v. Sampson (1853), 16 Beav. 543 ; 4 De G. M. & G. 224 ; 17 Jur. 

641 ; 22 L. J. Ch. 729 ; 1 Eq. Kep. 262 693 

CoUedge v. Horn (1825), 3 Bing 119 ; 10 Moore (J B.) 431 507, 711 

CoUen V. Wright (1857), 26 L. J. Q. B. 147 ; 7 E. & B. 301 ; 27 L. J. Q. 

B. 216; 8E. &B. 647; 3 Jur. N. S. 363 780 

CoUetti;. CoUett (1838), 1 Curt. 687 931, 934 

Collett V. Hubbard (1846), 2 Coop. 94, 99 544 

CuUett f. Ld. Keith (1803), 4 Esp. 212 517, 1144 

CoUette V. Goode (1877), 7 Ch. D. 842; 47 L. J. Ch. 370 ; 38 L. T. 504 . . 224 
Collier, Ex parte {see Ex parte Bailey). 

Colliers. Nokes (1849), 2 C. & Kir. 1012 16, 960 

CoUier». Simpson (1831), 5 C. & P. 74 936, 936 

CoUingi;. Treweek (1827), 6 B. & C. 398 300, 316, 317 

Collins ». Barrow (1831), 1 M. & Rob. 112 774 

Collins V. Bayntun (1841), 1 Q. B. 117 ; 4 P. &D. 644 ; 5 Jur. 630 1211 

Collins V. Bishop (1879), 48 L. J. Ch. 31 149, 373 

ColUnsf. Blantem (1767), 2 Wils. 341 ; 1 Sm. L. C. 310 91, 746, 747 

CoUins». Carnegie (1834), 1 A. & E. 695, 703; 3 N. & M. 703 161, .'iig 

Collins V. Gashon (1860), 2 F. & P. 47 1 192 

CoUins J). Godefroy (1831), 1 B. & Ad. g.iO ; 1 D. P. C. 326 819,820 

Collins V. Jackson (1862), 31 Beav. 645 160 

Collins V. Martin (1797), 1 B. & P. 651 : 2 Esp. 250 ; 4 R. R. 752 133 

Collins J>. Maule (1838), 8 C. & P. 502 297, 10.54 

Collins «». Prosser (1823), 1 B. & C. 682; 3 D. & R. 112 1194 

Colhns V. Rhodes {see Re Baker). 

Collins V. Welch (1879), 5 C. P. D. 27 ; 49 L. J. C. P. 260 ; 41 L. T. 786 ; 

28 W. R. 208 41, 42 

Collinson v. Margesson (1858), 27 L. J. Ex. 305 712 

Collis V. Emett (1790), 1 H. Bl. 313 1205 

Collis V. Stack (1867), 1 H. & N. 605 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 138 711 

CoUyer v. WiUock (1827), 12 Moore (C. P.), 657 ; 4 Bing. 313 716 

Colman v. Anderson (1813), 10 Mass. 105 122 

Colt V. Nettervill (1725), 2 P. Wms. 308 685 

Coltmant). Gregory (1871), 4 L. J. Ch. 352; 19 W. R. 671 800 

Coltmant'. Marsh (1811), 3 Taun. 380 712 

Colvin V. Proo. Gen. (1827), 1 Hagg. Ecc. R. 92 174 

Com. '6-. Boynton (1874), 116 Mass. 343 636 

Com. V. Bullard (1812), 9 Mass. 270 74fi 

Com. V. Carey (1823), 2 Pick. 47 1221, 1228 

Com. V. Dana (1841), 2 Mete. 329, 337 600 

Com. V. Downing (1855), 4 Gray. 29 636 

Com. V. Drake (1818), 16 Mass. 161 567, 696 

Com. V. Eberle (1817), 3 Serg. & R. 9 382 

Com. V. Feely (1789-1826), 2 Virg. Cas. 1 873 

Com. V. Green (1822), 17 Mass. 538 910 

Com. «. Griffin (1872), 110 Mass. 181 590 

TAe references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE or CASES CITED. 1y 

PAOB 

Com. V. Hill (1817), 14 Mass. 207 897 

Com. V. Knapp (1830), 9 Pick. 507 654, 568, 585, 632 

Com. V. Kneeland (1838), 20 Pick. 229 16 

Com. V. Lynes (1886), 142 Mass. 577 898 

Com. V. NorcrOHS (1813), 9 Mass. 492 295 

Com. V. Pollard (1847), 12 Meto. 225 630 

Com. V. Richards (1836), 18 Pick. 434 354 

Com. V. Sapp (1890), 29 Amer. St. B. 405 590, 691 

Com. V. Shepherd (1814), 6 Binn. 283 621 

Com. V. Smith (1812), 9 Mass. 107 615 

Com. V. Tilden (undated), cited 2 Stark. Ev. 232, n. 1 615 

Com. V. VasB (1831), 3 Leigh, R. 786 469 

Com. V. Woelper (1817), 3 Serg. & R. 29 1175 

Com. V. Wood (1858), 11 Gray, 85 635 

Comhei!. Corp. of London (1842), 2 Y. & C. C. 0. 631 601, 1183 

Combe v. Pitt (1764), 3 Burr. 1586 ; 1 Wm. Bl. 624 550 

Comm. of Leith Har. & D. v. luspeo. of Poor (1866), L. R. 1 H. L. (So.) 17 1139 

Comm. V. White (1888), 147 Mass. 76 617 

Commercial Bk. of Seotl. v. Rhind (1860), 3 Macq. 643 ; 1 Paterson, 903 . . 632 
Commings v. Heard (1869), 10 B. & S. 606 ; L. R. 4 Q. B. 669 ; 39 L. J. 

Q. B. 9 ; 20 L. T. 976 ; 18 W. R. 16 1160 

Commins v. Scott (1875), L. R. 20 Eq. 11 ; 44 L. J. Ch. 563 ; 32 L. T. 

420 ; 23 W. R. 498 671 

Comptonj). ChandleS8(1801), 4 Esp. 19 1081, 1165 

Concha v. Concha (1886), 11 App. Cas. 541 ; 56 L. J. Ch. 257 ; 56 L. T. 

522 ; 35 W. R. 477 912 

Concha v. Murrietta (1889), 40 Ch. D. 543 ; 60 L. T. 798 937 

Concordia, The (1866), L. E. 1 Adm. 93 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 771 ; 14 L. T. 896. . 6 
Conflans Quarry Co. v. Parker (1867), L. R. 3 C. P. 1 ; 37 L. J. C. P. 61 ; 

17 L. T. 283 ; 16 W. R. 127 308 

Conlou V. Moore (1876), 9 L R. C. L. 190 1114 

Connelly v. Connelly (1850), 2 Roberts. 202 1144, 1145 

Connor, In the goods of, (1892) 29 L. R. Ir. 261 172, Add. [181] 

Connor v. (1842), Ir. Cir. R. 610 832 

Connor v. Cronin (1868), 17 Ir. L. R. 480 133 

Connybeare v. Farries (1869), L. E. 5 Eq. 16 ; 39 L. J. Ex. 26 ; 21 L. T. 

49y _ Qig 

Conradi ■!).' Conradi!(18'68)! L.' R.' IP. '&i>.'bU '; ' 18 L. t] 659 ;' I'e W. R. 

1023 353, 1103 

Conron v. Conron (1858), 7 H. L. C. 168 144 

Conaerv. of Riv. Thames ». Hall (1868), 37 L. J. C. P. 163 ; L. R. 3 C. P. 

415 ; 18 L. T. 361 ; 16 W. R. 971 ". 178 

Constable v. Constable (1879), 11 Ch. D. 681 ; 48 L. J. Ch. 621 ; 40 L. T. 

616 140 

Contract Corp., Re (1871), 40 L. J. Ch. 351 ; L. R. 6 Ch. App. 146 846 

Conway v. Beazley (1831), 3 Hagg. Ecc. R. 639 1144 

Cooeh «. Goodman (1842), 2 Q. B. 580 ; 2 G. & D. 169 ; 6 Jur. 779 . . . .653, 654 

Coode V. Coode (1838), 1 Curt. 755 1048 

Cook, Re (1845), 7 Q. B. 653 ; 14 L. J. Q. B. 188 ; 9 Jur. 869 837 

Cook V. Heam (1832), 1 M. & Rob. 20 319 

Cook v. Lambert (1863), 32 L. J. P. & M. 93 ; 3 S. & T. 46 ; 9 L. T. 211 ; 

11 W. R. 401 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 258 699 

Cook «!. Leonard (1827), 6 B. & C 361 ; 9 Dowl. & R. 339 226 

Cook D. Nethercote (1835), 6 C. & P. 743 918 

Cook V. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1887), 18 Q. B. D. 683 ; 56 

L. J. Q. B. 309 ; 56 L. T. 448 ; 67 L. T. 746 ; 36 W. R. 677 ; 51 J. P. 

630 779 

Cook V. Steams (1814), 11 Mass. 633 683 

Cookv. The State (1893), 40 Am. St. R. 756 Add. [568] 

Cpok«). Tomlinson (1876), 24 W. R. 851 912 

Cooke B.Banks (1826), 2 C. & P. 478 401, 1174 

Cooke V. Butler (1872), 2 Hop. & Colt. 22 ; 21 W. R. 73 ; 27 L. T. 548 ; 42 

L. J. C. P. 23 ; L. R. 9 C. P. 256 1173 

Vol. I. ends with page 633. 



Ivi TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOH 
Cooke i). Green (1823), 11 Price, 736 112 

Cooket). Laniotte(1851), 15Beav. 234; 21 L. J. Ch. 371 136 

Cooke V. Lloyd (1803), Peake, Evid. Appendix xxviii *1* 

Cooke V. Loxley (1792), 5 T. R. 4 ; 2 R. K. 521 96 

Cooke V. Maxwell (1817), 2 Stark. N. P. 183 ; 19 R. R. 700 618, 620, 1031 

Cooke «>. Shollfl793), 6 T. R. 255 1103, 1141 

Cooke V. Tanswell (1818), 2 Moore (C. P.), 513 ; 8 Taun. 131 1210 

Cooke V. Wilby (1884), 25 Ch. D. 769 ; 53 L. J. Ch. 592 ; 50 L. T. 152 ; 

32W. R. 379 13, 1030 

Cooke v. WUdes (1855), 5 E. & B. 328 ; 3 C. L. R. 1090 ; 24 L. J. Q. B. 

367 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 610 47, 111 

Cookes V. Cookes (1863), 3 N. R. 97 ; U W. R. 871 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 843 ... . 462 

Cookea v. Maseall (1694), 2 Vem. 200 639 

Coolei). Braham (1848), 3 Ex. 185 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 105 498, 509, 512 

Coombs, Re (1866), 36 L. J. P. & M. 25 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 302 698 

Coombs V. Bristol and Exeter Ry. Co. (1858), 27 L. J. Ex. 401 ; 3 H. & 

N. 510 692 

Coombs V. Coether (1829), M. & M. 398 1050 

Coombs V. Wilks, (1891) 3 Ch. 77 ; 61 L. J. Ch. 42 ; 65 L. T. 66 ; 40 "W. 

R. 77 671 

Coope V. Cresswell (1866), L. R. 2 Ch. 112 ; 36 L. J. Ch. 1)4 ; 15 L. T. 

42 ; 15 W. R. 242 449 

Cooper, In re. Cooper v. Vesey (1882), 20 Ch. D. 611, 6^9 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 

862 ; 47 L. T. 89 ; 30 W. R. 648 135 

Cooper V. Blandy (1839), 1 Bing. N. C. 45 99 

Cooper V. Bockett (1863, should be 1844), 4 Moo. P. C. C. 419 ; 4 Notes 

of Cases (Eoc. & Mar.), 685 ; 10 Jur. 931 142, 697, 707 

Cooper «). Gibbons (1813), 3 Camp. 363 ,.. 109 

Cooper «. Grant (1852), 12 C. B. 154; 21 L. J. C. P. 197 732 

Cooper D. Harding (1845), 7 Q. B. 928 ; 9 Jur. 777 848 

Cooper D.Lloyd (1859), 6 C. B. N. S. 619 622 

Cooper V. Macdonald (1867), 36 L. J. Eq. 304 1036 

Coiper V. Macdonald (1873), 42 L. J. Ch. 633, 638 ; L. R. 16 Eq. 258 ; 28 

L. T. 693 806 

Cooper V. Marsden (1793), 1 Esp. 1 467 

Cooper V. Metrop. Board of Works (1883), 25 Ch. D. 472 ; 50 L. T. 602 . . 597 

Cooper V. Meyer (1830), 10 B. & C. 468 547, 648 

Cooper V. Robinson (1842), 10 M. & W. 694 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 48 756 

Cooper V. Shepherd (1846), 3 C. P. 272 ; 4 D. & L. 218 ; 15 L. J. C. P. 

237 ; 10 Jur. 758 1115 

Cooper V. Slade (1858), 6 E. & B. 447 ; 25 L. J. Q. B. 324 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 

1016 104, 106, 586 

Cooper i>. Smith (1812), 15 East, 103 ; 13 R. R. 397 672 

Cooper «;. Taylor (1844), 6 M. & Gr. 989 ; 7 Scott, M. R. 950; 13 L. J. 

C. P. 92 ; 8 Jur. 450 532 

Cooper V. "Wands. Board of "Works (1863), 32 L. J. C. P. 185 ; 14 C. B. 

N. S. 180; 9 Jur. N. S. 1166; 11 "W. R. 646 1148 

Cooper V. "Woolfitt (1857), 26 L. J. Ex. 310 ; 2 H. & N. 122 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 

870 146 

Coorg, Rajah of «). East India Co. (1856), 25 L. J. Ch. 345 618 

Cootei). Boyd (1789), 2 Bro. C. C. 521 807, 808 

Coote V. Leighworth (1596), Moore (F.), 457 543 

Cope, Re (1850), 2 Roberts. 335 701 

Copes;. Cope (1833), 5 0. & P. 604; 1 M. & Rob. 269, 27 ..101,621,622,1170 

Cope V. Mooney (1862), 14 Ir. C. L. R. 256 ; 10 L. T. 854 1163 

Cope V. Rowlands (1836), 2 M. & "W. 160 ; 2 Gale, 231 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 63. . 150 

Cope V. Thames Haven Dock Co. (1848), 2 C. & Kir. 757 929, 960 

Cope V. Thames Haven Dock & Rail. Co. (1849), 3 Ex. 841 ; 6 Railw. Cas. 

83 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 345 642 

Copeland v. "Watts (1815), 1 Stark. 95 598 

Copiu V. Adamson (1875), L. R. 9 Ex. 345 ; 43 L. J. Ex. 161 ; 31 L. T. 

242; 22'W. R. 658 1147 

Copland v. Toulrain (1840), 7 CI. & Ein. 350 486 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Ivii 

Copley 41. Burton (1870), L. R. 5 C. P. 489; 39 L. J. M. 0. 141; 22 

L. T. 888 263 

Copp V. Upham (1825), 3 New Hamp. 159 969 

Copper Miners' Co. v. Pox (1851), 16 Q. B. 229 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 174 ; 15 

Jur. 703 531, 642 

Corbett v. Corbett (1813), 1 Ves. & B. 335 329 

Corbishley's Trusts, Re (1880), 14 Ch. Div. 846 ; 49 L. J. Oh. 266 ; 28 

W. R. 536 172 

Corder, Re (1848), 6 Notes of Oas. (Eoo. & Mar.), 656 698 

Cordery v. Colville (or Colvin) (1863), 14 C. B. N. S. 374 ; 32 L. J. C. P. 

210; 9 Jut. N. S. 1200; 8 L. T. 245 521 

Cordwent v. Hunt (1818), 8 Taun. 696 750 

Cork, Bp. of, V. Porter (1877), Ir. U C, L. 94 961 

Cork and Bandon Ry. Co. v. Cazenove (1847), 10 Q. B. 935 ; 11 Jur. 802.. 100 
Cork and Bandon %. Co. v. Goode (1853), 13 C. B. 826; 22 L. J. C. P. 

198 ; 17 Jur. 555 76 

Cornelius Regan, Re ( 1838), 1 Curt. 908 696 

Cornell V. Baker (1885), 29 Ch. D. 711 ; 54 L. J. Ch. 844; 52 L. T. 421.. 913 

Cornell v. Green (1823), 10 Serg. & R. 14, 16 354 

Cornfoot v. Fowke (1840), 6 M. & W. 377 ; 4 Jur. 919 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 297. . 200 

Cornforth v. Smithard (1859), 5 H. & N. 13 ; 29 L. J. Ex. 228 ; 8 W. R. 8 711 

Cornish v. Abingtou (1859), 4 H. & N. 549 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 262 638 

Cornish v. Clark (1872), L. R. 14 Eq. 184 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 14 ; 26 L. T. 494 ; 

20 "W. E. 897 135 

Cornish v. Hockin (1853), 1 E. & B. 602 ; 22 L. J. Q. B. 142 ; 17 Jur. 

1049 186 

Cornwall v. Richardson (1825), By. & M. 305 219, 252, 255, 256 

Corsen v. Dubois ( 1816), Holt, N. P. R. 239 698 

Cort V. Ambergate, &o. By. Co. (1851), 17 Q. B. 127 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 460 ; 

15 Jur. 877 751 

Cortis V. Kent Waterworks Co. (1827), 7 B. & C. 314 151 

Cory V. Bretton (1830), 4 C. & P. 462 514 

Cory V. Davis (1863), 14 C. B. N. S. 370 282 

Cosmopolitan, Re (1848), 6 Notes of Cas. (Ecc. & Mar.), Supp. xxviii. .... 177 

Cosnahan v. Grioe (1862), 15 Moo. P. C. C. 215 638 

Cossens, Ex parte, WarraU, Re (1820), Buck, 531, 545 970 

Cossens v. Cossens (1737), Willes, 25 92 

Cossey v. Lend. & Bright. Ry. Co. (1870), L. R. 5 C. P. 146 ; 39 L. J. C. P. 

174 ; 22 L. T. 19 ; 18 W. R. 493 599, 1186 

Costa Rica, Rep. of </. Erlanger (1875), 44 L. J. Ch. 281; L. R. 19 

Eq. 33 321 

Coster V. Hetherington (1859), 8 Cox, C. C. 175 ; 1 E. & E. 802 ; 28 L. J. 

M. 0. 193 1073 

Cotohing V. Basset (1862), 32 L. J. Ch. 286 ; 32 Beav. 101 ; 9 Jul-. N. S. 

590 ; 11 W. B. 197 523 

Cotes «). Davis (1808), 1 Camp. 485 604 

Cotesworth v. Spokes (1861), 30 L. J. C. P. 220 ; 10 C. B. N. S. 103 ; 7 Jur. 

N. S. 803 522 

Cottam V. Partridge (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 271 ; 4 Scott, N. R. 819 ; 11 L. J. 

C. P. 161 713 

Cotterill v. Hobby (1826), 4 B. & C. 465 ; 6 D. & R. 661 286 

Cottington, Ex parte (1678), 2 Swans. 326 1150 

Cottle, Ex parte (1850), 2 Mac. & G. 186 ; 2 H. & T. 382 ; 19 L. J. Ch. 

368 640 

Cotton, Re (1848), 6 Notes of Caa. (Ecc. & Mar.) 307 698 

CottreU f . Hughes (1855), 15 C. B. 532 ; 3 C. L. R. 496 ; 24 L. J. C. P. 

107 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 448 126, 127 

(Jottrill V. Myrick (1835), 3 Fairf. 222 932 

Conch V. Meeker (1817), 2 Conn. 302 755 

Couling V. Coxe (1848), 6 C B. 703 ; 6 Dowl. & L. 399 ; 18 L. J. C. P. 100 ; 

13 Jur. 101 835 

Cnunhavp. Re (1873), L. R. 8Q. B.410; 42 L. J. Q. B.217 ; 38L.T. 761; 

ZlW. R. 883 1028 

Vol. I. ends with page 635, 



Iviii TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOH 

Courteem;. Touse (1807), 1 Camp. 43 ; 10 R. R. 627 92i 

Cousins u. Paddon (1835), 2 C. M. & R. 547; 5 L. J. Ex. 49; 6 Tyr. 

536 222 

Coutts V. Acworth (1869), 38 L. J. Ch. 694 ; L. R. 8 Eq. 558 ; 21 L. T. 

224 ; 17 W. R. 1121 136 

Couturier v. Hastie (1852), 8 Ex. 40 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 97 677 

Coventry v. Great Eastern Ry. Co. (1883), 11 Q,. B. D. 776 ; 52 L. J. Q. B. 

694 ; 49 L. T. 641 548 

Cowan V. Abrahams (1793), 1 Esp. 50 289, 318 

Cowan V. Braidwood (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 882 ; 2 Soott, N. R. 138 ; 9 D. 

P. C. 27 ] 142, 1143, 1146, 1147, 1164 

Cowburn, Re {see Ex parte Eirth). 

Cowell». Chambers (1856), 21 Beav. 619 1092 

Cowie V. HalsaU (1821), 4 B. & Ad. 197 ; 3 Stark. N. P. 36 119^ 

Cowie V. Remfry (1846), 5 Moo. P. C. C. 232 ; 3 Moo. Ind. App. 448 ; 10 

Jur. 789 298 

Cowley V. Knapp (1886), 42 N. J. L. 297 693 

Cowling D. Ely (1818), 2 Stark. R. 366 ; 20 R. R. 694 488 

Co-wper V. Lord Cowper (1734), 2 P. Wms. 720, 748, 749, 760, 751, 752 . . 108 
Cox's Trusts, Re (1878), 47 L. J. Ch. 735 ; 9 Ch. D. 169 ; 27 W. R. 63 . . 139 

Cox V. Allingham (1822), Jae. 614 1046 

Cox V. Camion (1838), 4 Bing. N. C. 453 ; 6 Dowl. 625 732 

Cox V. Hill, (1892) 36 Sol. J. 446 193 

Cox «. Knight (1856), 18 C.B.N. S. 645; 25 L.J. C. P. 314 •.... 99 

Cox V. Middleton (1856), 2 Drew. 209 ; 2 Eq. Rep. 631 ; 23 L. J. 

Ch. 618 673 

Cox V. Midi. Ry. Co. (1849), 3 Ex. 268 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 65 ; 14 Jur. 65 ; 5 

Railw. Cas. 583 641 

Coxf. Newman (1813), 2 Ves. & B. 168 1037 

Cox 4). Reid (1849), 13 Q. B. 568 ; 18 L. J. Q. B. 216 ; 13 Jur. 663 ....39,227 

Cox V. Walter (should be Walker) (undated), cited 9 C. & P. 339 269 

Cox V. Willoughby (1880), 13 Ch. D. 863 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 237 ; 42 L. T. 125 ; 

28 W. R. 603 169 

Coxhead v. MuUis (1878), 3 C. P. D. 439; 47 L. J. C. P. 761 ; 39 L. T. 

349 ; 27 W. R. 136 718 

Coxhead®. Richards (1846), 2 0. B. 684; 15 L. J. C. P. 278; 10 Jur. 984.. 39, 

47, 111 

Coyle ». Great North of Ireland By. Co. (1887), 20 L. R. Ir. 409 163 

Craig V. Fenn (1841), C. & Marsh. 43 259 

Crane v. London Dock Co. (1864), 33 L. J. Q. B. 224 ; 6 B. & S. 313 ; 10 

L.T.372: 12W.R.745; 10 Jur. N. S. 984 7 

Crane v. Marshall (1839), 4 Shepl. 27 443 

Crane -tf. Powell (1868), 38 L. J. C. P. 43 ; L. R. 4 C. P. 123 ; 20 L. T. 

703 ; 17 W. R. 161 672 

Craven, Ex parte (1870), 39 L. J. Bank. 33 ; L. R. 10 Eq. 648 ; 23 L. T. 

663 ; 18 W. R. 1022 : afld. sub nom. Craven, Ex parte, Tempest, In re, 

L. R. 6Ch. 70; 40L. J. Bank. 22; 23L. T. 650; 19 W. R. 137 .... 82 

Craven v. Halliley (1838), cited Thomas v. Connell, 4 M. & W. 270 379 

Crawoour v. Salter (1881), 18 Ch. D. 30 ; 46 L. T. 62 6, 611 

Crawford v. Crawford (1867), Ir. R. 2 Eq. 166 710, 711 

Crawford and Lindsay Peer. (1848), 2 H. L. C. 634, 550 ; 2 Macq. 479 . . 134, 

423, 1018, 1227 

Crawford v. Spencer (1851), 62 Mass. 418 767 

Cray v. Halls (1825), cited Smith v. Blandy, Ry. & M. 269 479 

Creagh v. Blood (1845), 3 J. & La T. 133, 161 660 

Crease v. Barrett (1835), 1 C. M. & R. 919 ; 6 Tyr. 468 ; 4 L. J. Ex, 297. . 393, 

396, 396, 397, 401, 404, 413, 436. 444, 446, 610 
Credland v. Potter (1874), 10 L. R, Ch. 8 ; 44 L. J. Ch. 169 ; 31 L. T, 

622 ; 23 W. R. 36 738 

Creen v. Wright (1877), 2 0. P. D. 364 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 427 ; 36 L. T. 355 ; 

26 W. R. 602 42 

Creevy »>. Carr (1836), 7 C. & P. 64 245, 942 

Crepps V. Durden (1776-7), 2 Cowp, 140 ; 1 Sm. L, C. 692 lue 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Ixix 

FAas 

Crerer v. Sodo (1827), M. & M. 85 ; 3 0. & P. 10 274 

CresBwell i;. Jackson (1860), 2 F. & F. 24 1224 

Crew 41. Saunders (1734-6), 2 Str. 1005 993, 996, 997 

Crippsj). Da-pis (1843), 12 M. & W, 159; 13 L. J. Ex. 217 713,714 

Cripps V. HartnoU (1863), 32 L. J. Q. B. 381 ; 10 Jur. N. 8. 300 ; 8 L. T. 

765 ; 11 W. R. 953 678 

Cripps V. HiUs (1844), 6 Q. B. 606 ; 1 Dav. & M. 544 ; 8 Jur. 466 ; 13 

L. J. Q. B. 130 49 

Cripps V. Wells (1843), C. & Mar. 489 '. 271 

Crlsdee n. Bolton (1827), 3 C. & P. 240 44 

Crisp V. Anderson (1815), 1 Stark. R. 35 ; 18 R. R. 744 109, 133 

Crispin ». Doglioni (1862), 32 L. J. P. & M. 109 ; 3 S. & T. 44 ; 8 D. T. 

91 ; 11 W. R. 500 309,-414 

Croft V. Croft (1863), 4 S. & T. 10 ; 34 L. J. P. & M. 44 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 

183; IIL. T. 781; 13 W. R. 526 967 

Croft V. Graham (1863), 2 De G. J. & Sm. 155 ; 9 L. T. 589 137 

Croft V. Lumley (1857-8), 5 E. & B. 648 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 223 ; 27 L. J. Q. B. 

321; 6H. L. Cas. 672; 4 Jur. N. S. 903 522 

Croft 41. Rickmansworth Highway Board (1888), 57'L. J. Ch. 689 121 

Crofton4). Poole (1830), 1 B. & Ad. 568 519 

Crofts V. Marshall (1836), 7 G. & P. 597 765 

Crokerv. M. of Hertford (1844), 4 Moo. P. 0. C. 339 702, 708 

Cromaok v. Heathoote (1820), 4 Moore (0. P.) 357 ; 2 B. & B. 4 591, 592 

Crompton v. Butler (1790), 1 Hagg. Cons. 460 632 

Cronk v. Frith (1839), 9 C. & P. 197 ; 2 M. & Rob. 262 1209 

Crook V. Dowling (1782), 3 Doug. 77 1013, 1014 

Crook V. HiU (1876), 3 Ch. D. 773 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 119 ; 24 W. R. 786 145 

Crook V. Seaford' (Corpn. of) (1871), L. R. 6 Ch. 661; 25 L. T. 1 ; 19 

W. R. 938 645 

Crookenden v. Fuller (1859), 29 L. J. P. & M. 1 ; 1 S. & T. 441 ; 5 Jur. 

N. S. 1222 ; 1 L. T. 70 179, 180 

Crookewit v. Fletcher (1857), 26 L. J. Ex. 153 ; 1 H. & N. 893 1198 

Cropper v. Smith (1884), 26 Oh. D. 710 ; 53 L. J. Ch. 891 ; 51 L. T. 733 ; 

33 "W. R. 60 187 

Croshie v. Thompson (1847), 11 Ir. Eq. R. 404 487 

Crosby v. Hetheringtoiv (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 933 ; 5 Scott, N. R. 637 ; 12 

X. J. 0. P. 261 6, 7 

Crosby v. Percy (1808), 1 Taun. 364 372, 1214 

Crosby v. Wadeworth (1806), 6 East, 602 ; 2 Smith, 659 ; 8 R. R. 566 687 

Cross V. Kaye (1796), 6 T. R. 663 618 

Crosse v. Bedingfield (1821), 12 Sim. 35 488 

Crossley, Ex parte. Re Taylor (1872), L. R. 13 Eq. 409 ; 41 L. J. Bank. 

35 848 

Crossley v. Dixon (1863), 32 L. J. Ch. 617 ; 10 H. L. Cas. 293 ; 9 Jur. 

N. S. 607; 8L. T. 260; 11 W. R. 716 644 

Crossley v. Elworthy (1871), L. R. 12 Eq. 168 ; 40 L. J. Ch. 480 ; 24 L. T. 

607 ; 19 W. R. 842 135 

Crossley v. Lightowler (1867), L. R. 3 Eq. 279 ; 2 Ch. App. 478 ; 36 L. J. 

Ch. 5S4 ; 16 W. R. 801 Ill 

Crossley v. Maycock (1874), L. E. 18 Eq. 180; 43 L. J. Ch. 379; 22 

W. R. 387 -673 

Crotty V. Hodges (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 661 ; 6 Scott, N. R. 221 1194 

Crouch V. Cred. Fon. of England (1873), L. R. 8 Q. B. 374 ; 42 L. J. 

Q. B. 183; 29L. T. 259; 21 W. R. 946 660 

Crouch V. Hooper (1852), 16 Beav. 182 421 

Croudson v. Leonard (1808), 4 Cranch, 434 1150 

Croughton v. Blake (1843), 12 M. & W. 206 ; 13 L. J. Ex. 78 ; 8 Jur. ' 

275 1060, 1109, 1169 

Crowder v. Hopkins (1843), 10 Paige, 190 433, 614 

Crowe 4). Clay (1854), 9 Ex. 604 ; 23 L. J. Ex. 150 ; 18 Jar. 654 307 

Crowley 4-. Page (1837), 7 0. & P. 789 9.i4 

Crowley 4;. Vitty (1852), 7 Ex. 319 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 135 657 

Crowninshield's case (1830), 10 Pick. 497 382 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



IX TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PA8H 

Crowninsliield v. Crowninshield (1854), 2 Gray, 524 170, 262 

Crowther v. Appleby (1873), L. R. 9 C. P. 23 ; 43 L. J. C. P. 7 ; 29 L. T. 

580 ; 22 W. R. 265 814 

Crowther v. Solomons (1848), 6 C. B. 758 ; 18 L. J. C. P. 92 13i 

Croxton V. May (1876), 9 Ch. D. 388 ; 39 L. T. 461 ; 27 W. R. 327 101 

Cruise v. Clancy (1844), 6 Ir. Eq. R. 552 305, 1223 

Cubitt V. Porter (lh28), 8 B. & G. 267 ; 2 M. & R. 267 113 

Cuff V. Penn (1813), 1 M. & Sel. 21 ; 14 R. R. 384 752 

Cumberland v. Copeland (1861), 1 H. & C. 194 ; 31 L. J. Ex. 353 ; 9 Jur. 

N. S. 253 ; 7 L. T. 334 730 

Cuming t: French (1809), 2 Camp. 106, n 615 

Cummin JJ. Smith (1816), 2 Serg- & R. 440 620 

Cumming ». Roebuck (1816), Holt, N. P. R. 172 297 

Cundell V. Pratt (1827), M. & M. 108 967, 968 

CunUfiet). Sefton (1802), 2 East, 183 328, 1214, 1216 

Cunningham, Re (1860), 29 L. J. P. & M. 71 ; 4 S. & T. 194 704 

Cunningham v. Cunningham (1814), 2 Uow, 483 149 

Curlewis v. Corfield (1841), 1 a. & D. 489 ; 1 Q. B. 814 ; 6 Jur. 259 . .520, 521 

Curling V. Perring (1835), 2 Myl. & K. 380 ; 4 L. J. Ch. 80 601 

Curren v. Crawford (1818), 4 Serg. & R. 3, 5 458 

Currie v. Anderson (1859), 2 E. & E. 592 ; 29 L. J. Q. B. 87 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 

442; 8 W. R. 274 689, 692 

Currie v. Child and Brown (1812), 3 Camp. 283 1207, 1213 

Curry v. Walter (1796), 1 Esp. 456; 5 R. R. 743; 1 Bos. & P. 525; 

4R. R. 717 612 

Curtin V. Evans (1872), Ir. R. 9 Eq. 653 806 

Curtis 1). Hunt (1824), 1 C. & P. 180 553 

Curtis V. Mackenzie (1877), W. N. No. 45 of 1877, Ch. D. 213 806 

Curtis V. March (1858), 3 H. & JST. 866 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 36 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 

1112 16 

Curtis V. M'Sweeney (1841), Ir. Cir. R. 343 1211 

Curtis V. Pugh (1847), 10 Q. B. Ill ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 199 690 

Curtis V. Rickards (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 47 ; 1 Scott, N. R. 155 ; 4 Jur. 

508 118 

Curzon v. Lomax (1803), 6 East, 60 397, 403 

Cusack V. Farrell (1887), 18 L. R. Ir. 494 ; 20 L. R. Ir. 56 152 

Cusack V. Robinson (1861), 1 B. & S. 299 ; 30 L. J. Q. B. 261 ; 7 Jur. 

N.'S. 542; 4L. T. 506; 9W. R. 735 689, 690 

Cutbush V. Gilbert (1818), 4 Serg. & R. 665 279 

Cuthbert o. Cumming (1855), 11 Ex. 406 ; 24 L. J. Ex. 310 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 

686 768 

Cutler V. NewHu (1819), Mann. Dig. N. P. 137 508 

Cutler V. Pope (1836), 1 Shepl. 337 686 

Cutto V. Gilbert (1854), 9 Moo. P. C. C. 143 143, 705 

Cutts V. Pickering (1672), 1 Ventr. 197 606 

Cutts V. U. S. (1812), 1 Gall. 69 1199 

Cutts V. Ward (1867), L. R. 2 Q. B. 367 ; 36 L. J. Q. B. 161 ; 8 B. & S. 

277; 18L. T. 614; 16 W. R. 445 723 



D. falsely called F. v. F. (1864), 34 L. J. P. & M. 66 167 

Dabbs V. Humphries (1834), 10 Bing. 44 6 ; 4 M. & Sc. 285 711 

Da Costa v. Edmunds (1815), 4 Camp. 143 ; 2 Chitty, 227 ; 16 R. R. 763.. 765 

Da Costa v. Jones (177H), 2 Cowp. 729 620 

Da Costa v. Pym (1797), Peake, Add. Cas. 144 1221 

Da Costa J). Villa Real (1734), 2 Str. 961 U03, 1107 

Dagleish v. Dodd (1832), 6 C. & P. 238 484 

Dailies v. Hartley (1848), 3 Ex. 200 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 81 929 

Daines ». Heath (1847), 3 C. B. 938 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 117 ; 11 Jur. 185.. .. 1206 

Daintry v. Brooklehurst (1848), 3 Ex. 207 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 67 117 

Daioz, The (1878), 47 L. J. Adm. 1 ; 37 L. T. 137 178 

Dalby v. Hirst (1819), 1 B. & B. 224 ; 3 Moore (0. P.), 536 782 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs . 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Ixi 

PAOB 

Dale's case (1881), 6 Q. B. D. 474; 50 L. J. Q. B. 234; 43 L. T. 786 ; 

45 J. P. 284 •. 846 

Dale V. HamUton (1846), 5 Hare, 369 ; 2 Phillips, 266 ; 16 L. J. Ch. 126, 

397 ; 11 Jur. 163, 574 688 

Dalev. Humfrey (1858), 26 L. J. Q. B. 137; 7 E. & B. 266; 27 L. J. 

Q. B. 390 ; B. B. & E. 1004 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 191 769 

Dalgleish v. Hodgson (1831), 7 Bing. 495 ; 5 M. & P. 407 1149 

DaUson v. Stark (1803), 4 Esp. 163 2S9 

Dallow, Ee (1866), 35 L. J. P. & M. 81 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 189 701 

Dalrymple v. Dalrymple (1811), 2 Hagg. Cons. 64 7, 936 

Dalrymple v. HaU (1881), 16 Ch. D. 715 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 302 ; 29 W. B. 421 146 

Dalston v. Coatsworth (1721), 1 P. "Wms. 731 ; 3 Brown, P. C. 550 108 

DaltoD V. Angus (1881), 6 App. Caa. 1740 ; 50 L. J. Q. B. 689 ; 44 L. T. 

844 ; 30 W. R. 191 ; 46 J. P. 132 115 

Daly's Settlements, Re (1858), 25 Beav. 456 ; 27 L. J. Ch. 751 ; 31 L. T. 

278; 6 W. B. 533; 4 Jur. N. S. 525 1144 

Dalyv. Att.-Gen. (1870), I. B. 8 Eq. 595 139 

Daly V. Wilson (1842), Milw. 658 435, 446 

DalzeU v. Mair (1808), 1 Camp. 532 542 

Damerell v. Protheroe (1847), 10 Q. B. 20 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 170 ; 11 Jur. 

331 397, 404 

Dan V. Brown (1825), 4 Cowen, 483, 492 493, 705 

Dance v. Bobson (1829), M. & M. 295 20, 1045 

Dancer v. Crabb (1873), 42 L. J. P. & M. 53 ; L. R. 3 P. & D. 98 ; 28 

L. T. 914 703 

Dandridge v. Corden (1827), 3 C. & P. U 960 

Dane v. Kirkwall (1838), 8 C. & P. 683 1102 

Danford v. MoAnulty (1883), 8 App. Cas. 456 ; 52 L. J. Q. B. 652 ; 49 

Ij. T. 207 ; 31 W. B. 817 221 

D'Angibau, In re, Andrews ». Andrews (1880), 15 Ch. D. 228 ; 49 L. J. 

Ch. 756; 43L. T. 135; 28 W. R. 930 100 

Daniel v. Bond (1861), 9 C. B. N. S. 716 ; 3 L. T. 700 ; 9 "W. R. 313 . . . . 1186 

Daniel v. Luker (1571), 3 Dyer, 305a, pi. 58 1151 

Daniel v. North (1809), 11 East, 375 446 

Daniel v. Pitt (1808), Peake, Add. Cas. 238 ; 6 Esp. 74 ; 1 Camp. 366, n. ; 

10 R. R. 706, n 498 

Daniel v. Thompson (1812), 15 East, 78 837 

Daniel w. Wilkin (1852), 7 Ex. 429; 21 L. J. Ex. 236 396, 404 

Daniellf.Daniell(1840),4DeG. J.&Sm. 337; 18 L. J. Ch. 157; 13 Jur. 164 803 

Daniels t). Conrad (1833), 4 Leigh R. 401, 40;j 954 

Daniels v. Harris (1874), 44 L. J. C. P. 1 ; L. R. 10 C. P. 1 ; 31 L. T. 408 ; 

23 W. R. 86 770 

Daniels v. Potter (1830), M. & M. 601 385, 386, 493 . 

Dansey v. Richardson (1854), 3 E. & B. 144 ; 2 C. L. R. 1442 ; 23 L. J. 

Q. B. 217 ; 18 Jur. 721 162 

Darby v. Ouseley (1856), 1 H. & N. 1 ; 25 L. J. Ex. 227 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 497.. 46, 

243, 291, 483, 931 

Daroys, Re (1860), 11 Ir. C. L. R. 298 621 

Darley v. Martin (1853), 13 Q. B. 684 ; 22 L. J. C. P. 249 ; 17 Jur. 1125.. 740 
Darlington, &c. Bank. Co., Ex parte (1864),4D. J.&S. 681; 34L.J.Bk.lO 160 
Darrell v. Evans (1862), 30 L. J. Ex. 254 ; 6 H. & N. 660 ; 1 H. & C. 174; 

31 L. J. Ex. 337 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 104 ; 7 L. T. 97 ; 10 W. R. 665 730 

Dartmouth, Ly., v. Roberts (1812), 16 East, 334 510, 1013 

Darrill v. Roper (1855), 3 Drew. 294 ; 24 L. J. Ch. 779 •. 50 

Dashwood v. Jermyn (1879), 12 Ch. D. 776 ; 27 W. R. 868 680 

Davenport v. The Queen (1877), 3 App. Cas. 116 ; 47 L. J. P. 0. 8 ; 37 

L. .T. 727 522 

Davey v. Shannon (1879), 4 Ex. D. 81 ; 48 L. J. Ex. 459 ; 40 L. T. 628 ; 

27 W. R. 599 682 

David V. Preece (1843), 5 Q. B. 440 ; 13 L. J. Q. B. 88 192 

Davidson i>. Cooper (1843), 11 M. & W. 784 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 467 ; 13 M. & 

W. 343; 13L. J. Ex. 276 134,1193,1194,1196,1198,1200,1201,1202 

Davidson v. Kimpton (1881), 18 Ch. D. 213 ; 45 L. T, 132 ; 29 W. E. 912.. 101 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



Ixii TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAQB 

Davidson r. Smyth (1887), 20 L. K. Ir. 326 110 

Davidson v. Wood (see Wood's Estate). 

Davie (should be Davey) v. London & S. W. Ey. Co. (1883), 12 Q. B. D. 

70 ; 63 L. J. Q. B. 58 ; 49 L. T. 739 ; 48 J. P. 279 163 

Davies, Ex parte, Ee Sadler (1881), 19 Ch. D. 86 ; 46 L. T. 632 ; 30 

W. E. 237 645 

Davies, Re (1849), 2 Eoberts. 377 696 

Daviess. Brown (1^24), 9 Moore (C. P.), 778 998 

Davies v. Campbell (1841), 1 IredeU, 482 443 

Davies 9. Davies (1840), 9 C. & P. 252 956, 957, 1013 

Davies v. Davies (1863), 2 New E. 384 ; 4 GifE. 417 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 1002 ; 

11 W. E. 1040 ; 9 L. T. 161 136 

Davies v. Dodd (1817), Wils. Ex. 110 308 

Davies v. Edwards (1861), 7 Ex. 22 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 4 ; 15 Jur. 1014 71o 

Davies v. Fitton (1842), 2 Dr. & War. 232 749, 7o0 

Davies v. Humphreys (1840), 6 M. & W. 153, 166 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 263 .... 440 
Davies v. Lovnides (1843), 7 Scott, N. E. 214 ; 6 M. & Gr. 527 ; 12 L. J. 

0. P. 606 146, 408, 409, 414, 416, 424, 426 

Davies v. D. of Marlborough (1818), 2 Swans. 108 137 

Davies v. MarshaU (1861), 10 C. B. N. S. 697 ; 31 L. J. C. P. 61 ; 7 Jur. 

N. S. 1247 ; 4 L. T. 581 ; 9 W. E. 866 523 

Davies v. Morgan (1831), 1 C. & J. 587 ; 1 Tyr. 467 396, 410, 416, 442 

Davies v. Nicholas (1836), 7 C. & P. 339 152 

Davies v. Otty (1866), 36 Beav. 208 ; 34 L. J. Ch. 252 ; 13 W. E. 484 ; 

12 L. T. 789 ; 5 N. E. 391 971 

Davies ». Pierce (1787), 2 T. E. 63 ; 1 E. E. 419 444, 446, 610 

Davies v. Eidge (1802), 3 Esp. 101 ; 6 E. E. 817 493 

Davies v. Stainbank (1865), 6 De G. M. & G. 679 758 

Davies v. Waters (1842), 9 M. & W. 608 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 651 ; 11 L. J. Ex. 

214 697, 607 

Davies v. White (1884), 53 L. J. Q. B. 275 ; 60 L. T. 327 ; 32 W. E. 520.. 1062 

Davis's Trusts, Ee (1869), L. E. 8 Eq. 98; 21 L. T. 137 9 

Davis V. Black (1841), 1 Q. B. 911, 912 ; 1 G. & D. 432 ; 6 Jur. 65 ; 10 

L. J. Q. B. 338 85 

Davis ». Capper (1829), 4 C.& P. 134a, 138; lOB. &C. 33 ; 5 M. & Ey. 53. .36, 37 

Davis V. Curling (1845), 8 Q. B. 287 ; 15 L. J. Q. B. 56 ; 10 Jur. 69 227 

Davis V. Dale (1830), M. & M. 614 ; 4 C. & P. 335 942 

Davis V. Davis (1880), 13 Ch. Div. 861 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 241 ; 41 L. T. 790 ; 

28 W. E. 346 508 

Davis V. Dodd (1812), 4 Taun. 602 307 

Davis V. Hedges (1871), L. E. 6 Q. B. 687 ; 40 L. J. Q. B. 276 ; 25 L. T. 

155 ; 20 W. E. 60 1122 

Davis ». Jones (1856), 17C. B. 625; 25 L. J. C. P. 91 746 

Davis ». Lloyd (1844), 1 C. & K. 276 436, 456, 1048 

Davis ». Lovell (1839), 7 DoTvl. 178 ; 4M. &W. 679; 8L. J. Ex. 152. .816, 835 
Davis ». Lowndes (1836), 6 Scott, 738 ; 1 Arn. 379 ; 7 Dowl. P. C. 101 ; 2 

Jur. 945 1098, 1227 

Davis V. Mason (1826), 4 Pick. 166 931 

Davis V. Eainsford (1821), 17 Mass. 210 802 

Davis V. Eeid (1832), 5 Sim. 443 965 

Davis V. Sorace [or Scrase) (1869), 4 L. E. C. P. 172 ; 38 L. J. M. C. 79 ; 

19 L. T. 789 ; 17 W. E. 411 263 

Davis V. Spurling (1829), 1 Euss. & M. 68 482 

Davis V. Trehame (1881), 50 L. J. Ch. 665 ; 6 App. Cas. 460 ; 29 W. E. 869. 1 14 
Davis «>. Trevanion (1846), 2 D. & L. 743 ; 14 L. J. Q. B. 138; 9 Jur. 492. . 734 

Davis V. Vass (1812), 15 East, 97 1039 

Davis V. Waddington (1844), 7 M. & Gr. 44 : 8 Scott, N. E. 807 ; 1 Lutw. 

Eeg. Cas. 169 ; 14 L. J. C. P. 45 ; 8 Jul-. 1142 791 

Davis V. Williams (1811), 13 East, 232 ; 1 Smith, 6 1045, 1046, 1054 

Davis V. Wood (1816), 1 Wheat. 6 368 

Davisont!. Gent(1856),26L. J. Ex. 122; IH. &N. 744; 3 Jur. N. S. 342.660, 661 

Davison v. Stanley (1768), 4 Burr. 2213 668 

Davhn v. Hill (1834), 2 Fairf. 434 766 

The referenoea are to pages, not to paragrapKt. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Ixiii 

Davy V. Garrett (1877), 7 Ch. D. 473 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 218 ; 38 L. T. 77 ; 26 

"W. B. 225 187 

Dawes®. Peek (1799), 8 T. R. 330; 3 Esp. 12 ; 4 E."b. 675" .'!!!.'.'!!!.".' .' 691 
Dawkinss. Antrobus (1879), 17 Ch. D. 615: 44 L. T. 557; 29 W.Il. 611. . 1147 
Dawkins v. Paulet (1869), L. E. 5 Q. B. 94 ; 9 B. & S. 768 ; 39 L. J. Q. B. 

53 ; 21 L. T. 684 ; 18 W. R. 336 46 

Dawkins v. Eokeby, Ld. (1873), L. K. 8 Q. B. 255 ; 42 L. J. Q. B. 63 ; 28 

L. T. 134 ; 21 W. R. 544 618, 619, 865 

Daws V. Shed (1818), 15 Mass. 6 508 

Dawson v. Chamney (1843), 5 Q. B, 164 ; D. & M. 348 ; 13 L. J. Q. B. 

33 ; 7 Jut. 1037 162 

DawBon v. Dawson (1867), L. R. 4 Eq. 504 .'.'.'.' 806 

Dawson v. Gregory (1846), 7 Q. B. 756 ; 14 L. J. Q. B. 286 ; 9 Jur. 688. . 1033 
Dawson v. Jay (1854), 2 Sm. & G. 199 ; 22 L. T. 345 ; 23 L. T. 36 ; 

2W. R. 311 ; 1150 

Dawson v. Maodonald (1836), 2 M. & "W. 26 ; 2 Gale, 215 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 

10 225 

Dawson v. Remnant (1806), 6 Esp. 24 . , 552 

Day V. Bather (1863), 2 H. & C. 14 ; 32 L. J. Ex. 171 : 9 Jur. n! S.'iio"; 

8L. T. 205; 11 W. R. 575.... 162 

Dayti. King (1836), 5 A. & E. 359; 6 N. & M. 845; 2 H. & W. 178, .132, 1137 

Days. Spread (1842), Jebb & B. 163 1103 1141 

Day ». Trig (1715), 1 P. "Wms. 286 801 

Day ». Wimams (1832), 2 C. & J. 461 ; 1 L. J. Er. 168 125 

Deacle v. Hancock (1824), McCleland, 85 ; 13 Price, 226 401, 410 

Deacon's case (1746), 18 How. St. Tr. 365 236 

Deady v, Harrison (1815), 1 Stark. 60 514 

Dean«. Green (1882), 8 P. D. 79 ; 46 J. P. 742 .'.'.. 846 

Deane B. Packwood (1846), 4 D. & L. 395, n. (*) 9U9 

Dear v. Knight (1869), 1 F. jfe P. 433 ......'. 938 

Debenham v. Mellon (1880), 6 App. Cas. 24 ; 50 L. J. Q. B. 155 ; 43 L. T. 

673 ; 29 W. R. 141 ; 45 J. P. 252 166 

De Biel v. Thomson (1844), 3 Beav. 475 .' 680 

De Bode, Baron, Case of (1845), 8 Q. B. 245 444, 936 

De Caen, General, The (1855), Swa. 9 '. . . '173 

Decamp v. Archibald (1893), 40 Am. St. R. 622 .'!!'..'.' 246 

De Cosse Brissao v. Rathbone (1863), 6 H. & N". 301 ; 30 L. J. Ex. 238 . . 1154 

Deeble v. Lineham (1860), 12 Ir. C. L. R. 1 125 

Defreeze v. Trumper (1806), 1 Johns. 274 ','/.', 775 

Defries». Davis (1835), 7 0. & P. 112 245 

De Gaminde v. Pigou (1812), 4 Taunt. 246 !."'.!.'!.'."!! 642 

De Grave v. May. of Monmouth (1830), 4 C. & P. Ill 640 644 

Delamere, Ld. v. The Queen (1867), L. R. 2 H. L. 419; 36 L. j. Q B ' 

313 : 17 L. T. 1 gS 

Delamotte v. Lane (1840), 9 C. & P. 261 231 

Delaney v. Fox (1857), 2 C. B. K. S. 768 ; 26 L. J. C. F. Hs ".'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' 97 

Delame v. Church (1833), 2 L. J. Ch. 113 \ 123 

De la Rue v. Dickenson (1857), 7 E. & B. 738 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 841 47 

De la SauBsaye, Re (1873), L. R. 3 P. & D. 42 ; 42 L. J. P. & M. 47 '• 28 

L. T. 368 ; 21 W. R. 549 705 

Delegalw. Highley (1837), 8 C. & P. 444; 5 Scott, 154; 3 Bing. N.'c'. 

950 ; 3 Hodges, 158 244 

Delesline ». Greenland (1795), 1 Bay, 458 '.'.'.'.'. 499 

Delhasse, Ex parte. Re Megevand (1867), 7 Ch. D. 611 ; 47 L. J. Bk'.'es' 

38 L. T. 106 ; 26 W. R. 338 159 

De L'Isle, Peer. (1826), House of Lords Minutes of Evidence, 12 ...'.'!.' i * 1167 

Delmege v. MulUns (1876), 9 Ir. R. C. L 209 98 

DelognyB. Eentoul (1812), 2 Mart. 175 '*"' 616 

De Medina v. Norman (1842), 9 M. & "W. 827 ; 2 D. N. S. 239 ; 11 l' J 

Ex. 320 774 

De Medina v. Owen (1850), 3 C. & K. 77 '.'.'.'.'. 484 

De Mora v. Concha (1885), 29 Ch. D. 281 ; 64 L. J. Ch. 632 ; 52 l' "t 
282; 33W. R. 846 .' mg 

Vol. I. enda with page 635. 



Ixiv TABLE OF CASES CfTED. 

FAQB 

Bempsey v. Lawson (1877), L. R. 2 P. D. 98 ; 46 L. J. P. 23 ; 36 L. T. 

516 ; 25 W. R. 629 704 

Dent-. Clark (182H), 5 Halst. 217 1102 

Deu V. Fulford (1761), 2 Burr. 1179 1015 

Llenoli V. Bench (1878), 46 L. J. P. D. & A. 13 ; 2 P. Dir. 60 ; 25 W. R. 

414 142, 747 

Bendy v. NioboU (185S), 4 C. B. N. S. 376 ; 27 L. J. C. P. 220 622 

Bendy f. Simpson (1856), 18 C. B. 831; 2 Jur. N. S. 642 233 

BeniBon v. Biteher (18o7), Beane & Swabey, Eco. R. 334 77 

Benn v. Spray (1786) 1 T. R. 466 395 

Benn». White (1797), 7 T. R. 112 504 

Benn». ■Wilford(1826), 1 C. &P. 284; Ry. &M. 88 787 

Bennett v. Crocker (1832), 8 Greenl. 239 288 

Bent V. Bennett (1858), 4 Myl. & Cr. 269 136 

Be Pontes v. Kendall (1862), 31 L. J. Ch. 185 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 323 ; 10 W. R. 

69 ; 6 L. T. 516 ; 30 Beav. 572 702 

Be Praslin, Buc, case of. Law Review, Art. 7 (No. xiii.) 574 

Berhy, Ld., case of (1592), Littleton, R. 370 170 

Berinzy «. Turner (1851), llr. Ch. R. 341 698 

Berisley ». Custance (1790), 4 T. R. 75 663 

Be Roo V. Foster (1862), 12 C. B. N. S. 272 641 

Be Roos Peer. (1804-5), 2 Cooper, 542 422, 423, 424, 427, 1166 

Be Rosaz Francois, In re Goods of (1877), 46 L. J. P. & M. 6 ; 2 P. B. 

56 ; 36 L. T. 263 ; 25 W. R. 362 795 

Be Rutzen, Baron, v. Farr (1835), 4 A. & E. 63 ; 5 N. & M. 617 ; 1 H. & 

W. 735 442 

Desborough v. Rawlins (1838), 3 Myl. & Cr. 515 ; 7 L. J. Ch. 171 ; 2 Jur. 

125 593, 606, 608 

Besbrow v. Wetherley (1834), 1 M. & Rob. 438 ; 6 C. & P. 768 1194 

Bespaui). Swindler (18-25), 3 Mai-t. N. S. 705 20 

Bessau v. Lewin (1887), 52 L. T. 609 912 

Be Thoren v. Att.-G-eu. (1876), 1 App. Ca^. 686 149 

BevalaProT. Gold Min. Co., Re (1883), 22 Ch. Biv. 593; 52 L. J. Ch. 

434 ; 48 L. T. 259 ; 31 W. R. 425 388 

Be Vaux V. Steinkeller (1839), 6 Bing. N. C. 84 ; 8 Scott, 202 ; 8 B. P. C. ' 

33 ; 3 Jur. 1053 719 

Be Visme, In re (1864), 2 Be G. J. & S. 17 ; 33 L. J. Ch. 332 666 

BcTon Peer. (1832). Report by Nicolas, App. 44, 46 423 

Bevon Witches (1682), 8 How. St. Tr. 1017, 1037 657 

Devonshire, Buke of, v. Neill (1877), 2 Ir. L. R. 132, 146; 8 App. Cas. 

147 42, 296, 396,403, 405, 407, 411, 425, 791, 1007 

Devoy v. Bevoy (1858), 2 Sm. & G. 403: 3 Jur. N. S. 79 ; 26 L. J. Ch. 290 666 

Bewdney v. Palmer (1839), 4 M. & W. 664 ; 7 Bowl. 177 ; 8 L. J. Ex. 148 . . 909 

Be Whelpdale v. Milburn (1818), 5 Price, 486 510, 561 

Bews V. Ryley (1851), 2 L. M. & P. 644 ; U C. B. 434 ; 20 L. J. C. P. 264 ; 

15 Jur. 1169 1023 

Dexter v. Hayes (see Hayes v. Bexter). 

Deybel's case (1821), 4 B. & Aid. 243 17 

Diana, The (18p3), 6 C. Rob. (Adm.) 60 179 

Diane, The (1840), 1 W. Rob. 131 ; 4 Moo. P. C. 11 178 

Dicas V. Lawson (1835), 1 C. M. & R. 934 ; 3 Bowl. 427 ; 5 Tyr. 235 ; 4 

L. J. Ex. 80 832 

Bickenson v. Biokenson. (1814), 2 Phillim. Ecc. R. 173 693 

Bickenson v. Teasdale (1862), 1 De G. J. & S. 52 ; 32 L. J. Ch. 37 ; 9 Jur. 

N. S. 237 ; 7 L. T. 655 449 

Diokins, Re (1842), 3 Curt. 60 701 

Dickinson v. Coward (1818), 1 B. & Aid. 677 518, 519 

Dickinson v. Fletcher (1874), 43 L. J. M. C. 25 ; L. R. 9 C. P. 1 ; 29 L. T. 

540 107 

Dickinson ». Hatfield (1831), 5 C. & P. 46; 1 M. & Rob. 141 713 

Bickinaon v. Shee (1801), 4 Esp. 67 945 

Bickinaon v. Stidolph (1861), 11 C. B. N. S. 341, 357 143, 701 705 

Bickinaon v. Swatman (1861), 4 S. & T. 206 ; 30 L. J. P. & M. 84 703 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Ixv 

JJiofanaon v. Valpy (1829), 10 B. & C. 128 ; 5 M. & R. 126 160, 540 

Dicks V. Brooks (1880), 15 Ch. D. 22 ; 49 L. J. Oh. 812 : 43 L. T. 71 ; 29 

^W.R.87 : :... 1234 

Dickson ». Evans (1794), 6 T. E. 80; 3 R. R. 119 266 

Dickson v. E. of Wilton (1859), 1 F. & P. 425 619 

Digby V. Atkinson (1815), 4 Gamp. 275 ; 16 R. R. 792 169 

Dis'gle V. Higgs (1877), 2 Ex. D. 422 ; 46 L. J. Ex. 721 : 37 L. T. 27 : 

25 W. R. 777 620 

Diggle V. Loud, and Blaokwall Ry. Co. (1850), 5 Ex. 442 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 

308 ; 14 Jur. 937 642, 645 

Dilkes, Re (1874), L. R. 3 P. & D. 166 ; 43 L. J. P. & M. 38 : 30 L. T. 

305 ; 22 W. R. 456 699 

Dill V. People (1894), 41 Am. St. R. 264 '.'.'.'.'.Add'. [893] 

Dilley v. Matthews (1863), 2 New R. 80 ; 11 W. R. 614 ; 8 L. T. 762 797 

Dimsdale v. Dimsdale (1856), 25 L. J. Ch. 806 ; 3 Drew. 656 136 

Dinmore, Re (1863), 2 Roberts. 641 696 

Dinnt). Blake (1875), 44 L.J. C. P. 276; L. R. IOC. P. 388 ; 32L.T.489.. 1160 
Dinomoyi Debi v. Roy Luchmissut Singh (1879), L. R. 7 lud. App. 8 . . . . 490 
Di Sora, Duch., v. PhUHpps (1864), 2 New R. 553 ; 10 H. L. Cas. 624 ; 33 

L. J. Ch. 129 937 

D'Israeli v. Jowett (1795), 1 Esp. 427 .'.*." 1049, 1172 

Ditcham v. Worral (1880), 5 C. P. D. 410 ; 49 L. J. C. P. 688 ; 43 L. T. 

286 ; 29 W. R. 59 ; 44 J. P. 799 718 

Ditohbum v. Goldsmith (1815), 4 Camp. 152 '..'.'.'. 620 

Ditcher v. Denison (1857), 11 Moore, P. C. C. 324 77 

Ditcher v. Eenriok (1824), 1 C. & P. 161 3'21, 698 

DivoU V. Leadbetter (1826), 4 Pick. 220 520 889 

Dix V. Otis (1827), 5 Pick. 38 '757 

Dix V. Reed (1823), 1 S. & S. 239 I44 

Dixon I'. Birch (1872), L. R. 8 Ex. 135 ; 42 L. J. Ex. 135 ;' 28 L.T.360 : 

21 W. R. 443 ' 162 

Dixon V. Cock (undated), Ridg. L. & S. 79 .'."..*!!!!.".'!!'.!.'! 1 1 03 

Dixon V. Hamoud (ISloV 2 B. & Aid. 310 '5'4'4, 545 

Dixon V. Lee (1834), 1 C. M. & R. 645 ; 5 Tyr. 180 ; 3 Dowl. P. C. 259. . ' 831 
Dixon V. Mucklestone (1872), L. R. 8 Ch. 155 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 210 ; 27 L T 

804; 21-W.R.178 539 

Dixon V. Sinclear (1832), 4 Verm. 354 II39 

Dixon V. Vale (1821), 1 C. & P. 278 '. 970 

Dixon V. White (1883), 8 App. Cas. 833 .................'. 114 

Dobell V. Hutchinson (1835), 3 A. & E. 371 ; 1 H. & W. 394 ; 5 N.' & M. 

251 671, 672 

Dobell V. Stephens (1825), 3 B. & C. 623 ; 5 D. & R. 490 747 

Dobree v. Eastwood (1827), 3 C. & P. 250 "32 48 155 

Dobson t>. Bell (1676), 2 Lev. 176 ," ' ' 19 

Dobson*. Collis (1856), 1 H. &N. 81 ; 25 L. J. Ex. 267 '. .' 681 

Dodd V. Acklom (1843), 6 M. & Gr. 672 ; 7 Scott, N. R. 415 ; 7 Jur.'ioi?'; 

13L.J C.P. 11 660,662 

Dodd V. Norns (1814), 3 Camp. 620 ; 14 R. R. 832 253, 256, 9.)1, 967 

Doddington's case (1594), 2 Co. Rep. 33 92 

Dodds V. Freke (Tuke) (1884), 26 Ch. D. 617 ; 53 L.' J. Ch! '598;" Vo'l.'t. 

320 ; 32 W. R. 424 473 

Dodge !). Meech (1828), 1 Hagg. Ecc. 620 ...'..'..'.'.'....'.'.'.'..'...'..." 140 
Dodsley v. Varley (1840), 12 A. & E. 632 ; 4 P. & D. 448 ; 5 Jur.'sie.'!!". 690 

Dodson V. Mackey (1834), 8 A. & E. 225 n. ; 4 N. & M. 327 711 

Doe 41. Allen (1799), 8 T. R. 147, 497 747 

Doe i>. Allen (1810), 3 Taun. 78 ; 12 R. R. 597 '. . 622, 623 524 

Doe V. Allen (1840), 12 A. & E. 461 ; 4 P. & D. 220 793 794 

Doe V. Andrews (1778), 2 Cowp. 846 ; cited 1 Myl. & K. 108 . . . .610,611' 816 

Doe V. Andrews (1850), 16 Q. B. 766 •. 171 1049 

Doe«). Arkwright (1833), 5 C. & P. 575 .377 446 1173 

Doe f. Ashley (1847), 10 Q. B. 663 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 356 803,' 1050 

Doe V. Askew (1809), 10 East, 620 ; 10 R. R. 366 1050 



Vol. 1. ends with page 635. 



Ixvi TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOB 

Doet'. Austin (1832), 9 Bing. 41 ; 2 Moo. & So. 107 443, 510 

Doe (;. Barnard (1849), 13 Q. B. 945 118 

Does. Barnes (1834), 1 M. & Bob. 386 1049, 1054, 1170 

Doe V. Barnes (1846), 8 Q. B. 1037 148, 269 

Doe V. Barton (1827), 2 M. & Bob. 28 412 

Doe V. Barton (1840), 11 A. & E. 311 ; 3 P. & D. 194 ; 4 Jiir. 432 . .96, 98, 99 
Doe V. Batten (1775), 1 Cowp. 243 ; 9 East, 314, n. ; 9 E.. R. 570. n. . .39, 522 
Doe V. Baytup (1835), 2 N. & M. 837 ; 3 A. & E. 188 ; 1 H & W. 270 . . 97 

Doe V. Beckett (1843), 4 Q. B. 601 ; 12 L. J. Q. B. 236 721 

Doe V. Bell (1793), 6 T. K. 471 ; 2 R. R. 642 654 

Doe V. Benjamin (1839), 9 A. & E. 644 1231 

Doe V. Benson (1821), 4 B. & Aid. 688 766 

Doe i: Beviss (1849), 18 L. J. C. P. 128 ; 7 C. B. 456 441, 457, 791, 1231 

Doe V. Beynon (1840), 12 A. & E. 431 ; 4 P. & D. 193 87, 788 

Doe V. Biggs (1809), 1 Taun. 367 ; 2 Taun. 107 ; U E. R. 533 624 

Doe V. Bingham (1821), 4 B. & Aid. 672 1202 

Doe V. Birch (1836), 1 M. & W. 402 ; 1 T. & Gr. 769 ; 5 L. J. Ex. 185 . . 622 

Doe V. Birchmore (1839), 1 P. & D. 448 ; 9 A. & E. 662 97 

Doe V. Bird (1835), 7 C. & P. 6 605 

Doe V. Bold (1847), 11 Q. B. 127 ; 12 Jur. 360 643 

Doe V. Bower (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 469 803, 804 

Doeff. Bo-wer (1851), 16 Q. B. 806 273 

Doe V. Brawn (1821), 5 B. & A. 243 148 

Doe j;. Bray (1828), M. & M. 166; 3 M. & R. 428 ; 8B. &C. 813 ....270, 1049 

Doe V. Brayne (1848), 5 C. B. 655 ; 17 L. J. C. P. 127 269, 272 

Doe V. Bridges (1831), 1 B. & Ad. 847 658 

Doe V. Brown (1837), 7 A. & E. 447 99 

Doe». Burdett (1836), 4 A. & E. 19; 6 N. & M. 259 86, 134 

Doe V. Burt (1787), 1 T. E. 701 ; 1 R. R. 367 786, 787 

Doe V. Burton (1840), 9 C. & P. 254 438 

Doe«). Calvert (1810), 2 Camp. 388; 11 R. R. 745 622, 624, 1161 

Doe J). Caperton (1839), 9C. &P. 116 19, 1213 

Doe V. Carpenter (1850), 16 Q. B. 181 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 70 800 

Doe V. Cartwright (1820), 3 B. & Aid. 326 288 

Doe V. Cartwright (1824), R. & M. 62 ; 1 C. & P. 218 1050, 1173 

Doev. Catomore (1851), 16 Q. B. 746; 20 L. J. Q. B. 728 142, 1192 

Doev. ChaUis (1851), 17 Q. B. 166 1113 

Doe V. Chambers (1836), 4 A. & E. 410 ; 6 N. & M. 639 1214 

Deed. Child*. Roe (1852), 1 E. & B. 279; 22 L. J. Q. B. 102; 17 Jur. 136 607 

Doe V. M. of Cleveland (1829), 9 B. & C. 864 119, 1211 

Doe*. Clifford (1847), 2 0. & Kir. 448 ..'. 296, 320, 321 

Doe V. Coekell (1834), 6 0. & P. 527 1191 

Doe V. Colcombe (1841), C. & Marsh. 155 441 

Doef. Cole (1834), 6 C. & P. 360 ; 308, 610 

Doe V. Cooke (1829), 6 Bing. 180 126 

Doe V. Cooke (1831), 7 Bing. 346 ; 6 M. & P. 181 118 

Doe V. Corbett (1813), 3 Camp. 368 269 

Doe ». Coulthred (1837), 7 A. & E. 235 116, 444 

Doe V. Courtenay (1848), 11 Q,. B. 702 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 161 658 

Does. Cox (1790), 6 C. & P. 743, n 918 

Doe V. Crago (1848), 6 0. B. 90 ; 17 L. J. C. P. 263 162 

Doe V. Cranstoun (1840), 7 M. & W. 1 801 

Doe V. Date (1842), 3 Q. B. 609 322, 600, 969, 970, 979, 987 

Doe V. Davies (1795), 1 Esp. 461 ; 5 R. R. 745 116 

Doe V. Davies (1837), 2 M. & W. 503 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 176 119 

Doe V. Davies (1847), 10 Q. B. 314 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 218 ..26, 27, 171, 409, 414, 

697, 1227 

Doe V. Deakin (1828), 3 C. & P. 402 ; 8 B. & C. 22 170, 172 

V>oev. Derby, E. of (1834), 1 A. & E. 790 326, 327, 1112, 1114 

Doe d. Devine v. Wilson (1855), 10 Moore, P. C. R. 527 123, 1224 

Doe V. Dumford (1813), 2 M. & Sel. 62 1207 

Doef. Dyeball (1829), 3C. &P. 610; M. & M. 346 118 

Doe«. Edmonds (1840), 6 M. & W. 302 44, 721 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OP CASES CITED. Ixvii 

FAQH 

Doe». Edwards (1834), 1 M. & Rob. 321 192 

Doe V. Edwards (1839), 1 P. & D. 408 ; 9 A. & E. 554 8,9 

Does. Ld. Egremont (1841), 2 11. & Rob. 386 969, 970 

Does. Errington (1834), 1 A. &E. 760; 3N. &M. 646; 1 M. &Rob. 344 n. 194 
Doe V. Errlngton (1840), 6 Bing. N. C. 79 ; 8 Seott, 210 ; 3 Jur. 1126. .95, 1109 

Doe V. Evans (1827), 3 0. &. P. 219 329 

Doe V. Evans (1832), 1 C. & M. 42 ; 3 Tyr, 56 701 

Doe V. Eyre (1851), 17 Q. B. 366 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 431 ; 15 Jur. 1031 75 

Doe V. Fleming (1827), 4 Bing. 266 149, 373 

Doe V. Ford (1835), 3 A. & E. 649 ; 4 L. J. (N. S.) K. B. 268 : 5 N. & M. 

209 90, 91, 747 

Doe B. Forster (1811), 13 East, 405 ; 12 R. R. 383 524 

Does. Porwood (1842), 3 Q. B. 627 ; 11 L. J. Q. B. 321 658 

Doe V. Foster (1834), 1 A. & E. 791, n. (S) 326 

Doef. Fowler (1850), 19 L.J. Q. B. 15; 14 Q. B. 700 430 

Doe V. Francis (1837), 2 M. & Rob. 57 99 

Doe V. Frankis (1840), 11 A. & E. 795 ; 3 P. & D. 565 526, 529 

Doe V. Galloway (1833), 5 B. & Ad. 43 ; 2 N. & M. 240 800, 801 

Doe V. Gardiner (1852), 12 C. B. 319 ; 21 L. J. C. P. 222 119 

Doe V. Gatacre (1838), 8 C. & P. 578 1047 

Doe V. Gladwin (1845), 6 Q. B. 953 ; 14 L. J. Q,. B. 189 522, 544, 750 

Doe V. Glenn (1834), 1 A. & E. 49 ; 3 N. & M. 837 92 

Doe V. Gore (1837), 2 M. & W. 321 1039 

Doe ». Gosley (1839), 2 M. & Rob. 243 ; 9 C. & P. 46 274 

Doe V. Green (1820), Gow, R. 227 446 

Doe ». Grey (1816), 1 Stark. 284 319 

Boev. Griffin (1812), 16 East, 293; 13 R. R. 474 171, 416 

Doe V. Groves (1847), 10 Q. B. 486 ; 11 Jur. 558 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 297 542 

Doe«. Gunning (1837), 3N. &P. 260; 7A. &E. 240; W. W. & D. 460.. 1046 

Doe V. Gwillim (1833), 5 B. & Ad. 129 788 

Doe*. Hall (1812), 16 East, 208 1169 

Does. Hanipson(1847), 4C. B. 267; 17 L. J. C. P. 226 112 

Doe V. Hardy (1836), 1 M. & Rob. 625 747 

Doe V. Hares (1833), 4 B. & Ad. 440 ; 1 N. & M. 237 91 

Doe V. Harris (1833), 5 C. & P, 592 592 

Doe V. Harris (1837), 6 A. & E. 215 ; 1 N. & P. 405 653 

Doev. Harris (1838), 8 A. & B. 12 706 

Doei). Harvey (1825), Ry. & M. 297 415 

Doe V. Harvey (1832), 8 Bing. 239 ; 1 Moo. & So. 374 286, 288 

Doe ». Hawkins (1841), 2 Q. B. 212; 1G.&D.551; 6Jur.216; 10 L. J. 

Q. B. 285 387, 442 

Doe d. Hearle v. Hicks (1831-2), 9 Dowl. & R. 15 704 

Doe V. Hemming (1826), 9 Dowl. & R. 16 ; 1211 

Doe V. M. of Hertford (1850), 19 L. J. Q. B. 526 603, 606 

Doe V. Hicks (undated), cited Doe v. Walker, 4 Er-p. 50 ; Bull. N. P. 286 

(nom. Goodright v. Hinks) 252, 253 

Does). Hilder (1819), 2 B. & Aid. 790, 793 5, 126 

Doe V. Hirst (1821), 3 Stark. 60 1198 

Doe V. Hiscocks (1839), 5 M. & W. 369 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 27 744, 784, 793, 794, 

796, 797, 798, 7S9, 802, 804, 805 
Doe V. Hodgson (1840), 12 A. & E. 135 ; 2 M. & Rob. 283 ; 4 P. & D. 142 ; 

4 Jur. 1202 1192 

Doe V. Holtom (1832), 4 A. & E. 76 760 

Doe V. Home (1843), 3 Q. B. 757, 766, 767 ; 3 G. & D. 239 ; 12 L. J. 

Q. B. 721 ; 7 Jur. 38 91 

Doe V. Howell (1840), 12 A. & E. 696 734 

Doe V. Howells (1832), 2 B. & Ad. 747 91 

Doe ». Hubbard (1850), 16 Q. B. 227 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 61 789, 794, 800 

Doe V. Huddart (1836), 2 0. M. & R. 316 ; 5 Tyr. 846 ; 1 Gale, 260 ; 

4 Dowl. 437 89, 1113 

Doe V. Huthwaite (1820), 2 M. & Rob. 48 798 

Doe V. James (1837), 2 M. & Rob. 47 321, 322, 591 

Doe V. Jauncey (1837), 8 C. & P. 101 599 

Vol, J. ends with page 635. 



Ixviii TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAGB 

Doe!). Ld. Jersey (1825), 1 B. & Aid. 550 786 

Boev. Jesson (1805), 6 East, 85 172 

Doe V. Johnson (1819), Gov, N. P. 173 117 

Doe V. Johnson (1844), 7 M. & Gr. 1047 ; 8 Scott, N. R. 761 ; 14 L. J. 

0. P. 17 259 

Doe 1). Johnston (1825), McCl. & T. 141 662 

Doev. Jones (1808), 1 Camp. 367 444, 445, 510 

Doe V. Jones (1842), 9 M. & W. 372 ; 1 Dowl. N. 8. 352 664 

Doe ». Jones (1846), 15 K. & W. 580 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 58 116 

Doe V. Jones (1849), 13 Q. B. 774 ; 18 L. J. Q. B. 260 127 

Doet!. Jones (1850), 5 Ex. 498 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 405 622 

Doe V. Keeling (1848), 11 Q. B. 889 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 199 ; 12 Jur. 433 . . 26, 

305, 432 

Doe ». Kemp (1831), 7 Bing. 336 26, 112,233, 234 

Doe V. Kemp (1835), 2 Bing. N. 0. 102 ; 2 Soott, 9 112 

Doe«!. Kilner(1826), 2 C. & P. 289 297, 1054 

Doe«;. Kingston (1841), 1 Dowl. N. S. 203 734 

Doef. Knight (1826), 8 D. & R. 348 ; 5 B. & C. 471 1204 

Doef. Lakin (1836), 7 0. & P. 481 1168 

Doe 1). Laming (1814), 4 Camp. 76 ; 15 E. R 728 162 

Doe V. Langdon (1848), 12 Q. B. 711 ; 18 L. J Q. B. 17 ; 13 Jur. 96. .98, 127, 

321, 322, 598 

Doe V. Langfield (1847), 16 M. & W. 497 294, 443, 444, 454 

Doe V. Lea (1809), 11 East, 312 766 

Doe V. Leach (1841), 3 M. & Gr. 230 ; 10 L. J. C. P. 289 192 

Doe V. Lewis (1836), 7 C. & P. 574 134 

Doe V. Lewis (1843), 1 0. & K. 122 269 

Doe V. Litherland (1836), 6 N. & M. 313 ; 4 A. & E. 784 611 

Doe V. Lloyd (1806), Pea. Bv. App. 41 126 

Doe V. Lloyd (1839), 6 Bing. N. C. 741 ; 8 Soott, 93 ; 3 Jur. 751 89, 1214 

Doe V. Lloyd (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 685 ; 1 Scott, N. S. 605 ; 10 L. J. C. P. 

128 21, 1081, 1083 

Doe V. Look (1835), 4 N. & M. 807 ; 2 A. & E. 705 638 

Doe V. Long (1841), 9 C. & P. 777 193 

Doe V. Lyne (1822), cited 2 Ph. Ev. 258, n. 1 1227 

Doe «. Manifold (1814), 1 M. & Sel. 294 141 

Doe V. Martin (1832), 1 M. & Rob. 212 312 

Doe«>. Martin (1833), 4 B. & Ad. 771, 785; 1 N. & M. 512 784, 786, 788 

Doe V. Mason (1793), 1 Esp. 63 9 

DoetJ. Massey (1851), 17 Q. B. 373; 20 L. J. Q. B. 434 ; 15 Jur. 1031. .76, 116 

Doe 4!. Mee (1833), 4 B. & Ad. 617 1169 

Doe». Mew (1837), 7 A. & E. 240 1046 

Doe«. Michael (1851), 17 Q. B. 276 171, 443 

Doe V. Millett (1848), 11 Q. B. 1036 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 202 125, 434 

Doe V. Mills (1835), 2 A. & K. 17 ; 1 M. & Rob. 385 97, 99 

Doe V. Milward (1838), 3 M. & W. 328 ; 1 H. & H. 79 ; 7 L. J. Ex. 67. . 660 

Doe V. Mobbs (1841), Car. & M. 1 442 

Doe V. Moflfatt (1860), 15 Q. B. 267 ; 19 L. J. Q. B. 438; 14 Jur. 936. .648, 655 

Doe V. Morgan (1832), 1 C. & M. 236 793 

Doe V. Morris (1835), 3 A. & E. 46 ; 4 N. & M. 698 319 

Doe V. Morris (1810), 12 East, 237 ; 2 Taun. 62 287 

Doe V. Mostyn (1862), 12 C. B. 268 ; 21 L. J. C. P. 178 1039 

Doe V. Movdsdale (1847), 16 M. & W. 689 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 169 127 

Doeji. MulUner (1796), 1 Esp. 460; 5 R. R. 746 116 

Doe V. Murless (1817), 6 M. & Sel. 110 1166, 1166 

Doe V. Murrell (1837), 8 C. & P. 134 116 

Doe V. Keeds (1836), 2 M. & W. 129 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 59 793 

Doe ». Nepeau (1833), 5 B. & Ad. 86 173, 174 

Doe V. Olley (1840), 12 A. & E. 481 ; 4 P. & D. 275 ; 4 Jur. 1084 1169 

Doei). Owen (1837), 8 0. & P. 110 320 

Doe V. Palmer (1851), 16 Q. B. 747 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 367 ; 16 Jur. 836. .142, 747 

Doe*. Passingham (1826), 2 C. & P. 444 433 

Doe t>. Paul (1829), 3 0. & P. 613 1216 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Ixix 

PAGE 

Doe V. Pearce (1839), 2 M. & Eob. 240 431 

Doe V. Pearsey (1827), 7 B. & C. 304 ; 9 D. & E. 908 112 

Doe V. Peek (1830), 1 B. & Ad. 428 622 

Doe V. Pegge (1787), 1 T. R. 760 96 

Doe V. Pembroke (1809), 11 East, 504 ; 11 E. E. 260 424 

Doe». Penfold (1838), 8 C. & P. 537 116, 1208 

Doe V. Perkes (1820), 3 B. & A. 489 706 

Doe V. Perkins (1790), 3 T. E. 749 923, 924 

Doe ». Perratt (1843), 6 M. & Gr. 343 741 

Doe v. Pettett (1R21), 5 B. & A. 223 443, 444, 510 

Doe «. Phillips (1845), 8 Q. B. 158 ; 16 L. J. Q B. 269 429 

Doe V. Plowman (1819), 2 B. & Ad. 577 5 

Doe V. Poole (1848), 11 Q. B. 713 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 143 ; 12 Jur. 450 658 

Doe j;. Powell (1834), 1 A. & E. 531 ; 3 N. & M. 616 98 

Doet). Powell (1836), 7 C. & P. 617 329, 1216 

Doe V. PoweU (1852), 3 0. & K. 323 326 

Doe V. Price (1847), 16 M. & W. 603 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 159 ; 11 Jur. 131 127 

Doe V. Pulman (1842), 3 Q. B. 622 ; 6 Jur. 1122 ; 11 L. J. Q. B. 319. . 301, 433 

Doe V. Pye (1795), 1 Esp. 366 623 

Doe». EandaU (1828), 2 M. & P. 20 415, 416 

Doe *. Eees (1834), b C. & P. 610 116 

Doe V. Eees (1838), 4 Bing. N. C. 384 ; 6 Scntt, 161 ; 1 Am. 159 622 

Doe».Eliode8(1843), IIM. &W. 600; 12L. J. Ex. 382; 1 Dowl. &L. 293.. 35 

Doe V. Eiohards (1846), 2 0. & Kir. 216 606 

Doe V. Eiokarby (1803), 6 Esp. 4 444 

Doe ®. Eidgway (1820), 4 B. & Aid. 63 438, 464, 466 

Doe ». Eies (1832), 8 Bin?. 178 ; 1 Moo. & So. 259 318 

Doe i;. Eoberts (1819), 3 B. & Aid. 367 90, 367, 1133 

Doe V. Eoberts (1844), 13 M. & "W. 520, 633 1040, 1054 

Doe V. Eoberts (1847), 16 M. & W. 778 390, 488 

Doe V. Eobson (1812), 15 East, 32 ; 13 E. E. 361 439 

Doe V. Eoe (1826), 5 Dowl. 420 644 

Doe V. EoUings (1847), 4 C. B. 188 ; 17 L. J. C. P. 268 605 

Doe V. Eoss (1840), 7 M. & W. 102 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 201 . .300, 320, 321, 356, 357 

Doei). Eosser (1802), 3 East, 15 1160 

Doe V. Eouse (1848), 5 C. B. 422 : 17 L. J. C. P. 108 797 

Doe V. Eowe (1825), 2 C. & P. 246 ; E. & M. 343 644 

Boev. Eowlands (1840), 9 C..& P. 734 248, 259, 273 

Doe v. Samples (1838), 8 A. & E. 151 ; 1 W. "W. & H. 228 ; 2 Jur. 841 ; 

3 N. & P. 254 87, 429, 431 

Doe ». Scudamore (1705), 2 Ld. Eaym. 1025 6 

Doei;. Seaton (1834), 2 A. & E. 178 1050 

Doe V. Seaton (1835), 2 C. M. & E. 732 ; 1 Tyr. & Gr. 19 ; 1 Gale, 303 . . 89, 

96, 98, 510, 602, 1113, 1173 

Doe V. Sisson (1810). 12 East, 62 231, 396 

Doe V. Skinner (1848), 3 Ex. 84 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 107 403, 455, 457 

Doe V. Sleeman (1846), 9 Q. B. 298 ; 15 L. J. Q. B. 338 ; 10 Jur. 668 397 

Doe V. Smaridge (1845), 7 Q. B. 957 ; 14 L. J. Q. B. 327 ; 9 Jur. 781 ... . 152 

Doe V. Smart (1835), 1 M. & Eob. 47^ 268 

Doe V. Smith (1838), 8 A. & E. 256 ; 3 N. & P. 335 ; 2 M. & Eob. 7 ; 

IW. W. &H. 429; 2 Jur. 854 474, 475 

Doe V. Smith (1817), 2 Stark. 199; 19 E. E. 702 1166 

Doe d. Smith v. Jersey (1819), 1 B. & B. 97, 160 ; 2 B. & P. 692 39 

Doe V. Lady Smythe (1815), 4 M. & Sel. 348 ; 16 E. E. 486 97 

Doe V. Suowdon (1769), 2 W. Bl. 1224 36 

Doe V. Somerton (1845), 7 Q. B. 58 ; 14 L. J. Q. B. 210 ; 9 Jur. 775 .... 317 

Doe V. Spence (1805), 6 East, 123 ; 2 Smith, 255 ; 8 E. E. 422 35 

Doei). Spitty (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 182 315, 319 

Doe V. Staoey (1833), 6 0. & P. 139 442 

Doe V. Stanion (1835), 1 M. & "W. 695; 5 L. J. Ex. 253; 1 E. & G. 1066 . . 668, 659, 773 

Doe V. Staple (1788), 2 T. E. 6«4 ; 1 E. E. 596 127 

Does. Steel (1811), 3 Camp. 115; 13 E. E. 768 661 

Doe V. Stephenson (1801), 3 Esp. 284 ; 4 Esp. 50 976 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



IxX TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAQH 

Doe »). StillweU (1838), 8 A. & E. 645 ; 3 N. & P. 701 ; 1 W. W. & H. 

532 ' 2 Jur 591 146 

Doe «!.' Stone (1846)', "s C.' B.' ivB -IS l! J.'c. P." 234 ".".'.'!!!!!!!!!.'!."!!! 552 

Doe V. Stratton (1828), 4 Bing. 446 ; 1 M. & P. 183 : 3 (J. & P. 164 655 

Doe V. Suokermore (1836), 5 A. & E. 703; 2 N. & P. 16; W. W. & D. 405.. 1220, 

1221, 1222, 1223, 1226, 1228 

Doe V. Sutton (1841), 9 C. & P. 706 644 

Doe V. Sybom-n (1796), 7 T. E. 2 ; 2 Esp. 499 ; 4 R. R. 363 . . 126, 126, 552, 1158 
Doe V. Taniere (1848), 12 Q. B. 998 ; 18 L. J. Q. B. 49 ; 13 Jur. 119 . . 152, 645 

Doe V. Tarrer (1824), Ry. & M. 141 410, 1227 

Doe d. Tatham v. Wright (1837), 2 Russ. & Mvl. 1 ; 1 A. & E. 3 ; 3 N. & M. 

260; 7A. &E. 313; 6N. &M. 132; 4 Bing. N. 0. 489 : 6L. J- Q. B. 124. .369, 

370, 371, 410 

Hoev. Taylor (1849), 1 Allen, 144 (N. Bruns.) 766 

Doe ». Thomas (1811), 14 East, 323 ; 2 Smith, L. C. 432 398 

Doe V. Thomas (1829), 9 B. & 0. 299 128, 698, 659 

Doe V. Thomson (1841), 9 Dowl. 948 816 

Doe V. Thynne (1808), 10 East, 206 ; 10 R. R. 280 443 

Doe ». Tidbury (1854), 14 C. B. 304 ; 2 C. L. R. 347 ; 23 L. J. C. P. 57 ; 

18 Jur. 468 116 

Doe d. Tindal v. Roe (18:i6), 5 Dowl. 420 476 

Doe V. Tucker (1830), M. & M. 536 269 

Doe V. Turford (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 890, 895 157, 435, 437, 454, 457, 459 

Doe !;. Tyler (1830), 6 Bing. .561 ; 4 M. & P. 377 1113 

Doev. Vowles (1833), 1 M. & Rob. 261 438 

Doe V. Wainwright (1836), 5 A. & E. 620 1211 

Doe V. Wainwright (1838), 8 A. & E. 700 444, 497 

Doe V. Walker (1801), 4 Esp. 50 ; Bull. N. P. 296 252, 253 

Doe V. Ward (1852), 18 Q. B. 197 ; 21 L. J. Q. B. 145 ; 16 Jur. 709 . . . . 704 

Doe V. Watkins (1806), 7 East, 551 ; 3 Smith, 617 ; 8 R. R. 670 35 

Doe V. Watkins (1837), 3 Bing. N. C. 421 ; 4 Scott, 165 602 

Doe V. Watson (1817), 2 Stark. 230 98 

Doet). Webber (1834), 3 N. & M. 686; 1 A. & E. 733 513, 514, 1114 

Doe f. Webster (1840), 12 A. & E. 442; 4 P. &D. 270 759 

Doe B. WeUa (1839), 10 A. & E. 435, 437 656 

Doe V. Wellsman (1848), 2 Ex. 368 ; 6 D. & L. 179 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 277 1113 

Doe V. Whitefoot (1838), 8 0. & P. 270 306 

Doe V. Whitehead (1838), 8 A. & E. 571 ; 1 W. W. & H. 521 ; 2 Jur. 493. .260, 

267, 306 

Doe V. Whitroe (1822), D. & R. N. P. C. 1 98 

Doe V. Wiggins (1843), 4 Q. B. 367, 375 ; 3 G. & D. 504 ; 7 Jur. 629 96 

Doe V. Wilford (1824), 1 C. & P. 284 ; R. & M. 88 787 

Does. WilUams (1836), 7 0. & P. 332 115, 116 

Doe V. WOson (1809). 11 East, 56 39 

Doe V. Wittcomb (1851), 4 H. L. Gas. 425 ; 6 Ex. 601 302, 403, 457, 460 

Doe V. WoUey (1829), 8 B. & C. 22 ; 2 M. & R. 195 ; 3 C. & P. 402 86, 170 

Does'. WombweU (1811), 2 Camp. 559 524 

Doe V. Wood (about 1828), 5 Bing. 439 977 

Doe V. Wood (1845), 14 M. & W. 682 ; 15 L. J. Ex. 41 ; 9 Jur. 1060 .... 660 

Doe V. Woodbridge (1829), M. & R. 302 ; 9 B & C. 376 522 

Doe V. Wright (1839), 10 A. & E. 763 . 2 P. & D. 672 89 1140 

Doef. Young (1845), 8 Q. B. 63; 15 L. J. Q. B. 9; 9 Jur. 941 ... ' 148 
Doglioni v. Crispin (1866), 35 L. J. P. & M. 129 ; L. R. 1 H. L. 301 : 15 

L. T. 44 1106, 1145 

Doherty v. Dyer (1890), 25 L. R. Ir. 297 142 

Doker t'. Hasier (1824), Ry. & M. 198 "" 591 

Dolby D. lies (1840), 11 A. & E. 335 ; 4 Jur. 432 ' "9799 

Dolderv. Bk. of England (1806), 10 Ves. 286, 352 " ' 3 

Dolder v. Ld. Huntingfield (1806), 11 Ves. 292 ; 8 R. R. 1.59 18 

Dolling i-. Evans (1867), 36L. J. Ch. 474 |" 673 

Dolphin V. Aylward (1864), 15 Ir. Ch. R. 583 UlV 1123 

Dolphin V. Robins (1859), 7 H. L. Cas. 390 ; 3 Maoq. 563 ; 29 L. J P 11 •' 
6 Jur. N. S. 1271 ; 7 W. R. 674 180, 1144 

The references are to pages, not to paragraph*. 



TABLE or CASES CITED. Ixxi 

PAOE 

Don P. Lippmann (1837), 5 a. & Fin. 1, 13—17 52, 1142, 1146, 1155 

Donatrh v. Bergiu (1842), Arm. M. & 0. 367 1023 

Donald v. duckling (1866), 3S L. J. Q. B. 2S2 ; 7 B. & S. 783 ; L. R. 

1 Q. B. 185 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 795 ; 14 L. T. 772 ; 15 W. K. 13 781 

Donaldson v. Thompson (1808), 1 Camp. 429 ; 10 R. R. 717 1143, 1149 

Dou'-aster, May. of, v. Day (1810), 3 Taun. 262 ; 12 R. R. 650 324, 353 

Donegal] v. Templemore (1858), 9 Ir. C. L. R. 374 234, 791 

Donellan v. Donellan (1795), 2 Hagg. Eoo. 144 631 

Donellani!. Read (1832), 3 B. &Ad. 905 659, 680 

Donelson v. Taylor (1829), 8 Pick. 390 909 

Don Francisco, The(1862), 1 Lush. 468 ; 31 L. J. Adm. 205 ; 6 L. T. 133 . . 1 182, 1189 

Donnlson v. Elslev (1824), 3 Eagle & Y. 1.S96, n 398 

Dooley v. Mahon"(1877), Ir. R. 11 Eq. 299 798 

Doorman v. Jenkins (1834), 2 A. & E. 256, 260 ; 4 N. & M. 170 38, 39 

Doran's case (1838), 2 Moo. C. C. 37 907 

Dore Gallery, In re, (18901, 62 L. T. 758 ; 38 W. R. 491 913 

Dorin v. Dorin (1875), L. R. 7 H. L. 668 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 652 145, 793 

Dorr V. Munsell (1816), 13 Johns. 431 746 

Dorrett v. Meux (1854), 23 L. J. 0. P, 221 ; ] 5 0. B. 142 1046, 1064 

Dorsey v. Dorsey (1838), 7 Watts, 360 1144 

Dost Aly Khan, In goods of (1880), 6 P. D. 6 ; 49 L. J. P. 78 ; 29 W. R. 80 937 
Douce, Re (1862), 2 S & T. 693; 31 L. J. P. 172; 8 Jur. N. S. 723; 6 

L. T. 789 700 

Doucet V. Geoghegan (1878), 9 Ch. D. 441 ; 26 W. R. 825 378 

Douglas, Re (1842), 3 Q. B. 837 ; 12 L. J. Q. B. 49 ; 3 G. & D. 509 ; 7 

Jur. 39 868, 870 

Douglas V. Corhett (1856), 6 E. & B. 514 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 1247 30 

Douglas V. Douglas (1871), L. R. 12 Eq. 617 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 74 ; 26 L. T. 

530 ; 20 W. R. 55 180 

Douglas V. Ewing (1857), 6 Ir. C. L. R. 395 39 

Douglasf . Fellows (1853), 1 Kay, 114; 2 W. R. 654 ; 23 L.J. Ch. 167 . . 792,798,799 

Douglas V. Forrest (1828), 4 Bing. 686 ; 1 M. & P. 663 1146 

Douglas J). Holme (1840), 12 A. &E. 641 ; 4 P. &D. 685 117 

Douglas V. Saunderson (1791), 2 Dall. 116 422 

Douglas ». Tousey (1829), 2 Wend. 362 255, 974 

Dover V. ChUd (1876), 1 Ex. Div. 172 ; 46 L. J. Ex. 462 ; 34 L. T. 737 ; 

24 W. R. 637 1159 

Dover v. Maestaer (1804), 5 Esp. 96 ; 4 Bast, 435 ; 1 Smith, 123 273 

Dowdell V. Australian Royal Mail Co. (1854), 3 E. & B. 902 ; 2 C. L. R. 

1656; 23 L. J. Q. B. 369; 18 Jur. 579 819 

Dowden v. Fowle (1814), 4 Camp. 38 496 

Dowling V. Dowling (1860), 10 Ir. C. L. R. 244 229 

Dowling ». Finigan (1824), 1 C. & P. 687 273 

Down 1). Ellis (1865), 36 Beav. 578 631 

Downest). Garbutt(1843),2Dowl.N.S. 945; 14 L. J. Q. B. 216; 9 Jur. 690 734 

Downes v. Richardson (1822), 5 B. & A. 675 ; 1 D. & R. 332 1203 

Downing v. Butcher (1841), 2 M. & Rob. 374 262 

Downing v. Capel (1867), 36 L. J. M. 0. 97 ; L. R. 2 C. P. 461 ; 16 L. T. 

323 ; 16 W. R. 746 226, 499 

Downs*. Cooper (1841), 2 a. B. 266; 1G.&D.573; IIL.J.Q.B. 2; 6 Jur. 622 98 

Dowton«!. Cross (1794), 1 Esp. IfiS 498 

Doyly's case (1830), Maoq. Prao. H. L. 654 502 

Drabble v. Donner (1824), Ry. & M. 47 ; 1 C. & P. 188 315 

Drake*. Drake (I860), 8 H.L.Cas. 172; 29 L J.Ch.850; 3L.T. 193. .797, 798,799 

Orako v. Marryat (1823), 1 B. & C. 473 ; 2 D. & R. 696 1178 

Drake*. Sykes (1797), 7 T. R. 113 496 

Dranquet *. Prudhomme (1831), 3 Louis. 83, 86 258 

Drant *. Brown (1825), 5 D. & R. 682 ; 3 B. & C. 665 288 

Drayton *. Dale (1823), 3 D. & E,. 534 ; 2 B. & C. 293 117, 646 

Dresser v. Stansfield (1845), 14 M. & W. 828 ; 15 L. J. Ex. 274 1039 

Drew V. Nunn (1879), 4 Q. B. D. 661 ; 48 L. J. Q. B. 591 ; 40 L. T. 671 ; 

27 W. R. 810 167 

Drew V. Prior (1843), 5 M. & Gr. 264 1222 

Vol, I. ends with page 635. 



Ixxii TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAQB 

Drinkwater v. Porter (1835), 7 C. & P. 181 397, 399, 402 

Droitwioh rase (1835), Knapp & 0. 64 497 

Drown v. Smith (1825), 3 New Hamp. 299 644 

Draitt's case (1872), L. B. 11 Eq. 6 845 

Drummond, Re (1880, should be 1860), 2 S. & T. 8 ; 8 W. E. 476 701 

Drummond v. Att.-Gen. (1849), 1 Dr. & War. 353 763, 784, 791 

Drummond v. Parish (1843), 3 Curt. 522, 542 702 

Drury's case (see Malone v. O'Connor), Drury (temp. Napier), 644 79 

Druryj;. Macnamara(1855),5E. &B.612; 25L.J.Q.B.5; lJur.N.S.1163 773 

Dryden v. Allix (1863). 1 Moo. P. C. N. S. 528 6 

Duane, Re (1862), 31 L. J. P. & M. 173 ; 2 S. & T. 590 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 752 ; 

6 L. T. 788 140 

Du Barre v. Livette (1791), Pea. R. 77 ; 3 B. R. 655 595, 59S 

Dublin, Abp. of v. Lord Trimleston (1849). 12 Ir. Eq. R. 251 . .1133, 1167, 1168 

DubHn, Corp. of v. Judge (1847), 11 Ir. L. R. 8 729 

Dublin, "W. & W. Ry Co. v. Slattery (1878), 3 App. Gas. 1155; 39 L. T. 

365; 27 "W. R. 191 ; 10 Ir. C. L. Rep. 256 28 

Du Bost r. Beresford (1810), 2 Camp. 512 : 11 R. R. 782 371, 374 

Duckett V. Cover (1877), 6 Ch. D. 82 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 407 ; 25 W. R. 6-54 . . 187 

Duiikett V. Williams (1851), 1 C. & J. 610 ; 1 Dowl. 291 347 

Dudgeon v. Pembroke (1877), li. R. 2 Apn. Gas. 284 ; 1 Q. B. D. 96 ; 46 

L. J. Q. B. 409 ; 36 L. T. 382 ; 25 W. B. 499 771 

Dudley »•. Sumner (1809), 5 Mass. 444 372 

Dudley v. Vose (1873) 114 Mass. 34 763 

Dufaur v. Croft (1840), 3 Moo. P. C. R. 147 140 

Dufferin's, Ld., case (18.S7), 4 CI. & Fin. 568 1093 

Duffeiiu Peer. (1848). 2 H. of L. Gas. 47 1048 

Dufan V. Smith (1792), Pea. R. 108 606 

Duffr, Re (1871), 5 Ir. B. Equity, 506 142, 747 

Dugdale V. Bobertson (1857), 3 K. & J. 695 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 687 114 

Duggins, Be (1870), 39 L. J. P. 24 ; 22 L. T. 182 701 

Duke «. Ashby (1862), 7 H. & N. 600 ; 31 L. J. Ex. 168; 8 Jur. N. S. 

236 ; 10 W. B. 273 97 

Dukes V. Gostling (1835), 1 Bing. N. C. 588 ; 1 Scott, 570 ; 1 Hodges, 120; 

4 L. J. C. P. 211 202 

Dumfries, Earl of. The (1885), 10 P. D. 31 ; 54 L. J. P. 7 ; 61 L. T. 906 ; 

33 W. B. 568 ; 6 Asp. M. C. 342 388 

Dumper v. Dumper (1862), 3 G-ifE. 583 666 

Dunboyne, Ld. v. Brander (1854), 18 Beav. 313 144 

Duncan v. Beard (1820), 2 Nott & M'C. 400 429 

Duncan v. Brady (1860), 12 Ir. C. L. B. 171 1086 

Duncan v. Hill (1871), 40 L. J. Ex. 137 ; L. B. 6 Ex. 255 ; 25 L. T. 59 ; 

19 W. R. 894 158 

Duncan v. Hodges (1827), 4 McC. 239 1206 

Duncan v. Louch (1845), 6 Q. B. 904 ; 14 L. J. Q. B. 185 ; 9 Jur. 346 207 

Duncan v. Lowndes (1813), 3 Camp. 478 ; 14 R. B. 815 161 

Duncan v. Scott (1807), 1 Camp. 100 1013, 1044 

Duncan v. Tiudal (1853), 13 C. B. 257 ; 22 L J. C. P. 137 ; 17 Jur 347. . 651 
Duncombe v Daniell (1837), 1 W. W. & H. 101 ; 2 Jur. 32 ; 8 C. & P. 222 507 

Duncuft V. Albrecht (1841), 12 Sim. 189 685 

Dundas's case (1814), Macq. H. L. Prac. 610 502 

Dundasf. Dutens (1790), IVes. jun. 199; 2 Cox, 240; IR. B. 112 679 

Dunford v. Trattles (1844), 2 M. & W. 529 ; 1 D. & L. 55i ; 13 L. J. Ex 

124 ; 8 Jur. 180 533 

Dunlop V. Higgins (1848), 1 H. of L. C. 381 ; 12 Jur. 295 155 

Dunn ». Devon, &o. Newspaper Co., (1894) 10 R. 167; (1896) 1 Q B 

211, n. ; 63 L. J. Q. B. 342; 70 L. T. 593 636 

Dunns;. Murray (1829), 4 M. &B. 571 ; 9 B. & C. 780 "" 1124 

Dunn V. Slee (1816), 1 Moore, C. P. ; Holt, N. P. 401 : 17 B. R. 651 508 

Dunuj). Snowden (1863), 32L. J. Ch. 104; 2Dr. &Sm. 201; 7 L. T 658- 

U W. B 160 173 

Dimne v. EngUsh (1874), L. R. 18 Eq. 624; 31 L.T. 75 324, 971 

Dunne v. Ferguson (1832), Hayes, 343 686 686 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Ixxiii 

„ PAQB 

DuimingD. Boterts (1862), 36 Barb. (N. T.) 463 e74 

Dimraven, Ld. v. Llewellyn (1860), 15 Q. B. 7i)l ; 19 L. J. Q. B. 3S8. .394, 396, 

397, 398, 402 

Dunsford*. Curlewis (1859), 1 P. & F. 702 26 

Danston v. Paterson (1857), 2 C. B. N. S. 495 ; 26 L. J. C. P. 267 643 

Dnpays». Shepherd (16'18), 12 Mod. 216 4 

Dupuy V. Traraan (1843), 2 T. & C. 341 .....' 927 

Durance, Ee (1872), L. R. 2 P. & D. 406; 41 L. J. P. & M. 60: 26 L. T. 

983 ; 20 "W. R. 769 703 

Durham, Lady, Re (1842), 3 Curt. 67 '..'..'. 701 

Durham, Bp. of, v. Beaumont (1808), 1 Camp. 207 464, 976, 977 

Durham andSunderl. Ry. Co. v. Walker (1842), 2 G. & D. 326; 2 Q. B. 940 638 

Darling v. Loveland (1839), 2 Curt. 226, 227 140 

Durrantn.Priend(18o7), 6 DeGr. &Sm. 343; 21 L. J. Ch. 353; 16Jur.769 174 

I Durrell v. Bederley (1816), Holt, 283 ; 17 R. R. 639 934 

Dun-ell (should be Darrell) v. Evana (1861), 1 H. & C. 174 ; 31 L. J. Ex 

337; 9 Jur. N. S. 104; 7 L. T. 97; 10 W. R. 665 297, 674 

Dutton, Re (1862), 32 L. J. P. & M. 137 ; 3 S. & T. 66 143 

Duttons. Solomonson (1803), 3 Bos. & P. 582; 7 R. R. 883 691 

Dutton V. 'Woodman (1832), 9 Cush. 255 494, 5 >6 

Dwyer 1). Collins (1852), 7 Ex. 639; 21 L. J. Ex. 225 ; 16 Jur. 569. .318, 319, 609 

Dwyer v. Rich (1871), 6 I. R. C. L. 144 Ill 

Dyoe Sombre*. Troup (1856), Deane, Eoo.R. 38; 26L.T.(O.S.)288. . 169, 170, 262 

Dye V. Dye (1884), 47 J. P. 520 666 

Dyer, Re (1828), 1 Hagg. Eoo. R. 219 693 

Dyeri;. Best (i866), L. R. 1 Ex. 152; 25 L. J. Ex. 105; 4 H. & C. 189.. 76 
DTert».Dyer(1788),lWhite&T.L.C.236; "Watk.Copyh. 214-228 (3rd ed.)..665,666 

Dyer». Green (1847), 10 L. J. Ex. 239 ; 1 Ex. 71 1206 

Dyer «-.Munday (1895), 14 R (May) 266; (1895) 1 Q. B. 742; 64L. J.Q.B. 

448; 72L.T. 448; 43 W. R. 440 Ada.ho7S'] 

Dyke v. Aldridge (1798), cited 7 T. R. 665 ; 11 East, 5s4 496 

Dykev. Williams (1861J, 2 S. & T. 491 ; 31 L. J. P. & M. 157 414, 416 

Dymooh v. Watkins (1883), 10 Q. B. D. 451 ; 31 W. R. 331 ; 48 L. T. 393 944 

Dyne!). Nutley (1853), 14 G. B. 122 801 

DyaartPeer. (1881), 6 App. Gas. 489 149 367 

Dyson v. Wood (1824), 3 B. & C. 449 1033 



Eabon ». JefEoock (1872), L. R. 7 Ex. 379 ; 42 L. J. Ex. 36 ; 28 L. T. 273 ; 

20 W. R. 1033 114 

Eads V. Williams (1854), 24 L. J. Ch. 531 ; 4 De G. M. & G. 674 1039 

Eagletons. Gutteridge (1843), 11 M. & W. 469; 12 L. J. Ex. 359; 2 

Dowl. N. S. 1053 227, 1196, 1205 

Eagleton v. King^iton (1803), 8 Ves. 438 1220, 1223 

Earner v. Merle (1802-9), cited 2 Camp. 263 255 

Earl's Trust, Re (1858), 4 K. & J. 300 9, 1030 

Earl of Auckland, The (1861), 30 L. J. P M. & A. 121 ; Lush. Adm. 164; 

15 Moo. P. C. C. 304 ; 5 L. T. 558 ; 10 W. R. 124 178 

Earl of Dumfries, The (1883), 10 P. D. 31 ; 54 L. J. P. 7 ; 61 L. T. 906 ; 

33 W. R. 568 ; 5 Asp. M. C. 342 388 

Earl V. Lewis (1801), 4 Esp. 1 432, 1168 

Earle v. Picken (1833), 5 C. & P. 542 291, 292, 655 

Earp V. Henderson (1876), 3 Ch. D. 254 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 738 ; 34 L. T. 844.. 221 

Earp V. Lloyd (1857), 3 Kay & J. 549 1 183 

East V. Chapman (1827), 2 C. & P. 570 ; M & M. 46 245, 970 

East Lond. Waterw. Co. v. Bailey (1827), 4Bing. 283 ; 12 Moo. (C. P.) 532 642 
East. Cos. Ry. Co. .-. Broom (1851), 6 Ex. 614 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 196; 6 Railw. 

Cas. 678 643 

East.UnionRy.Co.v.East.Co8.Ry.Co.(1853),2E.&B.540; 22L.J.Q.B.371 1160 
East. Union Ry. Co. v. Symonds (1850), 6 Ex. 237 ; 6 RaUw. Cas. 578. .454, 458 
Eaatland v. BurcheU (1870), 3 Q. B. D. 432 ; 47 L. J. Q. B. 500 ; 38 L. T. 

568; 27W.R.290 167 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



Ixxiv TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PASS 

Eastman v. Tuttle (1823), 1 Cowen, 248 644 

Eastmui'e v. Laws (1839), 6 Bing. N. C. 444 ; 7 Scott, 461 ; 7 Dowl. 431 ; 

2 Am. 54; 3 Jur. 460 1121 

Easton V. Carter (1860), 5 Ex. 8 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 173 1133 

Eastwood V. Eenyon (1840), 9 L. J. Q. B. 409 ; 4 Jur. 1081 ; 3 P. & D. 276 ; 

11 A. & E. 438 679 

Eastwood V. Saville (1842), 11 L. J. Ex. 383 ; 9 M. & W. 615 717 

Eaton V. Basker (1881), 6 Q. B. D. 201 ; 7 Q. B. D. 529 ; 60 L. J. Q. B. 

444 ; 44 L. T. 703 ; 29 W. E. 697 ; 45 J. P. 616 650 

Eccles V. Harrison (1848), 6 Notes of Gas. (Eco. & Mar.) 204 488 

Ecules. CommisB. v. Merral (1869), L. E. 4 Ex. 162; 38 L. J. Ex. 93 ; 17 

W. R. 676 97, 152, 644 

Eccles. Commiss. v. Eowe (1880), 6 App. Gas. 736; 4tf L. J. Q. B. 771 ; 

43 L. T. 353 ; 29 W. B. 169 ; 46 J. P. 36 74 

Ecclestont). Speke (1689), Garth. 79 ; 3 Mod. 258; Comb. 156 488,496 

Eokersley v. Piatt (1866), L. R 1 P. & D. 281 ; 36 L J. P. 7 ; 14 L. T. 

800 ; 15 L. T. 327 ; 16 W. R. 232 143, 703 

Eckstein v. Reynolds (1837), 7 A. & E. 80 ; 2 N. & P. 256 48 

Edans;. Dudfield (1841), 1 Q. B. 302, 307; 4 P. & D. 656 ; 6 Jur. 317.. 48, 691, 

717 
Eddowes v. Argentine Land Go. (1890), 59 L. J. Gh. 392 ; 62 L. T. 514 ; 

38 W. R. 629 915 

Eden v. Blake (1845), 13 M. & W. 614 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 194 ; 9 Jur. 213 746 

Edge«). Hillary (1852), 3 G. & K. 43 271 

Edge V. SaUsbury (1749), Amb. 70 789 

Edge V. Strafford (1831), 1 Tyr. 293 ; 1 C. & J. 391 682 

Edgewortb v. Johnston (1877), I. R. 11 Eq. 326 806 

Edie V. East India Go. (1761), 2 Buir. 122B ; 1 W. Bl. 295 5 

Edie V. Kingsford (1864), 14 C. B. 759 ; 2 C. L. R. 832 ; 23 L. J. C. P. 

123 286 

Edme, Ex parte (1822), 9 Serg. & R. 147 869 

Edmonds*. Ghallis (1849), 7 G.B. 413; 6 Dowl.&L. 681; 18L.J.G.P 164.. 1191 
Edmonds v. Foster (1876), 45 L. J. C. P. 41 ; 33 L. T. 690 ; 24 W. R. 

368 109, 520 

Edmonds f. Goater (1852), 15 Beav. 415; 21 L. J. Ch. 290 711 

Edmonds v. Harris (1834), 2 A. & E. 414 ; 4 N. & M. 182 222 

Edmonds v. Walter (1820), 3 Stark. 8 922 

Edmondeon v. Stevenson (1765), Bull. N. P. 8 110 

Edmunds v. Downes (1834), 2 C. & M. 459; 4 Tyr. 173 ; 3 L.J. Ex. 98 .. 673,712, 713 

Edmunds «>. Low (1857), 3 K. & J. 318; 26 L. J. Ch. 432 806 

Edmunds v. Newman (1823), R. & M. 5 506 

Edwards, Re (1848), 6 Notes of Gas. (Ecc. & Mar.) 306 701 

Edwards v. Bates (1844), 7 M. & G. 600 754 

Edwards v. Buchanan (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 788 1019, 1174 

Edwards v. Crock (1801), 4 Esp. 39 376 

Edwards v. Edwards (1836), 2 T. & C. Ex. 123 667 

Edwards v. Etherington (1825), Ry. & M. 268 774 

Edwards v. Hall (1865), 6 De G. M. & G. 74 ; 25 L. J. Gh. 82 683 

Edwards v. Havell (1853), 14 C. B. 107 ; 2 C. L. R. 1343 ; 23 L. J. C. P. 

7; 17 Jur. 1103 179 

Edwards v. Hodges (1855), 16 C. B. 477 ; 3 C. L. R. 472 ; 24 L. J. M. C. 

81 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 91 191 

Edwards v. Janes (1855), 1 Kay & J. 534 717 

Edwards v. Jevons (1849), 8 G. B. 430 ; 19 L. J. C. P. 50 786 

Edwards v. Jones (1837). 7 C. & P. 633 268 

Edwards v. Matthews (1847), 16 L. J. Ex. 291 ; 4 D. & L. 721 ; 11 Jur. 

398 272 

Edward's'^.' Midl.Ry.'Co! "(1880)," 9'q.'b'. d! '287 ;' "s'o L.' J! 'q! B." 281';' 43 

L. T. 694 ; 29 W. R. 609 ; 45 J. P. 374 643 

Edwards v. R. (1854), 9 Ex. 628 ; 23 L. J. Ex. 166 84 

Egan D. Cowan (1858), 30 L. T. 223 1224 

Egan V. Larkin (1842), 1 Arm. M. & 0. 403 26, 330, 1214 

Egerton v. Mathews (1805), 2 Smith, 389 ; 6 East, 307 ; 8 R. R. 489 . .668, 675 

T/ie references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. IxXV 

PAGE 

Egg V. Bamett (1800), 3 Esp. 196 154 

Egremont Burial Board v. Egremont Iron Ore Co. (1880), 14 Ch. D. 168 ; 

49 L. J. Ch. 623 ; 42 L T. 179 ; 28 W. R. 594 321 

Ehrenspergen v. Anderson (1842), 3 Ex. 148 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 132 315 

Eicholz V. Bannister (1864), 17 C. B. N. S. 708 ; 34 L. J. 0. P. 105 ; 11 

Jur. N. S. 15; 12L. T. 76; 13 W. E.. 96 775 

Eioke V. Nokes (1829). M. & M. 303 , 609, 713 

Elden v. Keddell (1807), 9 R. R. 404 ; 8 East, 187 1046 

Elder «. Carter (1890), 25 Q. B. D. 194; 55 L. J. Q. B. 281; 62 L. T. 

516 ; 38 W. R. 612 ; 64 J. P. 692 343 

Eldridge d. Knott (1774). 1 Cowp. 214 119, 123, 125 

Elect. Teleg. Co., Re, Ex parte Buna (1857), 24 Beav. 137 ; 26 L. J. Ch. 

614 844 

Eley V. PositiTo Govt. &c. Co. (1875), 45 L. J. Ex. 58 ; 1 Ex. D. 20 ; 33 

L. T. 143 ; 24 "W. R. 252 648, 681 

Elford V. Teed (1813), 1 M. & Sel. 28 33 

EUas V. Griffith (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 806 ; 8 Ch. D. 521 ; 38 L. T. 871 ; 26 

"W. R. 869 971 

Eliot V. Allen (1845), 1 C. B. 18 ; 14 L. J. C, P. 136 227 

Elkin V. Janson (1846), 13 M. & W. 665 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 201 ; 9 Jur. 353. . .261, 

262, 266, 267 

Elkington v. Holland (1845), 9 M. & W. 659 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 613 733 

EUenborough's, Ld., case (1830), Maoq. H. L. Praut. 655 502 

EUershaw*. Rohinson (1816-28), Stark. Ev. 641, 642 255 

EUioe, Re (1864), 33 L. J. P. & M. 27 ; 12 W. R 353 143 

EUioe V. Roupell (1863), 2 New R. 3 ; 11 W. R. 579 ; 32 L. J. Ch. 563 ; 9 

Jur. N. S. 533 353 

Elliott V. Dean (1884), C. & E. 283 673 

Elliott V. Elliott (1841), 9 M. & W. 27 ; 11 L. J. Ex. 3 47 

Elliott V. Kemp (1840), 7 M. & W. 306 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 321 116, 117 

EUiott V. North East. Ry. Co. (1863), 32 L. J. Ch. 402; 10 H. L. C. 333 ; 

8L. T. 337 114 

Elliott ». South Devon Ry. Co. (1848), 2 Ex. 725 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 262 ... , 50, 763 

EUiott V. Thomas (1838), 3 M. & W. 170 ; 7 L. J. Ex. 129 689 

ElUott ». Totnes Union (1893), 67 J. P. 151 ; 9 T. L. R. 35 373 

Ellis ». Cowne (1849), 2C. &K. 719 460 

Ellis V. DesUva (1881), 6 Q. B. D. 521; 60 L. J. Q. B. 328; 44 L. T. 209; 

29 W. R. 493 ; 42 

Ellis V. EUis (1814), 11 Mass. 92 295 

Ellis ». Houstoun (1878), 10 Ch. D. 236; 27 W. R. 501 145, 766 

Ellis V. Saltan (1808), 4 0. & P. 327, a. {a] 612 

Ellis V. Thompson (1838), 3 M. & W. 466 ; 1 H. & H. 131 164 

Elhs V. Watson (1818), 2 Stark. R. 463 ; 20 R. R. 726 495, 551 

EUison V. Ellison (1802), 6 Ves. 666 ; 6 R. R. 19 ; 1 "White & T. L. C. 291. 665 

Elimaker v. Buckley (1827), 16 Serg. & R. 77 945 

Elmore v. Kingsoote (1826), 8 Dovel. & R. 343 ; 5 B. & C. 583 671 

Elmore v. Stone (1809), 1 Taun. 458 ; 10 R. R. 578 690 

Elsamj). Faucett (1797), 2 Esp. 563.... 253, 254 

Elston V. Wood (1833), 2 My. & K. 678 496 

Elton?;. Larkins (1832), 1 M. & Rob. 196; 5 C. & P. 385 505, 954 

Elwes v. Elwes (1861), 2 GifP. 545 749 

Elwood V. Bullock (1844), 6 Q. B. 384 ; 13 L. J. Q. B. 330 1091 

Elworthy «. Sandford (1864), 34 L. J. Ex. 42 : 3 H. & C. 330 305 

Emanuel v. Eobarts (1868), 6 B. & S. 687 ; 34 L. J. Q. B. 217 546 

Embleton v. Brown (1860), 3 E. & E. 234 ; 30 L. J. M. C. 1 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 

1298 112 

Emerson v. Blonden (1794), 1 Esp. 142 : 5 R. R. 725 503 

Emery v. Barnett (1858), 27 L. J. C. P. 216 ; 4 C. B. N. S. 423 ; 4 Jur. 

N. S. 634 98 

Emery v. Chicbero (The Arklow) (1883), 63 L. J. P. C. 9; 9 App. Cas. 136 ; 

50 L. T. 306; 5 Asp. 219 177 

Emery v. Grocock (1821), 6 Madd. 54 126 

Emery v. Twombly (1840), 5 Shepl. 66 1213 

Vol, I. ends with page 635. 



Ixxvi TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOB 

Emraersonv. Heelis (1809), 2 Taun. 38; 11 R. E. 520 686, 730 

Eramerton v. Matthews (1862), 31 L. J. Ex. 139 ; 7 H. & N. 686 ; 8 Jur. 

N. S. Bl ; 5 L. T. 681 ; 10 W. E. 346 776 

Emmet v. DewWrst (1852), 21 L. J. Ch. 497 ; 3 Mac. & a. 587 ; 15 Jur. 

1115 ....:. 762 

Emmott V. Marohant, HMlkett, Claimt. (1878), 3 Q. B. D. 555 ; 38 L. T. 

608 ; 47 L. J. Q. B. 436 ; 26 "W. E. 632 1088 

Emsley, Mary, Re (1862), 2 S. & T. 491 414, 416 

Engell V. Fitch (1869), 10 B. & S. 738 ; 17 W. E. 894 ; L. R. 4 Q. B. 659 ; 

37 L. J. Q. B. 145 773 

England v. Downs (1840), 2 Beav. 523 ; 6 Beav. 269 785 

England v. Slade (1792), 4 T. R. 682 ; 2 E. E. 498 126 

English Jt. Stock Bk., Ee (1866), L. E. 3 Eq. 203 845 

English V. Tottie (1876), 1 Q. B. D. 141; 46 L. J. Q. B. 138; a3 L. T. 

724; 2lW. E. 393 1187 

EngUshman, The (1877), 3 P. D. 18 ; 47 L. J. Adm. 9 ; 37 L. T. 412. . . . 177 

Ennia's case (1835), Knapp & 0. 435 497 

Enohin v. Wylie (1862), 10 H. of L. Cas. 1 ; 31 L. J. Ch. 402 ; 6 L. T. N. S. 

603 ; 10 W. E. 467 1161 

Enos V. Tuttle (1820), 3 Conn. 250 380 

Ensign t). Webster (1799), 1 Johns. 145 552 

Enticknap v. Eice (1865), 4 S. & T. 136 ; 13 L. T. 211 ; 34 L. J. P. 110.. 978 

Entwistle v. Davis (1867), L. E. 4 Eq. 272 ; 36 L. J. Oh. 826 684 

Entwistle v. Dent (1846), 11 Q. B. 1002 1037 

Enyon, Ee (1873), 42 L. J. P. & M. 62; L. E. 3 P. & D. 92 ; 21 W. E. 

856 695 

Eriskine v. Murray (1728), 2 Ld. Raym. 1542 5 

Ernest v. NiohoUs (1857), 6 H. of L. Cas. 401 642 

Erskine v. Adeane (1873), 42 L. J. Ch. 395 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 919 774 

Erwin V. Saunders (1823), 1 Cowen, 249 757 

Eschemann, In re, (1893) 9 Times L. E. 426 179 

Escott V. Mastin (1842), 4 Moo. P. C. 130 1019 

Espey v. Lake (1852), 10 Hare, 260 ; 16 Jur. 1107 ; 22 L. J. Ch. 336 137 

Essex, Countess of, case (1613), 2 How. St. Tr. 802 359 

Essex Witches (1645), 4 How. St. Tr. 817 557 

Easton, Ld., v. Ld. Hy. Seymour (1802), cited 2 Curt. 339 702 

Evans v. Angell (1858), 26 Beav. 202 804 

Evans ». Beattie (1803), 5 Esp. 26 608 

Evans v. DaUow (1862), 31 L. J. P. 128 706, 707 

Erans V. Davies (1836), 2 H. & W. 15 ; 3 N. & P. 404 ; 4 A. & E. 840 . . 717 

Evans v. Evans and Eobinson (1858), 27 L. J. P. 57 1119 

Evans v. Eryer (1839), 10 A. & E. 615 ; 2 P. & D. 501 187, 190 

Evans v. Getting (1834), 6 C. & P. 586 1179 

Evans v. Hoare, (1892) 1 Q. B. 593 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 470 ; 66 L. T. 345 ; 

40 W. E. 442 ; 56 J. P. 664 674 

Evans V. Morgan (1832), 2 C. & J. 453 295, 373 

Evans 1). Niohol (1841), 3 M. & Gr. 614; 4 Scott, N. E. 43 ; 5 Jur. 

1110 646 

Evans «!. Phillips (1763), 2 Selw. N. P. 1072 987 

Evans J). PowiB(1847), 1 Ex. 601; 11 Jur. 1043 192 

Evans V. Eees (1839), 2 P. & D. 627 ; 10 A. & E. 161 ..396, 404, 405, 406, 432, 

811, 1109, 1161, 1207 

Evans f. Roberts (1826), 8 D. &E. 611 ; 6 B. & C. 832 685, 686 

Evans i>. Eoe (1872), L. E. 7 C. P. 138 ; 26 L. T. 70 753 

Evans «>. Simon (1853), 9 Ex. 282; 2 C. L. E. 416; 23 L. J. Ex. 16 711 

Evans v. Sweet (1824), Ey. & M. 83 ; 1 C. & P. 277 311, 312 

Evans t). Taylor (1838), 7 A. & E. 617; 3 N. & P. 174 395, 404, 1038, 1040 

Evans V. Watson (1846), 3 C. B. 327 ; 4 D. & L. 193 ; 15 L. J. C. P. 256 ; 

10 Jur. 818 396, 818 

Evans V. Williamson (1881), 60 L. J. Ch. 197; 17 Ch. D. 696; 43 L. T. 

719 ; 29 W. E. 230 146 

Evelyn v. Haynes (1782), cited Outram v. Morewood, 3 East, 365 ; 7 E. E,. 

473 1 120 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Ixxvii 

PAGE 

Everard v. Poppleton (1843), 6 Q. B. 181 ; Dav. & M. 322 ; 13 L. J. Q. B. 1 ; 

7 Jut. 991 733, 734 

Everett v. Everett (1877), 7 Ch. D. 428 ; 47 L. J. Oh. 367 ; 30 L T. 913 ; 

25 W. R. 765 808 

Everett v. Lowdham (1831), 5 C. & P. 91 918 

Everett v. Robertson (1859), 28 L. J. Q. B. 23; 1 E. & E. 16 ; 4 Jur. 

N. S. 1083 710 

Everett v. Touells (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 349 1 139 

Everingham v. Roundell (1838), 2 M. & Rob. 138 ; 2 Lewin, C. C. 157. .357, 358 

Ewart «i. Jones (1845), 14 M. & W. 774 ; 2 Dowl. & L. 252 872 

Ewart V. Williams (1855), 3 Drew. 21 ; 7 De G. M. & G. 68 462 

Ewer V. Ambrose (1825), 4 B. & C. 24 ; 6 Dowl. & R. 127 956, 1013 

Ewing V. Osbaldiston (1834), 6 Sim. 608 970 

Exall V. Partridge (undated), cited 1 Starkle, 284 319 

Exeter, May. of, v. Warren (1844), 5 Q. B. 801 ; D. & M. 524 ; 8 Jar. 

441 123, 440, 442, 443 

Eynon, Inre (1873), 42L.J. P. &M:.52; L. R. 3P & D. 92; 21 W. R. 866. 695 

Eyre, Re (1895), 72 L. T. 588 ; 43 W. R. 638 Add. [679] 

Eyre t). Smith (1877), 2 C. P. D. 435 ; 37 L. T. 417 ; 25 W. R. 871 1132 

F., falsely called D., v. D. (1865), 4 S. & T. 86 ; 34 L. J. P. & M. 66 ; 11 

Jur. N. S. 307 ; 12 L. T. 84 ; 13 W. R. 546 167 

Fabrigas v. Mostyn (1776), 20 How. St. Tr. 122 ; 2 W. Bl. 929 500 

Faoey v. Hurdom (1824), 3 B. & 0. 213 37 

Fairlie v. Christie (1817), 7 Taun. 416 ; Holt, 331 ; 1 Moore, C. P. 114 . . 1193 

Fairlle v. Denton (1828), 3 C. &. P. 103 525 

Fairlie v. Hastings (1804), 10 Ves. 123 388, 389 

Fairman v. Oakford (1860), 5 H. & N. 635 ; 29 L. J. Ex. 459 153 

Fairtitle». Gilbert (1787), 2 T. R. 169 ; 1 R. R. 455 91 

Faith V. M'Intyre a835), 7 C. & P. 44 271, 274 

Falconer v. Hanson (1808), 1 Camp. 171 ; 10 R. R. 663 328, 485 

Fallon V. Robins (1865), 16 Ir. Ch. R. 422 749 

Falmouth, B. of, v. Moss (1822), 11 Price, 455 695 

Fahnouth, E- of, ». Roberts (1842), 9 M. & W. 469; 11 L. J. Ex. 180 ; 

1 Dowl. N. S. 633 328, 1192, 1197, 1214, 1216 

Falmouth, E. of, ». Thomas (1832), 1 C. & M. 89 ; 2 L. J. Ex. 57 ; 3 Tyr. 26 687 

Fanny CarviU, The {see The Magnet). 

Fanshawe v. Lond. and Prov. Dairy Co. {see Timson v. Wilson). 

Farina ». Home (1846), 16M. & W. 119; 16 L. J. Ex. 73 691 

Farquhar v. Southey (1826), 1 M. & M. 14 1196, 1 201 

Farquharson v. Seton (1828), 5 Russ. 45 1123 

Farquharson Tweedale, In re (1875), 44 L. J. P. & M. 35 ; L. R. 3 P. & D. 

204 ; 31 L. T. 799 142, 702 

Farrah v. Keat (1838), 6 Dowl. 470 833 

Farrar v. Beswiok (1836), 1 M. & Rob. 627 160 

Farrar v. Hutchinson (1839), 9 A. & E. 641 ; 1 P. & D. 437 ; 2 W. VV. & 

H. 106 487, 552. 744 

Farrar v. Staokpole (1829), 6 Greenl. 154 786 

Farrer v. St. Catherine's CoUege (1873), L. R. 16 Eq. 21 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 

809 ; 28 L. T. 800 ; 21 W. R. 643 797, 799 

Farringdou v. Clerk (1782), 3 Doug. 124 ; 2 Chitty, 429 545 

Farrington v. Donohoe (1866), Ir. R. 1 C. L. 675 ; 14 W. R. 922 682 

Farrow v. Mayes (1862), 18 Q. B. 516 ; 17 Jur. 132 736 

Farrow V. Wilson (1869), 38 L. J. C. P. S26 ; L. R. 4 C. P. 744 ; 18 

W.R. 43 780 

Farwell v. Hilliard (1825), 3 New Hamp. R. 318 1116 

Faaset v. Brown (1861), Peake, R. 23 134 

Fanlder v. Silk (1811), 3 Camp. 126 ; 13 R. R. 771 1102 

Faulds V. Jackson (1845), 6 Notes of Cas. (Eco. & Mar.), Supp. i 694, 696 

Faulkner v. Brine (185S), 1 F. & P. 254 939 

Faussett v. Faussett (1849), 7 Notes of Cas. (Eoc. & Mar.), 93 389, 503 



Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



Ixxviii TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOB 

raviell V. East. Count. Ey. Co. (1848), 2 Ex. 344 ; 6 Dowl. & L. 54 ; 17 

L. J. Ex. 223, 297 543 

Pawoettj;. Cash (1834), 5 B. & Ad. 904; 3 N. & M. 177 36, 153 

Fawoett V. Jones (1810), 3 Phillim. 476 140 

Pawcus, In the goods of (1884), 9 P. D. 241 ; 54 L. J. P. 47 ; 33 W. R. 323 ; 

48 J. P. 743 1031 

Faircus e. Sarefield (1856), 25 L. J. Q. B. 249 ; 6 E. & B. 192 ; 2 Jul. 

N. S. 665 771 

Pawkea «>. Lamb (1862), 31 L. J. Q. B. 98 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 385 756,782 

Fazakerley v. Wiltshire (1720), '1 Str. 1720 17 

Fearn v. Lewis (1830), 6 Bing. 349 ; 1 M. & P 1 712 

Fearnside v. Flint (1882), 22 Ch. D. 579 ; 52 L. J. Ch. 479 ; 48 L. T. 154 ; 

31 W. R. 318 721 

Feaubert v. Turst (1702), Pree. Ch. 207 938 

Fellowes v. Clay (1842), 4 Q. B. 313 ; 3 G. & D. 407 ; 12 L. J. Q. B. 202. . To 

Fellowes v. AViiUamaon (1829), M. & M. 306 378 

Feltham's Trusts, Re (1855), 1 K. & J. 528 798 

Fennv. Griffith (1830), 6 Bing. 633; 4 M. & P. 299 285 

FenneU v. Tait (1834), 1 C. M. & R. 584 ; 5 Tyr. 218 837 

Fanner «. Lond. & S. E. Ry. Co. (1872), 41 L. J. Q. B. 313 ; L. R. 7 

Q. B. 767 ; 26 L. T. 971 ; 20 W. R. 830 1186 

Fenton v. Emblers (1762), 3 Burr. 1278 ; 1 W. Bl. 363 682 

Fenwiok, Re (1867), L. R. 1 P. & D. 319 ; 36 L. J. P. 54 ; 16 L. T. 124 .. 704 

Fenwick v. BeU (1844), 1 C. & K. 312 934, 936 

Fenwiok v. Laycook (1841), 2 Q. B. 108 ; 1 G. & D. 532 ; 6 Jur. 341 ; 11 

L. J. Q. B. 146 550 

Fenwiok v. Reed (1816), 1 Meriv. 114 .-. 600 

Fenwiok v. Thornton (1827), M. & M. 51 495 

Ferguson j>. Mahon (1839),11 A.&E.179; 3P.&r).143..8, 1142, 1147, 1148, 1154 

Fernandey v. Glynn (1807), 1 Camp. 426 1200 

Fernandez, Ex parte (1861), 10 C.B.N. S. 3; SOL. J. C. P. 321 920,962, 

964 
Femley ». "Worthington (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 491 ; 1 Scott, N. R. 432 ; 

4 Jur. 918 304, 1101 

Ferrand v. Milligan (1845), 7 Q. B. 730 ; 15 L. J. Q. B. 103 ; 10 J-ur. 6 . . 1231 

Ferrer v. Oven (1827), 7 B. & C. 427 ; 1 M. & R. 222 1038 

Ferrers v. Arden (1599), 6 Co. Rep. 7 ; Cro. Eliz. 668 1110 

Ferrers, Ld., v. Shirley (1730), Fitz-G. 195 ; Bull. N". P. 236 1221 

Ferris t>. Goodbum( 1858), 27 L.J. Ch. 574: 6 W. R. 485 753,807 

Fesenmayer v. Adcock (1847), 16 M. & W. 449 117 

Feversham, Ld., v. Emerson (1866), 11 Ex. 385 ; 24 L. J. Ex. 264 ; 26 L. 

T. (0. S.) 28 ; 3 C. L. R. 1379 89 

Few V. Guppy (1830), 10 Beav. 281, n. (i) ; 13 Beav. 467 597 

Ffinch V. Combe, (1894) 6 R. 546; (1894) P. 191; 63 L. J. P. 113; 70 

L. T. 160; 42 W. R. 377 142,708 

Fiddey, Re, Jones v. Frost (1872), L. R. 7 Ch. 773 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 47 ; 27 

L. T. 465 ; 20 W. R. 1025 93 

Field V. Flemming (1836), 7 0. & P. 619; 6 Dowl. 460 ; 1 M. & H. 21 ; 

1 Jur. 24 474 

Field V. Gt. North. Ry. Co. (1878), 3 Ex. D. 261 ; 47 L. J. Q. B. 662 ; 39 

L. T. 80; 26W. R. 817 42 

Field V. Hemming [see Field v. Flemming). 

Field V. Holland (1810), 6 Cranoh, 8, 24 495 

Fields. Lelean (1861), 30 L. J. Ex. 170; 6 H. & N. 627; 7 Jur. N. S. 

918 ; 4 L T. 121 ; 9 W. R. 387 766, 769 

Fields. Woods (1837), 7 A. &E. 114; 2 N. & P. 117 225, 646 

Figgo. Wedderbume (1842), 6 Jur. 218 419 

Filipowski v. Merryweather (1860), 2 F. & P. 285 162 

Filmerf. Gott (1774), 4 Brown, P. C. 230 746, 748 

Financial Ins. Co., Re (1867), 36 L. J. Ch. 687 846 

Finch V. Finch (1752), 2 Ves. sen. 493 960 

Finch V. Finch (1867), 36 L. J. P. & M. 78 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 371 ; 16 L. T. 

268 ; 16 W. R. 797 143, 307 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OP CASES CITED. Ixxix 

FAoa 

Finoh V. Finch (1882), 23 Ch. D. 267 ; 48 L. T. 129 ; 31 W. E. 526 631 

Finlay v. Bristol & Ex. Ey. Co. (1852), 7 Ex. 409 ; 7 Eallw. Gas. 449 ; 21 

L. J. Ex. 117 6»3 

Finlay «>. Einlay (1862), 31 L. J. P. & M. 149 62 

Finn's case (1827), 5 Eand. 701 328 

Finnerty v. Tipper (1809), 2 Camp. 72 245, 246 

Finney v. Finney (1868), L. E. 1 P. & D. 483 ; 37 L. J. P. & M. 43 ; 18 

L. T. 489 1106 

Finney v. Grioe (1878), 10 Ch. D. 13 ; 48 L. J. Ch. 247 ; 27 W. E. 147 . . 146 

Firkin v. Edwards (1840), 9 C. & P. 478 314 

Firth, Ex parte, Ee Cowburn (188j), 19 Oh. D. 419 ; 61 L. J. Oh. 473 ; 45 

L. T. 120 ; 30 W. E. 529 , 136 

Firth, In re, Ex parte Sohofield (1877), 12 Ch. D. 337; 48 L. J. Bank. 

122 ; 40 L. T. 823 ; 27 W. E. 925 966 

Fischer v. Popham (1875), L. E. 3 P. & D. 246 ; 44 L. J. P. 47 ; 33 L. T. 

231 ; 23 W. E. 683 697 

Fischers. Szataray (1858), 27 L. J. Q. B. 239; E. B. & E. 321 ; 4 Jur. 

N. S. 632 347 

Fish, Ee, Ingham v. Eayner, (1894) 7 E. 434 ; (189i) 2 Ch. 83 ; 63 L. J. 

Ch. 437 ; 70 L. T. 826 ; 24 W. E. 520 793 

Fisher v. Clement (1830), 10 B. & C. 475 82 

Fishery. Dudding (1841), 9 Dowl. 872; SM. &Gr. 238; 3 Soott, N. E.516.. 1031 

Fisher ». Heming (1809), cited 1 Ph. Evid. 170 600 

Fisher v. Joyce (1839), cited 9 C. & P. 338 259 

Fisher v. Keane (1880), 11 Oh. D. 353 ; 49 L. J. Oh. 11 ; 41 L. T. 335 .. 1147 

Fisher v. latohingmau (1742), Willes, 367 1031 

Fisher ». Lane (1771), 2 "W. Bl. 834; 3 Wils. 297 1033, 1034 

Fisher v. Magnay (1843), 5 M. & Gr. 787 ; 1 D. & L. 40 ; 6 Soott, N. E. 

588 ; 12 L. J. C. P. 276 543 

Fisher v. Ogle (1808), 1 Camp. 419 1149 

Fisher v. Owen (1878), 8 Oh. D. 645 ; 47 L. J. Oh. 681 ; 38 L. T. 677 ; 26 

W. E. 681 961, 964 

Fisher v. Eonalds (1852), 12 0. B. 762 ; 22 L. J. C. P. 62 ; 17 Jur. 393 ; 

20 L. T. O. S. 100 ; 1 W. E. 54 964,970 

Fisher v. Samuda (1808), 1 Camp. 193 357 

Fisher v. Thames June. Ey. Co. (1837), 5 Dowl. 773 227, 367 

Fishmongers' Co. v. Dimsdale (1852), 6 C. B. 898 ; 12 0. B. 557 ; 22 L. J. 

C. P. 44 ; 16 Jur. 799 1213 

Fishmongers' Co. v. Eohertson (1845), 5 M. & Gr. 194 ; 12 L. J. 0. P. 

185; 6 Scott, N. E. 56 97, 531, 552 

Fishmongers' Co. v. Eohertson (1845), 1 0. B. 67 1213 

Fitch V. Jones (1855), 5 E. & B. 238 ; 24 L. J. Q. B. 293 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 

854 261, 262 

Fitch V. SmaUhrook (1661), T. Baym. 32 1031 

Pitz V. Eabbits (1837), 2 M. & Eob. 60 306 

Fitzgerald «. Dressier (1859), 29 L. J. 0. P. 113; 7 C. B. N. S. 374; 6 

Jur. N. S. 598 676 

Fitzgerald v. Elsee (1811), 2 Camp. 635 1209 

Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald (1849), 8 Com. B. 492 1069 

Fitzgeraldw.Fitzgerald(1863), 3S.,&T. 397; 33L. J.P.&M. 39; 11W.E.85 325 

Fitzgerald v. O'Flaherty (1827), 2 Moll. 394, n 487 

Fitz-James v. Moya (1663), 1 Sid. 133 ; Andr. 321 899 

Fitzmaurice, Ee (1864), 15 Ir. Eq. E. 445 720 

Fitzmauiioe v. Bayley (1857), 8 E. & B. 664 ; 9 H. L. Cas. 78 673, 729 

Fitzpatriok v. Dunphy (1851), 1 Ir. C. L. E. 366 117 

Fitzroy, Sir C.,Ee (1858), 1 S. & T. 133 702 

Fitzwalter Peer. (1842), Pari. Min. 34, 91 425, 426, 1226, 1227, 1228 

Fladoyen, The (1799), 8 T. E. 270, n 1143 

Flagg V. Mann (1837), 2 Sumn. 487 '. . . . 909 

Flannery's case (1832), 1 Lew. CO. 133 824 

Flannery v. "Waterford & 0. Ey. Co. (1877), I. E. 11 0. L. 30 163 

Fleet V. Murton (1871), 41 L. J. Q. B. 49 ; L. E. 7 Q. B. 126 ; 26 L. T. 181 ; 

20 W. E. 97 232, 764, 769 



Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



IXXX TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAOE 

Fleet V. Perrins (1868), 37 L. J. Q. B. 233 ; L. E. 3 Q. B. 636 ; 9 B. & S. 

675; 191.. T. 147 1036, 1037 

Fleming v. Fleming (1862), 31 L. J. Ex. 419 ; 1 H. & C. 242 793 

Fleming v. Newton (1848), 1 H. of L. Gas. 363 1005 

Fletcher v. Braddyll (1821), 3 Stark. R. 64 164, 932 

Fletcher ». Calthrop (1845), 6 Q. B. 880, 891 ; I New Sess. Cas. 629 ; 14 

L. J. Q. B. 49 ; 9 Jut. 205 131 

Fletcher v. Froggatt (1827), 2 C. & P. 569 479 

Fletcher v. aillespie (1826), 3 Bing. 636 ; 11 Moore, C. P 547 764 

Fletcher v. Gt. West. Ry. Co. (1869), 4 H. & N. 242 ; 29 L, J. Ex. 263 ; 

6 Jur. N. S. 961 ; 8 W. R. 601 114 

Fletcher v. L. & N. W. R. Co. (1892), 1 Q. B. 122 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 324 ; 

65 L. T. 605 ; 40 W. R. 182 1138 

Flinn V. Calow (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 689 768 

Flitters v. Allfrey (1874), 44 L. J. C. P. 73 ; L. R. 10 C. P. 29 ; 31 L. T. 

881 1117, 1119 

Flood V. Russell, (1892) 29 L. R. Ir. 91 436 

Fioijv. Denny (1852), 7 Ex. 581 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 223 639 

Flower v. Herbert (1851), 2 Ves. sen. 326 542 

Floyd V. Barker (1607), 12 Co. Rep. 25 1099 

Flureau v. Thomhill (1775-6), 2 W. Bl. 1078 773 

Fogarty v. Smith (1836), 4 Dowl. 558, n 16 

Foggassa's case (1349), T. B. 24 Edw. 3, 23, cited in Olive v. Guin, 2 Sid. 146 8 

Foley V. Tabor (1861), 2 F. & F. 663 270 

Folkes V. Chadd (1782), 3 Doug. 157 240, 930, 932 

FoUett V. Jefferyes (1850), 1 Sim. N. S. 17; 20 L. J. Ch. 65; 16 Jur. 118. .692,606 

Fonsiok v. Agar (1807), 6 Esp. 92 328 

Foot V. Clarke (1826), 1 Russ. 604 423 

Foot V. Stanton (1856), Deane, Eco. R. 19 697 

Foot V. Tracy (1806), 1 Johns. 46 265 

Foote V. Hayne (1824), 1 C. & P. 545 ; Ry. & M. 165 699 

Foquet v. Moor (1852), 7 Ex. 870 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 35 657 

Forbes' case (1872), 41 L. J. Ch. 467 ; 20 W. R. 586 ; 26 L. T. 680 845 

Forbest).Forbes(1854),Kay,364; 2Eq. R. 178; 23L. J.Ch.724; 18Jur.642. 179 
Ford V. Agar (1863), 2 H. & C. 279 ; 32 L. J. Ex. 138 ; 7 L. T. 795 ; 11 

W. R. 429 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 416 75 

Ford V. Batley (1854), 23 L. J. Ch. 225 ; 17 Beav. 303 800 

Ford V. Cotesworth (1870), 9 B. & S. 659 ; 10 B. & S. 991 ; L. R. 5 Q. B. 

544; 39L. J. Q. B. 188; 23L. T. 165; 18^. R. 1169 154 

Ford V. Elliott (1849), 4 Ex. 78 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 447 382 

Ford V. Ford (1848), 6 Hare, 490 741 

Ford V. Tennant (1863), 32 L.' J. Ch. 465 ; 32 Beav. 162 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 292 ; 

7L. T. 732; 11 W. R. 324 608 

Ford V. Yates (1841), 2 M. & Gr. 549 ; 2 Scott, N. R. 645 757 

Fordham v. "Wallis (1852-3), 10 Hare, 217 ; 17 Jur. 228 ; 22 L. J. Ch. 648 493 

Forman v. Free Fishers of Whitstable (1869), L. R. 4 H. L. 266 ; 21 L. T. 804 123 

Forman». Wright (1851), 11 C. B. 481 ; 20 L.J. C. P. 145; 15 Jur. 706.. 201 

Forrest v. Forrest (1865), 34 L. J. Ch. 428 666 

Forshaw v. Chabert (1821), 3 B. & B. 158 ; 6 Moore (C. P.), 369 1193 

Forshaw v. Lewis (1855), 10 Ex. 716 ; 1 Jar. N. S. 263 1184 

Forster v. Clements (1809), 2 Camp. 17 ; 11 R. R. 650 647 

Forster v. Farquhar, (1893) 1 Q. B. 564 ; 62 L. J. Q. B. 296 ; 68 L. T. 

308 ; 41 W. R. 425 42 

Forster v. Forster (1864), 33 L. J. P. & M. 113 1216 

Forster v. Hale (1798), 3 Ves. 696 ; 6 Ves. 308 ; 4 R. R. 128 665 

Forster v. Maokreth (1867), 22 L. J. Ch. 926 160 

Forster v. Rowland (1861), 30 L. J. Ex. 396 ; 7 H. & N. 103 676 

Forsyth v. Bristowe (1853), 8 Ex. 716 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 265 ; 17 Jur. 675 . . 722 

Forsythe v. Norcross (1836), 6 Watts, 432 458 

Forth!). Stanton (1668), 1 Wms. Saunders, 211a, 21 le 676 

Foster v. AUanson (1788), 2 T. R. 479 764 

Foster v. Bank of England (1846), 8 Q. B. 689 ; 15 L. J. Q. B. 212 ; 10 

Jur. 372 . , 997 

TAe references are to pages, not to paragraph). 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Ixxxi 

FAQB 

Foster v. Blakelook (1826), 5 B. & C. 328 ; 8 D. & R. 48 653 

Foster v. Charles (1830), 6 Bing. 396 ; 7 Bing. 105 ; 4 M. & P. 61, 741 . . 82 

Foster v. Compton (1818), 2 Stark. 364 1032 

Foster v. Hall (1831), 12 Pick. 89 599, 600 

Foster v. Jolly (1836), 1 C. M. & R. 707 ; 5 Tyr. 239 ; 4 L. J. Ex. 66. .748, 757 
Foster v. Mentor Life Ass. Co. (1854), 3 E. & B. 48 ; 2 C. L. B. 1404 ; 23 

L. J. Q. B. 145 ; 18 Jur. 828 44, 538, 648, 769 

Foster ». M'Mahon (1847), 11 Ir. Eq. R. 287 437, 613 

Foster v. Pointer (1840), 9 C. & P. 718 189, 315, 319 

Foster v. Shaw (1821), 7 Serg. & R. 163 353, 364, 1097 

Foster v. Steele (1837), 3 Bing. N. C. 892 ; 6 Soott, 26 ; 3 Hodges, 231 . . 176 

Foulkes V. SeUway (1800), 3 Esp. 236 255, 373 

Fountain v. Boodle (1842), 3 Q. B. 6 : 2 a. & D. 455 Ill, 263 

Fountain v. Young (1807), 6 Esp. 113 600 

Fowell V. Forrest (l669-70), 2 Wms. Saund. 47 ff, 47 gg 760 

Fowkes V. Pascoe (1876), 44 L. J. Ch. 367 ; L. R. 10 Ch. 343 ; 32 L. T. 

545 ; 23 W. R.-638 667, 806 

Fowler v. Coster (1828), M. & M. 241 ; 3 C. & P. 463 270 

Fowler v. Fowler (1735), 3 P. Wms. 353 806 

Fowler ». Fowler (1859), 4 De G. & .J. 2.'i0 749 

Fowler v. Fowler (1881), 60 L. J. Ch. 686 ; 44 L. T. 799 ; 29 W. R. 800. . , 321 

Fowler t>. Savage (1819), 3 Conn. 90 1098 

Fowlis V. Davidson (1848), 6 Notes of Cas. (Eco. & Mar.) 473 263 

Fox V. Clifton (1830), 6 Bing. 792 386, 540 

Fox V. Fox (1863), 15 Ir. Eq. N. S. 89 666 

Fox V. Jones (1828), 7 B. & C. 732 ; 1 M. & R. 570 998 

Foxt). Waters (1840), 12 A. & E. 43 291, 492 

Fox's case (1863), 3 De G. J. & S. 46-') 1176 

Foxoroft V. Nevens (1826), 4 Greenl. 72 508 

France v. Lucy (1825), Ry. & M. 341 313 

Franohot v. Leach (1826), 5 Cowen, 508 746 

Francis v. Cockrell (1870), L. R. 5 Q. B. 184 ; 39 L. J. Q. B. 113 ; L. R. 

6 Q. B. 501 ; 39 L. J. Q. B. 291 ; 10 B. & S. 950 772 

Francis v. Dichfield (1742), 2 Ccop. 531 760, 805 

Francis v. Hawkesley (1859), 28 L. J. Q. B. 370 ; 1 E. & E. 1052 ; 6 Jur. 

N. S. 1391 710 

Francisco v. Gilmore (1797). 1 Bos. & P. 177 341 

Franoklin's case (1731), 17 How. St. Tr. 626 25 

Frank v. Frank (1840), 2 M. & Rob. 315 1102 

Franklin u. Baker (1893, should be " 1891 "), 29 Am. St. Rep. 547; 48 

Ohio, 296 1192 

Frankum v. Ld. Falmouth (1835), 6 C. & P. 529 ; 2 A. & E. 462 192 

Eraser, Re (1869), 39 L. J. P. & M. 20 ; L. R. 2 P. & D. 40 703 

Eraser t>. Burrows (1877), 46 L. J. Ex 501 ; 2 Q. B. D. 624 1186 

Fraser v. Hill (1863), 1 Macq. 398 ; 1 Paterson, 232 30 

Praser v. Pendlebury (1862), 31 L. J. C. P. 1 ; 10 W. R. 104 94 

Fray v. Blackburn (1863), 3 B. & S. 576 1099 

Frayes v. Worms (1861), 10 C. B. N. S. 149 1152 

Frederick v. Att.-Gen. (1874), 44 L. J. P. & M. 11 ; L. R. 3 P. & D. 270 ; 

32 L T 39 409 

Free ti.Hawkirls (i8i7)VHolt,' N.' P.' R.",5,5o'.'.' .'.'.'.'.'.".'.'.'.'.'.".'.'.'.".'.'.'.'.' .548, 757 
Free Fishers of "WhitBtable v. Foreman (1869), L. R. 2 C. P. 688 ; 37 L. J. 

C. P. 305 ; 38 L. J. C. P. 345 ; L. K. 4 H. 266 ; 21 L. T. 804 123 

Free Fishers of Whitstable v. Gann (1863), 11 C. B. N. S. 387 ; 13 C. B. 

N. S. 869 123 

Freeman v. Arkell (182i), 2 B. & C. 494 ; 3 D. & R. 669; 1 C. & P. 135, 

326 303, 616 

Freeman v. Baker (1833), 6 0. & P. 482 ; 5 B. & Ad. 797 ; 2 N. & M. 446 1047 
Freeman v. Cooke (1848), 2 Ex. 662 ; 6 Dowl. & L. 189 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 114. .89, 

90, 538, 543, 560 
Freeman v. Cox (1878), 8 Ch. D. 148 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 560 ; 26 W. R. 689 . . 524 
Freeman ». Freeman (1854), 23 L. J. Ch. 838 ; 5 De G. M. & G. 704 ; 
Kay, 479 704 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



Ixxxii TABLE OF CASES CITED, 

PAOE 

Freeman ». aainsford (1865), 34 L. J. C. P. 95 ; 18 C. B. N. S. 185 ; 1 

H. &P. 255; 11 Jur. N. S. 116; 11 L. T. 675; 13 "W. R. 343 684 

Freeman v. Phillipps (1816), 4 M. & Sel. 486 ; 16 R. E. 524. .395, 404, 410, 411 
Freeman v. Pope (1870), L. R. 9 Eq. 206 ; L. R. 5 Ch. 538 ; 39 L. J. Oh. 

148, 689; 21 L. T. 816; 18 W. R. 906 135 

Freeman t;. Read (1863), 32 L. J. M. 0. 226; 4B. &S. 174; 10 Jur. N. S. 

