Skip to main content

Full text of "The aurora borealis"

See other formats

mm: ^ 

I 'l 1 





Henrs W. Sage 


AZl/AM 44^ 

Cornell University Library 


The aurora borealis. 

3 1924 031 238 441 

W ^ Cornell University 
WB Library 

The original of tliis book is in 
tine Cornell University Library. 

There are no known copyright restrictions in 
the United States on the use of the text. 




Eaoh book complete in One Volume, 12mo, and tionnd in Cloth. 


CIEES. By J. Ttndall, LL. D., F. E. S. With 35 Ulnstrations. $1.50. 

2. PHYSICS AND POLITICS ; or, Thoughts on the Application of the Prin- 

ciples of "Natural Selection" and "Inheritance" to Political Society. 
By Waltbb Baobhot. $1.50. 
8. FOODS. By Edwabd Smith, M.D., LL.B., F. E. S. With numerous Elus- 
trations. $1.75. 

4. MIND AND BODY : The Theories of their Eelation. By Albxandeb Bain, 

LL.D. With 4 Dlustrations. $1.50. 

5. THE STUDY OF SOCIOLOGY. By Heebeet Spenobb. $1.50. 

6. THE NEW CHEMISTEY. By Professor J. P. Cookb, Harvard University. 

With 31 Illustrations. $2.00. 

7. THE CONSEEVATION OF ENEEGY. By Baleoub Stbtvaet, M.A., 

LL. D„ P. E. S. With 14 Illustrations. $1.50. 

8. ANIMAL LOCOMOTION ; or. Walking, Swimming, and Flying. By J. B. 

Pettiqeew, M. D., F. E. S., etc. With 130 Illustrations. $1.75. 



10. THE SCIENCE OP LAW. By Professor Sheldon Amos. $1.75. 

11. ANIMAL MECHANISM : A Treatise on Terrestrial and Aerial Locomotion. 

By Professor E. J. Maebt, College of France. With 117 Illnstrations. $1.75. 


ENCE. By J. W. Dbapee, M.D., LL.D. $1.75. 


Schmidt, Strasburg University. With 26 Illustrations. $1.50. 


VoGBL, Eoyal Industrial Academy of Berlin. With 100 Illustrations. $2.00. 

15. FUNGI : Their Nature and Uses. By M. C. Cooke, M. A., LL. D. Edited by 

the Eev. M. J. Berkeley, M. A., P. L. S. With 109 Illustrations. $1.50. 


DwiGHT Whitney, Yale College. $1 50. 


Jevons, M. a., p. E. S. $1.75. 

18. THE NATUEE OP LIGHT, with a General Account of Physical Optics. By 

Dr. Eugene Lommbl. With 188 Dlustrations and » Table of Spectra in 
Colors. $2.00. 

The Interruttional Scientific Series. — (Continued.) 


EDBN, University of Louvain. With 83 Illustrations. $1.50. 

20. FERMENTATION. By Professor P. SohStzekbekgee. With 28 Ulustra- 

tions. $1.50. 

21. THE FIVE SENSES OF MAN. By Professor Jniins Beenbtein, Univer- 

sity of Halle. With 91 Illustrations. $1.75. 


fessor PiBTKO Blaserha, Royal University of Rome. With numerous 
Illustrations. $1.50. 

23. STUDIES IN SPECTRUM ANALYSIS. By J. Noemas Locktee, F. R. S. 

With 7 Photographic Dlnstrations of Spectra, and 52 other Illustratione. 


fessor R. H. Thueston, Cornell University. With 163 Illustrations. $2.50. 

25. EDUCATION AS A SCIENCE. By Aiexandeb Bain, LL. D. $1.75. 

26. STUDENTS' TEXT-BOOK OF COLOR ; or. Modem Chromatics. With 

Applications to Art and Industry. By Professor Ogden N. Rood, Colum- 
bia College. With 130 Dlustrations. $2.00. 

27. THE HUMAN SPECIES. By Professor A. de Quatkefagbs, Museum of 

Natural History, Paris. $2.00. 

28. THE CRAYFISH : An Introduction to the Study of ZoOlogy. By T. H. 

Huxley, F. R. S. With 82 Llustratious. $1.75. 

29. THE ATOMIC THEORY. By Professor A. Wuetz. Translated by E. 

Cleminshaw, F. C. S. With Elustrative Chart. $1.50. 


EXISTENCE. By Professor Kaei Sempee, University of Wflrzburg. 
With 106 Dlustrations and 3 Maps. $2.00. 

31. SIGHT : An Exposition of the Principles of Monocular and Binocular Vision. 

By Professor Joseph Lb Cohtb, LL. D., University of California. With 
132niustrations. $1.50. 


I. Rosenthal, University of Erlangen. With 75 Illustrations. $1.50. 

33. ILLUSIONS : A Psychological Study. By James Sullt. $1.50. 

at THE SUN. By Professor C. A. Yodkg, College of New Jersey. With 83 
Dlustrations. $2.00. 

35. VOLCANOES ; What they Are and What they Teach. By Professor John 

W. JxTDD, F. R S., Royal School of Mines. With 96 Dlustrations. $2.00. 

36. SUICIDE : An Essay in Comparative Moral Statistics. By Professor Henet 

MoESBLLI, M. D., Royal University, Turin. With 4 Statistical Maps. 

TION OP WORMS. With Observations on their Habits. By Chaeles 
Daewest, LL.D., P. R.S. With 15 Illustrations. $1.50. 

The International Scientific 5«ries.— (Continued.) 3 

Stallo. $1.75. 

39. THE BRAIN AND ITS FUNCTIONS. By J. Lcrs, Hospice Salpgtri^re, 

Paris. With 6 Illustrations. $1.B0. 

40. MYTH AND SCIENCE. By Tito Visnoli. $1.50. 

41. DISEASES OF MEMORY : An Essay in the Positive Psychology. By Th. 

RrBOT, author of " Heredity." $1.60. 

42. ANTS, BEES, AND WASPS. A Record of Observations of the Habits of 

the Social Hymenoptera. By Sir John Lubbock, Bart., F. R. S., etc. $2.00. 

43. THE SCIENCE OF POLITICS. By Professor Sheldon Amos. $1.75. 

44. ANIMAL INTELLIGENCE. By Geoege J. Romanes, M. D., P. R. S. $1.75. 

45. MAN BEFORE METALS. By Professor N. Jolt, Science Faculty of Tou- 

louse. With 148 DluBtrations. $1.75. 


METER, University of Zflrich. With 47 Illustrations. $1.75. 

47. FALLACIES : A View of Logic from the Practical Side. By Aleked 

SiDaincK, B. A., Oxon. $1.75. 

48. ORIGIN OF CULTIVATED PLANTS. By Alphokbe de Cakdollb. $2.00. 


tive Nervous Systems. By George J. Romanes, M. D., P. R. S. With 63 
Illustrations. $1.75. 


don Clieeokd. With 100 Figures. $1.50. 

51. PHYSICAL EXPRESSION : Its Modes and Principles. By Francis War- 

ner, M.D., Assistant Physician, London Hospital. With 51 Illustrations. 

52. ANTHROPOID APES. By Professor Robert Habtmann, University of 

BerUn. With 63 niustrations. $1.75. 


Professor Oscar Schmidt, University of Strasburg. With 51 Illustrations. 

54. COMPARATIVE LITERATURE. By Professor H. M. Posnbtt, M. A., Uni- 

versity College, Auckland. $1.75. 


Milne, Imperial College of Engineering, Tokio. With 38 Figures. $1.75. 

56. MICROBES, FERMENTS, AND MOULDS. By E. L. Teocessart. With 

107 Illustrations. $1.50. 


MALS. By Professor Angblo Heilprin, Academy of Natural Sciences, 
Philadelphia. $2.00. 

58. WEATHER. A Popular Exposition of the Nature of Weather Changes from 

Day to Day. With 96 Diagrams. By Hon. Ralph Aberorombt. $1.75. 

The Internaiional Saentlfic <Sm6!.— (Continued ) 

69. ANIMAL MAGNETISM. By AxrRED Binet and Chaelbs Fisfi, Assistant 
Physician, Hospice SalpStriere, Paris. With 15 Figures. $1.50. 

60. INTEENATIONAL LAW, with Materials for a Code of International Law. 

By Professor Leone Levi, King's College, London. $1.50. 

61. THE GEOLOGICAL HISTOET OF PLANTS. With 79 Hlustrations. By 

Sir J. William Dawson, LL. D., F. E. S. $1.75. 
63. ANTHEOPOLOGT. An Introduction to the Study of Man and Civilization. 
By Edwabd B. Ttlob, D. C. L., E. E. S. With 78 Illustrations. $2.00. 


OTHEE AGENCIES. By the Eev. Geokqe Henslow, M.A., etc. With 
88 Illustrations. $1.75. 


P.E.S., etc. With 118 Illustrations. $1.75. 


By Dr. C. N. Staboke, University of Copenhagen. $1.75. 

66. PHYSIOLOGY OF BODILY EXEECISE. By F. Lageanqe, M.D. $1.75. 

67. THE COLOES OF ANIMALS : Their Meaning and Use. By Edward 

Bagnall Poulton, F. E. S. With 36 Blustrations and 1 Colored Plate. 

68. SOCIALISM : New and Old. By Professor William Geaham, M. A., Queen's 

College, Belfast. $1.75. 

69. MAN AND THE GLACIAL PEEIOD. By Professor G. Fbbdbkiok Weight, 

D. D., Oberlin Theological Seminary. With 108 Illustrations and 3 Maps. 


Maunde Thompson, D. C. L., etc. $3.00. 

71. A HISTOEY OF CEUSTACEA. Eecent Malacostraca. By the Eev. 

Thomas E. E. Stebbinq, M. A. With 51 Illustrations. $3.00. 
73. RACE AND LANGUAGE. By Professor AuDKfi Lepbveb, Anthropological 
School, Paris. $1.50. 

73. MOVEMENT. By E. J. Maebt. Translated hy Eric Peitchaed, M. A., 

M. B., B. Ch. (Oxon.). With 200 Ulustrations. $1.75. 

74. ICE-WOEK, PEESENT AND PAST. By T. G. Bonnet, D. Sc, F. E. S., 

F. S. A., etc., Professor of Geology at University College, London. $1.50. 

75. WHAT IS ELECTEICITY ? By John Teowbeidge, S. D., Eumford Pro- 

fessor and Lecturer on the Applications of Science to the Useful Arts, Har- 
vard University. Illustrated. $1.50, 


D.C.L., M.A., etc. $1.75. 

New York ; D. APFLETON & CO., Y2 Fifth Avenue. 















Authorized Edition. 


The first work, devoted entirely to the study of Polar 
Auroras, was written in France ; it is entitled ' Traite 
Physique et Historique de 1' Aurora Boreale,' and was 
published in 1733 by De Mairan, in the 'Memoires' 
of the ' Academie des Sciences.' We must allow a cen- 
tury to elapse before we find anything to be compared 
with it in importance and volume, when the work 
' Aurores Boreales ' appeared in the collection of the 
voyages of the Northern Scientific Commission on the 
corvette * Eecherche.' This volume, accompanied by 
magnificent plates — of which we shall reproduce the 
most interesting — contains records of observations of 
the aurora boreaHs taken in Lapland during the 
winter of 1838-39 by Bravais, Lottin, Lillihoeoek, and 
Siljestroem. Bravais added general remarks on this 
phenomenon, and discussed the principal observations 
collected at that date, and the various hypotheses put 
forward to account for them. 


Since then no general work on the subject has 
appeared in this country. The student was obliged 
to consult original papers published in all languages, 
or foreign treatises, among which we will men- 
tion only one as the most complete, that of Her- 
mann Fritz of Zurich, ' Das Polarlicht ' (Leipzig, 

I have tried to meet this want by writing in the 
journal ' LaLumiere Electrique ' (vol. vii., last half of 
1882) a series of ten articles on the Polar Aurora, 
accompanied by numerous plates, which reproduce 
from the original documents the principal appearances 
of the polar aurora. These articles, revised according 
to the most recent discoveries, have served as the 
basis of the present work. 

It would have been easy to increase considerably 
the size of this volume by citing a greater number 
of the results of observations. I thought, however, 
that it was better to choose for each class of phenomena 
two or three of the most conclusive examples, borrowed 
from those observers who are most worthy of con- 
fidence. I have not tried to publish all the obser- 
vations collected at all times and in all countries on 
Polar Auroras. I have rather sought to give a sketch 
of the actual state of our knowledge of this question, 
noting the results which may be considered as defi- 


nitely acquired, and also the points on which further 
research seems unnecessary. 

I have indicated in the course of the work the 
most important books and papers on each branch of 
the subject ; but here, also, some limit was necessary. 
For these works must now be reckoned by hundreds, 
some containing merely observations of the aurora, 
others theories about it. A complete bibliography 
of the subject would alone fill a large volume. 

The figures in the text are reproduced directly, and 
as exactly as possible, from the original documents, 
and their source is always indicated. They are taken 
partly from the fine atlas of Bravais, which contains the 
most beautiful engravings of the aurora borealis which 
have yet been published. I have been able to add draw- 
ings which are less known, and some never before 
published. In particular, my thanks are due to M. de 
la Monneraye, a lieutenant in the navy, who kindly 
placed at my disposition a remarkable series of draw- 
ings which he executed himself in the course of a 
sojourn in the seas near Newfoundland. 

In the Appendix will be found a list of all the 
appearances of the aurora borealis. observed from 1700 
to 1890 in Europe below the 55th parallel of latitude. 
Above this Hmit auroras are so frequent that at cer- 
tain epochs they may be seen almost every day. In 


drawing up this catalogue I have chiefly followed that 
of Fritz, which is a summary of all previous cata- 
logues. I have only had to add the observations of 
the last twenty years. Such catalogues are indis- 
pensable for almost all the studies which relate to 
Polar Auroras ; and since Mairan's, in the middle of the 
last century, none had been published in France. The 
service which this catalogue may render will, I hope, 
excuse its length and aridity. 





1. Faint lights without definite form .... 13 

2. Lights in the form of clouds. Auroral bands and 

patches 14 

3. Homogeneous arcs 20 

4. Non-homogeneous, or rayed arcs . . . . 22 

5. Auroral rays and crowns 28 

6. Draped auroras 82 

III. Phtsioaii Chaeaoteks of the Polab Auboba . . 34 

1. Colour of the aurora 34 

l^ 2. Intensity of the light of the aurora ... 37 

'■■ 3. Nature of the light of the aurora . . . . 40 

4. Sound of the aurora 46 

" 0. Odour of the aurora 51 

IV. Extent, Position, and Fbequency or the Aueoea . 52 

1. Extent of the aurora 52 

2. Height of the aurora 56 

3. Frequency of the aurora 69 

4. Direction in which the aurora is seen ... 74 


1. Diurnal period 79 



2. Annual period 84 

3. Secular periods. Eelations of the aurora with the 

solar spots 91 

VI. Eelations op the Aoeoea with Meteoeolooical 

Phenomena 104 

1. With the weather 104 

2. With the clouds 108 

3. With atmospheric electricity 113 

VII. Eelations of the Aueoea with Teeeestbial Mas- 


1. With the general distribution of terrestrial mag- 

netism 120 

2. With magnetic disturbance 128 

3. With telluric currents 138 

VIII. Theoeies of the Aueoea 147 

1. Cosmic theories 147 

2. Optical theories 151 

3. Magnetic theories 154 

4. Electrical theories 158 

Appendix : Catalogue of the auroras observed in Europe below the 
65th parallel of latitude from 1700 to 1890. 




1. BossEKOP (Lapland) Aubora with Arc and Drapery Frontispiece 

2. Wlntebinq OF THE ' Vega.' Elliptical Arcs . To face p. 21 

3. WmiERiNO OF THE ' Vega.' Ellipiical Arcs . „ 21 

4. WiNTEBma OF the ' Vega.' Multiple Arcs . „ 22 


with Different Centres .... „ 22 

6. BossEKOP. Successive Appearances of the same 

Aurora „ 23 

7. Paris. Bated Arc „ 25 

8. Bay of Islands, Newfoundland. Bayed Aurora „ 29 

9. Bay of Islands. Eayed Aurora .... „ 29 

10. Bay of Islands. Eastern Half op a Corona 

borealis „ 31 

11. Bay of Islands. Western Half of a Corona 

borealis „ 30 

12. BosSEKOP. Draped Aurora . . . . „ 33 

13. BossEKOP. Draped Aurora ... • » 34 



14. BossEKOP. Dkaped AnEOKA WITH Hook . . To face p. 35 

15. Melboubke. Aurora with Abcs aud Corona 

austealis „ 36 

18. Paeis. Draped Adboka ..... .. 40 

illusteations in text 


16. Chart of the Phequenot of the Auboba Boebaus . . 133 


Spots on the Sun iJ7 




Polar auroras, which are subdivided into aurora 
borealis and aurora australis, according to the hemi- 
sphere in which they occur, are assuredly the finest 
of the optical phenomena of nature, but are, even at 
the present day, one of the least understood. While 
by their sudden appearance, their superb colouring, 
their rapid movement, their infinitely varied form, 
the northern lights have from all time excited the 
attention of the multitude, their mysterious nature 
and the relations which seem to connect them with 
terrestrial magnetism, and even with certain cosmic 
phenomena, such as the spots in the sun, make 
them the subject of the study of meteorologists and 

The aurora borealis was already known to the 
Greeks and Eomans, although it is a rare pheno- 
menon in districts so far south as the shores of the 


Mediterranean. Aristotle touches on tbem briefly 
in his ' Meteorology.' ' He says that they sometimes 
present the appearance of the smoke of the straw 
which is burnt in the country, and his observation is 
exact. - Other forms of the aurora borealis are 
designated by him under the name of brands (BaXol) 
and goats (alyss ) : the author enters into no explana- 
tion, but this last name may plausibly be referred 
to certain luminous rays, of which we shall speak 
later, which show rapid alternative movements in the 
direction of their length, and thus appear to leap. 
Further on, among the phenomena which may be ob- 
served on calm nights, Aristotle enumerates gulfs 
and abysses {■^da-fiaTa, ^oOvvoi) and sanguine colours. 
The first two expressions doubtless refer to what is 
now known as the obscure segment, the dark part of 
the heaven which is seen in the form of an arc, below 
the aurora. This identification appears the more 
probable that Aristotle adds : ' The gulfs seem to have 
a certain depth because of the contrast which the light 
makes with the black and blue colour of the sky. 
Often even, when they contract, brands or torches 
issue from them {haXol in Greek) ; the gulf then 
seems to converge.' These few lines appear to be 
absolutely incomprehensible in certain French trans- 
lations ; as rendered above they correspond with 
sufficient accuracy to certain aspects of the aurora 

' Lib. i. 4 and 5. 


Cicero merely mentions twice the aurora, which 
he indicates by the term torches.^ 

Pliny, the naturalist, is much more explicit,^ and 
he cites the precise epochs at which the phenomenon 
was observed. 

' Beams (trabes) are seen to shine in the heaven, 
which are called Bo/col in Greek, as it happened at 
the time when the Lacedaemonians, vanquished at sea, 
lost the dominion over Greece. In the sky appears a 
gulf which is called chasma (the Greek word trans- 
lated directly into Latin). And, besides, there is seen 
in the heaven (and nothing is more terrible for 
trembling mortals) blood-coloured flames which 
afterwards fall upon the earth, as it happened in the 
third year of the hundred and seventh Olympiad, 
when King Philip ruled over Greece. Under the 
consulate of C. Csecilius and Cn. Papirius, and on 
many other occasions, a light was seen in heaven 
which made the night almost as light as day. It is 
said that at the time of the wars of the Cimbri, and 
also often before and since, the clashing of arms and 
the sound of trumpets were heard in the sky. But in 
the third consulate of Marius the dwellers in Ameria 
and Tuderta saw in the heavens two armies rushing 
one against the other from the east and from the 
west ; that of the west was defeated. The heaven 

' De Natura Deorum, ii. 5 : ' turn faoibug visis cselestibus ; ' 
Catilm. III. viii. : ' -visas nooturno tempore ab oocidente faces 
ardoremque cseli.' 

2 Hist. Nat. ii. 26, 27, 33, and 57. 


itself caught fire : this is no extraordinary thing, and 
it has often been seen when the clouds are exposed 
to great heat.' ' 

In this quotation from Pliny we find for the first 
time the trace of that popular superstition which 
obtained almost down to our own day, and which 
attributed the great auroras to armies combating in 
the sky. 

Seneca ' gives a few more details, curiously exact, 
showing that observers in classic times were often 
more accurate than those of several centuries later. 
Speaking of the different sorts of heavenly fires, 
Seneca describes a certain number of appearances 
which are clearly the aurora borealis ; but instead^ of 
using Latin words to describe them he borrows the 
Greek terms of Aristotle, which we gave above. Here 
is the passage from Seneca : — 

' Sometimes flames are seen in the sky, either 
stationary or full of movement. Several kinds are 
known : the abysses, when beneath a luminous crown 
the heavenly fire is wanting, forming as it were the 
circular entrance to a cavern; the tuns (pithitce), 
when a great rounded flame in the form of a barrel is 
seen to move from place to place, or to burn immo- 
vable the gulfs (cJiasmata), when the heaven seems 
to open and to vomit flames which before were hidden 
in its depths. These fires present the most varied 
colours : some are a vivid red ; others resemble a faint 

' Naturales Qucestiones, i. 14, 15. 


and dying flame ; some are white ; others scintillate ; 
others finally are of an even yellow, and emit neither 
raya nor projections. Among these phenomena 
should be ranged those appearances as of the heavens 
on fire so often reported by historians ; sometimes 
these fires are high enough to shine among the stars ; 
at others, so low that they might be taken for the re- 
flection of a distant burning homestead or city. This 
is what happened under Tiberius, when the cohorts 
hurried to the succour of the colony of Ostia, believ- 
ing it to be on fire. During the greater part of the 
night the heaven appeared to be illuminated by a 
faint light resembling a thick smoke.' 

The mistake mentioned by Seneca is so natural 
that it has often occurred since. At Copenhagen, 
in 1709, during a large and brilliant aurora, several 
battalions turned out under arms and beating drums. 

The Greek and Eoman authors often confounded 
certain faint auroras with comets, and it is probable 
that the catalogues of early appearances of comets 
contain many errors of this description. The mis- 
take is manifest when it is stated in the description 
that the comet appeared in the north and only 
lasted a few hours, or even less ; in this case it was 
simply a ray of the aurora borealis. Such, for instance, 
was the supposed comet of October 11, 1527, in France, 
in Germany, and almost the whole of Europe : it was 
of immense length ; its summit was like an arm, bent 
at the elbow ; it was only visible towards the north. 


and lasted but an hour and a quarter. It was of an 
orange-red colour, ' and joined to it were dark rays 
in the form of tails, lances, bloody swords, figures 
of men, and heads cut off, bristling with hair and 
beards.' From all these details it is easy to recognise 
in the phenomenon an aurora borealis. 

Among early records of the aurora we will 
cite yet another, mentioned by Gregory of Tours. 
He says he saw the appearance himself, and his 
description is interesting; both from its simplicity 
and accuracy, and because the form now known as 
the ' boreal crown ' is clearly indicated for the first 
time : ' Two nights in succession we saw signs in the 
heavens, that is to say rays of light which rose in 
the north, as often happens. A great light took 
possession of a part of the sky and seemed to over- 
flow it. • . . There was in the middle of the heaven 
a cloud of light, towards which all the rays converged, 
in the form of a tent of which the sides, much wider 
at the foot, ascended, narrowing to the summit, where 
they united, often in the shape of a hood.' ' 

Gregory of Tours in several other places mentions 
the aurora borealis, and his descriptions are always 
equally simple : he considers the aurora as a curious 
manifestation, but attaches to it no idea of the 
supernatural. Some centuries later astrology had so 
troubled the minds of men that the aurora borealis 
had become a source of terror : bloody lances, heads 

' Eistoria Francorum, viii. 17. 


separated from the trunk, armies in conflict, were 
clearly distinguished. At the sight of them people 
fainted (according to Cornelius Gemma), others went 
mad. Pilgrimages were organised to avert the wrath 
of Heaven, manifested by these terrible signs. Thus, 
according to the Journal of Henri III., in the month 
of September 1583 eight or nine hundred persons of 
all ages and both sexes, with their lords, came to 
Paris in procession, dressed hke penitents or pilgrims, 
from the villages of Deux-Gemeaux and Ussy -en-Brie, 
near La Ferte-Gaucher, ' to say their prayers and 
make their offerings in the great church at Paris ; 
and they said that they were moved to this penitential 
journey because of signs seen in heaven and fires in the 
air, even towards the quarter of the Ardennes, whence 
had come the first such penitents, to the number of 
ten or twelve thousand, to Our Lady of Eheims and 
to Liesse.' The chronicler adds that this pUgrim'age 
was followed a few days afterwards by five others, and 
for the same cause. 

These superstitious terrors lasted at least till the 
end of the seventeenth century. La Mothe le Vayer, 
who was tutor to the Duke of Orleans, brother of 
Louis XIV., and afterwards to Louis XIV. himself, 
and who entered the Academy in 1639, alludes to 
these popular beliefs in his 78th letter, entitled 'De la 
Credulite : ' ' I will take my second example (of 
credulity) from the writings of Baptiste le Grain, for 
whom I have a great esteem : he says in his sixth 


book that he observed in Paris in 1615, about eight 
o'clock in the evening of the 26th of October, men of 
fire in heaven, who fought with lances, and who by 
this terrifying spectacle foretold the fury of the wars 
which followed. Yet I was with him in the same 
town, and I protest, having studied attentively until 
eleven at night the phenomenon of which he speaks, 
that I saw nothing similar to his description, but 
only an appearance which is sufficiently common, in 
the form of pavilions in the sky flaming up and 
fading out again, as is usual with such meteors. A 
number of persons now living will testify to what I 

It was towards this epoch that, as a result of the 
observations of Gassendi, and later of those of Cassini, 
of Eoemer, &c., the aurora ceased to be regarded, at 
any rate by the educated classes, as a supernatural 
phenomenon, presaging horrible calamities. Yet even 
at the present day, in rural districts, simple folk might 
be prone to attribute a supernatural origin or signifi- 
cance to the aurora if its appearance should chance 
to coincide with striking events or great disasters. 
Perhaps some vestiges of this ancient superstition 
might have been found at the time of the remark- 
able aurora borealis which was observed through- 
out France during the nights of October 24 and 25, 

The Norsemen believed that the aurora represented 
the Valkyries riding through the air on their sombre 


horses. This belief, indicated by Tacitus in his de- 
scription of Germany, is given more explicitly in 
several passages of the Edda. But since this 
phenomenon is of common occurrence in the north, 
familiarity early deprived it of all its terrors. About 
the year 1250, less than a century after the composi- 
tion of the Edda, a Norwegian, who probably lived 
near the town of Nansos (to the north of Trondhiem), 
wrote a work, at once philosophical and political, 
entitled 'The King's Mirror' (Konungs Skitggsja), 
which is remarkable on more than one count : in 
it the aurora is thus described : • — 

•The. nature and constitution of the northern 
lights are such that the darker the night the brighter 
they shine : they are never seen by day, but only at 
night, especially in profound obscurity, and rarely by 
moonUght. They appear like a great flame seen from 
a distance, as though that of a vast fire. From the 
smoke of it pointed shafts of unequal and very vari- 
able size seem to dart upwards into the air, so that 
now the one and now the other is the higher, and 
they seem to quiver like flames. When these rays 
are at their highest and brightest they give so much 
light that one can find one's way about quite easily 
out of doors, and even hunt if this is desired. In 
houses with windows it is Ught enough within for men 
to see each other's faces. This Ught is so variable 

' Sophus Tromholt, Zur OescUchte des Nordlichts (Meteoro- 
logische ZMschrift, vol. ii. 1885, p. 24). 


that it sometimes becomes obscured, as though it were 
covered by thick smoke or cloud ; and soon it seems 
to be stifled by this smoke and near extinct. But as 
soon as the cloud begins to dissipate and grow less 
thick, the light increases and glows again, and some- 
times great sparks seem to fly from it, as from a red- 
hot iron taken from the forge. As the night advances 
and dawn approaches, this light begins to pale, and it 
fades altogether when day breaks. Certain people 
maintain that this light is a reflection of the fire 
which surrounds the seas of the north and of the 
south ; others say that it is the reflection of the sun 
when it is below the horizon ; for my part. I think 
that it is produced by the ice which radiates at night 
the light which it has absorbed by day.' 

Note, by the way, this first attempt at an explana- 
tion of the polar auroras. Doubtless it is not very 
convincing and would not be considered satisfactory 
at the present day ; but we must not smile at it, since 
it is nearly the same as that which many centuries 
later was suggested both by Descartes and Sir John 

We may add, in concluding this historical sketch, 
that Gassendi, in 1621, first used the term aurora 
borealis. In the seventeenth century and even in a 
part of the eighteenth, as this appearance was not 
known to exist in the southern hemisphere, the light - 
was called borealis when it appeared in the northern 
quarter of the sky, and australis when it appeared to 


the south, but always to an observer in the northern 

Although polar auroras were seen in Chili as early 
as 1640, the first certain observations taken in the 
southern hemisphere and known in Europe were those 
of Antonio de Ulloa. During the voyage round Cape 
Horn in 1745 he more than once had occasion to 
observe a polar aurora, and he maintains that they 
must be as frequent in the southern hemisphere as in 
our own. Since then the name of aurora borealis has 
been restricted to those which are seen in the northern 
hemisphere, round the north pole, and that of aurora 
australis to those which are seen round the south 
pole. The name polar aurora, therefore, is to be 
preferred as being more general. 

In England and the United States the name 
proposed by Gassendi has been adopted in scientific 
phraseology to designate this phenomenon. The 
sailors of the north of England call them northern 
lights, or streamers. In Germany and Scandinavian 
countries the ancient name of northern light which 
we find in 'The King's Mirror' has been retained, 
Nordlicht in German, Nordljus in Swedish, Nordlys in 




The polar aurora offers the most varied and complex 
forms, as the reader can judge from the illustrations 
in this work, which reproduce as faithfully as possible 
the original drawings made by competent observers 
in presence of the phenomenon. The source of each 
engraving is always indicated, thus facilitating the 
reference to the original descriptions. 

We shall divide the polar auroras into two great 
classes : those which are apparently motionless, or at 
least of which the various parts retain for a certain 
time their relative position and intensity ; and those 
which, on the other hand, present rapid and incessant 
variations in shape and brilliancy. In the first class 
we distinguish three principal forms : 

1. Paint lights without very defined form. 

2. More distinct lights, grouped in patches which 
often present the appearance of clouds. 

3. Clearly defined arcs, formed of a homogeneous 
luminous mass touching the horizon at either ex- 

In the second class, that of auroras presenting 


rapid movements, three principal subdivisions are also 

4. Non-homogeneous arcs, of which the brilliancy 
is not uniform, nor the border regular ; from these 
arcs rays shoot upward intermittently. 

5. Eays isolated from each other, at a greater or 
less distance: they seem to converge upon a fixed 
point in the sky, and sometimes form round this point 
a sort of glory or crown. 

6. Non-homogeneous bands, formed of rays pressed 
close together which have not aU the same degree of 
brilliancy. These bands of light have a height pro- 
portioned to their width : sometimes they seem to 
fold over on themselves, and then they become the 
draped auroras, which are the most beautiful mani- 
festations of the polar aurora. 

These different forms, which we separate for 
purposes of description, and which, moreover, are most 
often seen singly, may yet exist simultaneously or 
successively in the same aurora, as we shall see in the 
examples given in the course of this study. 

1. Faint lights without very definite form. — There 
is not very much to say about these faint and ill- 
defined lights, which constitute the first type of polar 
auroras. They are of the most varied dimensions, 
sometimes very small, sometimes occupying almost 
the whole heaven: their brilliancy is at times not 
greater than that of the Milky Way ; they then form, 
as it were, a white veil over the sky. At other times 


they only feebly light up the horizon, and it ia 
probable that under this form .they often pass un- 
observed, either because they are masked by a stronger 
light, such as that of the moon, or by that reflected 
in the sky by the illumination of great, towns, or 
because they are taken for the last rays of the sunset 
or the first of the dawn. At times, again, when their 
light is somewhat stronger, they appear on the 
horizon as the reflection of a distant fire, illuminating 
the edges of the dark clouds which interpose between 
them and the spectator. Finally — but this is rare — the 
focus of these hghts may be, not on the horizon, but 
at some distance above it, though the elevation is 
never many degrees. 

Faint auroras of this class are often called Licht- 
frocess by German authors : they appear to be of 
frequent occurrence in Europe, but they escape the 
attention of all but careful observers whose attention 
is specially directed to this phenomenon. 

It is perhaps with this species of polar aurora 
that we should connect the sort of phosphorescence 
which on certain nights illumines the whole atmo- 
sphere. Such a light was observed at Gottingen 
during the night of November 13 and 14, 1866, when, 
without apparent cause, the sky remained as light as 
it is usually in the shortest summer nights. 

2. Lights in the form of clouds. Auroral bands 
and patches. — The greater number of auroras which 
have been observed in France belong to this class. 


They are vague lights withont very defined outline, of 
which the colour is generally a yellowish or greenish 
white, more rarely a beautiful rose colour. They 
afifect, for instance, the form of clouds of smoke, like 
the aurora which was observed and drawn in Febru- 
ary 1874, by the expedition under Payer and Wey- 
precht on board the 'Tegetthof at Franz Josef 
Land. Still more often they resemble those light 
clouds, like feathers or tufts of carded cotton, known 
to meteorologists as cirrus. 

This species of aurora is often seen alone, or it 
may mark the beginning and the end of more com- 
plete auroras. 

The resemblance between some of these auroras 
and cirrus clouds may be so close that it becomes 
sometimes impossible to distinguish whether we are 
really gazing on a manifestation of the northern 
lights or on true clouds lit up by some reflected light. 
We quote textualJy, by way of instance, from the 
notes taken by Br avals at Bossekop • on October 1, 
1838, during an observation of an aurora borealis. 

' 11.45. To the north north-west a yellowish light 
in the form of a flattened arc. Is it a cirro-stratus 
or an arc? 

' 11.57. The flattened arc seen at 11.45 is 
decidedly a cirro-stratus. 

' Voyages of the Soientifio Commission of the North in Scandi- 
navia, Lapland, Spitzbergen, and the Faroe Islands during the years 
1838, 1839, and 1840 on the BechercM. 


' 12.15. The cirro-stratus in the north north-west 
still simulates the arc of an aurora. 

' 1.45. Its form is now clearly defined : the series 
of cirrus which compose it are nearly parallel, con- 
verging like the rays of an aurora. 

•2.0. The great cirro-stratus, passing from the 
north-west to the south-west, has sent towards the 
zenith a good number of scattered cirri : these seem 
(if I rightly distinguish these cirrus clouds from the 
lights of the aurora) to obey the force which directs 
the rays of the aurora.' 

The analogy of these forms of the aurora with 
certain clouds is, then, so great that a skilled observer 
like Bravais hesitates to pronounce upon them, and, 
after declaring at one moment that they are really 
clouds that he sees, ends by questioning whether he 
clearly distinguishes these clouds from the aurora 

The coexistence of these cirrus clouds, with the 
discs or bands of the aurora has, moreover, been 
frequently observed. It is well known that the cirrus 
is formed of little needles of ice, which, refracting 
the light of the sun or moon, produce the optical 
phenomena known as halos, parhelia, &c. Now on 
November 2, 1838, one of Bravais' companions, Lillie- 
hoeoeck, observed around the moon, during an aurora 
borealis, the ordinary halo of twenty-two degrees of 
radius. ' There is,' he says, ' an intimate relation 
between the light of the halo a,nd that of the aurora, 


for -where a ray of the latter cuts the halo the ray 
becomes wider and its light appears more condensed.' 
We shall' see later the important bearing of observa- 
tions of this nature on the theory of polar auroras. 

It would be easy to multiply similar quotations, 
and to show that, not only is it possible to confound 
the aurora with cirrus, but that the two phenomena 
are frequently mingled. In the twihght of the dawn 
cloudy bands have been seen to take the place of the 
bands of the aurora. At other times arched clouds exist 
in the sky before nightfall, and it is the aurora, on the 
contrary, which seems to take their place. The two 
phenomena may succeed each other or coexist, and 
it then seems probable that the auroral light allied 
during the night with the cirrus persists with it in 
the daytime, although it is no longer possible to dis- 
tinguish its proper light. 

The auroral patches and bands often exhibit curious 
variations in brilliancy, and these have been named 
by Bravais palpitating lights. We wUl borrow as an 
example the following details from Bravais' observa- 
tion of October 22, 1838 : ' These are patches of a faint 
yellow colour, into the centre of which is injected 
from time to time a brilliant light of a more vivid 
colour, which lasts but an instant. The patches seem 
subject to alternate expansion and contraction, which 
may be compared to the movement of medusae swim- 
ming in the sea. It is a curious fact that the different 
patches of light which occupy different parts of the 


sky undergo simultaneously this alternative move- 
ment. To the dilatation is added at the same time an 
increase in the intensity of the light. Independently 
of this alternative movement the patches undergo a 
change in form and intensity which is much slower, 
and does not appear to be periodic. The peristaltic 
movement generally consists of one or two sharp 
beats, lasting half a second or so, after which there 
is a pause of a few seconds, and the beats begin 
again. Some of the patches are doubled in extent 
and in brilliancy relatively to their contracted 

The causes to which this palpitation of the light is 
due may persist for several days. Instead of all the 
auroral patches of light obeying the same alternative 
movement, these patches may form part of two series, 
of which the one palpitates, while the other is com- 
pletely free from movement. The spots of light in 
the two series may be so similar, and so much mingled 
together, that the eye of the observer cannot, during 
the period of repose, distinguish them the one from 
the other ; they may perhaps, however, belong to two 
different planes. 

Sometimes, finally, the obscure phase amounts to 
total extinction, and as the patches, on reappearing, 
have not always retained their original position, they 
resemble ' the clouds of smoke poured forth by a 
distant locomotive ' (Bravais). 

A cuiious phenomenon, mentioned by Hildebrand- 


son/ director of the observatory at Upsala, may be 
connected with this second type of auroras. On July 
25, 1877, on the south of Lake Wetter, two ob- 
servers remarked, between two storms which succeeded 
each other at an interval of three hours, less than 
two yards above the surface of an arm of the lake, a 
luminous floating mass of a red colour, transparent 
and clearly defined, with undulating outlines. It was 
unmistakably relieved against the other shore of the 
lake, which was wooded and at a distance of 750 yards. 
The length of the luminous mass might be about 200 
yards. Somewhat later a similar light was seen three 
times : it lasted on each occasion about two seconds, 
Hildebrandson considers this phenomenon as a tran- 
sition between the polar aurora and the electric dis- 
charge of a storm. 

Luminous effects, which are probably also forms of 
the aurora borealis, have on other occasions been seen 
very near the ground. The following case is thus 
described by Arago : ^ — 

'Major Sabine and Captain J. Eoss were returning 
in the autumn from their first Arctic expedition; 
they were still in the Greenland seas, during one of 
the dark nights of those regions, when they were 
summoned to the bridge by the of&cer of the watch, 
who had just seen something very strange. This was, 

' Zeitschrift der Ssterreichm Qesellschaft fiir Meteorologie, vol. 
xiii. 1878, p. 124. 

^ Arago, CEuvres computes, vol. iv. p. 146. 


ahead of the vessel and precisely on their course, a 
stationary light, which rose to a great height from the 
surface of the sea, while in all other directions the 
sky and horizon appeared black as pitch. There was 
no known danger in those regions, and the direction 
of the vessel was therefore not changed. When the 
vessel entered the ciixle of light the whole crew was 
silent, attentive, on the alert. The highest parts of 
the masts and sails could then be seen and all the 
rigging. The meteor appeared to extend for about 
four hundred yards. When the stern of the vessel 
left it it was again in darkness ; there was no gradual 
decline in the intensity of the light. The luminous 
region could be seen from the stern of the ship for a 
long time.' 

3. Homogeneous arcs. — In certain regions, and 
probably also at certain epochs, the polar aurora 
manifests itself simply as a very regular arc of a 
circle, with well-defined outlines and uniformly 
luminous in all its parts, so that it presents an abso- 
lutely homogeneous texture. It is under this form 
that the aurora borealis most often presented itself 
to Professor Nordenskioeld in 1878-79 during the 
celebrated wintering of the ' Vega ' on the northern 
coast of Siberia, almost at the entrance to Behring 
Straits.^ In this station the summit of the arc 

' Om norrsTcenen under ' Vegas ' oefvemintring vid Berings Sund, 
1878-79, af A. E. Nordenskioeld. A French translation of this 
work has been published by M. de Saporta in the Annales de Chimie 
et de Physique 1884, vol. i. 

Fig. 2. — WiKTEBiiJG OF the 'Vega.' Elliptical Arcs. 

^ ,f"T3««^"'^"-";7''^f5'iieif^ct, 


Fig. 3.— Winteeing of the ' Vega.' Elliptical Aecs, 


rarely exceeded a height of thirty degrees above the 
horizon, so that its centre remained well below the 

These arcs are generally completely motionless 
and remarkably permanent : they often retain their 
position for hours and even for several days. As a 
rule their summit is nearly in the magnetic meridian 
or the direction indicated by the needle of a compass. 
We shall recur to this coincidence, which is of great 

It sometimes happens that these arcs, instead of 
being circular, are distinctly elliptical (figs. 2 and 3). 
The two curves which constitute its upper and under 
edges may not be at all points at the same distance 
from each other; they may be, for instance, two 
ellipses having the same centre, and of which the axes 
are unequal ; in this case the width of the arc is not 
the same at all points (fig. 3) . 

Sometimes, instead of a single circular arc, there 
are two which are perfectly concentric ; they may 
even coexist to the number of three or four (fig. 4). 
A more remarkable and mush more rare case 
has also been observed by Nordenskioeld, that in 
which the aurora presents itself in the form of two 
arcs of which the centres are far apart, so that the 
arcs cut each other (fig. 5), or even only touch at one 
foot. But in this case the aurora no longer retains 
the fixity which characterises the single homogeneous 
arc : these anomalous forms only last a short time, and 


are a transition towards the variable auroras which 
compose the second class. 

4. Non-homogeneous arcs, or arcs with rays. — The 
arcs with rays, which constitute the first variety of 
auroras of the second class, may be developed by 
insensible degrees from the homogeneous arcs of the 
third type which we have just described. Instead of 
being formed of a fixed and even light, they appear 
to be composed of a great number of fibres or rays of 
which the direction is perpendicular to the length of 
the arc. As a rule these rays are more luminous 
portions detached, not from the dark ground of the 
sky, but from a paler nebulous arc. If, on the con- 
trary, the rays are projected on a very dark ground, 
and if at the same time they are wider than the 
spaces which separate them, the spaces take in their 
turn the appearance of rays or black stripes (see 
fig. 8) : these black stripes are not a distinct 
phenomenon and have no real existence ; it is only 
the dark background of sky seen through the narrow 
interval separating two luminous rays which are very 
near to each other. 

The transverse rays which compose the arc appear 
to be parallel to each if their length is not 
great ; but if they are sufficiently developed it becomes 
evident that they really all converge towards a fixed 
point in the heaven. This point is usually close to 
the magnetic zenith, that is to say the place to which 
a suspended and magnetised needle points. It is 

Fig. 4.-W1NTBEING OF THE 'Vega.' Multiple Arcs. 

Fig. 5.— Winteeino of the ' Vega.' Multiple Aecs with 



Fig. 6. — BossEKop. 

SucoBSsivB Appeaeamobs of the 



enough for the moment to indicate this fact, to which 
we shall return when we come to speak of the relation 
of the aurora borealis to terrestrial magnetism. 

The transverse stripes which compose these arcs 
are generally clearly defined at the lower end, fol- 
lowing a more or less regular curve which limits the 
arc. The upper end, on the contrary, is commonly 
less distinct ; sometimes the arc is shaded off above 
and seems to fade into the sky (fig. 6). 

The striped arcs have a less regular form than the 
nebulous kind, of homogeneous structure, belonging to 
our third group. Their lower edge often presents in- 
dentations or waves which the others have not. Yet 
the mean curve is generally about the same in both 
cases, and so with their colour, which is usually a yel- 
lowish white, and rarely shows red or violet tints. 

These arcs generally vary incessantly, as may be 
seen in fig. 6, which represents five successive stages 
in an aurora observed at Bossekop (Lapland) by 
Bravais and Lottin on January 12, 1839. The striped 
arcs change into more or less homogeneous arcs, or 
vice versa. Sometimes they seem to melt away at one 
end ; sometimes they vanish completely to reappear 
the next moment. At the same time they display the 
most varied movements ; for instance, they transport 
themselves from the north to the south, or the south 
to the north. At other times, again, the height of the 
arc remaining constant, its feet, that is to say the 
points at which it touches the horizon, move in direc- 


tions opposite to each other, as if the whole arc 
turned round averticalhne from east to west, or from 
west to east. The rapidity of these movements is 
very variable : at Bossekop, Bravais and Lottin fre- 
quently saw arcs rise as much as five degrees a 
minute ; once an arc changed its place with a rapidity 
corresponding to seventeen degrees a minute. It will 
be understood that these movements hamper the obser- 
vations considerably, and sometimes render it impos- 
sible to secure accurate measures of the form and the 
height of these arcs. 

Multiple striped arcs are not uncommon, at least 
in certain districts. During the 201 days which the 
French Commission spent at Bossekop, and out of 
151 on which there were auroras, on one occasion as 
many as nine arcs were seen at one time ; twice, seven 
were seen, twice, six arcs, once five, and three times 
four ; that is, there were nine nights out of 151 when 
the number of arcs seen at one time was four or more. 
Triple or double arcs were extremely common. 

Certain rays of the arc have sometimes a great 
length : this elongation is nearly always from the 
upper border ; once only, as an exception, the 
French Commission saw at Bossekop rays starting 
from the lower border of the arc and pointing to the 
horizon. This form of arc, from which long rays 
spring towards the zenith, is one of the finest mani- 
fested by the polar aurora in France. We give an 
example in fig. 7, which represents the aurora bore- 


alis observed at Paris on October 24, 1870 ; an aurora 
of the same form was again seen at Paris the follow- 
ing evening. In Mairan's work ' several similar 
auroras are reproduced, observed at Evreux in 1731. 

Among the different moveme'nts of the striped 
arc we must mention, in especial, a remarkable undu- 
latory appearance : the arc seems to move in the 
direction of its length with great rapidity, which may 
be as much as forty degrees a second. Bravais, who 
frequently observed this phenomenon in Lapland, sug- 
gests the same explanation as Mairan had offered ; i.e. 
that there is no real movement of the arc, but a suc- 
cessive lighting up of its different parts, which 
remain motionless or nearly so. A ray, at first but 
faintly luminous, becomes suddenly very brilliant for 
a brief instant and returns to its former state, while 
the next ray brightens in its turn, and so on from 
one to another. It is clear that if the successive 
illumination of the different rays takes place with 
great rapidity the eye cannot distinguish whether 
the arc really moves as a whole or whether it is only 
a sort of luminous wave which passes from one end 
to the other of the arc. At Bossekop this move- 
ment appeared twice as frequently from west to 
east g,s in the converse direction ; certain auroras 
showed the two movements alternately. 

' Traiti physigxie et historigue de Vaurore horiale, by M. de 
Mairan. Paris : Imprimerie royale, 1733. (Extracted from the 
Memoirs of the Eoyal Academy of Science, 1731.) A second edition 
of this work appeared in 1754. 


An appearance 'which often precedes or accom- 
panies a great number of auroras, but especially those 
of the types which we are now considering, is the 
dark segment, a sort of segment or circle of a darker 
tone than the rest of the sky, which occupies the 
horizon to a height of about ten degrees. It is pro- 
bably this dark segment which the Greeks and Latins 
compared to the mouth of a cavern, or to a gulf 
whence issue the fires of heaven ; and it explains the 
name of gulfs which they gave to auroras, as we have 
indicated in the history of the phenomenon. . 

When the aurora is in the form of an arc the 
lower edge of the arc limits precisely the dark seg- 
ment and seems to rest upon it. The dark segment 
is not formed by cloud or dense vapour, for the 
stars are often seen in it. 

The nature of this appearance is not yet well 
known : the French Scientific Commission at Bosse- 
kop often had occasion to observe it, accompanied by 
an aurora borealis, or even alone ; it is not, there- 
fore, merely an effect of contrast. On the other hand, 
it is not rare to see polar auroras which are neither 
preceded nor accompanied by the dark segment ; the 
two phenomena are thus, to a certain degree, inde- 
pendent of each other. Basing his opinion mainly 
on the total absence of the dark segment during a 
period rich in auroras, but when the serenity of the 
skies was remarkable, and also on the usual posi- 
tion of the dark segment beside the Frozen Ocean, 


Bravais thinks that the origin of this phenomenon 
need not be sought elsewhere than in the foggy 
vapour which generally lies on the horizon near the 
Arctic Sea. In spite of the weight which is justly 
attached to the opinion of Bravais, the explanation 
which he proposes appears at least contestable ; it 
cannot apply in any case to the numerous observa- 
tions of the dark segment in stations of which the 
geographical situation differs markedly from that of 
Bossekop, and where the neighbourhood of the sea 
cannot be invoked. On this point there is still much 
uncertainty, and a great number of observations, 
made under circumstances of great variety, will be 
needed to dispel it. 

To conclude the physical description of the 
auroras in the form of an arc we must note that 
in the greater number of cases the summit of the 
arc is in the magnetic meridian, or close to it. 
This rule is followed with remarkable exactitude in the 
case of those arcs especially which are not more than 
seventy degrees above the horizon. Thus at Bossekop 
102 auroras of this type had at their summit a mean 
position which did not vary more than six or seven 
degrees from the magnetic meridian. But marked 
exceptions occur occasionally. On the night of 
January 16, 1839, for instance, an arc was observed 
at Bossekop of which the summit was eighty degrees 
distant from the magnetic meridian. We shall 
return to this point later, when we come to con- 


sider the relations between the polar aurora and 
terrestrial magnetism. 

5. Auroral rays. Polar crowns. — We have just 
seen that, in the auroras belonging to the preceding 
type, rays are often observed which far exceed the 
limits of the arc. These rays often exist alone, and 
constitute an important class of auroras. These are 
luminous columns of which the length is much greater 
than the breadth, and of which the direction passes, as 
a rule, not far from the magnetic zenith. The rays 
which are in the magnetic meridian appear therefore 
vertical, while the others strike the horizon at an 
angle. This law of the convergence of the rays on 
the magnetic zenith is not, however, absolute, for 
Bravais frequently saw intersecting rays which seemed 
to pass over each other. 

The dimensions of the rays are very variable : 
some have a length of only two or three degrees, while 
others extend over more than half the vault of the 
sky ; their width is from a fraction of a degree to two 
or three degrees, rarely exceeding the latter figure. 

The rays are generally distinctly defined along 
their edges, and this, taken together with the move- 
ments of which we shall speak directly, distinguishes 
them from the patches and bands belonging to auroras 
of the second type. Their light is more brilliant than 
that of the arcs proper, and may be vivid enough to 
produce reflections in water or on snow. They are 
generally more luminous and more definite towards 








the foot than higher up. Finally stars may be dis- 
cerned through the rays as through the arcs. 

Sometimes these rays, very numerous and close 
together, become fused together, and produce a frag- 
ment of a striped arc, and even a complete arc ; at 
other times they form a bundle of rays resembling 
cirrus clouds or fibres of asbestos. We give drawings 
" of these groups of fibrous rays from a sketch by M. de 
la Monneraye. The dark rays, of which we spoke 
above, may also be distinguished in the illustration 
(fig. 8) . These groups of rays often change with great 
rapidity ; the one which we have chosen as an example 
presented five minutes later the aspect shown in 
fig. 9. 

Indeed, the special characteristic of the auroral 
rays is their extreme variability. They are subject to 
two kinds of movements : the lateral movement, which 
displaces them in a direction parallel to the horizon 
from right to left, or from left to right, and the longi- 
tudinal movement, towards the zenith or towards the 
horizon. Both movements may be very rapid ; thus 
Bravais observed on October 11, 1838, a ray which in 
twenty-seven seconds had covered a distance of ninety 
degrees, or half the heaven. 

The longitudinal or vibratory movement offers 
several remarkable peculiarities. Sometimes the ray, 
remaining nearly in the same place, lengthens itself 
rapidly towards the zenith, or more frequently towards 
the horizon; it is then said to dart. Sometimes, 


without altering sensibly in length, it rises and falls 
alternately, and is then said ,to play or to dance. This 
appearance of the aurora, fairly common in some 
countries, is designated by sixteenth-century authors 
leaping goats (caprae saltantes) or flying fires ; it 
probably explains the name of goats bestowed by 
Aristotle on certain luminous phenomena observed in 
the sky, as we have said before ; they are still known 
in Canada as marionettes, and in the Shetland Isles 
as merry dancers. 

We have said above that the direction of all the 
rays passes, as a rule, close to the magnetic zenith of the 
locality. When the rays exist in all directions round this 
point the result is the rude figure of a crown or glory 
with rays ; hence the name of boreal crown applied 
to this particular form. The centre of the crown 
may be luminous or obscure, according to the prolon- 
gation of the rays to their point of junction or their 
arrest at a certain distance. We give, from the 
drawings of M. de la Monneraye (figs. 10 and 11), the 
aspect of a boreal crown observed in Newfoundland 
in the night from September 1-2, 1892. Each of 
the drawings represents the half of the crown. To 
obtain an exact idea of the appearance the two 
drawings must be supposed to be joined together at 
their upper end, and then curved into the form of a 
cylinder, the lower part of fig. 10 being to the east, 
and that of fig. 11 to the west, the observer below, 
near the axis of the cylinder. 

Fig. 10.— Bay or Islands. Eastbbn Half of a Coeona Boeealis. 

Fig. 11.— Bat op Islands. Wkstben Haw op a Cokona Borbalis. 


Sometimes the rays appear only on one side of 
the magnetic zenith ; the crown is then incomplete : 
it is not closed, and forms a wreath. When, on the 
contrary, the crown is complete and furnished with 
very long rays, which descend almost to the horizon, 
the aurora forms a dome, which early authors call a 
tent, pavilion, cupola, &c. Finally, when the centre 
of the crown remains obscure, and the rays come very 
low down on aU sides, they form round the horizon an 
immense luminous band. 

At certain moments the rays which compose the 
crown enter into rapid movement, become very 
brilliant, and take on, instead of the yellowish white 
colour which is habitual to them, vivid tints of red 
and green. The crown then offers one of the finest 
manifestations of the aurora borealis. When one of 
these brilHant crowns forms itself in the midst of an 
already existing aurora, all the other lights of the 
aurora pale to reappear again when the crown is 

Although rare in low latitudes, the crown may be 
occasionally observed at a distance from the polar 
regions. Several examples are known in France ; we 
have already mentioned the aurora in the form of a 
crown observed and described by Gregory of Tours ; 
another, fully developed, which covered the greater 
part of the sky, was observed by Mairan on October 
]9, 1726, and is illustrated in his treatise on the 
aurora borealis ; a distinct crown was also observed 


in Paris, October 25-26, 1870. Finally, crowns have 
also been seen even nearer to the equator, notably 
that which is represented in fig. 15, which was observed 
at Melbourne in latitude 38° S. 

6. Auroras in the form of draperies. — We have 
seen that the rays of the aurora, when they are very 
numerous and very close to each other, may produce 
either striped arcs or crowns and wreaths. When 
the aurora is still more developed, and its form less 
regular, the appearances it presents are most compli- 
cated and remarkable, and constitute the finest 
manifestations of the phenomenon. All the rays are 
grouped into a wide band, which takes the form of 
undulating drapery, and suggests the folds of a flag 
agitated by the wind. 

This type of aurora presents an infinite variety. 
Sometimes the general form is arched, as in figs. 1 
(frontispiece) and 12. At others this form disappears 
entirely, and the aurora really resembles ribbons or 
drapery (figs. 13, 14, and 18). 

The more brilliant parts appear to be in relief, 
while others, less illuminated, seem to pass behind or 
to form the hollows of the folds. In most cases, since 
there are no means of determining exactly the real 
form of the aurora and the distance of its different 
parts from the observer, it is very difficult to decide 
whether this appearance of reliefs and hollows is not 
simply an optical illusion, due to the differences in the 
intensity of the rays. But in certain auroras, such 






as those represented in figs. 12 and 13, it is impossible 
to doubt the existence of several distinct luminous 
planes which fold over each other. 

All auroras in the form of drapery, fans, undu- 
lated arcs, are in general clearly outlined along their 
lower border, while the light fades out gradually 
above and mingles insensibly with the sky. They 
often display the most brilliant colours. The lower 
part, along the outlined edge, is a brilliant rose 
carmine, sometimes slightly tinged with violet. This 
passes into a yellowish white, which occupies as a rule 
the greater part of the aurora, but which occasionally 
disappears almost entirely. Above, where the light 
becomes fainter, a bluish or greenish tint appears. 
If we add to these colours the effect of the incessant 
undulatory movement which stirs the aurora we shall 
be able to form an idea of the splendour to which this 
phenomenon may attain. 

Sometimes, instead of resembling a wide drapery 
shaken by the wind, the aurora presents the form of 
a long ribbon, folded back on itself several times, 
from the upper edge of which spring rays. This 
appearance was observed by Whymper in Alaska. 

Finally, a last and most curious modification is 
that in which the drapery seems to end in a narrower 
ribbon; this ribbon is nebulous and affects the 
strangest forms, among which that of a hook (fig. 14) 
was frequently seen at Bossekop by the members of 
the French Commission, 




1. Colours of the polar aurora. — We have already, 
in the description of the various forms of the polar 
aurora, indicated briefly the colours which they pre- 
sent. The most frequent is white, more or less 
tinged with yellow; it is the only colour of most 
auroras, especially those of our first three types, 
which are characterised by a nearly homogeneous 
texture and relatively slow movements. 

The fainter the light of the aurora, the more 
the yellowish-white tint becomes milky and difficult 
to define, a characteristic of all faint light. When, 
on the other hand, the light of the aurora is vivid, it 
is distinctly yellow. 

After yellowish white the colour which occurs 
most frequently is rose carmine ; a few auroras with 
more or less defined outlines are of this tint, which 
is, moreover, frequently that of isolated rays. 

The richest in colour of all auroras are, as has 
been indicated, those which are chiefly composed of 
rays in rapid movement, such as striped arcs, 










I ■ 

i ■ 



fc. -^ * ' ^ 















•i w 



crowns, wreaths, and draperies. In these cases the 
central part of the aurora generally remains of a fine 
brilliant yellow tint, while the two extremities are the 
one red, the other green. The red is almost always 
towards the lower part, and also in the direction 
towards which the ray moves, while the green is above 
or behind, in regard to the direction of the movements, 
whether the movement be in the sense of the length 
of the rays (vibrating movement) or of lateral dis- 
placement (undulating movement) . If the ray darts 
or lengthens itself downwards, the lower extremity will 
be red and the summit green, and these tints will be 
very brilliant for two reasons : first, because it is the 
natural order of the colours in a motionless ray; 
secondly, because it is in this order that they should 
be found from the direction of the movement. On 
the other hand, there is no marked coloration and 
the tint remains of a nearly uniform yellow when the 
• ray lengthens itself in an upward direction ; for while 
the red should be developed in the direction of the 
movement — that is, in the upper part — the upper part 
of the ray tends, on the contrary, to present naturally 
a green colour ; hence the two contrary tendencies 
neutralise each other. The observations of Weyprecht 
in Franz Josef Land entirely confirm these laws 
already established by Bravais at Bossekop, and- 
very few cases are known in which the distribution 
of colours was reversed. 
" The red and green tints have a corresponding 


intensity : when the red is very briUiant, so also is the 
green. The red remains the brighter of the two 
tints, and is also that which fades last when fog 
obliterates the aurora by degrees. Independently of 
the relative intensity of the two tints, the fact that 
red light penetrates fog more easily than green may 
have something to do with this. 

In very brilliant auroras the intermediary yellow 
tint may disappear altogether, and only the red and 
green remain. This frequently happens in the crown 
more particularly, of which the centre is then green 
while the whole periphery is red. 

We have said above that isolated rays are fre- 
quently entirely red ; it is, on the contrary, very rare 
to see rays which are entirely green. This pheno- 
menon only presented itself once to the French 
Commission during the whole of its stay at Bossekop ; 
on January 2, 1839, at 8.45 p.m., an arc composed 
solely of green rays was observed. 

According to some observers it would seem that 
the green colour is in certain auroras replaced by a 
blue or violet tint ; but this last colour is extremely 

The brilliancy of the colours of the aurora seems 
to have a definite relation to the state of the atmo- 
sphere. In high latitudes particularly, the observa- 
tions of Sir John Franklin, McClintock, Weyprecht, 
&c., have shown that the colouring of the aurora is 
less strong when the air is very pure, and increases 


when the atmosphere becomes foggy and its trans- 
parency is diminished. Another circumstance which 
should be mentioned in this connection is that the 
auroras in the form of drapery, which are generally 
the richest in colour, are usually seen only in regions 
where the seas are open in winter and free from ice, 
and where, consequently, fogs are of very frequent 
occurrence ; such are the north of Norway, Spitz- 
bergen, and Newfoundland. • 

2. Intensity of the light of polar auroras. — The 
intensity of the light emitted by polar auroras is 
usually feeble, even in the most brilliant auroras. 
By the light of a very bright boreal crown, Bravais 
could hardly read a few words printed in the character 
known to printers as small text ; it was very easy, on 
the contrary, to read the same characters by the light 
of the full moon, of which the apparent dimension is 
however much smaller»than that of the aurora. The 
greater number of scientific men who have observed 
auroras in polar regions, where they are brightest, 
Parry, Bravais, Kane, Hayes, Weyprecht, Norden- 
skioeld, agree in the statement that the total illumina- 
tion produced by the finest auroras is generally inferior 
to that of the full moon, and rarely exceeds that 
of the moon in her first quarter. It is clear, then, 
that on an equal superficial area the brilliancy 
of the polar aurora is far inferior to that of the 

An indirect proof of this fact is found when we 


note the periods of the appearances of the aurora. 
Their frequency always diminishes when the moon is 
full, which shows that the general illumination of the 
sky produced by the moon at the full completely 
drowns a great number of auroras and prevents their 
being visible. This influence of the age of the moon 
on the apparent frequency of the aurora borealis had 
already been noted by Mairan, who found, on an 
average, three times as many auroras visible in that 
half of the lunar month which comprehends the new 
moon — that is, from the beginning of the last quarter 
to the end of the first — as in the half which com- 
prehends the full moon, from the end of the first 
quarter to the beginning of the last. 

