Skip to main content

Full text of "Zoroaster : the prophet of ancient Iran"

See other formats





AJUUh : ■:::^.l.ipq.'f.. 

131 Hcirir'^PItl®" "Jniversity Library 
DL 1o5b.J13 

^°'°nnmliA ,SI'.?.P!}SL°LmmX Jran / 

3 1924 022 982 502 

Cornell University 

The original of this book is in 
the Cornell University Library. 

There are no known copyright restrictions in 
the United States on the use of the text. 










KTefa gorft 




All rights reserved 

Copyright, 1898, 

bt the macmillan company. 

J. S. Gushing k Co. — Berwick & Smith 
Norwood Mass. U.S.A. 




This work deals with the life and legend of Zoroaster, the 
Prophet of Ancient Iran, the representative and type of the 
laws of the Medes and Persians, the Master whose teaching 
the Parsis to-day still faithfully follow. It is a biographical 
study based on tradition ; tradition is a phase of history, and it 
is the purpose of the volume to present the picture of Zoroaster 
as far as possible in its historic light. 

The suggestion which first inspired me to deal with this 
special theme came from my friend and teacher. Professor 
Geldner of Berlin, at the time when I was a student under 
him, ten years ago, at the University of Halle in Germany, and 
when he was lecturing for the term upon the life and teachings 
of Zoroaster. It was from him that I received my earliest 
vivid impression of the historic reality of the Ancient Sage. 
The special material for the work, however, has grown out of 
my own lectures, delivered several times in the regular uni- 
versity curriculum of Columbia. Students who may have 
attended the course will perhaps recognize some of the ideas 
as discussed with them in the class. As I have had the prepa- 
ration of this volume in view for some time, I have naturally 
been constantly adding to my material or collecting new facts 
to throw light on the subject. It is the aim of the book to 
bring together all that is generally known at the present time, 
either from history or from tradition, about this religious 
teacher of the East. 

Our knowledge of Zoroaster has been greatly augmented 
from the traditional side, during the past few years, especially 
through the translations made by Dr. West from the Pahlavi 
texts. This mass of Zoroastrian patristic literature tends 


largely to substantiate much that was formerly regarded as 
somewhat legendary or uncertain. This has resulted in plac- 
ing actual tradition on a much firmer basis and in making 
Zoroaster seem a more real and living personage. It is the 
object of the book to bring out into bolder relief historically 
the figure of this religious leader. In emphasizing more 
especially the reality of the great Master's life instead of 
elaborating the more mythical views of Zarathushtra which 
prevailed not so long ago, I may, in the judgment of some, 
have gone too far on the side of realism. But if I have done 
so, it seems to me that this is a fault at least in the right 
direction if we may forecast the future from the present. I 
can but feel that the old writers, like Anquetil du Perron, 
were nearer the truth in certain of their views of Zoroaster, 
than has sometimes been supposed. In taking a position so 
much in accord with tradition with regard to Zarathushtra I 
might adopt the plea which the old Armenian annalist, Moses of 
Khorene, employs in another connection : ' there may be much 
that is untrue in these stories, there may be much that is 
true ; but to me, at least, they seem to contain truth. ' I may 
only add that in general where there is so much smoke there 
must also be fire, and in the book I hope that others may 
discern some sparks of the true flame amid the cloud. 

As to the arrangement of material and the form of the work, 
I have sought to make the first half of the volume more general; 
the second half I have allowed to be more technical. The story 
of the life and ministry of the Prophet is told in twelve chap- 
ters ; the more critical discussion of mooted points is reserved 
for the Appendixes. The general reader may also omit all notes 
at the bottom of the pages. 

In respect to the spelling of proper names the plan has gener- 
ally been, in the case of Zoroaster, to employ Zarathushtra, 
Zaratusht, or Zardusht, respectively, if it seemed necessary at 
any point to indicate the special sources from which I was 
drawing or to distinguish between Avestan, Pahlavi, and Modern 


Persian. I have otherwise called the Prophet by his more 
familiar name of Zoroaster. The same holds true of his patron 
Vishtaspa, Vishtasp, Gushtasp, and of other ancient names. 
I have furthermore aimed at giving authority for all statements 
that I have made, as the abundant references to the original 
sources and the citations will show. 

With regard to indebtedness, I have always tried to give 
credit to my predecessors and fellow-workers in the field ; a 
glance at the footnotes, I think, will prove this. Each of those 
to whom I am under obligation will best recognize my in- 
debtedness, and win best be aware of my appreciation. I 
should like to have referred also to Professor Tiele's latest 
book, which deals with the religion of Iran, because some 
twenty of its interesting pages are devoted to Zarathushtra ; 
it arrived after my work was all printed, so I have been able 
only to add the title in my bibliographical list on p. xv, and 
to draw attention to the points which are of importance in 
connection with the ptresent subject. Furthermore, in various 
parts of my volume I have made acknowledgment to several 
friends for kind aid which they have readily given on special 
points, and which I shall gratefully remember. 

I now wish to express to the Trustees of the Columbia 
University Press my appreciation of their encouragement 
given to me to carry out the work ; and I desire especially 
to thank President Seth Low for the personal interest he 
has taken in the book from the beginning, and to acknow- 
ledge the kind helpfulness of Dean Nicholas Murray Butler 
in aU matters of detail. The Macmillan Company, likewise, 
have been constantly ready to meet my wishes in every re- 
gard; and I owe my thanks also to the printing firm of 
Messrs. Gushing and Company, to their compositors and 
their proof-readers, for their careful and prompt despatch of 
the work. 

But beside these acknowledgments there remain two friends 
to mention, who come in for a large share of remembrance. 


These are my two pupils, Mr. Louis H. Gray, Fellow in Indo- 
Iranian Languages in Columbia University, and Mr. Mont- 
gomery Schuyler, Jr., a member of the class of 1899 in the 
College, who has been studying Sanskrit and Avestan for 
the last two years. Since the first proof-sheets arrived, these 
two generous helpers have been unflagging in their zeal and 
willingness to contribute, in any way that they could, to giv- 
ing accuracy to the book. Mr. Gray's indefatigable labor and 
scholarly acumen are especially to be seen in Appendix V., the 
completeness of which is due to his untiring readiness to pur- 
sue the search farther for texts that might hitherto have 
escaped notice ; and to Mr. Schuyler's hand is owed many a 
happy suggestion that otherwise would have been lacking in 
the book, and more than one correction that without his aid 
might have been overlooked. To both of these scholars I wish 
to express my thanks; and I feel that they also will recall 
with pleasure the happy hours spent together in work as 
chapter after chapter came from the printer's hand. Forsan 
et haeq olim meminisse juvabit. 

And now I send the book forth, hoping that in some meas- 
ure it may contribute to a more general knowledge of this Sage 
of the Past, the Persian Prophet of old, the forerunner of 
those Wise Men of the East who came and bowed before the 
majesty of the new-born Light of the World. 


Columbia Univbbsitt, 

IN THE City of New York, 

October, 1898. 


[The other books which have been referred to are given with their titles as occasion 
arises to quote from them or to refer to them. The present list is therefore 
very abridged.] 

Anquetil du Perron. Zend-Avesta, Ouvrage de Zoroaatre. Tome I. 1, 2 et 
Tome n. Paris, 1771. 

' Vie de Zoroastre ' (i. Part 2, pp. 1-70) ; very important. German translation 
by Kleuker, Zend-Avesta, Thl. 3, pp. 1-48 ; excerpts in English by K. E. Kanga. 
Bombay, 1876. 

Avesta. The Sacred Books of the Parsis. Edited by Karl F. Geldner. 
Stuttgart, 1885-1896. 

All Avestan references are made to this edition except in the case of Yashts 
22-24, for which Westergaard's edition was used. The Fragments are found in 
Darmesteter, Le Zend-Avesta, iii, 1-166. 

Ayuso, F. G. Los Pueblos Iranios y Zoroastro. Madrid, 1874. 

This volume of studies shows sympathy for tradition. Z. born in the^est 
(p. 7) ; h^Ldate is_2la£edjnJhe_Vedic_Per {p, 14, cf. pp. 147- 

149), but confused by tra ditio n with anotherZ. who lived about Bx^600j[p. 15). 

Brisson, Barnab6. Barnabae Brissonii, De Eegio Persarum Principatu Libri 
Tres. Argentorati, 1710 (orig. ed. 1590). 

Consult especially the full indexes at the end of the edition. 

Dabistan. The Dabistan, or School of Manners. Translated from the Origi- 
nal Persian. By Shea and Troyer. 3 vols. Paris, 1843. 

Darab Dastur Peshotan Sanjana. Geiger's Civilization of the Eastern Iranians 
in Ancient Times. Translated from the German. (Ostiranische Kultur.) 
2 vols. London, 1885-1886. 

Contains also a translation of Spiegel's Essay on Gushtasp and Zoroaster 
(from Eranische Alterthumskunde) . 


Zarathushtra in the Gathas and in the Greek and Roman classics. 

Translated from the German of Drs. Geiger and Windischmann, with 
Notes and an Appendix. Leipzig, 1897. 

See also Windischmann and Geiger. 

Darmesteter, James. The Zend Avesta. Translated. Sacred Books of the 
East, vols, iv., xxiii. Oxford, 1880, 1883, and vol. iv. in second ed., 

Darmesteter, J. Le Zend Avesta, Traduction nouvelle avec Commentaire 
historique et philologique. 3 vols. Paris, 1892-1893. (Annales du 
Musee Guimet, xxi., xxii., xxiv.) 

This valuable work has been constantly consulted on points relating to the 


Dasatir. The Desatir, or Sacred Writings of the Ancient Persian Prophets 
in the Original Tongue; together with the Ancient Persian Version 
and Commentary of the Fifth Sasan. Published by Mulla Firuz Bin 
Kaus. An English translation. 2 vols. Bombay, 1818. 

Dosabhai Framji Karaka. History of the Parsis. 2 vols. London, 1884. 

Especially vol. 2, chap. 2, pp. 146-164. 

Duncker, M. History of Antiquity. English translation by E. Abbott. 
Vol. 5. London, 1881. 

Firdausi. See Shah Namah. 

Geiger, Wilhelm. Das Yatkar-i Zariran und sein Verhaltnis zum Sah-name. 
Sitzb. der philos. philol. und histor. CI. d. k. bayer. Ak. d. Wiss., 1890. 
Bd. ii. Heft 1, pp. 43-84. Munchen, 1890. 

Ostiranische Kultur im Altertum. Erlangen, 1882. 

English transl. by Darab D. P. Sanjana. See above. 

Geiger. Zarathushtra in den Gathas. A Discourse. Translated by Darab 
D. P. Sanjana. 
See above. 

Geldner, K. F. Article 'Zoroaster.' Encydopcedia Britannica, xxiv., 820-823 
(9th ed.), 1888. Also forthcoming article, 'Persian Religion,' in 
Bncyclopcedia Biblica, ed. Cheyne and Black (read in manuscript). 

Gottheil, R. J. H. References to Zoroaster in Syriac and Arabic Literature. 
In Classical Studies in Honour of Henry Drisler, New York, 1894. 
pp. 24-51 (Columbia University Press). 
Very useful and constantly referred to. 

Gnindriss der iranischen Philologie. Hrsg. von W. Geiger und E. Kuhn. 
Strassburg, 1896—. 


Harlez, C. de. Avesta, Livre Sacre du Zoroastrisme. Traduit du Texts 
Zend. 2'^' 6i. Paris, 1881. 

Valuable Introduction; Chap. II., pp. xviil.-xxxii., 'Zoroastre.' 

Haug, M. Essays on the Parsis. Third ed. Edited and enlarged by 
E. W. West. London, 1884. 

Especially Essay IV. 

Holty, A. Zoroaster und seiu Zeitalter. LUneburg, 1836. 

Horn, P. Die Eeiche der Meder und Perser. (Geschichte und Kultur. Die 
Religion Zoroaster's.) Hellwalds Kulturgeschichte. 4 Auflage, Bd. L 
301-332. 1897. 

Hovelacque, A. L' Avesta, Zoroastre et le Mazd^isme. Paris, 1880. 

Sketch of Zoroaster, pp. 134-149. 

Hyde, T. Historia Keligionis veterum Persarum eorumque Magorum. 
Oxon. 1700. 

A fund of information. Citations after this first edition. 

Justi, Ferd. Die alteste iranische Religion und ihr Stifter Zarathustra. In 
Preussische Jahrbucher. Bd. 88, pp. 55-86, 231-262. Berlin, 1897. 

Handbuch der Zendsprache. Leipzig, 1864. 

Iranisches Namenbuch. Marburg, 1895. 

Consulted on all proper names. 

Kanga, Kavasji Edalji. Extracts from Anquetil du Perron's Life and Re- 
ligion of Zoroaster. Translated from the French. Bombay, 1876. 
(Commercial Press.) 

Kleuker, J. F. Zend-Avesta, Zoroasters Lebendiges Wort. 1 Bd., 3 Thle., 
und 2 Bde., 5 Thle. Riga, 1776-1783. 

Translated from the French of Anquetil du Perron. The ' Anhange ' contain 
valuable material from the classics and other sources. Often consulted. 

M^nant, Joachim. Zoroastre. Essai sur la Philosophie Eeligieuse de la 
Perse. 2"« dd. Paris, 1857. 

General in character. 

Meyer, Ed. Geschichte des Alterthums. Erster Band. Stuttgart, 1884. 

Mills, L. H. A Study of the Five Zarathushtrian (Zoroastrian) Gathas, with 
texts and translations. Oxford and Leipzig, 1892-1894. 

Always consulted on points relating to the Pahlavi version of the Gathas. 
See also SBE. xxxi. 


Mirkhond. History of the Early Kings of Persia. Translated from the 
original Persian, by Shea. London, 1832. 

Especially pp. 263-337. 
Mohl. See Shah Namah. 
Miiller, F. Max. Ed. Sacred Books of the East. Oxford. 

Especially the translations by E. W. West, Darmesteter, Mills. 

Nijldeke, Th. Persische Studien, IT. Sitzb. d. k. Ak. d. Wiss. in Wien, phil. 
hist. CI. Bd. cxxvi. 1-46. Wien, 1892. 

Oldenberg, Hermann. Zarathushtra. Deutsche Rundschau, xiv. Heft 12, 
pp. 402-437, September, 1898. 

A sketch interestingly written. It arrived too late to be referred to in the 
body of the book. On p. 409 of his article, Professor Ol d enberg gives exp res- 
sion to hisviewof Z/s date, which he sajs, however, i^'merjlja^suyective 
estimatej^acing Zoroastfir abojilB.c, 900-800, without discussing the question. 

Pastoret, M. de. Zoroastre, Confucius, et Mahomet. Seconde 6d. Paris, 


Like Brisson, Hyde, and other old writers, this briefly notes some of the 
material accessible at the time. Seldom consulted. 

Ragozin, Zfinaide A. The Story of Media, Babylon, and Persia. (Story of 
the Nations Series.) New York, 1888. 

Rapp. Die Religion und Sitte der Perser und ubrigen Iranier naoh den 
griechischen und romischen Quellen. ZDMG. xix. 1-89 ; xx. 49-204. 

Translated into English by K. R. Cama. Bombay, 1876-1879. 

Shah Namah. Eirdusii Liber Regium qui inscribitur Shah Name, ed. Vul- 
lers (et Landauer). Tom. 3. Lugd. 1877-1884. 

— — Le Livre des Rois par Abou'l Kasim Firdousi, traduit et comments 
par Jules Mohl. 7 vols. Paris, 1876-1878. 

Quotations are based on this translation. 

The Shah Nameh of the Persian Poet Firdausi. Transl. and 

abridged in prose and verse. By James Atkinson. London and New 
York, 1886. (Chandos Classics.) 

Especially pp. 246-313. See also Noldeke, Grundriss, ii. 207 n. 6. 

Spiegel, Fr. Avesta, die heiligen Schriften der Parsen. Uebersetzt. 3 Bde. 
Leipzig, 1852-1863. 

Ueber das Leben Zarathustra's, in Sitzh. der hgl. layer. Akad. der 

Wiss. zu Munchen, 5, January, 1867, pp. 1-92. Mtinchen, 1867. 

Most of this monograph is incorporated into Spiegel's following book. 


Eranisclie Alterthumskunde. 3 vols. Leipzig, 1871-1878. 

The chapter entitled 'Die letzten Kaianier und Zarathushtra ' (Bd. i. 659-724), 
is important here, and is accessible in English by Darab D. P. Sanjana. See 

Tiele, C. P. De Godsdienst van Zarathustra, van haar ontstaan in Baktrie 
tot den val van het Oud-Perzisclie Eijk. Haarlem, 1864. 

Gesohiedenis van den Godsdienst. Amsterdam, 1876. 

lets over de Oudheid van het Avesta. Mededeelingen der K. Ak. 

van Wetenschappen, xi., 3de K., pp. 364-383. Amsterdam, 1895. 

Does not accept Darmesteter's view as to late origin of the Avesta; finds 
traces of Zoroastrianism in the first half of the seventh century B.C. 

Geschichte der Religion im Altertum bis anf Alexander den Grossen. 

Deutsche autorisierte Ausgabe von G. Gehrich. 11 Band. Die Reli- 
gion bei den iranischen Volkern. Erste Half te, pp. 1-187. Gotha, 1898. 

This excellent volume dealing with the religion of Iran arrived too late to 
quote from or to mention except here in the Preface, because the rest of my book 
was already in the press. I should otherwise certainly have referred to such 
pages in the work as bear upon Zoroaster, for example the following : pp. 37-38, 
Gaotema is not identified with Buddha, but rather with the Vedic sage (cf. pp. 
177-178 of the present volume) ; p. 49, age of t he Ave sta, the oldest passages of 
the Younger Avesta, according to Professor Tiele, are tobe placed not much 
later than B.c~Si]0, altliougli they" were not necessarily at that time in their 
peseiitTorninoJ "redaction ; p. 64,'allusibns to Phraortes and Kyaxares; p.^4, 
Atropatane; p. 6h, Bactnan kingdom ; p. 92, Zoroaster in the Gathas ; p. 98, al- 
lusions to Z.'s name and its meaning; pp. 99-107, question as to his historical, 
legendary, or mythical existence ; p. 121, the crad le of the Zoroastrian reform 
is to be soughtin the north and, uortJtwesLpf.Ir?m^_whenoe^^^ 
ably first towa rd the east and southeast of Bactriaj_even as far as Intoj^ t^^iice 
to the southjnto Media Proper ^ad.Persia, 

VuUers, J. A. Fragmente iiber die Religion des Zoroaster, aus dem Per- 
sischen iibersetzt. Bonn, 1831. 
Notes useful. 

West, E. W. Pahlavi Texts translated. Parts 1, 2, 8, 4, 5. Sacred Books 
of the East, ed. F. Max Miiller, vols, v., xviii., xxiv., xxxvii., xlvii. 
Constantly used. Pahlavi quotations in translation are from these volumes. 

Wilson, John. The Parsi Religion : as contained in the Zand-Avasta. Bom- 
bay, 1843. 

The Appendix contains a translation of the Zartusht-Namah by E. B. East- 
wick. Often quoted. 

Windischmann, Fr. Zoroastrische Studien. Abhandlungen, hrsg. von Fr. 
Spiegel. Berlin, 1863. 

Valuable material; excerpts accessible now also In English translation by 
Darab Dastur Peshotan Sanjana. Often consulted. 




Zoroaster's Position among Early Religious Teachers — Zoroaster and 
Buddha — Plan and Scope of the Present Work — Zoroaster as a 
Historical Personage — Sources of Information — Zoroaster in 
the Classics — Conclusion If . . 1-9 




Introduction — Zoroaster an Iranian — The Name Zoroaster (Zara- 
thushtra), its Form and its Meaning — The Date of Zoroaster — 
His Native Place — Zoroaster's Ancestry and his Family ; Gene- 
alogies — Conclusion 10-22 




Introduction — Prophecies of the Coming of Zoroaster, and the Mira- 
cles before his Birth — Birth and Childhood of Zoroaster accord- 
ing to Tradition — Zoroaster's Youth and Education — Period of 
Religious Preparation — Conclusion 23-35 






Introductory Survey — Sources of Information and what we gather 
from them — 'The Revelation ' — First Vision, Conference with 
Ahura Mazda — Second Vision, Vohu Manah — Scenes and Cir- 
cumstances of the Remaining Visions and Conferences with the 
Archangels — The Temptation of Zoroaster — Maidhyoi-Maonha, 
his First Disciple — Conclusion 36-55 




Introduction — Zoroaster seeks Vishtaspa — Meeting between Zara- 
tusht and Vishtasp — Zaratusht disputes with the Wise Men — 
Conspiracy against him; his Imprisonment — The Episode of 
the Black Horse — Complete Conversion of Vishtasp — Coming 
of the Archangels — Vishtasp's Vision — Conclusion . . 56- 




Zoroaster's Patron Vishtaspa — Romantic Story of his Youth — Influ- 
ence of Vishtaspa's adopting the New Faith — Members of Vish- 
taspa's Court ; Immediate Conversions ; Living Personalities in 
the Gathas — Other Members of the Court Circle converted — 
Conclusion 69-79 





Introduction, the Cypress of Kishmar — Conversions more Numerous; 
Spread of the Gospel; Early Religious Propaganda — Spread of 
the Religion in Iran — Some Conversions in Turan — Averred 
Conversions of Hindus — Story of the Brahman ' Cangranghaoah ' 
— The Hindu Sage 'Bias' — Fabled Greek Conversions — Did 
Zoroaster visit Babylon? — Conclusion .... 80-92 




Introduction — Record of a Noteworthy Conversion — Tradition of 
Zoroaster's Healing a Blind Man — Question of Zoroaster's 
Scientific Knowledge — Other Items of Interest, Incidents, and 
Events — The Sacred Fires — Conclusion .... 93-101 




Introduction — Religious Warfare in the Avesta— Arejat-aspa, or 
Arjasp and the Holy Wars — Outbreak of Hostilities; Causes 
and Dates — Arjasp's Ultimatum — His First Invasion ; the Holy 
War begins — Arjasp's Army and its Leaders — Vishtasp's Army 
and its Commanders — Battles of the First War — Isfendiar as 
Crusader, and the Following Events — Arjasp's Second Invasion ; 
theLastlloly War — Summary . . ... 102-123 





Introduction — Greek and Latin Accounts of Zoroaster's Death by 
Lightning or a Flame from Heaven — The Iranian Tradition of 
his Death at the Hand of an Enemy — Conclusion . . 124-132 




Introductory Statements ; the Course of Events — The First Ten Years 
after Zoroaster's Death — Evidence of Further Spread of the Re- 
ligion — Death of the First Apostles — Later Disciples and Suc- 
cessors — Prophecies and Future Events — Summary . . 133-139 



Brief Resume of Zoroaster's Life — General Deductions, Summary and 

Conclusion 140-143 



Short Sketch of the Principal Etymologies or Explanations of Zoro- 
aster's Name that have been suggested from Ancient Times down 
to the Present 147-149 




Introduction — First, a Discussion of those References that assign to 
Zoroaster the Extravagant Date of B.C. 6000 — Second, Allu- 
sions that connect his Name with Ninus and Semiramis — Third, 
the Traditional Date which places the Era of Zoroaster's Teach- 
ing at Some Time during the Sixth Centm-y b.c. — Conclusion 150-178 



A Series of Tables of Zoroastrian Chronology deduced by West basing 

his Calculations upon the Millennial System of the Bundahishn 179-181 



Introduction — Classical References as to Zoroaster's Native Place — 
The Oriental Tradition — Discussion as to whether Eastern Iran 
or Western Iran is rather to be regarded as the Scene of Zoro- 
aster's Ministry — [General SummaryJ 182-225 



Passages in Greek and Latin Authors in which Zoroaster's Name is 
mentioned or Some Statement is made regarding him — The So- 
called Zoroastrian Logia or Oracles 226-273 



Armenian Allusions — Chinese Allusions — Syriac, Arabic, and Other 

Mohammedan or Persian References — Icelandic Allusion . 274-287 





A Syriac Tradition of an Image of Zaradusht — Mention of a Picture 
in the Fire-Temple at Yezd — Reproduction of an Idealized Por- 
trait — The Takht-i Bostan Sculpture, Discussion — Other Sup- 
posed Representations 288-294 

Index 295-316 

Map and Key 317-318 


[Chiefly titles of Zoroastrian texts] 

AJ8L. = 


BB. = 



Dab. = 

Dat. = 


JA08. = 
JBA8. = 


Mkh. = 

Ms., Mss. = 

PAOS. = 

Pers. = 

Phi. = 




ShN. = 

American Journal of Se- 
mitic Languages (for- 
merly Hebraica). 

Avesta, ed. Geldner. 

Bezzenberger's Beitrage. 

Bundahishn {SBE. v. 1- 

Bahman Yasht (SBE. v. 

Dabistan (tr. Shea and 

Datistan-i DInik (SBE. 
xviii. 1-276). 

Dinkart (SBE. xxxvii. 
1-397, 406-418; xlvii. 

Journal American Ori- 
ental Society. 

Journal Royal Asiatic So- 

Kuhn's Zeitschrift. 

Mainog-i Khirat (SBE. 
xxiv. 1-113). 

Manuscript, manuscripts. 

Geiger, Ostiranische Kul- 

Proceedings American 
Oriental Society. 



Sacred Books of the East. 
Ed. P. Max Muller. 

Sad-dar (SBE. xxiv. 253- 

Shikand-gumanik "Vijar 
(SBE. xxiv. 115-251). 

Shah Namah. 


= Shayastla-shayast (SBE. 

V. 237-406). 


= Sanskrit. 


= Vendidad. 


= Vijirkart-i Dinlk. 


= Visperad. 


= Yasna. 


= Yasht. 


= Yatkar-i Zariran (iiber- 

setzt von Geiger). 


= Zoroaster. 


= Selections of Zat-sparam 

(SBE. V. 153-187 and 

xlvii. 131-170). 


= Zartusht Namah (in Wil- 

son's Parsi Religion). 


= ancient. 


= confer, compare. 


= edited by, editor. 


= exempli gratia, for ex- 



= id est, that is. 

1. 11. 

= line, lines. 


= note. 

op. cit. 

r= opus citatum, work quoted 



= original. 

p. pp. 

= page, pages. 


= probably. 


= query, question. 


= sequens, and the follow- 



= tomus, volume. 

tr. transl 

= translated, translation. 


= volume. 




eliri yip fiot, Sick rt rhv Zupodffrpriv imivov Kal rby ZifM>\^iv oiSi ^f 
dyofioLTos taafftv ol iroWoi, fxaXKov di oidi nves ttX-J/p dXiyoiv nvStv. 


Zoroastek's Position among Eaklt Eeligioits Teacheks — Zokoasteb and 
Buddha — Plan and Scope op the Present Wokk — Zoroaster as a 
Historical Personage — Sources op Inpobmation — Zoroaster in the 
Classics — Conclusion 

Zoroaster's Position among Early Religious Teachers. — 

Among the early religious teachers of the East, if we leave 
out the great founders of Judaism and of Christianity, the 
name of Zarathushtra, or Zoroaster, the Persian sage and 
prophet of ancient Iran, is entitled to hold one of the most 
distinguished places. To Zoroaster is due the same rank, 
the same respect, the same reverential regard that is due 
to such seekers after light as Buddha, Confucius, Socrates. 
Ev en some of the great_ t]Mughts_^^_ Christjanity may be 
found to have been^ voiced likewise by _ Zoroaster — a fact 
3vhich~^nnot but be of^ interest — although it belongs else- 
where to discuss the possibility or impossibility of any closer 
or more distant bonds of connection between Judaism and 
Christianity and the faith of ancient Iran. (^Between India 
and Iran, however, a natural connection and kinship is 
acknowledged; and owing to the importance of Buddhism 
as a contrasted faith, a brief parallel between the teachings 


of Zoroaster and the doctrines of Buddha may be drawn by 
way of introduction. 

Both these prophets were filled with a spiritual zeal for 
relieving a people and ameliorating their condition ; both of 
them were inspired with a righteous hope of bettering their 
peoples' lives and of redeeming them from misery and sin; and 
both men became founders of religious faiths. The end and 
aim in both cases was in general alike; but the nature of the 
two minds and of the creeds that were developed shows some 
marked and characteristic, if not radical, differences. The 
faith of Buddha is the more philosophical; the faith of Zoro- 
aster, the more theological. Buddha's doctrine is a creed 
rather of renunciation, quietism, and repose; Zoroaster's creed 
is a law of struggle, action, and reform. India's so-called 
Prophet Prince is overwhelmed with the wretchedness of 
human existence, an existence from which the sole release is 
absorption into Nirvana; Persia's Sage is equally cognizant of 
the existence of woe, but it is no world-woe without hope of 
triumphant domination. The misery which Zoroaster acknow- 
ledges to exist is due to an Evil Principle against whom man 
must struggle all his life and fight the good fight which will 
bring final victory and will win joys eternal at the resurrection^ 
Nevertheless, as a faith in reality, Buddha's belief had in it 
more of the elements of a universal religion; Zoroaster's faith, 
as Geldner has said, possessed rather the elements of a national 
religion, pillions of human souls still take refuge in Buddha; 
the faithful followers that bear the name of Zoroaster to-day do 
not number a hundred thousand. In making such a compari- 
son, however, with regard to the relative proportion between 
the two faiths in the matter of present adherents we must not 
forget that national events and external changes in the world's 
history have contributed as much to this apparent dispropor- 
tion as any inherent and essential difference between the 
nature of the two creeds has done^ 

So much may be said by way of bringing Zoroaster into con- 


trast with the founder of the Indian religion that came after 
his own; and as recent discoveries have thrown so much light 
upon Buddha's life, and archaeological finds have contributed 
so much to substantiating traditions that long have been famil- 
iar but were not always estimated at their true value, it seems 
worth while to take up the subject of Zoroaster's life anew and 
to ascertain all that we are in a position just now to find out 
regarding it. The purpose therefore of the following pages is 
to gather as much material as is accessible at present for illus- 
trating the life and legend of the Prophet of Ancient Iran, and 
this will be done with special reference to tradition. 

( Zoroaster _as^ a JB jstorical Eersonage. — Before proceeding 
to details with regard to the prophetic teacher of Iran, one 
point must be emphasized at the outset, and an opinion must 
definitely be expressed; this is with reference to the ques- 
tion raised as to whether Zoroaster be a historical person- 
age, a real figure whose individuality is indelibly stamped 
upon the religion of Persia of old. An affirmative answer 
must be given, for Zoroaster js a historical character. This 
point is emphasized because it is not so long ago that 
advanced scholarship for a time cast a cloud of doubt 
over the subject;^ but happily the veil of myth is now 
di^elled. Scholars are generally agreed that althou^legend 
or fable may have gathered about the name of the prophet 
of ancient Iran, the figure of the great reformer, never- 
theless, stands out clearly enough to be .recognized in its 
general outlines ; and suf&ci jnt data for his life can be col- 

1 Among other references noted by Oxford, 1880). For the historical side 

Spiegel, Eranische AUerthumskunde, of the question see Geldner, ' Zoroas- 

i. 708 n., mention may be made of ter' EncyelopcBdia Britannica, 9th ed.. 

Kern, Over het Woord Zarathustra en xxiv. 820, and consult Spiegel, EA. i. 

den mythischen Persoon van dien Naam 707-708, and recently, with emphasis, 

(1867) ; observe also Spiegel's remark in ZDMGr. lii. 193. Darmesteter later 

in Die arische Periode, § 43, p. 299 expressed himself more cautiously, see 

(Leipzig, 1887); and especially the late LeZA. iii. Introd. p. 75 seq. (Paris, 

lamented Darmesteter, Zend-Avesta, 1893), and .Zedti-^TCsto, Introd. p. 63, 

Part i. Introd. pp. 76-79 (_SBE. iv. § 10, 2d ed. (/S5J7. iv. Oxford, 1896). 


lected to __enable one to give a. clear and correct idea of his 
personality and in.diyidualityj>) There are parts, it is true, 
in every great man's life regarding which nothing is known 
(one has only to think of the Shakspere-Bacon controversy); 
and in the case of all early teachers' lives there are many 
lacunse to be filled. The broken fragments of the statue 
are sometimes separated so far that we cannot find many 
of the missing chips, and we must be content to piece the 
parts imperfectly together. Caution must necessarily be 
used in such restorations. The existence of legend, fable, and 
even of myth, may be admitted in dealing with Zoroaster's life.; 
some apocryphal literature is acknowledged to have grown up 
about the hallowed Messiah of Christianity ;2 but the shadowy 
substance gathered about the figure of Zoroaster must not be 
allowed to shroud and obscure his true personality. Cautious 
we must be, conservative we must be, yet not so far as to 
exclude a willingness to recognize characteristic traits and 
features, or to define more sharply objects and forms whose 
outlines are now and then somewhat dimly presented. In the 
present research an attempt will be made frankly to give warn- 
ing where points are doubtful ; and difficult as it is at this 
remote day, an endeavor will be made fairly and impartially to 
distinguish between fiction on the one hand and underlying 
facts on the other, so far as they may be looked upon as reason- 
ably certain, presumable, or plausible. The achievement un- 
doubtedly falls far short of the aim in the present monograph ; 
and some will feel that too much weight is given to traditional 
statements ; but in the absence of other authority we have at 
least these to turn to ; and the purpose is to lay these down 
for reference and for judgment. After this prefatory note has 
been given, attention may now be directed to the sources of 
our knowledge in antiquity respecting the life and legend of 
Zoroaster as a historical personage. 

1 See especially Dr. E. W. West in 2 See Apocryphal New Testament, 

SEE. xlvii. Introd. pp. ,29-30 (Ox- London, 1820. 
ford, 1897). 


Sources of Information about , Zor oaster's L ife. — The data for 
reconstructing an outline of tlae life of the great reformer may 
be conveniently classified, first (1) as Iranian, second (2) as 
non-Iranian. Naturally the various sources are not all of equal 
importance ; yet each has a certain intrinsic value. 
/Among (1) the Iranian sources of information the Avesta, 
of course, stands foremost in importance as the material with 
which to begin ; and in the Avestan Gathas, or Psalms, Zoro- 
aster is personally presented as preaching reform or teaching 
a new faith. The entire Pahlavi literature serves directly to 
supplement the Avesta, somewhat as the patristic literature of 
the Church Fathers serves to supplement the New Testament. 
Especially valuable is the material in the Pahlavi Dinkart and 
the Selections of Zat-sparam, material which has been made 
accessible by Dr. E. W. Westjin his 'Marvels of Zoroastri- 
anism' (S £II. xlv ji.. Pahlavi Texts, Part V.; Oxford, 1897). 
Without West's work many of the following pages could not 
have been written. Of similar character, as based chiefly upon 
these two sources, is the lat er Persian Zartusht Namah, which 
was composed in the thirteenth century of our era.^ Firdausi's 
Shan Namah,_of the tenth century A. D.j_contains^ abundant old 
material_bearin£ u£on the reign of Zoroaster's patron. King 
Gushtasp (Vishtaspa)^) Some other Parsi works and tradi- 
tional literature mayTe included in the list, but these will be 
mentioned as occasion arises in the course of the investiga- 
tion.^ Zoroaster is not mentioned in the Ancient Persian 
Inscriptions, but the silence may be accounted for. 

1 See Eastwick's translation in Firdausi says he has incorporated into 

Wilson, The Parsi Religion, pp. 477- the Shah Namah. Scholars are gener- 

522, Bombay, 1843. Consult "West in ally inclined to accept the truth of the 

Grundriss der iran. Philol. ii. 122 ; statement. See Noldeke in Grundriss 

SBE. xlvii. Introd. pp. 20-24. der iran. Philol. ii. 147-150. 

" Firdausi expressly states that the ' West, The Modern Persian Zoro- 

portion of his chronicle which relates astrian Literature, Grundriss der iran. 

to Zoroaster (Zardusht) is derived from Philol. ii. 122-129, and Spiegel, Die tra- 

his own poetic predecessor, Dakiki, ditionelle Literatur der Parsen (Wien, 

who was cruelly murdered when he 1860). 
had sung hut a thousand verses. These 


(^^_The non-Iranian sources are either (a) ClassifiaL or 
(5) Oriental. The latter include especially the allusions to 
Zoroaster in Syriac and Arabic literature,^ as well as some 
Armenian references and other incidental mentions. ^ In point 
of antiquity the classical references, as a rule, rank next to the 
Avesta ; and these allusions, even though they are foreign, are 
often of real importance, as they serve to check or to substan- 
tiate results which are based upon various authorities.^ The 
Appendixes to the present volume will render most of this 
material easily accessible. 

Zoroaster in the Classics.* — All classical antiquity is agreed 
on the point that Zoroaster was a historical personage, even 
though his figure was somewhat indistinct in the eyes of these 
ancient authors. To the writers of Greece and Rome he was 
the arch-representative of the Magi ; ^ and he sometimes seems 
to be more famous for the magic arts which are ascribed to his 
power than for either the depth and breadth of his philosophy 
and legislation, or for his religious and moral teaching. None 
the less, he was regarded as a great sage and as a prophet whose 
name was synonymous with Persian wisdom, or as the founder 
of the Magian priesthood who are sometimes said to be his 
pupils and followers.® 

1 Gottheil, Beferences to Zoroaster this subject, see Appendix V. at the 

in Syriac and Arabic Literature, Clas- end of this volume, 
sioal Studies in Honour of Henry Dris- ^ Consult also the Pahlavi Dinkart, 

ler, pp. 24-51, New York, 1894 (Co- 9. 69, 58 ; 4. 21. 34 {8BE. xxxvii. 

lumbia Univ. Press). , pp. 397, 412, 417), and see Av. moyii, 

"^ Chinese, for example ; but these mo~/uiMS, Justi, Handhueh der Zend- 

have not yet been made generally ac- sprache, p. 235. 
cessible. Consult Appendix VI. « Platonic Alcibiades I, p. 122, A, 

8 For instance, an allusion to Zoro- /jtayelav . . . riji/ Zapoda-rpov toB 'Qpoiid- 

aster which is found in the Preface to fou • eo-rt dk toOto eeuv eepairela. Cf. 

the Younger Edda is probably trace- also Apuleius, de Magia, xxiv. (Rapp, 

able to some classical or Semitic orig- 2'Z>ilf ff. xix. p. 21 n.). So Hermodorus 

inal. See Jackson in Proceedings of as cited by Diogenes Laertius, Fragm. 

the American Oriental Society, xvi. p. Hist. Grcec. 9, ed. Muller ; Plutarch, 

cxxvi. March, 1894. Appendix VI. Isis et Osiris, 46 ; Clemens Alexan- 

* For a collection of the material on drinus, Stromata, i. p. 304 ; Pliny, 


The Magi, as we know from Herodotus, were a tribe, not 
merely a priestly family, and tlie right of the classics to call 
Zoroaster a Magian is borne out in other ways. The Pahlavi 
Dinkart regards the ' Avesta and Zand ' as the sacred writings 
of the Magian priests.^ The learned Arab chronologist AlbiriinI 
adds that ' the ancient Magians existed already before the time 
of Zoroaster, but now there is no pure unmixed portion of 
them who do not practice the religion of Zoroaster.'^ Several 
Syriac and Arabic writers speak of him as ' a Magian,' ' head of 
the Magians,' 'chief of the sect,' 'Magian prophet,' 'diviner.'^ 
This direct association of his name with the Magi is perhaps to 
be understood with some limitations ; but the Magi were the 
reputed masters of learning in ancient times, and Zoroaster 
stood for this learning in antiquity.* 

Of the Magian teachings and doctrines it is difficult to form 
a clear picture, except so far as we may believe them to be 
reflected in Zoroaster, after we have made due allowance for 
changes or reforms that he may have instituted. The classical 
tradition that Pythagoras studied under these masters in 
Babylon may not be altogether without foundation.^ Plato 
we know was anxious to visit the Orient and to study with 
the Magi, but the Persian wars with Greece prevented him.^ 

Hist. Nat. 30. 2. 1 ; Agathias, 2, 24 ; tione, 1. 23 et al.; 'Wmdisohmann, Zor. 

Plutarch, Numa, 4 ; Suidas, s.v. Py- Stud. p. 277 n. 

thagoras ; cf. Rapp, ZDMG. xix. p. ' See Appendix V. below, and cf. 

21 seq. ; "Windlsclimann, Zor. Stud. p. Luoian.jDiaZog'. cited by Kleuker,Zen(i- 

44. See Appendix V. at the end of Avesta, Anh. ii. 3, p. 104 ; Cicero, de 

this volume. Finibus, 5. 29 ; Valerius Maximus, 8. 

1 Dk. 4. 21 ; 4. 34, "West, Phi. Texts 7 ; Pliny, S. JST. 30. 2. 1 ; Apuleius, 
Trans, in SBE. xxxvii. pp. 412, Florid, p. 19 ; Porphyrins, Vita Pytha- 
417. gorce, 41 ; Laotantius, Institutiones, 

2 Albirunl, Chronology, transl. by 4. 2 ; lamblichus, Vita Pythagorce, 19 ; 
Sachau, p. 314, London, 1879. Clemens Alexandrinus, Stromata, i. 

8 Gottheil, Beferences to Zoroaster p. 357. Consult Windisohmann, Zor. 

in Syriac and Arabic Literature, pp. Stud. pp. 260-264. 
24-51, in Classical Studies in Honour 5 Diogenes Laertius, Philosoph. Vit. 

of Henry Drisler, New York, 1894 3. 7 ; Apuleius, de Doctrin. Plat. Phil. 

(Columbia Univ. Press). p. 569. The Anonym. Vit. Plat. p. 7, 

* For example, Cicero, de Divina- ed. Westermann, Paris, 1862, adds 


The followers of the Sophist Prodicus, a contemporary of 
Socrates, are reported to have boasted their possession of 
secret writings of Zoroaster ; ^ and even a Magian teacher, one 
Gobryas, is claimed as instructor of Socrates. ^ Aristotle, 
Deinon, Eudoxus of Cnidus, and especially Theopompus, were 
familiar with Zoroastrian tenets.^ A work bearing the name 
of Zoroaster by Heraclides Ponticus, a pupil of Plato and of 
Aristotle, is mentioned in Plutarch.* The distinguished phi- 
losopher Hermippus (about B.C. 200) made careful studies of 
Magism and of Zoroastrian writers, according to Pliny (H. N. 
30. 2. 1). Zoroaster and Magian were names to conjure with, 
and there are numerous allusions to ideas drawn from these 
sources in Plutarch, Strabo, Suidas, and others. 

Titles of a number of purported books of Zoroaster are also 
given in the classics, such as Trepl <\>vaeco<i, Trepl XlOcov rifiioav, 
/SiySXtot aTTOKpvifioi, ZcopodcTTpov, acrrepocTKOTTiK^ ZapodcTTpov.^ 
Furthermore, some 'sayings' of Zoroaster, like those men- 
tioned by Gemistus Pletho, MayiKa Xojia raiv cnrb tov Zmpo- 
dcTTpov Mdycov, are both reported to have existed, and passages 
are occasionally claimed to be taken from them. Like other 
such productions, however, these are all probably apocryphal, 
although the encyclopsedic character of the titles somewhat 
recalls the analysis and summaries that we have of the Zoroas- 
trian Nasks.^ At all events, these references and allusions show 
how great a reputation was enjoyed by Zoroaster in classical 
antiquity, even if his name does not occur in Herodotus '^ nor 

that in Phcenicia Plato met with « Plutarch, Adv. Colot. p. 1115 A ; 

Persians who introduced him to Zoro- of. Windischmann, Zor. Stud. p. 284. 

astrian lore. Cf. Appendix V. § 1. Thanks also to friend Lanman. 

1 Clemens Alexandrinus, Stromata, ^ See allusions in Suidas and in 
i. p. 357. Pliny. Appendix V. below. 

2 Darmesteter, Le ZA. iii. Introd. p. « West, Pahlavi Texts, Translated 
77. in SBE. xxxvii. 1-488. 

8 Diogenes Laertius, Prooem. 8 ; ' Cf . de Harlez, Des Origines du 

Pliny, H. N. 30. 2. 1 ; Plutarch, 7s. et Zoroastrisme, p. 276, Journal Asia- 

Os. 47 ; of. Wmdiscb.vaa,nn, Zor. Stud. tique, 1878-79; Darmesteter, LeZA 

pp. 233 n., 279 n., and App. V. helow. iii. Introd. p. 76. 


in Xenophon, nor with certainty in tlie extant fragments of 
Ctesias. The earliest authenticated classical allusion to Zoroas- 
ter by name seems to be the reference in the Platonic Alci- 
biades ;i although, according to Diogenes Laertius (JProoim. 2), 
he was mentioned by the earlier Xanthus of Lydia.^ 

Conclusion. — As Zoroaster is one of the great religious 
teachers of the East, his life as well as his work is worthy of 
study from its historical importance. Our information regard- 
ing his life is to be gathered from the Zoroastrian scriptures, 
the Avesta and the Pahlavi writings, and other material must 
be used to supplement or to correct these sources. Due 
weight must be given to tradition. It must also be remembered 
that fiction as well as fact has doubtless gathered about the 
name of this religious reformer. This latter fact is all the 
more a proof of his great personality. 

1 See AXcihiad,es I, 122, p. 131, ed. consult also my article ' Zoroaster ' 
Schanz. in Harper's Dictionary of Classical 

' See Appendix V. below, and Antiquities, New York, 1897. 



Sa jdto yena jatena ydti vams'ah samunnatim. 

— Hitopadbs'a. 

Introduction — Zoroaster an Iranian — The Name Zoroaster (Zara- 
thtjshtka), its Eokm and its Meaning — The Date op Zoroaster — 
His Native Place — Zoroaster's Ancestry and his Familt ; Genealo- 
gies — Conclusion 

Introduction. — When a man rises to lasting fame, all that is 
associated with his name and his times becomes of interest 
and of importance. Lustre is shed upon his family, and dis- 
tinction is lent to the line that produced such a son. If 
great men are the children of their age, the age of a great 
religious teacher can but deserve attention. His own origin, 
the influences that may have been formative in his life, his 
environment and surroundings, alike become worthy of con- 
sideration. The nature and condition of the country which 
called him forth requires some remark, and with regard to 
Zoroaster it is to be regretted that we do not know more than 
we do of Iran in early antiquity, and that only a limited space 
can be devoted here to this special theme, although it receives 
more or less treatment in different places throughout the book. 
This prophet's teaching found fruitful soil in the land of 
Ancient Iran, because the seed was already in the hearts of the 
people, if we may adapt the phrase of a renowned author. 

Zoroaster of Iran. — Zoroaster, it is believed, sprang up in 
the seventh century before the Christian era, somewhere in 



the land between tlie Indus and the Tigris. Before our mind 
rises first a picture of the world outside of Iran, the kingdoms 
of Assyria and Babylon, with their long line of dynasties 
reaching far back into history which antedates Iran ; ^ to the 
southeast lies India, bound by the ties of Indo-Iranian unity ; 
lastly, and to offset all, Turan, the rival and foe, the synonym 
of everything crude, uncouth, and barbarous, borders upon 
the Iranian territory to the north. But to return to the 
land of Iran itself during this period. There exists, or is 
claimed to have existed in early times, an eastern Iranian 
kingdom in Bactria. An uncertainty with regard to this 
point will be noted hereafter. Media, however, has already 
been known to fame in history long before this period ; and in 
the eighth century B.C. its power was able to throw off the 
yoke of Assyria, and at the close of the seventh century 
(B.C. 606) to crush Nineveh and establish the Median dynasty 
of Ecbatana, which may be called the first of the great Iranian 
kingdoms.^ But the decadence of Media swiftly follows, and 
its glory is dimmed before the splendor of the rising Persian 
sun. So much for the period and land in which Zoroaster 

During the very lifetime of Zoroaster — if we accept the 
traditional dates — the Jews were carried into captivity in 
Babylon, and their return from exile to Jerusalem takes place 
less than a generation after his death. If the Persian wars 
with Greece stand for anything in the world's history, when 
Orient and Occident met at Marathon, Platsea, Salamis, when 
the East received its first shock and set-back from the "West, 
certainly we must feel an interest in the life of that man who 
is commonly spoken of as the lawgiver of the Persians. His 

1 In the Avesta, Babylon is the seat, compare Tiele, Geschichte der Beli- 

of the semi-mythical tyrant and demon gion, i. 1. pp. 127-213. 

Azhi Dahaka, who destroyed the ^ Cf. also the article ' Iranians ' 

Iranian ideal king Yima (Jem-shed) (AVWJ.) in Johnson's Universal 

and ruled for a thousand years. On Oyclopoedia, iv. 670. 
the religion of Babylon and Assyria, 


name, his date, and his native place, his family, his ancestry, 
and his associations, are all matters of some moment. These 
will be given in this chapter before turning to the more pict- 
uresque story of his life. The question of his religious beliefs, 
teaching, and philosophy, can be dealt with only incidentally, 
as this is reserved for treatment in another work. 

The Name Zoroaster (Zarathushtra), its Form and its Mean- 
ing. — The form of the Prophet's name in the Avesta con- 
sistently appears as ZaraOuStra, or with the fuller patronymic 
as Spitama ZaraduStra^ The shapes or disguises which this 
appellative has assumed in other languages show as much 
variety as does the spelling of the name of the English reformer 
Wyclif (Wycliff, Wyclyffe, etc.). The familiar form (a) Zoro- 
aster is adopted from Zoroastres of the Latin, which in turn 
is modelled after the Greek form. (6) In Greek the name 
commonly appears as Zcopodcrrpr]^,^ but sporadic variations are 
found, for example ZapoaSo?, ZapdSr]? beside Zcopodarpr]'; in 
Agathias 2. 24, or the anomalous 'D,pd)a<TTOi (Georgius Hamar- 
tolus), see Appendix V. ; or again, the forms Zdparo^,^ Zapij?,* 
which are also quotable from the Greek, seem to be based upon 
the later Persian form. A grsecized Armenian form (Arm. 
ZaraveW) is cited from Cephalion ;^ and Diodorus Siculus (1. 94) 
has Zadpava-TT]';,^ which recalls the Avestan form, Zarathushtra, 

1 Consult Just:, Iranisches Namen- arpiun (gen.) cf. Lassen ZKM. Yi. 541, 
huch, p. 380, Marburg, 1895 ; Win- n. 2. 

dischmann, Zor. Stud. pp. 44, 45 ; de " Porphyrius, Vita FythagorcB, p. 

Harlez, Avesta traduit, Introd. p. xxi. 18, ed. Nauck ('0 Tivdayopai) vpis 

Cf. also Anquetil du Perron, Zend- ZdpaTov i^lKero. 

Avesta, i. Pt. 2, p. 2, Paris, 1771, and * Suidas, s.v. Pythagoras ; see Ap- 

Hyde, Hist. Belig. vet. Pers. p. 307 seq. pendix V., § 45. 

Oxford, 1700. See also Appendix I. ^ From Cephalion through Eusehius 

2 Diogenes Laertius, de Vit. Philos. (Armen. Versio, p. 41, ed. Mai), ao- 
Prooem. 2. p. 1 (recens. Cohet), Paris, cording to de Harlez, Av. tr. Introd. 
1850. Observe that Plutarch, Is. et Os. p. xx. See Justi, Iran. Namenhuch, 
46, once has Zw/)4oo-Tpis, once the usual 380a, on Zaravastes In MuUer, Fragm. 
Zapod<TTprii (Numa, 4), and once the ill. 626, 627. 

curious SiiiroffT/)os (Quwst. Conviv. 4. * Diodorus Siculus, 1. 94. 2, Hapi, 

1. 1). On Zoroastes (sic) in Isidorus, fih yi.p 'Apiavoh ZaffpavaTiir. See Ap- 
see Appendix V. § 38 ; and on Zapa- pendix V. § 3 below. 


of tlie Prophet's name.^ (c) An Armenian rendering of the 
appellative is given as Zradasht.^ (c?) The Syriac and Arabic 
writings show the name under a variety of guises, but they 
generally agree with the Pahlavi or Modern Persian form.^ 
(e) The Pahlavi version of the name is usually given ZaratuSt.^ 
(/) Some of the Modern Persian varieties are ZartuSt, Zardust, 
ZdrduU, ZarduhaSt, ZardtuU, ZardduU, ZaratuhaU, ZardduhaU, 
Zdrdhust.^ All these are variations of Avestan Zara9uStra. 

The question as to the significance of the name of Iran's pro- 
phetic teacher is not without interest. India's princely reformer 
was the ' Enlightened ' (^Buddha) or the ' Sakya Sage ' QSdkya- 
muni) ; Jesus of Nazareth, the Son of God, was the Wonderful, 
the Counsellor, the Anointed ( Qhristus) . In ancient Iran Zoroas- 
ter, the Righteous, was called ZaraduStra, or ZaraOuUra Spitama, 
Spitama Zaradustra, or sometimes simply Spitama. The title 
Spitama is a family designation, and the name comes from an 
ancestor of the Prophet, a heros eponymus of the clan.^ The 
Spitaman name is elsewhere found early in Media. The deriva- 
tion of this patronymic Spitama, used as an appellative, is 
apparently from the Av. root spit- ' be white ' = Skt. s'vit-, and 
the significance is probably ' descendant of White,' like the 
English Whit-ing. The origin of ZaraOuUra itself is less 

1 The Greek form Zopoi.<TTp7is, or The Booh of the Mainyo-i-Khard, 
Zapoiarpris, is apparently to be ex- p. 223 ; Stuttgart, 1871. 

plained as derived from Av. Zara- * See the genealogy given below, 

thushtra through a Western Iranian p. 19, and consult Justi, Handbuch 

presumable form * Zara''uStra, cf. der Zendsprache, svib Yoce ; also Ira- 

Bartholomae in Cfrundriss d. iran. nisches Namenbuch, Marburg, 1895. 

Philologie, i. §§ 93, 264 (8). Zoroaster's daughter is Pourucistd 

2 See also Hiibschmann, Fersische Spitdmi, Ys. 53. 3 ; his cousin is 
Studien, p. 204, Strassburg, 1895. MaidyoimAwha Spitama, Ys. 51. 19 ; 

8 See Gottheil, Eeferences to Zoro- the members of the family are spoken 

aster in Syriac and Arabic Writers, of as the Spitamas (Ys. 46. 15) Spita- 

p. 25 seq. m&who. In Pahlavi, the Prophet is 

■' West, Pahlavi Texts Translated, called ZaratuH i Spitdmdn, ' Zoroaster 

Part 5, in SBE. xlvii. 180, In- of the Spitamas ' ; the Mod. Pers. has 

dex. Jsflmdn, see Justi, Iran. Namenhuch, 

6 Cf . Vullers, Lexicon Persico- p. 309 ; SiriTo/ias, ZiriSiiirj! are quota- 

Latinum, ii. p. 103, Bonn, 1865 ; "West, ble as ordinary Iranian proper names. 


clear than Spitama and the derivation has been much discussed. 
Scholars, however, are now generally agreed upon one point ; it 
is that the second member of the compound (for the form must 
be a composite) is the word uStra- ' camel,' ^ but the precise 
nature of the compound and the true meaning of its first ele- 
ment are uncertain. The most probable significations that have 
been proposed are : ' one whose camels are old ' (sar ' be old 'Y 
or ' old camel ' (cf. Skt. jarad-gava, jarat-hdru-') ; or again ' one 
whose camel is fierce ' (zar ' be angry ') or possibly ' tormenting 
the camel'; or 'robbing a camel' (cf. Skt. bharadvdja). Numer- 
ous other suggestions and explanations have been offered ; and 
some of them show a good deal of fancy ; but doubtless the name 
is an unromantic, unpoetic name, a title which the man retained 
as his birthright even after he became famed as a spiritual and 
religious teacher. The very fact of his retaining this somewhat 
prosaic appellative testifies to a strong personality ; Zoroaster 
remains a man and he is not dubbed anew with a poetic title 
when later sanctification has thrown a halo of glory about his 
head. For an outline of the various discussions of Zoroaster's 
name, the reader is referred to the special Appendix.^ 

The Date of Zoroaster. — With reference to the date at which 
Zoroaster lived and taught, there has been a wide diversity of 
opinion, but now a more general agreement between the views 
of scholars on the subject is beginning to prevail. The con- 
sensus of opinion has of late been growing stronger in favor of 
accepting the traditional view, based on the chronology of the 

1 The esteem in which the Baotrian ' cow,' -uxian ' ox,' which are probably 

camel is held is well known (cf. Yt. totemistic family survivals ; see Justi, 

14. 11-13). Other Iranian proper Iranisches Namenhuch, p. 486 seq., 

names contain uUra, e.g. FraSaoUra Marburg, 1895. 

' whose camels are fresh,' AravaoHra ^ Cf. Hubsohmann, KZ. xxvi. p. 

' whose camel does not bellow ' (cf. 203 ; Geldner, Zoroaster, Encyclopss- 

ravo-fraoBman), VohuHra ' having dia Britannioa, 9th ed. xxiv. p. 820 ; 

good camels ' (Yt. 13. 122, cf. Spiegel, Bartholomae, in Grundriss d. iran. 

Fran. Alterthumskunde, i. p. 673). Phil. i. pp. 149-150; A.F. i. p. 160; 

There are many similar compound ap- I.F. vi. Anz. p. 47. 
pellatives with -aspa 'horse,' gao- » See Appendix I. below. 


Bundaliishn, which places the era of Zoroaster's activity 
between the latter half of the seventh century B.C. and the 
middle of the sixth century. A detailed discussion of the 
question with a general presentation of the material on 
the subject has been given by the present writer in a mono- 
graph on The Bate of Zoroaster, JAOS. xvii. 1-22, 1896 
(reprinted in Appendix II.). The results are rendered even 
more precise by a slight chronological correction by Dr. E. 
W. West,i who gives the years B.C. 660-583 as probably the 
exact date of Zoroaster so far as tradition is concerned. There 
is space here only to summarize ; for details reference must be 
made to Appendix II., III. 

The statements of antiquity on the subject may conveniently 
be divided into three groups. 

First (l)/to be considered are those references that assign 
to Zoroaster the extravagant age of B.C. 6000. These are 
confined simply to the classics, but they have a certain claim to 
attention because they are based upon information possessed 
by Aristotle, Eudoxus, and Hermippus.^ These extraordinary 
figures are due to the Greeks' not having quite rightly under- 
stood the statements of the Persians who place Zoroaster's 
millennium amid a great world-period of 12,000 years, which 
they divided into cycles, and in accordance with this belief 
Zoroaster's fravasi had actually existed in company with the 
archangels for several thousands of years. Second (2) come 
those statements which connect the name of Zoroaster with 
that of the more or less legendary Ninus and the uncertain 
Semiramis.3 Third (3) the direct Zoroastrian tradition 

1 Personal letter, dated April 30, 122 ; Diogenes Laertius, de Vit. Philos. 
1897, and in a published view with Proosm. 2; Lactantius, Inst. 7. 15, 
chronological table, SBE. xlvii. In- and cf. Suidas, s.v. Zoroastres. 

trod. pp. 27-42. See Appendix III. ^ Cf. Diodorus Siculus, 2. 6 ; Frag- 

2 The passages are given in full in ments of Cephalion in Euseb. Chron. 
Appendix II. ; they are from Pliny, 1. 43 and 4. 35 ; Theon, Progymnas- 
B. N. 30. 2. 1 ; Plutarch, 7s. et Os. 46 ; mata, 9 ; Justin, from Trogus Pom- 
Scholion to the Platonic Alcibiades I, peius' Hist. Philippic. 1. 1 ; Amobius, 


whicli is found in the Pahlavi book Bundahishn 34. 1-9 and 
supported by Arta Viraf 1. 2-5 and Zat-sparam 23. 12, as 
well as corroborated by abundant Arabic allusions (Albiruni, 
Masudi, and others) unanimously places the opening of 
Zoroaster's ministry at 258 years before the era of Alexander, 
or 272 years before the close of the world-conqueror's life 
(B.C. 323). As Zoroaster was thirty years old, according to the 
tradition, when he entered upon his ministry ; and as he was 
seventy-seven years old at the time of his death ; and, further- 
more, since we may assume an omission of thirty-five years 
in the Biindahishn chronological list, according to West, we 
have good reason, on the authority of the tradition, for making 
B.C. 660-588 as the era of Zoroaster. 

Tradition also says that Zoroaster was forty-two years old 
when he converted King Vishtaspa, who became the patron of 
the faith. There is no good ground, however, for identifying 
this ruler with Hystaspes, the father of Darius. Such identi- 
fication has indeed been made by Ammianus Marcellinus 
(22. 6. 32), and it has met with support from some ; but the 
doubt on this point which was raised as early as Agathias 
(2. 24) is unquestionably well founded.^ 

Zoroaster's Native Place. — The question of Zoroaster's native 
place is a subject that has been much debated. The problem 
is more complicated because of the uncertainty which exists as 
to whether his birthplace and early home was necessarily also 
the chief scene of the teacher's activity. The whole matter 
may be brought under the heading of two inquiries : first 
(1), whether the home of Zoroaster is to be placed in the west 
of Iran, in Atropatene and Media; second (2), whether 

Adv. Gentes, 1. 5 ; Orosius, Hist, contra i Fuller discussion in West, SBE. 

Paganos (Ninus) ; Suidas, s.v. Zoro- xlyii. Introd. p. 38, and Jackson, On 
astres. See Appendix II. , V. Some in- the Date of Zoroaster, JAOS. xvii. 
cidental allusions connect Zoroaster's 17 ; Appendix II. below, 
name with Abraham, Nimrod, Bel, 
Balaam. These also are quoted in 
Appendix II., V. below. 


ancient Media was the scene also of his ministry, or are we 
to accept the claim of Bactria and eastern Iran? Possibly 
he may have taught in both lands. The subject is of interest, 
moreover, in the light of the recent important developments 
with regard to Buddha's birthplace, and the archieological finds 
which have lately contributed so much towards establishing the 
exact location where the gentle teacher of India was ushered 
into the world. Accordingly, the problem of Zoroaster's native 
place and then the possible scene of his ministry is discussed 
with considerable fulness in Appendix IV; it suffices merely 
to summarize here. 

If we omit the question of his ministry for the moment and 
speak simply of his native place, we may say without much 
hesitation, that the consensus of scholarly opinion at this time 
is generally agreed in believing that Zoroaster arose in the 
west of Iran. Oriental tradition seems to be fairly correct in 
assigning, as his native land, the district of Atropatene or 
Adarbaijan, to the west of Media, or even more precisely the 
neighborhood about Lake Urumiah. There is ground, further- 
more, for believing in the tradition which says that his 
father was a native of Adarbaijan, — a region of naphtha wells 
and oil fountains, — and that Zoroaster's mother was from the 
Median Ragha (Rai) — consult the map at the end of this 
volume. Explicit references for these statements will be 
found in Appendix IV. For the other problem, the one 
rel'ating to the possible scene or scenes of Zoroaster's ministry, 
reference must be made to the extended discussion in the 
same appendix below. Here we need only bear in mind that 
there is every reason to believe that Zoroaster, for a time at 
least, wandered about in his missionary labors, and there is 
certainly a strong tradition to the effect that during the two 
opening years of his prophetic career he was for a while in the 
east, in Seistan, and also in Turan — see Map. One is re- 
minded of the peregrinations of the Buddha. 

Zoroaster's Ancestry and His Family. — - The subject of gene- 


alogy lias not much interest for most readers, and a treatment of 
it is apt to recall the ' begat ' chapters of the Biblical patriarchs. 
Nevertheless Zoroaster's line is not without importance, and it 
deserves to receive attention, as much as would the descent of 
Mohammed or of Buddha. If Indian legend and tradition in 
the case of the great Ganges teacher ascribes exalted origin from 
the princely family of the Sakyas, Iranian story is no less suc- 
cessful, for its part, in tracing Zoroaster's descent from a sort 
of royal Davidic line that ends in the house of Maniishcihar, 
sovereign of Iran,^ or ascending still farther back through the 
forty-fifth generation to Gayomart, the Iranian Adam, the father 
of all mankind.^ The Prophet's more immediate ancestors are 
often referred to. Pourushaspa, the father, is mentioned several 
times in the Avesta and is frequently referred to in the Pahlavi 
texts and in the later Zoroastrian literature. The name of 
Zoroaster's mother is preserved in an Avestan fragment as 
Dughdhova (Phi. Dughdavo, Diikdav or Diiktaiibo, Mod. 
Pers. Dughdu).3 The name of Zoroaster's great-grandfather 
Haecat-aspa is mentioned in the Avesta (Ys. 46. 15 ; 53. 3), 
as is also the latter's sire Cikhshnush or Chakhshni (cf. Yt. 13. 
114) ; and Spitama, the heros eponymus of the family, is refer- 
red to in the Gatha allusions to the Prophet's kinsman Spita- 
maonho (Ys. 46. 15), whence his own appellative Zarathushtra 
Spitama, Zoroaster the Spitamid. The locus classicus for tra- 
cing Zoroaster's lineage is Bundahishn 32. 1-2; it is supple- 
mented by the Pahlavi Dinkart 7. 2, 70, the Selections of Zat- 
sparam, 13, 6, and by the Vijirkart-i Dinig; compare also the 
Nirang-i Boidatano va Yatkartano (^Q-rundriss ii. 115).* The 

1 CTn Mantishoihar, cf. Peshotan xxiv. 302 ; xxxvii. 444, 469, 483 ; 
Dastur, Dinkart translated, vol. vii. xlvii. (eight times); Darmesteter, Le 
p. 429 ; cf. Yasht 13. 131. ZA. iii. 151 ; Zartusht Namah, p. 480 

2 Dk. 7. 2. 70, Zsp. 13. 5-6 ; cf. West, (in Wilson, Parsi Belig.) and Shahvas- 
8BE. xlvii. pp. 34, 140, and Grundriss tani (see Appendix IV.). 

d. iran. Phil. ii. 95. 4 Consult West, Pahlavi Texts 

8 Hatokht Nask Frag, cited in Sad translated, SBE. v. 140-141 ; Grun- 

Dar 40. 4 et passim ; cf. West, SBE. driss, ii. 94, 95, and SBE. xlvii. 34, 



same ancestral tree, but witli the names disguised or misread, 
is found in Masiidi.i The line as far back as Manush-cithra 
may be worth recording from the accessible sources. 

Dk., Bundahislin, and 
cf. Zsp. 


Manushcihar 2 


Airic or Rajan 

Nayazem or AySzem ' . . . 
Vaedislit or Vidasht . . . 
Spitam or Spitaman . . . 
HardMr (Kharedhar) . . . 
Arejadharshn or Hardarshn . 
Paetrasp or Paitlrasp . . . 
Cikhshniisli or Cakhslinush * 


Urugadhasp or Aurvadasp ^ . 
Patiragtaraspo or Paitirasp ^ . 



Durasrob . 
Nayazem . 
Vaedislit . 
Hardrshn . 
Paetirasp . 
Haecatasp . 
Paitirasp . 
Zaratusht . 

Iraj . . 
Haizem . 
Vandast . 
Isbiman . 
Hardar . 
Batir . . 
Hajdasf . 

139. See likewise Windlschmann, Zor. 
Studien, p. 160 ; Spiegel, Eranische 
Alter thumskunde, i. 687 ; de Harlez, 
Avesta traduit, Introd. p. ccxxviii ; 
Justi, Iranisches Namenhuch, p. 

1 Les Prairies d'or, ii. 123, tr. Bar- 
bier de Meynard ; cf. Gottheil, Sefer- 
ences to Zoroaster, p. 34. 

^ Avesta, Yt. 13. 131, Manui-ciera. 

3 Cf . also Dinkart 9. 33. 5. 

i Cf. Avesta, Yt. 13. 114, Caxsni. 

5 Zsp. 13. 6 has Ahurvaldspo. 

6 DIukart, Bk. 7. 2. 3, 70 ; Bd. 32. 
1; "West, Grundriss, ii. 95, SBE. xlvii. 
34, V. 140 ; or Purtardspo, Zsp. 13. 6, 
op. cit. p. 139. 


Zoroaster's grandfather on the maternal side, according to 
Dk. 7. 2. 3 and Bd. 32. 10, was Frahim-rvana-zoish or Frahim- 
rava ; his maternal grandmother may have been called Freno 
(Zsp. 13. 1), but the passage is not quite clear. There are several 
allusions to his paternal uncle Arasti and to the latter's son, 
Maidhyoi-maonha, who was Zoroaster's cousin and first disciple 
(Yt. 13. 95 ; Bd. 32. 2 et passim). According to the Selec- 
tions of Zat-sparam, Zoroaster was one of five brothers. The 
passage states : ' Of the four brothers of Zaratiisht the names 
of the two before Zaratiisht were Ratushtar and Rangiishtar, 
and of the two after him Notariga and Nivetish.'^ But in each 
case the reading of the Pahlavi word is uncertain. A tabular 
statement of the Sage's family and kin may now be presented, ^ 

(Freno ?) 

m. FraWm-rvanS-zoish 
(Bd. 32. 10 ; Dk. 
7. 2. 3) 

Dughdhova m. Pourushaspa (Z.'s father) Arasti m. x 

2 elder ZarathusMra 2 younger Maidhyoi-maonha m. x 

brothers brothers | 

(Yt. 13. 106) 

Tradition furthermore states that Zoroaster was thrice mar- 
ried and had several sons and daughters, and that the three 
wives survived him (Bd. 32. 5-7 ; Vjkt. pp. 21-22). The 
names of the first wife and of the second are not preserved,^ but 
the latter is said to have been a widow. By the first, or privi- 

iZsp. 15. 5. "West's translation, 'Urwarwija,' p. 334; Holty, Zoroas<e>- 

8BE. xlvii. 144 ; cf . also 8BE. v. 187, und sein Zeitalter, p. 93, Luneburg, 

note. 1836. "West (SEE. V. 143, n. 1) 

2 Cf. also Justi, Namenhuch, p. 393. refers to the apparent misinterpreta- 

8 See the information and correo- tion which gives the names of Zoro- 

tions given by "West, Pahlavi Texts aster's first two wives as Unij and 

Translated, SEE. v. 142-143, notes, Arnij-baredd ; consult his reference, 

and Justi, Iranisches Namenbuch, s.v. especially as to the second wife. 



leged wife, the Prophet had one son and three daughters. 
Their names are several times mentioned in the Avesta and in 
Pahlavi literature.^ One of the daughters, Pourucista (Ys. 53. 
3), was married to the wise Jamaspa. The son Isatvastra, by 
the second wife, became head of the priestly class and had a 
son, Ururvija, who is also mentioned by name (Bd. 32. 7). 
Isatvastra was likewise made guardian of the children of his 
father's second wife who had borne two sons, Urvatatnara and 
Hvarecithra, to Zoroaster (Yt. 13. 98). These two sons 
were respectively regarded as the head of the agricultural class 
and of the warrior caste. The third wife, Hvovi, was the 
daughter of Frashaoshtra and niece to Jamaspa, attaches to the 
court of Vishtaspa (Yt. 13. 139; 16. 15; Dk. 9. 44. 16; 9. 69. 
58). By Hvovi no earthly children were born, but she is the 
noble consort from whom ultimately are descended the future 
millennial prophets, Ukhshyat-ereta, Ukhshyat-nemah, and the 
Messiah, Saoshyant (Yt. 13. 128). The marvels of this preter- 
natural conception are narrated in detail in Bd. 32. 8-9, cf. Yt. 
13. 62, 128, 141-2, and elsewhere. The later descent from 
Zoroaster's line may thus be tabulated: — 

Children by 
first wife 

CMldren by 
second wife 

Children by 


X m. Isatvastra (son) 
Freni (daughter) 
Thriti (daughter) 
Pourucista (daughter) 

Hvarecithra (son) 
Urvatatnara (son) 

(Not yet born) 

A genealogical tree of the Hvovid family into which the 
Prophet married and into which family he gave a daughter in 
marriage will make clearer some of the connections and alli- 
ances that appear in the Avesta ; it is therefore given on the 
following page : — 

1 Ys. 23. 2, 26. 5 ; Yt. 13. 98, 139 ; Bd. 32. 5 et passim ; Zsp. 23. 11. 


Frata or Parata^ 




Tahmasp ' 
Narlman (al. Asnas) 

Pakhad (al. Pidha?)* Sama Keresaspa 


Hushyaotkna Hvadaena Hvovi 








Summary. — After noticing in this chapter the fact that 
Zoroaster was an Iranian, we briefly followed in outline the 
position of Iran in ancient history. We next saw that the 
oldest form of Zoroaster's name is given as Zarathushtra. 
The statement was then made that we have reason for believ- 
ing that he arose in western Iran (Atropatene and Media) 
about the middle of the seventh century B.C. The scene of 
his ministry is a question that was reserved for later discussion. 
As was shown, a long line of ancestry can be traced out for 
him, and we know something of his immediate family through 
tradition. But we bid adieu to these external matters to deal 
with his life itself. 

1 After Justi, Iran. Namenhuch, p. 

2 Not mentioned in the Avesta. 




yehe zq.Baeca vaxiaeca 
uHatatam nimravanta 
vispA spdnto-ddtA damqn. 

— AvESTA, Yt. 13. 93. 

Intkoduction — Prophecies of the Coming op Zoroastbk, and the Mira- 
ING- TO Tradition — Zoroaster's Youth and Education — Period of 
Religious Preparation — Conclusion 

Introduction, Prophecies of the Coming of Zoroaster. — The 

coming of a prophet or great teacher seenis at times in the 
world's history to be looked for instinctively. We may see 
the truth of this statement exemplified in our own Gospels 
when the disciple asks of the Saviour, 'Art thou he that 
should come, or do we look for another ? ' And when a 
blessed Master is at last recognized, the generations vie with 
each other in repeating how, his advent was foretold. In the 
Zoroastrian scriptures, passages are adduced to show that the 
Sage's coming had been predicted ages before. In the Aves- 
tan Gathas and in Pahlavi literature the soul of the mythical 
primeval bull, three thousand years before the revelation of the 
religion, beholds a vision in heaven of the fravaii or ideal 
image of the prophet Zarathushtra, Zaratiisht, that is to be.^ 
Again, in the golden age of the world, King Yim (Jemshed) 
forewarns the demons of their destined defeat and overthrow 

1 Ys. 29. 8 ; Bd. 4. 4-5 ; cf. Dk. 7. 2. 67. 


at the birth of the glorious manchild.^ Lastly, in the reign of 
the patriarch ruler, Kai Us, three centuries before the actual 
appearance of the hallowed saint, a splendid ox is gifted with 
the power of speech, so as to foretell the promised revelation 
which the future shall receive from the lips of Zaratiisht.^ 

Miracles before His Birth. — From the Avesta we also learn 
that the divine sacerdotal and kingly Glory (hi'ardnah') is 
handed onward from ruler to ruler, and from saint to saint, 
ever with a view to its illumining ultimately the soul of the 
inspired one.^ It is ordained of heaven, moreover, that this 
Glory shall be combined with the Guardian Spirit (^fravaii) 
and the Material Body, so as to produce from this threefold 
union the wonderful child.* 

First, the Glory descends from the presence of Aiiharmazd, 
where it abides in the eternal light; it passes through heaven 
down to earth; and it enters the house where the future Zara- 
tiisht's mother herself is about to be born. Uniting itself with 
her presence it abides in her until she reaches the age of fifteen, 
when she brings forth her own first-born, the prophet of Iran. 
But before this event, as a girl she became so transcendent in 
splendor by reason of the miraculous nimbus of the Glory that 
resided in her, that, at the instigation of the demons, her 
father is convinced that she is bewitched, and he sends her 
away from his home to the country of the Spitamas, in the dis- 
trict of Alak or Arak, to the village of Patiragtaraspo, whose 
son P5riishaspo (Av. Pourushaspa) she marries. The Glory is 
therefore upon earth, ready to appear in the form of man. 
Such at least is the scriptural account found in the Dinkart.^ 

Second, the archangels Vohiiman and Ashavahisht, descend- 
ing from heaven, convey to earth another of the three elements, 

1 Dk. 7. 2. 59-61 ; see West's trans- 7. 14. 1 {8BE. xxxvii. p. 31) ; Dk. 
lation, 8BE. xlvii. 31. 7. 2. 2 seq. ; Zsp. 13. 4 {8BE. xlvii. 

2 Dk. 7. 2. 62-69 ; Zsp. 13. 7-25. pp. 17, 139). 

s Yt. 19. 25-90; of. also West, 8BE. « Dk. 7. 2. 4-11 ; see West, 8BE. 

xlvll. Introd. § 30. xlvii. 18-20. 

* Cf. Spend Nask Summary in Dk. 


the Guardian Spirit (Phi. fravdhar, Av. fravali'), bearing it in 
a stem of the Horn-plant, the height of a man. For a time 
this precious stem is placed in the nest of two birds whose 
young have been devoured by serpents : it protects the brood 
and kills the reptiles. Thus it continues as a talisman in the 
keeping of the birds,^ until required again by the archangels, 
and until Porushaspo (Pourushaspa), who meanwhile had mar- 
ried Duktaub (Dughdhova), meets with the two presiding ser- 
aphim 'in the cattle-pasture of the Spitamas' and receives 
from them the cherished rod, which he gives to his wife to pre- 
serve. ^ Much of all this, it is true, has a mythical ring or an 
allegorical note. 

Third, the Substantial Nature (Phi. gohar'), or material 
essence, which completes the holy triad, is miraculously com- 
bined with the elements of milk, through the agency of water 
and the plants, or through the archangels Khurdat and Murdat. 
The demons vainly seek to destroy this ; ^ but the milk is mixed 
with Hom and is drunk by the future prophet's parents. In 
this roundabout way the Pahlavi text accounts for the com- 
bination of the three elements, the glory, the spirit, and the 
body, and the child is conceived, despite the machinations of 
the demons.* Throughout the narrative the presence of an 
Oriental tendency to symbolism and ritualistic significance is 
manifest. The same story is repeated by the Arab writer 
Shahrastani (a.d. 1086-1153), and it is narrated again in the 

The pregnancy of the mother whose womb is hallowed to 
bear such fruit, is attended by occurrences equally remarkable 
and by circumstances astounding in their nature. These miracu- 
lous occurrences are told and interpreted in the Dinkart, Zat- 

1 Have -we here a reflex of the an- * Dk. 7. 2. 36-72 ; Zsp. 13. 4. 
cient Sanskrit myth of Soma and the ^ Shahrastani, Uebersetzt, Haar- 
Eagle ? brucker, i. 276 seq. ; Gottheil, Befer- 

2 Dk. 7. 2. 22-35. ences to Zoroaster, p. 48 ; Dabistan, 
2 Dk. 7. 2. 44-45. tr. Shea and Troyer, i. 212 seq. 


sparam, and Zartusht Namah, as well as recorded by Shahrastani 
and repeated in the Dabistan.i We at once recall parallels in 
other nations. 

Birth and Childhood of Zoroaster, according to Tradition.— 
The traditional source of information on the subject of the 
birth and early life of the Prophet, was originally the Spend Nask 
of the Avesta, which gave an account of the first ten years of 
Zoroaster's existence. Unfortunately this Nask has been lost ; 
but its substance is worked into the Pahlavi literature, as is 
known from the summaries of the Nasks that we have in 
Pahlavi and in Persian ; ^ and doubtless much of the actual 
material from it is preserved in the Dinkarfc, in the Selections 
of Zat-sparam, and in the Modern Persian Zartusht Namah.^ 
These works stand to Zoroastrianism somewhat as the Lalita 
Vis tar a to Buddhism. The general statements which are made 
in the following pages are based upon them, unless otherwise 
indicated, and the material they contain is supplemented by 
incidental allusions in such writers as Shahrastani or in the 
Dabistan which draw from like sources. 

These accounts of the birth and early life are largely legendary 
and they are colored by fancy. Some of them surpass in 
power of vivid imagination the stories that have gathered 
around Zoroaster's miraculous conception. But that need not 
awaken surprise. Legends have grown up about the birth 
and youthful years of Buddha,* and miraculous incidents are 
connected with the Mosaic Lawgiver. Persia is not behind in 

1 Dk. 7. 2. 53-55 ; Zsp. 14. 1-5 ; ZtN. » Tor translations, see West, SEE. 
tr. Eastwick (^Wilson, Parsi Religion, vols, xxxvii. and xlvil. and Zartusht 
p. 480-3). Namah, tr. by Eastwick in "Wilson, 

2 Dk. 8. 14. 1-2 ; 9. 24. 1-3 ; Pers. Parsi Religion, pp. 475-522. Con- 
Riv. 2. 13; Din-Vijirkart, 18; see West, stant use has been made of these 
Pahlavi Texts translated, in 8BE. translations. 

xxxvii. pp. 31, 226-9,425,444,469; 'See Oldenberg, Buddha, p. 82 

also Shahrastani, Uebersetzt, Haar- seq. (Eng. translation) ; Warren, Bud- 

brucker, i. 276 ; Gottheil, References dhism in Translations, p. 38 seq. 

to Zoroaster, p. 48 ; cf . next note. ' Some have even claimed that Mo- 


In every religion the birth of its founder must be heralded 
by supernatural signs and omens and accompanied by wonders 
and prodigies. A star appears, a comet blazes forth, or the 
earth is shaken. In the Avesta all nature rejoices at Zoroaster's 
birth ; the very trees and rivers share in the universal thrill of 
gladness that shoots through the world ; while Ahriman and the 
terror-stricken demons take flight into the depths of earth. ^ 
His birth, moreover, is in answer to pious prayers addressed by 
his father to Haoma.^ His fitness for the prophetic mission 
which he is to undertake is divinely recognized, and Ahura 
Mazda himself selects this inspired being as his own messenger 
to the world.^ So much for the Avesta. The Pahlavi writings 
also do not tire of recounting how the fiends contended to pre- 
vent his birth ; how a divine light shone round the house ; 
and a shout of joy arose when life triumphed ; and especially 
they recount the loud laughter which burst from the child as 
he came into the world.* The tradition that Zoroaster laughed 
instead of crying at his birth is as old at least as Pliny ; 
it is current in Eastern writers and elsewhere.^ Pliny at the 
same time adds that the child's brain throbbed so violently as 

saic influences ■were at work in the Lord's birth in a cave which is divinely 

Zoroastrian legends. See Kohut, Zo- illuminated. In the Sanskrit Kathd- 

roastrian Legends and their Biblical saritsdgara (i. 325, transl. Tawney), 

Sources in the Independent (N.Y.), the room in which a wonderful child 

March 19, 1891. is born is illuminated by a strange 

1 Yt. 13. 93-94 ; Ys. 9. 15 ; Yt. 17. light. 

19. 5 Dk. 7. 3. 2 and 25 ; Dk. 5. 2. 5 ; 

2 Ys. 9. 12-15; compare what was Zsp. 14. 12 and 16 ; cf. "West, iSBE. 
noted of the Horn-branch above. xlvii. pp. 35, 41, 123, 142, 143 ; ZtN. 

8 Ys. 9. 12-14 ; Yt. 17. 18-20 ; Ys. p. 483 ; ShahrastanI (Haarbrucker, i. 

29. 8 ; Yt. 5. 17-18. 277, Gottheil, References, p. 49) ; Da- 

4 Dk. 8. 14. 2 ; 9. 24. 1-10 (West, bistan, i. p. 219, Mirkhond, tr. Shea, 

SBE. xxxvii. 31, 226-9, 469); and Dk. p. 286. Also Pliny, H.N: 7. 16. 15; 

7. 2. 56-8 ; 5. 2. 2 ; Zsp. 13. 1-3 (West, Scholion to the Platonic Alcibiades; 

8BJE. xlvii. 30, 122, 139); and Shah- Augustine, de Civ. Dei, 21. 14; all 

rastani (Gottheil, References, p. 49). cited below in Appendix V., VI. See 

Other references below. The Apocry- likewise preface to the Icelandic Snorra 

phal N. T. Protoevang. 14. 11-12, and Edda (Jackson, FAOS. xvi. p. ccxxvi. 

I. Infancy, 1. 10, give a legend of our March, 1894. See Appendix VI.). 


to repel the hand laid upon his head — a presage of future 
wisdom ! 

Demons and wizards — for all the opponents of Zoroaster 
are conceived to be such — instinctively now foresee their des- 
tined defeat and ruin and Zoroaster's own glorious ascendency.^ 
They seek accordingly to compass the young child's death. 
They fail in their efforts just as the powers of evil had already 
failed when they strove to prevent his coming into the world. 
The heretical Kavis and Karpans (Phi. Kigs and Karaps), 
who are apparently idolatrous priests,^ are his especial foes. 
The Turanian Karap DurasrSbo (Durasarun, Duransariin) is the 
Herod of the day.^ His wicked partner and villanous accom- 
plice is one Bratrok-resh, whose name is ultimately connected 
with Zoroaster's death when the Prophet was of advanced age.* 
Bratrok-resh is one of five Karap brothers: the names of the 
quintette are given as Brat-rukhsh, Brat-royishn, Brat-resh the 
Tur (or Tiir-i Bratrok-resh), Hazan, and Vadast.^ The name 
of this Bratrok-resh (or Bratar-vakhsh) occurs comparatively 
often in Pahlavi literature at least and it appears under a vari- 
ety of forms. * The machinations of Durasrobo are particu- 
larly violent. It is only the intervention of a divine provi- 
dence that saves the little Zaratiisht, while still an infant in 
the cradle, from having his head crushed in or twisted off by 
this fiendish man, or that wards off a pogniard stroke from the 
same hand which becomes withered as a punishment for its wicked 
attempt.^ Some of the resemblances betAveen this monstrous 
ruler and Pliaraoh or Herod would not be uninteresting to 
trace if there were opportunity. 

1 Vd. 19. 46, and elsewhere. 128(d). Perhaps a descendant of 

^ See West's note in SBE. xlvii. 19. his is referred to. 

8 Dk. 7. 3. 4-41, etc ; cf. Justi, « Zsp. 16. 3 ; cf. Zsp. 17. 1 (West, 

Iranisches Namenbuch, p. 87, ZtN. p. SBE. xlvii. 148. 147). The reading of 

484, and see West, SBE. xlvii. 175 the names is not absolutely certain. 

(Index). 6 See Justi, Namenbuch, p. 71. 

* This would assign to Bratrok-resh ' Dk. 7. 3. 5-6 ; 6. 3, 2 ; Zsp. 15. 

an extraordinary longevity. See p. 2-3 ; ZtN. p. 484 ; Dabistan, i. p. 219. 


The malicioiis Durasrobo, moreover, is even successful for a 
time in making Porushaspo afraid of his own son,^ so that he 
does not prevent the machinations of those who are plotting 
against the young child's life. No angel is sent from heaven 
to tell his parents to take the child into another land. Four 
separate attempts at least are made to destroy the babe in spite 
of the mother's watchful alertness. An attempt is made, and 
not without the father's connivance, to burn the infant in a 
huge fire ; but its life is saved by a miracle.^ An endeavor 
is made by the sorcerers to have the babe trampled to death by 
a herd of oxen ; the leading ox stands over the tiny prodigy 
and prevents it from perishing beneath the feet of the herd.* 
The same experiment is repeated with horses ; the babe is res- 
cued in the same marvellous manner.* Even wolves whose 
young have been killed do not harm a hair of the divine child's 
head ; in their very den and lair he is suckled by a sheep.^ 
The lion shall lie down with the lamb! In all these accounts, 
idealization is evidently at work. But after all we may per- 
haps imagine that a rationalistic background of truth possibly 
lies at the basis of each of these hairbreadth escapes of child- 
hood's days magnified by coming ages. The allusion to expo- 
sure to a wolf throws light at least upon the conditions in the 
time at which the accounts were written. 

Zoroaster's Youth and Education. — Before the boy's seventh 
year, his father Piirshasp (as the Zartusht Namah calls him), 
knowing that even the demons and wizards^ had predicted a 
great future for the youth, places the lad under the care of a 
wise and learned man, as the Zartusht Namah narrates.'^ The 

1 Dk. r. 3. 7-8 seq. ; Zsp. 16. 3-4 ; « Dk. 7. 3. 15-19 ; Dk. 6. 2. 4 ; Zsp. 

Dabistan, i. p. 219. 16. 8-11 ; ZtN. pp. 486-7 ; Dab. i. pp. 

' Dk. 7. 3. 9-10 ; Zsp. 16. 7 ; ZtN. 220-221. 

p. 484. ° We may conceive how the false 

3 Dk. 7. 3. 11-12 ; Zsp. 16. 4-5 ; teachers of the pre-Zoroastrian faith 

ZtN. p. 485 ; Dabistan, i. p. 220. were looked upon as devils and necro- 

* Dk. 7. 3. 13-14 ; Zsp. 16. 6-7 ; mancers. 

ZtN. p. 485-6 ; Dab. i. p. 220. ' ZtN. p. 488. See also Dab. i. p. 224. 


venerable teacher's name is then given as Burzin-kurus.^ 
Pliny (S. N. 30. 2. 1) seems to have understood from Hermip- 
pus that the name of Zoroaster's teacher was Aganaces (Azo- 
naces), but the passage is not quite clear. See below, Appen- 
dix V. § 5. 

In connection with the subject of Zoroaster's youthful days, 
it is proper to make passing mention at least of some Syriac 
and Arabic reports which connect his name with Jeremiah (or 
even with Ezra) and which make Zoroaster a pupil of Jere- 
miah, or even go so far as to identify him with Baruch, the lat- 
ter's scribe. 2 These biassed accounts assert that the pupil 
proved treacherous to his master and was cursed by God with 
the affliction of leprosy. These passages are quoted elsewhere ^ 
and the most important are given below in Appendix IV.; it is 
not necessary therefore to cite them here nor to repeat how the 
identification probably arose from an erroneous connection of 
the name Armiah (Jeremiah) with Urmiah (Urumiah), Zoro- 
aster's presumed birthplace ; nor is it necessary to add how the 
name of Zaratusht might become associated with the Hebrew 
sara'ath (^ZaraatJi) 'leprosy,'* especially if Moslem influence 
wished to detract as much as possible from Persia's Sage. 

The narratives given above are about all that we can gather 
in the way of tradition regarding Zoroaster's early youth and 
training. It is to be regretted that we do not know more of 
the moulding forces that were instrumental in forming so cre- 
ative a mind; nor are we clear in every detail as to the condi- 
tions of the society in which he was brought up or in which he 
afterwards labored and taught. The picture which is some- 
times vaguely outlined by the Gathas or dimly suggested in 
the ' Younger Avesta,' or which one gains from a perusal of the 

1 Does this name contain a disguised ' See especially Gottheil, References 
form of Skt. guru, ' exalted teacher ' ? to Zoroaster in Arabic and, Syriac Lit- 
On the form burzin, cf. Justi, Namen- erature (Drisler Classical Studies). 
buck, pp. 74, 490, and add pp. 168, * Cf. Kohut, Zoroastrian Legends, 
499 (Euru, Kurus). the Independent, (N.Y.), March 19, 

2 See Appendix II. pp. 165-166. 1891. 


traditions in PaUavi literature is not altogether a bright one, 
if we are to interpret, as one might interpret, the allusions to 
devil-worship and Daevas (which recall the present Yezidis) 
and the references to the slaughter and maltreatment of the 
kine, a lack of morality, falsehood, oath-breaking, and personal 
impurity. These are among the many things to which Zoroas- 
ter turned his attention when his reformatory work began. 

Tradition goes on to say that even when the lad had attained 
his seventh year,i the inimical Durasrobo and Bratrok-resh still 
continue to connive against him, to harass and assail him. By 
magic practices they endeavor to daunt his spirit, and they even 
attempt to destroy his body by poison. ^ It is evident that the 
real opposition and struggle which was later to arise in the 
Prophet's life between his own faith and the existing religion 
which it supplanted or reformed, is projected into the past and 
conceived of as a case of personal enmity and hatred already 
developed between the two representatives of the creed and the 
youthful Zoroaster. 

If we are to judge at least from the later literature of the 
Pahlavi, black art and magic practices, occult science and 
necromancy were the order of the time. We seem to have a 
sort of background of Doctor Faustus and the Europe of the 
Dark Ages. Even Poriishaspo (Pourushaspa) himself is not 
free from the influence of the two sorcerers Durasrobo and 
Bratrok-resh, with whom he not infrequently associates.^ All 
these misguided persons, especially Durasrobo, are openly rebuked 
by Zaratiisht for their heresy, and are put to confusion by the 
young reformer when they endeavor to argue with him, much 
as Christ at the age of twelve disputes with the doctors in the 
temple, refutes their doctrines and vanquishes his opponents.* 

1 B.C. 653, according to "West's oal- ' Dk. 7. 3. 32-35. 

culations ; see his table below, Ap- * Dk. 7. 3. 34-43 ; Zsp. 17. 1-6 ; 18. 

pendix III. 5-7 ; 19. 8 ; ZtN. pp. 489-90 ; Dab. i. 

2 Dk. 7. 3. 32-33 ; ZtN. pp. 488-9 ; pp. 228-9. 
Dab. i. pp. 226-7. 


The plotting Durasrobo, as a punishment for his wickedness in 
endeavoring to thwart the righteous, comes to a violent end, as 
fearful as it is strange. The circumstances are described in 
the Dinkart and the Zat-sparam Selections.^ Zaratusht is next 
confirmed in the true religious vows by assuming the ' Kusti,' 
or sacred tliread, at the age of fifteen ; ^ and when he attains 
this year of his life the wiles of the fiendish magicians are 
practically brought to naught.^ The age of fifteen years, even 
as early as the Avesta,* is regarded as an ideal age or the age of 
majority. A passage in the Pahlavi texts tells that when Zara- 
tusht attained his fifteenth year^ he and his brothers 'demanded 
a portion from their father, and their portions were allotted out 
by him.'^ As a part of his share Zoroaster chooses a girdle; 
this signifies the sacred girdle of religion which he assumed. 

Period of Religious Preparation; from his Fifteenth to his 
Thirtieth Year. — From his fifteenth year to the age of thirty 
the tradition is more meagre in its details. The period is a 
time not so much of action as it is a time of religious prepara- 
tion. And yet the lapse of these fifteen years is not devoid of 
recorded incident. An occurrence to show Zaratusht's com- 
passionate nature and sympathy for the aged is quoted in the 
Selections of Zat-sparam, and another is cited to illustrate his 
generous disposition by his dealing out fodder, from his father's 
supply, to the beasts of burden of others in a time of famine.' 
The Zartusht Namah substantiates this reputation given to him 
for tender-heartedness and for goodness. ^ 

At the age of twenty the Zat-sparam recounts that ' abandon- 
ing worldly desires and laying hold of righteousness' he de- 
parts from the house of his father and mother and wanders 

iDk. 7. 3. 44-45; Zsp. 19. 7-8; ^ -b.c. 645, according to West; see 

Dab. i. p. 229. Appendix III. below. 

2 The Brahmanical cord of India s Zsp. 20. 1-4 ; "West's translation, 

shows that this investiture was an an- SBE. xlvii. 161. 
cient institution. ^ Zsp. 20. 4-6. 

8 Zsp. 20. 1-2 ; ZtN. p. 490. » ZtN. p. 490, 11. 11-25. 

4 Ys. 9. 5. 


forth, openly inquiring thus : ' Who is most desirous of right- 
eousness and most nourishing the poor ? ' And they spoke 
thus : ' He who is the youngest son of Aurvaito-dih, the Tur.' ^ 
Zoroaster goes ' to that place ' and lends his cooperation in 
serving the poor with food. A further example of his com- 
passion, as the text says, ' not only upon mankind, but also upon 
other creatures,' is given in the same passage. A starving bitch 
who has five puppies is seen by him whose soul is stirred by 
every misery. Zoroaster hastens to bring some bread to her, 
but the creature is dead before he reaches her.^ 

Of a different nature, but none the less characteristic, is an 
incident narrated in the same connection in the chapter. The 
account declares that when he wished to marry, with the 
approval of his parents, and 'his father sought a wife for him,' 
he requested that the bride should show her face before being 
taken in marriage.^ This incident seems to point to an idea of 
social progress and reform in customs that is equally character- 
istic of the modern Parsis.* 

Zoroaster's readiness to learn, moreover, and to profit by 
what is good even in the teachings of the bad is illustrated by 
additional actions. On one occasion, upon inquiring in open 
assembly, what may be accounted as the most favorable for the 
soul, he is told, 'to nourish the poor, to give fodder to cattle, 
to bring firewood to the fire, to pour Hom-juice into water, 
and to worship many demons.'* Zoroaster gives proof of his 
eclectic tendency by performing the first four of these injunc- 
tions as worthy of a righteous man to do ; but demon-worship 
he absolutely denounces. 

There are no other specific details in Pahlavi literature to fill 
up the period from this moment to the coming of the revelation 

1 Quotations from Zsp. 20. 8-9 = Zsp. 20. 10-11, SBE. xlvii. 153. 

(West's translation). It is to be ' Zsp. 20. 12-13. 

noted that the father Aurvaitd-dang * One need only read Dosabhai 

himself, as well as his son (' progeny '), Framji Karaka's History of the Parsis. 

is alluded to in Dk. 7. 4. 7-8, after Zo- « Zsp. 20. 14-16. 
roaster had received the revelation. 


when he was thirty years old. They were undoubtedly the 
years of meditation, reflection, and religious preparation that 
correspond to similar periods of divine communings and philo- 
sophic introspection in other religious teachers. Parallels might 
easily be cited. It is to this period of Zoroaster's life that the 
Scholiast of the Platonic Alcibiades apparently alludes when 
he relates that Zoroaster kept silent for seven years ; ^ and it is 
referred to by Pliny in the statement that for twenty years 
Zoroaster lived in desert places upon cheese.^ According to 
Porphyrins and Dio Chrysostom, he passed his time upon a 
mountain in a natural cave which he had symbolically adorned 
in a manner to represent the world and the heavenly bodies.^ 
The mountain is illuminated by a supernatural fire and splen- 
dor. Lightnings and thunders were about the summit of Sinai 
also, and clouds and thick smoke shrouded its sides, while the 
base of the mountain quaked violently, when the voice of the 
Lord spoke unto Moses.* The Avesta (Vd. 22. 19) mentions 
the ' Forest and the Mountain of the two Holy Communing 
Ones ' — Ahura Mazda and Zarathushtra — where intercourse 
was held between the godhead and his prophetic representative 
upon earth. Kazwinl calls this Iranian Sinai Mount Sabalan ; ^ 
Mirkhond similarly alludes to the mountains about the city of 
Ardabil, and adds a quotation that is evidently drawn from the 
Avestan allusion to the adjoining river Darej.^ A further 

1 Sohol. ad Aloib. p. 122, 5iA tJ r'bv Nymph. 6. 7, Zoipodrrpav airoi/ivh 
Zapod(TTprjv f ■yeyeyop.imv irCiv (Xia-n-TJ- trir-ffKaLov iv rots irXriirlop 6pe(n ttjs U.ep<rl- 
aa.1. ; see below, Appendix V. § 1. Sos. App. V. gives text in full. The 

2 Pliny, 11. 42. 97. A ' desert with passage is of special interest in regard 
a temple for star-gazing' is also men- to the Mithra cult, in which caves and 
tioned by Yakut (vol. iii. p. 487), and mountains played a particular part, 
this desert is called ' the desert of Zar- See Windischmann, Mithra, Abh. f. k. 
dusht, the head of the Magians ' (Got- d. Morg. i. 62, Leipzig, 1857 ; also 
theil, References, p. 47 n.). For the Zor. Stud. p. 312. 

milk diet of Zoroaster, compare also * Exodus xix. 3-18. Cf. also Spie- 

Plutarch, Quaest. Oomiv. i. 1. 1. See gel, EA. i. 697 ; and Darab Sanjana, 

Appendix V. §§ 5, 6, for the quotations. Geiger's Eastern Iranians, ii. 206. 

s Dio Chrysostom, Borysth. Orat. « Gottheil, References, p. 40. 

xxxvi. and Porphyrius de Antra 6 Mirkhond, History of Persia, tr. 


suggestion on the localization is offered below. Magian wor- 
ship on tlie high mountains is familiar from the time of Herod- 
otus (1. 131 seq.) onward.i 

This time of early retirement and seclusion must have been 
the period in which Zoroaster fought out the fight that raged 
in his own bosom and in which he began to solve the problem 
of life, the enigma of the world, and the question of belief, as 
his religion solved it. Here he doubtless began also to formu- 
late the first general truths out of which his religious system 
was evolveds/^It is the stillness of the forest or of some lone 
retreat that lifts the soul into communion with nature and 
with God. The long retirement and separation from men, the 
hours of meditation, introspection and abstraction, had brought 
the material frame into complete subjection, no doubt, and had 
lifted the spiritual body into a realm of ecstatic rapture and 
transcendent exaltation which prepared it for prophetic vision. 
At this moment came the Revelation and the first of the seven 
hallowed manifestations which only a soul inspk ed by the fer- 
vor of religious ecstasy was entitled to behold/^ 

Conclusion. — The first few years of the life of Zoroaster are 
represented by a series of miraculous events which tradition 
has fancifully colored. When he becomes of age he retires 
from the world for a number of years which were doubtless 
given to meditation and religious preparation. At thirty the 
Revelation comes, and he enters upon his ministry. 

Shea, p. 286, Zoroaster says ' this vol- 22. 12) ; see Appendix IV. pp. 194, 

ume (the Zend-Avesta) has descended 195, 201. 

to me from the roof of the house i One need only recall Behistan 

which is on that mountain (cf. Vd. ( * Baghastana) 'place of the God- 

19. 4. 11; Bd. 20. 32; 24. 15; Zsp. head.' 





'You long to chase, uncaptured yet, 

The young wild-fire of Shelley's mind, 
And how your Zoroaster met 
His shadow in the garden, find.' 

— Geokoe E. Woodbeekt. 

Inikodtictort Stjrvet — SouKOES OP Information and what we gather 


Ahuka Mazda — Second Vision, Vohu Manah — Scenes and Circum- 
stances OF THE Remaining Visions and Conferences with the Arch- 
angels — The Temptation of Zoroaster — Maidhtoi- maonha, his 
EiRST Disciple — Conclusion 

Introductory Survey. — The quickening spirit is now ready 
to bring forth the first fruit of its long labor. At the age of 
thirty comes the divine light of revelation, and Zoroaster enters 
upon the true pathway of the faith. It is in this year^ that 
the archangel of Good Thought, Vohu Manah, appears unto 
Zarathushtra in a vision and leads his soul in holy trance into 
the presence of God, Ahura Mazda. The year of this first 
inspired revelation is known in the Pahlavi texts as ' the Year 
of the Religion,' and there are numerous allusions here and 
elsewhere to the fact that Zoroaster was thirty years of age at 
the time.2 Parallels for the beginning of his ministry at this 

1 B.C. 630, according to tradition as 2 Dk. 7. 3. 51 . g, 14, 3 . zgp gj i . 

calculated by West, /S£j&. xlvii. In trod. ZtN. p. 490; also Masudi, Prairies 
§ 55, and see Appendix III. below. d' Or, ii. p. 153, tr. Barbier de Mey- 



age are not far to seek. During tlie ten years that follow this 
apocalyptic vision, Zoroaster has seven different conferences 
with Ahura Mazda and the six Amesha Spentas. 