149; 8L. T. 458; 11 W. R. 802 S95, 396, 1040 

Freeman ». Steggal (1849), 14 Q. B. 202; 19L.J. Q. B. 18; 13 Jur. Iu30.. 474, 

1192, 1212 
Freeman v. Tatham (1846), 5 Hare, 329 ; 15 L. J. Ch. 323 ; 10 Jur. 685. . 482 

Freeman v. Walker (1829), 6 Greenl. 68 651 

Freemoult v. Dedire (1718), 1 P. Wms. 431 936 

Freestone v. Butnher (1840), 9 C. & P. 647 166 

French v. French (1 755), 1 Dick. 268 1104 

Freston, Inre (1883),52L. J. Q.B. 545; llQ. B.D. 545; 31W. R. 804.. 868 
Fricker's case, Re Bank of Hindustan (1871), Ij. R. 13 Eq. 178 ; 41 L. J. 

Ch. 278 , 846 

Friendv.Lond. Chat. &D.Ry. (1877), L.R.2Ex. 437; 46L.J.Ex. 696. .697,1186 
Frinsep (should be Prinsep) and E. Indiai Co. v. Dyce Somhre (1832 should 

be 1856), 10 Moo. P. C. C. 285 140 

Frith, Re (1858), 27 L. J. P. & M. 6 ; 1 S. & T. 8 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 288 .... 700 

Frith V. Barker (1807), 2 Johns. 335, 765 

Frost V. HoUoway (1818), cited 1 Stark. Evid. 212 ; 2 Ph. Evid. 500 .... 967 
Frost V. OUver (1853), 2 E. & B. 301 ; 1 C. L. R. 1003 ; 22 L. J. Q. B. 

353 ; 18 Jur. 166 17S 

Froude v. Hobbs (1859), 1 Fost. & Fin. 612 26 

Fry V. Chapman (1836), 5 Dowl. P. C. 265 287 

Fry 1!. Hin (1817), 7 Taun. 397 ; 18 R. R. 512 37 

Fry V. Wood (1731), 1 Atk. 445 328, 329 

Fryer v. Wiaeman (1876), 45 L. J. Ch. 199 ; 24 W. R. 206 ; 33 L. T. 779. . 910 
Puentes v. Montis (1868), L. R. i C. P. 93 ; 38 L. J. C. P. 95 ; 19 L. T. 

364 ; 17 W. R. 208 116 

Fuller V. Crittenden (1832), 9 Conn. 401 552, 744 

Fuller V. Fenwick (1846), 3 C. B. 705 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 79 ; 10 Jur. 1057 . . 1160 

Fuller V. Fotoh (1695), Carth. 346 1050, 1064, 1059, 1103 

Fuller V. Hampton (1824), 5 Conn. 416 515 

Fuller V. Pattrick (1849), 18 L. J. Q. B. 236 1211 

FuUer v. Prentice (1788), 1 H. Bl. 49 ; 2 R. R. 715 819 

Fuller V. Redman (1859), 26 Beav. 614 ; 29 L. J. Ch. 324; 5 Jur. N. S. 

1045 713 

Fulmerston v. Steward (1554), Plowden, 107a 658 

Fulton V. Andrew (1875), L. R. 7 H. L. 461 ; 44 L. J. P. & M. 23 ; 32 

L. T. 209; 23 W. R. 566 140 

Fulwood's, Lady, case (1637), Cro. Car. 483 ; 1 Chit. Cr. L. 404 986 

Purley v. Wood (1794), 1 Bsp. 198 766 

Furlong v. Howard (1804), 2 Soh. & Lef. 116 321 

Furly V. Newnham (1780), 2 Doug. 419 837 

Furneanx v. Hutchius (1778), 2 Cowp. 807 231 

Fumell V. Staokpoole (1829), Millward, 485 9, 1024 

Furness)). Meek (1857), 27 L. J. Ex. 34 44, 47, 1204 

Fursdou V. Clogg (1842), 10 M. & W. 672 437 

Futcher v. Patcher (1881), 50 L. J. Ch. 735; 45 L. T. 306; 29 W. R. 

884 224 

Fyler v. Givens (1835), Riley, L. Cas. 56 669 

Fysons). Chambers (1842), 9M. & W. 460; 11 L. J. Ex. 190 117 

Fyson v. Kemp (1833), 6 C. & P. 71 1018 



Gaeat v. Lloyd (1825), 3 B. & C. 793 158 

Gabbett v. Clancy (1844-5), 8 Ir. L. R. 299 1040 

Gadd V. Houghton (1877), 46 L. J. Ex. 71 ; 1 Ex. D. 357 758 

Gainsford v. Grammar (1809), 2 Camp. 9 ; 11 R. R. 648 506, 607 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Ixxxiii 

PAGE 

G-albratth v. Neville (1776-6), 1 Doug. 6, n 1154, 1155 

Gale «. Lindo (1887, should be 1687), 1 Vera. 475 639 

Gale)). "Wmiamson (1841), 8M. & W. 408; 10 L. J. Ex. 446 748,764 

Galsworthy ». Norman (1861), 21 L. J. Q. B. 70 1185 

Gananoque, The (1862), Lush. 448 168 

Ganer v. Lanesborough (1790), 1 Peake, 18 ; 3 R. R. 647 938 

Gann i>. Free Fishers of Whitstable (1862), 20 C. B. N. S. 1 ; 36 L. J. C. 

P. 29 ; 12 L. T. 150 ; 13 W. R. 589 ; 11 H. L. Cas. 192 123 

Gann v. Gregory (1853), 22 L. J. Ch. 1059 ; 3 D. M. & G. 777 ; 18 Jur. 

1063 ; 2 Eq. B. 484 ; 2 "W. E,. 484 142 

Gann v. Johnson (1863), 11 C. B. N. S. 387 ; 13 C. B. N. S. 859 123 

Garbutt v. Simpson (1863), 32 L. J. M. C. 186 ; 2 New R. 276 ; 8 L. T. 

423 ; 11 "W. R. 751 951 

Garcias v. Ricardo (1844), 14 Sim. 265 ; 12 CI. & Fin. 368 1142 

Garden v. Cresswell (1837), 2 M. & W. 319 ; 6 Dowl. 461 ; M. & H. 44. .816, 832 

Gardener v. Ennor (1866), 35 Beav. 549 136 

Gardner, Ee (1858), 27 L. J. P. & M. 56 ; 1 S. & T. 109 356 

Gardner Peer. (1727), Le Marchant's Rep. 389, 432 ; Selw. N. P. 672— 674. . 101 

Gardner v. Croasdale (1760), 2 Burr. 904 207 

Gardner v. Grout (1857), 2 C. B. N. S. 340 690 

Gardner v. McMahon (1842), 3 Q. B. 561 ; 2 G. & D. 593 ; 6 Jur. 712 ; 

11 L. J. Q. B. 297 710, 711 

Gardner J!. Moult (1839), 10 A. &E. 464; 2 P. & D. 403 600 

. Gardner v. Walsh (1865), 5 E. & B. 83 ; 24 L. J. Q. B. 285 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 

828 1194 

Gardom, Ex parte (1808), 15 Vea. 286 161 

Garey v. Nicholson (1840), 24 Wend. 350 222, 479 

Garey v. Pyke (1839), 10 A. & E. 612 ; 2 P. & D. 427 222 

Garland, Ke, Garland v. Beverley (1878), 47 L. J. Ch. 711 ; 9 Ch. D. 213 ; 

38 L. T. 9U ; 26 W. R. 718 798 

Garland v. Cope (1848), 11 Ir. L. R. 514 444 

Garland v. Jaoomb (1873), L. R. 8 Ex. 216; 28 L. T. 877 ; 21 W. R. 868 547 

Garland v. Sooones (1 798), 2 Esp. 648 1032 

Garloch v. Geortner (1831), 7 Wend. 198 154 

Gamer v. Gamer (1860), 29 Beav. 116 ; 7 L. T. 182 798 

Garnet v. Ball (1822), 3 Stark. R. 160 499 

Gamett, Inre, Gandy !). Maoaulay (1885), 31 Ch. D. 1 631 

Gamett «;. Ferrand (1827), 6 B. & C. 611 ; 8 D. & R. 657 1099 

Gamett v. Woodcock (1817), 6 M. & S. 44 ; 1 Stark. R. 475 33 

Gamier, Re (1872), L. R. 13 Eq. 532 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 419 ; 20 W. R. 288 . . 1150 

Garnons v. Barnard (179:5), 1 Anstr. 298 ; ? Eagle & Y. 380 401 

Garrard v. Lewis (1882), 10 Q. B. D. 30 ; 47 L. T. 408 1205 

Garrard v. Tuck (1849), 8 C. B. 231 ; 18 L. J. C. P. 338 ; 13 Jur. 871 127 

Garrells v. Alexander (1801), 4 Esp. 37 1220, 1223 

Garrett v. Handley (1825), 4 B. & C. 664 ; 7 D. & R. 144 ; 1 C. & P. 483. 759 
Garth v. Howard (1832), 8 Bing. 461 ; 5 C. & P. 346 ; 1 Moo. & Sc. 628. .388, 

390 

Gartside v. Outram (1866), 26 L. J. Ch. 115 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 39 592 

Gartside v. Silkstone, &c. Co. (1882), 21 Ch. D. 762 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 828 ; 47 

L. T. 76 ; 31 W. R. 36 133 

Garvin v. Carroll (1847), 10 Ir. L. R. 330 957, 1013 

Gas Light and Coke Co. v. Turner (1839-40), 5 Bing. N. C. 666 ; 6 Bing. 

N. C. 324 ; 7 Scott, 779 ; 8 Scott, 609 91 

GaskiU v. Skeeue (1867), 19 L. J. Q. B. 275 ; 14 Q. B. 664 ; 14 Jur. 597 .. 525 

Gass V. Stinson (1837), 2 Sumn. 610 972 

Gathercole v. Miall (1846), 16 M. & W. 319 ; 15 L. J. Ex. 179 ; 10 Jur. 

337 303 

Gatty V. Fry (1877), L. R. 2 Ex. Div. 265 ; 46 L. J. Ex. 605 ; 36 L. T. 

182 ; 25 W. R. 305 646 

Gaunt V. Johnson (1848), 6 Beav. 551 819 

Gaunt!). Wainman (1836), 3 Bing. N. C. 69 ; 3 Scott, 413; 2 Hodges, 

186 95, 1109 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



Ixxxiy TABLE OP CASES CITED. 

Gausden, Re (1862), 2 S. & T. 362 ; 31 L. J. P. 63 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 180 ; 5 

L. T. 767......: 699 

Gay ». Hill (1849), 18 L. J. Q. B. 12 ; 5 Dowl. & L. 422 734 

Gaze !>. Gaze (1843), 3 Curt. 451 696 

Geach v. IngaU (1845), 14 M. & W. 95 ; 15 L. J. Ex. 37 ; 9 Jur. 691 . .258, 259, 

Geary v. Hopkins (1702), 2 Ld. Eaym. 851 997 

Geaves «. Price (1868), 32 L. J. P. & M. 113 : 3 S. & T. 71 704 

Gee«;. Ward (1857), 7 E. & B. 509; 3 Jur. N. S. 692 404, 411 

Geill V. Jeremy (1827), M. & M. 61 32 

Geils V. Geils (1852), 1 Macq. 36, 255 ; 1 Paterson, 1 1144 

General De Caen, The (1855), Swa. 9 178 

Gen Steam Nav. Co. v. Brit, and Col. St. Nav. Co. (1869), L. E. 3 Ex. 330 ; 

L R. 4 Ex. 238 ; 37 L. J. Ex. 194 ; 38 L. J. Ex. 97 ; 20 L. T. 581 ; 17 

W. R. 741 178 

Gen. Steam NaT. Co. ■„. Guillou (1843), 11 M. & W. 877 ; 13 L. J. Ex. 

168 1143, 1146, 1152 

Gen. Steam Nav. Co. v. Hedley (1869), L. R. 3 P. C. 44 ; 39 L. J. Adm. 

20 ; 21 L. T. 686 ; 18 W. R. 264 ; 6 Moore, P. C. C. N. S. 263 6 

Gen. Steam Nav. Co. v. Loud, and Ed. Ship. Co. (1877), 2 Ex. D. 467 ; 47 

L. J. Ex. 77 ; 36 L. T. 743 ; 25 W. R. 694 41 

Gen. Steam Nav. Co. v. Mann (1855), 14 C. B. 127 ; 22 L. T. (O. S.) 223 ; 

2W. R. 154 6 

Gen. Steam Nav. Co. v. Morrison (1856), 13 C. B. 581 ; 22 L. J. C. P. 179. . 6 

Genese, In re, Ex parte Gilbert (1885). 3 Morrell, B. E. 223 964, 966 

Gening V. The State (1822), 1 MoC. 573 267 

George's Estate, Re, King ». George (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 670 ; 36 L. T. 

759 ; 25 W. E. 638 808 

George v. Pritohard (1826), Ry. & M. 417 773 

George v. Surrey (1830), 1 M. & M. 516 1220 

George v. Thompson (1836), 4 Dowl. 656 , 314 

Geralopulo v. Wieler (1851), 10 C. B. 712 ; 20 L. J. C. P. 105 ; 15 Jur. 

N. S. 316 290, 299 

Gerish v. Chartier (1845), 1 C. B 13 ; 14 L. J. C. P. 84 ; 9 Jur. 69 242 

German Mining Co., Re (1853), 22 L. J. Ch. 926 ; 4 De G. M. & G. 19 . . 160 
Germania, The (1868), 37 L. J. Adm. 69 ; 19 L. T. 20 ; 21 L. T. 44 .... 364 

Gervia v. Grand West. Canal Co. (1816), 5 M. & Sel. 76 1165 

Gery v. Redman (1875), L. R. 1 Q. B. D. 161 ; 45 L. J. Q. B. 267 ; 24 

W. R. 270 112, 444 

Geyer v. Aquilar (1798), 7 T. R. 696 ; 4 R. R. 543 1103 

Geyer v. Irwiu (1790), 4 Dall. 107 871 

Gibblehouae v. Strong (1832), 3 Rawle, 437 443, 511 

Gibbons. Budd (186.3), 32 L. J. Ex. 182; 2 H. & C. 92 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 

625 ; 8 L. T. 321 520 

Gibbons. Featherstonhaugh (1816), 1 Stark. R. 225 154 

Gibbon V. Young (1818), 2 Moore (C. P.), 224 763 

Gibbon's case (1734), 17 How. St. Tr. 810 1175 

Gibbons v. Powell (1840), 9 C. & P. 634 314 

Gibbons v. Wilcox (1817), 2 Stark. E. 43 494 

Gibbs V. Cruikshank (1873), L. E. 8 C. P. 451 ; 42 L. J. C. P. 273 ; 28 

L. T. 735 ; 21 W. E. 734 1118 

Gibbs V. Fremont (1853), 9 Ex. 26 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 302 ; 17 Jur. 820 48 

Gibbs V. Guild (1882), 9 Q. B. D. 59 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 313 ; 46 L. T. 248 ; 

30 W. E. 591 71 

Gibbs V. Phillipson (1829), 1 Euss. & My. 19 867 

Gibbs V. Pike (1842), 9 M. & W. 351, 360, 361 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 409 ; 12 

L. J. Ex. 257; C Jur. 465 85, 111, 1231 

Gibbs V. Ealph (1845), 14 M. & W. 804 ; 1ft L. J. Ex. 7 1139 

Gibson v. Doeg (otherwise Doey) (1858), 27 L. J. Ex. 37 ; 2 H & N. 615. . 128 
Gibson v. East India Co. (1839), 6 Bing. N. C. 269 ; 1 Am. 493 ; 7 Scott, 

74 ; 3 Jur. 56 . . . .' 640, 642, 644 

Gibson «. Holland (186.5), 35 L. J. C. P. 5 ; 1 H. & R. 1 ; L. R. 1 C. P. 
1; 11 Jur. N. S. 1022; 13 L. T. 293; 14 W. R. 86 672, 673 

T/ie references are to pages, not to paragraph!. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Ixxxv 

PAQB 

Gibson v. Hunter (1794), 2 H. Bl. 288 ; 6 Bro. P. 0. 235, 255 242 

Gibson v. M'Oarty (1736), Cas. temp. Hardwicke, 311 1 116 

Gibson v. Small (1853), 4 H. L. Cas. 396; 1 C. L. E. 363; 17 Jur. 

1131 770, 771 

Gilbert v. Endean (1878), 9 Ch. D. 259 ; 39 L. T. 404 ; 27 W. B. 252. . . . 914 
Gilbert v. Smitb (18>6), 2 Ch. D. 686 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 514 ; 35 L. T. 43 ; 24 

W. E.. 668 634 

Gilbert v. Sykes (1812), 16 East, 154 ; 14 R. R. 327 682 

Gilchrist v. Bale (1839), 8 Watts, 355 374, 375 

Oildea v. Brien (1821), 10 Ir. C. L. E. 230 865 

Giles V. Dyson (1815), 1 Stark. E. 32 ; 18 E. E. 743 553 

Giles V. Siuey (1864), 3 New R. 78 ; 11 L. T. 310 ; 13 "W. R. 92 1032 

Giles V. Wa'rren (1872), L. E. 2 P. & D. 401 ; 41 L. J. P. 69 ; 26 L. T. 

780; 20 W. R. 827 703, 705 

Gillanders v. Ld. Rossmore (1835), Joues, 504 683 

GiUard ». Bates (1840), 6 M. & W. 547 ; 8 Dowl. 774 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 171 . . 611 

Gillespie v. Camming (1841), Long. & T. 181 1031 

Gillespie «. Moon (1817), 2 Johns. Ch. (Am.), 585 749 

Gillespie v. Russel (1859), 3 Maoq. 757 ; 1 Paterson, 877 1139 

Gillett V. Abbott (1862), 3 N. & P. 24 ; 7 A. & E. 783 ; 2 Jur. 300 ; 1 W. 

W. & H. 89 95 

Gillett V. Gane (1870), L. E. 10 Eq. 29 ; 39 L. J. Ch 818 ; 18 W. E. 423 ; 

22 L. T. 58 798 

Gilliat V. GiUiat (1860), 28 Beav. 481 804 

Gillies V. Smither (1819), 2 Stark. E. 528 1208 

GiUis V. GilHs (1874), I. E. 8 Eq. 597 179 

GiUman®. Connor (1840), 2 Jebb&Sy. 210 36 

Gilpin V. Fowler (1854), 9 Ex. 616 ; 23 L. J. Ex. 152 ; 18 Jur. 292 Ill 

Giraud v. Eiohmond (1846), 2 C. B. 835 ; 15 L. J. C. P. 180 681, 753 

Gisborne v. Hart (1839), 5 M. & W. 50 ; 7 Dowl. 402 ; 3 Jur. 536; 8 

L. J. Ex. 197 1038 

Givens v. Bradley (1813), 3 Bibb, 192 252 

Gladwell v. Turner (1869), 39 L. J. Ex. 31 ; 5 L. E. Ex. 59 ; 21 L. T. 

674 ; 18 W. R. 317 32 

Glannibanta, The (1876), 1 P. Div. 283 ; 34 L. T. 934 ; 24 W. R. 1033 . . 1234 

Glass V. Beach (1833), 5 Verm. 172 324 

Glave D. "Wentworth (1844), 6 Q. B. 173, n 481 

Gleadow v. Atkin (1833), 1 C. & M. 424 ; 3 Tyr. 289 ; 2 L. J. Ex. 163 . . 435, 

445, 461, 462 

Glencairn Peer. (1796). 1 Macq. 444 180 

Glengall, E. of, v. Barnard (1836), 1 Keen, 769 ; 6 L. J. Ch. 26 806 

Glenister v. Harding, In re Turner (1885), 29 Ch. D. 985 ; 54 L. J. Ch. 

1089 ; 63 L. T. 528 420, 1170 

Glenorchy v. Bosville (1733), Cas. temp. Talbot, 3 ; 1 White & T. L. C. 1 665 

Glerawley's, Ld., case (1821), Macq. Prao. H. L. 629 503 

Glossop t). Heston and Isleworth Local Board (1878), 47 L. J. Ch. 536 ; 26 

W. R. 433 911 

Glossop V. Jacob (1815), 1 Stark. N. P. R. 69 ; 4 Camp. 227 16 

Glossop V. Pole (1814), 3 M. & Sel. 176 1102 

Glover (■. Hall (1848), 2 Phillips, 484 1183 

Glubb V. Edwards (1840), 2 M. & Rob. 300 1213 

Glyn V. Caulfield (1851), 3 Mac. & G. 463 ; 15 Jur. 807 599 

Glyn V. Houston (1836), 1 Keen, 329 ; 6 L. J. Ch. 129 997 

Glynn v. Bk. of England (1750), 2 Ves. sen. 38 435, 448 

Goate V. Goate (1856), 1 H. & N. 29 710 

Goblet V. Beechey (1829), 3 Sim. 24 ; Wigr. WIUh, 187 762, 786, 786 

Godard v. Gray (1870), 40 L. J. Q. B. 62 ; L. R. 6 Q. B. 139 ; 24 L. T. 

89 ; 19-W. R. 348 1147 

Goddard's case (1584), 4 Co. Eep. 44 95 

Goddard v. Parr (1865), 24 L. J. Ch. 783 948, 949 

Godefroy v. Dalton (1830), 6 Bing. 460 39 

Godefroy v. Jay (1827), 3 C. ^ P. 192 1031 

Godfrey v. Macaulay (1795), Pea. R. 155, n. ; 3 E. R. 672, n 1096 

Vol- I. ends with page 635. 



Ixxxvi TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAOE 

Godfrey v. Tumbull (1795). 1 Esp. 371 1095 

Godson V. Smith (1818), 2 Moore, 0. P. 157 ; 19 R. R. 533 1115 

Godta V. Rose (1855), 17 C. B. 229 ; 25 L. J. C. P. 61 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 1173. 769 

Godwin v. CuUey (1859), 4 H. & N. 373 7U, 713 

Godwin V. Francis (1870), 39 L. J. 0. P. 121 ; L. R. 6 C. P. 121 ; 22 L. T. 

338 .' 674,773 

Goff V. Gt. North. Ry. Co. (1869), 30 L. J. Q. B. 148 ; 3 E & E. 672 ; 7 

Jur. N. S. 286 ; 3 L. T. 850 643 

GofE V. Mills (1844), 2 Dowl. & L. 23 ; 13 L. J. Q. B. 227 ; 8 Jur. 758 ... 831, 

832, 833 
GofBn V. DoneUy (1881), 6 Q. B D. 307 ; 50 L. J. Q. B. 303 ; 44 L. T. 

141 ; 29 "W. R. 440 ; 45 J. P. 439 865, 869 

Gold Co., Re, The (1879), 12 Oh. D. 77; 48 L. J. Ch. 650; 40 L. T. 865; 

27 W. R. 757 845 

Gold V. Canham (1678-9), cited in note to Kennedy v. Cassillis, 2 Swans. 

325 1154 

Golden v. Gillam (1882), 61 L. J. Ch. 154 ; 46 L. T. 222 ; 20 Ch. D. 389 ; 

51 L. J. Ch. 503 135 

Goldicutt V. Townsend (1860), 28 Beav. 445 679 

Goldie V. Shuttleworth (1807), 1 Camp. 70 475 

Golding v. Wharton Salt Works (1876), 1 Q. B. D. 374 ; 34 L. T. 474 ; 24 

W. R. 423 193 

Goldshede v. Swan (1847), 1 Ex. 154 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 284 786 

Goldstein v. Fosa (1827), 6 B. & C. 154 ; 1 M. & P. 402 ; 2 T. & J. 146 ; 

9 D. & R. 197 ; 4 Bing. 489 ; 2 C. & P. 252 46 

Goldthorpe v. Hardman (1845), 13 M. & W. 377 ; 2 Dowl. & L. 442 ; 14 

L. J. Ex. 61 85 

Gommsj. Parratt (1857), 26 L. J. C. P. 279; 3 C. B. N. S. 47; 3 Jur. 

N. S. 1150 1183 

Gompertz v. Bartlett (1853), 2 E. & B. 849 ; 2 C. L. R. 395 ; 23 L. J. Q. B. 

65; 18 Jur. 266 222, 776 

Goodall D. Little (1851), 20 L. J. Ch. 132 ; 1 Sim. N. S. 155 599, 601, 606 

Goodef. Job (1858), 28 L. J. Q. B. 1: 1 E. & E. 6 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 145.. 721, 966 
Goodered ». Armour (1842), 3 Q. B. 956; 3 G. & D. 206 ; 12 L. J. Q. B. 56 318 

Goodier». Lake (1737), 1 Atk. 446 306 

Goodins;. Smith (1831), MUw. 243 1103 

Goodinge v. Goodinge (1749), 1 Ves. sen. 231 789 

Goodman's Trusts (1880), 14 Ch. D. 619 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 805 ; 43 L. T. 14 ; 

28 W. R. 902 145 

Goodman v. Chase (1818), 1 B. & Aid. 297 ; 19 R. R. 322 677 

Goodman v. Goodman (1859), 28 L. J. Ch. 745 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 902 .... 149, 373 

Goodman v. Griffiths (1857), 1 H & N. 574 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 415 671, 672 

Goodman v. Harrey (1864), 3 New R. 512 1185 

Goodman i> Saltash, Mayor of (1882), 7 Q. B. D. 106 ; 50 L. J. Q. B. 508; 

46 L. T. 120 ; 29 W. R. 639 ; 45 J. P. 844 123 

Goodrich!). Stevens (1871), 5 Lans. (N. T.) 230 763 

Goodright v. Cordwent (1795), 6 T. R. 219 ; 3 R. R. 161 622 

Goodright v. Davids (1778), 2 Cowp. 803 622 

Goodright v. Harwood (1774-5), 2 W. Bl. 937 ; 3 Wils. 497 704 

Goodright ii. Hicks (1801), Buller N. P. 296 ; (nom. Doe v. Walker, 4 Esp. 

N. P. 60) 252 

Goodright v. Hodges (1773), Watkins on Copyholds, 227 ; 2 East, 634, n.. 667 

Goodright v. Moss (1777), 2 Cowp. 891 408, 413, 414, 418, 424, 621 

Goodright J). Saul (1791), 4 T. R. 3.56 ; 2 R. R. 409 422 

Goodright v. Straphan (1774), 1 Cowp. 201, 204 ; Shep. Touch. 53 1206 

Goodtitlev. Baldwin (1809), 11 East, 488; 11 E. R. 249; Preface, v, li., 123, 

269 

Goodtitle v. Braham (1792), 4 T. R. 498 631, 1228 

Goodtitle v. Dew (1802), Pea. Add. Caa. 204 397 

Goodtitle v. Jones (1796), 7 T. R. 47 127 

Goodtitle v. Milburu (1837), 2 M. & W. 853 ; M. & H. 207 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 

209 146 

Goodtitle v. Southern (1813), 1 M. & Sel. 299 801 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED, Ixxxvii 

FAQB 

Goodwin v. Uubbard (1818), 15 Mass. 218, n 667 

Goodwin v. Lordon (1835), 1 A. & E. 378 ; 2 Dowl. P. C. 504 ; 3 N. & M. 

879 870 

Goodwin v. Eobarts (1876), 1 App. Cas. 476 ; 45 L. J. Ex. 748 ; 35 L. T. 

179 ; 24 W. R. 987 6, 643 

Goodwin v. West (1637), Cro. Car. 522 819, 820 

Goodwyn v. Cheveley (1859), 4 H. & N. 631 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 298 ; 33 L. T. 

284; 7 W. R. 631; 1 F. & F. 313 37 

Goold n. "White (1854), Kay, 683 ; 2 Eq. R. 1100 180 

Goom V. Aflalo (1826), 6 B. & C. 117 ; 9 D. & R. 148 297 

Gordon's case (1814), 2 M. & Sel. 582 836 

Gordon's, Lord George, trial (178 1 ), 21 How. St. Tr. 542 377 

Gordon v. Gordon (1871), L. R. 5 H. L. 254 741 

Gordon v. Lord Reay (1832), 5 Sim. 274 701 

Gordon v. Seoretan (1807), 8 East, 548 1211 

Gore, Be (1843), 3 Curt. 758 698 

Gore V. Bethel (1858), 12 Moore, P. C. C. 180 177 

Gore V. Bowser (1851), 5 De G. & Sm. 30 ; S. C, sub nom. Gore v. Harris, 

21 L. J. Ch. 10 ; 15 Jur. 1168 608 

Gore V. Gahagan (1819), Milw. 220 140 

Gore V. Harris {see Gore v. Bowser) . 

Gore V. Hawsey (1862), 3 F. & F. 609 626 

Gore V. Wright (1838), 8 A. & E. 118 ; 3 N. & P. 343 661 

Gorharo v. Canton (1828), 5 Greenl. 266 377 

Gorrissen v. Perrin (1857), 27 L. J. C. P. 29 ; 2 C. B. N. S. 681 ; 3 Jur. 

K. S. 867 763 

Gorton v. Dyson (1819), 1 B. & B. 219 ; 3 Moore (C. P.), 558 1046 

Gosbellj). Archer (1835 ,2 A. & E. 500 729 

Gosford, Ld., i). Robb (1845), 8 Ir. L. R. 217 292, 646 

Goslin V. Corry (1844), 7 M. & Gr. 342 ; 8 Soott, N. R. 21 1231 

Gosling V. Birnie (1831), 7 Bing. 346 ; 5 M. & P. 160 545 

Gobs v. Ld. Nugent (1833), 5 B. & Ad. 64; 2 N; & M. 28; Wigr. Wills, 6; 

2 Ph. Ev. 339 743, 751, 752, 763 

Goss V. Quinton (1842), 3 M. & Gr. 825 ; 4 Scott, N. R. 471 ; 12 L. J. 

C. P. 173 481 

Goss V. Watlington (1821), 3 B. & B. 132 ; 6 Moore, C. P. 365 437, 508 

Gosset K. Howard (1847), 10 Q. B. 453; 16 L. J. Q. B. 345; 11 Jur. 

750 83, 132, 841 

Gott V. Gandy (1863), 2 E. & B. 845 ; 2 C. L. B. 392 ; 23 L. J. Q. B. 1 ; 

18 Jur. 310 774 

Goudy V. Buncombe (1847), 1 Ex. 430 ; 6 D. & L. 209 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 76. . 36 

Gould V. Coombs (1845), 1 C. B. 543 ; 14 L. J. C. P. 175 ; 9 Jur. 494. .. . 1194 

Gould V. Gould (1830), 6 Wend. 263 160 

Gould V. Lakes (1880), 49 L J. P. & M. 59 ; L. R. 6 P. Div. 1 790 

Gould V. Shirley (1829), 2 Moo. & P. 581 712 

Gould (should be Goold) v. White (1864), Kay, 683 ; 2 Eq. Rep. 1100. . , . 180 

Gouldie V. Gunston (1816), 4 Camp. 381 542 

Gouldsworth v. Knights (1843), 11 M. & W. 337 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 283 98 

Gouthwaite, Ex parte (see Be North of England Joint Stock Co.). 

Cover, Ex parte (1876), 45 L. J. Ch. 95 ; 1 Ch. D. 182 ; 33 L. T. 619 ; 24 

W.R.125 1233 

Governor v. Bell (1819), 3 Murph. 331 1178 

Governor v. Jeffreys (1820), 1 Hawks. 207 1178 

Gowan v. Foster (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 507 717 

Grady's case. Re British Provident Life Ass. Socy. (1863), 32 L. J. Ch. 

326; 1 DeG. J. &S. 488 134 

Graham, Be (1863), 32 L. J. P. & M. 113 ; 3 S. & T. 69 704 

Graham v. Birkenhead By. Co. (1850), 2 Mac. & G. 146 ; 12 Beav. 460 ; 

2H. &T. 450 538 

Graham v. Cox (1848), 2 C. & K. 702 164 

Graham ». Dyster (1816), 2 Stark. R. 23 956, 1191 

Graham v. Glover (1855), 25 L. J. Q. B. 10 ; 6 E. & B. 591 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 

160 838 

Vol. I. ends with page 635, 



Ixxxviii TABLE OP CASES CITED. 

PAOB 

Graham v. Hope (1795), Pea. R. 154 ; 3 R. R. 671 1095 

Graham v. Oldis (1858), 1 F. & P. 262 312 

Graham v. Whichelo (1832), 1 C. & M. 188; 3 Tyr. 201 ; 2 L. J. Ex. 

70 660 

Grahame ». Grahame (1887), 19 L. R. Ir. 249 739, 784 

Grand June. Can. Co. v. Dimes (1850), 12 Beav. 63 ; 2 H. & T. 92 ; 2 Mao. 

& G. 285 ; 19 L. J. Ch. 345 1147 

Grant v. Bagge (1802), 3 East, 128 ; 6 R. R. 56 i 18 

Grant «. Pletoher (1826), 5 B. & C. 436 ; 8 D. & R. 59 297 

Grants). Gould (1792), 2 H. Bl. 100; 3 R R. 342 1103 

Grant v. Grant (1839), 2 Curt. 16 603 

Grant v. Grant (1865), 34 Beav. 623 ; 34 L. J. Ch. 641 ; 12 L. T. 721 ; 13 

W. R. 1057 631 

Grant v. Grant (1869), L. R. 2 P. & D. 8 ; 39 L. J. P. & M. 17 ; 21 L. T. 

597 ; 18 W. R. 230 739, 740 

Grant v. Grant (1870), L. R. 5 C. P. 727 ; 39 L. J. C. P. 272 ; 22 L. T. 

821 ; 18 W. R. 951 784 

Grant v. Jackson (1793), Pea R. 204 493, 494, 617, 551 

Grant v. M'Laohlin (1809), 4 Johns. 34 1160 

Grant v. Maddox (1846), 15 M. & W. 737 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 227 763 

Grant v. Moser (1843), 5 M. & Gr. 129 ; 6 Scott, N. R. 46 ; 2 Dowl. N. S. 

923 ; 12 L. J. C. P. 146 ; 7 Jar. 8.54 17 

Grant v. Thompson (1822), 4 Conn. 203 931 

Gravenor v. Woodhouse (1824), 1 Bing. 38 ; 7 Moore, 289 99 

Graves v. Key (1832), 2 B. & Ad. 313 552 

Graves i). Legg (1857), 11 Ex. 642; 2 H. & N 210 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 316 ; 3 

Jur. N. S. 619 157 

Graves i). M'Carthy (1838), Crawf. & D. Abr. C. 127 868, 869 

Graves v. Weld (1833), 5 B. & Ad. 105 ; 2 N. & M. 725 686, 687 

Gray «). Bartholomew, (1894) 14 R. (Feb.) 264; (1896) 1 Q. B. 209 ; 71 

L. T. 867 ; 43 "W. R. 177 . 64 L. J. Q. B. 125 636 

Gray i>. Boswell (1862), 13 Ir. Ch. R. 77 749 

Gray f. Cookson (1812), 16 East, 13 1100 

Gray v. Dinnen (1840), 2 Jebb & Sy. 265 39 

Gray v. Gardner (1807), 3 Mass. 399 122 

Gray*. Haig (1855), 20 Beav. 219 108 

Gray v. Harper (1841), 1 Story, R. 574 783 

Gray v. Palmers (1794), 1 Esp. 135 494 

Gray v. Pearson (1851), 6 H. L. Cas. 106 741 

Gray v. Pentland (1815), 2 Serg. & R. 23 619 

Gray v. Smith (1890), 43 Ch. D. 208 ; 59 L. J. Ch. 145 ; 02 L. T. 335 ; 38 

W. R. 310 .672, 682 

Gray v. Warner (1873), 42 L. J. Ch. 556 ; L. R. 16 Eq. 677 ; 28 L. T. 835 ; 

21 W. R. 808 136 

Gray v. Young (1823), 4 M'C. 31 374 

Grayson v. Atkinson (1752), 2 Ves. sen. 459 ; Dick. 158 700, 1215 

Great Eastern, The (1868), L. R. 2 Adm. 88 ; 17 L. T. 667 179 

Great North. Ry. Co. v. Sheppard (1852), 8 Ex. 30 ; 7 Railw. Caa. 310 ; 21 

L. J. Ex. 286 162 

Great West. Ry. Co. v. Bennett (1867), 36 L. J. Q. B. 133 ; L. R. 2 H. L. 

27 ; 16 L. T. 186 ; 15 W. R. 647 H4 

Great West. Ry. Co. ». WilUs (1865), 34 L. J. C. P. 196 ; 18 C. B. N. S. 

748 388 

Greaves v. Ashlin (1813), 3 Camp. 426 ; 14 R. R. 771 767 

Greaves v. Fleming (1879), 48 L. J. Q. B. 335 ; 4 Q. B. D. 226 ; 27 W. R. 

458 536 

Greaves v. Greenwood (1877), 46 L. J. Ex. 252 ; 2 Ex. D. 289 ; 36 L. T. 

1 ; 25 W. R. 639 171 

Greaves v. Hunter (1826), 2 C. & P. 477 1222 

Greaves v. Legg (185i), 11 Ex. 642 ; 2 H. & N. 210 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 316- 3 

Jur. N S. 619 167 

Greaves v. Tofield (1880), 14 Ch. D. 663 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 118 ; 43 L. T. 100 : 

28 W. R. 840 737 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Ixxxix 

PAOE 

Greely V. Smith (1846), 1 "Woodb. & M. 181 1109, 1138 

Greeni;. Brown (1744), 2 Str. 1199 175 

Green v. CresBwell (1839), 10 A. & E. 453 ; 2 P. & D. 430 .- 678 

Green v. Gatewick (1673), Bull. N. P. '243 330 

Green v. Green (1873), 43 L. J. P. & M. 6 ; L. R. 3 P. & D. 121 1119 

Green v. Howard (1779), 1 Bro. 0. C. 31 789 

Green v. Humphreys (1884), 53 L. J. Ch. 625 ; 26 Ch. D. 474 ; 51 L. T. 

42 711 

Green v. Jackson (1865), Pea. R. 236 160 

Green v. ICopke (1856), 18 C. B. 549 ; 25 L. J C. P. 297 161 

Green v. London Gen. Omn. Co. (1859), 29 L. J. C. P. 13 ; 7 C. B. N. S. 

290 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 228 ; 2 L. T. 95 : 8 W. R. 88 643 

Greene. Ld.Penzince (1881), 6 App. Cas. 657; 51 L. J. Q. B. 25; 45 

L. T. 353 ; 30 "W. R. 218 ; 46 J. P. 115 846 

Green v. New River Co. (1792), 4 T. R. 590 1096 

Green v. Tribe (1878), 9 Ch. D. 231 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 783 ; 38 L. T. 914 ; 27 

W. R. 39 701 

Green «. "Waller (1703), 2 Ld. Raym. 893 8 

Green v. Weaver, (1827), 1 Sim. 404 541 

Greenaway, Ex parte (1802), 6 Ves. 812 • 308 

Greenish v. White (1861), 31 L. J. C. P. 93 ; 11 C. B. N. S. 209 ; 8 Jur. 

N. S. 563 549 

Greenla-w v. King (1838), 3 Beav. 49 601 

Greenough v. Eooles (1859), 5 C. B. N. S. 786 ; 28 L. J. C. P. 160 ; 6 Jur. 

N. S. 766 938 

Greenough ». Gaskell(1833), 1 My. & K. 100; Cooper (temp. Brougham), 

96 591. 593, 594, 606, 008, 610 

Greenough v. M'Clelland (1861), 30 L. J. Q. B. 16 ; 2 E. & E. 424 ; 2 

L. T. 671; 8 W. R. 612; 6 Jur. N. S, 772 758 

Greenshield v. Pritohard (1841), 8 M. & W. 148 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 295 872 

Greenshields v. Crawford (1842), 1 Dowl. N. S. 439 ; 9 M. & W. 314 ; 6 

Jur. 303 1216, 1219 

Greenwich Bd. of Works v. Maudslav (1870), L. R. 5 Q. B. 397 ; 39 L. J. 

Q. B. 205 ; 23 L. T. 121 ; 18 W. R. 948 124 

Gregg's case (1708), 14 How. St. Tr. 1375 558 

Gregg «i. Wells (18.39), 10 A. & E. 98 ; 2 P. & D. 296 637, 542 

Gregory's Settlm., Re (1865), 34 Beav. 600 ; 13 W. R. 828 798 

Gregory ». Doidge (1827), 3 Bing. 474 ; U Moore (C. P.), 394 99 

Gregory v. Howard (1800), 3 E.sp. 113 616 

Gregory v. Marychuroh (1850), 12 Beav. 398 ; 19 L. J. Ch. 289 ; 13 Jur. 

1019 920 

Gregory v. Parker (1808), 1 Camp. 394 ; 10 R. R. 712 504 

Gregory v. Queen's Proctor (1846), 4 Notes of Cases (Eoc. & Mar.), 620 . . 141 

Gregory v. Tavemor (1833), 6 C. & P. 281 927, 928 

Gregory «). Thomas (1811), 2 Bibb, 286 252 

Gregory v. West Mid. Ry. Co. (1864), 33 L. J. Ex. 155 ; 2 H. & C. 944 ; 

10 Jur. N. S. 243 ; 12 W. R. 528 722. 

Gregaon v. Ruck (1843), 4 Q. B. 737 298 

GrelHer v. Neale (1790), 1 Peake, 198 ; 3 R. R. 669 134 

Gremaire v. he Clerk Bois Valon (1809), 2 Camp. 144 150 

Grenfell v. Girdlestone (1837). 2 T. & C. Ex. 676 713 

Gresham Hotel Co. v. Manning (1867), Ir. R. 1 C. L. 125 369 

Gresley v. Mousley (1861), 3 De G. F. & J. 433 ; 31 L. J. Ch. 537 92 

Gresley v. Mousley (1859), 28 L. J. Ch. 620 ; 1 GiflE. 450 ; 4 De G. & J. 

78 136 

Greves, Re (1859), 28 L. J. P. & M. 28 ; 1 S. & T. 250 ; 7 W. R. 86 .... 701 

Greville ». Chapman (1844), 5 ft. B. 731 ; D. & M. 553 934 

Grevilleo. Stulz(1847), 11 ft. B. 1004; 17 L. J. ft. B. 14; 12 Jur. 49.. 347, 1037 

Greyille v. Tylee (1851). 7 Moo. P. C. C. 320 140, 142, 707 

Grew V. Hill (1849), 3 Ex. 801 ; 6 Dowl. & L. 664 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 317 533 

Grey (should be Gray) B. Young (1823), 4 M'C. 31 374 

Grioe v. Richardson (1877), 47 L. J. P. C. 48 ; 3 App. Cas. 319 ; 37 L. T. 

677 ; 26 W. R. 358 689 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



XC TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAGI! 

Griffin v. Brown (1824), 2 Pick. 304 lUw7 

Griffith, In re, Carr v. Griffith (1879), 12 Ch. D. 655 ; 4 1 L. T. 640 139 

Griffith V. Davies (1833), 5 B. & Ad. 602 602, 607 

Griffith V. Kicketts (1849), 7 Hare, 303 ; 19 L. J. Ch. 399 ; 14 Jur'. 326. .321, 942 

Griffiths, Ex parte (1822), o B. & Aid. 730 837 

Griffiths V. Griffiths (1871), L. E. 2 P. & D. 300 ; 41 L. J. P. 14 ; 25 L. T. 

574 ; 20 W. R. 192 700 

Griffiths v. Jenkins (1864), 3 New R.- 489 683 

Griffiths V. Lond. & St. Kath. Docks Co. (1884), 13 Q. B. D. 259 ; 53 L. J. 

Q. B. 504 ; 51 L. T. 533 ; 33 W. E. 35 ; 49 J. P. 100 778 

Griffiths V. Rigby (1856), 1 H. & N. 237 ; 25 L. J. Ex. 284 43 

Griffiths V. WilHams (1787), 1 T. R. 710 506 

Griffits V. Ivory (1840), 11 A. & E. 322 ; 3 P. & D. 179 1226 

Griffits V. Payne (1839), 11 A. & E. 131 ; 3 P. & D. 1079 231 

Grigg's case (1672), T. Eaym. 1 ; 1 Hale, 693 ; 3 Russ. C. & M. 315, 

621 888, 889, 893 

Grill V. Gen. Iron Screw CoUier Co. (1866), L. R. 1 C. P. 600 ; 35 L. J. 

C. P. 321 ; 1 H. & R. 654 ; 14 L. T. 711 ; 14 "W. R. 893 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 

727 347 

Grimani v. Draper (1848), 6 Notes of Cases (Eco. & M.) 421, 441 170, 263 

Grimman v. Legge (1828), 8 B. & C. 324 ; 2 M. & R. 438 660 

Grimwood v. Bartels (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 788 ; 28 W. R. 143 1150 

Grimwood v. Cozens (I860), 2 S. & T. 364 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 497 143 

Grimwood v. Moss (1872), L. R. 7 C. P. 360 ; 41 L. J. C. P. 239 ; 27 L. T. 

268 ; 20 "W. R. 972 622 

GrindeU v. Godmond (1836), 5 A. & E. 756 ; 1 N. & P. 168 ; 2 U. & W. 

339 166 

Grinnell v. Wells (1844), 7 M. & Gr. 1033 ; 8 Scott, N. B. 741 ; 2 Dowl. & 

L. 610 ; 40 L. J. C. P. 19 ; 8 Jur. 1101 253 

Gripper v. Bristow (1840), 6 M. & W. 807 ; 8 Dowl. 797 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 

324 733 

Grissell v. Bristowe (1868), L. R. 4 C. P. 36 ; 38 L. J. C. P. 10 ; 19 L. T. 

N. S. 390 ; 17 W. R. 123 168 

Groenvelt v. Burrell (1696-7), 1 Ld. Raym. 253 ; Garth. 421 987 

Grose v. West (1816), 7 Taun. 39 ; 17 R. R. 437 112 

Grosvenorji. Sherratt (1860), 28Beav. 659 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 1228 137 

Grounsell v. Lamb (1836), 1 M. & W. 352 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 154 222 

Grove V. Ware (1817), 2 Stark. R. 174 317 

Groves v. Groves (1829), 3 T. & J. 170 666 

Guardhouse v. Blackburn (1866), L. R. 1 P. & D. 109 ; 35 L. J. P. & M. 

116; 12 Jur. N. S. 278 ; 14 L. T. 69 ; 14 W. R. 463 140,141 

Gudgen </. Basset (1856), 26 L. J. Q. B. 36 ; 6 E. & B. 986 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 

212 746, 1204 

Guest f . Elwes (1836), 5 A. & E. 126 194 

Guest V. Warren (1854), 23 L. J. Ex. 121 ; 9 Ex. 379 ; 2 C. L. R. 979 ; 18 

Jur. 133 1120 

Guidon V. Robson (1809), 2 Camp. 302 ; 11 R. R. 713 640 

Guier V. O'Daniel (1806), 1 Binn. 349, n 179 

Guild's case (1828), 6 Halst. 168 560, 663, 664, 666, 671 

GuU«. Lindsay (1849), 4 Ex. 45; 18 L. J. Ex. 355 192, 677 

Gully V. Bp. of Exeter (1828), 4 Bing. 298 ; 12 Moore, C. P. 491 302, 614 

Gumm V. Tyrie (1864), 33 L. J. Q. B. 108 ; 4 B. & S. 680 741 

Gun«). McCarthy (1884), 13 L. R. Ir. 304 746, 750 

Gunn V. Roberts (1874), L. R. 9 C. P. 331 ; 43 L. J. C. P. 233 ; 30 L. T. 

424 ; 22 W. R. 652 178 

Gurford v. Bayley (1842), 3 M. & Gr. 781 ; 4 Scott, N. R. 398 ; 1 Dowl. 

N. S. 619; 11 L. J. C. P. 105 190, 192 

Gurney v. Langlands (1822), 5 B. & A. 330 1228 

Gurr V. Button (1816), Holt, N. P. R. 327 373 

Gutsole V. Mathers (1836), 1 M. & W. 502 ; 2 Gale, 64 ; 6 Dowl. P. C. 69 ; 

1 T. & G. 694 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 274 220 

Guy V. Sharpe (1833), 1 Myl. & K. 602 784 

Guy V. West (1808), 2 Sel. N. P. 1244 113 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. XCl 

PAGE 

Guy Mannerinpr, The (1882), 7 P. D. 132 ; 51 L. J. Adm. 57 ; 46 L, T. 

906 ; 30 W. E. 835 ; 4 Asp. M. C. 553 178 

GwiUim v. GwilUm (1860), 29 L. J. P. & M. 31 ; 3 S. & T. 200 698 

Gwynne v. Davy (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 857 751 

Gyles t). HiU(1809), 1 Camp. 471, n 1018 

H., falsely called C. v. C. (1862), 31 L. J. P. & M. 103 128 

Habergham v. Vinoent (1793), 2 Ves. 204 ; 5 T. R. 92 701 

Haokwood v. Lyall (1855), 17 0. B. 124 ; 26 L. J. C. P. 44, n. ; 2 Jur. 

N. S. 44, n 179 

Haddriok v. Heslop (1848), 12 Q. B. 274—277 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 313 ; 12 Jur. 

600 : afe. sub nom. Heslop v. Chapman, 2 C. L. R. 139 ; 23 L. J. Q. B. 

49 ; 18 Jur. 348 30 

Hadley v. Carter (1835), 8 New Hamp. 40 375 

Hadley v. Green (1832), 2 Tyr. 390 ; 1 L. J. Ex. 137 ; 2 C. & J. 374 1123 

Hagedom v. Reid (1813), 3 Camp. 305 ; 1 M. & Sel. 567 454 

Haggitt V. Ineff (1854), 24 L. J. Ch. 120 ; 5 De G. M. & G. 910 ; 1 Jur. 

N. S. 49 ; 3 W. R. 141 ; 3 Eq. 144 1030 

Baig r. Newton (1817), 1 Mill, R. 423 927 

Haigh V. Belcher (1830), 7 C. & P. 389 946 

Haigh V. Kaye (1872), 41 L. J. Ch. 667 ; L. R. 7 Ch. 469 ; 26 L. T. 675 ; 

20 W. R. 697 688 

Haigh V. North Bierley Union (1858), E. B. & E. 873 ; 28 L. J. Q B. 62 . . 641 
Haigh V. West, (1893) 2 Q. B. 19 ; 62 L. J. Q. B. 532 ; 68 L. T. 531 ; 69 

L. T. 166 ; 57 J. P. 368, 630 125 

Hailea v. Marks (1861), 30 L. J. Ex. 389 ; 7 H. & N. 56 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 

851 30, 189 

Haine v. Davey (1836), 4 A. & E. 892 ; 6 N. & M. 356 ; 2 H. & W. 30 . . 227 

Haines v. East India Co. (1856), 6 Moore, Ind. App. 467 543 

Haines v. Guthrie (1884), 13 Q. B. D. 818 ; 53 L. J. Q. B. 621 ; 51 L. T. 

645 ; 33 W. R. 99 ; 48 J. P. 756 419, 645 

Haines v. Roberts (1857), 26 L. J. Q. B. 353 ; 7 El. & Bl. 625 ; 27 L. J. Ex. 

49; 3Jur. N. S 886 114 

Haire v. Wilson (1320), 9 B. & C. 643 ; 4 M. & Ry. 605 82 

Haldane v. Eukford (1869), L. R. 8 Eq. 631 378 

Hale V. Russ (1821), 1 Greenl. 335 1196 

Halkett v. Emmott (1878), 47 L. J. Q. B. 436 ; 3 Q. B. D. 566 ; 38 L. T. 

508 ; 26 W. R. 632 1088 

Hall's Estate, Re (1852), 22 L. J. Ch. 177 ; 2 De G. M. & G. 748 ; 9 Hare, 

App. xvi 10.54 

HaU, Ex parte, Re Whitting (1878), 10 Ch. D. 615 ; 48 L. J. Bank. 79 ; 40 

L. T. 179; 27W. R. 385 651,682 

Hall, Re (1871), L.E. 2 P. &D. 256; 40 L.J. P. &M. 37 671 

Hall D. Bainbridge (1848), 12 Q B. 699 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 317 134 

Hall V. Ball (1841), 3 M. & Gr. 242 ; 10 L. J. C. P. 285 300, 306, 356 

HaU V. Betty (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 410; 5 S.jott, N. R. 608; 11 L. J. C. P. 256. 773 
HaU V. Brand (1883), 12 Q. B. D. 39 ; 53 L. J. Q. B. 19; 49 L. T. 492; 

32 W. R. 133 829, 830 

HaU f. Burgess (1826), 5 B. &C. 332; 8 D. &R. 67 660 

HaU V. Butler (1839), 10 A. & E. 206 ; 2 P. & D. 374 99 

HaU V. Byron (1876), 4 Ch. D. 667, 680 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 297 ; 36 L. T. 367 ; 

25 W. R. 317 lis 

HaU V. Cazenove (1804), 4 East, 477 ; 1 Smith, 272 ; 7 R. R. 61 1 756 

HaU V. City of Loudon Brewery Co. (1862), 31 L. J. Q B. 267 ; 2 B. & S. 

737 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 18 773 

HaU V. Conder (1857), 2 C. B. N. S. 40 ; 26 L. J. C. P. 251 776, 777, 778 

HaU 1). Eve (1876), 4 Ch. D. 341 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 146 ; 35 L. T. 926 ; 25 

W. R. 177 221, 224 

HaU V. Eeatherstone (1858), 3 H. & N. 284 ; 27 L. J. Ex. 308 262 

HaU V. Eisher (1844), 1 CoU. 47 ; 8 Jur. 119 804 

HaU V. HaU (1873), 42 L. J. Ch. 444 ; L. R. 8 Ch. 430 ; 28 L. T. 283 ; 21 

W. R. 373 139 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



XCll TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOE 

HaUi). HiU(1757), 2 Str. 1094 604 

Hall v. HiU (1841), 1 Dr. & War. U6 805, 806, 807, 808 

Hall V. Janson (1855), 4 E. & B. 500 ; 3 C. L. E. 737 ; 24 L. J. Q. B. 97 ; 

1 Jur. N. S. 571 766 

Hall ». Levy (1875), 44 L. J. C. P. 89 ; L. R. 10 C. P. 154 ; 31 L. T. 727 ; 

23 W. E."393 1120 

Hall V. Lund (1863), 32 L. J. Ex. 113 ; 1 H. & C. 676 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 205 ; 

11 W. R. 271 116 

Hall V. Maule (1838), 7 A. & E. 721 ; 3 N. & P. 459 ; 1 "W. W. & H. 399 ; 

2 Jur. 887 132 

Hall v. Mayor of Swansea (1844), 5 Q. B. 526 ; 1 D. & M. 475 ; 13 L. J. 

Q. B. 107 ■•• 643 

Hall J!. Odber(1809), 11 East, 118; 10 R. R. 443 1152, 1155 

HaU ». "Warren (1804), 9 Ves. 605 : 7 R. R. 306 170 

Hallaok v. V. of Cambridge (1841), 1 Q. B. 693 ; 1 a. & D. 100 ; 9 D. P. 

C. 583 ; 6 Jur. 10 132 

Hallen ■„. Runder (1834), 1 C. M. & R. 266 ; 3 Tyr. 959 ; 3 L. J. Ex. 

260 683 

Haller i>. Worman (1860), 2 F. & F. 165 607 

Hallet V. Hears (1810), 13 East, 15 ; 12 R. R. 296 820 

HaUett V. Cousens (1839), 2 M. & Rob. 238 922 

Halley, The (1868), L. R. 2 Ad. & Eco. 3 ; 37 L. J. Adm. 1 ; L. R. 2 P. C. 

193 ; 37 L. J. Adm. 33 ; 18 L. T. 879 ; 16 W. R. 998 178 

HalUday v. Holgate (1861), L. R. 3 Ex. 299 ; 37 L. J. Ex. 174 781 

Halliday v. Martinett (1822), 20 Johns. (Am.) 168 454 

Halllfax V. Lyle (1849), 3 Ex. 446 ; 6 Dowl. & L. 424 90, 547 

Hallmark's case (1878), 47 L. J. Ch. 868 ; 9 Ch. D. 329 ; 38 L. T. 660 ; 26 

W. R. 824 626 

Haly V. La;ne (1741), 2 Atk. 182 546 

Hamber v. Roberts (1849), 7 C. B. 861 ; 18 L. J. C. P. 250 1219 

Hambrook v. Smith (1852), 17 Sim. 209 961 

Hamelin v. Bruck (1847), 9 Q. B. 306 ; 15 L. J. Q. B. 343 ; 10 Jur. 1094. . 1196 

Hamerton v. Hamerton (1828), 2 Hagg. Eoc. R. 8 503 

Hamerton v. Stead (1824), 5 Dowl. & R. 206 ; 2 B. & C. 478 .... 667, 658, 660 
HamQton v. Chaine (1881), 50 L. J. Q. B. 456 ; 7 Q. B. D. 1, 319 ; 29 

W. R. 676 ; 44 L. T. 764 136 

Hamilton f. Nott (1873), 42 L. J. Ch. 512; L. R. 16 Eq. 112 599 

Hamilton v. Terry (1852), 11 C. B. 954 ; 21 L. J. C. P. 132 712 

Hamlyn v. Betteley (1880), 5 C. P. D. 327; 49 L. J. C. P. 466 ; 42 L. T. 

373 ; 28 W. R. 956 ; 44 J. P. 411 136 

Hammersley v. de Biel, Baron (1845), 12 CI. & Fin. 45 639, 674, 679, 680 

Hammiok v. Bronson (1812), 5 Day, 290, 293 373 

Hammond's case (1822), 2 Greenl. 33 1223,1228 

Hammond, Re (1863), 3 S. & T. 90 ; 32 L. J. P. 201 ; 8 L. T. 616 ; 9 Jur. 

N. S. 581 ; 11 W. R. 639 699 

Hammond v. Bradstreet (1854), 23 L. J. Ex. 332 ; 10 Ex. 390 403 

Hammond v. Rogers (1860), 7 Moo. P. C. C. 160 178 

Hammond v. Smith (1864), 33 Beav. 452 712 

Hammond v. Stewart (1734-6), 1 Str. 510 • 815 

Hampden v. Wallis (1884), 27 Ch. D. 251 ; 54 L. J. Ch. 1175 ; 61 L. T. 

357 ; 32 "W. R. 977 624 

Hampden v. Walsh (1876), 1 Q. B. D. 189 ; 43 L. J. Q. B. 238 ; 33 L. T. 

852; 24 W. R. b07 : 620 

Hampshire v. Peiroe (1750), 2 Ves. sen. 216 797 

Hampton V. Spencer (1693), 2 Vem. 288 482 

Hanbury v. EUa (1834), 1 A. & E. 61 ; 3 N. & M. 438 190 

Hancock v. Somes (1859), 8 Cox, C. C. 172 ; 1 E. & E. 795 ; 28 L. J. M. 

C. 198; 6 Jur. N. S. 985 1073 

Hancock «. Welsh (1816), 1 Stark. 347 1113, 1119 

Hand V. Hall (1877), 2 Ex. D. 356 ; 46 L. J. Ex. 603 649 

Handley d. Jones (1836), cited Morgan v. Boys, 7 A. & E. 337 371 

Handley v. Ward (1818), cited 1 Stark. Ev. 188, n. («) 921, 944 

anmer v. Chance (1865), 4 De G. J. & S 626, 631 ; 34 L. J. Ch. 413. .119, 722 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. XCIU 

PAOB 

Hannai Tlie (1866), 36 L. J. Adm. 1 ; L. K. 1 A. & E. 283 ; 15 L. T. 334 ; 

15 W. R. 263 178 

Hannaford v. Hunn (1825), 2 C. & P. 155 1101, 1103 

Hannaford v. Whiteway (1856). 1 C. B. N. S. 63; 26 L. J. C. P. 75 ; 3 

Jur. N. S. 53 156 

Hannay v. Stewart (1837), 6 Watts, 487 388 

Hansard v. Robinson (1827), 7 B. & C. 90 ; 9 D. & R. 860 ; R. & M. 404, n. 307 

Hansom v, Armitage (1822), 5 B. & A. 659 ; 1 D. & R. 128 685 

Hanson's case (1821), Paley on Conv. 282, 283 ; 4 B. & Aid. 521 267 

Hanson v. Parker (1749), 1 Wils. 257 496 

Hanson v. Shaokelton (1835), 4 Dowl. 48 ; 1 H. & W. 342 16 

Hanson v. Stetson (1827), 5 Pick. 506 756 

Harden v. Gordon (1823), 2 Mason, 541,561 652 

Harding v. Greening (1G17), 8 Taun. 42 107 

Harding v. Jones (1835), Tyr. & Gr. 135 615 

Harding v. King (1834), 6 0. & P. 427 1073 

Harding v. Williams (1880), 14 Ch. D. 197 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 661 ; 42 L. T. 

507 ; 28 W. E. 615 1062 

Hardman v. Willoock (1832), 9 Bing. 382, n 545 

Hardwioke, The (1883), 9 P. D. 32 ; 53 L. J. P. D. & A. 23 473, 533 

Hardwick v. Hardwick (1873), L. R. 16 Eq. 168 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 636 ; 21 W. 

E. 719 801 

Hardy's case (1794), 24 How. St. Tr. 451—453 ; 613 

Hardy, Re (1861), 30 L. J. P. & M. 142 142, 747 

Hardy v. Alexander (1837), 2 Stark. Ev. 641, 642, n. (e) 255 

Hare v. Henty (1861), 10 C. B. N. S. 65 ; 30 L. J. 0. P. 302 ; 7 Jur. W. S. 

523 ; 4 L. t. 363 ; 9 W. R. 738 32 

Hare )'. Hyde (1851), 16 Q. B. 394 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 185 ; 15 Jur. 315 .... 870 

Hargest v. Pothergill (1832), 5 C. & P. 303 314 

Hargrave v. Hargrave (1848), 9 Beav. 552 ; 19 L. J. Ch. 261 ; 14 Jur. 212 . . 101, 422 

Hargrave «. Hargrave (1850), 12 Beav. 408 390, 505 

Hargreave v. Everard (1856), 6 Ir. Ch. R. 278 137 

Hargreave v. Spink, (1892) 1 Q. B. 26 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 318 ; 65 L. T. 650 ; 

40 W. E. 254 7 

Hargreaves v. Parsons (1844), 13 M. & W. 561 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 250 679 

Harland v. Morley {see Morley v. Morley). 

Harlook v. Ashberry (1882), 19 Ch. D. 539 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 394; 46 L. T. 

356 ; 30 W. R. 327 75 

Harman v. Anderson (1809), 2 Camp. 243 ; 1 1 R. E. 706 545 

Harman v. Gurner (1866), 35 Beav. 748 792 

Harman v. Reeve (1856), 25 L. J. C. P. 257 ; 18 C. B. 587 688 

Harmart!. Davis (1817), 7 Taun. 577; 1 Moore, C. P. 300 518, 642 

Harmert). Bean (1853), 3 C. & K. 307 294 

Harmerw. Bell (1851), 7 Moo. P. C. C. 267 1103, 1120 

Harmer v. Cornelius (1858), 28 L. J. C. P. 88 ; 5 C. B. N. S. 246 ; 4 Jur. 

N. S. 1110 780 

Harmony, The (1800), 2 C. Eob. Adm. 322 179 

Harnett," In re, Leaby v. O'Grady (1886), 17 L. E. Ir. 543 631 

Harnett v. Vise (I88u), 6 Ex. D. 307 ; 43 L. T. 645 ; 29 W. E. 7 41 

Harnor v. Groves (1866), 15 C. B. 667 ; 3 C. L. E. 406 757 

Harper, Ee (1849), 7 Notes of Cas. (Ecc. & Mar.) 44 709 

Harratt v. Wise (1830), 9 B. & C. 712 ; 4 M. & E. 521 39, 1095 

Harrington v. Fry (1824), Ey. & M. 90 ; 9 Moore, 344 ; 1 C. & P. 289 ; 2 

Bing. 179 1218, 1221 

Harris, Re (1860), 29 L. J. P. & M. 79 ; 1 S. & T. 536 708 

Harris, Ee (1864), 33 L. J. P. & M. 181 ; 3 S. & T. 485 706, 707 

Harris, Ee, Cheese v. Lovejoy (1877), 46 L. J. P. JD. & A 66 ; L. E. 2 P. 

Div. 251 ; 37 L. T. 294 ; 25 W. R. 853 706 

Harris v. Berrall (1858), 1 S. & T. 153 705 

Harris v. Costar (1826), 1 C. & P. 637 162 

Harris v. Gamble (1878), 7 Ch. D. 877 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 344 ; 38 L. T. 253. . 221 
Harris V. Goodwyn (1841), 2 M. & Gr. 408 ; 2 Scott, N. R. 459 ; 9 Dowl. 
409 85, 750 

Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



XCIV TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAQB 

Harris*). Harris (1829), 2 Hagg. Eoc. R. 409 558 

Harris v. Hill (1822), 2 Stark. 140 ; D. & R. N. P. K. 17 321 

Han-is V. Mantle (1789), 3 T. R. S07 220 

Harris v. O'Loghlen (1871), 5 Ir. R. Eq. 514, 520 17 

Harris v. Pepperell (18fi7), L. R. 5 Eq. 1 ; 16 W. R. 68; 17 L. J. Ch. 191 749 
Harris v. Petheriok (1879), 4 Q. B. D. 611 ; 48 L. J. Q. B. 521 ; 41 L. T. 

146 42 

Harris v. Eiokett (1859), 4 H. & N. 6 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 47 529 

Harris v. Ryding (1839), 5 M. & W. 60 114 

Harris v. Saunders (1825), 4 B. & C. 411 ; 6 D. & R. 471 1142, 1153 

Harris v. Tenpanv (1883), 1 0. & E. 65 1196, 1206 

Harris v. Thomps'on (1863), 13 C. B. 333 Ill 

Harris f. Tippett (1811), 2 Camp. 638; 11 R. R. 767 947, 950, 967 

Harris v. Wilson (1831), 7 Wend. 57 494 

Harrison, Ex parte (1852), 16 Jur. 726 ; 19 L. T. 114 1160 

Harrison 0. Barton (1861), 30 L. J. Ch. 216 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 19 ; 9 W. R. 

177 1 39, 787 

Harrison v. Blades (1813), 3 Camp. 458 329, 1209 

Harrison v. Corp. of Southampton (1853), 22 L. J. Ch. 722 ; 4 De G. M. 

&C. 137 149, 295, 1103, 1132 

Harrison v. Creswick (1853), 13 C. B. 399, 416 ; 21 L. J. C. P. 113 ; 16 

Jur. 315 85 

Harrison v. Elvin (1842), 3 Q. B. 117 ; 6 Jur. 849 ; 2 G-. & D. 769 ; 11 

L. J. Q. B. 197 700 

Harrison v. Fane (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 550 48, 49 

Harrison v. Gordon (1838), 2 Lew. C. C. 166 951 

Harrison v. Heathom (1843), 6 M. & Gr. 81 ; 6 Scott, N. R. 735 ; 12 L. J. 

C. P. 203 540 

Harrisons. Hyde (1859), 4 H. &N. 806; 22 L. J. Ex. 119 801 

Harrison 4). Jackson (1877), 7 Ch. D. 339 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 142 753 

Harrison v. Luke (1845), 14 M. & W. 139 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 248 222 

Harrison v. Rowan (1820), 3 Wash. 580 945 

Harrison v. Rowley (1798), 4 Ves. 212 ; 4 R. R. 199 144 

Harrison v. Southcote (1751), 1 Atk. 5?8 962 

Harrison v. Taylor (1860), 29 L. J. Ex. 3 ; 4 H. & N. 815 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 

1219 47 

Harrison v. Turner (1847), 10 Q. B. 482 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 295 ; 11 Jur. 817 480 

Harrison «;. Vallance (1822), 1 Bing. 45; 7 Moore, C. P. 304 496, 511 

Harrison v. Williams (1824), 3 B. & C. 162 995 

Harrison v. Wright (1845), 13 M. & W. 820 ; 2 D. & L. 695 ; 14 L. J. 

Ex. 196 537, 544 

Harrod v. Barred (1854), 1 K. & J. 4 ; 18 Jur. 853 149, 897 

Harry v. Broad (1704), 2 Salk. 626 16 

Hart V. Alexander (1837), 7 0. & P. 749 ; 2 M. & W. 484 ; M. & H. 63 . .1095, 

1096 

Hart V. Bush (1858), 27 L. J. Q. B. 271 ; E. B. & E. 494 692 

Hart V. Deamer (1831), 6 Wend. 497 1102 

Hart*. Frontino, &o.. Gold Min. Co. (1870), L. R. 5 Ex. Ill ; 31 L. J. 

Ex. 93 ; 22 L. T. 30 541 

Hart V. Hart (1842), 1 Hare, 1 ; 5 Jur. 1007 ; 1 1 L. J. Ch. 9 133, 302, 305 

Hart V. Horn (1809), 2 Camp. 92 496 

Hart u. Nash (1835), 2 C. M. & R. 337 ; 1 Gale, 171 ; 6 Tyr. 955 715 

Hart f. Newman (1811), 3 Camp. 13 620 

Harts. Prendergast (1845), 14 M. & W. 741 ; 15 L. J. Ex. 223 . .710, 711, 712 

Hart V. Sattley (1814), 3 Camp. 528 691 

Hart u. Tulk (1862), 22 L. J. Ch. 649 ; 2 De G. M. & G. 300 802 

Hart V. WilUams (1829), 2 Wend. 513 ; . 454 

Hart V. Windsor (1843), 12 M. & W. 68 ; 13 L. J. Ex. 129 ; 8 Jur. 160 . . 774 
Harter v. Harter (1872), 42 L. J. P. & M. 1 ; L. R. 3 P. & D. 11 ; 27 

L. T. 858 ; 21 W. R. 341 141 

Hartford v. Palmer (1819), 18 Johns. (Am.) 143 896 

Hartford v. Power (1869), I. R. 3 Eq. 602 631 

Hartley v. Cook (1832), 5 C. & P. 441 U74 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. XCV 

PAQB 

Hartley v. Hindmarsli (1866), L. R. 1 C. P. 353 ; 35 L. J. C. P. 255 ; 14 

W. R. 862 1132 

Hartleys;. Wharton (1840), 11 A. &E. 934; 3P. &D. 529; 4 Jur. 676. .673, 713 

Hartley?). 'Wilkinson (1815), 4 Camp. 127; 4 M. fcS. 25 755 

Harton, The (1884), 9 P. D. 44 ; 53 L. J. P. D. & A. 25 ; 50 L. T. 370 ; 

32 W. R. 697 ; 5 Asp. M. C. 213 177 

Hartopp V. Hartopp (1855), 21 Beav. 259 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 794 ; 25 L. J. Ch. 

471 136 

Hartshome v. "Watson (1839), 5 Bing. N. C. 477 ; 7 Soott, 494 ; 2 Am. 70 909 

Harty«>. Davis (1850), 13 Ir. L. R. 23. 720 

Harvey's nase (1800), 2 East, P. C. 658 585 

Harvey v. Clayton (1675), 2 Swans. 221, n. ; 19 R. R. 66 592 

Harvey v. Copeland, (1892) 30 L. R. Ir. 412 35 

Harvey i/. Croydon Union, &c. (1884), Court of Appeal, "Times," 14 

Feb., overruling 53 L. J. Ch. 335 507 

Harvey v. Divers (1855), 16 C. B, 497 819 

Harvey v. Famie (1880), 5 P. Div. 153 ; 49 L. J. P. D. & A. 33 1143 

Harvey «;. Farnie (1882), 8 App. Cas. 43 1144 

Harvey v. Grabham (1836), 5 A. & E 61 ; 6 N. & M. 164 753 

Harvey v. Harvey (1884), 26 Ch. D. 644 ; 51 L. T. 508 ; 33 W. R. 76. . . . 868 

Harvey v. MitcheU (1841), 2 M. & Rnb. 366 26, 273, 310 

Harvey v. Morgan (1816), 2 Stark. 17 313 

Harvey v. Mun. Perm. Invest. Build. Soc. (1884), 26 Ch. D. 273 ; 52 L. J. 

Ch. 349 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 1126 ; 61 L. T. 408 ; 32 W. R. 657 663 

Harvey t). Towers (1851), 6 Ex. R. 666 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 318 ; 15 Jur. 544 . . 262 
Harwoodt'. Goodright (1774), 1 Cowp. 91, 92; Lofft, 569; 3 Wils. 497; 

2 "W. Bl. 937 29 

Harwood v. Keys (1832), 1 M. & Rob. 204 496, 514 

Harwood v. Sims (1810), Wightw. 112 401, 410 

Haseldine v. Grove (1842), 3 G. & D. 210 ; 3 Q. B. 997 ; 12 L. J. M. C. 

10 ; 7 Jur. 36 39 

Hasleham t>. Young (1844), 5 Q. B. 833 ; 13 L. J. Q. B. 205; 1 D. & M. 700 161 
Haslock V. Fergusson (1837), 7 A. & E. 86 ; 2 N. & P. 269 ; 1 Jur. 689 . . 719 
Hasluck V. Pedley (1875), 44 L. J. Ch. 143 ; L. R. 19 Eq. 271 ; 23 W. R. 165 139 

Hassard v. Smith (1872), I. R. 6 Eq. 429 170, 263, 1102 

Hastie v. Hastle (1876), 1 Ch. D. 562 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 288 1234 

HastiloTV V. Stobie (1866), 35 L. J. P. & M. 18 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 64 ; 14 

W. R. 211 ; 13 L. T. 473 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 1039 140 

Hastings Peer. (1840), Pari. M. 200 423, 425, 426 

Haswell, The (1864), Brown. & Lush. 247 185 

Hatch «>. Dennis (1833), 1 Fairf. 244 511 

Hatch V. Hatch (1812), 9 Mass. 311 1201 

Hatch «;. Searles (1854),2 Sm. &G. 147; 23 L. J. Ch. 467 ; 24L. J.Ch. 22. . 1205 

Hathaway v. Barrow (1807), 1 Camp. 161 1102, 1109, 1116 

Hathaway v. Haskell (1829), 9 Pick. 42 493 

Hathomi). King (1811), 8 Mass. 371 • 931 

Hatton V. Royle (1868), 27 L. J. Ex. 486 ; 3 H. & N. 600 161 

Havelock v. Rookwood (1799), 8 T. R. 268 1143 

Hawarden v. Dunlop (1861), 2 S. & T. 340; 31 L. J. P. 17 ; 5 L. T. 

765 1045 

Hawea v. Armstrong (1835), 1 Bing. N. C. 765 669 

Hawes !'. Draeger (1883), 23 Ch. D. 173 ; 52 L. J. Ch. 449; 48 L. T. 518; 

31 W. R. 576 101 

Hawes v. Forster (1834), 1 M. & Rob. 368 297, 298 

Hawes v. Watson (1824), 2 B. & C. 540 ; 4 D. & R. 22 645 

Hawk V. Freund (1858), 1 F. & F. 294 474 

Hawkes v. Baker (1829), 6 Greenl. 72 906 

Hawkes v. Salter (1830), 4 Bing. 716 ; 1 M. & P. 750 32 

Hawkesley v. Bradshaw (1880), 49 L. J. Q. B. 333 ; 5 Q. B. D. 302 ; 42 

L. T. 285 ; 28 W. R. 557 535, 536 

Hawkesworth v. Showier (1843), 12 M. & W. 49 ; 13 L. J. Ex. 86 889 

Hawkins ». Gathercole (1860-1), 1 Sim. N. S. 150; 20 L. J. Ch. 303 , 601 

Hawkins v. Howard (1824), Ry. & M. 64 ; 1 C. & P. 222 598 

Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



XCVl TABLE OK CASES CITED. 

PAGB 

Hawkins v. Luaoombe (1818), 2 Swans. 392 496 

Hawkins »'. Warre (1826), 3 B. & 0. 697 286, 288 

Hawks r. Kennebec (1811), 7 Mass. 461 20 

Hawksford«,'.GieFard(1886),12App.Ca3.122; 56L. J.P.C. 10; 66L.T.32.. 1154 

Hayden v. Madison (1830), 7 Greenl 78 524 

Haydon v. WiUiams (1830), 7 Bing. 166 ; 4 M. & P. 811 710, 712 

Hayes, Re (1839), 3 Curt. 338 702 

Hayes 4). Dexter (1861), 11 Ir. 0. L. R. 106 ; 13 Ir. C. L. R. 22 148 

Hayea v. Seaver (1831), 7 Greenl. 237 508 

Haylock v. Sparke (1853), 22 L. J. M. C. 67 ; 1 E. & B. 471 481 

Hayne v. Maltby (1789), 3 T. R. 438 91, 92 

Havnes v. Birks (1804), 3 Bos. & P. 599 32 

Haynes v. Haynes (1866), 35 L. J. Ch. 303 ; 14 L. T. 47 ; 14 W. R. 361.. 101 

Haynes». Hayton (1837). 6 L. E. K. B. (0. S.) 231 481 

Hayues v. Hill (1849), 7 Notes of Cas. 256 701 

Hayaeldent). StafB(ls36), 5A. &E. 153; 6N. &M.659; 2H.&'W. 204...222, 223 

Hayslepj!. Gymer (1834), 1 A. &E. 165; 3N. &M. 479 628 

Hayter v. Tucker (1857), 4 K. & J. 243 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 257 684 

Hayton v. Irwin (1879), 5 C. P. D. 130 ; 41 L. T. 666 ; 28 W. R. 665 . . 766 

Hayward v. Hayward (1854), Kay, Appendix xxxi 844 

Hayward v. Stephens (1867), 36 L. J. Ch. 135 ; 15 L. T. 173 1030 

Ha.zeldine v. Grore (1844), 3 Q. B. 997 ; 3 G. & D. 210 31, 227 

Head v. Baldry (1838), 8 A. & E. 605 132 

Headlam v. Hedley (1810), Plolt, N. P. R. 463 112 

Heald v. Kenworthy (1855), 10 Ex. 743 ; 24 L. J. Ex. 76 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 70 161 

Healey v. Thatcher (1838), 8 C. & P. 388 514 

Healy v. Healy (1875), I. R. 9 Eq. 418 798 

Healy v. Thome (1870), 4 I. R. C. L. 495 124 

Heane v. Rogers (18^9), 9 B. & C. 577 529, 542 

Heap V. Mairia (1876), 2 Q. B. D. 630 ; 46 L. J. Q. B. 761 187, 220 

Heard v. Pilley (1869), L. R. 4 Ch. 548 ; 38 L. J. Ch. 718 ; 21 L. T. N. S. 

68; 17 W. R. 750 729 

Heam, Re (1849), 2 Roberts. 112 ; 7 Notes of Cas. (Eoc. & Mar.) 266 698 

Hearne v. Stowell (1840), -12 A. & E. 719 ; 4 P. & D. 696 ; 6 Jur. 458 46 

Heath's case (1744), 18 How. St. Tr. 68 . .' 367 

Heath v: Brewer (1864), 15 C. B. N. S. 803 ; 9 L. T. 653 226 

Heath v. Crealock (1873), L. R. 15 Eq. 257 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 455 ; 28 L. T. 

101 ; 21 W. R. 380 610 

Heathcote's Divorce (1851), 1 Macq. 277 15, 1172 

Heathcote, In goods of (1881), 6 P. Div. 30 ; 50 L. J. Prob. 42 ; 44 L. T. 

280 ; 29 W. R. 356 ; 45 J. P. 361 701 

Heawood v. Bone (1884), 13 Q. B. Div. 279 ; 51 L. T. 125 ; 32 W. R. 752 ; 

48 J. P. 710 723 

Hebblethwaite v. Hebblethwaite (1869), 39 L. J. P. & M. 15 ; L. E. 2 P. 

& D. 29 881 

Hedges v. Tagg (1872), L. R. 7 Ex. 283 ; 41 L. J. Ex. 169; 20 W. R. 976 253 

Hedley ». Baiubridge (1842), 3 Q. B. 316 ; U L. J. Q. B. 293 ; 2G. &D. 483 160 

Heenan v. Clements (1850), 1 Ir. C. L. R. 44 512 

HefBeld v. Meadows (1869), L. R. 4 C. P. 596 ; 20 L. T. 746 786 

Heiron's case, Re Metropolitan Bank (1880), 15 Ch. D. 139 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 

651 ; 43 L. T. 299 845 

Helby v. Mathewa, (1894) 2 Q. B. 262; 63 L. J. Q. B. 577; 70 L. T. 837; 

42 W. R. 514 ; 68 J. P. 785. H. L. : 11 R. (Aug.) 1 ; 64 L. J. Q. B. 

465 ; 43 W. R. 561 Add. [116] 

Hellinga, Re (1849), 1 Roberta. 753 698 

Helps 1). Clayton (1864), 17 0. B. N. S. 553 ; 34 L. J. C. P. 1 ; 11 L. T. 

476 ; 13 W. R. 161 49 

Helshamj). Blackwood (1851), 11 C. B. Ill; 20 L. J. C. P. 187 1116 

Helyear v. Hawke (1803). 5 Eap. 72 ! 388 

Hemming v. Blanton (1873), 42 L. J. C. P. 158 : 21 "W. R. 636 75 

Hemming v. Maddiok (1872), 41 L. J. Ch. 522 ; L. R. 7 Ch. 395 ; 26 L. T. 

566 ; 20 W. R. 433 954 

Hemming v. Pariy (1834), 6 C. & P. 580 190 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. XCVU 

PAGE 

Hemmings ». Gasson (1858), E. B. & E. 346 ; 27 L. J. Q. B. 252 ; 4 Jur. 

N. S. 834 244 

Hemrainffs !>. Williamson (1883), 10 Q. B. D. 459; 52 L. J. Q. B. 273; 

48 L. T. 392 ; 31 W. R. 336 1177 

Hemphill v. M'Kenna (1845), 8 Ir. L. E. 43 1 109 

Hempston v. Humphreys (1867), Ir. E. 1 C. L. 271 832 

Henderson v. Australian Koyal Mail Steam Navig. Co. (1855), 5 E. & B. 

409; 24 L. J. Q. B. 322; 1 Jur. N. S. 830 642, 645 

Henderson v. Barnewell (1827), 1 T. & J. 387 297 

Henderson v. Broomhead (1859), 4 H. & N. 669 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 360 ; 5 Jur. 

N. S. 1173"; 33L. T. 0. S. 302 865 

Henderson v. Henderson (1843), 3 Hare, 115 1123, 1153, 1154 

Henderson v. Henderson (1848), 6 Q. B. 288 1142, 1147 

Henderson v. Squire (1869), L. B. 4 Q. B. 170 ; 38 L. J. Q. B. 73 ; 10 B. 

& S. 183 ; 19 L. T. 601 ; 17 W. R. 519 774 

Henderson v. Williams, (1895) 1 Q. B. 521 ; 64 L. J. Q. B. 308 ; 72 L. T. 

98 ; 43 W. R. 274 Add. [545] 

Henfree v. Bromley (1808), 6 East, 309 ; 2 Smith, 400 ; 8 B. R. 491 1200 

Henfrsy v. Henfrey (1842), 4 Moo. P. 0. C. 29 ; 2 Curt. 468 704 

Henkin v. Gerss (1810), 2 Camp. 408 ; 12 East, 247 ; 11 R. R. 754 621 

Henley v. Soper (1828), 8 B. & C. 16 ; 2 M. & R. 153 1153 

Henman v. Dickinson (1828), 5 Bin?. 183 ; 2 M. & P. 982 892, 1192 

Henman ». Lester (1862), 31 L. J. C. P. 370 ; 12 C. B. N. S. 781 ; 9 Jur. 

N. S. 601 292, 968 

Hennessy V.Wright (1888), 36W.R.879; o7L.J.Q.B. 594; 59 L. T. 795.. 613, 618 
Henry v. Goldney (1846), 15 M. & W. 494 ; 4 Dowl. & L. 6 ; 15 L. J. Ex. 

298 ; 10 Jur. 439 1115 

Henry v. Lee (1814), 2 Chit. R. 124 926 

Henry v. Leigh (1813), 3 Camp. 499 310, 1047 

Henry v. Risk (1788), 1 Dall. 265 765 

Henry v. Marq. of Westmeath (1843), Ir. Cir. R 809 285 

Henry Coxon, The (1878), 47 L. J. Adm. 83 ; 3 P. Div. 156 ; 38 L. T. 819 . . 455, 

458, 1175 

Hensha-wt). Pleasance (1777), 2 W. Bl. 1174 • 1103 

Kenwood v. OUver (1841), 1 Q. B. 409 ; 1 G. & D. 25 48 

Hepworth v. Hepworth (1870), L. R. 11 Eq. 10 ; 40 L. J. Ch. Ill ; 23 L. 

T. 388 ; 19 W. R. 46 666 

Herbert v. Ashhumer (1750), 1 Wils. 297 992 

Herbert v. Herbert (1855), Deane, Ecc. R. 10 702 

Herbert v. Rae (1862), 13 Ir. Eq. R. 25 133 

Herbert i>. Sayer (1844), 5 Q. B. 965 ; 2 Dowl. & L. 49 ; 13 L. J. Q. B. 

209 ; 8 Jur. 812 664 

Herbert v. Tuckal (1663), T. Raym. 84 417, 422 

Hereford, Bishop of, v. T n (1853), 2 Robei-ts. Eno. R. 695 ; 4 Moore, 

P. C. N. S. 385 77 

Hermann f . Seneschal (1862), 32 L. J. C. P. 43 ; 13 C. B. N. S. 392 • 

6 L. T. 646 ; 11 W. R. 184 226, 227 

Hermes v. Chicago Bay Co. (1891), 27 Am. St. R. 69 377 

Herries Peerage (1858), 3 Macq. 585 ; 2 L. R. H. L. (So.) 258 180 

Herring v. Boston Iron Co. (1854), 1 Gray (Mass.), 134 783 

Herring v. Clobery (1842), 1 Phill. 91 591, 593, 600 

Hervey v. Hervey (1773), 2 W. Bl. 877 373, 426 

Heseltine v. Siggers (1848), 1 Ex. 856 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 166 685 

Heslop V. Chapman (see Haddriok v. Heslop). 

Heston v. St. Bride (1853), 22 L. J. M. C. 65 ; 1 E. & B. 683 1141 

Hetherington v. Hetherington (1887), 12 P-. D. 112; 56 L. J. P. 78; 

67 L. T. 633 ; 36 W. R. 12 ; 51 J. P. 119 102 

Hetherington v. Kemp (1815), 4 Camp. 193 ; 16 R. R. 773 168 

Hetherington v. Longrigg (1879), 48 L. J. Ch. 171 ; 10 Ch. D. 162 ; 

27 W. R. 393 534 

Heugh V. Garrett (1875), 44 L. J. Ch. 305 ; 32 L. T. 45 1183 

Hewitt V. Piggott (1831), 5 0. c& P. 75 485, 626 

Hewlett V. Cook (1831), 7 Wend. 371 429, 433 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



XCVXH TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAGB 

HevUns v. Shippam (1826), 5 B. & C. 229 ; 7 Dowl. & R. 783 637 

He-vrson v. Brown (1760), 2 Burr. 1034 1014 

Hext V. GiU (1872), L. R. 7 Ch. 699 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 761 ; 27 L. T. 291 ; 

20 W. R. 957 114 

Hey V. Moorhouse (1839), 6 Bing. N. 0. 52 ; 8 Soott, 156 288 

Heyea v. Hindle (1863), in Q. B. M. T. 1863, MS 616 

Heyman v. Plewker (1863), 13 C. B. N. S. 519 ; 32 L. J. 0. P. 132 ; 9 Jur. 

N. S. 895 116 

Heyman v. Neale (1809), 2 Camp. 337 297 

Heymann v. R. (1873), L. R. 8 Q. B. 102 ; 12 Cox, C. C. 383 ; 28 L. T. 

162; 21 "W. R. 357 84 

Heysham v. Forster (1829), 6 M. & R. 277 1039 

Heywood v. Pickering (1874), L. R. 9 Q. B. 428 ; 43 L. J. Q. B. 145 33 

Heyworth v. Knight (1864), 17 C. B. N. S. 298 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 866 298 

Hibberd v. Knight (1848), 2 Ex. 11 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 119 ; 12 Jur. 162 . .321, 598 
Hibbert«.Barton(1842), lOM. &W. 683; 2Dowl. N.S.434; 12L.J.Ex.70 733 
Hibblewhite v. M'Morine (1840), 6 M. &W. 214 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 217 . . 683, 684, 

1202, 1204, 1205 
Hibbs V. Ross (1866), L. R. 1 Q. B. 534 ; 35 L. J. Q. B. 193 ; 12 Jur. 

N. S. 812 ; 15 L. T. 67 ; 14 W. R. 914 178, 1175 

Hickey, In re (1875), Ir. R. 10 Eq. 117 155 

Hickey v. Burt (1816), 7 Taun. 48 ; 17 R. R. 440 487 

HLckey v. Campion (1872), Ir. R. 6 C. L. 557 631, 881 

Hickey v. Hayter (1795), 1 Esp. 313 ; 6 T. R. 384 ; 3 R. R. 213 553 

Hickman ». Haynes (1875), L. R. 10 C. P. 598; 44 L. J. C. P. 358; 32 

L. T. 873 ; 23 W. R. 872 752 

Hickman v. Maohin (1859), 4 H. & N. 716 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 310; 5 Jur. 

N. S. 576 98 

Hickman v. Upsall (1877), 4 Ch. D. 144 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 245 ; 35 L. T. 919 ; 

26 W. R. 175 172 

Hicks, Re (1869), 38 L. J. P. & M. 65 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 683 ; 21 L. T. 

300 702 

Hicks 1!. Duke of Beaufort (1838), 4 Bing. N. C. 229; 5 Soott, 698; 

1 Arn. 56 ; 2 Jur. 255- 521 

Hicks V. Faulkner (1881), 8 Q. B. D. 167 ; 51 L. J. Q. B. 268 ; 30 "W. R. 

545 ; afad. 46 L. T. 127 ; 46 J. P. 420 29 

Hicks V. Sallitt (1864), 23 L. J. Ch. 571 ; 3 De G. M. & G. 782 74], 789 

Hickton ». Antrobus (1846), 2 C. B. 82 ; 1 Lutw. Reg. Cas. 363 1.56 

Hide, Re (1871), L. R. 7 Ch. 28 ; 41 L. J. Bank. 6 662 

Hidet). Thornboroiigh (1840), 2 C. &Kir. 250 114 

Higgins' Trusts, Re (1861), 2 GifE. 562 ; 30 L. J. Ch. 405 532 

Higgins V. Hopkins (1848), 3 Ex. 163; 6 Railw. Cas. 75 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 113 541 

Higgins ». Scott (1832), 2 B. & Ad. 413 79 

Higgins «!. Senior (1841), 8 M. & W. 844; 11 L. J. Ex. 199 758, 759 

Higginson v. Clowes (1808). 15 Vea. 616 ; 10 R. R. 112 750 

Higginson v. Simpson (1877), 46 L. J. C. P. 192 ; 2 C. P. D. 76 ; 36 

L. T. 17 ; 25 W. R. 303 620 

Higgs V. Dixon (1817), 2 Stark. 180 12u7 

Hisgs V. Maynard (1866), 1 H. & R. 681 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 705 ; 14 L. T. 

332 ; 14 W. R. 610 163 

Higham v. Ridgway (1808), 10 East, 109 ; 2 Smith, L. C. 270 ; 10 R. R. 

235 ; Preface, v 434, 435, 437, 438, 439, 441 

Highfield v. Peake (1827), M. & M. 109 956, 1013, 1036 

Highland Turnp. Co. v. McKean (1813), 10 Johns. 154 1175 

Hiliard «. Phaley (1723), 8 Mod. 180 ""'" 49.5 

Hill, Re (1849), 1 Roberts. 276 698 702 

Hill V. Campbell (1872), 44 L. J. C. P. 97 ; L. R. 10 C. P. 222 ; 32 L T ' 

59 ; 23 W. R. 336 1182 

Hill V. Coombe (1818), cited 1 Stark. Ev. 188, n. (n) 921 944 

Hill V. Crook (1873), 42 L. J. Ch. 702 ; L. R. 6 H. L. 266 ; 22 W. r' 137 ■ ' 

24 L. T. 488 739 

HilL V. Dolt (1867), 7 De G. M. & G. 397 '.'.'.'.'." 812 

Hill V. Hart- Davis (1884), 26 Ch. D. 470 ; 53 L. J. Ch. 1012 ; 51 L T 279 914 
Hill V. Hennigan (1877), I. R. 11 C. L. 622 130 

The referenms are to pages, not to parai/raphx. 



TABLE OF OASES CITED. XCIX 

PAGE 

Hill V. Manchester "Waterw. Co. (1831), 2 B. & Ad. 552, 553 ; 2 N. & M. 

573 91, 92, 93 

Hill V. Packard (1830), 6 "Wend. 387 1018 

Hilli). Philp (1852), 7 Ex. 232; 21 L.J. Ex. 82; 16 Jur. 90 1187 

Hill i: Ratley (1862), 31 L. J. Ch. 380 ; 2 J. & H. 63t 144 

Hill V. Salt (1834), 2 0. & M. 420 ; 4 Tyr. 271 ; 3 L. J Ex. 84 193 

Hill V. Thompson (1817), 3 Mer. 630 ; 2 Moore, 424 ; 8 Taun-. 375 ; Holt, 

636 43 

Hillary v. Waller (1805), 12 Ves. 239, 252 126 

Hills V. Evans (1862), 31 L. J. Ch. 461, 462 ; 4 De G. P. & J. 288 ; 6 L. T. 

90 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 526 43 

Hills ff. Laming (1854), 9 Ex. 256 ; 23 L. J. Ex. 60 93 

Hills V. London Gas Co. (1858), 27 L. J. Ex. 60 ; (1860), 5 H. & N. 312 ; 

29 L. J. Ex. 409 43 

Hillyard v. Grantham (1750), cited 2 Ves. sen. 246 1116 

Hilton V. Fairolough (1811), 2 Camp. 633 : 12 R. R. 766 321 

Hilton V. Giraud (1847), 1 De G. & Bm. 187 ; 16 L. J. Ch. 285 ; 11 Jur. 838 693 

Hindekoper v. Cotton (1834), 3 Watts, 56 616 

Hindley v. Haslam (1878), 3 Q. B. D. 481 ; 27 W. R. 61 1119 

Hindmarsh, Re (1860), 1 Drew. & Sm. 129 713 

Hindmarsh v. Charlton (1861), 8 H. L. Cas. 160 695, 700 

Hindos. China and Japan, Bk. of, v. Smith (1867), 36 L. J. C. P. 241 1198 

Hindson v. Kersey (1765), 4 Bum, Eco. L. 118 1215 

Hindustan, Bk. of, Re, Pricker's case (1871), L. R. 13 Eq. 178 ; 41 L. J. 

Ch. 278 845 

Hinton V. Heather (1846), 14 M. & W. 134 ; 15 L. J. Ex. 39 30 

Hlpgrave v. Case (1886), 28 Ch. D. 356 ; 54 L. J. Ch. 399 ; 52 L. T. 242 192 
Hirsohfield v. Smith (1841), 1 H. & R. 284, 288 ; L. R. 1 C. P. 340 ; 35 

L. J. C. P. 177; 12 Jur. N. S. 523 31 

Hirst V. Hannah (1861), 17 Q. B. 383 732 

Hitch V. WeUs (1846), 10 Beav. 84 697 

Hitchin v. Campbell (1771-2), 2 W. Bl. 827 ; 3 Wils. 304 .... 1118, 1120, 1122, 

1139 

Hitchin v. Groom (1848), 2 M. & W. 816 801 

Hitohings v. Thompson (1850), 5 Ex. 60 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 146 99 

Hitchins v. Eardley (1871), L. R. 2 P. & D. 248 ; 40 L. J. P. & M. 70. .26, 414 

Hitohins e. Hitchins (1866), L. R. 1 P. &D. 153 ; 35 L. J. P. & M. 62 347 

Hoad V. Grace (1862), 31 L. J. Ex. 98 ; 7 H. & N. 494 786 

Hoare v. Coi'yton (1812), 4 Taun. 660 147, 498 

Hoare v. Graham (1811), 3 Camp. 57 ; 13 R. R. 752 756 

Hoare v. Johnstone (1838), 2 Keen, 553 ; 7 L. J. Ch. 207 495 

Hobhs». Henmng(1864), 17 0. B. N". S. 791; 34L. J. C. P. 117 1149 

Hobbs V. Knight (1838), 1 Curt. 768 706, 707, 708 

Hobhouse v. Hamilton (1803), 1 Sch. & Lef. 207 ; 2 Sch. & Lef. 28 1069 

Hobsons. Parker (1753-4), Barnes, 237 ; cited in 3 T. R. 142 ; 1 R. R. 673 . . 994 

Hobson V. Thellusson (1867), 36 L. J. Q. B. 302 ; L. R. 2 Q. B. 642 639 

Hoby V. Roebuck (1816), 7 Taun. 167 682 

Hockin ». Cooke (1791), 4 T. R. 314 16, 766 

Hodenpyl v. Vingerhoed (1818), Chitty on Bills, 627, n. (?) 386 

Hodgeus V. Graham (1831), Ale. & Nap. 49 712 

Hodges V. Anoram (18661, 11 Ex. 214 ; 24 L. J. Ex. 257 944 

Hodges V. Bennett (I860), 6 H. & N. 625 ; 29 L. J. M. C. 224 630 

Hodges V. Cobb (1867), 36 L. J. Q. B. 266 ; L. R. 2 Q. B. 662 ; 8 B. & S. 

683 ; 16 L. T. 792 ; 15 W. R. 1038 347 

Hodges V. Holder (1813), 3 Camp. 366 270 

Hodgkinson v. Fletcher (1781), 3 Doug. 31 118 

Hodgkinson v. Kelly (1868), 37 L. J. Ch. 837 ; L. R. 6 Eq. 496 ; 16 W. R. 

1078 168 

Hodgson's ease (1830), 1 Lew. C. C. 102—104 246 

Hodgson, In re, Beckett v. Ramsdale (1886), 31 Ch. D. 177 ; 65 L. J. Ch. 

241; 64L. T. 222; 34 W. R. 127 631 

Hodgson V. Clarke (1860), 1 De G. F. & J. 394 ; 1 Giff. 139 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 

1024 798 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



C TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

TACB 

Hodgson V. Davies (1810), 2 Camp. 532 ; 11 R. K. 789 707 

Hodgson ». De Beauoliesne (1858), 12 Moo. P. C. C. 285, 317 179, 378 

Hodgson V. Hutchenson (1712), 5 Vin. Abr. 622 539, 680 

Hodgson V. Johnson (1859), 28 L. J. Q. B. 88 ; E. B. & E. 685 ; 6 Jur. 

N. S. 290 682 

Hodgson V. Le Bret (1808), 1 Camp. 223 690 

Hodgson D. Merest (1821), 9 Price, 563 496 

Hodgson V. Scarlett (1813), 1 B. & Aid. 232, 245, 246 Ill 

Hodnett v. Eorman (1815), 1 Stark. 90 1213 

Plodson V. Mid. Gt. W. Ry. Co. (1877), I. R. 11 C. L. 109 1232 

Hoe V. Nathrop {or Nelthorpe) (1697), 3 Salk. 154 ; 1 Ld. Ray. 154 . .1046, 1052 

Hoffman v. Smith (1803), 1 Caines, 157 595 

Hogarth V. Latham (1878), 3 Q. B. D. 643 ; 47 L. J. Q. B. 339 ; 39 L. T. 

75 ; 26 W. R. 388 \ 1205 

.Hogg V. Garrett (1849), 12 Ir. Eq. R. 559 389 

Hogg V. Skeen (1866), 34 L. J. C. P. 153 ; 18 0. B. N. S. 426 ; 11 Jur. 

N. S. 244 ; 12 L. T. 709 ; 13 W. R. 383 262 

Hoghton V. Hoghton (1872), 15 Beav. 278 ; 21 L. J. Ch. 482; 17 Jur. 99. .137, 

506, 514 

Holbard v. Stephens (1841), 5 Jur. 71 286 

Holbeckj;.Holbeck(1849), 7Noteaof Cas. 294 (Eoc. &Mar.); 2Roberts. 126 698 

Holbrook v. Tirrell (1829), 9 Pick. 109 659 

Holoombe v. Hewson (1810), 2 Camp. 291 ; 11 R. R. 746 230 

Holcroft's case (1577-8), 4 Co. Rep. 46 b 1129 

Holcroft V. Barber (1813), 1 C. & K. 4 153 

Holoroft, LadY, v. Smith (1702), 2 Freem. 259 1214 

Holden, Re, Ex parte BoUand (1874), L. R. 19 Eq. 131 : 43 L. J. Bk. 9 ; 

31 L. T. 445 ; 23 W. R. 24 849 

Holden V. Ballantyne (1860), 29 L. J. Q. B. 148 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 451 194 

Holden v. Holden (Hill v. Dolt) (1857), 7 De G. M. & G. 397 812 

Holden v. King (1876), 46 L. J. Ex. 75 ; 35 L. T. 497 ; 25 W. R. 62 . . . . 1073 

Holder r. Coates (1827), M. & M. 112 114 

Holder v. Snulby (1860), 29 L. J. C. P. 246 ; 8 C. B. N. S. 254 ; 6 Jur. 

N. S. 1031 ; 8 W. R. 438 162 

Holdfast V. Dowsing (1746), 2 Str. 1254 ; Ball. N". P. 264 1215 

Holding V. Elliott (1850), 39 L. J. Ex. 1.34 ; 5 H. & N. 117 520, 758 

Holding V. Pigott (1831), 7 Bing. 465 ; 5 M. & P. 427 781 

Holdsworth v. Davenport (1876), 46 L. J. Ch. 20 ; 3 Ch. D. 185 ; 35 L. T. 

319 ; 25 W. R. 20 * 684 

Holford V. BaQey (1850), 13 Q. B. 427 ; 18 L. J. Q. B. 109 ; 13 Jur. 278.. Ill 
Holgate, Re (1859), 1 S. & T. 261 ; 29 L. J. P. 161; 5 Jur. N. S. 251 ; 17 

W. R. 19 697 

Holgate V. Slight (1851), 2 L. M. & P. 662 ; 21 L. J. Q. B. 74 732 

Holiday v. Pitt (1814), 2 Str. 986 ; Gilb. R. 308 867 

HoU t: Griffin (1833), 10 Bing. 246 ; 3 M. & Sc. 732 545 

Holland ». Reeves (1835), 7 C. & P. 705 485, 929 

Hollidav v. Atkinson (1826), 5 B. & C. 501 ; 8 D. & R. 163 133 

Hollingham v. Head (1858), 27 L. J. 0. P. 241 ; 4 C. B. N. S. 388 ; 4 Jur. 

N. S. 379 230, 241 

HoUins V. Verney (1884), 13 Q. B. D. 304 ; 53 L. J. Q. B. 430 ; 51 L. T. 

753 ; 33 W. R. 5 ; 48 J. P. 580 76 

Hollis V. Goldfinch (1823), 2 D. & R. 316 ; 1 B. & C. 205 236 

HoUoway v. Rakes (1772), cited Davies r. Pierce, 2 T. R. 55; 1 R. R. 419 445 

Holman v. Burrow (1702), 2 Ld. Raym. 795 16, 18 

Holman v. Pullin (1884), C. & E. 254 780 

Holme p. Brunskill (1877), 3 Q. B. D. 495 ; 47 L. J. Q. B. 610 ; 38 L. T. 

838 523 

H.lmes V. Baddeley (1844), 1 Phill. 476 : 14 L. J. Ch. 113 ; 9 Jur. 289 . . 601 
Holmes V. Bellingham (1859), 7 0. B. N. S. 329 ; 29 L. J. M. C. 132 ; 6 

Jur. N. S. 531 112 

Holmes V. Clifton (1839), 10 A. & E. 673 549 

Holmes V. Hoskins (1854), 9 Ex. 753 689. 690 

Holmes «;. MackreU (1858), 3 0. B. N. S. 789; 30 L. T. (0. S.) 243.... 674, 713 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CI 

PAQB 

Holmes V. MUward (1878), 47 L. J. Ch. 622 ; 38 L. T. 381 ; 26 W. E. fi08.. 133 
Holmes v. MitoheU (1869), 48 L. J. 0. P. 301 ; 7 0. B. N. S. 361 ; 6 Jur. 

N. S. 73 670, 676 

Holmes v. Staines (1860), 3 C. & Kir. 19 821 

Holt V. CoUyer (1881), 16 Ch. D. 718 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 311 ; 44 L. T. 214 ; 

29 W. E. 602 741 

Holt V. Jesse (1876), 3 Ch. D. 177 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 264 ; 24 W. K. 879 .... 608 

Holt V. Miers (1839), 9 C. & P. 195 314, 1032 

Holt V. Pie (1888), 120 Pa. St. 439 741 

Holt V. Squire (1825), Ry. & M. 282 , 505 

Homan v. Thompson (1834), 6 C. & P. 717 271 

Home V. Bentinck (1820), 2 B. & B. 162 614, 618 

Homer v. Homer (1878), 47 L. J. Ch. 635 ; 8 Ch. D. 758 ; 39 L. T. 3, 27 803 

Homer v. Wallis (1814), 11 Mass. 309 •. 1223 

Homersham v. Wolverhampton Waterworks Co. (1851), Ex. 137 ; 6 

Railw. C. 790 642, 645 

Honiball v. Bloomer (1854), 10 Ex. 538 ; 24 L. J. Ex. 11 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 

188 1068 

Hood V. Ld. Barrington (1868), L. R. 6 Eq. 218 671, 1045 

Hood V. Lady Beauohamp (1836), Hubb. Ev. of Suco. 468 420, 423 

Hood V. Reeve (1828), 3 C. & P. 632 498 

Hooper v. Gumm (1862), 2 J. & H. 602 ; 10 W. R. 644 : 6 L. T. 891 .... 699 

Hooper v. Stephens (1835), 4 A. & E. 71 ; 7 C. & P. 260 715 

Hopcraft v. Keys (1833), 9 Bin^. 613 ; 2 M. & Scott, 760 98 

Hope V. Beadon (1851), 2 L. M. & P. 593 ; 17 Q. B. 509 ; 21 L. J. Q. B. 

25 ; 16 Jur. 80 315 

Hope V. Hope, (1893) W. N. 1893, at p. 20 463, 465 

Hope V. Liddell (1865), 24 L. J. Ch. 694 ; 7 De G. M. & G. 338 321 

Hopewell v. De Pinna (1809), 2 Camp. 113 172 

Hopkins V. Crowe (1836). 4 A. & E. 774 ; 2 H. & W. 21 227 

Hopkins v. Grazebrook (1826), 6 B. & C. 31 ; 9 Dowl. & R. 22 773 

Hopkins v. Logan (1839), 5 M. & W. 248 ; 7 Dowl. 360 ; 8 L. J. Ex. 

■218 387, 716 

Hopkins v. Ware (1869), L. R. 4 Ex. 268 : 38 L. J. Ex. 147 ; 20 L. T. 147 32 
Hopper V. Warburton (1863), 32 L. J. Q. B. 104 ; 7 L. T. 722 ; 11 W. R. 

384 191, 196 

Hopwood V. Hopwood (1860), 26 L. J. Ch. 292 ; 22 Beav. 4^8 ; 29 L. J. Ch. 

747 ; 7 H. L. Cas. 728 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 897 806 

Hordem v. Commercial Union (1887), 56 L. J. P. C. 78 ; 66 L. T 240. .. . 48 
Horn V. Thornborough (1849), 3 Ex. 846 ; 6 Dowl. & L. 651 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 

349 , 39, 227 

. Home V. Mackenzie (1839), 6 01. & Fin. 628 924 

Home V. Smith (1815), 6 Taun. 9 ; 1 Marsh. 410 ; 3 East, 16, n. {a) ; 16 

R. R. 558 819, 832 

Home V. Swinford (1822), 1 D. & R. Mag. Cas. 361 868 

Horner «). Horner (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 617; 47 L. J. Ch. 635; 8Ch.D. 758.. 803 
Hornsby ii. Robson (should be Bolton) (1856), 1 C. B. N. S. 63 ; 26 L. J. 

C. P. 56 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 674 156 

Horrocks v. Metrop. Ry. Co. (1863), 4 B. & S. 315 ; 32 L. J. Q. B. 367 ; 10 

Jur. N. S. 204 ; 8 L. T. 663 ; 11 W. R. 910 1102 

Horsefall v. Hodges (1824). 2 Coop. 115 673 

Horsey v. Graham (1869), L. R. 6 C. P. 9 ; 39 L. J. 0. P. 58 ; 21 L. T. 

639 ; 18 W. R. 141 682 

Horsfall v. Hey (1848), 2 Ex. 778 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 266 688 

Horsford, Re (1874), 44 L. J. P. & M. 9 ; L. R. 3 P. & D. 211 ; 31 L. T. 

553 ; 23 W. R. 211 707 

Horton v. M'Murtry (1860), 29 L. J. Ex. 265 ; 6 H. & N. 667 ; 8 W. R. 285 202 
Horton v. Westminster Improvement Comrs. (1862), 7 Ex. 780 ; 21 L. J. 

Ex. 297 ' 91, 93 

Horwood, In re (1886), 66 L. T. 373 914 

Horwood V. Griffith (1864), 23 L. J. Ch. 466 ; 4 De G. M & G. 700 . . 785, 789 

Hospital for Incurables, In re (1884), 13 L. R. Ir. 361 1012 

Hotson ff. Browne (1860), 30 L. J. C. P. 106 ; 9 0. B. N. S. 442 747 

Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



Cll TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FA OB 

Hough V. Manzanos (1879), 48 L. J. Ex. 398 ; 4 Ex. D. 104 768 

Houghton, Ex parte (1810), 17 Ves. 251 ; 11 B. B. 73 666 

Houg-htoiiB. Kcenig(1856), 18C. B. 235; 25 L. J. C. P. 218 300 

Houlden v. Smith (1850), 14 Q. B. 841 ; 19 L. J. Q. B. 170 ; 14 Jur. 598. . 1099 
Houlditch V. M. of Donegal (1834), 8 BUgh, N. B. 337 ; 2 01. & Fin. 

476 1142, 1146, 1147, 1153, 1156 

HouHston V. Smyth (1825), 2 0. & P. 24 ; 3 Bing. 127 ; 10 Moore, 0. P. 482 147, 

375 1032 
Household Fire, &o. Ins. Co. v. Grant (1879), 48 L. J. Ex. 677 ; 4 Ex. D.' 

216; 41L. T. 298; 27 W. B. 858 165 

Houseman v. Eoberts (1832), 6 0. & P. 394 312 

Houston V. Sligo, Marquis of (1885), 29 Oh. D. 448 ; 52 L. T. 96 1110, 1117 

How V. Hall (1811), 14 East. 274 ; 12 B. B. 515 289, 318, 319 

Howard 1'. Beal (1889), 23 Q. B. D. 1 ; 58 L. J. Q. B. 384 ; 60 L. T. 637 ; 

37 W. E. 555 1062 

Howard v. Oanfield (1836), 6 Dowl. 417 927 

Howard v. Duoane (1823), 1 Turn. & E. 86 ; 1 L. J. Ch. 0. S. 85 8 

Howard v. Hudson (1853), 2 B. & B. 1 ; 22 L. J. Q. B. 341 ; 17 Jut. 856. . 538, 

648 

Howard v. Maitland (1883), 11 Q. B. D. 695 ; 53 L. J. Q. B. 42 773 

Howard v. MiteheU (1817), 14 Mass 241 89 

Howard v. Newton (1843), 2 M. & Bob. 509 237 

Howard v. Peete (1817), 2 Ohitly, B. 315 201 

Howard v. Sheward (1866), 36 L. J. C. P. 42 ; L. B. 2 0. P. 148 ; 15 L. T. 

183; 15 W. E. 45 230, 388 

Howard v. Smith (1841), 3 M. & Gr. 254 ; 3 Scott, N. E. 574 291 

Howard v. WUliams (1842), 9 M. & W. 725 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 877 ; 6 Jur. 585 314 

Howard v. "Wright (1823), 2 Coop. 114 750 

Howoutt V. Bonser (1849), 3 Ex. 491 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 262 721, 722 

Howe V. Hall (1870), I. B. 4 Eq. 242 688 

Howe V. Palmer (1820), 3 B. & Aid. 321 689 

Howe V. Scarrott (1859), 4 H. & N. 723 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 325 98 

Howe V. Walker (1855), 70 Mass. (4 Gray) 318 757 

Howell, Be (1848), 6 Notes of Oas. (Eco. & Mar.) 20, 406 698 

Howell V. Look (1809), 2 Camp. 14 909 

Howes ®. Barber (1852), 18 Q. B. 588 ; 21 L. J. Q. B. 264 ; 16 Jur. 614 . '. 819 
Howlett V. Tarte (1861), 10 0. B. N. S. 813 ; 31 L. J. C. P. 146 ; 19 W. E. 

868 1120 

Hoyle, Be, Hoyle v. Hoyle, (1892) 41 W. E. 81 : reversing 67 L. T. 254. . 673 

Hoyle V. Lord Comwallis (1720), 1 Str. 387 16 

Hubbard ». Alexander (1876), 3 Ch. D. 738 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 740 ; 35 L. T. 62 ; 

24 "W. E. 1058 805 

Hubbard v. Johnstone (1810), 3 Tann. 209 29 

Hubbard v. Lees (1866), 35 L. J. Ex. 169 ; L. B. 1 Ex. 255 ; 4 H. & 0. 

418 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 435 ; 13 L. T. 367 ; 14 W. B. 694 423, 693 

Hubbart v. PhiUips (1846), 13 M. & W. 703 ; 2 Dowl. & L. 707 ; 14 L. J. 

Ex. 103 1112 

Huber v. Steiner (1835), 2 Soott, 304 ; 2 Bing. N. 0. 202 ; 2 Dowl. P. C. 

781 ; 1 Hodges, 206 62 

Hubert v. Moreau (1826), 2 C. & P. 528 ; 12 Moore (0. P.), 216 675 

Hubert v. Treheme (1842), 3 M. & Gr. 743 ; 4 Scott, N. E. 486 ; Car. & 

M. 351 ; 11 L. J. 0. P. 78 674 

Hubert's Case (1666), 6 How. St. Tr. 807 ; Wills, Ch-. Ev. 70 557 

Huckman v. Fimie (1838), 3 M. & W. 605 ; 1 H. & H. 149 ; 2 Jur. 444 ; 

7 L. J. Ex. 163 272 

Huckvale, Be (1867), 36 L. J. P. & M. 84 ; L. E. 1 P. & D. 375; 16 L. T. 

434 ; 16 W. B. 64 698 

Hudson V. Guestier (1848), 4 Oranch, 293 1150 

Hudson V. Parker (1844), 1 Boberts. 24 695, 696, 697 

Hudson V. Bevett (1829), 6 Bing. 368 ; 2 M. & P. 663 1204 

Hudson V. Tahor (1877), 2 Q. B. D. 290 ; 46 L. J. Q. B. 463 ; 36 L. T. 

492 ; 26 W. B. 740 397 

Hudson j>. Tooth (1877), 2 P. D. 125 ; 35 L. T. 820 846 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CUl 

PAOG 

Huetp. LeMeaurier (1786), 1 Cox, Ch. 275 1048 

HufEell V. ArmitBtoad (1835), 7 C. & P. 66 35 

Huggins V. Ward (1873), 8 Q. B. D. 621 ; 29 L. T. 33 ; 21 "W. E. 914.. 266, 1008 

Hughes' case (1802), 2 East, P. 0. 1002 278 

Hughes' Patent, Re (1879), 48 L. J. P. 0. 20 ; 4 App. Cas. 174 ; 27 W. E. 

493 129 

Hughes V. Biddulph (1827), 4 Buss. 190 601 

Hughes V. Blake (1818), 1 Mason, 515 U40 

Hughes V. Buokland (1846), 16 M. & W. 346 ; 3 Dowl. & L. 702 ; 16 h. J. 

Ex. 233; 10 Jur. 884 31, 39, 227 

Hughes V. Budd (1840), 8 Dowl. 315 ; 4 Jur. 150 312, 314 

Hughes V. Metrop. Ry. Co. (1877), 46 L. J. C. P. 578 ; 46 L. J. C. P. 583 ; 

2 App. Cas. 439 ; 36 L. T. 932 ; 25 W. E. 680 544 

Hughes V. Morris (1852), 21 L. J. Ch. 761 ; 2 De G. M. & G. 349 ; 16 Jur. 

603 661 

Hughes V. Paramore (1855), 24 L. J. Ch. 681 ; 7 De G. M. & G. 229 ; 1 

Jur. N. S. 1101 710, 715 

Hughes V. Rogers (1841), 8 M. & W. 125 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 238 1226 

Hughes V. Vargas (1893), 9 R. 661 ; 9 T. L. E. 92 618, 619 

Huguenin v. Baaeley (1807), 14 Ves. 273 ; 9 R. R. 148, 276 ; Preface vi. . 136 

Hulbert v. Hulbert (1891), 26 Amer. St. E. 482 592 

Hull V. Blake (1816), 13 Mass. 163 1139 

Hull, Mayor of, w. Homer (1779), 1 Cowp. 102 122, 123 

Humble v. Hunt (1817), Holt, N. P. E. 601 1050 

Humble v. Hunter (1848), 12 Q. B. 310 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 350 ; 12 Jur. 

121 759 

Humble v. MitcheU (1839), 11 A. & E. 205 ; 2 Railw. Cas. 70 6«3, 684 

Hume V. Burton (1785), 1 Eidg. P. C. (Ir.) 204 1102 

Hume V. Scott (1821), 3 A. K. Marsh. 261 973 

Humphrey v. St. Leger (1841), Ir. Cir. E. 714 314 

Humphreys v. Budd (1841), 9 Dowl. 1000 ; 6 Jur. 630 17 

Humphreys v. Green (1882), 10 Q. B. D. 148 ; 52 L. J. Q. B. 140 ; 48 

L. T. 60 ; 47 J. P. 244 688 

Humphreys v. Jones (1846), 14 M. & W. 1 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 254 712 

Humphries v. Brogden (1848), 12 Q. B. 739, 746 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 10 ; 16 

Jur. 124 114, 115 

Hungate v. Gascoyne (1846), 2 PhOl. 26 ; 2 Coop. 414 422, 423, 424 

Hungerford v. Beecher (1866), 6 Ir. Ch. Rep. 417 93 

Hunt V. Adams (1809), 5 Mass. 360 668, 744, 757, 768 

Hunt«. Adams (1811), 7 Mass. 518 768, 1196 

Hunt V. Anderson (1868), L. R. 1 P. & D. 476 ; 37 L. J. P. & M. 27 . . . . 1189 

Hunt V. Goodlake (1873), 43 L. J. C. P. 64 ; 29 L. T. 472 46 

Hunt V. Hecht (1853), 8 Ex. 814 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 293 692 

Hunt V. Hewitt (1852), 7 Ex. 243 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 210 ; 16 Jur. 603 . .1184, 1185 

Hunt V. Hort (1791), 3 Bro. C. C. 311 760 

Hunt V. Hunt (1866), L. R. 1 P. & D. 209 ; 35 L. J. P. & M. 135 699 

Hunt i>. Livermore (1827), 5 Pick. 395 756 

Hunt V. Massey (1834), 2 B. & Ad. 502 ; 3 N. & M. 109 146 

Hunt V. Peake (1860), Johns. 706 ; 29 L. J. Ch. 786 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 107 . . 115 

Hunt V. Rousmanier (1823), 8 Wheat. 211 748 

Hunt (should be Hart) v. Tulk (1862), 2 De G. M. & G. 300 ; 22 L. J. Ch. 

649 802 

Hunt 4). Wimbledon Local Board (1878), 3 C. P. D. 208 ; 47 L. J. C. P. 

640 650 

Hunt V. Wise (1869), 1 F. & F. 445 476 

Hunter, The (1815), 1 Dods. Adm. 480, 486, 487 102, 108 

Hunter v. Atkins (1832), 3 Myl. & K. 113 137 

Hunter v. Caldwell (1847), 10 Q. B. 69 ; 12 Jur. 285 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 274. . 39 

Hunter v. Emmanuel (1854), 16 C. B. 290 ; 24 L. J. C. P. 16 190 

Hunter v. Leathley (1830), 10 B. & C. 858 321 

Hunter v. Neck (1841), 3 M. & Gr. 181 ; 3 Scott, N. R. 448 ; 10 L. J. 

C. P. 297 19 



Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CIV TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAOa 

Hunter v. Parker (1840), 7 M. & W. 343 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 281 . . . .643, 646, 651, 

652, 730 
Hunter v. Stewart (1861), 31 L. J. Ch. 346 ; 4 De a. P. & J. 168. . . .1117, 1123 

Hunter v. Walters (1870), L. E. 11 Eq. 292 ; 24 L. T. 276 542 

Huntingdon Peerage (1818), Report by Bell, 357 ; Att.-Gen.'s Report, 

357 423, 426 

Huntingford v. Massey (1869), 1 F. & E. 690 243 

Huntley v. Donovan (1850), 15 Q. B. 96 1047 

Huntley Peerage (1818), Pari. Min. 15 423 

Hurd V. Moring (1824), 1 C. & P. 372 609 

Hurpurshad v. Sheo-Dyal (1870), L. R. 3 Ind. App. 259, 286 899 

Hurst's case (1804), 4 ball. 387 866 

Hurst «i. Beach (1821), 5 Madd. 351 805, 808 

Hussey v. Crickett (1811), 3 Camp. 168 621 

Hussey «>. Home-Payne (1878), 4 App. Cas. 311 ; 48 L. J. Ch. 846; 47 

L. J. Ch. 751 ; 8 Ch. D. 670 672 

Hutoheon v. Mannington (1802), 6 Ves. 823 9 

Hutohins V. Denziloe (1792), 1 Hagg. Cons. R. 181 632 

Hutchinat). Soott(1837),2M.&W.816; M.&H. 194; 6L.J.Ex. 186. .801, 1197, 

1199 

Hutchinson v. Bernard (1836), 2 M. & Roh. 1 355 

Hutchinson v. Glover (1875), 45 L. J. Q. B. 120 ; 1 Q. B. D. 138 ; 33 

L. T. 605 ; 24 "W. R. 185 1187 

Hutchinson v. Tatham (1873), 42 L. J. 0. P. 260 ; L. R. 8 C. P. 482 . .764, 769 

Hutchison v. Bowker (1839), 5 M. & W. 635 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 24 43 

Huthwaite v. Phaire (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 159 ; 1 Soott, N. R. 43 ; 8 Dowl. 

541 1133 

Hutt, Ex parte (1839), 7 Dowl. 690; 3 Jur. 1105 994, 998 

Hutt V. Morrell (1849), 3 Ex. 241 532 

Huttou, Be (1837), 1 Curt. 595 173 

Hutton V. Bright (1851-7), 3 H. L. Cas. 341 ; 16 Jur. 696 540, 641 

Huttou V. Rossiter (1854-6), 7 De G. M. & G. 9; 24L. J. Ch. 106 539, 553 

Hutton V. ITpflll (1850), 2 H. L. Cas. 674 ; 14 Jur. 843 540 

Hutton V. "Ward (I860), 15 Q. B. 26 : 19 L. J. Q. B. 293 ; 14 Jur. 372 318 

Hutton V. Warren (1836), 1 M. & W. 466 ; 2 Gale, 71 ; 1 T. & G. 646 ; 

5 L. J. Ex. 234 169, 768, 770, 781, 783 

Hux, Re (1877), 46 L. J. P. D. & A. 39 ; 35 L. T. 909 ; 25 W. R. 273 . . 1214 
Huxley v. East London Ry. Co. (1889), 14 App. Cas. 26 ; 58 L. J. Q. B. 

305 ; 60 L. T. 642 ; 37 W. R. 626 41 

Hyckraan v. Shotbolt (1567), 3 Dyer, 279 b 543 

Hyde v. Hyde (1889), 69 L. T. 623 914 

Hyde v. Palmer (1862), 3 B. & S. 667 ; 32 L. J. Q. B. 126 ; 11 W. R. 

433 380 

Hydev. Watts (1843), 12 51. &W. 254; IDowl. &L. 479; 13 L.J. Ex.41 522 

Hyman v. Nye (1881), 6 Q. B. D. 685 ; 44 L. T. 919 ; 46 J. P. 554 772 

Hynde's case (1592-3), 4 Rep. 71 b : cited in Doe ». Wright, 10 A. & E. 

775 1140 

Ibbott v. Bell (1866), 34 Beav. 396 708 

Illingworth v. Leigh (1800), 4 GwiUim, 1615 ; 3 Eag. & T. 1385 511 

Ilott*. Genge (1846), 3 Curt. 174 696, 697 

Imperial Bank v. Lend. & St. Catherine Dock Co. (1876), 46 L.J. Ch. 337; 

5 Ch. D. 195; 36L. T. 233 6, 769 

Imperial Gas Co. v. Clarke (1830), 7 Bing. 95 ; 4 M. & P. 727 995 

Imperial Loan Co. v. Stone, (1892) 1 Q. B. 599 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 449 ; 

66 L T. 556 ; 56 J. P. 436 242 

Imrie v. Castrique (1860), 8 C. B. N. S. 405 1103 

Inca, The (1858), 12 Moore, P. C. C. 189 ; Swab. 370 177 

Incledon v. Berry (1806), 1 Camp. 203, n. («) 1096 

Indian Zoedone Co., Re (1884), 53 L. J. Ch. 468 ; 26 Ch. D. 70 1022 

InajaUs v. Bills (1816), 9 Mete. 1 772 

Ingilby v. Shafto (1863), 32 L. J. Ch. 807 ; 33 Beav. 31 USS 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CV 

PAGE 

Inglesant v. Inglesant (1874), L. K. 3 P. & D. 172 ; 43 L. J. P. & M. 43. . 69t5 

IngUs V. Buttery (1878), 3 App. Cas. 552 743 

Inglis V. Great North. Ey. Go. (1852), 1 Maoq. 112; 1 Paterson, 78.. 294; 1176, 1177 

Inglia V. Inglis and Allen (1867), 16 L. T. 775 ; 15 W. R. 1093 621 

IngUsj!. Spenoe (1834), 1 0. M. &R. 436; 4L.J.Ex.ll; 3 Tyr. 8. . ..518, 619 

Ingraliam v. Bookius (1823), 9 Serg. & R. 285 458 

Ingram v. Lea (1810), 2 Camp. 621 289 

Ingram v. "Wyatt (1828), 1 Hagg. Eoo. 384 140 

Inman v. Foster (1832), 8 Wend. 602 255 

Inman v. Stamp (1815), 1 Stark. 12 ; 18 R. E. 740 . . . .' 682 

Innell v. Newman (1821), 4 B. & Aid. 419 ." 487 

Innia v. Campbell (1829), 1 Rawle, 373 172 

Interleaf Publishing Co. v. Phillips (1885), C. & B. 315 281 

International Ey. Co. v. Anderson (1891), 27 Amer. St. E. 907 377 

lona. The (1867), L. E. 1 P. C. 426 ; 4 Moo. P. C. 0. N. S. b36 ; 16 L. T. 

158 178 

Ipswich case (1835), Knapp & Ombler, 387 497 

Ipswich Dock Commiss. v. St. Peter, Ipswich (1867), 7 B. & S. 310 112 

Ireland*. PoweU (1802), cited Pea. Ev. 16 396, 400 

Irish Society v. Bp. of Derry (1846), 12 CI. & Pin. 665 1102, 1230 

Irons V. Smallpiece (1819), 2 B. & Aid. 551 639 

Irving V. Greenwood (1824), 1 0. & P. 350 255 

Irving V. Veitoh (1837), 3 M. & W. 90 ; Mur. & H. 313 ; 7 L. J. Ex. 25 . . 717 

Irwin V. Callwell (I860), 12 Ir. C. L. R. 144 1163 

Isaacs. Farrer (1836). IM.&W. 70; 4Dowl.765; 5L. J.Ex.94; 1T.&G.281 220 

Isaac V. Gompertz (1837), cited Hubback on Ev. of Suoo. 650 418 

Isaacs V. Hardy (1884), C. & E. 287 ' Add. [688] 

Isabella, The (1799), 2 C. Eob. Adm. 241 757 

Isquierdo v. Forbes (1750-61), cited 1 Doug. 6 1165 

Israel v. Argent (1834), Pears. Chit. PI. 330, n. (i) 147 

Israel ». Clark (103, should be 1803), 4 Esp. 259 650 

Issard v. Lambert, In re Davies (1890), 44 Ch. D. 263 ; 59 L. J. Ch. 516 ; 

62 L. T. 716 ; 38 W. R. 534 913 

Ivat V. Finch (1808), 1 Taun. 141 ; 9 R. E. 716 612 

Ivey V. Young (1836), 1 M. & Rob. 545 192 

Ivy, Lady, and Neal's case (1684), cited Skin. 623; 1 Salk. 281 ; 12 Mod. 86 1179 

Jack v. Kiernan (1840), 2 Jebb & Sy. 231 1016, 1017, 1044 

Jackson, Re, Ex parte Bk. of Manchester (1871), 40 L. J. Bk. 57 ; L. R. 

12Eq. 354; 19 W. R. 872; 24L. T. 961 685 

Jackson, Re, In re "Walker (1886), 63 L. T. 660 ; 34 W. R. 95 621 

Jackson v. Adams (1835), 2 Scott, 599 ; 2 Bing. N. C. 402 ; 1 Hodges, 339 244 
Jackson v. Allaway (1844), 6 M. & Gr. 942 ; 7 Scott, N. R. 875 ; 13 L. J. 

C. P. 84 ; 8 Jur. 63 201 

Jackson v. Allen (1822), 3 Stark. R-. 74 1191 

Jackson v. Bailey (1806), 2 Johns. 17 364 

Jackson V. Bard (1809), 4 Johns. 230 443, 610 

Jackson v. Blanshan (1808), 3 Johns. 292 86, 433 

Jackson v. Browner (1820), 18 Johns. 37 413 

Jackson v. Bumham (1852), 8 Ex. 173 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 13 664 

Jackson v. Christman (1830), 4 Wend. 277 927 

Jackson v. Cooley (1811), 8 Johns. 128 422 

Jackson v. French (1829), 3 Wend. 337 698, 599 

Jackson v. Frier (1819), 16 Johns. 196 306 

Jackson v. Gridley (1820), 18 Johns. 98 898 

Jackson v. Hesketh (1819), 2 Stark. R. 618 270 

Jackson v. Hill (1839), 10 A. & E. 477 ; 2 P. & D. 466 ; 3 Jur. 976 649 

Jackson v. Irvin (1809), 2 Camp. 60 ; 11 R, E. 658 169 

Jackson v. Jackson (1825), 5 Cowen, 173 909 

Jackson v. Jackson (1842), Ir. Cir. R. 469 1162 

Jackson -o. KniflEen (1806), 2 Johns. 31 466, 470 

Jack-son v. Lamb (1827), 7 Cowen, 431 433 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CVl TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOB 

Jackson v. Ijowe (1822), 1 Bing. 9 ; 7 Moore, 219 672 

Jackson v. Luquere (1825), 5 Cowen, 221 , 433 

Jackson v. M'Call (1813), 10 Johns. 377 124, 433 

Jackson v. Malin (1818), 15 Johns. 297 1199 

Jackson v. Marsh (1826), 6 Cowen, 281 802 

Jackson v. Matsdorf (1814), 11 Johns. 97 90 

Jackson v. Metropolitan Ry. Co. (1877), 3 App. Gas. 193 ; 47 L. J. C. P. 

303 ; 37 L. T. 679 ; 26 W. R. 175 23, 28, 38 

Jackson v. Miller (1827), 6 Cowen, 751 11/8 

Jackson ». Oglander (1865), 2 H. &M. 465; 13L. T. 16; 13W. R. 936.. 672 

Jackson v. Pesked (1813), 1 M. & Sel. 237 ; 14 R. R. 417 85 

Jackson v. Seagar (1«44), 2 Dowl. & L. 13 815, 832 

Jackson v. Thomaeon (1862), 31 li. J. Q. B. 11 ; 1 B. & S. 745 ; 8 Jur. 

N. S. 134 ; 6 L. T. 104 ; 10 W. R. 42 939 

Jackson v. Waldron (1834), 12 Wend. 178-197 1219 

Jackson v. 'Williamson (1788), 2 T. R. 281 816 

Jaofoon V. "Winchester (1800), 4 Ball. 206 .' 327 

Jackson v. Wood (1829), 3 Wend. 27 1098 

Jackson v. WooUey (1858), 27 L. J. Q. B. 181 ; 8 E. & B. 778 ; 4 Jur. 

N. S. 656 490 

Jackson v. Wright (1817), 11 Johns. 193 90 

Jacob V. Hungate (1834), 1 M. & Rob. 445 261, 816, 832 

Jacob «>. Lee (1837), 2 M. & Rob. 33 313 

Jacob V. Lindsay (1801), 1 East, 460 293, 485, 926 

Jacobs, Re (1836), 1 Har. & W. 123 833 

Jacobs V. Hart (1817), 6 M. & Sel. 142 ; 2 Stark. R. 45 1195, 1196 

Jacobs V. Humphrey (1834), 2 C. & M. 413 ; 4 Tyr. 272; 3 L. J. Ex. 82. . 496 

Jacobs V. Jacobs (1834), 3 Dowl. 677 870 

Jacobs V. Layborn (1843), 11 M. & W. 685 ; 1 Dowl. & L. 352 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 

427 ; 7 Jur. 562 909, 910 

Jacobs V. Seward (1872), L. R. 6 H. L. 464 ; 41 L. J. C. P. 221 ; 27 L. T. 

185 192 

Jacobs V. Tarleton (1848), 11 Q. B. 421 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 194 ; 12 Jur. 517 272 

Jacomb v. Turner, (1892) 1 Q. B. 47 1040 

Jaggers v. Binnings (1815), 1 Stark. R. 64 ; 19 R. R. 746 492 

Jakeman v. Cook (1879), 48 L. J. Ex. 165 ; 4 Ex. D. 26 ; 27 W. R. 171. . 1157 

James v. Biou (1826), 2 Sim. & St. 606 520, 621 

James v. Cohen (1844), 3 Curt. 782 709 

James v. Hatfield (1734), 1 Str. 648 488 

James v. Salter (1837), 3 Bing. N. C. 544 74 

James v. Smith (1890), 63 L. T. 524 665 

James v. Williams (1834), 5 B. & Ad. 1109 ; 3 N. & M. 196 ; 2 Dowl. 481 669 

Jameson v. Drinkald (1826), 12 Moore (C. P. ), 148 935 

Jameson v. Leitch (1842), Milw. 688 1031, 1116 

Jameson v. Stein (1855), 21 Beav. 6 ; 26 L. J. Ch. 41 679 

Jameson v. Swintou (1810), 2 Taun. 224 ; 2 Camp. 373 33 

Janaway, Re (1875), 44 L. J. P. & M. 6 ; 31 L. T. 800 ; 23 W. R. 385 . . 697 

J' Anson V. Stuart (1796), 1 T. R. 754 ; 1 R. R. 392 249 

Jardine i). Sheridan (1846), 2 C. & K. 24 606, 514 

' Jarmain v. Hooper (1843), 6 M. & Gr. 827 ; 1 Dowl. & L. 769 ; 13 L. J. 

C. P. 63 ; 8 Jur. 127 168 

Jarrett v. Leonard (1814), 2 M. & Sel. 265 498 

Jayne i>. Price (1814), 5 Taun. 326 ; 1 Marsh. 68 ; 15 R. R. 618 116 

Jeakes v. White (1861), 6 Ex. 873 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 265 682 

Jeans v. Cooke (1857), 24 Beav. 613 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 57 ; 27 L. J. Ch. 202. . 666 

Jeans v. Wheedon (1843), 2 M. & Rob. 486 294, 366 

Jeffoott «>. North Brit. Oil Co. (1873), I. R. 8 C. L. 17 671 

Jefeerson Ins. Co. v. Cotheal (1831), 7 Wend. 72 934 

Jeffery v. Walton (1816), 1 Stark. R. 267 745 

Jefferys v. Boosey (1884), 4 H. L. Cas. 815 ; 3 0. L. R. 625 ; 24 L. J. Ex. 

81 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 615 731 

Jeffries v. Great Western Ry. Co. (1856), 5 El. & Bl. 802 ; 25 L. J. Q. B. 

107 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 230 117 



The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CVH 

PAQE 

JefPries v. Wmiams (1850), S Ex. 792 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 14 114, 115 

Jenkins v. Betham (1854), 15 C. B. 188 ; 3 C. L. R. 373 ; 24 L. J. 0. P. 

94 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 237 780 

Jenkins v. Blizard (1816), 1 Stark. R. 419 ; 19 R. R. 792 1096 

Jenkins v. Bushby (1866), 35 L. J. Ch. 400, 820 ; L. R. 2 Eq. 547 ; 14 W. R. 

631 ; 34 L. T. 431 692, 699, 1183 

Jenkins v. Bushby, (1891) 1 Ch. 484 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 254 ; 64 L. T. 213 ; 39 

W. R. 321 23 

Jenkins f. Davies (1876), 1 Ch. D. 696 ; 24 W. R. 690 534 

Jenkins v. Gaisford (1883), 37 L. J. P. & M. 122 ; 3 S. & T. 93 700 

Jenkins v. Harvey (1835), 1 C. M. & E. 877 ; 2 C. M. & R. 393 ; 1 Gale, 

23 ; 6 Tyr. 326 792 

Jenkins v. Heycock (1853), 8 Moo. P. C. 0. 351 ; 1 C. L. R. 406 ; 5 Moo. 

Ind. App. 361 771 

Jenkins v. Morris (1847), 16 M. & W. 877, 880 160 

Jenkins v. Phillips (1841), 9 C. & P. 766 ; 5 Jur. 252 189, 194 

Jenkins v. Reynolds (1821), 3 B. & B. 21 ; 6 Moore (C. P.), 86 668 

Jenner v. Ffinoh (1879), 49 L. J. P. & M. 25 ; 5 P. DIt. 106 ; 42 L. T. 327 ; 

28W. R. 620 704 

Jenner v. JolifEe (1810), 6 Johns. 9 293 

Jenner v. Morris (1861), 30 L. J. Ch. 361 ; 2 De G. F. & J. 45 ; 7 Jur. N. S.- 

376 ; 3 L. T. 871 ; 9 W. R. 391 167 

Jennings, Re (1851), 1 Ir. Ch. E. 236 1177 

Jennings v. Johnson (1873), L. R. 8 C. P. 425 724 

Jennings v. Whittaker (1826), 4 T. B. Monroe, 50 529 

Jessel V. Bath (1867), 36 L. J. Ex. 149 ; L. E. 2 Ex. 267 ; 15 W. R. 1041 . .85, 

741 

Jesus Coll. V. Gibhs (1834), 1 T. & 0. Ex. 156 ; 4 L. J. Ex. Eq. 42 320 

Jetley v. HiU (1884), C. & E. 239 166 

Jewell V. Christie (1867), 36 L. J. C. P. 168 ; L. R. 2 C. P. 296 ; 15 L. T. 

680 85 

Jewell V. Jewell (1843), 1 Howard, Sup. Ct. R. 231 413 

Jewett V. Torry (18 14), 11 Mass. 219 544 

Jewis V. Lawrence (1869), L. R. 8 Eq. 345 144 

Jewisou V. Dyson (1842), 9 M. & W. 540 ; 2 M. & R. 377 ; 11 L. J. Ex. 

401 232 

Jewitt, Re (1864), 33 L. J. Ch. 730 ; 33 Beav. 559 869 

Jewitt V. Eokhardt (1878), 8 Ch. D. 404 ; 26 W. R. 415 651 

Jewshury v. Newhold (1867), 26 L. J. Ex. 247 166 

Jeyes v. Booth (1797), 1 Bos. & P. 97 ; 4 E. R. 771 732 

Jinks «). Edwards (1866), 11 Ex. 776 773 

Joel V. Dicker (1847), 6 Dowl. & L. 1 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 359 732, 733 

John and Mary, The (1859), Swab. Adm. E. 471 1120 

John V. Bacon (1870), L. E. 5 C. P. 437 ; 39 L. J. C. P. 355 772 

Johnson, Ex parte, Re Chapman (1884), 26 Ch. D. 338 ; 53 L. J. Ch. 763 ; 

32 W. R. 693 915 

Johnson v. Appleby (1874), 43 L. J. C. P. 146 ; L. R. 9 C. P. 158 743 

Johnson v. Baker (1821), 4 B. & Aid. 440 1203 

Johnson v. Ball (1851), 5 De G. & Sm. 85 ; 21 L. J. Ch. 210 701 

Johnson v. Barnes (1873), L. R. 8 C. P. 527 ; 42 L. J. C. P. 259 ; 29 L. T. 

66 122 

Johnson v. Blane (1848), 6 Notes of Cas. (Eoc. & Mar.) 457, 461 170 

Johnson i). Caulkins (1799), 1 Johns. 116 255 

Johnson v. Credit Lyonnais Co. (1877), 3 C. P. D. 32 ; 47 L. J. C. P. 241 ; 

37 L. T. 657 ; 26 W. E. 195 116 

Johnson v. Daveme (1821), 19 Johns. 134 609, 1221 

Johnson v. Dodgson (1837), 2 M. & "W. 659 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 185 674 

Johnson t). Duke of Marlborough (1818), 2 Stark. R. 378 1193 

Johnson v. Durant (1831), 4 C. & P. 327 ; 2 B. & Ad. 925 612, 1160 

Johnson v. Hooker (1789), 1 Dall. 406 1178 

Johnson v. Holdsworth (1835), 4 Dowl. 63 487 

Johnson v. Johnson (1832), 2 L. J. Ex. 73 ; 1 C. & M. 140 ; 3 Tyr. 

73 696 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CVm TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAQB 

Johnson v. Kershaw (1847), 1 De G. & Sm. 260 ; 11 Jur. 553, 795 323 

Johnson v. Lawson (1824), 2 Bing. 86 ; 9 Moore, 183 413, 415 

Johnson v. Lindsay (1889), 23 Q. B. D. 608 ; 68 L. J. Q. B. 581 ; 38 

W. E. 119 492 

Johnson v. Lyford (1868), 37 L. J. P. & M. 65 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 646. .143, 356, 

747 

Johnson v. Manning (1860), 12 Ir. C. L. R. 148 167 

Johnson v. Mason (1794), 1 Esp. 89 1208 

Johnson v. Raylton (1881), 7 Q. B. D. 438 ; 50 L. J. Q. B. 753 777 

Johnsgn v. Reid (1840), 6 M. & W. 124 ; 9 L. J. M. 0. 25 132 

Johnson f. St. Peter, Hereford (1846), 4 A. & E. 525 ; 4 N. & M. 186 ; 

1 H. & W. 720 169 

Johnson v. Stear (1863), 15 C. B. N. S. 330 781 

Johnson v. Ward (1806), 6 Esp. 47 500, 1050 

Johnson v. Warwick (1856), 25 L. J. C. P. 102 ; 17 C. B. 516 92 

Johnston v. Clinton (1841), Arm. M. & 0. 123 977 

Johnston v. Mappin, (1891) 60 L. J. Ch. 241 ; 64 L. T. 48 679 

Johnston v. Summer (1858), 3 H. & N. 261 ; 27 L. J. Ex. 341 ; 4 Jur. 

N. S. 462 166, 167 

Johnston v. Ushorne (1840), 11 A. & E. 549 ; 3 P. & D. 236 764, 783 

Johnstone v. Hudlestone (1826), 4 B. & C. 932 ; 7 D. & R. 411 16, 660 

Johnstone «. Sutton (1786), 1 T. R. 546; 1 R. R. 257, 269 110 

Joint V. Mortyn (1823), 2 Fox & Sm. 4 669 

JoUey u. Taylor (1807), 1 Camp. 143 289, 318 

Jolly V. Rees (1864), 33 L. J. C. P. 177 ; 15 C. B. N. S. 628 166 

Jolly V. Young (1800), 1 Esp. 186 763 

Joly «;. Swift (1847), 11 Ir. Eq. E. 410 1110, 1138 

Jones, In re (1855), Deaue, Eeo. R. 3 696 

Jones, In re (1864), 46- L. J. P. D. & A. 80 699 

Jones, Re, Ex parte Jones (1881), 18 Ch. D. 109 ; 29 W. R. 747 ; 50 L. J. 

Ch. 673 100 

Jones and Beaver's case (1665), Kelynge, 52 1126 

Jones V. Boland (1840), 2 Jebb & Sy. 289 47 

Jones V. Boyce (1816), 1 Stark. 493 163 

Jones «. Brewer (1811), 4 Taun. 47 329, 1209 

Jones V. Carringtou (1824), 1 C. & P. 329 511 

Jones V. Cowley (1825), 4 B. & C. 445 185 

Jones V. Curling (1884), 13 Q. B. ». 262 ; 53 L. J. Q. B. 373 ; 50 L. T. 

349 ; 32 W. R. 651 41 

Jones V. Cwmorlhen Slate Co. (1879), 5 Ex. Div. 93 ; 49 L. J. Ex. 110 ; 

41 L. T. 575 ; 28 W. R. 237 ; 44 J. P. 168 50 

Jones V. Edwards (1823), M'Cl. & Y. 139 313 

Jones V. Elint (1839), 10 A. & E. 758 ; 9 L. J. Q. B. 252 ; 2 P. & D. 

594 685, 686 

Jones !>. Fort (1828), M. & M. 196 ' 26 

Jones V. Foxall (1852), 15 Beav. 388 ; 21 L. J. Ch. 725 514 

Jones V. Frost, In re Fiddey (187*), L. R. 7 Ch. App. 773 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 

47; 27 L. T. 465; 20 W. R. 1025 93 

Jones V. Gale's Exors. (1817), 4 Mart. 635 14 

Jones V. Galway Town Commissioners (1847), Ir. L. E. 435 134 

Jones V. Gooday (1842), 9 M. & W. 743 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 914 226, 227 

Jones V. Goodrich (1844), 5 Moo. P. C. 0. 16 610 1045 

Jones V. Harris (1871), 41 L. J. Q. B. 6 ; L. E. 7 Q. B. 197 736 

Jones V. Hoey (1880), 128 Mass. 585 782 

Jones f. Howell (1835), 4 Dowl. 176 286 

Jones V. Hutchinson (1851), 10 C. B. 516 ; 20 L. J. C.P. 114 193 

Jones V. Jones (1786), 1 Cox, Ch. 184 3^9 

Jones V. Jones (1841), 9 M. & W. 76 ; 11 L J. Ex. 265 " 1216 

Jones V. Just (1868), 37 L. J. Q. B. 89; L. E. 3 Q. B. 197 ; 9 B. & S 141 777 

Jones V. Littledale (1837), 6 A. & E. 486 ; 1 N. & P. 977 768 

Jones 0. Milla (1861?), 10 C. B. N. S. 788 ; 31 L. J. C. P. 66 : 8 Jur N S 

387 36 

Jones V. Morrell ^844), 1 C. & K. 266 628 

TAe references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OP CARES CITED. CIX 

PAQB 

Jones V. Newman (1750-1), 1 "W. Bl. 60 793 

Jones J). Ogle (1&73), 41 L. J. Ch. 633; 42 L. J. Ch, 334; L. R. 14 Eq. 

419 ; L. R. 8 Oh. 192 ; 20 W. R. 794 : 21 W. R. 239 ; 27 L. T. 367 ; 

28L. T. 245 139 

Jones 4). Pepperoorne (1859), 28 L. J. Ch. 158 ; Johns. 430 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 

140 5 

Jones V. Perry (1796), 2 Esp. 482 373 

Jones V. Pugh (1842), 1 Phill. 91 593 

Jones V. Randall (1774), 1 Cowp. 17 ; Lofft, 383, 428 1032, 1036, 1093 

Jones V. Ryder (1838), 4 M. & W. 32 ; 1 H. & H. 256 387, 716 

Jones «). Stevens (1822), 11 Price, 235 252, 255 

Jones V. Stroud.(1825), 2 0. & P. 196 ■ 923, 924 

Jones V. Tarleton (1842), 9 M. & W. 676 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 625 ; 6 Jur. 

348 309 

Jones ». Turberville (1792), 2 Ves. jun. 11 495 

Jones V. Tumour (1830), 4 0. & P. 204 647 

Jones V. Turpin (1871), 6 Heisk. (Tenn.) 181 616 

Jones V. Victoria Graving Dock Co. (1877), 46 L. J. Q. B. 219 ; 2 Q. B. 

D. 314 ; 36 L. T. 144 ; 26 W. R. 348 672, -674 

Jones V. Waller (1753), 3 GwilUm, 847 171, 431 

Jones «). -Walters (1835),. 4 L. J. Ex. 109; 1 C. M. & R. 713; 5 Tyr. 

361 1203, 1204 

JonesD. White (1717), 1 Str. 68 ; Bull. N. P. 233 1102, 1116 

Jones i-.WiUiams (1837), 2 M. & W. 327 233 

Jouiaux, Madame, case of, " Times," 8 Jan., 4 Feb. 1895 673 

Jopp V. Wood (1865), 4 De O. J. & S. 616 ; 34 L. J. Ch. 211 ; 11 Jur. 

N. S. 212 ; 12 L. T. 41 ; 13 W. R. 481 179 

Jordaine v. Lashbrooke (1798), 7 T. R. 601 877 

Jordan v. Lewis (1739), 14 East, 305, n. ; 12 R. R. 520, n 600, 987 

Jorden v. Money (1854), 6 H. L. Gas. 185 ; 23 L. J. Ch. 865 539, 627 

Jory V. Orchard (1779), 2 Bos. & P. 39 ; 5 R. R. 537 317 

Josling V. Kingsford (1863), 32 L. J. 0. P. 94 ; 13 C. B. N. S. 447 ; 11 

W. R. 377 776 

Joumu V. Bourdieu (1787), Park on Insurance, 245 763 

Judd «>. Green (1876), 46 L. J. Oh. 108 ; 33L. T. 597 i37 

Judge V. Berkeley (1826), cited 7 0. & P. 371, n. (a) 246 

Jugsomohun Ghose v. Manickchund (1859), 7 Moo. Ind. App. Cas. 263 . . 782 

Justice «). Elstob (1858), 1 P. & F. 256 290, 312, 1055 

Justice V. Gosling (1852), 12 C. B. 39 ; 21 L. J. C. P. 94 ; 16 Jur. 429 . . 1116 
Justice V. Mersey Steel Co. (1875), 24 W. R. 199 1234 

Kadish v. Garden City, &o., (1894) 42 Am. St. R. 256 Add. [644] 

Kahl V. Jansen (1812), i Taun. 565 388, 486 

Kain v. Old (1824), 2 B. & 0. 634 747 

Kaines v. Knightly (1682), Skin. 54 756 

Karla, The (1864), B. & Lush. Adm. 367 ; 13 W. R. 295 818 

Kavanagh v. Cuthbert (1874-5), I. R. 9 0. L. 136 779 

Kay V. Brookman (1828), 3 0. & P. 556 328, 1216 

Kay V. Crook (1857), 3 Sm. & G. 407 679 

Kay V. Duohesse de Pienne (1811), 3 Camp. 123 373 

Keable v. Payne (1838), 8 A. & E. 660; 7 L. J. Q. B. 218 ; 3 N. &P. 531. .1102, 

1116 

Kealy v. Tenant (1861), 13 Ir. L. R. 394 690 

Keane v. Smallbone (1855), 17 0. B. 179 ; 25 L. J. C. P. 72 1195 

Kearney v. Great Southern and Western Ry. Co. (1886), 18 L. R. Ir. 303. . 163 

Kearney v. King (1819), 2 B. & Aid. 301 16, 18 

Kearney v. Lond. and Brigh. Ry. Co. (1871), L. R. 5 Q. B. 411 ; 39 L. J. 

Q. B. 200 ; 22 L. T. 886 ; 18 W. R 1000 ; L. R. 6 Q. B. 769 ; 40 L. J. 

Q. B. 285 ; 24 L. T. 913 ; 20 W. R. 24 163 

Keating v. Boultou (1887), 22 L. R. Ir. 143 624 

Keeeh v. Sandford (1776), 1 White & T., L. C. 53 ; Select Cas. in Chan. 61 665 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



ex TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOE 

Keeling*). Ball (1796), Peake, Add. Cas. 88 1214 

Keen ». Batshore (1794), 1 Esp. 194 1161 

Keen v. Keen (1873), 42 L. J. P. & M. 61 ; L. R. 3 P. & D. 105 143 

Keenf. Priest (1858), 1 F. & F. 314 526 

Keene v. Biscoe (1878), 47 L. J. Ch. 644 ; 8 Ch. D. 201 ; 38 L. T. 286 ; 

26 "W. E,. 552 522 

Kehoe, Re (1884), 13 L. E. Ir. 13 701 

Keigwin v. Keigwin (1843), 3 Curt. 607 696 

Keenan v. Boylan (1803), 1 Soh. & Lef. 232 1014 

Keisfielbrack v. Livingstone (1819), 4 Johns. (Am.) 114 750 

Keith V. Burrows (1876), 1 0. P. D. 722 ; 45 L. J. C. P. 876 651 

Kell V. Charmer (1856), 23 Beav. 195 761, 786, 796 

Kell V. Nainby (1829), 10 B. & 0. 20 540 

KeUer, In goods of (1891), 61 L. J. P. 39 ; 65 L. T. 763 702 

Keller v. Blood (1861), 13 Ir. C. L. R. 19 2ii2 

Kellington, Vicar of, v. Trin. Coll. (1747), 1 Wils. 170 lOJO 

Kelly V. Bamewall (1834), Cooke & Ale. 94 870 

Kelly f. Jackson (1849), 13 Ir. Eq. R. 129 592, 605 

Kelly V. Keatinge (1871), I. R. 5 Eq. 174 697 

Kelly V. Lawrence (1864), 33 L. J. Ex. 197 ; 3 H. & C. 1 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 

637 ; 12 W. R. 413 543 

Kellyj). Mid. G. W. Ry. Co. (1872), I. R. 7C. L. 8 643 

Kelly V. Powlet (1763), Amb. 605 ; Dick. 559 789 

Kelly V. Small (1799), 2 Esp. 716 504 

Kelly J). Smith (1841), Arm. M. &0. 130 977 

Kelly *. Webster (1852), 12 C. B. 283 ; 21 L. J. C. P. 163 ; 16 Jur. 838 . . 682 
Kelsall V. Marshall (1856), 10 C. B. N. S. 266 ; 26 L. J. C. P. 19 ; 2 Jur. 