There are, however, exceptional auroras which are 
suf&ciently brilliant to appear such even when the full 
moon is shining; witness the aurora which was 
observed all over Central Europe on February 4, 
1872. It has occasionally been averred that 
auroras have been seen in broad daylight, but the 
fact appears to be more than disputable. It is 
probable that there has' been some confusion between 
the aurora and certain cirrus clouds which resemble 
it, and may even be associated with it, as we have 
already shown. 

Another proof of the faint light given by the 
aurora is to be found in the facility with which the 
light of the stars penetrates it, without sensible 
diminution. "The stars of the first and second 


magnitudes may be discerned through the brightest 
aurora, and when the latter is diffused and milky the 
visibility of the stars extends to stars of the fourth 
and even of the fifth magnitudes. 

Nordenskioeld estimates, but without having made 
any experiments on the subject, that the motionless 
nebulous arc, which was the almost constant form of 
the aurora during the wintering of the ' Vega,' might 
be photographed in fifteen minutes. The sensitive 
plates which are now prepared would probably reduce 
this duration to a few minutes. The Swedish expedi- 
tion which wintered on Cape Thordsen (Spitz bergen), 
in 1882-83, tried in vain to obtain photographs of 
auroras. Sophus Tromholt afSrms, on the other hand, 
that he obtained, with an exposure of eight and a half 
minutes, a perceptible, though very faint, photo- 
graphic impression ; it is true that the part of the 
aurora which he tried to photograph was very faintly 
luminous. It does not appear that in these attempts 
ortho-chromatic plates have been used, though their 
sensibiUty to green and yellow rays is greater than 
that of ordinary plates. It may, therefore, be hoped 
that in the near future, by employing ortho-chromatic 
plates and trying the experiment with brilliant and 
slow-moving auroras, direct photographs of the polar 
aurora may be obtained ; this will permit a closer 
study of its forms and preciser measurements of its 
dimensions than have hitherto been possible. 

Some observers maintain that the stars scintillate 


less when they are seen through the light of the 
aurora than when they shine in a clear sky. But 
this is probably an error due to the presence of fog at 
the time of these observations ; for fog diminishes 
markedly the scintillation of the stars. On the 
contrary, it is clearly proved that the scintillation 
increases during an aurora. This fact, announced at 
the end of the last century by Uscher, has since been 
verified by Forbes, Necker de Saussure, Kowalski, &c. 
Finally, Montigny, having invented a scintillometer 
for measuring the degree of scintillation, has always 
obtained during the aurora borealis a higher number 
than before and after. Yet it must not be concluded 
that it is certainly the light of the aurora which 
influences _ the scintillation. For Montigny has also 
discovered that the scintillation increases equally 
during any magnetic disturbance, even when the 
latter is not accompanied by any aurora. Now, the 
auroras during which he noted the scintillation 
coincided with important magnetic perturbations. It 
is under these circumstances impossible to decide 
whether the increase of scintillation must be attributed 
to the aurora or to magnetic influence. 

Before concluding these remarks on the proper- 
ties of the light of the aurora, we may add that, 
according to Argelander, the passage of the light of 
the stars through the aurora does not alter their 
apparent positions. 

S. Nature of the light of the aurora. — The nature of 





the light emitted by the polar aurora and its origin 
may be studied in two dii3ferent manners. 

The first consists in ascertaining whether or no 
the light of auroras presents any traces of polarisation. 
Polarisation is a property which luminous rays 
acquire either by reflection or refraction, and renders 
them incapable, for instance, of traversing a prism of 
Iceland spar cut and placed at a suitable angle, or of 
being reflected from a mirror of glass inclined at an 
angle of 33° 30' on the rays. By studying any 
light with apparatus known in optics as analysers, 
polariscopes, or polarimeters, it is easy to recognise 
whether this light is natural light emanating directly 
from a self-luminous body, or whether, on the con- 
trary, it reaches the eye partially polarised, after 
undergoing one or more reflections or refractions. 

As early as 1817 Biot studied the light of the 
aurora borealis in a polarimeter, in the Shetlands and 
in Scotland ; he could not discover the smallest 
trace of polarisation. This result has since been eon- 
firmed by a great number of observers, Macquorn 
Eankine, Nordenskioeld, &c. On the other hand, 
Arago and Baudrimont thought they recognised 
very faint traces of polarisation ; but this can hardly 
discredit the previous results, for it is sufficient for a 
cloud to reflect or diffuse the light of the aurora to 
produce at once traces of polarisation in this reflec- 
tion or diffusion of the light. The complete absence 
of polarisation, conclusively established on several oc- 


casions, is enough to prove beyond a doubt that the 
Ught of the aurora is not, like rainbows, halos, or 
parheUa, the result of a phenomenon of reflection or 
refraction, but that it is itself luminous. 

This important point is confirmed and completed 
by the results of the spectroscopic analysis. 

If the light emanating from a solid or liquid in- 
candescent body be passed through the spectroscope, 
the resulting spectrum is continuous. If, on the 
contrary, the source of light is gaseous, the spectrum 
is composed of a certain number of bright lines or 
stripes, separated from each other by dark intervals. 
The number, the position, and the brilliancy of these 
bright lines depend on the chemical composition of the 
incandescent gaseous body, and this allows us to 
recognise by the spectrum alone the physical state 
and the chemical nature of the luminous body under 

The spectrum of the aurora borealis, studied for 
the first time by Angstroem in 1866, is essentially a 
spectrum of lines; the light of the aurora is the 
product, therefore, of luminous gases, and not of solid 
or liquid incandescent particles; neither can it be 
due, as has sometimes been supposed, to a reflection 
of the light of the sun. Among the authors who 
have studied this question we may mention, after 
Angstroem, Struve, (Ettingen, Winlock, Zoellner, 
Vogel, Eand Capron, Norman Lockyer, Barker, 
Backhouse, A. Clarke, Wijkander, Lemstroem, and 


lastly Carlheim Gyllenskioeld.' We will indicate the 
principal results of their researches. 

Seen through a spectroscope of small dimensions, 
the spectrum of the aurora borealis is a single 
greenish-yellow line, placed between the two lines d 
and E of the solar spectrum. But if a large equatorial 
is used, so as to collect a great deal of light, and a 
spectroscope of great dispersive power, as many as 
thirteen or fourteen lines or luminous bands can be 
distinguished in the spectrum of the aurora. The wave 
length of these bands, expressed in millionths of a 
millimetre, is given in the accompanying table. ^ 

All these lines do not exist simultaneously in the 
auroras ; the brightest and most frequently seen, at 
least in polar regions, are 4, 7, 8, 10, and 13. The 
red line 1 has not yet been seen in high latitudes, 
although the red colour is frequent in them. The 
yellowish-green line, 4, is the brightest of all ; it is 
absolutely characteristic of the polar aurora ; it is 
often seen alone when the aurora is faint ; it is even 

' See on this branch of the subject : G. Eayet, on the ' Spectra of 
the Aurora Borealis,' Journal de Physique Thiorique et Appliquie, 
vol. i., 1872, p. 363 (a summary of the researches of Angstroem, 
Struve, Winlock, Zoellner, Vogel, CEttingen) ; Angstroem, ' Of the 
Spectrum of the Aurora Borealis,' Journal de Physique Thiorique et 
AppUquie, vol. iii., 1874, p. 210 ; Band Capron, Aurorce and their 
Spectra, London, 1879 ; Lemstroem, L'Aurore Boriale, Paris, Gau- 
thier-Villars, 1886. 

^ Most authors reproduce these lengths of wave in four figures ; 
this approximation appears to us to be purely illusory, for very 
often one cannot be sure even of the third figure, the measures 
being very difficult in the case of a phenomenon so faintly luminous 
and so mobile as the aurora borealis. 



distinctly visible when the aurora is so faint as to 
be imperceptible to the naked eye. 

Table of the Lines m the Spectrum of the Aurora. 

Length of Wave 


(millionths of a 

Colour and Position 



Red, between c and d 



Yellow, between d and e 



Yellow, between d and e 



Greenisli yellow, between d and e 



Green, between n and e d and e 


529-526 (band) 

Green, very near e 



Green, between e and b 



Greenish blue, between b and f 



Blue, very near f 



Blue, between f and a 



Blue, between r and o 



Blue, between p and a 



Violet, between G and h 



Violet, near h. 

The lines 10, 11, 12 and 13 become nearly 
invisible in those parts of the aurora which give the 
red line (No. 1) to the spectroscope. Finally, the last 
line (No. 14) has only once been seen, in Lapland by 
Lemstroem and under unfavourable circumstances ; 
the figure which indicates its length of wave is there- 
fore more uncertain than in the case of the other lines. 

There has been much discussion about the coinci- 
dences which may exist between these lines and those 
of known spectra — for instance, the spectrum of the 
electric spark in gases rarefied like those of Geissler's 
tubes ; but no very definite conclusion has yet been 
arrived at. The lines 10, 12, and 13 appear to o,ccur 
also in the spectrum of the electric discharge passing 


through dry rarefied air ; in this spectrum are also 
lines near to 5, 7 and 8, though absolute coincidence 
cannot be affirmed. For the other lines the uncer- 
tainty is yet greater. New researches are therefore 
needed to clear up this question, which is the subject 
of much controversy. 

The study of the spectra of lightning seems to 
furnish an argument favourable to the hypothesis 
which attributes to atmospheric air a certain number 
of the lines in the spectrum of the aurora. According 
to the observations of Herschel, Saussure, Vogel, 
C. Gyllenskioeld, &c., the spectrum of lightning gives 
seven brilliant lines, of which the length of wave is 
respectively 630, 569, 534, 526, 500, 486, and 463. 
These lines are very near to the lines 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 
and 1 1 of the aurora ; for some of them the coinci- 
dence appears to be exact. 

In spite of these arguments opinion is still divided. 
While certain authors recognise no analogy between 
the spectrum of the aurora and that of the air, others, 
on the contrary, consider that the resemblance is 
sufficient. Angstroem, for instance, considers that the 
spectrum of the aurora is composed of two distinct 
parts; on the one hand all the lines, except the 
fourth (length of wave, 557), form a first spectrum, 
that of rarefied air ; the conditions of pressure and 
temperature, very different in nature from those in 
laboratories,- sufficing to explain all divergencies, 
although Angstroem does not believe in the varia- 


bility of the spectra of gases. The characteristic 
yellow line (No. 4) constitutes in his opinion a special 
spectrum. This line has not been found in any 
known body ; ' Angstroem attributes it to a phe- 
nomenon of phosphorescence, or rather of fluores- 
cence. Oxygen, as well as several 6f its combinations, 
is known to be phosphorescent. Moreover, the light 
of the polar aurora is certainly rich in ultra-violet 
rays capable of producing fluorescence; a drop of 
sulphate of quinine has been made luminous by the 
action of the rays of the aurora borealis, and so also 
the double cyanide of platinum and potassium. 

It wUl be seen from the foregoing summary that 
the light of the polar aurora is not yet clearly known, 
notwithstanding all the researches bestowed upon it. 
It is one of the most regrettable lacunae in the theory 
of the phenomenon, and the one to which the attention 
of observers should be most directed. It would be 
desirable to undertake in the laboratory a series of 
experiments on the spectrum of the electric spark in 
rarefied air, varying as far as possible the conditions 
of temperature and pressure, and also those of the 
discharge itself. 

4. Sound of the aurora. — Another physicar phe- 
nomenon about which there is considerable disagree- 
ment is the sound which, according to some 
observers, sometimes accompanies the aurora borealis. 

• We ehall see later that this line of unknown origin occurs also 
in the spectrum of the zodiacal light. 


It is a very general belief in certain countries— for 
instance, in the Orkneys, in Finmark, and among the 
Indians of the territories round Hudson Bay— that 
the aurora is accompanied by a particular sound, 
somewhat resembling the rustling of silk. The 
Lapps, who also believe in the existence of this sound, 
compare it to the ' cracking ' which may be heard in 
the joints of the reindeer when in movement. A 
great number of trustworthy observers maintain that 
they have distinctly heard this sound during very 
vivid auroras. Others, on the contrary, have never 
remarked any sound which in their opinion could 
reasonably be attributed to the aurora ; we must note, 
however, that purely negative results cannot be set 
against a single positive and certain fact. 

The members of the French Commission of 
Bossekop, from whose work we have already borrowed 
so much, did not neglect this question. Once, for 
instance, on January 10, 1839, during a very brilliant 
aurora, Bravais notes : ' I listened with much care for 
possible sounds ; the circumstances were favourable, 
the air and sea calm, yet I only heard a very^ faint 
whistling sound, coming I knew not whence, but with- 
out doubt independent of the aurora, since it was 
continued after the latter had faded.' 

At another time, October 31, 1838, the sound 
appears to have been more distinct, for Lottin notes 
as follows : ' At one moment I, by an instinctive 
movement, took my cap off to hsten better, fancying 


that the rays darting above our heads made a sort of 
crackling sound ; perhaps the sound was due to the 
distant steps of some one, perhaps of some animal on 
the hardened snow. M. Siljestroem, at some distance 
from me, close to his house, had the same illusion at 
exactly the same hour.' Finally, Thomas, a mining 
engineer at Kaafiord, near Bossekop, who made at the 
same time as the French Commission very complete 
observations of the aurora borealis, notes on March 
10, 1840 : ' A noise resembling the rustling of straw 
was distinctly audible, and seemed to coincide with 
the darting of the rays of the aurora. This sound 
was only heard when the rays were near the zenith.' 

In spite of these observations, which appear to be 
very definite, the members of the French Commission 
pronounced rather against the existence of any sound 
proper to the aurora. ' Although I dare not,' says 
Bravais, ' question the validity of the testimony in 
regard to it, we must yet conclude that this sound is 
very rare. Moreover, during these observations the 
ear may be deceived by more than one source of error 
against which it is impossible to be too much on one's 
guard ; such are the whistling of the wind, the drift- 
ing of the dry snow, the distant murmur of the sea, the 
crackling of snow which begins to freeze again after a 
temporary thaw, &c.' Siljestroem, one of Bravais' 
companions, concludes in almost identical terms. 

It is certain that the causes of error are very 
numerous, and that the observer may be tempted to 


attribute to the aurora many sounds which have 
nothing to do with it, among which we may mention 
as a principal one in polar regions the incessant 
crackling of fields of snow, and the faint sounds which 
always accompany the formation of small needles of 
ice on clear, cold nights. Much more should we 
reject without hesitation the observations on the 
sound of the aurora which have been taken in the 
centre of towns, beginning with that of Messier, who 
claimed to have heard the sound of the aurora in 
1762, in the very heart of Paris. But, on the other 
hand, it seems very difficult to discredit altogether 
not only the general opinion of almost all the dwellers 
in the arctic regions, but also and especially a mass 
of testimony from competent observers. 

It would even appear that this sound is audible in 
much lower latitudes than that of Lapland. The 
astronomers Brorsen and Hansteen were both abso- 
lutely convinced of the reality of such a sound. J. E. 
Schonfeldt affirms that he also heard it in Livonia, 
September 20, 1839, in absolutely still weather, in a 
treeless plain covered with wheat, and far from any 
water, so that the causes of any disturbing sound were 
eliminated as far as possible ; the sound accompanied 
the rays, which darted towards the zenith. In spite 
of the neighbourhood of the sea, a keeper of the hght- 
house on Sumburgh Head, in the Shetland Isles, was 
so well able to distinguish the sound proper to the 
aurora, that once, being in a room v/ith closed 


shutters, he became aware of the existence of an 
aurora from this indication alone. We must add to 
these observations that of the aeronaut Eolher, who, 
having left Paris, then besieged by the Prussians, on 
November 20, 1870, in a balloon, disembarked in 
Norway. He heard a persistent sound the whole 
time that he was in a certain cloud, which emitted a 
strong odour very irritating to the bronchial tubes, 
like that of ozone. A fine aurora borealis was ob- 
served at precisely that time. 

Amid these contradictory statements it is well to 
be cautious, more especially as the great majority of 
travellers in the arctic regions have never heard the 
sound of the aurora. 

To the external sources of error already mentioned 
must be added another, purely physiological : many 
persons hear a whistling in their ears, which under 
ordinary circumstances does not reach their conscious- 
ness. Perhaps this sensation is more vividly perceived 
when the attention is strongly directed to the observa- 
tion of an aurora, especially when a ray is seen to 
shoot out suddenly, to which is referred instinctively 
a sensation of which the true source is purely sub- 

From the foregoing observations we conclude that 
it must not be considered as proved, but merely as 
possible, that during very vivid auroras a sound is 
produced analogous to the rustling of silk, to that 
which accompanies the sparks in an electric discharge, 


or, finally, to the characteristic sound of the fire of 
St. Elmo so often observed on high mountains, such 
as the Pic du Midi. In any case it is still an open 

5, Odour of the aurora.— The belief in the sound 
of the aurora rests perhaps in the mind of some 
people less on facts than on the analogy which exists 
between the aurora and the electric spark. It is 
probably, again, this analogy which has led some 
observers to think that they detected a particular 
odour at the time of certain auroras. Bergmann 
compared this odour to that of sulphur, Trevelyan to 
that of electricity (?) ; lastly, during the aurora of 
April 5, 1870, Sonrel at Paris and Eedenbacher at 
Dinkensbiihl in Bavaria, thought simultaneously that 
they perceived a peculiar acrid odour. But these ob- 
servations were made in the centre of Europe — that is, 
at a distance from the seat of the phenomenon — and 
in towns, where every species of odour abounds, 
thus taking away almost all value from the result. 
Up till now no traveller in arctic regions has mentioned 
a particular odour as prevailing during the aurora, 
even in cases when, as we shall see, the aurora was 
certainly very near the earth. It does not seem, 
therefore, that we are bound to reserve our opinion on 
this point as on that of the sound of the aurora ; no 
observation, made under conditions which inspire 
confidence, confirms the supposition that a particular 
odour accompanies the polar aurora. 




1. Extent of the auroras. — The extent of auroras 
is very variable : some are purely local phenomena, 
visible only within a narrow radius ; others, on the 
contrary, are visible simultaneously throughout a wide 

Local auroras appear to be more frequent in high 
latitudes, where alone the data in regard to them are 
certain. We have some valuable information on this 
head ; unfortunately it is still insufficient, for these 
observations are of capital importance to the theory 
of the phenomenon. 

During the winter of 1872-73, three polar expe- 
ditions were established in the arctic regions, and at 
points relatively near to one another. A Swedish 
mission, with Palander and Wijkander, was then 
wintering in the north of Spitzbergen, at Mossel Bay ; 
at the same time the Austro-Hungarian polar expedi- 
tion, on board the ' Tegetthof,' with Payer and Wey- 
precht, was ice-bound less than 800 miles to the east 
of Mossel Bay ; lastly, Tobiesen was taking observations 


at the Island of the Cross in the archipelago of Nova 
Zembla, at about 180 miles south of the ' Tegetthof.' 
Out of 100 days on which the Swedish mission 
observed auroras at Spitzbergen, there were, it is true, 
eighty-three on which auroras were also seen from the 
' Tegetthof ' ; but a comparison of directions, and of 
the hours at which the aurora was seen at the two 
stations, shows that there was seldom any coincidence ; 
very frequently nothing was seen from the ' Tegetthof ' 
when there was an aurora over Spitzbergen, and vice 
versa, although the atmospheric conditions were 
favourable. Tobiesen, who was even nearer the 
' Tegetthof,' observed thirty-five auroras on days when 
Weyprecht also saw them ; but, on the other hand, he 
notes three which were completely invisible to the 
Austro-Hungarian expedition, although the distance 
between the two stations was only 250 kilometres. 

So also the ' Alert ' and the ' Discovery,' the two 
ships of the English polar expedition under Captain 
Nares, wintering in Smith Strait in 1874-75 at a 
distance of seventy-five miles from each other, only 
seven times observed a coincidence in their notes of 
the aurora borealis. 

We shall give other examples, when we come to 
discuss the observations relating to the height of 
auroras, of the local character of many manifestations 
of the phenomenon. 

In contrast to these local auroras there have been 
others, especially in lower latitudes, which were visible 


simultaneously over a very wide area. In the night of 
August, 28-29, 1859, for instance, the same aurora 
borealis was seen at the same time over the whole 
of Europe, in the west of Africa, on the Atlantic, 
in the whole of North America, and as far as Cuba. 
The limit of visibility was marked by a line passing 
from California a little south of Sacramento; it 
crossed the United States, passing to the south of 
Jamaica, and ended at St. George d'Elmina on the 
coast of Guinea. 

Four days later, on the night of September 1-2, 
1859, another aurorawas visible over the wholeof North 
America ; its limit of visibility included Guadeloupe, 
Jamaica, Cuba, and the Sandwich Isles. At the time 
of this aurora it was broad day in Europe, and this 
probably is the only reason it was not observed here ; 
for it manifested its presence very clearly by magnetic 
disturbance and considerable interruptions in the 
telegraphic service, phenomena which have an un- 
doubted connection with the aurora borealis, as we 
shall show later. 

Perhaps the most remarkable fact in connection 
with these auroras of wide extent is that they are often 
produced simultaneously in both hemispheres. During 
the two great auroras of 1859 mentioned above, very 
remarkable auroras were also observed in Australia 
and at Santiago in Chili. It was the same with the 
great aurora of February 4, 1872. At that date 
an aurora borealis was observed in the immense 


zone limited on the north by a line drawn from 
lenisseisk in Siberia to the Bay of Polaris, at the 
northern extremity of Greenland, and to the south by 
another line passing through Bombay, Syene (Upper 
Egypt)) and Florida. This zon.e thus included a great 
part of Asia, the whole of Europe, and the north of 
Africa and of the Atlantic. Just at the same hour an 
aurora australis was visible over a great part of the 
southern hemisphere, notably in Australia, Mauritius, 
Eeunion, and Natal. The regions of visibility of the 
two auroras were thus separated only by a zone of 
about twenty degrees of latitude on either side the 

It would even seem that this simultaneity of the 
aurora borealis and australis is the rule and not the 
exception. Data with regard to the southern hemi- 
sphere are often wanting, yet we possess an uninter- 
rupted series of eight years of observations taken at 
Hobart Town in Tasmania, from 1841 to 1848, during 
which thirty-four auroras were reckoned. Now, every 
time that an aurora was seen at Hobart Town an 
aurora borealis was observed in the northern hemi- 
sphere, or, at least, if it were day-time in Europe, there 
were those important magnetic perturbations which 
accompany polar auroras. 

If it be remembered that the presence of the sun 
above the horizon prevents a given aurora from being 
seen over half the surface of the globe, and if we remark 
that, in the cases cited above, the aurora was seen in 


the whole of that part of the mean latitudes of the 
globe where it was night at the time of its appear- 
ance, it will not seem unreasonable to admit that 
at certain moments the lights of the double polar 
aurora may entirely envelop the earth, with the ex- 
ception of an equatorial zone of a width of about forty 

This wide extent contra.sts strangely with the very 
restricted area of other auroras, of which the limit of 
visibility is some few hundreds of square miles. It 
seems difficult to attribute the two phenomena to the 
same cause. We shall see that subsequent considera- 
tions lead to the same conclusion, and that we must 
separate entirely the great auroras, visible in low 
latitudes and occurring but rarely, from the very 
frequent and quite local auroras which are seen 
mainly in polar latitudes. 

2. Height of the aurora. — It is more than a century 
since the earliest attempts were made to measure the 
height above the surface of the earth of the luminous 
phenomena which constitute the aurora. They date 
from 1726, and are the work of Mairan. Before his 
time it was believed that the seat of the aurora was 
very near the earth, an opinion founded not on precise 
data, but solely on the rapidity of the movements of 
the rays and of the form of the aurora — a rapidity 
which it seemed impossible to reconcile with any great 

The method proposed by Mairan to determine the 


height of the aurora has been employed since by most 
observers, with certain modiiications in detail. It 
consists in measuring at the same moment, from two 
stations at a sufficient distance apart, and of which 
the distance from each other is exactly known, the 
angular height of a given point of the aurora above 
the horizon, and its azimuth. A simple calculation in 
trigonometry then gives, as in ordinary triangulation, 
the absolute height of the aurora above the horizon, 
and its distance from the two stations. 

This process, which is very simple in theory, is, 
however, extremely difficult of application. First of 
all it is essential that the observers should choose 
exactly the same point in the aurora ; and it is also 
necessary, on account of the rapid movements of 
most auroras, that there should be an absolute 
simultaneity of the two observations. This last 
condition is now comparatively easy of realisation, if 
the two stations are connected by telegraph or 
telephone. But it may be said that the first condition 
is never realised. For an aurora does not present 
distinct marks, easily recognisable from the two 
stations, such as those which are used in surveying ; 
even at a slight distance the effects of perspective 
completely modify the aspect of an aurora. To 
eliminate this source of error it has been proposed to 
choose that point of the lower border of the arc which 
is in the vertical plane of the two stations ; this method 
would give a satisfactory result if the lower border 


were clearly defined, and if the aurora were reduced to 
thin film. Bat nothing authorises this last hypothesis ; 
on the contrary, it is certain that the aurora has a 
considerable depth, so that its lower border, or what 
appears such to each station, corresponds in fact, as 
a result of perspective, to different points. And, 
farther, the lower edge, which is always the clearer, is 
yet itself always a little softened off ; what is taken 
for the edge is the point where the light is most 
intense — that is to say, which corresponds to the visual 
ray which meets the luminous mass at its greatest 
thickness. Now, it is certain that these visual rays do 
not coincide for the two stations. There is, then, very 
little likelihood that the points of the aurora chosen 
at two stations even at no great distance from each 
other will be the same ; we shall find manifest proofs 
of this in the discussion of certain observations. For 
all these reasons we must guard ourselves against 
attributing to the figures obtained for the height of 
auroras an exactitude which they cannot possess. 
There is a margin of possible error which in some 
cases attains to as much as half the numbers given. 
These are not, properly speaking, measures, but indica- 
tions of approximate size and distance. 

The first results attained by Mairan were quite 
contradictory to the then received opinion. Instead of 
finding that the aurora was at no considerable height 
above the surface of the earth, he always found the 
contrary : 266 leagues for the aurora of October 19, 


1726 ; 250 leagues for that of October 8, 1731 ; 160 
leagues for a sort of coloured shield which was 
observed during the aurora of February 15, 1730, &c. 
Mairan hence concludes, from all the measures that he 
was able to make, that the auroras seen in France in 
his time were situated at heights comprised between 
100 and 300 leagues. 

More recent observations taken in Europe lead to 
similar results. Thus, from an analysis of aU the 
observations collected about the great aurora of 
October 25, 1870, Floegel ' deduces the following 
conclusions : the altitude of the base of the rays is 
very variable ; it is usually comprised between 150 and 
250 kilometres (93 to 155 miles), but its extreme 
limits attain perhaps 100 and 300 kilometres (62 and 
186 miles). As to the summits of the rays, they 
often reach a greater height than 500 kilometres (310 
miles) ; it is even probable that they pass 750 kilo- 
metres (565 miles) ; but they appear never to reach 
1,500 kilometres (930 miles). 

However large these numbers may appear, they 
are not physically impossible, for falling stars have 
been seen of which the height was certainly some 
hundreds of kilometres, which proves that at these 
enormous altitudes there is still an appreciable 
quantity of air. 

All the measures taken, up to this day, of auroras 

' Zeitschrift der Gsterreichischen GeseUschaft filr Meteorologie, 
vol. vi. 1871. 


in mean latitudes have given similar results. Thus 
observations of the aurora of October 22, 1804, at 
Berlin and Halle gave Gilbert a height of 377 kilo- 
metres, or 223 miles ; it is true that, according to 
observations taken in Sweden, Baron Wrede estimated 
the height of the same aurora at 1,313 kilometres, or 
815 miles, nearly four times as high — a fact which 
justifies our remark on the untrustworthy nature of 
these figures. 

Other observations, made in England, and com- 
pared by Dalton, Cavendish, Potter, Airy, &c., have 
given numbers varying between 80 and 160 kilometres 
(fifty to ninety-three miles). 

Loomis ' has also determined the height of the two 
auroras observed in the United States in 1859, one 
on August 28, the other on September 2. These two 
auroras appeared to shine in the zenith at the more 
northern stations, whereas they were only some few 
degrees above the horizon in the most southern 
stations. A comparison of the observations gave 
seventy kilometres as the height of the lower edge of 
the arc of the first aurora, and numbers varying from 
twenty-three to seventy-five kilometres for the second. 
The upper edge had a height of 800 kilometres in the 
first case, and 730 kilometres in the second. 

Observing all necessary caution as to the accuracy 
of these numbers, it is yet certain that all the obser- 

' E. Loomis, ' The Aurora Borealis,' Reports of Smithsonian 
Institution, 1865. 


vations agree sufficiently to show that in mean 
latitudes the height of the aurora is considerable ; it 
appears rarely to be less than seventy or eighty kilo- 
metres for the lowest part of the aurora, while the 
summit sometimes attains several hundred kilo- 

The French Commission, during its stay at 
Bossekop, made many measurements of the height of 
the aurora. Bravais and Lottin observed simultane- 
ously at Bossekop and Jupvig, at a distance of about 
sixteen kilometres, or ten miles from each other. In 
spite of all the difficulties which they encountered, 
they thought they might conclude from the sum of 
their measures that the mean height of the arcs of the ■ 
aurora borealis at Bossekop is from 100 to 150 kilo- 
metres above the surface of the earth. If we examine 
their observations in detail we shall see that in a 
certain number of cases they found for the parallax 
of the aurora, or the difference of the apparent 
heights above the horizon, a negative number ; that 
is to say that the aurora, although seen towards the 
north, presented at the northern station a less 
apparent height than at the southern station, which is 
manifestly impossible. This result can only be ex- 
plained, as we have already shown, in one way : the 
observers saw the aurora under different forms, and 
really chose two different points. 

Bravais has indicated another method for measur- 
ing the height of auroras, which requires only one 


observer, but necessitates, on the other hand, an 
hypothesis which is at least disputable. This second 
method consists in measuring the apparent width of 
the auroral bands, which pass through the zenith, at 
their summit and at their foot. If we then assume 
with Bravais that the auroral band is parallel to the 
surface of the earth — that is to say, that all parts of it 
are at the same height— it is easy to calculate, accord- 
ing to the laws of perspective, the apparent variation 
in width which the band should present at its different 
points, and its absolute height above the earth. 
Bravais used this method as a verification of the first ; 
the results were nearly in agreement with the others ; 
therefore Bravais thought he might consider it as 
proved that ' the height of the arcs of the aurora 
borealis is as a rule between 100 and 200 kilojnetres 
above the surface of the earth.' 

In the article from which we have already quoted 
on the auroras observed during the wintering of the 
' Vega,' Nordenskioeld has calculated the height of the 
homogeneous arc, which was the almost constant 
form of the aurora in that district and at that 
time, by an indirect method which is something like 
Bravais' second plan. He measured only the 
angular height of the summit of the arc and the 
opening of the arc, or width of the angle of the two 
points where the arc cuts the horizon. To make the 
calculation with these data only, Nordenskioeld 
assumes that the arc is circular, and situated in a 


plane perpendicular to the radius of the earth which 
terminates in a point near the magnetic pole (lat. 80° 
N., long. 83° west of Paris). He concludes that the 
plane which contains the auroral arc, and which is 
perpendicular to this radius, cuts it at a distance of 
125 kilometres below the surface of the earth. In 
this plane the ring of auroral light would have its 
lower edge at about 200 kilometres above the surface 
of the earth. 

The hypothesis of Nordenskioeld requires more 
confirmation. But it will be seen that it leads, with 
regard to the height of the aurora, to a conclusion 
similar to that arrived at by other methods. 

In contradiction to all these observations which 
assign an enormous height to the aurora borealis, we 
might quote many others which lead to results entirely 

Farquharson, who had organised corresponding 
observatories in different parts of Scotland, found 
that the auroras often illuminated the lower surface 
of the clouds. In particular, simultaneous observa- 
tions taken on December 20, 1829, at Alford and 
Tyllynessle, assign an altitude of only 1,220 metres, 
or very nearly 4,000 feet. From observations in the 
Shetland and Faroe Isles, Trevelyan believes that the 
aurora often descends to fifteen metres only (fifty feet) 
above the sea-level. 

Parry and two of his companions observed at Port 
Bowen, on January 27, 1825, a ray of the aurora 


borealis projected between their ship and the shore, 
which was about a mile and three-quarters 
distant, and reached an altitude of about 670 feet 
only. Eoss and Scherer also mention several times 
auroral rays interposed between their two ships, or 
between the ships and icebergs. Finally, Sir John 
Franklin and many others affirm that they have 
seen the under surface of clouds lit up by the aurora, 
which certainly shone between these and the earth. 

Similar appearances were observed by the French 
Commission in Lapland. During the aurora of 
September 20, 1838, Bravais notes : 'A very large ray 
to the south-west ; it is evidently lower than the 
clouds. These clouds are clearly coloured from 
below ; the hghts are lower than the clouds.' Later, 
on October 31, Lottin observes a ray of the aurora 
between him and the mountains. Nevertheless, in 
spite of his own assertions, Bravais, in the general 
summary of his observations, explains these appear- 
ances as optical illusions. He attributes, for instance, 
the prolongation of the rays in front of a mountain to 
the reflection of the light of the snow crystals, and 
finally rejects the hypothesis of the proximity of the 
aurora, doubtless because it was in open contradiction 
with the results of his direct measurements as given 

Since this date the most skilled observers of this 
class of phenomena have collected a great number of 
data which place the matter beyond a doubt. 


Lemstroem,' during the Swedish expedition to 
Spitzbergen of 1868, several times saw auroral lights 
projected between him and the mountains situated at 
a short distance ; these hghts, studied in the spectro- 
scope, showed moreover the yellowish-green line 
characteristic of the aurora borealis. During a jour- 
ney in the north of Finland, in the winter of 1871- 
1872, the same observer ^ frequently perceived 
auroral rays below the clouds, and at a less height 
than the summit of the mountains. Once even he 
found himself in the midst of an aurora ; although he 
did not see in the heavens any distinct form of an 
aurora, the spectroscope gave in all directions the 
characteristic greenish-yellow line, even in directions 
where there was no snow, so that it was impossible 
to explain these effects of light by reflection. 

Hildebrandsson ' also mentions several auroras 
seen in Sweden in the region of clouds, or even below 
them. The second series of the ' Journal of the Inter- 
national Polar Commission ' (1882) contains (p. 54) a 
summary of the very interesting results obtained at 
Ivigtut in Greenland by an engineer, Fritz. Measure- 
ments taken simultaneously from two stations 
(March 15, 1872) showed him that the aurora was 
690 feet above the sea level and 1,800 feet from one of 
the stations. On February 26 of the same year the 

' Zeitschrift der Ssterreichischen Gesellschaft filr Meteorologie, 
vol. vi. 1871. 

^ Ibid. vol. vii. 1872. » Ibid. vol. xi. 1876. 



aurora was only at a height of 180 feet, and at a dis- 
tance of 360 feet. These auroras belonged, not to the 
type of homogeneous arcs (third class), but to our fifth 
class (auroras with rays). Moreover, their movements 
appear to depend almost entirely on the configuration 
of the land ; on the coast of Greenland they come as a 
rule from Davis Strait, and enter the fiords or valleys, 
up which they pass. Thus it appears that those who 
are in the fiord often have the impression that they 
are very near the aurora. Lastly, the movement of 
these auroras appears to be checked when the wind is 
strongly against them. These auroras, situated very 
near the ground, often display the phenomena which 
we described in Chapter II. (Auroras of the second 
class, p. 14), 

The most recent observations on polar auroras, 
made at the time of the International Arctic Expedi- 
tion of 1882-83, confirm the last results enumerated, 
and have, as a rule, given fairly low figures for the 
height of the aurora. 

Measurements taken at Sodankyla, in Lapland, 
gave for the height of the aurora numbers included 
between 20 and 80 kilometres (12 and 18 miles), 
recording only the observations in which the difference 
of the angular height of the arc above the horizon in 
the two stations, or parallax of the aurora, is more than 
one degree — that is to say, determined with some degree 
of certainty. In the course of these observations 
new proofs were furnished of the uncertainty of these 


measurements. Thus out of eight observations made 
on December 8, 1882, on the same aurora from two 
stations connected by telephone and situated only at 
a distance of only three miles, six gave negative 
parallaxes ; the two observers, in spite of the short 
distance which separated them, no longer saw the 
same phenomenon. This is shown with even greater 
certainty by the fact that a telephonic message to the 
northern station, ' Measure from the red ray,' could 
not be obeyed because at that station no trace of a 
red ray was apparent. 

During tfie same winter (1882-83) the Danish 
expedition stationed at' Godthaab (Greenland), under 
the direction of Paulsen, organised, to measure the 
height of the aurora, two stations situated at a dis- 
tance of 58 kilometres from each other (36 miles) 
and on the same magnetic meridian. The point 
chosen was in the vertical plane passing through both 
stations, and the time was indicated by rockets. Out 
of thirty- two measurements so taken, under conditions 
for obtaining accuracy rarely realised elsewhere, only 
ten gave a parallax of less than a degree ; in the other 
twenty-two cases, the height of the aurora averaged 
19 kilometres (12 miles), the lowest point of any 
aurora being 600 metres (2,000 feet) and the highest 
67 kilometres, 800 metres (about 42 miles). Two 
auroras, at a height of 4,500 feet and 1,900 feet 
respectively, hung over the gulf between the two 
points of observation ; both were draped auroras. 


From all this evidence we are entitled to conclude 
that the altitude of polar auroras varies within very 
wide limits, and that, in spite of the opinion of cer- 
tain authors, it is certainly possible to observe auroral 
manifestations quite near the surface of the earth, 
some even very complicated, such as the draped 
auroras ; the observations of Paulsen, just mentioned, 
leave no doubt on this head. 

But let us distinguish. In mean latitudes, in 
France and Central Europe, all measurements of the 
height of the aurora have always given very high 
numbers. The figures are no doubt often disputable ; 
but, allowing for all uncertainty, it seems impossible to 
reduce them to a few miles, as in the case of some 
of the measurements taken in polar regions. It is 
only in latitudes above the 55th or 60th parallel that 
auroras are undoubtedly found at a much lower level, 
and sometimes even quite near the surface of the 
earth. . It seems, then, lawful to assume that the mean 
height at which the aurora is produced diminishes as 
we approach the poles. Perhaps exceeding 100 kilo- 
metres (60 miles) in low latitudes, it descends to some 
tens of miles in the Arctic regions, and may even be 
quite near the ground. 

It must be noted that the extent of the aurora 
appears to bear a certain relation to its height. The 
extensive auroras — those, for instance, which are 
seen simultaneously in the two hemispheres — appear 
to shine from an immense height. On the other 


hand, the auroras which are at low levels are always 
very limited in area, or even purely local. This 
appears to be another point in favour of the opinion 
already stated — namely, that these two categories of 
auroras are really distinct phenomena, both in their 
properties and in their origin. We shall, in subse- 
quent pages, adduce other facts in support of this 

} 3. Frequency of the polar auroras. — Under this 
title we comprehend only the study of the absolute 
frequency of the aurora ; that is to say, the total 
number of auroras observed in a given country during 
a long period of time — one or two centuries, for 
instance. The more or less regular variations to 
which this frequency is subject in the same country, 
in the course of the year or from one year to another, 
will be treated in the next chapter. 

The frequency of the aurora is determined from a 
study of the catalogues of the aurora borealis and 
australis, which give a list of all the auroras observed 
in modern times, and of those of antiquity of which 
any trace can be found in histories and chronicles. 
Of course the data increase as we approach our own 
day, so that the number of auroras appears to be 
continually augmenting, But in reality there is 
nothing to authorise such a supposition. 

The first of these catalogues is that which Mairan 
published, in 1733, in his treatise on the aurora 
borealis. The most complete is that of Hermann 


Fritz,' which includes the enumeration of all the 
auroras observed between 1700 and 1872. In this 
catalogue are summed up all those which had 
previously appeared, notably those of Mairan, Loomis, 
Argelander, &c. Some few others have been pub- 
lished relating to special districts ; for instance, that 
of Eubenson for Sweden and Mobreg for Finland. 
Most of the following figures are borrowed from the 
work of H. Fritz. 

As the absolute frequency of the aurora is not the 
same at all epochs, either on account of periodic 
variation or as a consequence of insufficient observa- 
tion in earlier times, Fritz begins by reducing all the 
numbers proportionately to the same period — 1700- 
1872. During these 172 years, 4,834 auroras were 
observed in that part of Europe comprised between 
the latitudes 46 and 55, giving an average of twenty- 
eight auroras a year. If in a given country a certain 
number, a, of auroras has been observed in a definite 
time, and if during the same period we find in the cata- 
logue a number of auroras, b, for the part of Europe 
which we have indicated, the probable mean number 
of auroras, n, which should have been seen in a year in 
the country under consideration from 1700 to 1872, 
if observations had been taken all that time, will be 



' Verzeichniss beohachteter Polarlichter, zusammengestellt von 
H. Fritz. Gedruokt auf Kosten der K. Akademie der Wisaenschaften 
in Wien. Vienna, 1873. 


It is in this way that Fritz obtained comparative 
numbers for all countries, and, by indicating these 
numbers on a map, the geographical distribution of 
the frequency of the aurora. We reproduce (fig. 16) 
the map which, according to Fritz, gives this distribu- 
tion. The irregular ellipses traced on this map pass 
through points where the frequency of the aurora is 
the same. 

The first line, marked 0*1, corresponds to those 
regions where, on an average, O'l aurora is seen in a 
year, or, in other words, one aurora in ten years. In 
the Old World this line passes through the Straits of 
Gibraltar, the south of Italy, Constantinople, the 
Caspian Sea, and crosses Asia at about latitude 47°. 
In America it cuts Mexico, and touches the souch of 
Cuba. Within this line the frequency of the aurora 
increases rapidly. One aurora a year is the average 
at San Francisco, New Orleans, the north-west corner 
of Spain, at Bordeaux, Lyons, Vienna, and Tobolsk. 
The average at Paris is a little less than four, and a 
little more at Berlin ; it is six in London, nine at St. 
Petersburg, ten at Liverpool and Copenhagen. Beyond 
this point the increase is very rapid ; the line which 
corresponds to thirty auroras a year passes in Europe 
through the north of Ireland, the middle of Scotland, 
Christiania, and the White Sea ; in America, through 
the south of Alaska, Lake Superior, Quebec, New Scot- 
land, and the south of Newfoundland. Lastly, about 
one hundred auroras are seen in the year at the Faroe 


Islands, Tronthiem, the south of Nova Zembla, the 
northern coast of Siberia, Behring Strait, and in the 
south of Hudson Bay and Labrador. 

Fritz' map must undoubtedly be regarded only as 
a first attempt ; in many parts the lines have been 
drawn from observations which extend over too short 
a period of time, or are themselves in insufficient 
numbers, and will probably be modified by further 
study. It seems to us, for instance, that the number 
of auroras indicated for Newfoundland is probably far 
too low, judging from the account of sailors who have 
spent a long time in those seas. But these modifi- 
cations will apply only to matters of detail, and the 
map may be accepted as showing in its broad lines 
the present state of our knowledge of the geographic 
distribution of the aurora. 

It will be noticed that the curves of equal frequency 
of the aurora borealis are neither circular, nor 
centred on the North Pole; they are rude ovals, 
of which the centre is in about 80° north latitude and 
75° west longitude (from Paris) — that is to say, close to 
the western coast of Smith Strait, to the north of 
Baffin Bay. We shall call this point, for brevity's 
sake, the pole of the aurora. 

The frequency of the aurora does not increase 
continually as we approach the pole of the aurora ; 
the increase in frequency, at first very rapid, as we 
have seen, slackens and finally ceases altogether. On 
the map, within the curve marked 100, is another, 


drawn with a heavier line and lettered maximum ; 
it passes by the North Cape, the northern extremity 
of Nova Zembla, the North East Cape of Siberia 
(Cape Cheliouskine), and cuts the meridian of 
Behring Strait at latitude 70° ; then it enters America 
a little to the west of Barrow Point, crosses 
Hudson Bay and Labrador, and passes well to the 
south of Greenland and Iceland. This curve unites 
all the points where the aurora is most frequent, 
so that the number diminishes as well within as 
without this line as we recede from it. The whole 
region in which the polar expeditions commonly 
winter — Melville Island, Baffin Bay, Smith Strait, 
&c. — are within this line and at a considerable 
distance from it. The travellers who have sojourned 
in these regions have all testified to the fact that the 
auroras are far less frequent than further to the 
south — the coasts of Labrador and Iceland, for in- 
stance — they are also much less brilliant. This 
diminution of the auroras in frequency and in 
intensity has been marked by Parry, Sir John Eoss, 
Kane, Hayes, Nares, &c. ; it is also manifest in the 
observations collected at the meteorological stations 
estabhshed by the Danish Government along the coast 
of Greenland. 

When, therefore, people speak of the frequency of 
the aurora in the polar regions we must not take this 
expression literally ; on the contrary, auroras are 
far less numerous in the polar region proper than 


further to the south. The zone of the maximum 
frequency descends even below latitude 60° in the 
whole region comprised between the middle of 
Hudson's Bay and the meridian which touches the 
eastern coast of Greenland. 

The observations of the polar aurora in the 
southern hemisphere are too few in number, and 
taken from stations too far removed from the Ant- 
arctic regions, to permit us to formulate any statement 
of the geographical distribution or of the frequency of 
the aurora in that hemisphere. 

4. Direction in which the aurora is seen. — We have 
already briefly indicated, in describing the principal 
forms of the aurora, that the summit of the auroras 
in the form of an arc, or the centre of the corona, is 
generally near the magnetic meridian ; we shall recur 
to this matter when we come to treat of the relations 
which exist between the aurora and terrestrial 
magnetism. But there is another more general 
question : to determine whether the aurora manifests 
itself habitually in the northern or the southern 
quarter of the horizon. 

In France and throughout Central Europe the 
aurora borealis is nearly always seen towards the 
north, although some pass the zenith, and even dis- 
play themselves entirely on the southern side. These 
cases are extremely rare, yet they may occur even 
in low latitudes. Thus on September 11, 1860, J. 
Schmidt probably saw at Athens an aurora borealis 


towards the south, which he took for an aurora 

As we go northwards these cases of auroras seen 
in the south become more and more frequent, in 
Sweden and Norway for example, and we finally reach 
a zone in which the aurora is quite as often seen in 
the one quarter as in the other ; the position of this 
zone of neutral direction is indicated by a dotted line 
on the map on page 133. This zone is situated within 
that of the maximum of the frequency of the aurora, 
and at but little distance from it, except in the 
neighbourhood of Iceland, where the two zones are a 
little further apart. In all places within this zone of 
neutral direction the aurora is far more often seen in 
the southern quarter of the horizon. It is the case 
in Spitzbergen, Greenland, and all Arctic countries ; 
thus the observations of Palander in Mossel Bay 
(Spitzbergen) give south 27° east as the mean direc- 
tion of the summit of the arcs ; the number of the 
auroras seen in the south is to that of the auroras 
seen to the north as eight is to three. So in all the 
Greenland stations the aurora is more frequently 
seen in the south than in the north. At Upernavik, 
for instance, out of one hundred auroras, eighty-one 
were seen between the south-west and south-east, 
fourteen in the east, one in the west, and four only 
between north-west and north-east. That is, there are 
twenty times as many auroras in the southern quarter 
of the horizon as in the northern. It thus seems to be 


well established that the mean position of the aurora 
borealis is precisely at the zenith of the points 
situated on the line of neutral direction. 

The observations collected at the time of the inter- 
national polar expeditions in 1882-83 furnished re- 
sults which agree at all points with those of earlier 
date. For example, at Fort Eae, on the shores of the 
Great Slave Lake in North-Western Canada, and at 
Nain in Labrador, the number of northern auroras 
was four times as great as that of southern ; these 
two stations are therefore, as the map indicates, 
outside the zone of neutral direction. On the other 
hand, the number of southern auroras was twice as 
great as that of northern at Jan Mayen Island and 
four times as great at Kingawa Fiord (in Cumberland 
Strait). These two points are both within the zone 
of neutral direction, the second being the furthest 
from it. 

With these conclusions we may compare those of 
Nordenskioeld in his work on the auroras observed 
during the wintering of the ' Vega,' from which we have 
already quoted (see page 62). After having com- 
pared the auroras which he observed at the entry of 
Behring Strait with those of other Arctic regions, 
Nordenskioeld thinks it possible to explain the 
principal appearances by the hypothesis of a lumi- 
nous ring encircling the earth almost constantly in 
the Arctic regions, the plane of this ring being 
perpendicular to a radius of the earth passing through 


its surface at lat. 80° north and long. 83° west (Paris). 
This point is nearly that of the pole of the aurora ; 
indeed, it may he said to he the same, when we con- 
sider the uncertainties which govern the determination 
of the two points. 

This luminous ring or aureola would be exactly 
above the line of neutral direction, and would have 
a radius of about 2,000 kilometres, or 1,230 miles ; 
its height above those points of the surface of the 
earth which have it directly at the zenith would be 
200 kilometres, or 124 miles. A second and larger 
luminous ring might be in the same plane as the 

This hypothesis, which accounts satisfactorily for 
some of the phenomena, presents certain difficulties. 
In the first place it assigns to the neutral zone a 
circular form, whereas on Fritz' map it is distinctly 
ovoid ; the uncertainties which may be felt as to the 
details of this map do not appear to be of a nature to 
modify the curves in a sense favourable to Norden- 
skioeld's theory ; rather the contrary seems probable. 
Moreover, Lemstroem has pointed out that the 
phenomena observed by Nordenskioeld are susceptible 
of a different explanation ; the same appearance 
would be produced by a luminous arc of 120 kilo- 
metres wide (75 miles) and of which the height was 
only 22 kilometres (between 7 and 8 miles). Lastly, 
nothing seems to show that the motionless arc which 
was the almost constant form of the aurora during 


the wintering of the 'Vega' is a general phenomenon, 
nor that it would be reproduced in the same region 
at a different time. As we shall see, the polar 
aurora is a phenomenon which has a marked perio- 
dicity, and it seems to be proved that the dominant 
forms of the aurora depend, not only on topographical 
conditions, but also in a given place on the epoch 
of the period, on the season, and many other cir- 
cumstances. In fact, in no other region, even situated 
also close to the maximum zone — in Lapland, for 
instance — has the same form been so constantly ob- 
served as during the wintering of the ' Vega.' The 
hypotheses of Nordenskioeld appear, therefore, to 
require further confirmation ; it was in any case of 
interest to compare them with the results obtained 
by Fritz solely by the study of the comparative fre- 
quency of the aurora and of the direction in which 
they are observed in different countries. 




In our study of the periodicity of the polar aurora we 
shall consider successively : (1) the diurnal period— 
that is to say, the variation of the mean frequency of 
the aurora at different hours of the day; (2) the 
annual period, or variation of the frequency of the 
aurora according to the month and season ; (3) the so- 
called secular period, of which the cycle may include 
a greater or less number of years. 

1. Diurnal period of the aurora. — The collec- 
tive observations of all countries show that the 
appearance of the aurora borealis presents un- 
doubtedly a diurnal period — that is to say, that the 
aurora has a manifest tendency to show itself at 
certain hours rather than at others. This periodicity 
exists not only for the aurora in general, but for each 
of its forms in particular. Thus the appearance of 
arcs, rays, discs, or patches, the hour when the rays 
take colours, attain their maximum brilliancy, undulate, 
and finally disappear, seem not to be a matter of 

At Bossekop, for instance, Bravais found that the 


first appearance of the auroral arc took place at an 
average hour of 7.50 p.m., that of the rays at 8.30 
P.M., and that of the discs at 11.20 ; the appearance 
which we have called 'palpitating' lights generally 
only appeared towards 1.30 a.m. Lastly, the coloured 
auroras manifested themselves especially between 10 
and 11 P.M. ; it is also at this hour that the auroras 
have, as a rule, their greatest intensity. It is not 
possible, except in winter in the Arctic regions, to 
determine the hour of the minimum of auroras, 
since they are indistinguishable by daylight. Seven 
or eight cases are known in which an aurora is said 
to have been observed in the daytime ; but most of 
these observations were taken in northern countries, 
in winter, and at an hour when the daylight was 
already fading ; in the other cases it is not certain 
that the observers did not mistake for an aurora 
certain clouds which, as we have said, offer a close 
analogy of form with the aurora borealis. We do not 
therefore know the law of the diurnal distribution of 
the auroras, nor, consequently, the hour of their 
minimum frequency. 

The hour of the maximum appears, on the con- 
trary, to be clearly determined ; it occurs, as a rule, in 
the first half of the night, and grows later as the lati- 
tude increases. Thus the mean hour of the maximum 
is 8.45 P.M. at Prague ; 9.15 at Oxford ; 9.30 at 
Upsala ; 10 at Christiania and in Canada. ; 10.30 
at Bossekop (Lapland) ; midnight at Fort Simpson 



and on Lake Athabasca ; 1.30 a.m. at Point Barrow 
(Maska) ; and finally between 4 and 6 a.m. at God- 
thaab (Greenland). In general the diurnal variation 
. presents only a single distinct maximum ; yet the 
observations of Palander and Wijkander gave two 
maxima at Spitzbergen, the one at 10.30 p.m., the 
other at 4.30 a.m., separated by a minimum at 1.30 
in the morning. In the daytime, at 12.30, there 
was another minimum, much more important, which 
cannot be attributed to the daylight, as in Spitz- 
bergen the sun remains for two months below the 
horizon. This double variation appears to be an 
isolated phenomenon, and is perhaps due to local 
causes, for the Tegetthof expedition, which wintered 
among the ice to the south of Franz Josef Land — that 
is to say, not far from Spitzbergen — recognised only 
one maximum at about 9 or 10 at night. The hourly 
distribution of the auroras observed at this station is 
as follows : 

Between 10 a.m. 

and 2 p.m. 

22 auroras. 

„ 2 P.M. 

„ 6 P.M. 


„ 6 P.M. 

„ 10 P.M. 


„ 10 P.M. 

„ 2 A.M. 


„ 2 A.M. 

„ 6 A.M. 


6 A.M. 

„ 10 A.M. 


We have seen in the preceding chapter that the 
maximum of the absolute frequency of the aurora 
for the different points of the globe follows an oval 
zone which has for its centre a point situated between 
the geographical and the magnetic poles, which we 


have named the pole of the aurora. Sophus Tromholt ' 
suggested that the diurnal variations which we have 
just indicated might be explained by a displacement or 
oscillation of this auroral zone, this oscillation taking 
place in the course of the twenty-four hours. In the 
evening, towards 8 o'clock, the auroral zone would, 
according to this hypothesis, occupy its most southern 
position ; then it would gradually pass towards the 
north till 8 in the morning, then moving south again, 
to find itself in its most southern limit at 8 on the 
following evening. The hour of the maximum for the 
more southern districts, such as Central Europe, 
would be that when the auroral zone was most to the 
south — that is to say, between 8 and 9 o'clock — 
while at the same moment it would be the hour of the 
minimum for the regions to the north of the auroral 
zone, such as Godthaab in Greenland, 

This explanation is evidently inspired by that 
which Weyprecht has proposed to account for the 
annual period which we shall speak of later. But in 
the case of the diurnal period it provokes two capital 
objections; in all the countries which are on the 
hypothetical course of the auroral zone, in Iceland, 
at the North Cape, in Nova Zembla, in the south of 
Greenland, there should be each day two maxima, at 
the hours when the zone passes the zenith,^ either 
when it moves towards the north or in its return 
towards the south ; now to this day the existence of 

' Sur les piriodes de Vaurore boriale, Copenhagen, 1832. 


two maxima has only been observed in one place, in 
Spitzbergen, by the Swedish expedition of 1872-73, 
as we mentioned above. In all the other places 
situated on the supposed course of the auroral zone 
there is but one maximum, which is contrary to the 

The other objection is that, if the auroral zone 
effected each day a movement of oscillation, the hour 
of the maximum should be for all the points situated 
on the same side of the zone and at the same distance 
from it at absolutely the same moment, whereas the 
diurnal variation of the aurora corresponds much 
more nearly to the local time. Thus the maximum is 
at 10 o'clock by the local time in Norway as in Canada 
— that is to say, at moments which are separated from 
each other by more than six hours of absolute time. 

This tendency of the aurora to follow the local 
time is not less evident when we consider a particular 
aurora. Thus Donati has pointed out that the great 
aurora of February 4, 1872, which was seen in both 
hemispheres, had its maximum everywhere at about 
the same local time, between 8.80 and 9.80 p.m., and 
not at the same physical Instant, although the 
difference in the longitude of the stations was more 
than seven hours. 

The hypothesis proposed by Tromholt cannot 
therefore be admitted, unless with important modifi- 
cations. If the diurnal variation of the aurora is to 
be explained by an oscillation of the auroral zone, it 


cannot be by any oscillation of the zone as a whole, 
the entire belt contracting and dilating alternately, 
all its points approaching or receding from the pole of 
the aurora. We must suppose not an oscillation, but 
a progressive alteration in the form of the zone, 
which should hollow itself, for instance, on one side 
only, this change in form passing all round the zone in 
the course of twenty-four hours. It is possible that 
some such explanation may prove satisfactory. But 
the data which we possess on the diurnal variation in 
the frequency of auroras in the Arctic region are not 
yet sufficiently numerous to permit of a complete 
solution of the question. 

2. Annual period of the polar aurora. — The study of 
the annual period of the aurora presents a special 
difficulty on account of the great variability of the 
length of the day in mean latitudes, and especially in 
high latitudes — that is to say, precisely in the regions 
where the aurora is most frequent. For it is evident 
that, other things being equal, the apparent frequency 
of the aurora will be greater when the night is longer, 
and conversely. Yet this difficulty is not so great as 
it would appear at first, inasmuch as the auroras 
generally last a considerable time, so that the end of 
an aurora which has begun in the daytime may be 
perceived after sunset, and especially because the 
maximum of the diurnal frequency of the aurora is at 

Mairan was the first to discover the law of the 


annual periodicity of the aurora borealis ; he re- 
marked that auroras are particularly frequent in 
France towards the months of April and October — 
that is to say, soon after the equinoxes — and that they 
are, on the contrary, rarer in January, and especially 
in June. The annual period presents thus, in France, 
two maxima and two minima. 

The winter minimum occurs precisely when the 
nights are longest — that is to say, at the epoch when 
most auroras would be visible if they were evenly 
distributed over the year. It must therefore be con- 
sidered as an undoubted phenomenon, consequent on 
the nature of the aurora. Nor can it be attributed 
to a meteorological cause, such as a greater quantity of 
cloud. „ For this law of periodicity is general; it is 
manifest at all the stations of mean latitudes and in 
both hemispheres ; now, in many countries there is not 
more cloud in December than in March or September. 

Mairan's results have been confirmed by all the 
observations taken in mean latitudes. We will only 
give as examples the annual variation in frequency 
of the aurora at Paris, New York, Sweden, and at 
Hobartstown in the southern hemisphere. In the 
table given below the numbers for each month 
indicate the relative frequency of the auroras in 
hundredths — that is to say, the number of auroras 
which, out of an annual total of 100, are seen in each 

It will be seen from this table that the quantity of 



cloud has no appreciable influence on the annual 
period ; the principal maximum in Paris is in October, 
when the aurora is twice as frequent as at the time of 
the other maximum, in April ; yet in this last month 
there is much less cloud in Paris than in October. 



New Yori 


















April . 





May . 





June . 

































The numbers, in the case of Hobartstown, result 
from a less number of years of observation than for 
the other stations. They clearly show the two maxima 
of autumn and spring, but it would not be safe to 
draw any other conclusions from them. 

In the three series of the northern hemisphere the 
two maxima of spring and autumn are very distinct ; 
it will also be remarked that the principal maximum 
is that of the autumn. This seems to be a general 
law, due probably to the influence of meteorological 
conditions on the production of auroras. 

The two minima of winter . and summer appear 
also to be unequal ; but this inequality is due, in part 
if not entirely, to the difference of the length of the 


nights in the two seasons. Thus the frequency of the 
auroras, nil in the month of June in Sweden, where 
there is properly speaking no night, is already sensible 
in Paris and still greater in New York, where the 
summer nights are longer than in Paris. Under 
these conditions it is hard to say whether the two 
minima are really unequal ; it is even possible that 
the principal minimum is the winter one. The New 
York series — which is particularly interesting from this 
point of view, since it seems to indicate that the 
principal minimum falls in December — comprehends 
unfortunately a less number of observations than the 
others, so that it cannot be regarded as giving definite 
results. Local climatic conditions may also play a 
part in the relative importance of these two minima ; 
but the existence of two annual minima in mean lati- 
tudes is indisputable. 