Many events occurred during this time, and a number of 
marvellous incidents are recounted in connection with this 
opening period of his prophetic career, as narrated in the Din- 
kart, Zat-sparam, Zartusht Namah, and elsewhere. His teach- 
ing does not seem at the outset to have met with favor. 
Reforms come slowly and the ground must be prepared. Ten 
years elapsed — years of wandering and struggle, of hope and 
dejection, of trial and temporary despair — before he won his 
first convert. This zealous adherent is his own cousin Maidh- 
yoi-maonha (Phi. Metyo-mah), who is often mentioned in 
the Avesta and other writings. ^ He is a very different char- 
acter from Buddha's traitorous and schismatic cousin Deva- 
datta, and he stands as the St. John of Zoroastrianism. Finally, 
in the twelfth year of the Religion,^ Kavi Vishtaspa (Phi. Kai 
Vishtasp, Mod. Pers. Gushtasp) is converted and becomes the 
Constantine of the Faith — the Raja Bimbisara, if not the 
Asoka, of Buddhism. After the king adopts the Creed, many 
conversions follow, and the Prophet's own family, relatives, 
and friends are frequently referred to in the Avesta and else- 
where as having become faithful adherents and believers. 

All these events have so important a bearing that they must 
be discussed in detail. A sort of synoptic view may be gained 
by gathering together various pieces of the scattered material 
and by combining stray allusions into a connected narrative. 
A consecutive account of the occurrences is therefore here 
attempted, but it must frankly be stated that the exact 

nard ; cf. JA08. xvii. p. 10 ; Schol. to 1, 8, 11 ; Syriac Booh of the Bee (a.d. 

Platonic Alcibiades I, p. 122 (Zw/jod- 1250), p. 81, ed. Budge, in Anecdota 

trrpriv) /tcra \' xpicous i^riyliixaaBai T<fi Oxoniensia, Semitic Series, Oxford, 

/SairiXe? Trjs SXijs (piXoaoiplai ; see Ap- 1886. 

pendix V. § 1 (Plato) below. ^ b.c. 618 of the tradition. West, 

1 Cf. Yt. 13. 95 ; Ys. 61. 19 ; Bd. SBE. xlvii. Introd. § 55, and Appen- 

32. 2; Dk. 9. 44. 19; Zsp. 21. 3; 23. dix III. below. 


sequence of events is sometimes difficult to determine with pre- 
cision. Caution may be used in accepting the results without 
qualification, as they cannot be freed from subjective tenden- 
cies. Nevertheless they represent in general outline the tra- 
dition. So much by way of introduction. 

Sources of Information and what we gather from them. — 
The sources from which we obtain material to fill up the first 
period after the Revelation, the ten or twelve years that 
elapsed until the meeting between Zoroaster and King Vish- 
taspa, and the latter's conversion, are the same as have already 
been described. But now that we have reached the real 
period of Zarathushtra's prophetic career this material may be 
augmented in a special manner by the Gathas or Zoroastrian 
Psalms. Like the Psalms of David these often indicate situa- 
tions or conditions in a more or less direct manner, so that 
they help very much in drawing inferences. 

From our various sources of information two facts may be 
gathered with certainty: one is, that after receiving the Reve- 
lation Zoroaster wandered about, as the dervishes of Iran still 
wander, going from place to place in search of a fruitful soil 
for his teaching ; the other is, that during this period, like the 
prophets of old, he was inspired from time to time by supernat- 
ural visions and manifestations. The truth of both assertions 
is proved by the Avesta and the Pahlavi texts, and it is sub- 
stantiated by Arabic and Syriac writers.^ 

The Arab writer Tabari, who calls Zoroaster a disciple of 
Jeremiah and speaks of him as a native of Palestine, goes on to 
state in the course of his history that ' he wandered to Adar- 
baijan and preached there the Magian religion; and from there 
he went to Bishtasp (Vishtaspa), who was in Balkh.'^ The 
chronicler Ibn al-Athir (a.d. thirteenth century), who incor- 

1 Among Avestan passages compare * For the full quotation, see Got- 

Ys. 31. 8 ; 43. 5 seq. ; 46. 1 seq. and theil, References, p. 37, and compare 

others to be noted helow in connection also Appendix IV. p. 198 'below, where 

with the Pahlavi and Arabic. comments are made. 


porated much of Tabari into his own work, is able to add that, 
preaching from his sacred book, the Avesta, ' (Zardusht) went 
from Adarbaijan to Faris (Persia) ; but no one understood 
what was in it. Thence he wandered to India and offered it 
(the Avesta) to the princes there. Then he went to China and 
to the Turks, but not one of them would receive him. They 
drove him out from their country. He travelled to Ferghanah, 
but its prince wished to slay him.^ From there he fled and 
came to Bishtasp, son of Lohrasp (Aurvat-aspa), who com- 
manded that he be imprisoned. He suffered imprisonment for 
some time.' 2 This statement like the preceding is more fully 
discussed in Appendix IV. in its relation to the scene of Zoro- 
aster's ministry. Such passages have the value at least of show- 
ing the existence of a tradition to the effect that Zoroaster 
wandered about as an itinerant teacher until fortune led him 
to Vishtaspa. Zoroaster was performing the part of one of 
those Athravan priests to whom the Avesta alludes as ' coming 
from afar. '3 Nor may his wanderings have been fruitless, for 
no doubt the .seed that had been sown in these places did not 
prove barren but sprang up later when Zoroastrianism began 
to spread as the state religion over Iran. 

But to return to Pahlavi literature and to Zoroastrian writ- 
ings. The Zartusht Namah says : ' When Zoroaster attained 
his thirtieth year, he was relieved from danger and his works 
bare fruit. His heart was directed to Iran. He left his place in 
company with some others. Of those, some who were his rela- 
tions accompanied him on this journey.'* On the way the 
party passes through a sea whose waters are lowered by a mir- 
acle so as to allow a free crossing. ^ They travel forward more 

1 Query. Have we here a reminis- * ZtN. p. 490. 

cenoe of AurvaitSrdang the Tur, Dk. 7. « ZtN. p. 490. This would be ap- 

4. 7_i4 ? propi'iate to Lake Urumiah, judging 

2 Gottheil, Meferences, p. 39. from the description given hy Curzon, 
8 Cf. Eugen Wilhelm, Priester und Persia, i. 533-5 ; Spiegel {EA. i. 694) 

Ketzer im alten Eran, in ZDMQ. xliv. suggests Lake Sevan. 


than a montli until they reach the confines of Iran. This day, 
according to the Pahlavi Zat-sparam as well as the Zartusht 
Namah, was the last day 'Aneran of the month Spendarmat 
(February 14-March 20) ' — so precise is tradition. ^ Their des- 
tination, as the Zat-sparam indicates, is the place 'where 
people went from many quarters out to the place of festival 
Q'aSnocdr').'^ The occasion is the celebration of the spring- 
tide festival. It seems to be a sort of annual religious convo- 
cation that they attend. We may remember in this connection 
that Gabriel revealed himself to Mohammed at the celebration 
of Ramadan. Thus Zoroaster, when halting in a plain of a river 
called Aevatak (one of the four branches of the Daitya), 
receives the first premonition and manifestation of what is to 
come. It is a vision of the approach of a victorious army 
headed by his cousin Metyomah coming northwards to join 
^ The Revelation — First Vision — Conference with Ahura 
Mazda. — The auspicious hour is at hand. The archangel 
Vohu Manah (Phi. Vohiiman) is to reveal himself to Zoroaster. 
At dawn on the forty -fifth day of the Prophet's journey, or the 
15th instant (Dadvo-pavan-Mitro) of the month Artavahishto 
(i.e. May 6) of the thirty-first year of the reign of Vishtasp,* 
the Revelation comes. ^ Tradition takes delight in making 
exact statements. The scene where this event occurred is laid 
on the banks of the Daiti (Av. Daitya) — the Jordan of Zoroas- 
trianism — a river in Airan-Vej or Adarbaijan.^ The position 

' Zsp. 21. 1 ; ZtN. pp. 490-1. On * ArtavaWsht corresponds to April 

the correspondence between the month 20-May 19. The day, therefore, would 

Spendarmat and our calendar, see be May 5. On the month, compare 

Darmesteter, Le ZA. i. 33. Darmesteter, Le ZA. i. 33-34. The 

^ Zsp. 21. 1 (West's translation), year would he e.c. 630. See West, 

SBE. xlvii. 155. So also ZtN. pp. iSBE. xlvii. Introd. § 45, and Appen- 

490-91, and Dabistan, 1. p. 230. dix III. below. 

8 Zsp. 21. 2, 3 ; of. Dk. 7. 3. 51. » Zsp. 21. 4 ; 22. 2 ; ZtN. p. 491. 

The Zartusht Namah (p. 491) is more s Dk. 7. 3. 51 ; 8. 60 ; 9. 23 ; Zsp. 

elaborate in its details. Notice also 21. 4, 'the Daitih, because it is the 

the Dabistan, i. pp. 230-1. river of the conference, etc' ; Zsp. 21. 


of this river is discussed below in Appendix IV. p. 211 ; it 
is represented perhaps by the modern Kizel Uzen and its tribu- 
taries, which merges into the Sped River of Adarbaijan. It is 
crossed by Zoroaster at four different depths, or more probably he 
fords four different streams. These crossings symbolically repre- 
sent four different eras in the history of the religion.^ At the 
dawn, therefore, of the day named, as he stands upon the bank of 
the third channel, Aevatak, of the river Daiti, after bringing up 
the holy Horn-water, Zaratiisht suddenly beholds a glorified 
image of the archangel Vohiiman (Good Thought) coming 
toward him from the south, and bearing in his hand a glossy 
staff — ' the spiritual twig of the religion (malnog tdk-i deno).^^ 

In a brief space of time, as he reaches the fourth affluent, 
Aiishan-rut, of the good Daiti, the image of Vohuman becomes 
a realization, and a transcendent figure of colossal proportions, 
'nine times as large as a man,' rises before him, reminding us 
somewhat of the great image that arose before Daniel, by the 
side of the river which is Hiddekel.^ Vohiiman opens his lips 
and begins to question the enrapt seer, — this situation is alluded 
to in the Avestan Gathas, — and after bidding him to lay aside 
his ' garment ' (or the vesture of his material body), the seraphic 
messenger leads away his soul in ecstatic trance into the glorious 
and dazzling presence of Aiiharmazd and the Amshaspands.* 

No sooner does Zaratiisht enter this radiant assembly than 
he ceases to behold 'his own shadow upon the ground, on 
account of the great brilliancy of the archangels'; and, as the 
words of the text continue, ' the position of the assembly was in 

13, ' the position of the assemWy was » Dk. 7. 3. 54 ; Zsp. 21. 8-9. Cf. 

in Iran, and in the direction of the Daniel x. 4-21. I am furthermore 

districts on the hanli of the water of the indebted to Dr. Thomas Davidson, 

Daitlh ' (West's translation, SBE. through my friend Mr. William Eoss 

xlvii. 157). Again, ZtN. p. 491. Warren, of New York, for some inter- 

1 Zsp. 21. 6-7 ; ZtN. pp. 491-2 ; Dab. esting hints and suggestions as to 
i. 231-2. Daniel parallels. 

2 Dk. 7. 3. 51-53 ; Zsp. 21. 2, 5, 6 ■• Compare Ys. 43. 5 seq. with Dk. 7. 
(West) ; ZtN. p. 492 ; Dab. i. 232-3. 3. 55 ; Zsp. 21. 9-10. 


Iran, and in the direction of the districts on the bank of the 
water of the Daitih. ' ^ He offers homage to Auharmazd and 
the Amshaspands, saying : ' Homage to Auharmazd, and homage 
to the archangels'; and then, as the passage adds, 'he went 
forward and sat down in the seat of the enquirers.' ^ The door 
of heaven having thus been opened, and the favored of the 
godhead having been ushered in, the first and most important 
of all the conferences is begun. The Supreme Being himself 
presides ; the Prophet is instructed in the great cardinal 
doctrines of the Faith, by the Omniscient Wisdom ; and thrice 
in the same day the beatific vision is repeated.^ Marvellous 
signs are shown unto Zoroaster, and he is initiated into sublime 
secrets by ordeals which symbolize future epochs and crises in 
the history of the Creed.* The circumstances of the first vision 
of God are at least hinted at in the Gathas,^ which makes us 
still more regret the loss of the original Nasks ; but the details 
are elaborated in Pahlavi literature and in Persian Zoroastrian 
writings which are probably based upon the older material.^ 

The Next Two Years — Zoroaster begins Preaching. — On the 
completion of the first conference and Zoroaster's return to 
earth he proceeds to obey Aiiharmazd's command by teaching 
and prophesying, for the next two years, to the ruling heretical 
priests, Kigs and Karaps, or the Kavis and Karpans, so often 
mentioned in the Gathas. These are the ' blind and deaf to 
the Law,' as the commentary describes them. They are the 
accursed band of unbelievers, or, to use the words of one of 
the Gathas, — 

The Kavis and the Karpans have united themselves with power 
For destroying the life of man by their evil deeds ; 

1 Zsp. 21. 13 (West's translation) ; pare also Bahman Yasht 1. 1 seq. 

of. also Dk. 7. 3. 60-61. (West, SBE. v. 191 seq.). 

■^Quotations from Zsp. 21. 14 « £.^. Ys. 31. 8; 48. 8, and cf. 43. 

(West's translation). 5 seq. 

3 Zsp. 21. 21. « Zsp. 21. 15-27 ; ZtN. pp. 492-5 ; 

* Zsp. 21. 15-27 ; ZtN. p. 494. Com- Dah. i. pp. 283-4. 


But their own soul and their religion will make them howl 

When they come where the Bridge of the Accountant hereafter is, 
To be inmates for ever and ever in the House of Falsehood, (i.e. HeU) 1 1 

To these Zoroaster preaches the Mazda-worshipping religion, 
and the necessity of anathematizing the Demons, of glorify- 
ing the Archangels, and practising the next-of-kin marriage 
(xvetukdas) .^ But in vain. 

Zoroaster seeks the Turanian sovereign Aiirvaita-dang, 
■whose son has been mentioned above. This potentate, whom 
the Pahlavi text calls 'scanty-giver,' protects the Missionary, 
but refuses to be converted to the Creed and to follow its 
tenets, while his nobles are ' clamorers for Zaratusht's death.' 
Curses arq heaped upon him as a consequence.^ 

Zaratiisht at the bidding of Aiiharmazd next visits a Karap, 
one Vaedvoisht by name, whom God has blessed with this 
world's goods. He demands from the Karap a hundred youths, 
maidens, and teams of four horses, as a gift for the Almighty. 
An arrogant rebuff greets the Prophet of the Lord, and he flees 
for refuge to Aiiharmazd and receives from him the comforting 
assurance of the fearful punishment by death eternal which 
shall be summarily meted out upon the proud offender for his 
misdeed.* And so also Elijah pronounced the doom of King 
Ahaziah because he recognized not that there is a God in Israel ! 

The fate of this Karap offender recalls some of the anathema 
passages in the Gathas and that visitation of wrath, both here 
and hereafter, which these Psalms call down upon powerful 
and stubborn unbelievers.^ To the same crew as Vaedvoisht 
doubtless belong that creature of Satan, Hunu, if the word is 
a proper name,^ and the infidel Usij, who, like the Karap, is a 

1 Ys. 46. 11 ; cf. also Ys. 32. 12, 15 ; « Ys. 61. 10 ; of. Phi. version. So 
44. 20 ; 48. 10 ; 51. 14. Mills, Zoroastrian Gathas, p. 354-355 ; 

2 Dk. 7. 4. 1-5 ; cf. also West, Justi, in Preuss. Jahrb. Bd. 88, p. 247, 
Grundriss d. iran. Fhilol. ii. 95. 234. Differently, Darmesteter, Le ZA. 

8 Dk. 7. 4. 7-20. i. 334 ; Justi, Iran. Nameribuch, p. 

4 Dk. 7. 4. 24-28. 132, reads HunuUar. 

6 ^.^. Ys. 44. 19. 


representative of heretical priestcraft,^ or again such miscreants 
as the perverse Grehma, Bendva, and Vaepya Kevina, who are 
anathematized in the Zoroastrian Psalms.^ It was unhappy 
incidents hke these and encounters with stiff-necked unbe- 
lievers who stopped their ears and refused to receive the 
healing word of the great Revelation, which the Prophet knew 
he was offering, that led to the embittered outpourings which 
we find in lines of the Gathas. Such rebuffs could not but 
produce times of despondency and distress, an echo of which 
we hear lingering in these Hymns. Zarathushtra more than 
once breaks forth with a cry against such rulers and powerful 
lords who use not their sovereignty for the protection of the 
righteous and for the advancement of virtue. If it were not 
so, he would not thus have found himself a wanderer knowing 
not whither to turn.^ Yet hope is mingled with discouragement, 
and yet again despair with expectation. We next find Zoroas- 
ter a long way off to the south and southeast of Iran in the 
land of Seistan. Consult the Map. 

After failing with Vaedvoisht, Zaratusht receives comfort 
and direction from Aiiharmazd. He takes his pilgrim path 
and missionary road to one 'Parshat,' a ruler whose title is 
given as ' Tora ' (Bull), and who dwells ' at the end of Sagas- 
tan' (Seistan).* This territory borders upon Afghanistan and 
Baliichistan, and by the expression 'end of Sagastan' may be 
meant somewhere in the region of Ghazni.^ A curious story is 

1 Ys. 44. 20 ; cf. PM. version and AkhtyO of Yt. 6. 82, and consult the 

Mills, Zoroastrian Qdthas, pp. 216- references given by Justi, Namenhuch, 

217 ; also Haug, Essays on the Farsis, p. 13a, and Iranische Seligion In 

p. 289 (3d ed.) ; Darmesteter, Le ZA. Preuss. Jahrb. Bd. 88, pp. 245-247. 
i- 294. 8 Compare, for example, the Kam 

2Ys. 32. 12-14; 49. 1-2; 61. 12. nemoi zjim Gatha, Ys. 46. 1 seq., and 

It is not certain, however, that Grehma Geiger in Darab D. P. Sanjana's Zara- 

and Bendva really are proper names. thushtra in the Gathas, pp. 171-175. 
VaSpya Kevina, of evil fame, is called * Dk. 7. 4. 31. 

' the Kal sodomite Akht, the heretic ' So Dr. West (letter), and see his 

of dark existence,' in Dk. 9. 44. 14 ; cf. note on Dk. 7. 4. 31. In this connec- 

Phl. Ys. 50 (61). 12, and compare also tion we may recall a statement of Am- 


now told to show the virtue of Hom-water from the Iranian 
Jordan, or river Daiti (Av. Daitya). With the name Parshat- 
tora we may compare the Avestan Parshat-gau.^ This 
Parshat begs for some of the holy Daitya water. From 
what follows it is evident that Zoroaster must have combined 
with the mission of gospel teaching some claims also to medical 
skill and practice in healing. He first bids Parshat to praise 
righteousness, to curse the demons, and openly to profess the 
Faith. Parshat carries out the former two injunctions, but he 
fails to comply with the third by adopting the Creed. Zara- 
tusht therefore does not fulfil his request, but passes on, and 
by means of the Hom-water which had not been bestowed upon 
the weakling, he cures a four-year-old bull that had lost its 
virile power. ^ The name of Parshat disappears from sight. 

The entire allusion to Seistan is of interest in connection 
with the Prophet's wanderings to remote places and to lands 
far distant from his home. Two facts also are recalled by it : 
first, the territory of Seistan is the place of origin of the 
Kayanian dynasty to which King Vishtaspa belongs; second, the 
scene cannot have been far removed from that seat of stiff-necked 
unbelief, the home of Rustam. Certain it is, that one of Vish- 
taspa's earliest missionary efforts after his own conversion was 
in the direction of this very scene where Zoroaster's earlier 
endeavor had been unsuccessful with Parshat, the Bull, who 
dwelt ' at the end of Sagastan. ' ^ From what comes after, it 
appears that the Prophet now journeyed back, perhaps by a 
round-about way, towards his own home, for we next find him 

mianus Marcellinus, 23. 6. 33, which « Dk. 7. 4. 29-35 (West, SBE. 

associates Zoroaster's name with the xlvii. 57-58). 

northern territory of India — superio- ^ On the propaganda in Seistan, 

ris Indiae ; see Appendix V. § 22, also compare the Pahlavi treatise, ' Won- 

p. 72, n. 3, p. 87, n. 1, and the remarks ders of Sagastan,' referred to by West 

on ' White India ' in Appendix IV. p. in Grundriss d. iran. Philol. ii. 118, 

207, n. 2. and translated for me by Dr. West ; 

1 Yt. 13. 96. 127, and see West's note also the Shah Namah allusions ; see 

in SBE. xlvii. 57 ; of. also Parshat- below, Crusades (Chap. IX.). 
gavo in Dk. 9. 24. 17, SBE. xxxvii. 230. 


in the northwest, in the region to the south of the Caspian. Sea 
(of. Map), proceeding apparently on his way to his native land 
of Adarbaijan. 

Second Vision — Conference with Vohu Manah. — In the seven 
or eight years that follow the first vision of the empyrean 
throne and the first communing with Ormazd, Zoroaster enjoys 
the divine favor of six more conferences individually with the 
six Archangels. We know of these from fragmentary accounts 
of the lost Avestan Nasks, or sacred books, and we have descrip- 
tions of them in Pahlavi literature, especially in the Selections 
of Zat-sparam.i They are attested also in Yasna 43 of the 
Gathas and elsewhere in the Avesta. The interviews, ques- 
tionings, or revelations occur in different places and at different 
times. The period of the ten years from thirty to forty in the 
Prophet's life was a time of great spiritual activity as well as of 
energetic labor. His soul lives partly in the world beyond the 
present ; he sums up within himself the generation of those 
whose young men saw visions and whose old men dreamed 
dreams. As the veil is withdrawn from before his eyes the 
several Archangels appear at different times before his en- 
tranced sight. Each Amshaspand enjoins upon him special 
moral duties and practical obligations including particularly 
the guardian care of material or living things over which they 
preside in the physical world — the animals, fire, metals, earth, 
water, and plants. 

The first of these seraphic manifestations, or the second 
revelation from heaven, is a conference with the archangel 
Vohiiman, or Vohu Manah of the Avesta, who intrusts to the 
Lord's chosen minister the care and keeping of useful animals, 
for Vohu Manah's name, even in the Gathas, is especially 
associated with the protection of the animal kingdom.^ Aecord- 

1 Zsp. 22. 1-13. Add also Dk. 8. Vohu Manah's name with the care of 
14. 2-9 ; ZtN. p. 495-8 ; Dab. i. 232-44. cattle in the Gathas, see Geiger, East- 

2 Zsp. 22. 3-6 ; ZtN. p. 495 ; Dab. em Iranians, transl. Darab D. P. San- 
i. p. 240. And for the association of jana, i. p. xxxv. 


ing to the Selections of Zat-sparam, the scene of this special 
interview granted by Vohuman to Zaratusht, and the giving of 
injunctions to the inspired Seer, is laid in the region of Iran to 
the south of the Caspian Sea or in the Alborz mountains, for 
the text designates it as ' the conference on Hiigar and Aiisind,' 
which are regarded as two peaks of that range.^ 

Third Vision — Conference with Asha Vahishta. — The third 
interview is 'a conference at the Tojan water ';2 this is held 
with the archangel Artavahisht, who enjoins upon Zoroaster 
the care of the Fire and the guardianship of all fires, sacred 
and secular.^ The place where this apparition comes to the 
Prophet is to the south of the Caspian Sea and somewhat to 
the east, if I am right in identifying ' the Tojan water ' with 
the river Tajan (lat. 36-37 ; long. 55-56) — see the key to 
the Map.* This identification would agree well with the 
region of the preceding vision and with the probable situation 
of the following.^ The territory, I believe, is volcanic in its 
character, which would also answer to the kingdom of fire over 
which Asha Vahishta is the presiding genius. 

Fourth Vision — Conference with Khshathra Vairya. — The 
fourth ecstatic trance which is vouchsafed to the Seer brings 
him into the presence of the archangel Shatver (Av. Khshathra 
Vairya), who assigns to him the care and keeping of metals. 
The scene of this manifestation is not absolutely identified. 
The Selections of Zat-sparam call the interview the ' conference 

1 Zsp. 22. 3. Prom the Avesta we * Consult also the maps in J. de 
know that Mount Hukairya (Av. JHu- Morgan, Mission Scientifique en Perse, 
kairya Barazah) is a peak of Hara Cartes, Paris, 1897. Cf. Curzon, Per- 
Berezaiti (the Alborz chain) ; and sia, i. 378, and his map. 

Ausind (Av. Us Hindva) stands in ^l-a. a, note on the passage. West 

the Sea Vourukasha (Caspian Sea). {SEE. xlvii. 161, n. 2) doubtfully sug- 

Compare notes by West, SEE. v. 35, gests the Tejend River ; but if so, that 

and Darmesteter, Le ZA. ii. 584. would be the only instance of a vision 

2 So Zsp. 22. 7 (West's transla- being manifested in territory so far to 
tion). the east. See also my next proposed 

8 Zsp. 22. 7 ; ZtN. p. 496 ; Dab. i. identiflcation, 
p. 241, 


at Sarai (?), a settlement on the Mivan (?).' ^ Dr. West draws 
attention to the fact that his reading of these names is uncertain 
and that he has not identified the places. I should venture to 
suggest that we are stiLL in the South Caspian region, in the 
mountainous territory not far removed from the scene of the 
preceding interview. On the same river Tajan, that has just 
been alluded to, is the town of Sari, to the east of Barfrush 
(see Map), which would correspond to the settlement Sarai of 
the text, especially if there be mines in the neighborhood under 
Khshathra Vairya's dominion. The territory is Mazanderan, 
but we know that Zoroaster, dervish-like, wandered also in the 
country of fiends, demon-worshippers, and wicked unbelievers 
before he met with the one truly righteous king and protector. ^ 
Fifth Vision — Conference with Spenta Armaiti. — For the 
fifth transcendent manifestation we must trace our way over 
various districts and provinces to the region of Lake Caecista 
(mod. Urumiah), or back into Adarbaijan.^ From Zat-sparam 
we know that this interview took place there, because the text 
states, that ' for the occurrence of the fifth questioning, which 
is Spendarmat's, the spirits of the regions, frontiers, stations, 
settlements, and districts, as many as were desirable, have come 
out with Zaratiisht to a conference where there is ' a spring 
which comes out from the Asnavad mountain, and goes into the 
Daitih.'* Mount Asnavad, which is found also in the Avesta 
and is famous likewise as having been the seat of the Giish- 
nasp fire, is unquestionably to be localized in Adarbaijan.* It 
is not to be confused with the ' Mountain of the two Holy Com- 
muning Ones,' described above (p. 34). As a likely identifica- 

1 Zsp. 22. 8 ; see West, 8BE. xlvii. » Zsp. 22. 9 ; ZtN. p. 497 ; Dab. i. 
161, note 4. p. 242. 

2 In offering this conjecture I am * Zsp. 22. 9, West's translation, 
not unmindful of Sarai near Bakti (see ^ j-gr references, see West, SBE. 
Saint-Martin, Nouveau Diet, de Oeog- xlvii. 161, n. 5 ; and Darmesteter, Le 
raphie, v. 668) ; and Sarai near Bols;- ZA. i. 152-154 ; ii. 299, 620 ; of. also 
hara; Sarai in India; and Sarain in Justi, Hdb. der Zendsprache, s.v. 
Adarbaijan ; also Sari near Maraud in asnavat, where an identification with 
UeGoe^eiBibLGeogr. Arab, yi. 91,213. Takht-i Suleiman is mentioned. 


tion I should suggest that the Mountains of Sahend (lat. 37.50; 
long. 46.50 — see Map, square Bb.) would answer the require- 
ments of the text here and elsewhere. Waters from a ' spring ' 
on the mountain side might well flow in the manner described 
by the text if the Daitih be associated with the Kizel tjzen and 
Sped (Sefid), as already proposed (pp. 40-41). 

Sixth Vision — Conference with Haurvatat. — The scene of 
the next hallowed interview is laid at the same place, near 
Lake Urumiah, and it may best be described by using again 
the words of the Zat-sparam itself: ' For the occurrence of the 
sixth questioning, which is Khiirdat's (Av. Haurvatat), the 
spirits of seas and rivers have come with Zaratiisht to a con- 
ference at the Asnavad mountain, and he was told about the 
care and propitiation of water.' ^ Like the preceding inter- 
view the location therefore is Adarbaijan. 

Seventh Vision — Conference with Ameretat. — The seventh 
and last enraptured sight, which completed the Revelation, 
is a vision accompanied by a conference with the guardian 
divinity of the plants, Amiirdat (A v. Ameretat). ^ This is 
not confined to a single spot, but Adarbaijan is the scene. 
To quote the words of tradition, it occurred ' on the precipi- 
tous bank of the Dareja, on the bank of the water of Daitih, 
and different places.'^ The Dareja or Darej is the ancestral 
river of Zoroaster, and it is to be localized in Adarbaijan, as 
discussed above and in Appendix IV. In the same appendix, 
reasons are given for localizing the Daitih (Av. Daitya) in 
Adarbaijan.* Consequently, Zoroaster must gradually have 
found his way back to his home, and the scene of the final 
interview must have been in this territory, although the expres- 
sion ' different places,' applied to the interview with Amiirdat 
would seem to show that the questionings with this archangel 
were not confined to these two sites alone. 

1 Zsp. 22. 11 (West's translation), » Zsp. 22. 12, "West, 8BE. xlvii. 
and cf. ZtN. p. 497 ; Dab. i. p. 242. 162. 

2 Zsp. 22. 12 ; ZtN. p. 497 ; Dab. i. * See also above, pp. 40-41. 
p. 243. 


Other Spiritual Manifestations. — In these various visions of 
Paradise which are granted to Zoroaster, and which rival the 
seven heavens of Mohammed, the Prophet becomes quite well 
acquainted with the empyrean realms and with the celestial 
hierarchy of God, the angels, and archangels.^ The tendency 
to visionary trance is further manifested by the apparition of 
Haoma, which rises before Zarathushtra at the altar, as 
described in tlie Avesta (Ys. 9. 1).^ The Pahlavi commentary 
on this passage adds that Zoroaster at once recognized Hom 
'because he had had conferences with most of the angels 
(Izads) and he was acquainted with them.'^ The same idea of 
heavenly visitations is implied elsewhere in the Avesta, for 
example, where Ashi Vanuhi is conceived of as conversing 
with Zarathushtra.* 

To Summarize the Seven Visions. — At the age of thirty 
Zoroaster receives a revelation, and during the next ten years 
he beholds seven visions of Ormazd and the Archangels. In 
Zoroastrian literature there are several allusions to these mani- 
festations. A chapter in the Selections of Zat-sparam describes 
the conferences with most detail. Its account implies that the 
visions occurred during the winters — a time when the Prophet 
perhaps chose to rest from his itinerant labors, like Buddha 
during the rainy season. The particular paragraph referring 
to this point is worth quoting. It runs: ' The seven questions 
are explained within the length of these winters, which are of 
five months, and within ten years.' ^ As to scene, the text says, 
at the outset, that ' the seven questions, with reference to reli- 
gion, of the seven archangels, occurred in seven places.'^ If 

1 In this connection, attention might, lines of Shelley, Prometheus Unbound, 
perhaps, he drawn to the chapter on 1. 1. 198-201. 

the Yazatas (Izads) in the Great Ira- s See Darmesteter, ZA. translated 

nian Biindahishn, translated by Dar- (2 ed.) in SBE. iv. 258, and also Le 

mesteter, Le ZA. ii. 305-22 ; cf. "West, ZA. iii. 29. 

Qrundriss d. iran. Philol. ii. 102 (par. ' Yt. 17. 15-21. 

35). 6 Zsp. 22. 13 (West's tr.). 

2 I"or a poet's view of Zoroaster's « zgp. 22. 1 (West's tr.). 
spiritual visions, we might recall the 


we follow tradition, the scenes of five of the visions, namely, 
the first, second, fifth, sixth, and seventh, are certainly to he 
localized in the west of Iran, in Adarbaijan and the southern 
Caspian territory. If the identification, suggested above, of 
Tojan and of Sarai be correct, the place of the third and of the 
fourth conferences likewise is directly to the south of the Cas- 
pian Sea. Media Atropatene and Media Rhagiana may there- 
fore be regarded, on the basis of tradition at least, as the place 
of Zoroaster's apocalyptic visions of heaven. 

The Temptation of Zoroaster. — The ten years of interviews 
and communings with the Divine Beings are now at an end. 
The Revelation is complete. Zoroaster receives from Ormazd 
some final admonitions, and he carries with him from heaven 
the supreme knowledge contained in the Avesta and also the 
sacred Ahuna Vairya formula — the paternoster of Zoroas- 
trianism. At parting he is warned to guard against the tempta- 
tions of the fiends who will beset his path as he returns among 
men. It is the instant when a weaker spirit might be prone to 
falter, and when a false step would mean ruin and damnation. 
It is the moment when Mara whispered to the newly Enlight- 
ened Buddha, tempting him to enter at once into Nirvana and 
not to give forth to mankind the illumination which he himself 
by so hard a struggle had won. The Powers of Evil now 
gather their forces for a combined attack upon Zarathushtra. 
A description of the Temptation is given both in the Avesta 
and in the Pahlavi writings. The demon Biiiti (Phi. But) is 
sent by Ahriman to deceive and to overthrow the holy messen- 
ger. But Zoroaster is armed with a breastplate of righteous- 
ness and with the spiritual weapons of the Law, as well as 
materially equipped; and he defeats his spiritual enemies and 
puts them to flight. The Avesta pictures the situation as fol- 
lows : — 

' From the region of the north, from the regions of the north, forth 
rushed Anra Mainyu, the deadly, the Demon of Demons. And thus 
howled the maleficent Anra Mainyu, the deadly : " Fiend, rush 


on and kill him," righteous Zarathushtra ! The Fiend rushed 
then along, the demon Buiti, the secret-moving Pestilence, the 

' Zarathushtra recited the Ahuna Vairya, saying : " As the Lord, 
etc." He worshipped the good waters of the good Daitya. He 
recited the creed of the Eeligion of Mazda-worshippers. And away 
rushed the Fiend confounded, the secret-moving Pestilence, the 

'The Piend then howled back to Anra Mainyu : " Thou tormentor, 
Anra Mainyu! I can find no destruction for him — for Spitama 
Zarathushtra. All-glorious is Zarathushtra." IsTow, Zarathushtra 
perceived in his heart, " The fiendish maleficent Demons are plotting 
my destruction." 

' Up started Zarathushtra, forward stepped Zarathushtra, undaunted 
by Evil Thought, by the hardness of his malicious questions, and 
wielding stones in his hand, stones big as a house, having obtained 
them from Ahura Mazda, he the righteous Zarathushtra. 

' "Whereat in this broad, round earth, whose boundaries are far 
distant (asked the Demon), dost thou wield (these stones), thou who 
standest upon the high bank of the river Drej (Dareja), at the abode 
of Pourushaspa ? " 

' And Zarathushtra responded to Anra Mainyu : " maleficent 
Anra Mainyu ! I shall smite the creation of the Demons, I shall 
smite the Nasu (demon of Death), who is created by the Demons. 
(Yea), I shall smite the Enchantress (Pairika Khnathaiti), until the 
Saviour (Saoshyant), the Victorious shall be born from the waters of 
Kasava, from the region of the dawn, from the regions of the 
dawn." ^ 

' Thereupon to him howled back Anra Mainyu, the Lord of Evil 
Creation : " Do not destroy my creatures, righteous Zarathushtra ! 
Thou art the son of Pourushaspa; I was worshipped (?) by thy 
mother. Renounce the good Eeligion of the worshippers of Mazda, 
so as to obtain a boon such as Vadhaghana obtained, the ruler of a 
nation." ^ 

'But Spitama Zarathushtra answered him: "No! I shall not 

1 This is the Messiah that is to spring see Mkh. 57. 25 ; Dat. 72. 5 ; 78. 2 ; Dk. 
from the seed of Zarathushtra ; he is 9. 10. 3 ; 9. 21. 4 ; 7. 2. 64 ; Zsp. 12. 
to he horn in the land of Seistan, the 13 (West, 8BE. xxiv. 103 ; xviii. 217, 
home of the Kayanian royal family. 228 ; xxxvil. 185, 212 ; xlvii. 32, 136). 

2 On the Vatakan tyrant Dahak, 


renounce the good Eeligion of the worshippers of Mazda, not though 
life, and limb, and soul should part asunder." 

' And again to him howled out Anra Mainyu, the Lord of Evil 
Creation : " By whose word wilt thou vanquish, by whose word wilt 
thou withstand, and by what weapon will the good creatures (with- 
stand and vanquish) ^ my creation, who am Anra Mainyu ? " 

' Spitama Zarathushtra answered him : " With the sacred mortar, 
with the sacred cup, with the Word proclaimed by Mazda, with my 
own weapon, and it is the best one. With this word will I vanquish 
with this word will I withstand, with this weapon will the good 
creatures (withstand and vanquish thee), malignant Anra Mainyu ! 
The Good Spirit created these, he created them in the Boundless 
Time ; the Amesha Spentas, the good and wise rulers presented 

' And Zarathushtra recited aloud the Ahuna Vairya.' * 

The Dinkart has a briefer account of the episode ; and the 
Zartusht Namah and Dabistan also allude to the assault of the 
princes of darkness upon Zoroaster as he is returning, and to 
their specious, guileful, and tempting -words.^ This tempta- 
tion, therefore, offers an indirect parallel to that in Buddhism 
and in Christianity. No likeness is familiar in Mohammedan- 
ism nor in the Mosaic system. But besides this, another seduc- 
tive deception awaits the Prophet of Mazda, like the Knight of 
true Holiness encountering Foul Error and Hypocrisy in the 
Faerie Queene, a passage which might be compared. For 
Zoroaster, as forewarned by Auharmazd, is again tempted, this 
time by a Karap who has assumed the feminine form of Spen- 
darmat; but he discovers the disguise and exorcises the fiend 
as described in the Dinkart.* 

Maidhyoi-maonha, the First Convert to the Faith. — We may 
now imagine Zoroaster in this tenth year of the Religion as 
busily engaged in his mission among men. The bugle note of 

1 So, after Darmesteter's construe- « Dk. 7. 4. 36-41 ; ZtN. p. 498 ; 

tion of rmlcdrdtS.mhd. Dab. i. p. 244. 

= Vd. 19. 1-10 ; compare also Dar- * Dk. 7. 4. 54-62 ; see West's trans- 

mesteter's translation in 8BE. iv. 208 lation. 
seq. (2 ed.). 


success is sounded even though the full triumph and victory is 
still to be delayed for two years more. Yet only one convert 
has been made ; but the conversion is important ; it is Zara- 
thushtra's own cousin Maidhyoi-maonha (Phi. Metyo-mah) 
already mentioned (p. 20). The Zat-sparam selection states 
the fact thus : ' On the completion of revelation, that is, at the 
end of the ten years, Metyomah, son of Arastai,i became faith- 
ful to Zaratiisht.'^ The fact is definitely alluded to in the 
Gathas and in the Younger Avesta (which contains lists also 
of later converts, in the Farvadin Yasht),^ and it is noticed in 
other Zoroastrian writings. Quotations are unnecessary. 
Maidhyoi-maonha's being drawn to the new faith and his 
acceptance of the creed is a fulfilment of the promise which 
Zaratusht's first vision gave when he beheld the image of a vic- 
torious army under this leader coming to join him.* The Zat- 
sparam rightly interprets the allegory: 'Metyomah was the 
leader of all mankind who have gone out to the presence of 
Zaratiisht, and he became their guide, so that first Metyomah 
and afterwards the whole material existence are attracted (to 
the faith) . ' ^ The scene of the conversion is laid by the Zat- 
sparam ' in the forest of reedy hollows, which is the haunt of 
swine of the wild-boar species.'^ It would be interesting if 
one could identify the situation. We may henceforth think of 
Maidhyoi-maonha as a sort of St. John the disciple. 

Conclusion. — The first ten years of the Religion have now 
passed ; seven visions have been seen ; the Revelation is com- 
plete ; Zoroaster has withstood the temptation and assaults of 
the Powers of Evil; he has also won his first disciple. And 
yet at this instant, after the exhilaration of success, there 
comes the moment of depression and despondency. We have 

1 See genealogical table in Chap. II. s Ys. 51. 19 ; Yt. 13. 95. 

2 Zsp. 23. 1. According to the tra- * Zsp. 21. 2 ; ZtN. p. 491 ; Dab. i. 
ditlonal dating, the year would be p. 230-1. Cf. p. 40 above. 

B.C. 620. See West, SBE. xlvii. In- ^ zsp. 21.3 (West, ,S.B.&. xWii. 155). 

trod. § 55, and Appendix III. below. « Zsp. 23. 8. 


evidence of this ; for, to quote the words of a Zat-sparam selec- 
tion, 'Afterwards, on having obtained his requests, he came 
back to the conference of Auharmazd, and he spoke thus : " In 
ten years only one man has been attracted by me." ' ^ Ormazd 
answers paradoxically, but the answer seems to have given an 
inspiration, for the efforts of the next two years are unceasing, 
— crucial years as they were, — success attends, the climax is 
reached, the achievement is won. This achievement is the con- 
version of Vishtaspa, the triumph of the Faith, as described in 
the next chapter. 

1 Zsp. 23. 2. 





And het hine gan to />dm cynge and bodian him rihtne geleafan, and he swd 
dyde, and se cing geoyrde to rihtne geleafan. 

— Anglo-Saxon Chkonicle. 

Intkoduction — Zoroaster seeks Vishtaspa — Meeting between Zara- 


Conspiracy against him ; his Imprisonment — The Episode op the 
Black Horse — Complete Conversion op Vishtasp — Coming of the 
Archangels — Vishtasp's Vision — Conclusion 

Introduction. — The eleventh and twelfth years of the Reli- 
gion are stirring years in the Prophet's life ; ^ they are years of 
struggle, bitter trial, temporary disappointment, but of final 
triumph ; they are the two years devoted to the conversion of 
Vishtaspa ; and when success finally crowns the effort, they 
form the great climax in Zoroaster's career. A firm and power- 
ful hand is henceforth to uphold the Faith. The events, inci- 
dents, and occurrences, which are recorded by tradition in con- 
nection with this important era are presented here in detail; 
and the words of the texts themselves are employed, as far as 
possible in narrating them. In order truly to appreciate the 
spirit of the situation one should call to mind descriptions of 
similar conversions in the history of the world's great religions. 

Zoroaster seeks Vishtaspa. — As already noted, an inspira- 

1 B.C. 619-618, according to the tra- xlvii. Introd. § 55, and Appendix III. 
ditional chronology ; see West, SBE. below. 



tioii seems to have come to Zoroaster that he should turn to 
the court of Vishtaspa. The Younger Avesta tells how he 
prayed to Ardvi Sura, the goddess of waters, that he might 
win Vishtaspa to the Faith. ^ Vishtaspa is a king or princely 
ruler, but he and his court are represented as having been 
wrapt in the toils of evil religious influence and fettered by the 
false belief that was rife in the land. The picture which the 
Zoroastrian texts give is naturally a distorted one, colored by 
religious prejudice and animosity; but doubtless its darkness is 
not without reason. Everything is portrayed as bound by base 
superstition, or under the thrall of dread magic. There is the 
stifling atmosphere of the dark ages of the Atharva Veda that 
was still hanging like a pall over the cousin-land of India. 
Iran or the court of Vishtasp is dominated by scheming and 
unscrupulous priests, the Kigs and Karaps, or Kavis and Kar- 
pans of the Avesta. Especially powerful among these is one 
Zak — a name that seems to occur only in the Dlnkart, and his 
ill reputation has destined him otherwise for oblivion. The 
Dinkart gives a number of interesting particulars on the sub- 
ject, which are translated by West, and are worth quoting in 
part. ' Zaratusht became aware from revelation about the vile- 
ness and perverted religion of Zak of the deadly Karaps of 
Vishtasp and many other Kais and Karaps who were at the 
residence of Vishtasp.' ^ Accordingly, 'after the continuance 
of the last questioning of the ten years of conference [he took] 
his departure alone, by the advice and command of Auharmazd, 
to the residence of Vishtasp and the precinct of that terrible 

The Shikand-giimanik-Vijar, 10. 64-66 also adds that ' Zara- 
tusht came alone on a true mission, to the lofty portal of Kai 
Gushtasp, and the religion was taught by him, with a powerful 
tongue, to Kai Gushtasp and the learned, through the speech 
of wisdom, through manual gestures, through definite words, 

1 Yt. 6. 105. ' r»k. 7. 4. 65. 

2 Dk. 7. 4. 64. 


through explanation of many doubts, and through the presen- 
tation of the visible testimony of the archangels, together with 
many miracles.'^ 

The Dinkart speaks several times of the ' residence,' ' lofty 
residence,' ' abode,' ' capital or metropolis ' of Vishtasp, but it 
does not make clear where this was located. ^ Neither does the 
Avesta nor any known Pahlavi text make a precise and definite 
statement. But the later tradition, Persian and Arabic, persist- 
ently maintains that the city of Balkh was the scene of the 
conversion. A full discussion of this question is given below 
in Appendix IV., so it is omitted here. It must be remembered 
therefore when 'Balkh' is mentioned hereafter it is used 
because the name stands in the particular connection or source 
from which the material in question is being drawn ; a final 
judgment on the matter is avoided for the present. 

It is at this juncture that a curious legend is narrated of a 
strange incident which happened as Zoroaster was on his way to 
Vishtasp (Gushtasp). The modern Persian Dabistan, basing 
its statement upon the authority of a priest who quoted from 
an old treatise, recounts how two infidel rulers were punished 
for refusing to adopt the Faith at the holy bidding of the 
Prophet as he was proceeding to interview the great king. 
The selection reads : ' The Mobed SurQsh, the Yazdanian, has 

1 West, SEE. xxiv. 170-1. Whether the two words are used in- 

2Dk. 7. 4. 64, 65, 75, 76, 77, 84; differently, or whether habd rather 

6. 2 (= SBE. xlvii. pp. 64 6is, 67, 68 means " the city," and man, " thepal- 

6is, 70, 74) ; 8. 11. 3 ; in the Shik. Gum. ace," is uncertain. There is no hint 

Vij. 10. 64, transl.' lofty portal '(West, in Dk. as to where this capital, or 

SBE. xxiv. 170). Dr. West (Aug. 2, residence, was.' Furthermore (Jan. 

1897) writes me : ' In Dk. 7. 4. 64, 65, 7, 1898), 'Dk. 7. 4. 76, " lofty resi- 

the word translated " capital " in the dence " = huland mdnishno, where 

Grundriss, and " residence " in SSE. huland may mean " high " either in po- 

vol. xlvii. is 6o6a (=da)- Pers.). Asa sition or character; "tall, exalted, 

mint-mark on coins it is understood to or eminent."' If ' lofty residence ' 

mean "the capital, or metropolis." It or 'capital' should perhaps signify 

also occurs Dk. 8. 11. 3 {SBE. xxxvii. Balkh, we might compare Shelley's 

24). The word man, " abode," "house," 'that high capital,' meaning Rome, 
is also used in 7. 4. 75, 76, 77, etc. 


been heard to say, "It is recorded in the treatise of Mihin 
Fariish that, according to the doctors of the pure faith, when 
Zardusht had thus obtained the victory over the demons, and 
vfas proceeding to an interview with the great King Gushtasp, 
there happened to be two oppressive and infidel kings in his 
road ; these Zardusht invited to adopt the pure faith and turn 
away from their evil practices ; but they heeded not his words ; 
he therefore prayed to God, and there began to blow a mighty 
wind, which lifted up these two kings on high and kept them 
suspended in the air ; the people who came around were aston- 
ished on beholding this sight ; the birds also from every quarter 
of the sky flocked around the two kings, and with beaks and 
talons tore off their flesh until the bones fell to the ground." ' ^ 
The legend has a weird picturesqueness, to say the least ! 

Meeting between Zaratusht and Vishtasp. — If we under- 
stand the Dinkart text aright, the moment of the first meeting 
between Zaratusht and Vishtasp 'must have been when the king 
was on the race-course (Phi. aspdnvar) -^ the Dinkart paragraph 
speaks of Zoroaster as ' uttering, on the horse-course of Vishtasp, 
a reminder of the power and triumph of Auharmazd over him- 
self, as he invited Vishtasp to the religion of Auharmazd ; and 
with great wisdom Vishtasp heard the words of Zaratusht, on 
account of his own complete mindfulness, and would have 
asked for an outpouring of- prophecy. But thereupon — before 
the words of Zaratusht (were fully) heard by him, and he could 
have understood the character of Zaratusht — owing to the 
demonizing of the deadly Zak and the rest of those Kigs and 
Karaps, spoken out with slanderous knowledge and perverse 

1 Dabistan, tr. by Shea and Troyer, cover wbere it is. I am doubtful, 
i. 244-245. A kindred idea perhaps is however, if a town be meant by the 
contained in Dk. 7. 4. 82 end. words : Madam Aspdnvar-i Vishtaspo. 

2 Dk. 7. 4. 66. In answer to an I should be more inclined to read as- 
inquiry if, possibly, a town might be paJchvur for aspdkhvur, "a horse- 
intended, Dr. Westsays (Jan. 7, 1898), stable."' In the latter case, one 
' There is a town Asbanbur, or Asfan- might think perhaps of the story of 
bur, but I have not been able to dis- healing the black horse of Vishtasp. 


actions to Vislitasp about Zaratusht, there then (occurred) his 
consignment of Zaratusht to confinement and punishment.'^ 

In the Zartusht Namah^ the scene of the conversion is laid in 
Balkh, where Vishtasp's father, the old king Lohrasp (Av. 
Aurvat-aspa) is generally stated to have lived in retirement 
after his abdication. Masiidi (d. a.d. 957) also makes it Balkh, 
and his testimony is nearly three hundred years earlier than the 
Zartusht Namah.^ The Shah Namah (a.d. 1000) does not 
make the assertion explicitly in so many words, but it lays all 
the following scenes at Balkh, as discussed below (Appendix 
IV. p. 214).* The Cangranghacah Namah likewise lays the 
scene of the rival Brahman's conversion at Balkh. ^ 

The later tradition adds details and embellishes the account. 
According to the Zartusht Namah, King Vishtasp (Gushtasp) 
was seated in royal estate in his palace when Ormazd's apostle 
appeared. 8 According to Mohammedan writers, Kazwini and 
Ibn al-Athir, Zoroaster enters the assembly in no ordinary 
manner, but by a miracle : the roof parts asunder to give 
entrance to his hallowed person.'' Ibn al-Athir also adds, that 
' in his hand was a cube of fire with which he played without its 
hurting him.' The scene might make a subject for a painting. 
We must remember, furthermore, that Zoroaster originally 
sprang from the country of naphtha wells ; moreover, he may 
not have been wholly unacquainted with effects produced by 
chemical experiments if we may judge from accounts of the 
scientific knowledge attributed to him.^ The Shah Namah 

1 Dk. 7. 4. 66-67 (West's transla^ of these writers iDelong to the thir- 
tion). Cf. also Dk. 7. 5. 6. teenth century of our era. Mirkhond 

2 ZtN. pp. 498-499. {History, tr. Shea, p. 287) repeats Ibn 
8 See Masudi's statement in Appen- al-AtWr's story of the wonderful fire. 

dix IV. p. 199. Recall also classical allusions to the 

* Compare Mohl, Livre des Bois, fire. The reference is evidently to the 

trad. iv. 290, 291, 298, 300. Burhzin Mitro fire described below. 

5 See summary by Anquetil du Per- « E.g. in the Nasks, see Chap. VIII. 
ron, 1. part. 2, p. 50. below, pp. 95-96 ; cf. also Dk. 7. 5. 8- 

6 ZtN. pp. 498-499. 10, and also the classical statements on 
' Gottheil, References, p. 40. Both p. 8 and in Appendix V. 


similarly alludes to the censer or basin of fire which he brought 
from Paradise to present to the King.i In these fire references 
there seems to linger a reminiscence of the Biirzhin Mitro fire, 
shortly to be referred to. Kazwini apparently draws from some 
traditional source or Pahlavi text when he describes an ordeal 
of molten metal to which Zoroaster has to submit his person to 
prove the divine truth of his mission. ^ This is at least in 
harmony with ' the achievement of ordeal ' referred to in the 
Dinkart as instituted or sanctioned by Zaratiisht who is there 
cited as giving authority for thirty -three kinds of this judicial 
test.^ This very achievement of Zoroaster forms the prototype 
of a fiery ordeal undergone by one of his future apostles in 
Sassanian times, and of the usage of the ordeal in the religion. 

Zaratusht disputes with the Wise Men. — There is evidence 
enough to show that the Prophet had to win his way step by 
step during these two years of struggle and probation ; and 
there is no doubt that he at once encountered the antagonism 
and vigorous opposition of the wise men of the king's court. 
According to tradition at least, there were not wanting those to 
plot against him. 

' The Kavigs and Karaps,' says the Zat-sparam, ' in the manner 
of opponents propounded thirty-three inquiries to him, so that 
by command of Vishtasp he became the explainer of those 
thirty-three inquiries.'* This and the later debates are alluded 
to in the Dinkart and elsewhere as ' the terrible conflict,' ' the 
terrible combat,' ' the great session,' ' the controversy about the 
religion with the famous learned of the realm ' who were Zoro- 
aster's 'fellow-disputants.'^ The Zartusht Namah, drawing 
upon some source not now accessible, or supplying material from 
imagination, graphically describes the scene with Eastern pomp 

1 I.e. mijmar-i ataS, ShN. ed. Vul- p. 41 ; Mirkhond, History, tr. Shea, p. 
lers-Landauer, iii. 1498 ; Mohl tr. iv. 287. 

290. On the amulet chain given to = Dk. 7. 5. 4-5 (West, SHE.). 

Isfendlar, see p. 67, note 6. * Zsp. 33. 5. 

2 Kazwini, ed. Wustenfeld, ii. 267 ; ^ Dk. 7. 4. 65, 69, 70, 73 ; 5. 2. 10 ; 
cf. Gottheil, Beferences to Zoroaster, Zsp. 23. 5. 


and Oriental detail.^ The sages of Vishtasp are seated in grave 
council to dispute with the new-comer and stranger, with the 
herald of Ormazd. The debate and controversy lasts no less 
than three days.^ The Priest of the Zend-Avesta comes off 
triumphant at every point. ^ He claims the office of Prophet 
and begins to recite the sacred texts to the king.* 

Conspiracy against Zoroaster ; his Imprisonment. — Vishtasp's 
interest is aroused, and the divine Seer seems to have produced 
a marked effect by being able through his prescience, as the 
story goes, openly to disclose and tell the thoughts of the king 
and of others, with astonishing results.^ A plot, however, is 
concocted by those whose light the brilliancy of the new lumi- 
nary has dimmed. The priests who are supplanted in influence 
enter into a conspiracy, like those who sought to find occasion 
against Daniel, and they intrigue for Zoroaster's death. ^ By 
suborning the porter of his lodging, as the tale relates, these 
wicked schemers succeed in hiding vile material within the holy 
man's apartments so that it may be used as evidence against him. 
The hair, nails, heads, of cats and dogs, together with various 
other paraphernalia of witchcraft and sorcery, are thus slipped 
in. On this false evidence Zoroaster is accused of being a 
wizard and necromancer ; he is thrown into prison and is left 
to starve. Such is the account of the Zartusht Namah, and the 
Pahlavi Dinkart alludes to the circumstance as well.^ 

The Episode of the Black Horse. — A miracle releases Zardusht. 
It is the miracle which he wrought by restoring to health the 
king's Black Horse, as described with great elaboration in the 
Zartusht Namah and incidentally referred to in the Dinkart. ^ 
The king has a favorite black horse.^ Upon the imprisonment 

1 ZtN. pp. 499-501 ; repeated also in * ZtN. p. 501 ; Dab. i. pp. 249-250. 
the Dabistan, i. pp. 245-250. ^ jy\^ >j_ 4_ 71 . 5 2. 8. 

2 ZtN. p. 501. 6 ZtN. p. 503 seq. repeated in Dab. i. 
' One is somewhat reminded of the p. 251. 

questionings of the scribes and Phar- ' Dk. 7. 4. 64, 67 ; 7. 5. 6. 

isees, if not of Luther's disquisi- « ZtN. pp. 504-509 ; Dk. 7. 4. 70. 

tions. 9 Apparently named Bahzad (well- 


of Ormazd's minister tlie animal's four legs are suddenly drawn 
up into its belly and the creature is unable to move. This 
occurrence is plainly a manifestation of the divine displeasure. 
In his dungeon cell Zardusht hears of what has happened. He 
offers, if released, to restore the horse to its former soundness ; 
but he will do this only upon the fulfilment of specific conditions. 
These the king must agree to beforehand. Vishtasp is over- 
joyed and promises to grant the Priest a boon for each foot of 
the charger that is restored to its proper state. The details 
which follow seem ludicrous, but such descriptions of cunning 
practices are not unique. Hocus-pocus has been employed else- 
where, and the situation doubtless had its parallels in other 
courts of Eastern despots in ancient days. We must not forget 
that even when St. Augustine preached Christianity to ^thel- 
bert of England, it was in the open air, owing to the king's 
dread of witchcraft which might exercise a spell upon him if he 
were within four walls ! 

The first condition which Zardusht makes, is that Vishtasp 
shall accept the Faith if one foot of the horse be restored. 
Upon the king's agreeing to this stipulation, and in answer to the 
Prophet's earnest prayer, ' the right fore-leg of the horse came 
out, since the word of the Shah was true.'^ Before the 'man 
of God ' will grant the second boon, however, the king must 
promise that his own warlike son Isfendiar (Av. Spento-data, 
Phi. Spend-dat) shall fight as a crusader in support of the true 
Faith. Thereupon, ' the right hind-leg of the steed comes out 
by the commandment of God.' The third condition results 
in the granting of a wished-for favor, the privilege of convert- 
ing the queen to the Faith. Upon its fulfilment the descent of 
the third leg is accomplished. The last promise includes the 
revealing of the names of the culprits who had bribed the 
bred) in the Shah Namah (Mohl, tr. p. 360 (Wehzat) , for other horses called 
iv. pp. 320, 335), unless this name be a by this name. 

merely typical one like 'Black Beauty' i ZtN. p. 507 (Eastwick's transla- 

in English. Such at least is the tra- tion in Wilson, Parsi Beligion, from 
dition. See also Jiisti, Namenbuch, which the quotations are made). 


doorkeeper and had plotted against the Prophet of the Lord. 
When these are revealed and the offenders appropriately pun- 
ished by death, the horse is fully restored to health and leaps 
up upon his four legs as sound as before. 

This absurd story, which the ZartushtNamah, as just described, 
tells minutely with considerable imagination and poetic embel- 
lishment, receives only brief notice incidentally in the Dinkart, 
when it refers to ' the wonder about the splendid horse of 
Vishtasp,'^ and when in another part of the work, it mentions 
' the splendid horse of Vishtasp ' as the nonpareil of horses.^ 
The episode is seriously recorded, earlier than the Zartusht 
Namah, by Shahrastani (born a.d. 1086), who lived in Khoras- 
san.3 As the author of the Zartusht Namah (a.d. 1277) was 
a native of Rai in the West, it shows how current the story 
was. It is later repeated by Mirkhond.* How different from 
the narrative of Constantine and the Cross ! 

Complete Conversion of Vishtasp. — The conversion of Vish- 
tasp is nearly complete, but he still seeks from Zardusht an 
additional proof, a vision, a manifestation, some sign or token, 
before he will be finally convinced. Inasmuch as he himself has 
freely granted four favors to Zoroaster in acknowledgment of 
his services, the king now himself makes four counter-requests, 
as the narrative tells, before he fully adopts the Faith. The 
Zartusht Namah again relates these in detail, and we can infer 
from incidental allusions in Avestan and Pahlavi texts that the 
tradition was a recognized one.^ The first of these four request 
by Vishtasp is that he may know his final doom and see his 
place in Paradise ; the second, that his body may become invul- 

1 Dk. 7. 4. 70. 6 ZtN. pp. 509-11. Compare the 

2 Dk. 9. 22. 2 (West, SBE. xxxvil. fragmentary Avestau texts Vishtasp 
220) . Yasht, and Afrin Paighambar Zartusht 

' Shahrastani ed. Haarhrticker, i. (Yt. 24 and Yt. 23). Cf. also Dk. 7. 

283 ; of. Gottheil, References, p. 50. 4. 74-82 ; 7. 6. 13 ; Zsp. 23. 7 {8BE. 

For references to Vishtasp's horse xlvii. 67-70, 81, 164) ; Dk. 8. 11. 2-3 

Bahzad, see note on p. 62, above. {SBE. xxxvii. 24). 

* Mirkhond, History, tr. Shea, pp. 


nerable ; the third favor is that he may have universal knowledge, 
knowing the past, present, and future ; and fourth, that his soul 
may not leave his body until the resurrection. The Prophet of 
Ormazd gives assurance that all these requests may be granted ; 
but he shows that such phenomenal privileges when granted 
could not be combined in the person of a single individual. 
The king must choose one boon out of the four. His selection 
is to have permission to behold the place which he shall occupy 
in heaven. 

Coming of the Archangels. — This moment is the occasion of 
the coming of three Amshaspands, or Archangels, from heaven, 
to the palace of the king, as witnesses from AGharmazd to the 
divinely inspired message of Zaratusht. These three heaven- 
sent envoys are Vohiiman, Ashavahisht, and the Propitious 
Fire (Biirzhin-Mitro, or Spenisht, Av. Spenishta).^ In its 
description the Dinkart quotes a passage from ' revelation ' as 
follows: 'Then he who is the creator Auharmazd spoke to 
them, to Vohiimano, Ashavahishto, and also the fire of Aiihar- 
mazd, the propitious, thus : " Proceed ! you who are archangels, 
unto the abode of Vishtasp, whose resources are cattle and who 
is far and widely famed, with a view to his reliance upon this 
religion (that is, till he shall stand up for this religion) ; and, 
as regards the answering words of the righteous Zaratusht of 
the Spitamas, to approve the nature of those words." '^ And, 
as the paragraph continues, the archangels proceeded to the 
abode of Vishtasp in such glorious effulgence that ' their radi- 
ance in that lofty residence seemed to him a heaven of com- 
plete light, owing to their great power and triumph; this was 
so that when he thus looked upon it, the exalted Kai- Vishtasp 
trembled, all his courtiers trembled, all his chieftains were con- 

1 Dk. 7. 4. 75, 78 ; 7. 6. 13 ; Zsp. gers to be four, as it mentions two 
23. 7 ; Dk. 8. 11. 2-3 ; Bd. 17. 1, 8. See fires, Adar Khurdad and Adar Gush- 
also Darmesteter, Le ZA. i. 155. It asp 'beside the two archangels, 
may be noticed that the Zartusht Na- ^ Dk. 7. 4. 75-76 (West's transla^ 
mah makes the number of the messen- tion). 


fused, and he of the superior class was like the driver of a 
chariot-horse.' 1 

The Zartusht Namah colors this part of the account by 
graphically describing these messengers as majestic knights on 
horseback in cavalier style, bristling with armor and clad in 
green.2 The Dinkart goes on to tell how the Fire speaks out 
and reassures the terrified king that they are come, not for 
alarming him as the two envoys of his mortal foe Arjasp the 
Khyon later would do, but that they are come with a bidding 
from heaven that he should receive the religion of Zaratusht. 
In that event they promise him a long reign and a life of one 
hundred and fifty years(!), accompanied by many blessings 
and exalted by an immortal son Peshyotan (Av. Peshotanu). 
On the contrary, if he will not accept the holy Faith, they 
threaten that his end will soon ensue. And the Archangels 
thereupon took up their abode with Vishtasp.^ 

Vishtasp's Vision. — It was after this stirring occurrence and 
after the obedient Vishtasp had received the Creed, that a 
glimpse of Paradise and a spiritual revelation of his trium- 
phant success in life is vouchsafed to him. In referring to this 
the Dinkart says: 'For the sake of daily* and visibly showing 
to Vishtasp the certified victory over Arjasp and the Khyons, 
and his own superior position, unceasing rule, splendor, and 
glory, the creator Aiiharmazd sends, at the same time, the 
angel Neryosang to the abode of Vishtasp, as a reminder for the 
archangel Ashavahishto to give to Vishtasp to drink of that 
fountain of life, for looking into the existence of the spirits, 
the enlightening food by means of which great glory and 
beauty are seen by Vishtasp.'^ The king now quaffs an ano- 
dyne draft of ' the fountain of life ' ^ from a fine saucer which 

1 Dk. 7. 4. 76 (West) ; cf. also Dk. < Notice this word. It is also of 
7. 6. 13 ; Zsp. 33. 7. interest in connection with an allusion 

2 ZtN. p. 510 ; repeated by Dab. 1. in Yatkar-I Zarlran, § 12, and with the 
p. 257. Holy Wars (Chap. IX.). 

8 Dk. 7. 4. 77-82 ; and Dk. 8. 11. 3 ^ Dk. 7. 4. 84 (West's transl.). 

(iSB^. xxxvii. 24). 6 Dk. 7. 4. 84-85. 


is proffered to him by Ashavahishto ; ^ and at his instigation 
the queen also accepts the Faith. ^ The Zartusht Namah^ com- 
pletes the picture by describing how the king's son Peshotan 
(Bashiitan) receives from the Prophet's hand a cup of milk 
which he drains and becomes undying until the resurrection.* 
The grand vizir, Jamasp, inhales some magic perfumes and 
becomes endowed with universal wisdom.® The valiant Isfen- 
diar (Av. Spento-data, Phi. Spend-dat) partakes of a pome- 
granate, and his body is made invulnerable, so that he may 
fight the good fight of the Faith. ^ Thus are bestowed the four 
great boons which were asked by Vishtasp. 

Conclusion. — In reviewing the accounts of the conversion of 
Kavi Vishtaspa one can but feel convinced of the reality of the 
event. It is not easy, however, to decide how much may be 
actual fact and how much is fiction in the stories that are told. 
Nor is it easy to determine of how early or how late origin 
some of these stories are. Several of them appear to be hinted 
at in younger portions of the Avesta ; they hardly would occur 
in the existing Gathas, for the nature of those Psalms would 
rather preclude them. Some of them seem to be built up on 
the basis of old allusions which have been interpreted to suit a 
situation. Several of them strike us to-day as silly, but a num- 
ber of them as picturesque and as tinged with Oriental fancy. 

Nevertheless, amid all the dross, grains of gold are undoubt- 
edly to be found ; and beneath the blaze of tinsel and the glare 

1 So Dk. , but by Zardusht, accord- books, and the later -writings. Com- 
ing to the Zartusht Namah, p. 511. pare also the Pahlavi treatise, Jamasp 

2 Dk. 7. 4. 86. Namak, noted by West in Qrundriss 
8 ZtN. p. 511 ; repeated in Dab. i. d. iran. Philol. ii. 110. 

pp. 259-260. ^ In the Shah Namah this quality 

* In connection with this incident, is conferred by means of an amulet 
compare also the paragraph on Peshyo- chain (kusti ?) which Zardusht is sup- 
tan in Dk. 7. 5. 12 (West, SBE. xlvii. posed to have brought from heaven, 
77). Inthe Avesta, and in Pahlavi writ- of. p. 61, note 1, above. See Mohl, tr. 
ings, Peshotanu is always spoken of as Iv. 407, and of. Spiegel, in Darab D. P. 
immortal. Sanjana, Oeiger's Eastern Iranians, 

* This is the character of ' the wise ii. 211. 
Jamasp' in the Avesta, the Pahlavi 


of gaudy coloring, a sober shade of truth may be recognized. 
Other nations and other generations have sought for a sign; 
the Zoroastrian writings are not the only texts that relate mir- 
acles. An Eastern ruler in ancient days may not have been 
insensible to influences which were of a cajoling character. 
And as for the intrigues against Zoroaster, his imprisonment 
and his release, we know that court jealousies and priestly con- 
spiracies against a powerful rival have not been confined to 
Iran. Fanciful stories of a bewitched horse may likewise be 
found elsewhere. Banks and his horse, in Shakspere's day, 
would be an illustration. The conversion also of the queen of 
the realm opened many another door to influence, as did Emma 
to St. Augustine. Perhaps Hutaosa was early interested in 
Zoroaster's preaching. It suffices to say that even if the 
actual circumstances connected with the momentous event of 
Vishtasp's conversion were not wholly as tradition later repre- 
sents them, they might at least have been such or similar. 
Voild tout! The triumph of the Prophet is supreme. 




Ccepere plures quotidie ad audiendum verbum confluere. 

— Beda, Hist. Eccl. 1. 26. 

ENCE OF Vishtaspa's adopting the New Faith — Memeeks or ViSH- 
taspa's Court; Immediate Conversions; Living Personalities in the 
Gathas — Other Members of the Court Circle converted — Con- 

Zoroaster's Patron Vishtaspa. — Kavi Vishtaspa, or King 
Vishtasp (Gushtasp), the Constantine of Zoroastrianism and 
defender of the Faith, presents a figure so important in its 
bearing that some additional details may appropriately be 
given concerning this pious ruler's history. His name is ever 
recurring in Avestan and Pahlavi texts, in the Shah Namah, 
and in Mohammedan writers who allude to Persia. A collec- 
tion of the references to his name in the Avesta, supplemented 
by general allusions in other Zoroastrian writings, is given at 
the bottom of the page.^ Special points of interest about him 

1 1. The principal A'vestan refer- 6. 98 (a Naotairyan) ; Yt. 5. 105 (Z. 

ences to Vishtaspa are : Gatha, Ys. prays for his conversion) ; Yt. 5. 108- 

28. 7 (a boon to he granted to Vish- 109 (V. prays for victory) ; Yt. 8. 

taspa and Zarathushtra) ; Ys. 46. 14 132 (type of successful conqueror) ; 

(warrior V.) ; Ys. 61. 16 (V. an ideal Yt. 9. 29-32 (of. Yt. 5. 108 ; 17. 49) ; 

ruler in wisdom) ; Ys. 83. 2 (a fol- Yt. 13. 99-100 (hero of the Paith) ; Yt. 

lower of Zarathushtra).— Yasna, 17. 49-52 (cf. Yt. 9. 29-32) ; Yt. 17. 

Ys. 12. 7 (a Zoroastrian) ; Ys. 23. 2 61 (prays to Ashi Vanuhi on the 

and 26. 5 (his fravaH). — Y a s h t, Yt. Daitya) ; Yt. 19. 84-87 (Kingly Glory, 




may be found also in Justi's IraniscJies Namenluch, pp. 372, 
395, together with an elaborate genealogical table which should 
be consulted. An abridged list of Vishtaspa's next-of-kin, 
based upon Justi's table, is appended on the opposite page. 

From this genealogical list we see that the patron of Zara- 
thushtra was the son of Aurvat-aspa (Lohrasp) and was 
sprung from the old Kayanian line of kings. ^ He belongs to 
the Naotairyan family (cf. Av. Naotairya, Naotairyana),^ that 
is, he was descended from an ancestor Naotara (Firdausi's Naud- 
har).3 His wife Hutaosa (Phi. Hiitos), the patroness of Zoro- 
aster, is likewise of the Naotairyan family; * his brother Zairi- 
vairi (Zarer or Zarir), a romantic hero and zealous convert, 
wins lasting fame by his valiant death in battle in the first 
Holy War, as described below. King Vishtaspa is the father 
of many sons and daughters.^ Two of these sons, Spento-data 

defender of the Faith, conqueror) ; 
Yt. 23. 1 seq. (Z.'s blessing upon V.) ; 
Ys. 24. 1 seq. (Vishtasp Nask). 

2. Pahlavi references. The Phi. 
Comment, to Ys. 43. 12 (cf. Ys. 27. 6), 
44. 16, and also Dk. 9. 33. 5, take Vish- 
tasp as a type of religious obedience, as 
representative of Srosh on earth (see 
Darmesteter, Le ZA. i. 200, n. 24, and 
p. 283, n. 40; also his Index, s.v. 
'Sraosha' in iii. 226). In general, 
the more important Pahlavi references, 
and there are many, will be given as 
occasion arises. Consult also the In- 
dexes in West, 8BE. vols. v. xviii. 
xxiv. xxxvii. xlvii. under ' Vishtasp,' 
'Kal Vishtasp.' 

3. Mohammedan references, 
given below as they occur. Consult 
also Gottheil, References, p. (29), 33 
Ms, 34 (35), 37 (unimportant), 39 bis, 
40 bis; also Mirkhond, History, tr. 
Shea, p. 284 (Balkh) ; Albirunl Chro- 
nology, tr. Saohau, pp. 100 seq., 206. 

4. Classical references. The 
more important are given in this chap- 

ter, but consult also Appendix V. 
Mention might here be made likewise 
of the so-called oracular sayings of 
Vishtasp ; cf. Kuhn, Festgruss an B. 
von Roth, p. 217. 

^ Yt. 5. 105, pudrBin yat aurvat- 
aspahe. See also Justi, Iran. Namen- 
buch, p. 183. The question of a change 
of dynasty in the succession is referred 
to in the next note. 

2 For the connection between the 
Kavi dynasty and the Naotairyan clan 
by adoption, see Justl, Iran. Namen- 
buch, p. 372, and "West, SBE. xlvii. 
80, n. 1. 

* Cf. Justl, Iran. Namenbuch, pp. 
226-227. Moreover, on Phi. Notar 
and Rak, see "West, SBE. xlvii. 29, 40, 
44, 80, 147, and Appendix IV., below. 

1 Yt. 15. 35 ; cf. Yt. 13. 139 ; 9. 26 ; 
17. 46. The Pahlavi narrative Yat- 
kar-i Zariran, § 48 (Geiger, p. 59), 
makes HutOs the sister as well as queen 
of Vishtasp, according to Magian prac- 

5 No less than thirty are spoken of in 
















t— ( 














































Hushy aothna 


Spent data — 



. Sheroi (or Ormazd) 

_| f Padhafrah (or Beh-afrid) 
g iHuma 

































r3 TO ^ 
c^ 10 ^ 


izi h 

-^ ice 

f ^ 
-a 3 



(Phi. Spend-dat, Pers. Isfendiar) and Peshotanu, have been 
alluded to already and they will appear again. A daughter 
Huma (Phi. Pers. Humai), renowned for her beauty, is carried 
away, along with her sister Beh-Afrid, into captivity, by 
the king's mortal foe Arjasp; but they both are gallantly 
rescued by their heroic brother Isfendiar, as told in the Shah 

The principal facts which the Avesta emphasizes about Vish- 
taspa are, his conversion, his zealous support of the Creed, and 
his vigorous crusading in behalf of the Faith. It furthermore 
portrays this nonpareil of kings as the very incarnation of reli- 
gious obedience and of priestly ideals ; he is the representative 
of the priest-god Sraosha, whom he typifies on earth ; and he 
will serve as an officiating pontiff at the final judgment of the 
world, among those who are to be selected for that office. ^ 
This accentuation of the priestly side of Vishtasp's character, 
which is found in the sacerdotal writings, seems to accord with 
the tradition that, following historic precedent, he withdrew 
from active affairs in the latest part of his life, and gave him- 
self up to pious pilgrimage or devotion. ^ 

Romantic Story of Vishtasp's Youth. — With respect to the 
youth of this ideal king we have only a romantic story told by 
Firdausi in the Shah Namah and repeated by Mirkhond on 
authority of the Tarikh Ma'jem.* According to the great 

the Yatkar-I Zariran, § 48 ; compare iv. p. 330, 341 (Mohl), Humai becomes 

also the partial list in Av. Yt. 13. 102- the wife of Isfendiar (or of Bastvar ? 

103 (see genealogical table). Thirty YZ), according to Ancient Persian 

SODS are spoken of in the Shah Namah practice of next-of-kin marriage, 
as having been slain in different battles; 2 ggg Pahlavi reference § 2 on 

it mentions two daughters by name, p. 70. 

and one of these occurs in the Avesta. s j^ ^-^ illustration, recall the classi- 

Cf. Justi, Iran. Namenbuch, p. 395. cal accounts which record his retire- 

1 Yt. 13. 139 (Huma) ; Yatkar-i Za- ment for a time to India (Sagastan, 

riran, § 57 (Humai), and compare Dar- Cabul ?), and connect with it also the 

mesteter, Le ZA. ii. 552, n. ; Dk. 9. 22. religious wisdom implied in the oracu- 

2 ; ShN. trad. Mohl, iv. p. 364, and pp. lar sayings attributed to his name. See 

330, 341, 356, 364, 372, 390, 429, 435, also Chap. XI. and p. 87, n. 1. 
558. InYZ. §57 (Geiger) and ShN. ■'ShN. trad. Mohl, iv. 224 seq., 


poetic chronicler, Vishtasp (Gushtasp) has some disagreement 
with his father King Lohrasp, and quits the city of Balkh 
which his father has founded. He leaves Iran and wanders 
westward towards Riim.^ There, at the court of an emperor, 
he accomplishes deeds of unparalleled prowess, wins the hand 
of the princess, Katayun (Kitabiin, or Nahid), becomes recon- 
ciled to his father through the good offices of his brother Zarir,^ 
returns to Iran and receives the crown from Lohrasp's hands. 
Such is the novelistic story of the Shah Namah.^ 

A similar romantic episode is preserved in Athenseus (19. 
275 a), as narrated by Chares of Mitylene, but it is told of the 
early years of Zariadres (presumably Zarir), brother to Hys- 
taspes of ' Media and the territory below.'* According to the 
account, Zariadres himself rules the territory from the Caspian 
Gates to the Tanais, in which region the scene is laid. The 
name of the princess, in this case, is Odatis. Whether this epi- 
sode, like the preceding, be founded upon fiction or upon some 
basis of fact, it is of interest because it connects the name of 
Vishtaspa, for a time at least, with the country west of Asia.^ 
When the Shah Namah makes Vishtasp (Gushtasp) return, 
and, like all the later tradition, it makes him succeed his father 
at the city of Balkh, we have a new point of contact between 
the West and the East, Media and Bactria, to add on the side 
of that theory which believes that the Religion, following Zoro- 
aster himself, gradually changed from West to East.® 

Mirkhond, History, tr. Shea, p. 263, « Consult Eapp, ZDMQ. xx. 66 ; 

266 ; cf. also Nbldeke, Cfrundriss d. Spiegel, ZDMG. xll. 294 seq. ; xlv. 

iran. Philol. ii. 133, 166. 197 ; lii. 193 ; Darmesteter, Le ZA. iil. 

1 General designation for the By- p. Ixxxi. and Justi, Iran. Namenbuch, 
zantine empire, Asia Minor, Greece, p. 382 ; Justi, Grundriss der iran. 
Borne. Philol. ii. 403. 

2 Mohl, iv. 278-281. ° On the question of change of dy- 
' ShN. trad. Mohl, iv. 288-289, and nasty in the succession of Vishtasp, 

Justi, Iran. Namenhuch, p. 159. consult what is said by Justi, Preus- 

* MtjS/os koX t^s fmoKiTU) xi^paj ; cf. sische Jahrhucher, Bd. 88, pp. 246, 

Spiegel, ZDMQ. xli. 295 ; xlv. 197 ; 252 ; Cfrdr. iran. Ph. ii. 410. See also 

lii. 193. Spiegel, ZDMG. xli. 295 ; xlv. 197. 


Far-reaching Influence of Vishtaspa's Conversion. — Viewed 
in its Mstoric light tlie conversion of Vishtaspa is the main 
event of the Religion. The struggling creed now has a royal 
patron and protector. Zoroaster, therefore, at once proceeds 
to admonish his new convert concerning the path of holiness. 
A traditional reminiscence of these admonitions is found in 
the later Avestan Yasht Fragment, Vishtasp Sasto ; ^ and the 
Zartusht Namah further exemplifies them from tradition by 
summarizing, in a general sort of way, the main outlines of the 
teachings of the Avestan Revelation.^ The Pahlavi Dinkart 
at this point adds a picturesque statement to the effect that 
' When ZaratHsht chanted the revelation in the abode of Vish- 
tasp, it was manifest to the eye that it was danced to with joy- 
fulness, both by the cattle and beasts of burden, and by the 
spirit of the iires which are in the abode.' ^ A new champion 
of the Faith, and protector of animal life as well, has been won, 
and joy reigns supreme. But the demons of Ahriman rush 
away to darkness.* 

Members of Vishtaspa's Court — Immediate Conversions — 
Living Personalities in the Gathas. — Two results followed as 
a natural sequel to the conversion of the king and his queen : 
one was, that the religion was at once generally adopted by the 
court ; the other was, that it soon began to spread throughout 
the land. The former of these two results must first be dis- 
cussed, and with it a brief description of the court personalities 
is necessary, as well as a few words upon the life and sur- 

The best picture that we have of Zarathushtra's position at 
the court of Vishtaspa, and the most real and vivid glimpses 
that we can get so as to contrast the religious times before him 
with his present life, are to be found in the Gathas themselves. 
Here we have the very words of the great Reformer or of his 

1 E.g. Yt. 24. 12 ; cf. also Dk. 8. 11. » Dk. 7. 5. 2 (West's translation). 
1 seq. « Byt. 2. 16 ; Dk. 7. 4. 87. 

2 ZtN. p. 512 seqL. 


disciples ; and the expressions heard in the Gathas have as true 
and personal a ring as the cry of the Davidic Psalms. The 
tone of the Gathas is varied. Hope, despair, exultation, dis- 
couragement, succeed each other with rapid change ; for the 
moment, confidence and assurance, but then doubt and hesi- 
tancy ; a period of zeal and activity must evidently have been 
followed by a time of repose and meditation ; now admonition, 
exhortation, and promise ; again philosophic speculation or 
veiled mystery, the spiritual sense of which could best be 
appreciated by the initiated ; a shade of darkness, yet illu- 
minated by a burst of light, by vision, by inspiration ; then 
comes the final fiery outbreak of the prophetic soul in a clarion 
note of triumph and the transport of joyous victory. These 
are the tones that run in minor chords through the Gatha 
Psalms. Well indeed would it be for the infidel and heretic if 
he would hearken unto wisdom and the Faith. The wicked 
man and the unbeliever, the Dregvant and the Daeva, are 
fiercely anathematized; the righteous Ashavan and the godly 
ruler are highly extolled. 

The little band of the faithful forms a church militant. Of 
ritual there is little or none. The communicants at the new 
altar are few, but they move in procession distinctly before our 
eyes. The Gathas mention some of them by name ; certain of 
these are Zarathushtra's kinsfolk. The Haecataspas, descend- 
ants of Spitama, who must have shared in Zarathushtra's suc- 
cess at the palace, are living personages. We recognize them 
when the Priest calls upon them in exhortation. ^ His favorite 
daughter Pourucista, whose marriage to Jamaspa forms a 
theme in one of these Psalms, may be pictured as a type of 
filial piety and womanly devotion. ^ His cousin Maidyoi-ma- 

1 Cf . also Mills, The Zend-Avesta, 'Persian Religion,' in Cheyne and 

in 8BE. xxxi. Introd. p. xxvi ; Geiger, Black's Encyclopmdia Biblica. 
in Darab D. P. Sanjana's Zarathush- ^ Compare also what is said of P5- 

tra in the Q-dthds, pp. 7-8, 163 seq. ; and riioast and Jamasp in the Pahlavi, Dk. 

likewise the allusions to Vishtaspa's 9. 45. 4 (West's translation, 8BE. 

court in Geldner's forthcoming article, xxxvii. 299-300). 


onlia is already known to us as the earliest convert and as a 
sort of beloved disciple. The noble Frashaoshtra, vizir and 
attendant upon Vishtaspa's throne, shows his faithful devotion 
to the Messenger of Ormazd by giving his daughter Hvogvi 
(Hvovi) to be a wife to him. And lastly Jamaspa, the wise 
counsellor and chancellor of the king, and brother to Frasha- 
oshtra, proves to be so sage an adviser, as time goes on, and so 
valued a supporter of the Creed, that Zoroaster's prophetic 
mantle descends upon his shoulders after the death of the 
great high priest, and King Vishtasp ordains him as the holy 
successor in the pontifical office. ^ It was he, according to tra- 
dition, who originally wrote down the 'Avesta and Zand' 
from the teachings of Zoroaster.^ With regard to these per- 
sonages of the Gathas, it is needless to add references to the 
Pahlavi literature.^ Some other details ^respecting them have 
been given above in Chapter II. A single quotation from the 
Avestan Psalms may be added here. It is from the Gatha 
UshtavaitI (Yasna 46. 14 seq.). The Prophet with his own 
lips asks a question, and in rhetorical style he gives the answer 

* Who is it, Zarathushtra, that is thy righteous friend ; or who 
is it that wishes to be renowned for his great virtue? It is the 
warrior Vishtaspa, and, with the words of Vohu Manah (Good 
Thought) I invoke those in his abode whom he has converted by his 
praising (the Religion). 

' Of you, ye children of Hagcat-aspa, descendants of Spitama, will 
I say this : that ye did distinguish the good from the evil, (and) ye 
have won for yourselves Asha (Righteousness) * by such acts as are 
the first laws of Ahura. 

'Do thou, Frashaoshtra, son of Hvogva, go thither with the 
elect whom we wish to be in bliss ; (go thither) where Armaiti (Har- 

1 See my note in Melanges Charles others, as a glance at the Indexes to 

de Harlez, pp. 138-139, Leyde, 1896. West's ' Pahlavi Texts ' in the Sacred 

''■ About B.C. 691 ; for the references, Books of the East will show. 
see Chap. VIII., pp. 97, 117, and Ap- * Lit. 'have given Asha to your- 

pendix III. selves.' 

« E.g. Dk. 9. 28. 5, and scores of 


mony, genius of the Earth) is united with Asha (Righteousness), 
•where Vohu Manah's Kingdom (Khshathra,) is established, accord- 
ing to desire, and where Ahura Mazda dwells amid abundance, and 
where, O Jamaspa, son of Hvogva, I shall proclaim the ordinances 
which are yours (ye Archangels) and nothing which is not in har- 
mony with your ordinances.'* 

Similar personal situations and allusions to the faithful are 
indicated in Ys. 51. 16 seq., 53. 1 seq., and elsewhere in these 
metrical hymns. But enough ! The principal points regarding 
Zoroaster's own immediate family have been presented in Chap- 
ter II., which deals with that subject. The genealogical table 
of the Hvogva family was presented in that chapter because it 
shows the connections which arose by the intermarriage of 
Pourucista and Jamaspa, and of Hvogvi and Zarathushtra him- 
self.^ It is easy to see how Zoroaster made his position at 
court still stronger by allying himself closely with those next 
to the throne. For almost all of the statements that have been 
made thus far the Avesta itself has been the principal source. 

Other Members of the Court Circle converted. — Among other 
conversions of those belonging to the immediate circle of the 
court of Vishtaspa, two must at once be mentioned. These are 
the king's brother Zairivairi (Phi., Mod. Pers. Zarer, Zarir) 
and the king's gallant son Spento-data (Phi. Spend-dat, Mod. 
Pers. Isfendlar). Their names do not happen to occur in the 
Gathas, but they are mentioned foremost among the faithful in 
the Avestan Yashts; and the Pahlavi Dinkart and Shikand 
Gumanik Vijar commend them to praise among the earliest 
converts. These special Pahlavi passages also show that many 
of the nobility were early attracted to the Creed. The Dinkart 
states : ' At first Zarir, Spend-dat, Frashoshtar, and Jamasp, 

1 Ys. 46. 17. I omit the latter part Av. trad. 2d ed. pp. 353-354 ; Spiegel, 

of this stanza, as unnecessary in this Avesta, uhersetzt, ii. 155. 
connection. For translations of this ^ See Chap. II., pp. 21-22, and com- 

Gatha, see also Darmesteter, Le ZA. i. pare also Dk. 9. 44. 16-19 ; 9. 45. 2-6, 

307-308 ; Geldner, BB. xiv. 23 seq. ; in 8BE. xxxvii. 297-300. 
Mills, 8BE. xxx. 142 seq. ; de Harlez, 


several of the realm who were noble, conspicuous, and well- 
acting, the good and princes of mankind, beheld visibly the will 
and desirableness of Auharmazd and the archangels, and the 
progressive religion of the creatures, fit for those completely- 
victorious.'^ The Shikand Gumanik Vijar adds its testimony, 
that ' Kai Spend-dat and Zarir and other (royal) sons, instigat- 
ing the many conflicts and shedding the blood of those of the 
realm, accepted the religion as a yoke, while they even wandered 
to Ariim and the Hindus, outside the realm, in propagating 
the religion.' 2 With regard to Spend-dat (Spento-data, Isfen- 
diar) it is interesting to observe that the late Persian author- 
ity Mirkhond conveys the idea that this heroic youth was 
largely instrumental in inducing the king, his father, to 
adopt the Faith which he himself apparently had already 

With the conversion of Zarir to the Religion, later tradition 
associates also that of the old King Lohrasp (Av. Avirvat-aspa), 
who has abdicated and is supposed still to be alive, although 
the. Avesta makes no special mention of his name in connection 
with the Creed. ^ The Shah Namah is not altogether precise, 
but it includes Lohrasp as 'the old king' among the number 
who, with Zarir and other nobles, ' girded themselves with the 
sacred cord and became converted ' to the faith which Vishtasp 
had adopted.* The later Persian Dabistan, on the authority of 
the Behdinians (' those of the good Faith ') gives the specific 
occasion of the conversion of these two, somewhat picturesquely 
as follows : ' The doctors of the pure faith record that King 
Lohrasp and Zarir, brother to Gushtasp, having fallen into so 
violent a malady that the physicians in despair desisted from 
all attendance upon them ; but having been restored to health 

1 Dk. S. 2. 12, West, 8BE. xlvii. are Yt. 24. 34, 46, as the word is there 
125. apparently an attribute. 

2 SgV. 10. 67 (West's translation, * ShN. Uhastand IcuUi hah din 
jSi?-B. xxiv. 171). amadand; ed. Vullers-Landauer, iii. 

3 Simply Yt. 5. 105, Aurvat-aspa as p. 1498 ; cf. trad. MoM, iv. 291. 
father of Vishtaspa. Very doubtful 


through the prayers of Zardusht, they adopted the pure faith.' ^ 
Another instance of faith cure or healing by Zoroaster, aided, 
however, by herbs, will be recorded below. Zoroaster himself, 
however, speaks of his own office as ' the physician of the soul.' ^ 
Conclusion. — The real success which Zoroaster won was first 
due to the influence of the king and the court. The Gathas 
give us some idea of Zoroaster's preaching before the assembled 
community. His were new words and they were listened to by 
those who came from near and far (e.g. Ys. 45. 1). With royal 
authority to back the Religion and noble power to support it, 
the advance and spread of the Faith must have been rapid, and 
accounts will next be given of other conversions and of the 
history of the religious propaganda. 

1 Dabistan, tr. Shea and Troyer, ^ Av. ahumblS, Ys. 31. 19 ; 44 

i. 255. Compare similarly Atkinson, 2, 16. 
Firdausi Shah Namah, p. 258, 11. 4-10. 




ydjvanto msprng vduraya. — Avesta, Ys. 31. 3. 

Introduction, the Ctpkess of Kishmak — Conversions more Numerous ; 
Spread op the Gospel ; Early Religious Propaganda — Spread op the 
Religion in Iran — Some Conversions in Turan — Averred Conversions 
op Hindus — Story op the Brahman ' Cangranghacah ' — The Hindu 
Sage ' Bias ' — Fabled Greek Conversions — Did Zoroaster visit Baby- 
lon ? — Conclusion 

Introduction, the Cypress of Kishmar. — In telling tlie story of 
Zoroaster and of Vishtaspa's embracing the new Faith, the Shah 
Namah narrates how Zardusht planted a cypress-tree before the 
door of the fire-temple at Kishmar, in the district of Tarshiz 
in Khorassan or Bactria, as a memento of Vistaspa's conversion, 
and had inscribed upon its trunk that ' Gushtasp had accepted 
the Good Religion.' 1 Marvellous became the growth and age 
of this wonderful tree, the famous cypress of Kishmar (^sarv-i 
Kishmar), as recounted by the Farhang-i Jahangiri, Dabistan, 
and other writings, as mentioned by Hyde and noticed more 
fully below in Appendix IV.^ The allegory is rather fine ; the 
tree typifies by its spreading branches the rapid advance of the 
Creed under the fostering care of the king and the court. 

1 Kih paMrufi GuHdsp din-i bahi, Vullers, Fragmente, pp. 71, 72, 114- 

ShN". ed. VuUers-Landauer, iii. 1499 ; 115 ; Ploigl, Gyrus und Herodot, p. 15 ; 

trad. MoM, iv. 291-293 ; Parhang-i Ja- Wilson, Farsi Beligion, 444 ; and An- 

hangirl and the Muj. cited by Hyde, quetil du Perron, as alluded to below 

Hist. Selig. (led.) 317, 327 ; the Dabis- in Appendix II. A, iii. f., n. 1, p. 164. 
tan, tr. Shea and Troyer, i. 306-309 ; " See references in preceding note. 



Other Conversions ; Spread of the Gospel ; Early Religious 
Propaganda. .^Outside of the immediate circle of the king, con- 
versions begin rapidly to follow. The way no doubt had already 
been paved among the people, and Vishtaspa's own example and 
his enthusiastic zeal could but exercise wide-spread influence. 
With all the spirit and fire of a new convert he is untiring in 
his efforts for the establishment of the Faith. The unknown 
author of the Farvadin Yasht, when he comes to Vishtaspa's 
name (Yt. 13. 99-100), breaks out into a eulogy : — 

' It was this righteous and bold warrior, 
The hero of redoubtable weapon, 
The very incarnation of the Law 
And devoted to the Lord — 
It was he, who, with advancing weapon, 
Sought out a broad path of Righteousness, 
And, with advancing weapon. 
Found the broad path of Righteousness. 

He, it was, who became the arm 
And the support of the Religion 
Of Zarathushtra, of Ahura; 
He, who dragged from her chains the Religion 
That was bound in fetters and unable to stir ; 
And made her take a place 
In the midst (of the nations). 
Exalted with power, advancing and hallowed.' 

We can but regret the loss of the eleventh Avestan Nasb, 
Xwhich dealt particularly with the promulgation of the Faith. , 
The Pahlavi treatise Din-Vijirkart tells us of its missing con- 
tents as follows : ' In this Nask is the topic of the sovereignty 
of Gushtasp, and Zaratiisht the Spitaman, having brought the 
religion from Aiiharmazd, King Gushtasp accepted it, and 
made it current in the wo rld,'^ and the Persian Rivayat 
of Kamah Bahrah gives the same testimony.^ It is true that 
the Bahman Yasht reserves till a generation later the accom- 
plishment of the task of making the religion current in the 
' whole ' world, which is finally brought about by the Kayanian 

1 Dvj. § 11, tr. West, SBE. xxxvii. 442. 2 Riy. n. tr. West, 8BE. xxxvii. 424. 


'Artashir (Kai), whom they call Vohuman son of Spend- 
dat.'i Later writers bear the same testimony to the tradition 
of Vishtaspa's religious energy. The Arab Ibn al-Athir, for 
example, states that when Vishtasp accepted the Faith 'he 
compelled his people to do the same and he killed a large 
number of them until they adopted it.'^ This may be a later 
Mohammedan view, but there is no doubt that fire and the 
sword were not absent in the Avesta, and further evidences 
will be seen in the next chapter of propaganda by religious 
crusades at home and abroad. First we must notice the 
spread of the Creed in Iran itself. 

Spread of the Religion in Iran. — It is tolerably certain that 
within Iran itself the fire of the Faith of Zoroaster rapidly 
spread, fanned, as it was, by the breath of sovereign power. 
Conversions were undoubtedly the order of the day ; adherents 
continued to multiply and devoted volunteers began to cjowd 
into the ranks which had been captained at the court. From 
the Avesta and from later literature we know the names of many 
of these. In the Yashts^ we have a prose list of nearly a 
hundred sainted persons who are connected with the Vishtaspa^^ 
circle.i They are evidently the first disciples — the so-caUed 
Paoiryo-tkaeshas — of the Zoroastrian Creed.* How far and 
how fast the religion actually spread in the earliest period we 
do not know. We know, however, that the land of Seistan was 
one of the earliest scenes of the promulgation of the Faith, as 
will be seen by the sequel and proved by the Pahlavi treatise, 
'Wonders of Sagastan,' elsewhere referred to. There were 
doubtless parts of Iran which were Zoroastrian only in name. 
The surmises on the question of Vishtaspa's exact rank and 

1 Byt. 2. 17 ; the passage should be list as Parshat-gao, Saena, Vohvasti, 
looked at in West's translation, 8BE. Isvant (Yt. 13. 96), we may compare 
V. 198-199. the Pahlavi texts, Dk. 9. 24. 17 ; 9. 33. 

2 Cf. Gottheil, Ueferences to Zoro- 5. The French translation of the 
aster, p. 40. Yashts hy Darmesteter (Le ZA. ii. 

8 Yt. 13. 95-110. 530 seq.) gives numerous identifica- 

* With such names in the Avestan tions. 


sovereignty have also been more than one. The problem of the 
exact lands and territories concerned, and at how early a 
period Persia Proper is to be included, requires discussion else- 
where. /One thing is certain, that Zoroastrianism was destined 
to become the national religion of Iran. / V- ' 

Some Conversions in Turan. — Nor is the Creed circum- 
scribed by the borders of Iran alone. From the Avesta we 
know that other lands and climes came in for a share of the 
good tidings of the Faith. The 'fravashis,' or guardian spirits 
of those who are righteous ' outside of the country,' or abroad, 
are invoked as well as those within the land.i All of which 
implies some lapse of time. And among a dozen such lands 
and countries, Turan comes in for a share of the blessing. 
Turanians are mentioned by name in the canonical list of the 
faithful whose ' fravashis,' or idealized spirits, are glorified (Yt. 
13. 111-129). In fact, among those catalogued for sainthood 
in the list is one Isvant, son of Varaza, whom the Dinkart 
counts as a Turanian when it includes his name as ' Isvant, son 
of Varaz, from the countries of THran,' among those who will 
officiate on the last day at the general resurrection. ^ In the 
Gathas themselves Zarathushtra devotes a stanza to the 
descendants of Fryana of Turan, as he was one who had been 
attracted to the Prophet and is selected to receive a destined 
reward. Zoroaster speaks of him with favoring words (Ys. 
46. 12): — 

' When Asha (Righteousness) ^ came unto those that are to 
be named as the children, and children's children, of Fryana, 
the Turanian who zealously doth further the possessions of 
Armaiti,^ and when Vohu Manah (Good Thought) took up his 

1 Ys. 26. 9 ; Vsp. 16. 2, adaKyimg,in- ZA. ii. 530, n. 179, and Justi, Iran. Na- 
ca aiaonrj,m fravaSayo yazamaide, uz- menbuch, p. 143. 
dafiyung,mca, an idea of universal ^ I.e. instr. sg. as subject; so also 
brotherhood. below and elsewhere. 

2 Dk. 9. 33. 5, West, SBE. xxxvii. * I.e. increasing Earth by agricul- 
262 ; compare also Darmesteter, Le tural activity. 


abode with them, (then) the Lord Mazda is announced to 
them to their comfort. ^ 

'This man who among men did propitiate Spitama Zara- 
thushtra by liis generosity, he is exalted to be praised; and the 
Lord Mazda gave life unto him, and Vohu Manah furthered 
for him his worldly goods, and him we regard as your goodly 
ally in Righteousness (Asha).' 

A descendant of this virtiious Turanian house,^ Yoishto yo 
Fryanam, is commemorated in a metrical passage of the 
Avesta, for his wisdom and for his victory over a mahcious 
wizard Akhtya.^ The episode is fully elaborated in the Pah- 
lavi tale which bears the name Yosht-i Fryano, and it need not 
be treated here.* 

Averred Conversions of Hindus. — In the great Persian 
Chronicle Shah Namah we have mention of the vigorous efforts 
that were made in the way of religious propaganda; Firdausi 
(or Dakiki) speaks of Mobeds who were sent on this holy mis- 
sion all over the world, assisted and aided by Isfendiar's con- 
quering sword.^ The land of ' Riim,' or Asia Minor and the 
West, as well as Hindustan are included in the successful mis- 
sionary fields. The earlier Pahlavi work, Shikand Giimamk 
Vijar (a.d. ninth century) narrates the same fact when it 
speaks of the valiant Spend-dat and Zarir, and of those other 
noble sons of Vishtasp, who accepted the religion, of the con- 

1 Or 'for their protection.' * Cf. Yt. 5. 81-83, aud the Pahlavi 

2 The house of Fryana has been YoshW Fryano, §§ 1-6, tr. hy West 
aptly identified by Eugen Wilhelm and Haug in Arda Virdf, pp. 247-266, 
with the family coming from Piran as London, 1872 ; also tr. liy A. Bar- 
ancestor, in the Shah Namah. See th^lemy, XJne legends iranienne, Paris, 
his comment in ZDMG. xliv. 151, and 1889. See West, Grundriss d. iran. 
compare also Justi, Preuss. Jahrbiicher, Philol. ii. 108, § 58, and Peshotan 
Bd. 88, p. 251, and Iran. Namenhiwh, Darab Behramjee Sanjana, Dlnkart, 
p. 106. vol. V. p. 305. 

8 This -wizard is killed in the eigh- ^ purther references will be given 

tieth year of the Religion according to in the next chapter ; meanwhile notice 

Zsp. 23. 10, West, 3BE. xlvii. 166. Shah Namah, iii. 1498 seq., ed. Vullers- 

That date would answer to b.o. 551, Landauer, and the translation of Mohl, 

see Appendix in. iv. pp. 344, 499, 513, 542, 558. 


flicts and bloodshed, and says ' they even wandered to Arum 
and the Hindus, outside the realm, in propagating the religion.' i 
The claim to Indian converts is quite persistent in the later 
writings, which is not so strange when we consider the Indo- 
Iranian kinship and the fact that the Parsis found in India an 
asylum from Mohammedan persecution. 