N. S. 1142 341, 1165 

Kelsev v. Bush (1842), 2 HiU, S. Car. R. 440 479 

Kelson V. Kelson (1853), 10 Hare, 385 ; 17 Jur. 129 ; 22 L. J. Ch. 745 . . 748 

Kemble v. Farren (1829), 3 C. & P. 623 488 

Kemp V. Derrett (1814), 3 Camp. 510 ; 14 R. R. 820 35 

Kemp 1). King (1842), 2 M. & Rob. 437 321 

Kempland v. Macauley (1791), Peake, R. 66 ; 4 T. R. 436 514 

Kempson v. Boyle (1865), 34 L. J. Ex. 191 ; 3 H. & C. 763 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 

832 299 

Kempstou i>. Butler (1861), 12 Ir. C. L. R. 516 115 

Kempton ». Cross (1735), Cas. temp. Hardw. 108 8, 1045, 1046 

Kendall v. Hamilton (1879), 4 App. Cas. 504 ; 48 L. J. C. P. 705 ; 41 L. T. 

418; 28"W. R. 97 1115 

Kendall v. Lond. & S. W. Ry. Co. (1872), L. R. 7 Ex. 373 ; 41 L. J. Ex. 

184 ; 26 L. T. 735 ; 20 W. R. 886 771 

Kenn'scase (1607), 7 Co. Rep. 42 1103 

Kennas. Nugent (1873), I. R. 7 C. L. 464 1119 

Kennedy v. Earl of Essex, (1891) 28 L. R. Ir. 586 544 

Kennedy v. Hilliard (1859), 10 Ir. L. R. N. S. 195 865 

Kennerly v. Nash (1816), 1 Stark. R. 452 1203 

Kennett ». Milbank (1831), 8 Bing. 38 ; 1 Moo. & So. 102 713 

Kensington, Ld., v. Bouverie (1869), 7 H. L. C. 557 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 105 ; 

29 L. J. Cb. 537 138 

Kensington v. Inglis (1807), 8 East, 273 ; 9 R. R. 438 303, 927 

Kent ». Courage & Co., (1891) 55 J. P. 264 ; 7 T. L. R. 50 643 

Kent V. Jackson (1851), 14 Bear. 384 ; 2 De G. M. & G. 49 ; 21 L. J. Ch. 

438 538 

Kent V. Riley (1872), L. R. 14 Eq. 190 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 569 ; 27 L. T. 263 ; 

20 "W. R. 852 135 

Kenworthy v. Schofield (1824), 2 B. & C. 947 ; 4 Dowl. & R. 556 668, 730 

Keogh 1>. Keogh (1874), I. R. 8 Eq. 179, 449 SOI 

Keogh V. Leonard (1877), I. R. 11 Eq. 366 912 

Kepp V. Wiggett (1851), 10 C. B. 63; 20 L. J. C. P. 49: 14 Jur. 1137 ..88, 94 

Keriu V. Davoren (1861), 12 Ir. Ch. B. 352 455 

Kemot V. Pittis (1853), 2 E. & B. 425 ; 23 L. J. Q. B. 33 ; 17 Jur. 932 . . 887 

Kerr v. Shedden (1831), 4 C. & P. 531, n. (a) 1048 

The references are to pages, not to paragrajihs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXI 

PAGE 

Kershaw ». Cox (1800), 3 Esp. 246 1196 

Kershaw v. Kershaw (1875), 119 Mass. 140 74'4 

Kershaw 0. Ogden (1865), 34 L. J. Ex. 1-59; 3 H. & C. 717; 11 Jur. 

N. S. 642 ; 12 L. T. 573 ; 13 W. E. 765 689, 690 

Kestrel, The (1881), 6 P. D. 182; 4 Asp. M. G. 433; 45 L. T. Ill ; 30 

W. E. 182 935 

Kettlewell v. Barstow (1872), 41 L. J. Oh. 718 ; L. E. 7 Oh. 686 ; 27 L. T. 

258 ; 20 W. E. 917 1184 

Kevans). Crawford (1876), 45 L. J. Oh. 668 1031 

Kevilj;. Lynch (1873), L E. 8 Eq. 244 693 

Key V. Ootesworth (1852), 7 Ex. 595 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 4 , 42 

Key V. Shaw (1832), 8 Bing. 320 ; 1 Moo. & So. 462 372, 524 

Keynes (should be Ryves) v. D. of Wellington (1846), 9 Beav. 579 ; 15 

L. J. Oh. 461 1045 

Keyse v. Powell (1853), 2 E. & B. 132 ; 22 L. J. Q. B. 305 ; 17 Jur. 1062. . 118 
Kibble, Ex parte, Re Onslow (1875), L. R. 10 Ch. 373 ; 44 L. J. Bank. 

63 ; 32 L. T. 138 ; 23 W. R. 433 718 

Kidderminster, Mayor of, v. Hardwioke (1873), 43 L. J. Ex. 9 ; L. E. 9 

Ex. 13 ; 29 L. T. 612 ; 22 "W. R. 160 631 

KidgiU i>. Moor (1860), 9 C. B. 364 ; 19 L. J. C. P. 177 : 14 Jur. 790 ; 1 

L. M. & P. 131 85 

Kidner v. Keith (1863), 15 0. B. N. S. 35 1204 

Kidney v. Cookbum (1831), 2 Russ. & Myl. 168 417, 423 

Kidstou V. Emp. Mar. Ins. Co. (1866), 35 L. J. C. P. 250 ; L. R. 1 C. P. 

535 ; 1 H. & E. 433 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 665 ; 15 L. T. 12 ; 15 W. R. 63 . . 764 

Kierau v. Sandars (1837), 6 A. & E. 515 ; 1 N. & P. 626 643 

Kilbee v. Sneyd () 828), 2 Moll. 193 627 

Kilgour V. Alexander (1860), 14 Moo. P. 0. C. 173 ; 4 L. T. 487 185 

Kilgour V. Finlyson (1789), 1 H. Bl. 156 386 

Killby V. Eochussen (1866), 18 C. B. N. S. 357 521 

Kilhek, Ee (1866), 3 S. & T. 578 ; 34 L. J. P. 2 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 1083 .... 695 
Kilpint). Ratley, (1802) 1 Q. B. 682; 66 L. T. 797 ; 40 W. R. 479; 66 

J. P. 565 639 

Kilvert's Trusts, Re (1871), L. R. 7 Ch. 170 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 351 ; L. R. 12 

Eq. 183; 26 L. T. 221; 20 W. R. 225 798 

Kimball v. Morrell (1826), 4 Greenl. 368 306 

Kimmel v. Kimmel (1817), 3 Serg. & E. 336 972, 973 

Kimpton, Ee (1864), 33 L. J. P. & M. 153 ; 3 S. & T. 427 699 

Kimpton v. Loud. & N. West. Ey. Co. (1854), 9 Ex. 766 ; 2 C. L. E. 1026 ; 

23 L. J. Ex. 232 868, 870 

Klndersley v. Chase (undated), 2 Park, Ins. 743 1149 

Kine v. Balfe (1813), 2 Ball & B. 347 679 

Kine v. Beaumont (1822), 3 B. & B. 291 ; 7 Moore, C. P. 112 316, 317 

Kine v. Evershed (1847), 10 Q. B. 143 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 271 ; 11 Jur. 673. . 226 

King's Coll. Hospital v. Wheildon (1864), 18 Beav. 30 ; 23 L. J. Ch. 5 i7. . 784 
King's County (should be Knox County) v. Neath National Bank (should 

be Ninth National Bank) (1893), 147 XT. S. 91 133 

King, Ex parte (1802), 7 Ves. 312 869 

King, In re, Unity Joint Stock, &c. Assn., Ex parte (1858), 3 De G-. & J. 

63 ; 27 L. J. Bank. 33 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 1257 641 

King V. Anderson (1874), 8 I. R. Eq. 147 136, 137 

King V. Bellord (1863), 1 H. & M. 343 ; 32 L. J. Ch. 646 ; 8 L. T. 633 ; 11 

W. R. 900 ; 2 N. R. 442 100 

King V. Chamberlain (1871), L. R. 6 C. P. 474 ; 40 L. J. C. P. 273 226 

King V. Clerk (1695), 1 Salk. 349 7 

King*'. Cole (1848), 2 Ex. 632 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 283 291 

King V. Eoxwell (1876), 3 Ch. D. 518 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 693 ; 24 W. E. 629 . . 179 

King V. Francis (1800), 3 Esp. 116 256 

King V. George, George's Estate, Re (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 670 ; 36 L. T. 

759 ; 5 Ch. D. 627 ; 25 W. R. 638 808 

King V. Hawkesworth (1879), 4 Q. B. D. 371 ; 48 L. J. Q. B. 484 ; 41 L. T. 

411 ; 27 W. R. 660 41 

King V. Hoare (1844), 13 M. & W. 494 ; 2 Dowl. & L. 382 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 29 1115 

Vol. I. ends with page 636, 



CXH TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOH 

King V. King (1850), 2 Roberts. 153 961, 962 

King V. Norman (1847), i C. B. 884 ; 17 L. J. C. P. 23 ; 11 Jur. 824. .533, 1097 

King V. Paddock (1820), 18 Johns. 141 172 

King ». Walker (1863), 2 H. & C. 384 ; 33 L. J. Ex. 167 207 

King V. "Waring (1803), 6 Esp. 14 263 

King V. Zimmerman (1871), 40 L. J. C. P. 278 ; L. E. 6 C. P. 466 ; 24 

L. T. 623; 19 W. E. 1009 308 

King of Two Sicilies v. "WiUoox (1851), 1 Sim. N. S. 301 966, 970 

Kingsmill v. Millard (1855), 11 Ex. 313 ; 3 C. L. R. 1022 116 

Kingston's (Duchess of) Case (1776), 20 How. St. Tr. 540 ; 2 Sm. L. C. 

642 594, 924, 925, 1107, 1110, 1111 

Kingston v. Gale (1676), Rep. temp. Mnoh, 259 60H 

Kingston v. Knibbs (1809), 1 Camp. 508, n. ; 10 E. E. 742, n 765 

Kingston v. Lesley (1824), 10 Serg. & R. 383 1048 

Kinnersley ». Orpe (1779), 1 Doug. 58 1081, 1183, 1112, 1154 

Kinsman v. Eouse (1881), 17 Ch. D. 104 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 486 ; 44 L. T. 597 ; 

29 W. E. 627 75 

Kintrea v. Perston (1856), 1 H. & N. 357 ; 25 L. J. Ex. 287 773 

Kip V. Brigham (1810), 6 Johns. 158 ; 7 Johns. 168 1097 

Kippen V. Darley (1858), 3 Macq. 203 ; 1 Paterson, 762 805 

Kirby v. Hickson (1850), 1 L. M. & P. 364 17 

Kirby v. Simpson (1854), 23 L. J. M. C. 165 ; 10 Ex. 358 ; 2 C. L. R. 

1286 ; 18 Jur. 983 40, 226, 228 

Kirohner «. Venus (1859), 12 Moore, P. 0. C. 361 ; 7 W. E. 455 ; 6 Jur. 

N. S. 732 158 

Kirk, Ex parte, Bennett and Glave, Re (1877), 5 Ch. D. 800 ; 46L. J. Bank. 

101 ; 36 L. T. 431 ; 25 W. R. 598 803 

Kirki). Eddowes (1844), 3 Hare, 517; 13 L. J. Ch. 402; 8 Jur. 1024. .753, 806, 

807, 808 

Kirkham v. Marter (1819), 2 B. & A. 613 ; 1 Chitty, R. 382 677, 678 

KirHand v. Nisbet (1859), 3 Macq. 766 ; 1 Paterson, 876 43 

Kirkman v. Oxley (1811-16), cited 2 Stark. Ev. 306, n. {k) 255 

Kirkpatrick v. Gowan (1875), Ir. R. 9 C. L. 521 776 

Kirkstall Brewery Co. v. Furness Ry. Co. (1874), L. E. 9 Q. B. 468 ; 43 L. J. 

Q. B. 142 ; 30 L. T. 783 ; 22 W. E. 876 388 

Kirkwood's case (1830), 1 Lew. C. C. 102 246 

Kirwan's Trusts, Ee (1883), 25 Ch. D. 373 ; 52 L. J. Ch. 952 ; 49 L. T. 

292 ; 32 W. R. 581 702, 7C3 

Kirwan v. Cookbum (1805), 5 Esp. 233 ; 8 R. R. 849 1093 

Kirwan v. Gorman (1846), 9 Ir. Eq. R. 154 92 

Kite and Lane's case (1822), 1 B. & C. 101 1137 

Klingeman, Goods of, Ee (1862), 3 S. & T. 18 ; SQ L. J. P. M. & A. 16 . , 1178 

Knapp V. Maltby (1835), 13 Wend. 587 1196 

Knapp's case (1830), 10 Pick. 489 562, 564 

Knatohbull v. Fowle (1876), 1 Ch. D. 604 ; -24 W. E. 629 911 

Knight V. Barber (1846), 16 M. & W. 66 ; 2 C. & K. 333 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 

18 ; 10 Jur. 929 684, 685 

Knight V. Campbell (1848), (Guildford Summer Assizes MS.) 349 

Knight V. Clements (1838), 8 A. & E. 215 ; 3 N. & P. 375 1193 

Knight V. Cox (1856), 18 C. B. 645 ; 26 L. J. C. P. 314 99 

Knight V. Crookford (1794), 1 Esp. 190 ; 5 E. E. 729 674 

Knight, Ee, Knight v. Gardner (1883), 26 Ch. D. 297 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 183 ; 

49 L. T. 545 ; 32 W. E. 469 913 

Knight V. Hasty (1843), 12 L. J. Q. B. 293 734 

Knight V. Knight (1861), 30 L. J. Ch. 644 ; 2 Giff. 616 789 

Knight J). Martin (iSW), Gow, 26 310, 1212 

Knightj). M. of Waterford(1836), 2 Y. & C. Ex. 38 601 

Knight V. M. of Waterford (1840), 4 Y. & C. 294 ; 10 L. J. Ex. Eq. 57 ; 

5 Jur. 818 ; 11 CI. & F. 653 440, 441 

Knights v. WijBfen (1870), L. E. 5 Q. B. 660 ; 40 L. J. Q. B. 51 ; 23 L. T. 

610 ; 19 W. E. 244 645 

Knill V. Hooper (1857), 2 H. & N. 277 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 377 770 

Knill V. WiUiams (1809), 10 East, 431 ; 10 R. E. 349 1194 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXIU 

PAGE 

Kuobell V. Fuller (1797), Pea. Add. Cas. 139 : 4 R. R. 896 265 

Knowles, In re (1880), 49 L. J. Ch. 625 ; 43 L. T. 132 ; 28 W. E. 975. ... 146 
Enowlman v. Bluett (1873), 43 L. J. Ex. 29 ; L. R. 9 Ex. 1 ; 29 L. T. 

462 ; 22 W. R. 77 191, 680, 682 

Knox V. Bushell (1837, should be 1857), 3 0. B. N. S. 334 167 

Knox V. Ld. Mayo (1858), 7 Ir. Ch. R. 563 1168 

Knox V. Waldoborough (1827), 5 Greenl. 185 1139 

Knox County v. Ninth National Bank (1892), 147 tJ. S. 91 133 

Koebel v. Saunders (1864), 33 L. J. C. P. 310 ; 17 C. B. N. S. 71 ; 10 Jur. 

N. S. 920 ; 12 W. R. 1106 771 

Kopitofi V. Wilson (1876), 45 L. J. Q. B. 436 ; L. R. 1 Q. B. D. 377 ; 34 

L. T. 677; 24 W. R. 706 771 

Koster v. Innes (1825), Ey. & M. 333 175 

Koster v. Reed (1826), 6 B. & C. 19 ; 9 Dowl. & R. 2 175 

Kraft V. Wickey (1832), 4 Gill. & J. 332 1160 

Krishna Behari Roy v. Brojeswani Chowdranee (1875), L. R. 2 Indian 

App. 283 1118 

Kronheim v. Johnson (1877), 7 Ch. D. 60 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 132 ; 37 L. T. 

751 ; 26 W. R. 142 665 

Kufh V. Weston (1799), 3 Esp. 54 155 

Kurtz V. Spence (1888), 57 L. J. Ch. 238 : 58 L. T. 438 606 

Kyle V. Jeffreys (1839), 3 Macq. 317 ; 1 Paterson, 850 730 

Kynaston v. Maokinder (1870), 47 L. J. Q. B. 76 ; 37 L. T. 390 41 

LAOKiNOTOif V. Atherton (1844), 7 M. & Gr. 360 ; 8 Scott, N. R. 38 ; 8 Jur. 

406 ; 13 L. J. C. P. 140 649 

Laclough V. Towle (1800), 3 Esp. 114 646 

Lacon V. Higgins (1822), 3 Stark. 178 ; Dowl. & R. N. P. C. 38 937 

Lafone v. Falkland Islands Co. (1867), 27 L. J. Ch. 25 ; 4 K. & J. 34 ; 6 

W. R. 4 599 

Laing V. Barclay (1821), 3 Stark. 42; 2 Dowl. & R. 530; IB. & C. 

398 698, 969 

Laing ii. Kaine (1800), 2 Bos. & P. 86 1212 

Lainson v. Tremere (1834), 1 A. & E. 792 ; 3 N. & M. 603 88, 93 

Laird v. Briggs (1881), 19 Ch. D. 22 ; 45 L. T. 238 192 

Lake v. Duke of Argyll (1844), 6 Q. B. 477 ; 14 L. J. Q. B. 73 641 

Lake v. Bfllers (1698), 1 Ld. Raym. 733 481 

Lake v. King (1667), 1 Wma. Saunders, 131a ; 2 Keble, 361, 462, 496, 659, 

801, 832 ;. 1 Lev. 240 ; 1 Sid. 414 4 

Lakeman v. Mountstephen (1874), 39 L. J. Q. B. 275 ; L. R. 5 Q. B. 613 ; 

41 L. J. Q. B. 67 ; L. R. 7 Q. B. 196 ; L. R. 7 H. L. 17 ; 22 W. R. 

617 ; 43 L. J. Q. B. 188 ; 30 L. T. 437 677 

Laker v. Hordem (1876), 1 Ch. D. 644 ; 24 W. R. 643 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 

316 ; 34 L. T. 88 145 

Lalorw. Lalor (1879), 4 L. R. Ir. 678 613 

Lamb V. Orton (1860), 29 L. J. Ch. 286 ; 6 Jur. 61 ; 1 L. T. 290 172 

Lamb v. Munster (1882), 52 L. J. Q. B. 46 ; 10 Q. B. T>. 110 ; 47 L. T. 

442; 31 W. R. 117 961, 964 

Lambe's case (1791), 2 Lea. 554 ; 1 McNally, Ev. 42 668 

Lambert's Estate, In re (1886), 13 L. R. Ir. 234 424, 542, 739 

Lambert, Re (1866), 35 L. J. P. & M. 64 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 138 ; 14 L. T. 

227 ; 14 W. R. 617 1031 

Lambert v. Norris (1837), 2 M. & W. 335 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 109 659 

Lamoudv. Dayall (1847), 9 Q. B. 1030 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 136 ; 11 Jur. 266. 222 

Lamont v. Crook (1840), 6 M. & W. 625 ; 8 Dowl. 737 ; 4 Jur. 489 831, 834 

Lampltigh v. Lamplugh (1709), 1 P. Wms. 112 666 

Lampon v. Corke (1834, should be 1822), 5 B. & Aid. 606 ; 1 Dowl. & 

R. 211 93, 652 

Lamprell ». Billericay Union (1849), 3 Ex. 283 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 282. .639, 642, 645 

Lananze v. Palmer (1827), M. & M. 31 31« 

Lancaster Canal Co.'s case (1832), Mon. & B. 94 ; 1 Deao. & Ch. 411 ; 1 

Mont. 116 .' 683 

Vol. I, ends with page 635. 



CXIV TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAQB 

Landers and Bagley's Contract, (1892) 3 Ch. 41 ; 61 L. J. Oh. 707 ; 67 

L. T. 521 670 

Lane's oaae (1587), 2 Co. Rep. 17 b 8, 19, 20 

Lane's oase (1863), 1 De G. J. & S. 504 ; 33 L. J. Ch. 84 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 

25 134 

Lane, In re (1880), 14 Ch. D. 856 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 768 ; 43 L. T. 87 ; 28 

W. B. 764 146 

Lane v. Burghart (1841), 1 Q,. B. 933 ; 1 G. & D. 312 ; 6 Jur. 155 677, 678 

Lanet'. Gray (1873), L. R. 16 Eq. 552 ; 43 L. J. Ch. 187 1182 

Lane ;;. Harrison (1820), 6 Munf. 573 1139 

Lane v. Ironmonger (1844), 13 M. & "W. 368 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 35 166 

Lane v. Nixon (1866), L. R. 1 C. P. 412 ; 35 L. J. C. P. 243 ; 12 Jur. 

N. S. 392 ; 14 W. R. 641 771 

Lanfranohi v. Mackenzie (1857), 36 L. J. Ch. 518 ; L. R 4 Eq. 421 ; 15 

W. R. 614 ; 16 L. T. 114 76 

Lang V. Gale (1813), 1 M. & S. Ill 740 

Lang V. Smith (1838, should be 1831), 7 Bing. 284 ; 5 M. & P. 78 42 

Langdale v. Trimmer (1812), 15 East, 291 32 

Langdale v. Whitfield (1858), 3 K. & J. 426, 432 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 706 ; 27 

L. J. Ch. 795 ; 6 "W. R. 862 146 

Langdon v. Hulls (1804), 4 Q. B. D. 337 ; 48 L. J. M. C. 113 ; 40 L. T. 

880 ; 27 W. R. 657 317 

Langford ». Selmes (1867), 3 K. & J. 220 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 859 98 

Langford v. Woods (1844), 8 Scott, N. R. 369 ; 7 M. & Gr. 625 227 

Langhorn ». AUnutt (1812), 4 Taun. 511 ; 13 R. R. 663 388 

Langley v. E. of Oxford (1836), 1 M. & W. 508 ; 2 Gale, 63 ; 1 T. & G. 

808 ; 5 L. J. Ex. 166 605 

Langmead v. Maple (1865), 18 C. B. N. S. 255 ; 12 L. T. 143 ; 13 W. R. 

469: 11 Jur. N. S. 177 1117, 1138 

Langridge v. Campbell (1877), 2 Ex. D. 281 ; 46 L. J. Ex. 277 ; 36 L. T. 

64 ; 25 W. R. 351 536 

Langston v. Cotton (1795), Peake, Add. Cas. 21 837 

Langton v. Carleton (1873), L. R. 9 Ex. 57 ; 43 L. J. Ex. 54 ; 29 L. T. 

660 1.52 

Langton v. Higgins (1859), 4 H. & N. 402 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 252 690 

Lanyon v. Martin (1884), 13 L. R. Ir. 297 688 

La Plata (1855), 1 Swab. Adm. R. 298 6 

Lapsley v. Grierson (1848), 1 H. L. Cas. 498 106, 149 

Lascelles v. Ld. Onslow (1877), 2 Q B. D. 433, 450 ; 46 L. J. Q. B. 343 ; 

36 L. T. 459 ; 25 W. R. 496 115 

Lassence v. Tiemey (1849), 1 Mao. & G. 351 ; 2 H & T. 115 ; 14 Jur. 182 679 

Lasseux v. Tyroounel (1846), 10 Beav. 28 1151 

Latch V. Wedlake (1840), 3 P. & D. 499 ; 11 A. & E. 959 386 

Latkow V. Earner (1795), 2 H. Bl. 437 1102 

La Touche v. Hutton (1875), 9 Ir. R. Eq. 166 445 

Latter v. Goolden, (1894) 10 Nov. (not reported) 618, 619, 620 

Lauderdale, Peerage (1885), 10 App. Cas. 692 1177 

Laver v. Fielder (1862), 11 W. R. 245 ; 7 L. T. 602 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 190 . . 539 
Laverry v. Pursell (1888), 39 Ch. D. 508 ; 57 L. J. Ch. 570 ; 58 L. T. 846; 

37 W. R. 163 687 

Lavie v. PhilHps (1765), 3 Burr. 1776 ; 1 W. Bl. 750 7 

Lavies, In re. Ex parte Stephens (1877), 7 Ch. D. 127 ; 47 L. J. Bk. 22 ; 

37 L. T. 613 ; 26 W. R. 136 662 

Law V. Wilkin (1837), 6 A. & E. 718 : 1 N. & P. 697 ; W. ^V. & D. 235.. 168 

La-wdon v. La-wdon (1885), 5 Ir. R. 27 922 

Lawes, In re (1882), 20 Ch. D. 81 ; 46 L. T. 480 ; 30 W. R. 33 805 

Lawes v. Reed (1836), 2 Lewin, 0. C. 152 926 

Lawler v. Linden (1876), Ir. R. 10 C. L. 188 36 

Lawless v. Queale (1845), 8 Ir. L. R. 382 292 

Lawley's, Lady, case (undated) Bull. N. P. 287 893 

Lawrence v. Baker (1830), 5 Wend. 306 946 

Lawrence v. Campbell (1869), 4 Drew. 485 ; 28 L. J. Ch. 780 ; 7 W. R. 

336 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 1071 699 



The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXT 

PAGE 

I/a-wrence v. Clark (1845), 3 Bowl. & L. 87 ; 14 M. & W. 250 ; 15 L. J. 

Ex. 40 314, 318 

Lawrence v. Hitch (1868), L. R. 3 Q. B. 521 ; 37 L. J. Q. B. 209 ; 9 B. & 

S. 467 ; 18 L. T. 483 ; 16 W. R. 813 123 

Lawrence v. Houghton (1809), 5 Johns. 129 906 

Lawrence v. Lawrence (1884), 26 Ch. D. 796 ; 53 L. J. Ch. 982 ; 50 L. T. 

715 ; 32 W. R. 791 140 

Lawrence v. Maule (1859), 4 Drew. 472 ; 7 "W. R. 314 325 

Lawrence :;. "Walmeley (1862), 31 L. J. C. P. 143 ; 12 0. B. N. S. 799 ; 

5L. T. 798; 10 W. R. 344 758 

Lawrenson v. Butlec (1802), 1 Soh. & Lef. 13 675 

Laws V. Rand (1857), 27 L. J. C. P. 76 ; 3 0. B. N. S. 442 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 

74 32 

Lawson v. Carr (1856), 10 Moo. P. C. C. 162 6 

Lawson v. Stoddart (1853), 3 New R. 241 ; 9 L. T. 569 ; 12 W. R. 286 ; 

10 Jur. N. S. 33 844 

Laybonnie v. Crisp (1838), 4 M. & W. 320 ; 8 C. & P. 397 ; 1 H. & H. 

326 397, 40.5, 406, 1035, 1036 

Layer's case (1722), 16 How. St. Tr. 93 236, 318, 625 

Layland v. Stewart (1876), 46 L. J. Ch. 103 ; 4 Ch. D. 419 ; 25 "W. R. 

225 651 

Laythoarp v. Bryant (1836), 3 Scott, 238 ; 2 Bing. N. C. 735 ; 2 Hodges, 

25 ....:..... 670, 675 

Lazonhy v. Rawson (1854), 4 De G. M. & G. 556; 24 L. J. Ch. 482; 1 Jur. 

N. S. 289 553 

Lea V. "Wheatley (1678), cited in 20 How. St. Tr. 574 603 

Leach, In goods of (1890), 63 L. T. 191 705 

Leach, Re (1848), 6 Notes of Cas. (Ecc. & M.) 92 697 

Leach ti. Buchanan (1803), 4 Esp. 228 546 

Leach v. Simpson (1839), ft M. & W. 309 ; 9 Dowl. P. C. 13 ; 3 Jur. 654.. 283 

Leader, Lessee of v. Duggan (1841), Ir. Cir. R. 124 , , 314 

Leader v. Barry (1795), 1 Esp. 353 373, 1048 

Leaf *. Butt (1842), C.> & Marsh. 451 314 

Leake v. M. of Westmeath (1841), 2 M. & Rob. 391 1035 

Leame v. Bray (1814), 3 East, 593 ; 5 Esp. 18 ; 7 R. R. Preface vii 6 

Learmouth, Ex parte (1821), 6 Madd. 113 353 

Learoyd, Ex parte. Re Foulds (1878), 10 Ch. D. 3; 48 L. J. Bank. 17; 

27 W. R. 277 ; 39 L. T. 525 1157 

Leary v. Lloyd (1860), 3 E. & E. 178 ; 29 L. J. M. C. 194 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 

1246 1175 

Leather Cloth Co.«. Hieronimus (1875), L. R. 10 Q. B. 140; 44 L. J. 

Q. B. 54; 32 L. T. 307; 23 W. R. 593 673, 752 

Le Caux v. Eden (1781), 2 Doug. 594 1103 

Lechmerej). Fletcher (1833), 1 C. & M. 623; 3 Tyr. 450 711, 713, 1115 

Ledbetter v. Salt (1828), 4 Bing. 623 ; 1 M. & P. 597 518 

Ledgard «). Thompson (1843), 11 M. & W. 40 ; 2 Dowl. N. S. 766; 12 

L. J. Ex. 229; 7 Jur. 2i 9 734 

Lee Peerage (should be Leigh), (undated), Min. Ev. 155, Pt. 2 1179 

Lee «. Angas (1866), 35 L. J. Ch. 373 ; 14 L. T. 324 ; 14 W. R. 667 813 

Lee*. Birrell (1813), 3 Camp. 337 ; 1 M. & Sel. 482 595, 617 

Lee V. Dick (1836), 10 Pet. 482 755 

Lee V. Everest (1857), 2 H. & N. 285 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 334 820 

Lee V. Gansel (1774), 1 Cowp. 1 ; LofEt, 374 1031 

Lee V. Gaskell (1876), 1 Q. B. D. 700 ; 45 L. J. Q. B. 540 ; 34 L. T. 759 ; 

24 W. R. 824 683 

Lee V. Griffin (1861), 1 B. & 8. 272 ; 30 L. J. Q. B. 252 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 

1302 ; 4 L. T. 54B ; 9 W. R. 702 688 

Lee V. Huson (1791), Peake, 166 244 

Lee V. Johnstone (1869), L. R. 1 H. L. (So.) 426 129 

Lee i>. Lane. & Torks. Rail. Co. (1871), L. R. 6 Ch. 527 ; 25 L. T. 77 ; 

19 W. R. 729 552, 744 

Lee V. Meecock (1805), 6 Esp. 177 1031 

Lee V. Merest (1870), 39 L. J. Ecc. 63 ; 22 L. T. 420 ; . . . 322 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CXVl TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PACT 

Lee V. Pain (1814), 4 Hare, 201 ; 14 L. J. Ch. 346 ; 9 Jur. 127 ..740, 795, 803; 

808 

Lee V. Smith (1854), L. R. 9 Ex. 662 ; 23 L. J. Ex. 198 664 

Lee V. Wilmot (1866), L. R. 1 Ex. 364; 35 L. J. Ex. 175 ; 14 L. T. 627 ; 

14 W. K. 993; 4H. & C. 469; 12 Jur. N. S. 762 711 

Leech v. Bates (1849), 1 Roberts. 714 697 

Leeds, Duke of, v. Lord Amherst (1846), 2 Ph. 117 ; 10 Jur. 956 74 

Leeds ». Cook (1803), 4 Esp. 256 ; 6 R. R. 855 103, 255, 318 

Leeds v. Lancashire (1809), 2 Camp. 205 ; 755 

Leeds and County Bank v. Walker (1883), 11 Q. B. D. 84 ; 52 L. J. Q. B. 

590 ; 47 J. P. 502 1195 

Leeds and Thirsk Ry. Co. v. Feamley (1849), 5 Railw. Cas. 644 ; 4 Ex. 

26 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 330 ; 7 Dowl. & L. 68 100 

Lees V. Marton (1832), 1 M. & Rob. 210 381 

Lees V. Whitoomb (182H), 5 Bing. 34 ; 2 M. & P. 86 ; 3 C. & P. 289 .... 669 

Leesou v. Holt (1816), 1 Stark. 186 ; 18 R. R. 758 1096 

Leete v. Hart (1868), L. R. 3 C. P. 322 ; 37 L. J. C. P. 157 ; 18 L. T. 

292 ; 16 W. R. 676 227 

Leferre v. Lloyd (1814), 5 Taun. 749 ;. 1 Marsh. 318 ; 16 R. R. 644 758 

Lefroy v. Walsh (1851), 1 Ir. C. L. R. 31 1 128 

Legeyt v. O'Brien (1834), Milw. 334 170 

Leggatt V. ToUervey (1811). 14 East, 301 ; 12 R. R. 618. . . .600, 979, 987, 109S 
Legge V. Edmonds h856), 25 L. J. Ch. 125 ; 4 W. R. 71 . . . . 101, 495, 621, 622 
Leggott V. Great North. Ry. Co. (1876), 1 Q. B. D. 699 ; 45 L. J. Q. B. 

657 ; 35 L. T. 334 ; 24 W. R. 784 92 

Legh V. He-witt (1803), 4 East, 164 ; 7 R. R. 645 782 

Legh v.. Legh (1820), 1 Boa. & P. 447 487 

Leicester, Earl of, v. Walter (1809). 2 Camp. 251 ; 3 Camp. 241, n 255 

Leidemann v. Schultz (1853), 14 C. B. 38 ; 2 C. L. R. 87 ; 23 L. J. Ch. 

17 ; 18 Jur. 42 763 

Leifohild's case (1865), L. R 1 Eq. 231 ; 13 L. T. 267 ; 14 W. R. 22 ; 

11 Jut. 941 748 

Leigh's Kitate, In re, Rowcliffe v. Leigh (1877), 6 Ch. DIt. 256 ; 37 L. T. 

557 ; 26 "W. R. 783 1189 

Leigh Peerage (1828-9), Pari. Min. 307 ; Pari. Min. (Pt. 2), 145.. 416, 422, 42S, 

116-7 
Leigh V. Baker (1867), 2 C. B. N. S. 367 ; 26 L. J. C. P. 220 ; 3 Jur. 

N. S. 668 186 

Leigh V. Jack (1879), 49 L. J. Ex. 220; 6 Ex. D. 264 ; 42 L. T. 463 ; 

28 W. R. 452 ; 44 J. P. 488 112 

Leigh V. Lloyd (1865), 35 Beav. 465 ; 34 L. J. Ch. 646 ; 2 De G. J. & S. 

330 1208 

Leighton v. Leighton (1720), 1 Str. 308 ; Hubb. Ev. of Suco. 590 1040 

Leighton v. Leighton (1874), 43 L. J. Ch. 594 ; L. R. 18 Eq. 458 ; 22 

W. R. 727 806 

Leland v. Murphy (1866), 16 Ir. Ch. R. 600 710 

Lemage v. Goodban (1865), 35 L. J. P. & M. 28 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 67. .704, 711 
Lemaitre ». Davis (1881), 19 Ch. D. 281 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 173 ; 46 L. T. 407 ; 

30 W. R. 360; 46 J. P. 324 114 

Le Marohant's Gardner's Peerage case (Banbury Peerage, 1727), Selw. 

N. P. 672 -674 101 

Le Marohant ». Le Marohant and RadolifE (1876), 46 L. J. P. D. & A. 43 ; 

34 L. T. 367 ; 24 W. R. 374 602 

Lemayne v. Stanley (1681), 3 Lev. 1 674 

Lemere v. Elliott (1861), 30 L. J. Ex. 360 ; 6 H. & N. 656 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 

1206 ; 4 L. T. 304 117 

Lemon d. Dean (1810), 2 Camp. 636, n 1209 

Lempriere v. Lauge (1879), 12 Ch. D. 675; 41 L. T. 378; 27 W. R. 

879 100 

Lench v. Lench (1805), 10 Vea. 511 564, 556, 667 

Le NeuvOle v. Nourse (1813), 3 Camp. 361 776 

Leonard v. Simpson (1835), 2 Bing. N. C. 176 ; 2 Soott, 335 ; 1 Hodges, 261 532 
Leonard v. Taylor (1874), I. R. 8 0. L. 300 774 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXVll 

PAOH 

Lepiot ». Browne (1703), 1 Salk. 7 ICS 

Lepping v. Kedgewin (1675), 1 Mod. 207 H39 

Leroux v. Brown (1852), 12 C. B. 801 ; 22 L. J. C. P. 1 ; 16 Jur. 1021. .52, 681 

Leslie v. Be la Torre (1795), cited 12 East, 583 ; 11 R. B,. 578 756 

Leslie v. Leslie (1872), I. E. 6 Eq. 332 704 

Lessee of Leader v. Duggan (1841), Ir. Cir. R. 124 314 

Les.see of Phayre v. Pahy (1832), Hay. & Jon. 128 47 

Le Strange v. Eowe (1865), 4 F. & E. 1048 124 

Le Sueur v. Le Sueur (1876), 1 P. D. 139 ; 45 L. J. P. D. & A. 73 ; 34 

L. T. 511 ; 24 W. R. 616 1144 

Lethulier's case (1692), 2 Salk. 443 764 

Le Trinidad v. Browne (1887), 36 W. R. 138; reported on another point, 

37 Ch. Div. 1 ; 57 L. J. Ch. 87 912 

Lett V. Randall (1860), 2 Sm. & Gifi. 83 ; 2 De G. E. & J. 388 ; 6 Jur. 

N. 8. 1359; 9 W. R. 130; 3 L. T. 455 ; 30 L. J. Cli. 110 144 

Lever v. Goodwin (1887), 36 Oh. D. 1 ; 57 L. T. 583 ; 36 W. R. 177 .... 939 
Levey and Rohson, Re, Ex parte Topping (1865), 34 L. J. Bank. 44 ; 12 

L. T. 787 ; 13 W. R. 1025 716 

Levin!). Levin (1889), 60 L. T. 317 ; 37 W. R. 396 914 

Levinsoni). Syer (1852), 21 L. J. Q. B. 16; 2L. M. & P. 557 ; 15 Jur. 10.. 11733 

Levitt V. Levitt (1865), 2 H. & M. 626 1030 

Levy V. Hale (1849), 29 L. J. 0. P. 127 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 702 ; 1 L. T. 132 ; 

8 W. R. 126 549 

Levy V. MerriU (1826), 4 Greenl. 180 669 

Levy V. Pope (1829), M. & M. 410 609 

Lewes' Trusts, Re (1871), L. R. 11 Eq. 236; L. R. 6 Ch. App. 356 ; 40 

L. J. Ch. 602 ; 24 L. T. 533; 19 W. R. 195, 617 172 

Lewis, Re, Ex parte Munro (1876), 1 Q. B. D. 724 ; 45 L. J. Q. B. 816 ; 

36 L. T. 857 ; 24 W. R. 1017 724 

Lewis, Re (««« Lewis v. Lewis). 

Lewis, falsely called H., v. Hayward (1865), 35 L. J. P. & M. 105 167 

Lewis V. Brass (1878), 3 Q. B. D. 667 ; 37 L. T. 738 ; 26 W. E. 162 .... 673 
Lewis ». Evans (1874), 44 L. J. C. P. 41 ; L. R. 10 C. P. 297 ; 31 L. T. 

487 ; 23 "W. R. 244 ; 2 Hopw. & C. 279 156 

Lewis V. Gt. West. Ry. Co. (1860), 6 H. & N. 867 ; 29 L. J. Ex. 426 .... 723 
Lewis V. Gt. "West. Ry. Co. (1877), 3 Q. B. D. 195 ; 47 L. J. Q. B. 131 ; 

37 L. T. 774 ; 26 W. R. 255 723 

Lewis «. Hartley (1835), 7 0. & P. 406 1192 

Lewis V. James (1886), 64 L. T. 260 912 

Lewis V. Ld. Kensington (1846), 2 0. B. 463 ; 3 Dowl. & L. 637 ; 15 L. J. 

P. 100 734 

Lewis V. Lewis (1862), 2 S. & T. 153 ; 4 L. T. 583 ; 31 L. J. P. 153 ; 7 

Jur. N. S. 688 700 

Lewis f . Marshall (1844), 7 M. & Gr. 743 ; 8 Scott, N. E. 729 ; 13 L. J. 

C. P. 193 ; 8 Jur. 848 26, 763, 782 

Lewis ». Parker (1836), 4 A. & E. 838 261 

Lewis V. Payn (1827), 8 Cowen, 71 1198, 1199 

Lewis V. Pennington (1860), 29 L. J. Ch. 670 ; 8 W. R. 466 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 

478 605 

Lewis V. Roberts (1861), 11 0. B. N. S. 23 ; K. & O. 402 ; 31 L. J. C. P. 

61 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 485 ; 5 L. T. 351 ; 10 W. R. 80 726 

Lewis «). Sapio (1827), 1 M. & M. 616 1220 

Lewis V. Simpson (1848), 2 Ex. 196, u 146 

Lexington v. Clark (1690), 2 Vent. 223 678 

Ley*. BaUard (1790), 3 Esp. 173, n 1209 

Ley V. Barlow (1848), 1 Ex. 801 ; 6 Railw. Cas. 1 ; 5 Dowl. & L. 375 ; 17 

L. J. Ex. 105 321 

Leyfiold's, Dr., case (1610), 10 Co. Rep. 88 11S<8 

Leyland v. Stewart (1876), 46 L. J. Oh. 103 ; 4 Ch. D. 419 ; 25 W. R. 225 661 

Lidster v. Borrow (1839), 9 A. & E. 664 227 

Liebman v. Pooley (1816), 1 Stark. R. 167 ; 18 R. R. 756 278, a58 

Lightfoot V. Bickley (1830), 2 Rawle, 431 1151 

Lightfoot 41. Cameron (1776), 2 W. BI. 1113 668 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CXVUl TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAGE 

TAffhttier v. Wike (1818), 4 Serg. & E. 203 324 

Like V. Howe (1806), 6 Esp. 20 542 

Lilley v. Elwin (1843, should be 1848), 11 Q. B. 742 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 132 ; 

12 Jur 623 36, 153 

Lilly & Co. V. Smales, (1892) 1 Q. B. 456 ; 40 W. R. 544 764 

Lilly white v. Devereux (1846), 16 M. & W. 291 48, 691 

Limehouse Board of Works, Ex parte Vallanoe (1883), 24 Ch. D. 177 ; 52 

L. J. Ch. 791 ; 48 L. T. 941 ; 32 W. R. 287 1151 

Limerick v. Limerick (1863), 32 L. J. P. & M. 22 ; 4 S. & T. 262 ; 11 W. R. 

503 130, 294 

Lincoln's case, Earl of (1626), 1 Bl. Com. 402 ; 3 Bao. Abr. 202 900 

Lincoln f. "Wright (1859), 28 L. J. Ch. 70-5 : 4 De G. & J. 16 688,, 920 

Liadenau v. Desborough (1828), 8 B. & C. 586 934 

Lindenberger v. Beal (1821), 6 Wheat. 104 155 

Lindgren v. Lindgren (1846), 9 Beav. 358 ; 15 L. J. Ch. 428 ; 10 Jur. 674 802 
Lindley v. Girdler (1843), 1 Dowl. & L. 699 ; 13 L. J. Q. B -iS ; 8 Jur. 61 734 
Lindlev v. Lacey (1864), 17 C. B N. S. 578 ; 34 L. J. C. P. 7 ; 10 Jur. 

N. S". 1103; 11 L. T. 273 ; 13 W. R. 80 745, 746 

Lindo V. Rodney (1782), 2 Doug. 614 1103 

Lindon v. Sharp (1843), 6 M. & Gr. 898 ; 7 Soott, N. R. 730 ; 13 L. J. 

C. P. 67 136 

Lindsay v. Wicklow, Earl of (1873), Ir. R. 7 Eq. 192 93 

Linnell and Walker v. Gunn (1867), L. R. 1 Adm. & Eoo. 363 ; 36 L. J. 

Eoo. 23 1133 

Linsellf. Bonsor (1835). 2 Bing. N C. 241 ; 2 Soott, 399; 1 Hodges, 305.. 44, 712 
Lion, The, Owners v. York Town Owners (1869), 38 L. J. Adm. 51 ; L. R. 

2 P. C. 525 ; 21 L. T. 41 ; 17 W. R. 993 ; 6 Moo. P. C. 0. N. S. 163 . . 178 

Lipsoombe v. Holmes (1810), 2 Camp. 441 520 

Lisbon Steam Tramways Co., Re (1876), 2 Ch. D. 575 ; 34 L. T. 209 ; 25 

W. R. 516 845 

Lisburne, Lord v. Davies (1866), L. R. 1 C. P. 259 ; 35 L. J. C.P. 193 ; 12 

Jur. N. S. 340 ; 13 L. T. 795 : 14 W. R. 333 ; 1 H. & R. 172 116 

Lishman v. Christie (1887), 19 Q. B. D. 333 ; 56 L. J. Q. B. 538 ; 57 L. T. 

562 ; 35 W. R. 744 ; 6 Asp. M. C. 186 766 

L'Isle Peer. (1825). Pari. Min. 116 423 

List's case (1814), 2 Ves. & B. 374 869 

Lister f. Leather (1868), 27 L. J. Q. B. 295; 8 E. & B. 1004; 4 Jur. 

N. S. 947 47 

Lister «. Perrymau (1870), L. R. 4 H. L. 621 ; 39 L. J. Ex. 177 ; 23 L. T. 

N. S. 269 : 19 W. R. 9 29 

Lister v. Priestly (1810), Wightw. 67, 405 518 

Li.ster v. Smith (1863), 33 L. J. P. & M. 29 ; 3 S. & T. 282 746 

Litchfield v. Ready (1850), 5 Ex. 939 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 51 98, 1113 

Little 1). Larrabee (1822), 2 Greenl. 37, 41, n 616 

Little V. Libby (1823), 2 Greenl. 242 443 

Little V. Wingfield (1859), 11 Ir. C. L. R. 63 123, 124, 125 

Littlechild v. Banks (1845), 7 Q. B. 739 ; 14 L. J. Q. B. 356 ; 9 Jur. 1096 222 

Littler «!. Holland (1790), 3 T. R 590 751, 752 

Litton V. Murphy (1878), 1 L. R. Ir. 301 353 

Liver Alkali Co. v. Johnson (1874), L. R. 9 Ex. 338; 43 L. J. Ex. 216 ; 31 

L. T. 95 771 

Livermore v. Herschell (1826), 3 Pick. 33 1U8 

Liverpool Adelphi Loan Assoc, v. Fairhurst (1854), 9 Ex. 423 ; 2 C. L. R. 

512; 23 L. J. Ex. 163; 18 Jur. 191 541 

Liverpool Borough Bank v. Eccles (1859), 4 H. & N. 139 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 122 675 
Liverpool Borousfh Bank v. Turner (I860), 1 J. & H. 169 ; 2 De G. F. & 

J. 502 ; 30 L. J. Ch. 379 651 

Llanover v. Homfray (1880), 19 Ch. D. 224 ; 30 W. R. 557 326 

Llewellyn v. Jersey, Earl of (1843), 11 M. & W 189 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 243. .672, 758 

LleweUyn v. Winckworth (1845), 13 M. & W. 598 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 329 241 

Lloyd V. Fleming (1872), W. N. 1872, at p. 6 652 

Lloyd V. Gregory (1638), Cro. Car. 501 65S 

Lloyd ». Harvey (1832), 2 Russ. & My. 310 807 

The references are to pages, not to paragraplis. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXIX 

FAOH 

Lloyd V. Maund (1788), 2 T. R. 760 44 

Lloydj;. Moetyn (1842), lOM. &W. 481; 2Dowl. N. S. 476; 12L.J.Ex.l 600 

Llojd V. Passingham (1809), 16 Ves. 64 970 

Lloyd V. Roberts (1858), 12 Moo. P. C. C. 158 697 

Lloyd «>. Sandiland (1818), Gow, R. 13, 16 154 

Lloyd V. SpiUet (1740), 2 Atk. 150 666 

Lloyd V. Waterford & Lim. Ry. Co. (1862), 15 Ir. C. L. R. 37 723 

Lloyd V. WUlan (1794), 1 Esp. 178 499 

Lobb V. Stanley (1844), 5 Q. B. 574 : 13 L. J. Q. B. 117 673, 674, 713 

Lock V. Furze (1866), L. R. 1 C. P. 441 ; 35 L. J. C. P. 141 ; H. & R. 379 ; 

14 W. R. 403 773 

Lock V. Norborne (1687), 3 Mod. 141 1113 

Locke «>. James (1843), 11 M. &W. 901; 13 L. J. Ex. 186 708 

Lockett V. Gary (1864), 3 New R. 405 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 144 321, 1184 

Lockett V. Nioklin (1848), 2 Ex. 93 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 403 744, 757 

Lookwood V. Smith (1812), 5 Day, 309 493 

Lodge V. Phipher (1824), 11 Serg. & R. vn 1228 

Lodge V. Priohard (1863), 3 De G. M. & G. 906 ; 1 8m. & G. App. viii. .462, 527 

LofPus V. Maw (1862), 3 Gife. 592 : 32 L. J. Oh. 49 539 

Login V. Prin. of Coorg (1862), 30 Beav. 632 8 

Londesborough's, Lord, case (1853), 4 De G. M. & G. 41 1 ; 22 L. J. Ch. 736 529 
Londesborough, Lord v. Foster (1863), 3 B. & S. 805 ; 32 L. J. Q. B. 225 ; 

9 Jur. N. S. 1173 ; 8 L. T. 240 ; 11 W. R. 593 529 

London v. Lynn (1789), 1 H. Bl. 214, n. (s) 1175 

Lond. & Birm. Ry. Go's case (1838), 3 M. & W. 422 ; 1 H. & H. l-i6 683 

Lond. & Brigh. Ry. Co. v. Fairolough (1841), 2 M. & Gr. 705 ; 2 Railw. 

Cas. 544 ; 3 Scott, N. R. 68 ; 10 L. J. C. P. 133 1192, 1204 

Loud. Chart. Bk. of Australia v. White (1878), L. R. 4 App. Cas. 413 ; 48 

L. J. P. C. 75 5 

Lond., City of v. Gierke (1690), Garth. 181 397 

Lond., City of v. Perkins (1734), 3 Bro. P. C. 602 327 

Lond., City of. Gas Light and Coke Company v. Nichols (1826), 2 C. & P. 

365 641 

Lond. Comm. of Sewers «. Gellatly (1876), 45 L. J. Ch. 788; 3 Ch. D. 

610; 24 W. R. 346, 1059 1113 

Lond. Comm. of Sewers v. Glasse (1873), 42 L. J. Ch. 345 1183 

Lond. (shouW be Dublin), Corp. of v. Judpe (1847), 11 Ir. L. R. 8 729 

Lond. Dock Co. o. Sinnott (1857), 8 E. & B. 347 ; 27 L. J. Q. B. 129 ; 4 

Jur. N. S. 70 642 

Lond. Gas L. Co. v. Chelsea Ves. (1859), 28 L. J. C. P. 275 ; 6 C. B. N. S. 

411 1185 

Lond. Gas Meter Co., Re, The (1872), 41 L. J. Ch. 145 ; 20 W. R. 394 . . 845 

Lond., Mayor of v. Loner (1807), 1 Camp. 22 ; 10 R. R. 618 791 

Lond. School Board v. Harvey (1879), 4 Q. B. D. 451; 48 L. J. M. C. 

130 ; 27 W. R. 786 1033, 1072 

Loud. & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Durham (1856). 18 C. B. 826 ; 4 "W. R. 653 . . 723 

Lond. & N. W. Ry. Co. ». M'Michael (1850), 5 Ex. 855 ; 14 Jur. 987 100, 

1176 
Lond. & N. W. Ry. Co. v. West (1867), L. R. 2 C. P. 553; 36 L.J. C. P. 

245 97, 98 

Lond. & S. West. Bk. v. Wentworth (1880), 6 Ex. D. 96 ; 49 L. J. Ex. 

657 ; 42 L. T. 188 ; 28 W. R. 516 547, 1205 

Lonergan v. Roy. Ex. Ass. (1831), 7 Bing. 725, 729 ; 1 Dowl P. C. 233 ; 

6 M. & P. 805 818 

Long's case (1797), 1 Hayw. 624 (455) 560 

Long v. Barrett (1846), 7 Ir. L. R. 439 ; 8 Ir. L. R. 331 ; 3 H. L. Cas. 

396 46, 242 

Long V. Champion (1831), 2 B. & Ad. 284 485 

Long V. Donegan (1880), I. R. 7 Eq. 494 1234 

Long V. Hitchcock (1840), 9 C. & P. 619 954 

Long V. Keightley (1877), 11 Ir. R. C. L. 221 253 

Long V. Lamkin (1852), 9 Gush. 361, 365 974 



Vol. I. ends with page 633. 



CXX TABLE OF CASES CITED, 

Long V. Malar (1878), 4 C. P. D. 450 ; 48 L. J. C. P. 596 ; 41 L. T. 306 ; 

27 W. B,. 720 672 

Longchamp v. Pish (1807), 2 Bos. & P. N. R. 415 ; 9 R. B,. 670 140 

Longenecker v. Hyde (181:)), 6 Binn. 1 508 

Longfellow v. Williams (1804), Peake, Add. C. 225 673 

Longworth v. Yelverton (1867), L. R. 1 H. L. (So.) 218 ; 4 Maoq. 746 ; 

10 Jut. N S. 1209 ; 11 L T. 118 ; 13 W. R. 235 876 

Loomis V. Green (1831), 7 Greenl. 386 1118 

Loomis V. Jackson (1822), 19 Johns. 449 802 

Loomis and Jackson v. Loomis (1854), 3 Deane, Verm. R. 198 386 

Lopez V. Andrew (1826), 3 M. & R. 329 a 112, 123 

Lord V. Colvm (1854), 2 Drew. 205 ; 23 L. J. Ch. 469 ; 5 De G. M. & G. 

27 927 

Lord V. Colvin (1855), 3 Drew. 222 ; 24 L. J. Ch. 517 ; 4 W. R 455 . .943, 946 

Lord V. Colvin (1857), 4 Drew. 366 ; 28 L. J. Ch. 361 377 

Lord V. Colvin (1859-1860), 28 L. J. Ch. 361; 1 Drew. & Sm. 24 ; 29 L. J. 

Ch. 297 ; 8 W. R. 254 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 189 8, 179, 180, 377 

Lord V. Commiss. for City of Sydney (1859). 12 Moo. P. C. R. 473 HI 

Lord V. Lord (1856), 5 E. & B. 404 ; 26 L. J. Q. B. 34 1039 

Loring V. Steineman (1840) , 1 Meto. 204 172 

Lothian v. Henderson a8U3), 3 Bos. & P. 499, 517 ; 7 R. R. 829 1149 

LoTat's, Ld., case (1746), 18 How. St. Tr. 596 909, 910 

Lovat Peerage (1826-57), Pari. Min. 89 416, 419, 424, 425 

Lovat Peerage case (1885), 10 App. Cas. 763 421 

Love, In re. Green «;. Tribe (1878), 9 Ch. D. 231 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 7h3 701 

Lovell V. Wallis (1884), 53 L. J. Ch. 495 ; 49 L. T. 593 911 

Loveridge v. Botham (1797), 1 Bos. & P. 49 652 

Lovesy v. Smith (1880), 15 Ch. D. 655 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 809 ; 43 L. T. 240 ; 

28 "W. R. 979 749 

Low's ease, (1827), 4 Greenl. 439 615, 616 

Lowe V. Carpenter (1851), 6 Ex. 825 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 374 ; 15 Jur. 883 . .76, 119 

Lowe V. Govett (1832), 3 B & Ad. 862 ; 1 L. J. K. B. 224 112 

Lowe V. London & N. W. Ry. Co. (1852), 7 Railw. Cas. 624 ; 18 Q. B. 

632 ; 21 L. J. Q. B. 361 ; 17 Jur. 375 643 

Lowe V. Peers (1768), 4 Burr. 2225 85 

Lowick's case (1696), 13 How. St. Tr. 267 236 

Lowrey v. Barker (1880), 5 Ex. D. 170 ; 49 L. J. Ex. 433 ; 42 L. T. 215 ; 

28 W. R. 55^ 662 

Loyd V. Ereshfield (1826), 2 C. & P. 325 595, 927 

Lubbock V. Tribe (1838), 3 M. & W. 607 ; 1 H. & H. 160 ; 7 L. J. Ex. 

158 307 

Lucas V. Beale (1851), 10 C. B. 739 ; 20 L. J. C. P. 134'. 194 

Lucas V. Bristow (18o8), 27 L. J. Q. B. 364 ; E. B. & E. 907 ; 5 Jur. N. 

S. 68 763, 768 

Lucas V. Cooke (1880), 13 Ch. D. 872 ; 42 L. T. 180 ; 28 W. R. 439 .... 1002 

Lucas V. De la Cour (1813), 1 M. & Sel. 249 ; 14 R. R. 426 488 

Lucas V. Groning (1816), 7 Taun. 164 763 

Lucasi-. Tarleton (18.i8), 27 L. J. Ex. 246; 3 H. & N. 116 191 

Lucas V. Williams, (1892) 2 Q. B. 113 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 695 ; 66 L. T. 

706 310 

Lucey v. Murphy (1873), 7 Ir. R. C. L. 494 733 

Lucker, Ex parte {see Re Wood). 

Luckie v. Bushby (1853), 13 C. B. 864 ; 1 C. L. R. 685 ; 22 L. J. C. P. 

220 . 562 

Lucy !).'Mouflet'('l86b), 5H. &N. 229 ; 29 L. j. Ex. lib .............. 626 

Luders v. Anstey (1799), 4 Ves. 501 ; 5 Ves. 217 ; 4 R. R. 276 539 

Ludford V. Gretton (1576), Plow. 490 84 

Ludlow, May. of, v. Charlton (1840), 9 C. & P. 242 639, 640, 645, 1044 

Luff V. Lord (1864), 34 Bear. 220 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 1248 ; U L. T. 656 136 

Luke, Re (1865), 34 L. J. P. & M. 105 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 397 701 

Lumley v. Gye (1854), 3 E. & B. 114 ; 23 L. J. Q. B. 112 347 

Lund V. Tyngsboro (1851), 9 Cush. 37, 43 377, 379 

Lundy V. Reilly (1858), 30 L. T. 223 768 

The references are to pages, not to paragrofplxs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXXl 

PAdB 

Lunnis v. Bow (1839), 10 A. & E. 606 ; 8 L. J. Q. B. 264 ; 2 P. & D. 

638 910 

Luntly V. (1833), 1 C. & M. 679 867 

Luscombe v. Steer (1867), 37 L. J. Ch. 119 ; 17 L. T. 370 1184 

Lush V. Druse (1830), 4 Wend. 313 802 

Lush V. Russell (1860), 1 L. M. & P. 369 ; 6 Ex. 203 ; 7 Dowl. & L. 228 ; 

19 L. J. Ex. 214 ; 14 Jur. 435 202 

Luehington v. Onslow (1848), 6 Notes of Cases (Eco. & Mar.) 183, 188 . . 142 
Lutsoher, In re. Ex parte WaddeU (1877), 6 Ch. D. 328 ; 26 W. R. 9 ; 36 

L. T. 345 848 

liUtterell v. Revnell (1677), 1 Mod. 284 329, 976 

Lyde v. Barnard (1836), 1 M. & W. 101 ; Tyr. & Gr. 260 ; 5 L. J. Ex. 

117 718, 729 

LyeU V. Kennedy (1884), 27 Oh. D. 1 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 937 ; 50 L. T. 730. . 352, 

424, 601, 1170 
Lyell V. Kennedy (1889), 27 Ch. D. 1 ; 61 L. J. Ch. 937 ; 60 L. T. 730. . 424, 

1049 

Lygon V. Strutt (1795), 2 Anst. 601 ; 3 R. R. 631 430 

Lyle V. EUwood (1872), L. B. 15 Eq. 67 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 80 ; 27 L. T. 671 ; 

21 W. R. 69 1030 

Lyle V. EUwood (1874), 44 L. J. Ch. 164 ; L. R. 19 Eq. 98 ; 23 W. R. 

1 67 149, 373 

Lyle V. Richards (1866), 35 L. J. Q. B. 214 ; L. R. 1 H. L. 222 ; 12 Jur. 

N. S. 947 ; 16 L. T. 1 42, 44 

Lyman ». Lyman (1814), 11 Mass. 317 544 

Lyn V. Miller (1855), 24 Pa. St 392 767 

Lynch «;. Clerke (1696), 3 Salk. 154 480, 1052 

Lynch o. Lynch (1843), 6 Ir. L. R. 142 657, 658, 660, 661 

Lynde v. Judd (1807), 3 Day, 499 1018 

Lyne, Ex parte (1822), 3 Stark. R. N. P. 182 868 

Lynn, Mayor of, r. Denton (1787), 1 T. R. 689 ; 1 R. R. 359 995 

Lynn v. Robertson (1823), 2 Coop. 217 ; 1 L. J. Ch. 88 330 

Lyon's Trusts, In re (1879), 48 L. J. Ch. 246 798 

Lyon V. Home (1868), 37 L. J. Ch. 674 ; L. R. 6 Eq. 655 ; 37 L. J. Ch. 

674 ; 18 L T. 451 ; 16 W. R. 824 136 

Lyon V. Lyman (1831), 9 Conn. 65 1223, 1 228 

Lyon e. Mells (1802), 5 East, 428 ; 1 Smith, 478 ; 7 R. R 726 771 

Lyon V. Reed (1844), 13 M. & W. 303 ; 13 L. J. Ex. 377 ; 8 Jur. 762 . . 637, 656, 

657, 661, 662 
Lyons v. De Pass (1840), 11 A. & E. 326 ; 9 L. J. Q. B. N. S. 51 ; 3 P. & 

D. 177 7 

Lyons ». Mulderry (1832), Hayes, R. 530 92 

M., falsely called H. v. H. (1864), 33 L. J. P. & M. 159 ; 3 S. & T. 517, 

592 167 

Maher ii'. Maher (1867),' 36'l. J.' Ex.' 7o';' 'l.' R.' 2'Ex'. I'-is .' .' .' .' .' .' ." .' .' ." .' .' .' ." 715 
Maberley ». Sheppard (1833), 10 Bing. 101 ; 3 M. & Scott, 436 ; 2 L. J. 

C. P. 181 689, 690 

Maby V. Shepherd (1623), Cro. Jao. 640 543 

Macallum v. Turton (1828), 2 T. & J. 183 961, 962 

Macartney v. Graham (i828), 2 Sim. 285 308 

Maobeath v. Haldimand (1786), 1 T. R. 172 ; 1 R. R. 177 44 

Macbride ». Maobride (1802). 4 Esp. 242 947, 967, 968 

M'Ardle v. Irish Iodine Co. (1864), 15 Ir. 0. L. R. 146 645 

M'Cabe, Re (1873), 42 L. J. P. & M. 79 ; L. R. 3 P. & D. 94 707, 703 

M'Calmont v. Rankin (1852)^ 2 De G. M. & G. 403 ; 22 L. J. Ch. 564. . . . 651 
M'Canoee'. Lond. feN.W. Ry. Co. (1864), 34L. J.Ex. 39; 3H.& 0.343 542 

Maoaulay v. Robertson (1886), 18 L. R. Ir. 483 524 

Macoann v. Macoanu (1862), 3 S. & T. 142 ; 32 L. J. P. & M. 29 601 

MCannon ». Sinclair (1859), 2 E. & E. 53 ; 28 L. J. M. C. 247 ; 6 Jur. 

N. S. 1302 Ill 

M'Carthy v. De Caix (1834), 2 Russ. & My. 614 ; 3 Hagg. Eco. 642, n. . . 1144 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CXXll TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOK 

M'Carthy ». O'Brien (1839), 2 Ir. L. 11.67 713 

M'Clory v. Wright (1860), 10 Ir. C. L. R. 514 634 

McCoUin 1). Gilpin (1881), 6 Q. B. Div. 516 ; 44 L. T. 914 ; 29 W. K. 408 784 

M'Combie v. Auton (1843), 6 M. & Gr. 27 ; 6 Scott, N. R. 923 325 

MacCormaok r. MaeCormack (1876), 1. R. 11 Eq. 130 ; 1 L. R. Ir. 119.. 749, 750 
M'Cormiok v. Garnett (1864), 23 L. J. Ch. 717 ; 5 De G. M. & G. 278 . . 50 
McCorquodale v. Bell (1876), 45 L. J. 0. P. 329 ; 1 0. P. D. 471 . . . .597, 1186 

M'Cullooli V. Dawes (1826), 9 Dowl. & R. 40 492 

M'Donaldw. Longbottom (1860), 1 E. & E. 977; 28 L. J. Q. B. 293; 29 

L. J. Q. B. 256 784 

M'Donald f. Rainor (1811), 8 Johns. 442 1139 

McDonaU v. Alcorn, (1894) 1 I. R. 274, 278 Add. [1103] 

M'Donnell v. Conry (1843), Ir. 0. Rep, 807 603 

MacdonneU v. Evans (1852), 11 C. B. 930 ; 21 L. J. C. P. 141 ; 16 Jur. 103 955, 

956, 968 

M'Donnell v. Murray (1859), 9 Ir. C. L. R. 495 308 

M'Donnell :>. Pope (1852). 9 Hare, 705; 16 Jur. 771 660 

Macdougal v. Young (1826), Ry. & M. 392 ; 1 Vent. 257 357 

McDougall V. Field (1872), I. R. 6 C. L. 185 757 

M'Dowall V. Lyster (1836), 2 M. & W. 52 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 11 225 

Mace V. Cadell (1774), 1 Cowp. 233 539 

M'Elveney v. CouneUan (1864), 17 Ir. C. L. R. 55 618 

M'Bwan v. Campbell (1857), 2 Maoq. 499 ; 1 Paterson, 676 540 

M'Ewan ». Smith (1849), 2 H. L. Cas. 309 ; 13 Jur. 265 691 

M'Fadden v. Murdock (1867), I. R. 1 C. L. 211 '240, 933 

Macfarlan v. Rolt (1872), L. R. 14 Eq. 580 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 649 ; 27 L. T. 

305 ; 20 "W. R. 9*5 602 

Macfarlane, Re (1884), 13 L. R. Ir. 264 704 

Macferson v. Thoytes (1790), Peake, 20 647 

M'Gahey v. Alston (1836), 2 M. & "W. 206 ; 2 Gale, 238 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 29.. 148, 

302, 304, 508 

M'Gonnell v. Murphy (1869), I. R. 3 Eq. 460 638, 639 

M'Gregor v. Bainbrigge (1848), 7 Hare, 164 n. (ri) 160 

Macgregor v. Keily (1849), 3 Ex. 794 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 391 ; 2 D. & L. 635 . . 158 

MGregor v. Topham (1850), 3 H. L. Caa. 155 ; 3 Hare, 488 1215 

M'Gregor Laird, The (1867), 36 L. J. Adm. 10; L. R. 1 A. & E. 307 ; 15 

W. R. 262 1189 

M'Guire's case (1801), 2 East, P. C. 1002 278 

Machell v. Ellis (1845), 1 C. & K. 682 507 

Maohin v. Grindon (1756), 2 Lee, 335 ; 2 Add. 91 1223 

Machu V. Lond. & S. W. Ry. Co. (1848), 2 Ex. 415 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 271 ... . 549 

Macintosh v. Haydon (1826), Ry. & M. 362 1194 

Mclntyre v. Mancius (1819), 16 Johns. 592 961 

Mclver v. Walker (1815), 9 Cranoh, 178 802 

Mackay v. Com. Bank of New Brunswick (1874), 43 L. J. P. C. 31 ; L. R. 

5 P. C. 394 686 

M'Kay V. Rutherford (1848), 6 Moo. P. 0. C. 413 680 

McKeohnie v. Vaughan (1873), L. R. 15 Eq. 289 803 

McKee v. Farnam (1841), 2 Crawf. & D. C. C. 209 1035 

M'Kee v. Nelson (1825), 4 Cowen, 365 930 

McKenire v. Fraser (1803), 9 Ves. 5 433 

MeKenna v. Eager (1875), 9 I. R. C. L. 79 128, 1046 

McKenzie v. British Linen Co. (1881), 6 App. Cas. 82 538 

Mackenzie v. Dunlop (1856), 3 Macq. 26 763 

Mackenzie v. Pooley (1856), 11 Ex. 638 ; 25 L. J. Ex. 124 179 

Mackenzie v. Teo (1841), 2 Curt. 866 60S 

M'Key, Re (1876), I. R. 11 Eq. 220 699 

Mackintosh v. Marshall (1843), 11 M. & W. 126 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 337 47, 157 

Maokley v. Chillingworth (1877), 46 L. J. C. P. 484 ; 2 C. P. D. 273 .... 818 

M'Kone, Re (1841), Ir. Cir. R. 65 866, 869 

Maclae v. Sutherland (1854), 3 E. & B. 1 ; 2 C. L. R. 1320 ; 23 L. J. Q. B. 

229 ; 18 Jur. 942 160, 161 

McLaren v. Home, or Home (1881), 7 Q. B. D. 477 ; 50 L. J. Q. B. 658. . 818 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXXIU 

PAGE 

Maclean v. Dunn (1828), 4 Bing. 722 ; 1 M. & P. 761 7^9 

M'Lean v. Hertzog (1820), 6 Serg. & R. 154 289 

M'Lellan j>. Richardson (1836), 1 Shepl. 82 615, 616 

Macleod v. WaMey (1828), 3 0. & P. 311 243 

McMahon v. Burohell (1846), 2 Ph. 1 27 ; 1 Coop. 475 487 

M'Mahon v. ElUa (1859), 10 Ir. L. R. N. S. 120 962 

M'Mahon v. EUis (1863), 10 Ir. C. L. R. 499, 509 148 

M-Mahon ». Lennard (1858), 6 H. L. C. 970 148 

M'Mahon v. M'Elrojr (1869), I R. 5 Eq. 1 172 

MMahon v. Rawlings (1848), 16 Sim. 429 1151 

M'Manus v. Lanoas. & Torks. Ry. Co. (1859), 2 H. & N. 693 ; 4 H. & N. 

327 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 353 ; 33 L. T. 0. S. 259 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 651 723, 771 

M'Master and Boyle's case (1843), Ir. Cir. R. 768 ; 314 

M'Murdo, Re (1867), 37 L. J. P. & M. 14 ; L. R. IP. &D. 540; 17 L. T. 

393 ; 16 W. E. 283 702 

M'Naghten's case (1843), 10 CI. & F. 200 ; 1 0. & K. 135 ; 8 Scott, N. R. 

595 934, 935 

M'Naughten's trial. Legal Obs., May 27, 1843 164 

M'Neil V. Perohard (1795), 1 Esp. 264 1018 

M'Neil V. PhiUp (1821), 1 McC. (South Car.), 392 544 

MoPherson v. Watt (1877), 3 App. Gas. 254 136 

Maorory v. Scott (1850), 5 Ex. 907 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 90 C72, 677 

M'Vicar, Re (1869), L. R. 1 P. 671 ; 38 L. J. P. 84 ; 20 L. T. 1013 ; 

7 W. R. 832 703 

M'WiUiams v. Nisby (1816), 2 Serg. & R. 515 90 

Maddiaon v. Alderson (1883), 8 App. Cas. 473 ; 52 L. J. Q. B. 737 ; 49 

L. T. 303 ; 31 W. R. 820 ; 47 J. P. 821 539, 6S8 

Maddison v. Nuttall (1829), 6 Bing. 226 ; 3 M. & P. 544 510 

Maddock, Re (1874), L. R. 3 P. 169 ; 43 L. J. P. 169 ; 30 L. T. 696 ; 

22 W. R. 741 700 

Maddox v. Fisher (1 S51), 14 Moo. P. C. C. 103 6 

Maden v. Catanach (1862), 7 H. & N. 360 ; 31 L. J. Ex. 118 ; 6 L. T. 288; 

10 W. R. 112; 7 Jur. N. S. 1107 902, 904 

Magdalen College v. Att.-Gen. (1857), 26 L. J. Ch. 620 ; 6 H. L. Cas. 189 ; 

3 Jur. N. S. e75 74, 125 

Magdalen Hospital, Governors of, v. Kjiott (1877), 47 L. J. Ch. 726; 

8 Ch. D. 709 ; 38 L. T. 624 ; 26 W. R. 616 301 

Magee v. Atkinson (1837), 2 M. & W. 440 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 115 758 

Magee v. Mark (1860), 11 Ir. 0. L. R. 449 1IJ5, 634 

Magennis v. MacCuUough (undated), Gilh. (Eq. R ) 236 659 

Maghee v. CNeU (1841), 7 M. & "W. 531 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 326 717 

Magnays;. Burt (1843), Dav. &M. 652; 5 Q. B. 381 ; 7 Jur. 1116 866,872, 

873 

Magnay v. Fisher (1843), 5 M. & Gr. 778 ; 6 Scott, N. R. 588 543 

Magnay ». Knight (1840), 2 Scott, N. R. 64 ; 1 M. & Gr. 944 ; 1 Drink. 

13 ; 4 Jur. 1088 287 

Magnet, The (The Fanny Carvill) (1875), 44 L. J. Adm. 34 ; 32 L. T. 

646 ; 24 W. R. 62 ; 6 Asp M. C. 569 177 

Magoun v. N. Engl. Ins. Co. (1840), 1 Story, R. 157 1142, 1148 

Magrath v. Browne (1841), Arm. M. & 0. 133 954 

Magrath v. Hardy (1838), 4 Bing. N. C. 782 ; 6 Scott, 627 ; 6 Dowl. P. C. 

749 ; 1 Am. 362 ; 2 Jur. 594 89, 1101 

Mahalen v. DubHu Distilleiy Co. (1877), 11 Ir. R. C. L. 83 672 

Mahalm v. McOuUagh, (1891) 27 L. R. Ir. 431 631 

Maharajah Pertab Narain Singh v. Maharanee Subhao Kootr (1877), L. R. 

4 Ind. App. 228 703 

Mahon'a Trust, Re (1852), 9 Hare, 459 ; 22 L. J. Ch. 75 1026 

Mahon v. Mahon (1840), 2 Ir. Eq. R. 440 867 

Mahoney v. Keknle (1854), 14 C. B. 390 ; 23 L. J. C. P. 54 ; 18 Jur. 

313 161 

Mahony*. "Widows' Life Ass. Fund (1871), L. R. 6 C. P. 252; 40 L. J. 

C. P. 203 ; 24 L. T. 548 ; 19 W. R. 722 1186 

Mahood v. Mahood (1874), I. R. 8 Eq. 359 307 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CXXiy TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOB 

Maid of Auckland, The (1848), 6 Notes of Gas. (Eoc. & Mar.), 2*40 1122 

Maingay v. Gahan (1793), Eidg. L. & S. 1, 79 ; 1 Kldg. P. C. 43, 44, n. . 1103 
Mair's Estate, Ee (1873), 42 L. J. Ch. 882 ; 28 L. T. 760 ; 21 W. R. 749. . 1208 

Major V. WilUams (1843). 3 Curt. 432 709 

Malcolm v. Ray (1819), 3 Moore, C. P. 222 831 

Malcolm v. Scott (1843, should be 1850), 5 Ex. 601 487 

Malcolmson v. Morton (1847), 11 Ir. L. R. 230 766 

Maloomson v. Baldock {tee Auckland, Earl of} . 

Maloomson v. Clayton (186U), 13 Moo. P. C. C. 198 185 

Maloomson v. O'Dea (1862), 10 H. of L. Cas. 593, 614, 616 ; 9 L T. 93 ; 

12W. E. 178; y Jur. IS.S. 1135 87, 111, 124, 432 

Maiden ii. Great North. Ry. Co. (1874), L. R. 9 Ex. 300 1186 

Male V. Roberts (1800), 3 Ksp. 163 ; 6 R. E. 823 7 

•MallaUeu v. Hodgson (1852), 16 Q. B. 689 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 339 ; 15 Jur. 

817 91 

MaUan v. May (1844), 13 M. & W. 517 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 48 741 

Mallan v. Eadcliff (1864), 17 C. B. N. S. 588 ; 11 L. T. 381 ; 13 W. E. 

139 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 1132 777 

M>illett V. Bateman (1865), L. E. 1 C. P. 163; 35 L. J. C. P. 40 ; 13 L. T. 

410 ; 14 W. R. 225 ; 1 H. & E. 109 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 122 ; 16 C. B. N. S. 

630 ; 33 L. J. C. P. 243 676 

MalKsou, Re (1832), 1 Lew. C. C. 132 824 

Malone v. O'Connor (1859), Drury, temp. Napier, 644 79 

Malone v. Spillessy (1847), Ir. Cir. E. 504 946 

Maloney v. Bartley (1812), 3 Camp. 210 960, 961 

Malpas V. Clements (1850), 19 L. J. Q. B. 436 146 

Malpas V. London & South West. Ey. Co. (1866), L. E. 1 C. P. 336 ; 

35 L. J. C. P. 166 ; 13 L. T. 710 ; 14 W. E. 391 ; 1 H. & R. 227 ; 12 

Jur. N. S. 271 745 

Maltby J). Christie (1795), 1 Esp. 340 618 

Malton 0. Nesbit (1824), 1 C. & P. 70 935 

Man V. Eicketts (1845), 2 Coop. (C. P.) 21 ; 14 L. J. Ch. 255 16, 129 

Manby v. Curtis (1815), 1 Price, 225 171, 430, 443 

Manby v. Scott (1660), 2 Smith's L. C. 466 ; 1 Lev. 4 166, 167 

Manchester, Bank of, Ex parte, Ee Jackson (1871), 40 L. J. Bank. 57 : 

L. E. 12 Eq. 354 685 

Manchester Bonded "Warehouse Co. v. Carr (1880), 5 C. P. D 507 ; 49 

L. J. C. P. 809 ; 43 L. T. 476 ; 29 W. E. 354 ; 45 J. P. 7 774 

Manchester, May. of, ». Williams, (18911 1 Q. B. 94 ; 60 L. J. Q. B. 23 ; 

63 L. T. 805 ; 39 W. E. 302 ; 54 J. P. 712 643 

Mandeville v. Welch (1820), 1 Wheat. 233 488 

Mangles v. Dixon (1849), 1 Mac. & G. 446 ; 1 H. & T. 550 ; 19 L. J. Ch. 

240 538 

Manley v. Boycot (1853), 2 E. & B. 46 ; 22 L. J. Q. B. 265 ; 17 Jur. 1118. 758 

Manley v. Shaw (1840), Car. & M. 361 899 

Mann, Ee (1859), 28 L. J. P. & M. 19 69J 

Mann v. Lang (1835), 3 A. & E. 702 ; 5 N. & M. 202 ; 1 H. & W. 441 . . 553 

Mann v. Nunn (1874), 43 L. J. C. P. 241 ; 30 L. T. 526 683, 754 

Mann ». Owen (1829), 9 B. & C. 595 ; 4 M. & R. 449 1133 

Manners v. Postan (1803), 4 Esp. 239 ; 3 Bos. & P. 343 1209 

Manning v. Cox (1823), 7 Moore, C. P. 617 487 

Manning v. East. Cos. Ey. Co. (1843), 12 M. & W. 237 ; 3 Eailw. Cas. 

637 ; 13 L. J. Ex. 265 1033, 1039 

Mansel v. Clanricarde (1885), 54 L. J. Ch. 982 ; 53 L. T. 496 913 

ManseU v. Clements (1874). L. E. 9 C. P. 139 9:i0 

Manser v. Back (1848), 6 Hare, 443 750 

Manser v. Dix (185.5), 1 K. & J. 451 ; 24 L. J. Ch 497 602 

Marathon, The (1879), 4S L. J. Adm. 17 ; 40 L. T. 163 178 

Marbury v. Madison (1803), 1 Cranoh, 144 61 8 

Marchmont Peer. (1840), Pari. Min. 346, 353 423, 1179 

Mare v. Charles (1856), 5 E. & B. 978 ; 25 L. J. Q. B. 119 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 

234 787 

Margareson v. Saxton (1835), 1 T. & C. Ex. 629 487 

The references are to pages, not to paiagraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXXV 

PAGE 

Maria das Dorias, or Dores, The (1863), 32 L. J. P. & M 163 ; Erown & 

L. 27; 7L. T. 838; 11 W. R. 500 1172 

Marianslsi v. Cairns (1851-2), 1 Macq. 212 ; 1 Paterson, 416 480 

Marine Investmeut Co. v. Haviside (1872), L. R. 5 H. L. 624; 42 L. J. 

Ch. 173 133 

Markham -;. Gonaston (1688), Cro. Eliz. 626 1200, 1205 

Markham v. Standford ^1863), 14 C. B. N. S. 380 ; 8 L. T. 277 649 

Mark8«).Beyfus(1890), 25Q.B. D. 494; 59 L.J. Q.B.479; 38W.R.705.. 613 

Marks v. Lahee (1837), 3 Bing. N. C. 419 ; 4 Scott, 137 435, 440 

Marmyon Peer. (1818), Pari. Min. Ill 423 

Marriage v. Lawrence (1819), 3 B. & Aid. 412 10.50, 1175 

Marriot ». Marriot (1725-6), 1 Str. 671 1105, 1133 

Marsden v. Goode (1845), 2 C. & Kir. 133 48 

Marsdon v. Lauo. & York. Ry. Co. (1881), 7 Q. B. D. 641 ; 50 L. J. Q. B. 

318; 44 L. T. 239; 29 W. R. 580 41 

Marsden v. Overbury (1856), 18 C. B. 34 ; 25 L. J. C. P. 200 838 

Marsh V. Collnett (1798), 2 Esp. 666 ; 5 R. R. 763 86, 1053, 1054, 1173 

Marsh v. Keith (1860), 30 L. J. Ch. 127 ; 1 Dr. & Sm. 342 605 

Marsh V. Loader (1863), 14 C. B. N. S. 535 ; 2 New R. 280 ; 11 W. R. 784. 99 
Marsh v. Marsh (1858, should be 1860), 1 S. & T. 528 ; 30 L. J. P. & M. 

77 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 380 141, 709 

Marshal v. Crutwell (1875), L. R. 20 Eq. 328 ; 44 L. J. Ch. 504 667 

Marshall v. Berridge (1882), 51 L. J. Ch. 329 ; 19 Ch. D. 223 ; 45 L. T. 

599 ; 30 W. R. 94 670 

MarshaU v. Cliff (1815), 4 Camp. 133 606 

Marshall v. Gougler (1823), 10 Serg. & R. 164 1199 

Marshall v. Green (1875), 1 C. P. D. 35 ; 45 L. J. C. P. 153. .685, 686, 687, 690 
MarshaU v. Lamb (1843), 5 Q. B. 113 ; D. & M. 315 ; 13 L. J. Q. B. 75 ; 

7 Jur. 850 147, 148 

MarshaU v. Lynn (1840), M. & W. 116 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 126 762 

MarshaU v. Smith (1866), 34 L. J. Ch. 189 ; 11 L. T. 443 ; 13 W. R. 198 ; 

10 Jur. N. S. 1174 74 

MarshaU v. Taylor, (1895) 1 Ch. 641 ; 64 L. J. Ch. 416 Add. [113] 

MarshaU v. The UUeswater St. Na. Co. (1863), 32 L. J. Q. B. 139 ; 3 B. 

& S. 732 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 988 ; 8 L. T. 416 ; 11 W. R. 489 Ill 

MarshaU v. The York, Newcastle, & Berwick Ry. Co. (1851), 11 C. B. 398 832 

Marston v. Dean (1836), 7 C. & P. 13 2S7 

Marston v. Downes (1834), 1 A. & E. 31 ; 4 N. & M. 861 ; 6 C. & P. 381 . . 320, 

321, 597, 969 

Martin's case (1830), 1 Lew. C. C. 104 246 

Martin, Re (1883), 13 L. R. Ir. 312 321 

Martin v. Andrews (1856), 26 L. J. Q. B. 39 ; 7 B. & B. 1 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 

1121 820 

Martin v. Gale (1867), 4 Ch. D. 428 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 84 ; 36 L. T. 357 ; 25 

"W. R. 406 100 

Martin v. Geoghegan (1850), 13 Ir. L. R. 403 710 

Martin v. Kennedy (1800), 2 Bos. & P. 71 1122 

Martin v. Nioolls (1830), 3 Sim. 458 1154 

Martin v. Podger (1770), 5 Burr. 2631 481 

Martin v. Smith (1874), 43 L. J. Ex. 42 ; L. R. 9 Ex. 50 650, 654 

Martin ». Thornton (1796), 4 Esp. 181 612 

Martindale v. Booth (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 498 ; 1 Sm. L. C. 16 136 

Martindale v.- Falkner (1846), 2 C. B. 719, 720; 15 L. J. C. P. 91 ; 3 Dowl. 

& L. P. C. 600 79 

Marfcyn v. Williams (1857), 26 L. J. Ex. 117 ; 1 H. & N. 817 192 

Marvin v. Wallace (1856), 25 L. J. Q. B. 369 ; 6 E. & B. 726 690 

Mary, The (1878), 48 L. J. P. D. & A. 66 ; 5 P. D. 14 ; 41 L. T. 361 ; 

28W. R. 95 178 

Mary, The, or Alexandra (1868), 38 L. J. Adm. 29 ; L. R. 2 Adm. & Eoo. 

319 ; 18 L. T. 891 964, 1189 

Mary, The (1815), 9 Cranch, 126 1150 

Marzetti v. Smith (1883), 49 L. T. 680 ; 6 Asp. M. C. 166 ; 1 C. & E. 6 . . 769 
Mash V. Densham (1834), 1 M. & Rob. 442 190 

Vol. I. end) with page 63fi. 



CXXVl TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAas 

Mason and Barry v. Comptoir d'Esoompte (1890), 38 W. R. 685 343 

Maaon v. Bradley (1843), 11 M. & W. 6i)0 ; 1 Dowl. & L. 380 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 

426 ; 7 Jur. 496 1194 

Mason v. Farnell (1844), 12 M. & W. 674 ; 1 Dowl. &L. 676 ; 13 L. J. Ex. 

142 47 

Mason 1). Kiddle (1839), 6 M. & W. 513 ; 8 Dowl. 207 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 37 . . 732 

Mason ». Mason (1816), 1 Meriv. 308 174 

Mason v. Skurray a78u), Park, Ins. 245 763 

Mason v. "Wood (1875), 45 L. J. 0. P. 76 ; 1 C. P. D. 63 ; 33 L. T. 671 ; 

24 "W. R. 46 1088 

Masper and Wife v. Brown (1875), 45 L. J. C. P. 203 ; 1 C. P. D. 97 ; 34 

L. T. 254 ; 24 W. R. 369 1130 

Massey v. Allen (1879), 13 Ch. D. 658 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 76 ; 41 L. T. 788 ; 

28 W. R. 212 435, 456, 846 

Massey v. Johnson (1847), 1 Ex. 255 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 182 682 

Master v. Miller (1791), 4 T. R. 330 ; 5 T. R. 367 ; 2 H. Bl. 140 ; 1 Anstr. 

225; 2R. R. 399 1193, 1194, 1200, 1201 

Master Pilots & Seamen of Newcastle v. Bradley (1851), 2 B. & B. 428, n. ; 

23 1. J. Q. B. 35 791 

Masters v. Barrets (1849), 2 C. & K. 715 262 

Masters v. Masters (1718), 1 P. Wms. 425 762 

Misters v. PoUie (1620), 2 Rolle R. 141 114 

Mather v. Lord Maidstone (1866), 26 L. J. C. P. 58 ; 1 C. B. N. S. 273 ; 

3 Jnr. N. S. 112 262 

Mather v. Trinity Chnrch (1877), 3 Serg. & R. 509 123 

Mathews v. Mathews (1867), L. R. 4 Eq. 278 ; 1 5 W. R. 761 804 

Mathews». Ovey (1884), 13 Q. B. D. 403; 53 L.J. Q. B.439; 50L.T.776.. 1232 

Mathias, Re (1863), 32 L. J. P. & M. 115 ; 3 S. & T. 100 701 

Matson v. Booth (1816), 6 M. & Sel. 223 1203 

Matson v. Wharam (1787), 2 T. R. 80 ; 1 R. R. 429 678 

Matthew!). Osborne (1865), I3C.B. 919; 22 L. J. 0. P. 241; 17 Jur. 696. .89, 1113 

Matthews ». Matthews (1755), 2 Ves. sen. 636 806 

Matthews v. Port (1687), Comb. 63 1167 

Matthews v. Whittle (1880), 13 Ch. D. 811 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 359 ; 43 L. T. 

114 ; 28 W. R. 822 636 

Matthey v. Wiseman (1865), 18 C. B, N. S. 657 ; 34 L. J. C. P. 216 ; 11 

Jur. N. S. 603 ; 12 L. T. 846 ; 13 W. R. 914 1116 

Matts V. Hawkins (1813), 5 Taun. 20 ; 14 R. R. 695 113 

Maubourquet v. Wyse (1867), I. R. 1 C. L. 471 1146, 1148 

Maude v. Baildon Local Board (1883), 10 Q. B. D. 394 ; 48 L. T. 874 ; 47 

J. P. 644 48 

Maugham v. Hubbard (1828), 8 B. & C. 14 ; 2 M. & R. 6 926, 927 

Maund V. Monmouth Can. Co. (184 2), C. & Marsh. 606 ; 2 Dowl. N. S. 113 ; 

4 M. & G. 452 ; 5 Scott, N. R. 457 ; 3 Railw. Cas. V,9 ; 6 Jur. 932 227 

MaunseU v. Ainsworth (1840), 8 Dowl. 869 ; 1 H. & W. 5 815 

Maunsell v. Hedger (1851), 2 Ir. C. L. R. 88 712 

MaunseU w. White (1864), 4 H. L. Cas. 1039 639, 679 

Mavor v. Payne (1825), 3 Bing. 285 ; 11 Moore, C. P. 2 682 

Mawby v. Barber (1826), 2 St. Ev. 641, 642 255 

Mawson v. Hartsink (1802), 4 Esp. 103 ; 6 R. R. 841 972, 974 

Maxwells. PameU fl866-7), L R. 1 C. L. 234 780 

May, Re (1868), 37 L. J. P. & M. 68 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 575 709 

May V. Brown (1824), 3 B. & C. 113 ; 4 D. & R. 670 245, 246 

May V. Footner (1855), 5 E. & B. 506 ; 26 L. J. Q. B. 32 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 

1019 188 

May V. Gwynne (1821), 4 B. & Aid. 301 996 

May V. Selby (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 142; 4 Scott, N. R. 727; 1 D. N. S. 702; 

6 Jur. 52; 11 L. J. 0. P. 223 818 

May V. Taylor (1843), 6 M. & Gr. 266 ; 6 Scott, N. R. 974 ; 12 L. J. C. P. 

314 ; 7 Jur. 615 496, 497 

Mayfield v. Robinson (1845), 7 Q. B. 486 ; 9 Jur. 826 637 

Mayfield i;. Wadsley (1824), 3 B. & C. 366 ; 6 D. & R. 224 687 

Mayhew v. Nelson (1833), 6 C. & P. 68 378 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXXVll 

PAGE 

Mayor p. Jolmson (1813), 3 Camp. 324 3u7 

Mead v. Daubigny (1792), Pea. 125 244 

Meade v. Smith (1844), 16 Conn. 346 617 

Meagoe v. Simmons (1827), 3 C. & P. 75 925 

MearsD. Ld. Stourton (1711), IP. Wma. 146 900 

Meath, Bp. of v. Ld. Belfield (1748), 7 WiU. 215 ; 2 Salk. 512 398 

Meath, Bp. of v. M. of Winchester (1836), 3 Bing. N. 0. 198 ; 3 So. 

561 26, 87, 429, 431, 510, 602 

Mechanics' Bk. of Alexandria ». Bk. of Columbia (1820), 5 Wheat. 336 . . 388 
Meohelen v. Wallace (1837), 7 A. & E. 49 ; 6 L. J. K. B. 217 ; 2 N. & P. 

•224 678, 682 

Meoredy v. Taylor (1873), I. R. 7 0. L. 256 166 

Meddowcroft v. Huguenin (1844), 4 Moo. P. C. C. 386 1132 

Medlycott v. Assheton (1824), 2 Add. 229 143 

Mee V. Reid (1791), Pea. B. 23 ; 3 R. R. 648 905 

Meekins v. Smith (1791), 1 H. Bl. 637 ' 865, 866 

Megevand, Re, Ex parte Delhasse (1867), 37 L. T. 440 ; 26 W. R. 20 ; 7 

Ch. D. 611 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 65 ; 38 L. T. 106 ; 26 W. R. 338 159 

Megson v. Hindle (1880), 15 Ch. D. 198 ; 43 L. T. 551 ; 28 W. R. 866 . . 145 

Melon V. Andrews (1829), M. & M. 3:j6 523, 528, 687 

Melhnish v. Collier (1850), 15 Q. B. 878 ; 19 L. J. Q. B. 493 ; 14 Jur. 621 . . 242, 939 

MeUish v. Rawdon (1832), 9 Bing. 416 ; 2 M. & Scott, 570 38 

Mellor V. Sidebottom (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 398 ; 5 Ch. D. 342 ; 37 L. T. 7 ; 

25 W. R. 410 534 

Mellow V. May (1601), Moo. (F.) 636 657 

Melville's, Ld., case (1806), 29 How. St. Tr. 707 8, 14, 108, 472, 587, 969 

Melvin v. Whiting (1828), 7 Pick. 79 327 

Mercant. Credit Associat., Re, Clement's case (1868), 37 L. J. Ch. 295 ; 13 

L. R. Eq. 179, n. 1 845 

Mercer v. Cheese (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 8U4 ; 6 Scott, N. R. 664 ; 2 Dowl. N. 

S. 619 ; 12 L. J. C. P. 56 168 

Mercer v. Sparks (1586), Owen, 51 ; Noy, 35 110 

Mercer v. Whall (1845), 5 Q. B. 462 ; 14 L. J. Q. B. 267 ; 9 Jur. 676. .270, 273 

Mercer v. Wise (1800), 3 Esp. 219 542 

Mercer -i). Woodgate (1870), 10 B. & S. 833 ; 39 L. J. M. C. 21 ; L. R. 5 

Q. B. 26 ; 21 L. T. 458 ; 18 W. R. 116 124 

Merchant Prince, The, (1892) P. 9, 179 ; 67 L. T. 261 260 

Merchants' Co., Re (1867), L. R. 4 Eq. 453 845 

Meredith v. Eootner (1843), 11 M. & W. 202 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 183 503, 505 

Meredith ». Meigh (1853), 2 E. & B. 364 ; 22 L. J. Q. B. 401 692 

Merle v. More (1826), Ry. & M. 390 603 

Merrick v. Wakley (1838), 8 A. & E. 170 ; 3 N. & P. 284 ; 1 W. W. & H. 

268; 2 Jar. 838 1048 

Merrill v. Morton (1881), 60 L. J. Ch. 249 ; 17 Ch. D. 382 ; 43 L. T. 750 ; 

29 W. R. 394 741 

Merritt, Re (1868), 1 S. & T. 112 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 1192 705 

Merry e. Nickalls (1876), L. R. 7 Ch. 733 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 767 ; 26 L. T. 

496 ; 20 W. R. 531 168 

Messia v. Ld. Massareene (1791), 4 T. R. 493 1165 

Messina v. Petrooooohino (1872), L. R. 4 P. C. 144 ; 8 Moo. P. C. C. N. S. 

375 1147 

Meteor, The (1875), L R. 9 Eq. 567 178 

Metropol. Ry. Co. i>. Defries (1877), 2 Q. B. D. 189, 387 ; 36 L. T. 150, 

494 ; 25 W. R. 271, 841 535 

Metropol. Ry. Co. ». Jackson (1877), 3 App. Cas. 193 ; 47 L. J. C. P. 303 ; 

37 L. T. 679 ; 26 W. R. 175 23, 28, 38 

Mettersf. Brown (1862), 32 L. J. Ex. 138; 1 H. & C. 686 92, 116, 495 

Mews V. Carr (1856), 1 H. & N. 484 ; 26 L J. Ex. 29 730 

Mexican & S. American Co., Re, Ex parte Aston (1859), 28 L. J. Ch. 634 ; 

4 De G. & J. 220 ; 27 Beav. 474 964 

Meyer v. Dresser (1864), 16 0. B. N. S. 646 ; 33 L. J. C. P. 289 ; 10 L. T. 

612 ; 12 W. R. 983 85 

Meyer v. Montriou (1846), 9 Beav. 521 496 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CXXVlll TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOB 

Meyer v. Ealli (1876), 1 C. P. D. 358 ; 45 L. J. C. P. 741 ; 24 W. E. 963. . 1147 

Meyer v. Sefton (1817), 2 Stark. R. 274 ; 19 R. E. 720 323 

Meyerhofe v. Froehlioh (1878), 3 C. P. D. 333 ; 4 0. P. D. 63 ; 48 L. J. 0. 

P. 43 : 39 L. T. 620 ; 27 W. E. 258 712 

Meynell's case (1834), 2 Lew. C. C. 122 666 

Meyrick v. James (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 579 ; 324, 920 

Mpyrick v. Woods (1842), 0. & Marsh. 452 314 

Michael v. Seockwith (1587), Cro. Eliz. 120 1200 

Michael v. Tredwin (1856), 17 C. B. 551 ; 26 L. J. C. P. 83 771 

Michell V. Rabhetts (1810), cited 3 Taun. 91 430 

Michell V. "WilHams (1843), 11 M. & W. 205 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 193 30, 31 

Middleditoh v. Ellis (1848), 2 Ex. 623 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 365 764 

Middlehiirst v. Johnson (1861), 30 L. J. P. & M. 14 140 

Middlesex Sheriffs, case of (18)0), 11 A. & E. 273 4 

Middleton's case (1603), 5 Go. Eep. 21 92 

Middletou, Re (1865), 34 L. J. P. & M. 16 ; 3 S. & T. 583 ; 10 Jur. N. 8. 

1109 708 

Middleton v. Earned (1849), 4 Ex. 241 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 433 106, 977 

Middleton v. Croft (1736), Str. 1056 79 

Middleton v. Mass (1819), 2 Nott. &• M;C. 65 429 

Middleton v. Melton (1829), 10 B. & C 322 ; 5 M. & R. 264. .279, 437,441, 608 
Middleton v. Pollock, Ex parte WetheraU (1876), 4 Ch. D. 49 : 46 L. J. Ch. 

39 ; 35 L. T. 608 ; 26 W. R. 94 539 

Midland Ry. Co. v. Hunchwood Brick and Tile Co. (1882), 20 Ch. D. 552 ; 

51 L. J. Ch. 778 ; 46 L. T. 301 ; 30 W. E. 640 60 

Midland Ey. Co. v. "Withington Local Board (1883), 11 Q. B. D. 788; 52 

L. J. Q. B. 689 ; 49 L. T. 489 ; 47 J. P. 789 226 

Mighell V. Sultan of Johore, (1893) 9 R. 447 ; (1894) 1 Q. B. 149 ; 63 L. J. 

Q. B. 593 ; 70 L. T. 64 ; 58 J. P. 244 14 

Migottif. Cclville (1879), 4 C. P. D. 233; 48 L. J. C. P. 695; 40 L. T. 

747 ; 27 W. E. 744 ; 14 Cox, C. C. 305 16 

Milan, The (1861), Lush. 388 ; 31 L. J. Adm. 106 ; 6 L. T. 590 1122 

Mildrone's case (1786), 1 Lea. C. C. 412 905 

Miles V. Bough (1842), 3 Q. B. 845; 3 Eailw. Cas. 668; 3 G. .& D. 119 ; 

12 L. J. Q B. 74 294, 1177 

Miles V. Dawson (1796), 1 Esp, 405 ; 2 Peake, 54 969 

Miles V. M'Cullough (ISnS), 1 Binn. 77 873 

MUes V. O'Hara (1811), 4 Biun. 108 353, 354 

Millar v. Heinrick (1815), 4 Camp. 115 ,.. . . 936 

Millard v. Bailey (1866), L. R. 1 Eq. 378 ; 36 L. J. Ch. 312 ; 13 L. T. 751 ; 

14 W. R. 386 789 

Miller's case (1772-3), 3 "Wilson, 427 ; 2 W. Bl. 886 930 

Miller's case (1817), Macq. Prao. H. L. 620 503 

MiUer v. Cook (1870), L. E. 10 Eq. 641 ; 40 L. J. Ch. 11 ; 18 W. E. I(i61; 

22L. J. Ch. 740 137 

Millers. Covert (1828), 1 Wend. 487 1U4 

Miller v. Huddlestone (1851), 3 Mac. & G. 513, 523, 524 ; 21 L. J. Ch 1 ; 

15 Jur. 1043 144 

Miller V. Irvine (1834), 1 Dev. & B. 103 669 

Miller v. James (1872), L. E. 3 P. & D. 4 ; 42 L. J. P. & M. 21 ; 27 L. T. 

862 ; 21 W. E. 272 1151 

Miller v. Lawton (186+), 2 New E. 430 ; 15 C. B N. S. 834 388 

Miller v. Salomons (1852), 7 Ex. 534 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 161 905 

MiUer v. Stevens (1868), 100 Mass. 518 763 

Miller v. Tetherington (1861), 6 H. & N. 278 ; 30 L. J. Ex. 217 ; 7 H. & 

N. 954; 3L. T. 893; 9 W. E. 437 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 214 ; 31 L. J. Ex. 

363 ; 10 W. E. 356 764, 766 

Miller v. Travers (1832), 8 Bing. 250 744, 760, 761, 801, 802 

Miller D. Wheatley (1890), 28 L. R. Ir. 144 305, 431, 460, 1210 

Milligan, Re (184m), 2 Roberts. 108 702 

Millington v. Loring (1880), 6 Q. B. D. 190 ; 50 L. J. Q. B. 214 ; 43 L. T. 

657 ; 29 W. E. 207 ; 45 J. P. 268 220 

Millman v. Tucker (1803), Pea. Add. Cas. 222 967, 970 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXXIX 

PAQE 

Millner's Estate, Re (1872), L. R. 14 Eq. 245 ; 42 L. J. Oh. 44 ; 26 L. T. 

825 ; 20 "W . R. 823 101 

Mills V. Barber (1836), 1 M. & W. 427 ; 5 Dowl. P. 0. 77 ; 2 Gale, 6 . .258, 261 

Mills V. Dennis (1818), 3 Johns. 367 496 

Mills V. Eowkes (1839), 6 Bing. N. C. 455 ; 7 Soott, 444 ; 8 L. J. C. P. 

276 715, 716 

Mills V. Mayor of Colchester (1867), L. R. 2 C. P. 476 ; 36 L. J. C. P. 216; 

16 L. T. 626 ; 15 W. R. 955 123, 124, 1092 

Mills ». Mills (1861), 30 L. J. P. & M. 183 ; 2 S. & T. 310 ; 4 L. T. 479. . 348 

Mills V. Milward (1890), 15 P. D. 20 ; 69 L. J. P. 23 ; 61 L. T. 651 703 

Mills V. Oddy (1834), 6 C. & P. 728 271, 320, 599 

MUls V. Scott (1873), 42 L. J. Q. B. 234 ; D. R. 8 Q. B. 496 ; 29 h. T. 96 ; 

21 "W. R. 915 191, 195 

Milne V. Leisler (1862), 31 L. J. Ex. 257 ; 7 H. & N. 786 ; 5 L. T. 802 ; 10 

W. R. 250 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 121 378 

Milroy v. Lord (1862), 4 De G. F. & J. 264 ; 31 L. J. Oh. 798 639 

Milsoni-. Day (1829), 3 M. & P. 333 817 

Milward v. Eorbes (1803), 4 Esp. 171 517 

Milward v. Hibbert (1842), 3 Q. B. 135 ; U L. J. Q. B. 137 ; 2 G. & D. 142 765 

Milward v. Temple (1808), 1 Camp. 375 

Mima Queen v. Hepburn (1813), 7 Cranch, 290 368, 506 

Minet ». Morgan (1873), L. R. 8 Oh. App. 361 ; 42 L. J. Oh. 627 ; 28 L. T. 

N. S. 573; 21 W. R. 467 321, 601, 602 

Minna, The (1868), L. R. 2 A. & E. 97 178 

Minor v. TUlotson (1833), 7 Pet. 100 277 

Minshall v. Lloyd (1837), 2 M. & W. 450 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 115 304 

Mints V. Bethill (1601), Oro. EUz. 749 323 

Minty, Re (1850), 7 Notes of Oases (Eoo. & Mar.) 374 698 

Mires v. Solebay (1678), 2 Mod. 244, 245 29 

Mitchell V. OrassweUer (1853), 13 C. B. 237 ; 22 L. J. C. P. 100 ; 17 Jur. 

716 193 

MitcheU v. Darley Main OoU. Co. (1886), 11 App. Oas. 127 ; 65 L. J. Q. B. 

629 ; 54 L. T. 882 ; 51 J. P. 148 114 

Mitchell V. Homfray (1881), 50 L. J. Q. B. 460 ; 8 Q. B. D. 687 ; 45 L. T. 

694 ; 29 W. R. 668 136 

Mitchell V. Jenkins (1833), 5 B. & Ad. 594—596 ; 2 N. & M. 301 30, 39, 110 

Mitchell V. Lapage (1816), Holt, N. P. R. 253 ; 17 R. P.. C33 299 

MitcheU V. Thomas (1847), 6 Moo. P. 0. 0. 137 140, 141 

Mitcheaon v. Oliver (1865), 5 E. & B. 419 ; 25 L. J. Q. B. 39 ; 1 Jur. 

N. S. 900 17d 

Mobile, The (1866), Swa. Adm. 69, 127 178 

Mody V. Gregson (1868), 38 L. J. Ex. 12 ; Jj. R. 4 Ex. 49 ; 19 L. T. 458 ; 

17 W. R. 176 776 

Moffatt V. Bateman (1869), L. R. 3 P. C. 116 ; 22 L. T. 140 ; 6 Moore, 

P. 0. 0. N. S. 369 163 

Mohesh Lai v. Mohunt Bawan Das (1883), L. R. 10 Ind. App. 62, 70, 71.. 153 

Moises V. Thornton (1799), 8 T. R. 307 ; 3 Esp. 4 1214 

MoUett V. Brayne (1809), 2 Oamp. 103 ; 11 R. R. 676 656, 660 

Mollett V. Wackerbath (1847), 5 C. B. 181 ; 17 L. J. 0. P. 47 ; 11 Jur. 

1066 1193, 1195 

MoUwo, March & Co. v. Ct. of "Wards (1872), L. R. 4 P. 0. 419, 435 159 

Molton V. Camroux (1849), 2 Ex. 487 ; 4 Ex. 17 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 366 ; 18 

L. J. Ex. 68 ; 12 Jur. 800 542 

Molton V. Harris (1797), 2 Esp. 549 296 

Monaghau v. Cox (1892), 31 Am. St. R. 556 372 

Mouoriefi v. Reade (1848), 2 C. & K. 705 192 

Mondel v. Steele (1841), 8 M. & "W. 300 ; 9 Dowl. 812 ; 6 Jur. 611 ; 10 

L. J. Ex. 314 1122 

Money v. Jorden (1852), 16 Beav. 372 ; 20 L. J. Ch. 174 539 

Monktonii. Att.-Gen. (1831), 2 Russ. & My. 161.. 408, 409, 410, 413, 416, 416, 

418, 421, 423, 424 

Monroe, Bank of, ». Field (1842), 2 HiU, R. 445 388 

Monroe v. Twistleton (1802), Pea. Add. Oas. 221 591 

Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



CXXX TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAOB 

Montacute v. Maxwell (1720), 1 P. Wms. 619 679, 680 

Montague v. Harrison (1857), 3 C. B. N. S. 292 ; 27 L. J. C. P. 24 ; i 

Jur. N. S. 29 869 

Montag-ue, Ld., o. Dudman (1751), 2 Ves. sen. 397 997 

Montague v. Montague (1852), 15 Beav. 565 805 

Montague v. Perkins (1853), 22 L. J. C. P. 187 ; 17 Jur. 677 38, 1205 

Montefior* v. Guedalla (1860), 29 L. J. Oh. 65 ; 1 De Gr. F. & J. 93 .... 806 

Montefiori v. Monteaori (1762), 1 "W. Bl. 363 539 

Montgomery v. Middletou (1862), 13 Ir. 0. L. R. 173 43 

Montreal, Bank of, v. Munster Bank (1876), I. E- 11 0. L. 47 44 

Montrose, Peer. (1853), 1 Macq. 401 180, 792 

Moodie d. Bannister (1859), 4 Drew. 432 ; 28 L. J. Ch. 881 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 

402 722 

Moody V. Kowell (1835), 17 Pick. 490 922, 945, 1220, 1223, 1228 

Moody V. Surridge (1798), Park, Ins. 245 763 

Moons V. De Bernales (1856), 1 Russ. 301 1104 

Moor ». (1813), 1 M. & Sel. 284 255 

Moore v. Booth (1797), 3 Ves. 350 ' 869 

Moore v. Campbell (1854), 10 Ex. 323 ; 23 L. J. Ex. 310 298, 752 

Moore v. Culverhouse (1860), 27 Beav. 639 ; 29 L. J. Ch. 419 ; 6 Jur. 

N. S. 1 15 738 

Moore v. Garwood (1849), 4 Ex. 681 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 15 44 

Moore v. King (1842), 3 Curt. 243 694 

Moore V. Met. Ey. Co. (1872), L. R. 8 Q. B. 36 ; 42 L. J. Q. B. 23 ; 27 

L. T. 579 ; 21 W. E. 145 686, 643 

Moore v. Moore (1755), 2 Ves. sen. 596, 603 180 

Moore v. Moore (1871), 6 Ir. R. Bq. 166 142 

Moore «. Moore (1874), 43 L. J. Ch. 617; L. R. 18 Eq. 474; 30L.T.762; 

22 W. E. 729 638 

Moore v. Mourgue (1776), 2 Cowp. 479 39 

Moore D. Oastler (1836), St. Ev. 641, 642 255 

Moore V. Peaohey, (1891) 2 Q. B. 707 ; 39 W. E. 592 1181 

Moore v. Smith (1826), 14 Serg. & E. 393 527 

Moore V. Terrell (1833). 4 B. & Ad. 870 ; 1 N. & M. 559 6S1 

Moores;. Whitehouse (1864), 3t L. J. P. &M. 31; 3S. &T. 567; 11 L T. 

458 307 

Moorhouse v. Newton (1849), 3 De G. & Sm. 307 480 

More (should be Moor) v. Salter (1615), 3 Buls. 79 1198 

Moreau and Carleton's Trial (1820), 200 900 

Morewood v. "Wilkes (1833), 6 C. & P. 144 135 

Morewood v. Wood (1792), 14 East, 327, n. ; 12 R. R. 537. .393, 399, 401, 1226, 

1227 

Morgan v. Boys (1836), cited 7 A. & E. 337 371 

Morgan v. Brydges (1818), 2 Stark. R. 314 945 

Morgan v. Chetwynd (1865), 4 F. & F. 451 166 

Morgan v. Couohman (1853), 14 C. B. 100 ; 2 C. L. E. 63 ; 23 L. J. 

C. P. 36 629 

Morgan i). Davies (1878), 3 C. P. D. 260 ; 39 L. T. 60 ; 26 "W. R. 816 . . 35 
Morgan v. Griffith (1871), L. E. 6 Ex. 70 ; 40 L. J. Ex. 46 ; 23 L. T. 783 ; 

19 W. E. 957 745 

Morgan v. Hatohell (1856), 24 L. J. Ch. 135 ; 19 Beav. 96 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 

125 731 

Morgan v. Hedger (1870), L. E. 5 C. P. 485 ; 40 L. J. M. C. 13 263 

Morgan v. Lond. Gen. Omnibus Co. (1884), 12 Q. B. D. 203; 53 L. J. 

Q. B. 352 ; 50 L. T. 687 ; 32 W. R. 416 779 

Mors-an v. Morgan (1832), 9 Bing. 359 ; 2 L. J. C. P. 27 ; 2 Moo. & So. 

490 372, 1218 

Morgan v. Nicholl (1866), 36 L. J. C. P. 86 ; L. R. 2 C. P. 117 ; 15 L. T. 

184; 15 W. E. 110; 12 Jur. ISr. S. 963 327 

Morgan .;. Pike (1864), 14 C. B. 473 ; 2 C. L. E. 696 ; 23 L. J. 0. P. 64. . 67fl 
Morgan v. Eavey (1861), 6 H. & N. 265 ; 30 L. J. Ex. 131 ; 3 L. T. 784 ; 

9W.R.376; 2P.&F.283 162 

I%e re/srirwei are to pages, not to paragraplt*. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXXXl 

PAQE 

TSInrgan v. Rowlands (1872), 41 L. J. Q. B. 187 ; L. E. 7 Q. B. 493 ; 26 

L. T. 855; 20 "W. R. 726 715, 1125 

Morgan v. Sim (1858), 11 Moo. P. C. 0. 307 6 

Morgan v. Sykes (1842), cited Coats v. Chaplin, 3 Q. B. 486 670 

Morgan v. Thome (1841), 7 M. & W. 408 ; 9 D. P. C. 228 ; 5 Jur. 294 ; 

10 L. J. Ex. 125 488, 1111 

Morgan o. Whitmore (1852), 6 Ex. 716 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 289 146 

Morgan's case (1764), 1 Lea. C. C. 54 904 

Morgans v. Bridges (1818), 1 B. & Aid. 650 543 

Moriarty v. Grey (1860), 12 Ir. C. L. R. 129 302 

Moriarty v. Lond. Chat. & D. Ry. Co. (1870), 39 L. J. Q. B. 109 ; L. R. 

5 Q. B. 314 : 22 L. T. 163 ; 18 W. R. 625 520 

Morley v. Attenborough (1849), 3 Ex. 500 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 148 ; 13 Jur. 282 775 
Morley v. Morley (1855), 5 De G. M. & G. 610 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 1097 ; 25 

L. J. Ch. 1 1 38, 720 

Morley's, Ld., case (1666), Kel. (J.) 55 ; 6 How. St. Tr. 771 . . . .328, 330, 340 

Mornington v. Mornington (1861), 2 J. & H. 697 592 

Morrell v. Dickey (1814), 1 Johns. (Ch. Am.) 153 1150 

Morrell v. Eisher (1849), 4 Ex. 604 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 273 803, 804 

Morrell v. Frith (1838), 3 M. & W. 402 ; 8 C. & P. 246 ; 1 H. & H. 100 ; 

2 Jur. 619; 7 L. J. Ex. 172 44, 710, 712 

Morrell v. Martin (1841), 3 M. & 6r. 593 ; 4 Scott, N. R. 300 1101 

MorreU v. Morrell (1882), 7 P. Div. 68 ; 51 L. J. P. & M. 49 ; 46 L. T. 

485 ; 30 "W. R. 491 ; 46 J. P. 328 141 

Morris V. Bethell (1869), L. R. 4 C. P. 7C5 ; L. R. 5 C. P. 47 ; 38 L. J. 

C. P. 379 ; 17 "W. R. 736 241 

Morris V. Burdett (1808), 1 Camp. 218 ; 10 R. R. 667 524 

Morris V. Davies (1866, should be 1827), 3 C. & P. 215, 427 ; 5 CI. & Fin. 

163 ; 1 M. & R. 271, n 101, 422 

Morris v. Glynn (1859), 27 Beav. 218 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 1047 684 

Morris V. Hammer (1833), 7 Pet. 554 1179 

Morris v. Hauser (1841), 2 M. & Rob. 392 ; Car. & M. 29 313 

Morris v. Miller (1767), 4 Burr. 2057 ; 1 W. Bl. 632 149, 295, 549 

Morrison v. Arnold (1817), 19 Ves. 670 353 

Morrison v. Gen. St. Navig. Co. (1852), 8 Ex. 733 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 233 ... . 6 

Morrison v. KeUy (1762), 1 W. Bl. 385 987 

Morrison v. I^ennard (1827), 3 C. & P. 127 897 

Morrison v. Martin (1846), 5 Hare, 507 803 

Morrisons. Univ. Marine Ins. Co. (1872), 42 L. J. Ex. 17, 115 ; L. R. 

8 Ex. 40, 197 ; 27 L. T. 791 ; 21 W. R. 196 156 

Morritt V. Douglass (1872), 42 L. J. P. & M. 10 ; L. R. 3 P. & D. 1 ; 27 

L. T. 591 ; 21 W. R. 162 694 

Morrogh v. Power (1842), 5 Ir. L. R. 494 713 

Morse V. Royal (1806), 12 Ves. 362 ; 8 R. R. 338 493, 494 

Mortimer v. M'CaUan (1840), 6 M. & W. 68 ; 4 Jux. 172 ...308, 309, 388, 1049, 

1052, 1054, 1059 

Mortimer ». Mortimer (1820), 2 Hagg. Cons. 316 603, 558 

Mortimer ». Shortall (1842), 2 Dm. & War. 371 749 

Mortimore v. Wright (1840), 6 M. & W. 482 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 158 168 

Morton v. Chandler (1831), 8 Greenl. 9 746 

Morton v. Copeland(1865), 16 Com. 517; 24 L. J. C. P. 517; 1 Jur. N. S. 

Q'jQ ^ ^ ^ 267 729 

Morton' V.Tibbett ('mo')', 15 Q. B. 434; "I'g L. J. Q.' B. 382 ; 14 Jur. ' 

669 689, 682 

Morton v. Woods (1868), L. R. 3 Q. B. 658 ; 37 L. J. Q. B. 242 ; L. R. 

4 Q. B. 293 ; 38 L. J. ft. B. 81 ; 17 W. R. 411 ; 9 B. & S. 659 97 

Moseley v. Davies (1822), 11 Price, 162 398, 401, 410 

Moseley v. Hanford (1830), 10 B. & C. 729 ; 5 M. & R. 607 757 

Moaeley v. M'MuUen (1856), 6 Ir. C. L. R. 69 222 

Moss V. Ang.-Egyp. Nav. Go. (1865), L. R. 1 Ch. 108; 36 L. J. Ch. 179 ; 

14W. R. 150 1117 

Moss V. Russell (1884), 1 Times L. R. 13 162 

Mossomi". Ivy (1684), 10 How. St. Tr. 562 362, 1179 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CXXXU TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAoa 
Moasopi). Eadon (1810), 16 Ves. 430 308 

Mostyn v. Fabrigas (1774), 1 Cowp. 174 ; 1 Sm. L. C. 628 7, 51, 52, 938 

Mostyn v. Mostyn (1854), 3 De a. M. & U-. 140 ; 23 L. J. Ch. 925 ; 5 H. L. 

Cas. 155 795 

Mostynt). West Mostyn Ooal & Iron Co. (1876), 34 L. T. 531 602 

Motteram v. East. Cos. Ry. Co. (1859), 29 L. J. M. C. 57 ; 7 0. B. N. S. 

58 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 759 1054, 1089 

Mouflet 4). Cole (1872), L. B,. 7 Ex. 70 ; L. R. 8 Ex. 32 ; 41 L. J. Ex. 28 ; 

42 L. J. Ex. 8 ; 27 L. T. 678 ; 21 W. R. 175 16 

Mould V. Williams (1844), 5 Q. B. 473 ; B. & M. 631 1099, 1100, 1101 

Moule V. Brown (1838), 4 Bing. N. C. 266 ; 5 Scott, 694 ; 1 Am. 79 ; 2 Jur. 

277 32 

Mouusey v. Bumham (1841), 1 Hare, 15 1208 

Mounson v. Bourn (1648), Cro. Car. 526 19 

Mount V. Boa-ert (1816), Anthon, 190 ' 515 

Mount V. Larkins (1831), 8 Bing. 108 ; 1 M. & Scott, 165 38, 818 

Mountague v. Harrison (1857), 27 L. J. G. P. 24 ; 3 C. B N. S. 292 ; 

4 Jur. N. S. 29 869 

Mountford v. Harper (1847), 16 M. & W. 825 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 182 154 

Mountnoyi). Oollier(1853),22L.J. Q.B. 124; 4E. &B. 630; 17 Jur. 503.. 98, 

444, 445 

Mountatephen v. Brooke (1819), 1 CWtty, R. 390 487, 713 

Mountstephen v. Lakeman (1874), 39 L. J. Q. B. 275 ; L. R. 5 Q. B. 613 ; 

41 L. J. Q. B. 67 ; L. R. 7 Q. B. 196 ; L. R. 7 H. L. 17 ; 43 L. J. Q. B. 

188 ; 30 L. T. 437 ; 22 W. R. 617 678 

Moylan v. Nolan (1864), 17 Ir. C. L. R. 427 166 

Moyle«). Jenkins (1881), 8 Q. B. D. 116 ; 51 L. J. Q. B. 112; 46 L. T. 

472 ; 30 W. R. 324 156 

Muilman v. D'Equino (1795), 2 H. Bl. 564 37 

MulhoUand v. KiUen (1874), I. R. 9 Eq. 471 1109 

MuUaly V. Walsh (1872), I. R. 6 C. L. 314 171 

Mullen, Re (1871), I. R. 5 Eq. 309 695, 696 

MuUett V. Hunt (1833), Car. & M. 752 831, 835 

Mulliner v. Florence 11878), 3 Q. B. D. 484 ; 47 L. J. Q. B. 700 ; 38 L. T. 

167 ; 26 W R. 385 5, 781 

Mullins V. Collins (1874), L. R. 9 Q. B. 292 ; 43 L. J. M. C. 67 ; 29 L. T. 

838 ; 22 W. R. 297 107 

Mumford v. Gething (1859), 29 L. J. C. P. 105 ; 7 C. B. N. S. 305 784 

Munoey v. Dennis (1856), 1 H. & N. 216 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 66 781 

Munday D. Asprey (1880), 13 Ch. D. 855; 49 L. J. Ch. 216; 28W. R. 347.. 673 
Munu V. Baker(1817), 2 Stark. R. 255 ; Holt, N P. 646, n. ; 19 R. R. 715. . 1096 

Muun ». Godbold (1825), 3 Bing. 292 ; 11 Moore, C. P. 49 300 

Munro, Ex parte (1876), 1 Q. B. D. 724 ; 45 L. J. Q. B. 816 ; 35 L. T. 

857 ; 24 W. R. 1017 724 

Munro V. De Cheinant (1815), 4 Camp. 215 539 

Munro «!. Munro (1840), 7 CI. & Fin. 842 179 

Munro V. Vandam (1794), cited 1 Park, Ins. 469 176 

Munroe v. Pilkington (1862), 31 L. J. Q. B. 81 ; 2 B. & S. 11 ; 6 L. T. 

N". S. 21 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 557 1140, 1154 

Munster v. Lamb (1883), U Q. B. D. 688 ; 52 L. J. Q. B. 726 ; 49 L. T. 

252 ; 32 W. R. 248 ; 47 J. P. 805 869 

MurcMe v. Black (1865), 34 L. J. C. P. 337 ; 19 C. B. N. S. 190 ; 11 Jur. 

N.S.608; 12L.T.735; 13 W. R. 89'i 114,115 

Murgatroyd v. Murgatroyd (1828), cited 2 St. Ev. 307, n. (o) 257 

Miirfeta z. Wolfhageu (1849), 2 0. & K. 744 1219 

Miirly V. M'Dermott (1838), 8 A. & E. 138 ; 3 N. & P. 256 ; 1 W. "W. 

* H. 226 113 

Murphy <'. Boese (1875), 44 L. J. Ex. 40; L. R. 10 Ex. 126 ; 32 L. T. 122; 

23 W. R. 474 668 

Murphy v. Meredith (184'2), 5 Ir. L. R. 120 7U 

Murphy «). Nolan (1873), I. R. 7 Eq. 49-( 818 

Murphy ti. SuUivan (1866), 11 Ir. Jur. N. S. Ill 682 

Murray, In the goods of (1837), 1 Curt. 596 174 

The references a/re to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXXXIH 

PAOB 

Murray v. Coster (1825), i Cowen, 635 615 

Murray v. Sherifis of Dublin (1841), Arm. M. & O. 130 977 

Murray v. Oregory (1850), 6 Ex. 468 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 355 ; 14 Jur. 553 293 

Murray ». Mace (1874), Ir. 8 C. L. 396 774 

Murray v. Mackenzie (1876), L. E. 10 C. P. 626 ; 44 L. J. C. P. 313 ; 

32 L. T. 777 ; 23 "W. E. 595 736 

Murray v. Milner (1879), 48 L. J. Ch. 776 ; 12 Ch. D. 849 ; 41 L. T. 213; 

27 W. E. 881 415 

MuiTay V. Parker (1854), 19 Beav. 306 749 

Murray v. E. of Stair (1823), 2 B. & C. 82 ; 3 Dowl. & E. 278 746, 1203 

Musgrave v. Emerson (1847), 10 Q. B. 326 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 174 440 

Mussumat Cheetha v. Baboo Miheen Lall (1867), 11 Moore, Indian App. C. 

369, 380 169 

Mutual Life, &o. ». Hillman, (1892), 146 U. S. 285 377, 794 

Mutual Loan Fund Ass. v. Sudlow (1858), 28 L. J. C. P. 108 ; 5 C. B. N. S. 

449 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 338 758 

Myers i). Defries (1879), 4 Ex. D. 176 ; 40 L. T. 795 ; 27 W. E. 791 ; 48 

L. J. Ex. 446 41, 42 

Myers v. Perigal (1851-2), 2 De G. M. & G. 699 ; 11 C. B. 90 ; 21 L. J. 

C. P. 217 ; 16 Jur. 1118 684 

Myers v. Sari (1860), 30 L. J. Q. B. 9 ; 3 E. & E. 306 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 97. .764, 766 
Myers v. Willis (1855), 17 C. B. 77 ; 18 C. B. 886 ; 25 L. J. C. P. 39, 256 ; 

2 Jur. N. S. 41 179, 1176 

Myles V. Burton (1884), 14 L. E. Ir. 258 539 

Myriek v. Dame (1862), 9 Gush. 248 758 

Mysore, &c., Co., Ee (1889), 42 Ch. D. 535 ; 68 L. J. Ch. 731 ; 61 L. T. 

463 ; 37 W. E. 794 ; 1 Meg. 347 346 

Nabin v. Bassett (1883), 26 Ch. D. 21 ; 53 L. J. Ch. 253 ; 49 L. T. 454 ; 

32 W. E. 70 349 

Nagle V. Shea (1875), I. E. 9 C. L. 389 293, 1213 

Naish V. Brown (1846), 2 C. & K. 219 274 

Napper v. Sanders (1628), Hutton, 119 170 

Nash V. Armstrong (1861), 30 L. J. C. P. 286 ; 10 C. B. N. S. 269 ; 9 

W. E. 782 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 1060 751 

Nash V. Gilkeson (1819), 5 Serg. & E. 352 262 

Nash V. Hodgson (1856), 26 L. J. Ch. 186 ; 6 De G. M. & G. 474 ; 1 Jur. 

N. S. 946 714, 716 

Nash V. Turner (1795), 1 Esp. 217 1213 

Natchbolt V. Porter (1689), 2 Vem. 112 659 

Nate's {or Nute's) case (1800) 6 Peters, Abridg. 82 ; 3 Euss. C. & M. 458 

(6th ed.) 562 

Naylor v. Semmes (1829), 4 Gill. & J. 273 969 

Nealv. Jay (1684), cited 12 Mod. 86; 1 Salk. 281 1179 

■ Neal v. Wilding (1740), 2 Str. 1161 423 

Neale v. Fry (1684), cited 1 Salk. 281 ; 12 Mod. 86 1179 

Neale v. Parkin (1795), 1 Esp. 229 523 

Nedby v. Nedby (1852), 21 L. J. Ch. 446 ; 5 De G. & Sm. 377 137 

Needham v. Bremner (1866), L. E. 1 C. P. 583 ; 35 L. J. C. P. 313 ; 1 

H. & E. 731 1103 

Needham v. Fraser (1845), 1 C. B. 816 ; 3 D. & L. 190 ; 14 L. J. C. P. 

256 ; 9 Jur. 734 835 

Needham*. Smith (1704), 2 Vem. 463 ^..909, 910 

Neeley v. Lock (1838), 8 C. & P. 632 105 

Neil V. Neil (1829, 1839), 1 Leigh, E. 6, 10, 21 142 

Neile v. Jakle (1849), 2 C. & K. 709 528 

Neill 1/. D. of Devonshire (1876-82), 2 L. E. Ir. 154 ; 8 App. Cas. 147. .42, 296, 

396, 403, 406, 406 
NeUson V. Harford (1841), 8 M. & W. 806, 818, 819 ; Webs. Pat. Eep. 295, 

328 ; 11 L. J. Ex. 20 43 

Nelson v. Walters (1890), 63 L. T. 328 631 

Nelson, Ee (1872), I. E. 6 Eq. 669 708 

Fol. I. ends with page 635. 



CXXXIV TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOB 
Nelsoii,La.».La.Briaport(1844,Bliouldbel846),8Beav.547; 10 Jur. 1043. .51,936 
Nelson 1). Coucli (1863), 15 C. B. N. S. 99 ; 8 L. T. 577 ; 11 W. R. 964 ; 

10 Jur. N. S. 366 1120 

Nelson v. Stooker (1859), 28 L. J. Ch. 760 ; 4 De O. & J. 758 541 

Nelson v. WWttall (1817), 1 B. & Aid. 19 1216 

Nepean v. Doe d. Knight (1847), 2 M. & W. 894 ; 2 Sm. L. C. 610, 629, 729. 173 

Neptunus, The (1799), 2 C. Eob. 110 1095 

Nesham «. Selby (1872), L. R. 13 Eq. 191 ; L. R. 7 Ch. 406 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 

551 ; 26 L. T. 145, 568 673 

Netherlands Steam Boat Co. v. Styles (1854), 9 Moo. P. C. C. 286 178 

Netherwood v. Wilkinson (1855), 17 C. B. 226 832 

Neve V. PenneU (1863), 2 New R. 508 ; 11 "W. R. 986 738 

Nevil V. Johnson (1703), 2 Vera. 447 327 

Nevill V. SnelHng (1880), 49 L. J. Ch. 777 ; 15 Ch. D. 679 ; 43 L. T. 244 ; 

29 W^ R 375 138 
Neville v. Fine Art's Co". ,' (1895) 2'q.'b.'i56 ';'72 l' T. 725'.'.'.'.'.'.liii.'i47, 643] 

Neville v. Wilkinson (1782), 1 Bro. C. C. 643 539 

Nevin V. Drysdale (1867), 36 L. J. Ch. 662 ; 15 W. R. 980 753, 806 

NewaU v. Elliott (1863), 1 H. & C. 797 ; 32 L. J. Ex. 120 ; 7 L. T. 758 ; 

11 W. R. 438 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 359 1160 

Newberry v. Benson (1854), 23 L. J. Ch. 1003 462 

Newbould v. Coltman (1851), 6 Ex. 189 ; 20 L. J. M. C. 149 1101 

Newbould v. Smith (1889), 14 App. Cas. 423 ; 55 L. J. Ch. 788 ; 55 L. T. 

194 ; 34 W. R. 690 447, 462 

Newburgh v. Newburgh (1712), 3 Bro. P. C. 653 1038 

Newby v. Reed (1763), cited 1 Park, Ins. 148 175 

Newby v. Sharpe (1877), 8 Ch. D. 39 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 617 ; 38 L. T. 583 ; 

26 W. R. 685 192 

Newcastle, D. of, v. Broxtowe (1832), 4 B. & Ad. 273 394 

Newcastle, D. of, v. Clark (1818), 8 Tauu. 627, 628 ; 2 Moore (C. P.) 666 ; 

20 R. R. 583 113 

Newcastle, D. of, v. Kinderley (1803), 8 Ves. 363, 375 ; 7 R. R. 71 108 

Newcastle, Master Pilots and Seamen of, v. Bradley (1851), 2 E. & B. 

428, n. ; 23 L. J. Q. B. 35 '. 791 

NeweU v. Radford (1867), 37 L. J. C. P. 1 ; L. R. 3 C. P. 52 ; 17 L. T. 

1 18 ; 16 W. R. 97 671 

Newell «;. SimpMn (1830), 6 Bing. 565 ; 4 M. & P. 395 996 

New England Bank v. Lewis (1829), 8 Pick. 113 1139 

Newenham v. xSmith (1859), 10 Ir. C. L. R. 245 788 

Newhall v. Holt (1840), 6 M. & W. 662 ; 4 Jur. 610 291 

Newham v. Raithby (1811), 1 Phillim. 315 1047 

Newington v. Levy (1870), 40 L. J. C. P. 29 ; £. R. 6 C. P. 180 ; 23 L. 

T. 595 ; 19 W. R. 473 1119 

Newman v. Jenkins (1830), 10 Pick. 615 172 

Newman v. Piercy (1876), 4 Ch. D. 41 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 36 ; 35 L. T. 461 ; 

25 W. R. 317 803 

Newman v. Stretch (1829), M. & M. 338 379 

New Romney, Mayor, &c., v. New Romney Commissioners of Sewers, (1892) 

1 Q. B. 840 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 558 ; 56 J. P. 756 404 

Newry and Ennisk. Ry. Co. n. Combe (1849), 6 Railw. Cas. 633 ; 3 Ex. 

565 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 325 100 

Newsamji. Carr (1817), 2 Stark. R. 69; 19 R. R. 675 252, 255 

Newsome v. Coles (1811), 2 Camp. 617 ; 12 R. R. 756 1095 

Newton v. Askew (1848), 6 Hare, 319 869 

Newton v. Belcher (1848), 1 Q. B. 921 ; 6 Railw. Cas. 38 ; 18 L. J. Q. B. 

53 ; 13 Jur. 253 530 

Newton v. Beresford (1831), Younge, Ex. R. 376 601 

Newton v. Blunt (1846), 3 C. B. 675 ; 4 D. & L. 674 ; 5 Railw. Cas. 29 ; 

16 L. J. C. P. 121 1115 

Newton V. Chaplin (1850), 10 C. B. 366 ; 19 L. J. C. P. 374 ; 14 Jur. 1121. 320 

Newton V. Clarke (18:i9), 2 Curt. 320 695 

Newton v. Constable (1841), 2 Q. B. 162 ; 1 G. & D. 408 ; 9 D. P. C. 933 ; 

6 Jur. 317 869, 870, 871 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXXXV 

FAOE 

Newton V. ElKs (1855), 5 E. & B. 115 ; 24 L. J. Q. B. 337 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 

850 227 

Newton V. Harland (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 956 ; 1 Soott, N. R. 502; 9 Dowl. 

16 ; 1 W. P. C. 53 ; 4 Jur. 992 819 

Newton ». Liddiard (1848), 12 Q. B. 927; 6 Railw. Cas. 42; 18 L. J. 

Q. B. 53 530 

Newton v. Ricketts (1848), 6 Notes of Cas. (Eoo. & M.) 35 942 

Newton v. Ricketts (1861), 8 H. L. C. 260 ; 31 L. J. Ch. 2J7 134 

New Windsor case (1835), Knapp & O. 173 497 

Nias V. North. & East. Ry. Co. (1838), 3 My. & Cr. 365 ; 7 L. J. Ch. 142 ; 

2 K. 76 601, 995 

Niohol V. Godts (1854), 10 Ex. 191 ; 23 L. J. Ex. 314 776 

Nicholas and Freeman v. Binns (1858), 1 S. & T. 243 ; 27 L. J. P. & M. 6 170 

NichoUe v. Plume (1824), 1 C. & P. 272 691 

Nicholls v. Dowding (1815), 1 Stark. R. 81 ; 18 R. R. 746 . .386, 488, 494, 921 

Nicholls V. Downes (1830), 1 M. & Rob. 13 520 

NiohoUa v. Goldsmith (1831), 7 "Wend. 160 454 

Nicholls V. Osbom (1727), 2 P. Wma. 419 789 

Nicholls V. Parker (1811), 14 East, 331, n. ; 12 R. R. 542 396, 410 

Nicholls V. Walker (1634), Cro. Car. 394 1101 

Nichols, In re (1872), 41 L. J. P. & M. 88 ; L. R. 2 P. & M. 461 ; 27 L. 

T. 323 ; 21 W. R. 161 173 

Nichols V. Johnson (1834), 10 Conn. 192 1199 

Nichols V. Webb (1823), 8 Wheat. 326 454 

Nicholson, Ex parte. Re Willson (1880), 14 Ch. D. 243 ; 49 L. J. Bk. 68 ; 

43 L. T. 266 ; 28 W. R. 936 849 

Nicholson v. Bower (1858), 1 E. & E. 172 ; 28 L. J. Q. B. 97 ; 5 Jur. N. 

S. 246 689, 692 

Nicholson v. Bradfield Union (1866), 35 L. J. Q. B. 176 ; L. R. 1 Q. B. 

620 ; 7 B. & S. 744 641 

Nicholson v. Mulligan (1868), I. R. 3 Eq. 308 806 

Nicholson «. BeviU (1836), 4 A. & E. 675 ; 6 N. & M. 192 1194 

Nicholson i: Smith (1822), 3 Stark. R. 129 515 

NickaUs v. Merry (1875), L. R. 7 H. L. 530 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 575 ; 32 L. T. 

623 ; 23 W. R. 663 158 

Nickells v. Atherstone (1847), 10 Q. B. 944 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 371 ; 11 Jur. 

778 660, 661 

Nickolson v. Knowles (1820), 5 Madd. 47 545 

NieoU V. Greaves (1864), 33 L. J. C. P. 259 ; 17 C. B. N. S. 27 ; 10 L. T. 

531 ; 12 W. R. 961 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 919 36 

Nifa, The, (1892) 1 R. 640; (1892) P. 411; 62 L. J. P. 12; 69 L. T. 56. .740, 766 

Nightiugal v. Devisme (1770), 5 Burr. 2594 1036 

Niles V. Brackett (1819), 16 Mass. 378 910 

Noble's Trusts, Ee (1871), I. R. 5 Eq. 140 , 798 

Noble V. Chapman (1854), 14 C. B. 400 ; 23 L. J. C. P. 66 ; 18 Jur. 44 . . 190 

Noble V. Durell (1789), 3 T. R. 271 765 

Noble V. Kennoway (1780), 2 Doug. 613 157, 232, 765, 782 

Noble V. Ward (1867), 35 L. J. Ex. 81 ; L. R. 1 Ex. 117 ; 4 H. & C. 149 ; 

36 L. J. Ex. 91 ; L. R. 2 Ex. 135 752 

Noble V. WUlock and Phelps (1871), 40 L. J. P. & M. 60 ; L. R. 2 P. & 

D. 276 ; 25 L. T. 65 ; 19 W. R. 1115 1132 

Nodiu V. Murray (1812), 3 Camp. 228 : 13 R. R. 796 296 

Noding »>. Alleston (1892), cited Greenleaf on Ev. 15th edit. 369 698 

Noel V. WeUs (1669), 1 Lev. 235 1103, 1105 

Nolan V. Copeman (1873), L. R. 8 Q. B. 84 ; 42 L. J. Q. B. 44 ; 27 h. T. 

789 ; 21 W. R. 263 818 

Nolan V. Gumley (1863), 14 Ir. C. L. R. 301 732, 734 

Norden v. Williamson (1808), 1 Taun. 377 891 

Nordonj;.Defrie8(1882),8Q.B.D.508; 61 L. J. Q. B. 415; 30W.R.612.. 1186 

Norman v. Cole (1800), 3 Esp. 253 747 

Norman v. Morrell (1799), 4 Ves. 769 ; 4 R. R. 347 762 

Norman v. PhiUips (1846), 14 M. & W. 283 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 306 ; 9 Jur. 832. . 689, 692 
Norreys v. Franks (1874), I. R. 9 Eq. 18 801 

Vol. I. ends with page 63S. 



CXXXn TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

*A8B 

Norris v. Beach (1807), 2 Johns. 294 866 

Norris v. Cooke (1857), 30 L. T. (Ir.) 224 667 

Norris V. Cottle (1850), 2 H. L. Cas. 647 ; 14 Jur. 703 540 

Norris V. Miles (1808), 1 Camp. 389 ; 10 R. R. 710 385, 496 

North of Eng. Joint Stock Bk. Co., Re, Ex parte Gouthwaite (1861), 20 

L. J. Ch. 182, 192, 193 ; 3 Mac. & G. 187 74 

North of Eng. Joint-Stock Bk. Co., Re, Ex parte StrafEon's Exors. (1863), 

22 L. J. Oh. 194 ; 1 De G. M. & G. 576 ; 4 De G. & Sm. 256 541 

North German Lloyd St. Ship. Co. v. Elder (The Sohwable) (1861), 1 Lush. 

239 ; 14 Moo. P. C. 0. 241 ; 4 L. T. 160 178 

North- West. Ry. Co. v. McMichael (1850), 5 Ex. 855 ; 14 Jur. 987 ; 20L. J. 

Ex. 6 100 

Northam v. Latouche (1829), 4 C. & P. 140 1019 

Northeote v. Doughty (1879), 4 C. P. D. 385 ; 24 Sol. J. 776 718 

Northumberland, D. of, v. Todd (1878), 7 Ch. D. 777 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 343 ; 

38 L. T. 746 ; 28 W. R. 350 914 

Norton V. Bazett (1856), Deane, Eoc. R. 259 696 

Norton V. Pettibone (1829), 7 Conn. 319 510 

Norwich & Lowestoft Nav. Co. v. Theobald (1828), M. & M. 163 1096 

Norwich, Bishop of, v. Pearsc (1868), 37 L. J. Ecc. 90 ; L. R. 2 A. &E. 281 . .884, 885 

Notor V. Brooks (1861), 7 H. & N. 499 778 

Nottidge V. Prince (1858), 2 Giflf. 246 ; 29 L. J. Ch. 857 136 

Nottingham, Guard, of, v. TomMnson (1879), 4 C. P. D. 343 ; 48 L. J. 

M. C. 171 ; 28 "W. R. 151 621 

NoveUi V. Rossi (1831), 2 B. & Ad. 767 ; 9 L. J. K. B. O. S. 307. . . .1147, 1200 
Nowlan V. Ablett (1835), 2 C. M. & R. 54 ; 1 Gale, 72 ; 5 Tyr. 709 ; 4 

L. J. Ex. 155 36 

Nowlan v. Gibson (1847), 12 Ir. L. R. 5, 8—12 89, 1110, 1113, 1140 

Nugent V. Smith (1876), 1 0. P. D. 423 ; 45 L. J. C. P. 697 ; 34 L. T. 827 ; 

25 W. R. 117 771 

Nunn's WUl, Re (1875), 44 L. J. Ch. 255 ; L. R. 19 Eq. 331 798 

Nunn 1). Fabian (1866), 35 L. J. Ch. 140 ; L. R. 1 Oh. 36 631, 688 

Nye i>. Maodonald (1870), 39 L. J. P. C. 34 ; L. R. 3 P. C. 331 ; 23 L. T. 

220 : 18 W. R. 1075 9 



OAKippLE V. Copous (1791), 4 T. R. 361 624 

Oakeley v. Ooddeen (1861), 2 F. & F. 651 271 

Oitkes V. Hill (1833), 14 Pick. 442 1178 

Cakes v. Turquand (1867), L. R. 2 H. L. 325 ; 36 L. J. Oh. 919 1076 

Oakley v. Monck (1865), L. R. 1 Ex. 159 ; 35 L. J. Ex. 87 ; 14 L. T. 20 ; 

14 W. R. 406 ; 4 H. & C. 251 169 

Oastler v. Henderson (1877), 2 Q. B. D. 575 ; 46 L. J. Q. B. 607 ; 37 L. T. 22 660 

Obicini v. Bligh (1832), 8 Biag. 335 ; 1 Moo. & S. 477 1147 

O'Brien v. Lewis (1863), 32 L. J. Ch. 569 ; 4 GiEB. 221 ; 8 L. T. 380 ; 

11 W. R. 716; 9 Jur. N. S. 620 136 

O'Brien v. R. (1849), 2 H. L. Cas. 465 895 

O'Brien v. Sheil (1873), I. R. 7 Eq. 255 666 

Ocean, The (1804), 6 0. Rob. Adm. 90 179 

Ochsenbein v. Papelier (1873), L. R. 8 Ch. 695 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 861 ; 28 L. T. 

4-59 ; 21 W. R. 616 1132, 1142 

O'Oonnell's case (1843-4), Arm. & T. 275 383 

O'Connell v. Butler (1819), Milw. (Ir. Ecc.) 102 140 

O'ConueU v. The Queen (1844), 11 01. & Fin. 373 435 

O'Connor v. Majoribanks (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 435 ; 11 L J. C. P. 267. .690, 591 

O'Connor v. Spaight (1804), 1 Sch. & Lef. 306 682 

Odell, Re (1849), 7 Notes of Cas. (Ecc. & Mar.) 267 435, 698 

O'Donnelli). O'Donell (1882), 13 L. R. Ir. 226 765 

O'DonneU v. O'DouneU (1878), 1 L. R. Ir. 284 16 

O'Flanaganji. Geoghegan (1864), 16 C. B. N. S. 636 830 

Ogden V. Hesketh (1849), 2 C. & K. 772 481 

Ogilvie «>. Ourrie (1868), 27 L. J. Oh. 541 ; 16 W. R. 769 ; 18 L. T. 693 . . 129 

Ogilvie V. Foljambe (1817), 3 Mer. 53 ; 17 R. R. 13 674 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXXXVU 

PAGE 

Ogle V. Cook (1748), 1 Ves. sen. 177 1215 

Ogle V. Noroliffe (1708), 2 Ld. Eaym. 869 19 

Ogle V. Ld. Vane (1868), L. E. 2 Q. B. 275 ; 36 L. J. Q. B. 175 ; 7 B. & S. 

855 752 

O'Grady v. Corr (1876), I. R. 10 Eq. Ill 462 

Ohlsen v. Terrero (1874), 44 L. J. Oh. 155 ; L. E. 10 Ch. 127 ; 31 L. T. 

811 ; 23 W. E. 195 922 

O'Kane v. O'Kane (1892), 30 L. E. Ir. 489 Add. [125] 

Okeden v. CUMen (1826), 2 Euss. 309 786 

Olding, Ee (1841), 2 Curt. 865 697 

O'Leary «. Douglass (1878), 1 Ir. L. E. 46 704 

Olive V. Ouin (1668), 2 Sid. 146 8, 283 

Oliver o. Bartlett (1819), 1 B. & B. 269 373 

Oliver V. Hunting (1890), 44 Ch. D. 206 ; 59 L. J. Ch. 265 ; 62 L. T. 108 ; 

38 W. E. 618 672 

Oliver ^."Woodrofee (1889), 4 M.&W. 650; 7Do-wl.l66; 1 H.&H. 474. .732, 733 
OUivant v. Bayley (1843), 5 Q. B. 288 ; D. & M. 373 ; 13 L. J. Q. B. 34 ; 

7 Jur. 1130 777 

Olver V. Johns (1870), 39 L. J. P. & M. 7 697 

O'Meagher v. O'Meagher (1883), 11 L. E. Ir. 117 697 

Oinichund v. Barker (1744-5), Willes, 550 901, 903, 905, 1178 

Ommaney v. Stilwell (1856), 23 Beav. 328 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 1058 173 

O'Neill V. Allen (1869), 9 Ir. L. E. N. S. 132, 141 123 

O'NeiU V. Bell (1866), I. E. 2 C. L. 68 768 

O'Neill V. Eead (1845), 7 Ir. L. E. 434 487 

Onions v. Tyrer (1716), 1 P. Wms. 43 708 

Onslow, Ee, Ex parte Kihble (1875), L. E. 10 Ch. 373 ; 44 L. J. Bk. 63 ; 

32 L. T. 138 ; 23 W. E. 433 718 

Oppenheim v. White Lion Hotel Co. (1871), 6 L. E. C. P. 515 ; 40 L. J. 

C. P. 231 : 25 L. T. 93 162 

Ord, In re (1878), 9 Ch. D. 667 808 

O'Eeilly, Ee (1874), 43 L. J. P. & M. 5 ; 29 L. T. 546 ; 22 W. E. 224 . . 793 

Ormerod v. Chadwick (1847), 16 M. & W. 367 ; 16 L. J. M. C. 143 131 

Ormrod v. Huth (1845), 14 M. & W. 664 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 366 775 

O'Rorke v. Bolinghroke (1877), 2 App. Gas. 814 ; 26 "W. E. 239 138 

O'Eourke v. Perceval (1811), 2 Ball & B. 58 ; 12 E. E. 68 676 

Orr V. Dickenson (1858), Johns. 1 ; 28 L. J. Ch. 616 : 5 Jur. N. S. 672 . . 652 

Orr V. Morice (1821), 3 B. & B. 139 ; 6 Moore, C. P. 347 1211 

Orrell CoUiery Co., Ee (1879), 12 Ch. D. 681 ; 48 L. J. Ch. 665 1138 

Orrell v. Coppock (1857), 26 L. J. Ch. 269 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 1244 676 

Orrett v. Corser (1856), 21 Beav. 52 436 

Osbom V. Lond. Dock Co. (1855), 10 Ex. 698 ; 3 C. L. E. 313 ; 24 L. J. 

Ex. 140 ; IJur. N. S. 93 964 

Osbom V. Thompson (1839), 2 M. & Eob. 256 ; 9 C. & P. 337 258, 259, 274 

Osgathorpe ». Diseworth (1745-6), 2 Str. 1256 ; Burr. 261 1139 

Osgood V. Manhattan Co. (1824), 3 Cowen, 612 493 

O'SuUivan v. Burke (1875), I. E. 9 C. L. 106 444 

Oswald, In re (1874), 43 L. J. P. & M. 24 ; L. E. 3 P. & D. 162 141 

Oswell V. Shepherd (see Re Smith). 

Ottaway v. Hamilton (1878), 47 L. J. C. P. 725 ; 3 C. P. D. 393 ; 38 L. T. 

925 ; 26 W. E. 783 166 

Otter, The (1874), L. E. 4 Adm. 203 ; 30 L. T. 43 ; 22 W. E. 557 260 

Ougier v. Jennings (1800), 1 Camp. 505, 506, n. ; 10 E. R. 739, n 766 

Outh-waite v. Luntley (1816), 4 Camp. 179 ; 16 R. E. 771 1194, 1203 

Outram v. Morewood (1803), 3 Easft, 346 ; 5 T. R. 121 ; 7 R. R. 473 88, 89, 

446, 1110, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1120 
Overend, Gumey & Co. v. Oriental Finance Corp. (1874), L. E. 7 H. L. 

348 ; 31 L. T. 322 ; 21 W. E. 504 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 502 758 

Owen V. Flack (1826), 2 Sim. & St. 606 520 

Owen V. Warburton (1805), 1 Bos. & P. N. E. 326 ; 8 E. E. 817 616 

Owen V. "Wynn (1878), 9 Ch. D. 29 ; 38 L. T. 623 ; 26 W. E. 644 994,1183 

Owings w. Wyant (1796), 1 Har. & M'H. 393 295 

Oxford Circuit ease (Spring, 1833), 5 C. & P. 542, n 183 

Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



CXXXVlll TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOB 

Oxford, ■Worcester, and Wolverhampton Ey. Co. v. Soudamore (1857), 1 
H. &N. 666 474 



Paoet v. liond. Tramways Co. (1877), 46 L. J. Ex. 440. n., 698 1186 

Pacific St. Nav. Co. v. Lewis (1847), 16 M. & W. 792 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 212 ; 

4 Dowl. & L. 6S1 187, 190 

Packard v. Richardson (1821), 17 Maes. 122 669 

Paddock v. Forrester (1842), 2 Scott, N. K. 734 ; 3 M. & Gr. 903 506, 5U 

Paddon v. Winch (1870), 39 L. J. Ch. 627 ; L. E. 9 Eq. 666 ; 22 L. T. 403 608 

Padgett V. Lawrence (1843), 10 Paige, 180 514 

Page t>. Carew (1831), 1 C. & J. 514 817 

Page V. Faucet (1591), Cro. Eliz. 227 16, 20 

Page V. Homana (1837), 2 Shepl. 478 1221 

Pam V. Beeston (1830), 1 M. & Eob. 20 9.'i4 

Paine & Layton, Ex parte, (1869), 4 Ch. App. 215 ; 38 L. J. Ch. 305. .321, 845 

Paine v. HaU (1812), 18 Ves. 475 140 

Paine v. M'Intier (1804), 1 Mass. 69 ; 10 Mass. 461 759 

Paine ». Strand Union (1846), 8 Q. B. 326 ; 15 L. J. M. C. 89 ; 10 Jur. 308 . . 639, 6t2 

Painter ». Ahel (1862), 3 F. & F. 518 529 

Palermo, The (1883), 9 P. D. 6 ; 53 L. J. P. D. & A. 6 1186 

Palethorp v. Furnish (1783), 2 Esp. 511, n 604 

Pallikelagatha Marcar «. Sigg (1880), L. E,. 7 lud. App. 83, 100 740 

Palmer v. Maclear (1858), 1 S. & T. 149 929 

Palmerj!.NewhaU(1855),30Beav.32; 8DeG.M.&G.74; 24L. J.Ch.424..806,807 

Palmer v. Pahner (1885), 18 L. E. Ir. Ig2 4, 419, 420 

Panton v. Holland (1819), 17 Johns. 92 201 

Panton v. Williams (1841), 2 Q. B. 192 ; 1 G. & D. 504 ; 10 L. J. Ex. Ch. 545 . . 25, 30 
Papendiok v. Bridgwater (1855), 5 E. & B. 166; 24 L. J. Q. B. 289 ; 1 Jur. 

N. S. 657 444, 446, 511 

Pardington v. South Wales Ey. Co. (1856), 1 H. & N. 392 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 105 723 

Pardee v. O'Connor (1848), 12 Ir. L. E. 63 521 

Pardee ». Price (1844), 13 M. & W. 267; 14 L. J. Ex. 212 302 

Parfitt V. Lawless (1872), 41 L. J. P. & M. 68 ; L. E. 2 P. & D. 462 ; 27 

L. T. 215 ; 21 W. R. 200 136 

Pargeter v. Harris (1845), 7 Q B. 708 ; 15 L. J. Q. B. 113 ; 10 Jur. 260.. 93 
Parker, In re, Bentham v. Wilson (1881), 15 Ch. D. 528 ; 17 Ch. D. 262; 

50 L. J. Ch. 639 ; 44 L. T. 885 ; 29 W. E. 855 146 

Parker v. Carter (1818), 4 Munf . 273 698 

Parker v. Gordon (1808), 7 East, 385 ; 3 Smith, 358 ; 6 Esp. 41 ; 8 E. E. 646 33 

Parker v. Hoskins (1810), 2 Taun. 223 328, 1214 

Parker v. Ibbetson (1858), 4 C. B. N. S. 348 ; 27 L. J. C. P. 236 ; 4 Jur. 