This law of annual periodicity appears to be 
modified in higher latitudes. The autumn maximum 
grows later and later, and that of spring earlier, both 
thus approaching the winter solstice. This fact, 
noted first by Levering, has since been verified by 
numerous observers. It even happens, in sufficiently 
high latitudes, that the two maxima are fused in one, 
which falls near the winter solstice. We give in the 
following table the proportion of auroras observed 
each month in polar regions, the annual total of 
auroras being supposed to be 100. The first column 
results from a comparison of the observations collected 



to the north of Baffin Bay by the polar expeditions 
of Parry, McClintock, Kane, Hayes, and Bessels ; we 
head them ' polar expeditions.' The second is deduced 
from the observations pursued uninterruptedly by 
Kleinschmidt at Godthaab in Greenland from 1865 to 
1882. This series is the most important of all which 
are available for these regions, both because of the 
care bestowed on the records and because of the 
length of time during which they were prosecuted, 
and especially because, being entirely due to one 
person, they are susceptible of strict comparison 
throughout. We give no number for the four months 
of May, June, July, and August, since the absence of 
night during that time permits of no observations of 
the aurora borealis. 

Polar expeditions 




. 8 

October . . 


• 14 



i 16 

December . 


. 18 

January . 


. 17 

February , 


. 14 



. 10 



The Godthaab series is much the best, for the 
reasons above mentioned, but it will be seen that 
both are agreed in giving but one maximum ; it is in 
December for Godthaab, in January for the polar 
expeditions which wintered in the same region, but 
yet further to the north. 

Weyprecht proposes to explain the annual varia- 


tions in mean and polar latitudes by a periodic oscil- 
lation of the zone of the maximum frequency of the 
aurora. According to this theory, the zone descends 
towards the south and recedes northwards again 
twice a year, occupying its most southern position at 
the equinoxes and its most northern at the solstices. 
This hypothesis accounts for the two annual maxima 
and minima of mean latitudes, and also for the 
winter maximum of high latitudes. It also points to 
a second maximum in the latter at the summer 
solstice ; but the complete absence of night at that 
season prevents the verification of this second conse- 
quence of Weyprecht's hypothesis. 

This hypothesis has been adopted by many 
authorities, among others by Tromholt, who even 
wished, as we have said, to extend it so as to 
explain the diurnal periodic variation. But latterly 
it has found an opponent in Paulsen, Director of the 
Meteorological Institute of Copenhagen. He points 
out ' that the two maxima of the equinoxes and the 
winter minimum are observed at St. Petersburg, 
Abo, Stockholm, and Christiania, whereas at Hammer- 
fest, in the north of Norway, there is but one maxi- 
mum, at the winter solstice. This latter station 
should therefore, according to the hypothesis, lie at 
all seasons to the north of the zone of the maximum 
frequency of the aurora, and this is contrary to 

' ' Contribution k notre Connalssance de I'Aurore borSale ' {Bulletin 
de I'Acadiinie royale danoise des Sciences et des Lettres, 1889). 


known fact. Paulsen remarks, in addition, that to 
explain the difference in the annual variation of mean 
and high latitudes there is no need to suppose a dis- 
placement of the zone of maximum frequency. It is 
enough to assume that a more active production of the 
phenomena of the aurora borealis in mean latitudes 
involves thereby a slackening of activity in the zone 
proper to the aurora. This hypothesis is an extremely 
probable explanation of the facts ; it agrees completely, 
as we shall see later, with the theory of Edlund. This 
theory explains the aurora by a flow of electricity 
from the equator towards the poles ; now, it is clear 
that if a greater part of this flow is manifest at a 
given moment in mean latitudes there will be less 
for the polar regions. Finally, direct observation 
seems to justify this view ; Kleinschmidt has shown 
that auroras were either non-existent or very faint at 
Godthaab at seasons when great auroras were seen in 
low latitudes. 

Thus, to sum up the argument, if in high lati- 
tudes more auroras are seen in winter than at other 
seasons, this is due merely to the fact that there are 
at that time fewer manifestations of the aurora in 
mean latitudes than at the equinoxes. The zone of 
the maximum frequency of the aurora remains at the 
same invariable position, or nearly so ; only auroras 
are a little less numerous in this zone when they are 
more numerous in lower latitudes. It only remains 
to explain why the annual period of the aurora 


presents two maxima, at the equinoxes, in mean 

3. Secular period of the aurora borealis: rela- 
tion of the aurora with the spots on the sun. — 
The study of the period of the aurora, embracing 
several years, presents great difiSculties on account ot 
the lack of regular observations which may be com- 
pared together and extending over a sufficient space 
of time. Every time that, in a given country, there is 
a change of observer, we remark a sudden variation 
in the annual number of auroras. It is necessary, 
therefore, as far as possible to collect the observations 
over a whole region, and not content ourselves with a 
single station, for it often happens that in two neigh- 
bouring places an aurora will be noted in the one 
which is unperceived at the other by a less attentive 
observer. At the present day, with the multiplication 
of observatories, it is hardly possible for an aurora to 
escape notice, unless the state of the weather is 
absolutely unfavourable. Eecent catalogues are then 
complete, or nearly so ; but this is not the case with 
regard to those of a century or two back. We have 
to search for the chance mention of auroras in the 
pages of historians ; and even so we only attain to 
very incomplete lists, which include only auroras of 
exceptional intensity. At still earlier dates the de- 
scriptions of chroniclers are couched in such ambiguous 
terms that it is often impossible to tell whether they 
relate to an aurora, a meteor, or a comet. In spite of 


these difficulties, it has been established that the ap- 
}>earances of the aurora borealis are periodic, and these 
longer periods are the more interesting that they, seem 
to coincide with those recognised in the case of other 
phenomena, such as terrestrial magnetism and the 
spots on the sun. The question of the secular variations 
of the aurora demands, therefore, a detailed study. 

The idea of periodicity in the returns of the aurora 
borealis occurred to Mairan. Although he had not 
determined the length of the period, he mentions all 
the occasions of the renewal of the aurora — that is to 
say, of the maxima of frequency — of which he could 
find the trace as far back as classic times, by con- 
sulting historians and chroniclers. He even goes 
further and asks whether it would not be possible to 
establish some analogy between the frequency, the 
cesHation, and the return of the spots on the sun and 
the manifestations of the aurora borealis.' ' This 
idea is encouraged,' he adds, ' by the fact that during 
these last five or six years, when the aurora borealis 
has been so frequent, so also have been the spots on 
the sun. It is known that at the beginning of the 
last century, after the invent! m of the telescope, the 
sun was hardly ever seen without spots ; and there 
were at times such numbers of them that P. Scheiner 
said that he once counted as many as fifty. They 
afterwards became more rare, so that from the middle 
of the century until 1670 — that is to say, for twenty 

' Mairan, TraiU de I'Aurore boriale, 1st edition, 1733, p. 250. 


years — only one or two were seen, and these only for a 
short time. Now, as we have seen, there was a great 
number of auroras at the beginning of the seventeenth 
century and till after 1621, after which date we hear no 
more of them till 1686.' 

After Mairan many authors have discussed this 
question, and proposed to explain the returns of the 
aurora by different periods. Hansteen believed that 
the period was ninety-five years on an average ; 
Denison Olmsted gives a period of sixty-five years 
divided into two parts, the one of twenty-five years, 
during which the auroras are numerous, the other of 
forty years, during which the cause which produces 
the auroras is in repose. But none of these tentatives 
have led to any satisfactory results until there was a 
return to Mairan' s idea of a relation between the spots 
on the sun and the aurora borealis. 

It is known that the periodicity of the sun spots, 
divined by Fabricius in 1610, was definitely proved 
by Schwabe in 1826, whose studies were ampUfied 
and confirmed by a great number of observers and 
men of science, among whom we may mention Warren 
de la Eue, Carrington, Secchi, Spoerer, and especially 
Eudolf Wolf, of Zurich. According to the latter, the 
spots on the sun observe a period of a little more than 
eleven years (eleven years and two months exactly) 
composed of two unequal parts ; there are, on an 
average, six years between the maximum and the 
minimum which succeeds it, and five years between 


the latter and the next maximum. The period of 
increase is thus shorter than the period of decrease. 

These facts relating to the sun spots are perfectly 
certain at the present day. The periods are not all 
precisely equal, being sometimes a little longer or 
shorter ; but they never fail to manifest themselves, 
and there is always an enormous difference between 
the number of spots which corresponds to a year of 
maximum and that of a year of minimum. 

In the following table we give, from the researches 
of E. Wolf and from a summary of these which has 
been recently published by M. A. Wolfer,' the epochs 
of the maxima and minima of the spots on the sun 
since 1610. We add to these after 1700 the relative 
numbers of the sun spots during the year under 
consideration. These numbers are obtained according 
to the method suggested by E. Wolf, by counting 
simply the number of isolated spots, and adding them 
together ; adding to these the sum of the numbers of 
groups of spots, each group being reckoned as equiva- 
lent to ten spots. We indicate only in round numbers 
the years of maxima and minima, neglecting fractions 
of a year. These are, indeed, still uncertain to the 
extent of a few months ; in earlier centuries the 
uncertainty may amount to a year or two. 

The periodicity of the solar spots which is set forth 
in the above table is a most marked phenomenon : 

' Bihliothique universelle de Oenive. ' Archives dea Sciences 
physiques et naturelles,' vol. xxvi. 1891, N". 12. 



Epochs of the maxima and minima of the spots on the sun. 

Belative number of 

the spots, after 1700. 








































































































the relative number of spots is only six on an average 
at the time of the minima ; it is ninety-three (or 
fifteen times as many) at the time of the maxima. 

In 1852 Sabine, Wolf, and Gauthier announced 
almost simultaneously that the variations of magnetic 
declension were also subject to regular periodicity, 
and that their period corresponded exactly with that 
of the sun spots. This coincidence, which is now 
perfectly recognised, became the point of departure 


for a series of analogous researches, and soon men 
sought to estabhsh relations between the spots on the 
sun and all meteorological phenomena. This was 
carrying things too far, and relations which were 
wholly illusory were the result ; nevertheless, some 
curious and genuine results were attained, among 
which may be reckoned those which concern the 
aurora borealis. Suggested, after Mairan, by Steven- 
son, J. A. Brown, E. Wolf, Secchi, and Hansteen, the 
relation between the aurora borealis and the sun spots 
was studied and finally proved by Fritz, Loomis, and 
Lovering. Fritz appears to have been the first who 
distinctly laid down the law that the number and 
importance of the auroras follow exactly the same 
variation as the spots on the sun, so that the epochs 
of the maxima and minima coincide almost exactly 
for the two orders of phenomena. 

Among the epochs of the maxima of the aurorji 
borealis we may mention in especial the years 1615, 
1686-87, 1707, and 1728, which are indicated by 
Mairan, and correspond fairly exactly with the maxima 
of the sun spots, as may be seen from the preceding 
table. In our own century the same coincidence is 
nhown principally in the years 1804, 1810, 1830, 1848, 
and finally in the winters of 1859-60 and 1870-71, 
in which we have more than once mentioned numerous 
and exceptionally extensive auroras. 

Yet if the agreement appears to be sufficiently 
satisfactory as a general rule, it must not be denied 



that there are considerable discrepancies in detail, 
as will be seen from the diagram (fig. 17), which 
represents by the lower curve the variation of the 
sun spots (relative numbers) from 1720 to 1875, and, 
for the same period, by the upper curve, the number 
of auroras seen each year in Central Europe, between 
the latitudes 46° and 55°, according to Fritz's catalogue. 

' tTii' IX: 

-17.EQ- 'za 


FiQ. 17. — Comparison op the Pbbqtjbnct op the Aueoka with 
THE Spots on the Sun. 

The line of the frequency of the aurora is far less 
regular than the other ; it is wanting in continuity, 
and presents atrupt transitions. Certain maxima of 
sun spots do not correspond to a maximum of auroras, 
for instance, in 1761 ; conversely, as in 1732, 1733, 
and 1734, there is a maximum of auroras where there 
is a minimum of sun spots. Finally, the epochs of 


the maxima and of the minima of the auroras outrun 
or lag behind, in an irregular manner, the corre- 
sponding epochs of the period of the sun spots. 

These discrepancies may be partly due to the fact 
that the auroras have not been sufficiently observed. 
In order to be sure that none escape observation . 
regular watch should be kept in countries situated in 
longitudes sufficiently far apart, so that it should 
always be night in one or other : for instances, in 
Central Europe, in the United States, and in the north 
of China. It would also be desirable to have similar 
stations in high latitudes ; but these observations 
should be considered separately from those of mean 

For, according to the researches of Tromholt, 
based on the observations of the aurora borealis 
collected in Greenland, it would seem that in that 
country the relation which we have indicated as 
existing between the aurora and the spots on the sun 
is reversed : the maximum of auroras being manifest 
during the minimum of sun spots, and inversely, that 
is to say exactly the opposite of what is observed in 
mean latitudes. Tromholt explains this contrast 
between Greenland and mean latitudes as he had 
already explained the diurnal period,* by supposing 
that the auroral zone executes, during the period of 
the sun spots — i.e. in a little more than eleven 
years — a movement of oscillation from the north 
to the south and conversely. We have already set 


forth, in our study of the annual variation of the 
aurora, the objections which may be made to this 
theory of an oscillation of the auroral zone, and we 
have indicated a simpler and more natural explana- 
tion, proposed by Paulsen. This explanation accounts 
perfectly for the antagonism apparent between the two 
regions, whether in the annual variation or any other 
period. However this may be, this difference may 
certainly be invoked as one of the causes which tend 
to disturb the parallelism between the period of the 
aurora and the spots on the sun. For if the maximum 
of the auroras corresponds, in mean latitudes, to the 
maximum of the solar spots and to the minimum 
in the arctic regions, it is clear that there must be 
between these two an intermediary zone, in which the 
law of periodicity is undetermined, and may be 
inappreciable or even quite different. Now this zone 
is precisely that in which auroras are most frequent; 
if then we consider together and without distinction 
the auroras of the opposing regions, or even those only 
of the intermediate zone, it will be easily understood 
that the law of periodicity is no longer very obvious. 

Another disturbing cause, on which we have 
already more than once insisted, is that we include 
under the common designation of aurora borealis 
phenomena which appear to be distinct both ia their 
producing cause and in their form and extent. If a 
first class of auroras, peculiar to high latitudes, is of 
purely terrestrial and even local origin, while another 


class depends more particularly on the yet unknown 
cause -which produces also the variations in the spots 
on the sun, it becomes quite natural that the relation 
of the sun spots with this second class of auroras 
should be obscured in part by the confusion between 
the two sorts of aurora. It is, therefore, desirable to 
reckon apart henceforward the auroras which are pro- 
duced over a wide extent of country and which are 
accompanied by general magnetic disturbances, and 
those which, on the contrary, have rather a local 
character, and coincide with no abnormal movements 
of the magnetic needle in mean latitudes. It seems 
to us probable that the general auroras of the second 
class, considered alone, would show a periodic varia- 
tion much more closely in agreement with that of 
the spots on the sun than has hitherto been 

We have considered at some length the period of 
eleven years shown by the aurora borealis. It is in 
truth the most obvious and the one which is most 
easily recognised. But there are besides other periods, 
both longer and shorter. Wolf discovered in the 
alternatives of the sun spots a period of about fifty-five 
years and a half, comprehending nearly five of the 
periods of eleven years. The superposition of these 
two periods results in the accentuation and weakening 
alternatively of certain maxima and minima of the 
undecimal period. Thus the maxima of the sun spots 
were particularly marked in 1778 and 1787, and in 


1837 and 1848, while the intermediate maxima, and 
especially that of 1816, were relatively weak. 

An analogous period is manifest also in the 
auroras. The most important maxima which have 
been noted in Europe are those of 1788 and 1848, 
which correspond nearly to the period under con- 
sideration, and coincide with the great maxima of 
the spots on the sun. Lastly, as in the case of the 
spots on the sun, the maximum of 1817 was very 

Beside these coincidences we must set cases of 
marked divergence. Thus the maximum of 1870, 
which was remarkable both for its auroras as for the 
sun spots, does not appear to enter into the period we 
are considering. The duration of this period, esti- 
mated at fifty -five and a half years, cannot, however, 
be considered as exactly known ; the interval of time 
covered by the observations is not yet long enough to 
furnish sufficient elements for calculation. 

Besides these long periods, other and much shorter 
ones have been noted ; it would seem easy to deter- 
mine these with great exactitude ; but the amount of 
the variation corresponding to these shorter periods is 
much slighter, and this renders the periods less dis- 
tinct. It is known that the sun spots are subject to 
a period of a little more than twenty-seven days, 
corresponding to the apparent rotation of the sun, or 
at least to that of the spots. It would seem that there 
exists in t\e frequency of the auroras an identical or 



very similar period. In any case great auroras are 
frequently seen at intervals of .28 or 30 days ; we give 
some examples of these coincidences : 

October 17, November 17, 1818. Interval 31 daya. 

January 19, February 19, 1852. „ 31 

September 1, October 1, 1859. „ 30 

October 14, November 19, 1865. „ 31 

October 22, November 14, 1868. „ 28 

April 15, May 14, 1869. „ 29 

January 3, February 1, 1870. „ 29 

September 21, October 34, 1870. „ 30 

An analysis of the epochs of the recurrence of 
auroras between September 22, 1846, and February 4, 
1872, gives Fritz a period of 27 days, 7 hrs., equivalent 
consequently to that of the spots on the sun. Veeder,' 
studying the records of observations taken in the 
United States, finds a period of twenty-seven and a 
quarter days. He thinks, moreover, that he may ven- 
ture to assert that every time that an aurora is seen 
there is a group of spots on the eastern border of the 
sun. According to him there is no exception to this 
rule, and auroras are only to be seen when such 
groups of spots are on the eastern border of the sun 
to the exclusion of every other position. The con- 
verse does not hold ; though auroras always coincide 
with the appearance of spots on the eastern border of 
the sun, sun spots may exist in that position without 
any corresponding manifestation of auroras ; but, in 
the latter case, the place of the aurora would be taken 

' Proceedings of the Rochester Academy of Science, vol. ii., 
Rochester, 1893, and American Meteorological Journal, vol. ix., 
p. 105, June 1803. 


by storms. This substitution of storms for auroras, if 
established, would be a very remarkable fact, and of the 
greatest importance to the theory of the phenomenon. 
On the other hand, some observers think that' the 
aurora borealis and magnetic disturbances coincide 
with the passage of the spots over the central 
meridian of the sun, and not with their appearance 
on its eastern edge. There is, moreover, a distinction 
to be established between the quiet spots and those 
which present an appearance of violent eruption, 
easily recognised by the spectroscope ; the latter 
only are in relation with the aurora borealis. It is 
to be desired that further researches, carried on in 
different countries, should be brought to bear on the 
laws enunciated by Veeder. 

To conclude : it results from all that precedes 
that the aurora borealis, in spite of its apparent 
irregularity, observes well-established periods — for 
instance, the diurnal period, the annual period, and 
the period of a little more than eleven years. Among 
the periods of which the duration is less exactly 
known, but of which the existence seems to be 
proved, there is one of about twenty-eight days and 
another of about fifty-five and a half years. Others 
have been surmised, especially one of 220 years, but 
they are extremely doubtful, and we will not stay to 
consider them. 




1. Relation of the aurora with the weather. — Some 
link has been sought for a long time between the 
polar aurora and various meteorological conditions, 
the height of the barometer, rainfall, wind, &c. ; but 
hitherto only negative or contradictory results have 
been arrived at. Whereas in Labrador, for instance, 
coloured auroras foretold fine weather, in Greenland, 
at no great distance, they seemed to herald the south 
wind and storms ; this was in particular the opinion 
of Scoresby. Hansteen concluded from his long 
series of observations, that at Christiania the aurora 
borealis was nearly always followed by a lowering of 
the temperature ; but on the other hand, Argelander 
says that at Abo and at Helsingfors the barometer fell 
and the temperature rose during the auroras. In short, 
it would not be difficult to give many similar pairs 
of contrasting opinions on the relations which may 
exist between the aurora borealis and the weather, 
even in neighbouring districts. And most authorities 
now admit that there is no connection between the 


aurora and the different aspects of the weather, and 
that the two orders of phenomena are entirely inde- 

Yet this independence is perhaps more apparent 
than real, and these contradictory conclusions are 
perhaps due to the fact that the problem is badly 
stated. First of all, it is evident that there is no 
possible relation between the weather and the great 
auroras which are seen at one and the fame time over 
nearly the whole surface of the earth ; we must begin 
then by eliminating all these great auroras, and con- 
sider only the local auroras, which are especially 
frequent in high latitudes. It is necessary to remark, 
further, that so long as meteorological science was 
content to study isolated phenomena, in each locality 
separately, apparently contradictory results were also 
attained : in one country, the south wind caused a 
fall in the barometer ; in another, though at but little 
distance, it was the north or west wind that produced 
this effect, and so on. In order to draw any conclu- 
sion from facts which were in such apparent contra- 
diction, it was necessary to consider not only what 
happens at a given point, but the simultaneous varia- 
tions of the various meteorological elements and their 
distribution over a wide extent of country. For 
instance, the connection between the movements of 
the barometer and the direction of the wind only 
became intelligible when charts, showing the distri- 
bution of pressure and the direction of the wind 


at a given moment over the whole of Europe, were 

If there be any relation between the manifesta- 
tions of a certain class of auroras (we have said above 
that there can be no such relation in the case of the 
great auroras) and any meteorological phenomena, 
this relation will certainly be discovered by analogous 
means, by studying the general distribution of pres- 
sure, of the temperature, of humidity, and of the 
winds over a great part of the northern hemisphere, 
at the time of the production of the aurora. The only 
attempt which has hitherto been made in this 
direction is that of Forsman, who arrived at the 
following conclusions : 

The variations in the barometer are generally 
opposed in the two parts of Europe which are 
separated by a line passing from the north of 
Scotland to the Black Sea. Now when auroras are 
observed in Sweden the barometer rises, that is, there 
is already a maximum of pressure in that part of 
Europe situated to the north-east of the above 
mentioned line ; the barometer falls on the other 
hand, i.e. there is a minimum of pressure, in the 
south-western part. These results need to be con- 
firmed and extended by further research ; they serve 
at any rate to show the direction which study should 

In the Arctic seas, which are alternately frozen in 
winter and free in summer, the aurora seems to 


follow the limit of the ice. This fact, to which 
Bravais first drew attention in Lapland, has since 
been confirmed by Weyprecht in Franz Josef Land, 
by the various Swedish expeditions to Spitzbergen, 
and more recently, in 1882-83, by the Austrian Polar 
expedition to Jan Mayen Island. This is an evident 
proof that the production of the aurora borealis 
may be influenced by certam meteorological condi- 

Independently of the relations which may exist 
between the appearance of the aurora and the 
particular state of the atmosphere, there are certainly 
other relations between this state and the form under 
which the aurora manifests itself ; it would seem that 
certain forms of the aurora are more commonly seen 
in particular countries, and are consequently in relation 
with the climatic and topographical conditions of the 
locality. The laws of the geographical distribution 
of the different forms of auroras need therefore 
special study, and it is probable that the results of 
such study would have an important bearing on the 
theory of the phenomenon. There are at present few 
data on this head. " 

In the north of Behring Strait, where the ' Vega ' 
wintered, the aurora constantly presented the form of 
an homogeneous arc, while the radiated forms were 
extremely rare ; during the whole winter only one 
aurora in the form of drapery was seen. Is this 
predominance of the auroras of the third type a 


geographical fact, or does it depend solely on the 
particular characteristics of the winter of 1878-79 ? 
This question can only be solved by further observa- 
tions taken at another epoch in the same region, and 
if possible at another phase of the undecimal period, 
for it is also possible that the general form of the 
aurora is not the same at the moments of the maxima 
and minima. 

We have somewhat more precise data on the 
draped auroras. With very rare exceptions, notably 
an aurora in the form of drapery seen in Paris on the 
night of April 15-16, 1869,' this form of aurora has 
been observed only in districts near the seas which 
in winter remain open and free from ice. The 
countries where these auroras have been chiefly seen 
are the north of Norway, Nova Zembla, Franz Josef 
Land, Spitzbergen, the eastern coast of Greenland, 
and Newfoundland. It may be noticed that these 
countries are all in the neighbourhood of the baro- 
metric minimum, which obtains as a rule in winter in 
the North Atlantic. This coincidence merits atten- 

2. Relation of the aurora with the clouds. — Clouds 
constitute the meteorological phenomenon which 
offers the clearest and least disputable relation with 
the aurora borealis. We have already mentioned 
(page 15) the close resemblance which obtains 

• We reproduce, (fig. 18) the appearance of this aurora, from the 
drawing of Silbermann. 


between certain forms of the aurora and the clouds 
•which are known as cirro-stratus and cirro-cumulus, 
a resemblance so close that it is often difficult to 
judge whether a given effect is due to real auroral 
lights, or to clouds lit up by some reflected Hght. 
We also remind our readers that we have mentioned 
several cases in which a halo produced by the refrac- 
tion of the light of the moon through the ice needles 
which constitute the cirrus, has been observed at the 
same time as an aurora. 

Sometimes these clouds are stretched out in long 
parallel lines, which, by the effect of perspective, seem 
to converge upon two opposite points of the sky. 
These bands of cirrus are, as a rule, in one or other 
of two directions. Sometimes they are sensibly 
parallel to the needle of the compass, and lie conse- 
quently north and south, within a degree or two ; 
they are then known as polar bands. At other times, 
on the contrary, they take a direction perpendicular 
to the preceding. In the first case they are oriented 
like the isolated rays of the aurora ; in the second 
they recaU the form and the disposition of the arcs. 

At Bossekop the French Commission had occasion 
to observe especially the cirrus clouds directed per- 
pendicularly to the magnetic meridian, that is to say, 
in the direction of the auroral arcs. The mean 
orientation of these bands of cloud, deduced from 
twenty- four distinct observations, was E. 28° N. — W. 
28° S., while the mean orientation of the arcs of the 


aurora was E. 21° N. — W. 21° S. The difference is only 
seven degrees, which is very httle, especially when we 
consider the difiSculty of such measurements and 
the irregularities which are not uncommon in phe- 
nomena of this nature. It is therefore legitimate to 
assume with Bravais that the cause, whatever it may 
be which determines the orientation of these bands of 
cloud, is also that which reg\ilates the position of the 
auroral arcs. 

Not only have these bands of cloud a close analogy 
in form and position with certain polar auroras, but 
as we have already indicated there seems often to be 
the closest connection between the two phenomena. 
Sometimes, when the aurora borealis disappears in 
the morning before the light of day, its place is taken 
in the sky by bands of cirrus ; more often still, these 
clouds are first seen in the daytime, and the following 
night the rays, or the arc, of the aurora replace them. 

Since Frobesius, who was the first to indicate 
some of these relations in 1739, a great number of 
observers have given numerous and curious examples 
of the analogies of the aurora with clouds. Hell, in 
1769, notices that these bands of cloud are, like the 
aurora, much more common in the arctic regions 
than in mean latitudes; he also signalised the 
apparent transformation of the aurora of the night 
into the cloudy band of the day, and vice versa. 
Weber and H. Fritz also remarked that every time 
that they observed polar bands of cloud during 


the day there was an aurora the following night. 
Winnecke considered the analogy so complete that he 
does not hesitate to regard these clouds as the vehicle 
of the auroral lights. 

After prolonged study of the subject Weyprecht 
arrives at the same conclusion. In his opinion the 
luminous phenomena of the aurora are such that the 
light seems to be intimately connected with material 
particles. Wherever two or more rays cross, the 
intensity of the light augments ; and this is also the 
case where an auroral band seems to make a fold ; 
moreover, the wind seems to act upon the aurora, 
which appears torn after a tempest; finally, the 
presence of clouds seems to favour the development 
of auroras. 

A last relation between cirrus clouds and the 
aurora results from the fact that the annual variation 
in the frequency of the aurora sensibly follows the 
same course as that of halos. Tycho Brahe observed 
this parallel march of the two phenomena, which 
presented maxima simultaneously in 1580 and in 
1590, years which must themselves be very near 
those of the maxima of sun spots. 

Hermann J. Klein, comparing twenty-five years 
of observations made with the greatest care at 
Cologne by Dr. Garthe, has shown that cirrus, cirro- 
stratus, and cirro-cumulus, that is to say the highest 
clouds, follow, as to their frequency, the same laws as 
the spots on the sun. They presented minima in 



1856-57 and 1865-66, and maxima in 1850, 1858- 
1859, and 1870 ; now the years of the minima of 
sun spots are 1856 and 1857, and those of maxima 
1848, 1860, and 1870. The agreement is thus as 
satisfactory as possible ; the amount of variation is 
moreover important; the mean annual frequency of 
the cirrus in the years of minima is about 95, while 
it rises to 140 in years of maxima. 

Tromholt attains similar results from a comparison 
of the frequency of auroras and that of halos. In the 
seventeen years 1857-73 the numbers were as fol- 
lows : — 


























































The parallehsm of the two series appears to be 
complete, especially when we consider the difficulty of 
these observations, which may be entirely suspended 
during long periods of bad weather. 

To conclude : an undoubted relation exists between 
certain clouds of the cirrus class and the aurora 
borealis ; the two phenomena are subject to the same 
laws of periodicity, succeed each other, or even coexist, 
their analogy being often so close that many observers 


are of opinion that the appearance of the aurora 
depends on the presence of these clouds. We shall see 
that these facts are of great importance to the theory 
of the aurora. 

3. Relation of the aurora with the electricity of the 
atmosphere. — It occasionally happens that certain 
electric manifestations occur near the surface of the 
earth at the same time as an aurora borealis. Thus 
Brewster once observed the fire of St. Elmo on the 
steeple of a church during an aurora. Hildebrandsson 
also reports that Oscar II., King of Sweden, saw in 
his youth, when navigating in high latitudes of the 
Arctic seas, the fire of St. Elmo during a great 
aurora borealis, though there was no other sign of 
storm. Lastly, the ships ' Webfoot ' and ' Southern 
Cross,' which doubled Cape Horn on September 1, 
1859, observed the great aurora australis, of which 
we have more than once spoken, and which was 
visible simultaneously in the two hemispheres; a 
violent storm then prevailed, and balls of fire were 
seen at the extremities of the masts and yards of the 

These three cases are perhaps the only ones known 
in which any manifestation of electricity was pro- 
duced near the earth during the aurora borealis. All 
other observations made in the most diflFerent coun- 
tries and under the most varied conditions never give 
anything but negative results. 

As early as 1770 Van Swinden had remarked that 


atmospheric electricity did not appear to vary during 
the prevalence of an aurora. In his various voyages 
to the Arctic regions, from 1819 to 1825, Parry made 
frequent experiments with a metal point carried on a 
mast 85 feet high, which was placed in communication 
with a sensitive electrometer. He never obtained any 
electricity during the auroras. Scoresby, Sir John 
Franklin, McClintock, Narea, &c. arrived at similar 
negative results, as also did Poey, who observed at 
Havana during the great auroras of August 26 and 
September 27, 1859, and Secchi, who caused observa- 
tions to be taken in several parts of Italy during the 
auroras of October 24 and 25, 1870. 

Eecent observations made with perfected apparatus 
of the most sensitive description have not given better 
results. During a period of magnetic disturbances 
whith was observed at Paris, from April 13-20, 1882, 
during the whole of which there were auroras on the 
Atlantic, although none were noticed in Central 
Europe, the register of atmospheric electricity at Paris 
indicated, according to Mascart, no perturbation which 
could be connected with the magnetic phenomena. 
This was also the case on October 2 of the same year, 
when a brilliant aurora was Been all over Central 
Europe, even to the shores of the Adriatic. 

Among all the missions which took part in the 
International Polar Expeditions of 1882-83, the 
Swedish mission which sojourned at Cape Thorsden 
(Spitzbergen) is the only one which, in the northern 


hemispliere, made regular observations of the atmo- 
spheric electricity. These observations were prosecuted 
by Andrea, by means of a Mascart electrometer. 
Andree found that before the appearance of an aurora 
the positive electric potential of the air diminishes 
abruptly, and even becomes negative, as usually 
happens when it rains. As soon as the iaurora appears 
the potential takes, as before, a high positive value. 
The single case of negative electricity observed in a 
clear sky (December 1, 1882) was followed a few 
minutes later by an aurora borealis. 

But it must be noted that the electric potential of 
the air, especially at a short distance from the surface 
of the earth, varies constantly in so abrupt and irre- 
gular a manner that it would be imprudent to assume 
any coincidence, even though these variations are 
observed during an aurora, since they are always 
happening. Sometimes at a station, where the sky 
remains clear, distant rains produce a negative 
potential, of which the cause would be unknown, if we 
had not the total of the meteorological observations 
over a vast region. Finally, the variations of the 
potential in two neighbouring stations often offer no 
resemblance. It would therefore be rash to assume 
a relation between auroras and the electricity of the 
atmosphere from a small number of observations 
gathered in a single station ; such a relation could 
only be considered as proved, if it were proved by 
repeated observations from different stations that a 


perfect simultaneity exists between the variations of 
the potential of the air and the different phases of the 

The recent experiments of Lemstroem in the 
attempt to produce artificially the effects of the 
aurora borealis bear on this question. These experi- 
ments, begun in 1871, have been prosecuted especially 
in Finnish Lapland in the neighbourhood of Sodan- 
kyla and Kultala, during the winters of 1882-83 
and 1883-84. 

At the summit of the hill Kommattiwaara, which 
attains a height of 426 feet, near Sodyanka, Lemstroem 
disposed an electric apparatus composed of a wire, 
bearing upright points at every twenty inches. This 
wire, of which the points were turned towards the sky, 
was arranged in an immense spiral square, covering a 
total surface of 435 square yards, each turn of the 
spiral being separated from the next by a distance of 
five feet. The whole was supported on posts eight 
feet four inches high, furnished with sulphuric acid 
insulators. Lastly, the end of the wire, also insulated, 
was carried to the observatory at the foot of the hill, 
and terminated in a disc of amalgamated zinc sunk 
in a neighbouring stream. Other similar apparatus, 
but of smaller dimensions, were placed experimentally 
at other points. In these conditions a galvanometer 
situated on the course of the wire indicated an electric 
current directed from the ground towards the atmo- 
sphere, when the apparatus was at a short distance 


above the surface of the ground. When, on the 
contrary, the height was increased to a few yards a 
current was observed to pass from the atmosphere 
towards the ground. If two such apparatus are 
disposed at different hfeights, the lowest being raised 
at least nine or ten feet, and a galvanometer is placed 
on the wire which connects them, the galvanometer is 
traversed by a current which passes from the higher 
of the two apparatus to the other. 

Above these apparatus were seen several times 
luminous phenomena, sometimes in the form of 
diffused lights, sometimes, but rarely, in the form of 
rays which seemed to dart from the points of the wire 
towards the sky. This light showed in the spectro- 
scope the characteristic greenish-yellow line of the 
aurora, whereas this ray was not visible in other parts 
of the sky. It even occurred that the line was visible 
above the apparatus when the eye could not distinguish 
any luminous appearance. A Holtz machine, put in 
action in the conductor, reinforces the luminous 
phenomena if it already exists, and may even provoke 
it if the circumstances are favourable. Lastly, 
Lemstroem observed three times, but only twice with 
absolute certainty, a luminous ray, analogous to an 
auroral ray, which started from the apparatus and 
gave the greenish-yellow line in the spectrum. Once 
this ray appeared during an aurora borealis in the 
form of an arc. 

Lemstroem considers these experiments very 


important to the theory of the aurora borealis. They 
have provoked much criticism, notably from Tromholt, 
who had installed a similar apparatus in Iceland and 
obtained no results. It seems to us, however, that we 
must admit the results obtained by Lemstroem, who 
conducted his experiments with great care and method. 
Yet their bearing is limited by the fact that they have 
hitherto only succeeded with himself, and in the 
particular locality where he prosecuted them. Vaus- 
senat, the founder and first director of the observatory 
of the Pic du Midi, installed in 1884, at the summit 
of the Pic du Midi, at an altitude of 12,440 feet, an 
apparatus similar to that of Lemstroem, but of yet 
larger dimensions. It was composed of a cable of 
galvanised steel wire, armed with ten or twelve very 
sharp points to the yard. The cable was carried on 
200 posts ten feet high, and covered a total surface of 
765 square yards, above which were 14,000 points. 

During the ten months that this apparatus re- 
mained in situ, a luminous ray was never once seen, nor 
even St. Elmo's fire, which constantly illuminates the 
lightning conductors of the observatory during storms.' 
The sole result was to produce in the neighbourhood of 
the wire violent electric discharges, which caused serious 
danger to the observers, the cables which put the sus- 
pended wire in communication with the earth being at 

' St. Elmo's fire is very common at the Pic du Midi on the 
lightning conductors ; at times, as I have seen myself, when the hand 
is raised in the air, tlie ends of the fingers are tipped with luminous 
balls, accompanied by the characteristic sound. 


times msnfficient to discharge the electricity which 
accumulated on the network of points. Once, when 
near the apparatus, Vaussenat had his eyebrows and 
eyelashes burnt, the skin of his face was scorched, his 
clothes singed, and the spring of his watch affected. 
On the same day and the following days sparks, passing 
along the communicating wire between the apparatus 
and the laboratory, struck several persons. It therefore 
became necessary to cut the communication and to 
interrupt the experiment. Vaussenat was convinced 
as a result of these attempts that the luminous effects 
observed by Lemstroem were none other than fires of 
St. Elmo. This conclusion appears indeed to be the 
most probable one. As to the current observed by 
Lemstroem to flow between the two apparatus placed 
at different heights, it does not appear to constitute 
a new phenomenon. The potential is known to be 
greater as we rise in the air; two such apparatus, 
therefore, placed at different heights, will always, if 
there is sufficient electricity, manifest in the wire 
which connects them a current from the higher to 
the lower. This is an entirely natural phenomenon, 
and in no sense implies the presence of electric 
currents in the atmosphere, but only that of a static 
potential, increasing with the height. In any case 
new experiments are necessary to prove the existence 
of electric currents in the atmosphere, and the rela- 
tion which Lemstroem has imagined between these 
phenomena and the polar aurora. 




The relations of the aurora borealis with terrestrial 
magnetism are of two kinds : in the first place, the 
auroras seem to depend, for their form and position in 
space, on the general distribution of magnetism on the 
surface of the globe, and especially on the mean values 
of the declension and inclination at each point. In 
the second place, the appearances of the aurora coin- 
cide, in a great number of cases, with the disturbances 
which affect from time to time the various elements 
of magnetism. We will examine successively these two 
orders of relations. 

1. Relation of the aurora with ihe general dis- 
tribution of terrestrial magnetism. — We have more 
than once mentioned the fact that the auroras in 
the form of an arc are generally so oriented that 
their summit is near the magnetic meridian. 
Thus, in France and in the greater part of Europe, 
when an auroral arc is seen in the northern quarter 
of the sky, its summit is generally between the 
north and the north-west ; it lies, on the contrary, 


between south and south-east if the aurora appears 
on the other side of the zenith, which is, moreover, 
much more rare. The rays, whether isolated or 
collected into an arc, a crown, or drapery, are nearly 
parallel to the magnetic needle, so that, according to 
the laws of perspective, the point on which these rays 
seem to converge in the heaven is near the magnetic 
zenith. The force which governs the auroras appears 
therefore. to be the same as that which the magnetic 
needle obeys. 

Yet this dependence is far from being absolute. 
The observations of Argelander at Abo between 1823 
and 1831 had already shown that, in that locality, the 
summit of the arcs of the aurora is on an average ten 
degrees to the west of the magnetic meridian. The 
French Commission at Bossekop arrived at a similar 
conclusion : the 226 arcs which were observed and 
measured at that station during the winter of 1838- 
1839 had a mean position of eleven degrees west at 
the summit. But individual cases show a considerable 
deviation ; 36 per cent, of the observations gave for 
the azimuth of the summit a distance of more than 
30° west of the magnetic meridian, and the extreme 
variations between the azimuth of the summit are 36° 
to the east and 90° west. Moreover, if the 226 arcs 
are classed according to their height above the horizon, 
it is found that their azimuth varies almost regularly 
according to the height of the arc ; thus the summit 
of those arcs of which the height is less than thirty 


degrees have only a mean deviation ot 6° from the 
magnetic meridian, whereas the summit of those 
which pass the zenith, and appear in the southern 
half of the sky, has a mean deviation of 13°. 

Bravais attempts to explain these variations by 
supposing that the magnetic declension is not constant 
at different degrees of altitude, but that it increases 
with the distance from the surface of the earth. In 
his opinion this hypothesis is the more probable that 
in the whole of the north of Europe the direction of 
the magnetic meridians presents a marked deviation 
towards the east ; it may thence be supposed that this 
deviation is caused by local causes, of which the 
influence becomes less and less sensible with the 
altitude above the ground, and thus a progressive 
increase of the declension becomes apparent at greater 
altitudes. Where the aurora is produced at a height 
of 150 kilometres (93 miles) an increase of one degree 
in 14 kilometres (Similes) would explain the mean 
deviation of eleven degrees to the west of the magnetic 
meridian manifested by the auroral arcs. 

This hypothesis involves consequences which 
render it very difficult of acceptance. For, as we have 
said, the deviation of the summit of the arcs with 
regard to the magnetic meridian increases with the 
angular height of these arcs. To explain this varia- 
tion it would therefore be necessary to suppose in 
addition that the absolute height of the arcs increases 
with their angular height; now this new hypothesis 


would give for those arcs of which the summit is on 
the southern half of the horizon so great an absolute 
height that these arcs must have been visible in the 
centre and even in the south of Europe, which was 
not the case. 

Eetaining the first hypothesis (increase of magnetic 
declension with the altitude) we might, to replace the 
second (increase of the absolute height of the arcs 
with their angular height), suppose that the polar 
aurora is at a less altitude in the atmosphere over the 
sea than over the continent. At Bossekop, as a 
consequence of the relative positions of the sea and 
land, the arc would be less high in its eastern half 
than at the other, and thus asymmetrical. Starting 
from the zenith the apparent summit of the arcs 
would then be deviated more and more towards the 
east in the degree that the arcs were at a less height 
above the horizon, towards the north as towards the 
south. The summits of the arcs would thus be 
nearer the magnetic meridian in the northern half of 
the heaven, and further from it in the southern half, 
which appears to agree with the observations. We 
must add, however, that this explanation would not 
apply in the case of other countries, Spitzbergen for 
example, where, however, the mean deviation of the 
summit of the arcs is the same as at Bossekop. 

In conclusion, Bravais thinks that all these causes 
act simultaneously, and that they co-operate in 
producing the observed deviations. But none of 


these hypotheses can be verified, even indirectly, and, 
if they offer an approximate explanation of the mean 
deviation of the auroral arcs at different heights, they 
are entirely insufficient to account for the considerable 
deviations which are observed when, instead of con- 
sidering the average, each aurora is studied separately. 
Thus on January 16, 1839, Bravais observed an arc 
of which the summit was 90° to the west of the 
magnetic meridian ; and on January 21 another arc 
had its summit 36° to the east of the same meridian. 
Observations taken in other regions have also 
shown that the azimuth of the summit of the arcs 
does not as a rule coincide with the magnetic 
meridian. Thus Nordenskioeld, during the wintering 
of the ' Vega ' in the north-west of Behring Strait, 
found that the summit of the arcs was very near the 
geographic meridian, whereas the magnetic declension 
was 20°. Two auroras observed far to the south, at 
Benares (1847) and at Macao (1838), had their 
summit 20° east of the magnetic meridian. The 
observations of the International Polar Expeditions 
of 1882-83 furnished similar results. At Jan Mayen, 
for example, the summit of the arcs was on an 
average four degrees east of the magnetic meridian ; 
at Spitzbergen the mean deviation, out of 371 mea- 
surements, was more than eleven degrees in the 
same direction. In Central Europe the coincidence 
appears more perfect. Finally, the observations 
made at Hobartstown and Melbourne give a mean 


deviation for the summit of the aurora of nine or 
ten degrees to the east of the magnetic meridian. 

The study of the orientation of the crowns and of 
the auroral rays leads to analogous results to those 
furnished by a study of the arcs. In general, the 
point where the rays converge, or what comes to the 
same thing, the centre of the crown, is very near the 
magnetic zenith. Forty-three observations of crowns 
taken at Bossekop gave between these two points a 
mean distance of less than a degree, which is about 
the amount of probable error in the observations ; 
the coincidence may therefore be regarded as perfect. 
But if we consider individual observations we find 
great divergences in detail, as in the case of the arcs. 
Thus on January 20, 1829, at Bossekop, the con- 
verging point of the rays of an aurora was at 15° 
from the magnetic zenith ; on two other occasions 
the deviation was 12°. 

In spite of these accidental deviations the mean 
position of the centre of the crowns seems to be at 
very little distance from the magnetic meridian in 
all countries where trustworthy observations are 
sufficiently numerous, as in France, England, Central 
Europe, &c. Thus on October 25, 1870, Heis found 
at Munster that the centre of the crown was exactly 
in the magnetic meridian and 65° from the horizon, 
while the magnetic inclination was 67°. The 
centres of the two crowns observed by Winnecke 
at Pulkova, April 34, 1859, and December 14, 1862, 


had respectively a height of 69° and 72°, the inclina- 
tion being a little less than 71°. In Spitz bergen, 
according to the observations of Palander in 1872 
and 1873, the centre of the crowns was only on an 
average two degrees lower than the magnetic zenith ; 
in the same country Carlheim Gyllenskioeld found in 
1882-83 for the height of the centre of the crown, 
after eighty-seven measurements, 79° 55', the magnetic 
inclination being 80° 35'. The same coincidence is 
observed in the southern hemisphere ; thus the centre 
of the crown observed at Melbourne during the 
great aurora of September 2, 1859 (fig. 15), was at 
one degree of angular distance from the magnetic 

The position of the centre of the coreal crown 
at Bossekop was not in perfect agreement with the 
hypothesis suggested by Bravais to account for the 
deviation of the summit of the auroral arcs to the 
west of the magnetic meridian, which we have in- 
dicated above. The mean position of the centre of 
the crowns was more than three degrees to the west 
of the vertical plane perpendicular to that which 
marks the mean direction of the auroral bands or of 
the arcs, and this difference is certainly greater than 
possible errors of observation. We must therefore 
admit either that the mean orientation of the bands 
of the aurora is not perpendicular to the magnetic 
meridian, or that the direction of the rays is not 
rigorously parallel to the magnetic needle. As the 


distance between the centre of the crowns and the 
magnetic zenith is less than the deviation between the 
summit of the arcs from the magnetic meridian, it 
appears more rational to admit that the arcs or bands 
are not perpendicular to this meridian. 

The conclusion of all that precedes is that the 
magnetic forces of the earth certainly play the 
principal part in the orientation of the aurora 
borealis. The . arcs or bands tend to dispose them- 
selves nearly perpendicularly to the magnetic 
meridian ; and the direction of the rays is sensibly 
parallel to the magnetic needle. Bat other causes 
may intervene and produce notable deviations in the 
arcs or the rays. We shall see later that the most 
satisfactory theory which has yet been proposed for 
the aurora borealis accounts perfectly, far better than 
the hypotheses of Br avals, for the mean deviation of 
the summits of the auroral arcs from the magnetic 
meridian ; it only remains therefore to account for 
the abnormal deviations, such as those which trans- 
port the summit of the arcs far from their mean 
position, as in the examples which we have given. 
The causes of these accidental deviations are yet un- 
known ; but it seems to us that they should be sought 
in meteorological conditions. Different parts of the- 
atmosphere, even at no great distances from each 
other, vary greatly in temperature and humidity. The 
electric discharges which constitute the aurora 
borealis encounter therefore at a given moment 


strata which are unequally conductive ; hence a cause 
of that want of symmetry observed in the form of the 
auroras, and probably of the deviations in direction 
which we have indicated, and which are sometimes 

As we have said, in a previous chapter, no very 
distinct relation has yet been proved between the 
aurora borealis and meteorological conditions; but 
this is perhaps because' a direct relation has been 
sought between the two phenomena, whereas meteoro- 
logical conditions may very likely influence, not 
the production of the aurora, but its form and 

2. Relation of the aurora with magnetic distur- 
bances. — Independently of the phenomenon of the 
direction of the aurora borealis, in which the influ- 
ence of terrestrial magnetism plays a chief part, the 
production itself of the auroras is associated, at least 
in many cases, with the disturbances which manifest 
themselves at irregular and variable intervals in the 
value of the different magnetic elements. 

It was at Upsala in 1741 that Celsius and Hiorter 
pointed out for the first time the simultaneity of an 
aurora borealis and disturbances in the magnetic 
declension. Between 1741 and 1747 Hiorter noted 
forty-six examples of this coincidence. He recognised, 
however, that the two phenomena might occur 
separately, and that magnetic disturbance accom- 
panied especially those auroras which were seen at 


Upsala to the south of the zenith. On the request, of 
Celsius, Graham pursued in London a series of 
corresponding observations to those at Upsala, and it 
was thus discovered that the magnetic disturbances 
occurred as a rule on the same day at the two 

These observations were afterwards continued by 
Wargentin, Canton, and Wilcke. The last discovered 
that every time, or almost every time, that magnetic 
disturbance is noted, it is accompanied by an aurora 
boreaUs, but that the converse does not hold ; that is 
to say, that auroras are often seen without any pertur- 
bation of the magnetic needle. 

Wilcke also studied, between 1741 and 1774, the 
relations of the aurora borealis with the magnetic 
inclination ; he was the first to note the coincidence 
of the centre of the crown with the magnetic zenith, 
and showed that during the auroras the inclination 
is disturbed as well as the declination. Thus he 
observed irregular variations in the inclination which 
sometimes attained to a degree ; he remarked at the 
same time that the centre of the crown altered its 
position in the sky in the same direction as the 
magnetic dipping iieedle.' Numerous observers, 
among whom we may mention Van Swinden, Cassini, 
Gilpin, &c., verified anew the discoveries of their 

' See on this question Wijkander, ' Ueber die magnetischen 
Storungen und ihren Zusammenhang mit dem Nordlichte ' {Zeit- 
schrift der Ssterreichischen Gesellschaft filr Meteorologie, xii., 1877). 


In observations taken at Montmorency, near 
Paris, Coote remarked, in 1780, an interesting fact, 
of which we shall have more to say later, for it has 
a great importance in determining the nature of 
the relations which exist between the aurora and 
magnetic disturbances; it is that the magnetic dis- 
turbances seem to be the earliest in order of time, 
and that the magnetic needle sometimes begins to. 
be agitated an hour before the appearance of an 

Lastly, the relations of the aurora with the dis- 
turbances in the magnetic force itself, and not only 
with those in the direction of the needle, were 
discovered in 1806 by Humboldt. He announced 
that the horizontal factor in magnetic intensity 
diminishes during the prevalence of an aurora. 
This proposition has since been verified, notably by 
Hansteen, Farquharson, and . Fos ; Hansteen also 
thought that the horizontal intensity increased con- 
siderably some time before the appearance of an 
aurora, and then diminished as soon as the aurora 
became visible ; the degree of this variation seeming 
to him to be in direct relation with the luminous 
intensity of the aurora. Lastly, Hansteen remarked 
that the magnetic perturbations sometimes last a long 
time ; the intensity has often not recovered its initial 
value more than twenty-four hours after the be- 
ginning of the disturbance. 

The magnetic association founded by Gauss and 


Weber in 1834, and the stations organised by Sabine 
in a certain number of English colonies, greatly 
increased the number of examples of coincidences 
between the polar auroras and perturbations in the 
three elements of terrestrial magnetism : declination, 
inclination, and intensity. But they also testify to 
the complexity of the question. For though the 
great magnetic perturbations, which occur simul- 
taneously in the two hemispheres, seem to be always 
accompanied by very extensive auroras, this is not 
the case with more ordinary disturbances. These 
often appear to be due to local causes ; they are not 
noticed at the same time in the two hemispheres, or, 
in the same hemisphere, are not manifested at the 
same time in Europe and America. Sometimes, 
even, this absence of concord may be remarked in 
stations much nearer to each other : thus, the per- 
turbations remarked by the French Commission at 
Bossekop had often no relation with those of Central 
Europe; the difference was especially frequent in 
the variations in the horizontal factor in magnetic 
intensity. It was then recognised that these local 
perturbations are not as a rule accompanied by 

A great number of analogous observations might 
be mentioned; we will only indicate the principal 
results obtained by Weyprecht at the time of 
the expedition to Franz Josef Land on board the 
' Tegetthof.' 


The magnetic perturbations which accompany the 
aurora borealis are greater in proportion to the 
apparent proximity of the aurora to the spectator. 
Thus motionless arcs and faint auroras, or those 
with slow movements, are generally unaccompanied 
by the slightest agitation of the magnetic needle; 
magnetic perturbation is, on the contrary, very marked 
during auroras with distinct outlines, and those 
which present luminous rays of a defined character 
and rapid movements; the greatest deviations of 
the compass correspond to the appearance of great 
rays, coloured red and green, which flash suddenly 
like lightning. 

Finally, during all the perturbations observed by 
Weyprecht, the needle was displaced towards the 
east, the horizontal intensity diminished, and the 
vertical intensity increased. According to Weyprecht, 
variations in the contrary sense, which are very rare, 
should be regarded solely as phenomena of reaction 
and not as true perturbations. 

In conclusion, as long as we consider only mean 
latitudes, such as Central Europe and France, that is 
to say, countries where the aurora has generally a 
great altitude and extension, we find a very satis- 
factory coincidence between the aurora borealis and 
magnetic perturbations. We must not even assume 
a priori that the apparent absence of auroras during 
violent magnetic disturbances is an argument against 
this relation. For Arago has shown that if the 


aurora sometimes appears to be absent during mag- 
netic disturbance, it is often because it is too distant, 
and is entirely below our horizon ; but it is then 
visible in more northern regions. 

On the other hand, the relations between auroras 
and magnetic disturbances seem to be far less certain 
in high latitudes. There, perturbations are often 

Fia. 16. — Chaet of the Frequency op the Aurora Bohealis. 

noticed to which no aurora corresponds ; often on the 
contrary auroras are seen, before and during which 
the compass needle remains perfectly still. The 
relative independence of the two orders of phenomena 
is especially manifest in those regions which are 
situated within the zone of maximum frequency (see 
fig. 16), and in a still more marked degree in the 


countries within the line of neutral direction, where 
the frequency of the auroras to the north is lees than 
that of those to the south. 

Thus, in his two winters spent respectively at 
Melville Peninsula and Port Bowen, not far from the 
magnetic pole, Parry never remarked any relation 
between the appearance of the aurora and the move- 
ments of the compass needle. Though Eoss obtained 
a different result in the same regions and noted several 
times the coincidence of the two phenomena, this 
coincidence appears rather to be the result of chance, 
for McClintock observed it only five times in two con- 
secutive winters, which confirms Parry's results. Kane 
arrived at a similar conclusion ; during the two winters 
of 1853 and 1855 which he spent at Port Van Eans- 
selaer, at the extreme north of Greenland, he never 
once observed magnetic perturbation during an aurora 
borealis. Bessels, who sojourned yet a little further 
to the north, at the time of the expedition of the 
'Polaris,', noted variations in the declination during 
one aurora only ; but that was the quite exceptional 
aurora of February 4, 1872, of which we have already 
spoken more than once, and which seems to have 
enveloped the whole earth, exce])t the equatorial zone. 
Finally, during the wintering of the ' Alert ' and the 
' Discovery ' in 1875-76, in the extreme north of 
Smith Strait, no relation was remarked between the 
aurora and magnetic disturbance. 

The fact that in the Arctic regions the aurora 


borealis is not, as a rule, accompanied by magnetic 
perturbation, is the more remarkable that magnetic 
perturbation displays in these regions an extraordinary 
frequency and extent. In mean latitudes, in France 
and Central Europe, the alterations in declination 
hardly exceed a fraction of a degree ; they very rarely 
attain to one degree, and there is no example of any 
perturbation having deviated the compass needle as 
much as two degrees from its normal direction. In 
Greenland and in the American Arctic regions, on the 
contrary, perturbations of eight to ten degrees are 
not uncommon. On December 24, 1858, McClintock 
observed at Port Kennedy movements of the needle 
which attained to a total amount of fifteen degrees. 
During the expedition of the ' Polaris,' Bessels noted a 
deviation of twelve degrees on February 4, 1872, a 
little before the appearance of the great aurora of 
that day ; he remarked, moreover, that on that occa- 
sion the magnetic disturbance preceded the aurora by 
about six hours. Finally, at Lively, on Disco I. 
(west coast of Greenland) 0. T. Sherman observed, 
between August 11 and 18, 1880, a variation of 
20° 40' in the declination. 

From all this we may conclude that there is no 
necessary connection between the aurora borealis and 
magnetic perturbation in the Arctic regions, that is to 
say, precisely where magnetic disturbance is most 
frequent and most considerable. This conclusion 
rests on an indisputable fact, the frequently observed 


absence of magnetic perturbation during the prevalence 
of an aurora. 

For, as we have said above, it is not possible, in 
strictness, to conclude anything from the apparent 
absence of an aurora during magnetic disturbance; 
but it is quite otherwise in the case of an absence 
of magnetic perturbation during an aurora j this 
absence, already noted in Europe, but exceptionally, 
by Wilcke, Bravais, and others, becomes the rule in 
Greenland and in the Arctic regions of the North of 

These facts are of prime importance to the theory 
of the production of the aurora borealis. Many authors 
have suggested the aurora borealis as the cause of 
magnetic disturbance. Bravais, in particular, though 
he recognised that the aurora obeys with respect to 
its position the regular laws of terrestrial magnetism, 
thought that this dependence was reversed in all that 
concerns magnetic perturbation, and attributed the 
latter to the direct action of the aurora. This theory 
is disproved by later observations, and in two distinct 
ways : first of all, because in the Arctic regions auroras 
are frequently seen while the compass needle remains 
quite stUl ; and in the second place, because when the 
two phenomena are manifest concurrently, it seems 
that the magnetic disturbance usually precedes the 
aurora. We have already indicated observations of 
this nature, among others those of Cotte, Hansteen, 
and Bessels ; we may also mention the great aurora 


australis of August 29, 1859, which was accompanied 
at Melbourne by violent magnetic perturbations (1° 9' 
for the declination) and by interrupted telegraphic 
communications ; now these disturbances preceded 
the aurora, which only appeared at the moment 
when the telegraphic communication had begun to 

In conclusion, it seems to us impossible, from all 
the preceding arguments, to hold that the aurora 
borealis causes magnetic perturbation, although that 
is the most generally received opinion. We think 
rather that magnetic disturbance, or else telluric 
currents, determine the production of some at least of 
the auroras. It seems to us, moreover, that most of 
the difficulties which we have pointed out would dis- 
appear, notably those which result from the indepen- 
dence of the aurora and magnetic perturbations in 
certain regions, if we admitted the existence of two 
distinct phenomena comprised under the generic name 
of aurora borealis. The one, comprehending the auroras 
which have a great extent, that is to say, almost all 
the auroras of mean latitudes and some of those of 
the Arctic regions, manifests itself at a great height 
in the atmosphere, and is always accompanied by 
magnetic disturbance. This is no longer the case 
with the auroras of lower altitudes, of small extent, 
and so to speak local, which are only rarely seen out- 
side high latitudes. Both kinds of polar auroras are, 
according to this theory, incapable of acting them- 


selves on the magnetic needle ; on the contrary, the 
former are, as it were, the reflection in the atmosphere 
of the interruption in the magnetic or electrical 
equilibrium of the earth. We are thus brought back 
by the study of the relations between the polar aurora 
and terrestrial magnetism to the same conclusion as 
that drawn from the consideration _ of the physical 
characteristics of auroras, of their altitude and 
periodicity ; that is to say, to the belief that in the 
appearances summed up under the general name of 
polar aurora, we have two phenomena distinct in all 
their properties and even in their origin, which it 
would be desirable to consider separately henceforward 
if we would arrive at more accurate notions as to their 
nature and the laws which govern them. 

3. Relations between the polar aurora and telluric 
currents. — Matteucci, at the time of the aurora borealia 
of October 28, 1848, remarked the coincidence of this 
phenomenon with interruptions in telegraphic com- 
munications, produced by telluric currents. This is 
the name given to currents which manifest them- 
selves spontaneously from time to time in wires 
isolated throughout their length and communicating 
at either end with the earth. Telegraphic wires are 
precisely such conducting lines, and, thanks to the 
length and multiplicity of these lines in all directions 
over the whole surface of the globe, we possess most 
extensive information about this class of phenomena. 
The telluric currents which thus pass along the 


telegraphic wires of some length are generally of 
sufficient intensity to set the electric call bell in 
motion, and sometimes absolutely to prevent the 
transmission of messages ; when they are exception- 
ally strong they may cause sparks and discharges of 
sufficient force to throw the mechanism out of gear, 
and even to be ^ source of danger to the personnel. 

These spontaneous currents are of two distinct 
kinds : some occur when a violent storm takes place 
in the region traversed by the telegraphic wire ; these 
have no relation with the aurora ; but it is quite 
otherwise with the telluric currents proper, which 
manifest themselves independently of any storm, and 
are, moreover, distinguished from the former by 
marked characteristics. 

When a cloud charged with electricity approaches 
a telegraphic line, the wire is charged, as it were, by 
influence, and the electrisation alters when the cloud 
moves off. If the cloud discharges itself suddenly, at 
the moment of a lightning flash, for instance, the 
wire instantly returns to the neutral state, and a 
momentary current is observed to traverse the 
apparatus at the stations. If one end of the line be 
isolated the phenomena remain the same at the other 
extremity, and the currents are even more intense, 
since the wire can only be charged and discharged 
from the one end. Finally, these currents, which are 
produced by simple influence, evidently cannot occur 
in subterranean or submarine cables ; nor are they 


observed in those wires carried through the air which 
are provided with a conducting envelope communica- 
ting with the soil. 