Story of the Brahman ' Cangranghacah,' — The most inter- 
esting episode, perhaps, of the foreign conversions is the later 
Persian story which is told of Cangranghacah, a Brahman sage 
who comes from India to Vishtasp's court in order to refute 
Zoroaster's doctrines, but the Hindu teacher himself is taught 
by the greater master and becomes a devoted convert of the 
Priest of Iran. This picturesque narrative is recounted, with 
other matters, in the Cangranghacah Namah, a modern Persian 
poetical work of the thirteenth century.^ The author of this 
treatise is stated to be Zartusht Bahram Pazhdii, of the ancient 
city of Eai, who also composed the Zartusht Namah; and like 
the latter work it is claimed to be drawn from Pahlavi sources, 
if we may agree with Anquetil du Perron, who is our chief 
source of information on the subject.^ This story of the Brah- 
man's conversion is briefly repeated in the Dabistan and it is 
alluded to incidentally in the text of the Dasatir and described 
in its commentary.* All this implies some currency of the tale. 
A brief abstract of the narrative, so far as it relates to the 
main event, is worth giving, and it is here presented, being 

1 SgT. 10. 67-68, West, SEE. xxiv. Wilson, Parsi Beligion, p. 445. But 
171. its reputation may grow like the Zar- 

2 Ms. in Ponds d' Anquetil, 10. Sup- tusht Namah. Por other references, 
pigment d' Anquetil, 13. see farther on. 

8 Anquetil du Perron, Zend-Avesta, ^ Dabistan, tr. by Shea and Troyer, 

i. Pt. 2, p. 6, n., pp. 47-53, and p. i. 276-277 ; Desatir, (Dasatir) tr. by 

xxxiii. ; also i. Pt. 1, p. dxxxvi. § 67 ; Mulla Piruz Bin Kaus, Bombay, 1818, 

and again, ii. p. 790, Index. The ii. 125-126. See Appendix VI. On 

value of this treatise is not very highly the character of the Dasatir, see also 

esteemed by Spiegel, Die Traditionelle Wilson, Parsi Religion, pp. 411-412. 
Literatur der Parsen, ii. 182, nor by 


based on the fuller account of the Cangranghacah Namah 
found in Anquetil.^ 

Sketch of the Incident. — The aged Brahman sage, Cangrang- 
hacah, is a philosopher whose learning and wisdom were far- 
famed throughout India and known in Iran. He is reported 
even to have been the teacher of Jamasp, minister to King Vish- 
tasp, whose devotion to Zoroaster is regarded as a fall from grace. 
Accordingly the Brahman writes to Vishtasp a letter remon- 
strating with the monarch for believing in the upstart Prophet. 
At the proposal of Vishtasp he finally comes himself to ' Balkh ' 
with a great following of devoted disciples, in order to debate 
with Zoroaster and to put the impostor to confusion. But he 
who came to scoff remains to pray. Zoroaster is prepared by 
premonition to answer all the seer's questions before he asks 
them; and amid a great assemblage of learned men who have 
gathered from many parts of the country to listen for days to 
the religious debate, the chosen Priest of Ormazd disarms his 
antagonist before the latter has time to lift his weapons in dis- 
cussion and conflict. By reading a Nask or book of the 
Avesta, in which every difficult question prepared by the 
Hindu controversialist is already answered, he astonishes and 
utterly confounds the Brahman. So completely is the Hindu 
philosopher vanquished and convinced, that with remarkable 
candor he forthwith acknowledges his defeat, is converted, 
adopts the Faith, receives a copy of the Avesta from Zoroas- 
ter's own hands, becomes a zealous adherent, and joins in 
spreading the Prophet's teachings in Hindustan and the adja- 
cent countries, so that eighty thousand souls in this way 
receive the enlightenment of the true Faith. A festival is 
instituted to commemorate this important event. Such in 
brief is the story, which remotely reminds us of the ecclesias- 
tical convocations and the discussions and disputations of 

This legend, as stated, seems rather to be of later origin, and 
I Anquetil du Perron, Zend-Avesta, i. Pt. 2, pp. 47-53. 


it may have arisen after Zoroastrian believers found refuge in 
India in Mohammedan days; and where, as time went on, Brah- 
mans and Dasturs perhaps came into debate and conflict. Nev- 
ertheless it is as old as the Zartusht Namah, which has been 
proved to contain old material, and it is by the same author, as 
already explained ; and religious intercourse and connection 
between India and Iran at all periods in history is undoubted. ^ 
No great religion is confined to the bounds of its own country. 
And as for religious controversies and debates, nothing is more 
common. The Avesta alludes to a victorious debate with 
Naidyah Gaotema, whom some have tried, among several other 
suggestions, to identify with this same Brahman Cangrang- 
hacah.'^ The Pahlavi texts speak of ZaratHsht's discussions 
with learned men whose questions he is able to answer even 
before they ask them. The statements on this subject have 
been given above.^ It is possible that in the Avesta we may 
discover the source of the story, which seems to be somewhat 
legendary, in a mistaken view that the Avestan adjective can- 
ranhae (Vsp. 1. 1, etc.) contains an allusion to a proper name. 
Anquetil du Perron himself understood that epithet in the Vis- 
perad as an allusion to the Hindu sage.* On the other hand 
some have seen in this tradition of an Indian wise man, who 
comes to Iran, a late story concocted as an allusion to the 
famous Vedantist philosopher, S'ankara-Acarya.^ This view 

1 The references of the Pahlavi The other identifications that have 
Shikand GQmanik Vijar and of the been suggested for Gaotema are dis- 
Shah Namah to Zoroastrianism in In- cussed in Appendix II., p. 177-178. 
dia have been given above. Further- » gee p. 61, and cf. Dk. 7. 4. 73; 5. 
more, on relations and intercourse 2. 10 ; Zsp. 23. 5 ("West, 8BE. xlvii. 
between Persia and India in religious 67, 124, 164). 

matters, see Shea and Troyer's note * Zend^Aoesta, i. Pt. 2, p. 92, and 

in Bab. i. 276 n. ; also the story of p. 51. 

Bias, next to be given ; and p. 72, n. 3. ^ See Br^al, Xe Brahme Tcheng- 

2 Yt. 13. 16, see Windisohmann, renghdtchah, in Journal Asiatique, 
Mithra, p. 29, who suggests the pos- 1862, p. 497. Compare also Shea and 
sibility; but this is rejected by Justi, Troyer,I>a6is«a»,i. 276, n. (Paris, 1843); 
Sdb. d. Zendsprache, s.v. gaotama. and Darmesteter, Le ZA. 1. p. 444, n. 


is especially based on an identification of the great philoso- 
pher's name with the form of the Brahman's name which is 
found in the Dasatir (vol. ii. 125) as Sankarakas (for which 
the Commentary understands Cangranghacah).^ Such a view 
is to be maintained only by premising that we are to regard 
the story as a later invention, purposely made up to exalt the 
triumph of an Iranian over a Hindu philosopher. 

The Hindu Sage 'Bias.' — A sequel to the story of the con- 
version of Cangranghacah is found in the tale of ' Bias ' told in 
the Dasatir and repeated from this source by the author of the 
Dabistan.^ The account describes how, when the news of 
Cangranghacah's confession became noised abroad, another 
sage, Bias (i.e. Vyasa) by name, came from India to Iran in 
order to refute Zoroaster and to convert him. Like his prede- 
cessor, however. Bias is soon impressed by Zardusht's super- 
human knowledge and divine insight, which penetrates even 
into the inmost thoughts of his soul, so that he also accepts the 
religion, or (to quote the actual words of the Dasatir com- 
mentary) 'he returned thanks to Yezdan and united himself 
to the Behdin, after which he returned back to Hind.' ^ This 
story is merely a counterpart of the preceding — a combina- 
tion of legend and myth that seeks to bring Vyasa, the fabulous 
author of the Vedas, into connection with Zarathushtra. 

Fabled Greek Conversions. — The statements of the Pahlavi 
Shikand Grimanik Vijar and of the Persian Shah Namah 
have already been given as claiming traditionally that the West 
(Phi. Ariim, Pers. Riim)* came under Zoroaster's influence. 
The tradition is late, but in one respect it might not be so far 
from the truth if we should choose to look at Zoroastrianism 
simply in the light of Mithra-worship which, as is well linown. 

1 The Desatir (Dasatir), Bombay, ' Dasatir, ii. 144 ; Dabistan, i. 280- 

1818, vol. ii. 125. See Appendix VI., 283. See Appendix VI. 
where the passage is reprinted. * The comprehensive term to denote 

2 Dasatir ii. 126-143 (§§ 65-162) Asia Minor, Greece, and the Roman 

and Dabistan, i. 280-283. Empire. 


pushed its way even far into Europe. It is not unnatural, more- 
over, for religious devotees to lay claims to extraordinary foreign 
missionary conquests. This third great debate or theological 
dispute into which Zoroaster is presumed to have entered and 
to have come off victorious, is with a Greek philosopher and 
master, as recorded in the Dasatir and noticed by the Dabis- 
tan.i The account is doubtless apocryphal, but it deserves 
consideration with the other alleged conversions, and there is 
perhaps a far-off echo of it in Hamzah of Isfahan, in a passage 
which describes how the Greeks evaded attempts to convert 
them, and the passage is given below in Appendix IV. ^ 

Briefly the Dasatir story of this conversion incident is as 
follows : In a prophetic passage the text of the Dasatir tells 
how a wise man, named Tianur (Pers. Tiitianiish) or NiyatHs, 
as the Dabistan calls him,^ 'will come from Niirakh (Pers. 
Yunan, i.e. Greece) in order to consult thee (O Zardusht) 
concerning the real nature of things. I will tell thee what he 
asketh and do thou answer his questions before he putteth 
them.'* The commentary upon this passage and also the 
Dabistan expressly state that the sages of Greece despatched 
this learned man after Isfendiar had promulgated the Faith in 
many lands. We may therefore infer that the event, if it 
occurred at all, took place some years after King Vishtasp had 
accepted the Religion. The god Mazda, on this occasion like- 
wise, instructs his prophet what he shall say and how he shall 
respond to the foreigner who is described as coming to 
' Balkh. ' ^ Ormazd assures Zardusht of success, and the com- 
mentary adds that 'when the Yunani (i.e. Greek) sage heard 
all these words (of Zardusht), he entered into the Faith and 

1 Dasatir, ii. 120-125 (§§ 42-62) ; and Shea and Troyer's note to the 
Dabistan, i. 277-278. passage. On the language of the Da- 

2 For the original, see Hamzah al- satir, see what is said in Wilson, Parsi 
Isfahan!, Annates, ed. Gottwaldt, p. 26; Religion, pp. 411-412. 

ci. Gottheil, Meferences to Zoroaster, ^ Dasatir, ii. 120, §§ 42-43. 

p. 33 and also p. 199 below. ^ See commentary upon Dasatir, ii. 

8 Dasatir, ii. 120 ; Dabistan, i. 277, 120, § 43 ; reprinted in Appendix VI. 


studied knowledge under the beloved of God, Zardusht the 
Prophet. (As a reward, moreover), the king of kings, Gush- 
tasp, bestowed on him the office of Chief of the Hirbeds of 
Yunan, and of the Mobeds of that country. The accomplished 
man (accordingly), having returned back to Yunan, brought 
over the inhabitants to the religion of that blessed Prophet.' ^ 

This story, whatever may be its worth or its worthlessness, 
is not uninteresting because it shows the existence of a tradi- 
tion on the Oriental side regarding early connections between 
Iran and Greece in which religious matters came into play. 
There may, of course, lurk in such tradition some reminiscence 
of intercourse between the nations prior to the Graeco-Persian 
wars. The note of Hamzah al-Isfahani on some attempt to 
spread Zardusht's Gospel among the Hellenes has been men- 
tioned above, with a Pahlavi reference also and a tradition in 
Firdausi.^ We must not forget that the Dinkart asserts that a 
Greek translation was made of the Avesta.^ We may further- 
more recall several allusions of the Greeks themselves to the 
effect that Plato, Hermodorus, Theopompus, and others came 
under the influence of Magian doctrines.* The name of this 
Grecian converted sage (Tianiir, Tutianiish, or Niyatus) is very 
obscure and the reading is uncertain. But an identification 
with Pythagoras has been suggested on the basis of the point 
just presented.^ Whether founded on fiction, as is likely, or 
based upon faipt, as is unlikely, the account merits recording 
and is fully given in Appendix VI. below, while the classical 
passages on Pythagoras, who is said to have studied in Babylon 
under the Magi, and on Plato might be worth looking over 
again in Appendix V., and in Chapter I., p. 7, n. 5. 

Did Zoroaster ever visit Babylon ? — In this same connection, 
when speaking of Babylon, it may be appropriate perhaps to 

1 Dasatir, ii. 125, § 62, commentary * For references, see Chap. I., pp. 
and text. 7-8. 

2 See pp. 78, 84, 88. « See Troyer's note on Dabistan, i. 

3 Dk. 3 (West, 8BE. xxxvii. p. 277. I should think ' Plato ' might be 
xxxi.). as plausible a suggestion. 


mention a statement made by the Pahlavi Dinkart which ascribes 
to the religion of Zaratusht the overthrow of error and evil in 
' Bapel,' and it accounts this achievement as one of the marvels 
of the Faith.i The passage speaks of the existence of ' several 
matters of evil deceit which Dahak had done in Bapel through 
witchcraft ; and mankind had come to idol-worship through that 
seduction, and its increase was the destruction of the world ; 
but through the triumphant words of the religion which Zara- 
tiisht proclaimed opposing it, that witchcraft is all dissipated 
and disabled. '2 

There is of course a distant possibility that after the Faith 
became fairly established Zoroaster himself actually did go on 
missionary journeys, teaching and preaching and exercising the 
influence of his own strong personality. We need only think 
of the three brief years of our Lord's ministry. At all events 
it is not wholly impossible to believe that several places were 
visited, perhaps including Persepolis also,^ even if we are not 
prepared to accept so extravagant a view as that Babylon was 
among the number. It is true that some of the classical writers 
make Pythagoras a follower of Zoroaster or at least of the Magi, 
who were established at Babylon and into whose mysteries he 
was initiated.* The theory of personal travel need not be 
pressed too far ; where the effect of the Religion came, there also 
the Master himseK had gone in influence, if not in person. In 

1 Dk. 7. 4. 72, West's translation in in the Avesta as ' Bawri ' ; of. Yt. 5. 
SBE. xlvii. 66. 29-31 ; cf. 15. 19-21. In Mkh. 27. 64- 

2 Ttie text does not indicate at what 67, the old king, Lohrasp, is regarded 
time in Zoroaster's career this event is as having destroyed Jerusalem and dis- 
supposed to have been brought about, persed the Jews, a statement which is 
or whether it did not come to pass found elsewhere ; see West, SBE. 
later through the developments and xxiv. 64. Somewhat similar is Dk. 6. 
spread of the Religion. The actual 1.5, cf. SBE. xlvii. 120. Brunnhofer, 
fall of Babylon occurred a generation Vom Pontus Ms zum Indus, p. 147, 
after the Prophet. One might possibly might be noticed. 

conjecture from the passage that ' the » gee references to Istakhr already 

Religion ' perhaps joined hands with given, and also below in Appendix IV. 
the conqueror Cyrus in destroying this * See references in Chap. I., pp. 

city, which is spoken of with hatred 7-8, and in Appendix V. 


this we have only another phase of the footprints of Buddha. 
Regarding Babylon, moreover, everything which associates 
Zoroaster's name with this city can but be of interest to the 
student of the Exilic Period of the Bible. 

Conclusion. — The story of the spread of the Faith, so far as 
we can gather it from tradition, implies that missionary efforts 
carried the Avesta to foreign lands as well as throughout the 
territory of Iran. Tales are told of Hindu conversions, and 
even Greeks are fabled to have accepted the Creed. Zoroaster 
himself may possibly have engaged personally in the general 
movement of the propaganda, but there is no proof that he 
visited Babylon. His time no doubt was constantly taken up 
in working for the Faith ; ' some of the results which were 
achieved and some of the events which happened in the follow- 
ing years of the Religion are recorded in the next two 




Homo in sacerdotio diligentissimus. 

— CicEKO, Oratio pro Bab. Ferd. 10. 27. 


Zoroaster's Healing a Blind Man — Question of Zoroaster's Scien- 
tific Knowledge — Other Items of Interest, Incidents, and Events 
— The Sacred Eires — CoNCLnsiou 

Introduction. — /Zoroaster's life was a long one and his min- 
istry covered a number of years; yet tradition does not give us 
all the details which we might wish so as to be able more defi- 
nitely to mark off into periods or epochs the fifteen years or 
more that intervened between Vishtaspa's conversion and the 
beginning of the Holy Wars that were waged against Arejat- 
aspaJ In other words, we are not altogether clear in dividing 
up and distributing the events that seem to have happened, 
roughly speaking, between Zoroaster's forty-fifth year and the 
sixtieth year of his life. We certainly know they must have 
been active years, the years of a man of vigorous mind who 
has just passed his prime, and no doubt some of the events 
which have been described in the preceding chapter may 
belong to this time, or even possibly later. The foregoing 
chapter, in fact, perhaps leaves an impression of too great pre- 
cision in the distribution of its incidents. We may therefore 
take it with some latitude in connection with the present. If 
an attempted distinction is to be drawn, as the latter chapter dealt 
mainly with promulgation and conversion, this one may deal 



rather with the ministration and organization, with missionary 
labors and tte exercise of priestly functions. It must be kept 
in mind, however, that trying to locate in it the events which 
may have occurred at this time is a task that is difficult to per- 
form with much satisfaction, and the work may be regarded 
rather as tentative, and as an endeavor to use material which 
remains at hand. 

Record of a Noteworthy Conversion. — One event, however, 
is definitely located for us by tradition as belonging to a spe- 
cific year in this period. The circumstance must have been 
regarded as one of real importance, owing to its being so 
emphatically chronicled; we shall therefore notice it at once. 
It is the conversion of a heretic, a Kavig or ungodly priest, 
who is won over to the true Faith. This is recorded in the 
Selections of Zat-sparam, which say: 'In the twentieth year 
(of the Religion) the Kavig who is son of Kundah is attracted 
(to the Faith).' ^ Although the name is not definitely known, 
the incident is none the less sure; and if we accept the tradi- 
tional date of ' the twentieth year ' of the Religion, we may set 
down this event for B.C. 611,2 ^t which time Zoroaster would 
have been in the fiftieth year of his age. All this makes the 
incident not without interest. 

Tradition of Zoroaster's healing a Blind Man. — In connec- 
tion with Zoroaster's ministry and possibly as a reminiscence 
of a missionary journey, or work in that field, unless we are to 
refer it to an earlier period of his career, we may make men- 
tion here of a legendary story of his healing a blind man. 
The story is told by Shahrastani of Khorassan (a.d. 1086- 
1153) who locates the scene rather in Persia Proper.^ The 

1 Zsp. 23. 8, West, SBE. xlvii. 165. xlvii. Introd. § 55, and Appendix III. 
The reading of the proper name from below. 

the Pahlavi is not certain. West's * My attention was first drawn to 

note on the passage offers ' Kunlh ' as this story by a letter from Prof. G. F. 

a possibility. Moore, AndoYer, Mass., dated June 

2 According to the Biindahishnchro- 23, 1892. 
nology -worked out by West, SBE. 


account runs as follows: 'As he (i.e. Zardusht) was passing a 
blind man in Dinawar,i he told them to take a plant, which he 
described, and to drop the juice of it into the man's eyes, and he 
would be able to see; they did this and the blind man was restored 
to sight. '2 Even if this incident should belong to an earlier 
period of Zoroaster's life, or to the time of his wandering, it 
nevertheless serves to show a tradition that miraculous healing 
power was believed to be exercised both by Zoroaster and by 
virtue of the Faith itself. The latter point might find 
sufficient exemplification in the Avestan Vendidad. 

Question of Zoroaster's Scientific Knowledge. — The tradi- 
tion which has just been recounted of the healing of the blind 
man brings up another point which requires note. This is the 
question of Zoroaster's scientific knowledge, which is a side of 
his character that is distinctly recognized by tradition, and 
which must have come into play in his ministry. There is evi- 
dence that he showed a practical bent of mind in his work as 
well as the theoretical and speculative turn in his teaching. . 
All accounts of the Eeligion indicate that the necessity of minis- 
tering to the wants of the body, as well as to the needs of the 
soul, was fuUy comprehended. Nor is medical knowledge 
to-day regarded as unessential or to be dispensed with in some 
branches of foreign missionary work. The records of antiquity 
imply that the Zoroastrian books, by their encyclopsediac 
character, stood for many sides of life. Some of the original 
Nasks of the Avesta are reported to have been wholly sci- 
entific in their contents, and the Greeks even speak of books 
purported to be by Zoroaster on physics, the stars, and precious 
stones.^ It is true these need not have come from Zoroaster at 

1 This village is located by Yakut, scientiflque en Perse; Paris, 1894-97, 

twenty farsangs from Hamadan ; it lies especially tome iv. p. 290. 
between this and KIrmanshah. See ^ Gottheil, Beferences to Zoroaster, 

Barbier de Meynard, Dictionnaire de p. 50. 

la Perse, p. 251, p. 367 (Shiz), 515 » gee p. 8 above, and Appendix V. 

(Mah-Dinar) ; and for a description below, under Suidas and Pliny, 
of the place see de Morgan Mission 


all; but this represents a phase of life that Zoroaster or his \ 
apostles stood for. Tradition recognizes the presence of this 
practical element in the Religion which made it appeal to 
many who might not otherwise have been attracted, and which 
must have contributed in no small degree to its spread. The 
priests were the real conservators of knowledge and learning./ 

As an illustration of their practical knowledge, so serviceable 
to mankind, we may notice a passage in the Dinkart, which 
claims that the debt owed to Zoroaster in this respect is 
extensive. The text reads : ' One marvel is the disclosure by 
Zaratiisht, in complete beneficence, medical knowledge, ac- 
quaintance with character, and other professional retentiveness, 
secretly and completely, of what is necessary for legal knowl- 
edge and spiritual perception ; also, the indication by revelation, 
of the rites for driving out pestilence, overpowering the demon 
and witch, and disabling sorcery and witchcraft. The curing 
of disease, the counteraction of wolves and noxious creatures, 
the liberation of rain.'^ This and a number of ordinary prac- 
tices, which have a bearing upon every-day life, are included in 
this list of what the Pahlavi text calls 'worldly wisdom' 
(^gehdno-xiratdih), as contrasted with 'angelic wisdom' or 'divine 
knowledge' (jyazddno-xiratoih').^ The brief resume sums up 
what was expected to be found in the repertory of the wandering 
Athravan, or descendant of the Prophet, at least in Sassanian 
times, and quite as likely it represents some of the sides of 
Zoroaster's own activity during the long period of his 

Other Items of Interest, Incidents, and Events. — Tradition 
has preserved a few more items of interest, incidents, or occur- 
rences and events which may belong to the period of these 
years. A suggestion has been made that Zoroaster may have 
visited his own home in his native land of Adarbaijan. Anque- 
til even thought that Urumiah is mentioned in the Avesta in 

1 Dk. 7. 6. 8-9, translated by West. ^ gee West's note in SBE. xlvii. 76. 
8BE. xlvii. 75-76. 


an injunction given by Ahura Mazda bidding Zarathusbtra, as 
he conceived it, to proceed to a certain place. But this is a 
naistaken interpretation of the passage.^ Anquetil also under- 
stood that Zoroaster and Vishtasp v^ere together in Istakhr 
(Persepolis).^ This vievr is apparently based upon the fact 
that Zoroaster induces Vishtasp to transfer one of the sacred 
fires from Khorasmia to Darabjard, in Persia, as stated by Masudi,^ 
and based upon Tabari (and Bundari after him) who describes 
how the Avesta was written down in golden letters upon the 
Edes of twelve thousand oxen and 'Vishtasp placed this at 
Istakhr in a place called Darbisht (or Zarbisht ?).' * This may 
be noticed also in connection with the tradition of Jamasp's 
writing down the Avesta from Zoroaster's teachings (p. 76), 
and IS also brought up in connection with the tradition that 
the archetype copy of the Avesta was deposited in the 
' treasury of Shapigan' (or however we are to read the name 
and its variants) as discussed below in Appendix IV. 
'^'During this period we can likewise imagine Zoroaster as \ 
otherwise much engaged in organizing the new religion, in 
founding fire-temples as described below, and in exercising in 
^^rious ways his function as Chief Priest ^mot the least of these 
perhaps was in establishing the rite of ordeal as already noticed, 
or in celebrating the event of Vishtasp's conversion by planting 
the cypress of Kishmar, before described. There were also 
times when prophetic visions were granted and hallowed enun- 
ciations were made. The Pahlavi Bahman Yasht (and after it 
the Zartusht Namah) records a favored vision which was allowed 
to Zoroaster, in which he foresees, during a seven days' trance, 
the whole future of the Religion.^ Even the Apocryphal New 
Testament in one passage claims that Zoroaster prophesied the 

1 Anquetil du Perron, i. Pt. 2, p. ' Masudi, trad. Barbier de Meynard, 
52, n. 1. The misinterpretation of iv. 75. 

tlie words Airyama Ishya is repeated * Gottheil, Beferences to Zoroaster, 

by Kleuker, ZA. Theil 3, p. 35. p. 37 ; Hyde, Hist. Belig. p. 315 (1 ed.). 

2 Anquetil du Perron, op. cit. p. 53 ^ Bahman Yt. 2. 6-9, seq., tr. by 
= Kleuker, ZA. Theil 3, p. 35. West, SBE. v. pp. 191-235. 


coming of Christ ; ^ and a Syriac writer, Solomon of Hilat 
(a.d. 1250) tells a tradition of a special fountain of water, 
called Glosha of Horin, where the royal bath was erected and 
by the side of this fountain Zoroaster predicted to his disciples 
the coming of the Messiah. ^ , 

^ The Sacred Fires, -^here can be little doubt that much of^. 
Zoroaster's time was spent in the care of the sacred fire or in 
the furthering of the special cult throughout the land. Tradition 
counts that one of the most important features of Vishtaspa's 
conversion was his active agency in founding new places in 
which the holy flame might be worshipped or in reestablish- . 
ing old Atash-gahs.,^' In a special (prose) chapter, the Avesta 
describes the various sacred fires recognized by the Faith, and 
the Bundahishn gives additional details on the subject ; ^ Fir- 
dausi mentions several so-called Fire-Temples,* and Masiidi, 
among other Mohammedan writers, devotes a number of pages 
to the subject of the Magian pyraea, several of which he says 
existed before Zoroaster came.® Numerous Arabic writers 
refer to the question, and as their references are accessible, 
they need only be summarized here.^ 

Masiidi and Shahrastani tell of some ten different Pyraea 
or places of fire-worship which existed in Iran before Zoro- 
aster's time, and they give the name or location of each. Zoro- 
aster himself causes a new temple to be built in Nishapiir, and 
another in Nisaea.'' Furthermore, at his request King Vishtasp 

1 Apocr. NT. I. Infancy, ch. iii. 1. ^ MasudI, Les Prairies d'Or. Texte 

2 See Gottheil, Beferences to Zoro- et Trad, par C. Barbier de Meynard, 
aster, p. 29 ; Kuhn, Eine Zoroastrische iv. 72, 75 seq. ; and see Shahrastani, 
Prophezeiung, p. 219 in Festgruss an Uehersetzt, Haarbrucker, i. 275 seq. 
Roth, Stuttgart, 1893 ; and Wallis * On the fires, see especially the 
Budge, Book of the Bee, p. 81 seq. in material in Gottheil, Beferences to Zo- 
Anec. Oxon., Oxford, 1886. Of course roaster, pp. 45-47 ; Hyde Belig. Pers. 
compare Yt. 19. 89-95 ; Dk. 7. 8. 55. p. 353-362. 

8 Avesta, Ys. 17. 11 ; cf. also Vd. 8. ' Mastidi, Prairies, iv. 75 ; Shahras- 

73-96 ; Pahl. Bd. 17. 1-9. See especially tani, i. 276 ; of. Gottheil, Beferences to 

Darmesteter, Le ZA. i. 149-157. Zoroaster, pp. 45, 47. 

* E.g. ShN. Mohl, iv. 291, 364, etc. 


seeks for the fire of Jemshed, which is found in Khorasmia, and 
he has it transferred to Darabjard in Persia. This latter fire 
is said to be especially venerated by the Magi. Other Pyraea 
are mentioned in Seistan, Rum (Constantinople), Bagdad, Greece 
(without the fire), India, and in China. Not without interest 
is the mention of the fire-temple in Kumis (Comisene) which 
bore the name of - Jarir,' apparently after Vishtasp's son Zarir.^ 

Among all the fires there seem to be three which stand, in 
later times of the Sassanians, as the threefold representative of 
the sacred element, corresponding to the social division of the 
community into three classes, priests, warriors, and laboring 
men. 2 The names of the three great fires are given as fol- 
lows : — 

1. AtGr Farnbag, the fire of the priests. This fire, 
whose name appears as Farnbag, Froba, Khurrad, Khordad, 
being a corruption of * Hvareno-bagha or * Hvareno-data, i.e. 
' the fire of the Glory Divine, or the fire Glory-Given,' is one 
of the most ancient and most sacred of the holy fires in Iran.^ 
Existing as early as Yima's reign, and having been established 
in the Khorasmian land or the eastern shore of the Caspian 
Sea, it was removed by Kavi Vishtaspa to Cabul, if we are to 
accept the commonly received statements on the subject.* 

1 So Shasrastanl, i. 275, but seem- reading ' KavTil (Kabul) ' -whioli West, 

ingly a different reading or form of however, gives (SSE. v. 63). Dar- 

the name (i.e. Djeriohi) is found in mesteter follovrs Masudi, Shahrastanl, 

MasMI, iv. 74. See also Gottheil, Eef- and Yakut ; similarly, Ibn al-Faklh al- 

erences to Zoroaster, pp. 45, 46. Hamadhani (a.d. 910) ; Albiruni (p. 

2Bd. 17. 5-8, and Ys. 17. 11. Cf. 215, tr. Saohau)— all cited by Gottheil, 

Darmesteter, Le ZA. i. 149 seq., and References to Zoroaster, pp. 43-47. 

Masudi loc. cit. The subject is also discussed below in 

3 Cf. Arda Viraf, tr. Haug and connection with the scene of Zoro- 

West, p. 146, note ; and Bd. 17. 5-6. aster's ministry, Appendix IV., p. 217. 

* So Bd. 17. 5-6 if we read the It is evident that Shahrastam's Aza- 

Pahlavi name as ' Kabul ' with West ruSa is for Adaran shah, ' king of 

(SBE. V. 63) ; otherwise we may un- fires,' Darmesteter, Le ZA. i. 157, 

derstand it was removed, not eastward, Gottheil, References to Zoroaster, 

but to the west, if we follow Darmes- p. 47. 
teter, Le ZA. i. 154, in doubting the 


2. Atur Gushnasp (Gushasp), the fire of the warriors. 
The name Gushnasp is probably a corruption from * Varshan- 
aspa, 'male-horse,' cf. Skt. vrsan-as'vd, an epithet of Agni, as 
noted by Darmesteter. This was a very ancient fire and it 
early played a part when Kai Khiisrav exterminated idol-wor- 
ship. It was situated in the neighborhood of Lake Urumiah, 
or on Mount Asnavand upon the shores of that lake.^ Accord- 
ing to the Zaratusht Namah, this was one of the fires which 
came with the Archangels to aid in Vishtaspa's conversion as 
described in Chap. V., p. 65, n. 1. 

3. Atiir Biirzhin Mitr 6, the representative of the labor- 
ing class. The name, also in Persian, Burzin Mihr, corre- 
sponds to * Berezant Mithra.^ This third fire, or the special 
fire of the laborer, played an important part in Vishtaspa's con- 
version. This is located on Mount Raevant in Khorassan in the 
vicinity of Lake Sovar (mentioned in the Biindahishn), in the 
region of Tiis, as noticed also below in Appendix IV., p. 216.^ 
A similar situation is given to it by Firdausi.* Perhaps there 
is an echo of the name of this fire lingering in the name of the 
small town Mihr to the west of Nishapiir, although for a fuller 
statement of Houtum-Schindler's view, reference is made to 
p. 216. Several of the Mohammedan writers, as noticed above, 
state that the special fire of Zoroaster was in the neighborhood 
of Nishapur. We recall that Khorassan was the land of the 
planting of the cypress of Kishmar, and the scene of the clos- 
ing battles which ended the Holy War — all of which is of inter- 
est in connection with the field of Zoroaster's ministry. 

Conclusion. — The aim of this chapter has been to present 
such material as we can gather for the events of Zoroaster's 
life during the years next preceding the outbreak of the Holy 

' Bd. 17. 7 ; Zsp. 6. 22 ; West, iSBE. v. 38, 41, 173. See likewise Anquetil 

V. 63, 173. See also p. 48 above. du Perron, ZA. i. Pt. 2, p. 46, n. 2 

2 Cf. Av. Mierdm . . . hdrdzantdm, (on Khorassan). 

yt. 10. 7. * Cf. ShN. iii. 1499, Vullers-Lan- 

8 Bd. 12. 18. 32-35 ; Zsp. 6. 22 ; of. dauer = trad. Mohl, iv. 291. 
also Bd. 12. 24 ; 22. 3 ; "West, SEE. 


Wars. / In this way an impression has been gained of certain^ 
other sides of Zoroaster's character and activity, especially the 
-practical side which his nature probably also had.y^ The mate- 
rial from which to judge of these points, however, is found to 
be rather meagre. Finally, special attention has also been 
devoted to the subject of the spread of the fire-cult by Zoro- 
aster and the work which was accomplished in founding new 
Atash-gahs or in reestablishing the old Pyraea. But all these 
events did not come to pass without a struggle; nor were the 
actual results achieved without a hard fight. If the Faith 
which Vishtaspa has adopted is to become the state creed of 
the realm, this is not destined to come to pass without a 
struggle, especially with powers outside. Warfare is insep- 
arable from crusading; and we see gathered in the horizon the 
clouds of the storm about to burst over Iran. 




'Eight the good fight of faith.' 

— Timothy I. 6. 12. 

Inteodttction — Religious Waefaee in the Avesta — Akejat-aspa, or 
Aejasp and the Holt Wars — Ohtbeeak of Hostilities ; Causes and 
Dates — Aejasp's Ultimatum — His Fiest Invasion ; the Holt Wak 
BEGINS — Aejasp's Armt and its Leaders — Vishtasp's Army and its 
Commanders — Battles of the Eiest War — Isfendiae as Crusader, 
and the Following Events — Aejasp's Second Invasion ; the Last 
Holt War — Summary 

Introduction. — Up to this point it might appear as if the\ 
progress of the Religion had been one only of success and 
smooth advance. Such, however, cannot have been the case in 
reality. We have to do with a church militant, and there is 
evidence, in its history, of more than one hard-fought battle 
before victory is achieved. Not all conversions were easily 
made. The sword rather than the olive-branch would be the 
more suitable emblem to deck the earlier pages of the history/ 
of the Faith. 

Owing to circumstances the development of the idea of uni- 
versal peace and of general good-will towards neighbors was 
not allowed to play so important a part as it might have 
played theoretically in the first stages of the new Religion. 
When crusading for the Faith began, bitter struggles and 
antipathies soon came into existence. The war-cry of creed 
versus unbelief begins to fill the air. Old political and 



national feuds take on a new color — tlie tinge of religious 
antagonism. This latter statement is especially trup of the 
ancient enmity between Iran and Xuran. This breaks out 
afresh in the form of a war of creeds between the Hyaonian 
leader Arejat-aspa, as he is called in the Avesta, or Arjasp of 
Turan, as he is later generally styled, and the pious hero of 
Zoroastrianism, Kavi Vishtaspa (Vishtasp, Gushtasp). Vic- 
tory ultimately attends upon the Creed of the Fire and the 
Sacred Girdle, but the stages of progress have to be fought 
step by step. Bloodshed and distress precede success and/ 
triumph. -^ 

Religious Wars in the Avesta. — Before turning to the great 
Holy Wars against Arejat-aspa, we must first notice that the 
Avesta also records several other violent conflicts which are 
looked upon in the light of hallowed warfare against unbelief^ 
-The Avesta mentions some eight powerful foes over whom 
Vishtaspa, or his gallant brother Zairivairi (Zarir) invoke 
divine aid in battle, and victory descends upon their banners in^ 

'answer to their prayers. / We know at least the names of these 
vanquished warriors, for they are given in the Yashts. We 
read of Tathryavant and Peshana,^ Ashta-aurvant, son of Vispa- 
thaurvo-ashti,^ Darshinika and Spinjaurusha^ and of Pesho- 
cingha and Humayaka.* All are spoken of as infidels, heathen, 
heretics, or unbelievers. The details of the battles against 
them are unfortunately lost. In point of time some of these 
occurred in the period of conversions already described. 
From the claims of the sacred text we know that victory 
waited upon the faithful. ^■~-' 

Arejat-aspa (Arjasp) and the Holy Wars.— f The inveterate 

^'^foe and mortal enemy of Vishtaspa, however, is Arejat-aspa 
(Arjasp), or the infidel Turk, as later history would have 
styled him. He stands as the great opponent of the national 
Faith, and we are fortunate in having considerable traditional 

1 Yt. 5. 109 ; Yt. 19. 87 ; cf. Yt. 9. 31. « Yt. 9. 30-31. 

2 So Darmesteter, Le ZA. ii. 439. * Yt. 5. 113. 


information preserved regarding these wars with him. They 
are of paramount importance in the history of Zoroaster and 
his Creed, and they require fuller discussion. Details of the 
campaigns may be gathered from the Avesta, the Pahlavi writ- 
ings, the Shah Namah, and from some allusions in Arab chroni^ 
clers._7 The account given in the Shah Namah dates from the 
tenth century of our era, and it is partly by the hand of Fir- 
dausi's predecessor, Dakiki, as FirdausI himself expressly states 
when he describes the thousand lines which he had received 
from Dakiki in a dream — the thousand lines relating to Zo- 
roaster and Gushtasp and the founding of the Faith.^ The 
principal references are here collected and presented for 

The warfare against Arejat-aspa is kilown in the Pahlavi 
writings as 'the war of the religion.'^ In the Avestan and 
Pahlavi texts Arejat-aspa (Arjasp) is the leader of the hostile 
folk known as Hyaonians (A v. H'yaona, Phi. Khyon). This 
nation has rightly or wrongly been identified with the Chionitae 
of the classics. This subject is more fully discussed below in 
Appendix IV. In any event Arejat-aspa stands for the head 

1 See p. 5, n. 2 ; also see Mohl, trad. Sah-Name, In Sb. d. k. bayer. Akad. 
iv. 286-357, and consult Noldeke in der Wiss. 1890, Bd. ii. pp. 43-84. — 
Qrundriss der iran. Philol. ii. 148-150. Pirdausi, Shah Namah, ed. Vullers- 

2 References to Arejat-aspa and the Landauer, toI. iii. p. 1495 seq. ; ci- 
HolyWars: Avesta, Yt. 5. 109, 113- tations also made after the French 
117 ; Yt. 19. 87 ; Yt. 9. 29-31 = Yt. 17. translation by Mohl, Le Lime des 
49-51. —Pahlavi, Dk. 7. 4. 77, 83, Bois, iv. 293 seq. (Paris, 1877); cf. 
84, 87-89 ; 7. 5. 7 ; 5. 2. 12 (note by likewise the paraphase by J. Atkinson, 
West) ; 5. 3. 1 (West, p. 126) ; 8. 11. Shah Namah, translated and abridged, 
4 ; 9. 61. 12 ; 4. 21 (West, SBK London and New York, 1886 ; further- 
xxxvii. 412) ; Bd. 12. 82-34 ; Byt. 3. more, VuUers, Fragmente uber Zoroas- 
9 (and 2. 49, note by West) ; Zsp. 23. ter, Bonn, 1831. Pizzi's translation 
8 (all these references are cited ac- was not accessible. — Arabic Writ- 
cording to West's translations in the ers, Tabari, extract quoted by Nbl- 
Sacred Books) ; furthermore, the Pah- deke, Persische Studien, ii. 6-7, and 
lavi Yatkar-I Zariran (which is con- by Gottheil, Beferences to Zoroaster; 
stantly cited from the very useful finally, Mirkhond, History of Persia, 
contribution of Geiger, Das Tdtkdr-i tr. by Shea, pp. 288-295, 313-326. 
Zariran und sein Verhaltnis zum ^ E.g. Bd. 12. 33. 


of the chief inimical power among the heathen ; the Shah Namah 
regards him as the head of Turan, Turkestan, China. 

We have evidence of two distinct invasions by Arj asp's 
forces, although the Avesta does not make clear the fact that 
there were two wars, /^he Pahlavi texts are not so explicit on -- 
the subject as are the Shah Namah and some works, but the 
traditional dates which cover a period of seventeen years, as 
given by the Pahlavi writings, allow the inference of the two 
wars or two invasions. Both these religious conflicts result 
y in victory for Iran ; yet not without severest loss for a time. J 
In the first war, Vishtaspa's brother Zairivairi (Zarer, Zarir) 
and the latter's son Bastavairi (Bastvar, so read for Nastilr)^ 
are the heroes of the fight ; in the second war, Vishtaspa's son 
Isfendiar, by his deeds of marvellous prowess, eclipses even 
the glory of these two heroic combatants. It seems appro- 
priate to give some description of these wars and some dis- 
cussion of the subject because of its bearing upon the early 
history of Zoroastrianism. The sources have already been 
mentioned (pp. 5, 38) ; truly to appreciate the subject one 
ought to read the accounts of tradition, or of fiction as some 
may prefer to call it, in the Yatkar-i Zariran and in the Shah 
Namah, which have been oftenest drawn upon. Here there is 
space merely to give excerpts from their descriptions or to give 
an outline of their contents. 

Outbreak of Hostilities ; Causes and Dates. — If we accept the 
date given by the Zoroastrian tradition, which belongs to the 
time of the Sassanidae, it was some seventeen years after Vish- 
taspa's conversion that the war against Arejat-aspa (Arjasp) 
broke out. The Pahlavi selections, of Zat-sparam state that 
' in the thirtieth year (of the Religion) the Khyons arrive, who 
make an incursion into the countries of Iran.'^ On the basis 
of traditional chronology, as worked out by Dr. E. W. West, 

1 These names belong to the Avesta, * Zsp. 23. 8, tr. West, SBE. xlvii. 

the Pahlavi, and the Shah Namah. 165. 


we may place this event in the year B.C. 601.^ The Shah 
Namah likewise shows that, after the conversion of the king, 
some time must have elapsed before the great war began.^ The 
day of the final battle of this war, it may be added, is given by 
the Yatkar-i Zariran as Farvadin.^ 

'^' As for causes, the ostensible ground for the original difficulty '^ 
was found in Vishtasp's refusal to continue the payment of 
tribute and revenue to Arjasp and in the latter's consequent 
and persistent pressing of his demand. So much, at least, for 
the pretence. The actual ground for difficulty, however, seems 
to have been the religious difference ; for Vishtasp's adoption 
_of the new Faith really lies at the basis of the trouble^ The 
religious question is certainly mixed up with the tribute matter. 
Perhaps one could hardly expect the two to be separated. The 
affair of the tribute is recorded in the Pahlavi Dinkart as well 
as in the Shah Namah.* On the other hand, the Yatkar-i 
Zariran makes the religious issue the main one.* In the Shah 
Namah, when the question comes up, Zoroaster appears prac- 
tically in the position of a cardinal vested with regal power and 
wielding a vigorous hand in matters of state. He urges Gush- 
tasp (Vishtaspa) absolutely to refuse payment of the tax. The 
great Priest's personal interest in the political situation and 
problem to be settled is evidently largely governed by religious 
motives ; Arjasp, it is known, had declined to accept the true 
Faith.s In the Prophet's eyes, therefore, Turan is destined "to 
be damned. Accordingly it is the Powers of Hell itself that 
rise up to inflame Arjasp's fury against Iran. The Dinkart 

1 See "West, 8BE. xlvii. Introd. Zaratusht play a lesser part than 
§ 55, and Appendix III. below. Jamasp who seems rather to be the 

2 Cf. Shah Namah, ed. Vullers- religious adviser of the king. 
Landauer, iii. 1500, cancR rozgSr, and s yz. § 85 (Geiger). 

Mohl, iv. 293, ' quelque temps.' Note * Dk. 7. 4. 77, West, 8BE. xlvii. 

also that Zoroaster is now spoken of 68 ; ShN. tr. Mohl, iv. 293. 

as ' old ' {pir) ; according to tradition ^ YZ. § 1 seq. 

he would have been sixty at the time. ^ ShN. Mohl, iv. pp. 289, 294 ; YZ. 

The Yatkar hardly implies the lapse § 1 seq. 

of so long an interval, and it makes 


believes that no less a personage than Aeshma, the Arch- 
demon of Wrath, conveyed clandestinely to Arjasp the tidings 
of Vishtasp's fixed and unswerving refusal. The statement 
tells the whole story : ' When Vishtasp, accepting the religion, 
praises righteousness, the demons in hell are disabled ; and the 
demon Aeshm (Av. Aeshma) rushes to the country of the 
Khyons and to Arjasp, the deadly one of the Khyons, because 
he was the mightiest of tyrants at that time ; and the most 
hideous of all, of so many of them in the country of the Khyons, 
are poured out by him forjvar.'^ 

Arjasp's Ultimatum. -/^ Arjasp forthwith makes a formal de- 
mand in writing and states the conditions upon which alone 
he will remain at peace ; and he adds an ultimatum to the 
effect that Gushtasp (Vishtaspa) must abandon the new creed 
or be prepared to have the country of Iran invaded within two 
months.'^ The authority for these statements is to be found in 
the Yatkar and in the Shah Namah ; the details of the mes- 
sages, whether fictitious or actual, are preserved in their pur- 
port and intention, at least, in these same works. The names 
of the two messengers whom Arjasp despatches to convey 
this decisive letter have been preserved as Vidrafsh and 
Namkhvast of the Hazars.^ The problem of the location of 
Arejat-aspa's kingdom and of the Hyaonians of the A vesta has 
already been alluded to and it is more fully discussed below in 
Appendix IV.* Here we shall only note that the Shah Namah 
locates the Turanians on the other side of the Oxus and makes 
Arjasp despatch his envoys from the city of Khallakh or Khal- 
lukh to Vishtasp in Balkh. Although Zoroaster was the chief 

1 Dk. 7. 4. 87, tr. West, SBE. Shah Namah, Mohl, iv. 298, and Yat- 
xlvii. 72, and see Dk. 8. 11. 4, 'the kar, § 12. 

demon of wrath.' Compare also the " YZ. § 2 (Geiger, p. 47), ShN. 

mention of ' wrath ' in Byt. 3. 9, West, Mohl, iv. p. 300. See also Dk. 7. 4. 

SBE. V. 218. The Shah Namah has 77, 'the deputed envoys of Arjasp 

narrah Dim, ShN. iii. 1500, ed. Vul- . . . who demand tribute and revenue'; 

lers-Landauer ; cf. Mohl, iv. 293. sah va-bdlb (West, 8BE. xlvii. 68). 

2 On the time ' two months ' see * See p. 123 seq. 


instigator of the trouble between the two rulers,^ it is not 
unnatural, perhaps, that we find Jamasp assuming the chief 
role as counsellor, for he was prime minister, chancellor, and 
grand vizir.^ On the receipt of the arrogant message, Vish- 
tasp's warlike brother Zarir (At. Zairivairi, Phi., Mod. P. 
Zarer, Zarir) at once steps forward and boldly hurls defiance 
in the face of Arjasp's messengers ; he endites in response a 
stern letter, to which the king gives approval, and he hands it 
to the envoys to deliver on their return.^ War is forthwith 

First Invasion of Arjasp, and the Holy War. — The Dinkart 
states that the missing Vishtasp-sasto Nask of the Avesta con- 
tained an account of ' the outpouring of Arjasp the Khyon, by 
the demon of "Wrath, for war with Vishtasp and disturbance of 
ZaratHsht; the arrangements and movements of King Vishtasp 
for that war, and whatever is on the same subject.'* This 
brief but clear outline makes us regret the more keenly the 
loss of so interesting a book of the Avesta. But doubtless con- 
siderable of the material has actually been preserved, as in 
other cases, in the Pahlavi and later Persian literature ; and this 
fact lends more weight to the statements of the Pahlavi Yat- 
kar-i Zariran and of the Shah Namah as being actually based 
on old foundations and therefore worthy of real consideration. 
This should be kept in mind in the following pages and in the 
descriptions which they present. 

The Yatkar-i Zariran and the Shah Namah both give vivid 
pictures, with imaginative coloring, of the marshalling of the 
forces and the numbers of the opposing hosts. As is common 
even in modern historical records, the estimates of the number 
of men actually under arms differ considerably. For Arjasp's 

1 Dk. 8. 11. 4, ' the outpouring of » YZ. §§ 10-13 (Geiger, pp. 49-50) ; 

Arjasp the Khyon, ty the demon of ShN. Mohl, iv. 301-303. 
wrath, for -war with Vishtasp and * Dk, 8. 11. 4, West, 8BE. xxxvii. 

disturbance of Zaratiisht.' 24. 

2YZ. § 3 (Geiger, p. 48); ShN. 
Mohl, iv. pp. 300-317. 


army one section of the Yatkar gives the number as 131,000 
men.i The Shah Namah is not so explicit, but puts the 
forces of the two wings of Arjasp's host, and of the reserve, 
at 300,000, without including the main body of the army.^ 
On the other side Vishtasp's army is actually estimated by 
the Yatkar at 144,000 men,^ although it once speaks as if the 
number were innumerable ; * whereas in the Shah Namah the 
strength is merely stated in a vague way as 1000 x 1000.^ 

Arjasp's Army and its Leaders. — The tradition upon which 
Firdausi, or rather Dakiki, based his poetic chronicle is consis- 
tent throughout with respect to making the city of Khallakh 
the place from which Arjasp set out upon his campaign. 
Again we miss the lost Vishtasp-sasto Nask of the Avesta 
alluded to above ! The poet is even able to give the order in 
which Arjasp arranged his troops for the invading march. 
This differs considerably from the actual plan of marshalling 
his forces and commanders when in battle array; but even a 
poet would recognize the likelihood of changes and alterations 
according to the exigencies of the campaign and situation. 
On the march the troops were disposed of in the order given 
in the diagram on page 110.^ 

The advance guard is entrusted to Khashash. The two 
wings are assigned respectively to Arjasp's own brothers Kuh- 
ram and Andariman (cf. Av. Vandaremaini) with three hun- 
dred thousand picked men. The chief in command is given to 
Gurgsar, while the flag is entrusted to Bidrafsh. Arjasp him- 
self occupies the centre for safety and convenience; and Hiish- 
div brings up the rear. 

As already noted, the above line of march, however, differs 

1 YZ. § 46, but a few lines farther ^ ghN. Mohl, iv. pp. 306, 319. 

on (§ 50) tlie number is mentioned as ' YZ. § 49. 

12,000,000 (probably a mistake in a * YZ. § 16. 

figure). Tbe prose Shah Namah Nasr ^ ghN. Mohl, iv. 308. 

mentions Arjasp's conscription as ' See ShN. Mohl, iv. 306 (line of 

'15,000 men' ; cf. Hyde, Hist. Belig. march), opposed to iv. 319 (order of 

p. 325 (1 ed.). battle). 




(According to the Shah Namah) i 

(with advance guard) 

(with banner) 

(chief in command) 








1— ( 

(with rear guard) 

1 See preceding note ; and, on the proper names, see Justi, Iran. Namenbuch, 
as follows : Xaiai, p. 171 ; Gurgsar, p. 122 ; Bidrafl (Widrafi), p. 368 ; Anda- 
riman (Wandaremainii), p. 347; Kuhram, p. 166; HTadiv (^HoSdew), p. 131; 
Arjdsp, p. 21. 


from the arrangement of the forces in action on the field of 
battle. According to the picturesque account which is given 
in the Shah Namah, we can imagine Arjasp's forces drawn up 
in battle array in the manner indicated below. From the 
descriptions of the engagement it is evident that in Oriental 
fights, as often elsewhere, single deeds of great daring by brill- 
iant leaders gain the day rather than combined efforts and the 
manoeuvring of massed troops. We may conceive of the fort- 
unes of the battle as guided by Ormazd and by Ahriman. 
The description in the Shah Namah may indeed be poetic or 
journalistic, but it is worth reading, and the array of the 
enemy appeared as follows : ^ — 


(According to the Shah Namah)" 

Bidrafsh Gurgsar 


Arjasp with Namkhvast' 


Chosen troops 



(with rear guard) 

Bidrafsh and Gurgsar are given charge of the two wings 
with 100,000 men each. Namkhvast with picked troops has 

1 See Mohl, iv. p. 319 (and contrast 122 ; Bidrafi (Widraft), p. 368 ; Nd- 
with iv. p. 306). mxvdst, p. 220; Kuhram, p. 166; 

2 See preceding note ; and, for the Arjasp, p. 21. 

proper names, compare Justi, Iran. ^ Cf. ShN. Mohl, iv. 313, 319. 

Namenhuch, as follows : Qurgsdr, p. 


the centre where Arjasp himself is stationed.^ The reserve of 
100,000 men is disposed in such a way as to support all the 
divisions. This time Kuhram ^ guards the rear, whereas Hushdiv 
had held that position on the invading march. Among Arjasp's 
leaders only two are really known to fame in the conflict: these 
are Namkhvast and Bidrafsh.^ 

' Vishtasp's Army and its Leaders. — The strength of Vish- 
taspa's forces has already been mentioned. The three prin- 
cipal heroes who win renown on the Iranian side are, first, 
Vishtasp's intrepid brother, the valiant Zarir (Av. Zairivairi, 
YZ. Zarer, ShN. Zarir) ; * second, the latter's son Bastvar (Av. 
Bastavairi, YZ. Bastvar, ShN. Nastiir);^ and third, Vishtaspa's 
own glorious son Isfendiar (Av. Spento-data, YZ. ShN. Isfen- 
diar).^ In the Yatkar, mention is likewise made of another of 
Vishtaspa's brothers, named Pat-khusrav,'^ and also of a favor- 
ite son of Vishtasp whose name apparently is Frashokart or 
Frashavart.^ The Shah Namah furthermore mentions Arda- 
shir, who is a son of Vishtaspa, Shero or (according to Mohl) 

1 ShN. Mohl, iv, 313, 319. In YZ. name, Darmesteter, Le ZA. ii. 532, 
§ 50, Arjasp, like Vishtasp, has his suggested Av. Bujasravah, Yt. 13. 101, 
place of observation upon a hill to but this is doubtful. 

direct the battle. 8 yz. §30 (text corrupt), 39, 44. 

2 The name of Arjasp's brother. As the MS. at § 30 is corrupt (cf. 
Kuhram or Q-uhram, appears as Go- Geiger, p. 75), one might think of Av. 
hormus in Tabari ; see Noldeke, Per- Frashokara (Yt. 13. 102), which is the 
sische Studien, ii. 7, 8 ; Justi Iran. reading of all good Avestan MSS. {not 
Namenhuch, p. 112. If Kuhram ac- Fraslio-kardta, as Geiger, YZ. p. 75) ; 
cepted Shedasp's challenge (ShN. but West (personal communication) 
Mohl, iv. pp. 321, 322), he must have thinks they are all the same name. As 
come forward from the rear. Frash . . . falls in this battle, we must 

8 YZ. §§ 29-30, and § 54 seq. ; ShN. not (as does Darmesteter, Le ZA. ii. 

Mohl, iv. 319, 323, 327. 533) confuse him with Farshldvard, 

* Cf . Justi, Iran. Namenhuch, p. of the Shah Namah, who does not fall 

382. now, but is slain in the second battle. 

^ Cf. Justi, Iran. Namenhuch, p. 65. Possibly it might be Av. Frash-hgm- 

"Cf. Justi, Iran. Namenhuch, p. vareta (Yt. 13. 102) if we set aside 

308. Darmesteter's connection with Pers. 

' YZ. §§ 29, 37 ; he is apparently Farshldvard. In any case Justi, Iran. 

not named in the Avesta ; cf. Geiger, Namenhuch, p. 104 should be con- 

Yatkar-i Zarirdn, p. 77. For his suited. 


Ormazd,^ Shedasp,^ Garami, the son of Jainasp,^ Nevzar, son of 
Vishtasp,* Bashutan (i.e. Peshotanu), son of Vishtasp,^ and a 
son of Isfendiar called Nush-Adar (i.e. Anosh-Adar) who is 
killed by Zavarah in the second war.^ The valiant Isfendiar 
appears in all accounts of both wars. He is evidently com- 


(According to the Shah Namah)' 

(Shedasp) Isfendiar 


Number not given 


Bastvar, i.e. Nastur 
(in charge of rear) 

paratively young in the first war, and his renown as hero 
belongs rather to the second great action; but in both cam- 

1 Cf. Justi, Iran. Nameribuch, p. 
297, Mohl, iv. 321. 

2 Son of Vishtasp, Mohl, iv. 311, 
318, 321 ; Justi, p. 294. 

8 ShN. Mohl, iv. pp. 311, 312, 323, 
and see next page. 

4 ShN. Mohl, iv. pp. 312, 324. 

6 ShN. Mohl, iv. 332, Justi, Iran. 
Namenbuch, p. 251. Mentioned also 
by Tabari in this connection (Tab. i. 

676 f. ; cf. Noldeke, Pers. Stud. ii. p. 


6 ShN. Mohl, iv. pp. 338, 349 ; Justi, 
Iran. Nameniuch, p. 176, 337 {Uz- 

'' See preceding note ; and, on the 
proper names, see Justi, Iran Namen- 
buch, as follows : Zairivairi, p. 382 ; 
Isfendiar, p. 308 ; Shedasp, p. 294 ; 
Bastavairi, p. 65. 


paigns he is the same ideal hero, sans peur et sans reproche. 
Twenty-two other sons of the family of Vishtaspa are slain 
according to the Yatkar-i Zariran (§ 29), but this treatise does 
not seem to take account of the second holy war against 
Arjasp. The Shah Namah makes the number of Vishtasp's 
sons that were slain to have been thirty-eight,^ but this num- 
ber on the other hand seems to comprise both wars. On the 
field of battle Vishtasp's troops, according to the Shah Namah, 
were drawn up as presented in the preceding table.^ We must 
regret once more that we have not the missing Vishtasp-sasto 
Nask which the Dinkart says described ' the arrangement and 
movements of King Vishtasp for that war.' 

Battles of the First War. — The location of the seat of war in 
the first great conflict is not wholly clear. The Shah Namah 
speaks of the Jihiin or Oxus — see Map ; the Yatkar-i Zariran 
seems to allude to Merv (also in the northeast) as the seat, but 
the text is not precise on the subject. The whole question is 
discussed below in Appendix IV., reference to which should be 

It is evident, in this first war, that there were two principal 
battles, separated by a slight interval; some of the apparent 
differences and discrepancies between the Yatkar and the Shah 
Namah are possibly to be accounted for in that way. As to the 
interval, the Shah Namah recognizes a lapse of two weeks 
Qdu TiaftaK) between the first attack by Arjasp and the combat 
which resulted in Zarir's death. ^ As to the action, the Yatkar-i 
Zariran naturally selects those situations and incidents which 
bring its hero Zarir into the foreground. Both accounts tell 
how, on the eve of battle, the sage Jamasp in prophetic vision 
foresees all the gains and all the losses on each side ; and he fore- 
tells to the king the joys and sorrows, the temporary defeat, but 
final, conclusive, and decisive victory of the following day.* 

1 MoU, iv. 367, 376, 386, 445. * YZ. §§ 28-30 ; ShN. iii. 1514-1521 ; 

2 See p. 113, and cf. Mohl, iv. 318. cf. Mohl, iv. 309-317. 
ShN. iii. 1527, du haftah ; cf. 

MoU, iv. 325. 


Vishtasp beholds the fight from a neighboring elevation.^ In the 
first action a number fall on the side of the Zoroastrian faith. 
Several of the names may be gathered ; they are mostly sons 
of the king : Ardashir, Ormazd (or Shero), Shedasp, Nevzar, 
Pat-khusrav, and Frashavart(?).^ Most of these are slain by 
the listful demon Namkhvast. Of all the descriptions, one of 
the most picturesque, perhaps, is the account of the chivalrous 
deed of Jamasp's indomitable son Garami (YZ. Garamik-kart). 
In a moment of critical suspense he rescues the imperial banner 
by an act of heroism which is all-inspiring, and he saves the gon- 
falon, holding it between his teeth, and fights till he falls. ^ 

The second and decisive battle follows this first sharp engage- 
ment after a brief interval. In this action there is no question 
that the hero is Zarir (Zarer, Zairivairi). He does not fall in 
open attack, but by an act of stealth at the hand of the sorcerer 
Bidrafsh, whom he had challenged to mortal combat. Zarir's 
unfortunate death is gloriously avenged by his young son 
Bastvar (Nastiir) and by the valiant Isfendiar. In the words 
of the Yatkar-i Zariran, as the battle opens, ' the dashing leader 
Zarir began the fight as fiercely as when the god of Fire bursts 
into a hay-rick and is impelled onward by a blast of the storm. 
Each time as he struck his sword down, he killed ten Khyons ; 
and, as he drew it back, he slew eleven. When hungry and 
thirsty he needed only to look upon the blood of the Khyons and 
he became refreshed. ' * But treachery, as before stated, undoes 
the noble knight ; he falls, pierced through the heart by a 
poisoned spear hurled from behind by the magician Vidrafsh 
(Vedrafsh, Bidrafsh) who is promised the fair hand of Arjasp's 
daughter Zarshtan as a reward.^ The hero fallen, Vishtasp 
now turns and offers his own lovely daughter Humak (Hiimai) 

1 YZ. § 49 ; ShN. Mohl, iv. 320. s yZ. § 79 ; ShN. iv. 323, 311-12 ; 

2 List made up from ShK iii. 1523 see also Geiger, Ydtkdr, p. 79. 
seq. ; cf. MoM, iv. 311, 321 ; and YZ. « YZ. § 51 (Geiger, pp. 59-60). 
§§29-30. Compare also Justi.JVamcn- *= YZ. §§ 52-56 (after Geiger, pp. 
buch, p. 229 {Newndr), and tlie refer- 60-61); of. SliN. Molil, iv. 327, 328. 
ences given above, p. 113. See also Noldelje, Pers. Stud. ii. 3. 


to whosoever will avenge Zarir's death. ^ The latter's youthful 
son Bastvar (Nastur), a child in years but a giant in strength 
and courage, dashes forward and, accompanied by Isfendlar, 
slays the treacherous Vidrafsh, routs the Turanian hosts, hews 
them down as he drives them before him, and with Isfendiar's 
aid sends Arjasp defeated, humbled, mutilated, back to his own 

The gallant Isfendiar now grants respite to the vanquished 
Turanians, which is in keeping with the nobility of his charac- 
ter, although his soldiers, as the poet describes, were inclined 
to butcher the entire army of refugees.^ The Shah Namah is 
able to give the numbers of those who fell in battle. Of Vish- 
tasp's forces the number of the slain is estimated at 30,000 
including thirty-eight sons of the king.* On Arjasp's side the 
list of those who were killed is reckoned to be more than 
100,000. With the boldness of precision worthy of an epic 
writer who is giving details, the poet is able to add that 1163 
of this number were men of rank, beside 3200 wounded.^ 
Terms of peace with religious stipulations are entered into and 
the first great victory of Zoroastrianism is achieved. 

The war over, Vishtasp marches back through his own coun- 
try of Iran to the city of Balkh, to celebrate the victory. In 
Persian fashion he is said to have given his daughter Humai to 
the intrepid Isfendiar,® and he assigns to this young hero 
Bastvar (Nastiir) an army of 100,000 picked soldiers, bidding 
him to advance toward Arjasp's capital, Khallakh, in order to 
complete the conquest. One other son, Farshidvard,^ is made 
suzerain over Khorassan, the territory which afterwards becomes 
famous as a seat of the second holy war against Arjasp. Vish- 
tasp himself next founds a new fire-temple and makes Jamasp 

1 YZ. § 57 ; ShN. Mohl, iv. 330, (p. 114) wMoh explains this number 

341. as referring to both the wars. 

2YZ. §§ 58-85 (Geiger, pp. 62-69) ; » ShN. Mohl, iv. 341. 

ShN. Mohl, 835-341. e yz. § 57 seq. implies Bastvar ; 

8 ShN. Mohl, iv. 339. see above, p. 72, n. 1. 

1 But see the statement given above ' ShN. Mohl, iv. 345. 


high priest over it. His final and most important act for the 
Religion is to depute the dauntless Isfendiar upon a hallowed 
mission, a great crusade to foreign lands, enjoining upon him 
to convert all peoples and nations to the Faith of Zardusht. 
When this is accomplished he promises to recompense the valiant 
crusader and dutiful son by awarding him the crown and throne 
of Iran. 

Isfendiar as Crusader, and the Following Events. — Tradition 
tells how fortune favors the gallant knight. So successful is 
his pious zeal, according to the Shah Namah, that the countries 
even of ' Rum and Hindiistan ' are among those who despatched 
messengers to Vishtasp, requesting to have 'the Zend-Avesta 
of Zardusht ' sent to them. Vishtasp eagerly complies with the 
request and sends a copy of the bible to every land.^ An 
allusion to the Dinkart of crusading efforts in the direction of 
' Ariim and the Hindiis ' in connection with the name of Spend- 
dat (Isfendiar) has already been noticed above. 

There must have been a considerable lapse of time for all 
this to transpire, and a number of the events narrated in the 
chapters on conversions and the spread of the Religion perhaps 
belong here.^ The interval of peace at home was doubtless 
used to advantage ; and possibly about this time the Avesta 
was written down by Jamasp from the teachings of Zoroaster 
as referred to in the Dinkart.^ All goes well. Each effort of 
Isfendiar is divinely crowned, and at last he feels himself 
entitled by his successes to turn to his father with the expecta- 
tion of receiving the crown according to the royal promise. 
But he receives it not. A mischievous brother, Kurazm 
(Av. Kavarazem, Yt. 13. 103) * with lying lips calumniates the 
valiant hero to his father. Isfendiar is rewarded by being 

1 ShN. MoM, iv. 344-345. Cf. pp. 76, 97. "West places this event 

2 The Shah Namah implies an in- about b.c. 591. See 8BE. xlvii. In- 
terval of ' some time ' ; see ShN. iii. trod. § 55, and Appendix III. below. 
1543,Vullers-Landauer = Mohl,iv.345, « ShN. Mohl, iv. 346; Justi, Iran. 
'quelque temps.' Namenbuch, p. 159; Darmesteter, 

3 Dk. 4. 21 ; 5. 3. 4 ; 7. 5. 11 ; 3. 7. 1. JStudes Iran. ii. 280. 


thrown into chains and imprisoned upon a mountain in the 
fortress citadel of Gumbadan in Khorassan or Mount Spento- 
data of the Avesta and Biindahishn as described below in 
Appendix IV. The Shah Namah goes on to tell how King 
Vishtasp (Gushtasp) leaves Balkh shortly after this incident 
and goes for ' two years ' to Seistan and Zabiilistan to visit 

It is at this point in the Shah Namah that the narrative of 
Firdausi's predecessor Dakiki is stated to end, and the story is 
taken up by Firdausi himself. This fact may account for 
certain differences of view and manner of treatment which are 

Arjasp's Second Invasion ; the Last Holy War. — The 
chronicle of the Shah Namah, as poetic history, seems to allow 
some years to elapse between the invasions of Arjasp as already 
mentioned, and the traditional Zoroastrian chronology bears 
out this fact if we combine the dates which may be gathered.^ 
The state of affairs in Iran begins to assume a different aspect. 
The Turanian Arjasp, taking advantage of Isfendiar's im- 
prisoment, reunites his forces and prepares to strike a blow of 
retaliation upon his former conqueror. y'Once more he invades 
Iran and the second war begins. The tradition which Firdausi 
follows is claimed by him to be ancient. It is curious, how- 
ever, in some of its details, and it presents an odd picture of 
the management of a kingdom. Vishtasp's absence from his 
capital seems to have left Balkh weakened or unprotected. 
Arjasp successfully storms the city ; the aged Lohrasp falls in 
the fight before the city walls ; ^ the temple of Niish-Adar is 
sacked and destroyed ; the priests are slain in the very act of 
their pious worship ; the sacred fire is quenched by their 

1 On the Dakiki portion of the Shah to have occurred during the Turanian 
Namah, cf. p. 5, n. 2, andseeNbldelcein invasion, as discussed ia the next 
Grundriss der iran. Philol. ii. 148-150. chapter. 

2 The date of Zoroaster's death Is * Shah Namah, Vullers-Landauer, 
set at B.C. 583, and this is supposed iii. 1560 ; Mohl, iv. 364, 558. 


hallowed blood ; and, worst of all, the Prophet Zardusht falls 
a martyr at the hands of the murderous and fanatical invaders 
of Turan, as he stands in the presence of the altar's holy- 
flame which the Faith so devoutly cherished. The details of 
these particular circumstances are given more fully in the next 
chapter, together with some additional traditions regarding 
Zoroaster's death. This sad event serves to place the date of 
the second war at about B.C. 583 on the basis of the Bunda- 
hishn chronology.^ , 

Events now follow in rapid succession. Vishtasp learns in 
Seistan of the death of Lohrasp and of the martyrdom of 
Zoroaster. He hastens to join forces with his son, Farshid- 
vard of Khorassan. The Shah Namah states that Vishtasp 
took the route towards Balkh, but from its description and 
from a Pahlavi allusion to the ' White Forest,' as discussed 
hereafter, it appears that Vishtasp joined Farshidvard in Kho- 
rassan, of which the latter was suzerain. We may recall here 
that Firdausi himself was a native of Khorassan and he must 
have been familiar with the tradition. The question of the 
scene of this opening battle is entered into more fully below in 
Appendix IV. So it need not be discussed here. We need 
only follow Firdausi's brief description of the drawing up of 
the opposing lines, and if we glance at Khorassan on the Map 
we shall have an idea, at least traditionally, of the battlefields 
on which the final victory of Zoroastrianism was won. 

Alas ! the valiant Isfendiar is no longer in command of the 
host that is fighting for the Avesta and the Faith of Iran. The 
princely Farshidvard receives a wound that shortly proves 
fatal. Vishtasp is routed, and he finds refuge only in the 
region of Nishapiir or of the Jagatai chain, as discussed in 
detail below. Appendix IV. The Iranians are beleagured on 
a lonely height ; the Faith of Zoroaster seems about to totter 
and fall before the hated Arjasp and Turan. But Isfendiar is 

1 See note above, and compare West, SBE. xlvii. Introd. § 55, and Appen- 
dix III. below. 



once more the saviour of the hour. In the dire emergency 
it is universally felt that the captive prince, chained within the 
fortress which even in the Avesta has given his name to the 

(According to the Shah Namah)i 
Ikan Tukan 





mountain, can save the State from its impending overthrow. 
According to the Chronicle, Jamasp secretly visits Isfendiar, 

1 ShN. Mohl, iv. 365, 366, 387. On 
the special proper names, see Justl, 
Iran. Namenbuch under FraSh(}m- 
varota, p. 104 (but recall discussion of 

the name ahove, p. 112, n. 8) ; Bastvar, 
Justi, p. 65. 

2 ShN. Mohl, iv. 366, 387. 


and finally induces him to forget his cruel wrongs and to 
preserve his country from the certain ruin that hangs over it. 
Freed from the galling shackles, he hastens to the rescue and 
leads the hosts of Zoroastrianism once more to victory. Under 
the inspiration of his command a final battle is begun. 
Isfendiar receives full power and sway. The only change in 
the organization of Vishtasp's forces, as noted in the Shah 
Namah, is that Gurdoe (Kerdui) succeeds to the place of 
Farshidvard, who had died from the fatal wound received in 
the preceding fight, and Bastvar (Nastiir) consequently occu- 
pies the right wing.^ Arjasp's troops are marshalled in a 
manner differing but slightly from that before adopted. The 
disposition of the armies, as given by Firdausi, is shown in 
the diagram on page 122. 

Isfendiar wins a complete and signal victory. Arjasp flees 
back to Turan. But no quarter this time is granted. His 
country is mercilessly invaded by the invincible Isfendiar, his 
capital stormed and taken, and he himself is finally slain. 
The Dinkart likewise in one passage seems to contain an echo 
of the note of exultation over this event.^ Victory rests every- 
where upon the banners of Iran and upon the triumphant stan- 
dards of Zoroaster's Faith. 

Thus closed the second invasion of the great Holy War, 
which really served to establish the future of Zoroastrianism, 
for the Faith gained strength from the shock it withstood and 
the power it overcame. According to tradition, victory led 
to other attempts at universal conversion, but not all were 
unqualifiedly successful. The gallant Isfendiar, so zealous ever 
for the cause, is himself ultimately slain in single combat with 
Rustam, whom he sought to convert to the creed in accordance 
with King Vishtasp's urgent desire and his own unflagging 
readiness for crusading. The story which Firdausi tells of 

1 On Gurdoe (Kerdui), see ShN. ^ See Dk. 7. 4. 88-90, in West's 

Mohl, iv. 384 ; Justi, Iran. Namen- translation, 8BE. xlvii. 72-73. 
huch, pp. 122, 161. 



the details of Isfendiar's death may be apocryphal, but it con- 
tains some reminiscence of the missionary labors that are 
known to have been expended in the land of Seistan. 


(According to tlie Shah Namah) i 
Iran Tuean 

10 1^ 


!,-< lea 



The Sacred Wars summarized. — Such is the story of the 
period of holy warfare against Areiat-aspa (Arjasp) in behalf 

1 ShN. Mohl, iv. 384. For the proper names, see references above. 


of Zoroaster's Faith, at least so far as we can gather history 
from sources which are chiefly chronicles. In the Avesta and 
in the Pahlavi writings Arejat-aspa is a Hyaonian (Ay. H'ya- 
ona, Phi. Khyon); in the Shah Namah and elsewhere he is 
understood to be a Turanian. Both designations apparently 
amount ultimately to the same thing. Furthermore, according 
to tradition, there were two separate wars or invasions by 
Arjasp, although the earliest accounts do not make this point 
wholly clear. If we accept the Zoroastrian chronology based 
upon the Pahlavi Biindahishn, the defeat of Arjasp in the first 
war must have occurred about B.C. 601. The principal battle 
of this war was the fight in which King Vislitasp's brother 
Zarir was slain. A considerable interval, nearly twenty years, 
is believed to have elapsed before Arjasp began his second 
invasion. The date of this event is placed by the tradition as 
about B.C. 583, the year being given by the death of Zoroaster 
which seems to have occurred at this time. The amphitheatre 
in which the final engagements in this war took place appears 
to be Khorassan. Isf endiar, the great crusader, wins the final 
victory that establishes the Faith of Iran on a firm foundation, 
even though Zoroaster is no longer living to enjoy the fruits 
of triumph. 




' Shall the priest and the prophet be slain in the sanctuary of the Lord ? ' 

— Lamentations 2. 20. 

Inteoduction — Greek and Latin Accounts op Zokoaster's Death bt 
Lightning ok a Flame trom Heaven — The Iranian Tradition of his 
Death at the Hand of an Enemy — Conclusion 

Introduction. — Those who have read Marion Crawford's 
novel ' Zoroaster ' may perhaps recall the graphic scene describ- 
ing the death of the Prophet of ancient Iran, with which the 
romance closes. Whatever may have been the novelist's 
source of information — if he had any source beyond his own 
vivid imagination — his picture is so well drawn that it seems 
real, and it may possibly not be so far, after all, from the truth. 
There is no authority, however, for believing that Zoroaster's 
death took place at Stakhar (Persepolis) ; but there is ground 
for believing that he may possibly have been slain while at 
worship in the sanctuary. Traditions on the subject differ; but 
it is the purpose of this chapter briefly to bring together the 
material that is accessible on the question of Zoroaster's death. 

Greek and Latin Accounts of Zoroaster's Death. — From 
the fate of Empedocles we are not surprised to find a miracu- 
lous departure attributed to a great sage; and the Greek and 
Latin patristic writers give a fabulous account of the passing 
of Zoroaster. His is no ordinary end; he perishes by lightning 
or a flame from heaven, which recalls the descent of the fiery 
chariot and the whirlwind in the apotheosis of Elijah. For 



such a description our principal source is the Pseudo-Clemen- 
tine Recognitiones and the spurious Clementine Homilies, whose 
statements are followed by later writers. All these passages 
are given in Appendix V., so they are simply summarized here.^ 

(a) A passage in the Clementinae Recognitiones (dating 
about A.D. second century, and existing in the Latin trans- 
lation of Rufinus),^ identifies Zoroaster with Ham or Mesraim 
of the family of Noah, and anathematizes him as a magician 
and astrologer. To deceive the people, it is said, he was wont 
to conjure the stars until finally the guardian spirit or presid- 
ing genius of a certain star became angry at his control and 
emitted a stream of fire in vengeance and slew the arch- 
magician. But the misguided Persians deified the ashes of his 
body consumed by the flame, and they gave adoration to the 
star which had thus charioted him into the presence of God. 
Hence after his death he received the name Zoroaster, that is, 
' living star,' — an interpretation by those who understood the 
Greek form of his name to have this meaning ! ^ 

(b) The statement in the spurious Clementine Homilies * dif- 
fers but slightly. Zoroaster is identified with Nimrod, who, 
in the pride of his heart, seeks for universal power from the 
star, whereat the lightning falls from heaven and Nimrod is 
destroyed, and he accordingly receives the surname Zoroaster 
for the 'stream of the star': Z(opodaTpr)<; fjteravofjbdaOr], Sia 
TO TTjP rov acrrepo'! kut' airov ^coaav evekdrfvai porjV. But 
the Persians, it is added, built a temple over the remains of 
his body and cherished the sacred flame that came from the 

1 The best material on tUs subject, ^For the text, cf. Appendix V., 
from the classical side, is to be found § 12. 

in "Windisohmann, Zoroastrische Stu- * Clem. Homilies, 9. 4 seq. (torn. ii. 

dien, pp. 306-309 (accessible now in col. 244, ed, Migne) ; see Appendix V. , 

translation, Darab D. P. Sanjana, Zar- § 12, and cf. Windischmann, Zor. 

athushtra in the Gathds, pp. 131-135). Stud. pp. 306-307 = Darab D. P. San- 

2 Clem. Roman. Becogn. 4. 27-29 jana, Zarathushtra in the Gdthds, p. 
(torn. i. col. 1326 seq. ed. Migne). See 133, and Eapp, ZDMG. xix. p. 34. 
Appendix v., § 12. 


coals of the heaven-sent bolt; and so long as they did this 
they had sovereignty. Then the Babylonians stole away the 
embers and thereby gained empire over the world. ^ 

(c) Gregory of Tours (a.d. 538-593)^ repeats the identi- 
fication of Zoroaster with Ham (Cham, or Chus) and records 
the etymology of his name as 'living star,' stating that the 
Persians worshipped him as a god because he was consumed 
by fire from heaven. See Appendix V., § 37. 

(d) The Chronicon Paschale or Chronicon Alexandrinum 
(last date a.d. 629) ^ makes Zoroaster foretell his fiery death, 
and bid the Persians to preserve the ashes of his charred bones. 
As he is praying to Orion, he is slain by the descent of a heav- 
enly shaft, and the Persians carefully keep his ashes down to 
the present time. See text in Appendix V., § 39. 

The same story is found in almost the same words, or with 
no material addition (see Appendix V., § 39) in the works of 

(e) Johan. Malalas (a.d. sixth century) col. 84, ed. Migne; 
p. 18 ed. Bonnenn. 

(f ) Suidas (a. D. tenth century), s.v. Za)podcTTpr]<}, ' Ao-tjooz/o'/ho?, 
briefly records the death by fire from heaven. 

(g) Georgius Cedrenus (c. A.D. 1100), tells the same in his 
Sistoriarum Compendium (col. 57, ed. Migne ; p. 29 seq. ed. 
Bonnenn.), and adds, to, \eC-^ava avTov Bia Tifir]<; elxov ol Ylepaai 
eo)? Tovrov KaTa<ppov7](7avTe^ koI ttj? ^acriKela<i i^errecrov. 

(h) Michael Glycas (flor. c. a.d. 1150), Ann. Pars II. (col. 
253, ed. Migne ; p. 244 ed. Bonnenn.), simply repeats the 
Clementine statement. See Appendix V., § 47. 

(i) Georgius Hamartolus (d. about A.D. 1468) merely reiter- 
ates the same in his Chronology (col. 56, ed. Migne). 

All these latter quotations go back to the Clementine source. 

1 For the full text, see Appendix v., Migne; or i. p. 67, ed. Bonnenn.; cf. 

§ 12. 'Windisohinann, Zor. Stud. p. 308 note 

^ Hist. Francor. 1. 6 (col. 164 seq. = Darab D. P. Sanjana, Zarathushtra 

ed. Migne). in the GdtMs, p. 135. 

' Chron. Fasch. col. 148 seq. ed. 


They all look upon Zoroaster as an astrologer who perished by 
a shaft from heaven, and they usually interpret this as a mark 
of divine displeasure. 

It might be added, simply by way of greater completeness, 
that Orosius (a.d. fifth century) Hist. i. 4 (col. 700, ed. 
Migne) follows the current later classical story about Ninus 
and Zoroaster, and adds that Ninus conquered and killed him 
in battle, which perhaps is an echo of the war against Arjasp.^ 

The Iranian Tradition of Zoroaster's Death. — Passing from 
the realm of fanciful legend to the more solid ground of tradi- 
tion we have a very persistent statement in the later Zoro- 
astrian sacred writings regarding the death of the Prophet, 
even if, for reasons to be easily understood, that event is not 
mentioned in the Avesta itself.^ This tradition with absolute 
uniformity makes his death to have occurred at the age of sev- 
enty-seven years, and ascribes it to a Turanian, one Bratrok- 
resh.3 Whether this occurred at the storming of Balkh or 
under other circumstances, wUl be discussed below. For the 
latest accessible material on the subject we may refer especially 
to West, SBE. xlvii. According to the Pahlavi selections of 
Zat-sparam, Zoroaster passed away at the age of seventy-seven 
years and forty days in the 47th-48th year of the religion, or 
B.C. 583, of the Iranian chronology.* The month and the day 
are specifically named, as will be recorded below. The state- 
ment of his age being seventy-seven years is repeated else- 
where,^ and the name of his murderer occurs a number of 
times as the foUovidng passages will show. 

(a) The Selections of Zat-sparam, 23. 9 (West, SBH. xlvii. 
165) contain the following entry : ' In the forty-seventh year 

iPor the text, see Appendix V., * See West's calculations given in 

§ 27. Appendix III,, p. 181, and consult the 

2 See also Geldner, ' Zoroaster ' in next paragraph. 

Encyclopxdia Britannica, xxiv. 821, ^ E.g. Masudi, as given in Appendix 

col. a. 11., p. 163. 

3 Cf. also Justi, Iran. Namenbuch, 
p. 71. 


(of the Religion) Zaratiisht passes away, wlio attains seventy- 
seven years and forty days, in the month Artavahishto, on the 
day Khiir ; and for eight rectified months, till the month 
Dadvo and day Khiir, he should be brought forward as to be 
reverenced.' The day of his death, according to tradition, is 
the day Khiir in the month Artavahishto, on the eleventh day 
of the second month of the Zoroastrian year.^ 

(b) In Dinkart, 7. 5. 1 (West, SBE. xlvii. 73) we read, 
' About the marvellousness which is manifested from the accept- 
ance of the Religion by Vishtasp onwards till the departure 
(ylxezo) of Zaratiisht, whose guardian spirit is reverenced, to 
the best existence, when seventy-seven years had elapsed on- 
wards from his birth, forty-seven onwards from his conference, 
and thirty-five years onwards from the acceptance of the 
Religion by Vishtasp.' 

(c) Dinkart, 7. 6. 1 (West, SBE. xlvii. 77) speaks, among 
other miracles, ' About the marvellousness which is manifested 
after the departure (ylxezo') of Zaratiisht, whose guardian 
spirit is reverenced, to the best existence (i.e. Heaven), and 
manifested also in the lifetime of Vishtasp.' 

(d) Datistan-i Dinik, 72. 8 (West, SBE. xviii. 218) states 
that among the most heinous sinners, ' one was Tiir-i Bratar- 
vakhsh, the Karap and heterodox wizard, by whom the best 
of men [i.e. Zaratusht] was put to death.' If this be the same 
Karap that plotted against Zoroaster as a youth, it would 
imply an extraordinary longevity (p. 28, n. 4). 

(e) Dinkart 5. 3. 2 (West, SBE. xlvii. 126) mentions 
among the events in the history of the Religion, ' the killing of 
Zaratiisht himself by Bratro-resh.' See also the note by Darab 
D. P. Sanjana in Geiger's Eastern Iranians, ii. p. 216. Compare 
likewise Dinkart translated by Peshotan Dastur Behramjee 

iQr May 1, B.C. 583, if I reckon the Parsis, i. 149, 150; ii. 154. On 

correctly. On the Zoroastrian months, the year, see "West's calculations in 

see Darmesteter, Le ZA. i. 33-36, and SBE. xlvii. Introd. § 55, given below 

Dosabhai Framji Karaka, History of in Appendix III. 


Sanjana, vol. vii. p. 485: 'Among wicked priests the most 
wicked was Tur-e-Baratrut (i.e. Tiir-i Bratar-vakhsh) of evil 
nature and desirous of destroying Zarthusht's faith.' 

(f) The Great Iranian Bundahishn in a passage cited and 
translated by Darmesteter (ie ZA. ii. 19, cf. also iii. Introd. 
Ixxix.) describes the demon and wizard Malkos, who shall 
appear at the end of a thousand years to bring distress upon 
the earth, as a manifestation of ruin springing ' from the race 
of Tur-i Bratrok-resh who brought about Zaratiisht's death. ' ^ 

(g) The Persian prose treatise Sad-dar, 9. 5 (West, SBE. 
xxiv. 267) includes among the list of sinners who are on a par 
with Ahriman, the same ' Tiir-i Bratar-vakhsh who slew Zara- 
tiisht.' The metrical Sad-dar repeats it also (Hyde, Historia 
Religionis, p. 441). 

(h) The Pahlavi Bahman Yasht, 2. 3 (West, SBE. v. 195) 
alludes to the same tradition, for when Zaratiisht in a vision 
asks immortality of God, Auharmazd declines it, responding 
thus: 'When (i.e. if) I shall make thee immortal, O Zara- 
tiisht the Spitaman ! then Tiir-i Bratar-vakhsh the Karap will 
become immortal, and when Tiir-i Bratar-vakhsh the Karap 
shall become immortal, the resurrection and future existence are 
not possible.' 

The Pahlavi-Parsi tradition is therefore unanimous that 
Zoroaster perished by the hand of Tiir-i Bratar-vakhsh or 
Bratrok-resh, but it gives no specific details. Firdausi must be 
following an Iranian tradition in keeping with this when he 
assigns this event to the time of the Turanian invasion of Iran, 
and ascribes Zoroaster's death to the storming of Balkh and the 
destruction of the temple Niish-Adar. Other Persian writers 
seem to accept the same tradition. The extracts are given. 

(i) Shah Namah, ed. VuUers-Landauer, iii. 1559 graphically 
describes the final scene. I give a version of it, following Mohl 
iv. 363 and VuUers, Fragmente, 103 : ' The army (of Turan) there- 

1 Malkos sej-clhari min toxmah-i Tur-i Bratrok-reS, i oS-i ZaratuSt yahvunt ; 
see Darmesteter. 


upon entered Balkh, and the world became darkened with 
rapine and murder. They advanced toward the Temple of Fire 
(ataskadaK) and to the palace and glorious hall of gold. They 
burned the Zend-Avesta entire and they set fire to the edifice 
and palace alike. There (in the sanctuary) were eighty priests 
whose tongues ceased not to repeat the name of God ; all these 
they slew in the very presence of the Fire and put an end to 
their life of devotion. By the blood of these was extinguished 
the Fire of Zardusht. Who slew this priest I do not know.'^ 
The story is told over again, a few lines farther on, where the 
messenger bears to the absent Vishtasp the awful news of the 
sacking of the city, the death of Lohrasp, 'the king of kings,' 
and the slaying of the Sage or Master (rad^, by which none 
other than Zardusht is meant. The lines run (cf. VuUers- 
Landauer, iii. 1560, and Mohl, trad. iv. 364) : ' They have slain 
Lohrasp, the king of kings, before the city of Balkh ; and our 
days are darkened and full of trouble. For (the Turks) have 
entered the temple Niish-Adar and they have crushed the head 
of the Master (Zardusht) and of all the priests ; and the brill- 
iant Fire has been extinguished by their blood.' 

(j) The prose chronicle Shah Namah Nasr, which Hyde 
terms an abstract of Firdausi made by some Magian,^ states 
similarly with reference to this event: 'They say that when 
Arjasp's army invaded Iran, Lohrasp left the place of divine 
worship as soon as he learned of this, and took to the field of 
battle. He killed a great many, but he himself was slain, 
together with eighty priests (who were in the temple at Balkh 
Bami). The fire was quenched by their blood; and among the 
number of the eighty priests was Zardusht the prophet, who 
also perished in this war.'^ 

(k) The later Persian work Dabistan (beginning of 17th 

1 See variant in Vullers-Landauer, ^ Hyde, Historia Beligionis Vet. 

iii. 1559, and the translation by Vullers, Pers. pp. 319-325 (1 ed.). 
Fragmente, p. 103, and by Mohl, iv. « After the Latin translation of 

363. Hyde, op. cit. p. 325, 


century A.D.), claims that its statement is based upon ancient 
Iranian authority and gives a picturesque description of the 
manner in which the martyred Zoroaster avenged himself upon 
his slayer Turbaraturhash (i.e. Tur-i Bratar-vakhsh) by hurling 
his rosary at his murderer and destroying him. Or as the 
passage reads: 'It is recorded in the books composed by Zar- 
dusht's followers, and also in the ancient histories of Iran, that 
at the period of Arjasp's second^ invasion, King Gushtasp was 
partaking of the hospitality of Zal, in Seistan, and Isfendiar 
was a prisoner in Dazh Gumbadan ; and that Lohrasp, notwith- 
standing the religious austerities he performed through divine 
favor, laid aside the robes of mortality in battle, after which 
the Turks took the city. A Turk named Turbaratur, or 
Turbaraturhash,^ having entered Zardusht's oratory, the prophet 
received martyrdom by his sword. Zardusht, however, having 
thrown at him the rosary {Sliumar Afin or Ydd Afrdz) which 
he held in his hand, there proceeded from it such an effulgent 
splendor that its fire fell on Turbaratur and consumed him.'^ 

(1) Two other late Persian passages imply that Zoroaster's 
end was violent. Both of these are noticed by Hyde, from 
whom they are adopted here.* The first is from the Persian 
historian Majdi (a.d. sixteenth century), who, after mention- 
ing the dreadful invasion of Arjasp and the death of the priests 
in the temple of Balkh, goes on to say: 'He quenched the fire 
of Zardusht with the blood of the Magi; and some one from 
Shiraz then slew Zardusht himself.'^ 

(m) The second of these two passages is an allusion found 
in the Farhang-i Jahangiri, which apparently refers to the day 
of Zoroaster's death as well as to the day on which he first 
undertook his mission to Vishtasp, for the dates resemble those 

1 Notice the -word ' second ' in con- * Hyde, Historia Seligionis Vet. 
nection with the preceding chapter. Pers. pp. 319, 325. On Majdi, cf. Eth6 

2 I.e. Tur-i Bratar-valthsh. in Grundriss d. iran. Philol. ii. .332. 

s Dabistan tr. Shea and Troyer, i. ^ Hyde, op. cit. p. 319 ; de Harlez, 

371-372. Avesta tr. p. xxv. note 7. 


in Pahlavi sources as already described. The sentence reads: 
' On the thirtieth day, Aniran, he entered Iran (or Persia), and 
on the fifteenth day, Deybamihr, he departed in sorrow from 
Iran.' Hyde, p. 325, seems rightly to have interpreted the 
allusion thus, and he should be consulted in connection with 
pp. 40, 128, above. 

Conclusion. — The accounts of Zoroaster's death by light- 
ning or a flame from heaven, as found in Greek and Latin 
patristic literature, seem to be legendary. According to Iran- 
ian tradition his death was violent, and it occurred at the hand 
of a Turanian whose name is preserved to ill-renown. 
Whether his martyrdom took place in the temple when Balkh 
was stormed, as later Iranian writers all state, cannot posi- 
tively be asserted, although such may have been the case. 




'Still did the mighty flame bum on, 
Through chance and change, through good and ill, 
Like its own God's eternal will 
Deep, constant, bright, unquenchable! ' 

— Mooke's Lalla BooJch. 

Inteoductokt Statements ; The Couesb of Events — The First Ten 
Years after Zoroaster's Death — Evidence of Further Spread of 
THE Religion — Death of the First Apostles — Later Disciples and 
Successors — Prophecies and Future Events — Summary 

Introductory Statements ; the Course of Events. — With tlie 
great Prophet dead, with the holy flame of the sacred shrine 
quenched in the blood of the martyred priests, we might have 
supposed for a moment that the Religion must perish too. 
Happily, as we have seen, this was destined not to be the case. 
Fate, circumstances, and merit issued other decrees. We have 
watched the spark of the altar flame kindling anew; the story 
of the glorious victories won in hallowed battles for Ormazd 
has been told; the banner of the Creed waves once more aloft. 
Little more remains to be chronicled beyond briefly tracing 
the course which events took in the years that followed Zoro- 
aster's death. In other words, we are presently to enter the 
realm where actual history goes hand in hand with tradition. 

Tradition according to the Bahman Yasht asserts that 
'Artashir the Kayan, whom they call Vohuman son of Spend- 
dat,' and whom we know as Ardashir Dirazdast, or the ' long- 
handed,' is the one who 'made the Religion current in the 



whole world.' ^ Actual history agrees with this in so far as it 
shows that Artaxerxes Longimanus, or the ' long-handed,' was 
an ardent Zoroastrian ruler. ^ From the pages of history, fur- 
thermore, we learn that by the time of the last Achaemenians, 
at least, Zoroastrianism is practically acknowledged to have 
become the national religion of Iran. History, alas, has also 
to chronicle in its memorial chapters the cruel blow which 
Alexander dealt to the whole Persian empire upon his trium- 
phal march of world-conquest. Tradition again is in harmony 
in recording how the ' evil-destined ' or ' accursed Iskander ' 
brought ruin everywhere by his sword, and how he burned the 
sacred books of the Avesta, the archetype of the bible of Zoro- 
aster, with the treasury of the ancient Persian kings. This 
last tragic event stands out as the darkest day in the history of 
Zoroastrianism until its final overthrow by Islam, when the 
Koran superseded the Avesta and Ormazd gave place to 

But the two centuries or more between the death of Zoro- 
aster and the coming of Alexander are filled by various reli- 
gious events which the patristic literature of Sassanian times 
carefully records and which it is proper here to notice in con- 
nection with the history of Zoroaster's life. It certainly 
seems curious that we have no mention of Cyrus nor of the 
pious Mazda-worshipper Darius, unless we are to understand 
that the events of their reigns are merged in a general way 
into the achievements of Isfendiar. This is one of the prob- 
lems which belong rather to the history of the Religion to dis- 
cuss. For the years themselves that follow Zoroaster's death, 
the Pahlavi texts give enough general events or incidents to 
mark off the periods or epochs in a loose sort of way. The 
first few years at least are certainly worth recording on the 
lines of the tradition, and a glance should be taken at the 

1 Byt. 2. 17, "West, 8BE. t. 198-199. 

2 Yet see Justi's remark in Iran. Namenhuch p. 34, ArtaxSaBrd 8. 


chronological table in Appendix III., which gives some idea of 
the current of events. 

The First Ten Years after Zoroaster's Death. — From tradi- 
tion we know that King Vishtaspa outlived Zoroaster, and it 
is interesting to see from the assertions of tradition how the 
miraculous events which attended the Prophet's life do not 
cease with his death, but wonders and prodigies still continue 
to be witnessed during the reign of the patron king. The 
influence of the veil and glamour of the heavenly personage is 
not yet removed. The first decade after Zoroaster's death was 
certainly eventful for Vishtasp, and we have a fanciful story 
told in Pahlavi of a wonder that came to pass and a sign that 
was manifested, which illustrates that the divine favor has 
descended upon the king and which symbolizes the progress of 
the Religion under the guise of a chariot in its onward course. 

The Dinkart narrates how the soul of the old warrior Srito, 
who had been dead several hundred years, appears again, visits 
the zealous monarch, and presents to him a wonderful chariot. 
The chariot instantly becomes twofold in form, the one being 
spiritual, the other material.^ And, as the Dinkart passage 
continues, 'in the worldly chariot the exalted Kai Vishtasp 
travelled forth unto the village of the Nofcars, in the joyfulness 
of good thoughts; and in the spiritual chariot the soul of Srito 
of the Visraps travelled forth unto the best existence (i.e. 
returned again to heaven).' ^ This allegory of the chariot 
appears to smack somewhat of Buddhism and the Wheel of the 
Law ; and we may also recall a classical tradition which 
implies Vishtasp's acquaintance with the secret lore of the 
Brahmans, and the legendary wisdom and prophetic vision 
which was ascribed to Vishtaspa down to mediaeval times. ^ 

Evidence of Further Spread of the Religion. — The Dinkart 
text declares that ' Vishtasp the king, when he became relieved 

1 Dk. 7. 6. 1-11. " See Kuhn, Fine zoroastrische 

2 Dk. 7. 6. 11, WestjSBE. xlvii. 80. Propheneiimg, in Festgruss an B. von 
Shall we compare Sp^o in Appendix V., Moth, Stuttgart, 1893, p. 217 seq. 


from the war witli Arjasp, sent to tlie chief rulers about the 
acceptance of the religion, and the writings of the Mazda-wor- 
shipping religion, which are studded with all knowledge.' 
The text then goes on to affirm the rapid spread which the 
Faith saw by the end of the few years. The seed of the ReK- 
gion was the blood of its martyrs slain. And so rapid does 
the progress seem to have been that the text claims as one of 
the marvels of history, the fact that at the end of fifty-seven 
years from the first revelation of the Religion, its advent is 
' published in the seven regions ' of the world, as was described 
in the lost Spend Nask of the Avesta.^ All this is supposed 
to have occurred while Vishtasp still lives. As a proof, more- 
over, of the general acceptance of the Creed, the same passage 
adduces the fact of ' the coming of some from other regions to 
Frashoshtar of the Hvobas for enquiry about the religion.' ^ 
Two of the high priests who came on this holy quest from 
abroad are from the southeastern and the southwestern regions. 
Their names are given as Spiti and Erezraspa — names which 
are found in the Avesta.^ And, similarly, the Apostles went 
into many lands to preach the Gospel after the death of Christ. 
Death of the First Apostles. — Frashaoshtra, Zoroaster's 
devoted friend, follower, and relative by marriage, lives for 
a number of years to exemplify the tenets and expound the 
doctrines of the Master who has 'passed away.' He himself is 
summoned, as the Zat-sparam selections tell us,* some fifteen 
years after Zaratusht, ' in the month Artavahishto, in the 
sixty-third year of the Religion.'^ His distinguished brother 
Jamasp, the wfise Jamaspa, grand vizir of the king, and succes- 
sor of Zoroaster in the pontifical office of the realm, outlives 
Frashaoshtra but a year; or, as the selections of Zat-sparam 

1 Dk. 7. 6. 12 ; of. Dk. 8. 14. 10, West's note on Dk. 9. 21. 24, and Dk. 
West, SBE. xlvii. 80 ; xxxvii. 33. 4. 22, in 8BE. xxxvii. 218, 413. 

2 Dk. 7. 6. 12. Recall also what *■ Zsp. 23. 10. 

has already been said in Chap. VII. * b.c. 568, according to traditional 

about the promulgation of the Religion, chronology ; see West, SBE. xlvii. 

" Yt. 13. 121 ; Dk. 7. 6. 12. See Introd. § 55, and below, Appendix III. 


proceed to clironicle, ' in the sixty-fourth year of the Religion 
passed away Jamasp, the same as became the priest of priests 
after Zaratiisht.'^ This sage was indeed a Mobed of Mobeds. 
Then in the seventy-third year he is followed by his son Han- 
gaiiriish, whose name appears also in the Avesta (Yt. 13. 104). ^ 
Still another event is recorded in the eightieth year of the 
Faith; this is the death of the pious Asmok-Khanvato (A v. 
Asmo-hvanvat), as well as that of the wizard Akht, who is 
killed, and his name also appears in the Avesta as elsewhere.^ 

Later Disciples and Successors. — The same Pahlavi text 
from which the quotations have been made, furnishes also the 
names of 'six great upholders of the religion.'* These are 
Zoroaster's two daughters, ' Freno and Srito, with Ahariibo- 
stoto, son of Metyomah' — three names which appear in the 
Avesta and which have been given in Chapter II. Next is 
mentioned Vohunem (Av. Vohu-nemah, Yt. 13. 104), whose 
birth occurred in the fortieth year of the Religion, or seven 
years before Zoroaster's death. But most important is Seno of 
Biist, in the land of Sagastan,^ who is said to have flourished 
for a hundred years and to have left behind him, as the sixth 
prop and support of the Religion, a hundred pupils whose 
teaching fills the century until the coming of Alexander 
brought ruin and desolation upon the Faith. ^ 

The Greeks likewise recognize a long line of apostles and dis- 

1 B.C. 567. See Appendix III. be- from West in his letter translating for 
low. me the 'Wonders of Sagastan.' 

2 Compare Phi. Zsp. 23. 10 with Yt. « e.g. .331 ; see Appendix HI. On 
13. 104. the teacher Seno (Av. Saena), of. Yt. 

3 Phi. Zsp. 23. 10 ; Av. Yt. 13. 96; 1. 13. 97 ; Zsp. 23. 11 ; Dk. 7. 7. 6 ; and 
30 = 23. 37 ; 5. 82 ; of. Yosht-i Fryano consult West, Grundriss d. iran. Fhilol. 
1. 2, and West's note in SBE. xlvii, 166. ii. 118, § 99, Peshotan Dastur Behram- 

* Zsp. 23. 11. jee Sanjana, Dinkart, vol. v. p. 308 

* Biist is described by the'pseudo- (reading Seno iov Ddyun ; cf. Darmes- 
Ibn-Haukal as being on the river Her- teter, Le ZA. ii. 530) ; especially also 
mend (Hilmend) between Ghor and Jivanji Jamshedji Modi, TAe.4nJigTO'«j/ 
the lake (see Ouseley 's Oriental Geog- of the Avesta, p. 12 in Bombay Branch, 
raphy, p. 206). This information is JBAS. art. xvii. June, 1896. 


ciples, or Magian priests, descending from Zoroaster. Dioge- 
nes Laertius (a.d. second and third century) de Vit. Philos. 
Prooem 2, seems to base Hs statement on the older authority of 
Hermodorus (b.c. 250) when he states that 'after Zoroaster 
there were many different Magians in unbroken succession, 
such as Ostanes, Astrampsychus, Gobryas, Pazates, until the 
overthrow of the Persians by Alexander. '^ The Latin writer 
Pliny employs the name of a Magian, Apuscorus, and he desig- 
nates as Osthanes the Magian priest who accompanied Xerxes 
on his great Hellenic expedition and introduced the Magic Art 
into Greece.^ And so the chain runs on, link after link in 
unending sequence; and in spite of the changes and chances of 
transitory fortune, the line of apostolic succession remains 
unbroken to the present, down to its representatives to-day in 
the priesthood that cherishes the sacred flame in the fire-temple 
of Bombay! 