N. S. 636 153, 768 

Parker v. M'Kenna (1874), 43 L. J. Ch. 802 ; 30 L. T. 807 324 

Parker v. M'WiUiam (1830), 6 Bing. 683 ; 4 M. & P. 480 918 

Parker v. Morrell (1848), 2 PhiU. 453 496 

Parker v. Palmer (1821), 4 B. & Aid. 387 37 

Parker v. Potts (1816), 3 Dow, 23 ; 15 E. E. 1 176 

Parker v. Staniland (1809), 11 East, 362 ; 10 E. E. .')21 686 

Parker v. Taswell (1858), 2 De G. & J. 559 ; 27 L. J. Ch. 812 649 

Parker v. WaUis (1855), 5 E. & B. 21 689 

Parker i;. Wells (1881),18 Ch. D. 477; 46 L. T. 517 ; 30 W. E. 392 1189 

Parker v. Tates (1827), 12 Moore, C. P. 620 603 

Parkhurst v. Lowten (1816), 1 Mer. 401 ; 2 Swanst. 194 ; 15 R. E. 140 . . 960, 

961, 962, 965, 967, 968, 969 

Parkhurst v. Van Cortlandt (1814), 1 Johns. 280 673 

Parkin v. Moon (1836), 7 C. & P. 409 921, 944 

Parkins v. Hawkshaw (1817), 2 Stark. E. 239 ; 19 E. E. 711 506, 599 

Parkinson v. Lee (1802), 2 East, 314 ; 6 E. E. 429 776 

Parkinson v. Townsend (1875), 44 L. J. P. & M. 32 ; 33 L. T. 232 ; 23 W. 

R. 656 1132 

Parmenter v. Webber (1818), 8 Taun. 593 656 

Parmiter v. Coupland (1840), 6 M. & W. 107, 108 ; 4 Jur. 701 45, 46 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXXXIX 

PAGE 

Parmiter v. Parmiter (1860), IJ. & H. 135 ; 3 De G. F. & J. 461 ; 30 L. J. 

Ch. 508 ; 3 L. T. 799 712 

Parnell v. Wood, (1892) P. 137 ; 66 L. T. 670 ; 40 W. E. 664 1062 

Parr, He (1860), 29 L. J. P. & M. 70 708 

Parr (or Bosworth) v. Cotohett (1824), 1 Ph. Ev. 333 ; 3 St. Ev. 824 .... 451 

Parrott v. "Watts (1877), 47 L. J. C. P. 79 ; 37 L. T. 755 377 

Parry v. Fairhurst (1835), 2 C. M. & R. 196 187, 190, 194 

Parry ». May (1833), 1 M. & Rob. 279 ; 5 Tyr. 685 311 

Parry v. Nicholson (1845), 13 M. & W. 779 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 119 ; 2 Dowl. 

& L. 640 1192 

Parsona v. Brown (1852), 3 0. & K. 295 284 

Parsons v. Hancock (1829), M. & M. 330 553 

Parsons v. Hayward (1862), 31 L. J. Ch. 666 ; 4 De G. F. & J. 474; 8 Jur. 

N. S. 924 169 

Parsons v. Loyd (1772), 3 Wils. 341 83 

Parsons v. Purcell (1849), 12 Ir. L. R. 90 292 

Parsons v. Sexton (1847), 4 C. B. 908 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 181 777 

Parteriche v. Powlet (1742), 2 Atk. 383 743 

Parton v. Cole (1842), 6 Jur. 370 286, 287 

Parton «. Crofts (1864), 16 C. B. N. S. 11 ; 33 L. J. C. P. 189 ; 10 L. T. 

34 ; 12 "W. R. 553 297 

Partridge v. Coates (1824), Ry. & M. 156 ; 1 C. & P. 534 311 

Partridge v. Soott (1838), 3 M. & W. 220 ; 1 H. & H. 31 114, 115 

Partridge v. Usbome (1828), 6 Russ. 195 1123 

Paske V. Ollat (1815), 2 Phillim. 324 140 

Pasley v. Freeman (1789), 3 T. R. 51 ; 2 Sm. L. C. 74 ; 1 E. R. 634 . . . . 718 
Pater v. Baker (1847), 3 C. B. 831 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 124 ; U Jui-. 370 .... 189 
Patersouj>.Gandasequi(1812), 15East, 62; 2 Sm. L. C. 378 ; 13R.R.368.. 768 

Paterson v. Hardacre (1811), 4 Taun. 114 262 

Paton V. Sheppard (1839), 10 Sim. 186 146 

Patrick v. Shedden (1853), 2 E. & B. 14 1153 

Patriokson v. Patriclrson (1865), 35 L. J. P. & M. 48 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 86; 

12 Jur. N. S. 30 ; 13 L. T. 567 ; 14 W. R. 212 150 

Patten v. Poulton (1858), 1 S. & T. 55 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 341 ; 27 L. J. P. 41 . . 143 

Patterson v. Becher (1821), 6 Moore, C. P. 319 521 

Patterson v. Black (1780), cited 2 Park, Ins. 919, 920 173 

Pattinson v. Luckley (1876), L. R. 10 Ex. 330 ; 44 L. J. Ex. 180 ; 33 L. T. 

360 ; 24 W. R. 224 1197 

Pattonj;. Ash (1821), 7 Serg. &E. 116, 125 154 

Pattonv. Goldsborough (1822), 9 Serg. & E. 47 514 

Paul (;. Cleaver (1810), 2 Taun. 360; 11 E. E. 608 732 

Paul V. Meek (1828), 2 T. & J. 116 300 

Paul V. Eoy (1862), 21 L. J. Ch. 361 ; 15 Beav. 433 1153 

Pauling V. London & North Western Ey. Co. (1853), 8 Ex. 867 ; 23 L. J. 

Ex. 105 ; 7 EaUw. Cas. 816 641, 644, 647 

Paull V. Simpson (1846), 9 Q. B. 365 ; 15 L. J. Q. B. 382 663 

Pawseyj!. Armstrong (1881), 18Ch.D. 698; 60L. J. Ch. 683; SOW. E. 469. 159 

Paxton 1). Douglas (1809), 16 Ves. 242 970 

Paxton V. Douglas (1812), 19 Ves. 225 ; 12 E. R. 175 961, 962 

Paxton V. Popham (1814), 9 East, 419 91, 746 

Payne v. Barker (1659), Bridg. 18, 23, 26 6, 83 

Payne v. Ibbotson (1859), 27 L. J. Ex. 341 926, 927 

Payne v. Eogers (1785), 1 Doug. 407 487 

Payne v. Wilson (1895), 16 E. (April) 276 ; (1895) 1 Q. B. 653 ; 64 L. J. 

Q. B. 328; 72L. T. 110; 43 W. R. 250 Add. [116] 

Peaceable v. Watson (1811), 4 Taun. 16 ; 13 R. E. 662 444, 445 

Peacham's case (1616), 2 How. St. Tr. 870 673 

Peacock's Estate, Ee (1872), L. E. 14 Eq. 236 806 

Peacock v. BeU (1667), 1 Wms. Saunders, 75 20, 83 

Peacock v. Harper (1878), 47 L. J. Ch. 238 ; 7 Ch. D. 648 ; 38 L. T. 143 ; 

26 W. E. 109 274 

Peacock v. Harris (1808), 10 East, 104 ; 10 R. R. 231 519 

Peacock v. Harris (1836), 6 A. & E. 449 519 

Vol. J. ends with page 636. 



Cxl TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOH 

Peacock v. Monk (1748), 1 Ves. sen. 128 748 

Peacock v. Peacock (1809), 16 Ves. 49, 56 ; 10 E. R. 138 160 

Peacock v. Peacock (1859), 1 Sw. & Tr. 183 ; 27 L. J. Mat. 71 48 

Pearce v. Hooper (1810), 3 Taun. 60 1211 

Pearce v. Morrioe (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 396 ; 4 L. J. K. B. 21 ; 4N. & M. 48 300 

Pearce v. Ornsby (1835), 1 M. & Bob. 455 244 

Peardon?). Underbill (1850), 16Q. B. 120; 20 L. J. Q. B. 133; 15Jur.465.. 234 
Pearn, Re (1876), 45 L. J. P. D. & A. 31 ; 1 P. D. 70 ; 33 L. T. 705 ; 

24 W. B. 143 698 

Pears v. Laing (1871), 40 L. J. Ch. 225 ; L. B. 12 Eq. 41 ; 24 L. T. 19 ; 

19 W. B. 653 449, 720 

Pearae v. Coaker (1869), L. B. 4 Ex. 92 ; 38 L. J. Ex. 82 ; 20 L. T. 82 . . 1119 

Pearse v. Grrore (1747), 3 Atk. 523 537 

Pearse*. Pearse(1846), lDeG.&Sm.26; 16L. J. Cb. 153. .592, 593, 594, 601, 602 
Pearson i>. Att.-Gen. (see Be Perton). 

Pearson v. Pleteber (1803), 6 Esp. 90 598 

Pearson v. Isles (178 1), 2 Doug-. 556 834 

Pearson v. Le Maitre (1843), 6 Scott, N. B. 607 ; 5 M. & Gr. 700 ; 12 L. J. 

Q. B. 253 ; 7 Jut. 748 243, 244, 245 

Pearson v. Pearson (1872), 40 L. J. P. & M. 53 ; L. B. 2 P. & D. 451 ; 24 

L. T. 917; 19W. B. 1014 698 

Pearson v. Pearson (1884), 27 Cb. D. 149 ; 54 L. J. Ch. 37 ; 32 "W. B. 1006 754 
Pearson i>. Scott (1878), 47 L. J. Cb. 705 ; 9 Cb. D. 198 ; 38 L. T. 747 ; 

26 W. B. 796 157 

Pearson v. Sbaw (1844), 7 Ir. L. B. 1 16 

Pearson «>. Spencer (1863), 3 B. & S. 761 ; 8 L. T. 166 ; IIW. R. 471 115 

Pearsons, Be (1864), 33 L. J. P. & M. 177 697 

Peases-. Wells (1840), 8 Dowl. 626 732 

Peck, Re (1860), 29 L. J. P. & M. 95 ; 2 S. & T. 506 173 

Peck V. Peck (1870), 21 L. T. 670 ; 18 W. B. 295 929, 960 

Peokbam v. Potter (1824), 1 C. & P. 232 5U 

Pedler v. Paige (1833), 1 M. & Bob. 268 1209 

Pedley v. Dodds (1866), L. B. 2 Eq. 819 ; 14 L. T. 823 ; 14 W. B. 884 . . 803 

Pedley v. Wellesley (1829), 3 C. & P. 568 891 

Peek V. North Stafford By. Co. (1849, should be 1860), 29 L. J. Q. B. 97 • 

35 L. T. O. S. 407 ; 8 W. B. 364 675 

Peek V. North Stafford By. Co. (1858), 27 L. J. Q. B. 469 ; E. B. & E. 958.. 755 

Peeks). North Stafford By. Co. (1863), lOH.L. Cas. 473 ; 32L. J. Q. B. 241 723 

Peel's case (see Be Barned's Banking Co.). 

Peel, Re (1870), L. B. 2 P. & D. 46 ; 39 L. J. P. & M. 36 ; 22 L. T. 417. . 789 

Peerless, The (see Prowse v. European, &c. Shipping Co.). 

Peiroe v. Corf (1874), L. B. 9 Q. B. 210 ; 43 L. J. Q. B. 62 ; 29 L. T. 919 • 

22W. B. 299 673, 730 

Peisob 11. Dixon (1815), 1 Mason, 11 763 

Pejepscot Prop's ». Ransom (1817), 14 Mass. 146 " 122 

Pelham v. Pickersgill (1787), 1 T. B. 660 ; 1 B. B. 348 '..'..'. 124 

Pell V. Daubeny (1850), 3 Ex. 965 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 44 " " 820 

Pelletreau v. Jackson (1833), 11 Wend. 117 .".'.".'!!! 88 

Pembroke, Lady, Be (1856), Deane, Ecc. B. 182 ; 20 Jur. 626 ....!!"" 701 

Pender v. Eobes (1838), 1 Dev. & B. 250 \\\\ 757 

Pendleton v. Booth (1859), 1 Giff. 45 ; 29 L. J. Cb. 265 ; 5 Jur. n' S 840 497 

Pendrell v. Pendrell (1731), 2 Str. 924 417 

Penfold V. Abbott (1863), 32 L. J. Q. B. 67 ; 7 L. T. 384 ; 11 W. i?.."i69 "• 

9Jur. N. S. 617 773 

Penn v. Bibby (1867), 36 L. J. Ch. 455 ; L. B. 2 Cb. 127 ; 15 L." T "399 "• 

16 W. E. 208 1232 

Penn«. Jack (1866), L. B. 2 Eq. 314; 14 W. B. 760; 14 L.'T.'igs! ! .'! ." 272 

Pennefather v. Pennefather (1872), Ir. 6 Eq. 171 172 

Pennell v. Meyer (1838), 2 M. & Bob. 98 ; 8 C. & P. 470 481 

Pennimani). Hill (1875), 24 W. R. 245 917 

Penny I). Watts (1848-60), 2 DeG. & Sm. 501 97I 

Penrioe i>. Williams (1883), 23 Ch. D. 353 ; 52 L. J. Ch. 693 ; Vs l' T 

868 ; 31 W. R. 496 ' . . ' ijgg 

Xhe references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Cxli 

PAGH 

Penruddook v. Hammond (1847), 11 Beav. 59 601 

Pentreguinea Coal Co., He (1862), 4 De G. E. & J. 541 ; 31 L. J. Ch. 741 ; 

7 L. T. 84 ; 10 W. R. ti56 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 706 681 

People, The, ». Holbrook (1816), 13 Johns. 90 289 

People, The, v. Mather (1830), 4 "Wend. 229, 252—254 . .962, 964, 965, 968, 972 

People, The, v. Matteson (1827), 2 Cowen, 433, 573, n 903 

People, The, ex. rel. Ordronaux v. Chegaray (1836), 18 "Wend. 642 893 

People V. Bill (1813), 10 Johns. 95 883 

People V. Cannon (1893), 36 Am. St. R. 689 Add. [70] 

People V. Carlton (1894), 40 Am. St. E. 346 Add. [68] 

People V. Whipple (1827), 9 Cowen, 707 632 

Perohard v. Tindall (1795), 1 Esp. 394 509 

Peroival v. Oaney (1851), 4 De G. & Sm. 623 480 

Pereival v. Nanson (1851), 7 Ex. 3 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 1 435, 440, 458 

Perfect v. Lane (1861), 3 De G. P. & J. 369 ; 31 L. J. Ch. 489 ; 6L. T. 8 ; 

10 W. R. 197; 30 Beav. 187; 8 Jur. N. S. 547 137 

Perigal V. Nicholson (1810), "Wightw. 63 447 

Perkins v. Bradley (1842), 1 Hare, 219 ; 6 Jur. 254 135 

Perkins v. Vaughan (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 988 ; 5 Scott, N. R. 881 ; 12 L. J. 

C. P. 38; 6 Jur. 1114 243, 144 

Perring v. Hone (1826), 4 Bing. 28 ; 12 Moore, C. P. 13c ; 2 C. & P. 401 . . 1194 

Perry f. Davis (1858), 3 C. B. N. S. 769 524 

Perry v. Fisher (1846), Spring Assize, Surrey, 1816 194 

Perry f. Fitzhowe (1846), 8 Q.B. 757,778: 15 L. J. Q.B.239; lfljur.799.. 638 

Perry v. Gibson (1834), 1 A. & E. 48 ; 3 N. & M. 462 942 

Perry ». Meadowcroft (1846), 10 Beav. 122 1103, 1104, 1132 

Perry v. Phosphor Bronze Co. (1894), 71 L. T. 864 1062 

Perry «. Smith (1842), 9 M. &W. 682; 11 L. J. Ex. 269 602,603 

Perry D. Watts (1842), 3 M & Gr. 775 ; 11 L. J. C. P. 97 192 

Persse v. Persse (1856), 5 H. L. Cas. 671 867 

Perth Peerage (1846-8), 2 H. L. Cas. 265 403, 425, 1048 

Perton, Re, Pearson v. Att.-Gen. (1885), 53 L. T. 707 413, 415, 421, 435 

Peruvian Ry. Co. v. Thames and Mersey Marine Ins. Co. (1867), L. R. 

2 Ch. 617 ; 36 L. J. Ch. 864 ; 15 W. R. 1002 648 

Petch V. Lyon (1846), 9 Q. B. 147 ; 15 L. J. Q. B. 393 506 

Petchell, Re (1874), 43 L. J. P. & M. 22 ; L. R. 3 P. & D. 153 ; 30 L. T. 

74 ; 22 W. R. 353 704 

Peter v. Comptou (1693), Skin. 353 ; 1 Sm. L. C. 359 682 

Peters v. Brown (1801), 4 Esp. 46 713 

Peters v. Fleming (1840), 6 M. & W. 42 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 81 48, 49 

Petersfield case (1833), Cock. & Arm. 34 ; Perry & K. 49 497 

Petherhridge v. Ash (1846), 4 C. B. 74 ; 1 Lutw. Reg. Cas. 507 ; 10 Jur. 950 726 

Petherick v. Turner (1802), cited 1 Taun. 105 ; 9 R. R. 712 386, 495 

Peto V. Hague (1804), 5 Esp. 134 ; 1 Smith, 417 388 

Petrie v. Nuttall (1855), 11 Ex. 569 ; 25 L. J. Ex. 200 95, 405, 1116 

Petty V. Anderson (1825), 3 Bing. 170 504 

Petty V. Styward (1632), 1 Eq. Cas. Abr. 290 ; 1 Ch. Rep. 57 139 

Peyton v. M'Dermott (1837), 1 Dr. & Wal. 198 297 

Phayre, Lessee of, v. Fahy (1832), Hayes & Jon. 128 47 

Phelan ». Slattery (1887), 19 L. R. Ir. 177 793 

Phelps V. Foot (1815), 1 Conn. 387 372 

Phelps V. Prew (1854), 3 E. & B. 430 ; 2 C. L. R. 1422 ; 23 L. J. Q. B. 140 ; 

18 Jur. 249 321 

Phene's Trusts (1869), L. R. 5 Ch. App. 139 ; 39 L. J. Ch. 316 ; 22 L. T. 

Ill; 18 W. R. 303 172 

Phen6 v. Popplewell (1862), 31 L. J. C. P. 235 ; 12 C. B. N. S. 334 ; 

6 L. T. 247 ; 10 W. R. 523 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 1104 660 

Phenix v. Ingraham (1809), 5 Johns. 412 514 

Philadelphia and Trenton Ry. Co. v. Stimpsoa (1840), 14 Pet. 448 945 

Philimore v. Barry (1808), 1 Camp. 513 ; 10 R. R. 742 672 

Philips V. Hunter (1795), 2 H. Bl. 402 ; 4 T. R. 182 ; 2 R. R. 353 . . 1152, 1155 
Philips ». Philips (1878), 48 L. J. Q. B. 135 ; 4 Q. B. D. 127 ; 39 L. T. 
656 ; 27 W. R. 436 187, 220 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



Cxlii TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAOS 

Philipson v. Cliaae (1809), 2 Camp. Ill 316 

Philipson v. Earl of Egremont (1844); 6 Q. B. 605 ; 14 L. J. Q. B. 25; 

8 Jut. 1164 1132 

Phillips V. Barker (1854), 23 L. J. Ch. 44 ; 1 Sm. & G. 583 788 

Phillips V. Berriok (1819), 16 Johns. 136 1123 

Phillips V. Bistolli (1824), 2 B. & C. 514 ; 3 Dowl. & R. 822 689 

Phillips V. Briard (1856), 25 L. J. Ex. 233 ; 1 H. & N. 21 766 

PhOlips V. Bury (1788), 2 T. K. 346 1103 

Phillips V. Clagett (1843), 11 M. & "W. 84 ; 2 Dowl. 1004 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 275 492 
Phillips V. Cole (1839), 10 A. & E. 106 ; 2 P. & D. 289 ; 4 Jur. 83. .435, 444, 512 

PhUUps V. Earner (1796), 1 Esp. 357 942 

Phillips V. Evans (1843), 12 M. &"W. 309 ; 1 D. & L. 463 ; 13 L. J. Ex. 80.. 1160 
Phillips V. Gibhs (1846), 4 Dowl. & L. 275 ; 16 M. & W. 208 ; 16 L. J. 

Ex. 48 733 

Phillips V. Hall (1832), 8 Wend. 610 544 

Phillips V. HalUdav, (1891) A. C. 361 ; 64 L. T. 745 ; 55 J. P. 741 121 

Phfllips V. Henson(1877), 3 C. P. D. 26 ; 47 L. J. C. P. 273 ; 37 L.T. 432; 

26 W. R. 214 •. 723 

Phillips V. Im Thum (1866), 18 C. B. N. S. 400, 694 ; 35 L. J. 0. P. 220 ; 

L. E. 1 C. P. 463 ; 1 H. & R. 499 548 

Phillips V. Irving (1844), 7 M. & Gr. 326 ; 8 Soott, N. R. 3 ; 13 L. J. 

0. P. 145 38 

Phillips V. Kingfield (1841), 1 Applet. 375 972 

Phillips V. MuUings (1871), L. R. 7 Ch. 244 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 211 ; 20 W. R. 

29 137, 139 

PhiUips V. Phillips (1864), 34 Beav. 19 806 

Phillips «;. Pound (1852), 7 Ex. 881 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 277 ; 16 Jur. 645 865 

Phillips V. Ward (1863), 16 C. B. N. S. 717 ; 33 L. J. Ex. 7 ; 9 L. T 345; 

12 W. R. 106 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 1182 1115 

Phillips V. Winbum (1830), 4 C. & P. 273 679 

Phillipson v. Hayter (1870), 40 L. J. C. P. 14 ; L. R. 6 C. P. 38 ; 23 L. T. 

556 ; 19 W. R. 130 166 

Phillpotts V. PhUlpotts (1861), 10 C. B. 86 ; 20 L. J. C. P. 11 90 

Phipps ». Hale (1874), L. R. 3 P. & D. 166 700 

Phipps V. Parker (1808) 1 Camp. 412 1209 

Piokard». Sears (1837), 6 A. & E. 174 637, 542 

Pickering v. Appleby (1720-1), Com. R. 354 685 

Pickering v. Dowson (1813), 4 Taun. 779 767 

Pickering v. Noyes (1823), 1 B. & 0. 263 ; 2 D. &R. 386 321, 969 

Pickett V. Packham (1869), L. R. 4 Ch. App. 190 169 

Pickford v. Gutch (1787), 8 T. R. 305, n. (o) 161 

Pickup V. Thames Ins. Co. (1878), 3 Q. B. D. 604 ; 47 L. J. Q. B. 749 ; 

39 L. T. 341 ; 26 W. R. 689 176 

Pieton's case (1806), 30 How. St. Tr. 493 1093, 1179 

Piercy's case (1682), T. Jones, R. 164 1179 

Piers V. Piers (1849), 2 H. L. C. 331 ; 13 Jur. 669 149 

Pierson v. Hutchinson (1809), 2 Camp. 211 ; 6 Esp. 126 307 

Pigg«>. Clarke (1876), 46 L. J. Ch. 849 ; 3 Ch. D. 672 ; 24 W. R. 1014 .. 146 

Piggott V. Green (1833), 6 Sim. 72 144 

Pigot's case (1614), 11 Co. Rep. 27 1193, 1200, 1201 

Pigot V. Cubley (1864), 16 C. B. N. S. 701 ; 33 L. J. C. P. 134 ; 9 L. T. 

804 ; 12 W. R. 467 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 318 781 

Pigott V. HoUoway (1808), 1 Binn. 436 927 

Pike's case (1829), 3 C. & P. 698 898 

Pike V. Ongley (1887), 18 Q. B. D. 708 ; 66 L. J. Q. B. 373 ; 35 W. R. 

634 769 

PHgrim, Ee (1835), 3 A. & E. 485 ; 4 Dowl. 89 ; 4 L. J. M. C. 120. . . .838, 842 
Pilgrim v. Southampton & Dorchester Ry. Co. (1835), 18 L. J. C. P. 330 ; 

8 C. B. 25 476 

PilHngton v. RUey (1849), 6 Dowl. & L. 628 ; 3 Ex. 739 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 323 2?3 
Pillar V. Llynvi Coal Co. (1869), L. R. 4 C. P. 752 ; 38 L. J. C. P. 294 ; 

20L.T.923; 17 W. R. 1123 723 

Pilsworth V. Mosse (1862), 14 Ir. Ch. R. 163 704 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. cxliii 

FAQB 

Pim «». Cuirell (184(>5, 6 M. & "W. 234 393, 397, 404, 405, 406, liu9 

Pinches v. Harvey. (1841), 1 Q. B. 869 ; 1 G-. & D. 236; 10 L. J. Q. B. 316.. 734 

Pinney v. Jones (1894), 42 Am. St. E,. 209 Add. [376] 

Pinney v. Pinney (1828), 8 B. & C. 335 1046 

Pipe*. Pulcher (1858), 28L. J. Q. B. 12; 1 E. &E. m 403 

Piper V. Chappell (1845), 14 M. & W. 649 ; 9 Jur. 601 7 

Pitcher v. King' (1845), 2 Dowl. & L. 755 815, 816 

Pitman v. Maddox (1698), 2 Salk. 690 ; 2 Ld. Raym. 732 454 

Pitman v. Woodbury (1848), 3 Ex. 4 675 

Pitt V. Ohappelow (1841), 8 M. & W. 616 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 487 546 

Pitt V. Coomes (1834), 6 B. & Ad. 1078 ; 3 N. & M. 212 867 

Pitt V. Shew (1821), 4 B. & Aid. 206 37 

Pitton V. "Walter (1718), 1 Str. 162 1031, 1034, 1167 

Pitts 1). Beciett (1845), 13 M. & W. 746 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 358 297 

Pizarro, The (1817), 2 Wheat. 227, 241, 242, u. (c) 102, 108 

Plaoker v. Gonsalus (1815), 1 Serg. & B. 526 514 

Planche (Packer) v. Braham (1837), 8 C. & P. 68 ; 6 Scott, 242 ; 4 Bing. 

N. C. 17 ; 3 Hodges, 288 ; 1 Jur. 823 ' 50 

Plant V. M'Ewen (1823), 4 Conn. 544 : 495 

Plant V. Taylor (1863), 7 H. & N. 211 ; 31 L. J. Ex. 289 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 140 127 

416, 418 
Piatt V. Att.-Gen. of N. S. Wales (1878), 3 App. Cas. 336 ; 47 L. J. P. C. 

26; 38L. T. 74; 26 W. E,. 516 179 

Plaxton v. Dare (1829), 10 B. & C. 17 ; 5 M. & E,. 1 305, 396, 403 

Playne v. Scriven (1849), 7 Notes of Cas. (Ecc. & Mar.) 122 ; 1 Roberts. 772 694 

Plenty v. West (1845), 1 Roberts. 264 ; 22 L. J. Ch. 185 704 

Plevins v. Downing (1876), 1 C. P. D. 220 ; 45 L. J. C. P. 695 ; 35 L. T. 263 762 

PUmmer v. SeUs (1834), 3 N. & M. 422 604 

Plowes V. Bossey (1862), 2 Dr. & Sm. 145 ; 31 L. J. Ch. 681 ; 10 W. R. 

332 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 362 101, 621 

Plumerti. Brisoo (1847), 11 Q. B. 46 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 158; 12 Jur. 351. .148, 1213 

Plummer v. Woodbume (1825), 4 B. & C. 625 ; 7 Dowl. & R. 25 1142, 1 152 

Plunkett's Estate, Re (1861), 11 Ir. Ch. R. 361 798 

Plunkett 1). Cobbett (1804), 6 Eap. 136 243, 617 

Pooock V. Billing (1824), 2 Bing. 269 513 

Pooook V. Pickering (1852), 18 Q. B. 789 ; 21 L. J. Q. B. 365 733 

Podmore v. Whatton (1864), 3 S. & T. 449 ; 33 L. J. P. 143 ; 10 L. T. 

754 ; 13 W. R. 106 143, 307 

Pogson V. Thomas (1840), 6 Bing. N. C. 337 803 

Polden V. Bastard (1865), 4 B. & S. 258 ; 8 L. T. 535 ; 11 W. R. 778 ; 7 

B. & S. 130 ; 13 L. T. 441 115 

Pole V. Leask (1864), 33 L. J. Ch. 155 538 

Pole V. Rogers (1840), 2 M. & Rob. 287 259 

Polini V. Gray (1881), 12 Ch. D. 411 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 41 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 86 ; 

5 App. Cas. 623; 43 L. T. 209; 29 W. E. 217 ; 44 L. J. 812 458, 1092 

Pollack V. Pollack (1861), 30 L. J. P. & M. 183 ; 2 S. & T. 310 ; 4 L. T. 

N. S. 479 348 

Pollard 41. BeU(1800), 8 T. E. 434; 6 E. R. 404 1147, 1149 

Pollard V. Scott (1790), Pea. R. 19 404, 1168 

Pollock V. PoUook (1874), L. E. 18 Eq. 329 ; 22 W. R. 724 ; 30 L. T. 779 ; 

44 L. J. Ch. 168 139 

Pollock V. Stables (1848), 12 Q. B. 765 ; 6 Railw. Cas. 352 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 

352 : 12 Jur. 1043 157, 158 

Pollock V. Stacy (1847), 9 Q. B. 1033 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 133 ; 11 Jur. 267 . . 656 

Pollok V. M'Alpin (1851), 7 Moo. P. C. 0. 427 178 

Pomeroy v. Baddeley (1826), Ry. & M. 430 918 

Ponsford v. Swaine (1861), IJ. & H. 433 ; 4 L. T. 15 612 

Pontefraot, Ex parte (1843), 3 Q. B. 391 ; 7 Jur. 1086 1139 

Pontifex v. Bignold (1841), 3 M. & Gr. 63 ; 3 Scott, N. R. 390 ; 9 Dowl. 

P. C. 860 ; 10 L. J. C. P. 269 82 

Pool V. Bridges (1826), 4 Pick. 379 376 

Poole V. Dioaa (1835), 1 Bing. N. C. 653 ; 2 L. J. C. P. 47 ; 1 Sc. 600. .453, 454, 

467, 458, 459, 460 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



Cxliv TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAQE 

Poole V. Gould (1856), 25 L. J. Ex. 250 ; 1 H. & N. 99 873 

Poole V. Griffith (1865), 15 Ir. C. L. R. 239 1168 

Poole V. Hobbs (1839), 8 Dowl. 113 733 

Poole V. Huskinson (1843), 11 M. & W. 827 124 

Poole V. Palmer (1842), Car. & M. 69 474 

Poole V. Richardson (1807), 3 Mass. 330 931 

Poole V. Warren (1838), 8 A. & E. 588 ; 3 N. & P. 693 : 1210 

Pooley V. Driver (1876), 5 Ch. D. 458 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 466 ; 36 L. T. 79 ; 25 

W. R. 162 169 

Pooley V. Goodwin (1835), 4 A. & E. 94 ; 6 N. & M. 466 133 

Pooley V. Harradine (1857), 7 E. & B. 431 ; 26 L. J. Q. B. 156 ; 5 "W. R. 

405 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 488 758 

Pope 81. Andrews (1840), 9 C. & P. 564 606 

Pope V. Askew (1840), 1 Iredell, 16 1221 

Pople, Re, Ex parte Baker (1889), 40 Ch. D. 589 ; 58 L. J. Cb. 372 ; 60 

L. T. 668; 37W.R. 554 172 

Porter's Trusts, Re (1856), 25 L. J. Cb. 688 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 349 1054 

Porter, Re, Pearson v. Att.-Gen. (1885), 53 L. T. 707 421 

Porter v. Cooper (1834), 6 C. & P. 364 1031 

Porter v. Weston (1839), 5 Bing. N. C. 715 ; 8 Soott, 25 ; 3 Jur. 507 110 

Portland, D. of, v. Hill (1866), L. R. 2 Eq. 765 ; 36 L. J. Cb. 439 ; 12 Jur. 

N. S. 286 ; 16 W. R. 38 402 

Portmore, Ld. v. Taylor (1831), 4 Sim. 182 ; 9 L. J. Ch. 203 137 

Postletbwaite v. Freeland (1880), 5 App. Cas. 599 ; 49 L. J. Ex. 630 ; 42 

L. T. 846 ; 28 W. R. 833 163 

Postletbwaite ». Riokman (1889), 60 L. T. 514 ; 37 W. R. 200 ; 63 J. P. 357. 121 

Potez V. Glossop (1848), 2 Ex. 191 146, 450 

Potbonier v. Dawson (1816), Holt, N. P. R. 383 ; 17 R. R. 647 781 

Pott ». Eyton (1846), 3 C. B. 32 ; 15 L. J. C. P. 257 159 

Pott V. Todhunter (1845), 2 Coll. 76 748 

Potter V. Baker (1850), 13 Beav. 273 ; 21 L. Cb. 11 ; 15 Beav. 489 144 

Potter V. Deboos (1815), 1 Stark. R. 82 153 

Potter V. Duffleld (1874), L. R. 18 Eq. 4 ; 43 L. J. Ch. 472 ; 22 W. R. 585. 671 
Potter V. Nicholson (1841), 8 M. & W. 294 ; 9 Dowl. 808 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 

Oil 733 

Potter J.'ilantin' (1870)', L. R.' 5 C.p! Sl's';' "I's W. R. "868 '...'.'.'.'.'..'...'.'. 818 

Potter V. Webb (1829), 6 Greenl. 44 252 

Potts V. Duramt (1795), 3 Anstr. 789, 795 ; 2 Eag. & T. 432 ; 3 GwiU. 1450 ; 

4 R. R. 864 430 

Potts V. Nixon (1870), 5 Ir. R. C. L. 45 89, 92 

Potts V. Smith (1869), 38 L. J. Ch. 68 ; L. R. 6 Eq. 311 ; 18 L. T. 629 ; 

16 W. R. 891 76 

Potts V. Surr (1865), 34 Beav. 543 ; 13 W. R. 909 136 

Poulsum V. Thirst (1867), L. R. 2 C. P. 449 ; 36 L. J. C. P. 225 ; 16 L. T. 

324 ; 15 W. R. 766 227 

Poxdtney v. Holmes (1733-4), 1 Str. 405 666 

Poulton V. Lond. & S. West. Ry. Co. (1867), L. R. 2 Q. B. 634 ; 36 L. J. 

Q. B. 294; 8 B. & S. 616 643 

Pound V. Wilson (1865), 4 F. & P. 301 938 

Pounsett ». Fuller (1856), 17 0. B. 660 ; 25 L. J. C. P. 145 773 

Pountney v. Clayton (1883), 11 Q. B. D. 820 ; 62 L. J. Q. B. 666 ; 49 L. T. 

283 ; 31 W. R. 664 ; 47 J. P. 788 114 

Powell, Re (1864), 34 L. J. P. & M. 107 ; 4 S. & T. 34 699 

Powell V. Bradbury (1849), 7 C. B. 201 ; 18 L. J. C. P. 116 ; 13 Jur. 349. 202 

Powell !). Dillon (1814), 2 BaU & B. 420 671 

PowelU. Divett (1812), 16 East, 29 ; 13 R. R. 358 1193, 1195 

Powell V. Edmunds (1810), 12 East, 6 ; 13 R. R. 785 757 

Powell V. Ford (1817), 2 Stark. R. 164 1220 

Powell ». Hellioar (1858), 26 Beav. 261 ; 28 L. J. Ch. 266 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 232. 638 

Powell V. Hodgetts (1826), 2 C. & P. 432 385 

Powell V. Jessop (1856), 18 C. B. 336 ; 25 L. J. C. P. 199 683 

PowelU. Layton(1806), 2Bn8. &P. 371; 9R. R. 660 1097 

PoweU 1). Miibum (1772), 3 WUs. 365, 366 103 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Cxlv 

PAOB 

Powell V. Powell (1866), 35 L. J. P. & M. 100 ; L. E. 1 P. & D. 209 ; 14 

L. T. 800 703 

Powell V. Smith (1872), 41 L. J. Ch. 734 ; L. R. 14 Eq. 85 ; 20 W. K. 602. 79 

Power V. Keeyes (1864), 10 H. of L. Cas. 645 86 

Power V. "Webber (1876), I. R. 10 Eq. 188 830 

Powers V. Balhurst (1880), 49 L. J. Ch. 294 ; 42 L. T. 123 ; 28 W. R. 390. 124 

Powis Barony (1731), cited Cruise, Dign. o. 6, s. 60 1040 

Powist). Smith (1822), 5 B. & A. 850 ; ID. &R. 490 39 

Powys V. Mansfield (1836-7). 3 My. & Or. 359 ; 7 L. J. Ch. 9 666 

Prance ». Sympson (1854), Kay, 678 710, 711 

Praslin, Duo de, case of, 7 Law Rev. Art. vii 574 

Pratt, Ex parte, Re Haymaa (1882), 21 Ch. D. 493 ; 52 L. Ch. 120 ; 47 

L. T. 368 ; 31 W. R. 189 848 

Pratt V. Hanbury (1849), 14 Q. B. 190 ; 19 L. J. Q. B. 17; 13 Jur. 1003. . 189 
Pratt ». Pratt (1882), 61 L. J. Ch. 838 ; 47 L. T. 249 ; 30 W. R. 837 . . 321, 1182, 

1184 

Presoott V. BufPery (1845), 1 0. B. 41 1174 

President, The (1804), 5 0. Rob. Adm. 277 179 

Preston v. Carr (1826), 1 Y. & J. 175 601 

Preston v. Meroeau (1775), 2 W. Bl. 1249 743, 757 

Preston v. Peeke (1858), 27 L. J. Q. B. 424 ; E. B. & E. 336 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 

613 84, 1123 

Preatwiok v. Poley (1865), 34 L. J. C. P. 189 ; 18 C. B. N. S. 806 ; 12 L. T. 

390; 13 W. R. 763; llJur. N. S. 583 608 

Price, Re (1804), 4 East, 587 ; 1 Smith, 284 ; 7 R. R. 637 838, 842 

Prices. Carter (1846), 7 Q. B. 838 732, 734 

Price ». Dewhurst (1838), 8 Sim. 302 1142, 1147, 1161 

Price ». Dyer (1810), 17 Ves. 356 ; 11 R. R. 102 732 

Price V. Harwood (1811), 3 Camp. 108 643 

Price t). Hewett (1852), 8 Ex. 146; 17 Jur. 4 541 

Price V. Hollis (1813), 1 M. & Sel. 105 499 

Prices. Ley (1863), 4 GifB. 235; 32 L. J. Ch. 530 748 

Price V. Littlewood (1812), 3 Camp. 288 1174 

Price V. Manning (1889), 42 Ch. D. 372 ; 58 L. J. Ch. 649 ; 61 L. T. 537 ; 

37 "W. R. 786 921, 939 

Price V. Powell (1858), 3 H. & N. 341 ; 27 L. J. Ex. 409 706 

Price «. Price (1852), 1 De G. M. & G. 308 ; 21 L. J. Ch. 53 137 

Price V. Price (1847), 16 M. & W. 230 ; 4 Dowl. & L. 637 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 99 . . 168 

Price V. Ramsay (1840), 2 Jebb & Sy. 338 525 

Price V. Richardson (1845), 15 M. & W. 540 ; 15 L. J. Ex. 345 669 

Price V. Torrington (1703), 1 Salk. 285 ; 2 Ld. Raym. 873 ; 1 Sm. L. C. 352.. 454, 

458 

Price V. Woodhouse (1849), 3 Ex. 616 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 271 407 

Price V. Worwood (1859), 4 H. & N. 512 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 329 522 

Price V. Wright (1779), 1 Dougl. 241* 696 

Prichard v. Powell (1845), 10 Q. B. 589 ; 15 L. J. Q. B. 166 396, 398, 399 

Prideaux v. Bunnett (1857), 1 C. B. N. S. 613 777 

Prideaux v. Criddle (1869), L. R. 4 Q. B. 455 ; 38 L. J. Q. B. 232 ; 20 L. T. 

695 ; 10 B. & S. 616 32 

Priestley v. Fowler (1837), 3 M. & W. 1 ; M. & H. 305 ; 1 Jur. 987 778 

Priestman ». Thomas (1884), 9 P. D. 70 ; 53 L. J. P. D. & A. 58 ; 32 W. R. 

842 1118 

Prince v. Blackburn (1802), 2 East, 250 1213 

Prince v. Samo (1838), 7 A. & E. 630 ; 7 L. J. Q. B. 123 ; 3 N. & P. 139 . . 480, 

484, 561, 970 
Prince Peter Oldenburg, Re (1884), 63 L. J. P. D. & A. 46 ; 9 P. D. 234 ; 

32 W. R. 724 ; 49 J. P. 104 1178 

Prince of Wales Life Ass. Co. v. Harding (1868), 27 L. J. Q. B. 297 ; E. B. 

& E. 183 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 851 642 

Princess Charlotte, The (1863), Brown. & L. 75 1175 

Princeton, The (1878), 47 L. J. Adm. 33 ; 3 P. D. 90 ; 38 L. T. 260 178 

Prinsep & E. India Co. -v. Dyce Sombre (1832, should be 1856), 10 Moo. 

P.O. C. 286 140, 170, 263, 1102 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



Cxlvi TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOE 

Pristwioh V. Poley (1865), 34 L. J. C. P. 189 ; 18 C. B. N. S. 806 ; 12 L. T. 

390 ; 13 W. R. 753 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 583 508 

Pritchard v. Bagshawe (1851), 11 C. B. 469 ; 20 L. J. C. P. Iril 500 

Pritchard v. Brown (1828), 4 New Hamps. 397 667 

Pritchard v. Draper (1830-31), 1 Euss. & My. 191 386, 495 

Pritchard v. Eoulkes (1837), ^ioop- (C. P.) 14 607 

Pritchard v. Hitchcock (1843), 6 M. & Gr. 166 ; 12 L. J. C. P. 322 . . 1096, 1097 

Pritchard v. Walker (1827), 3 0. & P. 212 148, 519 

Pritt V. Farrolough (1812), 3 Camp. 305 ; 13 K. R. 811 157, 464 

Proo.-Gen. v. Wmiams (1861), 31 L. J. P. & M. 157 ; 2 S. & T. 491 . .414, 416 

Proctor V. Jones (1826), 2 C. & P. 532 690 

Proctor V. Lainson (1836), 7 C. & P. 631 329, 496 

Prole V. Wiggins (1837), 3 Bing. N. C. 235 ; 3 Scott, 607 ; 2 Hodges, 204. .90, 91 

Prosser v. Gwillim (1843), 1 C. & K. 96 612 

Prosserr. Wagner (1856), 1 C. B. N. S. 289; 26L. J. C. P. 81 1103 

Protector, The (1839), 1 W. Rob. Adm. 45 178 

Proudfoot V. Montefiore (1867), L. E. 2 Q, B. 611 ; 8 B. & S. 610 ; 16 L. T. 

585; 16 W. E. 920; 36 L. J. Q. B. 226 686, 770 

Provis V. Eeed (1829), 5 Bing. 435 ; 3 M. & P. 4 977 

Prowse V. The European & American Steam Shipping Co. (1860), 13 Moo. 

P. C. E. 484, sub nom. The Peerless ; Lush. Adm. E. 103 ; 30 L. J. 

Adm. 89 7, 178 

Prudential Ass. Co. v. Edmonds (1877), 2 App. Cas. 487 172 

Prudential Mutual Ass. Co. v. Curzou (1852), 8 Ex. 97 ; 22 L. J. Ex 85. . 1164 
Prudhamt;. PhilUps (1737), 2 Amb. 763 ; 20 How. St. Tr. 479, 480, n. . . 1106, 

1133 

Prudhomme v. Fraser (1834), 1 M. & Rob. 435 192 

Pruenj;. Cox(1845), 2 0. B. 1; 15 L. J. C. P. 17; 1 Barr. & Ar. 514. . .. 726 

Pryor v. Pryor (1860), 29 L. J. P. & M. 114 700 

Pryor ». Swaine (1844), 2 Dowl. & L. 37 732 

Puddephatt, Ee (1870), L. E. 2 P. & D. 97 ; 39 L. J. P. & M. 84 699 

Pagh & Sharman's case (1872), L. E. 13 Eq. 566 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 680 ; 

26 L. T. 274 846 

Pugh ». Eobinson (1786), 1 T. E. 118 19 

Puiolas V. Holland (1841), Ir, Cir. E. 19 25-t 

Puibrook V. Lawes (1876), 45 L. J. Q. B. 178 ; 1 Q. B. D. 284 ; 34 L. T. 96.. 688 
Pullen V. Snelus (1879), 48 L. J. 0. P. 394 ; 40 L. T. 363 ; 27 W. E. 634. , 224 

PuUen V. White (1828), 3 C. & P. 434 273 

Pulley V. Hilton (1823), 12 Price, 625 1050 

Pulsford ». Richards (1853), 17 Beav. 87 ; 22 L. J. Ch. 659 539 

Purcell V. Macnamara (1808), 1 Camp. 200 ; 9 East, 157, 361 ; 9 R. R. 578.. 1013, 

1096 

Purdon v. Ld. Longford (1877), 11 Ir. E. C. L. 267 48 

Purdonv. Purdon(1842), lOM. & W. 562 ; 12L. J. Ex. 3 716 

Putnam v. Lewis (1811), 8 Johns. 389 652 

Pye V. Butterfield (1865), 34 L. J. Q. B. 17 ; 5 B. & S. 829 960 

Pyerj). Carter (1866), 1 H. &N. 916; 26 L. J. Ex. 258 115 

Pyke V. Crouch (1696), 1 Ld. Eaym. 730 324, 328, 1113 

Pym V. CampbeU (1856), 26 L. J. Q. B. 277 ; 6 E. & B. 370 ; 27 L. T. 122 ; 

4 W.E. 628; 20 Jut. 641 746 

Pym V. Lockyer (1840), 6 My. & Cr. 29 ; 10 L. J. Ch. 153 806 

Pyne, Re (1843), 1 Dowl. & L. 703 ; 13 L. J. Q. B. 37 816 

QUAETEBMAN ». Cox (1837), 8 C. & P. 97 910 

Quartz Hill Co., Ee, Ex parte Young (1882), 21 Ch. D. 642 ; 61 L. J. Ch. 

940 ; 31 W. E. 173 912, 942 

Quebec Marine Ins. Co. v. Commer. Bk. of Canada (1870), L.E. 3 P.O. 234 ; 

39 L. J. P. 0. 53 770 

Queen, The (1869), L. E. 2 Adm. 354 ; 38 L. J. Adm. 39 ; 4 Moo. P. C. 0. 

N. S. 336 177 

Queen, The, v. Flavell (1884), 14 Q. B. D. 364 ; 62 L. T. 133 ; 33 W. E. 

343 ; 49 J. P. 406 695 

The refcrenais are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OP CASES CITED. cxlvii 

PAGE 

Queen's, The, case (1820), 2 B. & B. 287 . . . .280, 281, 484, 561, 587, 901, 904, 

906, 950, 954, 955, 959, 974, 975, 977 
Queen's Proctor v. Ery (1879), 4 P. D. 230 ; 48 L. J. P. D. & A. 68.. 1050, 1054 

QuenneU v. Turner (1851), 13 Beav. 240 ; 20 L. J. Oh. 237 802, 804 

Quick V. Quick (1864), 33 L. J. P. & M. 146 ; 2 S. & T. 442 ; 12 W. E. 

119; 10 Jur. N. S. 682 143 

Qmck V. Staines (1798), 1 Bos. & P. 203 ; 4 E. E,. 801 , 650 

Quilter V. Joras (1853, should be 1863), 14 C. B. N. S. 747 ; II "W. E. 888 ; 

3 F.& F. 644 309 

Quincey v. Sharpe (1876), 1 Ex. D. 72 ; 45 L. J. Ex. 347 ; 34 L. T. 495 ; 

24W. E. 373 711 

Quinn v. Butler (1868), L. E. 6 Eq. 225 708 

E.'b Trusts, Ee (1870), 39 L. J. Ch. 192 621 

E. V. (1826), 2 0. & P. 459 120 

E. ff. (1834), 6 C. & P. 408 216 

E. V. (1838), 3N. &P. 627; 8 A. & E. 589 824 

E. V. Abergavenny Union (1880), 6 Q. B. D. 31 ; 50 L. J. M. 0. 1 ; 43 

L. T. 602 ; 29 W. E. 303 631 

E. V. AbergwiUy (1807, should be 1801), 2 East, 63 368, 420, 465 

E. v. Abingdon (1794), Pea. E. 236 274 

E. «. Ackroyd (1824), 1 Lew. 0. 0. 49 671 

E. !>. Adams (1828), 3 0. & P. 600 120 

E. V. Adderbury East (1843), 5 Q. B. 187, 189, n. (a) ; 13 L. J. M. 0. 9 ; 

D. & M. 324 ; 7 Jur. 1035 494 

E.». Addis (1834), 6 0. & P. 388 634 

E. ,;. Adey (1831), 1 M. & Rob. 94 969 

E. i>. Aickles (1784), 1 Lea. 294, 297, n., 300, n. (a) ; 2 East, P. 0. 968 .. 289, 

318, 1050, 1172 
E. V. AUen (1826), 1 Den. C. C. 364 ; T. & M. 56 ; 2 C. & K. 869 ; 3 Cox, 

C. 0. 270 ; 18 L. J. M. 0. 72 ; 13 Jur. 108 100, 263, 278 

E. V. Allen (1872), L. E. 1 C. 0. 367 ; 41 L. J. M. 0. 97 ;■ 12 Cox, C. C. 

193 149 

E. V. AUgood (i7P8J,"7 t! E." 'uG- V E.' eV 574 ." .' ". '. '. '. .... '. '..".'!!'.".'.!!!! .' 994 

E. V. Allison (1806), E. & E. 109 130, 295 

E. V. All Saints (1828), 7 B. & 0. 789 416 

E. V. All Saints, Southampton (1828), 7 B. & 0. 790 132, 1137 

E. V. All Saints, Worcester (1817), 6 M. & Sel. 194 891, 892, 960 

E. ». Almon (1770), 6 Burr. 2686 107 

E. V. Ambergate, &o. Ey. Co. (1852), 17 Q. B. 957 ; 16 Jur. 777 998 

E. V. Ambnry (1852), 6 Cox, 0. 0. 79 826 

E. ». Anderson (1680), 7 How. St. Tr. 874 899 

E. V. Anderson (1868), 11 Cox, C. C. 134 1029 

E. V. Andrews (1837), 2 M. & Eob. 37 209 

E. V. Antrobus (1835), 2 A. & E. 793 ; 1 H. & W. 96 ; '6 0. & P. 784 ; 

4 N. & M. 565 397 

E. V. Appleby (1821), 3 Stark. E. 33 628, 587 

E. V. Archer (1826), 1 Moo. 0. C. 143 165 

E. 1). Armitage (1872), L. E. 7 Q. B. 773; 42L. J. M. 0. 16 630 

E. v. Arnold (1838), 8 C. & P. 622 570, 576 

E. V. Arundel (1721), Hob. 109 108 

E. V. Ashburton (1846), 8 Q. B. 876 ] 33 

E. V. Ashtou (1837), 2 Lew. 0. C. 147 470 

E. V. Aspinall (1827), cited 3 St. Evid. 952 257 

E. V. Aspinall (1876), 46 L. J. M. 0. 146 ; 2 Q. B. D. 48 ; 36 L. T. 297 ; 

26 W. E. 283 84 

E. V. Aston (1838), 2 Euss. 0. & M. 732 246 

R. V. Atkins (1679), 7 How. St. Tr. 728 518 

E. V. Atwood (1789), 1 Lea. 0. 0. 464 633 

E. V. Austin (1856), Dears. C. C. 612 ; 7 Cox, 0. 0. 55 ; 25 L. J. M. 0. 

48 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 95 328 

n.v. Avery (1838), 8 0. & P. 696 592, 602, 604 

E. V. Azire (1737-8), 1 Str. 633 893 

Vol. I. end6 with page 635. 



Cxlviii TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAGK 

E. •«. Babb{1790), 3 T. R. 581 991, 997 

R. V. Bagshaw (1797), 7 T. R. 363 1137 

R. u. Baines (1706), 2 Ld. Raym. 1199, 1265 131 

R. V. Baker (1837), 2 M. & Rob. 53 465 

R. V. Baker (1895), 15 R. (May), 380 ; (1895) 1 Q. B. 797 ; 64 L. J. M. C. 

177 ; 72 L. T. 631 Add. [47, 948] 

R. *. Baldry (1852), 2 Den. C. 0. 430 563, 572 

R. V. Ball (1807), 1 Camp. 324 ; R. & R. 132 ; 10 R. R. 695 246 

R. V. Ball (1837), 8 C. & P. 745 921 

R. V. Balls (1871), 40 L. J. M. C. 148 ; L. R. 1 C. C. 328 ; 12 Cox, C. C. 

96 ; 24 L. T. 760 ; 19 W. R. 876 239 

R. V. Banks (1794), 1 Esp. 146 ; 5 R. R. 726 264 

R. V. Bannam (1839), 1 Crawf. & D. C. C. 117 214 

R. V. Barker (1829), 3 C. & P. 589 257 

R. V. Barker (1858), 1 F. & E. 326 312 

R. V. Barnard (1823), 1 C. & P. 88 633, 947 

R. V. Barnes (1816), 1 Stark. 243 520, 1046 

R. V. Barnes (1835), 7 C. & P. 166 826 

B. V. Barnes (1856), L. R. 1 C. C. 45 ; 35 L. J. M. C. 204 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 

549 ; 14 L. T. 601 ; 14 W. R. 805 198 

R. V. Barnett (1829), 3 C. & P. 600 829 

R. V. Bamsley (1813), 1 M. & Sel. 377 521 

R. f. Barrett (1833), 6 C. & P. 124 148, 518 

R. i>. Barrett (1852), 6 Cox, C. C. 78 826 

R. V. Barrow (1866), 10 Cox, C. C. 407 275 

E. V. Barry (1865), 4 F. & P. 392 238 

R. V. Bartlett (1837), 7 C. & P. 832 569, 587 

R. V. Barton (1854), Dears. 284 12 1 

R. V. Basingstoke (1851), 14 Q. B. 611 ; 19 L. J. M. C. 28 ; 3 New Sess. 

Cas. 693 ; 6 D. & L. 303 291 

R. ». Bate (1871), 11 Cox, C. C. 686 572 

R. V. Bateman (1866), 4 F. & F. 1068 583 

R. u. Bates (1860), 2 F. & F. 317 335 

R. i>. Bathwiok (1832), 2 B. & Ad. 648 87, 890, 891, 892 

R. V. Bayley (1835), 7 C. & P. 264 217 

R. ». Beale (1866), L. R. 1 C. C. 10 ; 35 L. J. M. C. 60 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 12 ; 

13L. T. 335; 14 W. R. 57 ; 10 Cox, C. C. 157 100 

R. ■„. Beaney (1820), R. & R. 416 16, 205 

R. V. Beard (1837), 8 C. & P. 143, 148, 149 80,110 

R. V. Beardsall (1876), 1 Q. B. D. 452 ; 45 L. J. M. C. 157 1173 

R. V. Beckwith (1858\ 7 Cox. C. C. 505 275 

R. V. Bedfordshire (1855), 4 B. & B. .542 393, 399 

R. V. Bedingfield (1879), 14 Cox, C. C. 341 377, 467 

R. V. Bedingham (1844), 1 New Sess. Cas. 144 621 

R. V. Beeston (1855), 24 L. J. M. C. 5 ; Dears. C. C. 405 ; 3 C. L. R. 82 ; 

18 Jur. 1058 ; 326, 327, 335, 337 

R. V. Beeton (1849), 1 Den. 414 239 

R. V. Beezley (1830), 4 C. & P. 220 943 

R. V. Bell (1831), 5 C. & P. 162 680 

R. V. Bellamy (18i4), Ry. & M. 171 1031 

R. V. Benson (1810), 2 Camp. 508 129, 278, 1013 

R. V. Bentley (1833), 6C. & P. 148 580 

R. V. Berenger (1817), 2 Stnrk. R. 129, n 921 

R. 1). Berigan (1841), Ir. Cir. R. 177 669, 1130 

R. V. Bemadotti (1869), 11 Cox, C. C. 316 468 

R. i>. Berriman (1833), 5 C. & P. 601 216 

R. V. Berry (1859), Bell, C. C. 46 884 

R. V. Berry (1876), 1 Q. B. D. 447 ; 45 L. J. M. C. 123 897 

R. V. Betts (1850), 16 Q. B. 1022 ; 4 Cox, C. C. 211 ; 19 L. J. Q. B. 601 . . 47 

R. V. Beverley (1839), 8 Dowl. 140 994 

R. «). Bigg (1717), 3P. Wms. 423 640 

R. V. Bignold (1824), Dowl. & R. N. P. 59 ; 4 Dowl. & R. 70 274 

R. V. Bingham (1829), 3 T. & J. 109 1013 

R. V. Bingley (1833). 5 C. & P. 602 211 

R. V. Birch (1842), 3 Q. B. 431 1031 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. Cxlix 

FAOB 

R. V. Bird (1851), 2 Den. 94 ; T. & M. 437; 5 Cox, C. C. II ; 20 L. J. 

M. C. 70 ; 16 Jnr. 193 206 

R. V. Birdseye (1830), 4 0. & P. 386 238 

R. V. Birmingliam (undated), cited in Hubb. on Ev. of Suco. 660 417 

R. V. Birmingham (1861), 31 L. J. M. C. 63 ; 1 B. & S. 763 436, 444, 445 

R. ». Biss (1838), 8 C. & P. 773 216 

R. V. Bjornsen (1865;, 1 L. & C. 545 ; 10 Cox, C. C. 74 ; 34 L. J. M. C. 

180; 12 L. T. 473; 13 "W. R. 664; 11 Jur. N. S. 589 106, 129, 1175 

R. V. Blackburn (1853), 6 Cox, C. C. 339 ; 3 0. & K. 330 273, 569, 572 

R. V. Blake (1832), 4 B. & Ad. 365 ; 2 N. & M. 312 870 

R. V. Blake (1844), 6 Q. B. 126 ; 13 L. J. M. C. 131 ; 8 Jur. 666 382, 384 

R. ./. Blakemore (1852), 2 Den. 410 ; 21 L. J. M. C. 60 ; 16 Jur. 154. .89, 1102, 

1110, 1114 

R. „. Bland (1832), ] Lew. C. C. 149 217 

R. V. Blandy (1752), 18 How. St. Tr. 1187 65, 374, 469 

R. V. Bleasdale (1848), 2 C. & K. 765 236 

R. V. Bliss (1837), 7 A. & E. 655 ; 7 L. J. Q. B. 4 . . . . 396, 397, 400, 401 , 402, 446 

R. x/. Bodle (1833), 6 C. & P. 186 943 

R. V. Bodmin, JJ. of, (1892) 2 Q,. B. 21 ; 61 L. J. M. C. 151 ; 66 L. T. 

562 ; 40 W. R. 606 ; 56 J. P. 504 998 

R. ». Bolton (1841), 1 Q. B. 74; 4 P. & D. 679; 5 Jur. 1154 1100, 1136 

R. ■«. Bond (1850), 4 Cox, C. C. 236 ; 19 L.J.M.C. 138; 1 Den. C.C. 617. .678,579 

R. V. Bonner (1834), 6 C. & P. 386 467, 468 

R. ». Borrett (1833), 6 C. & P. 124 148, 618 

R. V. Boawell (1842), C. & Marsh. 584 669, 572 

R. V. Boucher (1859), 1 F. & F. 486 312 

R. «i. Boulter (1852), 2 Den. C. C. 396; 3 C. & K. 236; 21L. J. M. C. 67.. 627 
R. V. Bowden (1869), Liverpool Assizes, Deo. MS. (Mr. 0. H. Hopwood). 668 

R. V. Bowen (1841), 0. & Marsh. 149 82 

R. V. Bowen (1849), 13 Q. B. 790 ; 19 L. J. M. C. 65 ; 13 Jur. 1045 ; 3 

Cox, C. C. 483 84 

R. «!. Bowman (1834), 6 C. & P. 342' 1133, 1140 

R. ■•/. Boyes (1860), 2 F. & F. 158 970 

R. ■„. Boyes (1861), 30 L. J. Q. B. 302 ; 1 B. & S. 311 633,960, 964,965,966 

R. ■„. Bradlaugh (1883), 47 L. T. 477 ; 31 W. R. 229 ; 16 Cox, C. C. 217 ... . 884 

R. ■„. Braintree (1869), 28 L. J. M. C. 1 ; 1 E. & E. 51 304 

R. V. Braithwaite (1859), 8 Cox, C. C. 264, 444 ; 1 F. & F. 638 627 

R. V. Biaithwaite (1864), 8 Cox, C. C. 254, 444 627 

R. V. Bramley (1795), 6 T. R. 330 621, 890 

R. V. Brandreth (1817), 32 How. St. Tr. 867 383 

R. V. Brangan (1742), 1 Lea. C. C. 27 987 

R. «. Brasier (1779), 1 Lea. 199 ; 1 East, P. C. 443 367, 898 

R. V. Braynell (1850), 4 Cox, C. C. 404 683 

R. V. Brecknock and Aberg. Can. Co. (1836), 3 A. & E. 222 998 

R. ». Brennan (18j3), 3 Craw. & D. C. C. 109 318 

R. V. Brettell (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 424 ; 1 L. J. M. C. 46 60 

R. V. Brewer (1834), 6 C. & P. 363 601 

R. V. Brewer (1863), 9 Cox, C. C. 409 968 

R. V. Brice (1819), 2 B. & Aid. 606 909 

R. V. Briggs (1839), 2 M. & Rob. 199 241 

R. V. Brightside Bierlow (1849), 13 Q. B. 933 ; 19 L. J. M. C. 50 ; 4 New 

Sesa. C. 47 ; 14 Jur. 174 234, 405 

R. V. Bri8by(1849), lDen.C.C.416; 2Car. &K. 962; 18 L. J. M. C. 157.. 1160 

R. V. Bristol & Exeter Ry. Co. (1843), 4 Q. B. 162; 12 L. J. Q. B. 106 998 

R. V. Brittleton and Bates (1884), 12 Q. B. D. 266 ; 63 L. J. M. C. 83 ; 50 
L. T. 276 ; 32 "W. R. 463 ; 48 J. P. 295 ; 15 Cox, C. C. 431 . .165, 894, 1231 

R. V. Britton (1833), 1 M. & Rob. 297 683 

R. V. Broadhempston (1859), 28 h. J. M. C. 18 ; 1 E. & E. 154 ; 6 Jur. 

N. S. 267 131 

R. V. Brogan (1834), 3 Rues. C. & M. (4th ed.) 463; Roscoe, Cr. Ev. 60 . . 577 

R. V. Brommich (1679), 7 How. St. Tr. 722 518 

R. V. Brooke (1819), 2 Stark. R. 472; 20 R. R. 723 942 

R. V. Brookes (1847), C. & Marsh. 543 205 

R. V. Brooks (1847), 2 C. & K. 402 ; 1 Den. C. C. 217 78 

Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



Cl TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAGE 

B,. V. Brooks (1S53), Dears. C. C. 184 ; 6 Cox, C. C. 14S : 22 L. J. M. 0. 

121 ; 17 Jur. 400 165 

R. V. Brown (1779), 1 Cowp. 110 123 

R. V. Brown (1828), M. & M. 164 16 

R. V. Brown (1861), 2 F. & F. 559 247 

R. V. Brown (1862), 9 Cox, C. C. 281 604 

R. «. Brown (1867), 36 L. J. M. C. 59 ; L. R. 1 C. C. 70 972 

■ R. V. Browne (1829), M. & M. 319 ; 3 C. & P. 572 283, 1033, 1034 

R. V. BrowneU (1834), 1 A. & E. 598 ; 3 L. J. M. C. 118 833 

R. V. Bryan (1834), Jebb, 0. C. 157 667 

R. V. Buckingham, JJ. (1828), 8 B. & C. 375 996, 997 

R. V. Buckingliamshire JJ. (1843), 3 Q. B. 809 ; 2 a. & D. 660 ; 12 L. J. 

M. C. 29 1100, 1136 

R. V. Buckley (1873\ 13 Cox, C. C. 293 326,436,455 

R. 4). Budd (1805), 6 Esp. 230 168 

R. V. Bull (1839), 9 C. & P. 22 943 

R. V. Bull (1871), 12 Cox, C. C. 31 329 

R. V. Bullard (1872), 12 Cox, C. C. 353 615 

R. „. Bullock (1825), 1 Moody, C. 0. 324, n. (a) 205, 209 

R. V. Burbage (1 763), 3 Burr. 1440 837 

R. V. Burdett (1865), Dears. C. C. 431 ; 6 Cox, C. C. 458 943 

R. ■<-. Burgiss (1836), 7 C. & P. 488 829 

R. ^. Burke (1859), 8 Cox, C. C. 44, 47 58, 963 

R. a. Burley (1818), 2 Stark. Ev. 13, n. (z) 668, 569, 632 

R. ■„. Burridge (1735), 3 P. Wms. 497 17 

R. 6 . Burt (1851), 5 Cox, C. C. 284 251 

R. V. Burton (1853), Dears. 284 121 

R. o. Bury St. Edmunds (1784), Cald. 486 465 

R. „. Bush (1818), R. & R. 372 216 

R. V. Butcher (1798), 1 Lea. 265, n 585 

R. V. Butterwick (1839), 2 M. & Rob. 196 824 

R. V. Buttery (1818), R. & R. 342 1105, 1107 

R. V. Buttle (1870), 39 L. J. M. C. 115 ; 11 Cox, C. C. 666 ; L. R. 1 C. C. 

248 : 22 L. T. 728 ; 18 W. R. 966 962 

R. V. Buttleton (see R v. Brittleton). 

R. V. Cadogan, E. of (1822), 5 B. & A. 902 ; 1 Dowl. & R. 550 998 

R. V. Cain (1839), 1 Craw. & D. C. C. 37 568, 685 

R. V. Callaghan (1793), McNally, Evid. 385 470 

R. V. Calvert (1848), 2 Cox, C. C. 491 335 

R. V. Cambridge, CJ. of (1736), 2 Ld. Raym. 1334 20 

B. V. CampbeU (1843), 1 C. & K. 82 215 

R. V. Canterbury, Abp. of (1848), 18 Q. B. 581 792 

R. V. Canterbury, Abp. of (1859), 28 L. J. Q. B. 164 ; 7 W. R. 212 ; 1 E. 

& E. 346 1147 

R. V. CanweU (1869), 11 Cox, C. C. 263 ; L. R. 1 C. C. 194 ; 20 L. T. 402; 

17 W. R. 023 206 

R. V. Carew (1850), 1 L. M. & P. 626, n 727 

R. i-. Carey (1845), 7 Q. B. 126 ; 14 L. J. M. C. 190 814 

R. !;. Carlile (1832), 2B. & Ad. 367— 369 84 

R. V. Carlile (1834), 6 C. & P. 643 274 

R. V. Carnarvonshire (1841), 2 Q.B. 325; IIL. J. M. C. 3; 1 G. &D. 423. . 521 

R. V. Carr (1669), 1 Sid. 418 ; Bull. N. P. 237 480 

R. «<. Carrol (1869), 11 Cox, C. C. 322 336 

R. v. Cart (1838), Maidstone Sum. Ass. MS 570 

R, V. Carter (1845), 1 Den. C. C. 65 1019, 1174 

R. V. Carter 1884), 12 Q. B. D. 522 ; 53 L. J. M. C. 96 ; 50 L. T. 432, 

596 ; 32 W. R. 663 ; 48 J. P. 456 ; 15 Cox, C. C. 448 247 

R. V. Carty (1797), cited Joy on Conf. 97 ; MoNally, Evid. 45 679 

R. V. Casey (1837), Jebb, C. C. 203 634 

R. V. Cass (1784), 1 Lea. 293, n. (a) 663, 671 

n.v. Cas8idy(1868), 1 F. & F. 79 943 

R. ■!>. Castle Morton (1820), 3 B. & Aid. 690 284 

R. V. Castleton (1795), 6 T. R. 236 303, 306 

R. V. Catesby (1824), 2 B. & C. 814 130, 131 

Xhe refercnoea a/re to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. cli 

PAGE 

R. «. Cafor(1802), 4 Esp. 117, 145; 2 East, 361 1228 

E. V. Cavendish (1873), 8 Ir. R. C. L. 178 106 

K. V. CeUier (1680), 7 How. St. Tr. 1205 673 

R. V. Chadderton (1801), 2 East, 29 420 

R. V. Champney (1836), 2 Lewin, C. 0. 259 626, 627 

R V. Champneys (1837), 2 M. & Rob. 26 1127 

R. V, Chapman (1838), 8 C. & P. 559 921, 943 

R. «/. Charlbury (1843), 3 Q. B. 378 ; 13 L. J. M. C. 19 ; 3 G. & 1). 177. . 1139 

R. V. Chailesworth (1860), 2 F. & E. 326 962, 965 

R. V. Chatham (1807), 8 East, 498 621 

R. V. Chawtou (1841), 1 Q. B. 247 ; 10 L. J. M. C. 55 740 

R. V. Cheadle (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 838 765 

R. 4). Cherry (1871), 12 Cox, C. C. 32 683, 966 

R. V. Chester (1819), 1 Chitty, R. 297 992 

R. V. Chester, Bp. of (1747), IW. BJ. 26 1133 

R. V. Chester, Sheriff of (1819), 1 Chitty, R. 477 998 

R. V. Cheverton (1862), 2 E. & E. 833 666, 571 

R. V. Chldley (1860), 8 Cox, C. C. 365 580, 583 

R. V. Christian (1842), Car. & M. 388 196, 1018 

R. V. Christie (1821), 3 Russ. C. & M. 355 468 

R. V. Christie (1858), 1 F. & F. 75 ; 7 Cox, C. C. 506 275 

R. V. Christopher (1849), 2 C. iS! K. 994 ; 1 Den. 536 ; 4 Cox, C. C. 76 283, 

284, 294, 336, 356, 969 

R. V. Clapham (1829), 4 C. & P. 29 1170 

R. V. Clare (1803), 28 How. St. Tr. 887, 924 623 

R. V. Clark (1810), R. & R. 181 211 

R. V. Clark (1818), R. & R. 358 216 

R. V. Clarke (1799), 8 T. R. 220 551 

R. V. Clarke (1817), 2 Stark. R. 241 257,375, 976 

R. V. Clarke (1859), 2 F. & F. 2 337 

R. V. Cleary (1862), 2 F. & F. 850 339, 467 

R. V. Clement (1821), 4 B. & Aid. 218 833 

R. V. Clements (1851), 2 Den. 251 ; 6 Cox, C. C. 191 ; T. & M. 579 ; 

20 L. J. M. C. 193 ; 15 Jur. 407 336 

R. V Clewes (1830), 4 C. & P. 221 661, 562, 566, 570 

R. V. Cliiii (1841), 11 A. & E. 624 ; 10 L. J. M. C. 151 1139 

R. V. Cliviger (1788), 2 T. R. 263 891 

R. V. Cluderoy (1849), 3 C. & K. 205 821, 824 

R. «/. Clure (1841), Ir. Cir. R. 275 267 

R. V. Coady (1882), 16 Cox, C- C. 89 46 

R. ■^. Oobden (1862), 3 F. & F. 833 237 

R. V. Cockbum (1857), Dears. & Bell, 203 ; 7 Cox, C. C. 265 ; 19 L. J. 

M. C. 119 ; 329, 332 

R. V. Cockcroft (1870), 11 Cox, C. C. 410 267, 951 

R. V. Cocking (1836), 2 Lewin, C. C. 235 120 

R. ■^. Cohen (1858), 8 Cox, C. C. 41 264 

R. ■^. Colclough (1882), 15 Cox, C. C. 92 ; 10 L. R. Ir. 241 246 

R. ■„. Cole (1810), 1 Ph. Ev. 508 235 

R. -v. Coleman (1852), 6 Cox, C. C. 163 1228 

R. -v. Coleorton (1830), 1 B. & Ad. 25 521 

R. V. Coleme (1850), 11 Q. B. 909 ; 3 New Sess. Cas. 143 ; 17 L. J. M. C. 

121 ; 12 Jur. 599 727 

R. V. Coll (1889), 24 L. R. Ir. 522 283, 284, 976 

R. V. CoUey (1827), M. & M. 329 '918 

R. V. Collier (1831), 6 C. & P. 160 238 

R. V. Cohner (1864), 9 Cox, C. C. 606 583 

R. V. Com. of Sewers for T. Hamlets (1842), 3 Q. B. 670 ; 3 G. & D. 92 ; 

13 L. J. Q. B. 12; 6 Jur. 1059 997 

R. V. Compton (1828), 3 C. & P. 418 205, 1129 

R. V. Coney (1882), 8 Q. B. D. 534 ; 15 Cox, C. C. 46 ; 51 L. J. M. C. 66 : 

48 L. T. 307 ; 30 W. R. 678 ; 46 J. P. 404 633 

R. V. Connell (1853), 6 Cox, C. C. 178 1126 

R. V. Conning (1868), 11 Cox, C. C. 134 ! 1029 

R. V. ConoUy (1829), 2 Lew , C. C. 229 165 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



clii TABLE OF CASES CITED, 

PAOG 

R. V. Cook (1696), 13 How. St. Tr. 348 917, 967 

E. V. Cooke (1824), 1 C. & P. 322 820 

R. V. Cooke (1836), 7 C. & P. 559 196 

R. V. Cooke (1838), 8 C. & P. 682 80, 247, 615 

R. V. Cooper (1833), 5 C. & P. 635 563, 566, 667 

R. V. Cooper (1852), 3 C. & K. 318 ; 16 Jur. 750 120 

R. V. Coote (1873), L. R. 4 P. G. 605; 42 L. J. M. C. 45; 29 L. T. Ill; 

21 W. R. 553 ; 9 Moo. P. C. C. 463 582, 683 

R. V. Cope (1835), 7 C. cSi: P. 726 454, 459 

R. V. Coppard (1827), M. & M. 118 1034 

m.v. CoppuU (1801), 2 East, 25 290 

R. V. Corden (1769), 4 Burr. 2281 131 

R. V. Cornelius (1743-4), 2 Str. 1210 ; 1 Wils. 142 997 

R. V. CottiLgham (1834), 2 A. & E. 250 1139 

R. V. Cotton (1813), 3 Camp. 444 399, 406, 408, 1161 

-R.v. Cotton (1873), 12 Cox, C. C. 400 237 

R. ■(;. Court (1836), 7 C. & P. 487 565, 572 

R. «.. Courtenay(1856), 7Cox, C. C. HI; 5 Ir. C. L. R. 434 47 

R. ■<-. Courtney (1840), 2 Crawf. & D. C. C. 63 670 

R. „. Cousens (1850), 3 Russ. C. & M. 599 820 

R. V. Cox and RaUton (1884), 14 Q. B. D. 153 ; 54 L. J. M. C. 41 ; 52 

L. T. 25; 33W. E. 396; 49 J. P. 374; 15 Cox, C. C. 611 ....592, 604,605 

R. .,. Coyle (1855), 7 Cox, C. 0. 74 607, 527 

R. ^. Cradock (1863), 3 P. & F. 837 129 

R. V. Cramp (1880), 5 Q. B. D. 307 ; 49 L. J. M. C. 44 ; 42 L. T. 442 ; 28 

W. R. 701 ; 44 J. P. 411 ; 14 Cox, C. 0. 390, 401 635 

R. V. Crediton (1858), 27 L. J. M. C. 265 ; E. B. & E. 231 1170 

R. V. Creevey (1813), 1 M. & S. 273 ; 14 R. R. 427 109 

R. V. Cresswell (1876), 45 L. J. M. C. 77 ; 13 Cox, C. C. 126 ; 1 Q. B. D. 

446 ; 33 L. T. 760 ; 24 W. R. 281 130 

R. V. Crick (1832), 5 C. & P. 508 ." 209 

R. V. Crockett (1831), 4 C. & P. 544 468 

R. V. Croke (1774), 1 Cowp. 30 1137 

R. V. Crondall (1847), 2 New Sess. Caa. 667; 10 Q. B. 812 521 

R. V. Cross (1856), Dears, ft Bell, 68 ; 966 

R. ■:,. Crossfield (1796), 26 How. St. Tr. 109 556, 559 

R. V. Croucher (1862), 3 F. & F. 285 332, 336 

R. ■„. Crowther (1786), 1 T. R. 125 ; 1 R. R. 162 336 

R. V. Cruise (1842), Ir. Oir. R. 674 986 

R. V. Cruse (1838), 8 C. & P. 545 81, 165, 166 

R. V. Culkin (1832), 5 C. & P. 121 213 

R. V. Culpepper (1696), Skin. 673 306 

R. V. Curgeuwen (1865), 35 L. J. M. C. 58 ; L. R. 1 C. C. 1 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 

984 ; 13' L. T. 383 ; 14 W. R. 55 ; 10 Cox, C. C. 152 172 

R. V. Curtis (1848), 2 C. & K. 763 958 

R. V. Daman (1819), 2 B. ft Aid. 378 131 

R. V. Danu(18<5), 1 Moo. C. C. 424 1127 

R. V. Davie (1837), 6 A. & E. 386 763 

R. V. Davis (1833), 6 C. ft: P. 177 580, 682 

R. ». Davis (1870), L.R.I C. C. 272; 39 L. J. M. C. 135; 11 Cox, C. C. 578 251 

R. V. Dawber (1821), 3 Stark. R. 34 633 

R. V. Dawson (1821). 3 Stark. 62 204 

R. V. Day (1852), 6 Cox, C. C. 55 835, 336 

R. V. Deacon (1746), Fost. C. L. 9 626 

R. 1). Dean (1852), 6 Cox, C. 0. 23 ; 18 How. St. Tr. 366 257 

R. V. Dean of St. Asaph (1783), 21 How. St. Tr. 1033 23, 45 

R. ». De Berenger (1814), 3 M. & S. 67 ; 15 R. R. 415 18, 1092 

R. V. DelaMotte (1781), 1 East, P. C. 124 318, 972 

R. V. Denio (1827), 7 B. & C. 620 ; 1 M. & R. 294 303 

R. V. Dent (1813), 1 C. & K. 97 938 

R. V. Derby (1850), 1 L. M. & P. 660 727 

R. V. DerbyHhire (1837), 6 A. ft: E. 885 727 

R. „. Derrington (1826), 2 0. & P. 418 568 

R. ^. De Salvi (1857), C. 0. 0. Sess. Pap. vol. 46, p. 884 1126 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. cliii 

PAGB 

R. V. Despard (1803), 28 How. St. Tr. 489 635 

R. «. Devlin (1841), 2 Crawf . & D. C. 0. Ifi2 669 

R. V. Dewhurst (1825), 1 Lew. C. 0. 47 580 

R. V. Dillon (1877), 14 Cox, C. C. 4 283 

R. ». Dilmore (1852), 6 Cox, C. C. 52 326, 337 

R. V. Dingier (1 791), 2 Lea. 561 333 

R. V. Din(;ley (1845), 1 C. & K. 637 566, 569, 572 

R. V. Dixon (1765), 3 Burr. 687 604, 969 

R. S.Dixon (1814), 3 M. & Sel. 15; 4 Camp. 12; 15 R. R. 381 80, 107 

R. V. Doherty (1810), 13 East, 171 ; 12 R. R. 315 893 

R. V. Doherty (1874), 13 Cox, C. C. 23 566 

R. V. Doolin (1832), 1 Jebb, C. C. 123 971 

R. V. Doran (1791), 1 Esp. 127 296 

R. V. Dossett (1846), 2 C. & K. 306 248 

R. ». Douglas (1824), 2 Dowl. N. S. 416 341 

R. V. Douglas (1845), 1 C. & K. 670 348 

R. t). Douglas (1846 , 13 Q. B. 42 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 417 ; UJur. 841. .341, 348, 

1029 

R. ». Dowlin (1792), Pea. R. 170; 3 R. R. 679 354 

R. V. Dowling 1826), Ry. & M. 433 209 

R. 1). Dowuer (1880), 14 Cox, C. C. 486 604 

R. V. Downham (1858), 1 F. & F. 386 312 

R. V. Downing (1840), Chelmsford Spring Assizes, MS 564 

R. V. Downshire, Dow. March, of (1835), 4 A. & E. 232 ; 5 N. & M. 662 ; 

5 M. & W. 662 209 

R.v. Doyle (1840), 1 Crawf. &D. C.C. 396 569 

R. «;. Drage (1875), 14 Cox, C. C. 85 247 

R. «i. Drew (1837), 8 C. & P. 140 563, 572 

R. V. Drummond (1784), 1 Lea. C. C. 338 464, 467 

R. V. Drury (1849), 3 C. & K. 193 1140 

R. V. Duffin (1818), R. & R. 365 81 

R. ». Dukinfield (1848), 11 Q. B. 678; 17 L. J. M. C. 113 454 

R. V. Dulwioh College (1851), 17 Q. B. 600 ; 21 L. J. Q. B. 36 ; 16 Jur. 664 791 

R. V. Dunboyne, Ld. (1850), 3 C. & Kir. 1 77 

R. V. Dunoombe (1838), 8 C. & P. 369 929 

R. V. Dungey (1864), 4 F. & F. 99 1127 

R. e. Dunmurry (1841), Ir. Cir. R. 312 216 

R. V. Dunn (1826), 1 Moo. C. C. 146 238, 247 

R. V. Dunn (1831), 4 C. & P. .543 564 

R. V. Dunne (1838), Ir. Cir. R. 407 986 

R. *. Dunsford (1835), 2 A. & E. 568 ; 4 N. & M. 349 ; 1 H. & W. 93 . . 50 

R. 1). Dunstan (1824), Ry. & M. 109 47 

R. V. Durham (1787), 1 Lea. C. C. 478 633 

R. V. Durkin (1837), 2 Lew. C. C. 163 826 

R. 1). Durore (1784), 1 Lea. 351 ; 1 East, P. C. 45 202 

R. V. Dwyers (1843), 1 Ruas. C. & M. 797 577 

R. V. East. Count. Ry. Co. (1839), 10 A. & E. 631 998 

R. V. East Fairley (1826), 6 Dowl. & R. 153 303 

R. 0. East Mark Tything (1848), 11 Q. B. 887 ; 3 Cox, C. C. 60 ; 17 L. J. 

Q. B. 877 ; 12 Jur. 332 124 

R. V. East Winch (1840), 12 A. & B. 697 521 

R. V. Eaton (1851), 2 Den. C. C. 274 ; nom. R. „. Uezzeli, 3 C. & K. 150; 

T. & M. 598 209 

R. v. Edgar (1831), 3 Russ. C. & M. 441 560 

R. V. Edmonton (1831), 1 M. & Rob. 32 113 

n.v. Edmunds (1833), 6 C. .S; P. 164 326, 329, 528 

R. ». Edmundson (1859), 28 L. J. M. C. 213 ; 2 E. & E. 77 ; 8 Cox, C. C. 

212 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 1351 264 

R. ,-. Edwards (1791), 4 T. R. 440 947, 967 

R. t,. Edwards (1837), 8 C. & P. 26 959 

R. ». Edwards rf 872), 12 Cox, C. C. 230 377 

R. I). Edwinstowe (1828), 8 B. & C. 671 521 

R. D. Egerton (1819), R. & R. 375 ; cited in R. v. Ellis, 6 B. & C. 148 241 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



cliv TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PA<JB 

E. ■!). Eldershaw (1828), 3 C. & P. 396 100 

E. V. Elderton (1703), 2 Ld. Eaym. 980 4 

E. V. Eldridge (1821), E. & E. 440 560 

E. V. Ellel (1845), 7 Q. B. 593 ; 2 New Sess. Cas. 39 1139 

E. V. Ellioombe (1833), 5 C. & P. 622 296, 314, 318 

E. V. EUlott (1839), 8 0. & P. 772 216 

E. V. Ellis (1802), MoNally, Ev. 55 883 

E. V. ElUs (1824, should be 1826), 6 B. & C. 147 236, 241, 669 

E. V. Elrington (1862), 1 B. & S. 688 ; 31 L. J. M. C. 14; 9 Cox, 0. C. 86. . 1131 
E. V. Elworthy (1867), L. E. 1 C. C. 103 ; 37 L. J. M. C. 3 ; 17 L. T. 293 ; 

16-W.E.207; 10 Cox, C. C. 579 318 

E. V. Ely, Bp. of (1828), 8 B. & C. 112 ; 2 M. & E. 127 997 

E. ». Emmons (1840), 2 M. & Rob. 279 826 

E. ■!>. Enoch (1833), 5 C. & P. 639 563, 572 

E. V. Entrehman (1842), C. & Marsh. 248 £05 

E. V. Eriswell (1790), 3 T. E. 721 325, 329, 333, 340, 368, 398, 420 

E. V. Erith (1807), 8 East, 539 ,420 

E. V. Errington (1838), 2 Lew. 0. C. 142 333, 468 

E. V. EsdaUe (1858), 1 E. & E. 213 1231 

E. V. Esop (1836), 7 C. & P. 456 80 

E. «.. Evans (1821), 3 Stark. 35 204 

E. V. Evans (1839), 8 C. & P. 765 215 

E. V. Evenwood Barony (1843), 3 Q. B. 370 1139 

E. V. ExaU (1866), 4 E. & E. 922 120 

E. «). Exeter (1869), L. E. 4 Q. B. 341 ; 38L. J.M. C. 127 ; lOB. &S.433.. 444, 

445 
E. „. Exeter, Treasurer of (1829), 5 M. & E. 167 ; and see 8 A. & E. 690. . 824 

E. V. Eagent (1835), 7 C. & P. 238 468,469 

E. «>. Eairie (1867), 8 E. & B. 486 247, 1121 

E. V. Ealkner and Bond (1822), E. & E. 481 660 

E. 1). Eanning (1865), 17 Ir. C. L. E. 289 ; 10 Cox, C. C. 411 ; 14 W. E. 

701 149 

E. V. Earler (1837), 8 C. & P. 106 633, 634 

E. v. Earley (1846), 2 C. & K. 313 592, 601, 605 

E. V. Earrell (1874), 43 L. J. M. C. 94; 12 Cox, C. C. 606 ; L. E. 2 C. C. 

116; 29L. T. 404; 22 W. E. 678 332 

E. V. Earrington (1811), E. & E. 207 80 

E. V. Eeargus O'Connor (1843), 5 Q. B. 16 000 

E. V. Eearshire (1779), 1 Lea. 202 283, 679 

E. V. Felton (1628), 3 How. St. Tr. 371 673 

E. ». Fennell (1881), 7 Q. B. D. 147 ; 50 L. J. M. C. 126 ; 44 L T. 687 ; 

29 W. E. 742 ; 45 J. P. 666 ; 14 Cox, C. C. 607 671 

E. V. Ferrers, E. of (1758), 1 Burr.635 893 

E. V. Ferry Frystone (1801), 2 East, 64 368, 420 

E. V. Finnoane (1833), 6 C. & P. 551 238 

E. V. Firth (1869), 38 L. J. M. C. 54 ; 11 Cox, C. C. 234 ; L. E. 1 C. C. 

172 ; 19 L. T. 746 ; 17 W. E. 327 236 

E. V. Fisher (1785), cited 1 Lea. 310, 311, n 579 

E. V. Fitzgerald (1741), 1 Lea. C. C. 20 1049, 1172 

E. V. Fitzgerald (184 1), Ir. Cir. E. 168 469 

E. V. Fitzgerald (1884), unreported 877 

E. V. Fitzsimons (1869), I. E. 4 C. L. 1 289 

E. V. Flaherty (1847), 2 C. & K. 782 293 

E. V. Flannagan (1882), 15 Cox, C. C. 463 237, 247 

E. ■</. Flatley (1842), Ir. Cir. E. 445 942 

E. V. FlaveU (1884), 14 Q. B. D. 364; 62 L. T. 133 ; 33 W. E. 343 ; 49 

J. P. 406 595 

E. V. Fleming (1842), 1 Arm. M. & 0. 330 663, 571 

E. V. Flemming (1799), 2 Lea. 864 334, 338 

E. V. Fletcher (1829), 4 0. & P. 250 562 

E. i". FHntshire (1846), 3 Dowl. & L. 637 758, 788 

E. 11. Folkes (1832), 1 Moo. C. C. 354 238 



The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clv 

FAOB 

R. V. Fontaine Moreau (1848), 11 Q. B. 1028 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 187 ; 12 Jur. 

626 1U6, 1117 

E. V. Forbes (1814), Holt, N. P. R. 599, n 335 

B. V. Forbes (1836), 7 C. & P. 224 247 

R. V. Ford (1861), 2 Den. C. C. 245 ; 2 C. & K. 113 ; 5 Cox, 0. C. 184. .925, 958 
R. V. Fordingbridge (1868). E. B. & E. 685, 678 ; 27 L. J. M. C. 290 ; 4 

Jut. N. S. 951 '. ;149, 303 

R. V. Forester (1866), 4 F. & F. 857 468 

R. D. Forster (1865), Dears. 466 246 

E. V. Forsyth (1814), R. & R. 274 15, 211 

R. ■„. Foster (1827), 1 Lewin, C. C. 46 576 

R. -D. Foster (1834), 6 C. & P. 325 377, 562 

R. V. Fox Maule (1839), 7 Dowl. 693 832 

R. V. France (1839), 2 M. & Rob. 207 336 

R. ». Francis (1874), 43 L. J. M. C. 97 ; L. R. 2 C. C. 128 ; 12 Cox, C. C. 

612 ; 30 L. T. 503 ; 22 W. R. 663 ' 247 

R. V. Franoklin (1731), 17 How. St, Tr. 638 1093 

R. V. Eraser (1797), 1 MoNaUy, Et. 56 883 

R. V. Frederick (1738), 2 Str. 1095 888 

R. V. Fi'eeman (1875), I. R. 9 C. L. 527 265 

R. V. Freind (1696), 13 How. St. Tr. 16 837, 960, 961, 907 

R. V. Fretwell (1864), 1 L. & 0. 443 ; 9 Cox, C. C. 471 ; 31 L. J. M. C. 

145 : 6 L. T. 333 ; 10 W. E. 545 80 

R. V. Frost (1839), 9 C. & P. 131 829, 895, 896, 909 

R. V. Frost (1855), Dears. C. C. 474 ; 6 Cox, C. C. 626 ; 3 C. L. E. 665 ; 

24 L.J. M. C. 116; IJur. N. S. 406 198, 216 

E. V. FuUarton (1853), 6 Cox, C. C. 191 198 

E. V. Fuller (1816), E. & E. 0. C. 308 121 

E. V. Fullford (1861), 1 L. & Cave, 403 ; 9 Cox, C. C. 463 ; 33 L. J. M. C. 

122 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 522 ; 10 L. T. 346 ; 12 W. E. 716 47 

E. V. Fumival (1821), R. & R. 446 206 

E. r. Fursey (1833), 6 0. & P. 81 241, 308 

R. V. Gadbury (1838), 8 C. & P. 676 261 

R. V. Gallagher (1875), 15 Cox, C. C. 291 i 883 

R. V. Gallagher (1883), 13 Cox, C. C. 61 633 

R. n. Galvin (1865), 16 Ir. C. L. E. 452 335 

E. V. Ganz (1882), 9 Q. B. D. 93 ; 51 L. J. Q. B. 419 ; 46 L. T. 592 .... 1028 

E. V. Garhett (1847), 1 Den. C. C. 236 ; 2 C. & K. 474 584, 960, 965, 970 

E. V. Gardiner (1839), 8 C. & P. 737 ; 2 Moo. C. C. 95 627 

E. 1/. Gardner (1810), 2 Camp. 513 ; U E. E. 784 518, 1093 

E. V. Garner (1848), 1 Den. 3i9 ; 3 New Sess. Cas. 329; 2 C. & K. 920. .563, 571 

E. V. Garner (1864), 3 P. & F. 681 237 

E. J/. Garnt (1S67), 36 L. J. M. C. 89; L. E. 2 Q. B. 466; 8 B. &S.365.. 1160 

E. V. Gay (1836), 7 C. & P. 230 470 

R. i-. Gaynor (1839), 1 Crawf. & D. C. C. 142 ; Jebb, 0. C. 262 627, 629 

R. ■!/. Gazard (1838), 8 C. & P. 695 612, 899 

R. .,. Geach (1840), 9 C. & P. 499 80 

R. V. Geering (1849), 18 L. J. M. C. 215 237, 247 

R. V. Genge (1774), 1 Cowp. 16 60 

R. V. Gibbons (1823), 1 C. & P. 98, n. (i) 564, 666, 594 

R. 1,. Gibney (1822), Jebb, C. C. 15 567, 569, 570 

R. •</. Gibson (1802), E. & E. 343 1105, 1107 

E. V. Gibson (1887), 18 Q. B. D. 637; 66 L. J. M. C. 49 ; 66 L. T. 367 ; 

36 W. E. 411 ; 51 J. P. 742 : 16 Cox, C. C. 181 1231 

E. V. Giddins (1842), C. & Marsh. 634 238 

E. V. Gilbrass (1836), 7 C. & P. 444 826 

E. J). Gilham (1795), 1 Esp. 285 ; 6 T. E. 265 905 

E. V. GUham (1828), 1 Moo. C. C. 186 ; Joy on Conf. 52— 66. . . . 567, 683, 594, 

595, 596 

E. V. GQlis (1866), 11 Cox, 0. C. 69 669, 582, 584 

E. «. GUlow (1826), 1 Moody, C. C. 85 ; 1 Lewin, C. 0. 57 82 

E. V. GUmore (1882), 15 Cox, C. C. 86 1126 

R. V. Gilson (1807), R. & R. 138 296 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



Clvi TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAOB 

R. V. Girdwood (1770), 1 Leaeh, C. C. 142 ; 2 East, P. C. 1120 46 

E. V. Gisbum (1812), 15 East, 67 91" 

K. V. Giason (1847), 2 0. & K. 781 1126 

R. ». Glassie (1854), 7 Cox, 0. C. 1 888 

R. V. Gleed (1832), 3 Russ. C. & M. 623 892 

R. V. Glynne (1871), L. R. 7 Q. B. 16 ; 41 L. J. M. C. 58 ; 26 L. T. 61 ; 

20 W R. 94 1160 

R. V. Goddaid (1882), 16 Cox, C. C. 7 468 

R. V. Goldsliede (1844), 1 C. & K. 651 683 

R. V. Goldsmith (1873), 12 Cox, C. C. 479 8* 

R. V. Goodere (1741), 17 How. St. Tr. 1015 917 

R. V. Goodfellow (1879), 14 Cox, C. C. 326 332 

R. V. Goodwin (1828), 1 Lew. C. C. 100 148 

R. V. Gordon (1789), 1 Lea. 515 148 

H.v. Gordon (1842), Car. & M. 410 1034 

R. V. Gordon (1855), 25 L. J. M. C. 19 ; Dears. C. C. 686 302, 1193 

R. V. Gordon, Ld. G. (1781), 21 How. St. Tr. 535. .377, 378, 383, 895, 960, 961 

R. V. Gould (1840), 9 C. & P. 364 121, 685 

R. V. Grady (1836), 7 C. & P. 660 334 

R. V. Graham (1791), 2 Leach, 547 217 

R. V. Gray (1835), 7 C. & P. 164 238 

R. V. Gray (1841), Ir. Cir. R. 73 465, 469 

R. V. Gray (1866), 4 F. & F. 1102 . . ., 247 

R. V. Great Bolton (1845). 7 Q. B. 387 ; 14 L. J. M. C. 122 1139 

R. V. Great Canfield (1810), 6 Esp. 136 209 

R. V. Green (1832), 5 C. & P. 312 ., 570, 576 

R. V. Green (1834), 6 C. & P. 665 568 

R. V. Green (1852), 3 C. & K. 209 246 

R. V. Greenaway (1846), 7 Q. B. 126 814, 833 

R. V. Greene (1837), 6 A. & E. 548 1092 

R. V. Gregory (1846), 8 Q. B. 608 ; 2 New Sess. Cas. 229 ; 15 L. J. M. C. 

38 ; 10 Jur. 387 216 

R. V. GrifBn (1809), R. & R. 161 685 

R. V. Griffin (1853), 6 Cox, C, C. 219 567, 596 

R. v. Griffin (1879), 14 Cox, C. C. 308 ; 4 L. R. Ir. 497 149 

R. ». Griffiths (1832), 3 Russ. C. & M. 456, 463 571 

R. V. Griffiths (1841), 9 C. & P. 746 958 

R. V. Grimwood (1815), 1 Price, 369 1050 

R. V. Groombridge (1836), 7 C. & P. 582 99 

R. 1). Grove (1833), 7 C. & P. 635 ; 1 Moo. C. C. 447 212 

R. V. Gmndon (1775), 1 Cowp. 322 1103, 1108 

R. V. Guinea (1841), Ir. Cir. R. 167 927 

R. '„. Gully (1773), 1 Leach, 98 14 

R. V. Gumble (1872), 42 L. J. M. C. 7 ; L. R. 2 C. C. 1 ; 12 Cox, C. C. 

248 ; 27 L. T. 692 ; 21 W. R. 299 198, 212 

R. V. Gumey (1869), 11 Cox, C. C. 414 909 

R. X.. Gutoh (1829), M. & M. 433 107, 687 

R. V. Guthrie (1870), 11 Cox, C. C. 522 ; L. R. 1 C. C. 241 ; 39 L. J. M. C. 

95 ; 22 L. T. 485 ; 18 W. R. 792 206 

R. „. Guttridge (1840), 9 C. & P. 473 330, 376 

R. „. Hagan (1837), 8 C. & P. 167 328 

R. «-. Hagan (1873), 12 Cox, C. C. 357 248 

R. V. Haines (1830), 2 Russ. C. & M. (4th ed.) 886 678 

R. «. Hains (1696), Comb. 337 1019, 1032, 1033, 1046, 1052 

R. .-. Hale (1778), 2 Cowp. 728 120 

R. „. Hall (1790), 1 Lewin, C. C. 110 569, 679 

R. V. Hall (1838), 8 C. & P. 358 388, 662 

R. ■„. Halliday (1860), 29 L. J. M. C. 148; 8Cox,C. C. 298; Bell, C. C. 257.. 891 

R. 1). Hamp (1852), 6 Cox, C. C. 167 314 

R. i). Handoock (1841), Ir. Cir. R. 229 961 

R. ?;. Hankins (1849), 2 C. & K. 823 314, 604 

R. «. Hanson (1841), C. & Marsh. 334 ; 2 Moo. C. C. 245 80 

R. V. Hapgood and Wyatt (1870), 11 Cox, C. C. 471 206 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clvii 

PAGE 

R. ». Harbome (1835), 2 17. & M. 341; 2 A. & E. 540; 1 H. iW. 36..106, 173 

R. 1'. Harding (1842), 1 Arm. M. & O. 340 572 

R. V. Hardwiok (1809), 11 East, 585 385, 386, 493, 494, 496 

R. V. Hardwiok (1811), 1 C. & P. 98, n. (J) 566 

R. V. Hardy (1794), 24 How. St. Tr. 704. .248, 383, 384, 385, 613, 614, 927, 944 

R. V. Hare (1870), 13 Cox, C. C. 174 627 

R.v. Hargrave (1831), 5 C. & P. 170 633 

R. V. Harringworth (1815), 4 M. & Sel. 353 1208 

R. V. Harris (1680), 7 How. St. Tr. 926 252 

R. V. Harris (1832), 1 Moo. C. C. 338 284, 579 

R. ./. Harris (1836), 7 C. & P. 429 246,943 

R. ■,,. Harris (1850), 4 Cox, C. C. 440 336 

R. ■„. Harris (1860), 8 Cox, C. C. 333 120 

R. .-. Harris (1864), 4 P. & P. 342 248 

R. V. Harrison (1692), 12 How. St. Tr. 851 330, 340 

R. V. Han-ison (1834), 2 Lew. C. C. 118 246 

R. V. Harriss (1822), 5 B. & Aid. 926 629 

R. V. Harrisson (1846), 2 New Sess. Cas. 490 996 

R. t<. Hartington (1855), 4 E. & B. 780 1106, 1131 

R. V. Harvey (should be Harney) (1827), 2 B. & C. 257 ; 3 D. & R. 464 . . 109 

R. V. Harvey (1850), 4 Cox, C. C. 441 332 

R. D. Harvey (1871), L. R. 1 C. C. 284; 40 L. J. M. C. 63; 23 L. T. 856; 

19 "W. R. 446 ; 11 Cox, C. C. 662 264 

R. V. Harvey (1874), 44 L. J. M. C. 1 ; L. R. 10 Q. B. 46 1137 

R. ». Haslingfield (1814), 2 M. & Sel. 558 ; 15 R. R. 350 1039 

R. V. Hastings (1835), 7 C. & P. 152 633 

R. V. Hatfield (1835), 4 A. & E. 156 112, 113 

R. V. Haughton (1853), 1 E. & B. 612 ; 6 Cox, C. C. 101 ; 22 L. J. M. C. 

89; 17 Jur. 465 89, 1109, 1141 

R. V. Hawes (1847), 1 Den. C. C. 270 1170 

R.'!;. Hawkins (1808), 10 East, 211 ; 2 Dow, 124 ; 14 R. R. 129 105 

R. ■„. Haworth (1830), 4 C. & P. 254 289, 318, 319, 683 

R. V. Hay (1860), 2 P. & P. 4 596 

R. V. Hay, Dr., Stanwix's case (1767), 1 W. Bl. 640 175 

R. V. Hayes (1838), 2 M. & Rob. 155 273 

R. V. Haynes (1816), 4 M. & S. 214 208 

R. V. Hayward (1833), 6 C. & P. 157 468 

R. V. Hayward (1846), 2 C. & Kir. 234 ; 1 Den. C. C. 166 604 

R. V. Hazell (1810), 13 East, 141 131 

R. ». Hazy (1826), 2 C. & P. 458 263, 278 

R. V. Heaiey (1824), 1 Moody, C. C. 1 202 

R. V. Hearu (1841), C. & Marsh. 109 563, 568, 578 

R. V. Heame (1830), 4 C. & P. 215 662 

R. V. Heath (1744), 18 How. St. Tr. 123 899 

R. 'v. Hebden (1738), Andr. 389 88, 1114 

R. V. Hedges (1767), 28 How. St. Tr. 1367 924 

R. V. Heesom (1878), 14 Cox, C. C. 14, 40 237, 332 

R. V. HelUng (1715-16), 1 Str. 8 131, 132 

R. 1-. Henderson (1841), 2 Moo. C. C. 192 1126 

R. V. Hendon (undated), cited arguendo, 9 C. & P. 255 438 

R. ... Henwood (1870), 11 Cox, C. C. 526 ; 22 L. T. 486 236 

R. V. Herefordshire, JJ., Ex parte Humphreys (1850), 19 L. J. M. C. 189; 

1 L. M. & P. 323 936 

R. 1,. Herrington (1864), 3 New R. 468 1169 

R. V. Herstmonceaux (1827), 7 C. & B. 555 681 

R. X,. Hewett (1842), C. & Marsh. 534 563, 666, 567 

R. ■^. Hewins (1841), 9 C. & P. 786 196 

R. ■„. Heydon (1762), 1 W. Bl. 351 997 

R. v. HiokHng (184.')), 7 Q. B. 880; 15 L. J. M. C. 23 1100, 1103, 1108 

R. «. Hickman (1784), 2 East, P. C. 593 202 

R. V. Hiffgins (1829), 2 C. & P. 603 561 

R. ^. Highaeld (1828), cited 3 Russ. 0. & M. 479 583 

R. V. Higson (1849), 2 C. & K. 769 577 

Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



Clviii TABLE OF CASES CTTED. 

PAGE 

E. V. Hill (1838), SO. & P. 276 80 

E. V. Hill (1851 , 2 Den. C. C. 254 ; 20 L. J. M. 0. 222 26, 896 

R. V. HiUam (1872), 12 Cox, 0. C. 174 583, 966 

E. V. Hinckley (1810), 12 East, 361 130 

E. V. Hinckley (1863), 32 L. J. M. C. 168 ; 3 B. & S. 885 ; 8 L. T. 270 ; 

11 "W. R. 663; 9 Jur. N. S. 1054 305 

E. «>. Hind (1860), 29 L. J. M. 0. 147 ; 8 Cox, C. C. 300 465 

E. «. Hinley (1843), 2M. &Eob. 624 238 

E. V. Hinxman (1791), cited 1 Leach, C. C. 310, 311, n , 579 

E. V. Hirst (1828), 1 Lew. C. C. 46 676, 680 

E. V. Hodg-e (1838), 2 Lewin, C. C. 227 68 

E. V. Hodgkisa (1836), 7 C. & P. 298 250, 942 

E. V. Hodgson (1812), R. & E. 211 257, 951, 967 

E. V. Hodgson (1831), 1 Lewin, 236 217 

E. V. Hogg (1833), 6C. &P. 176 329 

E. «>. Hogg (1841), 2 M. & Eob. 380 215 

E. V. Holbrook (1878), 3 Q. B. D. 60 : 4 Q. B. D. 42 ; 13 Cox, C. C. 650 ; 

14 Cox, C. 0. 185; 47 L. J. Q. B. 35; 48 L. J. Q. B. 113 ; 37 L. T. 

630; 39 L. T. 536; 26 W. E. 144 ; 27 W. E. 313 107, 587 

E. V. Holden (1838), 8 C. & P. 609 943, 958 

E. V. Holl (1881), 7 Q. B. D. 575 ; SO L. J. Q. B. 763 ; 45 L. T. 69 ; 46 

J. P. 53 962 

E. V. HoUingberry (1825), 4 B. & C. 329 ; 6 Dowl. & E. 345 203 

E. V. HoUond (1794), 5 T. E. 607 ; 2 E. E. 678 208 

E. «. Holmes (1843), 1 C. & Kir. 248 572 

E. f. Holmes (1861), 2 E. &F. 788 897 

E. V. Holmes and Fnrness (1871), 41 L. J. M. C. 12 ; 12 Cox, C. C. 137 ; 

L. E. IC. 0. 334 257, 950, 961, 967 

E. i-. Holt (1793), 6T. E. 436 16, 20, 1093 

E. V. Holt (1836), 7 C. & P. 618 81 

E. V. Holt (I860), 30 L. J. M. C. 11 ; Bell, C. C. 280 ; 8 Cox, C. C. 411 ; 

6 Jur. N. S. 1121; 3 L. T. 310 ; 9 W. E. 74 247 

E. ----- 

E. 
E. 
E. 
E. 
E. 
E. 
E. 
E. 
E. 
E. 
E. 
E. 
E 
E 
E 
E 



Holy Trinity, Hull (1827), 7 B. & C. 611 ; 1 M. & E. 444 288 

.(...Hood (1830), iMoo. C. C. 281 888 

V. Hook (1857), Dears. & BeU, 606 ; 8 Cox, C. C. 6 629 

V. Hooper (1842), cited 3 Euss. C. & M. 509 679 

■„. Hopes (1835), 7 C. & P. 136 ; 1 M. & Eob. 396 678 

V. Home (1777), 20 How. St. Tr. 664 274, 275, 276 

V. Home Tooke (1794), 25 How. St. Tr. 120 526, 923, 1220 

■,;. Hostmen of Newcastle (1744-5), 2 Str. 1223 994, 997 

V. Hough (1806), E. & E. 122 '246 

■„. Houlton (1823), 1 Jebb, C. C. 24 889, 892 

■„. Howard (1832), 1 M. & Eob. 187 147 

■■,. Howell (1845), 1 C. & K. 689 ; 1 Den. C. C. 1 468 

„. Howes (1834), 6 C. &-P. 404 567 

■.,. Hubbard (1881), 14 Cox, C.C. 665 468 

■c. Hucks (1816), 1 Stark. N. P. E. 623 25, 51) 

„. Huet (1798), 2 Lea. 821 679 

■„. Hughes (1813), 2 Lew. C. C. 229 ; 1 Euss. C. & M. 147 165 

E. ^. Hughes (1832), 5 C. & P. 126 213 

E. ^. Hughes (1839), 1 Crawf. & D. C. 0. 13 1018 

E. V. Hughes (1844), 1 C. & K. 619 616 

E V. Hughes (i860), 29 L. J. M. C. 71 239 

E. V. Hulcott (1796), 6T. R. 583 132, 1137 

E. v. HuU (1860), 2 F. & F. 16 78 

E. „. Hulme (1870), L. R. 5 Q. B. 377 ; 39 L. J. Q B. 149 962 

R. ■„. Humphries (1829), cited 3 Euss. C. & M. 344 '. 318 

R. i;. Hunt (1811), 2 Camp. 583 ; 31 How. St. Tr. 408 203 

R. V. Hunt (1820), 3 B. & Aid. 666 248, 296, 383 

R. V. Hunt (1826), 1 Moo. C. C. 93 80 

R. V. Hunt (1881), 6 Q. B. D. 300 ; 60 L. J. M. 0. 35 1140 

E. V. Hunter (1829), 3 C. & P. 591 698 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. cllX 

PAOB 

R. V. Huntley (1860), 29 L. J. M. C. 70 ; BeU, C. C. 238 ; 8 Cox, 0. C. 

260; 1 L. T. 384; 8 "W. R. 183; 6 Jur. N. S. 80 1127 

R. V. Hurley (1843), 2 M. & Rob. 473 278 

R. V. Hutohins (1880), S Q. B. D. 353 ; 6 Q. B. D. 300 ; 49 L. J. M. C. 

64; 42 L. T. 766; 28 W. R. 595 89, 1073, 1131,1140 

R. V. Hutchinson (1822), 2 B. & C. 608, n 465 

R. V. Hyde (1848), 3 Cox, C. 0. 90 335 

R. V. Ingham (1864), 5 B. & S. 267; 33 L. J. Q. B. 183; 9 Cox, C. C. 

508; 10 Jut. N. S. 968 ; lOL. T. 456; 12 W. R. 793 210,213 

R. V. Ingram (1705), 1 Salk. 384 165 

R. V. Ings (1820), 33 How. St. Tr. 757 310 

R. V. Isle of Ely (1850), 15 Q. B. 827 ; 4 New Sess. Cas. 222 ; 19 L. J. 

M. C. 223 ; 14 Jur. 956 17 

R. V. Jackson (1842), cited 3 Russ. C. & M. 404 205 

R. V. Jackson (1855), 6 Cox, C. C. 525 883 

R. n. Jacobs (1784), 1 Lea. 309 283, 579 

R. V. Jagger (1797), cited 3 Russ. C. & M. 625 893 

R. V. James (1823), cited 1 C. & P. 86 947 

R. V. Jarrald (1863), L. & C. 301 ; 9 Cox, C. C. 307 ; 32 L. J. M. C. 258 ; 

9 Jur. N. S. 629 ; 8 L. T. 515 ; 11 W. R. 787 209 

R. V. Jarvis (1756), 1 East, 644, n 263 

R. V. Jarvis (1837), 2 M. & Rob. 40 81, 633, 635 

R. V. Jarvis (1855), 25 L. J. M. C. 30 ; Dears. C. C. 552 ; 7 Cox, C. C. 532 ; 

1 Jur. N. S. 1114 121 

R. V. Jarvis (1867), L. R. 1 C. C. 96 572 

R. V. Jeffries (1722), 1 Str. 446 20, 1006 

R. V. Jelioote (1819), 2 Stark. R. 483 576 

R. V. JeUyman (1838), 8 C. & P. 604 893 

R. V. Jenkins (1822), R. & R. 492 563, 586 

R. V. Jenkins (1869), L R. 1 C. C. 187 ; 38'L. J. M. C. 82; 11 Cox, C. C. 

250 468 

R. V. Jennings (1858), Dears. & B. C. C. 447 ; 7 Cox, C. C. 397 ; 4 Jur. 

N. 8. 146 205, 1129 

R. V. Jeyes (1835), 3 A. & E. 416 821, 822, 824 

R. V. John (1790), 1 East, P. C. 357 467 

R. V. Johnson (1805), 7 East, 65 ; 3 Smith, 94 ; 29 How. St. Tr. 103 ; 

8 R. R. 597, and Preface viii 154, 302 

R. V. Johnson (1827), 1 Moo. C. C. 173 824 

R. V. Johnson (1829), 2 C. & K. 355 579 

R. V. Johnson (1846), 2 C. & K. 394 335, 374 

R. «. Johnson (1847), 2 C. & K. 355 336, 578 

R. V. Johnston (1864), 16 Ir. C. L. R. 60 669 

R. V. Johnstone (1793), 2 East, P. C. 786 202 

R. V. JolifEe (1791), 4 T. R. 290 ; 2 R. R. 383 324, 353, 364 

R. V. Jones (1774), 1 Lea. 174 151, 1209 

R. V. Jones (1791), Pea. R. 38 354 

R. V. Jones (1806), 8 East, 31, 451 ; 9 R. R. 368 342 

R. ®. Jones (1809), 2 Camp. 131 ; 11 Rev. R. 680 15, 18, 67, 147, 237, 585, 

633 

R. V. Jones (1809), R. &R 152 663, 671 

R. V. Jones (1827), 2 C. & P. 629 661 

R. V. Jones (1831), 2 B. & Ad. 611 203 

R. V. Jones (1834), 7 C. & P. 167 826, 829 

R. I/. Jones (1840), 9 C. & P. 260 81, 822 

R. 17. Jones (1846), 1 Den. C. C. 166 ; 2 C. & K. 234 604 

R. V. Jones (1868), 11 Cox, C. C. 388 106 

R. V. Jones (1872), 12 Cox, C. C. 241 572 

R. V. Jones (1883), 52 L. J. M. C. 96 ; 15 Cox, C. C. 284 106, 172 

R. V. Jones (1887), 14 Cox, C. C. 3 247 

R. V. Jordan (1838), 9 C. & P. 118 99, 273, 274 

R. V. Kain (1883), 15 Cox, C. C. 388 274 

R. ». Kea(1809), 11 East, 132; lOR. R. 448 621 

VoL I. ends with page 63,5. 



Clx TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOE 

E. V. Kealey (1851), 2 Den. 68 ; T. & M. 405 ; 5 Cox, C. C. 193 ; 20 L. J. 

M. 0. 57 ; 15 Jur. 230 202 

B. V. KeUy (1825), 1 Moo. C. C. 113 ; 1 Lew. C. C. 193 213 

E. V. Kelsey (1832), 1 Dowl. 481 824 

E. 1). Kenilworth (1788), 2 T. E. 599 1103 

E. V. Kenilworth (1845), 2 Sess. Cas. 72 ; 7 Q. B. 652 ; 14 L. J. M. 0. 160 ; 

9 Jur. 898 304 

E. V. Kenny (1877), 46 L. J. M. C. 156 ; 13 Cox, C. C. 397 ; 2 Q. B. D. 307 ; 

36 L. T. 36 ; 25 W. E. 679 165 

E. v.JJ. of Kent (1873), L. R. 8 Q. B. 305; 42 L. J. M. 0. 112 726 

E. V. Keme (1679^, 7 How. St. Tr. 714 518 

E. V. Kerr (1837), 8 0. & P. 176 669 

E. 1-. Kiddy (1824), 4 D. & E. 734 335 

E. V. Killminster (1835). 7 C. & P. 228 78 

E. V. Kimber (1849), 3 Cox, C. C. 223 677 

E. V. King (1788), 2 T. E. 236 997, 1050, 1054 

E. V. Kinglake (1870), 11 Cox, C. C. 499 969 

E. V. Bjngsclere (1843), 3 Q. B. 388 : 13 L. J. M. C. 22 ; 3 G. & D. 177.. 1139 
E. V. Kingston, Duch. of (1776), 20 How. St. Tr. 538, n. ; 1 Smith's L. C. 

812 1103, 1104, 1116, 1131, 1132, 1133 

E. V. Kingston (1830), 4 C. & P. 387 563, 664, 571 

E. V. Kingston (1806), 8 East, 41 ; 9 E. E. 373 237 

E. V. Kinloeh, Sir A. Gordon (1795), 26 How. St. Tr. 937 923 

E. V. Kinloeh (1746), 18 How. St. Tr. 402 897 

E. V. Kinsey (1836), 7 C. & P. 447 829 

E.4). Kitson (1832, should bel853),22L.J.M.C. 118; Dears. C.C.187..296,314,318 

E. V. Knaptoft (1824), 2 B. & C. 883 1131 

E. V. Knill (1822), 5 B. & Aid. 929, 930, n 629 

E. V. Kuollys (1694), 1 Ld. Eaym. 10, 15 18 

E. i: Koops (1837), 6 A. & E. 198 1045 

E. «-. Laindon (1799), 8 T. E. 379 755 

E. V. Lallement (1853), 6 Cox, C. C. 204 198 

E. v. Lambe (1784), 2 Lea. 559 579 

E. V. Lambe (1791), 2 Lea. 552 676 

E. 1). Lambeth (1845), 5 Q. B. 513 727 

E. V. Lancashire (1843), 3 Q. B. 367 ; 12 L. J. M. C. 76 ; 2 G. & D. 714. . 1139 

E. V. Landulph (1834), 1 M. & Eob. 393 Ill 

E. V. Langbridge (1849), 1 Den. 448 ; 2 C. & K. 975 ; T. & M. 146 ; 3 Cox, 

C. C. 465 ; 3 New Sess. Cas. 645 ; 18 L. J. M. C. 198 ; 13 Jur. 545 ... . 335 
E. V. Langmead (1864), L. & C. 427 ; 9 Cox, C. C. 464 ; 10 L. T. 350 .. 120 
E. V. Langton (1877), 2 Q. B. D. 296 ; 46 L. J. M. C. 136 ; 35 L. T. 527 ; 

13 Cox, C. C. 349 150, 294, 925 

E. V. Larkin (1854), 6 Cox, C. C. 377 ; Dears. C. C. 365 ; 2 C. L. E. 776 ; 

23 L. J. M. C. 126 ; 18 Jur. 539 198 

E. V. Laugher (1846), 2 C. & K. 225 663, 572 

E. V. Lavey (1850), 3 C. & K. 26 47 

E. 'J. Lavin (1843), Ir. Cir. E. 813 569, 918 

E. V. Layer (1722), 16 How. St. Tr. 214 680, 626, 967, 971 

E. V. Leatham (1861), 3 E. & E. 658 962, 969 

E. V. Ledbetter (1850), 3 C. & K. 108 327 

E. -!■. Lee (1766), cited 3 Euss. C. & M. 72 626 

E. V. Lee (1838), 2 Lew. C. C. 15'4 950 

E. V. Lee (1864), 4 F. & F. 63 326, 336, 337 

E. V. Leeds (1847), 9 Q. B. 910 1140 

E. V. Leicester JJ. (1825), 4B. & C. 892 992, 993 

E. !<. Leisrh (1840), 10 A. & E. 398 397, 404, 406, 1109 

E.t<. Leominster (1845), 6 Q. B. 640; 13 L.J. M. C. 54 728 

E. v. Leonard (1848), 1 Den. 304 ; 3 Cox, C. C. 284 ; 2 C. & K. 514 .... 204 

E. v. Levy (1819), 2 Stark. E. 458 210, 237, 238 

E. V. Levy (1858), 8 Cox, C. C. 73 1071 

E. V. Lewen(1836), 2 Lew. C. C. 161 824 

E. V. Lewis (1802), 4 Esp. 226 ; 2 T. E. 617 947, 967 

E. ■„. Lewis (1833), 9 C. & P. 161 81, 682, 583 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clxi 

PAGE 

R. V.Lewis (1840), Aroh. Cr. PI. 651 246 

E. V. Lewis (1857), Dears. & B. 326 821, 824 

E. ■v. Lightfoot (1856), 6 E. & B. 822 ; 25 L. J. M. C. 115 884 

E. ». LiUeshall (1845), 7 Q. B. 158 ; 14 L. J. M. C. 97 168 

E. V. Lingate (1815), 1 Ph. Ev. 410 567 

R. V. Little (1758), 1 Burr. 613 131 

R. V. Liverpool, Mayor of (1768), 4 Burr. 2244 1137 

R. V. Llaufaethly (1853), 2 E. & B. 940 320 

E. V. Llanguunor (1831), 2 B. & Ad. 616 735 

E. «!. Lloyd (1830), 4 C. & P. 233 465 

R. V. Lloyd (1834), 6 C. & P. 393 668 

E. V. Lookhart (1785), 1 Lea. C. 0. 386 685 

E. «). LoUey (1812), E. &E. 237 ; 15 R. R. 737 1143 

E. V. Lend. & North'- West. Ry. Co. (1854), 3 E. & B. 443 1102 

E. V. Lond. & St. Kath. Dock Co. (1874), 44 L. J. Q. B. 4 ; 31 L. T. 588 ; 

23 W. R. 136 1001 

R. V. Loud. & South Coast Ry. Co. (1851), 20 L. J. M. C. 145 ; 15 Q. B. 

313 520 

R. •■-. Long (1833), 6 C. &P. 179 237, 569 

R. V. Long Buckby (1806), 7 East, 45 ; 3 Smith, 92 ; 8 E. R. 595 . . . .131, 133 

R. •./. Loom (1827), 1 Moo. C. C. 160 214 

E. V. Loughrau (1839), 1 Crawf. & D. C. C. 79 873 

E. V. Lowe (1883), 15 Cox, C. C. 286 ; 62 L. J. M. C. 122; 48 L. T. 

768 1008 

E. V. Lower Heyford (1840), cited 2 Smith L. C. 363 438 

E. V. Lubbenham (1834), 6 JB. & Ad. 968 1170 

E. „. Luoas (1808), 10 East, 235 ; 10 E. E. 283 993, 994 

E. V. Luokhurst (1853), 1 Dears. C. C. 245 ; 23 L. J. M. C. 18. . . .563, 568, 571 

E. V. Luffe (1807), 8 East, 202 ; 9 E. E. 406 ; Preface vii 15, 101, 621, 622 

E. V. Lumley (1869), L. E. 1 C. C. 196 ; 38 L. J. M. C. 86 ; 11 Cox, C. C. 

274 ; 20 L. T. 454 ; 17 W. E. 085 106, 170 

E. V. Lunny (1854), 6 Cox, C. C. 477 375 

E. V. Lyon (1824), Ey. & M. 151 209 

E. V. M'Anemey (1841), Ir. Cir. E. 270 216 

E. V. Macclesfield (1726), 16 How. St. Tr. 1252, 1391 900 

E. V. Macclesfield (1849), 13 Q. B. 881 1140 

E. V. Macclesfield, Ld. (1725), 16 How. St. Tr. 1146 960 

B. V. M'Cafferty (1866-7), I. E. 1 C. L. 363 385 

E. V. M'Conkey (1841), Ir. Cir. E. 77 213 

E. V. M'Cue(1831), Jebb, C. C. 120 1117 

E. •«,. M'Gulley (1838), 2 Moo. C. C. 34 ; 2 Lew. C. C. 272 214 

E. ■:,. M'Donald (1841), Arm. M. & 0. 112 1018 

E. ■„. M'Govem (1852), 5 Cox, C. C. 506 579 

E. «/. Maohen (1849), 14 Q. B. 74 ; 18 L. J. M. C. 213 1140, 1169, 1160 

E. V. M'Hugh (1857), 7 Cox, C. C. 483 582 

E. i,. Mackay (1868), 11 Cox, C. C. 148 468 

E. V. MoKenna (1842), Ir. Cir. R. 416 202, 382 

E. V. Macpherson (1869), 39 L. J. P. C. 69 ; L. E. 3 P. C. 268 ; 23 L. T. 

101 ; 18 W. E. 1063 203 

E. V. M'Pherson (1857), 26 L. J. M. C. 134 ; Dears. & B. 197 206 

E. V. Magill (1799), cited McNally, Ev. 38 669 

E. V. MagQl (1842), Ir. Cir. R. 418 636 

E. V. Mainwaring (1857), 26 L. J. M. C. 10 ; 10 Cox, C. C. 192 ; Dears. 

&B. 132; 2 Jur. N. S. 1236 129, 295, 1053, 1056 

E. V. Mainwaring (1858), E. B. & E. 474 ; 27 L. J. M. C. 278 78 

E. V. Mallett (1830), cited 3 Euss. C. & M. 492 676 

E. V. Mallory (1884), 13 Q. B. D. 33 ; 63 L. J. M. C. 134 ; 50 L. T. 429 ; 

32 W. E. 721 ; 48 J. P. 487 ; 16 Cox, C. C. 456 498 

E. 1!. Manning (1849), 2 C. & K. 887, 903 165 

E. V. Mansfield (1841), 1 Q. B. 444 ; 1 G. & D. 7 ; 6 Jur. 605 .. . 101, 106, .422, 

621 
R. 4). Mansfield (1881), 14 Cox, 639 571 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



clxii TABLE 01? CASES CITED. 

R. V. Mariquita & New Granada Mining Co. (1858), 28 L. J. Q. B. 67 ; 1 

El. & El. 289 ; 5 Jur. N. 8. 725 1001 

E. V. Marley (1842), cited 2 Russ. C. & M. 289 203 

R. V. Marsden (1829), M. & M. 439 276 

R. V. Marsh (1837), 6 A. & E. 236; 1 N. & P. 187; 2 H. & W. 366 ...615, 617 

R. V. Marshall (1841), C. & Marsh. 147 329 

R. V. Martin (1809), 2 Camp. 100 ; 11 R. R. 674 1050, 1174 

R. V. Martin (1832), 5 C. & P. 128 213, 257 

R. V. Martin (1834), 6 C. & P. 562 950 

R. V. Martin (1869), L. R. 1 C. C. 214 ; 11 Cox, 0. C. 343 251 

R. V. Martin (1872), L. R. 1 C. C. 378 ; 12 Cox, C. C. 204 ; 41 L. J. M. C. 

113 365 

R. V. Mashiter (1837), 6 A. & E. 153 ; 1 N. & P. 314 763 

R. V. Mathews (1793), 5 T. R. 162 " 203 

R. V. May (1880), 49 L. J. M. C. 67 ; 5 Q. B. D. 382 1160 

R. V. Mayhew (1834), 6 C. & P. 315 627 

R. V. Mazagora (1815), R. & R. 291 80 

R. V. Mead (1758), 1 Burr. 542 893 

R. V. Mead (1824), 2 B. & C. 608 ; 4 Dowl. & R. 120 465 

R. V. Medley (1834), 6 C. & P. 292 107 

R. V. Megson (1840), 9 C. & P. 420 375, 468 

R. V. Meroeron (1818), 2 Stark. E. 366 583 

R. V. Merch. Tailors' Co. (1831), 2 B. & Ad. 128 993, 994, 995 

R. V. Merthyr Tidvil (1830), 1 B. & Ad. 29 285 

R. V. Middlehurst (1757), 1 Burr. 400 203 

R. V. Middlesex (1850), 1 L. M. & P. 621 727 

R. V. Middlesex JJ., Re Bowman (1834), 5 B. & Ad. 1113 988 

R. V. Midlam (1765), 3 Burr. 1720 992 

R. ;;. MiUard (1813), R. & R. 245 246, 247 

R. V. Miller (1772), 2 W. Bl. 797 14 

R. «). MiUer (1850), 4 Cox, C. C. 166 336 

K. V. Miller (1879), 14 Cox, C. C. 356 1129 

R. V. Mills (1833), 6 C. & P. 146 563, 571 

R. V. Milne (undated), cited 2 B. & Aid. 606, n. (a) 909 

R. V. Milnes (I860), 2 F. & F. 10 1014 

R. V. Milton (1843), 1 C. & K. 58 403 

R. v. Minton (1785), 2 East, P. C. 1021 202, 468 

R. V. Mitchell (1818), 2 Stark. Ev. 307, n. (»-) 148 

R. V. Mitchell (1852), 2 Den. 468 ; 3 C. &K. 181 ; 21 L.J, M. C. 135. .206, 1129 

R. V. MitcheU, (1892) 17 Cox, C. C. 503 Add. [335], 339, 465, 468, 523 

R. ■„. Mockford (1868), 11 Cox, C. C. 10 ; 17 L. T. 582 ; 16 W. R. 375 . . 121 

R. V. Mogg (1830), 4 C. & P. 364 248 

R. ■„. Moore (1831), cited 3 Rnss. C. & M. 509 579 

R. v. Moore (1852), 3 C. & K. 153; 2 Den: C. C. 522; 21 L. J. M. C. 199.. 563 
R. V. Moore, (1892) 61 L. J. M. 0. 80 ; 66 L. T. 125 ; 40 "W. R. 304 ; 

56 J. P. 345; 17 Cox, C. C. 458 902, 903 

R. V. Mooree (1836), 7 C. & P. 270 634 

R. V. Moors (1801), 6 East, 421, n 295 

R. «/. Morgan (1852), 6 Cox, CO. 107 294 

R. •.,. Morgan (1875), 14 Cox, C. C. 337 467 

R. »- Morris (1761), 2 Burr. 1189 1013 

R. ■„. Morris (1792), 4 T. R. 652 131 

R. V. Morris (1840), 9 C. & P. 347 211 

R. V. Morris (1867), 35 L. J. M. C. 85; L. R. 1 C. C. 93 1126, 1131 

R. a. Morse (1838), 8 C. & P. 605 , 578 

R. V. Mortlock (1845), 7 Q- B. 459 ; 2 New Sess. Cas. 108 ; 14 L. J. M. C. 

153 ; 9 Jur. 621 317 

R. V. Morton (1815), 4 M. & Sel. 48 303 

K. V. Morton (1843), 2 M. & Rob. 514 563, 672 

R. V. Mosey (1784), 1 Lea. 265, n 683 

R. V. Mosley (182.5), 1 Moo. 0. C. 97 213,467, 468 

R. </. Mothersell (1707), 1 Str. 93 1050, 1175 

R. i,'. Mudie (1831), 1 M. & Rob. 128 62S 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clxiii 

PAQB 

R. V. Munslow (1895), 15 E. (Mar.) 382 ; (1895) 1 Q. B. 758 ; 72 L. T. 301 ; 

43W. E. 495 Add. [80] 

E. V. Murlis (1829), M. & M. 615 942 

E. V. Murphy (1753), 9 How. St. Tr. 724 974 

E. v. Murphy (1837), 8 C. & P. 310 148, 383, 384, 917, 921, 1220 

E. V. Murphy (1841), 1 Arm. M. & 0. 206 468, 945 

E. «. Murphy (1859 , 28 L. J. C. P. 63 1127 

E. 41. Murphy (1875), 13 Cox, C. C. 298 80 

E. «;. Musiiot (1713), 10 Mod. 194 627 

E. V. Musson (1858), 27 L. J. M. 0. 100; 8 E. & B. 900; 4 Jur. N. S. 

Ill 112 

E. ;;. Mytton (1860), 2 E. & E. 557 ; 29 L. J. M. 0. 109 396, 430 

E. V. Napper (1824), 1 Moo. 0. C. 44 209 

E. V. Neal (1836), 7 C. & P. 168 635 

E. V. Nether HaUam (1854), 6 Cox, C. C. 435 1141 

E. V. Netherthong (1813), 2 M. & Sal. 337 87, 432 

E. V. Neville (1791), Pea. E. 91 549, 552 

E. V. Neville (1852), 6 Cox, 0. C. 69 198 

E. v. Newbonlt (1872), 41 L. J. M. C. 63 ; L. E. 1 C. C. 344 ; 2.3 L. T. 

883 ; 20 W. E. 343 ; 12 Cox, C. C. 148 217 

E. V. Newman (1822, should be 1853), 1 E. & B. 2C8 ; 3 C. & Kir. 252; 

22 L. J. Q. B. 166 587 

E. !). Newman (1852), 2 Den. 390; 3 C. & K. 240 623, 918, 1034 

E. V. Newton (1843), 2 M. & Eob. 603 293 

E. ». Newton 1844), 1 C. & K. 480 147 

E. V. Newton (1859), 1 F. &E. 641 335 

n.v. Nicholas (1846), 2 C. & K. 246 367, 898 

E. V. NichoUs (1838), 1 F. & F. 51 247 

E. V. Nicolas (1852), 6 Cox, C. C. 121 468 

E. «. Nisbett (1853), 6 Cox, C. C. 320 246 

E. V. Noakes (1832), 5 C. & P. 326 635 

E. ». Northleach and Witney Eoads Trustees (1834), 3 A. & E. 477; 5 N. & 

M. 344 999 

E. ». North Petherton (1826), 5 B. & C. 508 ; 8 D. & E. 325 1170 

E. V. North Eedbum (1784), Cald. 452 305 

E. V. Norton (1823), E. & E. 510 216 

E. V. Norwich Eoad Trustees (1836), 5 A. & E. 563 ; 1 N. & P. 32 ; 2 H. 

& "W. 385 1 137 

E. V. Nuneham Courtney (1801), 1 East, 373 368 

E. V. Nute (1842), 3 Euss. C. & M. 458 ; 6 Peters, Abr. 82 567 

E. V. O'Coigly (1798), 26 How. St. Tr. 1351 967 

E. V. O'Connell (1843-4), Arm. & T. 163 290, 296, 383, 384, 613 

E. V. Oddy (1851), 2 Den. 264 ; T. &. M. 593 ; 6 Cox, C. C. 210 ; 20 L. J. 

M. G. 108 ; 15 Jur. 517 247 

E. V. O'Donnell (1835), 7 C. & P. 138 829 

E. V. O'Donnell (1857), 7 Cox, C. 0. 337 883 

E. V. Oliver (1860), 1 BeU, 218 ; 8 Cox, C. C. 384 ; 30 L. J. M. C. 12 ; 6 

Jur. N. S. 1214 ? 3 D. T. 311 ; 9 W. E. 60 206 

E. V. Olney, (1813), 1 M. & Sel. 387 755 

E. V. Omant (1854), 6 Cox, C. C. 466 . . ; 332 

E. V. O'NeiU (1871), I. E. 6 C. L. 1 210 

E.«. Onslow and Whalley (1873), 12 Cox, C. C. 358 873 

E. V. Orchard (1838), 8 C. & P. 565 218, 943 

E. V. O'EeiUy (1832), Ir. Cir. E. 718 570 

E. V. Osborne (1837), 8 0. & P. 113 336 

E. V. Osborne (1842), C. & Marsh. 624 375 

E. V. Osman (1881), 15 Cox, C. C. 1 468 

E. V. Otway (1849), llr. C. L. E. 69 268 

E. (;. Oulton(1835), 5B. & Ad. 9.i8; 3N. &M. 62; 3L. J. M. C. 33 .. 168 

E. V. Owen (1752), 18 How. St. Tr. 1223, 1227 45 

E. V. Owen (1826), 1 Moo. C. C. 118 209 

E. V. Owen (1830), 4 C. & P. 236 164 

E. V. Owen (1840), 9 C. & P. 238 580, 582 

Vol, I, ends with page 635, 



clxiy TABLE OF CASES CITED, 

PAGE 

E. V. Owen (1888), 20 Q. B. D. 829 ; 36 "W. R. 575 ; 57 L. J. M. 0. 46 ; 

58 L. T. 780 ; 62 J. P. 582 ; 16 Cox, C. C. 397 885 

R.I'. Oxford (1819), B. & R. 382 202 

R. V. Oxford (1840), 9 C. & P. 525 213 

R. V. Packer (1829), cited 3 Russ. 0. & M. 505 579 

R. V. Padstow (1832), 4 B. & Ad. 208 ; 1 N. & M. 9 ; 2 L. J. M. C. 15 . . 287 

R. a. Page (1788), 6 Esp. 83 84, 283 

R. V. Page (1798), 2 Esp. 649, n 1034 

R. V. Pain (1826), 7 D. & R. 678 ; 5 B. & C. 251 131 

R. V. Paine (1695), 1 Salt. 281 ; 5 Mod. 163 333 

R. V. Paine (1834), 7 C. & P. 136 821 

R. i>. Painter (1846), 2 C. & K. 319 335 

R. V. Palmer (1851), 5 Cox, C. C. 236 958 

R. t!. Pamenter (1872), 12 Cox, C. C. 177 669, Add. [590] 

R. V. Parker (1783), 3 Doug. 242 976 

R. V. Parker (1842), 0. & Mareh. 639 628, 630 

R. V. Parker (1861), L. & Care, 42 ; 8 Cox, C. C. 465 563 

R. V. Parker (1 862), York Summer Assizes, 1862 332 

R. V. Parker (1864), 33 L. J. M. 0. 136 ; 1 L. & C. 459 ; 5 Cox, C. C. 475 78 
R. V. Parker (1870), L. R. 1 C. C. 226 ; 11 Cox, C. C. 478 ; 39 L. J. M. C. 

60 ; 21 L. T. 724 ; 18 W. R. 353 336 

R. I-. Parratt (1831), 4 C. &. P. 670 563, 571 

B. V. Parry (1837), 7 C. & P. 836 238, 985, 1127 

R. V. Parsons (1866), 35 L. J. M. C. 167 ; L. R. 1 C. C. 24 ; 10 Cox, C. C. 

243 1071 

R. V. Partridge (1836), 7 C. & P. 551 120, 671 

R. V. Payne (1872), 41 L. J. M. C. 65 ; 12 Cox, C. C. 118 ; L. R. 1 C. C. 

349 883 

R. V. Peace (1820), 3 B. & Aid. 579 217 

R. V. Peacock (1870), 12 Cox, 0. C. 21 331 

B. V. Pearoe (1791), Pea. 75 241 

B. V. Pearce (1840), 9 C. & P. 668 893 

R. V. Peat (1838), 2 Lew. C. C. 288 890 

B. p. Pedley (1784), 1 Lea. C. 0. 325 930 

B. V. Peel (1860), 2 P. & F. 21 468, 959 

B. V Pegler (1833), 5 C. & P. 621 960 

B. V. Peuge (1793), Nolan's Bep. 176 1139 

B. V. Perlrin (1840), 2 Moo. C. C. 139 897 

B. V. Perkins (1840), 9 C. & P. 395 ; 2 Moo. C. C. 135 408 

E. V. Perranzabvdoe (1844), 3 Q. B. 400 ; 3 G-. & D. 315 ; 13 L. J. M. C. 

47 788, 1139 

B. V. Perry (undated), cited By. & M. 352 888 

B. V. Petcherini (1856), 7 Cox, 0. C. 79 383 

R. V. Petrie (1855), 24 L. J. Q. B. 167 ; 4 E. & B. 737 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 752 124 

B. I.. PhiKps (1837), 8 C. & P. 736 100 

R. V. Phillips (1818), R. & B. 369 202,283 

B. V. Phillips (1829), cited 3 Buss. C. & M. 505 579 

R. V. Phillips (1829), 1 Lew. C. C. 106 247 

B. V. Phillpott (1861), 2 Den. 308 1045 

B. V. Philp (1830), 1 Moo. C. 0. 263..-. 80 

B. V. Pickford (1830), 4 C. & P. 227 46 

B. V. Picton (1806), 30 How. St. Tr. 536—540, 864—870 51, 936, 937 

R. V. Piddlehinton (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 460 306 

R. V. Pike (1829), 3 0. & P. 598 467 

R. V. Pikesley (1839), 9 C. & P. 124 577, 580 

R. '\ Pilkington (1844), 5 Q. B. 662; 1 New Sess. Cas. 90 ; 13 L. J. M. C. 

61 ; 8 Jur. 267 153 

R. V. Pitcher (1817), 1 C. & P. 85 947 

B. V. Pitts (1839), 8 C. &P. 771 216 

B. V. Plant (1836), 7 0. & P. 575; 1 Moo. C. C. 477 1127 

B. V. Plumer (1814), B. & B. 264 154 

R. V. Plummer (1844), 1 C. & K. 604 ; 8 Jur. 921 334 

B. V. Plymouth, &o. By. Co. (1889), 37 W. R. 334 916 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OP CASES CITED, clxv 

PAGE 

R. V. Pollard (1838), 8 0. & P. 553 165 

E. V. Ponsonby (1844), 3 Q. B. 14 ; 1 Gale & D. 713 ; 6 Jur. 642 4 

E. V. Pook(1871), 13 Cox, C. C. 172 378 

E. «;. Potter (1829), 7 C. & P. 660, n 334 

R. 41. Pountney (1836), 7 C. & P. 302 663, 664 

R. ■</. Povey (1855), 22 L. J. M. C. 19 ; Dears. C. C. 32 ; 17 Jur. 120.. 7, 936, 937 

E. -r. Powell (1854), 3 B. & B. 377 ; 23 L. J. Q. B. 199 122 

E. V. Po-wis, Earl (1678-85), 7 How. St. Tr. 1384, 1458, 1552 900 

E. V. Pressly (1833), 3 C. & P. 183 676, 580 

E. I.. Preston (1848), 12 Q. B. 816, 825, 826 131 

E. V. Preston, Ld. (1791), 12 How. St. Tr. 658 ; Post. C. L. 228 900, 985 

E. V. Price (1837), 8 0. & P. 19 ; 7 Cox, C. C. 405 166, 958 

E. V. Pringle (1840), 2 M. & Eob. 276 16, 18 

E. V. Pritohard (1867), 30 L. J. M. C. 169 ; L. & C. 34 ; 8 Cox, C. C. 461 ; 

7 Jur. N, S. 657 ; 4 L. T. 340 ; 9 W. E. 971 199 

E. V. Pnddifoot (1829), 1 Moo. C. C. 247 214 

E. V. Purefoy (1794), Pea. Evid. 61 n. (6th ed.) 340 

E. V. PumeU (1748-9), 1 W. Bl. 37 ; 1 Wils. 239 997 

E. V. Pye (1790), 2 East, P. C. 785 202 

E. V. Qualter (1854), 6 Cox, C. C. 357 468 

E. V. Queen'sCty.JJ.,EeEeehan(1882),10L.E.Ir.294; 16Cox,C.C.149..483,884 

E. V. Quigley (1842), Ir. Cir. E. 677 375 

E. ». Quin (1863), 3E. &E. 818 969 

E. V. Eadley (1849), 1 Den. 450 ; 3 New Sese. Cas. 651 ; T. & M. 144 ; 

2 0. & K. 974 ; 3 Cox, C. C. 460 ; 18 L. J. M. C. 184 ; 13 Jur. 544 ... 202 
E. ■„. Eamsay (1883), 15 Cox, C. C. 231 ; 1 C. & E. 126 ; 48 L. T. 733. .107, 687 

E. V. Eamsbottom (1787), 1 Lea. 25, n 1045 

E. •</. Eamsden (1827), 2 C. & P. 604 927, 960 

E. ^. Eatcllflfe (1832), 1 Lewiu, C. C. 122 1102 

E. V. Eatoliflee Culey (1846), 2 New Sess. Cas. 352 578 

E. »-. Eawden (1828), 8 B. & C. 708 ; 3 M. & E. 426 284 

E. V. Eawden (1834), 2 A. & E. 158 303 

E. V. Eead (1839), 9 A. & E. 619 ; 1 P. & D. 413 630 

E. V. Eeader (1830), 4 C. & P. 245 ; 1 M. C. C. 239 1140 

E. V. Eeading (1679), 7 How. St. Tr. 796 965 

E. D. Eeading (1734), Cases temp. Hardw. 79 621, 622 

E. V. Eeading (l836), 7 C. & P. 649 678 

E. *. Eeaney (1857), Dears. & Bell, 161; 26 L. J. M. C. 43 ; 7Cox, C.C. 209.. 468 

E. ».. Eearden (1864), 4 E. & P. 76 236 

E. «-. Eeason (1734), 1 Str. 499 ; 16 How. St. Tr. 1 469, 470, 679 

E. ■</. Eeason (1872), 12 Cox, C. C. 228 672 

E. .«/. Eeed(1829), M. &M. 403 283, 880 

E. «. Eees (1789, should be 1834), 6 C. & P. 606 148 

E. ^. Eees (1832), 6 C. & P. 302 824 

E. „. Eees (1836), 7 C. & P. 569 569 

E. „. Reeve (1872), L. E. 1 C. C. 362 ; 41 L. J. M. C. 92; 12 Cox, C. C.179. . 672 

E. «,. Eeg. of Deeds for Middlesex (1869), 28 L. J. Q. B. 77 731 

E. V. Eeid (1829), M. & M. 403 685 

E. 4». Eeilly (1843), Ir. Cir. E. 795 1033 

R. ■</. Eemnant (1807), 5 T. R. 169 -. 959 

R. •.,. Rhodes (1742), 1 Lea. C. C. 24 1049, 1172 

E. V. Richards (1828), 8 B. & C. 420 ; 824 

E. V. Eiohards (1832), 1 M. & Eob. 177 567, 571 . 

R. «/. Richards (1866), 4 P. & P. 860 336 

R. V. Richardson (1860), 2 P. & F. 343 ; 8 Cox, C. C. 848 209 

R. «/. Richardson (1863), 3 P. & P. 693 614 

E. «.. Eickman (1789), 2 East, P. C. 1034 121 

- E. «-. Eidley (1823), E. & E. 615 209 

E. •</. Eigg (1866), 4 P. & P. 1085 340 

E. V. Eiley (1851), 3 C. & K. 116 336 

R. V. Riley (1887), 18 Q. B. D. 481 : 56 L. J. M. C. 52 ; 66 L. T. 371 ; 

35 W. R. 382 950 

E. V. Ring (1800), 8 T. R. 585 ; 5 R. R. 478 833 

Vol. I. ends with page fiSfi. 



Clxvi TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAGE 

E. V. Rishworth (1842), 2 Q. B. 487 ; 1 G. & D. 597 ; 11 L. J. M. C. 34 . . 414 

E. -I/. Eivers (1835), 7 C. &P. 177 283, 580 

E. ». Roadley (1880), 14 Cox, C. C. 463 ; 49 L. J. M. C. 88 ; 42L.T. 616.. lOO 

E. V. Eoberts (1808), 1 Camp. 399 263 

E. V. Eoberts (1848), 2 C. & Kir. 614 630 

U.v. Eoberts (1873), 14 Cox, C. C. 101 ; 147, 1023 

E. V. Eobey (1833), 6 C. & P. 662 826 

E. V. Eobins (1843), 2 M. & Eob. 612 257, 951 

E. V. Eobinson (1796), 2 Leach, C. C. 765, 765 46, 248 

E. V. Eobinson (1817), Holt, N. P. E. 695 215 

E. V. Eobinson (1828), 1 Lew. C. C. 129 826 

E. V. Eobinson (1839), 1 Crawf. & D. C. C. 329 1031, 1033, 1034 

E. V. Eobinson (1840), 12 A. & E. 672 ; 4 P. & D. 391 1073 

E. V. Eobinson (1867), L. E. 1 0. C. 80 ; 36 L. J. M. C. 78 966 

E. V. Eoche(1775), 1 Lea. 134; B. N. P. 246 1153 

'R.v. Eoche (1841), C. & Mar. 341 676, 585 

E. V. Eoddam (1777), 2 Cowp. 672 838 

E. V. Eoden (1874), 12 Cox, C. C. 630 , 237 

E. v. Eoebuek (1855), Dears. & B. 24 ; 7 Cox, C. C. 126 ; 25 L. J. M. C. 

101 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 597 247 

E. V. Eook (1752), 1 WUs. 340 621 

E. V. Eookwood (1696), 13 How. St. Tr. 211 971, 973 

E. V. Eooney (1836), 7 C. & P. 517 241, 829 

E. V. Eosa Eue (1876), 13 Cox, C. C. 209 566 

R. V. Eosewell (1684), 10 How. St. Tr. 190 920, 960 

E. V. Rosier (1821), 1 Ph. Et. 410 667 

R. V. Eosser (1836), 7 C. & P. 648 899 

R. V. Row (1809), E. & E. 153 666 

E. V. Eowland (1826), Ry. & M. 401 883 

R. V. Rowley (1825), 1 Moo. C. C. Ill 364 

R. V. Rowton (1865), 34 L. J. M. C. 57 ; L. & Cave, .520 ; 10 Cox, C. C. 

26 ; 11 L. T. 745 ; 13 W. R. 436 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 325 249, 251 

R. .,. Eudd (1775), 1 Lea. C. U. 127 889 

E. V. Eudge (1805), Pea. Add. Cas. 232 ; 4 R. R. 906 948 

E. V. Eudge (1874), 13 Cox, C. C. 17 1128 

E. ■«. Eussell (1827), 6 B. & C. 566 47 

E. V. EusseU, Ld. J. (1839), 7 Dowl. 793 832 

E. 0. Euston (1786), 1 Lea. C. C. 408 897 

R. V. Ryan (1839), 2 M. & Rob. 213 81 

R. 11. Ryland (1868), 11 Cox, C. C. 101 ; 18 L. T. 538; 16 W. E. 941.... 206 

E. f. Ryle (1841), 9M. AW. 227; 1 D. N. S. 431; 6 Jur. 238 349 

E. V. Eymer (1877), 2 Q. B. D. 136 ; 46 L. J. M. C. 108 ; 35 L. T. 774 ; 

25 W. E. 415 ; 13 Cox, C. C. 378 162 

E. V. Eymes (1863), 3 C. & K. 326 198 

E. V. Ryton(1792), 6 T. R. 259 87, 432 

R. ». Sadler (1830), 4 C. & P. 218 815 

R. V. Saffron HUl (1852), 22 L. J. M. C. 22 ; 1 E. & B. 93 302, 303 

R. V. St. Andrew, Pershore (1828), 8 B. & C. 679 153 

E. V. St. Anne, Westminster (1847), 2 New Sess. Cas. 529 ; 9 Q. B. 884; 

16L. J. M. C. 33 1138, 1140 

E. V. St. Asaph, Dean of (1783), 21 How. St. Tr. 1039, 1040 23, 45 

E. V. St. George (1840), 9 0. & P. 488 974 

E. *. St. George, Bloomsbury (1866), 4 E. & B. 620 ; 24 L. J. M. C. 49 . . 1136 

E. V. St. Giles (1863), 22 L.J. M. C. 64; 1 E. & B. 642 1214, 1219 

E. V. St. GQes-in-the-Fields (1844). 6 Q. B. 872 ; D. & M. 110 ; 1 New 

Sess. Cas. 137 ; 13 L. J. M. C. 89 ; 8 Jur. 467 521 

E. V. St. John (1839), 9 C. & P. 40 209 

E. V. St. Katherine (1831), 5 B. c& Ad. 970, n 1170 

E. «-•. St. Martin's, Leicester (1834), 2 A. & E. 210 ; 4 N. & M. 202 . .289, 924, 

926 927 

R. V. St. Mary, Lambeth (1796), 6 T. E. 615 ; 8 E. E. 236, 240 'll06 

R. 1). St. Mary, Lambeth (1846), 7 Q. B. 587 ; 2 New Sess. Cas. 36 1139 

R. V. St. Marylebone (1824), 4 Dowl. & R. 476 149 



The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clxvii 

PAOH 

R. V. St. Maryletone (1836), 5 A. & E. 268 993 

R. V. St. Mary Magdalen (1853), 2 E. & B. 809 ; 23 L. J. M. C. 1 ; 17 

Jur. 1075 131 

R. V. St. Mary, Warwiok (1853), 22 L. J. M. 0. 109 ; 1 El. & Bl. 816 ; 1 

C. L. R. 192 ; 17 Jur. 551 454 

R. 1/. St. Maurice (1851), 16 Q. B. 908 ; 20 L. J. M. 0. 221 ; 15 Jur. 559. . 17 

R. V. St. Michael's (1848), 12 Q. B. 96 ; 3 New Sess. Cas. 260 578 

R. V. St. Pancras (1794), Pea. R. 220 1109, 1141 

R. V. St. Paul, Covent Garden (1845), 7 Q. B. 232 134 

R. V. St. "Weonard's (1834), 6 0. & P. 682 209 

R. V. Salisbury (1838), 8 A. & E. 716 ; 3 N. & P. 476 ; 7 L. J. M. C. 110. . 683 

R. V. Salt (1862), 3 F. & E. 834 246 

R. V. Salter (1804), 6 Esp. 126 248 

R. V. Sansome (1860), 1 Den. 545 677, 680 

R. V. Savage (1831), 6 0. & P. 143 329 

R. 0. Savage (1876), 13 Cox, C. 0. 178 293, 937 

R. V. Soaife (1851), 17 Q. B. 242 ; 2 Den. 281 ; 5 Cox, C. C. 243 ; 20 L. J. 

M. C. 229 ; 16 Jur. 607 328, 330, 332, 469 

R. ■„. Soallan (1838), Craw. & D. Abr. Cas. 340 468, 470 

R. V. Scammonden (1789), 3 T. R. 476 ; 1 R. R. 752 748, 756 

R. V. Sohlesinger (1847), 10 Q. B. 670 ; 2 Cox, C. C. 200 ; 17 L. J. M. C. 

29 ; 12 Jur. 283 930 

R. «. Scott (1790), 3 T. R. 604 792 

R. V. Scott (1856), 25 L. J. M. C. 128 ; Dears. & B. C. 0. 47 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 

1096 583, 966 

R. v. Scott (1877), L, R. 2 Q. B. D. 415 ; 46 L. J. M. C. 259 ; 13 Cox, 

694 1041, 1042, 1097 

R. V. Searle (1831), 1 M. & Rob. 75 934 

R. V. Sedgeley (1831), 2 B. & Ad. 65 50 

R. V. SeUers (1796), Carr. Cr. L. 233 , 469 

R. V. Serjeant (1826), Ry. & M. 352 888, 889, 893 

R. V. Serva (1845), 2 C. & K. 56 906 

R. V. Sewell (1846), 8 Q. B. 161 ; 15 L. J. Q. B. 49 ; 10 Jur. 48 1178 

R. -v. Sexton (1822), cited in Joy on Conf. 17—19 568, 576 

R. V. Shaftesbury (1681), 8 How. St. Tr. 817 965 

R. V. Shaw (1823), R. & R. 526 1032, 1097 

R. V. Shaw (1834), 6 C. & P. 372 568, 569 

R. t). Shaw (1867), L. & Cave, 579; 10 Cox, C. C. 66; 34L. J.M. C. 169. . 627 

R. V. Sheehan (1826), Jebb, C. C. 64 ,633, 634 

R. V. Sheen (1837), 2 C. & P. 765 215 

R. V. Sheering (1836), 7 C. & P. 440 821 

R. V. Shellard (1840), 9 C. & P. 279 956, 958 

R. «. Shelley (1789), 3 T. R. 142; IR. R. 673 993, 997 

R. V. Shepherd (1836), 7 C. & P. 579 663, 672 

R. V. Shepherd (1868), 37 L. J. M. C. 45; L. R. 1 C. C. 118 ; 11 Cox, 

C. C. 119 ; 17 L. T. 482 ; 16 W. R. 373 211 

R. V. Sheppard (1806), R. & R. 169 80 

R. V. Shfrman (1736), Cases temp. Hardw. 303 883 

R. V. Shipley (1784), 4 Doug. 73,177 82 

R. t>. Shott (1851), 3C. &K. 206 1128 

E. V. Shrimpton (1851), 2 Den. 319 ; 3 C. & Kir. 373 ; T. & M. 628 ; 21 

L. J. M. C. 37 ; 5 Cox, C. 0. 387 251 

R. V. Shurmer (1886), 17 Q- B. D. 323 ; 55 L. J. M. C. 153 ; 66 L. T. 126; • 

34 W. R. 666 ; 50 J. P. 743 338 

R. V. Sidney Westley (1868), 11 Cox, C. C. 139 1073 ' 

R. V. Simmonds (1823), 1 C. & P. 84 943 

R. v. Simons (1834), 6 C. & P. 541 183, 556, 669 

R. «/. Simpson (1738), 2 Ld. Eaym. 1379 17 

R. V. Simpson (1834), 1 Moo. C. C. 410 563 

R. «/. Sippet (1839), Maidstone Assizes 568 

E. ■„. Sirrell (I860), cited 2 Den. 267 247 

R. V. Skeen and Freeman (1859), 28 L. J. M. C. 91 ; 8 Cox, C. C. 143 ; 
Bell, C. C. 97 ; 7 W. R. 256 ; 5 J nr. N. S. 151 963 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



Clxviii TABLE OP CASES CITED. 