It is very different with telluric currents proper, 
which accompany magnetic perturbations and 
auroras. These currents cease when one end of the 
wire is isolated ; they are only manifested in single 
lines which have their return by the earth. It is not 
therefore an electrisation by influence which is 
produced in the wire, but a true current, identical 
with the currents produced by a battery, and it 
results from the fact that the two points of the earth 
where the extremities of the wire terminate are in 
contact with different electric potentials. These 
currents may therefore occur in subterranean or sub- 
marine cables, as well as in lines above ground, as is 
perfectly verified by experience. Lastly, their intensity 
varies in direct ratio with the length of the hne. 

The simultaneity of auroras and these telluric 
currents, discovered in 1848 by Matteucci, was clearly 
established at the time of the great aurora observed 
on the nights of September 1 and 2, 1859, over the 
whole of the American continent, dayhght alone, 
probably, preventing its being visible in Europe. 
Very interesting observations were made in France 
at the same date by Bergon and Blavier ; we quote 
from the notes on the subject published by Blavier,' 
the following details : 

' Annuavre de la SocUti MiUorologijue de France, vol. vii. 1859. 


' At all the telegraphic stations in France the service 
was impeded during the whole of September 2, but 
especially at two periods of the day, from 4.30 a.m. to 
9 A.M., and from noon to 3 p.m. These two periods 
were the same at all stations, and the greatest disturb- 
ances took place exactly at the same hours, at 7 a.m. 
and at 2 p.m. The phenomenon consisted in a current 
producing continuous attraction of the, armatures of 
the electro-magnets ; a galvanometer introduced into 
the circuit showed that the current changed its direction 
at varying intervals of time, of at least two minutes' 
duration. Towards 7 a.m. and 2 p.m. these currents 
were so strong that when the wire was isolated, and a 
conducting substance presented to it, it gave off vivid 
sparks. The currents manifested themselves in all 
directions ; they seem, however, to have been more 
marked on the lines which went from north to south. 
The longest wires always showed the greatest dis- 
turbances.' The same day telluric currents were also 
observed in the greater part of the two hemispheres, 
in Switzerland, in Germany, in the British Isles, in 
North America, and throughout Australia. In the 
United States, in particular, they were so strong that 
for about two hours it was possible to send messages 
from Boston to Portland, and vice versa without any 
battery, using only the telluric current. 

On May 30, 1869, during the aurora borealis 
which was visible from 7 to 9 p.m., Heer observed 
that out of the sixteen lines which terminated in the 


telegraphic office at Basle, six were almost useless 
during the two hours that the phenomenon lasted ; on 
the others- the telluric currents were not strong 
enough absolutely to interrupt communication. 

Similar coincidences were also observed during 
the auroras of April 5 and October 24, 1870 ; and 
the telluric currents attained an extraordinary de- 
velopment during the aurora of February 4, 1872, 
which we have mentioned as one of the most exten- 
sive known ; it was seen in the whole of the West of 
Asia, in the North of Africa, throughout Europe, and 
on the Atlantic as far as Florida and Greenland ; at 
the same time an aurora was observed in part of the 
southern hemisphere. The disturbances in telegraphic 
communication were not less extensive, and were 
observed with great care, in great part of Europe. In 
Paris they began on the lines directed eastwards, those 
to Germany and Austria, then on that to Switzerland. 
In Germany all the lines were affected, and com- 
munication was for a long time impossible between 
Cologne and London ; in that country the most 
marked perturbations were observed on the lines 
directed east and south-east. These currents were 
also observed in Italy and in Turkey, on the long 
line from Valona to Constantinople. At the same 
time many of the submarine cables were so affected 
as to prevent the transmission of any messages ; the 
disturbance was especially marked on. the line from 
Libbon to Gibraltar, on the Mediterranean cable, on 


the line from Suez to Aden, and from Aden to 
Bombay, and finally along the Transatlantic cable 
from Brest to Duxbury. 

Lastly, during the great aurora of November 17, 
1882, the telluric currents observed in England were, 
according to Preece, five times as strong as the 
current usually employed in telegraphy. Communi- 
cation was interrupted as long as the disturbance 

These examples will suffice to show the close rela- 
tion existing between polar auroras and telluric 
currents ; but it is not possible to go further and for- 
mulate this relation in precise terms. For, as a 
rule, telluric currents are observed in a very insuffi- 
cient manner, and only when they are sufficiently 
strong to hamper telegraphic communications. In 
some few observatories there has been an attempt to 
organise a regular study of these currents, but as a 
rule too short a line has been employed, so that no 
general law has yet been established as a result of 
these observations. 

There is reason to hope that this want will soon 
be supphed. The central meteorological office of 
France has lately organised at the Observatory of the 
Pare Saint-Maur, near Paris, a regular observation of 
the telluric currents, which will be prosecuted hence- 
forward at the same time as that of terrestrial magne- 
tism. Thanks to the valuable aid of the Adminstra- 
tion of the telegraph service three special lines have 


been constructed and reserved to this study ; one lies 
exactly north and south, from Eosny-sous-bois to 
Limeil, and has a length of 14,800 metres (ten 
miles) ; the second, which is the same length, lies 
from west to east, from Joinville-le-Pont to Croissy. 
The third line is a closed circuit embracing a little 
less than twelve square kilometres which corresponds 
to a diameter of about 3,900 metres (nearly two and 
a half miles). On these three lines at the Observa- 
tory are placed galvanometers, whose indications are 
registered photographically as in the case of the mag- 
netic instruments. These observations began in 
1893, and have already led to interesting results as 
to the relations which exist between telluric currents 
and magnetic perturbations. We quote these results 
from the notice published by M. Moureaux.' 

The variations of the telluric current of the line 
which lies from east to west are of the same kind as 
those of the horizontal factor in the terrestrial mag- 
netic force. The general appearance of the two 
curves is exactly the same. As M. Wild had already 
noted at Pavlovsk, a current from east to west cor- 
responds always to an increase in the horizontal 
factor, and inversely. The relation between the 
currents of the line from north to south and the 
variation in magnetic declination seems less simple ; 
the perturbations are indeed similar in extent in the 

' Annales du bureau central mitiorologique de Francepour 1893, 
vol. i. 


two curves, but the deviations are now in the same 
direction and now in opposite directions; yet a 
current from the north to the south generally corre- 
sponds to an increase of declination, and inversely. 

Airy's observations at Greenwich and Wild's at 
Pavolsk had seemed to indicate that telluric cur- 
rents always preceded by some minutes the cor- 
responding magnetic variations. This law is not 
always verified at Saint Maur; the currents often 
precede the magnetic variations by two or three 
minutes; but on the other hand the simultaneity 
of the two phenomena is often perfect. The question 
requires therefore further study. No aurora borealis 
has yet been observed in the neighbourhood of Paris 
since the study of the telluric currents has been regu- 
larly organised. 

If a relation of cause and effect is proved to exist 
between the aurora borealis and telluric currents it 
remains to be discovered which of the two phenomena 
is the cause of the other. We have just seen that 
there is an intimate relation between telluric currents 
and magnetic disturbance, so much so that it is 
probable that one of the two phenomena is the cause 
of the other, or that they are both dependent on some 
yet unknown cause. In our study of the relations 
of the aurora with magnetic perturbation we have 
shown that we cannot consider the latter to be depen- 
dent on the auroras, the contrary relation being the 
more probable one. It is therefore probable also that 


the magnetic perturbations or the telluric currents 
are the principal phenomenon which determines the 
production of auroras, or, at least, of those grea,t 
auroras which are visible in mean latitudes. This 
opinion has been advocated by Kuhn (1861) and 
Balfour Stewart (1869), among others; the latter 
compares the earth to the centre of a Euhmkorffs 
coil, of which the circuit is composed by the higher 
strata of the atmosphere. Electric movements are 
produced in these strata when terrestrial magnetism 
or the telluric currents undergo rapid variations. 
Now, as we have seen above, according to the obser- 
vations of Blavier during the polar aurora of 1859, 
telluric currents changed their direction alternately 
at frequent intervals, a condition eminently favour- 
able to the production of induction. It is therefore 
very probable that certain polar auroras at least are 
merely a secondary phenomenon, of which the imme- 
diate cause is to be found in telluric currents or in 
the perturbations of terrestrial magnetism. We shall 
return to this point when we come to discuss the 
theory of the polar aurora. 




Few phenomena have given rise to so great a number 
of hypotheses and theories as the polar aurora ; 
we find them already in Greek authors, from 
Anaxagoras, Anaximenes, and Aristotle, and it would 
be easy to fill a volume with the mere enumeration 
of these attempts at a theory, without discussing 
them. We will not therefore try to sketch the 
history of these opinions, but confine ourselves to a 
statement of the principal ones, and especially those 
which have had most influence on the study of the 
aurora. These theories may be classed under four 
heads : cosmic, optic, magnetic, and electric theories. 
1. Cosmic theories. — In the cosmic theories of the 
polar aurora this phenomenon is attributed to causes 
completely exterior to our globe. Of the numerous 
theories of this nature, the most famous is that of 
Mairan, who wrote his * Treatise ' on the aurora 
borealis, to which we have so often referred, to ex- 
pound and defend it. Mairan attributes the aurora 
to the zodiacal light, a whitish light like that of the 


Milky Way, which is seen in the heavens at certain 
seasons of the year, in the form of a long beam of 
light extended along the zodiac. The first serious 
study of this phenomenon was that of Cassini, begin- 
ning in 1683 ; his work was continued in the follow- 
ing century, notably by Mairan, and it was recognised 
that, according to all appearances, the zodiacal light 
is a very much flattened ring, formed of material 
particles, surrounding the solar equator. The radius 
of this ring varies with the season, is always very 
large, and may exceed that of the orbit of the earth. 

According to Mairan the aurora borealis is pro- 
duced when the earth comes in contact with the 
zodiacal light ; the matter of this zodiacal light, yield- 
ing to the attraction of the earth, falls into our 
atmosphere and is set on fire, ' either by itself, or by 
its collision with the particles of the air, or by the 
fermentation occasioned by its mixture with the air.' 
Starting from this hypothesis, Mairan explains in an 
ingenious manner the various appearances and the 
periods of the aurora borealis. 

This explanation appears to have been adopted at 
the time with enthusiasm. According to Fester, 
Mairan had ' lit a torch which illuminates the origin 
and the causes of this phenomenon.' In his treatise 
on meteorology (1774) Cotte speaks of ' the admirable 
agreement which exists between all the parts of this 
system and the result of the observations which the 
table of the aurora borealis presents to us.' 


Nevertheless, the theory of Mairan encountered 
from the first some resolute opponents, especially 
Euler and Lambert. A capital objection was early 
made, viz., that if the aurora borealis was produced 
by causes external to the earth it would present 
an apparent movement from east to west, like tlie 
other celestial bodies. An analysis of all the 
Bossekop observations led Bravais to the opposite 
conclusion ; not only the movement from east to west 
is not the prevailing one in the aurora borealis, but the 
inverse movement is the most frequent. So also the 
position of the earth in its orbit has no influence on 
the movements of the aurora. It must be added that 
the hypothesis of a cosmic origin renders no account 
of the regular daily variations which are observed in 
the forms of the aurora. ' These remarks,' concludes 
Bravais, ' appear to me destructive of any hypothesis 
which would attribute the aurora borealis to a cosmic 
matter originally foreign to our globe. How under 
this hypothesis can we account for the evident 
diurnal period which is followed by the forms of the 
aurora, and the absence of any similar period in its 
movements? How can we understand that the 
variation is found there where it should not exist, 
and is absent where it should on the contrary be 
found ? ' 

These objections finally dispose of all cosmic 
theories, and force us to see in the aurora borealis a 
purely terrestrial phenomenon. 


We must here note a singular coincidence which 
could not, of course, be known in Mairan's time, but 
which would have singularly increased the confidence 
which his theory inspired. We have seen that the 
light of the aurora is specially distinguished in the 
spectroscope by a brilliant yellowish green line, which 
has not yet been referred to any known body. Now 
this line is found also in the spectrum of the zodiacal 
light, as has been proved by Angstroem, Vogel, and 
Lockyer among others. We cannot thence conclude 
the identity of the two phenomena ; but if some day 
the source of the greenish-yellow Une of the aurora is 
discovered, it will be at the same time a precious 
indication of the constitution of the zodiacal light. 

Cosmic hypotheses have often been combined with 
other theories to explain the aurora ; we shall givd 
some examples of these in our examination of the 
magnetic theories. The objections which render the 
purely cosmic theories inacceptable evidently apply 
equally to mixed theories. 

Though it is impossible to admit that auroras are 
due to cosmic matter, coming from extra-terrestrial 
regions, it is on the other hand very probable that 
cosmic causes, foreign to our globe, may determine 
on our globe the production of auroras. We have 
dwelt at some length on the relations which exist 
between the sun spots on the one hand, and magnetic 
disturbance, telluric currents, and the aurora borealis 
on the other, and we have seen that these phenomena 


appear to obey the successive phases of solar activity. 
We shall see that the electric theory of the aurora 
accounts for these relations. But it is of interest 
to remark here that the same causes appear to act upon 
other, planets. The dark hemisphere of Venus has 
several times appeared to be illuminated, and Win- 
necke attributes to these faint illuminations a greyish 
violet tinge. This illumination has been observed in 
the years 1721, 1726, 1759, 1796, 1806, 1825, 18o5 
and 1871 ; now some of these years, notably 1726, 
1759, 1865, and especially 1871, were years of great 
auroras on the earth. If later observation confirms 
this correspondence in the two phenomena we shall 
have the right to regard the lights which are pro- 
duced on the planet Venus as true polar auroras, and 
a new argument will be added to all those which tend 
to show that the physical constitution of that planet 
resembles that of the earth. 

2. Optical theories. — The optical theories of the 
aurora are found in germ, in a passage which we have 
quoted from the * King's Mirror,' a work written in 
Norway towards the middle of the thirteenth century : 
* Some persons think that this light (the aurora) is a 
reflection of the fires which surround the seas to the 
north and to the south ; others say that it is the reflec- 
tion of the sun when it is below the horizon ; for my 
part I think that it is produced by the ice, which 
radiates by night the light which it has absorbed 
during the day.' 


One of these hypotheses, that which regards the 
aurora as the light of the sun reflected towards us 
by particles of ice, is evidently derived from the rela- 
tions which exist betwen the aurora borealis and 
certain cirrus and cirro-cumulus clouds. We have 
already dwelt upon these relations. This hypothesis 
has been maintained by a great number of authors, 
among whom are Descartes, Ellis, Frobesius, Hell, 
and in more modern times Sir John Franklin, Eoss, 
Easpail, and lastly, in 1873, Wolfert. It is clear, 
however, that this theory encounters capital ob- 
jections ; it attributes to the upper regions of the 
atmosphere a power of reflecting light out of all 
proportion with that which is revealed by the 
phenomena of twilight. Nor can the auroras be 
attributed to the reflection of the light of the sun from 
the particles of ice which compose the cirrus clouds, 
for we have seen that in the Arctic regions auroras are 
often produced at but little distance from the surface 
of the earth, a few miles or even less ; now it is very 
certain that in these regions, in winter, particles of 
ice cannot, at so low an elevation, be reached by the 
rays of the sun. A simple calculation shows that at 
the time of the winter solstice a point situated only in 
latitude 70° must, in order to receive the rays of the 
sun at mid-day, be at more than eleven kilometres 
above the surface of the earth (seven miles) ; at mid- 
night it must be as much as 2,400 kilometres (1,490 
miles). At the equinoxes, in order to be able to 


perceive in lat. 45°, and at midnight, the reflection of 
the sun's rays from particles of ice, these would have to 
be at a height of 2,600 kilometres (1,615 miles), which 
is manifestly impossible. Even admitting a series of 
successive reflections, the altitude would still be far 
too great, and it would be hard to understand how 
after all these reflections the light would have 
sufficient intensity. Finally, this theory offers no 
explanation of the incontestable relations which 
connect the production of the auroras with magnetic 
disturbances and telluric currents. We may add 
that the complete absence of polarisation of the light 
of the aurora borealis is a direct proof that this light 
has suffered no reflection. Lastly, if the light of the 
aurora were derived by reflection from that of the 
sun its spectrum would be continuous and marked by 
black lines, identical with the solar spectrum, or very 
similar to it. Now we have seen that the spectrum 
of the aurora is very different. • The absence of 
polarisation and the spectrum of the aurora are two 
characters which alone suffice to destroy absolutely 
the theory of reflection. 

Another explanation indicated vaguely in the last 
phrase of the passage from the ' King's Mirror,' which 
we quoted above, attributes the auroral lights to a sort 
of phosphorescence. This simple statement is insuf- 
ficient, for it would be necessary to show what is this 
substance which possesses, so extraordinary a phos- 
phorescence, and which has not been found in ice ; 


and then it would be necessary to show how, under 
this hypothesis, the periodicity of the auroras, their 
relation with terrestrial magnetism, &c., could be 
accounted for. This hypothesis must therefore be 
abandoned like the preceding ones. 

Yet it is possible that phosphorescence or rather 
fluorescence may play a certain part in the polar 
aurora, not as cause but as effect. 'We have said 
that the light of the aurora is characterised by a 
certain line in the spectrum of a greenish-yellow colour ; 
its nature is unknown, but numerous spectroscopists, 
especially Angstroem and Eand Capron, believe it to 
be produced by a phenomenon of phosphorescence or 
fluorescence. This phenomenon in any case is only 
accessory, and is due to a particular condition of the 
passage through the air of the electric discharges 
which constitute the polar aurora. 

3. Magnetic theories. — The theory known as mag- 
netic, of the aurora borealis, is far more satisfactory 
than any of the preceding ; it accounts better for the 
greater number of the phenomena, and has still a 
number of adherents, though it seems to us that it 
must yield to the electric theory. 

The magnetic theory dates at least from the 
famous astronomer Halley, who supposed (1716) that 
the aurora borealis was due to a ' magnetic vapour,' 
luminous per se. Independently of vagueness in 
statement, this hypothesis was not at first received 
with favour, because at that epoch electro-magnetism 


was still unknown, and experiments of the light- 
producing power of magnetic action had never been 
seen. The theory only took definite shape with 
Dalton (1793). After having collected and published 
a great number of observations of the aurora borealis, 
Dalton again showed the relations which existed 
between the aurora and terrestrial magnetism, 
discussed the different hypotheses on the nature of 
the aurora, and finally propounded the theory that 
the rays of the aurora are composed of ferruginous 
matter, magnetic in themselves, or else magnetised 
by the action of the earth. This dust, which takes 
its direction under the influence of terrestrial 
magnetism, with its north pole below (in the northern 
hemisphere) serves as a conductor to silent electric 
discharges between the upper strata of the atmo- 
sphere and the lower strata. Dalton concluded that it 
is not terrestrial magnetism which produces the 
auroras, but the latter which modify terrestrial 
magnetism and cause the perturbations. 

Dalton's ideas were revived by Biot (1820), who 
thought that the aurora boreahs might also be 
produced by the presence in the air of ferruginous 
particles by volcanic eruptions. Von Baumhauer 
(Utrecht, 1840) also supported the same opinions, 
but attributed the ferruginous particles not to 
volcanic eruptions of terrestrial origin, but to the 
fall upon our globe of cosmic, dust ; the light of the 
aurora would on this theory be produced by the 


incandescence of this dust when it entered the atmo- 
sphere, as in the case of meteors and falling stars. 
Among the most recent defenders of this theory, more 
or less modified, we may mention Denison Olmsted 
(1856), Foerster (1870), Zehfuss (1871), Toeppler 
(1872), and lastly Gronemann (1875). 

Among the arguments urged in favour of the 
magnetic theory is the existence on the soil of the 
Arctic regions of great quantities of ferruginous dust, 
and even of masses of meteoric iron. A rain of dust 
upon the earth has also been observed during several 
auroras, notably at Padua in 1834, and throughout 
northern Italy at the time of the great aurora of 1872. 
In mentioning these coincidences Toeppler also 
remarks that the presence round the moon of halos,; 
which as we have said sometimes occur during an 
aurora, may likewise be attributed to this meteoric 
dust. In supposing a cosmic, not a terrestrial, origin 
to this magnetic dust, the magnetic theory of the 
aurora is thus nearly identical with that of Mairan, 
since many authorities believe the zodiacial light to 
be formed of this cosmic dust. 

As a further proof in support of this magnetic 
theory it is also alleged that the lines in the spectrum 
of the aurora are somewhat near to some of those in 
the spectrum of iron. It is clear, too, that this 
hypothesis lends itself, in appearance at least, to the- 
explanation of the relfitions which exist between 
auroras and terrestrial magnetism. 


On the other hand, the magnetic theories encounter 
many objections. The last argument, drawn from 
the analogy of the lines in the spectrum of the aurora 
with those of iron, is far from being decisive ; the lines 
of the auroral spectrum are only near a very small 
number of those of iron, and the brightest lines of 
this metal are not found in the spectrum of the 
aurora. Most spectroscopists therefore think that 
the spectrum of the aurora cannot be attributed to 
iron, and that the former shows more affinity with 
the spectrum of electric sparks in very rarefied air. 

If an origin external to the earth is attributed to 
the ferruginous particles, which, according to the 
magnetic theory, constitute the aurora, we are con- 
fronted by the objections which we set forth previously 
when we dealt with the cosmic theories of the aurora. 
Moreover, on the hypothesis of dust from the inter- 
planetary spaces, it is hard to understand why the 
aurora should never manifest itself in the equatorial 
region, nor why its frequency should diminish rapidly 
within the maximum zone, towards the north pole. 
If, on the other hand, we return to the hypothesis of 
a purely terrestrial and volcanic origin for this dust, 
the cause of the diurnal and annual periods of the 
auroras remains obscure, and also of the difference 
in this respect between the regions which are within, 
and those which are without the zone of maximum 

With regard to the rain of dust which has once or 


twice been observed in Europe during an aurora, it 
can only be regarded as a cbance coincidence. No 
similar rain has yet been observed during an aurora 
by observers in high latitudes ; now it is especially in 
those regions, where the aurora is seen almost every 
night and is much nearer the earth, that frequent 
falls of ferruginous dust would be observed, v/ere there 
any relation between them and the production of 

Finally, it appears to us very difficult to admit 
that dust, even supposing it to be formed of pure iron, 
could exercise on the compass needle an influence 
capable of producing a deviation of several degrees, 
while it forms at the same time clouds so' transparent 
as to allow stars of the fourth magnitude to be seen 
through it. 

All these reasons taken together lead us to reject 
the magnetic theory as we have already rejected the 
preceding theories. 

4. Electric theories. — We now reach the electric 
theories, which are those in which we should seek for 
the true explanation of the aurora borealis. The first 
to refer the aurora borealis to a purely electric 
phenomenon appears to have been the physician 
Canton ; ' he pointed out in 1753 the close analogy 
which auroras offer with the light of electric discharges 
produced in very rarefied air. In his view the aurora 

' Canton was the first to discover and study the phenomena of 
Influence; he recognised also that a tube containing rarefied air 
becomes luminous when moved about near a charged conducting 


was but the form whicii storms take in polar 

These ideas were adopted successively by Priestley, 
Eberhard, Frisi, Pontoppidan, Benjamin Franklin, 
&c., but without making much progress. A very 
similar opinion was advocated by Fisher in 1834 ; his 
theory was that auroras are a phenomenon of electric 
discharge due to the positive electrisation of the 
atmosphere ; they are produced at the moment when 
the electric equilibrium is re-established between the 
atmosphere and the earth, by the intermediary of 
particles of ice, which are imperfect conductors 
floating in the air, and serve to bring down to earth 
the electricity of the upper regions of the atmosphere. 
In the equatorial regions these particles of ice do not 
exist sufficiently near the earth ; electric equilibrium 
can there only be re-established by storms. 

Dove assigns to the auroras of mean latitudes 
their true origin, supposing them to be produced by 
magnetic disturbances of the interior of the earth ; 
for, he says, that which can put the needle in move- 
ment over a wide extent of territory may also produce 
brilliant projections of light when the magnetic 
disturbance of the earth 'reaches its extreme degree. 
This explanation is the more remarkable that it 
preceded the discovery made in 1831 by Faraday of 
the currents of induction produced by the displacement 
or the variations of magnets. 

Then followed the studies of A. de la Eive, which 
for a moment were believed to supply a complete 


explanation of the phenomenon. He supposed that 
auroras were produced by the positive electricity 
which, in the upper regions of the atmosphere, is 
transported by the trade winds from the equator 
towards the poles. Arrived at the polar regions, this 
electricity accumulates and attracts below it the 
negative electricity of the earth. There would thus be 
a species of condensation, and from time to time dis- 
charges in the form of auroras, when the tension of 
the two electricities attained to sufficient values. De 
la Eive conceived in 1862 an apparatus which would 
produce luminous appearances analogous to those of 
the aurora. In this apparatus, which is described in 
most treatises on physics, a bar of soft iron which 
rests at one end on a powerful electro-magnet is en- 
closed in an electric case in which the air can be much 
rarefied ; the bar is surrounded, except at the two 
ends, with an envelope of glass, and the spark of a 
powerful Euhmkorff's coil is passed between the 
summit and the base of the bar. In these conditions 
a beam of light is obtained between these two points 
which plays round the bar of iron, and recalls in form 
and colour certain aspects of the auroras with rays. 
We do not insist on this experiment, since it requires 
conditions which evidently do not obtain in the 
atmosphere ; a true explanation of the phenomenon 
cannot therefore be found in it. The same holds 
good of the beautiful appearances, also resembling 
auroras, which Gaston Plante obtained with his 



powerful secondary battery, when the negative elec- 
trode is plunged into a vessel filled with brine, and the 
positive electrode is brought close to the damp walls 
of the same vessel. 

Lemstroem ^ invented another experiment which 
gives results much nearer to the aurora borealis both 
in general appearance and probably also in mode of 
production,' An insulated metallic ball, armed with 
a few points, communicates with one of the poles of 
a Holtz machine, of which the other pole is connected 
with the earth. At a certain distance from this ball, 
and opposite to one of the points, are placed some 
Geissler tubes, of which the further ends are also 
placed on the ground, while those nearer to the ball 
are insulated. As soon as the Holtz machine is set 
in motion the Geissler tubes are illuminated ; under 
favourable circumstances and with a good electric 
machine this illumination takes place when the tubes 
are as much as two yards away from the ball. The 
passage of the electricity, which is not shown by any 
light between the ball and the tubes, that is in air at 
the ordinary .pressure, is thus quite sufficient to light 
up the very rarefied air contained in the Geissler 
tubes. Of all the experiments hitherto attempted in 
the way of reproducing artificially the effects of the 
aurora borealis, this is certainly the one which most 
nearly approaches the natural phenomenon. 

Another theory, more complete than any of the 

' Archives des Sciences physiques et naturelles, 1875, vol. liv. 


preceding, was proposed a few years ago by Edlund.' 
We shall give it at some length, in spite of some 
objections which have been pointed out from the 
point of view of physics, because this theory, with some 
modification's and additions, seems to us to explain in 
the most satisfactory manner the different properties 
oi the aurora borealis. 

Edlund takes as his point of departure the 
phenomena known as unipolar induction, which 
were discovered by W. Weber, and which he himself 
has studied very thoroughly. This is the name given 
to those currents which arise in each half of a metallic 
sheath which surrounds a magnet when the sheath 
is rapidly revolved round the magnet. To show the 
production of these currents it is enough to apply 
two metal springs to the revolving sheath ; the one 
should be placed opposite one of the poles, the other 
opposite the neutral line of the magnet ; then these 
two springs must be connected by a circuit containing 
a galvanometer. The currents are produced in the 
same way, whether the magnet remains motionless or 
is dragged along in the same movement of rotation as 
the sheath which surrounds it. 

It is known that the general phenomena of mag- 
netism can be explained on the hypothesis that the 
earth contains a magnet with two poles. The earth, 
being a relatively good conductor of electricity and 

' B. Edlund, ' Eecherches sur I'lnduotion Unipolaire, l'Eleotrioit6 
AtmosphSrique et I'Aurore Bor^ale ' {Actes de I'Acadimie des Sciences 
de Suide, vol. xvi., Stockholm, 1878). 


animated by a movement of rotation, is thus similar 
to the sheath of which we spoke above, and conse- 
quently the phenomena of unipolar induction should 
be produced in it. 

We will suppose, to simplify the question, that 
the axis of the terrestrial magnet coincides with the 
axis of the earth's rotation, or, in other words, that 
the magnetic poles do not differ from the geographical 
poles. We know that this is not so, but we shall 
see later what modifications this actual difference 
produces in the facts. In calculating first on this 
simple hypothesis all the circumstances of unipolar 
induction, Edlund shows that a molecule charged with 
positive electricity, taken on the surface of the earth, 
is subjected to two forces — the one vertical, from below 
upwards, which tends to drive this molecule upwards 
into the air, following the direction of the radius of 
the earth ; the other perpendicular to the first, directed 
along the meridian and, in each hemisphere, tending 
to draw the molecule towards the nearest pole. The 
first force is at its maximum at the equator and nil 
at the poles ; the other, on the contrary, is nil at the 
equator and increases with the latitude,- then diminishes 
and becomes nil again at the poles. The resultant of 
these forces is at each point of the earth situated in 
the meridian, and perpendicular to the direction of 
the magnetic dipping needle. 

Under the influence of these forces the electrified 
molecules leave the surface of the earth to rise in the 


atmosphere, and this effect is produced especially in 
the equatorial regions where the force is greatest. 
Electricity is thus accumulated in the higher regions 
of the atmosphere, and this is in agreement with the 
observed fact that the electric potential increases with 
the altitude. Now it is known, and other works of 
Edlund have contributed to the sum of knowledge on 
the subject, that very rarefied gases are good con- 
ductors of electricity ; the fancied resistance of a 
vacuum is due to the difficulty which electricity experi- 
ences in leaving the electrode, not in traversing the 
surrounding medium. When it has reached a suffi- 
cient height in the atmosphere, the electricity will find 
strata which offer little resistance, and consequently it 
will be able to obey without difficulty the forces which 
attract it towards the polar regions. 

In order to descend to the earth again this 
electricity has two courses open to it : either disrup- 
tive discharges through the air, — the storms of the 
equatorial and mean latitudes ; or slow discharges in 
the form of continuous currents which are produced 
in high latitudes ; these are the polar auroras. These 
continuous currents might be produced at the pole 
itself, since at that point the vertical force is nil ; 
but as a general rule the electricity of the atmosphere 
will re-enter the earth long before it reaches the 
pole, provided that it follows the direction of the 
magnetic dipping needle, because, as we have seen 
above, the resultant of the forces which act on the 


electrified molecules is perpendicular to tliis direction. 
In order to flow towards the earth, following this 
direction, in a given latitude, the electricity has only 
to overcome the resistance of the air. Now the 
quantity of electricity accumulated in the atmosphere, 
and consequently its tension, increases with the 
latitude ; at a given moment then, the tension 
having become very great, the electricity of the 
upper regions of the atmosphere will flow downwards 
towards the earth in currents which follow the 
direction of the magnetic dipping needle; this flow 
will occur by preference in regions where, as a conse- 
quence of particular meteorological conditions, tem- 
perature, humidity, &c., the conductivity of the air is 
greatest. On the hypothesis of the symmetry of all 
the phenomena round the geographical pole, this 
flow of electricity would be produced in a zone of 
which the centre would be the pole. 

In reality the poles of the terrestrial magnet do 
not coincide, as we supposed, with the axis on which 
the earth rotates. The magnetic pole of the northern 
hemisphere is in latitude 73°, and in longitude 98° 
(from Paris) ; but this only complicates the calcula- 
tion a little, and hardly modifies the general con- 
clusions. The tangential force, which we found to be 
nil at the geographical pole, is in reality nil neither 
at the geographical nor at the magnetic pole, but at a 
point situated between the two. The annular zone 
in which the auroras most frequently occur is hot a 


circle of which the centre is the geographical pole, 
but takes an oval form and cuts the meridian which 
passes through the magnetic pole at a much lower 
latitude on the side of the Atlantic than on the 
opposite side. This shows a remarkable agreement 
with the results of observation of the form and posi- 
tion of the zone of the maximum frequency of the 
aurora borealis. 

Omitting the general phenomena of atmospheric 
electricity, which are also in agreement with Edlund's 
theory, and concerning ourselves solely with the 
aurora borealis, it will be seen that this theory 
explains satisfactorily : 

1. The direction of the rays of the aurora. 

2. The existence, the form, and position of the 
zone of maximum frequency. 

3. The deviation of the summit of the arc from 
the magnetic meridian. For, by allowing for the 
geographical position, and the magnetic declination of 
a given locality, and also for the form and situation 
of the maximum of electric density, the theory of 
Edlund permits us to calculate the deviation of the 
summit of the arc from the magnetic meridian. Thus 
at Bossekop and at Abo this deviation should be 
about ten degrees to the west, while the summit of 
the auroral arc should approach the magnetic 
meridian much more nearly in North America and in 
Siberia. These results are in perfect agreement with 
the observed facts (see page 124). 


4. The accidental deviations which may be 
produced if, as a result of particular meteorological 
conditions, the resistance of the air becomes much 
less in a direction different to that of the magnetic 
needle, along which the flow of electricity should 
normally proceed. 

5. Finally, it will be seen that if this theory does 
not explain directly the annual and diurnal variations 
of the aurora, it at least allows us to foresee that the 
explanation may be connected with this theory, after 
a study of the periodic changes in the conductivity 
of the air resulting from the variations of the different 
meteorological elements. 

We will conclude our review of the theories to 
which the aurora borealis has given birth by a sketch 
of the most recent of them all, that of J. Unterweger.' 

The starting point of this theory is purely hypo- 
thetical, and is not susceptible of verification ; but 
the results to which it leads appear to agree with a 
great number of the observed facts ; it deserves 
mention, therefore, in spite of its hypothetical 
character, among the other general theories of the 
aurora borealis. 

It is known that the sun is not fixed in space, but 
that it moves with a velocity of about thirty-three 
miles a second towards a point situated in the con- 

' J. Unterweger, ' Beitrage zur Erklarung der ooamisch-terrestri- 
Bohen Erscheinung ; fiber das Polarlioht ' (Denksclwiften der Akdd. 
der Wissenschaften, vol. 1., Vienna, 1885). 


stellation of Hercules. All the planets are implicated 
in this movement, so that the earth, instead of 
describing a closed ellipse, of which the sun occupies 
one of the foci, really moves on a sort of elliptical 
helix traced on a cylinder of which the axis is the 
path of the sun through space. As the plane of the 
earth's orbit cuts this axis obliquely, the absolute 
velocity of the earth through space presents a regular 
annual variation ; it is greatest towards the middle of 
March (about forty-four miles a second), and least 
towards the middle of September (about thirty miles 
a second). 

On the other hand, in order to explain the propa- 
gation of heat and light, science has been constrained 
to suppose the existence of an imponderable but 
elastic medium, ether, which transmits the vibrations 
of heat and light. This ether fills all the celestial 
spaces and also material bodies. 

Starting from these data Unterweger supposes 
that the cosmic ether, that is to say, that which fills 
the celestial spaces, when it is met by the earth in its 
movement, of which we have just indicated the nature, 
is compressed or condensed in front of the earth in 
the direction of its movement, and dilated or rarefied, 
on the contrary, behind it. Thus the cosmic ether 
in advance of the earth would be more condensed 
than that which our globe bears along with it, and it 
would be more rarefied behind. If we admit, moreover, 
that the condensed ether has a positive electric potential 


with regard to rarefied ether, it results that that half 
of the earth which presents itself first in its movement 
through space, and which comprehends the greater 
part of the northern hemisphere, will be negatively 
electrified with regard to the regions of space towards 
which it is directed ; in the same way the half of the 
earth which is behind, and which comprehends the 
greater part of the southern hemisphere, will be 
electrified positively with regard to the regions of 
space which it is leaving. 

By means of his electrical apparatus Lemstroem 
has shown (see page 116) that in Lapland the terres- 
trial current at a certain distance from the earth is 
directed from above downwards, from the upper 
regions towards the earth ; this fact, on the interpre- 
tation of which we made certain criticisms, appears 
to agree with Unterweger's hypothesis. But this 
same hypothesis indicates that the terrestrial current 
should show a different direction in the southern 
hemisphere; experiments similar to those of Lem- 
stroem repeated in high austral latitudes, at Cape 
Horn or on Kerguelen Island, for instance, are of 
capital importance for the confirmation of this theory. 

From calculations based on the rapidity of the move- 
ment of the earth, and of the inclination of the axis to 
the plane of the orbit, Unterweger finds that the electri- 
sation of the northern hemisphere should be at its 
maximum in September, and at its minimum in March. 
The sum of the days of aurora and of the days of storm 


in many parts of our hemisphere presents this same 
annual variation, maximum in October, minimum in 
March, and this appears to Unterweger to be a first 
confirmation of his theory. It must be remarked that 
the auroras taken alone and independently of storms 
do not follow the same law, and that their frequency 
has each year, at least in most countries, two maxima 
— in spring and autumn. 

Unterweger explains the diurnal variation of the 
aurora (p. 80) by adding to his original hypothesis 
a second, viz. that the sun has a positive electrical 
potential with regard to the earth. The action of the 
sun thus modifies the distribution of electricity in the 
higher regions of the atmosphere. In calculating this 
action, it is shown that instead of being distributed 
equally over all parts of a zone of the same latitude, 
the electricity leaves in part that portion of the zone 
which is turned towards the sun for that which is in 
shadow ; in this latter portion the electricity is not 
distributed uniformly, but is found especially towards 
the west. The result is that auroras should be more 
frequent during the first hours of the night, and that 
over the whole earth, and this law is confirmed by 

The same reasons explain also the displacement of 
latitude presented in the course of the year by the 
zone of maximum frequency. We have just seen that 
under the repelling action of solar electricity the elec- 
tricity of the upper strata of the atmosphere accumu- 


lates especially on the side opposed to the sun, in that 
portion which is in shadow. Now the region of shadow 
has the widest surface at the equator, and narrows 
with the increase of latitude ; the tension of the elec- 
tricity spread over this region increases in proportion 
as the surface over which it can spread itself dimi- 
nishes, and is at its maximum near the summit of the 
region of shadow. In calculating the position of this 
summit at each season, Unterweger finds that the maxi- 
mum of electrisation, and consequently the maximum 
of auroras, is situated in latitude 88° at the winter 
solstice, in latitude 55° at the summer solstice, and in 
latitude 78° at the equinoxes. 

The relation of the aurora with the solar spots is 
explained by the supposition that the appearance of 
the spots coincides with a variation of the electrical 
potential of the sun. Finally, the relation of the 
aurora with terrestrial magnetism is as easy to under- 
stand on this theory as on any other electrical theory. 

In conclusion, the hypotheses of Unterweger ap- 
pear to explain better than Edlund's theory the annual 
variation, and especially the diurnal variation of the 
aurora ; but on the other hand they render account 
with much less ease of a number of important phe- 
nomena, such as the direction of the arcs and of the 
rays, the oval form of the zone of maximum frequency, 
the deviation of the arc from the magnetic meridian, &c. 

If Edlund's theory is not established at all points, 
nor free from objections on physical grounds, that of 


Unterweger rests on no experimental basis; it is a 
tissue of hypotheses — admissible, no doubt — but of 
which none is proved, and probably never will be 
proved. To be preferred to that of Edlund, it should 
explain better than it does a greater number of the 
phenomena, which is not the case — at least, until 
Unterweger's theory has been further elaborated. 

It seems to us, therefore, that of all the theories 
which we have set forth the most satisfactory in its 
general features is that of Edlund. It is that which 
should be retained, at any rate, for the present, and 
in its main features, and with certain restrictions. 
For this theory, which explains in a very simple man- 
ner the characters proper to the auroras of the polar 
regions, is less satisfactory with regard to the auroras 
of immense extent which are seen simultaneously in 
the two hemispheres over more than two-thirds of the 
surface of the globe. It is not clear why, on this 
theory, there should be a coincidence between the two 
hemispheres. It is well to recall in this connection 
what we have already said more than once, that it 
seems to us that the name of aurora is given in com- 
mon to two very different phenomena. 

According to this view the ordinary aurora of the 
polar regions, those, for example, which were observed 
80 continuously by the French Commission at Bossekop 
and by Nordenskioeld during the wintering of the 
' Vega,' constitute a first group of phenomena, which 
seem to us to be almost completely explained by 


Edlund's theory. The auroras of this class are in 
general limited to the polar regions, and are only 
exceptionally seen in lower latitudes. They are local 
phenomena, which have a tendency to appear in oval 
zones, of which, the centre, as indicated in Edlund's 
theory, lies between the geographical and magnetic 
poles. These auroras constitute the regular return 
to the earth of the electricity which in lower latitudes 
has been driven by unipolar induction into the higher 
regions of the atmosphere. It is easy to understand 
that this regular flow, which is moreover of no great 
intensity, should have no influence on the needle of 
the compass. These auroras are seen now at one 
point, and now at another of the auroral zone, at a 
lower or a higher latitude, according as the conduc- 
tivity of the air varies with meteorological conditions, 
temperature, humidity, &c. If there be a stratum of 
cloud formed of particles of ice, this stratum will form 
a conductor, and this explains the intimate relations 
which we have noted between clouds and auroras 
(chap. iv. para. 2). Finally, the same theory explains 
the contrast in the variations of the frequency of the 
auroras presented by mean and polar latitudes (p. 98). 
For if the electricity of the upper strata of the 
atmosphere finds in mean latitudes favourable condi- 
tions for returning to the earth, it will flow downwards 
before arriving in high latitudes, and the frequency of 
the aurora, increasing in mean latitudes, will diminish 
by just so much in polar latitudes, because the elec- 


tricity will have disappeared without reaching them. 
In order to elucidate completely the conditions in 
which these auroras are produced, it is necessary to 
discover whether they present any relation with the 
vertical movements of the atmosphere, whether, for 
example, their position has any relation with the 
centres of high and low pressure. But in these re- 
searches attention should be directed exclusively to 
these auroras of the first class, eliminating all the 
auroras of the second class — of which we will treat 
presently — and which, as they are seen simultaneously 
in the two hemispheres, or at least over a wide extent 
of territory, have clearly no connection with meteoro- 
logical conditions. It would he of capital importance 
also to organise regular observations of atmospheric 
electricity, taken at a large number of stations under 
conditions which should be strictly comparable, so as 
to study the variations in the electrical potential of 
the atmosphere according to the latitude, a phenome- 
non about which we possess at present no data. 

A second class of auroras, . entirely different, in 
our opinion, from the first, comprehends the very 
extensive auroras which are produced simultaneously 
over a vast space, and often, if not always, in both 
hemispheres. By far the greater number of auroras 
seen in mean latitudes belong to this class, and they 
are always accompanied by marked magnetic dis- 
turbances and telluric currents. In our view, these 
auroras do not come under Edlund's theory, but should 


be considered as a phenomenon of induction produced 
by the telluric currents or by magnetic perturbation. 
We have already indicated, in the chapter on the rela- 
tions of the aurora with terrestrial magnetism and 
telluric currents, the principal reasons on which this 
opinion is based. It seems very natural to admit that 
any sudden interruption of the magnetic or electrical 
equilibrium of the globe should be accompanied by 
corresponding electrical movements in the electrified 
strata which form the upper regions of the atmosphere. 
Laboratory experiments with Geissler's tubes show 
us, moreover, that these tubes grow suddenly luminous 
whenever the electric field in which they are placed 
changes abruptly. Auroras of the second class are, 
on this theory, but the reflection in the upper regions 
of the atmosphere of modifications of the magnetic 
state of the earth; instead of producing these per- 
turbations, they are, on the contrary, produced by 
them. Moreover, they would always have their seat 
at a great altitude, there where the air has a degree 
of rarefaction comparable to that of Geissler's tubes, 
that is to say, at a height of thirty or forty miles ; 
whereas the auroras of the first class may occur much 
lower, and even quite close to the surface of the earth ; 
this also accords with the results of observation. 

Magnetic disturbance and telluric currents having 
a known relation with the spots on the sun, it becomes 
clear that it will be the same with auroras of the second 
class, without the need of seeking a direct relation 


between this last phenomenon and the spots on the 

In conclusion, the considerations which we have 
just set forth account satisfactorily for the principal 
phenomena of the aurora borealis ; and with regard 
to those which they do not directly explain, such as 
the diurnal and annual variation, they indicate the 
direction in which the explanation should be sought. 

Among the capital points in regard to which there 
is still considerable uncertainty we may mention 
especially the spectroscopic study of the light of the 
aurora. Doubtless it may he regarded as more than 
probable that auroras are produced by electrical dis- 
charges in very rarefied air ; but laboratory study of 
the spectra of the electric spark in gases has not 
hitherto been able to discover all the lines of the 
aurora, and notably the principal one, that which is 
most characteristic of the phenomenon. These studies 
should be renewed, the conditions of the experiment 
being varied as much as possible. Whenever the 
spectrum of the aurora boreaHs is artificially repro- 
duced, not only one of the remaining obscure features 
in this phenomenon will be elucidated, but we shall 
obtain at the same time most valuable information as 
to the composition and properties of the upper regions 
of the air. 


BELOW LAT. 55° FROM 1700 TO 1890. 

This catalogue is taken, as far as the year 1872, from the 
general catalogue published by Hermann Fritz, ^ which is a 
summary of all previous catalogues. We have confined ourselves 
to the appearances of the aurora boreaUs in Europe, and below 
the 55th degree of latitude. Beyond this limit, especially 
towards the north of Norway, the aurora is so frequent that, 
during certain periods, it may be seen every day ; it is then, as 
a rule, a purely local phenomenon. 

Hermann Fritz's catalogue ends in the early months of 1872 ; 
we have prolonged it to the end of 1890, using the official pub- 
lications of the meteorological observatories of the following 
countries: Spain, Italy, Prance, England, Holland, Belgium, 
Germany, Bavaria, Saxony, Austria, Hungary, Eussia. We have 
also searched the weekly or monthly periodicals which are 
devoted, partially or entirely, to meteorology. 

Fritz gave, in his catalogue, a brief indication of the source 
of each observation. We have omitted this, for the sake of 
brevity ; it may be found in the original when required. 

It is probable that, with every care, this catalogue is still 
incomplete. Many faint auroras altogether escape observation. 
It is especially after fine auroras, when attention has been 
directed to this phenomenon, that observers note faint auroral 
lights, of which the recorded number is at first very great, and 
then dwindles rapidly as observation tires. The continual 
increase of street lighting in towns is another cause of the failure 
to notice the fainter manifestations of the aurora. Besides 
these sources of error it may be that some few auroras which 
have reaUy been observed are omitted in this catalogue. We 
shall be grateful to any one who will supply the omissions. 

' Verzeichniss heobachteter Polarlichter, Wien, 1873. 


In the following catalogue we indicate, after each date, the 
localities where an aurora borealis has been noticed. Where 
the name of a country is given instead of that of a town, it 
signifies that an aurora has really been observed in that country 
but without precise indication of the place or places. A query 
after a date, without other indication, signifies that the author 
responsible for the information has mentioned an aurora borealis 
under that date, but without naming the country where the 
observation was made. The query after the name of a country 
indicates that the observation is doubtful, the phenomenon 
being undefined. Finally, when an aurora borealis was observed 
at the same date in different localities, we have grouped these 
localities according to country, and always, as far as possible, 
in the same order. A comma separates locaUties belonging to 
the same region; a semicolon those belonging to different 

1704. Nov. 3. Canton of Zurich. 

1705. April 19. Zurich. 

1706. Sept. or Oct. Upminster (England). 

1707. Mar. 1. Berlin, Schoenberg (Altmark, Saxony).— 6th. 

Berlin, Schoenberg, Schneeberg. 

— Aug. 5. Breslau. — 6th. Breslau. 

— Oct. 19. Schoenberg (traces of an aurora). — 20th. 

Schoenberg -(traces of an aurora). — 21st. 
Berlin, Schoenberg. — 26th. Schoenberg. — 
29th. Berlin. 

— Nov. 6. Berhn ; Ireland.— 27th. (?) Upminster. 

1708. Aug. 9. Hereford.— 10th. Hereford.— 20th. London. 

— Sept. 11. Jena, Halle, Leipzig, Naumburg. 

1709. Oct. 18. Durham.— (?) (towards the end of the month.) 

Hoi stein. 

1710. Nov. 26. Giessen, Leipzig. 

1715. Mar. 17. Elbing and district (western Prussia). 

1716. Mar. 15. London (very brilliant aurora) ; Ukraine. — 

16th. Utrecht ; Brandenburg, Dantzig. — 
17th. A very widely extended aurora, visible 
throughout Spain, Portugal, Italy, France, 
England, Switzerland, the Low Countries, 
Austria, Hungary, Germany, Sweden, Bussia, 
North America. — 24th. Switzerland ; London, 

— April 10. Wittenberg (Saxony). — 11th. Paris, Valincour, 

Dieppe ; London, Dublin. — 12th. Paris ; Lon- 
don, Dublin, Cotterstock ; Dantzig. — 20th, 
21st, 22nd, 23rd, 24th. Dantzig. 

— Nov. 16. Neuchatel (Svritzerland). 


1716. Dec. 15. Paris.— 16th. Paris. 

1717. Jan. 6. 9, 10, 11. Paris. 

— Feb. 2. Berlin.— 16th. Sutton-at-Hone (England). 

— Mar. 30. Eoohester. 

— April 10. London, Sutton-at-Hone ; Wittenberg, Berlin. 

— Aug. 10. Hungary, Silesia ; Poland ; Prussia. — 25th, 

26th, 27th. Milan.— 31st. Berlm. 

— Sept. 8, 20. Berlin. 

— ■ Oct. 15. Paris, Berlin. 

1718. Jan. 25. Silesia, Massel. 

— Feb. 21. Keichstadt ; Bohemia ; Silesia ; County of 


— Mar. 4. Paris ; Berlin, Breslau.— 10th. Zurich— 19th. 

Berlin. — 22nd. Bohemia. 

— May 1. Berlin. 

— Sept. 16. Paris; Lynn Begis; Berhn. — 17th, 22nd, 

24th. Lynn Eegis. 

— Oct. 22. Keichstadt; Bohemia. — 23rd. Paris. 

— Nov. 23. Paris; Brandenburg. — 25th. Berlin. 

— Dec. 6. Berlin, Glogau, Breslau, Eisenberg. — 18th. 

Paris.— 20th. Germany.— 30th. Berlin ; 
Mecklenburg ; Hanover ; Hadeln ; Lynn 

1719. Feb. 11. Berlin.— 12th, 13th. Massel. 

— Mar. 23. South of France ;' Norfolk.- 24th. (?) Mont- 

aaban (perhaps a confusion with the aurora 
of the 23rd.).— 30th. Paris; Neuchatel 
(Switzerland) ; London ; France ; Belgium ; 

— AprU 7. Paris; Norfolk.— 17th. Paris. 

— Sept. 22, 24. England. — 25th. Lithuania. 

— Oct. 16. Berlin, Beichstadt, Magdeburg. — 18th. Reich- 

stadt.— 22nd. England.— 23rd. Halle. 

— Nov, 3. Breda ; Beichstadt. — 6th. Massel, Lausitz, 

Breda ; Norfolk, Gruwys-Morchard. — 8th. 
Berlin. — 11th. Magdeburg. — 13th. Berlin, 
Beichstadt ; the whole of Saxony ; Holland. 
—14th. Nordhausen.— 16th. (?) —19th. (?) 
— ^20th. Berhn, Lausitz, Magdeburg;, Lon- 
don, Norfolk, Cruwys - Morchard. — 21st. 
Wittenberg ; Utrechli, Breda ; London, 
Streatham, Dublin, Cruwys-Morchard. — 
28th. Luzm. 

— Deo. 5. Breda ; Dublui. — 7th. England. — 18th. Guhr. 

—22nd. The whole of Hungary, Bohemia ; 
Streatham. — 30th. (?) — (?) Auroras were 


observed in Paris by Maraldi in November and 
December ; the precise dates are unknown. 

1720. Jan. 2. Berlin.— 3rd. CEdenburg (Hungary). 

— Feb. 6. Paris, Orleans; Brandenburg. — ^lOth. Paris; 

Brandenburg. — 11th. Paris ; Lynn Eegis ; 
Luzin. — 12th. Eouen. — 15th. Berlin. — 18th. 
Paris ; Brandenburg. 

— Mar. 9. Paris.— 11th, 23rd. (?) 

— Apr. 7, 11. (?) 

— Sept. 10. Paris. — 28th. London, Lynn Eegis. 

— Oct. 22. (?)— 27th. Niirenberg. 

— Nov. 6, 7, 20, 25. (?)— 29th. Paris ; Marsel. 

— Deo. 2. Corsica. — 3rd. Upminster. — 6th. Saxony. — 

20th. Paris. 

1721. Jan. 1. (?) — 17th. Paris ; Lynn Begis ; Giessen. — 

22nd. Paris. — 23rd. Lynn Eegis. 

— Feb. 11. (?)— 17th. Paris, Saint Malo, Eiom ; Cruwys- 

Morchard ; Switzerland ; throughout Ger- 
many. — 18th. Warsaw. — 22nd. Paris. — 
23rd. Paris ; Nuremberg ; Hungary. — 26th. 
Lehotta ; Paris. — 28th. Augersburg, Dantzig. 

— Mar. 1. Paris, Eennes, Saint Malo; Nimeguen; Zurich; 

throughout Germany ; Warsaw. — 9th. 
Cracow. — 18th. Stuttgart. 

— May 28. Berlin. 

— Aug. 15. Paris. 

— Sept. 16. Giessen. — 22nd. Paris ; Lynn Eegis ; Nurem- 

berg ; Weimar ; Magdeburg. — 28th. (?) 

— Oct. 12. Luzin ; Dresden ; Poland. — 13th. Luzin ; 

Dresden, Poland. — 20th. Nuremberg. — 21st. 
Paris ; Magdeburg. 

— Nov. 12. Dresden. — 13th. Luzin. — 28th. Warsaw. 

1722. Jan. 7. Paris. — 8th. Paris. — 9th. Paris. — 11th. 

Nuremberg. — 12th. Paris ; Nuremberg. — 
14th. Nuremberg, Breslau.— 17th. (?)— 
23rd. (?)— 31st. Berlin. 

— Feb. 12. Seehausen, near Magdeburg. — 13th, 16th, 

Seehausen. — 20th. Paris. 

— Mar. 1. Dantzig ; Koenigsberg. — 6th. Kcenigsberg, 

Augersburg. — 7th. Nuremberg ; Breslan. 
— 9th. (?)— 16th. Nuremberg. — 24th, 
Limbach, near Dresden. — 27th. Berlin. — 
29th. (?) 

— May 12. Lcebau.— 24th. Janer (Silesia). 

— Sept. 5. Paris; Oschatz (Saxony). — 6th. Paris; Oschatz, 

Striegau, Naumburg; Seehausen. — 7th. 


Seehausen. — 10th. Paris.— 12th. (?)— 16th. 
Paris, London, Lynn Begis. — 17th. Berhn. 
—18th. Berlin.— 22nd. (?) 

1722. Oct. 3. Limbach, Seehausen; Berlin. — 7th. Berlin. 

—8th, 9th, 10th. Seehausen.— 14th. Paris; 
Lynn Eegia ; Seehausen. — 15th. Lynn ' 
Eegis; Seehausen. 

— Nov. 3. Seehausen.— 9th. (?)— 11th. Giessen.— 12th, 

13th. Limbach. — 22nd. Dantzig.— 23rd. 

— Deo. 1. Limbach. — 4th. Seehausen. — 7th. Berlin. — 

31st. Bologna. 

1723. Jan. 1. Nuremberg. — 3rd. Bologna, Paris, Lynn Begis, 

Seehausen. Twice also during this month 
auroras were observed at Limbach (near 
Dresden), but the dates are not given. 

Paris. — :27th. Giessen. 

Lynn Begis. — 3rd. Berlin. — 10th. Breslau. — 
25th. Paris. — 26th. Lynn Eegis. 

Paris, Berlin. 

Jauer (?). — 31st. Lynn Begis. 

Jauer. — 17th. Jauer. 

Lynn Begis, Lajbau, Lausitz, Saxony. 

Paris, Saxony. — 5th. (?). 

Paris. — 7th. Jauer. 

1724. Jan. 17. Nuremberg. — 29th. Lemberg, Loebau 30th. 

Central Europe. 

Eawicz (Posen). 
Jauer. — 22nd. Lcebau. 
Aug. 4, 12, 17, 24, 31. Central Europe. 

— Sept. 9, 22, 23. Central Europe. 

— Dec. 26. Central Europe. 

Auroras were frequently observed Sit Paris by 
Maraldi durmg the spring and autumn of 
1724, at micertain dates ; they were fainter 
than those of the previous year, and showed 
a uniform light. 

1725. Jan. 8. Silesia, Lausitz, Seehausen. — 9th. Paris, Silesia, 

Lausitz, Seehausen, Berlin. — 12th. Lcebau, 
Silesia, Lausitz. — 13th. Loebau, Silesia, Lau- 
sitz, Berlin. 

— Feb. 12. Berlin. 

— Mar. 16. Berhn. 

— April 24. Berlin. 

— Aug. 22. Berlin (traces of an aurora). 

— Sept. 16. (?) 





















1725 Oct. 2. Seehausen. — 5th. Castle Dobbs (Ireland), Si- 
lesia, Lausitz, Jauer, Lcebau, Seehausen, 
Berlin. — 6th. Paris, Castle Dobbs. — 7th. 
Lynn Eegis, Silesia, Lansitz, Loebau, Bres- 
lau, Berlin, Bawicz, Poland. — 8th. Silesia, 
Lausitz, Seehausen. — 9th. Silesia, Lausitz, 
Loebau.— 14th, 15th. (?) 

— Deo. 4. Dantzig. — 5th, 6th, 7th. Dantzig, Silesia, Lau- 

sitz, Germany. — 12th. (?). — 17th. Ksesmark. 
—25th (?). 

1726. Jan. 8. (?). 

— Feb. 6. Loebau. 

— Mar. 6. Berlin. — 17th. Coasts of Spain. — 24th. Nurem- 

berg.— 28th. Berhn. 

— April 2. Berlin. — 23rd. Upminster. 

— Sept. 5. Loebau.^-26th. Paris, BreuiUepont (Eure). — 

27th. BreuiUepont. — 28th. Jauer. 

— Oct. 9. District of Brandenburg.— 10th. (?).— 14th. 

Paris, Lyim Eegis. — 15th. Lynn Eegis. — 
19th. Portugal, Cadiz, the whole of Italy ; of 
Switzerland; of France; of England; Brus- 
sels, Li^ge ; the whole of Germany. — 20th, 
21st. Helmstsedt. — 22nd. Dantzig. 

— Nov. 4. Provence. — 6th. Lynn Eegis. 

— Deo. 1. Germany ; Loebau, Eismark, Seehausen, Wit- 

tenberg, &o.— 7th. (?).— 16th. MontpeUier. 
— 18th, Versailles ; Geneva ; Nuremberg ; 
Berlin. — 28rd. Berlin. 

1727. Jan. 15. Giessen ; Durkheim (Hardt) ; Petworth. — 16th. 

Neuch&tel (Switzerland), Liverpool, Lanca- 
shire. — 17th. Paris. 

— Feb. 9, 11. Utrecht.— 13th. Bologna, Utrecht. 

— Mar. 11. Italy.— 13th. France, Petworth.— 14th. Bo- 

logna, Paris, Petworth, Liverpool, Lynn 
Eegis, Kaesmark. — 15th. Germany.— 16th. 
Bologna, Lynn Eegis. — 17th, 18th, 19th, 
20th. Bologna.— 29th. Italy. 

— April 8. Loebau, Nuremberg. — 14th. Frankfurt on the 

Oder. — 14th. Germany. 
-- May 13. Bologna. 

— Aug. 1. ' Loebau. — 22Dd. Koenigsberg (?), Germany. — 

27th. KcEnigsberg (?), North Germany. 

— Sept. 9. Loebau. 

— Oct. 13. Germany. — 14th. Paris, Loebau. — 17th. Bo- 

logna, Germany. — 18th. Bologna. — 19th. 
Paris, Wittenberg. — 20th. Wittenberg. 


1727. Nov. 6. Germany. 

Numerous auroras were observed by Maraldi 
during the spring, autumn, and winter of 
1737 ; the most remarkable are given above, 
under their dates. 

1728. Jan. 3. Bologna.— 19th. (?). 

— Feb. 7. Utrecht — 9th. Utrecht, Loebau.— 11th. Utrecht. 

— 13th. Paris, Utrecht, BerUn.— 21st, 23rd. 
Utrecht.— 26th, 29th. Loebau. 

— Mar. 1. Utrecht. — 8th. Plymouth. — 20th. Utrecht, 

Kaesmark. — 26th, 27th. England.— 29th. 
Germany, Loebau.- 30th. Utrecht. — 31st. 

— April 2. Bologna, Windsor, Plymouth, Utrecht, Tesohen, 

Dantzig. — 3rd. Plymouth. — 4th. Wittenberg. 
—9th. Italy, Utrecht.— 12th. Utrecht. 

— May — . (?).— 30th. Bologna. 

— June — . Germany. — 20th. Wittenberg. — 25th. Berlin, 

Wittenberg. — 29th. Paris, Wittenberg. 

— July — . Utrecht. — 13th. Bologna, Plymouth, Berlin. — 

15th. Plymouth.— 16th. Paris, Utrecht.- 
28th. Plymouth. 

— Aug. 2, 29. Paris, Plymouth.— SOth. Loebau.— 31st. Ply- 

mouth, Utrecht. 

— Sept. 15. Paris, Utrecht.— 17th. Berlin.— 26th. Italy.— 

29th. Germany.— 30th. Utrecht. 

— Oct. 2. Bologna, Breuillepont, Upminster, Utrecht, 

Zurich, Loebau. — ith. Germany. — 7th. 
Utrecht, Berlin, Loebau, Wittenberg. — 12th. 
Plymouth, Utrecht.— 14th, 20th. Loebau.— 
24th. Windsor, Eodbridge (near Southamp- 
ton).— 25th, 26th. Plymouth,— 29th. Utrecht. 
—30th. Italy, Utrecht. 