Prophecies and Future Events. — As several times alluded to 
already, the Pahlavi Bahman Yasht describes an apocalyptic 
vision in which Zoroaster is supposed to have beheld, unfolded 
before him, the whole future history of the Religion. The 
four or seven branches of the tree which rises before his eyes, 
symbolize emblematically the gold, silver, steel, and iron, or 
other eras, of the Faith down to the final Millennium, all of 
which is foretokened. These prophecies are not ancient, how- 
ever, but they date rather from the times that came after the 
Mohammedan Conquest, when Zoroastrianism sank before the 
rising power of Islam. Nevertheless, they sweep in rapid 
glance the whole history of the Religion and they summarize 

1 This subject has already heen al- criticon, sive Sonrniorum Interpretation 

luded to in Chap. I., and the text of reoogn. Scaliger, Paris, 1599. 
the passage is given in Appendix V. 2 Cf . Appendix V., and also Kleuker, 

and in Appendix II. The plurals in- Zend-Av. Anhang, li. Thl. 3, p. 91 ; 

dicate type or class. In connection "Windischmann, Zor. Stud., pp. 285, 

■with Astrampsychus, moreover, -we n. 2, 286. Furthermore, on a mention 

may recall the later dream-book which of Osthanes, Hostanes, in Minucius Fe- 

bears his name, Astrampsychi Oneiro- lix, compare Kleuker, torn. cit. p. 119. 


the great eras which the Founder himself in his wise judgment 
and prophetic insight might in a general way have forecast as 
the history of nations and of faiths, even though he did not 
express it. 

Summary. — Zoroastrianism does not die with its founder. 
National events have changed the course of its history, but it 
lives on. The occurrences of the years that intervened between 
the death of the Prophet and the coming of Alexander, so far 
as they are chronicled by tradition, are worth recording as the 
result, in a way, of Zoroaster's life, and they are interesting 
from the standpoint of comparison between tradition and actual 



'Read the conclusion, then.' 

— Shakspeee, Pericles, 1. 1. 56. 

And now the story of the life and legend of the Prophet of 
ancient Iran — the sage who was born to leave his mark upon 
the world, who entered upon his ministry at the age of thirty, 
and who died by violence at the age of seventy-seven — is at 
an end. Hurriedly we maj^ scan once more the pages of his 
career. Born in the fulness of time, he appears as a prophet 
in the latter half of the seventh century before the Christian 
era, and the period of his activity falls between the closing 
years of Median rule and the rising wave of Persian power. 
He himself stands as the oldest type and representative of what 
we may call, in the language of the Bible, the laws of the 
Medes and Persians. His teaching had already taken deep 
root in the soil of Iran when the Jews were carried up into 
captivity in Babylon and had learned of that law which altereth 
not, or before a Daniel came to interpret the ominous hand- 
writing on the wall which the soothsayers failed to read. Zoro- 
aster is the contemporary of Thales, of Solon, or of the Seven 
Sages of classical antiquity. He is the forerunner of Confu- 
cius, the philosopher who was to arise to expound to China the 
tenets of her people's faith. By him is sounded in Iran the 
trumpet-call that afterwards echoes with a varied note in 
India when the gentle Buddha comes forth to preach to thirst- 
ing souls the doctrine of redemption through renunciation. 
Zoroaster, finally, is the father, the holy prototype, of those 



"Wise Men from the East who came and bowed before the 
new-born Light of the World in the manger-cradle at 

Zoroaster was a Magian ; the Magi, as Herodotus tells us, 
were a Median tribe. Although he was born in Atropatene in 
the west, it is not impossible that much of his prophetic career 
was spent in the east, in Bactria or in that region of country. 
We certainly have evidence that the seeds of his teaching 
found fruitful soil in eastern Iran. Crusading achieved the 
rest. The story of the Holy Wars between Iran and Turan, 
the storming of Balkh, the final victories in the great battles 
of Khorassan or Bactria, have all been told. The spread of 
the Creed continues. Media itself doubtless generally accepted 
the reform of the Prophet. The Median name Fravartish has 
been interpreted by Justi to mean ' Confessor ' (i.e. of the Zoro- 
astrian Faith), and has been instanced as a proof of its accept- 
ance, although this appellation seems rather to be an old Magian 
name, agreeing with the concept fravaH, which apparently 
existed before the Zoroastrian reform. The Magians them- 
selves were known long prior to the time of Zoroaster, as Albi- 
runi (p. 314) expressly states; but, as he adds, in the course 
of time there remains ' no pure, unmixed portion of them who 
do not practise the religion of Zoroaster.' This tends to prove 
how universally the doctrines had found acceptance. The 
question as to the time when and the manner in which the 
Faith entered Persia Proper is reserved for discussion else- 

As to the general deductions which have been drawn, we 
may say that time wiU doubtless prove or disprove the accuracy 
or inaccuracy of many of the statements upon which they are 
based. Some of these may be shown to rest upon a foundation 
of fact rather than fiction, especially if we may judge from the 
tendency of recent years in finding confirmation for tradition. 
Some, however, may be proved to be purely fanciful. We can 
but gain by the truth in either case. The historic import of 


some, moreover, may be shown to be not without interest. In 
the light of such, perhaps, the current views with regard to the 
relationship between Zoroastrianism and Judaism may take on 
a new aspect, particularly if we emphasize the fact that Zoro- 
aster arose in the west, in Atropatene and Media, about the 
time of the early Prophetic Period of Israel. From the Bible 
we know that captive Jews were early carried up from Samaria 
into certain cities of the Medes. From the Avesta, on the 
other hand, we know that Zoroaster had rung out a trumpet 
note and clarion cry of reform, of prophecy, and of Messianic 
promise, before the days of Babylonian Exile. 

From our knowledge, too, of contemporaneous history we 
recall in the current of events that the reputed empire of Bac- 
tria, if it existed, had yielded the prestige to Media ; and that 
the sovereignty of Media was swept away before the glorious 
power of Persia. In Persia, Greece recognized a culmination 
of the glory of Iran. Though the Greek vanquishes the Per- 
sian in battle, he still has stories to tell of Magian wisdom and 
of Eastern philosophy. Plato, Pythagoras, and other great 
thinkers are claimed to have emulated the teachings of the 
Magi ; and later Moslem or Zoroastrian tradition asserts that 
the ancient sacred writings of Iran, the quintessence of all 
knowledge, were translated into Greek. 

And as for imperial times, the Persian wars brought Rome 
into contact with Zoroastrians, as they had brought the Greeks. 
A phase of Zoroastrianism known as Mithraism penetrated into 
Rome and into Western Europe. The rise of the Neo-Platonic 
school was certainly not without influence from Zoroastrianism, 
nor without influence upon later Zoroastrianism. The tenets 
of Zoroastrian Manichseism even disturbed Christian thought 
for a time. In all such cases the relations doubtless are more 
or less reciprocal. Even the pages of the Koran and the doc- 
trines of Mohammed are not free from the influence of the 
Faith which they vanquished by the sword. The spark of the 
sacred fire has never been quenched; the holy flame continues to 


blaze; and the Religion of Zoroaster still lives on. Yes, and 
whatever may be the changing fates, it will live on, so long as 
there are successors worthy to bear the name of the Master, as 
are the Parsis to-day, those faithful followers of the Creed of 
the Prophet of Ancient Iran. 

Ehujastah pal va nam-i u ZaraduH. 

— FiKDAUSI, Shah Ndmah. 













The number of etymologies or explanations for Zoroaster's name 
(of. p. 14) is almost legion. In Greek classical antiquity, Deinon 
offered an interpretation or paraphrase, as lie defined the Prophet's 
name as ' Star-worshipper ' {a.<jTpoOvT-q<i) ; see citation in Diogenes 
Laertius, Proaem, 1. 6: Auvmv . . . os koI ixc0epiji,rjvcv6ixev6v <^-q(n 
Tov Zaypoda-rpriv d(TTpo6vTrjv iivai. The Scholiast of the Pla- 
tonic Alcibiades I. p. 122, evidently accepts this derivation vfhen he 

says : Zwpoda-Tpr]^ . . . ov Sc €is EWrjViKTjv tjymvrjv p.era^pat.op.e.vov 

Tovvojxa TOV d<TTpo9vTr]v &/]Xo7. See Appendix V. below. In this 
explanation the first part of the name (Zcop-) seems to be associated 
in some way with the later Persian zor = Av. zaoOra-, ' libation ' ; 
the latter portion of the name is Grsecized as auTrip ; cf . Windisch- 
mann, Zoroastrische Studien, p. 275, and see also Pott, ZDMQ. xiii. 

Somewhat similar appears to be the attempt of the Clementine 
Homilies and Recognitions to interpret as ^olcra par) daripos, or as 
vivum sidus, as given below in Appendix V., Clevi. Homil. 9. 3-6 : 

8ia TO T-fjV TOV dfTTipO's KaT avTOV ^Sxrav ive)(6jjvai, por/v ^ Recogni- 

tiones, 4. 27-29 : quasi vivum astrum. . . . Hinc enim et nomen post 
mortem eius Zoroaster, hoc est vivum sidus. See Appendix V., 
§ 12, and cf. Eapp, ZDMG. xix. 34. 

The next explanations, if we follow chronological sequence, are to 
be found in the Syro-Arabic Lexica of Bar 'All (c. a.d. 832) and of 
Bar Bahlul (c. a.d. 936) as 'golden kingdom' or 'royal gold,' zar, 
' gold ' + wast, ' kingship ' ; cf. Gottheil, References to Zoroaster, 
pp. 27-28. 

Lapse of time has not caused conjectures to cease, and etymologies 
have still continued to be offered. Hovelacque {L'Avesta, Zoroastre 
et le Mazdeisme, p. 135 seq., Paris, 1880) enumerates various sug- 
gestions that have been made, including the Clementine vivum sidus 
given above and recorded by Barnabe Brisson, De Regio Persarum 



Principatu, p. 387, Argentorati, 1710 (orig. ed. Paris, 1590) ; or 
another interpretation as ' friend of fire ' proposed by Henry Lord, 
Religion of the Par sees, p. 162, London, 1630 = p. 332 a, Churchill 
ed. London, 1732; cf. likewise d'Herbelot, BiUiotMque orientcde, art. 
'Zoroastre'; or, again (as stated on Parsi authority), a proposed 
significance, ' bathed in gold,' ' melted silver,' Zaer-sios, Zaersioest, 
found in C. Le Bruyn, Voyages en Perse et aux Indes orientales, 
ii. p. 388. Most of these attempts are futile, as they were made 
without an acquaintance with the actual Avestan form ZaraOuitra. 

The discussion by Anquetil du Perron {Zend-Avesta, i. Part 2, 
p. 2 seq., Paris, 1771) is of interest because he knew Avestan, but 
his conjecture 'Taschter (astre) d'or' — connecting the name with 
Tishtrya — had little to recommend it. Eugene Burnouf was the 
first who rightly saw ustra, ' camel,' in the name and he explained 
ZaraO-ustra as ' f ulvos camelos habens ' {Gomm. sur le Ya^a, pp. 12- 
14, Paris, 1833) ; but he afterwards gave ' astre d'or ' (Notes, p. 166), 
see Brockhaus, Vendidad Sade, p. 361, Leipzig, 1860, and Windisch- 
mann, Zor. Stud. pp. 46-47, or earlier in Jen. Litt. Zt., 1834, nr. 
138, pp. 138-139. In the year 1855, Sir Henry Rawlinson made a 
guess that the name might be Semitic, i.e. ZaraAliustra = Ziru-istar 
' seed of Ishtar, descendant of Venus,' JUAB., Gt. Brit, and Ireland, 
XV. 227, 246 (cf. George Eawlinson, Herodotus, vol. iii. p. 455). 
On the contrary Haug, Die fiXnf OatJias, ii. p. 246, Abh. f. Kunde d. 
Morgenlandes, Leipzig, 1860, suggested ' tref&icher Lobsanger ' (cf . 
Skt. jarat ' praising ' + uttara ' superior ') but he afterwards aban- 
doned such a view. It was criticised also by Weber, Lit. 0. Bl., nr. 
28, p. 467 (1861), nr. 27, p. 647 (1863) = Ind. Streif. pp. 449, 466 
(1869). Also discussed by Mills, Zoroastrian Gathas, p. 426 seq. 
(1892-4). Another scholar (Lassen, I believe, if we may judge from 
Windischmann, Zor. Stud. pp. 46-47 ; Pott, ZDMG. xiii. 426 seq.) 
offered ' gold-smith ' (cf. Skt. hari + tvastar). Jules Oppert made 
Zoroaster 'splendeur d'or' in his L'Honover, le Verbe Criateur de 
Zoroastre, p. 4, Extrait des Ann. de Philos. Ghritienne, Jan., 1862. 

In the same year as Oppert (1862), Pr. Muller summarized a number 
of views that were current at the time and he explained zarad-uitra 
as 'muthige Kamele besitzend' {Zendstudien, i. 635-639, Sitzungsbe- 
richte der Akademie, Dez., 1862, Wien, 1862 = transl. by Darab 
Peshotan Sanjana Geiger's Eastern Iranians, ii. 172 seq.). [But cf. 
Lit. Centralblatt, 1863, p. 614; and later Muller offers the bizarre 
interpretation as zSdra-icSta 'von der Geburt an Gliick habend' 


{WZKM. vi. 264, Wien, 1892). J Spiegel proposed 'Kamele 
peinigend' {Sitzh. kgl. bayer. AJcad. phil. d. p. 10, Jan. 6, 1867). In 
1871, the Spanish scholar Ayuso accepted the more or less familiar 
identification of part of the name with 'star,' as shown by his 
' estrella de oro ' {El Estudio de la Filologia, p. 180, Madrid, 1871) ; 
and he repeats the same view in his Los Pueblos iranios y Zoroastro, 
p. 7, Madrid, 1874. 

Eeturning to France, it may next be noted that J. Darmesteter 
(Ormazd et Ahriman, p. 194, n., Paris, 1877) first proposed * zarat- 
vat-tra, comparative degree of an adj. signifying ' rouge, couleur 
d'or'; but he later suggests 'aux chameaux jaunes' zaraOuriistra, 
Le ZA. iii. Introd. p. 76, n., Paris, 1893 ; but on this see Barthol- 
omae, IF. vi. Anz. p. 47. Ascoli once offered * zarat-vastra ' der 
bebauung des feldes zugewogen, zugethan' Beitrage z. vgl. Spr. v. 
211, 1868. More recently Casartelli hinted at 'ploughing with 
camels' (cf. Skt. halo- 'plough'). Academy, vol. 31, p. 257, April 9, 
1887. Other suggestions have been made such as Paulus Cassel, 
explaining as Hebraic ' Sternensohn ' {Zoroaster, sein Name und seine 
Zeit, Berlin, 1886, cited from Grundriss d. iran. Philol. ii. 40, n.). 
Brunnhofer, Vom Pontus bis zum Indus, p. 147, Leipzig, 1890. 
Kern's 'Goldglanz' {Zara-thuStra) and Brodbeck's 'Gold-stern' (evi- 
dently after Anquetil's etymology, cf. Brodbeck, Zoroaster, p. 30, 
Leipzig, 1893) are noted by Eindtorff, Die Religion des Zarathustra, 
p. 13 (Weimar, 1897). E. Wilhelm has also incidentally dealt with 
the subject of Zoroaster's name in connection with the form 
ZaOpava-TT]';, which is found in Ctesias, in Le Musion, x. 669-571, 
Lou vain, 1891. 



Presented to the American Oriental Society April ISth, 1895. 

[Reprinted from the Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. xvii., 
pp. 1-22, 1896. A few slight additions which have tieen made are indicated by 
enclosing them in square brackets. Some trivial changes made for the sake of 
uniformity, and several unimportant corrections require no notice. ] 

Great men are the cliildreii of their age. Heirs to the heritage 
of the past, they are charged with the stewardship of the posses- 
sions to be handed down to the future. Summing up within 
themselves the influences of the times that call them forth, stamped 
with the impress of their day, their spirit in turn shows its reflex 
upon the age that gives them birth. We read them in their age ; we 
read their age in them. So it is of the prophets and sages, religious 
teachers and interpreters, which have been since the world began. 
The teaching of a prophet is the voice of the age in which he lives ; 
his preaching is the echo of the heart of the people of his day. The 
era of a prophet is therefore not without its historic significance ; it 
is an event that marks an epoch in the life of mankind. The age of 
most of the great religious teachers of antiquity is comparatively 
well known ; but wide diversity prevails with regard to the date at 
which Iran's ancient prophet Zoroaster lived and taught ; yet his 
appearance must have had its national significance in the land 
between the Indus and the Tigris ; and the great religious movement 
which he set on foot must have wrought changes and helped to shape 
the course of events in the early history of Iran. The treatment of 
this question forms the subject of the present paper.^ 

1 This paper forms a companion-piece to the present writer's discussion 
of 'Zoroaster's Native Place' in JAOS. xv. 221-232. 

2 [Since the appearance of the monograph on the 'Date of Zoroaster,' 
which is here reprinted, the general subject of Zoroastrian chronology has 
been ably treated by E. W". West {SBE. xlvii. Introd. p. xxvii. seq.). 
Dr. West's researches confirm the results here obtained ; and he is in a 
position to define the date of Zoroaster still more precisely, at least on the 
basis of tradition, as b.c. 660-583. His entire discussion should be read. 
An extract from his chronological table is given in Appendix III. ] 



The Ayesta itself gives us no direct information in answer to the 
inquiry as to the date of Zoroaster. It presents, indeed, a picture 
of the life and times ; we read accounts of King Vishtaspa, the 
Constantine of the Faith; but the fragments that remain of the 
sacred texts present no absolutely clear allusions to contemporary 
events that might decisively fix the era. The existing diversity of 
opinion with reference to Zoroaster's date is largely due to this fact 
and to certain incongruities in other ancient statements on the 
subject. The allusions of antiquity to this subject may conveni- 
ently be divided into three groups:^ — 

° [The results of earlier investigators of the subject, Brisson, Stanley, 
Hyde, Buddeus, Prideaux, and others, as mentioned by Anquetil du Perron, 
are practically included in his examination of the problem of Zoroaster's 
date. Anquetil's treatise, together with Poucher's previous inquiries into 
the subject, are accessible in Kleuker, Anhang zum ZA. i. Thl. 1, pp. 325- 
374, and Thl. 2, pp. 55-81. They are of interest to the specialist. Cf. also 
Spiegel, Avesta Uebersetzt, i. 43, n. The later bibliography of the subject 
is given below in the course of the investigation.] 

I. First, those references that assign to Zoroaster [= oi'ig- P- 2] 
the extravagant date b.c. 6000. 
II. Second, such allusions as connect his name with the more or 
less legendary Ninus and the uncertain Semiramis. 
III. Third, the traditional date, placing the era of Zoroaster's 
teaching at some time during the sixth century b.c. 

All the material will first be presented under the headings A. I., 
A. II., and A. III. ; then a detailed discussion of the data, pages 
16-19 = pp. 170-174, under the heading B ; and, finally, a sum- 
mary of results, under the heading C, pages 19-22 = pp. 174r-177. 


A I. Classical passages placing Zoroaster at 6000 B.C. 

a. Pliny the Elder. 

b. Plutarch. 

c. Scholion to Plato. 

d. Diogenes Laertius. 

e. Lactantius. 
i. Suidas. 

g. Georgius Synoellua. 


A. II. Passages associating Zoroaster's name with Semiramis and Ninus. 

a. Ctesias. 

b. Cephalion (Moses of Khorene, Georgius Syncellus). 

c. Theou. 

d. Justin. 

e. Amobius. 

f. Eusebius. 

g. Orosius. 
h. Suidas. 

i. Snorra Bdda. 

j. Bar 'All. 

A. III. The native tradition as to Zoroaster's date. 

a. Arta Viraf. 

b. Bundahishn. 

c. Albiruni. 

d. MasMI. 

e. Tabari. 

f. The Dabistan. 

g. rirdausi. 

h. The Mujmal al-TawarIkh and the Ulama-i Islam. 

i. The Chinese-Parsi era. 

j. Reports connecting Zoroaster and Jeremiah. 

k. Pahlavi Perso-Arabic allusions to Nebuchadnezzar. 

1. Ammiamis Marcellinus and Butychius. 

m. Nioolaus Damascenus, Porphyry, etc. 

A. Data foe the Age op Zoroaster. 

A. I. Allusions placing Zoroaster at 6000 B.C. 

The allusions of the first group comprehend those classical 
references that assign to Zoroaster the fabulous age of b.c. 6000 or 
thereabouts.^ These references are confined chiefly to the classics, 

and their chief claim to any consideration is that they 
[= orig. p. 3] purport to be based upon information handed down from 

Eudoxus, Aristotle, and Hermippus. Stich extraordi- 
nary figures, however, are presumably due to the Greeks' having 
misunderstood the statements of the Persians, who place Zoroaster's 
millennium amid a great world-period of 12,000 years, which they 
divided into cycles of 3000 years,^ and in accordance with which 
belief Zoroaster's fravashi had in fact existed several thousands of 
years. The classical material on the subject is here presented. 


1 So the general classical statements of ' 5000 years before the Trojan 
war,' or the like, although some variant readings 500 (for 5000) are found. 
The number 5000 (6000) is, however, the correct one. 

2 According to the chronology of the Bundahishn 34. 7, Zoroaster appeared 
at the end of the ninth millennium : compare, West, Bundahish transl. 
8BE. V. 149-151 notes ; Spiegel, Eranisehe Alterthumskunde, i. 500-508 ; 
Windischmann, Zoroastrische iStudien, 147-165 ; also Plutarch Is. et Os. 47, 
0e(J7ro^7ros Se <p-q(XL Kark rohs fj^dyovs az/ct fx4pos rpiaxi^ta %rri rhv fxev Kpare^f^ 
rhv Sh KpoTcio-floi TtSi' ffeay, &\Aa Se Tpurxl^'a juaxfo'fei Ka\ To\iiieii> Koi avaXieii/ 
Ta rod eTepou t6v erepoi/' t€\os 6' aTToXeiireadai rhv "Ai5t)v. 

(a) Pliny the Elder (a.d. 23-79), N. H. 30. 2. 1 [Wn. 279, 288], 
cites the authority of Eudoxus of Cnidus (b.c. 368), of Aristotle 
(B.C. 350), and of Hermippus (c. b.c. 250), for placing Zoroaster 
6000 years before the death of Plato or 6000 years before the Trojan 
war : Eudoxus, qui inter sapientiae sectas darissimam utilissimamque 
earn (artem magicam) intellegi voluit, Zoroastrem hunc sex milihus 
annorum ante Platonis mortem fuisse prodidit; sic et Aristoteles. Her- 
mippus qui de tota ea arte diligentissime scripsit et viciens centum milia 
versuum a Zoroastre condita indicibus quoque voluminum eius positis 
explanavit, praeceptorem, a quo institutum diceret, credidit Agonacen, 
ipsum vera quinque milihus annorum ante Troianum helium fuisse. 
Eor that reason apparently {N. H. 30. 2. 11) he speaks of Moses as 
living multis milihus annorum post Zoroastrem. But Pliny also ex- 
presses uncertainty as to vrhether there was one or two Zoroasters, 
and he mentions a later Proconnesian Zoroaster : N. H. 30. 2. 1 sine 
duhio illic {ars Magica) orta in Perside a Zoroastre, ut inter auctores 
convenit. iSed unus hie fuerit, an postea et alius, non satis constat; 
and after speaking of Osthanes, the Magian who accompanied Xerxes 
to Greece, he adds : (N. H. 30. 2. 8.) diligentiores paulo ante hunc 
(Osthanem) ponunt Zoroastrem alium Proconnesium. Pliny's Pro- 
connesian Zoroaster must have flourished about the seventh or sixth 
century. [See Appendix V. § 5, belovr.J 

(b) Plutarch (a.d. 1st century), adopts likewise the same general 
statement that places the prophet Zoroaster about 5000 years before 
the Trojan war: Is. et Os. 46 (ed. Parthey, p. 81), Zmpoaa-rpL's (sic) 6 
/xdyoi, ov irevTaKia-^iXloi'; erecn tS)v TpoiLKU)]/ yeyoi/eVat TrpeaftvTipov IcTTOpovcriv. 

[See Appendix V. § 6, below.J 

(c) The Scholion to the Platonic Alcihiades I. 122 (ed. Baiter, 
Orelli et Winckelmann, p. 918), makes a statement, in substance 
tantamount to the last one, as follows : Zuipoda-Tprj^ apxanorepoi 
i$aKLcr)(L\ioL^ erecrti' eivat XiyeraL nXaroivos. [See Appendix V. § l.J 


[= orig. p. 4] (d) Diogenes Laertius (a.d. 2d, 3d century), de Fif. 
Philos. Prooem. 2 (recens. Cobet, Paris, 1850, p. 1), 
similarly quotes Hermodorus (b.c. 250 ?), the follower of Plato, 
as authority for placing Zoroaster's date at 5000 years before the 
fall of Troy, or, as he adds on the authority of Xanthus of Lydia 
(B.C. 500^50), Zoroaster lived 6000 years (some MSS. 600) before 

Xerxes. The text runs : airo Si tS>v Maywv, &v ap^ai Z(j}poa.crTprjv tov 
Hepariv, 'Ep/xdSupos /Jtev 6 IIXaTcoviKos iv T<a Trepl ixa6r]p,a.TU>v cjirjcriv eh ttjv 
TpoM'S aXuKTiv trrj yeyovivai Tr€VTaKicr)(i)^La ' Hdv^os Se 6 AuSos eh rrjv 
'Bepiov Bi,d/3aa-iv diro tov ZoipodcTTpov e$aKi<r)(cX.Ld (j>rj(n, koI fier avTOV 
yeyovevai vroAXovs T6vas Mayous Kara SiaBo)c^v, 'Ocrravas kol 'AcrTpafi\j/v)(ovs 
Koi Via/3pvai Koi Tla^drai, p^expi tijs tuJv TlepaSiv vir 'AXe^dvSpov Kara- 

X-va-ews. [See Appendix V. § 15.] 

(e) Lactantius, Inst. 7. 15, must have entertained some similar 
opinion regarding Zoroaster ; for he speaks of Hystaspes (famous as 
Zoroaster's patron) as being an ancient king of Media long before 
the founding of Rome : Hystaspes quoque, qui fuit Medorum rex 
antiquissimus . . . sublatum iri ex orbe imperium nomenque Roma- 
num multo ante praefatus est, quam ilia Troiana gens conderetur 
(cf. Migne, Patrolog. torn. 6 and Windischmann, Zor. Stud. p. 259, 

(f) Suidas (10th century a.d.), s. v. ZwpodtrTprj^, speaks of two 
Zoroasters, of whom one lived 600 (read 6000) years before the 
Trojan war, while the other was an astronomer of the.time of Ninus 

— iyevero Si Trpo rStv TpuiLK&v erecTLV (f>'. 

(g) Georgius Syncellus, Chronograpliia, i. p. 147, ed. Dindorf, 
alludes to a Zoroaster as one of the Median rulers over Babylon. 
Cf. Windischmann, Zor. Stud. p. 302, and Haug, A Lecture on Zoro- 
aster, p. 23, Bombay, 1865. On Syncellus' citation of Cephalion, 
see next page. 

A. II. Allusions associating Zoroaster's Name with Semiramis 
and Ninus. 

Second to be considered is a series of statements which connect 
the name of Zoroaster with that of the more or less uncertain Ninus 
and Semiramis.^ These references also are confined almost exclu- 
sively to the classics, and the difficulty with them is that, in addi- 
tion to their general character, which bears a legendary coloring, 
they are based apparently upon a misinterpretation of the name 


'O^apTijs or its variants in a fragment of Ctesias (discussed below), 
wMcli has been understood as an allusion to Zoroaster. 

1 The date of Semiramis, however, is regarded by Lehmann (Berliner 
FUlolog. Wochenblatt, Nr. 8, col. 239-240, 17 Febr. 1894, comparing Hdt. 
1. 184) to be about b.c. 800. 

(a) The authority of Ctesias (b.c. 400) is quoted by Diodorus 
Siculus (a.d. 1st century) 2. 6, for the statement that Ninus with 
a large army invaded Bactria and by the aid of Semiramis gained 
a victory over King Oxyartes. See Fragments of the Persika of 
Ktesias, ed. Gilmore, p. 29. Instead of the name 'OfuaprT/s, the 
manuscript variants show "Exaoprrj's, Xaoprrj^, ZaopT?;?. The last 
somewhat recalls the later Persian form of the name Zoroaster ; and 
Cephalion, Justin, Eusebius, and Arnobius, drawing 

on Ctesias, make Zoroaster a Bactrian or the opponent [= orig. p. 5] 
of ISTinus (see below) ; but 'Oivaprrj^ may very well be 
an independent name, identical as far as form goes with Av. 
uxsyat-ardta, Yt. 13. 128, and it is doubtless the better Greek reading. 
The other statements are here given as they similarly come into 
consideration with respect to Zoroaster's native place. They are : — 

(b) Fragments of Cephalion (a.d. 120), preserved in the Arme- 
nian version of Eusebius, Ghron. 1. 43, ed. Aucher : a passage 
describes the defeat of Zoroaster the Magian, king of the Bactrians, 
by Semiramis : " Incipio scribere de quibus et alii commemorarunt 
atque imprimis Hellanicus Lesbius Ctesiasque Gnidius, deinde Herodo- 
tus Halicarnassus} Primum Asiae imperarunt Assyrii, ex quibus 
erat Ninus Beli (Jilius), cuius regni aetate res quam plurimae celeber- 
rimaeque virtutes gestae fuerunt." Postea his adiciens profert etiam 
generationes Semiramidis atque (narrat) de Zoroastri Magi Bactriano- 
rum regis certamine ac debellatione a Semiramide : nee non, tempus 
Nini LII annos fuisse, atque de obitu eius. Post quern quum regnas- 
set Semiramis, Tnuro Babylonem circumdedit ad eandem formam, qua 
a plerisque dictum est: Ctesia nimirum et Zenone Herodotoque nee 
non aliis ipsorum posteris. Deinde etiam apparatum belli Semirami- 
dis adversus Indos eiusdemque diadem et fugam narrat, etc. This 
statement is recorded by Georgius Syncellus (c. a.d. 800), Chron., ed. 
Dind. i. p. 315 : ""'Ap^ofiai ypoL<\>av, &<f> S>v SXKoi re iiJi,vrjiJ.6veva-av, koX to, 
TTputra 'EXXdviKOi re o Accr/Stos Kai ^Trja-ti)? 6 KvtSios, cjreiTa 'HpoSoros 6 
'AXiKapvacrem- to TraXaibv rrji 'Acrtas i/Saa-iXevcrav 'Aa-uvpioi, rmv 8e 6 
"QriXov Ntvos." ctT eKaya yeVccrtv '2,efJi.Lpdfiea>is koI ZuipodarTpov i^dyov (MSS. 


/Saroi)) era v^ rrfi Nt'vov ^axrCKua.%. fx.S'' ov BajSvXSiva, i^ijcrtv, 17 5e/^t/oaju,ts 
iTetxia-€, TpOTTov (is iroXXots XeAcKTai, KT5;(rta, Ziyi/tovi (Milller, Auvwvl), 
'H/DoSoTO) xai Tots /xet' auTOiJS • (TTparu-qv t£ air^s Kara tSv 'IvSSv Kat •^rrav 

K. T. k. Cf. also Windischmann, Zor. Stud. p. 303, Spiegel, ^?-an. 
Alter. 1. 676-677 ; Muller, Frag. Hist. Gr. iii. 627. Furthermore, on 
the reputed -work of the Armenian Moses of Khorene, i. 16, see Gil- 
more, Ktesias Persika, p. 30, n.; Spiegel, Eran. Alter, i. 682 ; Windisch- 
mann, Zor. Stud. pp. 304-305 ; Muller, Frag. Hist. Gr. iii. 627, v. 
328 ; Langlois, Historiens de I'Armhiie, ii. 45-175, Paris, 1867-1869. 
[The Armenian Thomas Arzrouni associates Zoroaster's name with 
Semiramis. See Appendix VI.] 

1 This mention of Herodotus might possiWy he adduced as an argument 
that Herodotus was at least acquainted with the name of Zoroaster. 

(c) Again, Theon (a.d. 130 ?), Progyvmasmata 9, Trepl a-vyKpia-cui?, 
ed. Speugel, Bhet. Groec. ii. p. 115, speaks of "Zoroaster the 
Bactrian " in connection with Semiramis : Ov yap el Top.vpi's KpuTToxv 
IcttI KvpoD t) Kol vol fJLa Ata %i/j.ipajj.L's ZuipodcTTpov tov BaKTptov, ^8rj a-vy)(<i}- 
prjTeov Kal to OrjXv tov appevo? avSp^Lorepov €ivai. Cf. Windischmann, 

Zor. Stud. p. 290, Spiegel Fran. Alterthumsk. i. 677. [See Appen- 
dix V. § 8.] 
[= orig. p. 6] (d) Justin (a.d. 120), in his epitome of Trogus Pom- 
peius' Hist. PJiilippic. 1. 1, distinctly makes Zoroaster 
the opponent of Ninus, and says that he was king of Bactria and 
a Magician ■: postremum helium UK fait cum Zoroastre, rege Bactrian- 
orum, qui primus dicitur artes magicas invenisse et mundi principia 
siderumque motus diligentissime spectasse. [See Appendix V. § 10.] 

(e) Arnobius (a.d. 297), Adversus Gentes, 1. 5, in like manner 
mentions a battle between the Assyrians and the Bactrians under 
the leadership respectively of Ninus and Zoroaster : inter Assyrios 
et Bactrianos, Nino quondam Zoroastreque ductoribus. See Gilmore, 
Ktesias, p. 36. [See Appendix V. § 16.] 

(f) Eusebius (a.d. 300), Chron. 4. 35, ed. Aucher, has a like allu- 
sion : Zoroastres Magus rex Bactrianorum clarus habetur adversum 
quem Ninus dimicavit; and again (Windischmann, p. 290), Praepara- 
tio Evang. 10. 9, 10, ed. Dind. I. p. 560, NiVos, KaO' ov Zuipoao-Tpijs o 
Mayos BaKTptW E/Sao-tAcucrc. [See Appendix V. § 18.] 

(g) Paulus Orosius (5th century a.d.), the Spanish presbyter, of 
whose chronicle we have also King Alfred's Anglo-Saxon version, 
states that Ninus conquered and slew Zoroaster of Bactria, the 


Magician. See Orosius, OldrEnglish Text and Latin Original, ed. by 
Henry Sweet (Early Eng. Text Soc. vol. 79), p. 30-31 : Novissime 
Zoroastrem Bactrianorum regem, eundemque magicae artis repertorem, 
pugna oppressum interfecit. Or, in Anglo-Saxon, and he Ninus Soro- 
astrem Bactriana cyning, se cvilie cerest manna drycrmftas, he hine 
oferwann and ofsloh. 

(h) Suidas in his Lexicon (s. v. Zoroaster) assumes the existence 
of two Zoroasters (cf. p. 4 = p. 164), the second an astrologer : 'Aarpo- 

voft.O'i i-rrl NtVov /SacriXeu)? 'A<ro-vpLiav. [Appendix V. § 45.] 

(i) In the Snorra Edda Preface, Zoroaster is identified with Baal 
or Bel, cf. Jackson in PAOS., March, 1894, vol. xvi. p. cxxvi. [See 
Appendix VI.] 

(j) In some Syriac writers and elsewhere an identification of 
Zoroaster with Balaam is recorded, for example in the Lexicon of 
Bar 'All (c. a.d. 832), s. v. Balaam, 'Balaam is Zardosht, the di- 
viner of the Magians.' See Gottheil, References to Zoroaster in 
Syriac and Arabic Lit. pp. 27, 30 n., 32 (Drisler Classical Studies, 
N. Y., 1894). Sometimes he is only compared with Balaam. [An 
association of his name with Ham, Seth, and Abraham, is also found.] 

A. III. The Native Tradition as to Zoroaster's Date. 

Third, the direct Persian tradition comes finally into considerar 
tion. This tradition is found in the chronological chapter of the 
Bundahishn, 34. 1-9, is supported by the Arta Viraf, 1. 2-5 [and 
Zat-sparam, 23. 12], and is corroborated by abundant Arabic allu- 
sions (Alblrtini, Masudi, et al.). It unanimously places the opening 
of Zoroaster's ministry at 258 years before the era of Alexander, or 
272 years before the close of the world-conqueror's dominion. 
According to these figures, the date of Zoroaster would fall between 
the latter half of the seventh century b.c. and the middle of the 
sixth century ; his appearance in fact would be placed 
in the period just preceding the rise of the Achae- [= orig. p. 7] 
menian dynasty. This merits attention also in detail. 

(a) The Arta Viraf 1. 1-5 in round numbers places Zoroaster 
three hundred years before Alexander's invasion. Compare Haug 
and West, Arda Viraf, p. 141. 'The pious Zaratusht made the reli- 
gion which he had received, current in the world, and till the end of 
300 years the religion was in purity and men were without doubts. 
But afterwards the accursed Evil Spirit, the wicked one, in order to 
make men doubtful of this religion, instigated the accursed Alexan- 


der, the Euman, wlio was- dwelling in Egypt, so that he came to the 
country of Iran with severe cruelty and war and devastation; he 
also slew the ruler of Iran, and destroyed the metropolis and empire.' 
[The Zat-sparam 23. 12 likewise alludes to the fact that the religion 
remained undisturbed ' until the 300th year ']. 

( b) The Bundahishn chapter (ch. 34) ' on the reckoning of the 
years' (to which one MS. adds — ' of the Arabs ') more exactly com- 
putes the various millenniums that made up the 12,000 years of the 
great world-cycle recognized by the worshippers of Mazda. In this 
period the era of Zoroaster falls at the close of the first 9000 years. 
He is placed in reality at the beginning of the historic period, if the 
long reigns attributed to Kai-Vishtasp and to Vohuman son of 
Spend-dat (Av. Spento-data, IST. P. Isfendiar), may with reasonably 
fair justice be explained as that of a ruling house. There seems at 
least no distinct ground against such assumption. [West also 
explains the fabulous length of 120 years for Vishtasp's reign, or b.c. 
660-540, as representing a short dynasty — SBE. xlvii. Introd. 
§ 70]. The Bundahishn passage, 34. 7-8, in West's translation {SBE. 
V. 150-151) reads, (7) ' Kai-Vishtasp, till the coming of the religion, 
thirty years, altogether a hundred and twenty years. (8) Vohu- 
man, son of Spend-dat, a hundred and twelve years ; Humai, who 
was daughter of Vohuman, thirty years ; Daral, son of Cihar-azad, 
that is, of the daughter of Vohuman, twelve years ; Darai, son of 
Darai, fourteen years ; Alexander the Euman, fourteen years.' 

Vishtasp, after coming of religion 90 

Vohiiman Spend-dat 112 

Humai 30 

Daral-i Clhar-azat 12 

Darai-i Darai 14 

Alexander Riiman 14 


The result therefore gives 272 years from 'the coming of the 
religion ' until the close of the dominion of Alexander the Great, or 
258 years before the beginning of his power. A repeated tradition 
exists that Zoroaster was forty-two years old when he first converted 
King Vishtaspa, who became his patron. If we interpret 'the 
coming of the religion ' to mean its acceptance by Vishtaspa, we 
must add 42 years to the number 258 before Alexander in order to 
obtain the traditional date of Zoroaster's birth. This would answer 



to the 'three hundred years before Alexander' of the Arta Viraf. 
If, however, we take the phrase 'coming of the religion' 
to mean the date of Zoroaster's entry upon his ministry [= orig. p. 8] 
(as does West, SBE. v. 219), we must then add 30 
years, which was Zoroaster's age when he beheld his first vision of 
Ormazd. [The latter view is the correct one as shown by West. It 
is worth remarking that as Zoroaster's revelation and the 'coming 
of the religion ' are placed in the thirtieth year of Vishtasp's reign 
as well as of the Prophet's life, both men accordingly would be 
represented as born in the same year if we adopt an Oriental custom 
in dating a king's accession to the throne from the day of his birth.] 
A calculation based upon the figures of this tradition would place 
Zoroaster's birth 42 years + 258 years (= 300 years) before B.C. 330, 
the date of the fall of the Iranian kingdom through Alexander's 
conquest ; in other words it would assign Zoroaster's birth to about 
B.C. 630. [But as West has shown {SBE. xlvii. §§ 63-54), there is 
an evident omission of 36 years in the reckoning ; he accounts for 
this error and combines the items, 272 years of Bd. 34. 7-8 with this 
date of Alexander's death, b.c. 323, and with the 30th year of 
Zoroaster's life in which the Eevelation came, and he finds b.c. 660 
as the traditional date of the birth of Zoroaster and of Vishtasp's 
accession. See below. Appendix III.] According to the same tradi- 
tion the duration of the various reigns of the Kayanian dynasty 
would be about as follows [West's corrected chronology now 
included] : — 

Eeigned Fictitious [West's correction, 
King. years. date b.o. including 85 years.] 

Vishtasp 120 618-498 660-540 

Vohuman (Ardashlr Dirazdast) . 112 498-386 540-428 

Humal 30 386-356 428-363 

Daral 12 356-844 363-351 

Darai-IDarai 14 344-330 351-337 

[Accession of Alexander to his invasion 337-331] 

The results would be somewhat altered if the computation be made 
according to lunar years or if a different point of departure be taken. 
The excessive lengths of the reigns of Vishtasp and Vohuman seem 
suspicious and suggest round numbers unless we are to interpret 
them as comprising successive rulers ; for example, in historic times, 
beside Hystaspes, the father of Darius, we have the names of two 
other Hystaspes, later connected with the ruling house of Bactria.^ 


The historic reigns of the Achaemenians may be compared (cf. 
Stokvis, Manuel d'Histoire, p. 107). 

Cyrus B.C. 558-529 

Cambyses 529-521 

Darius 1 521-485 

Xerxes 485-465 

Artaxerxes Longimanus 465-425 

Darius Nothos 425-405 

Artaxerxes Mnemon 405-362 

Artaxerxes Ochus 362-340 

[Arses] 340-337 

Darius Codomannus 337-330 

Comparison may be made, as with West/ identifying the long reign 
of Vohiiman who is called Ardashir (Artaxerxes or Ardashir 
Dirazdast 'the long-handed') with Artaxerxes Longimanus and his 
successors. Historical grounds throughout seem to favor this. For 
Humai, West suggests Parysatis as a possibility. The last two 
Darais answer to Ochus and Codomannus, and the reign of Kai- 
Vishtasp ' seems intended to cover the period from Cyrns to Xerxes ' 
(West).^ There seems every reason to identify Vohiiman Ardashir 
Dirazdast with Artaxerxes Longimanus, according to the Bahman 
Yasht (Byt. 2. 17), as this Kayanian king 'makes the religion 
current in the whole world.' * One might be possibly tempted to 
regard the Vishtasp reign as representing the Bactrian rule until 
Artaxerxes, and assume that Zoroastrianism then became the faith 

of Persis.* This might account for the silence as to 
[= orig. p. 9] the early Achaemenians and shed some light on the 

problem concerning the Achaemenians as Zoroastrians ; 
but there seems to be no historic foundation for such assumption. 
Suffice here to have presented the tradition in regard to the reigns 
of the Kayanian kings as bearing on Zoroaster's date and the tradi- 
tional 258 years before Alexander as the era of ' the coming of the 

1 See genealogical tables of the Achaemenidae in Stokvis, Manuel d^His- 
toire, de Qenealogie, et de Ohronologie, p. 108 (Leide, 1888) ; Pauly, Seal- 
Encyclopcedie, article ' Achaemenidae ' ; Justi, Gfeschichte des alten Persiens, 
p. 15 ; Iranisches Nameribuch, p. 398-399 ; and Smith, Classical Dictionary, 
article 'Hystaspes.' 

2 West, Bundahish translated, SBE. v. 150 n., 198 n. 

" De Harlez, Avesta traduit, Introduction p. ccxxviii, thinks that the early 
Achaemenians were intentionally sacrificed. Spiegel, ZDMG. xlv. 203, 


identifies the first Darai witli Darius I., and believes that lie was misplaced 
in the kingly list. This I doubt. 

* West, Bijt. transl, 8BE. v. 199. [See also above, pp. 81-82. Consult 
J. H. Moultonin The Thinker, ii. 498-501.] 

* Dubeux, La Ferse, p. 57, sharply separates the Oriental account of the 
Persian kings from the historical account. 

(c) The sum of 258 years is given also by so careful an inves- 
tigator as Albirtini (a.d. 973-1048). His statements are based on 
the authority of 'the scholars of the Persians, the Herbadhs and 
iMaubadhs of the Zoroastrians.' ^ In his Chronology of Ancient Nations, 
p. 17, 1. 17 (transl. Sachau), is found a statement of the Persian view 
in regard to Zoroaster's date: 'from his (i.e. Zoroaster's) appearance 
till the beginning of the JSra Alexandri,^ they count 258 years.' 
Several times he gives the received tradition that Zoroaster appeared 
in the 30th year of the reign of Vishtasp. In another place, Chron. 
p. 196 (transl. Sachau), he gives further information in regard to 
Zoroaster's time : ' On the 1st Eamadan a.h. 319 came forward Ibn 
'Abl-Zakarriya. ... If, now, this be the time (i.e. a.h. 319 = a.d. 
931) which Jam asp and Zaradusht meant, they are right as far as 
chronology is concerned. Por this happened at the end of the ^ra 
Alexandri 1242, i.e. 1500 years after Zaradusht.' Prom this state- 
ment we may compute back to the year b.c. 569 as a date when a 
prophecy is supposed to have been made by Zoroaster and Jamasp. 
AlblrQnl is not exhausted yet. In Chron. 121 (transl. Sachau), he 
says, 'we find the interval between Zoroaster and Yazdajird ben 
Shapur to be nearly 970 years.' This gives the date about b.c. 571 
if we count Yazdajird's reign as a.d. 399-420. Furthermore the 
carefully constructed tables which Albiruni gives from various sources 
are interesting and instructive, owing to their exact agreement with 
the reigns of the Kayanian kings as recorded in the Bundahishn. 
Thus, Chron. p. 112, 107-114 (transl. Sachau) : — 

Kai Vishtasp till the appearance of Zoroaster 30 

The same after that event 90 

Kai Ardashir Bahman (Vohaman) 112 

Khumani (Humai) 30 

Dara 12 

Dara ben Dara 14 

On p. 115 he contrasts these dates with those given by [= o"g. p. lo] 

early occidental authorities. Pinally, Chron. p. 32 

(transl. Sachau), the name of Thales is brought into connection with 


Zoroaster, cf. p. 169, n. 3 below. So much for the information fur- 
nished by Albiruni. 

1 Albiruni, Chronology of Ancient Nations, transl. and ed. by Sachau, p. 109. 

2 According to Albiruni, p. 32 (transl. Sachau) the Mra, Alexandri would 
date from the time when Alexander left Greece at the age of twenty-six 
years, preparing to fight with Darius. 

(d) Of somewhat earlier date but identical in purport is the state- 
ment found in Masudi's Meadows of Gold, written in a.d. 943-944 (Mar 
sUdi died a.d. 957). Like the Bundahishu and like Albiruni, MasMi 
reports that ' the Magians count a period of two hundred and fifty- 
eight (258) years between their prophet Zoroaster and Alexander.' ' 
He reiterates this assertion in Indicatio et Admonitio' by saying 
'between Zoroaster and Alexander there are about three hundred 
years.' Nearly the same, but not exactly identical figures, are found 
as in the Biindahishn, regarding the length of the reigns of the various 
Kayanian kings ; Zoroaster is stated, as elsewhere, to have appeared 
in the thirtieth (30) year of Vishtasp's reign and he dies at the age 
of seventy-seven (77) after having taught for thirty-five (35) years.' 
The statement that Zoroaster lived to the age of 77 years is also 
found elsewhere.^ What Masudi has to say on the subject of Nebu- 
chadnezzar's being a lieutenant of Lohrasp (Aurvat-aspa) and regard- 
ing Cyrus as contemporary with Bahman will be mentioned below, 
as a similar statement occurs in the Dinkart (Bk. 5). [West, SBE. 
xlvii. 120.] 

1 Masudi (Majoudi), Les Prairies dfOr, Texte et traduction par Barbier 
de Meynard, iv. 107 'Les Mages comptent entre leur prophfete Zoroastre, 
fils d'Espiman, et Alexandre, une p^riode de deux cent olnquante-huit ans. 
Entre Alexandre, qu'ils font r^gner six ans, et I'av^nement d'Ard^chir, cinq 
cent dix-sept ans ; enfin entre Ard^chir et I'h^gire cinq cent soixante-quatre 
ans . . . du rfegne d' Alexandre k la nalssance du Messie, trois cent soixante- 
neuf ans; de la naissance du Messie S. celle du Prophfete cinq cent vingt 
et un ans.' Observe especially that MasMi in Indicatio et Admonitio, 
(p. 327-328) accounts for the intentional shortening of the period between 
Alexander and Ardashlr. What he has to say on this subject is worth 
looking up in connection with SBE. v. 151 n. 

2 Masiidi, Le Livre de Vindication et de V Admonition (in Prairies d'Or, 
ix. p. 327), 'Zoroastre fils de Poroschasp fils d'Asinman, dans I'Avesta, qui 
est le livre qui lui a ^t6 rfiv^l^, annonce que, dans trois cents ans, I'empire 
des Perses fiprouvera une grands revolution, sans que la religion soit dtouite ; 
mais qu'au bout de mille ans, I'empire et la religion p&iront en mSme 
temps. Or entre Zoroastre et Alexandre il y a environ trois cents ans ; car 


Zoroastre a para du temps de Caibistasp, fils de Cailolirasp, comme nous 
I'avons dit ci-devant.' See MasudI, Kitab al-Tanhih, p. 90 seq., ed. de 
Goeje, Leyden, 1894. Compare also Gottheil, References to Zoroaster, p. 35 
(in Drisler Classical Studies, New York, 1894) ; [and Le Livre de VAvertisse- 
ment, traduction par B. C. de Vaux (Sooi6t6 Asiatique), p. 140, Paris, 1896]. 

5 MasQdl, Prairies d' Or, ii. p. 123, ed. Barbier de Meynard. ' Youstasf 
(Gustasp) r^gna aprfes son pfere (Lohrasp) et r^sida k Balkh. II 6tait sur le 
tr6ne depuis trente ans, lorsque Zeradecht, fils d'Espiman 
se prgsenta devant lui ... (p. 127). Youstasf r^gna cent [=orig. p. 11] 
vlngt ans avant d'adopter la religion des Mages, puis il 
mourut. La predication de Zeradecht dura trente-cinq ans, et 11 mourut 
&g6 de soixante et dix-sept ans.' The detailed reigns (Masiidi, op. cit. ii. 
126-129) are Vishtasp 120 years, Bahman 112, Humal 30 (or more), Dara 
12, Dara son of Dara 80, Alexander 6 (cf . vol. iv. p. 107 ' Alexandre, qu'ils 
font r^gner six ans'). The latter would answer pretty nearly to the com- 
monly received years of Alexander in Persia, b.c. 330-323. Observe that 
the years of the last three reigns vary somewhat from the Bflndahishn. 
Deducting from Vishtasp's reign the 30 years till Zoroaster appeared and 
counting simply to the coming of Alexander, the resulting 274 years would 
place Zoroaster's appearance at b.c. 604 or, if 42 years old at the time, his 
birth at b.c. 646. [See now West's correction which gives b.c. 660.] But 
notice that instead of 274 years as here, MasMi elsewhere says (^Prairies 
d^Or, iv. 106, quoted above) there were 258 years between Zoroaster and 

* E.g. Dinkart Bk. 7. 5. 1 (communication from "West) and in the Rivayats. 

(e) The period at -whicli the Arabic chronicler Tabarl (died a.d. 
923) ^ places Zoroaster in his record of Persian reigns, is practically 
identical vs^ith the preceding in its results, although he occasionally 
differs in the length of the individual reigns, e.g. Bahman 80 years 
(although he mentions that others say 112 years), Humai about 20 
years, Dara 23 years. He tells also of a tradition that makes of 
Zoroaster one of the disciples of Jeremiah. The latter, according 
to the generally accepted view, began to prophesy about b.c. 626. 
These points will be spoken of again below. 

I See Zotenberg, Chronique de Tabari, traduite sur la version persane 
d'Abou-AU Mo'hammed Bel' ami, tome i. 491-508, Paris, 1867. 

(f) The Dabistan (translated by Shea and Troyer, i. 306-309) nar- 
rates that the holy cypress which Zoroaster had planted at Kishmar 
in Khorassan [I formerly wrongly read Kashmir] and which was 
cut down by the order of Mutawakkal, tenth khalif of the Abbas- 
sides (reigned a.d. 846-860), had stood 'fourteen hundred and fifty 
years (1450) from the time of its being planted, to the year 232 of 


the Hejirali (a.d. 846).' If these years be reckoned as solar years, 
according to the custom of the ancient Persians, and counted from 
the beginning of Mutawakkal's reign, the date of the planting of 
the cypress would be b.c. 604 ; but if reckoned according to the 
lunar calendar of the Mohammedans (i.e. equivalent to 1408 solar 
years), the epoch would be b.c. 562.^ The former date (b.c 604) 
recalls the reckoning of Mastidi alluded to above, on p. 10 [= p. 162]. 
The event of the planting must have been an occasion of special 
moment ; from a reference to the same in rirdausi (translation by 
Mohl, iv. 291-293, Paris, 1877), the conversion of Vishtaspa is per- 
haps alluded to. If the conversion of Vishtaspa really be alluded 
to, 42 years must be added to give the approximate date of Zoro- 
aster's birth. Perhaps, however, some other event in the prophet's 
life is commemorated.^ In any case the results lead us to the latter 
part of the seventh century b.c. and the first part of the sixth century. 
[See now above, p. 80.] 

1 See the calculation [of Anquetil du Perron, in Kleuker, Anli. zum ZA. 

i. Thl. 1. pp. 346-347, and] of Shea and Troyer, Dabistdn, 
[= orig. p. 12] translated, i. 308, n. , Paris, 1843 and Mirkhond's History of 

the Marly Kings of Persia, transl. Shea, p. 281-282, London, 
1832. According to E. Roth, ' Zoroastrische Glaubenslehre ' in Geschichte 
unserer abencllandischen Philosophie, i. 850, the era of the cypress is b.c. 
560. This is adopted by Floigl, Cyrus und Herodot, p. 15, 18 (Leipzig, 
1881). [On Kislimar consult also VuUers, Fragmente, p. 113]. 

2 In case the 1450 years be reckoned back from the date of Mutawakkal's 
death (a.d. 860) instead of from the beginning of his power, the numbers 
would be respectively b.c. 590 (if solar), or b.c. 548 (if lunar). 

(g) The figures of the chapter-headings in the Shah Namah of Pir- 
dausl (a.d. 940-1020) likewise place the opening of Vishtaspa's 
reign at about three hundred years before Alexander's death.-' 

1 Firdusii Schahname, ed. Vullers-Landauer, iii. p. 1495 seq. See also 
Shea and Troyer's Dabistdn, Introd. i. p. Ixxxvi and p. 380. Consult the 
chapter-headings of the reigns in Mohl's translation of Pirdausi, vols, iv.-v. 
Observe that Bahman is assigned only 99 years instead of the usual 112 ; 
the duration of Vishtaspa's reign is given in Mohl, vol. iv. 587, ' cent vingt 
ans ' in harmony with the usual tradition. 

(h) The Persian historical work, Mujmal al-Tawarikh (a.h. 520 
= A.D. 1126),^ following the authority of the Chronicle of the Kings 
of Persia, brought from Farsistan by Bahram, son of Merdanshah, 


Mobed of Shapur, enumerates 258 years before Alexander.^ The 
Ulama-I Islam counts three hundred.' 

1 See Extraits du Modjmel al-Tewarikh, relatifs a Vhistoire de la Perse, 
traduits du persan, par Jules Mohl (Journal Asiatique, tome xi. pp. 136, 
258, 320, Paris, 1841). 

2 Cf. op. clt. p. 230. The author acknowledges indebtedness also to 
Hamzah of Isfahan, Taharl, and Krdausl. His chronology may he deduced 
from pp. 330-339 of the work cited ; it runs, Lohrasp 120 years, Gushtasp 
120 years, Bahman 112, Humai 30, Darab 12 [or 14], Dara son of Darab 14 
[or 16], Alexander 14 [or 28]. Observe the alternative figures in the case 
of the last three numbers. 

According to Eoth, Geschichte unserer abendlandischeii Fhilosophie, i. 
351, the author of the Mujmal al-Tawarikh places Zoroaster 1700 years 
before his own time ; on this ground Eoth places the death of Zoroaster at 
B.C. 522, and is followed by Floigl, Cyrus und Berodot, p. 18. Cf. Kleuker's 
Zend-Avesta, Anh. Bd. i. Theil 1, p. 347. 

8 See VuUers, Fragmcnte iiber Zoroaster, p. 58. 

(i) Interesting is the fact noticed by Anquetil du Perron/ that a 
certain religious sect that immigrated into China a.d. 600 is eyi- 
dently of Zoroastrian origin and that these believers have an era 
which dates approximately from b.c. 659 ; this date Anquetil 
regards as referring to the time when Zoroaster left his home and 
entered upon his mission — a sort of Iranian Hejirah. 

^ See Anquetil du Perron quoted by Kleuker, Anhang zum Zend-Avesta, 
Bd. i. Thl. 1, pp. 349-351 ; cited also by Shea, Mirkliond's History, p. 282, 
and by Roth in Geschichte abendldnd. Fhilosophie, i. 353 and note 566, and 
followed by Floigl, Cyrus und Herodot, p. 18. 

(j) Similar in effect as far as concerns the period at which they 
place the prophet, although of doubtful value or other- 
wise to be explained, are those Syriac and Arabic [= orig. p. 13] 
reports which connect the name of Zoroaster with Jer- 
emiah and which make him the latter's pupil or even identify him 
with Baruch the scribe of Jeremiah.^ Presumably this association 
is due to confusing the Arabic form of the name Jeremiah Armiali 
with Zoroaster's supposed native place Urmiah (Urumiyah).' 

1 (a) The Syro-Arabic Lexicon of Bar Bahlul (about a.d. 963) s.v. 
Kasoma (divinator) : ' Divinator, like Zardosht, who people say is Baruch 
the Scribe ; and because the gift of prophecy was not accorded to him he 
went astray, journeyed to [other] nations and learned twelve tongues.' Cf. 
Payne-Smith, Thesaurus Syriacus, col. 3704. 


(;8) Also Bishop 'Ishodad of Hadatha (about a.d. 852), commentary on 
Matth. ii. 1, ' Some say that he (Zoroaster) is the same as Baruch the pupil 
of Eramya (Jeremiah), and that "because the gift of prophecy was denied 
him as [had been] his wish, and because of that bitter exile and the sack 
of Jerusalem and the Temple, he became offended (or angry) and went 
away among other nations, learned twelve languages, and in them wrote 
that vomit of Satan, i.e. the book which is called Abhasta.' Cf. Gottheil, 
Meferences to Zoroaster, p. 29. 

(7) Identically, Solomon of Hilat (born about a.d. 1222), BooJc of the 
Bee, ' this Zaradosht is Baruch the scribe,' p. 81 seq., ed. Budge (Anecdota 
Oxoniensia), also E. Kuhn, Uine zoroastrische Propheseiung in christlichem 
Gewande (Festgruss an E. von Roth, Stuttgart, 1893, p. 219). Consult 
especially Gottheil, Meferences to Zoroaster (Drisler Classical Studies, New 
York, 1894). 

(S) Tabarl (died a.d. 923) likewise notices the association of Zoroaster 
with Jeremiah. According to him ' Zoroaster was of Palestinian origin, a 
servant to one of the disciples of Jeremiah the prophet, with whom he was 
a favorite. But he proved treacherous and false to him. Wherefore God 
cursed him, and he became leprous. He wandered to Adarbaijan, and 
preached there the Magian religion. From there he went to Bishtasp 
(Vishtaspa), who was in Balkh. Now when he (Zoroaster) had come 
before him, and preached his doctrine to him, it caused him to marvel, and 
he compelled his people to accept it, and put many people to death on its 
account. Then they followed it (the religion) . Bishtasp reigned one hun- 
dred and twelve (112) years.' Gottheil, References to Zoroaster, p. 37. 
See also Ghronique de Tabari traduite par H. Zotenberg, i. p. 499. [In 
the story of the leprosy can there be some reminiscence of Elisha's servant 
Gehazi, who was cursed with leprosy for falsehood after the cleansing of 
Naaman ? See II. Kings, v. 1-27 and compare sara'ath, p. 30 above, and 
Hyde, p. 314.] 

(e) The same general statements of Tabari are repeated by Ibn al-Athir 
(13th century) in his KUdb al-Kdmil fl al-ta'arlkh. See Gottheil, Refer- 
ences to Zoroaster, p. 39. 

(f) Once the Syrian Gregorius Bar 'Ebhraya Abulfaraj (c. a.d. 1250) 
calls Zoroaster a disciple of Elijah (mistake for Jeremiah ?) , see Gottheil, 
References to Zoroaster, p. 32. 

(r;) Similarly the Arab historian Abu Mohammed Mustapha calls Zoroaster 
a disciple of Ezir (Ezra), see Hyde, Hist. Relig. veterum Persarum, p. 313. 

2 So suggested by de Sacy, Notices et Extraits Ses Manuscrits de la Bibl. 
du Roi, ii. 319, see Gottheil, References to Zoroaster (Drisler Classical 
Studies, p. 30 n.). [Anquetil du Perron's view was, that this is owing to 
an unwillingness to attribute to the Persians a prophet of their own, with- 
out Semitic Influence ; see his paragraph in Kleuker, Anh. zum ZA. i. Tbl. 
1, p. 341. This is no doubt also true. See likewise p. 30 above.] 

(k) Pointing to a similar era are the PaLlavi (Dinkart Bk. 5. and 
Mkli.) and Perso-Arabic allusions to Nebuchadnezzar as lieutenant 


of Vishtasp's predecessor, Lohrasp, and of VisMasp himself as well 
as of his successor Bahman (Vohuman). [See also above, p. 91, n. 2.] 
In the same connection Cyrus's name is joined with Vishtasp and 

1 (a) According to Tal)arl( 10th century A.D.) andMasudI, [=orig. p. 14] 
Nebuchadnezzar was lieutenant successively under Lohrasp, 
Vishtaspj and Bahman ; the tradition regarding Lohrasp's taking of Jerusa^ 
lem Is found in the Pahlavi Dinkart Bk. 5 and MalnOg-i Khirat 27. 66-67, 
transl. West, 8BE. xxiv. 65. Taharl (or rather the Persian version of the 
latter by Bel'ami) gives two different versions of the story (see Chronique 
. de Tabarl, traduite sur la version persane de Bel'ami par H. Zotenderg, 
vol. i. pp. 491-507, Paris, 1867), and (Tabari op. oit. p. 503) the return of 
the Jews to Jerusalem is placed in the 70th year of Bahman. Signs of con- 
fusion are evident. So also in Mirkhond (15th century a.d.) who in his 
history repeats Tabari's statement with reference to Nebuchadnezzar and 
liOhrasp, and makes Cyrus a son of Lohrasp although he is placed in the 
reign of Bahman. He regards Bahman (Vohilman) as a contemporary of 
Hippocrates (e.g. 460-357) and Zenocrates (b.c. 396-314) which would har- 
monize properly with the traditional dates above given (pp. 8-9 = pp. 159- 
160) forBahman's reign. See Shea, Mirkhond' s History, pp, 264, 291, 843). 
(;8) MasMi is worth consulting on the same point, especially in respect 
to certain presumed relations between the Persians and the Jews. See 
Barbier de Meynard, Maqoudi Les Frairies d' Or, ii. 119-128. 

(1) At this point may be mentioned two other allusions that place 
Zoroaster's activity in the sixth century before the Christian era, 
although the former of these rests upon the identification of the 
prophet's patron Vishtaspa with Hystaspes the father of Darius. 
The first of these allusions, that given by Ammianus Marcellinus 
(6th century a.d.),^ directly calls Vishtaspa (Hystaspes) the father 
of Darius, although Agathias (6th century a.d./ expresses uncertainty 
on this point. The second allusion is found in Eutychius, the 
Alexandrine Patriarch, who makes Zoroaster a contemporary of 
Cambyses and the Magian Smerdis,^ a view which is shared by the 
Syrian Gregorius Bar "Ebhraya Abulfaraj (c. a.d. 1260)^ [and by the 
Arab chronologist al-Makln^]. 

1 Ammian. Marcell. 23. 6. 32, Magiam opinionum insignium auctor amplis- 
simus Flato, Machagistiam esse verbo mystico docet, divinorum incorruptissi- 
mum cultum, cuius scientiae saeculis priscis multa ex Chaldaeorum arcanis 
Baetrianus addidit Zoroastres, deinde Hystaspes rex prudentissimus, Darii 
pater. The general opinion is that ' saeculis priscis ' is allowable in consid- 
eration of the thousand years that separated Zoroaster and Ammianus, 


and assuming that Ammianus understood Zoroaster and Hystaspes to be 
contemporaries, of. KIeuker,^nfta«g zum Zend-Avesta, Bd. i. Thl. 1, p. 334. 

2 AgathiaS 2, 24, Zapodffrpov Tov ^Op^dtrdews . . . qutos 5e d ZotpodSos, ^Toi 
ZapdSrjs — Sitt); yap c'tt' airifi 7) iiranu/ila — dirrivlKa fihv fiKpuiaf ttjk opxVi *«' Toii 
v6piOvs eOcTOy ovK iveuTi ffcupus Siayvuvai, Ileptrai Se ai/rhv ot pvv cTri 'T(rToff7re&j, 
O0TM Stj ti oirXws ipoeri ysyopivai, as \ittv a/i<piyvof7<r6ai, Kol ouk elvoi /ittBeTi/, 
irdrepop Aapeiov irariip efre ho! &\\os ovtos tnrijpx^i' '"Ca-rdc-Trris. [See Appendix 
V. § 35.] 

8 Eutyohii Patriarchae Alexandrini Annates. Illustr. Selden, interpr. E. 
Pooook. Oxon. 1658, pp. 262-263, Mortuo Cyro Dario Babelis rege, post 
ipsum imperavit filius ipsius Kambysus annos novem : post quern Samardius 
Magus annum unum. Hie, Magus cognominatus est quod ipsius tempore 
floruerit Persa quidam Zaradasht (^cy-CuJUO, qui Magorum religionem 
condidit aedibus igni dedicatus. Post ipsum regnavit Dara primus, annos 
viginti. Post ilium Artachshast Longimanus cognominatus annos viginti 
quattuor. On this authority Floigl, following Roth, wishes to assign the 
year of Zoroaster's death to e.g. 522, cf. Cyrus und Herodot, p. 18, and 
Roth, Geschichte uns. abendldnd. Philosophie i. 353. 

* Bar "Ehhraya, Arabic Chronicon, p. 83, ed. Salhani, Beirut, 1890 (cited 
by Gottheil, Beferences to Zoroaster, p. 32). ' In those days (of Cambyses) 
came Zaradosht chief of the Magian sect, by birth of Adarbaijan, or, as 
some say, of Athor (Assyria). It is reported that he was one of Elijah's (!) 
disciples, and he informed the Persians of the sign of the birth of Christ.' 

[5 See Hyde Hist. Belig. vet. Pers. pp. 528-529.] 

(m) Pinally two other allusions are here added for the sake of 
completeness, as they have been interpreted as pointing to the fact 
that Zoroaster lived about the sixth century b.c. There seems to be 
nothing in them, however, to compel us to believe that Zoroaster is 
regarded as living only a short time before the events to which they 
allude. The first is a passage in Nicolaus Damascenus (1st century 
B.C.), who represents that when Cyrus was about to burn the unfort- 
unate Croesus, his attention was called to ZwpodcrTpov Xoyta, which 
forbade that fire should be defiled.* The second item of information 
is found in such references as represent Pythagoras as following 
Zoroaster's doctrines.^ Lastly, the association of Zoroaster's name 
with that of Thales, by Albirunl, has been noted above.' 

1 Nicolaus Damascenus Eragm. 65, Muller Fragm. Hist. Gfr. iii. 409 Selfiara 
Saifi6i/ia iveTTtTTe, Kol o'i re t?)s ^t$6\\7is xpV<^f^ol rd re Zupodfrrpov \6yta elffrieu 
Kpo7(rov fi€v oZv e^6wv €Tt juaWoc ^ -wdKai, ate^eiv. . . . 'V6v ye fx^v Ztapodffrpyiv 
Uepffat au' iKeivov dteTirav, jUiJtc veKpoiis Kaleiv, /a^^t' &Wws fiiaiveiv Trvp, Kol 
ird\ai TOvTO /caflecTTis rh v6niiJiov T(!t6 $e0aiu(rdfievoi. (Latin version) Persas 
. . . religio ac metus divSm incessit : Sibyllae quoque vaticinia ac Zoroa- 
stris oracula in mentem veniebant. Itaque clamitabant, multo, quam antea, 


contentius, ut Croesus seroaretur. ... At Fersae exinde sanxerunt juxta 
praecepta Zoroastris, ne cadavera cremare neque ignem contaminare post- 
hac liceret, quod quum apud eos ex veteri instituto olitinuisset, turn magis 
conflrmaverunt. Cf. de Harlez, Avesta traduit, Introd. pp. xliv, Ixvii. 

2 The principal references are to be found in Windischmann, Zoroastrische 
Studien, pp. 260-264, 274, from whose work they are taken. Several of these 
allusions mention Zoroaster's name directly ; in others we may infer it, since 
Pythagoras is made a student of the Magi, whom classical antiquity regards 
as the exponents of Zoroaster's teaching. Such allusions are : (a) Cicero, 
de Fin. 5. 29, ipse Pythagoras et Aegyptum lustravit et Persarum Magos 
adiit ; (fi) Valerius Maximus 8. 7 extern. 2, inde ad Persas profectus Mago- 
rum exactissimae prudeiiiiae se formandum tradidit; (7) Pliny, N.H. 30. 2. 1, 
Pythagoras, Empedocles, Democritus, Plato ad hanc (magieen) discendam 
navigavere; (5) Porphyrins, Vita Pylhag. 41, iwilKalToS etov, as iraph rav 
yiiyav ItimBaveTo, %v 'npo/i.d^TiP Ka\ov<nv e/ceicoi ; and Vita Pythag. 12, iv t6 
^a^vXitivt Tols '^' SAAots 'X.aXZaiois ffweyev^ro koX irphs Zd^parov [Ziparov, 
Nauok] (Zoroaster ?) d^i'/ceTo ; (e) Plutarch, de animae procr. in Timaeo 
2. 2, Zapdras 6 TiuBaySpov SiSoir/caAoj ; (Q Clemens Alexandrinus, Stromata, 

1, p. 357 (ed. Potter) Zapodffrpriv Se rhu ^dyov rhi/ Uepa-ril' i Ilti6a.y6pas iCri\a(rel> 
(MS. ed-fiKaia-ev), of. Cyrillus, adv. Jul. 3, p. 87, where Pythagoras is called 
vavdpLo-Tos ^TjAwT'^s of Zoroaster ; (ij) Suidas s.v. Pythagoras, Tlveay6pas ■ 
ovTos IJKova-e — ZdprjTos rod fidyov (is it Zoroaster?) ; (e) Apuleius Florid, 
p. 19 (ed. Altib.) sunt qui Pythagoram aiunt eo temporis inter captivos 
Cambysae regis Aegyptum cum adveheretur, doctores habuisse Persarum 
magos aa praecipue Zoroastrem omnia divini arcani antistitem; (1) in 
Lucian's Dialogue Menippus, § 6, p. 463, the Babylonian Magi are the pupils 
and successors of Zoroaster /j.o7 . . . e5o|e is Ba;3i/A.a;'a 4\e6vTa deTiSi^val rtms 
ray Maywy rav Zupod(7Tpov naBrjTuv Kol diaS^xoJv. Also some others. 

[2 See p. 161 above. The particular passage is one in which Albirum dis- 
cusses the various possibilities as to the date of Thales. He adds that ' if 
he (i.e. Thales) lived at the time of Kai Kubadh, he stands near to Zoro- 
aster, who belonged to the sect of the Harranians' (^Chron. p. 32, 1. 15, 
transl. Sachau).] 

B. Discussion' OF THE DatA. 

The material above collected presents most of the [ = orig. p. I6] 
external evidence that we have in regard to the age at 
which Zoroaster lived. We are now prepared for a more compre- 
hensive view of the subject, for a discussion of the data in hand, 
for a presentation of certain internal evidences that need to be 
brought out, and for arguments and possible deductions. Several 
points immediately suggest themselves for comment. 

First, in discussing the classical allusions above presented, one is 
justified from the connection in assuming that such allusions as are 


made to the name of Zoroaster as a religious teacher or sage, all 
refer to the one great prophet of ancient Iran. No account, I think, 
need therefore be taken of such views as assume the existence of two 
or of several Zoroasters, belonging to different periods in the world's 
history. Such a view was held by Suidas (s.v. Zoroastres) and was 
evidently earlier shared by Pliuy;^ it met with acceptance also 
among some of the old-fashioned writers in more recent times ; " but 
there is no real evidence in its favor, and it is due to an attempt to 
adjust the discrepancy existing in classical statements with regard 
to Zoroaster's date. History knows of but one Zoroaster. 

1 Pliny N. H. 30. 2. 1. sine dubio illic orta (ars Magica) in Perside a 
Zoroastre, ut inter auctores convenit. Bed unus hicfuerit, anpostea et alius, 
non satis constat. He adds a little later (30. 2. 8) diligentiores paulo ante 
huncQ-.e. Osthanem) Zoroastrem alium Proconnesium. 

2 E.g. Kleuker (quoting the Abt)6 Fouolier), Anhang zum Zend-Avesta, 
Bd. i. Thl. 2, p. 68-81. 

Second, among the three dates which may be deduced from the 
material above collected and which are summarized on p. 2 [= p. 162], 
we are justified upon reasonable grounds, I think, in rejecting the 
excessively early date of B.C. 6000 or thereabouts. The explanation 
above offered to account for the extravagant figures seems satis- 
factory enough. 

Third, such dates as might be arrived at from the sporadic allusions 
that associate the name of Zoroaster with Semiramis and Ninus, 
with Nimrod and Abraham, or with Baal, Bel, Balaam, as above dis- 
cussed, have little if any real foundation. In each instance there 
seem to me to be reasonable grounds for discarding them. 

There remains finally a comparatively large body of material that 
would point to the fact that Zoroaster flourished between the latter 
part of the seventh century and the middle of the sixth century 
before the Christian era. The material when sifted reduces itself : 
first, to the direct tradition found in two Pahlavi books, BQndahishn 
and Arta Viraf, which places Zoroaster's era three hundred years, 
or more exactly 258 years, before Alexander's day ; second, to the 
Arabic allusions which give the same date in their 
[= orig. p. 17] chronological computations and which in part lay 
claim to being founded upon the chronology of the 
Persians themselves;-^ third, to similar allusions elsewhere which 
place Zoroaster at about this period. 


1 Compare Alblruni, Chronology of Ancient Nations, p. 109, 112 (transl. 
Sachau) ; and the Modjmel al-Tewarikh, p. 142, 320, 330 (traduit Mohl, 
Journal Asiatique, xi. 1841), stating that the account is based on the 
Chronicle of Mobed Bahram. 

Certain objections may be raised to a view based upon this mate- 
rial last given. 

Pirst among these objections is a claim often urged, that the tra- 
ditional date rests upon an erroneous identification of Vishtaspa 
with Hystaspes the father of Darius. 1 cannot see, from the allu- 
sions or elsewhere, that the Persians made any such identification ; 
the impression gained from the material presented is rather in fact 
to the contrary ; one may recall, for example, how widely different 
the ancestry of Vishtaspa is from the generally received descent of 
Hystaspes the father of Darius (a point which Floigl and Eoth 
seem to have overlooked). It was only the classical writer Ammi- 
anus Marcellinus who, in antiquity, made any such identification. 
The point has already been sufficiently dealt with above, p. 14 
[= p. 167, and West now also treats it in like manner — SBE. xlvii. 
Introd. § 70]. 

A second objection may be brought on the plea that the tradi- 
tional date (7th to middle of 6th century b.c.) would not allow of 
the lapse of sufficient time to account for the difference in language 
between the Gathas and the Old Persian inscriptions and for certain 
apparent developments in the faith. Furthermore, that a longer 
period of time must be allowed to account for the difference 
between the fixed title Auramazda, 'Qpoixda-S-q's, current in western 
Persia in Achaemenian times, and the divided form of the divine 
name Ahu7-a Mazda (or Ahura alone and Mazda alone) as found in 
the Avesta, especially in the Zoroastrian Gathas. This point has 
been noticed in the interesting and instructive paper of Professor 
Tiele, Over de Oudheid van het Avesta, p. 16,^ who comes to the 
result that Zoroastrianism must have existed as early as the first 
half of the 7th century b.o.^ If we accept, as I believe we should, 
the theses that Vishtaspa ruled in eastern Iran, and that, although 
Zoroaster was a native of Adarbaijan, the chief scene of his religious 
activity was eastern Iran,^ and that the faith spread from Bactria 
westwards,^ I cannot see that these arguments militate against the 
traditional date under discussion. Dialectic differences between the 
Bactrian region and Persia Proper would sufficiently account for 
arguments based on language alone. This, added to national and 


individual differences, might well account for the fixed form of the 
name Auramazda among the Achaemenians as contrasted with the 
Avestan form. Who can say how rapidly the creed spread from 
the east to the west and what changes consequently in a short time 
may have resulted ? New converts in their zeal are often more rad- 
ical in progressive changes than first reformers. Per- 
[= orig. p. 18] sis, with its original difference in dialect, may in 
short time have developed the single title Auramazda 
from Ahura Mazda as watchword of church and state. See also 
note, p. 20, top [= p. 174]. 

1 Reprinted from the Mededeelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Weten- 
schappen, Afdeeling Letterkunde, 3de Reeks, Deel xi. 364-385. 

2 Tiele's little worlt argues admirably for the antiquity of the Avesta as 
opposed to Darmesteter's views for the lateness of the Gatlias. I wish I 
could be convinced by Professor Tiele (p. 19) that the names of the Median 
kings, Phraortes (fravaii), Kyaxares (uvaxJatara), Deiokes {*dahyuka) as 
well as Eparna, Sitiparna of the early Esarhaddon inscription (explained as 
containing hvardnah, ' glory '), are due to concepts originated by Zoroaster 
and are not merely marks of beliefs which Zoroastrianism inherited directly 
from existing Magism. The name of Darius's contemporary Khsathrita 
(Bh. 2. 15 ; 4. 19, Bh. e. 6) is not so important for the argument. I con- 
fess I should like to place Zoroaster as early as the beginning of the 7th 
century. The earlier, the better. [On Phraortes viewed as a Zoroastrian, 
compare more recently, Justi, in Preuss. Jahrhucher, Bd. 88, p. 258 ; 
Qrundriss d. iran. Philol. ii. p. 411.] 

' On eastern Iran, cf. Geiger, Ostiranische Eultur (Erlangen, 1882) and 
English translation of same, Darab D. P. Sanjana, Eastern Iranians 
(London, 1885-1886). 

* See Jackson, Zoroaster's Native Place, JAOS. xv. 230 seq. So in spite 
of Spiegel, ZDMG. xlv. 198 seq. 

A final objection may be raised as to the real historic worth and 
chronological value of the Persian tradition which places Zoroaster 
three centuries before Alexander. This it must frankly be said is 
the real point of the question. Is there a possibility of Arabic 
influence at work upon the statements of the Bundahishn and Arta 
Viraf [and Zat-sparam] ? Is the whole chronology of the Bunda- 
hishn and that of the Persians artificial?^ And did the Zoroas- 
trians intentionally tamper with history and bring Zoroaster down 
as late as possible in order that the millennial period might not be 
regarded as having elapsed without the appearance of a Saoshyant, 
or Messiah? 


^ Spiegel, Eranische Alterthuinskunde, i. 506, with Windischmann, regards 
the data of the Bundahishn as 'unzuverlassig,' but it must be remembered 
that his figures, ' 178 ' years for the period between Zoroaster and Alexan- 
der, now require correction to 258, which alters the condition of affairs. 
See West, SBE. v. 150-151, and Spiegel, ZDMG. xlv. 203. Compare 
especially de Harlez, Avesta traduit, Introd. p. ccxxviii. 

These questions require serious consideration in detail. The 
introduction to the chronological chapter of the Bundahishn (Bd. 34) 
does indeed read, according to one MS., 'on the reckoning of the 
years of the Arabs ' (see Bundahishn translated by West, SBE. v. 
149), but the word Tazhikan ' of the Arabs ' is not found in the other 
manuscripts. Moreover, the scientific investigator Albiruni, and 
also the Mujmal al-Tawarikh, whose data agree exactly with the 
Bundahishn, affirm that the dates given for the Kayanian kings are 
obtained from the records of the Persians themselves.^ 
There seems no reason, therefore, to doubt that the [= orig. p. 19] 
Bundahishn really represents the Persian chronology. 
But what the value of that chronology may be, is another matter. 
Personally I think it has real value so far as giving the approxi- 
mate period of three centuries before Alexander as Zoroaster's era. 
Every student of the classics knows the part that chronology plays 
with reference to the Magi ; every reader of the Avesta is familiar 
with ' the time of long duration ; ' every one who has looked into 
the scholarly work of Albiruni will have more respect for Persian 
chronology. Errors indeed there may be ; attention has been called 
above to the lack of agreement between the years assigned by tradi- 
tion to the reigns of the Zoroastrian Kayanian monarchs and the 
generally accepted dates of the reigns of Cyrus, Darius, and Xerxes ^ ; 
to the dynasty of these three kings there corresponds only the long 
rule of Vishtaspa (120 years) and a part of that of Bahman Ardashir 
Dirazdast, some of whose reign answers to that of Artaxerxes Longi- 
manus. As above said, it is difficult to identify the Kayanians 
of the tradition with the early Achaemenians of Greek history, but 
this need not nullify the real value of the traditional ' three centu- 
ries before Alexander.' What Masudi (c. a.d. 943) in his Indicatio 
et Admonitio can add on this subject is full of interest. Little atten- 
tion seems thus far to have been drawn to this important passage 
and to the explanation which it contains.^ Masudi is fully aware of 
the difference that exists between the Persian and the generally 
accepted chronology and he shows how it was brought about by 

174 APPENDIX 11 

Ardashlr's purposely shortening the period between Alexander and 
himself by causing about half the number of years to be dropped 
from the chronological lists, but the 300 years of Zoroaster before 
Alexander were allowed to remain untouched, for the old prophecy 
regarding the time of Alexander's appearance had been fulfilled. 
The passage in Barbier de Meynard is well worth consulting.' 

1 See note above, p. 8 [= p. 160]. 

2 Cf. Barbier de Meynard in Le Livre de Vindication et de V Admonition. 
(Ma50udi, Prairies d'Or, ix. 327-328). [See also the translation by Vaux, 
Mai;oudi, Le Livre de VAvertissement, p. 136 ; Paris, 1896.] 

3 See preceding note. I have since found the passage given by Spiegel in 
i:ran. AUerthumsJcunde, iii. 193 ; compare also Spiegel, ZDMQ. xlv. 202. 

C. Eesults. 

To draw conclusions, — although open to certain objections, still, 
in the absence of any more reliable data or until the discovery of 
some new source of information to overthrow or to substantiate the 
view, there seems but one decision to make in the case before us. 
Prom the actual evidence presented and from the material accessi- 
ble, one is fairly entitled, at least, upon the present merits of the 
case, to accept the period between the latter half of the seventh cen- 
tury and the middle of the sixth century e.g. [perhaps still better, 
between the middle of the seventh century and the first half of the 
sixth century b.c.J, or just before the rise of the Achaemenian 
power, as the approximate date of Zoroaster's life.' 

[= orig. p. 20] ' Since the above was written Dr. E. "W. West writes me 
(under date December 19, 1895) the interesting piece of 
information that his investigations into the history of the Iranian calendar 
have led him to the date B.C. 505 as the year in which a reform in the Per- 
sian calendar must have been instituted. He suggests that Darius, upon 
the conclusion of his wars and during the organizing of his kingdom and 
putting in force new acts of legislation, may with the aid and counsel of his 
priestly advisers have introduced the Zoroastrian names of the months 
which have supplanted the old Persian names which were given in the 
inscriptions. If this be so, the point may have a special bearing towards 
showing that the Achaemenians were Zoroastrians. Prom Albiruni, Chro- 
nology, pp. 17, 12 ; 55, 29 ; 205, 2 ; and 220, 19 (transl. Sachau), we know 
that Zoroaster himself must have occupied himself with the calendar. Ben- 
fey u. Stern, Ueber die Monatsnamen einiger alter Volker, p. 116, regarded 
the Medo-Persian year as having been introduced into Cappadocia probably 


as early as b.c. 750. [Dr. West's paper on the Parsi calendar has just 
appeared in The Academy for April 23, 1896.] [Later postscript (1898), 
West gives his results in SBE. xlvii. Introd. § 79 seq.] 

Similar results have been reached by others, or opinions to the 
same effect have been expressed ; for example, Haug,^ Justi (private 
letter),^ Geldner (personal communication),^ Casartelli,* and several 
names familiar to those acquainted with the field.^ Some effort 
might be made perhaps if the premises will allow it, and some 
attempts have been made, to define the period more exactly by a 
precise interpretation of the various time-allusions with reference to 
cardinal events in Zoroaster's life — the beginning of his ministry at 
the age of 30, the conversion of Vishtaspa in the prophet's 42d year, 
the death of Zoroaster at the age of 77 years." [See Appendix III.] 

1 Cf. Haug, Essays on the Farsis (West's Introduction, p. xlv.) ; although 
Haug had previously adopted various earlier eras for Zoroaster, e.g. b.c. 2300 
{Lecture on Zoroaster, Bombay, 1865), not later than b.c. 1000 {Essays, 
p. 299, vrhere the subject is discussed ; cf. also Essays, pp. 15, 136, 264). 

2 Personal letter from Professor Justi, dated June 14, 1892. 

8 Geldner formerly placed the date of Zoroaster as prior to b.c. 1000 (see 
article 'Zoroaster,' Encyclopedia Britannica, 9th edition). 

* Philosophy of the Mazdayasnian Beligion under the Sassanids, transl. 
Firoz Jamaspji, p. ii, 'about 600.' 

^ The best collections of material on the subject are to be found in de 
Harlez, Avesta traduit, 2d ed. Introduction, pp. xx-xxv, ccxiv. [See also de 
Harlez, The Age of the Avesta, in JA08., New Series, xvii. 349, London, 
1885, who finds no reason to place the Avesta earlier than 600 or 700 e.g., 
or in broader terms fixes ' the epoch of Zoroastrianism and the Avesta 
between 700 and 100 e.g.'], Spiegel, EA. i. 673-676, and Windischmann, 
Zoroastrische Studien, pp. 147, 162, 305 ; the latter suggested {Zor. Stud. 
p. 164) about B.C. 1000 as Zoroaster's date. The present writer {Aiiesta 
Chrammar, p. xi) once held the opinion that Zoroaster lived ' more than a 
thousand years before the Christian era.' The date assigned by the Parsi 
Orientalist K. E. Kama is about e.g. 1300. 

« E.g. Anquetil du Perron, Zend-Avesta, i. Pt. 2, p. 6, 60-62, assigns e.g. 
589-512 as the age of Zoroaster ; compare also Kleuker, Anhang zum Zend- 
Avesta, Bd. i. Thl. 1, pp. 327-374 ; Thl. 2, pp. 51-81 (Foucher). [Anquetil's 
monograph should be consulted.] Floigl {Cyrus und Herodot, p. 18), fol- 
lowing Roth, gives b.c 599-522 as Zoroaster's era and identifies Vishtaspa 
with Hystaspes the father of Darius. Neither Ploigl nor Both seem to take 
any account of the difference between the genealogy of Vishtaspa's ances- 
tors as given in the Old Persian inscriptions and the lineage given in the 
Avesta, Pahlavi, and later Persian works. Floigl does not, moreover, suffi- 
ciently take into consideration (p. 17) that 42 years (or at least 30) must be 


added in every instance to the 258 years before Alexander, as that was 
Zoroaster's age when Vishtaspa accepted the Faith. This would in any 
event place the date of Zoroaster's birth before e.g. 600. 

[ = orig. p. 21] The above results, if they be accepted ia the light 
at least of our present information on the subject, 
seem to be not vrithout importance for the history of early religious 
thought and of the development of ethical and moral teaching. If 
one carefully works through the material, it must be acknowledged 
that the most consistent and the most authoritative of all the actual 
statements upon the subject place the appearance of the prophet at 
a period between the closing century of Median rule and the rising 
wave of Persian power, that is, between the latter half of the 
seventh century and the middle of the sixth century b.c. ; [better 
between the middle of the seventh century and the former half of 
the sixth century b.c.J. It is the sowing of the fallow land that is 
to bring forth the rich fruits of the harvest. The teaching of 
Zoroaster must have taken deep root in the soil of Iran at the time 
when the Jews were carried up into captivity at Babylon (586-536), 
where they became acquainted with 'the law of the Medes and 
Persians which altereth not ' /the time was not far remote when 
the sage Confucius should expound to China the national tenets 
of its people, and the gentle Buddha on Ganges' bank should preach 
to longing souls the doctrine of redemption through renunciation. 
How interesting the picture, how full of instruction the contrast! 
And in this connection, the old question of a possible pre-historic 
Indo-Iranian religious schism ' comes perhaps once again into con- 
sideration.^ Certain theological and religious phenomena noticeable 
in Brahmanism are possibly not so early, after all, as has generally 
been believed. It may perchance be that Zoroastrianism in Iran 
was but the religious, social, and ethical culmination of the wave 
that had been gathering in strength as it moved along, and that was 
destined in India to spend its breaking force in a different way 
from its overwhelming course in the plateau land northwest of 
the mountains of Hindu Kush. 

1 The view strongly upheld by Haug. 

2 Deductions that might perhaps be made in the light of Hopkins, 
Beligions of India, pp. 177, 186, 212, n. 3. Consult especially the suggestive 
hints of Geldner, article ^ Zoroaster,'' Encyclopcedia Britannica, yrhere the 
much-mooted question of asura-ahura, daeva-deva, ' god-demon,' is discussed. 


The kingdom of Bactria was the scene of Zoroaster's zealous 
ministry, as I presume. [The question raised on this point is 
noticed in the present volume.] Born, as I believe, in Atropatene, 
to the west of Media, this prophet without honor in his own coun- 
try met with a congenial soil for the seeds of his teaching in eastern 
Iran. His ringing voice of reform and of a nobler faith found an 
answering echo in the heart of the Bactrian king, Vishtaspa, whose 
strong arm gave necessary support to the crusade that spread the 
new faith west and east throughout the land of Iran. Allusions 
to this crusade are not uncommon in Zoroastrian literature. Its 
advance must have been rapid. A fierce religious war which in a 
way was fatal to Bactria seems to have ensued with Turan. This 
was that same savage race in history at whose door the death of 
victorious Cyrus is laid. Although tradition tells the 
sad story that the fire of the sacred altar was quenched [= o"g. p. 22] 
in the blood of the priests when Turan stormed Balkh, 
this momentary defeat was but the gathering force of victory; 
triumph was at hand. The spiritual spark of regeneration lingered 
among the embers and was destined soon to burst into the flame 
of Persian power that swept over decaying Media and formed the 
beacon-torch that lighted up the land of Iran in early history. But 
the history of the newly established creed and certain problems in 
regard to the early Achaemenians as Zoroastrians belong elsewhere 
for discussion. 

[Addendum 1. In an article on 'The Date of the Avesta,' The Times of 
India, March 11, 1898, now draws attention to the fact that Darab Dastur 
Peshotan Sanjana has again called up the proposed Identification of Avestan 
Naidhyah Gaotema (in Yt. 13. 16) with the rishi Gautama whose son is Nodhas 
in the Veda. See this pamphlet Observations on Darmesteter's Theory, pp. 
25-31, Leipzig, 1898. On his point and on the other suggested identifications 
of the Avestan Gaotema with Gotama the Buddha, or with the Brahman 
Cangranghacah (see pp. 85-88 above), we may refer to what has been said by 
Windischmann, Mithra, p. 29, and to the references and discussion given by 
Justi, JSandbuch der Zendsprache, p. 99 (Leipzig, 1864), where good material 
will be found. Justi's statement in his Iran. Namenbuch, p. 110 (Marburg, 
1895) reads : ' Gaotema, vielleicht Name eines Gegners der Zarathustrischen 
Religion Yt. 13. 16 ; das Wort kbnnte auch appellativ sein ; Sanskrit gdtama.' 

In the passage I do not think that the words nd vydxano necessarily refer to 
Zoroaster at all, but that they allude to some later follower of the Faith who 
may have vanquished in debate some opponent of the Zoroastrian creed. Notice 
also Justi's ' eines Gegners der Zarathustrischen Religion.' I cannot therefore 
see that we shall lose anything if we accept the view which was first suggested 


by Haug, and interpret this allusion to Gaotama as a thrust at Buddhism, and 
regard naiSyah as a derogatory attribute, or connected with the Vedic root 

Color is given to such an interpretation because, farther on in the same Yasht 
(Yt. 13. 97), mention is made of the pious Saena, a great religious teacher and 
successor of Zoroaster, who flourished between one hundred and two hundred 
years after the prophet himself, or b.c. 531-431, if we accept the traditional 
Zoroastrian chronology, and who might therefore have been a contemporary 
with Buddha. Upon the date of Saena, see also Jivanji Jamshedji Modi, The 
Antiquity of the Avesta, Bombay, June, 1896. Saena belonged to the ancient 
territory of Saka-stana (Seistan) and thus to the region of White India; of. 
p. 45, n. 4, 72, n. 3, 87, n. 1, and Appendix IV. 

Now if in the particular case of Saena (and the lines are metrical and therefore 
probably original) the Yasht actually makes mention of a Zoroastrian apostle 
who lives a century or more after the great teacher, I do not think we are neces- 
sarily forced to place Gaotama back into the Vedic period. In other words, in 
the case of Gaotema as of Saena, the Yasht may be alluding to one who is bom 
after Zarathushtra, and may be hurling anathemas against an opposing and 
heretical religion (and that religion Buddhism) which began to flourish about 
the same time as the Yasht may have been written. Of the various identiflca- 
tions I should prefer that of Gotama the Buddha, rather than to call in the 
Vedas and Gautama whose son is Nodhas.] 

[Addendum 2. My pupil, Mr. Schuyler, draws my attention to a refer- 
ence in a work that was published in the middle of the last century, which is of 
interest because it deals with the Huns and places the date of Zoroaster about 
the year '683 avant Jesus-Christ. ' The reference is Deguignes, Histoire gen- 
erale des Huns, i. Pt. 2, p. 376, Paris, 1756.] 




(From Sacred Books of the East, xlvii. Introd. § 55.) * 

After investigating the traditional Zoroastrian chronology of the 
Bundahishn, and the statements of the other Pahlavi texts, which 
have been recorded in the preceding Appendix, Dr. E. W. West has 
compiled a series of chronological tables, synchronizing the Zoro- 
astrian and European systems. The statement of Bd. 34. 7, 8, 
places the death of Alexander 272 years after the coming of the reli- 
gion, i.e. after the thirtieth year of Zoroaster's life and of Vish- 
taspa's reign. Combining these dates, and allowing for an apparent 
omission of thirty-five years (which is explained), the items 323 -|- 
272 -|- 35 give as a result B.C. 660-583 as the date of Zoroaster, and 
B.C. 660-540 for Vishtaspa's reign,^ which in Oriental manner is 
apparently conceived of as dating from the king's birth. West's 
tables are now presented (SBE. xlvii. Introd. pp. xxviii-xxx) : — 

' If we adopt the abbreviations A.K. for " anno religionis " and B.E. 
for " before the religion," we are prepared to compile the following 
synopsis of Zoroastrian Chronology according to the millennial sys- 
tem of the Bundahishn, extended to the end of time, but dealing 
only with traditional matters, combined with the European dates of 
the same events, deduced from the synchronism of A.E. 300 with 
B.C. 331, as stated above in § 54 : ' — 

B.K. 9000, B.C. 9630. Beginning of the first millennium of Time ; and for- 
mation of the Fravashis, or primary ideas of the good creations, which 
remain insensible and motionless for 3000 years (Bd. I, 8 ; XXXIV, 1). 

1 Through the courtesy of Dr. E. W. for which kindness I wish to express 

West and of Professor F. Max Miiller, my appreciative thanks. — A. V. W. J. 
editor of the Sacred Books, I have ^ gge iSBE. xlvii. Introd. § 70. 

been allowed to reproduce these pages ; 



B.R. 6000, E.C.6630. Beginning of the fourtli millennium, when the spiritual 
body of Zarattisht is framed together, and remains 3000 years with the 
archangels (Dk. VII, ii, 15, 16), while the primeval man and ox exist undis- 
turbed in the world, because the evil spirit is confounded and powerless 
(Bd. I, 20, 22 ; III, 1, 3, 5 ; XXXIV, 1). 

B.R. 3000, B.C. 3630. Beginning of the seventh millennium, when the evil 
spirit rushes into the creation on new-year's day, destroys the primeval ox, 
and distresses Gayomart, the primeval man (Bd. I, 20 ; III, 10-20, 24-27 ; 
XXXIV, 2). Z. appears to remain with the archangels for 2969 years 

B.R. 2970, B.C. 3600. Gayomart passes away (Bd. Ill, 21-23 ; XXXIV, 2). 

B.K. 2930, B.C. 3560. Masye and Masyaoi had grown up (Bd. XV, 2 ; XXXIV, 

B.K. 2787, B.C. 3417. Accession of Hoshang (Bd. XXXIV, 3). 

B.R. 2747, B.C. 3377. Accession of Takhmorup (ibid. 4). 

B.R. 2717, B.C. 3347. Accession of Yim (ibid.). 

B.R. 2000, B.C. 2630. Beginning of the eighth millennium. Accession of Dahak 
(ibid. 4, 5). 

B.R. 1000, B.C. 1630. Beginning of the ninth millennium. Accession of Fretiin 
(ibid. 5, 6). 

B.R. 500, B.C. 1130. Accession of Mantishcihar (ibid. 6). 

B.K. 428, B.C. 1058. Spendarmat comes to Manushcihar at the time of Frasiyav's 
irrigation works (Zs. XII, 3-6). [West's brief remarks on correction of the 
MSS. here omitted.] 

B.K. 380, E.o. 1010. Accession of Auz5bo (Bd. XXXIV, 6). 

B.R. 375, B.C. 1005. Accession of Kal-Kobat (ibid. 6, 7). 

B.R. 360, B.C. 990. Accession of Kal-Us (ibid. 7). 

B.R. 300, B.C. 930. Zaratusht first mentioned by the ox that Srito killed (Zs. 

XII, 7-20). 

B.R. 210, B.C. 840. Accession of Kal-Khusrol (Bd. XXXIV, 7). 

B.R. 150, B.C. 780. Accession of Kal-Lohrasp (ibid.). 

B.R. 45, B.C. 675. The Glory descends from heaven at the birth of DQktak (Zs. 

XIII, 1). 

B.R. 30, B.C. 660. Accession of KaI-Vishtasp(Bd. XXXIV, 7). Vohu- 
mano and Ashavahishto descend into the world with a stem of Horn (Dk. 
VII, ii, 24). Zarattisht is born (ibid, v, 1). 

B.R. 23, B.C. 653. Z. is seven years old when two Karaps visit his father, and 
Diirasrobo dies (Bk. VII, iii, 32, 34, 45). 

B.R. 15, B.C. 645. Z. is fifteen years old when he and his four brothers ask for 
their shares of the family property (Zs. XX, 1). 

B.K. 10, B.C. 640. Z. leaves home at the age of twenty (ibid. 7). 

A.R. 1, B.C. 630. Beginning of the tenth millennium. Z. goes forth to his con- 
ference with the sacred beings on the 45th day of the 31st year of Vishtasp's 
reign (Dk. VII, iii, 51-62 ; VIII, 51 ; Zs. XXI, 1-4). 

A.R. 3, B.C. 628. Z. returns from his first conference in two years, and preaches 
to Aurvalta-dang and the Karaps without success (Dk. VII, iv, 2-20). 

A. It. 11, B.C. 620. After his seventh conference, in the tenth year he goes to 


Vishtasp ; Metyomah is also converted (ibid. 1, 65 ; Zs. XXI, 3 ; XXIII, 

1, 2, 8). 
A.K. 13, B.C. 618. Twelve years after Z. went to conference, Vislitasp accepts 

the religion, though hindered for two years by the Karaps (Dk. VII, v, 

1 ; Zs. XXIII, 5, 7). 
A.K. 20, B.C. 611. A Kavig, son of Kundah, is converted (Zs. XXIII, 8). 
A.a. 30, B.C. 601. Defeat of Arjasp and his Khyons (ibid). 
A.R. 40, B.C. 591. Vohilnem is born (ibid.). About this time the Avesta is 

written by Jamasp from the teaching of Z. (Dk. IV, 21 ; V, iii, 4 ; VII, v. 11). 

[Compare also Dk. III. vii, 1, 8BE. xxxvii. 406.] 
A.K. 48, B.C. 583. Z. passes away, or is killed, aged seventy-seven years 

and forty days, on the 41st day of the year (Dk. V. iii, 2 ; VII. v, 1 ; Zs. 

XXIII, 9). 
A.K. 58, B.C. 573. Arrival of the religion is known in all regions (Dk. VII, vi, 

12). [Compare also Dk. IV, 21-22, 8BE. xxxvii. 412-413.] 
A.R. 63, B.C. 568. Frashoshtar passes away (Zs. XXIII, 10). 
A.R. 64, B.C. 567. Jamasp passes away (ibid.) 
A.K. 63, B.C. 558. HangaurQsh, son of Jamasp, passes away (ibid.). 
A.R. 80, B.C. 551. Asmok-khanvato passes away, and Akht the wizard is killed 

A.R. 91, B.C. 540. Accession of Vohuman, son of Spend-dat (Bd. XXXIV, 7, 8). 
A.R. 100, B.C. 531. Seno is born (Dk. VII, vii, 6). 
A.R. 200, B.C. 431. Seno passes away (ibid.; Zs. XXIII, 11). 
A.K. 203. B.C. 428. Accession of Humal (Bd. XXXIV, 8). 

[Some additional dates are given by Dr. West, which include the 
invasion of Alexander (a.r. 300 = e.g. 331) and his death (a.e. 308 
= B.C. 323), and carry the chronology down to the final millennium 
of the world (a.k. 3028, a.d. 2398).] 