FAQB 

R. 4). Skinner (1772)^ LofEt, 56 869 

E. V. Slaney (1832), 5 C. & P. 213 960 

E. V. Slator (1881), 8 Q. B. D. 267 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 246 ; 30 W. R. 410 ;• 

46 J. P. 694 962 

R. V. Slaughter (1831), 4 C. & P. 644, n. (i) 564 

R. V. Slawstone (1852), 18 Q. B. 388 ; 21 L. J, M. C. 145 ; 16 Jur. 1066.. 727 

R. V. Sleeman (1853), Dears. & Bell, 249 663, 565, 567 

R. V. Sleep (1861), L. & Cave, 44 ; 8 Cox, C. C. 472 ; 30 L. J. M. C. 170 ; 

7 Jur. N. S. 979 ; 4 L. T. 625 ; 9 W. R. 709 264 

E. V. Slogget (1856), Dears. & Bell, 666 ; 25 L. J. M. C. 93 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 

1096 683 

E. V. Sloman (1832), 1 Dowl. 618 832 

R. V. SmaUpieoe (1821), 2 Chitty, R. 288 996 

R. V. Smart (1841), Ir. Cir. Rep. 15 240 

R. V. Smith (1783 , 1 Lea. 288 1116 

R. V. Smith (1816), 1 Stark. R. 242 580 

R. V. Smith (1817), E. & R. 339 ; 2 Stark. R. 208 ; Holt, N. P. E. 614.. 326, 339 

E. V. Smith (1822), cited 1 Ph. Ev. 171 604 

E. ». Smith (1826), 1 Moo. C. C. 289 888 

E. V. Smith (1827), 2 C. & P. 633 246 

E. V. Smith (1828), 8 B. & C. 341 1031, 1033 

E. I). Smith (1833), 1 Moo. C. C. 402; 6 C. & P. 151 215 

E. V. Smith (1842), Ir. C. E. 459 1-65 

E. V. Smith 1845), 2 C. & K. 207 334 

E. V. Smith (1849), 1 Den. 610, 512 ; 2 C. & Kir. 882, 884 46 

E. v. Smith (1856), Dears. 559 ; 7 Cox, C. C. 5 80 

E. V. Smith (1858), Dears. & Bell, 653 ; 8 Cox, C. C. 27 165 

E. V. Smith (1866), L. & Cave, 607 ; 10 Cox, C. C. 82 ; 34 L. J. M. C. 

153 469 

E. V. Smithies (1832), 5 C. & P. 332 587 

E. V. Somersetshire JJ. (1826), 6 B. & C. 816 1136 

E. V. Sourton (1836), 6 A. & E. 180 ; 6 N. & M. 575 ; 2 H. & W. 209. . . . 621 
R. V. South Holland Drainage (1844), 8 A. & E. 437 ; 1 P. & D. 79 ; 1 W. 

W. & H. 647 1137 

R. V. Southampton (1845), 6 Q. B. 613 727 

R. V. Sow (1843), 4Q. B. 93 525, 1131 

R. V. Spencer (1824), Rv. & M. 97 1013, 1014 ' 

R. V. Spencer (1837), 7 C. & P. 776 664 

R. V. Spicer (1845), 1 C. & K. 699 ; 1 Den. C. C. 82 214 

R. V. SpUsbury (1835), 7 C. & P. 187 468, 668, 679 

R. V. Stafford (1680), 7 How. St. Tr. 1378 929 

E. V. Staffordshire JJ. (1837), 6 A. & E. 99 981, 992, 993 

E, V. Stainforth (1845), 11 Q. B. 66 ; 3 New Sess. Cas. 63 ; 17 L. J. M. C. 

25 ; 12 Jur. 95 130, 131 

E. V. Stamper (1841), 1 Q. B. 123 ; 10 L. J. M. C. 73 93 

E V. Stanley cum Wrenthorpe (1812), 15 East, 350 621 

E. ». Stanton (1861), 5 Cox, C. C. 324 1131 

R. ». Staple Eitzpaine (1842), 2 Q. B. 494 290 

E. V. Stapleton (1828), Jebb, C. C. 93 165 

R. V. Steel (1787), 1 Lea. 462 897 

E. V. Stephens (1866), L. E. 1 Q. B. 702 ; 35 L. J. Q. B. 251 ; 10 Cox, 

C. C. 340 ; 7 B. & S. 710 ; 14 L. T. 593 ; 14 W. E. 859 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 

951 107 

R. V. Stephenson (1862), 31 L. J. M. C. 147 , L. & Cave, 166 ; 9 Cox, 

C. C. 156 332, 336 

R. V. Steptoe (1830), 4 C. & P. 397 561 

R. V. Stevenson and Coulter (18$1), MS., 4th March, Ireland 883 

R. V. Sfceventon (1843), 1 C. & K. 66 209 

R. V. Stewart (1876), 13 Cox, 0. C. 296 1030 

R. V. Stoke Goldinfr (1817), 1 B. & A. 173 306 

R. V. Stoke-upon-Trent (1843), 5 Q. B. 308 ; D. & M. 357 ; 13 L J. Q. B. 

41; 8 Jur. 34 756, 768 

R. V. Stokes (1850), 4 Cox, C. C. 451 958 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clxix 

PAQE 

R. V. Stone (1796), 6 T. R. 528 382 

E. V. Stonyer (1843), 3 Russ. 0. & M. 371 237 

R. V. Stourbridge (1828), 8 B. & C. 96 ; 2 M & R. 43 304 

R. V. Stourton (1836), 5 A. & E. 180 415 

R. V. Strahan (1855), 7 Cox, C. C. 85 963 

R. V. Strand Board of Works (1864), 4 B. & S. 626 ; 33 L. J. M. 0. 33 ; 

12 W. R. 826 Ill, 112 

K. V. Stretch (1835), 4 Dowl. 30; 3 A. & E. 603 831, 832 

R. V. Stripp (1856), 7 Cux, C. C. 97 ; Dears. C. C. 648 577, 679 

R. 4). Strouer (1845), 1 C. & K. 650 943 

R. V. Stroud (1842), 1 C. & K. 187 ; 2 Moo. 0. C. 270 215 

R. V. Stubbs (1856), 25 L. J. M. C. 16 ; "Dears. C. C. 555 ; 1 Jmr. N. S. 

1115 633, 634 

R. V. Sturge (1854), 3 E. & B. 734 ; 23 L. J. M. C. 172 ; 18 Jur. 1052 . . 198 

R. V. Suddis (1801), 1 East, 306 1103 

R. V. Sullivan (1874), I. R. 8 C. L. 404 884 

R. v. Sullivan (1887), 20 L. R. Ir. 550 551 

R. v. SuUs (1800), 2 Leaoh, 861 217 

R. •^. Summers (1705), 2 East, P. C. 786 202 

R. ■„. Surrey (1844), 6 Q. B. 606 727 

R. .,. Sutolifie (1850), 4 Cox, 0. C. 270 660 

R. V. Sutton (1817), 4 M. & S. 542 3, 893, 1092 

R. V. Sutton (1835 , 3 A. & E. 597, 612 ; 5 N & M. 353 ; 1 H. & W. 428 lfi4 

R. ..,. Sutton (1838), 8 A. & E. 616 ; 3 N. & P. 569 897, 402 

R. V. Swatkins (1831), 4 C. & P. 548 16, 563, 570 

R. V. Sweeney (1841), Ir. C. Rep. 366 215 

R. V. Swendsen (1702), 14 How. St. Tr. 496 : 250 

R. V. Tait (1861), 2 F. & P. 653 332 

R. V. Tancock (1876), 13 Cox, C. C. 217 1129 

R. V. Tanner (1795), 1 Esp. 306 168 

R. v. Tarrant (1833), 6 C. & P. 182 578, 580 

R. V. Taverner (1809), Carr. Supp. 195 ; 4 C. & P. 413, n. (») 246 

R. V. Taylor (1790), Pea. R. 11 904 

R. V. Taylor (1823), 1 C. & P. 84 n 943 

R. ». Taylor 1832), 6 C. & P. 301 824 

R. V. Taylor 1839), 8 0. & P. 734 563, 665 

R. V. Taylor (1868), L. R. 1 C. C. 194 ; 38 L. J. M. C. 106 ; 11 Cox, C. C. 

261 ; 4 F. & F. 611 206 

R. V. Teal (1809), 11 East, 309 ; 13 East, 4 ; 10 R. R. 616 877 

R. V. Tew (1866), Dears. C. C. 429 919 

R. V. Thanet, Earl of (1799), 27 How. St. Tr. 846 612, 899 

R. V. Thistlewood (1820), 33 How. St Tr. 691 267, 291, 310 

R. V. Thoman (1871), 12 Cox, C. C. 54 211 

R. V. Thomas (1794), 2 Lea. C. C. 637 : 576 

R. V. Thomas (1834), 2 Lea. 877 ; 2 East, P. C. 934 239, 564, 571 

R. v. Thomas (1837), 7 0. & P. 817 334 

R. V. Thomas (1870 , 11 Cox, C. C. 535 824, 1020 

R. V. Thomas (1875), 13 Cox, C. C. 52 1126 

R. ». Thompson (1783), 1 Lea. C. C. 291 563, 671 

R. V. Thompson (1826), 1 Moo. C. C. 139 ; 1 Lew. C. C. 194 213 

R. *. Thompson (1845), 6 Q. B. 721 998 

R. V. Thompson 1876), 13 Cox, C. C. 181 382 

R. V. Thompson, (1893 2 Q. B. 12 ; 62 L. J. M. C. 93 ; 69 L. T. 22 ; 41 

W. R. 525 ; 57 J. P. 312 ; 5 R. 392 562, 663, 671, 573 

E. ». Thompson and others (1872), 41 L. J. M. C. 112 ; L. R. 1. C. C. 377 ; 

12 Cox, C. C. 202 888 

R. V. Thompson and Simpson (1863), 3 F. & F. 824 889 

R. ». Thornton (1824), 1 Moo. C. C. 27 568, 669, 671 

R. ■!). Thring (1832), 5 C. & P. 507 1034 

R. f. Thurseross (1834), 1 A. & E. 126 1169 

R. V. Thurtell (1822), Alison, Prac. 584 ; Joy on Conf . 84 685 

R. ». Tinckler(1781), 1 East, P. C. 354 467, 468 

R. V. Tippet (1823), R. & E. 509 569 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



Clxx TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOE 

R. V. ToaHey (1866), 10 Cox, C. C. 406 275 

E. «. Tolaon (1864), 4 P. & P. 73 , 1071 

E. i;. Tomlinson (1834), 6 0. & P. 370 " 213 

R. V. Tooke (1794), 25 How. St. Tr. 446 1033 

E. V. Toole (1857), Dears. & B. 194 ; 7 Cox, C. C. 266 ; 26 L. J. M. C. 79 ; 

3 Jur. N. S. 420 216, 572 

E. «). Torpey (1871), 12Cox, 0. 0. 45 165 

E. V. Totness (1849), 11 Q. B. 80 ; 18 L. J. M. C. 46 132 

E. V. Tower (1815), 4 11. & Sel. 162; 16 E. R. 428 993, 994 

E. V. Towey (1860), 8 Cox, C. C. 328 627 

E. V. Townsend (1841), C. & Marsh. 178 148 

E. V. Treble (1810), 2 Taun. 329 1194 

E. 0. Trehame (1831), 1 Moo. C. C. 298 210 

E. V. Trenwyth (1841), Ir. C. E. 172 148 

E. ». TrevelH (1882), 15 Cox, C. C. 289 274 

E. V. Trowbridge (1827), 7 B. & C. 252 521 

E. V. Trueman (1839), 8 C. & P. 727 238 

E. V. Tubby (1833), 5 C. & P. 530 683 

E. V Tuberfield (1864), 34 L. J. M. 0. 20 ; L. & C. 495 ; 10 Cox, 

C.C.I ; : 250 

E. V. Tuffs (1848) 1 Den. C. C. 324 604 

R. i>. Turner (1664), 6 How. St. Tr. 613 249, 250, 252 

E. V. Turner (1816), 5 M. & Sel. 206 266, 267 

R. V. Turner (1830), 1 Lew. 0. C. 177 213 

R. V. Turner (1832), 1 Moo. P. C. 347 ; 1 Lew. C. C. 119 528, 686, 1102, 

1116 

E. V. Turner (1848), 2 C. & K. 732 1014 

E. V. Turwestou (1830, should be 1850), 16 Q. B. 109 ; 4 Cox, C. C. 349 • 

20 L. J. M. C. 46 ; 15 Jur. 650 203 

E. ■!). Tutohin (1704), 14 How. St. Tr. 1128 45 

E. «;. Twyning (1819), 2 B. & A. 386 106 

E. V. Tyler (1823), 1 C. & P. 129 566 

R. V. Tylney (1849), 18 L. J. M. C. 37 ; 1 Den. C. C. 319 6"4 

R. j;. Tymms (1870), 11 Cox, C. C. 645 198 

E. V. Udall (1590), 1 How. St. Tr. 1289 45 

R. V. TJezzell {see R. v. Eaton) . 

E. ». trimer (1850), 4 Cox, C. C. 442 336 

E. V. Unkles (1873), I. E. 8 C. L. 60 659 

E. ». Upoh'urch (1836), 1 Moo. 0. C. 465 663 571 

E. D. Upper Boddingtou (1826), 8 D. & R. 726 321, 597! 699 

E. V. TJpton Gray (1830), 10 B. & C. 812 127 130 

R. V. Upton-on-Sevem (1833), 6 C. & P. 133 202' 209 

R. V. Van ButoheU (1825, should be 1829), 3 C. & P. 631 ..'. 467^ 468 

R. V. Vandercomb (1796), 2 East, P. C. 614 ; 2 Lea. 708 . . .205, 236, 985, 1126 

R. V. Vane (1662), 6 How. St. Tr. 123 ; 1 East, P. C. 125 626 

E. «j. Varlo (1775), 1 Cowp. 248 ' 791 

E. V. Vaughan (1696), 13 How. St. Tr. 535 ' 624 626 917 

E. V. Verelst (1813), 3 Camp. 432 ; 14 E. R. 775 ' 147 

R. «i. Vernon (1872), 12 Cox, C. C. 153 603 

E. V. Vickery (1848), 12 Q. B. 478 ; 3 New Sess. Cas. 193 ; 17 L. J.'m 'c 

129 ; 12 Jur. 681 833 

R. !>. Vidil (1861), 9 Cox, C. C. 4 ■.'.■.■.■.' .'332, 333 

R. f. Vincent (1771-2), 1 Str. 481 HOa 1107 

R. D. Vincent (1839), 9 C. & P. 91 ■"■■ '943 

E. V. Vincent (1840), 9 C. & P. 276 373 

E. V. Vincent (1852), 2 Den. C. C. 464 ; 6 Cox, 0. C. 537 ; 3 C & K ' 246 • 

21 L. J. M. C. 109 ; 16 Jur. 457 ' 193 

E. v. Virrier (1840), 12 A. & B. 324 627 

E. «. Voke (1823), R. & E. 531 248 

E. ». Wade (1825), 1 Moo. G. 0. 86 897 ggg 

E. V. "Waiawright (1876), 13 Cox, C. 0. 171 '378 

E. V. Waite, (1892) 2 Q. B. 600 ; 61 L. J. M. C. 187 ; 67 L. T 308 "■ 
41 W. R. 80 ' 100 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clxxi 

PAOH 

R. V. Waltefield (1804), 5 East, 335 ; 1 Smitli, 512 6-21 

R. V. "Wakefield (1827), 2 Lew. C. C. 279 890, 893 

R. V. Walker (18U6), cited 6 C. & P. 162 583 

R. V. "Walker (1811), 3 Camp. 264 216 

R. ». "Walker (1839), 2 M. & Rob. 212 375 

R. V. Walker (1843), 2 M. & Rob. 357 1100, 1131 

R. V. Walker (1859), 1 F. & P. 634 332 

R. V. Walkley(1833), 6 0. & P. 175 662, 664 

R. V. Wall (1830), 3 Rubs. C. & M. 625, 834 329, 340 

R. V. Wallace (1853), 3 Ir. 0. L. R. 38 109, 111 

R. o. Wallace (1866), 17 Ir. 0. L. R. 206 15 

R. «/. Walsh (1843), Ir. Cir. R. 866 566, 571 

R. V. Walsh (1850), 5 Cox, 0. 0. 115 335 

R. f. Walter (1836), 3 Esp. 21 ; 6 R. R. 808 ; Preface vi 678 

R. V. Ward (1834), 6 C. & P. 366 1032 

R. V. Ward (1836 , 4 A. & E. 384 47 

R. V. Ward (1864), 10 Cox, 0. 0. 42 238 

R. c. Wardle (1800), R. & R. 9 ' 202 

R. V. Wardroper (1860), 1 BeU, C. 0. 249 ; 8 Cox, C. 0. 284 : 29 L. J. 

M. 0. 116 165 

R. V. Warickshall (1783), 1 Lea. C. 0. 263 685 

R. V. Warman (1846), 1 Den. 183 ; 2 Oar. & K. 196 213 

E. V. Warner (1832), cited 3 Russ. C. & M. 452, 498 668 

R. V. Warringham (1851), 2 Den. C. C. 447 662, 563 

R V. Warwickshire (1837), 6 A. & B. 873 ; 2 N. & P. 153 727 

R. v. Washbrook (1826), 4 B. & C. 732 1133 

R.». Waters (1832), 7 0. & P. 250; 1 Moo. 0. 0. 467 213,216 

R. ». Waters (1848), 1 Den. 356 ; 2 0. & K. 868 ; 18 L. J. M. 0. 53 . . . .84, 215 

R. V. Watkins (1831), cited 4 0. & P. 660, n. (4) 680 

R. V. Watkinson (1739-40), 2 Str. 1122 610 

R. V. Watson (1788), 2 T. R. 201 ; 1 R. R. 461 310 

R. V. Watson (1808), 1 Camp. 215 154 

R. V. Watson (1817), 2 Stark. R. 139 ; 32 How. St. Tr. 82 121, 248, 296, 

382, 384, 385, 626, 613, 616, 626, 895, 896, 909, 921, 947, 948, 

970, 972 

R. V. Watson (1834), 6 C. & P. 653 959, 977 

R. V. Watson (1851), 3 C. & Kir. Ill 680 

R. V. Watts (1864), 3 New R. 177 ; 33 L. J. M. 0. 63 ; L. & Care, 339 ; 

9 Cox, 0. 0. 396 ; 9 L. T. 453 ; 12 W. R. 112 335 

R. v. Waverton (1851), 17 Q. B. 662 ; 2 Den. 0. C. 340 ; 21 L. J. M. 0. 

7 ; 16 Jur. 6 209 

R. V. Wavertree (1841), 2 M. & Rob. 253 399 

R. V. Weaver (1873), 43 L. J. M. C. 13 ; L. R. 2 0. 0. 85 ; 12 Cox, 0. 0. 

627 1053, 1066 

R. V. Webb (1819), 3 Russ. 0. & M. 622 918 

R. V. Webb (1831), 4 C. & P. 564 582, 889 

R. ». Webb (1867), 11 Cox, 0. C. 133 877 

R. V. Webster (1861), L. & 0. 77 ; 31 L. J. M. C. 17 199 

R. V. Wedderbum (1746), Post. 0. L. 22 ; 18 How. St. Tr. 425 625 

R. V. Weeks (1861), 8 Cox, 0. C. 455 ; L. & C. 18; 30 L. J. M. 0. 141 ; 

7 Jur. N. S. 472 ; 4 L. T. 373 ; 9 W. R. 553 246 

R. V. Welbom (1792), 1 East, P. C. 3.58 468 

R. V. Welch (1846), 2 0. & K. 296 ; 1 Den. 0. C. 199 291 

R. V. Welland (1822), R. & R. 494 215 

R. V. Weller (1846), 2 C. & K. 223 334, 579 

R. V. Wellings (1878), 3 Q. B. D. 426 ; 47 L. J. M. 0. 100 ; 38 L. T. 652 ; 

26 W. R. 692 332 

R. V. Wells (1829), M. & M. 326 634 

R. „•. Welton (1862), 9 Cox, C. 0. 297 198, 216, 336 

R. «,. Wenham (1866), 10 Cox, 0. C. 222 1079 

R. V. West, Dr. (undated), cited 2 Wils. 240 ; 5 Mod. 395 996 

R. V. Westbury (1844), 5 Q B. 500 ; 1 New Sess. Cas. 33 ; D. & M. 

606 727 

Vol, I. ends with page 63S. 



clxxii TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOB 

E. V. Western (1868), 37 L. J. M. C. 81 ; L. E. 1 0. C. 122; 11 (3ox, C. 0. 

93 ; 18 L. T. 299 ; 16 W. R. 730 198 

E.. V. Westley (1859), BeU, 0. C. 193; 29L. J. M. C. 35 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 1362. . 198 

E. V. Wheater (1838), 2 Moo. C. C. 45 ; 2 Lew. C. C. 157 583, 684 

E. V. Wheatland (1838), 8 C. & P. 238 629 

E. V. Wheeley (1838), 8 C. & P. 260 283, 580 

E. i;. Wheeling (1789), 1 Lea. C. C. 311, n 560 

E. V. Wheelook (1826), 6 B. & C. 511 788, 1139 

E. II. Whelan (1881), 8 L. E. Ir. 314 ; 14 Cox, C. C. 595 954 

E. V. Whiston (1836), 4 A. & E. 607 ; 6 N. & M. 65 131 

E. «!. Whitbread (1823), 1 0. & P. 84, n 943 

E. V. Whitoliarch (1827), 7 B. & 0. 673 130 

E. 11. White (1786), 3 Bac. Ab. 202, n. ; 1 Lea. C. C. 430, n. (a) . . 896, 898, 901, 904 

E. V. White (1823), E. & E. 508 500 

E. V. White 1843), 4 Q. B. Ill, 112 91 

E. 1). White (-1865), 4 F. & F. 383 104 

E. V. Whitehead (1866), 35 L. J. M. C. 186 ; L. E. 1 C. 0. 33 ; 10 Cox, 

C. C. 34 ; 14 L. T. 489 ; 14 W. E. 677 910 

E. V. Whitehouse (undated), cited 3 Euss. C. & M. 625 893 

E. V. Whitley Lower (1813), 1 M. & S. 636 '. 494, 496 

E. V. Whitworth (1858), 1 F. & F. 382 468, 469 

E. V. Wick St. Lawrence (1833), 5 B. & Ad. 526 . . 788, 1103, 1139, 1140, 1141 

E. V. Wiokham (1835), 3 A. & B. 517 755 

E. V. Wiokham (1839), 10 A. & E. 34 ; 2 P. & D. 333 204 

E. V. Widdop (1872), 42 L. J. M. C. 9 ; L. E. 2 C. C. 3 ; 12 Cox, C. C. 

261 ; 27 L. T. 693 ; 21 W. E. 176 583 

E. V. Wideoombe in the Moor (1847), 2 New Seas. Gas. 639 ; 9 Q. B. 894 ; 

16 L. J. M. C. 44 ; 11 Jur. 227 1139 

E. V. Wigan (1849), 14 Q. B. 287 ; 3 New Sess. Cas. 670 ; 19 L. J. M. 0. 

18 ; 13 Jur. 1052 621 

E. V. Wigley (1835), 2 Lew. C. C. 258, 259, n 627 

E. ». wad (1836), IMoo. C. 0.462 667,569 

E. V. Wilde (1669), 1 Lev. 396 ; 1 Doug. 97, n. 41 18 

E. V. Wilkes (1836), 7 0. & P. 273 633, 634 

E. V. Wilkinson (1838), 8 C. & P. 662 284, 679 

E. V. Willans (should be Williams) (1835), 7 0. & P. 320 898 

E. J). Williams (1710), 10 Mod. 63 ; 4 Bl. Com. 29 165 

E. V. Williams (1811), 2 Camp. 646 ; 11 E. E. 781 203 

E. V. Williams (182.5), 1 Moody, C. C. 107 204 

E. V. WiDiams (1834), 6 C. & P. 626 239 

E. v. Williams (1836), 7 0. & P. 298 ." " 216 

E. V. WUliams (1838), 8 C. & P. 284, 434 889, 932 

E. 1-. Williams (i860), 2 Den. 61 202 

E. „. WiUiams (1853), 6 Cox, C. C. 343 '.'.'.'.'. " 995 

E. V. Williams 1862), 3 New E. 338, per Ir. CO.; 9 Cox, 0. C. 338. . . . 211 

E. V. Williams (1865), 4 F. & F. 515 . : 336 

E. V. WiUiams (1871), 11 Cox, 0. C. 684; 12 Cox, 0. C. 101 '.'.'.'."l2l','326, 337 
E. •^. Williams, (1893) 1 Q. B. 320 ; 62 L. J. M. 0. 69 ; 41 W. E. 332 100 

E. V. WiUis (1710), 16 How. St. Tr. 624 558 559 

E. «-. Willis (1845), 1 Den. C. 0. 80 ; 1 0. & K. 722 '215 

E. V. WiUshiie (1881), 6 Q. B. D. 366 ; 50 L. J. M. 0. 57 ; 14 Cox, 0. 6 

641 ; 44 L. T. 222 ; 29 W. E. 473 ; 45 J. P. 375 106 

E. ■!/. Wilmett (1848), 3 Cox, C. 0. 281 ] '. . . 264 

E. v. Wilshaw (1841), 0. & Marsh. ] 45 329, 336, 339, 577 

E. K. Wilson (1817), Holt, N. P. E. 597 669 

E. V. Wilson (1861), 8 Cox, C. 0. 453 ' ' " ' 332 

E. K. Wilson (1874), 12 Cox, C. C. 622 '322 836 

E. D. Wilton (1858), 1 F. & F. 309 '332 

E. i>. Wilts. & Berks. Can. Co. (1836), 3 A. & E. 47 992 998 

E. I). Windsor (1864), 4 F. & F. 366 ' 663 

E V. Wink (1834), 6 0. & P. 397 367 

E. V. Winkworth (1830), 4 C. & P. 444 248 375 

E. V. Winslow (1860), 8 Cox, 0. 0. 397 .' " "237', 247 

T!ie references are to paries, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clxxiii 

PAOH 

R. V. "Wifters (1811), cited E. v. Holt, 5 T. R. 446 20, 598 

H.v. Witney (1836), 5 A. & E. 191 ; 6 N. & M. 562 131 

R. V. Woburn (1808), 10 Bast, 395 494 

R. V. Womersly (1836), 2 Lew. C. C. 162 826 

R. V. Wood (1832), 1 Dowl. 509 816 

E. V. Wood (1841), Jebb & B. vii. ; 7 M. & W. 573 ; 9 Dowl. 310 ; 10 L. J. 

Ex. 168 342, 906 

R. V. Wood (1842), Ir. Cir. R. 597 572 

R. V. Wood (I860), 5 Jur. 225 2.'50 

R. V. Wood (1877) 14 Cox, C. 0. 46 375 

R. V. Woodohe8ter(1742-3), Burr. S. C. 191 ; 2 Str. 1172 1106 

R. V. Woodcock (1787), 1 Leach, 504 25, 333, 464, 467, 468, 470 

R. V. Woodfall (1770), 5 Burr. 2661 ; 20 How. St. Tr. 913,918, 920.. 25, 45, 109 

R. 1-. WoodhaU (1872), 12 Cox, C. C. 240 206 

R. V. Woodhead (1847), 2 C. & K. 520 942, 943 

R. V. Woodley (1834), 1 M. & Rob. 390 322 

R. V. Woods (1840), 1 Crawf . & D. C. C. 439 974 

R. V. Woodward (1831), 1 Moody, C. C. 323 16, 209 

R. V. Wooldale (1844), 6 Q. B. 549 ; 1 New Seas. Cas. 377 ; 14 L. J. M. C. 

13; 9 Jur. 83 543, 784, 795 

R. •:,. Woolford (1834), 1 M. & Rob. 384 1127 

R. „. Worcester (1838), 5 Q. B. 608, u 727 

R. V. Worcestershire JJ. (1854), 3 E. & B. 477 ; 2 C. L. R. 1333 ; 23 L. J. 

M. C. 113 ; 18 Jur. 424 1137 

R. „. Worfield (1794), 5 T. R. 608 153 

R. .-. Worth (1843), 4 Q. B. 132 ; 12 L. J. M. C. 47 ; 3 G-. & D. 376 . .436, 437, 

458 
R. D. Wrangle (1835), 2 A. & E. 514 ; 4 N. & M. 375 ; 1 H. & W. 41 . . . . ■za\) 

E. V. Wright (1821), E. & R. 456 931, 934, 935 

R. 1). Wright (I860), 2 P. & F. 320 199 

R. V. Wyoherley (1838), 8 C. & P. 262 359 

R. V. Wye (1838), 7 A. & E. 770 ; 3 N. & P. 6 1106 

R. 0. Wylde (1834), 6 0. & P. 380 357, 918 

R V. Wylie (1804), 1 Bos. & P. N. R. 94 ; 2 Lea. C. C. 983 237, 246 

R. 1). Yarwell (1829), 9 B. & C. 894 ; 4 M. & Ry. 685 521 

E. V. Yates (1841), 0. & Mar. 139 624 

E. V. Yeadon (1861), L. & Cave, 81 ; 9 Cox, C. C. 91 ; 31 L. J. M. C. 70 ; 

7 Jur. N. S. 1128 ; 6 L. T. 329 ; 10 W. R. 64 206 

R. V. Yeoveley (1838), 8 A. & E. 818 ; 1 P. & D. 60 788, 1032, 1140 

R. V. Yewin (1811), 2 Camp. 639 947, 950, 951 

R. V. Yore (1839), 1 Jebb & Sy. 463 893 

E. ■„. York, Mayor of (1792), 6 T. E. 66 1114 

E. V. Young (1850), 3 C. & E. 106 336, 578 

E. V. Young (1866), 10 Cox, C. C. 371 633 

Eabey v. Gilbert (1861), 30 L. J. Ex. 170 ; 6 H. & N. 636 ; 3 L. T. 752 ; 

9 W. E. 386 521 

Rackham i: Marriott (1857), 1 H. & N. 234 ; 2 H. & N. 196 ; 26 L. J. 

Ex. 315 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 495 712 

Radeliffe v. Fursman (1730), 2 Bro. P. C. 614 601 

Radcliffe v. Tin. Ins. Co. (1810), 7 Johns. 38 1093 

Radford®. M-Intosh (1790), 3 T. R. 632 150, 519 

Radford v. Wilson (1754), 3 Atk. 815 180 

Rae, In Goods of (1892), 27 L. R. Ir. 116 702 

Rao-gett V. Musgrave (1827), 2 C. & P. 556 ( 526 

Raikes «. Todd (1838), 8 A. & E. 855 ; 1 P. & D. 138 ; 8 L. J. Q. B. 35. . 669 

Rainforth, Re (1880), 49 L. J. Ch. 5 716 

Rainsford v. Smith (l563). Dyer, 196a 94 

Rajah, The (1872), L. E. 3 Ad. & Ecc. 639 ; 41 L. J. Adm. 97 ; 27 L. T. 

102 ; 21 W. E. 14 178 

Eajah of Coorg ®. E. India Co. (1856), 29 Beav. 300 ; 30 L. J. Ch. 226 . . 618 

Eamadge v. Eyan (18321, 9 Bing. 333 ; 2 Moo. & Sc. 421 933 

Eambertr. Cohen (1803), 4 Esp. 213; 6 E. E. 854 '. 293, 926 

Rambler v. Tryson (1821), 7 Serg. & E. 90 931 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



clxxiv TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAGE 

Ramchum Mulliok v. Luckmeechund Radakiasen (1854), 9 Moo. P. C. 0. 4G. .38 

Ramsbotham v. Senior (1869), L. R. 8 Eq. 676 ; 17 W. R- 1057 610 

Ramabottom v. Buokhurst (1814), 2 Maule & S. 567 ; 15 R. R. 362 84 

Ramsbottom v. Mortley (1814), 2 M. & Sel. 445 ; 15 R. R 304 286, 289 

Ramabottom v. Tunbridge (1814), 2 M. & Sel. 434 ; 15 R. R. 302 .... 286, 289 
Ramaden v. Dyaon (1865), L. R. 1 H. L. 129; 12 Jur. N. S. 506 ; 14 

W. R. 926 538, 542 

Ramuz v. Crowe (1847), 1 Ex. 167 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 280 ; 11 Jur. 715. . . .307, 308 

Rancliflfe v. Parkyns (1818), 6 Dow. 202 433 

Randall v. Guruey (1819), 3 B. & Aid. 252 ; 1 Chitty, 679 868, 869, 870 

Randall v. Lith^ow (1884), 12 Q. B. D. 525 ; 53 L. J. Q. B. 518 ; 60 L. T. 

587 ; 32 W. R. 794 1116 

Randall v. Lyncli (1810), 2 Camp. 357 ; 11 R. R. 727 1212 

Randall v. Morgan (1805), 12 Ves. 67 ; 8 K. R. 289 665, 680 

RandaU v. Newson (1877), 46 L. J. Q. B. 259 ; 2 Q. B. D. 102 ; 36 L. T. 

164 ; 25 W. R. 313 777 

Randall's case (1820), 6 City Hall Reo. 141 891 

Randell v. Trimen (1856), 18 C. B. 786 ; 25 L. J. C. P. 307 780 

Randle v. Blackburn (1813), 5 Taun. 245 479 

Randolph v. Gordon (1815), 5 Price, 312 ; 19 R. R. 633 430 

Rands v. Thomas (1816), 6 M. & Sel. 244 877 

Ranee Khnjooroonissa v. Mussamat Roushun Jehan (1876), L. R. 3 Ind. 

App. 291, 311 149 

Raugeloy v. Webster (1840), 1 1 New Hamps. 299 1148 

Ranken v. M'Murphy (1889), 24 L. R. Ir. 290 542 

Rankin ». Homer (1812), 16 East, 193 518 

Rankin v. Tenbrook (1837), 6 "Watts, 388 443 

Rann ». Hughes (between 1764—1797), 7 T. R. 350., n 653 

Ransley, Ex parte (1823), 3 D. & R. 672 120 

Raper v. Birkbeck (1812), 15 East, 17 ; 13 R. R, 354 l200 

Raphael v. Bk. of England (1855), 17 C. B. 161 ; 25 L. J. C. P. 33 617 

Rapp V. Latham (1819), 2 B. & A. 795 488 

Rashdall v. Ford (1866), L. R. 2 Eq. 750 ; 35 L. J. Ch. 769 ; 14 L. T. 790 ; 

14 W. R. 950 780 

RatoUff «). RatolifE and Anderson (1859), 1 S. & T. 467; 29 L. J. Mat. 

171 1060, 1054 

Ravee «). Farmer (1791), 4 T. R. 146 : 2 R. R. 347 1124 

Ravenga v. Mackintosh (1824), 2 B. & C. 693 ; 1 C. & P. 204 ; 4 Dowl. & 

R. 107 372 

Ravenscroft v. Jones (1864), 33 L. J. Ch. 482 ; 32 BeaT. 669 806 

Rawley v. Rawley (1876), 1 Q. B. D. 460 ; 45 L. J. Q. B. 675 ; 35 L. T. 

191 ; 24 W. R. 995 718 

Rawlins v. Desborough (1840), 2 M. & Rob. 328 ; 8 C. & P. 321 . .48, 259, 271 

Rawlins v. Rickards (1860), 28 Beav. 370 455, 708 

Rawlins v. Turner (1699), 1 Ld. Raym. 736 655 

Rawlins v. West Derby (1846), 2 C. B. 72 ; 1 Lutw. 373 ; 15 L. J. 0. P. 70.. 726 

Rawlinsou». Clarke (1845), 14M. &W. 187; 14 L. J. Ex. 364 750 

Rawlinson v. Oriel (1688), 1 Show. 75 ; Carth. 96 1116 

Raworth i). Marriott (1833), 1 My. & K. 643 140 

Rawson v. Haigh (1824), 2 Bing. 104 376 377, 381 

Rawson v. "Walker (1816), 1 Stark. 361 757 

Rawstome v. Gandell (1846), 15 M. & "W. 304 ; 4 Railw. Cas. 295 ; 3 

Cowl. &L. 682; 15 L.J. Ex. 291; 10 Jur. 294 492 

Ray V. Jones (1836), 2 Gale, 220 458 

Raymond, Ex parte (1874), L R. 8 Eq. 231 128 

Rayner v. AUhusen (1851), 2 L. M. & P. 606 ; 21 L. J. Q. B. 68 ; 15 Jur. 

1060 1185 

Read v. Anderson (1884), 10 Q. B. D. 100 ; 62 L. J. Q. B. 214 ; 48 L. T 

74 ; 31 "W. R, 453 620 

Read v. Bishop of Lincoln, (1892) A. C. 644 ; 62 L. J. P. CI ; 67 L T 

128 ; 56 J. P. 725 16, 1179 

Read v. Coker (1863), 13 C. B. 850 ; 22 L. J. 0. P. 201 ; 17 Jur. 990 .. . 227 
Read v. Dunsmore (1840), 9 C. & P. 588 ISo 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clxxv 

PAGE 

Read 17. Gamble (1839), 10 A. & E. 597, n 289, 318 

Read v. Nash (1761), 1 "Wils. 305 677 

Read*. Passer (1794), 1 Esp. 214 373, 1U47 

Read v. Victoria St. and PimUco Ry. Co. (1863), 1 H. & C. 826 ; 32 L. J. 

Ex. 127 1102 

Reade's case (1604-5), 5 Co. Rep. 33 550 

Reader v. Kingham (1862), 13 C. B. N. S. 344 ; 32 L. J. C. P. 108 ; 9 Jur. 

N. S. 797; 7L. T. 789; 11 W. R. 366 677, 679 

Readhead v. Midi. Ry. Co. (1869), 36 L. J. Q. B. 181 ; L. R. 2 Q. B. 412 ; 

8B.&S.371; 16L.T.48o; 15 W. R. 831 772 

Rearden v. Minter (1843), 5 M. & Gr. 204 ; 12 L. J. C. P. 139 1211 

Reay's estate (1855), 1 Jur. N. S. 222 1208 

Redding v. Wilks (1845), 3 Bro. C. C. 401 679 

Redford v. Birley (1822), 3 Stark. 88 373, 383 

Redington v. Redington (1734), 3 Ridg. P. C. 106 666 

Reeoe v. Rigby (1821), 4 B. & Aid. 202 39 

Reeoe v. Trye (1846), 9 Beav. 316 601 

Reed v. Deere (1827), 7 B. & C. 261 ; 2 C. & P. 624 287 

Reed v. Devaynes (1791), 2 Cox, 285 ; 3 Br. C. C. 95 ; 2 R. R. 48 144 

Reed v. Eenn (1866), 36 L. J. Ch. 464 721 

Reed v. Jackson (1801), 1 East, 365 ; 6 R. R. 283 84, 397, 398, 405, 1109 

Reed v. James (1816), 1 Stark, R. 132 942 

Reedsj. King (1858), 30 L. T. 290 939 

Reed 1!. Lamb (1860), 29 L. J. Ex. 462 ; 6H. &N. 75; 6 Jur. N. S. 828. .1050, 

1230 

Reed v. Passer (1794), Pea. R. 232 ; 3 R. R. 696 295 

Reed v. Woodward (l877), 11 Phila. (Pa.) 64, 641 693 

Rees, Re (1865), 34 L. J. P. & M. 56 697 

Reesi). Bowen(1826),M'Cl. & T. 383 H57 

Reest). Lloyd (1811), Wightw. 1811 119 

Rees V. Overbaugh (1827), 6 Cowen, 746 1199 

Rees V. Rees (1873), L. R. 3 P. & D. 84 : 29 L. T. 375 141 

Rees V. Smith (1816), 2 Stark. R. 30 272 

Rees V. Walters (1838), 3 M. & W. 527 ; 2 Jur. 378 ; 7 L. J. Ex. 138. .. . 431, 

1116 

Rees V. Williams (1847), 1 De G. & Sm. 314 1209 

Reeside, Schooner, The (1837), 2 Sumn. 567 766, 783 

Reeve's Trusts, Re (1879), 4 Ch. D. 841 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 412 144 

Reeve v. Bird (1831), 1 C. M. & R. 31 : 4 Tyr. 612 ; 3 L. J. Ex. 2S2 660 

Reeve ». Hodson (1863), 10 Hare, App. xix 1037, 1063 

Reeve v. Whitmore (1865), 2 Dr. & Sm. 446 483 

Reeve v. Wood (1868), 34 L. J. M. C. 16 ; 10 Cox, C. C. 68 ; 6 B. & S. 364 894 
Reeves v. Hearne (1836), 1 M. & W. 323 ; 2 Gale, 4 ; 5 L. J. Ex. 156 . . 716 

Reeves v. Lindsay (1869), I. R. 3 Eq. 609 697 

Reeves v. Slater (1827), 7 B. & C. 486 ; 1 M. & R. 265 643 

Reffell V. Reffell (1866), L. R. 1 P. & D. 139 ; 35 L. J. P. & M. 121 .... 766 

Regicides, Trial of the (1660), Eel. J. 12 ; 5 How. St. Tr. 1181 899 

Reid V. Batte (1829), M. & M. 414 281, 286, 287, 746 

Reid V. Langlois (1849), 1 Mac. & G. 627 ; 19 L. J. Ch. 337 ; 2 H. & T. 69.. 599 

Reid V. Margison (1808), 1 Camp. 469 1018 

Reid». Teakle(]853), 13 C. B. 627; 22 L. J. C. P. 161 ; 17 Jur. 841 .... 166 
Reidpath's case (1870), 40 L. J. Ch. 39 ; 11 L. R. Eq. 86 ; 23 L. T. 834 ; 

19 W. R. 219 155 

Reidy v. Pierce (1861), 11 Ir. C. L. R. 374 19 

Reilly v. Fitzgerald (1843), 6 Ir. E. R. 335 409, 1105 

Reimers v. Druoe (1867), 26 L. J. Ch. 196 ; 23 Beav. 146 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 147.. 1147 
Remmett v. Lawrence (1850), 15 Q. B. 1004 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 25 ; 14 Jur. 

1067 549 

Rendles, Re, Rhodes v. Rhodes (see Rhodes, Re, &c.). 

Reneaux ». Teakle (1853), 8 Ex. 680 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 241 ; 17 Jur. 351 .... 166 

Renner v. Bank of Columbia (1824), 9 Wheat. 581 767 

Rennieti. Clarke (1850,, 5Ex. 292; 19 L. J. Ex. 278 541 

Rennie v. Wynn (1849), 4 Ex. 691 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 2 541 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



clxxvi TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAGE 

Kenmson v. Walker (1872), L. R. 7 Ex. 143 ; 41 L. J. Ex. 43 ; 26 L. T. 

167; 20 W. E. 471 187 

Resp. v. Fields (1822-4), Peck, R. 140 555 

Reap. V. MoCartj (1781), 2 Dall. 86 661, 574 

Reuss V. Pick^Iey (1866), L. R. 1 Ex. 342 ; 35 L. J. Ex. 218 ; 4 H. & C. 

588 ; 15 L. T 25 ; 14 W. R. 924 ; 12 Jiir. N. S. 628 675 

Reuter v. Electric Telegr. Co. (1856), 6 E. & B. 346 ; 26 L. J. Q. B. 46 ; 

2 Jur. N. S. 1245 642, 645 

Revell, Ex parte, Tollemache, In re (1884), 13 Q. B. D. 720, 727 ; 64 L. J. 

Q. B. 89, 92 ; 51 L. T. 376, 379 ; 33 W. R. 288, 289 629 

Revell V. Blake (1873), 41 L. J. C. P. 129 ; 42 L. J. C. P. 165 ; L. R. 

8 C. P. 533 ; 29 L. T. 67 ; 22 W. R. 96 1167 

Eevis». Smith (1856), 18 C. B. 126; 29L. J. C. P. 196; 2 Jur. N. S. 614. . 865 

Rew V. Barber (1824), 3 Cowen, 272 775 

Rew V. Hutchins (1861), 10 0. B. N. S. 829 230 

Reynell v. Lewis (1846), 15 M. & W. 617 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 25 540, 641 

Reynell v. Sprye (1846), 10 Beav. 51 ; 16 L. J. Ch. 117 602, 603, 607 

Reyner V. Hall (1813), 4 Tavm. 725 ; 14 R. R. 650 552 

Reyner v. Pearson (1812), 4 Taun. 662 ; 13 R. R. 723 388 

Reynolds, Ex parte (1883), 52 L. J. Ch. 223 ; 21 Ch. D. 601 ; 47L. T. 495; 

31 W. R. 187 849 

Reynolds, Ex parte, Reynolds, Re (1882), 20 Ch.. D. 294 ; 61 L. J. Ch. 

756 ; 46 L. T. 508 ; 30 W. R. 651 ; 46 J. P. 533 964 

Reynolds, Re (1873), L. R. 3 P. & D. 35 ; 42 L. J. P. & M. 20 ; 28 L. T. 

144 ; 21 W. R. 512 709 

Reynolds v. Fenton (1846), 3 C. B. 194 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 16 ; 10 Jur. 668 . . 8, 

1146, 1148 

Reynolds v. Reynolds (1848), 12 Ir. Ch. R. 172, 181 117 

Reynolds v. Staines (1849), 2 C. & K. 745 1219 

Reynoldaon v. Perkins (1769), Amh. 663 497 

Rhodes, Re, Rhodes v. Rhodes (1887), 36 Ch. D. 686 ; 56 L. J. Ch. 825 ; 

57 L. T. 652 172 

Rhodes v. Airdale Drain. Com. (1876), 45 L. J. C. P. 337 ; L. R. 9 C. P. 

608; 31 L. T. 59 1160 

Rhodes v. Rhodes (1889), 7 App. Cas. 112 ; 46 L. T. 463 ; SOW. R. 709. . 741 
Ricardof. Garcias (1846), 12 CI. &Fin.368; 9 Jur. 1019. .1117, 1142, 1143,1152 
Riccardj;. Inclosure Commiss. (1864), 4 E. & B. 329; 3 C. L. R. 119; 

24 L. J. Q. B. 49 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 496 1183 

Rice, In re (1886), 32 Ch.D. 35; 66 L. J. Ch. 799 ; 54L. T. 589 ; 34 W. R. 

747 1208 

Rice, Re (1870), Ir. R. 5 Eq. 176 690 

Rice V. Howard (1886), 16 Q. B. D. 681 ; 65 L. J. Q. B. 311 ; 34 W. R. 532. 939 

Rice V. Rice (1863), 2 Drew. 73 ; 23 L. J. Ch. 289 542 

Rich V. Jackson (1794), 4 Bro. C. C. 619 743, 750, 757 

Richards v. Bassett (1830), 10 B. & C. 633 398, 408 

Richards v. Bluck (1848), 6 Dowl. & L. 325 ; 6 C. B. 437 ; 18 L. J. C. P. 17 . 192 
Richards!). Easto (1846), 15. M. & W. 244; 3 Do-wl. & L. 615 ; 16 L. J. 

Ex. 163 ; 10 Jur. 695 227 

Richards D. Gellatly (1872), L. R. 7 C. P. 127; 26L.T.435; 20 W. R. 630.. 1186 

Richards ■». Gogarty (1870), I. R. 4 C. L. 300 436 

Richards i>. Hough (1882), 51 L. J. Q. B. 361 ; 30 W. R. 676 900, 906 

Richards v. Johnston (1859), 4 H. & N. 660 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 322; 5 Jur. 

N. S. 520 529 

Richards f. Lewis (1852), 11 C. B. 1054; 20 L.J. C. P. 177; 15 Jur. 512.. 303, 

305, 1204 
Richards v. Lond. & S. Coast Ry. Co. (1849), 7 C. B. 839 ; 6 Eailw. Cas. 

49 ; 18 L. J. C. P. 251 ; 13 Jur. 986 201 

Richards v. Porter (1827), 6 B. & C. 437 672 

Richards v. Richards (1731), 16 East, 294, n. (a) ; 13 R. R. 476, n 171 

Richards v. Richards (1844), 2 M. & Rob. 557 246, 255 

Richards D. Rose (1852), 9 Ex. 218; 2 C. L. R.311; 23L. J. Ex. 3 115 

Richardson v. Anderson (1806), 1 Camp. 65, n. (a) ; 10 R. R. 628, n 1011 

Richardson v. Barry (1860), 29 Beav. 22 712 

The refereneoa are to pages, not to parayrapha. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clxxvii 

PAOB 

Richardson v. Dutois (1869), L. K. 6 Q. B. 61 ; 39 L. J. Q. B. 69 ; 21 L. T. 

636 ; 18 W. E. 62 ; 10 B. & S. 830 167 

Richardson ». aifford(1834), 1 A. &E.60; 8 Dowl. & R. 643 ; 2Sm.L.C.112. 654 

Richardson v. Melliah (1824), 2 Bing. 241 1048, 1049, 1050 

Richardson V. Newoomb (1838), 21 Pick. 315 1223 

Richardson v. Watson (1833), 4 B. & Ad. 787 ; 1 N. & M. 567 ; 2 L. J. 

K. B. 134 740, 789 

Richardson «. Williamson (1871), L. R. 6 Q. B. 276 ; 40 L. J. Q. B. 145 . 780 
Richardson v. Willis (1872), 42 L. R. Ex. 15 ; 12 Cox, C. C. 298 ; 27 L. T. 

828 ; L. R. 8 Ex. 69 190, 1071 

Richardson v. Tounge (1871), L. R. 10 Eq. 276 ; L. R. 6 Ch. 478 ; 39 L. J. 

Ch. 475 ; 40 L. J. Ch. 338 ; 25 L. T. 230 ; 19 W. R. 612 491 

Riches and Marshall's Trust Deed, Re (1864), 4 De G. J. & S. 581 ; 11 

L. T. 651 ; 34L. J. Bank. 10; 13 W. R. 353 160 

Richey v. Garvey (1847), 10 Ir. L. R. 644 298 

Richmond v. Smith (1830), 8 B. & C. 9 ; 2 M. & R. 236 162 

Rickards v. Murdock (1830), 10 B. & C. 627 934 

Rioketts v. Bennett (1847), 4 C. B. 686 ; 17 D. J. C. P. 17 ; 11 Jur. 1062. . 160 

Rinketts v. Gurney (1819), 7 Price, 699 866, 868 

Ricketts V. Turquand (1848), 1 H. L. Caa. 472 784 

Riokford v. Ridge (1810), 2 Camp. 539 32 

Rickman v. Carstairs (1833), 5 B. & Ad. 662 789 

Rideont's Trusts, Re (1870), L. R. 10 Eq 41 ; 39 L. J. Ch. 192 621 

Rider v. Wood (1855), 24 L. J. Ch 737 ; 1 K. & J. 644 6 

Ridgeway v. Darwin (1802), 7 Ves. 404 ; 8 Ves. 66 ; 6 R. R. 227 482 

Ridgway v. Ewbank (1839), 2 M. & Rob. 218 258, 259 

Ridgway v. Wharton (1856-7), 3 De G. M. & G. 677 ; 6 H. L. Cas. 238 ; 

24 L. J. Ch. 46 672, 673 

Ridler, Re, Ridler ». Ridler (1882), 22 Ch. D. 74 ; 52 L. J. Ch. 343 135 

Ridley f. Gyde (1832), 9 Bing. 349 ; 2 Moo. & Sc. 448 ; 2 L. J. C. P. 25. .376, 380 
Ridley v. Ridley (1865), 34 L. J. Ch. 462 ; 34 Beav. 478 ; 12 L. T. 481 ; 

13W. R. 763; llJur. N. S. 475 682 

Rigden v. Vallier (1751), 2 Ves. sen. 252 ; 3 Atk. 731 139 

Rigg V. Curgenven (1769), 2 Wils. 399 549, 550, 554 

Rigge V. Burbidge (1846), 15 M. & W. 598 ; 15 L. J. Ex. 309 ; 4 Dowl. & 

L. 1 532, 1122 

Right, on d. of Flower, ». Darby (17S6), 1 T. R. 162 ; 1 R. R. 169 35 

Right Ji. Price (1779), 1 Doug. 241 696 

Riley v. Gerrish (1851), 9 Gush. 1 n4 , 753^ 1205 

Riley v. Home (1828), 5 Bing. 217 ; 2 M. & P. 331 771 

Ripley, Re (1858), 1 S. & T. 68 747 

Ripley v. Warren (1824), 2 Pick. 592 20 

Riponcase (1833), Cock. & R. 301 ; Per. & K. 211 496, 497 

Ripon V. Davies (1833), 2 N. & M. 310 607 

Eippon*. Priest (1863), 3 F. & F. 644 < 1163 

Rishton «. Nesbitt (1844), 2 M. & Rob. 554 421 

Rishton v. Nisbett (1834), 1 M. & Rob. 347 866, 869 

Rishton v. Whatmore (1878), 8 Ch. D. 467 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 629 ; 26 W. R. 

827 673, 730 

Rising V. Dolphin (1840), 8 Dowl. 309 732 

Risl V. Faux (1863), 4 B. & S. 409; 32 L. J. Q. B. 386 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 202 ; 

8L. T. 737; 11 W. R. 918 263 

Ritchie v. Van Gelder (1854), 9 Ex. 762 ; 18 Jur. 385 193 

River Steam Co., Re (Mitchell's Claim) (1871), L. R. 6 Ch. 822 ; 25 L. T. 

319; 19 W. R. 1130 710 

Roach V. Garran (1748), 1 Ves. sen. 159 1160 

Robarts v. Tucker (1851), 16 Q. B. 560 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 270 647 

Robb V. Connor (1874), Jr. 9 Eq. 373 ...,..., 818 

Robb V. Starkey (1845), 2 C. & K. 143 , 310 

Roberts, Ex parte (1850), 2 Mao. & G. 192 ; 2 H. & T. 391 ; 19 L. J. Oh. 

368 ; 3 De G. & Sm. 205 , , . 640 

Roberts, Re, Ex p. Brook (1879), 10 Ch, D. 100 ; 48 L. J. Bank. 22 ; 

39 L. T. 458 ; 27 W. R. 255 662 

Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



clxxviii TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOE 

Roberts v. AUatt (1828), M. & M. 192 966, 967 

Roberta v. Bethell (18o2), 12 G. B. 778 ; 22 L. J. C. P. 69 ; 16 Jur. 1087 . . 147 

Roberta v. Bradshaw (1815), 1 Stark. 28 317 

Roberts v. Doxon (1791), Pea. R. 83 ; 3 R. E. 660 323 

Roberts ». Eddington (1801), 4 Esp. 88 , 1178 

Roberts v. Fortune (1742), Harg. Law Tracts, 468, n 1103 

Roberts v. Humphreys (1882), L. R. 8 Q. B. 483 ; 42 L. J. M. C. 147 ; 

29 L. T. 387 ; 21 W. R. 885 266 

Roberts v. Justice (1843), 1 0. & K. 93 613 

Roberts v. Ogilby (1821), 9 Price, 269 645 

Roberts v. Orchard (1863), 2 H. & C. 769 ; 33 L. J. Ex. 65 ; 9 L. T. 727 ; 

12 W. R. 253 226 

Roberts v. Phillips (1856), 4 E. & B. 450 ; 3 C. L. R. 513 ; 24 L. J. Q. B. 

171; iJur. N. S. 444 700 

Roberts v. Boberts (1862), 2 S. & T. 337 ; 31 L. J. P. M. & A. 46 ; 5 L. T. 

689 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 220 709 

Roberts v. SneU (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 577 194 

Roberts v. Tucker (1849), 3 Ex. 632 681 

Roberts' case (1827), 1 Dev. 269 666 

Robertson v. French (1803), 4 East, 130 ; 4 Esp. 246 ; 7 R. R. 635.. 116, 740, 741 
Robertson v. Jackson (1845), 2 C. B. 412 ; 16 L. J. 0. P. 28 ; 10 Jur. 98. . 763, 

764, 782 
Robertson v. Powell (1864), 2 H. & 0. 762 ; 33 L. J. Ex. 34; 10 Jur. N. S. 

442 ; 12 "W. R. 623 704 

Robertson ». Strath (1843), 6 Q. B. 942; Dav. &M. 773; 8 Jur. 404. .83, 1143, 

1154 
Robins V. Bridge (1837), 3 M. & W. 114 ; 6 Dowl. 140 ; M. & H. 357 . . . . 820 
Robins v. Dolphin (1858), 29 L. J. P. & M. 11, 138 ; 7 H. L. Cas. 390 ; 

SMacq. 563; 1 S. &T. 518; 8 W. R. 177 1144 

Robinson v. Anderson (1865), 20 Beay. 98 ; 7 De a. M. & G. 239 160 

Robinson i). Brown (1845), 3 C. B. 754 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 46 316, 317 

Robinson n. ColKngwood (1866), 17 0. B N. S. 777 ; 34 L. J. 0. P. 18 ; 

10 Jur. N. S. 1080; 11 L. T. 313; 13 W. R. 84 148 

Robinson v. Curry (1881), 7 Q. B. D. 466 ; 50 L. J. Q. B. 661 ; 45 L. T. 

368; 30 W. R. 39; 46 J. P. 148 76 

Robinson v. Davies (1879), 5 Q. B. D. 26; 49 L. J. Q. B. 218 ; 28 W. R. 255 . 347 
Robinson v. Davison (1871), L. R. 6 Ex. 269 ; 40 L. J. Ex. 172 ; 24 L. T. 

755 ; 19 W. R. 1036 780 

Robinson v. Harman (1848), 1 Ex. 850 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 202 773 

Robinson v. Hawksford (1846), 9 Q. B. 52; 15 L. J. Q. B. 377; 10 Jur. 964.. 32 
Robinson v. Kitohin (1856), 21 Beav. 365 ; 8 De G. M. & G. 88 ; 25 L. J. 

Ch. 441 641 

Robinson v. Local Board of Barton (1882), 8 App. Cas. 798 ; 53 L. J. Ch. 

226 ; 50 L. T. 57 ; 32 W. R. 249 47, 48 

Robinson t-. Markis (1841), 2 M. & Rob. 375 329, 349 

Robinson ji. MoUett (1876), L. R. 7 H. L. 802; 44 L. J. C.P. 362; 33L.T. 

544 158 

Robinson v. Nahon (1808), 1 Camp. 245 539 

Robinson n. Robinson (1879), L. R. 2 P. Dir. 76 ; 46 L.J. P. 47 ; 36 L. T. 

414 ; 25 W. R. 376 89 

Robinson v. Robinson and Lane (1868), 1 S. & T. 362 ; 27 L. J. P. & M. 91 ; 

5 Jur. N. S. 392 602, 662 

Robinson v. Sootney (1816), 19 Ves. 684 482 

Robinson v. Swett (1823),3 Greenl. 316 377, 1117 

Robinson t;. Touray (1813), 1 M. & Sel. 217; 3Canip.l58; 13R.R.781.. 1196 

Robinson v. United States (1871), 13 WaU. (80 U. S.) 363 782 

Robinson v. Vaughton (1838), 8 C. & P. 262 294 

Robinson v. Vernon, Ld. (1859), 7 C B. N. S. 236 ; 29 L. J. C. P. 310. .281, 746 

Robinson v. Wakefield, (1892), 30 L. R. Ir. 547 644 

Robinson v. Yarrow (1817), 7 Taun. 455 ; 1 Moore, 0. P. 150 ; 18 R. R. 

637 647, 548 

Robiason's case (1603), 5 Rep. 32 b 92 

Robson V. Alexander (1828), 1 M. & P. 448 517 

The references are to pages, nut to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clxxiX 

PAGE 

Robson V. Att.-Gen. (1843), 10 01. & Pin. 500 416, 422 

Eobsou V. Eaton (1785), 1 T. R. 62 1112 

Robson ». Kemp (1803), 4 Esp. 234 498, 611 

Robson V. N. East. Ry. Co. (1876), 46 L. J. Q. B. 50 ; 2 Q. B. D. 85; 

35 L. T. 535 ; 25 "W. R. 418 ' 38 

Robson V. Rolls (1833), 9 Bing. 648 ; 2 M. & Sc. 786 ; 2 L. J. C. P. 80 . . 379 

Rooh V. CaUen (1847), 6 Hare, 531 ; 17 L. J. Ch. 144 ; 12 Jur. 112 808 

Rochester, Dean and C. of, v. Pierce (1808), 1 Camp. 466 97, 643 

Rochfort ». Sedley (1861), 12 Ir. C. L. R. App. iv 475 

Roddam v. Morley (1857), 25 L. J. Ch. 329 ; 26 L. J. Ch. 438 ; 1 De G. 

6 J. 1 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 449 138, 448, 497, 720 

Rodenj). Lond. SmaUArmsCo. (1877),46L. J. Q. B. 213; 35 L. T. 505 ; 

25 W. R. 269 784 

Roden V. Ryde (1843), 4 Q. B. 626 ; 3 G. & D. 604 ; 12 L. J. Q. B. 276 ; 

7 Jnr. 213 1218 

Rodriques v. Melhuish (1854), 10 Ex. 110 ; 24 L. J. Ex. 26 178 

Rodriquezi;. Tadmire (1799), 2 Esp. 721 252 

RodweU V. Osgood (1825), 3 Peck. 379 82 

Rodwell V. Phillips (1842), 9 M. & W. 505 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 885 ; 11 L. J. 

Ex. 217 685, 686, 687 

RodweU V. Redge (1824), 1 C. & P. 220 105 

Roe «. Birkenhead, Lane, & Ches. Junot. Ry. Co. (1851), 7 Ex. 36; 

6 Railw. Cas. 795 ; 21 L. J. Ex. 9 643 

Roev. Davis (1806), 7 East, 363 300 

Roei). Day (1836), 7 C. & P. 705 484 

Roe V. Eerrars (1801), 2 Bos. & P. 548 485 

Roe jj. Harrison (1788), 2 T. R. 430; 1 E. R. 513 522 

Roe V. Harvey (1769), 4 Burr. 2084 109 

Roe». Hersey (1771), 3 WUs. 274 84 

Roe V. Ireland (1809), 11 East, 280 ; 10 R. R. 604 123 

Roe V. Minshal (1759), cited B. N. P. 96 522 

Roe V. Nix, (1892), Times Newspaper, 2Deoember, 1892, and following days. 1102 

Roe V. Parker (1792), 5 T. R. 32 402, 403 

Roe V. Rawlings (1815), 7 East, 291 ; 3 Smith, 254 ; 8 R. R. 632 87, 417, 

436, 437, 1227 

Roej-. Reade (1799), 8 T. R. 118 127 

Roe V. Wilkina (1835), 4 A. & E. 86 ; 6 N. & M. 434 1212 

Roe«. York, Axchb. of (1805), 6 East, 86; 2Smith, 166; 8R. R.413..128, 668, 669 

Rofeey V. Henderson (1851), 17 Q. B. 674 637 

RofEey v. Smith (1834), 6 C. & P. 622 223 

Rogers «. Allen (1808), 1 Camp. 309 ; 10 R. R. 689 432 

Rogers v. Custance (1839), 2 M. & Rob. 181 313 

Rogers v. Goodenough (1862), 2 S. & T. 342 ; 31 L. J. P. & M. 49 709 

Rogers v. Hadley (1863), 32 L. J. Ex. 241 ; 2 H. & C. 227 746 

Rogers v. Payne (1768), 2 Wils. 276 750 

Rogers ». Pitcher (1818), 6 Taun. 202 ; 1 Marsh. 641 99 

Rogers v. PoweU (1869), 38 L. J. Ch. 648 ; 18 W. R. 282 631 

Rogers ». Spenoe (1846), 12 CI. & Fin. 700 664 

Rogers ». Taylor (1858), 2 H. & N. 828; 27 L. J. Ex. 173 114, 115 

Rogers v. Wood (1831), 2 B. & Ad. 245 395, 406 

Rohan v. Hanson (1853), 11 Cush. (Mass.), 446 745 

Rokeby Peerage (1830), Pari. Min. 4 424 

Roles V. Davis (1859), 4 H. & N. 484 ; 1 E. & F. 563 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 287 ; 

33 L. T. 166 186, 191 

Rolf V. Dart (1809), 2 Taunt. 51 1018 

Rolfe, Ex parte, Re Spindler (1881), 19 Ch. D. 98; 61 L. J. Ch. 88; 

45 L. T. 482 ; 30 "W. R. 52 ; 46 J. P. 181 136 

Rolls V. Pearce (1877), 6 Ch. D. 730 ; 36 L. T. 438 ; 25 "W. R. 899 638 

RoUason v. Leon (1862), 7 H. & N. 73 : 31 L. J. Ex. 96 649 

Rolt V. White (1862), 3 De G. J. & S. 360 538 

Ronayne ». Sherrard (1877), 11 Ir. R. C. L. 146 682 

RonkendorflE v. Taylor (1830), 4 P«t. 349, 360 1173 

Rooke V. Ld. Kensington (1856), 2 Kay & J. 753 ; 25 L. J. Ch. 795 749 

Vol, I, ends with page 635, 



clxXX TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

Rooker v. Eooker and Newton (1864), 33 L. J. P. & M. 42 ; 3 S. & T. 526 ; 

9 Jur. N. S. 1329; 12 W. B. 807 149, ISO 

Rookwood'8 case (1696), 13 How. St. Tr. 139 236 

Roos Barony (1804), Mln. Ev. 145, cited Hubb. Ev. of Sue. 613 101)6 

Root V. King (1827), 7 Oowen, 613 255, 1093 

Ropps V. Barker (1826), 4 Pick. 239 i 86 

Rosoommou Peerage (1824), Pari. Min. 36 423, 425 

Rose V. Blakemore (1826), Ry. & M. 383 970 

Rose V. Bryant (1809), 2 Camp. 321 ; 11 R. R. 720 452 

Rose ». Cunynghame (1805), 11 Ves. 550 ; 12 Ves. 29 673 

Rose V. Himely (1808), 4 Cranch, 269 1142 

Rose V. N. East. Ry. Co. (1876), 2 Ex. Div. 248 ; 46 L. J. Ex. 374 ; 

35 L. T. 693 ; 26 "W. R. 205 38 

Rose V. Savory (1835), 2 Bing. N. C. 145 ; 2 Scott, 199 ; 4.L. J. C. P. 275.. 480 
Rosier, Re (1884), 26 Ch. Div. 821; 53 L. J. Ch. 722; 51 L. T. 785; 

32 "W. R. 825 5 

Rosa ». Bruce (1803), 1 Day, 100 289 

Ross V. Buhler (1824), 2 Mart. K. S. 312 899, 900 

Ross V. Clifton (1841), 11 A. & E. 631 ; 1 G. & D. 72 ; 9 Dowl. 1033 ; 10 

L. J. Q. B. 233 227 

Ross V. Gibbs (1869), L. R. 8 Eq. 522 ; 39 L. J. Ch. 61 599 

Ross V. Gould (1828), 3 Greenl. 204 27, 1183 

Ross V. Hill (1846), 2 C. B. 890 ; 3 D. & L. 788 ; 15 L. J. C. P. 182 . .161, 162 

Ross V. Lapham (1817), 14 Mass. 275 25S 

Rossi'. Parkyns (1875), L. R. 20Eq. 331 ; 44 L. J. Ch. 610; SOL. T. 331; 

24 W. R. 6 159 

Rossiter v. Miller (1878), 46 L. J. Ch. 228 ; L. R. 5 Ch. D. 648, 658 . .671, 673 

Rouch V. G. W. Ry. Co. (1841), 1 Q. B. 63 379, 380, 381 

RoupeU V. Haws (1863), 3 F. & F. 784 236, 609 

Rousillon V. Rousillon (1880), 14 Ch. D. 351 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 339 ; 42 L. T. 

679 ; 28 W. R 623 ; 44 J. P. 663 1146 

Routledge v. Hislop (I860), 29 L. J. M. C. 90 ; 2 E. & E. 549 1119 

Routledge v. Ramsay (1838), 8 A. & E. 222 ; 3 N. & P. 319 ; 1 W. W. 

& H. 232 ; 2 Jur. 789 ; 7 L. J. Q. B. 156 44, 712 

Rowan V. Jebb (1846), 10 Ir. Law R. 216 553 

Rowbotham v. "Wilson (1861), 6 E. & B. 593 ; 27 L. J. Q. B. 61 ; 30 L. J. 

Q. B. 49 ; 8 E. & B. 123 ; 8 H. L. Cas. 348 114 

Rowcliffle V. Leigh, Leigh's Estate, Re (1877), L. R. 4 Ch. D. 661 ; 

46 L. J. Ch. 60 ; 2S W. R. 56 1189 

Rowcroft V. Basset (1802), Pea. Add. Cas. 199, 200 454 

Rowe V. Brenton (1828), 8 B. & C. 737. .118, 232, 297, 437, 438, 441, 1036, 1040 

Rowe V. Carney (1885), 139 Mass. 41 616 

Rowe V. Grenfel (1824), Ry. & M. 398 118 

Rowe V. Osborne (1815), 1 Stark. R. 140 ; 18 R. R. 754 298 

Rowe V. Parker (1792), 5 T. R. 31 232 

Rowe V. Rowe (1848), 2 De G. & Sm. 297 ; 17 L. J. Ch. 357 806 

Rowe «. Tipper (1853), 13 C. B. 249 ; 22 L. J. C. P. 135; 17 Jur. 440. . .. 32 

Rowland v. Ashby (1826), Ry. & M. 232 679 

Rowlands v. De Veoohi (1882), Cab. & E. 10 159, 454 

Rowlands v. Samuel (1850), 11 Q. B. 41, n. ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 65 30 

Rowley v. Home (1825), 3 Bing. 2 1096 

Rowley v. Lond. & N. W. Ry. Co. (1873), 42 L. J. Ex. 163 ; L. R. 8 Ex. 

221 C^'^l, 935 

Rowntree v. Jacob (1809), 2 Taun. 141 92 

Royal Aquarium v. Parkinson, (1892) 1 Q. B. 431 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 409; 

66 L. T. 513 ; 40 W. R. 450 ; 56 J. P. 4(i4 869 

Royal Bank, &c. v. Tottenham (1894). 9 R. 569 ; (1894) 2 Q. B. 715 ; 64 

L. J. Q. B. 99; 61 L. T. 522 ; 43 W. R. 22 Add. [5461 

RoyalEx. Ass. Co.». Moore(1863),2New.Ca.63; 8L.T.242; 11W.R.592. 758 
Royle V. Harris, (189.5) P. 16S ; 64 L. J. P. 6a ; 43 W. R. 362 ; 72 L. T. 

474 Add. [699] 

Rudd». Wright (1832), 1 Ph. Ev. 240. . .. ,., 396, 440 

Ruddock V. Marsh (1857), 1 H. & N. 601 166 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clxxxi 

PAOB 

Rudge ». M'Oarthy (1841), 4 Ir. L. R. 161 285 

Rugg V. Kingsmill (1867), L. R. 1 Adm. & Ecc. 343 ; 36 L. J. Eoo. 17 . . 130 
RumbaU v. Met. Bank (1877), 2 Q. B. D. 194 ; 46 L. J. Q. B. 346 ; 36 

L. T. 240 ; 25 W. E. 366 6, 543 

Rumsev v. Reade (1876), 1 Ch. D. 643 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 489 ; 33 L. T. 803 ; 

24 W. R. 245 534 

Rush V. Peacock (1838), 2 M. & Rob. 162 311, 510 

Rush V. Smith (1834), 1 C. M. & R. 94 ; 2 Dowl. 687 ; 4 Tyr. 675 ; 3 L. J. 

Ex. 355 942 

Rushworth v. Lady Pembroke (1668), Hardr. 472 1116 

Russel V. Rusael (1783), 1 Bro. 0. C. 269 ; 12 Ves. 197 682 

Russell, Ex parte (1812), 1 Rose, 278 866 

Rusaell, Ex parte, Re Butterworth (1882), 51 L. J. Ch. 521 ; 19 Ch. D. 

588; 46 L. T. 113; 30 W. R. 584 135 

RusseU V. Coffin (1829), 8 Pick. 143 927 

Russell V. Dickson (1842), 2 Dr. & War. 139 740 

Russell V. Dickson (1853), 4 H. L. Cas. 293 805 

RusseU t). Jackson (1851), 9 Hare, 392 ; 21 L. J. Ch. 146 ; 15 Jur. 117. .592, 593, 6(14 

Russell V. LangstafBe (1780), 2 Doug. 514 1206 

RusseU V. Rider (1834), 6 C. & P. 416 928, 960 

Russell*. St. Aubyn(1876),2Ch.D.398;46L.J. Ch. 6tl;35L. T.395 .806,1153 
RusseU V. Smyth (1842), 9 M. & W. 810 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 929 ; 11 L. J. Ex. 

308 1142, 1146, 1217 

Rust V. Baker (1837), 8 Sim. 443 172 

RuateU V. Macqmster (1809), 1 Camp. 49, n 244 

Rutherford, Re (1880), 14 Ch. D. 687 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 654 ; 43 L. T. 105 ; 

28 "W. R. 802 716 

Rutland's, Countess of, case (1605), 6 Co. Rep. 54a 83, 743 

Rutterw. Chapman (1841), 8 M. & "W. 388 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 118; 5 Jur. 

610 ; 11 L. J. Ex. 178 475 

Rutter V. Tregent (1879), 48 L. J. Ch. 791 ; 12 Ch. D. 768 ; 41 L. T. 16 : 

27 W. R. 902 ; 221 

RyaU V. Hannam (1847), 10 Beav. 536 ; 16 L. J. Ch. 491 ; 11 Jur. 761 . . 798 

Ryan v. Dolan (1872), I. R. 7 Eq. 92 818 

Ryan v. Nolan (1864-5), I. R. 3 C. L. 319 166 

Ryan v. Ring (1890), 25 L. R. Ir. 184 1170 

Ryan v. Ryan (1816), 2 PhiU. Boo, L. 332 1144 

Ryan v. Ryan (1889), 25 L. R. Ir 185 455, 457 

Ryan v. Sams (1848), 1 2 Q. B. 460 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 271 ; 12 Jur. 745 169 

Ryberg v. Ryberg (1863), 32 L. J. P. & M. 112 ; 11 W. R. 502 939 

Ryder v. Malbome (1831), cited 2 Russ. & My. 169 418 

Ryder v. WombweU (1868), 38 L. J. Ex. 8 ; L. R. 4 Ex. 32 ; 19 L. T. 

491; 17W. R. 167 28,48,49 



Sadlbb*. Robins (1808), 1 Camp, 255 1142, 1153, 1154 

Sadlier v. Biggs (1853), 4 H. L. Cas. 435 ; 10 Ir. Eq. R. 522 297, 792 

Sage V. Wilcox (1826), 6 Conn. 81 669 

Sainsbnry v. Matthews (1838), 4 M. & W. 347 ; 8 L. J. Ex. 1 ; 7 Dowl. 23 . . 187, 

194, 686 

St. Catherine's Hospital case (1672), 1 Vent. 151 1179 

St. Devereux v. Much Dew Church (1761-2), 1 W. Bl. 367 295 

St, George v. St. Margaret (1706), 1 Salk. 123 102 

St. Losky V. Green (1860), 9 C. B. N. S. 370 ; 2 P. & F. 106 ; 30 L. J. C. P. 

191 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 394 ; 3 L. T. 297 ; 9 W. R. 119 188, 194 

Sainter v. Ferguson (1849), 7 C. B. 727 ; 18 L. J. C. P. 217 44 

SainthiU v. Bound (1802), 4 Eep. 74 957 

Sale V. Lambert (1874), L. R. 18 Eq. 1 ; 43 L. J. Ch. 470 ; 22 W. R. 478. . 671 

Salisbury v. MarshaU (1829), 4 C. & P. 65 774 

SaUsbury, M. of v. Gt. North. Ry. Co. (1858), 5 C. B. N. S. 174 ; 28 L. J. 

C. P. 40 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 70 112 

Salkeld v. Johnson (1841), 1 Hare, 186 ; 11 L. J. Ch. 201 7-'> 

Salkeld». Johnson (1816), 2 C. B. 749 75 

SaUield v. Johnson (1846, should be 1848), 2 Ex. 256 ; 18 L. J. Ex 89 . . 75 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



Clxxxii TABLE OP CASES CITED. 

FAOE 

Salmkyrburg v. Pomansky (1884), 12 Q. B. D. 218 ; 53 L. J. Q. B. 428 ; 

32 W. R. 752 834 

Salmon v. Webb (1852), 3 H. L. Cas. 510 ; 13 Q. B. 886 757 

Saloucci V. Woodmass (undated), 2 Park. Ins. 727 1149 

Saltev. Thomas (1802), 3 B. & P. 188 1050, 1061, 1172 

Saltmarsh t>. Hardy (1873), 42 L. J. Ch. 422 495 

Sammons».BaiIey(1890),24Q.B.D. 727; o9L. J.Q.B.342; 38W.K.605.. 964 

Sampson v. Yardley (1667), 2 Keb. 223, pi. 74, 19 Car. 2 367 

Sanborn v. Neilson (1828), 4 New. Hamps. 501 515 

Sanders v. Maclean (1883), 11 Q. B. D. 327 ; 52 L. J. Q. B. 481 ; 49 L. T. 

462 ; 31 W. R. 698 6 

Sanders v. Meredith (1828), 3 M. & Ry. 116 451 

Sanders v. St. Neot's Union (1846), 8 Q. B. 810 ; 15 L. J. M. C. 104 ; 10 

Jur. 566 641, 644 

Sanders v. Sanders (1882), 19 Ch. D. 380; 51 L. J. Ch. 279 ; 45 L. T. 637; 

30 W. R. 281 721 

Sanderson v. CoUman (1843), 4 M. & Gr. 209 ; 4 Scott, N. R. 638 ; 11 L. J. 

C. P. 270 90, 547 

Sanderson v. Graves (1876), L. R. 10 Ex. 234 ; 44 L. J. Ex. 210 ; 33 L. T. 

269 ; 11 L. J. P. 270 ; 33 W. R. 797 752 

Sanderson v. Nestor (1826), Ry. & M. 402 1139 

Sandersons. Symonds (1819), IB. & B. 430 ; 4 Moore (C. P.) 42. .1194, 1195, 1201 
Sanderson v. Westley (1840), 6 M. & W. 98 ; 8 Dowl. 412 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 204 732 

Sandford v. Remington (1793), 2 Ves. 189 ; 2 R. R. 195 611 

Sandilands, Re (1871), L. R- 6 C. P. 411 ; 24 L. T. 273 ; 19 W. R. 641 . . 134 

Sandilands v. Marsh (1819), 2 B. & Aid. 673 161, 386 

Sandys V. Hodgson (183tf), 10 A. & E. 472 ; 2 P. &D. 435 ; 9 L. J. Q. B. 31 . . 542, 549 

Sanford v. Chase (1824), 3 Cowen, 381 869 

Sanford v. Raikes (1816), 1 Mer. 6.i3 784 

Sangster v. Mazarredo (1816), 1 Stark. 161 495 

Saph«. Atkinson (1822), 1 Add. 215 1223 

Sarell v. Wine (1803), 3 East, 409 714 

Sargesout). Sealy (1742), 2 Atk. 412 1102 

Sari V. BourdiUon (1856), 26 L. J. C. P. 78 ; 1 C. B. N. S. 188 ; 2 Jur. 

N. S. 1208 670, 671, 672 

Sastry Velaider v. Sembecutty (1881), 6 App. Cas. 364 ; 50 L. J. P. C. 28 ; 

44 L. T. 896 149 

Satterthwaite v. Powell (1838), 1 Curt. 705 174 

Saunders, Re (1865), 35 L. J. P. & M. 26 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 16 ; 11 Jur. 

N. S. 1027 ; 14 W. R. 148 702 

Saunders v. Bates (1867), 1 H. & N. 402 189 

Saunders d. Cramer (1842), 3 Dr. & War. 187 669 

Saunders v. MiUs (1829), 3 M. & P. 620 ; 6 Biug. 213 245 

Saunders v. Saunders (1848), 6 Notes of Cases, 518 143 

Saunders v. Topp (1849), 4 Ex. 390 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 374 689, 690 

Saunderson ». Jackson (18i)0), 2 B. & P. 238 ; 3 Esp. 180 ; 6 R. R. 680.. 674, 675 

Sauudersou v. Judge (1796), 2 H. Bl. 609 ; 3 R. R. 492 165 

Savage v. (1780), 1 Doug. 366, n. 4 151 

Savage v. Binney (1834), 2 Dowl. 643 341 

Savage*. Canning (1867), I. R. 1 C. L. 434 188 

Savage v. Hutchinson (1855), 24 L. J. Ch. 232 ; 2 Eq. R. 368 1030 

Saveryf. King (1866), 6 H. L. C. 627, 665, 656; 2 Jur. N. S. 603; 25 

L. J. Ch. 482 137 

Sawyer*. Birchmore (1836), 3 My. &K 672 693, 608 

Sawyer ». Eifert (1820), 2 Nott. & M'C. 511 265 

Sawyer v. Maine Fire and Mar. Ins. Co. (1839), 12 Mass. 291 1147 

Saye and Sele Peer. (1846), 1 H. of L. Cas. 507 101, 1093 

Sayer v. Glossop (1848), 2 Ex. 409 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 300 1229 

Sayer v. Kitchen (1791), 1 Esp. 200 1191 

Sayer v. WagstaflE (1842), 5 Beav. 462 ; 13 L. J. Ch. 161 ; 3 Jur. 1083 . . 923 

Sayers v. Walsh (1848), 12 Ir. L. R. 436 616 

Sayre v. Hughes (1868), L. R. 5 Eq. 376 ; 37 L. J. Ch. 401 ; 16 W. R. 

662 ; 18 L. T. 347 : 666 

Sayward*. Stevens (1854), 69 Mass. (3 Gray), 97— 102 767 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clxxxiii 

FAOB 

Scaife v. Farrant (1875), 44 L. J. Ex. 36, 235 ; L. R. 10 Ex. 358 ; 33 L. T. 

278; 23 W. E. 840 772 

Scales V. Key (1840), 11 A. & E. 819 ; 3 P. & D. 50.5 168 

Scaramanga «. Stamp (1880), 6 C. P. D. 295 ; 49 L. J. C. P. 674 ; 42 L. T. 

804 ; 28 "W. K. 691 770 

Soheibel v. Eairbairn (1799), 1 Bob. & P. 388 37 

Sohibsby v. Westenholz (1870), 40 L. J. Q. B. 73 ; L. R. 6 Q. B. 165 ; 24 

L. T. 93 ; 19 W. R. 587 1147 

Sohmeltz v. Avery (1851), 16 Q. B. 655 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 228 ; 15 Jur. 291.. 759 

Schneider v. Norris (1814), 2 M. & Sel. 286 ; 15 R. R. 250 675 

Schofield, Ex parte, In re Eirtb (1877), 6 Ch. D. 230 ; 46 L. J. Bank. 112 ; 

37 L. T. 281; 26 W. R. 9 966 

Schofield ji. Heap (1859), 28 L. J. Ch. 104; 27Beav.93; 4 Jur. N. S. 1067.. 806 
Schofield V. Londesborough (Lord), (1895) 14 R. (March), 233 ; (1895) 1 Q. B. 

536 ; 64 L. J. Q. B. 293 ; 72 L. T. 46 ; 43 "W. R. 331 Add. [1205] 

Soholesf. Chadwick(1843), 2 M. & Rob. 507 446, 511 

Scholea v. HUton (1842), 10 M. & W. 15 ; 2 Dowl. N. S. 229 ; 11 L. J. 

Ex. 332 832, 833 

Scholey v. Goodman (1823), 1 Bing. 349 : 8 Moore, C. P. 350 ; 1 C. & P. 36.. 501 

Scholey v. Walton (1844), 12 M. & W. 514 ; 13 L. J. Ex. 122 4S2 

Schultz V. Aatley (1836), 2 Bing. N. C. 544 ; 2 Scott, 815 ; 1 Hodges, 542; 

7 C. & P. 99 547, 1205 

Schwalbe, The (1861), Lush. 239 ; 14 Moo. P. C. C. 241 ; 4 L. T. 160. . . . 178 

Sooones v. Morrell (1839), 1 Beav. 251 , 112 

Scorell V. Boxall (1827), 1 T. & J. 396 687 

Scott V. Bentley (1855), 24 L. J. Ch. 244 ; 1 K. & J. 281 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 394.. 1150 

Scott V. BourdilUon (1806), 2 Bos. & P. N. R. 213 ; 9 R. R. 644 763 

Soott V. Brown (1892), 4 R. 42 ; 2 Q. B. 724 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 738 ; 41 

"W. E. 116 ; 67 L. T. 782 ; 57 J. P. 213 7 

Scott t). Clare (1812), 3 Camp. 236 293 

Scott «. Commonwealth (1893), 42 Am. St. R. 371 Add. [569] 

Scott V. Crawford (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 1031 ; 5 Scott, N. R. 781 545 

Scott V. Fenoulhett (1784), 1 Cox, Ch. R. 79 803 

Scott V. Irving (1830), 1 B. & Ad 605 158 

Scottv. Jones (1813), 4 Taun. 865; 14 R. E. 686 289, 318 

Scott V. LifPord (1808), 9 East, 347 ; 1 Camp. 246 32 

Scott V. Lond.DockCo. (186,5), 34 L.J. Ex. 220; 3 H.&C. 596; 13 L.T. 148 163 

Scott V. Marshall (1832), 2 C. & J. 238 ; 2 Tyr. 257 ; 1 L. J. Ex. 97 496 

Scott V. Miller (1859), 1 Johns. 328 965 

Soott V. Oxford, Ld. (1808), Peake, 170, n. a ; BuU, N. P. 7 244 

Scott ■„. Pilkington (1862), 31 L. J. Q. B. 81 ; 2 B. & S. 11 ; 6 L. T. 

21 1 140, 1154 

Soott v. Sampson (1882), 8 Q. B. D. 491 ; 51 L. J. Q. B. 380 ; 46 L. T. 

412 ; 30 W. E. 541 ; 46 J. P. 408 255 

Scott 4). Scott (1859), 1 S. &T. 258 703 

Scott V. Shearman (1775), 2 W. Bl. 977 1103 

Scott V. Stansfield (1868), L. R. 3 Ex. 220 ; 37 L. J. Ex. 155 ; 18 L. T. 

572 ; 16 W. R. 911 1099 

Scott V. Waithmau (1822), 3 Stark. 168 1213 

Scott V. Walker (1853), 2 E. & B. 555 ; 22 L. J. Q. B. 404 ; 17 Jur. 916. . 1185 

Soouler v. Plowright (1856), 10 Moo. P. C. R. 440, 444—446 140 

Sorutton V. Childs (1877), 36 L. T. 212 740, 766 

Sea Nymph, The (1860), Lush. Adm. R. 23 176 

Seago V. Deane (1828), 4 Bing. 459 ; 1 M. & P. 227 ; 3 C. & P. 170 754 

Seale-Hayne v. Jodrell, (1891) A. C. 304 ; 65 L. T. 57 740 

Seaman v. Netherclift (1876), 1 C. P. D. 540 ; 45 L. J. C. P. 798 ; 34 L. 

T. 878 ; 24 W. R. 884 86S 

Searle v. Barrington, Ld. (1728), 2 Str. 826 ; 8 Mod. 278 ; 2 Ld. Raym. 

1370; 3Bro. P. C. 593 447, 451 

Searle v. Keeves (1797), 2 Esp. 598 691 

Searle v. Laverick (1874), L. R. 9 Q. B. 122 ; 43 L. J. Q. B. 43 ; 30 L. T. 

89 ; 22 W. E. 367 772 

Searle v. Price (1816), 2 Hagg. Cons. 189 603 

Searle v. Eeynolds (1866), 7 B. & S. 704 ; 14 L. T. 618 107 

Vol. I. ends with pof/e 636. 



clxxxiv TABLE OF CASES CITED, 

PAOE 

Searlea v. Scirlett, (1892) 2 Q. B. 56 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 673 ; 66 L. T. 8'^7 ; 

40 W. R. 696 ; 56 J. P. 789 1005 

Seddon v. Tutop (1796), 6 T. R. 607 ; 1 Esp. 401 ; 3 R. R. 274 1123 

Seed V. Higg-ins (I860), 8 H. L. Gas. 550, 561, 666 ; 30 L. J. Q. B. 314 ; 

6 Jur. N. S. 1264 43, 47 

Selby V. Harris (1698), 1 Ld. Raym. 745 1013, 1044 

Selby V. Hills (1832), 8 Bing. 166 ; 1 Dowl. 257 ; 1 M. & So. 253 ; 1 L. J. 

C. P. 65 866,870 

Selby f. Selby (1817), 3 Mar. 2; 17 R. R. 1 674 

Selden v. Williams (1839), 9 Watts, 9 7Sr 

Selfes;. Isaacson (1858), 1 P. & F. 194 917,918 

Sellers v. Till (1825), 4 B. & C. 655 151 

Sells V. Hoare (1822), 3 B. & B. 232 ; 7 Moure (C. P.), 36 906 

Sells V. Sells (1860), 29 L. J. Ch. 600 ; 1 Dr. & Sm. 42 ; 8 W. R. 327 .... 749 
Selmes v. Judge (1871), L. R. 6 Q. B. 724 ; 40 L. J. Q. B. 287 ; 24 L. T. 

905; 19 W. R. 1110 226 

Selway v. Chappell (1841), 12 Sim. 113 ; 10 L. J. Ch. 323 910 

Selwood V. Mildmay (1797), 3 Ves. 306 ; 4 R. R. 1 8«2 

Selwyn's case (1831), 3 Hag^. Eco. 748 174 

Senior v. Armytage (1816), Holt, N. P. R. 197 ; 17 R. R. 627 (US 

Serle». Norton (1841), 2 M. ^ Rob. 401. 404, u. {d) 32 

Seton V. Slade (1802), 7 Ves. 27n ; 6 R. R. 124 675 

Sewellu. Corp (1824), 1 C. & P. 392 1178 

Sewell 0. Evans (1843), 4 Q. B. 626; 12 L. J. Q. B. 276; 3 G. & D. 

604 1218,1219 

Seymour v. Maddox (1851), 16 Q. B. 326 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 327 778 

Shaftesbury, Ld. v. Digby, Ld. (1676), 3 Keb nn 900 

Shah Mukhum LaU v. Nawab Im. Dowlah (1865), 10 Moo. Ind. App. C. 

362 711 

Shand v. Bowes (1877), 1 Q. B. D. 470 ; 4.i L. J. Q. B. 507 ; 2 App. Cas. 

455 ; 46 L. J. Q. B. 661 ; 36 L. T 857 ; 25 W. R. 730 42 

Shankland v. City of Washington (1831), 5 Pet. 394 758 

Shannon v. Bi-adstreet (1803), 1 Soh. & Lef. 7H ; 9 R. R. 11 670 

Shapcott V. ChappeU (1883), 12 Q. B. D. 68 ; 53 L. J. Q. B. 77 ; 32 W. R. 

183 1232 

Shardlow v. Cotterill (1881), 20 Ch. D. 90 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 353 ; 45 L. T. 

672; 30 W. R. 143 670, 672 

Sharmau ». Brandt (1871), L. R. 6 Q. B. 720 ; 40 L. J. Q. B. 312 ; 19 W. 

R. 956 668 

Sharp f . Carter (1735), 3 P. Wms. 375 961 

Sharp V. Leach (1862), 31 Beav. 491 ; 10 W. R. 878 137 

Sharp V. Newsholme (1839), 5 Bing. N. C. 713 ; 8 Soott, 23 ; 3 Jur. 581 ; 

9 L. J. C. P. 21 1 377 

Sharp V. Scoging (1817), Holt, N. P. R. 641 973 

Sharpe v. Bingley (1817), 1 Mill. R. 373 927 

Sharpe v. Lamb (1840), 11 A. & E. 805 ; 3 P. & D. 454 ; 4 Jur. 965 . .310, 475 
Shatwell ■„. Hall (1842), 10 M. & W. 523 ; 2 Dowl N. S. 667 ; 12 L. J. 

Ex. 74 227 

Shaw, Ex parte (1821), Jao. 270 321 

Shaw V. Att.-Gen. (1870), L. R. 2 P. & D. 156 ; 39 L. J. P. 81 ; 23 L. T. 

322; 18 W. R. 1145 1143 

Shawf. Beck (1853), 8 Ex. 392 272 

Shaw j;. Bran (1816), 1 Stark. R. 319; 18 R. R. 772 135 

Shaw». Broom (18241, 4 Dowl. & R. 731 511, 513 

Shaw*. Gould (1868), L. R. 3 H. L. 56; 37 L.J. Ch. 433; ISL. T. 833.. 1144 

Shaw V. Markham (1791), Pea. R. 166 317 

Shaw «. Neville, cited Greenleaf on Ev. 15th pd 369 . . , 698 

Shaw V. Picton (1825), 7 Dowl. & R. 201 ; 4 B. & C. 715 642 

Shaw V. Port Philip Gold Mining Co. (1884), 13 Q. B. D. 103 ; 63 L. J. 

Q. B. 369 ; 50 L. T. 685 ; 32 W. R. 771 687 

Shaw«>. Shaw (1862), 31 L. J. P. & M. 96 ; 2 S. & T. 642 873 

Shearman v. Pyke (1724), cited 3 Curteis, 639 -642 702 

Shearn, In goods of (1880), 50 L. J. P. 16 ; 43 L. T. 736 ; 29 W. R. 446 ; 

45 J. P. 308 707 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED, clxxxv 

PAGB 

Shedden v. Att.-Gen. and Patrick (1861), 30 L. J. P. & M. 217 ; 2 S. & T. 

170 408, 409,412, 415, 1103, 1109 

Shedden v. Patrick (1854), 1 Macq. 535 ; 1 Paterson, 332 1132, 1133 

Sheehy v. The Profess. Life Assur. Co. (1853), 13 0. B. 787: 22 L. J. 

C. P. 244 1148 

Sheen v. Bumpstead (1863), 2 H. & C. 193 ; 32 L. J. Ex. 271 ; 8 L. T. 

832 ; 11 W. R. 734 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 242 242 

ShefBeld & Manch. Ey. Co. ». Woodcock (1841), 7 M. & W. 574: 2 Eailw. 

C. 522 ; 11 L. J. Ex. 26 641 

Sheldon v. Clark (1806), 1 Johns. 613 267 

SheUy v. "Wright (1737), Willes, 9 n 

Shelton V. Braithwaite (1841), 7 M. & W. 436 ; 5 Jur. 28, 32, 671 

Shelton v. Springett (1851), 1 1 C. B. 452 168 

Shephard v. Payne (1863), 3 N. R. 580 ; 16 C. B. N. S. 132 ; 33 L. J. G P. 

158; lOL. T. 193; 12 W. E. 581 ; 10 Jur. N. 8. 640 124,791 

Shepheard v. Beetham (1872), L. E. 2 P. & D. 384 ; 41 L. J. P. 44 844 

Shepherd v. Chewter (1808), 1 Camp. 274 ; 10 E. E. (.81 552 

Shepherd v. Currie (1816), 1 Stark. E. 454 164 

Shepherd v. Hills (1857), 26 L. J. Ex. 6 ; 11 Ex. 65 76 

Shepherd v. Hodsman (1852), 18 Q. B. 316 ; 21 L. J. Q. B. 263 ; 16 Jur. 948 649 

Shepherd v. Mackoul (1813), 3 Camp. 326 ; 14 E. R, 752 166 

Shepherd v. Pybus (1842), 3 M. & Gr. 880 ; 4 Scott, N. E. 434 ; 11 L. J. 

C. p. 101 776, 777 

Shepherd «. Sharp (1856), 25 L. J. Ex. 264 ; 1 H. & N. 115 228 

Shepherd v. Shorthose (1719), 1 Str. 412 1046 

bheppard v. Gosnold (1673), Vaugh. 169 792 

Sheridan and Kirwan's case (1811), 31 How. St. Tr. 673 295 

Sheridan v. The New Quay Co. (1858), 28 L. J. C. P. 68 ; 4 C. B. N. S. 

618 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 248 546 

Sherlock i;. Passman (1836), 7 C. & P. 292, 293 39, 259 

Sherman v. Sherman (l787), 2 Vera. 2T6 625 

Sberratt v. Montford (1873), 42 L. J. Ch. 688 ; L. E. 8 Ch. 928 ; 21 W E 

719 793 

Sherrington's case (183«), 2 Lew. C. C. 123 566 

Sherrington v. Jermyn (182M), 3 C. & P. 374 ..'. 1208 

ShickemeU V. Hotham (1854), 1 Kay, 669 "" 713 

Shiel V. O'Brien (1872), I. E. 7 Eq, 64 704 

Shields v. Boucher (1847), 1 De G. & Sm. 61 418, 419 420 421 

Shiells V. Blackburne (1789), 1 H. Bl. 158 ; 2 E. E. 750 '. . ' 39 

Shiels V. Cannon (1865), 16 Ir. C. L. E. 588 777 

Shilcock (should be Sherlock) v. Passman (18:16), 7 C. & P. 292, 293 . . 39 259 

Shipworth v. Green (1725), 8 Mod. 311 ; 1 Str. 610 " ' '92 

Shirley t). Todd (1832), 9 Greenl. 83 "" 511 

Shore v. Bedford (1843), 5 M. & Gr. 27I ; 12 L. J. C. P. 138 60' 607 

Shore v Wilson (1842), 9 CI. & Fin. 365, 625 741, 744, 761, 762, 763,'764, 

784, 788, 789, 790 

Short V. Lee (1821), 2 Jac. & W. 464 396, 434, 435, 437, 441, 442, 443 447 

Short V. Stoy (1836), cited Eoscoe, N. P. Evid. 65, 86 528 

Short :;. Williams (1835), 4 Dowl. 357 " 15 

Shortrede ji. Cheek (1834), 1 A. &E. 57; 3N.&M. 866;' s'l.'JIk.B.' 125. .670,671 

Shott V. Strealfield (1830), 1 M. & Eob. 8 372 

Shower D. Pilck (1849), 4 Ex. 478 ; 19L.J.Ex.ll3 .."!.'!!!!!!!!!!!'.!! 639 

Shrewsbury's (Lady) case (1612), 2 How. St. Tr. 773 '.'.'.'.'.'. 573 

Shrewsbury Peer. (1867), 7 H. L. C. 1 309, 403, 414, 425, 426, 1047," 1092, 

1167, 1224 
Shropshire Union Ey. & Canal Co. v. E. (1876), L! E. 7 H. L. 496 • 4S 

L. J. Q. B. 31; 32 L. T. 283; 23 W. E. 7"9,... 1076 

Shuttleworth v. Le Fleming (1865), 19 C. B. N. S. 687 ; 34 L. J. C P 369' 

11 Jur. N. S. 840 ; 14 W. E. 13 76 722 

Sibbering v. Baloarras (1860), 3 De G. & Sm. 735 ; 19 L. J. Ch.'252 ;" 14 ' 

Jur. 753 J28 

Siohel V. Lambert (1864), 15 C. B. N, S. 781 ; 33 L. J. C. P. 137;' Vo" Ju!r" 

N. S. 617 ; 12 W. R. 312 129, 149 

Yol. I. ends withpaae 635, 



clxxxvi TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOB 

Siddons v. Lawrence (1879), 4 Ex. D. 176 ; 48 L. J. Ex. 446 ; 40 L. T. 

796 ; 27 W. B. 791 .....' *1 

Siddons 5). Short (1877), 2 C. P. D. 572 ; 46 L.J. C. P. 795; 37L.T. 230.. 114 
Sidebottom ». Adkins (1858), 27 L. J. Ch. 152; 30 L. T. 163; 6 W. R. 

97 964 

Sideways v. Dyson (1817), 2 Stark. 49 956, 1191 

Sidmouth v. Sidmouth (1840), 2 Beav. 447 ; 9 L. J. Ch. 282 666, 806 

Sidney, Algernon, case of (1683), 9 How. St. Tr. 854 385 

Sidwell V. Mason (1857), 2 H. & N. 306 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 407 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 

649 711 

Sievewright v. Archibald (1851), 17 Q. B. 115 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 529 ; 15 

Jur. 947 297, 299 

Siggers v. Evans (1855), 5 E. & B. 367 ; 3 C. L. B. 1209 ; 24 L. J. Q. B. 

705 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 8.51 639 

Sikes V. Wild (1861), 30 L. J. Q. B. 325 ; 32 L. J. Q. B. 375 ; 1 B. & S. 

587 ; 4 B. & S. 421 ; 8 L. T. 652 ; 11 W. B. 954 773 

Silberman t). Clark (1884), 96 N. T. 524 763 

Silkstone and Dodsworth Coal and Iron Co., Be Whitworth's case (1881), 

19 Ch. D. 118; 51L. J. Ch. 71 ; 45L. T. 449; 30W. B. 33 845 

Sillick V. Booth (1841), 1 T. & C. C. C. 117 ; 11 L. J. Ch. 41 173, 175 

Sills ». Brown (1840), 9 C. & P. 601 340, 935 

Silver v. Stein (1852), 21 L. J. Ch. 312 ; 1 Drew. 295 1151 

Simmt;. Anglo- Amer. Tel. Co. (1880), 6 Q. B. D. 188; 49 L. J. Q. B. 

392 ; 42 L. T. 37 ; 28 W. B. 290 ; 44 J. P. 280 541 

Simmonds, Be (1842), 3 Curt. 79 694 

Simmonds v. Andrews (1839), 1 Jebb & Sy. 531 7 

Simmonds v. Humble (1862), 13 C. B. N. S. 258 : 9 L. T. 168 690 

Simmonds v. Simmonds (1847), 6 Notes of Cas. (Eoc. & Mar.) 324 631 

Simmons v. London Joint Stock Bank, (1891) 1 Ch. 270 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 313 ; 

62 L. T. 427 ; 63 L. T. 789 ; 39 W. B 449 ; (ia92) A. C. 201 ; 61 L. J. 

Ch. 723 ; 66 L. T. 625 ; 41 "W. B. 108 ; 56 J. P. 644 390 

Simmons v. Mitchell (1881), 6 App. Cas. 156 ; 50 L. J. P. C. 11 ; 43 L.T. 

710 ; 29 "W. E. 401 ; 45 J. P. 237 929 

Simmons*. Budall (1850), 1 Sim. N.S. 115, 136,137; 15 Jur. N. S. 162.. 142, 1192 

Simmons v. Simmons (1847), 1 Boberts. 566 502 

Simma v. Henderson (1848), 11 Q. B. 1015 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 209 348, 1037 

Simons v. Great West. By. Co. (1857), 18 C. B. N. S. 805 ; 2 C. B. N. S. 

620 ; 26 L. J. C. P. 25 722 

Simons v. Patohett (1857), 26 L. J. Q. B. 195 ; 7 E. & B. 568 ; 3 Jur. 

N. S. 742 780 

Simpson*. Dendy (1860), 8 C. B. N. S. 433; 6 Jur. N. S. 11H7 112 

Simpson v. Dismore (1841), 9 M. & W. 47 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 357 ; 5 Jur. 

1012 ; 11 L. J. Ex. 137 1217 

Simpson v. Elamank (1867), L. B. 1 P. C. 463 ; 36 L. J. Ecc. 28 77 

Simpson v. Fogo (1860), 1 J. & H. 18 ; 1 H. & M. 195 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 403 ; 

32 L. J. Ch. 249; 11 W. B. 418; 8 L. T. 61 1103, 1146, 1147 

Simpson v. Grayson (1892), 26 Amer. St. B. 52 254 

Simpson *. Lond. Gen. Omnibus Co. (1873), 42 L. J. C. P. 112 ; L. B. 8 

C. P. 390 ; 38 L. T. 560 ; 21 W. B. 595 771 

Simpson v. Margitson (1847), 11 Q. B. 23 ; 17 L. J. Q. B. 81 ; 12 Jur. 

155 16, 741, 763, 784 

Simpson v. Pickering (1834), 1 C. M. & B. 529 ; 5 Tyr. 143 ; 4 L. J. Ex. 20. 1112 
Simpson v. Eobinson (1848), 12 Q. B. 511 ; 18 L. J. Q. B. 73 ; 13 Jur. 

187 245, 623, 527 

Simpson v. Smith (1822), 2 Ph. Ev. 397 942 

Sims!!. Marryat (1851), 17 Q. B. 281; 20 L. J. Q. B. 454 4, 775 

Sims V. Thomas (1841), 3 Ir. L. R. 417 1147, 1154 

Sinclair v. Baggaley (1838), 4 M. & W. 312 ; 1 H. & H. 294 ; 2 Jur. 683 ; 

7 L. J. Ex. 305 146, 147 

Sinclair i>. Eraser (1771), cited 20 How. St. Tr. 468 ; 1 Doug. 4, n 1154 

Sinclair!). Sinclair (1798), 1 Hagg. Const. 297 1145, 1150 

Sinclair ». Sinclair (1846), 13 M. & W. 640; 14 L. J. Ex.109 488, UU 

' The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clxxxvil 

PAGB 

Sinclair v. Stevenson (182i), 1 C. & P. 585 ; 2 Bing. 514 . . . .310, 311, 747, 927, 

928, 960 

Singleton v. Barrett (1832), 2 C. & J. 368 ; 2 Tyr. 409 ; 1 L. J. Ex. 134 293 

Singleton v. St. Louis, &o. (1877), 66 Mo. 63 763 

Singleton ». Tombneon (1878), 3 App. Cas. 404 ; 38 L. T. 653 ; 26 W. B. 

722 701 

Sinquaei, The (1880), 5 P. D. 241 ; 50 L. J. P. D. & A. 5 ; 43 L. T. 768 . . 178 

Siordet v. Kuozinski (1855), 17 C. B. 251 ; 25 L. J. C. P. 2 282 

Sisaons v. Dixon (1826), 5 B. & C. 758 ; 8 D. & R. 526 105 

Skaife v. Jackson (1«21), 3 B. & C. 421 ; 5 Dowl. & R. 290 487, 552, 744 

Skeet V. Lindsay (1877), 46 L. J. Ex. 249 ; 2 Ex. D. 314 ; 36 L. T. 98 ; 

25 W. E. 322 711 

Skelton v. Cole (1857), 4 De G. & J. 587 671, 672 

Skelton v. Hawling (1749), 1 Wils. 268 532 

Skilbeck*. Garbett (1845), 7 Q. B. 846; 14L. J. Q. B. 3:j8; 9 Jur. 939. . 155, 158 
Skinner v. Great North. Ry. Co. (1874), 43 L. J. Ex. 150 ; L. R. 9 Ex. 

298 ; 32 Ij, T. 223 ; 23 W. R. 7 1186 

Skinner «. Lond. & Bright. Ry. Co. (1850), 5 Ex. 787 ; 15 Jur. 299 163 

SHpworth V. Green (1725), 8 kod. 311 ; 1 Str. 610 92 

Skrine v. Gordon (1875), Ir. R. 9 C. L. 479 49 

Skusej;. Davis (1839), 10 A. &E. 635; 2P. &D. 550; 7 Dowl. 774 ; 8 L. J. 

M. C. 75 1073 

Skyring v. Greenwood (1825), 4 B. & C. 281 ; 6 Dowl. & R. 401 ; 1 C. & 

P. 517 542 

Slack V. Buohannan (1790), Pea. R. 5 516 

Slack V. Busteed (18.i6), 6 Ir. Ch. R. 1 694 

Slade V. Tucker (1880), 14 Ch. D. 824 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 644 ; 43 L. T. 49 ; 

28 W. R. 807 595 

Slane Peerage (1855), Pari. Min. Pt. 2, p. 49 ; 5 CI. & Fin. 41 422 

Slaney v. Wade (1836). 1 My. & C. 338 ; 7 Sim. 595 . . . .409, 416, 423, 424, 425 

Slater v. Hodgson (1846), 9 Q. B. 727 : 2 New Seas. Cas. 488 430 

Slater v. Lawsou (1830), 1 B. & Ad. 396 493 

Slator V. Nolan (1876), I. E. 11 Eq. 367 137 

Slatterie ». Pooley (1840), 6 M. & W. 664 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 8 ; 1 H. & W. 

16; 4 Jur. 1038 29], 292, 486 

Slaymaker v. Gundacker's Ex. (1823), 10 Serg. & R. 75 493 

Slaymaker v. Wilson (1829), 1 Penrose & Watts, 216 1220 

Sleght V. Rhinelacder (1806), 1 Johns. 192 765 

Slingabyi;. Grainger (1859), 7 H. L. Caa. 283; 28 L. J. Ch. 616 741, 801 

Sly V. Sly (1877), L. R. 2 P. D. 91 ; 46 L. J. P. D. & A. 63 444, 445 

SmaU V. Nairne (1849), 13 Q. B. 840 355 

Smallcombe v. Bruges (1824), M'Cl. 45 ; 13 Price, 136 498 

Smart v. Harding (1855), 15 C. B. 652 ; 24 L. J. C. P. 76 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 

311 682 

Smart V. Hyde (1841), 8 M. & W. 723 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 60 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 

479 769 

Smart v. Morton (1855), 5 E. & B. 30 ; 24 L. J. Q. B. 260 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 

825 114 

Smart v. Rayner (1834), 6 C. & P. 721 271 

Smart v. West Ham Union (1855), 10 Ex. 867 ; 3 C. L. R. 696 ; 24 L. J. 

Ex. 201 641 

Smartle ». Williams (1695), 3 Lev. 387 ; 1 Salk. 280 1214 

Smee v. Bryer (1848), 6 Moo. P. C. C. 604 ; 6 Notes of Cas. (Eoo. & Mar.) 

406 698 

Smee v. Smee (1879), 6 P. Div. 84 ; 49 L. J. P. 8 ; 28 W. R. 703 ; 44 J. 

P. 220 262, 263 

Smith's Estate, Re, Bridson v. Smith (1876), 24 W. R. 392 534 

Smith, Re, OsweU v. Shepherd, (1892) 67 L. T. 64 134 

Smith and Goddard v. Ridgway (1866), 2 H. & C. 37 ; 4 H. & C. 577 ; 35 

L. J. Ex. 198 ; L. R. 1 Ex. 331 803 

Smith, Knight & Co., Re (1869), L. R. 4 Ch. 421 ; 38 L. J. Ch. 710 845 

Smith, Marv, case of (1616), 2 How. St. Tr. 1049 657 

Smith V. Adkins (1872), L. R. 14 Eq. 402 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 628 693 

Vol. I, ends with page 635. 



clxxxyiii table op cases cited. 

PAOB 

Smith V. Andrews, (1891) 2 Ch. 678 ; 65 L. T. 175 76, 1173 

Smith V. Battams (1857), 26 L. J. Ex. 232 92 

Smiths). Battens (1834), 1 M. & Rob, 341 146, 461 

Smith V. Beadnell (1807), 1 Camp. 30 617 

Smith V. Dk. of Beaufort (1842), 1 Hare, 520; 13 L. J. Ch. 33; 1 Phill. 209.. 1183 

Smith V. Biggs (1832), 5 Sim. 391 ; 2 L. J. Ch. 161 482 

Smith V. Bird (1839), 3 Dowl. 641 476 

Smith V. Blakey (1867), 8 B. & 8. 164 ; L. K. 2 Q. B. 326 ; 36 L. J. Q. B. 

156 ; 15 W. R. 492 : 436, 437, 455 

Smith V. Blaudy (1829), Ry. & M. 259 4 79 

Smith V. Brain (1851), 16 Q. B. 244 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 201 ; 15 Jur. 287 262 

Smith V. Braudram (1841), 2 M. & Gr. 250 ; 2 Soott, N. R. 539 ; 9 Dowl. 

441 ; 5 Jur. 173 194 

Smith«).Brownlow,Ld.(1869),L.R.9Eq. 241; 21L.T.739 ; 18 W. R. 271 396 
Smith V. BuUer (1875), L. R. 19 Eq. 473 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 69 ; 31 L. T. 873 ; 

23 W. R. 332 818 

Smith V. Bumham (1838), 3 Sumn. 438 556 

Smithu. Cannan (1854), 2E. & B. 35; 22 L. J. Q. B. 291 ; 17 Jur. 911.. 82 

Smith V. Cartwright (1851), 6 Ex. 927 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 401 148 

Smith V. Chester (1787), 1 T. R. 654 ; 1 E. R. 345 547, 548 

Smith V. Conder (1878), 47 L. J. Ch. 878 ; 9 Ch. D. 1 70 , 27 W. R. 149 . . 785 
Smith <). Cramer (1836), 1 Bing. N. C, 686; 1 Scott, 541; 1 Hodges, 124.. 377, 381 

Smith V. Crooker (1809), 5 Mass. 538 1196 

Smith V. Daniell (1876), 44 L. J. Ch. 189 ; L. R. 18 Eq. 649 ; 30 L. T. 752.. 699 

Smith V. Daviea (1836), 7 C. & P. 307 259 

Smith V. Be Wmitz (1825), Ry. & M. 212 612 

Smith V. Doe d. Jersey (1819), 2 B. & P. 592 ; 1 B. & B. 97, 160 39 

Smith V. Dunham (1829), 8 Pick. 246 1201 

Smith V. East India Co. (1841), 1 PhiU. 50 618 

Smith V. Evans (1851), 1 Wils. 313 700 

Smith p. Fell (1841), 2 Curt. 667 600 

Smith V. Flanders (1880), 129 Mass. 322 741 

Smith V. Forty (1829), 4 C. & P. 126 716 

Smith V. Harris (1846), 1 Roberts. 262 700 

Smith «. Hayes (1867), I. R. 1 C. L. 333 523 

Smith V. Henderson (1842), 9 M. & "W. 798 ; 11 L. J. Ex. 316 ; 2 Dowl. 

N. S. 245 1217, 1218 

Smith V. Howden (1863), 2 New R. 30 ; 14 C. B. N. S. 398 113 

Smith V. Hudson (1865), 34 L. J. Q. B. 145 ; 6 B. & S. 431 ; 12 L. T. 377; 

13 W. R. 683 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 622 692 

Smith V. Hughes (1871), L. R, 6 Q. B. 597 ; 40 L. J. Q. B. 221 ; 26 L. T. 

329 ; 19 W. R. 1069 776 

Smith V. Huson (1811), 1 PhilUmore, 294 373 

Smith V. James (1861), 11 C. B. N. S. 62 ; 5 L. T. 525 ; 10 W. R. 131 . . 726 

Smith V. Jeffries (1821), 9 Price, 267 267 

Smith «). Jeffryes (1846), 15 M. & W. 561 ; 15 L. J. Ex. 325 783 

Smith V. Johnson (1812), 16 East, 213 ; 13 R. R. 449 1124 

Smith V. Keal (1882), 9 Q. B. D. 340 ; 47 L. T. 142 ; 31 W. R. 76 390 

Smith V. Keating (1849), 6 C. B. 136 86 

Smith V. King, (1892) 2 Q, B. 543 ; 67 L. T. 420 ; 40 W. R. 542 ; 66 

J. P. 776 718 

Smith V. Knowelden (1841), 2 M. & Gr. 561 ; 9 Dowl. 402 ; 10 L. J. C. P. 

126 187, 188 

Smith V. Lane (1824), 12 Serg, & R. 84 927 

Smithu. Lister (1895), 15 R. (Mar.), 416; 64 L.J. Q. B. 154; 72L.T. 20 .. 1061 
Smith?!. Lloyd (1854), 9 Ex. 662, 574; 2 C. L. R. 1008; 23 L. J. Ex. 

194 118 

Smith V. LoTell (1850), 10 C. B. 6; 1 L. M. & P. 794 ; 20 L. J. C. P. 57 ; 

15 Jur. 250 202 

Smith V. Lyon (1813), 3 Camp. 465 ; 14 R. E. 810 496 

Smith V. Maplebaok (1786), 1 T. R. 441 ; 1 R. R. 247 • 666 

Smith V. Marrable (1842), C. & Marsh. 479 ; 11 M. & W. 6 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 

223 273, 77S 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. clxxXlX 

PiOE 

Smith V. Marsack (1818), 6 0. B. 486 ; 6 Dowl. & L. 363 ; 18 L. J. C. P. 

65 ; 12 Jur. 1050 547 

Smith V. Martin (1841), C. & Marsh. 68 ; 9 M. & W. 304 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 

418 261 

Smith V. Matthews (1861), 30 L. J. Ch. 445 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 378 ; 4 L. T. 266; 

9 W. R. 644 665 

Smith V. Morgan (1839), 2 M. & Rob. 257 496, 923, 925 

Smith ». Mullett (1809) 2 Camp. 208 ; 11 R. R. 694 31 

Smith V. Neale (1857), 2 0. B. N. S. 67 ; 26 L. J. C. P. 143 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 

516 675, 680, 778 

Smith V. NicoUs (1839), 6 Bing. N. 0. 222; 7 Scott, 147; 7 Dowl. 282; 

1 Am. 474 1142, 1152, 1165 

Smith V. Poole (1841), 12 Sim. 17 ; 10 L. J. Ch. 192 713 

Smith V. Royston (1841), 8 M. & "W. 386 ; 1 Dowl. N. S. 124 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 

437 1121 

Smithy. Rnmmens (1807), 1 Camp. 9 1102, 1109, 1116 

Smith V. Sainsbury (1832), 5 C. & P. 196 1222 

Smith V. Soudder (1824), 11 Serg. & R. 325 504 

Smith V. Shaw (1829), 10 B. & C. 277 ; 5 M. & R. 226 227 

Smith V. Simmes (1795), 1 Esp. 330 614 

Smith V. Sleap (1843), 1 C. & K. 48 310 

Smith V. Smith (1733-4), 2 Str. 955 638 

Smith V. Smith (Huson) (1 81 1), 1 Phillimore, 294 373 

Smith V. Smith (1836), 3 Bing. N. C. 29 ; 7 C. & P. 401 610 

Smith ». Smith (1866), 36 L. J. P. & M. 65 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 143 ; 14 L. T. 

147 ; 14 W. R. 648 695, 697 

Smith V. Smith (1876), I. R. 10 Eq. 273 304, 419 

Smith V. Surman (1829), 9 B. & C. 561 ; 4 M. & R. 45.5 . . 686, 687, 689, 690, 691 

Smith V. Surridge (1801), 4 Esp. 26 ; 6 R. R. 837 1143 

Smith «. Taylor (1805), 1 Bos. & P. N. R. 196 151, 519 

Smith V. Tebbitt (1867), L. R. 1 P. & D. 398, 434; 36 L. J. P. 97 ; 16 L.T. 

841; 16W. E. 18 170, 416, 423 

Smith V. Thackeray (1866), L. R. 1 C. P. 564 ; 35 L. J. C. P. 276 ; 12 Jur. 

N. S. 64-') ; 14 L. T. 761 ; 14 "W. R. 832 114 

Smith V. Thomas (1836), 2 Bing. N. C. 380 ; 1 Hodges, 366 , 4 Dowl. P. C. 

333 207 

Smith »." Thompson '(isio),' Sc! B.'ii' ;" ISL. J.' C.'p. Hi '. '. .'. '.'. '.'.'.'.'.'. '. '. 44 
Smith D. Thorne(1862),21 L. J. Q. B. 199; 18 Q. B. 134; 16 Jur. 332. .710, 712 

Smith V. Tombs (1839), 3 Jur. 72 682 

Smith V. Truaoott (1843), 1 Dowl. & L. 630; 6 M. & Gr. 267; 12 L. J. 

C. P. 336 832 

Smith V. Voss (1867), 2 H. & N. 97 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 233 6 

Smith V. Webster (1876), 45 L. J. Ch. 528 ; 3 Ch. D. 49 ; 35 L. T. 44 ; 24 

"W. R. 894 667 

Smith 11. Whittingham (1833), 6 C. & P. 78 436, 508 

Smith V. WiUdns (1833), 6 C. & P. 180 231 

Smith V. "Wilson (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 729 764, 765 

Smith V. Winter (1882), 12 C. B. 487 ; 21 L. J. C. P. 168 ; 16 Jur. 908 . . 222 

Smith V. Young (1808), 1 Camp. 439 293 

Smithson's, Sir Hugh, oise (undated), cited Bull. N. P. 2^8 10 8 

Smyth V. Anderson (1849), 7 C. B. 21 ; 18 L. J. C. P. 109 ; 13 Jur. 211. .222, 

460 

Smyth V. Wilson (1841), 2 Jebb & Sy. 660 89, 92 

Smythe v. Banks (1797), 4 Dall. 329 866 

Snelgrove v. Martin (1822), 2 M'C. 241 511 

Snell V. Finch (1863), 32 L. J. C. P. 117 ; 13 C. B. N. S. 661 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 

333 ; 7 L. T. 747 162 

Snelling v. Huntingfield (1834), 1 C. M. & R. 20 ; 4 Tyr. 606 : 4 L. J. 

Ex. 232 68 1 

Snowball ». Goodricke (1833), 4 B. & Ad. 641 496 

Snowdon v. Smith (1811), cited 1 M. & Sel. 286 255 

Soar V. Foster (1758, should be 1858), 4 K. & J. 152 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 406 . , 066 
Society, &o. *. Wheeler (1814), 1 New Hamp. 310 122 

Vol- 1, ends with page 63d. 



CXC TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOB 

Solicitor, In re, A (1880), 14 Ct. D. 162 834 

Solicitor to the Treasury v. White (1886), 55 L. J. P. 79 1282 

Solly V. Hinde (1834), 2 C. & M. 516 ; 4 Tyr. 305 748 

Solomon, Re, Ex parte Dressier (1878), 9 Ch. D. 252; 48 L. J. Bank. 20; 

39 L. T. 377 662 

Solomon V. Vintners' Co. (1859), 4 H. & N. 685 ; 28 L. J. Ex. 370 ; 6 Jur. 

N. S. 1177 115 

Solomons v. CampbeU (1822), cited 1 St. Ev. 177 924 

Solway, The (1885), 10 P. D. 137 ; 64 L. J. P. 83 ; 53 L. T. 680 ; 34 W. E,. 

232 ; 6 Asp. M. C. 482 388 

Somerset, D. of, v. Fogwell (1826), 6 B. & C. 876 ; 1 D. & R. 747 Ill 

Somerset, D. of, t>. France (1727), 1 Str. 662 232 

Somersets. Hart (1884), 12 Q.B.D. 360; 63 L. J. M. C. 77; 48 J. P. 327. . 107 
Somervme v. Hawkins (1-861), 10 C. B. 583 ; 20 L. J. C. P. 131 ; 15 Jur. 

460 46, 111 

Somerville v. Somerville (1801), 5 Ves. 750 ; 5 R. R. 155 179 

Somes V. Skinner (1826), 3 Pick. 52 90 

Soper V. Dibble (1696), 1 Ld. Raym. 175 6 

Sopwith 1). Sopwith (1861), 30 L. J. P. & M. 131 ; 2 S. & T. 160 ; 7 Jur. 

N. S. 554 ; 4 L. T. 256 1110 

Sbtheran v. Dening (1881), 20 Ch. D. 99 706 

Sotiliohos V. Kemp (1848), 3 Ex. 105 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 36 766 

Souch*. Strawbridge (1846),2C.B. 814; 15 L. J. C. P. 170; lOJur.367.. 681, 

682 

Soule's case (1828), 5 Greenl. 407 893 

Souter V. Drake (1834), 2 B. & Ad. 992 ; 3 N. &.M. 40 773 

South-Eastem Ry. Co. v. "Warton (1862), 31 L. J. Ex. 615 ; 6 H. & N. 520 94 
South of Ireland ColHery Co. v. Waddle (1869), L. R. 4 C. P. 618 ; 38 

L. J. C. P. 338 640, 641 

Southall V. Rigg (1851), 11 C. B. 481 ; 20 L. J. C. P. 145 ; 16 Jur. 706 . . 201 

Southampton case (1833), Cock. cSc R. 113 ; Per. & K. 225 '. 496 

Southampton Dock Co. v. Richards (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 448 ; 1 Scott, N. R. 

219 1177 

Southampton, Mayor of, v. Graves (1800), 8 T. R. 590 ; 6 R. R. 480 993 

Southard v. Wrexford (1826), 6 Cowen, 254 962 

Southee*. Denny (1847), 1 Ex. 196; 17 L. J. Ex. 15i 189 

Southey v. Nash (1837), 7 C. & P. 632 917 

Southwark Bridge Co. v. Sills (1826), 2 C. & P. 371 643 

Southwark Water Co. v. Quick (1878), 3 Q. B. D. 315 ; 47 L. J. Q. B. 

288; 26 W. R. 341 595, 1186 

Southwell D. Bowditch (1876), 1 C. P. D. 100, 374 ; 46 L. J. C. P. 630 ; 

34 L. T. 133 ; 35 L. T. 196 ; 24 W. R. 275, 838 769 

Southwick V. Southwick (1870), 2 Sweeney, 234 689 

Soward V. Leggatt (1836), 7 C. & P. 616 258, 269 

Sowerby v. Butcher (1834), 2 C. & M. 371 ; 4 Tyr. 320 768 

Spaddacini v. Keary (1889), 21 L. R. Jr. 553 914 

Spadwell V. (1730), cited Berkeley Peerage, 4 Camp. 410 419 

Spaight V. Tedcastle (1881), 6 App. Cas. 217 ; 44 L. T. 589 ; 29 W. R. 

761 ; 4 Asp. M. C. 406 178 

Spaight V. Twiss (1868), 13 Ir. C. L. R. 416 1168 

Spargo V. Brown (1829), 9 B. & C. 935 435, 487 

Sparrow v. Farrant (1819), 2 St. Bv. 517, n 1227 

Sparrowv. Hill (1881), 7 Q. B. D. 362; 8Q. B. D.'479; 60 L. J. Q. B. 

675; 44L. T. 917; 29 W. R. 705 42 

Spartali v. Beneoke (1850), 10 C. B. 212 ; 19 L. J. C. P. 293 766, 769 

Spears v. Hartly (1837), 3 Esp. 81 ; 6 R. R. 814 79 

Spence v. Dodsworth (1891), 60 L. J. Ch. 768 ; (1891) 1 Ch. 657 ; 64 L. T. 

282 ; 39 W. R. 362 9U 

Spence D. Healey (1863), 8 Ex. 668; 22 L. J. Ex. 249 750 

Spence v. Stewart (1802), 3 East, 89 ; 6 R. R. 549 869 

Spenceley, In the goods of , (1892) P. 256 ; 61 L. J. P. 133 1104 

Spenoeley v. De Willott (1806), 7 East, 108 ; 3 Smith, 289 947 

Spenceley v. Schulenburgh (1806), 7 East, 367 607, 608 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE or CASES CITED. CXCl 

PAQB 

Spencer ». Barough (1842), 911. &'W.426; 6 Jur. 154; 11 L.J. Ex. 378..475,476 

Spencer v. Billing (1812), 3 Camp. 310 323 

Spencer v. Newton (1837), 6 A. & E. 623 ; 1 N. & P. 818 ; 1 Jur. 52 . .867, 868 

Silencer v. Thompson (1856), 6 Ir. C. L. R. 537, 565 158, 243, 1 111 

Spencer v. Williams (1871), L. R. 2 P. & D. 230 ; 40 L. J. P. & M. 45 ; 

24L. T. 513; 19 W. K. 703 1106 

Sperling, Re (1864), 33 L. J. P. & M. 25 ; 9 L. T. N. S. 348 ; 12 "W. R. 

354 ; 3 S. & T. 272 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 1205 700 

Spice V. Bacon (1877), 2 Ex. D. 463 ; 46 L. J. Ex. 713 ; 36 L. T. 896 ; 25 

W. R. 840 : 162 

Spicer v. Burgess (1834), 1 C. M. & R. 129 ; 4 Tyr. 598 1203 

Spioer v. Cooper (1841), 1 Q. B. 424 ; 1 a. & D. 52 ; 5 Jur. 1036 763 

Spickernell v. Hotham (1854), 1 Kay, 669 671 

Spieres v. Parker (1 786), 1 T. R. 141 ; 1 R. R. 165 85 

Spiers i). "Willison (1808), 4 Crancli, 398 288 

Spill V. Manle (1869), L. R. 4 Ex. 232 ; 38 L. J. Ex. 138 ; 20 L. T. 675 ; 

17 W. R. 805 Ill 

Spindler, Re, see Bx parte Rolfe. 

Spittle V. "Walton (1851), L. R. 11 Eq. 420 ; 40 L. J. Ch. 368 ; 24 L. T. 

18 ; 19 W. R. 405 896 

SpoUan ». Magan (1851), 1 Ir. C. L. R. 700 710,713 

Spong V. Wright (1842), 9 M. & W. 629 ; 12 L. J. Ex. 144 712, 713 

Spooner v. Juddow (1848-50), 6 Moo. P. C. R. 257 19, 225, 227 

Spooner v. Payne (1847), 4 C. B. 328 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 225 328, 1214, 1216 

Spragge's case (undated), cited 14 East, 276 318 

Spratt V. Harris (1833), 4 Hagg. Eco. 405 1151 

Sprigge V. Sprigge (1868), 38 L. J. P. & M. 4 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 608 ; 19 

L. T. 462 ; 17 W. R. 8 143 

Spring, The (1866), L. R. 1 Adm. 99 ; 14 W. R. 975 6 

Spring V. Eve (1677\ 2 Mod. 240 20 

Spring V. Lovett (1831), 11 Pick. 417 757 

Spurr V. Trimble (1818), 1 A. K. Marsh. 271 172 

Squire v. Campbell (1836), 2 Cooper, 114 750 

Srimut Rajah v. Katama Natohiar (1866), 11 Moo. lud. App. 50 1123 

Staoe V. Griffith (1869), 6 Moo. P. C. N. S. 18 ; L. R. 2 P. C. 420 ; 20 L. T. 

197 47, 618, 619 

Stackpole v. Arnold (1814), 11 Mass. 27 552, 744, 758 

Stackpole ». Howell (1807), 13 Ves. 417 ; 9 R. R. 200 144 

Staokpoole v. The Queen (1875), I. R. 9 Eq. 619 398 

Stafford's, Ld., case (1680), 7 How. St. Tr. 1459-. 624, 973, 974 

Stafford Peer. (1825), Pari. Min. 4 413, 416, 423 

Stafford ». Clark (1824), 2 Bing. 382 ; 9 Moore, C. P. 724 ; 1 C. & P. 24, 

403 1124 

Stafford, Mayor of, v. Till (1829), 4 Bing. 75 ; 12 Moore, 260 97, 643 

Staines v. Stewart (1862), 31 L. J. P. & M. 10 ; 2 S. & T. 320 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 

440 705, 747, 950 

Stainton v. Chadwiok (1851), 3 M. & G. 575 ; 13 Beav. 320 ; 15 Jur. 1539. . 1183 

Stainton and Wife v. Jones (1779), 1 Doug. 380, n. 96 7 

Stalworth v. Inns (1844), 13 M. & W. 466 ; 2 Dowl. & L. 428 ; 14 L. J. 

Ex. 81 ; 9 Jur. 285 1039 

Stamford Bank ». Smith, (1892) 1 Q. B. 765 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 405 ; 66 L. T. 

306; 40 W. R. 355; 56 J. P. 229 713 

Stamford, Ld. v. Dunbar (1846), 13 M. & W. 822, 827 119 

Stammers ». Dixon (1806), 7 East, 200 ; 3 Smith, 261 ; 8 R. R. 612 791 

StancUff V. Hardwicke (1836), 2 C. M. & R. 1, 12 ; 3 Dowl. P. C. 762 ; 6 

Tyr. 551 ; 1 Gale, 127 152 

Standage v. Creighton (1832), 6 C. & P. 406 606 

Standard v. Baker (1785-6), cited Tidd's Prao. 858 836 

Standen v. Chrismas (1847), 10 Q. B. 135 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 265 ; 11 Jur. 694 1169 
Standen v. Standen (1791), Pea. R. 45 ; 4 T. R. 469, n. ; 6 T. R. 331, n. .436, 621 

Standish v. Ross (1849), 3 Ex. 527 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 186 549 

Standley, Re (1849), 1 Roberts. 755 ; 7 Notes of Cas. (Eco. & Mar.) 69 . . 698 
Stanger v. Searle (1793), 1 Esp. 16 1221 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CXCll TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAGE 

Stanhope «>. Nott (undated), 2 Swans. 221, n 609 

Stanley v. Dowdeswell (1874), L. R. 10 C. P. 102 ; 23 W. R. 389 672 

Stanley J). Stanley (1862), 2 J. & H. 491 ; 10 W. R. 857 Sd 

Stanley v. White (1811), 14 Bast, 338 ; 12 R. B. S44 232, 234, 523 

StansBeld v. Hobsou (1852), 16 Beav. 236 ; 3 De G. M. & G. 620 ; 22 L. J. 

Ch. 457 ; 20 L. T. 301 ; 1 "W. R. 216 720 

Stantone. Collier (1854), 3E. &B.274; 23L. J.Q.B. 116; 18 Jnr.N.S. 650.. 664 

Stanton i>. Peroival (1854), o H. L. Cas. 257 ; 24 L. J. Oh. 369 492 

Stanton v. Styles (1850), 1 L. M. & P. 575 ; 5 Ex. 678 ; 19 L. J. Ex. 336. . 1121 
Stanwix's, Gen., case (see R. v. Hay, Dr.). 

Stapleton v. Crofts (1852), 18 Q. B. 367 ; 21 L. J. Q. B. 246 . . . .879, 887, 892 
Stapleton v. Haymen (1865), 33 L. J. Ex. 170 ; 2 H. & C. 918 ; 12 W. R. 

317; 10 Jur. iST. S. 417 651 

Stapylton v. Clough (1853), 2 E. & B. 933 ; 2 C. L. R. 266 ; 23 L. J. Q. B. 

5 ; 18 Jur. 60 437, 454, 460 

Startup V. Maodonald (1841), 2M:. & Gr. 395 ; 2 Soott, N. R. 485 ; (1843), 

6M. & Gr. 619; 7 Scott, N. R. 269; 12 L. J. 0. P. 477 33, 34 

State, The, v. Adams (1789-1806), 1 Hayw. 463 120 

State, The, v. Atkinson (1894), 42 Am. St. R. 877 Aiid. [68] 

State, The, v. Boswell (1829), 2 Dev. 209 972, 973 

State, The, v. Buie (1876), 43 Tex. 532 627 

State, The, v. Center (1862), 35 Vern. 378 690 

State, The, v. Clifford (1892), 42 Am. St. R. 518 Jdd. [68, 580] 

State, The, v. De "Wolf (1830), 8 Conn. 93 897 

State, The, v. Freeman (1824), 5 Conn. 348 617 

State, The, v. Hayward (1819), 1 Nott & M'C. 547 627 

State, The, v. Held (1874), 57 Mo. 252 627 

State, The, v. Johnson (1893), 40 Am. St. R. 405 Add. [468] 

State, The, v. McKean (1873), 36 Iowa, 349 635 

State, The, v. Molier (1826-34), 1 Dpt. 263 627 

State, The, v. Rawls (1820), 2 Nott & M'C. 331 528 

State, The, v. Stinson (1844), 7 Law Reporter, 383 169, 903 

State, The, v. Whisenhurst (1823), 2 Hawks. 458 906 

State, The, v. Wood (1873), 53 New Hamp. 484 616 

Stattuck V. The State (1858), 11 Ind. 473 616 

Staverton v. Ashburton (1855), 4 E. & B. 526 ; 24 L. J. M. C. 53 ; 1 Jur. 

N. S. 233 1136 

Stead V. Dawher (1839), 10 A. & E. 57 ; 2 P. & D. 447 752 

Stead V. Heaton (1792), 4 T. R. 669 440, 441 

Steadman v. Dnhamel (1845), 1 C. B. 892 ; 14 L. J. C. P. 270 546 

Steamship Co. "Norden" t>.Dempsey (1876), 45 L. J. C. P. 764 ; 1 C. P. D. 

654 ; 24 W. R. 984 158, 763 

Stearine, &o. Co. v. Heintzmann (1864), 17 C. B. N. S. 60 ; 11 L. T. 272 ; 

10 Jur. N. S. 881 937 

Stearn i;. Mills (1833), 4 B. & Ad. 657 ; 1 N. & M. 434 553 

Stebbing v. Spicer (1849), 8 C. B. 827 ; 19 L. J. C. P. 24 168 

Stedman v. Gooch (1793), 1 Esp. 6 103.t 

Steel V. Prickett (1819), 2 Stark. R. 463 112, 397, 402 

Steel V. State Line Steamship Co. (1877), 3 App. Caa. 72 ; 37 L. T. 333 . . 771 
Steele, Re, May v. Wilson (1868), 37 L. J. P. & M. 68 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 

575 ; 19 L. T. 91 ; 17 W. R. 16 709 

Steele i;. Howe (1849), 14 Q. B. 431; 19 L. J. Q. B. 89 ; 14 Jur. 147 .. . . 787 

Steele v. Mart (1825), 4 B. & C. 273 756 

Steele v. Stewart (1843-4), 1 Phill. 471 ; 14 L. J. Ch. 34 ; 9 Jur. 121 .... 699 

Steevens's Hosp. v. Dyas (186.3), 15 Ir. Ch. B. 405, 420 142 

Steiglitz V. Egginton (1815), Holt, N. P. R. 141 ; 17 R. R. 622 645 

Steinkeller v. Newton (1840), 1 Soott, N. R. 148 ; 8 Dowl. 579 ; 9 C. & P. 

313 325, 355, 356, 923 

Stephen v. Gwenap (1831), 1 M. & Rob. 120 4'j5 

Stephens v. Foster (1833), 6 C. & P. 289 928 

Stephens v. Heathcote (1860), 1 Dr. & Sm. 138 ; 29 L. J. Ch. 529 496 

Stephens v. Pinney (1818), 8 Taun. 327 ; 2 Moore, C. P. 349 287 

Stephens (should be Stevens) v. Webb (1835), 7 C. & P. 60 274 

The references are to pages, not to paragrap/is. 



TABLE OP CASES CITED. CXCIU 

PAGH 

Steuart v. Gladstone (1878), 7 Oh. D. 394 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 154 ; 37 L. T. 575 ; 

26 W. E. 277 487 

Stevens v. Clark (1842), 2 M. & Eob. 435 481 

Stevens v. Lloyd (1829), 1 M. & M. 292 1195 

Stevens v. Midi. Ey. Co. and Lauder (1854), 23 L. J. Ex. 328 ; 10 Ex. 352 ; 

2 C. L. E. 1300 ; 18 Jur. 932 643 

Stevens v. Thaoker (1793), Pea. E. 187 499 

Steward v. Eddowes (1874), 43 L. J. C. P. 204 ; L. E. 9 C. P. 311 ; 30 

L. T. 333 ; 22 W. E. 634 668 

■ Steward v. North Metropolitan Tram Co. (1886), 16 Q. B. X>. 656 ; 55 L. J. 

Q. B. 157; 64L. T. 35; 34 W. E. 316; 60 J. P. 324 191, 192 

Stewart, Ee (1863), 3 S. & T. 192 ; 4 S. & T. 211 ; 32 L. J. P. & M. 94 . . 701 

Stewart v. Alison (1821), 6 Serg. & E. 324 1178 

Stewarts. Anglo-Califor. Gold Miu. Co. (1852), 18 Q. B. 736 ; 21 L. J. 

Q. B. 393 643 

Stewart v. BaUris Co. (1883), 63 L. J. Ch. 760 ; 50 L. T. 479 ; 32 W. E. 

676 347, 845 

Stewart i>. Cauty (1841), 8 M. & W. 160 ; 2 Eailway & C. Cas. 616 ; 10 

L. J. Ex. 348 37 

Stewart v. Forbes (1849), 1 H. & T. 461, 472 ; 1 Mao. & G. 137 ; 19 L. J. 

Ch. 133 160 

Stewart v. Steele (1842), 4 M. & Gr. 669 ; 5 Soott, N. E. 517 ; U L. J. 

C. P. 155 818 

Stewartson v. Watts (1839), 8 Watts, 392 388 

Steyner v. Droitwich (1696), Skin. 623 ; 1 Salk. 281 ; 12 Mod. 85 1179 

Still V. Halford (1814), 4 Camp. 19 1039 

Stimson*). Earnham (1871), 41 L. J. Q. B. 52; L. E. 7 Q. B. 175 ; 26 

L. T. 747 ; 20 W. E. 183 549 

Stoate V. Stoate (1861), 30 L. J. P. & M. 102 ; 2 S. & T. 223; 3L.T 756. . 1110 
Stobart v. Dryden (1836), 1 M. & W. 615 ; 2 Gale, 146 ; 1 T. & G. 899 ; 5 

L. J. Ex. 218 308, 446, 465 

Stobart v. Todd (1854), 23 L. J. Ch. 956 ; 2 W. E. 617 ; 2 Eq. 1144 ; 18 Jur. 

618 1036 

Stobell (should be Stokell) v. Niven (1889), 61 L. T. 18 671 

Stock V. M'Avoy (1872), L. E. 15 Eq. 85 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 230 ; 21 W. E. 

620 ; 27 L. T. 441 666 

Stookbridge v. Quicke (1853), 3 C. & K. 305 1047 

Stockdale v. Hansard (1839), 2 P. & D. 1 ; 9 A. & E. 1 ; 3 Jnr. 905 4 

Stocken v. Collin (1841), 7 M. & W. 616 ; 9 C. & P. 653 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 227. . 31, 

154 

Stockfleth V. De Tastet (1814), 4 Camp. 11 ; 15 E. R. 720 516, 517 

StockU V. Puushou (1880), 6 P. D. 9 ; 50 L. J. P. 14 ; 44 L. T. 280 ; 29 

W. E. 2:4 ; 45 J. P. 169 701 

Stockton V. iJemuth (1838), 7 Watts, 39 388 

StockweU V. Eitherdon (1848), 6 Notes of Cas. (Eoo. & Mar.) 409 705 

Stoddart v. Grant (1851-2), 1 Macq. 171 ; 1 Paterson, 122 704 

Stoddart v. Manning (1828), 2 Har. & G. 147 969 

Stoer, In re (1884), 9 P. D. 120 ; 51 L. T. 141 ; 32 W. E. 1006 362 

Stoever v. Whitman (1814), 6 Binn. 417 765 

StokehiU v. Pettingell (1852), 21 L. J. Q. B. 249, n 879 

Stokes V. Bate (1826), 6 B. & C. 491 ; 3 Dowl. & E. 247 1133 

Stokes V. Dawes (1826), 4 Mason, 268 423, 1102 

Stokes V. Grant (1878), 4 C. P. D. 25 ; 40 L. T. 36 ; 27 W. E. 397 187 

Stokes V. Heron (1845), 12 C. & E. 161 ; 9 Jui-. 563 144 

Stokes V. Mason (1808), 9 East, 426 19 

Stokes V. Salomons (1861), 9 Hare, 79 ; 20 L. J. Ch. 343 79 

Stokes ». White (1834), 1 CM. & E. 223; 4 Tyr. 786 872 

Stonard v. Dunkin (1810), 2 Camp. 344 ; 11 E. E. 724 545 

Stone's case (1661), Dyer, 215, pi. 50 660 

Stone, James, Ee (1868), 1 S. & T. 238 142 

Stone V. Blackburn (1793), 1 Esp. 37 909 

Stone V. Eorsyth (1781), 2 Doug. 707 1045 

Stone V. Greening (184»), 13 Sim. 390 804 

Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



CXCIV TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAOE 

Stone V. Metoalf (1815), 1 Stark. S3 ; 755 

Stone V. Whiting (1817), 2 Stark. R. 235 ; 19 R. R. 710 660 

Stones V. Byron (1846), 4 Dowl. & L. 393 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 32 ; 1 BaU Gt. 

K. 248 ; 11 Jut. 44 909 

Stones V. Menhem (1848), 2 Ex. 382 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 215 363 

Stoomvaart v. Peninsular and Oriental Steam Nav. Co. (1880), 5 App. Cas. 

876 ; 52 L. J. Adm. 1 ; 43 L. T. 610 ; 29 "W. R. 173 177 

Stoop's case (1799), Addis. 381 467 

Storr V. Scott (1833), 6 C. & P. 241 520 

Stothert v. James (1843), 1 C. & K. 121 512 

Stott V. Pairlaml) (1883), 53 L. J. Q. B. 47 ; 49 L. T. 525 767 

Stoveld V. Hughes (1811), 14 East, 308 ; 12 R. R. 523 691 

Stowe V. Quemer (1870), L. R. 5 Ex. 155 ; 39 L. J. Ex. 60 ; 22 L. T. 29 ; 

18 W. R. 466 26 

Stowell V. Robinson (1837), 3 Bing. N. C. 928 ; 6 L. J. C. P. 326 ; 5 Scott, 

196 752 

Stracey v. Blake (1835), 7 C. & P. 404 474 

Stracy v. Blake (1836), 1 M. & W. 168 ; Tyr. & G. 528 507 

Straffon's Exors., Ex parte, North of England Joint Stock Bank. Co., Re 

(1853), 22 L. J. Ch. 194 ; 1 De G. M. & G. 576 ; 16 Jur. 435 641 

Straker ». Graham (1839), 4 M. & W. 721 ; 8 L. J. Ex. 86 ; 7 Dowl. 223 . . 617 
Straker v. Reynolds (1889), 22 Q. B. D. 262; 58 L. J. Q. B. 180; 60 

L. T. 107 ; 37 W. R. 379 855 

Stranks v. St. John (1867), 36 L. J. C. P. 118 ; L. R. 2 C.P. 376 . . . .649, 773 

Stratford v. Greene (1810), 1 Ball & B. 296 1013, 1014 

Stratford and Morton Rail. Co. v. Stratton (1832), 2 B. & Ad. 618 91 

Stratton v. Rastall (1788), ,2 T. R. 366 93, 552, 744 

Strauss v. County Hotel Co. (1883), 12 Q. B. D. 27 ; 53 L. J. Q. B. 25 ; 

49 L. T. 601 ; 32 "W. R. 170 162 

Strauss 1). Francis (1866), L. R. 1 Q. B. 379 ; 36 L. J. Q. B. 133 ; 7 B. & 

S. 365 508 

Streathley, In the goods of, (1891) P. 172 ; 60 L. J. P. 56 ; 39 W. R. 

432 700 

Streeter v. Bartlett (1848), 5 C. B. 562 ; 17 L. J. C. P. 140 1044, 1210 

Stringer v. Gardiner (1859), 27 Beav. 35 ; 4 De G. & J. 468 ; 28 L. J. Ch. 

758 799, 800 

Strode v. Russel (1708), 2 Vem. 621 789, 794 

Strong V. Dickenson (1836), 1 M. & W. 490 ; 2 Gale, 83 ; 6 Dowl. 99 ; 1 

T. & G. 683 ; 5 L. J. Ex. 231 866, 867 

Strong V. Foster (1855), 25 L. J. C. P. 106 ; 17 C. B. 201 758 

StronghiU v. Buck (1850), 14 Q. B. 787 ; 14 Jur. 741 94 

Strother v. Barr (1828), 2 M. & P. 207 ; 5 Bing. 136 277, 280, 286, 288 

Stroud, Re (1849), 8 C. B. 518 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 117 1160 

Strutt V. Bovingdon (1803), 5 Esp. 66 ; 8 R. R. 834 324, 353, 1114 

Stuart V. BaJkis Co. (1883), 53 L. J. Ch. 790 ; 60 L. T. 479 ; 32 W. R. 

676 347, 846 

Stuart V. LoveU (1817), 2 Stark. R. 94 ; 19 R. R. 688 219, 245 

Stuoley V. Baily (1862), 31 L. J. Ex. 483 ; 1 H. & C. 405 ; 10 "W. R. 

720 757 

Studdy V. Sanders (1823), 2 Dowl. & R. 347 561, 610 

Stukeley i). Butler (1615), Hob. 171 800 

Sturge V. Buchanan (1839), 2 P. & D. 573 ; 10 A. & E. 698 ; 2 M. & Rob. 

90 316, 483, 485, 976 

Sturgeon v. Wingfield (1846), 16 M. & "W. 224 ; 15 L. J. Ex. 212 96 

Sturla V. Frecoia (1879), 12 Ch. D. 411 ; 6 App. Cas. 623 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 

86 ; 43 L. T. 209 ; 29 "W. R. 217 ; 44 J. P. 812 458, 1092, 1167, 1174 

Sturm V. JefEree (1847), 2 C. & K. 442 314 

Sturt V. Blagg (1847), 10 Q. B. 906, 908 46 

SufEell V. Bank of England (1882), 9 Q. B. D. 656 ; 51 L. J. Q. B. 401 , 

47 L. T. 146; SOW. R. 932; 46 J. P. 500 1194, 1195 

Suffield V. Brown (1864), 3 New R. 343, 344 ; 33 L. J. Ch. 259 ; 4 De G. 

J. & S. 185 115 

Suffolk Witches (1666), 6 How. St. Tr. 647 ; 667 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLB OF CASES CITED. CXCV 

PAGB 

Sugden v. Lord St. Leonards (1876), 45 L. J. P. D. & A. 1 ; 1 P. Div. 

154 ; -34 L. T. 369 ; 24 W. R. 479 143, 307, 356, 790 

Sugg V. Bray (1885), 54 L. J. Gh. 132 ; 61 L. T. 194 314 

Suisse V. Lowther (1843), 2 Hare, 424; 12 L. J. Ch. 315 806, 808 

Sullivan v. Galbraith (1870), 4 Ir. Eq. 582 144 

Sullivan v. Sullivan (1870), Ir. R. 4 Eq. 457 789 

Summers, Be (1850), 7 Notes of Gas. (Ecol. & Mar.), 562; 2 Roberts. 

295 697 

Summers v. Griffiths (1866), 35 ^Beav. 27 137 

Summers (should be Simmons) v. London Joint Stock Bank, (1891) 1 Ch. 

270 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 313 ; 62 L. T. 427 : 63 L. T. 789 ; 39 W. R. 449 ; 

(1892) A. G. 201 ; 61 L. J. Gh. 723 ; 66 L. T. 626 ; 41 W. R. 108 ; 66 

J. P. 644 390 

Summers v. Moorhouse (1884), 13 Q. B. D. 388 ; 63 L. J. Q. B. 564 ; 51 

L. T. 290 ; 32 W. R. 826 ; 48 J. P. 424 756 

Sunmaers i>. Moseley (1834), 2 C. & M. 477 ; 4 Tyr. 168 ; 3 L. J. Ex. 128. . 942 

Summersett v. Adamson (1822), 1 Bing. 73 293 

Sumner v. Williams (Dudley v. Sumner) (1809), 5 Mass. 444 372 

Sunderland, Re (1866), 35 L. J. P. & M. 82 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 198 ; 14 

L. T. 741 ; 14 W. R. 971 701 

Sunderland's, Hodgson's, Kirkwood's, and Martin's cases (1830), 1 Lew. 

C. G. 102 246 

Snroome ». Pinniger (1853), 3 De G. M. & G. 571 ; 22 L J. Gh. 419 ; 17 

Jur. 196 679 

SurpUoe v. Famsworth (1844), 7 M. & Gr. 576 ; 8 Soott, N. R. 306 ; 13 

L. J. 0. P. 215 774 

Suse V. Pompe (1860), 8 0. B. N. S. 538 ; 30 L. J. C. P. 75 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 

166 ; 9 W. R. 15 781 

Sussex Peerage case (1844), 11 Gl. & Fin. 114—117 ; 8 Jur. 793 7, 51, 411, 

422, 434, 435, 436, 437, 467, 936, 937, 938 

Suter V. BurreU (1857), 2 H. & N. 867 ; 27 L. J. Ex. 193 311 

Sutton V. Ainslie (1852), 1 Maoq. 299 ; 1 Paterson, 72 348 

Sutton V. Buck (1810), 2 Taunt. 302 ; 11 R. R. 685 116, 117 

Sutton V. Gioeri (1890), 15 App. Gas. 144 ; 62 L. T. 742 742 

Sutton V. Devouport (1858), 27 L. J. C. P. 54 109, 520 

Sutton V. Gregory (1797), Peake, Ad. C. 160 ; 4 R. R. 899 454 

Sutton V. Johnstone (1787), 1 T. R. 493, 784 ; 1 Br. P. G. 76 ; 1 R. R. 257 . . 30 
Sutton V. Sadler (1857), 26 L. J. C. P. 284 ; 3 C. B. N. S. 87 .... 169, 170, 262 
Sutton V. Sutton (1882), 22 Ch. D. 611 ; 62 L. J. Ch. 338 ; 48 L. T. 98 ; 

31'W. R. 372 721 

Sutton V. Tatham (1839), 10 A. & B. 27 ; 2 P. & D. 308 ; 8 L. J. Q. B. 