— Nov. 2. Plymouth, Utrecht, Wittenberg. — 4th. Utrecht. 

—8th. Germany.— 11th, 12th. (?).— 13th. 
Utrecht, Berlin. — 23rd. Windsor, Utrecht. — 
24th. (?). 

— Dec. 2. Bologna.— 3rd. Plymouth.— 4th, 14th. Ger- 

Auroras frec[uently observed in Paris by 
Maraldi in all seasons of 1728. 
1729. Jan. 17. Paris, Plymouth, Loebau. — 18th. Luzin, Ka- 
wicz. — 20th, 24th. Germany. 

— Feb. 3, 11, 16. Loebau.— 17th. Germany.— 18th. (?).— 

25th. Loebau. 

— Mar. 2. Loebau.— 27th. Utrecht, Lceban.— 28th. Utrecht. 


1729. April 6. Loebau.— 19th. Germany.— 22nd. Plymouth.— 

30th. Loebau. 

— May 1. Loebau. — ^2nd, 17th. Plymouth. — 22nd. Loebau. 

— 29th. Paris, Loebau. — 81st. Helmstsedt. 

— June 15, 26. Paris. 

— July 7. (?). 

— Sept. 15. Paris.— 23rd. Plymouth.— 26th, 29th. (?). 

— Oct. 2. (?).— 11th. Loebau. — 13th. Paris.— 16th. Loebau. 

—21st. Utrecht.— 22nd. (?).-24th Loebau. 
—25th. Plymouth. 

— Nov. 16. Paris, Plymouth, Utrecht, Nimeguen, Leipzig, 

Wittenberg, Lcebau, Halle, Hehnstaedt, Ber- 
lin, &c. (nearly all Germany). — 17th. Paris, 
Loebau, "Warsaw. — 19th. Brussels, Nime- 
guen, Loebau. 

— Dec. 17, 18. Loebau. 

1730. Jan. 8. Wittenberg.— 9th. Paris —16th. Loebau. 

— Feb. 4. Paris. — 5th, 7th. Loebau. —9th. Loebau.— 11th, 

13th. (?). — 15th. Bome, Florence, Bologna, 
all the south of France (Provence, Langue- 
doc), Paris, Utrecht, Zurich, Geneva, Berne, 
Eperies (Hungary), Loebau, Brieg (Silesia), 
Warsaw. — 16th. Loebau, Brieg (Silesia), 
Warsaw.— 17th. Lcebau.— 20th. (?). 

— Mar. 3. Bologna. — 6th. Bologna, B^ziers, Toulouse, 

France, Plymouth, Utrecht, Germany. — 7th. 
Toulouse. — 8th. (?). — 9th. Loebau, Germany. 
— 11th. Bologna. — 13th. Eome, Bologna. — • 
15th. Bome. — 16th. Loebau. — 18th. Bologna. 
20th. Plymouth.— 21st. Bologna.— 28th. (?). 

— April 12. Loebau. — 13th. Germany. — 16th. Italy, Bel- 

gium, Lausitz. — 20th. Germany, Bologna. 

— May 9. Loebau. 

— June 5. Zurich. — 21st. Bologna, Germany. 

— July 5, 6. Loebau, Germany. — 17th, 19th. Germany. — 

21st. Ksesmark. 

— Sept. 8. Plymouth.— 10th. Utrecht.— 11th. Italy .—28th. 

Loebau, Wittenberg. — 30th. HaUe, Helm- 

— Oct. 4. Loebau.— 5th. Wittenberg, Halle.— 6th. Wit- 

tenberg. — 7th. Toulouse, South of France, 
Paris, Plymouth, Wittenberg, Helmstsedt, 
HaUe, Lcebau.— 8th. Berlin. — 9th. Poiotiers, 
Paris, Breuillepont, Picardy, Frankfurt-am- 
Main, Wittenberg, Berlin. — 11th. Helmstsedt, 


Germany. — 13th. Berlin. — 20th. Wittenberg, 
Hebnstaedt, Loebau. — 21st. Loebau. — 22nd. 
Germany. — 26th. Geneva, Neuchatel, Boetter- 
kinden, Zurich, Loebau, Germany. 

1730. Nov. 2. Paris, Vienne (Dauphine), Geneva, Neuchatel, 

Zurich, Loebau, Helmstaedt, Berlin, Branden- 
burg, Dresden. — 3rd. France, Helmstaedt. — 
4th. Helmstaedt, Loebau. — 5th. Utrecht, 
Helmstffidt, Loebau. — 6th. Utrecht, Loebau. 
— 7th, 8th. Helmstffidt. — 19th. Loebau. — 
25th. (?).— 28th. Germany. 
Auroras were seen in Hungary towards the end 
of the month. 

— Dec. 8, 16, 22, 25. Loebau.— 28th. Jaroslaw.— 29th. Lis- 

bon, Elvas, Campo Maior, Evora, and other 
parts of Portugal. — 31st. Warsaw. 

1731. Feb. 10. Bologna. 

— Mar. 2. Plymouth.— 7tb. Utrecht. 

— April 3, 13. Utrecht.- 27th, 29th. (?). 

— May 7. Plymouth.— 14th. Utrecht. 

— Aug. 22. Plymouth.— 28th, 31st. Wittenberg. 

— Sept. 24. Plymouth.— 26th. BreuiUepont, Berlin.— 27th, 

28th, 29th, 30th. BreuiUepont. 

— Oct. 2. BreuiUepont, Utrecht, Altorf (Bavaria). — 3rd, 

BreuiUepont, Utrecht, Berlin, Helmstaedt, 
— 4th. BreuUlepont, BerUn, Heknstsedt, Hil 
desheim, and to the south of the Danube 
- — 8th. BreuiUepont, Plymouth, Utrecht 
Nuremberg, Giessen, Helmstaedt, Wittenberg, 
Hildesheim, Brandenbxirg. — 10th. Witten 
berg, Helmstaedt.- 24th, 25th, 26th. BreuUle 
pont. — 29th. Helmstaedt. 

— Nov. 6. Utrecht.— 11th. Helmstaedt.— 30th. Utrecht. 

— Dec. 30. Plymouth. 

1732. Jan. 26. Wittenberg. — 28th. Paris and neighbourhood. 

—29th. Plymouth. 

— Feb. 2, 4, 5. Paris and neighbourhood. — 7th. Witten- 

berg. — 15th. Paris and neighbourhood. — 
18th. Plymouth.— 20th, 21st. Germany. — 
26th. Italy.— 29th. Paris ; Wittenberg. 

— Mar. 1. Paris. — 2nd, 10th. Paris and neighbourhood. 

— 14th, 18th. Germany. — 21st. Utrecht, 
Berlin, Helmstaedt, Wittenberg. — 22Dd. 
Germany. — 23rd. Paris and neighbourhood. 
— 24th. Italy. — 26th. Paris and neigh- 


bourhood. — 27th. Utrecht ; Helmstaedt. — 
28th. Paris and neighbourhood. 

1732. April 3, 14, 16, 17. Paris and neighbourhood. — 24th. 

Wittenberg, Beriin.— 23rd, 26th, 27th. Paris 
and neighbourhood. 

— May 12, 14, 19, 20, 23, 25, 26. Paris and neighbourhood. 

—27th, 28th, 30th. Utrecht. 

— June 25. Heknstsedt. — 26th. Paris ;'Helmstasdt. 

— July 12. Meudon (near Paris). — 17th. Paris and neigh- 

bourhood.— 21st. Italy.— 29th, 30th. Paris 
and neighbourhood. 

— Aug. 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, 21. Paris and neighbourhood. — 

22nd. Paris, Utrecht, Altorf (Bavaria), 
"Wittenberg, Berlin, Dantzig. — 23rd. Coburg. 

— Sept. 1, Paris. — 5th. Paris and neighbourhood. — 10th. 

Breuillepont, Wittenberg, Berlin. — 11th, 
16th. Paris and neighbourhood. — 19th, 20th, 
21st. Paris, BreuiUepont.— 23rd, 24th, 25th. 
Germany. — 27th. Breuillepont ; Utrecht ; 

— Oct. 1, 2, 3. Breuillepont. — 5th. Paris, Breuillepont ; 

Berlin. — 6th. 14th. Breuillepont. — 20th. 
Breuillepont. — 22nd. Paris ; Utrecht ; Berlin. 
— 23rd. Paris, Breuillepont ; Utrecht, 
Helmstsedt ; Wittenberg, Berlin. — 24th, 
25 th, 26th. Breuillepont. 

— Nov. 4. BreuiUepont. — ^9th. Paris. — 10th. Utrecht. — 

12th. Utrecht, Germany. — 19th. Utrecht. — 
20th. Italy, Utrecht, Germany. — 21st. 

— Dec. 4, 13. Neighbourhood of Paris. 

1733. Jan. 19. Paris and neighbourhood. 

— Feb. 13. Plymouth.— 14th, 16th. Neighbourhood of 


— Mar. 3. Bremen, Berlin. — 8th, 9th, 13th. 'Neighbour- 

hood of Paris. 

— April 1. Plymouth.— 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 

10th, 12th. Neighbourhood of Paris.— 13th. 
Neighbourhood of Paris, Landshut (Silesia.) 
—18th, 19th. Utrecht.— 22nd. (?) 

— May 4. Utrecht. — 6th. Neighbourhood of Paris. — 7th. 

Utrecht. — 9th. Neighboiirhood of Paris, 
Utrecht, Wittenberg — 17th. Utrecht. 

— June 20. Neighbourhood of Paris. 

— July 7. Italy, Plymouth, Leipzig; Wittenberg, Berlin. 

—8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 


15th. Neighbourhood of Paris. — 21st. Paris, 
Plymouth. — 22iid. Paris. 

1733. Aug. 3, 4. Paris. — 5th, 6th. Neighbourhood of Paris. — 

7th. Paris.— 8th, 9th, 14th. Neighbourhood 
of Paris.— 17th, 19th, (?).— 29th. Neighbour- 
hood of Paris. 

— Sept. 2, 3. Neighbourhood of Paris. — 5th. Utrecht. — 6th. 

Neighbourhood of Paris; Utrecht. — 19th. 
Plymouth. — 27th. Breuillepont. 

— Oct. 2. Breuillepont, — 3rd. Breuillepont ; Berlin. — 4th, 

5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th. BreuiUepont.— 10th. 
Paris, Breuillepont; Utrecht. — 16th, 28th, 
30th, 31st. Breuillepont. 

— Nov. 7. Paris ; Plymouth ; Wittenberg, Berlin. — 8th, 

12th, 13th, 23rd, 24th. Paris. 

— Dec. 8. Paris, Plymouth. — 9th. Paris. — 10th. Paris, 

Plymouth.— 22nd. Berlm.— 2Brd. Utrecht. 
—27th, 30th. Paris. 

1734. Jan. 8. Neighbourhood of Paris (?).-9th. Servian, 

near B^ziers. 

— Feb. 2. Wittenberg. — 3rd. Paris; Utrecht: Berlin, 

Wittenberg. — 18th. Neighbourhood of Paris. 
— 22nd. Paris, Bayeux. — 26th. Neighbour- 
hood of Paris. 

— Mar. 1. Berlin. — 8th. Neighbourhood of Paris. — 22nd. 

Utrecht.— 25th, 26th (?).— 28th, 30th, 31st. 
NeighboTtthood of Paris (it was not possible 
to determine whether the phenomenon 
observed v?as an aurora borealis, or the 
zodiacal light). 

— Apr. 2, 4. Paris (doubtful). — 5th. Neighbourhood of 

Paris. — 7th. Neighbourhood of Paris, 
Utrecht.— 8th. Paris; Utrecht.— 9th. 
Utrecht ; Wittenberg. — 10th. Bologna. — 
22nd. Potsdam. 

— May 1, 4, 5, 6. Utrecht. — 24th. Neighbourhood of Paris ; 

Utrecht.— 25th, 26th. Plymouth; Utrecht. 
—27th, 28th, 29th, 30th, 31st. Utrecht. 

— June 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 24. Utrecht. 

— July 2. Paris.— 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th. Utrecht. 

— Aug. 6, 7, 8. Utrecht.— 20th. Wittenberg.— 23rd, 24th, 

25th, 26th, 30th. Paris and neighbourhood. 
— 31st. Paris. 

— Sept. 5, 10. Utrecht. — 19th. Nointet (near Beaumont), 

Altorf (Bavaria) ; Berlin. — 20th. Paris, 
Nointet; Plymouth.— 21st. Utrecht.— 28rd. 


Nointet ; Berlin.— 25th. Utrecht.— 27th. 
Nointet.— 29th. Paris ; Utrecht. 

1734. Oct. 1, 2, 5, 6. Utrecht.— 10th. Nointet.— 14th. Utrecht. 

—19th, 21st, 23rd, 25th, 26th, 27th, 28th, 
29th. Neighbourhood of Paris. — 30th. Paris. 

— Nov. 14, 15, 17, 2a. Neighbourhood of Paris. 

— Dec. 19. Utrecht.— 25th. Paris, Bouen; Utrecht.— 27th. 


1735. Jan. 23. Utrecht.— 25th. Berlin.— 26th. Utrecht; 

Berlin, Wittenberg. 

— Feb. 11. Utrecht.— 21st. Italy.— 22. Italy; Paris; 

Utrecht ; Berlin, Wittenberg.— 23rd. 

— Mar. 1. Utrecht. — 2nd. Utrecht ; Brandenburg. — 13th, 

15th. Berlin.— 16th, 17th, 19th. Utrecht.— 
20th. Haarlem ; Germany. — 22nd. Utrecht ; 
Wittenberg. — 23rd. Utrecht, Haarlem ; 
BerUn. — 24th. England; Utrecht; Witten- 
berg; BerHn; Brandenburg. — 25th. Italy; 
Utrecht; Wittenberg.— 26th, 27th, 28th, 
29th, 30th, 31st. Utrecht 

— Apr. 20. Utrecht. — 22nd. Utrecht ; Potsdam, Verden. — 

23rd. Utrecht, Haarlem ; Berlin, Potsdam, 
Brandenburg.— 25th (?) 

— May 14, 17, 18, 19, 22. Utrecht. 

— June 9, 10, 11, 13, 14. Utrecht. 

— July 2, 3, 8, 10. Utrecht. — 17th. Utrecht, Haarlem. 

— Aug. 6, 9, 12, 19, 20, 21, 23. Haarlem.— 31st. Plymouth. 

— Sept. 24. Woodford, near London. 

— Oct. 14. Plymouth.— 15th. London, Plymouth.— 22nd. 

London. — 23rd. Plymouth ; Verden. — 24th. 
Utrecht.— 25th. Wittenberg. 

— Nov. 10,11. Utrecht.— 14th. Utrecht; Wittenberg.— 

18th. Verden. 

— Dec. 8. Verden.— 11th. Utrecht.— 13th, 15th. Verden. 

1736. Jan. 22. London ; Utrecht. — 31st. Utrecht. 

— Feb. 2. Utrecht.- 9th. Brandenburg.— 17th. Ply- 

mouth ; Altorf.— 18th. Plymouth.— 27 ih. 

— Mar. 1. Plymouth.— 3rd. Utrecht,— 15th. Italy; 

Utrecht ; Brandenburg. — 21st. Branden- 

— April 3. Utrecht. — 5th. Utrecht ; Wittenberg, Branden- 

burg. — 11th. Utrecht. — 14th. London ; 
Utrecht.— 27th. Utrecht. 

— May 4. Bologna.— 6th, 11th, 14th, 15th, 27th. Utrecht. 


1736. June 1, 2, 23, 24, 29, 30. Utrecht. 

— July 7, 8. Italy.— 25th. Utrecht. 

— Aug. 12. Berlin.— 13th. Utrecht. 

— Sept. 3. Utrecht, Berhn, Wittenberg. — 4th. Berlin, 

Wittenberg. — 5th, 9th. Plymouth ; Utrecht. 
—17th. Berlin.— 25th. Bologna ; Sheffield ; 
Utrecht.— 28th. Utrecht.— 29th. Utrecht; 
Brandenburg. — 30th. Italy. 

— Oct. 1, 4, 6. Utrecht.— 7th. Plymouth ; Utrecht ; Bran- 

denburg. — 8th. Plymouth. — 10th. Utrecht ; 
Berlin, Wittenberg.— 11th, 12th. Utrecht.— 
20th. Utrecht ; Brandenburg. — 22nd. Ooburg. 
—25th. Paris; Utrecht; Berlin. — 26th. 
Coburg ; Wittenberg ; Brandenburg. — 27th. 
Sheffield ; Utrecht ; Coburg ; Wittenberg ; 
Brandenburg. — 28th. Utrecht ; Coburg ; 
Silesia ; Pomerania. — 29th. Sheffield ; 
Utrecht ; Coburg. — 80th. Utrecht ; Coburg. 
—31st. Utrecht. 

— Nov. 1. Utrecht.— 6th. Berlin. — 7th. Plymouth ; 

Utrecht.— 8th. Utrecht ; Berlin.— 9th, (?).— 
10th, 11th, 12th. Utrecht.— 18th. Plymouth ; 
Utrecht.— 19th. Plymouth; Berlin.— 20th, 
21st. Utrecht.— 24th. Plymouth; Utrecht; 
Coburg. — 25th, 26th. Utrecht. — 29th. 

— Deo. 15, 18. Utrecht.— 22nd. Paris.— 29th, 30th. Utrecht. 

1737. Jan. 1. Italy.— 4th. Utrecht; Berlin.- 19th. Utrecht. 

—20th. Utrecht; Berhn.— 21st. Paris.— 
24th. Bologna.— 29th, 30th, 31st. Utrecht. 

— Feb. 2, 20, 28. Utrecht. 

— Mar. 1,4, 8. Utrecht.— 18th. Plymouth.— 21st. Shef- 

field. — 28th. Berlui, Wittenberg. — 29th. 
Plymouth ; Wittenberg. 

— April 7. Wittenberg. 

— May 3. Utrecht. 

— June 1. Bologna.— 4th, 5th, 17th, 18th, 28rd, 24th. 

Utrecht.— 30th. Bologna. 

— July 26. Utrecht. 

— Aug. 20. Berlin, _ Wittenberg; Brandenburg. — 21st. 

Italy'; Plymouth ; Utrecht ; Wittenberg.— 
22nd. Plymouth; Utrecht; Berlin.— 23rd. 
Plymouth ; Berlin, Brandenburg. — 24th. 
Berlin.— 25th. Italy; Berlin.— 26th, 27th, 
28th. Utrecht. 
Sept. 13. Sheffield; Bohemia.— 17th, 19th. Utrecht.— 


22na. Brandenburg; Goslar.— 27th, 28th, 
30th. Sheffield. 

1737. Oct. 1. Sheffield; Utrecht.— 2nd. Sheffield.— 17th, 

18th. Utrecht. — 23rd. Brandenburg.— 
24th, 25th. Sheffield.— 30th. Utrecht. 

— Nov. 12. Plymouth; Brandenburg. — 16th. Dantzig. — 

i8th. Plymouth.— 19th, 20th. Utrecht; 
Berlin.— 26th. Wittenberg. 

— Dec. 5, Utrecht. — 15th. Utrecht ; - Coburg. — 16th. 

Lisbon; Eome, Bologna, Florence, Ravenna, 
Arimini, Venice, Paris, England, Utrecht, 
Vienna, Saxe, Meissen, Annaberg, Sohnee- 
berg, Wittenberg, Helmstaedt, Berlin, Duis- 
burg, Brandenburg, Dantzig, Pologne. — 18th. 
Utrecht.— 19th, (?) 21st, 22nd. Italy.— 24t.h, 
Arimini. — 26th. Utrecht. — 28th. Italy. 
Utrecht, Coburg. 

1738. Jan. 3. Brandenburg.— 25th. Plymouth; Utreoht.— 

26th. Utrecht. 

— Feb. 8, 12. Utrecht.- 16th. Italy.— 18th, 19th, 24th, 

26th. Utrecht. 

— Mar. 11, 17. Utrecht.— 18th. Sheffield ; Utrecht.— 21st, 

22nd, 23rd, 26th. Utrecht. 

— April 10. Sheffield.— 13th. Utrecht.— 16th. Plymouth. 

—18th, 21st. Utrecht. 

— May 9, 12, 13, 15. Utrecht. 

— June 5, 8, 16, 17, 23. Utrecht. 

— July 10. Utrecht.— 11th. Italy.— 16th, 21st. Utrecht. 

— Aug. 7. Utrecht. — 13th. Bologna. 

— Sept. 16. Utrecht; Berlin. 

— Oct. 6, 12, 17, 18. Utrecht. 

— Nov. 1. Plymouth.— 4th. Plymouth; Utrecht.— 5th. 

Plymouth.— 7th. Plymouth; Utrecht. 

— Dec. 4. Wittenberg.— 31st. Utrecht. 

1739. Jan. 8, (?)— 27th. Helmatsedt. 

— Feb. 1. Utrecht.— 13th or 14th. Helmstaedt.- 15th. 

Sheffield.— 17th. Helmstffidt.— 27th. Helm- 
staedt ; Brandenburg. 

— Mar. 6. Sheffield, Plymouth.— 7th. Sheffield.- 10th. 

Bologna, Utrecht.— 11th. Utrecht.— 12th. 
Sheffield, Pljmiouth, Utrecht, Helmstaedt. — 
13th, 20th. Utrecht.— 22nd. Helmstaedt.— 
26th. Plymouth.— 28th. Utrecht.— 29th. 
Bologna, Padua, London, Chelsea, Utrecht, 
Helmstaedt, Brandenburg. 


1739 AprU 2. Berlin. — 5th. Utrecht. — 10th. Plymouth; 
Wittenberg.— 14th, 15th, 19th. Utrecht.- 
24th. Berlin.— 29th. Utrecht. 

— May 1. Plymouth, Utrecht, Brandenburg. — 2nd, 3rd, 

4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th. 

— June 2. Bologna ; Utrecht. — 5th, 23rd. Utrecht. 

— July 6, 7, 12, 15, 28, 31. Utrecht. 

— Aug. 1, 6, 7, 10, 12, 13, 28. Utrecht. 

— Sept. 1, 8, 10. Utrecht. — 14th, Dantzig. — 23rd, Ply- 

mouth ; Utrecht. — 24th, Sheffield, Plymouth ; 
Utrecht ; Brandenburg.— 25th, 26th. Shef- 
field.— 28th. Utrecht; "Wittenberg.— 29th, 
30th. Sheffield. 

— Oct. 3, 9, 24, 25. Utrecht.— 29th, (?)— 30th, Plymouth. 

— 31st. Wittenberg, Brandenburg. 

— Nov. 2. Sheffield.- 16th. Italy.— 2l8t. Utrecht.— 23rd. 


— Deo. 6. Sheffield. 

1740. Jan. 12. (?).— 27th. Eome.— 30th. Utrecht. 

— Feb. 22. Plymouth. 

— Mar. 23. Plymouth; Utrecht. — 24th, 25th. Plymouth. 

— 28th. Hornburg near Halberstadt. 

— June 7. Plymouth. 

— Oct. 17. Sheffield. 

— Nov. 3. Saint-Port.— 18th. (?) 

1741. Jan. 13. Italy. — 20th. Utrecht. — 22nd. Utrecht ; 

Brandenburg. — 23rd. Utrecht ; Schneeberg, 

— Feb. 3,6. Utrecht. — 21st. Brandenburg. 

— Mar. 4. (?).— 5. Sheffield.— 6th. (?).— 11th, Sheffield; 

Utrecht. — 12th, 18th. Utrecht. — 16th. 
Plymouth, Sheffield ; Utrecht ; Brandenburg, 
—17th. Sheffield.— 20th. Sheffield, Ply- 
mouth.— 21st, (?).— 29th. Utrecht. 

— April 1. Plymouth.— 6th. (?).— 9th, 16th, Utrecht.— 

17th, (?).— 30th. Utrecht. 

— May 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 30th. Utrecht. 

— July 10, 23. Plymouth. 

— Aug. 10. Utrecht; Brandenburg. — 13th. Utrecht; Wit- 

tenberg.— 20th, 22nd, 31st. Utrecht, 

— Sept. 1, 3, 4, 12, 19, 20. Utrecht. 

— Oct. 1. (?). — 2nd. Plymouth; Utrecht; Brandenburg. 

—3rd, 4th, 5th. (?).— 8th. Bologna; Ply- 
mouth ; Utrecht ; Brandenburg ; Wolfsburg 


(LimeboTirg). — 9th. Bologna ; Wolfsbiirg. — 
13th, 14th, 15th, 28th. Utrecht. 
1741 Nov. 2. Utrecht; Wittenberg.— 8th. (?).— 9th. "Wit- 
tenberg. — 12th, 28th. Utrecht. 

— Dec. 14. (?). 

1742. Jan. 2. (?).— 13th, 14th, 23rd. Utrecht.— 26th. Bran- 

denburg.— 29th. Utrecht ; Berlin. 

— Feb. 7. Dantzig.— 12th, 13th. Utrecht.— 23rd. Berlin. 

—25th. Wittenberg. 

— Mar. 8. Plymouth; Wittenb6rg.—7th,8th. Delft.— 13th. 

Utrecht. — 16th, 17th. Plymouth. — 26th, 
27th. Plymouth; Berlin.— 28th. Utrecht. 

— April 2, 3. Utrecht. — 4th. Plymouth.— 8th, 10th, 24th, 

29th, 30th. Utrecht. 

— May 23. Wittenberg. 

— Aug. 26, 30. Wittenberg. 

— Sept. 7. (?).— 10th. Wittenberg. 

— Oct. 9, 22, 23. (?).— 27th. Utrecht. 

— Dec. 22, 26. Wittenberg.— 28th. Utrecht. 

1743. Jan. 1, 3. Utrecht.— 23rd. Plymouth.— 30th. Witten- 


— Feb. 19. Berlin. 

— Mar. 7. Gorlitz, Berlin, Breslau, and probably Dantzig. 

—16th. Wittenberg. — 19th. Plymouth ; 
Utrecht; Berlin, Dantzig, Zwanenburg. — 
20th. Utrecht; Wittenberg.— 24th. Italy; 
Utrecht.— 26th. Utrecht ; Wittenberg.— 
30th. Utrecht. 

— April 12. Plymouth. 

— July 9. Plymouth. 

— Aug. 9. Utrecht; Zwanenburg.— 12th. Utrecht. 

— Sept. 2. (?).— 8th, 9th, 18th. Utrecht.— 19th. Witten- 

berg.— 29th. (?). 

— Oct. 7. Utrecht.— 8th. Wittenberg.— 25th. Zwanen- 

burg; (?).— 29th, 31st. (?). 

1744. Mar. 4. Berhn.— 19th. The whole of Lithuania. 

— April 2. Plymouth; Utrecht; Wittenberg, Berlin, Dant- 

zig, Zwanenburg. — 5th, 13th, 17th. Utrecht. 

— May 5, 16, 27. Utrecht. 

— July 16, 17. Utrecht. 

— Oct. 3. Bologna. 

— Nov. 11. (?).— 25th. Tubingen. 

— Dec. 3. Glarus.— 25th. Plymouth.— 29th. Tubingen. 

1745. Jan. 4. Plymouth.— 10th. Utrecht.— 18th. Stuttgart, 

Tubingen. — 21st. Wittenberg ; Berlin. 

— Feb. 4, 8. Utrecht.— 17th. Stiiblau, Fiirstenwerder.— 


lath. (?).— 20th. Plymouth.— (?). Ply. 
mouth (date not given). 
1745 April 18, 19, 28. Utrecht. 

— May 19, 30. Utrecht. 

— Aug. 2. Utrecht. 

— Oct. 9, 17. Italy.— 31st. Berlin. 

1746. Jan. 12. Zwanenburg.— 26th. Utrecht.— 31st. Tu- 


— Feb. 4. Tiibingen.— 20th. Plymouth.— 23rd. Berg am 

Irchel (canton of Zurich). — 26th. Utrecht. 

— Mar. 10. Plymouth.— 19th. Utrecht.— 25th. Plymouth, 

Utrecht, Zwanenburg. — 26th. Utrecht. 

— April 20, 21. Utrecht. 

— May 7, 12, 16, 17, 26. Utrecht. 

— July 14, 20, 22. Utrecht. 

— Aug. 20, 21, 25. Utrecht. 

— Sept. 21. Berlin (?). 

— Oct. 13. Schneeburg.— 18th. Plymouth.— 19th. Dantzig. 

— 22nd. Utrecht, Tiibmgen.— 23rd, 24th. 
Tiibingen.— 26th, 28th. Tubingen, Bern- 

— Nov. 10. Tubingen, Bernhausen. — 17th. Wittenberg. — 

20th. Tubingen, Bernhausen. 

— Dec. 7, 18, 24. Tubingen, Bernhausen. 

1747. Jan. 6. Utrecht, Zwanenburg. — 8th. Plymouth, 

Utrecht.- 9th, 10th, 11th. Utrecht.— 13th. 
Plymouth. — 22nd. Tubingen. 

— Feb. 1,7. Utrecht.— 13th. Ttibrngen.- 16th. Utrecht. 

— Mar. 10. Zwanenburg.— 17th. Zwanenburg, Berlin. — 

26th. Tubingen. 

— April 2. Plymouth, Utrecht.— 3rd, 5th. Utrecht.— 8th. 

Tubingen.— 9th, 10th, 18th, 29th, 30th. 

— May 2. Utrecht. 

— July 18. Utrecht. 

— Aug. 4, 8. Utrecht. — 31st. Italy, Zwanenburg. 

— Sept. 6. Berlin.— 6th. Utrecht.— 10th. Utrecht, "Wit- 

tenberg. — 13th, 14th. Utrecht. — 27th. 
Bologna, Utrecht, Zwanenburg, Schneeberg. 
—29th, (?). 

— Oct. 1. Utrecht, Zwanenburg, — 2nd. Utrecht, Got- 

tingen. — 3rd, 5th. Utrecht. — 9th. Utrecht, 
GottiQgen.- 19th. Portugal.— 23rd. Tu- 

— Nov. 23, 24, 27. Steinbronnen.— 28th. Utrecht. 

— Dec. 2. Plymouth, Steinbronnen. — 3rd. Utrecht, 



Wittenberg, Berlin. — 17th. Plymouth, 
Utrecht, Zwanenburg. — 18th. Paris, Utrecht, 
Dantzig. — 21st. Steinbronnen. — 22nd. 
Utrecht. — 23rd. Steinbronnen. — 24th. Italy, 
Berlin. — 26th. Steinbronnen. — 27th. 
Utrecht. — 29th, 31st. Steinbronnen. 

1748. Jan. 2. Steinbronnen.— 6th, 7th, 20th. Utrecht.— 

25th, 28th. Steinbronnen.— 29th. Utrecht. 

— Feb. 2. Plymouth.— 3rd. Utrecht.— 24th. Stuttgart. 

— 27th. Utrecht, Zwanenburg, Berlin, 
Wittenberg. — 28th, 29th. Zwanenburg. 

— Mar. 1. Steinbronnen. — 3rd, 5th. Utrecht. — 28th, 

29th. Stuttgart. 

— April 1. Tiibingen.— 20th. Steinbronnen.- 24th, 26th. 

Utrecht.— 27th. Stuttgart. 

— May 1, 2, 12, 21. Utrecht. 

— June 3. Utrecht, Tiibingen, Gottingen. — 4th. Zwanen- 


— July 17, 22. Utrecht.— 27th. Berlin. 

— Aug. 1. Utrecht. — 29th. Gottingen. 

— Sept. 6. Gottingen. — 8th. Plymouth. — 11th, 23rd. 

Utrecht. — 27th. Steinbronnen. 

— Oct. 12. Utrecht. — 18th. Steinbronnen. — 22nd, 


— Nov. 12. Berlin. — 17th. Steinbronnen. — 28th. Dantzig. 

— Dec. 8. DenainviUiers, near Pithiviers. — 14th. Dres- 

den. — 15th. Plymouth. — 16th. Utrecht, 
Stuttgart.— 18th. Utrecht, Berlin.— 24th. 
Utrecht, Stuttgart, Berlin, Wittenberg. 

1749. Jan. 10, 18. Utrecht. — 20th, 21st. Stuttgart. — 23rd. 


— Feb. 2. Stuttgart. — 9th. Zwanenburg, Berlin. — 11th. 

Utrecht.— 16th. Stuttgart.— 28th (?). 

— Mar. 6, 7. Utrecht.- 10th. Stuttgart, Steinbronnen. — 

11th. Utrecht.— 17th. Stuttgart.— 18th. 
Plymouth, Stuttgart.— 19th. Berlin.— 21st, 
23rd. Stuttgart.— 28th. Utrecht.— 31st. 

— April 2. Utrecht. — 5th. Plymouth, Zwanenburg, 

Berlin.— 7th. Plymouth, Stuttgart.— 9th. 
Stuttgart.— 10th, 12th. Gottingen.— 14th, 
16th. Stuttgart.— 17th, 18th. Plymouth. 
—22nd. Stuttgart. 

— May 3. Stuttgart.— 9th. Plymouth.— lOth. Utrecht, 

Gottingen 12th. Plymouth. 

— July 7. Plymouth.— 8th, 9th, 11th, 12th. Utrecht. 


1749. Aug. 15, 20. Utrecht. 

— Sept. 17. Bologna.— 22nd. Eome, Bologna, Utrecht, 

Zurich, Tubingen, Steinbronnen, Leipzig. 

— Oct. 8. Bologna, Parma. 

— Nov. 16. Utrecht. 

— Dee. 4. Stoke (Gloucestershire). 

1750. Jan. 1. Zwanenburg. — 3rd. Utrecht. — 5th. Zwanen- 

burg. — 6th. Denainvillers, Utrecht, Leipzig, 
Berlin, Wittenberg. — 23rd. Tooting. 

— Feb. 3. Naples, Bologna; Toulouse, Paris; Chelsea, 

London, Cambridge, Norfolk, Norwich; 
Utrecht ; Geneva, Boetterkinden, Zurich ; 
Zwanenburg, Cologne, Hamburg, Hanover ; 
Tubingen, Steinbronnen, Leipzig, Witten- 
berg, Berlin, Dantzig, Wotzlaw near Dantzig. 
— 4th. Hamburg, Wittenberg, Berlio, Dant- 
zig. — 6th. Breslau. — 7th. Italy ; Utrecht. — 
9th. Zwanenburg. — 10th. Gottingen.— 26th. 
Plymouth.— 27th. . Paris ; Chelsea, Ply- 
mouth ; The Hague, Utrecht ; Zwanen- 
burg, Wittenberg, Dantzig. 

— Mar. 4. Utrecht ; Zwanenburg, Tubingen, Stein- 

bronnen, Berlin. — 9th. Utrecht. — 11th. 
Utrecht; Leipzig. — 12th. Saxony. 

— April 3 Bologna. — 5th. Utrecht. — 8th. Utrecht ; 

Zwanenburg. — 13th. Hamburg, Zwanen- 
burg, BerHn.— 15th. Plymouth.— 25th, 26th, 
28th. Utrecht. 

— May 1 Utrecht ; Tubingen, Steinbronnen, Berlin. — 

2nd. Utrecht ; Wittenberg. — 3rd. Utrecht ; 
Berlin.— 4th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 22nd, 23rd. 

— June 2 Utrecht. 

— July 26 Utrecht ; Zwanenburg, Leipzig. — 27th. 


— Aug. 4, 5. Utrecht. — 24th. Paris; Zwanenburg, Witten- 

berg, Berlin. — 26th. Bologna, London, 
Utrecht ; Zwanenburg, Tubingen, Dresden, 
Berlin, Dantzig. — 27th. Bologna, Heilbronn. 

— Sept. 2. Utrecht.- 4th. Berlin.— 7th. Utrecht.— 8th. 

Utrecht; Zwanenburg. — 9th. Utrecht. — 
18th, 19th. Zwanenburg. — 22nd. Plymouth, 
Leipzig.— 23rd. Plymouth.— 29th. (?). 

— Oct. 12. Northampton. — 13th. Plymouth, Northamp- 

ton.— 21st, 22nd, 26th. Plymouth. 

— Nov. 2. Zwanenburg. — 4th. Plymouth. — 9th. Tubingen. 


1750. Dec. 14. Bologna, Utrecht.— 19th. Gottingen.— 26th. 

Utrecht. — 28th. Zwanenburg, Tiibingen, 
Steinbronnen, Grottingen. — 31st. Tubingen. 

1751. Jan. 3, 4. Utrecht.— 19th. Plymouth.— 24th. Utrecht. 

— Feb. 3. Sheffield, Tootmg.— 11th. Tubuigen, Stein- 

bronnen, Gottingen. — 19th. Paris, Witten- 
berg, Berlin. 

— Mar. 1, 2, 9, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, 81. Utrecht. 

— April 2. Utrecht.— 17th. Berlin.— 19th, 21st. Utrecht. 

—25th, 26th. Berlin. 

— May 18. Berlin.— 22nd. Utrecht.— 30th. Tubingen. 

— July 28. Berlin. 

— Aug. 19. Bologna, Plymouth, Zwanenburg. 

— Sept. 3. Tubingen.- 11th, 15th. Utrecht.— 19th. Tu- 

bingen.— 28th. Utrecht.— 29th. (?). 

— Oct. 19. Utrecht, — 23rd. Plymouth, Zwanenburg, Tii- 

bingen, Steinbronnen. 

— Nov. 30. Tubingen. 

— Dec. 4. Berlin.— 11th. Plymouth.— 24th. Utrecht. 

1752. Jan. 9. Utrecht.— 18th. Tubingen. 

— Feb. 26, 29. Tubingen. 

— Mar. 2. Utrecht. — 3rd. Utrecht, Zwanenburg. — 6th. 

Tubingen. — 7th. Utrecht. — 8th. Gottingen. 
—18th, 21st, 22nd, 31st. Utrecht. 

— April 2. Utrecht.— 14th. Zwanenburg. — 19th, 21st. 


— May 6, 13. Tubingen.— 17th. Stuttgart.— 22nd. Utrecht. 

— July 16. Tiibingen.- 21st. Stuttgart.— 31st. Tiibingen. 

— Aug. 2. Tubingen.— 4th. Stuttgart.— 23rd. Tiibingen. 

— Sept. 11, 15, 28. Utrecht.- 29th. (?). 

— Oct. 2. Plymouth. — 3rd, 4th, 5th. Zwanenburg. — 12th. 

Denainvilliers, Zwanenburg, Berlin. — 13th. 
Denainvilliers, Stuttgart, Berlin, Zwanen- 
burg. — 14th. Plymouth, Zwanenburg. — 19th. 
Utrecht. — 20th. Zwanenburg. 

— Nov. 8. Zwanenburg. — 17th. Tubingen.— 30th. Ply- 


— Deo. 5. Zwanenburg, Dantzig. — 14th. Tiibingen. 

1753. Jan. 2. Utrecht.— 23rd, 2Jth. Zwanenburg.. 

— April 7. Utrecht. — 20th. Gottingen, Brocken (Harz). — 

24th, 27th. Utrecht. 

— Aug. 27, 31. Utrecht. 

— Sept. 3. Gottingen.— 13th, 17th. Zwanenburg.— 22nd. 


— Oct. 11. Zwanenburg. 

— Nov. 28. Utrecht. 


1753. Deo. 30, 31. Utrecht. 

1754. Jan. 11, 19, 22, 26, 27, 31. Utrecht. 

— Feb. 1. Zwanenburg.— 14th, 15th, 19th, 21st, 23rd, 

27th. Utrecht. 

— Mar. 18. Utrecht, Zwanenburg.— 21st, 24th, 25th, 26th. 


— April 12, 15, 16, 18, 19, 23. Utrecht.— 27th. Zwanenburg. 

—28th. Utrecht. 

— May 4. Zwanenburg.— 8th, 9th, 16th, 17th. Utrecht. 

— July 23. Utrecht. 

— Aug. 14, 17, 19, 22, 23. Utrecht. 

— Sept. 21, 24. Utrecht. 

— Oct. 12, 16. Utrecht.— 27th. The Hague. 

— Nov. 14. Utrecht. 

— Dec. 14, 18, 19. Utrecht. 

1755. Jan. 6, 7. Venice.— 15th. Utrecht. 

— April 11, 12, 13, 14, 15. Utrecht. 

— May 4, 5, 7, 15. Utrecht. 

— July 15. Utrecht. 

— Aug. 15, 17. Utrecht. 

— Oct. 3, 10, 14. Utrecht. 

— Dec. 20, 29. Utrecht. 

1756. Jan. 20. Utrecht. 

— Feb. 5. Utrecht.— 15th. Berlin. 

— Mar. 24. Utrecht. 

— April 2. Utrecht. 

— May 4, 7, 20. Utrecht. 

— July 17. Utrecht. 

— Aug. 1. Utrecht. 

— Sept. 14, 17, 24. Utrecht.- 25th. Berlin.— 29th. Utrecht. 

— Oct. 12. Utrecht.- 25th. Berlin.— 26th, 80th. Utreoht. 

— Nov. 18, 20. Utrecht. 

— Deo. 1, 24, 25. Utrecht. 

1757. Feb. 20, 23. Utrecht. 

— Mar. 10, 11, 17, 20, 25, 26, 27, 28. Utrecht.— 31st. 


— April 1. Bouen.— 14th, 18th, 21st, 23ra, 30th. Utreoht. 

— May 13, 15, 16. Utrecht. 

— Aug. 9, 12, 15, 16, 19. Utreoht.— 26th. Dantzig. 

— Sept. 1, 2. Utrecht.— 16th. Utreoht, The Hague ; Berlin. 

—18th. Utrecht. 

— Nov. 12. London ; Berlin.— 17th. Utrecht. 

— Dec. 6. Berlin (?). 

1758. Jan. 7, 8, 9, 10. Utrecht. 

— Feb. 2. Utrecht; Berlin.— 12th, 13th, 14th, 25th. 



1758. Mar. 13, 14, 29, 30. Utrecht. 

— April 2. Berlin.— ISth. Utrecht. 

— May 2, 9, 10, ll. Utrecht.— 28th. Zwanenburg. 

— July 27, 28, 99, 80. Utrecht. 

1759. Jan. 20. Zwanenburg. 

— Feb. 4. London ; Berlin. — 5th. London. — 8th. Paris.^ 

20th. Bouen. 

— Mar. 23. London ; Zwanenburg. 

— April 5. Zurich, Woedensweil. — 25th. Zwanenburg. 

— May 11. London. 

— July 28. Zwanenburg. 

— Sept. 16. Bouen, Yvetot ; London ; Hanover, Gottingen, 

Zwanenburg. — 28th. London. 

— Oct. 2, 8, 31. London. 

— Nov. 23. Zwanenburg. — 26th. London ; Zwanenburg. 

— Dec. 23. London. 

1760. July 20. 


— Aug. 26. 


1761. Feb. 21. 

Vienna. — 28th. Erlangen; Tymau (Hungary). 

— Nov. 18. 

Berlin. — 19th. Zurich ; Beilin. 

1762. Mar. 21. 


— May 21. 


1763. Jan. 14. 


— Mar. 23. 


— Oct. 12. 

Warsaw.— 16th. Eisenach, Gotha, Erfurt; 

Warsaw. — 17th. England ; Eisenach, 

Gotha, Erfilrt, Berlin ; Warsaw. 

1764. Mar. 4. 

London. — 6th. Lisbon ; Oxford. 

— April 17. 

Berlin.— 23rd. Oxford. 

— Sept. 29, 

30. Posen. 

1765. Jan. 11. 


— Mar. 19. 


— Sept. 2. 


— Oct. 9. 

Denainvilliers. — 12th. Paris. — 18th. Denain- 


1766. Oct. 12. 


1767. Feb. 6. 


— Mar. 11. 


— April 18. 

Environs of Paris. 

— Aug. 5. 


— Deo. 13. 


1768. Feb. 15, 18. Biel. 

— May. 3. 

Plymouth. — 4th. Plymouth, Bridgwater ; 

Kiel.— 5th. Plymouth, Bridgwater.— 24th. 
Paris; Kiel. 

— Aug, 6. 


1768. Oct. 28. Rome ; Gurzelen ; Vienna ; Boeringen (Wur- 

temberg) ; Berlin. 

— Dec. 5. Paris, Denainvilliers, NanteuU ; Gurzelen ; 

Vienna ; Boeringen, Gottingen, Berlin. — 6th. 
Normandy. — 10th. Kiel. 

1769. Jan. 2. Berlin. — 5th. Paris, Montmorency. — 17th, 

18th. Berlin. 

— Feb. 1, 12, 15, 18. Berlin— 24th. Chateau de Broglie 

(Normandy).— 25th. Berlin.— 26th. Cour- 
lain (Beauce) ; Oxford. 

— Mar. 4. Havre.— 14th, 18th, 26th, 27th. Berlin. 

— April 13, 14, 17, 19, 20. BerHn. 

— May 27. Berlin. 

— Sept. 2. Between Paris and Bayeux. — 9th. Oxford; 

BerHn.— 2l8t. Oxford.— 26th. Burgundy ; 
Gurzelen ; Vienna ; Boeringen. 

— Oct. 2. Oxford. — 24th. Beziers, Auch, Paris, Rheims, 

Havre ; Vienna, Gruz ; Liibeck, Kiel, 
Berlin. — 25th. Paris, Havre ; Kiel, Liibeck ; 
lena, Franecker. — 26th. Paris. — 27th. 

— Nov. 3. Berlin.— 17th. lena. 

— Deo. 20. DenainviUiers. 

1770. Jan. 17. Hanover, Kiel, Berlin. — 18th. Cadiz, Spain ; 

Naples, Borne, Genoa ; Beziers, Burgundy ; 
London ; Debreczin, Vienne, Tyrnau ; Aus- 
pach, Boeringen, lena, Ltibeck, Kiel, Berlin. 
• — 24th. Kriegsheim (Rhenish Hesse). — 27th. 

— Feb. 1. Berlm.— 12th. Gurzelen ; Berlin.— 15th, 18th, 

25th. Berlin. 

— Mar. 14, 18, 23, 26, 27. Berlin.— 29th. lena. 

— AprU 13, 14, 17, 19, 20. Berlin. 

— May 27. (?) 

— July 31. (?) 

— Aug. 1. Liibeck.— 8th, 10th. lena.— 11th. (?).— 28th. 

Paris, Honfleur. — 30tb. Beziers, Normandy. 
— 31st. Conteville (Normandy) ; Gottingen, 
Berlin, lena. 

— Sept. 9. Berlin. — 17th. Burgundy, Paris, Montmorency; 

Gurzelen ; Vienna ; Boeringen, Liibeck. — 
20th. Boeringen. 

— Nov. 8. Liibeck. — 17th. Environs de Paris. — 26th. 


— Deo. 17, 24. lena. 

1771. Jan. 6, 15, 18, 20. Berlin. 


1771. Feb. 9, 10, 15. Berlin. — 18th. Sparendam. — 19th. 

Montmorency ; Franeoker, Berlin. — 20th. 

— Mar. 6. Montmorency. — 13th. Montmorency ; Fra/- 

necker ; Gurzelen, Berlin. 

— April 4. Berlin. — 5th. Montmorency; Boeringen; Ber- 

lin. — 15th. Montmorency, Berlin. 

— May 2, 3, 6, 7, 8. Berlin.— 12th. lena ; Franecker.— 13th. 

Gurzelen, Franecker. — 28th. Franecker (?). 

— June 2. Ltibeck. 

— July 12. Berlin. 

— Aug. 3. Berlin.— 5th. (?).— 29th. Franecker. 

— Oct. 5, 6. Berlin. — 9th. Berlin, Franecker. 

— Nov. 1. Franecker. — 12th. Berlin. — 13th. Denainvil- 

liers. — 14th. Franecker. — 18th. Berlin. 

— Dec. 5. Franecker. 

1772. Jan. 1, 3. Berlin. 

— Feb. 6. Berlin, Franecker. — 18th. Marseilles. 

— Mar. 2, 3. Franecker.— 5th. Wittenberg, Berlin.— 6th. 

Montmorency. — 7th, 8th, 9th. Franecker. 
— 22nd. Berlin. — 28th. Berlin, Franecker. 
—30th. BerUn. 

— April 3. Berlin, Franecker.— 20th, 25th. Berhn.— 29th. 


— June 14. Marseilles. — 21st, 22nd. Franecker. — (?) two 

auroras seen in June in the south of England. 
Dates not given. 

— July 18. (?) 

— Aug. 6. (?). — 11th. Franecker. — 31st. Montmorency; 


— Sept. 1. Franecker.— 20th. Berlin.— 25th, 27th. Fra- 


— Oct. 2. Montmorency ; Brussels ; Franecker. — 5th. 

Marseilles. — 6th. Brussels. — 14th. Mar- 
seilles ; Franecker. — 16th, 20th. Franecker. — 
23rd. Marseilles; Franecker. — ^26th. Mont- 
morency. — 27th. Ancona, Padua, Piec^- 
mont ; Marseilles, Montmorency ; Gurzelen, 
Vienna ; Boeringen ; lena, Berlin. — 29th, 
30th. Franecker.- 31st. (?). 

— Nov. 10. (?). — 15th. Marseilles. — 24th. Boeringen; 

Berlin. — ^27th. Berlui. 

— Dec. 3. Marseilles.- 18th. Berlin. — 20th. Marseilles. 

— 24th. Montmorency. 
1773. Jan. 16. Boeringen, Zutphen.— 17th. Boeringen; Berlin. 
— 18th. Franecker; Berlin.— 19th. Berhn. 


—21st. Praneoker; Berlin.— 23ra. (?).— 
24th. Gurzelen. 

1773. Feb. 1. Franecker.— 18th, 20th, 21st. Franecker, Ber- 

lin. — 22nd. Berlin. — 27th. Boeringen. 

— Mar. 12. Berlin, Franecker. — 13th. Boeringen, Fra- 

necker. — 14th. BerUn, Franecker. — 15th. 
Paris. — 16th. Franecker. — 21 st. Berhn. 
— 28rd. Franecker. — 26th. Montmorency ; 
Franecker, Berlin. 

— April 17. Franecker — 20th. Brussels ; Franecker. — 27th. 


— May 9. Boeringen. — 11th. Marseilles.— 13th, 17th, 

18th, 19th. Berlin.— 24th, 26th. Marseilles. 

— June 24, 29. Franecker. 

— July 17, 25. Franecker. 

— Aug. 13. Lemgo (Lippe). — 15th, 16th. Breslau. — 18th. 


— Sept. 1. Marseilles. — 11th. Montmorency ; Franecker. 

—12th. Franecker.- 15th. Berlin.— 22nd, 
24th. Marseilles. — 27th. DenainviUiers ; 

— Oct. 7. Berlin, Franecker.— 8th, 15th. Berlin.— 19th. 

Brussels, Franecker. — 20th. Montmorency ; 
Brussels ; Boeringen ; Franecker. — 21st. 
Franecker, Boeringen. — 27th, 28th. Fra- 

— Nov. 7. (?). — 8th. Boeringen. — 17th. Franecker. 

— Dec. 13. Franecker. — 15th. Marseilles ; Boeringen, 


1774. Jan. 10. Franecker. — 11th. Boeringen, Franecker. — 

12th. Franecker.— 16th, 30th. Boeringen. 

— Mar. 2. Berlin, Franecker. — 3rd. Montmorency ; Brus- 

sels; Franecker; Berlin. — 13th. Franecker; 
Berlin. — 14th. Montmorency; Buxton, Ken- 
sington ; Brussels ; Franecker ; Berlin.— 
15th. Miontmorency ; Brussels; Franecker. 
—17th. Franecker ; Berlin.— 18th, 20th, 
* 26th. Franecker. — 30th. Berlin. — 31st. 

Franecker; Berlin. 

— April 1. Berlin. — 4th. Franecker ; Berlin. — 6th, 7th. 

Berlin. — 23rd. Brussels. 

— May 1, 2. Marseilles. — 3rd. Brussels ; Franecker.— 5th. 

Marseilles ; Franecker. — 10th. Franecker. 
—14th. Cologne.- 16th. Brussels.— 23rd, 
30th. Franecker. 
June 6, 7, 12. Liibeck. — 13th. Marseilles.- 15th. Liibeck. 


1774. July 10. Marseilles.— 13th. Franecker.— 14th. Mar- 

seilles. — 24th, 25th, Franecker. 

— Aug. 1, 2, 3. Franecker.— 21st. Ltibeck ; Franecker. — 

22Qd. Marseilles; Franecker.— 27th, 28th. 
Marseilles. — 29th. Franecker. 

— Sept. 3, 19. Franecker.— 25th, 26th, 30th. Montmorency. 

— Oct. 1. Berlin. — 6th. The Hague.— 8th. Sparendam. 

—12th. Berlin.— 21st. Franecker.— 27th. 
Berlin.— 28th, 29th. Franecker. 

— Nov. 3, 5, 11, 30. Franecker. 

— Deo. 1. Marseilles ; Boeringen, Berlin. — 2nd. Boerin- 

gen.— 4th. Marseilles. — 26th, Sparendam. 

1775. Jan. 2. Montmorency.— 3rd, 4th. (?).— 6th. Franecker. 

— 20th, 21st. Montmorency ; Franecker. — 
23rd, 24th. Franecker; Berlin. — 25th. 
Franecker. — 28th. Montmorency; Fra- 
necker. — 30th. Berlin. 

— Feb. 1, 4. Brussels. — 19th. Franecker. — 20th. Bordeaux. 

—21st, 28th. Franecker. 

— Mar. 1, 19, 20, 21, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30. Franecker. Two 

auroras were seen this month at Berlin; 
dates unknown. 

— April 4, 13, 15, 17, 18. Franecker.- 19th. Louvain; 


— May 1. Berhn (?).— 2ad, 15th. Franecker.— 19th. The 

Hague. — 20th. Franecker. 

— July 20, 21. Franecker. 

— Aug. 4, 20. Franecker. 

— Sept. 5. Sparendam. — 14th, 15th, 16th. Franecker. — 

17th. Montmorency, Franecker. — 19th. 
Vu-e.— 22nd, 28rd, 27th. Franecker. 

— Oct. 18. Brussels; Boeringen.— 19th, 20th. BerUn (?). 

— 21st. Vienna ; Sparendam. — 24th, 25th. 
Franecker. — (?). Leeds. 

— Nov. 6. (?).— 23rd. Franecker. 

— Dee. 15. Franecker, Berlin.— 22nd. Berlin (?).— 23rd. 

Hanover. — 25th. (?). — 26th. Sparendam, 
Hanover.— 27th. Berlm (?). 
1776. Jan. 18. Berlin.— 20th. Hanover ; Franecker.- 21st. 
Franecker; Berhn. — 23rd. (?). 

— Feb. 11, 17, 18, 19, 20. Franecker. 

— Mar. 12, 13. Montmorency.— 26th. Holland— 28th. Mont- 


— April 8. Montmorency ; Brussels ; Franecker ; Berlin 

(?).— 10th. Brussels.— 14th. The Hague. 
— 19th. Franecker. 


1776. May 3. Brussels. — 21st. Franecker. — 23ra, 25th. 


— June 6, 7. Brussels. 

— July 7.- Franecker. 

— ■ Aug. 14. Montmorency ; The Hague, Sparendam ; Fra- 
necker.— 19th, 20th. Berhn (?).— 26th. 

— Sept. 3, 4. Franecker. — 5th. Montmorency ; Franecker ; 

Berlin.— 6th, 12th. Franecker.— 16th. Bor- 
deaux, Montmorency ; Brussels ; Franecker ; 
Boeringen.— 17th. Berlin (?).— 22nd. Mont- 
morency; Brussels, Breda, The Hague. — 
23rd. Montmorency; Brussels; Franecker. 
— 24th. Franecker. — 25th. Brussels. 

— Oct. 3. Franecker. — 17th. Sparendam.— 27th. Fra- 


— Nov. 16. Franecker; Berlin. 

— Deo. 16. Franecker. 

1777. Jan. 13. Montmorency. — 28th. Sparendam, Franecker. 

— 30th. Sparendam. 

— Feb. 5. Montmorency; Sparendam. — 6th. Sparendam. 

— 7th. Montmorency ; Sparendam. — 17th. 
Sparendam. — 26th. Limoges, DenainyUliers, 
Paris, Montmorency, Neufmoutiers en Brie, 
Caen, Havre, Montdidier, Nancy, E^thel, 
Mazarin, Cambrai, &c. : Breda, Amster- 
dam, Dordrecht, Middelburg, The Hague ; 
lena ; Franecker ; Berlin. — 27th. Montmo- 

— Mar. 1. Berlin. — 5th. Montmorency. — 6th. Brussels, 

Breda, Sparendam; Franecker. — 10th, 11th, 
12th. Franecker.— 13th. Berlin (?).— 17th. 
(?). — 22nd. Breda, Amsterdam ; Franecker. 
—25th. Berlin (?).— 28th. Berlin.— 29th. 
Breda, Sparendam, Franecker; Berlin. — 
31st. Sparendam. 

— April 1. Brussels. — 4th, 5th. Brussels ; Sparendam, 

Franecker, Berhn. — 6th. Montmorency. — - 
- 7th, 8th. Brussels ; Franecker. — 9th. Brus- 
sels, The Hague, Franecker ; Berlin. 

— May 4. Sparendam. — 5th. Breda, Amsterdam, Spa- 

rendam, Leeuwarden, Franecker. — 21st. 
Leeuwarden. — 30th, 31st. Franecker. 

— June 28. Franecker. 

— Aug. 6. Franecker. — 17th. Berlin. — 24th. Breda, 

Franecker. — 20th. Montmorency; Spa- 


rendam. — 27th. Montmorency; Sparen. 
dam, Pranecker, Boeringen. 

1777. Sept. 4. Berlin.— 7tli. He d'Ol^ron, Chinon, Brest, 

Saint- Male, Montmorency; Breda, Pra- 
necker. — 24th. Montmorency ; Sparendam, 
Pranecker; Berlin. — 20th. Perpignan. — 
28th. Pranecker. 

— Oct. 3. Geneva. — 8th, 10th. Pranecker. — 22nd. 

Sparendam, Pranecker. — 24th. Montmo- 
rency ; Pranecker. — 25th. Pranecker. 

— Nov. 8. Bordeaux, Sarlat, Viviers, Montargis, Denain- 

villiers, Paris, Montmorency ; Breda, Leeu- 
■warden, Pranecker ; Vienna ; Boeringen, 
lena, Berlin. — 6th. Sparendam. — 7th. 
Sparendam, Pranecker. — 9th. Sparendam. — 
21st. Breda, Sparendam, Pranecker. — 23rd. 
Sparendam. — 27th. Bordeaux, Dijon, Mont- 
argis, Chinon, Montmorency, Strasbourg; 
Sparendam, Pranecker ; Boeringen, lena. 

— Dec. 1. Sparendam; Berlin (?). — 2nd. Sparendam. 

— 8rd. Perpignan, Limoux, Toulon, Beziers, 
Viviers, Tarascon, Saint-Gahnier, Dijon, 
Chinon, Paris, Montmorency, Strasbourg. 
Lucerne and almost all Switzerland; 
Vienna; Batisbon, Nuremberg; Boeringen, 
lena, Berlin, Koenigsberg. — 4th. Berlin. — 
5th. Montmorency, Berlin. — 6th. Mont- 
morency; Breda, Sparendam, Pranecker; 
Vienna. — 17th. Sparendam. — 18th. Spa- 
rendam, P"ranecker. — 27th. Mannheim. — 
31st. Chinon. 

1778. Jan. 18. Pranecker.— 19th. Sparendam.— 20th. Pra- 

necker, Sparendam. — 21st. Montmorency, 
Pranecker, Sparendam. — 25th. Havre ; 
Vienna; Ulm, lena. — 26th. Pranecker, 
Sparendam. — 27th. Sparendam. 

— Feb. 16. Chinon, Saint- Malo ; Pranecker. — 17th. 

Chinon, Saint-Malo. — 19th. The Hague. — 
25th. Marseilles, Bordeaux, Tremblade, 
Poitiers, Montmorency, Havre ; Breda, 
Sparendam ; Boeringen ; Vienna. — 26th. 
Chinon; The Hague, Sparendam. — 28th. 

— Mar. 10. Perpignan. — 15th. Gurzelen. — 17th. Beziers, 

Denainvilliers, Montmorency ; Pranecker, 
Sparendam ; Bceringen. — 18th. Montmo- 


renoy — 19th. Sparendam. — 22nd. Breda, 
Franeoker, Sparendam; Berlin. — 25th. 
Berlin. — 26th. Bordeaux, Chinon, Mont- 
morency, Eouen, Cambrai ; Breda, Fra- 
necker; BerUn. — 27th. Franecker. Spa- 
rendam. — 31st. Berhn. 
1778. April 14. Switzerland; lena.— 17th. Berlin. — 18th. 
Lucerne. — 19th. Berlin. — 21st. Breda, 
Sparendam. — 23rd. Saint- Saturnin (Pro- 
vence).— 25th. He d'Ol^ron.— 26th. Boe- 
ringen, Berlin. 

— May 14. Franeoker, Sparendam. — 20th. Brussels. — 

22nd. The Hague. 
June 8. The Hague.— 10th, 11th, 12th. Franecker.— 
26th. Havre. — 28th. Cadiz ; Senegal ; 
B^ziers, Paris, Montmorency, Dieppe ; Fra- 

— July 8. Perpignan.— 7th. Berlin (?).— 9th. Padua; 

Bordeaux; Brussels, The Hague. — 15th. 

— Aug. 12. Franecker. — 18th. Berlin. — 22nd. Brussels, 

Breda ; Sparendam, Franecker. — 28th. 
Brussels, Breda; Berlin. 