A. Classical References 186-191 

1. Bactria and the East 186-188 

a. Cephalion. ^ g. Ammianus Maroellinus. 

b. Theon. h. Orosius. 

c. Justin. i. Augustine. 

d. Arnotius. j. Isidorus. 

e. Eusebius. k. Hugo de S. Viotore. 

f. Epiphanius. 

2. Media (Persia) and the West 189-190 

a. Pliny the Elder. g. Gregory of Tours. 

b. Clemens Alexandrinus. h. Chronicon Paschale. 
e. Origen. i. (Georgius Syncellus). 

d. Diogenes Laertius. j. Suidas. 

e. Porphyrius. k. Michael Glycas. 

f. Laotantius. 

Estimate of the Classical Allusions ... 191 

B. Geibntal Refeeences — all imply Western Iran .... 191-205 

1. Adarbaijan (Atropatene). 

a. Zoroastrian Literature 193-197 

a. Bundahishn (20. 32). c. Zat-sparam. 

b. Bundahishn (24. 15). d. Avesta. 

j3. MohammedanLiterature 197-201 

a. Ibn Khurdadhbah. g. Shahrastani. 

b. Ahmad Yahya al-Baladhuri. h. Ibn al-Athir. 

c. Ibn Fakih al-Hamadhanl. 1. Yakut. 

d. Tabari. j. Kazwini. 

e. Masudi. k. Bar 'Ebhraya. 

f. Hamzah al-Isfahanl. 1. Abulfeda. 

Estimate of Mohammedan Allusions . . . 201 




2. Ragha, Rai (Media Rhagiana) 202-205 

a. Ayesta (Vd. 1. 15). 

b. Avesta (Ys. 19. 18). 

c. Zat-sparam. 

Conclusion as to Zoroaster's Native Place .... 205 


Genekal Remarks 205-207 

1. Bactria and the East 208-219 

Geographical allusions in the Avesta and in Pahlavi . . . 208 

Kavl dynasty in the east 209 

Allusions to Balkh 209-210 

Where was Vishtaspa's capital 210 

Sacrifices by Vishtaspa — discussion 211-213 

Where was Arejat-aspa's capital — the Hyaonians . . . 213-214 

Scene of the Holy Wars 214-216 

Location of the sacred fires 216-217 

Minor points 217-218 

R6sum6 of the Eastern View 218-219 

2. Media and the "West 219-224 

C. de Harlez 219-220 

Spiegel 220 

Other scholars 221 

Justi's views 221-222 

Additional arguments 222-224 

R6sum6 of the Western View 224 

General Summary 224-225 


With regard to the native place of the founders of three of the 
great Oriental religions — Buddhism, Confucianism, Mohammedan- 
ism — the authorities are in agreement for the most part, and the 
recent discoveries with reference to Buddha's birthplace have ren- 
dered assurance doubly sure at least in his case. With respect to 
Zoroaster's native land, however, and with regard to the exact early- 
home of Zoroastrianism, the case is different. In classic times 

1 [The question with regard to Zoro- time is reproduced here, but it has 

aster's native place has been exam- been largely augmented and rewritten, 

ined by the present writer in JAGS. and the subject is now treated entirely 

XV. 221-232. Some of the material anew, especially with regard to the 

which was briefly presented at that scene of Zoroaster's mtaistry.] 

181 APPENDIX ir 

seven cities claimed a share in the honor of being the birthplace of 
the poet Homer; hardly less can be said of the prophet Zoroaster, 
if we take into account the various opinions which have been held 
on the subject of his origin. The question is one of interest, for 
with this problem there is also closely connected the question as to 
where we shall place the cradle of the religion of Mazda. 

The natural uncertainty as to whether a religious teacher's birth- 
place or early home is necessarily identical with the scene of his 
religious activity complicates the problem considerably. Mani- 
festly it is fallacious to assume that the scene of Zoroaster's min- 
istry must likewise of necessity have been his place of origin. This 
fact must be kept in mind when we examine the arguments that 
have been brought forward by some to prove that the east of Iran, 
or Bactria, must assuredly have been the original home of Zoroaster 
as well as the scene of the reform work of the so-called ' Bactrian 
Sage.' The same fact, on the other hand, must be kept equally in 
view when the claim is made that Zoroaster came from western 
Iran, whether from Atropatene or from Media Proper, or from Persia. 
In the present memoir an endeavor will be made to keep the two 
sides of the question apart, and to discuss, (1) first, the question of 
Zoroaster's native place ; (2) second, the scene of his ministry. 

With regard to the disposition of the subject, authorities are 
agreed that we must look either to the east of Iran or to the west of 
Iran for a solution of the problem. The question of north or of 
south is exchided by the nature of the subject. Since this is the 
case, we may examine the general points of view, and resolve these 
into three classes : — 

1. Pirst, the view that the home of Zoroaster is to be placed in 
the east of Iran, in the Bactrian region, and that the scene of his 
religious reform belongs especially to that territory. 

2. Second, the view that the home of Zoroaster is to be placed 
in western Iran, either in Media Proper (Media Ehagiana) or in 
Adarbaijan (Atropatene), and that the scene of his ministry was 
confined to that region. 

3. Third, a compromise view, which maintains that Zoroaster 
arose in western Iran, in Adarbaijan (Atropatene), or in Media 
Proper (Media Bhagiana), but that he taught and preached in Bac- 
tria as well. 

In this threefold summary it will be noticed in the first place 
that Persis, or Persia in the restricted sense, is left out of considera- 



tion — a justifiable omission because there is no especial ground for 
believing that Zoroaster originated in Persia itself. In the second 
place, it may be stated that there seem to be just reasons for coming 
to a definite conclusion that Zoroaster actually arose in the west of 
Iran. In the third place, it may be added that a definite conclusion 
as to the scene of Zoroaster's ministry need not for the moment 
be drawn, but that this problem must be discussed as a sequel to 
the question of his place of origin. 

With these points to be kept in mind by way of introduction, and 
with this word of caution, we may proceed to examine the testi- 
mony of antiquity on the subject, which is the source from which 
we draw our information ; after that we may go on to present argu- 
ments, or to draw deductions, which are based upon the material 
that is gathered. A division of the sources may be made into two 
classes : (a) Classical sources, Greek or Latin ; (&) Oriental author- 
ities, either Iranian or non-Iranian. The testimony of these wit- 
nesses will be taken first with reference to the light they may 
throw upon the native country of the Prophet.' 

1 Partial Bibliograpliy. Tor 
general references, see Jackson, Where 
was Zoroaster's Native Placet JA08. 
XV. pp. 221-232. Consult also Appen- 
dix V. below. The principal classical 
passages have likewise already been 
given by Windischmann, Zoroastrische 
Stiidien, p. 260 seq. (tr. by Darab 
D. P. Sanjana, Zarathushtra in the 
Q-dthds and, in the Oreeh and Roman 
Classics, p. 65b, Leipzig, 1897). This 
material is now to be supplemented 
considerably by references which have 
since become accessible in Pahlavi lit- 
erature, and by abundant allusions 
found in Arabic and Syriac writers. 
For the latter, see Gottheil, Refer- 
ences to Zoroaster in Syriac and Arabic 
Literature, Drisler Classical Studies 
(Columbia University Press), New 
York, 1894; for example, pp. 32, 33 
(6is), 34, 37, 39, 40 (Ms), 42 n., 44, 48 
(Ms). These latter 'Eeferences to 
Zoroaster ' will be constantly referred 
to in the present article. Further- 

more, the general question of Zoroas- 
ter's native place has often been 
discussed ; it is sufBcient to mention 
Hyde, Historia Beligionis veterum 
Persarum, p. 310 seq., Oxon. 1700 ; 
Barnabfe Brisson, De regio Persarum 
Principatu, p. 385 seq. , editio Argent. 
1710 (orig. ed. Paris, 1590) ; Anquetil 
du Perron, Zend-Avesta, tome i. Pt. 2, 
p. 5 seq., Paris, 1771 ; Spiegel, Eran- 
ische AUerthumsTcunde, i. 676-684 (tr. 
by Darab D. P. Sanjana, Geiger's 
Eastern Iranians, ii. 179-189, London, 
1886) ; C. de Harlez, Avesta traduit, 
Introd. pp. 23-25, 2d ed. Paris, 1881 ; 
Darmesteter, Zend-Avesta, tr. Introd. 
pp. 47-49, SBE. iv. 1st ed. Oxford, 

Special notice is not taken here of 
works relating to the home of the 
Avesta itself as a sacred book, although 
this question is more or less directly 
connected with the present subject. 
If references be desired, one may 
find the more important bibliographi- 



A. Classical References to Zoroaster's Nationality 

The classical references which allude to the country of Zoroaster 
seem very contradictory if they be viewed alone, and they are doubt- 
less responsible for much of the uncertainty which has prevailed on 
the subject. It must also be remembered that a man is sometimes 
known to fame through his adopted country rather than through 
the land of his nativity. Although often conflicting, these classical 
references are of service in argument ; it is well, therefore, briefly 
to present them, first giving those statements which connect Zoro- 
aster's name with the west of Iran, with Media or Persia ; second, 
giving those citations which imply that Zoroaster belonged to Bac- 
tria or eastern Iran. Most of the allusions date from the earlier 
centuries of the Christian era, or somewhat later, although claims 
may be made in one or two instances that the statements rest 
directly upon older authority. 

1. Bactria — Classical References placing Zoroaster in Eastern Iran 

Several allusions in the classical writers of Greece and Eome 
point to the fact that Zoroaster was thought of as a Bactrian, or, at 
least, as exercising his activity in the east of Iran. The writers 
seem to have somewhat of a hazy notion that Zoroaster was not a 
Magian only, but that he was a king and military leader, the oppo- 
nent of Ninus and Semiramis. There appears to be a reminiscence 
of an early struggle between a presumable eastern Iranian mon- 
archy and the Assyrian power of the west. Most of the classical 
allusions to Bactria seem to indicate a common source ; this 
source may reasonably be traced back to a misunderstood allusion 

cal material on the subject of the 237 seq., Berlin, 1882 ; Geiger's views 

Avestan cradle noted by Geiger, Vater- are criticized also by de Harlez, Das 

land und Zeitalter des Awestd und Alter und Heimath des Avesta, Bez- 

scincr ^Mter, Abhandlungen der kgl. zenberger's Beitrage, xii. 109 seq., 

bayr. Alsad. d. Wiss. philos.-philol. 1887 ; and by Spiegel, Ueber das 

CI. 1884, pp. 315-386. Geiger's list Vaterland und Zeitalter des Awestd, 

may be supplemented by de Harlez, Zweiter Artikel, in ZDMQ. xli. 280 

Der Avestische Kalender und die Hei- seq., 1887. Consult Darmesteter, Le 

math der Avesta-Meligion, Berliner Zend-Avesta, iii. Introd. pp. 89-90, 

Orientalische Congress, Abhdgn. ii. Paris, 1893. 


in Ctesias.* In his legendary accounts, Ctesias refers to wars car- 
ried on between Ninus and Semiramis and 'Ofuaprijs (variants, 'E^a- 
6prt]<s, XaopTT]':, ZaopT-qi) ; the allusion in Oxyartes (Av. Uxsyaprdta) 
is not to Zoroaster, although Cephalion, Justin, and Arnobius, who 
draw on Ctesias, make Zoroaster a Bactrian and the opponent of 
Ninus. The matter has been commented upon above (Appendix II. 
154 seq.). The statements of these particular writers, however, are 
added for the sake of completeness, and they are supplemented by 
other classical citations. See also Appendix II. 

(a) Fragments of Cephalion (a.d. 120) which are preserved in 
the Armenian version of Eusebius, Chron. 1. 43, ed. Aucher, 
describe the rebellion of the Magian Zoroaster, King of the Bac- 
trians, against Semiramis : de Zoroastri Magi Bactrianorum regis 
certamine ac debellatione a S emir amide. Compare also, in this con- 
nection, Georgius Syncellus, Appendix V. § 41 below (cf . ed. Dind. 1. 
p. 315), and the reputed work of Moses of Khorene, 1.6, 'le mage 
Zoroastre, roi des Bactriens, c'est a-dire des M6des ' ; or, on the other 
hand, Moses of Khorene, 1. IT, ' Zoroastre (Zeratasd), mage et chef 
religieux des Medes (Mar) ' — see Langlois, Collections des Historiens 
de I'Armdnie, ii. 59 and 69, also Appendix VI. § 1 below ; here Zoro- 
aster is a contemporary of Semiramis, and he seizes the government 
of Assyria and Mneveh; Semiramis flees before him, and she is 
killed in Armenia (Langlois, ii. 69). See also Gilmore, Ktesia^ Per- 
sika, p. 30 n. ; Spiegel, Eran. Alterthumskunde, i. 682 ; Windischmann, 
Zor. Stud. pp. 302, 303 ; Miiller, Fragm. Hist. Or. iii. 627, v. 328. For 
the statement of Thomas Arzrouni, see p. 217 below and Appendix VI. 

(b) Theon (a.d. 130) Progymnasmata, 9, Trepl crvyKpto-ews, ed. 
Spengel, Bhet. Groec. ii. 115, speaks of ' Zoroaster the Bactrian ' — 
Zuipoda-Tpov Tov BaKTpLov — in connection with Semiramis. See Ap- 
pendix V. § 8 below, and cf . Windischmann, Zor. Stud. p. 290 ; Spie- 
gel, Eran. Alterthumskunde, i. 677. 

(c) Justin (c. A.D. 120), in his epitome of Pompeius Trogus' 
Hist. Philippic. 1. 1. 9-10, makes Zoroaster a king of Bactria, a 
Magian, and the opponent of Ninus — helium cum Zoroastre rege Bac- 
trianorum. See Appendix V. § 10 below. 

(d) Arnobius (a.d. 297), Adversus Gentes, 1. 5, also mentions a 
battle between the Assyrians and the Bactrians, under the leader- 
ship respectively of Ninus and Zoroaster : inter Assyrios et Bactrianos, 
Nino quondam Zoroastreque ductoribus. See Appendix V. § 16. 

1 See also Justi in Orundr. d. iran. Philol. ii. 402. 

188 APPENDIX 17 

(e) Eusebius (a.d. 300), Ghron. 4. 35, ed. Aucher, has a like allu- 
sion to Zoroaster, Bactria, and Ninus : Zoroastres Magus rex Bactri- 
anorum clarus habetur adversum quern Ninus dimicavit ; and again 
(Windisclimann, p. 290), Prceparatio Evang. 10. 9. 10, ed. Dind. p. 

560, NtVos, KaQ' ov Ziapoda-rprj^ o Mayos BaKTptoJi' i^ao-iXivcre. See 

Appendix V. § 18 below. 

(f) Epiphanius of Constantia (a.d. 298^03) Adv. Hcereses, Lib. 
I. torn. i. 6 (torn. i. col. 185 seq., ed. Migne) associates Zoroaster's 
name with Nimrod, and states that Zoroaster came to the east and 

founded Bactria : Tiiapoacnprji, os irpocno ^u>prj(Ta% irn to. avaxoXiKO, p-iprj 

oLMo-Tr]'; yCyvcTai BaKTpuiv. See Appendix V. § 21 below. The same 
statement is later repeated by Procopius of Gaza, see Appendix V. 
§ 33 below. 

(g) Ammianus Marcellinus, 23. 6. 32, in discussing magic rites, 
connects Zoroaster's name with Bactria, but identifies Hystaspes 
(Vishtaspa) with the father of Darius : cuius scientiae saecuUs priscis 
multa ex C'haldaeorum arcanis Bactrianus addidit Zoroastres, 
deinde Hystaspes rex prudentissimus, Darei pater. See Appendix V. 
§ 22 below. 

(h) Paulus Orosius (5th century a.d.) states that Ninus con- 
quered and slew Zoroaster of Bactria, the Magician. Eor the citar 
tion and for the Anglo-Saxon version see p. 167 and Appendix V. 
§ 27 below. 

(i) Augustine (a.d. 354-430), de Civ. Dei, 21. 14 (torn. vii. col. 728, 
ed. Migne) follows the same idea in making Zoroaster a Bactrian 
whose name is associated with Ninus : a Nino quippe rege Assyri- 
orum, cum esset ipse (Zoroastres) Bactrianorum, bello superatus est. 
See Appendix V. § 28 below. 

(j) Isidorus (a.d. 570-636), Etymol. 8. 9 (torn. iii. col. 310, ed. 
Migne) : Magorum primus Zoroastes rex Bactrianorum, quem Ninus 
rex Assyriorum proelio interfecit-; and he alludes to a statement of 
Aristotle regarding Zoroaster's writings. See Appendix V. § 38 
below. Again Isidorus, Ghron. (torn. v. col. 1024, ed. Migne) : liac 
aetate magica ors in Per side a Zoroaste Bactrianorum rege 
reperta. A Nino rege occiditur. 

(k) Hugo de Sancto Victore (died a.d. 1140), Adnot. Elucid. in 
Pentateuchon — in Gen. (tom. i. col. 49, ed. Migne): rex Bactriae 
Nino vicinus et vocatus Zoroastes, inventor et auctor maleficiae math- 
ematicae art is. 


2. Media or Persia — Classical References placing Zoroaster in 
Western Iran 

There are nine or ten classical allusions, on the other hand, which 
connect Zoroaster's name with Media, or rather with Persia, the 
latter term often being used doubtless in a broader sense. 

(a) Pliny the Elder (a.d. 23-79), if. H. 30. 2. 1, for example, 
gives his opinion that the art of the Magi arose in Persia with Zoro- 
aster, but he is in doubt as to whether there were two Zoroasters or 
only one, and he alludes to a Proconnesian Zoroaster. Thus, in his 
first statement, he writes, N. H. 30. 2. 1, sine dubio illic {ars Magica) 
orta in Perside a Zoroastre, ut inter auctores convenit. Sed unus hie 
fuerit, an postea alius, non satis constat. Again, in his second state- 
ment, when speaking of the Magian Osthanes, who accompanied 
Xerxes to Greece, he says, N. H. 30. 2. 8, diligentiores paulo ante 
hunc (Osthanem) ponunt Zoroastrem alium Proconnesium. 
See Appendix V. § 5. 

Perhaps in this same connection may be mentioned the curious 
remark of the Scholiast to the Platonic Alcibiades (see Appendix 
V. § 1 below), to the effect that, according to some, Zoroaster was a 
'Hellenian,' or that he had come from the mainland beyond the sea: 

Zwpoaorpijs . . . ov ol fieu "EXXt^vo, ol Se rdv ek t^S virip ttjv /xeyoXr;i' 
6d\a(raav rjirupov u>piJ.rjiJ,ivoiv ^TraTSaJ <f>acri,, k, t. X. See Appendix V . 

§ 1, and cf. Windischmann, Zor. Stud. p. 275 n. 

(b) Clemens Alexandrinus (a.d. 200) speaks of Zoroaster either 
as a Mede or as a Persian, with an allusion incidentally to 
Pamphylia : Strom, i. (tom. i. col. 773, ed. Migne), Zoipoda-Tprjv tov 
fjidyov t6v JUpa-rjv ; and Strom, i. (tom. i. col. 868, ed. Migne), Ziopo- 
da-Tpt)'; 6 M^Sos. Cf. again Strom, v. on IlajiK^uXos. See Appendix 
V. § 13 below. 

(c) Origenes (a.d. 185-254), Contra Celsum i. (tom. i. col. 689, ed. 
Migne), speaks of Zoroaster as a Persian — tov Uepa-rjv Zmpoda-Tp-qv. 
See Appendix V. § 14. 

(d) Diogenes Laertius (flor. c. a.d. 210), de Vit. Philos. Promm. 
2, writes of ' Zoroaster the Persian,' — Zaypoda-rprjv tov Uipcrrjv, — 
and apparently bases various statements which he makes about 
him on the authority of Hermodorus (b.c. 250?) and Xanthus of 
Lydia (b.c 500-450). The text should be consulted; see Appen- 
dix V. § 15 below. 

(e) Porphyrins (a.d. 233-304), de Antra Nymph. 6. 7, refers, at 


least, to Zoroaster's retirement into a cave ' in tlie mountains of Per- 
sia ' : ZoipodcTTpov avTO<j>ve'; cnrrjXaiov Iv toli TrX-qrriov opetri, Trj<; Ilepo-tSos. 

The context shows that the region of Persia in a general sense is 
intended. See Appendix V. § 17, and of. Windischmann, Mithra, 
Abh. f. Kunde d. Morgenl. i. 62, Leipzig, 1857. 

(f) Lactantius (about a.d. 300), Inst. 7. 16, refers to Hystaspes 
(Zoroaster's patron) as an ancient king of Media, long antedating 
the founding of Rome: Hystaspes quoque, qui fuit Medorum rex 
antiquissimus (cf. Migne, Patrolog. Lat. tom. 6, and Windischmann, 
Zor. Stud. p. 259, 293). 

(g) Gregory of Tours (a.d. 538-693), Hist. Francor. 1. 5 (col. 164 
seq., ed. Migne), identifying Zoroaster with Chus (Cham or Ham), 
places him among the Persians, to whom he is said to have immi- 
grated: hie ad Persas transiit; Mine Persae vocitavere Zoroastrem. 
See Appendix V. § 37. 

(h) Chronicon Paschale or Chron. Alexandrinum (a.d. 7th cen- 
tury, but with spurious additions a.d. 1042), col. 148 seq., ed Migne, 

has o Ztopoacrrpos o dcrrpovoyuos Hipcroiv 6 Trepi/Sor/TO's. Again the allu- 
sion is very general in sense. See Appendix V. § 39. 

(i) It may be noted merely in passing that Georgius Syncellus 
(about A.D. 800), Chron. i. p. 147, alludes to a Zoroaster who was 
one of the Median rulers over Babylon more than a thousand years 
before the Christian era. JSTo emphasis need be laid upon the pas- 
sage, nor any stress upon identifying the name necessarily with the 
Prophet ; the chief interest of the allusion consists in its showing 
that the name Zoroaster was found in Media. See Justi, Gfrundriss 
der iran. Phil. ii. 402 ; Windischmann, Zor. Stud. p. 302 ; Haug, A 
Lecture on Zoroaster, p. 23, Bombay, 1866. Consult Appendix V. 
§ 41 below. 

(]■) Suidas (about a.d. 970), s.v. Z(opoa,a-Tprj<s, assumes a second 
famous representative of the name, a Perso-Median sage (Ilepo-o- 
/i^Sijs, o-o<^os). This is evidently the Prophet. See Appendix V. § 45. 

(k) Michael Glycas (flourished about a.d. 1160), Ann. Pars ii. col. 
253, ed. Migne, repeats the statements current about Ninus, Semi- 
ramis, and Zoroaster, whom he speaks of under the general term of 
Persian, — Zwpdao-Tpog o TrepijSoriTos Hepa-wv acTTpovo/xo^, — and he adds 
several allusions to the magic art in Media and Persia : tyjv aa-Tpovofj-Uv 

XiyovTai TTpwrov eiptjKivai ^a^vXwvioi 8ia Ziopoa.<TTpov, Sevrepov 81 eSe^avro 
01 Aiymrnoi; Trjv 8e fiayuav fvpov M^Sot, eira Ilep<T(u. See Appendix 

V. § 47. 


Estimate of the Classical Allusions. — The classical allusions on 
the subject of Zoroaster's nationality are rather contradictory and 
conflicting. They refer to Bactria on the one hand and to Media 
and Persia on the other. The allusions to Persia are doubtless to 
be taken in a broad and general sense. It will be noticed, moreover, 
that the direct place of birth is not necessarily implied in these 
national appellatives. In point of time, few of the classical passages 
are much older than the more direct Oriental allusions ; some of 
them are even later. They are of value chiefly for bringing out 
both sides of the question of eastern Iran and western Iran, and they 
are of importance when checked by tradition or when used for 
throwing additional light on tradition. 

B. Oriental References to Zoroaster's Place of Origin 
— The Tradition 

Laying the classical authorities aside, we may now have recourse 
to the more direct Oriental tradition. For the most part the 
Oriental material is either directly Iranian or it is Arabic matter 
drawn from Iranian sources. This gives it a special value. The 
statements on the subject may therefore be taken up in detail ; the 
allusions found in the Pahlavi or patristic writings of Zoroastrianism 
will first be presented; these will then be elucidated further by 
references in Arabic and Syriac authors ; and, finally, they will be 
judged in the light of the Avesta itself. If the Oriental citations be 
examined critically, they will be found generally to be quite con- 
sistent in their agreement on the place of Zoroaster's origin. 

■Western Iran — Atropatene, Media— the Scene of Zoroaster's Appear- 
ance according to Oriental Sources 

There is a general uniformity among Oriental writings which 
touch on the subject in locating the scene of Zoroaster's appearance 
in western Iran, either in Adarbaijan (Atropatene) or in Media 
Proper (Media Rhagiana). The city of UrmI (mod. Urumiah, 
Oroomiah), Shiz, or the district round about Lake Oroomiah (A v. 
Caecasta or Caecista), and Eai (Av. Eagha) are the rivals for the 
honor of being his home. The sea of Caecista is the Galilee of 
Zoroastrianism ; ShIz and Eagha, the Nazareth and the Bethlehem 
of Iran. Urmi and Shiz represent Atropatene ; Eai (Eagha) stands 
for Media Proper. 

192 APPENDIX ir 

The rivalry between the two regions mentioned, and the associa- 
tion of Zoroaster's name, first with Media Atropatene (Adarbaijan), 
and then with the Median Eal (Media Ehagiana), happily finds an 
explanation in a remark made by Shahrastani (a.d. 1086-1153).^ 
This Arab writer gives us the key to the problem when he says of 
Zoroaster that 'his father was of the region of Adarbaijan; his 
mother, whose name was Dughdu, came from the city of Eai.' ^ 

This statement of Shahrastani is apparently vouched for by the 
Dinkart (7. 2. 7-13), from which source we learn that Zoroaster's 
mother before her marriage with Pourushaspa (Portishaspo) resided 
in a different district from the latter. As a girl she becomes filled 
with a divine splendor and glory ; the phenomenon causes her to be 
suspected of witchcraft, and her father is induced by idolatrous 
priests to send her from his home. She goes to Patiragtaraspo, 
'father of a family in the country of the Spitamas, in the district of 
Alak (or Arak),'^ where she marries Pourushaspa the son. This 
district is probably connected with the ' Arag province ' (Zsp. 20. 4), 
which latter is undoubtedly a part of Adarbaijan.* Purthermore, 
by way of localization, we note that the village of Patiragtaraspo is 
stated to have been situated in a valley (Dk. 7. 2. 11-13) ; and the 
house of the son Pourushaspa, Zoroaster's father, is elsewhere spoken 
of as occupying the bank of the river Darej, which may have been 
the home of the Prophet's parents after they married.' 

Lastly, by way of introduction, it must be noticed that there is an 
old proverb in Pahlavi literature which characterizes anything that 
is preposterous as something that could hardly happen ' even if Eak 
(or Eagh) and ISTotar should come together ' (Dk. 7. 2. 51 ; 7. 3. 19 ; 
Zsp. 16. 11-13, and cf. Dk. 7. 3. 39). In Zsp. 16. 12-13, these proper 
names, Eagh and Notar, are explained as ' two provinces which are 
in Atur-patakan (Adarbaijan), such as are at sixty leagues (para- 

1 See my article in JA08. xv. 228. xlvii. 151, n. ; and, slightly differently, 

2 See tMO>S. XV. 228, and of. Hyde, Darmesteter, Le ZA. iii. Introd. p. 
Hist. Beligionis vet. Pers. p. 298 ; Gott- 89, n. 2. "West writes me, Nov. 1, 1897 
heil, Beferences to Zoroaster, p. 48 Eagh = Kak = Arak = Alak = Av, 
(Ms) ; Darmesteter, SBE.iv. (2ded.), Eagha. 

p. 261, Le ZA. iii. 35, n. and Introd. p. 6 Bd. go. 32 ; 24. 15 ; Zsp. 22. 12 

89, ii. 2. See also p. 17 above and p. 199. Vd. 19. 4 ; 19. 11. Shahrastani speaks 

s Quotation from Dk. 7. 2. 9 (West's of a mountain (7sm)Mwi2:-xa)' (read- 
translation, SBE. xlvii. 20). ing?), in Adarbaijan, associated with 

* On ' Arag,' consult West, SBE. Zoroaster's birth. 


sang, i.e. 210 to 240 miles) from Cist ; ' Zaratusht arose from Eagh, 
and Vishtasp from ISTotar. And of these two provinces, Ragh was 
according to the name of ErioS, son of Duresrobo, son of Maniish- 
cihar, from whom arose the race of Zaratusht; and Notar was 
according to the name of Notar, son of Mantishcihar, from whom 
arose the race of Vishtasp.'^ 

So much by way of introduction. We may now proceed to dis- 
cuss Adarbaijan (Atropatene) and Media (Media Rhagiana) respec- 

1. Adarbaijan (Atropatene) 

The connection of Zoroaster with Lake Caecista, Urumiah, Shiz, 
and the territory round about, may be further illustrated by quota- 
tions in Zoroastrian literature. 

a. Allusions in Zokoasteian Literattikb 

The allusions to Adarbaijan will first be presented, and then an 
attempt will be made to localize, if possible, the region known in 
the Avesta as Airyana Vaejah (Phi. Airan-Vej), and the river called 
Darej or Daraja. 

(a) The Bundahishn places the home of Zoroaster in Airan Vej, 
by the river Daraja. Bd. 20. 32, Daraja rutpavan Airan Vej, munaS 
man-i Porusaspo abUar-l ZaratuSt pavan bar yehevunt, 'the Daraja 
river is in Airan Vej, on whose bank (6a)') was the abode of 
Portishasp, the father of Zaratusht.'^ 

(b) The Bundahishn, in another passage, also states that Zoro- 
aster was born near the Daraja Eiver. Bd. 24. 15, Daraja rut rut- 
bardn rat, mamanaS man-i abitar-i ZaratuSt pavan balx;* ZaratuSt 
tamman zat, ' the Daraja Eiver is the chief of exalted rivers, for the 
abode of Zarattisht's father was upon its banks ; and Zaratusht was 
born there.' 

1 If we assume that Cist (Av. Cag- SBE. slyii. 146-147) . In the Avesta, 
cista) is Lake Urumiah, then ' 60 para- Vishtaspa is of the family of Naotair- 
sangs ' (210-240 miles) would place yans, and so also is Hutaosa his wife. 
Eagh and N5tar considerably outside Cf. Yt. 5. 98 ; 15. 35 and SEE. xlvii. 80, 
of the boundaries of the present Adar- n. 1 and p. 70 above. 

baijan. So noticed by "West (personal " See also West, SEE. v. 82, and p. 

letter, dated Nov. 1, 1897) . This would 204 below. 

favor the common identification of * To be emended ; see the remarks 

Eagh, the home of Zoroaster's mother, on the reading of the word by "West, 

with the ruins of Eai. SEE. v. 89, n. 6. 

2 Zsp. 16. 11-12 ("West's translation, 



(c) Zat-sparam, 22. 12, makes one of Zoroaster's conferences with 
the archangels to have taken place ' on the precipitous bank of the 
Dareja' (pavan Darejin zbar). See West, SBE. xlvii. 162 n. There 
can be little doubt that this assertion, like the unequivocal state- 
ments of the Bundahishn, rests upon good old tradition ; the three 
allusions accord perfectly with hints which are found in the Avesta 

(d) In the Avesta, Vd. 19. 4 ; 19. 11, we likewise learn that Zoro- 
aster's temptations by Ahriman, as well as his visions of Ormazd 
and the archangels, took place, in part at least, upon the banks of 
the river Darej, where stood the house of his father Pourushaspa : 
Vd. 19. 4, Drdjya paiti zharalii nmanahe Pourushaspahe, 'by the 
Darej, upon its high bank, at the home Qoc. gen.) of Pourushaspa.' 
Compare Phi. pavan Darejin zbar in the preceding paragraph. A 
little farther on in the same chapter we read : Vd. 19. 11, psrasai 
ZaraOustro Ahurdm Mazd^m, . . . Drdjya paiti zbarahe, Ahurai Maz- 
dai vanhave, VbhvrMaite Anhano, ASdi ValiiStai, 'Ksa$rdi Vairydi, 
Spantayai Armatse, ' Zoroaster communed with Ahura Mazda on the 
high bank of the Darej, sitting (?) before the good Ahura Mazda, 
and before Good Thought, before Asha Vahishta, Khshathra Vairya, 
and Spenta Armaiti.' ^ 

With regard to localizations, there is good ground for believing 
that Airan Vej (A v. Airyana Vaejah) is to be identified in part at 
least with Adarbaijan, and that the ancient Darej of the Avesta 
(Phi. Daraja) is identical with the modern Daryai. The Daryai 
Eud flows from Mt. Savalan (Sebilan), in Adarbaijan, northward 
into the Aras (Araxes).^ If the identification be correct and the 

1 The reference to the elevation or rahi, 'at a bend' (of the river), or as 

the precipitous hank of the river, Av. adj. ' meandering ' ; of. Skt. V ^^"""i 

zbarah, Phi. zbar, bar (of. Skt. hv&ras) , ' to he crooked, to wind ' ; or even the 

seems to he in accordance with the idea ' in a cave ' might he gotten ety- 

tradition that Zoroaster retired to a mologically from the word ; and the 

mountain for meditation ; see Vd. 22. cave played a part in Zoroastrian and 

19, gairlm avi sp9nto-frasnS., var9Sdm Mithraic mysteries. On the latter point 

avi spdnto-frasnS,, ' to the mountain of compare Windisohmann, Mithra, pp. 

the two who held holy converse ; to 62-64, in Abh. K. Morg. 1. No. 1, 1857. 
the wood where the two (Ormazd and " See also Darmesteter, Zend-Avesta 

Zoroaster) had holy communings.' tr. SBE. iv. Introd. p. 49 (1st ed.). 

See similar ideas above, p. 34. If it For the river Aras (Araxes), see 

were not for the Pahlavi passages, one de Harlez, Avesta traduit, p. viii. map ; 

might be inclined to render Av. zba- also the map of Persia by Philip 


ancient Darej, Daraja, was in Atropatene, it is wliolly in keeping 
with what follows ; for in this connection may be noticed a later 
non-Iranian tradition which associates Zoroaster's name with Shiz 
(cf. Av. Caecista) and with Mt. Savalan. Consult the Map. 

This tradition which supports the assumed identification Darej, 
Daraja, Daryai, is found in the Arabic writer Kazwinl (about a.d. 
1263).' The passage in which KazwInI speaks of Shiz in Adar- 
baijan is as follows : ' Zaradusht, the prophet of the Magians, takes 
his origin from here {i.e. Adarbaijan). It is said that he came from 
Shiz. He went to the mountain Sabalan, separated from men. He 
brought a book the name of which was Basta. It was written in 
Persian, which could not be understood except with the assistance of 
a commentator. He appeared, claiming the gift of prophecy, at the 
time of Gushtasp, the son of Lohrasp, the son of Kai-Khusrau, king 
of Persia.'^ Mount Sabalan (Savalan) may be the Avestan 'Mount 
of the Holy Communicants,' with a sacred tree perhaps (Vd. 22. 19, 
gainm spdnto-frasnd, vardhm spanto-frasnd), for Kazwini elsewhere 
says of Sabalan : ' It is related that the Prophet (i.e. Mohammed) 
said: Sabalan is a mountain between Armenia and Adarbaijan. 
On it is one of the graves of the prophets. He said further : On 
the top of the mountain is a large spring, the water of which is 
frozen on account of the severe cold ; and around the mountain are 
hot springs to which sick people come. At the foot of the mountain 
is a large tree, and under this there is a plant to which no animal 
will draw near. If it comes near it, the animal flees away ; if it eat of 
it, it dies.' ' The religious character of the place, the mountain, the 
tree, the springs, would answer well for the identification suggested 
for the modern Daryai Eud in Adarbaijan. 

This much having been prefaced with reference to Adarbaijan 
and with regard to the river near which the Prophet probably 
passed some of his early years, or in the neighborhood of which he 

& Son (London), Eand & McNally where Eawlinson's identification of 

(New York) , and especially by Keith Shiz with Takht-i Suleiman is 

Johnson (Edinburgh and London) at noticed, 
the end of this volume. ^ Gottheil, Beferences to Zoroaster, 

1 Kazwini, ii. p. 267, ed. "Wtisten- p. 40. 
feld, Gottingen, 1848 (Gottheil, Refer- ' Gottheil, Beferences to Zoroaster, 

ences to Zoroaster, p. 40) ; consult pp. 41-42. According to Gottheil, the 

also Darmesteter, Zend-Avesta, tr. tree appears also in connection with 

8BE. iv. Introd. p. 49 (1st ed.), Zoroaster in Syriac legends. 


may have been born (Bd. 24. 15), if not at Urumiah, we are next 
prepared to take up the question of Airan Vej. 

Direct Iranian tradition explicitly connects the opening of Zoro- 
aster's prophetic career with Airyana Vaejah of the Avesta, or Airan 
Vej in Pahlavi. This land is sometimes regarded as mythical ; but, 
like a number of other scholars, I do not agree with that view. I 
am inclined strongly to favor the opinion of those who think we 
have good reason for believing that Airyana Vaejah is to be localized 
in the west of Iran, as the Pahlavi locates it, and that this also 
points to the notion that Zoroaster originally came from that 
direction eastward. The Bundahishn expressly connects Airan Vej 
with Atropatene : Bd. 29. 12, Airan Vej pavan kust-l Aturpatakan. 
The present opinion of scholars tends to uphold this localization.^ 
The river Darej, near which stood the house of Zoroaster's father, 
was in Airan Vej, as already stated, and an identification was accord- 
ingly suggested. In the Avesta, moreover, Zoroaster is familiarly 
spoken of as ' renowned in Airyana Vaejah' (Ys. 9. 14, sruto airyene 
vaejahe). The Prophet is also there represented as offering sacrifice 
in Airyana Vaejah by the river Daitya (see below) : Yt. 6. 104 ; 9. 
25 ; 17. 45, airyene vaejahi vanhuya, daityaya. The Bundahishn 
likewise alludes to the fact that Zoroaster first offered worship in 
Airan Vej and received Metyomah (Av. MaiSydi-mdwJia) as his first 
disciple. The passage reads, Bd. 32. 3, ' Zaratusht, when he brought 
the religion, first celebrated worship in Airan Vej and Metyomah 
received the religion from him.' ' In the Dinkart also, as well as in 
the Avesta, the river Daiti and its af&uents in the land of Airan Vej 
form the scene of Zoroaster's first revelation and of certainly one of 
his interviews with the archangels, the majority of which took place 
in Atropatene ( Dk. 7. 3. 51-64; 4. 29; 8. 60; 9. 23; Zsp. 21. 5; 21. 
13 ; 22. 2 ; 22. 9).' In the later Persian Zartusht Namah, Zoroaster 
passes the Daiti before he proceeds on his mission to King Vishtasp.* 

1 Darmesteter, Le ZA. ii. 5-6 ; Geld- Fhil. ii. 389. Spiegel notices the ques- 

ner, Grundr. d. iran. Phil. ii. 38 ; simi- tion of Airyanem Vaej5 in ZDMG. 

larly Justi, Spiegel, and de Harlez xli. 289. 

make Media the home of the Avesta. ^ cf_ 'West, SBE. v. 141, and Justi, 

The strongest opponent of this view, Der Sundahesh, p. 79. 
and warmest supporter of Baotria, is ^ Cf. p. 40 seq., above. 

Geiger, Ostiranische Eultur, Erlangen, * See Eastwick's translation in Wil- 

1882 ; 8itz. d. Kgl. bayr. Akad., Mai, son, Parsi Religion, p. 491. 
1884, and recently Grundr. d. iran. 


The hallowed Daitya' — a sort of Iranian Jordan — was perhaps 
a border stream between two territorial divisions; we recall that 
Vishtaspa sacrifices 'on the other side of it' {ci. pasne, Yt. 17. 49) 
as discussed elsewhere, p. 211. The proposed identification of the 
Daitya and its affluents, with the modern Kizel Uzen, Sped or Safed 
Eud and its tributaries in Adarbaijan has already been mentioned 
as satisfying most of the conditions of the problem.^ 

/S. Allusions in Mohammedan Whiters 

Having examined the direct Iranian sources in the light of pos- 
sible allusions to Atropatene, we may now turn to other material on 
the subject. Mohammedan writers are almost unanimous in placing 
the first part of Zoroaster's prophetic career in Adarbaijan (Azar- 
baijan) or in stating that he came originally from that region.^ The 
traditions cluster about Urumiah (Urmi) and Shiz. The Arabic 
name Shiz is the counterpart of an Iranian Ciz (from Caecista), or 
Lake Urumiah.^ The Arab geographer Yakut (a.d. 1260) describes 
'Shiz, a district of Azarbaijan . . . which is believed to be the 
country of Zaradusht, the prophet of the fire-worshippers. The 
chief place of this district is Urmiah';^ and under Urmiah he 
writes : ' It is believed that this is the city of Zaradusht and that 
it was founded by the fire-worshippers.' « 

There are a dozen other such statements which will be given 
below, but before presenting them it will be well merely to note that 
two or three Arabic authors allude to Zoroaster as being of Pales- 
tinian origin, and they state that he came from that land to Adar- 
baijan; and they proceed to identify him with Baruch, the scribe of 
Jeremiah. This confusion is presumably due to their having con- 
founded the Arabic form of the name Jeremiah, Armiah {gjjeM 

1 Lit. the ' river of tlie Law,' on Gottheil, References to Zoroaster in 
whioli it was first promulgated. Syriac and Arabia Literature, Drisler 

2 See pp. 41, 211. Tlie same sugges- Classical Studies, New York, 1894 
tion has been made tentatively by (Columbia University Press). 

West, 8BE. v. 79 n. ; but Justi, Odr. * See Darmesteter, Le ZA. iii. p. 

d. iran. Phil. ii. 402, proposes either xxi, n. 2, and cf. Justi, Handbuch, s.v. 

the Kur or the Aras. Similarly Dar- Caecasta. 

mesteter, Le ZA. ii. 6, n. ' See Barbier de Meynard, Diet, de 

8 The quotations in the following la Perse, extrait de Taqout, Paris, 

paragraphs are made from the mono- 1861, p. 367. 
graph of my friend and colleague, " Ibid. p. 26, 85. 


■with Zoroaster's supposed native place Urumiah, Urmiah (xjyoj).^ 
Having noticed this point we may present the Arabic and Syriac 
allusions to Zoroaster's native place, which are almost unanimous in 
mentioning Adarbaijan (Azarbaijau). 

(a) Ibn Khurdadhbah (about a.d. 816),^ Kitab alrMasalik wa'lr 
Mamalik, p. 119 (ed. De Goeje, Leyden, 1889) writes of 'Urmiah, 
the city of Zaradusht, and Salamas and Shiz, in which last city 
there is the temple of Adharjushnas, which is held in high esteem 
by the Magians.' ^ 

(b) Ahmad ibn Yahya al-Baladhuri (about a.d. 851) in his Kitab 
Futuh al-buldan (De Goeje, Liber Expugnationis Regnorum, p. 331. 
1, Leyden, 1866), in mentioning the conquest of Adarbaijan, adds the 
following note: 'Urmiah is an ancient city (of Adarbaijan); the 
Magians think that Zaradusht, their master, came from there.' * 

(c) Ibn al-Paklh al-HamadhanI (about a.d. 910), in his geo- 
graphical account (ed. De Goeje, Leyden, 1885, p. 286) mentions as 
cities of Adarbaijan: 'Janzah, Jabrawan, and Urmiah, the city of 
Zaradusht, and Shiz, in which there is the fire-temple, Adhar- 
jushnas, which is held in high esteem by the Magians.' ° 

(d) Tabarl (d. a.d. 923), in his history, gives considerable atten- 
tion to Zoroaster ; out of a number of allusions one passage may be 
selected. It will be noticed, as explained above, pp. 38, 166, that 
Tabari mentions a belief that Zoroaster was a native of Palestine 
who came to Adarbaijan. In his Annales, Part I. p. 648 (Brill, 
Leyden, 1881), the passage runs: 'During the reign of Bishtasp 
(Vishtasp) Zaradusht appeared, whom the Magians believe to be 
their prophet. According to some learned men among the people of 
the book (i.e. the Jews), he was of Palestinian origin, a servant 
to one of the disciples of Jeremiah the prophet, with whom he was 
a favorite ; but he proved treacherous and false to him. Wherefore 

1 Cf. pp. 30, 166 above and Gottheil, in the Christian patriarch Eutychius 
References to Zoroaster, p. 30, n. 2. of Alexandria (a.d. 876-939) when he 

2 His father is stated to have been mentions Zoroaster. This author wrote 
a Magian, Gottheil, References to Zoro- in Arabic ; the passage is given above 
aster, p. 44. in a Latin version in Appendix II. p. 

" Gottheil, Eeferences to Zoroaster, 168, and it may be found rendered into 

p. 44. Latin in Migne, Patrolog. dr., torn. 111. 

* Gottheil, References to Zoroaster, ^ Gottheil, References to Zoroaster, 

p. 33. It is not necessary at this point p. 44. 
to repeat also the allusion to ' Persia ' 


God cursed him, and he became leprous.* He wandered to Adar- 
baijan, and preached there the Magian religion. From there he went 
to Bishtasp, who was in Balkh. Now when he (Zoroaster) had 
come before him and preached his doctrine to him, it caused him to 
marvel, and he compelled his people to accept it, and put many of 
his people to death on its account. They then followed it (the 
religion). Bishtasp reigned one hundred and twelve years.' ' 

(e) Mastidl (writing a.d. 943-944, died 961) states in his Meadows 
of Gold : ' Gushtasp reigned after his father (Lohrasp) and resided 
at Balkh. He had been on the throne thirty years when Zardusht, 
son of Espiman, presented himself before him ... he (Zardusht) 
was originally from Adarbaijan and he is ordinarily called Zardusht, 
son of Espiman.' ^ 

(f) Hamzah al-Isfahani (a.d. eleventh century) in his Annals, p. 22, 
26 (Gottwaldt, Hamzae Ispahanensis Annalium, Libri x, Lipsiae, 
1848) states : ' While King Lohrasp was still living, the sovereignty 
was handed over to his son Gushtasp ; and in the thirtieth year of 
Gushtasp's reign, when he himself was fifty years old, Zardusht 
of Adarbaijan came to him and expounded the religion to him. 
He not only embraced the religion himself, but he also sent messen- 
gers to the Greeks in behalf of this faith and invited them to 
adopt it. They, on the contrary, produced a book which had been 
given them by Feridtin, in which it was agreed that they should be 
allowed to keep whatsoever religion they had themselves chosen.' * 

(g) Shahrastani (born a.d. 1086) has the famous statement already 
noticed, pp. 17, 192 : ' They (the Zaradushtiya) are the followers of 
Zaradusht ibn Burshasb (Purshasp), who appeared in the time of 
King Kushtasf (Gushtasp) ibn Lohrasp ; his father was from Adar- 
baijan, and his mother, whose name was Dughdu, was from Eai.' ' 
According to Shahrastani the Prophet's birth takes place in 

(h) Ibn al-Athir (a.d. 13th century) incorporates the greater part 
of Tabarl's history into his Kitdb al-Kamil fi al-ta'arilch, with slight 

1 Cf. p. 30 and Appendix II. p. 166. * After Gottwaldt' s Latin transla- 

2 Gottheil, Meferences to Zoroaster, tion. See also Gottheil, References to 
pp. 36-37. Zoroaster, p. 33. 

3 From MasQdi (Magoudi), Prairies ^ From the German translation by 
d' Or, Texte et traduction par Barbier Haarbrticker, i. p. 275 seq. ; see Got- 
de Meynard, ii. p. 123. See Gottheil, theil, Meferences to Zoroaster, p. 48. 
Beferences to Zoroaster, p. 34. 


additions from other sources, and -witli a more concise arrangement. 
His account of Zoroaster closely follows Tabari's lines, including 
the statement regarding Zoroaster's relation to Jeremiah,^ and his 
wandering to Adarbaijan: 'It is said, he adds, that he was a for- 
eigner,^ and that he had composed a book with which he went 
around in the land. No one knew its meaning. He pretended that 
it was a heavenly tongue in which he was addressed. He called it 
Ashta.^ He went from Adarbaijan to Paris (Persia). But no one 
understood what was in it, nor did they receive him. Then he went 
to India and offered it to the princes there. Then he went to China 
and to the Turks, but not one of them would receive him. They 
drove him out from their country. He travelled to Ferghanah, but 
its prince wished to kill him. Erom there he fled and came to 
Bishtasp (Vishtasp), son of Lohrasp, who commanded that he be 
imprisoned. He suffered imprisonment for some time.' * And Ibn 
al-Athir farther on relates : ' Then Bishtasp caused Zaradusht, who 
was in Balkh, to be brought to him. When he stood before the 
king he explained his religion to him. The king wondered at it, 
followed it, and compelled his people to do the same. He killed 
a large number of them until they accepted (the new religion). The 
Magians believe that he took his rise in Adarbaijan and that 
he came down to the king through the roof of the chamber. In his 
hand was a cube of fire with which he played without its hurting 
him; nor did it burn any one who took it from his hands. He 
caused the king to follow him and to hold to his religion, and to 
build temples in his land for the fires. From this they lighted the 
fire in the fire-temples.' ' 

(i) Yakut (about a.d. 1250) has already been cited, but the allu- 
sions from Gottheil's collection (p. 42) are added here for complete- 
ness. The Kitab Mu'jam alrbuldan (vol. iii. p. 364, ed. Wiistenfeld) 
remarks of Shiz: 'It is said that Zaradusht, the prophet of the 
Magians, comes from this place. Its chief city is Urmiah. ... In 
it is a fire-temple which is held in great esteem. From it are lighted 
the fires of the Magians from the east unto the west.* Also, vol. i. 

1 See comment on pp. 197-198. is implied in the Dlnkart ; the impris- 

2 Min al-'ajam ; probably a Persian onment is also familiar from the sto- 
(Gottheil). ries in the Dlnkart and Zartusht 

' Mistake for Abasta, Avesta. Namah, p. 62 above. 

* The notion of Zoroaster's wan- s Gottheil, References to Zoroaster, 

derings is not inconsistent with what pp. 39-40. 


p. 219, Yakut has : ' Urmiah . . . people believe it to be tlie city of 
Zaradusht, the prophet of the Magians.' * 

(j) Kazwini (about a.d. 1263), Cosmography, ii. p. 267 (ed. Wus- 
tenfeld, Gottingen, 1848), speaking of Shiz in. Adarbaijan, recounts : 
' Zaradusht, the prophet of the Magians, takes his origin from here. 
It is said that he came from Shiz. He went to the mountain Saba- 
lan, separated from men. He brought a book the name of which 
was Basta. It was written in Persian which could not be under- 
stood except with the assistance of a commentator. He appeared, 
claiming the gift of prophecy, at the time of Kushtasp, the son of 
Lohrasp, the son of Kai Khusrau, king of the Persians. He wished 
to get to Bishtasp, but he did not succeed. Bishtasp was sitting in 
the hall of state, when the roof of the hall parted in two, and Zara- 
dusht came down from it.' And, after describing some of the details 
of Vishtasp's conversion, Kazwini concludes : ' Zaradusht commanded 
that fire-temples should be built in all the kingdom of Bishtasp. He 
made the fire a Kibla, not a god. This sect continued to exist until 
the prophet of God (Mohammed) was sent. They say that even 
to-day a remnant of it is to be found in the land of Sajistan.' ' 

(k) The Syriac writer, Gregorius Bar "Ebhraya (about a.d. 1250) 
in his Ardbic Chronicon, p. 83 (ed. Salhani, Beirut, 1890), following 
his Arab masters, says : ' In those days (of Cyrus and Cambyses) 
Zaradosht, chief of the Magian sect, by birth of Adarbaijan, or, 
as some say, of Athor (Assyria). It is reported that he was one of 
Elijah's disciples, and he informed the Persians of the sign of the 
birth of Christ, and that they should bring him gifts." 

(1) Abulfeda (a.d. 1273-1331), Annals, vol. iii. p. 58, as cited by 
Hyde, states that Zoroaster arose in ( -*st) Urmi or (itjyovl) Urmiah. 

See Hyde, Hist. Relig. vet. Pers. p. 311 (1st ed.). Hyde discusses 
other Arabic references, pp. 312-317. See below. Appendix VI. § 2. 
Estimate of the Mohammedan Allusions. — According to the Arabic 
statements one would be justified in assuming that Zoroaster arose 
in Adarbaijan; there seems also to be a preponderance of state- 
ments to the effect that Balkh was the scene of the Prophet's con- 
version of Vishtasp. 

1 Gottheil, Beferences to Zoroaster, * Gottheil, Beferences to Zoroaster, 
p. 42. p. 32. 

2 Gottheil, Beferences to Zoroaster, 
pp. 40-41. 


2. Ragha, Rai (Media Rhagiana) 

All the above traditional Oriental allusions have been unanimous 
in placing Zoroaster's origin in Adarbaijan, or Media Atropatene, 
whether in Urumiah, Shiz, or on the river Darej. There are yet 
two other passages, drawn from the Avesta, which connect Zoroas- 
ter's name with Eagha. 

Eagha is generally identified with the city of Eai (Gk. "Payat) of 
Media, whose ancient ruins are still pointed out near modern Tehe- 
ran. This was a famous city in antiquity, the ' Eages of Media ' in 
the 0. T. Apocrypha.^ The Pahlavi texts seem to regard it as part 
of Atur-patakan.^ Perhaps the boundaries of Adarbaijan were 
wider extended then than now, although Darmesteter suggests that 
possibly there may have been a Eagha in Adarbaijan independent 
of Eai.^ This seems hardly necessary from what follows. We 
must also remember that Eaga in the Ancient Persian inscriptions 
is a district or province, dahyu. The subject of Eagha requires 
further discussion, but it may be stated at the outset that these 
allusions, in any event, lend additional weight to the view of Zo- 
roaster's belonging originally to western Iran. 

But before taking up the detailed question of Av. Ragha, Phi. 
Ragh, Mod. Pers. Rai, it will be well to cite an extract from the 
Dabistan, a work that is late in its present form (about a.d. 1650), 
but a book which contains old traditions. The passage runs : ' It is 
generally reported that Zardusht was of Adarbaijan or Tabriz ; but 
those who are not BeJi-dinians, or " true believers," assert, and the 
writer of this work has also heard from the Mobed Torru of Busa- 
wari, in Gujarat, that the birthplace and distinguished ancestors of 
the prophet belong to the city of Eai.' * With this information we 
may turn to the Avesta itself. 

(a) The first of the two Avesta texts which evidently associate 
Zoroaster's name in some way with Eagha is Vd. 1. 16, and the Pah- 
lavi version of the passage is interesting. The Avesta passage 
reads : Vd. 1. 15, dvadasdm asawhg,mca Sdi6ranamca valiiUdm frad- 

1 On ' Rhagae,' see my article in * Dabistan, tr. Shea and Troyer, i. 

Harper's Diet, of Classical Antiqui- p. 263, Paris, 1843. The translator 

ties, pp. 1369-1370, New York, 1897. adds a note that Rai is the most north- 

'^ E.g. Zsp. 16. 12, West, 8BE. ern town of the province Jebal, or 

xlvii. 147, et al. Irali Ajem, the country of the ancient 

s ie ZA. ii. 13, n., 33. Parthians. 


warasdm azam yd ahuro mazdd ray^m 6rizantum, ' as the twelfth, most 
excellent of localities and places, I who am Ahura Mazda created 
Eagha of the three races.' The Pahlavi commentary renders, rale 1 3 
toxmak atur-patakano, 'Eak of three races, of Attir-patakan,' ^ and 
he adds the gloss, aetun mun rei yemaleluneto, ' some say it is Eai.' 
Notice the footnote.^ 

(b) The second of the Avestan passages which connects the name 
of Zoroaster with Eagha is in Ys. 19. 18. Mention is there made of 
five regular rulers, 'the lord of the house, the village, the province, 
and the country, and Zarathushtra as the fifth.' This order, as the 
text continues, holds good for all countries ' except the Zarathush- 
trian Raji (or Baghi ; is it Rai ?).' ' The Zarathushtrian Eagha 
{Raya ZaraduStriS) has four lords, the lord of the house, the village, 
the province, and Zarathushtra as the fourth.' The text is 

Ys. 19. 18, Kaya ratavo ? nmanyo visyo zantumo daKyumo zaror 
OuStro puxSo. u79h^m daKyun^m yd anyd rajoit zaraduStroit. 
caOru-ratuS raya zaraOuStris. kaya ai'Ahd ratavo f nmanyasca 
visyasoa zantumasca zaraOustro tuiryo. This construction evi- 
dently signifies that the Dahyuma, or governor, is everywhere the 
supreme head, but there is acknowledged one who stands above him 
as representative of the church, as well as state, the chief pontiff 
Zoroaster (Zarathushtra), or 'the supreme Zoroaster' (Zarathushtro- 
tema), as he is elsewhere termed (e.g. Ys. 26. 1; Yt. 10. 115, etc.). 
In the papal see of Eagha, however, the temporal power (Dahyuma) 
and the spiritual lordship (Zarathushtra) are united in the one 
person.^ For some reason Eagha is plainly the seat of the religious 
government. The Pahlavi version (ad loc.) speaks of it in connec- 
tion with Zoroaster as being ' his own district ' (mata-i nafSman) ; * 
the Sanskrit of Neryosang glosses the allusion by asserting that 

1 Cf. Darab D. P. Sanjana, Pahlavi ^ See also Darmesteter, Le ZA. i. 
Version of the Avesta Vendidad, p. 8, p. 170. 

Bombay, 1895. * Notice the use of ' district,' and 

2 Allusion has been made above elsewhere Ragha is a region as well as 
(p. 202) to the question of a Kagha in a town of Media. On Greek allusions 
Adarbaijan as possibly contrasted with to "Pdyai, see also Haug, Ahuna- Vai- 
the 'Pti7ai of the Greek, or possibly to rya-Formel, pp. 133-134 (=45-46), 
a, Haya ZaraBuHris diSerenttiorn'Rai; Miinchen, 1872, and the article which 
cf. also the Ano. Pers. Magd as a dis- is referred to on the preceding page 
trict or province, dahyu; but that is (p. 202, n. 1). 


204 APPENDIX 17 

Zoroaster was the fourth lord in this village, because it is his own 
— tasmin grame yat sviyam dsit asau gurus' caturtho 'hliut} Eagha 
is plainly a centre of ecclesiastical power, as remarked above. This 
fact is further attested by Yakut (i. p. 244), who says there was a 
celebrated fortress ' in the district of Dunbawand, in the province of 
Eai ' (notice the latter expression), which was the stronghold of the 
chief priest of the Magians.^ If Eagha enjoyed such religious prom- 
inence there must have been groimd for it, and we recall what was 
said above, in the Dabistan and Shahrastani's statement, which con- 
nects Zoroaster's mother's family with Eai. 

(c) As a sequel to this, comes an interesting comment in the 
Selections of Zat-sparam ; this has already been noticed (p. 192), but 
it is worthy of being taken up again at this point, for it is a sort of 
Iranian adage like Macbeth's Birnam wood and Dunsinane. In Zsp. 
16. 11-12, an old proverbial affirmation is used to assert that some- 
thing is impossible, and that it would not happen — 'not though 
both the provinces of Eagh and IsTotar should arrive here together'; 
and the explanatory comment on these proper names is added, ' two 
provinces which are in Atur-patakan, such as are sixty leagues 
(par a sang, i.e. 210 to 240 miles) from Cist.^ Zaratusht arose 
from Eagh, and Vishtasp from Notar.' The rest of the passage 
and the Dinkart occurrences of the proverb have been given above 
(pp. 192-193), and should be consulted. 

Eagh (Av. Eagha) like Arabic Shiz is evidently a territorial 
designation as well as a town title, and certainly the Prophet's 
family on the maternal side came from there, if we are to place any 
reliance on tradition. Now, if the Prophet was born in a city of 
Adarbaijan, whether in Urumiah, in the region of Shiz (Av. Caecista, 
prob. Urumiah), or on the Darej Eiver — and even Eagh itself appears 
frequently in Pahlavi to have been regarded as a part of this land — 
it is by no means unlikely that a man with a mission like Zoroaster 
would have been drawn to so important a place as Eagha was in 
antiquity, especially if it was the home of his mother. All which 
would account for the association of the names together. An attempt 
has been made by the present writer, in JAOS. xv. p. 228-232, more 
fully to amplify this connection of Eagha with Zoroaster's teaching 

1 Cf. Spiegel, NeriosengVs Skt. Ue- Diet, de la Perse, p. 33 ; Darmesteter, 
bersetz. des Yaqna, Leipzig, 1861, p. 99. 8BE. iv. p. xlviii. (1st ed.). 

2 See Gottheil, References to Zoro- ^ li is important to consult the foot- 
aster, p. 46, n. ; Barbier de Meynard, note on p. 193. 


and preaching, especially by an attempted explanation of the word 
rajis in Ys. 53. 9.^ But the passage and the commentary alike are 
difficult, and enough has been said already to show Zoroaster's con- 
nection with this region. 

Conclusion as to Zoroaster's Native Place. — Zoroaster arose in 
western Iran. Apparently he was born somewhere in Adarbaijan. 
The places specially mentioned are Urumiah, Shiz (At. Caecista, 
prob. anc. Urumiah) and the river Darej. His mother's family was 
connected with Eagha, which accounts for associating his name with 
that place ; but it is not clear that this was the Median Kal ('Pciyat 
of the Greeks) although it was in the west. The latter seems to 
have been a district as well as town, and is sometimes regarded as 
a part of ancient Atur-patakan. Zoroaster's youth was also cer- 
tainly passed in western Iran. 


General Remarks 

The question regarding Zoroaster's native place may be looked 
upon as having been answered by placing it in western Iran, at 
least on the basis of present evidence and opinion. The question 
as to the scene or scenes of his religious activity, however, is 
a more unsettled problem. The uncertainty is doubtless due to the 
conditions of the case ; missionary work by a reformer is not con- 
fiued to a single field. Taking a general view, .however, as stated 
on p. 186, scholars are divided between Media, in the broader sense, 
and Bactria, with a preponderance perhaps in favor of the former. 
The present writer has elsewhere maintained the ground that both 
sides of this question are possibly correct, in part, and that the con- 
flicting views may be combined and reconciled on the theory that 
the reformer's native place was not necessarily the scene of his 
really successful prophetic mission.^ In other words, the opinion 
was held that Zoroaster may have been a prophet without honor in 
his own country ; that he arose, indeed, in western Iran, probably 
somewhere in Atropatene ; that he presumably went at one time to 

1 First suggested by Geldner, KZ. ^ Jackson, Where was Zoroaster^s 

xxviii. 202-203, and further discussed Native Place ? JAOS. vol. xv. pp. 

by the present writer in the article 221-232, New Haven, 1891. 
alluded to in the next note. 


Eagha (perhaps Media Rhagiana), but on finding this an unfruitful 
field he turned at last to Bactria. Under the patronage of Vishtaspa, 
his faith became an organized state religion; and then it spread, 
possibly through religious crusades, westward to Media and Persia. 
Progress was rapid; the fire of religious zeal was contagious; the dis- 
trict of Eagha, which was once a hot-bed of heresy (uparo-vimanohim), 
became the head of the established faith of Media. Persia follows 
suit when she rises into power. That at least was suggested at the 
time — in other words that we have an earlier instance of the same 
story as Mohammed, or Mecca and Medina. 

Such a view, however, is mere theory or speculation, at least so far 
as Bactria and the exact spreading of the Creed is concerned. Never- 
theless it is not speculation built entirely upon baseless fabric. It 
has this in its favor, that it is based upon a combination of various 
statements in Zoroastrian literature which may be united with Arabic 
and Syriac material, and with Latin and Greek references, so as to 
make, in part at least, a fairly solid structure. The assumption of a 
double scene for Zoroaster's life, first for his birth and earlier years, 
and second for his later years and death, has also been inferred by 
others, naturally from the tradition.^ It has an advantage in saving 
several points of tradition which would otherwise fall ; but it is open 
to several serious objections which will be pointed out as the investi- 
gation proceeds. Por the present, it will be a better plan simply to 
bring forward both sides of the question, the eastern and the western 
view, and to reserve final decision for later. The Bactrian side will 
first be presented; the arguments in favor of Media will then be 
arrayed to offset this. 

Before proceeding to the discussion, it is proper to recall that we 
have no direct evidence to prove that Zoroaster spent the first thirty 
years of his life anywhere but in his native land, if we assume that 
to be Adarbaijan. At the age of thirty came the Revelation, the 
opening of his ministry, and the first of the seven visions that filled 
the ten or twelve years which elapsed until Maidhyoi-maonha adopted 
the creed, and King Vishtaspa was converted. The whole of this 
question has been examined in Chapter IV. As it was there stated 

^ So Anquetil du Perron, Zend- view (but witli modification), Spiegel, 

Avesta, T. i. pt. 2, pp. 5, 29. (An- Eran. AUertumsk. i. 708, ii. 171. On 

quetil's Mem. de VAcad. des Bel. Lett. the other hand, notice wliat is said by 

T. xxxi. p. 370 seq. , as noted also by Geiger, OIK. pp. 488-492. 
Kanga, Extracts, p. 55.) A similar 


we have information from the Dinkart (see pp. 43-46 above), that 
Zoroaster went and preached before the Turanian AurvaitSrdang 
after the first conference with Ormazd ; furthermore, that he ex- 
pounded the tenets of his faith to Parshat-gau in Sagastan. From 
this it is manifest that during the first two years he must, at all 
events, have been in the east, apparently both northeast and south- 
east, even if one maintains the view that Vishtaspa lived nearer to 
the region of his own native land. 

This tradition of wanderings to remote lands is in keeping with 
the Gatha psalm of dejection, Kam namoi z^m, TmOra nsmoi ayeni, 
'to what land am I to turn, whither am I to turn,' Ys. 46. 1 seq. 
An echo of it, moreover, as already stated (p. 200), is perhaps to 
be recognized in Ibn al-Athir, who recounts how Zoroaster goes 
from Adarbaijan to Persia, then to India,^ China, Turkestan, 
Ferghanah, and that he finally converts Vishtaspa, who seems in 
this account to be in the east. Perhaps these statements regarding 
India are due to Zoroaster's having been in Sagastan or Seistan (see 
also footnote below) which forms part of the territory of White 
India.^ It may be noticed that Ammianus Marcellinus also makes 
Hystaspes (or is it Zoroaster) pass some time studying in India 
(see Appendix II., p. 167). So much for the two years that fol- 
lowed the first ecstatic vision, and which correspond to different 
scenes in Zoroaster's missionary labors ! 

By the close of this period, Zoroaster appears to have wended his 
way gradually back again toward his native country, as may be 
inferred from the different localities in which the visions of the next 
eight years took place. Consult the Map. The second, third, and 
fourth visions took place on the homeward route to the south of the 
Caspian Sea, if the identifications in Chapter IV. be correct. The 
fifth and sixth visions were beheld in the region of the river Daitya 
and Mount Asnavant (Mount Sahend and the Kizel Uzen ; cf . pp. 41, 
48). Finally, the last interview with the archangels was manifested 
to him at his own home on the river Darej (pp. 34, 49, 194), which 
would agree with the Avesta (Vd. 19. 4, 11), as this vision is also 
associated with the temptation by Ahriman. But now for the Bac- 
trian question ! 

1 Is it Sagastan (Parshat-gau) and ^ On ' White India,' the provinces 

Turan (Ailrvaita-dang) ? Cf . p. 39, n. of Iran which border upon India, see 
1 above. See also next note and Darmesteter, Le ZA. ii. 4, 13, n., and 
references. of. above, pp. 44, n. 4, 72, n. 3, 87, n. 

1, 178, and p. 210. 


1. Bactria and the East, or the View that Zoroaster's Ministry was in 

Eastern Iran 

Irrespective of the question of the scene of Zoroaster's activity, 
the whole problem of the home of the Avesta itself, as a literary- 
composition and religious work, has long been a common subject of 
discussion.^ The assumption of a Bactrian kingdom -which ante- 
dated the Median empire, or at least preceded the rise of the Achae- 
menian power, has generally been maintained by scholars, especially 
by the historian Duncker.^ Criticisms of this view will be men- 
tioned later ; but it is important to notice that one of the strongest 
supporters of an eastern Iranian civilization, judging from geo- 
graphical and ethnographical allusions in the Avesta, is the Iranist, 
Wilhelm Geiger.' 

The Avesta itself does not give any definite statement with 
respect to the situation of Vishtaspa's capital, nor do the Pahlavi 
texts, to be discussed below, seem more explicit. Nevertheless, the 
Avestan geographical allusions tend to gravitate toward the east, 
rather than toward the west.^ The heroic sagas of the royal line of 
kings in the Avestan Yashts are located for the most part in the 
east. According to the Zamyad Yasht (esp. Yt. 19. 66-69), the 
home of the Kavi dynasty is in Seistan, and this is important to con- 
sider because of its bearing on the claim for the east and for Bactria. 
Firdausi, a native of Tus, moreover, places the scene of the Vish- 
taspa-Gushtasp cycle in eastern and northeastern Iran, as will be 
more fully explained below." According to Firdausi (Dakiki), 
Yak-Qt, Mirkhond, and others, Balkh was founded by Vishtasp's 
father, Lohrasp.^ On the Graeco-Bactrian coins is found an 

1 For some biWiographical refer- 292-296 ; of. also in Sybel's Histor. 
enoes, see p. 186. Zeitschr. N. F. 8. 1 seq. Again, it is 

2 Oeschichte des AUerthums. iv. 15 opposed by de Harlez, Das alter und 
seq. ; Noldeke, Persia, in Enoyelopae- Heimath des Avesta, in BB. xii. 109 
dia Britannica, xviii. 561 (9th ed.) ; seq.; of. also Abh. d. Berliner Or. Con- 
Tomasohek, Baktria, Baktriane, Bak- gress, ii. 270-277. The arguments in 
trianoi, in Pauly's Real-Encycl. ii. favor of Bactria from the classics are 
col. 2806 seq. (nene Bearb.). most strongly presented by Rapp, 

8 Ostiranische Kultur, Erlangen, ZDM&. xix. 27-33 (1865). 

1882; Vaterland u. Zeitalter des Avesta * Geldner, Gdr. d. iron. Phil. ii. 38. 

in Sitzb. d. K. B. Acad., May, 1894 ; ^ gee also Noldeke in Gdr. d. iran. 

Grundriss d. iran. Phil. ii. 389. This Phil. ii. 131. 

vie-w is criticised by Spiegel, ZDMG. " Firdausi, Livre des Bois, tr. 

XXXV. 636, and rejected, ZDMG. xli. MoM, iv. 224; Yalitut in Barbier de 


APOOACnO (i.e. Aurvat-aspa, Lohrasp), evidently as heros epony- 
mos of the place.^ Albiruni states that ' Balkh was the original resi- 
dence of the Kayanians,' and Mirkhond speaks of Lohrasp as 'the 
Bactrian.'^ Tabari similarly states that Lohrasp 'established his 
residence at Balkh/ where he places the seat likewise of Lohrasp's 
son and successor, Vishtasp ; ^ yet it must not be forgotten in this 
connection that Tabari also considers Nebuchadnezzar and Cyrus to 
have been generals under Lohrasp and Vishtasp.* Masudi joins in 
regarding Balkh as the royal capital until the seat of government 
was transferred westward to Irak in the time of Humai.' Other 
Persian and Arabic chroniclers and geographers place the seat of 
the Kayanian empire, at the time of Lohrasp and Vishtasp, in Bac- 
tria, i.e. to the north of Seistan, and there is a tradition about a 
portrait of Zoroaster at Balkh, as will be noticed in Appendix VII. 
The author of the Zartusht IS!" amah and the Cangranghacah Nam ah, 
who was himself a native of Eai, localizes the scene of the meeting 
between Zoroaster and Vishtasp in Balkh, where he also represents 
the famous debate between Zoroaster and the Brahman Cangrang- 
hacah to have taken place (cf. p. 86 seq. above). This is interesting 
when we consider that the writer came from the west and from a 
city which was so closely associated with Zoroaster's name; he must 
have had some strong tradition to that effect ; his work, moreover, 
is known to be based upon Pahlavi authorities.^ In the Dinkart, 
the meeting took place first on a ' race-course ' (aspanvar), but the 
locality is not indicated, cf. p. 69, n. 2 above. From the Pahlavi 
treatise ' Wonders of Sagastan ' it appears that at one time (perhaps 
after his conversion) Vishtaspa had conferences with Zoroaster and 
his apostles in Seistan — see passage translated below, p. 212. 

Meynard's Diet, de la Perse, p. 112; duite sur la version persaned'Ahou-Ali 

Mirkhond, Hist, of Fers. Kings, tr. Mo'hammed Bel 'ami, par Zotenberg, i. 

Shea, London, 1832. p. 491 seq. ; of. similar allusions in Gott- 

1 See Tomaschek's article, Baktria, heil, Beferences to Zoroaster, pp.36-40. 
in Pauly's Beal-Encyclopaedie, ii. col. * rurthermore, for the destruction 
2812-2813. Consult Stein, ZoroasJnan of Jerusalem hy Lohrasp (!), see 
Deities on Indo-Scythian Coins in Maiog-I khirat, 27. 64-67, tr. West, 
Babyl. and Or. Record, i. 157 seq. ; 8BE. xxiv. 64-65, and Yakut in Bar- 
notice a dissenting view by Darme- hier de Meynard's Diet, de la Perse, 
steter, Le ZA. ii. 432. p. 369. See also p. 91, n. 2 above. 

2 Albiruni, Chronology, tr. Saohau, ' Magoudi, Les Prairies d' Or, tr. 
p. 100, London, 1879, and Mirkhond, Barbier de Meynard, ii. p. 120. 

tr. Shea, pp. 59, 264, 272. ° Zartusht Ndmah, tr. Eastwick, in 

' Tabari, Chronique de Tabari, tra- Wilson, Parsi Beligion, p. 498. 


To return to Firdausl. As mentioned above, the Shah Namah 
connects Lohrasp with Balkh, and describes how the youthful Vish- 
tasp quits the realm and passes the first years of his life in the 
west, in Bum (the Byzantine Empire).* He returns from thence to 
assume the sceptre of authority. It is not specifically stated that 
the years which directly followed were actually passed in Balkh, 
but it is certain that the last part of his reign is regarded as being 
passed there. Lohrasp himself lives there in retirement after 
Vishtasp had mounted the throne, and the lapse of time is shown 
also by the fact that Zoroaster is now spoken of as an old man 
(Pers. plr).^ Perhaps Vishtasp formed a link between the east and 
the west, if the texts seem to imply a break in the regular succes- 
sion as he came to the throne ; see p. 223, n. 1 below. 

At this point we may turn again to our earlier Iranian sources. 
As previously observed, neither the Avesta nor the Pahlavi writings 
are explicit in their statements as to the situation of Vishtaspa's 
capital. The Dinkart, it is true, speaks several times of the 'abode' 
(man), ' residence ' (baba), or ' lofty residence ' (buland maniSno) of 
Vishtasp, but there is nothing precise as to the location.^ The gen- 
eral allusions to Notar, moreover, have already been noticed above, 
p. 192, and they will be referred to again, p. 222. The nearest 
approach in the Avesta to a definite statement regarding Vishtaspa's 
whereabouts is found in two references to places where he offers 
sacrifice for victory in battle over Arejat-aspa in the holy war of the 
Eeligion, or when on a religious crusade. One of these sacrifices is 
offered ' on the farther side of the water of Prazdanava ' (Yt. 5. 108, 
pasne apam frazddnaom) for victory over three unbelievers one of 
whom is the inveterate foe, Arejat-aspa (Yt. 5. 109, T^dryavantam 
duzdaendm \ Palanamca daevayasnam | drvantdmca Arajatraspam).* 
But in Yt. 9. 29 = Yt. 17. 49, the same sacrifice is offered again by 
Vishtaspa for victory over exactly the same three foes, but includ- 
ing also the names of a number of other enemies ; and (important 
to keep in mind) the sacrifice of this latter passage is not celebrated 

1 See pp. 72-73. eludes India among the lands to which 

2 See also Mohl, tr. iv. 293. Vishtasp spread the gospel of Iran (cf. 
» Compare note on p. 58. Mohl, iv. pp. 843-344 ; and above, p. 
* It might possibly be suggested that 84 seq. ; observe likewise Darmesteter, 

we have in the name Tathryavant a Le ZA. in. Introd. p. 90). But such a 
distant allusion to the Tantra philoso- conjecture could add little in favor of 
phy of India ; the Shah Namah In- the eastern view. 


near the Frazdanava, but is offered up on the farther side of the 
river Daitya. Still further, Vishtaspa's brother Zairivairi (Zarir), 
who is mentioned directly after Vishtaspa's sacrifice by the Frazdar 
nava in the earlier passage, likewise offers similar worship on the 
same spot (Daitya), with an identical wish (Yt. 5. 112-113, pasne 
apo Daityaya) ; and directly afterwards in the same Yasht (Yt. 5. 
116) Arejat-aspa invokes the same divinity near Vourukasha (Caspian 
Sea) for victory over Vishtaspa. This latter point will be taken 
up hereafter, pp. 212-213. 

It is necessary to comment anew on the suggested identification of 
these places. From the discussion above, pp. 41, 197, it is to be inferred 
that the Daitya was a sort of border stream in the west, to be identified 
with the Kizel Uzen or Safed Eud. The river Kizel Uzen is the 
classic 'A/iap8os of Ptolemaeus, in Atropatene, and Andreas describes 
it as a natural ' markscheide.' ^ The Avestan word pasne is appar- 
ently used with a river name like the Latin usage of trans in Trans- 
Rhenanus (opp. Cis-Alpinus), compare the modern Iranian designation 
of Bla-Pis, ' before the rivers,' as opposed to BiarPas, ' back of the 
rivers,' used in the adjoining territory of Gilan.^ The various streams 
which flow into the river to-day woald answer to the tributaries of 
the Daitya that are mentioned in the Dinkart and Zat-sparam.^ 
This is the river of the ' Law,' and the river which Zoroaster appar- 
ently crosses on his way to convert Vishtasp.'' 

The Frazdanava, on the other hand, is to be sought in Seistan, 
in the east, if we accept the statement of the Bundahishn (Bd. 22. 5), 
and is probably to be identified with the Ab-istadah lake, south of 
GhaznI.' Being a member of the Kayanian line, Kavi Vishtaspa 

1 Andreas, Amardos, in Pauly's trasted with Pourusliaspa's dwelling on 
Meal-Encyl., neue Bearb., Stuttgart, the Darej, as that may have been the 
1894, vol. i. col. 1735, 1. 44. home to which he removed after his 

2 Refer to Andreas, loc. cit. 11. 60-61, marriage ; see suggestion on p. 192. 
whose transcription ' Bia-PiS ' is here ^ Zartusht Namah, p. 491. 
followed. Cf. also de Morgan, ilfissiore 6 xhis view is opposed to Lagarde's 
Scientifique en Perse, i. 209. Hranddn in Armenia {Beitrage zur 

sDk. 7. 3. 51-56; Zsp. 21. 5, 22.9. baktr. Lex. p. 28), but I agree with 

I believe that in Dk. 7. 20. 30, we are Geiger's estimate of Hrazdan in OIK. 

to read mayd'i M (not Doit), as noted p. 108. The identification of Frazda^ 

by West, 8BE. xlvii. 25, n. 2, and nava with Ab-istddah is mentioned by 

compare the Shet river of Bd. 20. 7, West {SBE. v. 86, n. 3) as being from 

SBE. V. 77 ; although there would be Justi (see his Handb. der Zendsprache, 

no real inconsistency in Dait, as con- p. 197 b), although Justi now seems 

212 APPENDIX ir 

is naturally associated with Seistan and Lake Trazdan. The Pahlavi 
treatise, 'Wonders of the Land of Sagastan/ makes Seistan the 
place of Vishtasp's first religious propaganda, and apparently also a 
place where Vishtasp conferred with Zoroaster and other apostles of 
the Paith, on matters of religious importance/ I am indebted to Dr. 
West's kindness for a translation of the 'Wonders'; the passage 
(Wond. of Sag. § 6) reads : ' King Vishtasp produced the progress 
of religion on Lake Erazdan, first in Sagastan, and afterwards in the 
other provinces ; also King Vishtasp, in conference with Zaratusht, 
and Seno, son of Ahumstut of Bust,^ because his disciples of Zara- 
tusht have been the first in his long discipleship, (made) the various 
Nasks proceed in a family of the good, for the purpose of keeping 
the religion of Sagastan progressive for being taught.' We remem- 
ber also that Zoroaster went in his earlier years to Seistan to preach 
to Parshat-gau (pp. 44-45). According to Firdausi, King Vishtasp 
(Gushtasp) was engaged upon a religious crusade in Seistan and 
Zabulistan,^ and was at the abode of the old hero Eustam, who still 
held out against conversion to Zoroastrianism, when the Turanians 
under Arjasp stormed Balkh, slew Lohrasp in battle before the 
walls, and killed Zoroaster.* Vishtasp returns from Seistan for 
the finally routing of Arjasp.' 

It must be acknowledged that the twofold sacrifice by Vishtasp, 
once on the Frazdanava and once on the Daitya, causes some diffi- 
culty in connection with the identification of scenes in the Holy 
Wars. As already observed, the Prazdanava sacrifice, when placed 
in Seistan, certainly refers to the second and final invasion. The 

rather to incline toward tlie view of ^ cf. Mohl, tr. iv. pp. 355, 456 ; and 

Hrazdan in Armenia, judging from also VuUers, Fragmente uber Zoroas- 

Freuss. Jahrb. Bd. 88, pp. 256-257. ter, Bonn, 1831, p. 97 and p. 126, 

Geiger, OIK. p. 108, notices the iden- n. 52. 

tification of Frazdanava with the Ab- * Shah Ndniah, ed. VuUers-Lan- 

istadah, hut he prefers to explain the dauer, iii. pp. 1559-1560 ; but there is 

matter differently. some uncertainty owing to a variation 

1 See West in Gdr. d. iran. Phil. ii. in the reading. Thus, Kih In herbadra 
118. Jcih kuH; and again, cird herhadrd li- 

2 Dr. West notes that this place is kuit; but a few lines further on (p. 
described by the pseudo Ibn-Haukal 1560) the death is proved by herbadra 
as on the river Hermand, between hamah sar zadand. 

Ghor and the lake (see Ouseley's Ori- ^ Mohl, iv. 354, 355, 365. 
ental Geography, p. 206) ; it was there- 
fore in Seistan. 


Daitya sacrifice, we may presume, refers to the first invasion, if -we 
make the twofold division mentioned on p. 105 ; but it is not easy 
to reconcile this with the assumption that the scenes of the first war 
belong rather to the territory of Merv (p. 114). Perhaps the Daitya 
sacrifice is not to be pressed as referring to a special incident, and 
perhaps the prayer was general ; or Vishtasp was crusading in the 
west at the time; history offers examples of a Christian king of 
Europe offering up his prayers in the land of the Saracens. Dar- 
mesteter^ does not seem to think it imperative to take the Daitya 
sacrifice too seriously in the face of the Frazdanava passage which 
gives a scene located in Seistan ; or, he thinks, the Daitya allusion 
may be a reminiscence of the Median origin of Vishtaspa himself. 
Nevertheless, there is a certain discrepancy which must fairly be 
noticed, and having stated the difiiculty we may turn to such argu- 
ments as can be brought up to show that Vishtaspa's foe, Arejat- 
aspa, belongs rather to the east than to the west. This introduces 
the problem of the situation of Arejat-aspa's kingdom, and the 
scene of the Holy Wars already alluded to. 

In the Avesta, Arejat-aspa is a Hyaonian (A v. Hyaona, Phi. Xyon)? 
The name h-yaona, according to the ordinarily accepted view, is iden- 
tical with the nation of the classic Chionitae.^ The identification, 
however, has been doubted by some. The subject is commented on 
by Darmesteter,* and especially by Geiger, and both of these schol- 
ars think (as well as Justi, see footnote) that there is authority 
also for the tradition which places the Hyaonians toward the east, 
even if they were located in the Gilan territory in the time of 
Ammianus Marcellinus (19. 1. 2). The Shah Namah tradition cer- 
tainly looks upon Arjasp as a Turanian, and places his kingdom 
on the other side of the Jihun (Oxus), and it makes him despatch 
envoys from the city of Khallakh to Vishtasp (Gushtasp) in Balkh.' 
In the native lexicons, according to Vullers, Khallakh or Khallukh 

1 Le ZA. iii. p. Ixxxiii. Sitsb., Mai, 1890, p. 75. Justi allows 

^ See Yt. 9. 30-31, 17. 50-51, 19. 87, also the possibility of placing the 

and the references on p. 104, n. 2. Hyaonians in the east on the author- 

' Spiegel in Syhel's Histor. Zeit- ity of Joshua the Stylite ; see Preuss. 

schrift, N. F. 8, p. 18 ; also other Jahrh. Bd. 88, p. 256 ; but Justi favors 

writers as noted below. the west. 

* Darmesteter does not seem certain ^ Firdausi, Livre des Bois, tr. Mnhl, 

of it in Le ZA. iii. p. Ixxxiii seq. ; cf. iv. pp. 302, 303, 319, 326 bis, 342, 360, 

also Geiger in Sitzb. d. K. B. Acad., 441, 459, 543, 558. 
1884, p. 328 seq., and in his Tdtkdr in 



(^JLi») is described as ' a great city in Turkestan in the district of 

Khatai.' * In any case, it is evident that the kingdoms of Arjasp 
and Vishtasp cannot have been far separated from each other. 
The question of the invasion or invasions may now be taken up. 

According to the sources vrhich the Shah Namah must have made 
use of (and we may infer the same from the Dinkart and Zat-spar 
ram)^ there were, apparently, two separate invasions by Arjasp, 
although the Avesta seems to speak of the war singly as 'the War 
of Eeligion.' The special chapter above on this subject (Chap. IX.) 
should be consulted. The Yatkar-i Zariran alludes only to what we 
may regard as the first of Arj asp's wars, and lays the scene in the 
neighborhood of the plain of Merv.' Similarly, in this connection, 
the Shah Namah speaks of the Jihun or Oxus, and the territory 
adjacent^ (consult the Map). The scene of the battles of the 
second war was Khorassan, if we follow the Shah Namah and 
notice an incidental allusion in the Bundahishn.^ The circum- 
stances of Arjasp's second invasion need not be repeated; see 
Chapter IX. If we follow the Shah Namah we may presume that 
Vishtaspa, after receiving news of the storming of Balkh, started 
from Seistan to join the forces of his son, Farshidvard, whom he had 
appointed ruler of Khorassan. The first meeting between Vishtasp 
and the invader Arjasp may therefore have resulted in an engage- 
ment in Khorassan. From Firdausi, we may judge that this open- 
ing engagement of the second war, which is evidently counted as a 
part of the Balkh misfortune, was not successful for the Iranians.* 
An attempt may be made to locate the scene. 

Now, the Bahman Yasht (3. 9), when speaking of three distinct 
times of crisis and trial in the history of the Eeligion, says : ' the 
second was when thou, O Zaratusht the Spitaman! receivedst the 
Keligion, and hadst thy conference, and King Vishtasp and Arjasp, 
miscreated by Wrath, were, through the War of the Eeligion, in the 
combat of Spet-razhur (" the hoary forest ") ; ' and the text adds a 

1 VuUers, Fragments iiber Zoroas- * Mohl, tr. iv. .309. 

ter, p. 121, where the Persian is quoted, ^ Bd. 12. 32-34, given in full on 

and Lexicon Persicum, i. 706, 714. p. 216. 

See also Steingass, Persian-English ^ Notice that the Bundahishn (Bd. 

Dictionary, pp. 467, 471. 12. 33) acknowledges an occasion 

" See chronological scheme by West, where there was ' confusion among 

SBE. xlvii. p. XXX.; cf. Appendix III. the Iranians,' hut they were 'saved'; 

8 YZ. § 12. cf. p. 216 below. 


comment : ' some have said it was in Pars.' ' The Avesta mentions 
the ' White Forest,' but not in connection with Arejat-aspa's name. 
The SpaSitita Razura in the Avesta, is the amphitheatre of the great 
conflict between the earlier Iranian king, Haosrava, and his enemy, 
Aurvasara.^ According to Justi, the White Forest is in Kohistan, 
a part of Khorassan (lat. 33, long. 59 ; consult Map), between Kain 
and Birjand.^ As a mere conjecture, in order to endeavor to recon- 
cile difficulties, it might be suggested that we have here an allusion, 
perhaps, to the engagement that preceded the last in the war. In 
other words, as the White Forest seems to have been a designation 
covering a good deal of territory, it might be argued that Vishtasp 
pushed onward, then northward to the mountains of Nishapur and 
Mesh-hed, not far from the high citadel where his son Isfendiar was 

This citadel, as related by the Shah Namah, was the mountain 
fortress of Gumbadan or Gunbedan (jjIj^^aS ).* Its location is 
in Khorassan,^ for this fastness of Isfendiar is evidently Mount 
Spento-data of the Avesta (Yt. 19. 6), and Spend-yat of the Pahlavi 
(Bd. 12. 2, 23), situated on the 'Var of Revand,' which latter has 
been identified with the Bar mountains, northwest of Nishapur, in 
an interesting article by Houtum-Schindler. * The Btindahishn 
adds details of the battle that enable us still further to locate the 
scene where Vishtasp himself had to take refuge in a mountain in 
Khorassan, where he was beleaguered,' until the heroic Isfendiar is 
released from his chains and gains the victory. All this has been 
described above (p. 119 seq.), but the Bundahishn passage is impor- 
tant enough to repeat it again in full : — 

1 West, 8BE. V. 218. As for the * Shah Ndmah, ed. Vullers-I an- 
usage of ' Pars,' it must be remembered dauer, iii. p. 1550, 1. 156 ; cf . traduc- 
that Sagastan itself is spoken of as a tion de Mohl, iv. pp. 354, 370, 456. 
part of Pars in Pahlavi literature (Bd. ^ But Mirkhond (tr. Shea, p. 290) 
12. 9, 20. 29 ; see SEE. v. pp. 37, says he was ' imprisoned in the For- 
81). tress of Girdkuh, in the district of 

2 Yt. 15. 31-32; cf. Yt. 5. 49-50; Rudbar.' To which Shea adds, stating 
Yt. 19. 77. that Eadbar is a district of the Jebal 

5 Justi, Namenbuch, p. 42, ' Aurwa^- or Irak Ajemi. 
sara, Konig am Weissen Wald, d. i. * The Identification of Some Persian 

Dascht-i Beyat im Kohistan von Qain Places, in The Academy, No. 730, p. 

und Birjand, Gegner des Kawa Hus- 312 seq.. May 1, 1886 ; cf. also Justi, 

rawa (Kai Xusrau), Yt. 16. 31. SySr- Hdbch. d. Zendspraehe, p. 305. 
wasnameh, 252.' Tor allusions to the 'mountain,' 


Bd. 12. 17-18 : ' The Padashklivargar mountain is that which is 
in Taparistan and the side of Gilan. The Eevand mountain is in 
Khurasan, on which the Burzhin fire was established. (32-34): 
Prom the same Padashkhvargar mountain unto Mount Kumish, 
which they call Mount Madofryat (" Come-to-help ") — that in which 
Vishtasp routed Arjasp — is Mount Miyan-i-dasht ("mid-plain"), 
and was broken off from that mountain there. They say, in the 
War of the Keligion, when there was confusion among the Iranians 
it broke off from that mountain, and slid down into the middle of 
the plain ; the Iranians were saved by it, and it was called " Come- 
to-help " by them. The Ganavat mountain is likewise there, on the 
Eidge of Vishtasp {puit-i Vistaspan) at the abode of the Burzhin- 
Mitro fire, nine leagues to the west.' '^ Mount Madofryat (Come-to- 
help) has been identified by Houtum-Schindler with the mountain 
near the present town of Fariumad, northward of the high road 
between Abbasabad and Mazinan, and it is thus evidently a part of 
the Jagatai range. ^ The Eidge of Vishtasp may be identical with 
the mountains, Binalud Kuh, running northwest from Nishapur, a 
little to the west of the modern Gunabad (lat. 36. 40 ; long. 59. 6 — 
see Map). The region where the final battle took place, with the 
utter rout of Arjasp and the triumph of Iran over Turan, may be 
regarded as occupying a territory to the east of Mian-i-dasht in 
Khorassan (lat. 36. 30 ; long. 56. 10 — see Map, square Gb). The 
caravan road between Mian-i-dasht and Zaidar is still famous to-day 
for marauding attacks of the Turkomans upon pilgrims and travel- 

The location of the sacred fires may be taken up in this con- 
nection. Vishtasp's special fire, Burzhin Mitro, is in Khorassan as 
already discussed in the pages devoted to the subject of the Sacred 
Pires (Chap. VIII.). Prom the passage just quoted (Bd. 12. 17- 
18, 32-34) and from Bd. 17. 8 there seems to remain little doubt on 
that point. The Shah Namah implies a similar location, and three 
Mohammedan writers state that the special fire of Zoroaster, which 
is the Burhzin Mitro, was in the neighborhood of Nishapur. Por the 
references, see p. 100. But more important still in connection with 

cf. Mohl, Lime des Bois, iv. 367, 370, 36-37 ; long. 56-57) on the map in 

373, 384. Curzon's Persia and the Persian Ques- 

1 West, 8BE. V. 40-41. tion, i. p. 245. 

2 See The Academtj, p. 313, May 1, ' Curzon, Persia and the Persian 
1886. The town is easily located (lat. Question, i. 276-277, 280-281. 


the ancient pyraea of Zoroastrianism, is the tradition of the 
Bundahishn (Bd. 17. 6) regarding the second famous fire, the fire 
Frobak (Farnbag). This fire originally was located in Khorasmia 
or Chorasmia (Phi. Khvarizem) on the eastern side of the Caspian 
Sea — the region of igneous oil fountains, and it was removed by 
Vishtasp to the east, to Cabul, or as the text reads : ' In the reign of 
King Vishtasp, upon revelation from the religion, it was established 
out of Khvarizem, at the Eoshan ("shining") mountain in Kavu- 
listan, the country of Kavul (Kabul), just as it remains there even 
now." This latter would make another distinct association of 
Vishtasp with the east.^ 

In addition to the central or eastern location of two of the sacred 
fires which are directly connected with Vishtasp's name, we may 
also recall the story of the cypress which Zoroaster planted to com- 
memorate the event of Vishtasp's conversion. This hallowed tree 
was planted at Kishmar in Khorassan, and it is spoken of in the 
Shah Namah as 'the cypress of Kishmar.'^' It must also be 
remembered that, according to the Shah Namah, Khorassan was 
under the suzerainty of one of Vishtasp's sons, as well as it was 
the amphitheatre of the final Holy War. 

These latter points are of interest also in connection with Moigl's 
claim that Vishtaspa, of the Avesta, is identical with the historical 
Hystaspes, father of Darius; and that he belonged in the region 
of Hyrcania and ancient Parthia. Floigl's monograph should be 

It may incidentally be added that the Armenian historian, 
Thomas Arzrouni (a.d. tenth century) follows the tradition that 
Zoroaster was the opponent of Ninus and Semiramis and was de- 
feated by them, but Semiramis made him commander of Babylon, 
Khoujistan, and of all eastern Persia, and he adds, 'Zradasht, 
although possessing the countries to the east of Persia, did not cease 
to harass Assyria.' ^ This would associate him also with the east. 

1 Bd. 17. 6, tr. West, SBE. v. 63. MoU, iv. 292-293 ; cf. also Appendix 

2 It must be stated, however, that II., pp. 163-164. 

the reading Kavul {Kabul) is ques- * Floigl, Cyrus und Herodot, Leip- 

tioned by Darmesteter, Le ZA. i. 154 ; zig, 1881, e.g. pp. 14, 15, 17, etc. 
and see the discussion above in Chap. * See Brosset, Collection d'Histo- 

VIII. p. 99, n. 4. riens armeniens, i. 30, St. P^ters- 

" 8arv-i Kismar; see Vullers-Lan- bourg, 1874. See Appendix VI. § 1 

dauer, iShah Name, iii. 1498-1499, and below. 


Furthermore, it should be noticed that Mills upholds the eastern 
region, at least as the place of origin of the Gathas.^ He reviews 
some of the indications which point to the west, as presented 
by Darmesteter; but after examining into the character of the 
civilization, and noticing points of Indo-Iranian unity and like- 
ness to the Veda, and judging also from the spirit of the Gathas, 
whose antiquity he emphasizes. Mills is led to believe that 'the 
scene of the Gathic and original Zoroastrianism was in the north- 
east of Iran, and that the later Avesta was composed during the 
hundreds of years during which the Zarathushtrian tribes were 
migrating westward into Media.' ^ A discussion of the Avestan cal- 
endar led the Sanskrit scholar Eoth strongly to support Bactria.^ 
The younger Iranist Horn favors eastern Iran as the first scene, at 
least, of Zoroastrianism.* On the views of Tiele, see note below." 

Resume of the Eastern View. — .Among various points that may 
be brought up in favor of placing Vishtaspa in eastern Iran, and of 
believing that Zoroaster's prophetic career, at least, was associated 
chiefly with that territory, is the predominance of geographical allu- 
sions in the Avesta rather to eastern Iran. The Avesta does not 
state where Kavi Vishtaspa's kingdom was located; but it recog- 
nizes that the Kavi dynasty came from Seistan (Yt. 19. 66 seq.). 
The Iranian tradition which is found in Mohammedan writers is 
almost unanimous in placing Vishtasp's kingdom in the east, in Bac- 
tria. Among arguments which may be drawn from Pahlavi litera- 
ture is the fact that the Bundahishn clearly locates the scene of the 
routing of Arjasp in the territory of Khorassan. One of the sacred 

1 SBE. xxxi. Introd. pp. xxvii-xxx. also in the genealogical table in his 

2 Op. cit. p. xxvii. article ' Keligions,' in Encyclopxdia 
5 Roth, Der Kalender des Avesta, Britannica, vol. xx. p. 360 (9th ed.), 

u. s. w., in ZDM&. xxiv. 1-24; cf. &\\\i Geschiedenis van den Gods- 

especially pp. 16-19 (criticised by diensf, p. 174 (Amsterdam, 1876). But 

deHarlez; seep. 219 below). now, if I understand his latest view 

* Horn, Die Seiche der Meder aright, he believes in northwestern 

und Pei-ser, in Hellwaldt's EuUurge- Iran as the cradle at least of the Zoro- 

schichte, 4 Aufl. i. 322. astrian Reform : ' Ook ik neig zeer 

^ Tiele, in his early work entitled tot de meening dat de zarathustrische 

De Godsdienst van Zarathustra, van hervorming van noordvrestelijk Iran is 

haar ontstaan in Baktrie tot den val uitgegan ' (Zeis over de oudheid van 

van het Oud-Perzische Bijjc (Haarlem, het Avesta, Aanteekening, in Mede- 

1864), maintained the Bactrian view deeling d. K. Ak. 3 de Reeks, Deel 

that was common at the time. So XI. Amsterdam, 1895, pp. 384 and375). 


■^res is connected with Khorassan ; another was removed from Kho- 
rasmia to the east. And now that so much has been said in favor 
of eastern Iran, including Bactria, we may pass without comment to 
the west and consider the claims of Media. 

2. Media and the 'West, or the View that Zoroaster's Ministry was 
in his Native Covmtry, Western Iran 

It has been indicated sufficiently that a number of specialists, de 
Harlez, Spiegel, Justi, and others, associate the earliest history of 
Zoroastrianism not with Bactria and the east, but alone with Media, 
in its broad sense, and the west. 

C. de Harlez, for example, in treating of the origin and home 
of the Avesta, as noted above, leaves eastern Iran out of considera- 
tion.^ His discussion of the subject should be read ; there is space 
here only to outline the reasons which lead him to confine the 
Avesta and Zoroastrianism to Media. I summarize them from the 
last article mentioned in the footnote: (1) Zoroastrianism and 
the Avesta is the work of the Magi, a tribe of Media, and the Magi 
are the Atharvans (irvpaidoi) of the Avesta. (2) The chief seat of 
the religion was the southern and southeastern coast of the Caspian 
Sea, as shown by the peculiar manner in which the peoples of the 
Caspian region and Hyrcania dispose of their dead. (3) Eagha in 
Media was the chief seat of the priesthood, and Media, therefore, 
was the centre of the Avestan religion. (4) The legend which 
makes Bactria the cradle of Zoroaster's faith, and claims that Vish- 
taspa was king and ruler of Bactria, is late ; it comes, in fact, from 
mediaeval times. Eastern Iran, in general, remains in the back- 
ground until the time of the Achaemenidae.^ Finally (6), the Parsi 
books themselves regard Zoroaster as arising from Media; and, 
even though many mediaeval sources connect Vishtasp with Bactria, 
as mentioned, there is not entire consistency in this, for some of 
them place him ia Persis. The epitomist Khvandamir, for example, 
in his life of Gushtasp,^ says that this king had the city of Istakhr 

1 See de Harlez's definite statements " For the latter statement, cf . BS. 

on Das alter und heimath des Avesta in xil. 110. 

SB. xii. 109-111, and Ber Avestische ^ See de Harlez, Av. Ealender und 

Kalender und die Heimath der Avesta- Heimath, p. 277 ; Spiegel, EA. i. 698 ; 

Eeligion, in Abh. d. Berl. Or. Congr. and Hyde, Hist. Relig. vet. Pers. p. 

ii. 270-277, Berlin, 1882 (criticising 318 (1st ed.) ; Eth^ in Grundriss d. 

Koth). iran. Philol. ii. 356. 

220 APPENDIX 17 

(Persepolis) as a royal seat — IstaJchr-i Fdrs ra dar aPmulk karda- 
did. Again, Beidawi {Life of Gushtdsp) says that Zardusht occupied 
a mountain, Naphaht, near Istakhr.' And Majdi {Zinat dlrMajdlis), 
after assuming that Zoroaster came from Palestine, adds that he 
gave himself out as a prophet in Adarbaijan.^ For these various 
reasons de Harlez concludes : ' AUes erklart sich, wenn man unter- 
stellt, dass der Zoroastrismus aus Medien stammt ; Alles wird 
dunkel, wenn man dessen Wiege in Baktrien sucht.' 