210 '. 158 

Sutton V. Temple (1843), 12 M. & W. 64 ; 30 L. J. Ex. 17 774, 775, 776, 777 

Swain v. Lewis (1835), 2 C. M. & R. 261 ; 5 Tyr. 998 317 

Swan V. N. Brit. Austral. Co. (1863), 2 H. & C. 175 ; 32 L. J. Ex. 273 ; 2 

New R. 521 ; 11 W. R. 862 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 102 641, 1205 

Swan's case (1870), L. R. 10 Eq. 675 ; 18 "W. R. 447 843 

Swann v. PhilHps (1838), 8 A. & E. 457 ; 3 N. & P. 1017 ; 22 L. T. 854 . . 719 

Swanne v. TaafEe (1845), 8 Ir. L. R. 101 ■. 817 

Swansea Bk. v. Thomas (1879), 48 L. J. Ex. 344 ; 4 Ex. D. 94 ; 40 L. T. 

558 ; 27 W. R. 491 139 

Swansea V. Ry. Co. v. Budd (1866), L. R. 2 Eq. 274 ; 35 L. J. Gh. 631 ; 

14 "W. R. 663 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 661 1189 

Swatmau v. Ambler (1862), 8 Ex. 72 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 81 675 

Sweeney v^ Spooner (1863), 32 L. J. M. C. 82 ; 3 B. & S. 329 ; 7 L. T. 623; 

IIW. R. 264; 9 Jur. N. S. 691 894 

Sweeny v. Promoter Life Ass. Go. (1863), 14 Ir. G. L. R. 476 638, 639 

Sweet V. Lee (1841), 3 M. & Gr. 452 673, 675, 783, 784 

Sweeting v. Fowler (1815), 1 Stark. R. 106 168, 217 

Sweeting v. Pearce (1861), 7 G. B. N. S. 449 ; 9 C. B. N. S. 634 ; 30 L. J. 

C. P. 109 ; 6 L. T. 79 ; 9 W. R. 343 158 

Sweetland v. Sweetland (1865), 4 S. & T. 6 ; 24 L. J. P. 42 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 

182; UL. T. 749; 13 W. R. 604 699 

Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



CXCVl TABLE OF CASES CITED, 

PAGE 

Sweigart v. Berk (1822), 8 Serg. & R. 305 1139 

Swift V. Dean (1810), 6 Johns. 523 910 

Swift V. Eyres (1636), Oro. Car. 548 802 

Swift V. Jewesbury (1874), 43 L. J. Q. B. .50 ; L. R. 9 Q. B. 301 ; 43 L. J. 

Q. B. 56 ; 30 L. T. 31 ; 22 W. E. yi9 718 

Swift V. M'Tieman (1848), 11 Ir. Eq. R. 602 487, 1050, 1054, 1168, 1173 

Swift V. Pannell (1883), 24 Ch. D. 210 ; 48 L. T. 3.01 ; 31 "W. R. 543 731 

Swift V. Swift (1832), 4 Hagg. (Eco.) 154 961, 962 

Swift V. "Winterbotham (1873), 42 L. J. Q. B. Ill ; L. R. 8 Q. B. 244 718 

Swiney *. Barry (1835), Jones, 109 1199 

Swinfenj>. Ld. Chelmsford (1860), 6H. &N. 890; 29 L. J. Ex. 382; 6 Jur. 

N. S. 1036; 2L. T. 406; 8 "W. R. 545 201, 508 

Swinfen ». Swinfen (1857), 25 L. J. C. P. 303 ; 26 L. J. C. P. 97; 1 C. B. 

N. S. 364 ; 3 Jur. N. S 85 507 

Swinnerton v. Stafford, M. of (1810), 3 Taun. 91 430, 1050 

Swire v. Francis (1877), 3 App. Cas. 106 ; 47 L. J. P. C. 18 ; 37 L. T. 554 586 
Sybrav v. White (1836), 1 M. & "W. 435; Tyr. & Gr. 746 ; 2 Gale, 68 ; 5 

L. j. Ex. 173 499 

Sydenham v. Rand (1784), 3 Doug. 429 814 

Syers v. Jonas (1848), 2 Ex. Ill 768 

Sykes, Re (1873), 42 L. J. P. & M. 17 ; L. B. 3 P. & D. 26 ; 28 L. T. 142; 

21 W. E. 416 142 

Sykes v. Dixon (1839), 9 A. & E. 693 ; 1 P. & D. 463; 1 W. "W. & H. 120. 669 

Sykes v. Dunbar (1800), 2 Selw. N. P. 1081 616 

Sylph, The (1843-4), 2 Notes of Cas. (Ecc. & Mar.) 86 1122 

Sylvester v. Hall (1825), Ry. & M. 255, n 272 

Symplons v. Blake (1835), 1 M. & Rob. 477 244 

Symonda v. Gaslight and Coke Co. (1848), 11 Beav. 283 526 

Symonds v. Lloyd (1859), 6 C. B. N. S. 691 764 

Symons v. Eees (1876), 1 Ex. D. 416 1118 

T. V. D. (falsely called D.) (1866), L. R. 1 P. & D. 127 128 

Talbot, Ld. v. Cusaek (1864), 17 Ir. C. L. E. 213 924, 925 

Talbot V. Hodgson (1816), 7 Taun. 251 ; 2 Marsh. 527 134 

Talbot V. Hodson (1816), 7 Taun. 251 ; 2 Marsh. 527 1209 

Talbot V. Lewis (1834), 1 C. M. & R. 495 ; 5 Tyr. 1 398 

Talbot V. Seeman (1801), 1 Cranch. 1 1093 

Talbutt V. Clark (1840), 2 M. & Rob. 312 245 

Tamvaco v. Lucas (1862), 1 B. & S. 185 ; 3 B. & S. 89 ; 30 L. J. Q. B. 234; 

31 L. J. Q. B. 296 ; 4 L. T. 400 ; 6 L. T. 697 ; 10 "W. E. 733 ; 7 Jur. 

N. S. 1100 42 

Tanored v. Delagoa Bay Ey. Co. (1889), 23 Q. B. D. 239 ; 58 L. J. Q. B. 

549 ; 61 L. T. 229 ; 38 W. E. 15 651 

Tanham v. Nicholson (1872), L. E. 5 H. L, 561 ; I. R. 6 C. L. 188 158 

Tann v. Tann (1863), 2 New R. 412 ~ 802 

Tannery. Smart (1827), 6 B. & C. 609; 9 D. & R. 549 710, 712, 714 

Tanner v. Taylor (1756), cited 3 T. E. 754 924 

Taplin v. Atty (1825), 3 Bing. 164 ; 10 Moore (C. P.), 564 311 

Taplin v. Florence (1851), 10 C. B. 744 ; 20 L. J. C. P. 137 ; 15 Jur. 402. 638 
TapHng v. Jones (1865), 11 H. L. Cas. 290 ; 20 C. B. N. S. 166 ; 34 L. J. 

C. P. 342 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 309 ; 12 L. T. 555 ; 13 W. E. 617 76 

Tapp V. Lee (1803), 3 B. & P. 371 82 

Tarleton v. Shingler (1849), 7 C. B. 812 1203 

Tarletonj). Tarleton (1815), 4 M. & Sel. 20 1142, 1164, 1155 

Tarlton i). Fisher (1781), 2 Doug. 671 872 

Tarpley v. Blabey (1836), 2 Bing. N. C. 437 ; 2 Scott, 642 ; 7 C. & P. 395 ; 

Hodges, 414 245 

Tarte v. Darby (1846), 15 M. & W. 601 ; 15 L. J. Ex. 326 658 

Tatham v. Drummond (1864), 33 L. J. Ch. 438 ; 2 H. & M. 262 805 

Tattersall v. Fearnley (1856), 17 C. B. 368 282 

Tattershall v. Nat. Steamship Co. (1884), 12 Q. B. D. 297 ; 53 L. J. Q. B. 

332 ; 50 L. T. 299 ; 32 W. R. 566 ; 5 Asp. M. C. 206 771 

The references are to pa^es, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXCVll 

PAQE 

Tatton, Ex parte, Re Thorp (1881), 17 Ch. D. 512 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 792 ; 45 

L. T. 89 848 

Tayler v. Waters (1817), 7 Taun. 374 : 2 Marsh. 551 ; 18 R. E. 499 638 

Tayleur v. Wildin (1868), L. B,. 3 Ex. 303 ; 37 L. J. Ex. 173 ; 18 L. T. 

656; 16W. R. 1018 623 

Tayloe ». Riggs (1828), 1 Pet. 591 277 

Taylor, Ex parte (1820), IJac. & W. 483 1047 

Taylor, Re (1842), 9 Paige, 611 373 

Taylor, Re (1851), 2 Roberts. 711 ■ 699 

Taylor, Re, Cloak d. Hammond (1887), 34 Ch. D. 265 ; 66 L. J Ch. 171 ; 

66 L. T. 649 ; 36 "W. R. 186 793 

Taylor, In goods of (1890), 63 L. T. 230 705 

Taylor v. Barclay (1828), 2 Sim. 213 ; 7 L. J. Ch. (0. S.) 65 3, 18, 21 

Taylor v. Beech (1749), 1 Ves. sen. 297 679, 680 

Taylor v. Blaoklow (1836), 3 Bing. N. C. 235 ; 3 Scott, 614 ; 2 Hodges, 

224 600 

Taylor v. Bowers (1877), 46 L. J. Q. B. 39 ; 1 Q, B. D. 291 ; 34 L. T. 

938 ; 24 W. R. 499 91 

Taylor D.Briggs (1827), 2 C. & P. 625 ; M. & M. 28 763 

Taylor v. Burgess (1859), 5 H. & N. 1 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 7 768 

Taylor v. Carpenter (1846), 2 Woodb. & M. 5 324 

Taylor v. Clemson (1844), 2 Q. B. 1031 ; 3 Railw. Cas. 65 ; 2 G. & D. 346 ; 

11 CI. & Fin. 610 : 8 Jur. 833 10>8, 1137 

Taylor>«). Cole (1799), 7 T. R. 3, n. ; 4 R. R. 363 424, 1158 

Taylor v. Cook (1820), 8 Price, 652 1226, 1227 

Taylor v. Croker (1803), 4 Esp. 187 647 

Taylor v. Devey (1837), 7 A. & E. 409 ; 2 N. & P. 469 ; W. W. & D. 646 ; 

1 Jur. 892 401 

Taylor v. Diplook (1815), 2 Phillim. 261 , 174 

Taylor v. Forster (1825), 2 C. & P. 195 506, 599 

Taylor ■„. Gt. Ind. Pen. Ry. Co. (1859), 4 De G. & J. 669 ; 28 L. J. Ch. 

709 1205 

Taylor v. Hawkms (1851), 16 Q. B. 308 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 313; 15 Jur. 

746 46,111 

Taylor v. Horde (1757), 1 Burr. 107 133 

Taylor v. Hughes (1844), 2 Jones & La T. 24 541 

Taylor v. Humphries (1864), 17 C. B. N. S. 539 ; 34 L. J. M. C. 1 ; 10 

Jur. N. S. 1153 ; 11 L. T. 376 ; 13 W. R. 136 263 

Taylor v. Johnston (1882), 51 L. J. Ch. 879 ; 19 Ch. D. 403 ; 46 L. T. 219 ; 

30 W. R. 608 137 

Taylor v. Kinlooh (1816), 1 Stark. R. 176 , 147, 498 

Taylor v. Lawson (1828), 3 C. & P. 543 919 

Taylor v. Linley (1860), 2 De G. E. & J. 84 ; 29 L. J. Ch. 534 ; 8 W. R. 

735 683 

Taylor v. Meads (1865), 34 L. J. Ch. 203 ; 4 De G. J. & S. 697 ; 13 W. R. 

394 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 166 693 

Taylor v. Mosely (1833), 6 C. & P. 273 1193, 1194 

Taylor v. Needham (1811), 2 Taun. 278 ; 11 R. R. 572 8«, 97 

Taylor v. NichoUs (1840), 6 M. c& W. 95 ; 8 Do-wl. 242 ; 9 L. J. Ex. 78. .732, 733 

Taylor v. Parry (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 604 ; 1 Scott, N. R. 576 234, 803, 1092 

Taylor v. Richardson (1853), 2 Drew. 16 76 

Taylor v. Ross (1832), 3 Terger, 330 669 

Taylor v. Smith (1892), 61 L. J. Q. B. 331 ; 67 L. T. 39 ; 40 W. R. 486. . 672 
Taylor v. Stray (1867), 2 C. B. N. S. 176, 197 ; 26 L. J. C. P. 287 ; 3 Jur. 

N. S. 964 168 

Taylor v. Wakefield (1866), 6 E. & B. 766 690 

Taylor v. Weld (1809), 6 Mass. 116 746 

Taylor ». WiUans (WiUiame) (1830-31), 4 M. & P. 69 ; 2 B. & Aid. 845 . . 372, 

606, 832 

Taylor v. Witham (1876), 3 Ch. D. 605 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 798 438 

Teal V. Auty (1820), 2 B. & B. 99 ; 4 Moore (C. P.), 542 687 

Temperley v. Scott (1832), 8 Bing. 392 ; 1 M. & So. 601 818, 1036 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CXCVlll TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAQB 

Tempest, Ex parte, Re Cra-ren (1870), 40 L. J. Bank. 22 ; L. R. 6 Oh. 70 ; 

23 L. T. 650 ; 19 W. R. 137 82 

Tempest v. Fitzgerald (1820), 3 B. & Aid. 680 689 

Tempest v. Kilner (1845), 2 C. B. 300 ; 15 L. J. 0. P. 101 ; 3 Dowl. & L. 

407 201, 685 

Temple, Ex parte (1814), 2 Ves. & B. 395 866, 869 

Temple v. PuUen (1853), 8 Ex. 389 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 151 38, 1205 

Tennant, Ex parte, Re Howard (1877), 6 Ch. D. 303 ; 37 L. T. 284; 25 

W. R. 854 159 

Tennant v. Bell (1846), 9 Q. B. 684 ; 16 L. J. M. C. 31 ; 10 Jur. 946 . .37, 1004 
Tennant v. Creston (Overton) (1846), 2 New Ssss. Gas. 425 ; 8 Q. B. 707 ; 

15 L. J. M. 0. 105 ; 10 Jur. 660 1004 

Tennant v. Hamilton (1839), 7 01. & Fin. 122 ; MoL. & R. 821 947 

Tennent v. Neil (1870), I. R. 5 C. L. 418 128 

Tennyson v. O'Brien (1855), 5 E. & B. 497 189 

Terrett t). Taylor (1815). 9 Cranoli, 43 90 

Terry v. Huntington (1669), Hardr. 480 1103 

Terry v. Hutchinson (1868), 37 L. J. Q. B. 257 ; 9 B. & S. 487 ; L. R. 3 

Q. B. 599 ; 18 L. T. 521 ; 16 "W. R. 932 253 

Texira v. Evans (undated), cited 1 Anst. 228 ; 2 H. Bl. 140 ; 4 T. R. 320 ; 

2 R. R. 399 1205 

Thames Iron Works Co. v. The Royal Mail St. Packet Co. (1862), 13 C. B. 

N. S. 3.58 ; 31 L. J. C. P. 169 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 100 750 

Thanet, E. of ». Forster (1683), T. Jones, 224 1167 

Tharpe v. Giehume (1825), 2 C. & P. 21 1221 

Tharpe v. Stallwood (1843), 5 M. & Or. 768 ; 6 Scott, N. R. 715 ; 12 L. J. 

C. P. 241 ; 1 Dowl. & L. 24 ; 7 Jur. 492 227 

Thatcher v. Waller (1675), T. Jones, 53 340 

Thelluson v. Cosling (1803), 4 Esp. 266 1093 

Theobald v. Crichmore (1818), 1 B. & Aid. 227 227 

Theodor Komer, The (1878), 3 P. Div. 162 ; 47 L. J. Adm. 85 ; 38 L. T. 

818 ; 27 W. R. 307 1186 

Thetford v. Tyler (1845), 8 Q. B. 95 ; 15 L. J. Q. B. 33 ; 10 Jur. 68 ... . 169 

Thetford'scase (1719), 12 Vin. Abr. 90, pi. 16 1050, 1176 

Thin V. Richards (1892), 2 Q. B. 141 ; 62 L. J. Q. B. 39 ; 66 L. T. 327 ; 

56 J. P. 696 770 

Thom V. Bigland (1853), 8 Ex. 726 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 243 201 

Thomas, In the goods of (1871), 41 L. J. P. & M. 32 ; 26 L. T. 609 ; 20 

W. R. 149 439 

Thomas, Re (1859), 1 S. & T. 255 ; 28 L. J. Prob. 33 698 

Thomas Blyth, The (1860), Lush. Adm. 16 177 

Thomas v. Ansley (18fi6), 6 Esp. 80 84, 283 

Thomas v. Brown (1876), 1 Q. B. D. 714 ; 46 L. J. Q. B. 811 ; 35 L. T. 

237; 24 W. E. 821 538, 671 

Thomas v. Churton (1862), 2 B. & S. 475 ; 31 L. J. Q. B. 139 ; 8 Jur. 

N. S. 795; 6L. T. 320 869 

Thomas v. ConneU (1838), 4 M. & W. 267 ; 1 H. & H. 189 ; 7 L. J. Ex. 

306 379 

Thomas v. Cook (1818), 2 Stark. (N. P.) 408 ; 2 B. & A. 119 ; 20 R. R. 

374 128, 660, 661 

Thomas ». Cooke (1828), 8 B. & C. 728 ; 3 M. & Ry. 444 678, 679 

Thomas v. David (1836), 7 C. & P. 350 918, 950 

Thomas v. Evans (1802), 2 East, 488 705 

Thomas v. Foyle (1803), 6 Esp. 88 116 

Thomas v. Fredericks (1847), 10 Q. B. 775 ; 16 L. J. Q. B. 393 ; 11 Jur. 

942 638 

Thomas v. Jenkins (1837), 6 A. & E. 626 ; 1 N. & P. 587 ; 1 Jur. 261. .396, 398 

Thomas v. Ketteriohe (1749), 1 Ves. sen. 333 1106 

Thomas v. Lewis (1878), 4 Ex. D. 18 ; 48 L. J. Ex. 7 ; 39 L. T. 669 ; 27 

W. R. Ill 178 

Thomas v. Morgan (1835), 2 C. M. & R. 496 ; 4 Dowl. 223 ; 1 Gale, 172 ; 

5 Tyr. 1085 615 

Thomas v. Newton (1826), M. & M. 48, n 969 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CXCIX 

FAOB 

Thomas v. Packer (18S7), 1 H. & N. 669 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 207 ; 3 Jur. N. S. 

143 169 

Thomas v. Eawlings (1859), 27 Beav. 140 597, 698 

Thomas v. SorreU (undated), Vaugh. 351 638 

Thomas v. Stephenson (1853), 2 E. & B. 108 ; 22 L. J. Q. B. 258 ; 17 Jur. 

897 227 

Thomas v. Thomas (1796), 6 T. E. 671 ; 3 R. B,. 306 794, 799 

Thomas v. Thomas (1811), 2 Camp. 647 524 

Thomas v. Thomas (I860), 2 Dr. & Sm. 298 173 

Thomas v. Williams (1830), 10 B. & C. 664 678 

Thompson, Ex parte (1845), 6 Q. B. 721 998 

Thompson, Goods of. Be (1887), 12 P. D. 100; 56 L. J. P. D. & A. 40; 57 

L. T. 373 ; 35 W. E,. 384 413 

Thompson4).Bowyer(1863),2NewB. 504; 11W.II.975; 9 Jur.N. S. 863. . 720 

Thompson v. Donaldson (1800), 3 Esp. 63 ; 6 R. K. 812 1104 

Thompsons. Falk (1852), 1 Drew. 21 601 

Thompson v. Gardiner (1876), 1 C. P. D. 777 297 

Thompson«i.Gibson(1841),8M.&W.285; lOL. J.Ex. 241; 9Dowl.717.. 1073 

Thompson v. Hopper (1856), 25 L. J. Q. B. 240 ; 6 B. & B. 172 771 

Thompson v. Laoy (1820), 3 B. & Aid. 283 162 

Thompson v. Lambe (1802), 7 Ves. 588 482 

Thompson v. Mosely (1833), 5 C. & P. 502 231, 321 

Thompson v. Nye (1850), 16 Q. B. 175 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 85 ; 15 Jur. 285. . 256 
Thompson v. Boss (1858), 29 L. J. Ex. 1 ; 6 H. & N. 16 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 

1133; IL. T. 43 253 

Thompson v. Small (1845), 1 C. B. 328 ; 14 L. J. C. P. 157 152 

Thompson v. Trail (1826), 2 C. & P. 334 ; 6 B. & C. 36 ; 9 D. & R. 31 . . 162 

Thompson v. Trevanion (1694), Skin. 402 377 

Thompson v. Waithman (1856), 3 Drew. 628 ; 26 L. J. Ch. 134 490 

Thomson v. Austen (1823), 2 Dowl. & By. 361 479, 514 

Thomson v. Davenport (1829), 9 B. & C. 78 ; 4 M. & E,. 110 620 

Thomson v. Hall (1852), 2 Robertson, 426 697 

Thomson v. Harding (1853), 2 E. & B. 630 ; 22 L. J. Q. B. 448 510 

Thomson v. Hempenstall (1849), 7 Notes of Cas. (Ecc. & Mar.) 141 ; 1 

Roberts. 783 798 

Thomson v. Wilson (1818), 2 Stark. 379 666 

Thoringtou v. Smith (1868), 8 Wall. (U. S.) 1 763 

Thomdike v. City of Boston (1840), 1 Meto. 242 377 

Thome v. Jackson (1846), 3 C. B. 661 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 87 ; 4 Dowl. & L. 

478 17 

Thome v. Tilbury (1858), 27 L. J. Ex. 407 ; 3 H. & N. 534 545 

Thomes. v. White (1835), Tyr. & Gr. 110 531 

Thornhill v. ThornhiU (1820), 2 Jao. & W. 347 814 

Thomton v. Charles (1836), 2 M. & W. 809 298 

Thornton v. Kempster (1814), 5 Taun. 786 ; 1 Marsh. 355 ; 15 R. R. 658 . .297, 

299 

Thornton v. Meux (1827), M. & M. 43 297 

Thornton v. Place (1832), 1 M. & Rob. 218 1122 

Thornton v. Roy. Ex. Ass. Co. (1791). Pea. R. 25 935 

Thorp, Re, Ex parte Tatton (1881), 17 Ch. D. 512 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 792 ; 45 

L. T. 89 848 

Thorp V. Holdsworth (1876), 45 L. J. Ch. 406 ; 3'Ch. D. 637 224 

Thorpe v. Cooper (1828), 5 Bing. 129 ; 2 M. & P. 246 ; 2 Y. & J. 445 ... . 1123 

Thorpe v. Macaulay (1820), 5 Madd. 229 961 

Thresh v. Rake (1794), 1 Esp. 63 762 

Thunder v. Warren (1845), 8 Ir. Law R. 181 286 

Thurbaine et al. (1664), Hardr. 323 543 

Thurle v. Madison (1655), Sty. 462 1214 

Thurston v. Slatford (1700), 1 Salk. 284, 285 357 

Thurtell's case (undated), cited 8 C. & P. 284 889 

Thurtell v. Beaumont (1823), 8 Moore, C. P. 612 ; 1 Bins. 339 105 

Thwaites v. Foreman (1844), 1 Coll. 409, 414 ; 10 Jur. 483 144 

Thwaites v. Richardson (1790), Pea. R. 16 ; 3 R. R. 645 488 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CC TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOH 

Thwaites v. WUding (1883), 12 Q. B. D. 4; 53 L. J. Q. B. 1 ; 49 L. T. 

396 ; 32 "W. B. 80 723 

Thynne, Lady B., v. Ld. Qlengall (1847-81, 2 H. L. Oas. 131 679, 806 

Tichbome case (1871-2), MS. 28th Feb. 1872 55, 608 

Tickel V. Short (1750), 2 Ves. sen. 239 525 

TicHe V. Brown (1836), 4 A. & E. 378 ; 6 N. & M. 230 ; 1 H. & "W. 769 . .446, 

610 
Tidey v. MoUett (1864), 16 C. B. N. S. 298 ; 33 L. J. C. P. 235 ; 10 L. T. 

380 ; 12 W. E. 802 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 800 649 

Tidmarsh v. Grover (1813), 1 M. & Sel. 735 ; 14 E.. K. 563 1194 

Tiemey v. Wood (1854), 19 Beav. 330 ; 23 L. J. Oh. 895 ; 2 W. R. 577 . . 665 

Tighe V. Tighe (1877), I. E. 11 Eq. 203 1151 

Tildesley v. Harper (1876-78), 7 Ch. D. 403 ; 10 Ch. D. 393 ; 48 L. J. Ch. 

495 ; 39 L. T. 552 ; 27 W. E. 249 186, 188, 221, 224 

Tiley «. Cowling (1701), 1 Ld. Raym. 744 1117 

Tilghman v. Fisher (1840), 9 "Watts, 441 620 

Tillotson, Ex parte (1816), 1 Stark. 470 871 

Timson v. Wilson (1888), 38 Ch. D. 72 ; 69 L. T. 76 ; 36 W. E. 418 .... 22 

TindaU v. Baskett (1861), 2 P. & P. 664 270 

Tinley v. Porter (1837), 6 Dowl. 744 ; 2 M. & W. 822 832 

Tinn v. BiUingsley (1835), 2 0. M. & R. 253 ; 3 Dowl. 810 474 

Tippet's case (E. v. Tippet) (1823), E. & E. 509 660 

Tippets V. Heane (1834), 1 C. M. & R. 252 ; 4 Tyr. 772 714 

Tippius V. Coates (1847), 6 Hare, 16 971 

Tirzah, The (1878), 48 L. J. P. D. & A. 15 ; 4 P. D. 33 177 

TisdaU v. PameU (1863), 14 Ir. C. L. E. 1, 27, 28 433, 1167, 1168 

Titus Gates' case (1685), 10 How. St. Tr. 1185 877 

Tobacco-pipe Makers' Co. v. Loder (1851), 14 Q. B. 765 ; 20 L. J. Q. B. 

414 ; 15 Jur. 1194 71 

Toby V. Lovibond (1848), 5 C. B. 784 ; 5 Dowl. & L. 769 ; 17 L. J. C. P. 

201; 12 Jur. 436 1160 

Tod V. E. of Winohelsea (1828), 3 C. & P. 387 141, 284, S53 

Todd V. Kerrich (1852), 8 Ex. 151 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 1 ; 17 Jur. 119 36, 153 

Todd V. Eeid (1821), 4 B. & Aid. 210 158 

Todd V. Winohelsea, Ld. (1826), 2 C. & P. 488 ; M. & M. 12 141 

Toft V. Stephenson (1851), 1 De G. M. & G. 28 ; 21 L. J. Ch. 129 ; 15 Jur. 

1187 720 

Toker v. Toker (1863), 31 Beav. 629 ; 3 De G. & Sm. 487 ; 8 L. T. 525, 

777 ; 32 L. J. Ch. 322 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 370 137 

Toleman v. Portbury (1869), 39 L. J. Q. B. 136 ; L. E. 5 Q. B. 288 ; 22 

L. T. 33 ; 18 W. E. 579 260, 522 

Toleman, Ee, Ex parte Bramble (1880), 13 Ch. D. 885 ; 42 L. T. 413 ; 28 

W. E. 676 321 

ToUemaohe, Ee, Anderson, Ex parte (1885), 14 Q. B. D. 606 ; 54 L. J. Q. B. 

383 ; 52 L. T. 786 1013, 1110, 1114 

Tollemache, Ee, Ex parte Edwards (1884), 14 Q. B. D. 415 435, 629 

ToUemache v. ToUemaohe (1861), 30 L. J. P. & M. 113 ; 1 S. & T. 667 . . 1144 

Tolman and TJx v. Johnstone (1860), 2 F. & P. 66 949 

Tomkins V. Att.-Gen. (1813), 1 Dow, 404 1050 

Tomkins v. Saltmarsh (1826), 14 Serg. & E. 276 378 

Tomkins v. Tomkins (1859), 1 Sw. & Tr. 168 48 

Tomkinson v. Staight (1856), 25 L. J. C. P. 85 ; 17 C. B. 697 ; 2 Jur. 354. . 690 
Tomlinson ». Gell (1837), 6 A. & E. 564 ; 1 N. & P. 588 ; W. W. & D. 229 678 

Tompson v. Williamson (1831), 7 Bligh, 432 160 

Toms V. Cuming (1865), 7 M. & Gr. 88 ; 8 Scott, N. E. 910 ; 1 Lut. Reg- 

Cas. 259; 14 L. J. C. P. .58 ; 9 Jur. 91 711,726 

Tomson V. Judge (1855), 3 Drew. 306 ; 23 L. J. Ch. 929 ; 2 Eq. E. 1141 137 

Toogood V. Spyring (1834), 1 C. M. & E. 181, 193 ; 4 Tyr. 582 Ill 

Tooker i). Smith (1857), 1 H. & N. 732 654 

Topham v. M'Gregor (1844), 1 C. & K. 320 324, 925 

Toppia V. Lomas (1855), 16 C. B. 145 ; 24 L. J. C. P. 144 682 

Topping, Ex parte, Ee Levy and Robsou (1865), 34 L J. Bank. 44 ; 12 
L. T. 787 ; 13 W. R. 1025 71,5 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CCl 

PAQK 

Tomano v. Young (1833), 6 C. & P. 8 169 

Tottenham's Estate, Ee (1869), Ir. B. 3 Eq. 528 86 

Toulmiu V. Copland (1848), 2 PhiU. 711 1117 

Toulmin v. Prioe (1800), 5 Ves. 238 308 

Tourret v. Cript)s (1879), 48 L. J. Ch. 567 ; 27 W. E. 708 675 

Tovey, In re (1878), 1 P. Div. 150 ; 45 L. J. P. 78 ; 34 L. T. 856 ; 24 

W. E 539 . . 701 

Tovey v. UndBaj (isis), I'liow, Vl 7 '.'.'.'.'.".".'.'.'.' .'.'.','.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.".'.'.".1143, 1144 
Towers v. Newton (184l), 1 Q. B. 319 ; 10 L. J. Q. B. 106 ; 9 Dowl. 576. . 871 

Town of Union v. Bermes (1882), 44 New Jersey Beports (Law), 269 508 

Towne v. CampbeU-(1847), 3 C. B. 921 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 104 35 

Towne v. Lewis (1849), 7 0. B. 608 152 

Towne v. Smith (1845), 1 Woodb. & M. 115 1151 

Townend v. Drakeford (1843), 1 0. & K. 20 297, 298, 299 

Townley v. "Watson (1844), 3 Curt. 761 ; 3 Notes of Cas. (Eoo. & M.) 17. . 707 

Townsend v. Ives (1748), 1 Wils. 216 1215 

Townsend, M. of v. Strangroom (1801), 6 Ves. 339 ; 5 E. R. 312 749, 750 

Townsend v. Weld (1811), 8 Mass. 146 759 

Townshend Peer. (1843), 10 CI. & Pin. 289 422 

Toymhee «». Brown (1849), 3 Ex. 117 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 99 75 

Tracy Peer. (1839), Min. Ev. 18 1167 

Tracy Peer. (1843), 10 CI. & Pin. 191 422, 423, 425, 931, 1226, 1228 

Trafford ». Blanc {see In re Truefort). 

Trailf. Baring(1864), 33L. J. Ch. 621; 4(JifE. 485 639 

Trasher v. Everhart (1831), 3 Gill & John. 234, 242 51 

Travers v. Blundell (1877), 6 Ch. D. 436 ; 36 L. T. 341 801 

Treacy v. Corcoran (1874), I. E. 8 C. L. 40 139 

Treeby, Ee (1875), L. E. 3 P. & D. 242 ; 44 L. J. P. & M. 44 706 

Tregany v. Fletcher (1696), 1 Ld. Eaym. 164 19 

Trelawney v. Colman (1817), 2 Stark. 193 147, 375, 376, 930 

Tremain v. Barrett (1815), 6 Taim. 88 ; 1 Marsh. 463 ; 16 E. E. 584 818 

Trench v. Doran (1887), 20 L. E. Ir. 338 746, 784 

Trent v. Hunt (1853), 9 Ex. 14 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 318 ; 17 Jur. 899 98, 162 

Tress v. Savage (1864), 23 L. J. Q. B. 339 ; 4 E. & B. 36 ; 2 C. L. E. 1316 ; 

18 Jur. 680 655 

Trevanion, Ee (1850), 2 Eoberts. 311 700 

Trevivau v. Lawrence (1704), 1 Salk. 276 ; 2 Smith, L. C. 664 89 

Trewhitt v. Lambert (1839), 10 A. & E. 470 ; 3 P. & D. 676 288 

Tribe v. Tribe (1849), 7 Notes of Cas. 132 ; 1 Eoberts. 775 695 

TrickettjJ. Tomlinson(1863), 13C. B. N. S. 663; 7L. T. 678 538 

Trimbey v. Vignier (1834), 1 Bing. N. C. 161 ; 4 M. & Scott, 695 ; 6 C. & P. 25 62 
Trimble ». HiU (1879), 6 App. Cas. 342 ; 49 L. J. P. C. 49 ; 42 L. T. 103 ; 

28 W. E. 479 620 

Trimlestown, Ld. v. Kemmis (1843), 9 CI. & Pin. 763 . .431, 435, 443, 446, 485, 

1207 

Trimmer v. Bayne (1802), 7 Ves. 518 ; 6 E. E. 173 794, 806, 806 

Trist V. Johnson (1833), 1 M. & Eob. 260 314 

Tronsoni-. Dent (1853), 8 Moo. P. C. C. 419 179 

Trotman v. Wood (1864), 16 C. B. N. S. 479 778 

Trott V. Skidmore (18t)0), 2 S. & T. 12 ; 29 L. J. P. 156 ; 8 W. E. 590 ; 

6 Jur. N. S. 760 698 

Trotter v. Maclean (1876), 13 Ch. D. 680 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 256 ; 42 L. T. 118 ; 

28 W . E. 244 158, 460 

Trowbridge v. Baker (1823), 1 Gowen, 251 518 

Trowel v. Castle (1661), 1 Keb, 22 1192 

Trowell v. Shenton (1878), 8 Ch. D. 318 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 738 ; 38 L. T. 369 ; 26 

W. E. 837 680 

Trower and Lawson's case (1872), L. E. 14 Eq. 8 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 468 845 

Truefort, In re, Trafford v. Blanc (1885), 34 W. E. 66 ; 53 L. T. 498 . . 188 

Trueman v. Loder (1840), 11 A. & E. 600 ; 3 P. & D. 567 765, 767, 781, 783 

Trulook V. Eobey (1841), 12 Sim. 402 ; 15 L. J. Ch. 343 720 

Truro, Lady, Ee (1866), 35 L. J. P. & M. 89 ; L. E. 1 P. & D. 201 ; 14 

L. T. N. S. 893 ; 14 W. E. 976 701 

Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



ecu TABLE OP CASES CITED. 

FASa 

Truslove v. Burton (1824), 9 Moore, C. P. 64 606 

Trustee Eelief Act, Ee, Higgins' Trusts (1861), 2 Giff. 562 ; 30 L. J. Ch. 

405 632 

Tucker v. Barrow (1828), 7 B. & 0. 625 ; 3 C. & P. 90 ; 1 M. & R. 518 ; 

M. & M. 137 .- 517 

Tucker v. Burrow (1865), 34 L. J. Ch. 478 ; 2 H. & M. 515 ; 13 W. R. 

771; 12 Jur. N. S. 485 666 

Tucker v. Good [see Re Bonner). 

Tucker v. Maxwell (1814), 11 Mass. 143 662 

Tuokey v. Henderson (1863), 33 Beav. 174 806 

Tuff V. Warman (1857), 2 C. B. N. S. 740 ; 26 L. J. C. P. 263 : aflfd. 6 C. 

B. N. S. 573; 27 L. J. C. P. 322; 5 Jur. N. S. 222 6 

Tufton ». Whitmore (1840), 12 A. & B. 370 ; 9 L. J. Q. B. 405 366 

Tugwell V. Hooper (1847), 10 Beav. 348 ; 16 L. J. Ch. 171 607 

Tull V. Parlett (1829), M. & M. 472 748 

Tullock V. Dunn (1826), Ry. & M. 416 492 

TunnioliflEe v. Tedd (1848), 6 C. B. 553 ; 17 L. J. M. C. 67 1073 

Tupling V. Ward (1861), 30 L. J. Ex. 222 ; 6 H. & N. 749 ; 4 L. T. 20 ; 

9 W. R. 482 964 

Tupper V. Eoulkes (1861), 30 L. J. C. P. 214 ; 9 C. B. 797 ; 3 L. T. 741 ; 

9 W. R. 349 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 709 645, 646, 1206 

Tupper V. Tupper (1855), 1 K. & J. G66 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 917 708 

Turley v. Thomas (1837), 8 C. & P. 104 6 

TurnbuU v. Janson (1878), 3 C. P. D. 264 ; 47 L. J. C. P. 384 ; 26 W. R. 

815 818 

Turner's case (1664), Kel. (J.) 30 1126 

Turner, Re (1872), L. R. 2 P. & D. 403 ; 27 L. T. 322 ; 21 W. R. 38 143 

Turner, Re, Glenisterji. Harding (1885), 29 Ch. D. 985 ; 63 L. T. 528. .421, 1170 
Turner v. Ambler (1847), 10 Q. B. 262 ; 11 L. J. Q. B. 168 ; 6 Jur. 346.. 30, 703 

Turner «). Barlow (1863), 3 F. & P. 946 16 

Turner v. Cameron's Coalbrook Steam Coal Co. (1850), 6 Ex. 932 ; 20 L. J. 

Ex. 71 98 

Turner v. Collins (1871), L. R. 7 Ch. 329 ; 41 L. J. Ch. 558 ; 25 L. T. 374 136 

Turner v. Crisp (1728), 2 Str. 827 448 

Turner v. Heyland (1879), 4 C. P. D. 432 ; 48 L. J. C. P. 535 ; 41 L. T. 

556 41 

Turner v. Mason (1845), 11 M. & W. 116 ; 2 D. & L. 898 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 

311 153 

Turner v. Pearte (1787), 1 T. R. 717 910 

Turner v. Power (1828), 7 B. & C. 625 ; M. & M. 131 285 

Turner v. Walsh (1881), 6 App. Cas. 636 ; 60 L. J. P. C. 65; 45 L. T. 60.. 124 
Tumey ». Dodwell (1854), 3 E. & B. 136 ; 2 C. L. R. 666 ; 23 L. J. Q. B. 

137 ; 18 Jur. 787 717 

Turquand v. Pearon (1879), 4 Q. B. D. 280; 48 L. J. Q. B. 341 ; 40 L. T. 

191 ; 27 W. R. 396 187, 220 

Turquand i). Knight (1836), 2 M. & W. 100 ; 2 Gale, 192 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 4. 591, 

692, 694, 595, 611 
Turquand f. Wilson (1875), 1 Ch. D. 85 ; 45 L. J. Ch. 104 ; 24 W. R. 66.. 634 
Turrill V. Crawley (1849), 13 Q. B. 197 ; 18 L. J. Q. B. 166 ; 13 Jur. 878.. 162 
Turton V. Barber (1874), L. R. 17 Eq. 329 ; 43 L. J. Ch. 468 ; 22 W. R. 

438 602 

Tussaud, Re, Tussaud v. Tussaud (1878), 47 L. J. Ch. 849 ; 9 Ch. D. 363 ; 

26 W. R. 874; 39 L. T. 113 805,806 

Tutton V. Darke (1860), 5 H. & N. 649, 660 ; 29 L. J. Ex. 271 ; 6 Jur. N. 

S. 983 ; 2 L. T. 361 15, 20 

Tweedale, Re (1874), L. R. 3P. & D. 204; 44L. J. P. 36; 31 L. T. 799. .142, 702 

Twemlow v. Oswin (1809), 2 Camp. 85 ; 11 R. R. 670 175 

Twias V. Baldwin (1832), 9 Conn. 291 201 

Twyman v. Kuowles (1863), 13 C. B. 222 ; 22 L. J. C. P. 143 ; 17 Jur. 238 277, 

288 

Twyne's case (1602), 3 Co. Rep. 80 ; 1 Smith, L. C. 1 135 

Tyerman v. Smith (1866), 25 L. J. Q. B. 359 ; 6 E. & B. 719 ; 2 Jur. N. 

S. 860 643 

The referencea are to pages, not to paragraphi. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CClll 

PAOB 

Tyers v. Rosedale and Ferry Hill Iron Co. (1876), 42 L. J. Ex. 185 ; L. E. 

8 Ex. 305 ; 29 L. T. 751 : 21 W. E. 793 752 

Tyler v. Ulmer (1815), 12 Mass. 166 1096 

Tyler v. Yates (1871), L. E. 11 Eq. 265 ; 19 W. R. 118 : 23 L. T. 447 ; 40 

L. J. Ch. 768 ; 6 L. R. Ch. 665 ; 26 L. T. 284 ; 19 W. E. 909 137 

Tyrer ». Henry (I860), 14 Moo. P. C. C. 83 ; 3 L. T. 219 185 

Tyrwhitt v. Wynne (1819), 2 B. & A. 554 235 

U., falsely oaUed J. ■«. J. (1867), L. E. 1 P. & D. 461 ; 16 "W. R. 518 ; 37 

L. J. P. & M. 7 631 

Udny V. Udny (1869). L. R. 1 H. L. (So.), 441 179 

Ulverstone Union v. Park (1889), 53 J. P. 629 621 

Underwood v. Lord Courtown (1804), 2 Sch. & Lef . 67 515 

Underwood v. Wing (1854), 19 Beav. 459 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 159 ; 24 L. J. Ch. 

293 i 174 

Ungley v. Ungley (1877), 4 Ch. D. 73 ; 5 Ch. D. 887 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 189, 

854 679 

Union Bank of London v. Lenandon (1878), 3 C. P. D. 343 ; 27 L. J. Ex. 

409 651 

Unity Jt. St. Mutual Banking Assoc, Ex parte. Re King (1858), 3 De G-. 

& J. 63 ; 27 L. J. Bank. 33 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 1257 641 

Upton V. Hume (1893), 41 Am. St. R. 863 245 

Urquhart v. Butterfield (1888), 37 Ch. D. 357 ; 67 L. J. Ch. 621 ; 57 L. T. 

780 ; 36 W. R. 376 7, 473, 507 

Urquhart v. Macpherson (1878) , 3 App. Cas. 831 746 

U.S. V. Battiste (1835), 2 Sunm. 243 25 

U.S. i>. Breed (1832), 1 Sumn. 159 764 

U.S. V. Bnford (1850), 3 Pet. 12 1178 

U.S. V. Cushman (1836), 2 Sumn. 426 1115 

U.S. V. Gibert (1818), 2 Sumn. 19, 80, 81 279 

U.S. V. Gooding (1827), 12 Wheat. 469 382 

U.S. V. Hanaway (1861), 2 Wall. Jr. 139 626 

U.S. V. Hayward (1815), 2 Gall. 485 267 

U.S. V. Lefder (1837), 11 Pet. 86 748 

U.S. V. M'Rae (1867), 37 L. J. Ch. 129 ; L. R. 3 Ch. 79 ; 16 W. R. 377 ; 

17 L. T. 428 966 

U.S. V. Moses (1827), 4 Wash. 726 614 

U.S. V. Reybum (1832), 6 Pet. 352 277 

U.S. V. Spalding (1822), 2 Mason, 478 1199 

U.S. V. Wagner (1867), 36 L. J. Ch. 634 ; L. R. 2 Ch. 685 ; 15 W. R. 

1026 ; 16 L. T. 646 3 

U.S. V. Wood (1818), 3 Wash. 440 354 

U.S. V. Wood (1840), 14 Peters, 430 628 

Ustioke V. Bawden (1824), 2 Add. 125 709 

Utterton v. Robins (1834), 1 A. & E. 423 701 

Uxbridge, Lord, v. Stavelaud (1747), 1 Ves. sen. 56 961 

Vacheb v. Cooks (1829), M. & M. 353 377, 379 

Vaoher i>. Cooks (1830), 1 B. & Ad. 147 1212 

Tail V. Rice (1851), 1 Seld. (N. Y.), 155 782 

Vaillant v. Dodemead (1792), 2 Atk. 524 595, 603, 965 

Vale V. Oppert (1875), 10 Ch. App. 340 ; 44 L. J. Ch. 579 ; 33 L. T. 41 ; 

23 W. R. 780 321 

Valentine v. Piper (1839), 22 Pick. 90 1219 

Vallanoe v. Dewar (1808), 1 Camp. 503 ; 10 R. R. 738 765, 782 

Vallee ». Dnmergue (1849), 4 Ex. 290 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 398 1147 

Valpy V. Gibson (1847), 4 0. B. 864 ; 16 L. J. C. P. 241 671 

Vance v. Lowther (1876), 46 L. J. Ex. 200 ; 1 Ex. D. 176 ; 34 L. T. 286 ; 

24 W. R. 372 1194 

Vance v. Vanoe (1871), I. R. 5 C. L. 363 523 

Vandenburgh v. Spooner (1866), L. E. 1 Ex. 316 ; 35 L. J. Ex. 201 ; 4 

H. & C. 519 ; 14 W. R. 843 671 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CCIV TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

PAOH 

Vander Donokt v. TheUusson (1849), 8 C. B. 812 ; 19 L. J. C. P. 12 938 

Vandevelde v. Lluellin (1661), 1 Keb. 220 872, 873 

Van Diemen's Land Bank v. Victoria Bank (1871), 40 L. J. P. C. 28 ; 

L. R. 3 P. C. 526 ; 19 W. R. 857 38 

Vane's, Lord, ease (1743-4), 13 East, 171, n. (a) ; 1 T. R. 697 ; 12 R. R. 

317 ; Preface, vi 893 

Van Omeron v. Dowick (1809). 2 Camp. 44 ; 11 R. R. 656 4, 20, 167, 1093 

Vanquelin v. Bouard (1863), 15 G. B. N. S. 341 ; 33 L. J. 0. P. 78 ; 9 L. T. 

582; 12 W. R. 128; 10 Jur. N. S. 566 1151, 1154 

Vaa Reimsdyk v. Kane (1813), 1 Oall. 630 386, 494, 495 

Van Sandau v. Turner (1845), 6 Q. B. 773, 786 ; 14 L. J. Q. B. 154 ; 9 Jnr. 

296 20, 533 

Van Straubenzee v. Monck (1863), 32 L. J. P. & M. 21 ; 3 S. & T. 6 .... 701 

Van Wart v. Wolley (1823), Ry. & M. 4 506 

Varioas v. French (1849), 2 0. & K. 1008 328 

Vasiev. Delaval (1785), 1 T. R. 11 616, 617 

Vater's Trusts, Re (1887) W. N. 1887, at p. 128 1171 

Vaugban's case (1696), 13 How. St. Tr. 485 ; Fost. C. L. 246 236 

Vaughan v. Hancock (1846), 3 C. B. 766 ; 16 L. J. 0. P. 1 ; 10 Jar. 

926 , 682 

Vaughan v. Martin (1796), 1 Esp. 440 925, 926 

Vaughan v. WorraU (1817), 2 Madd. 322 ; 2 Swans. 400 910 

Vaughtou V. Bradsha-w (1«60), 9 C B. N. S. 103; 30 L. J. 0. P. 93; 3 

L. T. 373 ; 9 W. R. 120 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 468 1073 

Vaux Barony (1836), Min. Ev. 67 1040 

Vaux Peerage (1824), Pari. Min. 44 423, 425 

Vaux V. Shefler (1852), 8 Moo. P. C. C. 75 1122 

Velasquez, The (1867), L. R. 1 P. C. 494 ; 1 Moo. P. C. C. 426 ; 36 L. J. 

Adra. 19 ; 4 Moo. P. C. C. (N. S.), 426 ; 16 W. R. 89 178 

Venables v. Schweitzer (1873), L. B. 16 Eq. 76 ; 42 L. J. Oh. 389 ; 28 

L. T. 462 844 

Venafra v. Johnson (1834), 1 M. & Rob. 316 '. 579 

Vent V. Paoey (1830), 4 Russ. 193 601 

Vernon, B-wens & Co., In re (1886), 32 Ch. D. 165 ; 54 L. T. 365 ; 34 

W. R. 606 665 

Verry v. Watkins (1836), 7 C. & P. 30S 254, 257, 951 

Vice V. Lady Anson (1827), M. & M. 97 ; 7 B. & C. 409 ; 1 M. & R. 113 ; 

3C. &P. 19 314 

Vickers «). Hertz (1871), L. R. 2 H. L. (Sc.) 113 116 

Victoria, The (1867), 1 Ir. R. Eq. 336 ; 37 L. J. Adm. 12 178 

Vincent ». Bp. of Sodor & Man (1851), 4 De G. & Sm. 294 ; 20 L. J. Ch. 

433 ; 15 Jur. 365 ; 5 Ex. 683 693 

Vincent v. Cole (1828), M. & M. 258 ; 3 0. & P. 481 280, 286, 287 

Vines v. Arnold (1849), 8 C. B. 638 1124 

Viney v. Barss (1795), 1 Esp. 293 231 

Vinnioombe «;. Butler (1865), 34 L. J. P. & M. 18 ; 3 S. & T. 580 ; 10 Jur. 

N. S. 1109 ; 13 W. R. 392 697, 698 

Violett V. Patton (1809), 5 Cranoh, 142 ; 669 

Viret V. Viret (1880), 50 L. J. Ch. 69 ; 43 L. T. 493 _ 680 

Vivian v. Little (1883), 11 Q. B. D. 370 ; 52 L. J. Q. B. 771 ; 48 L. T. 

793; 31 W. R. 891; 47 J. P. 566 1111 

Volant V. Soyer (1853), 13 C. B. 231 ; 22 L. J. C. P. 83 321, 598 

Von Stentz v. Comyn (1848), 12 Ir. E. R. 622, 642—645 140 

Vooght V. Winch (1832), 2 B. & Aid. 662 89 

Vowles V. Toung (1806), 13 Ves. 147 ; 9 R. R. 154 413, 415, 416, 424, 425 

VuUiamy v. Huskisson (1838),, 3 T. & C. Ex. 82 ; 2 Jur. 6)6 418, 423 

Waddel, Ex parte, In re Lutscher (1877), 6 Ch. D. 328 ; 36 L. T. 345 ; 26 

W. R. 9 848 

Waddington v. Bristow (1801), 2 B. & P. 452 686 

Wade V. Nazer (1848), 6 Notes of Cas. (Eco. & Mar.) 46 705 

Wade V. Simeon (1846), 2 C. B. 342 910 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CCV 

PAGE 

Wade V. Tatton (1856), 25 L. J. C P. 240 ; 18 0. B. 371 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 491 . . 719 
Wadeer v. East India Co. (1856), 8 De Or. M. & G. 182 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 407. 618 

Wadley v. BayUss (1814), 5 Taun. 752 ; 15 Rev. R. 645 791 

Wadsworth v. Bentley (1854), 23 L. J. Q. B. 3 ; 1 L. & M. (BaU Court), 

203 ; 17 Jur. 1077 1122 

Wadsworth v. Hamshaw (1819), 2 B. & B. 6, n 693 

Wadsworth v. Marshall (1832), 1 C. & M. 87 ; 3 Tyr. 228 816 

WagstafE v. WUson (1832), 4 B. & Ad. 339 ; 1 N. & M. 1 606 

Wain «). Bailey (1839), 10 A. & E. 616 ; 2 P. & D. 507 308 

Wainman v. Kynman (1847), 1 Ex. 118 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 232 715 

Waithman v. Wakefield (1807), 1 Camp. 120 ; 10 R. E. 654 166 

Waithman v. Weaver (1822), D. & R. N. P. 10 ; 11 Price, 257 255 

Wakefield v. D. of Buccleuch (1866), L. R. 4 Eq. 613 ; 36 L. J. Ch. 763. . 114 

Wakefield v. Ross (1827), 5 Mason, 18 ; 9 Dane, Abr. 317 903 

Wakeman v. West (1836), 7 C. & P. 479 1168 

Wakley v. Johnson (1826), R. & M. 422 246 

Waloot v. AUeyn (1819), Milw. Eoo. R. (Ir.) 69 170 

Waloott J). Amerioan Life, &o. Soo. (1891), 33 Am. St. E. 923 Add. [105] 

Waloott V. Hall (1810), 6 Mass. 514 255 

Waldridge v. Kennison (1794), 1 Esp. 144 515 

Waldrons. Coombe (1810), 3Taun. 162; 12 R. R. 629 1178 

Waldron v. Jacob (1871), I. R. 5 Eq. 131 673 

Waldron v. Tuttle (1828), 4 New Hamp. 371 413 

Waldron v. Ward (1654), Sty. 449 603 

Waldy V. Gray (1875), L. R. 20 Eq. 238 ; 44 L. J. Ch. 394 ; 32 L. T. 531 ; 

23 W. R. 676 357 

Walford v. Fleetwood (1845), 14 M. & W. 449 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 271 19 

Walker's case (1586), 3 Co. Rep. 23 509 

Walker's case (1788), 1 Lea. 498 905 

Walker, In re. In re Jackson (1885), 53 L. T. 660 ; 3i W. R. 95 621 

Walker v. Bartlett (1856), 18 0. B. 845 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 643 ; 25 L. J. C. P. 

263 684 

Walker v. Beauchamp, Lady (1834), 6 C. & P. 552 . . .' 303, 409 

Walker v. Bradford Old Bk. (1884), 12 Q. B. D. 511 ; 53 L. J. Q. B. 280 ; 

32 W. R. 645 ' 651 

Walker v. Broadstock (1795), 1 Esp. 458 444 

Walker i). Butler (1856), 25 L. J. Q. B. 377 ; 6 E. & B. 506 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 

687 714 

Walker v. Gardner (1832), 4 B. & Ad. 371 733 

Walker v. Gode (1861), 30 L. J. Ex. 172 ; 6 H. & N. 594 524 

Walker v. G. W. Ry. Co. (1867), 36 L. J. Ex. 123 ; L. R. 2 Ex. 228 ; 15 

W. R. 769 641 

Walker v. Milue (1849), 11 Bear. 607 ; 18 L. J. Ch. 288 684 

Walker v. Moore (1829), 10 B. & C. 416 773 

Walker v. Poole (1882), 21 Ch. D. 835 ; 51 L. J. Ch. 840 914 

Walker v. Richardson (1837), 2 M. & W. 882 ; M. & H. 251 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 

229 128, 659, 660, 662 

Walker v. Webb (1797), 3 Anst. 941 870 

Walker v. Wildman (1821), 6 Madd. 47 599, 601 

Walker v. Wilsher (1889), 23 Q. B. D. 335 ; 58 L. J. Q. B. 501 ; 37 W. R. 

723 42, 506, 514 

Walker v. Wingfield (1812), 18 Ves. 443 ; 11 R. R. 232 1049 

Walker v. Witter (1778), 1 Doug. 1 1155 

Wall's case (1872), L. R. 16 Eq. 18 ; 42 L. J. Ch. 372 155 

Wallace v. Brockley (1837), 5 Dowl. 695 732 

Wallace v. Cook (1804), 6 Esp. 117 1049, 1172 

Wallace ». Fielden (1851), 7 Moo. P. C. C. 398 179 

Wallace v. Kelsall (1840), 7 M. & W. 264 ; 8 Dowl. 841 ; 4 Jur. 1064 ; 10 

L. J. Ex. 12 487, 552, 744 

Wallace v. Pomfret (1805), 11 Ves. 547 ; 8 R. R. 241 806, S07 

Wallace v. Seymour (1871), Ir. R. 6 C. L. 196, 219, 343 704 

WaUace v. SmaU (1830), M. & M. 446 515, 711 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CCVl TABLE OF CASES CITED. 

FAai 
WaUer v. Lacy (1840), 1 M. & Gr. 54, 71 ; 8 Do-wl. 563 ; 8 Scott, N. E. 

186; 4 Jur. 435; 9 L. J. 0. P. 217 71:!, 715 

■Wallisj!. Littell (1861), 31 L. J. C. P. 100; 11 0. B. N. S. 369; 8 Jur. 

N. S. 745 ; 10 W. R. 192 746 

WalUs V. Smitli (1882), 21 Oh. D. 243 ; 47 L. T. 389 ; 52 L. J. Gh. 145 ; 

31 W. R. 214 44 

Walpole V. Alexander (1782), 3 Doug. 45 865, 866, 867 

Walroad v. Ha-wldna (1875), 44 L. J. C. P. 116 ; L. R. 10 C. P. 342 .... 522 

Walsh V. Nally (1877), I. R. 11 C. L. 337 732 

Walsh ». Trevanion (1850), 15 Q. B. 733 ; 19 L. J. Q. B. 458 740 

Walsh V. Wilson (1851), 1 Ir. Eq. R. 610 867 

Walsham «. Stainton (1863), 2 H. & M. 1 599 

Walsingham, Ld. v. Goodrioke (1843), 3 Hare, 124 593, 601. 602 

Walter v. BoUman (1839), 8 Watts, 544 458 

Walter v. Cubley (1833), 2 0. & M. 151 1195 

Walter v. Haynes (1824), Ry. & M. 149 155 

Walters v. Morgan (1792), 2 Cox, Ch. 369 682 

Walters v. Rees (1819), 4 Moore, C. P. 34 869, 871 

Walton, Ex parte. Re Levy (1881), 17 Ch. D. 766 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 662; 45 

L. T. 1 ; 30 W. R. 395 662, 741 

Walton V. Chandler (1845), 1 C. B. 307 ; 2 Dowl. & L. 802 ; 14 L. J. C. P. 

149 ; 9 Jur. 257 732 

Walton V. Green (1825), 1 C. & P. 621 500, 601 

Walton V. Hastings (1816), 4 Camp. 223 ; 1 Stark. 215 1194, 1203 

Walton V. SheUey (1786), 1 T. R. 296 877 

Walton V. Waterhouse (1672), 3 Wms. Saunders, 417a 96 

Wambough v. Sohank (1807), 1 Penningt. 229 172 

Wankford v. Fotherley (1694), 2 Vern. 322 539 

Ward V. Day (1864), 7 Notes of Cas. (Eco. & Mar.) 96, 101 522 

Ward V. Dey (1849), 33 L. J. Q. B. 3, 254 ; 4 B. & S. 337 ; 5 B. & S. 359 ; 

10 L. T. 578 ; 12 W. R. 829 937 

Ward V. Gamgee (1891), 66 L. T. 610 ; 40 W. R. .'^O 915 

Ward V. Hobbs (1878), 4 App. Cas. 13 ; 48 L. J. Q. B. 2S1 ; 40 L. T. 73 ; 

27 W. R. 114 777 

Ward V. Johnson (1807), 13 Mass. 148 1115 

Ward V. Londesborough, Ld. (1862), 12 C. B. 252 168 

Ward, Ld. v. Lumley (1860), 29 L. J. Ex. 322 ; 6 H. & N. 87 669, 1197 

Ward V. Pearson (1839), 6 M. & W. 18 ; 8 L. J. Ex. 163 ; 7 Dowl. 382 . . 187 

Ward V. Pomfret (1832), 6 Sim. 475 ; 2 L. J. Ch. 22 447 

Ward V. Ryan (1876), 10 Ir. R. C. L. 17 97 

Ward V. Sinfield (1880), 49 L. J. C. P. 696 ; 43 L. T. 252 948 

Ward V. Ward (1848), 11 Beav. 377 1045, 1132 

Ward V. Wells (1809), 1 Taun. 461 ; 10 R. R. 581 328, 1213 

Warde v. Warde (1851), 3 Mac. & G. 365 ; 21 L. J. Ch. 90 602 

WardeU v. Fermor (1809), 2 Camp. 282 1216 

Warden v. Jones (1857), 2 De G. & J. 76 ; 27 L. J. Ch. 190 ; 4 Jar. N. S. 

269 ; 23 Beav. 487 679, 680 

Ware ». Cumberlege (1855), 20 Beav. 503 ; 24 L. J. Ch. 630 ; 1 Jur. N. S. 745 683 

Warickshall's case (1783), 1 Lea. 263 ; 2 East, P. C. 658 557, 558, 562 

Waring v. Waring (1848), 6 Moo. P. C. C. 341 ; 6 Notes of Cas. (Eoo. & 

Mar.) 394 263 

Warmsley v. Child (1749), 1 Ves. sen. 141 , 308 

Warner v. Mosses (1881), 50 L. J. Ch. 28 ; 43 L. T. 401 ; 29 W. R. 201 . . 349 
Warner v. WiEington (1856), 3 Drew. 523 ; 26 L. J. Ch. 662 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 

433 671, 672, 675 

WarraU, Re, Ex parte Cossens (1820), Buck. 531 970 

Warren v. Anderson (1839), 8 Soott, 384 1218. 1220 

Warren v. Stagg (1787), cited 3 T. R. 591 752 

Warren «. Warren (1834), 1 C. M. & R. 250 ; 4 Tyr. 850 155 

Warren Hastings' case (1788), cited 30 How. St. tr 492 ; 2 Ph. Ev. 451. . 1179 

Warrender v. Warrender (1834), 9 Bli. N. S. 89 ; 2 CI. & Fin. 488 1144 

Warrick v. Queen's Coll., Ox. (Betts v. Thompson) (1867), 40 L. J. Ch. 

785 ; L. R. 6 Ch. 732 ; 26 L. T. 264 ; 19 W. R. 1098 994 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CCVll 

PAGE 

■Warriner v. Giles (1734), 2 Str. 954, 1223, n. 1 1050 

■Warrington v. Early (1853), 2 E. & B. 763 ; 23 L. J. Ex. 47 ; 18 Jur. 42. 1194 
"Warwick v. Bruce (1813), 2 M. & Sel. 205 ; 6 Taun. 118 ; 14 R. R. 634 . . 686 
Warwick v. Foulkes (1844), 12 M. & W. 507 ; 1 Dowl. & L. 638 ; 13 L. J. 

Ex. 109 ; 8 Jur. 85 244 

"Warwick v. Hooper (1850), 2 Mac. & G. 60 622 

Warwick v. Queen's Coll. (1871), L. R. 3 Eq. 683 ; 36 L. J. Ch. 505 ; 18 

W. R. 19 ; 23 L. T. 63 394, 398 

Warwick v. Rogers (1843), 5 M. & Gr. 340 ; 6 Scott, N. R. 1 ; 12 L. J. 

C. P. 113 1200 

Wason V. Walter (1869), 8 B. & S. 671 ; 38 L. J. Q. B. 34 ; L. R. 4 Q. B. 

73 ; 19 L. T. 409 ; 17 W. R. 169 4 

Waterford, Estate of M. of. Re (1871), Ir. R. 5 Bq. 434 768 

Waterford, Corp. of D. Price (1846), 9 Ir. L. R. 310 1175 

Waterford Ry. Co. v. Wolsely (1851), 1 Ir. 0. L. R. 444 1176 

Waterford, Wexford, Wicklow and Dublin Ry. Co. v. Pidoock (1853), 8 

Ex. 279 ; 7 Railw. Cas. 439 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 146 ; 17 Jur. 26 1176 

Waterloo Bridge Co. •.,. Cull (1859), 28 L. J. Q. B. 75 ; 1 E. & E. 213 ; 5 

Jur. N. S. 464 112 

Waterman v. Soper (1697), 1 Ld. Ray. 737 114 

Waterpark v. Fennell (1859), 7 H. L. Cas. 650 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 1135 ; 7 W. 

R. 634 791, 792 

Waters «. Earl of Thanet (1842), 2 Q. B. 757 ; 2 G. & D. 166; 6 Jur. 

708 712 

Waters v. Hewlett (1831), cited 1 A. & E. 8 371 

Waters v. Thorn (1856), 22 Beav. 547, 556, 557 68 

Waters v. Tomkins (1835), 2 C. M. & R. 723 ; 1 Tyr. & Gr. 137 714, 717 

WatMns, Ex parte (1752), 2 Ves. sen. 470a 1150 

Watkins, Re (1865), 35 L. J. P. & M. 14 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 19 701 

Watkins v. Morgan (1834), 6 C. & P. 661 191 

Watkins v. Nash (1875), L. R. 20 Eq. 262 ; 44 L. J. Ch. 605 1204 

Watkins v. RymiU (1883), 10 Q. B. D. 178 ; 52 L. J. Q. B. 121 ; 48 L. T. 

426 ; 31 W. R. 337 86 

Watson V. Clark (1813), 1 Dow, 336 ; 14 R. R. 73 176 

Watson V. Gray (1880), 14 Ch. D. 192 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 243 ; 42 L. T. 294 ; 

28 W. R. 438 ; 44 J. P. 537 113 

Watson V. King (1815), 1 Stark. R. 121 ; 4 Camp. 272 173, 1049, 1172 

Watson V. King (1846), 3 C. B. 608 506 

Watson V. Lane (1866), 11 Ex. 769 ; 26 L. J. Ex. 101 97, 98 

Watson V. Little (I860), 29 L. J. Ex. 267 ; 5 H. & N. 472 1097 

Watson V. Spratley (1854), 10 Ex. 237 ; 24 L. J. Ex. 53 683, 684, 685 

Watson t>. Threlkeld (1798), 2 Esp. 637 ; 5 R. R. 760 539 

Watson V. Waoe (1826), 5 B. & C. 153 542 

Watson V. Watson (1864), 33 Beav. 574 806 

Watson V. Woodman (1875), L. R. 20 Eq. 721 ; 46 L. J. Ch. 67 ; 24 W. 

R. 47 387 

Watters v. Smith (1831), 2 B. & Ad. 892 1115 

Watts V. Ainsworth (1862), 3 F. & F. 12 ; 1 H. & C. 83 ; 31 L. J. Ex. 

448 ; 6 L. T. 252 675 

Watts V. Fraser (1837), 7 A. & E. 323 ; 1 M. & Rob. 449 ; 7 C. & P. 369. .246, 

246 
Watts v. Kelson (1870), L. R. 6 Ch. 166 ; 40 L. J. Ch. 126 ; 24 L. T. 209; 

19 W. R. 338 115 

Watts V. Lawson (1830), M. & M. 447, n 515 

Watts v. Thorpe (1808), 1 Camp. 376 498 

Waugh V. Bussell (1814), 5 Taim. 707 ; 1 Marsh. 214, 311 ; 16 R. R. 624. 1196 

Waugh V. Carver (1793), 2 H. Bl. 235 ; 14 R. R. 845 159 

Waugh V. Cope (1840), 6 M. & W. 824 714 

Wayman v. Hilliard (1830), 7 Bing. 101 ; 4 M. & P. 729 615 

Waymell v. Reed (1794), 6 T. R. 600 ; 2 R. R. 675 747 

Weale v. Lower (1672), Pollexfen, 67 170 

WeaR V. Rice (1831), 2 Russ. & My. 251 ; 9 L. J. Ch. 116 806, 807 

Weaver v. Price (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 409 1101 

Vol. I. ends with page 636. 



CCVIU TABLE OP CASES CITED. 

FASE 

"Webb's Estate, Ee (1870), Ir. R. 5 Eq. 235 171 

Webb, Re (1855), 1 Deane, Eoo. R. 1 694 

Webb V. Austiu (1844), 7 M. & Gr. 701 ; 8 Scott, N. R. 419 ; 13 L. J. C. 

P. 203 96 

Webb V. Bird (1863), 13 0. B. N. S. 841 ; 31 L. J. C. P. 335 ; 8 Jur. N. 

S. 621 125 

Webb V. Byng (1855), 1 K. & J. 680 786 

Webb V. East (1880), 5 Ex. D. 23 964, 1182 

Webb 4). Fox (1797), 7 Tr. 391 ; 4 R. R. 472 116, 117 

Webb V. Hayoook (1854), 19 Beav. 342 421 

Webb V. Heme Bay Improvement Com. (1870), 39 L. J. Q. B. 221 ; L. R. 

5 Q. B. 642 ; 22 L. T. 745 641 

Webb V. Manoh. and Leeds Ry. Co. (1839), 4 My. & Cr. 120 ; 1 Railw. 

Cas. 676 932 

Webb V. Paternoster (1620), Palm. 71 ; RoQe, R. 143 ; Noy, 98 ; Poph. 

151 ; Godb. 282 638 

Webb V. Petts (undated), Noy, 44 398 

Webb V. Plnmmer (1819), 2 B. & Aid. 746 781 

Webb V. Smith (1824), 1 C. & P. 337 488, 695 

Webb V. Taylor (1843), 1 Dowl. & L. 684 ; 13 L. J. Q. B. 24 ; 8 Jur. 39 . .869, 

871 
Webber v. Corbett (1874), 43 L. J. Ch. 164 ; 16 L. R. Eq. 515 ; 29 L. T. 

366 793 

Webber v. East. Ry. Co. (1840), 2 Meto. 147 932 

Webber «. Lee (1882), 61 L. J. Q. B. 174, 485 ; 9 Q. B. D. 315 682 

Webber v. Stanley (1864), 16 C. B. N. S. 698 ; 33 L. J. C. P. 217 803 

Webster v. Bray (1848), 7 Hare, 159 160 

Webster v. CeoQ (1861), 30 Beav. 62 750 

Webster v. Cook (1867), L. R. 2 Ch. 542 ; 36 L. J. Ch. 763 ; 13 W. R 1001 137 

Webstfer v. Lee (1809), 6 Maes. 334 1123 

Wedderbume's case (1746), 18 How. St. Tr. 425 ; Post. C. L. 246 236 

Wedge V. Berkeley (1837), 6 A. & E. 663 ; 1 N. & P. 665 ; W. W. & D. 

271 31, 39 

Wedgwood's case (1831), 8 Greenl. 76 1173 

Weeks v. Argent (1847), 16 M. & W. 817 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 209 ; 11 Jur. 526. .602, 

607 

Weeks v. Maillardet (1811), 14 East, 568 1205, 1206 

Weeks v. Propert (1873), 42 L. J. O. P. 129 ; L. R. 8 C. P. 427 ; 21 W. R. 

676 780 

Weeks V. Sparke (1813), 1 M. & Sel. 686 ; 14 R. R. 546 .... 393, 396, 398, 401 

Weidmans. Kohr (1818), 4 Serg. & R. 174 413, 510 

Weidner v. Sohweigart (1823), 9 Serg. & R. 3S5 154 

Welch V. Barrett (1819), 16 Mass. 380 464 

Welch V. Mandeville (1816), 1 Wheat. 233 488 

Welch V. Nash (1807), 8 East, 394 ; 9 R. R. 478 1136 

Welch V. Phillips (1856), 1 Moo. P. C. R. 299, 302 143 

Welch V. Seaborn (1816), 1 Stark. R. 474 154 

Weld V. Hornby (1806), 7 East, 199 ; 3 Smith, 244 ; 8 R. R. 608 79D, 792 

Welfare v. Lond. & Brigh. Ry. Co. (1869), L. R. 4 Q. B. G93 ; 38 L. J. 

Q. B. 241; 20L. T. 743; 17 W. R. 1066 163 

WeHord v. Beezely (1747), 1 Ves. sen. 6 ; 1 Wils. 118 674 

WeUand Can. Co. v. Hathaway (1832), 8 Wend. 480 293, 629 

Welland v Ld. Middleton (1844), 11 Ir. Eq. R. 603 1050, 1054, 1173 

WeUs V. Pisher (1831), 6 C. & P. 12 ; 1 M. & Rob. 99, and n 890 

Wells V. Pletcher (1831), 6 C. & P. 12 ; 1 M. & Rob. 99, and n 890 

Wells V. Horton (1826), i Bing. 40 ; 12 Moore, C. P. 176 682 

WeUs V. Jesus CoUege (1836), 7 C. & P. 284 398, 401 

Wells V. Kingston-upon-Hull (1875), L. R. 10 0. P. 402 ; 44 L. J. C. P. 

257 ; 32 L. T. 615 ; 23 W. R. 562 641, 683 

Wells V. Wells (1874), 43 L. J. Ch. 681 ; L. R. 18 Eq. 504 ; 31 L. T. 16 ; 

22 W. R. 893 741, 793 

Welman v. Wehnan (1880), 16 Oh. D. 570 ; 49 L. J. Ch. 736 ; 43 L. T. 

145 139, 749 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CCIX 

PAGB 

"Welsteade. Levy (1831), 1 M. & Eob. 139 27, 496, 511, 514 

Wemyss «. Hopkins (1876), 44 L. J. M. 0. 101 ; L. R. 10 Q. B. 378 ; 32 

L. T. 9 ; 23 W. R. 691 1131 

Wernnan v. Mackenzie (1855), 5 E. & B. 447 ; 25 L. J. Q. B. 44 ; 1 Jur. 

N. S. 1016, 1049, n 406, 1116, 1161 

"Wentworth v. Lloyd (1864), 33 L. J. Cli. 688 ; 10 H. L. Cas. 589 ; 10 L. T. 

767 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 961 109 

Wequelin v. Wequelin (1839), 2 Curt. 263 353 

West, Re (1862), 32 L. J. P. & M. 182 ; 12 "W. R. 89 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 1158 699 

West V. Baxendale (1850), 9 C. B. 141 ; 19 L. J, C. P. 149 30, 189 

"West V. Blakeway (1841), 2 M. & Gr. 729; 9 Dowl. 846 ; 3 Soott, N. R. 

199; 15 Jur. 461; 10 L. J. C. P. 173 544, 750, 751 

West V. Lawday (1865), 2 Ir. E. Eq. 517 801 

West V. Moore (1807), 8 East, 343 ; 9 R. R. 460 145 

West V. Ray (1854), 1 Kay, 385 ; 23 L. J. Ch. 447 ; 2 Eq. R. 431 ; 2 W. 

R. 319 693 

West «. Steward (1845), 14 M. & W. 47 1202, 1204, 1205, 1206 

West Cambridge v. Lexington (1824), 2 Pick. 536 443 

West of Canada Oil, &c. Co., Re (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 683 ; 6 Ch. D. 109 ; 

25 W. R. 787 345, 917 

West ComwaU Ry. Co. v. Mowatt (1850), 15 Q. B. 521 ; 19 L. J. Q. B. 

478 ; 16 Jur. 101 ; 1 Drew. 247 1176 

West Jewell Tin Mining Co., In re (1879), 10 Ch. D. 579 ; 48 L. J. Ch. 426 ; 

40 L. T. 43; 27 W. R. 310 1233 

West of Eng. Bk. v. Canton Ins. Co. (1877), 2 Ex. D. 472 1180 

WestLondon Com. Bk. v. Kitson (1884), 63 L. J. Q. B. 2i8, 345 ; 13 Q. B. D. 

360; 50L. T. 656; 32 W. R. 757 780 

Westoby v. Day (1853), 2 E. & B. 605 ; 22 L. J. Q. B. 418 ; 18 Jur. 10. .7, 1116 

Weston, Re (1869), L. R. 1 P. & D. 633 ; 38 L. J. P. & M. 53 703 

Weston's case. In re (1879), 10 Ch. D. 579 ; 48 L. J. Ch. 425 ; 40 L. T. 

43 ; 27 W. R. 310 1233 

Weston V. Ernes (1808), 1 Taun. 115 766 

Wetherall, Ex parte, Middleton v. PoUock (1876), 4 Ch. D. 49 ; 46 L. J. 

Ch. 39; 35L. T. 608; 25 W. R. 94 539 

Wetherell v. Langston (1847), 1 Ex. 634 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 338 675 

Wey V. Tally (1704), 6 Mod. 194 8 

Whaleyw. CarUsle (1866), 17 Ir. C. L. R. 792 18,441 

Whalley r. Pepper (1836), 7 C. & P. 506 872 

Wharam v. Routledge (1805), 5 Esp. 235 ; 8 R. R. 851 1191 

Wharram v Wharcam (1863), 33 L. J. P. & M. 76 ; 3 S. & T. 301 ; 10 Jur. 

N. S. 499 ; 10 L. T. 163 ; 12 W. R. 889 307 

Wharton Peer. (1846), 12 CI. & Fin. 301 ..1035, 1092 

Wharton v. Mackenzie (1844), 6 Q. B. 606 ; 1 Dav. & M. 644 ; 8 Jur. 466; 

13 L.J. Q. B. 130 49 

Whateley v. Spooner (1857), 3 K. & J. 542 786, 796 

Whatman, Re (1805), 34 L. J. P. & M. 17 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 1242 801 

Wheatcroft's case (1873), 42 L. J. Ch. 853 ; 29 L. T. 324 526 

Wheatley I). WilUams (1836), 1 M. & W. 533 ; 2 Gale, 140; 1 T. & G. 

1043 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 237 609, 611 

Wheaton v. Maple (1893), 3 Ch. 48 ; 62 L. J. Ch. 963 ; 68 L. T. 641 ; 69 

L. T. 208 ; 41 W. R. 677 119 

Wheeldou v. Burrows (1878), 12 Ch. D. 31 ; 48 L. J. Ch. 853 ; 41 L. T. 

327 ; 28 W. R. 196 115 

Wheeler, In re (1880), 49 L. J. P. D. & A. 29 ; 42 L. T. 60 ; 28 W. R. 476; 

44 J. P. 285 706 

Wheeler v. Alderson (1831), 3 Hagg. Eoo. 587 140, 371, 930 

Wheeler v. Atkins (1805), 5 Esp. 246 355 

Wheeler v. Collier (1827), M. & M. 125 671 

Wheeler v. Fox (1841), 3 Ir. L. R. 302, n 869 

Wheeler v. Le Marcbant (1881), 17 Ch. D. 681 ; 60 L. J. Ch. 795 ; 44 L. T. 

632; 45 J. P. 728 694, 1183 

Wheeler v. Lowth (1710), Comyn's Dig. tit. " Evid.," c. 1 1035 

Wheeling's case (1789), 1 Lea. 311, n 560 

Vol, I. ends with page 635. 



CCX TABLE OF CASES CTTED. 

PAOB 

Whioher, Re, Stevens, Ex parte (1888), 5 M. B. R. 173 849 

Wiicker v. Hume (1859), 28 L. J. Ch. 396 ; 7 H. L. Cas. 124 ; 4 Jur. N. S. 

933 179, 180, 1103 

WhlfFen v. Hardwright (1848), 11 Beav. Ill 514 

Wtippy V. Hillary (1832), 3 B. & Ad. 399 ; 5 C. & P. 209 712 

"Whistler v. Eorster (1833), 32 L. J. C. P. 161 ; 14 C. B. N. S. 248 ; 8 L. T. 

317 ; 11 "W. R. 648 546 

Whitaker v. Izod (1809), 2 Tami. 115 ; 321, 969 

Whitaker v. Tatham (1831), 7 Bing. 628 ; 6 M. & P. 628 794 

WhitakerB.Wisbey (1852), 12 0. B. 56,69; 21L. J. C.P. 116; 16 Jur. 411.. 19, 

84, 135, 283 

Whitcomb v. Whiting (1781), 2 Doug. 652 ; 1 Sm. L. C. 555 488 

White, Re (1850), 2 Roberts. 194 698 

White, Re (1861), 30 L. J. P. & M. 55 142 

White V. Birch (1867), 36 L. J. Ch. 174 ; 16 W. R. 305 ; 16 L. T. 605 . . 801 

White V. Cuyler (1795),, 6 T. R. 176 ; 1 Esp. 200 ; 3 R. R. 147 645 

White V. Bowling (1846), 8 Ir. L. R. 128 500 

White V. Greenish (1861), 11 C. B. N. S. 209 ; 8 Jur. N. S. 563 548 

White V. Hawn (1810), 5 Johns. 351 906 

White V. Lisle (1819), 4 Madd. 214 396, 398 

White «!. M'Dermott (1872), L R. 7 C. L. 1 144 

White t>. Morris (1852), 11 C. B. 1015; 21 L. J. C. P. 185; 16 Jur. 500 .. 481 

White V. Parkin (1810), 12 East, 578 ; 11 R. R. 488 754 

White V. Proctor (1811), 4 Taun. 209 ; 13 R. R. 580 730 

White V. Repton (1844), 3 Curt. 818 702 

White ». Sayer (1622), Palm. 211 768 

White D. Sharp (1844), 12 M. &W.- 712; 13 L. J. Ex. 215 ; iDowl. &L. 

10r,9 ; 1 C. & K. 348 ; 8 Jur. 344 1039 

White V. Smith (1841), Arm. M. & 0. 171 977 

White, Ex parte. White v. Tommey (1853), 4 H. L. Cas. 313 1133 

White 1). Trustees of the British Museum (1829), 6 Bing. 310 696 

White V. Wilson (1800), 2 Bos. & P. 116 757 

White V. Wilson (1806), 13 Ves. 87 ; 14 Ves. 151 170 

White's case, R. v. White (1823), R. & R. 508 660 

Whiteacre v. Symonds (1808), 10 East, 13 ; 10 R. R. 224 47 

Whitehead v. Clifford (1814), 5 Taun. 518 660 

Whitehead v. Scott (1830), 1 M. & Rob. 2 289, 318, 372 

Whitehead v. Tattersall (1834), 1 A. & E. 491 499 

Whitehouse v. Hemmant (1858), 27 L. J. Ex. 295 1231, 1232 

Whiteley v. King (1854), 17 C. B. N. S. 756 ; 10 Jur. N. S. 1079 ; 11 L. T. 

342 ; 13 W. R. 83 143 

Whitelooke J). Baker (1807), 13 Ves. 514; 9 R. R. 216 408, 413 

Whitelook v. MusgroTe (1833), 1 C. & M. 511 ; 3 Tyr. 541 1216, 1219 

Whitefleld v. Brand (1847), 16 M. & W. 282 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 103 288 ' 

Whitfieldj).SouthEast.Ry.Co.(1858),27L. J. Q.B.229; lE.B.&E. 115..111,643 
Whitford v. Tutin (1834), 10 Bing. 395 ; 4 M. & So. 166 ; 4 L. J. K. B. 63 286 

Whitley v. Gough (1556-7), Dyer, 140 658 

Whitmore v. Humphries (1871), L. R. 7 C. P. 1 ; 41 L. J. C. P. 43 ; 25 

L. T. 496 ; 20 W. R. 79 116 

Whitnash v. George (1828), 8 B. & C. 556 437, 508 

Whitney v. Boordman (1875), 118 Mass. 242 763 

Whittaker v. Edmunds (1834), 1 M. & Rob. 366 ; 1 A. & E. 638 261 

Whittaker v. Jackson (1864), 33 L. J. Ex. 181 ; 2 H. & C. 926 ; 11 L. T. 

155 1113, 1119, 1120 

Whitting, Re, Ex parte Hall (1878), 10 Ch. D. 816; 48 L. J. Bank. 79; 

40L. T. 179; 27 W. R. 385 651, 652 

Whittuok V. Waters (1830), 4 C. & P. 376 419, 424, 1047 

Whitwell V. Perrin (1858), 4 C. B. N. S. 412 179 

Whitwell V. Wyer (1814), 11 Mass. 6 479 

Whitwill V. Soheer (1838), 8 A. & E. 301 ; 3 N. & P. 391 ; 7 L. J. Q. B. 

244 189, 192, 194 

Whitworth's case (1881), 19 Oh. D. 118 ; 51 L. J. Oh. 71 ; 45 L. T. 449 ; 

30 W. R. 33 845 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CCXl 

PAGE 

Whyman v. Garth (1853), 8 Ex. 803 ; 22 L. J. Ex. 316 1208 

Whyte «. Ahrena (1884), 26 Oh. D. 717 ; SOL. T. 344; 32 W. R. 649. . .. 1188 
Whyte V. Rose (1842), 4 P. & D. 199 ; 3 Q,. B. 495 ; 2 G. & D. 312 . . . .17, 19, 

1133, 1101 
Wifikens v. Goatley (1851), 11 C. B. 666 ; 21 L. J. C. P. 50 ; 2 L. M. & P. 

572 18 

Wickham v. M. of Bath (1865), 35 L. J. Ch. 5 ; L. R. 1 Eq. 17 ; 36 Beav. 

69 ; 13 L. T. 313 ; 14 W. R. 21 ; 11 Jur. N. S. 988 731 

Wickham v. Hawker (1840), 7 M. & W. 63 ; 10 L. J. Ex. 153 638 

Wickham v. Lee (1848), 12 Q. B. 626 ; 18 L. J. Q. B. 21 ; 12 Jur. 628 . . 1125 

Wickham v. Wickham (1856), 2 K. & J. 478 677 

Widdows' Trusts, Re (1871), L. R. 11 Eq. 408 ; 40 L. J. Ch. 380 ; 24 L. 

T. 87 ; 19 W. R. 468 101 

Wiedeman v. Walpole, (1891) 2 Q. B. 634 ; 60 L. J. Q. B. 762 ; 40 W. R. 

114 625, 881 

Wieler v. Sohillizzi (1866), 17 C. B. 619 ; 25 L. J. C. P. 89 776 

Wigglesworth v. DalUson (1778), 1 Doug. 201 ; 1 Bligh, 287 ; 1 Smith. L. C. . 768 
Wight's Mortgage Trusts, Re (1873), 43 L. J.-Ch. 66; L. R. 16 Eq. 41 ; 

28 L. T. 491 738 

Wihen v. Law (1821), 3 Stark. 63 1170 

Wike «). Lightner (1824), 11 Serg. & R. 198; Swift, Ev. 143 972, 973 

Wilbur V. Selden (1826), 6 Cowen, 162 328, 354 

Wilby V. Elgee (1875), L. R. 10 C. P. 497 ; 44 L. J. C. P. 264 ; 32 L. T. 

310 711, 722 

Wilby V. Elston (1849), 7 Bowl. & L. 143; 8 C. B. 142; 18 L. J. 0. P. 

320 ; 13 Jur. 706 223 

Wildes V. Dudlow (1876), 44 L. J. Ch. 341 ; L. R. 19 Eq. 198 ; 23 W. R. 

435 679 

Wiles V. Woodward (1851), 5 Ex. 557 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 261 94 

Wilkes V. Hopkins (1845), 1 C. B. 737 ; 3 Dowl. & L. 184 ; 14 L. J. C. P. 

225 476 

Wilkin V. Reed (iVsV)^ iV C. B. 192, i98,'265 • "-22 L.' J. C.'P. 193;' 'l8 Jur'. 

1081 40, 191, 193 

Wilkins v. Jadis (1831), 2 B. & Ad. 188 ; 1 M. & Rob. 41 33, 621 

Wilkius V. Stephens (1842), 1 Y. & C. (Ch.) 431 666 

Wilkinson, In re (1881), 6 P. Div. 100 ; 29 W. R. 896 ; 45 J. P. 716 707 

Wilkinson v. Evans (1866), 35 L. J. C. P. 224 ; L. R. 1 C. P. 407 ; H. & R. 

622 ; 14 W. R. 963 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 600 673 

Wilkinson v. Gordon (1824), 2 Add. (Ecc.) 162 1116 

Wilkinson v. Johnston (1824), 3 B. & C. 428 ; 5 D. & R. 403 1200 

Wilkinson v. Kirby (1854), 23 L. J. C. P. 224 ; 15 C. B. 430 ; 2 C. L. R. 

1387; 1 Jur. N. S. 164 1119 

Wilkinson v. Storey (1839), 1 Jebb & Sy. 509 44 

Wilkinson v. Verity (1871), L. R. 6 C. P. 206 ; 40 L. J. C. P. 141 ; 24 

L. T. 32 ; 19 W. R. 604 71 

Wmesford, Re (1842), 3 Curt. 77 701 

Williams, Ex parte (1824), 13 Price, 673 ; M'Clel. 493 811 

Williams, Rq (1865), 35 L. J. P. & M. 2 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 4 698 

Williams v. Armroyd (1813), 7 Craneh, 423 1150 

WiUiams v. Ashton (1860), 1 J. & H. 115 142 

Williams v. Bryant (1839). 5 M. & W. 447 ; 7 Dowl. P. C. 502 ; 9 L. J. 

Ex.47 216, 543 

WilHams v. Byrnes (1863), 2 New R. 47 ; 1 Moo. P. C. C. 154 ; 8 L. T. 

69 ; 11 W. R. 487 671 

WiUiams v. Callender (1810), Holt, N. P. 307 255 

WiUiams v. Comm. (1879), 91 Pa. St. 493 627 

Williams ». Davies (1833), 11 Q. B. D. 74 ; 52 L. J. M. C. 87 ; 47 J. P. 

ggj 272 273 

Wimanis'«i'/E.'lnd.'c'o'.'('l'8'o'2),''3'E'ast,'i92,''2'o'l";''6'R.'R'.'6'8'9';''B^ ' 

298 105, 260 

WUliamsc. Evans (1863), 2 H. &N. 771; 27L. J.Ex. 176; 1 E.&B.727.. 704 
WilUams v. Evans (1875), 44 L. J. Ch. 319 ; L. R. 19 Eq. 547 ; 32 L. T. 
359 ; 23 W. R. 466 688 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CCXU TABLE OF CASES CITED, 

vAon 

Wmiams v. Eyton (1859), 4 H. & N. 357 ; 27 L. J. Ex. 176 122, 1039 

WUliams v. Fairington (1789), 2 Cox (Ch.) 202 965 

"WUliams v. Geaves (1838), 8 C. & P. 692 437, 438 

"Williams «i. ariffith (1849), 3 Ex. 335; 18L. J. Ex.210 711 

WDUams v. Griffiths (1839), 2 0. M. & E. 46 ; 1 Gale, 65 ; 5 Tyr. 748. .. . 715 

"Williams «. Gutoh (1857), 14 Moo. P. C. C. 202 6 

■Williams v. Hulie (1663), 1 Sid. 131 ; Swift, Evid. 512 919 

"Williams v. Innes (1808), 1 Camp. 364 ; 10 R. K. 702 498 

"Williams !;. Jones (1841), 11 A. & E. 643 227 

Williams v. Jones (1849), 7 Notes of Cases, 106 143 

"Williams v. Jones (1887), 36 "W. R. 573 764 

"WilHams v. Jordan (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 681 ; 6 Ch. D. 517 ; 26 "W. R. 230. 671 
"WiUiams v. Lake (1859), 29 L. J. Q. B. 1 ; 2 E. & E. 349 ; 1 L. T. 56 ; 6 

Jut. N. S. 45 671 

"Williams v. Lucas, (1892) 2 Q. B. 113 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 695 ; 66 L. T. 706. 310 

"Williams v. Morgan (1850), 15 Q. B. 782 277, 398 

Williams v. Morris (1841), 8 M. & W. 488 ; 11 L. J. Ex. 126 638 

Williams v. Mudie (1824), 1 C. & P. 168 : Ry. & M. 34 593 

Williams v. Pigott (1848), 2 Ex. 201 ; 17 L. J. Ex. 196 : 5 Railw. Cas. 544 ; 

12 Jur. 313 541 

WUliams v. Scottish Widows' Fund (1888), 62 J. P. 471 ; 4 Times L. R. 

489 172 

WilUams v. Smith (1819), 2 B. & Aid. 496 32 

Williams v. Steele (1835), 4 Law Rec. (lat Series) 169 870 

WiUiams v. Stern (1879), 5 Q. B. D. 409 ; 49 L. J. Q. B. 663 ; 42 L. T. 

719 ; 28 W. R. 901 751 

Williams v. Swansea Canal Navig. Co. (1868), L. R. 3 Ex. 158 1068 

WiUiams v. Thomas (1862), 2 Dr. & Sm. 29 ; 31 L J. Ch. 674 ; 7 L. T. 184; 

8 Jur. N. S. 250 606 

WiUiams v. Tyley (1858), Johns. 530 706 

Williams «). Walsby (1803), 4 Esp. 220 645 

WiUiams f. Wheeler (I860), 8 C. B. N. S. 316 681 

Williams v. Wilcox (1838), 8 A. & E. 314 ; 3 N. & P. 606 ; 1 W. W. &H. 

477 1231 

WilUams v. Williams (1693), Carth. 269 5 

WiUiams v. WiUiams (1798), 1 Hagg. Cons. 304 183, 502, 556 

WiUiams v. Williams (1863), 32 Bear. 370 666, 806 

WiUiams v. WiUiams (1868), 37 L. J. Ch. 854 679 

Williams v. WiUiams (1877), 8 Ch. D. 789, 793 ; 47 L. J. Ch. 857 ; 27 

W. R. 100 : 39 L. T. 180 146, 704 

WUliams v. Williams (1866), L. R. 2 Ch. 15 268 

WiUiams ». WUliams and Padfield (1866), 35 L. J. P. & M. 8 ; L. R. 1 P. 

& D. 29 ; 13 L. T. 610 501 

WiUiams v. Wilson (1853), 9 Ex. 90 ; 1 C. L. R. 921 ; 23 L. J. Ex. 17 . . 1160 

WiUiams v. Tounghusband (1815), 1 Stark. R. 139 303 

WUliamson v. Allison (1802), 2 East, 446 200, 201 

WiUiamson v. Barton (1862), 31 L. J. Ex. 170 ; 7 H. & N. 899 ; 8 Jur. 

N. S. 341 ; 5 L. T. 800 758 

WiUiamson (Wilkinson) v. Scott (1821), 17 Mass. 249 652 

WilUngham v. Matthews (1815), 6 Taun. 358 ; 2 Marsh. 57 866, 869 

Willins V. Smith (1854), 4 E. & B. 180 ; 3 C. L. R. 16 ; 24 L. J. Q. B. 62 ; 

1 Jur. N. S. 163 713 

WUUsf. Bernard (1832), 8 Bing. 376; lMo.&Sc.584; 1 L. J. C.P. 118.. 375 

Willis V. Jemegan (1741), 2 Atk. 252 625 

WUUs V. Newham (1830), Y. & J. 518 717 

WUlis V. Peckham (1820), 1 B. & B. 515 ; 4 Moore (C. P.) 300 820 

Willman v. WorraU (1838), 8 C. & P. 380 1216, 1220 

WiUmett v. Harmer (1839), 8 C. & P. 695 105 

Willock V. Noble (1875), L. R. 7 H. L. 580 ; 44 L. J. Ch. 345 ; 32 L. T. 

419 ; 23 W. R. 809 709 

Willoughby v. Willoughby (1787), 1 T. R. 772 ; 1 R. R. 397 5, 21 

WUlson, Re, Nicholson, Ex parte (1880), 14 Ch. D. 243 ; 49 L. J. Bank. 

68 849 

The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



TABLE OF CASES CITED. CCXlll 

PAOE 

WUson V. Allen (1820), 1 Jao. & W. 611, 620 126 

Wilson ». Beddard (1846), 12 Sim. 28 700 

"Wilson V. Boerem (1818), 15 Johns. 286 466 

Wilson V. Bowie (1823), 1 C. & P. 10 289, 1191 

Wilson V. Butler (1838), 4 Bing. N. 0. 748 ; 6 Scott, 540 ; 8 L. J. 0. P. 143 . . 89 

WUson V. Oollum (1881), 9 L. R. Ir. 150 1213 

WHsou V. De Coulon (1883), 22 Oh. D. 841 ; 63 L. J. Ch. 248 ; 48 L. T. 

614 ; 31 W. E. 839 347 

Wilson V. Lady Duusauy (1854), 18 Beav. 293 ; 23 L. J. Ch. 492 ; 18 Jur. 

762 1152 

WUson V. Finch-Hatton (1877), 2 Ex. D. 336 ; 46 L. J. Ex. 489 ; 36 L. T. 

473 ; 26 W. B. 537 775 

Wilson V. Ford (1868), L. R. 3 Ex. 63 ; 37 L. J. Ex. 60 ; 17 L. T. 605 ; 

16 W. R. 482 166 

Wilson V. Hoare (183H), 10 A. & E. 236 39 

Wilson V. MitoheU (1813), 3 Camp. 393 600 

Wilson V. N. & Banb. Ry. (1872), L. R. 14 Eq. 477 ; 20 W. R. 938 ; 27 

L. T. 507 602 

Wilson V. O'Leary (1872), L. R. 12 Eq. 625 ; 40 L. J. Ch. 709 805 

Wilson V. Rastall (1792), 4 T. R. 460 ; 2 R. R. -"iie 594, 695, 598, 603, 607 

Wilson ». Robinson (1846), 7 Q. B. 68 ; 14 L. J. Q. B. 196 ; 9 Jur. 726 . . 246 

Wilson V. Rogers (1745-6), 2 Str. 1242 992 

Wilson V. Sewell (1766), 4 Burr. 1980 658 

WUson ». Sheriffs of London (1620), Brownl. 16 871 

WUson V. Turner (1808), 1 Taun. 398 ; 9 R. R. 797 606 

WUson V. Wallaui (1880), 6 Ex. D. 155 ; 49 L. J. Ex. 437 ; 42 L. T. 376 ; 

28 W. R. 697 ; 44 J. P. 475 662 

WUson V. WUson (1883), 5 P. Div. 8 : 49 L. T. 430 : 32 W. R. 282 341, 348 

Wilson's Trusts (1865), L. R. 1 Eq. 247 ; 36 L. J. Ch. 243 1143 

Wilton V. Dunn (1851), 17 Q. B. 294 ; 21 L. J. Q. B. 60 ; 15 Jur. 1104 . . 98 

WUton V. Webster (1839), 7 C. & P. 198 376 

Wiltshire «. Sidford (1827), 1 M. & R. 404 ; 8 B. & C. 259, n 113 

WUtzie V. Adamson (1789), 1 Ph. Ev. 357 526 

Windle v. Andrews (1819), 2 B. & Aid. 696 ; 2 Stark. 425 731 

Wing V. Angrave (1860), 8 H. L. Cas. 183 30 L. J. Ch. 65 174, 741 

Winn V. Bull (1877), 47 L. J. Ch. 139 ; 7 Ch. D. 29 ; 26 W. B. 230 673 

Winn V. Patterson (1835), 9 Pet. 663 429 

Winsor v. Dumford (1848), 12 Q. B. 603 ; 18 L. J. Q. B. 14 ; 12 Jur. 629 1014 
Winsor v. R. (1866), 35 L. J. M. C. 161 ; 7 B. & S. 490 ; L. R. 1 Q. B. 

390 ; 10 Cox, C. C. 276 ; 12 Jur. N. S. 561 ; 14 L. T. 567 ; 14 W. R. 

696 883 

Winter v. MUes (1808), 10 East, 578 ; 1 Camp. 475, n. ; 10 R. R. 391 4 

Winter v. Wroot (1834), 1 M. & Rob. 404 376 

Winterbottom v. Ld. Derby (1867), L. R. 2 Ex. 316 ; 36 L. J. Ex. 194 ; 16 

L. T. 771 ; 16 W. R. 15 125 

Wintle, Re (1870), L. R. 9 Eq. 373 ; 21 L. T. 781 ; 18 W. R. 394 1171 

Wisden v. Wisden (1849), 6 Beav. 549 815 

Wise V. Great West. Ry. Co. (1856), 26 L. J. Ex. 258 ; 1 H. & N. 63 722 

Wiseman's case (1824), Macq. H. L. Prac. 631 502 

Wishart v. Wyllie (1883), 1 Maoq. 389 HI 

Witham v. Taylor (1876), 3 Ch. D. 605 : 45 L. J. Ch. 798 ; 24 W. R. 877. . 438 

WithneU v. Garthain (1796), 6 T. R. 388 ; 1 Esp. 324 ; 3 R. R. 218 397, 792 

Witmer v. Schlatter (1830), 2 Rawle, 359 1098 

Witt V. Witt and Klindworth (1862), 3 S. & T. 143 ; 32 L. J. Mat. 179 ; 

8 L. T. 175 ; 11 W. R. 154 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 207 374 

Wogan V. SmaU (1824), 11 Serg. & R. 141 931 

Wolf V. Wyeth (1824), 11 Serg. & R. 149 354 

Wolfe V. Washburn (1826), 6 Cowen, 261 1178 

WolEE V. Koppel (1843), 5 HUl, N. T. R. 458 677 

Wolff V. Oxholm (1817), 6 M. & Sel. 92 1146 

WoUaston v. HakewiU (1841), 3 M. & Gr. 297 ; 3 Scott, N. R. 593 ; 10 

L. J. C. P. 303 296, 909 

Woltoni). Gavin (1850), 16 Q. B. 48; 20 L. J. Q. B. 73; 15 Jur. 329.... 148 

Vol. I. ends with page 635, 



CCXIV TABLE OP CASES CITED. 

PAGE 

"Wolverton Mortgaged Estates, Re (1877), 7 Oh. D. 197; 47 L. J. Ch. 127; 

37 L. T. 573 ; 26 W. R. 138 798 

"Womersley v. DaUy (1857), 26 L. J. Ex. 219 230 

Wood, Re, Ex parte Luokes (1872), L. R. 7 Ch. 302 ; 41 L. J. Bank. 21 ; 

26 L. T. 113 82 

"Wood V. Anglo-ItaHan Bk. (1876), 34 L. T. 255 1189 

Wood V. Duke of Argyll (1848), 6 M. & Gr. 932 ; 7 Soott, N. R. 885 ; 13 

L. J. C. P. 96 540 

Wood V. Beard (1876), 2 Ex. D. 30 ; 46 L. J. Ex. 100 ; 35 L. T. 866 649 

Wood V. Braddiok (1808), 1 Taun. 105 ; 9 E. R. 711 386, 488 

Wood V. Cooper (1845), 1 C. & K. 646 923, 925 

Wood V. Drury (1699), 1 Ld. Raym. 734 ; Holt, 734 1209 

Wood f. Eitz (1820), 10 Mart. 196 14 

Wood V. Jackson (1831), 8 Wend. 9 1140 

Wood V. Lake (1751), Sayer, 3 638 

Wood t). Leadbitter (1845), 13 M. & W. 843 ; 14 L. J. Ex. 161 637, 638 

Wood i>. Mackinaon (1840), 2 M. & Rob. 273 942 

Wood V. Manley (1839), 11 A. & E. 34 ; 3 P. & D. 5 ; 9 L. J. Q. B. 27 . . 638 
Wood V. Midgley (1854), 5 De a. M. & G. 41 ; 23 L. J. Ch. 553 ; 2 Eq. 

Rep. 729; 2Sm. &G. 121 670, 730 

Wood V. Peel (18441, Ex. Midd. Sitt. T. T. 1844 361 

Wood V. Priestner (1866), 4 H. & C. 681 ; L. R. 1 Ex. Ch. 66; 36 L. J. 

Ex.42 786 

Wood V. Rowcliffe (1851), 6 Ex. 407 ; 20 L. J. Ex. 285 804 

Wood V. Scarth (1855), 2 Kay & J. 33 749 

Wood V. Smith, Re City of Cambridge (1874), 43 L. J. Adm. 11 ; L. R. 5 

P. C. 451 ; 30 L. T. 439 ; 22 W. R. 578 178 

Wood V. Underbill (1847), 5 How. S. Ct. R. 1, 4 43 

Wood V. Wood (1867), L. R. 1 P. & D. 309 ; 36 L. J. P. 34 ; 15 L. T. 

693 143, 307, 709 

Woods V. Woods (1844), 4 Hare, 83 ; 14 L. J. Ch. 9 601 

Wood's Estate, Re (18^3), 2 New R. 15 ; 1 De G. J. & S. 465 ; 32 L. J. 

Ch. 400 167 

Woodbeck v. Keller (1826), 6 Cowen, 120 623, 627 

Woodbridge v. Spooner (1819), 3 B. & A. 233 : 1 Chit. R. 661 757 

Woodcock V. Houldsworth (1846), 16 M. & W. 124 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 49 . .165, 932 

Woodcraft ». Kinaston (1742), 2 Atk. 317 1019 

Woodfine, Re (1878), 47 L. J. Ch. 832 ; 38 L. T. 753 ; 26 W. R. 678 ... . 945 

Woodford v. Whiteley (1830), M. & M. 517 307 

Woodgate v. Potts (1847), 2 C. & K. 467 270 

Woodham v. Edwards (1836), 5 A. & E. 771 ; 1 N. & P. 207 ; 2 H. & W. 

443 ; 6 L. J. K. B. 38 7,8 

Woodley, Re (1864), 3 8. & T. 429 ; 33 L. J. P. 154 699 

Woodley v. Coventry (18631, 32 L. J. Ex. 185 ; 2 H. & C. 164 ; 8 L. T. 

249 ; 11 W. R. 599 ; 9 Jur. N. S. 548 545 

Woods V. Dean (1862), 32 L. J. Q. B. 1 ; 3 B. & S. 101 ; 7 L. T. 561 ; 11 

W. R. 22 521 

Woods V. Lamb (1866), 35 L. J. Ch. 309 169 

Woods V. Woods (1802), 2 Bay. 476 172 

Woodward, Re (1871), L. R. 2 P. & D. 206 ; 40 L. J. P. & M. 17 ; 24 

L. T. 40 ; 19 W. R. 448 706 

Woodward «;. Buchanan (1870), 39 L. J. Q. B. 71 ; L. R. 5 Q. B. 285; 

22 L. T. 123 229 

Woodward v. Catton (1834), 1 C. M. & R. 44 ; 6 C. & P. 489 ; 4 Tyr. 689 1006 

Woodward a. Larking (1801), 3 Esp. 286 , 552 

Woodward v. Leayitt (1871), 107 Mass. 453 616 

Woolam V. Heam (1802), 7 Ves 218 ; 6 R. R. 113 744, 750 

WooUey V. N. Lond. Ry. Co. (1869), L. R. 4 C. P. 602 ; 38 L. J. C. P. 

•317; 20 L. T. 813; 17 W. R. 660, 797 1186 

Woolway V. Rowe (1834), 1 A. & E. 114 ; 3 N. & M. 849 ; 3 L. J. K. B. 

121 510, 512, 513 

Wootley V. Gregory (1828), 2 T. & J. 536 659 

Worcester's, L'Evesque de, case (1594), Moore, F. 360 ; Poph. 84 6 

The references are to pages, iiot to paragraphs. 



TABLE OP CASES CITED. CCXY 

PAGE 

■Worlioli V. MaBsey (1605), Cro. Jao. 67 19 

Worsley v. PiUsker (1620), 2 RoU. Rep. 119 21 

Worthinston v. Grimsditoh (1845), 7 Q. B. 479 ; 15 L. J. Q. B. 52 ; 10 

Jur. 26 : 714 

Worthington v. Hylyer (1808), 4 Mass. 196 802 

Worthington v. Moore (1891), 64 L. T. 338 1211 

Worthington v. Sudlow (1862), 31 L. J. Q. B. 131 ; 2 B. & S. 508 ; 6 L. T. 

283 ; 10 W. E. 621 ; 8 Jut. N. S. 668 780 

Worthington v. Warrington (1848). 8 0. B. 134 ; 18 L. J. C. P. 350 .... 773 

Wotton, Ee (1874), 43 L. J. P. & M. 14 ; L. R. 3 P. & D. 159 699 

Wray v. Steele (1814), 2 Ves. & B. 388 ; 13 E. R. 124 666 

Wray, In re (1769, should be 1876), Ir. R. 10 Eq. 266 140 

Wright, Re (1865), 34 L. J. P. & M. 104 ; 4 S. & T. 35 699 

Wrights. CoUa (1849), 8 0. B. 150; 19 L. J. C. P. 60 1165 

Wrights. Court (1825), 2 C. & P. 232 385 

Wright V. Crookea (1840), 1 Scott, N. R. 685 747, 757 

Wright V. Doe d. Tatham (1834), 1 A. & E. 22 . . . .278, 279, 324, 326, 369-371, 

379 380 392 1113 1216 
Wright V. GoS (1856), 22 Beav. 207 ; 25 L. J. Ch. 803 ; 4 W.'r. 622 ; 2 

Jur. N. S. 481 749 

Wright V. Graham (1848), 3 Ex. 131 ; 18 L. J. Ex. 29 1039 

Wright V. Holdgate (1850), 3 C. & K. 158 101, 621 

Wright V. Lainson (1837), 2 M. & W. 739, 743 ; M. & H. 202 ; 6 Dowl. 

146 ; 6 L. J. Ex. 197 147 

Wright V. Littler (1761), 3 Burr. 1255 ; 1 W. Bl. 349 464 

Wright V. Lond. Gen. Omnibus Co. (1877), 46 L. J. Q. B. 429 ; 2 Q. B. D. 

271; 36L. T. 690; 26 W. E. 647 1130 

Wright ». Ld. Maidstone (1855), 1 K. & J. 701 ; 24 L. J. Ch. 623 ; 1 Jur. 

N. S. 1013 308 

Wright D. Mills (1859), 4 H. & N. 488 : 28 L. J. Ex. 223 ; 5 Jur. N. S. 771 84 

Wright «!. Netherwood (1793), 2 Salk. 593, n. (a); 2PhiUim. 266-277, n. (e) . . 174 
Wright ». Pearson (1869), L. E. 4 Q. B. 682; 38 L. J. Q. B. 312; 10 

B. & S. 723 ; 20 L. T. 849 ; 17 W. R. 1099 516 

Wright f. Pulham (1816), 2 Chitty, E. 121 1095 

Wright V. Rogers (1869), 38 L. J. P. & M. 67 ; L. R. 1 P. & D. 678 ; 21 

L. T. 166 ; 17 W. R. 833 697 

Wright V. Eudd (1832), cited 1 Ph. Ev. 172 398 

Wright p. Sanderson, " Times, " 28 Feb. 1884 (C. A.) 697 

Wright V. Sarmuda {see Wright u. Netherwood). 

Wright V. Shaworosa (1819), 2 B. & Aid. 501, n 32 

Wright 1). Snowe (1848), 2 De G. & Sm. 321 639 

Wright V. Stavert (1850), 29 L. J. Q. B. 161 ; 2 E. & E. 721 ; 8 W. R. 

413 ; 6 Jur. N. S. 867 682 

Wright V. Vanderplank (1856), 2 K. & J. 1 ; 25 L. J. Ch. 753 ; 8 De G. 

M. & G. 133 ; 2 Jur. N. S. 699 136 

Wright V. Wilcox (1860), 19 L. J. C. P. 333 ; 9 C. B. 660 ; 14 Jur. 

740 ^ 272 274 

Wright !;."Woodgate'(i83.5)V2 C.M. &R.'673 '; Y ly'r'. & Gr."l2;' 1 Salej '329. . ' 111 

Wright V. Wright (1831), 7 Bing. 457 696 

Wrightson v. Calvert (1860), 1 J. & H. 260 803 

Wyatt, Re (1862), 2 S. & T. 494 ; 31 L. J. P. & M. 197 ■. . 701 

Wyatt V. Bateman (1836), 7 C. & P. 586 329, 1216 

Wyatt V. Gore (1816), Holt, N. P. R. 299 618 

Wyatt V. Harrison (1832), '3 B. & Ad. 871 ; 1 L. J. K. B. 237 114 

Wyoh V. Meal (1734), 3 P. Wms. 311 495 

Wyld V. Hopkins (1846), 15 M. & W. 617 ; 16 L. J. Ex. 25 540, 541 

Wyllie V. Mott (1827), 1 Hagg. (Eco.) 34 846 

Wyndham's Divorce bill (1855), 3 Maoq. 54 376 

Wynne v. Tyrwhitt (1833), 4 B. & Ad. 376 87, 442 

Xenos v. Wiokham (1866), L. E. 2 H. L. 296 ; 36 L. J. C. P. 313 ; 16 
L. T. 880 1204 

Vol. I. ends with page 635. 



CCXVl TABLE OF CASES CITED, 

FAQS 

Tabslet V. Noble (1697), 1 Ld. Eavm. 190 496 

Tarborongh „. Bk. of England (1812), 16 East, 6 ; 14 Eev. R. 272 ; do. 

Preface v 643 

Tardley v. Arnold (1842), 10 M. & W. 145 ; 2 Dowl. N. S. 311 ; Car. &M. 

434 ; 6 Jur. 718 909 

Yates, Ex parte, Ee Smith (1858), 27 L. J. Bank. 9 ; 2 De G. & J. 191 . . 1194 

Yates ». Camsew (1828), 3 C. & P. 99 485 

Yates V. Maddan (1851), 3 Mao. & a. 532 ; 21 L. J. Ch. 24 ; 16 Jirr. 45. . 144 
Yates V. Pym (1816), 6 Taun. 446 ; 2 Marsh. 141 ; Holt, N. P. 95 .... 766, 781 

Yates V. Thomson (1835), 3 CI. & Fin. 577, 580 52 

Yea 41. Fouraker (1760-1), 2 Burr. 1099 714 

Yearsley v. Heane (1845), 14 M. & W. 322 : 3 Dowl. & L. 265 872 

Yearwood's Trusts, Ee (1877), 46 L. J. Ch. 488 ; 6 Ch. D. 545 ; 25 W. R. 461 621 

Yeatman, Ex parte (1835), 4 Dowl. 309 594 

Yeatman v. Dempsey (1861), 7 C. B. N. S. 628 ; 9 C. B. N. S. 881 ; 9 W. E. 

743 ; 7 Jur. N. S. 1245 ; 29 L. J. C. P. 177 835 

Yeats V. Yeats (1852), 16 Beav. 170 803 

Yelverton ». Yelverton (1867), L. R. 1 H. L. (So.) 218 ; 4 Macq 746 ; 10 

Jur. N. S. 1209 ; 11 L. T. 118 ; 13 W. R. 233 876 

Yeomans v. "Williams (1865), L. R. 1 Eq. 184 ; 35 !■. J. Ch. 283 639 

Yorke v. Brown (1842), 10 M. & W. 78 ; 2 Dowl. N. S. 283 ; 11 L. J. Ex. 

410 1165 

Yoter V. Sauno (1837), 6 "Watts, 166 619 

Young, Ex parte, Re Kitohin (1881), 17 Ch. D. 668 ; 50 L. J. Ch. 824 ; 45 

L. T. 90 508 

Young V. Black (1813), 7 Cranch, 566 1118 

Young V. Cawdrey (1819), 8 Taun. 734 663 

Young «!. Clare HaU (1851), 17 Q. B. 529 ; 21 L. J. Q. B. 12; 16 Jur. 81.. 446 
Young V. Cole (1837), 3 Bing. N. C. 724 ; 4 Scott, 489 ; 6 L. J. C. P. 201.. 776 

Young V. Honner (1843), 2 M. & Rob. 537 ; 1 C. & K. 51 1226 

Young V. Corp. of Leamington (1883), 8 Q. B. D. 597 ; 61 L. J. Q. B. 292 ; 

8 App. Cas. 517 ; 52 L. J. Q. B. 713 ; 49 L. T. 1 ; 31 W. R. 925 ; 47 

J. P. 660 650 

Young V. HoUoway (1895), 11 E. (April) 59 ; (1895) P. 87 ; 64 L. J. P. D. 

& A. 55; 72 L. T. 118; 43 W. R. 429 Add. [230] 

Young V. Lynch (1747), 1 "W. Bl. 27 997 

Young V. Murphy (1836), 3 Bing. N. C. 54 ; 3 Seott, 379 ; 2 Hodges, 144; 

6 L. J. C. P. 180 255 

Young V. R. (1789), 3 T. E. 98 ; 1 E. E. 660 237, 238 

Young V. Raincook (1847), 7 C. B. 310 ; 18 L. J. C. P. 193 ; 13 Jur. 639. . 89, 

93, 94 

Young ». Sohuler (1883), 11 Q. B. D. 671 ; 49 L. T. 546 730, 758 

Young V. Smith (1808), 6 Esp. 121 496 

Young V. Turing (1841), 2 M. & Gr. 603 ; 2 Scott, N. R. 752 157 

Young V. "Wright (1807), 1 Camp. 141 605, 606 

Youuge «!. Honner (1843), 2 M. & Rob. 537 ; 1 C. & K. 51 1226 

Yrisari v. Clement (1826), 3 Bing. 432 ; 11 Moore (C. P.) 308 ; 2 C. &P. 223 3 
Ystalyfera Iron Co. v. Neath atjd Brecon Ey. Co. (1873), 43 L. J. Ch. 476 • 

L. R. 17 Eq. 142 ; 29 L. T. 662 ; 22 "W. R. 149 1073 



Zaohabiab «. CoUis (1820), 3 PhiUim. 202 140 

Zichy Ferraris, Countess de v. M. of Hertford (1843), 3 Curt. 479 697 701 708 

Zouch Peer. (1807), Pari. Min. 207 409 423 

Zouch ». Clay (1671), 1 Ventr. 185 ; 2 Keb. 872 ; 2 Lev. 35 1203 1205 

Zouch V. "WilUngale (1790), 1 H. Bl. 312 ; 2 R. E. 770 39 622 

Zugaati V. Lamer (1858), 12 Moo. P. C. C. 331 6 

Zulueta V. "Vinent (1851-2), 1 De G. M. & G. 315 ' ' " ' 644 



The references are to pages, not to paragraphs. 



AMEEICAN TABLE OF CASES. 



[refekences ake to pages.] 



Abbot v. Plumbe 


122912, 


12291s 


Abbott V. Coleman 


1229^5, 


122962 


Abington v. North Bridgewater 


4121 


Acklen v. Hiukman 


978-^ 


, 97810 


Adam i'. Kerr 




122919 


Adams v. Clark 




18331 


V. Davis 




808" 


V. Field 1229", 1229i5_ 


1229*8 


V. Greenwich Ins. Co. 


257« 


V. Harrison 




6224 


V. Jones 




183M 






25718 


(/■. Lawson 




25734 


V. Lesher 




117936 


V. State 


3915", 


117939 


u. Swansea 




4274 


«. Watkins 




80823 


V. Way 


218, 


117913 


V. Wheeler 


97826, 97827 


Addams v. Seitzinger 




4525 


Adkins v. Galbraith 




35811 


Adler v. State 




2125 


Aherti v. Goodspeed 




3912 


Aiken v. Kennison 




2578 


Alabama, &c. Ins. Co. v. 


Cobb 


2121 


Alabama, &c. R. R. v. Hill 365i 


, 36518 


Alabama State Ld. Co. u 


Kyle 


18381 


Albrittin v. Huntsville 




2111 


Alderman v. People 




6221' 


Alderman and Council v. 


Fin ley 


2112 


Alexander v. Burnham 




2118 


V. Foreman 




11794* 


V. Kaiser 




978« 


V. Milwaukee 




2112 


V. Smoot 


463 


S 46321 


V. U. S. 




35821 


Alexander's Succession 




I8.32* 


Allegliany v. Nelson 




21 SI 


Allen V. Frost 


521, 522 


V. Tliaxter 




117928 


V. Watson 


6212, 


117912 


V. Yeater 




80825 


AUesbrook v. Roach 




122965 


Allison V. Barrow 




6228 


Alston V. State 




5882 


Amer. &c. Ass'n v. Dahl 




80822 


American Fire Ins. Co. u 


. Hazen 


25728 



Amer, &c. Ins. Co. v. Eosenagle 521", 

4272, 11798, II7918 

Amer, Nat. Bk. v. Bushey 216 

Ames V. McCamber 52i8, 52i5 

u. Snider 2768 

Araey v. Long 1229* 

Amidon v. Hosley 257°^ 

Anderson v. Ames 4638 

V. Fetzer 39129, 39180 

V. Long 25728 

V. Parker 427* 

V. State 4706, 470", 5882, 58310^ 58812 

Andrews v. Beck 1832* 

V. Hoxie 2126 

V. Solomon 6229 

Aneals v. People 978^2 

Angus V. Smith 978*9 

Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass. 



Hutmacher 


35816 


Annapolis, &c. R. R. u. Gantt 


2572* 


Anon. 


257'6 


Apollon, The 


2134 


Appeal of Hartranft 


62219 


Application of Jacobs 


2187 


Arayo «. Currel 


219 


Arbuckle v. Terapleton 


18328, 6226 


Archer v. Helm 


391", 39127 


Archibald v. State 


4704 


Armil v. Chicago 


39126 


Armor v. State 


25781 


Armstrong v. U. S. 


21' 


Arnold v. Arnold 


91011, 91013 


V. .Tones 


808" 


Arthur v. James 


5547, 55412 


Asli V. Marlow 


525 


Ashley v. Root 


5216 


Ashley's Adm'x v. Martin 


2131 


Ashlock V. Linder 


5548 


Atchison, &c. R. R. u. Blacksliire 2I12 


V. Cupello 


11791s 


V. Lawler 


9781, 978' 


t'. Parker 


39129 


V. Stanford 


2572* 


V. Thul 


36511, 36514 


Atkeson v. Lay 


2140 


Atkinson v. Blair 


808* 



Atlantic Ins. Co. v. Manning 



122984 



CCXVIU J 


yMEKICAiT TAI 


JLE OF CASES. 






Beferences are to pages. 




Atlas Bank v. Doyle 


27612 


Bank of Augusta u. Earle 


2183 


Att.-Gen. v. Dublin 


2125, 622 


Bank of Kentucky v. Adams Ex- 


V. HalUday 


1832' 


press Co. 


215 




27 


Bank of Newberry 


21W 


Atwater v. Schenck 


21-22 


Bank of No. Amer. v. McEIroy 91017. 


Atwood V. Barney 


46316, 46322 




91018 


V. Scott 


1831 


Bank of Nortliern Liberties !>. 


Davis 97831 


Augusta V. Windsor 


46326 


Bank of U. S. v. Dandridge 


35821 


Aulls V. Young 


2768 




117919 


Aultman v. Clifford 


80816 


Bank of Upper Canada v. Boulton 8082 


7>. Daggs 


6228 


V. Smith 


525 


Austin V. Austin 


183« 


-Bank of Utioa v. Hillard 


12293 


— — V. Heiser 


622* 


Banks v. Burnliam 


2123 


r. Holland 


183s» 


Bannon v. Aultman 


80828 


V. State 


97834 


Barber v. Merriam 


39136 


Austine v. People 


68818, 58820 


Barbour v. Watts 


117920 


Averill v. Sawyer 


8088, 80823 


Barcello v. Hapgood 


117982 


Avery v. Avery 


46327 


Barclay v. Waring 


91018 


V. Miller 


80826 


Barker v. Bradley 


80826 


Ayer v. Bell Mfg. Co. 


80816 


V. Bushnell 


5547 


Ayres v. Bane 


5542 


v. Com. 


39160 


V. Cliisum 


35821 


V. Haskell 463" 


, 46316, 46318 


V. Duprey 


97846 


V. Kuhn 


62216 


V. Hewett 


12299 


Barmby v. Plummer 


35813 


V. Watson 


97861 


Barnard v. Roane Iron Co. 


80821 






Barnes v. Harris 


6229 


Bacon v. Frisbee 


62217 


V. State 


58816 


V. Inhabitants of Charlton 39137 


V. Tronipowsky 


I22918 


V. Towne 


2578*, 391« 


Barnhart v. Fulkerth 


21 


Badart v. Foulon 


522 


Barnum v. Barnum 427^, 4273, 4276, 


Badger v. Story 


3586, 39146^ 39146 




4278, 4279 


Baeder v. Jennings 


4281 


Barr v. Barr 


80826 


Bagley v. McMickle 


18326, 35820 


Barron v. Mason 


526, 25734 


Bagley, &c. Co. v. Saranac, &o. Co. 808^ 


Barrow v. State 


39134 


Bailey v. Bailey 


978« 


Barrows v. Downs 


5216 


V. Kalamazoo Pub 


Co. 2183 


Barry v. Ryan 


122913 


Bain i: Walsh 


358" 


Bartholomew v. Farwell 


46319 


Baird v. Baird • 


8082* 


Bartlett v. Emerson 


4126 


Baker v. Gausin 


3918 


V. Patton 


4523 


V. Goldsmith 


39129 


Bartley v. People 


58826 


V. Hall 


8086 


Barton v. Dundas 


46329 


V. Hess 


5542 


Bascom v. Smith 


523 


V. Knott 


2122 


V. Toner 


358' 


V. Mich., &c. R. E. 


80811 


Bass V. Chicago, &c. R. R. 


39117 


V. Mygatt 


2128 


Bassett v. Shares 


5548 


V. Thompson 


91018 


V. Spofford 


4634 


Balbo V. People 


58816 


Basye v. State 


4709, 5881 


Balch V. Smith 


18331 


Battaglia v. Thomas 


35818, 978*5 


Baldridge v. Penland 


4635, 46311, 46318 


Battle V. Baird 


117946 


Baldwin v. Burt 


85811 


Battles V. Laudenslager 


25(26 


V. Short 


25717 


Battre v. State 


521 


V. Threlkeld 


3582» 


Baugh V. White 


8086 


V. Whitcomb 


3588 


Baxter v. Abbott 


97863 


Ball V. Gates 


4633 


V. Ellis 


18328 


Ballew V. U. S. 


11798 


V. State 


4708, 47013 


Baltimore, &c. R. R. v. 


Glenn 52i» 


Bay V. Cook 


4638, 46318 


V. Ramho 


978S9, 978«» 


Bayly's Adm. v. Chubb 


218, 5210 


V. Thompson 


97826 


Bayse v. State 


622" 


V. Woodruff 


25726 


Beach v. State 


6351 


Baltimore Steamboat Co. v. Brown 8081^ 


Beale v. Com. 


]83« 


Bank v. Bank 


978W 


Beall V. Poole 


80826 


V. Dandridge 


183«, 3582 


Beals V. See 


80821 


V. Mudgett 


I22918 


Beamer v. Darling 


62210 


■ V. Rutland 


391« 


Beard v. Boylan 


80827 


V. Zorn 


9781, 9785, 97849 


Beardsley v. Wildman 


97844, 97862 



AMEKICAN TABLE OF CASES. 



CCXIX 



References axe to pages. 



Beardstown v. Virginia 
Beasley v. People 
Beattie v. Hilliard 
Beatty v. Clement 

V. Lessee of Knowler 

Beck V. Beck 
Becker v. Holm 
Beckham v. State 
Beckman v. Beckman 
Bedford v. Flowers 
Bedingfield's Case 
Beeokman v. Montgomery 
Beemer v. Kerr 
Beery v. U. S. 
Beets V. State 
Befay v. Wheeler 
Bell V. Brewster 

V. Chambers 

D. Kendrick 



276* 
257" 
35819 

4525 
2113, 21W 



522 



89121 
5542 
9785' 
588", 58818, 58818, 58823 
4705 
18352, 39129 
1229*5 
97834 
526, 35813, 48323 
V. State 2139, 47010, 588I, 5885, 978IV 
V. Woodman 8083 

Bornman 8082" 

212, 2118 

58821, 58824 
4703 

97813, 97818 

122945 

2572 

62210 

80821 



Belleville Sav. Bk. v, 
Belmont v. Morrill 
Belote V. State 
Ben V. State 
Benaway v. Conyne 
Benedict v. Flanigan 

V. Rose 

V. State 

Benicia, &c. Works v. Estes 
Benjamin v. BUinger's Adm. 

V. Shea ' 2763 

Bennett v. State 2li9, 2573', 62223 

Benns v. State 470* 

Benoist v. Darby 3915" 

Bentley v. Ward 46313, 46321 

Benton v. Martin 80825 

Berg 0. Peterson 12292', 122938 

Bergen v. People 5889 

Bergman v. Shoudy 978i, 9788 

Berliner v. Waterloo 211° 

Bernard v. Walker 80819 

Bernheim v. Dibrell 25713 

Berscli v. State 257" 

Besson v. Southard 525 

Bethea v. Byrd 4124, 4i2» 
Beyerstedt v. Winona Mill Co. 808", 8O8I' 

Bickel V. Fasig 9IO21 

Biddis V. James 117912 

Bierhaus v. W. U. Tel. Co. 52i2 

Bigelow V. Chatterton 21' 

V. Wilson 8088 

Bigler v. Reyher 62215, 62218 
Bignall, &c. Co. 0. Pierce, &c. Co 



Billingslea v. Smith 
Billingsley v. Hiles 
Binford v. Young 
Bingham v. Bernard 
Binns V. State 
IJirch V. Hale 
Bird's Case 

Birmingham v. McPoland 
Bishop V. Jones 

V. Nesbiit 

Bissell B. Briggs 



9781 

117928 

55413 

25733, 25739, 8089 

470" 

97846 

218 

9784 

2130 

4272 
117919 



Bissell V. Edwards 11792", 117921, II7922 
Bituminous, &c. Co. v. Fulton 2112 

Bixler's Adm. v. Parker 21i3 



80828 

1834, 1835 

5881, 5888, 97827 

4271, 427', 4278, 4632' 

470' 

9104, 9108, 9107, 91022 

18325 

8082, 8083, 80818, 808i3 



Black V. Sharkey 

V. Ward 

Blackburn v. Com. 

V, Crawfords 

i\ State 

Blackwell v. State 
Blade v. Noland 
Bladen v. Wells 
Blair v. Madison Co. 

V. Seaver 

Blake v. Damon 

V. Fash 

V. Hall 

Blanchard ;;. Child 

V. Young 

Bland v. Warren 
Blatz V. Uohrbach 
Bless V. Jenkins 
Blewitt V. Boorum 
Bliss V. Brainard 

c. Johnson 

Blizzard v. Hayes 

Blocker v. Burness 

Bloom V. Cox, &c. Mfg. Co. 

Bloomington v. Shrock 

Blossom V. Griffia 

Blotcky V. Caplan 

Blount V. Kimpton 

Board of Trustees c. Misenheimer 122958 

Boardman u. Lessees of Reed 4124 

V. Westchester, &c. Ins. Co. 365" 

0. Woodman 2572' 

Bod well V. Swan 25733 

Body V. Jewson 18331 

Boehringer v. Richards Medicine Co. 39132 
Bolm Mfg. Co. u. Harrison 808^' 



91011, 91012, 91013 
3913 
3582U 
8081 
39133 
2761, 2768 
4638 

2138 

18361 
8082' 
2766 

39149 

25734 

910W 

522 

39132 



97846 
62215 



Bolds V. Woods 
Bolles V. Sachs 
Boiling V. Fannin 
Bonahan v. State 
Bondy v. Valois 
Bonelli v. Bowen 
Bonnell v. Mawha 
Bonner v. Phillips 
Bonnet xt. Glattfeldt 



3912 



46329 
58812 
6224 
9784' 
46312, 5543 

2132 

9781, 9782, 9784 



Bonsack Machine Co. v. Woodrum 

8086 
Booby V. State 62224 

Bookman v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. 2135 
Boon V. State Ins. Co. 18351 

V. Wethered's Adm. 25739, 25752 

Born V. Rosenow 97826 

V. Weathered's Adm. 25746 

Bornheimer v. Baldwin 39129 

Borum v. Fouts 6224 

Bostick V. Rutherford 25734, 25735 

Boston I'. Richardson 428i 

V. State 2120, 2121 

Bottomley v. U. S. 257" 

Boulden v. State 35812, 4705, 47013 

Bowden v. Spellman 9785 

Bowdle V. By. Co. 91025 



ccxx 



AMEEICAN TABLE OP CASES. 
References are to pages. 



Bowen v. Chase 

V. Humphreys 

V. Jones 

;;. Mo. Pac. E. K. 

Bowers v. State 
Bowersock v. Adams 
Bowman v. Hekla Fire Ins. Co. 

V. Sanborn 

Boyce v. Cheshire R. R. 
Boyd V. Ladson 

V. State 

V. V. S. 

Boyle V. State 
Brabston v. State 
Brackett v. People 
Bradberry v. State 
Bradford v. Barclay 
V. Floyd 

V. State 

Bradlej' v. Goodyear 

V. Kent 

V. M'Intosh 

Bradshaw v. Combs 
Brady v. Cassidy 
V. Page 

V. State 

V. V. S. 

V. Wilson 

Bragg V. Colwell 
Brakefield v. State 
Bramlette v. State 
Brancli v. Howard 

V. Texas Lumber Mfg. Co. 

V. Wilson 

Brand v. Brand 62213 

Brandon Mfg. Co. v. Morse 808» 

Brazier's Case 910^ 

Brennan v. Vogt 2P^ 

Brent v. State 183S 1835 

Breton v. H. B. Claflin Co. 910« 

Bretz V. Mayor, &c. of New York 21" 
Brewer v. Housatonic E. E. Co. 2761* 

V. Porch 9782' 

Brice v. Miller 3582, 808^3 

Briceland v. Com. 276' 

Brick V. Brick 8082" 

Bridger v. Ashville, &c. R. E. Co. 52', 

5214, 5216 
39132 

2138 

978", 97813 
4635 

18349 

122988 

2112 

122914 

8082" 

25724 

6225 



4522 

8081" 

1229" 

2110 

62213 

117943 

1179W 

122928 

25726 

463S 

91021 

2574 

4708, 47017 

4704 

21« 

39125 

9784' 

2137 

58825 
4638 
91018 
6222" 
808', 80823 
80828 

2135 

62210 
58825 
427" 
12294' 
470" 

6221 
80824 

4278 



Bridges !>. Hyatt 
Briffltt V. State 
Briggs V. Rafferty 

V. Georgia 

V. Herrey 

V. U. S. 

V. Whipple 

Brigham v. Palmer 

Bright V. Knight 

Brighthope R. E. v. Rogers 

Britton v. Lorenz 

Broad Street Hotel Co. v. Weaver's 

Adm. 21" 

Brobston v. Cahill 1229=2, 122986 

Brock V. Com. 470', 47015 

V. Milligan 910", 91012 

BroUey v. Lapham 978=" 



Bromage v. Rice 


122968 


Bronner v. Loomis 


12296' 


Brooke v. Jordan 


358'", 358" 


Brooks V. Acton 


39130 


V. Clay 


4274 


Broschart v. Tuttle 


5549, 554" 


Broughton v. Null 


80818 


Brown v. Burrus 


97858 


ji. Com. 


4707, 470" 


V. Deacon 


80828 


V. Edson 


117931 


V. Foster 


36515 


V. Griffith 


117948 


V. Lazarus 


4278 


V. Luehrs 


25745 


V. Mitchell 


117910 


V. Mooers 


2573', 97854 


V. Morgan 


80824 


V. Payson 


6225 


V. People 


391*7 


V. Piper 2136, 2139_ 21*0, 39138 


V. Prude 


39129 


V. Sheppard 


39132 


V. State 4701", 588i, 588*, 588«, 


91021, 97818 


97834, 97835 


V. Williams 


46318 


V. Wood 35819, 6221, 


97828, 978-'^ 




12292* 


V. Wright 


52", 5213 


Browne v. Phila. Bank 


215 


Browning v. Gosnell 


37846, 122947 


Broyles v. State 


5545 


Brubaker v. Taylor 978^1 


97848, 97861 


Bruce y. Priest 


25727 


Brundred v. Del. Hoyo 


11794 


Bruson v. Clark 


2121, 2134 


Bryan v. Beckley 


2137 


V. Forsyth 


11794 


V. Wear 


117938 


Bryce Lorillard v. Ins. Co. 


80824 


Bubster v. State 


58818 


Buchanan v. Moore 


4124 


Buckingham v. Roar 


6222, 91019 


Buckley v. Buckley 


9783* 


Buckmaster v. Kelley , 


622" 


Buddee v. Spangler 


5542 


Buell V. State 


2123 


V. Warner 


2114 


Buford V. Bostick 


11795 


V. Tucker 


2130 


Bulger V. Eoss 


35822, 39139 


Bull V. Com. 


47014 


V. Loveland 


1229* 


BuUard v. Lambert 


978*6 


V. Pearsall 9782' 


97828, 97831 


BuUinger v. People 


978", 978i» 


Bulman v. Andrews 


62214 


Bunnell v. Butler 


2576* 


Burbank v. Dennis 


9782 


Burch V. Harrell 


35822 


Burdick v. Hunt 


62228 


Burgess u. Burgess 


122929 


Burgin v. Chenault 18318, 122921. 12292* 


Burk V. Andis 


97818 


Burke v. Delaney 


80827 



AMEEICAI>r TABLE OP CASES. 
References are to pages. 



CCXXl 



Burke v. Miller 

V. Miltenberger 2130 

V. Ray 8081°, gosu 

Burleson v. Collins 1179*8 

V. Goodman 46321, 46322^ 4632*, 5543 

Burlev v. German-Am. Bank 4632' 
Burlington, &c. Ey. Co. v. Dey 21'6 
Burnett v. Henderson 2120 
V. Simpkins 



■ ». State 

V. Thompson 

Burnham v. Aver 

I'. Webster 

Burns v. Fay 

V. Kerr 

Burr V. Harper 

V, Kase 

V. Sim 

Burrell v. State 
Burt V. State 
Burtners v. Keran 
Burton v. Blin 

V. Driggs 

V. Morrow 

Bush V. Com. 

V. Robinson 

Bustin V. Rogers 

Buswell Trimmer Co. u. Case 

Butler V. Collins 

V. Com. 

V. Smith 

V. Watkins 

Butrick v. Tilton 
Buttriok V. Allen 
Butts V. Smartwood 
Buzard v. McAnulty 
Byass v. Sullivan 
Byers v. McMillan 



257' 

12291*, 122919 

12299, 12292', 122928 

21" 

463* 

554» 

122929 

3582* 

1833*, 18336 

25737, 978M 

391*', 391*8 

80821 

27612 

358", 1179** 

808' 

9101* 

- 808* 

4635 

257*5 

257" 

58821 

8082' 

2671' 

42711 

11791* 

91013 

5541* 

12295 

80816 



■ V. Wallace 
Byrd «. Campbell 



4272, 4278, 4279, 11795, 
11795 
80825 



Cabiness v. Holland 554' 

Cabot V. Given 358" 

Cadden v. Am. Steel Barge Co. 391*3 

Cady V. State 58821 

V. Walker 6225 

Caha V. U. S. 213 
Cain V. State 212i, 588', 5881'', 5832*, 58827 



Caldwell v. Davis 

V. Melvedt 

V. Richmond R. R, 

Calhoun v. Richardson 

n. Ross 

Calkins i\ State 
Call V. Dunning 
Cameron v. Blackraan 

V. Peck 

Camp V. Simmons 

V. State 

Campbell v. Bannister 
V. Dearborn 

V. State 



6228 

6221" 

2112 

8081", 80821 

117915 

3653 

122912 

215 

36815 

8085 

25739, 257*' 

26738, 25738 

80819 



365", 4702, 470', 470" 
47013, 5888, 91022, 91026 



Campbell v. Woodstock Iron Co. 

Canfield v. Thompson 

Cantey v. Piatt 

Cantitfe v. Septor 

Card V. State 

Carder v. Primm 

Cargill V. Atwood 

Carman v. Dunham 

Carmon v. State 

Carnes v. Piatt 

Carpenter v. Dame 

V. Dexter 

V. Wall 

V. Willey 

Carr v. GriflSn 

V. Miner 

V. Moore 

V. State 

Carrico v. W. Va. &e. R. R. 
Carrington v. Holabird 
Carroll v. Norwood 

V. State 

Carskadden v. Poorman 
Carson v. Smith 
Carter v. Seals 

V. Com. 

V. Doe 

B. Jackson 



122935 

1179*3 

122959 

122919 

25716 

97823, 978*8 

463* 

4635 

2138 

62211 

35816 

218, 2116 

978*9 

18328, 9783* 

5542 

3589 

97853 

3913 

3656 

910" 

12292* 

978*2 

4271* 

211 

3916, 391*5 

25732 

122921, 122923, 12292* 

1229** 

V. State 9106 9106, giot, 9IO22, 9102*, 

97853 

V. Tinicum Fishing Co. 183*8, 4278 

Cartier v. Troy Lumber Co. 1832' 

Carville v. Westford 978*8 

Gary v. State 21" 

Casat V. State 391*i 

Case V. Case 183*", 8O821 

V. Mayor of Mobile 21i6 

V. McGee 117920, 11792' 

V. Perew 2128, 2129 

V. Phoenix Bridge Co. 808", 8O8I' 

Cassidy v. McFarland 21*" 

Castello V. Castello 622i 

Castle V. Belard 257", 257" 

Castner v. Sliker 3913 

Gates V. Kellogg 554" 

Catlett V. Pacific Ins. Co. 1179' 

Caujolle V. Ferrie 18382, 4272, 42712 

Caulfleld v. Hermann 808" 

Cavender v. Guild 52" 

Cawthorn v. Haynes 391*" 

Cayuga, The 8O811 

Central, &c. Co. v. Gamble 2121 

Central Land Co. &c. o. Calhoun 2123 
Central R. R. v. AUmon 978*6 

Chadron v. Glover 365ii 

Chaffe V. Mackenzie 554' 

Chaffee v. Taylor 122935 

Chaffee & Co. o. U. S. 46328, 46330, 46331, 
46332, 4683* 
Chahoon v. Com, 622' 

Chamberlain v. Bradley 1179*', 1179*8 

V. Cliamberlain 4271, 427', 427", 42712 

V. Enfield 257*2 

V. Sands 9782' 

V. Smith 808' 



ccxxu 



AMERICAN TABLE OP CASES. 
References are to pages. 



25736, 2673' 

8084, 117936 

1179« 



Chamberlain v. Torrence 

Chamberlin v. Ball 

Chambers v. Jones 

Chambless v. State 

Champion v. Munday 

Chandler v. Le Barron 1229« 122966 

V. Von Roeder 52', 628 

Chanoine v. Fowler 21'' 

Chapin v. Dobson 808', 808is, 80816, 80822, 



9786 

S91S7 

1229*, 1229' 

80813 

5212 

4276, 42712, 42713 

2673', 978M 

8081" 



V. Xapham 

0. Marlborough 

Chaplain v. Briscoe 
Chaplin v. Baker 
Chapman v. Brewer 

V. Chapman 

V. Cooley 

V. Sutton 

Charlotte v. Chouteau 529, 5210, 521*, 52i6 
Charter Oak Life Ins. Co. v. Gisborn 8085 
Chase v. Lowell 3916 

Chattanooga R, R. Co. 0. Clowdis 391*3 
Cheatham v. State 635*, 6358 

V. Young 11791* 

Cheeny v. Arnold 97826 

Cheever v. Brown 46322 

V. Congdon 39130 

V. Wilson 21" 

Cheney v. Cheney 5546 

Cherokee Packet Co. v. Hilson 9786* 

Cherry v. Baker 2122 

Chesapeake Bank v. Swain 212' 

Chesapeake Ohio Canal Co. v. B. & 0. 

Ry. Co. 213, 2110, 2120 

Chester v. Wilhelm 97829 

Chew V. Farmers' Bank , 622*, 622" 

Chicago Lumbering Co. v. Hewitt 463i' 
Chicago, &c. R. E. v. Artery 978*', 978** 

V. Becker 3912* 

V. Champion 2128, 2136 

V. Coal & Iron Co. 9783* 



V. Ellis 

V. GrilEth 

Chick V. Sisson 

Child V. Kingsbury 

Childs V. Merrill 

Chirac v. Reinicker 

Chisholm v. Sheldon 

Choisser v. People 

Christian v. Columbus, &c. R. R. 

Christmas v. Russell 

Chumasero v. Gilbert 



6221 

97868 

3912 

4128, 4129 

18823, 6228, 6221' 

622*, 62210, 62216 

122920 

18331 

978*' 

117919 

529 



Church V. Hubbart 216, 11792^ 11799^ 117915 
Church in Brattle Square v. BuUard 183*8 
Churchill v. FuUiam 5546 

Churchman «. Smith 46323 

Cicero v. State 588* 

Cincinnati, &c. R. R. v. Clifford 21i* 

V. Grames 212* 

City Bank of Macon r. Kent 8O811 

City Council of Montgomery W.Mont- 
gomery, &c. Plankroad 213* 
City of Alleghany v. Nelson 21'* 
City of McPherson v. Nichols 21" 
City of St. Louis v. Roche 21i6 



21", 2116 
5216 
8081 
2766 
5547 
97829 

6366 
97832 

365* 

62221 

122933 

6548 

80820 

80815 

2762, 2768, 27610, 412" 

1831', 12292* 

1179*6 



City of Winona v. Burke 
Clanton v. Barnes 
Clapp V. Banking Co. 

V. Ellington 

V. Foster 

V. Peck 

V. State 

Clark V. Bond 

V. Bradstreet 

V. Field 

y. Freeman 

V. Grand Trunk 

V. Haney 

V. Hayward 

V. Hills 

V. Owens 

V. Perdue 

„. Sanderson 122920 

V. State 470* 

Clarke v. Bank 117913 

V. Canfield 18336 

V. Courtney 4282 

V. Kelsey 8088 

V. Magruder 46331 

Clator V. Otto 8082 

Clegg K.-Levy 1179'« 

Cleland v. Applegate 46322 

Clem V. State 1836 

Clemens v. Conrad 97889, 97340 

Clement v. Cureton 2i 

z.. Packer 4122,412* 

Clements v. Hunt 427* 

V. Kyles 4125, 4126, 41210 

V. McGinn 9108 

V. Moore 2762, 276" 

Clemons v. State 58821 

Cleveland v. Burnham 80826 

Cleveland, &c. R. R. v. Brown 39180 

V. Mara 39126 

!'. Perkins 

V. Wynant 

Cliquot's Champagne 
Coale V. Hannibal, &c. R. R. 
Coan V. Flagg 
Coapstick v. Bosworth 
Coates V. Sulau 
Cobb V. Boston 
Cobleigh v. McBride 

V. Young 

Coder v. Stotts 
Codman v. Caldwell 
Cody V. Conly 
Coffin V. Bucknam 

V. Grand Rapids, &c, 

r. Vincent 

Coffman v. Niagara, &o. Ins. Co. 36818 
Cogswell V. Dolliver 463', 46322 



2]S6 

39161 
25725 
11793 



257*6, 267*8 

9781, 9782, 9781° 

39129 

18881, 18346 



4636 

122982, 122936 

4625 

Co. 27612 

9788 



Cohen v. Cohen 
Coit V. Millikin 
Coker v. Hayes 

V. Scheiffer 

Colburn !'. Groton 
Cole V. Cole 

V. Com. 

V. Dial 



257* 

212, 11792 

62228, 97865 

9785* 

5548, 55410, 5881, 68810 

66410, 6228 

257* 

4632, 4636 



AMERICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
Beferences are to pages. 



cexxiii 



Cole V. Fall Brook Coal Co. 365', 3659 


Com. V. Dowing 


117937 


V. Hadley 


80824 


V. Eastman 


1229**, 1229*7, 1229*9 




808' 


V. Eddy 


2766, 27613 


u. Lake Shore, &o. R. R. 18327, 978« 


V. Emery 


35812 


V. State 


4701° 


V. Fenno 


218* 


Colegrove v. N. Y. 


'&c. E. R. 528 


V. Ferrlgan 


25711, 25712 


Coleman v. Com. 


52', 91021, 91025 




2183 


V. Frazier 


452', 4529, 45210 


V. Flood 


588W 




257" 


V. FoUansbee 


97813 


V. Soutliwick 


89129 


V. Ford 


9786, 9788, 978W 


V. State 


978«, 122912, 1229" 


V. Funai 


5545 


Coleman's Case 


9103, 910* 


V. Galligan 


97839 


CoUagan v. Burns 


3918, 3918 


V. Gay 


5541 


CoUette V. Weed 


80815 


V. Goodnow 


97853 


Collier v. Coggins 


554' 


V. Gray 


526 


V. Simpson 


I229M 


v. Griffin 


6223 


V. State 


4705 


V. Hackett 


3911", 39119, 391*2 


Collins V. Corson 


80820 


V. Hall 


25711 


V. N. Y. Central, &c. R. R. 2572" 


V. Haney 


4705, 4709 


V. Robinson 


622' 


V. Hanlon 


58812 


V. Stanfield 


80828 


V. Hardy 


25729 


V. Waters 


.39186 


V. Hawkins 


978*8 


Collins Bros. Drug Co. v. Graddy 46318 


V. Hay den 


1179**, U79*9 


Colquitt V. State 


3918 


V. Heath 


27614 


Colton, &c. Co. V. Swartz SOS^ 


V. Hill 


2183 


Columbia Planing Mill Co. v. Ins. Co. 554' 


V. Holmes 


2578, 6355 


Columbia, &c. R. R 


. V. Hawthorne 528 


V. Hourigan 


978*5 


Columbus Omnibus Co. v. Semmes 218* 


V. Howe 


58812 


Combs V. Com. 


35812 


);. Hudson 


9782' 




978«, 97852, 97853 


V. Hutchinson 


910*, 9106 


Comer v. State 


910' 


V. Jackson 


25716 


Commercial Bank 


V. Dunham 12292 


V. James 


58823, 97825 


Commissioners v. Leggett 3913*, 39138 


V. Jeffries 


18353 


V. Verbarg 


554' 


V. Jefes 


97819 


Com. V. Abbott 


257^ 


V. Johnson 


257*, 58825 


V. Anthes 


521, 523 


V. Keith 


91021 


V. Bean 


978*5 




25735 


V. Billings 


97882 




5885 


V. Blood 


183**, 85822 


V. King 


2134 




97889 


V. Kipling 


635* 




58828 


V. Knapp 


58811, 58821 


V. Bosworth 


635*, 6355, 635' 


V. Kneeland 


2125 


V. Bradford 


5883 


V. Lawler 


25753, 2575* 


V. Brown 


588*, 5885, 978", 97822 


V. Lynes 526, 527, 9106_ 9107, 9108, 


V. Burke 


91012 




91022 


V. Campbell 


257*, 5882 


V. Marzynski 


2125, 2137 


V. Carey 


47018, 9106, 9107, 9108 


V. Matthews 


4709, 47017, 47041 




4705 


V. McGorty 


18329 




452' 


■ V. McGrath 


18339 




97831 


V. McKie 


2766 


>j. Chase 


6855, 117949, 117950 




521 


V. Choate 


2182, 25720, 276' 


V. Merriam 


2576' 


V. Churchill 


257*' 


V. Minor 


2761* 


V. Clark 


5883, 1229*8 


V. Morgan 


97837 


V. Cleary 


622* 


V. Morrell 


97833 


V. Coe 525, 2579, 1229", 1229*5, | 


V. M'Pike 


39119, 39119, 391*2 




1229*8 


V. MuUins 


527 


V. Cooper 


47012, 47013 


V. Murphy 


257*7, 91020 


V. Corkin 


2578, 25729 


V. Myers 


5881*. 58815, 58817 


V. Coy 


58815 


V. Nagle 


25732 


V. Cuffee 


5885, 58815, 58819 


V. Nefus 


122928, 122929, 12294* 


V. Culver 


526, 58826, 58827, 588-28 


V. Nott 


5881* 


V. Curtis 


978*0 


V. O'Brien 


25729 


r. Dam 


2183 


V. Peckham 


2138 


V. Desmond 


2120 


V. Phillips 


117935 



CCXXIV 



Com. V. Pollard 

V. Pope 

V. Porter 

V. Reynolds 

V. Roberts 

V. Robinson 

V. Russell 

V. Ryan 

V. Samuel 

V. Sanborn 

V. Seott 

V. Sego 

i: Shepherd 

V. Silcox 

V. Smith 



AMERICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
References are to pages. 



6351 

368* 

621 

5883 

391", 47010, 47012, 47015, 

47018 

527, 2571", 25716, 25720 



25742 

2763 

688S 

25720, 36616 

5881^ 5882' 

62226 

4709 

58815, 58817, 58826, 91012, 

978« 

391S2 

97830, 97840 

18337, 470^, 47010, 9781s 

2766 

588«, 5885 



■' V. Sturtivant 

V. Sullivan 

V. Thompson 

V. Towle 

V. Trefethen 

V. Vose 

c. Webster 2573", 36513, 30520, 122935 

i: Welch 358* 

V. Welsh 9782' 

V. Wentz 62226 

II. Wheeler 2121 

V. White 25710 

V. Whittaker 18323 

V. Williams 526 

Commissioners v. May 21-'2 

Comparet v. Jernegan 117912 

Comstock V. Hadlyme Ecclesiastical 

Society 276', 276", 391*o 

V. Smith 218*, 978" 

V. State 39130 

Condit V. Blackwell 529 

Confederation Life Ass'n of Canada 

V. O'Donnell 4525 

Congar ;;. Chicago, &c. R R. 97833, 97334 
Congdon v. Howe Scale Co. 
Conkey v. People 
Connell v. Vanderwerken 
Conner v. State 
Conn. V. Mead 

V. Penn. 

Conn. &c. Ins. Co. v. Schwenk 



358* 
25736, 257*2 
808" 

2122 
62223 

4126 
46328 



V. Smith 

Conrad v. Griffey 
Consaul v. Sheldon 
Consequa v. Willings 
Conway v. State 



18327 

978*9 

35823, 97852, 97865 

117910 

5545, 97831 



Conwell V. Springfield, &c. R. R. 8O822 
Conyers v. State 2763 

Cook V. Ashmead 40315 

V. Brown 978*8 

V. First Nat. Bank 12295* 

V. Grange 6222 

V. State 58812, 07816, 97816, 978I8, 

97824 

V. Union R. R. Co. 523 

V. Wood 1179'* 

Cooke V. Wondrow 122910, 122918 

Coon V. People 



Coon V. Swan 
Coonrod v. Madden 
Cooper V. Dedrick 

V. Morrell 

V. State 

Copes V. Pearce 
Cornelius v. Com. 
Cornett v. Williams 
Cornwall v. State 
Corse V. Peck 
Corsen v. Dubois 
Corser v. Paul 
Cortland Mfg. Co. v. 
Costelo V. Crowell 



6225 



46312 

9781, 97810 

4271 

97852 

35813, 11794a 

58812 

8082, 8083 

1229* 

554*, 5545, 554', 5541* 

Piatt 97810 

2573, 4632', 1229**, 

1229*9 

808" 



Couch V, Woodruff 

Coulter V. Am. &c. Ex. Co. 9782', 97830 

Count Joannes v. Bennett 35820 

Countryman v. Bunker 46315, 45321 

County of Johnson v. Wood 808' 

Coveney v. Tannahill 6228 

Covert V. Hertzog 427io 

Covington Drawbridge Co. v. Shep- 



herd 
Cowan V, Abbott 

V. Sapp 

Cowden v. Reynolds 
Cowley V. People 
Cox V. Eayres 

V. Jones 

V. Morrow 

V. People 

7). Peterson 

V. Rust 

V. State 



Cozzens v. Higgins 
Crafts V. Com. 
Craig V. Brown 

V. Proctor 

V. State 

Cramer v. Burlington 



21", 18319 
80811 
80810 
9782' 

2185 

97826, 97826, 9782' 

117922 

218, 219, 529, 5210, 6212 

58816 

80811 

1179*8 

3911, 3912, 3918^ 39144, 

41210 

2135 

6356, 8351, 97850 

117912, 117923 

2766 

257*6, 25752, 39115 

62226 



8082 

18321 

4271, 42710 

1179*3 

18336 

122966 

46338 

6226, 62211, 12295 

6222 



Crane v. Elizabeth Library Ass'n 

V. Lessee of Morris 

Craufurd v. Blackburn 
Crawford v. Branch Bank 

V. Elliott 

Cresswell «. Jackson 
Creswell v. Slack 
Crosby v. Berger 
Crose V. Rutlsdge 
Crosman v. Euller 
Cross V. Bell 

V. Cross 

V. Riggins 

Crouch V. Eveletli 
Crouse i'. Holman 
Crow V. Watkins 
Crowe V. Colbeth 
Crowninshield v. Crowninshield 

Crozer v. New Chester Water Co. 