— Sept. 15. Franecker. — 17th. Montmorency; Fra- 

necker. — 18th. Sparendam; Berlin. — 19th 
Viviers, Mur-de-Barrez, Eouergue. — 20th 
Mur-de-Barrez. — 21st. Bordeaux, Mur-de- 
Barrez, Viviers, Dijon, Saint-Malo, Mont- 
morency, Eouen ; Sparendam ; Boeringen, 
lena. — 22nd. Bordeaux, Tremblade, Chatel- 
lerault. He d'Oleron, Lu^on, Dijon, Saint- 
Brieuc, Saint-Malo, Montmorency; Fra- 
neoker; Vienna; Ukn; lena. — 23rd. Berlin 
(?).— 24th. Viviers, Dijon, Boeringen.— 27th. 
Sparendam. — 28th, 29th. Franecker. — 30th. 

— Oct. 9. Sparendam.— 18th. Berlin (?).— 14th. He 

d'Oleron, Montmorency, Eouen, Dieppe ; 
Franecker, Sparendam ; Berlin. — 15th, 19th. 
Sparendam. — 23rd. Franecker.— 26th, 27th. 

— Nov. 20. Franeoker. — 24th. Sparendam. 

— Deo. 2. Montpellier. — 7th. Sparendam.— 8th. Fra- 

neoker. — 13th. lena. — 14th. Troyes, Mont- 
morency. — 15th. Sparendam.-^17th. Fra- 
necker. — 26th. Montmorency. 


1779. Jan. 3. Breda.— 6th. Brussels.— 7th. Breda, The 
Hague, Boeringen. — 9th. Franecker. — 10th. 
Brussels, Sparendam. — 12th. Sparendam. 
— 13th. Franecker, Sparendam. — 14th. 
Sauit-Satumm.— 19th. The Hague, Boe- 
ringen.— 2l8t. Ingolstadt. 

— Feb. 4, 6. Leeuwarden, Franecker, Sparendam. — 7th. 

Boeringen. — 9th. Spain ; Nancy, Bethel, 
Cambrai ; Brussels, Breda ; Leyden, The 
Hague, Amsterdam, Sparendam, Franecker ; 
Boeringen. — 10th. Spain; Bordeaux, Vienna 
(Dauphin^), Ohinon, DenainviUiers, Bethel ; 
Glarus ; Boeringen, Ingolstadt ; lena, Berlin. 
■ — nth. Viviers, Vienna, Montmorency; 
Franecker, Sparendam, Gurzelen ; Boerin- 
gen; Berlin. — 12th. Vienna, DenainviUiers; 
Breda, Amsterdam, Sparendam, Franecker. 
• — 13th. B^ziers, Tarascon, Rodez, Vienna, 
Nancy ; Gurzelen, Basle ; Vienna ; Boe- 
ringen, lena, Berlin. — 14th. Beziers, Mar- 
seilles.^ — 15th. Perpignan, Beziers, Mar- 
seUles, Tarascon, Viviers, Eodez, Bordeaux, 
He d'Ol&on, Chinon, Essarts, Montmorency, 
Eouen ; Brussels, Franecker ; all Switzer- 
land, Boeringen, lena, Berlin. — 16th. Berlin. 
— 18th. Nancy. — 19th. Dieppe. 

— Mar. 1. Ingolstadt. — 2nd. Franecker ; Ploskow (Kiev). 

— 14th. Spain; Mur-de-Barrez, Cusset, 
Nancy, Bethel ; Gurzelen, Boeringen 
Vienna. — 15th. Batisbon. — 20th. An[ister 
dam. — 22nd. Boeringen. — 24th. Brussels 
Franecker. — 25th. He d'Ol&on, Chinon 
Montmorency, Eouen, Nancy, E^thel 
Brussels ; Breda, The Hague, Leyden, Am 
sterdam, Leeuwarden, Franecker ; Boeringen 
lena. — 26th. Amsterdam.— 30th. Mont- 
morency; Amsterdam. — 31st. Eodez, Mont 

— April 2. Nancy; The Hague. — 3rd. The Hague 

Berlin. — 4th. Franecker. — 6th. Berlin.— 
7th. Montmorency, Berlin. — 8th. Brussels 
BerUn. — 9th. Brussels, Breda; Franecker, 
Sparendam ; Berlin. — 10th. Nancy ; Bob 
ringen ; Berlin. — 11th. Essarts; Eatis 
bon. — 13th. Viviers. — 17th. Berlin. — 
18th. Brussels : Breda, Franecker ; Bee- 


ringen. — 19th. The Hague. — 20th. Eome ; 
Brussels, Breda, The Hague, Amsterdam, 
Sparendam, Praneoker. — 21st. B^ziers, 
Montmorency; Brussels, Breda, The Hague, 
Amsterdam, Sparendam, Franecker. — 22nd. 
Nancy ; Boeringen. — 28th. Brussels, Breda. 
1779. May 2. Brussels.^th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 10th. Berlin.— 
11th. Montmorency; Berlin.— 12th, 13th, 
15th, 17th. Berlin.— 20th. Denainvilliers, 
Brussels. — 24th. Eodez, Ohinon, Denain- 
villiers, Nancy, Dieppe ; Breda, The Hague, 
Leyden, Franecker, Sparendam. 

— June 3, 5. Brussels. —6th. The Hague.— 8th. Padua ; 

The Hague.— 14th, 15th. He d'OWron.— 
20th. Montmorency.— 24th. He d'OMron. 

— July 9. Bordeaux; Brussels, The Hague. — 15th. Bor- 

deaux ; Brussels. — 17th. Brussels. — 20th. 
Bordeaux. — 27th. Brussels. 

— Aug. 1. The Hague.— 3rd. The Hague, Franecker. — 

4th. Leyden.— 14th. Eouen.— 17th. Fra- 
necker. — 29th. Brussels. — 28th. Franecker. 
— 29th. Montmorency; Sparendam, Fra- 
necker. — 30th. Nancy. 

— Sept. 8. Sparendam. — 10th. Franecker. — 11th. Spa- 

rendam. — 17th. Saint- Saturnin, Vienna, 
Cusset ; Brussels. — 18th. Padua ; B^ziers, 
Marseilles, Tarascon, Viviers, Villefranche, 
Vienna, He d'Oleron, Pontarlier, Nancy, 
Montmorency ; Franecker ; all Switzerland, 
Bceringen ; lena, Berlin, Koenigsherg. — 19th. 
Mezin (Guienne) ; lena. — 22nd. Agde, 
Strashourg. — 28th. Franecker. — 29th. 

— Oct. 3. Montmorency; Brussels, Breda, Sparendam. 

— 4th. The Hague, Franecker. — 14th. 
Cusset, Nancy, Montmorency; Brussels, 
Breda ; The Hague, Leyden, Amsterdam, 
Sparendam, Franecker, Leeuwarden; Bce- 
ringen. — 17th. Nancy ; Brussels, Breda, 
The Hague, Franecker. — 19th. Perpignan. 
— 20th. Brussels. — 22nd. Sparendam. 

— Nov. 7. Saint-Saturnin.— 8th. He d'Oleron. — 9th. 

Perpignan, Saint-Saturnin, B^ziers, Nantes, 
Denainvilliers, Montmorency, Nancy; Brus- 
sels ; Breda, The Hague, Leyden, Amster- 
dam, Sparendam, Franecker ; Boeringen ; 


Vienna; Berlin. — 10th. Leeuwarden. — 12th. 
Lu^on. — 13th. Marseilles, He d'Oleron, 
Montmorency, Nancy ; Brussels ; Sparen- 
dam, Leeuwarden. — 14th. Brussels, Berlin. 
— 15th. The Hague, Leyden, Sparendam. 
—18th. Nancy. 

1779. Dec. 5. Montmorency, Nancy ; Brussels, Breda ; Am- 

sterdam, Sparendam, Franecker ; Boeringen ; 
Vienna. — 6th. Montmorency, Nancy ; Brus- 
sels, Breda; The Hague, Leyden, Amster- 
dam. Sparendam, Leeuwarden, Franecker ; 
Gurzelen. — 8th. The Hague ; Franecker. 
—9th. lena.— 10th. Brussels.— 11th. The 
Hague, Franecker, Sparendam.— 80th. The 

1780. Feb. 11. Franecker, Sparendam.— 22nd. Montmorency. 

— 28th. Franecker. — 29th. Spain; Padua, 
Turin; B^ziers, Montmorency; Franecker; 
Gurzelen, Geneva, Berne, Lucerne ; Boerin- 
gen ; Vienna ; lena ; Konigsberg. 

— Mar. 1. Perpignan. — 2nd. London ; Franecker ; Mann- 

heim; Koenigsberg; Pleskov. — 17th. Ber- 
lin (?).— 29th. Montmorency.— 30th, 31st. 

— Apra 2. Berlin (?).— 4th. Berlin.— 6th. lena.— 9th. 

Berlin.— 12th. (?). 

— May 5. Boeringen. — 7th, 8th. (?).— 17th. Lucerne.— 

19th. (?). 

— June 15. Montmorency. 

— July 18. Montmorency. — 20th. Lucerne. — 25th. Boerin- 

gen. — 27th. The Hague. — 28th. Como, 
Italy ; Montmorency ; Franecker ; Geneva, 
Gurzelen, Berne ; Boeringen, Frankfort-am- 
Main, Karlsruhe, Goettingen, lena, Berlin. 
— 29th. Paris, Montmorency ; Franecker. 

— Aug. 15. Batisbon. — 26th. Franecker. 

— Sept. 4. Franecker ; Berhn. — 3rd. Boeringen. — 4th, 5th. 

Franecker. — 17th. Dantzig. — 22nd, 27th. 

— Oct. 6. lena.— 10th. Berlin.— 30th. EocheUe, Viviers ; 

Geneva ; Franecker. 

— Nov. 3. Montmorency. — 4th. Berlin. — 21st. Eochelle, 

Girard, Saint- Mauritz, Troyes, Franecker. — 
22nd. Sparendam. — 24th. Boeringen. — 25th. 
Viviers, Eochelle, Girard, Saint-Mauritz, 
Troyes, Franecker ; Geneva Gurzelen, 


Berne; Vienna; Boeringen. — 26th. Eoohelle; 
Franeoker. — 27th. Montmorency. 

1780. Deo. 3, 5. Montmorency. — 7th. Lucerne ; Berlin.— 19th. 

Denainvilliers ; Berlin. — 30th, 31st. Trieste. 

1781. Jan. 16. Franecker.— 18'h. Padua.— 21st. Abtei St. 

Zenonis. — 28th. Mannheim.^ — 30th. Padua, 
Beziers, Montmorency; Lucerne; Vienna; 
Munich, Peissenberg, Kloster Bott, Eatisbon ; 
Berlin; Sagan. — 31st. Peissenberg. 

— Feb. 5. Montmorency. — 12th. Berne. — 15th. Padua; 

Beziers, Montmorency ; Batisbon ; Berlin. 
—16th. Mannheim. — 18th. Berlin. 

— Mar. 14. Franeoker; Mannheim; Boeringen, Kloster 

Bott, Wurtemberg. — 19th. Mannheim, Ber- 
Un. — 20th. Mannheim ; Erfort. — 2Srd. 
Padua. — 27th. Montmorency ; London ; 
Franeoker ; Mannheim, Boeringen, Batisbon, 
Brfilrt. — 28th. Montmorency ; Mannheim, 
Berlin. — 29th. Montmorency ; Mannheim, 
Erfiirt; Berhn; Sagan. 

— April 1. Berlin. — 4th. London. — 14th. Mannheim. — 

15th. Montmorency; Erfurt. — 24th. Mann- 
heim. — 25th. Montmorency. 

— May 4. Batisbon.— 11th, 14th, 16th, 18th. Berlin. 

— June 6. Florence, Eatisbon. — 8th. Mannheim ; Eatis- 

bon; lena. — 19th. Mannheim. — 28th, 29th. 

— July 6. Franeoker. — 8th. Mannheim. — 17th. Sparen- 

dam. — 20th. Berlin. — 22ud. Montmorency. 

— Aug. 6. Franeoker. — 16th. Wurzburg. — 21st. Mont- 

morency; Mannheim. — 23rd. Sagan. — 25th. 
Montmorency. — ^26th. Eatisbon, Mannheim. 

— Sept. 2. Mannheim. — 7th. Wm'zburg. — 8th. Mont- 

morency. — 9th. Wurzburg. — 18th. Breda ; 
Erfurt, Berlin.— 19th. Sagan, Berlin.— 22nd. 
Prague. — 23rd. Paris, Montmorency ; Boerin- 
gen, lena, Erfiirt. — 24th. Montmorency ; 
Maimheim,Iena, Erfiirt, Berlin. — 25th. Mont- 
morency ; Slough ; Breda, Amsterdam ; Boe- 
ringen ; Berg St-Ajidex. — 26th. Kloster Bott. 

Oct. 4. Mannheim. — 14th. Prague. — 15th. Padua; 

Montmorency ; The Hague, Franeoker ; 
Boeringen, Peissenberg, Eatisbon, Kloster 
Bott ; Sagan. — 16th. Prague ; Erfurt, Sagan. 
— 19th. Mannheim; Berlin; Sagan. — 21st. 
Sagan. — 23rd. Padua. 



1781. Nov. 8, 13. Sagan.— 14th. Berlin.— 15th. Erfiirt, Berlin. 

—16th. Boeringen. — 18th. Sagan.— 19th. 
Mannheim. — 20th. Boeriagen. 

— Dec. 10. Prague. — 11th. Padua; Mannheim, Boeringen ; 

lena ; Berlin ; Sagan. — 12th. Wurzburg ; 
Berlin.— 13th. Berlin.— 16th, 19th, 22nd. 

1782. Jan. 4. Prague. — 5th. Mannheim. — 7th, 8th. TScerin- 

gen. — 9th. Mannheim ; Sagan. — 10th, 12th. 
Mannheim. — 17th. Berlin (?). 

— Feb. 2. Berlin (?).— 3rd. Erfiirt, Berlin.— 14th. (?). 

— 15th. Tegernsee. — 16th. Tegemsee ; 
Prague.— 17th. Tegernsee. — 18th. Era- 
necker. — 21st. Franecker ; Tegemsee. — ■ 
22nd. Tegernsee. — 25th. Bologne; B^ziers; 
Amsterdam ; Prague. — 26th. The Hague. 

— Mar. 5. Franecker.— 6th. Berlin (?).— 9th. The Hague; 

Mannheim ; Sagan. — 10th. Prague, Sagan ; 
BerUn. — 15th. Montmorency ; Mannheim ; 
Sagan ; Berlin.- — 17th. Boeringen ; Berlin. 
—27th. Berlin (?).— 81st. Ratisbon. 

— April 1. Berlin (?). — 4th. Franecker. — 6th. Boeringen. 

■ — 9th. Lucerne. — 10th. Boeringen. — 13th. 
Berlin (?).— 22nd. Franecker.— 27th. Mont- 
morenoy.— 29th, 30th. Berlin (?). 

— May 5. Mannheim. — 7th. Padua; Montmorency. — 8th. 

Berlin (?).— 8th. Mannheim.— 16th, 18th. 
Vienna,— 20th. Berlin.— 23rd. Berne. 

— June 4. Padua. — 6th, 13th. Mannheim. 

— July 20. Mannheim. — 31st. Padua. 

— Aug. 2. Berlin (?).— 30th. Slough. 

— Sept. 2. Brussels, The Hague. — 6th. The Hague ; 

Sagan. — 10th. Mannheim.— 12th. Padua ; 
The Hague ; Mannheim ; Berlin. — 18th. 
The Hague ; Mannheim ; Eatisbon ; Prague. 
^15th. Brussels. — 30th. Eochelle, Mont- 
morency ; Brussels ; Mannheim. 

— Oct. 1. Montmorency; Brussels; Ingolstadt; Sagan, 

Erfurt ; Berlin.— 2nd. Berlin (?).— 3rd. 
Montmorency ; Sagan. — 8th. Eochelle ; 
Brussels, Franecker ; Mannheim ; Peissen- 
berg ; Buda ; Berlin. — 9th. Montmorency ; 
Middelburg; Eatisbon; Berlin. — 12th. The 
Hague. — 17th. Berlin. 

— Nov. 7. Eochelle. — 20th. Franecker. 

— Dec. 31. Sagan. 


1783. Jan. 9. Dijon — 13th. Franecker; Mannheim.— 30th. 

— Feb. 12. Tegernsee.— 19th. Breslau.— 28th. Liibeck. 

— Mar. 4. Franecker ; Liibeck ; Erfiirt, Sagan. — 16th. 

Berlin.— 18th. Padua.— 20th. lena.— 21st. 
Leeds ; Sagan. — 22nd. Prague. — 24th. 
Padua.— 25th. Sagan.— 26th. Slough; Fra- 
necker.— 27th, 28th. North Germany.— 29th. 
Montmorency ; Franecker ; Mannheim, Fur- 
stenfeld, Bavaria ; Sagan, North Germany. 
— 30th. Eochelle ; Gurzelen ; Mannheim, 
Diisseldorf ; Sagan, Erfurt ; Berlin ; North 
Germany. — 31st. Eochelle ; Franecker ; 
North Germany. 

— April 2. Amsterdam ; Mannheim. — 3rd. Sagan. — 7th. 

Padua ; Franecker ; Middelburg ; Mann- 
heim. — 9th Brussels; Berlin. — 12th. Leeds; 
Prague; lena, Berlin. — 14th. Erfurt. — 18th. 
Berlin. — 20th. Ftirstenfeld. — 21st. Fra- 
necker ; Fiirstenfeld ; Sagan. — 22nd. Mann- 
heim. — 25th. Brussels ; Franecker ; Sagan. 
— 26th. Montmorency; Leeds; Middelburg; 
Mannheim ; Erfurt ; Sagan. — 27th. Padua ; 
Eochelle, Dijon, Paris, Montmorency ; Fra- 
necker, Middelburg ; Dusseldorf, Mannheim, 
Eatisbon ; Prague ; Goettingen, Erfurt ; 
Berlin, Sagan. — 28th. Middelburg; Eatis- 
bon ; Prague. — 29th. Paris, Montmorency ; 
Franecker, Middelburg; Mannheim; Prague; 
Goettingen, lena, Erfiirt ; Berlin, Sagan. — 
30th. The Hague ; Mannheim, Fiirstenfeld 

— May 1. lena ; Sagan. — 3rd. Prague ; Sagan, Berlin. 

— 4th. Mannheim. — 5th. Mannheim ; 
Prague. — 12th. Montmorency ; Brusse'- 
Mannheim. — 16th. Montmorency ; Manu 
helm. — 17th. Brussels. — 21st. Berlin. — 
22nd. Montmorency, Laon. — 29th. Mann- 
heim; Eatisbon. 

— June 1. Padua.— 2nd. (?).— 3rd. Erfiirt.— 19th. Lau- 


July 2. Eatisbon. — 28th. Karlsruhe ; Goettingen. — 

30th. Mannheim. 

— Aug. 1. Franecker ; Mannheim ; Eatisbon. — 8th. 

Prague. — 9th. Eatisbon. — 19th. Berlin. — 
28th. Northampton. 


1783. Sept. 4. Mannheim. — 15th. Montmorency, Laon.— 

25th. Mid'delburg ; Prague.— 26th. Fra- 
necker ; Middelburg. 

— Oct. 22. Montmorency, Laon ; Middelburg ; Buda ; 

Peissenberg ; Sagan, Erfurt ; Berlin. — 23rd. 
Montmorency, Laon. — 24th. Bochelle. — 
26th. Dijon.— 27th. Berlin.— 29th. Montmo- 
rency, Laon ; Prague. — 81st. Montmorency, 

— Nov. 3. Mannheim. — 11th. Andex. — 13th. Mannheim. 

— 14th. Montmorency, Laon. — 15th. Dijon. 
—26th. lena. 

— Deo. 3. Berlin (?).— 4th. Mannheim.— 17th. Berlm.— 

18th. Prague. 

1784. Jan. 10. Prague.- 11th. Padua.— 20th, 21st. Bochelle. 

— Feb. 23. London, Kimbolton, Cambridge, Kensington. 

—25th, 26th. HUdesheim. 

— Mar. 5. Mannheim. — 12th. Eatisbon. — 13th, 14th. 

Mannheim. — 15th, 18th. Sagan. 

— April 9. Eatisbon. — 10th. Mannheim. — 16th, 18th. Ber- 

lin. — 21st. Padua. 

— May 6. Peissenberg. — 9th. Laon. — 12th. Paris ; Mann- 

heim. — 17th. Paris ; Delft ; Erfurt, lena. — 
22nd. Paris. 
-^ June 16, 17. Rochelle.— 21st. Eatisbon. — 30th. Saint- 

— July 1. Saint- V^ran.— 3rd. Delft.— 16th. Mannheim. 

— 24th. Berlin. — 25th. Padua ; Paris ; Mann- 
heim ; Geneva. — 26th. Mannheim. 

— Aug. 4. Prague. — 5th, 15th. Berlin. 

— Sept. 6. Sagan. — 8th. Mannheim. — 11th, 12th. Sagan. 

— 15th. Middelburg, Delft; Mannheim; 
Furstenfeld, Bavaria ; Prague ; lena, Sagan. 
—18th. Berlin {?). 

— Oct. 4. Eochelle. 

— Nov. 15. Padua; Dijon, Paris, Laon; Dusseldorf; 

Mannheim ; all Bavaria ; Prague ; Sagan, 
Erfurt, Berlin. 

— Deo. 31. Sagan. 

1785. Jan. 17. Berlin.— 26th, 28th. Tegernsee. 

— Feb. 3. Tegernsee.— 16th, 17th, 22nd. Mannheim. 

— - Mar. 3. Vienna.— 6th. Sagan.— 22nd. Paris. 

-— April 3. Brussels.- 12th, 27th. Mannheim.— 29th. Eo- 
chelle ; Berlin. 

— May 1, 15. Brussels. — 23rd. Paris. 

— June 28. Mannheim. 

— July 3, 17. Brussels. — 24th. Mannheim. 


1785. Aug. 3. Brussels. — 9th. Padua; Berlin. — llth. Brussels. 

—30th. Mannheim.— 31st. Middelburg. 

— Sept. 13. Brussels. — 20th. Berlin. — 23rd. Mannheim. 

— Oct. 4. Sagan ; Berlin. — 5th. Mannheim ; lena. — 6th. 

Middelburg.— 7th. Sagan.— 12th. Berlin.— 
22nd. La Eochelle. 

— Nov. 2. Laon ; Brussels ; Sagan, Erfiirt ; Berlin — 5th. 

Brussels ; Mannheim ; Berlin. — 6th. Sagan. 
— 29th. Mannheim ; Sagan ; Berlin. — 30th. 

— Deo. 13. Mannheim. — 19th. Berlin. 

1786. Jan. 4. Prague. — 14th. Mannheim. — 18th. Brussels. — 

30th. Tegernsee. 

— Feb. 17. Sagan ; Berlui.— 20th. Berlin.— 28th. Brussels ; 


— Mar. 19. Paris; Vienna; Prague. — 20th. Erfurt. — 21st. 

Vienna ; Sagan. — 2-2nd. Eome ; Padua ; 
Marseilles ; Brussels ; Berne, Sutz, Zurich ; 
Buda ; Munich, Berg Sankt-Andex, Peissen- 
berg, Tegernsee, Eatisbon ; Prague ; 
Sagan. — 23rd. Buda ; Sagan. — 25th. Mar- 
seilles; Mannheim; Berlin. — 26th. Sagan. — 
28th. Marseilles.— 29th. Marseilles ; Berne ; 
Sagan. — 31st. Sagan. 

— April 2. Sagan ; Berlin. — 3rd. Brussels. — 18th. Padua ; 

Brussels, Delft ; Eatisbon ; Sagan, Erfurt, 
lena ; Berlin. — 19th. Sagan. — 20th. Brus- 
sels ; Mannheim ; Sagan. — 21st. Sagan. — 
22ijd. Mannheim; Eatisbon, Wurzburg; 
Sagan, Berlin. — 23rd. Brussels ; Mannheim ; 
Sagan.— 24th, 25th. Sagan; Berlin.— 26th. 
Peissenberg ; Prague ; Sagan ; Berlin. — 
27th. Sagan. — 29th. Brussels, Delft ; Eatis- 
bon ; Prague ; Sagan. — 30th. Delft. 

— May 1. Paris ; Kendal ; Brussels ; Berlin. — 2nd. Brus- 

sels, Delft ; Berlin. — 3rd. Brussels ; Berlin. 
— 4th. Berlin. — 5th. Brussels. — 8th. Berlin. 
— llth. Kendal ; Berlin. — 12th. Brussels. — 
14th. Paris ; Berlin. — 15th. Brussels ; 
Prague ; Berlin. — 16th, 17th. Brussels. — 
18th. Brussels; Berlin.— 19th, 20th. Brus- 
sels. — 22nd. Eome ; Kendal ; Brussels. — 
24th. Padua ; Berlin. — 30th. Montmorency ; 
Sagan. — 31st. Eochelle, Paris, Montmo- 
rency ; Delft ; Berlin. 

— June 4. Delft.— 5th. Mannheim.— 28th. Delft.— 30th, 



1786. July 5. Paris.— 13th. Paris ; Kendal.— 15th. Kendal.— 

18th. Berlin.— 20th, 22nd. Brussels.— 24th. 
Brussels ; Berlin. — 25th. Montmorency. — 
29th. Prague. 

— Aug. 2, 3. Brussels. — 11th. Kendal. — 16th. Brussels. — 

17th. Kendal. — 18th. Montmorency; Brus- 
sels. — 19th. Brussels. — 21st. Brussels ; 
Mannheim. — 27th. Mannheim. 

— Sept. 3, 5. Mannheim.— 8th. Kendal. — 19th. Paris ; 

Kendal ; DeUt ; Mannheim ; Berlin. — 20th. 
Kendal ; Sagan.— 21st, 26th, 29th. tendal. 

— Oct. 2. Bome. — 10th. Mannheim. — 12th. Sagan.— 13th. 

Padua ; Paris ; Kendal ; Delft ; Mannheim; 
Sagan, Erfurt. — 14th. Padua; Mannheim. 
— 16th. Mannheim. — 17th. Brussels, Delft, 
Middelburg ; Mannheim ; Sagan. — 18th. 
Brussels. — 22nd, 23rd. Sagan. — 25th. Padua; 
Kendal ; Prague ; lena ; Berlin. — 28th. 

— Nov. 5. Berlin (?).— 8th. Paris.— 12th. Mannheun.— 

14th. Kendal. — 20th. Mannheim. 

— Dec. 2. (?). — 3rd. Mannheim. — 5th, 18th. Brussels.— 

20th. Middelburg.— 25th. Kendal.— 28th. 

1787. Jan. 7. Mannheim. — 9th. Bochelle. — 12th. Kendal.— 

21st. Bologna ; Mannheim ; Sagan. — 22nd. 
Montmorency ; Mannheim ; Prague ; Sagan, 
Erfiirt, Gottingen.— 24th. Kendal.— 25th. 
Paris; Kendal.— 27th. Pragiie.- 29th. Mann- 

— Feb. 6. Berlin (?).— 15th. Bologna, Padua; Paris.— 

i6th, 17th. Wurzburg.— 18th. Sagan.— 22nd. 
Kendal. — 25th. Mannheim; Prague; Berlin. 
27th. Prague. 

— Mar. 2. Mannheim. — 16th. Mannheim; Sagan. — 17th. 

Mannheim. — 18th. Paris ; Mannheim ; Mu- 
nich ; Buda. — 19th. Peissenberg. — 20th. 
Paris. — 21st. EooheUe, Paris; Kendal; 
Berne; Mannheim; Mimich, Peissenberg, 
Eatisbon ; Gottingen, Erfiirt, Sagan. — 22nd. 
Batisbon. — 24th. Kendal ; Mannheim. — 
26th. Mannheim. 

— April 1. EooheUe ; Sagan. — 2nd. BocheUe ; Mannheim ; 

Eatisbon ; Gottingen, Erfiirt, lena. — 6th. 
Sagan. — 12th, 18th. Bologna. — 16th. Sagan. 
—17th. Mannheim.— 18th. Padua.— 19th. 


Padua ; Eochelle ; Kendal ; Mannheim, 
Gottingea, Erfurt, Sagan. — 20th. Eochelle ; 
Kendal ; Mannheim. — 22nd. Eochelle. — 
23rd. Mannheim. — 26th. Kendal; lena. 
1787. May 4. Gottingen.— 10th. Eochelle.— 11th. Eatisbon.— 
12th. Kendal ; Erfiirt.— 13th. Eome, Padua ; 
Marseilles, Vienna, Eochelle, Paris, Laon; 
Buda ; Munich, Eatisbon ; Prague ; Sagan, 
lena, Eonneburg. — 14th. Padua; Eochelle, 
Paris. — 15th. Eochelle. — 16th. Paris ; Ken- 
dal. — 17th. Eome ; Eochelle ; Kendal. — 
18th. Paris ; Kendal.— 19th. Paris ; Peissen- 
berg; Erfurt. — 21st. Mannheim. — 25th. 
Montmorency.— 27th. Berlin (?).— 29th. Eo- 

— June 5. Eochelle. — 6th. Prague. — 7th. Eochelle; Ken- 

dal. — 8th. Paris. — 10th. Montmorency. — 
21st. Eome. — 24th. Mannheim. 

— July 11. Erfurt. — 13th. Eome, Bologna, Padua ; Mar- 

seilles, Vienna, Eochelle, Paris, Mont- 
morency, Laon ; Berne ; Mannheim ; Buda ; 
Gottingen, Erfiirt ; Sagan ; Berlin. — 14th. 
Bologna, Padua; Gottingen. — 16th. Bologna. 
— 20th. Mannheim. — 22nd. Mannheim ; Sa- 
gan. — 30th. Gottingen; Berlin. 

— Auff. 3. — Prague. — 7th. Paris ; Kendal ; Eatisbon ; Er- 

furt, lena.— 10th. Paris.— 11th. Berlin (?).— 
19th. Kendal; Mannheim. — 21st. Paris. — 
24th. Berlin (?).— 25th, 30th. Mannheim. 

— Sept. 6. Bologna ; Paris ; Middelburg ; Gottingen ; 

Sagan. — 7th. Paris ; Mannheim ; lena. — 
8th. Mannheim. — 10th. Sagan. — 19th. Ken- 
dal. — 23rd. Mannheim. — 26th. Prague. — 
28th, 30th. Mannheim. 

— Oct. 1. Sagan. — 4th. Kendal ; lena, Sagan. — 5th. 

Eome, Bologna ; Mannheim ; Prague ; Mvi- 
nich, Sankt-Andex, Eatisbon, Wurzburg ; 
Gottingen, Erfiirt, lena, Sagan. — ^6th. Eome, 
Bologna, Padua; Marseilles, Paris, Mont- 
morency ; Mannheim ; Berne, Zurich, 
Geneva ; Buda ; Prague ; Munich, Peissen- 
berg, Tegernsee, Sankt-Andex, Eatisbon, 
Wurzburg ; Gottingen, Erfurt, lena, Sagan. 
— 7th. Padua ; Kendal ; Eatisbon. — 10th. 
Berne ; Buda ; Munich, Peissenberg, Tegern- 
see, Eatisbon, Wurzburg; Sagan — 13th, 


Padua ; Eochelle, Paris ; Berne, Sutz, 
Geneva ; Buda ; Prague ; Gbttingen, Erfurt, 
Sagan, Berlin. — 14th. Gottingen, . Berlin. — 
16tli. Bochelle.— 17th. Marseilles, Eochelle, 
Paris ; Kendal ; Berne, Geneva ; Prague ; 
Gottingen ; Sagan, Berlin. — 19th. Kendal. — 
20th. Berlin.— 21st. Peisaenberg.— 24th. 
Batisbon ; Buda ; lena ; Sagan. — 31st. Eo- 
chelle, Paris ; Mannheim ; Berne, Geneva ; 
Buda ; Prague ; Munich, Tegernsee, Sankt 
Andex, Eatisbon, Wurzburg ; Erfurt, lena, 

1787. Nov. 2. Sagan.— 3rd. Prague.— 4th. Kendal jGottmgen; 

Berlin. — 7th. Sagan. — 8th. Eome ; Paris, 
Caen, Laon ; Kendal ; Mannheim ; Berne, 
Sutz, Geneva ; Munich, legemsee, Peissen- 
berg, Eatisbon ; Prague ; Erfurt ; Sagan. — 
9th. Brussels ; Mannheim ; Sankt Andex ; 
Prague ; Sagan. — 10th. Mannheim. — 12th. 
Wurzburg. — 13th. Mannheim. — 20th. Wurz- 
burg. — 21st. Montmorency. — 26th. Eome ; 
Eochelle, Paris, Montmorency ; Mannheim ; 
Berne, Sutz ; Eatisbon ; Gottingen ; Erfurt, 
Sagan.— 28th. Kendal.— 29th. Kendal; Ber- 
lin.— 30th. Kendal. 

— Dec. 6. Eochelle. — 9th. Paris. — 10th. Mannheim; 

Sagan. — 15th. Sagan. — 16th. Berne. 

1788. Jan. 8. Sagan. — 4th. Mannheim. — 5th, 8th. Sagan. — 

9th. Kendal ; Mannheim. — 10th. Kendal, 
Keswick. — 11th. Kendal; Mannheim; Peis- 
senberg. — 13th. Kendal. — 14th. Kendal ; 
Sagan. — 15th. Kendal. 

— Feb. 2. Sagan. — 4th. Kendal; Sagan; Berlin. — 6th, 

7th. Keswick. — 8th. Kendal. — 9th. Sagan. — 
11th. Spain ; Padua ; Eochelle, Mont- 
morency; Brussels, Middelburg; Mannheim ; 
Geneva ; Buda ; Munich, Peissenberg, Te- 
gernsee, Eatisbon ; Erfurt, lena ; Sagan, 
Berlin. — 12th. Keswick. — 15th. Eome ; 
Buda ; Erfiirt, lena. — 22nd. Mannheim. 

— Mar. 7. Eome ; Kendal, Keswick ; Sagan. — 8th. Ken- 

dal ; Sagan. — 14th, 22nd. Mannheim.— 27th. 
Brussels. — 28th. Paris ; Kendal ; Mannheim. 

— April 1. Paris, Montmorency ; Kendal. — 2nd. Mont- 

morency; Geneva. — 8rd. Kendal; Sagan. — 
4th. Brussels. — 6th. Sagan ; lena. — 7th. 


Kendal. — 10th. Eatisbon. — 14th. Kendal.— 
21st. Mannheim.— 23rd. (?).— 24th, 26th. 
Sagan. — 27th. Montmorency ; Kendal ; 
Sagan. — 28th. Kendal, Keswick ; Brussels. 
— 29th. Paris ; Kendal ; Eatisbon. — 30th. 
Paris; Kendal. 
1788. May 1. Kendal.— 2nd. Paris.— Srd. Brussels.— 4th. 
Kendal. — 7th. Brussels. — 10th. Kendal ; 
Brussels. — 11th. Kendal. — 24th. Padua ; 
Paris, Montmorency ; Kendal, Keswick, 
Dublin ; Brussels ; Mannheim ; Geneva. 
■ — 25th. Paris ; Kendal ; Brussels ; Mann- 
heim. — 26th. Brussels ; Eatisbon. — 27th. 

— June 3. Kendal. — 4th. Padua. — 5th, 9th. Brussels. — 

25th. Brussels ; lena. — 27th, 28th. Brussels. 

— July 1. Brussels. — 2nd. Mannheim. — Srd. Paris. — 5th. 

Jena. — 10th. Brussels. — 14th. Mannheim. 
—15th. Saint-Gothard.— 30th. Paris ; Ken- 
dal ; Berne ; Eatisbon. — 31st. lena. 

— Aug. 1. EocheUe ; Kendal. — 2nd, Srd. Kendal. — 11th, 

Mannheim. — 19th. Kendal, Keswick ; lena, 
• — 20th. Eome. — 2Srd. Eome ; Paris ; Ken^ 
dal, Keswick ; Mannheim ; Geneva. — 24th, 
Mannheim. — 27th. lena. — 28th. lena, 
Sagan. — 29th. Kendal ; Mannheim ; Wurz 
burg; lena, Sagan. — 31st. lena, Sagan. 

— Sept. 1. Brussels ; Sagan. — 2nd. Kendal ; Berne, 

Geneva. — Srd. Erfiirt, lena. — 4th. Paris ; 
Brussels ; Mannheim ; Eatisbon ; lena, 
Sagan. — 5th. Eome, Padua ; Mannheim ; 
Berne, Sutz ; Munich, Tegernsee, Eatisbon, 
Wurzburg ; Erfiirt, lena, Sagan. — 6th. Ken- 
dal ; Wurzburg ; Erfiirt. — 7th. Wurzburg. 
^lOth. Kendal; lena. — 12th. Mannheim. 
— 19th. Munich. — 24th. Spain ; Mannheim ; 
Tegernsee ; Erfiirt, Sagan, lena. — 27th, 29th. 

— Oct, 11. Kendal ; Mannheim. — 12th. Paris ; Sagan.— 
13th. Paris. — 18th. Sagan. — 21st. Spain; 
Marseilles ; Kendal ; Mannheim ; Geneva ; 
Buda. — ;22nd. Spain ; Eome ; Padua ; Mar- 
seilles, B<5ziers, Eoohelle ; Mannheim ; 
Geneva ; Buda ; Erfiirt, lena, Sagan. — 24th. 
Kendal. — 24th. Kendal. — 25th. Sagan. — 
26th. Geneva.— 27th. Kendal, Keswick; 


Sagan.— 28th, 29th. Sagan.— 30th. Kendal ; 
Sagan. — 31st. Paris, Laon ; Kendal. 

1788. Nov. 1. Kendal ; Geneva. — 2nd. Geneva ; Sagan, Er- 

furt.— 3rd, 18th. Sagan.— 19th. Kendal.— 
23rd. Paris ; Mannheim ; Sagan. — 26th. 
Sagan.— 27th, 28th, 30th. Kendal. 

— Dec. 8, 15, 16. Mannheim. — 20th. Peissenberg. — 21st. 

Kendal, Keswick.^23rd. Paris ; Brussels ; 
Berne ; Batisbon ; Sagan. — 24th. Kendal. 
— 30th. Maimheim. 

1789. Jan. 11. Kendal. — 19th. Sagan. — 21st. Mannheim. — 

22nd. Berlin (?).— 24th. Sagan.— 29th. 
faris ; Sagan. — 80th. Sagan. 

— Feb. 2. Mannheim. — 4th. Paris. — 15th. Keswick ; 

Berne. — 20th. Sagan. — 23rd. Kendal ; 
Sagan.— 24th. Paris. — 25th. (?). — 26th. 
Kendal ; Mannheim. — 28th. Kendal. 

— Mar. 8. Paris. — 14th. Paris ; Kendal, Keswick ; 

Brussels ; Sagan. — 16th. Kendal. — 20th. 
Mannheim. — 22nd. Sagan. — 27th. Eome ; 
Mairseilles, Paris. Montmorency; Brussels; 
Mannheim; Berne, Sutz,- Geneva; Eatisbon; 
Prague ; lena. — 28th. Eoohelle ; Brussels ; 
Mannheim ; Berne, Sutz, Batisbon ; Sagan. 
^29th. Marseilles ; Kendal ; Brussels ; 
Sagan. — 30th. Kendal ; Brussels ; Sagan. 

— April 12. Kendal. — 13th. Kendal, Keswick. — 17th. 

Brussels.— 19th, 20th, 27th. Sagan.— 29th. 
Mannheim; Sagan. — 30th. Kendal. 

— May 15, 16. Brussels. — 17th. Paris ; Mannheim. — 23rd. 

Paris ; Eatisbon. — 24th. Eatisbon. — 28th, 
29th. Brussels. — 31st. Sagan. 

— June 2, 4. Paris. — 10th. Eatisbon. — 12th. Paris; Kendal. 

—13th, 16th, 19th, 21st. Eatisbon.— 24th. 
Paris ; Eatisbon. — 30th. Brussels. 

— July 15. Brussels.— 16th. Paris.— 18th, 19th, 20th, 23rd. 

Brussels.— 24th. Paris.— 28th. Laon.— 29th. 

— Aug. 13. Keswick. — 14!h. Kendal ; Sagan. — 15th. 

Paris ; Kendal.— 16th, 18th. Kendal.— 19th. 
Kendal ; Berne ; Peissenberg ; Prague ; 
Sagan.— 20th. Kendal.— 24th. Paris.— 25th. 
Paris ; Keswick ; Eatisbon, Sagan. 

— Sept. 14, 15. Kendal:— 17th. Brussels. — 20th. Kendal, 

Keswick ; Sagan. — 21st. Brussels. — 23rd. 
Kendal. — 24th. Sagan.— 25th. Brussels ; 


Berne, Sutz ; Mannheim. — 26th. Eochelle, 
Paris, Falaise, Laon ; Kendal, Keswick ; 
Brussels ; Berne ; Peissenberg ; Mannheim. 
—27th. Sagan.— 30th. Paris. 

1789. Oct. 18. Kendal.— 19th. Marseilles; Kendal, Geneva. 

— 20th. Paris ; Kendal ; Brussels ; Peissen- 
berg; lena; Sagan. — 21st. Brussels. — 23rd. 
Kendal, Keswick.— 25th, 27th, 31st. Kendal. 

— Nov. 4. Kendal. — 6th. Peissenberg. — 10th. Kendal.— 

14th. Beziers ; Kendal, Keswick ; Sagan. 
— 15th. Sagan. — 18th. Brussels. — 19th. 
Kendal, Keswick. — 20th. Sagan. — 21st. 
Kendal, Keswick. — 22nd. Kendal; Sagan. 
—24th, 25th, 26th, 27th. Kendal. 

— Deo. 10. Sagan. — 14th. Kendal ; Sagan. — 15th, 16th, 

19th. Sagan.— 20th. Peissenberg.— 22nd. 
Mannheim ; Sagan. — 24th. Paris. 

1790. Jan. 6. Paris.— 9th, 10th. Sagan.— 14th. Kendal.— 

18th. Mannheim ; Sagan. — 29th. Laon ; 
Mannheim ; Prague ; lena, Sagan. 

— Feb. 1. Sagan.— 3rd. Kendal.— 4th. (?).— 9th. Kendal. 

12th, 13th. Sagan. — 14th. Mannheim.^ 
15th. Sagan. — 17th. Brussels. 

— Mar. 2. Mannheim.— 8th. Brussels ; Peissenberg. — 

10th. Kendal.— 11th. Sagan.— 16th. Ken- 
dal ; Batisbon ; Sagan. — 17th. Kendal ; 
Sagan. — 18th. Kendal; Mannheim. — 19th, 
20th. Kendal. 

— April 2. Mannheim. — 3rd, 4th. Kendal ; Mannheim. 

- — 5th. Kendal. — 6th. Kendal; Mannheim. 
— 7 th. Kendal. — 8th. Mannheun. — 9th. 
Kendal ; Sagan. — 11th. Mannheim. — 16th, 
17th. Kendal.— 30th. Brussels. 

— May 12, 14. Kendal. — 16th. Kendal; Peissenberg; 

Prague, Sagan. — 18th. Kendal. — 24th. 
Brussels. — 28th. Mannheim. — 30th. Prague. 

— June 3. Brussels.- 4th. (?).— 5th, 8th. Brussels.— 22nd, 

Peissenberg. — 25th. Mannheim. 

— July 13. lena. — 16th. Sutz, Switzerland ; Prague. — 

28th. Pavia (?). 
^ Aug. 3. Mannheim. — 8th. Paris. — 19th. Berne (?). 

— Sept. 9, 24. Sagan. — 30th. Brussels ; Mannheim ; Sagan. 

— Oct. 1. Mannheim. — 4th. Sagan. — 9th. Kendal, Mann- 

heim. — 14th. Mannheim. — 18th, 31st. 

— Nov. 4, 5, 6. Sagan. — 7th. Kendal.— 8th. Kendal; 


Sagan. — 9th. Kendal ; Mannheim.— -lOth. 
Kendal. — 12th. Kendal ; Sagan. — 16th. 
Kendal.— 26th. Sagan.— 27 th. Kendal, Kes- 
wick.— 28th, 30th. Kendal. 

1790. Dec. 25. Kendal.— 26th. Paris.— 28th. Kendal.— 30th. 


1791. Jan. 6. Padua ; Kendal, Keswick ; Brussels ; Sagan, 

Berlin. — 7th, 9th. Sagan.— 20th, 25th. 
Mannheim.— 28th, 29th. Sagan. 

— Feh. 21. Eatisbon.- 24th. Sagan.— 25th. Kendal.— 

27th. Sagan. 

— Mar. 2. Sagan.— 3rd, 5th. Kendal.— 7th. Kendal, 

Keswick.— 20th. Mannheim.— 26th, 29th. 

— April 8.- Kendal. — 5th. Sagan. — 13th. Mannheim. — 

18th, 20th, 23rd, 25th. Kendal. 

— May 5. Padna.— 12th, 20th. Kendal.— 23rd. Brussels. 

— 26th. Brussels ; Mannheim. 

— June 10. Kendal. — 19th. Sagan. — 26th. Brussels. 

— July 7. Mannheim. — 20th. Brussels. -l' 

— Aug. 8. Paris. — 18th, 20th. Mannheim. 

— Sept. 5, 8, 11, 13. Kendal. — 15th. Mannheim.- 27th. 

Kendal. — 28th. Kendal ; Brussels. 

— Oct. 6. Sagan.— 15th, 19th, 20th. Kendal. — 21st, 

Brussels. — 22nd. Kendal, Keswick; Brus- 
sels. — 23rd. Kendal; Sagan. — 28th. Prague. 
—29th, 31st. Kendal. 

— Nov. 3. Kendal, Keswick. — 4th, 5th. Kendal. — 8th. 

Mannheim.— 11th, 14th. Kendal.— 16th. 
Sagan. — 17th. Kendal. — 18th. Kendal ; 
Brussels. — 19th. Sagan. 

— Dec. 13, 19. Kendal.— 2Brd. Brussels.— 26th. Kendal; 

Brussels. — 27th. Sagan. — 28th, 29th. 

1792. Jan. 9. Kends^l.- 16th. Sagan.— 17th. Kendal.— 18th. 

Kendal ; Sagan. — 25th. Sagan. — 30th. 

— Feb. 9, 17. Kendal. 

— Mar. 2. Kendal. — 4th. Berg Sankt Andex. — 15th. 

Kendal.— 16th, 19th, 25th. Sagan.— 27th, 
81st. Mannheim. 

— April 10. Montmorency ; Kendal, Keswick ; Sagan ; 

Isserstsedt. — 11th. Kendal, Keswick ; Sagan. 
—12th. Sflgan.— 13th. Mannheim.— 14th.. 
Sagan. — 16th. Kendal; Mannheim. — 17th. 


1792. May 6. Kendal.— 8th. Brussels.— 9th, 14th. Sagan.— 

15th. Mannheim. — 20th. Brussels. — 22nd. 
Montmorency. — 27th. Brussels. 

— June 2. Sagan. — 29th. Kendal. 

— July 16. Peissenberg. — 19th. Brussels. 

— Aug. 1. (?).— 2nd. Sankt Andex.— 4th. Kendal.— 16th. 

Sankt Andex. — 23rd. Kendal. 

— Sept. 1, 6, 14. Mannheun.— 22nd. Kendal.— 28th. Mann- 


— Oct. 12. Kendal. — 13th. Marseilles ; Kendal, Keswick ; 

Brussels ; Isserstsedt ; Sagan. — 14th, 15th, 
16th, 17th. Sagan. — 18th. Kendal ; Sagan. 
—23rd, 31st. Kendal. 

— Nov. 13, 14. Sagan. — 19th. Kendal, Keswick. 

— Dec. 7. Keswick.— 12th. Padua.— 30th. Sagan. 

1793. Jan. 11, 12, 13. Kendal. 

-T-- Feb. 8. Kendal.— 12th, 15th. Kendal, Keswick. 

— Mar. 4. Paris.— 5th, 6th. Kendal.— 13th, 30th. Ken- 

dal, Keswick. 

— April 5. Kendal. — 9th. Kendal, Keswick. — 14th. Kes- 


— May 27. Montmorency. 

— June 9. Montmorency. 

— Aug. 26. Montmorency. 

— Nov. 8. Isserstsedt. 

1794. Jan. 7, 22. Manchester. 

— Mar. 8, 29. Manchester. 

— April 30. Paris, Montmorency. 

— Dec. 7. Viviers, Paris. — 8th. Paris ; Manchester. — 

19th. Manchester. 

1795. Sept. 8, 14. Manchester. 

— Oct. 16, 17. Paris.— 18th. Manchester. 

— Dec. 16, 17. (?) 

1796. Jan. 15. Montmorency. 
— ■ April . 6. Isserstasdt. 

— May 22. Paris. 

1797. Jan. 22. Manchester. 

— Feb. 1, 18, 17, 28. Manchester. 

— Mar. 1. 2. Manchester. — 10th. Yorkshire. 

— April 24. Manchester. 

— Jime or July (messidor, year V) 3. Eecords of auroras 

without date at Montmorency. 

— Nov. 18, 21, 22, 23. Manchester. 

— Dec. 20. Manchester. 

1798. Jan. 15. Montmorency. 

— Sept. 26. (?) 


1799. Feb. 25. Eckwarden. 

— July 24. Paris. 

— Sept. 3. Harrogate. — 4th. Paris. 

— Oct. 25. Manchester. 

1800. Mar. 18. Manchester. 

— Aug. 15, 18. Paris. 

— Nov. 2, 7. Manchester. 

— Deo. 10. Manchester. 

1801. Jan. 4, 25. Manchester. 

— Feb. 22. Manchester. 

— Mar. 9. (?). 

— Oct. 6. Manchester. 

1802. Feb. 3. Manchester. 

— Mar. 29. Manchester. 

— June 3. Batisbon. 

— Sept. 27. At sea, off Liverpool. 

— Deo. 13. Manchester. 

1803. Mar. 19. Paris. 

— April 12, 13. Manchester. 

— Sept. 11, 17. Manchester. 

— Oct. 12. Manchester. 

— Deo. 3. Manchester. 

1804. Feb. 2. Manchester. 

— Mar. 29. Paris. 

— April 1, 4. Manchester. 

— May 2. Manchester. 

' — Oct. 12. Schnepfenthal. — 22nd. Paris ; England ; 
Bruges ; Prague, Bohemia ; Halle, lena ; 
Schnepfenthal, Breslau, Berlin ; Koenigs- 
berg.-23rd, 24th. lena. 

— Nov. 22, 25. Manchester. 

1805. Jan. 1. Manchester, Carlisle. 

— Feb. 23. Manchester. 

— Mar. 26. Carlisle. 

— April 30. Manchester. 

— May 27, 28. Carlisle. 

— Sept. 21. CarUsle.— 22nd. Carlisle ; Berne.— 23rd. Car- 

lisle. — 24th. Paris ; Manchester, Carlisle. 

— Oct. 13, 20, 21. CarUsle.— 22nd. Manchester. 

— Nov. 16, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26. Carlisle. 

— Deo. 26. Carlisle. 

1806. Feb. 7. Manchester. 

— Sept. 12. Manchester. 

— Nov. 2. Manchester; Eckwarden. — 30th. Zurich. 

— Dec. 20. Berlin. 

1807. Jan. 13. Halle.— 26th. Dantzig. 


1808. Mar. 25. Manchester. 

1809. No aurora borealis recorded this year within the prescribed 


1810. Oct. 5. Batisbon. 

1811-1812. No aurora in these two years within the prescribed 

1813. June 24. Augsburg, 

— Sept. 24. Augsburg. 

11314. April 7. Tottenham; Berne.— 15th. Eatisbon.— 17th. 
Tottenham, England. 

— May 22. Eatisbon. 

— Sept. 10. Manchester. — 11th. Manchester, Kendal. 

1815. Mar. 2. Eatisbon. 

— May 29. Eatisbon. 

1816. May 17. Eatisbon. 

— Sept. 15. Manchester. 

1817. Jan. 8. Berne. 

— Feb. 6. Paris. — 8th. Paris ; Sunderland and many 

parts of England; Berne, Hofwyl, Saint- 
GaU ; Augsburg ; Prague ; Halberstadt, 
Leipzig. — 9th. Kosnigsberg.^ — 10th. Eatis- 
bon.— 18th. Hamm; Prague.— 20th. Walt- 

— Mar. 4. Karlsruhe. — 5th. Gordon Castle, Glasgow. 
— ■ June 12. Eatisbon. 

— - Aug. 16. Eatisbon. 

— Sept. 19. Gosport. 

— Oct. 17. Gosport. 

1818. Jan. 11. Prague and many parts of Bohemia. 
Feb. 5. Gordon Castle. 

— AprU 4. Eatisbon. 

— Oct. 26. Sunderland. — 31st. Bishopswearmouth (Sun- 


1819. Feb. 1. Paris.— 23rd. Prague. 

— Mar. 12. Prague. 

— April 19. , (?).— 26th. Eatisbon. 

— Oct. 6. Zurich. — 7th. Flensburg.— 12th. Manches- 

ter. — 15th. Suffolk. — 17th. London and 
neighbourhood, Gosport, Manchester, 
Kendal, Keswick, Seathwaite. — 31st. Gos- 

— Deo. 14. London, Manchester. 

1820. Jan. 14. London, Stratford. 

— Feb. 9. Paris (?).— 11th. Manchester. 

— Sept. 6. (?). 

— Nov. 20. Paris. 


1820. Deo. 4. England. 

1821. Mar. 25. Gosport. 

— Nov. 26. Manchester. 

— Dec. 12. Manchester. 

1822. July 12, 17. Paris. 

1823 No aurora recorded for this year within the prescribed 

1824. Nov. 16. Koenigsberg. 

1825. Oct. 7. Paris. 

— Nov. 7. (?). 

1826. Jan. 5. Kcenigsberg. 

— Mar. 29. Carlisle, Doncaster, Kendal, Keswick, Man- 

cheater, Preston, Penrith, Warrington, White- 

— April 29. Paris, Carlisle. 

— Aug. 29. {?). 

— Sept. 17, 18. (?). 

— Oct. 26, 27. (?). 

1827. Jan. 9. Paris ; Kendal. — 18th. Manchester, Gosport. 

— Feb. 13. Gosport. — 17th. Manchester, Gosport. 

— Aug. 13. (?).— 25th. Paris, Saint-Cloud. 

r— Sept. 8. Saint-Cloud; Berlin.— 9th. Many parts of 
England. — 25th. Paris, Havre, Arras, Doul- 
lens; Kendal, England; Ostend, Holland; 
Aarau, Zurich, Saint-Gall; Stuttgart, Mu- 
nich, Bavaria ; Prague, Arcona, Apenrade. — 
26th. Gosport ; Berlin, Stettin ; Apenrade. — 
28th. Paris. 

Manchester; Allerly. — 17th. Gosport. 

Gosport, AUerly. — 19th. Ajlerly. 


1828. June 2. Yorkshire. 
Montmorillon.— 12th, 17th. (?). 
Prague. — 20th. Chesterfields Lodge near 

Stevenage. — 25th. Gosport. — 29th. Lon- 
don, Gosport, Kendal, Manchester, Lynn 
Regis, Penzance, Boreham, Essex, Smedley 
Hall, Chesterfields Lodge.— 30th. Plymouth, 

— Oct. 1. Gosport.— 9th. Manchester.— 31st. Paris (?). 

— Dec. 1. Manchester, Wicksworth (Derbyshire). — 20th. 

(?).— 22nd. CrumpsaU HaU (Manchester).— 
26th. HuU, Gosport, Manchester, Crump- 
saU Hall.— 28th. Crumpsall Hall. 

1829. Jan. 2. Manchester. 

— Feb. 11. Berlin. 














1829. Mar. 4, 6. Crumpsall Hall.— 22nd. Crumpsall Hall, 

Biggleswade. — 29th. England. 

— April 3. Dieppe. 

— May 2. Paris 4th. Crumpsall Hall. 

— June 1. Paris.— 7th. (?).— 17th. Crumpsall Hall. 

— July 25. Kendal, Crumpsall Hall, Manchester. 

— Aug. 1. (?).— 25th. Kendal. 

— Sept. 19. Crumpsall Hall, Manchester. — 21st. Paris. 

— Oct. 2. Kendal. — 3rd. CrumpsaU Hall, Manchester. — 

17th. Manchester.— 25th. Kendal.— 30th. 

— Deo. 14. London, Gosport. 

1830. Jan. 28. Kendal. 

— Peh. 19. Kendal.— 20th. Gosport. 

— Mar. 18. Manchester. 

— April 19. Manchester, York, and many parts of England. 

— 24th. Manchester, Leeds. 

— May 19. England. 

— Aug. 20. Kendal, Crumpsall Hall. 

— Sept. 7. Gosport, Manchester, Bedford, Isle of Man. 

— Oct. 5. Gosport, Kendal, Carlisle, Bedford, on the 

Atlantic, on 42° 20' lat. N., and 39° 29' long. 
W.— 9th. Cambridge.— 16th, 17th. Gos- 
port. — 20th. London. — 22nd. Manchester, 
Crumpsall Hall. 

— Nov. 1. Gosport, Boston, Bedford, Crumpsall Hall. — 

3rd. Kendal. — 4th. Gosport, Bedford, 
Crumpsall Hall. — 7th. Gosport, Bedford. — '■ 
10th. Crumpsall Hall. 

— Dec. 7. Marburg ; Warsaw. — 11th. Gosport, Bedford ; 

Neckarthal (Wurtemberg). — 12th. Gosport, 
Falmouth, CrumpsaU Hall. — 13th. Gosport, 
Bedford. — 14th. Gosport, Bedford ; War- 
saw. — 22nd. Ackworth, Yorkshire. — 25th. 
Gosport, Kendal, Manchester, Smedley Hall. 
—20th. Kendal. 

1831. Jan. 6. Crumpsall Hall. — 6th. Gosport, Manchester. 

■ — 7th. Madrid; Trieste; Paris, Versailles, 
Strasbourg; Gosport, Bedford, Woolwich, 
Blaokheath, Falmouth, &c. ; Brussels, 
Maastricht, Utrecht; Geneva, Basle, Zurich ; 
Vienna ; Munich, Botzen, Augsburg, 
Bayreuth ; Brunswick, Wurzburg, Marburg, 
Elberfeld, Bernburg, Gotha, Leipzig; 
Breslau, Salzuffeln, Berlin, Colberg, Konigs- 
berg ; Angerburg ; Brakel ; Cracow ; War 


Baw. — 8th. Woolwich, Bedford, Falmouth, 
Gosport, Cnimpsall Hall ; Wurtemberg. — 
ipth. Falmouth, Crumpsall Hall.— 11th. 
Kendal, Gosport, Bedford, Falmouth, Heron 
Court.— 14th. Falmouth; Atlantic— 15th, 
16th. Atlantic. — 21st. Manchester. 

1831. Feb. 11. Manchester, Crumpsall Hall. — 14th. Crump- 

sail Hall, Lancaster. — 15th. Falmouth. — 
17th. Falmouth, Lancaster. — (?). Kenac, 
near Bennes. 

— Mar. 6. Crumpsall Hall. — 7th. GrumpsaU Hall, Heron 

Court ; Buchholtz near Frankfort-sur-Oder. 
— 8th. Manchester, Gosport. — 11th. Man- 
chester, Marsden, Gosport, Lancashire. — 
12th, 13th. Crumpsall Hall. 

— April 3. Crumpsall Hall. — 19tb. Manchester, Gosport ; 

Berlin. — 20th. Gosport ; Berlin, Kitzingen, 
— 23rd. Manchester. 

— May 30. Gosport. 

,— July 14. (?).— 20th. Gosport. 

— Aug.3,5. Eome.— 7th. (?).— 12th. Paimboeuf.— 26th. 

Basle. — Both. Augsburg. 

— Sept. 12. Manchester, Gosport. 

— Oct. 29. Manchester, Gosport. — Several auroras at 

Kendal in September and October, precise 
dates not given. 

— Nov. 8. Wurtemberg. 

— Dec. 9, 22. Paris. 

1832. Jan. 14, 15, 16. (?).— 27th. Manchester. 

— Feb. 2. Giengen (Wurtemberg).— (?). Paris (?). 

— Sept. 17. Cambridge, Manchester and district, York, 

Dent near Kendal, Armagh. — 23rd. Man- 
chester, Smedley HaU. 

— Oct. 12. England. 

— Nov. 1. Manchester, Bradford, Burnley, Kendal, &c. — 

4th. Lincoln. 

— Dec. 21. Newcastle upon Tyne ; Allerly. 

1883. Feb. 11. Manchester. — 18th. CrumpsaU HaU. — 19th. 

— Mar. 13. Cambridge. — 21st. Manchester ; observ. of 

Armagh, Athboy (Ireland). 

— Aug. 6. Crumpsall Hall. 

— Sept. 1. Carhsle.— 14th. York, Greta-Bridge.— 15th. 

Burn. — 17th. London, Cambridge, York, 
Gosport, Manchester, Ireland — IRth. Man- 


1833. Oct. 19. Paris; Cambridge, Manchester, York, Heron 

Court, Guisborough, Dent, Armagh. 

— Nov. 12. Brussels. 

1834. Jan. 5. Catterick Bridge (Yorkshire).— 15th. Brussels. 

— Feb. 10. Augsburg.— 20th. Kendal. 

— June 28. Brussels. 

— July 8. (?). 

— Sept. 21. (?). 

— Nov. 3. England. 

— Deo. 21. England. — 22nd. Woolwich ; Braunsberg 

(eastern Prussia), Kcenigsberg. 

1835. Jan. 4. Augsburg. 

— Feb. 7. England; Gottingen; Braunsberg, Germany. 

— 27th. Braunsberg. 

— July 3. (?). 