Spiegel has two or three times specially treated the question of 
the home of the Avesta and its bearing upon the Zoroastrian 
problem.^ In his historical article on Vishtaspa and the Bactrian 
kingdom, in Sybel's Zeitschrift, he brings up most of the points that 
may be argued in favor of the east, — and these are such as have 
been stated above; he then weighs the west over against them. 
He particularly emphasizes the identification of Arejat-aspa's nation, 
the Hyaona, with the Chionitae, who are to be placed, it is claimed, 
to the west of . the Caspian Sea. Again, he approves rather of de 
Lagarde's identification of the name and locality, Frazdanava, with - 
the Armenian river Hrazdan ; and he points out some other names 
that refer especially to the west. As a result of this, although 
' Baktra ' is mentioned in the title of his monograph, he inclines to 
favor Media or Arran, rather than Bactria, as the realm of Vish- 
taspa and also as the home of Zoroaster. In his latest article on 
the subject (ZDMG. xlv. 280 seq., 1887), Spiegel points out one or 
two more points to strengthen the western view. An allusion to 
Armenia, for example, is claimed to be found in the Avesta (Yt. 
5. 72). He draws attention also to the association of Hystaspes' 
name with Media and the west, by Chares of Mitylene (cf. p. 73 
above),* and by Lactantius, who makes Hystaspes a king of Media 
(p. 154 above) ; and he throws renewed doubts upon the existence 
of the Bactrian kingdom maintained by Duncker.^ 

Several other scholars are of like opinion regarding Media and 

1 See also Hyde, p. 313. Reference in Sitzb. der K. B. Acad. 1884, p. 315 
to Istakhr (Persepolis) has been made seq. (1884). Again, ibid. (Zweiter 
above, pp. 91, 97. Artikel) in ZDMG. xlv. 187 seq. 

2 See also Hyde, p. 315. (1891)! 

s Spiegel, Vistafpa oder Hystaspes * Cf. also his later remarks in 

und das JReich von Baktra, in Sybel's ZDMG-. xli. 295 (1887), xlv. 197 (1891), 

Histor. Zeitschrift, N. F. 8, Bd. 44, lii. 193 (1898). 
pp. 1-21 (1880). Also Ueber das « ZDMG. xli. 288, 289, 292 seq. 

Vaterland und Zeitalter des AwestS, 


•western Iran. Eugen Wilhelm upholds Spiegel's identification 
of the Hyaonians with the Chionitse and locates them on the west 
side of the Caspian Sea. The associated Avestan word varaSaka 
(Yt. 9. 31 = Yt. 17. 61) is likewise a proper name, i.e. Varedhaka, cf. 
Vertae, of Ammianus Marcellinus ; and Av. Jiunu (Yt. 5. 64) desig- 
nates the Huns.' Lehmann expresses his opinion very strongly 
that the ancient Vishtaspa was not a Bactrian prince, but that he 
ruled in western Iran, in Media ; that Zoroaster had nothing what- 
soever to do with Bactria, where the crude civilization of his time 
would have been unsuited for his teaching, but that Media fur- 
nished exactly the soil that was needed for it to bear fruit.^ Darme- 
steter several times expressed himself in favor of the west for the 
entire scene of early Zoroastrianism, because he considered the 
Bactrian tradition rather to be late.^ 

Justi. The most recent authority to touch upon the question 
and to uphold the western view is Justi (Die dlteste iranische 
Religion und ihr Stifter Zaratliushtra).* A brief summary of the 
deductions on this point in his important treatise is given. The 
numbered divisions are my own : — 

1. The Avesta itself does not place either the home of Zoroaster 
or the kingdom of Vishtaspa in Bactria, nor mention either name 
in alluding incidentally to the city of Bactria. The rise of the 
Bactrian kingdom was post-Achaemenian. The transferrence of 
Vishtaspa's capital to Bactria, as is done in later times, is purely 
artificial. Spiegel's arguments are sufficient to overthrow the whole 
theory of a Bactrian origin of the Iranian religion. 

2. The allusions to the sacrifices by Vishtaspa and Zairivairi on 
the Frazdanava and Daitya, and to Arejat-aspa as a Hyaona, are 
examined in their eastern aspect and in the western light. In 
Justi's opinion the Daitya may be the Araxes on the northern 
boundary of Adarbaijan, and the Frazdanava is more likely, 
perhaps, to be the Armenian Hrazdan. Acts of worship performed 
in the Adarbaijan territory would be appropriate to Iranians. 

1 Wilhelm, ZDMa. xlli. 96-101. 1. 10-13 ; Zend-Avesta, tr. 8BE. iv. 

2 Edv. Lehmann, Die Ferser in Introd.xlvii-liii (1st ed.); and his later 
Chantepie de la Saussaye, Lehrbuch statement, p. Ixvii (2d ed.), together 
der Religions- Geschichte (neue Aufl.) with Le ZA. iii. p. Ixxxiii, where nu- 
ii. 159-160. See also his comment on merous suggestions and hints are given. 
Phraortes, p. 156. * In Preussische Jahrbiicher, Bd. 88, 

3 Darmesteter, Etudes Iraniennes, p. 255 seq., 1897. 


More weight also is laid on the likelihood of the Chionitse being 
placed in the Caucasus region and Gilan. Like the later Huns, 
the invasion of Arejat-aspa may have been made through the moun- 
tainous country to the west of the Caspian Sea. 

3. It is notable that of the three most sacred fires one (Adhar 
G-ushnasp) belongs originally to Adarbaijan, one (Adhar Xurrah, or 
Farnbag) to Persis (Istakhr), and one (Adhar Burzhin Mithr) to 
Khorassan, but none to Bactria. Yet see note at foot of this page.' 

4. Media was the native place of Zoroaster, and it was also the 
home and realm of Vishtaspa. But Kavi Vishtaspa was not a great 
king, not a 'king of kings' (Anc. Pers. xsayadiya xSayaOiyana/ni) ; 
he was rather a minor prince (dahbhupaiti) of Median Eagha. The 
suggestion is conjecturally put forward that we might, perhaps, 
assume that some great king of Media later accepted the religion 
and made it current in the world. Such a monarch would have been 
the Median Praoreta (Phraortes) * Confessor,' who may have adopted 
the faith and have thus received a Zoroastrian name. The father of 
Phraortes also had a Zoroastrian name as he was called Kyaxares 
(i.e. Huvaxsatara), beside his ordinary title Dahyauka. 

5. Finally, by way of illustration, Atropates and his successors 
in Atropatene were zealous adherents of Zoroastrianism from 
Achaemenian times, and the Gathas themselves show a religious 
intolerance that still remains typical of the Magi in Sassanian 
times, and is characteristic of the fanaticism that marks the later 
Assassins who likewise had their origin in Atropatene.^ I may also 
add that Justi wrote me that it was only after long and careful con- 
sideration that he came to these conclusions and abandoned the 
view that Bactria was the home of Zoroastrianism or that Zoro- 
aster perished there.' 

Additional Arguments. — Some other arguments might be added to 
these already given in support of the west. Por example : — 

1. Vishtaspa and Hutaosa in the Avesta both were Naotairyans. 
The comment in Zat-sparam places Notar in the west, sixty leagues 
from Cist, as explained above (p. 193, n. 1). If Vishtasp be asso- 

1 Justi, op. cit. p. 257 ; but with count for their not generally being con- 
regard to the Tarnbag fire he seems to neoted with that particular region, 
have overlooked the statement in Bd. 2 cf. op. cit. pp. 259, 256. 
17. 6 ; see p. 99, n. 4 and p. 217 above. » Letters dated Jan. 8, 1897, and 
The question whether Bactria has any June 12, 1897. 
volcanic or petroleum fires might ac- 


ciated with Balkh, one would then have to assume that only his 
family came from the west. It is true that this might be quite pos- 
sible in royal lines, and there actually seems to have been some 
change of dynasty or break in 'the succession when Vishtasp came to 
the throne, as noted by Justi,^ so this argument would not necessarily 
militate finally against the east ; it is only a matter of proportionate 
probability. On account of the Eagh and Notar allusion it would 
be convenient to accept Vishtasp as also belonging to the west. 

2. The two Avestan Yasht fragments (Yt. 23. 4, 24. 2) give 
among the blessings which Zoroaster wished might accrue to Vish- 
taspa the boon : ' Mayest thou be able to reach the Ea^ha, whose 
shores lie afar, as Vafra Navaza was able.' According to Darme- 
steter the circumambient stream EaTsiha in the Avesta is to be 
identified with the Tigris.^ This might, therefore, be used as a 
ground for placing Vishtaspa's kingdom in the west, but not neces- 
sarily so ; the wish of a wide-extended kingdom might hold equally 
good if the star of Vishtasp's empire were moving from the east 

3. As the Avesta constantly speaks of idolaters, unbelievers, 
devil-worshippers (daevoryasna) it might be suggested that Zoroas- 
ter's reform was especially directed , against the Yezidls, or devil 
worshippers, of the region about the Caspian Sea.' 

4. Arejat-aspa as noted above, p. 211, is represented in the Avesta 
(Yt. 5. 116) as offering sacrifice near the sea Vourukasha (the 
Caspian Sea) — upa zrayo vouru-kasdm — asking for victory over 
Vishtaspa and (later addition) Zairivairi.* It might be claimed that 
we have Vishtaspa's enemy not only on the Caspian Sea, but pos- 
sibly on the west side of it, although the expression with upa might 
equally refer to the eastern side of the Caspian which is still occu- 
pied by Turkomans. 

6. A somewhat fanciful conjecture might be made that we may 

1 Justi,op. cit.,pp. 246, 252, onapos- London, 1893; Bassett, Persia, the 
sible change of dynasty, and Spiegel, Land, of the Imams, pp. 31-33, New 
ZDM&. xlv. 196-198. Cf. p. 70, n. 2 York, 1886. 

above. * The mention of Zairivairi would 

2 Le ZA. ii. 382, u. 73, 78 ; but imply that the first invasion is in- 
Geiger, OIK. map, makes Eawha the tended if we follow the division into 
Vaxartes. two wars, p. 105. Notice may here 

8 On the Yezldis, see Browne, A be taken of what is said of Zariadres 

Tear Amongst the Persians, p. 522, and his realm on p. 73 above. 

224 APPENDIX ir 

perhaps have an allusion to the west (possibly Persepolis ?) in the 
Dinkart reference to the 'treasury of Shapigan' (or Shaspigan, 
Shapan, or Shizigan — for such are the readings allowed by the 
MSS.), in which Vishtasp deposited the original codex of the 
Avesta.^ As further related in the Dinkart this fell into the hands 
of the Greeks and was translated into their tongue. The treasury 
of the archives is usually associated with Persepolis.^ 

6. Hamzah of Isfahan connects Vishtasp with Persia, for he 
makes him build a city in the district of Darabjard in the province 
of Persia.^ 

ResumS of the Western View. — The more general claim in favor 
of western Iran is, that the religion was probably developed in the 
country where Zoroaster himself arose ; that in his day Bactria was 
still in the earliest stages of civilization and its name is not con- 
nected either with his or with Vishtasp's in the older texts ; that 
Media, on the other hand, would have been a suitable field for his 
teaching and that the allusions to the west give a more consistent 
theory for ancient times. It is claimed, moreover, that Vishtaspa's 
foe, Arejat-aspa, belonged to western Iran, on the ground of identi- 
fying the Hyaona with the classic Chionitse and of placing these in 
the Caspian region. Finally, Vishtaspa was a minor king, and it is 
possible that the Median ruler Praortes ('Confessor') may have 
made Zoroastrianism the national religion of Media. The devil- 
worshippers of the Avesta would answer to the later Yezldis of the 
western territory. 

General Summary 

Although we may agree that Zoroaster by birth arose in western 
Iran, we cannot be equally sure that the chief seat of his activity 
was also there. Both sides of the latter question have been pre- 
sented, as were the former. The classical references (as early as the 
second century a.d.) would imply the possibility of Bactria or the 

iDk. 3. § 3, 7. 7. 3, n., 5. 3. 4; is repeated from Tabari by Bundari 

SBE. YxxYii. p. xxxi ; SBK xlvii. pp. (with reading Zarbisht?) in Hyde, 

82, 127. Hist. Belig. vet. Pers. pp. 314-315. 

2 See also Tabari (p. 675, Leyden See also above, Chap. VIII., p. 97. 
ed.) : ' Bishasp sent this (archetype) to " See Hamzah, ed. Gottwaldt, ii. 26, 

a place in Istakhr called Darbisht ' and cf. Darab D. P. Sanjana, Gfeiger^s 

(vocalization uncertain), Gottheil, i?e/- Eastern Iranians, ii. 212, note by 

erences to Zoroaster, p. 37. The same Spiegel. 


east, as a scene, as well as of Media (Persia) and the west. This 
fact might be interpreted that he taught in the east, though he arose 
in the west. The Avesta does not decide the case. An allusion to 
the scene of Vishtaspa's two sacrifices may equally refer to Seistan, 
and to Media and Atropatene. From evidence in Pahlavi literature, 
we know that Zoroaster himself was in Seistan for a while, during 
the early part of his prophetic career. From the same source we 
also know he was in Turan, and the Gathas allude to a Turanian 
adherent. This would seem to speak, in part at least, for eastern 
Iran, even if his patron Vishtaspa ruled in western Iran. From the 
Pahlavi and later Zoroastrian literature, the scenes of the Holy Wars 
would appear to have been located rather toward the east, in Merv 
and Khorassan. On the other hand, the silence of the Avesta on 
some vital points in connection with the east, together with an infer- 
ence that Vishtaspa belonged to the same country as Zoroaster, and 
spoke the same dialect, would argue rather in behalf of western 
Iran. This latter view would be strengthened if the existence of a 
Bactrian kingdom at an early period be doubted. The majority of 
Iranian specialists, perhaps, seem to have felt that a stronger case 
can be made for Media and the west as the scene alike of Zoroaster's 
activity and his birth. On the other hand, later tradition, which 
includes Mohammedan-Iranian sources, is almost unanimous in pla- 
cing Vishtasp's kingdom in Bactria, which is claimed to have been 
founded by Lohrasp. Having now presented both sides of the 
question, we may refrain from drawing a conclusion between the two 
views, for the present, and content ourselves with recalling what 
was said at the outset, that Zoroaster was a reformer, and he had a 
mission ; in modern times the field of a great missionary's work is 
not usually confined to a single part of a country, whatever it may 
have been in ancient times. 




Collected with the help of my student and friend Louis H. Gray, 
Fello'w in Indo-Iranian Languages in Columbia University, to whom 
I wish to express my thanks with sincerity for his constant readi- 
ness to give assistance, especially in collecting the so-called Zoro- 
astrian Logia. His kind aid is much appreciated. — A. V. W. J. 

The list is confined simply to such passages as mention Zoroaster by name. 
Its compass might have been greatly extended if allusions to Magi, Persians, 
Hystaspes, or the like, had been included. 

Much material from the Classics had already been gathered by Barnab6 
Brisson, De Begio Persarum Principatu, Paris, 1690 ; Hyde, Beligio veterum 
Persarum, Oxon. 1700. The first systematic and excellent collection, however, 
of classical references on Persian subjects in general was made by J. F. Kleuker, 
Zend-Avesta, Anhang z. 2ten Bd. 3ter Theil, Leipzig und Riga, 1783. This is 
still one of the standards. A different arrangement of the material is found 
in Eapp, Die Religion der Perser und der uhrigen Iranier nach d. Griechischen 
und Romischen Quellen, in ZDMG. xix. p. 4 seq., xx. p. 49 seq. (translated into 
English by K. B. Cama, Religion and Customs of the Persians, Bombay, 
1876-1879) ; it should be consulted, as it includes also Persian and Magian 
subjects. Consult also Windisohmann, Zoroastrische Studien, pp. 260-313, 
Berlin, 1863 (translated into English by Darab D. P. Sanjana, Zarathushtra in 
the Gdthds, pp. 65-141, Leipzig, 1897). On special classical references, see, 
likewise, Jacltson in JAOS. xv. 221-232; xvii. 1-22. 


1. Look lor the author under his approximate date given in this list, or consult 
reference by section (§) . 

2. Those marked with an asterisk (*) are cited as authorities by other writers or 
are mentioned by them. 

Abdias, in Eabricius, Codex apocryph. Novi Test. i. 402-742, Hamb. 1719. 

See § 50. 
Afer, C. Marius Victorinus (a.d. first half fourth century), ed. Migne, Patrolog. 

Lat. tom. 8. See § 23. 



Agathlas Scholiastikos (c. a.d. 536-582), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. torn. 88. 

See § 35. 
Ailios Theon, see Theon. 

Ainaias of Gaza (fl. a.d. 487), ed. Barthius, Leipzig, 1655. See § 34. 
Alcuinus (a.d. 735-804), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Lat. torn. 100-101. See § 40. 
Alexander Poluhistor (b.c. first century), see § 4, also cited under Georgios 

Sunkellos, § 41. 
Ammianus Maroellinus (c. a.d. 330-400), ed. Gardthausen, Leipzig, 1874. See 

Anathemas against Maniohseans, see § 43. 
Anonymi Vita Platonis, ed. Westermann, Paris, 1862 (same vol. as Diog. Laert.). 

See under Plato. § 1. 
Apuleius Madaurensis (temp. Antonini Pii), ed. HUdebrand, Leipzig, 1842. 

See § 11. 

* Aristotle (b.c. 384-322), cited under Pliny; Diog. Laert. 

* Aristoxenos (fl. b.c. 318), cited under Origen, Contr. Hser. i. 
Arnobius (c. a.d. 295), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Lat. torn. 5. See § 16. 

* Athenokles (date unknown) , cited under Agathias. 

Augustinus (a.d. 354-430), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Lat. torn. 32-47. See § 28. 
Aurelius Prudentius (a.d. 348-0. 410), ed. in usum Delphini, London, 1824. 
See § 26. 

Basilios (a.d. 329-379), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. tom. 29-32. See § 20. 
*Berosos (c. b.c. 250), cited by Agathias. 

Cedrenus, see Georgios Kedrenos. 

Chaldsean Oracles or Zoroastrian Logia, see § 51. 

Chronicon Pascbale (a.d. 627, last date), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. tom. 92. See 

Claudianus Mamertus (a.d. fifth century, second half), ed. Engelhrecht, Vienna, 

1885. See § 31. 
Clemens Alexandrinus (a.d. first century, end), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. tom. 

8-9. See § 13. 
Clemens Eomanus (Bishop of Rome, c. a.d. 91, but probably the works ascribed 

to him to be assigned later), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. tom. 1-2. See § 13. 
Cornelius Alexander Poluhistor, see Poluhistor. 
Cotelerius, ed. SS. Patrum, qui temp, apost. floruerunt Opera, Paris, 1672. See 

Cyrillus Alexandrinus (d. a.d. 444), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. tom. 68-77. See 

*Deinon (date unknown), cited under Diogenes Laertius. 
Diodoros Sikelos (temp. Augusti), ed. Midler, Paris, 1857. See § 3. 
*Diodoros of Eretria (temp. Augusti), cited by Origen, Contr. Hser. i. 
Diogenes Laertios (flr. c. a.d. 210), ed. Cobet, Paris, 1862. See § 16. 
Dion Chrusostomos (born c. a.d. 50), ed. Dindorf, Leipzig, 1857. See § 7. 

Epiphanios (a.d. 320-402), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. tom. 41-43. See § 21. 
*Euboulos (date unknown), cited by Porphurios, de Antr. nymph. 


Euohologion, siue Rituale Grsecorum, ed. Goarius, Paris, 1647. See under 

Anathemas, § 42. 
*Eudemos of Rhodes (b.c. fourth century), cited by Diog. Laert. 
*Eudoxos (c. B.C. 366) cited by Pliny; Diog. Laert. 
Eusebios (c. a.d. 264-340), Chronicon, ed. Aucher, Venice, 1818. See § 18. 

Eragmenta Historicorum Graecoruni, rec. Mtiller, 5 vols. Paris, 1841-1874. 

Geoponica siue Cassiani Bassi Scholastica de re rustica Eclogse (a.d. sixth 

century), ed. Beckh, Leipzig, 1895. See § 36. 
Georgios Hamartolos (c. a.d. 850), Migne, Patrolog. Gr. torn. 110. See § 43. 

See also under Chron. Pasch. 

* Georgios Kedrenos (o. a.d. 1100), see under Chron. Pasch., and also Migne, 

Patrolog. Gr. torn. 121. 
Georgios Sunkellos (a.d. eighth century, last half), ed. Dindorf, Bonn, 1829. 

See § 41. 
*Gregorios (c. a.d. 329-389), cited by Mich. Glukas. 
Goarius, ed. Euxo^.^T'o", Paris, 1647. See § 42. 
Gregorius Turensis (a.d. 538-593), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Lat. torn. 71. See § 37. 

Hamartolos, see Georgios Hamartolos. 

*Hekataios (d. c. b.c. 476), cited by Diog. Laert. 

*Hellanikos of Lesbos (c. B.C. 496-411), cited by Georg. Sunkell. 

♦Herakleides of Pontos (c. b.c. 360), cited by Plutarch, Adv. Colot., cf. also 

Anathemas and Petros Sikelos. 
Herennios or Philo of Byblos, see under Eusebios. 
*Hermippos (o. b.c. 200), cited by Pliny ; Diog. Laert. ' 

*Hermodoros Platonikos (e.g. fourth century), cited by Pliny; Diog. Laert. 
*Herodotos (c. b.c. 484-420), cited by Georg. Sunkell. 

Hieronymus (a.d. 331-420), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Lat. torn. 22-30. See § 24. St. Victore (d. a.d. 1141), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Lat. tom. 176-177. 

See § 46. 

Isidorus (c. a.d. 570-636), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Lat. tom. 81-84. See § 38. 

S. Johannes Chrusostomos (a.d. 354-407), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. tom. 47-64. 

See § 26. 
Johannes Ludos (born c. a.d. 490), ed. Bekker, Bonn, 1827. See § 32. 

* Johannes Malalas (a.d. sixth century, first part), see under Chron. Pasch. and 

also Migne, Patrolog. Gr. tom. 97. 
lustinus (temp. Anton. ?), ed. in usum Delphlni, London, 1822. See § 10. 
Julius Solinus, see Solinus. 

Kassianos Bassos, see Geoponica. 

Kedrenos, see Georgios Kedrenos. 

*Kelsos (a.d. second century), cited by Origen, Contr. Cels. i. 

*Kephalion (a.d. second century), cited by Georg. Sunkell. 


*Klearohos of Soli (b.o. fourth century), cited by Diog. Laert. 
*Ktesias (fr. b.o. 398), cited by Diodoros Sikelos ; Georg. Sunkell. 
Kurillos Alexandrinos (d. a.d. 444), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. torn. 68-77. 


Logia of Zoroaster, so-called, § 61. 

Lukianos (temp. Antoninorum), ed. Dindorf, Leipzig, 1858. See § 9. 

Magika Logia of Zoroaster, so-called, see § 61. 

Michael Glukas (a.d. twelfth century, first half), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. torn. 

158. See § 47. 
Migne edition, Patrologiffi Cursus Completus, Series Grceca, Paris, 1857-1866. 
tomm. 1-2 Clemens Romanus (Bishop of Eome c. A.D. 91). 

Clemens Alexandrinos (end of first century a.d.). 

Origenes (a.d. 185-254). 

Basilios (a.d. 329-379). 

Epiphanios (a.d. 320-402). 

S. lohannes Chrusostomos (a.d. 354-407). 

Kurillos Alexandrinos (d. a.d. 444). 

Theodoretos Kuraios (d. a.d. 457). 

Prokopios Gazaios (end of fifth century a.d.). 

Agathias Soholastikos (c. a.d. 536-582). 

Chronicon Paschale (last date a.d. 627) . 

lohannes Malalas (early part of sixth century a.d.). 

Photios (c. 820-0. 891 a.d.). 

Petros Sikelos (forgery of twelfth century a.d.? vide Krum- 
baoher, Gesch. derhyzant. Lit. 2, Miinchen, 1897, p. 78). 

Georgios Hamartolos Monachos (wrote 0. a.d. 850). 

Georgios Kedrenos (end of eleventh century a.d.). 

Michael Glukas (a.d. twelfth century, first half). 
Migne edition, Patrologise Cursus Completus, Series Latina, Paris, 1878-1879. 
torn. 5 Arnobius (c. a.d. 295). 

C. Marius Victorlnus Afer (a.d. fourth century, first half). 

Hieronymus (a.d. 331-420). 

Orosius (a.d. fifth century, first half). 

Augustinus (a.d. 354-430). 

Gregorius Turensis (a.d. 538-593). 

Isldorus (c. A.D. 570-636). 

Alcuinus (a.d. 735-804). 

Hugo de St. Victore (ob. a.d. 1141). 

Petrus Comestor (d. a.d. 1178). 























Nikolaos of Damascus (b.c. first century), cites Xanthus of Lydia. See § 2. 

Oracles of Zoroaster, see § 61. 

Origenes (a.d. 186-254), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. torn. 11-17. See § 14. 


Orosius (a.d. fifth century, first half), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Lat. torn. 31. 
See § 27. 

* Ostanes, cited under Pliny ; Eusebios. 

*Panodoros (fl. a.d. 400) cited under Georg. Sunkell. 

Petros Sikelos (forgery of twelfth century a.d.? vide Krumbacher, Gesch. der 

byzant. Lit.^, Miinchen, 1897, p. 78), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Lat. torn. 104. 
Petrus Comestor (d. a.d. 1178), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Lat. torn. 198. See § 49. 
*Philon of Byblos (a.d. second century, first half), cited by Eusebios. 
Photios (c. A.D. 820-891), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. torn. 101-104. See § 44. 
Platon (B.C. 427-348) and Scholia, ed. Baiter, Orelli, Winckelmann, Ziirich, 1839. 

See § 1. 
Plinius Secundus (a.d. first century), ed. de Grandsagne, Paris, 1827-1832. 

See § 5. 
Ploutarchos (c. a.d. 46-120), Vitffi ed.Dbhner, Paris 1857-1862. See § 6. 
Ploutarchos (c. a.d. 46-120), Scripta Moralia ed. Diibner, Paris, 1841-1865. 

See § 6. 
Poluhistor, see Alexander Poluhistor and Solinus Polyhistor. 
Porphurlos (a.d. 233-306) , de Antro Nymph, ed. Herscher, Paris, 1858. See § 17. 
Porphurios (a.d. 233-306), Vita Protag. et Plotini, ed. Westermann, Paris, 1862. 

See § 17. 
Prokopios Gazaios (a.d. fifth century, end), ed. Migne Patrolog. Gr. torn. 87. 

See § 33. 
Prudentius, see Aurelius Prudentius. 

Soholiasticus Bassus, see Geoponica. 

Scholion to Plato, see § 1. 

*Simakos = Symmachos (a.d. fourth century ?), see under Agathias, ii. 24. 

Solinus Polyhistor, C. lulius (a.d. third century), ed. Salmasiiw, Utrecht, 1689. 

See § 19. 
Suidas (believed to be a.d. tenth century, but date not known), ed. Kuster, 

Cambridge, 1705. See § 46. 
Sunkellos, see Georgios Sunkellos. 

Theon Smemaios (temp. Hadrlani), in Walz's Rhsetores Grseci, Stuttg. u. 

Tubingen, 1832-1836. See § 8. 
Theodoretos Kuraios (d. a.d. 457), ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. tom. 80-84. 

See § 30. 
*Theodoros of Mopsuestia (a.d. sixth century), cited by Photios. 
Theologoumena Arithmetika, ed. Ast, Leipzig, 1817. See § 48. 
*Theopompos (fl. b.c. 338), cited by Diog. Laert. ; Ainaios of Gaza. 

Victorinus, see Afer. 

Xanthos of Lydia (e.g. fifth century), cited by Nikolaos of Damascus ; Diog. 

* Zoroaster, cited under Pliny ; Clemen. Strom. ; Origenes ; Eusebios, Prsep. Bv. ; 

Ainaias of Gaza ; Geoponica. 
Zoroastrian Logia, so-called, see § 61. 


§ 1. Platon 

(B.C. 427-347) 

Alkibiades Protos, 121 E-122 A (a spurious work, perhaps 
by Alexamenos of Teos, an elder contemporary of Plato and the first 
to compose Socratic dialogues. See Bergk, GriecMsche Literatur- 
geschichte, Berlin, 1887, iv. 469) : kirahav Se «7rT€r£ts yivtavTai ot TTatSes, 
ETTt TOiis iiTTrous Kttt £771 Tous TOVTUiv SiSatTKaXous (jiOiTwai, Koi em ras 6ripa.<; 
a.p)(0VTai iivai. Sis etttci 8e ytvofiivov iruiv tov TraiSa TrapaXa/jL^dvovcnv oSs 
iKiivoi /SacrtXctovs TratSaytoyoiis 6voiJ.d.^ovaiv " cttri 8e i^eiXeyfjiivoi Hepcrmv ot 
apuTTOi SdfavTES £i' ^Xi/cta TiTTapK, o re crof^wTaros Kai o StKaioraros Kai 6 
cr(a<l>pov4(TTaTO'S koL 6 dvSpEtoTaTos. (Si' o /uev p.ayda.v re SiSao'KU ttjv Zuipo- 
dcrrpov tov 'Opop,a.^ov,^ — ecrri Si tovto 6eu)v Oepaireia, — SiSatr/cei 8e Koi to. 
;8ao-tXtKa • o Se StKaioraros dXiy^emv 8ta Travros tov piov, k.t.X. 

Scholion on the Pirst Alkibiades: tTTTeTcis] ^ 8ia to toi/ 
Xoyov Tore ap)^ea6ai, TeXaovaOai, ij 8ta to tov TiiapodcTTprjv t,' yevop-evov etSv 
CTLdnrrjcrav, tiTO /ueTO X ;)(povovs i^riyijcracrOai t<S /Baa-iXei t^s oXrys <^tXoo-o<^tas, 
j^ (1)5 T(3 M.i9pa oIkcIov tov t, apiOp^ov, ov 8ta<^epovTOS ol Uipaai cri/iovcnv. 

ZiapodcTTpri'; dpp^aiOTEpos £^aKicrp(tXtois freaiv £tvat Xeyerat nXctTaJVOs • ov 
01 /i£V EWrjva, ol Sk tSv ck t^s VTrep ttjv p,eya.X.r]v OdXacra'av Tjireipov oipprj- 
jUEVoiv [irarSdJ ^am, re o'0(f>iav Trapa tov a.ya6ov Satp.ovo? eKpadiiv, 
Tovrio'Tiv ETTiTuxoBs voTQpaTO's • ov 87] £ts eXkT}vi.KrjV cf)(iivr]v p,eTa(f>pa^6fi,evov 
Tovvopa TOV ao'TpodvT-qv SijXol. nprjo'aC t£ auTOV rrjv avaKexwprjKvTav Sia- 
yiayyjv rCiv iroXkSiv, Koi 8^ Trjv tuiv ip.xj/v)((ov airoxov, <7vyypdp,paTd. te SLd<l)opa 
KaToXiTTEti', i$ S)v /cat SeUvva^Oai Tpia p-eprj ^tXoo-o0ias Etvat KaT avTov, 

<l>Va'iK6v, o'lKOVOpiKOV, TToXlTlKOV. 

Scholion to the Eepublic, X. p. 600 B: Ilv^ayopas Mn;- 
crdpxov SaKTvXtoyXwc^ov, Tvppyjvo^. veo? Se fuv 7j\$ev Ik TvpprjvSiv Ets %dp,ov, 
Kai SiTQKOva-e $EpeKu8oi)S tov Suptov, etra 'Ep/AoSayuavros, iv 2d/U<a ap<f>0LV, 
eiTa AySdpiSos tov 'YireplSopeov /cat Zaparos toO Mdyou. p,e6' ovi vjrb 
AtyuTTTtW Kai XaXSatW eiraiZeuQ-q. 

Anonymi Vita Platonis, ed. Westermann, p. 7 (Paris, 1862): 

pep,a6rjKU)i Se \^SC. 6 IIXaTtov] OTt ttjv o.p)(rjv Etj^ov t^s <fiiXo(TO(f>iai ot Ilii^a- 
yopeiot aTTO AiyvTTTOv, ^X9ev Ets AtywirTov, /cat /caTop^tocras ekeio'e t^v ycwp,eT- 
piav Kai TTjv lepaTLKr/v dve^toprjcrev. etr eXflui' eis ^olvikyjv ■irepUTV)(ev e/ceicte 
IlEpcrats /cat epaOe Trap aurots t^v Zuipodo'Tpov TraiSuav. 

1 Two Parisian MSS. (1811, 1812 — Becker's E, F) read S,pofd/iov. 


§ 2. Xanthos (b.c. Fifth Century), quoted by Nikolaos of 
Damascus (b.c. Mrst Century) 

This entire passage is in Nikolaos of Damascus (b.c. first century) (Miiller, 
FGH. iii. 409). Xanthos wrote e.g. 465-425 (cf. Christ, Griech. Litera- 
turgesch.^ 278 ; Bergk, op. cit. 240) (in Muller's Fragm. Hist. Grcec. i. 
pp. 36-44). 

Fragm. 19 (Miiller, p. 42) : Kpotcro) fiev ovv raxv a-Tiyaa-/j.a Tropfjyvpovv 
virepeTavov • tois 8e a.v9p<i)iroi,i ra jxkv vtto tpt^ov Kai XaiAairos TapaTTOjj.i- 
VOL'S, TO, Si viro tSiv dcTTpaTrSiv, KUTaTraTovfJi.evoi'S vtto ruiv imraiv Tpa^vvofiivoiv 
wpos Tov i[/6^ov Tu>v ppovTUiv, Setynara Saip-ovia iveirnrTCV, koI oi re t^s 
S'/JuXXtjs •j^prqfTp.oi KoX TO. Zoipodarpov \oyia eicrijet. Kpoicrov fjiev ovv i/36<i)v 
en iJ.a.X.Xov rj TrdXai crm^eiv • avTol Se KaTairiTTTovTei €is y^v irpoo'EKvvovv, 
ev/j.lveLav Trapa. tov 6eov atTou/UEi/oi. (jiaa-l Si rives 0a\^v TrpouS6p.(vov tK 
Ttv<i)v (Trjjji.auiv op-fSpov yivrjcropievov Kai dva/u.eveii' ttjv &pav iKeivr]v. tov 
ye p.r)V Ziopoa.o'Tpnjv Uepcrai. air Ikuvov SieiTrav, p-riTC veKpovi Kmav, prji' 
aXXft)s ixiaCveiV TTvp, kol iraAat tovto Ka^ecrrus to v6ixip.ov Tore ySe/SatcD- 

See also Xanthos cited below under Diogenes Laertios, § 15. 

§ 3. Diodoros Sikelos 

("Wrote in the Eeign of Augustus) 

Lib. I. 94. 2 : kol Trap' erepon Se TrXuocriv Wvecri TrapaSiSorai tovto to 
yci/og TYj's kirwoia'S virdp^ai Koi ttoWZv a.ya6!!>v aiTiov yevicrOai tois TreKr^eitri ' 
vapa, p.iv yap tois Aptavots Zadpavo'TTjv io'Topovcri tov aya$bv Saip.ova trpod- 
Troti^o-atrSai roiis vo/xovi airai SiSwai, Trapa 8e rots ovop.a^o/xivoi.'S Terats tois 
aTraOavaT Cloven ZidXp.o^iv oxravrcos ttjv Koivrjv 'Eariav, Trapa Sk tois 'lovSaion 
M.oyvarjv tov lao) iTriKaX.ovfjLevov 6e6v, k.t.A.. 

II. 6. 1—2 : o 8 ovv NiVos /nera ToaavTrj's Sum/icws crrpaTeva'a? eis ttjv 
SaKTpiavrjv ^vayKa^eTO, 8vo-€t(ry8oA(OV "^ tu>v tottidv Kai <rT€Vuiv ovTtov, Kara 
//.epos ayetv tyjv Svvap,iv. 17 yap HaKTpiavr/ X'^P"' ToAAats Kai yueyoXais 
olKovp,ivq TToAecri, p,iav jxlv e(-X^v eTTK^aveo-raTiyv, iv y OTJveySatvev itvai kol 
TO. jSao-i'Xeta • avrri S iKaXuTO /itev BaKTpa, /xeyiOa Se Kai t^ kotoi t^v 
d/cpoTToXiv oxypoTrjTL TToXii 7rao-<i)v Ste^epc. jSaa-iXevoiv 8' aur^s 'Ofvapriys^ 
Kareypai/fei' aTrai/TOS rovs ei/ ijA.iKtci (TTpaTiM? ovTai, ol tov api.6p.ov rj6pola6r]- 
(Tav eis TtTTapaKOVTa p.vpidSa'S. avaXa^lav ovv ttjv Swafiiv Kai tois iroXe/iiois 

1 Gilmore, SvaK6\a>v. 

s Codd. A, B, D, 'EJo(</)T5;j ; P, UaipTris ; G, M, 4 ZaiJ/iTjij (Gilmore). 


aTraVT-qa-ai trepl ras et(r|8oXas, tiao-e /xepo'; rijs tov NtVov CTTjoaTtSs etCT/SaXeti/. 
ETrei 8 eSofev LKavov aTroySe/SijKtVat rfi)' TroXe/itW ttX^^os eis to irtSiW, f^ira^e 
TTjv ISiav Svya/XLV. yevo/]'; Si fJ-o-XV^ l<T)(upa'S oi SaKTpiavol tous Acrtrv- 
pi'ous Tpiij/dp.ei'oi Koi tov Biiay/xov /i^XP' ''''^'' ^"■e/JKet/^evwi' opii' 7roi7jcrdiJ,evoi, 
Ziii^Qupav rmv Tro\eiJ,iu>v eis Sexa fivpidSa^. fiiTO. 8e raiira irdo"/]'; T^s Swa- 
fiEcos ei(7j8aXovcr5js K.paTOvit.(.voi tois 7r\»;^ecrt, Kara 7roA.£6s a7re)(i!>pr](Tav, l/caCTTot 
rais tSiais ira-TpitTi ^orjOrjcrovTK. ras /icv one oAXas 6 NiVos ep^etpwcraTO paSt'us, 
TO. Se BaKTpa Sui te t^v 6yyp6Tr)ra. Koi tos ei/ auT^ wapao'Mva.'S •^Swaret Kara 
Kpdro's eXelv. ■iro\v)(p6vov^ Se T^S iroXtopKtas yevofx.evrj's 6 t^s ^e/MpafiLiBos 
dvrjp eptOTiKuis eX'"'' ^pos T^v ywaiKa »cai crvaTpaTivoixevoi t<3 PauiXei, /lere- 
Trifi^aTo r-qv avOptoTrov. tj Se avvecrei koI toX/hj/ Kat rots aXXots rots Trpos 
lTri(j>dvuav (TVVTWovcri K€)(oprjyrjiJ,ivT}, Kaipbv eXa/Sci' lTri.te.L^acrBa.1 ttjv tStav 
aperriv. TrpSiTov pikv ovv ttoXXGi' ■^/xeplav bSbv /xiWovira SiaTroptvendai (TToX.rjV 
eirayp,aTevcraTO, 8t' ^s ouk ^v Siayvoivat tov Trepi^St/SXTj/xei/ov irorepov a.vrjp 
icTTiv ^ yuv^. avT?; 8 ^v ivxprjiTTOi avrrj Trpos t£ tois £V Tots Kavit.a(7LV oSoi- 
TTopias, €ts TO SiaTTjp^crai tov tov <T<!i)x.a.TOi ^puiTa, Koi Trpos Tcis ev t<o irpaTTUv 
o PovXoiTO xpEics, evKivTjTOs ovcra Kal veaviKij. Kot to o-woXoi' Tocravrrj tis 
eTriji' auT^ X'^'P'* •So'fl' vo'Tepov MijSous rfyy^a-aixkvovi t^s Ao'i'aj, <j)Opiiv Tr)V 
Se/itpajniSos o'ToXijv, Kai p.eTa TaS^ o/iotios Hepo-as. ■jrapaycvop.ivr) 8 £ts 
T^v BaKrptan;!', Kai KwrafTKe^aixivrj to. Trept t^v ■TroXiopuav, empa Kara fiev 
TO. TrtSta Kat tows evetjioBovi tS>v tottoiv Trpocr/SoXas yivop.iva,<;, irpbi 8e t^v 
aKpoTToKiv ovSiva. TrpotxioVTa, Sto. T^v 6y(yp6n)Ta • Koi tous IvSov diroXeXoMroTos 
Tcis eVTaii^ot^ </)i;XaKas, Kai irapiTTL^orjOovvTai Toli iiri tuiv KotTd) Tetx*^'' Ktv8i;- 
vevouo^i. 8to7r£p TrapaXa/SoCaa tSv CTpaTicoTSv tovs verpo^aTftv etcuSoras, 
Kai //.cTa TOVTiov Std Ttvos X'"^^''^* ^apayyos TrpocravaPatra, KwrfXa^ero jxipoi 
Trj<; aKpoiroXccos, Kai toTs ■TroXiopKovcri to KaTo, to TreSt'oi' Ttixos ecny/iiyvev. oi 
8' evSov £7ri t^ KaToX^i/ret T^s aKpos KaTajrXayei'Tes, i^i\nrov' to. Ttiyi), koi 
T^S <T(iyrqpio.<i airiyvuxrav. 

§ 4. Komelios Alexander Poluhistor, quoted by Other Writers 

(B.C. First Century) 

Fragmm. 138-139, apud Clem. Alex. Strom. 1. 15 (torn. i. col. 776, 
ed. Migne) et Cyrill. adv. lul. IV. p. 133 (torn. ix. col. 706, ed. 
Migne) : 'AXc^avSpos 8e iv tc3 irepi IIiiSoyoptKSv o'v/ijSokmv NafapaTu 
T(p 'Acravpiia /j.aO'^Tevaai IcrTopii tov HvOayopav ('Ic^eKt^X tovtov f/yovvTai 
rives, ouK eoTTt 8e <J)S oretTa ST/Xw^ijoreTai), a.KrjKoivai te wpos Tovrots FoXaTfiv 
Kai Bpax/*ai/o)v tov Ilv^ayopav ^ovXtTai. lOTopei yovv AXe'^avSpos o 

1 Miiller, iroAux()oWoi/. " Miiller, ^vtoC9o. 


iTTLKXrjv IloXvlaToip cc tiS wcpi TlvOayopiK&v (rviJ,fioX,<av AcravpLto to ycvos 
ovTi T(5 Zdpa <jyoi,T^(Tai tov Tiv6a.yopav. 
See also under Georgios Sunkellos, § 41. 

§ 5. C. Plinius Secundus 

(A.D. 23-79) . 

Nat. Hist. VII. 15: Eisisse eodem die quo genitus esset unum 
hominem accepimus Zoroastrem. eidem cerebrum ita palpitasse, ut 
impositam repelleret manum futurae praesagio scientiae. 

XI. 97 : Tradunt Zoroastrem in desertis caseo uixisse, ita tempe- 
rato ut uetustatem non sentiret. 

XVIII. 55 : Adiecit iis Accius in Praxidico ut sereretur, cum luna 
esset in Ariete, Geminis, Leone, Libra, Aquario. Zoroastres sole 
duodecim partes Scorpionis transgresso, cum luna esset in Tauro. 

XXX. 2. 1 : Sine dubio illic orta in Perside a Zoroastre, ut inter 
auctores conuenit. sed unus Mo fuerit, an postea 6t alius non satis 
constat. Eudoxus, qui inter sapientiae sectas clarissimam utililissi- 
mamque eam intelligi uoluit, Zoroastrem hunc sex millibus annoium 
ante Platonis mortem fuisse prodidit. sic et Aristoteles. Hermippus 
qui de tota ea arte diligentissime scripsit, et nicies centum millia 
uersuum a Zoroastre condita, indicibus quoque uoluminum eius posi- 
tis explanauit, praeceptorem, a quo institutum diceret, tradidit Azo- 
nacem ipsum uero quinque millibus annorum ante Troianum bellum 
fuisse. mirum hoc in primis durasse memoriam artemque tam longo 
aeuo, commentariis non intercedentibus, praeterea nee claris nee con- 
tinuis successionibus custoditam. quotus enim quisque auditu saltern 
cognitos habet, qui soli cognominantur, Apuscorum et Zaratum Medos, 
Babyloniosque Marmarum et Arabantiphocum, aut Assyrium Tarmo- 
endam, quorum nulla extant monumenta? . . . primus quod extet, 
ut equidem inuenio, commentatus de ea Osthanes, Xerxem regem 
Persarum bello, quod is Graeciae intulit, comitatus ; ac nelut semina 
artis portentosae sparsisse, obiter infecto, quacumque commeauerat, 
mundo. diligentiores paulo ante hunc ponunt Zoroastrem alium Pro- 
connesium. . . . est et alia Magices factio, a Mose et lamne et 
lotape ludeis pendens, sed multis millibus annorum post Zoroastrem. 

XXXVII. 49: Celebrant et astroitem, mirasque laudes eius in 
magicis artibus Zoroastrem cecinisse, qui circa eas diligentes sunt, 


Ibid. 55: Zoroastres crinibus mulierum similiorem bostrychiten 

Ibid. 67: Daphniam Zoroastres morbis comitialibus demonstrat. 

Ibid. 58: Exebenum Zoroastres speciosam et candidam tradit, 
qua aurifices aurum poliunt. 

§ 6. Ploutarchos 

(About A.D. 46 to about a.d. 120) 

Vit. Numae, IV. : apa ovv S.^l6v ia-n, ravTa crvyx<^powTas ciri Tovrrm/ 
a-TnaTeiv, tl ZoXeu/co) Koi MtV<j> Kat ZtapodcTTprj Kol Nojua kol AvKovpyia, 
/Jao-tXctas Kv^epvSxTi. Koi TToXtTctas Siaxocr/Aovcni', ih to avTO ec^oira to 
SaL/jyOviov ; 

De Isid. et Osir. XL VI.: koX Soku tovto tois TrXa'orots koX o-o^oj- 
TaTOis. vo/xt^oucri yap oi p.iv Geovs ctvat Sijo, KaOoLTrep avrire^vous • tov //.ev 
ayaOZv, tov 8k <j>av\oiv SrjiJi,i,ovpy6v. oi 8e tov fxkv d/Acivova, 6t6v, tov Se 
Irepov, Saifjiova KaXovcriv • Sxrirep ZcopoacrT/jts o fj.dyo'S, ov ■7revTaKi(7)(i,Xioi,i 
Exeo-t Twv TpiMKZv ycyovivai. Trpvr^vTepov icrTopoStriv. ovtos ovv tKoXei, 
TOV fj-iv 'Qpofid^rjv, tov 8' KpujxdvLOv • kol irpoaaTre^aivero, tov fxiv ioiKe- 
vat ^coTi fjidkiiTTa tZv aldOyjTdv, tov S' l/i7ra\tv o-kotoi /cat ayvoia,, /xicrov 
8' d/A^oiV TOV MCOprjV elvai. 816 Kal M.i.Op-qv Ilipa-ai tov MicriTrjv ovo/id- 
^ouo-t • iBiSaie tc3 |u.«v cv/cTata ^uctv Kat •^(a.pia'Tripia,, t<3 8 aTrorpoTrata koi 
UKvOpiaird. woav yap riva koVtovtes 0/u.u)|iit Kokovp.ivqv iv oX/ttu, tov a8)7V 
dvoKaXoiivTot Kat tov ctkotov • etTa /ttifavTes at/xari, X.vkov c^ayevTos, €is 
TOTTOV dviJXiov iK<j}ipovtn Kat pvKTOVdi. Kat •yap tSv <J>vt!ov vojiltpvcri to. fjiiv 
TOV ayaOov demi, to. 8e toS kokov 8at//,ovos ctvaf Kat twv ^wuv, wcnrep Kvvai 
Kal opviOa^ Kal x^pcraCavii i)(Lvavs, tov dyaOov • tov 8e <j>avX.ov, Toiis ivvSpovi 
eivat • Sto Kat tov KTUvavra ■n'AetcrTOus €uSaimovtfoiio-tv. 

De defectu Oraculorum, X.: £p,ot 8e SoKowt TrXet'ovas Awat 
Kot [X,dt,ova<i airopiai ot to tSv Satp,dva)V ycvos €V /tco-oi Oilav Kal avOptl)- 
iruw, Kat Tpmrov Ttva t^v Kotvcovt'av ij/iaSv m^vdyov eis Tairo xai crvvaTTTOV 
iievpovTK • etre p,dy<j)V tS>v ircpl Z<jypoaa-TpT)v 6 Xdyos ovtos eo-Ttv, £tT£ 
©paKtos aTT 'Op<f>€U)^, e'lr AtywTtos, rj $pijytos, ws TCKp,atpop.6^a Tats 
iKariptaOi TcXeTats dvap,€j[tiyp,eva TroXXd 6vr]Ta Kal ■rrivOtp.a tS)V dpytafo- 
/ie'vcuv Kat 8pu>p,ivwv ttpSv opSvTes. 

Quaes t. Conviv. IV. 1. 1: ov ydp ifjLefi,vi^iJ.rfv, etTrcv o 4>tXtt)V oTi 
2(oo-do-Tpov ij/Atv vTTorpei^et o $iXtvos, ov <^ao-t /*^t€ ttotw )(prjcrdiJi,(vov aXXm 
p.-f\T iSia/xaTL irX^v ^ ydXoKTos Sia^iCxrat, irdvra tov /SCov. 


Ibid. IV. 5.2: Kal ri av Tts AlyvTTTiovi atriMTO t^s Toiavrrjs dXoytas ; 
OTTOV Kol Tous IIv^ayoptKous IcTTOpovui, Kol aXeKTpvova XevKov (rePecrdac, Kal 
Twv 6aXaTTi(jiV /iaXio-ra TpiyX-q^ Koi a.Kokrji^ri'i a.Trej(€a-9ai • roiis 8 airo Zuipo- 
da-Tpov jiidyovs Ti/xav jxev iv Tois /u.aXi(7Ta tov )(ep(raLov i-)^vov, iyfOaipew Se 
Tous evvSjOous /aSs, Kai tov airoKTUVOVTa TrXet'cTTOus 6eo^iX^ xai /jtaKapiov 
vo/tt'^etv ; 

De Animae Procreat in Timaeo, II. 2: xat Zaparas o HuSa- 

yopov StSatrKoXos ravrrjv [^$C. SwaSa] p,ei/ e/<aX« toS apiBp-ov jx-qripa, to Se tv 
■Karipa • Sio Kal /SeXriovas eirat tSv apiBji-mv, ocroi r-g /xovaSi, 7rpo(7£oiKacrt. 

Ibid. XXVII. 2 : ... avayKTjv r/v el/xapiJiivriv oi iroXXot koXoSctiv • 
*E;Li7re8oKA'5s §€ <f>i\iav o/xov Koi vtiicos ■ 'HpaicXeiTos 8e, iraXivrpoTrov appLOviriv 
Koap-ov, OKoiaircp Xvpiys /cat to^otj • IXap/imSi^s 8e <^£s km ctkotos • Ava^a- 
yopa's 81 vovv Koi anrapiav • Zuipodo'Tpr]'; 8e ^ew Kai Sai/AOi/a, tov /xev 'flpo- 
IxaaSriv KaXwv, tov 8' 'Apei/idviov. 

Advers. Coloten, XIV. 2 : ttoO yap 8)i/ t^s aotKi^Tov to /StySXiW 

£ypa<^€s; tva TavTO o'uvTt^tis Ta iyKXrjp,aTa /xr] TOts eKeivwv awTdyfiaaw 
IvTvyrj';, p,7j8' dvaXdj3rii els x^'P^is ApicTTOTeXous to. ircpi ovpavm Kal to, irepl 
xj/vx^i, ®iO(l>pd(TTov Se TO. irpos Toiis <j>vcnKow, 'HpaKXetSou 8e toi' Zwpo- 
dcTTprjv, TO Trepl Tuiv iv aSov, to irepl tSiv <t>v(Ti,K<S'; aTropovixevwv, AiKaiap)(ov 
Be Tci Trepl i/fu^^s, ev ots Trpos to, KvpLuiraTa Kal p^eyuTTa tSv tjivcriK&v iire- 
vavTiovp-evoi, Tip IIXaTOJn Kai iJi,a)(6pi,evoi SiaTeXovcri. 

§ 7. Dion Chrusostomos 

(Born about a.d. 50) 

Borysthenica Orat. XXXVI. (vol. ii. p. 60 f., ed. Dindorf): 
TO Se io')(ypov Kal reXeiov a.pp.a tov Aios ov8eis opa vpvijcrev li^iws twv TijSe 
oi!t£ "Oprjpo'i ovre HcrtoSos, dXXa ZiopodcTTpii'; Kal pdywv iraiScs aSov<n Trap 
eKeivov pxiOovTe's " ov HipcraL Xeyovcnv epwn <T0(j>ias Kal SiKaiocrvvrj's awo^ia- 
prjtravTa Tu>v SXXutv Ka6 avTov iv opei Tivl ^^v ' eneiTa a(j>6ijvai to opos 
irvpos avuiOev ttoXXoC KaTarTKri>pavTo<i ctuvc^"'? t£ KaecrOai. tov ovv fSamXea 
a-iiv Tols EXXoyi/icoTaTois Ilepo'Si' d^iKvetfrOai TrX-qtrlov, /SovXap-evov ev^aaOai 
T(S 6ei3 • Kai TOV avSpa e^eXOelv iK tov irvpbs mraOrj, t^avevTa Se auTots iXtwv 
Oappeiv KeXev(Tai. Kal Ovcrat Ovcrias Tivds, ws iJkovtos eis tov tottov tov Oecru, 
(TvyylyvecrOai tc pCTO. TavTa ov)^ airaaiv dXXa To2s apUTTa irpos oX^^ctav 
■jTC^VKoo'L Ktxi TOV Oeov o'vvic'vai 8wap.evois, ovs Ilepo-ai /xdyous eKoXtO'tv, 

1 On Herakleides of Pontos, of. Bahr, in Pauly's Beal-Encyclopadie, 
MiUler, Fragm. Hist. Grcec. ii. 197 ff. ; iii. 1142-1144. 


eiri(TTajt/,ei/ous OcpaTrtveiv to Sai/itonov, ov^ cus EXXijws ayvoia. rau ovo/uiros 
ovTUKs ovoixd^ovcnv avOputirovi yoTjras. 

§ 8. Ailios Theon 

(Flourlslied about a.d. 125 ?) 

Progymnasmata, 9: oi yap « TofivpK ij Matro-oyms, ij STra/jcS/Da 
■:7 'A;u,«you Tov SaKui' jSacrtXccos yui^ KpeiTTinv icrrl Kvpov, tj Kal vol ixa Aia 
SfjutpajHts Zopoa.(rTpov Tov BaKTptbxi, lyS?; iTvy)((aprjTiov Kal to fl^Xu tov 
appevos Eii/ai dvSpetorepoi', jatas /xev j; Suo yvvaiKSiv av&peiOTdrtov ovcrwv, 
appivtuv Se irap.TtoKKS>v. 

§ 9. Lukianos 

(Flourished about a.d. 160) 

Nekuomanteia, 6: Kal p,OL ttotc Siaypvirvovvri tovtiov h/cKtv iSoitv 
«s BaySvXfiva iXdovra SerjO^vai Tivos Toil' p-dytov tS>v Zo}pod(TTpou padrjTtov 
Kal StaSo^cov, ■^kqvov 8' avrovs CTraiSaTs re Kal TeXcrai's Titrtv dvotyttv Te ToB 
"AiSou Tas TTvXas Kai Kardyav ov av fiovXcovTai dcr^aXSs Kat o;7tO"tt) av^is 

§ 10. M. Iunian(i)us lustinus 

(Period of tbe Antonines ?) 

Hist. Philippicae, I. 1. 9-10: Postremum illi bellum cum 
Zoroastre, rege Bactrianorum, fuit, qui primus dicitur artes magi- 
cas inuenisse, et mundi principia siderumque motus diligentissime 
spectasse. lioc occiso et ipse decessit, relicto impubere adhuc filio 
Ninya et uxore Semiramide. 

§ 11. Apuleius Madaurensis 

(Born about a.d. 125) 

Florida, II. 15 (vol. ii. p. 59, ed. Hildebrand): Sunt qui Pytha- 
goram aiant eo temporis inter captiuos Cambysae regis, Aegyptum 
cum adueheretur, doctores habuisse Persarum magos ac praecipue 
Zoroastren, omnis diuini arcanum antistitem, posteaque eum a quo- 
dam Gillo Crotoniensium principe reciperatum. 

De Magia, XXVI. (vol. ii. p. 502 f., ed. Hild.): Auditisne 
magiam, qui eam temere accusatis, artem esse diis immortalibus 
acceptam, colendi eos ac uenerandi pergnaram, piam scilicet et 


diuini scientem, iam inde a Zoroastre et Oromazo auctoribus suis 
nobilem, coelitum antistitem? quippe quia inter prima regalia 
docetur, nee uUi temere inter Persas concessum est magum esse, 
hand magis quam regnare. idem Plato in alia sermocinatione de 
Zalmoxi quodam Tliraci generis sed eiiisdem artis niro ita scriptum 
reliquit : Sepairevecrdai 8e t^v i/'ux'?v, t^ij, (u jxaKOipie, ciruSats tutL ras Se 
€iro)8as Tovs Xoyov; elvai tovs xaAou's. quodsi ita est, cur mihi nosse 
non liceat uel Zalmoxis bona uerba uel Zoroastris sacerdotia ? 

Ibid. XXXI. (p. 514) : Pythagoram plerique Zoroastris sectatorem 
similiter magiae peritum arbitrati. 

Ibid. cap. XC. (p. 616 f.): Si quamlibet modicum emolumentum 
probaueritis, ego ille sim Carinondas uel Damigeron, uel is Moses 
uel lannes uel ApoUonius uel ipse Dardanus uel quicumque alius 
post Zoroastren et Hostanen inter magos celebratus est. 

§ 12. Clemens Romanus 

(About A.D. 30-100, but probably written later) 

Eecognitiones, IV. 27-29 (torn. i. col. 1326 f., ed. Migne) 
(only in Latin transl. of Eufinus ; dates about end of a.d. second 
century. Of. Schoell, Histoire Abrigie de la litt. grecque sacrie 
et eccUsiastique, Paris, 1832, p. 220 f . ; Christ, GfriecMsche Litera- 
turgeschichte, 2d ed. p. 732). 27: Ex quibus unus Cham nomine, 
cuidam ex filiis suis qui Mesraim appellabatur, a quo Aegyptiorum 
et Babyloniorum et Persarum ducitur geniis, male compertam magi- 
cae artis tradidit disciplinam ; hunc gentes quae tunc erant Zoro- 
astrem appelauerunt, admirantes primum magicae artis auctorem, 
cuius nomine etiam libri super hoc plurimi habentur. hie ergo astris 
multum ac frequenter intentus et uolens apud homines uideri deus, 
uelut scintillas quasdam ex stellis producere et hominibus ostentare 
coepit, quo rudes atque ignari in stuporem miraculi traherentur, cupi- 
ensque augere de se huiusmodi opinionem, saepius ista moliebatur 
usquequo ab ipso daemone, quern importunius frequentabat igni suc- 
census concremaretur. 

28 : Sed stulti homines qui tunc erant, cum debuissent utique 
opinionem, quam de eo conceperant, abicere, quippe quam poenali 
morte eius uiderant confutatam, in mains eum extoUunt. extructo 
enim sepulcro ad honorem eius, tanquam amicum dei ac fulminis 
ad caelum uehiculo subleuatum, adorare ausi sunt, et quasi uiuens 


astrum colere. hinc enim et nomen post mortem eius Zoroaster, hoc 
est uiuum sidus, appellatum est ab his, qui post unam generationem 
graecae linguae loquela f uerant repleti. hoc denique exemplo etiam 
nunc multi eos qui fulmine obierint, sepulcris honoratos tamquam 
amicos Dei colunt. hie ergo cum quartadecima generatione coepisset, 
quintadecima defunctus est, in qua turris aedificata est, et linguae 
hominum multipliciter diuisae sunt. 

29 : Inter quos primus, magica nihilominus arte, quasi corusco ad 
eum delato, rex appellatur quidam Nemrod, quern et ipsum Graeci 
Ninum uocauerunt ; ex cuius nomine Niniue ciuitas uocabulum sum- 
sit, sic ergo diuersae et erraticae superstitiones ab arte magica 
initium sumpsere. 

Et eius, quem supra diximus indignatione daemonis, cui nimis 
molestus fuerat, conflagrasse, busti cineres tanquam fulminei ignis 
reliquias coUigentes hi, qui erant primitus decepti, deferunt ad 
Persas, ut ab eis tanquam diuinus e caelo lapsus ignis perpetuis 
conseruaretur excubiis, atque ut caelestis deus coleretur. 

Homilies (also spurious), IX. 4 f. (tom. ii. col. 244, ed. Migne): 
€K Tov •yci'ous Tourov yivcrai Tts Kara B(,a8o)(rjV /AayiKo, TrapetXij^us, ovo/AOTt 
Ne/SpooS, SxTTTCp yiyai ivavria tcu 6eiS (j>povuv iX.o/j.svoi, ov oi E\A.Tyv€s Zwpod- 
<TTpt]v TTpocrrjyopevaav. outos p,era, tov KaTaKXycr/xov /SacrtXcias 6p£)(dd's Kal 
fxiyas &v juayos tov vvv ^acnXevovTO's KaKOv tov iipocTKOwovvTa Kocr/jiov dorepa 
irpoi TTjV c^ avTov jSacriXetas Socnv /uayiKats ■^vayKa^c T£)(yaii. 6 Be are 8^ 
ap\<t>v uv Kal TOV Puxtftjiivov Trjv i^ovartav £X""'> 1^^'''' °pyV'^ '''o ^^s ;8acrtA,«'as 
TTpocre^ee TTvp, ti/a Trpds re tov 6pKii7p,ov f.vyvu>p,ovT)<jri, koX tov TrpdiTui'S dvay- 
KoxravTa n/Jitap-^cnjTai. 

Ik TavTTjS ovv Trjs ii ovpavov i^a/nat irea'orvcrrj'S aCTTpairij'; 6 p.dyo's dvaipeOeli 
Nc^SpolS, CK TOV cru/ijSavTOS irpdyp-aTO? ZupoacrTpijs p.iT0)voiJ.diT6r], Sia to ttjv 
TOV d(TTepos KaT avTov ^ficrav cv£^6^vat poiqv. ot 8e avotjToi tuiv totc dvOpixnrtav, 
<os &a Trfv ets Otov ipiXiav KcpavviS /jLCTaTre/jLcfiOeicrav t^v ij^vxrjv vop-iaavTcs, tov 
o-M/tttTos TO \d\liavov KaTOpviavTi's, tov pev Td<f)0v vaw iTip-qaav iv Ilepo-ats, 
ivOa ij ToS irupos KaTa<j)opa ykyovev, avTov Be (us 6ebv eOprjaKevtrav. tovtio 
TtS vTToBeiypjaTL Kal ot Xonrol eKeiire tovi Kepavv(S fli'ijcr/covras ws 6eo(j)i\eii 
OdTTTOvres vaois Tipwuiv, koL tS>v TeOvetoToiv iSioiv p,op(f>u>v itTTacnv dyaX/tara . . . 

Ilepcrat TrpSiTOL r^s ii ovpavov Tre(Tov(Tr)% do'Tpair^i Xapovre'; dvOpaKai Trj 
oiKeia Si€(t>v\aiav Tpo<l>rj Kal (as Oeov ovpdviov TrpoTip-qa-avTCi to irvp, ws 
vpwTOi Trpoo'KvvrjcravTe?, vir avTOv tov Trvpoi ■TrpSrij jSao-iXeia TeTipT^VTai " /xeO' 
ovi Ba/8uX(UVtot aiTo tov ck£i inipos S.v6po.Kas KXeipavTes Kal BiaaruMTavTei as 
TO eavTcov Kal Trpoo-KWijcravTCS Kal avTol aKoXovOwi e/SatriA.tvcrai'. 


§ 13. Titus Flavius Clemens Alexandrinus 

(Died between a.d. 211-218) 
Stromata I. (torn. i. col. 773, ed. Migne) : iir^XOe yap [sc. 6 AyjfioKpi- 

Tos '] ^ajBvXZvd re /cat Ilepo-tSa /cat A'lyvnTOV TOts te fjuxyLKol'S Kal Tots Upivm 
//.aO-qTCvtov. Zti)p<Da.<jTpr]v 8e tov pAyov Tov Hipcnijv 6 TLvOayopa^ iS'qXiarrev.^ 
jSi'^Xous aTroKpv<j>ovs rdvSpos TouSe oi Trjv IlpoSt/cov //.eTioi/Tcs aijoeciv av^^ovn 

Ibid. (torn. i. col. 868, ed. Migne) : wpoyvuo-et 8c xat IluSaycJpas o 

;U.«'yas irpouavdxev au, "AjSapLi re 6 'Yirep/Sopeos, /cat ApterTctas o n/jo/coi/- 
vi^crtos, 'En-t/xevtSr;s re 6 K.p'rjs ocTts eis ^TrdpTrjV d,<j>iKeTO, koI Z(iipoa,(TTpr]i 6 
MtJSos, 'E/x7re8oKX^s re 6 'A/cpayavTtvos, xat ^opp^iuiv 6 Aokcov. 

Ibid. Strom. V. (torn. ii. col. 156 f., ed. Migne): 6 8' avros h rm 

St/caTci) T^s IIoXtTetas 'Hpos ToC 'Ap/xevtov,^ to yei/os Jlap,cjivXov, /iC;U,v»;Tat, 
OS eo-Tt Zopoai(TTpr]'S* airos yovv 6 Zo/30ao'Tp?js ypa^a " TdSe avviypa^ev 
Zopodcrrprj'; 6 Appeviov, ro yeVos Ud^^vXos. ev TroXe/xto TcXtvTTyo'as ev 
"AtSg yev6p,evos iSdrjV Trapa Oeuiv. tov Br/ Zopod<TTpr]V tovtov 6 TlXdroiv S(uSe- 
KaroLov eirt T17 Trvpa K€ip,€vov dvajSi-Sivat Xe'yet. Tap^a /x€v ow rrjv avdcrTaaiv, 
rd^a Si e/cava aii'to"0"£Tat, ws 8ta, tSv 8bJSEKa ([a)8t<i)V 17 680s Tats xj/v)(iii 
yivtrai eis t^v dvdXrjijiLv. avTos 8e Kai eis T^v yiv£(Tiv <t>rj<n ttjv avrrp/ 
yiyvi<T$aL KadoSov. 

§ 14. Origenes 

(a.d. 185-254) 
Contra Celsum I. (torn. i. col. 689, ed. Migne): opa ow d p,^ 

avTiKpvi KaKOvpyZv e^e^SaXe \^SC. 6 KeXo-os] toS icaTaXdyov tS)v cro^wv Koi 
M<i)V(r£a, Aivov 8£ /cat Movo-atov /cat 'Opipia /cat tov ^€peKv8r]V koI tov Ilepcnjv 
Zwpodo'TprjV Kal XlvOayopav ^ijo-as Trcpi tSvSe StetXi^^evat, xat €s ;8i)8Xovs 
KaraTeOeiaOat to cavTSv Sdy/xaTO, /cat ■iri(j>vXdx9ai, avra /«.«XP' S^''/'"'' 

ContraHaeresesI. col. 3025 : Ato'Smpos 8e 6 'EptTpteus /cat *Api<rTo- 

ievo's 6 p.ova-LKO's <^-qin wpos ZapaTav tov XaXSatoj/ cXiyXvflci'at Xluflaydpav ' 
TOV Se iK0io-9aL avT<S Svo etvai Sltt dpxrj'; Tot's ovcriv aiTia, -iraTepa /cat p.r]Ttpa ' 
Kal TraTcpa p.€v </)Gs, jxrjTepa St ctkotos, tov Si ffxnToi p.ep7) Oepp,6v, ^^pov, 

1 Cf. Eusebius. » Vid. Plato, Bepub. p. 614 B. 

2 Quoted by Cyrill. adv. lul. iii. * Zwpiaarpts in Euseb. Prmp. Evang. 
(torn. i. col. 633, ed. Migne) where, XIII. 13, 30. / 

however, 4(^\u<Tev is read (cf. Win- 
dischmann, 2or. Stud. 268). 


Kovt/jOf, Ta}(v' ToS 8e o-kotovs tj/v)(p6v, iypov, ^apv, /JjoaSv. £k 8e toutojv 
TravTa Tov KOtrfjiov avvccrTavai, Ik OrjXuai Kal appevos ' eivai 8e tov Kocr/iov 
tj>v(nv Kara fjLovcriKrjv apfiovuiv, Sio ko.1 tov ijXtov TrotEicr^at rrjv weptoSov 
lva.pp.6vi.ov. iTtpl Se tS>v Ik y^s Kat K6crp.ov yivop,ivuiv raSe i^atrl Xcyetv tov 
Zaparav " 8vo 8ai/xovas eivat, tov /xev ovpaviov, tov 8e ^Odviov ' Kal tov plv 
xOovLov SivUvai T^v yevEo-iv £k t^s yijs, etvai Se vBuip' tov 8e ovpdviov irvp 
p.€Te)(0v TOV depos, Oep/xov tov il/v)(poru, 8to Kai tovtcov ovScv dvaipetv oiSt 
piatvtiv (j^rjol Trjv '/'^X'?'' ' '*'"''' V^-P ''■™'''<i ovcria tSv iravT(ov. Kudyuovs Se 
Xe'ycToi TrapayyeXXetv /A'^ icrOUiV, aiTiq. tov tov ZapaTrjv dpTjKivai KaTo. tyjv 
ap^v Kal (TvyKpuTiv tSv TrdvTWv (TVVio'Tapivrjs Trjs yrj's eTi Kai (Tvvaeuripp.ivrj'; 
yeviddai tov Kvapov. tovtov 8e TCK/xi^piov cjirjO'iv, e'i tis KaTap.a(Trja-dpevos 
Xeiov TOV Kvap.ov KaTaOdr] irpoi rjXiov )(p6vov Tivd — tovto yctp ivdeoi'; dvTtXi;- 
ij/tTai — irpo(T4>ip€iv dv6piiyjrivav yovcyu ohfirjv. (Ta(f>ia'Tepov 8e etvai Kal erepov 
irapdSayp.a Xc'yet, el dvdovvTOs tov Kvdpov Aa;8ovT£s tov Kvap.ov kox to dv^os 
airoS KoX KaTaOivTK as )(VTpav TavTrjv T£ KaTay^piaavTK £is y^v KaTopv^aiptv 
KOX per oXtyas rjpipai avaKaXvtj/aLpev, t8oi/;i£v (av) avTO ctSo'S l^ov to plv 
TrpSiTOv (OS aifryyvrp/ ywatKos, pera. Sf TalTa /caTavoov/tEvov TraiSi'ou Ktcj)aXr]V 

Ibid. V. (auct. inc.) Migne, vi. col. 3170 : Swa/xis 8£^ia £^ovo-id^£i 

KapirZv ■ TOVTOV ij dyvwo-ta £KdX.r]<Te M^va, ov KaT £iKOva EyeVovTO 'Bovpiya'S, 
'Oo-Tavijs, 'Ep/x,^s TpL(TpiyicTTo^, K.ovpiTrj'i, HiTotnpis, ZuiSdpiov, BTjpmads, 
A<7Tpdp\j/ov)(0';, Zcapoaa-TpL's. 

Ibid. VI. (col. 3228, Migne): km ZapaTas 5 Ilv^ayopou StSdo-KaXos 
ekoXei to p,£v £v TraTEpa, to Se Bvo pr/Tipa, 

§ 15. Diogenes Laertios 

(Flourished aboTit a.d. 210) 

Procem. 2 (ed. Cobet, Paris, 1862) : dTro 8£ tGv Mdywv, wv ap^ai 
Zcopodo-Tpijv TOV mpcrrjv, 'EppoSwpos pkv 6 IIXaTtoviKos £v Ttu irEpt paOrjpdTiDv 
tfirjai £is T^v Tpotas dXwo'iv etij ycyovevai TrevTaKLa'^iXia'^ Hdv^os 8£ o AvSos 
£is T^v '3,ip^au Sidfiao'iv a.Tro tov Zu>podiTTpov e^aKLcr)([ ^rjcri, Kai per avTov 
yeyovevai ttoXXous Ttvas MdyoDS KaTa StaSo^'^v, 'Oo-Tavas Kai 'A(rTpap^v)(ov^ 
Kol To)/3pvai Kal na^dras, /xE^pt t^s tGv IlEpo-Mv vtt 'AXt^dvSpov kotoXvo-eos. 

Ibid. 6: t^v 8e yorjTiKrjv payciav ovk Eyvwo-av \^SC. oi Mdyoi], ^rjcrlv 
' ApKTTOTeXrji iv T<S MaytKco Kai AEt'vtov £V Trj TrepTTTrj TO>v to'ToptSv " os Kat 
pcOepprjvcvoptvov <l>rj(TL tov Z(apod(rTpr]V do'TpoOvTTjv Etvat ■ <}>rjO'l Si touto 

Kat O 'Ep/to8(0pOS. 'AptO-TOTEXlJS 8' £V TIU TTpUITm TTCpl <f)lXo<TO<j)Mi Kol TTpifT- 

1 Two MSS., f^aKiaxi^ia. 


^vrepovs elvM tuiv AlyvTrritov ' koI Svo Kar avTovi eirai apX"-''} ayaOov 
SaifJLOva Kal kukov Baifi,ova, Koi T<S /jxv ovofJLa elvM Zei)s km lipo/tdo-Sijs, t<S 
Se 'AiStjs koX 'Apafxano^. <l>r](n 8e tovto koi Ep/iiTTros iv T(S 7rpuiT<a Trcpl 
Maycov KOI EuSo^os ev rrj IleptoSa) Koi ®eo7ro/Airos iv rrj oySog tSv <&jXi7r- 
ttikSiv, OS Kal dva/3iaJcreo-0at Kara tows Mayous <j>r](Tl Tous avOputirovi Km. 
icrea-Oai aOavdrov;, Kal Ta ovTa Tais avruiv kinK\ri(Tt<n SiajMevav. ravTa 8e 
Kol Ei)8i;/xos o 'PoStos l(TTOpei. 'EKaTatos Se Kal yevrjTovi tovs ^eovs eli/ai 
Kar' avTows. K.Xiap^O's Se 6 SoXeiis ev tcS Trepl TratSetas Kat Tois Tviji,vo(to- 
(jlto'Tas aTToydvous tivat Toiv Mayoiv <^7jcrtv " Iwot St Kal toiis lovSatovs e/c 
TouTO)v elvai. 

§ 16. Arnobius 

("Wrote atout a.d. 295) 

Adv. Gentes I. 5 (col. 727 f., ed. Migne) : ut inter Assyrios 
et Bactrianos, Nino quondam Zoroastreque ductoribus, non tantum 
ferro dimicaretur et uiribus, uerum etiam Magieis et Chaldaeorum 
ex reconditis disciplinis, inuidia nostra haec fuit ? 

Ibid. I. 52 (col. 788 ff.) : Age nune, ueniat quis super igneam 
zonam, magus interiore ab orbe Zoroastres, Hermippo ut assentiamur 
auctori. Bactrianus et ille conueniat, cuius Ctesias res gestas histo- 
riarum exponit in primo, Armenius Hosthanis ^ nepos, etc. 

§ 17. Porphurios 

(a.d. 233 to about a.d. 304) 

Vit. Pythagorae 12: ey re 'ApajSLO. t<S ^amXu <Tvvrjv [6 Ilv^ayd- 
pas] iv T£ Ba^iiXfivt tois t oAXots XaXSaiots crwcyeveTO Kal ttjoos ZajSpaTov 
a<t>tKCTO, Trap' ov Kal aKa6ap6-q to, tov irporipov fiiov Xij/j.aTa Kal iSiSd^d'q 
acji' ov ayvevav TrpoarjKti rots CTTrovSatbts, tov tc irepl c^wtras Xdyov ijKovo-e Kal 
nVes ai tSv oAoji' apx<x^- ^k yo.p ttjs Trepl ravra to, tdvrj ^Xavjjs o Ilu^ayojoas 
TO ■TrXua'Tov Trj's <70<^tas ivenopevfraTO. 

De antro nympharum 6: owtw koX Tlepa-oi tyjv eis Karco KaOoSov 
tS>v tj/v)(S)v Kal TraXtv efoSov p,vcrTayo>yovvT€^ TcXovcri tov /JLvuTrjV, iwovo/JLo.- 
<ravTes cnrrjXaiov tottov ' irpuiTa p,€v us <\>-r)(nv EuySouXos, ZuipodcrTporu avT0(j>vii 
(TTTT^Xaiov iv Tois ttXtjctlov opC(Ti Trjs Ileptn'Sos avOrjpbv Kal Tn^yas eX"" °-Vt^- 
puxravToq £ts nfir/v tov wavTUiv irotr/Tov /cat irarpos lAiOpov, eiKwa (jiipovTOi 
avT(0 TOV (nr-qXaiov tov Koafiov, ov 6 M.Wpa'S iSrjp.iovpyrjo'e, tZv 8e tVTOS 
Kara arvpj/j.eTpovs a.^^o<TTa,a^£t,^ o'v/j,/3oXa (fiepovTuiv tS>v KotTii,iKOiv (TTOt,)(eiuiV 
Kal KXi/jLaTiDV ' p^To. Se tovtov Ziopodo'Tprjv xpar'^cravTos Kal Trapa rois aXXois 
1 MSS. Zostriani, of. Windischmann, Zor. Stud. 289. 


St* avrptav k<u cnrriXaLav eir' ovv avTO<l>vwv citc x"/''°'''°"?''"'' '''"■'' TtXeT^is 

De Vita Plotini § 16: yeyovam 8e Kar avrov rZv XpurnavZv woX- 
Xol ju,£v Kol aXXoi, alperiKol Sk e/c T^s iraXatSs <j>tXo(70(f>iai avrjyiifvoL oi 
TTcpi 'A8e'\(^tov (cai 'AkvXlvov, ot Ta 'AXelavSpov ToS At)3uos /cat 4>tXoK(0|U,ov 
Kat ArnJLOCTTpdTOv KOI AvSoC crvyypa/i/iaTa 7rA.etcrTa K£KTr]p,evoi, airoKaXv\l/a% 
re Trpoi^EjOOVTes ZiopodcrTpov koI ZwoTptavot) Kat NtKO^eou xat AAAoyevous 
Kat Mctrou Kat a\Ao)v rotovrcov jroWoiis iirjTrdrwv koI avrol 7jTro.T7ip.ivoi, ojs 
8^ To5 nXaTO)vos ets to ^dOoi ttJ's vorjT^i ovtriai ov TrcXairavTos. o6ev 
avTos /xev ttoXXovs eXe'y^^ows 7rotoi5jU,£vos €1/ Tats awcnxTLais, ypdij/ai 8e Kat 
^iPXiov, oirep Trpoi Tous yvoHTTtKovs iTr£ypdtj/ap,£v, T/p-iv to, Xoma Kptvuv 
KaTaXiXomev. 'Ap.eXioi Se axpi TCa-aapdKovra l3ij3Xiuiv ■7rpoKE)(u>p7jKe tTjOos 
TO ZoiaTpiavov ^ijSXCov dvTiypdfjxmi. IIop</)u/otos Se eyo) Trpos ro Zmpodo'Tpov 
(rv)(yovs irejrouqpjo.i lXiy)(ovi, ottux; voOov re Kat viov to jiipXiov wapaSuKvv's, 
■!re7rXaa-p,4vov re viro Tutv ttjv aipecnv avdTTjO-a.p.h'ttiv ets 8d|av ToS etvat rov 
iraXmov ZuipoaxTTpov to, Soy/xara, o avTot elXovTo Trpecr^Sevetv. 

§ 18. Eusebios 

(About A.D. 264-340) 

This passage is usually assigned to Philo Byblius (flor. circ. a.d. 
125), Fragm. 9, apud Euseb. Praep. Evang. I. 10 (torn. iii. 
col. 88, ed. Migne) : Kat ZtupoacrTpT/s 8e 6 p.dyoi iv Trj lepa arwaymyy tZv 
TlepcnKW <j>rja-i. Kara Xeiiv ' 'O Se 6eos eori KCi^aX'^v i^wv tepaKos. ovtos 
icTTLv 6 TrpSros atfiOapTO^, dt'Stos, dyei/vijTos, dp.eprj'S, di/OftotoroTos, ijftopfos 
iravTos KaXov, d8a)po8oKijTos, dya^oli' dya^coraTos, <ftpovip.ij}v ^povip.u>Ta.TOi ' 
ecTTt h\ Kcu, iraT-qp evvop,!a<s Kat SiKaiocrvvrj'S, avToStSaKTOS, <^iKrtKOs, Kat tcXeios, 
Kat (TOGO'S, Kat lepov <j>va-iKov p,6voi evpcrijs. to. Se aira Kat 'OcTTaviys ^ijcri 
Trept avTOv iv Trj £7rtypa<^op.evj; OKTaTeij;)^a). 

Ibid. X. 9, 10 (col. 805 seq., ed. Migne): ou NtVos iirwwp.o's 
TToXis, ■^ Ntvew Trap' 'EySpat'ots'Tai, Ka6 ov ZiapoddTprjs 6 p,ayos 
BaKTptW ey3acri\eu(re. Ntvou Se yvvrj Kat 8taSo;)(os T^s ySacrtXetas Sep,tpap,ts ' 
«o(rT' etrat tov A/Jpaa/u KaTo. toutous. 

Eusebius Chron. II. 35, ed. Aucher (to year 9 of Abraham): 
Zoroastres magus rex Bactrianorum clarus habetur : aduersum quem 
Ninus dimicauit. 

1 Thus Nietzsche in his ' Also sprach Zarathustra ' makes the Sage dwell in a 
cave, with a serpent and an eagle as his faithful companions. 


§ 19. C. lul. Solinus Polyhistor 

(a.d. Third or Fourtli Century) 

I. Nascentium uox prima uagitus est: laetitiae enim sensus 
differtur in quadrigesimum diem, itaque unum nouimus eadem 
hora risisse, qua erat natus, scilicet Zoroastrem, mox optimarum 
artium peritissimum. 

§ 20. Basilios Megas 

(A.D. 329-379) 

Epist. CCLVIII. (tom. iv. col. 953, ed. Migne): ras 8e £k to5 
'APpaa/j. yevaXoytas ovStis ij/aTi/ /xej^t tov irapovros Ttav ftaywv ijj.vdoK6y7](rev • 
aXXh. Zapovdv rtva eavTois dpxoyov tov yivovi iTn<lirjp,L^ovfn. 

§ 21. Epiphanios of Constantia 

(a.d. 298-403) 

Adv. Haereses, Lib. I. Tom. I. 6 (tom. i. col. 185 seq., ed. 
Migne) : Ne/3/oa)9 yap ^atriXcm vibi tov Xovs totv AiftWos, i^ ov 'Aoro-ovp 
ytyevvTjTai. tovtov ■^ /Sao-tXeia iv 'Ope^ ycyevvrjTai, koI iv Ap<^aX, Kal 
XaXavvj;. KTiZ,a Sc koX ttjv ®«pas /cat ttjv ©o^sX koX AoySov iv tq Ko'cropiuni 
X<i>pa- TOVTOV <j>a(ri iraiSes EXXtJvojv etvat tov ZmpodcrTpTjv, os irpotro) 
^wp^cras ETTt Ta dvaTokiKo, p^ipr] oikktt^s yiveraj, Sa.KTpo)v. ivTtvdev to, 
Kara t^v y^v Trapdvop.a Siavevip,yjTai. cc^eupeTjys yap odtos yeyevajTai KaK^s 
SiSa^^)}? dcTTpoXoytas xat juayetas, ws Tives <^acrt irepi tovtov tov ZaipodcrTpov. 
TrXrjV tos ij aKpijScta irepii^u tov ^ePpind tov yiyavTO's oiiTOS ^v 6 ;(povos. 
oi iroXv 8e dXXijXwi' T<S Xp6v<o Sica-Ti^Kacnv d/JLtjuo, o re Ne/JpwS Kot 6 

§ 22. Ammianus Marcellinus 

(About 330-400) 

XXIII. 6, 32-34 : magiam opinionum insignium auctor amplis- 
simus Plato machagistiam esse uerbo mystico docet, diuinorum 
incoruptissimum cultum, cuius scientiae saeculis priscis multa ex 
Chaldaeorum arcanis Bactrianus addidit Zoroastres, delude Hystaspes 
rex prudentissimus Darei pater, qui cum superioris Indiae secreta 
fidentius penetraret, ad nemorosam quandam uenerat solitudinem, 

' The same statement is later repeated by Prokopios of Gaza, see below, § S3. 


cuius tranquillis silentiis praecelsa Bracmanorum ingenia potiuntur, 
eorumque monitu rationes mundani motus et siderum purosque 
sacrorum ritus quantum colligere potuit eruditus, ex his quae didicit, 
aliqua sensibus magorum infudit, quae illi cum discipliuis praesen- 
tiendi futura per suam quisque progeniem posteris aetatibus tradunt. 
ex eo per saecula multa ad praesens una eademque prosapia multi- 
tude creata deorum cultibus dedicatur. feruntque, si iustum est 
credi, etiam ignem caelitus lapsum apud se sempiternis f oculis custo- 
diri, cuius portionem exiguam ut f austam praeisse quondam Asiaticis 
regibus dicunt. 

§ 23. Marius Victorinus Afer 

(About A.D. 350) 

Ad lustinum Manicliaeum (col. 1003, ed. Migne): lamuidisti- 
ne ergo quot Mania, Zoradis, aut Buddas haec docendo deceperint? 

§ 24. Hieronymus 

(a.d. 331-420) 

Epist. 132 (tom. i. col. 1153, ed. Migne): In Hispania Agape 
Elpidium, mulier uirum, caecum caeca duxit in foueam, suceesso- 
remque qui Priscillianum habuit, Zoroastris magi studiosissimum, 
et ex mago episcopum, cui iuncta Galla non gente sed nomine, 
germanam hue illucque currentem alterius et uicinae haereseoa 
reliquit haeredem. 

§ 25. lohannes Chrustostomos 

(a.d. 347-407) 

Lib. de S. Babyla contra lulianum et Gentiles (tom. 
ii. col. 536, ed. Migne) : ei^re yap fwi, Slot Tt Tov ZojpoaaTprjV Ikuvov koX 
Tov Zd/JLok^iv ovSe i^ di/o/taros Icracnv oi ttoWoi, fiaXXov Se ouSe Ttves TrXrjv 
oXtyoiv Ttvu>v ; ap ov)( on irXdcrixaTa rjv ra irept eKUvoiv XcyofJieva awavTa ; 
KairoL yi KaKcivoi Kal ot to. tKuvav (rvvSevTcs Seivol yevicrOai Xiyovrai, 61 p.\v 
yorjTCiav eipeiv Kal ipydcracrOai, ol 8e crvcrKidcrai tf/^vSoi ry tS>v Xoyoyv TriOavo- 
TijTC. dXXa irdvTa fidrrjv yiverai Kal eiK^, orav rj tS>v Xiyojiivtov VTroOcaii 
iradpa. xat ij/evSr]': ovcra tvxq, uxnrep otv, oTav Icrxvpa. Kal oXt/^ijs, aTravra irdXiv 
imTtjv yti/£Tat Kal elKrj to, Trpbi dvarponrjv eirtvoov/^Eva Trapb. tS>v i)(9pS>v ■ 
oiSe/it'as yap Seirai jSoij^etas ■^ t^s dXij^eias i<T\vs. 


§ 26. Aurelius Prudentius Clemens 

(a.d. 348 to about a.d. 410 1) 

Apotheosis, 492 ff.: 

ecquis alummis 
Chrismatis inscripto signaret tempora ligno ; 
Qui Zoroastraeos turbasset fronte susurros. 

§ 27. Paulus Orosius 

(Wrote about a.d. 417) 

Hist. I. 4 (col. 700, ed. Migne): Nouissime Zoroastrem Bactria- 
norum regem, eundemque magicae (ut ferunt) artis repertorem, pugna 
oppression [sc. Mnus] interfecit.^ 

The passage contains some account also of Semiramis as ■well as 
of Ninus. 

§ 28. Aurelius Augustinus 

(a.d. 354-430) 

De Civ. Dei, XXI. 14 (torn. vii. col. 728, ed. Migne): Solum 
quando natus est ferunt risisse Zoroastrem, nee ei boni aUquid 
monstrosus risus iUe portendit. nam magicarum artium fuisse 
perhibetur inuentor; quae quidem illi nee ad praesentis uitae 
uanafu felicitatem contra suos inimicos prodesse potuerunt. a 
Nino quippe rege Assyriorum, cum esset ipse Bactrianorum, bello 
superatus est. 

§ 29. Eurillos Alexandrinos 

(About a.d. 376-444) 

Contra lulian. III. (torn. ix. col. 633, ed. Migne) : on /ikv o5v oE 
Mayot TLepaiKov elcri ycvos, ipovm irov 7ravT<Ds. ZiapoacTpriv yc ixrjv oiSeis 
airaWd^cie \oyos Tov rais /nayi/cats ivi(r)(rj(r6ai, Te)(yati, ov Sr/ Kal iravapKTTOV 
^rjXwTYjv HvOayopav ^acriv, (is koX /St/8Aovs dTropprJTOvi Trap' avrov ctwte- 
6ufi.iva.% av)(^<Ta{ Ttvas. 

1 Quoted also by Gregory of Tours, 2 Praised by Ekkehard Urangiensis, 

Miraculor. lib. 1. cap. 41 (col. 743, col. 505, ed. Migne (vol. 154). 
ed. Migne). 


§ 30. Theodoretos of Cyrus 

(About A.D. 387-4-57) 
Graecarum Aff ectionum Curatio, IX. de legibus (torn. 

iv. col. 1045, ed. Migne) : aX\a Kara tovis ZapaSou TToXai Ilcpcral 5roXtTevo- 
fLtvoi vojuovs, KoX firiTpaxn koX a8eX<jxu's dSetiis nal /jlIvtol koI Ovyarpatri 
fi.iyvviJi.cvoi, Kai ivvofjiov rriv irapavo/Atav vojjLi^ovTe's, ETreiS^ t^s tSiv aXiioiv 
vofwOemas iTrrJKOvtrav, tous ju.ti' ZapaSou vo/nous ors irapavo/Jiiav CTraTiycrev, 
TTjv cvayyeXiKrjv 8e <TO><j)po<Tvvr]V ^yaTTijcrav. Kal kvctI koI oioovois tods 
veKpovi -rpoTiOivM Trap' Ikuvov /xcp-aOriKOTei, vvv tovto Spav ot irtoTev- 
(ravres ovK avi)(OVTai, dAXct Tg yg KaraKprnrTovcn, Kal tu>v tovto opav d;rayo- 
ptvovToiv ov <j)pcvT^ov(Ti v6p.u>v, oi)8e irecjipiKacn ttjv tS)V koXol^ovtoiv 

§ 31. Claudianus Mamertus 

(Wrote about a.d. 470) 

De statu animae, II. 8 (col. 750, ed. Migne): Quid ego nunc 
Zoroastri, quid Brachmanum ex India, quid Anacharsis e Scythia, 
quid uero Catonum, quid M. Ciceronis, quid Crysippi, qui ab ipso 
paene principio sui operis animo dominandi ius tribuit, corpori 
legem seruitutis imponit, in def ensionem ueri sententias adf eram ? 

§ 32. lohannes Laurentios Ludos 

(Born about a.d. 490) 

De Men sib us, II. 3 (p. 14, ed. Bonnenn.): [on oi irept Zcapo- 
atTTp-qv Koj. "YcTTao'Trijv XaXSaiot Koi AiyvTTTioi otto tov apidixov tZv 7r\a- 
vrjTusv iv ey88o/id8t Tcts ijp,€pas aviXajSov, Kal ttjv /xev TrpotTtjv ij/icpav fLiav, 
us Kal 01 IlD^ayopeioi, KoX.ovo'iv €k Trji juovaSos, on //.oi/jy Kal aKOLviavrjTos 
Tais aXAais.J 

Ibid. II. 5 (p. 16, ed. Bonnenn.) : TocravTa p.€v ircpl t^s juiSs, -^v <us 

e<l>r]v TrpiaTrjV to 7rX.rj0o^ KaX.ei, rjv KaT aio'Orja'Lv TjXliO aviOtVTO, ra/jiLa IJ.€V 
TOV iravToi alcrOriTOv <^<oto's, St' ou Oep/xaiva T£ a/ta Kal ripifia ^-qpalva to. 
(TixtpAxTa, evl tZv irXayi/JTOiv Kaff EXXt^vos, Kav (1 ZitapoaxrTprj'i avTov irpo 
Tuiv awXavuiv TaTTy. 

Ibid. De Ostentis, 2 (p. 274, ed. Bonnenn.): app,o'8ioi/ 81 tlvai 
vo/xi^u) T<S Trepi tS)v toiovtwv ypa.4>av cOeXovTi, TroOev re i) tSiv toiovtwv 
KaTaXijij/K ^p^"-^" ^'yav, Kal o6'v eo'XE Tas d^op/^as, Kal oircos £7ri too'ovtov 


^p^yixeev (^ xat avTous, £t 6e/i" £i5r£iv, AiyvTrTtovs xmipPaXuv. roirtov 
v«P «^. M^Ta Za>pod.a-Tpr]V tov ttoXvv, IleTo'o-tpts rots «8tK0is ra '" ve"' SiwAe'^^j 
iroXXa /xci' KaT* awoV irapaSovvai /Sid^cTai, oi 7ra°'' *^ ""'"'StSmo-t TaSra, 
;u,ovois 8e Tois Kafl' avTov, /ioXXov 8e ocroi koi o"™" Trpos crTo;(atr/*oiis etti- 

§ 33. Prokopios of Gaza 

(Flourislied about a.d. 500) 

Comment, in Genesin [c. XL] (torn. i. col. 312, ed. Migne): 
TOV 'Acrcrovp <j)a(nv oi "EWiyves eivat tov 7i<opoa.iTTp-qv, os Trpocrw p^wp^cras 
£7rt Ta dvaToXtKct p-epr] oikictt^s yivcTai. ^duTpoiv} outos (^acriv i^cvpiv 
aXTTpokoyuiv ' irXrjv (os rj aKpc^eia Tm Ne^/jcbS ToS yiyavTOi Treptep^n, 
o^Tos i^v o Kpovos ■ ov TToXi) Se dXXi^Xoiv t<S xP°^V ^'■^<''T'^i^a<n JffejSpdS 
T€ Kol Zwpoda-Tprj'; ' akXoi Se tov 'Ap<j>aia.S <^a(rti' evpi^Kevai tyjv dsTTpo- 

§ 34. Ainaias of Gaza 

(About A.D. 500) 

Theophrastus, 77: kultoi koL nXartov t<3 (twimlti tov 'Apixeviov 
i^ "AiSov Trpos Tovi ^ZvTa^ avdya. 6 Si Zmpoaorpijs TrpoXiyei (os lorat 
iroTe p^pdvos iv <a iravTOiv ve.Kpu>v avatTTavi^ idTOA.. oiSei' o ©edjro/iTTOS o 
\iyu) KoX Tois oAXovs avrds iKBiSdcTKCi. 

§ 35. Agathias Scholastikos 

(About A.D. 536-582) 

Hist. II. 24 (col. 1381 f., ed. Migne): Uepa-aK 8e toTs vvv ra p.h 
TTpoTcpa iOtj (T)(eS6v ri airavTa TrapUTOJ. a.p.i\a Kai avaTCTpaTTTai, dXXoibis Si 
TLo-i Kal olov vevodevixevois xP'^vtm vop.i/ioi'S, Ik tZv Ziopoda-Tpov tov 'OppAKT- 
8e(i)S SiSay p-driav KaTaKk-qdivTK. outos Se o ZiopdacTTpos ^ ^toi Za.pdSrq'S — 
SiTTT) yap eir airm ij eirwvp.ia. — otrr/viKa ftcv ■^Kp.acrev tyjv Apxv^ ''''' Tovi 
vofjLOv; Wero, ovk ive-CTTi. aa<^S)^ SiayvStvai. Hepcrai Se avTov ot vvv ejri 
'Ya-TdcTTrew, ovto) Si; ti dirXm^ <^a.(n yeyovlvai, (is Xiinv dp.<^iyvoti(Tdai. koX ovk 
etvat paOeiv, iroTepov Aapeiov TraTrjp eiTe Kai aXXos outos inr^p^ev 'YcrTatrin;!. 
e^ oTo) S av Kai ■qvBr)(Ti )(p6v(o, v^riyeTrji avTois exeivos Kai KaSijyep.tov T^s 
payiKrjs yeyovev dyio-Tcias, Kat airas 8^ ras wpoTcpa^ lepovyt'as d/x.eii/'as, 
7rap,/ttyeis nvas Kai TroiKtXas ivtOriKC So^as. to /xcv yap TroXatov At'a Te xai 

1 For this statement, see Epiphanies ^ Vulg. Zap6aSos; E. ZopSaffrpos. 

of Constantia, above, § 21. 


Kjodi/ov Koj. TOuTOus 8^ arravTas Tous ttap 'EWijcrt OpvWoujxevovi iTifiiav 
Ocovi; ttA.'^v ye oTt 8^ avToiis ij irpotnjyOjOto oi^ o/iot<os eo-co^ero. dAAa B^A.ov 
/xev Tov Ato. Tv;^oi', SoivStjv te tov 'HpaxXea, Kol 'AvatViSa T^v A<f>poSLTrjv, 
Kol oXXftis Toirs dWoDs iKoXovv, (Ss irov ^rip<a(r(TiS re T(o Ba;8vA.ft)vto) xai 
A^tjvokXci Kat %ip.d.Kta, toTs Ta dpx<*"''''i'''<'' '''<"''' 'Acrtrupt'toi' T£ (cat MtJScoi/ 
dvaypai/'a/xerots, 'urroprjrai. vvv 8c <I)s Ta ttoWo. Tots xaXov/ievois Mavixiito'S 
ivp-tftepovrai, etrderov Svo ras irpuras ijyetcr^at dp^as Kat t^v //.ev ayaOi^v re 
ajjux Kol TO. KoXXurra tS>v ovtu>v diroKDiJtracrav, evavrt'ojs 8e /car' ap.<^u> f\ovtTav 
T'qv €T€pav. ovofLwra Te airats tirdyoutn j8ap/3ap(Ka xai tij 0"<^£Tep^ yXuTTr; 
■n-eiroiyifjiiva. tov fiiv yap ayaOov, etre 6eov etre i-qiuovpyov, 'OpjJLUr^aTrjv 
a.TTOKaXofu(TLv, 'A.pipAv'q'i 8e ovofLo. r<S /caKtaro) Ka6 oXeOpm. koprrjv re TratrSi' 
jnet^ova T^v roiv KaKuiv Xeyop-ein/jv ava.ip£(nv eKTeXovtnv, iv y tGv te kpwe.Tii>v 
irXeio'Ta koi T(UV dXXwv ^<u(i)i' biroaa aypia Kat eprjiiovoiia KaTa/CTCtVovTes, 
ToT? judyots ■n-pcxra.yovcriv, wnrep es ejrtSei^ti/ eicre/Setas. ravTij yap otovrai 
T(3 juev dya^o) Ki-)(a.pi(Tji.iva BiaTTOVtiirOai, dviai' Se Kat XvpaivitrOai tov 'Kpifiavriv, 
yepatpoucrt 8e cs to p-aXuTTa to vSmp, (us jUijSe Ta TrpotTtoira avT(S ivavovi- 
^ecrOai, prjTe aXXtii<i kiriOiyyavtiv oTt p.'^ iroTov te CKart Kat t^s tu)v (jyvTuiV 

§ 36. Scholastikos Kassianos Bassos 

(a.d. Sixth Century) 

Praef. in lib. I.: to, 8ta(^dpots tGi/ TraXaiSi/ irEpt te yEcopytas Kat ewIjue- 
Xeias ijiVTtav Kat (Tiropip.iav kol irepiov iroXXSv )(p7)(rip,iiiv aprjpiva o"uXXe^as 
Eis £>', TouTt TO /StySXt'ov awTe'^EtKa. crwetXeKTat Sc ek TUiv ^XuipevTivav 
Kat OvLvSavioiviov Kat AvaToXiOV Kal BijpouTiov Kat Atoi^dvows Kat Aeovtivoi; 
Kat TapavTtVou Kat Arjp,OKp(Tov Kat A<^ptKavoB TrapaSo^aiv Kal Tlap.<j>lXov Kat 
'AttouXijiov Kat Bdpwvos Kat 7iu>poa.(TT pov Kal ^povToivoi Kal Ha^dpou Kal 
AapijyepovTos Kat AtSwpou Kat S«)Ttoi/os Kat tSv Kdi/tiXicov. 

Geoponica, 11. 18. 11: Zmpodo'Tpijs 8e Xiya, iirl iviavTov eva /ir/ 
dXyeti' Tois 64>6aXp.ovs, tov iv Trpwrots iSovTa etti tow <^vtoS p.ep.vKViai 
KoXvKas, Kat TpioTV i^ avTSiv diro/tafd/xEvov Ta op,p,aTa, Kal inl tov <J)VTov 
Tot pdSa KaTaXiTTOi/ra. 

Ibid. 13. 9. 10: Zwpodo-Tpjjs <^r)(Ti, t^s 'OpiSaKOi to orTrip/jLa peTa otvou 
iro^EV taTat Toiis CTKopTrtoSj^KTOvs. 

Geoponica (continued): The following rubrics of "Zoroaster" 
will sufficiently indicate the character of the lore ascribed to him, 
without the necessity of presentation of the texts of the chapters 
under them. 

1 Vulg. 'OpiwrSiaTriv. 


I. 7 : oTt dvayKatov itiTiv dSivai, ttote ij <re\i;v»7 y6V'eTat wep y^v, Trort 
8e vTo T^v. Z(opod(TTpov. (31 sections, pp. 11-16, ed. Beckh.) 

I. 8 : TTEpi TTJi Tov Kwos CTTtToX^s Kol T^s TTpoyvuKTetDi tUv i^ avT^s 
(Tvfi,paiv6vT<i>v. TOV avTov. (13 sections, pp. 15-17.) 

I. 10 : <Tr][xeiw(n^ tZv dirortXov/iei'UJV Ik r^s TrpuiTrj'S Ppovrrj^ koS' €Ka.<TTOv 
^TOi, jii£Ta TTjv TOV KWOS iiriTo\-^v. Zuipoda-Tpov. (13 sections, pp. 19 seq.) 

I. 12 : Boi8eKaeTr]pli toD Aids, xat ocra aTroTcXet 77ept7roXeij(i)j/ tovs ScoSexa 
OIK0U9 TOV ^(aSiaKOv kvkXov. Zwpod(TTpov. (40 sections, pp. 21—28.) 

II. 15 : TrpoyvtinTTiKov, wcttc elSevai, irota Tuij' {Tnapoixevoiv yeir^crovTai 
eiOaX^. ZapodcTTpov. (3 sections, p. 55.) 

V. 46 : £v woKp oiKco ovCTiys T^s crtXi^vT^s XP^ rpvyav, Kal otl Xrjyovutj^ 
avTYji; Kal vTToyeCov oScrtji tov TpvyrjTov Set ttoluv. Ziapod(TTpov. (1 section, 
p. 164.) 