Crump V. Com. 
Crusen i-. State 



18326 
6222S 
6225, 62212 
39181 
183S2 



5541 
2768, 
2761* 
3586, 
8586 
4701 
6362 



AMERICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
Keferences are to pages. 



Crutcher v. Muir 808ii* 

Crystal Ice Mfg. Co. v. San Antonio 

Ass'n 978» 

Cuddy V. Brown 4271, 4272, 427' 

Cudney v. Cudney 391*'' 

Cullmans v. Lindsay 80822 

Culver V. Marks 463^ 4633* 

V. Scott, &o. Lumber Co. 978^ 

Cumberland, &c. Ins. Co. v. Giltinan 358", 

368'^2 

Cumberland, &c. R. R. Co. v. Mau- 

gans 52* 

Cummings v. Nichols 46313 

V. Stone 213* 

Cunliffe v. Sefton 122912, 122919 

Cunningliam y. State 257«, 257« 

Curren v. Crawford 4631, 4632' 

Currie v. Stairs 427^ 

Currier v. Gale ISS^i, 452^, 4529 

Curry v. Raymond 1179''3 

Curtis V. Aaronson 4122, ^i2S 

V. State 257' 

«. Strong 91011,91012 

Curtiss V. State 910* 
Cushing V. Nantasket Beach R. R. 1179' 

V. Rice 80821 

Custeau v. St. Louis, &c. Co. 808^ 

Cutter V. Carutliers 2122 

V. State 1838 

Cuvillier v. Browne 554i* 

Cuyler v. Ferrill 213° 



Dabnet v. Mitchell 


91016 


Dade v. jEtna Ins. Co. 


35818 


Daggett V. Shaw 


4123, 4127 


V. Willey 


41211 


Daily V. N. Y. &c. R. R. 


4703 


V. State 


2127 



Dakota v. O'Hare 122931, 1229=2, 122953 
Danforth v. Tenn., &c. B. R. 358^ 



Daniels v, Woonsocket 
Danville, &c. Plank-Road 

State 
Darby v. Roberts 
Darling v. Hitchcock 
Darrovv v. Pierce 
Davenport v. Cummings 
V. McKee 



554', 5549 
Co. V. 

21" 

18327, 654' 

219 

8589 

21 

9781, 9782, 9781" 

V. Ogg 9781', 97818, 97822, 97821 

Davidson v. Arsineau 97831 

V. Nicholson 276ii 

V. Peticolas 2122 

V. State 9105, 910T 91022 

V. Young 80829 

Davie v. Briggs ISS*! 

Davis V. Alston 1229', 122913 

V. Bank of Fulton 21i8 

V. Best 2119 

V. Byrd 97813 

V. Canada Farmers' Mut. Ins. 

Co. 910", 91018 

i;. Cook 97823 

V. Crookston, &c. Co. 8O828 

V. Dunham 12292 



Davis V, Franke 

V. Fredericks 

V. Hopkins 

V. McEnaney 

V. McSherry 

V. Pearson 

V. Rhodes 

V. Roby 

V. Sanford 

V. Sigourney 

. State 



CCXXV 



25739, 257*3 

122952 

80819 

2123 



Dawson v. Dawson 

V. Mayall 

Day V. Cooley 

V. De Cousse 

V. Moore 

V. Stickney 

Deacon v. Sclireve 

Dean v. Stone 

De Arman v. State 

De Baker v. So. Cal 

Dreary v. Poirier 

De Celis v. U. S. 

De Haven v. De Haven 



122922, 122924 

117932, 1179*3 

97852 

46.3*. 4635, 463', 46318 

35823 

35822, 39132, 97829, 97345 



2122 

4271 
97831 

2140 

117933, 117940 
97852 
62224 

117928 

257*0 
R. R. 2134 

978*3 
2131 
4271, 4273, 42711, 
42712, 97823, 97836 
De' Jarnette v. McDaniel 18350 

Delafield v. Hand 215, 117916 

Delano v. Jopling 21' 

De la Rosa v. State 21i8 

De Lavalette v. Wendt 80826 

Delaware, &e. R. R. v. Converse 523 

Demerritt v. Randall 3652, 3653 

Demoney v. Walker 39129 

Dempsey v. Kipp 8O8I 

Den V. M'AUister 35818 

Denmark, Griswold v. Pitcairn 212 

Dennett v. Dow 9782', 97332 

Denning v. Roome 11791* 

Dennis v. Weekes 391*o 

Dennison v. Miner 5541* 

Denton v. Peters 80826 

V. State 39135 

Denver, &c. R. R. v. Wilson 5542, 97810 
Denver Tramway Co. v. Owens 62215 
Derk v. Northern Central B. R. 97838 
Deshon v. Merchants' Ins. Co. 97825 

Des Moines Savings Bank u. Col- 



fax Hotel Co. 
Despau v. Swindler 
Detroit, &c. R. B. 

burg 
Deuser v. Hamilton 
Devine v. Burleson 
Devlin v. Crocker 
Devoto V. Com. 
Dewees v. Colorado Co. 
DeWolf V. Strader 



5544 

2124 

V. Van Stein- 

52*, 97833 
62211 
2122 
97854 
25710 
2118 
6226 



Diamond v. Northern, &c. R. B. 25724 

Dicken v. Winters 46313, 49324 

Dickerson v. State 6882, 58815 

Dickinson v. Glenney 80825 

Dickson ;•. Waldron 9102* 

Diehl V. Bodgers 910=1 

Dietrich v. Mitchell 6223 

Diggins' Estate, In re 122923 



CCXXVl 



AMERICAN TABLE OE CASES. 
References are to pages. 



Dillard v. Scruggs 3916 

Dillingham v. Snow 4121" 

Dillon V. Howe 35812 

V. Mattox 1179" 

Dimick v. Downs 257" 

Dinckler v. Baer 808=' 

Disraukes v. State 391' 

Ditch V. Vollhardt 808M 

Division of Howard Co. 21^ 

Dixon V. NiecoUs 2129 

y. State 4709, 47012 

Dixon-Woods Co. v. Phillips Glass 

Co. 8082 

Dobbins v. Blanchard 808* 

■ Dobson V. Cothran 97846 

Doctor Leyfield's Case 358' 



Dodge V. Kiene 

V. State 

Doe V. Benyon 

V, Blackman 

V. Eslava 

V. Eord 

V. Newton 



808" 

6352 

122922 

2120 

219 
39180 
122958, 12298", 122961, 
122963, 122966 

V. Reagan 978*9 

V. Suckermore 122961 

!i. Wilson 122967 

Doe d. Arnold v. Auldjo 4276, 427" 

Doe d. Dunlap v. Servos 427* 

Doe d. Hagerman v. Strong 18386 

Doe d. Maclem v. TurnbuU 122922 

Doe d. Perry v. Newton 1229*8 

Doherty v. Hill 8086 

Dole V. Wilson . 218 

Doles V. State 39123 

Dolph V. Barney 21* 

Donahoo v. Scott 978« 

Donkle u. Kohn 9101* 

Donnelly v. State 391«, 470" 47016, 9788*, 

97836 
Doolin V. Com. 
Doon V. Donaher 

V. Ravey 

Dorr V. Tremont Bank 
Dorsey v. Clapp 
Doty V. Smith 
Doud w. Reid 
Dougherty v. McManus 
Douglas V. Leighton 
Douglass V. Hart 

V. Mitchell 

Douthitt V. Stinson 
Dow V. Tuttle 
Dowd V. Watson 
Dowlen V. State 
Downer v. Rowell 
Dowtain v. Connellee 
Doyle V. Village of Bradford 



470" 

12291 

55412 

2761* 

25738 

46312 

122968 

391* 

9786 

46319 

18321 

2132 

808* 
1833* 

39188 

97811, 97812 

39129 

211*, 2120 

Drake v. Glover 52i6 

V. State 36520, 39ii3_ 4706 

Draper v. Draper 9106, 9106, 910' 
V. Inhabitants of Hatfield 554', 

554"i, 55411 
Drew V. Sutton 39136 

Driscoll V. People 391' 



Drohn v. Brewer 
Drunimond v. Hopper 
Drumright v. State 
Dubois V. Baker 

V. Fanteaux 

Ducker v. Whitson 
Duck wall V. Weaver 
Ducoign V. Shreppel 
Dudley v. Grayson 

V. McCluer 

V. Sumner 

Duffy !i. People 



Duke of Cumberland v. Graves 



97885 

1832* 

588* 

3658, 122986 

2111 

97826 

122915 

4635 

1179*1 

25728 

122919 

521, 58821, 58828 



97830, 



Dumas v. State 
Dunbar v. Marden 

V. U. S. 

Duncan v. Beard 

V. Freeman 

Dunham v. Riley 
Dunlap V. Dauglierty 

V. Waldo 

Dunn V. Altman 



18388, 

183'* 

47010, 47015 

I22916, 122918 

35818 

18318, 122920, 122921, 

122922, 12292* 

II798S 

12298 

117932 

117928 

978*3 



V. State 365^ 391*', 391*8, 4709, 5889 
Dunnell v. Sowden 1229"'2 

Du Pont V. Davis 427* 

Dupoyster v. Gagani 4276, 42713 



Duree v. Brown 




2122 


Duren v.. Houston, &c. 


R. Co 


219 


Durfee v, Abbott 




46328 


Durgin n. Danville 




18328 


Durkee v. Leland 




12296 


V. Vt. Central R. 


R. 


35816 


Durkheimer v. Heilne 


r 


46311 


Durkin «. Cobleigh 




80815, 80824 


Durr V. Chase 




8085 


Dutillet V. Blanchard 




1179* 


Dutton V. Woodman 




9785* 


Dwelling, &c. Ins. Co 


f. Shaner 8082 


Dwelly V. Dwelly 




910", 91019 


Dyer v. Fredericks 




3582* 


V. Last 




21-28 


V. Morris 




97820 


Eagan v. State 




2188 


Eagle V. Emmet 




18335, 18386 


Eames v. Eames 




18382 


Earl V. Tupper 




.39186 


Earle v. Earle 




3918* 


V. Rice 




8082' 


Early v. Com. 




58816, 58818 


Eason v. Chapman 




257*^ 25760 


East Brandywine, &c. R. R. v. 


Ranck 5542 


Easterday v. Kilhorn 




91012, 9101' 


East Line, &c. R. R. u. 


Scott 


25786, 257*8 


Eastman v. Martin 




4278, 4279 


t'. Moulton 




4638 


V. Railway Co". 




5541* 


V. Roland 




80828 


V. Shaw 




80826 


East Tennessee, &c. R 


R. V. 


Maloy 4708 


V. Stewart 




2762 


Eastwood V. People 




36518 


Eaton V. Hall 




1179** 



AMERICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
Befereuces are to pagee. 



CCXXVU 



Eaton V. Jervis 

V. Talmadge 

Ebersole v. Kankin 
Eboru r. Zimpelman 
Eby V. Winters 
Eckel V. Eukel 



1229^5 

4271, 427", 42712 

622fi 

3582^, 1229", 1229°5 

1179« 

I8.327 



Ecker v. First Nat. Bank of Windsor 2129 
Eckerly v. Alcorn 18350 

Eckford 0. Berry SOS^ 

Ector V. Welsli 5543 

Eddy V. Gray 3655 

Edelen v. Gough 1229", 1229-^8 



Edes V. Board man 




623 


Edwards v. Common Council 


365S 


1'. Jones 




1179^3 


V. Ottawa K. Nav. Co. 




25728 


V. San Jose, &c. Co. 




2133 


V. Warner 




25718 


Eel River Draining Ass'n v 


Topp 


21" 


Eiile, Estate of 




2762 


Ehrisman v. Scott 


978 


, 97812 


Eiland v. State 




5888 


Bilert v. Green Bay, &o. R. 


R. 


627 


Eisenlord v. Cluni 


427 


, 42711 


Eldridge v. Knott 




183« 


V. State 




2677 


Elkins V. McKean 




3919 


Ellicott V. Pearl 


4123, 978-27 


Elliott V. Dycke 




43629 


V. Peirsol 


4271 


, 42713 


V. Van Buren 3583, 3538, 39135 


Ellis V. Huff 




117944 


V. Park 




2126 






2119 


V. Smith 




122913 


V. State 




526 


Ellis's Estate, In re 




117920 


EUmaker v. Buckley 


97851 


, 97835 






8083 


EUmore v. Mills 




117911 


Ellswortii V. Potter 




978" 


Elmer v. Fessenden 




341*2 


Elmondorffu. Carmichael 




122925 


Elofrson v. Lindsay 




80825 


Elsenrath v. Kallraeyer 




122961 


Elwell V. Mersick 




358" 


V. Walker 




35824 


Elwood V. Flannigan 


2115, 2117 


Emery v. Berry 




117912 


V. Twombly 


I22916, 


I22918 


Emmett v. Penoyer 


808', 8087 


Emmons v. Hayward 




27614 


Empire Mfg. Co. v. Stuart 




122935 



Empire State Phospiiate Co. v. Heller 8083 
Endaily- v. State 25715 

.Enders v. McDonald 2139 

Enfield v. Ellington 11796, 1179*2 

English V. Sprague ' 117938 

Ennis v. Smith 529, 5214^ 35812, 11798, 

11791" 
Enslow V. Mitchell 122926 

Enterprise Soap Works v. Sayers 522 
Ephland v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. 978*2 

Equitable, &c. Ass'n v. McCluskey 39122, 

39128 



Erickson v. Brookings Co. 

V. R. R. Co. 

Erie R. R. 0. Heath 
Erissman v. Erissman 
Eskridge 0. Cinciunat: 

V, State 

Estell V. State 

Estrella, Tlie 

Ethier v. Homier 

Etna V. Brewer 

Ettinger v. Com. 

Eureka Springs R'y v. Timmons 

Evans v. Browne 

V. Evans 

V. Hettich 

V. Koons 

V. Montgomery 

V. State 

Evansich v. R. R. 
Evanston v. Gunn 
Evarts v. Middlebury 
Ewing V. Bailey 

V. Sandoval, &c. Co. 

V. Smith 



808" 

622* 

12293 

97813, 97823 

&c. R. R. 2572 

58812 

39125 

1179" 

62219, 622" 

391* 

5545 

52" 

218 

91019 

91026 

2572 

554* 

47019, 6355, 6356 

25736, 97837 

11791 

3663 

91012, 91013, 91014 

80825 

80821 



Fabtan v. Russell 
Faires v. Cockrill 
Fairly v. Fairly 



Falke v. Fassett 
Fancher v. De Montegre 
Farmers' Bank v. Whitehill 
Farrar v. Bates 

Farrow v. Nashville, &c. R. R. 
Farwell v. Tyler 
Fash V. Blake 
Faucet v. Nichols 
Faulkner v. Rondoni 
Fauntleroy v. Hannibal 
Faxon v. HoUis 
Fay V. Gray 

V. Harlan 

V. Miville 

Featherman v. Miller 
Fee V. Taylor 
Feemster v. Ringo 
Fell V. Young 
Felsenthal v. State 
Felt V. Amidon 
Feltz V. Walker 
Fenno v. Weston 
Fenton v. Miller 

i: State 

Ferdinand v. State 
Ferguson v. Harwood 



2122 

80822 
183", 97829, 97829, 
122921, 122922, 12292* 



2118 
46325 

2128 

1179*8 
218* 

122933 
2577 
978** 
2112 



46312, 463", 46316 

8082 

39136 

212* 

3585 

122953 

2127 

183", 122923 
25729 
3919 
80821 
554* 
1179*7 

2136 

2130 

117923, 117926, 

117933 

6227 



V. McBean 

V. Rafferty 

Feron v. Donelly 11791 

Field V. Boynton 4521 

Fields V. State 2121 
Fife V. Com. 2766, 2767, 588", 5882°, 58826 

Fifield V. Richardson 3912 

File V. Springel 35821 

Finch V. Alston 1832* 



CCXXVUl 



AMEEICAN TABLE OP CASES. 
References are to pages. 



Finch V. Barclay 


978 


,978* 


Fowler v. Simpson 


4271 


Finnegan v. ])ugan 




3654 




80811 


Fire Asso'n v. Wicltliam 




808" 


Fowles V. Allen 


5547, 65413 


Fire Ins. Co. v. Wickhani 


8086 


8082a 


Fox V. Com. 


2119 


First Kat. Bank v. Aslimead 




80819 


V. Peninsular, &c. Works 39182 


V. Dunn 




8081 


V. Eeil 12296. 12297. 122912 


V. First Nat. B'k of Williams- 




Fralick v. Presley 


87837 


port 


0781, 9782 


Framiiigham Mfg. Co. v 


. Barnard 4528 


V. Huber 




4639 


Franklin v. Franklin 


2572. 97845 


V. Kingsley 




2129 


Franklin Bank v. Steam Nav. Co. ' 9784» 


V. Post 




80828 


Fraser v. Fraser 


9787, 978» 


Fischer Leaf Co. «. Whipple 




3916 


V. State 


5882 


Fisher u. Conway 




25752 




6228 


V. Mayor 




46326 


Frazier v. Pennsylvania 


R. R. 25736, 25741 


' V. UUman 




11796 


V. State 


97862 


Fitch V. Chapman 




4525 


Frear v. Drinker 


910" 


Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, &c. 


Con- 




Freeh v. Phil. &c. R. K. 


276" 


struction Co. 




5212 


Fredrick v. State 


58824 


Fitzgibbon v. Brown 




25734 


Free v. Buckingham 


97842 


Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick 


97811) 


, 97811 


Freeman v. Bass 


8088 


Flagg V. Mason 


4127, 4129 


V. Brewster 


6226 


Flanagin v. State 


910* 


, 91022 




18345 


Flanders v. Merritt 




18331 


Freeny v. Freeny 


9105 


Flanigin v. Washington Ins. Co. 


2]8 


Fremont Butter, &c. Co 


. V. Peters 9784* 


Flattery v. Flattery 




6354 


Fremoult v. Dedin 


11799 


Fleming v. Springfield 




39137 


French v. Ryan 


25719 


. V. Yost 




46311 


!.-. Sale 


25739, 25748 


Fletcher v. Boston & Maine R. E. 


978*6 


V. White 


25717 


V. Fitchburg R. R. 




524 


V. Wilkinson 


3657 


V. Fuller 




18844 


Frcse v. State 


2138 


V. Perry 




1229' 


Frick V. Barbour 


18327 


V. State 




5881 


Friend v. Hamill 


25712 


Flower v. Balto. &c. R. R. 




365" 


V. Miller 


117919, 117922 


Flowers v. Fletcher 




122932 




18328 


Floyd y. Tewksbury 




4282 


Friendly v. Lee 


9789 


Floyd's Heirs v. Johnson 




2129 


Frink & Co. v. Coe 


8919, 39184 


Flynn v. Coffee 




18337 


Fritz V. Burriss 


0781 


Folks V. Burnett 


391« 


, 39143 


Frome.t). Dennis 


3916 


Follain v. Lefevre 




2124 


Frost !>. McCarger 


25737, 97864 


Follansbee v. Walker 


62225 


, 91017 


Frye v. Barker 


4631 


Folsom V. Cook 




18349 


Fudge r. Payne 


80826 


V. Manchester 




62228 


Fulfcerson v. Murdock 


18329 


Fonda v. Burton 




8081 


Fuller V. Fox 


1229*4 


Foot V. Bentley 




3583 


f. Hampton 


55410, 55412 


Foote V. Cobb 




122916 


V. Linzee 


18342 


Porbush V. Goodwin 




8081 


Fulton V. Central Bank of Pittsburg 97838, 


Force v, Martin 




97831 




97835 


Ford ji. Cunningham 




35813 


Fulton Bank v. Stafford 


97887 


V. Ford 


257« 


25761' 


Funderburg v. State 


2576 


v. State 




97839 


Funk V. Babbitt 


97826 


Fordyce v. McCants 




39124 


V. Ely 


46324 


Forgey v. First Nat'l Bank 




122948 


Furbush v. Goodwin 


80810 


Forrester v. State 




39129 


Furguson v, Wright 


18331 


Forsyth v. Charlebois 




6224 


Furhman v. Mayor, &c. 


of Huntsville 21" 


Foscue V. Lyon 




2130 






Foster, In re 




97831 


G., C, & S. F. R't Co. 


V. Jones 8086 


V. Cleveland, &c. R. R. 




35821 


Gady u. State 


2127 


V. Collner 




122968 


Gaffney v. People 


97848 


V. Hall 


6226, 6229 


Gage V. Campbell 


35819 


V. Neilson 




214 


I'. Lewis 


80821 


V. Newbrough 




8081° 


Gaines u. Green Pond 


Iron Mining 


Fongue v. Burgess 




39129 


Co. 


427" 


Fournel v. Duvert 




122948 


V. New Orleans 


4273 


Fonts V. State 




58814 


V. Relf 


39141 


Fowler v. Mtna. Fire Ins. Co. 




25727 


V. Scott 


122912 



AMERICAN TABLE OP CASES. 



CCXXIX 



References are to pages. 



Gallagher v. Market St. K. R. 

V. State 

Galle V. Tode 

Galveston, &c. R. R. v. Arispe 

^ — V. Johnson 

Galvin v. Palmer 

Gammage v. Moore 

Ganahl v. Shore 

Gandolfo v. State 

Gannon t'. People 

Ganton v. Size 

Garden City Sand Co. v. Miller 

Gardere v. Columbian Ins. Co, 



2112 
62218 
39183 

2134 

1179' 

808« 

4638 

257'9, 257", 25748 

6223 

452* 

1179^1 

117916 



Gardiner v. People 
Gardner v. Collector 

V. Connelly 

V. Crenshaw 

V, Eberhart 

'- V. Erieze 

V. Kellogg 

■ V. Lewis 



Garneau v. Port Blakely Mill Co 

Garner v. Myriek 

Garrard i'. State 

Garrella v. Alexander 

Garrett v. State 

Garrigues v. Harris 

Garrison u. Goodale 

Garvin v. State 

V. Wells 

Garwood v. Hastings 
Gates V. Johnson Co. 
Gaul V. Fleming 
Gaunt V. Harlcness 
• V. State 



SeS-i", 36521 

2110 

9782", 978-w 

2572 

2122, 358a3 

39133 

391*7, 9105 

5212 



117912 

55413 

5882», 58822, 58826 

122933 

25714, 5545 

117934 

3916 

36519, 36520 

2114 

18334, 18.337 

2132 

27614 

I229S8. 122945, 122947 

3654, 365S 



Gavit V. SnowliiU 117927 

Gay V. Rogers 117935, n794», 117941 

Gaynor v. Old Colony B. R. Co. 52' 

Gebb V. Howell 80825 

Gebhart w. Shindle 910" 

Gehr v. Fisher 4277 

Geist V. Detroit City Ry. 2133 

Gelott V. Goodspeed 1229^ 

George v. Joy 978i, 978*, 978^, 978^ 

Georgia, &c. Co. v. Reid 808" 

Georgia, &c. R. R. «. Gaines 2140 

German Nat. Bank v. Burns 1835° 

V. Leonard 4639, 5542 

Gerrish v. Sweeter 554^, 554" 

Gibbons v. Ellis 80828 

V. Wisconsin, &c. R. R. 25725 

Gibbs V. Gilead, &c. Society 522 

Gibney v. Marchay 5545 

Gibson v. Manuf rs' Ins. Co. 52i5 

0. Robinson 117929 

V. Stevens 215 

^ — V. Trowbridge Furniture Co. 122942, 

122958 
Giddlngs v. Day 183*^ 

Gilbert v. Campbell 62216 

V. Flint, &c. R. R. 2138 

— — V. Gooderham 978*5 

V. Moline Plow Co. 3588 

V. Moline Water Power & Mfg. 

Co. 2120 



Gilbert v. Porter 


46321 


Gilchrist v. Beswick 


80819 


V. Brooklyn GroCers' 


Manuf. 


Assoc. 


46318 


V. Martin 


4529 


Gilchrist & King v. Martin & West 4527 


Giles V. Morrow 


18334 




6545 


Gill V. State 


9102», 91024 


Gilliam v. State 


25746 


Gilliland v. Sellers 


2122, 2128 


Gilman v. Riopelle 


11795 


Gilmanton v. Ham 


3654 


Gilmore v. Baker Co. 


117936 


Gilpin V. Greene 


8083 


Giipins V. Consequa 


8088 


Ginnath v. Blankenship 


522 


Girdlestone v. O'Reilly 


218 


Gizler v. Witzel 


2761 


Gladdish v. Godoliaux 


80825 


Glass V. Bennett 


3916 


Glasscock v. Hughes 


18317, 122924 


Gleason v. Kinney 


46318 


Gleeson v. Wallace 


122927, 122942 


Glen Brick Co. v. Shackell 


35822 



Glenn v. Roosevelt 122942, 122955 

Glenn's Adm'r v. Express Co. 117928 

Giidden v. Dunlap 2* 

Globe Works v. Wright 52^ 



Goddard v. Gardner 
Goins V. Moberly 
Golden v. Knowles 
Goldsmith v. Picard 

V. Sawyer 

Goldstone v. Davidson 
Goltra V. Sanasaok 
Gonzales a. Ross 
Gooch V. Connor 
Goodall V. State 
Goode s". Riley 
Gooding v. Morgan 
Goodman v. James 
Goodnow V. Parsons 
Goodrich v. Weston 
Goodrich's Case 
Goodrum v. State 
Goodwin v. Appleton 

V. Garr 

u. Jack 

V. State 

Goodwin, &c. Co.'s Appeal 
Goodwyn v. Goodwyn 
Goodyear v. Vosbnrgh 
Goodyear Rubber Co. » 
Gordon v. Montgomery 

V. Parke & Co. 

V. Price 

V. Searing 

V. Tvi^eedy 

Gordon's Case 
Gorgas v. Hertz 
Gorham v. Auerswald 

V. Canton 

V. Gorham 

Gormley «. Day 



62214, 62215, 62217 

97840 

528 

25729, 8085 

216 

117936 

80826 

2124, 2131 

8088 

470H 97844 

80826 

218, 2120^ 2121, 2122 

11792s 
5541, 55412 

35816 

117922 

6221 

2120 

18324 

4282 



6225 

117920 

122950, 122966 

Scott Co. 97856 

2118 

80814 

122937 

35819 

2136 

122952 

358" 

5547 

39142, 39148 

22 

2112 



ccxxx 



AMEEICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
References are to pages. 



Gormley v. Utlie 


11795 


Goss f. JFromati 


622-^5 


Gould V. Crawford 


gio'", 910^4 


II. Ins. Co. 


5548 


V. MuCarty 


1229=i 


V. Smith 


39131 


Gove V. Downer 


2129 


Governor v. Roberts 


358S 


Goza V, Browning 


12299, 1229*2, i229»o 


Grace v. McArtliur 


2577 


Gragg V. Learned 


1179" 


Graham v. Anderson 


2119, 2124 


V. Campbell 


36812 


V. Chrystal 


257*'' 


V. Nesmith 


122945 


V. People 


6221 


V. State 


25732 


V. Williams 


219 


Grand Tower, &o. E. 


K. V. Walton 8082, 




80821 


Grand Trunk Ry. Co 


V. Richardson 2182 


Grangers' Ins. Co. v. 


Brown 3913' 


Grant v. Coal Co. 


6210, 117911, 117933 


V. Frost 


80812 


V. Hill 


117946 


V. Hughes 


808" 


V. State 


2114, 2121, 97819 


Grauley v. Jermyn 


35812 


Graves v. Battle Creek 365', 365ii 


V. Keaton 


219 


V. People 


39122, 4709 


Gray v. Davis 


117934 


V. McLaughlin 


39134 


V. Pentland 


6221', 62219, 12295 



Greany v. Long Island R. R. 276' 

Great West. Ey. Co. u. Bacon 276^ 

Green v. Bedell 39146 

i;. Benton 11792" 

V. Caulk 9784, 9786, 9737, 9738, 9781", 

978" 

v. Cawthorn 

V. Randall 

V. State 

, Terwilliger 
Van Buskirk 



■ V. 

■ V. 



39145 

80828 

5881", 58819 

122942, i229'6 

2118 

Greenleaf v. Dubuque, &c. R. R. 4279, 
42713, 42714 
Greenwood v. Fontaine 1179*2, n7943 

Greer v. Richardson Drug Co. 35819 

Gregg V. Forsyth 1179* 

V. Jamison 978** 

V. Mallett 18.'.24, 183*6, 183*7 

V. State 58818, 68821, 978", 978" 

Gregory v. Baugh 2132 

!■• Chambers 25723, 25734 

V. Thomas 25734 

Orellier v. Neale 1229'' 

Grennan v. McGregor 2125 

Gress Lumber Co. v. Goody 8085 

Grider v. Clopton 80821 

Grierson v. Mason 80826 

GriflBn v. Smith 6222 

V. State 3914', 39148^ i229«, 1229*8, 

122950 
Griffith V. Williams 122965, 122966 



Griffits V. Ivery 


122961, 


122966 


Grimes v. Eddy 




2188 


V. Martin 


, 


978" 


V. State 




9108 


Griswold v. Gallup 




218 


Grob V. Cusliman 




211' 


Groome v. Odgen City 




8083 


Groover v. Coffee 




122910 


Gross V. Drager 




80821 


Grover v. Grover 




117928 


Grumley v. Webb 




808" 


Gugy V. Maguire 




62220 


Guidery v. Green 


80822, 8082< 


,80828 


Guilbeau v. Mavs 




11796 


Gulf, &c. R. R. Co. V. Ellis 


1832' 


V. Johnson 




978*0 


w. Jones 




8086 


V. Nelson 




365" 


V. Rowland 




2573 


Gulick !;. Gulick 




6225 


Gulliver v. Fowler 


8088, 80823 


Gulzoni V. Tyler 




1229*8 


Gunning Co. v. Cusack 




91010 


Gurley v. Park 




6220 


Guyette v. Bolton 




808" 


Habertt v. State 




5884 


Hacker v. Young 




1179*1 


Hackett v. People 




470* 


Hadfleld v. Jameson 




213 


Hadjo V. Gooden 


25731, 25753, 9785* 


Hadley v. Carter 




391*2 


Haerle v. Kreihn 




91018 



Hagenlocher v. Coney Island, &c. 

E. R. 39134 

Haggin v. Haggin 52'2 

Haines v. Hanrahan 5215, 5216 

V. Territory 97816, 9782* 

Halhert v. Skyles 21" 

Hale V. Ard 4636 

V. Ross 117912 

Hall V. Amer. Masonic, &c. Ass'n 39135 

V. Brown 2112, 5549 

V. Costello 5215 

V. Glidden 4631*, 46315 

V. Houghton 97829, 97830 

V. Manchester 1179** 

!). Phelps 1229' 

V. Rixey 6226 

V. Vanderpool 1832', 18328 

Hall's Deposition 1833' 

Haller v. Clark 910*8 

Halsell V. Musgrave 80821 

Halsey v. Sinsebaugh 9781", 978" 

Ham V. Ham 2121 

Hamburg v. Wood & Co. 2i 

Hamel v. Amyot 257' 

Hamil v. England 622' 

Hamilton v. Clark 8O8I6 

V. Holder 978*5 

V. Liverpool, &c. Ins. Co. 52i 

V. People 



213', 257*8,257*0, 
622" 

Hammettw. Little Rock, &C.E.R. Co. 21" 
Hammil v. State 4700 



AMERICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
References are to pages. 



CCXXXl 



Hammond u. Varian 1229^^ 122936 

Hammond's Case 1229411 

Hammond's Lessee v. Inloes 2iu 

Hanawalt v. State 3B55 

Hancock v. American, &c. Ins. Co. 183^5 

V. Cook 4526 

V. Hintiager 463", 463a 

Handy v. State 391^1 

Hanks v. Rhoads 97833, 97834 

Hanley v. Donoghue 219, 2116, 21" 

Hanlon v. Dolierty 6225, 6228 

Uanna v. Hanna 3911* 

Hanney v. Com. 25731 

Hannum v. Belchertown 622^* 

Hanover R. R. v. Coyle 391" 

Hanriok 0. Andrews 117912 

Hanriot v. Sherwood 12293^, 1229**, 1229»7 
Hanselman v. Dovel giO'^o 

Hansen v. Miller 9783* 

Hanson i'. Bean 622^ 

V. Cliiatovioh 18331 

V. So. Scituate 21i8 

Happel V. Brethauer 11791* 

Hard v. Brown 391*9 

V. City of Decorah 21i2 

Harding v. State 588" 

Hardy v. State 52i 

Hargrove v. Adeock 12291^ 

Harkness v. Sears 8O8I1 

Harlan, &c. v. Howard, &c. 428i, 428^ 4283 
Harland v. Eastman 427i, 427", 427" 

D. Dail 391* 

1;. Rowe 117933 

Harriraan v. Brown 412^ 

Harrington v. Inhabitants of Lincoln 554', 

5549, 55411), 5.5411 

,'. State 183^3, 2o'73» 

Harris v. Harris 2761° 

u. Holmes 218^ 

V. Hoskins 1229^3 

w. Howard 257* 

V. Johnston 8081^ 

!>. State 2573', 97854 

Harrison v. Rowan 978^3 

Hart V. Bait. & 0. R. R. 2113, 21)2 

y. Bodley 2131 

«. Kendall 452* 

i>. Livingston 463-" 

V. State" 2127 

-;. Yunt 358', 3589, 358" 

Hartford i: Palmer 9101", 91023 

Hartford Bridge Co. «. Granger 554W 
t Hartford Fire Ins. Co. u. Reynolds 622W, 
62215, 622", 91024 
Hartlgan v. International Society 358i 
Hartranft's Appeal 6221' 

Hartsfield u. State 9782"' 

Harvey v. Pennypacker 8082' 

V. Smith 24 

I!. SuUens 8082D 

V. Thorp 35814 

Harwood v. Mulrv 4632, 4631' 

Haseltine v. Concord R. R. 25V^ 

Haskill V. Com. 276' 

Hassard v. Municipality No. 2 21i4 



Hastings v. Brooklyn Life Ins. Co. 18332, 
183M, 183°i 



Hatch V. Dunn 


2182 


Hatfield v. St. Paul, &c. R. 3656 


36512, 




36515 


Hatt V. Nay 


257*1 


Haughey v. Strickler 


2184 


Hawes v. State 18323, 257" 


, 257*» 


Hawkins v. Grimes 


122953 


V. James 


2182 


V. Sumter 


12294 


V. Thomas 


2123 


Haworth v. Norris 


8088 


Haycock v. Greuf 122946, 


122958 


Haj'es V. Adams 


122957 


Haynes v. MoRae 


18326 


I). Trenton 


3657 



Hays V. Northwestern Bank of Va. 21i3 
Hazleton v. Union Bank of Colum- 
bus 12295', 122959, 122963 
Hazzard v. Vickery 122943 
Headman v. Rose 21' 
Healy v. Moule 1229-^ 
Hearst v. Pujol 80825 
Heaston v. Cincinnati, &c. R. R. 21i2 
Heavenridge v. Mondy 8082» 
Hebbard v. Haughian 6225, 6228 
Hedden v. Roberts 18352 
Heddles v. Chicago, &c. R. R. 97846 
Hedge v. Clapp 97848 
Hedricks v. Morning Star 808" 
HefEron v. Gallupe 62224 
Heidenheimer v. Johnson 452i, 4526 
Heinemann v. Heard 2762, 276i' 



Heister v. Davis 


622i'> 


Helm V. State 


452' 


Helton V. Alabama, &c 


R. R. 39134 


Hemenway v. Smith 


622", 62216 


Hemingway v. Garth 


9782', 97828 


V. State 


I8.322 


Hemmens v. Bentley 


97854 


Hempstead v. Reed 


1179" 


Henderson v. Cargill 


4273,4276,427", 




42712 


V. Hackney 


122962, 122966 


B. State 


18328, 97846, 97851 


V. Terry 


6227 


Hendricks v. State 


6351 


Henry v. Bishop 


1229' 


Henshaw v. Davis 


4635, 46;-5' 


Hensley v. Tarpey 


21' 


Henthorn v. Doe 219, 


2131, 11793), 122921 


Herbst v. Lowe 


8082 


Hermann v. State 


36519 


Hernandez v. State 


18330 


Herrick v. Swoniley 


1229=8 


Herring ?■. Rogers 


12292', 122921 


V. Skaegs 


97826 


Herster ?•. Herster 


,391 w 


Hester r. State 


978 '7 


Hewitt V. Clark 


97826 


V. Pigott 


12298 


Hewlett V. Cock 


4282, 4283 


Hickey v. Hinsdale 


5542 


Hickman v. Hickman 


80823 



ccxxxu 



AMEEICAN TABLE OP CASES. 
References are to pages. 



Hickman v. Green 


622' 


Hickok V. Shelburne 


1179<9 


Hickory v. U. S. 


1229*8, 122y''3 


Hicks V. Leaton 


80811 


V. State 


2573 


Higbee v. Dresser 


6226 


Higginbotham v. Campbell 


621 


Higgins V. Carlton 


97851 


Higgs V. Sliehee 


46.323 


Higliam v. Ridgway 


sgi-is 


Higley v. Gilmer 


2571" 


Hildeburn v. Curran 


97858 


Hildreth v. Aldrich 


9782' 


Hill V. Bacon 


212» 


V. Com. 


4708 


V. Elridge 


39130 


V. Gust 


978« 


V. North 


391M 


V. Postley 


910'-'2 


1'. Proctor 


4125 



V. State 4701, 47013, 978^, 978^, 9784», 

978^8 

V. Wliidden 808^3 

Hill, F. I-I. Co. V. Sommer 46315 

Hillary v. Waller 183'3 

Hilts w. Colvin 358i, 1179« 

Hilyard v. Township of Harrison 1229* 
Hiramelmann v. Hoadley 211^ 

122962 



Himrod v. Bolton 

V. Oilman 

Hinchman v. Keener 
Hinckley !'. Beckwith 
Hinde v. Valtier 
Hines v. Com. 

V. Driver 

Hinkle v. State 
Hinnemann v. Rosenback 
Hipes V. Cochran 
Hissricjic v. McPherson 
Hizer V. State 



122958, 122962 
122938 

2134 
2116 

4705 
80821 
97816 

8085 

2]36 

46310 

2118 



Hobbs V. Mempliis, &c. R. Co. 21" 

Hodges V. Coleman 39150 

Hoefling v. Hambleton 3581' 

Hoffman v. Bloomsburg, &c. R. R. Sed" 
Hogan V. State 257« 

Hoit V. Moulton 122928 

Holbrook v. Gay 46320 

Holcomb V. Holcomb 910i, 91021, 91022, 
91023, 91026 
Holder v. V. S. 97813, 978i' 

Hollenbach v. Fleming 1229', 122912 



2123 

622' 

25733, 2578*, 25788 

91019, 91020 

522 

5215, 5216 

3585 

12298*, 1229*2, 1229*5 

18334 

V. State 257", 257*', 58815, 1179' 

V. Turner's Falls Co. 4126 

Holsey v. State 25729, 257«, 257*3 

Holaton, &c. Co. v. Campbell 8086 

Holt V. Holt 8082* 



V. Schnabel 

Hollenback v. Todd 
Holly V. Burgess 
— ^- V. State 
Holm V. Colman 
Holman v. King 
Holmes v. Coryell 

V. Goldsmith 

V. Johnson 



Holt V. Jarvis 39151 

V. Moore 8081" 

Homans v. Corning 2i 

Home Ins. Co. v. Baltimore Ware- 
house Co. 554' 
Homer v. Cilley 122923, 12292* 

V. Wallis 1229', 1229", 122913, 122916 

I22918, 122919 
Hood V. Bloch 36521 

V. Tyner 55410 

Hooper v. Taylor 46313 

Hoover v. Cary 3912S 

V. Gehr 46311, 463M 46315, 46319, 

46322 



Hope V. Balen 




808' 


Hopkins v. Megquire 




12292', 122938 


Hopkinson v. Leeds 




97833 


Hopt V. Utali 




39131, 588" 


Hermann v. Wirtel 




5541 


Horn V. Hansen 




80828 


Horsford v. Eowe 




4523, 452", 452' 


Horton v. Reed 




529, 5213 


Hougli V. Henk 




463* 


V. People's Fire Ins 


. Co. 808* 


Houghtaling v. Kilderho 


use 25728 


Hougliton V. Jones 




97833, 9783* 


1.-. Paine 




46313 


Houlton V. Chic, &c. 


E. 


R. 2121 


V. Manteuffel 




4273 


Houston, &c. R. E. v 


Burke 9781, 978*, 






9785 


Houx V. Blum 




622', 6228 


Houze V. Houze 


1179", 117920, 11798* 


Hovey v. Sebring 




1832* 


Howard v. Coon 




117921 






622* 


V. Gemming 




1179*8, 1179*' 


V. Moot 




2132 


V. Russell 




4276 


V. State 




18386, 18840, 91020 


Howe V. Fleming 




35810, 35811 


Howell V. Ashmore 




12291 


y. Huyck 




35818 


Howley v. Wliipple 




35816 


Howser v.. Com. 




358*, 97832, 97841) 



Hoxsie V. Empire Lumber Co. 39152, 

122967 
Hoy V. Morris 62215 

Hoyt !'. Am. Exchange Bank 12292 

V. McNeil 521" 

V. Russell 2P, 2120, 2124 

Hubbard v. And., &c. E. R. 25726 

V. Greeley 8083 

V. Hubbard 9781', 97822 

V. Russell 3582* 

Hubby V. State 9783 

Huckestein v. Kelly 8O822 

Huckins v. Ins. Co. 97826 

Hudson I'. State 2182, 470i, 470', 6222* 
Huetteman v. Viesselmann 554' 

Huffman v. Cartwright 5542 

V. Click 39132 

Hughes V. Rogers 122961 

V. Sandal 8O8I 

V. Southern Warehouse Co. 35823 



AMERICAN TABLE OE CASES. 
References are to pages. 



ccxxxm 



Hull V. Lyon 


62215, 62217 


Irish f. Horn 




46311 


Humble v. Sclioemaker 


978-' 


Iron Mfg. Co. v. Gaskell 




2130 


Hume«. Scott 


257« 


Isaacson v. N. Y. Cen. R. 




2187 


Humes v. O'Bryan 452s, 452', 554* 


Israel v. Brooks 




2578* 


Humphrey v. Burnside 


2131 


Ivy V. Yancy 




183*6 


Hunnicutt v. Peyton 


4128, 41210 








V. State 


4705, 47010 


Jack v. Martin 




2130 


Hunscom v. Hunscom 


91012, 91014 


Jackling v. Edward 




12292 


Hunt V. Luquere 


122922 


Jacks V. Stimpson 




525 


V. Order of Chosen Friends 1179" 


Jackson v. Blanshan 1831', 18318, 


122921. 


Hunter v. Gihbs 


97851 




122923, 


122924 


V. N. Y. &c. R. K. 


215, 2129 


V. Boneham 




39180 


— - V. State 


391*2 


V. Brooks 




122959 


Huntley v. Whittier 


18350 


V. Burtis 




12295 


Hurd V. People 


470* 


V. Burton 


122914, 


122919 


Hurlburt v. Hall 


978»* 


V. Chicago, &c. R. R. 


80828 


Hurley v. O'Sullivan 


276" 




4276, 427* 


, 62218 


Hussman v. Wilke 


8081 






97855 


Husson V. Fox 


12292 


V. Gridley 




91012 


Huster v. Davis 


622* 


V. Jackson 


520, 4278 


Huston's Estate 


468" 


D. King 




1179*1 


Hutcliins V. Hebbard 


80828 


V. Kingsley 




122920 


Hutchinson v. Hutchinson 


808* 


V. Laraway 




122922 


V. Wheeler 


97852 


V. Lewis 




257*' 


Hutchison v. Patrick 


117923 


V. Phillips 




122958 


Hutto V. State 


18322 


V. State 


5888, 97819, 9782* 


Hyde v. Shank 


35828 


V. Swope 




978*' 


V. Woolfolk 


1229«5 


V. Waltermire 




1832* 


Hyde Park i'. Canton 183'3, 


1833', ]83i«. 


Jacksonville, &c. R. R. v. 


Peninsular 




9102* 


Land, &c. Co. 




25725 


Hynes v. McDermott 


1229« 


Jacobs V. Duke 




25726 
6228 
391*1 


Lvsisi V. Brown 


12298 


James v. Wharton 


4638C 


, 46338 


Iliinger v. State 


36521, 36522 


Jameson v. Conway 




5542 


Illinois, &c. Co. ti. Bonner 


3581* 


Jaques v. Horton 




3581* 


V. Langdon 


39129 


Jaquith v. Scott 




41210 




522 


Jarvis v. Robinson 




213 




39186 


V. Vanderford 


1229*2, 


122961 


Imlay v. Rogers 


62221 


Jaspers v. Lano 




9785* 


Independence v. Pompton 


427* 


Jefferds v. People 




58812 


Indiana Car Co. v. Parker 


3656, 36520 


Jeffries v. Harris 




2572' 


Indianapolis, &c. R. Co. v. Caldwell 2ll5 


Jemison a. Planters & 


Merchants 


V. Horst 


2768, 2769 


Bank 


• 


2118 


V. Stepliens 


2135 


Jenkins v. Eldridge 




978*9 


Ingalls V. State 


18380 


V. Kinsley 




11798« 


Inglis V. Hughes 


2119 


V. Lykes 




525 


Ingraham w. Hart 


5210, 5214 


V. Pepoon 




117919 


Ingrain v. State 


2118 


V. State 


635*, 9781 


, 978" 


Inliabitants of Springfield a 


Wor- 


Jenkinson v. State 


622*, 62216 


cester 


218 


Jenne v. Marble 




6221 


Inman v. Foster 


2578* 


Jennings v. Sturdevant 




622' 


Ins. Co. of No. Araer. u. Forcheimer 


Jensen v. McCorkell 




18352 


2118, 529, 5213 


Jester v. Steiner 




1229*' 


Ins. Co. V. Baker 


117981 


Jewell V. Center 




21* 


t>. Mosley 391», 3918, 


39110, 39i2i_ 


V. Jewell 




4275 


39126 


, 3918*, 39142 


Joannes ». Bennett 




18.326 


r. Weide 


46321 


Joaquin v. Budd 




2124 


International, &c. R. R. v. Anderson 


Jockumsen v. Suffolk Sa 


V. Bk. 


18338 




39116 


Joe V. State 




58821 


V. Dawson 


80822 


Johnson v. Blanshaw 




122922 


V. Pasture Co. 


39151 


V. Day 




5.54* 


V. Ragsdale 


554', 55410 


V. Drew 




11793 


Ireland v. Cincinnati, &c. R. 


R. 25725 


V. East Carolina, &c 


. R. R. 


80823 


Irish V. Dean 


8081* 


V. Holliday 




5545 



CCXXXIV 



AMERICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
Beferences are to pages. 



Johnson v. Hudson R. R. R. Co. 2129, 2139 

v. Mason 122932 

V. Merithew . 18334, iggss 

V. State 2574', 3915, 5889, 58810, 

58818, 68825, 62223, 9106, 910^2, 91025 
97815, 978*5, 97863 

V. Trinity Church So. 5-545 

V. Watson 910" 

V. Wiley 978", 978*5 

Johnston v. ITariners Ins. Co. 9785, 978' 

V. Heddeu 2126 

Jones V. Blount 12292° 

V. Brewer 122912 

V. Com. 39116 

V. Cordele Guano Co. 1179" 

V. Duchow 257« 

V. East Tenn. R. R. Co. 62* 

V. Gale's Curatrix 21i5 

V. Hays 2115 

V. Henshall 4639, 46311 

V. Howard 452i, 4525 

V. Jones 35822, 3658, 3655^ 4271 

V. Lake View 211^ 

V. Malvern Lumber Co. 978** 

V. Mellndy 117933 

V. M'Neil 978*5 

V. Phelps 122925 

V. Portland 89135 

V. 11. R. 91019 

V. Randall 1833, 1834 

V. Roberts 1229*9 

V. Simpson 276io 

V. State 2183, 25733, 257*', 39128, 

4706, 47013, 47015, 47017, 622", 978*5, 
97851, 1229*3 



V. Swearingen 


522, 8086 


V. Townsend 




391*5 


V. Tucker 




526 


Jordan v. Faircloth 




12299 


V. Osgood 




25718 


Joseph V. National Bank 




1229*5 


V. Ostell 




808' 


V. State 




6358 


Joslin V. he Baron 




523 


Juilliard v. Chaffee 


808 


, 80826 


Jumpertz v. People 


122957, 


122962 


Justice V. State 




47011 


Kaeltn !i. Cora. 




5545 


Kahn v. Traders' Ins. Co. 




55412 


Kansas, &o. R. R. Co. v. Foster 


523 


V. Miller 




183*2 


V. Phillips 




2129 


i: Richardson 




52* 


Karr v, .Jackson 




117920 


V. State 


122921, 


122928 


V. Stivers 


4635, 46318 


Kaut V. Kessler 




622' 


Keagle v. Pessell 




35828 


Kean v. Rice 


11791°, 


117911 


Kearney v. Farrell 




39185 


0. Mayor, &c. of N. Y. 


358", 3582° 


V. State 




2578» 


Keator v. Dimmick 




6222 


Keefer v. Zimmerman 




122915 



Keerans v. Brown 




978**, 978*6 


Keith V. Hayden 




2126 


V. Lothrop 




122928, 122936 


V. Stiles 




117921 


V. Wilson 


97817, 97820, 9782* 


Keller v. Stuck 




18336 


Kelley v. Owens 




276* 


V. People 




588*, 6885 


V. Saltmarsh 




8082 






2130 


Kellogg V. Tonipson 




8081 


Kelly V. Carter 




80822 


V. Dunlap 




122919 


V. Leachman 




8085 


V. McGuire 


427*, 4278, 42711 






8082' 


V. People 




97818, 97816 


V. State 




255** 


V. Stone 




9783* 


Kelsea v. Fletcher 




9782, 978i» 


Kelsey v. Hanmer 1179*2, 


122920, 122928 


Kelton V. Hill 




463* 


Kendall v. Collier 




12292', 122935 


V. Field 




46313 


V. May 


9103, 91021, 91022 


Keniston v. Rowe 




3655 


Kennard v. Kennard 




529, 5218^ 5216 


Kennebrew v. Southern 


&c 


Co. 5212 


Kennedy v. Com. 




2128 


V. Doyle 46326, 


4632', 46328, 11791 


V. Luliold 




412*, 4125 


V. R. C. & B. R. Cc 


. 


39136 


V. Reynolds 




1179** 






122961 


Kenney v. Van Home 




117910 


Kennon v. Gilmer 




257*2 


Kenosha Store Co. u. Shedd 


2123 


Kent V. Mason 




39129 


V. State 




97862 


V. White 




2762 


Kentucky, &c. Bridge C 


n. V 


Hall 8085 


Kentucky Cen. R. R. v. 


Barrow 2572* 


Keppel V. R. R. 




2127 


Kermott v. Ayer- 




212' 


Kern v. Bridwell 




3658 


Kernin v. Hill 




122958 


Kerr v. Freeman 




2763 


Kessel v. Albetis 




218 


Ketchum v. Am. &c. Ex 


.Co 


27610 


V. Brooks 




36816 


Keyser v. Coe 




2132 


Kibby v. Harsh 




80819 


Kidd V. Ward 




18329 


Kidder v. Blaisdell 




2121, 2122 


Kierstead v. Brown 




554'. 52418 


Kilburn v. Bennett 


3913*. 39142, 39143 


Kile V. Yellowhead 




2126 


Kilgore v. Stoner 




117936 


Killebrew v. Murphy 




2132 


Kilpatrick v. Com. 




212*, 4709 


Kimball v. Davis 




978*9 


V. Morrell 




12292^ 


King V. Colvin 




2763 


V. Donahoe 




122967 


V. Donaliue 




1229*8 



AMERICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
Beferences are to pages. 



CCXXXV 



King V. Doolittle 

V. Duke 

u. Eriswell 

I). Gallun 

V. Harringworth 

V. Holt 



1836 

11798' 

4123 

213S 

122913 
11793, 1179* 



122922 

2121 

18318 



V. Inhabitants of Bathwick 

V. Kent's Heirs 

V. Little 

y. N. Y. Central, &c. E. E 

u. Euckman 257^1 

V. Sears 122921 

V. State 39123, 4796, 588^ 97819 

V. Worthington 3588, 9102" 

Klnghorne i). Montreal Teleg. Co. 358i^ 
Kingman v. Cowles 11792", II7921 

Kinnard Co. v. Cutter Co. 80816 

Kinney v. Farnsworth 412ii, 554" 

V. Flynn 1229', 12293, 122912, 1229" 

V. U. S. 4632<" 

Kirby v. Com. 39113 

Kirchgraber v. Lloyd 257^ 

Kirkland v. Smith 117924 

Kirkpatrick v. Clark 8O821 

Kiser v. CarroUton Dry Goods Co. 808^ 



Kissam v. Forrest 


978" 


Kitner v. Whitlock 


27613 


Klare v. State 


2138 


Klein v. Lawdman 


18332, 18339 


V. Eussell 


35823 



Kleinmann v. Gieselmann 358ii 

Kline v. Baker 52^, 521'', 5215, 5216 

Knight V. House 257*9, 2575" 

Knode v. Williamson 257*' 

Knowles v. Crampton 36521, 36522 

Knox V. Silloway 1179*', 1179*8 

Koehler v. Buhl 978*' 

Koehring u. Muemminghoff 808' 

Koenig 0. Bauer 978S» 

Koons V. State 1229'^ 

Kornegay v. Kornegay 1229^1 

Kostenbader v. Peters SOS'^i 

Kotwitz V. Wright 463ii 

Kracke v. Homeyer 8082' 

Krager v. Pierce 9783* 

Kramer v. Goodlander 412' 

Kranich v. Sherwood 8082* 

Krebs v. State 470' 

Kreuzberger v. Wingfield 808^ 

Kreuziger v. Chicago, &c. R. E. 39132, 

39133 
Kuglar V. Garner 3915» 

Kunder v. Smith 978i, 9783 

Kusch V. Kusch 91013 

Kutcher v. Love 55412, 55413 

Lact v. State 391*' 

La Fayette Bank v. Stone 1179", 1179311 
Laing v. Raine 122912 

Lake Merced Water Co. v. Cowles 2133 
Lake Shore, &c. R. R. </. Bangs 523 

V. Rosenzweig 39136 

V. Squire 80822 

Lamagdelaine v. Tremblay 2572' 



Lamar u. Micou 21i6 

r. Pearre 39130,4522,11793' 

Lamb v. State 635* 

V. Ward 9783* 

Lambright v. State 588^ 

Lamoreaux v. Atty.-Gen. 427^ 

Lampton v. Haggard 212' 

Land 0. Pattesou 21ii* 

Lander v. People 391' 

V. Seaver 25726 

Landis v. Turner 463', 463" 

Lane v. Bryant 391'26 

V. Cole 1229* 

Lanergan v. People 5546 

Langley v. Wadsworth 978** 

Lannark v, Dougherty 365' 

Lanning v. Chicago, &c. E. E. 2572S 

Lansing v. Eussell 11792" 

Lapowski v. Taylor 122916 

La Roche 0. O'Hagau 8082, 8O8I6 

Laros v. Com. 588'2* 

La Salle Co. v. Milligan 2U* 

Lasher v. State 2132 

Lassing v. James 808^ 

Lassone v. Railroad 46336 

Lathrop v. Stuart 219, igS** 

Laughlin u. Fidelity Ins. Co. 808i» 

V. State 978", 97818 

Laughran v. Kelly 635' 

Laurent v. Vaughn 391^1 

Lavalle v. People 21i3 

Laverenz v. Chicago, &c. R. R. 52* 
Lawder v. Henderson 9783*, 97835 

Lawrence v. Dole 80828 

y. Du Bois 80819 

V. Kimball 4528 

V. Tennant 4121, 4129 

Lawson v. Glass 978*, 978', 978" 

V. State 257*s 

Lazard v. Merchants', &c. Co. 808" 

Lazare v. Jacques 8O821 

Lazier v. Westcott 21i3 

Lea V. Kilburn 391*9 

League v. Thorp 1179*6 

Learned v. Corley 1833* 

V. Tillotson 554* 

V. Tritch 80821) 

Leathe v. BuUard 80828 
Leather Co. v. Hardware, &c. Co. 52" 

Leavitt v. Cutler 2123 

Lee V. Fowler 8082 

I'. Tinges 97826 

Lefevre v. Lefevre 80828 

V. State 58826, 58327 

Lefferts v. Brampton 12292 

Legg's Case ' 18.38 
Lehman Bros. v. McQueen 2762, 276" 

Leiber v. Com. 470*, 470' 

Leland v. Wilkinson 21" 
Leonard v. Allen 25733, 25735, 25739, 257*1 

V. Kingsley 978*' 

Leport V. Todd 18331 

Lesher y. Levan 1229' 

Leslie v. Hanson 46.3" 

Lessee of Allen v. Lyons 2129 



CCXXXVl 



AMEEICAN TABLE OP CASES. 
References are to pages. 



Lessee of Scott v Eatliffe 


39180 


Lord ». Am. &o. Ins. Co. 




80819 


Lester v. State 


68812, 68813 


Loree v. Abner 




2116 


Levers v. Van Buskirk 


622W 


Lorenzana v. Camarillo 




6542 


Levy V. State 219, 2in 36520, 891" 


Lottawanna, The 




216 


Lewis, In re 


97840 


Louden v. Blythe 




3918 


Lewis V. Barker 


978" 


Louisville, &c. R. R. u. Buck 




39118 


V. Bayliss 


80819 


V. Hall 




3916'' 


V. Harris 


217, 2181 


V. Hurt 




97812 


0. Kramer 


4638J, 978' 






18319 


V. McClure 


218 


V. Orr 




35812 


V. Meginniss 


46323 


V. Richardson 


257" 


25783 


r. State 212i,470s.470i«| 


V. Terrell 




97834 


V. Supervisors 


2120 






8658 




2122 


V. Wright 


654' 


65411 


L'Herbettei). Pittsfield Nat. 


Bank 2578 


Lovell V. Payne 




2766 


Libby v. Brown 


4525 


Loveridge v. Hill 




6228 


Liddle v. Old Lowell Bank 


978", 978« 


Low V. Mitchell 




25728 


Liddon v. Hodnett 


11795 


Lowe V. Lowe 




97826 


Liggett V. Glenn 


62215 


V. State 


68821 


58822 


Lightfoot V. People 


2578 


Lowell V. Todd 




1832' 


Lilly V. Waggoner 


18382 


Lowry v. Cady 




3581 


Linch V. Lineli 


39139,391" 


V. Moss 


452 


,4526 


Lincoln v. Battelle 21^, II792, il79W 


Loyd V. Hannibal, &c. R. R. 


3659 


36512 


Lind V. Lind 


18331 


Lucas V. Flinn 




97846 


Lindauer v. Meyberg 


358" 


Luce V. Coyne 




122942 


Lindley v. Dakin 


2* 


V. Foster 




80823 


Lindsay v. Hamburg, &c. Ins 


Co. 522 


Lucker v. Com. 




2114 


V. Williams 


2122 


Luke V. Calhoun Co. 




2136 


Lindsey v. Atty.-Gen. 


2118 


Lull !>. Cass 




80821 


Lingo V. State 


6222 


Lumpkin v. Murrell 




2180 


Linnell v. Sutherland 


4638 


Lund V. Tynsboro 


3918 


39128 


Linsley v. Lovely 


80812, 97838 


Lunn V. Scarborough 




122921 


Litchfield v. Merritt 


6222 


Lunsford v. Dietrich 




2579 


Little V. Cook 


89129 


Lurton v. Gilliam 




11798 


V. Downing 


18318, 46326 


Lush V. McDaniel 


39134 


39186 


V. Rogers 


1229« 


Lycoming, &c. Ins. Co. v. Wright 


5216 


1'. State 


3918 


Lyman v. Philadelphia 


257« 


, 25769 


V. Thompson 


2768 


Lynch v. Cronan 




4636 


Little's Case 


39113 


V. Moore 




25742 


Littlefield «. Rice 


46318 


Lynde v. Judd 




12298 


Little Rock Granite Co. v. Dallas Co. 463" 


Lyon V. Lyon 




5889 


IJttle Rock Ry. Co. v. Leverett 391" 


V. Manhattan R. R. 




3659 


Liverpool Steam Co. u. Phenix Ins. Co. 


«. Marine 




2186 




21" 


V. Prouty 




6223 


Livingston v. Arnoux 


4521 


Lyons v. Gregory 




117944 


u. Kiersted 


9101, 91021 








V. Roberts 


97846 


Mablbt v. Kittleberger 




39124 


V. Wood 


80819 


Macdonald v. Dana 




80819 


Livingstone v. Gartshore 


622" 


Macev v. Titcombe 




21" 


Lockhart v. White 


18338, 18339 


Mack u. State 


3912S 


,39126 


Lockwood V. Crawford 


52" 


MacKinzie v. Stretch 


664" 


, 55413 


Loeb 7'. Richardson 


2129 


Maclean v. Scripps 




36828 


Lofton V. Sterrett 


8082" 


Macomber v. Scott 




122946 


Loggins V. State 
Loliman v. State 


6548 


Madden v. State 




183' 


2128 


Magee ». Allison 


808 


, 80826 


Londonderry v. Andover 


4278, 4274 


V. Bnrch 




3582 


Long V. Coltoii 
V. Patton 


412' 


11. Scott 




11798' 


117982 


Magie v. Herman 




368i« 


V. State 


25781 


Magill V. Stoddard 




80828 


Longabaugh v. "Virginia City, &c. 


Maguire v. Middlesex Ry. 




2571 


R. R. 


2572' 


Maier v. State 




2188 


Loomis V. Bedel 


1179« 11794' 


Mailler v. Ex. Propeller Co. 




2672 


V. Stuart 


46819 


Major V. State 




2118 




358", ■6542 


Malcomson v. O'Dea 




4281 


Lopez V. State 


9101 


Mallory v. Ohio Farmers Ins 


.Co. 


122961 



AMEBICAN TABLE OP CASES. 
References are to pages. 



Mallory u. State 212' 

Mandel v. Swan Land Co. 358i- 

Mange v. Holmes 391*^ 

Manistee Bank v. Seymour 276^- 

Mann Boudoir Car Co. v. Dupre 8O812 

Manning v. Maroney 3581^ 

V. Pippen 80823 

Manufacturers, &o. Bank v. Baack 183i>* 

Manufacturing Co. v. Bennett II7922 
Marbury v. Madison 622", 62218 
Marcly v. Sliults 978', 978^, 978" 

Marcy v. Stone 452^ 

Mardes v. Meyers 1229^5 
Mark u. Hastings 3586, 358!) 

0. Merz 25731, 257* 

Marks v. Sullivan 62229 

Marsh v. Case 4638 

V. Davis 80820 

V. Hand 3588 

. V. Whitmore 183^ 

Marshall V. Baker 80828 

V. Brown ■ 39132 

V. Chicago, &c. R. K. 470^ 

V. G. E. B. K. Co. 4702 

V. State 257" 

Marshall Livery Co. v. McKelry 276ii 

Martin v. Anderson 11798' 

V. Bowie 35811 

1;. Brown 808° 

V. Elliot -36512 

V. Hardesty 25784 



Martin 

V. Nichols 

V. Payne 

Martindale v. Falkner 

Marvin v. Richmond 

■^- — V. State 

Marx V, People 

Mask V. State 

Mason v. Fuller 

Massey v. Bank 

^ — V. State 

Mathes v. Robinson 

Mathews v. Yerex 

Matlock V. Glover 

Matter of Hall's Deposition 

Matter of Page 

Matter of Ridgway 



2120, 2121 

46318 

5216, 117911, 117913 

183», 183*, 1835 

55411 

6358 

978« 

97832, 97888 

427* 

1229" 

58821 

46318 

91020 

122964 

18388 

39181 

183« 



CCXXXVll 



97888, 978*1 



Matter of Will of Snelling 978^2 

Matteson v. Noyes 3581" 

V. N. Y. Cen. R. R. 39186 

Matthews v. Hoagland 622'*, 6227 

«. Holmes ' 80819 

V. Huntley 25728 

V. Park 2126, 528 

V. Sheehan 808" 

Mattliewson v. Burr 25787 

Matthis V. State 978« 

Mattice v. Allen 97888 

Mattison v. Chicago, &c, R. R. 808'' 

Mattox V. U. S. 470* 

Mauerman w. Siemerts 528 

May V. State 588l^ 58826, 978" 

Mayer v. Dean 8O821 

Mayes v. State 39118 



Mayliew v. Thayer 

Mayo IK Dwight 

— - V. Foley 62216 

Mayor, &c. of Baltimore v. State 2126 

Mayor, &c. of N. Y. v. Second Ave. 

R. R. Co. 463", 46382 

Maysville, &e. R. R. v. Pellam 80828 

Maxham v. Place 622* 

Maxwell u.Hill 391** 

V. Wilkinson 978', 9788 

McAllister v. McAllister 122968 

McAmore v. Wiley 9105, 9106, 910?, 9IO8, 

91026 

McAndrews v. Santee 
McBride v. People 
MoCall V. U. S. 
McCamant v. Roberts 
McCartee v. Camel 
McCarthy v. Burtis 
McCarty v. CoflBn 
MoCathern v. Bell 
McCausland v. Fleming 
McColloch V. Gore 
McClaugherty v. Cooper 
McClerkin y. State 
McCloskey v. Davis 
McClure v. Pursell 
McCombs V. Foster 
McCormick v. Cheevers 

V. Herndon 

M'Cormick v. Sisson 
McCrady 1;. Jones 
McCraw v. Gentry 
MeCreary v. Turk 
M'Creary v. Grundy 
McCulIock V. Dobson 
M'Cutcheon v. M'Cutcheon 
McDaniel v. State 
McDonald v. Carnes 

V. Com. 

V. DeCairl 

V. McDonald 

V. Savoy 

V. Unaka Timber Co. 

V. Western R. R. 

McDonough v. O'Neil 
McDowell V. Preston 
McElmurray v. Turner 
McElwee Mfg. Co. v. Trowbridge 
McEwen v. Portland 



V. Shannon 

MoFarland v. Fricks 

V. Shaw 

McGhee, &c. Co. v. Hudson 
McGibbon v. Burpee 
McGinness v. Kennedy 
McGinnis v. Allison 
McGrath v. Seagrave 
McGregor v. Hudson 

V. MoArthur 

V. Montgomery 

V. Wait 

McGuire v. People 

. V. Say ward 
McHargue v. Com. 



5542 
4701S 
4121 
117931 
18385 

117987 

25788, 25787 

808" 

412" 

978*6 

1179i0 

1179" 

2769 

2761 

12296* 

80816 

80819 

525 

35812 

12297 

3586 

25783 

978*6 

257*9 

25780, 257*3 

46319 

25786 

2120 

1229**, 1229*56 

25735 

39162 

2138 

18327 
18327 

5546 

554" 

1832* 

91019 

117919, 117923 

4703 

2136, 2762 

358" 

80816 

12292a 

117986 

39160 

25783 

3582) 

122920 

9106, 91022, 910-23 

1179*6 

4709 



CCXXXVlll AMERICAN TABLE OF CASES. 

Referencee are to pages. 



21 
8085 
2578* 

2129 

8911S 
5885 



MoHugh V. Dowd 

V. Gallagher 

Mclntire v. Levering 

Mcintosh V. Lee 

Mclnturf v. State 

McKee v. People 

MoKeigue v. Janesville 39133, 39184^ 39135 

MeKenzie v. Stretch 276- 

McKeone v. Barnes 1229*5 

McKiel V. Real Estate Bank 21i3 

McKinley v. Irvine ' 122015 

McKinney v. Neil 978*6, 97360 

McKinnon v. Bliss 213^, 3582 

V. Norcross 391^^ 

McKivett V. Cone 9781, 9781'' 

McLane v. Johnson 8081" 

McLaughlin v. McDevitt 808^2 

McLean v. Clark 808^1 

V. McDonell 1179*2 

V. State 4705, 470", 91019 

McLellan v. Richardson 32221 

McLeod V. Ginther's Adm. 3911^ 391*1 

McMaster v. Scriven 62215 

McMath V. State 391*', 391*^ 

McMillan v. Baxley 35821 

McMurray v. St. Louis Oil Co. 80825 

McMurrin v. Kigby 391*7, 391*9 

McNeely v. Duff 9781 

McNeil V. O'Connor 4272 

McNeill V. Donohue 858' 

McNerney v. Beading 978^1 

McNichol V. Pacific Ex. Co. 2126 

McNutt V. McDonald 5642 

M'Nutt V. Young 257^3 

McPhail V. Johnson 978*3 

McPherson v. State 470i* 

McQueen v. People's Bank 2762 

V. State 47011 

McQuigan v. Delaware, &c. R. R. 3653 

McReynolds v. Longenberger 35812, 
122921, 122923 

McShane, Henry, Co. v. Padian 8085 

MeTaggart v. Thompson 391*" 

McVicker v. Conkle 1229", 1229" 

Meade v. Smith 62223 

Mealer v. State 910" 

Mears v. Cornwall 5541 

Mechelke v. Bramer 622i 

Medary v. Gathers 122912 

Medley v. People 391* 

Medway v. U. S. 122993, 122966 

Meeth v. Rankin Brick Co. 463", 46315 

Meguire v. Corwine 554* 

Meixsell v. Freezor 97831 

Melby v. Osborne & Co. 122957 

Melcher v. Flanders 1229" 

Mellish V. Robertson 808=5 

Melton II. State 6355, 635» 

Melvin v. Lyons 117919, 117920 

Merchants' Bank v. Hall 215 

V. McAnulty 80827 

V. McGraw 2116 

V. Morrison 80825 

Mercier v. Harnan 3581' 

Merkle v. Bennington 39125 



Merrifield v. Robbins 
Merrill v. Dawson 

V. Ithaca, &c. R. R. 

Merritt v. Straw 
Mershon v. State 
Merwin v. Arbuckle 

V. Ward 

Mewster v. Spalding 
Meyer v. School District 
Miami Turnpike Co. v. Baily 



5216, 117913 

2116 

978*, 978" 

1229*7 

257*6 

391*5 

18327 

117939 

117927 

365*, 36512, 

3651* 

Wil- 

80816 

■ 122926 

21 



2131, 521D, 52" 



Michigan Mut. Life Ins. Co. 

Hams 
Middleton v. Mass. 
Miles V. Edelen 

V. Loomis 1229*3, 122956, 122968, 122956 

Miller v. Brown 2573* 

V. Davis 80825 

V. Fletcher 8083 

V. Goodrich, &c. Co. 8087 

V. Hale 11793*, 117939, 117948 

V. Jones 18327, 122968, 122962 

V. MacVeagh 

V. Miller 

V. Palmer 

V. Proctor 

V. Reinhart 

ti. Shay 

V. State 25712, 4709_ 47918^ 5546'^ 53828 

V. Texas, &c. Ry. 213* 

Millington v. Millington 122966 

Million V. Com. 4701" 

Mills V. Duryee 117919 

Millsaps V. Merchant's, &c. Bank 8086 
Milmine v. Bnrnham 8082* 

Mima Queen v. Hepburn 39131 

Minis V. Sturdevant 978" 

V. Swartz 217, 218 

Minchin v. Minchin 8082» 

Mink V. State 62226 

Minneapolis, &c. R. R. i'. Home Ins. 

Co. 8081, 80811 

Minneapolis Times Co. v. Nimocks 35816 



1836 
117937 
4631*, 46316 



2138 
3587 

S9133 

39161 
35819 
365", 391** 
1179*6 



Minnesota v. Barber 
Minor v. Tillotson 
Mississippi, &c. R. R. v. Arispe 
Missouri, &c. R. R. v. Cocrehara 

V. Gernan 

V. Johnson 

Mitchell V. Bridgers 

V. Kingman 

V. Sawyer 97829 

Mitehum v. State 3918, 3919 

Mobile, &o. Ins. Co. v. McMillan 8087 
Mobile, &c. R. R. v. Ashcraft 25715 

Mobile & Birmingham R. R. v. 

Ladd 2129, 21*6 

Mobley v. Hamit 257*9 

Mockabee v. Com. 4701° 

Modawell v. Holmes 2127 

Moffet V. Moffet 2762 

Moffin V. Mtna. Axle, &c. Co. 218» 

Moffit V. Maness 8088 

V. Witherspoon 427* 

Moline-Milburn Co. v. Franklin 25713 



AMERICAN TABLE OP CASES. 
BeferenceB are to pages. 



CCXXXIX 



Moline Plow Co. v. Braden 2182 

Molyneaux v. Collier 554', 654' 

Monahan v. Worcester 257^^ 391*^ 

Money v. Turnipseed 21^2 

Montee v. Com. 52^ 

Montforton v. Bondit 808" 

Montgomery v. Allen 554' 

V. Bevans ISS^s 

V. Deeley 21' 

V. Pickering 622^^ 

V. Schockey 80825 

i;. State 4709, 470" 

Montgomery's Case 470^2 

Montjoy v. State 2123 
Moody V. Rowell 97826, 9785', gysss^ 1229*» 

Mooers v. Bunker ' 427^^ 

Moog V. Randolph 211" 

Mooney v. Kenuett 211^ 

V. Olsen 391", 391" 

Moore v. Cliicago R. R. Co. 978-32 



Gaus 

V. Gwynn 

V. Palmer 

■ V. Rush 

V. Smead 

V. State 

!,■. U. S. 

V. Wingate 

Moorman v. Collier 
Mora V. People 
Mordecai v. Beal 
Morehead v. State 
Moreland v. Lawrence 
Morelock v. State 
Morey v, Hoyt 
Morgan v. Burrow 

V. People 

V. Purnell 

V. Roberts 



5549 

52", 5216 

1229*8 

80825 

8089 

470*, 47010, 470" 

122952, 122960 

6221 

80825 

470*, 5881 

3588, 358", 35819 



25735 
47013 
358" 
2129 
358i« 
4273, 4276, 42712 
910" 



2573', 25739, 257*', 257^3_ 

4702, 4703, 4709 

5542 

4272 

39130 

. 427* 

1835 

46.3", 46316, 46318 

&c. Dock Co. 9781 

218 

21*0 



V. State 

Morrell v. Cawley 

V. Foster 

V. Morgan 

Morrill v. Foster 

V. Graham 

Morris !'. Briggs 

V. Columbian 

V. Davidson 

V. Edwards 

V. Leesee of Harmer 2132 

V. Pateliin 117926 

V. Wadsworth 1179*9 

Morrison v. Delorimier 9783* 

V. Jackson 3588, 358", 35822 

V. Sturges 1229^ 

Morrissey v. Ingham 2183, 39136 

Morrow v, Parkman 9101' 

Morse v. Congdon 4638 

V. Rice 808" 

V. Weymouth 522 

V. Woodworth 358i> 

Morss V. Morss 91015 

Morton V. State 391*5 

Moseley's Adm'r v. Mastin 2125 



Mosley v. Ins. Co. 213' 

V. Vermont, &e. Ins. Co. 2572* 

Moss V. Green 808' 

Mossman v. Forrest 2122 

Mowell V. Van Buren 6225, 622" 

Mudsill Mining Co. u. Watrous 25719 

Muldoon V. Deline 8086 

Mulhado v. Brooklyn City R. R. 3656 
MuUanphy Sav. Bank v. Schott 3589, 358i» 
Mullen V. Morris 117912, 1179" 

MuUer v. Dows 18319 

V. St. Louis Hospital Ass'n 97889 

Mullery v. Hamilton 4272 

Munn V. Burch 21* 

Munns v. Dupont 1229' 

Munroe v. Douglass 521'' 

Munshower v. State 2128, 21^9 



9782* 

6221 

2122 

5881, 58816 

588*, 5885, 588", 978" 

18325 

117936 

18339, 183*6 

11795 



Murphey v. State 
Murphy v. Com. 

V. Hendricks 

V. People 

V. State 

Murray v. Lepper 

V. Marsh 

V. Murray 

' V. Polglase 

Muse V. Richards 2122 

Musick V. Barney 117916 

Mutual Life, &c. v. Blodgett 427* 

V. Hillman 391*2 

V. Robinson 213* 

V. Tillman 39128 

Myer v. Grafflin 46321 

Myers v. Carrie 25738 

V. Knabe 39129 

Mynatt v. Hudson 257** 

Myron v. Union R. R. 808^3 

Naanes v. State 1179*8 

Nason v. Jordan 35815 

National Bank, &c. v. Gray 122921 

V. McManigle 18350 

National Car, &c. Builder w. Cyclone, 

&c. Co. 8081 
National Cash Reg. v. Pfister 8089, 808^1 
National Ulster Co. Bank v. Madden 978' 
Naumberg v. Young 808*, 808", 808" 

Neaderliouser v. State 213* 

Neal V. Neal 978" 

V. Patten 6226 

Neeb v. McMillan 978*6 

Neese v. Farmers Ins. Co. 216 



Nelms V. State 
Nelson v. Becker 

V. Davis 

V. Ladd 

V. State 

V. Weeks 

Nesbit V. State 
Nesbitt V. Cavender 
Neville v. Northcutt 
Nevin v. Ladue 
Newcomb v. Griswold 

V Wallace 

Newell V. Newton 



1229", 1229*8 
6226 
b0826 

2124 

521, 97814, 978-4 
808" 
470" 
80819 
46.38 
2188 
978*0 
8082* 
21" 



ccxl 



AMEKICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
References are to pages. 



Newell 7). Nichols 


183<" 


Ohleyer v. Bernheim 


80824 


Newhall v. Appleton 


2578 


Olive w. State 


25729 


V. Jenkins 


588" 


Oliver v. Pate 


62226 


New Haven Co. v. Goodwin 


4632", 463M 


Olmstead v. Hill 


24 


New Haven County Bank v. Mitchell 183« 


V. Winsted Bank 


97829 


New Jersey, &c. Co. v. Suydara 1179« 


Olson V. Peterson 


5547 


Newman v. Dodson 


39135 


Omnium Securities Co. 


V. Richard- 


V. Jenkins 


18335 


son 


5549 


New Milford v. Slierman 


391« 


Oppenheim v. Wolf 


2136 


New Portland u. Kingfield 


978« 


Ordway v. Conroe 


117921, 117983 


News Pub. Co. v. Butler 


978" 


V. Haynes 


97859 


New York Dry Dock v. Hicks 


117931 


Oregon Steamship Co. v. Otis 18353, 35316 


N. Y. Mutual,' &c. Ins. Co. <;. 


Arm- 


Orman v. State 


622' 


strong 


25719 


Orr V. Lacy 


215 


Nichols V. Haynes 


46.38 


Orton V. McCord 


6225, 6228 


V. Vinson 


46314 


Osborne v. Allen 


18334 


!.'. Webb 


46325 


V. Forsliee 


97826 


Nickerson v. Gould 


2182, 2183 


11. Stringham 


8081°, 80828 


V. Spindell 


3581' 


Ostrander v. Snyder 


80810 


Niles V. Sprague 


117931 


Otey V. Hoyt 


122944 


Nixon V. McKinney 257^8^ 


257«, 257" 


Ott V. Soulard 


219 


V. Palmer 


18331 


Over V. SchifHing 


21 


Noble V. Douglass 


1179*2 


Owen V. Boyle 


529, 52M 5214 


Norfolk, &c. R. K. o. Groseclose 3912* 


Owens ;;. Hull 


2115, 2116 


Norman v. Waite 


80826 


V. Kansas City, &c 


. R. R. 36512, 


Norris v. Cargill 


978'« 




36518 


V. Harris 


52", 5212 


V. State 


97818 


V. Ins. Co. 


276" 


Owers V. Olathe Co. 


35820 


North Bank v. Abbot 


4363' 


Owings V. Speed 


117941 


North Brookfield v. Warren 


4275, 4278_ 








4279 


Pabst Bkewing Co. v. 


Smith 1179" 


Northern Pac. E. K. v. Urlin 


97826, 97834 


Pacific Iron Works v. Newhall 808' 


Northwestern Fuel Co. „. Bruns. 808", 


Packard v. Dunsmore 


122916 




808" 


V. Hill 


117912, 117916 


Northwestern M'f g Co. v. Chambers 218" 


Paddock v. Salisbury 


25738 


Northrop, The 


2180 


Page V. Osgood 


27614 


Northrop v. Hale 427i, 427^ 


, 4275, 4276, 


V. Parker 39129, 


39180, 39131 97826 


4278, 


42712, 42713 


Pagett V. Curtis 


2128 


Norton v. Ladd 


910", 91012 


Paige V. Carter 


9781, 9785, 978' 


V. Perkins 


97840 


Paine c. Schenectady 


21" 


Norvell v. Mc Henry 


2128 


Palmer v. Aldridge 


2115 


Norwood V. Kenfield 


97829, 9783D 


V. Atchison, &c. E. 


R. 6212 


Noyes v. Ward 


412M 




97849 


Nunes v. Perry 


1229*9 


V. State 


58826 


Nunne v. Mayes 


4275 


Pancake v. Cauffman 


80819 


Nute V. Nute 


978« 


Pape V. Wright 


25746 


Nye V. McDonald 


216 


Papin V. Ryan 


218 






Parent v. Walmsley's Adm. 213 






Parish u. Perham 


8088 


Oak Leather Co. o. Union Bank 521^ 


Parke v. Mears 


12297 


Oakes v. Harrison 


2762, 27610 


Parker v. Carter 


6224, 62210, 62212, 


Oaks V. Weller 


188" 




62214, 62215 


Ober V. Blalock 


1179T 


!!. Cleveland 


117946 


O'Blenis v. State 


26736 


V. Davis 


SOS'^i 


O'Brien v. Com. 


25713 


!.'. Enslow 


3659 


V. Frasier 


25784 


V. Hardy 


24 


V. Krockinski 


2122 


V. Logan 


80820 


Ocean Ins. Co. v. Fields 


219 


V. State 9105, 


910', 91024, 97828 


O'Connor v. Chicago, &c. R. R. SQl" | 


Parkhurst v. McGraw 


18323, 622' 


Odiorne v. Bacon 


117938 


V. Van Courtlandt 


8083 


Ohio V. Hinchman 


21" 


Parkinson v. Nashua 


2578 


Ohio Life Ins. Co. i/. Debolt 


2181 2183 


Parliman ik Young 


3585 


Ohio & Miss. R. R. v. Wheeler 18319 | 


Parsons v. State 


6364 


Ohio R. Co. V. Ridge 


2112 


Partin v. State 


9105 


Ohlert V, Alderson 


8082 


Patohen v. Park 


97836 



AMEEICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
Bef erences are to pages. 



ccxli 



Patrick v. Gibbs 


117920 


People V. Denby 


978*2 


V. Hallett 


528 


V. Devines 


978*5, 978*6 


V. Jack 


4638 


II. Dillwood 


97885, 978*8 


Patten v. Glover 


6225 


V. Dimock 


2578 


V. Moor 


622W 


• V. Dohring 


91015, 91016 


Patterson v. Com. 


6356 


V. Elyea 


97812 


V. M'Causland 


2129 


V. Estrado 


688* 


Pattison v. Norris 


55418 


V. Etting 


2112 


Pavey v. Pavey 


1229" 


V. Evans 


25732, 6358, 635* 


Pawashiok, The 


5211, 1179W 


V. Everhardt 


257" 


Payne v. Treadwell 


2121 2181, 18346 


V. Fair 


25729, 25789 


V. Troy & Boston R. R. 62* 


V. Plynn 


68815 


Peace v. Jenkins 


4523 


V. Fulton Fire Ins 


Co. 4272 


Peagler v. Stables 


80819 


V. Garbutt 


2766, 27018 


Peak V. State 


470" 


V. Glenn 


4702, 4705, 47017 


Pearl v. Allen 


1229^ 122912 


V. Gondalez 


3588, 36521), 36522 


Pearson v. Darrington 


3918", 39181 




97826 


Peck V. Beckwith 


80824 


V. Green 


97813 


V. Clark 


4128 


V. Grunzig 


470", 47018 




80821 


V. Hanifaa 


97858 




463i» 


V. Hawes 


4701 


V. Ritchey 


978*4, 978*6 


V. Hayes 


622* 


V. Ryan 


5546 


V. Hite 


97889 


V. Valentine 46321 


, 9781, 9787, 97811 


V. Hodgdon 


391*8, 47012 


Peek V. Boone 


62211 


V. Hoy Yen 


58823 


Pell V. Ball 


183*8 


V. Hughes 


62223 


Peltier's Case 


211 


V. Hulbut 


62221 


Pelton V. Schmidt 


6547 


V. Jacobs 


97821 


Pelzer M't'g Co. v. Sun Eire Office 358^ 


V. Johr 


2119 


Pence v. Makepeace 


5548 


V. Jones 


2576 




62216 


V. Keeley 


97812 


Penitentiary Co. v. Gordon 2761" 


V. Keith 


9785* 


Penn. Co. v. Conlan 


52* 




9781 


V. Dolan 


80822 


V. Knapp 


25788 


V. Horton 


2121 


V. Knickerbocker 


47019 


V. Newmeyer 


3658, 3659, 97836 


V. Lambert 


529 


Penn. R. R. v. Lyons 


3911' 


V. Langtree 


91020 


Penn. R. R. Co. v. Right 


er 523 


V. Linzey 


9106, 9108, 91023 


Pensecola R. R. v. SchafEer 3581^ 


V. Lock Wing 


257*3 


People V. Alden 


11793* 


V. Machim 


97818 


V. Anderson 


97885 


V. Mackinder 


58828 


V. Atkinson 


62215, 622" 


V. Mather 


97825, 97826 


V. Austin 


97852 


V. Matteson 


91018 


V. Barrie 


6881* 


V. McConnel 


2124 


V. Barringer 


8081 


V. McCrea 


391*6 


V. Biddleman 


122988 


V. McGloin 


58816 


V. Blakeley 


6227 


V. M'Garren 


910", 91012, 910" 


V. Boscovitch 


978", 97822, 9782* 


V. McNair 


91023 


V. Brooks 


2183, 97852 


V. McQuaid 


529, 5213. 5216 


V. Buchanan 


62213, 97853 


V. Meservey 


39184 


V. Buddensieck 


3658, 365i7_ 36518 


V. Methvin 


257*8 


V. Bush 


25781 


V. Mills 


25785, 267*", 9785* 


V. Carney 


365*, 3655 


V. Minck 


1179*9 


V. Cassidy 


58826 


V. Moett 


25739 


V. Chapleau 


58815 


V. Murphy 


978*5 


V. Chase 


47011 


V. O'Brien 


6358 


V. Chee Kee 


2128, 2129 


V. O'Neil 


6355 


V. Clarke 


5881° 


V. O'SuUivan 


2576, 39148 


!). Cole 


97881 


V. Palmer 


97812 


V. Copsey 


91012, 978*8 


V. Park 


91021 


V. Corey 


122981, 122955 


V. Parker 


122954 


V. Costello 


635*, 6355 


V. Parton 


5882 


V. Court 


97835 


V. Perry 


470" 


w. Daniels 


5882 


V. Pinckney 


122957 


V. Dayis 


257*9 25755, 4708 


V. Potter 


2112 



ccxlii 



AMERICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
Befereuces are to pages. 



People V. Quanstrom 


91019 


V. Ramirez 


68812, 58816 


1'. Rector, &c. of Trinity Church 1229= 


V. Robinson 


68818 


V. Boderigas 


183^2 


V. Safford 


978" 


V. Sanchez 


4709 


V. Schryver 


2761 


i.'. Severance 


12295S 


V. Shea 


391« 


V. Simonsen 


6889 


V. Simpson 


4706 


V. Skeehan 


978^6 


V. Smith 


9106 


V. Soto 


58810, 58826 


V. Stokes 


1837 


V. Strybe 


6355 


V. Superior Court of N 


. Y. 2* 


V. Sutherland 


978*2 


V. Thrall 


6889 


V. Tyler 


25761 


V. Vernon 


39113, 4706 


V. Wells 


6351 


V. Wentz 


688S 588" 


V. Westbrook 


91020 


V. White 


25729, 25738 


V. Williams 


2131, 97840 


v. Wolcott 


58819, 588M 




391" 


V. Young 


62222 


Peoria, &c. R. R. v. Rice 


36.59 


Pepper v. Barnett 


12292T, 122928, 




12293°, 122932 


Perdicaris v. Trenton City Bridge 


Co. 


21" 


Perfelling v. State 


8914' 


Perkins v. Concord R. E. 


39186, 5547_ 




5549, 56411 


V. West 


80819 


Perrin v. State 


3589 


Perry v. Dubuque S. W. E. 


Co. 23 


V. Hill 


808' 



■ V. Moore 978*6 
V. New Orleans, &c. R. Co. 2112 

■ V. Newton 1229'''6 

V. Randall 6221, 6222 

V. Simpson Waterproof Mgf. 

Co. 554" 

V. State 62210, 622" 

Peter v. Thickstun 39162 

Peterhoff, The 21', 2180 

Peterson, Ex parte 2124 

Peterson v. Morgan 25738, 25788 

V. State 527 

l>,'trie V. Columbia, &c. E. R. 39128 

IVuffli V. Davis 80819 

I'l'vroux V. Howard 213* 

riielan v. Gardner 8O821 

Plienix, &c. Ins. Co. v. Merchants, 

&c. Ass'n 3583 



!'. Shoemaker 

Philadelphia i;. Rule 



6221 
3658 



Phillips V. Kelly S918* 

V. People 25716, 26720 

V. State 6356 

D. Trowbridge Furniture Co. 3589, 

35818 
Phoinix Ins. Co. v. Moog 18326, 18328 

Phoenix Pub. Co. Riverside v. Cloth- 



Philadelphia, &c. R. R. V. Lehman 2129 
V. Stimpson 391*3, 97388^ 97334 



iug Co. 


808" 


Pickard v. Bailey 


621S, 1179" 


Pierce v. De Long 


122968 


V. Hoffman 


257" 


V. Indseth 


212, 216^ 529 


V. Kimball 


2110 


V. Newton 


267" 


V. Northey 


1229*8, 1229" 


V. Pierce 


5546 


V. State 


521 


Pierson v. Baird 


2110 


Pike V. Crehore 


117927 


Pillard v. Dunn 


122929 


Pillow V. Thomas 


6222 


Pillsbury v. Locke 


463", 46318 


Pinkham v. Benton 


9788 


V. Cockell 


122936, 122967 


Pinney v. Jones 


3918 


Pinney's Will 


39140 


Pirie v. Wyld 


5548, 5549 


Pitt V. Emmons 


35818 


Pitts V. Allen 


80824 


0. State 


5882, 5886 


Pittsford V. Chittenden 


62229 


Pizarro, The 


18326 


Plank Road Co. v. Bruce 183** 


Piatt V. Haner 


1179M 


Plummer v. Currier 


5541, 66412 


V. Eastern E. E. 


52* 


V. Ossipee 


257*1, 3918* 


Polk V. Butterfield 


529 


Pollock V. Pollock 


97826 


V. Willcox 


35820 


Pool I'. Chase 


80810 


Porath V. State 


635*, 6358 


Porter v. Hale 


35820 


V. Judson 


216, 46326 


V. State 


97818, 978", 97819 


V. Waltz 


3912 


V. Waring 


2115 


V. Wilson 


122926 


Portugal, Church v. Hubbart 212 


Post V. Supervisors 


117913 


Potter V. Inhabitants of Ware 91 0", 




91018 


1). Mellin 


5641 


Pougade v. Ryan 


216 


Powell V. Blackett 


12297 


V. Governor 


39162 


V. Tarry 


5541 


V. Wallace 


3588 


Power V. Bowdle 


2126 


Powers V. McKenzie 


1229« 


V. Presgroves 


25783, 25738, 257*6, 




25768 


V. Russell 


27610 


Prairie School Township v. Haselen 




80810, 808" 



AMERICAN TABLE OP CASES. 
References are to pages. 



ccxliii 



Prather v. Palmer 


18331 


Ray V. Blackwell 


8086 




358" 


V. Castle 


46329, 46332 


Pratt V. Andrews 


257^ 


Raynham v. Canton 


117912 


V. Langdon 


8082" 


Raynor v. Lyons 


80819 


V. White 


46313, 46323 


Head V. Com. 


62228 


Preeper v. Eeg. 


526 


Real V. People 


978*", 978« 


Prell V. McDonald 


2111 


Re Assignment of Eea 


35812 


Prescott V. Ward 


978" 


Redfield v. Gleason 


8087, 80815 


Price V. Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Co. 21^9 


Redlich u. Baurlee 


4631* 


V. Garland 


4638, 46319 


Reed v. Wilson 


21', 2129 


V. Richmond, &c. E. R 


35812 


Reese i;. Reese 


122931 


V. State 


68812 


V. Strickland 


80823 


w. Torrington 


4639 


Reeve v. Dennett 


2183 


Priest V. Glenn 


117928 


V. Liverpool, &c. Ins. 


Co. 2762 


Primm v. Stewart 


1833*, 39151 


Reeves v. State 


3582 


Prince v. Blackburn 


122919 


R. V. Andrews 


635* 


V. Smith 


463', 46322 


V. Beckwith 


635*, 6358 


Pringle v. Pringle 


91019 


V. BcSrub^ 


9102i 


Printup V. Patton 


6542 


V. Chasson 


25712, 2572) 


Prior V. State 


2575 


V. Doyle 


58821 


Proctor V. Houghtaling 


25738 


V. Mailloux 


183*, 97851 


V. Old Colony R. R. 


554*, 5545 


V. Pah-Mah-Gay 


9101* 


Pruitt V. Cox 


25737 


V. Peltier 


47012 


Puckett V. State 


2113, 25737 


V. Perry 


6355 


PuUen V. Hutchinson 


12295 


V. Reaney 


47012 


Pullman Palace Car v. Harkins 97853 




588" 


Purdy V. Purdy 


91019 


V. Smith 


4706, 4709 


Pusey V. Wright 


2762 


V. Sparham 4706, 4701", 47011 


Putnam v. Goodall 


3589 


V. The Minnie 


219 






Reid V. McWhinnie 


2127, 2138 


QniMBT V. Buzzell 1229^, 


1229", 122915 


V. Reid 

V. Warner 122927 


25752 
, 122935, 1229*2 






Reinhart v. Miller 


122915 


Radcuffb v. Ins. Co. 


11792, 1179* 




808* 


RadclyfEe v. Barton 


5542 


Reis V. Hellman 


5542 


Rader v. McElvane 


80819 


Reitz V. State 


3655 


Radford v. State 


4705 


Renaud v. Abbott 


21" 


Radley ti. Seider 


97812 


Renier v. Dwelling-house 


80828 


Railing v. Com. 


4703 


Renner v. Bank of Columbia 35813 


Railroad v. Crider 


276" 


Rex V. Clewes 


257'2 


Railway Co. v. Beeler 


808» 


V. Inhabitants of Harringworth 122912 


V. Cronin 


35818 


V. Morgan 


122966 


V. Henderson 4632=, 46328, 46333 


V. Oneby 


1838 


V. Herrick 


391*2 39146 


V. Plummer 


1837 


0. McKenna 


522 


Reyburn v. Belotti 


122937, 122938 


V. Murphy 


46311, 46318 


Reynolds v. Longenberger 


18317 


V. S trout 


52* 


V. Manning 


5547, 5548 


V. Whitton 


18319 


r. Robinson 


80826 


Rains v. State 


58826 


V. Schaffer 


91029 


Rainwater ;;. Elmore 


57815 


Rhoades v. Selin 


1179*9, 122929 


Ralph V. Brown 


35819 


Ricard v. Williams 


183*8 


Ralston v. Miller 


41219 


Rice V. Rice 


6226 


Rand V. Dodge 


4522 


V. Shook 


2139 


Randal v. Yates 


6228 


Rice's Succession 


5210 


Randall v. Connecticut River R. R. 52* 


Rich V. Eldredge 


463' 


'.-. Turner 


8087 


Richards v. Day 


80826 


Randolph v. Loughlin 


122955, 122961 


V. Elwell 


18315 


V. Woodstock 


978*7 


V. Noyes 


5547, 5.'i4i9 


Rapley v. Klugh 


80819 


Richardson v. Beebe 


80819, 80811 


Ratliff V. Vandikes 


91019 


V. Boston 


4283 


Raw V. People 


2139 


V. Emery 


463*. 46313 


Rawley v. Brown 


1832* 


V. Kelley 


97R« 


Raw Manf'g Co. v. Townsend S5812 i 


V. Milburn 


218*, 358* 


Rawson v. Haigh 


39138 


V. Newcomb 


1229*9 


Ray V. Bell 


978** 


V. Robbins 


3582* 



ccxliv 



AJVIEKICAN TABLE OP CASES. 
BefereuceB are^to pages. 



Richmond v. Patterson 




117929 


Rogers v. State 


2122, 91016 


Kichmond, &c. li. li 


V. 


Childress 36611, 


V. Straub 


8082, 8085 






3tj 


&12, 3651S, 86516 


V. Tyley 


122952 


Eiddle v. Hudgiiis 






808i» 


Roll V. St. Louis Smelting 


Co. 5211 


Kidgeley v. Johnson 






122922, 122924 


Rollins V. Henry 


1179'fi 


Kiemer v. Rice 






808* 


Ronan v. Dugan 


2130 


Riggs V. Powell 


122921 


, 122935, 122953 


Roop V. Clark 


117921,117927 


Riley v. Johnston 






622" 


Roosa V. Boston Loan Co. 


39136 


V. Mayor 






80811 


Root V. King 


117913 


V. Pierce 






41211 


Rose V. Eirst Nat. Bank 


1229", 122958, 


V. Treanor 






8081* 




122961 


liindge V. Breok 






4635 


V. Otis 


97846, 978" 


V. Walker 






46326 




122945 


liililey V. Seligman 






. 80820 


Roseboom v. Billington 


4525 


v. Warren 






212B 


Rosenbaum v. State 


3913 


Risk c. State 






3655 


Rosenkrans v. Barker 


25734 


Ritchie v. Catlin 






2186 


Rosenthal v. Walker 


18350 


y. Holbrooke 






62224 


Ross V. Austin 


2122, 2181 


Rixford V. Miller 






18331 


V. Boswell 


2129 


Robb V. Hewitt 






55418 




91016 


Robbins v. Robbins 






6354 


V. State 


2576, 3912 


V. Springfield 






978=6 


V. White 


39128 


V. State 






521, 47018 


Roten V. State 


47014 


Robert's Appeal 






5542 


Rothrock v. Perkinson 


117912 


Roberts v. Com. 






97815, 97839 


Roupell V. Haws 


122966 


V. Dixon 




2572, 3589, 35818 


Rousey v. Wood 


2112, 117936 


V. Miller 






97838 


Rout V. Riley 


122959 


V. MuUenix 






80827 


Eowell V. Fuller 


122944, 122948 


V. Ogdensburg, 


&c 


.E 


E. 3658 


V. Newton 


8083 


Robertson v. Lynch 






35815 


Rowt V. Kile 


122954 


V. Miller 






1229« 


Royal V. Chandler 


4128 


Robinson v. Adams 






39139 


Royal Ins. Co. v. Schwing 


2762, 27614 


V. Blakely 






42713 


Ruan V. Perry 


25728 


V. Chadwick 






6222 


Rudd V. Erank 


6225 


V. Cutter 






35818 


Rudolph V. Lane 


35820 


«. Dana 






91022 


Rufer V. State 


S8826 


V. Dibble 






4633, 46319 


Rullman v. Barr 


3589 


V. Gallier 






183''2 


Huloff V. People 


3652" 


V. Oilman 




212, ]n92_ 117911 


Euniph V. State 


122927 


V. Hyers 






8086 


Rusch V. Rock Island 


9781 


u. Hutchinson 






978" 


Rusher v. State 


68828 


V. New Brunsw 


ickE. 


R. 25724 


Russell V. Buckley 


18349, 18350 


V. Peru, &c. R. 


R. 




97853 


V. Church 


80810 


I'. Reynolds 






97829 


V. Martin 


2126 


V. Robinson 






2765 


V. Sargent 


2124 


i: State 






257*5, 257*9 


Ryan v. O'Conner 


80820 


■ V. Stuart 






5541, 5543 


V. People 


97847 


Rocco V. State 






62223 


V. State 


588' 


Roche !'. Praser 






2762 


Ryerson v. Abington 


97848 


Rockey's Estate 






122959 






Rockwell V. Taylor 






39126 






Rockwood V. Poundstone 


97829, 97830 


Sahlinger v. People 


18329 


Roden v. Brown 






35812 


St. Louis, &c. R. R. V. Dearborn 80828 


Roderigas v. East 


River 


Savings 


V. Dobbins 


36512 


Instn. 






■ 18338 


«. Rexroad 


91019 


Rodgers v. Crook 






35820 


V. Sweet 


97847 


Kodrian v. N. Y. &c. 


R 


R. 


524 


V. Thomas 


5544 


Rodriguez v. Espinosa 




391« 


V. Weaver 


629, 5218 


Roe V. Hoe 






12295' 


St. Paul, &c. Ins. Co. 0. Gotthelf 97825 


Rogers v. Crain 






39130 


St. Vrain Stone Co. v. Denver, &c. 


V. De Bardeleben. &c. Co. 39180, 42710, 


R. R. 


8082 








42713 


Salazar v. Taylor 


122927, 122982 


V. Lyon 






6228 


Salem Gravel Road Co. v. 


Penning- 


V. Mexia 






11790 


ton 


89129, 39181 


V. Ritter ]22928,122932,1229«,1229«2 


Salomon v. State 


2137 



AMERICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
References are to pages. 



ccxlv 



Saltsman v. N. Y. &c. R. R. 


80812 


Sample v. Frost 


6229 


Sampson v. Noble 


n79'0 


V. Overton 


1179** 


Sara Sloan, The 


18325 


Sanborn v. Murphy 


808** 


Sanchez v. People 


978-27 


Sanders v. Keister 


3918* 


V. State 


978*" 


V. Stokes 


218* 


V. Wakefield 


9781, 9789 


Sands v. State 


68824 


Sankey v. Cook 1229*2, 1229*5, 1229" 


Santa Ann «. Harlin 


978*3 


Santissima Trinidad 


213 


Sarahass v. Armstrong 


2131 


Sarbach v. Jones 


9102, 91011 


Sargent v. Hampden 622*, 


622", 62215 


Sartorius v. State 


97820 


Sasscer v. Farmers' Bank 


21', 9788 


Sauls V. State 


5885 


Saussy v. R. R. 


2573' 


Savannah, &c. R. R. v. Gray 


18326 


V. Holland 


3912* 


Saveland v. Green 


35816, 5543 


Sawyer v. Eifert 


25733 


V. Erbert 


25739 


Sayres v. Allen 


9783S 


Scales V. Desha 


89129 


Schaller v. State 


25730 


Schaser v. State 


257* 



Scheffler v. Minneapolis, &c. R. R. 2129, 

2189 

Schell V. Plumb 978*5, 9785s 

Schlaff V. Louisville, &c. R. R. Co. 391^" 
Schlater v. Winpenny 978** 

Schlenoker v. State 9785* 

Schlicht V. State 21S8 

Schloss V. His Creditors 2* 

Schmidt v. N. Y. &c. Ins. Co. 2572" 

V. State 2765 

Schnertzell v. Young 1179** 

Schoen v. Sunderland 80816 

School Dist. V. Ins. Co. 21", 2125, 2139 

V. Tuttle 117918 

School Furniture Co. v. Warsaw 

School Dist. 52' 

Schriedley v. State 2571" 

Schroeder v. Chicago, &o. R. R. 365i° 
365", 3651* 
Sehubkagel v. Dierstein 6229 

Sehuchardt v. Aliens 218* 

Schultz V. Chicago, &c. R. R. 808" 



Schuylkill Co. v. Copley 


91021 


Scofield V. Parlin, &c. Co. 


183«, 55412, 




55413 


Scoggin V. Dalrymple 


412* 


Scotia, The 


21*, 2131 


Scotland, The 


215 


Scott V. Fletcher 


25728 


!i. Hillensburg 


62225 


V. Jackson 


2118 


V. Waithman 


122921 


V. Wood 


276" 


Scoville V. Baldwin 


18326 



Scroggin *. McClelland 


5212 


V. Wood 


80821 


Searcy v. State 


588i», 58816 


Seargeaut v. Seward 


91018 


Searls v. Kiiapp 


2122 


Sears v. Hayt 


391* 


Seavy v. Dearborn 


2761, 276", 978*5 


Sebree v. Dorr 


358SI, 358" 


Secor V. Pestana 


6541, 5544 


Secrist v. Green 


11793-! 


V. Petty 


2123,211' 


Seef V. State 


68821 


Seeley v. Engell 


52' 


Seguin v. Rochon 


978*9 


Seiber v. Price 


8082' 


Seip's Estate. Probst's 


Appeal 6225 


Selden v. Myers 


8082 


V. State 


6222 


Selsers Estate 


8081 


Semple v. Hagar 


218 


Sentell >/. State 


97839 


Serviss v. Stockstill 


8082 


Settle V. Alison 


117920, 117922 


Seventh Day, &c. Ass'n 


V. Fisher 46322 



Seward v. Garlin 
Seymour v. Cowing 
Shafer v. Lacock 

V. State 

Shaffer v. McCrackin 
Sliaffner v. Cora. 
Shafter v. Evans 
Shailer v. Bumstead 
Shaller v. Brand 
Shanfelter v. Baltimore 
Shank v. Coulthard 
Shaw V. Bryant 

V. Emery 

V. State 



3586 

80826 

391" 

2766 

46310 

25713 

526 

39139, 39140^ 39141 

122921, 1229-4 

2115 

80823 

1229=6 

25736 

2113 



V. Susquehanna Boom Co. 39129 

Sharp V. Johnson 18B38 ,183*6 

Shearer v. State 276' 

Shearman v. Akins 4522 
Shelburne Falls Nat. Bk. v. Townsley 18351 

Shelton v. Hampton 97826, 97829 

V. State 62220 

Shepard «. Giddings 35819 

V. Mo. &c. R. R. 36512, 3651', 36515 

Shepardson v. Perkins 2761* 

Shephard v. State 58825 

Shepherd v. Busch 8O810 

Sherff V. Jacobi 8O821 

Sherman v. Crosby 4522 

Sherrell v. Murray 2115 

Sherwood v. Houston 39129, 117921 

Shields v. Cunningham 978*=, 978*6 

Shifflet V. Com. 58818 

Shirwin v. People 25736 

Shoemaker v. kellog 46313 

0. Stiles 80810 

Shoenberger v. Hackman 35820, 35322 
Shorb V. Kinzie 1229*3 
Shorey r. Hussey 9782' 
Shove V. Wiley 46326, 46331, 9734, 9737 
Shown r. Barr 117923 
y. McMackin. 18333 



ccxlvi 



Shrowders v. Harper 
Sliroyer v. Miller 
Shubrick v. State 
Sluirtleff V. Parker 
Shutte V. Thompson 
Sibley v. Smith 
V. Waffle 



AMEEICAN TABLE OP CASES. 
Befereuces are to pages. 



122925 
2573* 
212s 
978*5 
41210 
355^', 36513 
62213 



Sidekum v. Wabash, &c. R. R. 36512, 36513 

Sill 1:. Keese 1229« 

Silliman v. Thornton 521^ 

Simmons v. Trumbo 2130 

Simms v. Quebec, &c. R. R. 21" 

V. So. Express Co. 52i2 

Simon v. State 622^6 

Simons v. Norton 1179** 

V. I'eople 47011 

V. State 52^ 

Singer Mfg. Co. v. Clay 1229« 122953 

-, — V. Leeds 463" 

V. McFarland 1229*2 

Sitler V. Gehr 40327 

Skelton v. Light & Power Co. 978« 

Skinner v. Skinner 91018 

Skipworth v. Deyell 463ii, 46.315, 46316 

Slattery v. People 5545, 5835 

Slaughter ;;. Bernards 117932 

Sleeper v. Van Middlesworth 257** 

Sloan V. N. York Central 978**, 978*6, 



V. Thompson 1229W, 12291' 

Slocovich V. Oriental Mut. Ins. Co. 2139 



Slossen v. R. R, 
Sluby V. Champlin 
Small V. Clewley 
Smith V. Allen 

V. Asbell 

V. Blagge 

V. Brown 

V. Butler 

V. CoflSn 

V. Com. 

V. Groom 

V. Cushman 

V. Ehanert 

V. Elder 

V. Fenner 

V. Fitzgerald 

V. Forrest 

V. Fowler 

V. Geer 

V. Gillnm 

V. Kander 

I'. Knowlton 

V. Lane 

V. Lang 

V. Metropolitan R. R. 

!'. Moore 

V. Mussetter 

V. N. B. Society 267", 39128 

V. Nowells 41211 

V. Old Colony, &o. R. R. 267i», 267^5 

V. Palmer 5542 

V. Patterson 427' 

>!. Potter 117912 

V. Powers 11795 



25725 

I229W 

276W, 27612 

3589 

I2291'', 122915 

117y22, 117926 

35812, 35815 

80825 

91012, 91013 

39161, 5889 

183*3 

1179*3 

978'" 

II791" 

122929 

8081 

4129 

5541* 

42718 

27611 

117919 

18336 

46389, 46381, 97811 
80819 
978*8 
276* 



Smith V. Putnam 

V. Redden 

V. Rentz 

V. Royalton 

V. Sanford 

V, Satterlee 

V. Savings Bank 

«. Shell 

V. Smith 

V. Speed 



391*, 463-20 

117919 

46320 

978*5 

463", 46315 

5547 

62215 

554', 55419 

18385, 18337, 1179** 

2131, 2183 



V. State 257*5,3582,3586,47010,58827, 
97815, 978** 

V. Stevens 2132 

V. Swan 122921 

V. West 1179** 

V. Whittier 39181, 39143, 5547 

V. Zent 276' 

Smitha v. Flournoy's Adm. 2120, 2121 
Smoot V. Russell 52i2 
Sneider v. Patterson 8085 
Snodgrass v. Com. 97855 
Snow V. Alley 80815 
V. Grace 257**, 257*9 



Snyder v. Snyder 


97825 


V. State 


5883 


Soaps V. Eichburg 


5542 


Societa Italiana ;;. Sulzer 


80817 


Solary v. Webster 


8085 


Solita V. Jarrow 


122965 


Solomon v. Dreschler 


2766 


V. Hughes 


2115 


Solomon, &c. R. R. v. Jones 


978-', 9787, 




9788 


Solver V. Romanet 


2121 


Somers v. State 


2110 


V. Wright 


46321 


Somerville v. Wimhish 


2118 



Somerville, &c. R. R. i;. Doughty 97858 
Sophia. The 808" 

Soule V. Bruce 25726 

South Kans. R. R. Co. v. Robbins 25735 
South & N. Ala. R. R. Co. v. Wood 2137 
Southern Bell Tele. Co. v. Lynch 36512 
Southern Express Co. v. Thornton 122935 
Southern, &c. Ins. Co. v. Wilkinson 427' 
S. W. School District of Bolton v. 



Williams 
Southwick V. Southwick 
Southworth v. Hoag 
Spaids V. Barrett 
Spalding v. Lowe 
Sparf V. U. S. 
Sparhawk v. Sparhawk 
Sparks v. Com. 

V. Sparks 

Spaulding v. Hood 

V. Vincent 

Spaunhorst v. Link 
Spearman v. State 
Spears v. Burton 

V. Forrest 

V. International Ins. Co. 

V. Lawrence 

Speer v. Coate 
Spencer v. Curtis 



4122 

6222 

2761 

80820 

91017 

588*, 58815 

91021 

391** 

2126, 2762, 6225, 6228 

276" 

62", 117910, 117914 

978*6, 978*9 

5882* 



267*7 

25727 

35819 

4126, 4129 

2122 



AMERICAN TABLE OF CASES- 
Kefeiences are to pages. 



ccxlvii 



Spencer v. Fortescue 






39129 


State V. Brown 588' 


, 58828, 8088, 8089 


V. Langdon 


117920, 


117921 


V. Bruce 


5548, 5882 


V. New York, &c. E. E. 




391* 


V. Buffington 


6228 






183*1 


18336 


V. Burton 


5545 


Spengler v. Williams 






2139 


V. Cadwell 


622' 


Spohn V. Missouri, &c. E. E. 


978*5, 978« 


V. Cain 


3583, 39130 


Spradling v. Conway 






6222 


V. Cake 


1179**, 1179*5 


Spragins v. White 






522 


V. Caldwell 


470" 


Sprague v. Sprague 






122937 


V. Calhoun 


622* 


Springfield, &e. R. E. v 


Allen 




80810 


V. Callahan 


6356 


Squire v. State 






18333 


V. Cameron 


47015 


Stackus V. N. Y. R. R. 






523 


V. Carr 


58816, 122928 


Stager v. Pass. Ry. Co. 






52* 


V. Carrick 


5881, 58820, 58821 


Stallings v. Gottschalk 




463" 


80813 


V. Cass 


80821 


V. Hullum 






6223 


V. Center 470io, 47012, 47018, 470", 


V. State 






39150 




6228 


Stamper v. Griffin 




25787, 978" 


V. Central, &c. E. R 


35812 


Stanglein v. State 


II7916, 


1179" 


V. Chamberlain 


18828 


Staples V. Edwards, &c 


Co. 


808' 


, 8081* 


V. Chambers 


£881, 91020 








183*0 


V. Church 


2139 


V. Wellington 






80821 


V. City of Dubuque 


2115 


Stapleton v. King 






80810 


V. Clark 


391*', 117913 


Starkey v. People 






47010 


V. Clifford 


58815 


Starr v. Com. 






47012 


V. Clinton 


122958, 1229«i 


Starratt v. Mullen 






2762 


V. Clothier 


1179*2 


State V. Abbott 






2] 25 


V. Cole 


526 


V. Ah Chuey 






36520 


V. Colwell 


978" 


0. Aldrich 






4701* 


V. Cook 


910" 


V. Allen 






6355 


V. Cooper 


21" 


V. Alston 






257* 


V. Coupenhaver 


62223 


V. Anderson 


588M 


, 58813 


, 58826 


V. Crab 


635'; 9102*" 


u. Angelo 






978*6 


V. Crawford 


2766, 27618 


V. Archer 




2573' 


, 9785* 




5545 


V. Arnold 




365W 


, 470" 


V. Cronln 


4703 


y. Ayer 






6222* 


0. Croteau 


521 


V. Bailey 






2110 




2765 


V. Baker 






62221 


V. Crowson 


58810, 58825 


V. Baldwin 






978*' 


V. Daley 


25731 


V. Banister 






470* 


V. Danforth 


865* 


V. Banks 






39122 


V. Daniel 


47012 


V. Barber 






635* 


V. Darnell 


58812 


V. Bartlett 11793*, 11793', 


117938, 


V. David 


122961 








1179*0 


V. Dawson 


635* 


V. Beal 






257*6 


V. De Graff 


58815, 122961 


V. Beebe 




62220 


62221 


V. Delesdenier 


21" 


V. Behrman 






5883 


V. Denny 


2110 


V. Belcher 3912, 39i9_ 39i36_ 4702 


V. District Board 


2138 


V. Belknap 






588* 


V. Donelon 


978*5 


V. Belton 




91018 


910" 


V. Dooley 


58828 


V. Benner 62222 


97826 


97839 


978*5 


V. Dooris 


117913 


V. Berlin 






36518 


V. Douglass 


25781, 9105, 9106 


V. Blackburn 




47010 


470" 


V. Drake 


588", 588", 58821 


V. Blake 






391*6 


V. Duncan 


58826 


t,'. Blize 






6352 


;;. Dunwell 


2120 


V. Bloom 




25739, 25750 


V. Eddon 


470* 


V. Boswell 






257*6 


V. Edwards 5886, 


9101, 9109, 91022, 


V. Bowe 






5888 




9102* 


V. Bowen 






2123 


V. Elliotte 


47010, 47018, 47015 


V. Bowman 






588* 


V. EUwood 


978*3 


0. Boyd 






2132 




27618 


V. Branham 


5888, 588* 


58815 


I'. Fassett 


62220, 62221 


V. Brascamp 






2181 


V. Felts 


58812, 58818 


V. Britt 






3655 


V. Fitzhugh 


470', 47010 


V. Brookshire 




978" 


97828 


V. Fitzsimmous 


97813, 97819 


V. Broughton 






5882 


V. Folwell 


25715 



ccxlviii 



AMERICAN" TABLE OP CASES. 
Beferences are to pages. 



3 V. Foot You 




4706, 470", 47016 


State V. Kidd 




6227 


V. Ford 




2578» 


V. Kimball 




18380 


V. Fox 




391M 


V. Kindle 




4705, 47017 


V. Freeman 




391«, 978« 


V. King 


2578' 


, 25748, 3918 


V. Fritz 




122958 


V. Kingsbury 




97846 


V. Garrett 




36520, 58821 


V. Kinley 




■ 97846 


V. Garvey 




5888, 58822, 58826 


V. Kinney 




39147 


V. Gay 




122982, 1229« 


V. Knapp 25714, 25789, 


25740, 36517, 


V. Gedicke 




39186 






36518, 39147 


V. George 




5881, 58816, 9788 


V. Knowles 




5889 


V. German 




5882, 5889 


V. Koontz 




122961 


V. Gesell 




97820 


V. Langford 




910' 


V. Gile 




47010 


V. Lanier 




25746 


V. Oilman 




5888 


V. Lapage 




25714 


V. Glyndeu 




5881 


V. Lee Doon 




97817, 97822 


V. Glynn 




97861 


t'. Lewis 




18344, 97846 


V. Godwin 




62228 


V. Litchfield 




6355 


V. Goodwin 




978" 


V. Lowhorne 




58817 


V. Gorham 




58816, 58825 


V. Lull 




9780 


V. Gossett 




58819 


V. Madison 




5881, 58827 


V. Goyette 




2139 


V. Marion County Ct. 


2120 


V. Gray 




6228 


V. Martin 




97840 


V. Gregory 




3912 


V. Mayes 




97855 


V. Gurnee 




35818, 35824 


V. McAllister 




25782 


V. Habib 




58818 


V. McBryde 




527 


V. Hagan 


97818, 


978" 97819, 97823 


V. McClain 




39180 


V. Halstead 




3588 


V. McDonnell 




5882, 5886 


V. Hannibal, 


&c. E 


R. 18324 


V. McGahey 




97845, 97853 


V. Hansen 




58810 


V. MoGill 




35821 


V. Hargrave 




391" 


V. Medlicott 




4708, 47012 


V. Harper 




4708 


V. Mellican 




62223 


V. Harrison 




58820 


V. Merrill 




25729 


V. Harvey 




122927, 122988 


V. Mewherter 




62211 


V. Hastings 




122950 


V. Michael 9104, 9195 


, 9108, 91022, 


V. Hawn 




97846 






910'4 


V. Hayes 




2187, 6351 


V. Miller 


6354. 6856, 6358 


V. Hayward 




ess* 


V. Minnick 




2119 


V. Hazleton 




6226 


V. Mitchell 




58812 


V. Hedgepath 


622', 91018 


V. Molier 




6351 


y. Heed 




.6352 


V. Montgomery 




97836 


V. Henke 




18334, 183« 


i: Morris 




2128, 2129 


V. Hirsch 




2763 


V. Morrison 




2765 


V. Hodge 




521, 18330 


u. Moy Looke 




5210 


V. Hollenscheit 


588' 


V. Munson 




5889 


V. Hopkins 


358" 


46316, 46330, 97865 


V. Murfreesboro 




2112 


V. Horton 




3654, 3913 


V. Murray 




25786, 5886 


V. Howard 




3916, 5546, 58826, 


V. Nash 




47018 






9102, 91021 


V. NeiU 




91020 


V. Hoyt 




6228 


V. Nettlebush 




4706 


V. Hutchinson 


117942 


V. Niles 




3914', 39148 


V, Intox. Liq 


uors 


2126 


V. Nixon 




97847 


V. Jackson 




5216 


V. Nocton 




4709, 47014 


V. James 




622" 


V. Norris 




97881 


w. Jarrett 




218, 2111 


V. Northrup 




25731 


V. Jefferson 




25786 


V. Pearce 




9102' 


V. Joest 




4279 


V. Pennington 




2121, 91019 


V. Johnson 


2121, 


25782, 47010, 47014, 


V. Perkins 


2574', 25758, 5546 




470" 


58816, 58828, 97844 


V. Pettaway 




62226 


V. Jolly 




91020 


V. Phair 




46325, 46327 


V. Jones 


27613, 


89144, 39146, 39147 






91020 






4704, 58812, 58824 


V. Phillips 




5881 


V. Jordan 




978" 


V. Pike 




526 


V. Juneau 




9106 


V. Plym 


18388, 


18334, 18340 


V. Jurche 




521 


V. Pool 




4701 


V. Kelly 




18380 


V. Powers 




2120, 2121 



AMEEICAN TABLE OF CASES. 



ccxlix 



References are to pages. 



State V. Pratt 

V. Ragsdale 

V. Eawls 

V. Ray 

V. Raymond 

;;. Red 

V. Reed 

V. Rights 

V. Rodrigues 

V. Rogers 

V. Rood 

V. Rugan 

V. Russell 

V. Salge 

V. Saunders 

V. Sayers 

V. Schilling 

V. Scott 

V. Severson 

V. Seymour 

V. Shaffer 

V. Shaw 

V. Shelton 

V. Shuford 

V. Sibley 

V. Simon 

V. Smith 

V. Snow 

V. Soper 

V. Sparrow 9' 

V. Spence 

V. Stade 

V. Staley 

V. Stallings 

V. Stanley 

V. Staton 

V. Stebbins 

V. Stephen 

«. Sterrett 

V. Stokeley 

V. Streeter 

V. Sullivan 

V. Swayze 

— ^— V. Swift 

v. Tabor 

V. Talbert 

V. Tally 

V. Tatro 

V. Taylor 

!i. Terrell 

V. Thomas 

!'. Thompson 

!'. Tilghman 

V. Tompkins 

V. Trivas 

V. Turner 

V. Tweedy 

V. Twitty 

V. Ulrich 

V. Umble 

V. Underwood 

!;. Vaigneur 

V. Vann 



978« 
978" 
978« 

183M 18335, 358', 635" 

5881 

25786, 4701", 5545, 5884 

1833) 



58816 

529 

257*6 

4709, 6351 

9781'', 97820 

470*, 47016, 470" 



122961 

52" 

3586 

47016 

2766 

470* 

2574 

5884 

4788, 47012, 47014 

8654 

■ 521 

62226 

781', 97814, 97815, 9781', 

978" 

1229^7 

117913 

97844 

25746 

97862 

9787 

635S 6356 

528 

6224, 62215, 62214 

62224 

6356, 6357 

4706 

183' 

470W 

25720 

4706 

62212 

588" 

97837, 97840 

4706 

2578, 97818 

2138, 1229*9, 122954 

526 

122960, 122963, 122961, 

122968 

47014 

6221 

4706 

117911, 117912 

2123 

4701 

9109, 91010 

58821, 58825 

58826 



State V. Vaughan 

V, VoUander 

V. Wagner 



V. Walsh 

1'. Walters 

V. Walton 

V. Ward 

V. Warner 

V. Warren 

V. Watson 

V. Watt 

V. Walters 

V. Way 

V. Weiners 

V. Weldon 

V. Wells 

V. Wentworth 

V. Westfall 

V. White 

V. Whitson 

V. Whittier 

V. Whitworth 

V. Williams 

V. Wilner 

V. Wilson 

0. Wingo 

V. Winningham 

V. Winston 

^ V. Wood 

V. Woodruff 

V. Woodside 

V. Wright 

V. Zellars 

State Bank v. Curran 
Steamboat Co. t. Brockett 
Stearns v. Doe 

V. Hall 

V. Merchants' Bank 



47010 

91020 

214, 2120, 2188, 2140, 

4709 

97826 

2576, 257", 97844 

4705 

257', 97816, 1229", 1229*8 

3914' 

97889 

6354, 6358, 97840 

58812 

4272 

2576 

36519 

9102 

18328, 6354 

25716, 588" 

470', 91011 

62211 

4705 

910*, 9106, 91022, 91023 

97816 

2118, 470" 

18332 

1834', 4707, 4709, 47013 

276' 

58814 

58822 

3586, 46328, 62222, 6351 

"654 



910", 91018 
18348 
97816 
2119 
3912' 
35828 



97826, 97827, 



Stoddard v. Burton 
Stokes V. Dawes 

V. Macken 

V. People 

V. State 

Stone V. Hunt 

V. Ins. Co. 

V. State 

Stow V. Converse 
Stowe V. Bishop 
Stebbins v. Duncan 
Steed V. Knowles 
Steele v. Lord 

V. Wood 

Steeples v. Newton 
Stein V. Bowman 
Steiner v. Jester 

V. Snow 

V. Stranum 

Steinhoff v. M'Rae 
Steinmetz i^. Versailles 

Co. 
Stephen v. State 
Stephens v. Bernays 
Stephenson v. Bannister 



18324 

4278 

219 

42716, 978», 97845 

18380, 257*6, 257*9 

2769 

97812 

39161, 58812 

2578* 

5541* 

35818 

35818, 35823 

3582' 

5541 

2-574' 

622'^ 

12294' 

1179*1 

12299 

80810 

Turnpike 

2121 
2126 

117920, 117925 
117925 



ccl 



Stertz V. Stewart 
Stettaner v. White 
Stevens v. Bomar 

u. McNamara 

V. Miles 

V. R. R. 

w. State 

V. Stevens 

V. Taft 

Stevenson v. Hoy 

V. State 

Stewart v. Everts 

V. Scott 

V, Sonneborn 

V. Swanzy 



AMERICAN TABLE OE CASES. 
References are to pages. 



25726 

46332 

117932 

18333, 18336 

35811 
39160 



Stier V. Oskaloosa 
Stiles V. Eastman 

V. Estabrook 

Stinchfield v. Emerson 
Stinde v. Goodrich 
• V. Ridgway 



21 

183« 

35816 

3588, 36522 

39135 

35813 

526 

117910, II7916, 117920, 

117921, 117928 

2111 

635* 

97834 

18337 

183«2 

188*2, 183*3 



Stockbridge v. West Stockbridge 
Stokes V. U. S. 
Story V. Kimball 

V. Lovett 

Stratton v. Hawks 
Strauss v. Bodeker 

V. Gross 

Street v. State 
Strickler v. Burkholder 
Stringfellow v. State 
Strode v. Churchill 
Strong V. Bradley 

V. Brewer 

Strother v. Christy 

V. Lucas 

Stroud V. Tilton 
Stuart V. Havens 
Stubbs V. State 
Studley v. Hall 
Studstill V. State 



1179" 
122953 
117938 
122912 
358" 



80828 

257', 25720 

2763 



11792', 117928 

117938 

122929 

117944 

122952, 122959 

4639, 463", 46319, 46322 

36510, 36511, 36513 

211S 

6222* 

2125 



StuU V. Thompson 
Stumm V. Hummel 3653 

Sturla V. Freccia _ 11798 

Succession of Delachaise v. Magin- 



nis 




276* 


Succession of Justus 




117913 


Succession of Morvant 


12292', 


122935 


Sullivan v. Collins 




8085 


V, Cora. 




4709 


V. Hense 




216 


V. Kuykendall 




18351 


V. Lear 




8082* 


V. State 




470* 


V. Sullivan 




91021 


Sumner v. Blair 


9783* 


97885 


Sun Accident Ass. v. King 




91018 


Susquehanna, &c. Ins. Co. 


V. Mar- 




dorf 


3589 


35810 


Sutton V. Johnstone 




526 


Swain v. Cheney 


46312 


463=1 


V. Cnmstock 




2112 


Swan V. Humphreys 




622W 


• V. Morgan 




4528 



Swann v. Housman 9101' 

Sweet V. Sherman 2573', 97354 

Sweigart v. Ricliards 122969 

Swift V. Mass. &c. Co. 391" 

Swift Electric Light Co. <;. Grant 97852 
Swink V. French 427io 

Swinnerton u. Columbia Ins. Co. 213o, 2189 
Syme v. Stewart 529, 5212 



Tait v. Hall 
Talbot V. Seaman 
Talbott V. Hedge 
Tarns V. Bullitt 
Tarbox v. State 
Tate V. Penne 

V. Tate 

Taulman v. State 
Taylor, Re, 
Taylor v. Bank 

V. Crockett 

V. Evans 

V. Godfrey 

V. Gould 

V. Horsey 

V, Peck 

V. R. R. 

V, State 



3916 

521*, 11793 

12293*, 122936 

218* 

25710 

62226 

4526, 62215, 62216, 635* 

91018 

3911 

117912 

80820, 80821 

622' 

526 

452* 

39165 

5542 

3913', 55413 

5881, 58816, 58821, 

978", 97818 

62215 



Tays V. Carr 
Teachout v. People 
Teall V. Van Wyck 122916 

Tedens ?;. Schumers 2573' 

Teese v. Huntingdon 257*6, 25753 

Teipel v. Hilsendegen 52* 

Temple v. State 470* 

Temple St. Cable R. R. v. Hell- 
man 27613 
Templeton v. Morgan 21" 
Tennant v. Dudley 5548, 5549 
Tenney v. Tuttle 2572' 
Tennis v. Rapid Transit Ry. Co. 39128 
Tensley v. Penniman 35812 
Terra Haute R. R. r. Stockwell 35816 

V. Voelker 52* 

Terrill v. Beecher 4632, 4635 

Territory v. Ely 12299 

Terry v. Birmingham Nat. Bk. 46330 

Tessmant). Supreme Commandery 11792' 
Tessmann v. United Friends 117918 

Tewksbury v. Schulenberg 213* 

Texas, &c. Coal Co. v. Lawson 46311, 97889 
Texas, &c. R. R. v. Barron 3913* 



V. Black 


2185 


V. Chapman 


52* 


V. Robertson 


S9116 


Thayer v. Boyle 


25728, 257*' 


Theilmann v. Burg 


2118 


Tliird Nat. Bank v. Owen 


978' 


Thom V. Hess 


55412, 55418 


Thomas v. Cora. 


2113, 2188 


V. Dunn 


1229* 


V. Hammond 


808' 


V. Herrall 


39136 


V. Gage 


554* 



AMEKICAN TABLE 0:F CASES. 



cell 



Beferences are to pages. 



Thomas v. Griffin 

II. Kennedy 

V. People 

V. State 

V. Thomas 

Thompson v. Bell 

!). Boston 

I'. Erie Railway Co. 



6228 

80821 

183', 25735, 257" 

1229^7 

1838' 

80821 

2573 

12292 



V. German Valley B. Co, 

V. Haskell 

V. Ish 

V. Maxwell 

V. Musser 

V. State 

V. Stewart 

('. Wertz 

Thomson v. Porter 
Thomson-Houston 
Palmer 



62218 

2118 

.39139 

80810 

117912, 117913 

97812, 97843 

216, 11792^ 117915 

978« 

463', 4638, 46313 

Electric Co. e;. 

35820 



5542 

1179« 

80825 

122921, 122924 

91011, 91012 

358" 

391*2 



Thornton v. Thornton 97827, 978^5 
Thorp V. Goewey 622" 
Thraslier v. Everhart 52", 5215 
V. Ingram 117919, 117920, 11792', 

117926, 11792' 
Threadgill v. White 
Thurman v. Cameron 
Thurmond v. Clark 
Thurston 0. Masterson 

V. Whitney 

Tibbals v. Iffland 

Tilk V. Parsons 

Tillie, The 

Tillotson V. Warner 117935, 117986 

V. Webber 1179^ 

Tingley v. Fairharen Land Co. 391™ 

Tinker v. State 21S9 

Tisdale v. Conn. &o. Ins. Co. 18335 

Titus V. Ash 257« 25763, 978« 

Tobacco Co. v. McElwee 5546 

Tobias v. Treist 978*2 

Tobin V. Shaw 18326, 391« 

Todd V. Rowley 257« 

Toledo, &c. R. R. v. Bailey 978*2 

Tolman v. Emerson 183", 18318, 122922 

V. Ward 8082* 

Tolson V. Inland, &c. Coasting Co. 276io 
Tome V. Parkersburg Brancli R. R. 

122963, 122966 
Tomlinson v. Greenfield 2129 

Toms V. Beebe 6228 

Tooker v. Gormer 5542 

Toole V. Nichol 9783* 

Toomer v. Gadsden 46313 

Toplitz V. Hedden 978** 

Torbert v. Wilson 1179« 

Totten V. XJ. S. 622^0 

Towle V. Blake 39136 

Town of So. Ottawa v. Perkins 21io 

Townsend v. State 521 

Traction Co. v. Board of Works 11791, 
117936, 1179", 1179*2, 1179*6 
Trammell v. Hndmon 4526 

V. McDade 97826 

V. Pilgrim 8082 

Travellers Ins. Co.u. Sheppard 391", 39116 



Travis v. Brown 122959 

Trenier v. Stewart 213* 

Trimble v. Edwards 213i, 358" 

Trout V. Virginia R. B. 628 

TrujiUo V. Terr. 97820, 978^2 

Tucker v. Constable 39161 

V. Donald 39182 

V. Finch 6226 

V. Hyatt 122962 

V. Peaslee 218*, 3913 

V. Smith 4125, 4129 

V. State 2124 

V. Welsh 978*9 

Tudor Iron Works v. Weber 3656 

Tufts V. Charlestown 5546 

Tuley V. Barton 8O8IO, 808", 8O8I' 

TuUy V. Fitchburg R. R. 36518, 36522 

Tunstall v. Cobb 1229**, 122961 

Turnbull v. Payson 218, 117919, 117937 



V. Richardson 

Turner v. Dewan 

V. Fish 

V. Luning 

V. State 

V. Turner 

V. Waddington 

V. Warren 

Turner's Estate 
Turney v. State 
Turnipseed v. Hawkins 
Turnpike Co. v. Hearn 
Tuttle V. Fitchburg R. R. 

V. Gridley 

V. Kainey 

Tutton V. Darke 
Tylden v. BuUen 
Tyler v. Flanders 

V. Old Colony R. B. 

V. Todd 

Tyson v. Booth 



117939 

2182 

4523 

216 

257" 

36519, 4706 

80821 

1179" 

6226 

6226 

97826 

1229*0 

257*1 

2572 

910", 91012 

122938 

2128 

I22918 
427* 

39126 

1229*' 
25716 



Udderzook v. Com. 2135, 35520 

Udy V. Stewart 52', 3656 

Ufford V. Spaulding 5215 

Uhlman v. Arnholdt, &c. Brewing Co. 18361 



UUman v. Babcock 


12296' 


Union v. Plainfield 


4273, 427* 


Union Bank v. Knapp 46319, 46320 


Union Pac. R. R. v. 


Botsford 365', 3659, 




36510, 365" 


V. Reese 


978*5 


Union Stove Wks. v 


. Arnoux 8082 


Unis V. Charlton 


97747 


U. S. u. Amedy 


213, 117930 


V. 4000 American Gold Coin 2130 


V. Anthony 


183* 


V. Babcock 


183*9, 18353 


V. Battiste 


521 


V. Beebe 


21', 2120, 11796 


V. Bredemeyer 


26786, 257*' 


V. Eritton 


85818 


V, Burns 


2127 


V. Charles 


62221 


V. Collins 


3655 



cclii 



U.S. 



AMEKICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
Eeferences are to pages. 



V. Ducourneau 


2188 


V. Fuller 


218, 2121 


II. Gooding 


18322 


V. Gunnell 


25781) 


V. Hanway 


6351 


V. Harries 


635' 


V. Hay ward 


276* 


V. Heath 


4704 


V. Jackalow 


2134 


V. Jackson 


2122 



V. Johns 212 117911, nygso 

V. Jourdine 391^1 

V. Kirkwood 6881 

V. La Vengeance 21^4 

V. Mayfield 6889 

V. Moses 62225 

V. Nardello 39143 

V. Nott 58816, 58821 

V. Palmer 2]4 

V. Eeyburn 3582 

II. Keynes 21' 

V. Richard 58823 

V. Ritchie 219 

«. Ross 18321, 1834' 

V. Schneider 470" 

V. Teschmaker 2139 

V. Turner 21i6 

V. Union Pac. R. R. 2131 

V. Van Leuven 6358 

V. Vansickle 25746, 2574', 25749 

. II. Wiggins 18321, 11792 

• I). Williams 5881" 

V. Wood 6351, 6352 

U. S. Bank v. Burson 46313 
U. S. Sugar Refinery v. E. P. AUis 

Co. 3583 
U. S. Vinegar Co. v. Foehrenbach 117912 



Vahle v. Braekenseik 21i9, 2124 

Valentine v. Piper 18348, 122910 

Van Alstyne v. Smith 6228, 8O821 

Van Bokkelen v. Taylor 808', 8082' 

Van Buskirk v. Mulock 1179", 117912 

Vance v. Vance 2573' 

Vanderlin v Hovis 808^ 
Vandervoort v. Columbian Ins. Co. 117918 

Vanderwerker 11. People 2120 

Van Deusen v. Turner 412' 
Van Gunden v. Va. Coal & Iron Co. 358" 

Van Kirk v. Scott 808' 

Van Riper v. Morton 11791 

Van Sickle v. Gibson 4278 

V. People 122968 

Van Storch v. Griffin 25738 

Van Svckel v. Dalrymple 8O8I8 

Van Wyck v. Mcintosh 122943, 12296', 
122988, 122963 

Vass's Case 4706, 47016 

Vastine v. Wilding 18324 

Vaughan v. Com. 47012, 588" 

V. State 6356 

Velten v. Carmack 80823 

Viall V. Smith 4278, 427ii 
Vickers v. Battershall 



Vicknair v. Trosclair 8O820, 91020 

Vicksburg R. R. </. O'Brien 39118, ggjig^ 

39124, 9782 

V. Putnam 39133 

Vignie v. Brady 80826 

Vigus V. O'Bannon 2764 

Village of Ponca !,-. Crawford 39129 

Village of Winooski v. Gokey 2I12 

Vinal V. Oilman 43680 

Vincent v. State 9108, giQe^ 91022 

Vining v. Baker 18324 

Vinton V. Peck 3653, 122952, 122954, 122901 
Violet V. Rose 12293' 

Volkenand v. Drum 
Voorhies v. Hennessy 
Vosburgh v. Thayer 4636, 4638 

Vose V. Manly 117934 

Vriets v. Hagge 27619 



Waddelb v. N. Y. &e. R. R. S9123 

Waddingham v. Hulett 25744, 25745 

Waddington v. Cousins 122968 

Waddle v. Owen 8084 

Wade V. State 9105, giQo 

Wakefield v. Ross 910", 91012 

Walbridge v. Jones 427' 

Waldele v. N. Y. Cen. &c. E. 4703 

Walden v. Canfield 213i 

V. Finch 97862 

Walker v. Allen 2135 

D. Curtis 528 

;;. Detroit, &c. R. R. 276", 97882 



V. Greenlee 


3581 


V. Marseilles 


4526 


V. Murray 


4271 


V. Sanborn 


6222 


V. State 4702, 588i, 9104, giQW, 




91023 


V. Steele 


122943 


V. Stetson 


525 


V. Wheatly 


80828 


Wall V. Dovey 


463", 46321 


Wallace v. Fletcher 


1834', 18348 


V. Harris 


18326 


V. Howard 


4278 


V. Kennelly 


2184 


V. State 


47016 


V. Townsend 


3588 


V. White 


25763 


Waller v. Eleventh School District 3581" 


V. Graves 


25 


Walston V. Com. 


470", 47018 


Walter v. Hoeffner 


97888 


Walton V. Coulson 183", 


122910, 122919, 




122921, 122923 


Ward, Estate of 


463-!8 


Ward V. Henry 


2119 


V. Mcintosh 


183-24 


V. Saunders 


117989, 117940 


V. State 


58814 


V. Young 


9782' 


Ware v. Ware 


2768, 27614 


Warener v. Kingsmill 


1179", 117949 


Waring v. U. S. Telg. Co. 


5544 



Warlick v. White 




3658, 36521 


Warner v. Com. 




117930 


V. State 




9105 


Warren v. Chapman 




97829 


V. Gabriel 




97825, 97829 


Washabaugh v. Entriken 


117920 


Washington v. State 




97815, 978« 


Waterman v. Whitney 




391W, 391" 


Watkins v. Holman 




1179* 


V. Paine 




3588 


Watrous v. McGrew 




117931 


Watson V. Brewster 


3918», 


4278, 122933 


V. Com. 




6354, 635' 


V. Miller 


SOSi", 978^ 978" 


V. Tindal 




18333 



AMEEICAN TABLE OP CASES. 
References are to pages. 

Whitaker v. Salisbury 



ccliii 



V. Walker 212, 11792^ 11798^ 117911 

Watts V. Kilburn 12298, 122910 

V. Owens 427^ 

Wau-kon-chaw-neek-kaw v. XJ. S. 978*^ 

Way V. Butterworth 622^3 

1.-. Cross 463" 

Weathersly v. Weathersly 808" 

Weaver v. Gainsville 8O8I0 

V. McElhenor 21^5 

V. Whildeu 1229=0 

Webb V. State 978", 978^ 

Webber v. Dunn 554^ 

Weber v. Cable Ey. Co. 523 



. lUing 
Webster v. Calden 

V. Woodford 

Wedgwood's Case 
Weeks v. Medler 
Weitman v. Thiot 
Welch V. Abbot 
Welder v. MoComb 
Welland Canal Co. v. 



8085 
1179« 



Wells V. Hatch 

V. Jackson Iron Mfg. Co. 

Wells, &c. Ex. V. Fuller 
Welsh V. Barrett 

V. State 

Wendell v. Abbott 

Wendt V. St. Paul 

Wentworth v. Wentworth 

Wesson v. Washburn Iron Co. 391*, 391= 

West V. Fleck 808" 

V. State 18322, 18339, 4527^ 4795^ 122927, 

122959 



117949 

80816 

122921 

978«, 978*0 

117921 

Hathaway 358", 

654M 

46312 

2118, 2133 

898" 
46332 
2763 
4125, 117946 
97836, 97830 
18338 



Western XJ. Tel. Co. 0. Cline 

V. Collins 

V. Henderson 

- — V. Shotter 

V. Stevenson 

Wetherbee v. Dunn 

V. Norrls 

Wetzler v. Kelly 

Wharton v. Douglass 

Wheat V. State 

Wheeldon v. Wilson 

Wheeler v. Webster 

Wheelock v. Boston & Albany E. Co. 523 

Whelan v. Lynch 39152 

Whitaker v. Parker 1229*o 



3581', 85821 
35810 

39134 

35810 
358* 

2119 

257S1 

2129 

80821 

2765 

21 

21*0 



97821, 122913, 
1229" 122915 
46327 
391*9 
520 
9105, 9106 
1179*9 

18353 



V. White 

Whitcher v. Shattuck 
White V. Ballou 

V. Com. 

V. Dwinel 

V. Fleming 

V. Milwaukee City B. E. 865", 365ia 

V. Phoenix Ins. Co. 2137 

V. Solomon 12295 

V. State 58813, 97327^ 97329 

V. Strother 42712 

V. Whitney 468*, 46313, 46321 

V. Wood 12291* 

White Sewing Machine Co. v. Gor- 
don 1229*3 
Whitehead v. Jessup 8083 

V. Park 8080 

Whitehouse v. Bickford 117933, 117912 
Whiting V. NichoU 1833*, 13336^ 13336 

Whitley v. Eq. Life, &e. Co. 18830 

V. State 47017 

Whitman v. Morey 97827 

V. Shaw 122924 

V. State 2113, 2180 

Whitmore v. Dwelling House Ins. 

Co. 183*9 

Whitney v. Bacon 4127 

V. Bayley 3580 

V. Clark 8O8IO 

V. Gauche 213* 

V. Thacher 

V. Wall 

Whiton V. Albany, &c. Ins. Co. 2132, 2139 
1179', 11797 
Whittier v. Franklin 257*2 

Whitton V. State 183* 

Wickencamp v. Wickencamp 978=4 

Wickersham v. Johnston 52i2, II791*, 
117929, 117982 
Wiggin V. Plumer 122928 

Wiggins Ferry Co. v. C. & A. E. Co. 215 
Wiggles worth v. Steers 
Wike I'. Lightner 



Wilber v. Eicholtz 
Wilbur V. Flood 
Wilburn ;;, State 
Wilcox V. Henderson 

V. Cate . 

Wilder v. Cowles 
Wildrick v. Swain 
Wiley V. Athol 

V. Ewalt 

Wilhelmi v. Leonard 
Wilkerson v. State 
Will of Ehle 
Willett V. Eich 
Williams v. Brickell 

V. Cora. 

V. Conger 

V. Deen 

V. Finlay 

V. Fisher 

V. Grealy 



25750 

122902 

97839, 97841 

358" 

27612 

80810 

2768 

80810 

8915 

80820, 80821 

9783* 

470*, 6224 

183*3 

2763 

35810, 35817 

3911 

122963 

122927 

529, 5216 

8081 

62* 



ccliv 



AMEEICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
Beferences are to pages. 



Williams v. Grey 358i», 358ii 

V. Gunter 4638 

V. Jenkins 8082» 

V. Mitchell 18316, 1834s 

V. MovTer 554i 

V. People 2765 

V. State 2180, 2IS1, 25736, 588^ 58812, 

58816, 58827, 58823^ 91020, 97825, 12294b, 
122981 

V. Wager 978i 

V. Walker 978« 

V. Waters 358i*, 808^ 

V. Wilkes 11792", 117939 

V. Williams 117926 

Williamson v. Brandenberg 21 29 

V. Cambridge R. K. 39126 

Willink V. Miles 1179« 

Willis V. State 58826, 58828 

Willoughby v. Carleton 122912 

V. Dewey 218* 

Wills V. State 4709, 978*8 

Wilmer v. Israel 4636 

Wilmington v. Burlington 427'' 

Wilson V. Beauchamp 365' 

V. Boerera 470^ 

V. Carpenter's Adm'r 2571^ 

V. Deen 8O8I8 

V. Derr 808i», 8O8I1 

D. Goodin 46312 

V. Granby 89136 

V. Higbee 8O821 

V. McClenny 80828 

V. Melvin 2766 

V. Minneapolis, &o. R. R. 35816, 358" 

V. Phoenix, &c. Co. 117922 

V. Powers 80826 

1;. State 257*8, 257*9, 978", 97815, 

9782* 



2128, 2129^ 526, 122927 

97836 

463*, 4635, 463', 4638 

35819 

55413 

5216 

122950, 122950, 122951 

18328, 3586 

I22916 

4272 

8589, 35810 



V. Van Leer 

V. Wager 

V. Wilson 

V. Wright 

Wilt V. Bird 

V. Cutler 

Wimbish v. State 
Wimer v. Smith 
Winch V. Norman 
Winder v. Little 
Wing V. Abbott 

Winnipiseogee Lake Co. 0. Young 21 1^, 

2120, 2138 



Winship v. Connor 
Winslow V. Covert 

V. Driskell 

Winston v. Browing 
Winters v. Earl 
Wisdom V. Reeves 
Wise V. Wynn 
Wiseman v. N. Pao. R. R. 
Witclier v. McLaughlin 
Witliee V. Rowe 
Woburn v. Henshaw 
Wolf V. Lachman 

V. Perryman 

Wolfe V. Dyer 



1838* 

978*8 

808-'5 

8082 

80819 

554*, 122928 

4272, 4278, 427' 

35810, 35820 

4278, 46326 

3652, 36-58 

62216 

358" 

25786 

8086 



Wolfe V. McMillan 
Wollf u. Van Housen 
Womack v. Dearman 

V. Wamble 

Wonderly v. Holmes Lumber Co 
Wood V. Chetwood 

V. Cullen 

V. McGuire's Children 

V. Moriarty 

V. V. S 



97889 

218, 117937, 117989 



6222 

30829 
97854 
80828 
25719 



Woodbeck v. Keller 635i, 6358 

Woodbridge, &c. Co. v. Ritter 117927 

Woodbury v. District of Columbia 97888, 

9788* 

V. Woodbury 4638 

Woodbury Granite Co. v. Milliken 522 
Woodford v. McClenahan 122927, 122928 
Woodman v. Segar 1229^0, 122919 

Woodrick v. Woodrick 978** 

Woods V. Banks 117982 

V. People 25786 

V. Wilder 2180 

Woodward v. Chicago, &c. R. R. 2120 

V. Hancock 52' 

V. Leavitt 6222* 

Woodworth v. Mills 257'* 

Woolfork V. State 257", 58812 

Woolsy V. Trustees 97856, 1179*9 

Woolverton v. Sumner 91018 

Wooster v. State 39151 

Wooten V. Wilkins 4708 

Worcester Nat. Bank v. Cheney 2120 

V. Northborough 11791 

Workingmen's Bank v. Converse 21" 
Worley, Adm. v. Hineman 183** 

Wormsdorf v. Detroit, &c. Ry. 257*2 

Worthington v. Scribner 
Wray v. Wray 
Wrege v. Westcott 
Wright V. Gay 

V. Hawkins 

V. Hersey 

V. 111. &c. Tel. Co. 

V. McKee 



62219, 62225 

18381 

5547, 55411 

80819 

218, 2112 

122958 

62225 

257-^8 

V. Phillips 2122 

V. Skinner 183=8 

V. State 588* 

V. Wright 218*, 2768 

Wroe V. State 25782, 47013^ 47015, 97839, 

978*1 
Wynn v. City, &c. R. R. 35823 

Wynne v. State 86519 

Yates v. State 58821, 5882* 

V. Yates 1229** 

Yearsley's Appeal 4631^ 

Yeaton v. Fry 215, 216 

Yell V. Lane 21=3 

Yerkes v. National Bank 21^ 

York V. Pease 97856 

York, &c. R. Co. u. Winans 21' 

Youn V. Lamont 2762 

Young V. Bank of Alexandria 117912 

V. Bradv 978*5 

V. Chandler 1179=' 



AMERICAN TABLE OF CASES. 
Keferences are to pages. 



cclv 



YouDg V. Clapp 


183« 


Youngs V. HefEner 


1838*, 183" 




68818 


Yount !;. Howell 


212, 216 




25733, 2673^ 






V. Makepeace 


3655 


Zelch v. Hirt 


8082S 




97826 


Zellerbach v. AUenberg 


35819 


Younge v. Guilbeau 


X179« 


Zoldowski V. State 


97813 



A 

PRACTICAL TREATISE 

ON THE 

LAW OF EYIDENCE. 



PART I. 

NATUEE AND PEINCIPLES OF EVIDENCE. 



CHAPTER I. 

PEEHMINAKY OBSERVATIONS. 

§ 1.^ Evidence, in Law, includes all the legal means, exclusive 
of mere argument, which tend to prove or disprove any fact the 
truth of which is submitted to judicial investigation. It and the 
word proof are often used as synonyms. Accurate logicians, 
however, apply the latter term rather to the effect of evidence, than 
to evidence itself.^ That high degree of evidence which is called 
demonstration excludes all possibility of error, and mathematical 
truth alone is susceptible of it. Such evidence cannot be obtained 
in the investigation of matters of fact, of which the most that can 
ever be said is, that there is no reasonable doubt concerning them.' 
In trials of fact, therefore, the true question is not, whether it is 
possible that the testimony may be false, but whether there is 
sufficient probability of its truth ; that is, whether the facts are 
proved by competent and satisfactory evidence. 

§ 2.* By competent (or admissible) evidence is meant that which 
the law requires, as the fit and appropriate proof in the particular 
case — such, for instance, as the production of a writing, where its 
contents are the subject of inquiry. By satisfactory evidence, 
sometimes called sufficient evidence, is intended that amount of 
proof which ordinarily satisfies an unprejudiced mind beyond 

1 Gr. Ev. § 1, in great part. remarks, that, thougli capable of de- 

* See Wills, Cir. Ev. 2 ; Whately's monstration, they are admitted by 

Log. B. ii. o. iii. § 1 ; N. York Civ. most men solely on the moral evidence 

Code, § 1660. of general notoriety. Id. 196. See 

3 See Gamb. Guide, 121. Even of N. York Civ. Code, § 1662. 

mathematical truths this writer justly * Gr. Ev. § 2, almost verbatim. 

T. VOL. I. 1 B 



PRELIMINARY OBSEEVATIONS. [PAET I. 

reasonable doubt. The circumstances wMch will amount to this 
degree of proof can never be previously defined ; the only legal 
test of which they are susceptible is their sufficiency to satisfy the 
mind and conscience of an ordinary man ; and so to convince him 
that he would venture to act upon that conviction in matters of 
important personal interest.^ Questions respecting the competency 
or admissibility of evidence are entirely distinct from those which 
respect its sufficiency or .effect. The former are exclusively within 
the province of the court ; the latter belong exclusively to the jury.^ 

§ 3.' The law of Evidence may be considered under three 
general heads, namely, First, The Nature and Principles of 
Evidence ; — Secondly, The Object of Evidence, and the Rules 
which govern its production ; — And, Thirdly, The Means of Proof, 
or the Instruments by which facts are established. We will also, 
in connection with the first head, consider what matters the courts 
will notice without proof ; and in connection with the second and 
third heads, offer a few observations respecting the functions of 
the judge, as distinguished from those of the jury. 