— Nov. 16. Woolwich. — 17th. Paris ; London, Ashurst, 

Dulwich and many parts of England; 
Hanover; Berlin. — 18th. Nlmes, Cahors, 
Paris, Caen, Corbigny, Cherbourg; London, 
Chiswick, Greenwich, Woolwich, Oxford, 
Banbury, Deal, Collumpton; Armagh, Ire- 
land ; Brussels ; Oldenburg. — 19th. Paris. 

1836. April 22. Channel Islands ; High-Burns near Sunder- 


— May 15. Sunderland.— 20th. Paris.— 24th. (?). 

— .Aug. 10. Byde. 

— Sept. 29. Dublin. 

— Oct. 5. Dublin. — 11th. Dublin, Leominster ; Zurich ; 

Braunsberg. — 12th. Zurich ; Braunsberg. 
■ — 18th. Spain; Parma, Forli, Turin; 
Cahors, Chamb^ry, Paris, Strasbourg, Caen, 
Cherbourg, Corbigny, Eennes, Nantes; 
London, Londonderry and many parts of 
England ; Brussels, Liege ; Aix-la-OhapeUe, 
Elberfeld, Cologne, Dusseldorf, Mayence; 
Wiesbaden, Karlsruhe ; Stuttgart, Frankfort- 
on-Mein; Zurich, Basle, Geneva; Inns- 
briiok ; Prague ; Osnabriick, Hanover, Got- 
tingen ; Dresden ; Berlin, Swinemunde, 
Colberg, Braunsberg, Danzig, Heiligenbeil, 
Elbing, Konigsberg ; Lamberg ; Warsaw. 
—19th. Zurich. 

— Nov. 15. Brest. — 27th. Hanover. 

1837. Jan. 25. Basle, Zurich, nearly all Switzerland; Stutt- 

gart, Giengen, Bubach. — 26th. Giengen. — 
27th. Mechlin. 


1837. Feb. 2. (?).— 13th. Zurich ; Konigsberg and district. 
—14th. Zurich.— 18th. Eome, Forfi, Pise, 
Venice, coast of Istria, Parma, Milan ; 
Marseilles, Montpelher, Paris, Meaux, Luz- 
arches, Versailles, Beauvais, Morlaix, Sar- 
reguemines; London, Devonshire, Kent, 
Belfast, Sidmouth, Athurst; Zurich, Basle, 
Geneva ; Prague ; Stuttgart, all Swabia ; 
Cologne, Nuremberg; Gottingen, Gotha, 
Halsbruck, Gnadenfeld (Silesia). 

— Mar. 29. Zurich, Switzerland. 

— April 6. Anglers ; Breslau. — 7th. Munich. 

— May 2. Breslau. — 19th. England. 
~ June 24. England. 

— July 1, 2, 7. England. — 28th. Mannheim, Stuttgart; 


— Aug. 4. Naples. — ^25th. England. 

— Sept. 22. Brussels.— 23rd. Hamburg.— 29th. Dublin. 

— Oct. 6. Paris. — 11th. England. — 18th. Parma; Paris; 

Geneva, Zurich, Switzerland; Bamberg, 
HUdburghausen, &c., and all Germany ; 
Warsaw. — 19th. Geneva. — 2l8t. Warsaw. 
—22nd. Atlantic 40° 22' lat. N. and 38° 
54' long. W. 

— Nov. 6. Paris, Brest, Ushant ; London ; Leipzig. — ■ 

12th. Parma, between Genoa and Leghorn ; 
Montpellier, Anglers, Vendome, Jambles 
near Givry, Paris, Athurst, Dulwich, &c., 
England ; Brussels ; Aix-la-Chapelle ; Basle ; 
Prague ; Augsburg, Wurzburg ; Kirchheim 
(Hesse), Hildburghausen, Gotha, Hanover; 
Berlin, Stettin. — 14th. Paris, Jambles near 
Givry, Brest ; Basle ; Augsburg ; Hanover ; 
Cracow. — 15th. Paris, Brest. 
1833. Jan. 6. (?).— 29th. Stuttgart, Wurtemberg. 

— Feb. 18. England. 

— AprU 29. Brussels. 

— Sept. 18. Paris ; Athurst, Dulwich. — 15th. Paris. 

— Nov. 12. Slough; Bremen; Eutin. — 13th. Paris. 
1839. Jan. 2. Milan. — 6th. Parma. — 10th. Hamburg and 

in the north. — 12th, 14th. Parma.— 17th. 
Brussels. — 18th. England. — 19th. Chiswick, 
Athurst, Dulwich, Dublin ; Brussels. 

— Feb. 21. Eutin. 

— May. 5. France ; England ; Brussels. — 7th. Parma, 

Saint-Brice near Ecouen. 


1839. Aug. 30. Warsaw. 

— Sept. 1. Zurich. — 3rd. Turin, Alexandria, Asti ; Paris ; 

London, Athurst, Dulwich ; Brussels ; many 
parts of Wurtemberg ; G'ottiiigeii. — 25th. 

— Oct. 16. Douai. — 22nd. Madeira ; Eome, Pesaro ; 

MarseUles, Aix, Toulouse, Paris, Meaux, 
Commeroy, Strasbourg, Benac near Eennes ; 
Brussels ; Geneva ; Stuttgart and many 
places in Wurtemberg; Berlin, Eutin. — 
23rd. Eutin. 

— Nov. 1. Eutin. — 12th. Prague. 

— Dec. 14. Gosport. 

1840. Jan. 3. Huggate ; Geneva ; Halle. — 11th. Geneva. 

— Feb. 6. Cracow. — 17th. Einsiedeln, Switzerland. — 

25th. Brussels. 

— Mar. 11. (?). 

— April 24. Dublin. 

— May 29. Paris. 

— June 27. Parma. 

— July 5, 22, 23. Parma. 

— Aug. 8. Ghent.— 19th. Prague. 

• — Sep. 21. Parma; Brussels, Ghent, Groninguen, Fra- 
neeker ; Cracow. 

— Oct. 9. Parma.— 18th. Franckfort-on-Mein. — 19th. 

Parma. — 21st. Paris. — 22nd. Parma. — 
29th. Parma; Brussels. 
~ Nov. 7. Greenwich.— 12th. Paris.— 14th, 24th, 28th. 

— Dec. 11. Brussels. — 14th. England. — 21st. Brussels, 

Ghent, Groninguen, Franecker ; Eutin ; 
Cracow. — 24th, 28th. Parma. 

1841. Jan. 8. Greenwich.- — 24th. Brussels. Two auroras 

were seen this month at Eutin ; dates not 

— Feb. 24. Brussels. 

— Mar. 10. Greenwich. — 22nd. Greenwich, Durham, 

York, Belfast, England. 

— April 12. Greenwich. — 15th. Prague. 

— June 15, 16, 21. Brussels. 

— Aug. 2. Prague.— 10th. Parma.: — 23rd. Brussels. 

— Sept. 10. Paris, Prague.— 12th, 18th. Prague.— 23rd. 

Brussels. — 25th. Parma, Brussels. 

— Oct. 14. Prague.— 18th. Geneva. — 25th. Prague. 

— Nov. 11. Paris.— 15th. Prague.— 18th, 19th. Brussels. 

— Dec. 1. Genoa, Prague. — 6th, 8th. Greenwich, Cam- 


bridge.— 12th. Paris.— 15th. Prague.— 
19th, 20th. Cracow.- 24th. Prague. 


Jan. 2. 



Feb. 28. 



Mar. 7. 

Guastalla.— 10th. Greenwich. 


June 11. 

Genoa. — 30th. Brussels. 


July 3. 



Sept. 6. 



Oct. 7. 

MontpelUer. — 16th. Parma. — 17th. Geneva. — 
18th. Brussels, Geneva. 


Nov. 4. 

France.— 19th. (?).— 24th. Paris. 


. Jan. 2. 


— . 

Mar. 2, 

8. Hamburg. — 13th. Parma. — 22nd. Brussels. 


April 5. 

Ghent, Hamburg. — 6th. Brussels. 


May 6. 

Paris, Rheims, Dieppe; Greenwich, Colling- 
wood ; Brussels. — 9th. Brussels. 


Aug. 2. 



Deo. 8, 

10, 12. Parma.— 29th. Paris. 


, Jan. 12, 

13, 19. Hamburg. 


Feb. 20. 



April 17. 



June 24. 

Paris (?). 


Aug. 1. 

"Whitehaven.— 9th. Hamburg.— 22nd (?). 


Nov. 14. 



Dec. 8. 

Parma. — 29th. Paris, Rheims. 


, Jan. 6. 

Nantes. — 10th. Hamburg. 


Mar. 6. 



April 25. 



July 6. 


Aug. 25. 

Parma. — 29th. Huggate, BOk, near Dussel- 
dorf. — 30th. Between Dusseldorf and 


Sept. 1. 

Drachenfels.— 24th, 25th, 26th. BUk. 


Nov. 5. 


Dec. 8. 

Nottingham, Manchester ; Eutin. — 4th. Am- 
sterdam, Bonn. — 13th. Swansea. — 14th. 
Bonn.— 29th. Rheuns. 


, Jan. 4. 



Feb. 18. 

Bonn. — 25th. Geneva. 


Mar. 14. 



Aug. 28. 


Sept. 13. 

Huggate. — 21st. Cambridge, Durham, Esk 
near Durham, Bembridge, Isle of Wight. — 
22nd. Paris, Rheims; Huggate; Bonn; 
Breslau; Saatz (Bohemia). 


Oct. 17. 

Dublin. — 24th. Monteagle (Ireland). 


1846. Nov. 3. Paris.— nth, 13th. Bonn.— 17th. Kingston, 

Bonn, Prague, Ukermark, Elberfield, Leipzig. 
Many places in North Germany, and a few 
in South Germany. — 18th. Brussels. — 21st. 

— Dec. 11. Bonn, Eolandseok. — 13th. Bonn. — 16th. 

Yorkshire ; Bonn. — 17th. Bonn. 

1847. Jan. 13, 14, Bonn. 

— Mar. 17. Eutin.— 19th. Greenwich, Hyde Vale, Cam- 

bridge, Playford near Ipswich, Darlington, 
Spalding, Wolverton, Norfolk ; Brussels, 
Emden, Hamburg, Oldenburg, Leipzig. 

— June 6. Brussels. 

— Sept. 17. Paris. — 21st. Norwich, Esk near Durham. — 

24th. North of Prance ; Greenwich, Shrop- 
shire. — 26th. Carlisle. — 28th. Louviers. — 
29th. Carlisle, Swansea, Westmoreland ; 
Brussels. — 30th. Westmoreland. 

— Oct. 3, 6, CarUsle. — 13th. Westmoreland. — 14th. 

Bonn. — 17th. Basle ; Gastein. — 28rd. 
Parma ; Brussels. — 24th. Cadiz, Spain ; 
Parma ; Paris, Bourges, &c. ; Cambridge, 
Durham, York, Swansea, Blackheath, Mont- 
eagle, Oxford, Ipswich, Greenwich, London, 
Ireland, &c. ; Brussels ; Mannheim ; Wur- 
temberg ; Leipzig. — 25th. Rouen. — 27th. 
Brighton, Cambridge, Oxford, and other parts 
of England. — 28th. Cambridge. 

— Nov. 1. Paris. — 2nd. Bonn. — 17th. MontpeUier, 

Paris. — 18th. Brussels. — 19th. Bonn, 
Leipzig. — 20th. (?). — 22nd. Leipzig.— 
25th. Eouen. 

— Deo. 8, 10, Bonn. — 16th. Baden, Wurtemberg. — 17th. 

Madrid ; Pisa, Florence ; Toulouse, Mont- 
peUier, Bordeaux, Grenoble, Bourg, Cirey, 
Saint - Symphorien - en - Laye, Bourges, la 
P^erte-sous-Jouarre, Goersdorfif, departement 
de la Seine, Blangy, Havre, almost all Prance ; 
Brussels, Amsterdam ; Basle, Neuch4tel ; 
Boim, Kirchheim ; Karlsruhe ; Freuden- 
staedt, HaUe, Calw, Stuttgart, Heilbronn, &o. ; 
Botzen, Balingen, Dresden, Leipzig ; Eutin, 
Koenigsberg. — 18th. Eutin. — 19th. Nurem- 
berg ; Dresden ; Eutin. — 20th. Bonn ; 
Eutin. — 31st. Leipzig. 

1848. Jan. 11. Mannheim.— 16th. Greenwich. — 20th. Leip- 


zig.— 25th. Goersdorff (Upper Ehine).— 
28th. Bonn ; Leipzig. 
1848. Feb. 20. Greenwich, and great part of England.— 21st. 
Milan; Bourg, Goersdorff; England; Zurich, 
Basle ; Bonn ; Wurtemberg ; Seelau, Leit- 
meritz, Purglitz, PUsen, Hohenelbe, Dresden, 
Warza, Leipzig, Pegau, Lutzen, Merseburg, 
Zeitz, &c. — 22nd. Parma; Greenwich, Dur- 
ham ; Kremsmunster, Klagenfurt ; Leit- 
meritz. Purglitz. — 24th. Atlantic, 53° 41' 
lat. N., and 18° 45' long. W.— 25th. Leit- 
meritz. — 27th. Montpelher. 

— Mar. 7. Bonn. — 15th. Stonyhurst. — 19th. Green- 

wich, Durham, England ; Bonn. — 20th. 

Greenwich, Durham, Stonyhurst. — 21st. 
England. — 28th. Leeds.— Slst. Greenwich, 

— April 2. Leipzig. — 3rd. Greenwich, England. — 5th. 

Leipzig.^eth. Brussels, Aix-la-Chapelle. — 
7th. Greenwich, England. — 17th. Green- 
wich, Stone. — 29th. Greenwich, England ; 
Leipzig and district. 

— May 11. Greenwich. 

— July 8. Atlantic, 52° 12' lat. N., and 8° 32' long. W.— 

11th. England, Atlantic, 46° 16' lat. N. and 
36° 26' long. W.— 24th. Parma. 

— Aug. 19. Portsmouth. — 28th. England.— 30th. Parma. 

— Sept. 4, 8, 18. England.— 23rd. Atlantic, 51° 16' ht. 

N., and 12° 20' long. W.— 30th. Aix-la- 

— Oct. 17. Stonyhurst ; Stubenbach ; Kremsmunster. 

— 18th. Spain ; Greenwich, Cambridge, 
Stonyhurst, &c., and many parts of England ; 
Atlantic, 49° 4' lat. N. and 19° 10' long. W. ; 
Frankfort sur-Mein ; Salzburg, Strakowitz, 
Winterberg, Kremsmunster. — 19th. Green- 
wich, Stonyhurst, various parts of England ; 
Atlantic, 50° 16' lat. N., and 13° 20' long. W., 
and 48° 35' N. lat., and 14° 2' W. long. ; Aix- 
la-Chapelle, Bonn ; Cracow. — 20th. Green- 
wich, Stonyhurst, and other parts of Eng- 
land. — 22nd. Greenwich, England; Brussels. 
Aix-la-ChapeUe, Bonn; Stubenbach. — 23rd; 
Montpellier; Atlantic, lat. 49° N., and 14° 
long.W.; Brussels; Haltimer (near Namur); 
Aix-la-Chapelle, Bonn ; Ittersdorf (Lake of 


Constance); Leipzig. — 24th. Parma; Paris; 
Greenwich, England; Brussels; Aix-la- 
Chapelle, Bonn. — 25th. Greenwich, Eng- 
land ; Brussels ; Aix-la-Chapelle ; Bonn. — 
26th. Brussels ; Aix-la-ChapeUe ; Bonn. — 
27th. Greenwich, Prestwich, England. — 
28th. Bonn.— 29th. Bonn; Leipzig.— 30th. 
Greenwich, England. — 31st. Kremsmunstor. 

1848. Nov. 5, 6. Parma.— 13th. Greenwich.— 14th. Green- 

wich, England. — 17th. Smyrna, Salonica ; 
Odessa ; Madrid, Spain ; Eome, Florence, 
Pisa, Parma, Venice, Milan ; Montpellier, 
Grenoble, Saint-Laurent-du-Pont, Bordeaux, 
Toulouse, Eodez, Bourg, Cirey, Paris, Havre, 
Dieppe, &c. ; Greenwich, Stonyhurst, Cam- 
bridge, Liverpool, Manchfister, Durham, &c. ; 
Bruges, and other places in Belgium ; Zurich, 
Basle ; Aix-la-Chapelle ; Kassel ; Stuttgart 
and other places in Wurtemberg ; Krems- 
munster, Freistadt, Leitmeritz, Schoessel, 
Strakowitz, Seelau ; Hohenelbe, Prague ; 
Stubenbach ; Dresden, Leipzig ; BerUn. — 
18th. Greenwich, Prestwich, and other parts 
of England ; Brussels ; Aix-la-ChapeUe.^ 
19th. Atlantic, lat. 50° 11' N., and 15° 30' 
W. ; Geneva ; Bonn. — 21st. Parma ; France ; 
Greenwich, Prestwich, and many parts of 
England ; Brussels ; Aix-la-ChapeUe, Bonn ; 
Leitmeritz ; Cracow. — 22nd. Leitmeritz. — 
23rd. Greenwich, England. — 24th. Parma ; 
Greenwich, England. — 25th, 26th. Green- 
wich, England. — 28th. Stubenbach. — 30th. 
Greenwich, England. 

— Dec. 10. Greenwich. — 13th. Greenwich, England ; 

Brussels ; Aix-la-ChapeUe. — 17th. Parma ; 
Prestwich; Basle; Kremsmunster ; Gottin- 
gen; Leipzig. — 21st. Atlantic, lat. 54° 8' 
N., and 26° 10' W.— 22nd, 27th, 29th. Green- 
wich, England. 

1849. Jan. 1, 3. (?).— 4th. Prestwich.— 9th, 12th, 18th. (?)— 

14th. Paris ; Prestwich, Whitehaven, 
Aylesbury, Maidenstone Hall. — 15th. Hart- 
well. — 22nd. Parma. — 27th. Smecna (Aus- 

— Feb. 18. Whitehaven, Wakefield.— 19th. Prestwich, 

Stone, Whitehaven, Wakefield; Atlantic, 


lat. 50° 43'N. and 33° 20' W. ; Basle ; Leipzig, 
— 20th. Greenwich, "Whitehaven, Hart- 
well ; Atlantic, lat. 50° 16' N. and 14° 20' W. ; 
Leipzig. — 21st. Hartwell ; Leipzig. — 22nd. 
Parma ; Montpellier ; Greenwich, Oxford, 
Holkham, Anglesbury, Stone, Norwich, 
Newcastle ; Brussels, Waremme, Liege ; 
Borni ; Basle ; XJlm. — 28rd. Whitehaven, 
Hartwell; Bonn.— 24th, 25th. Bonn.— 
26th. Aix-la-ChapeUe. — 27th. Montpelier; 
Greenwich ; Brussels ; Aix - la - ChapeUe, 
Bonn, Pegau ; Mergentheim, and other 
parts of Wurtemberg ; Pilsen. 

1849. Mar. 16, 17. Aix-la-ChapeUe.— 18th. Stone. 

— May 13. Atlantic,5]°15'N.andl5°20'W.— 31st. Stone. 

— June 15. Stone. — 26th, 30th. Latimer. 

— Aug. 11. Parma.— 18th. Whitehaven.— 29th. (?). 

— Sept. 3. Latimer. — 16th. Stonyhurst. — 27th. Bonn; 


— Oct. 1. Whitehaven. — 15th. Cambridge, Stonyhurst. 

21st. Aix-la-ChapeUe. — 22nd. Greenwich, 
Carlington ; Aix-la-ChapeUe, Bonn ; Mer- 
gentheim ; Winterberg, Juterbogk ; Leipzig. 
— 23rd. Bonn. — 24th. Bruxelles, Bonn. 

— Nov. 5. Bonn ; Senftenberg. — 9th. BruxeUes. 19th. 

Boim. — 24th. Senftenberg. 

— Dec. 14. Berne. 

1850. Jan. 5. Greenwich. — 19th. Atlantic, lat. 50° N. and 

26° 20' W.— 30th. HartweU.— 31st. Atlantic, 
on the route between Liverpool and New 

— Feb. 3. Atlantic, lat. 53° 30' N. and 35° 20' W.— 6th. 

Whitehaven, Stonyhurst, Durham. — 9th. 
Manchester. — 10th. Stone. — 11th. Aix- 
la Ghapelle. — 12th. Durham. — 18th. Aix- 
la-ChapeUe. — 23rd. Parma; Senftenberg. 

— Mar. 9. Whitehaven.— 10th. Nottingham, Stony- 

hurst. — 11th. Greenwich, Stonyhurst.— r 
27th. Bose Hill near Oxford. — 28th. 
Stone. — 29th. Stone, Leeds. 

— April 5. Whitehaven. — 6th. Durham.— 26th. Senf- 


— May 12. Oxford, Aylesbury, Stonyhurst, Durham; 


— June 4. Beigern near Briinn. — 5th. Nottingham, 

Highfield House.— 13th. Oxford, Hartwell 


House, Rose Hill near Oxford ; Bonn. — 
26th. Manchester.— 27tli. Nottingham, 

1850. July 5. Norwich. — 12th. Norwich, Nottingham. — 

27th. Atlantic, lat. 51° N. and 19°' W.— 
28th. Atlantic, lat. 52° N. and 16° W. 

— Aug. 6, 21. Stone. 

— Sept. 6, 10. Nottingham. — 13th. Nottingham, Haw- 

arden ; Hamburg. — 14th. Stone. — 18th. 
Parma, Hartwell, Stone. 

— Oct, 1. Greenwich, Cambridge, Saint-Ives, Hunts, 

Stone, Grantham, Liverpool, Manchester, 
Durham, Whitehaven, &c. ; Hamburg. — 
2nd. Ostend, Namur, Aix-la-ChapeUe, 
Bonn ; Hambiurg. — 3rd. Hamburg. — 5th. 
Eose Hill near Oxford.— 8th, 9th. Holi- 
ham. — 10th. Ebae Hill. — 15th. Manches- 
ter.— 29th. Stonyhurst, North Shields. 

— Nov. 2. Midhurst.— 3rd, 4th. Eose HiU.— 9th, 10th. 

Jersey.— 12th. Holkham.— 14th, 15th, 16th. 
Parma. — 21st. Cambridge. 

— Dec. 23, 26. Holkham.— 27th. Hartwell, Midhurst, 

Holkham, Whitehaven. 

1851. Jan. 1, 5. Hawarden. — 9th. Highfield House near Not- 

tingham. — 24th. Stonyhurst. 

— Feb. 1. Eose Hill, Stonyhurst, Highfield House.— 

2nd. Bonn. — 5th. Durham, North Shields, 
Atlantic, lat. 49° N. and 24° W.— 6th. Eose 
Hill.— 7th. Stone.— 8th. Atlantic, 51° N. 
and 31° W.— 10th. Atlantic, lat. 51° N. 
and 30° W.— 11th. Jersey.- 18th. Grant- 
ham, Stone ; Basle. — 19th. Hawarden, 
Durham. — 20th. Hawarden. — 23rd. Dur- 
ham. — 24th. Hawarden. 

— Mar. 7. Stone, Hartwell Eectory. — 8th. Stone.— 10th. 

North Shields.— 14th. Durham.— 18th. 

— April 7. Leeds. — 18th. Nottingham. — 21st. Hawarden, 


— May 15. Whitehaven. 

— June 19, 20. Nottingham. 

— Aug. 10. (?).— 13th, 14th. Stone.— 21st. Nottingham. 

— 24th. Hawarden, North Shields ; Leip- 
zig; Cracow. — 29th. Atlantic, par 51° N. 
and 13° W.— 30th. Stonyhurst, White- 


1851. Sept. 4. Kew. — 6th. Durham, Whitehaven. — 7th, 

Whitehaven. — 14th. Hartwell Eeotory, 
Whitehaven. — iSth. Stone, Hartwell Eeo- 
tory, Nottingham, Gainsborough, Stony- 
hnrst, Harpham, Whitehaven, Durham, 
Yorkshire.— 22nd, 24th, 26th. Aix-la-Cha- 
pelle (traces). — 27th. Hawarden, Durham. — 
28th. Norwich, Harpham, Durham.— 29th. 
Cardington, Hartwell Bectory, Hartwell 
House, Maidenstone HUl, Stone, Netting- 
ham, Wakefield, Durham, North Shields ; 
Purglitz ; Calw, Stuttgart, Boeblingen, 
Vaihingen. — 30th. Nottingham, Yorkshire j 
Prague ; Camenz, Neunkirchen, Leipzig. 

— Oct. 2. Maidenstone HOI, Oxford, Cardington, Nor- 

wich, Nottingham, Stonyhurst, Whitehaven, 
Durham, North Shields, Yorkshire ; Brux- 
elles, Namur, Ostend ; Aix-la-Chapelle, 
Bonn ; Senftenherg, Dresden, Neunkirchen, 
Varsovie. — Srd. Cardington, Nottingham, 
Aix-la-Chapelle. — 4th. Nottingham, Dur- 
ham. — 13th. Audieme (Finisterre). — 14th, 
15th. Stonyhurst. — 18th. Durham, Bonn. 
—28th. Wakefield, Stonyhurst, Durham, 
Whitehaven, North Shields.— 29th. Hart- 
well Eectory, Nottingham, Wakefield. 

— Nov. 4. Aylesbury, Nottingham. — 5th, 6th, 13th. 

Stonyhurst. — 17th. Verden sur I'Aller. — 
20th. Aylesbury ; Verden. — 21st. Ayles- 
bury.— 26th. Stonyhurst.— 30th. Verden. 

— Deo. 6. Wakefield, Durham, Hawarden, Liverpool, 

North Shields.— 8th. Hawarden. — 13th. 
Aix-la-Chapelle. — 18th, 21st. Verden. — 
22nd. Stonyhurst, Whitehaven, Notting- 
ham, Hawarden, Durham, North Shields. — 
23rd. Whitehaven.— 25th. Verden.— 28th. 
Grantham ; Gembloux, near Namur. — 29th. 
North Shields, Grantham, Stonyhurst. — 
31st. Osnabruok. 

1852. Jan. 2. Cracow.— Srd. Verden.— 4th. North Shields. 

— 17th. Durham. — 19th. Bonn, Saar- 
bruck, Birkenfeld, Elberfeld; Berne; Ver- 
den; Leipzig. — 20th. Falmouth; Atlantic, 
lat. 49° N. and 11° W.— 21st. Aylesbury, 
Durham. — 22nd. Hartwell Eectory.— 23rd. 
Oxford, Hatton, Hartwell Eeotory, Carding- 


ton, Grantham, Gainsborough, Hawarden, 
Durham. — 25th. Durham, Hawarden, Man- 
chester, Stonyhurst ; Verden. — 30th.- Eose 
Hill, Thame, North Shields. 
1852. Feb. 4. Highfield House.— 15th. Greenwich, all Eng- 
land between Sl° and 55° N.— 16th. Green- 
wich. — 17th. Greenwich, Durham, High- 
field House, North Shields. — 18th. Green- 
wich, all England between 50° and 57° 
N. ; Salzhausen ; Breslau, Verden. — 19th. 
All England between 49° and 57° N. ; Bonn ; 
Berne ; Heilbronn, Calw ; Husum ; Eutin ; 
Altona ; Vienna ; many parts of Germany ; 
Preny (Poland.) — 20th. Greenwich ; Hel- 
ston, Norwich ; Atlantic, lat. 51° N. 
and 17° W. ; Holitsch, Vienna ; Cracow ; 
Verden. — 21st. Whitehaven, Durham, 
Gainsborough, Wakefield, Stonyhurst, Hel- 
Bton, Grantham, Highfield House, Glasgow. 
—22nd. Highfield House ; Verden.— 23rd. 
Stonyhurst, Durham.— 25th, 26th. High- 
field House. — 27th. Durham, North Shields. 
—28th. Aylesbury. 

— Mar. 2, 5. Highfield House.— 12th, 15th. Verden.— 

17th. Coast of Essex between Blaokwater 
and Crouch Eiver. — 20th. Stonyhurst. — 
21st. Hawarden, Saint-Ives. — 25th. Stony- 
hurst. — 26th. Bonn ; Leipzig. — 28th. 
Highfield House. — 31st. Stonyhurst. 

— April 1. Atlantic, lat. 51° N. and 9° W.— 8th. Verden. 

—9th, 11th. Stonyhurst.— 13th. Verden.— 
14th. Glasgow.— 15th. Atlantic, lat. 47° 
N. and 31° W.— 18th. Stonyhurst.- 20th. 
Bose Hill.— 21st. Oxford, Highfield House. 
—22nd, 23rd, 26th. Highfield House. 

— May 1. Stone. — 2nd. Stone, HartweU Eectory. — 3rd. 

Hartwell Eectory, Highfield. 

— June 11. Greenwich.— 19th. Stone.— 24th. Highfield 


— July 3, 6. England.— 10th. Munster.— 13th, 14th. Eng- 


— Aug. 8. Atlantic, lat. 47° N. and 23° W.— 10th. Bonn ; 

Munster, Verden. — 22nd. Laupen, near 

— Sept. 4. Parma— 11th. England.— 12th, 13th. Verden. 

—17th. England; Verden.— 18th, 19th, 


20th. England.— 2l8t. England; Verden. 
—29th. Paris. 

1852. Oct. 5. Stone.— 10th, 13th. Verden.— 18th. Stutt- 

gart; Verden.— 23rd, 24th, 25th, 26th. 

— Nov. 3. Stone, Oxford, Nottingham, Liverpool. — 7th. 

Hawarden. — 8th. Stonyhurst. — 10th. Er- 
langen. — 11th. Alsace ; Lewisham, Green- 
wich; Basle, Lausanne, Coire, Grisons; 
Platinate ; Karlsruhe, Mannheim, Stuttgart 
and all "Wurtemberg; Salzburg, Vienna; 
Neunkirchen, Erlangen, Odenwald, Salz- 
hausen ; Breslau. — 12th. Linz ; Cracow. — 
13th. Brunn.— 17th. Senftenberg.— 18th. 
Stone. — 80th. Liverpool. 

— Deo. 6. Erlangen ; Vienna. — 8th. Erlangen.— 9th. 

Bose Hill.— 12th. Stone.— 14th. Erlangen.' 
— 15th. Grantham. — 18th. Parma. — 20th. 

1853. Jan. 2. Paris. — 4th, 5th. Hawarden.— 7th. Clifton, 

Bose HUl, Stonyhurst; Erlangen. — 8th. 
Stonyhurst.— 12th. Erlangen.— 15th. Clif- 
ton. — 31st. Durham, Grantham. 

— Feb. 44. Whitehaven.— 15th. Nottingham.— 16th, 17th. 

North Shields.— 23rd. Nottingham.— 27th. 
Nottingham, Hawarden, Stonyhurst, WTiite- 
haven. — 28th. Stone, HartweU Eectory. 

— Mar. 7. Midhurst, Clifton, Hawarden, Durham ; Atlan- 

tic, lat. 51° N. and 21° W.— 8th. CUfton, 
Stonyhurst, Durham. — 17th. Stone, Bices- 
ter, HartweU Eectory. — 21st. Holkham. — 
29th. Stone. 

— April 5. Greenwich, Stone, HartweU House ; Atlantic, 

50° N. and 80° W. ; Munster.— 6th. Ha- 
warden, Darlen. — 7th. Stone, HartweU 
Eectory, Hawarden. — 8th. Hawarden, 
Stonyhurst, Durham. — 24th. Hawarden. 

— May 4. Hawarden, North Shields. — 14th. Manchester. 

— 24th. Nottingham. 

— June 22. Greenwich. 

— July 2. Venice ; Biel (Hesse-Nassau). — 12th. Ha- 

warden; Vienna. 

— Aug. 20, 26, 80. Hawarden. 

— Sept. 1. Greenwich. — 2nd. Greenwich, Exeter, CUfton, 

Warrington, Liverpool, Manchester, York 
Cambridge, Durham, Hawarden, Makree, 


Dublin ; Prague ; Hamburg, Angela. — 3rd. 
Clifton.— 28th, SOtli. Durham. 

1853. Oct 17. Durham. — 25th. Nottingham, Durham.— 

29th. 'Whitehaven.— 30th. Paris (?).— 31st. 
Cherbourg ; AmpthiU (Bedfordshire) and 
many parts of England ; Munster ; Koenigs- 

— Nov. 1. Oxford; Munster. — 2nd. Whitehaven. — 7th. 

Leipzig. — 8th. Isle of Man, Durham, 
North Shields.— 9th. Nottingham.— 10th. 
Leipzig. — 22nd. North Shields, Isle of 
Man, Durham, Stone, Stonyhurst ; Leipzig. 
—30th. Weischlitz. 

— Dec. 5. Helston, Nottingham. — 6th. Durham, Truro, 

Clifton, Lewisham, Greenwich, Stonyhurst, 
Isle of Man, "Whitehaven, North Shields. — 
8th. Durham.— 23rd. Greenwich. — 24th. 
Clifton ; Senftenberg. — 25th. Senftenberg. — 
26th. Falmouth; Senftenberg.— 27th. Fal- 
mouth. — 28th. Warrington. — 29th. Jersey ; 
Clifton.— 30th. Jersey. 

1854. Jan. 2. Eome : Kcenigsberg. — 31st. Greenwich. 

— Feb. 10. Parma. — 26th. Greenwich. 

— April 13. Greenwich ; Xanten am Ehin; Munster; Ham- 


— June 24. Parma. 

— July 15. Senftenberg. 

— Sept. 14. Clays, near Amiens.— 26th. Paris. 

— Oct. 15. (?). 

1855. Mar. 17. Berne. 

— May 20 (?). 

— Oct. 16, 18. Greenwich. 

— Dec. 3. Atlantic, lat. 49° N. and 44° W. 

1856. Feb. 1. Glarus (?), perhaps the zodiacal light. — 3rd. 


— Mar. 12. Senftenberg. 

— June 2, 3, 4. Paris. 
— ■ Dec. 8. Hanau. 

1857. Nov. 22. Klosters (Switzerland). 

— • Dec. 17. Brussels ; Bretten, Bruchsal, and aU the West 
of Wurtemberg. 

1858. Mar. 9. Bonn; Putbus, Altona. — 11th. Bonn. — 13th. 

Oxford. — 14th. Oxford, Armagh. 

— April 1. Bose Hill. — 9th. Munster ; Gottingen ; Nau- 

gard ; Senftenberg, Dresden ; Breslau. — 10th. 
Oxford, and many parts of England. — 11th- 


Clifton.— 12th. SiUoth; Munster.— 21st. 
Paris.— 24th. Fairlight.— 29 th. Clifton. 

1858. May 2, 6. Clifton.— 7th. Oxford, Clifton.— 8th, 10th. 


— June 6. Oxford. 

— Deo. 4. South of France ; Wurtemberg, Munster, Halle, 

and other parts of Germany ; Prague, Jung- 
bunzlau ; Kremsmunster, Gaedonek, near 
Goch, — 31st. Havre. 

1859. Jan. 22. Helston.— 23rd. Bose HiU.— 29th, 30th, 31st. 


— Feb. 2. Athens. — 9th. Many parts of England. — 11th, 

12th, 14th. (?).— 18th, 19th. Naugard.— 
22nd. Oxford, and many parts of England. 
— 23rd. Oxford, and many parts of England ; 
Prague; Munster; Naugard, Saalz, Ham- 
burg, Eendsburg. — 24th. Oxford and many 
parts of England; Naugard. — 25th. Notting- 
ham, Stonyhurst. — 26th. Clifton ; Munich. 

— Mar. 2. Rose Hill. — 25th. Saint-Paul's Parsonage. — 

26th. Oxford and many parts of England. — 
27th. Nottingham, Hawarden. — 29th. Ha- 
warden. — 30th. Many parts of England.^ 
31st. Saint-Paul's Parsonage. 

— April 1. Eng'and. — 7th. Paris. — 14th. Armagh. — 21st. 

MontpeUier, Paris ; Greenwich ; Brussels ; 
Vienna, Kremsmunster ; Cracow, Prague ; 
Munich, Bamberg; HaUe, Dessau, Hoefgen 
near Grimma; Dresden, Oberwiesenthal, 
Leipzig ; Berlin ; Breslau. — 22nd. Brussels ; 
Munster, Gaesdonk. — 23rd. Kremsmunster ; 
Munster. — 28th. England.— 29th. Laer 
(Westphalie) ; Kremsmunster. 

— May 1, 5. England. — 31st. Athens. 

— July 15. Wewelinghofen (Bhenish Prussia). 

— Aug. 2. (?). — 28th. Athens; Kome, Parma; Mont 

pellier, Lyons, Paris, Saint- Valery ; Noy 
eUes-sur-Mer ; London, Brighton, Clif' 
ton, and all England ; Atlantic, lat. 26° N, 
and 29° W., and lat. 51° N. and 13° W. 
Brussels ; all Holland ; Geneva, Basle, Eafz, 
Neuch&tel; Ittendorf (lake of Constance) 
Schemnitz (Hungary) ; Vienna, Olmutz, 
Prague; Bodenbach, Schossle, Bamberg, 
Neunkirchen, Stuttgart; Leipzig, Saxony, 
&c., and in general all Germany. — 29th, 


Dunkirk; Prague.— 30th, 31st. Grant- 
ham ; Visehel near Altenahr. 

1859. Sept. 1. Grantham; Prague; Cracow. — 2nd. Athens; 

Eome ; Clifton, Durham ; Kremsmunster ; 
Cracow. — 3rd. Athens; Clifton, Durham; 
Kremsmunster ; Cracow ; Hamburg and 
all Northern Germany ; Kosnigsberg, Cranz, 
near Kosnigsberg. — 4th. Tottenham, Clifton, 
Durham, Grantham, Newmark. — 5th. Nau- 
gard. — 6th. Munster ; Hamburg, Naugard. 
— 24th. Venice; Greenwich, South of Eng- 
land ; Holland ; Kremsmunster ; Prague ; 
Wurtemberg ; Cologne, Crefeld, Hulsen near 
Crefeld, Munster, Hamm, Elberfeld ; Soest, 
Lippstadt, Heiligenstadt. — 25th. Munster. 
—27th. Hamburg. 

— Oct. 1. Toulouse, Lyon, Yzeure (Allier), Bois des 

Fosses, Paris ; Greenwich, Limerick, South 
coast of England ; Basle ; Prague ; Kreuz- 
naoh ; Kremsraunster ; Sankt - "Wendel, 
Munich ; Naugard, Munster, Gaesdonck, 
Hamburg; Anspach. — 2nd. Madrid; Cas- 
tera near Toulouse ; Prague ; Kassel. — 10th. 
Amiens. — 12th. Athens ; Naples, Eome ; 
MontpeUier, Lyons, Yzeure, la Chaux-de- 
Fonds, Saint-Am6 (Vosges),Eouen, Amiens ; 
Southampton, Greenwich, Oxford; Luxem- 
burg, Brussels, Namur; Berne, Neuch^tel; 
Frankfort- on- the-Main, Kremsmunster ; 
Cracow ; Wurtemberg ; Kassel ; Dresden, 
Leipzig ; Putbus ; Berlin, Lichtenberg, near 
Berhn, Hervest, near Dorsten, Naugard, 
Stettin.— 13th, 14th. Naugard.— 15th. La 
Turbie, near Monaco. — 17th. Paris; Green- 
wich, Oxford. — 18th. Athens ; Vienna. — 
19th. Paris; Greenwich. — 23rd. Eeutlingen. 
—24th. Atlantic, lat. 47° N. and 15° W. ; 

— Deo. 6. Eome. — 13th. Oxford ; Naugard. — 21st. 

Gresten (Austria). 

1860. Jan. 1. Louvain. 

— Feb. 12. Nottingham; Peckeloh. — 23rd. Leipzig. 

— Mar. 12, 18, 22, 25. Nottingham.— 26th. Dresden. 

— April 9. Paris ; Greenwich, Nottingham ; Brussels ; 

Wurtemberg, Munster, all Westphalia, Kre- 
feld, Hamm, Wiedenbruck, Hamburg. — 


10th. Paris.— 12th. Paris; Hamburg.— 
ISth. Hamburg. — 16th. Nottingham ; 

1860. May 9. Oxfotd. 

— Aug. 7. Clermont-Ferrand; Vienna; Prague; Berlin. 

— 8th. Athens ; Clermont-Ferrand ; Munich, 
Naugard. — 9th. Athens ; Paris ; Brussels ; 
Kremsmunster ; Prague; Dresden, Brauns- 
berg; Emden, Naugard, Liohtenberg near 
BerUn, Lauenburg (Pomerania). — 10th. 
Athens ; Nantes, Paris ; Brussels ; Nor- 
derney ; Dresden. — 11th. Athens ; Paris ; 
Prague ; Peckeloh.— 12th. Athens ; Paris ; 
Yverdon ; Kremsmunster, Vienna. — 13th. 
Athens ; Emden, Westphalia. — 14th. Athens. 
—25th. Athens; Oelde (Westphalia).— 27th. 
Westphalia.— 80th. Gouda (Holland). 

— Sept. 6. Utrecht ; Leipzig ; Peckeloh. — 7th. Paris ; 

Utrecht.— 8th. Peckeloh. 

— Oct. 1. Kreuznach. — 19th. Putbus. 

— Nov. 2. Nottingham. 

— Dec. 8. Munster; Peckeloh. 

1861. Jan. 24. Le Lochle ; Munster, Peckeloh, Coesfeld, 

Elberfeld, Gaesdonck. 

— Feb. 12. Prague. — 27th. Greenwich; Prague. 

— Mar. 1. Oxford. — ^2nd. Groninguen ; Peckeloh. — 4th. 

Athens. — 8th. Munster. — 9th. Montpellier, 
Paris ; Greenwich, Oxford ; Brussels, 
Louvain, Nimeguen, Flushing, Delle, Ooster- 
huizen, Workum, Utrecht, Slijk-Ewijk ; 
Geneva,, Avenches, Saint-Aubin, 
Lucerne ; Kremsmunster ; Prague, Gitschin, 
Koeniggroetz ; Saarbruck, Elsfleth, Gaes- 
donck, Munster, Mannheim ; Wurtemberg ; 
Peckeloh, Ehine, Berlin, Neumarck, Loebau, 
Liibeck, Putbus, Dessau ; Cracow. — 19th. 
Gitschin. — 25th. Prague. 

— April 7. Oxford ; Slijk-Bwijk. — 15th. Slijk-Eyrijk, 

Workum ; Munster, Peckeloh ; Berlin. — 
24th. Munster.— 25th, 28th, 29th. Prague. 

— Aug. 12. Yverdon. 

— Sept. 11. Munster. — 25th. Workum. 

— Oct. 2. Utrecht.— 10th. Brussels, Utrecht ; Peckeloh. 

— 12th. Greenwich. 
Nov. 3. Liohtenberg, near Berlin. — 5th. Peckeloh. — 


7th. Oxford ; Ouddorp ; Peckeloh, Liehten- 
berg, Ebstorf, Naugard. — 24th. Oxford. 

1861. Dec. 2. Prague ; Dessau. — 3rd. Peckeloh. — 4th. 

Greenwich ; Delle, Workum, Helder, Noord 
Hinder near Gaesdonck, Peckeloh, Naugard; 
Carrow near Mecklenberg. — 19th. Dresden. 
—20th. Basle.— 23rd, 24th. Dresden.— 
26th. Dresden, Peckeloh. 

1862. Jan. 17. Lichtenberg. — 18th. Peckeloh; Lichtenberg. 

—22nd, 23rd, 26th. Lichtenberg. 

— Feb. 8. Lichtenberg, Peckeloh. — 18th. Peckeloh.— 

21st. Workum, Ouddorp, Helder, Noord- 
Hinder ; Munster, Gaesdonk, Peckeloh. — 
22nd. Athens.— 27th. Peckeloh. 

— Mar. 1. Lichtenberg, Peckeloh. — 3rd. Peckeloh. — 4th. 

Munster; Peckeloh.— 5th, 8th, 13th. Pecke- 
loh.— 14th. Athens.— 24th, 25th, 27th, 28th, 
29th. Lichtenberg. 

— April 2, 3. Peckeloh.- 13th. Paris. 

— May 1. Milan; Peckeloh. — 2nd. Peckeloh. — 3rd. 

Milan. — 18th. Wilna. — 19th. Milan ; 
Munster; Wilna.— 20th. Milan; Wihia. 

— June 4. Noord-Hinder. — 5th. Brouwershaven. 

— July 19. Senftenberg (Bohemia). ^ — 26th. Peckeloh. — 

27th. Milan ; Peckeloh, Leipzig.— 28th. 
Peckeloh. — 29th. Leipzig. 

— Aug. 4. Milan ; Paris ; Ootmarsum ; Munich ; Munster, 

Peckeloh. — 19th. Noord-Hinder ; Peckeloh. 
—20th. Peckeloh.— 21st. Milan.— 24th, 
25th, 27th. Peckeloh. — 28th. Milan; 
Senftenberg; Peckeloh; Naugard.— 29th. 

r ftp. K fll On 

— Sept. 2, 11, 13, 15, 16, 18. Peckeloh.— 24th. Senftenberg, 

Naugard, Peckeloh.— 29th, 30th. Peckeloh. 

— Oct. 6. Peckeloh.— 9th. Utrecht; Peckeloh.— 11th. 

Montpellier.— 15th, 17th. Peckeloh.— 24th. 
Worthmgton (?).— 28th, 31st. Peckeloh. 

— Nov. 19, 29. Peckeloh. 

— Dec. 4. Peckeloh. — 14th. Borne, Bologna, Bergamo, 

Parenzo, Trieste; Marseilles, Montpelher, 
Puychamaud (Dordogne), Limoges, Bellao, 
Paris ; Greenwich, Queenstown ; Brussels, 
Antwerp, Ghent, all Holland ; Geneva, 
Neuohatel, Basle, Zurich, Ittendorf; Co- 
blentz, Munster, Peckeloh; Wurtemberg; 


Leipzig, Salzhausen, Liohtenberg. — 15th. 
Horst (Holland). — 22nd. Lichtenberg. — 
25th. Emden, Mannheim, Breslau. 
18C3. Jan. 7, 9. Peckeloh.— 12th. Lyon.— 15th. Mannheim. 
—25th. Noord-Hinder. 

— Feb. 9. Berlin. — 10th. Mannheim. — 14th, 17th. 

Peckeloh. — 22nd. Utrecht, Noord-Hinder ; 
Ludingen (Hanover). 

— Mar. 3, 4, 18, 21. Peckeloh. 

— April 1, 7, 9, 10, 19. Peckeloh. 

— May 1. Peckeloh. — 6th. Leeuwarden. — 9th. Peckeloh; 


— June 22. Peckeloh.— 23rd. Noord-Hinder. 

— Aug. 9. Mannheim. — 17th. Munster. 

— Sept. 20. Peckeloh. 

— Oct. 7, 8. Peckeloh.— 11th. Munster.— 25th. Peckeloh. 

— Nov. 1, 2. Peckeloh. — 9th. Utrecht; Munster; Peckeloh. 

— 10th. Lichtenberg. — 11th. Peckeloh ; 
Lichtenberg.— 13th. Athens.— 18th, 20th. 
Peckeloh. — 29th. Munster; Peckeloh. 

— Deo. 4. Peckeloh. — 10th, 11th. Athens. — 14th. 

Munster ; Dresden ; Peckeloh ; Berlin. — 
18th. Peckeloh. 
1864. Jan. 6, 14, 16, 17. Peckeloh. 

— Feb. 1. Zurich.- 9th. Berlin.— 14th, 17th. Peckeloh. 

— Mar. 6. Peckeloh.— 7th, 8th, 9th. Lichtenberg.— 10th. 

Munster ; Naugard ; Peckeloh ; Berlin, 
Lichtenberg. — 14th. Hanover. — 18th, 22nd, 
25th. Peckeloh. 

— April 2. Lichtenberg. — 5th. Munster; Peckeloh. — 8th. 

Lichtenberg.— 16th, 20th. Peckeloh.— 27th. 
Munster ; Naugard ; Peckeloh. — 30th. 

— May 3. Peckeloh.— 9th. Cracow.— 12th. Peckeloh. 

— June 12, 13. Peckeloh.— 18th. Lisbon. 

— July 10. Zurich.- 12th, 28th. Peckeloh. 

— Aug. 1, 2. Kephissia near Athens. — 5th. Peckeloh. — Athens — 9th. Kephissia. — 17th. 
Munster; Peckeloh.— 31st. Naugard. 

— Sept. 13, 14. Peckeloh.— 25th. Peckeloh ; Aardenburg. 

—27th, 29th. Peckeloh. 

— Oct. 7. Westphalia. — 8th. Munster, Westphalia ; 

Naugard ; Peckeloh. — 11th. Munster. — 
15th. Lichtenberg.— 19th. Valentia (Ire- 
land) ; Peckeloh ; Lichtenberg.— 2lBt. Paris. 
—25th. Peckeloh. 


1864. Nov. 2, 7. Peckeloh.— 9th. Mimster; Peckeloh.— 23ra. 

Peckeloh. — 29th. Munster ; Peckeloh. — 
30th. JuUers. 

— Deo. 11. Peckeloh.— 18th, 22nd. Lichtenberg.— 23rd. 

Munster ; Peckeloh. — 24th. Frankenthal 
(Rhenish Bavaria) ; Munster.— 29th, 30th, 
31st. Liohtenberg. 

1865. Jan. 6. Munster.— 9th. Borne.— 12th. Peckeloh.— 

17th. Marseilles ; Munster ; Peckeloh ; 
Lichtenberg.— 24th. Marseilles; Munster. 
— 25th. Leeuwarden. — 27th. Paris. — 29th, 
30th. Liohtenberg. 

— Feb. 15. Peckeloh. — 17th. Greenwich ; Cork ; Munster ; 

Peckeloh ; Lichtenberg. — 18th. Naugard ; 
Liohtenberg. — 21st. Peckeloh. — 22nd. 
Peckeloh ; Lichtenberg, — 23rd, 27th. Lich- 

— Mar. 4. Peckeloh. — 7th. Gorcy near Metz. — 18th. 

Bamberg ; Peckeloh. — 19th. Lichtenberg. 
— 20th. Greenwich ; Munster ; Peckeloh ; 
Naugard ; Liohtenburg. — 21st, 22nd. Bam- 
berg; Lichtenberg.^23rd. Lichtenberg. 

— April 8, 9, 16. Peckeloh.- 28th. Berne. 

— June 17. Athens.— 28th. Peckeloh. 

— July 18. Mimster.- 19th. Peckeloh. 

— Aug. 2. Munster ; Peckeloh ; Sudenburg near Magde- 

burg.— 13th, 14th. Peckeloh.— 18th. Leeu- 
warden. — 19th. Mimster ; Papenburg. — 
25th. Peckeloh.— 26th. Ostend; Munster; 
Peckeloh; Papenburg. 

— Sept. 16, 21, 22. Peckeloh.— 26th. Papenburg. 

— Oct. 13, 14, 28, 31. Peckeloh. 

— Nov. 7. Holder. — 8th. Vend6me ; Valentia. — 9th. 

Papenburg. — 14th. Munster ; Peckeloh ; 

1866. Jan. 4. Peckeloh. — 6th, 12th. Lichtenberg. — 29th. 


— Feb. 6. Peckeloh ; Liohtenberg. — 7th. North Shields, 

By well ; Papenbui-g ; Liohtenberg. — 9th. 
Peckeloh. — 12th. Greenwich; North Shields. 
—13th. N. Shields.— 15th. Lichtenberg. 

— Mar. 7. Peckeloh ; Papenburg ; Lichtenberg. — 8th. 

Lichtenberg. — 14th. Peckeloh ; Liohtenberg. 
— 15th. Lichtenberg. — 16th. Peckeloh. — 
17th. Paris.— 20th. Peckeloh. 

— April 8. Lichtenberg.— 9th, 23rd, 26th. Peckeloh. 


1866. May 14, 19. Peckeloh. 

— June 13. Peckeloh. 

— July 15. Peckeloh. 

— Aug. 11. Peckeloh.— 14th. Atlantic, lat. 54° N. and 

long 24° W. 

— Sept. 2, 4, 8. Peckeloh. 

— Oct. 1,2. Peckeloh; Lichtenberg. — 3rd. Munster; 

Peckeloh ; Lichtenberg. — 4th. Peckeloh ; 
Lichtenberg. — 5th. Munster; Lichtenberg. 
— 6th. Lichtenberg.— 8th, 10th. Peckeloh. 
—11th. Lichtenberg.— 14th, 22nd, 23rd, 
25th. Peckeloh. 

— Nov. 1. Munster; Peckeloh. — 4. Lichtenberg. — 10th. 

Brussels; Munster. — 11th. North Shields, 
Allenheads. — 12th. Lichtenberg. — 19th. 
Allenheads.— 24th, 25th. Peckeloh.— 26th. 
Peckeloh ; Hamburg ; Papenburg ; Lichten- 
berg. — 27th. Lichtenberg. — 28th. Munster. 
—29th. By weR ; Lichtenberg.— 30th. Lich- 

— Deo. 8, 10. Lichtenberg. — 25th. Allenheads, Bywell. — 

30th. Lichtenberg. 

1867. Jan. 28. Marseilles; Platta (Switzerland). 

— Mar. 21. Peckeloh. 

— May 3. Peckeloh.— 4th. Pussen.— 17th. Tarifa.— 

19th. Peckeloh.— 23rd. Neuchatel. (Swit- 
zerland) (doubtful).— 25th. Peckeloh. 

— June 12. Cracow. 

— July a. Peckeloh. 

— Aug. 26. Peckeloh. 

— Sept. 12. Peckeloh.— 25th. Lichtenberg.— 26th. Pec- 

keloh; Lichtenberg. 

— Oct. 21, 22, 26. Lichtenberg.- 27th. Peckeloh.— 28th. 

Peckeloh ; Lichtenberg. — 30th. Lichten- 

— Nov. 2. Peckeloh.— 27th, 28th. Lichtenberg. 

— Dec. 2. Lichtenberg. 

1868. April 2. Peckeloh.— 20th. Ireland. 

— May 20. Greenwich. 

— Oct. 22. Munster; Peckeloh. 

— Nov. 14. Peckeloh. — 19th. Munster; Peckeloh. 

— Dec. 4, 12, 14. Lichtenberg. 

1869. Jan. 7. Peckeloh.— 11th, 12th. Lichtenberg. 

— Feb. 3. Greenwich; Naugard; Koeslin; Danzig; 

Putbus. — 5th. Breslau. — 14th. Padua, 


1869. Mar. 6, 7, 12, 13, 31. Peckeloh. 

— April 1, 2. Peckeloh.— 15th. Paris and the greater part 

of France from south to north; London, 
Greenwich, Liverpool; Brussels, Utrecht, 
the whole of Holland; Zurich, Altorf, 
Gersau, Eiasiedeln, AltstEetten, Saint- 
Gall, Brienz ; Sankt-Gyorgyi (Hungary) ; 
Chlumetz ; Munich ; Munster ; Peckeloh, 
and many parts of Germany. — 16th. Green- 
wich ; Danzig. — 17th. Liohtenberg. 

— May 5. Peckeloh.— 8th. Borne.— 9th. Danzig. — 13th. 

Azores ; Athens ; Bome, Leghorn, Venice, 
Padua ; Trieste, Pola, Lesina, Zombor ; . 
Paris and the north of Prance ; Greenwich, 
tilanrwst, Shrewsbury, Manchester ; Brus- 
sels ; Amsterdam, Workum, and the whole 
of Holland; Splugen, San-Vittore, Sils 
Maria, Groeohen, Vaudens, Einsiedeln, 
Schwyz, Berne and all the north of Switzer- 
land, Buda, Altenburg (Hungary) ; Vienna, 
Baden near Vienna, Ischl, Goerz, Laibach, 
Gratwein ; Cologne, Munster ; Hamburg ; 
Munich ; Peckeloh, Berlin, Lichtenberg, 
&c.— 14th, 15th. Paris.— 29th. Hungary. 

— June 7. Peckeloh. — 29th. Greenwich. 

— July 29. Zurich. 

— Aug. 6. Zurich. — 10th. Athens. 

— Sept. 3. Greenwich ; Lichtenberg. — 4th. Munster ; 

Peckeloh. — 5th. Paris ; Danzig. — 11th. 
Peckeloh ; Lichtenberg. — 22nd. Danzig. 
—25th. Lichtenberg. — 27th, 28th, 29th. 

— Oct. 1, 3, 5. Munster. — 6th. Paris ; London, Green- 

wich; Brussels, Louvain; Aix-la-ChapeUe; 
Munster; Flensburg, Keitum, Wolgast. 
Schleswig. — 18th. Danzig. — 21st. Athens. 
-^25th. Peckeloh; Posen. 

— Nov. 3. Lichtenberg. — 10th. Altenburg. 

— Dec. 7. Munster ; Peckeloh. — 11th. Hermannstadt. — 

25th. Grullenberg (Saxony) ; Peckeloh. — 
30th. Peckeloh. 

1870. Jan. 1. Culloden ; Gratz, Meseritz, Beitzenhain. — 2nd. 

Culloden. — 3rd. Volpeglino, Piedmont ; 
Nantes, and other parts of France ; Guern- 
sey ; Worthing, Eoyston, Somerleyton, 
Norwich, Boston, Eccles, Cxilloden ; Brus- 


sels. — 4th. Wisbecli.— 6th. Munster ; 
Papenburg. — 8th. Oxford, Liverpool, Cock- 
ermouth, North Shields. — 10th. Eastbourne. 
—20th. Munster, Peckeloh.— 23rd, 26th. 
Culloden. — 28th. Liverpool, Carlisle, Cul- 
loden. — 29th. Liverpool, Carlisle, Culloden, 
Allenheads — 30th. Weybridge, Hawsker; 
Brussels; Munster; Lennep; Peokeloh. — 
31st. Lennep ; Peckeloh. 
1870. Feb. 1. Paris, Calais ; London, Diss, Eastbourne, 
Wisbech, Boston, Eoyston, Little Wratting, 
Norwich, Somerleyton, North Shields, 
Culloden; Brussels, Kain near Tournay, 
Euhrort, Munster ; Munich ; Lennep ; 
Peckeloh ; Dresden, Grceditz ; Grullenberg ; 
Liohtenberg ; KcesHn, Kcenigsberg ; Cracow. 
—2nd. Culloden, Weybridge.— 3rd, 4th. 
Culloden. — 11th. York, Hawsker, North 
Shields, Taunton, Wilton, Streatly, Little 
Wratting, Cardington. — 12th. Helston, 
Coekermouth. — 17th. Leipzig. — 19th. 
Truro. — 21st. Hawarden. — 23rd. Culloden. 
— 27th. PecLe'oh. — 28th. Weybridge, 
Hawarden, Culloden. 

— Mar. 1. Hawarden. — Brd. Cardington, Boston. — 13th. 

Oxford, Taunton, Boston, Hawsker. — 14th. 
Guernsey. — 22nd. Stonyhurst, York, Little 
Wratting. — 24th. York. — 25th. Weybridge. 
—28th. Lichtenberg. — 30th. Oxford, 
Valentia ; Westphalia. 

— April 5. Athens ; Fiume ; Piacenza, Volpeglino, North 

de Italy ; Macon, Anglers, le Mans, Nantes, 
Brest, Paris, all the north, of France; 
London; Brussels, Louvain, Kain, Gram- 
mont ; Flushing, Utrecht, Leeuwarden ; 
Splugen, Groechen, Vuadens, all north-east- 
ern Switzerland; Mayence, Sinzig, Bonn, 
Westphalia ; aU North Germany ; Buda, 
Isohl, Feldkirk ; Munich, Deutsch Krone ; all 
Saxony ; Karnik near Posen. — 18th. Green- 
wich ; Peckeloh, Lennep ; Stettin. — 23rd. 
Papenburg.- — 25th. Eeitzenhain. 

— May 19. Greenwich. — 20th. Paris ; London ; Mannheim ; 

Munster ; Zurich ; Hermannstadt, Oravitza, 
Fiume, Tisza Fured, Debreczin, Edel^ny, 
Bechnitz, Gospic. 


1870. June 1. Louvain. 

— Aug. 1. Peokeloh.— 3rd. Amsterdam.— 19th. Munster; 

Carthaus near Dulmen. — 20th. Groninguen ; 
Munster, Peckeloh; Leipzig.— 21st. Vol- 

— Sept. 2. Athens. — 3rd. Greenwich; Hamburg; Doebehi; 

Niederorsohel. — Ith. Workum, Zuidbroek; 
Niederorschel ; Norburgoff Alsen; Schleswig. 
^18th. Hamburg. — 21st. Hamburg, Nor- 
"" burg, Schleswig ; Lichtenberg. — 22nd, 23rd. 
Peckeloh.— 24th. Moncalieri and all Pied- 
mont ; Vendome ; London, Hawkhurst ; 
Brussels, Louvain, Stavelot; Groninguen; 
Mayenoe ; Zurich ; Vienna, Kremsmunster ; 
Prague, Eger; Buda,Edeleny, Obernberg sur 
Inn, Enzersdorf im Thale ; Niederorschel, 
Carthaus near Dulmen, Weisenheim am Bry ; 
Munster ; Peckeloh, WoUgast ; Alsen, Nor- 
burg off Alsen, Schleswig ; Berlin, Danzig. — 
25th. Greenwich ; Ostend, Kain ; Ouddorf, 
Welna,Boekhorst, Terborgh and all Zealand ; 
Zurich ; Munster ; Hamburg ; Weisenheim 
am Bry, Carthaus near Dulmen ; Peckeloh, 
Schleswig ; Eehfeld ; Danzig. — 26th. Green- 
wich ; Guddorp, Welna, Boekhorst, Terborgh 
and all Zealand, Hamburg, Keitum ; Weisen- 
hein am Bry ; Peckeloh ; Lichtenberg. — 
27th. Hamburg ; Schleswig ; Peckeloh. — 
20th. Lichtenberg. 