VII. 5 : TTcpl dvw'^ccos irCOoiv, Kal ti 'xprj TrapatjivXdrTecrOaL tiS KaipiS t^s 
TovTwv dvot^Eojs. Zwpoda-Tpov. (3 sections, pp. 190 seq.) 

VII. 6 : Trepl ft.era.yyi,(Tfx.ov o'ivov, Kal TroTe. )(prj p,CTavTXuv Toil's oivous, 
Kal OTL Sia(l>opav €p(a 6 iv t<S avT<S Tri6<o e/j.^e^Xrjp.evoi olvos. TOv avTOV. 

(11 sections, pp. 191 seq.) 

VII. 11 : COCTTE VTTO /SpOVTljlV Kol dcTTpaiTUtV pit) TpiTr£(r6al TOVi OlI/ODS. 

Ziopoda-Tpov. (1 section, p. 195.) 

X. 83 : SivSpov OKapTTOV Kap'7ro<j>opeiv. Z(opod(rTpov. (3 sections, p. 319.) 

XIII. 16 : Trepl KavOapiSuiv. ZwpoddTpov. (4 sections, p. 403.) 

XV. 1 : Trepl <J3vo'ikS>v (rv/x'TraOeiStv Kal avrnraOuSiv. ZmpodfTTpov. (35 
sections, pp. 432-436.) 

§ 37. Gregorius Turonensis 

(a.d. 538-593) 

Hist. Franco r. 1. 5 (col. 164 seq., ed. Migne): Primogenitus 
uero Cham, Chus. hie fuit totius artis magicae imbuente diabolo et 
primus idololatriae adinuentor. hie primus statuunculam adoran- 
dam diaboli instigatione constituit : qui et Stellas et ignem de coelo 
cadere falsa uirtute hominibus ostentebat. hie ad Persas transiit. 
hunc Persae uocitauere Zoroastrem, id est uiuentem stellam. ab hoc 
etiam ignem adorare consueti, ipsum diuinitus igne consumptum nt 
deum colunt. 


§ 38. Isidorus 

(About A.D. 570-636) 

Etymol. 5. 39 (torn. iii. col. 224, ed. Migne): Thara, an. lxx, 
genuit Abraham. Zoroastes magicam reperit. 

Ibid. 8. 9 (col. 310), III. M. CLXXXIV.: Magorum primus 
Zoroastes rex Bactrianorum, quem Ninus rex Assyriorum praelio 
interfecit, de quo Aristoteles scribit quod uicies centum millia 
uersuum ab ipso condita indiciis uoluminum eius declarentur. 

Chron. (torn. v. col. 1024, ed. Migne) : Hac aetata magica ars 
in Perside a Zoroaste Bactrianorum rege reperta. a Nino rege 

§ 39. Chronicon Paschale or Chron. Alezandrinum 

(Last Date a.d. 629 1) 

Chron. Paschale (col. 148 seq., ed. Migne; I. p. 67, ed. 
Bonnenn.) : koL reXeuTa o Kpovos. 6 Sc NiVos iTriKpaTrji yevo/jievoi T^s 
'Aoronipias KTL^a t^i/ Ntveu^ TrdXtv Acrcruptots, koI /SacnXeva wpoJTOs iv avrrj 
i\(i>v Trjv SefitpajUtv T^v Koi 'Peav ttjv eavToC ixrjTepa Kal yvvaiKa fXtO' lavTOv. 

i^ avTov ovv ToS yivovs iyewtjOr) Kal 6 Ztopoao-rpos ^ 6 dcrpoi/o/xos TlipcrStv 
6 TTcpi/SoTjTos, oo-Tis jxiWrnv rekcvTav rivxero vtto irvpoi avaXoiOrjvai ovpaviov, 
eiTribv TOis Ilepo-ais on iav Kavtrg p.e ro irvp, ix tS>v Kaiop,ivu>v p,ov offTftov 
iirdpare Kal <j>vXAiaTe, Kal ovK'a to ^a<ri\aov tK t^s ip-Zv x<>>p<»s o<rov 
fffiovav ^vXaTTiTC TO, ip,a, ocrrea. Kal eii^dp.cvo'i rbv 'Qpiiava otto Trvpos 
aipCov d.vrjXu)6r]. Kal CTrotijcav ot IlEpa'ai Kadu)s etvev awois Kal l^ouort 
<^v\aTTovT£S TO Xeti/'ttvoi' avTOv Te<j>poi6tv lojs vvv. 

The same story is found in almost the same ■words, or with no 
material addition, in the works of lohan. Malalas (a.d. sixth century) 
(col. 84, ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. torn. 121 ; p. 18, ed. Bonnenn.) ; Geor- 
gios Hamartolos (d. circ. a.d. 1468), Chron. (col. 56, ed. Migne, Patro- 
log. Gr. torn. 110). See, also, Georgios Kedrenos (end of eleventh 
century a.d.), who also adds (Historiarum Compendium, 
col. 57, ed. Migne, Patrolog. Gr. torn. 121 ; p. 29 f ., ed. Bonnenn.) : 
TO, Xeii/'ava auToS 8io Tiprjs a^ov ot IXcpcrai t(os tovtov KaTa^pov^(ravTti Kal 
T^s ^aeriXei'as i^iwta-ov. 

1 But with a spurious addition to a.d. 1042 ; cf. Krumbaoher, Geschiehte 
derbyeant. Literature, pp. 337-339). ^ p^ zopodarpTis. 


§ 40. Flaccus Albinus Alcuinus 

(A.D. 735-804) 

De diuin. offic. VI. (spurious) (torn. ii. col. 1178, ed. Migne): 
Istorum enim Magorum primus Zoroastres rex exstitit, a quo originem 
feruntur traxisse. 

§ 41. Georgios Sunkellos 

(Flourislied about a.d. 775-800) 

Vol. i. p. 147 f., ed. Bonnenn. : 'AXe'^avSpos o HoXvivTiap Ik toBSc tov 
f/Sve' [2405] KoajxiKm iTovs pavXtrai ttoXw Trfv jj-cto, tov KaraKXycr/xov tS>v 
XaA.8aiW ISacTLXeiav Kardp^acrdai /j-vdoXoySiv 8ia (rdprnv koX vrjpuiv Koi irtLcrcrtav 
pe/SafTiXcvKeyai XaXSaiojv Kat M.i^Su>v PacnXw ir^' [86] iv Tpicrfivplon iTtdi 
Kai thh' [49], TOVT ecTTtv Iv crapois ff [9] Kat vqpois P [2] icai (r(i)o-(rois 
■q [8], awi-p Tiv€s tSv iKKXri<na<TTLKSiv ij/xSv IcrTopiKuiv ov KoXSis e^eXa/Soi/To 
TrdXiv ds iTTj rjXiaKo. hS' [94] Kai prjvai rj [8], airep (os <jia(nv cU to 
i/ivhO' [2499] iTos KoupxKov (TvvTpi\a. avo Se tovtov tov ^ovov tu>v 
T?' [86] Svo jU,€v XaXSatW jSao'iXiuiv, ^vrjX^ov Kai Xw/iacrySijXov, ITS' [84] 
Se Toiv MtjSojv, ZwpodcTTprjv Kat tovis /jl^t aiiTOV ^' [7] XaXSatW jSaertXeis 
eierayei, Itij Kpar^o-avras ijXiaKo. pV [190], o avTos IloXwo-rcop, ovkIti &ia, 
(rdpwv Kol vqpdiv Kai <tu><t(tusv Kai T^s Xoitt^s oXoyou p-vOiK^i lo'Topias, dXXa 
St' ^XtaKuiv eralv. Toiis yap wpoyevecrTcpous (os ^£0vs ^ -^piOiovs vopt^ovTei 
Kat TOV'; /ACT awTovs T'^v TrXdvijv £i<Trjyovf/,cvoi tiS ovti y^povov; diretpoDS j8e;8a- 
o-tXevKcVat <jvveypa\pav, di'Stov ttvat tov Koapov So|a^ovTes evavTttus Tats 6eo- 
irvevtrTots ypa<^ats. toiis 8e p,eTay£ve(7T€pous Kai Trao't <j>avepovs 8i tjXiokSv 
«t5v us SviyTous, Kai ofi;^ cos Tto IXavoSaJpci) SoKet Kai eTtpots Ttcrt, 8ta to 
eo-i^aT<os UTTO Zwpodo'Tpov tu>v TjXtaKtoi/ eviairrGv ek t<ov toI 'Evtoj^ iyvota'piftDV 

€KTOT£ IjXtaKOtS tTCO'lV iTTlptTpUddal TO. TU)V PatTlXiiHV iTTj. 

Ibid. p. 316, ed. Bonnenn.: oTt 8k ootd/ac^mvws ot tS>v 'EXX^i/w 

KTTOpiKoi yeypd<l>a(n Trcpl t&v xpovov Kat tu>v ^aaiXiuiv tovtiov ■rrapi(TTia 
K.e(jiaXi<i)v iwLa-rjpxJi els, ov)^ 6 TV)(U)V, avTO) <j>d(TK(iiv ' "Ap^o/^at ypd^av 
dcf) w aXXot T£ ipvrjfjLovevtrav Kai to, TrpuTa 'EXXaviKos Te 6 AecryStos Kat 
KTT^o-iTys o Kvtotos, tireira HpdSoTos o 'AXtKapvao-evs. to iraXatov t^s 
Ao'ias ijSacriXeva'av Ao'o'uptot, toIv 8c 6 BtJXov NtVos. etT* CTToyct yivviw 
S£jatpdju,£o)s Kai ZwpodcrTpov pdyov £T£t v/8' [52] t^s NtVou /8ao-tX£tas. 

(Also cited in the Chronicon, pars i., of Eusebius, torn. i. 43 f., 
ed. Aucber. Cf. Jerome's translation of the Chronicon, torn. viii. 
col. 46, ed. Migne.) 


§ 42. Anathemas against Mauichseism 

(About 835) 

Cited by Cotelerius, SS. Patrum qui temporibus apostolicis floru- 
erunt opera. Paris, 1672 ; notes coll. 368-376.* These ' Anathemas ' 
were to be recited by converts from Manicheeism to Christianity. 
In this long and valuable document, Zarades (probably Zoroaster) 
and his prayers (the Avesta ?) are declared accursed as being con- 
nected with the Manichaean faith. Anathemas: ava6ii/.a.Ti^<o Zapd.- 

8-qv ov 6 MaVTjs Ocov eAeye Trpo avToru (jiavevra Trap' 'IvSots Koi Ilepcrais, Kal 
rjXiov aTreKaXet ' crw avTiS 8e Kal ras ZapaSeiovs ovofjia^oixivas ev;(ds. . . . 
ava&tfJiaTt^U) Toiis Tov ZapaSrjV Kal BovSSv Kal tov XptcTTOi' Kal tov Wavixaiov 
Kal TOV rjkiov eva Kal tov avTov elvai XeyovTas- . • . a.va6tpaTLt,ij> tov TraTepa 
MavevTOS IlaTeVtoi' ota ifitvaTrjv Kal tov ^evSovi TtaTepa, Kal TrjV avTOv p,rjTipa 
Kapocrcrav, Kal lepaKa Kal UpaKXiiSrjv Kal A(j>96vi,ov Toil's VTro^vrjixaTUTTWi 
Kal i^rjyrjTo,': t5v tovtoiv <Tvyypap,p.a.Tii>v, koa. tov% Xoittows aiiTOfu p.a6r)Ta.% 
aTravras, Sicrivi'tov tov hiaZo\ov T-^s tovtov f/.T/jviai, ®<ofjiav tov crvvTa^diJixvov 
TO KaT avTov Xeyo/xevov evayyiXiov, BouSav, 'Ep/xav, "ASai/, 'A8ei/;iai/Tov, 
Zapovav,^ TaPpiajSiov, 'Aydwiov, 'JXapiov, 'OXu/iTTtov, 'Apio'TOKpiTOv, %aX/Juucv, 
Ivvalov, HdaTTiv, Bapatav, k.t.X. 
Similarly Goarius, ^ixoXoyiov sine Rituale Graecorum, Paris, 

1647, p. 885 : avaOeixaTi^u) Kal KaTaOipuiTi^o) ^apdSrjv Kal BoSSav Kal 
"SiKvOiavbv Tovs Trpo MaviX'^t'u)!' yeyovora';. . , . Trpos 8e tovtoL'; avaOefxa- 
TL^o) Kal KaTaOcfuiTi^o} criiv TOis Trpoyeypa/JL/j.evoi'S ^^3.a^tv lepaKa Kal Hpa- 
KXet'Sr/v Kal 'A(j>96viov Toiis i^riyrjTas Kal inrofjLvrjpAXTio'Ta.'; tov avTov dvofiov 
Kal Pc^-qXov MavevTos Kal ©WjuSv Kal Zajoouav Kal VajSpid^tov? 

1 See Kessler, Mani. i. 358-365, Ber- tovtov StiSoxos • koI Ba/Ms 6 rh kot 

lin, 1889. avTbv Mai/txatKii' evaYy^^iov trvvTd^as ' 

^ ZaKoias siue Zaxoias, Kessler. BovSSus re Kal 'Ep/ias, "ASavros Koi 'AS^- 

^ An important passage which serves ^avTos, tv hireaTeiKev eU Std<popa /cx/^ara 

to throw light on these Anathemas is K-hpvKa t^j wKav-ns • ^{ijyrjTal St ainj? koI 

found in Petros Sikelos (about a.d. uTro/ii/rj/itoTio-Tol yey6va(rii> 'Upa^ koI 'Hpa- 

1100, see Krumbaoher, Geschiohte der xKeiSris koI 'A<pe6vi,os • mrjpxov Se aurij! 

hyzant. Literatur'^, p. 78), Historia koX erepoi imSitTaX rpsTs, 'Aydnos 6 riiv 

Manichxorum, xvi. (col. 1265 seq., 'Y,irTd.\oyov (TuvTd^as /co! Zapoias koI Tag- 

ed. Migne): — pidPios. . . . vaa-av yoip avrav pl$\ov 

?iv Si irph TOVTOV [sc. MdvfVTOsI ttol as atreffrj SiSdyjiaTa KaTe'xoi/ffoj' Kal P\a(r- 

erepos ttjs Kaxlas SiSd<rKaKas Tairnis, ipimias vdirris irfirAnipa/ifviiv /col VMav 

Zapdvris oviiiaTi, dfiifpaiv aliTov imdp- cuxV Ktyop.ivrtv Trap' aiirav, /iaWov Si 

X^V naBcTal Sk Toirov tov ovtixP'O'tou yorjTelav, f) KaS' Ti/icis ayta KaBoKiicii Kal 

MdviVTos yey6va(ri SiiSeKW iio'lvvios 6 liwo<rTo\tKii'EKKKii(ria im6cndTt<rf> 


§ 43. Georgios Hamartolos Monachos 

(Wrote about a.d. 850) 

Chronicon, I. (col. 117, ed. Migne): km TrpHrov 6v£iv Oeols XaXSaiot 
8c iievpov yjroi Kwrpiot, Si,a<j>opovvTai yap tOvoi Ilepo-tKov<s ' rr/v 
Se acTTpovofiLav iipevprjKevai irpSnoL BaySvXulwoi hia. 'Qpiaao-rpov,^ ii wv 
8evTipoi 7rap£t\)j<^aoriv AtywrTtot. ttjv yew/xcTptav €k tov dirXeTov rrj's yrji 
/cat Trji StatpcVeus Tu>v xtopiov TTpoBiSa^OivTes ' koI elo ovto) ypaij/avTes, 
erepoi /xETeXa/Soi/. rr/v Se payday koI yorjTeiav kol <j>apiJuxKeiav M^Soi ph> 
i(j)€vpov Kal Tlipvai, Siatjiipovcn 8e Trpos dAAiJXous ■ ij piv yap payeia im- 
K\rj<TLi iun Saipovuiv, dya^OTroiSv S^6iv Trpos ayaOov crv<TTr](rtv Ttvos, UMnrtp 
Ta ToS 'ATToXXoivtov TOV Tuttvcws OecrTTicrpxiTa 8l ayaOStv ycyovacriv " ij Se 
•yOTjTEia eTTHcXijcrts ecrTi Saip,wa)v KaKOTroiSi/ irept Toiis Ta<Jiovs rOuavpevri im, 
KaKoiu Ttvos trvoracriv " o0£v Kat -yoTjTeMi KEKXjjrai ctTro Tuli/ youtv Koi t5v 
dpr)v<iiv Tuiv wepl Toiis Tai^ous ytvop,ev<ov. 

See also under Chronicon Paschale, § 39. 

§ 44. Photios 

(Patriarcli of Constantinople a.d. 876-879) 

Bibliotheca, Codd. LXXXI. (torn, iii.; col. 281, ed. Migne): 
aviyvuxrdri /St/SXiSaptov ©eoSuipoD Ilept rrji iv IlepcrtSi payiKiji Kal 
Tt's ff TTJ'S e.v(Te.pc[a<s Sia(f>opd, iv Xoyots rpuri. Trpocrcjxavd 8e ovtoiis 
Trpos M.a(TTOvj3iov ec Appevia^ oppiopevov, ')(iapeKi(TKOirov 8e Tuyp^avoi'Ta. 
Kat £1/ jnei/ T<3 ■7rp(aT<a Xoyw irpocTTtfieTat ro p-iapbv Hepautv Soy/iui, o Zapd- 
St/s^ cicrij-yijcraTO, ^Tot irepi tou Zovpovdp,^ ov dpx»?yov TravTwi' dcrdya, oV 
Kat Tij^'/v KaXet" Kat oTt o-7rei/8(i)v iva tekj; tov 'OppCaSav, erCKCv Ikuvov 
Koi TOV Saramv ' Kat irept t^s airfiv aXpopi^lw;. Kai oTrXSs to 8uo"<r£- 
)S«s Kat viripai(r^ov Soyjua Kara Xe^iv tK^eis dvatrKtud^ct cv t<3 TrpcuTO) 
Xoytt). ev 8« Tots XotTTOts 8uo't Xoyois Ta wept t^s eio't/Sows 8iip)(iTai 
irtiuTEcos, ciTro t^s Kocrpoyovias ap^dpevoi, Kal Trcpi avT^s T^s ;!^aptTOS 6/tot(«s 
Kat iTnTpoxdSir}V BieXOiav. 

ouTos o ©EoStopos o Moi^ovEiTTtas etvai SoKCt. T^v T£ yap NEo-ToptW aipc- 
o'lv, Kat p.aXio-Ta ev Tip TptTtt) Xoyo), Kparvvoiv Trpocrava^wvet, dXXa Kot t^v 
T<lv apapT<ii\iJi)v AirOKarda'Tacnv TtpaTEUETai. 

1 Notice this contaminated form, a ^ za<rp<lSris c. 

mixture of Zoroaster and Ormazd (?). » Zopou(i/t C 


§ 45. Suidas 

(Middle of Tenth Century a.d.) 

Suidas (ed. Kuster, Cambr. 1705) sub voc. : 'AvTio-6ivr)9 'AOtj- 
vaios. . . . (Tvviypaij/e ro/iovs Se/ca, irpuiTov fJuiyiKOv. a<l>rjy€iTai 8e ircpl 
Zu)pod.<TTpov Tivos imyov ivpevTOi T^v (roi^iav- touto Si TivK 'ApicTToreka, 
01 Se 'Pd8(i)vt avaTi9ia(nv. 

'AcTTpovofJiia. ij tZv Sxrrpwv ^Mvop/q, irpmroi SafivXiavioi ravrijv e^tv- 
pov 8ta Zij>pod.(TTpov • /Jbiff ov Kal Oaravijs ' ot iTr€<TTritrav Trj ovpavia, Kivrjua 
Ta TTtpl Totis TiKTopavov^ avfi^aivtiv. 

ZmpodtTTpri';. ne/3(ro/Ai/8);s. cro<f>oi irapot Tovis ev ry do'rpovo/iict. os 
Kal TrpSros TJp^aTO tov Trap avTOK TroXirevofxevov ovoimrtK tZv Mdyoiv. 
lyevfxo 8e wpo tCv TpwiKuiv €Tcmv ^' [500], (fycperai. 8e avraiv mpl 
<^i;o'C(os ^i^kia Sf. irtpX XlBiov Ti/xCiov ev. dtTTepocricoTriKa. d7roT£X£(r/ia- 
TiKO. PipXLa e. 

Ziapoda-TpTji. 'AaTpovofUK. eiri tfivov /SatnXeoJS 'Aa-avpimv. ooris 
r/viaTO viro 'irvpoi ovpaviov TeXeuT^trai, irapeyyuijcras Tots Acrcrvpioii rrjv 
Ti(j)pav avTov <j}vXdTT€Lv, ovtu> yap avTOis V ^atnkaa ouk fKkatj/a Sia 
Trai/Tos, ojrep P-^XP'' ^'"^ TreijivXaKTai Trap airois. 

Zcopojudo-SpT/s. Xa\8atos crotjiO's. typaxj/c fUiBrip,aTiKa Kai <j>V(TiKd. 

Mayot n-apa Ileptrats oi ^i\dcro<^ot /cat ^iXodcoi, (uv ^px^ Zupodo-Tpiys, 
Kai p.£Ta toCtov KaTo, 8ta8ox^v Ocrravat Kat A<TTpdiJi,\j/v\oi. 

TivOayopas- elra [^SC. ^Kovcre Ilvflaydpas] 'Ay8api8os tov 'Yirep^optov 
Kol ZdprjTos Tciv Mdyou. 

§ 46. Hugo de Sancto Victore 

(Died A.D. 1141) 

Adnot. Elucidat. in Pentateuchon — in Gen. (torn. i. col. 
49, ed. Migne) : Assur autem, recedens in terram quae postea ab 
ipso dicta est Assyria, multiplicatus est usque ad regem Ninum, qui 
ab eius progenie ortus est. hie condidit ciuitatem et uicit Cbam in 
bello, qui usque ad illud tempus uixerat : factus rex Bactriae Nino 
uicinus, et uocatus Zoroastes inuentor et auctor maleficae mathe- 
maticae artis ; qui etiam septem liberales artes quattuordecim colum- 
nis, septem aeneis et septem lateritiis, contra utrumque diluuium in 
utilitatem posterorum praeuidens scripsit. huius libros mathema- 


ticae Mnus adeptus uictoriam combussit. post haec audacior factus 
inuasit Nemroth, id est Chaldaeos, et acquisiuit Babyloniam, trans- 
ferens illuc caput imperii sui. 

§ 47. Michael Glukas 

(Flourished about a.d. 1150) 

Ann. Pars II. (col. 253, ed. Migne; p. 244, ed. Bonnenn.) : jueTa 
Se Kjowov ipa(TiXev(re Ntvos err/ vj3i, os ye T-qv oiKuav ^-qripa 'Sd/xipafiiv 
Xafiu)v CIS ywatKa, voyiios iyivcro Ilepo-ais Xa/i^dvuv Tcls iavrSiv iJ,rjT€pai 
Kol dScX^as. £^ ov yei/ows iyivero Kal ZupoacTTpo's 6 irepi^orjTO's TLcpcrwv 
a.(JTpov6fX,(ys, OS £r7re TOis IJEpcrais, eav Kavcry ;U.e to ovpdvLov irvp — tovto yap 
ffvy^ero — XajSere Ik tS)v 6(TTiwv f^ov Kal <j>v\a(T(reT€ eis (rvfiTacnv t^s /Saat- 
Aetas vp.S)v. o Srj koI yeyovev, ev 8c rais luTOpuxts ats i)^'^(TaTO Kara 
'lovXtavov o 6eoA.oyos jueyas TpyjyopLo^ Kal raSe <f)rj(TL' rrjv &ffTpovop.uiv 
XeyovTai TrpStTov aiprjKivai Ba^uXtuvioi Sia Z(i>pod(TTpov, 0£vT€pov Sk cSe'^airo 
ot AtywTTTiot • TTjv §£ jiayuav evpov M^Soi, EtTa ncpo-at. Siatfiipei 8e /tayeia 
yoiyretas, Kai ij /Aev /w.ayeia imKXrjcrk iunv, <us <^acn, Sai/xovtov ayaOoiroiuiv 
Trpos dya^oS rtvos arvcTTamv. yorqTua 8e eo-rt Sat/*dvft)v KaKoiroLuiv wepl Toiis 
Tac^ovs £iXou/i€'v(oi' eirt /ca/cov Ttvos O'uo'racrts. yorjrua 8e rjKOVfrev diro tGv 
yowv Kat Oprjvmv Tuiv iv Tots rac^ois yivofxiviDV ' /JMyeia 8e dTro MayoDO'aiW, 
^Toi Ilepo-Gv, o^£V ^'''X^ ""' '''V "-RXV^- Mayus eyx^pw^s oi Ilepcrat XeyovTot. 

§ 48. Anon. 

Theologoumena Arithmetika, p. 42 f., ed. Ast (Lips. 1817): 

^ /iaX\oi', 6 fcai TlvOayopiKiaTCpov, iTreiSrj Kal Ba/JvXwvicov oi SoKi/AWTaTOl Kai 
"Oo-ravi/s Kat ZiapodfTTprj^ dyeXas KvpiW's KaXovcri ras atrrpiKos o"^atpas, 
^T06 Trap oo-ov TeXet'oJS ayovTal Trepl to KevTpov p,6vai, irapa. to. cw/ianKa 
fieyedrj ' rj ajro Tov o'wSe<rp,ot irois Kai <rway<i)yat ^prj/JiaTL^eiv SoyiM/rt^etrBai 
Trap' airSv t5>v <f)V(nKSiv Xoywv, as dycXovs Kara ra. avra KaXov<nv iv tois 
tepois Xoyots, KaTa Trapep,7rT(i>cnv 8e tov yap,/ia l(^Oapfi.kvu>i dyycXows " Sio Kai 
Tovs Ka6 iKd(rTrjV tovtoiv tmv dyyeX<i>v c^apxovras dcrrepas koi Sai/xovas 
ojxoMi dyyeXovs Kai apyayyiXov^ irpocrayopec^trBaX, omcp tlirlv iirTO. tov 
apiBjwv, (iXTTC dyyeXia Kara tovto ETU/xoraTa ^ ipSo/id'S, 

§ 49. Petrus Comestor 

(Died 1178) 

Hist. Schol. Lib. Genesis XXXIX. (col. 1090, ed. Migne) ; 
Ninus uicit Cham, qui adhuc uiuebat, et regnabat in Bractia (sic, al. 


Thracia), et dicebatur Zoroastres inuentor magicae artis, qui et sep- 
tem liberales artes in quattuordecim columnis scripsit, septem aeneis, 
et septem. lateritiis, contra utrumque iudicium [al. diluuium]. 
Ninus uero libros eius combussit. ab eisdem orta sunt idola sic. 

§ 50. Abdiae Apostolica Historia 

(Quotation of a Name Zaroesi) 

Abdiae Apostolica Historia, Lib. VI. 7. PassioSS. Simoniset 
ludae: Atque haec de lacobo. cuius fratres maiores natu, Simon 
cognominatus Chananaeus et ludas, qui et Thaddaeus et Zelotes, et 
ipsi apostoli Domini nostri lesu Christi, cum per reuelationem Spiri- 
tus Sancti per fidem fuissent religionem ingressi, inuenerunt statim 
inter initia suae praedicationis duos ibi magos, Zaroen et Arfaxat, 
qui a facie Sancti Matthaei Apostoli de Aethiopia fugerunt. erat 
autem doctrina eorum praua, ita ut Deum Abraham et Deum Isaac 
et Deum lacob blasphemantes, Deum dicerent tenebrarum, et Moysen 
dicerent maleficum fuisse, denique omnes prophetas Dei a deo 
tenebrarum missos adsererent. praeterea animam hominis partem 
Dei habere dicerent, corporis vero figmentum a Deo malo factum 
esse, et idee ex contrariis substantiis constare, in quibus laetatur 
caro, anima contristatur, et in quibus exultat anima, corpus affligitur. 
solem et lunam deorum numero applicantes, aquam simul deitatem 
habere docebant. Dei autem Filium, Dominum nostrum lesum 
Christum, phantasiam fuisse, nee uerum hominem, nee ex uera 
uirgine natum, nee uere tentatum, nee uere passum, nee uere sepul- 
tum, nee uere tertia die resurrexisse a mortuis adfirmabant. hac 
praedicatione poUuta Persida post Zaroen et Arfaxat, magnum meruit 
inuenire doctorem, per beatos apostolos Simonem et ludam, id est 
Dominum lesum Christum. 

Ibid. 13: Haec et alia cum dux apud regem Xerxen disseruisset, 
excitati in zelum, qui cum rege fuerant Zaroes et Arfaxat magi, 
simul indignabundi rumores sparserunt : malignos eos homines esse, 
qui contra deos gentis contraque regnum tam astute molirentur. 
nam si uis scire rex — inquiunt — quod ea uera sunt quae dieimus, 
non prius permittemus hos loqui quam deos tuos adorauerint. tum 

1 This is cited because Zaroes (Za- Apostelgeschichten und Apostellegen- 

jO((i)s) has been identified with Zoroas- den, Braunschweig, 1883-1890. But 

ter by Nbldeke in p. 76 of Ergan- Gutschmid, Bhein. Mus. six. 380 seq. 

sungsheft su Lipsius Die apokryphen identifies Zaroes with Zarvan. 


dux : audetisne cum illis habere conflictum, ut si uiceritis eos, turn 
demum abiciantur ? dixerunt magi : aequum est ut sicut nos adora- 
mus deos nostros, ita adorent et illi. respondit dux: hoc scilicet 
confiictus uester ostendet. ad haec iterum magi: uis uidere — 
inquiunt — potentiam nostram ut probes quia non poterunt loqui 
nobis praesentibus : iube adstare hie qui sint eloquentes in Unguis, 
acutissimi in argumentis, et clamosi in uocibus. et si tunc ausi 
fuerint nobis praesentibus loqui, probabis nos esse imperitissimos. 
tunc iussu regis et ducis omnes aduocati praesto facti, ita sunt a 
duce admoniti ut quanta possent constantia haberent cum his magis 
contentiones et eos a defensionum proposito, argumentorum suorum 
proposito excluderent. et cum in praesentia regis et ducis cuncto- 
rumque sublimium magi locuti essent, omnis ilia aduocatio ita muta 
facta est, ut nee nutibus quod loqui non poterat indicaret. et cum 
unius fere horae transisset spatium, dixere magi ad regem : ut scias 
nos ex deorum esse numero, permittimus eos quidem loqui, sed 
ambulare non posse, quod cum fecissent, adiecerunt dicentes : ecce 
reddimus eis gressum, sed f aciemus eos apertis oculis nihil uidere. 
cumque et hoc fecissent, expauit cor regis et ducis, dicentibus amicis 
eorum, non debere contemni hos magos, ne et regi et duel inferant 
debilitatem in membris. igitur hoc spectaculum a primo mane 
usque ad horam sextam dum spectatur, aduocati maerore confecti, 
ad suas reuersi sunt quique domes, nimio animi impulsu fatigati. 

Ibid. 17: Haec cum dixissent apostoli, deportati sunt ad hospitalia 
magi, qui per triduum nee cibum capere nee bibere ullo modo pote- 
rant, sed in his sola uociferatio doloribus extorta incessabilis extitit. 
postea cum iam res in eo esset ut pariter expirarent magi Zaroes et 
Arfaxat, accesserunt eos apostoli dicentes : non dignatur Deus habere 
coacta seruitia. igitur surgite sani habentes liberam facultatem 
conuertandi a malo ad bonum et exeundi a tenebris ad lumen, at 
illi permanentes in perfidia sua, sicut a facie Matthaei apostoli 
fugerunt, sic et ab his duobus apostolis fugientes, ad simulacrorum 
cultores, per totam Persidis regionem, ut apostolis inimicitias exci- 
tarent, ubique dicebant : ecce ueniunt ad uos inimici deorum nostro- 
rum, etc. 

Ibid. 20: Quippe Zaroes et Arfaxat magi facientes scelera multa 
per ciuitates Persidis, et dicentes se esse ex genere deorum, semper 
a facie apostolorum fugientes, tamdiu erant in quacunque ciuitate, 
qnamdiu cognoscerent apostolos aduenire. 


Ibid. 23: Quo tempore et duo, de quibus diximus, magi Zaroes 
et Arfaxat ictu coruscationis adusti ad carbonem conuersi sunt.'' 

Lib. VII. 1 de S. Matthaeo: In quam [sc. Aethiopiam] pro- 
fectus ipse, cum in ciuitate magna quae dicitur Naddauer moraretur, 
in qua rex Aeglippus sedebat, contigit ut duo magi Zaroes et 
Arfaxat simul essent, qui regem miris modis ludificabant, ut se deos 
esse remota ambiguitate crederet. et credebat eis rex omnia et 
omnis populus non solum memoratae urbis sed ex longinquis etiam 
regionibus Aethiopiae ueniebant quotidie ut adorarent eos. faci- 
ebant enim subito hominum gressus figi, et tamdiu immobiles stare 
quamdiu ipsi uoluissent. similiter et uisus hominum et auditus a 
suo officio refrenabant. imperitabant serpentibus ut percuterent, 
quod et Marsi facere solent et ipsi incantando multos curabant. et 
ut dici uulgo solet, malignis maior reuerentia exhibetur ex timore 
quam benignis ex amore, sic et illi uenerabiles apud Aethiopes, in 
magno diu pretio fuerunt. 

Ibid. 4: Conabantur autem interea arte sua magica excitare eos 
[sc. suos duos dracones ante pedes Matthaei apostoli dormientes] 
Zaroes et Arphaxat, et non poterant neque oculos aperire neque 
penitus commouere quidquam. 

§ 51. The So-called Zoroastrian Logia or Chaldsean Oracles 
MAriKA AoriA 


Introductory Note by Louis H. Gray. — Amid the luxuriant growth 
of apocryphal and prophetic literature, which sprang up in the first centuries 
of our era, no small part is ascribed to the faith of Iran. The wonderful 
eschatology of the Persian religion made a deep impression on the Hellenic 
mind at an early date, and this was to bring forth fruit in the development of 
Gnosticism and Neo-Platonism. Apparently in this way arose the so-called 
Chaldsean Oracles, which bear the mark of Gnostic and Neo-Platonic mysticism 
and somewhat recall the Christian forgery of the Sibylline Oracles. 

The pseudo-Zoroastrian compositions had but a short shrift. The great 
Porphyry ruthlessly attacked them and suppressed them, and they are lost to 
us forever. Doubtless they were no better and no worse than the great majority 
of similar writings which have survived ; perhaps we may even say that the 

1 Is this a reminiscence of the legend of Zoroaster's death by lightning, 
p. 124 seq. ? v 


Oneirokritikon of Astrampsuohos, a Christian forgery of about the fifth century, 
affords a type of some of these lost books. 

But in the writings of the Neo-Platonic philosophers there lay hid a mass 
of citations, termed ' Chaldsean Logia,' or more usually, simply 'Logia,' or 
again, introduced by the formula : ' As saith one of the Gods,' or even appear- 
ing without any introductory phrase whatsoever.! These Logia date in general 
about the end of the second century a.d. , and they present to us a heterogeneous 
mass, now obscure and again bombastic, of commingled Platonic, Pythagorean, 
Stoic, Gnostic, and Persian tenets.^ I am inclined to doubt that the entire mass 
comes from a single source, although some have suggested that a certain Julian 
the Chaldsean or his son, who lived in the period of the Antonines, may per- 
haps have been the author.^ However trivial the Logia justly appear to us, 
they received the serious attention of lamblichos, Proklos, Simplikios, Damaskios, 
and lohannes Ludos, while Hierokles and later Plethon wrote ' compends of the 
Zoroastrian and Platonic Systems.' * 

In the fifteenth century Georgios Gemistos Plethon, led on, as I venture to 
suggest, by some such allusion to ZaipodtTTpov Xoyia as the reference contained 
in the citation from Xanthos, preserved by Nikolaos of Damascus, boldly foisted 
upon Zoroaster the Logia which hJid been hitherto only 'Chaldean.' This 
we may term the first recension. It consists of sixty lines and was first pub- 
lished by Ludovicus Tiletanus, together with Plethon' s commentary, at Paris in 
1568^^ This text was also commented upon by Psellos as early as the eleventh 
century. Possibly we may even regard Psellos as the compiler who gathered 
the scattered fragments which go to make up this collection. 

The second recension, if we may employ so dignified a term, was made by 
rranoiscus Patricius in 1591. A second edition of this appeared at Venice in 
1593. This second edition forms the basis of Stanley in his History of Phi- 
losophy, 4 ed., London, 1743, Latin translation, Leipzig, 1711, and it was the 
only one accessible to me except Stanley. On this new collection of Patricius 
the present edition is based. The object of my work here has been to secure 
as good a text as possible. My chief aid, or rather my only aid, has been the 
masterly discussion by KroU, "De Oraculis Chaldalcis," in the seventh volume 

1 See KroU, de Oraculis Ghaldaicis, Gtcbo. torn. 122. 1115-1154, including 
pp. 6-9, Breslau, 1894. also Psellos's comment. In addition 

2 KroU, pp. 66-72. to the books already cited, I should 
" Ibid. 71. mention the valuable compendium of 
* Ibid, passim ; KleuTcer Anhang the tenets of the Oracles contained in 

zum Zend-Avesta, ii. TheU 1, pp. 8-9, the seventeenth letter of Michael 

16-18. Plethon's Oompend. is edited Italikos (for this identification see 

by Migne in his Patrol. Qrxc. tom. Treu, Byzant. Zeitschrift, iv. 1-22) 

160. 973-974. edited by Cramer in Anecdota Oxo- 

^ This has unfortunately been in- niensia, iii. 180-183 (Oxford, 1836), 

accessible to me. I have used instead and for the entire subject the valuable 

the edition by Servatius GaUaeus in discussion in Harles's edition of Fabri- 

his SifluWioKol Xp-qaiiol, Amstelod. cius's Bibliotheca Grxca, I. 307-315 

16Si9, and by Migne in his Patrol. (Hamb. 1790). 


of the Breslauer Philologische Abhandlungen (Breslau, 1894) . That his readings 
are given in the notes does not signify a rejection of them. They would gener- 
ally appear in the text if I did not desire to preserve Patricius's text except where 
the latter is absolutely unintelligible. The motive for preserving this has been 
purely historical. The Breslau professor has practically collected the Logia 
anew, and he has learnedly disciissed their sources and philosophical import. 
To him, moreover, the references to the Neo-Platonic authors cited in my foot- 
notes are mainly due. Mine has been the humbler task to reprint an obsoles- 
cent collection, with only those emendations which are absolutely necessary. I 
have made a translation of the Oracles or Logia, which I hope later to publish 
with a version of the other Greek and Latin citations found in this Appendix. 

The Oracles have never had many friends, and as a comment on them I may 
note that good old Thomas Hyde prayed that these ' pseudoracula pessime 
conflota carmine Graeco ' might perish like others of their stamp ■ (cf. Hist. 
Relig. vet. Fers., Pref. p. vi.). His prayer has been in great part fulfilled. In 
estimating, moreover, the general value of the Logia, we may say, in the words 
of Shakspere, that the good points in them, like Gratiano's reasons, ' are as two 
grains of wheat hid in two bushels of chaff.' 


^eX. oTTOv iraTpiK-q fJLOvdi icTTi} 

Aa/ji. rava'q iiTTi, ;u,ovas kcu 8vo yivvS..^ 

TlpoK. Aa/ii. Sva.'S yap Trapa. TwSe KddrjTai, koi voepaii Hffrpairra TO/uais/ 

Kai TO Kvficpvav to. Travra, Kal rdmiv oicuttov ov ra^Oiv. 
5 Aa/x.. iraiTi yap ev K6<rfuo XafJiirti Tpias ^s /u,oms 3.p)(ei.* 

a.p)(r] TracTTjs T/ATjcreus r]8e ■^ Ta^ts.° 
TlpoK. eis rpta. yap varus eiTTE waTpos rifWctTOai airavra, 

ov TO BiXav Kariviva^e, Kal rjSr] iravT lTtT[Ji,i]TO. 

eis Tpia yap etire voSs iraTpos aiSiov ' 
10 V(3 TrdvTa Kv/SepvStv. 

Aa/u. Kal itpavr/frav iv avrrj rj T dperr] Kal ^ cro^ui, 

Kal ij TroXv<j>po)v drpcKEta.' 

Trj TwvSe jOta rpiaSos 8£ Trpo t^s ovctijs, 

ov TrputTTj';, aXy ov to. ixerpitrai? 

1 Proc. in Euclid, i. def. 2 (p. 98, « Proc. in Farm. 1091. 6 ; Dam. i. 
ed. Priedlein); in Alcib. 356. 20. 253. 25 ; ii. 60. 28 ; 62. 28. 

2 Proc. in Euclid, i. def. 2 (p. 98, ' Proc. in Tima. 313 P. vovs elTre, 
ed. Friedlein); Dam. ii. 29. 16, ubi <h Kroll. 

legitur et apud Patrio. ^ Dam. ii. 45. 10. re pro t% Kroll. 

8 Om. yap, Kroll. Proc. in Crat. 56. ^ ^J hiitpolv di] twcSs ^e'ei rpdios 5c>a 

6 ; in Kemp. 376. 34 ; Dam. ii. 177. irpirns \ oiiai]s oli Trpdrrts, oA\' o4 Tk 

20, etc. voTirh, /ueT/jeiTai, Dam. ii. 63. 21 ; 

4 Dam. i. 87. 3 ; ii. 87. 14. Kroll. 

6 Dam. ii. 58. 20, 


15 dpxais yap rpurX ToierSe Xd^oK SovXevuv arravTa} 

lepos irpuTos 8pd/ios, iv 8 apa, fi£(r(X<o 
^eptos, rpiTos otXXos, os ej/ Trupl t^v x66va OaXvei,^ 
Kol irrjyr) irrfylav, kol wqyStv OTracrSj'. 
p-i^Tpa OTJve^oDO'a to, wtivTa. 

20 ev^ci/ apSrjv 6p<o<TK€L yevecrK iroXvTTOiKiXov vXrj'S. 

IIpoK. iv&iv crupo/Aevos TrprjdTrjp dp-vopoio irvpos avpos, 
jcdo-jLiiov IvOpiacTKiav KoiXijip.a.(n. Travra yap tvBev 
ap\iT(U. eis TO KaT<o rctVcti/ aKTivas ayrjTdi, 


4'£\. eavTov o TraTrjp ■qpirao'ev ov8* ev €ij 
25 8t)mp.ei voepa KXetVas iStoj/ Trvp. 

*eX. oi yap d7ro TrarpiKijs apx^s drtXes n Tpoxaf«.' 

irdvTa yap i^€T£X£(T(T£ irar^p 

(cai v(3 -n-apiSioKe Sevrepw, 

ov wp&Tov KXrjC^iTai Trav yevos^ dvSpGv. 
30 IIpoK. TraTpoy£ves c^dos iroXir yap povo'; 

Ik irarpoi dXKijS Spaj/iipevoi vdoi; dvSos.^ 

epya vo^cras yap TrarpiKos vdos auToyevtSAos, 

irSo'ti' ivicmipev Sccrpbv irvpiPpidrj cpwTOSj 

o^pa Ta TrdvTa p.hnj, xpovov eis direpavTov ipUvra 
35 /'•'jTe TTEcny Ta iraTpoi voepiS v<^a<jpiva. <^eyy£i " 

ais ei' epcoTt /iei^j Kocrpov crToi)(ua pivovTa.^ 

i)(ii T<a voeri/ iraTpiKov vmv ivSiSovai, 

Tracais iTT^yais T£ Kal dpxats. 

IcTTt yap Trepas toD TrarpiKov PvOov kol Tn/jyrj tUv voepuiv. 
40 juijSe irpo^Xflcv, dAA' tptvev iv T<S TrarpiKiS /Juflw/^ 

1 Dam. ii. 217. 5. \ippois pro \i$ois, ° Psell. 58-59. o itotV eaur^c 5})j:ro, 
KroU. ffei', comment. 

2 Dam. ii. 217. 5. iv roirois, prae- ' Psell. 9. oTral, KroU. 

ponit Kroll. ^ Alii fOvea pro jrSi' -yfiios, Psell. 

« Dam.;i. 242. 18 ; 274. 7 ; ii. 67. 1, 53-54. KK-nlCer^, Kroll. 

etc. injy^ Tuv TTTiyuvt fx^rpa avv^xovira ^ Psell. 53-54. 

Tct irivra, KroU. 1° Proc. in Timss. 242 D. 

* i/ivSpoi pro ijuuSpoio, Kroll. ^^ nv^h pro ju^f i KroU. irSo-i, voepHs, 

« Proo. in Timse. 118 C (v. 1); theol. Patrio. 

Plat. 172. 6 (v. 2, 3 a); 171. 9 (v. 3 b, ^^ aiv ipa-ri /neVei Kiaiiov iTToxf^a 

4). airoBpc^irKfi -pro ipSiiv ep<^<rKei,Kio]l ffeo^ra, KroU. Proc. in Timae. 165 E-F. 

cum conieotura aSijv. i' Proc. in Tim®. 167 C. 


Kai kv T<3 dSvTO) Kara, r-qv 6io9pifx.ii.ova. (ny-qv. 
ov yap eis v\t]v nvp iircKUva to irpStTov 
ky}v Svvafi.iv KaraKXeia Ipyots, dXXa v6<a? 
avfijioXa yap irarpiKos vooi tarreipev Kara KOCTfxov 
45 OS TO. vorjTo. voci Kal a<j>pa<j-Ta KoXXtj votiTaL.' 

AajLi, 6\o<j>vrj'; fi,epi<Tfj.o% Kal afxepiO'TO'S' 

vm fikv KaT£)(iL TO. vor/To., oXa-6r]cnv 8e iirdyei koit/xois.^ 
V(3 fi.iv Kari^tL to. vorjTa, i/'^X'?'' ^ kirdya KocrfiOK- 


Aa/i. fcai Tou evbi vov tov vor/Tov. 
60 XlpoK. ov yap avev voos cctti vorfTov " ov )((i>pli VTrdpxti.^ 

TO. fi.ev €<TTt vocpa. Kat vorjTa, ocra voovvra voiirai.^ 

Tpo<f>r] 8e T<S voovvTi to vorjTov. 

fidvOave to vorjTov, eirti voou e^o) iirdpxaJ 

Kal TOV vov, OS Tw kfi.TcvpLOv Koo'fJLOv aya. 
65 vov yap vovs ecmv o Koo'fi.ov TcyyiTr]^ irvpiov.^ 

01 TOV V1T€pK0(Tfi.0V TraTplKOV l3v6oV L(TT£ VOoCvTCS.' 

1/ vojjT^ irdo'rjs TfiT^areioi aytt. 

tOTTi 0£ OTJ Tt V05JT0V, o xpi? O'E voeiv voov avUti. 
Aafi,. ^v yap eTrcy/cXiv^s, <i)S av vovv, Kaxavo voijtnjSj 
60 (OS Ti voSv, ov KEivo vo};o"ets. 

lo"Ti yap oXk^s djat^ti^aoSs 8uvap,tSj 

voepats o-TpdTTTOvo'a TOfxaicnv, ov 8r] )(p^ 

(7<^o8poTr;Ti voeTv to votjtov cKavo, 

d\Xa voov Tavaov Tavarj ^Xoyt '^ 
68 irdvTa p.£TpovoT;, jrX^v to vo»;t6v c/cttvo. 

p^eo) 8^ tovto vomeral • ^v yap eirey/cXtvjjs 

o'ov vovv, KciKeTvo voiyo-cts ovk aTtvciis, 

1 Proo. in Timse. 157 A ; theol. Plat. « Cf. Proo. in Timse. 6 D. 

333. 29 ; Dam. ii. 136. 10. 4s pro €ij, ' Psell. 50. fidSe . . . ?im viov, com- 

Kroll. ment. 

2 Proo. in Crat. 23. 23. Sic KroU. ^ proo. in Tims. 157 A ; theol. Plat. 
Stanl. Lond.,* xaWiilrai, sec. Patric. 333. 29 ; Dam. ii. 136. 10. 

pro KaWtifTrai ; Lips., KaWuTlCei. ' Dam. ii. 16. 6 ; Proc. in Crat. 62. 9. 

8 Proc. in Timse. 68 F, 1G4 C ; in Stan. ^o-re. 
Crat. 56. 5 ; Dam. ii. 177. 20, etc. i" Psell. 51. Se 8)), omis. comment. 

Karixftv et iiriyeiv, KroU. S" pro Se, yip pro St 5^, Kroll. S/9X" pro ^761, 

Patric. * Proc. in Timse. 267 D. Patric. 

' Proc. in theol. Plat. 179. 7. iiojjTct " a'bv pro is tv, Kroll ; iireyi{\lpri et 

KoJ voipi, Kroll. vo^o-p, Stan. 12 ojjj pro ^lAAa, Kroll. 


dXX' ayvov iiri<rTpoij)OV o/i/ita,^ 

<j)cpovTa (r^s ij/v^rji rdvai Kevebv voov 
70 eis TO vorjTOv, oi^pa /j-aOrj's to votjtov,' 

£7r£i I^OD vooi; virdp^ti? 

Tov 8e vo£i iras vovs Otov, ov yap avev 

voos etrrt vojjtoC, Kai to vo-qrov ov vov ^(opts vira.p)(ei. 

TO?s 8e TTvpoi voepov voe.po1i irp-qo-rripcnv awavTa 
76 eiKaOc SovAcwoi/Ta TraTpos iret^oJvtSt /SovXrj. 

Kol TO voelv, a€t t£ fjiivav doKvio iTTpo<j>a\i.yyi. 

TTTyyas t£ Kat dp^"'?) StvEtv, dti T£ p,h>uv doKvia CTTpotjiaLXiyyi.^ 

oXXd Si ovvop-a 0-e/x.vov aKoip-r/TM (TTpot^aXiyyi 

Kocrjuois IvOpiScTKov, KpanrvrjV Sia Trarpbi ivmrjv. 
80 iiro Sijo vouiv rj ^(ooyovos Trijy^ ?repi£i(£Tai \pvy(piv. 


OS £K voov tKOopc TrpmTos,^ 

£0-o-a/i,£Vos TTupi ir5p, (rvvSitr/jiaiv o<^pa Kepda-a-rj ' 
irjjyaious KpaTrjpa.^, €ov irtipos avpos ETTto-i^cov. 
85 voEpats da-TpaTTTCL TO/xats, IpuTOs 8' ev£7rA.)jo-£ TraVTa.^ 

V a / -^ /I 12 

Ta aTUTTOJTa TVTrouo'Pat. 
(Tfirjvco'a'iv ioiKviai (jiepovTai, pr]yvvp,evai 
KotTjiOv irepL (riapjicn?^ 
a vovs Xfyet, Tto voEti/ S^tou AfyEt.^* 
90 ■q ij.iv yap Svya/xii (tvv EKEtVots, vols 8' ott' iKiivov.^ 


iroXXai jxiv aiSe iire/ilSaLVOvcn <f}aeivoii Kocr/iots,'" 
ivOptaa-Kovo-ai, Kal iv als aKpOTrjTes laatv TpEts.^' 

^ aw6(rTpo(pov pro MdTpoipov, KroU. » irepi TrJp avvi(ffii.iov, Kroll. 

2 ^j pro eis, Kroll. lo Proo. in Parm. 769. 7. 

8 j-iioi/ ?fa., Kroll. Dam. i. 154. 16. u Proc. in Timss. 219 B. rh ndpra, 

* Proc. in Timse. 267 D ; Dam. ii. Patric. 

16. 20 ; 57. 26. 12 Simplio. in Arist. Phys. 143 (p. 613, 

6 Proo. in Timse. 242 D. ^x^i rh poeTv ed. Diels). 

TTarpiKhv vovv (nal v6ov) iviiSivai iriaais ^^ Proo. in Timse. 267 F. 

iTTiyaij Tt Kol opxais KaX Sivuv aid Te " Psell. 1145 B. 

K.T.\., sic reote Kroll. is ^„e/„^ pro iicdvoa, Kroll. Proo. in 

^ aW' 6i'0fjLa asjivlv KaX aKoi.ii.i\T<f, theol. Platon. 365. 1 ; in Alcib. prim. 

Kroll. ivSpiidKinv, Patric. Proo. in 392. 7. 

Crat. 23. 20. ' Leg. ij pro Sj. is ^^v 5j, aY5e, Kroll. 

* Sea-fuf "EpwTos oyjjToC f)s 4k k.t.A.., 1' Kal om. Kroll. Dam. ii. 88. 3. 


viroKarai avraii a.p\ioi avKwv} 

ap)(aL';, at TraTpos epyi vo'qcracrou vorjTa.,' 
95 ala-OrjTols cpyois, Kal (rii>fia(7i.v AirCKaXvij/av,^ 

SiaTTOpB/xioi icTTuiTK <j>d.vai Tco Trarpl kol rrj vXy, 

Koi TO. £/A<^av7 p,ip.riixxiTa tSv a.^vu>v epya^ofievai. 

Koj, T a.(j>avrj eis Trjv ip-tjiavrj Kocr/WTrouav iyypa.<fiovTii. 

vovi TraTpos ^ppoiip/jtrt, voijtras aKjuaSi jSodXtj 
100 irap.iJiopfjjov's tSeas. irjyy^s 8' diro juias d7ro7rTa(7at 

iiiOopov. TraTpoOev yap trjv /SouXij t£ teXos Te.* 

8i (01/ (rvi/diTTCTai T<3 Trarpi, aWrjv Kar oXKtjv 

([co^v, diro iJLtpi^op,iv<Dv oxetSv.* 

dAA' lp,i.pi(7B-q(Ta.v, voep<5 irvpl ixoipyjOticrai, 
105 as dXXas voepds " /cocr/u,a> yap avaf TroXv/JLopKJxa 

TrpovOrjKW voepov tvttov a(f>OiTov, ov Kara KovfLov 

iKvos eirEtyo/xevos p.op'^rj'; Kad' a KOO'p.o's i<f>dv6riJ 

TravTOMis iScats Ke^fapitr/jLevos, cSi/ ju.ta trriyq, 

i^ ^s jOOi^oBvrat juE/z.epto'juei'ai oXXat, 
110 oirXaTOt, p-qyvvp.eva.1 Kocr/jiov irepl crdfjuxcnv, 

at TTcpt KoXirovs o'p.epSaXeovs, (Tp,T^ve<T(Tiv ioiKvuu, 

(fiopiovTaL TpaTTOvcrai ' irepl 8' dp.<|^t aXXv8ts aXXij, 

evvotai voEpal Trijy^s TrarptK^s oiTro 

TToXii SpaTTO/xevai irupos avBoi 
115 a.KOip.rJTOv -xpovov. o.Kp,ri ap^iyovav t8£as^' 

TtpuiTr] rraTpos I^Xvcre TaaS' avToSaX^s Trryyq. 

voovp,afai tvyyes irarpoOar voiovui koI avrai, 

jSovXais di^fleyKTOtort Kivovp,evai toore vo^trai." 

1 Dam. ii. 88. 7. iTOKeK\iTot, KroU. i" irouA.i5 | SptTrriJyttccoi, KroU sec. 

Alii aii^wx (cf. Simplic. in Arist. Phys. Thilo. 

145, p. 623, ed. Dlels). ^^ ok^P | cipxfy6vovs, Kroll. 

^ Toi voijTa, Kroll. [KroU. 12 pgell. 55-56, in comment. oilfuTyci 

' Dam. ii. 200. 23. a/iipeKi\<nl/av, vooi/ievai ■KaTp66ev. cujtOeyTois, Kroll. 

* de ^iiasj Kroll ; fjnas &-tro waffai, con- 0ov\wv atpBsyrcovj comment, per has 
ieoit Schneck apud Kroll. Proc. in iuyyas (cf. Kroll, p. 41) a Laevio frag. 
Parm. 800. 11. 10 ed. Miiller, Lips. 1892 inter 'omnia 

* Om. has lineas duas Kroll. philtra ' laudatas, conatur Pater ani- 
5 o5 icar' &Ko<Tiiov pro 06 Karb. Kiafiov, mam humanam reducere. hand aliter 

Kroll. ' fifTa pro Koff &, Kroll. apud Theocritum Idyl. ii. inoantat 

" Kexap'ip-fvos pro Kexapur/iems, Kroll. pharmaceutria : 

5 (TTpiTTTovaai pro rpawoSffai, Kroll J^y^^ j'^^e ^i r^yoy 4iihv ttotI Sufia rhv 
sec. Thilo. irepl '•' 4/401 irapaaxfShy lii/Spoy. 

&\\vSiS, Kroll. 



e^ avTOv yap iravrei iKdpiSaKOVcn. 
120 a.p.u\iKTOi T£ Kepawol Kal irptja-T-qpoSoxoL koXttoi 

Trafi.(j)£yyi(K oAk^s iraTpoyei/oCs EKaTr;s, 

Koi VTTC^toKoi TTVpbs a.v9os ^8e Kparaiov 

7rv£Ufia irdXoJV, irvpimv circfCEiva. 

<f)povpw av TTpyjO'Tyjpcnv cots aKporrjTa^ eoaiKCv, 
125 eyKepacras oAk^s tStov /j.€tos ev (Twoxevcriv.'' 

to Trios €;yet koct-jhos voepoijs d.vo;:^as aKa/XTrei^. 

oTi epyaris, ort ckSotis ecrrt Trvpoi ^unjipopov, 

oTt Kai TO tfmyovov TrXrjpol t^s EKaxTys KoXirov, 

Kat l-mppu TOis crwvop^eBo-iv oAk^v ^cCSoipov Tupos 
130 fjiiya 8vvapevoto. 

aXXa KOL ct>povpol Tuiv epywv eicrt toS irarpo';. 

a<jiop.oiOL yap Kal eavTOv, CKeivos e?r£tyo/A£vos 

Tov Twov TrcpLJSaXXtaOai tuiv eiSwXeov. 

oi jU.ei' reA,€Tapp(ai (rvvuXfiTrrai tois o"Dvop^£u(n. 
135 Tois 8e TTvpbs voepov voepots TrprjcrTrjpu-Lv 

awavTa einaOe SovXcvovra. 

aXXa Kal vXaiots otra SouAeijet o-wvOT^eScriv. 

£(r(rayu,€vou TravTEW^ov oAk^v c^cotos KcAaSovTOS 

(IAkij TpiyXi)(<o vooi' \jiv)(yiv ff oirXicravTa 
140 iravTOtixSos a~vv6ifjp,a jSoAAetv tfipevl,^^ 

pLrfS' iin<l>otTav ip.Trvpm's cnropdSrjv 6)(£tois, 

aXXa <TTil3aprjB6v. 

oi 8e Ta aTop,a Kal alcrdriTa Srip.iovpyova't, 

Kal (7U)p,aToaS^ Kal KaTaTtTayp,iva tts vXrjv. 

1 ToOSe 86 4Kepif<rKov(riv a/isiKucroi Ts " Proc. In Timse. 128 B. 
K.T.X., KroU. 7 Proc. in Theol. Plat. 205. 

2 avyi)! pro dAK^s, KroU. Hecaten, ^ proc. in Timse. 103 E-P. 
quae a Proolo Hymn. vi. 1 SeCit/ fiijTep ' Dam. de prinoip. 234. 
appellator, una cum Rhea a Platoniois i° Dam. ii. 87. 21. 
confusam esse demonstrat KroU, pp. ii Dam. ii. 87. 21. 

27-31 (cf. p. 69). 12 Dam. i. 155. 11. ^(rffdy-epov, iK^-h", 

8 Proc. in Crat. 63. 4 ; 85. 22 ; Dam. Kroll. 
ii. 89. 31 ; 133. 3. 13 Dam. i. 254. 1 ; ii. 62. 29 ; 95. 23. 

* Dam. ii. 125. 22. rpiyKAxifi. pro TpiyKixfi KroU. 

^ Psell. 57, Tras (yap) pro Si iras, ** ttS;/ rpidSos pro vavroiaSos, Kroll. 

Kroll. S, omis. comment. 


145 oTTi <pv)(r] TTvp Svvd.fJi.ei Trarpbi ovcra (Jmuvov, 

aOdvaTOi T£ /tevei Kai ^(o^s SecTTroTts icrriv 

Kal L(r)(ei. KocrfLOv woXXa. irXtipw/jLaTa koXttuiv. 

vov yap fX,[jM)iJM ireXet, to 8e Te)(ffkv e^" Ti (twiuxto^? 

Ii,iyvvfi,ivu>v 8' 6\erS>v, irvpbs a.'jyOiTov epya reXovcra. 
150 jaera 8^ -irarpiKo.'S BiavOMi i/'ux^> ^y^) ''""^ ' 

Oepfi.'q, tf/v^ovda to, iravTa." KareOero yap 

vovv fiev ivl ^v)(7J, fpvxfjv 8' en (Tui/xaTi dpy<S 

rjfiiwv iyKariBrjKe Trar-rjp avSpdv re Beuiv tc. 

apSrjv ipApvypvaa <jido^, 'irvp, aWipa, KoapiOvisJ 
155 crwuc^tb-TaTat yap to, (jiva-iKo. epya t<S voepw (f>eyya 

Tov iraTpo's? <pv^ yap 17 Koaix-qtracra tov p.iyav 

ovpavov Kal KO<Tfxov(Ta /xeTO. tov irarpoi, 

Kepara 8e Kal avTrji ia-TrjpiKTai. avu).^ 

vu>TOK S' dja^i ^eas <j>v<ni airXeroi yiap-qTai}" 
160 ap^Ei 8' av <^vtns a.Kap,dTrj Kocr/xov re Kat tpyaiv, 

ovpavos o^pa derj hpop-ov aiSiov Karacrvpuiv ' 

Kal Ta^vi •^eXtos Trepl Kevrpov, ottcds e^as iXdrj. 

/Jirj <f)V(Te(0'S ip.jSXajyrj': eliJbapp,ivov owo/xa T^crSi. 


o iroii/T^s OS avTovpywv reKraivecrOai rov Kocrfxov. 
165 Kat yap Tts irvpos oyKOi t-qv erepoi " Ta Sc vrai/Ta ' 
avTOvpySiv, iva <tS>ijux, to koct/jlikov iKToXviKvOrj, 
KOCTjUOS iv' €(c8jy\os, Kai fJirj (jiaivijO i/A£V(o8jys. 
TOV o\ov k6<tp,ov ck TTvpos Kat uSaTOs Kat y^s' 
Kat wavTorpotjiov aXOpij^?^ 

1 Psell. 22-24. ifn tf/vxii vvp oZaa ' Alii legunt Kpirri. 

(paeivhi/ Svviim iraTpSs, comment. M Proc. in Timse. 4 D ; in Parm. 821. 

2 exf pro ifo-xf'i comment. 5 ; in Remp. 22. 17. 

» Proc. in Timae. 87 B. vov /ih ykp, " Proc. in Tima. 4 D, cf. 323 B ; 

KroU. Dam. ii. 157. 15. yiip pro 5' aS, Kroll. 

* Proc. in Remp. 399. 33. i^ proc. theol. Plat. 817. 29 ; de prov. 

s Proc. in Timse. 124 D. e^pp-f, Kroll. 155. 26 ; 164. 7 ; in Timae. 322 D. 

^ S^ffas pro Ti/ieav, KroU. Proc. in ^^ leg. iis pro hs TeKTrlvaro, Stan. 

Timse. 124 D. ^* raSe pro tA 5e, Kroll. om.^ap, Patric. 

^ Simplic. 143 (p. 613, ed. Dials). i^ ii SSaros, Kroll. 

8 Proc. in Timse. 106 A, C. i^ proo. in Timse. 154 E. 


170 T apprjTa Kal to. prjTo. (jvvO'qixa.Ta Tov Koafi,ov. 

aXX.rjv Kar aWrjv ^u>7jv (XTro fjiepi^ofjievcov 6)(£tS>v. 

avoiOev ShJkoi'tos iirl to Kar avTiKpv 

Sio. TOV KevTpov T^s y^s Kal 7re/X7rT0i/ jnecroi', aWov 

7rvpi^o)(ov, ev6a Ka,T£i(Ti /-iexP' i'^"""'' 6)(iTS>v, 
175 ^(arj<j>opiov irvp. 

KivrpM iTrLairip^(Oiv cravTov <^a)Tos keXoooi'TOs. 

TTT/yaiov aXXov, os Tor iiJ,TTvpLov Kocrp-ov ayct. 

KtvTpov d<^' ou TTOLfTai. jtie^P'S avTvyos tcrai ladLv.* 

(TvpfioXa yap TrarptKOS voos icnrtipc Kara, KO(rp,ov. 
180 p.€(Tov TUiv iraripuiv eKaarrj'; Kivrpov (j^optirai.^ 

vov yap p-Lp-qpa irtXei ' to St rex^*" ^X^' " "''i'/tiTOS. 


eTTTci yap i^uiyKuxrc Trarijp o'TCpew/xaTa KOtrp-w, 

TOV ovpavov KvpT<S <T)(rjpaTi, ■'a^, 

TT^ii 8e iroXvv opiXov atxripiav a,TrXavu>v,^ 
185 ^iiiiav Si TrXavop-ivuiv v(t>€crTrjKev inTaSa.^ 

yrjv 8' iv piato tl6cI^, vSmp 8' iv yatas koXttois, 

^€pa 8 avw^ev tovtwv. 

TTTj^e 8e Kai ttoXvv opiXov d(TT€pii>v dirXavSi',' 

jU.?/ Ta(n CTrtTTOva) irovrjpa. 
190 TTTj^u Sc TrXdvrjv ovK k^ovtrtj cf>ipe<Tdai, 

fTrr/ie 8e Kat woXiii' opiXov axTripiov arrXavuiv 

TO Trip IT/DOS TO irBp evayKatras, 

TT^^et wXdvrjV ovk i^ova-Q <f>ipea-dai. 

ei avTovi; vwia-TTqaev, €l3Sop.ov •^eXtbu '" 
195 jU.e<7£/A/3oX'^o-as irBp, 

TO OTaKTOv avrSv evTaKTOts avaKpepacra^ l^uvats. 

TtKTet ya/) ^ dea rjiXiov TC /xcyav /cat XajUTrpav creXiJj'j/v. 

aW-^p, ijXte, TTveiJ/xa o'fXiJvTys, ijcpos dyot', 

i^XiaKuiv T£ kvkXwv, Kal prjvaiwv Kava)(i.cTpli>v 

1 Proo. in Tims. 172 C. (aiirpopov, « Simplio. in Arist. Phys. 144 (p. 616, 
Patrio. ed. Diels). 

2 Proc. in Timse. 236 D. tavrhv, Stan. ' TTTtyvivai, KroU. 

s Proo. in Timse. 8 ^^^^^ _ _ , ^uttAvuv, KroU. Proo. 

* Proc. in Euclid, i. def. 15-16 (p. in Timse. 97 A. 
155, ed. Friedlein). (Patrio. tivTuxiv.) » Proo. in Timse. 280 E, ubi tamen 

^ Dam. ii. 164. 18. /ueWoi/, 'ExtiTjjr, xp^f-^'""" P^o (pep^rBai legitur. 
jre^op^o-fei, KroU. lo Proc. in Timse. 280 B. 


200 KoXiTutv re -^epiwv. 

aWprji jHcXos, ^iXiov re Kal fx-qv-qi 6)(eT(ov, ^ re rjipiK ^ 

KoX irXa.TV'i arip, p.rjval6<; rt Spo/ios, Koi det iroAos ^eXtoio.^ 

<n)AA,£yei avTO Xaju.ySai'OVcra aWpi]'S fiiXoi,^ 

^eXiov TC (reki^vrj'S t£ Kai oca ytpi (rvvi\ovTai. 
205 irvp TTvpoi i^ox^TCuiJ.a koj, irupos rap.tas.'' 

j^aiTat yap es o|ii TTd^nKOTt ^wrt pXhrovTox? 

evda Kpoi/os, 

^eXtos TraptSpos iwicrKOTrewv ttoXov ayvov.^ 

aidipw's T£ Bpoixoi Kal /jajvri'S aTrAeros opju^ 
210 ■qepioi re poaiJ 

■^eXiov T£ fiiyav KaX Xa[i,Trpav treX'^vrjV, 


tfeov lyKociuov, alwviov, OTripavTOV, 

viov Kal irpecr^vTrjv, IXixociS^. 

Kai TnjyaToi' oAAov, os rov ifiirvpiov Kocr/xov aya, 


215 )(pyj <7£ (TTTivSav irpb'S to <^aos /cat irpos irarpoi avyas 
iv6iv iTr€iJ.<j)$r] crot ^v)(rj ttoAvv k<T(TaiJ.evq vovv? 
TavTa Trarrjp ivorjcre, jSpoTos S' ol iij/v)((OTO.^ 
(Tv/jL^oXa yap TraTpiKos voos iv€<nrape rais i/'u^ais,^" 
£po)Tt paOei dvaTrAijcras T^v \j/v)(i^v. 

220 KariOtTO yap vovv iv ^i^XOt ^^ (yuifiaTi §£ 
Vjufas iyKaTtdrjKC Trarrjp avSpiov re 6eSv r£. 
d(7U)/u.aTa //.£V ecTTt Tct ^Eia TravTa, 
(TiofxaTa 8 £1/ avTois v/xSv £I'£K£1' Ei/SeSfTat ^^ 
ju,^ 8vva/A£v(0]/ Karao-p^Eiv d<T0jp.dT0us rfii' cr<i>iJ,aTmv,^ 

^ /ifpos iie\tov Ti (an fiivos?}, Kroll. ' Proc. ap. Simpl. 614. 2. 

^S' pro ^ re, Kroll. 8 pgeU. 13.14. 

2 oeiTToAos pro ae! Tr6\os, Kroll. Proc. ' Proc. in Timse. 336 A. Se ot, 

in Tim*. 257 E. Kroll. 

" Proc. in Timae. 311 A. a-vWeyeiv, 1° Psell. 49 comment, omis. 7^^ et 

\a/i0dvovirav, /iipos, Kroll. Tors, et legit eo-Treipe. 

« Proc. in Timse. 141 P. " Sh pro 5" iv, Kroll. 

^ Proc. in Remp. 387. 43. ^ev post ^ n^T-aaxfiv, kaanirus tSiv curandTav, 

XaiVai, inserit Kroll et legit ttc^/jiki^ti. Kroll. 

6 Proc. in Timse. 279 F. i,e\ioio, 


225 Sia rrjv a-ai/jLaTiKrjv eh 17V iveKCVTpiirOrjTC i^utnv.' 

iv 8e 6t<S KtiVTM Truptroiis fX.KOV<Tai aK/u-aiovs 

tK TrarpoOev KaTiWTCs, d<^' wi' '/'^X^ KartdvTwv ' 

IfiTropCwv 8piirCTaL Kaptrtov, ypv^orpo^ov avflos. 

810 Koi voijcracrai Ta epya ToC irarpos 
230 p-oiprji'; to irTcpov <j>ivyova-Lv dvatScs. 

Kav yap TiJvSe \j/v)(rjv tSgs diroKaracrTacrai', 

oXX' aXAr/v ivCi](n ■tra.Trjp lvapi6p,iov eivai. 

■q p.dXa Br] Keivai ye paKapTarai cf o^a ira(7eo)v 

\jiv)(a(i)v, TTOTL yaiav air oipavoOev Tcpoy^eovTai. 
235 Kelvai oX^Lai re kol ov (^ara v^ixara Ixoucrai.^ 

ocrcrat aar' aiyXryevTOS, dva^, creOev, rj 8e Kol avTOV 

£K Aios i^tyevovTO jxiTOv Kpareprji vtt dmy/C7;s. 

Tjyela-du) ^vyrj^ |8d^os ap-PpoTcni, 0/A/x.aTa 8' apStjv 

irdvTa iKiriraTov dV(o7 
240 /ii^T£ Kara) vcvcrgs ets Tov /xeXavauyca KOtTjXOV^ 

(S J3v06^ aiev aincrTO's vTri<TTpii>Tac re Kat At8?ys 

aP'<i>i'Kve<f>ri<;, pvirotov, eiSuy\o)(a.pi^';, dvoijTOS, 

Kprjp.vwSr)';, crKoXtos, Tojpov (SdOo? aiev eXicra-wv,^" 

ael vvp,(j>evwv d<^av£S 8t/*as, dpyov, a.irvevjX.ov. 
245 Kai o /xLtrotfiavr]^ Kotr/ios Kat to, o"KoXia peWpa 

v<l> oiv TToXXoi KaracrwpovTat.^^ 

^■^TYjcrov TrapaSeicrov?^ 

Si'feo o-ii i/^X^S dxeToi/, o^cv ^ TtVi rd^ct ^^ 

(TuipaTi 6rjTev(Tai, eirl rd^iv d.<j> ^s eppvq<i * 
250 av^is dvacTTiycrets, tepw Xoycu epyov evulcas. 

/iiyre KaTo) v£u(rj;5, Kprjp.vo'; Kara yijs vnoKeiTai, 

eiTTairopov (jvpwv /caTa j8a^/xt8os ' i^v wo 

I Proc. in Kemp. 359. 23 B. 12 proc. in Timse. 339 B. fiurofa^s, 
''■ /caTidi/Tos, KroU. 01 TtoWoi, KroU. 

8 Proo. in Timse. 321 A. is Psell. 25. 

* iraffay, Kroll. 1* ["«'] pro "'"i comment. Sifrjai 

^ 6\SiiTTai, vfiiiaT, Kroll. "f'l'x^'i Kroll. 

° Synes. de insomn. 151 C. i^ at/)' ^s ippi-ns, om. comment, et 

' Psell. 37-38. oiyviaSai, Kroll. o/i- Kroll, qui legit 9riTiiira.<i' et coni. vne&i) 

/j-ara Se TrdvTa \ ^pSriv^ comment. Kal irws. 

" firiSi pro /n^Tc, KroU. w leis pro oSffis, comment. Psell. 

^ Sic Dam, Synes., d/iopfos InreffTpai- 1-6. 

Toi ical ifiS^s. 1' ^<) [5e] pro M'i''e, comment, n^i 

i» TTTjpi^, Kroll. (S^), Kroll. 

II Dam. ii. 317 (Synes. de insomn. is {,^' ^^ j ^^^ | aniy/cris, comment, et 
138 C). , Kroll. Psell. 4-6. 

Scivijs dvayxTjs Opovoi Io'Tlv, 

255 ^v)(yj y /xepoTrmv Otbv ay$(.L ttcSs ds favriqv? 

ovhiv OvrjTov l;!(OU(ra, oXrj 6e66ev fiiixiOvtrrat? 

dp/jyOvtav av)(ei yap iij> y TreXe aSifW. ^partiov. 

eKTeiva's nvpiov vovv tpyov iir eicre^crji, 

pivcTTov Kal (rSt/jLa crauStrets.' 
260 eo-Ti Kal ttSiiXo) fitph eis tottov d/i<^t<^aovTa.^ 

irdvTodev aTrXa,(rT(0 if/v)(y irvpbi ijvta retj/ov.' 

o TTvpiOaXTrrj'i ivvoia TrpaiTLcrTrjv e;)(ei Togiv. 

T<S TTvpi yap jSjOOTos 6/xireAaa'as OeoOev <f>ao's l^«.' 

Sij^uvovTt yap /SporiS Kpanrvoi p.aKapi's TeXidovcnv.^ 
265 at TTOivat /xepcnrtav ayKTCipai 

Kal TO. KaKTji vXtji; /SXatrT^/iara )(pir](TTa Kat iaOXd. 

iXms Tpe^iro) ere Trvpijo^os dyyeXiKcp en ^tapw.^ 

aXX' ovK €i(rSi)(eTaL Keivr/s to OiXuv TrarpiKO'S vovi, 

p-^Xpii av i^eXOy X-qdrj'i Kai prj/j.a XaXi^crjy. 
270 iJ,vqfJ,rjv ivBcp.evr] TrarpiKov avvOi^/xaTO'; dyi/oC" 

TOts 8e SiSaKTOi/ <^doi)s IBwKe yvol/oicr/xa XafiiaOai. 

roiis Se vTi/toovras e^s ivcKapiricrtv oAk^s. 

/*^ TTvetijUa jU,oXvi/)js, jUijSe j3a6vvy]'S to eiTLTreSov. 

juiySe TO T^5 vArys (rKv/iaXov Kpr/p^viS KaraXeii/'iys. 
275 ;ii^ e^d^gs, iva jU,^ e^ioScra Ip^i; Tt. 

ySiij OTt aZ/jLa Xt,ir6vT(iiv ipv)(a.l KaOapiaTarai-. 

tj/v)^'i i^oicrTTJpK, avdirvooi,, evXvTOi clcnv. 

Xatrjtr iv Xaydtriv 'ExaTr/s d/jer^s rrcXe Tj^y^ '' 

1 Psell. 8. (Tvvav^^crris, comment. ii Olymp. in Phsed. 31. 21 ; 34. 3. 

2 Comment, omis. ri et ttSs. out^i/, i'^ Psell. 10-12. Omis. comment, rh 
KroU. eeXetv. 

" eeieey, cm. comment. is Synes. de insomn. 135 A. 5i5ai£Tiic 

* Psell. 19-21. eSaice (pdovs, KroU. Kal post Sf, inser. 

6 Psell. 30-31. eiffeffias, Kroll ; Kroll. 
viptvov, Stanl. 1* Psell. 26. Tovirl-ireSoii, KroU. 

6 Psell. 27. 15 Psell. 28. oi5^ KaTaA€(i|/€is, Kroll. 

' Psell. 45. 16 Psell. 29 ; of. Plotinus Enneades, 

8 Proc. in Timae. 65 B (uti legitur i. 9. In comment, i^iri ix°^'"^ ti. 
T^v TrvpiOaK-jrij ^vvoiav 'jTpcaTiaTT}v ex^iv 1^ Psell. 1141 B. KaTdparot, coniec. 

Td^iv). Kroll. 

' Proc. in Timss. 65 D. Omis. yiip, i^ Psell. 16. avdirvoes, comment, et 

KroU. KroU. 

10 PseU. 36. 1' \aip iv \ay6iriv koIttis, PseU. 


tvoov oXrj ixtfivovca, to TrapOevov ov irpoitltra. 
280 <o ToXfjnjpOTaTrj^ (j>varc<j}i avOpunre T£)(ya<T/ia,^ 

/u.^ TO, ireXiLpta fjierpa yairj's vwo (rrjv <l>peva, fSaWov, 

ov yap aXrjBeirji <f>VTov ivl x^°vl? 

IJ.yJTe /jitTpii jj-irpa ■^eXiov Kavovas (JwaSpOLtrw;^ 

a.ihi(o jiovXrj <f>€pCTai oip^ ei/exa aiio? 
285 firjvalov re Spo/irj/Jia Koi acrripiov TrpOTropOev/jux. 

IXT^VYji pdi^ov tao-ov, da 'rpej(a «P7¥ oLvdyKr}^ 

a(TT€piov trpoTropOtvpja,, (ridev X^^P'" °^'' i\o)(e.v0riJ 

aWipioi opvtOdiv Tapcro'; TrAariis ovttot dXr]6rj'S. 

oil 6v(n!av uirXayxytav re TO/xaC' raS' aOvp/JLara Travra/ 
290 ifji,TropiKrjs a.Tra.Tij's (TTrjpiyfUiTa ' cf>cvy£ av rajra 

/tcWwv eva-e^Lri^ tepbv TrapaSetcrov dvotyetv, 

(v9' apery] (TO<j>ia tc Kal ewo/ita (TvvdyovTaL.^ 

<t6v yap ayytiov Orjpti )(dovo'S OLKTjKovcnv.^'' 

avToiis Si )($(i)v KaroSvperai es rcKva fji,i)(pi's.^^ 


295 ^ <^ucris TTuOti etvai tows Sat/xavas dyi/ous, 

Kal TO. KaKJjs uXt/s pXacTTrjuaTa y^p-qcTTO. Koi ecrSXd.^ 
dXXoL TaCra iv d/JaTots tr^KOts Stavouxs dreXtTTO). 
TrSjO tKcXov CTKipTijSov i'TT rjipo% oiS/xa rtratvov,^ 
?; Kai TTvp aTVTtinTov oOev (jxiivrjv irpoOiovtrav, 

300 7j <j>Cis irXovtrtov dfi<jiiyaT^v, pot^aiov, iXi^Oev ' ^* 
dXXa Kai tTTTTOv iSeti/ <^coros irXe'oi' aarpaTTTOVTa, 
7) Koi iraiSa rtols vwrots iTroypv/J-tvov iTTTrov,^" 

* * ** '*\/ IB 

ffiirvpov rj )(pv(Tto TreTrvKafTfuvov rj waMyvfx.vov 

1 fifvovffa et vapBiviov, comment. ' Psell. 1128 B. C. 

Psell. 17-18. 10 Psell. 7. Comment, omis. 7^^. 

2 Psell. 39. ToKfivpas iK, comment. " Psell. 15. acl roicrSe ... 5 5 roia-Se, 
' fV pro ^i/l, KroU. KroU. KaTupveTai, comment. KardpiKrat, 

• fiTjSf pro ju^Te, PseU. et KroU ; Patric. 

fierpov, KroU. 12 Psell. 34-35. in comment, inserit 

* irarphs post <p€peTai, Psell. et KroU. TTicTTiiiiv post TreWei. 

(7oD, KroU. PseU. 1128 B, C. 13 Proc. in Remp. 380. 6. 

« Proc. in Timas. 277 D. TpoTr6pev/j.a, " kfi^upah, Stan. Lips. o;tt(()i yuVi 

KroU et Psell. KroU. 

' Proc. in Timse. 277 D, et PseU. w Melius KroU, floois pro Teorj. 

1128 B, C. vpoTr6pevfta, KroU et PseU. i« ira\i yvfi.v6v, KroU. 

' iTofiat, Patric. ; SSo/iai, Stanleius. 


rj Kol ToievovTa Kal larSira iirl vioTots.^ 
305 iroWaKts rjv Xe'^s /xot, aBpridW TrdvT a)(XvovTa '^ 

avT£ yap oipdvLO'S KvBpo^ tote (f>atvcTai oyKOs.^ 

a<TTepes ov \6.p.wov(n, to p-r/vq^ 0Ss KeKoXv-KTti, 

xOtav ov)(^ eWijKEv, pXeirtraC re Travra Kipa.vvoi's.* 

p,7j <J3vutws KaXicrys aVTOirrov ayaXjua/ 
310 ov yap )(pr] Kuvov; ere ^Xiwuv nplv aSipa riXtaBrj. 

OTi Tas ij'V)(a'S OiXyovTCi ael tuiv tcXctZv dirayovcriv.^ 

£K 8 apa KoXiroiv yan/s OpwcrKovai ^(Oovioi Kwes, 

OVTTOT aXrj&li aCypju. fSporw avSpl 8aKv6vTKJ 

ivepyei irtpl tov 'EKart/cov a^Tp6(f>aXov.' 
315 ovopara fidp^apa prproT dAAaf j/s,^ 

eio-t yap ovopara Trap £Ka<7T0ts ^eocrSoTa 

Swa/itv ev TeAerais apprjTOv i)(0VTa. 

ijvtKa j8\ei/'3S pop^rji arep cvUpov irvp ^^ 

Xa/ATTO/ievov aKiprrjSbv oXov Kara jUvOta Koap-ov, 
320 kXv6l TTvpb's (fxovT^v. 

TiVLKa Saipova 8' ip-)(6pevov Trpocryuov dOprjcrrj';, 

6ve XtOov pv'iiCpvpiv eTravSGv.^* 

etcrt Trdvra in^pos evos e/cyeyaSra.^^ 

Trarrjp ov (jio^ov ivOpioaKei, TTuOoi 8 l7rt;Y£ij£t.i' 

1 ea-rriSiT, KroU. Kroll. sub voce iivliovpiv suspioor 

2 Trai/To xiovTa pro TtirTr) Xein6v, forsan corruptionem part. pass. arab. 

comment. iriivT-n x^htSv, Psell. Nos t. ". ,^ --, ^„ „„„!,„ t. . 

sec. Kroll. ^^jij-~v v jjl^ 

2 Kvprhs pro KvSphs, comment, et (reazar) ' videre ' sublatere. si hoc 

Kroll. recte se habet, de sententia confer 

* Psell. 40-44. (pAeyerai, melius Kroll. Geoponica xv. 1. 8: 6 Xi)kos irpoopCiv 

^ Psell. 1136 C. Thv iLvSptiiTTOv &a6ev4(7Tepov airbv Kal 

^ Proo. in Ale. 340. 6. T^Xca-Bfis, dipoimv iroieT . . . d(p8eh Sk vpSrepos 6 

Kroll. XiiKos airbs d,(r6evi(TTepoi yiveTai, verba 

' Psell. 32-33. oVt, comment. Om. ex Unguis orientalibus in incantamen- 

i.vSp\ in comment. Alii, e/c S' ipa. k6\- tis huiusmodi frequentissime usurpari 

Trai;/ yalris BpdxrKova', oUttot aAijfles | arj/ia docet Heim in Annal. Philol. Suppl. 

0poTf avSpl x^i5yioi ((lives SeiKvivres. xix. (1892) p. 528, qui etiam exem- 

8 Psell. 1133 A. pla multa 'E0ea-iwc ■ypan/w.Tui' profert 

9 Psell. 1132 C. pp. 529-542. 
i» (5^), Kroll. Psell. 46-48. 12 Psell. 52. 
11 Psell. 1148 B. livoi^tpiv iiriSuv, 18 Psell, 60. 




1. Armenian Allusions. 

2. Chinese Allusions. 

3. Sykiac, Arabic, and other Mohammedan ok Persian References. 

4. Icelandic Allusion. 

Allusions to Zoroaster in Armenian Literature 

The references to Zoroaster in. Armenian literature, so far as I 
know, are few, but otlier scholars may be able to add to the list. 
Those allusions easiest to be found are in Langlois, Collection des 
Historiens anciens et modernes de VArminie, 2 vols., Paris, 1867- 
1869; see tome i. pp. 28, 29; ii. pp. 69, 69, 189, 191, n., 230 (377), 
381. These references are used here in part. 

(a) The So-called Armenian History of Khorene. 
— The chapters of the so-called Armenian history of Moses of 
Khorene which refer to Zoroaster give the same or a similar record 
as Cephalion and others '■ in associating his name with Semiramis. 
Zoroaster is a Magian and religious chief of the Medes. Semiramis 
gives into his charge the government of Assyria and Nineveh, and 
entrusts to him the greatest power, while she withdraws to her favor- 
ite city in Armenia. Zoroaster raises a rebellion against Semiramis, 
and the issue of the war is told. 

Several translations of Moses or of this passage are accessible : 
Whiston, Moses Ghorenens., London, 1736, 1. ch. 16 (quoted in MuUer's 
Frag. hist. Or. iii. p. 627, and in Gilmore, Persika of Ktesias, Lon- 
don, 1888, p. 30, n.) ; Langlois, Collection des Historiens anciens et 
modernes de VArminie, Paris, 1867-1869, tome ii. 59, 69; cf. ibid. i. 

1 E.g. Agathias ; cf. Hyde, Hist. Belig. vet. Pers. p. 412. 


p. 28 (Mar Apas Catina, ch. 10) ; Lauer, Moses von Chorene, Geschichte 
Gross-Armeniens ubersetzt, Eegensburg 1869, p. 13 seq. The sources 
are discussed by Carriere, Nouvelles sources de Moise de Khoren, 
Vienna, 1893 ; cf. also Vetter in Festgruss an Both, p. 81 seq. 

For a rendering of tlie passages, in which Zoroaster is alluded to 
in Moses of Khorene, I am indebted to the kind help of my col- 
league, Mr. Abraham Yohannan, of Columbia University, whose 
version is here given for convenience. 

Mos. Khor. 1.6 [in speaking of Zrvan and basing the narrative on the legen- 
dary Berosian Sibyl, Moses of Khorene alludes to three princes of the earth, 
'Zrvan, Titan, and Japhet' (Zrvan, Didan, Habedost). In his opinion these 
are identical with ' Shem, Ham, and Japhet ' (Sem, Kam, Habet). He then goes 
on to state, upon the authority of the Berosian Sibyl], 'These divided the 
whole world between them. Over the other two, Zrvan gained the nlastery, — 
he, of whom Zoroaster (Zradasht) king of the Bactrians, that is the Medes, 
states that he is the source and father of the gods.' 

Mos. Khor. 1. 17 (16) 'About Semiramis — The reason why she slew her 
sons — How she fled from Zoroaster (Zradasht) the Magian into Armenia — 
And how she was put to death by her son Ninyas (Ninouas); — This queen was 
always accustomed, for her recreation, to pass the summer in the northern 
region, in the fortified city which she had built in Armenia. She left Assyria 
and Nineveh in charge of the governor Zoroaster, a Magian and patriarch of the 
Medes. And having repeatedly done this, she (finally) entrusted the sovereignty 
entirely to him. ' 

' Being herself often rebuked by her sons because of her wanton and meretri- 
cious character, she put them all to death ; only Ninyas (Ninouas) escaped. She 
chose to bestow upon her paramours all the power and treasures, without any 
regard to her sons. Her husband Niuus was not dead, nor buried by her in the 
palace of Nineveh, as is reported ; but he abandoned the realm and fled to Crete, 
because he was aware of her vice and shameless behavior.' 

' It was then that her grown-up sons reminded her of all this in hopes of 
restraining her from her devilish and warlike desires and of having the power 
and treasures entrusted to them. Becoming excessively enraged thereat, she 
killed them all, and only Ninyas remained as we have described above.' 

' But when some misunderstanding occurred on the part of Zoroaster with 
reference to the queen, and enmity arose between the two, Semiramis made war 
against him because he was designing to rule by force over all. In the midst of 
the war Semiramis fled before Zoroaster into Armenia.' 

' At this juncture, Ninyas (her son), taking advantage of the opportunity for 
revenge, killed his mother and reigned over Assyria and Nineveh.' 

(b) Elisaeus, who is presumably a contemporary of Vartan (a.d. 
fifth century), in his history of the latter, and of the wars which the 
Armenians waged against the Persians, alludes incidentally to the 

276 APPENDIX 71 

' Magians,' and the ' religion of Zoroaster ' ; see Langlois, op. cit. ii. 
189, 230. 

(c) The Armenian Eznik (a.d. fifth century,) in his refutation 
of the sects and of heretical opinions, devotes an entire division 
(ii.) of his work to the false tenets of the Persians "who maintain 
the doctrine of Ormazd, Ahriman, and Zrvan, and, in this connec- 
tion, he incidentally mentions ' Zradasht ' (Zoroaster) as responsible 
for the heretical views as to the origin of the sun and moon, cf. 
Langlois, op. cit. ii. 381. Most of this passage is translated in Wil- 
son, Parsi Beligion, pp. 542-551, but not the paragraph relating to 
Zoroaster ; cf. also Haug, Essays on the Parsis, p. 13. 

(d) Thomas Arzrouni, the learned Armenian annalist (a.d. 
ninth-tenth century),^ gives a series of statements regarding Zoro- 
aster and the Persian belief in Ormazd. Some of his allusions are 
identical with the common accounts which associate Zoroaster's name 
with Ninus and Semiramis. One passage is also of importance in con- 
nection with the prescriptions of the Vendidad. It gives a legendary 
explanation of the origin of the injunction which Zoroaster gave for 
killing noxious animals. The passage is to be found translated in 
the valuable publication of Brosset, Collection d'Mstoriens armSniens; 
Th. Ardzrouni, etc., tome i, S. Petersbourg, 1874. As this work is not 
easily accessible and as the passage does not seem to be generally 
familiar to Zoroastrian students, it is worth while to reproduce Bros- 
set's translation (op. cit., livre 1, § 3, pp. 19-22, 26 ; § 4, p. 27). 

1. 3, ' De I'empire des Assyriens ; que Zradacht et Manithop furent chefs des 
contrfes orientales ; leurs dogmes absurdes. 

' Des temps ^ooul^s entre Bel et Ninos, il ne reste dans les livres anciens, 
ainsi que nous I'avons dit pr^c^demment, auoune trace consid&able et ^clatante, 
et oela, sans doute, par plusieurs raisons. D'abord, par suite de la confusion 
des langues, il r^gnait une f§,oheuse m^sintelligenoe, puis les annalistes cbal- 
d^ens ne retra9aient pas les faiblesses des bommes de haut rang. Et encore, 
si m6me les exploits et actes de bravoure de Ninos ont ^t^ racont^s, comme Bel 
et pis encore, il en vint it, un tel degr6 d'orgueil, qu'il se regardait comme le 
premier des h^ros, comme le premier des rois, et ayant fait rassembler en un tas, 
en grande h§,te, tons les Merits anciens, il les livra aux ilammes, afln que par la 
suite il ne restftt plus de souvenir d'autre personne illustre que la sienne.^ II 
passe done pour avoir r^gn6 sur toute I'Asie, I'Inde except^e et sur la Libye. II 
fit aussi r^parer, pour I'honneur de son nom, la ville de Ninive, autrefois con- 
struite par Assour, pour etre la residence royale, et qu'avait ravag^e N6brotb. 
II d^trSna ensuite le mage Zradaoht, roi des Bactriens et des Mfedes, et le chassa 

1 Cf. Neumann, (JescAicftfetZerarmen. "Mr. Gray notes a similar act by 

Lit., pp. 123-125, Leipzig, 1836. Tsin-Chi-hoang-ti. 


jusqu'aux frontiferes des H^plitalites, devint le maitre puissant de tout le 
Khoujastan, des oontrfes de I'orient et de la Perse, jusque par-deli Balkh et 
D^pouhan ; de Comaid, de Gauzpan, de Ch^ribamamaoan, de Khodjihrastan, et 
pour vrai dire, il soumit durant 52 ans, aveo une incroyable valeur, tout le pays 
jusqu'i la mer des Indes. Lorsqu'il mourut, ne laissant que de trfes jeunes 
enfants, il remit I'autorit^ S, sa femme Chamiram, qui I'exerja elle-mgme avec 
plus de vigueur que Mnos ; car elle enceignit Babylone de murailles, dompta la 
rebellion de Zradaoht et le reduisit en servitude. Mais I'ivresse des voluptfe lui 
faisant oublier ses fils, elle prodigua ses trfeors k ses amants favoris et 6tablit 
Zradaoht commandant de Baliylone, du Khoujastan et de toute la Perse 
orientale. Pour elle, elle passa en Arm^nie, ou I'attirait la reuomm^e d'un 
descendant d' Haio. Quant a, son arriv^e en ce pays, aux details de la bataille, 
k la construction de superbes Edifices, veritablement admirables, k la revolte de 
Zradacht, k la mort de Chamiram, aux r^cits des magiciens, k ce sujet, tout cela 
a &t& racont6 par d'autres. Elle avait r6gn6 42 ans. L'autorit6 passa k son fils 
Zarmia, qui fut appel^ Ninovas, du nom de son pfere. Celui-ci fut maitre de 
I'Assyrie et, durant un temps, de I'Arm^nie. Pen soucieux d'agrandissements, 
dou6 d'un caractfere paisible et non belliqueux, il passa tranquillement ses jours.' 

' Cependant Zradacht, poss^dant les contrfes k I'orient de la Perse, cessa 
depuis lors d'inqui^ter I'Assyrie. D^daignant comme vieilleries et choses par 
trop obscures, les r^cits sur Bel et sur les autres descendants des gdnies, il 
d^bita sur son propre compte de nouvelles fables, afin de s^parer du mgme coup 
les Perses et les Mars des Babyloniens, et, par ses doctrines et par des noms, de 
se mettre en communication avec les Assyriens. II se mit done k appeler [de ?] i 
nouveau Zrovan et souche des dieux Sem, fils de No6. "Celui-ci, dit-il, voulant 
devenir pfere d'Ormizd, dit : " Qu'ainsi soit, j'aurai pour fils Ormizd, qui fera le 
ciel et laterre." Zrovan conjutdonc deux jumeaux, dont I'un fut assez rus6 
pour se hater de paraitre le premier, "Qui es-tu? lui dit Zrovan. — Ton fils 
Ormizd. — Mon fils Ormizd est lumineux et de bonne odeur, et toi tu es obscur 
et mauvaise langue." Celui-ci ayant beaucoup insists, il lui donna le pouvoir 
pour mille ans. Ormizd, ^tant n6 au bout de ce terme, dit k son f rfere : " Je 
t'ai c6d6 pendant mille ans ; c6de-moi pr^sentement." Connaissant son inferi- 
ority, Ahrman r&ista et se rdvolta, et devint un dieu oppos6 k Ormizd. Quand 
Ormizd cr6a la lumifere, Ahrman fit les t^nfebres ; quand Ormizd cr6a la vie, Ahr- 
man fit la mort ; quand Ormizd cr^a le feu, le bien, Ahrman fit I'eau et le mal. 
Pour ne point dire tout, I'un apr^s I'autre, tout ce qui est bon et les gens ver- 
tueux proviennent d'Ormizd ; d' Ahrman, tout ce qui est mauvais et les demons. 
Maintenant k celui qui pensera que ces doctrines ne m^ritent qu'une explosion 
de rire, et qui traite de fou le roi Zradacht, r^ponds que ce dieu impuissant, 
Ormizd, ne travaille pas en vain, et que les deux frferes, hien qu'ennemies 
mutuels, se courrouceront k la fois pour I'exterminer.' 

'Le mgme insens^ Zradacht raconte encore qu'une guerre s'^tant ^levde 
entre Ormizd et Ahrman, le premier ^prouva une faim enragde et courut les 
champs, pour trouver de la nourriture. H rencontra un boeuf, qu'il d6roba. 

1 Added by Mr. Schuyler, who also notes from Brosset that Arzrouni always 
writes Ormzd, Ahrmn. 


L'ayant tu^ et cach^ sous un tas de pierres, il attendit le cr^pusoule, pour 
enlever chez lui le produit de son larcin et rassasier sa faim. Le soir venu, il 
^tait tout joyeux et allait se gorger de nourriture, mais il trouva le bcBuf gat^, 
devor6 par les Ifeards, par les araign^es, les stellions et les mouohes, qui avaient 
fait leur proie de son gibier. Maintenant done la legion des cloportes et des 
jjacs vinrent, et comme ils firent beaueoup de mal au dieu, Zradaoht presorivit 
une quantity de rfeglements puerils. Ce n'est point k la l^gfere que nous 
sommes dfeid^ k ^crire ces choses, mais parce que cette doctrine satanique a 
caus6 bien des catastrophes sanglantes k notre Arm^nie, qu'elle a ruin^e entifere- 
ment, ainsi que le fait voir I'histoire des saints Vardanians, ^crite par le v^n^ 
rable prgtre Eghich^. Les fils des pyrolatres sont 1^, pour I'afBrmer encore.' 

' Cependant Manithop, roi des Hephtals, ajoute et afiSrme encore ceci : le feu, 
suivant lui, n'est pas la creature d'Ormizd, mais sa substance. H^phestos et 
Promithos, i.e. le soleil et la lune, ayant d^rob6 le feu d'Ormizd, en donntoent 
une partie aux hommes. La terre est I'asyle du dieu Spandaramet — Bacchus; 
— elle n'a dt6 cr^^e par personne, mais elle existait, telle qu'elle existe; elle 
continue d'gtre, et I'homme est n6 de lui-mgme.' 

Three pages farther on (p. 25) is found another allusion to Zoroaster : ' Quant 
aux autres assertions des mythologues, et k leurs dires sans fondements, j'en 
prendrai, pour le r^futer, ce qu'il y i de plus raisonnable dans les traditions 
confuses, transmises k leurs sectateurs par les orientaux Zradaoht et Manithop.' 

[In the next chapter Thomas Arzrouni summarizes the reigns of the succes- 
sive Assyrian rulers down to the rise of the kingdom of Persia under Cyrus, 
and Zoroaster's death is incidentally mentioned. From the allusions to Ninus 
and Semiramis and Abraham, it is evident that he places Zoroaster at an early 
period. The text runs] : ' Nous avons suivi m^thodiquement la s&ie des gene- 
rations et range avec soin les anc§tres de I'empire d'Assyrie, dont le premier 
heritier fut Zam&os [i.e. Zarmia, plus haut], le mgme que Ninovas, fils de 
Ninus et de Chamiram, en la 53o ann^e de la vie du patriarche Abraham, qui 
regna sur toute I'Asie et I'Arm^nie. Zradaoht etant mort, il fut de nouveau, 38 
ans durant, monarque pacifique de tout ce qui est k I'O. de la Perse, qui lui 
obeit et lui paya tribut. Aprfes lui, son fils Arias, le 48 depuis Ninus, durant 30 
ans. Aprfes lui les rois d'Assyrie, se succedant au pouvoir, de pfere en fils, ne 
firent rien de remarquable, et pas un seul d'entre eux ne r^gna moins de 20 


Allusions to Zoroaster in Chinese Literature 

Por my first direct information on this subject, a year ago, I am 
personally indebted to the Sinologist, Dr. F. Hirth, of Munich, 
■whose kindness I cordially appreciate, and whose suggestions I grate- 
fully acknowledge. Dr. Hirth recently wrote me that some of the 
material of which he spoke to me is easily accessible in the mono- 
graphs of Messieurs Chavannes and Dev^ria, from which I give 


selections, as they can but be of special interest to students of Zoro- 
astrianism. Dr. Frederick W. Williams, of Yale University, New 
Haven, furthermore draws my attention to the existence of a number 
of references in Chinese literature to the religion of Zoroaster as 
Po-s% king Man, ' religion of Persia,' or Po-sz. I am sincerely indebted 
to these gentlemen, and I hope that, joined perhaps by Mgr. C. 
de Harlez and others, they may pursue their researches farther in 
this particular line, and add to our knowledge of the Prophet of 
Ancient Iran, and his influence in the Far East. 

In a letter which Dr. Hirth wrote to me, he says : ' What I con- 
sider to be the Chinese transcription of the name Zoroaster occurs in 
a work called Si-M-tsung-yii (chap. 1, p. 20). Speaking of the 
deity, Mahesvara (in Chinese Ma-yi-scliou-lo), the author, who wrote 
about the middle of the twelfth century (of. Wylie, Notes on Chinese 
Literature, p. 128) says : " It [the deity] originally came from the 
great country of Persia, and is [there] called Su-lu-tsche. The god 
had a disciple by the name of Yiian-tchen, who studied the doctrine 
of his master, etc., in Persia, and afterwards travelled to China to 
spread it there." ' ■■■ 

M. ;fid. Chavannes, Le Nestorianisme et V Inscription de Kara- 
Balgassoun in Journ. Asiatique, Janv. Fev. 1897, p. 61 seq., gives 
some very interesting allusions to the Persian religion and its spread 
in China, onward from the seventh century of our era. I select 
two extracts which mention Zoroaster. The monograph itself should 
be consulted. 