§ 3a. The present is a convenient place to mention that, by the 
Short Titles Act, 1892 (iS Yict. o. 10), short titles are given by 
statute to various Acts of Parliament (no less than 810), and that 
in the following pages this short title is stated between inverted 
commas ; while the technical reference to the Act is also added, one 
or the other of these references being placed in brackets. Moreover, 
where a statement in the text is founded on a decision of the House 
of Lords, it is marked " H. L.," while if founded on one of the 
Courts of Appeal or Privy Council, it is marked " C. A." or " P. C," 
American cases being distinguished by the mark " (Am.)," Irisb 
cases by " (Ir.)," and Scotch authorities as " (So.)." On the other 
hand, if it is founded on a dictum of a particular judge, his name 
is generally given in brackets after that of the case in which it was 
uttered (whether at Nisi Prius or in the course of a judgment 
given in banc). The date of every case w^hich is important in 
estimating its value is given, and every known reference to it will 
be found in the Table of Cases. 

> 1 St. Ev. 578. Hayward, 1780 (BuUer, J.). 

' 1 Ph. Ev. *3 ; Carpenters' Co. v. » Gr. Ev. § 3, in great part 



* N.B. — This and similar references throughout the work are to "Phillipps 
and Arnould on Evidence." o 



USAP. I.] AMERICAN NOTES. -^ 



AMERICAN NOTES. 

§ 1. Evidence Defined. — Evidence is that which shows. Legally, 
it is any fact which, either directly or mediately, tends to show to 
the mind the truth of a fact or proposition submitted to legal inves- 
tigation. Miles V. Edden, 1 Duv. (Ky.) 270 (1864) ; Schloss v. His 
Creditors, 31 Cal. 201 (1866). 

This definition includes both direct and circumstantial evidence, 
though as was said in an Iowa case (Davenport v. Cummings, 15 la. 
219, (1863), "direct and positive evidence cannot with a critical 
regard to accuracy be spoken of as tending to prove an issue." If 
believed, it proves it. 

"Fact." — The definition of "evidence" is obviously incomplete 
until the term "fact" used in defining it is itself defined. But 
"fact" is a term exceedingly difficult of definition. So difficult, 
that Sir James Eitz-James Stephen frankly abandoned it. In the 
first edition of the "Digest of the Law of Evidence" "fact" is 
defined as, " (1) Everything capable of being perceived by the 
senses ; (2) Every mental condition of which any person is con- 
scious ; (3) Every part of a fact is itself a fact." As pointed out by 
a careful critic in the " Solicitors' Journal " (20 Sol. Journal, 869, 
(1876), this definition on application breaks down, — e. g. when 
attempted to be incorporated into the rule that evidence can only be 
given of facts in issue or facts relevant thereto. The "fact in 
issue " may be, for example, the existence of negligence, something 
clearly not " capable of being perceived by the senses," nor yet a 
" mental state of which a person is conscious." The force of this 
criticism was promptly recognised by Mr. Stephen, who contijnts 
himself in later editions with the statement that " fact includes the 
fact that any mental state of which any person is conscious exists." 

This is apparently correct. What A.'s motive was in taking a 
mortgage or other transfer is a question of fact for the jury. 
Wheelden v. Wilson, 44 Me. 1 (1857) ; Hamburg v. Wood & Co., 
66 Tex. 168 (1886). For the same reason, "where the intent 
with which an act was done becomes material, it is proper to ask 
what it was." Over v. SchifiSing, 102 Ind. 191 (1885) ; Barnhart v. 
Fulkerth, 93 Cal. 497 (1892) ; Stevens v. Stevens, 150 Mass. 557 
(3889). So purpose is a question of fact. Homans v. Corning, 
60 N. H. 418 (1880). The same cases hold that the person whose 
mental state is in question may properly testify as to it. But what 
a witness supposed A. thought as a motive for what A. did, is not a 
competent inquiry. McHugh v. Dowd, 88 Mich. 412 (1891) ; Clement 
V. Cureton, 36 Ala. 120 (1860). For a similar reason, a witness 
cannot be asked what A. " understood " by a designated parcel of 
real estate. "It must be difficult, to a degree bordering on the 



22 AMERICAN NOTES. [PAET I. 

impossible, for one person to testify, of his own knowledge, what 
the understanding of another was, to any given question. Such 
testimony is not to a fact; it must be merely an opinion, a con- 
jecture as to a fact. Clearly this is as far as possible from legal 
testimony." Gorham v. Gorham, 41 Conn. 242 (1874). 

Without attempting to define " fact " it may be suggested that 
tiie fundamental idea of "fact" is that which exists. As a thing 
cannot both be and at the same time not be, that which exists 
is the truth or fact of the matter. About this central thought of 
real or true existence, seem to cluster various uses, all associating 
with the word " fact " the ideas of truth, verity, accomplishment, 
actually happening, &c. Thus the Latin factum implies some- 
thing done, an act or deed, something accomplished or done. The 
same word, factum, represents the instrument of conveyance which 
actually accomplished the transfer of land, — a " deed " as now 
called. Probably the phrase " free act a.nd deed," like many 
other similar formulaB, is tautological, the words having nearly the 
same meaning. So an oflS.cer de facto is one in actual existence 
and discharging certain functions, whatever the rights of the de jure 
claimant may be. The colloquial use of the word " fact " will be 
most often found to embody the same conception of actual, real 
existence. 

This conception of fact is by no means limited to tangible objects 
or those perceived by the senses. The phrase goes further, for the 
purpose of including mental processes. A thought, intention, emo- 
tion ; any mental state or feeling ; the truth of propositions phrased 
by the intellect, are matters of " fact." Whatever has existence is 
a fact. A question of fact is an inquiry into the truth or existence 
of something. It is of course only such as are in issue that are the 
subject of evidence. 

It may be objected that under this definition the existence of a 
rule of law is a question of fact. Strictly speaking, such is the 
case. Where no special cotisiderations are involved, — for example, 
in regard to the law of foreign countries or, in most instances, the 
law of other States of the Union, — this is recognised to be true. 
The existence of a rule of law of a foreign state or country is purely 
a question of fact, and appropriate evidence is introduced to prove 
it as a fact. 

For especial reasons, the existence of the rules of law or standards 
of conduct which any domestic tribunal is established to enforce in 
its own jurisdiction, are not legally treated as other matters of fact, 
to be established by evidence, but are within the duty, knowledge, 
and perception of the judge, without need of the intervention of evi- 
dence. These matters of fact are separated from others and called 
matters of law, judicially noticed by the Court. See post p. 21^ 

Not only are such rules of law as are judicially noticed by the 



CHAP. I.j AMERICAN NOTES. 



23 



Court excluded from the definition of fact, but also that part of the 
method of procedure which consists of, reasoning from the facts 
established by evidence to the ultimate facts in issue. This is the 
faculty of judgment, the formation of an opinion. It is the same 
faculty as is exercised by the expert witness, and is, under these 
circumstances, called "Matter of opinion." Excluding from the 
entire list of facts as above illustrated those which are " Matter of 
law " and " Matter of opinion," we have a residuum which for want 
of a better name, or more precise definition, we call "Matter of 
fact." 

A Double Meaning. — The phrase "evidence," even as used 
by the Courts, frequently presents a double meaning and more 
or less consequent confusion. The phrase is used to designate 
(1) The effect of relevant facts upon the facts in issue, — e. g., the 
fact that A. has always paid for food ordered in his name by B. is 
said to be " evidence " of B.'s agency, if such agency be a fact in 
issue ; (2) The statements of witnesses (or other means) by which 
these relevant facts are, in the first place, themselves sought to be 
established, — e. g., in the above instance, statements of witnesses 
that they have been paid by A. under the circumstances mentioned, 
are also said to be " evidence " of such payment. Strictly speaking, 
the correct use of the phrase is the second. The probative effect 
of relevant facts is a matter of logical reasoning. 

"Evidence" and "Pboof." — "Evidence" and "proof" are so 
frequently confused as to emphasise the necessity of avoiding collo- 
quial equivalents for technical words. The confusion is so common 
that a request for a ruling that a confessedly competent fact tending 
to show negligence in an action where negligence is in issue, " is 
not in itself ^TOrt/ of negligence " was held properly refused (Perry 
V. Dubuque S. W. R. Co. 36 Ta. 102 (1872), as a ruling calculated 
to mislead the jury. The Court say the instruction requested laid 
down " a correct legal principle. . . . In a legal sense _p)'oo/ signifies 
the effect of evidence as contradistinguished from evidence which 
implies the medium or means of proof. But in ordinary language 
the terms are used interchangeably." 

So where a statute required " proof " of the publication of a 
notice and the Court allowed such publication to be proved by 
affidavit, the ruling was sustained on the ground that there is " an 
obvious difference between the words evidence and proof. The 
former, in legal acceptation, includes the means by which any 
alleged matter of fact, the truth of which is submitted to investiga- 
tion, is established or disproved. The latter is the effect or result 
of evidence. These words are often used indiiferently as expres- 
sive of the same thing." 

" Testimony." — A similar confusion follows the frequent use of 
the word "testimony" as synonymous with "evidence." They 



2* AMEEICAil NOTES. [PAKT I. 

are not synonymous. The distinction between them is well stated 
in Lindley v. Dakin, 13 Ind. 388 (1859). In the upper court the 
record recited that it embodied "all the testimony taken in the 
Court below." Held : that this could not be so construed as to 
amount to a statement of setting out the evidence. "Testimony is 
not synonymous with evidence. It is but a species or class or 
kind of evidence. Testimony is' the evidence given by witnesses. 
Evidence is wliatever may be given to the jury as tending to prove 
a case. It includes the testimony of witnesses, documents, admis- 
sions of parties, &c." This is cited with approval in Harvey v. 
Smith, 17 Ind. 272 (1861). 

"Cumulative Evidence." — Some difference of opinion exists 
as to what evidence is to be considered cumulative. It is not 
disputed that cumulative evidence is correctly defined in Parker v. 
Hardy, 24 Pick. 246 (1837) as " additional evidence of the same 
kind to the same point." But the cases, while agreeing as to the 
rule, differ as to its proper application. Certain authorities hold 
that where a fact is in issue, any evidence tending to prove that 
fact is cumulative to any previous evidence tending to prove the 
same fact, even though the later evidence differs somewhat in its 
character from that which has preceded it. For example, the 
turning-point of the case being whether a certain bill of exchange 
had been left at a bank for collection before noon of a certain day, 
and evidence of time of the leaving being gone into by various 
witnesses, newly discovered evidence that a clerk, whose duty it 
was to register the receipt if received before noon, did not register 
the receipt until the following day, because not received until after 
noon, was held cumulative. People v. Superior Court of the City of 
New York, 10 Wend. 285 (1833). The Court intimate that evidence 
that the plaintiff had been in such other places at the time in ques- 
tion as to render the deposit impossible as and when he claimed it, 
would not be cumulative. So where the fact in issue is the 
existence of a partnership between the plaintiff and defendant, 
newly discovered evidence that certain foods were ordered sent in 
a way tending to show a partnership is said to be cumulative, 
because it " tends to support the fact or issue which was before 
attempted to be proved upon the trial." Olmstead v. Hill, 2 Ark. 
346 (1840). So evidence tending to discredit a witness by showing 
contradictory statements is cumulative to other evidence tending to 
discredit the same witness in another way. Glidden v. Duulap, 28 
Me. 379, 383 (1848). 

On the other hand, other American courts incline to the view that 
evidence tending to establish a fact in issue in a particular way is 
not cumulative to evidence tending to establish the same fact in a 
different way. 

For example, the question being whether A. had authorised B. 



CHAP. I.] AMEEICAN NOTES. 



25 



to sell a certain horse, and much evidence other than admissions 
of the plaintiff having been received, a new trial was granted for 
newly discovered evidence that the plaintiff had admitted the author- 
ity in dispute. The Court, by Morton, J., say, " This, therefore, is 
a new kind of evidence, and although it is additional to other evi- 
dence tending to prove the same position, yet it is not cumulative 
because it is of a different character tending to establish the same 
general result by proof of a new and distinct fact." Parker v. 
Hardy, 24 Pick. 246 (1837). The same result is reached in Waller 
V. Graves, 20 Conn. 305, 310 (1850), where, in an action of libel, 
and in support of the defence that the libellous language was 
inserted without the defendant's consent and without his knowl- 
edge, newly discovered evidence of an independent witness that he 
himself inserted the libellous matter, was held not cumulative to 
the defendant's denial that he used the libellous epithets in the 
article as written by him. Church, C. J., speaking for the Court, 
says : — " There are often various distinct and independent facts 
going to establish the same ground on the same issue. Evidence is 
cumulative which merely multiplies witnesses to any one or more 
of the facts before investigated, or only adds other circumstances 
of the same general character. But that evidence which brings to 
light some new and independent truth of a different character, 
although it tend to prove the same proposition or ground of claim 
before insisted on, is not cumulative within the true meaning of 
the rule on this subject." As an instance of their meaning, the 
Court take the case of an executor resisting a claim based on an 
alleged note of the deceased, and after an adverse verdict discover- 
ing a receipt in full, or learning of the plaintiff's deliberate admis- 
sion of payment. " There could be no question," they say, " in 
such a case, but a new trial should be granted, although the new 
facts go to prove the former ground of defence." 

It would seem that the weight of reasoning was in favour of the 
position taken by the Massachusetts and Connecticut cases. 

The extent to which cumulative evidence is admissible is discre- 
tionary with the Court. A party will not be permitted unduly to 
waste time by multiplying witnesses to the same fact. 

§ 2. Competent Evidence. — Competent Evidence is that which 
is admissible, as tending to prove the existence or non-existence of 
facts in issue. The definition points to a central fact in the law 
of evidence, viz.; — that it is based upon logic. In fact, the modern 
trial is an appeal to the test of reasoning, as the result of a long 
historical development from other tests of truth, more mechanical, 
sacramental and formal, used by ancestors more or less remote. The 
rules of correct reasoning are at every turn regarded as essential to 
the due administration of judicial functions. The Court is charged 
with the duty of enforcing this rule of correct logical reasoning. 



25 



AMERICAN NOTES. [PAET I. 



If its coadjutor in trials of fact, the jury, sees fit to depart froni 
such a line of reasoning, whether under the influence of passion, 
prejudice, or other improper motive, it is the dutj' of the Court to 
correct the fault, even to the extent of nullifying a verdict which 
appears to have been reached under such influence. The duty is 
not, it will be observed, to enforce the particular reasoning which 
commends itself to the Court. It is sufficient that a line of correct 
reasoning has been adopted by the jury, even if the Court itself 
would have adopted a different one. If the verdict is justified on 
logical principles, it usually will stand. If the verdict is not so 
justified, it is the duty of the Court, in discharge of its responsi- 
bility to enforce the use of correct reasoning (even, as has been 
said, if not the Court's view of the particular line of correct reason- 
ing it would adopt for itself), to set the verdict aside. 

It naturally follows that a Court charged with the responsibility 
of insisting on the observance of the rules of logical reasoning will 
permit the jury, which it holds within these rules, to consider only 
such facts as meet the same requirement, i. e., which have a logical 
tendency to establish the existence or non-existence of the fact or 
facts whose existence is in issue or in dispute. This rule is not 
only a restriction upon the admissibilitj'^ of facts in evidence, but it 
also states the test which makes them admissible. As has been 
said, it is the fundamental rule of evidence that all facts which 
logically prove or disprove the existence of facts in issue, are 
admissible. 

Consideration of the law of evidence so largely consists in exam- 
ining the established exclusions of properly logical evidence, and the 
instances in which these exclusions themselves do not apply, that 
this first and principal rule of the law of evidence — that evidence 
logically tending to establish the issue is admissible — is frequently 
lost sight of. Unless a special reason be shown for excluding facts 
with a logically probative tendency, such facts are admissible. 

Eelevancy. — This logical relation of one fact to another, is 
termed "relevancy." Of this the law furnishes no test. The test 
is furnished by the ordinary principles of logic or a conscious per- 
ception of the relation. A legal definition of relevancy was indeed 
courageously attempted by Sir James Fitz-James Stephen in the 
first edition of the " Digest of the Law of Evidence," based largely 
on the relation of causation. This definition was abandoned. The 
amended definition seems free from objection. Two facts are rele- 
vant to each other when so related " that, according to the common 
course of events, one, either taken by itself or in connection with 
other facts, proves or renders probable the past, present, or future 
existence or non-existence of the other." (Dig. Law of Evid. Art. 1.) 

The Kule Further Examined. — Such being the fundamental 
rule of evidence, that all evidence logically probative is admissible, 



CHAP. I.J AMERICAN NOTES. 



27 



the further law of evidence consists of excluding certain facts of 
the evidence otherwise admissible under this fundamental general 
rule. The law of evidence becomes, therefore, so to speak, a series 
of exclusions. These owe their existence principally to two lines 
of considerations, — • (1) The necessity for trying cases within 
reasonable limits of time ; (2) The presence of the jury. These two 
considerations may be examined briefly. 

(1) Legal Relevancy. — The search for abstract truth, scien- 
tific or otherwise, is not usually limited in time. No fact relevant 
at all is too remotely relevant to deserve consideration. No press- 
ing necessity usually exists that the precise fact should be ascer- 
tained this year or next year, or, indeed, within the next century. 
Under such conditions, logic is given its unimpeded course. All 
facts logically relevant demand and receive consideration. 

But the course of trials in Courts of law by no means admits of 
such extended search into the rainutise of proof. The tribunal sits 
for a limited time, and frequently is called on to dispose of many 
contested matters within that period. The proceedings are expen- 
sive, both to parties litigant, to those awaiting their turn (often 
with witnesses held from gainful occupations by a compulsory pro- 
cess), and to the government through the pay of jurors, Court officers, 
&c. There is a recognised necessity that matters should be as 
speedily disposed of as the interests of justice will admit. 

This consideration was neatly put by Rolfe, B., in Atty.-Gen. v. 
Hitchcock (1 Exch. 91, (1847). "The laws of evidence on this 
subject, as to what ought and what ought not to be received, must 
be considered as founded on a sort of comparative consideration of 
the time to be occupied in examinations of this nature, and the time 
which it is practicable to bestow upon them. If we lived for a 
thousand years, instead of about sixty or seventy, and every case 
were of sufiicient importance, it might be possible, and perhaps 
proper, to throw a light on matters in which every possible question 
might be suggested, for the purpose of seeing by such means 
whether the whole was unfounded, or what portion of it was not, 
and to raise every possible inquiry as to the truth of the statements 
made. But I do not see how that could be ; in fact, mankind find it 
to be impossible. Therefore some line must be drawn." 

(2) Feae of the Jury. — A very distinctive feature of the English 
law of procedure, of which the law of evidence is part, lies in the 
fact that a jury frequently takes a share in the trial of causes. It 
involves no disparagement to the benefits, real or assumed, of the 
jury's presence to say that obvious dangers to the administration 
of justice have always been recognised as arising from it. The 
average jury is composed of men selected by chance from the 
general community, brought together for a short time and for a 
limited object, with minds usually entirely untrained in the dif- 



2^ AMEKICAN NOTES. [PAUT I. 

ficult art of justly balancing the weight of conflicting statements. 
Jurymen, almost of necessity, are seldom given to reasoning with 
logical exactness, and are therefore apt to jump across logical 
chasms or breaks in a chain of proof ; especially at times when 
sympathy or prejudice is aroused, or the fascinating process of 
adjusting or, as it were, dovetailing together separate pieces of 
evidence is nearly completed, and only fails for lack of a little 
imagination. Above all, the jury at all times has been, as is 
natural with so casual a tribunal, but little impressed with any 
feeling of responsibility for maintaining the integrity of legal 
rules or the influence of precedent in the administration of justice. 
It has accordingly usually manifested a strong tendency to over- 
look the more important remote consequences of maintaining a 
general rule for the purpose of relieving the hardship of individual 
cases. 

Exclusions. — For these and similar reasons, the law of evidence 
excludes much evidence logically relevant, either (1) By applying a 
higher standard of relevancy than mere logic by requiring a certain 
high grade of probative effect, which may be called legal relevancy ; 
and (2) By absolutely excluding certain facts both logically and 
legally relevant. What facts are so highly probative as to comply 
with the standard of legal relevancy cannot be reduced to a definite 
rule. The innumerable rulings on the subject will be found to 
depend rather upon the personal views and mental processes of 
particular judges than upon any more definite rule. The positive 
exclusions, on the other hand, generally admit of definite state- 
ment. 



CHAP. II.] MATTERS JUDICIALLY NOTICED. 



CHAPTEE ir. 

MATTERS JUDICIALLY NOTICE n, WITHOUT PROOF.* 

§ 4.^ All civilised nations, as members of tlie great famUy of 
sovereignties, give political acknowledgment of each other's 
existence, and general public and external relations. After such 
acknowledgment by their own country, the existence and titles of 
a state are recognised by the public tribunals and functionaries of 
every nation in the civilised world.^ If, upon a civil war, one 
part of a nation separate from the other, and establish an inde- 
pendent government, the newly-formed nation cannot be recognised 
as such by the judicial tribunals of other nations, until it has been 
acknowledged by the sovereign power under which those tribunals 
are constituted.* The judges of each nation are bound, ex officio, 
to know whether or not their government has recognised a nation 
as an independent state.* 

§ 5. In like manner the judges must recognise, without proof, 
the common^ and statute law,' and all legal claims, demands, 
estates, titles, rights, duties, obligations, and liabilities existing by 



1 See N. York Civ. Code, §§ 1705, _ » Taylor v. Barclay, 1828. There 

1706. it was falsely alleged in the bill, with 

* Gr. Ev. § 4, in great part. the view of preventing a demurrer, 
■' United States of America v. that Guatemala, a revolted colony of 

Wagner, 1867 (Ld. Chelmsford, Ch.). Spain, had been recognized by Great 

But the existence of States unac- Britain as an independent state ; but 

knowledged by the government must the V.-O. took judicial notice that 

be proved by evidence, showing that the allegation was false. See, how- 

they are associations formed for ever, contra. Bolder v. Bk. of Eng., 

mutual defence, supporting their 1805, as to which qy. 

own independence, making laws, and ' Hein. ad Band., L. xxii. t. iii. 

having courts of justice. Yrisari v. § 119. 

Clement, 1826. ' E. v. Sutton, 1817 ; " The Inter- 

* City of Berne v. Bk. of Eng., pretationAot,1889"(52 &53 V.c.63), 
1804. § 9. As to private Acts of Pari., see 

8 & 9 V. c. 113, § 3, cited post, § 7. 

3 b2 



LAWS JUDICIALLY NOTICED. 



[part I. 



the common law, or hj any custom, or created by any statute ; ' 
the rules of equity, and all equitable estates, titles, rights, duties, 
and liabilities^ (while whenever the rules of equity and of the 
common law differ, those of equity must prevail') ; the law of 
nations, the law and custom of parliament, and the privileges and 
course of proceedings of each branch of the legislature ; * the pre- 
rogatives of the Crown,' and the privileges of the royal palaces ; ° 
the maritime law ; ' the ecclesiastical law ; ^ the articles of war, 
whether in the naval,^ the marine, or the land service,'*' including 
those made for the government of the forces in India,'' as well as 
the auxiliary forces, — that is, the militia, the yeomanry, and the 
volunteers,'^ — and also the reserve forces ; " the rules of procedure 
made in pursuance of § 70 of the Army Act, 1881, " whether 
signified under the hand of a secretary of state " in relation to 
the army,'* or promulgated by the admiralty with respect to the 
marines ; '^ royal proclamations, such being acts of State ; '® the 



1 36 & 37 V. 0. 66, § 24, sub-sect. 6 ; 
40 & 41 V. c. 57, § 27, sub-sect. 6, Ir. 

2 See 36 & 37 V. c. 66, § 24, sub- 
Beot. 4. See, also, as to Ireland, 40 
& 41 V. c. 57, § 27, sub-sect. 4, Ir. 

s See 36 & 37 V. c. 66, § 25, 
Bub-sect. 11. See, also, Bustros v. 
White, 1876, 0. A. ; and Palmer v. 
Palmer, 1885. See, also, as to Ireland, 
40 & 41 V. c. 57, § 28, sub-sects. 11, 
29. 

* Lake v. King, 1667 ; Stockdale 
V. Hansard, 1830; Wason v. Walter, 
1869 ; Oassidy V. Steuart, 1841 ; Case 
of the Shefi. of Middlx. 1840 ; Sims 
V. Marryat, 1866; Bradlaugh. v. Gos- 
eet, 1884. 

^ E. V. Elderton, 1703. 

» Id.; Winter u. Miles, 1808; Att.- 
Gen. V. Donaldson, 1842. Hampton 
Court bas ceased to bave privileges 
as a royal palace, Att.-Gen. v. Dakin, 
1869 ; E. V. Ponsonby, 1844. 

' Chandler v. Grieves, 1812. 

8 1 EoU. Abr. 526 ; 6 Vin. Abr. 
496; Sims v. Marryat, 1866 (Ld. 
Campbell). 

s 29 & 30 V. 0. 109 ("The Naval 
Discipline Act, 1866," amended by 
"The Naval Discipline Act, 1884," 
47 & 48 V. c. 39). 

i» See § 69 of "The Army Act, 
1881" (44 & 45 V. 0. 58). As to 



printing of, and amendments to the 
above, see 48 V. o. 8, § 8. See, 
also, as to the Articles of War, § 179, 
sub-sects. 1, 20, of the same Act as 
to the Eoyal Marines. The latter 
articles, it is presumed — though the 
Act is silejit on the subject — must 
be judicially noticed. 

" Id., § 180. 

« Id., §§ 175—178. 

'3 Id., § 190, sub-sect. 9. 

" Id., § 70, sub-sects. 1, 3, amended 
by 49 V. c. 8, § 5. 

^^ Id., § 179, sub-sect. 6. 

i« Dupays v. Shepherd, 1698 (Ld. 
Holt). In Van Omeron v. Dowick, 
1809, Ld. Ellenborough refused to 
take notice of a proclamation, on the 
ground that the Gazette containing 
it was not produced. The latter case 
does not go the length of the mar- 
ginal note, but simply decides that, 
■when a judge's memory is at fault, 
some document must be at hand to 
establish the fact he is called upon 
to notice. Copies of royal proclama- 
tions, if purporting to be printed by 
the Queen's printer, are admissible 
by 8 & 9 V. c. 113, § 3; see post, 
§ 7. They may be proved, also, in a 
variety of other ways. See 31 & 31! 
V. 0. 37, § 2, cited post, § 1527. 



CHAP. 



II.] 



CUSTOMS JUDICIALLY NOTICED. 



general practice of conveyancers ; ' the custom of merchants,'' — at 
least where such custom has been settled by judicial determina- 
tions,' — such, for example, as the lien which a vendor has on 
goods remaining in his possession for unpaid purchase-money ; * or 
the general lien of an innkeper on all the property belonging to 
his guest for the entire amount of his bill ; ^ or the general lien of 
bankers and factors on the securities of their customers in their 
custody ; ^ or the practice of drawing bills of lading in sets, and of 
dealing with one of a set as representing the cargo independently 



1 Willougliby V. "Willougliby, 1Y87 
(Ld. Hardwicke) ; Doe v. Hilder, 
1819; Doe i;. Plowman, 1819; Eowei). 
Grenfel, 1824 (Ld. Tenterden). Ld. 
St. Leonards, in 3 V. & P., 10th edit. 
(1839), at p. 28, observed (tbe passage 
does not appear in recent editions, in 
consequence of the chapter on the 
subject of Attendant Terms, having 
become of little practical importance), 
"It matters very little what is the 
opinion of any individual convey- 
ancer; but the opinion of the con- 
veyancers, as a class, is of the deepest 
importance to every individual of 
property in the state. Their settled 
rule of practice has, accordingly, in 
several instances been adopted as 
the law of the land, not out of respect 
for them, but out of tenderness to 
the numerous purchasers who have 
bought estates under their advice." 
See, also, Howard v. Ducane, 1823 
(Ld. Eldon) ; He Eosher, 1884 (Pear- 
son, J.). 

^ Erskine v. Murray, 1728 ; Soper 
V. Dibble, 1696 ; Carter v. Downish, 
1687 ; Williams v. "Williams, 1693. 

' Barnett v. Brandao, 1843, where 
judicial notice was taken of the 
general lien of bankers on the secu- 
rities of their customers in their 
custody, and Ld. Denman (pronounc- 
ing the judgment of the court) said, 
' ' The law merchant forms a branch 
of the law of England; and those 
customs, which have been universally 
and notoriously pi'evalent amongst 
merchants, and have been found lay 
experience to be of pubUo use, have 
been adopted as a part of it, upon a 
principle of convenience, and for the 
benefit of trade and commerce : and 
when so adopted, it is unnecessary 
to plead and prove them. They are 
binding on all without proof. Ac- 



cordingly we find that usages affect- 
ing bills of exchange and bills of 
lading, are taken notice of judi- 
cially " ; and then gives as in- 
stances the judicial recognition of 
the general lien of factors and 
bankers. This judgment was after- 
wards reversed by the House of 
Lords (see Brandao v. Barnett, 1846), 
but that portion of it which relates 
to judicial notice of the general lien 
of bankers was affirmed. In Edie v. 
E. India Co., 1761, Mr. Just. Wilmot 
observed, ' ' The custom of merchants 
is part of the law of England, and 
courts of law must take notice of it 
as such. There may, indeed, be some 
questions depending upon customs 
amongst merchants, where, if there 
be a doubt about the custom, it may 
be fit and proper to take the opinion 
of merchants thereupon ; yet that is 
only where the law remains doubt- 
ful, and even then the custom must 
be proved by facts, not by opinion 
only; and it must also be subject to 
the control of law." In support of 
the proposition that evidence can only 
be taken as to mercantile custom 
where the law is doubtful, the learned 
judge says, that Ld. Mansfield, 
with Denison and Foster, JJ.'s, re- 
jected the testimony of witnesses to 
prove the usage, solely on the ground 
that the question had already been 
solemnly settled by two adjudications 
in the courts of law. See also Jones 
V. Peppercorn, 1859. 

* Imperial Bk. v. Lend, and St. 
Katherine's Dock Co., 1875 (Jessel, 
M.S.). 

' Mulliner v. Florence, 1878, C. A. 

' See cases cited ante, n. ^, supra, 
p. 5 ; also Lend. Chart. Bk. of Aus- 
tralia V. White, 1878. 



5 



CUSTOMS JUDICIALLY NOTICED. 



[part I. 



of the rest ; ^ or the usage among money dealers of treating scrip 
certificates payable to bearer, whether of a foreign Grovernment or 
of a company, as negotiable instruments transferable on delivery ; ^ 
or the custom of hotel-keepers holding their furniture on hire ; ' 
the customs which regulate the special descent of gavelkind and 
borough English lands,* and it seems any other custom incident to 
such tenures ; ' the custom or law of the road, viz., that horses 
and carriages should respectively keep on the near or left side ;* and 
the following rules with respect to navigation,— first, that ships 
and steamboats, on meeting " end on, or nearly end on, in such a 
manner as to involve risk of collision," should port their helms, so 
as to pass on the port, or left, side of each other ; next, that steam- 
boats should keep out of the way of sailing ships ; and next, that 
every vessel overtaking another should keep out of its way.' Every 
court will moreover take judicial notice of matters appearing in its 
own proceedings. Therefore, if in the course of a case it appear 
that an indictable conspiracy has been committed, it will take 



• Sanders v. Maclean, 1883. 

' Goodwin v. Eobarts, 1876, H. L. ; 
Eumball v. Metrop. Bk., 1877. 
3 Crawcour v. Salter, 1881, 0. A. 

* 1 Bl. Com. 76; Doe v. Souda- 
more, 1705 ; Crosby v. Hetberington, 
1842 (Tindal, C.J.). 

5 Eider v. Wood, 1855 ("Wood, 
V.-C), following Payne v. Barker, 
1659. See also 36 & 37 V. c. 66, 
§ 24, sub-sect. 6. 

^ See Leame v. Bray, 1814, as to 
carriages, and Turley v. Tbomas, 
1837 (Coleridge, J.), as to saddle 
horses. See also 14 & 15 V. o. 92, 
§ 13, Ir. Tbe rule bas been em- 
bodied by Professor Selwyn, in what 
an Etonian would call ' ' Longs and 
Shorts:" — "Sed preoor hoc posthac 
reminisoere, carpe sinistram : Dex- 
tram occurrenti linquere norma 
jubet." In Prance the law of the 
road is different, and horses and 
carriages pass on the off side. 

'' The Eegulations for Preventing 
Collisions at Sea, containing the rules 
concerning lights, fog signals, steer- 
ing and sailing, were embodied in a 
table issued originally under § 25 of 
25 & 26 V. c. 63, since repealed by 
" The Merchant Shipping Act, 1894" 
(57 & 58 V. c. 60), which substitutes 
for it Id., § 418 (1), and of two Orders 



in Council, dated respectively 11th 
August, 1884 (printed 9 P. D". 247), 
as to British ships and boats, and 
14th August, 1879 (printed 4 P. D. 
241), as to foreign ships. As to how 
these regulations are to be published 
and proved, see § 26 of the original 
Act, and for this § 419 (5) of "The 
Merchant Shipping Act, 1894," is 
substituted ; and by § 28 of the original 
Act (§ 419 (3) of "The Merchant 
Shipping Act, 1894"), any damage 
arising from the non-observance of 
these Eegulations shall be prima facie 
presumed to have been caused by 
the wilful default of the person in 
charge of the deck of such ship. See 
post, § 206 ; Gen. St. Navig. Co. v. 
Hedley, 1869; Dryden v. AUix, 1863; 
The Concordia, 1866; The Spring, 
1866. As to the prior law, see Chad- 
wick V. City of DubUn St. Packet 
Co., 1856; Smith v. Voss, 1857; 
Zugasti V. Lamer, 1858 ; Maddox v. 
Pisher, 1851; Williams v. Gutch, 
1857; Tuff V. Warman, 1857. See 
Morrison v. Gen. St. Navig. Co., 
1852; Gen. St. Navig. Co. v. Mor- 
rison, 1856 ; Gen. St. Navig. Co. 
V. Mann, 1855 ; Lawson v. Oarr, 
1856; Churchward v. Palmer, 1856; 
La Plata, 1855; Morgan v. Simj 
1858. 



CHAP. II.] LAWS AND CUSTOMS OF FOREIGN STATES. 



judicial notice of tlie fact though it be not pleaded.^ It will also 
judicially notice the particular customs which have been tried, 
determined, and recorded in such court.^ The customs of London, 
which have been certified by the recorder,' such, for example, as 
the custom of foreign attachment * — the custom that every shop is 
a market overt for the sale of goods of the same kind as usually 
sold there ^ — the custom that married women may be sole traders^ 
— and the custom which defines the nature of a liveryman's office,' — 
will be judicially noticed by the courts in which the certificates 
are recorded.^ No one court can, however, take notice of a custom 
merely because it has been certified to another.® Neither can 
judicial notice be taken of the usages prevalent among mining 
partnerships conducted on the cost-book principle, for the judges 
cannot determine without evidence the meaning of the term 
" cost-book principle." ^^ Nor, again, will the courts take cognisance 
of the laws, usages, or customs of a foreign state ; and even the 
laws of the colonies," or Jersey,'^ Guernsey, or Scotland, must be 
proved as facts,'' unless steps have been taken, either under the 



1 Soott V. Brown, 1892. 

' See Crawcour v. Salter, 1881, 
0. A. 

^ Crosby v. Hetlieringtoii, 1842 ; 
Bruin v. Knott, 1842 ; Blacquiere v. 
Hawkins, 1780 (Ld. Mansfield). See 
Blunt V. Lack, 1857. Uncertified 
customs of London must be proved 
in tbe High. Court, though, they will 
be judicially noticed in the City 
Courts : Stainton and wife u. Jones, 
1779 (Ld. Mansfield). So, also, the 
Q. B. Div. in Ireland will not judi- 
cially notice a custom of the Lord 
Mayor and Sheriff's Court in Dublin, 
unless certified by the recorder : 
Simmonds v. Andrews, 1839 (Ir.). 

1 Certified by Starkey in 22 Ed. 4. 
See 1 Eoll. Abr. 554 K 5 ; Bruce v. 
Wait, 1840 ; Crosby v. Hetherington, 
1842 ; Westoby v. Day, 1853. 

6 Certified by Sir E. Coke, 5 Eep. 
83 b (rather fuller, as L'Evesque de 
Worcester's case, 1594). See Lyons 
V. De Pass, 1840. See, also. Crane 
V. London Dock Co., 1864 ; Har- 
greave v. Spink, 1892. 

* Lavie v. Philb'pa, 1765. Local 
customs, as that of carting whores 
in London, and foreign attachment 



in Bristol, Exeter, Liverpool, and 
Chester, need not be set out on the 
record of a court of the city, as they 
are judicially noticed in the courts 
and of the respective cities (1 Dougl. 
380, n. 96), as they also will be lu a 
court of error. See Bruce v. Wait, 
1840. 

' King V. Clerk, 1695 ; cited 
(Parke, B.) in Piper v. ChappeU, 
1845. 

* The customs as to distribution of 
the personal estate of intestate free- 
men in London, York, and other 
places, are abrogated by 19 & 20 V. 
c. 94. 

' Piper V. ChappeU, 1845 (Parke, 
B.). 

•" In re Bodmm United Mines Co., 
1856. 

'' Prowse V. The European & Amer. 
St. Shipping Co., 1860. 

^^ Brenan's case, 1847 (Patteson, 
J.). 

" Urquhart v. Butterfield, 1888, 
C. A. ; Dakymple v. Dalrymple, 
1811 ; Mostyn v. Eabrigas, 1774 (Ld. 
Mansfield) ; Sussex Peer, case, 1844 ; 
Maleu. Eoberts, 1800 (Ld. Eldon); 
K. r. Povey, 1865 ; Woodham v. Ed- 



SEALS JUDICIALLY NOTICED. [PAET I. 

British Law Ascertaininent Act, 18o9,i or under the Foreign 
Law Ascertainment Act, 1861,2 ^^ obtain a legal opinion on the 
subject from a superior court of the country whose laws are under 
dispute.' The laws of Ireland being substantially the same as 
those of England, except where varied by statute, a very able 
judge has suggested that the English courts would probably 
judicially recognise them.* 

§ 6. The courts will also judicially notice the following seals : — 
the Great Seal of the United Kingdom, and the Great Seals of 
England, Ireland, and Scotland respectively ; ' the Queen's Privy 
Seal and Privy Signet, whether in England, Ireland, or Scotland ; ' 
the Wafer Great Seal, and the Wafer Privy Seal, framed under the 
Crown OfBce Act, 1877 ; ' the seal, and the privy seal, of the duchy 
of Lancaster ; the seal, and the privy seal, of the duchy of Corn- 
wall ; ' the seals of the old superior courts of justice ; and of the 
Supreme Court, and its several Divisions ; the seals of the old 
High Court of Admiralty, whether for England or Ireland ; * of 
the Prerogative Court of Canterbury ; '" and of the Court of the 
Yice- Warden of the Stannaries ; *' the seals of all courts con- 
stituted by Act of Parliament, if seals are given to them by the 
Act; '2 amongst which are the seals of the Court for Divorce and 
Matrimonial causes in England ; ^' of the Court for Matrimonial 
causes and matters in Ireland ; ^* of the Central OfBce of the 
Poyal Courts of Justice, and of its several Departments ; ^' of the 
Principal Registry, and of the several district Registries of the 
Supreme Court of Judicature ; '' of the Principal Registry, and 
of the several district Registries of the old Court of Probate in 

wards, 1836; Wey v. TaUy, 1704; ' 40 & 41 V. c. 41, § 4. 

Story, Confl. § 637, and cases cited « 26 & 27 V. c. 49, § 2. 

in n. See also post, §§ 48, 1423— » Green v. Waller, 1703 ; 24 & 25 

1425. V. c. 10, § 14, now repealed by 44 &45 

1 22 & 23 V. c. 63. V. c. 59 ; 30 & 31 V. c. 114, § 21, Ir. 

i* 24 & 25 V. 0. 11. i» Kempton v. Cross, 1735. 

3 See Lord v. Colvin, 1860; Login " 6 & 7 W. 4, o. 106 ("The Stan- 

V. Princess of Coorg, 1862. naries Act, 1836 "), § 19. 

* Reynolds n.Fenton, 1846 (Maule, '^ Doe v. Edwards, 1839. 

J., explaining Ferguson v. Mahon, '' 20 & 21 V. c. 85 ("The Matri- 

1839). monial Causes Act, 1857 "), § 13. 

» Lord Melville's case, 1806. " 33 & 34 V. o. 110, § 11, Ir. 

« Poggassa's case, 1349, cited in " E. S. 0. 1883, Ord. LXI. rr. 1, 

Olive V. Guin, 1658 ; Lane's case, 6, 7. 

1687. »• 36 & 37 V. c. 66, § 61. 



CHAP. 



11.] 



SEALS JUDICIALLY NOTICED. 



England ^ and of the present Court of Probate in Ireland ; " of 
the old ' and new Courts of Bankruptcy ; * of the Insolvent 
Debtors' Court/ now abolished ; of the Court of Bankruptcy and 
Insolvency in Ireland^ (which, since the 6th of August, 1872, has 
been called " The Court of Bankruptcy in Ireland) ; " ' of the 
Landed Estates Court, Ireland ; * of the Becord of Title OfSoe of 
that Court ; ^ and of the County Courts.'" Courts of law also judi- 
cially notice the seal of the corporation of London." The seal of a 
foreign or colonial notary-public will not generally be judicially 
noticed, although such a person is an officer recognised by the 
whole commercial world. '^ Yarious statutes render different other 
seals admissible in evidence without proof of their genuineness.'^ 



1 20 & 21 V. c. 77 (" The Court of 
Probate Act, 1857"), §22. 

i* 20 & 21 V. c. 79, § 27, Ir. 

3 See 24 & 25 V. c. 134, § 204, and 
32 & 33 V. c. 71, § 109. 

* See 46 & 47 V. c. 52, § 137 ; 
and tlie Baukruptoy Rules of 1883, 
r. 12. See, also, r. 14, as to seals on 
" office copies." 

^ Doe V. Edwards, 1839. 

8 20 & 21 V. o. 60, § 362, Ir. 

' 35 & 36 V. c. 68, § 6, Ir. 

8 21 & 22 V. c. 72 (" Tlie Landed 
Estates Court (Ireland) Act, 1858 "), 
§ 8, Ir. 

3 28 & 29 V. c. 88, § 66, Ir. 

i» 51 & 52 V. c. 43, § 180. 

" Doe V. Mason, 1793 (Ld. Ken- 
yon). 

12 Ee Earl's Trusts, 1858 ; EeDavis's 
Trusts, 1869 (as to seal of a foreign 
notary public); Nye v. Macdonald, 
1870 (as to seal of colonial notary 
public); see, however, contra. Anon., 
1799; Hutoheon v. Mannington, 
1802; Cole v. Sherard, 1855; and 
Furnell v. Stackpoole, 1829 (Ir.). 

'' Such as the seals of the Local 
Government Board for England (34 
& 35 V. 0. 70, § 5) ; or Ireland (35 & 
36 V. c. 69, § 4, Ir.) ; of the late Poor 
Law Board, 10 & 11 V. c. 109 (" The 
Poor Law Board Act, 1847 "), § 5 ; 1 
& 2 V. c. 56 (" The Poor Eehef (Ire- 
land) Act, 1838"), §121, Ir.; 10 & 
11 V. 0. 90 (" The Poor Belief (Ire- 
land) Act, 1847 "), § 3, Ir. ; of the late 
Local Boards of Health (11 & 12 V. 
c. 63, § 35 ; 21 & 22 V. o. 98, s. 4) ; 



and of Urban Sanitary Authorities 
(38 & 39 V. c. 55, § 7) and Joint Sani- 
tary Boards (38 & 39 V. c. 55, § 280 ; 
41 & 42 V. c. 52, § 13, Ir.); of the 
now abolished Commissioners for the 
Sale of Encumbered Estates in Ire- 
laiid (12 & 13 V. c. 77, § 2, Ir. ; see 21 
& 22 V. c. 72, § 23, Ir.) ; of the Land 
Eegistry Office in England (see 25 & 
26 V. c. 63, § 123 ; see also 38 & 39 
V. c. 87, § 107), whether established 
under the Act of 1862 or under that 
of 1875; of the District Eegistry 
Offices created under the Act last re- 
ferred to (38 & 39 V. c. 87, § 120) ; 
of the Office for the Eegistration of 
Assurances of Lands in Ireland (13 
& 14 V. c. 72. § 45, Ir.) ; of the Irish 
Land Commi ■sion (44 & 45 V. c. 49, 
§42, Ir.); of the General Eegister Office 
in England (6 & 7 W. 4, c. 86, § 38 ; 
see 3 & 4 V. c. 92, § 9), or Ireland 
(26 & 27 V. 0. U, § 5, Ir.); of the 
Charity Commissioners for England 
and Wales (16 & 17 V. c. 137, §6; 
and see 18 & 19 V. c. 124, § 4, 
amended by 60 & 61 V. o. 49, and 
§ 5 thereof as to copies and certified 
extracts, and the presumption that 
sealed copies are originals) ; of the 
EaiLway Commissioners (51 & 52 V. 
c. 25, § 2) ; of the Commissioners of 
Her Majesty's Works and Public 
Buildings (16 & 16 V. c. 28 ("The 
Commissioners of Works Act, 1852 "), 
§ 1 ; 37 & 38 V. c. 84, § 2) ; of the 
Board of Agricultiore, which, speak- 
ing generally, now discharges the 
duties of the old Inclosure Commis- 



9 



DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ACT, 1845. [PART I. 

§§ 7—8. The Documentary Evidence Act, 1845 ^ extended the 
principle of admitting in evidence official documents without 
formal proof, to a numerous class of cases. That statute enacts, 
that " whenever hy any Act now in force or hereafter to he in force, 
any certificate, official or public document, or document or pro- 
ceeding of any corporation or joint-stock or other company, or 
any certified copy of any document, by-law, entry in any register 
or other book, or of any other proceeding, shall he receivable in 
evidence of any particular in any court of justice, or before any 
legal tribunal, or either House of Parliament, or any committee 
of either House, or in any judicial proceeding, the same shall 
respectively be admitted in evidence, provided they respectively 
purport to be sealed or impressed with a stamp, or sealed and 
signed, or signed alone, as required, or impressed with a stamp 
and signed, as directed by the respective Acts made or to be 
hereafter made, without any proof of the seal or stamp, where a 
seal or stamp is necessary, or of the signature, or of the official 
character of the person appearing to have signed the same, and 
without any further proof thereof, in every case in which the 
original record could have been received in evidence." By sect. 2, 

sioners, Copyhold Commissioners, established under " The Patents, 

and Tithe Commissioners (45 & 46 Designs, and Trade Marks Act, 

V. c. 38; (see 52 & 53 V. c. 30 1883" (46 & 47 V. c. 67, § 84); 

("The Board of Agriculture Act, and of the Record Office, whether 

1889"), especially § 6, and see also in England (1 & 2 V. c. 94 ("The 

"The Settled Land Act, 1882" (45 Public Record Office Act, 1838"), 

& 46 V. c. 38), amended by "The § 11) or in Ireland (30 & 31 V. 

Settled Land Act, 1884 " (47 & 48 V. c. 70, § 18, Ir.). In aU proceedings, 

u. 18)) ; of the respective Commis- too, under the -winding-up clauses of 

sioners for the Universities of Oxford the Companies Act, 1862, the seal of 

and Cambridge (40 & 41 V. c. 48, any office of the Court of Chancery, 

§§ 4, 9) ; of the Prison Commissioners or Bankruptcy, in England or in 

for England, and of the General Ireland, of the Court of Session in 

Prisons Board for Ireland (40 & 41 Scotland, or of the Court of the Vice- 

V. c. 21, § 6, and c. 49, § 4, Ir.); of Warden of the Stannaries, when ap- 

the special Commissioners for Irish pended to any document made, issued. 

Fisheries (26 & 27 V. c. 114, § 33, or signed under those clauses, or any 

Ir. ; continued by 31 & 32 V. c. Ill ; official copy thereof, must be judi- 

and amended by 32 & 33 V. c. 92, Ir.); cially noticed (25 & 26 V. c. 89, § 126). 

of the Commissioners of Public ' 8 & 9 V. c. 113. The author 

Works in Ireland, at least- for the naturally felt satisfaction in refer- 

purposes of the Drainage Acts (26 & ring to this statute, as he originally 

27 V. 0. 88, §§ 3, 6, Ir. ; 29 & 30 V. suggested to the Law Amend. Soc. 

c. 49, § 21, Ir.), and of " The Settled the alterations embodied therein, and 

Land Act, 1882 " (45 & 46 V. c. 38, prepared the biU founded on them, 

§§ 48, 65, sub-sect. 9); of the office which was carried by Ld. Brougham. 

10 



CHAP. II.] PROOF OF COLONIAL LAWS. 

" all courts, judges, justices, masters in chancery, masters of courts, 
commissioners judicially acting, and other judicial officers, shall 
henceforth take judicial notice of the signature of any " judge of 
the Supreme Court of Judicature,^ "provided such signature be 
attached or appended to any decree, order, certificate, or other 
judicial or official document." By sect. 3, " all copies of private 
and local and personal Acts of Parliament not public Acts, if 
purporting to be printed by the Queen's printers, and all copies of 
the journals of either house of Parliament, and of royal procla- 
mations, purporting to be printed by the printers to the Crown, or 
by the printers to either House of Parliament, or by any or either 
of them, shall be admitted as evidence thereof by all courts, 
judges, justices, and others, without any proof being given that 
such copies were so printed." ** 

§ 9. As to colonial Imvs, an Act of 1865' provides that "the 
certificate of the clerk or other proper officer of a legislative body 
in any colony, to the effect that the document to which it is 
attached is a true copy of any colonial law assented to by the 
Governor of such colony, or of any bill reserved for the signification 
of Her Majesty's pleasure by the said Governor, shall be prima 
facie evidence that the document so certified is a true copy of such 
law or bill, and, as the case may be, that such law has been duly 
and properly passed and assented to, or that such bill has been 
duly and properly passed and presented to the Governor ; and any 
proclamation purporting to be published by authority of the 

' " The Judicature Act, 1873 " or at Ms own discretion, to direct 

(36 & 37 V. c. 66). tliat the same shall be impounded, 

* By § 4, forgery or false printing and be kept in the custody of some 
any of the documents referred to officer of the court or other proper 
above (or, by 31 & 32 Vict. o. 37, person, until further order touching 
§4, cited post, § 1527 in note, any the same shall be given, either by 
proclamation) is made a felony, such court, or the court to which 
punishable by penal servitude, or such master or other officer belonged, 
imprisonment for not less than a or by the persons or person who con- 
year ; and it also is provided that, stituted such court, or by some one 
"whenever any such document as of the equity or common law judges 
before mentioned shall have been of the superior courts at Westminster, 
received in evidence by virtue of on application being made for that 
this Act, the court, judge, commis- purpose." § 5 enacts, that the Act 
sioner, or other person officiating shall not extend to Scotland. Sea 
judiciaUy who shaU have admitted 24 & 25 V. c. 98 ("The Forgery Act, 
the same, shall, on the request ©f 1861 "), §§ 27—29. 
any party against whom the same ^ 28 & 29_V. c. 63 ("The Colonial 
is so received, be authorised, at its Laws Validity Act, 1865 "), § 6. 

11 



FOEEIGN AND COLONIAL DOCUMENTS. [PAET I. 

Governor in any newspaper in the colony to whicli suoh law or 
bill shall relate, and signifying Her Majesty's disallowance of any 
such colonial law, or Her Majesty's assent to any such reserved 
bill as aforesaid, shall be prima facie evidence of such disallowance 
or assent." 

§ 10. As to foreign and colonial documents, Lord Brougham's 
Evidence Act of 1851 ^ enacts, that " all proclamations, treaties, and 
other acts of state of any foreign state, or of any British colony, 
and all judgments, decrees, orders, and other judicial proceedings 
of any court of justice, in any foreign state or in any British 
colony, and all affidavits, pleadings, and. other legal documents 
filed or deposited in any such court, may be proved in any court 
of justice, or before any person having by law or by consent of 
parties authority to hear, receive, and examine evidence, either by 
examined copies, or by copies authenticated as hereinafter men- 
tioned : that is to say, if the document sought to be proved be a 
proclamation,^ treaty, or other act of state, the authenticated copy, 
to be admissible in evidence, must purport to be sealed with the 
seal of the foreign state or British colony to which the original 
document belongs ; and if the document sought to be proved be a 
judgment, decree, order, or other judicial proceeding of any 
foreign or colonial court, or any affidavit, pleading, or other legal 
document filed or deposited in any such court, the authenticated 
copy, to be admissible in evidence, must purport either to be 
sealed with the seal of the foreign and colonial court to which the 
original document belongs, or in the event of such court having no 
seal, to be signed by the judge, or if there be more than one judge, 
by any one of the judges of the said court ; and such judge shall 
attach to his signature a statement in writing on the said copy 
that the court whereof he is a judge has no seal ; but if any of the 
aforesaid authenticated copies shall purport to be sealed or signed 
as hereinbefore respectively directed, the same shall respectively be 
admitted in evidence in every case in which the original document 
could have been received in evidence, without any proof of the 

1 14 & 15 V. c. 99 (" The Evidence c. 60), and 14 & 15 V. c. 99 (" Thg 
Act, 1851 "), § 1. Evidence Act, 1851 "), as to proof 

* See § 365 of "The Merchant of proclamations by governors of 
Shipping Act, 1894 " (57 & 68 V. colonies under the first-named Act, 

12 



CHAP. II.] FOREIGN AND COLONIAL DOCUMENTS. 

seal wliere a seal is necessary, or of the signature, or of the truth 
of the statement attached thereto, where such signature and state- 
ment are necessary, or of the judicial character of the person 
appearing to have made such signature and statement." 

§ 11. The Commissioners for Oaths Act, 1889,^ enables affi- 
davits, &c., to be sworn abroad before consuls, &c. 

§ 12. Order XXXVIII. of the E. S. C, 1883, provides, in 
Eule 6, that " all examinations, affidavits, declarations, affirma- 
tions, and attestations of honour in causes or matters depending in 
the High Court, and also acknowledgments required for the pur- 
pose of enrolling any deed in the Central Office, may be sworn and 
taken in Scotland, or Ireland, or the Channel Islands, or in any 
colony, island, plantation, or place under the dominion of Ser 
Majesty in foreign parts, before any judge, court, notary public, or 
person lawfully authorised to administer oaths^ in such country, 
colony, island, plantation, or place respectively, or before any of 
Her Majesty's consuls or vice-consuls* in any foreign parts out of 
Her Majesty's dominions, and the judges and other officers of the 
High Court shall take judicial notice of the seal or signature, as the 
case may be, of any such court, judge, notary public,^ person, 
consul, or vice-consul, attached, appended, or subscribed to any 
such examinations, affidavits, affirmations, attestations of honour, 
declarations, acknowledgments, or to any other deed or document."^ 

§ 13. Again, the Bankruptcy Act for Scotland^ (passed in 1856) 
facilitates the proof of certain Scottish judicial documents by enact- 
ing, in § 174, that "all deliverances," — which term includes all 
orders, warrants, judgments, decisions, interlocutors, or decrees 
under that Act,' — " purporting to be signed by the Lord Ordiaary, 
or by any of the judges of the Court of Session, or by the sheriff 

> 52 V. c. 10, post, Vol. n. < See ante, p. 9, n. i^. 

* In Baillie v. Jackson, 1853, the " See "The Commissioners for Oaths 
Lords Justices refused to take judi- Act, 1889" (52 V. c. 10). And see, 
cial notice of the signature of the also, Brooke i;. Brooke, 1881 (Pry, J.). 
Eegistrar of Deeds iu St. Vincent to Similar clauses to the rule above are 
a certificate, he admittedly having also contained in ' ' The Court of Ad- 
no authority to administer an oath. miralty (Ireland) Act, 1867" (30 & 31 

' If there be no consul or vice- V. c. 114, § 57, Ir.), and " The Matri- 

consul accessible, an aflBdavit made monial Causes (Ireland) Act, 1871 " 

in foreign parts may be sworn before (34 & 35 V. c. 49, § 17, Ir.). 

a notary public. 'Oooke v, Wilby, « i9 & 20 V. c. 79. 

1884 (Chitty, J.). ' § 4. 

13 



WHAT SIGNATURES ARE JUDICIALLY NOTICED. [PAET I. 

[or sheriff substitute],' as well as all extracts or copies thereof, or 
from the books of the Court of Session, or the Sheriff Court, pur- 
porting to be signed or certified by any clerk of court, or extracts 
from or copies of registers purporting to be made by the keeper 
thereof, or extractor, shall be judicially noticed by all courts and 
judges in England, Ireland, and Her Majesty's other dominions, 
and shall be received as prima facie evidence, without the neces- 
sity of proving their authenticity or correctness, or the signatures 
appended, or the official cheiracter of the person signing, and shall 
be sufficient warranty for all diligence and execution by law com- 
petent." 

§ 14.^ In America, the signature of the Chief of the Executive 
of the State is recognised without proof.^ In Louisiana, also, 
the signatures of executive and judicial officers to all official acts 
are similarly treated.* The English doctrine on this subject is 
difficult of definition. On the one hand, judicial notice will be 
taken of the royal sign manual,*^ and of matters stated under it ; 
of matters stated in the certificate of a principal Secretary of 
State,*^ and of the signatures of the judges of the Supreme 
Court of Judicature, and of the old superior equity and common 
law judges, if appended to any judicial or official document.' 
The legislature has moreover provided that judicial notice shall 
be taken of the signatures of the judges, commissioners and 
registrars of the old courts," and of the judges and registrars 
of the Courts ' of Bankruptcy in England, and of the judges, 
registrars, and chief clerks of the Court of Bankruptcy and 
Insolvency, now called the Court of Bankruptcy,* in Ireland;' 
and has also directed that in all proceedings under the winding- 
up clauses of the Companies Act, 1862, judicial notice shall 
be taken of the signatures of the officers of the old Courts of 

> 19 & 20 V. 0. 79, § 4. any question raised as to tlie neoes- 

^ Gr. Ev. § 6, in part, as to fii'st sity of pi'oving the signature to be 

four lines. genuine. 

3 Jonesv.Gale'sExors.,1817(Ain.). « 8 & 9 V. c. 113, § 2, ante, § 7. 

* Id.; Wood'v. Ktz, 1820 (Am.). « 24 & 25 V. o. 134, § 204; 32 & 

^« Mighell V. Sultan of Johore 33 V. o. 71, § 109. 

(1893), see also post, § 1381 ; Lord ' 46 & 47 V. c. 52, § 137, cited ante, 

Melville's Case (1806) ; E. v. Miller p. 9, n. '. 

(1772), and E. v. Gully (1773). In » 35 & 36 V. t. 58, § 6, Jr. 

neither of the cases last-named was • 20 & 21 V. c. 60, § 362, Ir. 

14 



CHAP. II.] GAZETTES WHEN JUDICIALLY NOTICED. 

Chancery in England or Ireland, or of the Couxts of Bankruptcy 
in England or Ireland, or of the Court of Session in Scotland, or 
of the registrar of the court of the Yice- Warden of the Stannaries, 
whenever such signatures are subscribed to any document made, 
issued, or signed under such clauses, or any official copy thereof,^ 
and that the signatures attached to certain other documents ren- 
dered admissible by statute, need not be proved.''^ On the other 
hand, it has been said that the Courts would probably not recognise 
the signatures of the Lords of the Treasury to their official 
letters.^ Many bodies are, too, by particular statutes, created 
corporations and given a seal, for instance. County Councils ; ' yet 
in each such case the seal must, in the absence of statutory provi- 
sion that judicial notice shall be taken of it, be formally proved.^ 

§ 15. The judges will take notice of the London, DMin, or 
Edinburgh Gazette on its mere production, and it is unnecessary to 
prove that it was bought at the office of the Queen's printer, or to 
offer any evidence as to whence it came.' 

§ 16.* It is unnecessary to prove facts which may certainly be 
known from the invariable course of nature ; such as that a man 
is not the father of a child, where non-access is already proved until 
within six months of the woman's delivery.^ Nor is it necessary to 
prove the course of time,^" or of the heavenly bodies.^' Public 
divisions of time, too, need not be proved, such as the ordinary public 



' 25 & 26 V. c. 89, § 125. seal is given to parish, councils, 

'» 8 & 9 V. 0. 113, § 1, ante, § 1. though they are incorporated. See 

A partial list of the more important 56 & 57 V. o. 73 ("The Local Govern- 

of these documents will be given in ment Act, 1894"), § 3, sub-sect. 9. 

Part iii. Ch. iv., on Public Docu- ' See, further, post, § 87. 

ments. In practice, no proof is re- ' E. v. Forsyth, 1814; 31 & 32 V. 

quired of the handwriting of the o. 37, §§ 2, 5, cited post, § 1527. See 

govei-nor of HoUoway prison (25 & E. v. Holt, 1793. The case E. v. 

26 V. c. 104, § 12), which for all Wallace, 1865 (Ir.), can no longer be 

purposes of law is now regarded as relied upon. See post, § 1527. 

the Queen's Prison. See Alcock v. ^ Gr. Ev. § 5, in part. 

Whatmore, 1840 ; Short v. Williams, » Heathcote's Divorce, 1851, H. L. ; 

1835 ; Pogarty v. Smith, If 33. E. v. Luffe, 1807. 

2 E. V. Jones, 1809 (Ld. Ellen- " See Bury v. Blogg, 1848. 

borough). See 12 & 13 V. b.- 89 " However, in GoUier v. Notes, 

(" The Treasury Instruments (Kgna- 1849, Wilde, C. J., is reported to have 

ture) Act, 1849"), cited post, 5 1106; held that he could not judicially 

and 31 & 32 V. c. 37, cited post, notice at what hour the sun set in the 

§ 1527. month of November. See, also, Tut- 

» 51 & 52 V. c. 41 ("The Local ton v. Darke, 1860 (PoUock, 0. B.). 

Government Act, 1888"), § 79. No Sed qu. P 

IP 



MATTERS JUDICIALLY NOTICED. 



[PAET I. 



fasts and festiTals ; ^ the commeneement or ending of the legal 
sittings;^ the coincidence of the years of the reign of any sovereign 
of this country with the years of our Lord ; ^ the coincidence of 
days of the week with days of the month ; * the order of the 
months ;' the meaning of the word " month." ^ The meaning of 
words in the vernacular language' need not be proved; the 
word " time," for instance, unless specifically stated, indicating 
in Great Britain " Greenwich mean time," and in Ireland " Dublin 
mean time " ; ^ and the word " distance " being, except under 
special circumstances, taken to mean distance measured as the crow 
flies.^ Nor, again, need formal proof be given as to the legal 
weights and measures ; ^'' nor the positive value of the coin of the 
realm ; ^' nor its relative value at different periods of time ; ^^ nor 
matters of history affecting the whole public.^^ 

§ 17.^* Courts also recognice the principal geographical divisions. 



1 6 Vin. Abr. 492, pi. 8—44. 
' 6 Yin. Abr. 490, pi. 32. 
^ Holman v. Buiro-w, 1702 ; E. v. 
Pringle, 1840. 

* 6 Vin. Abr. 492, pi. 6, 7, 8; Hoyle 
V. Ld. Cornwallis, 1720 ; Page v. 
Paucet, 1591 ; Harry v. Broad, 1704; 
BrougK V. Parkins, 1703 (Ld. Holt). 
Thus the court is bound judicially to 
notice what days of the month fall 
on Sundays: Hanson v. Shackelton, 
1835 ; Pearson v. Shaw, 1844. 

* E. V. Brown, 1828. 
^ This formerly, at common law 

and in equity (see Cons. Ord. Oh. 
1860, Ord. XXXVII. i. 10, now an- 
nulled), used to mean four weeks, 
but meant a calendar month when 
used in the ecclesiastical courts 
(Bluck V. Eackman, 1846 (Knight- 
Bruce, V.-O.); Man v. Eioketts, 
1845 (Lord Lyndhurst) ; Simpson 
V. Margitson, 1847 ; 'Johnstone v. 
Hudleston, 1825 (Bayley, J.) ) ; in 
mercantile transactions in the city 
of London (Turner v. Barlow, 1863 
(Erie, O.J.)); or in bills of ex- 
change or promissory notes (45 & 
46 V. c. 61, § 14, sub-sect. 4, and 
§ 89) ; or in any statute passed after 
the year 1850 (The Interpretation 
Act, 1889, of 52 & 53 Vict. c. 63, § 9). 
And month, when used in the Eules 
of the Supreme Court (Ord. LXIV. 
r. 1), or in any judgment or order of 



that court (Id.), unless words be 
added showing lunar month to be 
intended. As to the meaning of ' ' ca- 
lendar month" as applied to imprison- 
ment, see Migotti v. Colville, 1879. 

' dementi v. Golding, 1809, as to 
the meaning of the word "book"; 
Com. V. Kneeland, 1838 (Am.) ; E. v. 
Woodward, 1831. In the last case 
the judges unanimously held that 
they were bound to notice that heans 
were a species of pulse. So in E. v. 
Swatkins, 1831, Patteson, J., after 
conferring with Bosanquet, J., judi- 
cially noticed that barley was corn, in 
an indictment for arson under the 
Act just mentioned. In E. v. Beaney, 
1820, however, the judges refused to 
notice that a colt was an animal of 
the horse species. 

8 43 & 44 V. c. 9, § 1 ; foi-merly 
local time prevailed, see Curtis v. 
March, 1858. 

' Mouflet V. Cole, 1872. 

1" Hockin v. Cooke, 1791 ; O'Don- 
nell V. O'DonneU, 1878 (Ir.) ; 41 & 42 
V. c. 49. 

" Glossop V. Jacob, 1815; Eeaxney 
V. King, 1819. 

" Bryant v. Poot, 1848. 

" See Eead v. Bishop ol Lincoln, 
1892, post, §1785; Bk. of Augusta 
V. Earle, 1839 (Am.). 

" Grr. Ev. § 6, as to first seven lines, 
in great part. 
16 



CHAP. II.3 MATTERS JUDICIALLY NOTICED. 

Thus they judicially notice the territorial extent of the jurisdiction 
and sovereignty exercised de facto by their own government ; ' and 
the local divisions of their country, such as states,^ provinces,' 
counties,* counties of cities, cities,^ towns, parishes, and the like, so 
far as political government is concerned or affected ; and when 
dealing with questions of navigation, the geographical positions 
and the names of places as shown on the Admiralty chart.® But 
courts are not obliged to judicially notice mere local divisions, nor 
their precise limits (further than they may be described in public 
statutes '). Accordingly they have refused to notice judicially that 
" a part of the coast called Suffolk " was not in Kent ; or that 
" Orfordness, in the county of Suffolk," was not situated between 
the North Foreland and Beachy Head ; ' that a particular place is 
within a certain city ; ^ or that a particular town is within a 
certain diocese ; ^^ or that a street mentioned in the pleadings is 
a pubKc thoroughfare, though the word " street," via strata, 
would rather imply that it was ; " or that a particular street is 
not in a certain county, though it be notorious that a street 
bearing the same name is in another county ; '^ or that a city 

' See " Tlie Foreign Jurisdiction and, as sucli, prima facie liable to 

Act, 1890 " (53 & 54 V. c. 37), legal- repair bridges within it. In Harris 

izing acts done in dominions acquired v. O'Logblen, 1871 (Ir.), tbe M. E. 

by 6 & 7 V. 0. 94, treaty, capitula- took judicial notice of tbe baronies 

tion, grant, usage, sufferance, or in an Irish, county, such baronies 

other lawful means. One of Her having been enumerated in 13 & 14 

Majesty's principal secretaries of V. c. 68, Sch. A. (repealed by 54 & 

state, in answer to question put by 55 V. c. 67). 

any court in the Queen's dominions, ' E. v. St. Maurice, 1851. 

is required, within a reasonable time ° Birrell v. Dryer, 1884. 

in that behalf, to cause proper and ' Deybel's case, 1821 ; Fazakerley 

sufficient answers to be returned to v. Wiltshire, 1720 ; E. v. Burridge, 

all such questions, which answers 1735 ; Thorne v. Jackson, 1846. 

^^, upon 'produciion thereof , he final * Deybel's case, 1821. In Eirby 

and conclusive evidence, in the suit or v. Hickson, 1850, the court refused 

other proceedings, of the several to take judicial notice that Park 

matters therein contained. Street, Grosvenor Square, in Middle- 

' Whyte V. Eose, 1842. There the sex, was within twenty miles of 

court noticed, that by ' ' the kingdom Eussell Square, in the same county, 

of Ireland " was meant that part of ' In Brune v. Thompson, 1842, 

the United Kingdom called Ireland. where the plaintiff was nonsuited 

^ Id. for not proving that the Tower of 

* Deybel's case, 1821. In 2 Inst. London was within the City of 

557, it is said "the King's courts" London, 

"take notice of all the counties of " E. v. Simpson, 1738. 

England." In E. v. Isle of Ely, " Grant v. Moser, 1843 (Tindal, 

1850, the court judicially noticed C.J.). 

that the Isle of Ely was a division " Humphreys v. Budd, 1841. See 

of a county in theijature of a riding, Thorne v. Jackson, 1846. 

T. — VOL. I. 17 



MATTERS JUDICIALLY NOTICED. [PAET I. 

mentioned in a document is in a particular country, even though 
it apf.ear that one with a similar name is the capital of such 
country.^ They have, however, noticed that the Queen's Prison is 
situated in England.^ 

§ 18.' The courts will, too, judicially recognise the political 
constitution or frame of their own government; its essential 
political agents or public officers sharing in its regular adminis- 
tration ; and its essential and regular political operations and 
actions. Accordingly, all tribunals notice the accession and 
demise of the sovereign of their country ; * the heads of depart- 
ments, and the principal officers of state, whether past or present ; ' 
the marshals and sheriffs, but not the deputies of these func- 
tionaries ; ^ the existence of a war in which their country is 
engaged, at least when such war is recognised in public proclama- 
tions or Acts of Parliament ; ' the days of special public fasts and 
thanksgivings, when recognised in like manner ; the stated days of 
general political elections ; the date and place of the sittings of the 
legislature ; ^ and, in short, " all public matters which affect 
the government of the country."^ And though they were not 
formerly so,^" the journals of either House of Parliament are now 
evidence, if they purport to be printed by the official printers.^' 
But the coiirts will not recognise private orders made at the 
council-table ; ^^ nor, it seems, any orders of Council, even though 
they regard the Crown and the government.^' 

1 Kearney v. King, 1819. There « See Grant v. Bagge, 1802. 

it was teld tliat a declaration on a ' Dolderu. Ld. Huntingfield, 1805; 

bill drawn and accepted at Dublin, E. v. De Berenger, 1814. When war 

to wit, at Westminster, for 5i2l., is neither publicly proclaimed, nor 

must be taken to be on a bill drawn noticed in any statute, its existence 

in England for English money, and is solely a question for the jury : 1 

that therefore proof of a bill drawn Hale, 164; Eost. 0. L. d. 1, o. 2, § 12. 

at Dublin in Ireland for Irish money. The existence of war between foreign 

which is of less value, was a fatal countries will not be judicially no- 

varianoe. ticed : Dolder v. Ld. Huntingfield, 

2 Wickens v. Goatly, 1851. 1805 (Ld. Eldon). 

3 Or. Ev. § 6, in part. s g. „_ WUde, 1669 ; Birt v. Eoth- 
* Holman v. Bui-row, 1702 ; E. v. well, 1697. 

Pringle, 1840. » Taylor v. Barclay, 1828. 

5 E. V. Jones, 1809; Bennett v. >« E. v. Knollys, 1694. 

The State of Tennessee, 1826 (Am.) ; " 8 & 9 V. c. 113, § 3, cited ante, 

Whaley v. OarHsle, 1866 (Ir.) (where § 7. 

the court judicially noticed that '^ 6 Vin. Abr. 490. 

Lord Hawkesbury had been foreign " Att.-Gen. v. Theakstone, 1820. 

minister in 1803). See post, §§ 1527, 1664. 

18 



CHAP. II.] MATTERS JUDICIALLY NOTICED. 

§ 19. Lastly, each Division of the Supreme Court is hound to 
judicially notice its own rules and course of proceeding ; ^ the rules 
and practice of the other Divisions ; ^ and also the limits of 
their respective jurisdictions,' — as, for instance, that the Probate, 
Divorce, and Admiralty Division has so far jurisdiction over the 
personal estate of an intestate British subject, whether situated in 
Ireland, the colonies, or any foreign country, that it may grant 
letters to administer such property, and must do so before the 
administrator can sue in any English Court in respect thereof.* 
All courts will further notice the privileges of their officers^ and 
solicitors,^ a term which now includes both " attorneys" and 
" proctors" ; ' and also the fact that the assizes, though constituting 
for some purposes one legal day, may be continued from day to 
day with or without adjournment, and often occupy several natural 
days ; ^ the existence of courts of general jurisdiction ; ^ the powers 
of the Ecclesiastical Courts ; and the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy 
Courts,^" together with all general rules under that Act, whether 
made by the Lord Chancellor, with the concurrence of the President 
of the Board of Trade, for carrying into effect its objects,^^ or made 
by the Board of Trade, for regulating matters of an administrative 
character under it, if printed by the Queen's printers, purporting 
to be issued under the authority of the Board.^^ Judicial notice 
must also be taken of the rules made under the Bankruptcy 
(Ireland) Amendment Act, 1872. '^ Certain other rules made 
under statutory authority are likewise judicially noticed.^* 

' Dotson V. BeU, 1676 ; Pugh v. " Id. § 127. 

Robinson, 1786. " Bankruptcy Eules, 1883, r. 237. 

2 Lane's case, 1587 ; Worlicli v. " 35 & 36 V. o. 58, § 124, Ir. 

Massey, 1605 ; Moimson v. Bourn, '* The principal of these are rules 

1648 ; Eeidy v. Pierce, 1861 (Jr.) made by the Board of Trade under 

(Pigot, O.B.) ; CaldweU v: Hunter, "The Gas and Water "Works Pacili- 

1848. ties Act, 1873" (36 & 37 V. c. 89), 

' Doe V. Caperton, 1829. See § 14 ; those made either by Order 

Spooner v. Juddow, 1848. in Council, or by the Committee of 

* See Whyte y. Rose, 1842. Council, under "The Crown Office 
« Ogle V. NoroUfEe, 1708. Act, 1877" (40 & 41 V. c. 41), §§ 3, 

* Stokes V. Mason, 1808; Chatland 5; those made by the Lord Chan- 
V. Thornley, 1810; Hunter •;;. Neck, cellor, under " The Summary Juris- 
1841 ; WaUord v. Fleetwood, 1845. diction Act, 1879" (42 & 43 V. c. 49), 

' Jud. Act, 1873 (36 & 37 V. c. 66), § 29 ; those made by the Lord 

§ 87. Chancellor with the assistance of the 

" Whitaker v. Wisbey, 1852. Registrar, under "The Land Trans- 

» Tregany v. Fletcher, 1696. fer Act, 1875 " (38 & 39 V. o. 87), 

» 46 & 47 V. c. 52, §§ 92 et seq. § 111; those made under "The 

19 c2 



REFRESHING MEMORY OF JUDGE. [PART I. 

§ 20. It is not clear whether or not the judges of the Supreme 
Court of Judicature are bound to notice who are the judges in 
inferior courts of record. The weight of American authorities is 
in favour of recognising them;^ but the Court of Queen's Bench 
once refused to notice who was judge of the then Court of Review.^ 
The Supreme Court will not, unless when called upon to review 
their judgments,^ take cognizance of the customs and proceedings 
in inferior courts of limited jurisdiction,* except so far as they are, 
regulated by statute.^ 

§ 21.^ Where matters ought to be judicially noticed, but the 
memory of the judge is at fault, he resorts to such means of refer- 
ence as may be at hand, and he may deem worthy of confidence.' 
Thus, if the point be a date, he may refer to an almanac ; * if it be 
the meaning of a word, to a dictionary;^ if it be the construction 
of a statute, to the printed copy ; or, in case that appears to be in- 
correct, to the parliament roll.^" In some instances, the judge has 
refused to take cognizance of a fact, unless the party calling upon 
him to do so could produce at the trial some document by which 
his memory might be refreshed. Thus Lord Ellenborough^' once 
declined to take judicial notice of the King's proclamation, the 
counsel not being prepared with a copy of the Gazette in which it 
was published ; and iu a case in which it became material to con- 
sider how far the prisoner owed obedience to his sergeant, and this 
depended on the articles of war, the judges thought that these 
ought to have been produced. ^^ In other cases, the courts have 
themselves made the necessary inquiries, and that, too, without 

Landlord and Tenant (Ireland) Act, Lane's case, 1587 ; Peacock v. BeU, 

1870," either by tie Court for Land 1667 ; and Dance v. Eobson, 182v). 

Cases Reserved, or by the Privy * As, e.g., the Court of the V.-Cli. 

Council in Ireland (33 & 34 V. c. 46, of Oxforii, now regulated by 17 & 18 

§§31, 41, Ir.); and those made by V. o. 81 ("The Oxford University 

the Irish Land Commission (see 44 & Act, 1854 ), § 45. 

45 V. 0. 49, § 60, subs. 2, Ir.). « Gr. Bv. § 6, as to first three lines. 

1 Hawks V. Kennebec, 1811 (Am.); ' Gresl. Ev. 295. 
Eipleyi).Warren,1824(Am.);I)espau * Page v. Faucet, 1591. See 
V. Swindler, 1825 (Am.). Tutton v. Darke, 1860. 

2 Van Sandau v. Turner, 1845. * Clementi v. Grolding, 1809. 

3 Chittyi;. Dendy, 1835. i» E. ■;;. Jeffries, 1722; Spring v. 
" E. V. U. of Cambridge, 1736, Eve, 1677. 

where the court refused to notice " InVan Omeroni;. Dowick, 1809. 

that the University Court in Cam- ^' E. v. Withers, undated (Buller, 

bridge proceeded according to the J.), cited in E. ii. Holt, 1793 (Buller, 

rules of the civil law. See, also, J.). 

20 



CHAP. II.] EEFEESHING MEMORY OF JUDGE. 

strictly confining their researches to the time of the trial. Thus, 
where ^ the question was, whether the Federal Eepublic of Central 
America had been recognised by the British Government as an 
independent state, a Vice- Chancellor sought for information from 
the Foreign Office ; in another case, the Court of Common Pleas 
directed inquiry to be made in the Court of Admiralty as to the 
maritime law ; ^ and the same Court also once made inquiry as to 
the practice of the Inrolment Office in the Court of Chancery;' 
while Lord Hardwicke * asked an eminent conveyancer respecting 
the existence of a general rule of practice in the latter's profession. 

1 Taylor v. Barclay, 1828. See, 1620. 

also. The Oharkieli, 1878. * Willougliby v. WiUoughby, 1'787. 

' Chandler v. Grieves, 1792. See, also, Er. S. 0. 1883. Old. LI. 

3 Doe V. Lloyd, 1840, acting on rr. 7, 8. 
the authority of "Worsley v. Filisker, 

21 



21^ AMERICAN NOTES. [PART I. 



AMERICAN NOTES. 

§ 4. Judicial Notice. — Certain facts a judge or jury will adopt 
as the basis of action without requiring the party to whose case 
they are essential to prove them by evidence. These facts, while 
having the common feature that a judge will not require them 
to be proved because he knows them already, are of two classes. 

Some facts the judge is bound to take notice of or, in other words, 
know, at his peril. If he does not treat them as proved, in any 
case in which they are relevant, such conduct is error in law. The 
party aggrieved by a failure to recognise and adopt matters which 
the judge is bound judicially to know, may have the error cor- 
rected, upon proper proceedings, in a superior court, for all judges 
in the jurisdiction are equally bound to know them. Strictly 
speaking, it is not the duty of counsel to suggest them. It is the 
duty of the court to know them. 

Another class of facts the judge is not, as before, bound to know, 
but as judges (and other men) usually know them he may fairly be 
assumed to know them. If a particular judge is not actually aware 
of any particular one of these facts, he may or he may not, as he sees 
fit, inform himself from any source, including the parties to the 
action. If he does not choose to inform himself, it is the duty of 
counsel to supply him with the needed information. If the court 
still declines to know such fact, it must be proved in the ordinary 
way or the party will lose the benefit of it, without redress in a 
superior court. Such facts are usually those of common knowledge. 

The judge in any particular trial has a dual capacity. He is, in 
the first place, a part of the administration of government, estab- 
lished for the purpose of enforcing certain standards of conduct, 
reasoning and liability, rules of law or practice, which have been 
established by the sovereign power of the jurisdiction in which the 
court is sitting. In the second place, he is an intelligent member 
of the community in which he resides. As such, he knows what is 
generally known to others in the community. These facts, usually 
not disputed and capable of easy verification if disputed, may, as a 
rule, be safely assumed to be true unless and until disputed or dis- 
proved. In other words, there is in many cases no need for proving 
to a person of average intelligence what every one assumes to be 
true, unless the fact is disputed. As Lord Ellenborough said in 
Peltier's Case (28 State Trials, 616) (1803), speaking of an admission 
that Napoleon Buonaparte was Chief Consul and France and England 
at peace on a certain date, " They were capable of easy proof if they 
had not been admitted. Their notoriety seems to render the actual 
proof very unnecessary." 

The division into two classes of the facts which, as is said, need 



CHAP, n.] AMBEICAN NOTES. 21^ 

not be proved, because judges already know them, follow with 
general correctness this division between the official and personal 
capacity of judges. In other words, matters of law or established 
by law are matters of required cognisance ; matters of fact are the 
subject of optional cognisance. When it is said a judge takes 
judicial notice of the statute law of his state a somewhat different 
thing is meant than when it is said that he knows, without proof, 
the date of the battle of Lexington. The judge may really be 
equally ignorant on both these points. The statute in question 
may but just have been enacted and the actual knowledge of it 
confined to a few officials at the seat of legislation. The judge may 
never have read or heard the date of the battle. But the fact of 
the statute he must know at the peril of committing error. The 
other fact he may be assumed to know ; but if he does not, he com- 
mits no error in law in refusing to assume its truth as part of a 
decision. The one refusal may be rectified in an appellate or 
superior court. The other will not. 

Eor example, in a case where both the court and parties assumed 
the existence of a law which had been repealed, relief by a new 
trial was granted although the point was not taken at the trial. 
Belmont v. Morrill, 69 Me. 314 (1879). 

International Relations. — Among the facts established by law 
of which courts, as part of the administration of government, are 
bound to take judicial notice are the existence of other nations, their 
sovereignty and forms of government, and the seals and other usual 
emblems or indicia of such sovereignty or government. Courts take 
cognisance of the great seal of any nation recognised by the govern- 
ment under which the Court is acting, e. g. Portugal, Church v. 
Hubbart, 2 Cranch, 186 (1804) ; Denmark, Griswold v. Pitcairn, 2 
Conn. 86 (1816) ; Lincoln v. Battelle, 6 Wend. 475 (1831). 

Such a seal is said to " prove itself," Watson v. Walker, 23 JST. H. 
471, 496 (1851), speaking of the great seal of England. 

The same rule applies in the courts of one state of the Union to 
the great seal of a sister state, e. g. of a copy of a Maryland statute 
authenticated by the great seal of Maryland when offered in a court 
in Pennsylvania, U. S. v. Johns, 4 Dall. 412 (1806) ; so in New York 
of a Michigan record, Coit v. Millikin, 1 Denio, 376 (1846), and in 
Maine of a Massachusetts record, Eobinson v. Gilman, 20 Me. 299 
(1841). It was held in Coit v. Millikin that the seal required must 
be one good at common law, " an impression upon wax, wafer, or 
some other tenacious substance," and that, in the absence of an 
enabling statute, " an impression upon paper alone (as in that case) 
is not a seal." 

But see Pierce v. Indseth, 106 U. S. 546 (1882) contra. 

The seal of the United States government will be recognised in a 
state court. Yount v. Howell, 14 Cal. 465 (1869) ; and the seal of 



21^ AMEBICAN NOTES. [PABT I. 

a state in the courts of the United States, U. S. v. Amedy, 11 Wheat. 
392 (1826). 

The seal of a district court of the United States proves itself 
either in a state or federal court, and the records of such court need 
not be proved in- any other way than under the seal of the court as 
affixed by the clerk. The rule is thus clearly and succinctly stated : 
— " Circuit and district courts of the United States certainly cannot 
be considered foreign in any sense of the term, either in respect to 
the state courts in which they sit, or as respects the circuit or dis- 
trict court of another circuit or district. On the contrary, they are 
domestic tribunals, whose proceedings all other courts of the country 
are bound to respect, when authenticated by the certificate of the 
clerk under the seal of the court, the rule being that the circuit 
court of one circuit or the district court of one district is presumed 
to know the seal of the circuit or district court of another circuit 
or district, in the same manner as each court within a state is pre- 
sumed to know and recognise the seal of any other court within the 
same state." Turnbull v. Payson, 95 U. S. 418 (1877) ; Womacki;. 
Dearman, 7 Porter, 513 (1838). " It will not be denied that the con- 
stitution of the United States and the laws of congress passed in 
pursuance thereof, will be judicially recognised by the courts of this 
state. The several courts of the United States are called into exist- 
ence by act of congress under the constitution, and their powers and 
duties specifically defined by statute ; such courts, therefore, together 
with their seals, will also be judicially recognised." Adams v. Way, 
33 Conn. 419 (1866). 

The great seal of the Province of Upper Canada of itself imports 
verity. Lazier v. Westcott, 26 N. Y. 146 (1862). 

So the courts of a nation will so far take cognisance of the sove- 
reignty of insurgents recognised as belligerents by the executive or 
legislative branches of the government as to decline to inquire into 
the title or commission of their public vessels. Santissima Trinidad, 
7 Wheat. 283, 335 (1822). 

In a case where the condemnation of a vessel for a fraud on the 
revenue laws of St. Domingo during the French occupancy of the 
island was a fact in issue, the attestation of the proper British author- 
ities who had subsequently conquered and then held the island, was 
deemed sufiELcient, though " certified only under the governor's seal 
at arms, instead of a colonial or public seal." Hadfield v. Jameson, 
2 Munf. (Va.), 53, 70 (1809). 

Probably this knowledge on the part of judges of the international 
relations of the government under which they act is, historically, a 
survival of the ideas of the time when judges sat as the direct rep- 
resentatives of the king ; and might therefore be required to know 
what the king himself knew in other branches of his sovereignty, 
e. g. his relation to other nations. 



CHAP. n.J AMEEICAN NOTES. 21* 

So the limits of the nation is rather a political than a legal ques- 
tion, the action of the executive controlling that of the courts, who 
will support the action of the co-ordinate branch of the government. 
Foster v. Neilson, 1 Peters, 263 (1829). 

It is, therefore, for the executive or legislative branch of govern- 
ment to take the initiative in these international matters. Conrts 
will decline knowledge of the existence of sovereignties not yet rec- 
ognised by the executive and legislature. The rule is that " where 
the political authorities of the State have actually claimed and exer- 
cised jurisdiction over particular localities . . the courts are thereby 
concluded, and have only to declare the fact and govern themselves 
accordingly, without undertaking to pass on the validity of such 
claim." State v. Wagner, 61 Me. 178 (1873). « The seal of such 
unacknowledged government cannot be permitted to prove itself ; 
but it may be proved by such testimony as the nature of the case 
admits." U. S. v. Palmer, 3 Wheat. 610, 634 (1818). 

Public Laws. — It being their first and distinctive duty, as part 
of the government, to enforce certain established rules of law and 
general standards of conduct, courts are required to know, with- 
out proof, the laws and standards they are constituted to enforce. 
Speaking generally, and disregarding private statutes and acts of 
local application, courts take judicial cognizance of the existence 
and scope of all legal rules to which they are commissioned by the 
sovereign of their country to compel obedience. 

Law of Nations. — The law of nations being part of the public 
law of each jurisdiction receives judicial notice. 

So of the rules of navigation adopted by commercial nations. 
The Scotia, 14 Wall. 171 (1871). As the court in that case say: 
" Foreign municipal laws must indeed be proved as facts, but it is 
not so with the law of nations." For the same reason, what is 
part of the general law merchant " is matter of law for the court," 
— i. e. will be judicially noticed. Jewell v. Center, 25 Ala. 498, 605 
(1864). For " the principles of the law merchant . . . have become 
a part of the common law." Munn v. Burch, 25 III. '35, 38 (1860). 
Or, as the court in a New Jersey case (Reed v. Wilson, 41 N. J. 
Law, 29 (1879) say, in taking judicial notice that a note payable 
on a certain day was properly protested on the day previous : 
"The court must take judicial notice not only of the law merchant, 
which is a part of the common law, but also of the almanac, from 
which it appears that the 15th day of December, 1872, fell on 
Sunday." To same effect, Sasscer v. Farmers' Bank, 4 Md. 409 
(1853) holds that Sundays and great festivals such as Christmas are 
dies non juridici in commercial usage. 

It has, however, been held that while the general maritime law is 
the basis of the law of the United States, it is, having no inherent 
force of its own, only so far operative in any country as it has been 



21^r AJVIEEICAN NOTES. [PAET I. 

adopted by the laws and usages of the country. The Lottawanna, 
21 Wall. 658, 573 (1874); The Scotland, 105 U. S. 24 (1881). 

As courts of admiralty are tribunals recognised by the law of 
nations, their seals need not be proved. Thompson v. Stewart, 3 
Conn. 171, 181 (1819) ; Yeaton v. Fry, 5 Cranch, 335 (1809) . So 
of the general customs of trade. "We cannot close our eyes," 
say the supreme court of the United States, "to the well known 
course of business in the country." Bank of Kentucky v. Adams 
Express Co. 93 U. S. 185 (1876) ; Wiggins Ferry Co. v. C. & A. 
E. Co., 5 Mo. App. 347, 376 (1878). But the custom, to be noticed 
without proof, must be one of the commercial world. A com- 
mercial custom adopted by local authority, e. g. a broker's board, 
must be proved. " The court will not take judicial cognisance of 
those rules, unless they are rules or usages of trade and commerce, 
which would be recognised without their adoption by any particular 
board or association." G-oldsmith v. Sawyer, 46 Cal. 209 (1873). 

The New York courts place " the general course of business in a 
community, including the universal practice of banks " in the second 
class ; i. e. among matters of optional cognisance •' of which courts 
may take judicial notice." Merchants Bank v. Hall, 83 IST. Y. 338 
(1881) ; Yerkes v. National Bank, 69 N. Y. 382 (1877) ; Hunter v. 
N. Y. &c. R. R., 116 N. Y. 615 (1889). 

Where the indicia of title to certain goods to be forwarded were 
assigned to a merchant to secure his advances, the court say that it 
is " the usual course of the great inland commerce " for agricultural 
produce between the Mississippi Valley and markets. "It has 
existed long enough to assume a regular form of dealing and it 
embraces such a wide extent of territory and is of such general 
importance, that its ordinary course and usages are now publicly 
recognised and understood ; and it is the duty of the court to 
recognise them, as it judicially recognises the general and estab- 
lished usages of trade on the ocean." Gibson v. Stevens, 8 How. 
384, 399 (1850). 

Of a custom for merchants to exchange mutual credits, the 
supreme court of Michigan say : ■ — " We must take judicial notice 
of a custom which is familiar everywhere." Cameron v. Blackman, 
39 Mich. 108 (1878). 

The powers of a notary public, being an officer recognised by the 
law merchant in the protest of foreign bills of exchange, will be 
noticed by the court and his "seal proves itself in all countries 
where the law merchant prevails, and it is only necessary that it 
should conform to the law of the place where the notary acts." 
Orr V. Lacey, 4 McLean, 243 (1847). "The court will take judicial 
notice of the seals of notaries public, for they are officers recognised 
by the commercial law of the world." Pierce v. Indseth, 106 U. S. 
646 (1882) ; Delafield v. Hand, 3 Johns. 310, 314 (1808). 



CHAP, n.] AMERICAN NOTES. 21^ 

See also Brown v. Phila. Bank, 6 S. & R. 484 (1821). 

The recognition does not extend to the power to attest deeds. 
Nye V. McDonald, 2 Low. Can. Jurist, 109 (1857). Neese v. Farm- 
ers Ins. Co., 55 la. 604 (1881). 

But the courts will not recognise without proof the right of 
other officers empowered by local laws 'to protest negotiable instru- 
ments, e. g. a huissier in France. Chanoine v. Fowler, 3 Wend. 177, 
178 (1829). So of the certificate of a consul. Church v. Hubbart, 
2 Granch, 186 (1804). 

In certain cases a notarial seal has been considered a sufficient 
certification of the proceedings of a foreign court. Yeaton v. Fry, 
5 Cranch, 336 (1809); Fellows v. Menasha, 11 Wise. 658 (1860). 

While a notarial protest of a promissory note is not, strictly 
speaking, an oflScial act, such protest duly authenticated by his 
signature and seal is competent secondary evidence, after his de- 
cease, of the facts stated in the protest, " because it is in the usual 
course of their duty and business to keep such memoranda." Porter 
V. Judson, 1 Gray, 175 (1854). 

The seal may be made directly on the paper without wax or other 
adhesive substance. Pierce v. Indseth, 106 U. S. 546 (1882). 

This judicial knowledge of the law merchant cannot be so far 
extended as to embrace local customs. The local customs of miners 
as to location of claims must be proved by competent evidence. 
Sullivan v. Hense, 2 Col. 424 (1874) ; Pougade v. Ryan, 21 Nev. 
449 (1893). The usages and customs of Indian tribes "must be 
regarded as facts, and must be averred and proved like any other 
material facts." Turner v. Fish, 28 Miss. 306 (1864). Courts will 
require proof of local rights in water for irrigation purposes 
even when such rights have been recognised by statute. Lewis v. 
McClure, 8 Oreg. 273 (1880). But see Amer. Nat. Bk. v. Bushey, 45 
Mich. 135, 140 (1881) that the customers of a bank will be assumed 
to know the " ordinary rules and necessities of business." 

Federal Laws. — The constitution of the United States being 
the supreme law of the land, all courts, state and national, take 
notice without proof of certain public acts done in the exercise of 
the powers conferred by that instrument. 

Constitution of the Federal Government. — Courts are 
required to take notice of the office of president of the United 
States, its incumbent and his signature. 

So in speaking of a United States patent to lands, the supreme 
court of California say: "The patent proves itself and requires 
no authentication other than the signature of the president and the 
seal of the government. The court takes judicial notice of both 
signature and seal." Yount v. Howell, 14 Cal. 465 (1859). 

Where a patent was signed by an acting commissioner of patents, 
it was held unnecessary to aver or prove that he was legally entitled 



21^ AMEEICAN NOTES. [PAET I. 

to act in that capacity. "The court will take notice judicially of 
the persons who from time to time preside over the patent office, 
whether permanently or transiently, and the production of their 
commission is not necessary to support their official acts." York 
&c. R. Co. V. Winans, 17 How. 30 (1854). 

"State courts are bound to take judicial notice of the existence 
of the federal courts." Mims v. Swartz, 37 Tex. 13 (1872); 
Headman v. Rose, 63 Ga. 468 (1879). "We all know that the 
circuit courts of the several states are courts of general jurisdic- 
tion, as well as we know that courts of justice of the peace are not; 
and why should judges assume a degree of ignorance on the bench 
which would be unpardonable in them when off of it ? " Jarvis v. 
Eobinson, 21 Wise. 523 (1867). 

So of the existence and powers of the president of the United 
States. The proclamation of the president of the United States is 
" a public act of which all courts of the United States are bound 
to take notice and to which all courts are bound to give effect." 
Armstrong v. U. S., 13 Wall. 154 (1871). So of the departments of 
state, and public acts in pursuance of their legal powers, e. g. the 
instructions of the navy department to the naval commanders 
of the United States. The Peterhoff, Blatch. Pr. Cases, 463, 506 
(1863). 

But courts " are not bound to take official notice of the rules 
adopted for the regulation of the different departments of the 
federal government or those established by the board of land 
commissioners or surveyor general of the United States for Cali- 
fornia." Heusley v. Tarpey, 7 Cal. 288 (1857). Otherwise of the 
action of the federal land office when regulated by statute. Bige- 
low V. Chatterton, 51 Fed. Rep. 614 (1892). 

As treaties properly executed under constitutional prerogative 
are part of the law of each jurisdiction in the United States, all 
courts take judicial notice of them. Thus, in an action of slander 
charging a murder in Ireland judicial notice will be taken that 
under the " Ashburton treaty " between Great Britain and the 
United States, murder is an extraditable offence in this country. 
Montgomery v. Deeley, 3 Wise. 709 (1854). The effect of the treaty 
of Paris, ceding Louisiana to the United States, is judicially noticed 
in relation to the land titles of that state. U. S. v. Eeyner, 9 How. 
127 (1850). The rule includes treaties between the United States 
and Indian nations. Carson v. Smith, 5 Minn. 78 (1860) ; U. S. v. 
Beebe, 2 Dak. 292 (1880) ; Lewis v. Harris, 31 Ala. 689 (1858). 
But where a treaty confers authority upon certain persons to do 
certain acts, courts, while recognising the existence of the authority 
without proof, will require proof of the manner in which the author- 
ity was, in point of fact, exercised. Thus, where a right to select 
a certain amount of land was conferred by a treaty with the Chip- 



CHAP, n.] AMERICAN NOTES. 21^ 

pewa Indians, proof was required of the manner in which the right 
was exercised, when that fact was material. Dole v. Wilson, 16 
Minn. 625 (1871). The public acts of congress, for similar reasons, 
are within the judicial knowledge of all courts, state and national. 
Cox V. Morrow, 14 Ark. 603 (1854). 

Eor example, judicial notice is taken of the national bankruptcy 
law. Morris v. Davidson, 49 Ga. 361 (1873) ; Mims v. Swartz, 37 
Tex. 13 (1872). Even if such public act of congress relates to the 
District of Columbia, Bayly's Adm. v. Chubb, 16 Gratt. 284 (1862) ; 
or concerns exclusively the municipal affairs of the District of 
Columbia. Chesapeake Ohio Canal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Rail- 
road Company, 4 Gill & J. 1, 63 (1832). Therefore where the laws 
of Maryland were by act of congress continued in the District of 
Columbia, the courts of Virginia take judicial notice of these laws. 
Bird's Case, 21 Gratt. 800 (1871). So of the acts of congress relat- 
ing to the " disposition of the public lands, and the kind of evidence 
furnished to a purchaser and the system of surveys adopted for those 
lands by congress." Gooding -u. Morgan, 70 111. 275 (1873) ; Scrapie 
V. Hagar, 27 Cal. 163 (1865) ; Papin v. Ryan, 32 Mo. 21 (1862); 
Wright V. Hawkins, 28 Tex. 452 (1866). So it is the duty of the 
state courts to take cognisance of the United States internal rev- 
enue laws and dismiss an action invalidated by such laws, though 
the point is not relied on by the parties but is taken by the court 
sua sponte. Kessel v. Albetis, 56 Barb. 362 (1870). Where con- 
gress has conferred upon a department the power to prescribe rules 
and regulations, courts will take judicial cognisance of the latter. 
Caha V. U. S., 1.52 U. S. 211 (1893). 

Following analogous decisions, it is held that where the substance 
of the statutes of another state are incorporated in a public act of 
congress, state courts will take judicial notice of such statutes. 
Flanegin v. Washington Ins. Co., 7 Pa. St. 306 (1847). 

Domestic Public Laws. — Courts not only recognise, without 
proof, the existence of treaties and congressional laws which they 
are required to enforce ; they also recognise all public laws passed 
by the appropriate branch of any state government under which 
the court is organised. State v. Jarrett, 17 Md. 309 (1861) ; Gird- 
lestone v. O'Reilly, 21 Q. B. U. C. 409 (1862) ; Inhabitants of Spring- 
field V. Worcester, 2 Cush. 52 (1848) ; U. S. v. Fuller, 4 N. M. 368 
(1889) ; Division of Howard Co., 15 Kans. 194 (1875) ; Griswold v. 
Gallup, 22 Copn. 208 (1852) ; Parent v. Walmsly's Adm., 20 Ind. 
82 (1863) ; Evans, Auditor, v. Brown, 30 Ind. 614 (1869) ; Dolph v. 
Barney, 5 Oreg. 191 (1874); "and where one state recognises acts 
done in pursuance of the laws of another state, its courts will take 
judicial cognisance of those laws, so far as may be necessary to 
determine the validity of the acts alleged to be done in conformity 
with them." Carpenter v. Dexter, 8 Wall. 613, 531 (1869). 



21^ AMEEICAN NOTES. [PAET I. 

When the courts of one state have taken judicial cognisance of 
the laws of another they will " until it is proved that the law has 
been changed . . . presume it still exists." Graham v. Williams. 
21 La. Ann. 594 (1869). 

The courts of Canada take judicial cognisance of the acts of the 
Provincial legislature even though locally limited. Darling v. 
Hitchcock, 25 Q. B. U. C. 463 (1866); and Canadian Admiralty 
Courts are "bound to take judicial notice of an order in council from 
which the court derives its jurisdiction." Eeg. v. The Minnie, 4 
Can. Exch. 151 (1894). 

The rule requires jiidicial knowledge of such public laws of any 
state or country of which the jurisdiction formed part as were in 
use while the union continued. Cox v. Morrow, 14 Ark. 603 (1854) ; 
Arayo v. Currell, 1 La. Eep. 528, 541 (1830) ; Stokes v. Macken, 62 
Barb. 145 (1861) ; Henthorne v. Doe, 1 Blackf. 157 (1821) ; Delano v. 
Jopling, 1 Litt. 417 (1822) ; U. S. v. Eitcliie, 17 How. 525 (1854) ; 
Otto V. Soulard, 9 Mo. 573 (1845) ; Doe v. Eslava, 11 Ala. 1028 
(1847). 

It is on the same principle that American courts take cognisance 
of the common and statutory laws of England in force at the time 
of the B,evolution, — so far as suitable to the new conditions. Ocean 
Ins. Co. V. Fields, 2 Story, 59, 75 (1841). 

So the courts of a territory are required to know the public laws of 
the territory, and if the going into effect of such a law is dependent 
on lapse of time or other condition, must notice the condition and its 
being complied with at any particular time. Hoyt v. Russell, 117 
U. S. 401 (1885). The federal courts, for the same reasons, take 
judicial cognisance of the public acts of congress. 

U. g. The National Bankruptcy Act. Lathrop v. Stuart, 5 
McLean, 167 (1850). 

So courts will notice repealing laws equally with other laws. 
State V. O'Connor, 13 La. Ann. 486 (1858). 

So of the amendments to the constitution. Graves ■;;. Keaton, 3 
Cold. (Tenn.) 8 (1866). 

In general, tlie laws of a sister state must be proved as facts ; see 
post p. 521°. Hanley v. Donaghue, 116 U. S. 1 (1885). 

It is usually not difficult to recognise a public act. As a rule it 
applies to all parts of a state. 

But this is not essential. " It is a public act if it extends to all 
persons within the territorial limits described in the statute." 
Levy V. State, 6 Ind. 281 (1855). An act for the survey of a tract 
of land is special. Allegheny v. Wilson, 25 Pa. St., 332 (1865). 
But see Duren v. Houston &c. E. Co., 86 Tex. 287 (1893). The 
court will not take judicial notice of the stages of the passage of a 
public act, as set out in the legislative journals. The journals must 
be offered. But, like other public documents, " they prove their own 



CHAP. II.] AJ!i£EKICAISr NOTES. 21^" 

authenticity." Grob v. Cushman, 45 111. 419 (1867) ; Stall v. Druny, 
118 Ind. 449 (1888) ; Chesapeake «&c. Canal Co. v. Baltimore &e. 
R. E. Co., 4 Gill & J. 1, 63 (1832). 

But whether a statute "be a law or not a law, is a judicial ques- 
tion, to be settled and determined by the courts and judges. . . . 
When once it became the settled construction of the Constitution 
of Illinois that no act can be deemed a valid law, unless, by the 
journals of the legislature, it appears to have been regularly passed 
by both houses, it became the duty of the courts to take judicial 
notice of the journal entries in that regard." Town of South 
Ottawa V. Perkins, 94 U. S. 260 (1876). Courts may examine the 
original roll in Secretary's office and any other sources of infor- 
mation. Bowen v. Mo. Pac. E. E., 118 Mo. 541 (1893) ; Moog v. 
Randolph, 77 Ala. 597 (1884). 

To determine the existence of a statute or when it went into 
effect judges "have a right to resort to any source of information 
which in its nature is capable of conveying to the judicial mind a 
clear and satisfactory answer to such question, always seeking 
first for that which in its nature is most appropriate, unless the 
positive law has enacted a different rule." Gardner v. Collector, 6 
Wall. 499 (1867) ; Somers v. State (So. Dak.), 58 N. W. 804 (1894) ; 
State V. Bailey, 16 Ind. 46 (1861) ; Pierson v. Baird, 2 Greene (la.), 
235 (1849) ; Berliner v. Waterloo, 14 Wise. 378 (1861). 

Certain laws applying only to a limited portion of the state are 
considered public because they apply to all citizens of the state. 
For example, in a Massachusetts case, Parsons, C. J., speaking of 
an act for the preservation of bass in a certain river in the present 
state of Maine, says, " We are of opinion that the statute referred 
to is a public statute. It is obligatory on all the citizens, and they 
must notice it at their peril. We must, therefore, ex officio, take 
notice of it. Indeed, all the laws regulating the taking of fish are 
made for the public benefit, to preserve the fish, and are public 
statutes." Burnham v. Webster, 5 Mass. 266 (1809) ; so where an 
act forbidding any but specified persons from surveying or marking 
lumber in a certain county in Maine, and all persons from buying 
or selling lumber not so marked, was attacked as unconstitutional, 
the court say : "It is true that public acts are usually general in 
their character and operation, and equally applicable to all parts 
of the state. There are other acts which are considered as public 
acts, of which all persons are bound to take notice upon their peril, 
and yet they are local, because the violation of them is and must 
be local. . . . Nothing appears which indicates that the law was 
not intended as a public benefit, of which all the citizens of the 
state, as well as others, might equally participate." Pierce v. 
Kimball, 9 Greenl. 54 (1832). So an act authorising riparian 
proprietors of a section of Maryland to extend their ownership by 



21" AMERICAN NOTES. [PAKT I. 

improvements into public waters " operating as a grant of the 
public domain, and affecting the rights of navigation and fishery, 
by allowing improvements to be made out into navigable water," 
was said to be entitled to be "judicially noticed by the court as a 
public law.'' Hammond's Lessees v. Inloes, 4 Maryland, 138, 172, 
(1853). On a criminal charge of selling "one pint of whiskey for 
6 cents, not for mechanical or medicinal purposes," in violation of a 
statute applying to three towns in a certain county, forbidding 
sales of so small a quantity, except for these purposes, the defend- 
ant objected that the statute was not set out in the complaint. In 
overruling the objection, the court say, " Although local, it is not a 
private statute. To constitute a statute a public act, it is not 
necessary that it should extend to all parts of the state. It is a 
public act if it extend equally to all persons within the territorial 
limits described in the statute. The court was bound to notice that 
statute without pleading." Levy v. State, 6 Ind. 281 (1855). The 
same rule is applied where a general " Local option" law is passed, 
and the operation of the statute is dependent on an election. State v. 
Cooper, 101 N. C. 684 (1888). 

"There are statutes that are local in one sense which are never- 
theless public statutes ; for it is not necessary to constitute a statute 
a public act that it should be equally applicable to all parts of the 
state. It is sufficient if it extend to all persons doing or omitting 
to do an act within the territorial limits described in the statute." 
Bretz V. Mayor &c. of New York, 6 Robertson, 325 (1868), a case hold- 
ing that a statute conferring on the supreme court jurisdiction of 
actions against the corporation of New York city, was a public 
statute. So a statute creating a public office is a public statute. 
State V. Jarrett, 17 Md. 309 (1861). So a joint resolution imposing 
a duty on a public officer is a public statute and will be judicially 
recognised. State v. Delesdenier, 7 Tex. 76 (1851). The courts of 
Lower Canada take notice of acts published in the official gazette. 
Dubois V. Fanteaux, 7 Kev. Leg. 430 (1875). 

A statute changing the name of a township "is a public local 
one, of which the court takes notice." State v. Cooper, 101 N. C. 
684 (1888). 

Municipal Coepoeations. — The case last cited is an illustration 
of the general rule that, as municipal corporations are not so much 
local legal entities with certain powers as they are instrumentalities 
for carrying on the functions of government, legislative acts creat- 
ing, enlarging, or otherwise modifying such local municipalities and 
defining their powers, though necessarily of limited territorial 
application, are public acts of which the courts take judicial notice. 
Albrittin v. Huntsville, 60 Ala. 480 (1877) ; Macey v. Titcombe, 19 
Ind. 135 (1862) ; Stier v. Oskaloosa, 41 la. 353 (1875) ; Prell v. 
McDonald, 7 Kans. 426, 445 (1871); State v. Murfreesboro, 11 



CHAP, n.] AMERICAN NOTES. 21^2 

Humph. (Tenn.) 217 (1850) ; Gallagher v. State, 10 Tex. App. 469 
(1881) ; Alexander v. Milwaukee, 16 Wise. 247 (1862) ; Tauntleroy 
V. Hannibal, 1 Dill. (U. S.) 118 (1871) ; Peoples. Potter, 35 Gal. 110 
(1868) ; Jones v. Lake View, 161 111. 663 (1894) ; Briggs v. Whipple, 
7 Vt. 15, 19 (1835) ; Bituminous &c. Co. v. Fulton, 33 Pac. Eep. 
(Cal.) 1117 (1893). For this reason the charter of a village cor- 
poration is a public law. Village of Winooski v. Gokey, 49 Vt. 282 
(1877). 

As in analogous cases, a special statute of village incorporation 
which is declared in the act itself to be a public statute will be 
noticed without proof. Gormley v. Day, 114 111. 186 (1885). 

The rule applies to prior acts of incorporation since superseded. 
Swain v. Comstock, 18 Wise. 463 (1864) ; by the same or a former 
government. Payne v. .Treadwell, 16 Gal. 220, 231 (1860). 

As the court say in Prell v. McDonald, (7 Kans. 426 (1871) : " In 
chartering such corporations the state in one sense charters a portion 
of itself. Such corporations are simply instruments in the hands 
of the state, made use of for the better protection of rights, the 
administration of justice, and the enforcement of the laws." 

This judicial knowledge extends to similar acts of a former govern- 
ment of the state. " San Francisco having been constituted, by a 
public political act of the former government, a pueblo, we must take 
judicial notice of its existence, powers, and rights." Payne v. Tread- 
well, 16 Gal. 220, 231 (1860). The case is different only by being 
stronger where municipalities, e. g., towns, are created under a 
general law, " conferring uniform and general powers on each." 
Aldermen and Gouncil v. Finley, 10 Ark. 423 (1860) ; Briggs v. 
Whipple, 7 Vt. 16 (1835). Gourts take judicial notice of such incor- 
porating statutes as being public statutes. "But the fact that a 
particular village or town has availed itself of the provisions of 
these statutes, and became incorporated as they authorise, is private 
in its character, and we know of no principle of law which would 
require or auth.orise the courts to take judicial notice of it." Hard v. 
City of Decorah, 43 la. 313 (1876) ; Eousey v. Wood, 47 Mo. App. 
465 (1891). 

Eaileoads. — The existence of a general railroad law stands on 
the same footing as any other public law and is noticed as such. 
Heaston v. Cincinnati, &c. R. E., 16 Ind. 276 (1861). 

But statutes incorporating particular railroads have been held to 
be private. They are said (Ohio E. Co. v. Eidge, 6 Black. 78 (1839) 
to " operate upon particular persons and private concerns." Atchi- 
son, &c. E. E. V. Blackshire, 10 Kans. 477, 487 (1872) ; Perry v. 
New Orleans, &c. Eailroad Co., 55 Ala. 413, 426 (1876). But see 
Hall V. Brown, 58 N. H. 93 (1877) ; Caldwell v. Eichmond E. E., 89 
Ga. 550 (1892), contra. 

In Wright v. Hawkins, 28 Tex. 452 (1866), it was held that a 



21^3 AMEEICAN NOTES. [PABT I. 

land grant or reserve to aid the constructioii of a railroad is a public 
act, though, printed among the private laws. 

" lu the case of public corporations created by public laws, the 
court is officially to take notice of the corporate character." 
Winuipiseogee Lake Co. v. Young, 40 N. H. 420 (I860). 

So of other public corporations. liJ. g., the existence of the state 
bank of Arkansas need not be proved in the courts of that state. 
McKiel V. Real Estate Bank, 4 Ark. 592 (1841). So of the Bank of 
Tennessee. Shaw v. State, 3 Sneed (Tenn.), 86 (1855). 

The courts will recognise bank charters as public acts of which 
they are obliged to take judicial notice. Davis v. Bank of Fulton, 
31 Ga. 69 (1860) ; Bank of Newberry, 9 Rich. (S. C.) 495 (1855) ; 
Hays V. Northwestern Bank of Virginia, 9 Gratt. 127 (1852). 

And acts in amendment thereof. Jemison v. Planters and Mer- 
chants Bank, 17 Ala. 754 (1850). 

The rule extends to a case where an insurance company was by 
statute made a bank of discount and deposit. Gordon v. Mont- 
gomery, 19 Ind. 110 (1862). 

Statutory Modifications. — Courts may be required by statute 
to take judicial cognisance of private laws. Bixler's Adm. v. 
Parker, 3 Bush, 166 (1867). 

Speaking of such a private law, the Virginia court of appeals 
say : " The judicial notice we are to take of it, is the same with 
that which we give to laws of a general and public nature." 
Somerville v. Wimbish, 7 Gratt. 205 (1850). 

Where a public statute requires cognisance of particular facts, 
e.g. the result of local option (liquor) elections, such cognisance 
will be taken, " and since no sources of information are pointed out, 
it is incumbent on this as well as all other courts to inform itself 
by recourse to any and all sources of information." Puckett v. 
State, 71 Miss. 192 (1893) ; Thomas v. Com., 90 Va. 92 (1893). But 
see also Whitman v. State, 80 Md. 410 (1894). 

So if a statute incorporating a private corporation declares itself 
to be a public statute, the courts will take judicial cognisance of it. 
Beaty v. Lessee of Knowles, 4 Peters, 152 (1830). 

So where the statute does not require that private acts should 
be specially pleaded. Halbert v. Skyles, 1 A. K. Marsh, (Ky.) 368 
(1818) ; Hart v. Bait. & O. R. R., 6 W. Va. 336 (1873). 

Where a private statute is recognised and amended by an act 
declared to be public, courts will take judicial notice of the original 
statute. Lavalle v. People, 6 111. Ap. 157 (1880) . So an addition 
to a public act is itself public. Belmont v. Morrill, 69 Me. 314 (1879). 
The repeal of a public law is itself public. State v. O'Conner, 13 
La. Ann. 487 (1858). 

Where particular facts are established by public statutes, the 
court of course take notice of such facts ; e. g., the character of 



CHAP. n.J AMEBIC AN NOTES. 21^^ 

certain buildings as public houses under the gaming laws. Grant 
V. State, 27 S. W. 127 (Tex. 1894). 

So of the establishment of a probate court in a certain county. 
La Salle Co. v. Milligan, 143 111. 321 (1892). 

The courts of Canada take cognisance of facts published in the 
official gazette. Simms v. Quebec, &c. E. E., 22 Low. Can. Jur. 20 
(1877). 

It follows from what has been said that, except in these instances 
of legal requirement, courts do not take judicial notice of private 
statutes. Leland v. Wilkinson, 6 Peters, 317 (1832). So of the 
incorporation of private corporations. Workingmen's Bank v. Cou- 
yerse, 33 La. Ann. 963 (1881) ; Broad Street Hotel Co. v. Weaver's 
Adm. 57 Ala. 26 (1876) ; Danville &c. Plank-Eoad Co. v. State, 16 
Ind. 456 (1861); Ferdicaris v. Trenton City Bridge Co., 29 N. J. 
Law, 367 (1862). 

In cases where the statute incorporating a bank or other institu- 
tion declares itself to be a public act, that fact alone is sufficient to 
require the courts of the same jurisdiction to take judicial notice 
of it. Buell V. Warner, 33 Vt. 570 (1861). 

So of a railroad. Cincinnati, &c. E. E. v. Clifford, 113 Ind. 460, 
467 (1887) ; Hammett v. Little Eock, &c. E. E. Co., 20 Ark. 204 
(1859) ; Western &c. E. E. v. Eoberson, 61 Fed. Eep. 692 (1894). 

Or a statute may require courts to take judicial notice of village 
organisations as public acts. Doyle v. Village of Bradford, 90 111. 
416 (1878). Or of the incorporation of proprietors of lands. Beaty 
V. Lessee of Kuowler, 4 Pet. 152 (1830). 

In other cases where a statute requires courts to take judicial 
notice of an otherwise private statute it will be the court's duty to 
take such notice. Eel Eiver Draining Association v. Topp, 16 Ind. 
242 (1861). 

So courts take judicial notice of all statutes except those which 
declare themselves to be private if such is the requirement of the 
state constitution. Covington Drawbridge Co. v. Shepherd, 20 
How. 227 (1857). 

Courts do not take cognisance of other private statutes. City of 
Allegheny v. Nelson, 25 Pa. St. 332 (1855). Por example, the in- 
corporation of a turnpike by a special act. Aliter of a corporation 
under a general law. Danville, &c. Plank Ed. v. State, 16 Ind. 456 
(1861). 

So the superior judiciary of a state will not take cognisance of 
city, town, or county ordinances, or by-laws. Furman v. Mayor, &c. 
of Huntsville, 54 Ala. 263 (1875) ; Hassard v. Municipality No. 2, 7 
La. Ann. 495 (1852) ; State v. Oddle, 42 Mo. 210 (1868) ; City of 
McPherson v. Nichols, 48 Kans. 430 (1892). Garvin v. Wells, 8 la. 
286 (1859) ; Lucker v. Com., 4 Bush (Ky.) 440 (1868) ; City of 
Winona v. Burke, 23 Minn. 254 (1876) ; Mooney v. Kennett, 19 Mo. 



2V^ AMERICAN NOTES. [PAKT I. 

651 (1854) ; Shanfelter v. Baltimore, 80 Md. 483 (1894) ; City of 
St. Louis V. Roche (Mo.), 31 S. W. 915 (1895) ; Porter v. Waring, 
69 N. Y. 250 (1877). So of the regulations of a canal board. 
Palmer v. Aldridge, 16 Barb. 130 (1852). 

But it is within the reasoning by which courts take judicial 
cognisance of laws which they are constituted to enforce that the 
same municipal ordinances which must be proved before a superior 
court of judicature are recognised without proof by the courts of 
the body which passed the ordinance. State v. City of Dubuque, 
11 la. 407 (1860). 

So though the court will take judicial cognisance of the charter 
of a municipality and of its power to make by-laws, the existence 
of any particular by-laws so made must be alleged and proved. 
Case V. Mayor of Mobile, 30 Ala. 538 (1867) ; Sherrel v. Murray, 49 
Mo. App. 233 (1892). So where, by statute, a county board was au- 
thorised to prescribe by order entered on its records such animals 
as could legally run at large, if such orders exist that fact must be 
alleged and proved. In the absence of such allegation and proof, 
cases will be determined by the general rules of law, unaffected by 
the statute. Indianapolis &c. E. Co. v. Caldwell, 9 Ind. 397 (1857). 
The reason of the ru.le is partly given in Porter v. Waring, 69 N. Y. 
260 (1877), where the court say that a contrarj' rule "would open 
the door in many cases to mere conjecture, and involve an inquiry 
as to local enactments ; the time when they took effect ; the priority 
of the same, and their application to the case in litigation ; which 
it would be difficult to dispose of without proof and which are not 
properly included within the ordinary scope of judicial knowledge 
in the determination and trial of cases." 

Of course, the court, ex gratia, may look up the ordinance for 
itself, as was done in Hassard v. Municipality No. 2, 7 La. Ann. 
495 (1852) ; and it has been held that where an inferior court is re- 
quired to take cognisance of local statutes, the appellate court should 
do the same, on hearing of the appeal. Solomon v. Hughes, 24 
Kans. 211 (1880). 

The statutory permission to prove a by-law, ordinance, &c., by a 
printed copy properly authenticated does not affect the rule. City 
of Winona v. Burke, 23 Minn. 254 (1876). 

Judicial Cognisance of State Law by Federal Courts. — 
Not only do state courts take notice of the laws of the United 
States but the federal courts take cognisance of state laws. Thus, 
the circuit courts of the United States take judicial cognisance 
of the public laws of any state of the Union, when relevant to the 
issue, though such state is not within its immediate jurisdiction. 
The reason is stated by Story, J., in Owings v. Hull (9 Peters, 607, 
624 (1836)) where it was held that the circuit court of the United 
States for Maryland was bound to take judicial cognisance of the 



CHAP, n.] AitEEICAN NOTES. 21^6 

laws of Louisiana as to the possession of a notarial instrument 
executed in New Orleans. "The circuit courts of the United 
States are created by congress, not for the purpose of adminis- 
tering the local law of a single state alone, but to administer the 
laws of all the states in the Union, in cases in which they re- 
spectively apply. The judicial power conferred on the general 
government by the constitution extends to many cases arising 
under the laws of the different states. . . . That jurisprudence 
is then, iu no just sense, a foreign jurisprudence, to be proved in 
the courts of the United States, by the ordinary modes of proof 
by which the laws of a foreign country are to be established, but it is 
to be judicially taken notice of in the same manner as the laws of 
the United States are taken notice of by these courts." See also 
Elwood V. Mannigan, 104 U. S. 562 (1881); Merrill v. Dawson, Hemp- 
stead (C. Ct. of Ark.), 563 (1848); Hinde v. Vattier, 5 Pet. 398 
(1831) ; Jones v. Hays, 4 McLean, 521 (1849) ; Hanley v. Donaghue, 
116 U. S. 1 (1885). 

The rule extends to state statutes. Merchants ISTat. Bk. v. 
McGraw, 59 Fed. Eep. 972 (1894), So, following the analogy of 
the state courts, the federal courts will judicially recognise the 
law of any foreign country, establishing land titles in any state once 
part of that country. U. S. v. Turner, 11 How. 663 (1850) ; Loree 
V. Abner, 57 Fed. Eep. 159 (1893). 

In like manner, the supreme court of the United States exer- 
cising an appellate jurisdiction from the circuit courts of the 
United States takes the same judicial cognisance as to state laws 
that the circuit courts themselves do. It is accustomed "con- 
stantly to take notice of and administer the jurisprudence of all the 
states." Owiugs v. Hull, 9 Peters, 607, 624 (1835), per Story, J. 
"Needing no averment or proof." Hanley v. Donaghue, 116 U. S. 
1, 7 (1885) ; Carpenter v. Dexter, 8 Wall. 513 (1869). As is said in 
Hanley v. Donaghue {itbi supra), " whatever was matter of law in 
the court appealed from is matter of law here, and whatever was 
matter of fact in the court appealed from is matter of fact here." 
"The law of any state of the Union, whether depending upon 
statutes, or upon judicial opinions, is a matter of which the courts 
of the United States are bound to take judicial notice, without plea 
or proof." Lamar v. Micou, 114 U. S. 218 (1885). 

Where the supreme court of the United States entertains a writ 
of error to a state court of last resort it takes the same judicial 
cognisance of the public laws of the state of the court said to be in 
error that the state court itself would take, " needing no averment 
or proof." Hanley v. Donaghue, 116 U. S. 1, 7 (1885). 

Under these circumstances of a writ of error to a state court, the 
supreme court of the United States has, it will be noted, a nar- 
rower range of judicial cognisance than when sitting on appeal 



21" AJVIEEICAN NOTES. [PAET I. 

from a circuit court of the United States and "does not take 
judicial notice of the laws of another state, not proved in that 
court and made part of the record sent up, unless by the local law 
that court takes judicial notice of it." Liverpool Steam Co. v. 
Phenix Insurance Co., 129 U. S. 397, 445 (1888) ; Hanley v. 
Donaghue, 116 U. S. 1 (1885) ; Eenaud v. Abbott, 116 U. S. 277, 
285 (1886). 

"The courts of the United States take judicial notice of the 
laws and judicial decisions of the several states." Cheever v. 
Wilson, 9 Wall. 108 (1869) ; Elwood v. Flannigan, 104 U. S. 562 
(1881); Liverpool Steam Co. u. Phenix Ins. Co. 129 U. S. 397, 
(1888). 

But while it is the duty of these courts to take such cognisance, 
they may by rule or otherwise compel litigants to assist them in so 
doing, e. jr. by setting out in their briefs all statutes relied upon. 
School List. V. Ins. Co., 101 U. S. 472 (1879). 

"Pedeeal Question." — Where in a state court the provision 
of the federal constitution requiring "full faith and credit" to be 
given to the "public acts, records, and judicial proceedings" of 
another state is involved (Const. U. S. Art. IV. sec. 1, Stats. 1790, 
11), the state court will take the same judicial cognisance of the 
laws of the state the validity of whose acts is in question that it 
takes of its own laws. The reason on which this rule is based is 
succinctly stated by the supreme court of Pennsylvania in Ohio v. 
Hinchman, 27 Pa. St. 479 (1856). "A judgment of this court, 
adverse to the right arising out of the federal constitution and 
legislation, would be reviewable in the Supreme Court of the 
United States, and there the states of the confederacy are not 
regarded as foreign states, whose laws and usages must be proved, 
but as domestic institutions whose laws are to be noticed without 
pleading or proof. It would be a very imperfect and discordant 
administration for the court of original jurisdiction to adopt one 
rule of decision, while the court of final resort was governed by 
another; and hence it follows, that in questions of this sort, we 
shall take notice of the local laws of a sister state in the same 
manner the supreme court of the United States would do on a writ 
of error to our judgment." 

To same effect is Paine v. Schenectady Ins. Co., 11 E. I. 411 
(1876). 

Foreign Laws. — Judicial notice cannot be taken of foreign 
laws. Asa general rule they must be alleged and proved like other 
facts. See 2}ost p. 52". 

The highest court of a state may be required, by statute, to take 
"judicial notice of the laws and the statutes of our sister states," 
Hobbs V. Memphis & Charlestown E. Co., 9 Heisk. (Tenn.) 873 
(1872), 



CHAP, n.] AMERICAN NOTES. 21^8 

Notice is not taken even when tlie foreign law, e. g. established 
rate of interest in other states, is printed as part of the general 
statutes of a particular state. Insurance Co. of North America v. 
Forcheimer, 86 Ala. 541 (1888). 

If the foreign law is made part of the record in error before the 
supreme court of the United States it will be considered. Green 
V. Van Buskirk, 7 Wall. 139 (1868). 

Coordinate Beanches op Government. — For reasons ana- 
logous to those requiring state courts to recognise the existence 
and composition of the national government and its international 
relations, all courts recognise the existence and composition of the 
government by which they are constituted, in its executive, legis- 
lative, and judicial branches. " It is certainly true that the courts 
will judicially recognise the public officers of the state, under whose 
laws and organisation they act as the chief executive, the heads of 
departments ; judges of courts of general jurisdiction ; attorneys 
for the state, sheriffs, and we see no reason why clerks of the 
courts should not also be included." Major v. State, 2 Sneed 
(Tenn.), 11 (1854), — a case deciding that where the clerk of the 
circuit court in one county transmits papers to the circuit court 
of another county, on a charge of venue, the seal of the court is 
not essential to the authentication of the trans iuittii)g clerk, 
whose signature will be judicially noticed. Courts will not require 
proof of the signature of the governor of their state or the date 
of his election and inauguration. Wells v. Jackson Iron Mfg. 
Co., 47 N. H. 235 (1866) ; Dewees v. Colorado Co., 32 Tex. 570 
(1870); Hizer u. State, 12 Ind. 330 (1859). "The court must take 
judicial notice of the changes made in the executive department." 
Lindsey v. Atty.-Gen., 33 Miss. 508, 628 (1857). And courts will 
notice the accession of the de facto governor. State v. Williams, 
5 Wise. 308 (1856) ; and his appointment of A. as a district judge. 
De la Eosa v. State, Tex. Crim. App. (1893), 21 S. W. Eep. 192 ; and 
of the public proclamations of the governor, e. g., in calling for 
troops. Hanson v. South Scituate, 115 Mass. 336 (1874). So it has 
been held by the supreme cotu-t of Louisiana that the signatures of 
former Spanish governors of their state need not be proved. Jones 
V. Gale's Curatrix, 4 Martin, 635 (1817). 

Courts "are bound judicially to know who are the sheriffs of the 
several counties." Ingram v. State, 27 Ala. 17 (1855) ; Alexander v. 
Burnham, 18 Wise. 199 (1864) ; Thompson v. Haskell, 21 111. 215 
(1859) ; and their signatures. Wood v. Fitz, 10 Martin, 196 (1821). 
A court will take judicial notice of the civil officers of the county 
in which it holds its sittings. Thielmann v. Burg, 73 111. 293 (1874) ; 
and so of the signature of the recorder. Scott v. Jackson, 12 La. 
Ann. 640 (1857). So of the registers of the several counties of the 
state. Fancher v. De Montegre, 1 Head, 40 (1858) ; and the levee tax- 



2V^ AMEBICAN NOTES. [PAKT I. 

collector. Templeton v. Morgan, 16 La. Ann. 438 (1862) ; Wethen- 
bee V. Dunn, 32 Cal. 106 (1867). "Courts are authorised and 
required," say the supreme court of Alabama, " to take judicial 
notice of the various commissioned ofiBlcers of the state, and to 
know the extent of their authority, their official signatures, and 
their respective terms of office, — when such terms commence, and 
when they expire. The dates of these commissions are matters of 
public record in the executive department of the state government, 
being accessible to inquiry by all who may be concerned, and the 
law fixes the duration of each official term." Gary v. State, 76 Ala. 
78 (1884); Bennett v. State, 1 Mart. & Yerg. 133 (1827). The 
supreme court of California holds that " the courts will take 
judicial notice of the officers of a county and the genuineness of 
their signatures ; and when the law provides for the appointment of 
a deputy by one of these officers, courts will also judicially recog- 
nise such deputy and the genuineness of his signature." Himmel- 
mann v. Hoadley, 44 Cal. 213, 226 (1872). So the Pennsylvania 
courts take judicial notice of aldermen as public officers. Fox 
V. Com., 81* Pa. St. 511 (1875). Illinois courts take cognisance 
who are justices of the peace ; Graham v. Anderson, 42 111. 514 
(1867) ; and other civil officers, Brackett v. People, 115 111. 29 
(1886), including "justices of the various courts of record of the 
State, and of their terms of office." Vahle v. Brackenseik, 145 111. 
231 (1893). Probably Courts will not take cognisance of the 
official character of a deputy marshal. Ward v. Henry, 19 Wise. 
76 (1866). They will not recognise the official character of a 
deputy sheriff. State Bank v. Curran, 10 Ark. 142 (1849) ; Land 
V. Patteson, Minor (Ala.) 14 (1820), he not being "commissioned 
in the name of the state or required by statute to take any oath 
of office." But where a statute authorised a superintendent of 
streets to appoint deputies, the courts of California " judicially 
recognise such deputy and the genuineness of his signature." Him- 
melmann v. Hoadley, 44 Cal. 213 (1872). A deputy auditor general, 
" being a state officer known to the law," will be judically recog- 
nised. People V. Johr, 22 Mich. 461 (1871). 

Where the terms of all justices of the peace by law expire on a 
certain day the court will take notice of that fact. Stubbs v. State, 
53 Miss. 437 (1876). 

So the courts of Indiana " take notice, as matter of law, that the 
trustee of a civil township is also trustee of the school township. 
Inglis V. Hughes, 61 Ind. 212 (1878). 

Such cognisance includes knowledge of the general elections at 
which such officers are voted for. State v. Minnick, 15 la. 123 
(1863) ; Ellis v. Eeddin, 12 Kans. 306 (1873). The reason is prob- 
ably that given in Davis v. Best, 2 la. 96 (1853). " The August 
election is established by law, and the time it is held should be 



CHAP. n.J AMERICAN NOTES. 21^0 

judicially taten notice of." See also Burnett v. Henderson, 21 
Tex. 688 (1858) ; Lewis v. Supervisors, 70 111. 65 (1873). 

Of these requirements of judicial knowledge, the supreme court 
of Alabama say (Gordon v. Tweedy, 74 Ala. 237 (1883) : " This cognis- 
ance may often extend far beyond the actual knowledge, or even the 
memory of judges, who may therefore resort to such documents of 
reference, or other authoritative sources of information as may be at 
hand, and may be deemed worthy of confidence." The court will 
not take cognisance of who are town constables. The fact is not " of 
publick notoriety." Doe v. Blackman, 1 D. Chipman (Vt.) 109 (1797). 

Statutokt Gbogkaphy. — Courts are required to take judicial 
notice of geographical or administrative subdivisions of the 
sovereignty by which they are constituted. Vanderwerker v. People, 
6 Wend. 630 (1830); McDonald v. DeCairl, 1 Chan. Cham. 34 
(1859) ; State v. Powers, 25 Conn. 48 (1866) ; State v. Wagner, 
61 Me. 178 (1873); Com. v. Desmond, 103 Mass. 445 (1869); 
Winnipiseogee Lake Co. v. Young, 40 K H. 420 (1860) ; U. S. 
V. Beebe, 2 Dak. 292 (1880) ; Smitha v. Flournoy's Adm., 47 Ala. 
345 (1872) ; Martin v. Martin, 61 Me. 366 (1863) ; Chesapeake fee- 
Canal Co. V. Baltimore &c. E. R. Co., 4 Gill & J. 1, 63 (1832) 5 
Boston V. State, 5 Tex. App. 383 ; Woodward v. Chicago &c. E. E., 
21 Wise. 309 (1867). 

"Courts take notice of the local divisions of the state, as into 
counties, cities, towns, &c., and of the relative position thereof, but 
not 'of the precise boundaries and distances. And they are not 
bound to take judicial notice of the local situation and distances of 
the different places in counties from each other." Goodwin v. 
Appleton, 22 Me. 463 (1843) ; Doyle v. Village of Bradford, 90 111. 
416 (1878) ; Boston v. State, 6 Tex. App. 383 (1879) ; Gooding v. 
Morgan, 70 111. 275 (1873) ; Martin v. Martin, 51 Me. 366 (1863). 
But the supreme court of Ehode Island, without citation of authori- 
ties, hold that "the courts are bound to take cognisance of the 
boundaries in fact claimed by the state." State v. Dunwell, 5 R. I. 
127 (1856) ; and that of Iowa judicially knows that Race Island 
is in the jurisdiction of the adjoining state of Illinois. Gilbert v. 
Moline Water Power & M'f'g Co., 19 la. 319 (1865). So of the popu- 
lation of a county according to the United States census, if the 
legislature has classified counties on this basis. Worcester JSTat. 
Bank v. Cheney, 94 111. 430 (1880) ; State v. Marion Co. Ct. (Mo.), 
31 S. W. 23 (1896). Judicial notice is taken of population as fixed 
by the census. Hawkins v. Thomas, 3 Ind. App. 399 (1891). So a 
territorial court is required to take cognisance of the limits and 
relative distances of the territory. Hoyt v. Russell, 107 U. S. 401 
(1886). So far as the limits of county jurisdiction depend upon 
the construction of records, "it is purely a question of law for the 
court." State v. Wagner, 61 Me. 178 (1873). 



2121 AMERICAN NOTES. [PAKT I. 

Where a statute declared certain houses to be public, the court 
will "recognise such houses to be public places." Graham v. 
Williams, 27 S. W. Rep. 127 (1894), (Grim. Ct. Appeals of Tex.). 
" Judicial knowledge of the location of towns is limited to such 
places as are recognised by general statutes." Field v. State (Tex.), 
24 S. W. Eep. 407 (1893) ; Pennsylvania Co. v. Horton, 132 Ind. 
189 (1892). The public political act may be one by a former govern- 
ment, establishing the municipality. Payne v. Treadwell, 16 Cal. 
220 (1860). 

Courts are not required to know that a place is within a particular 
county. Boston v. State, 5 Tex. App. 383 (1879) ; Cain v. State, 
(Tex.) 25 S. W. Rep. 1119 (1894). But see Gooding v. Morgan, 
70 111. 276 (1873) ; Kidder v. Blaisdell, 45 Me. 461 (1858) ; Com. 
V. Wheeler, 162 Mass. 429 (1894). 

But they may do so if they see fit. " The court can take judicial 
notice of the lines of counties and the towns embraced in them." 
Steinmetz v. Versailles Turnpike Co., 57 Ind. 457 (1877) ; Ham v. 
Ham, 39 Me. 263 (1855) ; State v. Powers, 25 Conn. 48 (1856) ; 
Smitha v. Flournoy's Adm., 47 Ala. 345 (1872); Lewis v. State, 
24 S. W. (Tex.) 903 (1894) ; and also that it is a railroad termi- 
nus and has a post office. Central &c. Co. v. Gamble, 77 Ga. 584 
(1886). 

Where the location of a place is referred to in public statutes the 
location must be recognised without proof. Solyer v. Romanet, 
52 Tex. 662 (1880) ; Martin v. Martin, 51 Me. 366 (1863) ; People 
V. Etting, 99 Cal. 577 (1893) ; People v. Curley, 99 Mich. 238 (1894). 
So of the distance of a town from the county seat. Bruson v. Clark, 
151 111. 495 (1894). See also State v. Pennington, 124 Mo. 388 
(1894). Courts of California will take cognisance that there is only 
one city of 100,000 population in the state. In re Constitutionality 
of Senate Bill 293, 39 Pac. Rep. 522 (1895). In an Alabama case, 
King V. Kent's Heirs, 29 Ala. 542 (1857), the court state that as a 
certain town is mentioned in the state constitution as the capitol 
and in other public acts, they are " bound " to know that it is in 
Alabama, and also that as an act of congress establishes a land 
office there and it "has long been notoriously known and recog- 
nised " as a land office, they "are authorised" to take notice of the 
same fact. 

In a later Alabama case, the court take the same view. " The 
public acts apprise us that Mobile is a municipal corporation of 
Alabama and where it is situated." Alabama &c. Ins. Co. v. Cobb, 
57 Ala. 547 (1877). See also to same effect, Houlton v. Chic. &c. 
R. R., 86 Wise. 59 (1893). So a court will take notice of Indian 
reservations within their jurisdiction, and of the laws and procla- 
mations establishing or regulating them. U. S. v. Beebe, 2 Dak. 
292 (1880). 



CHAP, n.] AMEEICAI^ KOTES. 2122 

And that the Indian Territory is beyond the jurisdiction of 
Texas. Conner v. State, 23 Tex. App. 378 (1887). 

For the same reasons, in many of the western states of the 
Union where political subdivisions, as well as the foundation of land 
titles, rest on government patents based on official surveys, the 
existence and location of the lines of such survey are among the 
facts of which courts are required to take cognisance. Mossman 
V. Forrest, 27 Ind. 233 (1866) ; Desire v. Burleson, 35 Neb. 238 
(1892) ; Atwater v. Schenck, 9 Wise. 160 (1859) ; Quinn v. Cham- 
pagne, 38 Minn. 322 (1888) ; Wright v. Phillips, 2 Greene (la.) 191 
(1849); Gooding v. Morgan, 70 111. 275 (1873); Gardner v. Eber- 
hart, 82 111. 316 (1876) ; Murphy v. Hendricks, 57 Ind. 693 (1877) ; 
Money v. Turnipseed, 50 Ala. 499 (1874) ; Muse v. Eichards, 
70 Miss. 581 (1893). So of the relation of a certain town to a prin- 
cipal meridian will be noticed. O'Brien v. Krockinski, 50 111. App. 
456 (1893). The United States supreme court say : " It is a 
matter of which this court will take judicial notice, that, by law, 
the country is divided into collective districts for internal revenue 
purposes, and in some states there are several of these districts 
with defined geographical boundaries." U. S. v. Jackson, 104 U. S. 
41 (1881). 

As to proof of these lines, as matters of public and general 
interest, as an exception to the rule against hearsay, see post, p. 412\ 

EuLES OF Pkacticb. — Courts take cognisance of the rules of 
practice established in their own courts. 

" And of the times when and the places where its sessions ap- 
pointed by law are to be held." Kidder v. Blaisdell, 45 Me. 461 (1858) ; 
Lindsay v. Williams, 17 Ala. 229 (1860) ; Eoss v. Austill, 2 Cal. 183 
(1852). " Judicial notice is taken of the number of days the court is 
in session at each term." Fabyan v. Eussell, 38 N. H. 84 (1859) ; 
Durre v. Brown, 7 Ind. App. 127 (1893). 

But see Gilliland v. Sellers, 2 Oh. St. 223 (1853), contra. 

"This court judicially knows that the fall term of the circuit 
court of Lowndes County begins on the fourth Monday in October 
in each year, and may continue three weeks ; and that November 6th, 
1873, was a day of the second week of said term." Eodgers v. State, 
50 Ala. 102 (1874). To same effect, Spencer v. Curtis, 67 Ind. 221 
(1877) ; Davidson v. Peticolas, 34 Tex. 27 (1870) ; Lewis v. Wintrode, 
76 Ind. 13 (1881). 

Courts will not take notice of the rules established by inferior 
tribunals. Cutter v. Caruthers, 48 Cal. 178 (1874) ; Cherry v. Baker, 
17 Md. 75 (1860). Or of their adjournments. Baker v. Knott, 
Supreme Court of Idaho, 35 Pac. Eep. 172 (1893). 

Courts are required to take judicial cognisance of their own records 
in a prior stage of the same case. Dawson v. Dawson, 29 Mo. App. 
521(1888); Searlesv. Knapp, (So.Dak.) 68N". W. 807 (1894) ; State 



21^^ AMERICAN NOTES. [PAET I. 

V. Ulrich, 110 Mo. 350 (1892) ; State v. Bowen, 16 Kans. 475 (1876); 
Pagett V. Curtis, 15 La. Ann. 451 (1860) ; Hollenbacli v. Schnabel, 
101 Cal. 312 (1894) ; Yell v. Lane, 41 Ark. 63 (1883) ; Secrist v. 
Petty, 109 111. 188 (1883) ; State v. Schilling, 14 la. 455 (1862) ; 
Leavitt v. Cutler, 37 Wise. 46 (1875). Even in a case where the 
proceedings against the garnishee and the principal defendant were 
" virtually a portion of the same record." Farrar v. Bates, 55 Tex. 
193 (1881) ; Kenosha Stove Co. v. Shedd, 82 la. 640 (1891). 

But courts are not required to take judicial cognisance of their 
own records in other cases. National Bank of Monticello v. Bryant, 

13 Bush (Ky.), 419 (1877) ; Grace v. Ballou, 4 So. Dak. 333 (1893) ; 
McCormick v. Herndon, 67 Wise. 648 (1887). See also, In re Man- 
derson, 51 Fed. Eep. 50 (1892). 

Indeed a California case, speaking of another pending petition 
against the defendant in the case at bar, go so far as to say : " We 
apprehend that the court could not under any circumstances take 
judicial notice of the fact, except it were for mere calendar purposes." 
Lake Merced Water Co. v. Cowles, 31 Cal. 215 (1866). 

So an affidavit in another case cannot be judicially noticed by the 
judge, though admissible in evidence if offered and the judge, in 
point of fact, personally remembers the affidavit. Baker v. Mygalt, 

14 la. 131 (1862). 

In the same way, a court cannot take judicial notice of the con- 
nection existing between two cases on its docket. Banks v. Burnam, 
61 Mo. 76 (1875). 

" But the courts of one state cannot judicially take notice of the 
laws and practice of another." Newell v. Newton, 10 Pick. 470 (1830). 

Courts will take judicial notice who were its members at a par- 
ticular time and "the term fixed by law for the commencement of 
its sessions." Gilliland v. Sellers, 2 Oh. St. 223 (1853). 

And courts will take notice who are their officers. Central 
Land Co. &c. v. Calhoun, 16 W. Va. 361 (1880) ; Montjoy v. State, 
78 Ind. 172 (1881) ; Norvell v. McHenry, 1 Mich. 227 (1849) ; Dyer 
V. Last, 51 111. 179 (1869). And of their signatures. Buell v. State, 
72 111. 523 (1880). 

Whether courts are required to take official notice of the personnel 
of inferior courts is in dispute. « The court are bound to take notice 
of all public acts and laws, without doubt ; but whether they must 
know who are the justices or the chief justices of inferior tribunals 
certainly admits of question." Kipley v. Warren, 2 Pick. 692 (1824). 

In Davis v. McEnany, 150 Mass. 451 (1890) the supreme judicial 
court of Massachusetts declined to take judicial cognisance of the 
clerk of a police court, deciding that the record itself should show 
his official character. 

On the contrary, the Kentucky court of appeals recognises who 
are judges of the circuit courts of that state. Kennedy v. Com., 78 



CHAP, n.] AMERICAN NOTES. 212* 

Ky. 447 (1880). So the Illinois court of appeals. Eussell v. Sargent, 
7 111. App. 98 (1880). The supreme court of Pennsylvania, after 
some review of the authorities, are "disposed to take judicial 
notice " of the constitution of an inferior court. They treat the 
question as one of optional cognisance. "The rule," they say, "is 
that courts will take notice of what ought to be generally known 
within the limits of their jurisdiction. There seems to us to be as 
much reason for our having knowledge of who are in fact the judges 
of our constitutional courts, as for our having judicial knowledge of 
the heads of departments, sheriffs, etc., knowledge of whom is always 
presumed." Kilpatrick v. Com., 31 Pa. St. 198 (1858) ; Cincinnati, 
&c. K. E. V. Grames, 8 Ind. App. 112 (1893). But see County of San 
Joaquin v. Budd, 96 Cal. 47 (1892). 

Courts when required to take cognisance of facts which they do 
not actually know are constrained to, resort to any appropriate 
source of information. " Information to guide their judgment may 
be obtained by resort to original documents in the public archives 
or to books of history or science or to any other proper source." 
Hoyt V. Russell, 117 U. S. 401 (1885) ; Gonzales v. Boss, 120 U. S. 
605 (1886). 

The Maryland courts " take judicial notice of the tribunals created 
by the constitution." Tucker v. State, 11 Md. 322 (1857). 

In Louisiana, courts recognise the signature of all justices legally 
appointed by the governor. Despau v. Swindler, 3 Martin, n. s. 
705 (1825). ' 

This is in accordance with the general rule prevailing in that state : 
" We have more than once held that we would not require evidence 
of the of&cial capacity of functionaries commissioned in this state, 
and would take notice of the oflSces held by them." Follain v. 
Lefevre, 3 Robinson, 13 (1842). So, in that state, when court offi- 
cers take a bond in pursuance of law and file the same in court, no 
proof is needed of the officer's signature. Wood v. Fitz, 10 Martin, 
196 (1821). 

And so the supreme court of Alabama takes judicial notice of the 
resignation of a circuit judge, though without assigning any reason 
for their decision. Ux parte Peterson, 33 Ala. 74 (1858). 

The Illinois courts take judicial notice who are the justices of 
the peace in their respective counties. Graham v. Anderson, 42 111. 
514 (1867). Also who are the judges of inferior courts. Vahle v. 
Brackenseik, 145 111. 231 (1893) ; also the date of their ceasing to 
hold the office. People v. McConnell, 155 111. 192 (1895). 

The Kings Bench of Lower Canada holds that courts will notice 
the appointment of one of their officers to be judge of another court. 
Fay V. Miville, 2 Rev. de Legis. 333 (1816). Notice will be taken 
of the jurisdiction of an inferior court as regulated by statute. 
Nelson v. Ladd, 4 So. Dak. 1 (1893). 



2125 AMERICAN NOTES. [PART I. 

Language. — Courts take judicial cognisance of the ordinary- 
meaning of words in the vernacular. Probably they are required so 
to do. Com. V. Kneeland, 20 Pick. 206, 241 (1838) (" blasphemy ") ; 
Hill V. Bacon, 43 111. 477 (1867) ; Adler v. State, 55 Ala. 16 (1876) 
("malt liquor"); Shubrick u State, 2 S. C. 21 (1870) ("sow"); 
State V. Abbott, 20 Vt. 537 (1848) (" steer "). 

" We take judicial notice of the true significance of all English 
words and phrases, and may resort for aid to any appropriate books 
of reference." Grennan v. McGregor, 78 Cal. 258 (1889). 

The court may decline to hear evidence concerning the signifi- 
cance of words, the meaning of which it judicially knows ; e. g. in 
a Massachusetts case, on trial of a complaint for violation of the 
Sunday law by keeping open a tobacconist's store, the defendant 
claimed that he was lawfully selling " drugs and medicines," and 
offered evidence of experts to show that tobacco and cigars had 
" a medicinal effect on the human system." The presiding justice 
excluded the evidence, and an exception to this ruling was over- 
ruled. "The court has judicial knowledge of the meaning of com- 
mon words, and may well rule that guns and pistols are not drugs 
or medicines, and may exclude the opinions of witnesses who offer 
to testify that they are." Com. «. Marzynski, 149 Mass. 68 (1889). 
See also Matthews v. Park, 159 Pa. St. 579 (1894). 

The court may not only refresh its memory by reference to dic- 
tionaries, etc., but may permit standard authorities, e. g., Webster's 
Unabridged Dictionary, to be read to the jury for its definition of a 
disputed word. Adler v. State, 55 Ala. 16 (1876). 

The court must study out the meaning of terms ; e. g. " Congre- 
gational." Atty.-Gen. v. Dublin, 38 N. H. 459 (1859). But may re- 
quire aid from the parties. School Dist. v. Ins. Co., 101 U. S. 472 
(1879). And use the testimony of experts. Atty.-Gen. v. Dublin, 
ubi supra. 

In a New York case, the court without proof rendered judgment 
for the dollar value of a number of English " pounds." Johnston v. 
Hedden, 2 Johns. Cases, 274 (1801). 

Whether courts will notice customary abbreviations is more in 
dispute. Apparently, this species of knowledge is more nearly 
■analogous to those where cognisance is optional with the court, ■/. e., 
dependent upon the knowledge or feeling of the particular judge. 
In an Alabama case the court say it " must judicially take notice of 
such abbreviations as ' Adm'r.' or acknowledge itself incompetent to 
understand the commonest writings." Moseley's Adm'r v. Mastin, 
37 Ala. 216 (1861). So the usual abbreviations of proper names 
will be noticed. Stephen v. State, 11 Ga. 225, 240 (1852) (" Jas.") ; 
Weaver v. McElhenor, 13 Mo. 89 (1850) ("Christy"); Sparks ■»;. 
Sparks, 51 Kans. 195 (1893) ("Dan"); Studsill «. State, 7 Ga. 2, 
(1849) (" Thos."). 



CHAP, n.] AMBEICAISr NOTES. 212S 

On the other hand, the supreme court of Texas was unable judi- 
cially to know that " St. Louis, Mo. " meant St. Louis in the state 
of Missouri. Ellis v. Park, 8 Tex. 205 (1852) ; or that "New Or- 
leans, La." meant New Orleans in the state of Louisiana. Eussell 
V. Martin, 15 Tex. 238 (1855). Apparently these two cases rest on 
an erroneous application of a prior case in the same court, Andrews 
V. Hoxie, 5 Tex. 171 (1849), where the court decide that they cannot 
judicially know that "The city of New Orleans," without more, 
means the city of that name in Louisiana. This apparently is cor- 
rect. Most people in the United States know that there is a city 
of New Orleans in Louisiana. Whether there are other cities of 
the same name elsewhere is not, perhaps, so generally known as to 
dispense with proof. 

Slang and phrases of peculiar or local usage must be proved. In 
the case of Mayor &c. of Baltimore v. State, 56 Md. 376, 468 (1859), 
where the legislature of Maryland had assumed control of the police 
force of Baltimore by the appointment of commissioners under a 
statute, providing "that no Black Eepublican or endorser or ap- 
prover of. the Helper Book" should be appointed to any oiBce 
under the board, the court say : " We cannot understand, officially, 
who are meant to be affected by the proviso, and, therefore, cannot 
express a judicial opinion on the question." 

But the court will take judicial notice of the phrase " gift enter- 
prise" as used in a criminal statute. Lohman v. State, 81 Ind. 
15 (1881). 

And officially notice the meaning of the initials C. 0. D. State v. 
Intox. Liquors, 73 Me. 278 (1882). But, on the contrary, the Mis- 
souri court of appeals " do not know that the meaning of the abbre- 
viation ' C. 0. D.' as used by expressmen, is sufficiently a matter 
of common knowledge that the circuit court could take judicial 
notice of it," and hold that its meaning is a question for the jury. 
McNichol V. Pacific Express Co., 12 Mo. App. 401 (1882). Courts 
will notice surveyor's initials, not pretending " to be more ignorant 
than the rest of mankind." Kile v. Yellowhead, 80 111. 208 (1875). 
But the courts of Minnesota refuse to take cognisance of the mean- 
ing of " S^ N. E.* and N. W.* S. E.^ " Keith v. Hayden, 26 Minn. 
212 (1879). To the same effect. Power v. Bowdle, 3 No. Dak. 107 
(1893). 

So a foreign language must be proved ; e. g., in a case where 
defendant was convicted of rape upon a woman named " Kurkwiski," 
and there was evidence that her name was written Kurkowiski, 
the court refused a motion in arrest of judgment, which was 
approved on report to the upper court. " There is no evidence 
tending to show that, though pronounced Kurkowiski, it was not 
properly spelled Kurkwiski. The courts of this state cannot take 
judicial cognisance of the proper orthography or pronunciation of 



2V AMERICAN NOTES. [PART I. 

names in the Polish language." State v. Johnson, 26 Minn. 316 
(1879). 

CiECULATiNG Medium, etc. — The court and jury will take 
notice, without proof, of the legal coins made at the mint of the 
United States, pursuant to law and of foreign coins made current 
by law. U. S. v. Burns, 5 McLean, 23 (1849) ; also of what is legal 
tender. Chesapeake Bank v. Swain, 29 Md. 483, 502 (1868) ; Daily 
V. State, 10 Ind. 536 (1858). Also that United Sta