— Got. 1. England ; Westphalia. — 2nd, 3rd. England. — 

14th. Vend6me ; Greenwich, England ; 
Holland ; Schcenenberg (canton of Zurich) ; 
Edeleny ; Groeditz Bautzen ; Munster ; 
Putbus, Hamburg ; Lichtenberg ; Cracow. — 
15th. Holland.— 17th, 18th. England.— 
20th. Vendome ; England ; Aarau, Brugg, 
Muri ; WestphaUa ; Kiesa. — 21st. England ; 
Norburg off Alsen. — 22nd. England ; 
Cologne ; Hinterhermsdorf ; Cracow. — 23rd. 
Fiume. — 24th. Bagdad ; Athens ; Constan- 
tinople, Lala Tchiflik, to the south of Andri- 
nople ; Roustchouck, Orsova ; Lisbon, Oporto, 
Madrid ; Palermo, Catania, Otranto, Eome, 
Florence, Fiesole, Perugia, Leghorn, Milan ; 
Trieste, Lissa, Lesina, Fiume ; Saint-Petei 
near Goerz, Modena, Varallo, Moncalieri. 


Alexandria ; Paris, Tours, Metz, the whole 
of France ; London, Greenwich, Torquay, 
Scarborough, Penzance, Valentia, the whole 
of England; Brussels, Louvain, Kain, 
Ostend, &c. ; aU Holland ; Bellinzona, 
Lugano, Monte Generoso, Brusio, Splugen, 
Coire, Einsiedeln, Berne, Altorf, Geneva, 
all northern Switzerland ; Vienna, Krems- 
munster ; Hermannstadt, Ssechsisch-Eegen ; 
Karlsburg ; Leipzig, Saxony ; Mnnster, 
Hamburg-; Niederorschel, Carthaus, Pecke- 
loh ; Berlin, Stettin, Breslau, Danzig and 
North Germany. — 25th. Corfu ; Athens, 
Greece ; Constantinople, Turkey in Europe, 
Orsova, Eustchuck, Sarajevo, Prevesa; 
Lisbon, Oporto, Madrid; Cataro, Castelnu- 
ova, Lesina, Lissa, Eiume, Trieste, Palermo, 
Catania, Otranto, Naples, Eome, Fiesole, 
Florence, Modena, MUan, Genoa, Turin, 
Moncalieri; Paris, Tours, Metz and all 
France ; London, Scarborough ; Brussels, 
Louvain, Kain, Ostend ; Vienna, Krems- 
munster, OberhoUabrmm, Presburg, Buda, 
GyaUa ; Munster, Niederorschel, Keitum, 
Hamburg ; Leipzig, Saxony ; Schleswig, 
Peckeloh, Berlin, Breslau and all Germany. 
— 26th. Athens.— 27th. Athens ; Monte 
Generoso ; England ; Hamburg. • — 28th. 
Athens ; England ; Hamburg.^29th. Ham- 
burg ; Lichtenberg. — 30th. England. 

1870. Nov. 1. England ; Hamburg. — 8th. Leeuwarden ; 

Schleswig; Leipzig, Saxony. — 14th, 17th, 
• 18th. England ; Saxony. — 19th. England ; 
Brussels, Louvain, Verviers ; Zurich, Coire ; 
Munster ; Schleswig ; Eger ; Leipzig, many 
parts of Saxony ; Niederorschel ; Peckeloh. 
—21st. England.— 22nd. Mediasch (Tran- 
sylvania) ; England. — 25th. England. — 27th, 
— Dec. 15. England. — 16th. England, Westphalia; Kei- 
tum; Schleswig; Peckeloh.— 17th. Ven. 
d6me ; England ; Brussels. Louvain, 
GroBohen; Munster; Keitum; Schleswig; 
Zittau; Peckeloh, Putbus ; Breslau. — 22nd. 
Schleswig. — 26th. Peckeloh. 

1871. Jan. 12. Louvain. — 13th. London ; Louvain ; Cologne, 


Munster ; Peckeloh, Schleswig ; Tharandt ; 
Breslau. — 14th. Louvain. — 15th. Schleswig ; 
Breslau. — 16th. Louvain. 
1871. Feb. 5. Breslau.— 9th. Cleves; Putbus.— 11th. Eng- 
land ; Cleves, Emden, Westphalia, Keitum ; 
Peckeloh ; WoUgast ; Putbus. — 12th. Eome, 
Frascati, Florence, Modena, Volpeglino, 
Moncalieri ; Greenwich, West Coasts of 
England, Louvain ; Mayenoe, Cleves ; Altorf, 
Coire, Bagatz ; Vienna, Eger ; Daschitz 
(Moravia) ; Saxony ; Munster ; Niederor- 
schel ; Peckeloh ; Weserleuchtthurm ; WoU- 
gast ; Breslau, Putbus, Kceshn, Stettin. — 
13th. England.— 14th. Volpeglino.— 15th. 
Eome ; Zurich. 

— Mar. 12. London. — 13th. GruUenberg (Saxony). — 14th. 

Bautzen, Dresden, Wermsdorf ; Grceditz, 
Zittau, Plauen, Koenigstein. — 16th. Eoohe's 
Point ; Munster ; Peckeloh.— 17th. Pied- 
mont. — 18th. Zurich; Goerisch; Goerlitz, 
Oberwiesenthal. — 21st. Munster. — 22nd. 
Leeuvsrardeu. — 23rd. Venice, Leeuwarden, 
Emden ; Cleves ; Munster ; WoUgast ; 
Peckeloh.— 29th. Emden. 

— April 1. London ; Brussels ; Cleves ; Treves ; Breslau. 

— 2nd. Stettin. — 8th. Turin, Moncalieri ; 
Breslau. — 9th. Palermo, Perugia, Piacenza, 
Padua, Milan, Trente, Tortona, Volpeglino, 
Alexandria, MonoaUeri, Turin, Genoa ; 
Anglers ; England ; Brussels, Louvain ; 
Zurich, Glarus, Sargans ; Vienna, Prague ; 
Mayence, Frankfort ; Keitum, Weserleucht- 
thurm ; Bautzen ; Stettin, and many parts 
of Germany. — 10th. Moncalieri, Alexandria, 
Padua, &c., London; Peckeloh. — 11th. 
Aosta ; Westphalia ; Peckeloh. — 13th. 
Palermo, England. — 14th. Leipzig, Dresden, 
Wermsdorf, Groeditz, Zittau, Koenigstein,' 
Plauen, and other parts of Saxony, Peckeloh, 
Stettin. — 15th. Palermo, Piacenza; Pecke- 
loh ; Stettin. — 16th. London ; Stettin. — 
17th. Volpeglino ; Stettin. — 18th. Palermo, 
Perugia, Urbino, Florence, Lodi, Alexandria, 
MoncaUeri, Volpeglino, Bra, Piedmont, 
Lombardy ; Zurich, Aarau, Coire, Saint-Gall, 
Winterthur ; CiUi ; Oberwiesenthal, Groeditz, 


Leipzig ; Breslau ; Putbus, Koeslin, Stettin, 
WoUgast, Plensburg.— 19th. Lohn.— 21st. 
Ulm.— 22nd. Paris.— 23rd. Palermo, Lodi, 
Turin, Moncalieri, Alexandria, Bra, Genoa, 
Volpeglino ; Munster. 

1871. May 8. London, England.— 16tli. England.— 17th. 

England; Peckeloh.— 18th. Berne.— 19th, 
20th, 22nd, 26th. England. 

— June 7, 12. Athens ; MonoaUeri. — 13th. Cleves. — 14th. 

Cleves ; Peckeloh.— 16th. Turin.— 18th. 
Athens; Moncalieri. — 27th, Moncalieri; 

— July 14. Moncaheri. — 25th. Eoche's Point. 

— Aug. 10. Peckeloh.— 11th. Valentia.— 16th. England. 

— 21st. London, Ireland. — 28rd. Zurich ; 
Emden. — 24th. Aberdeen, Eoche's Point ; 

— Sept. 4. Ireland. — 7th. Houlgate (Calvados) ; WoUgast. 

—16th. Eoche's Point.— 19th. Emden. 

— Oct. 6. Emden. — 10th. Zurich, Aarau; Mayence. — 

11th. WoUgast.— 13th. London; Peckeloh. 
— 15th. Peckeloh. — 16th. London. 

— Nov. 2. Volpeglino, Moncalieri, Aosta; Groninguen, 

Emden ; Bonn ; Gyalla (Hungary) ; Eger ; 
Opladen, Husum, Kiel ; Bergen on Eugen, 
Woolgast, Danzig. — 3rd. Paris ; GyaUa. — • 
4th. Peckeloh. — 5th. GyaUa.— 7th. Pec- 
keloh. — 9th. Modena, Genoa, Turin, Mon- 
calieri, Volpeglino ; Anglers, Paris, Brest ; 
Greenwich, England ; Entremonts near 
Binche (Belgium); Emden; Bonn; Genoa; 
Woolgast, Opladen, Peckeloh ; Kiel; Dingel- 
stedt ; Leipzig. — 10th. Genoa, Lodi, Mon- 
dovi, Turin, Moncalieri, Volpeglino, Aosta ; 
Paris ; Greenwich, SeUly ; Entremonts ; 
Bonn ; Eger ; Woolgast, Opladen, Eoessel, 
Dingelstedt ; Danzig. — 14th. Genoa ; Alex- 
andria. — 15th. Genoa. — 17th. Danzig. — 
18th. Emden.— 20th. Aosta, Danzig.— 24th. 

— Deo. 6. Peckeloh. — 10th. Emden.— 14th. Peckeloh.— 

18th. London. — 31st. Eoche's Point. 

1872. Jan. 3. London. — 5th. Modena. — 6th. Palermo. — 7th. 

Florence, Modena, Genoa, Aosta. — 9th. 
Florence. — 15th. Aosta. — 18th. Emden. — 
21st. Florence. — 27th. Peckeloh. — 30th. 


Volpeglino ; London. — 31st. Greenwich ; 
1872. Feb. 1. Florence. — 2nd. Modena; Weybridge.— 3rd. 
Algiers; Brighton, Sidmouth. — 4th. Bom- 
bay ; Lahore ; Suez, Syena, Cairo, Alex- 
andria ; Athens ; Constantinople ; Malta ; 
Palermo, Otranto, Bome, Florence, Genoa, 
Moncalieri, Aosta, &o., in general all Italy ; 
Mostar, Lesina, Pola, Trieste ; Lisbon ; 
Madrid, Barcelona ; Marseilles ; MontpelUer, 
Toulouse, Bordeaux, Lyons, Macon, Poitiers, 
Tours, Brest, Paris, Nancy, &c., Greenwich, 
SciUy, Stonyhurst, Dublin, whole of England ; 
Louvain, Cleves, Cologne, Aix-la-ChapeUe, 
Bonn ; Geneva, Zurich and aU Switzerland ; 
Kremsmimster, Czernowitz, Salzbourg, Her- 
mannstadt, Lemberg, Cracow, Prague ; 
Saxony ; Munster ; Peckeloh ; Bossel, 
WoUgast ; Breslau ; Danzig; Nakskow ; 
Bandholm on Laaland, - &c. : all Europe 
from Turkey and Sicily to Scotland. — 
5th. Eome, Moncalieri; Brighton ; Zurich ; 
Freiberg. — 6th. Moncaheri ; Brighton ; 
Hinterhermsdorf. — 8th. Genoa, Aosta ; 
Zurich ; Lichtenberg. — 9th. Genoa. — 10th. 
Volpeglino. — 11th. Brighton. — 17th. Mon- 
caheri ; Constance. — 22nd. Emden. — 23rd. 
Culloden. — 26th. Mondovi, Moncalieri ; 
Emden.— 27th. Genoa, Alexandria, Volpe- 

— Mar. 1. Florence. — 2nd. Paris. — 4th. Moncalieri ; 

Emden. — 5th. Moncalieri, Aosta ; Emden. 
■ — 6th. Messina, Palermo, Modena; London; 
Emden ; Peckeloh. — 7th. Genoa, Mon- 
caheri ; London. — 8th. Moncalieri, Modena ; 
London ; Lichtenberg. — 9th. Moncaheri. — 
10th. Modena ; Emden ; Lichtenberg. — 
11th. Modena; Lichtenberg, Stettin. — 12th. 
Moncaheri, Genoa ; Emden ; Lichtenberg. 
— 14th. Emden. — 16th. Alexandria. — 19th. 
Halifax. — 20th. Moncalieri ; Norwich ; 
Emden. — 27th, 29th. Genoa, Mondovi. — 
30th. Mondovi ; London ; Lichtenberg. — 
31st. Cantalupo: Emden. 

— April 1. Alexandria, Volpeglino; Emden. — 2nd. Alex- 

andria. — 3rd. Moncalieri ; Stonyhurst ; 


Emden. — 6th. Genoa, Moncalieri. — 7th. 
Mondovi. — 8th. Lyons. — 10th. Milan, 
Mondovi, Moncalieri, VolpegUno ; Paris, 
Brest; Stonyhurst. — 11th. Genoa, Volpe- 
glino ; Greenwich ; Emden, Peckeloh. — 
12th. Piacenza. — 13th. Piacenza; Emden. 
— 14th. Mondovi, Aosta ; Emden. — 15th. 
Moncalieri, Mondovi, Aosta ; department of 
the Yonne, Sevres ', Greenwich, Stonyhurst. 
—17th, 22nd, 24th, 29th, 30th. Emden. 
There were in this month nine days of 
aurora in England, dates and places of 
observation not indicated. 
1872. May 2. Westphalia. — 7th. Peckeloh, Westphalia.— 
9th. Florence, Venice, Milan, Mondovi, 
Moncalieri, Aosta ; Asgiers ; Verdingen 
(near Cologne). — 10th. Turin.— 15th. Aosta. 
— 17th. Volpeglino. There were in this month 
sIk days of auroras in England, dates and 
places not given. 

— June 4, 5. Paris. — 6th. Sevres. — 7th. Emden.— 10th. 

Anglers. — 12th. Emden. — ^21st. Vienna, 
Cracow. — 23rd. Nancy. — 30th. Emden. — 
There were in this month three days of 
auroras in England, dates and places not 

— July 1, 2. Brighton. — 5th. Sfevres. — 6th. Genoa, 

VeUetri ; Sevres. — 7th. P^aris, Brest ; Ports- 
mouth, BridportjLeenane (Ireland) ; Anvers; 
Mayence ; Zurich ; Cracow ; Dingelstadt, 
Kiel. — 8th. Madrid ; Greenwich, Oxford. — • 
19th. Anglers; Greenwich.— 26th, 28th. 
Lichtenberg. — 30th. Brighton. — 31st. An- 

— Aug. 1. Brighton ; Lichtenberg. — 2nd. North Shields. 

• — 3rd. Aosta ; Guernsey ; SOloth ; Zurich ; 
Cracow ; Stettin. — 4th. s CuUoden ; Emden ; 
Laibaoh, Cracow. — 5th. Anglers. — 6th. 
Brighton; Zurich; Tiszafured (Hungary). 
— 8th. Modena, MoncaUeri, Volpeglino; 
Anglers ; Guernsey ; Helston, Taunton, Ox- 
ford, Hawarden, Llandudno, CuUoden, 
SUloth ; Lichtenberg. — 9th. Geneva, Turin, 
Moncalieri ; Volpeglino ; Beltort ; York ; 
Llandudo ; Emden ; Lichtenberg. — 10th. 
Allenheads; Prague. — 13th. CuUoden. — 


14th. Brighton, Oxford, Llandudno, Cullo- 
den, Stonyhurst ; Cleves, Mayenoe, Darm- 
stadt ; Bremen, Peokeloh ; Oraoow ; Leipzig ; 
Stettin, KcBslin.— 15th. Eome (?).— 25th. 
Lisbon (?) ; Westphalia ; Wermsdorf 
(Saxony). — 26th. 86vres. — 27th. Sevres ; 
Liohtenberg. — 28th. Florence, Genoa, 
Monoalieri, Volpeglino, Aosta ; York. — 29th. 
1S72. Sept. 2. Paris, Sevres ; Brighton, Cockermouth ; West- 
phalia; Berlin. — 3rd. Eome; Paris; Sfevres; 
Hawarden ; Llandudno ; Koeslin. — 4th. 
Paris, Sevres ; London, Brighton. — 5th. 
Paris, Sevres ; Brighton, York.— 6th. York. 
—8th. Eccles. — 9th. Hawarden, Stony- 
hurst, York, Oockermouth, Silloth. — 11th. 
Sevres. — 14th. Emden. — 17th. Oxford, 
Silloth.— 21st. Silloth.— 27th. Sevres.— 
28th. Paris, Sevres.— 29th. Volpeglino; 
York, Carlisle, North Shields. 

— Oct. 1. Paris. — 2nd. London, Valencia*^ — 3rd. Silloth, 

North Shields. — 5th. Emden. — 6th. Sevres; 
London ; Brighton ; Emden ; Peckeloh. — ■ 
7th. Modena ; Aosta ; Paris ; Brighton ; 
Peckeloh.— 8th. Paris, Sfevres.- 9th. Mo- 
dena.— 10th. Paris.— 11th, 12th. Emden. 
—13th. Peckeloh.— 14th. Sfevres; Brest; 
Guernsey ; Peckeloh. — 15th. MoncaHeri, 
Aosta ; Sfevres ; Peckeloh. — 16th. Sfevres. 
— 17th. Sevres ; Oxford, Carlisle ; Peckeloh. 
—18th, 19th. Peckeloh.— 22nd. Sevres; 
Emden. — 23rd. Emden ; Lichtenberg. — 
24th, 25th. Lichtenberg.— 26th. Paris; 
Emden ; Peckeloh ; Lichtenberg. — 27th. 
Paris, Emden. — 28th. Oxford. — 30th. 
Paris. — 31st. Brighton. 

— Nov. 1. Paris ; Lichtenberg. — 2nd. Brighton ; Liohten- 

berg. — 4th. Lichtenberg. — 5th. Emden. — 
6th. London, Shields, Wick.— 9th. Wick.— 
11th. Carlisle, Cockermouth, Stonyhurst. 
—15th. Helston. — 19th. Paris ; Em- 
den ; Peckeloh. — 20th. Paris ; Cambridge ; 
Peckeloh.— 21st. Wick.— 24th. Liohten- 
berg. — 25th. Moncalieri ; VolpegHno ; Paris ; 
Lichtenberg. • — 27th. Palermo, Messina, 
Perugia, Monoalieri ; Gbttingen ; Liohten- 


berg.— 28tli. Paris; Emden.— 29th. Dan- 

1872. Dee. 1. Oxford; Peckeloh.— 2nd. Cooliermouth.— 3rd. 

Milan, Piaoenza, Turin, Moncalieri, Ivrea, 
Aosta; Liohtenberg. — 4th. Trebizond.— 5th. 
Trebizond ; Lemberg. — 6th. Lemberg ; 
Peckeloh. — 9th. Greenwich, Oxford, Stony- 
hurst.— 11th. Perugia.— 14th. Moneaheri, 
Volpeglino, Aosta. — 22nd. Munster.— 23rd. 
Volpeglino, Aosta ; Peckeloh. — 24th. Gottin- 
gen, Peckeloh; Dallund. — 25th. Gottingen. 
— 26th. Stonyhurst; Peckeloh; Lichtenberg. 
—27th. Peckeloh, Dallund.— 28th. Chiari, 
Turin, Moncalieri. — 29th. Munster. 

1873. Jan. 1. Greenwich. — 3rd. Brighton, Liverpool. — 5th. 

ISforth Shields. — 6th. Aosta. — 7th. Paris; 
Adriatic, lat 44° 40' N. long. 11° 35' E. ; 
Brighton, Eastbourne, Portsmouth, Green- 
wich, Lymington, "Weybridge, Oxford, 
Eoyston, Stonyhurst. — 10th. Carhsle. — 
16th. Streatley.— 19th. Weybridge.— 20th. 
Volpeglino. — 23rd. Aosta. — 25th. WoUgast. 
—27th, 30th. Perugia. 

— Feb. 19. Aosta.— 20th, Stonyhurst.— 22nd. Volpeglino, 

Aosta ; Carlisle, Cockermouth, — 23rd. Volpe- 
glino ; Weybridge. — 27th. Perugia, Mon- 
calieri; Carlisle, Bywell. — 28th. Moncalieri 

— Mar. 10. Greenwich. — 20th. Brighton. — 21st. Volpe- 

glino. — 22nd. Volpeglino, Ao ta ; Oxford 
Wisbech. — 23rd. Perugia, Leghorn, Volpe- 
glino, Aosta. — 24th. Aosta. 

— April 1. Portsmouth, Brighton, Oxford, Wisbech, 

Stonyhurst. — 2nd. Guernsey ; Oxford. — 
18th. Ecoles, Halifax, HuU, York, Stony- 
hurst, Carhsle, Cockermouth, SiUoth. — 19th. 
Oxford, Hahfax, Hull, Stonyhurst. — 20th. 
Oxford, Stonyhurst. — 21st. Norwich. — 22nd. 
Stonyhurst.— 24th, 28th. Brighton.— 30th. 
Guernsey ; Brighton. 

— May 14. Genoa, Aosta. — 15th. Genoa, Aosta; Brighton. 

• — 23rd. Moncalieri, Aosta. — 24th. Aosta. 

— June 25. Stonyhurst. — 26th. Perugia, Alexandria, Mon- 

calieri, Bra, Volpeglino, Aosta. — 27th. 
Perugia, Moncalieri, Bra, Volpeglino, Aosta. 

— July 16. Brighton. 

— Aug. 6. Oxford.— 13th. Perugia, Umbria.— 15th. Birr 


Castle (Ireland). — 18th. Stonyhurst. — 21st, 
22iid, 23rd, 31st. Birr Castle. 

1873. Sept. 15. Birr Castle.— 20th. Carlisle, Birr Castle.— 

21st, 29th. Birr Castle. 

— Oct. 11. Birr Castle.— 12th. Silloth, Birr Castle.— 13th. 

Hidl.- 15th. Halifax. — 18th, 30th. Birr 

— Nov. 2. Birr Castle.— 12th, 13th. Hull. 

— Deo. 9. Birr Castle. — 17th. Piacenza, Turin, Mon- 

caheri, Volpeglino. — 19th. CarUsle. — 26th. 
Birr Castle. 

1874. Jan. 6. Cockermouth. — 12th. Birr Castle. — 16th. 

Weybridge Heath, Silloth, Birr Castle. — 
17th. Stonyhurst, Carlisle. — I8th. CarUsle. 
—24th. Helston. 

— Feb. 4. Perugia, Florence, Leghorn, Udina, Ivrea. 

Mondovi; Toulouse; Portsmouth, Green- 
wich, Taunton, Weybridge Heath, Salisbury, 
Streatley, Leicester, Oxford, Wisbech, Eccles, 
I5ywell, Whitehaven, Cambridge, Sunder- 
land, Stonyhurst, Cockermouth, Allenhead, 
Silloth, Birr Castle ; Vienna, Prague ; WoU- 
gast. — 5th. Silloth, Birr Castle. — 8th. 
Modena.— 16th. Weybridge Heath.— 17th. 
SiUoth.— 18th, 19th. Modena. 

— Mar. 7. Pare Saint-Maur near Paris (?) ; ByweU, 

North Shields, SiUoth, Birr Castle.— 9th, 
18th. Birr Castle. 

— AprU 7, 9, 14. Birr Castle. 

— May 3. Birr Castle. 

— June 3. Oxford, Liverpool. — 13th. Guernsey. 

— July 2. HaUfax. — 22nd. Streatley. 

— Aug. 31. SUloth. 

— Oct. 3. England. — 4th. Greenwich, England. — 13th, 

14th, 18th. England. — 22nd. MoncaUeri, 
Pignerol, Volpeglino. — 29th. Pare Saint- 

— Dec. 7. Ivrea, Volpeglino. 

1875. Feb. 23. Nedanocz (Hungary). 

— Mar. 4. Cardington. 

— AprU 26. Brighton.— 30th. Streatley. 

— June 2. Volpeglino. 

— July 14. Stonyhurst.— 24th. SUloth.— 29th. Cardmgton. 

— Sept. 20. SaUsbury. 

— Oct. 2. Weybridge Heath, SUloth. 

— Nov. 5, 6. Cardington. — 11th; Volpeglino. 



1875. Dec. 8. North Shields.— lath. Volpeglino.— 21st. Wey- 

bridge Heath. 

1876. Feb. 19. Liverpool, Whitehaven, Caloethorpe, Stony- 

hurst, North Shields. 

— Mar. 13. Perugia, Arena. — 21st. Perugia. 

— April Pour days of auroras in England, dates not 


— June Two days of auroras in England, dates not 


— Dee. 5. Weybridge. 

1877. Jan. 23. Guernsey. 

— Nov. 10, 28. Torquay. 

1878. Mar. 25. Carlisle. 
— ■ April 3. Torquay. 

— June 1. Brussels. — 8rd. Breslau. 

1879. No aurora in Europe this year below lat. 55°. 

1880. Mar. 17. Grypskerk. 

— April 8, 14. North Shields. 

— Aug. 10. Shap (Westmoreland). — 11th. Stonyhurst. — 

12th. Brighton, Strathfield, Oxford, Leicester, 
Bolton, Whitby, Stonyhurst, Carlisle, Silloth, 
North Shields.— 13th. Torquay. 

— Nov. 3. Greenwich, Lowestoft, Cambridge, Liverpool, 

Cirencester, Bootham, Downport, Dublin ; 
Wilhemsbafei.- 27th. Bradford. 

1881. Jan. 31. Parma, Alexand_-ia, Moncalieri, Volpeglino; 

all England; Brussels, Maldeghem, Mes- 
sines, Louvain, Croix ; Utrecht J WUhelms- 
hafen, Buxtehude (near Hamburg), aU the 
north-east of Germany ; Hohenpeissen- 
berg, Lomtrach, Memmingen, Meersburg, 

— Feb. 1. Atlantic, lat. 48° N.-16° W.— 27th. Atlantic, 

lat. 49° N.-25° W.— Several auroras in 
England from the 7th to the 10th, exact 
dates and places unknown. 

— Mar. 19, 20. SiUoth. 

— April 20. Cambridge, Llandudno, Stonyhurst ; Atlantic, 

lat. 41° N.-67° W. 

— Sept. 12. Atlantic, lat. 50° N.-32° W. and lat. 43° N.- 

52° W. — 13th. Alexandria ; England ; Atlan- 
tic, lat. 42° N.-37° W.— 14th. Atlantic, lat. 
45° N.-46° W. 

— Oct. 16. Atlantic, lat. 42° N.-65° W., 44° N.-56° W., and 

47° N.-52° W.— 21st, 22nd. Carlisle. 

— Nov. 23. Cardington. 


1881. Deo. 23. Atlantic, lat. 50° N. in the whole space between 

20° and 40° W. long. 

1882. Jan. 19. Atlantic, lat. 41° N.-72° W. and 48° N.-34° W. 

— Feb. 6. Atlantic, lat. 43° N.-51° W.— 15th. Atlantic, 

lat. 35° N.-15° W.— 16th, 17th. Bermerside. 
— 20th. Bedford, Bermerside. 

— Mar. 19. Atlantic, lat 41° N.-59° W.— 21st. Stonyhurst, 

— -April 13, 14, 15. Middle of the Atlantic between 41° and 

48° N. and 25° and 70° W.— 16th. Hanover; 
middle of the Atlantic— 18th, 19th, 20th, 
21st. Middle of the Atlantic. 

— May 11. Atlantic, lat. 41° N.-62° W. — 14th. M^ru 

Ternat (Haute-Marne), Pornic ; Worcester, 
Oldham, Dublin; Atlantic, lat. 41° N.-27°W. 
and 47° N.-17° W. — 29th. Atlantic, lat. 
41° N.-66° W. 

— July 16. Atlantic, from 40° to 42° N. and from 64° to 

67° W. 

— Aug. 4. Atlantic, from 37° to 47° N. and from 38° to 

75° W.— 5th. Stonyhurst.— 9th. Atlantic, 
lat. 42° N.-65° W.— 11th. Atlantic, lat. 40° 
N.-65°W. and lat. 43° N.-49° W. — 14th. 
Atlantic, lat. 41° N.-61° W.— 22nd. Atlantic, 
lat. 41° N.-57° W.— 23rd. Stonyhurst.— 30th. 

— Sept. 4. Atlantic, lat. 43° N.-60° W.— 5th. Atlantic, lat. 

45° N.-48° W.— nth. Atlantic, lat. 41° N.- 
62° W.— 12th. Atlantic, lat. 42° N.-54° W. 
and lat. 49° N.-12° W.— 20th. Atlantic, lat. 
58° N.-18° W. 

— Oct. 1 Halifax. — 2nd. Mondragona, Florence, Mon- 

calieri ; Paris, pare Saint-Maur, Saint-Leu, 
Taverny, Evreux, La Teste, Nantes, Dinard, 
Cherbourg, LandeUes, Seez, Laon, Amiens, 
LiUe ; Guernsey ; Torquay, Greenwich, Ox- 
ford, Leicester, Hull, Scarborough, Chelten- 
ham, Newcastle-on-Tyne, Dublin, &c. ; 
Brussels, Louvain, Utrecht ; Basle, Trogen ; 
Braganza ; Pola, Budapest, Breslau, Griin- 
berg, Swinemunde ; all the Atlantic. — 
3rd. Oxford, Hull.— 4th. All the Atlantic— 
5th. Stonyhurst, Silloth; Atlantic. — 8th, 
15th, 16th, 17th. Atlantic— 18th. Croydon. 
—22nd, 24th, 28th, 29th. Atlantic— 30th. 

— Nov. 1. Oxford.— 11th. Atlantic— 12th. Stonyhurst, 


York, Sillotli; Atlantic. — 13fch. Stonyhnrst, 
Bolton, York ; Atlantic. — 14th. Stonyhnrst, 
York; Atlantic— 15th, 16th. York.— 17th. 
Eome, Florence, Moncalieri, Volpeglino ; 
Nice, Marseilles, Grenoble, Valencia, Mont- 
pellier, Paris, Laon, Cherbourg, Saint-Brieuc, 
Ploermel, Douai, &c. ; Guernsey ; Torquay, 
Greenwich, Osborne, Oxford, Hull, Halifax, 
Stonyhurst, York, Silloth, &c. ; Brussels, 
Bruges, Tournai, Antwerp, all Belgium; 
Utrecht, Zieriksee, all Holland ; all Switzer- 
land; Kume, Pola, Lussinpiccolo, Agram, 
Boveredo, ■ Boehm, Aicha ; Atlantic. — 18th. 
Torquay, Cardington ; Atlantic. — 19th, 20th. 
Oxford; Atlantic. — 25th. Atlantic. 

1882. Dec. 12. Atlantic— 15th. Atlantic, between 30° and 

59° W.— 19th. Oxford, York.— 23rd. Hahfax. 

1883. Jan. 24. Geestemunde. 

— Feb. 1. All the Atlantic— 2nd. West of the Atlantic. 

—12th. HuU.— 15th. Brixham (?).— 24tb. 

— Mar. 3. Oxford.— 4th, 8th. Atlantic— 10th. Oxford.— 

28th. Atlantic. 

— April 2. Whitchurch. — ^Srd, 24th. Stonyhurst ; Atlantic. 

— May 11, 14. Stonyhurst.— 26th. Whitchurch. 

— June 30. Atlantic. 

— July 1, 6, 29, 30. Atlantic. 

— Aug. 6. Whitchurch. — 7th, 22nd. Atlantic. — 30th. 


— Sept. 4. Atlantic— 5th. Silloth; Atlantic. — 7th. At- 

lantic— 8th. Stonyhurst.— 11th, 12th, 15th, 
16th, 23rd, 24th, 25th. Atlantic 

— Oct. 4. Stonyhurst; Atlantic. — 5th. Cambridge, Stony- 

hurst, Carlisle, SiUoth ; Atlantic. — 16th, 
31st. Atlantic. 

— Nov. 1. Atlantic from 30° to 75° W.— 2nd. Atlantic, 

from 13° to 55° W.— 5th. Atlantic, lat. 
46° N.-49° W.— 8th. Beaehy Head.— 16th. 
Atlantic, lat. 37° N.-76° W.— 21st. Atlantic, 
from 43° to 75° W. — 22nd. Llandudno, 
SiUoth ; Atlantic, from 58° to 68° W.— 28th. 
Blackheath.— 30th. Atlantic, from 31° to 
39° W., and in the south as far as lat. 39° N. 

— Dec 1. Torquay. — 2nd. Torquay, Whitchurch. 

1884. Jan. 17. Carlisle.— 18th. Atlantic, lat. 46° N.-46° W.— 

19th. Carlisle. 


1884. Feb. 24. Stonyliurst- 

— Mar. 21. Stonyhurst. 

— April 2. Stonyhurst.— 14th. Atlantic, from 42° to 67° W. 

—17th. Atlantic, from 41° N.-65° W.— 24th. 
Oxford, Cambridge, Halifax, Stonyhurst ; 
Atlantic, lat. 46° N.-39° W., and lat. 48° N.- 
34° W.— 30th. Atlantic, lat. 41° N.-70° W. 

— June 18. Atlantic, lat. 45° N.-44° W.— 22nd. Atlantic, 

lat. 41° N.-66° W., and lat. 41° N.-71° W. 

— Aug. 20. Atlantic, lat. 60° N.-22°W. — 31st. Atlantic, 

lat. 44° N.-59° W. 

— Sept. 13. Atlantic,lat.49°N.-29°"W.— 14th. Atlantic, lat. 

41° N.-67° W.— 17th, 18th. Stonyhurst. 

— Oct. 1. North Sea ; Atlantic, lat. 45° N.-55° W.— 3rd, 

4th. Stonyhurst.— 6th. Atlantic, lat. 46° N.- 
50° W.— 15th. Atlantic, lat. 47° N.-42° W. 
— 16th. Stonyhurst. 

— Nov. 2. Atlantic, lat. 48° N.-36° W. 

— Dec. 14. Atlantic, lat. 41° N.-67° W. 
1835. Jan. 22. Atlantic, lat. 50° N.-27° W. 

— Feb. 5. Stonyhurst; Atlantic, lat. 49° N.-37° W.—Hth. 

Atlantic, lat. 44° N.-59° W. 

— Mar. 6, 14. Stonyhurst. — 15th. Torquay, Brighton, 

Greenwich, Leicester, Halifax, Cirencester, 
Walton-on-the-Naze ; aU the Atlantic froni 
the Channel to 47° W. 

— May 7. Atlantic, lat. 46° N.-36° W.— 10th. Amster- 

dam.— 12th. Atlantic, lat. 46° N.-22° W.— 
13th. Dubhn ; Atlantic, lat. 48°N.-46° W., 
lat. 46° N.-20° W. and lat. 48° N.-15° W.— 
14th. Stonyhurst. 

— June 12. Amsterdam, 

— July 1. Leicester.— 9th. Atlantic, lat. 60° N.-22°W.— 

11th. Atlantic, lat. 49° N.-40° W.— 21st. 
Leicester, Carlisle. — 22nd. Carlisle. — 27th. 

— Aug. 13. Stonyhurst.— 28th. Atlantic, lat. 50° N.-32° 


— Sept. 2. Atlantic, lat. 47° N.-51° W.— 3rd. Atlantic, 

lat. 45° N.-55° W.— 4th. Atlantic, lat. 40° 
N.-70° W.— 6th. Atlantic, lat. 39° N.-70° W. 
— 11th. Stonyhurst. — 14th. Atlantic, lat. 
44° N.-60° W.— 15th. Atlantic, lat. 49° N.- 
37° W. 

— Oct. 8. Atlantic, lat. 47° N.-42° W.— 12th. Atlantic, 

lat. 47° N.-47° W.— 14th. Atlantic, lat. 48° 


N.-42° W.— 15th. Atlantic, lat. 47° N.-4 ' 
W. and lat. 51° N.-22° W. 

1885. Nov. 7. Atlantic, lat. 44° N.-52° W. and lat. 49° N.-2y° 

W.— 9th. Atlantic, lat. 44° N.-55° W. and 
lat. 47° N.-45° W.— 10th. Atlantic, lat. 48^ 
N.-37° W. 

1886. Jan. 9. Torquay.— 21st, 29th. Kcenigsherg. 

— Peb. 20, 21. Kcsnigsberg. 

— Mar. 3, 14. Kcenigsherg. — 30th. Yebleron, Eolleville 

(Seine-Inf.),la Mothe-Achard (Vendee), west 

of France ; Dublin, Eamelton, Kingstown ; 

Magdeburg, Greifswald, Greifenberg, 

Liverpool; Kcenigsherg. 
Dax. — 27th. Torquay, Paisley, Gilsland, 

Eamelton (Ireland) ; Kcenigsherg. — 30th. 


1887. Feb. 12. Bothkamp.— 14th. Kcenigsherg. 
Stonyhurst. — 20th. Kcenigsherg. 

Kcenigsherg.— 25th. Atlantic, lat. 47°N.-33° W. 
Atlantic, lat. 49° N.-15° W.— 19th. Atlantic. 

lat. 41° N.-69° W.— 24th. Kcenigsherg. 

— Aug. 29. Atlantic, lat. 47° N.-38° W. 

— Oct. 27, 31. Kcenigsherg. 

— Nov. 21. Atlantic, lat. 46° N.-52° W. and lat. 45° N... 

48° W. 

— Deo. 6. Atlantic, lat. 44° N.-57° W.— 16th. Atlantic, 

lat. 50° N.-21° W., and lat. 46° N.-48° W. 

1888. Jan. 13. Kcenigsherg. 

— Mar. 8. Atlantic, lat. 44° N.-55° W., and lat. 54° N.-27° 

W.— 15th. Atlantic, lat. 46° N.-38° W. and 
lat. 42° N.-56°W.— 29th. Kcenigsherg. 

— Apr. 2. Kcenigsherg; Atlantic, lat. 55° N.-27° W.— 8th. 

Kcenigsherg. — 11th. Atlantic, lat. 46° N.- 
42° W., and lat. 48° N.-31° W. 

— May 6. Eock-Ferry (near Liverpool). — 7th. Atlantic, 

lat. 40° N.-72° W. — 11th. Atlantic, lat. 
46° N.-42° W.— 20th. Atlantic, lat. 44° N.- 
52° W.— 28th. Kcenigsherg. 

— July 7. Atlantic, lat. 47° N.-33° W. 

— Aug. 3. Atlantic, lat. 47° N.-44° W. 

— Sept. 7. Atlantic, lat. 42° N.-67° W., and lat. 44° N.- 

55° W.— 9th. Atlantic, lat. 42° N.-64° W.— 











Apr. 21. 
May 17. 
June 18. 


26th. Atlantic, lat. 50° N.-32° W.— 28tli. 
Atlantic, lat. 58° N.-9° W. 

1888. Oct. 2. Atlantic, lat. 54° N.-34° W.— 5th. Atlantic, lat. 

41° N.-70° W., and lat. 46° N.-48° W.— 8th. 
Atlantic, lat. 58° N.-37° W., and lat. 53° N.- 
43° W.— 10th. Atlantic, lat. 48° N.-40° W.— 
11th. Atlantic, lat. 50° N.-32° W. — 19th. 
Atlantic, lat. 45° N.-57° W.— 26th. Kcenigs- 
herg.— 30th. Atlantic, lat. 52° N.-65° W.— 
31st. Atlantic, lat. 61° N.-27° W. 

— Nov. 1. Atlantic, lat. 49° N.-36° W.— 4th. Koenigsberg ; 

Atlantic, lat. 50° N.-25° W.— 6th. Atlantic, 
lat. 44° N.-55° W.— 9th. Atlantic, lat. 50° N.- 
19° W.— 26th. Atlantic, lat. 48° N.-42° W. 

1889. Feb. 19. Atlantic, lat. 45° N.-48° W. 

— Mar. 5. Atlantic, lat. 43° N.-57° W. 

— April 8. Atlantic, lat. 46° N.-40° W.— 25th. Atlantic, 

lat. 47° N.-44° W., and lat. 48° N.-46° W. 

— Sept. 15. Atlantic, lat. 46° N.-51° W. 

— Oct. 19. Atlantic, lat. 43° N.-65° W. 

— Nov. 1. Atlantic, lat. 44° N.-56° W.— 26th. Halifax; 

Atlantic, lat. 47° N.-46° W., and lat. 56° N.- 
25° W. 

— Dec. 27. Atlantic, 500 miles to the east of Cape Bace. 

1890. Jan. 27. Halifax. 

— July 16. Atlantic, lat. 52° N.-58° W.— 23rd. Atlantic, 

lat. 50° N.-46° W. — 28th. Atlantic, lat. 
52° N.-56° W. 

— Aug. 14. Atlantic, lat. 40° N.-73° W.— 15th. Atlantic, 

lat. 49° N.-39° "W. — 16th. Atlantic, lat. 
48° N.-45° W.— 18th. Atlantic, lat. 45° N.- 
55° W. 

— Sept. 3. Atlantic, lat. 44° N.-59° W.— 10th. Atlantic, 

lafc. 46° N.-53° W., and lat. 46° N.-55° W.— 
11th. Atlantic, lat. 49° N.-37° W., lat. 52° N.- 
56° W.,lat. 45° N.-59° W., lat. 44° N.-63° W. 
and lat. 40° N.-67° W.— 12th. Atlantic, lat. 
50° N.-21° W., lat. 50° N.-30° W. and lat. 
53° N.-51° W.— 13th. Atlantic, lat. 55° N.- 
45° W.— 15th. Atlantic, lat. 50° N.-39° W. 
and lat. 46° N.-42° W.— 19th. Atlantic, lat. 
43° N.-62° W. 

— Oct. 5. Atlantic, lat. 49° N.-86° W., lat. 49° N.-38° W., 

lat. 45° N.-54° W., and lat. 40° N.-69° W.— 
11th. Atlantic, lat. 44° N.-60°W.— 14th. At- 
lantic, lat. 51° N.-30° W.— 17th. Atlantic, 


lat. 44° N.-50° W. — 18th. Atlantic, lat. 
49° N.-19° W. 
1890. Nov. 7. Atlantic, lat. 42° N.-67° W. and lat. 40° N.- 
70° W.— 8th. Atlantic, lat. 44° N.-60° W.— 
13th. Atlantic, lat. 61° N.-23° W. and Iftt. 
50° N.-36° W. 



'J^HE SUN. By C. A. Young, Ph. D., LL. D., Pro- 
-* fessor of Astronomy in Princeton University. New and re- 
vised edition, with numerous Illustrations. i2mo. Cloth, 

_ " In this book we see a master's hand. Professor Young has no superiors, if he has 
nv^s, among astronomers in this country. . . . 'The Sun ' is a book of facts and 
achievements, and not a discussion of theories, and it will be read and appreciated by 
all scientific students, and not by them alone. Being written in untechnical language. 
It IS equally adapted to a large class of educated readers not engaged in scientific pur- 
smts. ' — Jou-nial ofEdttcation^ Boston. 

" Professor Young's work is essentially a record of facts and achievements, rather 
than of theories and attempts at the interpretation of mysteries; yet the great ques- 
tions still remaining to be answered are of course discussed, and in a masterly man- 
ner." — Philadelphia Evening Bulletin. 

" It is one of the best books of popular science ever written, and deserves a host of 
readers." — The Dial, Chicago. 

" You feel throughout that a master is leadine; you amid the intricacies and mazes 
clone of the most absorbing of studies. . . . Many a one whose views are hazy and 
dim will find here just that enlightenment, without an overburdened technicality, that 
will prove most usefiil." — The Interior. 



Ball, F.R. S., author of *'An Atlas of Astronomy/' "The 

Cause of an Ice Age," etc. 8vo, Cloth, $5.00. 

"Sir Robert Ball has the happy gift of making abstruse problems intelligible to the 
■ wayfaring man' by the aid of simple language and a few diagrams. Science moves 
so fast that there was room for a volume which should enlighten the general reader on 
the present state of knowledge about solar phenomena, and that place the present 
treatise admirably fills." — London Chronicle. 

y As a specimen of the publisher's art it is superb. It is printed on paper which 
entices the reader to make marginal notes of reference to other books in his library, 
the type is large, the binding is excellent, and the volume is neither loo large nor 
too small to handle without fatigue." — iWw VorA Heralds 



S. Ball, F. R. S., Professor of Astronomy and Geometry at the 

University of Cambridge ; author of " Starland," " The Cause 

of an Ice Age," etc. With 72 Plates, Explanatory Text, and 

Complete Index. Small 4to. Cloth, $4.00. 

" The high reputation of Sir Robert Ball as a writer on astronomy at once popular 
and scientific is in itself more than sufficient recommendation of his newly published 
'Atlas of Astronomy.' The plates are clear and well arranged, and those of them which 
represent the more striking aspects pf the more important heavenly bodies are very 
beautifully executed. The introduction is written with Sir Robert Ball's well-known 
lucidity and simplicity of exposition, and altogether the Atlas is admirably adapted to 
meet the needs and smooth the difficulties of young and inexperienced students of 
astronomy, as well as materially to assist the researches of those that are more advanced." 
— London Times. 

New York: D. APPLETON & CO., 72 Fifth Avenue. 



OPULAR ASTRONOMY, A General Description 
of the Heavens. By Camille Flammarion. Translated 
from the French by J. Ellard Gore. With 3 Plates and 
288 Illustrations. 8vo, Cloth, $4.50. 
"The fullest and most elaborate compenun..ii of popular knowledge of astron- 
omy. . , . The book might reasonably be pronounced the most desirable of its kind." 
— New York Sun. 

" M. Flammarion has produced a work that charms while it interests. He has 
classified astronomy so perfectly that any person of ordinary intelligence may learn 
from his book practically all the men in the observatories know." — New York Times, 
"Flammarion talks, and his conversation is free from those technical expressions 
which make the obscure style more obscure. He treats the most abstruse problems in 
such a fashion that you see through them more clearly than you ever thought it pos- 
sible to do without years of study." — New York Herald. 

" While the translator has done excellent work, he has also added largely to the 
value of the book by his carefully prepared notes, in which he brings every astro- 
nomical theme down to date." — Chicago Inter-Ocean. 

"The book is one of extreme interest, and to our mind far surpasses in fascination 
any novel that was ever written." — London Literary World, 

■^^ Popular Introduction to the Study of the Starry Heavens with 
the Simplest of Optical Instruments. By Garrett P. Ser- 
viss. 8vo. Cloth, $1.50. 

" The glimpses he allows to be seen of far-stretching vistas opening out on every 
side of his modest course of observation help to fix the attention of the negligent, and 
lighten the toil of the painstaking student. . . . Mr. Serviss writes with freshness and 
vivacity." — London Saturday Review. 

" By its aid thousands of people who have resigned themselves to the ignorance in 
which they were left at school, by onr wretched system of teaching by the book only, 
will thank Mr. Serviss for the suggestions he has so well carried onC—New York 

" We are glad to welcome this popular introduction to the study of the heavens. 
There could hardly be a more pleasant road to astronomical knowledge than it 
affords. ... A child may understand the text, which reads more like a collection of 
anecdotes than anything else, but this does not mar its scientific valae."— Mature. 

'• Mr. Garrett P. Serviss's book, 'Astronomy with an Opera-Glass,' offers us an 
admirable handbook and guide in the cultivation of this noble asthetic discipline (the 
study of the stars)."— A^fK" York Home Journal. 

" The book should belong to every family library.''— .S^foB Home Journal. 

New York : D. APPLETON & CO., 72 Fifth Avenue. 



of Worlds, Studied under the Light of Recent Scientific Re- 
searches. By Richard Anthony Proctor. With Illustra- 
tions, some colored. i2mo. Cloth, $1.75. 

Contents. — Introduction. — Wliat the Eartb teaches us.— What we learn from 
the Sun.— The Inferior Planets.— Mars, the Miniature of our Earth.— Jupiter, the 
Giant of the Solar System. — Saturn, the Ringed World. — Uranus and Neptune, the . 
' Arctic Planets, — The Moon and other Satellites. — Meteors and Comets : their Office 
in the Solar System. — Other Suns than Ours. — Of Minor Stars, and of the Distri- 
bution of Stars in Space.— The Nebulse: are they External Galaxies ?— Supervision 
and Control. 



of Essays contrasting our Little Abode in Space and Time with 

the Infinities around us. To which are added Essays on the 

Jewish Sabbath and Astrology. i2mo. Cloth, $1.75. 

Contents.- Past and I'uture of the Earth.— Seeming Wastes in Nature.— New 
Theory of Life in other Worlds.- A Missing Comet.— The Lost Comet and its Me- 
teor Train.-^upiter.— Saturn and its System.— A Giant Sun.— The Star Depths.— 
Star Gauging.— Saturn and the Sabbath of the Jews.— Thoughts on Astrology. 


-» Essays on the Wonders of the Firmament. i2mo. Cloth, 


Contents.- A Dream that was not all a Dream.— The Sun.— The Queen of 
Night.— The Evening Star.— The Ruddy Planet.— Life in the Ruddy Planet.— The 
Prmce of Planets.— Jupiter's Family of Moons.- The Ring-Girdled Planet.— New- 
ton and the Law of the Universe.— The Discovery of Two Giant Planets.— The 
Lost Comet.— Tisitants from the Star Depths.— Whence come the Comets ?- The 
Comet Families of the Giant Planets.- The Earth's Journey through Showers.— 
How the Planets Grew.— Our Daily Light.— The Flight of Light.— A Cluster of 
Suns.— Worlds ruled by Colored Suns.- The King of Suns.— Four Orders of Suns. 
—The Depths of Space.— Charting the Star Depths.— The Star Depths Astir with 
Life.— The Drifting Stars.— The Milky Way. 

HE MOON: Her Motions, Aspect, Scenery, and Phys- 
ical Conditions. With Three Lunar Photographs, Map, and 
many Plates, Charts, etc. i2mo. Cloth, $2.00. 

Contents.— The Moon's Distance, Size, and Mass.- The Moon's Motions.— 
The Moon's Changes of Aspect, Rotation, Libration, etc.— Study of the Moon's 
Surface.- Lunar Celestial Phenomena.— Condition of the Moon's Surface.— Index 
to the Map of the Moon. 


Series of Familiar Essays on Scientific Subjects, Natural Phe- 
nomena, etc. i2mo. Cloth, $1.75. 



D. APPLETON & CO., 72 Fiftli Avenue, New York. 



Herschel. With Plates and Woodcuts. Eleventh edition 
8vo. Cloth, $4.00. 

Ennis. i2mo. Cloth, $2.00. 

Physical Constitution of the Heavenly Bodies. Familiarly ex- 
plained by Dr. H. Schellen, Director der Realschule I. O. 
Cologne. Translated from the second enlarged and revised 
German edition by Jane and Caroline Lassell. Edited, with 
Notes, by William Huggins, LL. D. With numerous Wood- 
cuts, Colored Plates, and Portraits ; also. Angstrom's and 
Kirchhoff's Maps. 8vo. Cloth, $6.00. 

" Certainly, as regards mere knowledge, the ' Spectrum Analysis ' has let us into 
many secrets of the physical universe which Newton and Laplace would have declared 
impossible for man's intellect to attain. The science is still in its infancy, but it is 
prosecuted by some of the ablest, most patient, and most enthusiastic observers, and 
some of the keenest thinkers, at present existing on our little, insignificant -physical 
globe." — Boston Globe. 


»^ Norman Lockyer, F. R. S., Correspondent of the Institute of 

France, etc. With Sixty Illustrations. i2mo. Cloth, $2.50. 

*' The study of spectrum analysis is one fraught with a peculiar fascination, and 
some of the author's experiments are exceedingly picturesque in their results. They 
are so lucidly described, too, that the reader keeps on, from page to page, never flag- 
ging in interest in the matter before him, nor putting down the book until the last page 
IS reached, "^^fw York Evening Express. 

^~'- By Lord OrmAthwaite. l8mo. Tinted paper. Cloth, $i.oa 


BERS, F. R. A. S., author of " Handbook of Descriptive and 

Practical Astronomy," etc. With 24 Illustrations. (Library of 

Useful Stories.) i6mo. Cloth, 40 cents. 

"One can here get a clear conception of the relative condition of the stars and con- 
stellations, and of the existent universe so far as it is disclosed to view. The author 
presents his wonderful and at times bewildering facts in a bright and cheery spmt that 
makes the book doubly attractive." — Boston Home yournal. 


New York : D. APPLETON & CO., 72 Fifth Avenue. 



Each book complete in itself. By writers of authority in their various 
spheres, itmo. Cloth, 40 cents per volume, 


j[ BERS, F. R. A. S., author of " Handbook of Descriptive and 
Practical Astronomy," etc. With 24 Illustrations. 

** The author presents his wonderful and at times bewildering facts in a bright and 
cheery spirit that makes the book doubly attractive." — Boston Home "Journal. 

J. Edward Clodd, author of " The Story of Creation," etc. 

" No candid person will deny that Mr. Clodd has come as near as any one at this 
time is likely to come to an authentic exposition of all the information hitherto gained 
regarding the earlier stages in the evolution of mankind." — Neui York Sun, 




Allen, author of " Flowers and their Pedigrees," etc. 

*'As fascinating in style as a first class story of fiction, and is a simple and clear 
exposition of plant life." — Boston Home yournal. 

jf Seeley, F. R. S., Professor of Geography in King's College, 
London. With Illustrations. 

" It is doubtful if the fascinating story of the planet on which we live has been pre- 
viously told so clearly and at the same time so comprehensively." — Boston Advertiser, 

G. F. Chambers, F. R. A. S. 

** Any intelligent reader can get clear ideas of the movements of the worlds ahout us. 
. . , Will impart a wise knowledge of astronomical wonders." — Chicago Inter-Ocean. 

1 A. Martin, F. G. S. 

" The value and importance of this volume are out of all proportion to its size and 
outward appearance." — Chicago Record. 


1 MUNRO, C. E. 

"The book is an excellent one, crammed full of facts, and deserves a place not 
alone on the desk of the student, but on the workbench of the practical electrician."— 
^ew York Times, 

1 OF THE EAST. By Robert Anderson, M.A., F. A. S., 
author of " Early England," " The Stuart Period," etc. 

New York • D. APPLETON & CO., 72 Fifth Avenue. 



TV, A History. By Park Benjamin, Ph.D., LL.B., Member 
of the American Institute of Mechanical Engineers, Associate 
Member of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engi- 
neers, etc. With. Three Portraits. 8vo. Cloth, $4.00. 

•' Mr. Benjamin surely has produced a book that will find interested readers through- 
out the entire woild, for wherever electricity goes as a commercial commodity a desire 
to know of its discovery and development will be awakened, and the desire can be satis- 
fied through no more delightful channel than through the information contained in this 
book." — New York Times. 

*'Mr. Benjamin has performed his self-imposed task in an admirable fashion, and 
has produced a work which has a distinct historical value." — Brookly?i Eagle. 

"A work that takes a high rank as a history dealing with an abstruse topic, but 
bestowing on it a wealth of vital interest, pouring over it streams of needed light, and 
touching all with a graceful literary skill that leaves nothing to be desired." — New York 
Mail and Express. 

"A very comprehensive and thorough study of electricity in its infancy. He pre- 
sents his matter clearly and in an interesting form. His volume is one of especial value 
to the electrical student, and the average reader will read it with interest." — Milwaukee 

" The work is distinctly a history. No technical preparation is required to read it, 
and it is free from all mathematical or other discussions which might involve difficulty. 
The style is, in the main, excellent." — Science. 

"A remarkable book. ... A book which every electrician ought to have at hand 
for reference — historic, not scientific reference— and which will prove instructive reading 
to the thoughtful of all classes." — New York Herald. 

"The most complete and satisfactory survey of the subject yet presented to the 
reading public. ... A volume which will appeal to an ever- increasing body of people ; 
and as a reference book it will prove invaluable to writers on the development and utility 
of electricity." — Philadelphia Evening Bulletin. 

"The leading work on the subject in any language." — New York Evening Post, 

"One of the best works devoted to the development of the great force of modem 
time that has been published in the last decade." — New York Commercial Advertiser. 

" The author has written a plain and simple history of the beginnings of electrical 
science, none the less but rather the more valuable because, without dilution or sac- 
rifice of accuracy, he has excluded mere technicalities and gratuitous scientific demon- 
strations." — Philadelphia Press. 

New York: D. APPLETON & CO., 72 Filth Avenue. 


-* of the Source and Rise of the Earliest English Settlements in 
America, with Special Reference to the Life and Character of 
the People. The first volume in A History of Life in the 
United States. By Edward Eggleston. Small 8vo. Cloth, 
gilt top, uncut, with Maps, $1.50. 

"Few works on the period which it covers can compare with this in point of mere 
literary attractiveness, and we fancy that many to whom its scholarly value will not ap- 
peal will read the volume with interest and delight." — New York Evening Post. 

** Written with a firm grasp of the theme, inspired hy ample knowledge, and made 
attractive by a vigorous and resonant style, the book will receive much attention. It 
is a great theme the author has taken up, and he grasps it with the confidence of a 
master," — New York Times. 

"Mr. Eggleston's * Beginners' is unique. No similar historical study has, to our 
knowledge, ever been done in the same way. Mr. Eggleston is a reliable reporter of 
facts; but he is also an exceedingly keen critic. He writes history without the effort 
to merge the critic in the historian. His sense of humor is never dormant He renders 
some of the dullest passages in colonial annals actually amusing by his witty treatment 
of them. He finds a laugh for his readers where most of his predecessors have found 
yawns. And with all this he does not sacrifice the dignity of history for an instant." — 
Boston Saturday Euening Gazette. 

"The delightful style, the clear flow of the narrative, the philosophical tone, and 
the able analysis of men and events will commend Mr. Eggleston's work to earnest 
students." — Philadelphia Public Ledger. 

"The work is worthy of careful reading, not only because of the author's ability as a 
literary artist, but because of his conspicuous proficiency in interpreting the causes of 
and changes in American life and character." — Boston Joui-nal. 

" It is noticeable that Mr. Eggleston has followed no beaten track, but has drawn 
his own conclusions as to the early period, and they differ from the generally received 
version not a little. The book is stimulating and will prove of great value to the stu- 
dent of history." — Minneapolis Journal, 

"A very interesting as well as a valuable book. ... A distinct advance iipon most 
that has been written, particularly of the settlement of New England." — Ne-wark 

" One of the most important books of the year. It is a work of art as well as ot 
historical science, and its distinctive purpose is to give an insight into the real life and 
character of people. . . The author's style is charming, and the history is fully as inter- 
esting as a novel." — Brooklyn Standard-Union. 

" The value of Mr. Eggleston's work is in that it is really a history of 'life,' not 
merely a record of events. . . . The comprehensive purpose of his volume has been 
excellently performed. The book is eminently readable." — Philadelphia Times, 

New York : D. APPLETON & CO., 72 Fifth Avenue. 



LISH NATION, With Special Reference to Epochs and 
Crises. A History of and for the People. By W. H. S. 
Aubrey, LL. D. In Three Volumes. i2mo. Cloth, $4.50. 

" The merit of this work is intrinsic. It rests on the broad intelligence and true 
philosophy of the method employed, and the coherency and accuracy of the results 
reached. The scope of the work is marvelous. Never was there more crowded into 
three small volumes. But the saving of space is not by the sacrifice of substance or 
of style. The broadest view of the facts and forces embraced by the subject is exhibited 
with a clearness of arrangement and a definitencss of application that render it per- 
ceptible to the simplest apprehension."— A^a» York Mail and Express. 

"A useful and thorough piece of work. One of the best treatises which the 
general reader can use." — London Daily Chronicle. 

"Conceived in a popular spirit, yet with strict regard to the modem standards. 
The title is fully borne out. No want of color in the descriptions."— Ztfw^ow Daily 

News. ^ 

"The plan laid down results in an admirable English history."— i(7«(/,j« Morning 

"Dr. Aubrey has supplied a want. His method is undoubtedly the right one "— 
Pall Mall Gazette. 

" It is a distinct step forward in history writing; as far ahead of Green as he was of 
Macaulay, though on a different line. Green gives the picture of England at different 
times— Aubrey goes deeper, showing the causes which led to the changes."— T^tfw 
York World. 

"A work that will commend itself to the student of history, and as a comprehen- 
sive and convenient reference book." — The Argonaut. 

"Contains much that the ordinary reader can with difficulty find elsewhere unless 
he has access to a library of special works." — Chicago Dial. 

" Up to date in its narration of fact, and in its elucidation of those great principles 
that underlie all vital and worthy history. . . . The painstaking division, along with 
the admirably complete index, will make it easy work for any student to get definite 
views of any era, or any particular feature of it. . . . The work strikes one as .being 
more comprehensive than many that cover far more space." — The Christian In- 
telligencer. / 

"One of the most elaborate and noteworthy of recent contributions to'Jiistorical 
Kterature." — New Haven Register. j 

*' As a popular history it possesses great merits, and in many particulars is excelled 
by none. It is full, careful as to dates, maintains a generally praiseworthy ^partiality, 
and it is interesting to read." — Buffalo Express. 

" These volumes are a surprise and in their way a marvel. . . . They constitute an 
almost encylopaedia of English history, condenhing in a marvelous manner the facts 
and principles developed in the history of the English nation. . . . The work is orie of 
unsurpassed value to the historical student or even the general reader, and when Aiore 
widely known will no doubt be appreciated as one of the remarkable contributions to 
English history published in the century." — Chicago Universaiist. 

" In every page Dr. Aubrey writes with the far reaching relation of contemporary 
incidents to the whole subject. The amount of matter these three volumes contliin is 
marvelous. The style in which they are written is more than satisfactory. . . . The 
work is one of unusual importance." — Hartford Post. 

New York : D. APPLETON & CO., 72 Fifth Avenue. 



i mvinnm » v \ i i nfvmmmfmijmmm \ mmf^imvmmmp Mi m m mm immm#m mim»ni i 

A tXKi 






|| lp fti * ftiii 

l Hl*H|BlM6to ^ " * » » r^tW» ».Hgt 

--^^^.--v.-^.,„^..,....| ......