Chavannes, op. cit. p. 61, notes, by way of introduction: 'A la 
date de la 6^ annee tcheng-koan (631),^ le Fo-tsou t'ong M dit (Chapter 
xxxix. p. 71 V°, 9° cahier de la lettre^ dans I'edition japonaise du 
Tripitaka de la Societe Asiatique) : — 

"Autrefois Sou-U-tche (ZarathusMra, Zoroastre), du royaume de Perse, 
avait institu^ la religion mo-ni-enne du dieu cfleste du feu ; un 6dit imp&ial 
ordonna d'^tablir ^ la capitale un temple de Ta-tsHn.''^ * 

' Dans le mgme ouvrage (chap. liv. p. 151 r°), on lit : — 

1 On seeing Dev^ria's citation of ^J.e. \.d. 631. 

the same passage (given above), Dr. ^ Here follows a Chinese char- 

Hirth supplements his note by adding acter. 

that it is perhaps the intention of the * I.e. Chaldea; see Dev^ria, op. cit. 

passage to indicate that the doctrine p. 456. Similarly De Rosny, Le CuUe de 

rather than YUan-tchen travelled to Zoroastre chez les Chinois in Congres 

China. See DevMa's quotation. int. des Orient. , 1""= Sess. ii. 323-326. 

280 APPENDIX 71 

"Pour ce qui est de la religion mo-rei-eiine du dieu celeste du feu,i autrefois, 
dans le royaume de Perse il y eut Zoroastre ; il mit en vigueur la religion du dieu 
celeste du feu ; ses disciples vinrent faire des conversions en Chine ; sous les 
T'ang, la 5= ann^e tcheng-koan (631), un de ses seotateurs, le mage Ho-lou 
vint au palais apporter la religion du dieu celeste ; un d^cret imperial ordonna 
d'^tablir k la capitale un temple de Ta-tsHn." ' 

M. G. Deveria, Musulmans et ManicMens Chinois in Journ. Asia- 
tique, Nov. Dec. 1897, p. 445 seq., especially discusses certain Chinese 
material on the subject of Manichseism ; he cites and translates 
(on p. 456) the last passage given by Chavannes, and notes also the 
one to -which Hirth had already called attention. 

Deveria, op. cit. p. 462 : 'Yao-Koan des Song dit : les caraotferes [. . .]^ 
d^signent I'Esprit Stranger du ciel ; [. . .] se prononce Men; son culte est 
celui que les livres saor^s bouddhiques appellent le culte de Mahesvara ; o'est 
dans la grande Perse qu'il prit naissanoe ; on I'y nomme (culte de) Zoroastre ; 
celui-oi eut un disciple appel6 Hiuan-tohen (Celeste v^rit^ ou V^ridique celeste), 
qui ^tudia la religion du maitre ; il descendait de Jouhouo-chau (Joukhshan ou 
Soukhshan ou Djoukhshan ?), grand gouverneur g^n^ral de la Perse ; sa propar 
gande s'exerja en Chine.' ^ 


References to some Syriac, Arabic, and other Mohammedan or 
Persian Allusions to Zoroaster 

The most convenient collection of material on Syriac and Arabic 
allusions to Zoroaster is by Gottheil in the book so often quoted 
above and easily accessible. I merely repeat the title below. To 
supplement this, see brief remark in AJSL. xiii. 225 and I note also 
(by pages) such references as I have observed in Hyde, Barbier de 
Meynard, Vullers, or elsewhere, as the works can be consulted. 

1. Gottheil, B.., References to Zoroaster in Syriac and Arabic Liter- 
ature, collected in Classical Studies in Honour of Henry Drisler, New 
York, 1894 (Columbia University Press), pp. 24-51. This monograph 
gives abundant bibliographical material. 

1 Deveria, op. cit. p. 456, renders ' de searches, Part I., pp. 15 seq., Shang- 
la religion de Mo-ni de I'Esprit celeste hai, 1880, on the Chinese knowledge 
du feu,' and notes that Mo-ni refers to of Bactria and Persia. Specialists can 
the Manichseans (p. 464). doubtless add much on this subject. 

2 Here are Chinese characters. Professor Bang reminds me of ZDMQ. 
8 Cf . also Fergusson, Chinese Be- xliv. 151 ; xlv. 627 ; WZKM. xii. 51. 


2. Hyde, T., Historia Beligionis velerum Persarum, Oxon. 1700, 
the following pages : — 

Shahrastani, p. 153 (fires), 294-296 (Magian doctrines and Z.), 298-300 (of. 

Gottheil, p. 46 seq.), 382 (Messianic propliecy by Z.). 
Ibn Shahna, p. 162 seq. (Z. and dualism). 
Shall Kholgl, p. 164 (Z. and the Gahanbar). 
Bar Bahltil (Syriac), p. 310 (etymology of Z.'s name ; Messianic prophecies ; 

cf. Gottheil, p. 28). 
Abiilf eda, p. 311 (Z. born at Urumiah). 
Beidawi, p. 313 (Z. and religion ; Z.'s mountain at Istakhr). 
Aba Mohammed Mustafa, p. 313 (Z. and Ezra ; doctrines). 
Bundari, p. 314 seq. (after Tabari). 
Majdi, pp. 315-317, 319, 385 (Z. Palestine and Adarbaijan ; conversion of V. ; 

molten brass ordeal ; cypress of Kishmar ; Jamasp) . 
Khvandamiri, p. 317 seq. (Z. and fire-worship ; V. at Istakhr). 
Shah Namah Nasr, pp. 319-325 (abridged prose account from ShN. of Z.'s 

conversion of V., and his history). 
Abul-Paraj, p. 384 (Messianic). 

Khalll Sufi, pp. 385, 421 (Jamasp = Daniel ; the Persian language). 
Sad-dar, p. 433 seq. (gives a Latin translation). 

Al-Makin, p. 529 (Z. contemporary with Smerdis; Z. institutes a communion). 
Eutychius, see Appendix II., p. 168 above. 

3. The Mujmal al-Tawm-lTch (a.d. 1126, author unknown). Ex- 
traits du Modjmal alrTewarikh, relatifs d, I'histoire de la Perse, traduits 
par Jules Mohl {Journal Asiatique, tome xi. pp. 136, 268, 320, Paris, 
1841). This work is later than Tabari, Hamzah, and Firdausl. The 
author makes use of Hamzah. The special pages which are of 
interest in connection with Zoroaster are the following : p. 147 
(chronology), 160 (Lohrasp), 161 (Gushtasp), 162-163 (Bahman, 
Humai, Darab, Dara, Sikander), 333 (the reign of Gushtasp, war 
with Arjasp). 

4. Barbier de Meynard Dictionnaire giographique, historique et 
littiraire de la Perse et des Gantries adjacentes, extrait du Mddjem 
elrBouldan de Yaqout, Paris, 1861. Zoroaster is especially men- 
tioned in the following articles, which should be consulted, and 
quotations have already been made from them : pp. 26, 86 Ourmiah, 
p. 33 Oustounawend, p. 367 8cMz, p. 614-515 Mali-Dinar (orig. Din- 

Important information further illustrating the subject may be 
found under the following heads in the same translation from 
Yakut (the list, however, not complete) : p. 27 JErwend, Elvend, 63 
Iran, 75 Badeghis, 80 Bamian, Bamin, 86 Bakhdjermian, 100, Bost 


(in Seistan), 106 BosM (mentions Vishtasp), 107 Boschtenfurousch (for 
Vishtasp), 112 Balkh (for Lohrasp), 124 Behistoun, 167 Djounbond, 
Gounbed (for Isfendiar), 183 Djeihoun (Jiliun, Oxus), 197 Khoraqan 
(anc. Pers. kings), 224, 236 Dehaxuend, Demawend, 251 Dinewer, 268 
Bouian, 272 Biwend, 273 Bey, Bai (but Z. is not mentioned), 280 
ZabouKstan (Rustam), 284 Zerd (mt.), 300 Sebelan (mt., but Z. is not 
mentioned), 300-305 Sedjestan, Seistan, 367 ScMz, 413 Farmed, 464 
Qowm^ (Kumish), 467 Qohendez (qu. At. Kanha Daeza ?), 469 Kaboid, 
471 Karian (Magian pyraea), 477 ^owrr (no mention of Vishtasp), 
489 KouscMasfi (mentions Vishtasp), 489 Keschmer (no mention of Z. 
or v.), 669 Noubelmr (temple at Balkh). 

5. Iskandar Namah. Sketch of the Codex of Iskandar ISTamah, 
Nizami, in Catalogo della Biblioteca Naniana, Assemani, vol. i. pp. 
112-122, esp. 119 seq. Division xv. (Lohrasp, contemporary of 
Jeremiah and Daniel; at his time lived Zardusht, but Abulfaraj 
makes him flourish under Cambyses ; Lohrasp reigned 120 years). 
Division xvi. Vishtasp and Zoroaster (doctrines of Zoroaster ; Vish- 
tasp reigned about 120 years ; in his time lived Socrates of Greece, 
and Jamasp the Persian Philosopher). Divisions xvii.-xx. (sketch 
of following reigns down to Iskandar). 

6. "Ulama-i Islam, a Persian work in prose. This treatise of the 
twelfth century a.d. deals rather with a vision of Zardusht and with 
eschatology. It is accessible in English and in German: Wilson, 
Parsi Beligion, pp. 560-563, I'lma-i-Islam translated; VuUers, Frag- 
mente ilber Zoroaster, pp. 43-67, Ulemai Islam tlbersetzt. See also 
comment by Wilson, Parsi Beligion, p. 135, and Anquetil du Perron, 
ZendrAvesta, ii. p. 339, West, in Orundriss der iran. Philol. ii. 123. 

7. Dasatir. This curious collection, with its commentary, pro- 
fesses to be old; but it is criticised adversely by Wilson, Parsi 
Beligion, pp. 411-412. It is quoted by the Dabistan. Some selec- 
tions, with commentary, from the chapter on Zardusht's philoso- 
phy are added here from the only edition with translation that is 
accessible. The spelling of the edition is preserved practically 
unchanged, but with a few corrections of accents. The title of the 
edition reads : The Desatir or Sacred Writings of the Ancient Persian 
Prophets; in the Original Tongue; together with the Ancient Persian 
Version of the Fifth Sasan ; carefully published by Mulla Bin Firuz 
Kaus. With English translation. 2 vols. Bombay, 1818. 

Dasatir, p. 120, § 42. 'Now a Wise Man, named Tianur,^ will 

1 Tfl.tianush, Pers. 


come from l^iir§,kh.^ in order to consult thee concerning tlie real 
nature of things.' 

§ 43. 'I ■will tell thee what he asketh, and do thou answer (his 
questions) before he putteth them.' 

Commentary. — ' It is said that when the fame of the excellence of the nature 
of Zertusht had spread all over the world, and when Isfendi^r went round the 
world, erected fire-temples, and raised domes over the flres ; the wise men of 
YunSn selected a sage named Tfltianush, who at that time had the superiority 
in acquirements over them all, to go to Ir§,n and to enquire of Zertusht concern- 
ing the real nature of things. If he was puzzled and unable to answer, he could 
be no real prophet ; but if he returned an answer, he was a speaker of truth. 
When the YunS,m Sage arrived at Balkh, GushtSsp appointed a proper day, on 
which the Mobeds of every country should assemble ; and a golden chair was 
placed for the YunSnt Sage. Then the beloved of Yezd9.n, the prophet Zertusht 
advanced into the midst of the assembly. The Yunanl Sage on seeing that 
chief said, " This form and this gait cannot lie, and nought but truth can proceed 
from them." He then asked the day of the prophet's nativity. The prophet of 
God told it. He said, " On such a day and under such a fortunate star a deceiver 
cannot be born." He next enquired into his diet and mode of life. The prophet 
of God explained the whole. The Sage said, " This mode of life cannot suit an 
impostor." The prophet of YezdSn then said to him : " I have answered you the 
questions which you have put to me ; now, retain in your mind what the famed 
YunSni Sages directed you to enquire of Zertusht and disclose it not ; but listen 
and hear what they ask ; for God hath informed me of it, and hath sent his word 
unto me to unfold it." The Sage said, " Speak." Thereupon the prophet Zertusht 
ordered the scholar to repeat the following texts : ' 

Dasat. p. 121, § 44. ' The friend of aeuteness will say unto thee, 
The NurSkh^ Sages ask, What use is there for a prophet in this 

[Here follow a numher of the supposed questions that will be 
asked, and then a prophecy is made of Vishtasp and an account 
given of how the Avesta came into the hands of Alexander the 

Dasat. p. 123, §§ 58-59. [The sacred book of the Iranians is 
referred to in the text and the commentary says, among other 
things] : 

Commentary. — ' That book is the inspired volume which the prophet of God, 
Zertusht, asked of God that he should send down as his book for the purpose 
of advice ; that when the time of Sekander should arrive, the Destfirs might 
exhibit it, and he being gratified with it, become more attached to the faith of 
the Pure. Yezdftn, approving of the request of his prophet, sent down a part of 

1 YunSn, Pers. ; that is, Greece. ^ YunSn, Pera. 


his word in the form of an Advice to Sekander ; and the King (i.e. Gusht§,sp) 
placed it, sealed with the seals of the Destiirs, in the Treasury. When 
Sekander gained the ascendency in Iran, Peridukht Koushenek and the Destiirs 
delivered that volume into his hands. He read it, applauded the religion of 
AbM (on which be blessings), praised the greatness of Zertusht and the truth 
of that Religion, and commanded the Mobeds that they should make that book 
a portion of the Des§,tlr. That sacred volume is known under the name of 
Sekander, as it is for his instruction that it was revealed to Zertusht ; and the 
beginning of it is, "In the name of the Giver of Knowledge Mezdam." ' 

Dasat. p. 125, § 64. '0 prophet and friend! Hertush son of 
HeresfetmS,d ! When Senkerakas ^ arrived, he was turned into the 
right road by one fershem of the Navissha,^ and returned back into 
Azend.' * 

Commentary. — ' Chengereng§,oheh was a sage renowned for his acuteness 
and wisdom, and the Mobeds (wise-men)of the earth gloried in being his scholars. 
When he heard of the greatness of the prophet of Yezdan, Zertusht the son of 
Isf entemto, he came to Iran with the intention of overturning the Good Religion. 
When he reached Balkh, before he had dropped a single word from his tongue, 
and before he had asked a single question, the prophet of Yezd^n, Zertusht, said 
into him, " Commit not to your tongue what you have in your heart, but keep it 
secret." He then addressed a Sage who was his disciple, saying, " Read to him 
one section (Nisk) of the Awesta." In this blessed section of the Awesta were 
found the questions of ChengerengSoheh with the answers, which He (God') 
himself had communicated to the prophet ; forewarning him, that such a person, 
of such a name would come ; that his first question would be this, and that the 
answer was to be so. When Chengereng^oheh saw this miracle, he was con- 
verted to the Good Taith, and returning to the land of Hind remained steady 
in this blessed religion. May Yezdan the Bountiful grant to us and our friends 
this best of Paiths ! ' 

Dasat. p. 126, § 65. 'Kow a Brahman named Birts* will come 
from Azend very wise, insomuch that there are few such persons on 
earth ! ' 

§ 66. 'He, in his heart, intendeth to ask of thee, first. Why is not 
Mezd^m the immediate maker of all things having being ? ' 

§ 67. ' Say thou unto him ; Mezdam is the Maker of all things ; 
and used the medium of no instrument in bestowing existence on 
the Chief of Angels ; but in regard to all other existence he made 
use of an instrument.' 

1 ChengerengScheh, Pers. » Hind, Pers. 

^ By one Nisk (i.e. Nask or section) * Bias, Pers. Undoubtedly the cele- 

of the Awesta, Pers. brated ViSs or VySsa. 


Commentary. — ' The First Intelligence received being from the Bestower of 
Being without the intervention of any instrument ; while all other beings received 
existence by the intervention of instruments and media.' 

[Here a long series of questions and answers are given to Zoroaster 
so as to prepare him. The text then continues as follows.] 

Page 143, § 162. ' When you have expounded this matter to him, 
he will become of the true faith, and be converted to your religion.' 

Commentary. — 'It is said that when BiSs, the Hindi, came to Balkh, Gush- 
ttop sent for Zertusht, and informed the prophet of YezdS,n of that wise man's 
coming. The prophet said, "May YezdSn turn it to good ! " The Emperor then 
commanded that the Sages and Mobeds should be summoned from all countries. 
When they were all assembled, Zertusht came from his place of "Worship ; and 
BiS,s, also having joined the assembly, said to the prophet of Yezd^n ; " Zer- 
tusht, the inhabitants of the world, moved by the answers and expounding of 
Secrets given to ChengerengScheh, are desirous to adopt thy religion. I have 
heard, moreover, of many of thy miracles. . I am a Hindi man, and, in my own 
country, of unequalled Icnowledge. I have in my mind several secrets, which I 
have never entrusted to my tongue, because some say that the Ahermans (devils) 
might give information of them to the idolaters of the Aherman faith : so no 
ear hath heard them, except that of my heart. If, in the presence of this assem- 
bly, you tell me, one after another, what those secrets are that remain on my 
mind, I will be converted to your faith. Shet Zertusht said, BISs, Yezd§,n 
communicated to me your secrets, before your arrival. He then mentioned the 
whole in detail from beginning to end. When Bi3,s heard, and asked the mean- 
ing of the words, and had them explained ^ to him, he returned thanks to Yezd§,n 
and united himself to the Behdin, after which he returned back to Hind.' 

§ 163. ' In the name of Mezdam ! Zertusht ! my prophet ! 
After thee shall Simkendesh ^ appear, and afterwards the First S§,sSn, 
the prophet, shall come and make thy Book known by a translation.' 

§ 164. ' And no one but he shall know the meaning of my words.' 

Commentary. — ' Hence it was that Shet SS.s§,n made an interpretation of the 
Book of Shet Zertusht agreeably to its sense.' 

8. Dabistan (Persian) gives an account of the Persian religion, 
and of Zoroaster, and it has often been quoted above. This is 
accessible in Shea and Troyer's translation : The Dabistan or School 
of Manners, translated from the original Persian, by D. Shea and 
A. Troyer, Paris, 1843, vol. i. pp. 211-253. 

9. Sources like the Shah Namah, Zartusht Namah, Cangranghacah 

1 Since they were spoken in a Persian language which he did not understand. 

2 Sekander. 


Namah and Mirkhond, have been sufficiently discussed above. For 
titles and editions of other Persian works on Zoroastrianism, refer- 
ence may be made to West's Appendix, The Modern-Persian Zoroas- 
trian Literature of the Pai'sis in the Orundriss der iran. Philol. ii. 

Allusion to Zoroaster in the Snorra Edda Preface 

[Reprinted, with unimportant omissions, from my Notes on Zoroaster and 
the Avesta, in Proceedings AOS., March, 1894, vol. xvi. pp. cxxvi.-viii.] 

In the preface to the Younger Edda there is a passage relating to 
Zoroaster which is perhaps worth recording among the allusions to 
his name found in non-Oriental literature. The preface to the Snorra 
Edda, after giving a brief sketch of the history of the world down 
to the time of ISToah and the Flood, proceeds to an account of the 
Tower of Babel and the dispersion of the races through the confu- 
sion of tongues. Foremost among the builders of the tower was 
Zoroaster ; the text adds that he became king of the Assyrians, and 
that he was the first idolater. In consequence of the confusion of 
tongues he was known by many names, but chief among these was 
Baal or Bel. 

The text Edda Snorra Sturlusonar, formdli 2, ed. Jdnsson, p. 5, is here given 
for convenience of future reference : Ok sd, erfremstrvar, het Zoroastres ; hann 
Mo, fyrr enn hann gret, er hann kom i veroldina ; enn forsmithir voru II ok 
LXX, ok svd margar tungur hafa sithan dreifst um verolditia, eptir thvi sem 
risarnir skiptust sithan til landa, ok thjothirnar fjolguthust. I thesum sama 
stath var gjor ein hin dgcetasta borg ok dregit af nafni stopulsins, ok kollut 
Bab'don. Ok sem tungnaskiptit var orthit, thd fjolguthust svd nofnin man- 
nanna ok annara hluta, ok sjd sami Zoroastres hafthi morg nofn; ok tho at 
hann undirstcethi, at hans ofsi vceri Imgthr of sagthri smith, thd fxrthi hann sik 
tho fram til veraldligs metnathar, ok let taka sik til konungs yjir morgum 
thjothum Assiriorum. Af honum hofst skurthgotha villa; ok sem hann var 
blotathr, var hann kallathr Baal ; thann kollum ver Bel; hann hafthi ok morg 
onnur nofn. Enn sem nofnin fjolguthust, thd tyndist meth thi sannleikrinn. 

5 (p. 7). Ok af thessu hofst onnur villa milium Kritarmanna ok Mace- 
doniorum, svd sem hinfyrri methal Assiriorum ok Kaldeis af Zoroastre. 

This may he rendered : ' He who was the foremost (builder of the tower) 
was called Zoroaster ; he laughed before he cried when he came into the world. 
But there were (in all) seventy-two master-builders ; and so many tongues have 
since spread throughout the world, according as the giants afterwards were 
scattered over the land and the nations multiplied. In this same place was 


built a most renowned town, and it derived its name from the tower, and was 
called Babylon. And when the confusion of tongues had come to pass, then 
multiplied also the names of men and of other things ; and this same Zoroaster 
had many names. And although he well understood that his pride was humbled 
by the said work, nevertheless he pushed his way on to worldly distinction, and 
got himself chosen king over many peoples of the Assyrians. Prom him arose 
the error of graven images (i.e. idolatry) ; and when he was sacrificed unto, he 
was called Baal ; we call him Bel ; he had also many other names. But, as the 
names multiplied, so was the truth lost withal.' 

5. '(From Saturn) there arose another heresy among the Cretans and Mace- 
donians, just as the above mentioned error among the Assyrians and Chaldseans 
arose from Zoroaster.' 

This passage is interesting for several reasons. 

First, it preserves the tradition elsewhere recorded regarding Zoro- 
aster's having laughed instead of having cried when he was born 
into the world. [This has already been discussed above, p. 27.] 

Second, the two allusions here connecting Zoroaster with Assyria, 
ChaldaBa, and Babylon are to be added to those references which 
associate his name also with these places (e.g. consult Windischmann, 
Zor. Studien, p. 303 seq.) ; or again they are to be placed beside the 
statement of the Armenian Moses of Khorene, Thomas Arzrouni 
and others who make Zoroaster a contemporary of Semiramis, and 
appointed by her to be ruler of Nineveh and Assyria. (See Spiegel, 
Eranische AlterthumsJcunde, 1. 682 [and the quotation of the passage 
in this Appendix].) 

Third, in connection with the reputed multiplicity of names of 
Zoroaster, and the association of his name with Baal, Bel, attention 
might be called to the citation in the Syro-Arabic Lexicon of Bar 
'All (c. A.D. 832) s.v. Balaam, ' Balaam is Zardosht, the diviner of 
the Magians' (cf. Gottheil, Beferences, in the Drisler Classical 



There is a supposition that we are not wholly without some 
representation of the personal appearance of Zoroaster, at least 
according to the conception which prevailed in Sassanian times. 
One sculptured image, in particular, has been supposed to represent 
in an ideal of the great Master. It is also stated that there is 
a picture of Zoroaster in a fire-temple at Yezd, which is said to be 
taken from an old sculpture that exists at Balkh. This tradition, 
together with other facts and material on the subject of por- 
traiture of Zoroaster, is given in the following pages. The modern 
Zoroastrians themselves can doubtless add much more valuable infor- 
mation on this interesting subject. It is hoped that they will do so. 

(a) In the first place we may refer to a very old tradition on the 
subject of an e£ of Zoroaster ; this is found in the Syriac work 
called the 'Oration of Meliton the Philosopher; who was in the 
presence of Antoninus Csesar, and bade the same Csesar know God,' 
etc. This interesting allusion is quoted by Gottheil, References to 
Zoroaster (p. 27), from the translation of Cureton, Spicilegium Syria- 
cum, London, 1855, p. 44, cf. p. 91, n. 36 ; it mentions an ' image of 
Orpheus, a Thracian Magus ; and Hadran is the image of Zaradusht, 
a Persian Magus.' The special point of importance is that it shows 
the existence of a tradition as to a representation of Zoroaster. 

(b) E. G. Browne, in his valuable work, A Year amongst the Per- 
sians, London, 1893, p. 374, describes a visit which he paid to three 
Zoroastrian fire-temples at Yezd. The third temple which he men- 
tions, serves as a theological college for training youths for the priest- 
hood, and it contains a relic of interest. On the walls of one of the 
rooms of this building. Dr. Browne saw a picture which attracted his 
notice, or to use the words of his own description (p. 374) : ' A pict- 
ure of Zoroaster (taken, as Ardashir [the host and guide] told me, 
from an old sculpture at Balkh), and several inscriptions on the walls 



of the large central room, were the only other points of interest 
presented by the building.' It would be highly interesting if we 
could secure a copy of this portrait or of its reputed original at 
Balkh, because this would best represent the modern Zoroastrian tra- 
ditional idea of the appearance of the great High Priest. Possibly 
we may obtain it. The mention of Balkh, moreover, is interesting if 
this be a different representation from the supposed effigy at Takht-i 
Bostan. Should this be the case, and the location of the sculptured 
figure be found to be at the old temple Nubahar, we should have a 
new proof of the traditional association of Zoroaster's name with 

(c) The modern Parsi historian Dosabhai Pramji Karaka, whose 
work, History of the Parsis, London, 1884, is indispensable to stu- 
dents of Zoroastrianism in our day, presents in his second volume 
(ii. 146) an idealized colored portrait of the founder of the Faith, 
which is here reproduced (see Figure I.), without the coloring, how- 
ever. The portrait is evidently based upon the sculptures next to 
be described, and it has the value of giving the Parsi conception 

(d) The Takht-i Bostan Sculpture. Not far distant from Behis- 
tan, and near the city of Kermanshah (see Map, — square Be), in the 
valley of Takht-i Bostan or Tek-i Bostan, on a hillside, is to be 
found a series of six historic bas-reliefs. The sixth or last of these 
bas-reliefs comprises a group of four sculptured figures, reproduc- 
tions of which are presented below, being based upon the copies 
found in Sir Robert Ker Porter, Travels in Georgia, Persia, Armenia, 
etc., London, 1822, vol. ii. 191 ; Plandin et Coste, Voyage en Perse, i. 
Planche 14, texte p. 6; George Rawlinson, The Seventh Oriental 
Monarchy, London, 1876, p. 64 ; K. D. Kiash, Ancient Persian 
Sculptures, Bombay, 1889, p. 211 ; and especially the photographic 
copy of de Morgan, Mission Scientijique en Perse, Paris, 1894, vol. ii. 
plate xxxiv. p. 104^5 ; vol. iv. plate xxxv. p. 310-11. The photo- 
graph of the sculpture taken by M. de Morgan is so interesting that 
it seems appropriate to make it accessible to those who cannot con- 
sitlt the valuable original work. A brief description of the possible 
subject of this four-fold group, which, unfortunately, bears no 
inscription, is not out of place here. 

Sir R. K. Porter (p. 191) records that this rock-sculptured group 
is called by the natives 'The Pour Calendars,' but he does not 
explain why the name is given (see Figures II. and III.). He regards 


the figure on tlie extreme left (or to the right as we face the picture) 
as the god Ormazd presenting the ring or emblem of sovereignty to 
Ardashir Babagan, who stands in the centre of the group, ' and both 
are trampling upon a similar royally-habited figure symbolical of 
the fallen Arsacid^.' Of the fourth or remaining figure, the one in 
which we are particularly interested, Sir Ker Porter says (p. 192) : 
' The personage to the right of the centre figure [or to the left as 
we face the group] is of rather a singular appearance. His head 
is protected by a similar kind of cap, but without the ball, and with 
the extraordinary addition of a circle of rays blazing round his head 
and down to below his shoulders. He holds in both hands a fluted 
staff, or sceptre, of great length. The rest of his vesture nearly 
resembles that of the murally crowned figure. He stands upon a 
plant, not unlike a sunflower, the stalk of which is short and thick, 
and curved down into a lower part of the rock. The prostrate 
person is greatly mutilated ; but his pearl-wreath, collar, and sword 
show that his consequence was not inferior to the two who trample 
on him. . . . The radiated personage [the one under discussion] 
may either be a personification of the Mithratic religion restored 
by him [i.e. by Ardashir, the central figure] ; which the sunbeams 
round the head and the full-blown flower rising under their in- 
fluence at his feet, seem to typify ; or the figure may be meant for 
the glorified Zoroaster himself ; some Persian writers ascribing to 
him the reflected honor of that god-like attribute. The altar-plat- 
form near this bas-relief, and also the source of the river (two 
sacred Mithratic appendages), support the idea that this sculpture 
contains more than human images.' 

Sir John Malcolm, History of Persia, new edition, London, 1829, 
vol. i. p. 545 (cf. earlier edition i. 258), speaks of the two flgures 
with the circle or ring as 'two sovereigns upon a prostrate Eoman 
soldier ; ' and he adds : ' A figure supposed to be the prophet Zoro- 
aster stands by their side ; his feet rest upon a star, and his head is 
covered with a glory or crown of rays.' And he adds in a foot-note : 
' I am informed by the Parsees, or Guebres, that in almost all the 
paintings or sculptures that represent Zoroaster he is always distin- 
guished by a crown of rays, or glory, as I have described.' This 
shows, at least, the prevalence of a tradition that representations of 
Zoroaster were thought to be not uncommon, whatever we may 
think on the subject. Plandin also believed the radiated figure to 
be Zoroaster (Voyage en Perse de MM. Flandin et Coste, i. 442, 
Relation de Voyage, Paris, 1851). 

Figure II 
A Sculpture at Takht-i Bostan 


Edward Thomas, Sassanian Inscriptions, in the Journ. of the Royal 
Asiatic Society of Gt. Brit, and Ireland, new series, vol. iii. p. 267, 
n. 3, London, 1868 {= Early Sassanian Inscriptions, Seals and Coins, 
p. 27, London, Triibner, 1868), argues that the figure with the rays 
and staff represents the god Ormazd, and he bases his identification 
upon an acknowledged representation of Ormazd in a ISTaksh-i 
Eustam bas-relief (op. cit. p. 269).^ As for the rays, he adds in a 
note that a similar form is given to Ormazd's headgear in a coin of 
Hormisdas II. The other two figures in our group he regards, as 
do others, to be the representation of Ardashir presenting the crown 
of Iran to his son Shapur.^ 

Canon George Eawlinson (op. cit. p. 64) agrees with Thomas that 
the radiated figure is Ormazd, not Zoroaster ; that the other two are 
Ardashir and Shapur, and that the prostrate figure represents ' either 
Artabanus or the extinct Parthian monarchy, probably the former ; 
while the sunflower upon which Ormazd stands, together with the 
rays that stream from his head, denote an intention to present him 
under a Mithraic aspect, suggestive to the beholder of a real latent 
identity between the two great objects of Persian worship.' Pro- 
fessor Eawlinson, therefore, like Thomas, is not of the same opinion 
as those who presume that the figure represents Zoroaster. Simi- 
larly also, M. Dieulafoy, Suse, iv. 409, and Curzon, Persia, i. 563. 

The Parsi scholar, Kawasjee Dinshah Kiash, who visited Takht-i 
Bostan in 1878 and sketched the group, gives, in his serviceable 
book (The Ancient Persian Sculptures, p. 212), an interesting tradition 
regarding this bas-relief which seems not to be recorded by other 
writers on the subject. But first we may notice the details that he 
gives concerning the special figure, which, like the other ef&gies, 
stands about seven feet in height. 'The head of the first figure 
[the one we are discussing] is covered up with a piece of cloth, and 
a serpach flows down the back. He is clad in a short, plain coat, 
and wears a belt. He holds in both hands a club three feet long 
and three inches thick. The rays of the sun shine direct upon his 
head, and a star glitters beneath him.' Kiash next notes that some 
scholars call this a 'sunflower' rather than a star, and he further 
describes the other three figures of the group. Then follows the 
interesting tradition : — 

1 Some notes on sculptured images ^ On the subject of Ardashir and 

of Ormazd will appear in my article his history, see Darab D. P. Sanjana, 

on Ormazd in The Monist, Chicago, Karnanie l Artakhshlr i Fapakdn, new 

Dec, 1898. ed., Bombay, 1896. 

292 APPENDIX 711 

' Owing to the deficiency in the inscription, tradition says : " The first figure 
with the club is that of Prophet Zoroaster, the second is that of Gustasp, the 
fifth king of the Kayanian dynasty, the tliird is that of his son, the mighty 
Asphandiar [Isfendlar], who had established the Zoroastrian religion through 
the whole of Persia, and the last is that of Aijasp, the grandson of Afrasiab 
of Tooran, or Tartary. The circlet shows that the whole world is in their 
possession." ' 

He then adds : ' The above tradition, I believe, is taken from the 
Shah Nameh. The Persians take great pride in speaking of their 
by-gone kings. Ancient and modern writers contradict these state- 
ments, and doubtless the figures were not sculptured by the Kayanian 
kings, but by Ardeshir Babighan, the first ruler of the last dynasty 
of the Zoroastrians.' Mr. Kiash goes on to say he agrees with the 
view that the sculpture is of Sassanian origin, that the second and 
third figures apparently represent Ardashir and ShapUr I., and the 
dead figure is emblematical of the downfall of the Parthian dynasty. 
As to the first only is he in doubt, ' as it is of peculiar construction 
and difiiers from others I have seen in different parts of Persia. 
On comparing it with the two figures holding clubs at Nacksh-i- 
Eajab (op. cit. p. 112) and Nacksh-i-Roostum (p. 121), both the 
dress and crown differ. I am unable to give the name of any reli- 
gious personage or celestial being, but simply state that it must be 
a sign of the Mithraic religion. According to the opinion of my 
co-travellers, it is believed to be a form of the Prophet Zoroaster.' 

Whatever may be the origin and worth of the ' tradition ' which 
Mr. Kiash quotes as connecting the figures with Vishtaspa and his 
contemporaries, it certainly is very interesting in connection with 
Chapter X. and the characters who act in the drama of the Holy 
War, especially Arjasp, the foeman of the Faith, with whom we 
have become sufficiently acquainted. The statement which the 
Parsi writer records of the opinion of his co-travellers to the effect 
that the figure is that of the Prophet Zoroaster, shows, like kindred 
statements, a preponderance of traditional authority on the side of 
the Zoroastrians, at least, in identifying this figure with their 
Prophet. Everything of that kind has its weight and importance 
when we enter upon the question of such identifications or endeavor 
to interpret sculptured remains. 

The evidence on the subject of this particular sculpture, as we 
look it over, seems to be about evenly balanced. Tradition appar- 
ently favors the identification of the efiigy with Zoroaster; the 


more technical scholarly opinion of recent times, on the other hand, 
seems rather to regard the figure as a representation of Ormazd. 
The claim to Mithraic characteristics is not so easy to recognize. 
This much may be said in favor of tradition, that the figure would 
answer well to the glorified image, with ' dazzling wand ' and ' lus- 
trous glory ' around the head, which is the guise under which the 
Zoroastrian writer of the Zartusht Namah, in the thirteenth cen- 
tury, describes the vision of the Prophet's appearance (see Wilson, 
Par si Religion, p. 481). It is to be regretted that M. de Morgan (iv. 
310 ; observe his note) does not especially discuss the figure. For 
the sake of sentiment we should, perhaps, best like to imagine that 
the whole group really represents a Sassanian conception of a scene 
from the Holy War of Zoroastrianism, in which the great High 
Priest figured so prominently, and to which Kiash alludes in his 
' tradition ' ; but, after all, we should have to acknowledge that this 
is due, perhaps, to our sentiment and fancy.-"^ 

The whole subject of the portraiture of Zoroaster requires further 
investigation.^ Much will doubtless be added on this question from 
time to time.^ Let tis hope especially that additional information 

1 Murray's Handbook of Asia Minor, 
Transcaucasia, Persia, etc., London, 
1895, p. 327, merely gives tlie common 
statement that this is a, ' Sassanian 
panel, which is supposed to represent 
the investiture of Shapiir I. with part of 
the kingdom, hy his father, Ardeshir.' 

2 A figure has been published as a 
portrait of Zoroaster in Dr. "Wallace 
Wood's Hundred Greatest Men, p. 125, 
London, 1885, but I have not been 
able to find authority for attributing 
the likeness to Zoroaster. It repre- 
sents the head of a grave-faced priest 
and counsellor, with the familiar mitre- 
shaped pontifical head-covering of Sas- 
sanian times. On p. 496 of the volume, 
a note is added that the figure is copied 
from a bas-relief at Persepolis. Men- 
tion is made of Thomas, Early Sas- 
sanian Inscriptions. The portrait is 
reproduced as a frontispiece to an ar- 
ticle on Mazdaism in the Open Court, 
xi. 129, Chicago, 1897. In a follow- 

ing number of The Open Court, xi. 
378, a Parsi, N. F. Bilimoria, writes 
that the portrait was new to him and 
to his co-religionists. As an ideal it 
is good ; but it seems to lack traditional 
authority. I may learn more about it. 
2 At the moment when I am send- 
ing the final proof-sheets to the press, 
there arrives from my friend Professor 
Charles R. Lanman, of Harvard Uni- 
versity, a prospectus of an important 
work just issued by Mr. Quaritch of 
London, and the Harvard Library 
kindly forwards to me the magnificent 
facsimile. It is entitled A Florentine 
Picture- Chronicle by Maso Finiguerra, 
and it is a reproduction of a fifteenth 
century folio of Italian drawings now 
in the British Museum. Among these 
drawings are '14. Zoroaster,' '49. Oro- 
masdes raising the Dead,' and ' 50. Hos- 
tanes.' The 'Zoroaster' is a typical 
magician with books of black art and 
imps rather than an antique sage. 


or suggestion on this special theme may be obtained particularly 
from the Zoroastrians themselves. Any material that can be found 
to throw more light on the problem will be welcomed. The subject 
is one that is worthy of earnest consideration because it stands, in a 
certain manner, for an ideal. I shall be glad if these notes have 
contributed anything by drawing attention to this interesting theme 
for research. And with these words I close the book, adding only 
a line which the Pahlavi scribes of old liked to add in the colophon : 

Frajaft pavan drut va satih va rdmisn. 




[The numbers refer to the pages] 

Abbasabad, 216. 

Abdias, text quoted, 257-259. 

Abode of Visbtaspa, 58. 

Abulfaraj, 167. 

Abulfeda, 201. 

Aohaemenians, 134, 160, 172, 219. 

Adarbaijan, 17, 38, 39, 40, 48, 49, 96, 

168, 171, 192, 193-201 (especially as 

Z.'s birthplace), 220-221. See also 

Atropatene, Atur-patakan, and Air- 

yana Vaejah. 
Adharjushnas, 198. 
JEneas of Gaza, text quoted, 248. 
Aevatak river, 40, 41. 
Af er, text quoted, 245. 
Aganaces or Azonaces, teacher of Z., 

Agathias, 6 n. 6 ; 12 ; text quoted, 248. 
Age of Zoroaster, 15 and Appendix II. 
Aharubo-stoto, 137. 
Ahmad al-Baladhuri, quoted, 198. 
Ahriman, flees at Z.'s birth, 27. See 

also Anra Mainyu. 
ahumblS, 79 n. 2. 
Ahuna Vairya, 51. 
Ahura Mazda selects Z. as prophet, 27. 

See also 97, 171. 
Airyana Vaejah, 193, 196. See also 

Airan Vej. See Airyana Vaejah and 

Airyama Isbya, 97 n. 1. 
Akhtya, Akht, 44 n. 2; 84, 137, 181. 

Alak, home of the Spltamas, 24, 192. 

Albiruni, 7, 141, 161, 174. 

Alborz Mts. , scene of a conference, 47. 

Alcuin, text quoted, 252. 

Alexander the Great, 134, 138, 139, 

158, 161, 162, 163, 181. 
Alexander Polyhistor, text quoted, 

Allusions to Z. in Arabic, etc., 280- 

286 ; in Snorra Edda, 286-287. 
"AjuapSos, 211. 

Ameretat confers with Z., 49. 
Ammianus Marcellinus, 167, 188, 207, 

213 ; text quoted, 244. 
Amshaspands, 41, 42; conferences with 

Z., 207. 
Amurdat. See Ameretat. 
Anathemas, quoted, 253. 
Ancestry of Z., 17 seq. 
Ancestral tree of Z., 19, 20. 
Ancient Persian Inscriptions, Z. not 

mentioned in, 5. 
Andarlman, 109, 110. 
Anosh-adhar, 113. 
Anquetil du Perron, quoted, 85 and 

n. 3; 148; on Z.'s date, 175. 
Anra Mainyu, 51. 
Apocryphal literature, 4. 
Apocryphal New Testament, 97. 
Apostles of Z., 136 seq. 
Apuleius, 6 n. 6 ; 7 n. 5, n. 6 ; quoted, 

169 ; text quoted, 237. 
Apuscorus, 138. 
Arabic allusions to Z.'s date, 16, 161 

seq. ; to Z. in general, 281. 




Arabic form Armiah, 197. 

Arabic sources of information as to 
Z., 6 et passim, 281. 

Arag, 192. 

Arak, home of the Spitamas, 24, 192. 

Aras, Araxes, 194 n. 2. 

Arastai, 54. 

Arasti, 20. 

Araxes, 221. 

Archangels come to Z., 41, 42, 65 seq., 

Archetype copy of Avesta, 76, 97, 
117, 224. 

Ardashir, son of Vishtasp, 112, 115. 

Ardashir Dirazdast, 133, 173, 159, 

Arejat-aspa and Holy Wars, 103-105 ; 
leader of Hyaonians, 104 ; ultimatum 
to Vishtaspa, 107 ; invades Iran, 108 ; 
situation of his kingdom, 213 ; his 
two invasions of Iran, 214, 221-222. 
See also Arjasp. 

Aristotle, 8, 152 ; cited under Pliny 
and Diog. Laertius, 234, 241. 

Aristoxenus, cited under Origen, 240. 

Arjasp, 66 ; his warlike message, 108 ; 
second invasion of Iran, 118 seq. ; 
date of defeat, 181 ; scene of hat- 
ties against Vishtasp, 218 ; possible 
sculptured representation of Arjasp, 
292. See also Arejat-aspa. 

Armaiti, 83. 

Armenian references to Z. , 6. 

Armenian form of Z.'s name, 13. 

Armenian allusions to Z., translations, 

Armiah (tJrmiah), 30, 197. 

Armiah. See also Jeremiah. 

Army of Arjasp, 109 seq. ; of Vishtasp, 
109 seq. 

Arnij-bareda, 20 n. 3. 

Arnobius, 156, 187 ; text quoted, 242. 

Artashir, religious monarch, 82, 133. 

Artavahishto, 128, 136. 

Arta Viraf, quoted, 157. 

Artaxerxes Longimanus, 134, 160. 

Arum. See Riim, 117. 

Arzrouni, Thomas, allusions to Z. 
quoted, 217, 276-278. 

Asbanbur, town, 59 n. 2. 

Asooli, quoted, 149. 

Ashak, 22. 

Ashavahisht, 24. See also Asha Va- 

Asha Vahishta confers with Z. , 47. 

Ashavahishto, 67. See also Asha 
Vahishta, Artavahishto. 

Ashta-aurvant, 103. 

Asia Minor, 84, 88. 

Asmo-hvanvat, 137. 

Asmok-khanvato, 137, 181. 

Asnavad Mt., 48, 100, 207. 

Asoka, 37. 

aspa, in names, 14 n. 1. 

aspdnvar, 59 n. 2 ; 209. 

Assassins, 222. 

Astrampsyohus, 138. 

Atash-gahs, 98, 101. 

Athenocles, text quoted. See Aga- 
thias, 249. 

Atropatene, 16, 22, 141, 177, 196, 211. 
See also Adarbaijan. 

Atar Bilrzhin Mitro, 100. 

Atrlr Tarnbag, 99. 

Atilr Gilshnasp, 100. 

Atur-patakan, 192, 204. See also 
Adarbaijan, Airyana Vaejah. 

Augustine, 188 ; text quoted, 246. 

Aiiharmazd. See Ahura Mazda. 

Auramazda, 171, 172. 

Aurvaita-dang, 39 n. 1 ; 43, 207. 

Aiirvaito-dih, the Tiir, 33. 

Aurvasara, 215 and n. 3. 

Aurvat-aspa, or Lohrasp, 78, 180 ; 
destroys Jerusalem, 91 n. 2 ; asso- 
ciated with Nebuchadnezzar, 162, 

Avaraoshtri, 22. 

Avesta and Zand, 7. 

Avesta, source of information, 5; arche- 
type copy written down by Jamasp, 
76, 97, 117, 224 ; as a sacred book, 

Ayuso, referred to, 149. 



Azhi Dahaka, 11 n. 1 ; 62 n. 2. 
Azonaces or Aganaces, 30. 


Baal, 157. 

Babylon and Jewish exile, 11 ; seat of 
tyranny, 11 n. 1. See also 90-92. 

Babylonian exile or captivity, 142, 176. 

Bactria, 73, 141, 155, 160, 171, 177, 
184, 196 n. 1 ; as scene of Z.'s min- 
istry, 186-188, 208-218. See also 
220 seq. Compare likewise Balkh. 

Bactrian camel, 14 n. 1. 

Bactrian kingdom, 11. 

Bahman. See Vohiiman, son of Spend- 

Bahman Yasht, quoted, 214. 

Balaam, name associated with Z., 
15 n. 3 ; 157, 287. 

Balkh, 38, 86, 89, 130, 141, 199-201, 
283 ; Vishtaspa's conversion at, 60 ; 
Vishtaspa at, 107 ; portrait of Z. re- 
puted to be at, 209, 289 seq. Com- 
pare likewise 116, 118, 119. See 
furthermore, 213, 214. 

Bapel, 91. See also Babylon. 

Baruch, 197 ; identified with Z., 80. 

Bar, 215. 

Bar 'Ebhraya, quoted, 201. 

Bartholomae, cited, 14 n. 2. 

Bashutan. See Peshotanu. 

Basil, text quoted, 244. 

Bastavairi, a hero in first Holy War, 
105, 112, 118, 116, 121, 122. 

Bastvar. See Bastavairi. 

Battles, of first Holy War, 114 seq. ; 
of second Holy War, 120 seq. ; be- 
tween Vishtaspa and Arejat-aspa, 
214, 218. 

Beh-Afrld, 72. 

Beidawi, cited, 220. 

Bendva, anathematized, 44. 

Berosos, cited by Agathias, 249. 

bharadvdja, 14. 

Bia-Pis, 211. 

Bias, Hindu sage (Vyasa), 88, 284-285. 

Bidrafsh, 109, 110, 111, 116. 

Binalud Kuh, 216. 

BIras, Bias, 284-285. 

Birjand, 215. 

Birth of Z., 26. 

Birthplace of Z., 16 seq. and App. II. 

Bishtasp. See Vishtaspa. 

Black horse, healed, 62. 

Blind man, healed, 94. 

Brahman Cangranghacah, 85. 

Brahmanical cord, 32 n. 2. 

Bratar-vakhsh. See Bratrok-resh. 

Bratrok-rgsh, Bratar-vakhsh, 28, 127- 

129 ; plots against Z., 81. 
Brisson, cited, 147. 
Brodbeck, referred to, 149. 
Browne, E. G., 288-289. 
Buddha, 1-2, 17, 18, 51, 140, 176, 177. 
Buddhism, 135. 
Buiti, 51. 
Btindahishn, quoted, 18-21, 123, 158, 

193, 216. 
Burnouf, cited, 148. 
Burzin-kuriis, Z.'s teacher, 30. 
Burzhin Mitro fire, 100, 216. 
Bust, 137. 

Cabul, 99, 217. See also Kabul. 

Caecista, 195, 197, 204. See Urumiah. 

Cakhshni or Cikhshnush, 18, 19, 

Cambyses, 167. 

Camel, in proper names, 14. 

Cangranghacah, 85-88, 209, 284. 

Cangranghacah Namah, 85-88, 209. 

oaTsra'ohdc, 87. 

Casartelli, quoted, 149; on Z.'s date, 

Caspian Sea, 207, 219, 220, 223 ; Z. in 

that region, 46 ; scene of Arejat- 

aspa's sacrifice, 211. See also Vou- 

Cassel, P., quoted, 149. 
Cassianus Bassus, text quoted, 249. 
Cave, in Z.'s religion, 34, 190, 194 n. 1. 
Cedrenus, 126. See Georgius Cedre- 

nus, 251. 



Cephalion, cited, 12, 187 ; referred to 
by Georg. Syncell., 252. 

Chaldssan oracles, 259-273. 

Chares of Mitylene, 73, 220. 

Chariot, symbol of the religion, 135. 

Chavannes, M. ifed. , oa a Chinese allu- 
sion to Z., 279-280. 

Children of Z., 21. 

China, Z. in, 39. 

Chinese form of Z.'s name, 280. 

Chinese references to Z. in general, 6 
n. 2 ; given in translation, 278-280. 

Chinese reference for dating Z. , 165. 

ChionitK, 213, 220-221. See also 

Christianity and Zoroastrianism, 1. 

Christ's coming foretold, 98, 201. 

Chronicon Alexandrinum, 126, 190. 

Chronicon Paschale, 126, 190 ; quoted, 

Chronology of Persians, 172 seq. 

Chrysostomus, text quoted, 245. 

Church Fathers, comparison of Phi. 
literature to patristic writings, 5. 

Cicero, 7 n. 4, 5 ; quoted, 169. 

Cigav, 22. 

Cikhshnush or Cakhshni, 18, 19. 

Cist, 193 and n. 1 ; 204. 

Ciz, 197. See also Shiz. 

Classical references to Z. in general, 
6 and App. V. ; to Z.'s asceticism, 
.34; to Z.'s date, 15, 152-157; to 
Z.'s native place, 186-191 ; to Z.'s 
death, 125 seq. 

Claudian, text quoted, 247. 

Clemens Alexandrinus, 6 n. 6 ; 7 n. 5 ; 
189 ; quoted, 169 ; text quoted, 240. 

Clemens Eomanus, text quoted, 238. 

Clementine Homilies, 125, 147. 

Clementine Recognitions, 125, 147. 

Comisene, 99. 

Comparison between Buddha and Zo- 
roaster, 1-2. 

Conferences with Archangels or Am- 
shaspands, 46-50, 207. 

Confucius, 1, 176. 

Conspiracy against Z., 62. 

Conversion of Vishtaspa, 56 seq. ; of 

the Brahman Cangranghacah, 85-88 ; 

of Lohrasp, 78 ; of Zarlr, 78. 
Conversions in Greece, 88-89 ; in India, 

84 ; in Turan, 83. 
Convert, Z.'s first, 37. See also Maidh- 

Cotelerius, text quoted, 253. 
Country of Z. discussed, 182-205. 
Court of Vishtaspa, 74. 
Crusade, 210. 
Ctesias, 155, 187 ; material in Diodorus 

Siculus, Georg. Syncell., 232, 252. 
Curzon, Hon. G. N., 39 n. 5; 216 

n. 2, 3. 
Cypress of Kishmar, 80, 217. 
Cyril, referred to, 169 ; text quoted, 

Cyrus, 91 n. 2 ; his name associated 

with Lohrasp, 209 ; his death, 177. 


Dabistan, quoted, 58-59, 89-90 n. 5 ; 
163, 202, 285. 

Dadvo, 128. 

Dahak, 91. 

Daltl. See Daitya. 

Daitya, Daiti, Daitih, river, 40, 42, 45, 
49, 196-197, 221 ; suggested identifi- 
cation, 211. 

Daklkl, a thousand lines by, incorpo- 
rated in the Shah Namah, 5 u. 2 ; 
mentioned, 109 ; drawn upon by Fir- 
dausi, 104, 208 ; end of quotation in 
Sh. N., 118. 

Dara, Darai, 158, 159, 161, 163. 

Darab D. P. Sanjana, on Z.'s date, 177. 

Daraja, 193, 195. See Dareja. 

Darbisht(?), 97, 224 n. 2. 

Darej. See Dareja. 

Dareja, Darej, river, 34, 49, 52, 193, 
196, 204. 

Darius, 167, 171 ; as Mazda-worship- 
per, 134. 

Darmesteter's view of Z., 3 n. 1 ; D. 
quoted, 149. 



Darshinika, 103. 
Daryai Rud, 195. 

Dasatir, text allusions quoted, 282-286. 
Date of Z. , 14 seq. and App. II. ; dis- 
cussed, App. II., 150-178. 
Davidson, Dr. T., 41 n. 3. 
DayuQ (Seno), 137 n. 6. 
Death of Z., 119, 124 seq.; at Balkh, 

Deinon, 8, 147 ; cited under Diogenes 

Laertius, 241. 
Departure (death) of Z. , 128. 
Derivation of name Z., 147-149. 
Devadatta, 37. 

Development of Z.'s religion, 93 seq. 
Dev&ia, M. G., on a Chinese allusion 

to Z., 279-280. 
Devil-worshippers, 223. See also Yezi- 

DInawar, 95. 
Dinkart, as source for Z.'s life, 5; its 

account of miracles, 24 ; quoted, 24, 

41, 96, 107, 211 n. 3. 
Dio Chrysostom, 34 ; text quoted, 236. 
Diodorus of Eretria, cited by Origen, 

Diodorus Siculus, 12 ; text quoted, 232. 
Diogenes Laertius, 6 n. 6 ; 9, 154, 189 ; 

text quoted, 241. 
Disciples of Z., 98, 137. 
Doctor Faustus, parallel, 31. 
Dosabhai Framji Karaka, 33 n. 4. 
Dughdavo, Dukdav, Duktailbo, Dugh- 

du, DughdSva, 18, 25, 192, 199. 
Dughdu, see preceding. 
Dilktaub, 25 ; see also preceding. 
Dunoker, referred to, 220. 
Durasrobo, a Karap, 28 ; plots against 

Z., 31; his death, 32. 


Early religious propaganda, 80 seq. 

Eobatana, 11. 

Edda, Snorra, quoted, 6 n. 3 ; 157 ; text 

alluding to Z., 286-287. 
ElissBUS, Armenian allusions to Z., 275. 

Epiphanius of Constantia, 188 ; text 

quoted, 244. 
Era of Z. discussed, 150-178. 
Erezraspa, 136. 

Etymology of Z.'s name, 125-126 ; dis- 
cussed, 147-149. 
Eubulus, cited by Porphyrins, 242. 
Euchologion. See under Anathemas, 

Eudemus of Rhodes, cited by Diogenes 

Laertius, 242. 
Eudoxus of Cnidus, 8, 152, 153 ; cited 

by Pliny and Diogenes Laertius, 234, 

Eusebius, 187-188 ; quoted, 156 ; text 

given, 243. 
Eutychius, quoted, 167-168. 
Events after Z.'s death, 133 seq. 
Exile of Jews, 11. 
Eznik, Armenian allusions to Z., 276. 


Family of Z., 10-22. 

Paris (Persia), 200. 

Pariumad, 216. 

Farnbag fire, 99, 217, 222. 

Farshldvard, 112 n. 8 ; 116, 119, 120, 

Farvadin Yasht, gives list of converts, 

Ferghanah, 39, 200, 206. 
Ferldun, 199. 
FirdausI, 208, 210; author of Shah 

Namah, 5 ; draws on DakikI, 104 ; 

especially referred to, 109, 118, 208, 

Fire of the priests, 99 ; of Z., 216. 
Fires, fire-temples, 98-100, 283 ; of Z., 

location, 222. 
Fire-worshippers in Shiz, 197. 
Floigl, on Z.'s date, 175. 
Florentine Picture-Chronicle, 293 n. 3. 
Form of Z.'s name, 12-13. 
Pounder of the Magi, Z., 6. 
Fraoreta, 222. Cf. also Fravartish, 




Frashaoshtra, name, 14 n. 1 ; 21, 22 ; 

as vizir, 76, 181 ; his death, 136. 
Prash-ham-vareta, 112 n. 8 ; 120 n. 1. 
Prashokara, Frasho-kareta, 112 n. 8. 
Frashoshtar, 77. See Frashaoshtra. 
Frata, 22. 
Fravartish, 141, 172, 222. See also 

Fraoreta, Phraortes. 
fravaH, 23, 24, 83, 141, 152. 
Frazdanava, 210, 211, 220, 221. 
Freni, daughter of Z., 21. 
Freno, 137. 

Froha, fire, 99. See Farnbag. 
FrSbak, iire, 217. See Farnbag. 
Fryana, 83-84. 


Gaevani, 22. 

Ganavat, 216. 

Gaotema, 177-178. 

Garami, 113, 115. 

Gathas, or Z. Psalms, 5, 23, 30, 38, 41, 

42, 44, 46, 54, 67, 69 n. 1 (references 

to Vishtaspa) ; 75, 83. 
Geiger, 104 n. 2 ; 186 n. 2 ; 213. 
Geldner, quoted, 2; view as to Z.'s 

date, 175. 
Genealogy of Z., 18. 
Geoponica, text quoted, 249. 
Georgius Cedremis, 126. See also 

Chron. Pasch., 251. 
Georgius Hamartolus, 126. See also 

Chron. Pasch., 251, 254. 
Georgius Syncellus, 153, 154, 155, 190 ; 

text quoted, 252. 
Ghazni, 211. 
Gilan, rivers in, 211. 
Gilan territory, 213, 222. 
Glycas, 126 ; text quoted, 256. 
Goarius, text quoted, 253. 
Gobryas, purported Magian, 8. 
Gobryas, 138. 
Gospels, quoted, 23. 
Gospel, spread of, 80 seq. 
Gottheil, cited, 6 n. 1 et passim ; espe- 
cially 280. 
GrsBoo-Baotrian coins, 208. 

Gray, L. H., notes, 226, 259-261. 
Greece, 6, 7 ; G. and Iran, 11 ; relations 

with Iran, 90. 
Greek accounts of Z.'s death, 124 seq. 
Greek conversions, fabled, 88-90. 
Greek forms of Z.'s name, 12. 
Gregorius, cited by Michael Glycas, 

Gregory of Tours, 126, 190; text quoted, 

Grehma, 44. 

Guardian Spirit. See fravaH. 
Gumbadan, 118, 131. 
Gunabad, 216. 
Gurdoe, 121, 122. 
Gurgsar, 109, 110, 111. 
Gushasp. See Gushnasp. 
Gushnasp fire, 100. 
Gushtasp. See Vishtaspa. 


HaScat-aspa, 18, 19, 75, 76. 
Ham, 125, 126, 157. 
Hamartolus, 1 26. See Georgius Hamar- 
tolus, 251, 254. 
Hamzah of Isfahan, quoted, 199, 224. 
Hanhaurvao, 22. 
Haoma appears to Z., 50. 
Haosrava, 215. 
Hara Berezaiti. See Alborz. 
Harlez, C. de, on Z.'s date, 175 ; view 

on original home of Zoroastrianism, 

Hang, quoted, 148 ; on Z.'s date, 175. 
Haurvatat confers with Z., 49. 
Healing of a blind man by Z., 94. 
Hecataeus, cited by Diog. Laert., 242. 
Hellanicus of Lesbos, cited by Georg. 

Syncell., 252. 
Heraclides Ponticus, 8 ; also cited by 

Plutarch, Anathemas, and Petrus 

Siculus, 236, 253. 
Herennius, or Philo of Byblus. See 

under Eusebius, 243. 
Hermippus, 152, 153 ; cited by Pliny, 

234 ; Diog. Laert., 242. 



Hermodorus, 6 n. 6 ; his reputed Ma- 
giaa studies, 90 ; cited by Diog. 
Laert., 241. 

Herodotus, on Magi, 7 ; does not men- 
tion Z., 8 (see also 35, 155) ; is cited 
by Georg. Syncell., 252. 

Hieronymus, text quoted, 245. 

Hilmend, 137 n. 5. 

Hilmend, Hermand, 212 n. 2. 

Hindus, 117. 

Hindus, converted, 84, 87. 

Hindustan, 117. 

Hirth, Dr. F., on Z. in Chinese litera- 
ture, 278-279. 

Historical personage, Z. as such, 

Holy Communing Ones, 34, 194 n. 1 ; 

Holy War, first, 108 seq. ; second, 120 

Holy Wars, 103 seq. ; summarized, 122. 
See also 210, 213, 217. 

Horn. See Haoma. 

Home of Z., 16 seq., 193 seq. 

Hom-plant, fravaH in it, 25. 

Horn-water from Daitya, 41, 45. 

Horn, view cited, 218. 

Hosthanes (Ostanes'), 138, 238, 248. 

Houtum-Sohindler, quoted, 100, 215, 

Hrazdan, 211, 220 n. 5 ; 221. 

Hugo de St. Victore, text quoted, 188, 

Hums, 72. 

Humal. See Huma. 

Humal, 158, 159, 163, 209. 

Humak, 115. 

Humayaka, 103. 

Huns, 221, 222. 

Hunu, a Karap, 43. 

Hushdiv, 109, 110, 112. 

Hushyaothna, 22. 

Hutaosa, 68, 70, 193 n. 2. 

Hiltos. See Hutaosa. 

Huvaxsatara, 222. 

Hvadaena, 22. 

Hvarecithra, son of Z., 21. 

hvardnak, 24. 

Hvobas, 136. 

Hvogva, 22, 76, 77. 

Hvovi, wife of Z., 21, 22, 76. 

Hvovid family tree, 22. 

H-yaona, 108, 115, 123, 213, 220-222, 

Hyaonians led by ArejaJ-aspa, 104. 
Hyrcania, 219. 
Hystaspes, same name as Vishtaspa, 

16, 167, 171 ; his relations to India, 

207. See also 220. 

lamblichus, 7 n. 5. 

Ibn al-AthIr, 88, 39, 166 ; quoted, 199- 

Ibn al-Hamadhani, quoted, 198. 

Ibn Khurdadhbah, quoted, 198. 

Image of Z., purported, 288-293. 

India, 11, 207 ; Z. in, 39 ; conversions 
■ in, 84 ; relations to Persia, 87 n. 1 ; 
210 n. 4. 

Interviews with Archangels or Amsha- 
spands, 46-50, 207. 

Invasion by Arjasp, 108-109. 

Iran at Z.'s time, 10-11 ; spread of re- 
ligion in, 82 ; enmity with Turan, 
103 ; eastern, 218-219 ; western, 

Iranian sources of information, 5. 

Iranian tradition of Z.'s death, 127. 

Isat-vastra, son of Z., 21. 

Isfendlar, Spento-data, 67, 72, 77-78, 
82, 84, 105, 112, 113, 283 ; as cru- 
sader, 117 ; is calumniated, 117 ; im- 
prisoned, 125 ; his death, 121. See 
also 134, 158. 

Isidorus, 188 ; text quoted, 251. 

Istakhr, 91 n. 3 ; 97, 219-220, 222, 224 
n. 2. 

Isvant, 83. 

Jagatal, 119, 216. 
Jamasp. See Jamaspa. 



Jamaspa, 67, 75 n. 2 ; 76, 77, 86, 108, 
120, 181 ; son-in-law of Z. , 21, 22 ; 
writes down the Avesta, 117 ; his 
death, 136, 137. 

jaradgava, 14. 

jaratkdru, 14. 

Jemshed, 11 n. 1; 23, 99. 

Jeremiah, 163, 165, 166, 197-198 ; re- 
puted as teacher of Z., 30, 38. 

Jerome, text quoted, 245. 

Jerusalem destroyed by Lohrasp, 91 
n. 2. 

Jews, captivity of, 11. 

Jihun, Oxus, 114, 213, 214. 

Johannes Lydus, 247. 

Johannes Malalas, 126. See Chron. 
Pasch., 251. 

Judaism, alluded to, 1, 142. 

Justi, view cited, 141 ; on Z.'s date, 
175 ; view on Z.'s native place, 221- 

Justin, quoted, 156, 187 ; text given, 

K in Greek names. See C. 

Kabul, Kavul, 99, 217. 

Kai. See Kavi. 

Kain, 215. 

kai Us, 24. 

Kama, K. E., on Z.'s date, 175. 

Kandar, 120. 

Karaka, Dosabhai Pramji, cited, 289. 

Karaps, 28, 42. 

Katayun, 71, 73. 

Katha^sarit-sagara, cited, 27 n. 4. 

Kavarazem, 117. 

Kavig, son of Kundah, 94, 181. 

Kavis and Karpans, 28. 

Kavul, Kabiil, 99, 217. 

Kayanian, home of the dynasty, 211. 

Kazwini, 34 ; quoted, 195, 201. 

Kerdui, 121, 122. 

Kern on Z. as a mythical personage, 

3n. 1. 
Khallakh, Khallukh, 107, 109, 116, 213. 
Khashash, 109, 110. 

Khatal, 214. 

Khorasmia, 99. 

Khorassan 94, 100, 116, 118, 119, 123, 

141, 214-218. 
Khordad, 99. 

Khshathra Vairya, confers with Z., 47. 
Khtir, 128. 

Khurdat. See Haurvatat. 
Khurrad, 99. 
Khvandamir, 219. 
Khvarizem, 217. 
Khyon. See H'yaona. 
Kiash, Kawasjee, DInshah, quoted, 291. 
Kig. See Kavi. 
Kigs and Karaps, 28, 42. 
Kishmar, cypress of, 80, 97, 100, 217. 
Kitaban, 71, 73. See Katayiin. 
Kizel Uzen river, ancient Daitya(?), 
" 41, 49, 207, 211. 
Knowledge, Z.'s scientific, 96. 
Koran, 142. 

KroU, authority cited, 260-261. 
Kuhram, 109, 110, 111, 120, 122. 
Kumis, 99. 
Kumlsh, 216. 
Kundah, 94. 
Kurazm, 117. 
Kusti, assumed by Z., 32. 
Kyaxares, 222. 

Lactantius, 7 n. 5 ; 190 ; quoted, 

Lagarde, referred to, 220. 

Lalita Vistara, 26. 

Lanman, referred to, 8 n. 4 ; 293 n. 3. 

Lassen, 12 n. 2 ; 148. 

Latin accounts of Z.'s death, 124 seq. 

Lehmann, view cited, 221. 

Logia of Z., 8, 168, 259-273. 

Lohrasp, 78 ; crowns Vishtaspa, 73 ; 
destroys Jerusalem, 91 n. 2 ; death, 
118, 130-131, 212 ; name associated 
with Nebuchadnezzar, 162, 209. See 
199-201. See also Aurvat-aspa. 

Lord, Henry, cited, 148. 

Losses in the Holy Wars, 116. 



Luoian, 7 n. 5 ; 169 ; text quoted, 237. 
Lydus, Johann., text quoted, 247. 


Madofryat, 216. 

Magi, Z. an arch-representative, 6 ; 
Median tribe, Z. as founder, 7 ; 
reputed teachers of Pythagoras and 
Plato, 7, 8. 

Magian worship, 7 ; doctrines, 90 ; fire- 
worship, 98 ; priests, 138 ; priest- 
hood, 141, 142. 

Magians, 195. 

Magika Logia of Z., 259-273. 

Maidyoimanha, Maidhyoi-maonha, Z.'s 
cousin and first convert, 13 n. 6 ; 20, 
37, 54, 75, 137, 180, 196, 206. 

Majdi, cited, 220. 

Malalas, Johann., 126. See Chron. 
Pasch., 251. 

Malcolm, Sir John, quoted, 290. 

Manichseism, 142. 

Manichseans, anathemas against, 
quoted, 253. 

Manflshcihar. See Manush-oithra. 

Manush-oithra, 18, 119, 193. 

Marcellinus, text quoted, 244. 

Marriage, next-of-kin, 43. 

Masudi, quoted, 162-163 ; on date of Z., 
173 ; text quoted, 199. 

Mazda-worship, 134. 

Meaning of name Spitiima, 13 ; of Z.'s 
name, 12-14, 147-149. 

Medes, 176. 

Media, 17, 22, 73, 141, 142, 184, 189- 
190, 196 n. 1 ; 206, 218, 224; view as 
to Z.'s ministry, 219-222 ; view as to 
cradle of Z.'s faith, 219; Media 
Atropatene, 51, 192 ; see also Adar- 
haijan; Media Ehagiana, 51, 197, 
206 ; see also Eal. 

Median kingdom, 11; origin of Visht- 
aspa, 213. 

Merv, 114, 214, 225. 

Mesh-hed, 215. 

Messiah, idea of, 21. 

MetySmah, cousin of Z., 40. See also 

Michael Glycas, 126, 190, 256. 
Mihr, town, 100. 
Mills, view on Gathas, 217-218. 
Ministry, Z. enters upon his, 35, 36. 
Miracles hef ore Z. 's birth, 24. 
Mirkhond, 34, 215 n. 5. 
Mithra, 100 ; cult, 34 n. 3 ; possible 

representation of, 292. 
Mithraic mysteries, 194 n. 1. 
MIyan-i dasht, 216. 
Modi, J. J., cited, 178. 
Mohammed, 206 ; beholds Gabriel, 40. 
Mohammedan conquest, 138. 
Mohammedan calendar, 164. 
Mohammedan allusions to Z., 280-282. 
Mohammedan writers on Z.'s native 

place, 197-201. 
Moses of Khorene, 187 ; his allusions to 

Z. given, 274-275. 
Moslem power, 142. 
Mother of Z., 18, 20. 
Mountain of Holy Communing, 34, 

194 n. 1. 
Mujmal al-TawarIkh, 164, 281. 
Mtiller, Pr., quoted, 148 ; F. Max, 179. 
Murdat. See Ameretat. 
Mythological view of Z. , criticised, 3. 


Nahld. See Katayun. 

Naidhyah Gaotema, 177-178. 

Naksh-i Eustam, 292. 

Name Zarathushtra, 12. 

Name of Zoroaster, 12 seq. ; discussed, 

Namkhvast, 107, 111, 112. 
Naotairya, 70. 
Naotairyans, 193 n. 2 ; 222. 
Narlman, 22. 
Nask, 136. 

Nasks, books of Avesta,' 8, 95. 
Nastiir. See Bastavairi. 
Native place of Z. , 16 seq. ; discussed, 




Nebuchadnezzar, 162 ; associated with 

Lohrasp, 209. 
Neo-Platonic scliool, 142. 
SFgryosang, an angel, 66. 
Nevzar, 113, 115. 
Next-of-kin marriages, 43. 
Nicolaus of Damascus, 232 ; quoted, 

Nimrod, 125. 
Nineveh, fall of, 11. 
Ninus and Z., 15, 151, 154-157, 186- 

188, 217, 274-278. 
Nisaea, 98. 

Nishapur, 98, 100, 119, 215-216. 
Nivetish, brother of Z., 20. 
Niyatus, 89, 90. 

Nizami, his Iskander Namah, 282. 
Nodhas, 178. 
Non-Iranian sources of information as 

toZ., 6. 
Notar, Notars, 135, 192, 204, 210, 222. 
Notariga, brother of Z., 20. 
Nurakh, 89. 
Nush-Adar, 113, 118, 129. 


Odatis, 73. 

Oppert, quoted, 148. 

Oracles of Zoroaster, text given, 259- 

Ordeal established, 97. 
Origen, quoted, 189 ; text quoted, 

Ormazd (Ormizd), 277; picture, 291. 

See Ahura Mazda. 
Ormazd, son of Vishtasp, 113. 
'fiptiao-Tos, Gk. form of Z.'s name, 

'ilpofidtrdT]^, 171. 
Oroomiah. See Caecista. 
Orosius, 127, 188; quoted, 156; text 

quoted, 246. 
Orpheus, 235. 
Ostanes, 138 ; cited under Pliny and 

under Eusebius, 234, 243. 
Oxus, 114, 213, 214. 
Oxyartes, 155. 

Padashklivargar, 216. 
Pahlavi form of Z.'s name, 13. 
Pahlavi literature as a source of infor- 
mation, 5, 23 ; references to Vishtr- 

aspa, 62 n. 2. 
Pakhad, 22. 
Palestine, 197 ; according to some, Z. 

a native of, 38, 197. 
Panodorus, cited by Georg. Syncellus, 

Pars, 215. 
Parshatgao, Parshat-gau, 22, 207 n. 1 ; 

Parsis, 33, 138, 142. 
Patiragtaraspo, 20. 
Pat-khusrav, 112, 115. 
Pazates, 138. 
Persepolis, 97, 220, 224. 
Persia, 95, 141-142, 171, 184-185, 189- 

190 ; in Chinese literature, 279- 

Persian lawgiver, 11. 
Persian spellings of Z.'s name, 13. 
Persian wars, 7. 
Peshana, 103. 
Peshocingha, 103. 
Peshotan. See Peshotanu. 
Peshotanu, 66, 113. 
Peshyotan. See Peshotanu. 
Petrus Comestor, text quoted, 256. 
Philo of By bios. See under Eusebius, 

Photius, text quoted, 254. 
Phraortes, 172, 222. See also Era- 

oreta, Eravartish. 
Pictures of Z., reputed, 288-293. 
Plato, purported Zoroastrian studies, 

7 n. 6 ; reputed Magian studies, 90 ; 

referred to, 142 ; text quoted, 231. 
Platonic Alcibiades, 6 n. 6 ; 9, 153, 189. 
Platonis Vita, quoted, 231. 
Pletho, Gemistus, 8. 
Pliny, 6 n. 6 ; 138, 153, 169, 170, 189 ; 

mentions Z.'s birth, 27 ; text quoted, 




Plutarch, 6 n. 6 ; 8 n. 4 ; quoted, 153, 

169 ; text given, 235. 
Polyhistor. See Alexander Polyhistor 

and Solinus Polyhistor, 233, 244, 252. 
Porphyrins, 7 n. 5 ; 34, 189 ; quoted, 

169 ; text given, 242. 
Porter, Sir E. Ker, quoted, 289-290. 
Portraits of Z., purported, 289-293. 
Poriicast. See PourucistS. 
Poriishaspo. See Poumshaspa. 
PourucistS, 13 n. 6 ; 75, 77 ; daughter 

of Z., 21, 22. 
Pourushaspa, 19, 20, 131, 192 ; father 

of Z., 24, 25, 29. 
Preaching of Z. begun, 42. 
Priests, their fire, 99. 
Procopius of Gaza, text quoted, 248. 
Prodicus, 8. 

Promulgation of the Gospel, 80 seq. 
Prophecies, of Z.'s coming, 23; of 

future events, 138. 
Prophecy of Christ by Z., 98. 
Prudentius, text quoted, 246. See 

Aurelius Prudentius. 
Psalms of David, comparison, 75. 
Piirshasp. See Pourushaspa. 
Pythagoras, reputed study of Magian 

doctrines, 7. See also 90, 91, 142. 
Pyrasa of Magi, 217. See also Pires, 



Q, on Arabic forms in, see K. 


Eaga, 202 seq. 

'Viyai, 202. 

Ragh. See Rak, 204. 

Eagha, 17, 85, 192. 

Eai. See Eagha. 

Eaja Bimbisara, 37. 

Eak, Eagh, 192-193. 

Eangushtar, brother of Z., 20. 

Eanha, 223. 

Eatilshtar, brother of Z. , 20. 

Eawlinson, G. and H. , quoted, 148, 291. 

Eevand, 215. 

Eidge of Vishtasp, 216. 

Eoth, on Z.'s date, 175. 

Eoth, view cited, 218. 

Eadbar, 215 n. 5. 

Eum or Asia Minor, 84, 88. 

Eum, 99, 117, 210. 

Eustam, 121. 


Sabalan Mt., 34, 195. 

Sacred fires, 98-100, 222. 

Sacrifices of Vishtaspa, 212-213. 

Saena, 137 n. 6 ; 178. 

Safed river, 41, 49. 

Safed Eud, 211. 

Sagastan. See Seistan. 

SahendMts., 49. 

Saka-stana. See Seistan. 

Sama Keresaspa, 22. 

Samaria, 142. 

S'aiikara-Acarya, 87. 

Sankarakas, 284. See also Cangrang- 

Saoshyant, 21. 
Savalan Mt., 195. 
Scene of battles between Vishtaspa and 

Arejat-aspa, 216. 
Scene of Z.'s ministry, 15 ; discussed, 

Scholasticus Bassus, text quoted, 249. 

See also Geoponioa. 
Scholiast of the Platonic Alcibiades, 

34, 36 n. 2. 
Scholion to Plato, text quoted, 231. 
Schuyler, M., Jr., 178, 277. 
Scientific books of Z., 8. 
Scientific knowledge of Z., 95. 
Sculptured portraits of Z. reproduced, 

288 seq. 
Seistan, 17 ; Z.'s journey thither, 44, 

45 ; early propaganda there, 45 n. 3 ; 

212 ; other allusions, 82, 99, 118, 

131, 137, 207, 208, 214. 
Semiramis and Z., 15, 151, 154-157, 

186-187; war with Z., 217; her 

name associated with Z., 274-278. 



Seno, 137 and n. 6 ; 181, 212. 

Seven Conferences, 36 seq. , 40. 

Shah Namah, a source of information 
regarding Z., 5 and n. 2; cited, 78 
n. 4 ; 80 et passim ; dates of dynas- 
ties, 164. 

Shahrasfcani, quoted, 94-95, 199. 

Shakspere-Bacon controversy as an 
illustration, 4. 

Shapan, 224. 

Shapigan, 97. 

bhasplgan, 224. 

Shatver. See Khshathra Vairya. 

Shedasp, 113, 115. 

Shelley, view of Z., 50 n. 2. 

Shero, 112, 115. 

Shet river, 211 n. 3. 

Shikand-gumanik-Vijar, 57. 

Shiz. Cf. Caecista, Ciz, 195, 197, 201- 
202, 204. 

Shizigan, 224. 

Significance of Z. 's name, 13 seq. 

Simachus, cited under Agathias, 249. 

Simakos. See Symmachos. 

Smerdis, relation to Z.'s date, 167. 

Snorra Bdda Preface, alludes to Z., 
text quoted, 151, 286-287. 

Socrates, 1. 

Solinus, text quoted, 244. 

Solinus Polyhistor, text quoted, 244. 

Soma and eagle myth, 25 n. 1. 

'ZiIidacTpoi, variant of Z.'s name, 12 n. 2. 

Sources of information about Z.'s life, 
5 ; of material for Z.'s seven con- 
ferences, 38-40. 

SSvar, lake, 100. 

Spaeitita Bazura, 215. 

Sped river, 41, 49. 

Spelling of Zoroaster's name, 12. 

Spend-dat. See Isfendiar. 

Spend Nask, referred to, 26. 

Spend-yat, for Spento-data, 215. 

Spenta Armaiti confers with Z., 48. 

Spento-data, mount, 118, 215. See also 

Spmto-frasnA, 34, 194 n. 1 ; 195. 

Spet-razhur, 214. 

Spiegel, on Z. as a historical personage, 
3 n. 1 ; view on original home of 
Zoroastrianism, 220. 

Spinjaurusha, 103. 

Spitama, 18. 

SpitSma, name, 12, 13. 

STTiTO/xas, S7ri9d/i7)S, 13 n. 6. 

Spltamas, home of the, 24. 

Spiti, 136. 

Spread of the religion, 135-136. 

Srito, 135, 180. 

Srito, 137. 

Statue, purported to represent Z., 289- 

Successors of Z., 137. 

Suidas, 6 n. 6 ; 126 ; quoted, 154, 157, 
169, 190, 255. 

Su-lu-tsche, Chinese name of Z., 279. 

Sunkellos. See Georgius Syncellus. 

Symmachos (Simakos), cited by Aga- 
thias, 249. 

Syriac authors, quoted, 98, 165-166, 
288 ; sources of information as to Z. , 
6, 280-282 et passim. 

Tabari, 38 ; quoted, 166, 198, 209, 224 
n. 2. 

Tahmasp, 22. 

Tajan. See Tojan. 

Takht-i Bostan, reputed sculpture of 
Z. there, 289-292. 

Takht-i Suleiman, 195 n. 1. 

Tanais, 73. 

Tantra philosophy, 210 n. 4. 

Tsthryavant, 103, 210 n. 4. 

Tejend river, 47 n. 5. 

Temples of fire. See Fire. 

Temptation of Z., paralleled in Bud- 
dhism and Christianity, 53 ; alluded 
to, 207. 

Thales, 161 ; contemporary of Z., 168. 

Theodoretus of Cyrus, text quoted, 247. 

Theodoras of Mopsuestia, cited under 
Photius, 254. 

Theologumena Arithmetica, text given, 



Theon, quoted, 156, 187 ; text given, 

Theopompus, 8 ; reputed Magian stud- 
ies, 90 ; cited under Diogenes Laer- 
tius and jEneas of Gaza, 242, 248. 

Thomas Arzrouni, Armenian annalist, 
217 ; his allusions to Z., 276-278. 

Thomas, Edw., cited, 291. 

Thriti, daughter of Z., 21. 

Tianur, 89, 90. 

Tiele, quoted, 171-172 ; view cited, 218 
n. 5. 

Tojan water, conference at, 47. 

Tradition, importance of, 39. 

Turan, 11 ; conversions in, 83. 

Turan and Iran, enmity, 103. 

Turanians, storm Balkh, 212. 

Turbaraturhash, 131. 

Tur-I Bratarvakhs, 127-129. 

Tur-i Bratrok-resh, 127-129. 

Turkestan, 214. 

Turks, Z. among the, 39. 

Tutianush, 89, 90, 283. 


Ukhshyat-ereta, 21, 155. 

Ukhshyat-nemah, 21. 

'Ulama-i Islam, 282. 

Urumiah, Z.'s reputed birthplace, 17, 
30, 48, 49, 96, 165, 197-198 ; Uru- 
miah Lake, 39 n.'5. 

Ururvija, grandson of Z., 20 n. 3 ; 21. 

Urvatatnara, son of Z., 21. 

Us, Kal, 24. 

uUra in names, 14, 148, 149. 

TJxsyat-ereta, 21, 155. 

Vaedvoisht, not converted by Z., 43. 

Valerius Maximus, 7 n. 5 ; 169. 

Vandaremaini, 109. 

'Varof Revand,' 215. 

Varaza, 83. 

Varedhaka, 221. 

Vareshna, 22. 

Vedantist philosopher, 87. 

Vedas, 178. 

Vendidad, 1. 15, quoted, 202-203 ; 19. 
1-10, translated, 51-53 ; 19. 11, 194 ; 
22. 19, 194 n. 1. 

Victorinus, text quoted, 245. See Af er. 

Victory, final, of Zoroastrianism, 121. 

VIdrafsh, envoy of Arejat-aspa, 107, 
115, 116. 

Vishtaspa, 151 ; (Vishtasp) patron of 
Z., 21 ; sought by Z., 38-39 ; abode 
of, 58, 223 ; meets Z., 59 ; has a vis- 
ion, 66 ; references to, in Gathas, 69 
n. 1 ; Pahlavi references to, 69 n. 2 ; 
his court, 57, 74 ; children and fam- 
ily, 71 ; his date, 158, 180-181, 199, 
201 ; springs from Notar, 193 n. 2 ; 
204 ; he is a dair^hupaiti, 222 ; story 
of his youth, 72, 210 ; he goes toward 
Rum and later returns to Iran, 73, 
110 ; his residence and kingdom, 210, 
223 ; his meeting with Z. and his con- 
version, 37, 59 seq., 64 seq., 209; 
date of this event, 164 ; influence of 
his conversion, and rejoicing that he 
has received the religion, 74 ; his 
brother and father converted, 78 ; his 
religious zeal, 81 ; makes the religion 
current in the land, 81 ; founds fire 
temples, 98 ; removes the Farnbag 
fire to the east, 99 ; wars against 
Arejat-aspa, 102 seq. ; receives from 
Arejat-aspa an ultimatum, 107 ; in- 
vokes divine aid, 103 ; army, 112 ; 
first victory over Arjasp, 116 ; out- 
lives Z., 135 ; he is said to have been 
at Istakhr, 219-220 ; situation of the 
Ridge of Vishtaspa, 216. 

Vision, seen by Z. of the future, 97 ; 
by Vishtaspa, 66. 

Visions of Archangels (Amshaspands), 

Visraps, 135. 

Vita Platonis, text quoted, 231. 

Vohuman. See Vohu Manah. 

Vohuman, King. See Artashir, 82. 

Vohuman, son of Spend-dat, 133, 158. 



Vohu Manah, 83 ; brings Z.'s frava i, 

24; reveals himself to Z., 40, 41; 

his conference with Z., 46 ; leads Z. 

to Ahura Mazda, 36 ; protector of 

cattle, 46. 
Volmmano. See Vohu Manah. 
Vohunem, 137. 
Vohunemah, 22, 137. 
Vohustra, name, 14 n. 1. 
Vourukasha, 211. 
vrsan-as'vd, 100. 
Vyasa, 88, 284 n. 4. 


War of Religion. See Holy Wars. 

Warren, W. R., 41 n. 3. 

Wars, Holy, 102 seq. ; waged against 

Arejat-aspa, 103 seq. ; number of, 

105 ; causes of the first, 106 ; events 

of the first, 105-118 ; Zairivairi, hero 

in the first, 105. 
West, E. W., cited, 5, 15, 45 n. 3 ; 47 

n. 4; 58 n. 2; 59 n. 2 ; 112 n. 8; 

187 n. 5 ; on date of Z., 15, 174 ; on 

Zoroastrian chronology, 179-181. 
White Forest, 119 ; its location, 214- 

White India, 207 and n. 2. See also 

Wilhelm, E., cited, 84n. 2 ; view cited, 

Williams, Dr. F. W., 279. 
Windischmann, 147, 148. 
Wisdom of the Magi, 6. 
Witchcraft, 96. 
Wonders of Sagastan, 137 n. 5 ; 209 ; 

quoted, 212. 
Writing down of the Avesta, 97, 117. 

Xanthus of Lydia, 9 ; cited under 
Nicolaus of Damascus and Diogenes 
Laertius, 232, 241. 

Xenophon does not mention Z., 9. 

Xerxes, 128. 

Yakut, 34 n. 2 ; 204 ; allusions to Z., 
281-282 ; quoted, 197, 200. 

Yasht, 5. 108, 210 ; 13. 99-100, trans- 
lated, 81 ; 83. 4, 223. 

Yasna, 19. 18, quoted, 203 ; 46. 1, 207 ; 
46. 12, translated, 83 ; 46. 14 seq., 
translated, 76-77. 

Yatkar-i Zariran, § 52-56, quotation, 

Yazatas in Bundahishn, 50 n. 1. 

Yezd, portrait of Z. there, 288-289. 

Yezldis, 31, 223, 224. 

Yima, Yim, 11 n. 1 ; 23, 99. 

Yoishto yo FryanSm, 84. 

Yosht-I Fryano, 84. 

Yunan (i.e. Greece), 89. 

Yunani (i.e. Greek), 283. 

Zabulistan, 118, 212. 

Zairivairi, brother of Vishtaspa, 70, 

77 ; hero in first Holy War, 105. 

See also 85, 99, 108, 112, 114, 115, 

223 n. 4. 
Zak, a Karap, 57, 59. 
ZapdSijs, Gk. variant of Z.'s name, 12. 
^Zara'^uUra, supposed western form 

of Z.'s name, 13 n. 1. 
Zarafiustra, meaning of name, 12 seq. 
Zarathushtra. See Zoroaster. 
Zdparos, Gr. variant of Z.'s name, 12. 
Zaratusht, Phi. form of Z.'s name, 13. 
Zaratusht. See Zoroaster. 
Zaravastes, 12 n. 5. 
Zaraven, an Armenian form of Z.'s 

name, 12. 
Zarbisht (?), 97, 224 n. 2. 
Zardusht, Mod. Pers. form of Z.'s 

name, 13. See also Zoroaster. 
Zar6r. See Zairivairi. 
Zctpijs, Gk. variant of Z.'s name, 12. 
Zariadres, 73, 223 n. 4. 
Zarir, 77-78. See also Zairivairi. 
Zarshtan, 115. 



Zartusht Namah, date and translation, 
5 and n. 1 ; passage quoted, 39. See 
also 293. 

ZaSpoiio-TTjs, 6k. variant of Z.'s name, 

Zat-sparam, as source for Z.'s life, 5; 
quoted, 32-33, 40, 204. 

Zup6a5os, 6k. variant of Z.'s name, 12. 

Zoroaster (Zarathushtra, Zaratusht, 
Zardusht), as a religious teacher, 1 ; 
compared vrith. Buddha, 1-3 ; as a 
historical personage, 3-4 ; a Magian 
and founder of the Magi, 6, 141, 275, 
277 ; called an astrologer, 125 ; is an 
Iranian, 10 ; is called Pers. law- 
giver, 11 ; sources of our knovrledge 
regarding him : Avesta, Pahlavi, 
Arabic writings, 5-6 ; not men- 
tioned in Ancient Pers. Inscriptions, 
5. — Nameof Z. and its Mean- 
ing, 12, 18, 125, 147-149 (discus- 
sion) ; form in Armenian, 274-278 ; 
in Chinese, 280 ; in 6reek, Latin, 
Pahlavi, Persian, 12, etc. — Date 
o f Z., 14 seq. ; his date referred to, 
22 ; question of two Zoroasters, 153 ; 
date discussed, 150-178 ; date of his 
death, 180-182 ; is confused with 
other persons by some writers of 
antiquity, e.g. he is by some identi- 
fied with Ham, 125 ; also identified 
with Nimrod, 125 ; is said to be a 
contemporary of Smerdis, 167 ; or a 
contemporary of Cambyses, 167 ; his 
purported war with Ninus, 217 ; 
according to some he was made gov- 
ernor of Assyria, 275, 277 ; Z.'s 
name is associated by some Moham- 
medan authors with Jeremiah, who 
is even called his teacher, 30, 38, 163, 
165, 166 ; name associated with Bel, 
Baal, Balaam, 15 n. 3 ; 286 ; name is 
associated with Ninus and Semiramis, 
274-278. —Native Place of Z. 
and Scene of his Ministry: 
his birthplace referred to and his 
native home in Iran discussed, 22, 

182-205 ; according to some Moham- 
medan assertions he was a native of 
Palestine, 38 ; tradition as to his 
native city, 197 ; statements connect- 
ing Z. with Ragh, 204; conclusion 
as to his native place, 205 ; scene of 
his ministry discussed, 205-224. — 
Main Events of his Life : 
Z.'sfamily, 10-22 ; ancestry, 17seq. ; 
father and mother, 18, see also Pou- 
rushaspa, Dughdhova ; brothers, 20 ; 
his ancestral tree, 19, 20 ; his coming 
foretold, 23 ; triumph over demons 
foreseen, 27 ; is fdreordained to be 
the prophet of Ahura Mazda, 27 ; his 
birth is attended by prodigies, 26 ; he 
laughs instead of cries, 27 ; Ahriman 
flees, 27 ; Z.'s youth and education, 
29 ; he is taught by Burzin-Kurils, 
30; orbyAganaces, 30; we find Z.'s 
name associated with Jeremiah, 30 ; 
according to some legends a pupil or 
disciple of Jeremiah, 38, 163, 166 ; 
by some he is identified with Baruch, 
30 ; assumes the Kusti, 32 ; his mar- 
riage and his wives, 20, 33 ; his 
children, 21 ; his religious prepara- 
tion, 32-35 ; eclecticism in religious 
matters, 33 ; asceticism according to 
the classics, 34 ; he crosses the Dai- 
tya, 40, 211 ; Tohu Manah meets him 
and leads him into the presence of 
Ahura Mazda, 36 ; his first vision, 
40 ; he holds converse with Ahura 
Mazda, 41 ; he beholds visions of the 
Archangels (Amshaspands), 46-50; 
his second vision and conference with 
Vohu Manah, 46 ; third vision and 
conference with Asha Vahishta, 47 ; 
fourth vision and conference with 
Khshathra Vairya, 47 ; fifth vision 
and conference with Spenta Armaiti, 
48 ; sixth vision and conference with 
Haurvatat, 49 ; seventh vision and 
conference with Ameretat, 49 ; be- 
holds an apparition of Haoma, 50 ; 
sees other visions, 50 ; his tempta- 



tion, 51-53, 207 ; receives instruc- 
tion and enters upon his ministry, 
34-35 ; begins preaching, 42, 196 ; 
preaches next-of-kin marriage, 43 ; 
tries to convert Vaedvoisht, 43 ; his 
wanderings, 200, 207 ; statements 
that he was in India, China, and 
among the Turanians, 39 ; in Seis- 
tan, 44 ; he tries to convert Parshat, 
44, 45 ; is for a time in the region of 
the Caspian Sea, 46, 47 ; prays to 
Ardvi Sura, 57 ; seeks Vishtaspa and 
meets him, 38-39, 59, 209 ; disputes 
with the wise men at V.'s court, 61, 
283 ; conspiracy against him, 62 ; he 
is imprisoned, 62 ; heals the king's 
horse, 62 ; he then converts Visht- 
aspa, 64 ; meets the Archangels, 
65 ; he instructs Vishtaspa, 74 ; af- 
terwards he converts the Brahman 
Cangranghacah, 85-88 ; did he visit 
Bahylon ? 90 ; his scientific know- 
ledge and purported scientific books, 
8, 95 ; converts a Kavig, 94 ; heals 
a Wind man, 94 ; sees a revelation of 
the future, 97 ; is said to have proph- 
esied of Christ, 97-98 ; his successor 
is Jamaspa, 76 ; other apostles and 
disciples, 98, 136-138 ; purported 
sculptured portraits, 289-293 ; death 
at age of seventy-seven years, 119, 

124, 127, 181, 212. —Allusions 
to Z., in the classics and in other 
literatures, 6 and App. V., VI. ; cited 
under Pliny, Clemens Alex., Euse- 
bius, Jineas of Gaza, Origenes, Geo- 
ponica, 234, 240, 243, 248 ; allusions 
to him in Armenian literature, 274- 
278 ; alluded to by Moses of Khorene, 
translation of passage given, 274- 
275 ; alluded to by Elisaeus, 276 ; by 
Eznik, 276 ; by Thomas Arzrouni, 
276-278 ; allusions to him in Chi- 
nese, 279-280 ; allusions to him in 
Syriao and Arabic literature, 281 ; 
in Mohammedan writings, 280-282. 

Zapod<rTp7]s and other Gk. forms of Z.'s 
name, 12. 

Zoroastrian calendar, 174. 

Zoroastrian chronological tables, 179- 

Zoroastrian Logia, 168, 259 seq. 

Zoroastrian victories, 116 seq. 

Zoroastrianism, Holy Wars of, 102 seq. ; 
later development of, 133 seq. ; mod- 
ern, 142-143; spread of, 135-136; 
view as to eastern origin of, 186- 
188, 208-219; view as to western 
origin of, 189 seq., 219 seq. 

Zradasht, Armenian form of Z. 's name, 
13, 274-278. 

Zrvan, 274-278. 



1. On Iranian geography, see especially Geiger in Qrundriss der Iran. Philol. 

371-394, where a Bibliography is given. 

2. Avestan, Pahlavi, or Ancient Persian names in the list are designat 


3. Conjectural identifications are indicated by (?) or by 'prob.' (probably) 

Abbasabad Gb 

Adarbaijan (Azerbijan) ABCabc 
Airyana Vaejali = Adarbaijan? ABCabc 

Alburz Mts. CDEFb 

Alvand Mt. Cc 
Amu Darja (see Oxus) 

Aras (Araxes) Ba 

Ardabil Ca 
Asnavant Mt. — Sahend? 
Atropatene = see Adarbaijan 

Bactria KLMbc 

Badghis IKo 

Balkh Mb 

Barfrush Eb 

Behistan (Besitun) Be 

Binalud Kuh Hb 

Birjand Hd 

Boliihara La 

Uaecista (Caecasta) Ab 
Caspian Sea = prob. Vourukasha CDEab 

Cha-kansur IKe 
Chorasmia (see Kb.) 
Chorassan (see Kh.) 

Daitya river = Kizel Uzeu ? BCb 

Darej river = Daryai Ba 

Demavand Mt. DEc 
Dinaver (Diaewer) (not on Map) Be 

Dranjiana IKe 

Ecbatana (Hamadan) Cc 
Elburz (see Alburz) 

El vend = Alvand Ce 

Farab Rud IKde 

Fars (Persis) DEFefg 
Ferghanah (in Turkestan, NE) 

Ganzaca Bb 

Ghazni Nd 

Ghilan Cb 

Ghor Ld 
Ghuznee (see Ghazni) 

Gunabad Hb 

Hamadan (Ecbatana) Cc 

Hamun swamp le 
Hara Berezaiti (see Alburz) 
Hassar (see Hissar) 

Herat Kc 

Hilmend River KLMe 

Hissar MNa 

Hyrcania EFGb 

Ispahan (Isfahan) Dd 
Istakhr = Persepolis (NE of Shiraz) Ef 

Jagatai Mts. Gb 

Jihun (Oxus) River IKab 

Kabul Nc 

Kaian (Kain) Hd 

Kansava = prob. Cha-kansur IKe 
Karman (see Kerman) 

Kashaf River Hb 


lihorasmia El 

Khorassan FGH. 

Kizel Uzen (Sefid, Safed) River B' 

Kub-i Mish Gl 

Kumish GI 

Kunduz N 

Kurdistan ABl 

Lake Urumiah A 

Madan Hi 

Maragba Bl 

Masb-bad HI 

Mazauderan DEb 

Media CDEbc 

Merv 1Kb 
Meshed (see Mash-had) 

Miandasht Gb 

Mihr Gb 

Murghab River Kbc 

Nihavand Cc 

Nisbabur (Nishapur) Hb 

Oxus (Jihuu River) IKab 

Parthia FGbc 

Pasargadae Ee 

Persepolis (NE of Shiraz) Ef 

Persis (Fars) DEFefg 

Radkan Hb 

Ragha (Rai) Do 

Rai Dc 
Safed, Sefid River (Kizel Uzen) BCb 

Sagastan (Seistan) IKLde 

Sahend, Mt. Bb 

Samarkand Ma 

Sari Eb 

Savalan Mt. Ba 

Sehna Be 

Seistan IKLde 

Shiraz Ef 

Shiz (cf. Takht-i Suleiman) Bb 

Sogdiana LMNa 

Spet Razhur Hd 

Susa Cd 

Taberistan Ec 

Tajan River (Thejend) Eb 

Takht-i Bostan Be 

Takht-i Suleiman Bb 

Teheran I)c 
Tojan = ? see Tajan 
Turan = Turkestan 

Turkestan FMab 

Tus Hb 

Urumiah (Urmia) Ab 
Vourukasha = prob. Caspian Sea 

Yazd (Yezd) Fe 

Zen j an Cb 






8vo. Cloth, pp. viii + 310. $4.00, net 


On the meaning of nauta and viator in Horace, Sat. I. Si 11-23. By SIDNEY 
G. ASHMORE. — Anaximander on the Prolongation of Infancy in Man. By 
Nicholas Murray Butler. — Of Two Passages in Euripides' Medea. By 
Mortimer Lamson Earle. — The Preliminary Military Service of the 
Equestrian Cursus Honorum. By JAMES C. EGBERT, Jr. — References to 
Zoroaster in Syriao and Arabic Literature. By RICHARD J. H. GOTTHEIL. — 
Literary Frauds among the Greeks. By ALFRED GUDEMAN. — Henotheism in 
the Rig-Veda. By EDWARD WASHBURN HOPKINS. — On Plato and the Attic 
Comedy. By George B. Hussey. — Herodotus VII. 61, or Ancient Persian 
Armour. By A. V. WILLIAMS jACKSON. — Archaism in Aulus Gellius. By 
Charles Knapp. — On Certain Parallelisms between the Ancient and the 
Modern Drama. BY Brander MATTHEWS. — Ovid's Use of Colour and 
Colour-Terms. By Nelson Glenn McCrea. — A Bronze of Polyclitan 
Affinities in the Metropolitan Museum. By A. C. Merriam. — Geryon 
in Cyprus. By A. C. Merriam. — Hercules, Hydra, and the Crab. By 
A. C. Merriam. — Onomatopoetic Words in Latin. By H. T. PECK. — Notes 
on the Vedio Deity Piisan. By E. D. Perry.— The So-Called Medusa 
Ludovisi. By Julius Sachs. — Aristotle and the Arabs. By William M. 
Sloane. — Iphigenia in Greek and French Tragedy. By Benjamin Duryea 
Woodward. — Gargettus, an Attic Deme. By C. H. YOUNG. 




" Many glimpses of fields almost untrodden in Greek and Latin literature are given in this 
volume." — The New York Tribune. 

" A recent publication which will appeal to every American scholar. . . . The papers arc 
kept strictly within the lines of scholarship and criticism in which Dr. Drisler himself has 
been engaged. On the part of the contributors they are an offering of what is choicest arid 
best in their own profession, a rich and delightful mosaic of American scholarship, which will 
bear study part by part, and which, in the combined setting of the parts, is an incomparable 
tribute to the incomparable Nestor of our American Greek schools." — The Independent. 

** The circumstances of the issue of this handsome volume give it an emotional interest, 
which makes it a volume separate and distinct among the collected records of the investiga- 
tions of scholars. It is a gathering of twenty-one studies of classical problems, printed as a 
tribute to one of the best-known classical students of the present day, at the conclusion of 
fifty years of his service in a single institution. . . . These circumstances give this volume 
an interest to all persons concerned with scholarship and university influences. The studies 
themselves, for the most part, appeal in the first instance to specialists, but many of them 
have a much wider interest. . . . The book is a credit to American scholarship, as well as a 
fit tribute to the honored name of Professor Drisler." — The Outlook. 

" Entirely apart from the special interest which its contents possess for the student of the 
classics, the publication of this handsomely printed volume has some features that are of general 
significance. It gives evidence, for one thing, of the Germanization of our classical scholars, 
not only in their methods of research and the other weightier matters of the law, but also in 
the minor points of academic custom and tradition. In Germany it has long been the practice 
for the friends and former pupils of a distinguished scholar to celebrate some epoch of his 
career by the publication, in his honor, of a collection of scientific monographs relating 
to the special subjects in which his life-work has been spent and his reputation won. . . . 
So far as the writer knows, the work that has just appeared from the new Columbia University 
Press — the first to be issued by that organization — is the only one of the kind yet published 
in honor of an English-speaking scholar. . . . This collection of monographs is particularly 
instructive as practically illustrating the economic principle of the division of labor applied to 
scholarly pursuits. The stock charg. that has been brought against the intense and minute 
specialization of the present day, is that specialists in their devotion, each to his own limited 
field of research, lose their sense of perspective, despise the equally important labors of their 
fellow-specialists, and come to feel that the part is greater than the whole. Such a volume as 
the present affords a practical and ample refutation of that view. Here we see investigators 
in many different fields of study, not only using in their own work the garnered results of 
other specialists, but ably and effectively throwing upon the problems of other workers the 
special knowledge that their own research has enabled them to give. . . . The appearance of 
the volume is unusually attractive and reflects credit upon the Columbia University Press, 
whose work of publication is thus so appropriately and so auspiciously begun." — The Edu- 
cational Review. 



PTOW!I t!!!ttl!»'f'ff!1t!tf!!t'! !!'ft'!'!'ifl!!"1!I!!ri'''''''^^